JK 516 .B7 Copy 1 THE INTER?^ATIO>^AL LAW AND ORDER LEAGUE "THE EXECUTIVE POWER AND THE ENFORCE- MENT OF THE LAWS," 0^1.1- ADDRESS OF / PRESIDENT CHARLES CARROLL BONNEY, n PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA, NOV, 21, 1890. 6\ c^ <>. \ V5 THE EXECUTIVE POWER. CONTENTS. I. Introductory, - - - - 1 II. Executive Power in tlie Mother Country, 5 III. Executive Powei' of the American Union, (> IV. Executive Power of the American States, 7 Y. Executive Power of Cities, - - 8 VI. Executive Power of Countries, - - 10 VII. Nature of the Executive Power, - 12 VIII. Application of the Principles Considered, 14 TFIR EXECUTIVE POWER BXI^ORCnMBNT OK THB BAWS. Friends of Laio and Order: The foundation principle of constitutional government is the truth that there are certain transcendent rules that even rulers should obey ; certain supreme laws to which even the highest official dignitaries owe a paramount allegiance ; and without the sanction of which they would not be entitled to hold and exercise the powers of their positions. This is true alike in monarchy and in republic, for no man can be King or President, except in conformity to some fundamental law, which is the source and measure of his right. There ma}', indeed, be a usurper of power, ruling by force, in defiance of. law, but not a lawful ruler without the condition stated. Government consists, essentially, in making and enforcing rules of public or private conduct, and in expounding and apply- ing those rules in cases of controversy. Hence, government is naturally divided into the three great departments of legislative, executive and judicial power. In the gradual evolution and development of civil government. THE EXECUTIVE FOWER. 2 it has been found that the duties of those departments differ so materially in their nature and circumstances, as to require different qualifications for proper fulfillment; and that satisfac- tory results can be obtained only by providing separate and rela- tively independent officers for each department, with suitable connecting links between them. To allow a person, or several persons who have made a rule for future conduct, to determine, after it shall have become a subject of controversy, its construction, scope and force, and apply it accordingly ; or to permit an executive officer, conclu- sively to decide for himself upon the validity, propriety and effect of such a law, and regulate its enforcement accordingly, would be to permit arbitrary and despotic power to assert its sway, no matter what ma}^ be the form of the government. If the Legislature enact a law, or an executive officer issue an order, or perform an official act, obviously the validity of the law, order or act should be referred in any proper case, to a disinterested and impartial tribunal for proper examination and decision. In America the constitution of government has assumed the most definite form; and the great departments of power the highe'st relative importance and independence. Here the great trinity of government is most conspicuously revealed. Legisla- ture, executive and judiciary stand forth, each with its distinct identity and characteristics, yet are all united in the grand body politic of the government, and work harmoniously together like the vital organs of the human body. If we observe, attentively, the course of the various govern- mental operations, we shall soon discover that while all the work is imperfect, as everything human must be, the best is done b}^ the judiciary, the most defective by the legislative, and the most inefficient and inadequate by the executive department of power, alike in nation, province, state and municipality. It is true that in the proceedings of the courts there is still undue delay, uncertainty and expense which should be remedied, but in most cases substantial justice seems, finally, to be fairly well attained, and the obligation to secure it is universalh' acknowledged, while higher rules of personal and official conduct are declared and enforced than those which prevail in any other department of the government. Violations of duty are every- Ik TITE EXtXUTIVE POWER. 3 where earnestly condemned, and, as a general rule, severely punished. Legislative work is notoriously poor. In quantity it is exces- sive, burdening the statute books with worse than needless details of mere administration ; in quality it is crude and uncer- tain, requiring years of litigation to determine its real meaning and effect: in motive too often partial and sectional, instigated by some merely local interest or grievance, and not properly limited to kindred cases. But it is in the executive department of power that the greatest surprises await us. We see, as we survey the country, executive positions high as the thrones of kings, and richly endowed with regal powers, occupied by commanders-in-chief who do not command; governors who do not govern; executives who do not execute. We see those exalted public officers largely occupied with the affairs of the political party to which they respectively belong; and, when not so engaged, appearing more like the chairmen of important committees, than as the custo- dians and administrators of great powers of government. It has taken a century to evolve and develop the meaning and scope of the national power to "regulate commerce among the several states," and after the lapse of that century there seems to be no adequate comprehension, in the general public mind, of the ^real nature, extent and office of the executive power, as vested under the American system of free government. The consequences of the almost universal neglect to under- stand and exercise the executive power of cities, states and nation, have been and are most deplorable. Dangerous classes and interests boldly intrude into the fields of active life, and audaciously contend with legitimate business and with lawful authority for possession and control. Innocence and justice walk in dread of contact with disorder and vice, even in the highways of the people. The law-abiding do not feel that the strong hand of power is always r^ady to uphold and protect them, and repel assault. The '-peace and good order of society" seem to be preserved almost as much by the forbearance of wrong, as by the power of right. False ideas of government infest the public mind, and it seems to be a common notion that any person may, at pleasure, dispute any public authority, and that the only recourse, in such a case, is a law suit, more or less protracted, in which the wron^ I THE EXECUTIVE POWER. 4 doer will have a chance of success, through some technical defect, either in the circumstances of the case or the details of the pro- ceeding. Let us, therefore, briefly consider the Nature and Duties of the Executive Power, with the purpose of promoting, as far as may be practicable, its larger and more efficient exercise for the protection of the people, and the institutions which characterize our civilization. For the purposes of this inquiry we do not need to examine all the constitutions and laws that affect the various localities to which the Law and Order movement extends; but it will be sufficient to take convenient examples to illustrate the principles involved, and the mode of their application. American institu- tions are so largely an inheritance, that we natural^ turn, at the outset, to the ancestral land for information of their origin and fundamental character. The essential principles of executive administration are sub- stantially the same in all enlightened countries, however the details of their organization and application may vary in different localities. The Executive is defined by the great American lexicogra- pher, Noah Webster, as ''the officer, whether king, president, or other chief.magistrate, who superintends the execution of the laws; the person or persons who administer the government; the executive power or authority in government. " For the proper understanding and interpretation of this power, recourse must be had to the jurisprudence of its origin; for it is an established rule that terms introduced into a law must be understood ia the •sense which they bore when first so used; and that when imported from another jurisdiction they bring with them the construction which they there received, although it may be enlarged from time to time, according to a maxim of the common law, to embrace new cases within the principle involved, as they arise in the progress of human affairs. We must therefore turn, in the present case, to the law of Great Britain for light on the origin, nature and scope of the Executive Power. What it was in that country when our gov- ernment was established, it continues to be here, except as changed by our constitutions and laws to adapt it to the differ- ent conditions and circumstances of our people. i THE EXECUTIVE POWER. 5 II. THE EXECUTIVE POWER IN THE MOTHER COUNTRY. In his luminous and authoritative "Commentaries on the Laws of England," the first publication of which was completed in 1769, Sir William Blackstone, the most distinguished expounder of the English system of law and government, speaks as follows of the power under consideration. The Supreme Executive Power is vested in a single person, the king or queen. This executive power of the English nation is so vested by the general consent of the people, for the care and protection of the communit}^, in subservience to the law of the land, in return for which the allegiance of ever}^ individual is due. Bl. Com. Bk. I. Ch. Ill, pp. 189, 190. It is a maxim in the law that protection and subjection are reciprocal. * ^ * Xhe principal duty of the king is, to gov- ern the people according to law. ={= * * The king ought not to be subject to man, but to God and the law, for the law maketh the king. Let the king therefore render to the law, what the law hath invested in him, with regard to others, dominion and power, for he is not truly king, where will and pleasure rules, and not the law. "^ '^~ * The Laws of England are the birth- right of the people thereof, and all the kings and queens who shall ascend the throne of this realm, ought to administer the government of the same, according to said laws. The coronation oath binds the sovereign so to govern, and to the extent of his power to cause law and justice, in mercy to be executed. Ibd., Ch. VI, pp. 233, 236. The limitation of the regal authority was a first and essential principle in all the Gothic systems of government established in Europe. In this connection, Judge Blackstone speaks in eloquent terms of "those inherent though latent powers of societ}', which no climate, no time, no constitution, no contract can ever destroy or diminish," thus anticipating the majestic proclan a- tion of the inalienable rights of man, made a few years later,, in the declaration of American independence. Ibd., C]:i- W\, pp. 238, 245. Civil liberty, rightly understood, consists in protecting the rights of individuals by the united force of societ}'. Ibd.. 251. 7VIE EXECUTIVE POWER. 6 The king is considered as the generahssimo, or the first in mihtary command, within the kingdom. The great end of society is to protect the weakness of individuals, by the united strength of the communit}^; and the principal use of government is to direct that united strength in the best and most effectual manner to answer the end proposed. Ibd., 262. The king is also the general conservator of the peace of the kingdom. Ibd., 266. The Proclamations of the king have a binding force, when they are grounded upon and enforce the laws of the realm. •^ ^ ^ Such proclamations must not contradict the old laws, nor tend to establish new ones, but only to enforce the » «, ... I B execution of such laws as are already in being, in such manner ^ as the king shall judge necessary. Ibd., 270. The sheriff is an officer of very great antiquity * * '^ and does all the king's business in the countr}^ * ^ :K p^^ 2,Q.X.?> in a four-fold capacity, namely, as a judge in certain primary matters; as the keeper of the king's peace; in a ministerial capacity, as an officer of the courts of justice; and as the king's bailiff, in matters of property and revenue. Ibd., IX, 343, 344. Of the powers and duties of this officer, more will be said, under the title of his office, in a subsequent part of this discourse. Let us now turn to the new world, and note how the regal principle of government has been established here. For in some form it is essential to ever}^ effective organization of human society. III. THE EXECUTIVE POWER OF THE UNITED STATES. The Constitution of the American Union declares that "the Executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America." He is required to take an oath or affirma- tion that he will faithfully execute his office; and will, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect and defend the constitution. He is made commander-in-chief of the army and navy, and of the militia of the several states, when called into the service of the United States. The power to grant reprieves and pardons is also vested in him; and with the consent of the Senate it is his right THE EXECUTIVE POWER. 7 and duty to make treaties, and to appoint ambassadors, other public ministers, consuls, judges of the Supreme Court, and other public officers. The constitution also commands that he shall, from time to time, give to the Congress information of the state of the Union, and recommend to their consideration such measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; and that '