BEING THREE PAPERS UPON THIS SUBJECT, ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED BETWEEN THE YEARS 1854 and 1861. BY P. S. HAMILTON, | Barrister at Law, and Chief Commissioner op Mines for the Province of Nova Scotia. gttontvrsil: PRINTED RY JOHN LOVELL, ST. NICHOLAS STREET. 1804. UNION OF THE COLONIES OF BEING THREE PAPERS UPON THIS SUBJECT, ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED BETWEEN THE YEARS 1854 and 1851. BY P. S. HAMILTON, Barrister at Law, and Chief Commissioner of Minks for the Provings of Nova Scotia. ponfrtal: PRINTED BY JOHN LOVELL, ST, NICHOLAS STREET, 18G4. UNION OF THE COLONIES. INTRODUCTION. The dates appended to the several titles of the following papers indicate the time at which they were respectively published. They are the results of perhaps the most note¬ worthy, and certainly the most public efforts which, ever since 1849, the author has, within what seemed not beyond the possible limits of his direct or indirect influence, persistently made, on every seemingly fitting occasion, to advance the great political scheme which these essays advocate. They were, at the respective times of their original publication, pretty generally circulated by the author himself among the more prominent statesmen and politicians of the North Amer¬ ican Colonies, and, to a more limited extent, of England also. With these classes they so far met with favor as to be, each of them, republished in full in several of the British Amer¬ ican political journals and other periodicals, and in part by several of those of the United Kingdom. Since the first of these little essays was offered to the public, the popular min d has become comparatively familiarized with the subject of a British American Colonial Union, and the minds of most of our public men are probably matured there¬ upon. Indeed, many points upon which the honest and painstaking student of Colonial politics then feared to offer his convictions to the public lest they might be scouted as those of an eccentric theorist, have, of late, come to be gravely and generally discussed as practical questions ; and what, in 1854, might have been, and in some instances per- 4 haps was, laughed at as the scheme of a visionary, is now ably advocated by the leading minds of the country. In preparing the following papers, the author considered that he was about to address minds, to many of whom the subject matter of these papers was new. He therefore endeavored to suggest rather than instruct, and purposely refrained from entering upon the discussion of many matters of detail upon which his own opinion was matured, considering that to do so would then be premature, and that the views which, upon such matters, he would have to propound, might alarm the preconceived notions, or prejudices, of some classes whom he addressed. But of late the discussion of the subject of Colonial Union—discussion of the most able, widely spread, and popular character—has gone far beyond where it is left by the following papers. In fact, we have ceased to be merely theoretical; we are becoming practical. Whilst these lines are being written, a Convention, comprising the leading statesmen of British America, has already met at Quebec to settle the basis of a Union of these Colonies. Under these circumstances, it may now be not unreason¬ ably asked,—why republish the following papers ? When the importance—nay, the necessity, of a Union of the Colo¬ nies is conceded, and when our leading statesmen are actually engaged in arranging the terms of that Union, why republish works mainly devoted to advocating that necessity, and which treat only generally of the practical details ? The answer may be given in very few words. The author has very fre¬ quently of late been applied to for copies of some one, or all, of these essays; but all have been, for some time, out of print, and therefore not procurable. Again, whatever the result of the Quebec Convention, it is probable that the reso¬ lutions of that body will be submitted to the several Culonial Legislatures for approval before being acted upon. It is possible that the scheme matured by the Convention may be opposed, in whole or in part, in some of those Legislatures. Under these circumstances, the writer considers ‘ it the duty of every person entertaining such earnest convictions as he does of the absolute necessity of the projected Union for the well-being of his country, to do anything and every¬ thing he honestly can which may, by any possibility, aid in the consummation of that Union. It will be perceived that there is a repetition of some ideas in the course of these essays; and some of the arguments urged in favor of Union were more particularly applicable at the period when they were enunciated than they seem to be at the present time. But as to eliminate all the passages to which such objections apply would be to produce a new work, the author prefers reproducing these brochures in their original form. Referring to the earliest of these pamphlets written in 1854—the author believes that he was the first to correct an error in which the public had been content to rest — universally *so far as any public announcement to the con¬ trary could show—down to that period, relative to the mate¬ rial progress of the North American Colonies as a whole. It was there shown that, notwithstanding the constantly reite¬ rated opinion to the contrary, the growth of these Pro¬ vinces in population, commerce, wealth, and political impor¬ tance generally had, down to 1851, been much more rapid than that of the United States, and therefore of any other part of America. The argument based upon the statistic which were furnished to prove this fact, has still greater force now than it had then. In the ten years from 1851 to 1861, the Provinces of Canada, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, and Prince Edward Island, together added consider¬ ably more than a third to their population, it having increased from 2,253,000 in 1851, to 3,170,211 in 1861. During the same decade the trade of these Provinces has about doubled. In 1851 their imports amounted jointly to £6,833,855 stg.; their exports to £4,189,051 stg. In 1861 their imports had attained the value of £11,581,680 stg.; their exports =£9,641,947 stg. We have abundant evidence that in every other respect, the progress of these Colonies has been equally satisfactory. It will be seen that, in warning British American Consti¬ tution makers against the evils of Federalism as exemplified in the United States, the author has ventured to predict the eaily and complete failure of the Federal Constitution in that country. His predictions have been fully verified at an earlier period than even he had supposed. It will also be seen that the probable aggressions of the United States republic have been dwelt upon as a sufficient reason why, for defensive purposes alone, these Colonies should be consoli¬ dated. Some persons may suppose that the dissolution of that Republic—and who is there outside of the Northern States who can doubt that it is irrevocably dissolved ?_ren¬ ders this argument now valueless. The writer does not think so. Before the severance of the Northern and Southern States, the well-known opposition of the latter to any further u annexation ” of non-slaveholding territory furnished a par¬ tial guarantee that that Republic, as a whole, would not molest our British American soil. But we have no such guarantee now. When the Northern States come out of the present war, their ambition for territorial extension will unquestion¬ ably direct their desires towards British America more ear¬ nestly than they ever were before. If, on coming out of the struggle in which they are now engaged, those States do not find themselves too much enervated to attempt further active aggressions, there is a strong probability that, without the Colonial Union now under consideration , they will attempt conquests on their Northern frontier. There is no proba¬ bility whatever that they could succeed in securing perma¬ nent possession of any part of the organized Colonies of British America. But the effort would necessitate a severe defensive struggle on the part of those Colonies ; and it is to be feared that it would eventuate in the Yankee Republic 7 becoming possessed of the great central tract of British America, lying between Lake Superior and the Rocky Moun¬ tains, a territory which is invaluable to us, and which seems to be, even now, especially coveted by that Republic. But, with the projected Colonial Union and the defensive power which that Union would provide, we shall make it necessary for our republican neighbors to refrain from attempting any concjuest in the direction of our frontiers. Neither can it be supposed that the hostile feeling of the Northern States towards everything British, and especially towards British America, has become in any way mollified during the past few years. It is scarcely necessary to tell any British American that the very reverse is the case. The aggressive disposition, on the part of our nearest neigh¬ bors, towards these Colonies, is stronger now than it ever was. Should the Colonies become forthwith,politically con¬ solidated, and be therefore placed in a position to assume not only a strong defensive but an offensive attitude, there is little, or no probability that such aggressive disposition will be practically manifested. Should these Colonies remain wholly disunited as at present, or not firmly consolidated as a political unit, very disastrous results may be anticipated, viewing the matter even from this point alone, results which may prove irremediable but, with such a consolidation, we may smile at any hostile demonstration that can be made upon our most assailable frontier. Whilst a Convention of the leading statesmen of the Colo¬ nies is actually engaged in discussing and elaborating the details of a scheme for Union, the adoption of which the members of that Convention expect to procure, it would be useless here to advocate special views upon any of those details. Even if the author could assume that he is capable of instructing the members of that Convention, their plan must have been elaborated before these lines can reach the eyes of the public. Again, it seems scarcely necessary to 8 discuss here, with a view to influencing the minds of the members of any of those bodies to whom it may be submitted for approval, any detail of a scheme which will doubtless be accepted, or rejected, as a whole by such bodies. But there is one point upon which the author conjectures that the Con¬ vention may feel a delicacy in propounding any views, espe¬ cially for the approval of the Imperial Government—that is, as to the Constitution of the head of the proposed consolidated Colony of British North America. So late as 1854,—when the first of the following papers was written,—and even later, republican propensities seemed to be so rampant in North America that one could scarcely venture to hope for a popular hearing to any proposal for extending or perpetuating the monarchical principle. Even British Americans—truly loyal British Americans, believing themselves firmly attached to royalism-had, unconsciously perhaps, become imbued, to a certain extent, with republi¬ canism. Fortunately, a great change has come over us. Hie anticipations of those who had ventured to predict the utter, signal failure of republican institutions on this continent, have already been fully verified. The last, much- vaunted model republic, the United States, has proved an ignominious failure beyond all question to any person outside its borders. Glance over the whole of South America, where. JSature^ seems to have provided everything for the develop¬ ment of great and prosperous nations ; and the only political organization which the philanthropic cosmopolite can regard with anything approaching to satisfaction is that of°the Empire of Brazil, a monarchy. Coming into North America, we find that Mexico, with all the natural elements of great- ness, has, during half a century of republican rule,_or rather, misrule,—been all that time in a state of anarchy. Just now, that long distracted nation is adopting the monar¬ chical form of Government, and with prospects of tranquillity and prosperity combined which it never enjoyed before. 9 The once United States are in a state of political chaos ; and we hear rumors—vague, it is true—that the so-called Southern Confederacy, when it can get the opportunity of determining upon its political Constitution for the future, seriously thinks of adopting the monarchical principle. In the face of facts which are daily obtruding themselves upon our notice, it is difficult to conceive that any well- informed British American politician can be opposed to mo¬ narchical institutions, or can be indifferent to the necessity of maintaining them in our own country. But many of them may not have sufficiently considered how they can best be maintained and perpetuated. On a careful study of the Constitutions of the various British Colonies, it would really appear that, in framing them, human ingenuity has been taxed to its utmost to devise and incorporate In them two principles most conducive to the political instability of those several Colonies. Human inge¬ nuity seems to have succeeded. Consequently, two prin¬ ciples which have been essential to the success of the British Constitution as worked out in the Mother Country, have been carefully eliminated from the Constitutions of the Colonies. Our executive head is periodically and frequently changed ; and the old English law of primogeniture and of entail of real estate is not suffered to exist. The tendency of both these principles, which we have not in our Colonial Constitu¬ tions, is to attach men—not certain individuals or classes, but men generally—to the soil, to the Crown, to their coun¬ try. They tend immensely to maintain the political stability of a nation ; whilst they in no way impede its material or intellectual progress. An open advocacy of the law of entail of real estate in these Colonies will probably be as startling now as that of a political consolidation of them was ten years ago. British Americans may perhaps become more fami¬ liarized with the idea and more favorably disposed towards it in coming years. It is not the author’s purpose, here and » 10 Pimple of law; but t, speak of that t » m0r0 ‘“ 1,0rto ‘ ““"till to political stability,— „ ■ 1 necessity for a not periodically changing, but '“entire head,-for vitally, L?Z * 1 r U *'7 monarch. It will be at once sug- r n alb J e tave ° heredita O ™>narch. True ; but that out : * r T fr<,l ° “ ; “ may be said, with- amono P rT’a h “‘l "‘ W, ' g “ “ the “ntiinent of loyalty a“lmo ht 7“*“’ "' U ' Mi " SS '»»”* “nr Queen ™f ° S ° US ““ ““ e "“eh we entertain towards Bve 1 e, ^ t ' V<> a I*— «<*«- ve iiead neare r home—nay, at home. renuWie S tU o ent0f ; hiSt0rJ , Cann0t but have Served that all , 7 m ? den ’’ e, " bra0i “ S “y considerable tied „1„ ■T' '" 1 ’ have b “ n slmrt-lived. Their poli- »d a b ac, W “ B " S “ dis ‘metive, brilliant, an. att,active centre in which the popular affection, conccn- Md CT r'l W P ° WarIj- “ is "* “ d aepiting in the sutc neeessanly grantates. It i. the reproductive core the 7 centre of tbe etellary system, the apex of % irr; vrr ° f the areh; u »*« -s. 7 - 1 U1 113 desideratum can only be had in a here¬ ditary executive head. Nominally, we now live under a monarchy; but in reality Ztff u“i 7“‘ Utions m essentially republican, even » that of the head of our Colonial Government. Our Governors :Sll P etc edT fiVG r * yearS - ^ P°P uIar a ‘ once. It can really make but little difference whether, for the brief period they hold am" 6 ’ 77° Ch ° Sen hy P ° pular suffra S e «* the Colony or appointed by some other power outside of it. They are teture ° f ° ttr SOverei S n 8 from the very tenuie of their evanescent office, they cannot be regarded as Her representatives. ° 11 An essential to the consolidation of these Colonies and their ultimate success as a nation, will be a hereditary vice¬ roy . It is scarcely necessary here to say that nothing could be more grateful to the feelings of British North Americans than to see that hereditary viceroyalty vested in some mem¬ ber of the family of our present Queen. A viceroy heredi¬ tary in some branch of the Royal Family, to which the affec tions of British America so fondly cling, would be an earnest of the political stability of the United Colonies. It would also afford an additional tie, if any such can be wanting, between British America and the Mother Country. If it should prove, when the proceedings of that body become known, that the Quebec Convention have not deter¬ mined upon a hereditary viceroyalty as an element in our prospective Constitution, it is certainly most desirable that those who may have the power to do so, should supply that element. It is one which is absolutely essential to our poli¬ tical success. The author cannot but think that the discussion here of any other detail of the projected Union Constitution would be uncalled for whilst we are still unaware of the decisions at which the Quebec Conference have arrived upon those details. Should it ever be made to appear that the following brochures , either in their previous or present editions, have aided in ever so slight a degree in bringing about a Union of the Colonies of British North America under a stable, monarchical Constitution, the writer must say that he will feel proud in having assisted to lay the very corner-stone of what he knows will be his country’s true greatness. Halifax, Nova Scotia, October, 1864. OBSERVATIONS UPON A UNION OF THE COLONIES of BRITISH NORTH AMERICA. 1854-55. A detailed scheme for a Union of the North American Colonies was drawn up by the late Hon. Richard John Uniacke, and submitted to the Imperial Cabinet, about the commencement of the present century. A similar scheme was proposed by the late Chief Justice Sewell of Quebec, in 1814 ; and was warmly advocated by His Royal Highness the late Duke of Kent. Since then it has been strongly urged upon the Imperial Government by that distinguished statesman, the late Earl of Durham; it has been highly recommended by nearly every author of respectable repu¬ tation who has published his views upon British America; it has been extensively discussed by the provincial press, and by the people, at their own fire-sides ; it has been spoken of, in the highest terms, on the floors of the Canadian Par¬ liament ; and, in the House of Assembly of Nova Scotia, a movement—in which the “ leaders” of the Government, and the Opposition, of the day, cordially joined—has been made to carry it into effect. This being the case, the u liter, in advocating the necessity for such a union, can do little more than repeat what has been already said, and give a brief summary of the reasons why this idea ot union has taken so firm a hold upon the British American mind. 14 The principal of these reasons is to be found in the relation which the North American Colonies hear to all the rest of the world. Among the natives of those Provinces, there is that craving after nationality which is inseparable from the minds of a free people in whom the want is unsatisfied. The pe¬ culiar situation of the British Americans makes them feel this want in an unusual degree. Situated between Great Britain, on the one hand, and the United States of America, on the other, they are incessantly tantalized by the might and glory of these, the two greatest nations on earth. They know and they feel that British America too, is capable of taking and maintaining, in the estimation of the world, an honorable national rank, beside these elder powers; but is prevented from doing so by her anomalous position. All the institutions of both Great Britain and the United States are on a grand and magnificent scale. None of those belonging to the Provinces are so; because, from their disconnected position, they cannot unitedly carry out any great work, and no one of them is capable of doing so alone. The dissatis¬ faction which this engenders, is heightened by the comparisons provoked by the vicinity of their insignificant institutions to those of their more distinguished neighbors. The British American, on looking across the Southern frontier of his native land, sees a people, distinct but speaking the same language and having many of their leading insth tutions founded upon the same model as those of his own country, who have a world-wide reputation, and to whom the held for individual exertion is unbounded, and for whom the rewards of success are of the very first class. He there sees men of the humblest grade rising to a position which places them on a political level with the greatest potentates on earth ; others attaining a world-wide fame as statesmen, as jurists, as diplomatists, and as military and naval officers. He sees the republic of the United States assuming, to itself exclusively, the title of “American,” whilst its territory is 15 inferior in extent, in resources, and in advantageous geogra¬ phical position, to that portion of the continent to which he himself belongs. He knows that the flag of the United States is known and honored, in every corner of the earth, as that of a nation which is considered a wonderful pheno- menon’for its great achievements in wealth and commercial prosperity; whilst British America, winch, under all dis¬ heartening circumstances, has worked up to a position which makes her, in reality, “ the third commercial power on earth,” has no distinguishing rank, place, or even name, beyond her own borders. He knows the American Republic to be a familiar idea—its history, institutions, wealth, pow'er, and future prospects intimately known—among . communities who have never heard of the American Provinces; or who, if they have, think of them but as some barbarous deserts “ on the outskirts of creation.” On looking farther away, to the other independent nations of America and to the inferior States of Europe, he sees them, although inferior to British America in every point of view, except the mere accident of distinct nationality, seated in the commonwealth of nations, and their alliance courted by the greatest empires. Turning to his native country, the contrast which he sees it present to each of these, and particularly to its republican neighbor, is not at all calculated to gratify his ambitious feelings, whether they are of a national or merely personal character. British America cannot receive that degree of foreign consideration to which, taken as an aggregate, it is, in strictness, entitled; because it cannot, in fact, be con¬ sidered as an aggregation, but as a number of disconnected and mutually independent individuals, each of which, re¬ garded separately, loses immeasurably by that contrast already mentioned. To be a British American, means nothing -in the world’s estimation: to be a Canadian, a New Brunswicker, or a Nova Scotian, is to be just the next thing to nothing. r 16 On coming down to his own individual case, the British American finds the prospect not more cheering. The Pro¬ vinces have but few prizes to offer, as rewards to honorable exertion in the higher walks of life. Those honors , which, under established national organizations, furnish so powerful a stimulus to industry and talent, are here “ few and far between; ’ and the few which are attainable, are so insigni¬ ficant, as to be insufficient, in themselves, to satisfy the natural cravings of human nature for distinction. The very channels by which such honors are usually attained, are virtually closed against the American Colonist. True, he belongs to that great empire in which, as a general rule, talented exertion meets with more signal rewards than in any other ; but he is far removed from the arenas on which those rewards are achieved \ and practically, although not in theory, is excluded from the fountain head whence they proceed. Few feel the desire to enter any of those pro¬ fessions by which alone they can hope to attain a distin¬ guished rank as Britons , in contradistinction to mere local rank ; because, by doing so, they must necessarily turn their backs for ever upon what they consider as more particularly their own country. Apart from this consideration, they know too well that they have the smallest chance of success. The British American Colonist believes—with how much reason, let others judge—that it would be next to madness for him to enter the British army, or navy, without that interest at head-quarters—not possessed by one of his countrymen out of ten thousand—which is necessary to procure promotion even when it is honorably earned. A similar lack of patronage aids in deterring him from entering either of the English “ learned professions.” The Corps Diplomatique, it is sufficiently obvious to every one, is com¬ pletely closed against him. The Imperial Parliament, the diplomatic body, the army, and the navy being virtually closed against him, the Colonial Bar and the Colonial Legis- 17 lature, farnisli the only narrow avenues by which he can attain what may be called professional distinction. Whether or not he possesses the particular talents required for success in either of these, he knows that the distinction which that success will confer is extremely insignificant. A seat in a Provincial Cabinet, or on the Bench of one of the many Courts which share the legal and equitable jurisdiction of the Provinces, affords, in itself, but a small temptation to the man of powerful intellect and lofty aspirations. The British American sees men, in the Mother Country, springing up to the rank of Field-Marshals, Admirals, founders of noble houses, Viceroys presiding over countries which are them¬ selves mighty empires—nay, to the position of virtual rulers of the great empire which comprises many of such vice¬ royalties. He may be by nature qualified to enter the lists in competition with these world-renowned fellow-subjects of his. He is precluded by his position from making the attempt. A few miles from his own home he may see one with whom probably he is personally acquainted, and has always con¬ sidered as, in every respect, his inferior, raised to the high position of President of the United States. He may not aspire even to the position of Governor of his native Pro¬ vince. It may be said that it is very unphilosophical in the British Americans to entertain these ambitious feelings. That may be so, but the feelings are entertained neverthe¬ less. They are not a more philosophical people than any other enlightened class of the human family; and it is but natural to suppose that they must experience emotions which affect powerfully all such classes, but more particularly the Anglo-Saxon race. Whatever may be said in condemnation of personal ambition, it will scarcely be denied, that, where that feeling is systematically held in check, or confined within narrow limits, there can be no very long and peaceful con¬ tinuance of what is called national progress . There will be B 18 either political convulsions, or general sluggishness. Personal ambition, as already shown, is now being thwarted, in British America, after both these modes. Two results of this, already too clearly discernible, are a strong feeling of discontent among the more intellectual and better educated classes, and the splitting up of the whole community into small, but violent, political factions. A Union of the North American Colonies would remove the causes of this discontent and smother this faction spirit among the colonists. Such a Union would throw open an arena vast enough for the desires of the most ambitious— one in which all professions would soon find ample scope for action and rewards commensurate with their exertion. The old, narrow, partizan spirit would speedily die out in the new combinations thus formed ; and politicians, of whatever name or party, would move with a higher and nobler aim. It would also satisfy the cravings of that feeling more widely extended, and perhaps deeper, than any which has self alone for its object. It would satisfy the cravings of national ambition. Men are not quite satisfied with their country, whatever it may be, unless it possesses, in their estimation, some considerable degree of grandeur or glory, either past, present, or future. The accident of birth is rarely, if ever, sufficient in itself to attach a man to his native country—at least, it is insufficient to render him quite satisfied with it. He wants something more to cling to. In contemplating the existence of his country, as in contemplating that of himself individually, he is not satisfied to confine his desires to the isolated present, however favorably circumstanced that pre¬ sent may be. lie would fain indulge in fond reminiscences of the past, or exult in glorious anticipations of the future. To the British American, as such, the past is a blank. A consummation of the Provincial Union, would be to him an assurance that the future would not present the same dreary void. It would give his country a name and a standing 19 which would be known and recognized in every comer of the earth ; and would make it such a country as he could cling to with affection, and regard with pride. Though its history and local associations would be for him unconnected with the traditions of a long line of ancestry, he could hope that they would be brightened by the deeds of a happy and glorious posterity. Few reflecting persons, in British America, of whatever rank, have not perceived, with painful feelings, the insignificant position which, in a national point of view, their country has hitherto occupied. A compact political Union would be, at once, the most effective and the most feasible means of removing this wide-spread discontent. The argument for Union comprised in the foregoing obser¬ vations, is one which has been felt and appreciated only by the more intelligent classes of the Colonists. There is another argument, which, whether recognised or not, is certainly felt by all. This is the argument deducible from the relation which the Provinces bear to each other —from the effect which their isolated and mutuallyindependent condition has upon their internal prosperity. From the time when the Provinces became separately organised as dependencies of the British Crown, until the present day, they have been as foreign countries to each other. They have, it is true, been in many respects, alike, although separated. They have been subject to the same Crown, and have had all their prin¬ cipal institutions modelled upon the same originals ; yet, from whatever cause, it is useless now T to enquire, they have until within a few years past, kept entirely aloof from each other. Each acting for itself, has quite ignored the existence of the others ; and, by this means, needless differences have arisen between their various juridical codes, their public institutions, and their commercial regulations. Not only have such differences arisen, but they have led the Colonists to thwart and seriously injure each other, in their mutual intercourse. Increasing wealth and intelligence, with their consequent demand for a larger field of action, having neces¬ sarily brought them into closer contact, have led to the removal of some of the principal impediments in the way of that intercourse ; yet those very increased facilities only make more vexatious the remaining obstacles to a perfect Union. It is but a few years since the Colonies adopted the system of free commercial interchange of commodities with each other, instead of the system of protective duties which they had previously upheld to their great mutual injury. They are still separated commercially by the troublesome barriers which necessarily exist between independent coun¬ tries, however amicably united by treaty alone. The needless existence of so many entirely separate and co-ordinate legal jurisdictions, in a single and compact section of the empire, as British America naturally is, tends, in a great degree, to impede commercial intercourse between its various parts. Moreover, the existence of several sets of commercial regu¬ lations, alike in all leading points but just sufficiently dissimilar to clash with each other and to perplex those interested under them, tends, in a still greater degree, to the same result. Their political isolation hinders the Provinces from carry¬ ing out any great work in which they are interested in com¬ mon, and which requires their joint efforts. A melancholy instance of this may be seen in their futile attempts, extend¬ ing over a period of some twelve years, towards the construc¬ tion of an inter-provincial railway. The Provinces were all very desirous of having that great work carried on ; and, since it was proposed, have, each of them within its owm boundaries, undertaken and commenced similar works of vast magnitude, in proportion to their means. No one doubts that, if the Provinces had been united under a single Colo¬ nial Government at the time this great national work w*as first proposed, the road w ould now be nearly if not quite completed from Halifax to the foot of Lake Huron. 21 There are numerous other public works, besides railroads, in which the Provinces are equally interested, requiring the co-operation of all, but which, under the present system, either cannot be carried on at all, or their progress must be attended with checks and delays which are extremely annoy¬ ing and detrimental to the general interests of the country. So remote are these Provinces, socially and politically, from each other, that it is extremely difficult even for private capitalists, residing in two or more of them, to unite in any undertaking requiring their joint efforts ; and, if the opera¬ tions of the undertaking are intended to extend into more than one Province, it seems to be practically next thing to impossible. To say that their present state of disunion discourages the production of native literature and mechanical invention, in the Provinces, may seem, at the present time, a small argument in favor of Union. They being new countries, but few attempts have been made in either of these branches of intel¬ lectual development. Yet, however slight the results of this discouragement thus far, they must increase with the lapse of time ; and, if suffered to continue, would, without doubt, soon become a very serious evil. Giving an individual the power of securing his patent, or his copy-right, over the whole of the Provinces, by going through a troublesome and expen¬ sive ordeal in each one separately, can but slightly modify the general tendency of complete intercolonial independence in this matter. There are innumerable points of detail in which this want of Union seriously retards the general prosperity of the Pro¬ vinces. Few persons, residing in British America, have not, in their own persons, seriously felt its injurious results. The cure for all this is obvious. Let a Legislative Union of the Provinces take place, and all the evils alluded to, under this division of the subject, terminate immediately. /This is too nearly self-evident to require anything in the shape of proof; and the mode by which that Union would effect such a result, is too plain to require any demonstration. There is yet a third point of view in which the Provinces must be regarded, furnishing an argument in favor of Union ; that is, the relation which those Provinces , as component parts of the British Empire , hear to foreign countries , and particularly to the United States of America. Regarded in this respect, their present aspect must suggest feelings of not the most pleasurable nature to a large majority of the British Americans, and certainly should give some concern to the Mother Country. The United States have, since attaining their independence, increased in area, wealth and physical strength to an extent which has aroused the wonder, and which, but for some attendant circumstances, might excite the admiration of the civilized world. That republic has not been at all particular as to the means by which her present status has been attained. She is the imbodiment of ultra- Democracy, among the civilized states of the New World, as Russia is the imbodiment of ultra-Monarchical Absolutism, among those of the Old ; and the rapid progress of the two nations, from comparative insignificance to a prominent rank among first-class powers, has been not dissimilar, either in general nature, or in the means by which effected. That rapid rise to power has doubtless been caused, in a great measure, by activity in internal improvement; but it has been mainly owing to a system of aggression by which they have increased their own strength at the expense of neighbors who were too heedless to be disturbed by those aggressions, or too weak to oppose them. Great Britain, with the other nations of Western Europe, has awakened to a sense of the misdeeds of Russia—she still sleeps over those of the United States, although none the less menacing to her own security. The British American subjects of Her Majesty are too near the scene of action to be unconscious, or uninterested specta¬ tors of .the aggressive policy of the United States. 23 In 1803, the Government of that country, by taking advan¬ tage of Napoleon’s necessities, extorted from the French, under the name of a purchase, the Province of Louisiana, thereby more than doubling the extent of its territory. By driving another extremely clever bargain with Spain, in 1819, Florida was obtained. In 1842 the “ Ashburton Treaty,” which settled what was called the “ North-Eastern Boundary Dispute,” between Great Britain and the United States, gave to the latter, without their having any valid claim to it, a further acquisition of territory, inconsiderable indeed as to extent, but, from its position, of incalculable advantage to British America. This treaty, as has been since clearly proved, was effected by means of gross misrepresentation, on the part of the United States Government and its officials. By a somewhat similar course of procedure, attended by what British Americans will ever consider an indefensible disregard of her own rights and interests, on the part of Great Britain, the grasping republic, in 1846, obtained a portion of Oregon, thereby reaching the Pacific Ocean and acquiring a further immense increase of valuable territory. On their southern frontiers, the United States have pursued a system of annexa¬ tion, somewhat different, but no less successful. lor some years previous to 1836, a number of “ American” citizens —cautious pioneers of a class of men who have since become more daring in their movements, and have acquired a wide notoriety, under the name of filibustieros —pushed their way southwards into the sparsely populated Mexican territory of Texas. Upon finding themselves sufficiently strong to risk the attempt, they raised the standard of revolt against the Mexican Government. Assisted by large bodies of volun¬ teers who flocked to the scene of action, from all parts of the United States, the rebels did not have to contend very long against Mexico, impoverished and demoralized as she was by a quarter of a century of civil war. Texas became an inde¬ pendent country, and, in 1845, that territory was annexed , T 24 and formed another of the United States. By this series of adroit manoeuvres, Mexico lost one-fifth of her territory; and the United States gained an addition nearly equal to one- fifth of what they previously held. Throughout those regions of imperfectly explored wilder¬ ness, where national boundary lines are not so intimately known, or so accurately defined, as in Europe, there cannot be much difficulty, when the desire is not wanting, in raising a dispute relative to land-marks. So it was soon discovered, both in the United States and in Mexico. A dispute, turn¬ ing mainly upon the question of the south-western boundary of Texas, brought the two countries into actual hostilities; and the year 1846 saw an “American” invading army cross the Rio Grande. If the Mexican contest with the Texan rebels was short and decisive, this one was still more so ; for now Mexico, weaker and more distracted internally than ever, had the whole of the United States as her avowed enemy. Part of the price at which she purchased peace, was the dis¬ posal of just one-third of her whole remaining territories which went to increase the wealth and power of her insatiable neighbor and enemy, and which forms rather more than one- sixth of the whole territory now possessed by the United States. By the peace of 1848, the latter country acquired the fertile, gold-bearing California, with a wider and more valuable frontage on the Pacific, and the large territory of New Mexico, opening into the heart of Mexico an unobstructed road for further and future conquests. Whoever has observed the course of events, in that quarter, since the peace of 1848, cannot suppose it will be very long before such further con¬ quests will be attempted. We have but recently seen an attempt made to perpetrate upon Cuba another revolution on the Texan principle. This rapid growth of the great North American republic is fraught with painful considerations, to the British American people—the more so from their observation of the means by 25 which that growth has, in a great measure, been effected. But apart from all consideration of the means by which the United States have acquired the vast territories and conse¬ quent political strength they now possess, one would naturally suppose that the mere fact of such acquisition would be suf¬ ficient to give serious concern to the British nation. In 1783, those States were contained within an area of less than 390,000 square miles,—the whole States and “ Territories” together occupying but 720,000 square miles,—and contained a population of not more than two and a half millions. In 1854 they have a territory of 2,750,000 square miles, and a popula¬ tion of over twenty-four millions. The growth of the Russian Empire, in territory, population, wealth—in power generally, during a period of 150 years, has not equalled that of the “ American” Republic, for a space of less than half that time. Great Britain has begun to feel serious alarm lest the Russian Autocrat should, by crossing nearly 2000 miles over the savage deserts of Central Asia, attempt a conquest of the Anglo-Indian Empire. It is somewhat singular that she should entertain no apprehensions lest the democratic power of the United States should cross the St. Lawrence and the St. Croix, and attempt the conquest of her no less important North American Colonies. Russia has never yet attempted, or even made any decided demonstration in the way of attempting, the apprehended conquest of India. The forces of the United States have twice invaded the North American Provinces ; and—let men say what they will about the ties of kindred, and “ America’s” affection for her Mother Coun¬ try—the desire to do so again remains quite as strong as it ever was. There is only the most extreme possibility that the United States will ever bring British North America under their dominion ; but it is quite within the bounds of probability that the attempt will be made—and that at no very remote period, unless means are taken to prevent it. The cheapest and most effective of those means would be to 26 place the Provinces in a position to defend themselves—to give them that self-reliance, that compactness of physical strength, that unity of action, and increased dissemination and intensity of national feeling, which can be given by a Legislative Union of those Provinces, and by that only. A few statistics will go far towards enabling us to judge of the capacity, present and future, of the Provinces, if so united, to form a bulwark against foreign encroachment. They will also enable us to form an idea of the real value and importance of those Provinces, and consequently of the results which would be likely to follow their violent separation from the Mother Country. The growth of British America will be better comprehended by comparing it with that of her more celebrated neighbor, the United States, whose rapid progress has so much astonished the world. An opinion has very generally prevailed on this continent, and also in Great Britain in so far as any opinion is there entertained on the subject, to the effect that, while the United States have advanced amazingly in population, wealth, commercial enter¬ prise, and general prosperity, British America has remained almost stationary. This opinion has done serious injury both to the reputation of the latter country, as a field for emigra¬ tion, and to that of its inhabitants as an active and intelligent people. Facts prove, that, of the two countries, the progress of British America has been the most rapid. Let us begin with the comparative increase in the popula¬ tion of the two countries; and take, as a starting point, the year 1783, from which period dates the separate, national existence of the United States. In 1780 the population of those States amounted to 2,051,000. In 1790 it was 3,929,872. In 1783, it may be fairly estimated at. 2,500,000 In 1850, it amounted to 23,191,074; and, in 1851, say.. 24,000,000 Increase in 68 years, from 1783 to 1851 Equal to 860 per cent. r 21,500,000 27 The population of the whole of Canada, in 1784, and say in 1783, amounted to. 113,000 That of the Lower Provinces, including the Loyalists who settled there at the close of the Revolutionary War,.. 32,000 In all 145,000 The population of Canada West, in 1850, was by census returns 781,000—in 1852,952,004— and, in 1851, say. 871,500 Canada East, in 1848,-770,000 ; in 1852,— 890,261 ; in 1851 say. 840,500 New Brunswick, by census of 1851,. 194,000 Nova Scotia, by do. 277,000 Prince Edward Island, in 1848, 62,678 : at same rate of increase as for three years previous to that time, in 1851, it would be. 70,000 - 2,253,000 Increase in 68 years, from 1783 to 1851. 2,108,000 Equal to 1450 per cent. At the same rate of increase, the population of the United States would have been thirty-six and a quarter millions. In the ten years previous to 1850, during which time the tide of emigration set more strongly towards the United States than at any former period, the population of those States increased at the rate of 36*86 per cent.: that of the Provinces, during the ten years previous to 1851, at the rate of 48*41 per cent. To rectify the erroneous supposition which, probably, will immedi¬ ately impress itself upon many minds, that this rapid growth, on the part of British America, has taken place in the Upper Canada section alone, it may be observed, that, during those respec¬ tive decades, the population of New Brunswick—the lowest, in this respect, on the Provincial list—increased at a more rapid rate than that of any of the Eastern States except Mas¬ sachusetts and Rhode Island ; and that Nova Scotia nearly equalled the State of New York. In these computations, no allowance has been made for that addition to the population of the United States which has been caused by the acquisition 28 of territory. That share which emigration has added to the population of British America, must be due, it is but natural to suppose, solely to the genuine merits of the country as a field for emigration. Its name has no such prestige as has attached to that of the United States, from the moment of their attaining their independence. Its great commercial, agricultural, and other advantages, have not been constantly trumpeted to the world like those of the adjoining Republic and some other Colonial sections of the British Empire. It may be contended that a rapid increase in the population of a country is no certain indication of its prosperity; but certainly it forms a strong presumption of such prosperity. But further statistics may be shown, affording more conclusive proofs. Supposing the case of the United States to be made, w*e may continue the comparison. The tonnage of vessels owned by the Provinces (New¬ foundland included) in 1806, amounted to. 71,943 In 1850,. 446,935 Increase, 374,992 tons Equal to 521 per cent. % The tonnage of the United States, in 1806, amounted to. 1,208,735 In 1850,. 3,535,454 Increase, 2,326,719 tons Equal to 191 per cent. No one will pretend to doubt that the tonnage of the Pro¬ vinces has continued to increase in the same—if not in a much greater—ratio, down to the present time, although sta¬ tistics of its present amount are not easily procurable. The value of imports into the United States, in 1851, reduced to sterling, amounts to.£43,244,986 Equal to £1-80 per head on the whole population. The value of exports , for the same year, amounted to.... £43,677,602 Equal to £1*81 per head. The imports of Canada, in 1851, amounted to.... £4,650,088 stg. 29 Deduct value of imports from other B. N. A. Colonies,. 99,480 stg. — 4,550,608 New Brunswick,. 970,488 “ Less imports from B. N. A. Colonies,• 134,937 « — 835,551 1,105,528 « Less imports from B. N. A. Colonies,. • • ^204,483 “ 901,045 Prince Edward Island,. Less estimated imports from B. N. A. 107,751 “ 74,822 “ 32,929 Total, (in Sterling) Equal to £2*80 per head on population. In 1851, the value of exports from Ca- £6,320,133 nada amounted to. £2,652,475 stg. Less exports to B. N. A. Colonies,. 193,433 “ 2,459,042 New Brunswick,. 756,021 “ Less exports to B. N. A. Colonies,. 59,572 “ 696,449 Nova Scotia,. 708,462 “ Less exports to B. N. A. Colonies,. 269,319 “ — 439,143 Prince Edward Island,. 72,093 “ Less exports to B. N. A. Colonies. 34,461 “ 37,632 Total (in Sterling) £3,632,266 Equal to £1*61 per head on population. The value of ships built and sent out of the Provinces for sale, is not included in the above exports. If the value— which can be estimated only—of this important article of British American export, were added to the above sum, along with an allowance which should be made for under valuation of articles, there can be no doubt whatever that the sum of the value of exports would exceed—and very considerably exceed—that of the United States, in proportion to the popu- lation. 30 If we carry our researches down to a more recent period, the result appears still more favorable for the Provinces. The imports of the United States, according to published returns, amounted, in 1853, to <£53,595,735 stg., shewing an increase of 23 per cent, since 1851. The exports , for the same year, amounted to <£46,195,031 stg., making an increase of 5 per cent, since 1851. In 1853, the imports of Canada, less imports from other North American Colonies, were. £6,269,766 stg. Of New Brunswick, less as above. “ Nova Scotia, « . 1,411,523 1,106,925 113,544 “ Prince Edward Island, u . • Increase, since 1851, equal to 41 per cent. In the same year, the exports of Canada, less as £8,901,758 stg. above, were. £4 I2fi StS Of New Brunswick, were. 955 493 “ Nova Scotia, “ . 667,526 55.912 “ Prince Ed. Island, 11 . _ . £5,805,284 stg. Increase, since 1851, 59 per cent. Newfoundland, as will be observed, is not taken into any of the above calculations j although the imports and exports to and from that Colony, are included in the deductions made from those of the other Provinces. Neither is the trade of Rupert’s Land, through Hudson Bay, or that of the Pacific Coast and the already populous Colony of Vancouver Island, taken into account. Although statistics from some of these cannot be easily procured, enough is, however, known con¬ cerning the extent of their trade, to lead to the belief, that if accurate statements of the exports and imports of the whole of British America could be furnished, they would prove the trade of the country, in the aggregate, to be in a more pros¬ perous condition even than is shown by the above figures as to part. To some persons, it may seem as absurd thus to connect 31 the Atlantic Provinces with British Oregon, Vancouver, or Queen Charlotte’s Islands, as to connect them, in like manner, with New Zealand. But it must be borne in mind, that we are considering the question of a Union of the British North American Colonies ; and the great object of that Union would not be attained, unless every part of British North America—particularly of the continental portions—partici¬ pated in it. The practicability of such a Union, with refer¬ ence to geographical difficulties, is fast ceasing to be considered a mere visionary idea. A petition signed by several of the leading men of Canada and the Northern States, has been laid before the Canadian Parliament, during its present session (December, 1854,) with the object of obtaining the countenance of that body to a scheme for con¬ structing a railroad from Canada, through British territory, to the shore of the Pacific Ocean. When this great work is once seriously commenced—and commenced it assuredly soon will be, and completed too; for the route proposed is declared to be the only practicable one, for the purpose, across the continent—the only obstacle in the way of an immediate and complete political union of the whole of British North America, will have been removed. The Empire for which the foundation is here furnished, would be inferior in extent only to the Russian, the Chinese, and the Brazilian empires ; and in commanding position, its advantages would be equal to those of all the three combined. Any attempt to define the future capabilities of British America, if com¬ pactly united under a single, local government, would require a lengthened investigation of the resources of the country, and would involve much speculation. Taking the least favorable accounts of the resources of the imperfectly explored territories which it contains, the country would be quite capable, at a moderate calculation, and without making any allowance for the constantly increasing facilities with which intellectual culture furnishes man to provide for his 82 own sustenance, of supporting a population of 100 millions. Taking this in connection with the fact of its unrivalled geographical position, as a commercial and maritime power, we may form some idea of what British America may become. In departing from the question of the necessity for a Union of the Provinces to take up that of their Constitution under such a Union, the writer feels that he is beginning to step upon ground hitherto but imperfectly explored. Nearly every one seems to be impressed with a sense of the neces¬ sity for something being done to bring the Provinces into closer connection with each other. A vast deal has been said on the subject, in this its general aspect; but very little upon the practical details. When it has been spoken of, it has been most frequently as a Federal Union ; but without any reason being given for the application of that epithet, or any argument to prove that that particular kind ot ! nion is the most desirable. It is sufficiently obvious that any closer Union, if to exist at all, must be either a Federal Union, according to the usual acceptation of that term upon this continent, or an absolute, legislative one. The presumption which seems to exist, in so many minds, that the Union contemplated must be a Federal one, is, no doubt, founded upon our contiguity to the United States. We are accustomed to see, in that great republic—our nearest neighbor, and that with which our intercourse is most frequent—the most remarkable example of a Federal Union which the world has probably ever seen. But it will be diffi¬ cult to find any argument deducible from the history, or condition, of that republic, to favor the ’establishing of a similar Confederation in British America. The foundation of the Federal Constitution of the United States, was framed to suit the prejudices of the thirteen States which originally 33 formed the North American Confederation ; not because, reasoning upon sound political principles, it was the most desirable Constitution for the country. But, although not the result of deliberative design, neither has it grown up gradually out of the circumstances and necessities of the country ; and it remains yet to be proved that it is the one best suited to those circumstances and necessities. A Con¬ federation had been previously attempted in which each State, completely independent in itself, delegated, to the central authority, such of its power as that State pleased. That share was, at the very outset, extremely insignificant; but, as time elapsed, it rapidly lessened and finally became a merely nominal portion. When the Confederation was on the eve of entire dissolution, and whilst the country, involved in internal difficulties and with crippled resources, was yet fearful of attack from foreign powers, it was deemed indispensable to do something towards the consolidation of its strength. Between the requirements of the collec¬ tive body and the prejudices of the individual States, a compromise was, at length, effected ; and in the words of De Tocqueville, “ the strict rules of logic were evaded,” and a Federal Constitution was formed, the principal and most char¬ acteristic articles of which weV-e “ contrary to the spirit of Constitutional Government.” It will be well for the statesmen of British America, before taking any active steps towards a Union of the Provinces, to ascertain if, since 1789, some progress has not been made in the science of Constitutional Government, as well as in all other sciences. Before enquiring into a Federal Union of the North American Provinces, it may be well to look into the question of its practicability. To form a Federal Union upon the “ American ” model, each Provincial Legislature and Execu¬ tive, as at present constituted, must be expected to degrade itself, in some degree, by yielding to the corresponding Federal body, the possession of the supreme, internal power. c 34 If the Union were proposed in this shape, to the several Legislatures, it is more than probable that one very serious obstacle would be started, at the outset. It is but natural that a man engaged voluntarily in any occupation, should feel a great repugnance to raising up another to preside over, and direct him, in carrying on that very occupation, whilst he himself is to take a step lower down. However consonant to reason such a course may be, under certain circumstances, it must be, in almost every case, extremely humiliating to the feelings. The individual supposed will, particularly if in difficulty, scarcely object to associating another with himself for successfully carrying on the occupa¬ tion in question ; but as for giving his place to another and occupying a subordinate position himself, such a step will scarcely be submitted to until he is driven to the last extrem¬ ity. What is true with regard to an individual will also hold good with regard to a collection of individuals, even where, as in the present case, it consists of a grave, deliberative, parliamentary assembly. The Legislature of Nova Scotia, for instance, may perceive nothing derogatory to its dignity, or hurtful to its- feelings, in uniting, bodily and with powers unimpaired, with those of Canada and New Brunswick; but it is scarcely to be supposed that it will, without many internal throes, curtail its own powers and privileges for the purpose of raising up another legislative body similar, but superior, to itself. But, presume that no such obstacles will be created by the Provincial Legislatures; and that the Federal Parliament and Federal Government are unanimously decided upon,— What is to be the prerogative of that Government; and upon what objects is that Parliament to legislate ? Of what powers can the several Provincial Legislatures divest themselves to bestow upon the Federal Legislature ? It is presumed that each Province would expect to retain the entire control and management of its internal affairs. If it is not to do so, 35 upon what principle can it, in one instance, retain the man¬ agement of its own peculiar affairs, and, in others, yield such management to another, in this respect, concurrent authority ? It is clear that, in this matter of the management of the internal affairs of each Province, there could be no division of authority amicably^ and satisfactorily agreed upon, in the first place ; and if agreed upon at all, it could only lead to clashing of rival claims with no prospect of a generally bene¬ ficial result. It will scarcely be contended, in any quarter, that a Union involving an arrangement of this kind is either practicable, or desirable. If then the Federal Government is not to interfere with the proper, internal affairs of the separate Provinces,—what shall be its powers, and upon what objects shall it be exercised ? We are here led to a view of the striking dissimilarity between the political condition and cir¬ cumstances of the British North American Colonies and those of any Confederation of States which has ever existed. The aim and object, in the formation of every such Confede¬ ration, has been with reference to its foreign relations. With scarcely an exception, the authority of the Federal Government, in such unions, has been limited exclusively to the management of what, in political parlance, are called “ foreign affairs and to the exercise of such powers as are indispensable to that management. The Federal authorities, in the United States, have, according to the letter of the Constitution, a more extensive power of supervision over the individual States, and more numerous rights of interference in the internal affairs of the collective body, than have ever been entrusted to any other Federal Government. And what are the powders of the Federal Government in that country ? First, as the main object for which the Union itself was formed, we find the exclusive power to make war, and, for that purpose, to raise and equip armies and fleets ; to make peace, and to conclude treaties of commerce with 36 foreign powers ; and as indispensable requisites for the exer¬ cise of these powers, the further power of levying taxes. These, it is quite obvious, have reference only to the foreign relations of the Confederation. The powers of the Federal Government to interfere in what are exclusively the internal affairs of the Union, are few and inconsiderable. The prin¬ cipal are those of controlling the Post Office, and enactmg patent and copyright laws. Besides these, authority oyer all territories belonging to the Union, but not included in any individual State, is vested exclusively in the Federal Govern- ment. It would be extremely difficult—would it not be impossible' _to extend the prerogatives of a Federal Government, in the Provinces, one inch beyond the limits within which they are confined in that republican Confederation, without bung¬ ing it into immediate and dangerous collision with those of the individual Provinces. But how far must the prerogatives of the Provincial Federal Government fall within those limits! From the position of the Provinces as British Colonies, their central Government could not, without some very material modification of their present relations with the Mother Country, have the power of making war and of concluding treaties of peace and commerce, on its own account. The possession of the right to exercise that power, and to make provision for its exercise, is that which gives standing to the Federal Government of the United States; and brings it what respect it does possess from the individual States. The Provincial Federal Government not having this right, and consequently having no power to raise and equip armies and fleets, and to construct and control works of national defence, the only power left for it to exercise, would be—following, when possible, the model of the United States—those of managing the Post Office; and those of legislating upon questions of naturalization, patent, and copyright. It could not be permitted to levy taxes beyond the mere requirements 37 of its own civil list. An inevitable consequence of this would be, that impost duties and other considerable sources of revenue, in the different Provinces, would still be under their separate control. Then there would necessarily be separate customs establishments, and conflicting, commercial regula¬ tions, as at present. It is obvious that it would never pay to keep up a Federal Government, however moderate the expense of doing so, to perform such comparatively unim¬ portant duties. But, apart from all considerations of expense, such an institution, thus almost objectless and powerless, w ould become at once, an object of contempt; and would be practically no Government at all. But in consenting to a Union of the Provinces, of whatever nature such Union might be, the Imperial Government would probably be ready to yield to them a largely increased share of national privileges, attended with proportionate, national responsibilities. Great Britain obviously desires, even now, to bestow upon these Provinces the charge of providing and sustaining the naval and military forces necessary to their security against internal disorder and foreign aggression. The bestowal of this charge would alone, it cannot be doubted, give to the Federal Government an important rank as a national Government; and would ensure it a great degree of moral weight in every section of the Confederation. It is further probable, and certainly very desirable, that, in the event of a Provincial Union, the immense tract known as the Hudson Bay Company’s Territories, or Rupert’s Land, would very soon come under the immediate control of the Central Government. If that Union were a Federal one, this important acquisition to its exclusive jurisdiction would cer¬ tainly both raise and strengthen its position. But both these conditions—one of them certainly an essential one—to the suc¬ cessful maintenance of a Federal Government, rest upon proba¬ bilities pending in the uncertain future; and upon probabilities over which those most interested in the Union have no control. 38 But let the Imperial Government guarantee both condi¬ tions : then upon what terms is the Federal Constitution to be formed ? Upon what plan is the Federal Government, on the one hand, to be balanced against those of the individual Provinces, on the other? Which is to be the rule; and which the exception ; upon points of authority, which shall be the principal; and which the subordinate ? Such ques¬ tions must be extremely difficult to answer, with the view of organizing a Federal Government in any country ; but in British America, owing to its peculiar, political position, they are especially so. Yet these are matters which must be settled before such a Union can go into operation. To leave them otherwise, would be to throw the whole Confederation into a state of complete anarchy. If unlimited, superior, and general powers are to be given to the Federal Govern¬ ment, whilst those of the separate Provinces shall be limited, subordinate, and specific, it is clear that the present Provin¬ cial Constitutions must be nullified, and others, entirely new and essentially different, substituted for them. Hitherto each Province has legislated under the conviction that it had the right to legislate upon all matters immediately affecting its own rights and interests; and has, at various times, assumed the exclusive right to do so. Under such an arrangement as that now alluded to, such legislation w ould be restricted to certain classes of subjects; and even confined within narrow limits as to them. The possession of the supe¬ rior and unlimited power by the general Government would inevitably lead to the extension of its exercise over the local Governments; and these latter w r ould soon become mere shadows, and the position of each Province would be sub¬ stantially the same as if the Union had been a Legislative, not a Federal, one, in the first place. Let the powers of the Provincial Governments be unlimited as to object, and those of the Federal Government be restricted, and a sweeping change is still necessary in each Provincial Constitution, 39 inasmuch as it must be so materially modified as to allow another Constitution—the Federal one—to operate side-by- side with it, and upon the same community of interests. And here, as in the other case, there is every probability of the equilibrium, between the general and the local Govern¬ ments, being speedily destroyed. The Federal Government, limited as to its objects and with circumscribed authority, must be further necessarily straitened, in this latter respect, from being itself the governing power of a Colony, not of an independent country . It will, therefore, be wanting in moral weight, as 'well as in recognised, constitutional authority, to hold its nominal subordinates in check. If, therefore, a rivalry of interests should spring up between different Pro¬ vinces, the central Government would find itself incapable of holding them long together; and would soon become itself an object of contempt to them all. It is certain that either the general or the local Govern¬ ment must be superior; and one, or the other, or both, must be restricted as to jurisdiction. But it must be remembered that there is yet a third whose claims are to be consid¬ ered. Whether or not the Federal and local Governments may, in any one Province, be so nicely balanced by an arti¬ ficial system of checks and counter checks, that one cannot annihilate the other, it certainly seems but reasonable to sup¬ pose that, when the Imperial Government claims its share in the division of authority, the most skilful manufacturer of Constitutions will despair of framing such a one as will ensure the “ balance of power ” between the three. And if such a thing ever should be attempted, and disputes should arise, as they undoubtedly must, between the three ruling powers, it will puzzle the most clear-headed and conscientious British American to ascertain which of the members of this political trinity is most entitled to his allegiance, or how it is to be divided between them. If the Imperial Government is to occupy a position on the soil of British America, on or near r 1 a level with those exercising Federal and Provincial author¬ ity ; and to exercise a direct interference in its internal affairs, conjointly with them,—then a state of constant discord must ensue from the clashing of conflicting rights and rival interests thus brought together. If it is not to exercise that interference except in cases of dispute between the Federal and Provincial authorities, but is to have “ appellate jurisdic¬ tion ” in all such cases, the effect will be virtually to place the Confederated Provinces completely at the mercy of Imperial statesmen. This interference from without, and by men unacquainted, in a great measure, with the merits of the questions under discussion, is a point upon which British Americans are, at present, particularly sensitive, and they are much more disposed to curtail than to extend it. I here is no reason to suppose that, in the event of a Union, such a disposition would be at all lessened. But when such disputes did arise between the Federal and Provincial authorities, or between different Provinces, who would decide them ? If the adjudicating power, in such cases, is not to come from without, the presumption is that it will be vested in a Supreme Court, as in the United States. The vesting ot such a power in a civil, judicial body, would be another sweeping innova¬ tion upon the British Constitution, which recognises no higher authority than Parliament as entitled to deal with questions strictly constitutional. But, apart from these considerations, such a Court must, in cases of serious difficulty,—the only cases in which the interposition of its authority would be desirable,—prove inefficient; for it cannot possess the power to enforce its own decrees. At all events, the creation of a Court endowed with such authority, would be to establish a fourth , independent ruling power over the people of British America ; and, of course, would make still more complicated the complication of difficulties previously existing, and which must always exist where any plurality of rulers have concur¬ rent authority over a nation. 41 Let us suppose all obstacles to the practicability of a Fede- ral Union to be removed. Is such a Union desirable ? The objections to the Federal form of Government are numerous; but the principal of them are owing to a few general causes, simple and easily apprehended. It may be sufficient to point out these causes ; for whoever will allow his attention to dwell upon them, for a brief space, can scarcely require a guide to indicate, or explain, their numerous results. Some of those objections have been already hinted at. Under a Federal Constitution, there must be a want of cohesiveness between the various confederated bodies; and consequently of stability and strength in the Federal Government itself—conditions wdiich, under certain circumstances which are by no mean$ of rare occurrence in the history of any nation, must soon prove fatal to the existence of the Federal Government. Where twx> Governments exercise concurrent authority, as is done by the Federal and separate State Governments, ques¬ tions must arise, even under ordinary circumstances, which will bring them into direct collision. Were such differences to arise upon general questions—upon points of policy affect¬ ing, in an equal degree, every section of the Confederation, the people of the individual State whose Government was at issue with the central Government, would be quite as likely to give their support to the one ruling power, as to the other; therefore, in such a case—if such ever should occur—the chances of any serious injury resulting from such differences, are comparatively slight. Yet even, in this case, there would be such a chance. But such collisions would be much more likely to take place upon questions of a local nature, in which the people of the disputant State felt themselves directly and, it may be, peculiarly interested. Here, from the nature of the point at issue, the tendency of affairs would be to make the difference between the antagonistic Governments grow wider. The people of the individual State would l^ere rally round the local Government, and support it to the last extre- 42 mity ; for its interests and their own, would be identical. The political organization of the State, furnishing evidence of the strength of its position relative to the disputed point, and also a certain means of making its power felt, would, almost certainly, prevent its yielding without a struggle. People are, almost invariably, more jealous of any curtail¬ ment of their local rights, or privileges, than of those of a more general nature. A national insult will pass unheeded, where a slight—perhaps an imaginary one—to a town coun¬ cil, or similar local body, will raise a perfect storm of indig¬ nation. There are always local patriots enough, in every community, to promote the hostile feelings naturally excited towards any power supposed to be adverse to the interests of that community. Political, internal disputes, are usually more difficult of adjustment and more protracted in continu¬ ance, than those springing from a nation’s foreign relations. In cases where such occur, we find both the opposing parties uncompromising, implacable, and obstinate, in the last degree, as the history of all civil wars abundantly testifies. Thus where a rupture is once made between the local and the general Government, it cannot reasonably be supposed that anything but coercive measures will bring them together again. Probably if the members of the Federal and local legislatures had, in the first instance, belonged to the same legislative body, the question between them would, by an interchange of views and by mutual explanations, have been satisfactorily and amicably arranged, after a few hours’ dis¬ cussion. But where they, separately and at a distance from each other, and each collective body with its particular bias, legislate upon the same subject, there is little probability of its merits being fairly discussed by either body; and, under such circumstances, each is extremely liable to mistake, or distort, the opinions and feelings of the other. When the Confederation embraces a considerable number of States, or when its members are separated by geographical position, 43 local prejudices, or interests, it is quite obvious that the pro¬ babilities of a collision are largely increased. When a dispute of this kind comes to an open rupture, whichever of the two conflicting parties may prove successful, the result cannot but prove highly injurious to the welfare of the Confederation, and ultimately fatal to its existence as a Confederation. The invariably disastrous consequences to society generally, of a serious civil contest of this kind, need only be alluded to. If, in such a struggle, the Federal Government prove vic¬ torious, it will take care, by some means, or other, to weaken the pow T er of the refractory State and abridge its privileges, with a view to lessen the probability of any future collision. The discomfited State, on the other hand, cannot but regard itself in the light of a conquered country ; and, as such, any terms whatever imposed by the Federal authorities, will be felt as an infringement of its constitutional rights. Its posi¬ tion and still existing, political organization, will afford oppor¬ tunities of both evading those terms and openly setting them at defiance. Thus, if the Federal Government persists in the course first adopted, jealousies and heartrburnings must continue to exist on the part of both the contending parties ; and open hostilities must become frequent until the individu¬ ality of the single State is entirely destroyed. But suppose the single State in question proves the better of the two in the contest. This is a state of affairs wdiich the evidence of history proves to be the much more probable result of such a contest; and the reasons why it must be so, it is not difficult to discover. In this case, the General Gov¬ ernment, being foiled by that which is, nominally, its subordi¬ nate, must, in consequence, lose immeasurably both in moral weight and physical strength. The successful issue, on the part of the single State, of one contest with the Federal Gov¬ ernment, will naturally lead to renewed contests, on its own part, and to the encouragement of similar attempts, on the part of others, until the Federal Government must, in the natural course of things, become utterly powerless—an object of contempt both at home and abroad ; and each individual State will become, to all intents and purposes, an indepen¬ dent country. It may be said that sectional revolts may take place in any country not having a Federal Government. True, they may do so ; but the probabilities of their taking place are infinitely less than where the Federal form exists. When the Govern¬ ment is not a Federal one, the popular representatives from every section of the country meeting in the same Parliament, their local prejudices are softened down by this general inter¬ course ; differences are compromised at their inception ; mis¬ understandings are, almost immediately, discovered and rectified ; and the whole country assumes the character, in the estimation of those representatives, of a compact unity in which the interests of each section are considered as sub¬ ordinate to the interests of the whole. If a complete disrup¬ tion of the representatives of any one section of the country did take place, it could not, in, any ordinary case, be produc¬ tive of very serious results; because the complete, political local organization, which, under a Federal Government, ■would make such disaffection dangerous, would here be wanting. Where but a single Parliament exists, serious disaffection and open revolt can take place only where some flagrant act of tyranny is perpetrated upon the mass of the people : under a Federal Government, they may and do result from local prejudices, from grievances merely imaginary, from misconception of ideas, and from a mere spirit of insubordi¬ nation. Another evil of this jealous attitude naturally assumed by the general, and the various local, Governments, towards each other, is its demoralizing effect upon the people generally. Each of these Governments, as a natural consequence of its relative position, will endeavor, by every possible means, to lessen the aggressive power of the others—such a procedure 45 being the most easy and effective mode of hindering that power ever being turned against the particular Government in question. When all are thus striving, with the same object in view, the result must be—unless a state of open warfare occurs, to raise and strengthen one State by annihilating others—that they will weaken each other ; and this weaken¬ ing influence must continue incessantly until arrested by some revolution completely changing the relative position of the States participating in it. It need scarcely be said, that a Government cannot be thus weakened with reference to the exercise of its power in one particular direction only. Its strength must be diminished in every respect. It becomes incapable of discharging its legitimate functions within its own territory, and when its authority is unquestioned from without. Not only does its Executive find itself deficient in the actual, physical means of enforcing the laws ; but it soon proves to be comparatively destitute of moral influence among the people over whom it nominally presides ; for when a Gov¬ ernment is thus so notoriously hedged in and fettered as to be incapable of acting with requisite freedom, people soon lose all respect for it. and particularly for that branch which interferes most directly with their personal inclinations. The Executive is, therefore, incapable of discharging the duties which the Constitution imposes upon it; and if the State does not gradually lapse into a condition of complete, political anarchy and social barbarism, it is because the sound, moral sense and high intellectual development of a large majority of the people, produce, from the outset, an opposite tendency. This disrespect which, under a Federal Constitution, a person is likely to entertain towards the constituted, ruling powers of the land, is increased by the two-fold allegiance which, in strictness, he owes to the Federal and local Gov¬ ernments. Cases must frequently occur in which a question will arise as to which of the two has the right, and which has not the right, to exert a direct control over his actions. This / 46 being the fact, he will naturally set himself to work, when he wishes those actions to be entirely uncontrolled, to play an adroit game between the two, and eventually, to evade the authorities of both. The facility which such a state of things affords for thus playing off one set of constituted authorities against the other, must leave upon the mind of the indi¬ vidual in question anything but a feeling of respect for either. A further objection to the Federal form of Government may be found in the fact, that it renders widely dissimilar, in different parts of the country, certain institutions which the welfare of the people requires to be everywhere alike. The difference in the Constitutions of the various Confederated States, is itself an evil of no ordinary magnitude, particularly when attended by a difference in the elective franchise. But the principal evil of this class is, that, owing to a number of separate and independent Legislatures, there must be a like number of distinct, legal codes ; and this amongst a people all professing to belong to one and the same nation. That all civil laws—with the exception of a few necessarily local regulations which need not be specially indicated—should be general in their application, throughout the whole nation which acknowledges them, and that the mode of administering them should be uniform to the same extent, are incontrover¬ tible ; and are also too obvious to require any arguments in proof. The evils which must result from any other arrange¬ ment, are too numerous to be specified in these few pages ; but any one may easily ascertain them by tracing out, under the guidance of his own reason, the natural consequences of such other arrangement; or by noticing its actual results in those countries where it is now in operation. The existence, within the territories of a single nation, of a multiplicity of laws—each having a distinct, local application—upon almost every question of human rights ; and of a plurality of courts —each peculiarly constituted and having its peculiar rules of 47 practice—administering those laws ; must, in any case, ham¬ per the ordinary administration of justice, promote the growth of crime, and seriously inconvenience commercial intercourse between the various parts of those territories. In proportion as those territories are geographically near to each other, and as they are alike in climate, natural productions, and the social condition of their inhabitants, those evils will be multi¬ plied and more keenly felt. In fact, one of the principal reasons why a Union of the Provinces is desirable, is that it may remove these evils from them. It does not very mate¬ rially affect the result that the differences in laws, or in the administration of them, are only slight: that there is a dif¬ ference at all, is what makes the difficulty. But the natural consequence of independent, local legislation, is to make those differences greater and more numerous. This kind of legis¬ lation has the additional evil effect of cherishing those local prejudices, and feelings of separate interests which, as already observed, tend so decidedly to the estrangement of each mem¬ ber of a Confederation from its fellows. It may be argued against the validity of these objections to the Federal form of Government generally, that the rapid increase in power, wealth, and general prosperity, which has taken place in the great Confederation of the United States of America, proves them to be not well-founded. It is no part of the object of these remarks to reason, or to speculate upon, the probable future of that republic. It may, however, be observed generally that because the United States have grown so rapidly, under a Federal Constitution, it does not, by any means, follow that such of the peculiarities of that Constitution as are above indicated, have no evil effect. As well might it be argued—as, indeed, it. often and vainly has been—that because, under a system of high protective duties, Great Britain rose to the position of first nation on earth, in power, wealth, and prosperity; therefore such a system must be a sound one, and should not have been abolished. The 48 United States have become great and prosperous in spite of the causes alluded to, not in consequence of them. It might, with much more propriety, be argued, that the Federal Con¬ stitution of the United States furnished a reason why that republic has not, as already shown, p-own m the same ratio as the British North American Provinces. _ That the last of the objections urged against federal Governments is found to be a real objection, in the Unite States, few persons acquainted with that country will pretep to dispute. As to the argument that Federal institutions tend to the political debility and dissolution of the Union wherein they exist, there is nothing to be found m the his¬ tory, or present condition, of those States relative to each other, to controvert it. The partial success which has attended the working of the Federal Constitution, in that republic, has been mainly owing, not to any special virtue in the Constitution itself, but to the peculiar circumstances and feelings of the people—already alluded to—which led, in t ie first place, to the adoption of that Constitution. But not¬ withstanding the favorable feeling of the people towards it, and their sense of the necessity of conforming to its provi¬ sions, at the outset, frequent examples of the mutual jealou¬ sies of the States, of the injuries they inflict upon each other, and of the inability of the Federal Government to reduce to obedience any one of them which may evince a spirit of insubordination, are to be found in the history of thac Confe¬ deration. As notorious and flagrant instances of this latter manifestation of weakness, may be cited the refusal of the Eastern States, during the war of 1812, to furnish, m obedience to the Federal Government and in accordance with the spirit of the Constitution, their contingent of militia to aid in carry¬ ing on the war; the protracted and successful resistance of South Carolina to the confederated authorities, upon the tariff question of 1882—a resistance which became success¬ ful through acts of open rebellion, on the part of that State ; 49 and the “ melancholy acknowledgment ” made by a member of the Washington Cabinet, but a few years since, to a British Minister, that the Federal Government found itself unable to restrain the piratical expeditions of Louisiana. The popula¬ tion of the L nited States is scattered over an immense and productive territory, affording to all abundant facilities for providing for their most pressing wants, and hindering those clashings of vital interests which convulse society and endan¬ ger its peace, in more densely populated countries; the frontiers of that republic are in contact with the territories of no hostile and dangerous power; and its history, as an inde¬ pendent power, has not yet extended over a period of three- quarters of a century. The Federal Constitution has, there¬ fore, not been fairly tried in that republic; and the partial trial which it has had, has been under the most favorable circumstances. The results of that partial trial are anything but favorable to the reputation of such a Constitution ; and when the inevitable progress of events shall subject the United States to those internal social convulsions and compli¬ cations of foreign relations which have proved the most trying ordeal of all Governments, in older nations, we have certainly good grounds for believing that that Constitution, if it shall have existed so long, will be found utterly inadequate to the wants of the country. On turning to the other side of the question, we find that the benefits derived from a Federal Constitution, are patent —so much so as to be discernible by the most superficial observer—and are traceable to a single cause. The evil effects, when carried to an extreme, of the principle of cen¬ tralization in carrying on the operations of Government, are well known. The local interests of every section of the country considerably removed from the centre of authority, must, under an ultra centralization system, suffer severely. The Federal system, by dividing the country into certain sec¬ tions, and giving to each the management, to a great extent, D 50 of its own local affairs, has a directly opposite tendency, and does not conduce to the prosperity of any one of those sec¬ tions at the expense of the others. The mode of its opera¬ tion to produce this effect, is too obvious to require explana¬ tion. Two further observations must be made, however, in connection with this branch of the subject. First, this management, of local affairs is, in each case, conducted by a power, which, at the same time, exercises certain other func¬ tions highly detrimental to the welfare of the nation at large, as already shown. Secondly, these purely local affairs can, it is quite obvious, be managed equally well, if not much better, by a local power not endowed with those objectionable functions. The preceding remarks have reference only to such a Con¬ stitution as we find in operation in the United States of America, not because such a one is the form most usually adopted by Confederations—it being, in strict point of fact, not a Federal Constitution at all; but because it is the least objectionable, with reference to the case of British America, of any which have hitherto borne that name. Nearly every former Confederation, besides having been formed with refer- * ence only to the foreign relations of the Union, has combined States having an entirely distinct nationality. Then as to a Federal Union such as that of the United States, the inferences intended to be drawn from the fore¬ going remarks are, that such a Union, if attempted, w’ould be repugnant to the feelings of the several Provincial Legis¬ latures ; that, if not so regugnant to the Colonies, such a Union could not go into operation except by virtue of a dives¬ ture of authority, on the part of the Mother Country, which is of a problematical occurrence ; that, supposing this condi¬ tion fulfilled, such a Union could be effected only by a radical change in the Provincial Constitutions, making that of the elective body, and those of the various subordinate Provinces, all essentially different from the Constitution which now 51 prevails in each ; that, if effected, there is no probability of its working with even ordinary success, owing to the compli¬ cation of machinery employed and the multiplicity of interests involved ; and that, if, by any means, some of these interests were withdrawn and this machinery simplified, so as to make a Federal Government at all practicable in British America, the peculiar advantages derivable from a Government of that form, would be more than counterbalanced by the disad¬ vantages. None of these objections are applicable to the plan of a Legislative Union of the Provinces ; if, indeed, any valid objection to it can be found. Such a Union could take place immediately, and without any change whatever in the Consti¬ tution which each now possesses, or in their relation to the Mother Country. No political movement, pregnant with such important results, could be more simple ; nor, if a Union is so much desired as a very general expression of opinion renders evident, more easy. The formation of the Union would, in fact, necessitate no greater change, in any Province, than a mere change in the seat of Government. It would not neces¬ sarily follow that, from this centralization of Provincial Legis¬ lative and Executive authorities, the local interests of remote portions of the Union would sutler, as is generally found to be the case under such circumstances. Reforms in internal policy have already been adopted in a part of British America, which, if made general, would effectually prevent any such injurious result. The principle of Municipal Cor¬ porations, which has been acted upon with such complete success in Canada, and which is now so extensively advocated in the Lower Provinces, furnishes ample security against any abuses of the centralization system. The plan of having the whole country divided into counties ; and then again into townships, towns, and cities, each forming a Municipal Cor¬ poration and having the entire management of its exclusively local affairs; would provide, under the proposed Union, a 52 more immediate and effective protection to local interests than could be afforded by that of allowing each Province to retain, for that purpose, its present cumbrous and expensive government machinery. At the same time, no one of those Municipalities, however perfectly organized, could ever be¬ come dangerous, or even very troublesome, as a rebel against the authority of the general Government, a statement which certainly could not be predicated of any Province, under a continuance of its present, political organization. An arrange¬ ment of this kind would indeed be, in one sense, a Federal Union ; but it would form a Confederation, not of five Pro¬ vinces, but of some 140 counties and cities ; and one differing essentially, both in its nature and operation, from any which has preceded it. It is more than probable, that public undertakings would be found necessary requiring the co-operation of several of these Municipalities ; and that questions of a purely local nature would arise, requiring the joint consideration of several of them. To provide for such cases, the principle of County Corporations could be carried a step further and applied to certain larger sections of country, each comprising several counties ; so that all legislation of that tedious, burdensome, and frequently injudicious character which is employed about “ private bills”—all, in short, which is purely local in its character, but no more than this , would be thrown off the central Parliament and entrusted to those who are best quali¬ fied to deal with it. An arrangement of precisely this nature, for the United Kingdom, has been, in a late number of the Westminster Review, ably advocated by a writer who, as a liberal and philosophical expounder of political science, is probably unequalled by any of the present century. It is spoken of as a scheme the realization of which, in that country, can be hoped for only in the remote future. Here the case is different. Political changes can be easily and immediately effected, in a new country such as this, which it would require many years of difficulty to impose upon the prejudices which exist in the British Isles. As already observed, the formation of a Legislative Union necessitates no material change in the present Constitutions of the Provinces. The incorporation of counties is not an essential, preparatory measure. Without any extension of that system beyond the limits within which it now exists in British America, local affairs would be nearly, if not quite, as well managed, and local interests as well protected, even after the Union, as they now are under the disunion. But the scheme of Municipal Corporations furnishes an answer to the only serious objection which can be made to the Union. The extension of municipal rights and privileges to every county in British North America will, doubtless, take place, at no distant day, whether a Legislative Union is ever effected or not. The formation of Municipal Counties, and of those larger and similar organizations already referred to, should, and it can scarcely be doubted, would immediately follow such a Union. Only two objections have ever been publicly made to a Legislative Union of these Provinces; and they are so nearly groundless as scarcely to require any serious answer. One is, the difference of race which exists among the inhabitants of the Provinces. It is argued that the people of Canada East, being of French origin, would not closely and cordially unite with their Anglo-Saxon fellow subjects. One great object to be obtained by the Union is a complete breaking down of all local prejudices, and a fusion of races, through¬ out the Provinces. That such would be its speedy result, if the Union were maintained, there can be no doubt; and that it could be maintained is clearly proved by the present con¬ dition of Canada itself. Almost every species of disaster was predicted of that country, a few years since, when a Legislative Union of the two Provinces it formerly com¬ prised, was first carried into operation ; yet we find that the 54 closest possible, political union of the two most antagonistic races in British America has been effected in Canada, with complete success, and has been followed by a continuance of prosperity unparalleled in the former history of that country, or in that of any other country on earth. The other objection is, that much inconvenience would arise from the remoteness of some parts of the United Provinces from the seat of Government, wherever that might be. To this it may be said, that the same objection might be made to the Canadian Union; but no serious inconvenience of this kind is there found to exist. The distance from Quebec, the present capital of Canada, to Sandwich, the county town of Essex, Canada West, is greater than from Quebec to Sydney, the most remote county town in Nova Scotia. When the line of railway between Halifax and Quebec, now actually com¬ menced at the two termini and upon an intermediate section of the line, shall have been completed between those two points, Halifax will virtually be nearer to Quebec, than Anti- gonish or Annapolis now is to Halifax. That such a railway communication will, within a very few years, be completed, scarce any one now pretends to doubt; and the consumma¬ tion of the work, so desirable for other reasons as well as those of a political nature, would be hastened by a Legisla¬ tive Union of the Provinces. A Union of the Provinces, upon the plan above briefly sketched out, w^ould supply all those wants so keenly felt by British Americans, and which are mentioned in a former part of this pamphlet. It is certainly not too much to say that the Reformed British Constitution proposed by that plan is the best suited to the feelings and w’ants of an intelligent and free people; the best calculated to develop their energies, and promote their prosperity and happiness ; the most likely to bind a number of petty, detached nationalities into a com¬ pact and powerful empire ; in short, the most perfect, of any Constitution which either the mere force of circumstances, or 55 political foresight, has ever yet put into operation. And for British America, with her immense yet thinly-peopled ter¬ ritories ; her vast, undeveloped resources, and superior geographical position; united under a Constitution so admir¬ ably adapted to extend and consolidate her power, to preserve and promote her prosperity; it surely would not be presump¬ tion to predict a most glorious and happy future. The accomplishment of the Union will depend almost entirely upon the action of the Provincial Legislatures ; for it is evident that it is now neither the interest, nor the inclination of Great Britain to resist any reasonable demand of the united Provinces. And surely this is not an unrea¬ sonable demand, even though it amounts—as it really does —to the formation of them into a compact, powerful, and virtually independent State. The time has now arrived— and all interested in this subject feel that it has arrived— when British America must cease to walk in leading strings —to occupy the humble position of a mere dependency of the British Crown. She has now attained her national majority, and possesses a degree of strength and vigor which entitle her to stand beside the Mother Country. It is the obvious interest then of Great Britain to draw more closely and firmly the connection between the two, by making it depend solely upon community of interests and obligations of honor; and to make the Provinces a means of support, not a cause of weakness, to herself, by removing all needless restraints upon their freedom and by aiding in the development of their strength. All this she may do by effecting a Legislative Union of those Provinces, and entrusting to them the entire management of their own local affairs. British America may then become a member of another Confederation upon the vast and widely scattered territories of which “ the sun never sets”—a Confederation the grandest that the world ever saw —the Confederation of the British Empire. A UNION OF THE COLONIES OP BRITISH NORTH AMERICA, CONSIDERED NATIONALLY. 1856 . British America has its fair share of the political evils which seem to be inseparable from the condition of even a free people, living under a constitutional Government, so long as that people remains imperfectly educated and blemished by the moral imperfections which have ever char¬ acterized human nature. We have our occasional victories of wrong over right , our unreasonable party animosities, our selfish and noisy political factions, our narrow prejudices of race, creed, and locality, using the most valuable and dearly cherished institutions of the country to inflict injuries upon it. But there is reason to believe, and a consolation in believing, that even among those who take the most prominent and active part in this turmoil and clashing of selfish interests, there is, beneath the narrower selfish passions so patent in their ordinary conduct, a broad substratum of patriotism and national spirit. For instance, amid all our sectional jealousies and party rivalries, there is one great national movement which has been proposed, and which, at least, has not met 58 with disapproval in any part of British America. We allude to the proposed Union of the British North American Colonies. It is true that this question of Union has never yet been brought very directly home to the British American people. They have never yet been called upon to decide, positively and immediately, whether it shall take place, or not. But the proposed Union has been, for some time, pretty freely canvassed by the press and by leading public men, in all parts of British America, and has been formally submitted to the consideration of the legislatures in two of the Provinces —Canada and Nova Scotia ;—and the entire absence, as yet, of any public indication of opposition to it, is a very significant fact. But although it may be said—as, for many reasons, we believe it reasonably may—that the leading statesmen of British America are profoundly impressed with the importance of the projected Union, and that a majority of the well-informed classes look forward to its consummation with favorable eyes ; still it is important that the masses should be instructed with regard to it—still more important that all classes should be impressed with a sense of the necessity for early action in the matter. It is but natural that pressing and immediate wants should engage more atten¬ tion than future advantages ; that our Provincial politicians should give more consideration to questions of local interest than to those more remote ones of national importance. It is the duty of those who can perceive the evils at times arising from this ever-narrowing policy, to endeavor to restrain it within its proper limits. It is therefore the duty of such, in this instance, to lead the minds of the great body of the people away from party squabbles and exclusively local legislation, to a consideration of this important subject of British American nationality. To do this, is something which comes especially within the province of the press. A Union of these Colonies, considered upon broad, national grounds, not with reference to its bearing upon existing class grievances and local interests, is a somewhat difficult subject to write upon. That the British North American Provinces should be politically combined into a single compact nation, appears almost self-evident. There are no arguments, few, if any, plausible objections, against such a project, to be com¬ bated. Why were they ever disunited ? It was accident, not design, which led to their original organization as sep¬ arate Colonies. The territory which they comprise fell under the dominion of the British Crown at different periods, a fact which accounts in part for their separate organization. In the early stages of their history as Colonies, they consisted but of so many wildernesses, each containing a small nucleus of peopled territory. These settled spots were far distant from each other, separated by unexplored wilds, and, with the means of communication in use at that day, intimate intercourse between them was impossible. A separate Colonial Government for each was indispensable. The causes which rendered separate Governments necessary, in the first instance* are now removed. There is now no reason for a continuance of them unless we admit the validity of that last and poorest argument which ultra conservatism makes use of against every projected reform: “it must continue to be, because it always has been.” The natural barriers which once separated these Provinces from each other, are now in a great measure removed; those which remain are only artificial. They are like brothers who, owing to some misfortune, have been far removed from each other in infancy, each scarcely conscious of the other’s existence ; but who now, when in the full vigor of manhood, find themselves face to face, conscious of the natural ties which exist between them. For brothers, under such circum¬ stances, to remain coldly aloof from each other, in accordance with the most chilling conventionalities ever observed in society between utter strangers, instead of cordially joining 60 hands with the determination of spending the remainder of their days in mutual intercourse and fraternal love, would be scarcely more ridiculous than for the North American Provinces to remain longer sundered by the useless forms of a plurality of Colonial Governments. These Provinces now find themselves face to face. The wildernesses which once separated them have been prostrated, or penetrated in every direction, by the stalwart backwoodsman; the savages who once infested those forests have ceased to be a terror, and may be said no longer to exist; the obstacles which distance and which gulfs and seas formerly interposed to their mutual intercourse, are now in a great measure removed by modern science and skill. The communication between any two of the Provinces is now almost as free as that which exists between the different parts of any one of them; and an immediate effect of their political Union would be to make it quite as much so. Should any persons object to the distance of the remote sections of British America from each other as presenting great obstacles to the practicability of such a Union, they should bring to recollection the facilities which science and the engineering skill of the present day, as com¬ pared with that of the past, afford for overcoming all such difficulties. Within the memory of men still living, it required as much time to journey from Sydney to Halifax, or from the coast of Bay Chaleur to Fredericton as is now required to go from Halifax to Toronto. For near a hundred years after the Union of England and Scotland, the journey or voyage from Edinburgh to London was not usually made in less than a week. By passing across the State of Maine, Quebec or Montreal may now be reached from Halifax in thirty-six hours. But without going into a foreign country at all, when the railroads now in course of construction in the Lower Provinces are completed, the journey from Halifax to Quebec may be made with ease and comfort in three days. Complete the chain of* railway which all believe must, within a very few years, 61 bind the Provinces together, whether they become politically more closely connected or not; and the time will not occupy more than thirty-six hours, at the slowest rate of railway travelling. When the construction of this one wanting link in the railway chain, comprising the distance from Mirarnichi, or Woodstock, in New Brunswick, to Trois Pistoles, in Canada, shall have been undertaken and completed, the time occupied in travelling over the entire length of the Provinces, from 1800 to 2000 miles, will not be more than half that now required to make the journey from one extremity of Nova Scotia to the other, along our ordinary post roads. Again, the facilities for communication by letter, within and between the Colonies, have undergone a still more strik¬ ing improvement. Ten years ago, it required at least ten days lor a letter to pass between Halifax and the western¬ most towns of Canada. The invention of the electric tele¬ graph has effected a great revolution in this matter. There are no two towns, or villages, of a thousand inhabitants, in these Provinces which do not now communicate with each other, by telegraph, in half a day, and which may not do so in one hour. The progress of their individual development has now brought the Provinces into immediate contact with each o # other. They are separated by no natural obstacles to their union ; they are subject to the same Crown ; they are gov¬ erned according to the same constitutional principles ; they enjoy substantially the same laws; they have the same great interests in common; they are every day attracted more closely towards each other by commercial intercourse and fraternal feeling; and there is no good reason, no plausible pretext for longer upholding the artificial barriers which still hinder them from becoming one to all intents and purposes. British North America occupies, at the present time, a singularly anomalous position. It presents the spectacle of a country inhabited by a people of whom it is no empty boast to say they are not inferior in enlightenment and intelligence to any in the world. They enjoy a constitutional Govern¬ ment, have been entrusted with the entire control of all their exclusively internal alfairs, and have shown themselves not less capable of self-government than any other people. Yet they have no voice whatever in anything which concerns their relations with foreign countries. British North America comprises, at this moment, the materials of a prosperous and powerful nation, and contains the elements which, under favorable circumstances for development, will speedily make of it an empire inferior in power and influence to no one that has hitherto flourished upon earth. Yet it has no national existence whatever—it is a nonentity in the commonwealth of nations. On several occasions, the Provinces have experienced not only the mortification but the serious injury to their interests which must naturally attend this peculiarity of their position. In two instances, large portions of our territory have been conceded to the United States. Great Britain gained nothing by the transactions, whilst British America incurred serious osses, and losses wliich must be felt more and more with the apse of tune. On a more recent occasion, the invaluable fisheries of our country were given away to the United States without any adequate return being made for them. This latter assertion may be denied. It may even be con¬ tended that British America has, by its own acts, admitted the justice of the. Fishery Treaty of 1854 ; but the assent of the Provinces to an arrangement from which there was no escape, scarcely amounts to an admission either of the justice or expediency, of such an arrangement. But without enter¬ ing into this question at all, it cannot be denied that, in each of these instances, the British Government, whilst treating with a foreign power relative to matters in which the North American section of the Empire was especially—nay, almost exclusively—interested, ignored the existence of these Provinces. In these instances, the injustice experienced by the Colonies was not of that immediately oppressive character which could provoke, or which would warrant, any rebellious acts on the part of the British Americans; but a considera¬ tion of them leads directly to certain inferences which cannot be too deeply impressed upon the minds of our readers. The whole Provinces of North America, as at present organized, have no voice in the British Imperial Government, and have no means of exercising any control over its acts. We know from actual experience that when their interests conflict with those of the single city of Manchester, or of any class, party, or section of Great Britain, they must be disregarded. The latter can make their influence felt in the Imperial Parlia¬ ment ; for they are represented there. The former are not so represented, and they have no equivalent means of exert¬ ing an influence upon the Imperial Government. Mere remonstrances on their part will be unheeded. Within the last few weeks, a project of the Imperial Gov¬ ernment has been shadowed forth in the Ministerial organ, for transporting the felons of Great Britain to the Hudson Bay Territory. This would be equivalent to making the North American Provinces so many penal Colonies. There is nothing to prevent the transported convicts from making their way direct to Canada, except a toilsome journey such as the hunters and voyageurs of Hudsonia think nothing of, a journey which no one who had lived a few months in that territory would consider a serious difficulty in the way of getting out of it, if he were disposed to do so. It has never been the habit of British statesmen to recede from a position once taken upon any point relating to the Colonies ; and it is not probable that they will do so in this instance. The cases just mentioned may, by some persons, not be considered as involving very serious grievances. But admit the principle, and what may it not lead to ? We have no security that the dearest interests of British America may 64 not be sacrificed to further a pet project of some British statesman, or to gratify the desires, or appease the wrath, of some foreign ally. The Colonies possess no means of pre¬ venting such a misfortune. Nor is it at all without the bounds of probability that such may occur and be deeply injurious, if not ruinous, to British American interests. In stating such an opinion, and in asserting that the Imperial Government has already, in treating with foreign powers, ignored the interests of these Colonies, we mean to attribute to British statesmen no remarkable degree of moral turpitude, or political baseness. Admit them to be endowed with intellect, wisdom, and moral sense not very far above the average of men, we have no right to expect that they will be very ready to perceive, or evince any remarkable degree of vigor in guarding, the interests of this remote and colonial portion of the Empire. The education of the British states¬ man must naturally make him intimate only with “ Home” politics, certainly not with those of the Colonies. His con¬ stant dependence for his position upon the approval of the people of the United Kingdom, ensures his making their wel¬ fare his first consideration. That of the Colonies, whose approval, or disapproval, cannot affect him in any way, will be considered a matter of little moment. How will a Union of the Colonies remedy all this ? It will not enable the British Americans, like the people of the United Kingdom, to exert a direct control over members of the Imperial Government. No ; but it will give to their country such a standing that no British statesman will believe that he can any longer venture to treat it as a political nonentity, for it would challenge the respect of the Imperial authorities. Nor, in such an event, could a British Horae Government outrage the feelings, or trample upon the interests of the young nation with impunity. It could not then be con¬ sidered a sufficient guarantee of the safety of British Amer¬ ican interests that a Colonial Secretary sat in the British v 65 Cabinet. Some more special representation in Downing Street, or at St. James’s, would then be considered essential when the relations between British America and any foreign power came under discussion. But in whatever way the connecting link between the Mother Country and these Colo¬ nies was maintained, the latter—forming, as they would, a compact State embracing a vast territory rich in untold resources, a State advancing in wealth and strength with almost unparalleled strides, and inhabited by a free and aspiring people—would form a nation which no outside power could venture to injure, or to insult; and if anything of the kind were attempted, British America would not submit to it. Although still a dependency of the British Crown and a section of the British Empire, the North American Colonies would then be entitled to and would receive from all foreign powers the consideration and respect due to an independent nation, and to a nation of the first rank. The people of this country would also, as British Americans, then receive that consideration among foreigners, the absence of which has been deeply felt and complained of by almost every North Amer¬ ican Colonist who has passed beyond the borders of his native Province. The circumstances in which the North American Colonies are now placed, considered in connection with their future capabilities as compared with those of most other countries, render it incumbent upon them to make the most of their means and opportunities. We mean that it is incumbent upon them, not merely with a view to their own selfish ends, but in order fitly to discharge their responsibilities to the human race in the aggregate. Great and solemn responsi¬ bilities seem to be imposed upon British America and a lofty and bright career marked out for it, by the capabilities of its situation. The poetical and popular legend that “ Westward the star of empire holds its way” may not be so entirely true as to authorize its employment as a premise in an argu- E 66 ment; but its truth seems to be borne out in a great measure by the history of the civilized world. The countries from which the monarchs of the Assyrian and Babylonian Empires, in the earliest ages of history, dic¬ tated laws to the world, are now among the most desert and barbarous upon earth. The jackal roams undisturbed upon the site of Nineveh, and the crocodile may sport in the waters which sweep over the ruins of Babylon; and it is considered among the great triumphs of modern learning, skill, and ingenuity that the spot where either of these wondrous cities once stood can now be pointed out. Egypt also, which once from its gigantic palaces radiated wisdom and glory over the world, may now be called figuratively—and is almost literally— a desert. Egypt, although waking in a new life, is governed bv a vassal of the weakest sovereign in Europe ; and its social position is but little superior to its political rank. Greece, their successor in the race of civilization and the possession of empire, is now a chaos of marble ruins. As a nation she has just commenced the toilsome task of undoing the work of nineteen centuries of barbarism. The same dark tide has swept over her still mightier successor, Rome. Coming down to a comparatively modern period, we find the sceptre of the civilized world swayed in turn by various nations of Western Europe ; although now Britain, if any, may claim the rank of mistress of the world. But are we to sup¬ pose that Europe will continue to hold that proud position at the head of the world which she has occupied for the last five or six centuries ? In the present aspect ^ of that continent, one may well ask, in some perplexity, where next will the sun of civilization extend its brightest rays ? Where next will Truth take her strongest stand in the great warfare of opinions ? and what country shall next be the instructress of nations and the glory of the world ? Presuming that the development of men, or of nations, in all that can ennoble them, or add to their permanent strength, can take place 67 only under conditions of civil freedom and security of free¬ dom, the prospects of Europe, for many, many years, appear gloomy in the extreme. The present condition of that quarter of the world is obviously that of a smoldering volcano about to break forth ; and we believe the most of those now living in the world will yet feel the earthquake shocks when the eruption does come. Even now, comparatively silent as Europe is, there is, in almost its every corner, a terrible life and death struggle going on between Liberty and Despotism ; and through the stillness we may frequently hear the growl¬ ing thunder that forbodes the coming political storm. In France, Italy, the Austrain Empire, and most parts of Ger¬ many, we see regal power, long the aggressor, now “ with terror and with toil ” grappling with the shackled and maddened people to bind yet heavier chains upon them, just as we may have seen a sane man in mortal struggle with a maniac. The condition of Spain, sad although it is, is better than theirs ; for her spoke in Fortune’s wheel has, in its revo¬ lution, commenced to move upwards. If Russia is more quiet, it is because she is more barbarous; for there the millions of serfs turn not against the despotic heel that crushes them only because they do not know that they are trodden upon. The Scandinavian nations are cowed by the perpetual menace of Russia,—a power which, like a huge iceberg, sheds a chill over all which hang upon its shores, and threatens every moment, to crush them beneath its weight. But neither the Czar of Russia, nor any other absolute monarch will be able long to repress the uprising of the people of Europe. The maniac, although a maniac, will be free. And, although it may be said as an excuse for holding the people in abject submission, that, like the waters of a river from which a long-standing obstruction has been removed, when once free they will deluge the land and overwhelm every work of human hands that they meet in their torrent-like course, the deluge is none the less inevitable nevertheless. / Pile the dam as high as you will, the waters beyond it will still mount higher ; and the longer the flood is repressed, the more terrible will be its power when freed. We can but indicate, without attempting to describe those aspects of the affairs of Europe which we believe to bear upon our subject. That the oppressed nationalities of Europe are about commencing openly to battle for freedom, appears all but certain. Every unsuccessful attempt will, it is quite certain, make the condition of that continent worse than it was before. And when the day of final success does come, as come it must, there must still a long and troubled period of probation elapse before Europe can settle down in peace and prosperity; for it would be as useless to expect a child to leap from his nurse’s arms into the rank and society of adult men and there discharge creditably all the duties per¬ taining to their experienced condition, as to suppose that a nation just freed from the restraints of despotism will, until taught by experience, evince a faculty of rational self-gov¬ ernment. From these causes we may anticipate that a long night of wars and tumults with all their sad concomitants, is about to settle upon Europe—a night none the less dark from the certainty that it will end in a bright morning at last. With such dark clouds obscuring the firmament of Europe, is it unreasonable to suppose that “ the Star of Empire” will shortly take its course to the skies of some country or countries beyond the oceans which girt the Old World ? If so, some of the British Colonies must be the favored lands, for the United States of America have already proved a miserable failure. We are not going to repeat the oft and vainly uttered assertion that Britain too has passed its cul¬ minating point, and is now on the decline. Whether this is the fact, or not, need not change the drift of our remarks. It seems, at all events, clear that any important accessions of national strength and influence which Britain may hereafter receive must come through and by her Colonies. The time must come before long when, like the aged father who sees himself outstripped by the youthful vigor of his children, yet lives a new and more eventful life in them, our Mother Country must be content to rely mainly upon the strength and found her brightest hopes upon the deeds of her Colonial oflspring. She may be the centre of gravity around which they revolve ; but their’s must be the substance—the momentum which shall move the world. There is no part of those vast colonial possessions which seems, at the present time, so admirably calculated to fonn in itself a great and powerful empire—whether wholly inde¬ pendent, or one of a federation—as that section forming the North American Provinces. Whilst, with this object in view, the advantages which British America now possesses are unsurpassed, the obstacles which would naturally impede its success are fewer and more inconsiderable than would be met with by any other country on earth. We are not disposed to inculcate any fatalistic dogma of “ manifest destiny.” As a general rule the manifest destiny of nations, as of individuals, is what they themselves determine to make it. The British Americans should therefore be up and at work carving out their own national destiny and determined to make it a glorious one; and not wait to see what the chances of the times will do for them. Destiny has already brought them into a position to take the flood in the tide which leads on to fortune, and in their case, to national splendor, and to the command of at least the New World. They will be failing in their “ mission” both in what concerns themselves and the human race in general if they allow the golden opportunity to pass. We have endeavored, as well as the small space which we could devote to the subject would permit, to show that the peculiar responsibilities of the British Americans, as at present situated, demand that they should strive to attain the position and the higher responsibilities of a respectable and 70 potent nationality. There is every reason to believe that the longings of the people themselves tend in that direction. Whether that tendency is sufficiently strong to lead to an early consummation of so desirable a result, is the only question. The desire, on the part of the British Americans, for national eminence is, of course, rather an ambitious feeling than the result of a conviction of great public duties to be performed. It is useless to enquire into the causes of such a feeling. It is enough for our present purpose to know that it exists, and that it is not undesirable that it should exist. The desire for national eminence is as deeply implanted in our nature and almost as nearly universal as the love of individual distinction. The more free and intelligent the people, the more widely is such a desire diffused among them and the stronger it burns. Everything in the circumstances of the British American people tends to stimulate such a feeling. They are not, like so many others, subject to the caprices of a despotic will, or ground down by tyrannical enactments, so as to feel that existence itself must be the first, the all-absorbing consideration. They have passed beyond the circle within which the bare necessities of national existence engage all the energies ; and have now some spare capital of physical and intellectual vigor which they desire to expend in what we may call the luxuries of nationality— a world-wide name, an eminent rank, an extensive influence, and all the brilliant advantages attending them. It can have no cooling effect upon such aspirations to know that their realization must be attended with irksome burdens and harassing responsibilities, any more than the ambitions of an individual man could be checked by similar warnings. Yet the young man, and the aged one too, with all the experience of three-score years and ten, still strive upwards, although certain that every new step on the ladder will bring its additional burdens and anxieties. In the case both of the nation and the individual, it is right that it should be so. 71 Had it been otherwise, men would all still be living in wigwams, or burrowing in the earth, in primitive wretched¬ ness, like the savages of some of the Californian plains. The British Americans, considered as a distinct people, are an offshoot from a nation notoriously the most ambitious and the most successfully ambitious in the modern world. The view of the great achievements of the Mother Country is a constant incentive to British America to go and do like¬ wise. It is not just to assert the unreasonableness of such a desire, and to urge that in all which relates to nationality the latter country should consider itself identical with the former. It would be scarcely less reasonable to insist that, so far as the execution of all ambitious projects is concerned, the indi¬ vidual man should merge his personal indentity in the nation to which he belongs, and live My for his country and with¬ out being known to do so. However closely the British Ame¬ ricans must and do consider themselves connected with the Mother Country, by natural affection, loyalty, political bonds and similarity of interests, they nevertheless cannot but feel that they are a separate and distinct people. This feeling is intensified by the consciousness that, with however much ^fnlt Vy may be treated by their fellow-subjects of Great Britain, they yet occupy a political rank almost immea¬ surably inferior to that of the latter. . A in the natural longings of British America for national consideration, arc stimulated by the immediate P reS ^^°^^^ youn ir nations enjoying all the distinction and marks of respect which independence gives; but in all other respects so similarly drcumstanced that the Provincialist feels constantly mchned ZZk with dissatisfaction why there is this great difference between them. And what is done by Great Britain to satis y these very natural and honorable “ aspirations to be great . Nothin- whatever. We admit that she should not be expected to do much except to refrain from throwing any obstacles in L 4 o? £ upward progress of British America. As we 72 have already observed, the people of this country must themselves must work out their own national destiny. That Great Britain will hinder their doing so after the plan we are now advocating, there seems no reason to suppose. But P it is undeniable that Britain has always been in the habit of checking everything like a demonstration of distinct nationality on the part of her Colonies ; and there is no A reason to doubt that she will continue to manifest such a policy towards the Provinces while they continue thus dis¬ united and comparatively powerless. This she may con- a tinue to do quietly, with the most provoking coolness, without making any deviation from the policy pursued for cen¬ turies, and therefore without seeming to inflict any flagrant injury upon, or quite outrage any feeling of, the colonists. Wars will be engaged in which may seriously injure this country ; treaties with foreign countries will be entered into which may deeply affect our interests ; but we must silently abide by the consequences. British America will continue to | see the most inconsiderable of foreign nations treated with every mark of deference, whilst it is regarded as a political nonentity. We can think of nothing with which to compare the anom¬ alous political position of the British Americans except the social condition of the few aboriginal Indians who still stroll about our forests and shores. These Indians have perfect liberty to come and go as they please, without their legal right to go anywhere off the public highway being acknowledged; to abide by their own customs, provided they do not infringe any general law of the land. We acknowledge them as fel¬ low-countrymen and fellow-subjects, and in cases of emer¬ gency they may claim and receive the protection of our laws; yet we deny them the right of suffrage under our Constitu¬ tion ; we possess ourselves of property without considering any claim which they may have therein ; and we frame gene¬ ral legislative enactments without any regard whatever to their interests. We are compelled by the evidence of our senses to acknowledge their existence; yet in every act, pub¬ lic or private, of which they are not the direct object, we quite ignore their existence. In a remarkably similar man¬ ner are the more privileged fellow-countrymen of these In¬ dians treated by their fellow-subjects on the other side of the Atlantic.. We may enjoy our own possessions, plod on within our own borders, get as rich as we can, manage our own exclusively internal affairs, provided that in so doing we do not in anything run counter to the wishes of our brethren at “ home” ; yet the latter, when not directly treating with us, act in all things as if we had no existence at all. British America seeks companionship with the parent State ; Great Britain, not even recognizing the manifestations of 3uch a feel¬ ing, yet graciously bows “ the very humble servant” of the least respectable of foreign nations. A notable instance of this was witnessed during the last war. In no part of Grea,t Britain itself was there a more general and fervid zeal mani¬ fested for the national cause than in British America. This country had a disposition to do anything and everything which its limited ability would admit of to aid the Mother Country in that struggle. Offers were repeatedly made to raise colo¬ nial troops for the British army—offers which, if favorably received, would have been followed up with vigor and attended by a success which could have brought no discredit upon the British arms, and would have been a source of pride and satis¬ faction to the Colonies. The British Government coldly— and, may we not add, contemptuously?—declined the proffered services, but ran into a whole series of broils by endeavoring tn AnlUt. t.bo mercenarv vagabonds of hostile, foreign states. reject any such offer, although humble ; and will have a satis¬ faction in finding that these Provinces, from having become united and consequently strengthened, are in a position to render her substantial assistance. 74 It wduld be useless to ask that the British American should be placed upon the same footing, politically speaking, as the native of the United Kingdom. It would be scarcely possible to grant such a request. The one must always have a direct influence upon the Imperial Government; the other, only an indirect one. The latter must continue to occupy, in many respects, a more distinguished position than the former. But there is no good reason why the British American should con¬ tinue in a position so immeasurably inferior to that of his more favored fellow-subjects. A Union of the Provinces would immediately lessen the distance between him and them ; and we may reasonably hope, ultimately annihilate it altogether. It would elevate British America to a national standing ; give it moral weight in the councils of the Mother Country and change the machinery which now connects them ; and raise the British American people in their own estimation and in the estimation of the world. It will be said that a Legislative Union of the Provinces will place them in a position of virtual independence with respect to the parent State as well as to other nations. Grant that it will do so. It may then be urged as an objection to such a course, that it is altogether a novel one. The position which these Provinces now occupy is, politically speaking, quite a novel one. Men, whether individually, or in communities, are ever seeking precedents for any step they may contemplate taking. The precedent—that of the United States—which most readily presents itself to a British American’s mind in thinking of this Union, leads him to contemplate a Federal Union, one of the worst political organizations that the art of man ever contrived. The uninventive inclination to follow slavishly the most familiar examples, causes the still existing fragment of a Canadian faction to hug the absurd and degrading idea of attaining a nationality by rebellion and annexation to the United States. We have no intention of contending that precedent should be wholly disregarded in making political 75 changes ; hut it must he remembered that to contend for the necessity of an example to follow in every case is to put a stop to all human progress. It is needless for these Provinces, in contemplating any steps towards independent nationality, to seek for a precedent which will just suit their case. They can find none. The old Roman Colonies—Britain, for instance—were cast off and thrown upon their own resources, owing to the inability of the parent State to protect herself, or them, from foreign conquest. They, each in turn, submitted to foreign conquest and thus became so many distinct nations. The condition of the Neth¬ erlands when rebelling against the yoke of Spain, furnishes no parallel whatever to that of British America now. The case of the United States also, at the commencement of the revolution¬ ary war, was quite dissimilar to that of British America, at the present time. They had always enjoyed a degree of national independence hitherto unknown to these Provinces ; and at last a rupture with the Mother Country upon-a matter of vital moment led, by an open rebellion, to their entire separation from her. The people of Mexico and of the great Spanish Colonies of South America, took up arms against the short¬ lived Bonaparte dynasty of Spain. Circumstances growing out of this first outbreak led them to transfer their hostility from the monarch to the kingdom which he ruled, and resulted finally in their independence. The case of Brazil just pre¬ vious to its attaining independence, furnishes many points of resemblance to that of British America at the present time ; yet it too is different Brazil, at the time of its separation from Portugal, had far outgrown the proportions of a Colonial dependency. Yet the relations between the two continued to be of the most friendly nature. Their final and complete separation was effected without bloodshed and, we might say, amicably; yet it was brought about by a singular tram of ♦ accidents such as may never occur again. The people of British America entertain feelings of the 76 most devoted loyalty towards their Sovereign and attachment towards Great Britian. They have no cause of complaint against the parent State which would warrant any violent measures for effecting a separation, even if they had the power of using such with effect; nor do they desire such a separation. All they wish—all that their circumstances require, is for them to be elevated in the political scale to a national rank. This can be done, without making any wider separation between the Provinces and Great Britain than already exists, and without any political convulsions, by K bringing about a Legislative Union of the former and by some modifications of the absurd machinery of the Colonial Office. if . The means proposed for attaining this end are novel; the precise object thus to be attained has had no parallel in the history of nations ; but the means and the object are not more new than the circumstances which suggest the one and demand i the other. ^ Certainly-it is no less the interest of Great Britain than of British North America, that the latter should become influen¬ tial and powerful whilst still maintaining the closest con¬ nection with her. There is no independent State, however powerful, that, in the national tumults in which it has at times been involved, has not felt itself constrained to employ means and submit to indignities at the contemplation of which an indi¬ vidual man might blush, in order to strengthen its position by forming alliances with other States. Yet the precarious nature of such alliances, the rottenness of their foundation, and their costliness to those who seek them, have become proverbial among statesmen and historians. No nation of modern times has expended more and profited less by such alliances, than Great Britian. Admit that there has been and will still be « for a time reasonable pretext for pursuing such a policy, is # there any reason why Britain should forever go on entreating, plotting, subsidizing, outraging her own principles, to secure allies only, in nine cases out of ten, to be cheated, or betrayed, 77 by them at last ? The British Empire including colonies of immense extent in every quarter of the world, comprises an aggregate area of over four millions of square miles, and contains more than 200 millions of inhabitants. These Colonies have never yet taken any conspicuous part in the great national con¬ tests in which the Mother Country has so long and with scarcely any intermission been involved. It is even argued that they are a source of weakness to Great Britain. There is certainly little prospect of any reliance being placed in them for much actual assistance so long as they continue in the humble con¬ dition of mere dependencies. But should it not be the policy of Great Britain to seek to develop the strength of her great colonial empires, to foster a national feeling in each of them, and to raise them, as opportunities occur to favor such a course, from the condition of dependencies to a rank more nearly approaching that of allies; yet of allies more closely connected to her by blood and interest than any foreign States can ever be ? Were such a policy to be commenced even now, the time could not be remote when, closely leagued with those vast Colonial nations of North America, India, Australia, and The Cape—each in itself an empire—Great Britain might regard with indifference any combination of foreign powers, and indeed set the world at defiance. So far as this country is concerned, such a policy would at once be organized by bringing about, or by sanctioning, a Legislative Union of the North American Provinces. Still keeping out of view those requirements of the pres¬ ent and those local wants, which naturally urge the North American Colonies towards a Union, is not a contemplation of the future which that Union would make sufficient in itself to convert any British American to an ardent advocacy of the measure ? By the mere act of a Legislative Union of Canada, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, and I rince Edward Island, a nation would be founded, and one comprising a territory nearly equal to that of Great Britain, France, and Italy com- r §RiSSi ' M Mill pffPf Si III! • • (Mi inM - $ilp| iH . - RK . 78 bined ; and quite capable of sustaining as dense a population. But there is no reason why the Union policy should be stayed here. Newfoundland is now, for all practical purposes, nearer to Canada than Ireland was to England in 1800 ; and might also come into the new arrangement. Whether so or not, the whole continental portion of British America would, of course, come under the central Government organized by the Union. Of that vast territory over which the Hudson Bay Company now exercises a dominion which it must soon renounce, the world at large is only beginning to learn the value. Between Lake Superior and the Rocky Mountains there lies a tract more extensive than the whole of the organ¬ ized Provinces to the eastward of it, and possessing agricul¬ tural resources superior to theirs. It is watered by many magnificent rivers, the principal of which, the Saskatchewan, ranks upon the North American continent next in length and volume to the Mississippi and the St. Lawrence. It is 1600 miles in length, through 1400 of which it is navigable, and affords the easiest water transit from the Atlantic ocean to the base of the Rocky Mountains. Along the valley of the Saskatchewan is also found the most direct and easiest, if not the only practicable, railway route quite across the North American continent. In this section of British America alone might be poured the whole surplus population of Europe for the next century. This territory, along with that of the now organized Provinces, would, in proportion to its area equal to that of Prussia, or a little more than half that of England, of which it is certainly capable, sustain a population of one hundred and thirty-six millions. Westward of the Rocky Mountains again, we have another immense territory greater in extent than that watered by the Saskatchewan and its tributaries and, according to all accounts, quite equal to it in resources. In the rear of all these and stretching to the Arctic Ocean, lies a still greater expanse of country usually described as a sterile and inhospitable wilderness, 79 and tenanted only by the hardy, adventurous hunter and the Esquimaux. Yet this immense tract abounds in valuable resources, although they differ from those of the rich agricul¬ tural territories which bound it on the south. The rivers which course through it, and Hudson Bay which it almost surrounds, contain wealth for the fisherman to an extent scarcely equalled by any other part of the world, The lands in that cold region have, of course, been but imperfectly explored as yet; but the reports brought back by the scien¬ tific men who have visited it, lead to the belief that it abounds in mineral wealth of almost every description, rendering it questionable if it is much inferior in value to any portion of this continent. To bring these immense territories under one vigorous, local Government; to extend over them an active population, animated by a spirit of nationality, eager to elevate their country in the commonwealth of nations, and possessing all the means as well as the will to do so, these would be the results of a Union of the Colonies. To adopt such a mea¬ sure, would be to found an Empire, and an Empire which, with its vast territory, its almost unlimited resources for the deve¬ lopment of internal strength, and its unrivalled advantages of geographical position* might soon sway the destinies of the New World, and become, at the same time, the right arm of that power which even now is the greatest upon earth. A Leg¬ islative Union of the North American Colonies is a simple mea¬ sure, easy of consummation; but the magnitude, the grandeur of the results which would spring from it, are incalculable. LETTER* TO HIS GRACE THE DUKE OF NEWCASTLE, UPON A DNION OF THE COLONIES OP BRITISH NORTH AMERICA. 1860.