LIBRARY OF CONGRESS. (hap Copyright No BT£4 B^ slielL 29 <* UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THE PROGRESS OF DOCTRINE NEW TESTAMENT, CONSIDERED IN EIGHT LECTURES DELIVERED BEFORE THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD by y THOMAS DEHANY BEKNAED, M.A., OP EXETEE COLLEGE, AND EECTOE OF WALCOT. WITH AN INTRODUCTORY NOTE BY REV. T. W. CHAMBERS, D. D. AMERICAN TRACT S-OCIETY, 10 EAST 23d STREET, NEW YORK. COPYRIGHT, 1896, BY AMERICAN TRACT SOCIETY. INTRODUCTORY NOTE. The Bampton Lectures of Mr. Bernard were first issued in 1864, and since that time have been continuously before the public, the work having been often reprinted both in Great Britain and America. Its one theme, the " Progress of Doctrine in the New Testa- ment," was by no means a novelty, but never before had it been presented in a popular yet lucid and convincing form. Hence the wide acceptance and great usefulness of the book. The present prominence of Biblical theology in the church's view has rather deepened than lessened the general interest in the subject. The Bible has more and more come to be regarded as the historical record of God's self-revelation to the children of men. As progress undeniably characterized the various stages of this revelation in the Old Testament, it was natural to expect the same in the New. And the fact of such progress has been generally admitted. It is true that the Lord Jesus Christ is the great revealer of God, and his life and teachings are faithfully recorded in the Gospels. But very much of the truth wrapped up in his person and work could not be fully explained and understood until after his death and resurrection, and especially after the outpouring of the Holy Spirit on Pentecost. The germs of the whole system were indeed uttered by him in the course of his ministry, but the disciples, even the Twelve, were slow of heart to comprehend. And the Master himself, as Mr. Bernard reminds us (p. 97), told them, " I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now." Therefore he made provision, by sending the Paraclete, that these " many things " should not be lost, but subsequently put on record for the guidance and comfort of his people. The Acts, Epistles and Apocalypse contain this fur- ther disclosure of the Saviour's work and will, and so make the vol- ume of revelation a complete, rounded whole, in which nothing is lacking. The agency of the Holy Spirit guarantees the accuracy of the writings of the Apostles, so that what they say is of equal valid- 4 INTRODUCTORY NOTE. ity with any utterances of the Lord Jesus. Oftentimes, indeed, it is of greater value, because it fully unfolds what could be given by him only in outline, or what was entirely withheld in view of the in- competency of the disciples to bear it. It is the more important to have this point unfolded in the lucid discourses of Mr. Bernard, because in our day there is a pronounced tendency to overlook the Apostolic development of truth under the pretext of a return to Christ. But it may well be questioned if any man, no matter how endowed by nature or matured by grace, can get nearer to the heart of Jesus or be a more faithful mouthpiece of his views than Saul of Tarsus. It is true there are traces of his Rabbinical education in his writings, and these have sometimes been objected to as deteriorating the excellence and usefulness of what he says. But there is no possibility of separating these fea- tures from the rest of the Apostle's writings, and the inspiring Spirit must certainly have preserved him from any undue use of what he had learned before his conversion. On this point it is well to quote the words of the veteran scholar of Neuchatel, the acute and learned Prof. Godet, as given in his latest work, " Introduction to the New Testament " (p. 16). After referring to Pfleiderer's view of the rabbinical character of Paul's exegesis, both liberal and alle- gorical, and citing the cases alleged, he says, " I believe that in sev- eral of these cases Paul's explanation is fully justified (as Gal. 3:16; Rom. 4:17 and 10 : 6, et seq.), and that in other cases the typology of the Apostle entirely differs from the rabbinical allegories in this, that the two things compared by Paul always rest upon a common moral law that warrants the putting them together (1 Cor. 9:9; Gal. 4:21), while in the ordinary allegorical explanation the things brought together are so artificially, and only touch by an accidental feature. But I do not mean to say, notwithstanding, that a man who had not passed through the rabbinical gymnastics would have always argued as Paul does. Only it must be well observed that this was for him only a process of demonstration and not the means by which he had reached the very basis of his ideas. That basis he possessed before writing, and he the more willingly employed the Old Testament to defend it, that that was the authority his adver- INTRODUCTORY NOTE. 5 saries invoked against him : * Ye that desire to be under the law, do ye not hear the law?' (Gal. 4:21.) It was a kind of argument ad homine?n." To the same effect speaks Bishop Lightfoot (Galat. 196-7) concerning Paul and Philo's use of Hagar and Sarah : " Both allegorize and touch upon the same points in the narrative. Yet in their whole tone and method they stand in direct contrast, and their results have nothing in common. Philo is wholly unhistorical. With St. Paul, on the other hand, Hagar's career is an allegory, be- cause it is a history. The symbol and the thing symbolized are the same in kind. This simple passage of patriarchal life represents in miniature the workings of God's providence hereafter to be exhibited in greater proportions in the history of the Christian church . . . With Philo, the .allegory is the whole substance of his teaching ; with Paul, it is but an accessory. He uses it rather as an illustra- tion than an argument, as a means of representing in a lively form the lessons before enforced on other grounds. It is, to use Luther's comparison, the painting which decorates the house already built." In Fairbairn's " The Place of Christ in Modern Theology " occurs the following passage (p. 450) : " We cannot accept Luther's article of a standing or a falling Church as our principium essendi. It is Paul's rather than Christ's ; it may be true, but it still remains what it was at first — a deduction by a disciple, not a principle enun- ciated by the Master." Here there is a reversal of the view held by the historic church from the beginning, that the entire New Testa- ment is the norm of faith, and that a distinct utterance by an in- spired Apostle is as authoritative as one of our Lord's own sayings. Under the pretext of doing honor to Christ his own express teach- ing is denied, and his gracious promise of the Comforter to lead the disciples into " all the truth " is emptied of its meaning. The same able writer in another place (p. 293) gives utterance to very remarkable views. After saying that we can now trace the degree in which the Master transcends the disciples, not the way they develop his teaching, but how they fail to do it, he proceeds : " Where Paul is greatest is where he is most directly under the influence or in the hands of Jesus, evolving the content of what he had received concerning him ; where he is weakest is where his old 6 INTRODUCTORY NOTE. scholasticism or his new antagonism dominates alike the form and substance of his thought. So with John : what in him is perma- nent and persuasive is of Christ ; what is local and even trivial is of himself. To exhibit in full the falling off in the apostles cannot be attempted here ; enough to say their conception of God is, if not lower, more outward, less intimate, or, as it were, from within ; nor does it, with all its significance as to the absolute paternity, penetrate like a subtle yet genial spirit their whole mind, all their thought and all their being." The necessary result of such teachings is to create an impassable gulf between the gospels and the epistles, to darken the whole subject of inspiration, and to do grievous dishonor to the Holy Ghost. It takes a large part of the New Testament away from the rule of faith and subjects it to the judgment of the reader how far it represents the consciousness of Christ. It exaggerates the human element in the epistles so as to obscure and abridge the di- vine, and in fact leaves us with a mutilated standard of belief and practice. It is, therefore, peculiarly appropriate to issue anew a work such as Mr. Bernard's, which is written without any tinge of a con- troversial spirit, and yet presents the common judgment of the church with clearness and accuracy. One might prefer that in ana- lyzing the Pauline writings he had followed the chronological order, yet the author gives (pp. 166-7) satisfactory reasons for following the arrangement which occurs in the common English Bible, his object being not to show the relations of each one to the others, but rather their common characteristic as containing the fullness and maturity of Christian doctrine. He describes progress in its natural way as not a correction of what had gone before, but a further unfolding of the words and work of the blessed Master, and thus presents a com- plete statement of religious truth, in which every doctrine and pre- cept finds its appropriate place, and ample materials are furnished for constructing a full-orbed and symmetrical system of theology and ethics. TALBOT W. CHAMBERS. Nov. 20, 1894. EXTRACT FROM THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF THE LATE REV. JOHN BAMPTON, CANON OF SALISBURY. ..." I give and bequeath my Lands and Estates to the Chan- cellor, Masters, and Scholars of the University of Oxford for- ever, to have and to hold all and singular the said Lands or Es- tates upon trust, and to the intents and purposes hereinafter men- tioned ; that is to say, I will and appoint iaat the Vice-Chancellor of the University of Oxford for the time, being shall take and re- ceive all the rents, issues, and profits thereof, and (after all taxes, reparations, and necessary deductions made) that he pay all the remainder to the endowment of Eight Divinity Lecture Sermon3, to be established forever in the said University, and to be per- formed in the manner following : 44 1 direct and appoint, that, upon the first Tuesday in Easter Term, a Lecturer be yearly chosen by the Heads of Colleges only, and by no others, in the room adjoining to the Printing- House, between the hours of ten in the morning and two in the afternoon, to preach eight Divinity Lecture Sermons, the year following, at St. Mary 1 s in Oxford, between the commencemeia of the last month in Lent Term, and the end of the third week in Act Term. " Also I direct and appoint, that the eight Divinity Lecture Sermons shall be preached upon either of the following subjects — to confirm and establish the Christian Faith, and to confute all heretics and schismatics — upon the divine authority of the holy Scriptures — upon the authority of the writings of the primitive Fathers, as to the faith and practice of the primitive Church — upon the Divinity of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ — upon the Divinity of the Holy Ghost — upon the Articles of the Chris- tian Faith, as comprehended in the Apostles' and Nicene Creeds. " Also I direct, that thirty copies of the eight Divinity Lecture Sermons shall always be printed, within two months after they are preached ; and one copy shall be given to the Chancellor of the University, and one copy to the Head of every College, and one copy to the Mayor of the city of Oxford, and one copy to be put into the Bodleian Library ; and the expense of printing them shall be paid out of the revenue of the* Land or Estates given for establishing the Divinity Lecture Sermons ; and the preacher shall flot be paid, nor be entitled to the revenue, before they are printed. '* Also I direct and appoint, that no person phall be qualified to preach the Divinity Lecture Sermons, unless ho hath taken the degree of Master of Arts at least, in one of the two Universities of Oxford or Cambridge; and that the same person sha)J neve/ preach the Divinity Lecture Sermons twice." PREFACE. The title given to these Lectures may perhaps suggest differ ent expectations as to their scope. It may appear to some to announce an intention of drawing from the New Testament materials for a historical inquiry into the growth of christian doc- trine, as it took place in the minds and under the hands of the Apostles. To others it may indicate a purpose of showing that the New Testament itself exhibits a scheme of progressive doc- trine, fashioned for permanent and universal use. The Lectures will be found to address themselves not to the first, but to the second of these attempts; not examining the New Testament collection in order to ascertain the chronological sequence of fact, but contemplating it, as it is, for the purpose of observing the actual sequence of thought. In so doing, we are concerned, not only with the component parts of the New Testament, b.it with the order in which they are placed. On this subject soma prefatory words are needed, lest it should seem that the order here followed has been adopted merely because it comes natu- rally to us, as that with which we are familiar in our own Bibles. When this particular arrangement of books, which may be, and often have been, otherwise arranged, is treated as involving a course of progressive teaching, it may seem that an unwarrant- able stress is laid on an accidental order, which some may regard as litlle more than a habit of the pi inter and the binder. The XU PREFACE. Lectures themselves ought to give the answer to this idea ; for if the familiar order does exhibit a sequence of thought and a sus- tained advance of doctrine, then the several documents are in their right places, according to the highest kind of relation which they can bear to each other ; and if they had come into our handa vaiiously and promiscuously arranged, it would yet be incumbent on one who would study them as a whole, to place them before him in the same, or nearly the same, order as that which they have actually assumed. It will be seen that the importance here ascribed to the order of the books is ascribed strongly to its chief divisions, and more faintly to its details. The four Gospels, the Book of Acts, the collection of Epistles, and the Apocalypse, are regarded as sev- erally exhibiting definite stages in the course of divine teaching, which have a natural fitness to succeed each other. Within these several divisions, the order of the four Gospels is treated as hav- ing an evident doctrinal significance (Lecture II.), and a certain measure of propriety and fitness is attributed to the relative po- sitions of the Pauline and the Catholic Epistles, and again in a less degree to that of the several Pauline Epistles themselves. (Lecture VI.) But while it belongs to the scope of the Lectures to point out reasons of internal fitness for a certain arrangement of the books of the New Testament, it does not enter into their design to dis- cuss the subject on its other side, and to treat of the custom of the Church in regard to the order of the canon. Yet this is a point on which, in some minds, inquiry will naturally arise, and to them some short account of the state of the case is due. ]n speaking of the custom of the Church, it must first be re- membered, that the New Testament was not given and received PREFACE. X1U as one volume, but that it grew together by recognition and use. As the several books gradually coalesced into unity, it might be expected that there would be many varieties of arrangement, but that they would on the whole tend to assume their relative places, according to the law of internal fitness, rather than on any othei principle which might exercise a transient influence, as, for in- stance, that of the relative dignity of the names of their authors, or that of their chronological production or recognition. In fact, this tendency shows itself at once, in the earliest period to which our inquiries are carried back by extant manuscripts, by cata- logues of the sacred books given by ancient writers, and by the habitual arrangement of the oldest versions. A short summary of the testimony derived from these sources is given in the first Note in the Appendix, by reference to two writers whose works have laid the Church under no common obligations. (') From that review of the case, it will be apparent that the order in which we now read the books of the New Testament is that which, on the whole, they have tended to assume ; and that the general internal arrangement, by which the entire collection forms for us a consecutive course of teaching, has been suffi- ciently recognized by the instinct, and fixed by the habit, of the Church. It remains to add a word of explanation as to the method in which the Progress of Doctrine in the New Testament has been here treated. Two ways of handling the subject may suggest themselves : one, that of exhibiting the gradual development of particular doctrines, through successive stages of the divine course of instruction ; the other, that of marking the characteristics and functions of those stages themselves as parts of a progressive (l)Xumbeis within parentheses, in the text, refer to Notes at the close of ttu volume; those urithout parentheses, to foot-notes. XIV PREFACE. scheme. The first method would be suited to the purpose of proving the fact of the progress of doctrine ; the second, to the purpose of showing that that fact involves the unity of a divine plan, and therefore the continuity of a divine authority. The latter purpose appeared the more likely to be practically useful, at least in the present day. The advanced character of the doctrine in some books, as compared with others, is indeed sufficiently obvi- ous, and is not only admitted, but sometimes exaggerated into a supposed incongruity, or even inconsistency, in the views of the sacred writers. It was, then, not the reality of the progress of doctrine, but the true character of it, which seemed especially to solicit attention ; and in this point of view the subject is here considered. It was in fact originally suggested by the strong disposition, evinced by some eminent writers and preachers, to'make a broad separation between the words of the Lord and the teaching of his Apostles, and to treat the definite statements of doctrine in the Epistles, rather as individual varieties of opinion on the reve- lation recorded in the Gospels, than as the form in which the Lord Jesus has perfected for us the one revelation of himself. Such a habit of thought must frustrate the provision which our great Teacher has made for enduing those that believe on his name with the vigor of a distinct and the repose of a settled faith. One of the most effectual safeguards against that danger will be found in an intelligent appreciation of the progressive plan on which God has taught us in his written Word : and if the view which is taken in these Lectures of the range of New Testa- ment teaching should, in an} T quarter and in any measure, con- tribute to that end, the prayer which has been associated with their preparation will have received its answer. In all our works the first and the last resort is the thought of that mercy which PREFACE. X* aiwvtra prayer. I h^ve need to revert to it now. One who has taken up a subject connected with the Holy Word, under a strong sense of the usefulness which may belong to a due exposition of it, must lesl a proportionate sorrow in the review of an inade- quate treatment. But it is enough. The desires and the regrets which attend our ministrations in the Lord's household are better ottered to God than to man. For one defect only it seems right to offer an excuse. I think that many of the points, which in the Lectures are necessarily touched in a cursory manner, ought to have been more fully worked out and illustrated in Notes and References; and it would certainly have been a satisfaction, in rapidly skirting the confines of so many fields of recent and laborious study, to bor- row contributions from writers by whom they have been thor- oughly explored. Only a few such additions have been made, as they occurred at the moment. I may be allowed to plead that the circumstances in which I was placed during the preparation of these Lectures have made it impossible for me to do more. Scarcely had this office been confided to me, before I was called to enter on the care of a parish of fifteen thousand souls, the affairs of which required immediate, and have compelled almost incessant attention. Of the effect of this pressure of duties it will not be proper for me to say more, than that it has caused tlta omission which is here acknowledged. ANALYSIS OF THE LECTURES. LECTURE I. THE NEW TESTAMENT. {page 25.) St. John xvii. 8. Subject proposed. Its connection with the ministry of the word, and with tlM present tendencies of thought. I. Preliminary positions. 1. There is divine teaching in the New Testament— doctrine given by th« Father to the Son— by the Son to men. 2. The divine teaching coincides in extent with the New Testament. Not tc be restricted to words of the Lord in the flesh. Effect of such restrio tion. Forbidden by the Lord's words. Not to be extended through the whole Christian age. Progress of doctrine through all Church history— is a progress of apprehension by man, not of communication by God. Nc advance in divine teaching after the apostolic age ever admitted by thfc Church. 8. The plan of the divine teaching ia represented In the New Testament. Is what sense it can be said that it exhibits a scheme of doctrine progres- sively developed. EL Outlines of the subject. 1. Reality of the progress of doctrine. Visible in the Old Testament— in the New Testament. 2. Stages in the progress of doctrine in the New Testament — marked by Gos- pels, Acts, Epistles, Apocalypse. 8. Principles of the progress of doctrine In the New Testament --constituted by the relations of the doctrine (a) to its Author, (6) to the facts on whicfc xv li XV111 CONTENTS. it Is founded, [c) to the human mind, (d) of the several parts of the trine to each other. garvey of the New Testament as a progressive scheme. LECTURE H. THE GOSPELS. (PAGE 63.) St. Mark i. 1. The beginning of the Gospel. The whole life and ministry of Christ on earth may be thus described— represented in the New Testament by the four Gospels I. The Gospel. Collection in its relation to the whole New Testa- ment forms the initiatory stage of a progressive plan. Fitted to this place and function, as presenting the person of Christ. Effect of the transparent style — of the fourfold repetition — of the fourfold variation. Communica- tion of personal knowledge of Jesus Christ is the beginning of the Gospel. II. The Gospel Collection in itself exhibits a progressive plan— (1) in the division of two distinct stages ; (2) in the character of the synoptic Gospels relatively to each other; (3) in the character of St. John's Gospel relatively to the others. Unity of the whole representation — one Lord Jesus Christ. Unity and progress in the parts imply design in the whole — the Holy Ghosl the designer. The Gospel Collection, in its general effect, prepares us for further teaching bj creating the want, giving the pledge, depositing the material, and providing th< safeguard. LECTURE in. THE GOSPELS. (page 77.) Heb. iii. 3. The Lord himself the first Teacher. Hie personal teaching in the Gospels fie taitl&tory. CONTENTS. XIX L 1. Includes the substance of all Christian doctrine. Its occasional character— bul the occasions pre-ordained. Instances of pregnant sayings. 2. Yet does not bear the character of finality— a. in its form— b. in its method— c. in its substance— as moral teaching, full and open, as revelation of a mystery, reserved and anticipatory. The mystery being fundamental to the ethic, this reserve creates the need of further teaching. Instances in the doctrine of Forgiveness of sin and Acceptance in prayer. II. 1. 7s a visibly progressive system. Comparison of the first and the last discourses, Matt, v.-vii. and John xiv.-xvii. 2, Yet declares itself incomplete, and refers us to a subsequent stage of teaching. Transitional character of the last discourse. Plain assertions of incomplete- ness. Promises of things to be spoken after. The personal teachings of Christ to be completed in the dispensation of the Spirit. Saving purpose of the whole testimony, which only attains its end in those who ' have life through his name." LECTUEE IV. THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES. {page 102.) Acts i. 1-4. The Gospels and the Acts linked together as parts of one scheme— the obi commencing, the other continuing, the teaching of Jesus Christ. Two points tc be observed in the second stage of divine teaching in the New Testament. I. The Teacher is the same. Evidence of this. The Book of Acts is a record of the personal action of the Lord Jesus in the perfecting of his word and the formation of his Church. The method of this action : — 1. Special interventions. Survey of the*-;. Given at critical moments, and at the steps of progress — particularly in the history of St. Paul. Relations of the course of action to the course of doctrine, — as the pledge of its authority— as the means of its completion. Testimony of the Epistles to this personal action of the Lord in the progress of doctrine. St. Paul'? statements as to the sources of his doctrine. & EaUtutd guidance of the Apostles bv the Holy Ghost. Nature of tru gift &t Pentecost — shown, from tne promise, irom the facts, and from the XX CONTENT 8. testimony of the Apostles, to have involved the Gospel l*3elf. Hence i divine authority attaches to the whole Apostolic teaching, in its interpret tations and inferences as well as in its witness of facts. II. The method is changed. Reason for the change. The change is a siioi and means of progress. The history of salvation being finished, must be followed by the interpretation of it, and by the exhibition of its effects in human consciousness. This is achieved by the change in the method :f divine teaching, signified by the words, " He dwelleth loith you and Bhi Jl be in you." Action of the indwelling Spirit to be distinguished according to its purpose — in the founders of the Church to communicate truth — la the members of the Church to receive it. LECTURE V. THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES. (pa OB 127.) Acts v. 42. Further questions to be answered by the Book of Acts. Its purpose to answer tLem. Character and scheme of the Book. Its place and function in the evolu- tion of doctrine. L It gives the general character of the christian doctrine in its second stage. 1. A Preaching of Christ. Comparison of the preaching recorded in the Gospels and that recorded in the Acts — the one of the kingdom, the other of the person. The difference in the preaching accounts for the difference in the effect. 2. A preaching of the work of Christ, in its main features and theb results — of his death as the source of forgiveness, of his resurrection as the source of life. Progress of doctrine in the iumming up and expoai- tion of the past. II. It gives the course of events through which the doctrine was matured. Outlines of the history in this point of view. The doctrine cleared and formed in the course of this history, chiefly in respect of two principles : o. The Gospel is the substitute for the jjaw — Jewish theory of the Law— Judaking attempts negatived ana superseded; b. The Gospel is the he* CONTENTS. XXI of the Lata— inheriting its ideas and its Scriptures. St. Paul's conflict foi these positions. Largeness of the results deduced from them in the Epistles. Value of a divine summing up of the meaning and effects of the manifestatioi of Christ. LECTURE VI, THE EPISTLES. {PAGE 151.) Rom. i. 17. Marks of the continuity of doctrine, in passing from the Acts to the Epistles. The point at which the Book of Acts leaves us— it has presented the Gospel as a system, but, 1, in its external aspect — all the discourses in the Book are addressed to those who are not yet Christians; 2, as a doctrine in outline— coextensive with the Apostles' Creed. Need of further divine teaching. The Epistles are the voice of the Spirit within the Church to those who are within it— presenting the internal aspect of the Gospel, and filling up its outlines by perfecting the christian faith and educating the christian life. The Epistles are fitted for this work by their I. Form. The Epistolary form peculiar to the New Testament— indicates fel- lowship—addresses itself to actual life, and various conditions of mind. II. Method. One of reasoning, interpretation of Old Testament Scriptures, utterance of personal feelings and convictions— is a method ot association rather than of authority, of education rather than of information, yet per- vaded by authority, and blended with direct revelation. HI. Authorship. Chiefly that of St. Paul, who had not been with Jesus and was born out of due time. Inference, that these writings form a stage of doctrine in advance of that in the Gospels, as showing the results of ma manifestation of Christ. The same kind of teaching in the Catfcalic Epistles, by four other authors, chosen representatives of the Twelve. Z\. Relative characters. (1) St. Paul's Epistles, grouped and character* ized, form a body of doctrine. (2) Need and effect of the Epistle to th« Hebrews. (3) The Catholic Epistles confirmatory and supplementary. The Epistles a provision for the exigencies of the christian life. The exigenciei Bast be known— the provision must to umo. XX11 CONTENTS. LECTURE VH. THE EPISTLES. (PAGE 177.) 1 Cor. i. 30. The doctrine in the Epistles, as a stage in advance of the doctrine in the pre seding books, is distinguished by I. Its General Character — -a doctrine of the life in Christ— shows the ful filment, and gives the interpretation, of the promise, " At that day ye shaii know that I am in the Father, and ye in me, and I in you." Discrimina- tion of the points in the promise. In the Epistles all things are " in Christ Jesus." Need of a correspondence with this character in our own habit of mind. II. Particular doctrines A3 affected by this general character. Examples. (1) Doctrine of salvation— in the Gospels— in the Epistles. Ineneased definiteness, especially as to the consciousness of atonement and redemption. (2) Doctrine of adoption— in the Gospels — in the Epistles. The form of it fuller — the ground of it clearer. A new sense of it from the gift of the Spirit. (3) Doctrine of worship— In the Gospels — in the Epistles. Plainer revelation of access by sacrifice — by mediation — in the Iloly Ghost. (4) Ethical doctrine — in the Gospels— in the Epistles. Advanced to a higher point by the knowledge of higher relations, motives, and powers found " in Christ Jesus." Retrospect of the course of doctrine— its unity and progress. Our personal daty in regard to It. LECTURE VIII. THE APOCALYPSE. (page 200.) Rev. x x i. 2. The Apocalypse fulfils the promise, " lie shall show you things to come "—and completes the line of history and prophecy. Is related to the last discourse in St. Matthew, as the Epistles are to that in St. John. The Lord himself is still the revealer. CONTENTS. XX111 Connection between the progress of prophecy and the progress of doctrine. Doctrinal bearing of the book in I. The want which it supposes— concerned witli the destinies of the body, the Church. The corporate life distinguished from the individual life in the Epistles. Contrast between the ideal character of the Church and the indi- cations of its actual history. In the later epistles the tokens and revela- tions of the future grow darker. Thus a want has been created which de- mands a further word of God. State of mind to which the Book is ad- dressed. II. The satisfaction which it provides— as being a doctrine of consumma- tion. 1. A doctrine of the Cause of the consummation. The personal salvation of the individual and the general salvation of the Church have the same ground, namely, the Atoning Sacrifice,— implied by "the Lamb," as the Apocalyptic name of Christ, 2. A doctrine of the History of the consummation— showing the inner nature of events— by connecting things seen with things not seen— by presenting the eaTth as the battle-field of spiritual powers. 3. A doctrine of the Coming of the Lord— the announcement of this is the key- note of the Book— all else a part of this. In the Epistles the coming is con- nected chiefly with the personal life— here with the corporate life — as the close of the world's history. 4. A doctrine of Victory— completes the teaching of the Epistles on the Victory of the Lord— and of his people. 5. A doctrine of Judgment. "The Prince of this world is judged." Judgment of the usurping Power— of the world— of nations— of persons. 6. A doctrine of Restoration. There is to be a perfect humanity. Humanity only perfect in society. The city a type of society in its maturity. Failure of earthly societies to realize the ideal. Realization promised in the Bible. Need of the final vision to complete the teaching of God. The Bible an account of the preparation of the City of God— by expectation, prophecy, and type— by the reconstitution of men's relations to God and to each other— both effected by the Gospel. Other systems have despaired of human society. Completeness of the Bible in providing for the perfection of man in a corporate as well as a personal life. Final survey of the progressive teaching of the New Testament in its several stages, represented by the— Gospels— Acts— Epistles— Apocalypse. Fitness of this survey to increase the sense that the doctrine is not of the world— and the conn dence that it is of God. THB PROGRESS OF DOCTRINE IN THE NEW TESTAMENT LECTURE I. THE NEW TESTAMENT. I HAVB GIVEN UNTO THEM THE WORDS WHICH THOU GAVEST XI.< St. John xvii. 8. On the truth of this saying stands the whole fabric cf creeds and doctrines. It is the ground of authority to the preacher, of assurance to the believer, of existence to the Church. It is the source from which the perpetual stream of Christian teaching flows. All our testimonies, instruc- tions, exhortations, derive their first origin and continuous power from the fact that the Father has given to the Son, the Son has given to his servants, the words of truth and life. I am now called, not so much to preach the words thus given to us, as to inquire concerning them. It is a sec- ondary and subsidiary ministry. Our first charge is, " Go stand and speak in the temple to the people all the words of this life." We go ; and our words not only meet the wants of conscience, but stir the activities of thought ; and a cloud of questions rises rounc ns, which must be dissipated while it is gathering, but *\ Inch will still gather while it is being dissipated. Thus Ihe preaching of the words of life to the people is evermore 2 35 26 THE PROGRESS OF DOCTRINE. LECT. I attended by an incidental necessity for extensive and va* nous discussion. The institution of these lectures is a testimony to that necessity, and a testimony also to the relation which such discussion bears to the main object for which the Word was given. For if this pulpit is devoted on these occasions to the deliberate treatment of some particular question, that is only on account of the bearing which such questions may have on the work which the Church fulfils in testifying the Gospel of the grace of God. More especially is it fitting that one, who is habitually engaged in the work of preaching and teaching, should keep as near as he can to this ultimate practical aim. Therefore, invoking the guid- ance of God, I shall submit to you some considerations on the progress of doctrine in the New Testament, a subject which on the one side touches the living ministry of the Church at its very heart, and on the other is specially affected by the present tendencies of sacred criticism. Into all our parishes and all our missions the thousands of evangelists, pastors, and teachers are sent forth with the Bible placed in their hands, and with solemn charges to draw from its pages the Gospel which they preach. But Tv hen those pages are opened, they present, not the exposi- tion of a revelation completed, but the records of a revela- tion in progress. Its parts and features are seen, not as arranged after their development, but as arranging them- selves in the course of their development, and growing, through stages which can be marked, and by accessions which can be measured, into the perfect form which they attain at last. Thus the Bible includes within itself a world v>l* anticipation and retrospection, of preparation and completion, whereby various and vital relations are consti LECT. I. THE NEW TESTAMENT. 27 tuted between its several parts. These relations enter as really into the scheme of Scripture as do the several parts themselves ; and must be rightly understood and duly ap- preciated, if the doctrine, which the Book yields upon the whole, is to be firmly grasped by the student or fairly \ re- sented by the preacher. In this wa} r the subject of progressive teaching in Scrip- ture is implicated with the living ministry of the Church. How it is affected by the present tendencies of sacred criti- cism there is no need to explain, for it is known to all that the studies of our day are directed to a minute and la- borious examination of the internal characteristics of the books of Scripture, and more particularly of their mutual relations, and of the differences of doctrine both in amount and form which they exhibit on comparison with each other. Notwithstanding all reasons for anxiety, sometimes even for grief and indignation, which we may find in the actual handling of the subject, we have cause to be thank ful that the progressive character of revelation is thus coming more distinctly before the mind of the Church. In regard to any subject the observation of successive stages of design must be expected ultimately to conduce to a more thorough comprehension of the thing designed, and will also naturally tend to place the observer in closer contact with the mind of the designer. So will it be with the writ- ten word. Only a part of the general subject is before us now. We shall be occupied with the last stage through which the revelation of God was perfected, as exhibited in the canoni- cal books of the New Testament. But though only a part of a larger subject, this is itself one of great extent and various aspect, and on this account some preliminary 28 THE PROGRESS OF DOCTRINE. LECT. I words are necessary, in order to fix the point of view from which it will be regarded. I shall therefore devote the chief part of this introductory lecture to secure for myself the following positions. 1 . That by doctrine shall be here meant divine teaching, or truth as communicated by God. 2. That the course of divine teaching under the Chris- tian dispensation shall be considered to coincide in extent with the New Testament Scriptures. 3. That the relative character and actual order of the parts of the New Testament shall be taken, as adequately representing the progressive plan on which this course of divine teaching was perfected. When I have strengthened these positions by such ex- planations as time will allow, I will close this introduction ,. f the subject, by pointing out that the progressive system ■•if teaching in the New Testament is an obvious fact, that it is marked by distinct stages, and that it is determined by natural principles. I. 1. First, then, I assume that the doctrine here spoken of is divine teaching, and that by its progress is meant a systematic advance in its communication from God. That some doctrine contained in the New Testament must be thus characterized, we are assured by the assertion of the Lord Jesus in the text: "I have given unto them the words which thou gavest me." Words then have been given to men, which, not only in their original source, but in their intermediate channel, are absolutely and incontestably di- vine. Over and above these discoveries of the mind of God which are contained in the natural order of things, and which we may discern by an intuitive faculty or infer by a reasoning process, we have that, which, in the clearest, i^ECT. I. THE NEW TESTAMENT. 29 fullest, strongest sense, must be called the "word of God." Nay, he has not only given us a word; he has clone more, he has given us ivords, 1 separate, articulate, definite com- munications, each as truly divine as is the whole word which they compose. Such words of God were spoken of in old time as "coming to" particular persons, who were to he the messengers of those words to others. The Proph- ets testified, when they spoke, that " the word of the Lord came to them ; " and the testimony was authenticated of God and accepted of men. But the communications made through them were only introductory. " In sundry parts and in divers ways God having spoken of old to the Fathers in the Prophets, at the end of these days spake to us in his Son." Those to whom the word of God came were suc- ceeded by him who is himself the " Word of God." He became man, and stood forth as the one real and eternal Prophet, the medium of communication between the mind of God and the mind of man. Then he was in the world, but he "was in heaven," in the concourse of men but " in the bosom of his Father." His flesh was as a veil between the two worlds, and he who dwelt in it read on the one side the secrets of the Most Holy, and on the other presented them to the apprehensions of mankind. On the one side he received, on the other he gave. He showed to the world tho works which he "had seen with his Father ; he spoke to the wccld the words which he had heard with his Father ; and in closing his pergonal teaching in the flesh, he lifted up his eyes to heaven and said, "I have given unto them the words which thou gavest me." Imagination itself can go no farther. If we asked for assurance that men had realty 1 pTipara, 30 THE PROGRESS OF DOCTRINE. LECT. I received the words of God, it would be impossil /e to con- ceive a higher authority, a more plain assertion, or a more unqualified statement. On this point I need say no more. My only purpose in touching it has been to refresh in your minds the remembrance, that the doctrine about which we inquire is, in some part of it at least, truly and incontesta- bly divine. 2. More perhaps needs to be said in order to justify the next step which I would take, in the assumption that the course of divine teaching coincides in extent with the Scrip- tures of the New Testament. Have I the right to extend the course of divine teaching so far ? If so, have I the right to refuse to extend it farther ? At first sight the text might suggest that the character of doctrine, which has been just asserted, should be limited to the words spoken by the lips of the Lord Jesus when on earth. If we pass beyond this, and include words spoken by the lips of men, we may seem com- pelled to extend our thoughts to a progress of doctrine car- ried on to the end of time. In neither of these cases wih the course of the divine communication of Christian truth coincide with the extent of the New Testament. In the one case it will be comprised in the Gospels alone, which leave us some of their most peculiar doctrines only in short summaries or pregnant germs ; in the other case it may be prolonged through an indefinite series of Accessions, which will always leave the Church in doubt, as to what the faith delivered to it is, and still more in doubt as to what it n>ay hereafter turn out to be. What then are the words to which the description in the text applies? or rather, within what limits shall we se^k them ? Undoubtedly the Loid speaks of all the words which he LECT. I. THE NEW TESTAMENT. 31 had already uttered to those disciples as theii teacher in the days of his flesh. But is the saying true only of those words? Is it to be restricted to that stage of teaching which had then reached its conclusion, and of which at the time the assertion might seem to be made? Or is it also true of other words ? words for instance which he gave after he was risen? or, again, words which he gave after he was glorified ? To those who would study the evolution of doctrine in the New Testament this question is of vital importance, for if, after we have passed the first stage of teaching, the au- thority which we recognized there is withdrawn, our treat- ment of the subsequent teaching must be conducted in an altered spirit and on other principles. Having bowed in silence before the Divine Teacher, we shall recover our free- dom of opinion when we are left with his followers. Only at first shall we tread securely on the rock : we must then look well to our steps, and be free to choose our path among the irregularities and uncertainties of a more shifting soil ; for we shall pass from words which the Son of God gave to men, to the expansions of those words and the deductions from them which the men who first received them have given to us. Our study of the progress of doctrine within the limits of the New Testament would thus be entirely changed in its character, as we passed from the Gospels to the subsequent books. Only in the first stage would the progress of doctrine bear the meaning of the progress of its communication by God. In the second stage it could but signify the progress of its apprehension by men. The Acts and Epistles would thus form only the first chapter of the history of the Church, separated from its subsequent chap- ters by a much narrower interval than that which marks 32 THE PROGRESS OF DOCTRINE. LeCT. I them off from the Gospels which precede them. They would in fact be simply specimens of human apprehensions of divine truth ; specimens of singular value, because produced under peculiar advantages, but yet, like any other indi- vidual apprehensions, modified by the personal character and historical position of those who formed them. They would therefore be liable to such deductions on these ac- counts as historical criticism might suggest, and would re- main rather as warrants for various explications by other minds and in other ages, than as fixed canons of the truth forever. I ask, then, whether the giving of the words of God was completed when the text was uttered, or whether there was a distinct part of the process yet to come ? The discourse in which the saying occurs has supplied the answer. Its distinctive character is that of transition, closing the past but opening the future, representing a later stage of teaching as the predestined completion of the earlier, and cementing both into one, by asserting for both the same source, and diffusing over both the same authority. This function in the progress of divine teaching, which be- longs to the discourse in the 14th, 15th, and 16th chapters of St. John, must come more distinctly into view at a later stage of our inquiry. It is now sufficient to refer to it in passing, as an evidence that the very words, of which the text specifically and indubitably speaks, include the asser- tion of the same divine gift and authority for other teach- ing which was j T et to come. Thus we stand on the declaration of the giver of the word himself, when we consider the progress of Christian doc- trine in its communication from God as extending, not only over one stage in which it was delivered b}* the Lord in the LECT. I. THE NEW TESTAMENT. 33 flesh, but through a second stage in which it was delivered by the same Lord through the Spirit. It might indeed have seemed natural, at the point where the voice of Jesus ceases to draw the line which should terminate the words which were given by the Father to the Son, and by the Son were given to men, a line of broad demarcation, separating those words from all others whatever. But that very voice forbade the act, and admonished us that, when it should seem to have ceased, it must yet be recognized as cariying on the course of communications which were not then com plete. I now say no more on this important point, because a clear understanding upon it ought to be one of the chief results of the inquiry which lies before me. But a second question is waiting for me now. If I see that the proposal to restrict the divine authority to the com- munications of the Lord's own lips has been negatived by himself, I am left to extend that authority to communica- tions from the lips of men. Then where am I to stop ? Am I any longer within the limits of the New Testament ? 1 have looked forth on the ocean. Am I, or am I not, actu- ally launched upon it? I am compelled to turn towards the vast and confusing prospect, in order to mark the limits within which I claim the right to remain. Now if the second part of the New Testament simply re- hearsed to us certain definite revelations, which the writers alleged that they had received, no difficulty would exist. Their testimony to these would be on the same footing (or nearly so) with the testimony of the Evangelists as to the discourses of our Lord. But this is not their method. We have the revealed truth presented to us in the Epistles, not only as a communication from God, but also as an appre- hension by man. The great transition from the one stage 2* 34 THE PROGRESS OF DOCTRINE. LECT f, to the other is exhibited before our eyes as already effected. We have the gospel as it existed in the mind of Peter and of Paul, of James and of John. It is thus presented to us In combination with the processes of human thought and the variations of human feelings, in association with pecu» iiaritics of individual character, and in the course of its more perfect elaboration through the exigencies of events and controversies. But is not this account of the second part of the New Testament also the account of the whole subsequent history of doctrine in the world, that is, of Church history, in its essential and inward character ? Certainly it is so ; and therefore the Acts and the Epistles stand to the ecclesiasti- cal historian as the first chapters of his work, for there he alreacty finds the aspects which the revealed truth bears to human minds and assumes in human hands, and the manner in which its parts and proportions come to be distinctly ex- hibited through the agency ol men and the instrumentality of facts. And this is a process which goes on through de- scending ages, and in which every generation bears its part. It has gained accessions from all those varieties of the hu- man mind which have been placed in contact with revealed truth, from the idiosyncracies of persons, of nations, of ages, from Fathers and Councils, from controversies and heresies, from Hellenist, Alexandrian, and Roman forms of thought, from the mind of the East and the mind of the West, from corruptions and reformations of religion, from Italy and England, from Germany and Geneva, from au- thority and inquiry, from Church and Dissent. These words and others like them represent the varying measures of ap- prehension, and the varying kinds of expression, which the Gospel revelation has found among men. The " Develop* LECT. I. THE NEW TESTAMENT. 35 ments of doctrine " (to use a word which some time since was very familiar to many of us) — the developments of doctrine thus originated were the joint product of the re- vealed truth and the condition of the mind which received it. The revealed truth was one, but the conditions of the human mind are infinitely various, and hence an endless variety in the developments themselves, — a variety which sometimes melts into a higher harmony, but more often jan on our ears in irreconcilable discord. I am not here concerned with the degrees in which differ ■ ent developments have represented or perverted truth, and in which they have more conspicuously exhibited the ele- ment of the divine truth or that of the human infirmity. 1 would only observe that through all this confusion there is in some sense a progress of doctrine. Even by misappre- hensions and perversions the relations of the "Word to the human mind are more perfectly disclosed. In partial sys- tems of religion those parts of the entire scheme which they have more particularly adopted often come to be seen under a stronger light. But especially it is evident that certain great features of truth emerge from periods of conflict and the driving mists of controversy, and swell upon the sight with outlines more defined and a power more recognized than had seemed to belong to them before. The names of Athanasius, Augustine, and Luther, recall in a moment some of the most obvious examples of this fact, in regard to the doctrines of the Nature of Christ, of Original Sin, and of Justification by Faith. There were periods then at which these doctrines stood forth with a vividness, precision, and force, which gave them as it were a new place in the apprehensions of men, affecting of course by their increased definiteness and ex« 36 TIIE PROGRESS OF DOCTRINE. LECT. I. pansion the proportions of the whole body of truth. These however are only prominent instances of a general and continuous fact. Every age, every Church, every sect, every controversy, in some "way or other contributes some- thing to the working out, the testing, or the illustrating of some part of the revelation of God. Our English mind hat Iwrne its part, and the religious movements of our own day "will deposit some residuum of materials for future thought and knowledge. Our missionary efforts will, in this respect also, have results of their own, and Christianity in India or in China, when it has in some degree lost its English type, and entered into full relations with the peculiar minds of those peculiar races, will perhaps make as distinct addi- tions to the history of doctrine, as we recognize in passing from the theology of the Eastern to that of the Western Church. The history upon the whole both has been and will be a long disclosure of the perverse tendencies and in- firm capacities of man. Yet a special providence over the Church and the Living Spirit in it has been proved as well as promised : and he who looks back upon the tortuous and agitated course of thought, perceives that the truth is not only preserved, but in some sense advanced, the defini- tions of it becoming more exact, the construction of it more systematic, and the deductions from it more numerous. Thus the history of the apprehension of Christian truth by man, which commences within the New Testament, is continued in the history of the Church to the end of time ; and still, while it is continued, it is in some sort a history of progress, and one in which the Spirit of God mingles, and which the providence of God moulds. What then is it which draws the line of separation between the apostolic period and all the subsequent periods LECT. I. THE NEW TESTAMENT. 37 of this history? It is this — That the apostolic period ig not only a part of the history of the apprehension of truth by man: it is also a part of the history of the communication of truth by God. It is the first stage of the one, and the last stage of the other. The aspect which the Gospel boars in the writings of the Apostles is a communication from God of what it really is, a revelation of what he intende 1 that it should be in the minds of men forever. This char- acter of the apostolic writings has, without variation cf testimony, been acknowledged by the Church from the beginning ; but this acknowledgment has been confined to these writiugs, and has never been extended to subsequent expositions or decrees. Councils and doctors have claimed a right to be heard, only as asserters and witnesses of apos- tolic teaching. No later communications from heaven are supposed or alleged. What has been handed down, — what is collected out of the writings of the Apostles — is the professed authority for all definitions and decrees ; ano all reference to (what may appear to be) other authority \r based upon the fact, asserted or implied, that in the quar ters appealed to there was reason to recognize some special connection with the apostolic teaching. This fact, more- over, comes out most elearl}' at those moments in which (what might be called) an advance of doctrine is seen most evidently to take place. If the doctrine of the Nature of Christ shows a new distinctness and firmness of outline after Nice and Constantinople, }'et that form of the doc- trine professes to be, and when examined proves to be, only a formal definition of the original truth. Nothing new has been imported into it ; only fresh verbal barriers have excluded importations which were really new. If the doctrine of Justification by Faith seems, at the era of the 38 THE PROGRESS OF DOCTRINE. LECT. I. Reformation, like a new apparition on the scene, yet it is advanced, and is received, only as the old Pauline doctrine reasserting its forgotten claims. Even palpable innovations have supported their preten- sion3 by the plea of an imaginary tradition, descending from the days when it was confessed that the communica- tions of God had been completed. Our own days have seen fresh evidence of the tenacity with which the Romish Church holds to this theory, while making that last addition to the articles of the faith which seemed to imply that it was abandoned. Then, when the pretence of a tradition appeared to have finally given way under the ever accumu- lating mass of novelties, minds accustomed to the logic of facts began to cast about for some other theory, which should admit of being reconciled with them. The exposi- tion of such a theory began in this pulpit, and was com- pleted in the communion into which its author speedily passed. It was a theory which virtually claimed for the Church the power to create new doctrine, instead of a mere authority to determine what was old. But the claim could not secure adoption, though it had been boldly acted upon, and seemed necessary to the controversial position of Rome. The settled sense of Christendom as to the revela- tion of the truth was not to be violated. Newly-" defined " doctrines were still to be pronounced true and necessary on the ground that they had been held by the Apostles, though no evidence of that fact survived, and that they had been handed down by tradition, though no trace of the tradi • tion could be found. The gift thus ascribed to the " Infallible Authority " was not an inspiration to know the truth of new doctrines, but a revelation of the fact that they were old. The new position has been in fact abandoned by those who LECT. 1. THE NEW TESTAMENT. 39 offered, but have not been suffered to hold it (2) ; and we are still able to say, that only in transient jnoments of en- thusiasm, and by some insignificant and eccentric sects* has there been any definite allegation, that doctrinal com> munications from God have been received since the last Apostle died. The sum of what has been said is this. (First) , There are words (definite doctrinal communications) of which it is sai \ by the Lord Jesus, "The words which thou gavest me I have given them." (Secondly), These words are not only those which he spake with his lips in the days of his flesh ; they include other words, afterwards given through men in the Spirit, during a period of time which is repre- sented to us by the books of the New Testament. (Thirdly) , Those words were finished in that period, and have received no subsequent additions. The description in the text not only cannot be shown to belong, but has never been sup- posed to belong, to any words which have been spoken since. On these three points the judgment of the Church has been all but universal and unchanging. In speaking there- fore of progress of doctrine in the New Testament, I speak of a course of communication from God which reaches its completion within those limits, constituting a perfected scheme of divine teaching, open to new elucidations and deductions, but not to the addition of new materials. 3. The books of the New Testament are the form into which this divine teaching has been thrown for permanent and universal purposes, and by the will of God they con- stitute the only representation of it for all men and for- ever. I have now to add that they give the representation, 40 THE PROGRESS OF DOCTRINE. LECT. I. not only of its substance, but also of the plan on which it was progressively matured. It must here be remarked that there are two ways in which we may exhibit the progressive development of any system of things, whether it be a scheme of religious doctrine, a science, a political constitution, or anything else which has completed itself by degrees — one of which may be charac- terized as the historical, the other as the constructive method. In the one case we inquire after the exact succession of events through which the result was reached ; in the other we discriminate the stages of advance in the result itself. The representation of progress made in the one case would be regulated simply by the order of fact, while that which would be produced in the other would be rather governed by the order of thought. Now if we consider the New Tes- tament as representing a progressive development of doc- trine, it is so in the latter sense more than in the former. It is rather a constructive than a simply historical represen- tation. For instance, in the development of the manifesta- tation of Christ in the flesh, the words and deeds recorded by St. John must be restored, on the historic principle, to their proper places in the actual order of events ; on the constructive principle, they properly coalesce into a sepa- rate whole, as bringing out a view of that manifestation, which is an advance in the order of thought upon the view which the synoptic Gospels present. So in a historic rep- resentation of the formation of apostolical doctrine we should have to trace the successive steps and occasions of its advance, to secure the exact chronological arrangement of St. Paul's Epistles, and to insert them in their several places in the narrative of his labors. On the other hand, the purposes of a constructive representation may be tetter LECT. f. THE NEW TESTAMENT. 41 served by keeping the records of the external activity of the Church separate from its directly doctrinal writings, or by placing those doctrinal writings in a different order from that of iheir chronological production. Thus the New Tes- tament, as a whole, presents to us a course of teaching on lli« constructive rather than on the historic principle ; and it is in this sense that I propose to take the book as an ade- quate representation, not only of the substance of the divine teaching, but of the plan and order of its progress. It may be said, that there is a difference between the prog- ress of doctrine as it actually was during the time which the New Testament covers, and the representation of it which we have in those particular writings. Yes ! and there would be a difference between the actual course of some important enterprise, — say of a military campaign for instance, — and the abbreviated narrative, the selected documents, and the well-considered arrangement, by which its conductor might make the plan and execution of it clear to others. In such a case the man who read would have a more perfect understanding of the mind of the actor and the author than the man who saw ; he would have the whole course of things mapped out for him on the true principles of order. Such is the position of every reader of the New Testament, who accounts that the Lord, by whom the his- torical development of truth was guided, is also the virtual &uthor of that representation of it which lies before hira. We have not, then, to make out a chart from materials given to us, but to study one which is alread} r made. Trac- ing the course of doctrine as it is seen to advance through those pages, we shall have no need to reconstruct for our« selves the actual oider in which the truth was historically deve'oped. Whatever were the measures and gradation? 42 THE PROGRESS OF DOCTRINE. LeCT- I by which it was opened out to the Church at first, here are the measures and gradations by which it is opened out to the Church forever. Indeed, the plan on which the Lord perfected his promised teaching was one which could only be seen in retrospect. Conducted through the medium of persons and events, and by the use of local occasions, the method of procedure must at the time have very imperfectly disclosed its real system and coherence. Parts of the truth, for instance, were being cleared and settled in some Churches, which perhaps were scarcely inquired for in oth- ers, yet the decision was of the Lord, and destined for the whole body. A transient occasion demanded the interfer- ence of a particular Apostle, and through his sentence was given some fundamental and eternal principle. Among all that was clone and written and said, in that scene of in- tense activity and incessant movement which the apostolic writings open to us, it would have been hard indeed at the time to follow with steady eye the great lines of advancing doctrine, and to single out the acts and documents which Would adequately represent the results secured. Only when these results had been firmly deposited in the Church, could the successive contributions of the divine teaching be recognized, and their relative order discerned. To exhibit this plan of things there was need, not of a mass of acci- dentar records, but of a body of records selected and ar- ranged. It might seem that we had no right to attribute such a character as this to a collection of writings which are upon the face of them independent and occasional. Yet it is certain that, when taken as a whole, this i3 its effect, and that it makes upon the mind the impression of unity and design. He who reads through the Koran (albeit the work of a single ai thor) finds himself oppressed^ LECT. I. THE NEW TESTAMENT. 43 as by a shapeless mass of accidental accretions. He who reads through the New Testament finds himself educated as by an orderly scheme of advancing doctrine. The sev- eral books seem to have grown into their places as compo- nent parts of an organic whole ; and " the New Testament of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ" lies before us as an account of a perfected revelation, and a course of dhine teaching designed and prepared by one presiding mind. II. Having now accomplished the preliminary steps, I will close this introductory Lecture by pointing out the reality of the progress of which I speak, the stages through which it is perfected, and the principles by which it is regu- lated. 1. The reality of this progress is very visible ; and more especially so when we regard the New Testament as the last stage of that progressive teaching which is carried on through the Scriptures as a whole. Glance from the first words to the last, "In the beginning God created the heav- ens and the earth " — " Even so, come, Lord Jesus." How much lies between these two ! The one the first rudiment of revelation addressed to the earliest and simplest con- sciousness of man, that, namely, which comes to him through his senses, the consciousness of the material world which lies in its grandeur round him : the other the last cry from within, the voice of the heart of man, such as the interven- ing teaching has made'it ; the expression of the definite faith which has been found, and of the certain hope which has been left by the whole revelation of God. The course of teaching which carries us from the one to the other is progressive throughout, but with different rates of progress in the two stages which divide it. In the Old Testament the progress is protracted, interrupted, often languid, some* 44 THE PROGRESS OF DOCTRINE. LECT. 1. times so dubious as to seem like retrogression. Accessions take place in sundry parts, in divers manners, at times un- der disguises of earthly forms, seeming to suggest mistakes, which have to be themselves corrected. Yet through it all the doctrine grows, and the revelation draws nearer to the great disclosure. Then there is entire suspension. Wfi turn the vacant page which represents the silence of 400 years, — and we are in the New Testament. Now again there is progress, but rapid and unbroken. Our steps before were centuries ; now they are but years. From the manger of Bethlehem on earth to the city of God coming down from heaven the great scheme of things unrolls before us, without a check, without a break. It is in harmony with processes of nature and with human feelings, that preparations should be slowly matured, but that final results should rapidly unfold. AVhen life becomes intense it can no more endure delays, or develop itself by languid progression. The root was long before it showed the token of its presence, the stem and leaves grew slowly, but yes- terday the bud emerged from its sheath, and to-day it is expanded in the flower. A swift course of events, the period of one human life, a few contemporary writers have given us all the gospel that we need to kuow under our present dispensation, all that we shall ever know till Jesus comes again. But there is, as has been observed, a plan of progress though its course is swift, and I would take note first of its stages and then of its principles. 2. Its stages I do not now examine ; but just mark them off as they catch the eye. First we are conducted through the manifestation of Christ in the flesh : we see and hear and learn to know the li ing person, who is at once the Le CT. I THE NEW TESTAMENT. 45 source and the subject of all the doctrine of whuh we speak. He is presented as the source of doctrine, delivering with his own lips the first Christian instructions, the first preaching of a present gospel and the pregnant principles of truth. He is presented as the subject of doctrine, for it is himself that he offers to us by word and deed as the object of our faith, and the events which we see accom- plished in his earthly history are the predestined substance of all subsequent instruction. But within this stage of learning there is not only continuous development by the course of events and accumulation of facts, but at a certain point a great change occurs, which is visible to every eye. It is the point where we pass from the sjmoptic Gospels and come under the teaching of St. John. Now we rise to heaven, and go back to " the beginning," and set forth from "the bosom of the Father." Now we are taught to recognize the glory of the person of Christ, with a con- sciousness not changed but more distinct, with acknowl- edgments not new but more articulate. In the former Gos- pels we have walked with him in the common paths of life ; in this we seem to have joined him on "the holy mount." It is almost like the change which was witnessed by the three disciples, who had walked conversing by his side, and then suddenly saw his countenance altered and his raiment white and glistering. Such is the effect upon our minds, not merely of the last Evangelist's own expressions, but of that selection of words and acts which it was his commia* sion to make and to leave. We close the Gospels and open the books which follow We have passed a great landmark and are farther on our way; yet the line of doctrine whnh we pursue seems to have sunk to a lower level, for we cease to be taught by 46 THE PROGRESS OF DOCTRINE. LECT. L the lips of the Incarnate Word, and are remitted to the discourses and writings of men. Is this progress? He assured us that it would be ; and we find that it is. We are under the dispensation of the Spirit ; and in the book of Acts are borne, by seeming accident but by invis- ible guidance, straight along that line of fact and of thought in which we are to find the full developments of the truth which was given in the Gospels. In matter of doctrine the book of Acts is our introduc- tion to the Epistles. Here if the authority of the teacher seems lowered from what it was in the Gospels, the fulness of the doctrine is visibly increased. Its more mysterious parts are seen expanded and defined. Statements which might seem of doubtful meaning in the former stage have found a fixed interpretation in the latter. Suggestions of thought in the one have become habits of thought in the other. What were only facts there have become doctrines here ; and truths, which just gleamed from a parable, or startled us in some sudden saying, are now deliberately expanded into manifold and recognized relations with the feelings and necessities of man. The nature and conse- quences of the work of Christ on earth, the offices for men Which he now fulfils in heaven, the living relations which ne bears to his people in the Spirit, the discoveries of his majesty and communication of his glory which are ready to be revealed in the last time, all these are seen in the apos- tolic writings, sometimes asserted as perspicuous doctrine, more oilen blending and kindling together in the inward | life of the Spirit, giving the form to the character and the motives to the life. Yet a further change takes place as we reach the close 01" the Scriptures. This inwa;d and personal life in the Spirit LeCT. I. THE NEW TESTAMENT. 47 is not all. There is a kingdom of Christ, which has its form, its history, its destinies. In the later Epistles wo see a constituted societ}^, and hear the sounds of a coming conflict : the Church appears on the defensive, and the steps of invisible powers are moving round her. The pro- phetic book which follows transports us into the unseen world, and opens the temple of God in hea\en, and shows u-{j the connection of the history of the Church with things above and things below ; and guides through the dim con- fusion of the conflict to the last victory of the Lamb, leaving us at last among the full effects of redemption, in a new heaven and a new earth, and in a holy society and City of God. 3. Having cast our eye along the stages of advance, we next inquire after the principles by which it is governed ; and we find them in the relations which the doctrine bears to its author, which it bears to the facts on which it is founded, which it bears to the human mind to which it is addressed, and which its component parts bear to each other. a. The relation of the doctrine to its author is the ground of its continuous unity, and unless there be unity we have no right to speak of progress : for succession is of many, but progress is of one. The unity of the New Testament doctrine lies in this, that it is the teaching of one mind, the mind of Christ. The security for this is given tc us in two ways: first by the fact that there is no part rf the later and larger doctrine which has not its germs and principles in the words which he spoke with his own lips in the days of his flesh. It is pro /ided that all which is to be spoken after shall find support and proof from his own pregnant and forecasting sayings. Secondly, it is made clear by .his own 48 THE PROGRESS OF DOCTRINE. LECT L promises beforehand, by facts which evidence his personal administration, and by the distinct assertions of the men tfhorn he employs, that, when his own voice has ceased on earth, it is nevertheless he who teaches still. The testimo- nies of this are scattered along our whole path, till we come to the last vision itself, in which he personally reap- pears, " to show unto his servants the Revelation which God gave unto him, ' renewing thereby for the last time the assertion of our text, " I have given unto them the words which thou gavest me." b. The relation of the doctrine to the facts on which it is founded is a principle by which a certain measure of prog- ress is necessarily constituted. Christian doctrine does not ground itself on speculation. It begins from the region and the testimony of the senses. Its materials are facts, and it is itself the interpretation and application of them. It is therefore reasonable that the facts should be completed, before they are clearly interpreted and fully applied. Jesus must have died and risen again before the doctrine concerning his death and resurrection can be brought to light. Not till the Son of Man is glorified can we expect to arrive at a stage of doctrine which shall give all the meaning and the virtue of facts which till then were cot completed. Up to that time we are in the midst of a hisiory of which his own saying is true, " What I do thou knowest not now, but thou shalt know hereafter." c. The relation of the doctrine to the human mind does *Iso plainly necessitate a particulai kind of progress in the as.ethod of its communication. The doctrine was net meant to be an opinion but a power : " The v r ords that I speak unto you, they are spirit and they are life." It therefore had to pass from the form of a divine announce- LECT. I. THE NEW TESTAMENT. 49 ment into the form of a human experience. It had to es- tablish its own connection with the world of human thoughts and feelings. Once spoken by the mouth of the Lord, it might perhaps have been left to make this transition according to the natural laws of the human mind. But the transition in itself was too great, the consequences of error in the first stage of it would be too momentous, for the Author and Finisher of our faith to leave the Church to her ordinary resources at so critical a moment. He would give a divine certainty and authority to the first human appre- hensions of his truth. He would make it sure that he had himself conducted those first experiences and applications of the word, by which future experiences and applications might be guided and tried forever. Therefore the word spoken to men by the voice of Jesus changed into a word spoken in men by his Spirit, creating thus a kind of teach- ing which carried his word into more intimate connection with human thought and more varied application to human life. cZ. Lastly, the relation of the several parts of doctrine to each other would call for a certain orderly course of devel- opment. There is a natural fitness that the knowledge of the Lord himself should precede the knowledge of his work, and that we should wait on his ministry on earth before we apprehend his ministry in heaven, and that we should see that we are reconciled by his death before we understand how we are saved by his life ; embracing the meritorious means before we expatiate among the glorious issues. It is reasonable that an acquaintance with Christ himself, and a knowledge of his work and grace, should be given first, and that, from the source thus piovided, the rules and mo- tives of conduct should afterwards be elicited. It is right 3 50 THE PROGRESS OF DOCTRINE. LECT. 1. that we should be fully and clearly instructed in the things of our present dispensation, and in the life of faith through which we are passing now. and in the kingdom of an inward and spiritual grace, and then that we should be subse {[iiently informed, and more dimly and briefly too, of the great history of the unseen; conflict with which we are more remotely concerned, and of its final issues when the former things will have passed away and God shall make all things new. These various parts of the doctrine, though in seme degree commingling and interfused, do } T et on the whole sort themselves out in Gospels, Epistles, and Apocalypse Lift up now 3*our eyes on this monument of a distant age which you call the New Testament. Behold these remains of the original literature of a busy Jewish sect ; these occa sional writings of its leaders, emanating from different hands and gathered from different localities. They are delivered to you collected and arranged, though by means which }'ou cannot ascertain. They are before you now, not as acci dentally collected writings, but as one book ; a design com pleted, a body organized, and pervaded by one inward life The several parts grow out of and into each other witb mutual support, correlative functions, and an orderly devel opment. It is a M whole body fitly joined together and com pacted by that which every joint supplies, according to the effectual working in the measure of every part, making in- crease of the bocty to the building itself up" in truth. It begins with the person of Christ, and the facts of his manifestation iji the flesh, and the words which he gave from his Father; and accustoms us by degrees to beheld his glory, and to discern the drift of his teaching and to expect the consequences of his work. It passes on to his body the Church, and open-? the dispensation of his Spirit, LECT. I. THE NEW TESTAMENT. 51 and carries us into the life of his people, yea down into the secret places of their hearts ; and there translates the an- nouncements of God into the experiences of man, and discov- ers a conversation in heaven and a life which is hid with Christ in God. It works out practical applications, and is careful in the details of duty, and provides for difficulties and perplexities, and suggests the order of Churches, and throws up barriers against the wiles of the devil. It shows us things to come, the course of the spiritual conflict, and the close of this transient scene, and the coming of the Lord, and the resurrection of the dead, and the eternal judgment, and the new creation, and the life everlasting. Thus it is furnisbed for all emergencies and prepared for perpetual use. It dominates tbe restless course of thought, and is ever being interpreted by experience and events. It is an authority which survives when others perish, and a light which waxes when others wane. By it, as the instru- ment of God for the education of men, nations are human- ized and churches sanctified. And yul more real and last- ing than these are the ultimate results which it secures. An elect nation is being gathered from among us, and an eternal Church prepared, which shall supplant all transient and provisional societies in that day for which the whole creation waits. Here is the final scope of the Book of our covenant, in its combination with that older volume which it continues and completes. Then is it not to each of us a matter of the deepest per- sonal concern, that the truth which it teaches and the spirit which it breathes should have entered into his own soul ; and that he should thus become a partaker in the life which it reveals, an example of the character which it demands, and an inheritor of the portion which it promises? But 52 THE PROGRESS OF DOCTRINE. LECT. I. this cannot be, unless he yield to the Written Word the confidence which it claims. Oh ! deal worthily, deal tmst- fulty with such a guide as this ! Venture your souls on the words of which the Lord has said, U I have given unto them the words which thou gavest me." Receive the message, receive the form in which it is left to you, " not as the word of man, but as it is in truth, the word of God," and then you will find that it "effectually worketh also in them that believe" ; for he who " obeys from the heart that form of doctrine into which he is delivered," finds that a course of progressive teaching is opened in his own soul, to which the Eloly Scripture will never cease to minister, and which che Holy Spirit will never cease to guide. LECTURE II. THE GOSPELS. VBB BEGINNING OF THE GOSPEL OF JESUS CHRIST, THE SON OF IK)D.' St. Mark i. 1. With reverential and affectionate interest we look back to the beginnings of those things which possess our alle- giance as established powers, or are daily enjoyed as familiar blessings. The thought that they had a beginning, that there was once a time when they were not, gives a fresh- ness to the feelings with which we regard them ; while the comparison of the state of commencement with the state of perfection brings with it a natural pleasure, in marking the tendencies and the tokens of all that has happened since. No words can open the heart to these impressions so powerfully as those which have just been uttered. The beginning of the Gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God, places us at the opening of the mystery of godliness, of the salvation of the world, of the glory which fills the heavens, and of the kingdom which endures forever. The expression with which St. Mark opens his narrative implies that the Gospel is then an established fact and a completed scheme, and that he here returns to the moment when the fact began to assert itself before the world as already present, and the scheme to show itself as in actual progress. The beginning of the Gospel (according to this Evangelist) is not found at the birth of Jesus, when the communications of Heaven were made but to few, and died 54 THE PROGRESS OF DOCTRINE. LeCT. IL suddenly into silence ; but from the time when John did baptize in the wilderness, and when Jesus began to show himself, and "the word of the beginning of Christ" was publicly proclaimed, never to be again suspended till it should have become the word of a completed Gospel. It is indeed the habit of the Apostles to represent the publica- tion of the Gospel as historically commencing at the same point of time. " The word," says St. Peter, "which God sent unto the children of Israel, preaching peace by Jesus Christ, — that word began from Galilee, after the baptism which John preached ; x ar d St. Paul, in presenting to the Jews "the word of this salvation," dates its proclamation from the time " when John had first preached before his coming the baptism of repentance to all the people of Israel." 2 But the expression which is used in the text of the open- ing of the public life of Jesus may also be truly applied to the whole period of that life. The Gospel, considered as fact, began from the Incarnation, and was completed at the Resurrection ; but the Gospel, considered as doctrine, began from the first preaching of Jesus, and was completed in the dispensation of the Spirit. When the Lord quitted the world, he left the material of the Gospel already per- fect, but the exposition of the Gospel only begun ; and in the subsequent consciousness of his disciples, the period of the commencement of the word and the period of its per- fection must have been strongly discriminated from each other. When living in the perfect dispensation of the Spirit, and going to others in the fulness of the blessing of the * Acts x. 86, 87. 2 Ibid. xii 24. Lect - il the gospels. 55 Gospel of Christ, they would remember how that Gospel dawned gradually on their minds during the few years in which its facts had been passing before their eyes, how im- perfectly the} T had understood those facts, how inadequately the} r had apprehended the teaching by which the facts were accompanied, how true it was that what their Lord did they knew not then, but that they were to know it after- wards. To them that whole period of time must hare seemed but an initiatory stage, a " beginning of the Gospel of Jesus Christ the Son of God.'' And so it was. The Gospel which Jesus preached was a Gospel which in its main particulars had yet to be ful- filled, and which could not be fully opened till it had been fulfilled. While the facts were still incomplete, the doc- trine was yet in its commencement ; and we have on this account the right to describe by the words of the text, not only the first steps but the whole of the manifestation of Christ in the flesh. The beginning of the Gospel is a name which in one sense comprehends " all that Jesus began both to do and teach until the day when he was taken up/' To us this stage of the divine teaching is represented u ~ the writings of the four Evangelists ; and I would now con- sider this collection, first relatively, as the beginning of the orderly development of the Christian doctrine in the whole New Testament, and then separately, as a course of teach- ing which bears within its own limits a certain character of systematic advance. Two such topics, included in a single Lecture, can receive little more than a suggestive treatment ; but I pray that this may not occasion any defect of that careful rever- ence with which thi fourfold Gospel must be ever touched 56 THE PROGRESS OF DOCTRINE. LECT. II by thos3 who see in it the very ark of the covenant, where Mie cherubim of ^lory overshadow the mercy-seat. I. First, then-, we have to observe how the Gospel collec- tion is fitted to its place and fulfils Us function, as the com* mencement of the Christian doctrine in the Neiv Testament. Now the Christian doctrine is a doctrine concerning facts which have occurred and a pet son who has been manifested within the sphere of human observation. The foundations of all that is to be known of the word of life are laid in " that which was seen with the eyes, and heard with the ears, and handled with the hands" of men. Then it is necessar3 T for every learner that, before all inferences or ap- plications, the facts themselves as mere phenomena should first be rendered in the clearest light. Hence our elemen- tary lessons are narratives of the simplest form. A plain report of words and deeds, easy and inartificial in the ex- treme, in which the most stupendous events elicit no articu- late expression of feeling, without appearance of plan or sj^stem, with scarcely a comment or reflection, and in which a word of explanation almost startles us — such is the char- acter of the three first of those writings which form the ground and contain the material of all subsequent Christian doctrine. No literary fact is more remarkable than that men, knowing what these writers knew, and feeling what they felt, should have given us chronicles so plain and calm. They have nothing to say as from themselves. Their narratives place us without preface, and keep us without comment, among external scenes, in full view of facts, and in contact with the living person whom they teach us to know. The style of simple recital, unclouded and scarcely colored by any perceptible contribution from the mind of the writers, gives us the scenes, the facts, and the person, f'ECT. II. THE GOSPELS. 57 as seen in the clearest light and through the most transpa- rent atmosphere. Who can fail to recognize a divine pro- vision for placing the disciples of all future ages as nearly as possible in the position of those who had been personally present at kt the beginning of the Gospel of Jesus Christ the Son of God?" The importance, in the whole course of instruction, of first fixing on the mind both the objective reality of the facts and the living portrait of the person, is further intimated by the fourfold repetition of the history. Four times docs the Lord walk before us in the glory of grace and truth, and, whatever correspondences or variations the Gospels may exhibit in other parts of their narratives, four times are the great facts of the death and resurrection of Christ rehearsed to us in the minuteness of circumstantial detail. We do not go forward to further disclosures, till the historical facts have been insured to us hy testimony upon testimon} T , and the portrait has grown familiar to us by line upon line. Far on in the holy books, when the scriptural structure is nearly- perfected, our eyes are turned back to the ground of visible, audible, tangible realities from which we started. " That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our e} T es, which we have looked upon, and our hands have handled of the Word of life (for the life wac r-anifestcd, and we have seen it, and bear witness, and sro'tf unto you that eternal life, which was with the lather and was manifested to us), that which we have seen and heard declare we unto you, that je also may have fellowship with us." 1 Yes, it is trie. We have fellowship with those that 1 1 John i. 1-3. 58 THE PROGRESS OF DOCTRINE. LECT. II. speak, not only in their spiritual relations with their Lord (which they fully understood only after he was gone;, but in their remembrances of him in that earlier time when ho was yet with them. Their witness is effectual for this end. For us also it is all real. He dwelt among us. We beheld his glory. "VVe caught the gracious words that proceeded out of his mouth. So things went with him. So he looked and moved and spoke. So he wrought and suffered and died. We have stood by the cross of Jesus. We have entered the empty sepulchre. We have seen him alive after his passion. He has shown us his hands and his feet. We have been led out as far as to Bethanj^, have seen the hands lifted up to bless, and watched the ascending form. Open these pages where we will, the sense of reality re- vives within us. We feel afresh that we have not followed cunningly devised fables, have not loved an idea, or trusted in an abstraction. We know in whom we have believed, and feel that our Redeemer is our friend. We are sol- emnized as in a holy sanctuary, and secure as in a familiar home. We have escaped from doubt and debate, and no longer criticise or reason. We have recovered the mind of little children. We sit at the feet of Jesus : and tho faith which came into his presence languid and disconcerted, departs invigorated and refreshed. Brethren, let me urge upon you the habitual study of the holy Gospels for this revival of the realit} 7 - and simplicity of faith. Let me urge it more especially upon those who converse in the region of abstract ideas, whether they fre- quent the ordered paths of systematic divinity, or wander in. the free excursions of speculative thought. Dear as the Gospel stories arc to the simple peasant, they are j T et more necessary to the student and the divine ; for there are influ- LECT II. THE GOSPELS. 59 ences in abstract thought and in dogmatic discussion which will drain the soul of life unless fitting antidotes be used : and there is no antidote so effectual, as is found in a con. tinual return to those scenes of historic fact in which tha word of God has given us our first lessons in Christ. This necessity for habitual converse with the evangelical narratives is a sufficient proof of the wisdom which assigned them the place and the space which they actually fill, and especially which ordained that the picture of our Lord's earthly life should be given to us not in one Gospel, but in four. I suppose we all feel how different would have been the effect of possessing one " Life of Christ," however full and systematic. We spend more time, and (if I may use the expression) feel more at home, in the four successive cham- bers than we should have done in one long gallery ; and the impression of all that is there shown to us sinks deeper into the heart, from the repetition of many passages of the story under slightly varying lights and in different relative con- nections. Lively attention, minute observation, careful comparison, and inquiry which is never fully satisfied, are awakened at every step by that singular combination of resemblances and differences ; and the mind is thus engaged to dwell longer on the scenes, conversing among them in a more animated spirit, and with an interest which is per- petually refreshed. We know the immense expenditure of labor in our own day on the comparative characteristics of the Gospels j and the manifold attempts to harmonize or U reconstruct them, to ascertain the point of view of th< writers, and to account for the variations in their selection and position of incidents and in the turn which they give to discourses. Whatever be the spirit in which such attempts 60 THE PROGRESS OF DOCTRINE. LECT. II. are made, they at least afford an incidental witness to the care which divine wisdom has taken to detain and occupy our minds at the outset in those scenes in which alone we can learn to know Jesus Christ himself. It is plain that the four histories are modified by theii own instinctive principles of selection and arrangement, which do not indeed announce themselves, and almost elude our attempts to ascertain them, but yet result in giving four discriminated aspects of their common subject, as the Royal Lawgiver, the Mighty Worker, the Friend of Man, and the Son of God — four aspects, but one portrait ; for if the attitude and the accessories vary, the features and the expression are the same. (3) Who does not perceive the immense assistance hereby given to us for receiving the knowledge of Christ ? One representation, however full, would still have suggested the thought, " This is the impression made upon a single mind. Who can say what part of it is due to the idiosyncrasies of the witness? If we had the impressions of another mind, perhaps we should have a different image." As it is, we derive the impression from four different quar- ters, and the image is still the same. It is represented from four different points of view ; but, however repre- sented, it is the same Jesus. The conception is one, and its unity attests its truth. We feel that we see him as he was. No human being that ever trod the earth has left behind a representation of himself more clear and living, and more certain in its truthfulness, than is that which we possess of the Prophet of Nazareth in Galilee. From time to time some fresh portrait may appear. Some adventurous imagination, charmed and yet perplexed by the Gospel story, may attempt to reconstruct it in ac- LECT. II. THE GOSPELS. 61 cordance with the spirit of the world. Unable to receive as real the sole example of sinless humanit}', 4 t ni^y intro- duce into the picture touches of the error and infirmity which are not there ; and .may mistake the awful gleams of the indwelling Godhead fo^ the glimmer of an enthusiasm which deludes and is deludud. The world may read the boll romance, and half comiirend the creation of fancy. Bat the creations of fancy pensh as they rise, and the Jesus of the Gospels remains ; not only as a perfect ideal, but as a vivid reality, a representation which appears, after every fresh attempt to change it, more glorious in majesty and beauty, and more conspicuous also for truthfulness and life. In placing the statement of the person of Christ as the first work of the Gospel histories, and as the beginning of the Gospel itself, I speak in accordance with the spirit of those books and of the whole ensuing system of doctrine. Jesus Christ created the Gospel by his work ; he preaches the Gospel by his words ; but he is the Gospel in himself. The expression is but the condensation of a hundred passages of Scripture which declare him to be that, which, in more timid but less adequate language, we might say that he wrouglit^ or that he taught, or that he gave. " I am the resurrection and the life." 1 He ' ; is our peace," 2 he " is our life," 3 he is "the hope of glory." 4 " He of God is made unto us wisdom, and righteousness, and sanctifica- tion, and redemption." 5 and they who are saved "are made partakers of Christ," 6 not merely of his gifts, whether they be gifts of grace or glory. Is it not indeed * John xi. 25. 2 Eph. li. 4. 3 Col. iii. 4. • Col. i. 27. « 1 Cor. i. 30. 6 Heb. iii. 14, 6 62 THE PROGRESS OF DOCTRINE. LECT. II. the distinguishing feature of the Christian system, that it places the foundation of salvation in living relations with a living person, rather than in the adoption of opinions or of habits? that under it the believer is, not the man who mail] tains the doctrine of the Trinit} T , or holds "justifica* lion by faith," but the man who has " come to " Christ and " abides in" him? These are the Lord's own words : they are fundamental words in relation to all that is added afterwards : they are, in matter of doctrine, the beginning of the Gospel. The writings of the Evangelists do not present to us a scheme of doctrine as to the nature of Christ or as to the work which he does. They present to us the Lord Jesus himself, as he showed himself to men in order to win their confi- dence and fix their trust. Men learned to know him and to trust him before they fully understood who he was and what he did. The faith which, in the Gospel stories, we see asked for and given, secured and educated, is a faith that fastens itself on a living Saviour, though it can yet but little com- prehend the method or even the nature of the salvation. Thus the New Testament, in giving us these narratives for our first lessons in Christian faith, teaches us that the essential and original nature of that faith lies, not in ac- ceptance of truths which are revealed, but in confidence in a person who is manifested. " He that cometh to me," " He that believeth on me," is the Lord's own account of the child of the new covenant who is the fit recipient of ad- vancing doctrine. Faith, as seen in the Gospels, results not in the first place from the miracles which justify and Bustain it, but from the personal impression which appeals to the conscience and the spirit in man. The first disciplea LECT. II. THE GOSPELS. 63 believed before a miracle had been shown. It was imputed as a fault, " Except ye see signs and wonders 3^e will not believe :" x and it was a condescension to inferior spiritual sensibilities when the simple words "Believe me" 2 were changed to " Or else believe me for the very works' sake." As it was with those disciples, so also is it with oui selves. X\i' ivOpunuv. * ii' &v8pii*9V. * iti. LECT. IV. THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES. Ill Let me ask your attention to the language which thia Apostle uses, when speaking of the sources whenco th« matter of his preaching was derived. Take first two passages from the First Epistle to the Corinthians. He says (ch. xi. 23-25), "I have received of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you, that the Lord Jesus in the night in which he was betrayed took bread ; and having given thanks, he brake it, and said, Take, eat : this is my body, which is broken for you : this do in remembrance of me. Likewise also he took the cup, when he had supped, saving, This cup is the New Testament in my blood : this do ye, as oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of me." Again (ch. xv. 1-7), the same expression, though less full, is used in reference to another class of facts : " Brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received. . . . For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures ; and that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the Scriptures ; and that he was seen of Cephas, and then of the twelve ; after that, he was seen of above five hundred brethren at once ; . • • after that, he was seen of James ; then of all the Apostles." Now place by the side of these statements two others, taken from the Epistles which follow. To the Galatians he says (ch. i. 2, 12), "I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man ; for / neither received it of man, 1 neither teas I taught it, but by revelation 9 ' of Jesus Christ;" ard to the Ephesians (iii. 2, 3) he speaks in the same strain, though with less emphatic precision : u Ye have v vapi ivOpuvov iraptkapov. * 6C ivtxaXi^tvs, 112 THE PROGRESS OF DOCTRINE. LECT. IV. heard of the dispensation of the grace of God, given to me to you- ward : how that by revelation he made known unto me the mystery." 1 Between the first and the second of these pairs of texts a very remarkable difference appears. In the first, St. Paul seems to represent his own preaching as a link in the chain of tradition, " I received," " I delivered," 2 : nor yet as the first link, for even the fuller expression, rendered "I re- ceived of the Lord," 3 does not so fitly import an immediate communication, as a reception of that which had originated from the Lord, and was handed down by his command- ment. (8) St. Paul, therefore, here appears to stand, in respect to the sources of his information, on the same foot- ing as the Evangelist who was associated with him, and to speak of the facts of the manifestation of Christ, " even as they delivered them unto us, 4 who from the beginning were eye-witnesses and ministers of the word." On the other hand, in the second pair of statements, the contrary asser- tion is made, namely, that his gospel was not received from man, nor taught by man, but communicated imme- diately by revelation of the Lord Jesus. The state of the case thus brought to light is in exact accordance with the view which is here taken of the manner in which the Lord perfected his word. The Gospel which the Apostles preached was a combination of historic facts with their spiritual interpretations ; and the expression, " Gospel which I preached," is used by St. Paul in defer- ent places with more immediate reference to the one or the other of these elements. In the passages from the Epistle 1 Kara o'kok&Xv^iv iyvupioi pot ri ftvrr'/piov. 2 naplXa^ov,irapiiwca. * iwb row gvplov. 4 gaOmt rraplioaav {p?r. LECT. IV. THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES. 113 to the Corinthians he speaks of the first and fundamental part of his preaching, referring expressly to the publication of historic facts : — Christ died — he was buried — he rose again — he was seen of Cephas, &c. On the same night that he was betrayed he took bread — he gave thanks, and brake it — .he said, Take, eat, &c. ; and we learn that the Gospel, as a body of historic fact, was received by the Apostle Paul, as by all others who had not seen the Lord in the flesh, from those who were the appointed witnesses of his visible manifestation. In the two latter passages it is otherwise. Not the historic facts, but " the nrystery " connected with them, is spoken of (in the address to the Ephesians) as the subject of the revelation received. And the Gospel of which he writes to the Galatians is plainly not thought of on its historical, but on its doctrinal side. The " other Gospel" into which the converts were " being removed" was not another account of the life of Jesus, but another set of inferences connected with it. When he went up to Jerusalem by revelation, and privately commu- nicated to those of reputation "the Gospel which he preached among the Gentiles," we are sure that he laid before them, not the substance of the history which we read in St. Luke's narrative, but the substance of the doc- trine which is embodied in his own Epistles. The whole argument to the Galatians turns upon the doctrinal element of the Gospel. It is of this, therefore, that he so solemnly affirms that he was not taught it by agency of man, but re- ceived it a3 direct revelation from the Lord ; and this affirmation is made, not merely in respect of the general doctrine, but specifically of those parts of it which it was given to him to develop and defend: "the Gospel which was preached by me," — " my Gospel" as he elsewhere 114 THE PROGRESS OF DOCTRINE. LECT. IV. calls it, the Gospel under that particular aspect which he admits to be the subject of extensive doubt and complaint. The part in the progress of doctrine committed to St. Paul was to define, to settle, and to carry out to its practical consequences the principle of free justification in Christ, which (as a principle) was acknowledged and held before his voice was heard ; and we learn from his own state- ments, that, for this special work, not only a special com- mission, but a special revelation was given him by the Lord Jesus, so as to clear and settle his own mind on those points on which he was sent to clear and settle the minds of others. In this way he was a minister and a wit- ness, not of those things which he had heard from others, nor of those things which he had only thought out for him- self, but of those things which his Lord had showed him in personal visits and distinct communications, according to the announcement made at the first commencement of this peculiar intercourse, " I have appeared unto thee for this purpose, to make thee a minister and a witness, both of those things which thou hast seen, and of those things in the which / will appear unto thee." * No ! he was not only an inspired teacher adorned with the title of Apostle ; he was an Apostle in the strictest sense of the word, a com- missioned witness to others of direct communications of Jesus Christ to himself; one appointed to confirm to others the salvation which, in his own hearing, had begun to be spoken b} T the Lord. The appearances and revelations vouchsafed to the Apostle of the Gentiles are thus conspicuously seen to con- nect themselves with the agency assigned to him in the 1 Acts XXVi. 16. !iv rt tlhii wv rs dtpOrioofiai rw, LECT. IV. , THE ACTS OF THE ArOSTLES. 115 progress of doctrine ; and the more carefully we examine his history and weigh his language, the more sensibly do we feel ourselves in the presence of that great fact, on the reality of which the faith of succeeding ages has reposed, namely, the continued personal administration of the Lord Jesus in founding his Church and perfecting his word. This administration was manifested, as we have seen, b^ selection of agents, direction of events, angelic messages, visits in visions, special instructions, and distinct revela tions ; yet these numerous interventions do not constitute the entire system of divine guidance, or even the chief part of it, but are rather to be regarded as additions to the nor- mal method of administration which they serve both to assist and authenticate. 2. The normal guidance of the Apostles by their Lord was not occasional, but habitual, not through separate in- terventions, but through the Holy Ghost dwelling in them. So the promise ran that it should be ; and so in fact it was. The Day of Pentecost is the opening of the second period of the New Testament dispensation. It stands alone, as does the da} 7 which now we call Christmas : the one the birthday of the Lord, the other the birthday of his Church ; the one proclaimed by praises sung by hosts in heaven, the other by praises uttered in the various tongues of earth. That change is significant: for now the Spirit conveys the true knowledge of the wonderful works of God into the recesses of the human heart. A dispensation is begun, in which the mind of God has entered into myste- rious combination with the mind of man, and henceforth the revealing light shines, not from without, but from within. 116 THE PROGRESS OF DOCTRINE. LECT. IV. " O God, who at this time didst teach the hearts of thy faithful people by the sending to them the light of thy Holy Spirit ! " So speaks the Collect for Whitsunday ; and, in so speaking, seizes at once the central idea of the event. That idea is often imperfectly apprehended : for in the dispensation of the Spirit there is so much that is visible on its surface, that our thoughts are apt to be arrested before they penetrate to its centre. Tongues and prophecies, and signs and wonders, gifts of the Holy Ghost dispensed according to his will, are visible results of the event, and they witness to the Gospel and clear its way. Below these superadded faculties, we are conscious of a mighty influence in the region of the emotions. "We feel the presence of that comfort and strength, of that glow and fervor and joy, by which we see the men animated in the exercise of their new powers, and hear them speak with tongues and magnify God. But we must go further. The new powers seem as it were born from the new impulses ; but whence do the new impulses proceed? Is there not a cause for these? Does the Holy Spirit limit his entrance into man to the region of emotion, which is but the surface of our nature, without reaching those inner springs from which, according to the laws of that nature, the emotions should themselves be quickened! No! be sure that the Holy Ghost has occupied the heart and centre of our being, and that, as the tongues are given as a vent for the fervor of emotion, so the fervor of emotion has its own origin in a sudden access of intellectual light. New apprehensions of truth, new views of things, which those thus visited had seen but had not understood, now burst in a moment on their minds, and from that moment continued to grow more distinct and more extended before their now enlightened LECT IV. THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES. 117 eye. God at that time not only stirred, but taught, the Hearts of his faithful people, and sent to them not only the warmth but " the light" of his Holy Spirit. If this had not been so, what fulfilment would there have been of those promises of the Lord which we lately recalled to mind, respecting the nature and effect of the gift which was to follow his departure : He told his Apostles that thej r should " receive power," and he told them that they should receive " comfort," but we have seen that that on which he chiefly dwelt was the light of knowledge which should rise upon their minds. " In that day ye shall know ; " " he shall bring all things to your remembrance ; " " he shall teach you all things ; " "he shall guide you into all truth ; " "he shall receive of mine and shall show it unto you." These are plain assertions. It is enough that they were made by him who gave the gift, and certainly knew how to describe it. The rehearsal of these assertions be- longed to the last stage of our inquiry ; the evidence of their fulfilment is the thing before us now. Those to whom these promises are given exhibit at the time a dimness of apprehension, a perplexity and disorder of thought, an incapacity to understand the things which they hear and see, which we, enlightened from the light which they afterwards obtained, most unreasonably count to be wonderful. It could not have been otherwise with the strongest and most penetrating intellects. But the fact of their condition of mind is undoubted, whether we ascribe it to personal deficiency or to the necessity of the case. They were dealt with accordingly. From the moment when they saw their Lord ascend, they were in full posses- sion of all the external facts of which they were appointed to bear witness. But they were not in possession of the 118 THE PROGRESS OF DOCTRINE. LECT. IV, spiritual meaning, relations, and consequences of those facts, and therefore the hour of their testimony was not eome, and the interval was passed not in preaching but in prayer. As soon as the promise is fulfilled they lift up iheir voice and speak. Never were men so -changed. Who does not note the accession of boldness, faithfulness, and fervor ! But these are not separated and unsupported gifts. They manifestly have their origin in the certainty of assur- ance and intensity of conviction. The " boldness " * pro ceeds from " a full assurance ;" 2 according as it is written 44 1 believed and therefore have I spoken, these also believe and therefore speak." Their clear, firm testimony rises in a moment before the world, never hesitating or wavering, never to sink or change again, only manifesting more fully, as time advances, the largeness of its compass and the defi- niteness of its announcements. Ever after they speak as men would do who were conscious of a ground of certainty which could not be questioned, who could say that things 44 seemed good to the Holy Ghost and to them ; " 3 that their word was " not the word of man but the word of God ;" 4 that it was 44 the Spirit that bore witness;" 5 that they 44 preached the Gospel with the Holy Ghost sent down from heaven;" 6 that " things which eye had not seen nor ear heard, and which had not entered into the heart of man, had been revealed to them by the Spirit, which searchcth the deep things of God;" that they 4 'had received, not the spirit which is of the world, but the Spirit which is of God, that they might know ,he things which are freely given of 1 napprjola. * izArjpotpopla. 8 Acts xv. 28. 4 1 Tliess. ii. 13. • 1 John v. 6. • 1 Pet. i 12. LECT. IV. THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES. 119 God ;" that they "spoke these things, not in words which man's wisdom taught, but which the Holy Ghost taught ; " and that they " could be judged of no man," because " nono knew the mind of the Lord so as to instruct him, and they had the mind of Christ." 1 It is enough. The three testi- monies concur — the testimony of him who gave the Spirit, the testimony of those who received it, and the testimony of the facts which ensued on its reception. Are we then at a loss to know what was the nature of the gift which the Holy Spirit brought for the purposes of the apostolic work? Certainly it was vast and various — u a sevenfold gift ; " but its most essential part lay not in tongues and powers which witnessed to the Gospel, not iu the fervor and boldness which preached it, rather it was the Gospel itself. The Gospel which the Apostles preached consisted of two elements, a testimony of external facts which fell within the region of the senses, and a testimony of the virtue of those facts in the predestined government of God, and of the con- sequences of them in the spiritual history of men, neither of which was it possible for the senses to certify. For the first testimony they needed but a clear and faithful memory. For the second also the same faculty would suffice, but only up to a certain point ; namely, as far as they had received and understood the exposition of transcendental truth from the lips of the Lord Jesus. But we have seen that the sal* vation only began to be spoken by the Lord, and that he himself asserted that it would not be fully revealed byhirn, or understood by them, until the Spirit came. If the Spirit on his coming did rot complete that revelation, then thi 1 1 Cor. ii. 9-16. 1 20 THE PROGRESS OF DOCTRINE. LECT. IV. Gospel which the Apostles preached must have been, in som« of its most important features, partly a word of God and partly a word of man. Their witness of the death, and resurrection, and ascension of jesus would demand an un- qualified acceptance, but their representation of the sacrifi- cial character and atoning merits of the death, of the lifr- giving power of the resurrection, and of the meditorial office in heaven, would be the result of their own inferences from the words which they had gleaned from their Lord ; and, instead of being judged of no man, they would be judged of every man who could take a different view of the words which they repeated from that which they had taken them- selves. (9) Thus the whole system of their doctrine would stand (like the image in the dream) on feet part of iron and part of clay, and would not wait long for the hour of its overthrow. But he who, in the face of all which has been now recalled to mind, should still treat their doctrine In this light, would plainly accuse of falsehood, not only the men, but their Lord himself; who, if he spoke true when he gave them the Spirit, led them thereby "into all the truth." Thy guarantees for this fact could hardly have been plainer or stronger than they are. We thank God that he has pro- vided them, and we pass into the second stage of New 1 es- tanient teaching with adequate assurances that he who be- fore taught us on earth, now teaches us from heaven, and that we still "hear him and are taught in 7dm." II. We have not then changed our teacher, but he has changed his method : and I have now to point out the rca* sons of the change, by showing that it was fitted to conduct the advance of doctrine from the point at which it had tiieu arrived. It may be said that the change was simply a matter of LECT. IV. THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES. 121 necessity , because he who had spoken "with his lips was now to be received up into gloiy, and could no longer talk with ais servants on earth. But though the change might ba necessary, it was also "expedient" — expedient for them. So he represents it to his mourning and perplexed disciples, and adds the support of a strong asseveration. " Never- theless I tell you the truth, it is good for you that I go away ; for if I go not away the Comforter will not come unto you." * The change then takes place as an advantage to those who are subjected to it. For them a stage of reve- lation Ires come which demands a method of teaching more penetrating and internal than that which they had till then enjoyed. It is in this character that the superiority of the later method consists, as is pointed out by the plain distinction, " He dwelleth with you, and shall be in you." Here are two methods appropriated to the two stages of New Testa- ment teaching : and it is clear as day that the second is an advance upon the first. In the one, the teaching power is separated from, and external to, the mind which is being taught ; in the other, it is interfused and commingled with it. The words, in the one, are divine announcements fitted to form the apprehensions of man ; the words, in the other, are expressions of human apprehensions already formed under the divine agency. The teaching power has thus changed its method, in order to meet the exigencies of a more difficult stage of instruction. The facts are finished when Jesus is glorified ; the mani- festation of the Son of God is perfect, the redemption u 1 John xvi. 7. 122 THE PROGRESS OF DOCTRINE. LECT. IV, accomplished, and the conditions of human salvation are complete. The history must now be treated as a whole, of which the plan and purpose have become apparent. The time is come for the full interpretation of the facts, of their effects in the world of spirit, and of their results in human consciousness. A doctrine then is needed, which shall s lm up the whole bearing of the manifestation of Christ, which shall throw a full light on its spiritual effects, and which shall guide tbo minds of men in their application of it to themselves. Such a doctrine might be given from God in one of two ways : by voices from heaven, declaring what view men ought to take of the history which had passed before them, and who* their faith and feelings ought to be concerning it ; or by voices from men themselves, expressing the view which they did take, and the faith and feelings which were actually in their hearts. In the one case, we should have Apostles, who would be to us the messengers of God, only while they tes- tified that they had received such and such revelations, and while they recited those revelations to us word for word ; but all their other words would come to us on their own merits, as simply the words of holy and enlightened men. In the other case, we should have Apostles, whose represen- tations of their own view of all which they had heard and seen, whose expositions of their own convictions and feel- ings, and of the processes of their own thoughts concerning the things of Christ, would be to us so many revelations from God of what he intended to be the result of the mani- festation of his Son in human hearts. Who does not see that this kind of teaching would ex- ceed the other in completeness and effectiveness? It would be more complete ; for we should tins have the word pro- LECT. TV. the ACTS OF THE APOSTLES. 123 sentecl to us in the final form which it was meant to take, that, namely, of a zoord dwelling in us — a divine announce- ment changed already into a human experience. It would be more effective ; inasmuch as example is more so than precept, and the same voice, being to us both the voice of God and the voice of man, would affect our hearts with the double power of certainty and sympathy. Such a method of teaching could only be possible under some system of divine action which should fuse into one the thoughts of God and the thoughts of man ; and this was effected by the gift of the Holy Ghost to the Apostles for the work whereto they were called. I say for the work whereto they ivere called, for the same Spirit is diverse in operation, and divides to every man severally as he will. When the Church was anointed from above, the manifestation of the Spirit pervaded her whole frame, "like the precious ointment on the head, which ran down upon the beard, even upon Aaron's beard, and went down to the skirts of his garments." Even " on the servants and on the handmaids " did the Lord pour out of his Spirit, and the supernatural presence was disclosed in a vast scale of various gifts, ranging from that which was intense and supreme to that which was superficial and ancillary. But we speak now of that which was supreme. "First Apostles." The ointment is poured first upon the head ; and from thence the glittering drops descend upon the raiment. All the members have not the same office : — Are all apostles? No! the authorities, standards, and types of truth are so b}' direct commission, and the gift which they receive is one which makes them so indeed. As the office, so is the gift. An incommunicable office has an incommunicable gift. An office which is to be solitary 124 TIIE PROGRESS OF doctrine. Lect. IV. and supreme in the Church forever has a gift adequate to Eecure the implicit confidence of long-descending ages. Voices ma} T be heard among us now which tend to im- pair that confidence ; complaints of the distinctive use of the word " inspiration,'' as applied to the Scripture writers, assertions that " the Scriptures are before, and above all things, the voice of the congregation." On what do these complaints and assertions rest? On the true conviction, that, in all the Church, and in all ages, there is the presence of the same Spirit. Yes ! and on the false assumption, that the gifts of the Spirit are to all the same gifts. There is no principle in the Bible more clear, than that the gifts of the Spirit are diverse, and are, in character and proportion, adapted to the works which God assigns, and appropriated to the offices which he creates. Now it is certainly one thing to be a member, and another thing to be a founder, of the church. It is one thing to receive or to propagate the truth, and another to deliver it with the authority of God, and to certify it to the world forever- The same clear view of the way of salvation, and of the unsearchable riches of Christ, which gladdened the soul of St. Paul, might gladden the soul of one who heard his words, and raa} T now gladden the soul of one who reads ♦.horn. For both there is the same Spirit and the same testimony ; but the Spirit is given to the one, that he may originate that testimony ; to the other, that he may receive it. There is a difference between being builded into the holy temple, which is the habitation of God through the Spirit, and being constituted a foundation, on which the future building is to rise at first and to rest forever. Such rras the separate function of the Apostles of the Lord and LECT. IV. THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES. 125 Saviour, a function which they shared with the special messengers of God who went before them, and even with their Lord himself. "Ye are built," said they to their brethren, — " Ye are built on the foundation of the Apos- tles and Propnets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner-stone." * The corner-stone is but part of the founda- tion, though it be the first and the chief part ; and this consolidation of the comer-stone with the adjacent founda- tions, as one basement to sustain the building, exhibits in the plainest manner the fact, that the Church, in respect of its faith, rests upon a testimony which was delivered, parti}' by Jesus Christ in person, and partly by the agents whom for that purpose he ordained. Their inspiration as be- lievers associates them with the whole Church ; their inspiration as teachers unites them only with their Lord. The consciousness of this position appears in the records of their preaching, and breathes through all their writings a lofty and un3 T ielding authority. They speak as men having the Spirit to those to whom it is also given, yet as men empowered to deliver the truth which the others were only enabled to receive. St. Paul addresses himself to " those that are spiritual," but he shows them that it is he, and not they, who is " put in trust with the Gospel," and that the word which he utters is one to which they can add nothing, and in which they can change nothing. St. John exhorts those " who have an unction from the Holy One," but as having himself a kind of anointing in which they do not share, whereby he delivers the " message," and the " witness," and the "commandment," which they on their part recognize and accept. No ! the voice that sounds lEph. ii. 20. 126 THE PROGRESS OF DOCTRINE. LECT- IV. from these pages is not the voice of the congregation, but the voice of those who founded it by the will of God ; and that character the congregation itself has asserted for the word in all ages. The written word has been the canon of the Church, because it was a voice which came to it, not because it was a voice which proceeded /rem it. (10) To us at this day this word has come ; and to us at thia day the anointing from the Holy One flows down. For you, for me (thank God ! ) the teaching of the Spirit remains. It remains for the servants and the handmaids : and many an obscure and lowly brother in the streets around us can say for himself, as truly as St. Paul could say, " I have received the Spirit that is of God, that I may know the things which are freely given to me of God." But one who thus speaks can know that his convictions are really the teaching of the Spirit of God only in so far as they correspond with the eternal types of truth, which ascertain to us what the teaching of the Spirit is. Now, as in those apostolic days, he which is spiritual can show that he is so only " by acknowledging that the things which " those appointed teachers " wrote to us are the commandments of the Lord ; " for the gift of the Holy Ghost to others is not a gift whereby they originate the knowledge of new truths, but a gift whereby they recog- nize and apprehend the old unchanging mystery, still receiving afresh the one revelation of Christ, ever approach- ing, never surpassing the comprehensive but immovable boundaries of the faith once delivered to the saints. This is the gift, the only gift, which we desire for our Church and for ourselves ; for it is one which makes the written word a living word, which fills a Church with joy, arid seals a soul for glory. LECTURE V. THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES. THET CEASED NOT TO TEACH AND PREACH JESUS CHRIST. — AcU 9. 42. Jesus Christ is gone up into glory, and the Holy Ghost has come down into men : and we have seen that these events are represented to us, not as closing the course of revelation, but as opening a new stage of it. The ques- tions which met us on the threshold have been answered, and we go forward with the full assurance that our first teacher is our teacher still, and that his second method of instruction is an advance upon the first. We have now to ask, first, What change appears in the aspect of the doctrine? and then, What is the plan on which it continues to advance ? For a reply to these questions I address myself to that introductory book which gives us the external historj' of this part of the dispensation of truth. It is not the func- tion of a historical record to work out expositions of doc- trine, but such a book may be expected to present the general character which the doctrine bore, and to clear to our view the agencies and the stages by which it was matured. This is precisely what is done in the book of Acts. It is the purpose of the book to do it ; a purpose which ought to be more fully recognized than it is. There are works which are done with so natural and graceful a facility, that it seems to the superficial observer as if any one could have done them, or as if he who dii 127 128 THE PROGRESS OF DOCTRINE. LECT. V. them was only guided by, casual impulse, while a more careful student will perceive that singular gifts were neces- sary to produce the results which seem so easy, and that a comprehensive design and an accurate judgment presided over arrangements which appear fortuitous. Such a work is the Acts of the Apostles. In a narrative all alive with graphic details, and written in a style of animated sira« plicity and natural ease, it carries us through a period of human history of incalculable interest and importance: one in which the effects of the manifestation of the Son of God were developed and tested ; in which the life which he had introduced among men disclosed its nature and power, and the truth which he had left commenced its struggles and conquests ; in which the Christian Church was consti- tuted, gradually detached from its Jewish integuments, and brought to the consciousness of its freedom and catho- licity ; in which it verified its credentials, proved its arms, recognized its destinies, and commenced its victories ; in which impulses were given which would never cease to vibrate and precedents were established to which distant ages would refer ; in which solemn and exciting scenes, marvels and miracles, saintly and heroic characters, their labors, their conflicts, their sufferings, their journeyings, their collisions with all classes of men, seem to force upon the historian a confusing multiplicity of materials. Yet through all this he makes his way straight in one direction, as a man guided by that instinct of selection which belongs to the ruling presence of a definite purpose. It is just this definiteness of purpose which is apt to pass unobserved it is nowhere announced, and the unconstrained freedom cf manner and easy inartificial style suggest no thought of it. We seem sometimes to be reading a collection of anecdotes LKCT. V. THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES. 129 or personal memoirs of certain Apostles, and some critiea have dealt with the book as if indeed it were but a chance collection of stories with which the author had happened to become acquainted, or as if a fragment of the acts of St Peter had been prefixed to a journal of the travels of St. Paul. But we know St. Luke's intelligent, inquiring mind, his opportunities of information, his " perfect understanding of all things from the very first," his personal intercourse with those " who from the beginning had been eye-witnesses and ministers of the word." We cannot for a moment suppose that his acquaintance with the " Acts of the Apos- tles " was limited to the facts recorded in the book ; that he knew nothing of the proceedings of John or James, or of the manifold movements and events which were going on by the side of those which he has related. In fact, there is not a book upon earth in which the principle of inten- tional selection is more evident to a careful observer. There is indeed no reason given why one speech is re- ported and one event related at length, in, preference to others which are passed over or slightly touched ; } T et when we reach the conclusion we see the reasons in tha result. We find that by an undeviating course we have followed the development of the true idea of the Church of Christ, in its relations first to the Jewish system, out of which it emerges, and then to the great world, to which it opens itself. When the words and deeds of Philip or Stephen, of Peter or Paul, are implicated with this progress of filings, we find ourselves in their company, but when we part from St. Peter without notice of his after-course, when we leave St. Paul abruptly at the commencement of his two years in Rome, we are given to understand that we have be'Mj 6* 130 THE PROGRESS OF DOCTRINE. LECT. V. reading, not their personal memoirs, but a higher history, which certain portions of their careers serve to embody of to illustrate. Even when the book is considered by itself, the unity and completeness of the result is plain ; but when we look at it in its place in Scripture, observe its function ther*, and its relation to the books which follow, we see most clearly the definite purpose with which it places us and keeps us in that particular line of historical fact which involves the progress of doctrine. It may be said that this is claiming too much ; for that, whatever amount of design may be attributed to the author of the u Acts," we cannot ascribe to him the prophetic pur- pose of fitting his book to its present place in Scripture. No, certainly not to him ; but the Church has ever held that another Mind presided over what was written in these pages, a Mind which purposed that we should have a Bible, and which, guiding the production of its component parts, has made it what it is. I speak in accordance witli this view of Scripture when I ask, What is the office which the book of Acts fulfils in the evolution of doctrine in the New Testament? For a reply to this question I would point to three results which the book unquestionably yields. 1. It places in the clearest light the divine authority of the doctrine given during the period which it covers, as a doctrine delivered by those who, for that particular pur- pose, were filled with the Holy Ghost, and were agents of the personal administration of the Lord Jesus Christ. This, the first and most important part of the office of tb« book, has been considered in the last Lecture. 2. It represents the general character of the doctrine delivered by the Apostles to the world. LECT. V. THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES. 131 3. It traces the steps of external history through which th* doctrine was matured. These are the parts of its office on which I have now to dwell. I. The general character of the doctrine as it appears in the Acts of the Apostles is presented in the words of the text, " They ceased not to teach and preach Jesus the Christ." 1 Similar expressions continually recur: ft he preached Christ unto them ; " 2 " he preached unto him Jesus;" 3 " he preached Christ in the synagogues;" 4 they " spake unto the Grecians preaching the Lord Jesus ; " 5 " he preached unto them Jesus and the resurrection." 6 No such announcements as these are heard in the Gospels, The preaching spoken of there is not of the person but of the kingdom. Jesus comes "preaching the kingdom of God ; " 7 " preaching the Gospel of the kingdom ; " 8 and his parables and common teaching are not prominently about himself, but about " the kingdom of heaven." So also his disciples are sent out " to preach the kingdom of God," and are even charged to " tell no man that he was Jesus the Christ," 9 and are forbidden to publish the mani- festation of the fact " until the Son of Man be risen again from the dead." 10 And because of the absence of this per- sonal proclamation by himself or his servants, we find John the Baptist troubled and perplexed, and sending a deputa- tion of his followers in the hope of extracting such a pub- lic declaration ; and the multitude at a later time complain 1 obn knavovro diSdOKOVTes nal evayyeh^ofievoi 'Ir/oovv rbv Xpiffrw, 9 Acts viii. 5. 3 Ibid. 35. 4 Ibid. ix. 20. • Acts xi. 20. 6 Ibid. xvii. 18. 7 Luke ix. 2. « Matt. iv. 23, and Mark i. 14. • Matt. xvi. 20. »• Matt. xvii. 9. 132 THE PROGRESS OF DOCTRINE. LeCT. V. " How long dost thou make us to doubt? If thou bo the. Christ, tell us plainly ; " * and the High Priest, at the very last, unable to obtain testimony to such a public claim, id compelled to resort to adjuration — "Art thou the Christy the Son of the Blessed?" 2 The change in the key-note of the preaching is very sig- nificant. Things had been tending towards it. The pre- sentation of Christ to men had been going forward, and the scheme on which it is set before us in the Gospel collection marks the gradual manner in which the eye, looking for the kingdom, had come to be fixed upon the person. In the teaching of the first Gospel the idea of the kingdom, in that of the last the idea of the person, is predominant. In the Acts the two expressions are sometimes united, as when the Samaritans " believed Philip preaching the things concern- ing the kingdom of God and the name of the Lord Jesus : " 3 and yet again, with more evident purpose, in the end of the book, where Paul's exposition to the Jews at Pome stands as the last appeal to that people — "To whom he ex- pounded, testifying the kingdom of God and persuading them concerning Jesus : " and yet again in the closing verse, which describes the two years' continuous ministry by the words "preaching the kingdom of God, and teaching those things which concern the Lord Jesus Christ." 4 Evidently 1 John x. 24. 2 Mark xiv. 61. 3 Acts viii. 12. 4 Acts xxviii. 23, 31. Aia/j-aprvpo/xEvog ttjv fiaoLleiav tov Qeov y neidov re ai}Toi>Q tu nepl tov "Irjaov. (ver 23.) Ktjpvccjcjv tt}v fiaoiXeiav tov Oeov, koI Mhenuv tu TTspl tov Kvpiov 'lijaov. (ver. 31.) Compare this sum- mary of the apostolic teaching at the end of the book with the summary of the last teaching of Jesus at its beginning : 6i' ijfiepuv naaapaKOVTa bnTavofievoq avTolc ical "keyov tu. irepl r^f fiao&tiac tov Qeoi LECT. V. THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES. 133 on purpose are the two expressions combined in this final summary, in order to show that the preaching of the king- dom and the preaching of Christ are one : that the original proclamation has not ceased, but that in Christ Jesus the thing proclaimed is no longer a vague and future hope, but a distinct and present fact. In the conjunction of these words the progress of doctrine appears. All is founded upon the old Jewish expectation of a kingdom of God ; but it is now explained how that expectation is fulfilled in the person of Jesus ; and the account of its realization con- sists in the unfolding of the truth concerning him, " the things concerning Jesus." 1 The manifestation of Christ being finished, the kingdom is already begun. Those who receive Mm enter into it. Having overcome the sharpness of death, he has opened the kingdom of heaven to all be- lievers. Those, therefore, who were once to " tell no man that he was Christ," are now to make " all the house of Israel know assuredly that God hath made that same Jesus, whom they had crucified, both Lord and Christ ; " yea, they are to proclaim that fact to every nation under heaven. It is, I apprehend, by this change in the character of the preaching, that we are to explain the surprising difference in the effect of the preaching, as seen in the Gospels and in the Acts. For some three years, probably, did Jesus preach in the Temple, in synagogues, in houses, on the seashore, and by the wayside ; yet it is obviously but a scanty band of professed believers whom he leaves upon the earth, and these too appear possessed but with a dubious and uncer- " during forty days appearing to them and speaking the thing! toncerning the kingdom of God." 1 rd, nepl tov y \vaov. 134 THE PROGRESS OF DOCTRINE. LECT. V tain faith. On occasion of an important gathering in Jeru- salem, " the number of names together were about an hun- dred and twenty." * The largest number we ever hear of is that mentioned by St. Paul — "above five hundred breth- ren at once ; " 2 and of these, according to St. Matthew, 45 some doubted." 3 But a few days later Peter lifts up his voice, and " the same day there were added unto them about three thousand souls." 4 And so the word grows and multiplies, till we hear of " a great company of priests obedient to the faith," 6 and "many thousands 8 of Jews which believe ; " 7 besides the suddenly-rising, rapidly-grow- ing Churches in all parts of the Gentile world. Men have sometimes expressed their wonder at this difference in the effect of the Lord's own preaching and of that of his disci- ples ; and they have been fain to ascribe it to the outpour- ing of the Spirit, which wrought a sudden change in the hearts of the hearers. But we have no encouragement to suppose that the three thousand who believed on the day of Pentecost received airy special gift of the Spirit (such as originated on that day) until after they believed. This was promised by the Apostle as a gift, not preceding, but ensu- ing on their baptism. u Repent," said he, " and be bap- tized ever}' one of you for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost." No ! It is not on the hearers, but on the preachers that the mighty influ- ence is said to have come. The true reason for the change in the effect of the doctrine is found in the change which had passed upon the doctrine itself, when " the Spirit of truth was come" to fulfil the prediction, " He shall glorifj 1 Acts i. 15. * 1 Cor. xv. (?. 8 Matt, xxviii. 17. 4 Acts ii. 41. 6 Ibid. vi. 7. 6 Literally, myriads. 1 Acts xxi. 20. LECT. V. THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES. 135 me." Christ was not preached before he suffered ; after he was glorified he was. In the former period, he and his fol- lowers " preached the kingdom of God ; " in the latter, " they ceased not to teach and preach Jesus Christ." Thus the great change in the effect of the preaching, which might seem at first sight to derogate from his glory, is, on further consideration, seen to enhance it. Only when it is possible freely and fully to publish the one " name under heaven given among men, whereby they must be saved," are theii consciences thoroughly roused and their trust decisively secured. So has it been, and so shall it be in the Church forever. Oh, that the apostolic lesson may still have its fruit amongst ourselves ! that our evangelists may stiii know where their power lies ! and especially that it may be said of all who go forth to the work from this place, "They ceased not to teach and preach Jesus Christ ! " 2. But now comes the question, What was this preaching of Christ? Some have paraphrased it as the preaching of his doctrine, of the holy lessons which he taught. Some, again, as the setting forth of his holy character, the beauty of his life, and the attraction of his love. Bat if this were the main idea of preachiDg Christ, then certainly the rela- tive effect of his own teaching and of that of his disciples ought to have been jast the reverse of what it was ; for the actual hearing of the gracious words which proceeded out of his mouth, and the actual sight of his holiness and love, must be supposed more effectual than the mere account of them by others. Then Jesus Christ ought to have gathered the thousands and his disciples the hundreds ; and the faith inspired in the first period ought to have been more decided and intense than that awakened in the second. But the contrary was the case. There was then something in ths 136 THE PROGRESS OF DOCTRINE. LECT. V later preaching which was not present in the earlier. Wag it that the Messiahship of Jesus was then openly proclaimed, which men had before been left to infer from the thing? which they heard and saw? It was this — but more than this. Not only was the fact of the Messiahship proclaimed, but the nature of it was explained. The Christ who wag now proclaimed was one who had died and risen again, and whom the heavens had received till the time of the restitu- tion of all things. In these three fact* the manifestation of the Son of God had culminated, ano in them the true character of his mission had appeared. The old carnal thoughts of it had been left in his grave, and could never rise from it asrain. It was the " Prince of life " who had risen from the dead ; it was the " King of glory" who had passed into the heavens. And no less did these facts de- clare the spiritual consequences of his manifestation ; since they carried with them the implication of those three cor- responding gifts, which we celebrate forevermore, saying with solemn joy, " I believe . . . the forgiveness of sins, the resurrection of the body, and the life everlasting." Towards these topics the preaching of Christ in the Acts of the Apostles continually turns. Observe how the first and present blessing (the forgiveness of sins) is ever ad- duced, as the result of the wondrous history v?hich the chosen witnesses rehearse. When they have told of the cross and passion, it is in this consequence flowing from it unto men that their sermons culminate and close. "Dim hath God exalted to be a Prince and a Saviour, to give re- pentance to Israel and forgiveness of sins ;" l " Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ, 1 Acts v. 81. LfOT. V. THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES. 131 for the remission of sins ; " ' " Repent ye thereiore and be converted, that yonr sins maybe blotted out;" 2 " Be it known unto you therefore, men and brethren, that through this man is preached unto }'ou the forgiveness of sins ; and by him all that believe are justified from all things from which ye could not be justified b}^ the law of Moses ; " 3 "To him give all the prophets witness, that through his name whoso- eier believeth on him shall receive. remission of sins." 4 Such is the burden of the apostolical preaching, as ex- hibited in the rapid sketches and brief summaries given in this book. It is a doctrine of "redemption by his blood, even the forgiveness of sins," conveying, through the sim- ple act of faith, a present cleansing to the conscience, as the necessary qualification for the glory which is to follow. Then, in the next place, that glory is shown to arise frorn the resurrection of Jesus, as the preparation for it does from his sufferings. I need not remind you of the " great power" with which, from one end of the book to the other, " the Apostles give witness of the resurrection of the Lord Jesus." Everywhere they preach a " Christ that died, yea, rather, that is risen again." This event is presented by them not simply as the seal of his teaching, or more gener- ally (to use the poor and shrunken phrase of later times) as the proof of his divine mission, but as itself the cause and the commencement of that new world and eternal life which was consciously " the hope of Israel," and unconsciously the hope of man. Turn especially to the latter part of the book, and study the position taken by St. Paul in the last crisis of hi3 controversy with the Jews. See how he fallr 1 Acts ii. 38. s Ibid. iii. 19. « Ibid. xiii. 38, 39. « Ibid. x. 43. 138 THE PROGRESS OF DOCTRINE. LECT. V, back upon the resurrection of Christ as involving the reali« zation of the hopes of his people and the fulfilment of all the promises of God. Some have treated as a mere expe- dient for his own deliverance at the moment that one voice which he cried in the Council, " Men and brethren, I am a Pharisee, the son of a Pharisee ; of the hope and resurrec' Hon of the dead I am called in question." But he needed no expedient, for he was then in Roman hands and under Roman protection. It was no pretence to serve a turn ; it was the genuine language of his heart. In all his other speeches at this crisis the same idea reigns predominant. *' I stand and am judged for the hope of the promise made of God unto our fathers : unto which promise our twelve tribes, instantly serving God day and night, hope to come : for which hope's sake, King Agrippa, I am accused of the Jews. Why is it judged by you a thing incredible if God raises the dead ? " It is the self-same sound which we heard in the first discourse given us from his lips, when he cried to the Jews of the Pisidian Antioch, "Now we declare unto you glad tidings, how that the promise which was made unto the fathers, God hath fulfilled the same unto us their chil- dren, in that he hath raised up Jesus again" And when we read his mind upon this subject more fully in 1 Cor. xv., and indeed in the whole of his writings, we see how truly the resurrection of Christ did, in his view, include the realization of all the hopes with which the old covenant was pregnant ; how entirely it was to him the cause and actual commencement, as well as the pledge and promise, of the resurrection and the life to man. But I must not go further into this subject. I had only to indicate that the general character of the doctrine which appears in the Acts of the Apostles is an advance upon that LECT. V. THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES. 139 delivered in the Gospels. I say that it is so, inasmuch as it does more than merely testify to the facts of the mani- festation of Christ, as (to use an imperfect illustration) the summing up of a judge is an advance upon the evidence on which it is founded, since it adds to the rehearsal of that evidence the selection of its critical points, the representa- tion of their force and bearing, and the intimation of the conclusions to which the}' lead. Thus does the preaching of the Apostles sum up the result of all that the Gospels have disclosed, by the direct preaching of Jesus to men's souls, and by preaching him especially as the Christ who has been perfected by death and resurrection ; by death which provides for the present necessities of conscience in the forgiveness of sins, and by resurrection which provides for the longings and hopes of the soul in the life everlast- ing. The messengers of God in this book cease not to teach and preach Jesus the Christ, as a Saviour by these means and in this sense. II. It is, however, the book not of the words, but of the acts of the Apostles, and we accordingly find in it the inti- mations rather than the expositions of doctrine. It assists our present inquiry in a manner more appropriate to its historical character, by laying down for us the course of external events through ivhich the doctrine was matured. I have already adverted to the systematic plan of the book, as following out this course of events with the instinct of an undeviating purpose. It carries us straight from the Gospels to the Epistles, as the span of some great bridge continues the road between dissevered regions. Take it away and what a chasm appears ! " Paul, an Apostle of Jesus Christ, to saints that are in Rome, in Corinth, Thes« Balonica, Philippi, Galatia, Ephesus, Colossae." Who is this 140 THE PROGRESS OF DOCTRINE. LECT. V. Paul, and in what sense is he an Apostle? "We knew him not when the twelve were ordained. We saw him not among the witnesses of the resurrection. How came the Gospel to these places? and is it the same Gospel for these Gentiles as it was for the Jews? As for James, and Peter, and John, and Jude, we know and revere their commission : but we saw them last in partial ignorance and error, and we hardly know what the value of their words may be. We have noted on a former occasion the answers to these questions which the book of Acts supplies — the anointing of the Holy Ghost qualifying the men to fulfil the commis- sion which they had received, the guidance of Christ given to their steps and his attestations to their words and works, the call and commission of St. Paul and his special appoint- ment to a special work, and the spread of the Gospel in the world, and the rise of the Gentile Churches. By means of this information we are brought to the point at which we can open the apostolic writings, first with a due sense of their divine authority, and then with a sufficient acquaint- ance with the persons, scenes, and facts with which they are connected, and (I may further add) with effective sup- ports to our conviction of their genuineness and authentic- ity. But neither of these functions of the book is precisely that for which we now inquire. Between Gospels and Epis- tles there is need for a connection of a more internal kind. During the intervening time the doctrine was not only spreading, it was clearing and forming itself, or rather was being cleared and formed by the hand of its Divine Au- thor. This was effected through a certain line of events and through the agency of particular persons. With these rvents and persons the Book of Acts is occupied. It begins at Jerusalem, it ends at Rome. Between these LEOT. V. THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES. 141 two points questions have been settled, principles carried out, and divinely implanted tendencies disclosed. Espe cially have the relations of the Gospel to Jew and Gentile been fixed forever. We see how all the story progressively ministers to this result. First Peter presents the Gospel as the fulfilment of prophecy and completion of the covenant made with the fathers. Then the Hellenist element seems to eclipse the Hebrew, and Stephen rises to reason and to die. A large space is therefore given to the speech, which sets forth the progressive nature of the dealings of God with Israel, and shows the drift of that current of thought ou which we arp launched. The death of Stephen is not only an individual martyrdom, like that of James, so briefty mentioned after- wards ; it is a great crisis, and stands as such in the narra- tive, with a clear intimation of the position which waa assumed on the one side and rejected on the other. Straightway the Gospel spreads. First Hebrew, then Hellenist, by the ministry of Philip it soon becomes Samaritan, and at the next step by that of Peter goes in to men uncircumcised. In the story of Cornelius we have a detailed statement of the means b}^ which the Lord mani- fested his will, that the Gentiles should hear the word and believe. Then we pass from the side of Peter to that of the new Apostle, to whom the carrying out of this principle is committed. Antioch becomes our starting-point, where the disciples are first called Christians. We follow the steps of the traveller, and see far and wide that God hath also to the Gentiles granted repentance unto life. Then an opposing power is felt within the Church, and Christian Judaism asserts that there is departure from the original scheme. The Council meets, and by testimonies of Scrip* 142 THE PROGRESS OF DOCTRINE. LECT V. ture and of fact infers the verdict of God, and issues the high decision, " It seemed good to the Holy Ghost and to us." Then, and not till then, Europe is entered, and th8 great centres of Greek life are occupied ; but still in every place does the Apostle address himself first to the Jews., and everywhere they reject and persecute him. Finally, he returns to the head-quarters of the nation, and presents himself there with every circumstance of conciliation, but claiming his place in the covenant and as a preacher of the hope of Israel. The scenes and speeches of that crisis are given with fulness, because they define the position of the Christianity which St. Paul represents towards the Jewish system, and its final and furious rejection by the Jewish people. l " Believing all things which are written in the Law and in the Prophets, and having committed nothing against the people or customs of his fathers," 2 he and his creed are forced from their proper home. On it as well as him the Temple doors are shut. Last- ly, before the Jews at Rome he closes the long struggle with the peroration furnished him by prophecy : — "Well spake the Holy Ghost by Esaias the prophet unto our fathers, saying, Go unto this people and say, Hearing ye shall hear, and shall not understand ; and seeing ye shall see, and not perceive. For the heart of this people is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes have they closed ; lest they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and understand with their 1 Not, as some have put it, because Luke happened to be pres- ent. Rather, Luke was present because the scenes npd speeche* were to be reported. 2 Acts xxiv. 14; xxviii. 17. LECT. V. THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES, 143 heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them. Be it known therefore unto you, that the salvation of God is sent unto the Gentiles, and that they will hear it." * Now let no man think that the rejection of Jews and ad- mission of Gentiles were the only result of this long history. Another result has been involved in it : Christianity itself has been finally drawn out of Judaism, the delicate and intricate relations of the two systems being dealt with in such a way, that (so to speak) the texture of living fibre has been lifted unimpaired out of its former covering, leaving behind only a residuum of what was temporary, preparatory, and carnal. In fact, the doctrine of the Gos- pel has been cleared and formed ; cleared of the false element which the existing Judaism would have infused into it, and formed of the true elements which the old covenant had been intended to prepare for its use. Two great principles, it seems to me, were fought for and secured, which may be expressed (though not with strict accuracy) by saying that the Gospel is the substitute for the Law, and that the Gospel is the heir of the Law. a. In sa} T ing that the Gospel is the substitute for the Law t I do not mean that it is so, as doing what the Law had done before it came, nor yet as doing what the Law had been meant, but had failed, to do ; but only as doing that winch the Law had been supposed to do. The Gospel pro- vides for individual souls the means of justification and the title to eternal life. This the Law had not done, had not been meant to do, and by Prophets and Psalmists had been asserted not to do. Yet it had sunk deep into the mind of those who were under it, that this was the very thing i Acts xxviii. 25-28. 144 THE PROGRESS OF DOC1RINE. LECT. Y. which it did. Scribes taught distinctly, and the people were possessed with the idea, that there had been a law given which could give life, and that righteousness was by that Law. Here was the conviction which had entwined itself Tiiih their patriotism and their religion. Here was \heir pride and boast, and the prerogative which severed them from all mankind. Then, as now, they looked for a Messiah, who was to perfect the keeping of the Law, and (in some sense) to save other nations by reducing them to its obedience, and (as appeared in the sequel) many re- ceived Jesus himself as the Messiah, without any material change in that idea. But when the death of Jesus was preached as procuring, and the resurrection of Jesus as originating eternal life, and when the simple act of faith in him was proclaimed as the means of sharing it, the antago- nism of the two doctrines appeared. It was first in the arguments of Stephen, and afterwards in the preaching of Paul, that this particular feature of the Christian system made itself felt in its bearing on the great Jewish error. Hence the passion, the virulence, and the rancor with which the two men were pursued. " This man ceaseth not to speak blasphemous words against this holy place and the law" * — so ran the accusation against the first martyr : and years afterwards the superintendent of his execution heard the same words shrieked out against himself, " Men of Israel, help ! This is the man who teacheth all men everywhere against the people, and the law, and this place." 2 False aud odious allegations ! Yet the doctrine of which the two men were the great exponents did really involve a flat contradiction of the prevailing i Act* vi. 13. * Ibid. xxl. 28c LECT. V. THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES. 145 Jewish theory about the people, and the law, and that place. Within the Christian Church the same theory held its ground, and in that quarter cost the Apostle a still closer and keener conflict, in order to vindicate and establish for Jew as well as Gentile the great principle, " By grace are ye saved through faith," l or, as St. Peter expressed the same truth, " Through the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ we shall be saved, even as they." 2 Still the anxious pastor in his parish, still the self-obser- vant Christian in his own heart, learns how deep-seated and how stubborn is that principle in human nature, which seeks the starting-point of salvation in self rather than in God, in doing rather than in receiving, in work rather than in grace. By the common Jewish theory of the Law, that principle has fortified itself strongly, and clothed itself gloriously, with the usurped sanctions of God. The Juda- izing doctrine would have perpetuated that usurpation in the Christian Church, and, in so doing, would have neutral- ized the Gospel itself. The keen eye of the selected champion saw in a moment the fatal consequences of cus- toms turned into doctrines, which others, who believed as he did, were perhaps inclined to regard with indulgence T as signs of an affectionate veneration for ancient ordi- nances. In his writings we see how his penetrating eye discerned the danger, and how his unsparing hand averted it : we see also that the intuitive discernment and the impulsive vigor were the result of a deep personal experience, both of the error which he resisted, and of the truth which he defended. In the Acts we are carried through the period of this eon- lEph. 11. 8. • Acts xv. 11. 7 146 THE PHOGRESS OF DOCTKINE. LECT. V, test in the outward course of events, and when the history ceases in the hired house at Rome, the Gospel has fought itself free, and severed itself from Judaism, not merely in its form, but in its essence, proclaiming salvation by the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ, and not by the works of the Law. b. The other principle which is contended for and secured is, that the Gospel is the heir of the Law; that it inherits what the Law had prepared. The Law, on its national and ceremonial side, had created a vast and closely-woven system of ideas. These were wrought out and exhibited by it in forms according to the flesh — an elect nation, a miraculous history, a special covenant, a worldly sanctuary, a perpetual service, an anointed priest- hood, a ceremonial sanctity, a scheme of sacrifice and atonement, a purchased possession, a holy cit} r , a throne of David, a destiny of dominion. Were these ideas to be lost, and the language which expressed them to be dropped, when the Gospel came ? No ! It was the heir of the Law. The Law had prepared these riches, and now bequeathed them to a successor able to unlock and to diffuse them. The Gospel claimed them all, and developed in them a value unknown before. It asserted itself as the proper and predestined continuation of the covenant made of God with the fathers, the real and only fulfilment of all which was typified and prophesied ; presenting the same ideas, which bad been before embodied in the narrow but distinct limits of carnal forms, in their spiritual, universal, and eternal character. The body of t3 T pes according to the flesh died with Christ, and with Christ it rose again a body of antit} r pes according to the Spirit. Those who were after the flesh could not recognize its identity : those who were LECT. V. THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES. 147 after the Spirit felt and proclaimed it. The change was as great, the identity was as real, as in that mystery of the resurrection jf the body which the same preachers showed : in which the earthly frame must lay aside the flesh and blood which cannot inherit the kingdom of God, and must reappear, dead and raised again, another and yet the same, " sown in weakness and raised in power, sown in dishonor and raised in glory, sown a natural body and raised a spiritual body." But I should speak amiss if I left it to appear that the Gospel inherited the ideas only of the preceding dispensa- tion, and not, in one sense, their form also. Their written form it did inherit, unchanged and unchangeable. The Law and the Prophets, as scriptures, as a book, were stili under the new dispensation what the} 7 had been under the old — the voice of the Spirit and the word of God. Nay ! this written word belonged to the new dispensation more truly than to the old, for these scriptures also were now raised to newness of life, and were recognized as prepared for the uses to which they were now applied, and written less for the immediate than for the ulterior purposes , as St. Peter has expressed it, " Not unto themselves, but unto us they did minister the things which are now reported unto you by them that have preached the Gospel unto you with the Holy Ghost sent down from heaven." * This is ever the position of St. Paul, for, as one has truly said, " None of the Apostles has laid such stress upon the Holy Scripture as the Apostle of the Spirit and liberty." 2 And as this appears in his writings, so does it also in the hi* 1 1 Peter i. 12. * Bauingarten on the Acts, vol. iiL 78 (Clarke'* Tr.). 148 THE PROGRESS OF DOCTRINE. LECT. V. tory. From his first reported speech at the Pisidian Antioch, 1 which bases all upon the Scriptures, still he goes on with the Scriptures in his hand, till he stands and is judged, " believing all things which arc written in the Law and in the Prophets ; " 2 and finally parts from the Roman Jews after "persuading them concerning Jesus, both out of the Law of Moses and out of the Prophets, from morn- ing till evening." 3 This then is the position taken at the beginning and fought for to the end ; and it is a striking sight to see how resolutely St. Paul insists tha£ he and his doctrine are the true representatives of th* T