s .116 DAVID DICKSON'S SYSTEM =OF= FARMING I Hass ^6C(r Rnnlc * H S" rmnvri^htN" COPyRIGHT DEPOSrr 3zx ^ "^ DAVID DICKSON'S SYSTEM lOFi FARMING Published by THE CULTIVATOR PUBLISHING CO.. Atlanta, Georgia. LIBRARY o< CONGRESS Two Conies Received AUa 18 1906 Copy ne tit tntry CLASjr Ci XKc, No, /s 3 ^7f ' COPY B. ' Copyrighted 1906 by THE CULTIVATOR PUBLISHING CO. Atlanta, Ga. INDEX PAGE. Tntrofluction — (David Dickson, his Great and Wonderful Suc- cess as a Farmer) 5 Agriculture as an Applied Science 10 Teaching Lal)or to be ]More Effective 12 Importance of Informing your Minds 14 Chapter I., The Farm 16 Chapter II., General Treatment of Lands 18 Chapter III., Fertilization of Soils and Crops 21 Chapter IV., Organic and Inorganic Manures 28 Chapter Y., Breaking Lands 34 Chapter VL, Cultivation of Crops 38 Chapter YIL, Cultivation of Corn 41 Chapter VIIL, Cultivation of Cotton 45 Chapter IX., Growing Wheat 52 Chapter X., Potatoes. Turnips" and Vegetables, (two-field system) 55 Chapter XL. Fruit Culture and Care of Stock 50^ Chapter XIL. On Immigration 65 Chapter XIIL. Best Extracts from the Writings of Dickson 73 DAVID DICKSON His Great and Wonderful Success as a Farmer. INTRODUCTION Mr. Dickson was reared on a farm, and while yet a plough-boy, conceived the principles of agriculture that now distinguish the system of farming which has immortalized his name, and brought him not only fame but fortune. While ploughing and hoeing corn, in his boyhood, it occurred to him that that method of cultivating was wrong. He says, "while plough- ing — cutting the roots of plants — I could see the effect of hot days be- hind me in less, than thirty minutes, and it would continue for days to damage the crops, more or less, ac- cording to after seasons. Even with the hoe, digging round the corn, and hilling up, I could see the corn wilt at once, in hot and dry weather; and the corn would fire more or less, and sometimes be thus prevented from silking well. How was this to be pre- vented? I formed my opinion then, and put it in practice as soon as I commenced planting." Again, he says, "I saw new land full of mpld, never baked, was always easily worked, and would stand a long drouth and a heavy wet spell. The conclusion was, to keep all land in the virgin state, as near as possible. How was this to be done?" The reader will notice that these ob- servations and inquiries struck at the very foundations of agriculture. His close duty to nature had detected a fundamental error, and his genius readily devised the remedy. When, years afterwards, Mr. Dick- son had determined to invest his all in farming, so strong was his faith in the truth of the convictions of his youth upon these agricultural sub- jects, that he adopted them in his practice, discarding the old stereotyped system of farming as erroneous. In developing the principle of his newly- conceived system, and reducing it to practice, he found that one prepara- tion of land was all-sufficient for each crop; that the lands would be im- proved, would produce double the crop per acre; and that a hand could culti- vate fifty per cent, more acres, and obtain more than five times the usual dividends. INTRODUCTION. At twenty-one years of age, Mr. Dickson started out with $1,200. By merchandising and trading, lie made $2.5,000 in fourteen years. At this period (1845) he invested all his means in lands, negroes, stock and agricul- tural utensils, and commenced farm- ing. He purchased two hundred and sixty-six acres of land, for which he paid from $1 to $2 per acre, and for some as low as 50 cents per acre. Lands, under his system and success, continued to rise in price until 1860, when he paid .$18 per acre for the last. The average $7 per acre. This land had been producing four bushels of corn per acre, and two hundred pounds of seed cotton. On beginning to plant he followed his own peculiar notions, putting in practice the concep- tions of his boyhood; and these con- stitute the guiding principles of the Dickson system of farming to-day. These early impressions have been verified by experience, and thoroughly demonstrated by successful results. He says his crops were fine from the very first, and that he never failed to make a good average crop, no matter what the season. The reader will observe, that Mr. Dickson's first crop was, a success; and that, at that time, guano had not been introduced. This fact tends to correct the impression that Mr. D's success in farming has been attributa- ble alone to the liberal use of "am- monia" — in other words, to the em- ployment of guanos. We know that he did not use much guano until 1857. Yet his crops were "fine" and paid good dividends! What does this show? Clearly, that most of his suc- cess as a farmer has been due to his peculiar method of treating his lands, and cultivating his crops, and not ma- terially to his feeding his lands with ammonia, superphosphate, potash, land plaster and salt. The principle'=' of cultivation, in his system, are es- sentially different from the popular system of agriculture, and to this sys- tem, as a whole, conjoined with Mr. Dickson's native genius and extraordi- nary executive ability must we at- tribute his success. Peruvian guano, or even "Dickson's Compound," used according to the common plan of farming, would not pro- duce half such results. The "magic" is to be found in the way it is used, and the general policy of treating and cultivating the lands. It is a great mistake to say, that guano has made Mr. Dickson. The fact is, Mr. Dickson helped to make the guano market. Native genius, good judg- ment, his study of nature and her laws, and their application to agriculture, have made Mr. Dickson. True, guano has been a potent agency in his hand, but it has paid better with him than it has with nine-tenths of the planters, because he has used it in accordance with the principles of rational agri- culture. But the liberal use of ferti- lizers constitutes an important in- gredient in his system of farming. Guano has paid him, while it has proved worthless with many who have not employed it with a proper system of cultivation. Mr. Dickson's system must be taken as a whole, and in cal- culating his results, guano must come in only for a part of the credit. Mr. Dickson had planted nine years before he used guano to its full extent, (200 to 250 pounds to the acre), and yet his crops were good. In 1846, the second year of Mr. Dick- son's planting, he made his first trial of guano. "I saw," he says, "an ad- vertisement in the 'American Farmer,' Baltimore, of the wonderful effects of Peruvian guano. I procured three sacks, and used it, and finding it paid, used it in increased quantities, till 1855 or 1856, and then went in to it fully." Very soon after this Mr. Dickson com- menced having bones prepared with acid, according to English farming, furnishing what we now use as "dis- solved bones." This he combined with Peruvian p;uano, and ultimately he added land plaster, salt and potash. This combination was a result of a great deal of experimenting with all kinds of guanos, and, as the reader knows, it is now his favorite "com- pound." The reader will notice subsequently INTRODUCTION. an experiment with this compound and the result. With $17 worth per acre, the crop was three thousand pounds per acre the field over, equivalent to two bales, which, at the market value at that time, was worth $250. A part of this tract produced 6,000 pounds seed cotton per acre. Again, there will be found an experi- ment showing the great advantages of using the whole compound — the bene- ficial effect of the addition of land plaster and salt to Peruvian guano and dissolved bones. This formula was produced by Mr. Dickson, and was the result of a vast amount of experi- menting with all kinds of guano, and which is as near perfect as manure can be made. With this mixture, together with his improved system of farming, Mr. Dickson has produced those "fabu- lous" results with which he is accred- ited. Before the war, his crops aver- aged him from ten to fourteen bales cotton per hand, and nearly one bale per acre, besides an abundance of corn, fodder, bacon, etc. He raised enough bacon and grain to pay for two- thirds of his guano. He cultivated and gathered fifty acres to the hand — lGy2 in cotton, 16i/^ in corn, and lei/L- in small grain, or as near that division as practicable. Such was his economy of labor, and his system of manage- ment, that a visitor might ride through his farm, without seeing a weed or a bunch of grass in his crop. His hands would gather — some of them three bales of cotton per week, and many of them two bales, during the favorable part of the season. Corn and fodder were always stored around him in abundance. I have seen much of his crop for the last three years, and have not seen many acres in any of these crops that I estimated at less than one hale to the acre. True, the crops that I saw were on the best part of his farm, and received the most of his attention. I saw a field of his last fall planted in .Tune, that had fourteen hundred pounds cotton to the acre. Mr. Dickson says, that last year (1869) was the dryest and hottest year he ever saw; that he had but one rain during the summer, and that in Au- gust. And yet he made a good average crop. I saw his crop in November, and consequently know what I say. He made last year — that is, all his tenants, black and white — between seven and eight hundred bales of cot- ton. These facts verify what Mr. Dickson claims for his system of farm- ing — that good crops can be made with the least rain that can fall any summer, and that if the work is prop- erly and thoroughly done, there need be no such thing as a failure. The many reports made by visitors and correspondents, as to Mr. Dickson's crops, are substantially true. He has had unprecedented success during his whole farming career, without a single failure, and still sustains his reputa- tion, by producing larger and still larger crops. He has no successful rival as a planter; and it may truly be said of him, "he stands at the head of his profession." He once bought a plantation, with the negroes, stock and every thing on it, and paid for the whole with one crop. He did not visit the place but once a month, had the same number of hands and paid all charges. In 1859, Mr. Dickson, with fifty-six hands, made and gathered six hundred and sixty-seven bales of cotton, besides one hundred dollars' worth per hand of bacon, corn, etc. So successful was Mr. Dickson in making money by farming, that his lit- tle plantation of two hundred and six- ty-six acres rapidly extended its area, and now, in the language of a corre- spondent, "he owns the domain of a prince." When the war began, his property was worth, by fair estimate $500,000, clear of all encumbrance. This he had made in fifteen years by farming, with a capital of $25,000 to start with. Not a dollar had been made outside of his farm. Here is a striking contrast between the profits of trade and merchandise and farming. It took him fourteen years at a trade (o make $25,000; but during the fifteen years succeeding, he accumulated $500,000 by farming — not counting four hundred bales of cotton, and a large supply of bacon, and grain, given to the Confederate Government, and burnt by Sherman in 1864. He deliv- ered to the Confederate Government four hundred bales of cotton, for 8 INTRODUCTION. which he got bonds which were never paid; and after the first year of the war he planted no cotton, but raised provisions for the army, and for most of which he received no pay, not even in Confederate money. General Sher- man burned four hundred bales of cot- ton, took all his stock, and a large amount of provisions. He owned two hundred and fifty (250) select negroes, which were worth fifty per cent, more than the average of negroes. Since the war, Mr. Dickson has been planting cautiously, "not caring to save money till we had a Govern- ment that would protect us in person and in property." He sayp his crops have been fair, but his dividends less than before the war, because of bad labor, stealage, killing stock, etc. He is now working on the tenant system, and is again making his nine hundred bales of cotton, including his Texas crop, and declaring good dividends. He uses the "Compound" exclusively for all crops, and plants the "Dickson Cotton." He owns thirty thousand acres of land, and a good deal of rail- road and company stock, besides his plantation stock, farming implements, etc., amounting in the aggregate, to not much less than half-million dollars. Add to this amount, his losses from the war, and the emancipation of his slaves, which he says were "worth $300,000," and the reader can approxi- mate what would have been Mr. Dick- son's wealth, as the profits of twenty- five years' farming, on a capital of twenty-five thousand dollars — losing near five years of this time, for dur- ing the war he planted no cotton, but raised provision crops for the Govern- .ment. Estimating all these losses, who can say that Mr. Dickson would not have been worth to-day, one million dollars, but for that unfortunate war, that swept away his earnings? Mr. Dickson has always lived well, entertaining a great deal of company in sumptuous style, and allowed him- self every comfort and luxury that heart could desire. He has devoted more than half his time, since he has been farming, to his visiting friends, who, attracted by his fame as a planter, came from all parts of the United States to see his farm, and obtain information in regard to his system of agriculture. He has rid- den with them thousands of miles and through all kinds of weather and written and read no telling how many wagon loads of letters, besides his con- tributions to the agricultural journals. Having an innate fondness for agri- culture, Mr. Dickson gave himself to its study with all the zeal of a devotee, and would have given it "all the ener- gies of his intellect," but for the diver- sion occasioned by constant interrup- tion and taxes upon his time. In esti- mating the sum total of his success in his agricultural pursuits, a large sum must be placed to his credit for this loss of time. For many years past, not a mail, perhaps, that does not bring him from a dozen to several dozen letters, to be read and answered on the subject of agriculture. True, he is delighted to see them come, and often invites company; yet, the atten- tions thus necessarily devoted, occa- sion neglect of his business, and les- sen his products. Very many persons think that Mr. Dickson's reports as to large crops, are taken from his fancy brag patches, and that his general crop does not cor- respond. This is uncharitable, as well as untrue. He claims credit for his general results — so much corn and cotton per hand. Like a general in the aimy, he operates from his head- quarters at home. His farm consists of many little farms, which he seldom visits. He furnishes the implements and material, and gives direction; but the executio:^ of the work is entrusted entirely to the laborers, having no overseers or superintendents; nor did he ever, have an occasion even in sla- very times, except on one place. It is evident, then, that Mr. Dickson's suc- cess has been attributable to the ad- vantage of his system of farming, to- gether with his general policy and management. He has been richly re- warded for his zeal and research in the study of agriculture; and the rea- son that so few people approach him in his results is, they do not follow his teachings, or his practice. Success depends upon the adoption of his sys- tem as a whole. Guano alone is not the "potent charm"; neither is deep INTRODUCTION. breaking of land, or subsoiling, or sur- face culture, or rotation of crops; but all these agencies must be taken in combination. Tlie neglect of one may paralyze the whole. This system is drawn fi'om the study of nature's laws, and not one of its precepts may be safely violated. Many who undertake to follow the Dickson plan of farming, do it only in part, and consequently the failure. Its beauty and strength consists in the union of its parts. Ad- here rigidly to the principle, and carry out in practice. Study it as a system — as a whole. Execute it with tact and judgment, and confidently expect results approaching the success that has rewarded the labors of Mr. Dick- son. The dividends of stocks constitute the true test of their value — so the crops, and clear profits, are the tests, and indicate the practical value of any system of farming. Is it not wonder- ful — not to say incredible, that in the poorest parts of Hancock County, Ga., a man can take $25,000, and double it twenty times in fifteen years? And yet it is true with Mr. Dickson. He has done that, and during the time has used, for his own household ex- penses, during the whole time, fully seven per cent, on the $25,000; and has not Invested a dollar in trade or any speculation during the time! The people of Hancock County will vouch for the truth t)f this statement. I state these facts that they may en- courage young men to effort and en- terprise, and demonstrate to them that farming, as a vocation, can be made lucrative; for it is certainly true, what has been accomplished by one may be accomplished again by others! Mr. Dickson's success as a farmer seems really beyond comprehension. Editor of Cultivator. Peruvian Guano on the Left and Ordinary Guano on tiie Right. Agriculture as an Applied Science BY DAVID DICKSON Agricultural science comprises a knowledge of soils, their general prop- erties, class and chemical composi- tion; also the natural history of plants, their habits, wants, physiology of assimilation, growth, reproduction, etc. It also involves the study of the atmospheric air and water, the two great vitalizing elements of both ani- mal and vegetable life. These with the natural laws governing these ele- ments, and their mutual relations and influences in the growth of crops, con- stitute the basis of agricultural sci- ence and practical familiarity with all these subjects, as applied to farm- ing, are necessarily essential to intel- ligent agriculture. How can the cultivator be expected to know the importance of breaking, subsoiling and cultivating lands for the production of crops when he knows nothing as to the chemical com- position of the air, and the vitalizing effects it has upon ^.rowing crops? How could he conceive of the impor- tance of husbanding the spring rains, and storing away a bountiful supply for the summer crops without the knowledge of the chemical and ma- terial value of rain-water in bringing to the soil ammonia, carbonic acid, and other fertilizing gasses from the atmosphere, and its active agency in dissolving the organic and mineral substances of the soil, and thus mak- ing them assimilable as plant food? Rains are not alone important for moistening and softening and mellow- ing the soil so as to allow the crop roots to readily traverse and pene- trate, but equally important in a chem- ical and philosophical sense. Hence, agricultural science teaches the prac- tical importance of deep, mellow soil, calculated to hold and retain suffi- ciency of moisture for the crops during their season of growth and maturity. Upon the same basis must be placed the application of manures to soils and fertilizers to crops. How can the farmer intelligently compost his ma- nures, or select fertilizers for his crops, when he knows nothing as to the chemical composition of soil, or the or-ganic constittients of crops to be grown tipon it, and hence knows not the chemical wants of his crop? If the cultivator knows nothing as to the design of nature in putting forth roots and fibrils to every plant, how can he be expected to intelligently decide as to comparative benefit or injury re- sulting from deep or shallow culture? How can he, calculate the extent of damage he is doing his growing crops by rudely invading the soil that has been allotted to them, and cutting off the roots — through which, alone, the crops reach and utilize the soil for support and growth? He knows not that he is violating the laws of nature by interrupting a process which na- ture has instinctively designed for the benefit of this growing plant? Science teaches what are the real objects of cultivation. Destroying the grass an'd weeds, and thus saving the entire strength of the soil for the planted crop, and so breaking the sur- AGRICULTTTRE AS AN APPLIED SCIENCE. 11 face, soil as to admit the atmospheric air in the soil beneath, as a nutrient and vitalizer. Deep culture, also ef- fects both of these objects, but no more efficiently than the sweep culture, and with the decided disadvantage of tear- ing off the plant-roots, and thus depriv- ing the crops of their main agents and source of support, which stuns and cripples the plants and absolutely foils the designs of nature, and seriously in- jures instead of benefiting the crop. Nature does no superfluous work. She puts forth to her plants no supernu- merary root or rootlet, not absolutely needed by the plant for its growth and development. Hence, by deep cul- ture and root-cutting we violate the laws of nature. Science clearly teaches its agriculturist the impoi-- tance of strictly conforming to and fostering the designs of nature, and it plainly teaches the policy of conserv- ing and utilizing not only the shower and the sunshine, but every available element and agency. By the teachings of agricultural science, the planter can intelligently compost his manure heaps, and select his fertilizers for his several crops, ac- cording to the soil he cultivates; and such discriminate selection is not only important to the growth of the weed, but to the final development aad fruit- age of the crop. It points out rational methods of culture, and general treat- ment of each individual crop, by fur- nishing from its natural history the special and peculiar nature and devel- opment of each individual class of crops. For instance, cotton is shown to be a sun plant, and especially adapted to a certain latitude, where it grows and matures more perfectly and is comparatively exempt from pests and . casualties. This favorite belt is known to be in latitude 30 to 34 degrees. The evidence of its being a sun plant is seen in the fact that, as soon as the sun rises, the cotton plant holds out the broadest surfaces of its leaves to the sun, and continues grow- ing till killed by the frost. Its habit is to elaborate the food, return it to the squares and bolls, and thus mature the fruit rapidly so as to escape the worm and frost. Science also teaches from this same peculiar habit of cotton, that, to mature the greatest quantity of it before the frost comes, or other casualties attack it, it must be planted thickly in the drill, in order that the fruitage may be hastened. From the same teachings, corn is known to be an annual, delighting in a latitude higher than cotton; and that the higher the latitude in which it will ■certainly mature, the larger the yield per acre — everything else being equal. Unlike cotton, it begins elaborating substances for the grain at once, and returns it to the storehouse in the center of the stalk to be brought out at the proper time of shooting and maturing the ear. Tliis point of natural history teaches us to give the stalks good distance in- stead of planting it thick as we do cotton. If there should not be enough soluble matter for two stalks the re- sult would be no ear, or a very small nubbin. If there be only one stalk left, and there be enough soluble matter in the place allotted to that stalk to make two ears, the one stalk will absorb and appropriate it all and even more, and the one stalk will make from two to four ears of corn. Another important scien- tific fact connected with corn culture is that, whe.n given good distance — so many square yards to each stalk — it will make a larger crop in a dry year; and, if seasonable, a single stalk will always be double-eared, provided the soil be fertile and in good heart. The higher the latitude, the thicker the corn may be planted, but even then it can be over seeded: such facts indi- cate, and experience has determined what should be the distance given this crop; never to exceed a stated number of ears to the bushel the land ought to make. As thus seen, agricultural science is based entirely upon natural laws. From nine-tenths to nineteen-twentioths of all the substances that sustain ani- mal and vegetable life, and build up bodies, come from the atmosphere; and hence the lesson taught us by science, to so treat, prepare and cultivate lands as to utilize this element to the great- est possible extent for the benefit of growing crops. The more or less effi- cient execution of these lessons of •science, as ai)plied to the treatment 12 DICKSON'S SYSTEM OF FARMING. and keeping up of lands, the recupera- tion of exhausted and the enrichment of poor and unproductive lands, will constitute the triumph of science, al- lied with administrative genius, in at- taining results worthy the name of suc- cessful farming. The great object of study and prac- tice is to know how to utilize the at- mosphere, and to work up the manures into the soil. We have but few text- books on this subject. We have to be- gin almost at the beginning. When these subjects are reduced to practice, and written out in the form of text- books, the study of agriculture as a science will be comparatively an easy one; but under no circumstances will the work ever be performed with success unless with preparation by the planter, and study of all the laws, prac- tices and arts, times and mode of cul- tivation. One object should be to uti- lize water, and to make the greatest yield from the least water; and there never has been a year when there was not water enough to make fair crops, provided the cultivation was done with care and science. I believe the culti- vation of corn can be carried to such a point, that you can make a full crop with two good seasons. TEACHING LABOR TO BE MORE EFFECTIVE. No system can prosper without teaching all the operatives and labor- ers to be experts, whether agricultu- ral or manufacturing, or anything that is done requiring labor. The first thing to do, in regard to any of the op- erations of labor, is to teach the labor- ers how to do it; the next thing, to do it with more ease and efficiency, and to learn to do better work every day. For instance, take a boll of cotton. They must be taught, with the great- est speed, how to throw the hand into the boll, and pull out all of the cotton with one lick, not waiting to see whether any is left in the boll or not, always having in mind to strike but one lick at the boll, and as soon as that is done, to strike at another boll. I have, in five minutes, taught a hand to pick one hundred pounds more of cotton per day than he had picked on the previous day, and from that point he will continue to improve. The greatest efficiency I have obtained in hands picking cotton was eight hun- dred pounds — equal to more than three good bales a week. The same improvement can be made in other species of labor on the farm* One hand will plough so as to fatten his horse, doing a full, good day's, work; while another hand will do in- ferior work, hardly so much as the other hand, and reduce his horse to poverty. A hand using a sweep or plough, can arrive at such efficiency, that he can do the ploughing and hoe- ing and go his sixteen and two-third miles per day, which is a day's work. This is my practice, not having to put a hoe in the corn field, and having had the cleanest crops in the neighbor- hood. The same efficiency may be acquired with the axe. Quick motion; throw the axe with the proper spring and line, so as to go precisely to the line, with a sleight that will knock out the chip. The same thing with the maul and wedge. One man will make rails with less than half the labor another does. If a laborer will watch these experts, and do as they do, he will effect the same results. With the hoe, some hands will chop and motion a dozen times at a bunch of grass; an expert will keep his hoe sharp, and pull it through the row, leaving everything clean behind, and can strike to the sixteenth of an inch any time of the place he wishes. The same thing is true of the hewer using a broad-axe. One will strike a dozen licks to get to the line, the last one will probably go through the line into the timber. The expert, with, his improved eye and motions, strikes to a hair's breadth the first lick of where the line should be, and carries it equally through to the bottom of the timber, doing from two to three times the work per day as the botch. Still more true is it when you set ex- perts to manufacturing, making shoes, or tending machinery of any kind. One operative in a factory will draw three or four threads while another will TEACHING LABOR. 13 draw only one, or will attend to four loonas while another will attend to but two. There is a great difference also with wagoners, one requiring double the time to gear his team that another does, fumbling around his team, hunt- ing up things to do, and so losing two or three loads on the plantation in a day with a six-horse team, and losing enough to pay for three experts per day. The same improvements may be made in art and execution in using plantation machinery and gearing that can be made in any other profession and art. During last year, I learned some val- uable new lessons. One was the training of hands to do double the amount of work, with more ease, and less of sweat and muscle. My former hands, being better trained than oth- ers, had better offers than I could give, and nine-tenths of them left me. I then employed hands from as many as forty plantations, and got none that_ knew how to work to any advantage. I had hands before the war that could pick eight hundred poimds of cotton in a day, all by daylight; and all hands that went to the fields averaged three hundred pounds per day, without any white man in the field. In my system of deep preparation, thorough manuring, and surface cul- ture, the results depend altogether on the time and judgment when to work, where to work, and the style of the work. To be successful, and to pay dividends, you must do the greatest quantity of the work with the least la- bor. That art is acquired by studying practice. To attain it, you must ap- proach the perfectness of a juggler, or sleight-of-hand man. With a peculiar sleight, one man will throw an axe into a piece of timber, with half the force of another, and with the same or bet- ter result. It is absolutely necessary to come to time. All the operations should move at once; this is just as es- sential as it is for a team of mules in a wagon. To perform all these things successfully, you must have absolute control over the laborer. Every far- mer should teach this art to his labor- ers. If the farm hands on one planta- tion only leani this, they will always be offered inducements by other plan- ters to leave. The hands on the place should be taught to do every kind of work with facility and ease. Nothing pays so well in hoeing as to get every bunch of grass. Taking up a bunch of grass injures a crop of cotton equal to bad ploughing, if not perfectly done. The science of agriculture is soon learned, and is of incalculable impor- tance; but nothing to compare with the execution of details. Many of the Confederate generals of the late war had the same military education and book training as General Lee; but none of them came near executing as he did. Two planters may have the same knowledge of planting, while in execu- ting, one will get rich, and the other break, and thinking they were operat- ing upon the same system of farming. To enumerate, in brief, a few of the mottoes of success in farming, I would say: Always come to time, and keep a little ahead, and the work will be easy. Do the winter work in the winter, and the spring work in the spring, and do it well. Cultivate a little ahead of time. Gather as soon as crops are ready. The most important part is the judgment when to plant, and how and where to work, and with what tools, and what part of the crop to work. In hoeing, always have sharp hoes, and use only the force necessary to the particular object, raising the hoe only six to eight inches, and more licks can be made. Only get under the crown of the grass. Always be governed by natural laws and natural causes. The style and expertness of the work are no small things; and judgment in coming to time, and work- ing at the right place and in the right style of work, etc. Those who may presume to call my plan of farming a failure, either do not know it, or cannot execute it. The di- vidends of stocks are the true tests of their value. Crops and dividends are the true tests of any system of farm- ing. I would fain shrink from say- ing anything about my planting, but my practical success has been so 14 DICKSON'S SYSTEM OF FARMING. beyond comprehension, and so known hj my Hancock friends, as induces me to report for the encouragement of all enterprising young farmers. Is it not hard to believe that in the poorest part of Hancock County, Georgia, a man can take $25,000 and double it twenty times in fifteen years? But it is true, and in the meantime, I have consumed at least seven per cent, of the capital for my family expenses. One of the most important things to learn is how to control labor and how to have your laborers in place, and all move together at once, doing the work the easiest way, but for the best effect. I am writing of old times. I teach all my hands fo be experts — to do the work better and faster than others. I never knew how little work other farmers got out of hands before the war. My old hands could do fifty per cent, more work and with more ease, than any I have ever employed since. Each one could do any kind of work done on the farm; the newcomers could do one or two kinds of work, and that not well. But some people can not believe that any- thing can be done which they can not do themselves. Dr. Lee once remarked of my farming, when on a visit, that "Mr. Dickson had demon- strated to men of small means, that not only a living could be made on poor land but a large fortune, and that as the great majority of land was poor, there was no calculating what might be done by careful study of the science of agriculture and the art of farming." IMPORTANCE OF INFORMING YOUR MINDS. Some men are born generals, some mechanics, some orators, some farm- ers; some adapted to one profession, and some to another; but the great mass of men have to read, study and practice, to become efficient in any calling they may select; and if they ap- ply themselves faithfully, and do not rise above mediocrity, they should quit that business and try some other. "WTiatever has been accomplished by man can be done again, and ought to be done better, with all the accumu- lated knowledge of the past before us. "What is book-farming? It does not mean to take a book in your hand and go to the field; but it means you should read and study everything that you can possibly bring to bear on farming, and store it away in your head. But be sure to master the subject, anc] learn the true plan. This is the science of agriculture. Study bad practice as well as good, and learn of the latter the errors, that you may a- void them. Read books until you be- come so perfect in theory and the use of tools and manure that you will have confidence and the nerve to act, and act at once — not lose time running a- bout to your neighbors, to see when to do a thing and how to do it. Do not let frost, or wet or dry weather cause you to doubt or dally. Fortify your- self with books before you begin — such books as will teach you everything necessary to your success; and do not forget that you can learn something from almost- every profession. Book farming means for the farmer, just what book-learning does for the physician. The medical student must read all the books and attend all the lectures, and the dissecting room, un- til he can pass, then take his medicine and instruments, go out to practice and test his knowledge. So with book farming. You must read and study, not only agricultural books, but all books that would apply in any way to that profession. You need the knowledge of a general to enable you to discipline your labor- ers to come to time — ^to move all at once — to know when to charge, when to retreat. You need the knowledge of a banker, when your money is made, to know how to invest it (and this is a very important point). You want the knowledge of a bookkeeper, that you may keep your accounts correctly. In this, many farmers fail — they fool themselves, not knowing how to keep their debtor and creditor accounts — get in debt and become bankrupts be- fore they are aware of it. You must have some knowledge of mechanics and machinery, or you will never know how to keep implements and machines in order or use them; and if the farmer is ignorant, how can he instruct the la- borer? You should even have a suf- INFORMING YOUR MINDS. 15 licieut knowledge of law to know how to keep out of the courts. You should have some knowledge of commerce and trade, for you have to buy and sell. Y''ou should learn from the merchant order and punctuality. This is no small item in a lifetime business. How is all this to be acquired? By reading- and hard study, and making an application of the knowledge ac- quired. Knowledge is power, in agri- culture as well as other things; and how are you to get knowledge? Only by reading, study, and application. With knowledge, you can use the hand as well as the tongue more effectively. You must learn the use of tools. A man that has a perfect use of tools, can do double the work one can who knows nothing about their use. Rail- roads and steamboats have brought men together, and have furnished a partial remedy for want of books. I would ask you, can you tell what the farmer is now gaining by the use of manures and by the knowledge re- ceived through agricultural papers? Or can you tell what is lost to Georgia by not taking the agricultural papers, and keeping up with the improvements of the day? By reading agricultural pa- pers, each farmer may learn and prac- tice all the improvements of every farmer in the State. Who would not subscribe and pay for an agricultural paper, for such a reward as that? No man has a right to put his light under a bushel. Farmers, come out, and let your lights shine! If you can not afford to give it away by contribu- ting to The Soutiiekx Cultivator, put it in book form and sell it. If you have improved tools, take out patents for them, and sell the rights, or give them to the public. Y'oung men, read, practice, and qual- ify yourselves for one of the noblest of callings. Do not commence where your fathers did, but where they are now, and where the best farmers in the State are, and being young, active and vigorous, make every effort to sur- pass the best. Be assured "there is much to learn yet. The three great essentials are: first the theory (true plan) of farming; sec- ond, the art of controlling labor, and executing all work to the best advan- tage with least labor; third (last and best), success depends on quick per- ception, wise judgment, that seldom or never errs. How is this to be acquired except by the use of books, in conjunc- tion with practice? In conclusion, I may say, to succeed, you not only must be superior to your laborers, but you must be so far ahead of them that they shall know that your plans are wise, easy to put in practice, and certain of success. Then they will follow in a charge, as good sol- diers will the best of generals. The laborer must have confidence in the man that directs. How are all these qualifications secured? I repeat, through books, hard study, observation and practice." DAVID DICKSON. CHAPTER I. The Farm. The farmer should select a farm of fertile soil, or soils capable of illimita- ble fertilization. It will not pay to cultivate poor or exhausted lands. If not productive, they must be made so by proper treatment. It has been clearly demonstrated that certain soils are especially adapted to certain crops. Corn will grow better and make better yields on certain classes of soil than on other and different soils. The same is true of cotton. One farm will successfully produce grain crops, while another grows cotton more profitably. The farm land and quality of soil should be selected in view of the crops proposed to be raised. For the growth of corn I would select a soil of black prairie, blue limestone, brown or mulatto soil with a moderate gravel; also, what is called strong land of the river bottom. I would prefer brown or mulatto land — with moderate gravel, for cot- ton. The subsoil should not be reten- tive of water, but should let the water percolate through, but not open enough to leach the land. From my observa- tion I find this kind of land more pro- ductive. I find such soil makes the stalks more bushy and prolific, and bear better through the season. The fruit comes thicker on the limbs, and there is less falling of squares. The most sandy lands may be profitably cultivated by sticking the particles of sand together with vesretahle mold; and it would be a si-eat addition to add muck or river mud, or any other substance that would measurably ad- here the sand, and make it dark enough to prevent reflection, and close enough to hold the water. Cotton can be cultivated on sand in this way. Sandy land, I consider the lowest grade, and the sandier the land the lower the grade. For wheat, I would take the very same soil as for cotton. Wheat will succeed better on the heavier lands than cotton. For oats, the same may be said. I do not think there is any particular difference between oat soils and wheat soils, but oats will errnw hptfer on low, flat lands than wheat. Wheat requires land that is better drained, either by natural or artifi- cial means. Rye will grow anywhere corn will, and do better on light or sandy soil than wheat or oats. The farm should, by actual or imag- inary lines, be laid off into divisions so as to be cultivated on the five-field system. I would have a permanent pasture. One field should rest, one field should have cotton, one corn, and one small grain. I would put in cotton after rest, corn after cotton, small grain af- ter corn, and rest after small grain. If you have only five fields and wish to keep up the vegetable mold to a de- sirable standard, sow peas after the crop is off, always using commercial THE FARM. 17 fertflizers as the most desirable in all kinds of farming. In using commer- cial fertilizers you should not over- look the point of saving home ma- nures. The more manures bought, the more home manures should be saved and applied to the farm. One of the objects in the system of rotation of crops recommended, is seen from the fact that all plants do not receive the same kind of material from the soil; one kind draws more phosphate and another more ammonia, and some draw very liftle of either. If you were to plant one kind of crop alone j'ou would soon exhaust the land of that particular kind of nutritive element required. I would let the land rest in order for it to accumulate vegetable mold, and to make it pro- duce more, annually, than it would without rest, and thus save labor. The vegetable mold would keep the land open and porous and soft so that the roots could penetrate through it. I would plant cotton after rest, be- cause the land is then in a better con- dition for the cotton, there being no corn stalks in the way, and less crab- grass, to obstruct its growth. Expe- rience has also shown that the land, when cultivated in cotton after rest, will produce a healthier weed, and will retain water better to keep guano soluble. The vegetable mold darkens the soil so that it will receive the heat better and keep it up better during the twenty-four hours. It does not throw the rellection of the sun back on the plants to burn and scorch them. The vegetable mold in the land from the rest is becoming soluble the year round, and during the growth of the crop, and when partially decayed it acts like a sponge in holding the water and letting it out gradually to the roots of the plants. If there should be a surplus of water, it leaves the land porous enough for the water to pass through into the sub- soil and prevent its damaging the crops. It is proved by experience that corn grows better after cotton than after any other plant, and that it is more easily cultivated. It makes heavier and sounder corn. Corn, when culti- vated on m.v system, leaves the land in a beautiful condition, and there is less labor necessary to prepare the land for small grain. The corn crop could be gathered in time for the small grain, while the cotton crop could not, and these are the only two summer crops. The reason that I pre- fer rest to succeed small grain is be- cause the land is then smooth, no open furrows to wash, and is covered with stubble and small grass to protect it. Waist-High Grain. CHAPTER II. General Treatment of Lands. Herein lies the main secret — the source of success or failure in all agri- cultural pursuits. As a single item or specification in my system of farming, I attach more real importance and practical value to the treatment of lands than to any other one subject connected with the study and practice of agriculture; and to my special at- tention to and method of treating my lands, do I, in a very important sense, attribute my aggregate successful re- sults as a farmer. It is a part — an essential component of my theory and plan of farming; and to dispense with its due consideration and practice, would simply amount to disparage- ment of success in the whole enter- prise. We have sketched the Farm, the adaptation of crops to soils; the quali- fication of the farmer for planning and executing the work, and the im- portance of framing his operations upon rational and scientific bases; and we come now to the ground-work — the gi-and basis of permanent and aggregate success in all farming. There is no point or step co-equal in Importance, in view of successful farming, with that of proper and con- servative treatment of lands. , It con- stitutes the mainspring, — the essential policy in all farming. It is the first lesson for the planter to learn, and an imperative duty that he may not, with impunity, neglect — to keep his lands tillable — in good healthy state for cultivation. In common routine farming, the treatment of lands, to the end of im- proving or even keeping them up to a healthy standard — is most wofully neglected, or misdirected through want of scientific guidance. To cul- tivate poor land is folly. It can not pay. If not rich, it must be made fertile; and if it be rich, it must, by proper treatment, be kept in good heart, and constantly improved in fer- tility. It must not, by neglect or mis- management or by botchery, be per- mitted to run down and exhaust it- self, as is too true of a very large acreage of the lands of Georgia and the South, which are now refusing to produce paying ci'ops — and purely for the want of conservative and scientific treatment. There are just as many ways to preserve and improve land as to waste it; and by close economy and indus- try, you can gather the fertilizing ele- ments much fast;pr than they are wasted by the crops. Nature helps to waste, and helps to return. The rains leach and wash away fertility, while plants and evaporation from the sea, return it to some extent, to the land. Hence, let everything made on the farm, after it is used or eaten, except the lint of cotton — which takes away nothing from the soil, be re- turned to the land. In addition, gather muck, scrapings of swamps, leaves and pine-straw, and carry to the nearest field, and scatter broadcast. Don't be afraid of mud and pine-straw GENERAL TREATMENT OF LANDS. 19 hurting your land — heat and moisture will make it right. All vegetable mat- ter placed on your fields, will, in due time, turn to corn and cotton. Handle manure as little as possible but han- dle a great deal of it. The field is the place to make it, the plough to stir it, and the sun and water to turn it into corn and cotton. But before putting it on your fields in this way, use enough muck and straw in your stock-yards to absorb the ammonia of the stock drippings, and take up the urine, and have as much of this saved — under shelter — as possible. Once a week sprinkle it with plaster. Do not handle it or pile it. The first time you stick your fork in it, pitch it in the wagon and carry it to the field. Make every lick count. Manure loses every time it is turned or moved. Let all your spare time be spent in gath- ering new lots of manure. Carry to the nearest field at once, but not to the lot to get twice as heavy by the addition of water. I prefer this diffuse and economical method of applying this valuable class of manures, to that of raking and shoveling and loading and carrying to the compost heap — and then penning and sheltering, and then again tearing down, loading and hauling to the field. Let it lie under the shelter till break- ing or planting time and haul immedi- ately to the field; this saves labor that might be more profitably em- ployed in gathering up other manures. Instead of ^penning stock to make ma- nures, let them range the fields. Leave a shade-tree for every twenty-five acres of cleared land. The stock will feed until full, then go to the shade to rest. They drop but little manure till they get in motion — twenty to one hundred yards from the tree. Place salt over the field in right places. Pen your straw and shucks in occa- sional places over the field, that the stock may gather and litter around them. The cheapest and best plan to save manure from stock while graz- ing or eating off crops from fields, is to have the manure dropped by the stock where it is eaten. The urine soaks into the soil at once, and the excrement, like a post, commences rotting at the surface next the ground, and being covered by the sounder part, the earth absorbs the ammonia as fast as formed. Stock while graz- ing, drop manure regularly over the field, and the object of giving them shade-trees is to keep them out of the swamp. I contend that this plan gives cheaper manure, more beef and less labor than any other. Use ma- nures everywhere you plow and plant, except in a hole of water, or on a rock. If you cultivate land, it will pay to use manure, and it will pay best on lands that' pay best without it; the safest without manure is the safest with manure; and your labor will be more certainly rewarded by using ma- nure on all the land you plant. You can and must accumulate manures in the same ratio as you buy it — the more you purchase the more you can make at home. To get the full benefit of manures, lands must be rested to grow weeds, and accumulate vegetable mold. Also, use it on the pea crop for the same purpose. Peruvian guano and other strong ni- trogenous manures will exhaust land under any bad or erroneous system of farming. The mixture I recommend, under a good system, will make land rich. The use of guano or other commer- cial fertilizers is objected to by some — thinking it lessens the interest in home-made manures. It should be made the means of doubling the wheat and oat straw, producing twice the quantity of weeds where land is at rest, doubling the quantity of peas and vines — and the more of all such manures produced and saved, the bet- ter guano will pay. I am in favor of making the land produce double what it now produces, instead of doubling the number of laborers by the impor- tation of Chinese. — Double the pro- ductiveness of land, and it will be worth four times the present value. We want more manure, and the cities of the South can furnish it in pou- drette, and add greatly to the health of the places. Resting Lands — By this we mean, allowing it to lie without cultivation for one or more crop seasons, and al- lowing it to grow up in grass and weeds. This spontaneous crop — cov- ering the land well over during spring 20 DICKSON'S SYSTEM OF FARMING. and summer, and rotting and decom- posing during the winter and spring, produces quite an amount of soluble vegetable matter for replenishing the exhausted quantum of vegetable mold and humus, without which in the soil no laud can claim productiveness, or any course of manuring prove of much benefit. This dry vegetable matter turned into the soil likewise furnishes traces of ammonia and other fertile elements whic^ tend to enliven and recuperate the soil. Such supply of vegetable matter is important for keeping the soil mellow and porous, so that it will readily take ii? the rainfall, with its fertile grasses, and allow the crop-roots to penetrate and pervade it. It prevents lands from baking after heavy rains, and quickly becoming hard and crusty and im- permeable to the atmosphere. The treatment of the various classes of soils does not vary so much as might be supposed. Extremes are likely to meet, and rest exerts differ- ent valuable effects upon different lands aside from its general uniform results. Let a sandy soil rest to accu- mulate vegetable mold, to turn the soil dark and enable it to receive the heat, and prevent reflection and burn- ing what is above ground; to hold a uniform heat, and so fasten the parti- cles of sand together as to enable the soil more readily to receive and hold moisture — all of which effects are im- portant besides the real and perma- nent increase of fertility. On the other hand, rest a clay soil not only to accumulate vegetable mold and de- posit fertile elements, but to darken the soil — as in case of sandy lands — open the particles of clay, and thus pulverize the soil so as to receive the rains, let in the air, light and gases, and enable it to imiformly re- tain heat and moisture. All lands should be rested at least one year in four; and the best time for rest is after small-grain crops. To make it more positively beneficial, treat it as follows: After taking off the grain crop, pasture the balance of the year. Rest from January to June or July the year after; then plant peas with manure; then feed off with stock. It will pay all interest and cost, and leave the land better for the next crop. The year after, plant in cotton, then in corn, and then in small grain, and again rest. Rotation of Crops. — The crops upon all lands should be changed occasion- ally; and it is practically important to change them every year under some regular system of rotation — such as my Five Field System, hereafter to be mentioned in these pages. Rota- tion of crops not only materially as- sists in furnishing the requisite sup- ply of vegetable mold and humus — the standard of which must be kept up — but is likewise important in a chemical sense. One object in the system of rotation of crops recommended is seen from the fact that all plants do not receive the same kind of material from the soil. One crop draws more phosphate, and another more ammonia, and some very little of either. If you were to plant one kind of corn alone for a number of years, it would soon ex- haust the land of that particular nu- tritive element required. For instance, the clean culture of cotton lessens the supply and exhausts the nitrogen in the same proportion; but a crop of wheat or oats or corn, with the addi- tional crop of grass and weeds, will replace all these exhausted elements — organic matter and ammonia, and besides, will furnish the soil phos- phoric acid. Hence the benefit ac- cruing from change of crops — not only to the present crop — but pefmanent improvement of the land. Rotation is a means of material importance in keeping up the land to a healthy and fertile standard, and can not, with impunity, be neglected by any practi- cal agriculturist. CHAPTER III. Fertilization of Soils and Crops. . I repeat, with emphasis, the practi- cal importance of the two means sug gested in last chapter for keeping up and positively enriching lands. I refer to rest and rotation. All these pi'oced- ures directly furnish the soil with vegetable matter, and certain fertiliz- ing elements — thus imitating the pro- cess of nature in the formation of ori- ginal or virgin soil. As an essential prelude to all direct and positive steps toward fertilizing the farm, we must mention proper drainage — ditching of the hillsides and draining the bottoms with deep and deeper plowing every year — in addi- tion to the incorporation of vegetable mold in the soil as above directed, even if you have to resort to two green crops on the same land the same year; but be sure to turn your land deeply and subsoil it every year. Return the proceeds of all crops to the land — as near as possible — including cotton- seed, pea-vines, wheat straw, etc. Make as much manure under shelter as pos- sible, using straw, leaves and other lit- ter to absorb the whole of the urine and excrement of the stock and no more. Utilize to the extent of your teams, all the scrapings from fence cor- ners, swamp mud, muck out of the ponds and bottoms, spreading it over the lands; all barn-yard manure, pre- served under shelter, and other rich scrapings. Everything made on the place after it is used or eaten, except the lint of cotton, which really takes nothing from the soil, must be returned to the land. Use commercial manures on all cropL planted, up to from one hundred to one thousand pounds per acre of "Dickson's Compound," which will be noticed di rectly on these pages. Soils are not to be considered up to their full capac- ity until you have twelve inches of soil and six inches of subsoil. It is a good plan to subsoil at least one-fourth of your crop lands every year. The greatest of all the means of im- proving lands is to use liberally the commercial manures every year, and on all crops planted, because you not only improve the land, but it will also pay you to use them out of the crops grown. I consider this the "philoso- pher's stone" in all farming. You may talk of machinery for saving labor but there is no such thing as labor-sav- ing where the liberal use of manure is neglected. No machinery can possibly compromise the importance and abso- lute necessity of manures in all farm- ing operations. They permanently im- prove lands, and at the same time, pay their own cost on every crop, and bring in clear net profits to reward labor and enterprise. But at the same time, while I consider annual application of good crop-gi'owing manures the great- est and cheapest means of saving la- bor, (hpy give you capital to increase your labor-saving machinery in the same proportion that they increase your crops. I would not deter the 22 DICKSON'S SYSTEM OF FARMING. farmer from all labor-saving ma- chinery. I look upon manures and machinery as the best means by which we can add to our present labor. There are several points of impor- tance connected with the application of commercial manures as crop growers in order to obtain full fertilizing bene- fits. By former treatment of the lands, the soil must be properly imbued with vegetable matter and especially of vegetable mold, in order to prepare it for the process of chemical assimila- tion. When applied to worn down and exhausted soils, it fails to produce its full fertilizing effects; and, hence in routine farming it is frequently said of it that it "burns up the crops and ex- hausts the soil." This is all for the want of sufficiency of vegetable mat- ter to support and bring out the fertile powers of the guano. The absolute ne- cessity is proper system of farming. In my practice, and on my farms, these manures have always paid me good profit besides steadily improving my land. It is a great mistake to say "guano has exhausted and ruined my land." It was exhausted before the guano was applied, and, hence, the failure was attributable to the farmer in using guano on lands that had an in- sufficient supply of vegetable mold to support the guano and develop its fer- tilizing effects. The richest barn-yard compost may as signally fail in the hands of an ignorant routinist whose lands are never rested and whose depth of soil is only two inches instead of eighteen. Peruvian Guano — Is obtained from Peru and the Chincha Islands. The prevalent opinion is that this guano is the deposit of birds. My own opinion is, that this deposit is a natural forma- tion, the same as coal, iron, plaster, gold, etc., in those countries where they would be preserved for their pres- ent use. My reason for this opinion is founded on the enormous quantities of this deposit. In making a calculation of the number of birds that could set on these islan'ds and feed within a rea- sonable distance of each other, they never could have gotten a sufficient quantity of fish to produce the phos- phates and ammonia that are fovmd in the island, containing, as these guanos do, on an average, 16 per cent, of am- monia and 30 per cent, of bone earth. I have not the means of ascertaining the exact amount, but several millions of tons have long since been taken from these islands, and still the sup- ply is not exhausted. Now, if a few birds have accumulated all this — occu- pying not more land than one or two counties to feed on — what can the whole multitude of farmers do, with their stock spread over the whole globe? I say, that they can make every acre rich, if they will. Providence intended the earth should increase in fertility as rapidly as it does in population. Every man. that assists in removing this dor- mant guano, lying idle and useless on the Chincha Islands, and puts it in cir- culation, creating therewith food and clothing, is a benefactor to his kind. The country suffers for want of a share of the surplus fertilizing material. Re- move the deposit, and apply it to our crops, and it will enrich the land, and even that which escapes will enrich the atmosphere, to be gathered in again by growing plants. As already stated, in my practice, I have found Peruvian guano the best fertilizer I have ever used; and as in a large majority of manures, its princi- pal value consist in the amount of ni- trogen and ammonia it cor;\tains. Not undervaluing other substances, yet I consider ammonia at the, head of the list. I commenced the use of guano in 1846, and gradually increased the use of it until the present time — never hav- ing omitted to use it on my crops ex- cepting the last years of the war, when I could not obtain it. With a proper system of rotation of crops, and return- ing all the crops to the land, except the lint of the cotton, land may be im- proved with Peruvian guano alone, but not so fast as when you combine with the soil all the elements of the plants to be grown. Ammonia being necessary for all plants, I know of no crop that it would not benefit. It will pay the best upon those crops that bring the most money — cotton being that crop in this section, and tobacco in other sec- tions. The direct fertilization of lands is ef- fected by various manures, ",ottonseed. FERTILIZATION OF SOILS AND CROPS. 23' and a long list of commercial and ma- nipulated compounds. But as I am proposing simply to fur- nish the reader my own system of farming, I shall restrict my notice of manures to those only that I have used in my own practice, and which from long experience and successful results I can commend as valuable and relia- ble fertiiizers. Ammonia — Is certainly the most val- uable manure known to agriculture. I consider it the best crop grower, and the mainspring that puts all the rest in action. As already noticed, it abounds in Peruvian guano, and is the special ingredient that makes this guano solu- ble as a fertilizer. It is largely fur- nished by barn-yard manures and com- posts and also by cottonseed, and hence the value of these substances as strong and powerful fertilizers. The manure heap and the compost of lot manure and cottonseed attach their chief value as fertilizers and crop growers to the ammonia evolved. Am monia is contained in the atmosphere and by the rain-fall is carried down and diffused in the soil. It is an ingre- dient of one of the components of the atmosphere, and an element in all plants. It is supplied to the soil bv decomposition of plants and, hence the fertilizing value of green crops turned into the soil. The soil incor- porates the ammonia and holding it as a fertile element, feeds it to the grow- ing crops. Ammonia being the most easily ex- hausted of all manures, it requires an- nual application to the soil for suste- nance and growth of annual crops, and yet its impress is permanent upon the soil. Witness for instance, the lasting fertile effect of a pile of cottonseed or heap of wheat-straw upon a certain spot of ground. . It will show itself for ten years to come, and hixuriant crops will annually mark the spot. Hence, we say of ammonia, it is the chief of all the crop-growers, and the most substantial fertilizing element known to the farmer and horticultur- allst. Dissolved Bones — I consider second in phosphates or value as a fertilizer — it being one of the most important in- gredients in the chemical composition of the grain and seeds of plants. This substance forms the basis of many of the most valuable commercial phos- phates and compounds now in popular use as fertilizers. Of these their value depends on their solubility. While in- soluble they are worthless to growing crops. Potash — 'I consider of third rate, or mere nominal value as a fertilizer, compared \frith ammonia and the phos- phates. It is not of much value as a crop-grower, but seems to act benefi- cially upon some soils by dissolving and thus reducing some of the inor- ganic and mineral substances of the soil to an assimilable condition. Land Piaster and Salt. — We mention these, not as positive fertilizers, but as in some sense, adjuncts to the two prominent fertilizers last mentioned. These will pay their cost; but their greatest value consists in keeping the other manures active, preventing rust and assisting crops in standing dry weather. With sufficiency of the above-named manures, viz.: ammonia, dissolved bones, land plaster and salt, the crops will be enabled to find most of the other ingredients necessary for their development and maturity. It is ad- mitted that every article composing the plant must be present in the soil, but I do not think that they should be in exact quantities. It will do to have more of one ingredient and less of an- other. My favorite 'compound' — pres- ently to be noticed, is about as near perfect — in point of supplying everj' element of plant food — as a manure can be made. It does not put you to the trouble of getting all the ingre- dients of plants and combining them, the four principal ones enabling the plant to find the others that are neces- sary. Should they fail, all economical means should be used to find out what particular item is wanting and sup- ply it. "Dickson's Compound." — Twenty- years of diligent research and study of the laws of nature as applied to agri- culture, with the experimental use of Peruvian and other guanos upon soils and crops. I have determined upon the following combination of commercial manures as the best and most valuable for all crops: •24 DICKSON'S SYSTEM OF FARMING. Formula, "Dickson's Compound." Peruvian Guano 100 pounds Dissolved Bones 100 pounds Common Salt 100 pounds Land Plaster 50 pounds Well mixed. This compound I have now been us- ing for many years upon all my farm crops, and unfailingly with satisfac- tory results. In my hands and under my system of farming, this compound has never failed to grow me good crops and bring me satisfactory dividend's. It has always paid me, and my clear profits have always been larger in pro- portion to the amount of the compound applied — up to one thousand pounds per acre. I have long since learned not to fear failure of making paying crops no matter the season. This year, (1869) has been the dryest year that I have known since I have been farming, there having fallen very little rain since the 27th of April. At this time, November the 8th — many branches and creeks on my place have not a drop of water in them. My mill has not turned since the first of May. and there is not a drop of water in the pond, though I have an unusually tight dam. It has been one of the best years for testing the value of the different modes of farming, in my whole farm- experience. The negroes have notions of their own, and I have thought proper to let them be convinced of the value of the "compound" by their own experi- ments. Some of them have used on a portion of the crop, bone and Peruvian guano alone, others used on the bal- ance of the crop the full "compound." They are enabled now — at any time day or night — to see the difference be- tween the effects of the full "com- pound" and the bone and Peruvian guano alonC' — the crops grown with the compound grew better, kept greener, made larger ears of corn and more of them, and finer cotton. This year has been considered one of the most disastrous for rust, but I have had less rust this year than usual, not exceeding one or two per cent, on the plantation, and having a great deal of land that is subject to rust. I tried this year an experiment on a plot of land that failed to make cotton fifty- two years ago. I planted that plat on the nineteenth and twentieth of May, and the cotton on it was flourishing, with no rust, except on about one-half of an acre of the water-oak land on one edge. It has produced the largest bolls of any cotton on the plantation, having used about 800 pounds of the "com- pound" to the acre. This plat has pro- duced I believe, and all visitors think so too, no less than one bale per acre. It would require no less than 400 lbs. of the compound to do this, still any one will find that it will pay a good in- terest on the money to use a thousand pounds of the compound per acre. No man should object to making an invest- ment in this compound when he is paid from four to ten times the interest on his money that he would get by loan- ing it to a bank, a railroad or his neigh- bor. The true test for deciding what is the most profitable amount of ma- raire to be used, is to take off the legal rate of interest on the amount that is used, and then count the dollars they have made over, and not the per cent, that any given quantity makes. For instance, you would use one hundred pounds of it to the acre, the cost being, say, four dollars per hundred pounds, the interest would be twenty-eight cents; it would gain six dollars, mak- ing one hundred and fifty per cent. There is six dollars made per acre above the rate of interest. If you use 400 pounds per acre at a cost of $16, the interest is $1.12. If it only gained one hundred per cent there is $16, showing $14.88 clear profit. I admit that there would be a less per centage, but the estimate is made in order to show that the profit is greater the more guano If used after deducting the legal rate of interest until you reach the amount of about one thousand pounds per acre. In each of these calculations, the labor is the same, and a large crop is as eas- ily gathered as a small one. Large ears of corn are more easily gathered than small ones, and the same is true of perfect bolls of cotton. In addition to this, you have the advantage of the great stimulus to work that a fine cot- ton and corn crop gives to the laborers. This compound I have used on all sorts of crops. I used it because I con- sider it the most perfect compound. FERTILIZATION OF SOILS AND CROPS. 25 and combining more, appropriately the several chemical elements entering into the composition of, and necessary for the sustenance, growth and devel- opment of the several farm-crops. In answer to the question frequently asked, to what class of lands is your compound applicable? I desire to state, that I have used it successfully and with remunerative results upon all my lands, including every variety of soil to be found in Middle Georgia. My lands extend from the granite hills in Hancock county, to the rotten lime- stone and long moss in Washington County; from red, rocky hills, to a blowing sand twenty feet to the clay, and from a mulatto soil to a pipe clay; and tell you if a farmer can make corn and cotton on- a blowing sand, he can make them anywhere above water — off of a solid rock. So my compound is well-nigh applicable to all farm lands. Can any man believe that ammonia and phosphates would even fail where a plow ought to run? I have been of- ten asked. Wbat kind of land pays best with guano? I have but one reply — "land that pays best without it;" Land could be so rich, that sixteen hundred pounds of ammonia would make but a small per centage of profit on investment; but we have none such in Georgia. Land can be improved, and eventu- ally ma'de rich, under proper system of treatment and culture, by atmospheric agencies alone. But this agency can be greatly quickened by the compound. The better drained and preserved the soil, and the deeper ploughed, the more rapidly the land can be improved. The ammonia and carbonic acid of the at- mosphere, continually formed and de- posited in the land, will yearly improve the crops, which under proper rotation, will leave more in the soil than they take from it. The richer a soil grows, the more will the plants grown upon it take from the atmosphere, and the more rapidly can its fertility be in- creased. I do not underrate the value of any manure that supplies the ele- ments necessary to make a perfect grain of corn or cottonseed; but I do attach superior importance and value to ammonia and carbon or vegetable matter. In some classes of lands containing an excess of lime and other minerals, continued cultivation without the ap- plication of ammonia in some form seems to tire in productiveness and ap- parently become exhausted. This ex- cess of mineral supplies in the soil ren- ders all nitrogenous matters soluble, and the supply of ammonia is soo?t given off to the plants, whilst the ma- nure has not been returned. Sow such lands down in cowpeas or clover, treated as already directed, and in two years the exhausted lands will be re- stored almost to virgin productiveness; ammonia is known to be the great crop-grower, but to command it, you must have all the necessary salts con- tained in the various crops. The more nitrogen or ammonia you store away in your land, the more you can obtain from the atmosphere. I advocate mixing the valuable es- sential manures to grow perfect plants, as in my compound; but if you use only one, let that be ammonia, as it is the best and cheapest; but as it will be materially assisted by soluble bone, I add it in my formula, and also land plaster and salt. I think my compound well nigh a perfect manure, and would be quite so with plenty of potash in the land, or it was added by sowing ashes. To be successful in agriculture the farmer must know where all the ele- ments of plants are, and how to con- trol them. Plow deep and subsoil, use all possi- ble manures to be had on the place, and purchase largely of the best ma- nures in the market. Get manures, as perfect plant-growers as can be found; but you must have ammonia and solu- ble bone. With these, or my com- pound, you will have no use for second breaking. I am friendly to all pure guanos 5n their natural state, but prefer mixing them myself, and saving the profit, and for one, will buy that manure that pays the best. It is not recorded in my book of practice that, by adding a fer- tilizer to land. T kill that land. Fair, practical tests have decided in favor of ammonia as the chief of all known fertilizers. Under Northern and European systems, the farmers are improving their lands almost exclu- sively by increasing their supplies of 26 DICKSON'S SYSTEM OF FARMING. ammonia, growing hay, clover, oat;; and rye, and keeping stock to eat these crops annually, not gaining, but losing phosphates, and gaining nitrogen, mak- ing the land rich, and the land making the owner rich with luxuriant and abundant crops. In English agriculture, ammonia is the foundation as taken from the atmosphere, from Peruvian guano, from the turnip, hay, clover, etc., returning merely the bone earth by ammonia, which last is constantly increasing in its relative amount. With a little ammonia we can gather large amounts every year, getting larger returns from year to year, by adding a little ammonia annually, and getting good dividends on the invest- ment. I believe strongly in natural laws. Study nature, trace all things from cause to effect, and from effect to cause; but take no such extreme views as some do, advocating surface manur- ing because the trees drop their leaves on the ground, and hence, it is nature's plan to manure, the surface. At all events add a little science, experience and art to assist, instead of invalidat- ing the wisdom of natural laws. To command and use ammonia in the best and most economical way, both for permanently improving the farm, and getting large crop dividends, you must have five fields: Five-Field System. — 'First, a perma- nent pasture; one for cotton, one for corn, one for small grain, one at rest. The field that rested last year, put in cotton with 300 or more pounds of the compound, or some guano, per acre. The fiel'd that was in cotton last year, plant in corn, manuring with the cot- tonseed, putting in the middles cow- peas at the proper season for manur- ing the crop that follows, and it will pay to manure them for this purpose with the compoimd. The field that was in com last year should be sown in small grain, with two hundred pounds or more of my compound per acre. The field that had small grain last year should rest after harvest up to from the 1st to 2nth of Julv of the ne-^ year, then put in peas, with one hun- dred and twenty-five pounds of my guano. The method of putting in the peas has^already been given the reader under the head of "General Treatment of Lands." Should you not have time to plant the peas, let the land rest the balance of the year. This will become the cotton field for the next year, whether sown in peas or not. Where clover succeeds, it can be sown with the small grain, and will gather fer- tility faster than the spontaneous growth. Now I will state a different way to prove that ammonia is the cheapest and most expeditious means to renew the fertility of land, and make It pro- ductive. In the first place, I will refer you to clover. Every person knows the effect that clover has on worn land, in a climate where it will grow. The chief things added to the soil by a clover crop, are carbon and ammonia. In the South, the cowpea will answer the same end, if sown early, manured with two hundred pounds of Peruvian guano, and turned under from the 1st of July to the 1st of August ; then at the same time seeded again with peas, us- ing one hundred pounds of guano. Feed off with hogs and beef cattle, which will generally pay for all expenses, and leave the land twenty dollars better — the increase in value, to be decided by the increased production of the next cotton crop, compared with that of a part of the field that you have left un- manured, and not sown with peas. If any man will try this experiment on one acre each way, and fails to get his money back next year, in cotton, 1 will send him the Cultivator during my life. All acknowledge the impor- tance of turning under green crops. The only thing lost by their drying, is their ammonia. I have made money by giving my land one year in four, to gather ammonia and humus. One of the great objects, aside from the immense profits of using commer- cial manures is, that it gives you the means of increasing your composts. It gives you increased feed for stock — in- creases your cottonseed and grasses to be turned under: causes weeds and other things to spring up early in the winter to be turned in the spring with- out any loss or trouble of using green crops. These weeds protect the land from washing during the heavy winter rains. Land washes much less when fertilizers are used, for the reason that they encourage deeper plowing; make FERTILIZATION OF SOILS AND CHOPS. tl three times the amount of litter to pro- tect the land. One of the benefits of shade on land when at rest, that there is a less amount of manures becoming soluble, and less leaching of the land during the year of rest. Cottonseed is very valuable as a manure, being eas- ily decomposed, and returning to its natural elements as food for plants. All articles of a vegetable nature, when reduced to their natural elements, are valuable as fertilizers. Manures are not alone valuable for the food they supply to plants, but they render the land more easy to cultivate and assist the crops in standing either wet weather or dry weather. They cause less friction and resistance to the plough or hoe. Manures I consider one of the best economizers of labor that we can use in a hilly, broken or gullied country — vastly preferable to emigrants, because if the production becomes too great you can abandon the use of them for a season. Barn-Yard Manures. — Except the droppings on the farm, all stock ma- nures should be raised under shelter, as far as practicable, and with as little labor as possible. It should be taken from where it has been deposited and carried directly to where it is to be used, never permitting it to be thrown into the rain, or exposed to the sun to be burned and become of less value. It should be spread on the ground and ap- plied immediately, so that the decom- position shall take place exactly where it is wanted. In this way the earth will take hold of all the gases and other diffusible substance formed, and retain them for the crop. In addition to the droppings of the stock, everything that has been of a vegetable character is of value when applied to the land, and I consider it the cheapest and best method to take it where you find it, and carry it to the nearest place where it can be used. Lime spread over where you have de- posited it, will reduce it to plant food by the aid of heat, light and moisture in sufficient time for the crops, ■which will be a great saving in handling and rehandling it from three to four times, the extra labor being of more value in ircreasing the amount by hunting waste deposits. In manures, as in everything else, the great considera- tion is to economize labor. Haul into your lot, and place in your stalls pine- straw, leaves or litter of any kind, suf- ficient to absorb the ammonia of the stock droppings, and take up the urine, and have as much of this saved under shelter as possible. Once a week sprinkle it with land plaster to help dissolve the matter and retain the am- monia. Do not pile or handle it. Pitch it into the cart and carry it to the field. Make eveiy lick count. Manure loses every time it is turned. Employ your idle labor in gathering up scrapings of manure and deposits from every possi- ble source. The Chicken for the Farm. CHAPTER IV. Organic and Inorganic Manures. These are the two recognized and distinct classes of manures, and we de- sire to consider them respectively, in comparison to value as crop growers. Inorganic manures, such as lime, pot- ash, phosphates, etc., are the basis of all fertility and where they abound in considerable quantities will enable plants to gather and appropriate much more of the organic manures. But plants and seeds are not always made up of specific quantities, any more than a hog is. Take a fat hog, weigh- ing three hundred pounds, and one of the same age very poor, weighing one hundred pounds. Analyze the two, and note the difference in proportion of all the parts, according to the weight of each animal. How various the pro- portions of bone, nitrogen, carbon, etc. The same disproportion holds good as to cottonseed, the different plants, wood, etc., as to weight and to the in- crease when applied to crops. Farmers, and others not acquainted with chemistry, can ascertain the rela- tive proportion of the organic and in- organic substances by the use of fire. For instance, take ten bushels cotton- seed, and reduce them to ashes by fire. Having weighed them before reducing them, weigh the ashes that are left; the amount set free comes from the at- mosphere, and constituted the organic elements of the seed — the ashes re- maining represents the inorganic ele- ments. To ascertain the respective value of these, as food for crops, is done by applying the ashes of the ten bushels cottonseed just burned to a given quantity of land — noting the in- crease of crop products; and then ap- plying ten bushels green cottonseed to the same quantity of land — deducting the per cent, made over nothing. This will show what was produced by the organic matter of the ten bushels seed, in contradistinction to what was pro- duced by the inorganic constituent of the same quantity of seed. As already stated, what is true of cottonseed, holds true with other seeds, and all vegetable matter. My opinion is that, one bushel of raw cottonseed is worth for the growth of plants, as much as the ashes of one hundred bushels of burnt seed. This I consider a fair test of the difference in value between the phosphates and alkalies on the one hand, and carbon and ammonia on the other. I had four hundred thousand pounds of cot- ton and seed burned in one house. The whole residue — as manure — was not worth to me as much as one thousand pounds of seed. As another instance, illustrating the disproportionate value of organic and inorganic substances as crop-growers: Take the manure of ten horses one year, dropped under cover, and set free of all organic parts by burning — there- by wasting the ammonia. Then take the droppings from a like number of horses, dropped in like manner. Use this on twenty acres cotton — use the other on twenty acres the same kind of land — then plant twenty acres with- ORGAMC AND INORGANIC MANURES. 29 out any manure. Cultivate all exactly alike, and the difference in crop prod- ucts will be a fair test between phos- phates and ammonia as a fertilizer. The only discount on this test is the fact that the commercial phosphates are mostly insoluble — the ammonia be- ing alv/ays soluble, or will be in due time, which is a great item in favor of ammonia. With a full supply of nitrogenous and carbonaceous matter, corn and cotton, etc., may be made with much less, in proportion, of potash and bone earth. Take a cord of black-jack wood off a poor pine or black-jack ridge, where there is but little organic matter, aiul set the organic matter free by burn- ing the wood; then take the second cord of black-jack from a rich bottom, vvnere the organic matt'i^r abounds rn great quantities, an'd relatively in much greater proportion to the inor- ganic matter; burn this as you did the first cord. The cord of wood from the poor land, will contain nearly double the quantity of phosphate of lime and potash that exists in the wood from the rich land. All soapmakers have found this true as to potash. All these experimental facts, taken with our experience with the fertiliz- ing results of turning under clover, peas and other vegetable crops, prove unmistakably that ammonia is the cheapest and most expeditious means of renewing the fertility of land, and making it productive, in comparison with the commercial phosphates, which are so generally insoluble as to prove almost worthless. Finding from the above experiment that such a large proportion of plants come from the atmosphere, we are taught the reason why we should grow green crops and other crops to be turned into the land, and from every source to let as much atmosphere into the soil as possible; because the more organic matter we have in the soil, the more we can command annually from, the atmosphere. * * * I am for an annual manure — a soluble manure — one that will return the principal, or at least seventy-five per cent, of it, with one hundred and twenty-five per cent, profit, or double the investment. I am in favor of an investment that never pleads for time, or complains of usurious interest, or calls for relief or repudiation, but will punctually square up accounts, with one hundred per cent, profit. Such an investment is soluble bones and Peru- vian guano. Lend it to your land, in sums of from five to fifteen dollars per acre, at six to nine months' time,, and if you do your duty— plough deep and cultivate shallow — the payment will be sure. Your land will be left in better condition; money will be furnished to put back the same amount of manure the. next year, and ample dividends made to live on and make other invest- ments. The word "stimulate" is im- properly applied to manures. Plants have no nerves for them to act upoii< When you see plants growing very rap- idly, to which manure has been ap- plied ; do not think they are drunk. The truth is, the manure is soluble, and not permanent; and the roots of the plants are absorbing it, and the blades work- ing it up for the crop. I have no use for a permanent manure. If perma- nent, it is not soluble; if not soluble, it never will enter the roots of the plants; and if it does not enter the roots of the plants, your money is gone. No manure is worth a cent, if perma- nent. TTie Atlantic ocean would not be permanent, if its supplies were cut off — if the rain ceased, and all the riv- ers were stopped. Supposing it level at bottom as well as at top, and one thousand feet deep, still it would dry up' in less than two hundred years — a shorter time than some lands in Vir- ginia have been cultivated. So, away with your permanent manures; but be ever vigilant to save all home-made manures possible, of every variety — pine straw and swamp mud included. Manipulate your sandy land with clay, your clay land with vegetable mold. Plough deep, rotate your crops, and rest your lands. Buy liberally of solu- ble manure, and save twice as much as if you tfought none. Is there a sin- gle planter who would lend money to be paid in equal installments of twenty years, with low interest? Yet if he uses permanent manures, he can not- expect much better luck. Is there one that is unwilling to lend his money at six and nine months, have it under his 80 DICKSON'S SYSTEM OF FARMING. control all the time, and get prompt payment — receiving seventy-five per cent, of the principal, and one hundred and twenty-five per cent, profit? Give me the manure that will pay promptly, with good dividends. Do not be afraid that it will exhaust your land. Put the cottonseed back, together with the ma- nure from the straw, corn, oats and ^ shucks, with the straw used to save » the manure and bed the stock; also what the crops got from the atmos- phere. I would like to have my land exhausted in that way. Tliere is only so much corn and cot- ton in any manure, and the sooner you get it the better. It will pay. The loss W'ill be smaller, and only one year's work required. The same is true of land. There is only material enough in it to make a given quantity of corn or cotton, and the greater quan- tity you get each year the better. Do not understand me that I am for ex- hausting land. Not- so. Each year put back more than you take from it. Accumulate a large fund in soluble mold and other manure, and never let it be said by posterity, that it is harder for them to live because you lived be- fore them. Leave your land better than you found it. Improve agricul- ture, so that a given quantity of labor may produce double what it now does — double the capacity of the land. Then each agriculturist will be able to con- sume four times as much as he does at present in necessaries and luxuries. This can be done. During my day the planters in Hancock county have doubled their crops. There were more planters in Hancock county who made ten bales per hand in 1861, than there were who made five bales to the hand in 1845. I repeat, buy Peruvian guano and dissolved bones, and some salt and plaster, where the freight is not too high. Try on a small scale (or large, if you wish) all pure guanos, and be governed by the result. For one, I ■will not touch a manipulated manure. It creates a middle man, to compete with me in bones, guano, etc. If there is anything to be gained by mixing, I want to make it myself and then I know also that it is pure. I want no manure that will not pay, without the addition to it of Peruvian guano. Suppose Dr. Pendleton had mixed his Peruvian guano with sand — half and half — it would have paid two hun- dred and twelve per cent! Good! But four hundred and thirty is better. * * * By using two hundred pounds of Peruvian guano per acre annually, you double the relative products of your growing crops, compared with land fresh from the forest, and with crops that have no guano. Tlierefore, you will get a double proportion from the atmosphere. It is even possible that enriching the land in Europe, has, to some extent, lessened the fertility of the atmosphere in this country. The richer you make your land, the more you can draw from the atmosphere. * * * I do not say this is the only plan, or the best plan; but it is one that will certainly improve your land, and pay good dividends, if you can get reliable labor. You have had my re- ceipt for what I think one of the best manures, except I would add ten pounds of potash, or one bushel of wood ashes. I leave it out for two sea- sons — the scarcity of potash, and the exhausted financial condition of the country. This article is not designed to underrate superphosphates, but to show that ammonia is the cheapest and best of all manures, and that, judg- ing by experience, it will not exhaust land, but may be the means of enrich- ing it. If it fails, it is the man's fault — not that of ammonia. You will find some guanos advertised as permanent manures. I want to avoid that kind, for I think it is true of some of them at least, that when I use them, my crops do not remove them. I prefer the kind that will come to see me the first year, and bring a large interest, in the form of cotton, corn, wheat, etc. The true system in manuring, is to get the manure back the first year, with a living profit, and rapidly im- prove the soil up to its original capac- ity, and carry it beyond that in the same ratio as the increase. We are only tenants at will, and have no right to use the soil in a way to destroy its capacity to maintain the present popu- lation and its future increase. When the people understand the difference in an acre of land that will produce a ORGANIC AND INORGANIC MANURES. 31 hundred pounds, and one that will pro- duce five hundred pounds of lint cotton —that this difference exists in the present value of each of these two acres of land, we then will begin to im- prove our farms. The great inquiry is, on what kind of land to use the guano and other com- mercial manures. I say, use it on all lands you plough or cultivate — or everywhere. * * * All my practice and teaching has been that the use of manures I rec- ommend, gave the farmer the means of making and using double the quanti- ty of home-made manures. I again re- peat this, and as well as I can, with de- moralized labor, still practice upon it. I not only consider it hurtful to the purse, but sinful to waste manures, or not to use the necessary precautions to save them. My motto is, to increase the fertility of the soil in a greater ratio than the population increases. My soil furnishes a portion of the food to raise fish and oysters in the Atlantic ocean, and if I can make a profit and improve my land by using the excre- ment of birds fed on fish, etc., it is my duty as well as my interest to do so. It has been truly said that "the true test of a general was success." I say, it is the only test that will do to try the farmer by. Some writers have greatly misrepresented me, in charging that I overlook the great profits of home-made manures. One reason why I use commercial fertilizers is, that I may save double the quantity of home- made manures. I make double the crops, have twice the amount of forage to feed away, and twice as much cot- tonseed for manure. * * * It is true that I made fine crops be- fore I used guano, bones, salt and plas- ter, but nothing to compare with crops made with them. It is self-sustaining; it is punctual in payments; never re- pudiates or asks an extention of time; wants no stay-laws or military orders; pays promptly, and on an average as much as one hundred and twenty-five per cent, and at other times as high as four hundred. It enables one to make double the quantity of home-made ma- nures: improves the land; gives the means of keeping more and better stock; improves crops: makes the la- borers more cheerful and willing to work; puts money in the hands to do fancy farming; purchases good machin- ery and tools; will afford some luxu- ries as well as substantials; enables you to work freedmen, when they would bring you in debt without it. If I could realize all the profits on $12,000 to $20,000 worth of guano, I could do well throwing in the use of land, horse- power, tools, capital to furnish sup- plies, together with my attention, which alone increases the crop more than one-half. * * * Guano pays back the purchase-mon- ey in cotton lint which is but little loss of matter, and the guano furnishes more than that loss, and leaves a still larger amount in pocket. It enables one to plough twelve inches deep in a thin soil, inasmuch as the guano placed near the roots of plants, gives them vigor to go forth and find the soluble matter that is diffused so thinly through the land: without the use of some concentrated manure, the plant would never have vigor to hunt up the crop food so deeply mixed in the poor land. * * * I will tell you something that guano did for me when I could direct labor and be obeyed. I made per hand ten to fourteen bales of cotton, eight hundred to twelve hundred pounds of pork, one mutton, three-fourths of a fat beef or three hundred pounds, eight to ten colts per year, Jvith corn, wheat, oats, rye, etc., to sell, amounting to $100 per hand; to keep one yoke of fine young oxen for every three hands, to aid in hauling muck, straw, and ma- nure generally: and keep two hundred acres of land under a good fence per hand: six to seven head of cattle, ten to twelve head of hogs, five sheep per hand — all besides being a cotton planter. Instead of penning my stock to make manures, I let them graze the fields, and induced them to keep away from the swamps, by saving shade trees in the fields, and making straw-pens and shuck-pens, and placing salt about in convenient places. Stock while graz- ing, drop manure regularly over the field. I contend that this plan gives cheaper manure, more beef and less labor than any other. This plan paid 32 DICKSON'S SYSTEM OF FARMING. me in astounding profits in meat, ma- nure and dollars, and, conjoined witli other distinctive features of my plan of farming, and have always returned me gratifying results. * * * I invite the reader to an aggre- gate view of my cotton production: Ten thousand persons planting as I do, would produce ten millions of bales of cotton (my crop in 1861 was one thou- sand bales, last year very little less.") The ten millions of bales at the pres- ent price, would give one thousand mil- lions of dollars; one-half of this due to the use of the manure, would place five hundred millions of dollars to its credit; deduct, then, the cost of the manure (one hundred and twenty mil- lions), and it leaves three hundred and eighty millions clear profit, as the land will be benefited to the full amount of all the labor. I like such drains as that — it gives power and profit. * * * In 1861, four thousand planters raising such crops as I did, would have made four millions of bales. Last year, it. would have taken but a few over two thousand planters, to have produced a crop equal to that of 1861 (each making as much as I did) ; so you see the only thing we have to fear, from using guano, and making the most of it, is over-production. * * * We can purchase fifty millions dollars worth of guano in its raw state, and clear one hundred millions of dol- lars on it in nine months, and expend nothing additional in manufacturing cotton and grain out of it. I say, do not let any foreigner have your dollars, when you can with certainty make two dollars in nine months, clear of cost, for every dollar spent. If Dr. Pendleton and others, who seek to show the superior value of phosphates compared with ammonia, are right, what becomes of the green crop manuring? We have been taught to believe that it was the nitrogen added ed that paid for the time and expense. What also became of the rest system? Dr. Pendleton's comments explode that too; nothing of importance being added, but carbon and nitrogen. What becomes of the British turnip system, or the Northern system of growing hay and grain, to feed stock to accumulate nitrogen with a loss of phosphates, etc., to increase future crops? Why does the farmer, when he wishes to turn in a green crop, select the plants that contain the most nitro- gen, such as clover and peas? It is because practice has proven their value. Take one thousand (1,000) bushels of cottonseed, now worth twa hundred dollars, to manure with, set the nitrogen and carbon free by fire, and what would you give for the phos- phates and other salts left? I do not think they could be sold for ten dol- lars. Why is it that the rich lands in Ken- tucky, as they term it, tire when they are full of all mineral manures? I will give you my opinion. It is, that the excess of lime, and perhaps other min- erals, renders all nitrogenous matters soluble. Tlie ammonia is soon given of to the plants, whilst the manure has not been returned. What is the remedy? Sow it down in that nitrogenous plant, clover, and in two years the exhausted land is re- stored almost to virgin productiveness. From the earliest days to the present time, practica proves that nitrogen (ammonia) is the great crop grower. To command nitrogen you must have all the necessary salts contained in the various plants. The more minerals,. the more nitrogen you command; the more nitrogen you store away in your land, the more you can obtain from the atmosphere. Fill your land with humus, to stick the sand together, and to darken it. This will prevent its refiecting the heat, and will cause it to receive it gradually, and part with it in the same way. These are some of the good re- sults, in addition to its manurial quali- ties. With clay land do the same thing, to render it open, and make it ploughable at all times. Plough deep and subsoil. Use all possible manures to be had on the place, and purchase largely of the best manures in the mar- ket. Get manures, as perfect plant- growers as can be found ; but you must have ammonia and soluble bone. ORGANIC AND INORGANIC MANURES. 33 * * * I am for the plant that pre- serves the capital best, and pays the largest dividends. I have no doubt, that on good cotton land, a fair year, I could make one hundred bales of cot- ton, with one No. 1 mule: commence operations the first day of December; subsoil every acre; use twenty -five dol- lars' worth of manure per acre; and finish the 1st of May; cultivate sixty acres. The use of commercial fertilizers is incorrectly objected to by some. Dou- ble the productiveness of the land, and it will be worth four times the present value. Cotton Exhibit at State Fair. CHAPTER V. Breaking Lands. The principal object in brealiing land is to pulverize the soil, and render it mellow and porous. To make it suffi- ciently light and spongy to catch and retain the spring rains for the benefit of the summer crop, for, in cases of hot and dry summers, where there is inadequate rainfall, the growth, devel- opment and final maturity of the crop must depend upon the supply of rain- water stored away by the soil during the winter and spring rains. Another object is to mix the soil; to place the surface and richer soil deep under, where it will attract the crop roots to a depth that will protect them from the heat of summer's sun, and where they will find moisture to en- liven and invigorate them during the summer drought. Proper breaking of lands places the surface litter, and all vegetable matter that has accumulated upon the surface, deep under where they rapidly decom- pose and become soluble plant food. This process, likewise, by turning un- der this accumulation of litter, re- moves it out of the way of the cultiva- tor. It prevents the wasting effects of washing rains during the spring and early summer. The paramount object, however, in all breaking of land, is to so pulverize, mix, deepen and soften the soil as to enable and invite the roots of the planted crops to readily penetrate, tra- verse and permeate the soil in search of such specific elements of food as these plants need for nourishment and growth. The soil belongs to the planted crop, and should be placed in such favorable physical condition as will render all its fertile elements subser- vient to these crops. This consti- tutes the work and real design of the cultivator — to utilize, to the fullest pos- sible extent, the soil and all the adju- vant agencies of nature, for the produc- tion of luxuriant and fruitful crops. Land should be broken from eight to twelve inches. Such as has not been well broken, should be broken every year one or two inches deeper, until you get to the maximum, which I con- sider to be twelve inches, with six inches beyond as subsoil. The advantages of deep breaking are, that it protects the land, and enables it to retain moisture sufficient to carry the plant through any ordinary season of drought. I have never known a year, but that, with proper breaking, proper manuring, and surface culture, you would not make an average crop. There is no such thing as failure, when man does his duty in the premises. Providence has provided all the neces- sary means to make a competency. While the land is fresh broke and por- ous the roots penetrate and occupy the whole of the soil, and come down into the subsoil that is broken. During the cultivation, the rain on the land settles the soil to the roots of the plants, and T?nables them the more completely to draw all the soluble matter out of the earth. The settling on the roots has been proved valuable in more ways BREAKING LANDS. 35 than one. I will only mention the dif- ference in time it takes seed to come up when the earth is pressed closely to them, and when it is scattered loose- ly over them. They will come up in twenty-five to seventy-five per cent. less time when the earth is packed moderately around them. There is a great variety of ploughs, all answering nearly the same purpos^e. The plough that is set so as to scr.ew the land over with the least draft, or to pass it up the inclined plane or mold- board the easiest, is the best. Tlie principal objection to this kind of plough is its liability to break, and its high cost. I find the cheapest plough I have ever used is a wrought-iron turn-plough of the make of the old "Al- len" plough, now called by many peo- ple the "Dixon" turn-plough. It should contain from twenty to thirty pounds of iron, according as to wheth- er you wish to use one or two horses, and cut from seven to ten inches, as you may wish to use one or two horses. I would say, where the soil does not reach more than from tour to ten inches, I would prefer the common long- scooter of four to five inches width to subsoil with, until you obtain a depth of soil of from nine to twelve inches. The reason why I would use the scooter is because it mixes a portion of the soil every year with the subsoil. After a sufficient depth of soil is ob- tained, I should prefer ploughs that are known as subsoil lifters. I have no doubt that subsoiling every year would increase the crops more than if you subsoiled once in a rotation. I would prefer to subsoil every year for cotton, because cotton is the best paying crop, and you would feel the extra cost less. I have subsoiled for both corn and small grain with satis- factory results. Breaking must be commenced in time to do it full and well by plant- ing time. Usually, it should be com- menced by the first of December, and not later than the first of January. In this climate, on my farm in Han- cock county, it is best, taking ten years together, that the breaking be 4one not more than ten days before planting time, this, however, we know to be impracticable in many cases. My reasons for late plough- ing are based on practical observa- tion. In warm, wet winters, the land is much damaged by washing and leaching, by early breaking, and runs together closer than it would if the ground had not been broken. In cold, dry springs and winters, I have found the early ploughing to do much the best, but from observation I find that we have only about one of them in ten years. If I lived in a cold climate, I would recommend to break early and deep, where the ground freezes from seven to twelve inches or over, where the rains are not so heavy, and a large portion of the time the land is covered with snow. In all climates above 36 degrees, I would give it as my opinion, that land would be ma- terially benefited by fall ploughing, and the further north you go on that line, the more benefit would be re- ceived from fall ploughing. The freezes and snows would make up for all the disadvantages that apply to the line south of 33 degrees. I do not consider it a question when to be- gin breaking land; the point is, you must begin in time to do the work be- fore planting, and take all the advan- tages and disadvantages that may- come; and the better the breaking is done, the easier the land is cultivated, and the larger the crops. I always consider the preparation the half, ^and the heaviest half, of viaking the crop. No step in the whole process of ag- riculture can be considered so abso- lutely essential to successful crop- growing as proper and thorough prep- aration of the soil before planting. We need to turn in the surface soil with the vegetable matter. We want a large extent of soil and depth of pulverization, because the roots of plants are many times longer than the limbs and stalks, sometimes go- ing as many as five or six times the length of the limbs and stalks of corn and cotton. We want a well pulverized soil of sufficient depth to take in from the spring rains a supply of water sufficient to move .off the young crops in the spring and carry them safely through eight or ten weeks of drought. To this end, you 36 DICKSON'S SYSTEM OF FARMING. must have a soil of twelve inches and subsoil six inches beyond. Now as to the method of procedure: Have good turning plows, and, ac- cording to your ability, use one or two horses, and subsoil behind. Ride over the field or plat, and lay off the land so that the teams will go round on a level, and the dirt fall down hill. A team will break the soil nine inches deep in this way as easily as they could seven inches on a level piece of land. Continue this round until the field is finished — one team following another — all the time go- ing round the circle. If you subsoil have one team between each turning plow — running in the bottom of the furrow. Finish in the middle of the field or cut. In this way no water furrows are left to be washed out into gullies, and the general surface of the field is left uniformly smooth. If you wish a fort to stand a hot and protracted attack, you must wa- ter and provision, as well as man it, in order that it may hold out until the siege is raised — remembering one day unprovided for may prove fatal; so if you wish a cotton plant or a corn stalk to stand a hot burning sun, and a dry northwest wind, from four to ten weeks, and come out safely, you must water and put in sufficient solu- ble food to last. How is that to be done? By deepening the soil, plough- ing deep, subsoiling, and filling it* with humus, that it may retain the greatest amount of water. The soil is like a sponge, if too porous, water will sink through it; if too close, it will hold but little. I find that humus, clay, and a due proportion of sand, constitutes the best soil, to succeed under all circumstances, with soluble plant food in abundance. An over estimate as to the practi- cal importance of deep and thorough breaking of lands for the cultivated crops can not be made. It is an ab- solute necessity, one of the indispens- ables in all necessary farming. A grain of corn, or seed of cotton in- serted into a soil of half an inch of depth Vill readily germinate and sprout up under the inspiration of vegetable instinct; but for want of depth of soil, these plants soon wilt. and perish away fruitless. To pro- duce prolific crops, or even to repro- duce their kind, they must have, not only fertile, but deep soil. Hence, we emphasize what we know from long practice and hard-earned experience. Plow deep; turn your land under from eight to twelve inches, submerg- ing the surface soil, with all the litter and vegetable matter deep under. Plow deep, for the purpose of well arid thoroughly pulverizing the soil and making it loose, permeable and tillable. Plow deep, and subsoil, to give your crop roots depth of range, and capacity of reservoir that will se- cure them sufficiency of moisture for any emergency of drought. Deepen your subsoiling to that extent that will furnish safety in any possible or probable peradventure, up to a ten weeks' drought, (see article on the "Cultivation of Cotton" on that point). The reader will permit me to recur to a point of importance connected with the subject of turning lands, which was omitted in it proper place. I allude to the popular impression, en- tertained by many, that it will not do to turn the clay subsoil to the surface, for the reason it will injure the land, and prevents the crops from growing off promptly. Now this is all myth; one inch of clay, each year, over a good soil, will do no harm in any land. The clay turned to the surface will, by op* eration of the chemical elements of the atmosphere, become vitalized, and so changed chemically as to assume the properties of the fertile soil. Many a red-clay fortification in Geor- gia, during the late war, has demon- strated this fact, by producing on the very height of the embankment the most luxuriant weeds. Hence the ex- posure of the clay to the atmosphere transforms it into a fertile soil, and thus, to that extent, deepens the soil, and at the same time shields the ten- der roots of the planted crops from the hot suns of early summer, and un- til the cultivator comes along to break the crust, and let in the air, light and heat. So, turning a stratum of sub- soil clay to the surface not only does not injure the land, but contributes to deepening the soil by vitalizing its organic elements, and making them productive. BREAKING LANDS. 37 1 take the ground that if my sys- tem be carried out as a whole, there is no use to break the ground but once a year. It requires till the first of May to do it right, and that is soon enough to finish. Then the sweep in- stead of the bull tongue for cultiva- tion. If you depend upon the latter you will loose two-thirds of your crop. An important precaution in break- ing lands is, never plow when the land is wet. Let it sufficiently dry af- •ter each rain to crumble and disinte- grate when raised by the plow. The soil should never be plowed when it is so wet as for the particles to ad- here or stick together in lumps. When thus plowed wet, the soil dries off hard and crusty, and to a certain ex- tent, loses its assimilable character, and hence, to that extent. Injured; clay soils are greatly damaged by be- ing plowed when wet. It must al- ways be remembered that the princi- pal object in breaking lands is pul- verization. There is no necessity for breaking lands a second time during the sea- son., or for the same crop, if it has been well done, and sufficient carbon and vegetable mold incorporated into the soil. Lands that have thus been prepared by breaking, and planted in crops, become the domain, the pri- vate territory, of these crops, and should not again be invaded by the plowshare, but left to tender culture of the surface cultivator. Good Pasture Lands. CHAPTER VI. Cultivation of Crops. The main objects of cultivating crops are, to Iteep the weeds and grass out from drawing the substance from the plants, and to keep the sur- face broke so as to let in light, heat and air. If a small amount of loose earth is on top, it prevents the sur- face from heating too rapidly below, and acts as a blanket to keep the earth from discharging the heat too rapidly at night. This small fine pul- verization on top, say from a half to an inch, comes to the dew point much earlier than a solid body, and secretes moisture and the elements of the at- mosphere much earlier in the night and more rapidly. It retains the ele- ments of the atmosphere to be wash- ed deeper down when it rains, and protects any further evaporation be- low the moisture until that is dis- charged. I consider it just as deleterious to, cut the roots of a plant as I would to cut the veins of an ox when 1 have him fattening. The object of the roots is to penetrate in every direc- tion the surface and the depth below, .to gather the food and send it up to the blades to be elaborated by them into food for the stalks and the grain. If the roots are cut off, the whole sup- ply of nutriment is cut off; if enough roots are left in deep ploughing to prevent the plant from dying straight out it may be recuperated for awhile, but it would have the same effect as putting an ox on half feed when he is fattening. Vegetable mould opens the parti- cles of clay, and so mellows the soil that the roots of the plant may easi- ly penetrate; and it is so closes the particles of sand as to enable the soil to retain moisture. Hence there is no positive necessity of breaking such land a second time during the same crop-season. To break the surface crust occasionally, to destroy the grass and weeds, and admit the at- mospheric gases, light and heat, is the object of crop culture. Hence, my practice of surface culture. The practice of root cutting is so absurd, and so violate of the evi- dent design of nature, that I have in all my farming, avoided the use of plows that cut deep enough to reach the roots of plants that I am cultiva- ting. These roots are put forth in ac- cordance with the laws of vegetable life, to collect and appropriate nutri- ment to the growing crops. These roots and fibrils permeate the soil in every direction, an'd to the utmost depths of the broken soil, and travers- ing entirely across the rows, instinc- tively seek the richer spots of soil. To cut these roots is simply doing vio- lence to nature's laws and seriously frustrating her designs. In my practice of surface-culture, I use a broad, shallow-cutting sweep, that simply breaks the crust, and run- ning not deeper than from half an inch to one inch. The following is a description of, and directions for mak- ing and using, this cultivator: CUL'nVATION OF CROPS. 39 The Dickson Sxi-eep. The stem should be of iron, three- inches wide and three-fourths of an inch thick. It should be cut square off of a bar, fourteen or fifteen and a half-inches long, 'leaving five and a half inches stem above the wing to come on the foot of the plough. The balance of the stem is to put the wing on, and to form the point. The use of the point is, that you can hold the sweep much more steadily, and it acts as a rudder to keep every little bunch of grass or twig from throwing it out of its position. I find the most valua- ble size to be from twenty-two to twenty-six inches, never less or more. The wings should be cut out of the best Swedes iron, just half the length of the width of the sweep. TTie width of the iron in the wings should be three and a half inches by one-half inch, and they should be cut diagon- ally across the iron, varying about one inch from the true line, and when the wings are put on, the end of the wings should lack very little of be- ing in a straight line with the upper end of the stem. If put square on, they would not discharge the dirt, on account of too great a slope, and they would dodge for every little resist- ance, instead of cutting it. The sweep should be put on the stock so that when power is applied on the end of the beam it would not be in- clined to go in or come out of the ground. They should always be kept sharp, if the smith has to work on them once a day. They will usually last from three to ten days without sharpening. In contra-distinction to this strict- ly surface-culture, the popular prac- tice of deep plowing with rooters or turn-plows — thus rebreaking the land at every plowing of the crop, is prac- tically absurd, and acts as a stunning blow to every crop thus treated. Whilst, in the preparation of the land for planting, the plowing should be — in all — eighteen inches, the culti- vation should not be deeper than above stated; but the farmer who pre- pares his land by breaking it eighteen inches deep, and cultivates six inches, deep, will injure his crops less than the farmer who prepares six inches deep and cultivates six inches deep. In the one case — the roots having twelve inches of prepared land to oc- cupy, and in the other, no space at all not interrupted by the root-cutter. Nature is exact, and puts forth no superfluous roots to growing plants! Hence every root should be spared. It is astonishing how quickly and rapidly the roots of a young plant will spring out, and traverse a mellow soil, and how speedily the tap-root will reach the hard subsoil beneath, and end its quest in that direction. Hence every plowing in cultivation that is deeper than one inch must destroy more or less of the plant roots; but under my system of preparing, plant- ing and cultivating, as a general re- mark, I cut no roots. Soils planted in crops, belong to these crops, and the cultivator has no right to invade it with his plowshare during the growth and development of these crops. To best promote the processes of nature in maturing these crops, he has only to break the surface crust occasionally to destroy extraneous growths and admit the light and at- mospheric gases to the under soil. This is sufl^ciently effected by the sur- face culture proposed, and by the Dickson Sweep above described. The true philosophy of crop cultivation re- quires nothing more. To violate this principal and practice is to dam- age the crops. Furthermore, it is great economy of time and labor to sweep your crops with a twenty-two inch sweep instead of breaking again, and everv three weeks with a bull-tongue three or four inches wide. CuJtivation with such an implement, makes dividends impossible. There is no use for the second breaking with bull-tongue or rooters to make the most out of land or labor. The sweep will give you larger dividends because you can cultivate a much larger area, and do it upon more conservative principles. It is not only important that the plowing of crops should be done shal- low, so that the roots of the plants may escape cutting, but the same care and tenderness should be observed in the hoeing of crops. The term "chop- ping cotton" should be expunged from -the farmer's vocabulary. Cot- 40 DICKSON'S SYSTEM OF FARMING. ton should be thinned by shaving out across the drill — and not dug out by 'chopping.' Let the hoe pass level through the drill, and just deep enough to shave off the cotton and grass, barely breaking the surface crust, and finish the thinning with the hand, if necessary. The ridge or bed should not ^e rudely chopped down leaving the tender roots of the cotton bare, or in a crippled or fall- ing condition. To break up its at- tachments to the soil, leave it in a tottering condition, or cut off its tap- roots just under the crust soil, is posi- tively hurtful to the plants. It crip- ples and stunts them, and they often perish. I repeat, shave lightly and do not dig about your plants. The same is true of other crops. Digging about corn, to hill it, is of- ten hurtful. Deep ploughing, or dig- ging about, forking or spading crops in the cultivation, is all wrong. Proper Cultivation. CHAPTER VII. Cultivation of Corn. Preparation of the Land. If you cover deep you lose all the advantages of deep planting (but not deep breaking) ; and for this reason — corn, in good weather, will come up from a depth of one to six inches, but will strike out roots about one inch from the surface of the ground, *and all below that will perish. That is one reason why I am opposed to dirt- ing corn as it comes up. It brings the roots of the stalk to the top of the ground. " If any hills should be missing, it should be immediately replanted as soon as the corn comes up, and it will be just as forward as the other corn. If more than one grain be dropped, just as soon as the stalks have three blades they should be thinned to one — never having more than one stalk in a hill. Cultivation. It is not necessary to commence working corn before the 20th of April to the 1st of May. One reason for this is that earlier working is a loss of time, and if the corn plant is hilled up before there are lateral roots to it, the plant roots all below an inch or inch and a half will perish, thereby losing all the advantages of putting the corn in deep, but no loss from the deep preparation. My plan is to fin- ish working from the ^Oth of April to the 25th of May. With the land well turned very little grass and weeds will come up, except in the bottom of the furrow, which will be easily man- aged. First Working. — I would side with a twenty-two inch sweep, the back of the right wing elevated about one inch and a quarter, so as to sift in dirt to make it about an inch of being on a level with the common surface. The middle can be broken with the same size sweep, the back of both wings elevated, finishing out the seven feet with four furrows. A horse should plough three and a half acres a day, and four hands completing fourteen acres every day, by going sixteen miles a day. Second Ploughing. — This work, if well done, will stand from three to four weeks. It should be ploughed just as at first, with the right wing of the sweep a little more elevated, run- ning very close to the corn — leaving a perfectly level surface, and finish- ing out the middle with three furrows. Add a fifth furrow for making a good place for planting peas. Five horses should plough fourteen acres a day. If the plowing be well done there is no use for a hoe. Planting Peas. From the 1st to the 20th of June is the time to plant peas. This should be between the second and third ploughing — running a shovel furrow in the middle of the corn rows. One hand can drop for one plough. Drop six or seven peas a distance of not over two feet — covering with a har- row. Two hands and one dropper 42 DICKSON'S SYSTEM OF FARMING. will plant sixteen acres per day. If the farmer can. spare the time and means it will pay to guano his peas. Third Ploughing. — This is to be the last and final ploughing. It should not exceed half an inch in depth. Side the corn with a twenty-two inch sweep, the right wing elevated, and the left wing one-half elevated. Side the peas with a twenty-six inch sweep, the right wing half elevated, the left wing elevated, going a half-inch deep. If this be well done, it leaves a beau- tiful inch of surface — not a bunch of grass in the pea or corn row. No hoe hands are ever needed in the cultiva- tion if the plough hand does his duty. Should the hand who sides the corn leave a bunch of grass, he should get it with his hand or foot. This will make him more careful to do the work right; and he can go his sixteen and two-thirds miles a day, take care of his horse, and do everything that is necessary to be done. This is the last ploughing; if well done, the ground will be almost as smooth and level as a floor, with not a sprig of grass to the two hundred acres, nor a weed to be seen in the field. In old times, I required every hand to clean the crop as he went — what the plough left, to be removed with the foot and hand. From thir- teen to sixteen miles, according to the condition of the crop, was a day's work. Such pine land as mine (some of it very poor) should make from twen- ty to twenty -five bushels per acre; and wet or dry, if the work is right- ly done, there is no such thing as a failure. All the labor required to cultivate corn is less than one day per acre; requiring only thirteen days to culti- vate fourteen acres; and if well done, it will get the largest crop out of the land that is possible to get any one year. To plant the pea crop costs only one-eighth of a day per acre in the ploughing, and one-sixteenth of a day's work per acre to drop it. This will make the corn and pea crop, af- ter the land has been prepared, re- quire only one day's work per acre. The reader will note in the above account of my plan of corn culture — a practical solution of the proposi- tion — "do not cut the roots of growing crops." In the first ploughing, the sweep did not reach within several inches of the surface roots of the corn. Hence, not a root . was touched. In the second ploughing, the sweep is to run not exceeding one inch deep. This one inch will not reach even the surface around the corn, and its roots being below, can not be reached by a plough running one inch deep — so, the roots have escaped the two first ploughings. The third and last ploughing goes only half an inch deep, and hence misses the plant roots again, and not a root has been cut during the entire cultivation of the crop. Clay lands will bear the same treat- ment as sandy lands, with the same result, and with less difficulty. If you have two hogs fattening, one white, representing sandy land, the other red, representing red land, and you cut .the veins and let out the blood every two or three weeks, the resul*" would be the same — just so cutting the roots of corn every two or three weeks, on red or sandy land, would involve the same loss. I do not care what color your land is, or whether sand or clay, if you keep up a full sup- ply of vegetable mold, break deep be- fore planting, and cultivate lightly afterwards, the same results will be good, wet or dry. This method of deep planting and shallow covering forces the plants to take root deeply- — at the bottom of the mellow soil, which retains mois- ture for a long time without addition- al rains; and, hence, I say tliat I can make an average crop of corn with one or two rains after it comes up. The ample distance I give corn, like- wise helps to economize the water supply and keep the crops green and growing during drought. The most palpable sources of fail- • ure in the production of the corn crop are four-fold: 1st. Not keeping a sufficient quan- tity of vegetable mold in the land. 2d. Ploughing too shallow in pre- paring for the crop. 3d. Planting too thick. 4th. Cultivating too deep. CULTIVATION OF CORN. 43 "With slave labor before the war, my last crop was as follows: On one thousand acres of thin pine land, eighteen bushels of corn per acre was the lowest average. The highest average I ever made on this land was twenty-six bushels and one peck per acre. The lowest acre produced twelve bushels, and the highest thir- ty-eight bushels on upland, with two thousand stalks per acre. It was easy to find ears of corn that weighed twenty ounces. Pulling Blades. There is great diversity of opinion as to the pulling of fodder. I have foimd by practice, that if the "Com- pound" is used, especially salt and plaster, the corn will be fully ma- tured before the fodder begins to damage, and it will be much heavier than if it w'as not used, and there will be no loss of corn whatever from pull- ing the blades. There is no food that stock like better than well-matured fodder, nicely cured. Those who have a different opinion, and have made a test of the corn, have always pulled the fodder too soon. The ob- ject is, first, to cultivate corn for the sake of the corn; and when the corn has made all it can make, there can be no objection to saving the fodder. With deep preparation, liberal ma- nuring, and the ground kept clean by shaving off the grass with the sweep, the corn will be made and hard, while the fodder is still green and good. Then the fodder may be pulled off without hurting the corn in the least. Fodder may be kept green on the stalk two or three weeks after the corn is hard, by using salt and plaster around the hill as a manure. There is no better food for stock than fodder well saved. Preserving Corn. Having been often called upon to answer the question, how to preserve corn, and not having had time to an- swer such letters, I will give my prac- tice. No other corn can be kept long but sound, pure corn. Use the yel- low flint variety for long keeping. That corn you wish to keep the long- est, let it thoroughly cure in the field, pull it when^it is thoroughly dry, from the middle *of November to the middle of December, put into a dark house, fill it full. This corn will stay till you use it. I should have men- tioned that I always put it up in shuck, put it in as close as possible; and if a rat-proof house is used, so much the better. Time for Planting. In deciding this question, you must be governed by the season and the weather. From the 10th of March to the 1st of April, corn planting may be commenced. A mild and favorable winter, with flattering indications of opening spring, will invite you to com- mence your planting as early as the 10th of March. But should the spring be a little late, the ground still cold, and the weather unfavorable, you may safely and with better policy, defer planting till the middle, 20th, or even to the last of March. These in- structions apply to sections on or near the .33d degree north latitude. Of «ourse, further south corn can be planted earlier; and further north much later. According to my expe- rience, the farmer only gains hard work and more of it, by very early planling. In the Southern and Middle States, the corn-growing season is abundantly long to allow the planter to select his planting time. Corn is an annual, and under proper system of culture makes and matures its crop speedily. Planted while the ground is still cold, it does not spring up and grow off promptly; but the plant, loitering for want of warm sun and soil, becomes puny and more or less stunted in its growth, and can never make such a luxuriant crop as when it gi'ows oft promptly. There is no sense in plant- ing a summer crop in the winter. As a single crop, to make the heaviest yield, I would plant in April, but only advise the earlier planting to con- form its culture to the combined schedule of corn and cotton together. The best crop I ever made was plan- ted about the first of May. Distance. The first thing is to settle the capac- ity of your land to produce corn, as to the number of bushels in an ordinary year, and never exceed one hundred 44 DICKSON'S SYSTEM OF FARMING. and thirty-three stalks to the bushel. Seventy-five stalks can be made to yield a bushel, and I have made a bushel off of fifty stalks the field over. Taking land that will make from ten to thirty bushels of corn to the acre, I would have rows seven feet apart, and drop the grains three feet dis- tant in the distance given above, there will be twenty-one square feet for each stalk of corn. If there should be enough soluble matter in that space for two or even three ears, one stalk will take it up; but if there is only matter enough for one ear of corn, and you put two stalks, and water is scarce at earing time, you will miss gathering — even that one ear. Again, if it be a dry year, thin planting will always beat; and corn always commands a better price such years. The higher the latitude where corn will ripen before frost the thicker it may be planted, and the more it will make per acre — other things being equal. But I contend that two thou- sand stalks are enough for one acre in the latitude of Middle Georgia. Under no circumstances would I advise more than one hundred and thirty-three stalks to the bushel of corn the land ought to make per acre. I have made one bushel of corn for every fifty-two stalks in the field. In planting richer lands, that would bear say three thousand stalks or more per acre, I would lay the rows six feet one way and regulate the distance in the drill, so as to give the number of stalks de- sired. The most universal, fatal error in raising corn is, planting it too thick! Give it distance, and seek to make ear not stalk — grain instead of fodder. Planting. Lay off your rows with a long shovel plow, on a level, seven feet apart. Commence at the opposite end with a longer shovel, and open out the same furrow. The reason for running this second furrow in the op- posite direction is, you get up to the trees and stumps, and make a better finish at the end. Whether you use compost, cotton- seed, guano or my compound, let each hand have a three-foot measure, and by it deposit the manure in the bottom of the furrow just three feet apart. Then drop the corn within three or four inches from the manure — one or more grains in the hill — dropping on the near side of the ma- nure as the dropper goes. With a very light harrow, cover the corn one or one and a half-inches deep. The harrow should go the same way the dropper goes to keep from pulling the manure on the grain, and thus de- stroying its germinating powers. The corn is now in the ground eight inches deep, and covered from one to one and a half inches. It will germi- nate and quickly come up, and send out not only its tap-root to the depth of broken soil, but lateral roots in every direction seven inches below the common surface. Peanut, Natural Size — A Fine Crop for Hogs. CHAPTER VIII. Cultivation of Cotton. Distance of rows. — As, in my plan of preparing land for corn and lay- ing off the rows, the question of dis- tance occurs. My early impressions, dictated by reason and knowledge of the natural history of the cotton plant, its nature, habits, etc., decided me to give the crop good distance in the row, to allow room for proper culti- vation, and free access of air and sun- light to this sun-plant. I prefer to have my rows wide apart, and leave the plants thick in the drill, for this reason: All land has its capacity, with or without ma- nure, but greater in proportion to ma- nuring and deep preparation, to sus- tain a certain number of plants. The cotton plants, when still small, com- mence to take on and mature bolls, and continue until they exhaust the soluble matter, or reach the full ca- pacity of the land. Two stalks will do that much sooner than one, and will so avoid late droughts, caterpil- lar, boll-worm and early frosts. For all good medium and thin grades of lands I find that four feet is near enough to have the rows; richer lands require more distance. In very rich land the distance be- tween the rows may be from four to six feet; probably some of the Mis- sissippi bottoms may want eight feet. No land is so poor that the rows of cotton should be nearer than four feet. If you have not land enough to plant as much as you wish, purchase more. A four foot row will make more than a three foot row; it is just as easy cultivated, if the season is favorable, and more easy if they are not. Preparation. — With large shovel plough lay off your rows four feet apart, running them as near on a level as possible. Run a second furrow with same size but longer shovel, in the bottom of the same row, opening it well out and to the depth of seven or eight inches. In this furrow de- posit the fertilizer intended to be used, with the hand or fertilizer sower, at the rate of from four hun- dred to a thousand pounds per acre. With a long scooter plough, run deeply on each side of this row, cover- ing the manure and leaving a imall, sharp ridge in the center. Run the same plough deeply in these furrows a second time, or, a good subsoil plough, if preferred. Now. with a good turnplough. run on the sid(> of each of these scooter furrows, and scooter furrows in each of these turn-plough furrows. Split out the remaining middle with a large shovel as deep as the team will pull it. That finishes the bed. Continue this process the field over; nine furrows finishing each row. It will leave a broad, flat bed, just over the middle of which the seed are to be planted. I will now give you a plan that will carry the cotton plant through eight or ten weeks of drought with safety, and enable it to get ahead of the cat- erpillar — the boll-worm may come too soon for a full crop — but one need 46 DICKSON'S SYSTEM OF FARMING. not fear the caterpillar, if they do not come before the first of September. Always remember the soil must be good and deep and subsoiled six inches deeper, and furnished with a good sup- ply of guano, dissolved bones, plaster and salt. A cotton plant to stand two weeks must have four inches of soil and six inches subsoil; three weeks, six inches soil, same sub- soiling; four weeks, eight inches, same subsoiling; and for every week of dry weather, you will need an ad- ditional inch, with the same six inches subsoil, broken below. So, you will see, to stand a ten weeks' drouth you must have a soil sixteen inches 'deep, with six inches broken below. This plan will hold the forms and bolls during the whole time, and not give them up when it rains; but should you not prepare right, and your supplies give out, or surrender one week before reinforcements come, in form of water, much is lost, and it may be too late to start anew. If you prepare and carry out this plan well, you may expect from four hundred to twelve hundred pounds of lint cotton per acre, according to the character of the laud, locality, etc. Time for Planting. — From the 10th to the 25th of April, I consider the best time for planting cotton in this latitude. But, in round numbers, any time from the first of April to the 15th of May will do to plant cotton. You may plant with high manuring as late even as the first of June. By ex- tending your planting over the long- est periods, you can raise the larg- est crops, the bulk being put in about the 15th or 20th of April. The earlier cotton is planted the lighter it must be covered. Planting. — When the proper time arrives, and the land is ready, open with a short bull-tongue, sow the seed with hand, and cover with a light har- row. But a cotton planter is prefera- ble. When this is used it finishes the whole operation at once — opening, dropping and covering the seed. First Working. — In the first working of the cotton, side with a twenty-two- inch sweep — with the right wing tol- erably flat, going very close to the plant, and not exceeding a half inch in depth in the plowing. Let the sweep be sharp. In ten days, commence hoeing witli a sharp. No. 2 Scovill hoe, scraping through the drill very lightly, and leaving from two to three stalks in the hill, the width of the hoe. I pre- fer two stalks in a hill. Leave no grass to bunch and cause a future bad stand. In many instances, it is best, when half over the first time, to turn back and clean what has been hoed. The shaving of the grass with the hoe will act as a second working of the crop. It will always be safe, if you can, to return to the cotton once in three weeks. Do not chop out cotton but shave it out with the hoe. You must not dig down about its roots, but scrape it off, not tearing up the soil around it and exposing its roots to the sun. Second Working. — At the end of about three weeks, side your cotton again with the same twenty-two-inch sweep, the right wing a little up, run- ning close to the row, and shallow. Cotton ought to be ploughed about every three weeks. If the work be well done, it will, in most cases, stand four weeks. By this plan the cotton will be kept clean, and get the advan- tage of frequent stirring, which should be surface stirring. Continue plough- ing till the 15th to 20th of August, nor more than one-eighth to one-quarter inch deep, and in the same manner, and with the same sweep as for first and second ploughing. Once or twice during the season run out the middle with one furrow to keep the land level. Cotton may be made with two to three ploughings. Four sidings and two middle splittings are all that it ever wants under the most favorable circumstances. The greatest amount of work the cotton requires is only ten furrows to the row for all culti- vation. The whole ploughing occu- pies just one and a fourth day's work per acre, under favorable circum- stances; and it may be completed with three-fourth day's work per acre. It is essential that each of those ploughings should be done very shal- low and close, never stopping for dry weather. If the ground stays wet, CULTIVATION OF COTTON. 47 you may stop a few hours and hoe. The hoeing and ploughi-ag during the cultivation of the crop closes up the land sufficiently to cause the fruit to set finely. At the beginning of the planting it was sufficiently porous for the roots to penetrate in every direc- tion, and to any desired depth. The cotton plant is like the cultivated plum or cherry, requiring the land to be pretty close around the roots to set its fruit well, and prevent its drowning in excessive rains. To cause early maturity the rows of the cotton should be one way four feet apart, and there should be from two to three stalks in a hill, at the dis- tance of every nine inches. When the cotton fruit commences to bloom, each stalk will bloom and take on just as many bolls as if there were only three stalks to the yard. This system, stated above, will insure eight stalks to the yard, if hoed with care, which is one hundred and sixty- six per cent, more stalks than if one stalk is left for every twelve inches. By placing the stalks thick in the drill, and wide apart, the land is less shaded, and gets more light and sun. If you wish to shade with a given number of plants, the more equally the land is divided the more com- pletely it is shaded. Prepared, manured, planted and cultivated, as directed, there never J has been any reason, any year, to pre- vent you from having a good average crop. The driest year I have ever known has satisfied me of this fact. If you pursue the above plan, and get three favorable weeks from the 20th of July, you will get a good average crop. Thin planting, as a general thing, latens the crop. If seasons have been regular, and the above di- rections have been carried out, the plant will be completely checked by the 20th of August, and need no top- ping. Topping is advantageous where we find the bolls have not come on soon enough, and, if topped, should be done from the 5th to the 10th of August. The heavier the cotton bolls the more care is necessary, by previous preparation and manuring, to sustain the plant. Care should also be taken not to skin or bruise the shanks of the cotton with the hoe. The hoe should never be raised more than eight inches from the ground to hoe cotton. The hoe should be kept sharp, and grass should be cut just below the crown. Scratch out the word chop, and use the word hoe or scrape. This matures cotton earlier, and renders it less likely to be dam- aged by boll-worms and caterpillars, Rust in Cotton. Rust is simply poverty' of the land. This poverty is produced from vari- ous causes, such as wet lands that leach, lands that are too porous to hold water, that receive too much rain at one time and get too dry at another, and letting it get grassy so as to rob the plant of what little nourishment that is there. The hilly, sandy land can be improved by mix- ing with them a vegetable mold, and using a sufficient quantity of "Dick- son's Compound" with surface cul- ture. The wet lands have to be drained to increase their fertility. Red and post-oak lands that are suf- ficiently dry need nothing but enrich- ing; and the true system for every- body is, to make the land as near vir- gin soil as possible. I have never known in this section new lands to rust. The black prairie lands I am not acquainted with, but I understand they are liable to rust; but I believe the same system of keeping them full of vegetable mold up to the virgin standard, and the use of the "Com- pound" manure, would succeed in making cotton in them. The sul- phuric acid that is in the plaster might to some extent supply the place of carbonic acid that is deficient by long cultivation. The above is true in my practice. As to the black prai- rie land, it is a mere suggestion, but I believe that it will succeed. Picking Cotton. Picking should commence as early as the cotton commences opening, and the cotton should always be sun- ned when picked before the seed ma- tures or hardens. If the crop ap- pears to be large, it will have to be picked by the hands. Hurry them up; admit a little trash to increase the quantity picked. The falling off 48 DICKSON'S SYSTEM OF FARMING. in price by picking a little trash, is not so disastrous as to let the cotton stay and waste, and turn black for the sake of picking it clean. No system can prosper without teaching all the operatives and labor- ers to be experts, whether agricultu- ral, or manufacturing, or anything that is done requiring labor. The first thing to do, in regard to any of the operations of labor, is to teach the laborers how to do it; the next thing, to do it with more ease' and efficiency, and to learn to do better and better work every day. For instance, take a boll of cotton. They must be taught, with the greatest speed, how to throw the hand into the boll, and to pull out all of the cotton with one lick, not waiting to see whether any was left in the boll or not, always having in mind to strike but one lick at a boll, and as soon as that is done to strike at another boll. I have, in five minutes, learned a hand to pick one hundred pounds more of cotton per day than he had picked on the previous day, and from that point he will continue to improve. The greatest efficiency I have obtained in hands picking cot- ton was seven hundred pounds — equal to three good bales a week. Selection of Cotton Seed. To raise cotton for seed, the best boiling plants should be selected that is on the plantation. Manure it well, and cultivate as directed above. Plant in it the most select seed on hand, and in working the cotton you should always pull up the stalks that prove unprolific, even if it makes a vacuum. When matured, from the second and third pickings, select the best stalks, those that have limbs sufficiently well to contain from six to seven bolls from a half inch to an inch apart. The best known variety to commence with is the "Dickson's Select." this variety having outlived every other in productiveness and popularity. The cotton for seed should be picked when dry, and put up when dry. This will always insure a healthy plant. If the seed is partially damaged, the plant will continue to die out for weeks after it comes up. and sometimes fail even to make its appearance after sprouting. I would select cotton for seed every year. Select enough every year to plant to make seed to plant the entire crop the succeeding year. There is a belt of land running through Georgia and other Cotton States, that I consider the home of the cotton plant — possibly the bottoms in the West may be better adapted to it. The southern line commences in Geor- gia above Augusta, and ends just above Columbus, embracing the Southern granitic region — mulatto, pine, and oak and hickory lands, and extending about one degree north. I prefer the southern part of this belt. The north end of my farm in included in this southern part.. Planters living south of this line, would do well to obtain seed from this region once in three or four years. South of this belt, the cot- ton plant is inclined to produce too much weed and too little fruit. In it, with proper preparation, rotation, ma- nure and rest, you can make the cotton plant just what you please, as gentle- men from all parts of Georgia can testify, who have seen my crop — mak- ing two bales per acre on cotton from twenty-six to twenty-eight inches high. To improve the cotton plant, you should select seed every year, imme- diately after the first picking, up to the middle of October, selecting (in the case of Dickson seed) from stalks that send out one or more suckers near the ground, sometimes called arms. These arms need not be looked for on poor land. Secondly, from those that send out limbs thick with three to six bolls, from a half-inch to one and a half-inch apart on the limbs. If you do not keep your land well charged with humus, the cotton limbs will be too short; if you cut the cotton roots, you will make stalks instead of bolls. On all farms there are some acres that produce cotton better than others. Seed for plant- ing should always be selected from these spots. Thinking it best to tell what I have CULTIVAxfON OF COTTON. 49 done, instead of giving advice that I do not follow, I will give you tiie de- tails of the preparation, manuring, planting, cultivation and production of a sixteen-acre lot, planted in cot- ton; and as many may desire to know all the particulars, I will be explicit as I can be in a letter. First, the land is good pine land, and has been under the plough nearly seventy years, and as many as fifty- five years in cotton. About twelve years ago, it was sown in oats, with two hundred pounds of guano and bones mixed with salt and plaster, and made thirty or thirty-five bushels per acre — all fed off my turning stock in the field. Four years ago, I left it uncultivated until the middle of July; there was then a heavy growth of weeds on it, just grown. I turned them in, and dropped peas in every third furrow. The result was a large crop of vines, and at least fifteen bushels of peas per acre. These were fed off by beef cattle. That, if you call it rest, is all the field ever had. The lot lies between two branches, running north and south; on one slope, next to the branch, is a second growth of pines; the other is a peach orchard. The cotton was planted on the top of a level ridge, lying within one-fourth to one-half of a mile of Little Ogee- chee. It was planted in cotton in 1866 — manured with about one hun- dred and fifty pounds of bones and Peruvian guano each, and one hun- dred pounds of plaster. I commenced third day of May, with two horses, to prepare the land; cotton rows four feet apart; ran two furrows in the middle of each row, which stood open about eight-inches deep, an'd applied to each acre two hundred and fifty pounds soluble bones, one hundred and sixty-five pounds No. 1 Peruvian guano, and one hundred pounds of plaster. Salt being too high, I omitted that. The mixture was deposited in the bottom of the furrow; then covered with a long scooter plough. going about as deep as the other two furrows; then covered with a long scooter plough, going about as deep on the side of each scooter furrow, with a good turning-plough, going seven inches deep. After preparing about six acres in this way, I opened with a small buU-tongued plough;, dropped the seed and covered lightly with a board, part of it with a har- row. I continued in this way until the lot was planted, finishing the 15th of May. The land being freshly pre- pared, and a little dry, it did not come up well. The 25th of May, had a fine shower, and on the first morning of June I turned the ploughs back to finish the preparation, running a scooter, twelve inches long, in the bot- tom of each turn-plough furrow, going seven inches deeper; then ploughed up the old stalks with a large, long shovel plough, going under the old cotton stalks — making nine furrows to the row in preparing the land, tak- ing nine days, with one horse, for every eight acres, which was equal to a full subsoiling. You observe that the preparation was not expen- sive. Including planting, it was eleven days" work to eight acres. The cotton soon stretched up well. The first ploughing was done with a heavy twenty-two inch sweep (right wing towards the end nearly flat, the back edge of the wing about one and a fourth of an inch above the front edge in elevation). I then hoed out to a stand, the width of a No. 2 Sco- ville hoe, leaving one to three stalks in a hill. Cotton standing thick in the drill will be more forward than that which is thin. Give it the neces- sary distance between the rows. The second ploughing was done with the same kind of sweep, with both wings elevated. The second and last hoeing followed in a few days. The third ploughing ran one furrow in the middle of the rows. The cultivation with the plough occu- pied one horse five days for each eight acres, which makes two days ploughing for each acre, and about two days hoeing for the same. 50 DICKSON'S SYSTEk OF FARMING. The cotton grew so rapidly, it did not need any more work. I hired the picking of most of it, at forty cents per hundred pounds. The lot aver- aged about three thousand (3,000) pounds per acre, but owing to a storm and other causes, I gathered only twenty-seven hundred (2,700) pounds and a fraction, which will make two good bales to the acre. I picked out one hundred bolls in two separate parts of the lot, at four o'clock in the evening of a dry day. Each weighed twenty-one ounces. In the lot was an Irish potato patch that had been manured and mulched with straw twice. I think that portion made at the rate of six thousand pounds per acre. The next best place was about one acre of old pine field, first year, which made, I think, about five thousand pounds. If you expect such results, you must not cut the roots of the cotton. Cot- ton is a sun-plant, as you will see by it turning its leaves to the sun, as the latter moves through the heavens. So have a deep water furrow in the spring, work flat by hot weather, and on level land run the rows north and south. The cotton would have been much bettor, planted the 10th of April. The seasons were as fine as they could be up to the 28th of July. After that, too much rain. The hands I had were all new, and very sorry; the manure was badly mixed and badly put on. I found during the wet weather, where the most manure was put, it stood the test best — especially the part that had the most Peruvian gu- ano on it. There was some rot, ow- ing to the density of foliage and wet weather; some boll-worm and cater- pillar on about one-half of the patch. The result of this experiment on sixteen acres of land, manured with 250 pounds soluble bones, 165 pounds Peruvian guano, and 100 pounds land plaster, per acre, was as follows : It made 32 bales of cotton, the last one being a bale and a half. The crop selling for $125.00 per bale brought $4,000, a net dividend of one thou- sand dollars and more per acre. The following is an itemized statement of actual expenses and calculation as to net proceeds : Below is the cost of one acre: COST OF MAISTURE AT PLAJS'TATIOX. 250 pounds soluble bones .... $8.25 165 lbs. No. 1 Peruvian Guano. 6.25 100 pounds of plaster 1.25 Mixing and putting on 25 . $17.00 Horse 2 days, $1 per day $2.00 Plough hand, 2 days, .50 per day 1.00 Hoe hand, 2 days, .50 per day . . 1.00 Dropping seed 25 Picking 10.80 Manure 17.00 Whole expense per acre ....$32.05 XET PROCEEDS. Proceed sales of 32 bales . .$4,000.00 Less expenses $32.05 per acre 502.20 Clear dividends $3,487.20 This shows a clear dividend, per acre, of $217.95 * * With slave labor, my cotton crops averaged from ten to twelve bales per hand, with other crops in proportion. I am for the plan that preserves the capital best, and pays the largest divi- dends. I have no doubt, that on good cotton land, a fair year, I could make one hundred bales of cotton, with one No. 1 mule: Commence operations the first day of December; subsoil every acre; use twenty-five dollars' worth of manure per acre; and finish planting the 1st of May; cultivate sixty acres. Note by the Editor. For the purpose of illustrating cer- tain points in the teachings of Mr. Dickson, I desire to report a field of cotton, that I visited on his original farm — a part of the 266 acres upon which he first started farming, and which cost him fifty cents per acre. This field of cotton had been planted on the 13th of June. Every boll, to the very topmost was open, with beau- tiful white cotton. Not a green boll was . to be seen, and as not a boll had been picked, it was, indeed a beauty, and looked like a snow-bank. As stated, this crop was planted on the 13th day of June, and I saw it on the 10th day of November. The crop had grow.n, matured and opened. CULTIVATION OF COTTON. 51 to the last top boll, before the 10th of November. By actual count, it had on it 1,400 pounds per acre — nearly a bale. This land was a blowing sand, without clay subsoil, the lowest grade of land known to Middle Geor- gia. It had refused to yield a living to its owner, and he had sold it for the paltry sum of flftiy cents per acre, and moved off to keep from starving. This field of cotton, which I remem- ber was about twenty acres, had been treated^ planted and cultivated by Mr. Dickson, and fertilized to the ex- tent of about $15 per acre. Cotton was then selling for about 20 per pound. Hence, this 20 acre field netted him fifteen hundred dollars, less the ex- pense of cultivation. Now, what does this crop demonstrate? 1st. That, under proper treatment,. culture and fertilization, paying crops can be grown upon poor lands, even upon blowing sand, which is the very lowest grade. 2d. That the seasons in this lati- tude are sulficiently long for the cot- ton crop, and that the planting may be delayed, even to the 13th day of June, with the possibility of a full crop. It shows the folly of planting summer crops in the winter. 3d. That even the very lowest grades of land can be made to pro- duce paying crops by liberal use of commercial fertilizers, with proper culture. 4th. That real success in farming depends not so much upon the quality and strength of the land as upon the scientific attainments and executive ability of the farmer who cultivates it. EUITOR. A Country Home. (JHAPTER IX. Growing Wheat. Wheat, as all other annual crops requires deep, mellow and productive soil, and hence deep preparation is indispensable to large crops. The popular impression, that wheat is a surface root plant, and requires no deep breaking or subsoiling, leads to practical error and failure in the cul- ture of this crop. These advocates claim that for wheat the surface soil should not be turned under, nor should the subsoil be broken, because the plant is supported in its growth by roots that spring ' out laterally near the surface and simply traverse the surface soil. But what are the facts in regard to this plant? Wheat has two sets of roots: the first springing from the seed and penetrating downward, while the sec- ond set push themselves laterally near the surface of the ground from the first joint! Hence the roots of wheat penetrate and traverse the entire depth of the broken and fertile soil, and extract their food from every part of the soil. The product of the crop will be found to be in the ratio of its extent and fertility. It likewise requires, as do corn and other crops, a deeply broken soil to gather and retain a sufficiency of moisture to enliven the plant in its growth and fruitage — to keep it from famishing. The same class of land that grows cotton will grow wheat. In this sec- tion of Georgia I would select a brown or mulatto soil with a moderate gravel; but wheat will succeed better on heavier lands than cotton. In my system of rotation of crops, wheat follows the corn crop. As soon as the corn has been gathered, and the field grazed off by the stock, broadcast the land with two or three hundred pounds of my "compost" to the acre, and sow from a half to a bushel of wheat to the acre, accord- ing to the strength of the land. With a small-sized turn-plow turn over the land about four inches deep, following in each furrow with a good subsoiler. When finished, drag a fine brush over the land with a pair of horses, always moving the brush on a level, if it re- quires to cross the plowing. With me this plan has succeeded well. Another plan is to break deep, sub- soil and harrow the land. Then sow the wheat and manure, and harrow in, then roll it. Still a third plan may be tried, which looks simply to raising grass, with a prospect of having a crop or not of wheat: Sow the seed and the manure, if you intend any, at the same time. Turn over the land with a turn-plow, four inches deep. Brush or not as you may have time. If the wheat comes sufficiently to pay for cutting, do so, if not, turn the stock on it — xising it as a pasture during the balance of the year. Rust in Wheat. Rust damages hill and dry land less than wet or low lands. So far as my GROWING WHEAT. 53 observation has been, rust is entirely from the atmosphere, increased by the condition of the land, and I know of no preventive for it. The early varieties are less subject to it. Later varieties produce more per acre, pro- vided they are not attacked. Wheat can be saved with a com- mon scythe blade, or more profitably where the reaper can be used, always using a thresh as the means of get- ting it out. The main profit derived from the culture of wheat is the fact, that it leaves you, after cutting, a large quantity of vegetable matter, to be incorporated into the soil, to in- crease the quantity of cotton per acre the succeeding year. Patriotism says make your meat and bread at home and be independent. All of the above plans are applica- ble to every ^other species of small grain. The cultivation of small grain is necessary to carry out a system of rotation of crops and if you do not sow them you must rest your corn lands. Now choose between the two systems. Sow small grain, or rest your corn lands. You can hardly fail to make less on them than the worth of the seed in sowing. The reader will observe that I have not attached much importance to the wheat culture as a crop on my farm; nor do I advocate its culture as a crop, in the cotton belt, because cot- ton as a crop, pays much better. I only advise it as a part of my rota- tion system, for the benefit of my cotton and corn lands. This field that I put in wheat would rest any- how the next year. The manure and the breaking in the fall will contri- bute to the production of a fine crop of grass and weeds the next spring, even should the crop of wheat prove unworthy of the scythe. The land had to be rested, and it paid to prepare and fertilize it for a crop of vegetable matter to recuperate the soil for the next cotton crop. But my crops of wheat have paid directly in results and ten fold in improving my land for other crops. Under the policy that I advocate as a farmer — "Let us be independent," I do advise every farmer to plant, at least, a few acres in wheat. These few acres, heavily manured, will give him his supply of Hour, and, in addition the rest, and crop of stubble and grass will wonder- fully recuperate the land, and return the profit in the cotton crop next year. Note. — I would emphasize some of these points, as stated above for the wheat culture, illustrating two cardi- nal principles as components of my system of farming: 1. In contra-distincticn to the popu- lar theory, that wheat is a surface root crop, and hence, must be scratched in with a scooter plow. I advise the practice of turning under v/heat land to the depth of, at least four inches, putting the surface soil that many inches deep under, and, in addition, breaking the subsoil be- neath. I advise this upon the broad fact relating to vegetable life — that all annual plants, for thin growth and fruitage, utilize and appropriate the soil nutriment of the entire available depth and area of pulverized and fer- tile soil allotted to them by space. The surface scratching in leaves the plants no depth to traverse for the ob- tainment of food, and hence the crop is practically impoverished, and the yield a failure in results. It appropri- ates the strength of an inch depth of soil, whereas, it could as easily have appropriated the entire fertile proper- ties of four inches depth. This prin- ciple is as sound in regard to the wheat crop as with corn and cotton. 2. The wheat crop, the same as other annual crops, requires a depth of broken and mellow soil to imbibe and retain a sufficiency of moisture to prevent the crop from famishing during accidental spring drought. These facts which are true in prin- ciple with other crops, hold good in the wheat crop. Hence I advise farm- ers to sow in wheat, oats and rye, one- third or one-fourth of their tillable land, and for the following reasons: 1. With the fertilization, turning and brushing as first directed, the crop will pay, per se, a handsome dividend* 2. It indirectly pays a large per- centage in the way of permanent im- provement of the land by furnishing an abundant supply of vegetable mat- 54 DICKSON'S SYSTEM OF FARMING. ter from the straw stubble and ac- companying crop of grass and weeds, which the land, more than anything else, needs. 3. The turning into the soil in the fall a good supply of manure, greatly increases the crop of spontaneous growth that springs up the next spring, the year of rest, to shade the land, protects it from the summer's sun, and adds an additional supply of vegetable mold to the soil. The profits, then, may be counted — not only in the crop of grain raised, but in turning under of vegetable matter in the fall, and the more luxuriant crop of weeds during the year of rest, promoted by the manuring of the wheat crop. It will leave the land in doubly, a better condition for the fol- lowing cotton crop, than if it had not been sown in wheat, as directed. Hence, in carrying out the rotation system suggested, I repeat the in- junction — sow wheat and oats, if not for the sake of the grain crop, do it for the good and permanent improve- ment of the land — recollecting that the general treatment of lands may not be neglected by any farmer ex- pecting real ultimate success. Hereford Yearling. CHAPTER X. f Potatoes, Turnips and Vegetables, On !he two Field System to Save Labor. Select two Plats of Land lor this Purpose. Turnips. FVom the 20th of July to the 15th ,of August is the best time to sow tur- nips. Lay off the rows three feet distant, opening the furrows six inches deep. Use compost and commercial ma- nures, with ashes sufficient to make it very rich. Bed the land the same as for planting cotton, and strike it off. Open by hand with a little hook. In the small furrow deposit the seed and cover them about an inch deep. When they have three or four leaves, shave through the drill with a hoe, four inches broad, leaving from two to four plants in a hill. A few days afterwards, side as you would cotton. When the leaves are about three inches long, go over and cut any grass that may have been left, and thin the plants to one plant in a hill. In case, afterwards, there should be any grass or pusley, it must be taken up clean, leaving nothing to come to seed but the turnips. The next spring this is to be the potato patch. Sweet Potatoes. If the land be not rich enough for potatoes, some commercial manures may be added in the bed, as for cot- ton. Plant the potato draws twelve inches apart in the ridge. I prefer them thick, as they will not grow so large, and will make more bushels per acre. Cultivate the potatoes with a sweep as you would cotton. When you wish to lay by, you can use a sweep to set the hill. Side with a sweep, and with an old sweep whose point has been worn short, and putting your clevis on the top side of the beam of the plow, run out the middle. Hold the plow handles well up, and make the team move briskly; and if the first furrow does not throw the bed out sufficiently, run your sweep back in the same furrow, mak- ing two sweeps to each middle. You will have a nice Hat bed; and if this work has been well done no hoe will be needed in the potato patch. After frosts in the fall is the proper time for digging and saving potatoes. The work should not be commenced till after the morning frost has melted away, as the least frost will prevent them from keeping. With a long scooter plow run on each side to show the potatoes, and then with a long shovel plow run in the middle, splitting out the potato ridge, and throwing all the potatoes out. The hands should follow the plow and carefully pick them up. Potatoes should be handled without bruising. I prefer good open dry weather for digging. There are many ways to save potatoes. I will give only one method. Dig a hole, a round circle, about six inches deep, where the water will not settle; fill it full of straw; pour about fifteen or twenty bushels of potatoes on top of the straw; and then round them all. Cover the potatoes DICKSON'S SYSTEM OF FARMING. with straw; a few corn stalks may be laid around the straw, but this is not essential. Set up your forks, and cover well. In one or two days, put dirt around the hill one-half way up, as thick as you intend, but not less than seven or eight inches; and as the potatoes sweat and dry out, you can continue to add dirt until you get to the top of the hill. They keep either with a small hole left at the top, or none, about equally well. By having two lots, the two lots will produce three crops each year — a crop of wheat, a crop of potatoes, and a crop of turnips — wheat first, turnips second, and potatoes third. Sow wheat as soon as you dig pota- toes; as soon as the wheat is off plow the land for turnips; plant the tur- nips the last of July or the first of August; use them out, except a few rows for seed, by the time to plant potatoes. Sugar Cane. My experience in the growing of this crop has been very limited, but quite successful. I have found a rich alluvial soil, moderately dry, or a rich heavy clay land the best for su- gar-cane. Thinner land, a little more sandy, I have found produced cane that contained more sugar to the size of the stalk, but not yielding so much in quantity. About the middle of Februarj-, is about the best time to plant in this latitude. The land should be manured heavily by broad- casting compost or commercial ma- nures. Turn this under deeply and follow with subsoiler. Make the rows with a large shovel six feet wide, and plant the cane, covering with two small shovel furrows. Sugar cane has a greater quantity of roots than corn, and hence more care should be taken not to destroy them by deep culture. Plow lightly with a large sweep. In bedding down the cane, for seed, it should be stripped of all the fodder, to prevent its heating the cane and thus destroying the eyes. Occasion- ally lay cross-pieces to keep the cane from lying too close together and causing it to heat. Cover it sufficiently deep to protect from cold. This is only to instruct those who wish to make small quantities. Those who have followed it as a business must cer- tainly know more about it as a busi- ness than I do. Ground Peas. Ground peas are sometimes culti- vated between corn, for stock. For a patch for family use, choose a plat of good mulatto land, clay subsoil, moderately rich, with a little addition of the "Compound." Lay off about three feet distant, three inches deep, and drop the seed in the ground four inches apart, and cover lightly. The time to plant is as early as they will escape the frost. Cultivate on a level with a sweep. Keep the ground loose under the vine, and never cover the vines when they begin to run. Tliere is one sort that runs up straight. Top them off. If the land is too sandy, or too rich, the pods will fail to have the fruit in them, and make what is called pops. The Vegetable Garden. The vegetable garden should be made intensely rich by hauling on compost or barn-yard manures every year. This should be trenched in, or turned in with a large turn-plow and deeply subsoiled every year. This will keep the soil rich and deeply mel- lowed, and thus prepared for every garden crop. The barn-yard manures will furnish an ample supply of vege- table matter, and the ammonia and other fertile elements incorporated with it will keep the soil sufficiently rich for the production of any garden vegetable. But during the planting, other chemical manures may be ad- ded to the several crops planted. As the safest practice, if you wish unfail- ing success in garden crops, keep your garden spot well enriched and deeply subsoiled. It will thus be ready all the time for any crop and for any succession of crops during the year. Remember you must manure every year if you wish a fine garden. I will only mention the culture of a few of the most usual vegetables grown for family use. Irish Potatoes — Require a rich loamy soil, a little inclined to clay. Prepare, plant and cultivate as fol- lows: After making the land rich. VEGETABLES— TWO-FIELD SYSTEM. break and subsoil deep. Lay off the rows four feet apart, and six inches deep. Put in compost or commercial manures around the potatoes after dropping them about fifteen inches in the hill. They may be dropped whole or cut in halves; cover level with the surface. The crop may now be mulched with pine or wheat straw, eight inches deep. Or wait till the crop is well up; then give it one working, with a small hill made round the potatoes, and then mulch with straw. When the year is seasonable, the crop suc- ceeds finely without mulching; but the mulching obviates the disastrous effects of drouth and secures, without failure, a good crop of potatoes. Two or three different plantings should be made^in October, the first of January, the first of February, and the last planting about the first of March. A fall crop may be planted in June, but it will not succeed unless it is seasonable. They do not keep well in this climate, but may be kept suffi- ciently well by treating them as you would sweet potatoes. There should be less quantity put in the hill, which must always be sheltered and kept dry. Cabbage. — This crop only succeeds as a summer crop in this latitude, as I have found it very difficult to raise fall cabbages. The land must be clay, and made rich with manures and phosphates. The soil must be deep and mellow so as to make the growth of the plant luxuriant. If the crop does not grow off rapidly, the plants will not head well, and hence will prove a failure. In planting, give them four feet by two in the drill. Cul- tivate very shallow, and work them frequently to keep the surface fresh and readily permeable to the atmos- pheric gases. If sowed early, look for cabbages from the middle of May till September. The common collards are cultivated in the same manner. Beets. — For the cultivation of this crop I have a peculiar way, prefer- ring the small young, tender beet, never to exceed an inch and a half in diameter for the best in quality. To obtain this j'ou must have a rich soil, and very deep preparation. Plant once a month. Sow your seed quite thick, and you may commence eating by the time they are half an inch in diameter. The more thrifty plants will grow ahead, and you can take them out and thus thin the balance. I prefer the long blood beet, but the turnip beet for forwardness. The beet crop needs the same shallow cul- tivation as other crops. Tomatoes. — The enriched and deeply prepared soil as advised for •^'ow garden will grow tomatoes luxuriantly. They require nothing but rich land, planting and cultivating. I pre fer the small cone, not to exceed an inch and a quarter or an inch and a half in diameter. They are always the' best on the fresh vines. To ob- tain the young vines plant frequently. If you do not have the plants, you may cut off the limbs and transplant. This crop needs brushing or framing up to support the vines during fruit- age. This is absolutely necessary. Onions. — Are easily made, requir- ing only a rich, soil, deeply prepared. In addition to other manures, ashes and hen manure are fine. Mark off the land after preparation, twenty in- ches. Set your plants about two in- ches in the ground, four inches apart. With light culture, keep the crop clean. Melons. — Should be made on. a large scale, both watermelons, nut- megs and muskmelons. A patch should be planted every two weeks, from the first of March to the first of August. Fresh vines always produce the best melons. Moderately sandy or loamy land is best adapted to their cultivation. Old fields, or pine lands that have been cut down and let lie for one or two years for straw to rot. is one of the best varieties of soil.. The ground should be laid off about twelve feet each way. After it has been deeply ploughed, dig a hole about three feet square, and put in eighteen inches of manure. Thus prepared and planted, it should be cultivated as other crops. Use as much manure as you would for ten or twelve hills of corn. Plough them as long as the vines will admit of it; even when they are three or four feet 58 • DICKSON'S SYSTEM OF FARMING. long you can turn them up and plough them. Almost any variety of land will make watermelons. First year's land I have never thought quite so good for watermelons. If you wish to make large watermelons, leave but one vine in the hill; watch your patch. and pull off those that have a runted appearance early; let them get ripe before pulling. The cantaloupe, nutmeg and musk- melon may be all cultivated the same way, requiring only less distance, say six feet. Only Good Stock Pay. CHAPTER XI. Fruit Culture and Care of Stock. STOCK. Apples require a strong, clay land. They succeed well in coves and val- leys. They should be planted about three or four inches deeper than they are in the nursery, to prevent their blowing down. Train the body four feet high. Pruning should be done annually, before the limbs become of any size, and kept moderately open. The land should be cultivated every other year in cotton, and the succeed- ing year turn under two green crops of peas. It will do well if you ma- nure highly every year in cotton, al- ways returning as many seed back as were taken off. Caterpillars should be taken off clean every year before they eat the leaves off. Examine for worms about the roots and other places. If the plough traces skin the trees while young, a black bug will get in the bark and kill the tree. Ap- ples do not succeed very well in this latitude; but enough can be made for home use for cider, and supply the vinegar. Cotton succeeds much better under apple trees than it does under peach trees. Plant apple trees twenty feet each way. I have no particular va- rieties that I can recommend with cer- tainly. Summer fruits do better than fall and winter fruits. Peaches require strong, clay rolling land, riot very rich, planted ten feet in the row, and sixteen feet apart. No crop can be raised to any profit on the land, except peas be turned under. 1 find this thick planting always to pro- duce less rotten peaches and sweeter ones; the reason, as I suppose, is, that the trees evaporate the excessive moisture by being planted thick, to a greater extent than when they are planted thin. I have found by obser- vation, that peaches in an orchard thickly planted, rot a great deal less than an open tree out in the field. The late varieties require richer land than the forward kind. I have entirely failed to raise pears in the sandy lands. Strawberries. — Strawberries require a mulatto soil inclined to clay. They require a deep cultivation. The manure should be scrapings from rich lands, ashes and phosphates, with a small sprinkling of salt and plaster; and as land is cheap in this country, I would recommend a large patch, since by working them they could be repaid, ft is left to the taste of the cultivator whether he will have his strawberries near his house or near a stream. After the ground is thoroughly spaded or subsoiled, ploughed deep and levelled, lay off the rows by a small mark four feet apart; plant each hill from eighteen to twenty inches apart. Cultivate level, and clean as you would cotton. They may be either mulched in the spring by straw, or kept clean by cultivation, as the cul- tivator may choose. One plat will an- swer the purpose. The second year, make a mark in the middle of the row and spade it up deep, adding fresh ma- 60 DICKSON'S SYSTEM OF FARMING. nures and vegetable matter. Late in the fall, or early in the spring, set out a row in the middle, and at the end of tile bearing season the old row may be hoed up. Every fall the patch should be ploughed, subsoiled and levelled, and a small quantity of ma- nure added. Repeat the operation an- nually, as long as you wish to eat strawberries, cream and sugar. Raspberries require n deep, loamy soil. Plant them in rows six feet apart. Set up sticks to keep them straight. Keep them clean by hoeing" and ploughing, as you would corn. Af- ter bearing, cut down all the old canes. Another mode is to plant them around the edge of the garden, and tie them back to the garden fence, and keep them worked clean. If you plant sutliciently, and cultivate them either way, you will never fail to have a plenty. They are a certain fruit. I have had but little experience with the other small fruits. Vinegar IVlaking. Put the cider into a very tight bar- rel, and at the end of two or three months draw it off, and put it into a new barrel. If it does not have the appearance of a sufficient body and proper acidity, add a little whisky once a month, till you give it a suffi- cient body. Time will convert it into first-rate vinegar. Cider Making. Cider, in a great measure, depends on the quality of the fruit from which it is obtained. A variety of crabs, known as cider apples, is of the first class for cider; many other varieties of apples make good cider, such as the Shockley, Romanite. It is neces- sary that apples should be sound and fully ripe to make a first-class article of cider. Beat or grind fine, and let it remain twelve hours without press- ing. Press out all the juice, and strain it into a clean barrel, it will keep better when the barrel is full, and stand the weather better. To let it ferment like wine will improve the quality of the cider. To make cider to keep through the winter, put into it one pound of clari- fied sugar to the gallon. To make it for bottling, and long keeping, put two pounds sugar to the gallon, and let it ferment. . At the end of six months, it may be bottled, and will keep till used. I have some now that is fourteen years old. If you desire to make fresh cider of it at any time, put small quantities of it into a jug, add about half the quantity of water, let it stand till it begins to ferment, and it will be ready for use, having the appearance and taste of cider just pressed, only a purer article. Note — By the Editor — A little pleas- antry over a bottle of wine. — A few years since, I was dining with Mr. Dickson, with a number of other gen- tlemen. After we had been served with a sumptuous feast, according to the style and habit of the "prince of farmers," we were tendered a glass of fine wine, accompanied with tiie question which was extended to al! the gentlemen present at the table: "What wine do you take this to be?" The gentlemen, one by one responded, some guessing one brand and some another of the finest known brands of wine. Mr. Dickson smilingly an- swered: "This is nothing but apple cider, and the glass of sweet cider at your plates is exactly the same, with the addition of water and a little su- gar. It is cider that I made several years ago, and it is constantly improv- ing in flavor and richness of taste." The ruse was enjoyed by all the gen- tlemen present, and a social compro- mise effected by telling us the pro- cess of making it, wiiich was as above described. But the joke was enjoyable withal; for the gentlemen unanimously de- clared that they had never tasted finer wine than was Mr. Dickson's cider. Care of Horses. To get the greatest amount of la- bor from mules and horses without in- juring them, requires the greatest care in feeding, watering and housing. Where oats can be easily made, half feed on oats and half on corn, with fodder and hay, is the best food for horses. I have long contemplated grinding the corn or oats, and baking it into bread for horses, but never tried the experiment. I think that FRUIT CULTURE AND CARE OF STOCK. 61 would be the best preventive of colic of anything that has ever been tried. Large, dry and open stalls, one mule to each stall, I consider the best mode of housing them. It is necessary to take all the advantages for working them with ease. Kindness is neces- sary, the horse doing much better when treated kindly than when fret- ted and abused. If a mule or horse is well treated by those who work them, he will become attached to them and do better service. Raising hogs. I will simply give my practice un- der slavery, which will be equally etR- cient now, when freedmen become more h-onest. Always select the best boars and sows out of the best breeds. Having carried the laud through a state of improvement with guanos for a number of years, incor- porating bone dust into the soil, it will produce a fine growth of weeds on the land after laying by, which will grow finely until they are turned in. The practice is to move the hogs along before the plough, from field to field giving them only a bushel of corn to a hundred in number. Let them feed on the supply of turnips during January, February and March, and on the rye and grass until about the first of May, then return the liogs to their permanent pastures, and let them run on lands that have been at rest. They will not injure the weeds at this time, and having such a fine start they will continue to improve. Having sown the previous year some of my corn land in wheat, oats and rye, and saved what I could of them, being on an average of about two- thirds of the crop, I turn the hogs on this field, where they will be well sus- tained until pea-time. If you wish to fatten early, plant a field in early peas; turn your stock into the corn and peas. I have al- ways been accustomed to put peas in every corn row, and corn land being in good heart with former manuring, would make peas sufficient to last un- til February. Peas never kill hogs; but particular kinds of soil in the field may kill them, such as clay, pipe-clay, and pfairie lands. The best preven- tive is a plenty of vegetables, such as potatoes, pumpkins, turnips, and a plenty of salt and copperas. On my land, none die from eating peas. About the middle of August, select out your hogs you wish to fatten; feed them with corn awhile, say three or four weeks, or until the pea field is ready for them. When they have eaten off the peas, put them up in pens, well littered, three or four in a pen, and feed them on corn. The best way is to have the corn ground, and cook it for them. Under this system, I used to raise from eight to twelve hundred pounds of pork per each hand. By fencing the whole lands, many things accumu-^ late that sustain hogs, which amount to a great deal in the whole. Stock should never run on the same field two years in succession, but shguld be changed, in order to allow an accumu- lation of worms, bugs, mussels, fish, and many kinds of roots — all of which hogs devour greedily. They are also fond of herbs and wild fruits. Hogs in the swamp feed to a con- siderable extent on leaves that have been rafted up, and are in a decaying state under the water. Tliis I know from killing wild hogs in good order, and, on opening their maws and in- testines, have found nothing in them but these decayed leaves and muck, and from having often seen them eat- ing these leaves in branches and swamps. Saving Bacon, When you kill your pork hogs, cut the bacon, spread it, and let it lie long enough to get out all the animal heat. Then salt it down — covering it thor- oughly with salt. When it has salted long enough, hang it and let it well dry; then subject it to the following process to keep it sound and sweet by keeping off the skipper fly: Get you some ashes, by burning sweetgum, hickory, and maple, either separately or all mixed. Take down your meat about the first of March, wipe it well to get all the skipper eggs off. Have a rack of round sticks, on which other sticks are laid twelve inches apart ; lay the meat on it, and cover over the fleshy part well with ashes. As soon as the skipper fly makes its appearance, use the com- 62 DICKSON'S SYSTEM OF FARMING, mon fly poisons in smokehouses, made up just as for house flies; renew it twice a week, and it will attract the attention of the skipper flies, and kill them, and run out the rats, too. If the above receipt is followed strictly, tuere will never be a skipper in the whole number of your hams and shoulders. A dark and tight house is always preferable, so that the venti- lation comes down through the top of the house, which should be well wired to keep the flies from coming down. Honey and the Habits of Bees. Honey may be obtained in sufiicient quantities for the use of families, by boxes simply being made of twelve- inch plank, two feet, four inches long. A little attention is requisite in order to keep the worms from collecting ground the edge of the boxes, and doing up and eating the honey. Always have hives ready when the bees swarm in the spring of the year, and a good place for them to settle on; saw off the limb when they have set- tled, place it r J the mouth of the empty gum, which should be elevated about four inches. With a little at- tention, the bees will soon go in. At night, move the gum to the bench where it is to stand permanently, which should always be in a shady place, and protected from the rain. About the 10th to the 15th of May, is the proper time to take the honey out, which may be done by tying a sheet around the mouth of the gum, laying it on a table, with the head a little the lowest, blowing in a lit- tle smoke, then with a knife, with a little blade, cut across the honey, and take it out in squares, scrape the sides of the gum clean, and return it to the bench from whence it came. If handled nicely, the hive will be equal to a new hive. This is the easiest and plainest way to obtain honey. The improved hive, with supers on top, furnishes a more neat and easy way of taking it. Honey is obtained from flowers, and from the honey-dew that comes on a dry year. The comb is secreted from the abdomen of the bees: young bees only being capable of producing wax. No hive has more than one queen. I have sometimes known two queens to come out, which fact you can as- certain soon by the bees being agi- tated. Looking under the gum, or around the hive, you will find one of the queens taken a prisoner. If you take her out from the gum, all will be quiet. In other instances, I have found the hives without any queen, by the agitation of the bees. Look round on the ground and other places, and you will find the queen with a small knot of bees on her; take her up and carry her to the gum, and all will be quiet. Bees have not changed their habits in the memory of man. They raise 'quite a number of queens in swarm* ing time. If any of them have the least blemish in the world, they are put to death, and thrown out of the hive. I have often found as many as six or eight of them in front of the hive. On examination, I could see the fault for which she was killed — she having been imperfect in some particular. The same thing is true of the neutral bee; each one is exam- ined, and should the least blemish be found on it, it is put to death. When the swarm is perfect, and the queen also, the first favorable day they swarm out. There are many other habits I have noticed in the bee. Some ventilate the hive, in hot weather, by fanning with their wings; some carry in wa- ter, and some compound it with bread to make food for the young bees; some bring the honey, and the others the bee-bread; but no two kinds of bread are ever deposited in the same cell. Everything is order, system and industry. All the cracks in the gums the bees seal with sweetgum. I have, when a boy, often taken it from the gums and chewed it. Our Present System of Labor. The present system of labor does not exceed sixty per cent, of slave la- bor, involving a loss of fully one-third of the labor by the men going to vil- lages, railroads, mining and other en- terprises. One-half of the women and children are absent, housekeeping, idling, and other things. Under the slave system, the women and children were the mainspring of cotton-rais- FRUIT CULTURE AND CARE OF STOCK. 63 ing. The loss of labor and ineffi- ciency of labor, are about equally compensated by the increased price of our products. One of the reasons why there is a deficiency of labor is, that the men take Saturdays to go to public meetings; they do not work as many hours in the day as they for- merly did, and their work is not of as good a character. Each family must have its housekeeper and washer, and must send to mill, if they only send a half-bushel of corn. A great loss in their labor also results in their hav- ing to stop to gather fire-wood, and attend to their gardens and patches. The only partial compensation we will ever get for this loss and ineffi- ciency of labor, is the increased price of our products — the high price of cotton. I submit, is it good policy to encourage immigration to bring down these prices, and lose the only bene- fit that we can ever derive from* the result of emancipation? The best method of hiring, I con- sider to be wages — a contract setting forth the duties of each party. The policy of managing freedmen is, to act firmly, and truly, and honestly with them, and require them to do the same; and as a good stimulus to do this, never pay them more than half wages till the end of the time for which they contracted to work. On plantations of any considerable size, the actual necessaries should be kept, and sold to the freedmen at a profit suflBcient to pay all risk and interest on the money. Those who work on shares should divide the profits and responsibilities with the land-owner. The rent of the land should be one- third of all the crops gathered; an- other third should pay for the horse- power, machinery and tools. The la- borer should have one-third, he find- ing his own hoe and axe, it being im- possible to keep such things as plan- tation tools. The whole direction of the labors, the management, gather- ing and the sale of the crop should be held by the land-owner. What is left on the fields, and the use of the pas- ture, should be the land-owner's, after the hands cease to gather the crops. As the land-owner furnishes the land, and all the expenses of the tools, the laborer should pay him two-thirds the value of all the days that he was not employed. One objection to the cropping is this; you can not carry the improve- ment plan to the extent that is desir- able. The laborers are unwilling to do as deep ploughing as is required — to purchase as much fertilizers as will pay a profit. You would lose the serv- ices of the laborers on rainy days, and at other times between crops, that might be used to great advantage on a farm. In hiring laborers, a man should nevf^i' allow less than fifty per cent, profit on the labor, for he is taking the risk, and paying for the laborer, the land always coming in for a third. Where the farm is rented to parties of capital that furnish everything, the land should be kept up by manuring, the fences should be repaired, all the droppings of the farm saved and ap- plied to the crops, the buildings should have all the repairs done on them where mechanics are not re- quired; the land should retain one- half. No renter or cropper should ever think of having stock to the ex- tent of depredating on the employer's land; should the contract be made for raising stock, I know of no reason why the land should not draw an equal proportion of stock as well as of crops. Seed and shucks should never be removed from the land. When new renters come, furnish them seed, and let them use the shucks; when they leave, let them leave the shucks. If they make more than one crop, let them use the seed for manure until they leave. The way to make the estimate to get the fifty* per cent, on the work, is to take off one-third of the cotton crop for the land, one-third for the fences, in- cluding the machinery, and then give the laborers, in wages, what would be equal to two-thirds of one-third of an average crop. The reason for reserv- ing this one-third is. that the em- ployer takes all the risks of storms, drouths, worms, caterpillars and boll- worms, and of prices lessening and of every other disaster. Let the la- borer share the risk and insurance. * * * All of my trained hands 64 DICKSON'S SYSTEM OF FARMING. have now applied to come back, pre- ferring one-third of the crop gathered on my place, to one-half on the places worked last year. Whilst I owned them, they told me to plant thirty- eight acres in corn and cotton, and seventeen acres in wheat and oats, and they would cultivate it with my aid, in preference to twenty acres un- der an overseer, and could do it with more ease. My crops before the war, averaged me $1,000 per hand. I di- vide thus: $200 for manure, $200 for horse-power, tools, etc., $300 for land and $300 for labor. My estimate is now, when hands work well, to di- vide as follows: First, take my pay for all purchased manvires; the bal- ance to go — one-third for land rent, one-third for horse-power, and all tools, including gins, wagons, carts, wheat thresher, etc., hoes and axes excepted, which each hand should furnish, and one-third to the laborer, being divided among the hands that produce; the cottonseed to be re- turned to the land, and all crops left in the field ungathered to go to the owner of the land. The farmer should, by all means, save a portion of his income accumu- lated from year to year, and get in a condition to buy everything for cash. Sell cotton for cash. Other things may or may not be sold on time. When you mortgage your crop, you lose your independence to that extent. Keep a cash capital equal to one year's expenses. Invest in stocks that are readily converted into mon- ey; it will enable you to hold your cot- ton until you can get a price that will be remunerative. Make all supplies at home that can be made; and as you accumulate capital, you can e/iter into joint stock companies for manu- facturing, banking, discount(ing — fill- up the whole vacuum, so that a for- eigner's dollar can find no investment here. But having a mortgage on your property, will create a tax for all future labor. In the course of time, the planters will have the capital here to export their cotton directly fo Europe — bring- ing goods directly here, and saving all accumulations of profit, freight, and other contingencies. The plan- ters in the Cotton States can save forty millions of dollars annually, without feeling the loss of necessaries or luxuries. This forty millions of dollars, if invested in railroads and manufactories, would soon put us on a par with any portion of the world. In a few years, this forty millions of dollars, w'ith the interest on the first forty millions, would enable us to purchase a large portion of the bonds of the world. Tribute would come from every portion of the world to the cotton regions, instead of going out as it now does. We are making about three hundred millions of dol- lar's worth of cotton a year, at the prices It has ruled for the last three years. This forty millions of dollars, counted as income, will amount to near fourteen per cent, of the aggre- gate value of the cotton crop, and any people that can save such per cent, can certainly become independent. Cotton does the best in this lati- tude, but to continue to make it pay, the cotton planter should make his whole supplies — corn, cotton, meat, and everything necessary to run the farm; then the balance of the labor will make more money than if the Vt^hole labor was engaged in making cotton, by the increased price of the cotton. What corn you wish to use at home, you should not count the cost of making, but make it, and you will be remunerated in the increased price of the cotton. Encourage manufactories, that they may be supplied with the products of your farms, spinning up the cotton, working up the raw hides into shoes, that you may get them without any carrying trade to any distant portion of the world to be manufactured and brought back — get them at a less price, and make a profit on the prod- ucts furnished them. Take this la- bor from the cotton field, and increase the price of your cotton in the same ratio. CHAPTER XII. On Immigration Editor Spaeta, Ga., June 10th, 1869. Southern Cultivator: I wish to call the attention of the cotton planters of the South to the sub- ject of immigration. It is one of great- est interest, and if successful, I think will prove destructive to the cotton in- terest. I do not wish my views to pre- vail unless they are right. I wish both sides to be heard, and hope those who can wield the pen, and who agree with me, will be heard; the other side has been heard already, and we have been taxed to promote this cause. The State of Georgia is moving for our de- struction. The negro we have with us, and we can not get rid of him if we would. They will not die out, as most of our Northern friends and many of our peo- ple think. The next census will show a large increase. The only way to make it tolerable for them to live amongst us is to give them employ- ment. With full employment they will steal less, be more law-abiding, and a less nuisance in every way. Do we want more labor, and for what? The agricultural interest at the South is chiefly valuable for its production of cotton, tobacco and rice. Can we make more money by doubling the quantity of labor than we can out of what we now have? Do numbers increase the quantity of labor pro rata, or will the dividends be greater for all concerned? Can the first million of people in Geor- gia, having the first choice of lands to cultivate, and the balance for pasture. make more or less than the second mil- lion, having the poorest half to culti- vate, and no waste land for stock to graze on? Is the second million likely to be more skillful, industrious, law- abiding and enterprising, etc.? I think history teaches us that a population, with plenty of room and land, are more cheaply governed than a dense popu- lation — can live better, and can have more labor to spare for improvements. What country has built the same amount of railroads and factories as the United States? The United States having plenty of lands to cultivate, by selecting the best, can, with one-half of its laborers, make a plenty of all the products of the soil, whilst the other half can build railroads and ma- chinery of all kinds and work them. The Cotton States, with their present labor, can build more railroads, erect more factories, develop more mines, carry education and refinement to a higher point, than if the population was increased four-fold. With cotton at twenty-five cents per pound, you have money to do whatever you wish col- lectively. In 1848 and '49, with nine hundred thousand to one million bales of cotton in Liverpool, cotton sold in Augusta at four and half to five and a half cents. With three hundred and fifty thousand to four hundred thou- sand bales at present in Liverpool, cot- ton is selling in Augusta from twenty- five to twenty-nine cents per pound. Why do you wish to make the change? Our Northern friends say if we do not 66 DICKSON'S SYSTEM OP FARMING. produce cotton cheaper, we will lose the trade. I am willing to lose it, if it can only be held by making cheap cot- ton. If they, would take a little , more interest in preventing the loss of our liberty, instead of the loss of the cotton trade, it would inure to the benefit of both sec- tions. Give us our liberties and consti- tutional rights, with our best men to represent us in all departments, and we can make as much cotton as the world wants, at fair prices, if it be ten mil- lions of bales, without an outside man or dollar. Good government would do more to develop this country than all the men and money in the world. Cotton planters, it is not to your in- terest to sell your land at a mere nomi- nal price. How can you invest your money to any better advantage? Land must advance in price. In thirty years, without a single immigrant, Georgia will have a population of two millions of people, the sons and daughters of the present population. Be patient; wait for the natural increase, and what may voluntarily come. Do not spend your money to hasten an over-popu- lated country. It will come soon enough; and when it does come, you will have no outlet. Some are willing to cut their lands up into small lots, and give every alternate lot to immi- grants, thinking it will more than dou- ble the price of the balance. What do you care what your lands are worth, if you have none to sell — besides, it would reduce the price of cotton more than one-half, and the land you have left would not pay per acre one-half of the dividends they do now — reducing your profits three-fourths. You have a plenty of native poor people to sell land to if you wish to part with any. Do those who have no land wish competitors in labor, and in the land market — reducing your wages one-half or more? Do you wish a great in- crease of money capital, reducing the rate of interest to the standard of Eu- rope, causing all property to rise in proportion to the fall of interest? Your wages are fixed by the surplus of cot- ton you have to export, and the price it will bring in Liverpool. Your pros- perity depends upon the scarcity of ^a- bor and a high rate of interest. You have nothing but your labor— you can- not borrow money, even if it gets down to two per cent. The value of your la- bor being fixed by the value of cotton in Liverpool, where interest is low, you can, by residing where it is high, ac- quire proportionally much more land in a given time. To those who have land to sell, or more than can be worked, let me say, the very scarcity of labor will make one-half of your lands bring in an- nually more money than if all was planted; the other half is worth five per cent, to grow broom-sedge for graz- ing, and will advance more than five per cent, annually. For the safety of the manufacturing interest, especially in cotton, it is not prudent to push it too fast — not faster than markets can be found for the products manufac- tured. Just a6 sure as the winds re- turn the water, to be condensed and fall again above the shoals, the people here will possess the money, and energy, and skill, to put the water to work; and to effect this most speedily, we want a scarcity of labor, that there may be a scarcity of cotton, and correspond- ingly good prices. With cotton at twenty to twenty- five cents per pound, we can in Georgia appropriate ten dollars towards increas- ing our manufacturing interest with more ease than one dollar, with double the labor, and cotton eight to twelvfe cents. Where are the laborers best fed and clothed? — where labor is scarce. Where does land pay the best profits? — where labor is scarce; and the reason is, the products of the farm bring the best prices under these cir- cumstances. I am equally opposed to begging for money to be brought to the South to be invested. If capitalists come of their own accord, let them come, but it is not to our interest that they should. You now own the property of Georgia; if you sell one-half of it, you will own but the other half. It is very difficult to transfer real property from one country to another. The most you would get would be the means to live and dress fine for a few years. What we want is a system of saving and properly investing each year. We could and ought to save annually fif- ON IMMIGRATION. 67 teen millions of dollars, to be invested in machinery. That would pay future dividends, to be reinvested: I am for more labor too; but I want such as we may never regret acquiring. Accumu- late all sorts of labor-saving machines; improve your land to a capacity double its present rates; improve your systems fully double of what they now are. Learn to do fully fifty per cent, more work with the same labor than is now done, and with more ease; learn to ap- ply your labor to greater advantage than is now done; do all this, and more too which can be done, and you will find your products ample, without any increase of population. I am for non- action by Georgia — non-action of our people. Leave the subject of immigra- tion to time and the free will of those who wish to come among us and be of us. We owe our prosperity at this time entirely to the scarcity of labor — many negroes having refused to work; others being employed in repairing torn-up railroads and building new roads. If all the negroes had gone to work on the farms, and done full work, it would have taken twenty years to reach our present situation. The scarcity of labor is the only bless- ing we now enjoy as a result of the war. The scarcity of labor in the South gives us the proceeds of the very la- bor some people wish to transfer here. The profits of one hand in the cotton field give us the labor of two in Eu- rope. Transfer him here, and he will compete with the labor we now have, or he will labor with those we now have, to lessen their profits, and bring about a state of things which will get up strikes. You must recollect, a strike in the cotton or harvest field is not like one in a cotton mill or on a railroad. If the mill stops, what has been done is not lost; if the hands re- fuse to move any more dirt, what has been, remains. Not so with wheat and cotton: all is lost, unless you con- tinue to advance. The guano must be pumped up into the cotton bolls, and they must be gathered by uninter- rupted labor. The press of the South has labored earnestly to get the cotton planter to make all his supplies at home, urging it as being the cheapest policy. Now every cotton planter knows that noth- ing pays as well as cotton, and all the presses in the world cannot change his opinion. But if the press will strike at the root of the evil, they may do incalculable good. I will state what it is; I have always practiced it; both the true interest of the cotton planter and patriotism should make all adopt it. Apply one-half of all la- bor and land to the making of full supplies of all kinds that are needed on the plantation, and enough to spare for those engaged in other pur- suits. Do this, and you will get more money (take ten years together) for the other half of labor and land en- gaged in cotton culture than if the whole was employed to produce cot- ton. If this is true, immigration is certainly not to our interest, and why should not the cotton planters consult their interest as well as other people. Verv respectfully,. DAVID DICKSOM. IMMIGRATION-NUMBER II. Spakxa, Georgia, October 7th, 1869. Editor Southern Cultivator: I could not finish what I had to say on immigration in my first article. I will not reply to any criticism on my views hereafter, as I have no interest to serve that is not common to every planter, to-wit: the prosperity of the South. I have never held any office, and do not wish to do so. I speak and write simply what I believe is the true interest of the cotton planter, without regard to pleasing or dis- pleasing. I will use round numbers; these will be near enough for all purposes. It has been about ninety years since the close of the Revolutionary War. The population then was estimated at about three millions; to this original number a few have been added since, by purchase of territory and annexa- tion, but not enough to alter the re- sults materially. During these nine- ty years, we have been engaged in wars (including the Indian wars) as much as one-sixth of the time, and what is the result? The population of the United States has increased 68 DICKSON'S SYSTEM OF FARMING. thirteen-fold, reaching now, probably, thirty-nine millions. Taking the nine- ty years together, there has been an increase of population equal to the original number, once in about evei-y seven years, including the limited im- migration. Who can want a greater in- crease of population than that? And as long as there is sufficient room to produce all the necessaries of life, the increase will keep up to these figures. Is there any one that wishes to en- courage a system that would stint the food of their own children so as to stop the natural increase of a well provided population? Taking thirty- nine millions as the number of per- sons in the United States at present, let us see what they will be in ninety years more, or in ,1959 (and" some who are children now will be alive then) : thirteen times thirty-nine millions makes five hundred and seven mil- lions of persons. Messrs. Editors, we will now try the figures in the case of Georgia, and what is true of Georgia is true of all the Cotton States. The population of Georgia is now about one million two hundred thousand; thirteen times that amount is fifteen millions six hundred thousand. Now, is there any- thing that will prevent the ratio of increase for the next ninety years be- ing equal to the past ninety years, but a scarcity of food, and clothing, and room? It is often said that the South is the garden spot of the world. Heretofore we had permanent and limited labor, and the cotton plant, to- gether with an extensive forest before us. All is changed now; the best of the forest is gone and it requires a greater number of acres in the South to support its people than in regions farther North. It is much more diffi- cult to retain the soil and improve it. Here the land is not frozen and covered with snow six months in the year; the summers are much hotter and longer; heat hastens exhaustion when under the plough; and the heavy rains damage the land the year round; therefore, we need more land that we may rotate the crops and give the soil rest. Labor is chiefly valuable, not on account of the aggregate of what it produces, but the money value af- ter paying for labor and all expenses. The amount of labor that will pro- duce the greatest net profit is what I want. I contend we now have it in the Cotton States. The laborer and his family have to be first fed and clothed, no matter what the price agreed on for labor, before capital gets anything. It is said we want more labor. Can we get more laborers without at the same time getting more consumers? Or is it meant we want more persons without capital? If so, I am opposed to that plan. I had rather have less labor, and have a majority of the peo- ple interested in property, morals, true religion, and everything that is desirable. A large population has a tendency to develop a central govern- ment and a standing army. I will leave it to some divine to say what ef- fect the introduction of Chinamen would have on religion, morals, etc. Had it not been for the clause pro- hibiting slavery, which Virginia put in the articles ceding the Northwest territory, and the immigration of Eu- ropeans, we would not have had the late war and its results; and even if the war had come, there would have been no "lost cause." Immigration is the chief cause of the changed char- acter of the Government of the Uni- ted States, and a continuances of the former will hasten the overthrow of the latter, with all its attendant con- sequences. Cotton planters! the whole capital of Europe, including money and ma- chinery, together with that of the North, is striving to increase the quantity of cotton, and to reduce the price. You have no concert of ac- tion; a panic increases your anxiety to sell cotton. This feeds the panic still more. Your only remedy is to make only what is wanted at paying prices; keep out of debt, be the credi- tors, make the most of your' supplies at home — then, and only then, will you have power. Messrs. Editors, there is a great deal said about the capital the immi- grants bring to this country. I do not think they bring any, except enough to exchange during the first year's residence for articles that would be exported during that year, if not consumed by the immigrants, such as bacon, cheese, corn, flour, lard, etc. ON IMMIGRATION. Q9 The gold returns to Europe, in place of the above articles, to pay for their clothing, etc. A country being rich is a very dif- ferent thing from a population being rich. Suppose Georgia had five hun- dred millions of taxable property, and one million of inhabitants, and you add two hundred millions taxable property and one million of popula- tion, the people would be poorer than at first. Population does not lessen taxes. Thirty years ago, with one- half of the present population, we did not pay more than one-tenth of the present tax. Under the Adams' ex- travagant administration, a tax of about two dollars and fifty cents per head, with a population of five millions, was paid. Under Mr. Johnson's admin- istration, with an average population of thirty-five millions, nearly five hun- dred millions were paid to the govern- ment, or sixteen dollars per head. Let each reader figure for himself and make up his mind accordingly. One of the benefits of scarcity of la- bor is, it gives high prices for cotton, and thereby gives us a monopoly of all commercial manures; and only one-half the land being required to produce the same amount of cotton; deeper ploughing can be done — this will hold moisture, to keep the manure soluble, and make the insoluble solu- ble. More care in cultivation follows; the best and most level lands will be selected; the worn and gullied lands will go into forest again to equalize the seasons as to cold and hot, wet and dry. The very scarcity of labor will enable planters to acquire a cash capital, and with that, if they are true, they can dictate terms. I feel no apprehension that the negro will or can force the planter to sell his land. I do not believe that the increase of price of grain in the great Northwest is due to the hundreds of thousands of immigrants annually settling there. If it was true, I would not want such immigrants; they could not make bread for their own consumption. It must be found in other causes, as de- preciation of the currency, conversion of grain into meat for cities, for ex- port, and the gradual impoverishment of land. I take issue again on the amount of labor that can be spared from a dense population, compared with a sparse one. European experience shows that only about one man out of each hun- dred of the population can be spared without creating a scarcity of the nec- essaries of life. The United States, taking both sections, furnish from six to eight to the hundred. If the South, previous to the war, had taken the na- tive white man and negro to build her railroads, instead of employing immigrants, cotton would have ad- vanced to such an extent as would have twice paid for the whole work, thus getting the roads for nothing, and still have enough to pay for all iron, etc. Georgia, for the last four years, has repaired and made more miles of new roads, built more facto- ries, shops, houses, etc., (all with Geor- gians), than any one million two hun- dred thousand people ever did since the creation of the world, and in this lies the secret of our success. I will only touch upon one more item, viz: low rate of interest. Dense population has a tendency to center property in a few hands — property in the hands of a few has a tendency to lower the interest, because the few da not consume the whole interest; if more generally diffused, all would be consumed. Low interest at home causes capital to seek investments where interest is high. For instance, Europe purchases bonds here that pay five to seven per cent, interest to be reinvested year after year, still mak- ing money center to the lowest point of interest, and rendering it more dif- ficult for those to live who have no money. This country, in less than ten years, will pay a tribute in inter- est to Europe of more than one hun- dred millions of dollars on bonds hav- ing been principally consumed in lux- uries. I am no apologist for the negro. I would be glad for him to feel the stimulating effects of immigration, if it could be done without injuring the white race. I shall now take final leave of this question, commending it to the calm and thoughtful consideration of the thousands of planters at the South who have as deep an interest in it as I have. My object has not been to ro DICKSON'S SYSTEM OF FARMING. provoke controversy, but to caution my fellow-countrymen against a pol- icy which, in my humble judgment, is fraught with ruin to the South. Yours truly, DAVID DICKSON. IMMIGRATION-NUMBER III. Si'ARTA, Georgia, March 31, 1870. Lr. J. Dickson Smith: Deai: Sik — You wish to have my further views on the policy of immi- gration to the Cotton States. I should have answered sooner; but every time 1 set apart a few hours for that pur- pose, I have been interrupted by com- pany. The great cry of the friends of im- migration is to develop the resources of the Cotton States. That might do if it did not increase the recipients as well as products. I entirely disagree with them. The people of the Cotton States own the soil, mines, water- power, etc., and I contend that we have the labor to develop these re- sources more effectually than if we had more, and receive all the profits. It is our first duty to provide for our own household, and take care of our own poor. We can do it more effec- tually, and with greater profits to our- selves, than we could with an increase of labor. Under our present sparse population, there is plenty of land and room for all, and abundant employ- ment for our children. This will not be the case when once our country be- comes flooded with immigrants. Our own children may even want that dai- ly employment necessary to earn them a scanty subsistence of being en- couraged and stimulated, as they now are, by all those incentives to action that spring from remunerative labor, as well as from the innumerable open- ings for enterprise now presenting themselves in our Southern States. One writer, who objects to my views, asks, "Who built the railroads of the South?" and answers, "Immigrant la- bor built them." That is too true; but it was a great evil and loss to the South. Under the old system, we had too much labor. It reduced what we had to export to too low a figure. Su- gar five to eight cents, cotton seven to ten cents! Instead of building our railroads with immigrant labor, we should have done it with our slaves, to the extent of one-fourth of all la- bor employed in producing cotton, rice, sugar, and tobacco. Who will say that if one-fourth of the labor had been employed in building railroads, factory dams, fish dams, ditching, im- proving homesteads, planting or- chards, etc., we would not have made fifty per cent, more clear money than we did with all the labor? The fifty per cent, clear money would have pur- chased all the railroad iron, cotton machinery,' etc. Under that system, we might have spun and woven one- half of the cotton, and had as many roads as we wanted — all of which would have been clear profit, getting as much money, all the time, for three- fourths of the cotton as we would for the whole. These are no new ideas of mine. They were formed and ex- pressed early in my cotton career. The first full cotton crop that I ever made (1847), I held my cotton eleven months, and sold the entire crop at four and a half cents per pound. Now, if not more than one-fourth a general crop had been made that year, or three-fourths had been burned after it had been made, the balance would, in all probability, have brought ten to fifteen cents. Would it not have been better to have taken cotton hands in- stead of immigrants to build those railroads, and saved the money, by in- crease of prices, to pay them, instead of paying the immigrants out of low- priced cotton? When you get immigrants, you get competitors for the labor we have, as well as their own labor. In a former article on this subject, I showed that a sparse population could be governed more cheaply than a dense population; that there were less forgeries, less robberies, and less of all the vices of the day. If you get immigrants, you get all the isms known in the world. If you wish a standing army, encourage immigration. All dense populations require a stand- ing army to preserve peace and to pro- tect life and liberty. Public liberty is near enough gone now; but a dense population would preclude all possibili- ty of its ever returning. Reflect on ON IMMIGRATION. history and the present population of the world. Look to China, for in- stance. If people can live cheaper and better in a dense population, why do they leave a dense population and their homes to go thousands of miles to find a sparse population? It is be- cause plenty of land and room insures plenty of all that is needed. I see it stated, since the war with the American Colonies, that England has lost, by emigration, six million five hundred thousand persons; yet she has, to-day, more than four times the agricultural products that she had then. The loss of the surplus popula- tion gave the balance room to work and accumulate. How was this done? By improving the soil with manures: doubling it by going down twice as deep; making it produce four times as much; putting one portion of the sav- ings in improved implements of farm- ing, and another portion in manufac- turing. Now, this is the kind of la- bor I want. It produces dividends, and the owners get them. Two tons of good guano will pro- duce more cotton than an immigrant would, even if he belonged to you, like the guano. Both pay in their own cost. This is the only evil in guano: likely to cause an over production; but in the case of guano, you only have to cease buying it. You haven't it to take care of. The immigrant you must work and feed. In the case of ma- chinery you must work and feed. In the case of machinery, all you have to do is to cease to apply the water and steam until the surplus is consumed. Give me guano and machinery for ever, instead of immigrants. I con- tend we can get more of both without immigrants than with them Cotton from twenty to twenty-five cents per pound leaves a large amount each year, to invest in machinery and guano, if we will. Immigrants, and cotton at eight to twelve cents, will leave nothing. Since the war. I have paid about ten cents per pound for la- bor alone to produce cotton. Say cotton has averaged twenty-four cents; one- third is eight cents, and the use of houses, wood, teams, etc., are equiva- lent to two cents more — making ten cents per pound. Some give more. It makes no difference what terms you agree upon with labor, you have to feed and clothe the laborer and his family. Suppose you had double the number of laborers, and you employ them at the lowest wages, feed and clothe ihem and their families, and sell your cotton crop at ante-war prices, where would be your profits? Again, scarcity of labor and high prices for cotton give us a monopoly of the guano market. Guano, applied to crops, at the rate of from eight to twelve dollars per acre, will more than double the crops — producing more than the labor, land, stock and machinery, and the cost of the guano not much above the loss in machinery, mule feed and tools, to say nothing about the expenses of the labor. Then, think of the difference! By doub- ling the number of laborers, without guano, you would exhaust and ruin the soil. Guano, to produce the same amount, will improve the soil in more ways than one. Whoever uses guano will break his land deeper and pre- pare it more thoroughly. As I claim to be the first who intro- duced guano in the Cotton States, I will caution you against over-produc- tion of cotton. Use guano and leave off immigrants! Produce about two million five hundred thousand bales only, till priQes above twenty cents per pound stimulate a farther in- crease. Prepare for a panic by con- stant investments in stock, securities and machinery, even if not more than one hundred dollars annually. It will be a beginning. Keep at least six months' cash on hand for necessaries, that you may not have to force cotton sales. Should a cotton panic occur now, or after this, it would produce, in many cases, starvation. Make all your supplies, and the balance of your labor in cotton will bring more mon- ey than ail would. Every man be- lieves this, yet some say. "give us im- migrants." If you want to change a wrong principle permanently, strike at the evil in truth. All the writers say, "make your supplies at home, and thereby keep your money at home." I must admit, I cannot see it in that light. IIow can money be kept at home, and what good would it do if kept there? Money is only valuable as the cheapest and most convenient medium of exchange. These are my 72 DICKSON'S SYSTEM OF FARMING. views. The cotton plailt is a great power for good, and a rich legacy for us. How to mal