• fe ^ ■» <,^ 'o , . »• «*"■ %. 0< c° ■ 0(? .^^ °^ ► ^ f^ U. .^^. oK ^"^-K^ .Ci °. "oV" ^;*^^' ^ T • o^ ^^" %>^ ^■'- u ^ A^ 'H,"^- <^^ ^V^'^^. 1^ «<* - , " ,,(?-.,? ^^ .0^ ^^^^ ^^, .& ' /^V/k'- -^^^ c-^"^*^ W 1^ .»•.•»■. ^; HISTORY OF THE TOWN OF FRANKLIN, MASS.; FROM ITS SETTLEMENT TO THE COMPLETION OF ITS FIRST CENTURY, 2d March, 18T8; GjNEALOGICAL NOTICES OF ITS EARLIEST FAMILIES, SKETCHES *^fP/ ITS Professional Men, and a Report of ''^^is^HE Centennial Celebration. LIBRAK^ f 'Vi. «.,»«, ^S. ^Qc- ^^'^^^^^ By MOIITIMER BLAKE, Member of Old Colony Historical SocMky ; Honorary Member of New England HiSTORIC-GKNEALOdiCAL SOCIETY. FEANKLIN-, MASS. PUBLISHED BY THE COMMITTEE OF THE TOWN. 1879. |_| / COPYRIGHT SECURED BY THE AUTHOR. J. A. & E. A. Rfid, Printers, Pioridence, R. I. INTRODUCTION. Please c-ontit the following eiTOi-s : Pairc 54, line 4th, for "has" read "had." " 62, " 10th, after "ha^" insen "since." " &1, " .ith from bottom, after "steps" insert "were. " 88, " l'2th, read "missionary." " 90, " 3d from bottom, insert "60 feet." " 107, " 20th, for "one" read "our." " 12.T, " 7th from bottom, read "headed." " ;87, erase lines 21-24. " 194, last line, erjise last clause. " 206, transpose 8th and 9th lines. " 227, la.et line, read "nannes." The committee were unanimous in their choice of historian — Rev. Mortimer Blake, D. D., of Taunton, Mass. His marked ability and well-known antiquarian researches, especially con- nected with the early history of Franklin, abundantly qualified him for this important work. Dr. Blake with some reluctance entered upon the task, which he would not have undertaken for any town but his own. At the annual town meeting, in March, 1878, the committee was enlarged by the addition of five members — Messrs. A. St. John Chambre, Henry M. Greene, James P. Ray, Paul B. Clark, PREFACE. •lud Edward A. Kaud. to assist in the aooumulating duties and preparations arisino- from the approach of the centennial celebra- tion. To the united committee Dr. Blake presented his valuable manuscript, Avhich, at\er examination and discussiou, was unaui- mouslv accepted and ordered to be printed. In presentino- this volume to the citizens of Frankhn and the public o-eneraUv, the committee feel that the reputation of the author as a historian and scholar is sutiicient pledge of its vtilue. They are coutident that it will be found to be a rare history, abounding in t-icts, incidents, narratives, biogi-aphy, genealogy, and whatever belongs to a superior town history -all enriched by the author's terse style and originality of thought. Walpo Daxiels, S. W. KlCHAKDSOX, William M. Thayee, William Rockwoop, Apix D. Salgext, Frasklix. December, ISTS. A. St. Joux Cuambke, 11. M. GnEEXE. James T. Kay. Tail B. Clark, Edwakd a. Kaxp, Centennial Committee. HISTORICAL ADDRESS. Mr. Pkesident, the Honored Chief Magistrate of this Common- "WEAETH AND HIS Associates IN Office, Kinsfolk and Friends — Ladies and Gentlemen : A liimdred years are crowding to tell their tales to-day. It will not, therefore, permit much time for introductory salutations. We will just congratulate one another that we are allowed to be here, at the centennial epoch of this grand old town, give a welcome hand to the sons and daughters who have come back (some from long distances) to this home of their childhood, and then we will stand aside to let the century talk of the men and their deeds who have given us a town history worth commemorating. I must preface, however, that it was with great timidity I consented to be the spokesman of this hour. Living so far and so long from the sources of information, and crowded with the never-finished work of my vocation, it has only been by short visits and broken explorations that I have searched records to collate the story of this town's past. If the results seem meagre, please charge it — not to want of interest in the seeking, but to lack of time and material. And, had it not been for the zealous co-operation of your committee in charge of this celebration, and of other interested citizens, and the cordial responses of the town clerks into whose records the sources of our town history run back, and of Wrentham in particular, the present address would be still more meagre. To all who have aided in this service, let me here present my cordial acknowledgments. So much only will my short hour permit me to say for introduction. 6 HISTORY OF FRANKLIN. The life and roundness of our story have decayed in the lapse of time, leaving but a skeleton of dismembered facts. I am appointed to wire together these scattered bones and reclothe the framework of our past with the motor forces and flush of a recovered life. If I can so much as make the cen- tury stand before you, I shall feel amply rewarded, even if the countenance be lack-lustre and homely. The century we commemorate to-day by no means carries us back to the beginning of the town. To reach the forces which have shaped its character and history, we must go still further back by more than another hundred years. Seventeen hundred and seventy-eight was only when this town became of age and took her place among her sister towns. Her child- hood dates really from 1660, when her mother, Wrentham, first came to live in Wollomonopoag. But her birthday was close upon the beginnings of the Massachusetts colony. To compass, therefore, the full history of this town, we should confer with the original Puritan immigrants of 1630 around the Bay. But such a quest would cover two hundred and fifty years, a period that cannot be compressed within this hour's review. I must, therefore, content myself with the humbler aim of selecting what may seem to be the hinge-facts on which the course and character of our town history have turned. These facts mainly cluster about three points : First, The rights of the settlers to the soil ; Second, The character and aims of the settlers ; and Third, The subsequent development of their history. It may be of no present consequence to learn l)y what title these goodly farms are held ; but it is a satisfaction to know that our ancestors were not lawless trespassers upon their original Indian occupants. And the evidence lies abundant in the colonial charter, the laws of its courts and the purchase deeds of the settlers. By their Patent, the lands belonged to the settlers as a company and not as individuals. But they had the right of distribution among themselves, and they turned to this task with becoming gravity. As a prehminary caution, their court had voted (March 4, 1630) that " no man shall HISTORICAL ADDRESS. 7 buy land of Indians without leave had of the court ; " and, as an immediate necessity, it votes tliat " all swamps of above one hundred acres he free to any freeman to fetch wood." But, interesting as it might be, we must not spend time in waiting upon this court and reporting its cautious and wise conclusions. A few only, which touch our present inquiry, will be quoted. To prevent the scattering and weakening of the settlers, no house shall be built above half a mile from the meeting-house without leave of the court. A special com- mittee shall set out and bound all towns and settle all bound- ary difficulties, and towns may divide up their own lands. As we listen to the debates and orders of this Court of Assist- ants, we gather these conclusions of their policy : None but freemen acceptable to the court shall have any lands ; such shall have lands only as companies and in masses of territory ; for signal service to the colony, however, single persons are paid in special grants of land ; all grants to companies or to individuals are to be set and laid out by and with the approval of the court. The occupants of their soil are thus to be as- sured friends of the colony ; and for a man to become a free- man and proprietor of a farm, is an endorsement of his goodness by the Puritan standard. The court, further, is particular to transfer only its own title to the soil. If the lands granted be subject to any Indian claims, these must be extinguished by the towns themselves. Thus, Concord is directed, in 1637, to purchase the ground within their limits of the Indians, and an agent is chosen in 1638 to agree with the Indians for land in Watertown, Cam- bridge, and Boston. But in 1639 John Bayley is fined five pounds for buying land of Indians without leave. We care- fully note these sample acts, as vindicating the honesty of the Puritans towards the Indians. They are in accord with the general letter from the governor and council of the New Eng- land Company, dated Gravesend, April 17, 1629. "If any of the salvages Ptend right of inheritance to all or any Pt of the lands graunted in or patent, wee pray yo'r cndeav'r to p'rchase their tytle, that wee may avagde the least scruple of intrusion." » HISTOEY OF FRANKLIN, Still lingering about this venerable court of the governor and his assistants, our ears catch the words of an order in which we immediately feel an interest. The session is at New- towne, Sept. 2, 1635, and the order is, " that there shall be a plantation settled about two miles above the falls of Charles river, on the northeast side thereof, to have ground lying to it on both sides the river, both upland and meadow, to be laid out hereafter as the court shall direct." This must have something to do with Franklin, for it is on one side of Charles river. We drop into the session of next year, Sept. 8, 1636, to read on its record : " Ordered that the plantation to be set- tled above the falls of Charles river shall have three years' immunity from public charges as Concord had, to be accounted from the 1st of May next (i. e. 1637) ; and the name of said plantation is to be Deddham, to enjoy all that land on the southerly and easterly side of Charles river not formerly granted to any town or particular persons, and also to have five miles square on the other side of the river." The courts of those days followed rather than led public opinion, and we find, back of this large grant of territory — including now thirteen towns and parts of four others — the impulse of twenty-two solid men, ancestors, some of them, of persons here present.* Our genealogical line is Franklin, "Wrentham, Dcdham, and this line would be the full path of our history, starting from Newtowne Sept. 2, 1G35. We need not go back even so far as Dcdham, for others have already told its story. We will, however, on our way to Wrentham, look in upon Dcdham long enough to form some idea of our ancestral beginnings. Rev. John Allen, the first minister, or Michael Metcalf, the head selectman, can tell us their story. They described their char- acter in the name they have given to their town, " Content- ment," and in this peaceable prelude to their covenant, " We, whose names are hereunto subscribed, in the fear and rever- * These towns, following the compass, are Dedham, Needham, Natick in part, Dover, Sherborne in part, Medfield, Medwaj^ Bellingham mostly, Frank- lin, Wrentham, Norfolk, "Walpole, Foxboro in part, Norwood. HISTORICAL ADDRESS. 9 ence of our Almighty God, miituallj and severally promise amongst ourselves and each other, to profess and practice one faith according to that most perfect rule the foundation where- of is everlasting' love.''' Happily named, Contentment. 8ome of the settlers, however, especially John Dwight and his son Timothy, John Page, and John Rogers, are not con- tented. They remember the old home town in England whence they came, and especially their minister. Rev. John Rogers, grandson of the proto-martyr, John ; and for love of him and of it they change the name of Contentment to Dedham. It is but a few minutes' walk along the short street east of the present court-house. The ninety log-houses are nearly alike, thatched with long grass from the meadows, each with a lad- der from the ground to the chimney, and standing near the front edge of its twelve acres ; which are dotted with stumps and bounded with uneven pole fences. In the rear of these lots are the fields or pastures, called " herd walks " or " cow- commons," simply cleared of timber and burnt over each spring under the oversight of the wood-reeves. Bounding the pastures outside is the virgin forest, filled with wolves more than dogs and hunters can keep under ; although there is a bounty upon their scalps, and there are regulation muskets from three feet nine inches to four feet three inches barrel length, and such noted marksmen as Sargent Ellis and Dea. Ephraim Wilson behind them. In one of these houses Michael Metcalf is keeping school for the year for <£20 — two-thirds part in wheat at the town or country rate, and the other part in corn at the said rate, to be kept, the record says, " at the school-house, except the wether be extreme to hinder, and then he is to attend at his own dwelling-house. The town to have the harth laid in the school-house forthwith, and windows made fitt, and wood for the fire to be laid in. In the heat of the weather, if the said Michael desire to make use of the meeting-house, he may do so, provided the house be kept clean and the windows be made good if broken (as if the young D wights and Fishers and 10 HISTORY OF FRANKLIN. Metcalfs of that day ever threw stones!), the school to begin the 19th of the present month (1656) and the pay quarterly." In another house Michael Powall has, since 1646, kept a licensed ordinary, where we may find a dinner or a bed. Near by him, if exhausted with our toiling through the woods from Boston, we may find something stronger — as the selectmen petitioned in 1658 that, " in regard of their remoteness from Boston, Left. Joshua Fisher (one of their chief men) liave liberty to sell strong waters, to supply the necessity of such as shall stand in need thereof in that town." Here are the elements of a promising civilization ! Besides, there is Capt. Eleazur Lusher " impowered to marry ; " Mr. Edward Allen, John Kingsbury, and John Luson to " order small business under 20 shillings ; " John Haward constable, a barrel of gun- powder, a train band and a small cannon, or drake, presented by the colony to this now called " out towne." But it is drawing towards 1G60, and stories are afloat of a mine of some kind of metal near certain ponds, about thirteen miles to the westward of Dedham, which must be somewhere in this region. The people, alert for any increase of their hard-earned and small incomes, talk it over when they come together " in a lecture day," and the selectmen send out (22° 4m., 1660) four men " to view the lands both upland and meadow near about the ponds by George Indian's wigwam, and make report of what they find to the selectmen in the first opportunity they can take." Six months after, their report gives so much en- couragement that two other men are sent to compound with the Indians for their rights to the soil. But great enterprises like the settlement of new towns in the wilderness must move slowly and cautiously. For it is no trifling afternoon project to vacate a home, though it be just built of logs and thatch in a stump-covered lot, and to forsake companions who have worked in the fields and sat in the rude meeting-house together, and to start everything anew in the forests twenty miles of unbroken paths away. We cannot HISTORICAL ADDRESS. 11 appreciate their obstacles or their hesitancies. But we do admire their cautious deliberations and prudent conclusions. Although the good people of Dedham had talked together of the meadows towards the west, where they had cut hay in 1649, and of the great ponds towards the Narragansett country, and now especially of the mines near them, and of the report of the men sent to explore the western wilderness more thor- oughly, still when the motion was made (27th March, 1661) to begin a plantation and give 600 acres for its encouragement, some objected. But the movement had begun already. Ten men, at least, had gone to break ground in Wollomonopoag, as this region was called. As soon as they heard of this encouragement of the 600 acres, they claimed it as pioneers of the projected settlement. You will recognize their names, if not the persons : Anthony Fisher, Sargent Ellis, Robert "Ware, James Thorp, Isaac Bullard, Samuel Fisher, Samuel Parker, John Farrington, Ralph Freeman, and Sargent Stevens^"^ Some of their descendants are probably here to-day. But Dedham could not be in such haste. It had chosen a committee to attend to three things in due order : First, " to determine when men present themselves for entertainment there, who are meet to be accepted ; " Second, to " proportion ^^ to each man, thus accepted, his part in the 600 acres ; " Third, to " order the settling of the plantation in reference to situa- tion, highways, convenient place for a meeting-house, a lot or lots for church officers, w^ith such other things necessary as may hereafter be proposed." Yet this committee made com- mendable haste, for before the year 1661 closed they reported, and the town of Dedham adopted their boundaries and plan of a settlement. But now the cautiousness has shifted to the side of the colonists. They have some grave problems to lay before their townsmen before they depart into this wilderness of Wollomonopoag. The selectmen of Dedham, therefore, call a meeting of the proprietors of the town, 12th January, 1662, to hear these propositions. The prospective colonists say, through their committee, Anthony Fislier, Robert Ware, Richard Ellis, and Isaac Bullard, that they have secured but 12 HISTORY OF FRANKLIN. ten men, and they cannot go with so small a company — " they are not desirous to leave the world altogether," as they put it, but will go if they can " proceed in a safe way." For their justification, be it said, it was not Indians, nor solitude, nor hard work in a wilderness which they were afraid of, but a jeopardy of their legal rights and privileges of citizenship. They were not willing to enter into the wolf's den without good assurance that responsible hands were hold of the other end of the rope and would keep hold of it. The town of Dedham, they knew, had at a general town meeting already approved the setting up of a plantation at Wollomonopoag, and had sent two men to inquire of the Indi- ans about their title. But what will the proprietors of Ded- ham do about it? for these were two different parties. Will they make the way safe by paying the Indians and giving the lands to the venturing settlers ? The proprietors, and not the town, you remember, owned the lands not already granted to individual settlers or set apart for public use, and they, and not the town, must sell and give the title of their 600 acres to their hesitating colonists. I have not time now to report the discussion of this grave problem in that proprietors' meet- ing of 1662. But the conclusion, at a second meeting in the next month, 2d March, 1663, was that the proprietors could not advise the settlement in the present circumstances, but would satisfy for the necessary expense of those who had broken ground at Wollomonopoag. So the project seems to be exploded. But Timothy Dwight and Richard Ellis, the two agents chosen two years before, in 1660, to confer with the Indians, have, meanwhile, been busy in dealing with the wily Wompanoags, and now, in 1662, bring to the proprietors a re- port which gives a new aspect to the problem. Philip has this year succeeded, through the death of his father Masassoit and elder brother Alexander, to the headship of the tribe of the Wampanoags, and, perhaps to collect the means for his projected war upon the settlements, is ready to conclude the long negotiations for his lands. By the aid of Capt. Thomas Willett,one of the Plymouth commissioners, long HISTORICAL ADDRESS. 13 skilled in Indian tactics — afterwards the first mayor of New York city, and whose grave lies on the banks of Bullosk's Cove in Seekonk — the Dedham agents have purchased and secured a deed of Wollomonopoag, five miles square (six says Worthing- ton) for £24 10s., which sum Captain Willett has advanced for the town out of his own pocket. This money must be repaid to the generous captain and the newly-bought land must supply the means of payment. The proprietors, therefore, at this same meeting of March, 1663, vote a general dividend among themselves, both of the 600 acres set apart for a settlement and of its price of ,£160, one-quarter to be paid annually. This land and its cost is to be divided according to each one's cow-common rights. There are thirty-four shares of the 600 acres and of the £160. These cow-common rights, so often mentioned, may require an explanation. The territory belonged to the proprietors as a company, in which each held shares in proportion to his property valuation. The ratio was one common right per each £8 of estate. The number of acres set apart for pasturage was in proportion to the number and needs of the cattle owned by the proprietors, five sheep being reckoned equal to one cow, and each owned such a share of this land, or so many cow-common rights, as one-eighth of his property valua- tion might express in units. The whole grant or township was held by the proprietors in a similar manner, and when five-acre, eight-acre divisions, etc., were subsequently granted by the proprietors, each drew five, ten, or fifteen acres of the common land, as the number of his common rights might be. For many years the business of proprietors and of inhabitants were transacted in common, but a colonial law in 1720 organ- ized the proprietary as a separate body from the town, and their acts disappear from the municipal records and mostly from our present knowledge. Those who have already made improvements at Wollomono- poag are allowed first to choose their lots. I count nine men, and these were presumably the first comers to Wollomonopoag to settle. You may recognize among them your grandfather's 14 HISTORY OF FRANKLIN. grandfatlier : Anthony Fisher, Jr., Sargt. Richard Ellis, Robert Ware, James Thorp, Isaac BuUard, Sanil Fisher, Sam'l Parker, Josh. Kent, and Job Farrington. Good Franklin names, most of them. To them are to be added Sam'l Sheers (the first actnal settler apparently), Ralph Freeman, and perhaps Daniel Makiah. Where these men located their lots it is not possible now accnrately to determine. Bnt the record says the first lot was " to be where the Indians have broken np land not far from the place intended to bnild a mill at," which was where the Eagle Factory now stands.* Perhaps the remaining thirty- three lots went southwards to the meeting-house, and thence westward along the two present main streets of Wrentham. It is now 1662, and the owners of the thirty-four lots enter one after another, either in person or by proxy, upon the occu- pation of their territory. In the next year, 1663, they lay out their first highway, with the sanction of the selectmen of Ded- ham, " at the east end of their lots." Was it the road from the present meeting-house of Wrentham towards Franklin ? The five succeeding years are laboriously spent in taming the native forests for fields of corn and rye, building their log- houses, fencing in their pastures and watching the wolves. We hear nothing from them but the echo of their axes against the big trees until 1668, when the irrepressible Indian reappears. It is a woman this time. What is her grievance we do not know ; but her absence is more desirable than her presence, and she herself thinks so, for at a town meeting in Dedliam, "where their affairs are still conducted, 4th February, 1668, Sarah herself is present with her son John and her brother George, and requests that her little farm of ten acres among the white men may be exchanged for a tract elsewhere. The proposal is ac- cepted, and they give her ten acres of upland in exchange, with liberty to take fencing stuff, " near a pond about two miles westward from the situation of the township at Wollo- * Sucli is tlie current interpretation; but Hon. Ezra Wilkinson, in his explo- rations of ancient deeds, lias concluded that this first lot was on South street, and that this was the first street laid out in the present Wrentham. HISTORICAL ADDRESS. 15 monopouge." From some previous allusions to George Indian, we suppose the ten acres quitted by Sarah were near the Eagle mill, and as there is no other pond "two miles westward" than the present Uncas pond in Franklin — on whose banks the almshouse farm now is — who knows but the Indian Sarah and her son John and brother George were the first occupants of our poor farm, and prophets of the Indians' coming fate ! But they are hardly removed to their new quarters when the irrepressible Philip reappears. At least, a messenger hurriedly comes to Dedham to say that Philip is at Wollomonopoag with more lands which he is anxious to sell. It is doubtful to the Dedhamites what claim further he has ; but, as he is a neigh- bor not politic to provoke in these ticklish times, Timothy Dwight and four others are hurried off to buy up whatever lands he may have to offer, " provided he can show that he has any." Suspicious that the six miles square he had sold did not cover the space between Dedham and the western line of Wollomonopoag, as he well might be, he claims a new-moon- shaped lot on its eastern side, including part of the present Walpole and up to the lands of Chickatabut, sachem of the Neponsets of Sharon, etc. This tract is also purchased, as near as we can ascertain, for £11 8d., and is accepted by the town of Dedham, 15th November, 1669. Before Dedham has done with these dusky peddlers of real estate it pays out at least £66 18s. for seven different purchases within its boundaries, and has seven different Indian deeds, which are connnitted to Dea. Aldis to be kept for the town in a box. But it came to pass in process of time that the deacon's children wanted the box for other uses, and the deeds, like so many other now in- valuable documents, went where other like precious papers have gone, and are going yet, for want of some vigilant interest and care. But our fathers honestly paid the price asked by the Indian claimants for their lands, and with somewhat better than the traditional peck of beans, at which nearly all towns are reported to have been bought ; so that they cannot be justly charged with wronging the natives of their soil. These 16 HISTORY OF FRANKLIN. farms are held by equitable purcliase of tlic only occupants who could justify any claim. With the lands in their possession by grant of the General Court and by purchase from both the natives and the proprie- tors of Dedham, nothing hinders our transferring ourselves to the young settlement, not yet named, at Wollomonopoag. Even "svhile signs have been thickening along the southern horizon, and among the Wampanoags especially, portending a disturbance to these pioneers, they have been pushing on their young enterprise. They adopt rules for the due management of their plantation, among which are — that each proprietor shall pay one shilling and sixpence per common right for the main- tenance of a minister ; that the choice of a minister shall be long to the inhabitants with the concurrence of the Dedham proprietors who can be easily consulted, and especially of the Dedham minister. Rev. John Allin, the ruling Elder, John Hunting, Eleazer Lusher, the head man in civil affairs ; and that a tax of two shillings per common right be paid towards a convenient meeting-house, of which John Thurston, Robert Ware, and Sargent Fuller are to be the building committee. The ministerial candidate seems to have been already selected, for within twenty-five days, 27th December, 1669, Mr. Samuel Man is invited and the choice approved by the Dedham ad- visers. But the hindrances to his acceptance are many, and time slips along for three years and more, so filled with other most urgent business, not the least of which is watching the Wampanoags, before the full arrangements are completed. Mr. Man's answer, in the lltli month of 1672, that he accepts their propositions " in case they be performed within the space of a year and a half," hints at some dilatoriness possible on the part of the settlers. But they are hurrying as fast, no doubt, as those rugged times will permit. Anxious, may be, to secure this young Harvard graduate, within a year after his call, a petition for incorporation as a town is presented to the General Court, and is, with astonishing promptness, granted on the same day, l6th October, 1673 ; and that too, when, on HISTORICAL ADDRESS. 17 Rev. Mr. Bean's testimony, there are only sixteen families in the settlement.* But while these few families are getting themselves into comfortable order, building a grist-mill, securing a blacksmith, etc., the conspiracy of Philip is also ripening, and within three years his bands of warriors dash upon the frontier towns all along the line from Swansey to Hadley. At first their ravages are at the south and along the Connecticut valley. But the smoke of their presence draws nearer and nearer. Hardly have the flames died down in Lancaster before the sky over Medfield is thick with smoke. Wrentham lies next in their path, and only ten days, from the 10th to the 21st of February, 1675, 0. S., between the burning of Lancaster and Medfield ! In a week the Indians will be here. Speedily are the goods packed and sent with the wives and children back to Dedham, and by 30th March the deserted houses are left to their fate. A band of the Xarragansetts, returning from Medfield, set fire to the empty dwellings and burn, tradition says, all but two. It was a vengeful act, perhaps in response to an unexpected encounter which they had met with at Indian Rock, less than five hundred rods from this spot. The traditions of this encounter vary, but the essential facts are that a man named Rocket, in search of a horse lost in the woods, found instead a trail of forty-two Indians, which he cautiously followed until night, when he saw them fairly laid down to sleep. He hastened back to the settlement, mustered a dozen resolute men under Capt. Robert (?) Ware, and before daylight the little band was posted within eyesight of the sleeping savages and ready to salute them as soon as they awaked. It was a sharp and anxious watch, for the Indians were more than two to one of the Wrenthamites. Between daylight and sunrise the Indians arose almost together, when, at a preconcerted signal, each waiting musket sent its bullet to its mark. The suddenness of the attack so confused the *But the records of the General Court show the incorporation to have been consummated upon the 17th. See records, Vol. iv., pt. ii., p. 569. 18 HISTORY OF FRANKLIN. Indians who escaped the first shot that they rushed and leajxjd down a steep precipice of the rock ; where they, maimed and lamed by the fall, became speedily victims to the quick and steady aim of the whites. One or two only escaped to tell the fate of their comrades. Rocket is said to have received an annual pension from the General Court for his prompt and skillful action. In 1823, the Fourth of July was celebrated on Indian Rock, by an oration from Dr. John G. Metcalf, a dinner, etc., when earnest talk was had of some commemorative monument on the spot. But a visit there a few days ago showed me only the names of the originators of that celebration deeply engraven in the rock and distinctly legible after over fifty years of frosts and storms : " W. Levering, D. C. Fisher, H. N. Gridley, J. G. Metcalf, W. B. \Yright." These are flanked here and there by half a score of initials of later dates. But Indian Rock still lifts itself its own monument, solitary as ever, above the trees, and gives the visitor one of the finest views, from the Milton Hills to Wachusett, which this town affords. Pity that the path which once led to it were not again made passable, for few jaunts would be more pleasurable and so near the village. But we must hasten after the departed colonists. Many are the meetings and discussions held u})on the question of return, pivoting mostly upon the number willing to go back with them, and especially upon the company of their young minister, Mr. Man, not yet settled over them. Meanwhile they keep up their organization and choose their officers annually while these questions are settling. The spirit in which they dis- cussed the position of their affairs finds illustration in their answer to the vote of the proprietors that they rebuild again. It is dated 8th January, 1677 : — We whose names are beneath subscribed having formerly had our recidance in Wollomonopouge but by thos sad and soUame dispensations of God's providences were Removed, yet desire a Work for the Honnour of God and the Good and comfort of ourselves and ours might be again Ingaged and Promotted att that place : Therefore our purpose is to returne HISTORICAL ADDRESS. 19 thither God willing — But knowing our owne Inability for so Great and Waytie a worke, both in Respecte of our Insuffi- ciency for the carrying on of new plantation worke, and the dangers that may yett be reanewed upon us by the heathen breaking out on us ; thinke it not safe for us to returne alone except other of the proprietors joyne to Go up along with us or Send Inhabitants to ingage in that worke with us. Subscribed by Elezeare Metcalf, William Macknah, Samuel Man, Daniels Hawes, Elizear Gay, Cornelius Fisher, Daniels Wight, John Payne, Joseph Kingsbury, Kobert Ware, Benjamin Kockett, John Ware, John Aldis, Nath Ware, Michell Willson, Samuel Fisher, James Mossman, Samuelle Sheers. As a result of this vote we find them returned to Wrent- ham and so far re-established as to hold a general meeting in their rebuilt meeting-house in 1685, at which date a lot of from twenty t© twenty-five acres is granted for a school, and leave is given to several persons to put in a gallery into the meeting-house. We infer that the children have grown somewhat large and saucy, too, from living in Dedham, for two men had al- ready, in 1684, been chosen to keep the boys from playing on the Sabbath " in time of exercise." They send also a peti- tion to the General Court for permission to choose their own selectmen, like other towns, and to manage their own affairs without consulting the court's committee — the latter, they say, being now difficult to get at, and besides, in their plain language, crazy and infirm in body. This petition is granted, and also a committee is ordered to lay a road between Wrent- liam and Medfield. This road is that now crossing Charles river at Rockville in East Medway, and along which road the Medfield people spread themselves into Franklin and became the earliest settlers of its territory. But there is not time now to tell the several steps by which the little child in this wilderness of Wollomonopoag gradu- ally learned to walk. How John Woodcock had a bit of land given him close to the yet unplastered and unshingled meet- ing-house to put up a small refreshment-house for Sabbath 20 HISTORY OF FRANKLIN. day; how two watchmen, according to the colonial law, walk every night each half a mile east and west from the meeting-liouse to challenge stragglers and bring them before the magistrate next morning for explanation ; of the watch- house to be built in 1695, or of the school-house, " so big as y' y'' may be a room of sixteen feet square beside convenient room for a chimney, where the selectmen will keep school in turn per week, to teach children and youth to read English and Wright and cypher gratis, and begin, God willing, next Monday ; " how town meetings are called to be held at 6 o'clock in the morning, and that, too, in March ; and how Dorchester people, i. e. Foxboro, are by vote allowed to at- tend meeting, if they will " pay like the rest." But the ministerial history claims a paragraph, for the Christian life of our ancestry was an element in it for more than fifty years. Although Wollomonopoag was incorporated 17th October, 1673, as the town of AYrentham, so named from the old town in England whence some of the families came, and although Samuel Man had been called the year before, yet for the troublous times and divers hindrances, a church had not been gathered nor Mr. Man settled until April 13, 1692, when ten members, including the minister, were covenanted together.* Mr. Man was son of William and Mary (larsard) Man, of Cambridge, born 6tli July, 1647 ; H. U. 1665, married Esther Ware, of Dedham, May 17, 1698, by whom he had seven sons and four daughters, and died May 22, 1719, in the forty-ninth year of his ministry. Within seven months Rev. Henry Messenger was settled, Dec. 5, 1719. Two years after, in 1721, a new and larger house replaced the first sanctuary, to which the fathers of this town resorted until their separation in 1737 into a dis- tinct precinct for religious purposes." * They were Samuel Man (master elect), John "Ware, John Guild, Benjamin Rockwood, Thomas Thurston, John Fairbank, John Fales, Eleazer Metcalf, Ephraim Pond, Samuel Fisher (first deacon). HISTORICAL ADDRESS. 21 Mr. Messenger was born in Boston, 28th February, 1695, graduated at Harvard College 1719, and married 6th Janu- ary, 1720, Esther, daughter of Israel and Bridget Cheever, of Cambridge. He had seven sons and five daughters, four of whom became the wives of ministers. He was the second son of Thomas and Elizabeth Messenger, and grandson of Henry and Sarah Messenger from England, in 1640. He died 30th March, 1750, in the thirty-second year of his min- istry. The town meanwhile has increased so steadily that in 1718 it is divided into four districts, and a school is kept three months in each, under a committee of three for each part — north, east, south and west, and in ten years thereafter the old school-house with its chimney is voted to be sold at auc- tion. In 1719 thirteen Wrentham families are set off by the General Court to Bellingham, which begets a protest and lawsuit over the town line. It begets, also, another move- ment of greater interest to us. For the overflow from Boggestow, or Med field, across the Charles river has been moving on until nineteen families — " who live remote from the Public Worship and cannot attend on the same without difficulties and hardships," petition that a separate account may be kept of what every person pays towards the new meeting-house in Wrentham proper, so that it may be repaid to them whenever they shall be set off into a precinct or parish, for building a meeting-house for themselves. With this petition granted, March 13, 1720, 0. S., as an anchor to the windward, shrewdly dropped when a new minister and untested is being settled, the western side of the town quietly wait and watch for five years longer. But, that this anchor may not drag for want of holding ground, tliey secure a grant of sixty acres to be laid out of the common lands in two par- cels, " in the most convenient place for these people." Some of the less patient spirits — John Pond and twelve others — getting uneasy, petition in 1725 to be set off to Medway. Wrentham shakes its head. Whereupon Capt. Robert Pond and twenty others ask that a new precinct next to Belling- 22 HISTORY OF FRANKLIN. ham and Charles river, six and a half miles by four and a half, may be erected. This, too, is refused ; but there is evi- dently some propriety in the request, for the town, at its next meeting, Sept. 21, 1725, choose a " committee to give in rea- sons why the petition of the west part to be set off should not be granted." In 1728, John Pond, Jr., and thirteen others reurge his father's request to go to Med way. It will not be allowed yet, and there is quiet waiting again for six years more. In 1734, the westerly side moves in another direction. It asks, modestly, if a town's committee^may not come and " state the place for the building of the meeting-house where the petitioners have agreed for the building of said meeting- house, being about seventy-three rods southwest from the house of Michal Willson ? " Nay ! Then they ask, Will the town build a meeting-house there, and finish it at the town's cost ? Nay ! much louder. Well, then, will the town pro- vide the west side with preaching four months in the winter season this present year ? Thinking of the long rides " of seven, eight, and nine miles," from River End and the City Mills in the New England snow^s for their western brethren, the town does give a reluctant yes, and " the selectmen agree with Mr. Jacob Bacon to preach four months in the westerly part of the town, to begin the second Sabbath in December, and also to keep school three months from the 1st of January for £42"— £34 for the preaching, and £8 for the school.* A similar arrangement for the next winter's preaching of 1735-6 is made with Mr. Hezekiah Man.f * Mr. Bacon was the son of Thomas, grandson of John, and great-grandson of Michal of Dedham, 1640, who came from Ireland with a wife and four chil- dren, and died 1648. Jacob was born in Wrentham 9th September, 1706, gradu- ated at Cambridge, 1731, and settled first minister in Keene, N. H., 18th Octo- ber, 1738; dismissed in April, 1747, when the settlement was broken up by the Indians, and again settled over the third church, Plymouth, Mass., in 1749, and dismissed in 1776. He preached a year and a half in Carver, and then removed to Rowley, where he died, June, 1787, in his eighty-first year. t Mr. Man was born 27th October, 1707, son of William, grandson of Rev. Samuel Man, the first minister of Wrentham. He graduated at Cambridge, 1731, in the same class with Mr. Bacon, and died before ordination, in 1739. HISTORICAL ADDRESS. 23 Still this compromise of a third part of a minister does not satisfy the west side. Perhaps a politic move may quiet it and, 11th March, 1735, the town vigorously sets off to Med- way the still persistent John Pond, Jr., and his uneasy neigh- bors, Thomas Bacon, Jr., Samuel Pond, Richard Puffer, Joseph Ellis, Peter Adams, Samuel Fisher, and James Ellis, Jr. But the remnant, resolute as ever, next year, in May, 1736, renew their petition for a separation ; to be again refused. The town, in August, declined even to give reasons to the General Court for their negative. Nor will they, in September, remit the west side from their ministerial taxes. But in December they are willing to argue the question by a com- mittee before the General Court, to which the w^est side have already applied in June, 1736, for a parish, or precinct charter, through Capt. Robert Pond, Eleazer Metcalf, and forty-six others. Such a growing list of names brings matters to a crisis. The General Court sends out a committee to view the premises, who approve of the separation in general, but refer the way and manner thereof to the agreement of the two sections in- terested. The town is to answer the petition at the next court session, and, therefore, a general meeting is called for Aug. 29, 1737, at which, after sundry complimentary where- ases, a consent is voted ; with the condition, however, that they move the dividing line " half a mile and forty rods " (so exact were they) further westwards. In due course of legis- lative action, the end is reached by the signature of Governor Belcher, Dec. 23, 1737, and the second precinct of Wrentham assumes legal existence. Like a cutting from the parent bulb, this dependency grows, in forty years, into the town of Franklin. The process by which the town thus severed its northern half into a precinct may not be uninteresting. The record says : — Whereas, Capt. Robert Pond, Eleazer Metcalf and forty- six others inhabitants of the western part of Wrentham pre- ferred a petition to the great and General Court in June A. D. 1736 setting forth that they have preferred a petition (as 24 HISTORY OF FRANKLIN. above) praying that they may either be set off a separate township by the bounds following (the present town bounda- ries nearly); and whereas the Honorable Committee appointed by the General Court in last December, were ordered to re- pair to the westerly part of Wrentham and view the situation of the same and consider the circumstances of the petitioners and hear the parties concerned, did not report in favor of the prayer of the petitioners but were of oppinion that they should be relieved from under their hardships and difficulties they complain of in another way and manner than they prayed for in their petition Unless the inhabitants of the town of Wrent- ham should agree upon a method among themselves for the relief of their Westerly inhabitants and report the same to the General Court at such time as said Court should appoint therefor ; and whereas, the inhabitants of this town are this day assembled in a public town meeting appointed by the selectmen agreeable to the order of the General Court to know the mind of the town by a vote, what method they will agree upon to accommodate the Westerly inhabitants who preferred a petition to the said Court in June, 1736, setting forth the great difficulties, etc., the consideration whereof being recom- mended to this town by the said Court ; — And although it doth not appear to this town by any petition to the Court or town from the said jjctitioners that they desire any relief from their difficulties and hardships in any other way or manner than their heing set off a separate township, which the town has denied them and given in their reasons to the General Court, yet notwithstanding the inhabitants being desirous it may appear that they are willing to come into some method agreeable to reason and justice, and as far as they are able under their present poor circumstances to accommodate the said petitioners and relieve them under the hardships and dif- ficulties they complain of in their petition, although no proper steps be taken by the said petitioners on application made to the town therefor ; and whereas the Court ordered the Com- mittee's report to the first Tuesday of next fall sessions that so the town of Wrentham may have opportunity to accommo- date the matter among themselves : — Wherefore voted that it is the mind of the town that all the said petitioners with their estates, that are of that mind and all such other inhal)itants of this town with their estates as shall join with them living and lying within the bounds and limits following, viz. : four miles upon the Charles river from the North end of the line between Wrentham and Bellingham, HISTORICAL ADDRESS. 25 and at the end of the said four miles to run a straight line to the middle of the length of the line between Wrentham and Attleboro for their East bounds, and half the length of the line between Wrentham and Attleboro to be their South bounds ; the line between Wrentham and Bellingham to be their West bounds ; and Charles river to be their North bounds ; be a separate Parish l)y themselves, and that they have leave to call and settle a minister among themselves and be discharged from paying any ministerial charges to the support of the ministry in the other part of the town so long as they main- tain preaching among themselves. Secondly, Or that all the petitioners within the bounds petitioned for by the said petitioners be a separate parish, etc., provided their Easterly bounds mentioned in their petition be set half a mile and 40 rods further westward nearer the line between Wrentham and Bellingham. The petitioners thus set off were — Eleazer Fisher, Simon Slocum, James New, Uriah Wilson, Edward Hall, Nathl. Fisher, Saml. Partridge, Daniel Maccane, Barucli Pond, Nathl. Fairbanks, Jonathan Wright, Benjamin Kockwood, John Richardson, Job Partridge, Thomas Rockwood, Robert Blake, John Fisher, David Lawrence, Jr., Eleazer Ware, Eleazer Metcalf, Jr., Ebenezer Lawrence, Michael Metcalf, Ebenezer Hunting, Daniel Haws, Edward Gay, Ichabod Pond, Nathl. Haws, David Jones, Leneard Fisher, Ebenr. Clark, David Lawrence, David Darling. Jr. John Adams, David Pond, John Failes, Saml. Morse, Daniel Thurston, Michael Wilson, Ezra Pond, Saml. Metcalf, Ebenr. Sheckelworth, Ebenr. Partridge, Thomas Man, Sen., John Smith, Robert Pond, Eleazer Metcalf, Josiah Haws, Joseph Whitng, Total, 48. The first warrant to organize the new precinct is issued by- Jonathan Ware, Justice of the Peace, and is addressed to Robert Pond, Daniel Haws, David Jones, Daniel Thurston, and John Adams, five of the freeholders. They are called to meet " at the house the inhabitants usually meet in for public worship " on the 16th of January, 1737-8, at 12 o'clock. When they came together they found everything to be done anew. No church, no minister, no meeting-house ! They chose the necessary officers and adjourned four days for meditation. At the next meeting they go resolutely at their work. They vote X80 for preaching, and a committee to 26 HISTORY OF FRANKLIN. secure it; another committee to provide materials for a meeting-house in place of the small building heretofore pro- vided and used, to be forty feet long, thirty-one feet wide and twenty feet posts, towards which each may contribute his proportion ; and especially sent a request to Wrentham for that money previously paid towards its meeting-house, and which they had sagaciously, by a vote ten years before, se- cured to be repaid to them whenever they should need it for a like use. It amounted to £130 lis. The request was at first refused, but four months after granted. Meanwhile the steps for a church existence are going on. Some twenty brethren having secured letters from the mother church, the 16th of February, 1738, is kept " as a day of solemn fasting and prayer — to implore the blessing of God and His direction in the settling of a church and in order to the calling and settling of a gospel minister in said place." And there, in a large assembly the covenant is read and ac- cepted, and Rev. Mr. Baxter of Medfield, moderator, pro- nounces them a duly organized church of our Lord Jesus Christ." * Two other ministers are present, doubtless Mr. Messenger of Wrentham ; and Mr. Bucknam of Medway, as being both fraternally interested in the new church. These three ministers being questioned then and there by a com- mittee of the church, cordially commend Mr. Elias Haven, who has for a considerable time preached in the precinct, " as in some good measure qualified for the gospel ministry." The parish proceed immediately (March 23d) to choose Mr. Haven as their minister; which they do unanimously, " sixty- one yeas and not one scattering vote," with a salary of six score pounds annually by the 1st of March, old tenor, and " to rise and fall as the credit of money rises and falls from what it is this day," also with a glebe of sixty acres and X60 with it, or, if he prefer, £200 instead, for a settlement. The church at the same time agrees and formally extends a call on the 25th of August following. * For a copy of this covenant, see the Manual of the First Congregational Church of Franklin. HISTORICAL ADDRESS. 27 On Nov. 8, 1738, a council gathers for the installation. The churches invited are in Hopkinton,Wrentham, Medfield, Leicester, Uxbridge, and the old and new north churches in Boston. The audience assembles near the public meeting- house — not yet finished — and before the sun sets Rev. Elias Haven has become the first pastor of this new church. After nearly sixteen years of labor, often interrupted for months by sickness, he finally closed his painful and long wrestle with consumption Aug. 10, 1754, at forty years of age, and now rests in the old cemetery, where a still remem- bering town, by vote Nov. 2, 1795, forty years after his death, ordered gravestones to be set up, " the bigness of the stones with the inscription thereon to be left discretionary with a special committee." * The stones still stand, large and thick slate, and may be legible for another century. This long interval of forty years since Mr. Haven's death does not im- ply that his grave, had been all the while left without a monu- ment. But the burial-lot had received several fits of atten- tion, clearings, fencings, etc., and a late revision of it may have suggested that their first pastor had not been honored with sufficient distinction. Next to the pastor in a town is the meeting-house where his motive power is applied to the community. We must not, in our hasty ramble through the century, pass by the first meeting-house of Franklin. The building of its meeting- house is always a great event in a town, and an occasion of original projects, of vigorous debates and shrewd financier- ing. The first topic of discussion is a site. In 1734, the precinct had so far proceeded as to ask Wrentham to come over and look at the place they have pitched upon among themselves for a meeting-house " about seventy-three rods southwest from the house of Michael Willson." He lived where the old house once occupied by William Phipps stands. They had a committee in 1737 to secure materials, and Mr. Thomas Man had offered to give an acre of land to set the house on. They are now getting in a hurry, for the preacher *See Ecclesiastical History, Addenda. 28 HISTORY OF FRANKLIN. has been selected, and how can he preach without an audience- room ! It is the 7th of April, 1738. Five men are sent into a cor- ner " to Debate and Consider and Perfix upon a place for Bouilding a Meeting House on and Bring it to the Precinct in one hour." Meanwhile, the rest spend that hour in vot- ing and unvoting, until they reach an apparent finality, to set the house " at the most convenientest place on that acre of Land That was laid out By Thomas Man for the use of the West Inhabitants in said Precinct." But who shall decide where this " most convenientest place " is ? Mr. Plimpton, " survair " of Medfield, is selected to bring his implements to bear on the solution ; who reports for the west corner of Man's lot, " as near as they conveniently can." But next year. May 9, 1739, a new question arises, whether this be in the exact center of the precinct, and a new surveyor is called to tJiis problem. He and his two chainmen are put under oath to honestly survey the ground where the meeting-house must shortly lie. May 23 he reports in writing as follows : — To the Inhabitants of Wrentham Westerly Precinct, Gent' : These may Inform you that I the Subscriber Have Been and Measured to find the Center of s"* Precinct, Mess\ Decon Barber and Benj. Rock wood being chainmen, and ac- cording to what we find by Measuring on the Ground from the Northerly End to the Southerly End, and from the West- erly Side to the Eastel'I^^^cl^ of the Same I find the Center of s Measuring to be South westerly from the Present Meet- ing house a little Beter then an Hundred Rods, where we Pitched a Stake and Made an heap of Stones. Eleazer Fisher, Surveyor. He was of Dedham, the chainmen were of Medway. This central pivot of the whole parish having been scien- tifically determined, which is said to have been in the middle of Darius Morse's mud-pond, at a cost of <£11 2s., they order the committee to " hire workmen instantly, and raise, cover, inclose, and glaze the meeting-house, lay the lower floor and cover with boards and shingles," and vote £200 towards the HISTORICAL ADDRESS. 29 cost. This summer of 1739 sees the barn-like building arise, and in September another committee are putting in the seats according to the timber provided, and " one lock and key, and bolts and latches for the doors and cants " for the gallery stairs, and also foundation for the pulpit and the pulpit stairs, and rails round the galleries and make five "pillows," — a small number for a modern audience. The bills, presented 3d March, 1740, show that the committees had been reasonably expeditious. The final cost was £338 13s. 6d., as reported in October, 1741. The boys, too, were promptly at work, for in July, 1740, Captain Fairbanks is directed to get the win- dows mended and to prosecute the depredators. Pari passu with tlie meeting-house arose the horse houses, whose long strings of successors afterwards made the Frank- lin Common so famous. They were all planted and grew on Thomas Man's acre. Among them were Richard Puffer's " small diner house," and Isaac Heton and Dr. Jones had a "small noon house." With the sanctuary finished — with a pew on each side of the pulpit, a deacon's seat in front and long benches filling the rest of the house — next comes the ticklish question of seating the audience. Gravely a special committee count the years and measure the tax-bills of the fathers, and so as- sign their places " according to age and estate," as they were instructed. Some wish to build pews at their own ex- pense, but the precinct resolutely refuses assent. The place and not the kind of seat is sufficient graduation ; for the straight bench is the throne of democracy. Of this oldest real meeting-house no sketch, or picture, or ideal survives, save that I remember to have seen some of its windoivs in an old house. The sashes were two feet square, with five-inch panes of glass set diagonally in lead, as the fash- ion then was. The meeting-house stood on the slight hill north of the present Catholic church, in a surrounding girth of pitch pines. It was guarded by platoons of horse-sheds and small dinner-houses, where the forefathers of the hamlet 30 HISTORY OF FRANKLIN. shared their lunch and the mothers nursed their infants in the hour's intermission of the Sabbatli noons. This house was subjected to occasional modifications as the congregation increased and the taste changed. The ob- jection to pews yielded gradually. In 1755, Capt. John Goldsbury is allowed " to build a small pew joining to the pew left of the pulpit, at his own charge," and it is liked so well that in March following they vote to alter the meeting- house generally, building seats along the front of the galle- ries, convenient for men to sit on, and also hind seats in the galleries. The seats under the galleries are converted into pew-lots, and " such men as it may fall to by lot in order of age and estate may build there if they will, provided if they leave town the pew shall revert to the precinct." The meet- ing-house, however, is gradually aging in spite of repairs and frequent mendings of broken windows. But Michael Willson, the first sexton, keeps it as tidily as he can until Uriah Will- son (his son) takes the broom, with occasional respite from Joshua Daniels, Jonathan Archer, and Elisha Partridge, un- til the ancient sanctuary is left to sleep undisturbed in its dust on its little hill. For the precinct, getting ready now to emerge into a township, begins to plan about the freedom- suit of a new meeting-house to wear on assuming its coming dignity of a town. But before we quite leave the old sanctuary, we must step within long enough to listen to what was called the old way of singing. We take up one of the few books — an " Old Bay Psalm book," which has been used since 1640 in all the churches in the colon3^ The eight tunes at the end are from Ravenscroft's collection of 1618. The chorister starts the tune with his pitch pipe. The congregation follow, each in his own fashion and at his own pace, according to the old style in which his grandmother sang the tune in Wrentham or Dedham half a century ago. All sing the same part with an energy begotten of facing northeasters and felling forest trees and driving strings of oxen among their stumps. No two persons sing alike, and the singing consequently sounds, HISTORICAL ADDRESS. 31 as Rev. Thomas Walter said, " like five hundred different tiines roared out at the same time."* In one sense it is like the voice of many waters, and this is called the old way of singing. It had already become a grievance to tlie ministers who wished to make melody in their hearts unto the Lord, and strenuous efforts had been begun to bring the people back to some harmony of voice, as well as of sentiment. Hence we appreciate this emphatic vote of the precinct June 26, 1738, immediately after the gathering of the young church, viz. : — " To sing no other tunes than are Pricked Down in our for- mer Psalm Books wliich were Printed between Thirty and forty years Agoe, and To Sing Them as They are Prickt down in them as Near as they can." This was a Precinct blow at the old way of singing. The older people remon- strated ; but the Precinct refused, in September, " to ease those that were inclined to sing the old way." The church, March 8, 1738-9, voted not to sing in the old w^ay, but by rule, i. e., according to note ; and they chose Josepli Whiting to set the tune in the church. This action of the churcli, so curiously put in the negative form, has a key to its signifi- cance in a solemn query raised, the record says, " toward the close" of the meeting. As it proved the seed of a large and slow harvest it claims mention. The query is, "to see what notice the churcli will take of one of the brethren's strikins; into a pitch of the tune unusually raised February 18th." After considerable consultation, the record says, and there well might be, for it was like the spot of Paul's shipwreck, the place where two seas met, it was voted : — Whereas, our brother David Pond, as several of our brethren, viz.: David Jones, Ebenezer Hunting, Benjamin Rockwood, Jr., Aaron Haws, and Michael Metcalf apprehend, struck into a pitch of the tune on February 18th, in the pub- lic worship in the forenoon, raised above what was set ; after most of the congregation, as is thouglit, kept the pitch for three lines, and after our pastor had desired them that had * Hood's History of Music in N. E., p. 84. 32 HISTORY OF FRANKLIN. raised it to fall to the pitch that was set to be suitable, decent, or to that purpose ; the question was put, whether the church apprehends this our brother David Pond's so do- ing to be disorderly ; and it passed in the affirmative, and David Pond is suspended until satisfaction is given. But David Pond was frozen over by this cooling of his high musical ardor, nor would he be thawed into any melting confession. Though the church sent the tender of a refer- ence, he would not meet them. They invite him to a special prayer meeting, but he will not bend. They Vote a solemn admonition. He proposes a council ; tliat declined he calls an ex-parte council, which is not acknowledged. Then he o-oes into the second church in Medway, which asks questions about his case and gets a distinct letter in reply, which is followed by a second and more emphatic about harboring malcontents, and a third, too, with replies from Medway — all unsatisfactory. At last, in September, 1751, over thir- teen years after that high pitching of the tune, the warmth of a continuous interest melts the icy barriers, and this Pond flows forth in a confession (12th January, 1751-2) and the Medway church joins in sundry acknowledgments (14th February, 1752), and thus the discord is brought down to concert pitch again and the hymn flows on. But those longings for singing the old way were not con- fined to one sturdy pro-advocate. The battlefield was staked out at once (May 18, 1739) by a vote of the church, " that the man that tunes the Psalm in the congregation be limited till further direction to some particular tunes, and the tunes limited are Canterbury, London, Windsor, St. David's, Cam- bridge, Short 100th and 148th Psalm tunes, and Benjamin Rock wood, Jr., to tune the Psalm." A movement, 30th of January, 1715, to enlarge this musical area was promptly re- pelled. They will have only a moderate new way, even though when Benjamin Rockwood cannot sing for the fail- ure of his voice, and they choose Jabez Fisher in his place, he declines because the catalogue of tunes is too short for him to enter among them. But this refusal begets thought; HISTORICAL ADDRESS. 83 and four years' practice has so worn out the eight permitted notes that (April 5, 1749) the church takes off the limitation. They also dismiss Joseph Whiting as chorister and put his pitch-pipe into the mouth of Barnabas Metcalf. With an un- limited range for tunes, the hymn now goes along like a flow- ing brook, and — " Chatters over stony ways In little sharps and trebles " for aught I know until this day. Meanwhile both church and precinct have another anxious care on hand. Their pastor's health has been failing, and with tender helpfulness they have eased his waning strength of pulpit labors by generous contributions, until his decease in 1744.* Now comes that most trying experience of hearing candidates to select a successor. For the modern expedient of a make-believe, acting pastor has not occurred to them, and they sit patiently down to hear and scrutinize whomever the precinct may bring before them. In succession come Aaron Putnam, Jason Haven, Stephen Holmes, Thomas Brooks, Mr. Norton, Joseph Manning whom they ask to stay, but he declines ; Messrs. Parsons, Goodhue, Phillips Payson, who declines their call ; Jesse Root, Nathan Holt, who will not tarry though invited ; John Eals, Mr. Gregory, and Caleb Barnam. He, the fourteenth, is besought by 102 votes to bring their uncertainty to an end, and ^133 settlement and X7o''salary are laid before him as a temptation. After some months of deliberation he accepts, and, June 4, 1760, the second minister of this precinct is settled by the elders and messengers of the churches in Danbury, Ct., the two in Medway, in Attleboro, Wrentham, Walpole, two in Mendon and Upton. * t? f The exercises were : Introductory prayer by Rev. A. i^rost, of Second Church, Mendon (now Milford) ; sermon by Rev. Phillips Payson, of Walpole ; installing prayer by Rev. Nathan Bucknam, of First Church, Medway; charge by Rev. Joseph * For further notice of Rev. Mr. Haven see Ecclesiastical History. 3 34 HISTORY OF FRANKLIN. Dorr, of Mendon ; right hand of fellowship by Rev. Joseph Bean, of Wrentham. The church had voted " to conduct themselves agreeable to the sentiments and advice of the Convention of Ministers of this Province in a paper printed June, 1759, for the Reformation of Disorders on the Days of Ordination of Min- isters." Mr. Barnam's pastorate lasted less than eight years. He was dismissed March 6, 1768, and was resettled in Taunton, whence he went as chaplain into the Continental army and died of the camp disease at Pittsfield, Aug. 23, 1776. But his brief pastorate in Franklin was full of incidents, debates and differences — not the least among them being the war of the hymn books. This may have arisen with the subsidence of the pastoral problem. But come it did even before the ordination, in the guise of two church votes April 15, 1760, first to sing Dr. Watts' version of the psalms, and second, " the pastor may not refuse to lead the church to vote as above mentioned." There is to be no Connecticut Consociationism in this church ; and to settle it they vote, " when any member wants to bring up a business which the pastor thinks improper, if he cannot satisfy the person, he 'sliall bring it to the church, and they shall decide whether to appoint a hearing." Such a vote indicates that the sides are forming for a fight over the new hymn book. As nearly as we can read the banners in the smoke of the conflict, there are three parties in the field — Old Bay psalm book, Tate and Brady's version, and Dr. Watt's ver- sion. Between them the conflict wavers with varying sign. Dec. 10, 1761, the church vote to " sing Tate and Brady's ver- sion, together with the hymns bound in the same volume, till 1st of March next." (This was the new edition of 1741). April 28, this time is prolonged indefinitely. But on the 2l8t of June comes this volley from the parish : — Voted, that the parish make use of that version of the psalms in their public worship on the Lord's day and at other HISTORICAL ADDRESS. 36 times as occasion shall require (no surreptitious uses), which was made use of in this place, before the Rev. Mr. Barnam had liis invitation to settle with this people ; commonly called the old version of the psalms composed for the use and ben- efit of the congregations of New England. The clerk is instructed to wait upon Mr. Barnam with this vote, desiring that he will adhere to and conform with it. Nine days after, June 30, the church replies by a vote to give the parish the choice of Watts, Tate and Brady, or a council. September 6, the parish refuses eitlier. Nov. 28, 1763, about a jear after this refusal, the church sends, as a flag of truce, the acceptance of a council to sit on this edge of dispute, com- posed of the Medway first, Wrentham and Mendon second churches, if the parish will pay the expenses ; which the par- ish accepts December 26, with this sharp definition of the points in arbitration — whether to sing Dr. Watts' version of the psalms, or Tate and Brady's version, together witli the hymns bound with them. The Old Bay psalm book appears to have withdrawn, disabled, from the field. April 17, 1764, the council meets, in which the two churches in Medway, in Walpole, Sutton, Wrentham and Milford are represented by six pastors and ten delegates ; which council after sharp re- proof s to each side, advises them to sing the version of Dr. Watts in part, together with our New England version in part. Thus the hymn books are relegated to the arena to en- dure the working of the law of " the survival of the fittest." The church muses upon this result from April until No- vember, and then asks the council to come together again and -explain their meaning. They re-meet in June, expound, and tJic church accepts the exposition on the 4th of July, 1765, by a vote of forty-eight to fifteen, just eleven years before the Declaration of our National Independence. Some of the parish, still in the fog, try to revive the issue in their meet- ing of January next, but the parish will not open it; and, so far as appears, it has remained practically shut unto the pres- ent day. Dr. Watts having had the field for nearly ninety 36 HISTORY OF FRANKLIN. years, until the Puritan hymn book, born in Mendon Asso- ciation, crowded him onto the shelf of antiques. We are now, in our hasty trip down the past, coming into the outer edge of the storm-cloud of the Revolution. Rest- lessness is everywhere — in church and in state, in town and in country. This western precinct is full of uneasiness and debate, to which we cannot stop to listen. But the people are not disposed to neglect home interests, although the French and Indian wars, the depopulation of Acadia and the encroachments of the British crown appeal so earnestly to their attention. They have not forgotten the hymn which they learned at their mother's knee — "Whatever brawls disturb the street There should be peace at home; Where sisters dwell and brothers meet Quarrels should never come," and therefore they set themselves to composing their disturb- ances from the hymn book war, the complaints against the ministry and other ecclesiastical differences which have been developed thereby. It is a troublous time, but there are he- roic men to control it, and they set themselves down to the difficult problem. First of all, the empty pulpit must be filled with a pastor. The committee present one preacher after another, some of whom fail to meet with favor, and some are called, but — such is the discouraging aspect of things — decline the invi- tation. Of those so called are, Mr. Elijah Fitch, but he went to Hopkinton ; Mr. Nathan Perkins, but he chose West Hart- ford, Ct. Disheartened by these failures, they ponder if the meeting-house — now, in 1770, over thirty years old and too small for the large congregation, as well as antique in fash- ion — may not be a hindrance to their success, by indicating a spiritual negligence. The result is that in 1772, February 3, they detail five men " to consult upon the Conveniences and 111 Conveniences of Enlarging and Repairing their meeting- house, and to Draw a plan thereof and report." •HISTORICAL ADDRESS. B7 The result is that at the meeting of the parish on March 9, they vote " to Build a new meeting-house so Soon as it may be effected with Common Prudence and the circumstances of the people," and send out five men to search for that mova- ble north pole of the congregation — " the Senter of the pre- cinct." These five failing to find it, in April fifteen men, more sharp-eyed, perhaps, are delegated to help them. Twenty such men as Franklin can furnish (so quick at this time to detect theological differences and measure metres) will hardly miss the precise point, though the search may take all summer. September 7, they report the most commodious place to be "about eighty rods southerly from where the meeting-house now stands, between the two roads leading from the meeting-house to Mr. Pond's and the burying- ground." This report is accepted, and a committee is chosen to see on what terms the land can be bought and convenient roads obtained to the new site. While this question of a new meeting-house is thus favor- ably progressing, a small young man with a thin voice has been bashfully essaying to fill the pulpit in the old house on the hill. He came from Yale College in 1767, and has, since ^his approbation as a minister in October, 1769, been preach- ing in New York State and in New Hampshire. He has de- clined a call to settle in Campton, N. H., and may be else- where, because he feels himself " a speckled bird " for his positive opinions. But somehow the committee of supply have heard of him and ask him to occupy their vacant pul- pit. He, too, has heard of the second precinct in Wrentham, and that it contains two very vigorous and })ellicose parties. He cannot hope, as he afterwards said, that " nobody but little Nat Emmons" can unite tliem. But the night before he reaches town, he dreams that while riding along he sees a quail start out from the bushes on the right side, and anon another quail venture from the left side of the way. Thinking, What if I can catch both of them, he creeps softly towards them with his three-cornered hat in his 38 HISTORY OP FRANKLIN. hand and claps it successfully over both.* Encouraged by this omen, for he always preferred to see the new moon, over his right shoulder, he comes one Saturday night to this bellicose parish, and on Sunday morning into its little meeting-house among the pines, wondering where a con- gregation is to come from when hardly a liouse is in sight. But when they gather on foot and horse-back and by carriage- loads and fill it to overflowing, to listen so sharply and shrewdly to his clear-cut and logical sentences, his two quails have changed to more inspiriting and difficult game. How- ever, the little self-diffident young man so well succeeds that on Nov. 30, 1772, the church invite him, by a vote of thirty- two out of thirty-four present, to become their pastor ; and the precinct, fourteen days after, give a hearty amen to the choice. April 21, 1773, Nathanael Emmons is settled as third pas- tor of this people. The service was, like that of both his predecessors, held outside the meeting-house, in a valley west of the present Catholic church ; so that he was literally, as he said, " ordained not over but under the people." With the settlement of Dr. Emmons, whose ministry ex- tended down to the memory of so many of us, and of whose character and influence as a master in theology so much has been written, and so ably, I may, though reluctantly, omit from this address any farther account of our ecclesiastical history, referring you to the book to be published for its sub- sequent phases. I have presented so much of it because for the first century of the country church, precinct, and town, were practically identical, and their history one. The ministerial question being settled with brightening, prospects of permanency, which is really the central interest of a New England town, we may take a hasty glance at its civil progress. The spirit of self-dependence whicli secured the separate parochial organization in 1738, found itself as much incom- moded in going to Wrentham for town business as it had * See Professor Park's Memoir of Emmons. Works. Vol. I. HISTORICAL ADDRESS. 39 been for religious worship. As early as 1740, a motion was made in this precinct to petition Wrentliam to become a town by themselves, but there was not outside sympathy enough to carry it. The next year there was a movement to make a new town out of slices from Wrentliam and Medway. This also failed. The next spring, in 1742, it was proposed to build a town from the corners of Wrentham, Medway, Belling- ham, and Holliston. This met a like fate. A movement for a new precinct at the northwest, in 1747, was stopped, as well as another, in 1748, at the north end. These abortive mo- tions for a narrower area were too many to mention. But March 4, 1754, a more serious step was adopted by the pre- cinct, to petition both Wrentham and the General Court to be set off into a separate district, and a committee was chosen to engineer the project. But Wrentham simply refused the petition, without condescending to describe its purport on its records. Thus baffled in every movement for a district town- ship, and full of other matters difficult of adjustment and expensive, aroused also by the Stamp Act and other Lord North's vagaries, the people concluded to bide their time and go to Wrentham to vote or stay at home. So the town ques- tion had rest until the exigencies of the War of Independence called for still more frequent and energetic gatherings. Then it came up in earnest. In the war meetings necessary — seven in that current year of 1777 — it was a burden to travel from five to eight miles to Wrentham, and the population had become large enough to justify the civil separation of the two religious precincts. Therefore, Dec. 29, 1777, a petition is addressed to Wrentham for " liberty to be set off into a dis- trict township, according to grant of court that they were at first incorporated into a precinct, with a part of said town's money and stocks." Dea. Jabez Fisher, Esq., Jonathan Met- calf , Samuel Sethbridge, Asa Whiting, Dr. John Metcalf , Jos. Hawes, and Capt. John Boyd, chief men of the precinct, are put in charge of the matter. Wrentham responds, January 26, by adopting certain terms, and sends a committee of nine 40 HISTORY OF FRANKLIN. to give attention to the arguments of the Westerners. The result reported by the joint committee, February 21, is a unanimous conclusion that "said inhabitants be Set off as a Separate township by themselves," and the process is begun. In the further arrangements it is suggestive of the thrift of tlie whole town that there are but five paupers, two only of whom fall to the new town. It is agreed that the fire- arms, important assets now in 1777, be divided by the rela- tive pool and estate, and the ])owder, ball, flints, and other stores of that kind, according to the number of training-band and alarum list. The men raised for the Continental army are to be proportionally paid for and accredited to the town's quota. The salt allowed by the General Court is divided, and all other properties adjusted. After lengthy discussion and some scruples, whose phraseology suggests the sharp watch of Jabez Fisher, the precinct accepts the terms of the town and elects a committee to present their petition to the General Court. Among the acts of 1778 appears the charter of incorporation, dated in the House of Representatives, Feb- ruary 27, and in the council March 2. The petition which sets forth the arguments of our fathers for a separate civil existence, and the act by which such an existence was established, are of interest enough to be here inserted. To the Honorable Council i*^- Ilonse of Reprcsenfatives of the State of Blassaehuiietts Baij in General Court Assembled : The petition of the subscribers in behalf of the inhabitants of the West Precinct in Wrentliam Humbly sheweth : — That the Township of Wrentham is Considerably Large and the inhabitants with their Lands &: imprDvements are situated very much in two Divissions and but thinly settled Between the two Precincts, the Lands admitting of but few settlements. That the Publick Business of the Town Neces- sary to bo Transacted is very Considerable and has Long been Complained of as a Burden by those who are obliged to take a part, by means of Travil i^- Fatigue together with the Disa- pointments that often take place. That your Petitioners appre- hend themselves sutficient in Number and Ability for a Town, HISTORICAL ADDRP]SS. 41 and that in many Respects y" advantages to them would be much greater tlian to remain in their present situation. That they have lately obtained a vote of the Town Exj)ressing their willingness that your ))etitioners should be incorporated into a Town by the following Bound, viz Begining at Charles river where Med field line comes to said river thence running south seventeen Degrees and an half west untill it comes to one rod east of the Dwelling House of M'' William Man thence a strait line to the easterly Corner of M'' Asa Whitings Barn, thence a strait line to sixty rod, Due south of the old Cellar where the Dwelling House of Eben'" Healey formally stood a Due west Course by the Needle to Bellingham line said Bel- lingham line to be y*" West Bounds and Charles river to be the Northerly Bounds your pef** Therefore Humbly pray That your Honors wou'd be pleased to incorporate them into a Town by y*" al)ove Discribed Bound, With the same powers & Privi- leges that are allowed to other Towns within this state. And your pet""** as in Duty Bound shall pray Sam""- Lethbridg, Joseph Hawes ^ ^^ Joseph Whiting Jr State of Massachusetts ^la^ssachusetts | j^^ ^j^^ ^^^^^. ^^ ^^^. LORD 1778. An Act incorporating- the Westerly Part of the Toivn of Wrentham in the County of Suffolk into a Toivn by the name o/ Franklin. Whereas the Inhabitants of the Westerly part of the Town of Wrentham in the County of Suffolk have Rejiresented to this Court the Difficulties they Labour under in their present situation and pprehending themselves of sufficient Numbers & Al^ility request that they may be incorporated into a sepe- rate Town. Be it Therefore Enacted By the Council k House of Repre- sentatives in General Court Assembled & by the Authority of the same That the Westei'ly part of said Town of Wrentham seperated by a line as follows, viz Begining at Charles river whei-e Medfield line comes to said river, thence running south seventeen degrees and an half west untill it comes to one rod East of y' Dwelling House of William Man thence a strait line to the eastwardly corner of Asa Whiting' l)arn, thence a strait line to sixty rods due south of the old celler where the Dwell- ing House of Ebenezer Healy formerly stood thence a Due 42 HISTORY OP FRANKLIN. West Course by the Needle to Bcllingham line, said Belling- ham line to be the West Bounds and Charles river the North- erly Bounds, Be and hereby is incorporated into Distinct and seperate Town by the name of Franklin and invested with all the powers Privileges and immunities that Towns in this state do or may enjoy. And be it further enacted by the authority aforesaid. That the inhabitants of said Town of Franklin shall pay their proportion of all state county and Town Charges already granted to be raised in the Town of Wrentham and also their proportion of the pay of the Representative for the present Year and the said Towns of Wrentham and Town of Franklin shall severally be held punctually to stand by & perform to each other the Terms & proposals Contained and Expressed in a vote of the Town of Wrentham passed at Publick Town Meeting the sixteenth Day of February 1778 according to y* plain and obvions meaning thereof, and Be it also Enacted by y*" Authority aforesaid. That Jabez Fisher, Esq"^ Be & he hereby is authorized & required to issue his warrant to one of the principal inliabitants of said Town of Franklin, authorizing & requiring him to Notifie and warn the Freeholders & other inhabitants of said Town to meet together at such time and place as shall be expressed in said warrant. To choose such officers as Towns are authorized by Law to Choose and Transact other such LawfuU matters as shall be expressed in said warrant. And be it further enacted That the inhabitants living within y** Bounds aforesaid who in the Late Tax in the Town of wrentham wore rated one half part so much for their Estates and Faculties as for one single Poll shall be taken and Holden to be Qualified and be allowed to Vote in their first Meeting for the Choice of ofticers and such other meetings as may be Called in said Town of Franklin untill a valuation of Estates shall be made by Assessors there. In the House of Representatives, Feby. 27, 1778. This Bill having been read three several times passed to be engrossed. Sent up for Concurrence, J. Warren Syke. In Council, March 2d, 1778. This Bill having had two several Readings, passed a Concurrence, to be engrossed. Jno. Avery, Dpy. Secy. HISTORICAL ADDRESS. 43 In the original draft of the charter, as preserved in the State arcliives, the name of this town is written throughout Exeter. In some of the readings during its passage, that name was erased, and overwritten Franklin. In all the votes of this precinct and of Wrentham, I find no name suggested for the new town. They probably left its christening to the honored General Court. But why the name of Exeter was first inserted in the act, and why afterwards changed to Franklin, is a conundrum for the curious. I venture to sug- gest, however, that if the committee in charge of the petition were asked for a name of the new township, or if they were dissatisfied with the proposed Exeter, there was none of them more likely to suggest a change than its chairman, Jabez Fisher — an ardent patriot of liberty, and a prominent man in state councils ; and the reasons for preferring the name of Franklin to that of Exeter are not less apparent. It will be remembered that Benjamin Franklin, with two others, had been sent to France immediately upon the Declaration of Independence in 1776 to negotiate a treaty of recognition and alliance. But the French government cau- tiously dallied with him until the close of 1777. But the news of the capture of Burgoyne removed their hesitancies, and on the 6th of January Louis XVI entered into a treaty of amity and commerce with the colonies. The news came rapidly to this country, and it was a graceful tribute to the successful diplomatist, Franklin, that the town, just at that date applying for incorporation, should bear his name. Though we may be among the smallest of the twenty-nine Franklins in our tribes of Columbia, besides the nineteen Franklinvilles, Franklintons, etc., yet we are the first-born heir of this large family, and oldest to the honors of the distinguished name. We may well commemorate our birth- day with centennial rejoicings. The ambassador to St. Cloud, as soon as his weighty duties permitted, showed that he himself understood and ap- preciated the compliment. For he requested Dr. Price, of 44 HISTORY OF FRANKLIN. London, to make choice of proper books for a library for Franklin, as his acknowledgment to his namesake in Massa- chusetts.* That library contained, according to the earliest catalogue extant. 116 volumes, many of them folios, and of which the most secular and frivolous was the life of Baron Trenk. It has become the basis of a public library of 3,000 volumes. And Dr. Franklin had no occasion to be ashamed of either the intelligence or the patriotism of his namesake town ; for its prompt and unanimous participation in all the trying times of the War of Independence fully assured him of both. The responses of this town were prompt and hearty to every move- ment in defense of the liberties of the colonies — even from the time of the salary debate with Governor Burnet in 1728 imto the acknowledgment of their independence in 1783. Whether the calls were for troops or for money, for opinions upon poli- cies or protests against royal aggressions, the town always answered, and in no lukewarm words or ambiguous actions. Indeed, some of the papers reported by special committees and adopted by this town are worthy of careful study in this day of wordy ambiguities, as models of patriotic and broad political sense not surpassed even by the wise colonial proclamations. And this is not surprising when the wisest aiid best men of the town were chosen as the Committee of Correspondence, Representatives to the General Court, and delegates to District Conventions. It is now well known that Boston, as the metropolis of New England, and especially restive under its so close contact with the officers of the British crown, vigilantly watched their every movement, and informed the committees of correspond- ence of each town in its vicinity. The towns replied vigo- rously to these Boston letters. Thus the pulsations of liberty beat isochronously in all patriotic hearts, and a unified pur- pose gathered into strength in every arm. That sympathy of intelligence and feelmg was the spirit of ultimate victory ; for * See Addenda for more extended notice of the Franklin Library. HISTORICAL ADDRESS. 45 the resisting Bostonians knew Avhom they had behind them, hid away in the little hamlets and on the scattered farms to the north, west and south of the Bay. When, therefore, they sounded the alarm on the attempted seizure of the stores at Concord, in a few hours twenty thousand armed men from the country towns hurried to Boston and barricaded it from Dor- chester to Chelsea, as if they would force Governor Gage and his soldiers into the sea. In all these movements, Franklin was never a whit behind. It had more than one man in it like Jabez Fisher, whose fervor kindled and whose wisdom di- rected its action perpetually. But Fislier's hand is especially traceable in the reports and resolves of the town during the revolutionary period. The Stamp Act of 1765 called forth a very earnest protest from the town. But the letter from Boston in 1772, on the Governor's assumption that the colonial charter should be in- terpreted or revoked even, at the pleasure of the King, and on the order of Parliament that the salaries of the Governor, Judges, &c., should be taken directly from the American rev- enues, instead of paid by grant of the General Court as afore- time, awakened a deep and wide alarm, and drew out vigorous responses from all the towns. Boston denounced the assump- tion as an infraction of its charter, and the parliamentary order as a direct and long step towards despotism. The let- ter to the towns — after a recital of the facts — closes thus : " Let us consider, brethren, we are struggling for our best rights and inheritance, which being infringed renders all blessings precarious in their enjoyment, and consequently tri- fling in their value. Let us disappoint the men who are raising themselves on the ruin of this country. Let us convince every invader of our freedom that we will be as free as the Consti- tution our Fathers recognized will justify." Of this appeal, and the historical statements accompanying, over six hundred copies were printed and sent to the towns. The copy sent to Franklin drew out a long and vigorous statement of our fathers' theory of their rights. 46 HISTORY OF FRANKLIN. Their paper deserves a place in this history of their times, as showing their clear appreciation of the situation. It was adopted in a public town meeting, 11th January, 1773 : — 1. Resolved that the British Constitution is grounded on the eternal law of Nature, a Constitution whose foundation and center is liberty, which sends liberty to any subject that is or may happen to be within any part of its ample circum- ference. 2. That every part of the British dominions hath a right freely to enjoy all the benefits and privileges of this happy Constitution, and that no power of Legislation or Governors on Earth can justly abridge or deprive any part of the British dominions from their liberties, without doing violence to his happy Constitution and its true principles. 3. That every part of the British dominions in which acts of the liritish Parliament are exercised contrary to the true princi!)les of the Constitution have always and ought to have a right to petition and remonstrate, or join in petitioning and remonstrating to the King, Lords and Commons of Great Britain, that all such acts of Parliament may speedily be re- moved, abrogated and repealed. 4. That the Province of Massachusetts Bay have a right, not only by nature and the laws of England, but by social compact, to enjoy all the rights, liberties and immunities of natural and freeborn subjects of Great Britain to all intents and purposes whatever ; and that acts of the British Parlia- ment imposing rates and duties of the inhabitants of this Province, while they are unrepresented in the Parliament of Great Britain, are violations of those rights and ought to be contended for with firmness. Resolved^ That it is the opinion of this town that the act of the British Parliament in assuming the power of Legislation for the Colonies in all cases whatsoever, and in consequence of that act have carried into execution that assumed power in laying duties on divers articles in the Colonies for the ex- press purpose of raising a revenue without their consent, either by themselves or their Representatives, whereby the right which any man has to his own property is wholly taken away and destroyed ; and what is more alarming still is, to see the amazing inroads which have been made and still are making in our charter rights and privileges by placing a Board of Commissioners amongst us under so large a com- HISTORICAL ADDRESS. 47 mission with a train of attendants to sap the foundation of our industry — our Coasts surrounded with fleets — standing armies placed in free cities in time of peace without the con- sent of the inliabitants, whereby the streets of tlie Metropolis of tliis Province have been stained witli the blood of its inno- cent inhabitants ; the Governor of this Province made inde- pendent of the grants of tlie General Assembly ; large sala- ries affixed to the Lieutenant-Governor, the Judges of the Admiralty, etc. ; the amazing stretch of the power of the courts of Vice, admitting in a great measure depriving the people in the Cols, of their right to trial by Jury and such like innovations, which ai'C intolerable grievances, tending wholly to deprive us of our Charter riglits and privileges, pull down the Constitution and reduce us to a state of abject slavery. Resolved^ That it is the opinion of this town that the pre- vailing report, which they have reason to apprehend is well- grounded, that further inroads are contemplating on their rights and liberties by affixing stipends to the offices of the Judges of the Superior Courts of Judicature, etc., whereby they are to be made wholly independent of the grants of the General Assembly for tlieir support, is such a large stride towards despotism as fills us with fresh and more alarming fears of further invasions of our rights and privileges being trampled upon, viz : By making the Judges thus dependent upon the Crown for their place and support will have a ten- dency to bribe the present respectable gentlemen to become tools to a despotic administration, and if that should fail, it will be easy to supply their seats with those calculated for such a purpose. 2d, Thus calculated, nothing will be want- ing but an absolute Government which maybe over the Prov- ince qualified with new acts of Parliament adapted to their purpose which would exclude every individual in this Prov- ince from asserting and supporting his riglits, and turn the sacred stream of justice into but little sliort of an unwar- ranted inquisition. Resolved, That this town ever acknowledge the care and vigilance which the town of Boston liave discovered in stating the rights of the Colonies in so just a manner, and in point- ing out the many infringements and violations of those rights this Province labors under, at the same time assuring them that as this town hopes never to be wanting in their duty and loyalty to their King, so they are ever ready to do everything 48 HISTORY OF FRANKLIN. in their power in a constitutional way to assist in carrying into execution sucli measures as may be adapted to remove those difficulties we feel, and to prevent tliose we have reason to fear. In the name of the Committee, David Man. The committee were David Man, Capt. John Smith, Jahez Fisher, Lemuel Kollock, Thomas Man. This was the key-note of every resolve passed by the town in its thirty-one town meetings held in the live years between January, 1773 — the beginning of Governor Hutchinson's as- sumptions — and February 16,1778 — the last meeting held before the separation of Franklin from Wrentham. This trumpet certainly gave no uncertain sound of the coming conflict with royal dictation. The town, also, had a way in those days of instructing their representatives to the General Court how to act on measures which touched their vital interests. These papers expressed the sentiments of the citizens, and became, there- fore, valuable indices of the popular convictions. Amongst the most expressive of these papers, and certainly very sug- gestive of the ripeness for independence of this part of the colony, are the instructions adopted in the town meeting of June 5, 1776. They have a ring of liberty whose echoes ought to thrill in the ears of the supple and molluscous men of these hesitating times. They are addressed " to Mr. Benjamin Guild, Mr. Joseph Hawes, and Doct. Ebenezer Dag- gett, chosen to represent the town of Wrentham in the General Assembly, the ensuing year: — Gentlemen, We, your constituents, in full town meeting, June 5, 1776, give you the following instructions : — Whereas, Tyranny and oppression, a little more than one century and a half ago, obliged our forefathers to quit their peaceful habitations, and seek an asylum in this distant land, amidst an howling wilderness, surrounded with savage ene- mies, destitute almost of every convenience of life was their unhappy situation ; but such was their zeal for the common rights of mankind, that they (under the smile of Divine HISTORICAL ADDRESS. 49 Providence), surmounted every difficulty, and in a little time were in the exercise of civil government under a char- ter of the crown of Great Britain: — but after some years had passed, and the colonies had become of some importance, new troubles began to arise. The same spirit which caused them to leave their native land still pursued them, joined by designing men among themselves — letters began to be wrote against the government, and the first charter soon after destroyed ; in this situation some years passed before another charter could be obtained, and although many of the gifts and priviliges of tlie first charter were abridged by the last, yet in that situation the government has been tolerably quiet until about tlie year 1763 ; since which the same spirit of op- pression has risen up ; letters by divers ill-minded persons have been wrote against the Government, (in consequence of wliich divers acts of the British Parliament made, muti- lating and destroying the charter, and wholly subservive of the constitution) ; fleets and armies have been sent to enforce them, and at length a civil war has commenced, and tlie sword is drawn in our land, and the whole united colonies involved in one common cause ; the repeated and humble petitions of the good people of these colonies have been wan- tonly rejected with disdain ; tlie Prince we once adored has now commissioned the instruments of his hostile oppression to lay waste our dwellings with fire and sword, to rob us of our property, and wantonly to stain the land with the blood of its innocent inhabitants ; he has entered into treaties with the most cruel nations to hire an army of foreign mercenaries to subjugate the colonies to his cruel and arbitrary purposes. In short, all liope of an accommodation is entirely at an end, a reconciliation as dangerous as it is absurd ; a recollection of past injuries will naturally keep alive and kindle the flames of jealousy. We, your constituents, therefore think that to be subject or dependent on the crown of Great Britain would not only be impracticable, but unsafe to the state ; the in- habitants of this town, therefore, in full town meeting, Unani- mously instruct and direct you (t. e. the representatives) to give your vote that, if the Honorable American Congress (in whom we place the highest confidence under God,) should think it necessary for the safety of the United Colonies to declare them independent of Great Britain, that we your constituents with our lives and fortunes will most cheerfully support them in the measure. 50 HISTORY OF FRANKLIN. The record of this arousing utterance, less than a month before the famous 4th of July, 1776, very modestly says : " The above report, after being several times distinctly read and considered by the town, was unanimously voted in the affirmative ivithoiit even one dissentient.^^ But these votes, unlike tlie resolves of many later conven- tions, meant all they avowed of work, self-denial, blood — for the records of the town show that carefully deliberated and resolutely formed determinations lay behind them. The men of that time had put their hands to the plow with no intention of looking back until their furrows had uprooted every trans- plant of a foreign monarchy in this land of freedom. Accord- ingly, on the first open aggression of the coming collision, when Governor Gage encamped his troops on Boston Common, the town voted, Sept. 15, 1774, to buy two pieces of cannon, " of the size & Bigness most proper & beneficial for the town ;" and at an adjournment, two weeks later, it appointed Mr. Joseph Spur and Oapt. Perez Gushing chief gunners, and ordered each to see that his piece was " fit for action as soon as may be." Affairs were rapidly coming to some crisis. Governor Gage had suspended the meeting of the General Court, which he had called at Salem for October 5. But ninety members met, and with John Hancock as President, adjourned to Cambridge. Here they formed a plan for the defense of the Colony, and directed a general enlistment of 12,000 men to be ready at a minute's notice for action. Hence the two cannon for self- protection, the minute-men enlisted by town vote, the commis- sion of Jabez Fisher as delegate to a Provincial Congress at Concord on the second Tuesday of October, and the " increase of the town stock to such a degree with powder. Ball & shot as the gunners & Captains of each parish shall think pro- per." The town also adopted the advice of the Provincial Congress, and at a special meeting November 22, ordered the constables not to pay any town moneys to Harrison Gray, the royalist treasurer, but to Henry Gardner of Stow, for the use of the Province, •' and the town will stand in the way of any harm to them." HISTORICAL ADDRESS. 51 At the meeting of Jan. 4, 1775, a Committee of Inspection of fifteen were ordered to see to the execution of the advice of the Continental and Provincial Congresses, and another of seven to secure two companies of minute-men to tlie number of one-fourth of the training band lists. These committees- were : 1st, Elislia Ware, Jeremiah Day, John Whiting, Doct,^ Ebenezer Daggett, Lieut. Joseph Everett, Lieut. Samuel Fisher, Lieut. Joseph Fairbanks, John Hall, Esq., Samuel Cowellj. Joseph Whiting, Jr., Doct. John Metcalf, Samuel Lethbridge, Joseph Woodward, Capt. Perez Cashing, and Dea. Jabc/ Fisher ; 2d., Benjamin Hawes, Dea. Jabez Fisher, Joseph Wood- ward, Dea. Thomas Man, Asa Whiting, Lieut. Samuel Fisher, and Lemuel Kollock. Under such men things move vigorously. The minute-men are equipped each " with a good fire-arm, bayonet, pouch, knapsack, and thirty rounds of cartridge by the twentieth day of February " — for they know not how soon Gage's mercena- ries may be after their two cannon, and the two captains are directed to " train and exercise the men in military exercise one half day in every fortnight to the 1st of April next, and from and after that time to the 1st of May next two half days in every week, four hours in every half day."* For this service the captains will receive 16d. per half day, each sub- altern officer 14d., four sergeants per each company 12d., four corporals, one drummer and one fifer, each lOd., and each private 9d. But Concord and Lexington and Bunker Hill are demand- ing more than minute-men, trainings, and letters of commit- tees of correspondence. Though our half of the committee of eleven be such men as Hezekiah Fisher, Joseph Hawes, Capt. Asa Fairbanks, Capt. Perez Cushing, and Joseph Whit- ing, yet the country wants men in the field. The town, tliere- fore, springs promptly to the call for fifteen battalions offered by Massachusetts ; and when volunteers lag, it orders, 8th July, 1776, the two companies to draft " whom they think * For lists of Frank! in's minute-men see military chapter in Addenda. 52 HISTORY OP FRANKLIN. most Equal and Just to do a turn or half turn, reference be- ing had to what they formerly had done," who shall go, find a substitute, or pay <£8 per turn to the officers to procure one. In the spring of 1777, as the conflict deepens into a war, 40s. per month, after the first year, are offered to three years' men; or, if they prefer, £20 at once, in addition to the Continental and State bounties. But the patriots had eyes to look sharply after home enemies as well as foreign ; and at the suggestion of the State Assembly they choose, May 26, 1777, Mr. Joseph Hawes to look after and report all tories to the proper court. The sol- diers' families are not forgotten, and a committee is chosen, September 3, to see that they are " supplied with the neces- saries of life at a stipulated price, at the town's cost." The last vote of the whole town, previous to the incorpora- tion of Franklin, touching the war, was on Feb. 16, 1778, and is the acceptance of a committee's report tliat the full quota of the town, " being the full seventh part of the male inhabitants of this town," has been secured by the enlistment of five men at £60 for each man. With this clean record for liberty, the town of Franklin starts on its independent career. Our records as a new town open with a copy of the act of incorporation and the order for a meeting to organize, issued by Jabez Fisher, justice of the peace, and addressed to Sam- uel Lethbridge " one of the principal inhabitants." That first meeting is held ou Monday, March 23, 1778, at 9 o'clock, a. m ., and chooses its town officers and its committee of correspond- ence — Capt. John Boyd, Dea. Daniel Thurston, Lieut. Eben- ezer Dean, Capt. Thomas Bacon, Joseph Guild, the leading patriots of the town — and then adjourns one month to look into and make up their minds upon the new State constitution. In no whit in any subsequent meetings was the town derelict to any call for aid from the State or the struggling nation. Of the burdens of that time we have little conception. We have been restive under the expenses of the late rebellion HISTORICAL ADDRESS. 63 and the depreciation of our currency, and some resist resump- tion when it involves a fall of only one-quarter of one per cent. But in July, 1781, the ratio of paper to silver was as one to forty ; and in September, as one to one hundred and fifty. In February, 1782, the town paid X400 for ten shirts to Dea, Joseph Whiting ; who, of course, would not overcharge. In this same year of '82, the town expenses amounted to .£100,765 Is. 6d., in which tlie collector had unwittingly taken .£51 counterfeit — relatively to the value of the rest, a very small offense ! No wonder the town voted, March, 1784, that "the old Continental money and the new emission money in the town treasury shall go into a ministerial fund forever." It was a grim joke upon a paper currency, and explains, perhaps, why you cannot now find that fund. But the fathers endured this bitter depreciation as the home part of the price of liberty. They also readily adopted the scale of prices recommended by the Concord Convention of 1779 — to keep down exorbitant charges — and chose a com- mittee to see to it, and they voted to publish in the Boston papers the names of all non-conformists to the prices. They voted also, that "■ the town will have no commercial dealings with sucli.'" It furnishes its quota of beef for the army — 33,908 lbs. in eighteen months — and supplies the men sent to suppress the Shays Rebellion of 1786. There is a flash of fire in some of their resolutions of that day whose heat still lingers in their words — as when, in 1779, while the money credit of the government was rapidly falling, this town recommended by vote to all who had money to loan to lend it to the Continental and State treasuries, and " avoid lending to monopolizers. Jobbers, Harpies, Forestallers, sharp- ers and Tories, with as much caution as they avoid a pesti- lence." We look on sucli a record of our town with high sat- isfaction. The record of its individual citizens is no less commendable, as will appear in the military history. But we must leave the camp to look again at the affairs at home. 54 HISTORY OF FRANKLIN. It is no dubious proof of the pluck of our fatliers that, ere the smoke of the Revolutionaiy War had hardly rolled away, they set about building a new meeting-house. The old house had stood over forty years, has become ragged with use, and strait for the increasing population. But what is the wisest to do, is a question decided first this way and then that. One point, however, must be settled — whether the center of the town may not have shifted with the independence of the country and the growth of its inlial)itants. Two surveyors and three chainmen are, therefore, (in January, 1784,) set upon this old problem ; who find, after many days and at a cost of X26 3s. 4d. (of which XI 12s. lid. are for" Lickquer"), this perplexing center of Franklin to l^e " N. W. 71°, forty- seven rods from the center of the west door of the meeting- house where it now stands ;" which lands it not far from the same Morse's mud ])ond as fifty years l)efore. A committee is, therefore, sent out to perambulate that region and rej)ort what they shall find in its vicinity. They negotiate successfully with Nathaniel and John Adams for the present Common and its approaches. Another committee of thirteen present plans for a new meeting-house, all of which is accepted in December, 1787, and the meeting-house Avhich arose out of so many votes and counter votes was completed l)v July, 1788, at a final cost of Xl,054 9s. 2d. Iqr. That house served its purpose for over fifty years, until, in 1840, it suffered a removal and a trans- formation. The last service held in it was on Monday, Sept. 28, 1840 ; it l>eing the funeral of the pastor. Dr. Emmons, who was ordained in this town sixty-seven years before. The next day after the carpenters ])egan their work of alterations. That transforination was before the day of photographs, so that no picture remains of our old meeting-house, save the fading re- membrance which lingers in the memory of a few of us boys and girls of 1840. I have attempted to reproduce its picture as I recollect it, which the reader will find further on. The house was sixty feet by forty-two, with a porch at each end fourteen feet square. It had fifty-nine pews on the floor HISTORICAL ADDRESS. 55 and twenty-one in tlie g-allery, besides the singers' and Loys' seats. The present Catholic chnrch is tlie ohl lionsc frame unaltered in size. But what picture can produce its interior on some pleasant Sunday morning in June ! Its high box pulpit and impend- ing sounding board, hung by a single iron rod, an inch square ; the two pegs on each side of the pulpit window, on one of which sometimes hangs the blue-black cloak, and on the other always the three-cornered clerical hat ; by no means omitting the short, lithe preacher in the pulpit, with clear sharp eye, bald shining head, and small penetrating voice, and manu- script gesture. The square pews, too, seated on four sides, with a drop seat across the narrow door, and the straight cushioned chair in the center for the grandmother, filled, every one, with sedate faces, over which white hairs unusu- ally predominate ; and the long seats hemming the galleries, piled with hats against the two aisles, which a puff of wind from the porch entries sometimes sends down scattering upon the heads below. The singers' seats, filling the front gallery opposite the pulpit, in which nothing bigger than a pitch-pipe for years dared to utter a note ; and the boys' seats in the southwest elbow of the gallery, each boy with one eye on the tithing-man in the opposite corner, while the other eye wan- ders or sleeps, and both ears enviously open to the neighing of the horses in the sheds and the twitter of the birds in the Lombardy ])oplars near by I But the s{)irit of modern reform in 1840 demolished every vestige of that picture and carried off even the frame of the building to a new foundation. As a result of that demolition, the top of the old sounding-board lighted upon a well-house in Ashland, the breastwork of the old pulpit landed in the lecture-room of the Chicago Theological Seminary, and if you would once again listen to the sound of the same old bell which called your grandfathers and grandmothers to meetings on Sunday and lecture-days, and tolled their departure to the grave, you can hear it still — or could — ringing out as clearly 56 HISTORY OF FRANKLIN. as ever in the CongTegational steeple in Paxton, and reputed as the most musical bell in Worcester county. But before we leave the old meeting-house, we nmst give one word to the Common in front of it. It was, when bought of the Adamses, covered with pitch-pines. While the meet- ing-house was being built, in 1788, ►'^amuel Lethbridge offered to clear it up and subdue it within five years, for one penny a poll of the ])arish and time to raise four cro])s upon it and dispose of the stones as he pleased. A different bargain, how- ever, was made with him for this woric, for in 1793 lie re- ceived £5 14s. 3M. for subduing the Common. But the conquest was so far incomplete that in 1797 another bill of $92.15 was paid for blasting powder, plowing, hay seed, victuals, and drink, from which deduct $31.24 credit for twenty bush- els of buckwheat, hay, and stones, and you have $60.91 ex- pended in completing the victory over Nature. The platoons of Lombardy poplars which stood guard so erect and slim on three sides of the Common, and which fur- nished us boys with whistles on election days, were planted by vote of the town 6th April, 1801, by William Adams " at his discretion." * No town has a larger or finer plat of public territory for adornment, and in no town would a public park — tastefully set with walks, trees, and shrubbery, as this might be — add more to the beauty of its location. The local society for its improvement deserves, as I presume it will have, the cordial and visible co-operation of the whole town. Our Common should become a museum of every species of tree indigenous to the hills and valleys of this township, — where the young can study the characteristics of the forest while they talk of the century to come, and of the homes which they hope to build in the hereafter. But my hour is over, and a score of perhaps more interest- ing topics must be relegated to the ])rinted history in process of immediate preparation. * See its further liistory in the Addenda. HISTORICAL ADDRESS. 57 The uprise of other churches and religious societies in this once single precinct — of which there now are at least six in vigorous operation ; the industrial enterprises — from the saw-mill on Mine brook, laid out in 1698, now the site of one of the Rays' numerous felting mills ; the humble straw begin- nings of Major Thayer, in 1800, to the present varied and ex- tensive manufactories of the town ; the names and deeds of the veterans of the Revolution, and of the no less prompt volunteers to suppress the rebellion of 1861 ; the schools, and especially the honorable list of college graduates, the pro- fessional men and eminent citizens, -native or resident — not forgetting the distinguished women, not a few — who have marked their day here or elsewhere ; of whom, as of Prof. Alexander M. Fisher of Yale, Judge Theron Metcalf, and Hon. Horace Mann, this town may well be proud, as her own native born — not forgetting the old Academy of 1835-40, whose memory shines yet as a bright morning in at least one soul ; these and other kindred themes must wait their opportunity. And not less the hundred and one other apparently little things which, nevertheless, give foliage and fragrance to history, as amongst the really developing forces of society. I have simply culled a few of the taller stalks from the harvest-field of a hundred years, to make a boquet for your centennial table to-day. It is a specimen only out of the years from which others might have gathered a much richer handful. But to me the culling has been among familiar acres, and the work has been a labor of love. As such, I beg to lay it before you to-day, with the hope that you will excuse the omission of your favorite flowers, and accept it as my offering to the old town which has always rendered me far more honor than I feel myself to be worthy of. May the patriotism, the steadfast integrity, the intelligence, and the harmony which beautify the history of the past cen- tury of this town, shine on clearer and purer into the coming centuries, as far and as long as the name of Franklin, Mass., can be read ! ADDENDA. ADDENDA. The many matters of topography, civil, ecclesiastical, educa- tional, indastrial, and military history, which could not properly have mention in the public address — valuable documents, statis- tics, etc., are here contained in some order of arrangement under their appropriate heads. I. TOPOGRAPHY. The town of Franklin, whose general history is given in the preceding address, lies in the southwestern part of Norfolk county, Mass., and is southwesterly from Boston twenty-seven and one- quarter miles by the New York and New England Railroad. It contained within its original limits, as measured by the survey of 1832, 17,602^ acres, or 27.6 square miles. In 1870 the north- eastern portion of the town was set off to the new town of Nor- folk, formerly North Wrentham. This area included about 1,653 acres, lea\ing some 15,949 acres as the present extent of Frank- lin. It has the rolling, hilly surface which belongs to the Syenitic formation of eastern Massachusetts, and affords many beautiful views. From some of its elevated highway's the Blue hills of Milton are visible, and from others can be seen Mount Wachuset in Princeton. It is one of the highest towns in the county, its central depot being on the summit of the New York and New England Railroad, and is one of the most healthful towns in the Commonwealth. It has several ponds — Beaver, Uncas, Popolatic, and Kingsbury's being the largest — whose overflow ultimately reaches the Charles river and Massachusetts bay, through Mine brook, and Stop, or Mill, river. The elevation of the town, the general beauty of its scenery, and its railroad facilities — to say nothing of its social advantages 62 HISTORY OF FRANKLIN. — are rapidl}' attracting attention to it as a summer resort or a country home. The many other facts which constitute and de- termine its desirableness as a^ place of residence or of business, will find a place under their appropriate heads in this supplemen- tary histor}'. II. CIVIL HISTORY. The main facts of our interior life are contained in the histori- cal address. Upon the subsidence of the war for liberty, society rapidl}^ assumed its normal state and began its normal develop- ment. Little has occurred in the history proper of the town de- manding especial mention. The regular town meetings were held, at which the necessaiy^ officers were chosen, of whom a list is given at the end, and the necessary expenses of the town were provided for. Being mostly a farming communit}', the population increased very slowly. At the date of incorporation it was less than 1,100. Its census, at the several dates computed, has been — in 1790, 1,101 ; in 1800, 1.2.55 ; in 1810, 1,398 ; in 1820, 1,630 ; in 1830, 1,662 ; in 1840, 1,717 ; in 1850, 1,818 ; in 1855, 2,044 ; in 18G0, 2,172 ; in 1865, 2,510 ; in 1870, 2,512 ; and in 1875, 2,983. As the boundaries of the parish were territorially coincident with those of the town, the interests of the two were substantial!}- one, and both interests were often acted upon in the same meet- ing. Hence the records do not discriminate between doings strictly civil and properl}' ecclesiastical. But b}' a statute of 1803, it was declared that such transaction of parochial business in open town meeting vitiated the proceedings, and a committee was chosen at the March meeting of 1804 to petition the General Court to ratify all past acts of town and parish, and to incorpor- ate the latter as " the First Congregational parish in the town of Franklin." Up to tliis date, therefore, are selected such acts from either precinct or town records as have interest for preserva- #on and have not been already quoted in the general history. The first warrant for organizing the precinct was issued hy Jonathan Ware, justice of the peace, to Robert Pond, Daniel Hawes, Da^ad Jones, Daniel Thurston, and John Adams, " to meet at the house the inhabitants of sd precinct usuall3-meet in for pub- lic worship," Monday, 16th of January, at 10 o'clock. 1738. Meas- ADDENDA. 63 ures were immediately taken for selecting a site and erecting a meeting-house, and for procuring a minister. The church, being present, acted jointl}' witli the precinct in these ecclesiastical mat- ters. The salary proposed was six score pounds, old tenor, to rise and fall with the value of money, and a settlement of £200 ; or, if preferred, £60 and the two parcels of land, containing sixty acres, granted by AVrentham at a proprietors' meeting 18th April, 1721, " whenever the}^ be legally set off." Another £100 was, in Jul}', added to buy woodland for the ministerial fires. The deed of an acre of land from Thomas Man for a meeting- house lot was accepted 11th September, 1739, and put for safe keeping into the care of Simon Slocum. On account of the high price of provisions, the precinct voted, 22d December, 1742, a contribution, to be taken on the last Sab- bath of each month for four months, for the relief of the minister. In 1762, when religious differences began to make votes im- portant, the right of franchise was by vote limited "to such as have a freehold in house and land lying within the precinct.' The same differences occasioned frequent and sometimes long meetings; and it was ordered, 14th March, 1763, to put upon " the acre " a white pine stick for a trough and painted, proba- bly for the use of horses who had no interest in awaiting the long discussions of parish affairs. It was somewhat of a trough, cost- ing 44s. How it was filled with Avater no record reveals. Per- haps the sexton, who had 15s. for sweeping the meeting-house and "taking care of the chosen" (things), needed no instructions. For many years discussions and perambulations of town boun- daries and laying out roads constituted the chief business of the town meetings. But the location of roads b}- marked trees, cor- ners of farms, etc., renders their present description useless. Guide-posts are not mentioned until 1795, March 23, when the selectmen are directed to erect them according to law. The records show that all minor matters of town thrift were properlj- looked after. III. BURYING-GROUNDS. Two had been provided at the beginning of the settlement by grants of land from the proprietors ; one for the convenience of the settlers around Stop river, and another for those who migrated from 64 HISTORY OF FRANKLIN. Wrentliam. These yards appear to have lain open and uncared for until 1768, when the precinct appointed a committee for each burial place, to clear up and fence them with good stone walls. In 1793, committees are appointed to again clear them, repair the fences, appoint sextons, and fix the fees for interment. In 1808, the south (central) bur3-ing-ground was enlarged b}' an addition of ninety-eight rods, bought of Simeon Partridge and an enclosing two-rail fence with sawed posts was ordered. These same ceme- teries, with subsequent enlargements, are now in use, and the chil- dren are laid where " The forefathers of the hamlet slept." A hearse was purchased by the town in May, 1803, and rules were adopted regulating its use. This black and somber vehicle was used until the purchase of a new one b}' the town in April, 1837, which latter was supplanted by another in 1853. The taste and requirements of the community led, in 1860, to the formation ■of the Franklin Cemeter}' Association, which purchased and laid out several acres on the west side and adjoining the Central bury- ing-ground. The town added six acres to its own yard, and the two cemeteries are now practically one. In 1867, Saul B. Scott gave land for an enlargement of the City Mills Cemetery. In 1864, J. L. Fitzpatrick and eleven others organized and secured a burial-ground called the Catholic Cemetery, of which the town ap- proved b}' vote, November 8. It seems a proper place here to give a few facts about the EMMOKS MONUMENT. While W. M. Thayer was a member of Brown University, Dr. Wa3land, the President, suggested to him in a private conversa- tion, that Dr. Emmons deserved a more public monument than the village cemetery could afford, and that his many friends out of town were anxious to express in some permanent form their ap- preciation of his valuable labors for truth. The idea received a cordial response from the people of Franklin, and steps taken to realize it in stone. A meeting was called and the Emmons Monument Association was ultimately organized, 5th March, 1844. The constitution, -adopted 23d March, defined its sole object to be to erect a suita- ADDENDA. 65 ble monument to the memory of Nathanael Emmons, D. D., and that it shall be " erected on or near the spot where the old meet- ing-house stood — that spot, hallowed by his faithful labors of more than half a century, and that house where his voice was heard at its dedication, and in which the last services performed were his funeral solemnities." This article is made unalterable, except by unanimous vote of the Association. To this constitu- tion twenty-seven names of citizens were attached. In accord- ance with its provisions, a committee of three was chosen to select the precise site for a monument, and other committees necessary to secure funds, etc. The first committee. Rev. Drs. Wayland of Providence, Codman of Dorchester, and Burgess of Ded- ham, after viewing the available locations, reported that the ' ' monument be erected on the public ground in front of the church, if this can be permanently secured for the public, and the ground be properly graded, ornamented and enclosed. The reasons for this preference over the burying-ground are, that there is no room for such a monument in the latter place, and that, inasmuch as this is not strictly a personal memorial, but rather a public testi- monial of the esteem in which his life-work and labors were held by his townsmen and friends, the most central situation and the most frequented, seems to us the most appropriate place." The report was adopted and subscriptions immediately opened. Responses came from even distant towns, whose names there is not room to give; and June 17, 1846, a granite monument was erected with public services, near the center of the Common, across which the venerated pastor had traveled to and fro for over half a century. A large company gathered i^ the church, where an address was given by Rev. M. Blake, and then adjourned to the Common in front, where the dedicatory address was made by Rev. T. D. Southworth, then pastor of the church. This monument remained a central and often visited object, un- til a new and inexplicable impulse moved it into the new part of the cemetery and out of public sight ; contrary to the unalterable provision of the society which located and erected it. IV. THE COMMON was purchased of Nathaniel and John Adams in 1787. Unlike most towns, the proprietors of this town seem to have donated no 66 HISTORY OF FRANKLIN. tract of land for a Common or training tield. When the first meeting-honse became antiquated and contracted, the question of a new sanctuar\^ raised also that of a larger and better site thaix " the acre " given by Thomas Man. As soon, therefore, as a new house was decided upon, a committee was chosen 3d December, 1787, to negotiate with John Adams for the purchase of " the 34- rod spot." On the 17tli following the}^ reported : — We have agreed with Mr. John Adams for the wedge of land lying between the way from the meeting-house leading to the Rev. Nathanael Emmons and the way from the said meeting-house tO' Ens. John Adams, being nine acres, at £1 10s. per acre : also, 38 rod of land west of said way at the same rate ; also 1^ acres in the hollow south of the old meeting-house at £3. And of Nathan- iel Adams 140 rods of land east of the way from said meeting- house leading to Mr. Emmons, at the rate of £1 10s. per acre. Also a road three rods wide through his improved land, beginning at the road from John Adams, Jr., to go a straight course betweeni his house and well to the land above mentioned. For which he is to receive as a satisfaction £8 in money and the acre of land whereon the meeting-house now stands, with the road that is now wanted, in b}' his house, to said acre. The bargain was sanctioned, and in December, 1789, the towu voted to buy the piece of land north of the new meeting-house, once bought of Nathaniel Adams by John Richardson, to make the Common more convenient, at 6d. per rod, containing 59^ rods- This addition was balanced by the sale to Nathaniel Adams of a small piece of shrub land lying on a side-hill south of the old meeting-house. In October, 1790, the plan of the Common thu& constructed was accepted, and certain old roads now useless were discontinued. A new road was opened from Abijah Thurston's through the land of John Adams to the new meeting-house, and Adams was directed to " clear up the part of his land west of the road leading from his house to the meeting-house for the safety of said house." In subsequent years the ownership of the Common was a mat- ter of frequent discussion between town and parish. But so far as appears, all after improvements upon it were made by private subscriptions ; and the fact of a movement to have the town pur- chase the Common of the parish, indicates decidedly to what con- clusion the town arrived. But the movement failed of a vote. /4 7- r ^ '^'^ O HOU O^ ^^ ^ \ ) i ; Wrenihanici^'' Franklin. R^eprnc/ucec/ an a? uniform scj/6: o /' 72 o rod's /ier /'nc^ /"rorn -^he o/c//mi//s of I4^rer)^harn (t^')<3ncl rr^n/rlin (^y^S) ■ /{o^c/s .r/yoyvn 6y c/ofyec/ //f7es h^t^e dee/i ADDENDA. 67 when a committee of the town recommended its purchase for $3,000. The improvement of the Common, by planting shade trees, laying out walks, etc., is in the hands of a voluntary associ- ation at the present time. V. MAPS OF THE TOWN. The earliest known map of the territory of Franklin is in the town office of Wrentham. It is entitled, "A Plan of the Town of Wrentham. Shewing the Figure and Bounds thereof. Particu- larly of the Westerly Bound and Marks the Scituation of the Ponds, first House Lotts shewn by Jus*. Ware, Eben"" Pusher and others. — — — — Ma}' 1735 pr Sam' Brooks Surv--." This map contains inside its boundaries onl3'the two ponds, two or three short streets and the location and names of the first set- tlers. The outline of the West Precinct is dotted within it, evi- dently at a later date, and is almost exactly coincident with the present boundaries of Franklin. An exact but reduced fac-simile of this ancient map and its contents is given in the accompanying drawing. The original is on a scale of foily chains to the inch. A map of more interest to us is in the archives of the State House at Boston. It is from surveys made by Amos Hawes and Moses Fisher in September, October, and November, 1794, and is dated 27th May, 1795. The subscript says "There is about 17,602 acres in said town and that there are four Ponds which contain 20 acres and a half as laid down on the Plan. The roads in said Franklin are 58f miles in length and two rods in Breadth and contain 221 acres and one-quarter. Charles River on the North is about 5 rods in width and Mine Brook about one rod. The Centre of said Town is Thirty Miles from Boston the Capital of the State and Nineteen Miles from Dedham the Shire Town of the County." A reduced fac-simile of this map is inserted within the map of Wrentham and enclosed within the dotted lines. In 1795, November 2, the selectmen were directed to " procure a plan of the town drawed on Parchment 100 rods to an inch, delin- eating the roads, Ponds, Streams, Houses, and Mills, specifying the distance of every house from- the meeting-house in sd town, the distance of the Town from the Shiretown of the County, the 68 HISTORY OF FRANKLIN. distance from the Capital of the state, the quantity of land in sd town, the surface of water contained in the ponds, and the quan- tity of land contained in the roads. Said plan to be the property of the town, to be lodged in the town clerk's office." No such map is now discoverable in the town office or elsewhere, unless that in the State House be the one intended. In 1830, the State Legislature passed an act requiring the towns to make a survey of their territory. This town responded with a map, surve3'ed by John G. Hales, and lithographed, of which the town bought 200 copies at cost, to be resold at forty-two cents apiece. These went off slowlj', and in 1837 the town voted to sell the balance at auction. Copies of this map of 1832 are still somewhat plenty. No survey of the town has since been made at the town's expense. The maps in the atlas of Norfolk county, of 1876, were issued by subscription of individuals, the town vot- ing, 4th March, 1874, to buy a copy of the atlas at half price for the several public schools. Whether the schools now have a copy, the school committee can probably tell. VI. VOTES ON CIVIL MATTERS. The action of the town as a corporation is rather indicated by its general drift than by its specific votes. But its political sym- pathies are shown in its instructions at different times to its repre- sentatives — many of which are decisive enough — and in its majorities for State and National oflicers. Some votes on particu- lar questions have, therefore, a value in the town's history. In 1778, a new State constitution was submitted to the j^eople. A special committee, of which the minister was chairman, was chosen to examine it, whose report and subsequent discussion led to a non-approval of the instrument. The Concord Convention of 17th July, 1779, was highlv approved of "as calculated to answer the great purpose of appreciating our paper currency," and the prices of commodities as then recommended were adopted. The vote for the State constitution of 1780 was 105. The revised constitution of 1820 experienced a curious reception, decidedly indicative of the independent thinking and acting of the voters. The fourteen articles passed as follows : — ADDENDA. 69 Article 1 20 yeas, 126 nays. Article 2 yeas, 146 nays. Article 3 136 yeas, 7 nays. Article 4 126 yeas, 21 nays. Article 5 71 yeas, 67 nays. Article 6 2 yeas, 138 nays. Article 7 128 yeas, 6 nays. j Article 8 133 yeas, 15 nays. Article 9 91 yeas, 6 nays. Article 10 1 yea, 120 nays. Article 11 100 yeas, 5 nays. Article 12 1 yea, 97 nays. Article 13 104 yeas, nays. Article 14 8 yeas, 101 nays. The amendments of 1833, 1836, and 1840 were passed almost without opposition. Subsequent votes of the town on later amendments indicate the same independent and intelligent judg- ment. The revised constitution of 1853 was rejected on three of its eight general divisions. VII. THE PUBLIC POOR. At the incorporation of the town there were only five paupers in the whole area of Wrentham, two of whom fell to Franklin, and the thrift of the people was such that for many years no mention is made in the records of any need of public provision for the poor. In 1799, regulations were adopted by the town for their care. As the custom then was, they were put out to the lowest bidder ; but the successful bidder must be approved by the selectmen and held strictl}' to furnish all comforts except clothes and medicine, which were supplied by the town, and to remove the poor elsewhei-e at his own expense, on any complaint approved by the selectmen. At this date there were onlj^ five to be so disposed of. In 1835, the dwelling-house and fann were purchased of Mr. Alpheus Adams, for an almshouse, at a cost of $3,000. It contains 125 acres, a two-story dwelling-house, 40x32 feet, a barn 50x26 feet, and other smaller buildings. Since 1835, the number of its inmates has not at au}- time exceeded twelve. In 1868 the almshouse was burned, and the following April the town voted to build another twenty rods farther east. This new building is now in use. VIII. PUBLIC LIBRARY. What is now regarded as a town necessit}^ had hardly an exist- ence outside of colleges a hundred years ago. Franklin was blessed with the donation of a library before it was ten years old, which became the foundation for its present respectable collection of books. 70 HISTORY OF FRANKLIN. The tradition is current that Dr. FrankUn gave a Ubrary in- stead of a bell as had been suggested to him, because he believed such a people must prefer sense to sound. But a diligent search has found no verification of this very probable, characteristic and appropriate remark. But there is a letter of value, the original of which is in the collections of the Maine Historical Society at Brunswick, and a cop}' of which the secretary. Prof. A. S. Pack- ard, has kindh" furnished : — Passy, April 13, 1785. Dear Cousin : I received your letter of Decem'' IG relating to Jonas Hartwell. I had before written to our Minister at Madrid, Mr. Carmichael, requesting him to apply for the Release of that Man. Inclosed I send His answer, with Copies of other Papers relating to the Affair. The Simpleton will be discharged, perhaps after being a little whipt for his Folh', & that may not be amiss. We have here another New England man, Thayer, formerly a can- didate for the Ministry, who converted himself lately at Home, & is now preparing to return home, for the purpose of convert- ing his Countrymen. Our ancestors from Catholics became first, Church of England men, & then, refined into Presbyterians. To change now from Presbyterianism to Poper}', seems to me re- fining backwards, from white sugar to brown. I have written to Dr. Price of London, requesting him to make a choice of proper Books to commence a Library for the use of the Inhabitants of Franklin. They will be sent directly from thence. * * » Your affectionate uncle, B. Franklin. JoKA. Williams, P^sq. This Dr. Price was Rev. Richard Price, a close friend of Dr. Franklin's, who published several strong pamphlets in advocacy of the American cause of liberty, and whom our Congress invited to become a citizen and aid in the financial affiiirs of the government, an invitation whicli he politely declined. It is interesting to stud}' his idea of a proper librar}' for a young Massachusetts town ; and a copy of the original catalogue (printed 178G) is given as a guide thereto : — Clark's Works, 4 vols., folio. Montesquieu's Spirit of Laws, 2 vols. Hoadley's Works, 3 vols., folio. Blackstone's Commentaries, 4 vols. Barrows' Works, 2 vols., folio. Watson's Tracts, 6 vols. Ridgeley's Works, 2 vols., folio. Newton on the Prophesies, 3 vols. Locke's Works, 4 vols., octavo. Law on Religion, 1 vol. Sydney's Works, 1 vol., octavo. Priestley's Institutes, 2 vols. ADDENDA. 71 Priestley's Corruptions, 2 vols. Price and Priestley, 1 vol.* Lyndsey's Apology and Sequel, 2 vols. Abernethy's Sermons, 2 vols. Duchal's Sermons, 3 vols. Price's Morals, 1 vol. Price on Providence, 1 vol. Price on Liberty, 1 vol. Price on the Christian Scheme, 1 vol. Price's Sermons, 1 vol. l^eedham's Free State, 1 vol. West and Littleton on the Resurrec- tion, 1 vol. Stennet's Sermons, 2 vols. Addison's Evidences, 1 vol. •Gordon's Tacitus, 5 vols. Backus' History, 1 vol. Lardner on the Logus, 1 vol., 8vo. "Watts' Orthodoxy and Charity, 1 vol. Brainerd's Life, 1 vol. Bellamy's True Religion, 1 vol. Doddridge's Life, 1 vol. Bellamy's Permission of Sin, 1 vol. Fordyce's Sermons, 1 vol. Hemminway against Hopkins, 1 vol. Hopkins on Holness, 1 vol . Life of Cromwell, 1 vol. Fulfilling the Scriptures, 1 vol. Watts on the Passions, 1 vol. Watts' Logic, 1 vol. Edwards on Religion, 1 vol. Dickinson on the Five Points, 1 vol. Christian History, 2 vols. Prideaux's Connections, 4 vols. Cooper on Predestination, 1 vol. Cambridge Platform, 1 vol. Stoddard's Safety of Appearing, 1 vol. Burkett on Personal Reformation, 1 v. Barnard's Sermons, 1 vol. Shepard's Sound Believer, 1 vol. History of the Rebellion, 1 vol. Janeway's Life, 1 vol. Hopkin's System, 2 vols. American Preacher, 4 vols. Emmons' Sermons, 1 vol. Thomas' Laws of Massachusetts, 1 vol. American Constitutions, 1 vol. Young's Night Thoughts, 1 vol. Pilgrim's Progress, 1 vol. Ames' Oration, 1 vol. Spectators, 8 vols. Life of Baron Trenk, 1 vol. Cheap Repository, 2 vols. Moral Repository, 1 vol. Fitch's Poem, 1 vol. Erskine's Sermons, 1 vol. A few of the smaller ones must have been added from this side the water. A private librar}^ of 125 volumes for the use of the shareholders was added to the Franklin gift soon afterwards. These books were equally substantial. Still, in the dearth of reading of that time, even a folio of sermons was not unattractive, as the present writer can testify. The town had some difficulty in deciding by whom the Library might be used. At first it was limited to members of the parish. In November, 1788, the books were opened to the whole town. In June. 1789,. Mr. Emmons is directed by the town to lend out the books " according to the directions in the letter accompany- ing said library." But that letter has disappeared. In 1790 they are opened '^ to the inhabitants of the town at large until the tow-n shall order otherwise." And so the matter has remained unto the present day. The Congregational pastor has been the -custodian, and sometimes for years uncalled upon to deliver a .book out of the antiquated collection. A committee was chosen 72 HISTORY OF FRANKLIN. in March, 1840, to look after the neglected donation, which they fonnd stowed away in its venerable book-case in a barn. The nltimate result of this and another investigation in 1856, was the forming of a Library Association, to which the town by vote com- mitted the care of the old Franklin and Social libraries. These are now together, and fox'ni a nucleus for annual additions, towards which the town appropriates "the dog money" and $400 per annum. From Libraries we pass naturally to IX. PUBLIC SCHOOLS. Before this precinct was incorporated, in the winter of 1734-5, the first preacher sent amongst its few people was directed also to teach school for four months ; and this arrangement was continued by the town of Wrentham, employing different persons, until the precinct assumed the management of its own affairs. As earl>' as June, 1(585, Wrentham set apart a lot of twent}' to twenty-five acres for the support of schools. In March, 1695, a school-house was voted, sixteen feet square besides the chimney, and in the failure of a teacher, the selectmen kept the school one week each in turn. Among the earliest school teachers were Theodore Man and John Fales. In 1718 four separate schools are ordered, one at each cardinal point of the town. In 1728 the old Wrentham school-house of 1G95 is sold at auction. Feb. 11, 1754, the school lands, which by successive grants had amounted to nearly fifty acres, were, by leave of the court, sold at auction ,^ the twenty-five acres at Stop river being started at £90. In 17G0, the lands between the two ponds (Blake's pond and the Mill pond, now Whiting's), which the Wrentham proprietors had donated to the town 30th January, 1744, on condition that they should be used for schools, were soldb}- order of the town for £158 15s. 8d., of which the west precinct were to have their share " as soon as set off into a town for the same use." What became of the Franklin share of this mone}'^ is not clear from the records. But in 1792, a claim to certain monej-s in the Wrentham treasury was referred to an outside committee — Daniel Perry, John Stone, and Elisha May — who adjudged £33 4s. to the town, a good part of which was absorbed in the costs of get- ting it. ADDENDA. 73 The first grant of money by the town for schools was £200, in May 20, 1778, under the following directions : — Voted that the money granted, to be appropriated for the sup- port of Schools in this town the year ensuing, be and hereby is ordered to be expended in the following manner, viz : the several School Destricts in this town to have the same Bounds and Lim- mits as was usual Before this town was Incorporated, unless in the opinion of the Selectmen some alteration are necessary, which is left to their discretion to make if the}' think proper ; and that some time Before the Last day of June Next the Inhabitants of Each perticular Destrict shall give to the Selectmen the Number of Children Between the Age of four years and sixteen that live in each perticular destrict, and the Selectmen are hereby directed to Divide the School money by the Polls taking the whole number of Children in the town as above Described and ascertain to Each Destrict what Sum they have a Right to Expend, and the Inhabi- tants of Each Destrict shall have Liberty to hire School Masters, or Mistress, or both, they being such as shall be approved by the Selectmen to keep school in their Perticular District until their shair of the money is Expended. Provided the same be Accom- plished Before the Last Day of June 1779. — and in case any Dis- trict shall Neglect to Expend their part of the money by the time Perfixt without a sufficient Excuse to the Satisfaction of the Selectmen, the Remainder not Expended as aforesaid shall Re- main in the Treasury for the use of such a school as the town shall afterward order. One year later, May 19, 1779, the sum of £400 was granted for support of schools, with a similar vote as to mode of expend- ing the same. In 1780 the grant was £800. These sums were in a currency known as the " old emission," and of depreciated value. In 1781 the grant was £200, of new emission ; but in 1782 the grant was reduced to £80. The grants from year to year were about the same in amount until A. D. 1796, when the sum of $320 was granted, which amount was gradually increased until A. D. 1802, when $500 was granted. In 1814 $600 was granted, and in 1823 it was raised to$700. The grant for schools in 1839 was $1,000; in 1855, $1,600, and in 1862 the sum of $1,750 was granted and apportioned to the sev- eral schools, in accordance with the recommendation of a special committee. In 1865 $2,500 was granted, and in 1868 $4,000 was. the sum granted, and the town voted to establish a High SchooL 74 HISTORY OF FRANKLIN. In 1873 the grant was raised to $6,000, which amount has been continued to the present time.* These grants have had various methods of subdi\4sion. From 1778 until 1812 it was divided according to the number of children between four and sixteen, excepting in 1792, 1795 to 1797, when the division was by families. In 1813, and mainly until the aboli- tion of the district system, the distribution has been one-half by the number of families, and one-half^ b}' the number of children. In 1789 it was voted that any district neglecting to make return of the number of school children at a fixed time should forfeit its portion of the appropriation. The employment of teachers had been for many years entrusted to the selectmen. Afterwards, the teachers must be approved by the selectmen, but chosen b}' the districts. Next, the town appointed prudential committees to secure teachers. In 1827 the several districts were authorized to choose their own committees, and this became an annual vote, so far as appears, while the dis- tricts continued. At first the clergyman annually visited and catechised the schools, and it was a great day when the catechising came. It usually came in Ma}'. Notice was given on the Sabbath of the intended place and hour, and promptly gathered the freshl3'-washed and brushed scholars with their new summer apparel. The mo- ment the well-known chaise appeared the noise of fift}' children ceased, and each glided into a seat in silent, waiting expectation for the incoming of the minister. Everv scholar arose as he en- tered the room, and stood until he reached the desk. After a ver}^ short prayer they sat, and he began here or there as his eye chanced to fall, until every child had told his own and his parents' names, and had answered or failed to answer some question from the assembl3''s catechism. Some of the abashed ones' misquota- tions caused even the grave man in black to smile. It has been told, for example, that a lad, very bashful by na- ture and unusually tall for his years, had timidly doubled himself upon a low seat. AVhen called up in his turn he slowly rose and waited, blushing and abashed at his short name and awkward height. Quickly, as the liev. Doctors' manner was, came the * See Report of School Committee for 1877. ADDENDA. 75 question, " Can you say the Lord's prayer?" "The — Lord's — Prayer," slowly stammered the confused youth, and gradually slid himself together again, like a telescope, back to his seat. It was a difficult moment for solemnity. These annual catechisings continued far into the present cen- tury and nearly unto the end of the reverend pastor's ministry, and until a sharper definition of the public school and the school committee came into full otiicial position. The first committee was chosen by the town in March, 1802. A list of the incumbents up to the present time is appended, with other town officers. The first report preserved in the town records dates March, 1810. Subsequently they are frequently copied by vote of the town. The}' generally and sometimes vigorously discuss the importance and requirements of popular education, and are not seldom ac- cepted with a vote of thanks from the town. The estabUshinent of school boundaries and the location of school-houses has been determined by the wants of the children. At first, a central school had to supply all. Before the separation from Wreutham others had been estal)lished. In 1791 liberty was given to the overflow of any district to attend any school in town where the teacher could conveniently receive them. In Jan- uary, 1795, a committee was instructed to report upon the needed number of school-houses, and where they should be located. In January. 1795. a committee was instructed to report upon the needed number of school-houses and where they should be located. In November following their report is received, recommending six districts and as many school-houses — namely, at River End, at Long AValk division, at Maj. Moses Knapp's division, " where it now is," at Capt. Asa Fairbanks', "not more than twentj' rods from Mine Brook," at Dea. James Metcalf s division, and at the meeting-house "on the East side of the way from the meeting- house to Mr. Emmons', near the corner of Hezekiah Fisher's land." But in 1800 these divisions suffered a rearrangement more in accordance with their after boundaries, and their names were changed to geographical designations. In 1822 the River End district was divided, and other divisions occurred until the number of schools was increased to ten — the present number of mixed schools. The central school, however, is graded into four departinents and six schools, with a total attendance the current 76 HISTORY OF FRANKLIN. year of 314. The number of attending school children in town is 572. The materials are not discoverable for an}- particular notice of the " red school-houses," which once illuminated the cross-roads of the town. Their places have been filled by far more conven- ient and sightly buildings, erected b}' the town after the abolition of the district system. But of the present buildings there is no need of mention. The public schools, insufficient in length for the demands of the people, wei'e often prolonged by private subscriptions ; and many scholars annually resorted to Day's Academ}'^, in Wrentham, for higher instruction, especially in the classics for a college course. A graduate occasionally taught an extra term in the autumn. Requests from several persons encouraged the present writer to attempt a private school of a higher grade at his own charges, in the fall of 1835, after his graduation from Amherst College. The central district kindly offfered the use of its school-house. The tuition was placed at twenty-five and thirty-three cents per week, and a High School was opened with fifty-six scholars, of whom fourteen came from other towns. With such encouragement the school continued for several years, and with a constantly increas- ing patronage, until its term rolls counted sometimes nearly- a hun- dred names. Within the first 3'ear of its existence a large two- story building was erected b}- a stock company, with accommoda- tions for a hundred pupils, recitation-rooms, a large hall for pub- lic examinations, apparatus, etc. During the three years of the first principal's connection, this school counted on its roll the names of many scholars since well known and not a few renowned as educators and heads of import- ant institutions of instruction, as well as lawj-ers, physicians and ministers. A review of its first three catalogues is now to the writer a frequent and pleasant exercise, and the occasional meet- ing of old scholars a delightful revival of some of the brightest daj'S of his life. The subsequent career of the old Franklin High School, under Bigelow, Baker and others is not particularly known to the writer. Upon its subsidence, the building was occupied as a store, and is now fitted for dwellings. But though its cupola and bell are gone, and its front pillars and recess have disappeared, a halo of kindly ADDENDA. 77 memories will linger about it still, at the western foot of the Com- mon, as long as the 3'oang eyes of 1835-40 can look upon its site. A HIGH SCHOOL was established b}' the town in April, 1868, and was oj^ened to pupils on May 20, with twenty-two scholars, and Miss Mary A. Bryant as principal. Since the close of her service the line of principals has been Annie E. Patten, Thomas Curie}', and Lucien I. Blake, the present occupant of the position. The educational facilities of Franklin have been especially en- larged l\y the founding of DEAN ACADEMY. We condense from its annual catalogues. " At the annual session of the Massachusetts Universalist Convention, held in Worcester, Oct. 18-20, 1864, the subject of a State denominational school, which should be of the highest grade below that of colleges, was brought to the attention of the council by Rev. A. A. Miner, D. D., President of Tuft's College. The council immediately appointed a, committee with full discretionary powers, with Rev. A. St. John Ohambre, of Stoughton, as chairman. This committee soon held a spirited public meeting in Boston. The parish in Stoughton offered $25,000 and an ehgible site. Oliver Dean, M. D., of Frankhn, proposed to give a tract of eight or nine acres which he had bought of the former estate of Rev. N. Emmons, D. D., $10,000 towards a building, and $50,000 as a permanent fund. Dr. Dean's proj^osal was accepted, a charter obtained, trustees chosen, and a call for funds for building issued. The generous responses encouraged the trustees to secure plans for a seminary adequate to the apparent demands, and ground was broken in August, 1866. May 16, 1867, the corner- stone was laid with appropriate public ceremonies. The continual rise of prices of labor and material compelled to increased sub- scriptions, Dr. Dean's donations to the building arising to about $75,000. The edifice was finished and dedicated to its uses May 28, 1868, with a dedicatory address by Rev. E. C. Bolles of Port- land, Me. The total cost of the building, exclusive of furniture and gas apparatus, was about $154,000. It was 220 feet front, the main center fifty feet by sixty deep, and two wings, each fifty- 78 HISTORY OF FRANKLIN. eight feet by forty-four in deptli, with still other wings projecting into the rear, and three stories high. The st^ie was French Lom- bardic and altogether was a ver}- appropriate and beautiful edifice. While the acadeni}' was being erected a school was begun, Oct. 1, 1866, in the vestr}' of the Universalist church, with forty- four pupils, under Mr. T. G. Senter as principal. The school was removed to the new edifice at the opening of the summer term of 1868. But during the night of July 31, 1872, this magnificent building with nearly all its contents was destroyed by fire. The friends of the school, however, speedily rallied from this sudden and stun- ning blow and began as soon as possible to rebuild upon the for- mer foundations. The school meanwhile was continued with en- couraging prospects in the Franklin House, which had been purchased by the trustees and citizens of the town for this purpose It was with great labor and many anxieties that the trustees pushed forward the work in their care. Desirous of furnishing the best facilities for education, they incorporated every improve- ment into their new building, and with so much success that they were able to present it for public dedication on June 24, 1874, and for class graduation exercises — less than two years from the destruction of its predecessor. The school removed to it the next term — September, 1874. The present building occupies substantially the same dimensions and diflTers externall}' very little from the previous one, except in architectural style, being Gothic. The internal arrangements arfr not surpassed by any other educational institution in the State ;. while its exterior brick walls, banded and corniced with sandstone, and rising to a fifth story in the center, with a lofty tower sixty feet high, add a feature to the beautiful scenery which attracts and holds the eye of every visitor with admiration of its chaste yet impressive proportions. A view is given on the opposite page. Dean Academy continued open to both sexes until 1877, when a demand for a j'oung ladies' school in the Universalist church de- cided the trustees to open the institution for young ladies only. Under this new departure it began the fall term of the present year, 1877-8, with about fifty pupils. There is not yet sufficient time to test the present policy. But the trustees say " th& promise is that the school will be eminently successful in the ADDENDA. 79 work it has undertaken. It will continue to be Jirst. class in every respect, and to furnish a thorough education." Next to the school, as one of the educational agencies of a town, may come a brief notice of X. THE POST-OFFICE. This is furnished chiefl}^ b}' Capt. H. C. Fisher, now of Haver- hill. There was no properl}' appointed post-office until about 1819, The few newspapers and occasional letters for the first century of the settlement came b}' chance neighborl}- hands from Wrent- ham, where they were left by the carriers between Providence and Boston. As late as 1812 the}' were brought from South Wrentham on Saturda3-s and left at Capt. Nathaniel Adams' store (after Davis Thayer's). Ilermon C. Fisher, then about 15, was emploj'ed as carrier by several families. As there were but three mails per week between Boston and Providence, the weekl}^ amount for Franklin was not a heavy horse-back load. But the interest in the events of the war of 1812 paid for the long weekly journey through Wrentham Center and Guinea, to the old tavern on the Boston and Providence road. About 1815, David Fisher, keeper of the onl}' tavern then in Wrentham, was appointed postmaster, and the Franklin mail was brought from there ; but North Frank- lin letters came from Captain Felt's office, recently opened in Medwa}' Village. About 1819, Eli Richardson built the stone store at City Mills in Franklin and secured a post-office there. As there was some business rivalry between the Center and the City, of which Davis Thaj'er and Eli Richardson were the expo- nents respectively, the Center was not pleased that a march had been stolen upon them. True, Mr. Richardson engaged to bring all letters and papers which belonged to the Center to meeting in his sulky box ever}- Sunda}-, and H. C. Fisher took the package from the carriage to Major Tha3^er's store for distribution ; but the letters sometimes miscarried, the inventory charges did not agree, and after two uneasy years the Center moved in earnest for a post-office of its own. The result of a somewhat bitter conflict was the securing of an office, with Davis Thaj'er as post- master, and David Metcalf as mail-carrier twice a week from the city to the Center. He came regularly with his pouch, but as Mr. 80 HISTORY OF FRANKLIN. Richardson still kept the keys, nothing came of it. After a deal of negotiating with the Department, quiet and order finally ob- tained, and in 1822 the office became regularly established as " Franklin, D. Thayer, P. M." From that date the succession of postmasters has been Spencer Pratt, Theron C. Hills, David P. Baker, Cj'rus B. Snow, Charles W. Stewart, D. P. Baker again, A. A. llusseque assistant, Smith Fisher, J. A. AVoodward occu- pant since 1871. The office has been as movable as the incum- bent, being held in any most convenient store at the Center. The income at first did not exceed $50 per quarter, of which the postmaster received about thirty per cent., but its business in- creased rapidly as soon as differences were composed. In 1864 a salary was affixed of $480 per annum, in 1866 at $540, and in 1868 at $700. In 1869 the office became a money-order office, and in 1870 the salary raised to $900, and in 1872 to $1,000. XI. ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY. The early ecclesiastical history of Franklin has been mainly embodied in the preceding address. A still fuller sketch of it is contained in the Centennial Sermon of Rev. Elam Smalley, in 1838, which leaves ver}' little to be added except some notice of the regularly settled pastors of the FIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH. Rev. Elias Haven, the first minister, was a native of Framing- ham. He descended from Richard Haven of the West of Eng- land, who settled in Lj'un in 1645, and had twelve children. Moses, his youngest son, born in Lj-nn 20th Ma}', 1667, mar- ried Mary Ballard, and had eight children. He moved to Framing- ham before 1705, and was deacon in 1717. Joseph, his oldest son, born 8th Februar}', 1689, married Martha Haven, and had eleven children. He moved to Hopkinton in 1724; was one of the founders of the church there and its deacon. He filled the highest offices in town. Elias, the third son and child of Joseph, was born in Framing- ham, 16th April, 1714 ; graduated at Harvard 1733, and dismissed from the church in Hopkinton, 29th October, 1738, to become the pastor of the church in Franklin. He married Mary Messenger, oldest daughter of Rev. Henry Messenger of Wrentham (bom ADDENDA. 81 28th August, 1722) aud had seven children. Rev. Mr. Messen- ger's family was a peculiarl}^ ministerial household. His daughter Esther married Rev. Amariah Frost, first minister of Milford ; Sarah married first Dr. Cornelius Kollock of A\'rentham, and sec- ond Rev. Benjamin Caryl, first minister of Dover ; while Elizabeth was the wife of Rev. Joseph Bean, her father's successor, aud his son James was the first minister in Ashford, Ct. Four only of Rev. Mr. Haven's seven children reached ma- turity. These were : — 2. Thomas, born 28th August, 1744, for whose histor}^ see biographical sketches. 3. Elias, born 11th November, 1745, married Elizabeth Bright of Dedham, and probably' removed there. 6. William, born 20th June, 1751. of whom nothing more is known. 7. Mary, born Ma}', 1753, and lived in Dedham. Rev. Mr. Haven's ministrj' , continued through much weakness of body and frequent suspensions, was very successful in results. One hundred and seventy-one members were added to the church during his sixteen years, most of them during the great revival of 1741. But consumption early marked him for a victim, and the last five years of his life were broken by long intervals of in- ability to preach. The records of the church and the parish show the devotion of the people by their frequent S3'mpathetic votes and cheerful continuance of his salar}-, while they suppUed the pulpit at their own expense, and a grant of £26 to his family after his death. The town erected a stone over his grave in the ^central yard, on which they sa}- : — Who are desirous of giving And of perpetuating Their public Testimony To his faithful ministry and pious Life By which tho' dead he yet speaketh To his once beloved and grateful Flock. Rev. Caleb Barnam, or Baknum, the second pastor, was of Danbmy, Ct. His immigrant ancestor, Thomas Barnum, was first •of Fairfield, then in Norwalk, and afterwards one of eight original settlers of Danbury ; where Caleb was born 30th June, 1737, the son of Thomas and Deborah. He graduated at Princeton, IS". J., 1757, and A. M. in 1768 at both Princeton and Harvard. 6 82 HISTORY OP FRANKLIN. Mr. Biinium began bis ministiy iii this tOAvn in troublous tiines^ induced, nia^^be, by the six years' vacanc}^ in the pastorate, and continued perhaps by tlie hymn-book war and known decisiveness of FrankUn people. The minister, it nuist be admitted, was also prompt and positive in his opinions, and not therefore skillfully successful in adjusting the ditlerenees of others. Yet he carried with him the confldeuce and support of a large majority of the church, and it was with great reluctance and xevj slowly' that they consented to his resignation. The records of the time seem to show that the ditt'erenees were more between the precinct and the church than with the minister. He, as a central figure between them, received the attacks of both parties, and as ustially results, he was demolished in their encounters. A communication from the precinct to the church. ado[)ted 12th March, 1764. illustrates the above statement : — We have had Yours of ye Tweh-e of February' under considera- tion and have Left it to be more fully answered by Capt. Jn. Golds- bury, and others, a Committee Chosen at a Pro. meeting on ye (> of February aunodomimi 1764. But Can bj- no means C!oncur with you in singing either Doct. Watts vertion of the Psalms, or Tate & Brady's with the Hymns. But do still adhear to our vote of ye 21 of June, 17G2, and Desire ye Church would Concur with us in Singing the Old Version of 3'e Psalms in ye Congregation ; Leaving the church to thear Own Choree to Sing What Version of Psalms they Please when the}' assemble by themselves for Divine Worship, but if the Church shall not think Proper to Concur with ye Precinct in Singing the Old Version of the Psalms, That you would proceed to Send out ye Letters missive to the churches Chosen to Set in Ecclesiastical Council to hear and advise us un- der our Difficulties and that the Precinct Clerk wate upon ye Rev. Mr. Baruam with a Coppy of this Vote and with a Coppy of the Votes of the Precinct Past at precinct meeting on the 6 of Febru- ary 1764, Desiring they may be Laid before the Church as Soon as may be with Convenience'. The council alluded to was convened 17th April, 1764, and its result accepted 7th Maj-, and expense of council, £6. lis. 2 d., paid by the precinct. That result sajs : — We look upon that which the church acted in voting another version of the Psalms difterent from what the Christian assembly in this Parish from their original foundation had been in the pub- lic use of without their consulting the Congi'egation was xmadvis- edlj' done. Forasmuch as the whole of the religious society are ADDENDA. 8S evidently interested therein. Notwithstanding we think the Pre- cinct were very assuming in Pretending to settle sd controverted point by a Parish vote and demanding or requesting the church's concurrence, forasmuch as consistent with our congregational con- stitution it has always been considered as the church's right to go before in matters of divine worship, and in regard to many con- curring circiunstances attending the church's vote of introducing Dr. Watts' version we are of opinion that it is advisable that the congregation rather acquiesce in said vote and sing the version of Dr. AVatts in part together with our New^ England version in part ; which version said congregation have Lately assaid to Revive, and that, considering the uncomfortable and unhappy state which must attend the people in maintaining controversies of this kind, we adAise the Rev. Pastor and church to condescend thereto for the Present, that ye may all have an opportunity, hoping withal in in due time 3'ou'll improve it that 3"e maj' all unite in one version. The h3'mual discord was accompanied by other troubles to the pastor. Some withdrew on suspicion of his unsoundness ' ' on the doctrine of universal redemption and assurance of faith," and several left to attend Separatist meetings ; but the majorit}' of the church vindicated the pastor and rebuked the dissentients. Still, Mr. Barnum persisted in pressing his dismissal, until it was reluctantly granted. In his ministry of eight years, forty were added to the church by profession and eight b}' letter. Mr. Barnum was installed over the first church in Taunton, 2d Februar}', 1769. When the news of the fight at Lexington reached Taunton, he enthusiasticall}'^ addressed his people upon the duties of the crisis, and himself entered the army of the patriots, 3d May, 1775, and was chaplain of the Twenty-fourth Regiment, Col. John Greaton, then near Boston, 10th February, 1776. He followed his regiment to New York and to Montreal. On his retui'n he was taken sick at Ticonderoga and was discharged 24th July. But death arrested him at Pittsfield on the 23d of August, at the age of 39. Mr. Barnum was a full}^ proportioned man of over six feet in height and of "vigorous muscle, which, if tradition be reliable, he did not decline to use when occasion demanded ; as when he once took down a blatant wrestler who had made himself obnoxious. A portrait preserved of him presents a very majestic and author- itative presence in his ample wig. Mr. Barnum married 13th June, 1761, Priscilla, daughter of 84 HISTORY OF FRANKLIN. Rc'A'. Caleb like, of Sturbridge, and sister to Col. Nathan Rice, of Ilingham. aid-de-camp to General Lincoln, in the Southern cam- paign. The}- had eight children : — 1. Caleb, born 11th April, 17G2, and married Nancy Paine, of Thetford, Vt. 2. Priscilla, born 1st April, 17G4, and married Capt. David Vickery, of Taunton. 3. Deborah, born 27th October, 1766, and married Thomas S. Bailies, of Dighton. 4. George, born 23d May, 17G8, and married Sally Cutler, of Warren. 5. Mary, died young. 6. Thomas, born 30th October, 1772 and married Sally Abra- ham, of New York. 7. Anna, born 30th December, 1773. and married Rufus Child, of Woodstock, Ct. 8. Polh'. born 11th October, 1775, and married Rev. Peter Nourse, of Ellsworth, Me. Of the third minister. Rev. Nathanael Emmons, D. D., a portrait is given as he was at about 60 years of age. The ex- haustive memoir by Prof. E. A. Park, D. D., has left nothing for addition or correction. It is no dubious commendation of his character and ministry that his name is still a brightness in the memory of all the elder citizens of Franklin, and even mellowed into a sunnier radiance b}' the lapse of years. So strong was the regard to him personall}' that his namesakes are found in mam' a family and in man^' a town and State, while anecdotes of him and his pithy apothegms are still current — bright as new coin, and more valuable. We find him a member, and often the chairman, of important committees chosen b}- the town on matters of moral interest. Yet he was never a dictator, but carried the public mind by his clear and convincing logic. He sharpened the intel- lects of his people and made them alert, discriminating and clear- headed thinkers, having settled opinions of their own. He ruled, therefore, only by always moving in the line of their own intelligent convictions. They knew him to be simply following truth and they had to follow his guidance, because he justified every step of his waj'. In cue aspect, at least, Dr. Emmons has been and is sometimes ADDENDA. 85 still misrepresented. He was not curt, dogmatic, andre pellant. He was not imsocial and austere to his people, nor a bugbear to the young. But he invited and received us cordially into his study, drew us out of our bashfulness, and always dismissed us with new thoughts and higher impulses. He was affable, genial, and enjoyed a joke as keenly as any of us. The young people of his day still remember his indescribable chuckle with which he followed his salUes of wit. He loved to test us with Socratic questions, and highly enjoyed our escapes from entanglements ; and herein lay his power over our generation. He won our con- fidential regard and never wrenched it afterwards by the tension of am' inconsistent demands. The writer hopes to be pardoned for adding so much in vindication of the aged pastor who stimu- lated him as well as so many others in the pursuit of education and whom some who never knew him have painted as distant, morose, and forbidding in manners. It is a slander on the man. Dr. Emmons' active ministry continued about fifty-four years —from 21st April, 1773, to 28th May, 1827. He died 23d Sep- tember, 1840, at nearly 9G. He often said that he should never have ventured to settle over the Franklin church — so vigor- ously divided in feeling — if Mr. Niles had not just before him preached to that people his two sermons with such effect during his supply of the Frankhn pulpit. One sermon was from the text, ' • I ask for what intent ye have sent for me ? " wherein he de- scribed the objects for which some people wanted a minister, and the proper business of the ministry. The other sermon was on the text, " I hear that there are divisions among you," in which their discords and their consequences were plainl}' and faithfully set forth. Twice during his ministr}', in 1781 and again in 1781, Dr. Em- mons, discouraged with his apparentl}^ fruitless labors, asked a dismission, which his people unanimously declined to grant. An extensive and powerful revival followed before the latter year closed, from which about seventy were added to the church. It was the end of his discouragements. During his active life 308 were gathered into the church. His letter of resignation, after his fainting in the pulpit, is worthy, for its loving simpUcity, of a place in this history : — gg HISTORY OF FRANKLIN. Fkanklix. May 28, 1827. To the Members of the Church and to the Members of the Religious Society in this Place. Brethren «fc Friends : I have sustained the Pastoral ReUitiou to vou for more than fifty years, which is a long ministerial life. The decays of nature and increasing infirmities of old age and my present feeble state of health convince me that it is my duty to retire from the field of labor which 1 am no longer able to occupy to my own satisfaction, nor to your benefit. I therefore take the liberty to inform you that I can no longer supply your pulpit and perform any ministerial labor among you ; and at the same time that I renounce all claims upon you for any future ministerial sup- port, relying intirelv on vour wisdom and goodness to grant or not to grant any gratuity to your aged servant during the residue of his life. ' ^ ' Nathakael Emmons. The parish responded with a grant of $500 per annum. Dr. Emmons was descended from Samuel Emmons of Cambridge, and was the son of Dea. Samuel, Jr., and lluth (Cone) Emmons of East Haddam. Ct. He was born 1st May, 1745, and gradu- ated at Yale College 1767. He married, fii'st. Deliverance French of Braintree, 6th April, 1775. She died 22d June, 1778, and her two children in Septem- ber. Second, Martha Williams, of Hadley, 4th November, 1779, by whom he had six children. 1. Martha, wife of Willard Gay, Esq., of Dedhani. 2. Deliverance. 3. Sarah. 4. Mary, wife of Rev. Jacob Lie, D. D.. of Medway. who is still living with her husband in a serene old age, and the mother of two sons in the ministry — Revs. Jacob, Jr., and Alexis W. Ide. 5. Williams, B. U. , 1805. Lawyer in Augusta, Me., Senator and Judge of Probate. 6. Erastus. Major, aid-de-camp to General Crane ; died young. Mrs. Emmons died 2d August, 1829. and he married, third, Mrs. Abigail M. Mills of Sutton, 18th September, 1831, who lived to be over 90. A view of the home of Dr. Emmons in Franklin is inserted here, as perhaps the most suitable. - It stood on the north corner of Main and Emmons streets. The old button-wood tree near his study windows is still flourishing, as well as two apple trees on its western side ; but the house itself was removed some years i"ifcfe>r''.'fc ' , 3 o- ADDENDA. 07 ago, and now does duty as a tenement-house, as historic buildings are wont to do in our hurrjing age. Rev. El AH Smalley, D. I)., was settled as the successor — not colleague — of Dr. Emmons, 17th June, 1829. After a nine years' pastorate, he was dismissed 5th July, 1838, to take charge of the Union church, Worcester, where he was installed September 19. He remained here until 1853. when he was dismissed to go to the Fourth Presbyterian church in Troy, N. Y. He was compelled by ill health to I'elinquish this charge not long after. But a voy- age to P'urope failed to restore him, and he died verj^ soon after his return, in New York city, oOth July, 1858, at the early age of 58. Dr. Smalley was a native of Dartmouth. He succeeded by his own exertions in fitting for college, and graduated at Brown Univer- sity 1827, and Doctor of Divinity 1849. He studied theology with Rev. Otis Thompson, of Rehoboth, supporting himself as he had •done in college by teaching singing-schools, in which he was sin- gularl}' adept. Dr. Smalley married Louisa J., daughter of Gen. Abiel and Elizabeth Washburn, of Middleboro, and left two chil- dren, Louisa Jane, for several years teacher of music in the Wheaton Female Seminar^', Norton, now resident in Boston, and George W. (See notices of graduates.) Mrs. Smalley died at Middleboro 7th June, 1874. and was l)uried b}' the side of her husband in Tro}-, N. Y. Dr. Smalley's ministr}' in this town, though following the long and thorough fidelity and renown of Dr. Enunons, was still most pleasant and prosperous. It was confessedly his happiest pasto- rate, and the survivors of his people lament to this daj'that he did not see it his duty to remain in the country parish where all were so read}' to do him honor. His memor}' is still cherished with tender affection in the families that knew of his suave and gra- cious manners without as well as within the pulpit. Rev. Tertius Dunning Southworth was installed the fifth pastor of the church, 23d January, 1839, and was dismissed 25th April, 1850, after a ministr}' of eleven j-ears. Mr. Southworth was son of Rev. James and Mary (Dennison) Southworth, pastor of the Congregational church, Bridgewater, N. Y., and descendant of Constant Southworth, of Pl^'mouth, whose mother, Alice, was wife of the Sir Richard Southworth, 88 IIIST« hc^ studied theology in I'liiKMiton, N. .1., and, after sn|)plying Hie jmlpit a ye.ar in Manslic^ld, he; was ordained in Natick, 17tli.Iiily, l.s.",|». In May, 1850, was dismisHcd, .and on December I following was settled in I^'raiiklin. After fonrteiMi years of good sc-rvice he was dismissed in IHO'L He n(!xt, entered the 8ei*vice of the American Missionary AsHociation, in establish- ing scliools among Freedmeii. He became! aHSoeiated in 1HG8 with Hon. Henry Wilson, aftcsrwards Vice-1'resident, and his for- mer parishionei'. He w;is his piiv.ate seei'elaiy, and aided liini in l>reparing his work, ''TIh; Kise and J'':ill of (he Slave I'owc^r in America," and edited the last volume after Mr. Wilson'H deccKwe. ADDENDA. 89' Mr. Hunt married lirst Mary, daughter of JVIaj. .7 oseph Foster, of Southampton, L. 1. ; afterwards Abigail B., daugiiter of Willis Fisher, of Franklin; and third Mrs. Homer, widow of Samuel Homer, Esq., of Boston. He has living a son and two daughters, of his first wife. Since tliis page was written Mr. Hunt lias died in Boston, 23d July, 1H78. Rev. Geokoe A. Peltox was called by tlus churcli, 18th May, 1865, and was installed Dth August, as appears by the records of the church, for one year. But Uq continued more than a year, until he withdrew for a A\^estern field. The years 18G7-9 he spent in Bethel, Ct. Thence he went, in l.y the 15th of Aprd next. 1 <»b. December 31st 'it is voted to sell the pews at pnbhc vendue to the hrvtlst bidde as per plan, and to bid for choices, each pew So be the pnrchascr-s property, his heirs and assrgns fo - houseTe clapboarded with the best sawed cla,^30.ards, sh.ng d S white-pine shingles, and enclosed with Is. 8d. Cash on hand, in the treasury 24 lis. 6d. The total is not given in the report and for good reason ; for these State notes and Emission bills gave the town no small trouble, and their fiuctuating value prevented any reliable estimate of the amount of the ministerial fund. In 17i)6 the town pre- sented a petition to the General Court that it '-pa}' the bills of New Emission & the Treasurer's note as promised by Act of 24 April, 1780, & to be redeemed in silver by 31 Nov. 1786." But they had leave to withdraw, not the money, but themselves, and nothing more is recorded of the matter iintil 1800. June 25 of this year the treasurer reports the full account of the fund to date to be $760. r)8, besides some interest, also the Emission bills for |>I, 091, note in new Emission $400 — discount and deficit of ^$89.92. A vigorous instruction was given to the Representative, which was ordered to be printed in ''Young & Mime's State paper," whatever that was. A report on this new Emission matter was also presented, which says : — 106 HISTORY OF FRANKLIN. TheGeneral Court in May, 1781, levied a tax of £374,795 8s. 2d. on the towns. Franklin got an abatement of £205 6s. 5d., equal to $684,40. Hard mone}' was so needed that the State ordered Bills to be emitted at 1^ paper for one of silver, which bill was passed a month after the Bills, stopping passing, and therefore were only security for payment. But Government made no pro- vision for payment until 17U4, and then at one-quarter the nomi- nal value, while other securities were funded at full value.* The town received al)out 1284 paper dollars for 684 of silver, and if their bills were funded according to the funding law of 1794, it would have a note of $321 and interest, and lose $363 and inter- est for 18 years. In May, 1803, the town sold the Emission bills, State note, etc., to John Whiting for an unmentioned amount, when the fund was reported to be $1,826.63. In May, 1804, it was $1,427.15^. In March, 1806, it was voted to sell all the 6 per cent, stock in the Loan otHce, Boston. Upon the'separation of parochial business from the town affairs in 1804, the ministerial fund disappears from the records and hides itself almost entirely from sight. Our next glimpse of it is in a deed of ' ^ twenty-six acres of land b}' measurement " lying in Leices- ter, Addison county, Vt., dated 15th June, 1813, and valued at $916. The deed is from John Whiting of Franklin to the First Congregational Society of Franklin, and is quitclaimed to the parish 11th April, 1814, by Joseph Capron of Leicester, Yt. This land proved somewhat of an elephant to the parish. A fre- quent correspondence was carried on between Harvy Deming of Salisbury and H. C. Fisher of the parish committee. The former seems to have been agent for the sale of the land, and tinalh' takes it himself, but the net proceeds to the parish are not distinctly given — they seem to have been about $450. The records of the church throw some additional light upon this fund, for the church had been a contributor to the same end.f In 1790, November 25, the church committee is authorized to re- *The town records refer to Rev. Dr. Hemminway"s election sermon of 1784, for its facts and arguments. t As early as 1761 the first church in Wrentham had given to the second church several acres of the old Dedham lands, viz.: twenty-six acres on Blake's plain; thirty-three acres south of Tare Briel Hill; forty acres east of Millbrook; and eighteen and one-half acres east of Diamond Hill. These lands were some of them exchanged for other lots and finally sold. ADDENDA. 107 loan its money to the United States Loan ofHce and deliver the securities to the church treasurer. In 1808, September 21, the church votes to sell these securities to private parties. In 1832 a committee of the church report the fund to consist of nine notes, amounting to $617, on interest, and cash on hand 8204.40. Total, $820.81. Out of this fund small sums were from time to time appropriated to cases of special need ; for example, $100 was voted, 19th May, 1831, to Rev. Mr. Smalley "to make up the sum proposed to be raised by his friends for his benefit." This was to aid him in building his house. The whole fund was finally dis- posed of by a vote of the church 7th September, 1840, "' to fur- nish the First Congi-egational parish with the funds of the church, amounting to $700 and upwards, to be expended in repairing their meeting-house — to be rented for their current expenses, provided the parish pay the interest to Dr. Emmons during his life, and a joint voice in the settlement and dismission of ministers and the use of the meeting-house as heretofore." So ended all ministerial funds in Frankhn, in securing the use of the meeting-house and a joint voice in ministerial questions. One idea of the moral history' of Frankhn will be best rounded out by sundry votes and resolves of the church, and the town passed at divers times upon the XIII. PUBLIC MORAJ.S. As the main intent of the original settlement was the gathering of a Christian community, the settlers sedulously watched all so- cial tendencies, and felt it not foreign to their duty to express themselves positively upon the practices of society. So long as church membership was essential to citizenship they could have control, and church discipline could be vigorousl}" administere'd. Absentees from public worship were called up for self-justification, and all wanderers had to rise and explain. Even the young Puri- tans were sharply looked after. In 1744, September 12, the precinct chose a man ' • to take care of ye children to prevent their playing in meeting " — an office which lasted within our recollec- tion, and was not a sinecure on summer da^'s. But the Revolutionary War greatly aggravated the growing lax- ity of manners, insomuch that a " Society for the Reformation of Morals" was formed in November, 1790, which had its annual 108 HISTORY OF FRANKLIN. sennon. Several of these were printed for general circulation,* And not without result. The town took note of the general tendency of things, as the following votes witness : — Maj^, 1791, on complaint that divers persons have from time to time behaved in a very unbecoming manner l)y standing in the porches of the meeting-house of this town on the Lord's day and •otherways conducting in a manner not only inconsistent with the purpose for which they {irofessedly assemble, but liighlv unbecom- ing a person of good breeding or the character of a gentleman ; voted that such conduct ought to be highly reprobated and dis- ■countenanced b}' every sober man, and that they will hold them ■SLS scandalous and infamous persons, and the tithing-men are to take their names and publicl}- expose them next town meeting, and post up this vote and the names of all future offenders.! The i)ublic exposure did not wholly eradicate the evil, for in 1794, April 7, it was voted that " all heads of families be re- quested to use their influence and autliority to all under their care to pass the porches on the Sabbath with decency and propriety, without standing in said porches and thereby prevent persons from taking their seats in the meeting-house." One provocative to that evil practice doubtless was the fact that no shade or shelter, save the horse-sheds, existed around the old meeting-house to cover the early comers to church, and the social instinct drew strongly upon those who seldom saw any one during the week to secure the current gossip of the town. The prelimi- nary waiting, therefore, for " the little man in black" to drive up to the front door was spent in retailing the news of the week, and '•• the porches" were the most com fortal)le rendezvous. But this is a solution and not an apology. This outer disrespect was not excluded always, CAcn wlien the congregation had assembled into its famil}' boxes. The minister did not always control their attention. Indeed, he felt that they needed a sharper admonition than a paper resolve, and he resorted to a rousing experiment. On the Sunday' of July 18, 1790, while *See Emmon'vS Works (last ed.) vol. v, p. 2.3 aud on. tThe town had erected two posts in front of the meeting-liouse as a perma- nent place for all such notices, warrants for town meetings, etc. — exchanged afterwards for two Lombardy poplars, vxnto one of which Dr. Emmons always liitclied his horse on Sundays. ADDENDA. 109 the audience were especially- inattentive and sleepy, Dr. Emmons closed Ms manuscript, took down his three-cornered hat, and with- out further premonitions descended the pulpit, passed down the broad aisle and out of the house to his home. August 3, at a church meeting, he explained his conduct ; whereupon the church voted : '' 1. It is reasonable the pastor should insist upon having the proper attention of the people in time of public worship. 2. It is reasonable the church should desire and endeavor that proper attention be given in the time of public worship and discouuti.'- nance all inattention." Some ^^ears later, 29th December, 1)S16, he complained directly in a letter to the church of what he calls " a designed inattention," upon Avhich that body repeats its vote of 1790. The year following, 5th May, 1817, the town adopted th& following petition to the State Legislature : — The petition of the town of Franklin sheweth that we your peti- tioners, seriously impressed with a sense of the indispensible obli- gation of the people in this state to remember and sanctify the- christian Sabbath, are fully convinced that some effectual meauf^ ought to be adopted and pursued to restrain them from the external and gross profanation of that holy da}'. We concur in the opin- ions of the respectable Association of ministers in the county of Hampshire, that the present laws respecting the Sabbath need to be revised and amended. We, therefore, unite with our fellow citizens who view the subject in this hght, in respectfully and; earnestly requesting the Honorable Legislature to pass such acts as they shall deem necessar}' to promote the due observance of the Lord's Day throughout the Commonwealth. On the gravest e\il of society, the prevalence of intemperance ,^ the church took earl}' and decided action. Dr. Emmons was al- wa^'s strictl}' abstemious and among the first advocates of totaE abstinence. "WTiile the bottle of new rum was regarded as a. necessary utensil of the hay-field, excessive drinking was confinedi to a few notorious persons. Even these were gloriously drunk only on occasions like the annual muster, election daj% and the town meeting. The earliest temperance lecture we recollect was- by a Mr. Frost, who filled the old meeting-house with an enthusias- tic audience and rallied a long file of names to the pledge. But there were earlier movements. Hon. M. M. Fisher saj's in cue of his "Reminiscences," "the Temperance pledge was signed as early as 1825, after a lecture given in the Popolatic school-house 110 HISTORY OF FRANKLIN. hy a son of Dr. Beecher, who was visiting with his sister Catliarine at Mr. Caleb Fisher's. Mr. Fisher and Mr. Elisha BuUarcl with otliers signed it, and afterwards dechned to furnish liquor in hay time." The selectmen in those days " posted " the names of inveterate drunkards to whom all dealers were forbidden to sell. The list was sometimes fearfull}- long. But the zeal of Drs. Miller and Hunting and others secured rapidl}' a wide change of opinion and practice, so that Franklin became early, and continues to be, a thorough temperance town. XIV. TOWN INDUSTRIES. The means and energies of the first settlers of this territory were devoted to the clearing of their wilderness farms. They had ■neither time nor need in their simple living to turn themselves to manufactures. Corn-mills and saw-mills were their onl}' necessity. These they had to build as soon as possible. The meeting-house first, and then the corn-mill. Body and soul could then be fed for other work. The first move in Wrentham was to grant twelve acres of land at the ponds for a corn w^ater-mill, which was offered to Robert Grossman, and finally, in 1685, assumed by John Whiting, who iDuilt a mill on the site of the present Eagle factory. This mill tt'emained in the line of his descendants for over a century. But as the population spread into the present Franklin and be- gan to crystallize about a new center, they sought for mill con- veniences nearer their homes. We have not the data for giving the ■order of progress, but the earliest move towards a mill which we have discovered was in 1713 on Mine brook. In the ''great divident" of 28th March, 1698, " Lott 50 in Michael Willson Sen.'s part, five acres are granted to Daniel Haws jun. on the mine brook below Thomas Thurston & above the falls near Elcazer Metcalf : bounded by land laid out to the Wid. Pond in part northward, and common on all other parts : the Brook running through it." Young Daniel Hawes and his neigh- bor Metcalf associate with others to utiHze these falls in Mine brook for mill purposes, and they sign the following contract: — ADDENDA. Ill Wrentham, Febriuiiy the 7, 1713. We hose names are hereunto subscril;)ed doe agree to build a sawmill at the place called the Mineln-ook : Daniel Haws none quarter, John Maccane none quarter, Eleazer Metcalf & Samuel IMetcalf none quarter, Robert Pond Sen. non quarter. We doe covenant & agree as foUowes : — 1 . A\^e doe promis that we wil each of us carrj^ on & do our equal proporchon throught in procuring of irones & hueing framing of a dam & mill & all other labor throught so faire as the major part shall se meat to doe till tlie mill be finished througlit and made fit for to goe then to com to a reckoning. 2. We do a gre that all of us shall have liberty for to work out his proporsion of work & in case aney none of us neglect to carry ■on his part of said mill the rest of the owners to carry on said work till it be done & fit to saw & he that neglects to carry on his part of said mill shall par half a crown a day to the rest of the owners that did said work. 3. AYe du agre that said land shall I3- for a mill pond soe long as the major part shall se fit. We du all so agre that no non shall sell his part of said mill till he has first mad a tender to the rest of the owners. We du al so agre that no non shal sel his part in the land til he lies tenderd it to the rest of the owners. Signed sealed & delivered Robart Pond in the presence of Daniel Haws Ezra Pond John Maccane Jonathan AVright Eleaser Metcalf ^ i^is Samuel Metcalf Robert -j- Pond mark. On the back is the still further agreement : — to lay out each man's loot as they are drawn — the first loot is to be gin four foot from the upper sil of the streak sil and soe up unto the ind of the sleapers, and to devid it equal in to fower loots & from the sleapers towards the road so as not to interrupt the road. RoBART Pond Daniel Haws John Maccane Eleazer Metcalf Samuel Metcalf Daniel Thurston March the 7. 1717 The saw-mill so built stood where Joseph Whiting afterwards had a mill, and where one of the numerous felting mills of the Ra}^ brothers now stands. In the laying out of a surveyor's district 29th May, 1736, there are other mills in town mentioned — " the Iron works " (which we 112 HISTORY OP FRANKLIN. locate on Mine brook near the foot of Forge Hill), "Benjamin Morse's saw-mill," and "Adams' corn-mill" (which last was at City Mills) . But these Avere hardly manufactories. Only the arts necessary to farming got any footing in the town until the begin- ning of the present century, when a new industry was introduced whioli has had an important influence upon the character and prosperity of the town. The braiding and making of straw into bonnets came from Pro\-idence, R. 1. Capt. John Whipple had a store in that city, in which his wife, Naomi, had also a small millinery shop. Her bonnets came through New York from Europe. Mrs. AVhipple and her assistant, Hannah Metcalf, unraveled a scrap of the braid one day and learned the secret of its fabric. Procuring some straw they successfully imitated the braid, and soon after made and sent a box of her own bonnets to her New York importer. The trade grew rapidly, so profitable was it, and other Providence ladies learned the process. In the sunnner of 1799 several Providence girls came to a boarding-school in Massachusetts, wearing their home-made bonnets, which created no little excitement. One of them, Sally Richmond, came to Wrentham acadeni}'. She knew the art and taught it to the ladies where she boarded. Thus was straw-braiding introduced to this State through "Wrentham, and naturall}' spread next into this town. The first bonnets were made of oat straw flattened, and con- tained from sixteen to eighteen 3'ards of wide Dunstable. So mightily did the novelty take that no girl was considered of the ton without one. The fashion gave a vigorous impulse to the trade and the sale of straw bonnets spread through the land. The Wrentham ladies in 1804 bought an organ for their church by contribution of straw bonnets, which were sold b}' their agent in Maine and with no small profit to himself.* One result of the sudden uprise of this new industry was a great addition to the business of small trading stores. They sold their goods in exchange for straw-braid. The stock so accumu- lated they soon began to convert into bonnets, and this led to special manufactories for straw goods. Fisher & Day, of Wrent- * This organ was moved from its " proper and conspicuous iilace " in 1823, into one of the back pews, and Dr. James Maun wrote a eulogy upou the whole " atchievement," which was printed in the Norfolk Repository, 1804. ADDENDA. 113 ham, first entered into this business in 1804. In 1810 Asa and Davis Thayer opened a store in Franklin at the City Mills, seUing their straw braid received for goods to Fisher, Day & Co. About 1812 they bought the Adams store near the Center, and re-estab- lished themselves much more largely, manufacturing their own bonnets in shapes and styles of their own. This was the second straw-goods firm in the county. They at first made from 6,000 to 8,000 bonnets per annum. In 1816 the Wrentham firm failed, by the selling out of one of the partners, it is said, and A. >& D. Thayer were left sole occupants of the new industry. Asa Thayer died in 1816, and Davis conducted the business alone until 1>!20, when Hermon C. Fisher became a partner. He finalh' started a separate concern, and others also entered into the business. But the Tha^'er house still continues in the same name and with greatly enlarged facilities and success, Franklin is now one of the chief towns where this industry flourishes. In 1869 it had no less than seven manufactories of straw goods, producing 1,500,000 hats and bonnets at a value of more than $1,000,000. This amount has been greatty increased b}- the use of improved machiner3\ al- though fewer persons are emplo^-ed at their homes and fewer firms conduct the business. A view is given opposite of Major Thayer's house and place of business. His store was on the left and the entrance where the settee is standing. The piazza is a modern addition. The first central post-offlce was in this store. Another industry in the town of gi'owing importance is the man- ufacture of felt goods. The first shoddy-picker, and probably the first in the country, was started in 1849 at Unionville by Messrs. J. G. & J. P. Ray. Col. Joseph Ray came with his family to Franklin in 1839 and engaged at first in making cotton goods. His three sons soon took up different lines of woolen goods, enlarging their mills and increasing their number at different localities, until their various factories of cotton, cassimere, felts, &e., produce about a million yards per year of satinets alone. The total of their products we do not know. Other firms have also lately entered upon similar industries within the town, but of these we have not any data, his- toric or otherwise. These have brought their accompaniments of 114 HISTORY OF FRANKLIN. machine shops, planiug-mills, and artisans, making the region of the depots lively centers of activity. The engraving opposite gives a view of the office of Messrs. Ray in the second story left, the National Bank in the right, and the present post-office and stores on the first floor. The building stands on the corner of IMain and Depot streets, and is of pressed brick. The shoe business has never put more than a single foot in the town. In 1850, N. C. Newell lionght, moved and converted the old Emmon's barn into a boot shop. J. M. Freeman followed him soon after in the same shop, but his increasing business has led him twice to rebuild larger accommodations. Other manufactories of less extent have been started at different dates, which cannot here have special mention. Franklin is a ver}' busy town, where loafing finds a difficulty in resisting o]iportiinities for work. But as an evidence that Franklin is not wholly material in its tastes, it should be recorded that it lias at this date two weekly newspapers well conducted. ])esides a job-printing office, not to mention at least one boy's hand-press doing a lively little busi- ness. The Franklin Jieyi.ster was first issued in October, 1872, by James M. Stewart, editor and proprietor, and is still in a flourish- ing condition under his assiduous management. Another weekly sheet has lately appeared, called the Franklin /Sentinel, by R. E. Capron. indicating a conviction of the town's growing intellectual appetite for more. The business of the town sustains a national and a savings bank, both successfully managed. Stores, shops, etc.. requisite to a thriving town, abound. A view of one of the later blocks (Fletcher's) on Main street, nearly opposite the post-office, is given between pages 116 and 117. The following statistics from the State census of 1 H P3 ADDENDA. 115 -States Internal Revenue, will exhibit the material progress of the town during the past century : — INDUSTRIAL TABLE. Year. Polls. Valuation. Houses. Barns. Hoi-ses. Oxen. Cows. Slieep. 1786.. ..2.53 £2,401 18s. Od. 127 119 132 198 570 856 1790.. ..274 2,803 Ms. 6d. 143 131 139 270 788 1800. . ..296 $13,294 40 169 157 180 275 729 1810.. ..288 17,318 95 180 178 103 265 733 1820.. . .323 15,.524 75 210 180 143 274 599 1830.. ..286 343,124 00 234 208 149 274 563 301 1840.. ..372 417,078 00 262 227 183 191 448 129 1850.. ..384 648,456 00 304 240 185 192 493 12 1860. . ..545 811,636 00 379 269 245 142 508 5 1865.. ..543 1,116,660 00 402 269 573 16 1875.. ..717 1,433,635 00 464 331 466 4 -1878.. ...890 1,. 551,645 00 563 365 522 XV. LISTS OF PUBLIC OFFICERS. (From the incorporation of the precinct to the px'esent time.) 1. PRECINCT CLERKS. Daniel Thurston (first clerk), 1738. Michael Metcalf, 1757. Ezra Pond, 1739, '42. Simon Slocomb, 1740, '41, '43, '48, '52. John Fisher, 1744, '47. Jabez Fisher, 1753, '56. Hezekiah Fisher, 1758, '69, '73. Timothy Pond, 1759, '62. Jonathan Whiting, 1763, '68. Ebenezer Metcalf, 1774-'77. Asa Pond, 1778, '80, '82, '85. Hezekiah Fisher, 1781. Nathan Daniels, Jr., 1786, '91, 1804 Amos Hawes, 1792, 1803. Asa Harding, 1805, '15. Lewis Harding, 1816, '23. 3. TOWN CLERKS. Capt. David Baker, 1824-'36. Wilkes Gay, Jr., 1837-'39. Davis Thayer, Jr., 1840-'45. Theron C. Hills, 1846-'62. Alpheus A. Kussegue, 1863-75. George W. Wiggin, 1876-'78. PRECINCT TREASURERS. Eleazer Metcalf, 1738. Kobert Blake, 1743-'52, '58, '6S. Nathaniel Fairbank, 1739. Baruch Pond, 1754-'57, '61-'64. David Jones, 1740, '41. Daniel Thurston, 1759, '60, '65-'67, Thomas Bacon, 1742, '53. '69-'71. 4. TOWN TREASURERS. Asa Whiting, 1778-'87, '92, '93. Lt. Phineas Ware, 1800-1804. Seth Lawrence, 1788-'91. Timothy Metcalf, 1S05-'16. Joseph Whiting, Jr., 1794-'96. Simeon Partridge, 1817-'19. Hauan Metcalf, 1797-99. Col, Caleb Thurston, 1820-'32. 116 HISTORY OF FRANKLIN. Joel Daniels, 1833-'55, '42-'53. Wilkes Gay, Jr., l8.36-'3n. Georo-e W. Morse, 1840, '41. Theron C. Hills, 1854-60. 5. SEI.EC Samuel Lethbridge, 1778. Dea. Jonathan MetciUf, 1778, '70. Asa Wliitino;, 1778, 79. Hezekiah Fisher, 1778. Ens. Joseph Ilawes, 1778, '70. Ebenezer Lawrence, 1770, '80, Joseph Whiting;, Jr., I77i). Capt. Asa Fairbanks, 1780. tsamuel Morse, Jr., 1780, '81, "83. William Gilmore, 1780-'82. James Metcalf. 1781. John Eichardson. 1781, '82, '87, "04 -'08. Asa Pond, 178l'-'8.'j. Benjamin Pond, 1782. I'eter Adams, 1782. Joseph Hills, 17So-'86. John Boyd, 1783-'85, '03. Nathan Daniels, 1783. Ebenezer Dean, 178t)-'88. Nathan Daniels, Jr., 1780-88, 1802 -'04. Moses Knapp, 1788, '00, 1800, '01. Seth Bacon, 1780-'01. Capt. Eli Richardson, 1780, '01, '02, '00, 1800, '01. Peter Whitino-, 1780-01, 04-'08. Elisha Hardini;, 1700. Jonathan Wales, 1702, '03. Isaac Heaton, Jr., 1702, '03. Pelatiah Fisher, 1704-'08. William Adams, 1700-1800, '02. Amos Hawes, 1802, '03. Capt. Stephen Kingsbury, 1803, '04. Timothy Rockwood, 1804, '05. Dea. Joseph Bacon, 1805-'08. Jabez Fisher, Jr., 1805. James Metcalf, lS0G-'08. Capt. Robt. Gilmore, 1800-'09. Lieut. Phineas Ware, 1809, '10. Lewis Fisher, 1809-'18, '20-'24, '28. William Makepeace, 1810-'13. Adams Daniels, 1861, '62. Alpheus A. Russegue, 1863-74- James M. Freeman, 187.">-'78. I'MEX. Daniel Sayles, 1811, '12. William Boyd, 1813, '14, '17. Nathan Woodward, 1814-16. James Adams, 1815, '16. Capt. Asa Harding, 1817-22. Capt. David Hartshorn, 1818, '19. Capt. Dyar C;iark, 1818-'23. Ensign Seth Dean, 1823-'28. Lieut. Willis Fisher, 1824-'27, '43. Col. Caleb Thurston, 182.")-'34. AVm. Makepeace, Jr., 1820-'32. Dr. Spencer Pratt, 1829-31. Capt. Alfred Knapp, 1832-'35.. Col. Nathan Cleveland, 1833-'37. Joel Daniels, Jr., 1835-'38. Elisha Ricliardson, 1836-'38. Wane Adams, 1838-'40. Capt. Hartford Leonard, 1839-41. William Metcalf, 1839, '40, '42, '43. Albert E. Daniels, 1841, '42. Rila Scott, 1841. Martin Green, 1842, '43, '45. Daniel Thurston, 1844. Dea. Levi F. Morse, 1844-'46. Capt. Erastus Rockwood, 1844-'49, Dea. Peter Adams, 184C)-'40, '75, '76. Col. Saul B. Scott, 1847. George W. Nason, 1848-54, '57, '59. Joel P. Adams, 18.50, '51. Elisha Hubbard, 1850, '51. Dea. Joseph T. Bacon, 1852, '53. Robert Gilmore, 1852, '53. Elias Cook, 1854-' 56. Stephen W. Richardson, 1854-'56, '75. Joseph Morse, 1855, '56. Francis B.Ray, 1857, '58, '77. Seth Partridge, 1857. Maxcy Cook, 1858, '59. Lowell B. Cleveland, 1850, '60« Otis Wales, Jr., lSG0-'63. ADDENDA. 117 James P. Kay, 1860-'