•^ \^^W.* .^"^ ^^ m:^ -^(^ ■'/: 'r 'cP\^ C v^ ,^A'^..■?.^•- '%. ..^ ^^^*^.?;,^ "^^ .^ . ,' if \ v> ':0i/)>h^ ■^ ■ cP\- r. 'ft*. .-^i ■■•..%"-'cP*--;-;'.%"*'><^ c.'^ ^ .iracles.; therefore the Jewish religion of old, and the Christian now, both which appeal to miracles, as their first and chief foundation, are no better grounded than Paganism. But even in the instan- ces which the Doctor alleges (and we may be sure he has picked out suoh as he thought most for his purpose) it is easy to take notice that the miracles pretended to by the Pagans had no probable grounds to support them, no number of witnesses to attest them, no contemporary writers to vouch for them, but, as in the case of the victory supposed to have been gained over the Latins by the assistance of PREFACE. 19 Castor and Pollux, all was built upon a popular opinion, or the testimony of one or two that pre- tended to have seen those deities; which was greed- ily swallowed by the general and the senate as a token of the divine favour, who thereupon erected Ji temple to thjem. Whereas, in the case which ^the Doctor supposes to be parallel to this, of the victories gained against the infidels in tlfe holy wars, by the assistance of the martyrs, these saints, as appears by what he has in the margin, were seen bv both the Christian and infidel armv: and the history of it was written, as we learn from the Doctor himself, by an eye-witness. But whether the miracles which he has pitche(^ upon for the subject of his ridicule be true or false, there is nothing at least heathenish in them, and consequently nothing that can be of any service to him to make out the exact conformity, which he pretends to demonstrate, between Popery and Pa- ganism. In the mean time, the Doctor is not igno- rant, that it is not upon such things, as most of those are which he alleges, that we lay any stress, neither have we any need to appeal to them; for God has been pleased in every age to work far more evident miracles in his Church, by the minis- try of his saints; in raising the dead to life, in cu- ring the blind and the lame, in casting out devils, in healing in a moment inveterate diseases, and the like stupendous works of his power, attested by the most authentic monuments, and very frequent- ly (as may be seen in the acts of the canonizations of the saints) by the depositions of innumerable eye-witnesses, examined upon oath; and by the pub- lic notoriety of the facts; which kind of miracles, so authentically attested, will be to all ages a 20 PREFACE. standing evidence, that the Church, in whose com- munion they have all been wrought, is not that idolatrous Pagan Church which the Doctor pre- tends, but the true Spouse of Christ, which alone has inherited in all ages that promise which the Lord made at his departure, St. John xiv. 12, 13. 'Veril}^, verily, I say unto you, he that believeth in me, the works that I do shall he do also, and greater works than these shall he do, because I go unto my Father. And whatsoever ye shall ask in my name that will I do.' And here I might take my leave of the Doctor, for what he adds, p. i^B, &c. to derive the Church sanctuaries from the asylum opened by Romulus to receive fugitives, the authority of the Pope from the Pagan Pontiff, and the religious orders from the colleges of the Augurs, Falii, &c. is so very weak, that it would be trifling away my time to take any notice of it. But, before we part, I must put the Doctor and his friends in mind that some people will naturally infer, from what he imagines he has so fully proved, viz. that Popery and Pa- ganism stand upon the same bottom, and that one is no better than the other; they will infer, I say, that the orders which his Church pretends to have by succession from the Church of Eome are no more valid than if they proceeded from an Indian Brahman or a Mahometan Dervise. (Chandler's Sermons, p. 36.) And by the self-same way of arguing, by which he pretends to demonstrate an exact conformity between the religion of the pre- sent Romans and that of their heathen ancestors these same gentlemen will, with a much fairei show of probability, prove an exact conformity between the religion by law established and Po- PREFACE. 21 pr,ry. The consequence of which will be, if the Doctor be not mistaken in his parallel, that Eng- lish Protestancy is no better than heathenish idolatry. But that I may not seem to say this without rea- son, let us suppose that Chandler, or some other of the same kidney, should take into his head to charge the Church by law established with Popery: and to this purpose should heap together all that he could of ceremonies, observances, 6zc. which Protestants have retained from the old religion, and in . one of his learned declamations deliver himself as follows to his dissenting auditory: "Beware, my dearly beloved, of these people that call themselves the Church of England: for their religion is wholly derived from that of their Romish ancestors, and has an exact conformity or uniformity rather with Popery, and consequently with Paganism, from which, as Dr. Middleton has lately demonstrated, the Papists have borrowed their v;hole religion. Now mark ye, my beloved, how plainly 1 shall prove that these people who call themselves Protestants have taken their whole religion from the Papists. " First, their Churches are the very same which were originally built by their Popish ancestors, and are still dedicated to the same Popish saints, as formerly they were; though one of their own divines plainly tells them, they had better have dedicated them to Bacchus or Venus. Now of all the honours that the Papists have ever given to their saints, this of dedicating temples to them was Xiertainly the greatest, far greater than that of kissing their relics or desiring their prayers, and consequently if the Church of Rome were ever 22 PREFACE. guilty of idolatry in relation to the saints, her daughter the Church of England stands guilty of the same, which has ten Churches dedicated to Mary for one dedicated to Christ. ^'Secondly, in their Churches they have altars too like the Papists; and what should altars do there, if they did not offer sacrifice like the Pa- pists? To these altars they cringe and bow; whicl^ is giving religious honour, which God has appro- priated to himself, to insensible creatures, and there- fore is no better than downright idolatry. In many places they have over these altars images and pic- tures, like the Papists, in spite of the second Com- mandment. And though they are pleased to tell us that they worship them not, yet what can we think when we see them perpetually bowing down to that which indeed is no more than an image, viz. the name of Jesus, which of all images of Christ has the least of solid substance in it, as be- ing only formed in the air by the empty sound of the two syllables of his name. But what respect they have for images we may judge by that which they show to the cross, which they have lately erected in the highest place of the capital city of the kingdom; and so much are they bewitched with the notion of this standard of Popery, that they look upon none rightly baptized without be- ing signed with the sign of the cross. "Thirdly, their liturgy or common prayer is wholly Popish, and at the best but a bungling imi- tation of the Romish Mass: from this they have borrowed their collects, lessons, &c. and a great part of what they call their communion service. Their orders of bishops, priests and deacons, both as to the name and thing, were taken from Rome; PREFACE. 23 and from thence they all pretend to derive their succession. Their way of ordaining ministers re- sembles that of the Papists; and is equally blasphe- mous in their bishops pretending to give the Holy Ghost, with the power of forgiving and retaining sins. Their surplices are but the rags of the whore of Babylon. Their organs and music in their Churches, their singing boys, their Anthems and Te Deums are all Popish inventions. "Fourthly, their Church government by arch- bishops and bishops, their spiritual courts, their dignities of deans, archdeacons, prebendaries, &;c. are all visibly derived from the Papists,* and like the Papists, their bishops pretend to give confirma- tion; in which they are the less excusable, because in their very articles of religion, art. 25, they de- clare that confirmation comes of a corrupt follow- ing of the Apostles. The same thing they declare with regard to the Popish sacrament of penance or priestly absolution, and yet have retained it in their order for the visitation of the sick; where they prescribe auricular confession and a form of absolution, th3 same in substance as that used in the Church of Rome. " Fifthly, like the Papists they pay an idolatrous worship to the elements of bread and wine, to which they kneel at the time of communion: and their declaring (contrary to the express words of their Catechism) that they do not believe the body and blood of Christ to be there, does but aggravate their guilt beyond that of the Papists, because these believe that in the sacrament they worship Christ, whereas our pretended Protestants believe they have nothing there but bread and wine. " Sixthly, they observe days like the Papists in 24 PREFACE, honour of the saints and angels; which if it be no religious worship, I know not what is. They pray to be defended by the angels in their collect for Michaelmas-day, which is rank Popery. Their calendar is full of Popish saints. They prescribe fasts and abstinence like the Papists; and from them have taken into their books, the fasts of Lent, Vigils, Ember-days and Fridays: though to give them their due, this part of Popery, for a long time, has been found no where but in their books. **In fine, their godfathers and godmothers m baptism, their churching of women after child- bearing, their whole order of matrimony, their consecration of churches, their anointing of kings, and such like observances, are no better than Po- pery; and, in a word, the whole, face of their re- ligion, both in town and country, is an exact re- semblance of that of their Popish forefathers. And consequently, since Popery and Paganism stand upon a level, I cannot but conclude, that English Protestancy is nearly allied to Paganism. For whilst we see these pretended Protestants worship- ing at this day in the same temples, at the same altars, sometimes before the same images, and al- ways with the same liturgy, and many of the same ceremonies, as the Papists did, they must have more charity, as well as skill in distinguishing, than I pretend to, who can absolve them from the same crime of superstition and idolatry with their Popish ancestors." Dr. Middleton, p. 70, 71. So far the Nonconformist agreeably to the cop} which the Doctor has set him in his parallel be tween Popery and Paganism. Now this kind of rhetoric, I am persuaded, whatever effect it migh. PREFACE. 25 have with regard to Dissenters, would excite no other motions in the minds of Church Protestants than those of indignation or contempt: and the same would be their dispositions with regard to Dr. Middleton's performance, if they would make use of the same weights and measures in our case as in their own. I shall add no more, but that I cannot but appre- hend that the Doctor, in pretending to impeach us of Paganism, has impugned the known truth: a truth so evident, that notwithstanding the violent humour of Luther, and all his bitter declarations against us, yet he could not help acknowledging, in his book against the Anabaptists, "That under the Papacy are many good Christian things, yea, all that is good in Christianity; and that Protes- tants had it from thence. — I say, moreover, says he, that under the Papacy is true Christianity, even the very Icernel of Christianity." So far the father and apostle of the Reformation, who whilst he is forced to grant that we have the very kernel of Christianity, 1 fear has kept nothing for himself but the shell. If the Doctor in quality of one of his children, has inherited any part of his trea- sure, I do not envy him the inheritance, but shall ieave him in the quiet possession of it. 8 tHE CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED m THE SACRAMENTS, SACRIFICE, CEREMONIES, AND OBSERVANCES OF THE CHURCH CHAPTER I OF THE SIGN OF THE CROSS. Q. Why do you treat of the sign of the cross, before you begin to speak of the sacrament? A, Because this holy sign is made use of in all the sacraments, to give us to understand, that they all have their whole force and efficacy from the cross, that is, from the death and passion of Jesus Christ. What is the sign of Christ, says St. Au- gustin,* which all know, but the cross of Christ;- which sign if it be not applied to the foreheads of the believers, to the water with which they are baptized, to the chrism, with which they are anoint- ed, to the sacrifice with which they are fed, none of these things is duly performed. Q. But did the primitive Christians only make use of the sign of the cross in the administration of the sacraments? * Tract 119 in Joan. 27 28 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. A, Not only then, but also upon all other occasions at every step, says the ancient and learned Tertul- lian,* at every coming in and going out, when wo put on our clothes or shoes, when we wash, when wa sit down to table, when we light a candle, when wo go to bed — whatsoever conversation employs us, wo mprint on our foreheads the sign of the cross. Q. What is the meaning of this frequent use of the sign of the cross? A. It is to show that we are not ashamed of the cross of Christ; it is to make an open profession of our believing in a crucified God; it is to help us to bear always in mind his death and passion; and to nourish thereby in our souls the three divine vir- tues of Faith, Hope and Charity. Q. How are these three divine virtues exercised in the frequent use of the cross? A. First, faith is exercised, because, the sign of the cross brings to our remembrance the chief ar- ticle of the Christian belief, viz. The Son of God dying for us upon the cross. Secondly, our hopo is thereby daily nourished and increased; because this holy sign continually reminds us of the passion of Christ, on which is grounded all our hope for mercy, grace and salvation. Thirdly, charity, or the love of God is excited in us by that sacred sign; by representing to us the love which God has showed us in dying upon the cross for us. Q. In what manner do you make the sign of tho cross? A. In blessing ourselves, we form the sign of the cross by putting our right hand to the fore- head, and so drawing as it were, a line down to tho breast or stomach, and then another line crossing * L. dc Corena Milit. c. 3. CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 29 the former from the left shoulder to the right: and the words that we pronounce at the same time are these, Mn the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost;' by which we make a solemn profession of our faith in the blessed Trinity. But in blessing other persons or things we form the cross in the air with the right hand extended to- wards the thing we bless. Q. Have you any thing more to add in favour of the cross, and the use of signing ourselves with the sign of the cross? A, Yes, the cross is the standard of Christ, and is called by cur Lord himself, St. Matt. xxiv. 30. the sign of the Son of Man. It is the badge of all good Christians, represented by the letter Tau,* ordered to be set as a mark upon the forehead of those that were to escape the wrath of God, Eze- kiel ix. 4. It was given by our Lord to Constan- tino, the first Christian emperor, as a token and assurance of victory; when he and his whole army in their march against the tyrant Maxentius saw a cross formed of pure light, above the sun with this inscription, 'By this conquer;' which account the historian Eusebius, in his first book of the life of Constantino, declares he had from that emperor's own mouth. To which we may add that the sign of the cross was used of old by the holy fathers, as an invincible buckler against the devil, and a powerful means to dissipate his illusions; and that God has often made it an instrument in their hands of great and illustrious miracles, of which there are innumerable instances in ancient church his- tory, and in the writings of the fathers, which it would be too tedious here to recount. * St. Hierom upon Ezek. ix. 3* 30 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. CHAPTER II. OF THE SACRAMENT OF BAPTISM. Q. What do you mean by a Sacrament ? A, An outward sign or ceremony of Christ's instituliorj, by which grace is given to the soul of the worthy receiver. Q. What are the necessary conditions for a thing to be a Sacrament? A. These three. First, it must be a sacred sign, and consequently, as to the outward performance, it must be visible or sensible. Secondly, this sa- cred sign must have annexed unto it a power of communicating grace to the soul. Thirdly, this must be .by virtue of the ordinance or institution of Christ. Q. How then do you prove that baptism is a sacrament, since the scripture nowhere calls it so? A, Because it has these three conditions. First, it is an outward visible sign, consisting in the wash- ing with water, with the form of words prescribed by Christ. Secondly, it has a power of communi- cating grace to our souls, in the way of a new birth; whence it is called by the Apostle, Tit. iii. 6. *The laver or washing of regeneration and renew- ing of the Holy Ghost.' Thirdly, we have the ordinance and institution of Christ, St. Matt, xxviii. 19. ^Go teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost.' And St. John iii. 5. 'Except a man be born again of water and the Holy Ghost, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God. Q. In what manner must baptism be administer ed, so as to be valid? A. It must be administered in true natural wa CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 31 ter, with this or the like form of words. ' I bap- tize thee in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost;' which words ought to be pronounced at the same time as the water is applied to the person that is baptized, and by the same minister, who ought to have the intention of doing what the Church does. Q. What if these words ' I baptize thee,' or any one of the names of the Three Persons, should be left out? A, In that case it would be no baptism. Q, What if the baptism should be administered in rose-water, or any of the like artificial waters? A. It would be no baptism. Q. Ought baptism to be administered by dip- ping, or by pouring of the water; or by sprinkling of the water? A, It may be administered validly any of these ways; but the custom of the Church is to adminis- ter this sacrament either by dipping in the water, which is used in the East; or by pouring of the water upon the person baptized, which is more customary in these parts of Christendom. More- over, it is the custom in all parts of the Catholic Church, and has been so from the Apostles' days, to dip or pour three times at the names of the three divine persons; though we do not look upon *his so essential, that the doing otherwise would r3nder the baptism invalid. Q, What think you of those that administer baptism so slightly, that it is doubtful whether it may in any sense be called an ablution or washing; aa for instance, those that administer it only with a fillip of a wet finger? A, Such as these expose themselves to the dan- ger of administering no baptism. ^^tttm^itk^^^aitgitmi^MM 32 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. Q. What do you think of baptism administered by heretics, or schismatics? A.' The Church receives their baptism, if they observe the Catholic matter and form; that is, if they baptize with true natural water, and have the intention of doing what the Church does; pro- nouncing at the same time these words, 'I baptize thee in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost.' Q. What think you of baptism administered with the due form of words, but without the sign of the cross? A, The omission of this ceremony does not ren- der the baptism invalid. Q. What is your judgment of the baptism said to be administered by some modern Arians, 'In the name of the Father, through the Son, in the Holy Ghost?' A. Such a corruption of the form makes the baptism null and invalid. Q. What is the doctrine of the Church as to baptism administered by a layman or by a woman? A. If it be attempted without necessity, it is a criminal presumption; though even then the bap- tism is valid, and is not to be reiterated: but, in a case of necessity, when a priest cannot be had, and a child is in immediate danger of death, baptism may not only validly, but also lawfully be adminis- tered by any person whatsoever. In which case a cleric, though only in lesser orders, is to be admit- ted preferably to a layman, and a man preferably to a woman, and a Catholic preferably to a heretic.; Q. How do you prove that infants may be bap4 tized who are not capable of being taught or in- structed in the faith? A, I prove it, first, by a tradition which the CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED 33 Church has received from the Apostles,* and prac- tised in all ages ever since; now as none were more likely or better qualified than the Apostles, to understand the true nneaning of the commission given them by their master to baptize all nations, so none were more diligent than they to execute faithfully this commission according to his mean- ing, and to teach their disciples to do the same, St. Matt, xxviii. 20. So that what the Church has received by tradition from the Apostles and their disciples, was undoubtedly agreeable to the com- mission of Christ. Secondly, I prove it by comparing together two texts of scripture, one of which declares, that with- out baptism no one can enter into the kingdom of heaven; St. John iii. 6. 'Except a man be born again of water and the Holy Ghost, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.' The other text declares, that infants are capable of this kingdom, St. Luke xviii. 16. 'Suffer little children to come to me, and forbid them not; for of such is the king- dom of God :' and consequently they must be capa- ble of baptism. Thirdly, circumcision in the old law correspond- ed to baptism in the new law, and was a figure of it, Colos. ii. 11, 12. But circumcision was admin- istered to infants, Gen. xvii. Therefore baptism in like manner is to be administered to infants. Fourthly, we read in scripture of whole families baptized by St. Paul, Acts xvi. 15. and 33. 1 Cor. i. 16. Now it is probable that in so many whole families there were some infants. * St. Irenacue, I. 2. c. 39. Origen, 1. 5. in c. 6. ad Rom. St. Cyprian, Ep. ad Fidum. St. Chrysostom, Horn, ad Ncu- phytea. St. Augustine, l. 10. de G^n. c. 23. &c. rittii 84 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. Fifthly, as infants are not capable of helping themselves by faith and repentance, were they not capable of being helped by the sacrament of bap- tism, they could have no share in Christ, and no means to be delivered from original sin; and con- sequently almost one half of mankind dying before the use of reason must inevitably perish, if infants were not to be baptized. « Sixthly, if infants' baptism were invalid, the gates of hell would have long since prevailed against the Church; yea, for many ages there would have been no such thing as Christians upon earth; since for many ages before the Anabaptists arose, all persons had been baptized in their infancy, which baptism if it were null, they were no Christians, and con- sequently there was no church. Where then was that promise of Christ, St. Matt. xvi. 19. "Upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.' And St. Matt, xxviii. 20. *Lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the world.' Besides, if infants' baptism be null, the first preachers of the Anabaptists had never received baptism, or had received it from those who never had been baptized. A likely set of men for bring- ing back God's truth banished from the world, who had not so much as received the first badge or character of a Christian; and who, so far from having orders or mission, had not so much as been baptized. Q. How do you prove against the Quakers that all persons ought to be baptized? A. From the commission of Christ, St. Matt. xxviii. 19. 'Go teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost.' From that general sentence of our k CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 35 Lord, St. John iii. 5. ^Except a man be born again of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.' From the practice of the Apos- tles, and of the first Christians, who were all bap- tized: thus we read. Acts ii. 38. with relation to the converts to Christianity at Jerusalem, when they asked of the Apostles, what they should do? that Peter said unto them, * Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ.' And ver. 41. *Then they that gladly received his word were baptized,&c.' Thus we read of the Samaritans converted by Philip, Acts viii. 12, 13. that 'They were baptized both men and women: and that Simon (Magus) himself also believed and was baptized;' as was also the eunuch of Queen Candace, ver. 36. 38. Thus we find Paul baptized by Ananias, Acts ix. 18. Cornelius and his friends by order of St. Peter, Acts x. 47, 48. Lydia and her household, by St. Paul, Acts xvi. 15, &c. In fine, from the perpetual belief and practice of the whole Church ever since the Apostles' days, which in all ages and all nations has ever administered baptism in water to all her child ren, and never looked upon any to be Christians until they were baptized. Now 'if a person will not hear the Church, let him be to thee as a heathen and a publican,' St. Matt, xviii. 17. Q. How do you prove from scripture that the Apostles gave baptism in water? A, From Acts viii. 36. 38. *See here is water,' said the eunuch to St. Philip, 'what does hinder me Ao be baptized? .... and they both went down into the water, both Philip and the eunuch, and he bap- tized him.' And Acts x. 47, 48. 'Can any man forbid water, said St. Peter, that those should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost 86 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. as well as we? and he commanded them to be bap- tized in the name of the Lord.' Where we seo that even they who received the Holy Ghost, and consequently had been baptized by the Spirit, were nevertheless commanded to be baptized in water. Hence St. Paul, Ephes. v. 25, 26. tells us, that * Christ loved the Church, and gave himself for it, that he might sanctify it, cleasing it by the laver of water, in the word of life:' and, Heb. x. 22. *Let us draw near with a true heart — having our hearts sprinkled from an evil conscience, and our bodies washed with pure water.' Q. What are the effects of the sacrament of baptism? A, First, it washes away original sin, in which we are all born, by reason of the sin of our first father, Adam. Secondly, it remits all actual sins, Which we ourselves have committed (in case we have committed any before baptism) both as to the guilt and pain. Thirdly, it infuses the habit of di- vine grace into our souls, and makes us the adopted children of God. Fourthly, it gives us a right and title to the kingdom of heaven. Fifthly, it imprints a character or spiritual mark in the soul. Sixthly, in fine, it lets us into the Church of God, and makes us children and members of the Church. Q. How do you prove that all sins are remitted in baptism? A. From Acts ii. 38. 'Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins' Acts xxii. 16. 'Arise and be baptized,' says Ananias to Paul, and wash away thy sins [in the Greek be washed from thy sins] calling upon the name of the Lord.' Ezekiel, xxxvi. 25. 'I will pour clean water upon you, and you shall be cleansed from all your filthiness.' CATHOLIC CHEISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 37 Hence, in the Nicene creed, we confess one bap- tism unto the remission of sins. Q. May not a person obtain the remission of his sins, and eternal salvation, without being actually baptized? A, In two cases he may. The first is, when a person not yet baptized, but heartily desiring bap» tism, is put to death for the faith of Christ, befor he can have this sacrament administered to him for such a one is baptized in his own blood. The second case is, when a person, that can by no means procure the actual administration of baptism, has an earnest desire of it, joined with a perfect love of God, and repentance of his sins, and dies in this disposition: for this is called the baptism of the Holy Ghost; Baptismus Flaminis. Q. From whence has baptism the power of con* fering grace, and washing away our sins? A, From the institution of Christ, and in virtue of his blood, passion and death. From whence also all the other sacraments have their efficacy. For there is no obtaining mercy, grace or salva- tion, but through the passion of Jesus Christ. Q. In what manner must a person, that is come to years of discretion, prepare himself for the sacrament of baptism? A. By faith and repentance: and therefore it is necessary that he be first well instructed in the Christian doctrine, and that he firmly believe all the articles of the Catholic Faith. Secondly, that he be heartily sorry for all his sins, firmly resolving to lead a good Christian life, to renounce all sinful habits, and to make full satisfaction to all whom he has any ways injured. Q. But what if a person should be baptized without being in these dispositions? 4 k 38 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. A, In that case he would receive the sacrament and character of baptism, but not the grace of the sacrament, nor the remission of his sins, which he cannot obtain until by a sincere repentance he detests and renounces all his sins. Q. Is it necessary for a person to go to confes- sion before he receives the sacrament of baptism? A, No, it is not : because the sins committed be- fore baptism are washed away by baptism, and not by the sacrament of penance; and therefore there s no need of confessing them. Q. What think you of those that put off for a long time their children's baptism. A. I think they are guilty of a sin, in exposing them to the danger of dying without baptism: since, as daily experience ought to convince them, young children are so quickly and so easily snatch- ed away by death. CHAPTER III. OF THE CEREMONIES OF BAPTISM; AND OF THE MAN- NER OF ADMINISTERING THIS SACRAMENT IN THE CATHOLIC CHURCH. Q. Why does the Church make use of so many ceremonies in baptism? A, First, to render thereby this mystery more venerable to the people. Secondly, to make them understand the effects of this sacrament, and what the obligations are, which they contract in this sacrament. Q. Are the ceremonies of baptism very ancient A, They are all of them very ancient, as may be demonstrated from the writings of the holy fathers; and as we know no beginning of them, CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 39 we have reason to conclude that they come from apostolical tradition. Q. In what places does the Church administer the sacrament of baptism? A, Regularly speaking, and excepting the case of necessity, she does not allow baptism to be ad- ministered any where else but in the churches which have fonts: the water of which by apostoli- cal traditions, is solemnly blessed every y«ar on the vigils of Easter and Whit-Sunday. Q. What is the meaning of having godfathers and godmothers in baptism? A. First, that they present to the Church the person that is to be baptized, and may be witnesses of his baptism; secondly, that they may answer in his name, and be sureties for his performance of the promises which they make for him. ,Q. What is the duty of godfathers and god- mothers? A, To see, as much as lies in them, that their godchildren may be brought up in the true faith, and in the fear of God; that they be timely in- structed in the whole Christian doctrine, and that they make good those engagments which they have made in their name. Q. May all sorts of persons be admitted for god- fathers and godmothers?. A, No: but only such as are duly qualified for discharging the obligations of a godfather or god- mother. Upon which account none are to be admitted that are not members of the Catholic Church; none whose lives are publicly scandalous; none who are ignorant of the Christian doctrine, &c. E,it. Rom. • Q. How many godfathers and godmothers may a person have in the Catholic Church? 4K) CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. A The council of Ti*ent, sess. 24. chap. 2. or- ders, that no one should have any more than one godfather and one godmother: that the spiritual kindred, which the child and its parents contract with the godfathers and godmothers, and which is an impediment of marriage, may not be extended to too many persons. Q. In what order or manner does the Catholic Church proceed in the administration of baptism? A First, the priest having asked the name of the person that is to be baptized, (which ought not to be any profane or heathenish name, but the name of some saint, by whose example he may be excited to a holy life, and by whose prayers he may be protected) inquires of him; ' N, what dost thou demand of the Church of God?' To which the person himself, if at age, or the godfather and godmother for him, answer, faith: by which is meant not the bare virtue, by which we believe what God teaches, but the whole body of Chris- tianity, as comprehending both belief and practice; into which the faithful enter by the gate of bap- tism. The priest goes on and asks; 'what does faith give thee?' Answ. Life everlasting. Priest, 'If then thou wilt enter into life keep the commandments; thou shalt love the Lord thy God with thy whole heart, and with thy whole soul, and with thy whole mind ; and thy neighbour as thyself.' After this, the priest blows three times upon the face of the person that is to be baptized, saying, ^depart out of him or her, O unclean spirit! and give place to the Holy Ghost the comforter.' This ceremony \^as practised by the universal Church, long before St. Augustine's days who calls it,* a * L. de Nuptis, c. 18. and 29. CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 41 most ancient tradition; and it is used in contempt of satan, and to drive him away by the Holy Ghost, who is called the Spirit or breath of God. Then the priest makes the sign of the cross, on the forehead and on the breast of the person that is to be baptized, saying, 'Receive the sign of the cross, upon thy forehead, and in thy heart; receive the faith of the heavenly commandments, and let thy manners be such, that thou mayest now be the temple of GocJ,' This sign of the cross upon the forehead, is to give us to understand, that we are to make open profession of the faith of a crucified God, and never to be ashamed of his cross: and the sign of the cross upon the breast is to teach us, that we are always to have Christ crucified in our hearts. After this, there follow some prayers for the person that is to be baptized, to beg of God to dis- pose his soul for the grace of baptism. Then the priest blesses some salt, and puts a grain of it in the mouth of the person that is to be baptized. By which ancient ceremony we are admonished to procure and maintain in our souls true wisdom and prudence; of which salt is an emblem or fi- gure, inasmuch as it seasons and gives a relish to all things. Upon which account it was command- ed in the; law, Levit. ii. 13. that salt should be used in every sacrifice or oblation made to God; to whom no offering can be pleasing where the salt of discretion is wanting. We are also admonished by this ceremony so to season our souls with the grace of God, as to keep them from the corruption of sin, as we make use of salt to keep things from corrupting. Then the priest proceeds to the solemn prayers and exorcisms, used of old by the Catholic Church 4* 42 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. in the administration of baptism, to call out the devil from the soul, under whose power we are born by original sin. 'I exorcise thee, says he, O unclean spirit! in the name of the Father ^, and of the Son ^, and of the Holy Ghost >i<, that thou mayest go out, and depart from this servant of trod, N. For he commands thee, O! thou accursed and condemned wretch, who with his feet walked upon the sea, and stretched forth his right hand to Peter that was sinking. Therefore, O accursed devil! remember thy sentence, and give honour to the living and true God. Give honour to Jesus Christ his Son, and to the Holy Ghost, and depart from this servant of God, N. For our God and Lord Jesus Christ has vouchsafed to call him to his holy grace and blessing and to the font of baptism.' Then he signs the forehead with the sign of the cross, saying, ^And this sign of the holy cross, which we imprint on his forehead, mayest thou, O cursed devil! never dare to violate, through the same Christ our Lord, Amen.' All that has been hitherto set down of the pray- ers and ceremonies of baptism, is usually perform- ed in the porch or entry of the church, to signify that the catechumen, or person that is to be bap- tized is not worthy to enter into the church, until the devil first be cast out of his soul. But after these prayers and exorcisms the priest reaches forth the extremity of his stole to the catechumen, or if it be an infant, lays it upon him, and so in- troduces him into the church, saying, ' N. come into the temple of God, that thou mayest have part with Christ, unto everlasting life, Amen.' Being come into the church, the Priest, jointly with the party that is to be baptized, or if it be an infant, with the godfather and godmother, recites CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 43^ aloud the Apostles' creed and the Lord's prayer. Then he reads another exorcism over the catechu- men, commanding the devil to depart in the name, and by the power of the most blessed Trinity. After which, in imitation of Christ, who cured with his spittle the man that was deaf and dumb, St. Mark vii. 32, &;c. he wets his finger with his spittle, and touches first the ears of the catechumen, saying, 'Ephphetha,' that is, be thou opened: then his nostrils, adding these words, 'unto the odour of sw^eetness.' 'But be thou put to fligth, O devil! for the judgment of God will be at hand,' by which ceremony the Church instructs her catechumens to have their ears open to God's truth, and to smell its sweetness; and begs this grace for them. Then the priest asks the person that is to be baptized, ' N, dost thou renounce Satan?' To which the person himself, if at age, otherwise the godfather and godmother in his name, answer: 'I renounce him.' The priest goes on, 'and all his works?' Answ. 'I renounce them.' Priest. 'And all his pomps?' Answ. 'I renounce them.' This solemn renouncing of Satan, and his works, and his pomps, in the receiving of baptism, is a practice as ancient as the Church itself, and in a particular manner requires our attention: because it is a promise and vow that we make to God, by which we engage ourselves to abandon the party of the devil, to have nothing to do with his works, that is, with the works of darkness and sin; and to cast away from us his pomps, that is, the maxims and vanities of the world. It is a covenant we make with God, by which we, on our part, pro- mise him our allegiance, and to fight against his enemies; and he, on his part promises us life ever- lasting, if we are faithful to our engagements. ^im 44 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. But in the moment we break this solemn covenant by wilful sin, we lose both the grace of baptism, and all that title to an eternal inheritance which we' received in baptism, together with the dignity of children of God; and become immediately slaves to the devil, and children of hell. After this renouncing Satan, and declaring war against him, to give us to understand what kind of arms we are to procure in this spiritual conflict, the priest anoints the catechumen upon the breast, and between the shoulders, with holy oil, which is solemnly blessed by the bishop every year on Maunday-Thursday ; which outward unction is to represent the inward anointing of the soul by divine grace, which, like a sacred oil, penetrates our hearts, heals the wounds of our souls, and for- tifies them against our passions and concupiscences. Where note, that the anointing of the breast is to signify the necessity of fortifying the heart with heavenly courage, to act manfully, and to do our duty in all things; and the anointing between the shoulders is to signify the necessity of the like grace to bear and support all the adversities and crosses of this mortal life. The words which the priest uses at this conjuncture are, 'I anoint thee with the oil of salvation in Christ Jesus our Lord, ^that thou mayest have eternal life. Amen.' Then the priest asks the catechumen, 'N, dost thou believe in God the Father Almighty, Creator of heaven and earth?' Answ. 'I believe.' Priest *Dost thou believe in Jesus Christ, his only Son, our Lord, who was born and who suffered for us?' Answ. 'I believe.' Priest. 'Dost thou believe in the Holy Ghost, the holy Catholic Church, the communion of Saints, the forgiveness of sins, the resurrection of the body, and life everlasting?' CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 45 Answ. ' I believe.' Which answers are made, either by the catechumen himself, if able, or by the god- father and godmother; and imply another part of the covenant of baptism, viz. the covenant of faith; by which we oblige ourselves to a steady and sin- cere profession of. the great truths of Christianity, and that not by words alone, but by the constant practice of our lives. After this the priest asks; 'iV. wilt thou be bap- tized?' Answ. 'I will.' Then the godfather and godmother both holding or touching their godchild, the priest pours the water upon his head three times in the form of a cross, or where the custom is to dip, dips him three times, saying at the same time these words; ' N. I baptize thee in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost.' Which words are pronounced in such manner, that the three pourings of the water con- cur with the pronouncing of the three names of the divine Persons. For the form is to be pro- nounced but once. But if there be a doubt whether the person has been baptized before or not? then the priest makes use of tins form, ' N. if thou art not already bap- tized, I baptize thee in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost.' Then the priest anoints the person baptized on the top of the head in form of a cross with holy chrism, which is a compound of oil and balm, so- lemnly consecrated by the bishop. Which cere- mony comes from apostolical tradition, and gives us to understand, first, that in baptism we are made partakers with Christ, (whose name signifies anointed) and have a share in his unction and grace. Secondly, that we partake also in some manner in his dignity of king and priest, as all 46 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. Christians are called by St. Peter, 1 Pet. ii. 9. a royal or kingly priesthood, and therefore we are anointed, in this quality as kings and priests are anointed. Thirdly, that we are consecrated to God by baptism, and therefore are anointed with holy chrism, which the Church is accustomed to make use of in anointing all those things which she so solemnly consecrates to the service of God. L The prayer which the priest recites on this occasion is as follows. ' May the Almighty God, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has regenerated thee of water and the Holy Ghost, and who has given thee the remission of all thy sins ^, anoint thee with the chrism of salvation in the same Christ Jesus our Lord, unto life everlast- ing.** Amen. Then the priest says, 'Peace be to thee.' Answ. 'And with thy spirit.' After which the priest puts upon the head of the person that has been baptized, a white linen cloth, commonly called the chrism, in place of the white garment with which the new Christians used formerly to be clothed in baptism, to signify the purity and innocence which we receive in baptism, and which we must take care to preserve until death. In putting on this white linen, the priest says, 'Receive this white garment, which thou mayest carry unstained, before the judgment-seat of our Lord Jesus Christ, that thou mayest have eternal life. Amen.' Then he puts a lighted candle into the hand of the person baptized, or of the godfather, saying, 'Receive this burning light, and keep thy baptism without reproof; observe the commandments of God, that when our Lord shall come to his nup- tials, thou mayest meet him together with all the saints, in the heavenly court, and mayest have life CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 47 eternal, and mayest live for ever and ever, Amen.' Which ceremony alludes to the parable of the ten virgins, St. Matt. xxv. who took their lamps and went forth to meet the bridegroom, and admonishes us to keep the light of faith ever burning by the oil of good works; that whensoever our Lord shall come, we may be found with our lamps burning, and may go in with him into the eternal life of his heavenly kingdom. Lastly, the priest addressing himself to the per- son baptized, says, ' N. go in peace, and the Lord be with thee, x\men.' Then he admonishes as well the parents, as the godfather and godmother, of their respective duty, with regard to the education and instruction of their child; and of the care which the Chuch requires of the parents, not to let the child lie in the same bed with them or with the nurse, for fear of its being overlaid. And lastly, informs them of the spiritual kindred which is con- tracted between the gossips and the child; which makes it unlawful for them afterwards to marry with those to whom they are thus spiritually allied. CHAPTER IV. OF THE SACRAMENT OF CONFIRMATION, AND OF THE MANNER OF ADMINISTERING IT. Q. What do you mean by confirmation? A, A sacrament by which the faithful after bap- tism receive the Holy Ghost, by the imposition of ihe hands of the bishop and prayer, accompanied with the unction or anointing of their foreheads with holy chrism. Q. Why do you call it confirmation? A. From its eflTect, which is to confirm or strength- 48 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAK INSTRUCTED. en those that receive it in the profession of the true faith, to make them soldiers of Christ, and perfect Christians, and to arm them against their spiritual enemies. Q. How do you prove from scripture, that the Apojtles practised confirmation? A. I prove it from Acts viii. 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 where we read of St. Peter and St. John confirm ing the Samaritans. ' They prayed for them that they might receive the Holy Ghost, .... then they laid their hands on them, and they received the Holy Ghost, &c. item, Acts xix. 5, 6. They were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. And when Paul had laid his hands on them, the Holy Ghost came on them."' It is of confirmation also that St. Paul speaks, Heb. vi. 1, 2. 'Not laying again the foundation, &c. of the doctrine of bap- tism, and of laying on of hands, &c.' And 2 Cor. i. 21, 22. 'Now he who confirmeth us with you in Christ, and hath anointed us, is God: who hath also sealed us, and given the earnest of the Spirit in our hearts.' Q. How do you prove that confirmation is a sacrament? A. First, because it is plain from Acts viii. that the visible sign of the imposition of hands has an- nexed to it an invisible grace, viz. the imparting of the Holy Ghost: consequently confirmation is a visible sign of invisible grace, and therefore is a sacrament. Secondly, because the Church of God from the Apostles' days, has always believed it to be a sacrament, and administered it as such. See St. Dioiiysius, L. de Eccles. Heriarch, c. 4. Ter- tullian L. de Baptismo^ c. 7. L. de Resurrectione carnis^ c. 8. L. de PrcBscrip. adversus HcBreses. c. 4. St, Cornelius^ Epist. ad Fdblum Antioch. apud CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 49 Eusehiwrij L. 6. Histor. c. 43. St, Cyprian, Epist. 70. ad Januarium, Epist. 72, ad Stephanum Papam, Epist, 73. ad Juhianum, Epist. 74. ad Pomperum. Firmilian, Epist. ad St. Cyprianum. The Council of Illiheris, Can. 38. The Council of Laodicea, Can. 48. St. Cyril of Jerusalem, Catech. 3. Mystag, St. Pacian. Epist. 1. ^ 3. ad Symnon. Sf in Sermone de Baptismo. St. Ambrose, L. de iis qui mysteriis initiantur, c. 7. The Author of the Books of the Sdcraments attributed to St. Ambrose, L. 3. c. 2. St. Optat. of Milevis. L. 7 contra Parmenianum. St. Hierome in Dialogo contra Luciferianos. St. Innocentius, Epist. 9. ad Dicentium. St. Augus- tine, Tract. 6. in Epist. 1. Joannis, L. 2. contra Li- teras Petilani, c. 104, c^c. St. Cyril of Alexan- dria, ad Joelis, 2. i?. 24. St. Leo Pope, Serm, 4. de nativi. Theodoret in comment, ad Cantic. 1. v. 3. St. Gregory the great, Homil. 17. in Evangelia, &fC. Q. Who is the minister of this sacrament? A. The ordinary minister of this sacrament is a bishop only. Q. Can this sacrament be received any more than once? A. No, because, like baptism, it imprints a char- acter or spiritual mark in the soul, which always remains. Hence, those that are to be confirmed are obliged to be so much the more careful to come to this sacrament worthily, because, it can be re- ceived but once; and if they then receive it un- worthily, they have no share in the grace which is thereby communicated to the soul; instead of which, they incur the guilt of a grievous sacrilege. Q. In what disposition is a person to be, in order to approach worthily to the sacrament of confirmation? A. He must be free from mortal sin, and in the 5 50 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. State of grace; for the Holy Ghost will never come into a soul which Satan possesses by mortal sin. Q. In what manner then must a person prepare himself for the sacrament of confirmation? A. First, he must examine 'his conscience, and if he finds it charged with wilful sin, he must take care to purge it by a good confession. Secondly, he must frequently and fervently call upon God, to dispose his soul for receiving theHoly Ghost. Q. What kind of grace does this sacrament communicate to the soul? A, It communicates to the soul the fountain of all grace, the Holy Ghost, with all its gifts; but more in particular a fortifying grace to strengthen the soul against all visible and inivisible enemies of the faith. Q. Is then this sacrament absolutely necessary to salvation? A. It is not so necessary, but that a person may be saved without it: yet, it would be a sin to neglect it, when a person might conveniently have it; and a crime to contemn or despise it. Q. What kind of persons stand most in need of the grace of this sacrament? A. Those that are the most exposed to persecu- tions upon account of their religion, or to tempta- tions against faith. Q. At what age may a person be confirmed? A. Ordinarily speaking, the Church does not give confirmation until the person is come to the use of reason, though sometimes she confirms in- fants; in which case great care must be taken, and they be put in mind, when they come to the use of reason, that they have received this sacrament. Q. What is the obligation that a christian takes upon him in confirmation? CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 51 A. He lists himself there for a soldier of Christ; and consequently is obliged, after having received this sacrament, to fight manfully the battles of his Lord. Q. May a person have a godfather or godmoth- er in confirmation? A, He may by way of an instructor and encour- ager in the spiritual warfare; and this godfather or godmother contracts the like obligations as in the sacrament of baptism, and the same spiritual kindred. Q. May a person .that is confirmed take a new name? A, It is useful so to do, not by way of changing one's name of baptism, but by way of adding to it another name of some saint, to whom one has a particular devotion, and by whose prayers he hopes to acquit himself more faithfully of the obli- gations of a soldier in Christ. Q. Is a person obliged to receive this sacrament fasting? A. No, he is not, though it is advisable so to receive it. Q. In what manner is the sacrament of con- firmation administered? A, First: the bishop turning towards those that are to be confirmed, with his hands joined before his breast, says, 'May the Holy Ghost come down upon you, and the power of the Most High keep you from sins.' Answ. Amen. Then signing himself with the sign of the cross, he says, ' Our help is in the name of the Lord.' Answ. Who made heaven and earth, &c. Then extending his hands towards those that art *o be confirmed (which is what the ancients 62 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. call the imposition of hands) he prays that they may receive the Holy Ghost. Bishop. Let us pray, O Almighty everlasting God! who hast vouch- safed to regenerate these thy servants by water and the Holy Ghost; and who hast given them the remission of all their sins; send forth upon them thy sevenfold Holy Spirit, the Comforter from heaven. Answ. Amen. Bisli. The spirit of wisdom and of understanding. Answ. Amen. Bish. The spirit of counsel and of fortitude. Answ. Amen. Bish, The spirit of knowledge and of piety. Answ. Amen. Bish. Replenish them with the spirit of thy fear, and sign them with the sign of the cross ►fi of Christ, in thy mercy, unto life everlasting: Through the same Jesus Christ thy Son our Lord who liveth and reigneth with thee in the unity of the same Holy Spirit, one God, for ever and ever. Amen. Then the bishop makes the sign of the cross with holy chrism, upon the forehead of each one of those that are to be confirmed, saying, ' N. I sign thee with the sign of the cross, I Confirm thee with the chrism of salvation, in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost, Amen.' After which he gives the person confirmed a Jittle blow on the cheek, saying. Pax tecu?n, that is, peace be with thee. Then the bishop standing with his face towards the altar, prays for those that have been confirm- ed, that the Holy Ghost may ever dwell in their CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 53 hearts, and make them the temple of his glory. And then dismisses them with this blessing: 'Be- hold thus shall every man be blessed, who feareth the Lord. May the Lord bless you from Sion, that you may see the good things of Jerusalem all the days of your life; and may have life ever- lasting, Amen. Q. I would willingly be instructed in the mean- mg of these ceremonies: therefore pray tell me first why the Church makes use of chrism in con- firmation, and what this chrism is? A. Chrism is a compound of oil of olives and balm of Gilead, solemnly consecrated by the bishop on Maundy-Thursday: and the unction, or outward anointing the forehead with Chrism, is to repre- sent the inward anointing of the soul in this sacra- ment with the Holy Ghost. The oil, whose pro- perties are to fortify the limbs, and to give a cer- tain vigour to the body, to assuage our pains, &c. represents the like spiritual effects of the grace of this sacrament in the soul, and the balm, which is of a sweet smell, represents the good odour or sweet savour of christian virtues, and an innocent life, with which we are to edify our neighbours after having received the sacrament. Q. Why is this unction made on the forehead, and in form of the cross? A. To give us to understand that the effect of this sacrament is to arm us against worldly fear and shame: and therefore we receive the standard of the cross of Christ upon our foreheads, to teach us to make an open profession of his doctrine and maxims; and not to flinch from this profession, for fear of any thing that the world can either say or do. Q. What is the meaning of the Bishop's giving 6* 54 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. a little blow on the cheek to the person that is confirmed ? ^ A. It is to imprint in his mind, that from this time forward he is to be ready, like a true soldier of Jesus Christ, to suffer patiently all kinds of affronts and injuries for his faith. Q. And why does the bishop, at the same time as he gives the blow, say, peace be with thee? A, To signify that the true peace of God, which, as St. Paul says,'^ exceeds all understanding, is chiefly to be found in patient suffering for God and his truths. CHAPTER V. OF THE SACRAMENT OF THE EUCHARIST. Q. What do you mean by the sacrament of the Eucharist? A, The sacrament which our Lord Jesus Christ instituted at his last supper, in which he gives us his body and blood under the forms or appearances of bread and wine. Q. Why do you call this sacrament the Eu- charist? A. Because the primitive Church and the holy fathers! have usually called it so: for the word Eu- charist in the Greek signifies thanksgiving, and is applied to this sacrament, because of the thanks- giving which our Lord offered in the first institu- tion of it, St. Matt. xxvi. 27. St. Mark xiv. 23. St. Jjuke xxii. 19. 1 Cor. xi. 24. .And because of the * Philip, iv. 7. t St. Justin, in Apolog. 2. St. Irenaeus, 1. 4. c. 34. Tertullian L. de Cor. militis, c. 3. St. Cyprian Epist. 64, First Council of Nice, Can. 18. CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 55 thanksgiving with which we are obliged to offer and receive this great sacrament and sacrifice, which contains the abridgment of all God's won- ders, the fountain of all grace, the standing memo- rial of our redemption, and the pledge of a happy eternity. This blessed sacrament is also called the holy communion, because it unites the faithful with one another, and with their head Christ Jesus, 1 Cor. X. 16, 17. And it is called the supper of the Lord, because it was first instituted by Christ at his last supper. Q. What is the faith of the Catholic Church, concerning this sacrament? A. That the bread and wine are changed by the consecration into the body and blood of Christ. Q. Is it then the belief of the Church that Jesus Christ himself, true God and man, is truly, really and substantially present in the blessed sacrament? A, It is, for where the body and blood of Christ are, there his soul also and his divinity must needs be. And consequently, there must be whole Christ God and man : there is no taking him in pieces. Q. Is that which they receive in this sacrament the same body as that which was born of the bless- ed Virgin, and which suffered for us upon the cross. A. It is the same body: for Christ never had but one body: the only difference is, that then his body was mortal and passible, it is now immortal and impassible. Q. Then the body of Christ in the sacrament cannot be hurt or divided, neither is it capable of being digested or corrupted? A, No, certainly, for though the sacramental spe- cies, or the outward forms of bread and wine are liable to these changes, the body of Christ is not. Q. Is it then a spiritual body ? 1 56 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. A, It may be called a spiritual body, in the same sense as St. Paul, 1 Cor. xv. 44. speaking of the resurrection of the body, says, 'It is sown a natu- ral body, it is raised a spiritual body :' not, but that it still remains a true body, as to all that is essen- tial to a body; but that it partakes in some measure of the qualities and properties of a spirit. SECTION I. THE FIRST PROOF OF THE REAL PRESENCE, FROM THE WORDS OF CHRIST AT THE FIRST INSTITUTION OF THIS BLESSED SACRAMENT. Q. How do you prove the real presence of the body and blood of Christ in this sacrament? A. I prove it first from the express and plain words of Christ himself the eternal truth, deliver- ed at the time of the first insiitution of this blessed sacrament, and recorded in no less than four dif- ferent places in the New Testament, viz, St. Matt, xxvi. 26, 27. St. Mark xiv. 22. 24. St. Luke xxii. 19. 1 Cor. xi. 24, 25. In all these places Christ himself assures us that what he gives us in the blessed sacrament is his own body and blood, St. Matt. xxvi. 'Take eat; this is my tmd^i. . . . This is my BLOOD of the New Testament^ which is shed for many for the remission of sins.' St. Mark xiv, 'Take, eat; this is my. body — T\\\?, is my blood of the New Testament, which is shed for many.*^ St. Luke xxii. ^This is my body which is given for you — This cup is the New Testament in my blood which is shed for you.' 1 Cor. xi ' This is my body which is broken (klomenon saciificed) for you — This cup is the New Testament in my blood.* Now the body which was given and sacrificed for CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 57 US, the blood of the New Testament which was shed for us, are verily and indeed the real body and blood of Christ. Therefore, what Christ gives us in this blessed sacrament is his real body and blood: nothing can be more plain. Q. Why do you take these words of Christ at his last supper according to the letter, rather than in the figurative sense? A. You might as well ask a traveller why he chooses the high-road, rather than to go by bye- paths with evident danger of losing his way. We take the words of Christ, according to their plain, obvious and natural meaning, agreeably to that ge- neral rule acknowledged by our adversaries,* that in interpreting scripture, the literal sense of the words is not to be forsaken, and a figurative one followed without necessity; and that the natural and proper sense is always to be preferred, where the case will admit it. It is not therefore incum- bent upon us to give a reason why we take these words of Christ, according to their natural and proper sense: but it is our adversaries, business to show a necessity of taking them otherwise. The words themselves plainly speak for us; for Christ did not say, this is a figure of my body, and this is a figure of my blood; but he said, this is my body, and this is my blood. It is their duty, as they tender the salvation of their souls, to beware of offering violence to texts so plain, and of wresting them from their evident meaning. However, we have many reasons to offer why we take the words of Christ (which he spoke at his last supper in the institution of the blessed sacra- .ment) in their most plain, natural and obvious * Dr. Harris's sermon on transubstantiation, p. 7, 8. 58 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. meaning. First, because he was then all alone with his twelve Apostles, his bosom friends and confidants, to whom he was always accustomed to explain in clear terms whatever was obscure in his parables or other discourses to the people, St. Mark iv. 11. 'To you, says he to his disciples, it is given to know the mystery (the secrets) of the kingdom of God, but unlo them that are without, all things are done in parables.' And ver. 34. ' Without a parable spoke he not unto them (the people) but when they were alone he expounded all things to his disciples.' St. John xv. 15. ^Henceforth I call you not servants; for the ser- vant knoweth not what his Lord doth: but I have called you friends, for all things that I have heard of my Father, I have made known unto you.' How then is it likely that in this most important occasion of all, when, the very night before his death, he was taking his last leave and farewell of these his dear friends, he should deliver himself to them in terms which (if they are not to be' taken according to the letter) are obscure beyond all example, and not anywhere to be paralleled? Secondly, he was at that time making a cov- enant, which was to last as long as time itself should last: he was enacting a law, which was to be for ever observed in his Church: he was insti- tuting a sacrament, which was to be frequented by all the faithful until he should come: he was, in fine, rnaking his last will and testament, and there- in bequeathing to his disciples, and to us all, an admirable legacy and pledge of his love. Now such is the nature of all these things, viz. of a covenant of a law, of a sacrament, of a last will and testament, that as he that makes a covenant, a law, &c. always designs, that what he covenants, CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 59 appoints, or ordains, should be rightly observed and fulfilled; so of consequence he always designs that it should be rightly understood; and therefore always expresses himself in plain and clear terms in his covenants, laws, &;c. This is what all wise men ever observe in their covenants, laws, and last wills, industri\Dusly avoiding all obscure expres- sions, which may give occasion to their being mis- understood, or to contentions and lawsuits about their meaning. This is what God himself observ- ed in the old covenant; in all the ceremonial and moral precepts of the law: in all the command- ments, in the institution of the legal sacraments, &;c. All are expressed in most clear and plain terms. It can then be nothing less than impeach- ing the wisdom of the Son of God, to imagine that he should make his new law and everlasting cov- enant in figurative and obscure terms, which he knew would be misunderstood by the greatest part of Christendom; or to suppose that he should insti- tute the chief of all his sacraments, under such a form of words, which in their plain, natural and obvious meaning, imply a thing so widely different from what he gives us therein, as his own body is from a bit of bread ; or, in fine, to believe that he would make his last will and testament, in words af- fectedly ambiguous and obscure; which, if taken ac- cording to that sense which they seem evidently to express, must lead his children into a pernicious er- ror concerning the legacy that he bequeaths them. In effect, our Lord certainly foresaw that his words would be taken according to the letter by the bulk of all Christendom; that innumerable of the most learned and most holy would understand them so; that the Church even in her general councils would interpret his words in this sense. 60 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. It must be then contrary to all probability that he who foresaw all this would affect to express him- self in this manner, in his last will and testament, had he not meant what he said, or that he should not have some where explained himself in a more clear way, to prevent the dreadful consequence of his whole Church's authorising an error in a mat- ter of so great importance. Q. Have you any other reason to offer for tak- ing the words of the institution according to the letter, rather than in a figurative sense? A, Yes, we have for so doing, as I have just now hinted, the authority of the best and most authentic interpreter of God's words, viz. his holy Church; which has always understood these words of Christ in their plain literal sense, and condemn- ed all those that have presumed to wrest them to a figure. 'Witness the many synods held against Berengarius; and the decrees of the general councils of, Lateran, Constance, and Trent. Now against this authority HelPs gates shall never prevail, St. Matt. xvi. 18. And with this interpreter Christ hast promised, that both he himself and the Holy Ghost, the Spirit of truth, should abide for ever, St. Matt, xxviii. 20. and St. John xiv. 16, 17. Q. But are not many of Christ's sayings to be understood figuratively, as when he says, that he is a door, a vine, &c.? And why then may not also the words of the institution of the blessed sacrament be understood figuratively? A. It is a very bad argument to pret^d to infer that because some of Christ's words are to be taken figurately, therefore all are to be taken so: that because in his parables or similitudes hisL. words are not to be taken according to the letter, therefore we are to wrest to a figurative sense, the words of CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 61 the institution of his solemn covenant, law, sacra- ment, and testament, at his last supper: that be- cause he has called himself a door, or a vine, in circumstances in which he neither was, nor ever could be misunderstood by any one, (he having taken so much care in the same places to explain his own meaning) therefore he would call bread and wine his body and blood, in circumstances, in which it was natural to understand his words according to the letter, as he foresaw all Christendom would understand them, and yet has taken no care to prevent this interpretation of them. There is therefore a manifold disparity betweeu the case of the expressions you mention, viz. I am the door, the vine, &c. and the words of the last supper, ' this is my body, this is my blood.' First, because the former are delivered as parables and similitudes, and consequently as figures; the latter are the words of a covenant, sacrament, and testa- ment, and therefore are to be understood accord- ing to their most plain and obvious meaning. Secondly, because the former are explained by Christ himself in the same places in a figurative sense, the latter are not. Thirdly, because the former are worded in such a manner, as to carry with them the evidence of a figure, so that no man alive can possibly misunderstand them, or take them in any other than a figurative meaning; the latter are so expressed, and so evidently imply the literal sense, that they that have been the most desirous tp find a figure in them have been puzzled to do it;"^ and all Christendom has for many ages * It was the case of Luther himself, as we learn from his epistle to his friends at Strasburg, torn. 5. fol. 502. nnd of Zuinglius, as we learn from his epistle to Pomeranus, fol. 256. 6 62 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. judged without the least scruple that they ought to be taken according to the letter. Fourthly, be- cause the Church of God has authorized the liieral interpretation of the words of the institution of the blessed sacrament: not so of those other expres- sions. In fine, because according to the common laws and customs of speech a thing may indeed, by an elegant figure, be called by the name of that thing of which it has the qualities or properties; and thus Christ, by having in himself the property of a door, inasmuch as it is by him that we must enter into his sheepfold, St. John x. 9. and the pro-, perty of the vine, in giving life and fruit to its branches, St. John xv. 1. might, according to the usual laws of speech, elegantly call himself a door and a vine; but it would be no elegant metaphor, to call bread and wine, without making any change in them, his body and blood; because bread and wine have in themselves neither any similitude, nor quality, nor property of Christ's body and blood; as it would be absurd, for the same reason, to point at any particular door or vine, and say, this is Jesus Christ. Q. But may not the sign or figure according to the common laws of speech, be called by the name of the thing signified? And have we not instances of this nature in scripture; as when Joseph, inter- preting the dream of Pharaoh, Gen. xli. 26. says, 'the seven good kine are seven years?' and our Lord interpreting the parable of the sower, St. Luke viii. 11. says, 'the seed is the word of God;' jand St. Paul 1 Cor. x. 4. says, ' the rock was Christ?' ^ A, In certain cases', when a thing is already known to be a sign or figure of something else, which it signifies or represents, it may indeed, according to the common laws of speech and the CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. C3 use of the scripture, be said to be such or such a thing; as in the interpretation of dreams, parables, ancient figures, and upon such like occasions; where when a thing is said to be this or that, the meaning is evident, viz. that it signifies or repre- sents this or that. But it is not the same in the first institution of a sign or figure; because, when a thing is not known beforehand to be a sign or representation of some other thing, to call it ab- ruptly by a foreign name would be contrary to all laws of speech, and both absurd and unintelligible. As for instance, if a person by an art of memory had appointed within himself, that an oak tree should be a sign or memorandum of Alexander the Great, and pointing to the tree, should gravely tell his friends, (who were not acquainted with his design) this is that hero that overcome Darius, such a proposition as this would justly be censured as nonsensical and unworthy of a wise man; be- cause such a figure of speech would be contrary to all laws of speech, and unintelligible. Just so would it have been, if our Saviour, at his last sup- per, without giving his disciples any warning be- forehand, any meaning to speak figuratively, and without their considering beforehand the bread and wine as signs and representations of any thing else, should have abruptly told them, 'This is my body, this is my blood,' had he not meant that they were BO indeed. For abstracting from the change which Christ was pleased to make in the elements by his Almighty word, a bit of bread has no more simili- tude to the body of Christ than an oak tree has to Alexander the Great. So that nothing but the real presence of Christ's body and blood could verify his words at his last supper, or vindicate them from being highly absurd and unworthy the Son of God. 64 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. Q. But do not those words which our Lord spoke, St. Luke xxii. 19. ^this do in remembrance of me,' sufficiently clear up the difficulty, and determine his other words to a figurative sense? A. These words, 'Do in remembrance of me,' inform us indeed of the end for which we are to offer up, and to receive the body and blood of Christ, viz. for a perpetual commemoration of his death, 1 Cor. xi. 26. but they no way interfere with these other words, 'This is my body, and this is my blood,' so as to explain away the real presence of Christ's body and blood. For why should Christ's body and blood be less present in the sacrament, because we are commanded in the receiving of them to remember his death? certainly St. Matthew and St. Mark, who in ;their gospels have quite omitted those words, 'Do this in re- membrance of me,' never looked upon them as a necessaiy explication of the words of the institu- tion, or as any ways altering or qualifying the natural and obvious meaning of these words, 'this is my body.' Q. But does not the remembrance of a thing suppose it to be absent: for otherwise, why should we be commanded to remember it? A, Whatsoever things we may be liable to for- get, whether really present or really absent, may be the object of our remembrance,- and thus we are commanded in scripture to remember God, Duet, viii. 18. Eccles. xii. 1, though in him we live, move and have our being, Acts xviii. 28. So that this command of remembering Christ is no ways opposite to his real presence: but the most that can be inferred from it is, that he is not visibly present; which is very true, and therefore, lest we should forget him, this remembrance is enjoined. CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 65 Besides, if we hearken to the Apostle, 1 Cor. xi. 26, he will inform us that what we are commanded to remember is the death of Cnrist; now, the death of Christ is not a thing really present, but really past, and therefore a most proper subject for our remembrance. SECTION II. THE SECOND PROOF OF THE KEAL PRESENCE FROM ST. JOHN VI. 51, ETC. Q. What other proof have you for the real pre- sence of Christ's body and blood in the sacrament of the eucharist, besides the words of the institu- tion, this is my body, and this is my blood? A. We have a very strong proof in the words of Christ, spoken to the Jews in the sixth chapter of St. John; where, upon occasion of the miracle of feeding the multitude with five loaves, having spoken of the necessity of believing in him who is the living bread that came down from heaven, he passes, from this discourse concerning faith, to speak of this sacrament, ver. 51, &c. '1 am the living bread that came down from heaven: if any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever, and the bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.' The Jews there- fore strove among themselves, saying, how can this man give us his flesh to eat? Then Jesus said unto them, 'verily, verily, I say unto you, except ye eat of the flesh of the son of man, and drink his blood, you shall not have life, in you. Whosoever eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood hath eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day; for my flesh is meat indeed, and my 6* 66 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. blood is drink indeed. He that eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood, dvvelleth in me, and I in him. As the living Father hath sent me, and I live by the Father: so he that eateth me, even he shall live by me. This is that bread which came down from heaven, not as your fathers did eat manna, and are dead: he that eateth of this bread shall live for ever.' In which words the eating of Christ's flesh, and the drinkmg his blood, is so strongly, so clearly, and so frequently inculcated; tind we are so plainly told, that the bread which Christ was to give, is that very flesh which he gave for the life of the world, that one must be resolved to keep one's eyes shut against the light, if one will not see so plain a truth. Q. How do you prove that Christ in this is speaking of the blessed sacrament? A, By comparing the words which he spoke upon this occasion with those which he delivered at his last supper in the institution of the blessed sacrament: in the one place he says, Uhe bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world,' in the other, taking bread and distributing it, he says, ' this is my body which is given for you.' Where it is visible that the one is a promise which the other fulfils; and conse- quently that both the one and the other have rela- tion to the same sacrament. Hence we find, that the current of the holy fathers has always ex- plained those words of the sixth chapter of St. John, as spoken of the sacrament. See St. Irenaeus L. 4. c. 34; Origen Hom. 16. upon Numbers; St. Cyprian upon the Lord's Prayer; St. Hilary, in his 8th Book of the Trinity; St. Basil, his Moral Rules, Reg. 1, c. 1; St. Cyril, of Jerusalem, Catech. Mys- tag. 4; St. Ambrose, of the Mysteries, c. 8; St. CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 67 John Chrysostom, St. Augustine, and St. Cyril, of Alexandria, writing upon the sixth chapter of St. John; St. Epiphanius Haeresi 55; Theoderet L. 4. Hist. Eccles. c. xi, &c. Q. But does not Christ promise eternal life, St. John vi. 51, 54, and 58, to every one that eateth of that bread of which he is there speaking; which promise cannot be understood with relation to the sacrament, which many receive to their own con- demnation, 1 Cor. xi. 29? A. He promises eternal life to every one that eateth of that bread; but this is to be understood, provided that he eat it worthily, and that he per- severe in the grace which he thereby receives. And in this sense it is certain that this sacrament gives eternal life: whereas, the manna of old had no such power, ver. 54. In like manner our Lord promises, St. Matt. vii. 7, 8. 'that every one that asketh shall receive:' and yet many ask and re- ceive not, because they asketh not as they ought. St. James iv. 3, Thus St. Paul tells us, Rom. x. 13, 'that whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved:' which also cer- tainly must be understood, provided they do it worthily and perseverently; lest this text contra- dict that other, St. Matt. vii. 21, 'Not every one thaj; saith to me. Lord! Lord! shall enter into the kingdom of heaven: but he that doeth the will of my Father who is in heaven.' Thus, in fine, Christ tells us St. Mark xvi. 16. 'He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved.' And yet many believe and are baptized, like Simon Magus, Acts viii. 13. 'who for want of a true change of heart, or of perseverance in good, are never saved.' Q. But if those words of Christ, St. John vi. 52, 53, &c. be understood of the sacrament, will it not 68 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN XNSTRUOTED. follow that no one can be saved without receiving this Sacrament, and that also in both kinds; con- trary to the belief and practice of the Catholic Church, since our Lord tells us, verse 63, 'verily, verily, I say unto you, except you eat of the flesh of the son of man, and drink his blood, you have not (or you shall not have) life in you?' A, It follows from those words that there is a divine precept for the receiving this blessed sacra- nient, which if persons wilfully neglect, they can- not be saved. So that the receiving this sacrament either actually, or in desire, is necessary for all those that are come to the years of discretion, (not for infants, who are not capable of discerning the body of the Lord, 1 Cor. xi. 29.) But that this sacrament should be received by all in both kinds, is not a divine precept, nor ever was understood to be such by the Church of God, which always believed that under either kind Christ is received whole and entire, and that consequently under either kind we sufficiently comply with the precept of receiving his flesh and blood. Q. Why may not these words of Christ, St. John vi. 61, 62, 63, &c. be taken figuratively, so as to mean no more than the believing in his in- carnation and death? A, Because it would be too harsh a figures of speech, and unbecoming the wisdom of the Son of God, to express the believing in him by such strange metaphors as eating his flesh, and drinking his blood, such as no man ever used before or since; and to repeat and inculcate these expres sions, so often to the great offence both of the Jews} and even of his own disciples, who upon this ac- count went back and walked no more with him, ver. 60, and Q^. when he might so easily have CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED, 69 satisfied both the one and the other, by telling them that he meant no more by all that discourse, than that they should believe in him. Q. Did then the Jews and those disciples who cried out, ver. 60, ' This is a hard saying, smd who can hear it?' understand our Saviour right, or did they mistake his meaning? A. They understood him right, so far, as relates to the real receiving his flesh and blood; but as to the maimer of receiving they understood him not; since they had no thoughts of his giving himself whole and entire, veiled in a sacrament, but appre- hended the eating of his flesh, cut off from his bones, and drinking of his blood, according to the vulgar manner of other meat and drink, which we digest and consume. However their not under- standing him seems not to have been so faulty, as their refusing to believe him: hence our Lord, reprehends not their want of understanding, but their not believing, ver. 64. And Peter, in the name of the Apostles, ver. 68, 69. in opposition to those disciples that had fallen oflT, says, 'Lord! to whom shall we go? thou hast the words of eternal life. And we believe and are sure that thou art Christ the Son of the living God.' So that these ought, like the Apostles, to have submitted them- selves to believe what as yet they understood not; and not to have run away from him, who by his evident miracles proved himself to be the Son of God, and consequently incapable of an untruth. By which example, we may see how much more wisely Catholics act (who in this mystery, like the Apostles, submit themselves to believe what they cannot comprehend, because they know that Christ has the words of eternal life) than those who like (he apostate disciples cry out, ' This is a hard say- 70 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTEI>. ing and who can hear it?' and thereupon will walk no more with Christ and his Church. Q. What did our Lord say to his disciples, who were offended with his discourse concerning the eating of his flesh? A, He said unto them, ver. 61, 62. ^Doth this offend you? what, and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before:' which words are variously interpreted, and may either be un- derstood to signify, that they who made a difficulty of believing that he could give them his flesh to eat, then whilst he was visible amongst them, would have much more difficulty of believing it after he was gone from them by his ascension: or else Christ, by mentioning his ascension, would correct their mistaken notion of giving them his flesh and blood, in that gross manner which they apprehended : or, in fine, he rr^ntioned his ascen- sion into heaven, to convince their incredulity, by the evidence of so great a miracle, which at once was to demonstrate both his Almighty power and the truth of his words. Q. What is the meaning of the following words, ver. 63. 'It is the spirit that quickeneth, the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that 1 speak unto you, they are spirit and they are life.' A. The meaning is, that the flesh separated from the spirit, in the manner which the Jews and incredulous disciples apprehended, would profit no- thing: for what would it avail us to feed upon dead flesh, separated from the soul and divinity, and consequently from the lifcgiving spirit? But then it would be blasphemy to say that the flesh oi Christ, united to his spirit (in that manner in which the Catholic Church believes his flesh to be in the blessed sacrament accompanied with his CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 71 soul and divinity) profits nothing: for if the flesh of Christ were of no profit, he would never have taken flesh for us, and his incarnation and death would be unprofitable to us: which is the height of blasphemy to affirm. What means the flesh profits nothing? says St, Augustine, writing upon this text, Tract. 27. in Joan. It profits nothing, as they understood it; for they understood flesh as it is torn in pieces in a dead body, or sold in the shambles ; and not as it is animated by the spirit. Wherefore it is said, the flesh profits nothing, in the samo manner as it is said, * knowledge puffeth up.' 1 Cor. viii. 1. Must we then fly from knowiedge? Grod forbid: what then means knowledge puffeth? That is, if it be alone without charity,- therefore the Apostle added, but charity edifieth. Join therefore charity to knowledge, and knowledge will be profitable not by itself, but through charity: so here also the flesh profiteth nothing, viz. the flesh alone: let the spirit be joined with the flesh, as charity is to be joined with knowledge, and then it profits much. For 'd the flesh profiteth nothing, the W^ord would not have been made flesh, that he might dwell in us. So far St. Augustine. Besides, according to the usual phrase of scrip- ture, flesh and blood are often taken for the cor- ruption of our nature, as for man's natural sense and apprehension, &;c. As when it is said, 1 Cor. XV. 50. ' That flesh and blood cannot inherit the| kingdom of God.' And St. Matt. xvi. 17. 'flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, &c.' •And in this sense the flesh profiteth nothing, but it is the spirit and grace of God that quickeneth and giveth life to our souls. And as the words which our Lord had spoken to them tended to insinuate 72 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN IIfSTKirCTEI>, to them so great a sacrament in which they should receive this spirit, grace and life in its very foun- tain ; therefore he tells them, the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life. SECTION III. OTHER PrOOFS OF THE REAL PRESENCE OF CHRIST's BODY AND BLOOD IN THE BLESSED SACRAMENT. Q. Have you any other proofs from scripture of the real presence of the body and blood of Christ in the blessed sacrament ? A. Yes, 1 Cor. x. where the Apostle, to dis- courage christians from having any thing to do with the sacrifices offered to idols, tells them, ver. 16. ^That the cup of blessing, which we bless, is the communion of the blood of Christ, and the bread which we break, is the communion of the body of Christ.' Secondly, 1 Cor. xi. 27. ^ Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread, or drink this cup of the Lord unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord.' How so, if what the unworthy re- ceiver takes be no more than bread and wine? Thirdly, 1 Cor. xi. 29. 'He that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damna- tion to himself, not discerning the body of tlie Lord.' How shall he discern it, if it be not there really present? Q. Have you any thing more to add by way of proof out of Scripture? A. Yes, from the ancient figures of the Euch arist, which demonstrate that there is something more noble in it than bread and wine, taken only in remembrance of Christ. CATH^IC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 78 Q. What are those ancient figures? A. There are many; but I shall take notice chiefly of three, viz. The paschal lamb, the blood of the testament, and the manna from heaven. Q. How do you prove that these three were figures of the Eucharist? A, I prove it with regard to the paschal lamb, (which is acknowledged at all hands to have been a type of Christ) because it is visible, that the rites and ceremonies of it, prescribed Exodus xii. had chiefly relation to eating of it; and consequently to this typical lamb in the Old Testament, corres- ponds in the New Testament the lamb of God, as eaten by his people in this sacrament: which for this reason was instituted immediately after our Lord had eat the passover with his disciples, that the figure might be both explained and accomplish- ed, and might make way for the truth. See con- cerning this figure the current sense of the fathers in Tertuliian, L. 4, in Marcionem; St. Cyprian, L. de unitate Ecclesise; St. Hierome in c. 26. St. Mat- thsei; Chrysostom, Homil. de Proditione Judse; St. Augustine, L. 2. contra Literas Petiliani, c. 37; St. Gaudentius, Tract. 2. in Exod. St. Cyril of Alexan- dria, contra Nestor, p. 112; Theodoret in 1 Cor. xi; St. Leo Serm. 7. de Passione Domini; Hesychius in c. 23. Levit. St. Gregory Horn. 22, in Evang. Secondly, that the blood of the testament with which Moses sprinkled the people, Exod. xxlv. and Heb. ix. saying, ' This is the blood of the testament which God hath enjoined to you,' was a figure of the blood of Christ in this sac^-ament, our Lord himself sufficiently declared, by evidently alluding to this figure, when he gave the cup to his dis- ciples, saying, 'This is my blood of the New Tes- tament,' St. Matt. xxvi. 28. St. Mark xiv. 24, or, 7 74 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 'This cup is the New Testament in my blood.' St. Luke xxii. 20. 1 Cor. xi. 25. Thirdly, that the manna was a figure of this sacrament, appears from St. John vi. 58. 'Your fathers did eat manna and are dead, he that eateth of this bread shall live for ever.' And i'rom 1 Cor. X. where the Apostle speaking of the figures of our sacraments in the old law, and taking notice of the cloud, and the passage of the Red Sea, as figures of baptism, ver. 1. and 2., in the 3d and 4th verses, gives the manna and the water from the rock as figures of the Eucharist. The same is the current doctrine of the holy fathers, and is suffi- ciently demonstrated from the analogy which is found between the manna and this blessed sacra- ment. For which see the annotations, in the Do- way Bible, upon the XVI chapter of Exodus. Q. How do you prove from these ancient figures the real presence of Christ's body and blood in this sacrament? A. Because if in this sacrament there were no- thing more than bread and wine, taken in remem- brance of Christ, and as types and figures of his body and blood, then would the figures of the old law equal the sacraments of the new law, yea, far excel them. For who does not see that the paschal lamb was a more noble type, and far better repre- senting Christ than bread and wine? who does not perceive that the blood of victims solemnly sacri- ficed to God was a better figure of Christ's blood than the juice of the grape? Who can question but the heavenly manna, which is called the bread of angels, and was so many ways miraculous, was far beyond the bread of men? Who will not acknowledge that it is something more excellent and divine to foretell things to come, than only to CATHOi^IC gHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 75 commemorate things past: it must therefore be visible to every Christian, that if the paschal lamb, the blood of the testament, and the manna were types of Christ, given to us in this sacrament; that this sacrament itself must be something more than a type, figure or remembrance of Christ; and con- sequently must contain and exhibit him really to us. Q. But why may not a person suppose that the figures of the Old Testament might equal or excel the sacrament of the new? A. No one that pretends to the name of Chris- tian can suppose this: since the Apostle assures us that the old law had nothing but ' a shadow of the things to come;' Heb. x. 1. that all its sacrifices and sacraments were but ' weak and beggarly ele- ments,' Gal. iv. 9. and that it was annulled by rea- son of 'the weakness and unprofitableness thereof,' Heb. vii. 18. And does not the very nature of the things assure us, that the figure must be inferior to the things prefigured? Q. Have you any other argument from scrip- ture in favour of the real presence of our Lord's body in the blessed sacrament? A. Yes. Those innumerable texts of scripture, which prove the unerring authority of the Church of Christ, and the indispensable obligation of the faithful to follow the judgment of the church, and to rest in her decisions, plainly demonstrate that to be truth which the church has so long ago declared with relation to this controversy; and that all Christians are obliged to yield to this decision. Q. When did the church decide this matter? -4. As soon as ever it was called in question, that is about seven hundred years ago, in the days of Berengarius, who was the first that openly attacked the doctrine of the real presence, and was there- 76 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRXJCTED. apon condemned by the whole church, in no less than fourteen councils held during his life-time in divers parts of Christendom; and the deter- mination of these councils was afterwards con- firmed by the general councils of Lateran, Con- stance and Trent. Q, What scripture do you bring to show that all christians are obliged to submit to these decisions of the councils and pastors of the church? A, St. Matt, xviii. 17. 'If he neglect to hear the church, let him be to thee as a heathen and a pub- lican.' St. Luke X. 16. 'He that heareth you hear- eth me, and he that despiseth you, despiseth me, and he that despiseth me despiseth him that sent me.' St. John xx. 21. 'As my Father hath sent me, even so I send you.' Heb. xii. 7. 'Remember them which have the rule over you, who have spoken unto you the word of God, whose faith fol- low, ver. 17. 'Obey them that have the rule over you, submit yourselves.' St. John iv. 6. ' He that knoweth God heareth us, (the pastors of the church) he that is not of God heareth not us! by this we know the spirit of truth and the spirit of error.' And what wonder that Christ shouM require this submission to his church, and her pastors, and teachers, whom he has given for the perfecting of the saints, &c. that we henceforth be no more children tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine. — Since even in the old law, he required under pain of death, a submission to the Synagogue and her ministers, in their deci- sions relating to the controversies of the law; as may be seen, Deut. xvii. 8, 9, &c. Q. What scripture do you bring to show that the church is not liable to be mistaken in these decisions? CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 77 A. This is evidently proved from a great many- texts both of the Old and New Testaments: in which we are assured, first, ' that the church is the pillar and ground of the truth,' and consequently not liable to error, 1 Tim. iii. 15. Secondly, ' that Christ has built his church upon a rock, and that the gates of hell (the powers of darkness and error) shall not prevail against her, St. Matt. xvi. 18. Thirdly, that Christ (who is 'the way, the truth, and the life,' St. John xvi. 6.) 'will always be with the teachers of his church, even to the end of the world,' St. Matt, xxviii. 20. Fourthly, that the Holy Ghost, the Spirit of truth, shall abide for ever with these same teachers of the church,' St. John xvi. 16, 17. 'and guide them into all truth,' c. xvi. 13. Fifthly, 'that God has made a covenant with the church, that his Spirit, and his words, which he has put in her mouth at the time when our Redeemer came, should not depart out of her mouth, nor out of the mouth of her seed, nor out of the mouth of her seed's seed, from henceforth and for ever,' Isaiah lix. 20, 21. Sixth- ly, that God has made a solemn oath to his church, like that which he made to Noah, that he would not be wroth with her, nor rebuke her,' Isaiah liv. 9, 10. 'that he has promised to be her everlasting light, Isaiah Ix. 18, 19, &c.' 'and to set his sanctuary in the midst of her for evermore,' Ezek. xxxvii. 26. and which is inconsistent with her being led astray by damnable errors,- and thus the scripture, by plainly giving testimony to the church and church authority, plainly also gives testimony to the truth of Christ's real presence in the Eucharist, which has been so often declared by that authority. Q. Besides these arguments from scripture and 7* 78 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. church authority, have you any thing else to al- ledge in proof of the real presence? A, First, the authority of all the ancient fathers, whose plain testimonies may be seen in an appen- dix to a book entitled, a specimen of the spirit of dissenting teachers, &c. anno 1736. Secondly, the perpetual consent of the Greeks, and all the oriental christians, demonstrated by Monsieur Arnauld and the Abbe Renaudot in their books bearing title, 'la perpetuite de la foi^ &c. confirmed by the authentic testimonies* of their * See the testimony of seven archbishops of the Greek church, Perpetuite^ vol. iii. p. 569. the testinionies of the archbishops and clergy of the isles of the Archipelago, &c. of dive.rs abbots and religions, chap. iv. and v. of four patriarchs of Constantinople, of the patriarch of Alexan- dria, and of thirty-five metropolitans or archbishops, anno 1762. chap. vi. p. 623. of the churches of Georgia and Min- grelia, chap. vii. p. 634. of the patriarch of Jerusalem, and of several other archbishops, abbots, &c. p. 703. Of Ma- carius and Neophytus patriarchs of Antioch, p. 723, &c. of Mecroditus, patriarch of Constantinople, Responst ge- nerale^ p. 151. See also the orthodox confession of the oriental church, signed by the four patriarchs and many other bishops, ibidem, p. 138. That the same is the faith of the Armenians, is proved by the testimonies of Havia- :dour, an Armenian prelate, of Uscanus, bishop of St. Ser- jgius; also of David, the patriarch, and other bishops and -priests of the Armenians given at Aleppo, anno 1668. In the appendix to the first volume of the Perpetidte\ p. 78, -81, 82. Of James patriarch, of the greater Armenia, and and other bishops and priests. Response gcnerale, L. I. chap, xviii. Of the archbishops of the Armenians in Con- Btantinople, Adrianople and Amasaea, ibid. Of Crucia- dorus, patriarch of the lesser Armenia, with other bishops and priests, anno, 672. tom. 3. Perpetuite, p. 774. Of the Armenians of grand Cairo, anno, 1678. And of several bishops, at Ispahan, the same year, ibid. p. 775 and 778. See also in the first and third volume of the Perpetuite and in the Response generalc, many other attestations of the belief of the. Moscovites, Jacobites or Surians Cophts, CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 79 patriarchs, archbishops, bishops, abbots, &c. by the decrees of their synods,* against Cyril Lucar, by the writings of their ancient t and modern divines; and by all their liturgies: and cicknowiedged by -many t Protestant witnesses. Now what can be a Maronites, and Nestorians, touching the real presence and transubstantiation. * See the acts of the synod of Constantinople under the patriarch Cyril, of Beraea, anno, 1639. And of the synod under the patriarch, Parthenius, anno, 1642. And of the synod of Cyprus, anno, 1668. t See (besides the testimonies of the Greek fathers of the first six centuries) Anastasius, of Sina, in his Odegos, Germanus, Patriarch of Constantinople in his Theoria, St. John Damascene Orat. 3. de Imaginibus, Lib. 2. Parallel. c. 5. L. 4. Fidei Orthodoxae, c. 13. The second Council of Nice, of 350 bishops. Act 6. Elias Crer. Comment, in Orat. I. St. Greg. Naz. Niccephorus, Patriarch of Constan- tinople, Antiheretico 2. Theodorius Stuites, Antiheretic 1. Num. 10. Theophylactus ad Cap. 26. Samonus, Bishop of Gaza, in Discep. contra Achmet Saracenum, Nicholas of Methone. de Corp. and Sang. Christi. Nicholas Cabafilas. Mark of Ephesus and BefFarion ; qui omnes in suis optisculis^ says Bishop Forbes de Euch. L. 1. c. 3. aperlissime iransub- siarUialio7iem confitentur. Jeremias, Patriarcho in Resp. 1 and 2. ad Lutheranos. Gabriel Philadelph. de Sacrament. The Greeks of Venice, in Resp. ad Cardinal. Guis. Agapius, &c. See also in the additional volumes of Renaudot to the Perpetuite de la Foi, &c. the concurrent testimonies of the divines of the other oriental sects, and of all their liturgies. J Sir Edwin Sandy's relation of the Religions of the West, p. 233. Dr. Potter's Answer to Charity mistaken, p. 225. Bishop Forbes de Euch. L. 1. c. 3. p. 412. Crufius in Germanio-graecia. L. 5. p. 226. Danawerus, L. de Ec- cles. Grasc. hodierna, p. 46, &c. Hence Dr. Philip Nicho- las a Protestant, in his first book of the Kingdom of Christ, p. 22. writeth thus: *' Let my christian readers be assured, that not only the churches of the Greeks, but also the Russians, and the Georgians, and the Armenians, and the Indians, and the Ethiopians, as many of them as believe in Christ, hold the true and real presence of the body and blood of the Lord, &c." 80 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. more convincing evidence of this doctrine's having been handed down by tradition from the Apostles, than to see all sorts of Christians, which have any pretensions to aniiquity, all agreeing in it? Thirdly, both ancient and modern church history furnish us with many instances of miracles the best attested, which from time to time have been wrought in testimony of thQ same truth: of which in divers parts of Christendom there are standing monuments to this day. It would be too tedious to descend to particulars, and so much the less neces- sary, because all the miracles of Jesus Christ him- self, as they prove that he could not be a liar, so they demonstrate, that what he gives us in this sacrament, is verily and indeed his body and blood, as he has so clearly told us. SECTION IV. TRANSUBSTANTIATION PROVED. OBJECTIONS AN- SWERED. Q. What do you understand by transubstan- tiation ? A. That the bread and wine in the blessed sa- crament are truly, really, and substantially, chang- ed by consecration into the body and blood of Christ. Q. In what then does the catholic doctrine of transubstantiation differ from the consubstantiation maintained by the Lutherans? A. It differs in this, that Luther and his follow ers maintain the real presence of the body aiA blood of Christ in the bread and wine, or with the bread and wine: whereas the catholic church be- lieves that the bread and wine are converted into CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 81 the body and blood of Christ, so that there remains nothing of the inward substance of the bread and wine after consecration, but outward appearances or accidents. Q. How do you prove this transubstantiation? A. First, from the texts of scripture above quot- ed, especially from the words of institution, St. Matt. xxvi. 26, &;c. and from the words of Christ, St. John vi. 51, &c. for our Lord, when he first gave the blessed sacrament, did not say, 'In this, or with this, is mj body and blood;' but he said, *This is my body, and this is my blood.' Neither did he say, St. John vi. 51. 'In the bread that I will give, will I give you my flesh, &;c.' but he said, 'The bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.' Secondly, from the tradition of the ancient fa- thers, whose doctrine may be seen in the books above quoted. Thirdly, from the authority and decision of the church of God in her general councils of Lateran, Constance and Trent. And indeed supposing that the words of Christ, in the institution of the blessed sacrament are to be taken according to the letter, as both Catholic: and Lutherans agree, the most learned Protestants have often urged against Luther and his followers, that the catholic transubstantiation is more agree- able to the letter of Christ's words, than the Luth- eran consubstantiation. See the bishop of Meaiix's Histoire des Variations, L. 2, Num. 31, 32, 33. Q. But does not St. Paul, 1 Corinth, x. and xi speaking of the sacrament after consecration, call it bread? A. He does; and so do we, first, because it is the bread of life, the food and nourishment of the soul: 82 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. Secondly, because it still retains the qualities and accidents of bread: and has the whole outward appearance of bread: and therefore, according to the scripture-phrase is called bread, as angels in the shape of men, are oftentimes in scripture called men. See St. Luke xxvi. 4. Acts i. 10, &c. Thirdly, because it was consecrated from bread, and therefore, according to the method of speaking usual in scripture, is called bread, because it was made from bread; as man is called dust. Gen. iii. 19. because made out of dust; and the serpent is called a rod, Exod. vii. 12. because made from a rod, &c. Besides, we have two very good interpreters, that inform us what this bread is, of which St. Paul is there speaking, viz. the same Apostle when he tells us, 1 Cor. v. 16. that 'the bread which we break is the communion of the body of Christ;' and our Saviour himself, when he tells us, St. John vi. 61. 'The bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.' Q. But what will you say to our Saviour's calling the sacrament the fruit of the vine, St. Matt. xxvi. 29? A. If it were certain our Saviour had so called the consecrated wine of the blessed sacrament, it would prove no more than St. Paul's calling the other kind bread; that is, it would only show that the name of wine, or the fruit of the vine, might be given to it, from having the accidents and ap- pearances of wine, and having been consecrated from wine. But there is all the reason in the world to think, that this appellation of the fruit of the vine was given by our Saviour, not to the consecrated cup or chalice, but to the wine of the paschal supper, which they drank before the insti- CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 83 tution of the sacrament, this appears evident from St. Luke, who thus relates the whole manner, chap. xxii. Ver. 14. ' When the hour was come he sat down and the twelve Apostles with him.' 15. 'And he said unto tljem, with desire I have desired to eat this passover with you before I suffer.' 16. ' For I say unto you, I will not any more eat thereof, until it be fulfilled in the kingdom of God:' 17. 'And he took the cup and gave thanks, and gaid, take this and divide it amongst yourselves.' 18. 'For I say unto you, I will not drink of the fruit of the vine, until the kingdom of God shall come.' 19. 'And he took bread and gave thanks and brake it, and gave unto them, saying, this is my body which is given for you: this do in remem- brance of me ? 20. 'Likewise also the cup after supper, saying, this cup is the New Testament in my blood which is shed for you.' 28. 'But behold the hand of him that betrayeth me is with me on the table, &;c.' Where it is visible, that it was not the sacra- mental cup, but that which was drunk with the passover, to which our Saviour gives the name of the fruit of the vine. Q. But if the bread and wine do not remain after consecration, what then becomes of them? A, They are changed by the consecration into the body and blood of Christ. Q. How can bread and wine be changed into the body and blood of Christ? A, By the Almighty power of God, to whom no- thing is hard or impossible, who formerly changed I II ^ 84 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. water into blood, and a rod into a serpent, Exod. vii. and water into wine, St. John ii. and who daily changes bread and wine by digestion into our body and blood. Q. But do not all our senses bear testimony^ that the bread and win% still remain? A. No: they only bear testimony that there remain the colour and taste of bread and wine aa indeed there do : but as to the inward substance, that is not the object of any of the senses, nor can be perceived by any of them. Q. Are not our senses deceived in this case? A. Properly speaking they are not, because they truly represent what is truly there, viz. the colour, shape, taste, &c. of bread and wine. But it is the judgment is deceived when upon account of this colour, shape, taste, &c. it too hastily pronounces that this is bread and wine. Q. But are we not sufficiently authorized, by the testimony of the senses to make a judgment of a thing's being in effect, that which it has all the appearances of? A, Regularly speaking we are, when neither reason nor divine authority interposes itself, to oblige us to make another judgment. And thus the miracles and resurrection of Christ were de- monstrated to the Apostles by the testimony of their senses. But the case would have been alter- ed if God himself had assured them that what ap- peared to be flesh and bones, were indeed another thing: for in such a case they ought certainly to have believed the testimony of God, rather than their own senses. Q. Can you give me any instances in which the testimony of man's senses has represented one thing, and the divine authority of God's work has CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 85 assured us, that it was not indeed what it appeared to be, but quite another thing? A, Yes, we have many such instances in scrip- ture; as when angels have appeared in the shape of men, Gen. xviii. St. Matt, xxviii. St. Mark xvi. &c. and the Holy Ghost, in' the shape of a dove, St. Luke iii. 22, &c. Q. Is there not then any of our senses that we may trust to, in relation to the judgment that we are to make concerning the inward part of the sacrament of the Eucharist? A, Yes, we may safely trust to the sense of hearing; which informs us by the word of God, and the authority of the church of God, that what appears to be bread and wine in this sacrament, is indeed the body and blood of Christ; now faith comes by hearing, saith St. Paul, Rom. x. 17. and hearing by the word of God. Q. But if the substance of the bread and wine be not there, what is It then that gives nourish- ment to our bodies when we receive the sacrament? A. This sacrament was not ordained for tho nourishment of the body, but of the soul: though I do not deny but the body also is nourished, when we receive the blessed eucharist, not by the sub- stance of bread and wine, which is not there, nor by the body and blood of Christ, which are incor- ruptible, and therefore cannot be digested for our corporal nourishment; but by the quantity and other accidents of the bread and wine (if with the Aristotelian philosophers you suppose them really distinguished from the matter and substance) or by another substance, which the Almighty substitutes, when by the ordinary course of digestion the sa- cramental species are changed, and the body and blood of Christ cease to be there. 8 86 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. Q. But how can the accidents of bread and wine remain without the substance? A, By the almighty power of God: which an swer if it satisfy you not, I remit you to the Car- tesian philosophers, who will tell you, that as the body and blood of Christ, in the sacrament, are contained precisely in the same circumscription and dimensions as the bread and wine were before the consecration, it follows of course that they must affect our senses in the same manner* now colour, taste, &c. according to modern philosophy are nothing but the affections of our senses. See Purchot, Part 1. Phys. 2. Sect. 5. cap. 1. Q, How can the whole body and blood of Christ be contained in so small a space as that of the host; nay, even in the smallest sensible particle of it? A, By the same almighty power by which a camel can pass through the eye of a needle: with men that is impossible, says our Saviour, St. Matt, xix. 26. and St. Mark x. 27. 'but not with God, for with God all things are possible.' Q. How can the body of Christ be both in heavfen, and at the same time in so many places upon earth? A, By the same almighty power of God, which we profess in the very first article of our creed when we say, 'I believe in God the Father Al- mighty.' So that it is a question better becoming an infidel than a Christian to ask, ' How this can be?' when we are speaking of a God to whom no- thing is impossible; and who would not be God indeed, if he could not do infinitely more than we can conceive. It is like the Jewish question, St. John vi. 62. 'How can this man give us his flesh to eat?' As if the power of God were not as in- comprehensible as himself; and as if it were not CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 87 worse than madness for weak mortals to pretend to fathom this immense depth of the power of the Almighty, by the short line and plummet of hu- man reason. Q. But is it not an evident contradiction for the same body to be at once in two places? A. Not at all; no more than for one God to sub- sist in three distinct persons; or one person in two natures; or one soul to be at once both in the head and in the heart, or two bodies to be at once in the self-same place? as when Christ's body came into the disciples, the doors being shut, St. John xx. 26. or the same body, after having returned to dust, to be many ages after restored at the resurrection. Q. How do you prove that there is no evident contradiction in any of these things? A. Because thousands of as good philosophers and divines as any are, cannot see any such con- tradiction; which is a plain demonstration there is no evidence in the case; and consequently, it would be the highest rashness to deny the possibility of these things, to the power of the Almighty. Q. But what need was there that Christ should leave us his real body and blood in this sacrament; since without this real presence he might have bequeathed the self-same graces to our souls? A, He might iiideed, if so he had pleased; as he might also have brought &bout the salvation of mankind, if he had so pleased, without becoming man himself and dying upon a cross for us: but he chose these wonderous ways as most suitable to his love, and most proper to excite us to love him. And who shall presume to call him to an account why lie has condescended so far? Q. But are not the body and blood of Christ liable to be hurt and abused in the .sacrament? 8^ CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. A, The body and blood of Christ are now immor- tal, impassible and incorruptible, and consequently not liable lo be hurt, nor divided, nor corrupted: though it may be said indeed, to be abused by the the unworthy communicant; and upon that account St. Paul, 1 Cor. xi. 27, says, that such a one is * guilty of the body and blood of Christ:' but this abuse no more hurts the immortal body of Christ, than this or any other crime can hurt or violate his divinity. SECTION V. OF THE BREAD AND WINE MADE USE OF IN THIS SACRAMENT. Q. What kind of bread does the Church make use of for the sacrament of the eucharist? A, The Church of Rome makes use of wafers of unleavened bread; that is, of bread made of fine wheaten flour, with no other mixture but pure water. Q. Why does not the Church make use of com- mon bread for this sacrament? A. Because she follows the example of Christ, who at his supper, when he first instituted and gave the blessed sacrament to his disciples, made use of unleavened bread. Q. How do you prove that? A. I prove it, because the day in which Christ first gave the blessed sacrament, was according to St. Matt. xxvi. 17. St. Mark xiv. 12, and St. Luke xxii. 7. 'the first day of unleavened bread. Now upon that day, and for the whole following week, there was no other bread to be found in Israel; and it was even death to use any other but unleavened CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 89 bread, as we learn from Exod. xii. 15. 'Seven days shall ye eat unleavened bread, even the first day ye shall put away leaven out of your houses: for whosoever eateth leavened bread from the first day until the seventh day, that soul shall be cut off from Israel;' ver. 19. 'Seven days shall there be no leaven found in your, houses, &;c.' So that it is plain that our Saviour made use of unleavened bread at his last supper, and that there was no other bread used at that time. Q. Is there any other reason why we should prefer unleavened bread? A, Yes, unleavened bread is an emblem or sym- bol of sincerity and truth. Hence St. Paul admon- ishes us, 1 Cor. V. 7, and 8, to ' purge out the old leaven of malice and wickedness, and to feast with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth.' Q. What kind of wine do you make use of for this sacrament? A, Wine of the grape, with which, by apostoli- cal tradition, we mingle a little water. ., Q. Has the practice of mingling water with wine been always observed from the Apostles' days? J[. It certainly has, and that throughout the whole Church: see St. Justin, Apolog. 2. St. Ire- nsDus, L. 5. c. 2. St. Cyprian, Epistola 63. ad Caecilium, dz;c. Q. Did Christ when he gave the cup to his dis- ciples mingle water with the wine? A. It is probable he did; though the scripture neither mentions the water nor the wine; but only speaks of his giving them the cup: however, the ancient and universal practice of the Church, in all probability, comes originally from the exaniple of Christ. Q. Is there not some mystery or secret mean- 8* 90 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. ing in the mingling the water with the wine in the chalice? A, Yes, it represents to us, first, the union of the human and divine nature, in the person of the Son of God; secondly, the union of the faithful with Christ their head. Thirdly, the water and the blood that flowed fi;om the side of Christ. Q. Why did our Lord appoint bread and wino for the matter of this sacrament? A, First, because bread and wine being most nourishing to the body were the most proper to represent the grace of this sacrament, which is the food and nourishment of the soul. Secondly, be- cause bread and wine are both composed of many individuals, (viz. grains or grapes) made one by a perfect union of them all; and therefore, as the holy fathers take notice, are, a most proper type or symbol of Christ's mystical body the Church, and of that unity which our Lord would recom- mend to the faithful by this sacrament. Accord- ing to that of St. Paul, 1 Cor. x. 17. 'We being many are one bread, and one body, for we are all partakers of that one bread.' Q. What other things are signified or repre- sented by the outward forms of bread and wine in this sacrament? A, They are chiefly designed to signify or re- present to us three things; the one now past, viz. the passion of Christ, of which they are the re- membrance: another really present, viz. the body and blood of Christ, of which they are the veil: a third to come, viz. everlasting life, of which they are the pledge. I CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 91 SECTION VI. OF COMMUNION IN ONE KIND. Q. Why do not the faithful in the Catholic Church receive under the form of wine, as well as under the form of bread? A. The Catholic Church has always looked up- on it to be a thing indifferent, whether the faithful receive in one kind or in both; because she has always believed that they receive Jesus Christ himself the fountain of all grace, as itiuch in one kind as in both: but her custom and discipline for many ages have been to administer this sacrament to the laity only in one kind, viz. under the form of bread, by reason of the danger of spilling the blood of Christ, if all were to receive the cup; which discipline was confirmed by the general Council of Constance in opposition to the Hussites, who had the rashness to condemn in this point, the practice of the universal Church. Q. Did the Catholic Church never allow of the communion in both kinds? A She did, and may again, if she pleases; for this is a matter of discipline, which the Church may regulate oi' alter, as she shall see most expe- dient for the good of her children. Q. What do you mean, when you say, this is a matter of discipline; I thought communion of one kind had been looked upon in the Catholic Church as a matter of faith? A. You must distinguish in this case between that which is of faith, and that which is of discip- line only. It is a matter of faith, that under one kind we receive Christ whole and entire, and the true sacrament; and that there is no command of mimM M' ^ 92 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. Christ for all the faithful to receive in both kinds, so far both is and ever was the faith of the Catho- lic Church; for her faith is unalterable. But then, whether the blessed sacrament should actually be administered to the laity in one kind or in both, that is to say, what is most proper or expedient for the Church to practice or ordain in this particular, considering the circumstances of time, place, &c. this is what I call a matter of discipline, which may be different in different ages, without any alteration of the faith of the Church. Q. But did not Christ command the receiving in both kinds, St. Matt. xxvi. 27. 'Drink ye all of it?' A. These words were addressed to the twelve Apostles, who were all that were then present; and the precept was by them all fulfilled; 'And they all drank of it.' St. Mark xiv. 23. Now it is certain, that many things were spoken in the gospel to, the Apostles, in quality of pastors of the Church, which were not directed to the laity; as when they were commissioned to preach and baptize, St. Matt, xxviii. 19, 20. and to absolve sinners, St. John xx. 22. and upon this very occasion to do what Christ had done; that is, to consecrate and administer this sacrament in remembrance of him, St. Luke xxii. 19. And consequently, it is no argument that all are obliged to drink of the cup, because Christ commanded all the Apostles to drink of it; no more than that all are obliged to consecrate the sacra- ment, because Christ commanded all the Apostles to do it. For both these commands were delivered at the same time, upon the same occasion, Wid to the same persons. Q. But why should the Apostles, and thei/ suc- cessors, the bishops and priests of the Chui'ch, be commanded to drink of the cup rather than the CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 93 laity? Or why should Christ, at the first institu- tion of this sacrament, consecrate and give it in both kinds, if all Christians were not always to receive it in both kinds? A, To satisfy both these queries at once, you are to take notice that the blessed eucharist, ac- cording to the faith of the Catholic Church, and as we shall show hereafter, is a sacrifice as well as a sacrament; and of this sacrifice, by the institu- tion of Christ, the Apostles and their successors, the bishops and priests of the Church, are the ministers, whom he has commanded to offer it in remembrance of his death, St. Luke xxii. 19. Now this sacrifice in remembrance of Christ's death, for the more lively representing the separa- tion of Christ's blood from his body, requires the separate consecration of both kinds, and therefore the priests, that are the ministers of this sacrifice, receive at that time in both kinds; and Christ, in the first institution of this sacrifice, consecrated and gave both kinds, designing without doubt that it should be so received, at least by the ministers. Q. But why should not the nature of the sacra- ment as much require both kinds to be received by all, as' the nature of the sacrifice requires both kinds to be consecrated? A. Because the nature of the sacrament consists in being the sign and cause of grace; now under either kind there is both a sufficient sign of grace, viz. of the nourishment of the soul, and at the same time the fountain and cause of all grace, by the real presence of Christ, in whom are locked up all the treasures of grace; so that the nature of the sacrament sufficiently subsists in either kind. But the nature of the sacrifice particularly requires the exhibiting to God, the body and blood of hia mmh fl'.ff 94 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. Son, under the veils that represent the shedding of his blood, and his death; and therefore, the nature of the sacrifice requires the separate conse- cration of both kinds; which, being consecrated, most be received by some one, and by no one more properly than by the minister. Q. Does not Christ say, St. John vi. 63. 'Except ye eat of the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye shall not have life in you.' A. He does: and in the same chapter, ver. 67, 58, he tells us, ' He that eateth me, even he shall live by me; and, he that eateth of this bread, shall live for ever?' Which texts are easily reconciled, if we consider, that according to the Catholic doc- trine, and according to the truth, whosoever re- ceives the body of Christ, most certainly receives his blood at the same time; since the body, which he receives, is a living body, (for Christ can die no more, Rom. vi. 9.) which cannot be without the blood. There is no taking Christ by pieces; who- ever receives him, receives him whole. Q. But, are not the faithful deprived of a great part of the grace of this sacrament, by receiving only in one kind. A, No: because the grace of this sacramen* being annexed to the real presence of Christ, who is the fountain of all grace; and Christ being as truly and really present in one kind as in both, consequently he brings with him the same grace to the soul, when received in one kind, as he does when received in both. Q. Is it not then a privilege, granted to the priests above the laity, to receive in both kinds? f A, No: their receiving in both kinds, as often as they say Mass, is no privilege, but the consequence of the sacrifice which they have been offering, as CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 95 you may gather from what I have told you al- ready: for, as for other times, when they are not saying Mass, no priest, bishop or pope, even upon his death-bed, ever receives otherwise than in one kind. Q. Have you any thing more to add in favour of communion in one kind? A. Yes; first, that the scripture in many places, speaking of the holy communion, makes no men- tion of the cup. See St. Luke xxiv. 30, 31; Acts ii. 42, 46. XX. 7; 1 Cor. x. 17. Secondly, that the scripture promises life eternal to them that receive in one kind, St. John vi. 51, 67, 58. Thirdly, that te ancient church most certainly allowed of com- munion in one kind, and practised it on many occa- sions. See Tertullian. L. 2. ad Uxorem, c. 5; St. Denis of Alexandria, Epist. ad Fabium Antioch, recorded by Eusebius, L. 6. Histor. c. 34; St. Cy- prian, L. de Lapsis; St. Basil, Epist. 269; St. Am- brose de Satyro Fratre. Paulinus in Vita Ambrosii, &c. Fourthly, that many learned Protestants have acknowledged, that there is no command in scrip- ture for all to receive in both kinds. See Luther, in his epistle to the Bohemians; Spalatensis de Rep. Eccles. L. 5. c. 6; Bishop Forbes, L. 2. de Eu- charist, c. 1, 2; White, bishop of Ely, Treatise on the Sabbath, p. 79; Bishop Montagu, Orig. p. 79. Q. But what would you say further to a scrupu- lous soul, which, through the prejudice of a Pro- testant education, could not be perfectly easy upon the article? A, I should remit such a person to the church and her authority, and to all those divine promises recorded in scripture, by which we are assured, that in hearing the church and her pastors, we are secure; that Christ and his holy Spirit shall be HitoHiitfMiMMiilHMMMMiiili 96 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. always with them, to guide them into all truth and that the gates of hell shall never prevail against this authority. So that a christian soul has nothing to fear, in conforming herself to the authority and practice of the church of God; but very much in pretending to be wiser than the Church, or making a scruple to hear and obey hei spiritual guides. SECTION VII. of the manner of adbiinistering this blessed sacrament: of devotion before and after communion: of the obligations of receiving it; and of its effects. Q. In what manner is the blessed Eucharist administered to the people? A, After the communion of the priest in the Mass, such of the people as are to communicate, go up to the rail before the altar, and there kneel down; and taking the towel, hold it before their breasts, in such manner, that if in communicating, it should happen that any particle should fall, it may not fall to the ground, but be received upon the towel. Then the clerk, in the name of all the communicants, says the Confiteor, or the general form of confession, by v/hich they accuse them- selves of all their sins to God, to the whole court of heaven, and beg the prayers and intercession of all the triumphant and militant church. After which the priest, turning towards the communi- cants, says, ' May the Almighty God have mercy on you, and forgive you your sins, and bring you to ever- lasting life. Amen.' CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTROCTED. 97 *May the Almighty and merciful Lord grant you pardon, absolution, and remission of all your sins. Amen.' Then the priest taking the particles of the bless- ed sacrament, which are designed for the commu- nicants, and holding one of them which he elevate* a little over the pix or paten, pronounces the following words: ' Ecce Agnus Dei, <^c.' that is, * Behold the Lamb of God: behold him who taketh away the sins of the world.' Then he repeats three times, Domlne non sum dignus, SfC? that is, *Lord! I am not worthy that thou shouldst enter under my roof; speak but only the word, and my soul shall be healed.' After which he distributes the holy communion, inaking the sign of the cross with the consecrated particle upon each one, and saying to each one, ' Corpus Domini nostri, SfC? 'The body of our Lord Jesus Christ preserve thy soul unto life everlasting. Amen.' Q. In what manner is the blessed sacrament administered to the sick? A, The catholic church has always practised the reserving some consecrated particles of the blessed eucharist for communicating the sick; and where she enjoys free exercise of religion, takes care that this blessed sacrament be carried to them with a religious solemnity, attended with lights, &c. When the priest comes into the chamber where the sick person lies, he says, ' Peace be to this house.' Answ. 'iVnd to all that dwell therein,' Then setting down the ^pix with the blessed sacra- ment upon the table, which must be covered with a clean linen cloth, he takes holy water and sprin- kles the sick person and the chamber, saying, ^Aspergcs, &c.' 'Thou shalt sprinkle me, O Lord! with hyssop, and I shall be cleansed: thou shalt 9 ^^:f^ 98 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. wash me, and I shall be made whiter than snow.' Psal. 1. 'Have mercy on me, O God! according to thy great mercy. Glory be to the Father, &c.' Then he again repeats the Anthem, ' Thou shalt sprinkle me, &c.' After which he adds, ' Our help is in the name of the Lord.' Answ. 'Who . made heaven and earth.' Priest. 'O Lord! hear my prayer.' Answ. ' And let my cry come unto thee.' Priest. 'The Lord be with you.' Answ. ' And with thy spirit.' Priest. * Let us pray.' The Prayer. O holy Lord, Almighty Father, everlasting God! graciously hear us; and vouchsafe to send thy holy angel from heaven, to guard, to cherish, protect, visit and defend all that dwell in this habitation, through Christ our Lord. Amen. Then the priest coming to the sick person, en- deavours to dispose him, and prepare him for re- ceiving the blessed sacrament; and, if he has any sin upon his conscience, hears his confession, and absolves him. After which the sick person, or some other in his name, says the Confiteor; and the priest says, 'May the Almighty God have mercy on thee, &;c.;' as above. 'Behold the Lamb of God, &c.' 'Lord! I am not worthy, &c.' And in giving the blessed sacrament, if it be by the way of Viaticum, or preparation for death, he says, 'Receive, brother! (or sister!) the Viaticum of the body of our Lord Jesus Christ, who may guard thee from the wicked enemy, and bring thee ^^o everlasting life. Amen.' But if the sick person be not in danger of death, the priest, in giving the blessed sacrament, pronounces the usual form; 'May the body of our Lord Jesus Christ preserve thy soul to life everlasting. Amen.' CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 99 After which the priest says the following prayer: O holy Lord, Almighty Father, eternal God! we beseech thee with faith, that the sacred body of our Lord Jesus Christ thy Son may be available to this our brother (or sister) that he has received it as a medicine to eternity, both for body and soul; through the same Lord Jesus Christ thy Son, who liveth and reigneth with thee in the unity of the Holy Ghost, for ever and ever. Amen. Then, if there remain in the pix any other par- ticles of the blessed sacrament, the priest gives the benedicton therewith to the sick person: otherwise he pronounces the usual blessing, making the sign of the cross, and saying, 'May the blessing of Almighty God, the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Ghost descend upon thee, and remain always with thee. Amen.' Q. In what disposition of soul is a person ob- liged to be, in order to receive worthily the blessed sacrament? A. He is obliged to be in the state of grace, and free at least from the guilt of mortal sin; that is to say, from the guilt of any wilful transgression in any matter of weight, of the commandments of God, or his church. The reason of this is, be- cause a soul that is under the guilt of mortal sin is an enemy to God, and a slave to the devil; and therefore it would be a grievous crime for a soul in that state to presume to receive the body and blood of Christ, which, according to the docti^e of St. Paul, would be receiving damnation to herself. Q. What then is a person to do in order to prevent so great an evil? A, St. Paul tells you, 1 Cor. xi. 28. that he is to *try himself;' that is, to search and examine dill- 100 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. gently his own conscience before he ventures to approach to this blessed sacrament. Q. And what, if upon examination, he finds his conscience charged with any weighty matter? A, He must take care to discharge it, in the manner that Christ has appointed, viz. by a hearty epentance and sincere confession; laying open the tate of his soul to those sacred judges to whom Christ said, St. John xx. 23. ' Whose sins you shall forgive, they are forgiven; and whose sins you «hall retain, they are retained.' Q. What else is required of a person that is to receive the blessed sacrament? A, He must be fasting, at least from midnight; far so the church commands, agreeable to a most an- cient and apostolical tradition. So that if through inadvertence a person has taken any thing, though it were no more than one drop or crumb, aft«r twelve o'clock at night, he must by no means re- ceive that day; it would be a crime to attempt it. Q. Is there no exception from this rule? A, Yes, the case of danger of approaching death is excepted; for then persons are permitted to re- ceive the blessed sacrament by way of Viaticum, though they are not fasting. Q. What kind of devotion do you recommend to a christian that is preparing himself for the holy communion? A, Besides his clearing his conscience from sin by a good confession, I recommend to him, first, to thinl^^well on the great work he has in hand, to consider attentively who he is, and who it is that he is preparing to receive, and earnestly to beg of God to make him worthy. Secondly, to propose to himself a pure intention, viz. the honour of God, and the health of his own soul, and in parti- CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 101 cular, that by worthily receiving Christ he may come to a happy union with, him, according to that of St. John vi. 56. 'He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I in him.' Thirdly, to meditate on the sufferings and death of his Redeemer, in compliance with that command of our Lord, St. Luke xxii. 19. 'Do this in remembrance of me.' Fourthly, to prepare himself by acts of virtue, more especially of faith, love and humility ; that so he may approach to his Lord with a firm belief of his real presence in this sacrament, and of his death and passion ; with an ardent affection of love to him who has so much loved us, and with a great sentiment of his own unworthiness and sins, joined with a firm con- fidence in the mercies of his Redeemer. Q. What ought to be a christian's behaviour at the time of receiving this blessed sacrament? A. As to the interior, he ought to have his soul at that time full of the sentiments we have just now mentioned of faith, love and humility. And as to the exterior, he ought to have his head erect, his eyes modestly cast down, his mouth moderate- ly upon, and his tongue a little advanced on his under-lip, that so the priest may conveniently put the sacred host on his tongue, which he must gently convey into his mouth, and after having moistened it for a moment or two on his tongue, swallow it as soon as he can, in all which he is carefully to avoid, first, the putting his mouth to the towel; secondly, the chewing with his teeth, or raising the host to the roof of his mouth; thirdly, the letting the sacred particle quite dissolve in his mouth; fourthly, the spitting soon after commu- nion. But if the particle should happen to stick to the roof of his mouth, let him not be disturbed, 9* 102 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. nor put his finger in his mouth to remove it; bill gently remove it with his tongue as soon as he can, and so convey it down. Q. What devotion do you recommend after com- munion ? A, First, adoration, praise and thanksgiving, in order to welcome our dear Saviour upon his com- ing under our roof. Here then let the soul cast her- self at the feet of her Lord : let her, like Magdalen, wash them in spirit with her tears; or, if she dares presume so high, let her embrace him with the spouse in the Canticles, and say, 'I have found him whom my soul loves; I will hold him, and shall not let him go.' Let her, like the royal pro- phet, invite all heaven and earth to join with her in praising her Lord; and let her excite all her powers to welcome him. Secondly, I recommend to the devout communicant to make a present or offering to Christ, in return for his having given himself. The present that he expects is our heart and soul, which, with all its faculties, ought on this occasion to be offered and consecrated to our Lord. Thirdly, at this time the soul ought to lay all her necessities before her Redeemer, and not neglect so favourable a conjuncture of sueing for his mercy and grace, both for herself and the whole world; for those more especially whom she is in particular obliged to pray for: and above all things let her pray, that nothing in life or death may ever separate her from the love of him whom she has here received, and chosen for her Lord and spouse for ever. Q. What do you think of those that spend lit- tle or no time in recollection and devotion after communion? A. I think they put an affront upon Christ in so CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 103 quickly turning their backs upon him; and that they wrong their own souls, which by this neglect are robbed of those graces and comforts which they would have received if they had staid in his company. Q, Have you any thing more to recommend after communion? A, I have this to recommend with regard to the whole following day, that a person take care to be more than ordinarily recollected, and vefi-y much upon his guard against the snares of the enemy, who is never more busy than upon this occasion to fiing some temptation or provocation in a Chris- tian's way, by which he may disturb the soul, and rob her of the treasure which she has received; and therefore it behoves Christians to be cautious against this wicked enemy and all his stratagems, lest by putting us into a passion, or otherwise drawing us into sin, he quickly put Christ out of our souls. If you desire to be more perfectly instructed in what relates to this blessed sacrament, and the devotion that is proper before and after commu- nion, I refer you to Father Lewis de Granada's Memorial of a Christian life, book III. Dr. Go- binet's second volume of the Instruction of Youth; or Mr. Gother's little book of Instructions and Devotions for Confession and Communion. Q. Are all Christians that are come to the years of discretion, under an obligation of receiving this sacrament? A, They certainly are, first, by a divine pre- cept or commandment of Christ, St. John vi. 64. * Except you eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, you shall not have life in you.' Which precept obliges to the receiving sometimes 4i 104 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. at least in our life, and at our death. Secondly, by a precept or commandment of the church pub- lished in the great council of Lateran, anno 1215: by which all the faithful are obliged to receive at least once a year, and that within the Easter-time, (which begins on Palm-Sunday and lasts till Low- Sunday) except the person, by the advice of his pastor, should, for some just reason be permitted to put off his communion till another time. Q. What is the penalty imposed by this council on such as neglect their Easter communion? A. The council orders, that such offenders should be excluded the church, and, if they die in this transgression, be deprived of Christian burial. Q. Are persons then actually excommunicated that neglect their Easter communion? A. No, they are not, till superiors pronounce the sentence of excommunication against them: because the council does not actually inflict this penalty, but only orders or authorizes the inflicting of it. Q. If a person has passed by the time of Easter, or was hindered from communicating at that time, is he obliged to communicate afterwards, as soon as he can? A. Yes he is; at least if you speak of one that has been a whole year without communicating; for the church-precept obliges to the receiving at least once a year. For the same reason, a person that has not been at communion within a year, and foresees that he shall be hindered at Easter, ought to anticipate Paschal communion, by receiving be- forehand. Q. And what if a person has made a sacrilegiou. communion at Easter, has such a one satisfied the precept of the church? A, No certainly. (See the 55th proposition con- CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 106 lemned by Innocent XI.) And therefore such a ♦ne remains obliged to communion, in the same .ftianner as if he had not communicated at all. Q, At what age are christians obliged by the precept of the church to communicate? A. As soon as they come to the years of discre- tion, as it is expressed in the council of Lateran: that is, when they have that perfect use of reason, and are so well instructed in their duty as to be able to discern the body of the Lord, and to receive it with due reverence and devotion. Now this hap- pens in some earlier, in others later: but seldom earlier than about ten years of age, Q. But what if a child, that is between seven and ten years of age, should be in evident danger of death? A. Many divines are of opinion, if such a one be come to the use of reason (which is commonly presumed after seven years of age) that he may, ©r even ought to receive, because of the com- mand of Christ, St. John vi. 64. So Saurez, Na- varrus, &;a Q. What are the effects of this blessed sacra- ment in the worthy receivers? A. It is the food, nourishment, strength and life of the soul, by supplying it with sanctifying grace, by repairing its forces, by arming it against its passions and concupisciences, by maintaining it at present in the life of grace, and bringing it to life and glory everlasting; according to that of St. John vi. 61. ^ The bread that I will give is my flesh, for the life of the world;' and ver. 68 *He that eateth of this bread, shall live for ever.' ii 106 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. SECTION VIII. OF THE WORSHIP OF CHRIST IN THIS SACRAMENT: WHERE ALSO OF BENEDICTIONS AND PROCESSIONS. Q. What kind of honour is due to this blessed sacrament? A. Divine honour and adoration, inasmuch as it contains truly and really the divine Person of Jesus Christ, the Son of God; who, as he is truly God, ought most certainly to be adored, wherever he is. Q. Is there no danger of idolatry in this practice? A, No certainly; because this honour is not paid to the outward veil, or the sacramental signs, but to Jesus Christ, who lies hidden there: now Jesus Christ is no idol, but the true and living God. Q. But if the doctrine of the real presence and transubstantiation should not be truo, should we not then at least be guilty of idolatry? A. We are as positively certain, by divine faith, of the truth of the doctrine of the real presence, and of transubstantiation, as Protestants can be of the divinity of Jesus Christ; and therefore we are as much out of the reach of the danger of idolatry, in worshipping Christ in this sacrament, as they are in worshipping him in heaven. I shall add, for their further satisfaction, that some of their best divines have discharged us from all danger of idolatry in worshipping Christ in this sacrament; as they may find in Dr. Jeremy Taylor's Liberty of Prophesying, sect. 20. numb. 26. and Mr, Thorn- dike's Just Weights and Measures, c. 19.. p. 125. Dr. Taylor's words on this subject deserve to be remarked. He writes as follow, " Idolatry is a forsaking the true God, and giving divine worship CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 107 ^ a creature, or to an idol; that is, to an ima- /inary God. — Now it is evident that the object of heir (the Catholics) adoration, in the blessed sa- irament, is the only true and eternal God, hypo- statically joined with his holy humanity, which Humanity they believe actually present, under the veil of the sacramental signs. And if they thought nim not present, they are so far from worshipping the bread in this case, that themselves profess it idolatry to do so. Which is a demonstration that the soul has nothing in it that is idolatrical; the will has nothing in it but what is a great enemy to to idolatry; and nothing burns in hell but proper will." So far this learned Protestant prelate. Q. Why does the Catholic church reserve the blessed sacrament in her churches? A, She reserves the blessed sacrament in taber- nacles, upon her altars, partly that she may have it there to carry to the sick at all hours, whenever they shall be in need of it; and partly for the com- fort of her children, who by this means have Jesus Christ always amongst them, and may come when they please to visit him. This custom, of reserv- ing the blessed sacrament, is as ancient as Chris tianity, as appears from the most* certain monu- ments of antiquity. And it is upon account of the blessed sacrament, reserved in the tabernacle, that a lamp hangs before the altar to burn there day and night, and that we kneel a^ often we pass before the tabernacle. Q. Why is the blessed sacrament, upon certain days, exposed to the view of the people in a re- monstrance set up upon the altar? * Tertullian 1. 2. ad Uxorem c. 5. St. Cyprian, 1. do Lapsie, &,c. 108 CATHOLIC CHKISTIAN INSTRUCTED. A. It is to invite the people to come there to adore Jesus Christ, and to excite in them a greater devotion by the sight of their Lord, veiled in these sacred mysteries. Q. What is the meaning of the benediction given on certain days? A. It is a devotion practised by the church, in order to give adoration, praise and thanksgiving to God, for his infinite goodness and love, testified to us in the institution of this blessed sacrament, and to receive at the same time the benediction or blessing of our Lord there present. Q. Why is the blessed sacrament sometimes carried in solemn procession through the streets? A. To honour our Lord there present with a kind of triumph, and thereby to make him some sort of amends for the injuries and affronts v^hich are so frequently offered to this divine sacrament; and to obtain his blessing for all those places through which he passes. CHAPTER VI. OF THE SACRIFICE OF THE MASS, Q. What do you mean by the Mass? A. The Mass is the liturgy of the Catholic church, and consists in the consecration of the bread and wine into the body and blood of Christ, and the offering up of this same body and blood to God, by the ministry of the priest, for a perpetual memorial of Christ's sacrifice upon the cross, and a continuation of the same till the end of the world. Q. Why is this liturgy called the Mass? A, Some think this word is derived from the Hebrew word missach, Deut. xvi. which signifies a CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 109 voluntary offering; others are of opinion, that it is derived from the missa, or missio, that is, from the dismission of the catechmens and others, who were not permitted anciently to be present at this sacri- fice. But be this as it will, the name is of very ancient use in the church, as appears from St. Am- brose, 1. 2. Epist. 14. ad Sororem; St. Leo, Epist. 81. ad Dioscorum; and St. Gregory, Horn. 6. in Evangelia. Q. Is the Mass properly a sacrifice? A. Yes it is. Q. What do you mean by a sacrifice ? A, A sacrifice, properly so called, is an oblation or offering of some sensible thing made to God by a lawful minister, to acknowledge, by the destruc- tion or other change in the thing offered the sove- reign power of God, and to render him the hom- age due to his supreme majesty. Q. How then is the Mass a sacrifice ? A, Because it is an oblation of the body and blood of Jesus Christ, offered under the outward and sensible signs of bread and wine to God, by the ministry of the priests of the church, lawfully consecrated and empowered by Christ; and this oblation is accompanied with a real change and destruction of the bread and wine, by the conse- cration of them into the body and blood of Christ, and a real exhibiting of Christ our victim, hereto- fore immolated upon the cross, and here mystically dying in the separate consecration of the two dif- ferent species; and this oblation is made to God to acknowledge his sovereign power, to render him our homage, and for all the other ends for which sacrifice is offered to his divine majesty. Q. What are the ends for which sacrifice of old was offered, and is still to be offered to God? 10 110 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. A, For these four ends; first, for God's own honour and glory, by acknowledging his sove reignty and paying him our homage; secondly, to give God thanks for all his blessings; thirdly, to beg pardon for our sins; fourthly, to obtain grace and blessings from his divine majesty. Q. Have the servants of God, from the begin- ning of the world, been always accustomed to hon- our him with sacrifices? A, Yes they have. Witness the sacrifice of Abel, Gen. iv. the sacrifice of Noah, Gen. viii. the sacrifice of Melchisedech, Gen. xiv. the sacrifices of Abraham, Gen. xv. and xxii. the sacrifices of Job, ch. i. and xlii. and the many different kind of sacrifices prescribed in the law of Moses. Of these ancient sacrifices some were holocausts, or whole burnt-offerings, in which the victim or host was wholly consumed by fire, and thereby given fully to God without reserve for the more perfect acknowledgment of his sovereignty. Others were sin-offerings or sacrifices offered for sin: others were pacific or peace-offerings; and these were either offered in thanksgiving for blessings re- e place, and from St. Matt, xviii. 18. CHAPTER X. OF INDULGENCES AND JUBILEES. Q. What do you mean by indulgences? A. There is not any part of the doctrine of the Catholic Church that is more grossly misrepre- sented by our adversaries than this of indulgences, for the generality of Protestants imagine, that an indulgence is a leave to commit sin, or at least, 14 158 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. that it is a pardon for sins lo come; whereas, ir deed, it is no such thing. There is no such powe* in heaven or earth that can give leave to commit sin; and consequently there is no giving pardon beforehand for sins to come. All this is far from the belief and practice of the Catholic Church. By an indulgence, therefore, we mean no more than a releasing to true penitents the debt of tem- poral punishment, which remained due to their sins, after the sins themselves, as to the guilt and eternal punishment, had been already remitted by the sacrament of penance, or by perfect contrition. Q. Be pleased to explain this a little farther? A. That you may understand this the better, take notice, that in sin there are two things; there is the guilt of the sin, and there is the debt of the punishment due to God upon account of the sin. Now upon the sinner's repentance and confession, the sin is remitted as to the guilt, and likewise as to the eternal punishment in hell, due to every mortal sin,; but the repentance and conversion are seldom so perfect as to release the sinner from all debt of temporal punishment due to God's justice, which the penitent must either discharge by the way of satisfaction .' ' penance; or, if he be defi- cient therein, he n / . expect to suffer hereafter, in proportion to this debt which he owes to the divine Majesty. Nt)w an indulgence, when duly obtained, is a release from this debt of temporal punishment. Q, liow do you prove, that after the guilt of sin and the eternal punishment have been remitted, there remains oftentimes a debt of temporal pun- ishment due to the divine Justice? A. I prove it, first, from scripture; where to omit other instances, we find in the case of David, CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 159 2 Sam. xii. that although upon his repentance the prophet Nathan assured him, v. 13. that the Lord hath put away his sin, yet he denounced unto him many temporal punishments, which should be in- flicted by reason of this sin: which accordingly after ensued. See v. 10, 11, 12, 13. Secondly, I prove it from the perpetual practice of the Church of God, of enjoining penances to the repenting sin- ners, in order to cancel this punishment due to their sins. Q. How do you prove, that the Church has received a power from Christ of discharging a penitent sinner from this debt of temporal punish- ment, which remains due upon account of his sins? A. I prove it by that promise of our Lord made to St. Peter, St. Matt. xvi. 19. 'I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and what- soever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.' Which promise, made without any exception, reservation or limitation, must needs imply a power of loosing or releasing all such bonds as might likewise, hinder or retard a Christian soul from entering heaven. Q. Did the primitive Church ever practise any ;hing of this nature? A, Yes, very frequently, in discharging peni tents, when there appeared just cause for it, from a great part of the penance due to their sins as may be seen in Tertullian, St. Cyprian, and other ancient monuments: and of this nature, was what St. Paul himself practised in forgiving, as he says, 2 Cor. ii. 10. in the person of Christ — that is, by the power and authority received from him, — the incestuous Corinthian, without waiting his going through a longer course of penance. 160 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. Q. But were these primitive indulgences under- stood to release the punishment due to sin in the sight of God, or only that which was enjoined in the Church in her penitential canons? A, Both one and the other, as often as they were granted upon a just cause: according to what our Lord has promised St. Matt, xviii. 18. 'Verily I say upon you, whatsoever you shall bind on earth, shall be bound in heaven, and whatsoever you shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.' Q. What conditions are necessary for the valid- ity of an indulgence? A. First, on the part of him that grants the in- dulgence, besides sufficient authority, il is neces- sary that there be a just cause or motive for the grant; for, according to the common doctrine of the best divines, indulgences, granted without cause, will not be ratified by Almighty God. Secondly, on the part of him that is to obtain the indulgence, it is requisite that he duly perform the conditions prescribed, such as going to confession and com- munion, fasting, alms, prayers, &c. and that he be in the state of grace; for it is in vain to expect the remission of the punishment due to sin, whilst a person continues in the guilt of mortal sin. Q. Does the indulgence so far remit all tem- poral punishment, as to free a penitent from all obligation of doing penance for his sins? A, No: for the obligation of doing penance for sin, and leading a penitential life, is an indispen- sable duty. Hence the Church usually enjoins peni- tential works, in order for the obtaining of indul- gences. And the opinion of the learned Cajetan and others is highly probable, that one condition for attaining to the benefit of an indulgence, in the release of the punishment of the next life, is a dis- CATHOLIC CIIKISTIAN INSTRUCTED. , 161 position to do penance in this life ; for the treasure of the Church, out of which indulgences are grant- ed, is intended by our great master for the relief of the indigent; yet not so as to encourage the lazy, who refuse to labour at all for themselves. Q. Are you then of opinion, that a Christian receives no farther benefit by an indulgence, than he would do by the penitential works which he performs for the obtaining of that indulgence? A. 1 am far from being of that opinion; for, according to that way of thinking, no benefit would be reaped from the indulgence, but only from the works performed for the obtaining of it: whereas, the Church of God has declared in the Council of Trent, that 'Indulgences are very wholesome to Christian people.' Sess. 25. But what many di- vines maintain is, that regularly speaking, there is required, though not an equality, yet some propor- tion at least between the works to be done for the obtaining of an indulgence, and the indulgence itself: and this I believe to be true. See Soto in 4tum. Dist. 12. Q. 2. Art. 2. and Sylvius in Sup. Q, 25. Art. 2. Qusesito 2. Conclus. 5. Q. What is meant by the treasure of the Church, out of which indulgences are said to be granted? A. The treasure of the Church, according to divines, are the merits and satisfaction of Christ and his saints, out of which the Church, when she grants an indulgence to her children, offers to'God an equivalent for the punishment which was due to the divine Justice. For the merits and satisfac- tion of Christ are of infinite value, and never to be exhausted, and the source of all our good: and as the merits and satisfactions of the saints have their value from Christ, and through him are ac- cepted by the Father, so by the communion, which 14* 162 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. all the members of Christ's mystical body have one with another, they are applicable to the faith- ful upon earth. Q. What is meant by a plenary indulgence? A. That which, when duly obtained, releases the whole punishment that remained due upon account of past sins. Q. What is meant by an indulgence of seven years, or of forty days? A, By an indulgence of so many years or days is meant the remission of the penance of so many years or days, and consequently of the punishment corresponding to the sins, which, by the canons of the Church, would have required so many years or days of penance, Bellarmin, I. 1. de Indulg. c. 9. And thus, if it be true, that there ever were any grants of indulgence of a thousand years or more, they are to be understood with relation to the pun- ishment corresponding to the sins, which accord- ing to the penitential canons would have required a thousand or more years of penance. For since, by these canons, seven or ten years of penance were usually assigned for one mortal sin of lust, perjury, &;c. it follows, that habitual sinners, accord- ing to the rigour of the canons, must have been liable to great numbers of years of penancce, and perhaps some thousands of years. And though they could not be expected to live so long as to fulfil this penance; yet, as by their sins they had incurred a debt of punishment proportionable to so long a time of penance, these indulgences of so many years, if ever granted, (which some call in question) wero designed to release them from the debt. Q. What is the meaning of indulgences for the dead? A' They are not granted by way of absolution, Ji CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 1G3 since the pastors of the Church have not that juris- diction over the dead : but they are only available to the faithful departed, by way of suffrage, or spiritual succour applied to their souls out of^ the treasure of the Church. Q. What is the meaning of a jubilee? A, A jubilee, so called from the resjemblance it bears with the jubilee-year in the old law, Levit. XXV. and xxvii. (which was a year of remission, in which bondsmen were restored to liberty, and every one returned to his possession) is a plenary indulgence granted every twenty-fifth year, as also upon other extraordinary occasions, to such as, being truly penitent, shall wt)rthily receive the blessed sacrament, and perform the other condi- tions of fasting, alms and prayer, usually pre- scribed at such times. Q. What then is the difference betwixt a jubilee and any other plenary indulgence? A. A jubilee is more solemn, and accompanied with certain privileges, not usually granted upon other occasions, with regard to the being absolved by any approved confessor from all excommunica- tions and other reserved cases, and having vows exchanged into the perfoi;^mance of other works of piety. To which we may add, that as a jubilee is extended to the whole Church, which at that time joins as it were in a body in offering a holy vio- lence to heaven by prayers and penitential works; and as the cause for granting an indulgence at such times is usually more evident, and more or greater works of piety are prescribed for the ob- taining it, the indulgence of consequence is likely to be much more certain and secure. Q. What are the fruits which usually are seen amongst Catholics at the time of a jubilee? 164 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. A. As at that time the Church most pressingly invites all sinn-ers to return to God with their whole hearts, and encourages them by setting open her spiritual treasure in their favour, so the most usual effects of a jubilee are the conversions of great numbers of sinners, and the multiplying of all sorts of good works amongst the faithful. So far it is from being true, that indulgences are an encouragement to sin, or an occasion of a neglect ef good works, as our .adversaries unjustly object. CHAPTER XL OF THE SACRAMENT OF EXTREME UNCTION. Q. What do you mean by extreme unction? A. I mean the anointing of the sick, prescribed, St. James v. 14, 15. 'Is any one sick among you, let him call for the priests of the Church, and let them pray over him, anointing him with oil in the name of the Lord: and the prayer of faith shall save the sick man, and the Lord shall ease him: and if he be in sins, they shall be forgiven him.' Q. How do you prove that this anointing of the sick is a sacrament? A. Because it is the outward sign of an inward grace, or a divine ordinance, to which is annexed a promise of grace in God''s holy word. The anointing, together with the prayers that accom- pany it, are the outward sign: the ordinance of God is found in the words of St. James above quoted: the inward grace is promised in the same place, 'The prayer of faith shall save the sick man — and if he be in sins, they shall be forgiven him.' Q. How do you prove that this ordinance was i CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 165 designed for all ages, and not only for the time of the Apostles/' A, Because the words of the scriptures in which this ordinance is contained, are no way limited to the Apostles' time, no more than the words of the ordinance of baptism, St. Matt, xxviii. and because the Church of God, the best interpreter of his words and ordinances, has practised it in all ages. Q. To what kind of people is the sacrament of extreme unction to be administered? A, To those who, after having come to the use of reason, are in danger of death by sickness; but not to children under the age of reason, nor to persons sentenced to death, &c. Q. Can the same person receive the sacrament of extreme unction more than once? A. Yes^ but not in the same illness, except it should be of long continuance, and that the state of the sick man should be changed, so as to recover out of the danger, and then fall into the like case again. Q. What are the effects and fruits of the sacra- ment of extreme unction? A, First, it remits sins, at least such as are ve- nial, for mortal or deadly sins must be remitted, before receiving extreme unction, by the sacrament of penance and confession. Secondly, it heals the soul of her infirmity and weakness, and a certain propension to sin contracted by former sins, which are apt to remain in the soul, as the unhappy relics of sin; and it helps to remove something of the debt of punishment due to past sins. Thirdly, it imparls strength to the soul, to bear more easily the illness of the body, and arms her against the attempts of her spiritual enemies. Fourthly, if it be expedient for the good of the soul, it often re- stores the health of the body. 166 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. Q. What kind of oil is that which is made use of in the sacrament of extreme unction? A. Oil of Olives, solemnly blessed by the bishop every year on Maunday-Thursday. Q. What are the form and manner of administer- ing this sacrament? A. First, the priest, having instructed and dis ^posed the sick person to this sacrament, recites, if the time permit, certain prayers prescribed in the Ritual, to beg God's blessing upon the sick, and that his holy angels may defend them, that dwell in that habitation, from all evil. Secondly, is said the Confiteor, or general form of confession and absolution; and the priest exhorts all present to join in prayer for the person that is sick; and if opportunity permit, according to the quality ^or number of persons there present, to recite the Seven Penitential Psalms with the Litanies, or other prayers, upon this occasion. Thirdly, the priest, making three times the sign of the cross upon the sick person, at the name of the blessed Trinity, says, 'In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost, may all power of the devil be extinguished in thee, by the laying on of our hands, and the invocation of all the holy angels, arch-angels, patriarchs, prophets, apostles, martyrs, confessors, virgins and all the saints. Amen.' Fourthly, dipping his thumb in the holy oil, he anoints the sick person, in the form of the cross, upon the eyes, ears, nose, mouth, hands and feet; at each anointing making use of this form of prayer: 'Through this holy unction, and his own most tender mercy, may the Lord pardon thee whatever sins thou hast committed by thy sight. Amen.' And so of the hearing, and the rest, adapt- ing the form to the several senses. Fifthly, after CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 167 this the priest goes on: 'Lord have mercy on us, Christ have mercy on us. Lord have mercy on us. Our Father, &c. And lead us not into temp- tation. E, But deliver us from evil. F. Save ihy servant. M. Trusting in thee, O my God. V. Send him, O Lord, help from thy sanctuary. R. And do thou defend him from Sion. F. Be to him, O Lord, a tower of strength. R. From the face of the enemy. F. Let not the enemy have any power over him. R. Nor the son of iniquity be able to hurt him. F. Lord, hear my prayer. R. And let my cry come unto thee. F. The Lord be vith you. R. And with thy spirit.' Let us pray. O Lord God, who hast said by thy Apostle James; 'Is any one sick among you? Let him call for the priests of the Church, and let them pray over him, anointing him with oil in the name of the Lord; and the prayer of faith shall save the sick, and the Lord shall ease him; and if he be in sins they shall be remitted to him:' heal we beseech thee, O our Redeemer, by the grace of the Holy Ghost, the maladies of this sick man, cure his wounds, and forgive him his sins, and expel from him all pains of mind and body, and mercifully restore unto him perfect health, both as to the interior and exterior, that being recovered by thy mercy, he may return to his former duties. Who with the Father and the Holy Ghost, livest and reignest one God, for ever and ever. Amen. Let us pray. Look down, we beseech thee, O Lord, on thy servant N. fainting under the infirmity of his body, and refresh a soul which thou hast created. 168 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. that he, being improved by thy chastisements, may be saved by thy medicine. Through Christ our Lord. Amen. Let us pray. O holy Lord, Almighty Father, everlasting God! who, by imparting the grace of thy benediction to sick bodies, preservest, according to the multitude of thy mercies, the work of thy hands; favourably attend to the invocation of thy name, and deliver thy servant from his illness, and restoring him to health, raise him up by thy right hand, and strengthen him by thy virtue, defend him by thy power, and restore him with all desired prosperity to thy holy church. Through Christ our Lord. Amen. As to what belongs to the order of the visitation of the sick, and the prayera and devotions proper upon that occasion, as also the manner of assisting those that are dying, consult the Roman Ritual; out of which I shall present you with the following form of the recommendation of a departing soul. CHAPTER XII. THE ORDER OF THE RECOMBIENDATION OF A SOUL THAI IS JUST DEPARTING. Q. What is the form or order of the recommen- dation of a soul to God in its last passage? A, First, there is a short Litany recited, adapt- ed to that occasion; then the following prayers. Go forth, O Christian soul! from this world, in the name of God the Father Almighty, who created thee; in the name of Jesus Christ the Son of the living God, who suffered for thee; in the name of CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 169 the Holy Ghost, who sanctified thee; in the name of the argels and the archangels; in the name of the thrones and dominations; in the name of the principalities and powers; in the name of the cherubims and seraphims; in the name of the patriarchs and prophets; in the name of the holy Apostles and Evangelists; in the name of the holy martyrs and confessors; in the name of the holy monks and hermits; in the name of the holy vir- gins, and of all the saints of God : let thy place be this day in peace, and thy abode in the holy Sion, Through Christ our Lord. Amen. God most merciful ! O God most clement ! O God! who, according to the multitude of thy tender mercies, blottest out the sins of the penitent, and graciously remittest the guilt of their past offences; mercifully regard this thy servant N. and vouch- safe to hear him, who with the whole confession of his heart begs for the remission of all his sins. Kenew, O most merciful Father! whatever has been corrupted in him through human frailty, or vio- lated through the deceit of the enemy; and asso- ciate him as a member of redemption to the unity of the body of the church. Have compassion, O Lord! on his sighs; have compassion on his tears, and admit him, who has no hope but in thy mercy, to the sacrament of thy reconciliation. Through Christ our Lord. Amen. 1 recommend thee, dear brother, to the Almighty God, and commit thee to his care, whose creature thou art; that when thou shalt have paid the debt of all mankind by death, thou mayest return to thy Maker, who formed thee of the slime of the earth. When thy soul therefore shall depart from thy body, let the resplendent multitude of the an- 15 170 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. gels meet thee; let the triumphant army of the martyrs, clad in their white robes, conduct thee: let the glorious company of illustrious confessors encompass thee: let the choir of joyful virgins re- ceive thee: and mayest thou meet with a blessed repose in the bosom of the patriarchs: let Christ Jesus appear to thee with a mild and cheerful countenance, and order thee a place amongst those that are to stand before him for ever. Mayest thou never ktiow the horror of darkness, the gnash- ing in flames or racking torments. May the most wicked enemy, with all his evil spirits, be forced to give way: may he tremble at thy approach in the company of angels, and fly away into the vast chaos of eternal night. Let God arise, and his enemies be dispersed: and let them that hate him fly before his face: let them, like smoke, come to nothing, and as wax that melts before the fire, so let sinners perish in the sight of God, but may the just feast and rejoice in his sight. Let then all the legions of hell be confounded and put to shame, and may none of the ministers of satan dare to stop thee in thy way. May Christ deliver thee fro^) torments, who was crucified for thee. May Christ deliver thee from eternal death, who vouch- safed to die for thee. May Christ the Son of God place thee in the delightful garden of his Para- dise, and may he, the true Shepherd, number thee amongst his sheep. May he absolve thee from all thy sins, and place thee at his right-hand in the lot of his elect. Mayest thou see thy Redeemer face to face, and standing always in his presence, behold with joyful eyes the most clear truth. Mayest thou be placed amongst the companies of the blessed, and enjoy the sweetness of the con- templation of thy God for ever. Amen. CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 171 Receive thy servant, O Lord! into the place of salvation, which he hopes for from thy mercy S, Amen. Deliver, O Lord I the soul of thy servant from all the perils of hell, from pains and all tribula- tions. It, Amen. Deliver, O Lord! the soul of thy servant, as thou deliveredest Enoch and Elias from the com- mon death of the world. E. Amen. Deliver, O Lord! the soul of thy servant, as thou deliveredest Noah from the flood. R. Amen. Deliver, O Lord! the soul of thy servant, as thou deliveredest Abraham from Ur of the Chal- deans. R, Amen. Deliver, O Lord! the soul of thy servant, as thou deliveredest Job from his sufferings. R. Amen. Deliver, O Lord! the soul of thy servant, as thou deliveredest Isaac from being sacrificed by the hand of his father Abraham. R, Amen. Deliver, O Lord! the soul of thy servant,- as thou deliveredest Lot from Sodom, and the flames of fire. R, Amen. Deliver, O Lord! the soul of thy servant, as thou deliveredest Moses from the hands of Pha- roah king of Egypt. R, Amen. Deliver, O Lord! the soul of thy servant, as thou deliveredest Daniel from the lion's den. R. Amen. Deliver, O Lord! the soul of thy servant, as thou deliveredest the three children from the fiery furnace, and from the hands of a wicked king. R, Amen. Deliver, O Lord! the soul of thy servant, as thou deliveredest Susannah from her false ac- cusers. R. Amen. Deliver, O Lord! the soul of thy servant, as 172 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. thou deliveredest David from the hands of king Saul, and from the hands of GoUah. R, Amen. Deliver, O Lord! the soul of thy servant, as thou deliveredest Peter and Paul out of prison. R. Amen. And as thou deliveredest the most blessed St. Thecla, virgin and martyr, from three most dread- ful torments, so vouchsafe to deliver the soul of this thy servant, and make it rejoice with thee m the joys of heaven. R, Amen. We commend to thee, O Lord! the soul of thy servant N, And we beseech thee, O Lord Jesus Christ! the Saviour of the world! that thou wouldst not refuse to admit into the bosom of thy pa- triarchs, a soul for which, in thy mercy, thou wast pleased to come down upon earth. Own him for thy creature, not made by any strange gods, but by thee the only living and true God; for there is no other God but thee, and none that can equal thy works. Let his soul rejoice in thy presence, and remember not his former iniquities and ex- cesses, the unhappy effects of passion or evil con- cupiscence; for although he has sinned, he has not renounced the Father, or the Son, or the Holy Ghost; but believed, and had a zeal for God, and faithfully worshiped him who made all things. Remember not, O Lord! we beseech thee, the sins of his youth, and his ignorance; but according to thy great mercy, be mindful of him in thy heav- enly glory. May the heavens be opened to him, and may the angels rejoice with him. Receive, O Lord! thy servant into thy kingdom. Let St. Michael, the archangel of God, conduct him, who is the chief of the heavenly host. Let the holy CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTE]g. 173 angels of God come to meet him, and carry him to the city of the heavenly Jerusalem. May St. Peter the Apostle receive him, to whom God has given the keys of the kingdom of heaven. May St. Paul the Apostle assist him, who was a vessel of election. May St. John the chosen Apostle of God intercede for him, to whom were revealed the secrets of heaven. May all the holy Apostles pray for him, to whom our Lord gave the power of binding and loosing. May all the saints and elect of God intercede for him, who in this world suf- fered torments for the name of Christ; that he, be- ing delivered from the bonds of the flesh, may de- serve to be admitted into the glory of the kingdom of heaven: through the merits of our Lord Jesus Christ, who with the Father and the Holy Ghost liveth and reigneth for ever and ever. Anien. After which, if the sick person still continue to labour in his agony, it may be proper, as the Ritual prescribes, to continue reciting other Psalms and prayers adapted to those circumstances. Q. What is the meaning of the lighting of a blessed candle, and keeping it burning during a person^s agony? -4. This light represents the light of faith in which a Christian dies, and the light of glory which he looks for. Besides, these candles are blessed by the Church, with a solemn prayer to God, to chase away the devils from those places where they shall be lighted. Q. What is the form of blessing candles? A. The Ritual prescribes the following prayer: F. Our help is in the name of the Lord. i?. Who made heaven and earth. 15* 174 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. Let us pray. O Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of the living God!,. bless ^ by our prayers these candles; pour forth upon them by the virtue of the holy ►Ji cross thy heavenly benediction, who hast given them to ' mankind to chase away darkness; and may they receive such a blessing, by the sign of the holy 4< cross, that in what place soever they shall be lighted or set up, the rulers of darkness, with all their ministers, may depart, and trembling fly away from those dwellings; nor presume any more to disturb or molest those that serve thee the Al- mighty God, who livest and reignest for ever and . ever. Amen. Q. What is the meaning of tolling the passing- bell when a person is expiring. A, To admonish the faithful to pray for him, that God may grant him a happy passage. CHAPTER XIIL OF THE OFFICE FOR THE BURIAL OF THE DEAD. Q. What is the manner and order of burying the dead in the Catholic Church? A. The pastor or parish-priest, accompanied by his clerics, goes to the house of the deceased, and having sprinkled the body or coffin with holy wa- ter, recites the Anthem, 'If thou observe iniquities, O Lord! O Lord! who shall sustain it;' with the 120th Psalm, ' De prof unci is,'' 'From the depth, I have cried,' &c. in the end of which he says, 'Eternal rest give to him, O Lord!' E, 'And let perpetual shine upon him.' Then he repeats the Anthem, 'If thou shalt observe iniquities,' &c. CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED, 175 After this, the body is carried to the Church, the clergy going before, two and two, after the man- ner of a procession and singing the 50th Psalm, * Miserere^ ' Have mercy on me, O God! according to thy great mercy,' &c. and the people following the corpse, and praying in silence for the deceased. When they are come to the Church, the corpse is set down in the middle of the Church, with the feet towards the altar (except the deceased was a priest, in which case the head is to be towards the altar) and wax tapers are lighted and set up round the coffin. Then, if time and opportunity permit, is recited the Dirge, that is, the office of the ma- tins and lauds for the dead, followed by a solemn Mass for the soul of the deceased, according to the most ancient custom of the universal Church. The Dirge and Mass being finished, the priest, standing at the head of the deceased, begins the office of the burial, as follows: Enter not into judgment with thy servant, O Lord! for no one' shall be justified in thy sight, except thou vouchsafe to grant him the remission of all his sins. Let not therefore, we beseech thee, the sentence of thy judgment fall upon him, whom the true supplication of Christian faith recommend- eth to thee: but by the assistance of thy grace let him escape the judgment of thy vengeance, who, whilst he was living, was marked with the sign of the holy Trinity: who iivest and reignest for ever and ever. Amen. Then the Choir sings the following Responsary. Deliver me, O Lord! from eternal death, at that dreadful day, when the heavens and earth shall be moved, when thou shalt come to judge the world 176 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED, by fire. V. I am struck with tremblings and I fear, against the day of account, and of the wrath to come; when the heavens and earth shall be moved. V, That day, a day of wrath, of calamity and misery, a great and most bitter day, when thou shalt come to judge the world by fire. F. Eternal rest give to him, Lord! and let perpe- tual light shine upon him. Deliver me, O Lord! &c. as before, till the Verse, ' I am struck,' &;c. Lord! have mercy on us. Christ! have mercy on us. Lord! have mercy on us. Our Father, &c. (Here the priest puts incense into the thuri- ble, and then going round the coffin, sprinkles with holy water, and afterwards incenses the body, and then concludes the Lord's Prayer.) F. Lead us not into temptation. R, But deliver us from evil. F. From the gate of hell. R, Deliver his soul, O Lord! F. Let him rest in peace. R, Amen. F, O Lord! hear my prayer. R, And let my cry come to thee. F. The Lord be with you. R, And with thy spirit. Let us pray. O God! to whom it belongs always to show mercy, and to spare, we humbly beseech thee for the soul of thy servant N. which thou hast this day commanded to depart out of this world, that thou wouldst not deliver it up into the hands of the enemy, nor put it out of thy memory for ever, but that thou wouldst order it to be received by the holy angels, and conducted to Paradise, its truo country: that since it has believed and hoped in thee, it may not suffer the pains of hell, but take possession of everlasting joys, through Christ oui Lord. Amen. CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 177 After this, whilst the body is carried towards the place of its interment, is sung or said the fol- lowing Anthem. »May the angels conduct thee into Paradise, may the martyrs receive thee at thy coming, and bring thee to the holy city of Jerusalem; may the choir of angels receive thee, and mayest thou have eter- nal rest with Lazarus, who was formerly poor. When they are come to the grave, if it has not been blessed before, the priest blesses it by the following prayer, which is the same that we make use of in this kingdom, in blessing the mould or earth, which we put in the coffin with the corpse, in the private burial office. O God! by whose tender mercy the souls of the faithful find rest, vouchsafe to bless this tomb, and depute thy holy angel to guard it, and absolve from all the bonds of sin the souls of those whose bodies are here interred, that with thy saints they may ever rejoice without end in thee. Through Christ our Lord, Amen. Then the priest sprinkles with holy water, and afterwards incenses both the corpse of the deceased and the grave. Then, whilst the body is put in the earth, is sung or said the following Anthem, with the Canticle Benedictus, or the song of Za- charias, St: Luke, i. 65, &c. ,1 am the resurrection and the life, he that be- lieveth in me, although he be dead, shall live; and every one that liveth, and belie veth in me, shall not die for ever. St. John xi. 25. Or else (as it is the custom in many places) when the body is put in the earth, the priest, with the as- sistants, recites the penitential Psalm, Miserere, 178 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAI*^ INSTRUCTED. Then the priest says, Lord! have mercy on us. Christ! have mercy on us. Lord! have mercy on us. Our Father, &c. (Here he sprinkles the body with holy water.) V, And lead us not into tempta- tion. E. But deliver us from evil. V, From the gate of hell. E, Deliver his soul, O Lord! F. Let him rest in peace. R. Amen. V, O Lord! hear my prayer. R, And let my cry come unto thee. F. The Lord be with you. R. And with thy spirit. Let us pray. Grant, O Lordl this mercy to thy servant de- ceased, that he, (or she) may not receive a return of punishment for his (or her) deeds, who in his (or her) wishes was held fast by thy will; that as here true faith has joined him (or her) to the com- pany of thy faithful, so thy mercy there may associate him (or her) to the choirs of angels. Through Christ our Lord. Amen. V. Eternal rest give to him, O Lord! R, And let perpetual light shine upon him. F. Let him rest in peace. R, Amen. May his soul, and the souls of all the faithful departed, through the mercy of God, rest in peace. Then the priest, returning from the grave, re- cites the Psalm, ' Be profundis,'^ with the Anthem, 'If thou shalt observe iniquities, O Lord! O Lord^ who shall sustain it?' CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTETJCTED. 179 CHAPTER XIV. OF PRAYERS FOR THE DEAD, AND OF PURGATORT. Q. What is the meaning of prayers for the dead? A. Praying for the dead is a practice as ancient as Christianity, received by tradition from the Apostles, as appears by the most certain monu- ments of antiquity and observed by the Syna- gogue, or church of God in the Old Testament, as appears from 2 Machab. xii. v^ritten long before Christ's coming, and followed by the Jews to this day; — a practice grounded upon Christian charity, which teaches us to pray for all that are in neces- sity, and to implore God's mercy for all that are capable of mercy; which we have reason to be convinced is the case of many of our deceased brethren, and therefore we pray for them. Q. How do you prove that the practice of p«ray- ing for the dead is as ancient as Christianity? A, From Tertullian, in his book of the Soldier's Crown, chap. 3. written about a hundred years after the death of the Apostles; where he reckons the oblations for the dead upon their anniversary days, amongst the immemorial traditions observed by all Christians: and in his book de Monogamia, chap. 10. where he affirms it to be the duty of a Christian widow to pray for the soul of her hus- band, and to beg a refreshment for him, and to keep his anniversaries. See St. Cyprian, epist. ^^, Arnobius, I. 4. Eusebius 1. 4. de Vita Constantini, c. 71. St. Cyril of Jerusalem, Catech. Mystag. 5. St. Gregory Nazianzen, Orat. 10, &c. Hence, St. John Chrysostom, Hom. 3. upon the Epistle to the Philippians, tells us, that it was ordained by the 180 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN mSTRVCTED, Apostles that the dead should be commemorated in the sacred mysteries; and St. Augustine, serm. 32. *de Verbis Apost. J 2.' that it was a practice re- ceived from the fathers, and observed by the uni- versal Church. And it appears from St. Epipha- nius, Hser, 75. that Arius was ranked amongst the heretics by the Church in the fourth century, for denying that the prayers of the living did the dead any good. Q. Is it any argument, in favour of prayers for the dead, that it was practised by Judas Macha- bseus, and by the Jews before the coming of Christ? A, Yes, a very great argument; first, because this practice is expressly approved in the 12th chapter of the second book of Machabees; which books, by many councils and fathers, are ranked amongst the divine scriptures. Secondly, because the Jews in those days were undoubtedly the people of God. Thirdly, because as Dr. Taylor writes, Lib. of Prophesying, sect. 20. numb. 11. p. 265. ^ We find by the history of the Machabees that the Jews did pray and make offerings for the dead, which also appears by other testimonies, and by their form of prayers, still extant, which they used in the captivity. Now it is very consider- able, that since our blessed Saviour did reprove all the evil doctrines and traditions of the Scribes and Pharisees, and did argue concerning the dead and the resurrection against the Saducees, yet he spake no word against this public practice, but left it as he found it; which he who came to declare to us all the will of his Father would not have done, if it had not been innocent, pious, and full of charity.'' Q. But what reason is there to believe, that our prayers can be of any service to the dead? A. The same reason as there is to believe, that CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 181 our prayers are of service to the living; Ibr v^he- ther we consult the scripture, or primilivo tradi- tion, with relation to the pronaises or encourage- ments given in favour of our prayers, we shall no where find the dead excepted fronn the benefit of thenn; and the perpetual practice of the Church of God, which is the best interpreter of the scrip- ture, has fronn the very beginning ever authorized prayers for the dead, as believing such prayers beneficial to thenn. Q. But are not they that have past this nnortal life arrived to an unchangeable state of happiness or nnisery, so that they either want not our pray- ers, or cannot be bettered by them? A, Some there are, though I fear but few, that have before their death so fully cleared all accounts with the divine Majesty, and washed away all their stains in the blood of the Lamb, as to go straight to heaven after death; and such as those stand not in need of our prayers. Others therQ are, and their numbers are very great, who die in the guilt of deadly sin, and such as these go straight to hell, like the rich glutton in the gospel, St. Luke xvi. and therefore cannot be bettered by our prayers. But, besides these two kinds, there are many Christians, who, when they die, are neither so perfectly pure and clean, as to exempt them from the least spot or stain, nor yet so unhappy as to die under the guilt of unrepented deadly sin. Now, such as these the Church believes to be, for a time, in a middle state, which we call purgatory; and these are they who are capable of receiving benefit by our prayers. For though we pray for all that die in the communion of the Church, be- cause we do not certainly know the particular state in which each one dies, yet we are sensible that 16 182 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. our prayers are available for those only that are in this middle state. Q. But what grounds have you to believe that there is any such place as a purgatory, or middle state of souls? A. We have the strongest grounds imaginable from all kind of arguments, from scripture, from perpetual tradition, from the authority and decla- ration of the Church of God, and from reason. Q. What grounds have you for purgatory from scripture? A. First, because the scripture teaches us in many places, that it is the fixed rule of God's justice, ' to render to every man according to his works.' See Psalm Ixii. 12. St. Matt. xvi. 27. Romans ii. 6. Rev. xxii. 12, &c. So that accord- ing to the works which each man has done in the time of his mortal life, and according to the state in which he is found at the moment of his depar- ture out of this life, he shall certainly receive reward or punishment from God. Hence it evi- dently follows, that as by this rule of God's justice, they that die in great and deadly sins, not cancel- led by repentance, will be eternally punished in hell; so by the same rule, they that die in lesser or venial sins (which is certainly the case of a great many) will be punished somewhere for a time, till God's justice be satisfied, and this is what we call purgatory. Secondly, because the scripture assures us, Rev. xxi. 27. that 'there shall in no wise enter into the heavenly Jerusalem any thing that defileth, or that is defiled.' So that if the soul is found to have the least spot or stain, at the time of her departure out of this life, she cannot in that condition go straight to heaven. CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 183 Now, how few are there that depart this life, perfectly pure from the dregs and stains, to which we are ever subject in this state of mortality? and yet God forbid that every little spot or stain should condemn the soul to the everlasting torments of hell. Therefore, there must be a middle place for such souls as die under these lesser stains. Thirdly, because the scripture assures us, St. Matt* xii. 36. that we are to render an account hereafter to the great Judge, even, 'for every word,' that we have spoken; and consequently, every idle word, not cancelled here by repentance, is liable to be punished by God's justice hereafter. Now no one can think that God will condemn a soul to hell for every idle word; therefore there must be another place of punishment for those that die guilty of these little transgressions. Fourthly, because St. Paul informs us, 1 Cor. iii. 13, 14, 15. that 'every man's work shall be made manifest,' by a fiery trial; and that they who have built upon the foundation, which is Christ, wood, hay, and stubble, (that is, whose works have been very imperfect and defective, though not to the degree of losing Christ) 'shall suffer loss; but them- selves shall be saved, yet so as by fire.' Which place cannot be well explained otherwise than by the fire of purgatory. Fifthly, because our Lord tells us, St. Matt. xii. 32. that 'whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, neither in the world to come.' Where our Lord (who could not speak any thing absurd, or out of the way) would never have mentioned ' for- giveness in the world to come,' if sins not forgiven in this world could never be forgiven in the world to come. Now if there may be forgiveness of any 184 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. Bin whatsoever in the world to come, there must be a middle place or purgatory; for no sin can enter heaven to be forgiven there, and in hell there is no forgiveness. Add to these texts of scripture the prison men- tioned, St. Matt. V. 26. out of which a man 'shall not come till he has paid the uttermost farthing;' and 'the spirits in prison,' to which our Saviour is said to have gone to preach, 1 Pet. iii. 18, 19, 20. Q. What grounds have you for purgatory from perpetual tradition ? A, Because, as we have seen already, the Jewish Church long before our Saviour's coming, and the Christian Church from the very beginning, have offered prayers and sacrifice for the repose and relief of the faithful departed, as appears from in- numerable testimonies of the fathers, and from the most ancient liturgies of all Christian Churches and nations, Romans, Greeks, Syrians, Armenians, Nestorians, Egyptians, Ethiopians," Indians, Mosar- bes, &c. Which consent, so ancient and so univer sal, of all ages and of all nations, before protes tantism, is a most convincing argument that this practice came by tradition from the Apostles; and consequently that the belief of a purgatory is an apostolic tradition: for what sense could there be in praying for the repose and relief of the souls of the faithful departed, if there were no middle place, but all went straight to heaven or hell? Q, What grounds have you for the belief of a purgatory from the authority of the Church? A. Because the Church of Christ has declared that there is a purgatory, as well by condemning of old Arius for a heretic, for denying that the prayers of the living did the dead any service, as also by the express definitions of her general Coun- CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. ISS oils. Now the Scripture most evidently teaches us, in many places, that we are to hear and obey the Church, and that Christ and the Holy Ghost will be always with the Church to guide her into all truth, and that the gates of hell shall not prevail against her. So that what the Church has thus declared can be no error, but must absolutely be a most certain truth. Q. What grounds have you for the belief of a purgatory from reason? A. Because reason teaches these two things: first, that every sin, be it ever so small, is an offence of God, and consequently deserves pun- ishment from the justice of God; and therefore that every person that dies under the guilt of any such offence un repented, must expect to be punished by the justice of God. Secondly, that there are small sins, in which a person may hap- pen to die, that are so small, either through the levity of the matter, or for want of a full deli- beration in the act, as not to deserve everlasting punishments. From whence it plainly follows, that besides the place of everlasting punishment, which we call hell, there must be also a place of temporal punishment for such as die in those lesser offences, and this we call purgatory. Q. But does not the blood of Christ sufficiently purify us from all our sins, without any other purgatory? A. The blood of Christ purifies none that are once come to the use of reason, from any sin with- out repentance; and therefore such sins as have not been here recalled by repentance, must be punished hereafter, according to their gravity, by the divine Justice, either in hell, if the sins be mortal; o^ if venial, in purgatory. 16* 186 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. Q. Do you then think that any repentance can be available after death? A. No; but God's justice must take place after death, which will render to every man according to his works. So that we do not believe that the repentance of the souls that are in purgatory, or any thing else that they can then do, will cancel their sins; but they must suffer for them till God's justice be satisfied. Q. Are they not then capable of relief in that state? A, Yes they are, but not from any thing that they can do for themselves, but from the prayers, alms, and other suffrages offered to God for them by the faithful upon earth, which God in his mercy is pleased to accept of, by reason of that communion which we have with them, by being fellow members of the same body of the church, under the same head, which is Christ Jesus. Q. But what do you say to that text of scrip- ture, Eccles. xi. 'If the tree fall towards the south, or toward the north, in the place where the tree falleth there shall it lie?' A, I say that it is no way evident that this text has relation to the state of the soul after death; but if it be so understood as to have relation to the soul, it makes nothing against purgatory, because it only proves what no Catholic denies; viz. that when once a soul is come to the south, or to the north, that is to heaven or hell, its state is un- changeable. Q. But does not the scripture promise rest after death to such 'as die in the Lord,' Rev. xiv. 13.^ A. Yes it does, but then we are to understand, that those are said to die in the Lord, who die for the Lord by martyrdom; or at least those who, at ^- CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 187 the time of their death, are so happy as to have no debts nor stains to interpose between them and the Lord. As for others who die but imperfectly in the Lord, they shall rest indeed from the labours of this world; but as their works that follow ihem are imperfect, they must expect to ' receive from the Lord according to their works.' Q, Christ said to the thief upon the cross, St. Luke xxiii. ' this day shalt thou be with me in Paradise;^ what appearance then is there that any one dying in God's grace should go to purgatory? A. The case of this penitent thief, to whom Christ was pleased to give a full discharge at once of all his sins, was extraordinary, as his faith and confession were extraordinary; and therefore to make a general rule from this particular instance is a bad way of arguing; the more, because we have reason to be convinced, that not one in a thousand dies so perfectly penitent, as to be per- fectly purified before death from all the dregs of sin, which was the particular grace granted to this penitent thief. If you ask me, — what is meant by Paradise in that text, and how the penitent thief could be with Christ that day in Paradise, before our Lord had taken possession of heaven for himself and us, by his resurrection and ascension? I answer, that our Lord descending after death into limbo, to the holy fathers, made that place a Paradise, by mani- festing his glory to those happy souls: and this was the Paradise into which he introduced the penitent thief immediately after his death. 188 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. CHAPTER XV. OF THE SACRAMENT OF HOLY ORDERS. Q. What do you mean by the sacrament of holy Orders? A. A sacrament by which the ministers of Christ are consecrated to their sacred functions, and re- ceive grace to discharge them well. Q. How do you prove that holy Orders are a sacrament? A. Because they are a visible sign of an invi sible grace, and that by divine institution, or by the ordinance of Christ, which alone can annex the gift of grace to any outward rite or ceremony. The outward and visible sign is found in the impo- sition or laying on of the bishop's hands and prayer: after which sort we tind the seven deacons ordain- ed. Acts vi. 6. and St. Paul and St. Barnabas, Acts xiii. 3. The invisible grace, conferred by this imposition of hands, is attested, 2 Tim. i. 6. 'Stir up the grace of God, which is in thee by the impo- sition of hands.' And the divine institution of holy Orders is gathered, as well from the use of the Apostles, and the perpetual tradition of the church, as from those texts in which Christ bequeathed the whole power of the priesthood to his disciples, and to their successors, St. Luke xxii. 19. 'Do this in remembrance of me;' and St. John xx. 22. 23. 'Receive ye the Holy Ghost: whose soever sins ye remit, they are remitted unto them; and whose soever sins ye retain, they are retained.' Q. By what steps do persons ascend in the Ca* tholic church to the Order of Priesthood? A. First, they must be initiated by the clerical tonsure, which is not properly an Order, but only CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 189 a preparation for Orders. The bishop cuts off the extremities of their hair, to signify their renounc- ing the world, and its vanities; and he revests them with a surplice, and so receives them into the clergy; they making at the same time a so» lemn profession of taking the Lord for their in- weritance and portion for ever. Secondly, they must pass through the minor or lesser orders, which have been received from the primitive Church, viz. the Orders of porter or door-keeper of the church; lector, or reader of the lessons in the divine office: exorcist, whose func- tion is to read the exorcisms and prayers of the church over those who are possessed or obsessed by the devil; and acolyth, whose function is to serve the Mass, light the candles in the church, &c. All these are ordained by receiving from the bishop the instruments or books belonging to their respective offices, and solemn prayers prescribed in the Pontifical. Thirdly, from the minor orders they are pro- moted to the order of sub-deacon, which is the first of those that are called holy. In the conferring this order, the bishop puts the candidates in mind, that hitherto they have had their liberty to quit the ecclesiastical calling, and engage themselves by marriage in the world; but if they will be ordained sub-deacons, which he leaves to their choice, they are thereby tied for ever to the ser* vice of God and his church in the state of perpe- tual continence. Sub-deacons also are obliged to Jhe canonical hours of the church-office; and in the High-Mass assist the deacon in his ministry. Fourthly, from the Order of sub-deacon they are advanced to the Order of deacon, which is conferred upon them by the imposition of the bish- 190 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. op's hands, and by delivering to them the book of the gospels. The deacon's office is to assist the bishop or priest in the sacrifice of the Mass, to sing and preach the gospels, to baptize, &;c. Fifthly, from the Order of deacon the next ascent is to the Order of priest, or presbyter, above which is the Order of bishops, amongst whom the chief is called the Pope. Q. In what manner is the Order of priesthood administered? A, The person that is to be ordained is present- ed to the bishop by the arch-deacon, desiring, in the name of the church, that he may be promoted to priesthood, and bearing testimony of his being worthy of that office. Then the bishop publishes to the clergy and people there present the designed promotion, that if any one has any thing to allege against the person that is to be ordained, he may freely declare it. If no one appears to allege any thing against him, the bishop proceeds to admonish him of the duties and functions of the priesthood, and to exhort him to a diligent discharge thereof. After which, both the bishop and the person that is to be ordained, prostrate themselves in prayer, whilst the litanies are sung or said by the choir or clergy there present; which being ended, the bish- op stands up, and the person that is to be ordained kneeling, the bishop first, and then all the priests there present, one after another, lay both their hands on his head, which imposition of hands is immediately followed by the solemn prayers of consecration, and by revesting him with the priest- ly ornaments; then the Holy Ghost is invoked by the hymn, Veni Creator. After which the bishop anoints the hands of the person ordained, and then delivers into his hands the chalice with the wine CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 191 and water, and the paten with the bread, saying, "Receive the power to offer sacrifice to God, and celebrate Mass, as well for the living as for the dead, in the name of the Lord." Then the person ordained says Mass with the bishop, and receives the holy communion at his hands. At the end of the Mass the bishop again imposes his hand upon him, saying those words of Christ: St. John xi. 22, 23. 'Receive the Holy Ghost: whose sins thou shalt forgive, they are forgiven them: and whose sins thou shalt retain, they are retained.' After which he receives from him the promise of obe- dience, and gives him the kiss of peace. CHAPTER XVI. OF THE SUPERIORITY OF THE BISHOPS, AND OF THE SUPREMACY OF THE POPE. Q. How do you prove that besides priests or presbyters, there has been always in the church the Order of bishops, superior to that of priests? A. I prove it both from scripture and perpetual tradition. The New Testament, in several places, mentions bishops, as Philip, i. 1. 1 Tim. iii. 2. Tit. i. 7. Acts XX. 28. And it is visible, that the angels of the seven churches of Asia, mentioned in the first, second, and third chapters of the Revelation, were the bishops of those sees, and accordingly had a jurisdiction over them. It is no less visible, from the epistles of St. Paul to Timothy and Titus, that both one and the other were bishops, with power of ordaining inferior priests; and Timothy, in particular, is instructed by the Apostle, in what manner he is to comport himself to the priests under him, 1 Tim. v. 17, 19. And as for perpe- 192 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. tual tradition, it is evident from all kind of monu- ments, and from the most ancient church history, that the church has always been governed by bishops, and that the Apostles every where estab- lished bishops. Thus St. Irenosus, 1. 3. c. 3. Ter- tullian, L. de Prescrip. and other ancients assure us, that Linus and Clement were ordained bishops by St. Peter and St. Paul for the see of Rome. Thus Eusebius, and other ancient monuments, in- form us, that St. Mark was the first bishop of Alexandria, and was succeeded by Anianus; thai Evodius and Ignatius, disciples of the Apostles, were, after St. Peter, the first bishops of Antioch; that St. James was constituted by the Apostles the first bishop of Jerusalem, and had for successor Simeon the son of Cleophas; that St. Polycarp was made bishop of Smyrna by St. John, &c. Q. How do you prove, that amongst bishops one should be head, and have a jurisdiction over the restT A. Because Christ has so appointed, who gave that pre-eminence to St. Peter with respect to the rest of the Apostles; as appears from St. Matt. xvi. 18, 19. when, in reward of his faith and confe»- fiion, he confirmed to him the name of Peter, or Rock; and promised to him, that upon this rock he would build his church, and the gates of hell should not prevail against it; and that he would give him the Mceys of the kingdom of heaven,' &c. And from St. John xxi. 15, &c. when our Lord, after having asked St. Peter, 'Dost thou love me more than these?' three times committed to him the charge of all his lambs and sheep, without exception; that is, of his whole Church. Hence, St. Matthew, ch. x. 2. reckoning the names of the twelve Apostles says, *The first, Simon, who is called Peter.' Now, it does not appear that ho CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 193 could be called the first, upon any other account but by reason of his supremacy; for that he was first in age is more than appears, and that he was first in calling is not true; for St. Andrew came to Christ before Peter, and was probably the elder brother; and certain it is, that the Evangelists, in reckoning up the names of the Apostles, upon several occasions, neither follow the order of their age, nor of their calling; yet they always reckon Peter in the first place, and sometimes more clear- ly to intimate his pre-eminence, name him alone as chief or prince; as St. Mark i. 36. ^ Simon, and they that were with him:' St. Luke ix. 32. ^ Peter and they that were with him:' Acts ii. 14. 'Peter standing up with the eleven:' Acts v. 29. 'Peter and the Apostles answered and said,' &c. where the Protestant translation has put in the word ^ other Apostles,' as clearly seeing that the former expression (which is that of the original) too clear- ly expressed St. Peter's being something more than the rest. It is also worth observing, that our Lord was pleased to teach the people out of St. Peter's ship, St. Luke V. 3. that he ordered the same tribute to be paid for himself and Peter, St. Matt. xvii. 27: that he particularly prayed for Peter, that his faith should not fail, and ordered him to confirm or strengthen his brethren, St. Luke xxii. 32, &c. Hence St. Peter's supremacy is acknowledged by the perpetual tradition of the holy fathers. See Origin on the 6th chapter to the Romans, and in his 5th Homily upon Exodus; St. Basil, of tho Judgment of God, c. 2. p. 402: St. CyriK of Jeru- salem, in his 2d Catechesis: St. Epiphanius, Haer, 61. 5 17. & Hoer. 64. }. 7. and in his Anchoratus, j 6. p. 14, 15: St. John Chrysostom in his 2d Homily 17 194 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. on the 50th Psalm, in his 54th Homily upon St, Matthew, &;c. St. Cyril, of Alexandria, in his 12th Book upon St. John: St. Austerius, Bishop of Ama- seea, in his sermon upon St. Peter and St. Paul: and among the Latins, St. Cyprian, Epist. 70. to Januarius: St. Optatus of Milevis, 1. 2. and 7. St Ambrose, 1. 10. upon St. Luke; St. Hierome in his 1st. Book against Jovinian; St. Augustine, 1. 2. de Baptismo, c. 1: St. Leo, Epist. 84. to Anastasiusj St. Gregory the Great, 1. 4. Epist. 32, &:c. Q. How do you prove that St. Peter was to have a successor in this office of chief bishop of the Church? A. Because as Christ established his church to remain till the end of the world, St. Matt, xxviii. 20. so most certainly he designed, that the form of government which he established in his church should remain for ever. Hence, supposing the supremacy of St. Peter, which we have proved above from scripture, it cannot be questioned, but that our Lord designed that this supremacy, which he appointed for the better government of his church, and the preserving of unity, should not die with Peter, no more than the church, (with which he promised to remain for ever,) but should de- scend, after St. Peter's decease, to his successors. For it is not to be imagined, that Christ should appoint a chief bishop for the government of his church, and maintaining unity in the Apostles' time, and design another kind of government for succeeding ages, when there was like to be so much greater danger of schism, and consequently so much greater need of one head, to preserve all in one faith and one communion. Q. But how do you prove that the Pope or Dishop of Rome is the successor of St. Peter. CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 195 A, I prove it, first, because the church never acknowledged any oihcr for her chief pastor; and no olher does, or ever did, put in a claim to the spiritual supremacy, in quality of St. Peter's suc- cessor; so that, supposing what has been proved, that Christ appointed a chief pastor of his Church, the bishop of Home must be the man. Secondly, I prove it from the current sense of the holy fathers and councils, that have acknow- ledged this supremacy in the see of Rome and her bishops. See St. Ignatius, disciple of the Apostles, in the beginning of his Epistle to the Romans, where he calls the church of Rome the presiding church; St. Irenseus, I. 3. c. 3. who calls the same the greatest and most ancient church, founded by the two most glorious Apostles Peter and Paul; and adds, that all sectaries are confounded by the Ro- man tradition : for to this church, by reason of its more powerful principality, says he, it is neces- sary that every church resort, or have recourse; in which (church) the apostolical tradition has al- ways been preserved by those that are in every place; and St. Cyprian, in his 55th Epistle to pope Cornelius, where he calls the see of Rome, the chair of Peter, and the principal church from which the priestly unity has its origin. Ecclesiam Princi])alem^ unde TJnitas Sacerdotalis exorta est. See also St. Optatus, bishop of Melevis, in his 2nd Book against Parmenianus, the Donatist Bish- op of Carthage: where he thus addresses himself to his adversary. You cannot pretend to be igno- rant, that Peter held first the bishop's chair in the city of Rome, in which Peter, head of all the Apostles sat — in which one chair unity might be maintained by all, lest the rest of the Apostles should each one claim his own separate chair. So 190 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. that he is now a schismatic, and an offender, who against this single chair erects any other. In this one chair, which is the first of the properties of the church, Peter first sat; to him succeeded Linus, lo him Clement, &c. Give you now an account of the origin of your chair, you who claim to yourselves the holy church. * And St. Jerome, writing to pope Damasus,.EpisL 57. tells him; I am joined in communion with your Holiness, that is, with the chair of Peter: upon that rock I know the church is built: whoever eats the lamb out of this house is profane: whosoever is not in (this) Ark shall perish in the deluge, &c. And St. Augustine in his Psalm against the Donatists thus addresses himself to these schisma- tics. Come brethren, says he, if you have a mind to be engrafted in the vine, it is a pity to see you lopped off in this manner from the stock. Reckon up the prelates in the very see of Peter: and in that order of fathers see which has succeeded which. This is the rock over which the proud gates of hell prevail not. And in his 162d Epistle he tells the Donatists, that in the see of Rome the principality (or supremacy) of the apostolic church was ever acknowledged. Semper ApostoIiccB Ca- thedrcc viguit Principatus, And St. Prosper, in his dogmatic Poem against the enemies of grace, calls Rome, the See of Peter, which being made to the world the head of pasto- ral dignity, rules by religion all that which she possesses not by her arms. And to the same effect St. Leo the Great, in his first Sermon upon St. Peter and St. Paul, thus addresses himself to Rome: these are they who have advanced thee to this glory, that being made the head of the world, by being St. Peter's See, thou hast a wider extent CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 197 of religious empire than of earthly dominion. Foi though by thy many victories thou hast extended thy dominions far and near by sea and land, yet that which has been subdued by the labour of thy arms is not so much as that which has been made subject to thee by Christian peace.' All these fa- thers, hitherto quoted, flourished within four hun- dred years after the passion of Christ. The supremacy of the bishops of Rome has also been acknowledged by many general councils: as by the general Council of Ephesus, in the sen- tence of depositions against Nestorius, anno 431, by the general Council of Chalcedon, in their epistle to St. Leo, anno 451, by the general Coun- cil of Constantinople, anno 680, in their epistle to pope* Agatha: not to menton the decrees of later general councils, especially the fourth of Late ran, anno 1215, the second of Lyons, anno 1274, and that of Florence, anno 1439. Though as pope Galasius, long ago, in the Council of Rome of seventy bishops, anno 494, has declared, 'The Roman See hath not its pre-eminence over other churches from any ordinances of councils, but from the words of our Lord and Saviour in the gospel, 'Thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church,' &c. Q. But has the pope or bishop of Rome in every age since the days of the Apostles, exercised this supremacy over other churches? A. Yes, most certainly: in the very age imme- diately after the Apostles, that is, in the second century, pope Victor threatened to excommunicate the bishops of Asia Minor, for keeping Easter at an undue time, Eusebius, I. 5. Histor. Eccles. c. 24. And though it is probable he relented upon the remonstrances of St. Irenseus and others, yet no 17* 198 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. one of them all charged him with usurping an authority which did not of right belong to him- In the third century, St. Cyprian, epist. 67. wrote to pope Stephen, desiring him to despatch his let- ters into the province and to the people of Aries, by which they might be authorized to depose Mar- cianus the bishop of Aries, and substitute another in his place. Dirigantiir in Provinciam d te liierce, quihus ahsente MarcianOy alius in locum ejus substituatur. In the fourth century, pope Julius cited St. Anthanasius, bishop of Alexandria, that is to say, the second patriarch of the church, to his Council at Rome, to answer the accusations of his adver- saries; who accordingly did appear, and was there cleared. See St. Athanasius's Apology against the Arians, num. 29. p. 148. of the new edition; and Theodoret, 1. 2. Hist. c. 3. The same pope, as we learn from the historian Socrates, 1. 2. c. 15. and Sozomenus, 1. 3. c. fi. about the same time restored by his authority to their respective Sees, from whence they had been deposed by the Eusebians, St. Paul, bishop of Constantinople, St. Lucius, bish- op of Adrianople, Marcellus, bishop of Ancyra in Galatia, and Asclepas, bishop of Gaza in Palestine; and this as Sozomenus expressly words it, because, by reason of the dignity of his See, the care of all belonged to him. In the fifth century, pope Ceie- stine deputed Si. Cyril, Patriach of Alexandria, to proceed as his delegate to the excommunication of Nestorius, Patriarch of Constinople, torn. 3. Concil, Labbe, p. 349. And in the same century, St. John Chrysostom, and St. Flavian, both Patriarchs of Constantinople, unjustly deposed by numerous coun- cils in the East, appealed from their judgment, the one to pope Innocent I. the other to pope Leo the CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 199 Great. See the espistle of St. John Chrysostom to pope Innocent, and the 23d epistle of St. Leo. In the sixth century, pope Agapetus deposed Anthymus Patriarch of Constantinople; not to mention many other instances in all these centuries of the exer- cise of the pope's jurisdiction over other churches; and as for the following ages there is no dispute. From all which it follows, that the Protestant pretences of the Pope's having received the su- premacy from Phocas, the emperor of Constanti- nople, who began to reign anno 602, is a ground- less fiction, like the idle tale of pope Joan. Q. But does not our Lord intimate, St. Luke xxii. 24, 25, 26. that amongst his disciples none .should be the chief or head. A. No; but only that 'he that is the greatest should be as the younger, and he that is chief as jie that doth serve,' verse 16. Which words, so far from denying, evidently suppose a chief; which is further confirmed by our Lord's alleging himself for an example in the following verse, who was most certainly chief. So that what is here recom- mended, is not equality of jurisdiction, but humility in superiors. Q. But does not St. Paul say, 2 Cor. xii. 11. *In nothing am I behind the very chiefest apostle, though I be nothing;' where was then St. Peter's supremacy? A. It is visible that St. Paul speaks with regard to his labours, miracles and doctrine, in which he was inferior to none; but whether St. Peter or he had a superior jurisdiction, was foreign to the mat- ter he had then in hand, and therefore no wonder that he takes no notice of it. Q. If St. Peter was head, how come St. Paul to withstand him to his face at Antioch, Gal. ii. 11? 200 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. A, Because as the Apostle tells us in the same place, he was to blame, viz. in withdrawing him- self from the table of the Gentiles, for fear of giving offence to the Jews: and this it was that St. Paul reprehended, because of the danger of the Gentiles taking scandal thereby. But this no way disproves St. Peter's superiority, since no one doubts, but that a superior, when in fault, may sometimes lawfully be reprehended by an inferior. And, after all, do our adversaries imagine that the enhancing the dignity and authority of St. Paul makes any thing against the bishop of IlomC; who indeed inherits the succession both of St. Peter and St. Paul, who both honoured Rome with their preaching and with their death? Q. But some Protestants doubt whether St. Peter ever was at Rome, what say you to this? A. Grotius, a learned Protestant, writes that, * no christian ever doubted but St. Peter was at Rome.' In Synopsi Criticorum, p. 1450. H. And Chamierus, another learned Protestant, tells us, that "all the fathers with great accord have as- serted that Peter went to Rome and governed that Church." Omnes Palres magno consensu asserue- runt Petrum Romam esse profectutn, eamque Eccle- siam administrasse, 1. 13. c. 4. } 2. And Dr. Pear- son, the Protestant bishop of Chester, one of the most eminent men amongst the Protestant writers ever known, has demonstrated, by innumerable arguments, that Peter was at Rome, and that the bishops of Rome are his successors. See Pearson's Opera Posthuma, printed at London, anno 1688, p. 27, &c. Q. Does the scripture any where affirm that St. Peter was at Rome? CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 201 A, St. Peter's first epistle seems to affirm it, chap. V. 13. where, by Babylon, the best interpre- ters understand Rome, so called by the Apostle, as afterwards by St. John in the Apocalypse, because then the chief seat both of the empire and of hea- thenish idolatry, as formerly Babylon had been. And so this place is understood by St. Papias, dis- ciple of the Apostles, and Clement of Alexandria, alleged by Euseb. 1. 2. Hist. c. 15. and by St. Hie- rome, 1. de Scriptor. in Marco; by venerable Bede, (Ecumenius, and others. Nor is there any pro- bability that the Babylon here mentioned could be that in Chaldaea, which at this time was nothing but a heap of ruins, nor that in Egypt, W'hich was but a very inconsiderable place in those days, and in which no monuments of antiquity give us the least hint that St. Peter ever preached. But if the scripture had been entirely silent in this matter, we have it proved by universal tradi- tion, which is the means by which we come to the knowledge of the scripture itself And indeed there is a more universal tradition for St. Peter's being at Rome, than there is for many parts of the scripture which Protestants receive: for whereas many of the ancient fathers have called in ques- tion some books of scripture — for instance the Re- velation, the Epistle to the Hebrews, &c. and there is scarce any part of the Bible or New Testament but what has been rejected by some heretics of old; yet we cannot find that St. Peter's being at Rome was ever called in question by any single man, infidel or christian, catholic or heretic, for thirteen or fourteen hundred years after Christ; though all heretics and schismatics, as being always ene- mies of the church of Rome, would have been most glad to have called in question this succession of 202 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. St. Peter (which the bishops of Rome ever gloried in) had not the matter of fact been out of dispute. The ancient fathers that have attested St. Peter's being at Eome, besides many others, are, St. Ire- naus, 1. 3. c. 3; St. Denys, bishop of Corinth; Caius and Origen, alleged by Eusebius in his Church History, p. 71, 78; Tertullian, 1. de Prsescript, c. 36. and in Scorpiaco, c. 5; St. Cyprian, Epist. 6!2 and 55; Arnobius, 1. 2. contra Gentes; Lactan- tius, 1. de Morte Persecutorum, c. 2; Eusebius, 1. 2. Hist. c. 14. p. 62, 1. 3. c. 4. p. 74; St. Athanasius, in Apolog. de fuga sua, p. 331; St. Cyril of Jerusa- lem, Catech. 6. p. 54; St. Ambrose, 1. 4; Hexam, c. 8; St. Jerome, de Scriptoribus Eccles. in Petro & in Marco, and in his Chronicon ad Anncs 43 & 69 Sulpitius Severus, 1. 2; Hist. St. Augustine, 1. de Hser. c. 1. Epist. 63. 1. 2 contra Lit. Petil. c. 61; St. John Chrysostom, torn. 6. Hom. 12; Orositus, 1. 7. c. 6; St. Peter Chrysologus, Epist. ad Eutych; St. Optatus, 1. 2. contra Parmenia; Theodoret, in Epist. ad Eom. & 1. 1. Hasret. Fab. c. 1, &c. CHAPTER XVn. OF THE CELIBACY OF THE CLERGY. Q. What is the reason why the Catholic Clergy are not allowed to marry? A, Because at their entering into holy Orders, they make a solemn promise to God and the church to live continently. Now the breach of such a promise as this would be a great sin; witness St. Paul, 1 Tim. v. 11, 12. where speak-; ing of widows that are for marrying, after hav- ing thus engaged themselves to God, he says, *They have damnation, because they have cast' CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 203 off their first faith; that is, their solemn engage- ment made to God. Q. But why does the church receive none to holy Orders, but such as are willing to make this solemn engagement? A, Because she does not think it proper that they, who by their office and function, ought to be wholly devoted to the service of God, and the care of souls, should be diverted from these duties by the distractions of a married life, 1 Cor. vii. 32, 33. ' He that is unmarried, careth for the things that belong to the Lord, how he may please the Lord: but he that is married, careth for the things that are of the world, how he may please his wife.' Q. But was it always a law in the church that the clergy should abstain for marriage? A, It was always a law in the church that bish- ops, priests and deacons shall not marry after hav- ing received holy Orders; and we hav^ not one example, in all antiquity, either in the Greek or Latin church of any such marriage; but, it has been at some times, and in some places, as at pre- sent among the Greeks, permitted for priests and deacons, to continue with their wives which they had married before their ordination, though even this was disallowed by many ancient canons. The 27th of the apostolic canons allows none of the clergy to marry but those that are in the minor orders, that is. Lectors and Cantors. The Council of Neocsesarea, which was more ancient than that of Nice, in its first canon orders, that f a priest marries he would be deposed. The Council of Ancyra, which was held about the same time, orders the same thing with regard to deacons, except they protested at the time of their ordina- 204 CATHOLIC CHHISTIAN INSTRUCTED. tion that they could not live unmarried, and wero therefore presumed to be dispensed with by the bishop. Concil. Ancyra, Can. 10. The great Council of Nice, in the third canon, forbids clergymen to have any women in their house, except it be mother, sister, or aunt, &c. A caution, which would never have been thought on, if they had been allowed to have wives. In the West, the Council of lUiberis, which was held about the close of the third century, canon 33, commands bishops, priests, deacons and sub-deacons to abstain from their wives, under pain of degra- dation. The second Council of Aries, can. 2. or dains that no married man be made priest, unless he promise conversion, that is, to live continently. The second Council of Carthage, can. 2. ordains, that bishops, priests and deacons should live con tinently, and abstain from their wives; and this because the Apostles so taught, and all antiquity observed^ Ut quod Apostoli docuerunt, et ipsa ser- vavit antiquitas, nos quoque custodiamus. And the fifth Council of Carthage, anno 398. can. 2. ordains in like manner, that all bishops, priests and dea- cons should abstain from their wives, or be de- posed. There are many other ancient canons to the like effect, as well as decrees of the ancient popes; as of Siricius, in his epistle to Himmerius bishop of Tarragona, c. 7; of Innocent I. in his epistle to Victricius bishop of Roan, c. 9; of St. Leo the Great, epist. 82, to Anastasius, c. 3 and 4. Hence St. Epiphanius, who flourished in the East in the fourth century, in his great work, against all heresies, Ifer. 69. writes thus: *The church does not admit him to be a deacon, priest, bishop, or sub-deacon, though he be a man of one wifa, who makes use of cor\jugal embraces.' Ho adds, CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 205 that this ' is observed in those places chiefly in which canons of the church are exactly kept, which being directed by the Holy Ghost, aims always at that which is most perfect; that those who are employed in divine functions may have as little as can be of worldly distractions.' And St. Jerome, epist. 50. 'Bishops, (says he) priests and deacons are chosen either virgins or widowers, or from the time of their priesthood perpetually chaste.' He aflirms the same in his book against Vigilantius, by the name of the churches of the East, and of Egypt, and of the see Apostolic; and of all bishops, in his book against Jovinianus. See also Origen. Hom. 13. upon Numbers; Eusebius, 1. 1. Demonst. Evang. c. 9; and St. John Chrysos- tom, Homil. de PatientiaJob. If you ask the reason, why the church has in- sisted so much in all ages upon this point of dis- cipline, besides the reason alleged above out of St. Paul, 1 Cor. vii. 32, 33, 'The reason of single life for the clergy,' says Mr. Thorndyke, an emi- nent Protestant divine, in his letters at the end of Just Weights and Measures, p. 239. ' is firmly grounded by the fathers and canons of the church upon the precept of St. Paul, forbidding man and wife to part, unless for a time to attend unto pray- er, 1 Cor. vii. 5. For priests and deacons being continually to attend upon occasions of celebrating the eucharist, which ought continually to be fre- quented; if others are to abstain from the use of marriage for a time, then they always.' Thus far Mr. Thorndyke. Q. But were not the Apostles married? A. Some of them were before they were called to the apostleship; but we do not find that they had any commerce with their wives after they 1^ 18 206 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. were called by Christ. St. Jerome expressly af- firms that they had not, Epist. 50. And this seems to be clear from St. Matt. xix. 27. where St. Peter says to our Lord, ^Behold we have forsaken all things, and followed thee:' for, that amongst the ALL which they had forsaken, wives also were comprehended, is gathered from the enumeration made by our Saviour in the 29th verse, where he expressly nameth wives. Q. But does not St. Paul say. Cor. ix. 5. * Have we not power to lead about a sister, a wife, as well as other Apostles,' &c? A. The Protestant translation has wilfully cor- rupted the text in this place; it should have been translated a woman, a sister. The Apostle speaks not of his wife, for it is visible he had none, from 1 Cor. vii. 7, 8. But he speaks of such pious women, as according to the custom of the Hebrew nation, waited upon the Apostles and other teachers, serving them in necessaries; as they had done also upon our Lord in the time of his mortal life, see St. Luke viii. 2, 3. Though St. Paul, that he might be less burthensome to the faithful, chose rather to serve himself and live by the work of his own hands. Q. Does not the Apostle, 1 Tim. iii. 2. and 12, require that bishops and deacons should be *the husbands of one wife?' A, The meaning of the Apostle is not that every bishop, priest or deacon should have a wife; for he himself had none; and he declares, 1 Cor. vii. 8. ' I say to the unmarried and widows, it is good for them if they abide even as I.' But his mean- ing is, that none should be admitted to be a bishop, priest or deacon, that had been married more than once; which law has ever since been observed in CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 207 the Catholic Church: for since it was not possible in those days of the first preaching of the gos- pel (when there were few or no converts, either among the Jews or Gentiles, but such as were married) to have found a sufficient number of pro- per ministers, if they had not admitted married men, they were consequently obliged to admit such to the ministry; but still with this limitation, provided they had not been twice married. But now the church has a sufficient number of such as are trained up to a single life, and are willing to embrace perpetual continency; and therefore pre- fers such to the ministry, and is authorized so to do by the Apostle, 1 Cor. vii. 32, 33, 38. And if, after having consecrated themselves to God in this kind of life, they should be for looking back, and engaged in a married life, they are expressly con- demned by the same Apostle, 1 Tim. v. 12. Q. Is it not said, Heb. xiii. 6. * Marriage is honourable in all?' A. The Protestant translation has strained the text to make it say more thari the original, which may full as well be rendered in the imperative mood, thus: Met marriage be honourable in all, and the bed undefiled; for whoremongers and adulter- ers God will judge;' as the next verse which is rendered in the Protestant translation by the im- perative, Met your conversation be without cove- tousness,' &c. So that the true meaning of this text is, that married persons should not dishonour their holy state by any liberties contrary to the sanctity of it; but not to allow marriage to those who have chosen the better part, and consecrated themselves by vow to God. Q. But is not forbiding marriage called a doc- trine of devils? 1 Tim. iv. 3. 208 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED, A, It certainly was so in those of whom the Apostle there speaks, viz. the Gnostics, the Mar- cionites, the Encratites, the Manicheans, and many other heretics, who absolutely condemned marri- age as the work of the devil. For pur part, no body reverences marriage more than we do; for we hold it to be a sacrament, and forbid it to none but to those, that have voluntarily renounced it to consecrate themselves more wholly to the divine service: and in such as these St. Paul condemns it as much as we; see 1 Tim. v. 12. That these same heretics also condemned absolutely the use of all kinds of meat, not on fasting days only, (as was also practised by the church) but at any time whatsoever; because they looked upon all flesh to be from an evil principle. So that it is evident these were the men of whom the Apostle, 1 Tim. iv. intended to speak. Q. But do you think that a vow of continency so strictly obliges any person, that it would be a sin in such a person to marry? A. Yes, most certainly; because the law of God and nature requires that we should keep our vows to God, Deut. xxiii. 21, 22, 23. 'When thou shalt vow a vow unto the Lord thy God, thou shalt not slack to pay it: for the Lord thy God will surely require it of thee; and it would be sin in thee. But if thou shalt forbear to vow, it shall be no sin in thee. That which is gone out of thy lips thou shalt keep and perform.' Psal. Ixxvi. 11, ^Vow and pay unto the Lord your God.' Eccles. V. 4. 'Pay that which thou hast vowed. Better it is that thou shouldst not vow, than that thou shouldst vow and not pay.' For if it be a crime to break our faith with man, how much more with Godt If you say, that the state of continency is CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 209 not more acceptable to God than that of marriage, and therefore cannot be the proper matter of a vow, you contradict the doctrine of the Apostle, I Cor. vii. 38. 'He that giveth his virgin in mar- -iage, doth well j but he that giveth her not, doth letter.' Hence St. Augustine, 1. de Bono Viduitatis, c, 11. affirms, that the breach of such a vow of chastity, rs wors© than adultery: and St. John Chrysostom (ad Theodorum Lapsum) 'Though you call it marriage a thousand times, yet 1 maintain it is much worse than adultery.' Hence the Council of Illiberis, can. 13; the fourth Council of Car- thage, can. 104; and the great Council of Chalce- don, can. 15. excommunicate those who presume to marry after such a vow. What would the Church of those ages have thought of a religion introduced into the world by men that had noto- riously broken through those most solemn engage- ments, and who raised the fabric of their pretend- ed reformation upon thousands of broken vows? Q. But all have not the gift of continency; why then should the first reformers be blamed, if, find- ing they had not this gift, they ventured upon marrying with nuns? A, Continency is not required of all, but such as have by vow engaged to keep it: and therefore, before a person engages himself by vow, he ought certainly to examine whether he has a call from God, and whether he can go through with what he thinks of undertaking: but after he has once en- gaged himself by vow, he is not now at liberty to go back: but may assure himself, that the gift of continence will not be denied him, so that he uses proper means to obtain and preserve it, particu- larly prayer and mortification, which because Lu- 18* 210 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. Iher laid aside, by quitting his canonical hours of prayer and other religious exercises, to which he had been accustomed in his convent, no wonder if he lost the gift of continency, which he owns he enjoyed whilst he was a popish friar, ' Whilst I was a religious (says he) I observed chastity, obe- dience and poverty: and, in short, being wholly disengaged from the cares of this present life, I wholly gave myself up to fasting, watching and prayer; In Gal. 1. 15. t. 5. Witemb. fol. 291. 2. But as soon as he commenced reformer, to demon- strate that he was changed for the worse, he de- clares, he had so' far lost this gift, that he could not possibly live without a woman. Sermon, de Matrim. t. 5. fol. 119. 1. Q. But does not Christ say, concerning conti- nency, St. Matt. xix. 11. *A11 men cannot receive this saying:' and St. Paul, Cor. vii. 9. 'If they cannot contain, let them marry; for it is better to marry than to burn?' A. No: both these texts are wilfully corrupted in the Protestant Testament. Where he speaks not of such as have vowed chastity, but of other Christians, whom he advises rather to marry than to burn with unlawful lust here, and for unlawful lust hereafter. And the same advice is most fre- quently inculcated by Catholic divines. But as for those that have vowed chastity, they must make use of other means to prevent this burning, particu- larly prayer and fasting. But what a wretched case must that of the adversaries of the celibacy of the clergy be, when to maintain it they have in so many places wilfully corrupted the scripture? and what a melancholy case it must be, that so many thousands of w^ell meaning souls should be wretchedly deluded with the pretence of God's CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 21 1 pwre word, when instead of this, they have no- thing put in their hands but corrupted transla- tions, which present them with a mortal poison, instead of the food of life? CHAPTER XVIII. OF RELIGIOUS ORDERS AND CONFRATERNITIES. Q. What is the meaning of so many religious Orders in the Catholic Church, under different denominations; are not all Catholics of the same religion? A, Yes, certainly, all Catholics, and consequent- ly all these religious, though called by different denominations, are all of one religion, professing one and the same faith, acknowledging one and the same Church-authority, and all the decisions of the Church; subject to one and the same head, and closely united together in one communion. Q. In what then do^hese religious Orders differ one from another, if they are all of one religion? A. They differ in having different rules and constitutions prescribed by their respective foun- ders; different habits; different exercises of devo- tion and penance; different institutes; some wholly sequestered from the world, and addicted to prayer and contemplation; others employed in preaching, teaching and converting souls; others tending the sick, redeeming captives, &c. so as to make a beautiful variety in the Church of God of different companions, all tending towards Christian perfec- tion, though by different exercises, according to the spirit of their respective institutes. Q. Are not all these religious consecrated to God by certain vows? 212 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. -4, Yes: there are three vows which are com- mon to them all, viz. of poverty, chastity and obe- dience. By the vow of poverty, they renounce all property in the things of this world, so as to have nothing at their own disposal ; by the vow of chastity they renounce all carnal pleasures; and by the vow of obedience, they give up their own will to follow that of God in the person of their superior. Q. How do we know that this voluntary pov- erty, perpetual chastity, and entire obedience, are agreeable to God? A. That voluntary poverty, or renouncing the goods and possessions of this world, is agreeable to God, is evident from St. Matt. xix. 21. 'If thou jvilt be perfect, go and sell all thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have a treasure in heaven: and come and follow me.' That perpe- tual chastity is agreeable to God, is no less evi- dent, from St. Matt. xix. 12. ' There be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the king- dom of heaven's sake — he t^at is able to receive it, let him receive it.' And that an entire obedience to lawful superiors must needs be agreeable to the divine Majesty, is evident, because obedience is better than sacrifice; since by obedience we give up to God, and for God, that which is naturally most dear to us, viz. our liberty, and that which stands most in the way of our soul's welfare, viz. our own will and self-love. Q. Ought any Christians to embrace this state of life without a call from God? A, No, certainly; it would be rashness to atj tempt it. Q. How shall any person know if he have a call from God to this state of life? CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 213 A, By consulting God, his director, and his own heart In choosing a state of life every one ought to consult God, in the first place, by fervent prayer, begging daily of him like the convert: St. Paul, Acts ix. 6. 'Lord! what wilt thou have me to do?' He ought also to consult with a virtuous and pru- dent director, and to lay open to him the inclina- tions of his heart, and the motives upon which he is inclined to embrace this kind of life; for there is no better proof of a call from God than when a person, after having consulted God by prayer, finds in himself a strong inclination to a religious life, and that for a long time, and upon motives which have nothing in them of self-love, but are such as could not be suggested but by the grace of God. Q. What are the motives upon which a Chris- tian should embrace a religious life? A. To do penance for his sins; to fly from the dangers and corruptiotis of this wicked world: to consecrate himself wholly to the service of God, and sanctify himself by the exact observance of his vows, and all the exercises of a religious life; and to tend without ceasing to Christian perfection. Q. But may it not be feared, that young persons may too rashly engage themselves by vows in a \\ religious state for which they are not fit? A. To prevent this inconvenience, the Catholic Church suffers none to be professed in any order of men or women without a year's noviceship, by way of probation or trial. Q. Is a religious state of life very ancient in the Church of God? A. Yes, very ancient; for not to mention St. John Baptist's life in the wilderness, St. Luke i. 30. and the lives of the first Christians of Jerusa- 214 CATHOLIC CHKISTI AN INSTRUCTED. lem, who had all things in common, and sold their possessions and goods, continuing daily with one accord in the temple, &c.' Acts ii. 44, 45, 46, in which they exhibit a specimen of a religious life; we learn from the most certain monuments of antiquity, that even in the three first centuries there were religious men, whom Eusebius calls Ascetse, and great numbers of nuns or virgins con- secrated to God; though neither the one nor the other was as yet formed into the regular monas- teries till the beginning of the fourth century. About the middle of the third century, St. Paul the first hermit, flying from the fury'of the perse- cution begun by Decius, in the year 289, retired into the desert of Thebais, and there passed ninety years and upwards in a lonesome cave, in con- versation with God. His wonderful life is extant^ written by St. Jerome. About the year 271, St. Anthony, a young gen- tleman of Egypt, left his estate and the world to consecrate himself to a religious life. He found, at his first retirement, some others that had al- ready undertaken that kind of life, though few in number, and those living near the towns or villa- ges; but he, by his example, drew great numbers after him into the desert, and is generally looked upon as the author and father of a monastic life. His life is written by the great St. Athanasius, and is full of excellent lessons of spirituality. About the year 313, St. Pachomius retired from the world, and after having lived some time in solitude with St. Palemon, became the father of many religious, and the first founder of the famous congregation of Tabenne, to which he prescribed a rule which he had received from an angel. . ...From these beginnings, the deserts of Egypt CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTS). 215 and of Thebais, soon were peopled with innumer- able solitaries, and all those parts were full of reli- gious of both sexes of admirable virtue,* insomuch, that when Rufinus visited those countries in the latter end of the fourth century, he found in the city of Oxyrincus alone, ten thousand religious men, and twenty thousand nuns. From Egypt this kind of life, so agreeable to the principles of the gospel, and the spirit of Christian- ity, quickly spread itself through all parts of the world inhabited by christians. St. Hilarian, hav- ing learned St. Anthony's way of living, began to practise the like in Palestine about the beginning of the fourth century; and that country also was quickly replenished with religious men and wo- men: whilst St. James, afterwards bishop of Nisi- bis, St. Julian Sabas, and other great servants of God, whose lives and miracles are recorded by Theodoret in his Philotheus, propagated the same way of living in Syria and Mesopotamia. About the same time, or not long after, the deserts of Pontus and Cappadocia began also to be inhabited by religious men, whose manner of life was em- braced by those two great lights of the church, St. Gregory Nazianzen and St. Basil, the latter of which composed an excellent rule for his religious, professed to this day by the Greek and Russian monks, and by some in Poland and Italy. As for the Western parts of the church, we find that the monastic life had already gained a great footing there in the fourth century. St. Augustine |informs us of a monastery near the walls of Milan, Yull of good religious men, under the care of St. Ambrose, 1. 8. Confess, ch^. 6 ; and of several such religious societies at Rome,^ his book of the man- I ners of the Catholic Church, chap. 33; and of a 216 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. h''^ religious house near Treves, in Germany, where two courtiers, upon reading the life of St. Anthony, consecrated themselves to God, 1. 8. Confess, c. 6. And the same St. Augustine, upon his return into Africa, after his conversion, propagated the same kind of life in that part of the world also. In France, the great St. Martin, bishop of Tours, in the fourth century, whose apostolic life and miracles are recorded by Sulpicius Severus, found- ed the monastery of Marmoutier, in which he united together in one the clerical and monastical life, as St. Eusebius had done before him at Ver- celli in Piedmont. But the most famous monastery in all France was that of the isle of Lerines, found- ed towards the close of the fourth century, by St. Honoratus, afterwards bishop of Aries; which was the fruitful parent of many, great saints and illus- trious prelates. As for our British islands, though we know not the particular time when the first monasteries began to be established, yet we are assured, that we were not long behind our neighbours in en>- bracing this kind of life. The monastery of Ban- gor, in Wales, in which there were above two thousand monks was very * ancient; and we aro told of an ancient monastery at Winchester, be- fore the Saxons came over into this land. As for Ireland, St. Patrick who established Christianity there, settled also the monastic discipline amongst his converts; which from thence was propagated to the Picts in Scotland, by St. Columba, alias Columkil, the apostle of that natfon, who having first founded in Ireland the famous abbey Dear- mach, afterwards passing into Scotland, founded that of the isle of Hy^from which two monas- teries, many others, as well in Ireland as in Scot- CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 217 land, had their origin, as following the institute of the aforesaid St. Columba, of whom Ven. Bede, in his third book of Ecclesiastical History of the Eng- lish Church, chap, 4. writes thus: ^ Of whose life and words (he speaks of St. Columba) some writ- ings are said to be preserved by his disciples. But whatsoever he was himself, this we know of him for certain, that he has left successors renowned for much continency, the love of God, and regular observance.' From this monastery of the isle of Hy, St. Ai- dan, the first bishop of Lindisfarn, and many other apostolic preachers came, who preached and estab- lished Christianity among the Northern English, as St. Augustine and his companions did amongst those of the South, St. Felix amongst the East Eng- lish, and St. Birinus amongst those of the West. Q. I should be glad to know which are the chief religious Orders that flourish at present in the church of God; together with the names of their founders, the time of their first institution, &c. A. I shall endeavour to satisfy you as briefly as I can. And, first, as to the East. The Orders that flourish there, are those of St. Anthony, and of St. Basil, of which we have spoken already. In the West St. Augustine, upon his return into Africa, about the year 390, with divers others his companions, entered into a religious society, where- in he lived for three years before his coming to Hippo. And after his coming to that city, where he was first made priest, and afterwards bishop, he erected a monastery within his own house, living there with his clergy in common; to which insti- tute the c^anon regulars of Saint Augustine owe their original, who have flourished ever since in the church of God, and have branched out into 218 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. divers congregations, as that of Saint John Latern, that of Saint Victor, of Saint Genovesa, Ji Lord! this ring, which we bless »J* in thy name, that she that shall wear it, keeping inviolable fidelity to her spouse, may ever remain in peace and in thy will, and always live in mu- tual charity. Through Christ our Lord. Amen. Then the priest sprinkles the ring with holy water; and the bridegroom taking it, puts it on the fourth finger of the left hand of the bride, saying, ^ In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. Amen.' Here also, according to the custom of Ireland, the bridegroom puts some gold and silver into the hand of the bride, saying, * With this ring I thee wed, this gold and silver I give thee, and with all my worldly goods I Ihee endow.' After this the priest says, F. Confirm, O God ! this which thou hast wrought in us. A. From thy holy temple which is in Jerusalem. Lord ! have mercy on us. Christ! have mercy on us. Lord! have mercy on us. Our Father, &c. And lead us not into temptation. A, But deliver us from evil. V. Save thy servants. A. Trusting in thee, O my God! F. Send them help, O Lord! from thy sanctuary. A. And defend them from Sion. F. Be to them, O Lord! a tower of strength. A, Against the face of the enemy. F. O Lord ! hear my prayer. A, And let my cry come to thee. F. The Lord be with you. A. And with thy spirit. Let us pray. Look down, O Lord! we beseech thee, upon those thy servants, and afford thy favourable as- sistance to thy own institution, by which thou hast ordained the propagatioq of mankind; and that CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 227 they, who are joined together by thy authority, may be preserved by thy aid. Through Christ our Lord. Amen. Fifthly, after this, if the nuptial .benediction is to be given, the priest says the Mass appointed in the Missal, for the bridegroom and the bride; and having said the Pater Nosier , turning about to the new married couple, he says over them the follow- ing prayers. Let us pray. Mercifully give ear, O Lord! to our prayers, and let thy grace accompany this thy institution, by which thou hast ordained the propagation of mankind; that this tie, which is made by thy au- thority, may be preserved by thy grace. Through our Lord Jesus Christ, &c. Let us pray. O God! who by thy omnipotent hand didst create all things of nothing; who at the first forming of the world, having made man to the likeness of God, didst out of his flesh make the woman, and give her to him for his help, and by this didst inform us that what in its beginning was one, ought never be separated: O God! who by so ex- cellent a mystery hast consecrated this union of both sexes, that thou wouldst have it be a type of that great sacrament which is betwixt Christ and his church: O God! by whom this contract and mutual commerce has been ordained, and privi- leged with a blessing, which alone has not been recalled, either in punishment of original sin, or by the sentence, of the flood, mercifully look on this thy servant the bride, who being now to be given in marriage, earnestly desires to be received 228 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. under thy protection. May love and peace abound in her, may she marry in Christ faithful and chaste, may she ever imitate those holy women of former times, may she be as acceptable to her husband as Rachel, as discreet as Rebecca, may she in her years and fidelity be like Sarah, and may the author of evil at no time have any share in her actions; may she be steady in faith and the commandments; may she be true to her engage- ments, and flee all unlawful addresses; may she fortify her infirmity by thy discipline, may she be gravely bashful, venerably modest, and well learn- ed in the doctrine of heaven; may she be fruitful in her offspring; may she be approved and inno- cent; and may her happy lot be to arrive at length to the rest of the blessed in the kingdom of heaven; may they both see their children's children to the third and fourth generation, and live to a happy old age. Through the same Lord Jesus Christ, &c. After the priest's communion, they both receive the blessed sacrament, and in the end of the Mass, before the usual blessing of the people, the priest turns to the bridegroom and bride, and says. The God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob be with you, and may he fulfil his blessing in you, that you may see your children's children to the third and fourth generation, and afterwards enter into the possession of everlasting life, by the help of our Lord Jesus Christ; who, with the Father; and the Holy Ghost, liveth and reigneth God for ever and ever. Amen. Then the priest admonishes them to be faithful to one another, to love one another, and to live in the fear of God, and exhorts them to be con- tinent, by mutual consent, at the times of devo- CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 229 tion, and especially at the times of fasting, ant^ of great solemnities, and so he finishes the Mas? in the usual manner. Q. Is there any obligation of receiving thi? nuptial benediction when persons are married? A, The church wishes that it were never omit ted in the first marriage, when it may be had, be- cause of the blessing it draws down from heaven, and it would certainly be a fault for persons to marry without it, when and where it may be had. Q- Why does not the church allow of this nup- tial benediction, when the man or woman has been once married before? A, Before the second marriage does not so per- fectly represent the union of Christ and his church, which is an eternal tie of one to one. Q. Why does not the church allow of the so- lemnity of marriage from the first Sunday of Ad- vent till after Twelfth day, and from Ash- Wednes- day till after Low-Sunday? A. Because the times of Advent and Lent are times of penance, as the times of Christmas and Easter are times of extraordinary devotion, and therefore are not proper for marriage feasts, or such like solemnities. Q. What are the duties of married people to one another? A, You shall hear them from Scripture. Ephes. V. 22. ^Let women be subject to their husbands, as to the Lord.' Ver. 23. 'Because the man is the head of the woman, as Christ is the head of the church: he is the Saviour of his body.' Ver. 24. ' Therefore, as the church is subject to Christ, so also let women be to their husbands in all things.' Ver. 25. 'Husbands love your wives, as Christ also loved the church, and delivered him- 20 230 CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. self for it.' Ver. 28. ^So ought also husbands to love their wives as their own bodies: he that loveth his wife, loveth himself.' Ver. 29. ' For no one ever hated his own flesh, but nourisheth it, and cherisheth it, as Christ also doth the church.' Ver. 30. 'Because we are members of his body, of his flesh, and of his bones.' Ver. 31. 'For this cause shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall adhere to his wife, and they shall be two in one flesh.' (Gen. ii.) Ver. 32. 'This sacrament is great, but I say in Christ and in the church.' Ver. 33. ' However, let every one of you in parti- cular love his wife as himself; and let the wife reverence the husband.' See to the same effect, Colos. iii. 18, 19. 1 St. Peter iii. 11. 'Let women be subject to their husbands, to the end, that if any believe not the word, they be gained without the word by the conversation of the women.' Ver. 2. ' Beholding your chaste conversation in fear.' Ver. 3. ' Whose adorning let it not be in the outward plaiting of the hair, or laying on gold round about, or putting on apparel.' Ver. 4. ' But the hidden man of the heart, in the incorruptibility of a quiet and modest spirit, which is rich in the sight of God.' Ver. 5. 'For in this manner heretofore also holy women, hoping in God, adorned themselves, being subject to their husbands.' Ver. 6. 'As Sarah obeyed Abra- ham, calling him Lord, whose daughters you are,' (fee. Ver. 7. ' Husbands, in like manner, dwelling with them according to knowledge, give honour to the woman as to the weaker vessel, as to the joint heirs of the grace of life, that your prayers may not be hindered.' 1 Cor. vii. 3. ' Let the husband render the (mar- riage) debt to the wife; and in like manner the CATHOLIC CIIRISTIAJN INSTRUCTED. 231 wife to her husband.' Ver. 4. ' The wife hath not power of her own body, but the husband; and in like manner the husband hath not power of his own body but the wife.' Ver. 5. 'Defraud not one another, unless perhaps by consent for a time, that you may give yourselves to prayer, and return again together to the same, lest satan tempt you on account of your incontinency.' Ver. 6. 'Yet this I speak according to indulgence, not according to command.' ' Ver. 7. 'For I would have you all to be as myself,' &c. Ver. 10. 'But as to them who are joined in wedlock, it is not I but the Lord commands that the wife depart not from the hus- band.' Ver. 11. 'But if she shall depart that she remain unmarried, or be reconciled to her husband: and let not the husband put away his wife.' Titus ii, 4. ' They may teach the young women prudence, that they love their husbands, be tender of their children.' Ver. 5. ' Discreet, chaste, sober, having care of the house, gentle, submissive to their husbands, that the word of God be not blasphemed.' There are also excellent documents for married people in the book of Tobias, ch. vi. 16. 'Then the angel Raphael said to him, hear me, and I will shew thee who they are over whom the devil can prevail.' Ver. 17. 'For they who in such manner receive matrimony as to shut out God from them- selves and from their mind, and to give themselves to their lust, as the horse and the mule, which have not understanding: over them the devil hath power.' Ver. 22. 'Thou shalt take the virgin with the fear of the Lord, moved rather for the love of children than for lust, that in the seed of Abraham thou mayest obtain blessing in children.' And chap. iii. 16. 'Thou knowest. Lord! that I never coveted a husband, and have kept my soul 2^^ CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. Clean from all concupiscence.' Ver. 16.^1 never kept company with them t,hat play, nor with them that walk in lightness did I make myself a part- ner.' Ver. 17. 'But a husband I consented to take, with thy fear, not with my lust.' And chap. iii. 8. 'Thou madest Adam of the slime of the earth, and gavest him Eve for his helpmate.' Ver. 9. 'And now. Lord! thou knowest that not for fleshly lust do I take my sister to wife, but only for the love of posterity, in which thy name m.ay be blessed for ever.' Q. What are the duties of married people with i^gard to the education of their children? A, They are obliged to train them up from their vfiry infancy in the fear of God, and to give them early impressions of piety; to see that they be instructed in the Christian Doctrine, and that they be kept to their prayers and other religious duties; in fine, to give them good example, and to remove from them the occasions of sin, especially bad com- pany and idleness. Q. Does the Catholic Church allow her children to marry with those that are not of her communion? A. She has often prohibited such marriages, as may be seen in the sixteenth canon of the Council of Illiberis, the 10th canon of the Council of Laodicea, the 14th canon of the Council of Chalcedon, the 67th canon of the Council of Agde, &:c. Though some- times, and in some places, pastors of the church, for weighty reasons, have been forced to dispense with this law, and to celebrate such marriages.' Q. Why is the church so averse to these kind of marriages? A, First, because she would not have her chil- dren communicate in sacred things, such as matri- mony is, with those that are out of her communion. CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTED. 233 Secondly, because such marriages are apt to give occasion to dissensions in families, whilst one of the parties draw one way, the other another. Thirdly, because there is a danger of the Catholic party being perverted, or at least of not being allowed the free exercise of religion. Fourthly, because there is a danger of the children being brought up in error, of which we have seen some sad instances. Where note, that those bargains are by no means to be allowed of, by which the con- tracting parties agree to have the boys brought up m the religion of the father, and the girls to follow ehe mother. God and his church will have no such division, nor give up thus their right to any one. CHAPTER XX. OF THE CHURCHING OF WOMEN AFTER CHILD BEARING. Q. What is the meaning of the churching of women after child bearing? b it that you look Bpon them to be under any uncleanness, as form- erly in the old law, or to be any-ways out of the rhurch by child bearin