ARTES 1817 LIBRARY VERITAS SCIENTIA OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN TVEBOR QUÆRIS-PENINSULAM AHINAM” CIRCU PICL INTIHE 2 490 495 RAH ALEXAN BENNET 19 ! i DF 235 Y 78 ! THE HISTORY O F ATHENS. 素 ​· THE HISTORY OF ATHENS POLITICALLY AND PHILOSOPHICALLY CONSIDERED, WITH THE VIEW TO AN INVESTIGATION OF THE Immediate Cauſes of ELEVATION, and of DECLINE, OPERATIVE IN A FREE AND COMMERCIAL STATE. BY WILLIAM YOUN G, Eſq. Θεώρει τὰ γιγνομένα καὶ τὰ συμπιπτοντα καὶ τοῖς ἰδιώταις καὶ τοῖς τυράννοις, ἐὰν γὰρ τὰ παρεληλυθότα μνημονεύης ἄμεινον καὶ περί των μελλόντων βελευσης. Ifocrat. Orat.-ad Nicoclem, LONDON: PRINTED FOR J. ROBSON, NEW-BOND-STREET. M.DCC.LXXXVI. E Res The 1C р 30 46257 1.2 PREFACE. MULTUM legendum eſſe non multa, is an adage of antiquity, replete with a deep and excellent fenſe; it means that much reading implies not much knowledge; and that ſtudy leadeth not neceffarily to wiſdom: :-It teaches that to profit from our applica- cation, whilft we read one book, we fhould in thought frame another; and inſtead of being Libro- rum Helluones, afford the mind exerciſe and time wherewith to digeſt a moderate and wholeſome fare: -It inculcates, that to perufe the works of many authors, may to the language of pedantry gain the title of learning; but that attentively to penetrate the ſenſe of a few, is the way to ſcience. All men however, have not equal acutenefs to develope, equal affiduity to purſue, or equal memory to retain, the ſubject-matter of a book: fays Mon- taigne,. "I have read an hundred things in Titns "Livius, that have eſcaped the obfervations of "others, and Plutarch has read an hundred more "there, IO vi PREFACE. CC "there, befides what I was able to diſcover :". So far I agree with this fenfible writer; but when he adds, and more perhaps than Livy ever in- "ferted in his book,"-either I do not underſtand, or I must reject, or I muft refine upon the fenfe of the text; for though an antiquary or chronologiſt may take advantage of fome word, conftruction, or circumſtance, artfully or fancifully to affume the au- thenticity of an epoch, or of a relique, in favour to his own prejudices, or to fome ſyſtem, or to ſome authority to which he is partial; yet to him who reads hiſtory, not as the hiftory of dates and pagods, but of men,-it hath recondite in it, all the leffons of ethics and policy, which he can make himſelf maſter of from the perufal. Every annaliſt muſt be under the predicament of teaching more than him- felf knows, to thoſe who come after him; and who of courſe connecting his particular link of the chain as well with a fucceeding as with a foregoing feries, may juftly and logically deduce, what the author could never have furmiſed to have been deducible from his work: a ruftic makes a lever to raife, ano- ther employs it to aſcertain the weight; nor is this uſe the lefs inherent in the inftrument, whatever in ſuch reſpect may have been the ignorance of its firſt artificer. So far I premiſe, in order to obviate the objections, PREFACE. vii objections, which I forefee may be made to the following treatiſe, as too fancifully inveftigating its fubject; and as extracting often from the text of hiſ- tory, documents of philofophy and politics,-when no fuch deductions fhould be made, and no fuch lef- fons (to uſe a word of Montaigne's Tranflator) were ever inferted in my originals. Ariſtotle in his ninth chapter of Poetics, difcri- minating hiſtory and poetry, confiders not the dif- tinction as ariſing from the meaſure and harmony of verfe: "the hiftories of Herodotus (fays he) though "delivered in metre, would not conftitute a poem; hiſtory teaches what has been,-poetry what may "be; wherefore poetry is of a more philofophical “and didactic ſpirit than hiſtory :”—this opinion of Ariſtotle, that the epic mufe was a better and more comprehenfive teacher than the hiftoric, I cannot readily adopt;—I cannot but imagine that this deep thinking philofopher has in one inftance decided too haftily, or too lightly. That the poet might in an Æneas combine the mental excellencies of many, as well as the painter delineate the various beauties of many in one piece of art,—I can well conceive; and that hiftory, when it portraited an individual, was confined to a narrower ground than the canvas ſpread to the laviſh hand of fancy, I freely allow;-but hiftory viii PREFACE. hiſtory furely confifts not in the detail of any one man's life and actions; it is perverted when em- ployed in the ſervice of Cæfar, and not of Rome. National characteristic, as much, or more than pri- vate character, fhould be clearly deducible from this kind of work; and if treated with fuch view, (and with fuch view it fhould be treated) hiſtory may teem with as much philofophic theory as poetry: in the annals of an united people, we find matter for general pofitions, and the particular examples inter- ſperſed aſſiſt us in the analyfis or compofition of our fyftem; they form a ſet of rudiments to the ovvlàžis which poetry can never have fo complete; for many a pregnant circumftance may be exploded, as not being coincident with the rules of the art,-" primo afpectu levia (fays Tacitus) fed ex queis magnarum fæpe rerum motus oriuntur :"-Poetry indeed, as obferves the Stagyrite, tells us, "what may be;". but as a tutorefs of morals and of wifdom, fhe can only tell, “what may be," by collecting, combining, and modifying "what has been ;"-and this, as the following effay may ſerve to elucidate, is equally the province of hiſtory. Poetry may perhaps ſhow the fcene to a dim eye, in larger quarries, and in ftronger colours ;—to gain this advantage likewiſe over to hiſ- tory, and to paint a forcible and expreffive picture of