Sfi 191 Copy j A Classification of the Cultivated Varieties of Barley A THESIS Presented to the Faculty op the Graduate School of Cornell University for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BY ROY GLEN WIGGANS Published by the N. Y. State College of Agriculture, September 1921, Memoir 46 A Classification of the Cultivated Varieties of Barley A THESIS Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BY ROY GLEN WIGGANS I! Published by the N. Y. State College of Agriculture, September 1921, A/Tpmfnv Af\ Memoir 46 ' 1^7/ • CONTENTS PAGE Work of other investigators 369 Classifications 369 Number of species 380 Summary 381 Material used in the present classification 383 Morphology of the barley plant 384 Gross characters 384 Foliage 384 Culm characters 385 Height of plant 385 Length of last internode. .' 386 Number of nodes 386 Roots 386 Habit of plant in early growth 387 Emergence of awns and spikes 388 Time of maturity 388 Production 388 Spike characters 388 Fertility 389 Branch-headed barleys 392 Density . 393 Length of internodes of rhachis 394 Angle of inclination of kernel 397 Attitude of spike 397 Articulation of internodes of rhachis 398 Spikelet characters 398 The grain. 398 Composition 399 Size 399 Shape 400 Color 401 The lemma, or flowering glume 403 Adherence of lemma and palea to caryopsis 404 Terminal appendage 405 Number of nerves of lemma 407 Barbing of lateral nerves of lemma 407 Base of lemma 408 The outer glumes 410 The rhachilla 411 Summary , 412 365 366 Contents Classification of barley forms ,413 Hordeum spontaneum 415 Hordeum vulgare 416 Hordeum intermedium 430 1 Hordeum distichon 433 1 Hordeum deficiens 443 ! Summary 447 Acknowledgments 448 i Bibliography 449 1 Index to varieties and subvarieties 453 1 A CLASSIFICATION OF THE CULTIVATED VARIETIES OF BARLEY A CLASSIFICATION OF THE CULTIVATED VARIETIES OF BARLEY Roy Glen Wiggans The need for systematic classifications of the various farm crops has been recognized in recent years, due to the large increase in the number of varieties and the confusion in the nomenclature. It is the purpose of this study to make a classification of barleys that will aid agronomists, seedsmen, and farmers to identify the different varieties in common cultivation and to clear up the misuses of nomenclature. Before a classification of any group of plants can be undertaken, it is necessary to have an accurate knowledge of the structure of the plants. For this reason, and because it is hoped that the descriptions may be of value to detailed studies in the future, the morphology of the barley plant is fully discussed in this paper. WORK OF OTHER INVESTIGATORS CLASSIFICATIONS The numerous and extensive researches on barley already available have been made largely in Europe, and deal more with the malting and brewing qualities of the barley grown and the processes of manufacturing than with systematic classification. This work, however, has not been entirely neglected. Classifications have been presented by various European and American investigators. On close examination, these classifications are found to differ widely in arrangement and in the weight given the various characters that have been used in distinguishing between the species and also between groups of lesser importance. For these reasons, and in order (1) to make available the classifications of European investigators and (2) to give weight to the characters employed in the present classification, considerable space is devoted in this paper to reviewing the various classifications that have previously been presented. The earliest classification of barleys of any importance was that of Linnaeus (1748) 1 . Five years later (1753) he elaborated on his first work, 'Dates in parenthesis refer to Bibliography, page 449. 369 370 Roy Glen Wiggans recognizing four distinct species and two varieties of cultivated barleys, as given briefly in the following key: A. All spikelets fertile. B. Spikes dense Hordeum hexastichon L. BB. Spikes lax H. vulgare L. C. Kernels hulless H. vulgare var. coeleste L. AA. Median spikelet fertile. B. Spikes dense H. zeocriton L. BB. Spikes lax H. distichon L. C. Kernels hulless H. distichon var. nudum L. In making his classification Linnaeus recognized three important taxonomic characters — fertility, density, and adherence of lemma and palea to the caryopsis. These three characters have been given important considera- tion in practically every classification made since, and the species established by Linnaeus have been the foundation of all subsequent work. AH classifications previous to that of Linnaeus were necessarily based on very small collections, and as a consequence only two types of barley, the six-rowed and the two-rowed, were recognized. For this reason, nothing is to be gained by a review of the literature previous to 1753. No work was done on barleys for sixty-five years after the publication of Linnaeus' classification. Schiibler (1818) named seven species by employing the same characters as were used by Linnaeus. The only addition he made was the separation for the first time of the Linnaean species distichon into erectum and nutans. This separation was made on density, thus giving three species of two-rowed barleys, zeocriton, erectum, and nutans, based on the density of the spike. Following Schiibler, Seringe (1819) recognized four species, all of which had been named by Linnaeus. Later (1841-42) he made subdivisions of the four species but failed to add anything of value to previous work. Jessen (1855) presented a brief classification wherein he considered all cultivated varieties of barley as one species, namely, Hordeum sativum Jess. He was the first botanist to thus limit the number of species of cultivated barleys. Heuze (1872), working with a much larger collection of barleys than his predecessors used, was able to expand and enlarge on the classifications previously presented. His work doubtless stimulated later workers, especially Kornicke, who published Die Saatgerste (1882) and later elabor- ated on this work in the Handbuch des Getreidebaues (Kornicke, 1885). A Classification of the Cultivated Varieties of Barley 371 The classification of Kornicke, as presented in 1885, is given briefly in the following key. 2 He considered all cultivated varieties to belong to one species, Hordeum vulgar -e L., and established four primary groups within the one species, using fertility, terminal appendage, and number of rows or ranks as the chief characters. A. All spikelets fertile Hordeum polystichum Doll. B. All spikelets awned. C. Six-rowed barley, the spikes with six similar rows H. hexaslichum L. CC Four-rowed barley, the spikes with four dissimilar rows; two opposite rows formed by the overlapping of two spikelets H. tetrastichum Kcke. BB. Only the middle spikelets awned, middle barley H. intermedium Kcke. AA. Only the middle spikelets fertile. Two-rowed barley H'. distichum L. The varieties within the four subspecies which Kornicke established are as follows: 1. Hordeum hexastichum L. A. Kernels hulled. B. Outer glumes normal, linear. C. Spike yellow. D. Grain short var. brachyatherum Kcke. DD. Grains long. E. Spike pyramidal var. pyramidatvm Kcke. EE. Spike with parallel sides var. parallelum Kcke. CC. Spike black. D. Spike short, somewhat pyramidal var. Schimperianum Kcke. DD. Spike long, with parallel sides var. gracilius Kcke. BB. Outer glumes all or in part broadly lanceolate. C. All outer glumes broadly lanceolate var. earylepis Kcke. CC. Only the outer glumes of the lateral spikelets broadly lanceolate. var. recens Kcke. AA. Kernels naked var. revelatum Kcke. 2. Hordeum tetrastichum Kcke. A. Kernels hulled. B. Glumes normal. C. Spike yellow. D. Grain straight var. pallidum Ser. DD. Grain twisted var. Heuzei Kcke. CC. Spike gray -blue var. coerulescens Ser. CCC. Spike black. D. Grain rough var. nigrum Willd. DD. Grain smooth var. leiorrhijnchum Kcke. BB. Glumes monstrous. C. Grain long, strong var. tortile Robert. CC. Grain short, intermediate var. cucullatum Kcke. CCC. Grain weak var. Horsfordianum Wittm. 2 The key is translated from the original German, but is rearranged in the standard form. 372 R° Y Glen Wiggans AA. Kernels naked. . B. Glumes normal. C. Spike yellow. D. Spike long, narrow; kernel thin var. coeleste L. DD. Spike short; kernel thick. E. Kernel blue-gray var. himalayense Rittig. EE. Kernel yellowish blue, thinner var. Walpersii Kcke. CC. Spike gray-violet var. violaceum Kcke. BB. Glumes monstrous. C. Only on middle spikelet var. cornutum Schrader CC. On all spikelets. D. Awned var. pseudotrif arcatum Langsd. DD. Awnless var. trifurcatum Schl. 3. Hordeum intermedium Kcke. 'A. Spike thick, straight var. transiens Kcke. AA. Spike weak, nodding var. Haxtoni Kcke. 4. Hordeum dislichum L. A. Rhachis at maturity remaining entire. B. Spike normal. C. Kernels hulled. D. Spike with parallel sides. E. Spike weak, narrow. F. Spike yellow. G. Grain rough var. nutans Schiibl. GG. Grain smooth var. medicum Kcke. FF. Spike blackish : var. nigrescens Kcke. FFF. Spike black. G. Grain rough var. nigricans Ser. GG. Grain smooth var. persicum Kcke. EE. Spike thick, short. F. Yellow var. ereclum Schiibl. FF. Black var. con'.ractum Kcke. DD. Spike becoming smaller at point. E. Yellow var. zeocrithum L. EE. Black var. melanocrithum Kcke. CC. Kernels naked var. nudum L. BB. Spike abnormal. C. Spike simple. D. Flowers of side spikelets normal. E. Outer glumes of middle spikelet normal var. heterolepis Kcke. EE. Outer glumes of middle spikelet short lanceolate var. Braunii Kcke. DD. Flowers of side spikelets entirely degenerated. E. Outer glumes of middle spikelet short lanceolate. F. Yellow var. abyssinicum Ser. FF. Black var. macrolepis A. Br. EE. Outer glumes of middle spikelet normal. F. Yellow var. deficiens Steud. FF. Brown var. Seringei Kcke. FFF. Black var. Steudelii Kcke. CC. Spike branched. D. Side spikelets normal var. compositum Kcke. DD. Side spikelets not normal var. ramosum Hochst. AA. Rhachis at maturity falling apart var. sponlaneum C. Koch A Classification of the Cultivated Varieties of Barley 373 Under the preceding classification Kornicke brought together and described in detail 103 sorts which varied widely in structure and also in adaptation. Some of the varieties given in the classification were not represented in his collection, while others were represented by many sorts or subvarieties. Since its publication the grouping given by this author has been considered the best one on the subject of barley varieties. In general the treatment given is very satisfactory and has been sufficient in most cases to establish varieties on a firm basis. The most apparent weakness in the scheme is in the treatment of the main groups, where a division of the six-rowed form is made on the arrangement of the rows of spikelets. The characters given the most weight by this author in the subdivisions are: adherence of the lemma and the palea to the caryopsis, shape of the outer glume, color of the grain, shape of the grain, shape of the spike, roughness or smoothness of the grain, and character of the rhachis. Two later papers by Kornicke (1895 and 1909, the latter published posthumously by his son, M. Kornicke) appeared, neither of which added anything of value to the previous paper; in fact, they lacked the clearness that was evident in the earlier publication. Voss (1885), in the same year as that in which the Handbuch des Getreidebaues appeared, also published a classification of barleys. Voss considered all cultivated varieties as one species, and followed Jessen (1855) in using Hordeum sativum as the species name. The subspecies, varieties, and subvarieties used by Voss are as follows : 3 A. All flowers perfect and fertile subspecies polystichon Doll. 1. Six-rowed barleys. var. hexastichon L. a. Spikes white subvar. album b. Spikes black subvar. nigrum 2. Parallel barleys var. parallelum Kcke. a. Spikes white subvar. album b. Spikes black subvar. nigrum 3. Unequal or odd-rowed barleys var. inaequale Voss a. Spikes white subvar. album b. Spikes black subvar. nigrum 4. Hull -less barleys var. coeleste L. a. Erect barleys subvar. erectum Voss b. Lax barleys subvar. flaccidum Voss c. Hooded barleys subvar. trifurcatum S6r. AA. Only the middle flowers fertile, side flowers staminate; two-rowed barleys. subspecies distichon L. 5. Peacock barleys var. zeocrithon L. a. Spikes white subvar. album b. Spikes black subvar. nigrum '■ Translated from the original German. 374 Roy Glen Wiggans 6. Erect barleys var. erectum Schiibler a. Spikes white subvar. album b. Spikes black subvar. nigrum 7. Nodding two-rowed barleys var. nutans Schiibler a. Spikes white subvar. album b. Spikes black subvar. nigrum 8. Naked two-rowed barleys var. nudum L. AAA. Only the middle flowers fertile, side flowers entirely lost or stunted ; deficient barleys. subspecies deficiens Steud. 9. Dense deficient barleys • -var. densum Voss a. Spikes white subvar. album b. Spikes black subvar. nigrum 10. Loose deficient barleys var. laxum Voss a. Spikes white subvar. album b. Spikes black subvar. nigrum 11. Wide deficient barldys var. platyiepis Voss a. Spikes white subvar. album b. Spikes black subvar. nigrum 12. Long deficient barleys var. macrolepis A. Br. a. Spikes white subvar. album b. Spikes black subvar. nigrum In the separation of his main groups Voss used only one character, that of fertility, of which he recognizes three degrees. This is a decided advance over the group separation given by Kornicke, although the treatment of varieties by Voss is much inferior to that of Kornicke. In making varietal differences, Voss uses the following characters: shape of spike, arrangement of rows of spikelets, and color. Atterberg, working from 1889 to 1899, published several papers on barley classification, but it was not until 1899 that he presented anything differing materially from the work of previous investigators. In 1899 he published his Die Varietaten una Formen der Gerste, wherein he departed radically from the established systems. In designating 188 forms he used only 33 different terms. He followed Jessen in placing all cultivated varieties in one species, Hordeum sativum. His scheme is as follows: 4 Subspecies (Unterarten) of Hordeum sativum A. Middle spikelets awned. B. Glumes small Hordeum sativum commune BB. Glumes large, about the length of the ripe grain, awns not considered. H. sat. macrolepis AA. Middle spikelets awnless or hooded. B. Middle spikelets hooded H. sat. furcatum BB. Middle spikelets awnless H. sat. inerme * Translated from the original German, but rearranged in the standard form for keys. A Classification of the Cultivated Varieties of Barley 375 Each subspecies was divided into the following groups (Abarten) : A. Glumes remaining attached to caryopsis at maturity. B. Grains light-colored album BB. Grains dark-colored nigrum AA. Glumes lost from caryopsis at maturity. B. Grains light-colored nudum BB. Grains dark-colored nigronudum Each group was then divided into the following varieties : A. All six spikelets fertile. B. Side spikelets awned polystichum BB. Side spikelets not awned; established by crossing six-rowed and two-rowed forms. muticum AA. Side spikelets infertile. B. Glumes small, short, linear distichum BB. Side spikelets rudimentary; outer glumes lacking or almost lacking; only small lemmas present deficiens The varieties of six-rowed barleys were each further divided into the following subvarieties : A. Average length of rhachis internode, 1.7-2.1 mm. Spike very dense hexastichum AA. Average length of rhachis internode, 2.1-2.8 mm. Spike average density . . .parallelum AAA. Average length of rhachis internode, 2.7-4.0 mm. Spike loosely formed vulgar e The varieties of two-rowed barleys were each further divided into the following subvarieties: A. Average length of internode, 1.7-2.1 mm. Spikes very thick zeocrithum AA. Average length of internode, 2.1-2.8 mm. Spikes usually standing upright . . . .erectum AAA. Average length of internode, 2.8-4.0 mm. Spikes loose, generally nodding at maturity. nutans In the formation of his four subspecies, Atterberg used both the terminal appendage and the character of the outer glumes. Further divisions were made on color, adherence of lemma to caryopsis, fertility, shape of outer glumes, length of internodes, and density of spike. To make lesser groups than those given above, he used the character of the base of the kernel, the basal bristle, rough and smooth awns, and color. This scheme of classification shows a familiarity with a wider range of types than does the work of any previous investigator. Atterberg could not have followed the systematic arrangement had he not possessed a collection in which the lesser factors constantly reappeared in important groups. The objection to the system is that confusion is bound to occur (1) in the division of the subspecies and (2) in the repetition of the same terms in all the subdivisions, even though there are only 33 terms used. 376 Roy Glen Wiggans Atterberg considers the designation of 188 varieties by only 33 different terms as a decided improvement over previous classifications, but this seems to be a doubtful advantage. In connection with the work of Atterberg, the Swedish, or Svalof, system of classification should be considered. Atterberg himself in 1889 laid (he foundation for this system of classification. His work was subse- quently improved upon by Neergaard (1889), but it remained for Bolin (1893) to perfect the system and put it into practice. The system which Bolin worked out at that time has been used in Sweden ever since for the identification of the important varieties. Briefly the system is as follows : 5 A. Two-rowed barley ; all ke/nels broadest in the middle and symmetrical in contour. B. Dorsal side of base of kernel with a slight horseshoe-like excavation or depression. Hordeum dislichum nutans C. Rhachillae and lodicules long-haired. D. Lateral nerves without teeth Type I DD. Lateral nerves with teeth Type II CC. Rhachillae and lodicules short-haired, more or less woolly. D. Lateral nerves without teeth Type HI DD. Lateral nerves with teeth Type IV BB. Dorsal side of base of kernel not excavated but often pinched with a transverse- crease or furrow //. dislichum erectum C. Rhachillae and lodicules long-haired. D. Dorsal nerves without teeth Type V DD. Dorsal nerves with teeth Type VI CC. Rhachillae and lodicules short-haired, more or less woolly. D. Dorsal nerves without teeth Type VII DD. Dorsal nerves with teeth Type VIII AA. Six-rowed barley; all kernels from outer rows of head slightly twisted; kernels from middle rows symmetrical but broadest nearer the tip, the basal half being somewhat elongated H. tetrastichum pallidum B. Rhachillae and lodicules long-haired. C. Lateral nerves without teeth Type IX CC. Lateral nerves with teeth Type X BB. Rhachillae and lodicules short-haired, more or less woolly. C. Lateral nerves without teeth Type XI CC. Lateral nerves with teeth Type XII The great additions made by the investigations of these men were the discoveries of the stable characters of the rhachilla, or basal bristle, and the lateral nerves. These two discoveries marked a real advance in the matter of barley classification. Many other studies were made on minor differences in varieties, which were not found to be constant. Some years later (1906) Broili published a classification of two-rowed barleys in which he used the Svalof system to a very large extent, adding 6 Rearranged in the standard form for keys. A Classification of the Cultivated Varieties of Barley 377 little to the previous work. He, however, criticized the Svalof investi- gators in regard to the constancy of the characters of the rhachilla and the dorsal nerves. This criticism has been shown by subsequent investi- gators to be without foundation. Beaven (1902) presented the first comprehensive classification of barleys in English. The main groups which he considered under the one species, Hordeum sativum, are as follows: A. All spikelets fertile. B. All spikelets normal. C. Spike wide with short internodes Hordeum hexastichum L. CC. Spike narrow with long internodes H. vulgare L; H. tetrastichum Kcke. BB. Spikelets of median rows normal, spikelets of four lateral rows diminutive and without awns H. intermedium Kcke. C. Spike wide, with short internodes var. Haxtoni CC. Spike narrow, with long internodes var. transiens AA. Only the median spikelets fertile. B. Four lateral rows infertile or staminate. C. Spike wide, with short internodes H. zeocriton L. CC. Spike narrow, with long internodes H. distichum L. BB. Four lateral rows rudimentary and without floral organs (several Abyssinian varieties) H. decipiens Steudel In his main divisions Beaven used these characters: fertility and width of spike, and length of rhachis internode. He used the name H. vulgare L. for H. tetrastichum Kcke., and divided the two-rowed barleys into zeocriton L. and distichum L. to correspond with the two forms of six-rowed barleys. He did not make a division of the decipiens group. In his description of varieties he used character of the spike (normal or abnormal), shape of the spike, color of the grain, terminal appendage, and character of the awn. His varietal descriptions include many recently developed varieties, especially those of Karl Hansen, which in several cases were riot yet well established. Regel (1906, 1908, 1910) differed from earlier workers (1) by basing his minor groups on races varying somewhat in environmental adaptations, (2) by recognizing only two densities, (3) by considering blue and purple as forms of white varieties, and (4) by making smooth awns a very minor character. Harlan (1914) made a study of barleys somewhat paralleling that of the Svalof investigators. He made no classification, but gave the char- acters that are of taxonomic value a thorough study. He was able to verify the findings of many previous investigators as to the value of certain 378 Roy Glen Wiggans characters in classification as well as in genetic studies. Probably the most important addition to the knowledge of barleys which he gave was that in regard to pigmentation, which is reviewed later, in the discussion of the morphology of the barley plant. The grouping suggested by Carleton (1916) is as follows: 'spontaneum, K. Koch, distichum, Linn., two-row barley. vulgare, Linn., common or nodding six-row barley. Hordeum \ polystichum, Doll • hexastichum, Linn., club or erect six-row barley, intermedium, Kcke., hybrid barley. Carleton mtntions one other type, Hordeum distichum deficiens, of which there are two forms, but he does not consider it as one of the main groups. Under each of the above groups Carleton separated varieties by the use of the following characters: fertility, color of the grain, shape of the spike, character of the awns, and habit of early growth. He gives only a brief consideration to the general classification, and contributes little to previous works. A little later (1918) Harlan presented a classification which is to be commended in many respects. This is given here in detail: Key to the species All spikelets fertile (6-row barley). Lemmas of all florets awned or hooded vulgare L. Lemmas of lateral florets bearing neither awns nor hoods intermedium Kcke. Only the central spikelets fertile (2-rowed barley). Lateral spikelets consisting of outer glumes, lemma, palet, rachilla, and usually rudiments of the sexual organs distichon L. Lateral spikelets reduced, usually to only the outer glumes and rachilla, rarely more than one flowering glume present, and never rudiments of sexual organs deficiens Steud. This scheme is founded on the one character fertility, that of density being eliminated entirely. It likewise considers barley as consisting of four distinct species, on the grounds (1) that clearness is better secured by making the species a smaller unit, (2) that no group of wild plants of such wide variation is united under a single species, and (3) that there is abundant evidence that at least two parents were involved in the production of the forms now domesticated. The only difficulty in separating the main groups comes in a few cases in which the variety is more or less intermediate in character. As Harlan has pointed out, A Classification of the Cultivated Varieties of Barley 379 this condition arises very seldom in the existing varieties. It may, however, cause difficulty in the future as the number of varieties increases. By the use of the adherence of the lemma and the palea to the caryopsis, the terminal appendage of the flowering glume, and the color of the grain, Harlan has described eight varieties in each of his species as follows: Key to the varieties Hordeum vulgare. Kernels hulled. Lemmas awned. Kernels white, blue, or purple 1. pallidum. Kernels black 2. nigrum. Lemmas hooded. Kernels white, blue, or purple 3. horsfordianum. Kernels black 4. atrum. Kernels naked. Lemmas awned. Kernels white, blue, C purple 5. coeleste. Kernels black 6. duplinigrum. Lemmas hooded. Kernels white, blue, or purple 7. trifurcatum. Kernels black 8. aethiops. Hordeum intermedium. Kernels hulled. Lemma of central floret awned or awnless. Kernels white, blue, or purple 9. haxtoni. Kernels black 10. mortoni. Lemma of central floret hooded. Kernels white, blue, or purple 11. subcomutum. Kernels black 12. atricornulum. Kernels naked. Lemma of central floret awned or awnless. Kernels white, blue, or purple 13. nudihaxtoni. Kernels black 14. nudimortoni. Lemma of central floret hooded. Kernels white, blue, or purple 15. cornutum. Kernels black 16. subaethiops. Hordeum distichon. Kernels hulled. Lemmas awned or awnless. Kernels white, blue, or purple. . . .' 17. palmella. Kernels black : 18. nigricans. Lemmas hooded. Kernels white, blue, or purple 19. anguslispicatum . Kernels black 20. rimpaui. Kernels naked. Lemmas awned or awnless. Kernels white, blue, or purple 21. nudum. Kernels black 22. nigrinudum. Lemmas hooded. Kernels white, blue, or purple 23. laxum. Kernels black 24. nigrilaxum. 380 Roy Glen Wiggans Hordeum deficiens. Kernels hulled. Lemmas awned or awnless. Kernels white, blue, or purple 25. deficiens. Kernels black 26. steudelii. Lemmas hooded. Kernels white, blue, or purple 27. triceros. Kernels black 28. tridax. Kernels naked. Lemmas awned or awnless. Kernels white, blue, or purple 29. nudideficiens. Kernels black 30. decor iicatum. Lemmas hooded. Kernels white, blue, or purple 31. sublaxum. Kernels black 32. gymnospermum. For further divisions within the thirty-two varieties, Harlan used width of the outer glume, color of the kernels, character of the awns, density, and width and attitude of spike, in the order named. Thus, density, which has been given such an important place in all previous classifications, is here used only for a minor varietal distinction. No attempt is made in this publication by Harlan to distinguish commercial varieties. NUMBER OF SPECIES Although there is a consensus of opinion that fertility should be used as one, if not the only, character in making up the main groups of barley, there is by no means the same harmonious agreement in regard to the number of species. On the one hand, there is a group consisting of Linnaeus (1753), Schiibler (1818), Seringe (1819), Carleton (1916), and Harlan (1918), who have considered cultivated barleys as forming from three to seven species; on the other hand, Jessen (1855), Kornicke (1885), Voss (1885), Atterberg (1899), and Munro and Beaven (1900), have pre- ferred to group all barleys under one species. In general, species in cultivated crops should be based on their origin, as far as is possible. This general rule cannot be followed absolutely because of the uncertainty in regard to the progenitors of many groups of plants. After the species have been established, the subspecies and the groups should if possible be based on the order of evolution. This, like the establishment of the species, is uncertain to a large degree, and thus the classification becomes more and more artificial. In the establishment of species in the case of barleys, the very earliest classifications cannot have much weight because of the smallness of the A Classification of the Cultivated Varieties of Barley 381 collections and the lack of research in regard to their origin. Kornicke was the first to present the theory that all domesticated barley originated from one wild species, Hordeum spontaneum, and on this basis he made one species, Hordeum vulgare. Jessen, however, had previously considered all barley to belong to one species, Hordeum sativum Jess. Voss, Atterberg, and Beaven. following Kornicke's theory, considered barley as only one species but followed Jessen in terminology. In more recent years con- siderable evidence has been produced which indicates at least two wild ancestors for cultivated barley. The best discussion of this subject is by Schulz (1913), who presents the theory that by the accumulation of several small variations from the wild species H. spontaneum, a new wild species, H. ischnatherum, was produced which is widely distributed in the Tigris-Euphrates region. This form as it is found presents several variations in the characters of side spikeiets, just as does the wild species H. spontaneum, but in general it is much nearer the six-rowed type than is H. spontaneum. Schulz offers the further theory that by the accumulation of still more variations from H. ischnatherum, the cultivated forms of the six-rowed barleys have been derived, and in a similar manner the cultivated forms of the two-rowed barleys also have been derived from H. spontaneum. His opinion in regard to the origin of the intermediate forms between the common six-rowed and the common two-rowed barleys is that they arose by crossing. He thinks that the deficient forms arose directly from H. spontaneum, and not from any cultivated forms of two-rowed barleys. SUMMARY From the foregoing review of the various classifications, the progress after Linnaeus may be briefly summarized as follows: 1. The division of Hordeum distichon L. into H. erectum and H. nutans by Schtibler. 2. The grouping of all barley varieties into one species by Jessen. 3. The conception of the variety as a unit, by Kornicke, and the estab- lishment of a large number of varieties on a firm basis. (Kornicke's main groups, however, were not an improvement over the groups previously established.) 4. The new system of Atterberg, whereby 188 varieties were designated by the use of 33 terms. (It is doubtful whether this was an advance.) 382 Roy Glen Wiggans a < > |M R m in a I" H H H M > 01 s a .sj 41 3° 2 a .3 4> a a 11 O 0) — 03 O *3 O CO -a o a ^B * .a * -^ 01 03 > k. kl 41 4> 03 "o c 8-1 -B o"3 ^ a o J; fe <) H o Q M « i-! CO O c _oSoo o3<3> >, 03 0) Q o B c S 01 03 11 'a ft °1 "3 M) °1 bJ3 O -w O M 03 >. O 41 •73 01 3-M w rt kl 4) 1° Eg. o a> o o "3^ S3 -o ft S'ft fe jB (3 13 -e 3« 03 i—l >1 *0 B O a, "3*3 .S 5 Sg IS TJffl 3 b'3 01 -id n 'ft >,M o3'" H O k, o m o fe 03 in -B 02 1° 41 03 B >« o o gs fe-fl CO a §32 « >> o -3'S. -1 B S or" S B 1° "o a si -Oio 3 S 5 Q W 03 bl 2 03 -a pt, i-l < O tf o P5 0) 03 0) M CJD o> a <*. "9 'o £o> — 03 03-0 0) a B •« >> o 2 4) ^=3 4) *01 _Cl S3 •£§ < B B ■3 4> s g B J3 S 73 4) T3 41 3^ ■se £ _ O co •Si ° C c S 1 r V 03 1? u B.S 0) 4^ ft T3 co £ ft c3 03 -a co 03 H o < o fe -1 ? < eQ « « "0 — M _oS 03 BOO 53 cSt-i Erro B 01 00 ;H kl 01 v - k. a> v Z rt « fc m rt hj ^■5 S"5 goo >> M 0) O

> 03 '3 o. £ ft O k, (H O _ « CO 3 B O 03 g k, M sa b a CO 0) t. B S_3 3 M o a) £ ft o ffl 3_ « 4) o 73-a a ^ 41 o73^-* 3 ll £ 03 fe H 2; < O O *q J « w 03 t-. 5 B 3 Q0 : 3oO >> 5 >1 '3 e B . 02 0) B 11 Q ^"3 < g2 § >> !>> o 5 4100 u, B Cj Tj* CH £ B J3 - '►J (2 Q ^° ■a cn 00 ■* iO CO t^ CXI 05 O 5 « A Classification of the Cultivated Varieties of Barley 383 5. The classification of cultivated varieties by Beaven, wherein the treatment of the main groups was superior to that of Kornicke. 6. The discovery by Neergaard of the stability of the long- and the short-haired rhachillas, and the smooth and the barbed lateral nerves. 7. The researches of Harlan in regard to pigmentation in barleys. 8. The reclassification of barleys by Harlan wherein the main groups were established on the basis of fertility alone. The relative weight given the different characters by the various investigators are summarized in the table on the opposite page. It is seen that there is a very marked lack of agreement in the use of the various characters for classification purposes, with the one exception of fertility, which is used as a basis of separation for the main groups or species in every case but one. MATERIAL USED IN THE PRESENT CLASSIFICATION In the present study 627 specimens were under observation, many of which were alike in name and in all observable morphological characters. These so-called varieties were largely collected in 1915 by Professor E. G. Montgomery, of Cornell University, for the purpose of classification. The most valuable individual collections were those obtained from the California Experiment Station at Berkeley, California, the E. Clemens Horst Company of San Francisco, and the Okonomisch-botanische Garten of Halle University in Germany. From these three sources alone an aggregate of 475 specimens were obtained, including all the types of any economic importance and practically all the rarer types. This original collection has been enlarged by additions from the Department of Plant Breeding at Cornell University, from the Office of Foreign Seed and Plant Introductions and the Office of Cereal Investigation of the United States Bureau of Plant Industry, from the state agricultural experiment stations, particularly those of Virginia and Wisconsin, and from other minor sources, all of which have aided materially in completing the collection. The collection has been in the hands of the writer since 1915 and has been grown each year in rod rows, one foot apart. Since yield was not a factor in the present study, the rate of planting was adjusted in all cases so that good development of individual plants might be obtained. 384 Roy Glen Wiggans MORPHOLOGY OF THE BARLEY PLANT The first thing necessary in making a key for a group of plants is a detailed study of the morphological characters of the plants. This study is necessary for two reasons — to acquaint the investigator with the plants with which he expects to work, and to learn the characters that are not in- fluenced by environmental conditions. These are the characters that must be given the important places in the classification. Therefore a considera- tion of the morphological characters is of much importance in this paper. The various discussions herein not only include a description of the individual characters, but also consider their value taxonomically and the use made of them in the present and in previous classifications. However, the relative taxonomic value of the various characters is not given any weight in the arrangement of this section. The morphological characters as discussed herein are divided into three groups and are treated according to the following order: gross characters, spike characters, and spikelet characters. GROSS CHARACTERS The gross characters of barley, which include color, shape, and size of the leaves, number and size of culms, roots, and some other characters, are the least valuable among the three groups of characters from a taxonomic standpoint. The differences in these characters are usually not sufficient to warrant taxonomic divisions. Furthermore, they are the most variable of all the characters under different environmental conditions. Their chief value is to be found in varietal descriptions. Foliage The foliage of barley varieties presents a rather wide range of variations, all of which are difficult not only to describe but also to recognize. Varia- tions occur in color, length, width, and number of leaves. Kornicke (1885), in his varietal descriptions, used four shades of green — bright, dark, bluish, and yellowish. Difficulties immediately arise in such descriptive terms, because the personal factor is too great in describing or recognizing such a character for it to have much value. Other investi- gators have recognized difficulties in using such characters, and as a A Classification of the Cultivated Varieties of Barley 385 consequence have used color of foliage with much precaution. The length and the width of the leaves are variables which, like color, are largely dependent on environment and are limited in their use in the same way. For them to be of any value, accurate statistical work must be done. As a rule, when significant differences are found, it is between the larger groups, where no such detailed observations are necessary for the distinction. The most marked variation in leaves is between the spring and the winter barleys, which are discussed later. The variation in the number, exclusive of the basal leaves, is identical with the number of nodes, which is discussed in connection with culm characters. Culm characters The culms of barley, vary in several characters, but, in general, greater variations are produced by different environments than exist between closely related forms. For this reason these variations are, like the variations in the foliage, of minor importance in classification. Their only value is in varietal description. Such characters as height of the plant, number of culms to the plant, diameter of the culms, thickness of the culm wall, number of nodes, and length of the last internode, have been used more or less extensively in descriptions. Kornicke (1885, 1895, and 1909) made use of many varying vegetative characters in descriptive work. Height of 'plant The height of certain varieties in a particular locality varies as much as 100 per cent and for this reason may be of importance locally, but these same varieties grown in another region may have a reverse relationship in regard to height. This has been well shown by Harlan, who in 1911 selected thirteen pedigreed barleys representing a wide range of types and planted them at four widely separated points. He found a marked regional response For example, Odessa was short and unpromising in Minnesota and little better in California, but was very tall and vigorous in both Montana and North Dakota. The Abyssinian varieties, on the contrary, grew well in California but were very short elsewhere, as is seen from the accompanying table taken from Harlan (1914) : 386 Roy Glen Wiggans Influence of Geographical Location on the Length of the Culm in 13 Representative Selections of Barley Grown at Four Widely Separated Points, the Selections Being Arranged in the Order of Their Height at Each Point St. Paul, Minnesota Williston, North Dakota Moccasin, Montana Chico, California Hordeum vulgare Servian Odessa Hordeum vulgare Surprise Summit Servian S. P. I. No. 20375 . . . Kitzing, 6-rowed. . . . Manchuria Oderbrucker S. P. I. No. 20375 Odessa Oderbrucker Manchuria Hordeum vulgare Abyssinian Servian Oderbrucker Manchuria Smyrna Manchuria Summit Summit S. P. I. No. 20375 Surprise Odessa Kitzing, 2-rowed Kitzing, 6-rowed Kitzing, 6-rowed. . . . S. P. I. No. 20375. .. Princess Abyssinian Kitzing, 6-rowed Abyssinian Kitzing, 2-rowed. . . . Princess Kitzing, 2-rowed Surprise Kitzing, 2-rowed .... Hordeum vulgare Length of last internode The relation of the spike to the leaf sheath depends entirely on the length of the last internode — the one on which the spike is borne. The shorter the last internode, the less the spike will be exserted. The failure of the spike to be exserted from the leaf sheath has been used repeatedly in describing such barleys as the Smyrna and Princess varieties. The fact that this character occurs in the same varieties in widely differing localities is evidence enough that it is a true varietal character, but there is considerable variation within the variety. It is, however, characteristic enough in a few instances to determine a variety. In the present classification the length of the last internode is used in varietal descriptions. Number of nodes The number of nodes varies from three to seven in different varieties, but in all cases there is sufficient variation within the varieties to cause an overlapping, thus making the character uncertain. The number of leaves to a culm is identical with the number of nodes and consequently varies in the same way. Roots So far as it was determined, there are no varietal differences of roots that can be employed in classification. The ratio between tops and roots A Classification of the Cultivated Varieties of Barley 387 may vary to some extent between varieties, but similar variations occur within the variety as a result of local conditions. Consequently, root characters are of no value either for classification or for descriptive purposes. Habit of plant in early growth The habit of the plant in early growth is very important because it is by this character that spring and winter varieties are separated. The difference appears both in the number and the attitude of the culms and in the number of leaves. The ordinary spring varieties of barley have a small number of culms which stand erect at all stages of growth, and only a few basal leaves. Winter varieties, on the other hand, have a large number of culms and leaves which are more or less decumbent during the early part of the development of the plant. It is at this stage that such varieties pass the winter period. In the spring, when new growth begins, a few of the many culms elongate, producing the flowering stalks and the grain of the plant, while the others remain undeveloped and sooner or later disappear as a vital part of the plant. If these same varieties are seeded in the spring, a large tuft of leaves and very short culms are produced early in the season. The plants will remain at this stage for a considerable period before the flowering stalks are produced; in some cases, in fact, the flowering stalks entirely fail to appear, while those that do appear are usually infertile or produce very little grain. For this reason, it seems that a dormant period is needed for the proper development of these varieties. An intermediate condition, which may be called semi-erect, is also found in some varieties, in which the number of culms and leaves is above the average for barleys and the culms tend to spread out to some extent. All of such varieties are, however, spring varieties. This character can be used only in varietal description. The distinction between winter barleys and spring barleys was made by Kornicke (1885) and by Carleton (1916) in describing varieties, but has never been used as an important distinction between large groups of varieties. In the present classification the habit of the plants in early growth is used only in minor separations. 388 Roy Glen Wiggans Emergence of awns and spikes The date at which the head appears is a note that has been generally taken by all barley breeders as well as by those studying varietal differences. More recently this has been replaced by a note on the date of appearance of the awns. Harlan (1914) showed that the latter is more nearly accurate and easier to obtain than the former. This has proved to be true in the present investigation. The only objection to using the date of the emergence of the awns, instead of the date of the appearance of the head, is that hooded and awnless varieties cannot be compared with awned varieties. This is not a serious objection, however, as this character can be used only to distinguish strains within a variety. The relationship of strains in this regard varies with the locality. In the few cases of awnfess and hooded varieties, it is necessary to use the date of the appear- ance of the spike as the distinguishing character. The date of appearance of either the awn or the spike is so variable that it has no taxonomic value. Time of maturity Ordinarily the time of maturity is correlated with the date of emergence of the awns, but, as is the case with most other correlated characters, some exceptions occur. This character is of value at times, not only in distinguishing different varieties or strains in a given environment, but also in detecting mixtures in the field. A pure strain will mature all spikes within a very few days. This character is much more reliable when used in connection with early-maturing than with late-maturing varieties. Late-maturing varieties are often ripened abnormally by unfavorable weather conditions. This character is used in the present classification only in distinguishing strains otherwise similar, and in varietal descriptions. Production The yield of varieties, although in a given region varying from very small to very large, cannot be employed for classification purposes because it is almost wholly dependent on environment. Consequently, production has no place in the present investigation. SPIKE CHARACTERS The characters of the spike, including variations in fertility, density, and rhachis, are far more important from the standpoint of classification A Classification of the Cultivated Varieties of Barley 389 than the gross characters already discussed. Some of these spike char- acters which are the most conspicuous and the easiest to recognize, have been used in all previous barley classifications. In most instances either density or fertility has been given first place in the formation of groups. The differences in the characters of the spike are great and have been found to be constant under different environmental conditions. Because of these facts they have proved to be of much taxonomic value, and are so considered in the present classification. Fertility Barley varieties, as stated above, have been divided into groups according to the fertility of the spikelets, by all investigators who have worked on their classification. The first pre-Linnaean divisions were made on this character when only two groups were recognized, the two-rowed and the six-rowed. Linnaeus likewise followed this scheme, but used in connection with it the density of the spike, thereby making four groups or species. In 1885 Steudel (cited by Kornicke, 1885) fully described a third degree of fertility, which he designated as deficiens. Kornicke (1885) recognized a fourth degree of fertility in his group, known as intermedium. Thus, four definite stages of fertility have been recognized as important in the formation of groups in the case of barley. In order to understand the variation in fertility, it is necessary first to know the structure of the barley head. Barley, in common with all other members of the genus Hordeum, produces three single-flowered spikelets at each node of the flattened rhachis. Structurally the spikelets are very similar, each having two outer glumes, a lemma, and a palea, which inclose the sexual organs. In all cultivated barleys, the central spikelet of the series of three at each internode is always fertile. The variation in fertility is found only in the side spikelets, which present four stages of fertility, as has already been stated. These different con- ditions of fertility are as follows: (1) all three spikelets equally fertile, with the lemmas of each projected into a terminal appendage, either an awn or a hood as the case may be, and with the kernels of the side spikelets almost as large as the kernels of the medium spikelets (fig. 51, A and B, and fig. 69, H. vulgare) ; (2) all three spikelets fertile, but the lemmas of 390 Roy Glen Wiggans B CD Fig. 51. the structure of six-rowed barleys A, Dorsal view of perfect condition of fertility, where all spikelets are equally fertile and awned; B, ventral view of same; C, dorsal view of second condition of fertility, where side spikelets are fertile but about one-half the size of median spikelets and not awned; D, ventral view of same the side spikelets without terminal appendages, ending either in a point or bluntly, and the kernels of the side spikelets about one-half the size of the kernels of the median spikelets (fig. 51, C and D); (3) the side spikelets infertile, but possessing rudimentary sexual organs and all the structural parts of the fertile spikelets except the terminal appendages of the lemma (fig. 52, A and B) ; (4) the side spikelets infertile, without rudimentary sexual organs and with all structural parts very much reduced. In some cases, only the two outer glumes and a rudimentary rhachUla remain as evidence of the side spikelet (fig. 52, C and D). The relative position and size of the spikelets in the various types is diagram- matically shown in figure 53. These four conditions of fertility, previously recognized, have remained practically stable since they were first described. For this reason, and because they have been constantly used in all early classifications, they A Classification of the Cultivated Varieties of Barley 391 are of the greatest taxonomic value. Some intermediates between these stages have been described from time to time by different authors, especially Kornicke (1885). Most of these which were the results of crosses have proved to be unstable and have gone out of existence as varieties. Crosses between two of the above-named conditions of fertility give in the second generation practically all steps between the two parent types, but these intermediates have proved heterozygous in future generations and have broken up in a similar manner to the original first- generation cross. In the present classification, these four conditions of fertility are used as the first and most important character in the subdivision of cultivated barleys, for three reasons: (1) stability in all environmental conditions; (2) ease of recognition; and (3) weight given by all earlier investigators. A BCD Fig. 52. the structure of two-rowed barleys A, Dorsal view of third condition of fertility, where side spikelets are infertile but possess all structural parts except terminal appendage of lemma; B, ventral view of same; C, dorsal view of fourth condition of fertility, where side spikelets are very rudimentary; D, ventral view of same 392 Roy Glen Wiggans Fig. 53. D E F DIAGRAMMATIC SKETCH OF CROSS SECTIONS OF SPIKES OF VARIOUS TYPES OF BARLEY A, H. vulgare (dense form*) ; B, H. vulgare (lax form); C, H. intermedium; D, H. distichon (dense form) ; E, H. distichon (lax form) ; F, H. deficient Branch-headed barleys One other structure sometimes arises in barleys, which has caused descriptions to be written of what were termed seven-rowed, eight-rowed, or nine-rowed barleys. Such a condition, which might be called a stage of fertility, is brought about by repetitions of the three spikelets at a node. In other words, instead of one series of three spikelets at each node of the rhachis, there are three series (fig. 54). In the case of the two-rowed barleys, if this occurs regularly a six-rowed barley would be produced, but instead of only three spikelets at one internode, all of which were fertile, there would be three fertile and six infertile spikelets. If the same thing were to happen in the case of the six-rowed barleys, an eighteen- rowed barley would result. At each node of the rhachis nine kernels would appear. No instances have been reported in which there was such a replication at every node. The change usually comes at or near the base of the spike, and at only a small number of nodes. A further deviation occurs when a true branch is formed which bears spikelets at A Classification of the Cultivated Varieties of Barley 393 each internode just as the main axis of the spike does. These likewise arise near the base of the spike. Occasionally such deviations as are mentioned above are more or less con- stant, but more often they are found to be variable, due to environmental conditions. In either case they have no economic importance and very little taxonomic value. Consequently they are not used in the present classifi- cation as characters of importance in separating groups or even varieties. Density The density of the spike in barley, by which is meant the number of florets to the unit length of rhachis, has been employed by all taxonomists in the classification of barleys, in one form or another. In the greater number of cases it has been given equal weight with fertility in the formation of either species or subspecies. In fact, density has been considered by many authors as a result of varying degrees of fer- tility. This, however, can easily be disproved by making comparative weights of the kernels of the lateral and central spikelets of either com- mon or erect six-rowed varieties. There is .just as much difference between these two groups of spikelets in the erect varieties as in the common. The groups according to density have gen- erally been divided into dense and lax forms. For the sake of varietal descrip- tion, Kornicke (1885) even mentioned a division of the dense forms into dense and very dense. Fig. 54. two-bowed barley A, Spike of branch-headed two-rowed barley; B, one internode of the rhachis with its abnormalities 394 Roy Glen Wiggans >J It was not until Atterberg (1899) presented his new system of classifica- tion that the density of the spike was made a character of minor importance. In the earlier works, density and fertility were given about the same weight. In Atterberg's new system, density was considered only after the characters of terminal appendage, outer glume, fer- tility, and side spikelets. * Following Atterberg, both Beaven and the investi- gators at Svalof went back to the old system of considering fertility and den- sity as practically of equal importance. In Harlan's recent paper (1918), density is again employed only as a distinguish- ing characteristic between subvarieties. That there is a decided variation in this character of the spike in barley varieties cannot be denied. The diffi- culty in the use of this character lies in the intergradations between the dense and the lax forms. In a large collection of barleys it is possible to find prac- tically all degrees of density, from the very lax to the very dense. This diffi- culty has been mentioned by earlier writers. Kornicke, however, based his several subdivisions on the variation in the density of the spike. In the present classification, density is used in the sep- aration of rather large groups of com- mercial varieties but is not considered as important as either fertility, adher- ence of glumes to the caryopsis, terminal appendage, or color. 1 Fig. 55. relative length of rhachis internodes of barley of different densities ( x 6) A, Lax; B, erect; C, very dense Length of internodes of rhachis The length of the internodes of the rhachis varies directly with, and is the de- ciding factor in, density. This character A Classification of the Cultivated Varieties of Barley 395 Fig. 56. variation in the angle op inclination ov kernel with rhachis A, Chevalier; B, Goldthorpe; C, Fan barley 396 Roy Glen Wiggans has been used in the determination of density by several investigators, especially Atterberg (1899) and Harlan (1914). Atterberg used the aver- age length of the internodes as the chief character in separating his sub- varieties. In the present classification, the length of internodes has been found very useful. In two-rowed forms, three quite distinct groups were found centering around the lengths 3.3, 2.5, and 1.7 centimeters to ten internodes, or, in other words, giving a ratio of almost 2:1.5:1 (fig. 55). In the six-rowed forms the very dense group was not so distinct. Varia- tions from the general averages were found in many cases. These lesser variations can be used only in descriptions of varieties under like environ- mental conditions, and would not necessarily hold if the specimens were grown in different localities. The larger differences, however, are little influenced bv environment and can consequently be used in classifica- tion with a considerable degree of certainty. Fig. 57. variations in the attitude of the spike in lax and dense forms A Classification of the Cultivated Varieties of Barley 397 Angle of inclination of kernel The angle of inclination of the kernel is only another expression of density. It increases directly with the density and inversely with the length of the internode. The shorter the internode, the greater is the angle of inclination of the kernel (fig. 56). This character is, how- ever, harder to determine and less accurate than the length of the in- ternode. For this reason, length of internode is given preference in the present study in the determination of density. The angle of inclination, nevertheless, has been used by the Svalof investigators in describing varieties. Attitude of spike The variations in the attitude or the relative position of the spike in regard to the culm, some of which are shown in figure 57, are likewise closely correlated with the length of the internodes of the rhachis, and for this reason may be disregarded in most cases. They are of value in descriptions of varieties and in the comparison of widely different types. One advantage which this character in its extreme conditions has over the length of the rhachis internodes is that of ease in deter- mination. It is not reliable, how- ever, except under very favorable growing and ripening conditions, and is used in the present classi- fication only in connection with the HORDEUM SPONTANEUM A, Entire spike; B, one internode of rhachis with spikelets attached 398 Roy Glen Wiggans length of the internode. This character has been used in connection with density by practically all previous investigators. Articulation of internodes of rhachis In the wild types of barley known at present, the rhachis separates at maturity into as many segments as there are internodes in the rhachis. This separation is by disarticulation and not by rupture (fig. 58). Each separate segment remains attached to one spikelet. In the cultivated types of barley this separation does not take place; the rhachis either remains entire, or, if threshed, may be broken to pieces by rupture but seldom by disarticulation. In either case, however, no part of it remains with the spikelets. Nevertheless, there is considerable variation in this character of the rhachis in cultivated barleys. Although no part of the rhachis remains with the threshed grain, there is a tendency in certain varieties for the rhachis to separate easily into the various segments at maturity. This difference is a matter of degree, and as a consequence cannot be used as an important taxonomic character. But it has con- siderable value in varietal distinctions, and is used in that connection in the present paper. This character has not been used by previous investigators either as a group characteristic or as a varietal difference. SPIKELET CHARACTERS The spikelet in the case of barley presents several characters which are very important from the standpoint of classification, second only to the two principal spike characters already discussed. The most valuable spikelet characters in barley are those of the caryopsis, the glumes, and the rhachilla. These present wide differences, many of which have been found to remain constant under all environmental conditions. They have found second place in classifications because of difficulty in determination, and in some cases of intermediacy The grain The term grain, as used in this paper, when applied to hulled barleys includes both the caryopsis and the adhering lemma and palea; but when the term is applied to hull-less varieties, only the caryopsis is con- A Classification of the Cultivated Varieties of Barley 399 sidered. In other words, grain is the term applied to the threshed product. The grain of barley presents several important characters, both com- mercially and taxonomically — composition, size, shape, and color. Corn-position The composition of barley grain of the hulled varieties is a subject that has been given much study in connection with malting. The composition of hull-less varieties has not, however, been given equal consideration. For this reason, and because the same variations occur in each form, data for only the hulled type are given herein. Beaven (1902), and Le Clerc and Wahl (1909), report a large number of analyses of barleys. From these data it is apparent that composition is influenced much more by environment, rainfall, temperature, sunshine, and fertilizers, than by the variety. The following table from Le Clerc and Wahl illustrates this fact: Variety and State Water (per cent) Fat (per cent) Fiber (per cent) Starch (per cent) Protein (per cent) Hulls (per cent) Weight of 1000 grains (grams) Ash (per cent) Bay Brewing California Kansas Two-rowed 8.23 10.32 8.82 10.00 2.06 2.02 2.15 2.23 6.72 7.31 5.52 5.38 58.23 59.66 60.38 55.91 9.77 13.69 10.66 17.69 14.46 15.00 11.08 11.70 35.82 30.56 35.28 35.07 3.03 3.41 2.72 Kansas 3.13 The difference in the composition of the same variety in different localities is much greater than the difference in the composition of different varieties in the same locality. This is especially true of water, protein, and ash contents. These data verify previous work along the same line. Regardless of this truth, there is a strong tendency for some varieties to possess heritable differences in composition. This character may in some instances be used in differentiating varieties that are grown under exactly the same environment, but in a classification of barley varieties it has little place. In the present investigation the composition of the grain is not used. Size The average size of the grain has been used by agronomists generally in describing varieties and strains, but the differences are usually very 400 Roy Glen Wiggans small in closely related samples, making its value doubtful. It is, however, more 1 significant in the case of widely different groups. But in such instances other more reliable and less variable characters are usually present. For these reasons, and because it varies greatly with the environment, it is used in the present classification only in varietal descriptions. The variation of the size of grain within a variety may, however, be significant as an aid in determining the groups to which a variety belongs, if the sample is threshed. All grains are of approximately the same size in the two-rowod groups, while in the six-rowed groups one-third of the grains are noticeably h.rger than the other two-thirds, and in the inter- mediate group one-third are approximately twice the size of the other two-thirds. These distinctions are valuable only in connection with threshed grain. In the case of threshed samples of hull-less types, this variation in size may be the only way of distinguishing two-rowed from six-rowed varieties. With threshed samples of hulled types, however, the shape of the grain, as described later, is more reliable in determining groups. Shape The difference in .shape of the grain between the two-rowed and the six-rowed hulled types has become well established as a group distinction (fig. 59). The grains from the lateral spikelets are all more or less twisted in the six-rowed varieties, while those from the central spikelets are all symmetrical in contour. In the two-rowed varieties all the grains are symmetrical in contour, since they are produced by the central spikelets. There is a difference even between the shape of the grains of the two- rowed varieties and the grains of the central spikelets of the six-rowed varieties. The grains of the central spikelets of the six-rowed varieties are broadest near the tip, while those of the two-rowed varieties are broadest near the base. This difference has been used by the Swedish investigators as a group distinction, and is used in the present investiga- tion only for a study of threshed grain. It has no value in identifying threshed samples of hull-less barley, because all grains are symmetrical, due to lack of compression by the glumes. The differences in shape to be found between varieties in the lesser groups are very small and must be based on measurements of the various A Classification of the Cultivated Varieties of Barley ' 401 Fig. 59 A, Grain of two-rowed barley; B, grain of lateral spikelets of six-rowed barley DIFFERENCE IN APPEARANCE OF VENTRAL VIEW, OF GRAIN OF TWO-ROWED BARLEY AND OF GRAIN OF LATERAL SPIKELETS OF SIX-ROWED BARLEY dimensions. The most reliable and least influenced by environmental conditions, as found by Harlan (1914), is in length. By this measurement it is possible in a few instances to distinguish between certain very similar varieties or strains. This character is used only in varietal description in the present classification. Color The color of both the caryopsis and the glumes (lemma and palea) has been used in practically all classifications that have appeared. The use, however, has not been consistent, probably because the nature of the pigmentation of barley was not understood. The following colors have been used in classifications by various investigators: white, yellow, black, violet, purple, and blue-gray. The use of color by Beaven (1902) may be given as a typical instance: Colour of (1) the paleae*; (2) the seed (caryopsis). (a) Yellow or white paleae and seed. (b) Yellow or white paleae with bluish-grey seed. (c) Brown paleae. (d) Black paleae. The colour of the seed (caryopsis) when naked in the two latter cases also varies. *Beaven used the term paleae to include both lemma and palea. 402 Roy Glen Wiggans It remained for Harlan (1914) to make a detailed study of the pig- mentation of barleys. This work has aided materially in giving an understanding of the variations in color, and in clearing up inconsistencies. As a result of his work, Harlan found that all pigmentation was the result of only two pigments, anthocyanin and a melanin-like pigment. He found four color conditions to exist as a result of the total absence or the different location and combination of the pigments, as follows: 1. (a) Hulled varieties without pigment in either lemma or aleurone layer. (b) Hull-less varieties without pigment in the aleurone layer or in the pericarp. Either of these conditions results in a white or a yellow barley. * 2. (a) Hulled varieties with a blue aleurone layer showing through the superimposed lemma. (b) Hull-less varieties with a blue aleurone layer showing through a pericarp containing no pigment. Either of these conditions results in a blue barley. 3. (a) Hulled varieties with purple lemmas. (b) Hull-less varieties with blue aleurone and red pericarp. Either of these conditions results in a purple barley. 4. (a) Hulled varieties with black lemmas, (b) Hull-less varieties with black pericarp. Either of these conditions results in a black barley. Another color condition sometimes appears in' immature white or yellow barleys. The lack of maturity cautees the development of a greenish color which is probably not due to any pigment. The blue and purple color -conditions mentioned above are due to one pigment, anthocyanin. In an acid condition this appears red and in an alkaline condition it appears blue. The combination of the two produce purple. The black color is due to the melanin-like pigment, which is unchanged by treatment with either an acid or an alkali. The brown color as used in some classifications is without doubt a black, and consequently has in most cases, if not in all, very little taxonomic value. Color as used in the present classification follows the grouping as given above. Because of the ease of recognition and the distinct condition of color, it is given an important place herein in making the various groups. The blue condition is the only one which is at times difficult to recognize. In the case of hulled barleys, the color may be obscured by weathering A Classification of the Cultivated Varieties of Barley 403 at harvest time unless conditions are very favorable. In these instances it is necessary to remove the glumes in order to detect the color. If there is still doubt in regard to the presence or the absence of the blue pigment, the question may be determined by a simple chemical test which consists in dropping into a weak acid solution some kernels whose seed coats have been cut through. In a few minutes, according to the strength of the solution, a pink ring will appear in the region of the aleurone layer if any pigment is present; if no pigment is present there will be no color. If barleys under study are immature, another difficulty may arise in determining color, since pigmentation is developed in the last stages of maturity. If harvest takes place too soon the development is somewhat arrested, and this may cause difficulty. Pigmentation likewise occurs in other parts of the plant, particularly in the leaves and the stems. The pigment concerned is usually, if not always, anthocyanin. The appearance of coloration is, however, not normal in most cases and is never reliable as a taxonomic character. It usually appears as a result of arrested development, hastened maturity, or other abnormal conditions due to malnutrition. The lemma, 6 or flowering glume No other single structure in barley gives so many morphologically important characters as does the lemma. Some of the characters of this structure have been used by all investigators who have attempted either classifications or descriptions since the time of Linnaeus. Their relative importance has not been the same in all cases, but without exception the separation of large groups has been made by the use of one or more of the lemma characters. The color of the lemma has already been discussed in connection with the color of grains, and need only be mentioned here. The remaining important lemma characters, the variations of which are constant in different varieties or groups, are the adherence of the lemma and the palea to the caryopsis, the terminal appendage, the number of nerves, the barbing of the lateral nerves, and the base. These characters are discussed in the above order. 6 The term lemma is used throughout this paper instead of the term flowering glume. • Not only is lemma a shorter term than flowering glume, but it serves to distinguish this structure from the outer glumes of the spikelet. It is also the term now commonly used by agronomists. It is, however, morphologically the same as the outer, or empty, glumes, all of which are reduced structures on the main axis of the spikelet. The palea differs from the other glumes of the spikelet by arising from the secondary axis of the spikelet (fig. 60). 404 Roy Glen Wiggans Adherence of lemma and palea to caryopsis Two very different and easily distinguishable conditions exist in regard to the adherence of the lemma and the palea to the caryopsis. The condition that is probably the more characteristic and the more primitive is the one in which both the lemma and the palea are grown fast to the caryopsis at ma- turity. This union takes place near the time of maturity, when the caryopsis has reached its maximum size. Varieties with this characteristic are known as hulled bar- leys. In contrast to these, some varieties fail to form a union between the lemma and palea and the cary- opsis. In such cases the caryopsis at maturity is easily separated from the lemma and the palea. Varieties with this characteristic are known as hull-less, or naked, barleys. Fig. 60. diagrammatic sketch of barley spikelet These contrasting 1, Rhachis, or primary axis of spike; 2, primary axis of spike- characters were first let; 3, outer glumes; 4, lemma of flowering glume; 5, awn; 6, rprorf l Pf ] K v t j nn „ P11 « palea; 7, stamens; 8, pistils; 9, rhachilla recorded Dy .Linnaeus (1753). By their use he made two groups each of lax six-rowed and lax two-rowed barleys, but did not consider them sufficiently important for the establishment of species. They have since been used in all classifications as import- ant taxonomic characters. A Classification of the Cultivated Varieties of Barley 405 There is never any question in determining this character in mature grain because intermediates do not occur. Even in crosses the inter- mediate condition is not found, a fact which is not true with many other characters in hybrids. No established variety from crosses of hulled and hull -less types shows intermediacy. Because this character can be readily observed both in threshed and in un- threshed grain, and because of the total lack of intermediates, it is second to no other character taxo- nomically; but because of precedence and the probable evolutionary development, it is given second place in the present classification. Terminal appendage The terminal append- age of the lemma in barleys may be divided into thvee types: the normal, or awned (fig. 66), the awnless (fig. 68), and the hooded (fig. 67, B and D). The normal type is produced simply by an extension of the vascular system of the lemma into a long, pointed proc- ess known as the awn, or beard. The awns of most barleys are barbed from the base to the tip. This, however, does not hold for all varie- ties. A few cultivated varieties have smooth awns (fig. 61, B), and many more are being produced by hybridization. The smooth-awned VARIATION IN BARBING OF AWNS A, Barbed; B, smooth 406 Roy Glen Wiggans character seems to be of recent origin, as it was not described by the early writers on this subject. Recently Kornicke (1885), Regel (1908), and Harlan (1918) have described this condition as characteristic of some varieties. Professor F. P. Bussell, of the Department of Plant Breeding at Cornell University, has recently produced a smooth-awned type from a cross between two varieties with barbed awns. This character, whenever found, seems to be constant and is of considerable importance in distinguishing varieties, and is so used in the present classifi- cation. In certain varieties the awns are only sparingly barbed or are barbed only for a part of their length. Usually the upper third is barbed in such cases, while in other varieties, particularly in the dense-headed types, the barbing is very profuse. Thus, considerable variation is found in the degree of barbing. These lesser variations have little taxonomic value, as they are usually associated with more important characters. They have never been used in previous classifications. In the present classification they are used in varietal description. A marked difference likewise occurs in both the deciduousness and the rigidity of the awns of different varieties. Some varieties, when mature, drop their awns very readily, and by threshing time the spikes are practi- cally bare of awns. Most varieties, however, hold their awns very securely, some being broken off with difficulty even by threshing. This second condition is usually associated with a very rigid, coarse awn. These differences can be used only in varietal descriptions. Some noticeable variations occur between varieties in the length and in the width of awns, but these are significant in varietal descriptions only when associated with other characters. In the awnless type, as the term signifies, the lemma ends either in a point or bluntly. The awnless lemmas are always found on the sterile side spikelets of the two-rowed barleys, and occasionally on the fertile side spikelets of the six-rowed. The awnless type was described by Kornicke (1885), and has been used since in describing certain types and often in differentiating large groups and even species. The third type of terminal appendage is found on what are known as hooded barleys. Here the normal awn is replaced by a trifurcate structure known as the hood. The morphological significance of this A Classification of the Cultivated Varieties of Barley 407 appendage is not fully understood, but it seems that there is a partial repetition of the spikelets of a node, the three parts of the appendage representing the lemmas of the three spikelets. These glume-like structures frequently bear rudimentary sexual organs, but are seldom if ever fertile. The origin of this type is unknown, but it dates well back in cultivated barleys, since it was described by both Schlibler (1818) and Seringe (1819). Since that time it has been used by all investigators along this line. The hooded condition usually appears on all fertile spikelets, but in certain six-rowed forms only the median spikelets are hooded. The only varia- tion of importance in the hooded types is that found in the location of the hood. Commonly this structure is sessile, but in certain varieties it is elevated on an awn to a greater or less extent. The three main types of barleys in regard to terminal appendage are of very great importance in the systematic grouping of cultivated barleys, both because of their constancy and because of the ease of determination. They are second only to fertility and adherence of the lemma and palea to the caryopsis, in the present classification. Number of nerves of lemma It is generally characteristic of the entire Hordeum genus to have five nerves in the lemma — one dorsal, and two lateral on either side, all of which are usually rather obscure. In cultivated varieties of barley, the number occasionally is increased from five to seven, and in some cases the nerves become very conspicuous. The latter variation is a matter of degree and can be used only in varietal descriptions. The increase in the number of nerves is, however, very definite and noticeable. For this reason it could be used in making more important divisions were it not for the fact that it occurs very infrequently. Neither the variation in the number of nerves nor that in their prominence has been used in previous classifications for the purpose of forming main divisions or in describing varieties. In the present classification these variations are employed in order to separate certain varieties in the larger groups. Barbing of lateral nerves of lemma The variation in the character of the two lateral nerves next to the dorsal nerve was first pointed out by Neergaard (1889). After careful 408 Roy Glen Wiggans study, he found that in certain varieties these nerves were toothed or barbed, while in other varieties they were perfectly smooth (fig. 62). This character proved to be constant and reliable. As a consequence it has been used widely in Sweden in recent years in differentiating certain varieties which were similar in all readily observable characters. Some workers following Neergaard, particularly Broili (1906), have held that this character was not constant, while others have supported Neergaard. As a consequence of this doubt as to the constancy of the character, it has not been used widely by recent investigators. In the present classification it is used to make rather important divi- sions of agricultural varieties, particularly of the two-rowed sorts. In employing this char- acter, it is necessary in many cases to use a hand lens in order to be sure of the pres- ence or the absence of the barbs. The character varies in a similar manner to the Fig. 62. VARIATION IN BARBING OF LATERAL NERVES OF LEMMA A, Smooth lateral nerves; B, barbed lateral nerves barbs on the awns. In some varieties the barbs extend along the lateral nerves nearly to the base of the kernel, while in other varieties there is a complete absence of barbs. Between these two conditions there are practically all degrees of barbing. This character, however, seems to be independent of the barbing of the awns, as some smooth-awned varieties have barbed lateral nerves and many varieties with barbed awns have smooth lateral nerves. Base of lemma The variation in the shape of the base of the lemma was first used to distinguish large groups of barleys by the Swedish investigators. They differentiated the erect compact forms from the nodding lax forms of two- rowed barleys by the character of the base. The first work on the Swedish system was begun by Atterberg (1889) and Bolin (1893). The narrow A Classification of the Cultivated Varieties of Barley 409 lax forms of the two-rowed barleys are characterized by a slight horseshoe- shaped depression at the base on the dorsal side of the kernel (fig. 63, A and B). (As reported by Atterberg and Bolin, this difference was for hulled varieties only.) Associated closely with this character is the type of basilar connection of the kernel to the rhachis. The attachment is reduced to a narrow band of tissue, which separates at maturity leaving a smooth surface. Contrasted with these two characters of the narrow Fig. 63. variation in shape of lemma base A, Dorsal view of lemma base of lax-headed barley, showing horseshoe-like depression; B, lateral view of same; C, dorsal view of lemma base of dense-headed barley, showing cross crease; D, lateral view of same lax forms, the dense erect forms have a base which is often pinched in appearance, with a transverse crease or furrow just above the point of attachment but with no horseshoe-like depression (fig. 63, C and D). The basilar connection associated with this type of lemma is broader, and when separated leaves a rougher surface than does the basilar connection of the lax forms. Although these characters have been used for differentiating only threshed two-rowed hulled types, they hold equally true for threshed six- 410 Roy Glen Wiggans rowed hulled barleys and for hull-less types which are still in the spike. Their value in classification is somewhat limited because they are associated so closely with density. The outer glumes Each spikelet in barley, in common with practically all members of the grass family, is subtended by a pair of empty glumes, or bracts (fig. 60). These glumes in the case of barley are usually covered with fine hairs, are lanceolate in shape, and end either in awn points or in short awns. However, all three of these characters of the outer glumes vary. Occasionally varieties appear with expanded outer glumes which are almost ovate in shape. This ovate shape appears in a few varieties on all six of the outer glumes, in others on the outermost two, and in rarer cases on the middle spikelet only. The shape of the outer glumes was first used by Kornicke (1885) for the separation of varieties, but was not considered of very great importance. More recently Beaven (1902) and Harlan (1918) have given it more weight as a taxonomic character. Another variation in shape of the outer glumes, which has not been previously described so far as the present writer knows, is in the ter- minal appendage. In very rare cases, hoods appear instead of awns on the two outermost outer glumes. This variation has been found in only one variety, and at present it has no value in classification. Again, varietal differences occur in the length of awn on the outer glumes. This was first illustrated by Munro and Beaven (1900). In some cases the awns on the outer glumes are almost as long as the awns on the lemmas. This variation may occur on the outer glumes of the two lateral spikelets, on the median spikelets only, or in rare cases on all three spikelets of both the two-rowed and the six-rowed types. The difference in hairiness of the outer glumes is only in degree. In many varieties, the glumes are well covered with long, straight hairs, while in many' others the hairs are much shorter and not .nearly so abundant; in rare cases the glumes are practically glabrous. These variations, so far as observations have gone, are always associated with similar but more apparent characters of the rhachilla. All the variations in the characters of the outer glumes are of minor importance in classification, either because they occur so rarely or because A Classification of the Cultivated Varieties of Barley 411 they are closely associated with other structural characters. For these reasons they are used in the present' classification only in varietal descriptions. The rhachitta The rhachilla, which is often known as the basal bristle, is the prolongation of the primary axis of the spikelet beyond the last floret — in the case of barley the only floret. The entire structure of a barley spikelet is shown diagrammatically in figure 60. In perfectly sessile barleys the rhachilla is the only evidence of the primary axis of the spikelet. It is more or less hidden in the groove on the ventral side of the kernel, remaining undisturbed in the case of hulled bar- leys when the grain is threshed. The rhachilla presents one pair of differen- tiating characters which is of very great taxonomic value. In one group of varieties the rha- chilla is short and is abundantly covered with long, straight, hairs; while in another group it is almost twice as long and is covered sparingly with short, curly hairs, giving a woolly appearance to the whole structure. This difference is illustrated in figure 64. This pair of characters, like the variation in the character of the barbing on the lateral nerves, was discovered by the Swedish investigators. They have found the' variation in the rhachilla even more reliable and of greater value than the variation in the barbing of the lateral nerves, in the identification of barley varieties grown in Sweden. In the present classi- fication this pair of characters is employed in the separation of the lesser groups of varieties. A B Fig. 64. the rhachilla' A, Long-haired rhachilla; B, short-haired rhachilla' 412 Roy Glen Wiggans Occasionally another variation occurs in the rhachilla, in that a rudi- mentary second floret is produced. This variation has been used occa- sionally in describing varieties, but, so far as the observations made in the present study go, it is of little or no value. It seems to be the result of either a sterile first floret or poor adaptation. Whenever it appears it is usually in connection with poorly developed heads, not as a characteristic of any variety or group of varieties. SUMMARY In order to eliminate possible confusion in regard to the characters used in the present classification and to gain some idea of their relative importance, the following brief summary of their use herein is given: To distinguish species and subspecies: 1. Articulation of rhachis 2. Fertility of lateral spikelets 3. Presence of sexual organs in side spikelets 4. Presence of terminal appendages on lemmas of side spikelets To distinguish the several varieties within large groups: 1. Adherence of lemma and palea to caryopsis 2. Variations in terminal appendage 3. Color 4. Density of spike as determined by a. Base of lemma, or flowering glume b. Length of rhachis internode c. Width of spike 5. Character of rhachilla 6. Presence or absence of barbs on awns 7. Habit of early growth 8. Presence or absence of barbs on lateral nerves of lemma To distinguish the subvarieties or strains within the more important varieties: 1. Attitude of spike 2. Date of emergence of awns and spikes 3. Time of maturity 4. Outer glumes 5. Grain characters: a. Composition b. Size c. Shape 6. Variations in size and color of foliage 7. Culm characters: a. Length of last internode b. Total length of cuim c. Number of nodes 8. Variation in articulate character of rhachis 9. Branch-headed character 10. Productivity Many of the last-named characters are influenced to such a degree by environment that they cannot be used alone to make differentiations, A Classification of the Cultivated Varieties of Barley 413 but when combined with other characters they may be employed in separating subvarieties. These characters are more valuable in varietal description than for any other purpose, and can be employed only for local identification. CLASSIFICATION OF BARLEY FORMS The classification as given in the following pages is very largely of cultivated varieties, this being the main purpose of the study. Some unimportant varieties are included, however, in order to make the classifica- tion more nearly complete. It has likewise been considered better to construct the keys to groups and varieties in such a way that they may easily be expanded to include new introductions and new productions which are certain to arise. For this reason, and because of a lack of specimens possessing all the possible combinations of characters, the keys are left incomplete, some divisions failing to appear in certain instances. The cultivated species of barley (fig. 65), and the one wild species {Hordeum spontaneum, fig. 58) which is most closely related, may be distinguished according to the following key: PAGE A. Rhachis articulate Hordeum sponianeum. 415 AA. Rhachis non-articulate. B. All spikelets fertile. C. Lemmas of all spikelets awned or hooded, kernels of all spikelets equal or nearly equal in size H. vulgare. 416 CC. Lemmas of central spikelets awned or hooded, lemmas of lateral spikelets bearing neither awns nor hoods, kernels of lateral spikelets much reduced in size (x) H. intermedium 1 . 430 BB. Only the central spikelets fertile. C. Lateral spikelets possessing nonfunctional rudimentary sexual organs H. distichon. 433 CC. Lateral spikelets much reduced in structural parts and possessing no rudi- mentary sexual organs H. deficiens. 443 The general relationship of the species may be graphically shown as follows: Family Genus Species Gramineae Hordeum spontaneum vulgare (x) intermedium distichon deficiens 7 The (x) before H. intermedium indicates the hybrid origin of this species, also that it is not of equal rank with the other species. A B C D Fig. 65. four cultivated species op barley A, Hordeum deficient; B, H. distichon; C, H. intermedium; D, H. vulgar e 414 A Classification of the Cultivated Varieties of Barley 415 In the present classification the number of species of cultivated varieties is placed at four, one of which, H. deficiens, is at present of lesser agronomic importance than the others. These groups are given the species distinction largely because (1) all the best evidence seems to point to the very early origin and to the parallel development of these types; (2) the numerous distinct varieties are less confusing when placed in four rather than in one species; (3) most of the earlier investigators have used more than one species. It is evident, however, that these species are not so distinct as are many species of other plants, especially in the wild state, since in many cases interspecies crosses are impossible. In barley, the species as designated in the present classification readily cross. HORDEUM SPOXTANEUM Hordeum spontaneum C. Koch (fig. 58) differs from all the cultivated forms of barley by the articulation of the rhachis. At or near maturity the rhachis separates at each node but the segments remain attached at the upper end to the spikelets. The rhachises of cultivated barleys, on the other hand, do not readily disarticulate at maturity. If the spikelets are forced apart, they break loose from the rhachis and leave it entire. It seems that in the evolution of cultivated barleys the rhachis has become solidified into a single structure. The character of the brittle rhachis is found in several wild grasses, among the most interesting of which is the wild wheat of Palestine, the possible progenitor of cultivated wheats. This characteristic makes these grasses especially adapted for reseeding, and may account for the continued existence of these forms in nature. H. spontaneum has been known to botanists for many years, having been described by Post (1883), by Boissier (1884), and by Hochstetter (1848). By both Boissier and Post it was designated as Hordeum Ithaburense. It may be briefly described as follows: Leaves weak, linear, tapering at tip; spikes awned, flattened, two- ranked; rhachis brittle, plumose; lateral spikelets pointed, without awns, staminate, pedicillate; central spikelet awned, perfect, sessile; awns very long and excessively barbed; dorsal nerves of flowering glumes of lateral spikelets smooth; outer glumes of all spikelets very hairy, awned; awns H times as long as lateral florets; rhachilla long, covered with long, straight hairs; kernel long, slender. 416 Roy Glen Wiggans The only interest in this type from an economic standpoint lies in the possibility of its being the ancestor of some if not all of the cultivated barleys. HORDEUM VULGARE Hordeum vulgare L. (figs. 66 and 67), one large species of cultivated barleys, is differentiated from the wild species just described principally a b CD Fig. 66. varieties of hordeum vulgare A and B, Dense hulled forms; C, lax hulled; D, lax hull-less by the presence of a solidified rhachis, one which holds together at maturity and remains intact even though the kernels are broken off. Another important difference between the two is found in the fertility of the spikelets. In H. vulgare all three spikelets at each node of the rhachis are fertile, thus forming six rows of fertile spikelets instead of two. The species may be briefly described as follows : A Classification of the Cultivated Varieties of Barley 417 Spike erect and nodding, six- or four-ranked according to arrangement of spikelets: rhachis, or central axis of spike, made up of a number of short internodes which are solidified at the joints; spikelets arranged in groups of three at each joint in the rhachis, all equally fertile, all awned or hooded, all sessile or nearly so, awns usually barbed; lateral nerves of flowering glumes barbed or smooth; rhachilla hairy; grains of lateral • - i*" ■)'■'■ Jtv\« ' % ' (, made. He wishes to acknowledge also his indebtedness to Mrs. W. C. Etheridge for the accurate drawings from which the color plates were made, and to C. B. Wiggans for the drawings of the structural parts of the plant. A Classification of the Cultivated Varieties of Barley 449 BIBLIOGRAPHY Atterberg, Albert. Die Erkennung der Hauptvarietaten der Gerste in den nordeuropaischen Saat- und Malzgersten. Landw. Vers. Stat. 36:23-27. 1889. Die Klassifikation der Saatgersten Nord-Europas. Landw. Vers. Stat. 39 : 77-80. 1891. Die Varietaten und Formen der Gerste. Journ. Landw. 47 : 1—44. 1899. Beaven, E. S. Varieties of barley. Fed. Inst. Brewing. Journ. 8:542- 594. 1902. Boissier, Edmoxd. Hordeum. In Flora orientalis 5 : 68G-689. 1884. Bolix, Pehr. Renodling af ett antal kornformer med olika botaniska Kannetecken. Sveriges Utsadesfor. Tidskr. 1893. Broili, Josef, t'bcr die Unterscheidung der zweizeiligen Gerste — Hordeum distichum — am Korne. Inaug. Diss., Univ. Jena. 1906. Uber die Unterscheidungsmerkmale dor Distichumgruppe (zwei- zeilige Gerste). Journ. Landw. 56: 121-139. 1908. Browx, A. J. Coloring matter in barleys. Fed. Inst. Brewing. Journ. 6:480-188. 1900. Carletox, Mark Alfred. Barley. In The small grains, p. 115-146. 1916. Derr, H. B. Barley: growing the crop. U. S. Agr. Dept. Farmers' bul. 443:1-48. 1911. Doll, J. C. Flora dcs Grossherzogthums Baden, 1 : — . 1857. Harlan, Harry. Some distinctions in our cultivated barleys with reference to their use in plant breeding. U. S. Agr. Dept. Bui. 137:1- 38. 1914. The identification of varieties of barley. U. S. Agr. Dept. Bui. 622:1-32. 1918. 450 Roy Glen Wiggans Heuze, Gustave. Les plantes alimentaires, 2 vols. 1872. Les plantes cereales, 2d ed., 2 vols. 1896-97. Hochstetter, Ch. F. Nachtraglicher Commentar zu meiner Abhand- lung: "Aufbau der Graspflanze, etc." Flora 31: 105-118, 121-135, 140-152, 154-167, 171-188. 1848. Hubert, M. The classification of brewing barley from a technical and agricultural standpoint, with special reference to its nitrogen content. Mens. Off. Renseig. Agr. Bui. 6:839-844. 1907. Jessen, C. Samenkatalog des eldenaer botanischen Garten. 1855. Kornicke, F. Die Saatgerste. Hordeum vulgare L. sensu latoire. Ztschr. Gesam. Brauw. 5 : 113-128. 1882. Handbuch des Getreidebaues (Kornicke and Werner) , 1 : 1^470. (Reference on p. 147-189.) 1885. Die hauptsachlichsten Formen der Saatgerste, p. 1-15. 1895. (Communicated by M. Kornicke.) Die Entstehung und das Verhalten neuer Getreidevarietaten. Arch, biontol. 2:393-437. 1909. Le Clerc, J. A., and Wahl, Robert. Chemical studies of American barleys and malts. U. S. Chem. Bur. Bui. 124:1-75. 1909. Linnaeus, Carl von. Hortus Upsaliensis, p. 1-306. (Reference p. 22- 23.) 1748. Hordeum. In Species plantarum, 1: 84-85. 1753. Munro, John M. H., and Beaven, E. S. Various conditions affecting the malting quality of barley. Roy. Agr. Soc. England. Journ., ser. 3: 11: 185-251. 1900. Neergaard, T. D. Bestaming a Kornets varieteter och sorter efter pa Karnorna befintliga Kannetecken. Allm. Svenska Utsadesfor. Arsber. i88q:54-61. 1889. Nilsson, A. Identification of American barleys based upon the Swedish system. Soc. Brew. Tech. Journ. 1: 263-280. 1909. A Classification of the Cultivated Varieties of Barley 451 Persival, John. Cultivated barley. In Agricultural botany, p. 500- 511. 1914. Post, George E. Hordeum. In Flora of Syria, Palestine, and Sinai, from the Taurus to Ras Muhammad, and from the Mediterranean Sea to the Syrian Desert, p. 902-903. 1883. Quante, H. Die Gerste, p. 1-195. 1913. Regel, Robert. Les orges cultivees de l'empire Russe, p. 1-39. 1906. Glattgrannige Gerste. Bur. Angew. Bot. Bui. 1 : 5-85. (Ger- man translation, p. 64-85.) 1908. Regel, Robert, and others. Bazhneiishiia formy pshenits iachmenei i sornykh rastenii Ross'ii. Bur. Angew. Bot. Bui. 3 6 : 209-282. 1910. Rumker, von. The systematic classification and naming of grain varieties for practical purposes. Deut. landw. Gesell. Jahrb. 23 : 137- 160. 1908. Schubler, Gustav. Dissertatio inauguralis botanica sistens character- isticen et descriptiones cerealium in Horto Academico Tubingensi et in Wurtembergia, p. 1-17. 1818. Schulz, August. Die Abstammung der Saatgerste. Naturf. Gesell. Halle. Mitt. 1:— . 1911. Die Saatgerste. In Die Geschichte der kultivierten Getreide, 1 : 86-116. 1913. Seringe, N. C. Monographic des Cereales de la Suisse. In Melanges botaniques, 2:65-244. 1819. Descriptions et figures des cereales europeennes. Soc. Roy. Agr. Lyon. Ann. 4:321-384. 1841^2. Voss, A. Versuch einer neuen Systematik der Saatgerste. Journ. Landw. 33:271-282. 1885. Memoir 40, Liberation of Organic Matter by Roots of Growing Plants, the sixth preceding number in this series of publications, was mailed on November 16, 1921. INDEX TO VARIETIES AND SUBVARIETIES (Synonyms and subvariety names are in italics) Abed Binder 438 Ackermans Niedebayrische 438 African (A natolia) 439 Alashier 425 Algeria 422 Algerian 424 Anatolian Black 442 Arlington Awnless 432 Asia Minor 442 Asstivum Schwarze Sommergerste 427 Austin Han no, 438 Australian 424, 438, 439, 441(2) Australian Early 421(2), 438 Australian Hollischauer 438 Australian Hollischauer (Hanna) 439 Australian Imperial 422 Australian Loosdorfer 438 Australian Loosdorfer (Early) 424 Australian Prosowetz 424 Australian Winter 421, 423 Austrian 424, 440 .4 ustrian Hanna 438 Austrian Proskowetz 438 Ballon 439 Bavarian 438, 439, 441 Bay Brewing 424 Bay Brewing 424 Bayerische Landgerste 438 Beardless 427 BeUli 422, 424 Bergstrasseh 439 Bernards 421 Bestehorns Diamant 441 Bestehorns Kaiser 441 Black Hulless 428 Black Summer 426 Black Two-rowed 442 Black Two-rowed 421 Black Winter 426 Blaue Excelsior 428 Blaue Na r Me Gerste 428 Blue Hulless 428 Blue Ribbon 423 Blue Virginia 424 Bohemia 438 Bohemian 439 Bohmische Gerste 441 Brachyura Kurze Sechszeilige Gerste 423 Breustedts Horzer Gerste 441 California Chevalier 438, 439(2), 440 California Moravian 424, 438 Calif ornian 424, 425 California Portuguese 423, 424 California Prolific 424 Canada 423(2) Canadian 438 Canadian 21 423 Canadian Fancy 423 Canadian Western 423 Canary Island 422 Cape 424 Cawnpur 422 Challenge 439 Chevalier 439 Chevalier 438, 439, 440 Chevalier (Kinvers) 439 Chile 441 Chili 424 Chilian 426 Chilian 426 Chilian Brewing 424 Chilian Chevalier 439 Chiligerste 438 Chinese .{King Kua) 438 C.I. 519 424 C.I. 595 429 C. 1.702 433 C.I. 703 428 Coeleste 427 Coerulescens Ser 427 Common 423 Cornell Selection 1 433 Cornell Selection 8 433 Cornell Selection 9 433 Eagle 423 Early Chevalier 446 Eckendorfer Mammoth Winterger^te 422 English Chevalier 439 Fan Barley 441 Featherston 421 Featherston 425 Featherston 507 423 Featherston Selections 423 Frankergerste Stamm 438 453 454 Roy Glen Wiggans PAGE Frederisksons Gerste 441 French 438(2) French Early 421, 423(2) French Gerste aus Denmark 421 Friedrichswerlher Mammoth Wintergerste . 422 Fruhwirts Fruhe Goldthorpe 441 Gatami 426 Gaza 422 German 438, 440 German Bavaria 438(2) German Hanna 422, 438 German Heils Granken 438 German Nole Early 438 German Winter 425 Gerste aus Ajaccio 423 Gerste aus Cypern 423 Gerste aus Dalekartien 423 Gerste aus dem Banal 438 Gerste aus der Krim 443 Gerste aus der Mandschursi 423 Gerste aus Japan 423 Gerste aus Lulea 423 Gerste aus Morocco 421 Gerste aus Norwegen 423 Golden Drop 439 Goldethorpe 441 Gold Foil 438, 439 Gold Melonen Chevalier gerste 439 Goldthorpe 440 Goldthorpe 441 Grecian 424 Grecian Hordeum sp 425 Groniger 425 Guatemalan Tontonicipan 424 Guy Mayle 428 Guzerat 422 Hanakische Gerste 438 Hanna 436 Hanna 437 Hanna x Vermont Champion 438 Hannchen 437 Hansche 438 Hansee Hulless . 427 Heavy Moldavian 423 Heines Verbessert Chevalier 438 Heines Vierzeilige Gerste . . . . 423 Hitakawa 426 Hordeum distichum 441 Hordeum distichum erectum 441, 442 Hordeum distichum nutans 441 Horn 439 Hulless 429 Hungarian 441 Hungarian Hanna 438 PAGE Hungarian Loosdorfer 438 Idaho 439 Idaho Callow 423 Idaho Winter 425 Idaho Winter 425 Imperial 441 Imp. Manchuria 423 India Cawnpur 422 Indian Sind 422, 423 India Punjake 422 Ingrescens 442 Italian 438 Italian Hulless 428 Japanese 438 Japanese Hitakawa 426 Jerusalem Gerste 438 Jewel 441 Jutlandische Gerste 438 Kleine Warthebruch 423 Klein Wanzlehener Wintergerste 422 Kwassitzer Hanna 438 Lechrainer 438 Leiorr hynchum (Kcke.) 427 Long-grained Winter 421 Loosdorfer 438 Mahndorfer 438 Mahrische 438 Maltese Island 424 Mammoth Winter 422 Manchuria 423, 439 Manchurian 423 Manchuria =Oderbrucker 422 Manchuria-Oderbrucker 423 Manchuria Selection 420 Manchuria Selections .' 423 Manchury 423(2) Manchury x Vermont Champion 440 Manchury x Vermont Champion 440 Mariout 423 Mariout 424 Marwar 422(2) Mezoeijes Handgerste aus Ungarn 421 Minnesota 6 423 Montana 425 Moravian 441 Moroccan 421 Moroccan 422, 424 Naked Barley 427 Naked Spring 443 Naked Spring 427 Nepal 429 Nepal Hulless 433 Netherlands 438 Netherlans 425 A Classification of the Cultivated Varieties of Barley 455 New Burton Malting 441 (2) New Zealand 439 Niederbayerische Landgerste 438 Nigrum Schwarze Sommergerste 427 Noles Bohemia 438 Noles Imperialgerste Type A 441 Noles Moravia Chevalier gerste 440 Norwegian 1 421 Norwegian II 423 Norwegian Bamsleyg 423 Norwegian Bjorneleyg 421, 423 Norwegian Imperialleyg 441 O.A. C. 21 423 O.A.C.21 423 Oderbrucker 423(2) Odessa 423(3) Ogara 426 Ouchac 421, 424, 439 Peru 424 Pjauengerste 441 Pfelzer 439 Poda 424 Primus 441 Princess 438, 440 Probsteier Perlgerste 439 Proskowetz 438 Pure Bred Spring 438 Red River 423 Red's Triumph 423 Rieser Gerste 439 Roumanian Autumn 423 Roumanian Chevalier 438 Roumanian Common 438 Roumanian Hanna 438 Roumanian Spring 423 Rud. Bethges 438 Rumanian Autumn 423 Russian Courland 445 Russian Livonian 423 Sandrel 424 Sangatsuka 428 Schaley's 439 Schlesische Zeilgerste 423 Schwarze Zweizeilige Gerste 442 Scottische Annat 439 Scottische Perlchevaliergerste 439 Scottish Chevalier 439 Scottish Lothian Chevalier . 438 Scottish Lothian Standwell 441 Sechsamter 438 Selection 44 446 Selection 259 427 Selection 308 430 Selection J#3 437 PAGE Selection 503 440 Selection 607 443 Selection 614 443 Selection 616 443 Selection 621 446 Selection 622 446 Selection 625 447 Selection 626 447 Selection 657 446 Short Six-rowed Winter 426 Siberian 423 Silver King 423(2), 439 Smyrna 438 Smyrna 424, 439 Smyrna 521 439 Smyrna Yerli 424 South African Cape Early 423, 424 South African Golden Grain 439 South African Six-rowed 424 South Russian 423(2) Spanish Sierra Yiqua 422 S. P. I. 18922 421 S. P. I. 40326 433 S. P. I. 40645 423 S. P. I. 40648 , 423 S. P. I. 40649 423 S. P. I. 41153. 443 S. P. I. 41155 446 S. P. I. 41156 429 S. P. I. 41157 429 S. P. I. 41158 422 S. P. 1.41159 426 S. P. I. 4H60 422 S. P. I. 4H61 422 S. P. I. 41162 443 Spiegelgerste aus Utuna 441 Standwell 441 Steigun 438 Success 427 Success 427 Success Beardless 427 Svalbf 438 Svalbf Chevalier gerste 440 Svalbf Hannchen 438 Svalbf Princess 438 Svalbf 's Primus 442 Svalbf 's Svanhals 441 Svalbf's Swanneck 441 Svanhals 441 Swedish Chevalier II 440 Swedish Gold 438 Swedish Gotland 438 Swedish Oland 438(2) Swedish Princess 438 456 Roy Glen Wiggans PAGE Swedish Six-rowed 423 Swedish Upland 442 Swiss 424, 425 Swiss Spring 423, 438 Syrian 440 Syrian 438 Tasmanian 442 Tasmanian Battledore 439 Tasmanian Ideal 442 Telli 425 Tenkan 425 Tripolitan 422 Triumph 425 Tunisian 422, 424 Turkish 439 Turkish Afrokarchissar 439 Turkish Alasheir 424 Turkish Alba7iian 423 Turkish Anatolian 439 Turkish (Rhodes to Sea of Marmora) 424 Turkish Smyrna 438 Turkish (Smyrna Highland) 438 Turkish Smyrna Highland 439 Turkisk Smyrna Lowland 425 Turkish Syrian 440 PAGE Two-rowed Black 438 Ungarische Hanna 438 Unterfrankische Z uchlaus-schus&gerste.. . . 438 Upland 442 Utah Winter 425 Utah Winter 425 Vermont Champion 438 Violaceum 428 Virginia Black Hulless 428 Virginia Hooded 427 Virginia Selection 4 441 Virginia Selection 7 441 Virginia Selections '4 427 Virginia Selection 647 441 Webbs Bartlose 441 Wessling 439 Wessling's Trounengerste 440 White Hulless 429 Wisconsin 5 423 Wisconsin 6 423 Wisconsin Pedigree 423 Wisconsin Winter 424 Wustermarsch Wintergerste 422 Yerli 424 Zeiness Vered 438 L Z ££T ° F EGRESS 002 682 185™ |