BT 127 A 2 134 WESTERMANNSC YORK 40 Broadwo Tappan Presbyterian Association LIBRARY. Presented by HON. D. BETHUNE DUFFIELD. From Library of Rev. Geo. Duffield, D.D. Geo Duffield 1812 DEO REIPUBLICE ET AMICIS ་ ESTO SEMPER FIDELIS. GeoDuffrite Section і Das Turn Birk Somuch es that I never saw Before this best law mave wave BT 127 .A2 D34 f Ο Just Published, Printed for C. RIVINGTON, in St. Paul's Church-yard, A NNOTATIONS On the Book of JOB, and the PSALMS. Collected from feveral Commentators, and Methodized and Im- proved; by THOMAS FENTON, M. A. Rector of Nately-Scures in Hampshire, and fometime Student of Chrift-Church in Oxford. TOFOTOFO FO REVELATION Examin'd 721 with CANDOUR. 0 203 OR, A FAIR ENQUIRY INTO THE SENSE and USE Of the Several REVELATIONS Exprefly Declared, or fufficiently Implied, To be given to Mankind from the CREATION, as they are found in the BIBLE. By a profefs'd Friend to an honeft Freedom of 3 1 } Delang Thought in Religious Enquiries. Dr Delan patrick Decoy. D.D. PART I Containing DISSERTATIONS upon the feveral Revelations from the CREATION to the FLOOD, inclufive. LONDON: Printed for C. RIVINGTON, at the Bible and Crown in St. Paul's Church-yard. M.D CC. XXXI. BT 137 .A= 고급​수 ​gist Tappan Pres. Ars 4-3-1932 TO THE KING'S MOST EXCELLENT MAJESTY. May it please your MAJESTY! T is the birthright of Your Majeſty's fubjects of theſe realms, to addrefs their So- vereign upon every exi- gency; to petition, to inform, to com- plain; and even, as far as decency will admit, or duty require, to ad- viſe. А3 IT vi DEDICATION. IT is in virtue of this right, that the following differtations, are, with all humility, prefented to Your Majefty, from an author of no name; who preſumes not, to implore any degree of favour or protection, either to himſelf, or them; the vanity or juſtice of that pretenfion, Your wiſdom, and their worth, will beft determine. YOUR Majefty is call'd, by the Divine Providence, to the protection of a free people; and conftituted by the nobleft of Your titles, defender of the faith; and as theſe are the higheſt honours, to which mortality can afpire in this world, and the preſervation of both, (in due dignity, and perfect confiftency), the nobleft privileges of power and prerogative: the fupport of fuch a conduct, will be the fureft ma- DEDICATION. vii manifeſtation of the wisdom of Your councils, and the moderation of Your government. 1 'Tis but too notorious, that a licentious fpirit is gone out into the world; invading every thing, ferious and facred, with a rude effrontery, till now unknown! fapping the very foundations of religion, and in that, the beſt foundation of vertue, with all the enfuriate violence of ignorance! and all the lawleſs rage of impotence! labouring, with every artifice of argu- ment, every ſpecious delufion of rea- fon, and every bait of ſenſual indul- gence, to feduce the foul, and pervert the will: and in conſequence of both theſe, to fubvert that righteousness which exalteth a nation; and to in- troduce that fin, which is not only the fad reproach, but the fure ruin of A 4 any viii DEDICATION. any people; and which hath never fail'd from the foundation of the earth, (when once arrived to its heighth) to draw down the fignal vengeance of God, in calamity, defolation, and deftruction. 'Tis true, theſe bold champions of irreligion, have thus far merited of mankind; they have baniſh'd hypo- crify; and, had they ftopp'd there, it were well but it is the reproach of human frailty, to run into oppofite extreams; they have baniſh'd fhame- faced hypocrify, but they have efta- bliſh'd abandon'd profaneneſs! Î AND yet, on the other hand, to take away the liberty of the preſs, and the freedom of reaſon in matters of religion, would be to deprive British liberty of a valuable birthright, and human DEDICATION. ix human reaſon of her nobleft ufe! to protect obfolete error, and to rob truth! to rob her of her beft advan- tage, and moſt diftinguiſh'd honour! the honour of fhining brighteſt upon the fevereſt trials; and the advantage, of triumphing with moft glory, after the hardieft conteſts, and moft fignal defeats of her obftinate enemies! But after all, fince the beft tem- porary bleffings, may be too dearly bought, or too foon defeated, and licentiouſneſs long unreftrain'd, may, in the end, become unruly; and ter- minate in dreadful extremities; is there a conduct, that can better become the rulers of the earth, either in point of publick wiſdom, or private intereſt, than timely to check and to reſtrain its progreſs? MIGHT X DEDICATION. MIGHT this be once number'd among the bleffings of Your Ma- jeſty's reign! might it be Your glory here, and Your eternal honour here- after, to repreſs this increafing, this enormous evil! NOR will it any way abate the merit of fo glorious an undertaking, that the way to it, is neither dark nor difficult that it may be compaſs'd, with eaſe, and without reproach; by fcorning the fcorner, after the example of God! and fhewing grace and favour to the lowly; and by an open, avow'd encouragement of learning, religion and vertue, in all orders and degrees of men: but eſpecially in the clergy; SHALL Your Majefty, know it Your higheſt obligation, and Your trueſt glory, DEDICATION. xi glory, to attend, with humility and reverence, upon the publick wor- ſhip of God, and fhall every aban- don'd miscreant revile that God with impunity! that God by whom You reign! Shall Your Majefty fee it to be Your fureft ſource of felicity, Your fureft ſtay of power, and moft indif penfible duty, to live in the avow'd practice of every conjugal, every pa- rental, every private, and every pub- lick vertue and fhall vertue be re- viled! Shall neither the veneration of the wifeft, nor the practice of the beſt, nor the power of the greatest men, give it ſanction and fecurity? TACITUS tells us, that in the degeneracy of the Roman empire, vice became fo reputable, that thoſe who reverenced vertue in their hearts, did xii DEDICATION. did not dare to profeſs the leaſt out- ward regard, for it. + O fhame to Christians! open irreli- gion, the ſure parent of every vice, and the fworn foe to every vertue, is now in the fame heighth of reputation! which is not only a furer mark of degeneracy, but (what, methinks, fhould give fome alarm to the moſt fecure libertine) is, at leaſt, as faithful an indication of approaching ruin, if God, in his unmerited mercy, pre- vent it not. EVIL rulers, have ever been able to render vice reputable; and cannot the righteous do as much for vertue ? Is vertue, (the greateſt of all earthly bleffings! the faireſt and the lovelieft of all human accompliſhments!) the only thing, which power cannot render ho- nourable ? DEDICATION. xiii this nourable? which majefty cannot mani- feſt to be lovely? nor courts, becom- ing? Can the higheſt examples only influence to evil! God forbid; were to ftrip grandeur of its nobleſt prerogative, as well as its trueft and richeſt intereſt! Let a prince hear the advice of a prince, (the wifeft of earthly rulers!) upon this head; Take away the dross from the filver, and there fhall come forth a veſſel for the finer: take away the wicked from before the king, and his throne ſhall be eſtabliſhed in righteousness. DREAD Sir! it needs little fagacity to fee, that the beft fecurity of a throne, is its beſt ornament! Without a right ſenſe of religion, fervants are fycophants; guards, keepers; and at- tendants, enemies in pay. WOULD xiv DEDICATION WOULD Your Majefty live fecure, and reign glorious; be ignorance de- fpifed, and immorality detefted! be open profaneneſs as openly diſcouraged; and lewd fcurrility upon facred fubjects, upon the higheſt intereſts of reaſonable beings, effectually repreffed! if not with all that rigour of chaſtiſement, which misguided zeal may require ; yet, at leaſt, with all that juft con- tempt and indignation, which true re- ligion muſt exact! which wiſdom re- commends, and intereft demands: And let the vertue of this conduct be yet heighten'd, by that juft efteem, and honourable diftinction, fteadily conferred upon true piety; upon piety enlarged, and enlighten'd, as it ought; enlighten'd with uſeful learning, of every kind; and enlarged into a true concern for the temporal, and eternal interefts • DEDICATION. xv and the interefts of human-kind; fincerity of fuch a difpofition, will beſt be ſeen, when it exerts itself, with all the openness of honefty, with all the patience of charity, and with all the courage of conviction, in a ſteady oppofition to error, and defence of truth. So fhall Your Majefty effectually be, what You are fo gloriouſly titled! remembring always, that it is the nobleft prerogative of a king that fitteth on the throne of judge- ment, that he scattereth away all evil with his eyes! that he is then, truly the ſubſtitute of the fupream Sovereign, when the righteous are honour'd in his prefence, and the vile contemn'd. THAT xvi DEDICATION. THAT this may ever be Your Majeſty's true character, and conftant employment; and that God may long preſerve You in it; that of his infinite goodneſs, he may crown You with lafting glory here, and endleſs felicity hereafter, is the con- ftant and fincere prayer of, YOUR MAJESTY'S, Moft dutiful and moſt devoted Subject and Servant. [ xvii ] THE PREFACE. T HE reader is defired to take notice, that the word reve- lation, is, in the following differtations, taken in a very extenfive fenfe: to fignify every inter- pofition of the Divine Providence in the government of the world, out of the ordinary established course of nature. a IT xviii The PREFACE. IT may be thought, perhaps, that I Should make fome apology to the world, for troubling them with any thing re- lating to religion; (which feemeth, at prefent, more the fubject of light con- tempt, than real concern); efpecially fuch points of it, as have fo often been treated before, and by fo many able pens; but ſo far am I from thinking I need an apology, that, I imagine, I ſhall have some degree of merit with the reader, if I can entertain him with Something new, upon fo dry a fubject: Novelty, being at preſent, in writings of all forts, (next to irreligion) the reigning merit! and novelty upon a fubject ſo obfolete, and fo feemingly ex- baufted, will, I hope, be allow'd a more than common merit. And, in- deed, the fcriptures feem to me, a field, which 3 The PREFACE. xix which hath hitherto been rendered, in fome refpects, rather barren, than fruit- ful, by culture: (tho' in itself infinitely the richest and the nobleft of all others) or, if fruitful of falutary food, to the humble, (which it yielded fufficiently without culture) yet to the proud, in no eminently better degree, than the earth under the curfe; fruitful for the moft part, in thorns and thiſtles! IT must be own'd, that much read- ing and erudition, together with im- menfe labour, have been laid out on the bible, fince the restoration of learning; and yet in reality, all this, hath hither- to amounted to little more, than clearing the way, and preparing proper mate- rials, for men of genius. The human progress to perfection, is, and ever muft a 2 be XX The PREFACE. be flow; and that which is most eagerly defired, must be laft expected. FOR my own part, I must own, that with all human vanity about me I can confider the following differta- tions, but as ſo many ſtruggles of an in- duftrious man, thro' a thicket; which Serve at first, but to let in a little glimering light; I shall not, however, cfteem my labour loft, if I have let in enough, to prepare the pupil, for a fuller admiffion of the day, from the fubfequent efforts of more refolution and strength. THE misfortune is, study and knowledge are now almost out of date: learning is remarkably in the decline; and of neceffity must decline, in propor- tion, as the prefent groveling, giddy, frivolous Spirit of infidelity, (the bane of every thing arduous and excellent) 3 pre- The PREFACE. xxi prevails; it being evident, that the only wiſdom upon the infidel's principles is this ; Let us eat and drink, for to mor- row we die. HENCE the true caufe of the growth of luxury among us, as among the Ro- mans, in the decline of the common- wealth, upon the Spreading of Epicu- rus's principles. Luxury, toge- ther with other vices, begets floth; floth, ignorance; and ignorance in a vitiated mind, is the fure parent of in- fidelity. And as there are fabions in opinions, as in other things, infidelity is now among the reigning vanities of life! but the vanities of this life, paſs away! and fleet faft into their oppofite extreams. Infidelity is now pre- dominant; but, perhaps, the juftest fear a 3 juſteſt upon xxii The PREFACE. upon this head, is, that fuperftition will foon fucceed it. ; STRANGE paradox! the true parent of infidelity, is ignorance; and yet it's vaunted origine, is the pride of know- ledge! but with this disadvantage that it is only knowledge of evil. For all knowledge of good, all true and va- luable learning in the world, is indif putably on the fide of revelation. It is a melancholly reflection ! the pre- fent pride of infidelity is knowledge! but it's only plea at the laft, will be ignorance. IT must indeed be own'd, that the modern patrons of infidelity, bave fome learning; Engliſh tranſlations, and Engliſh divines, are familiar to them ; but the misfortune is, that they fix, not The PREFA c E. xxiii not upon their excellencies, but their errors; and fo error is made the test of truth. Ir bath often been obferved by the wiſeſt men, that nothing is fo dangerous in any fcience, as a little learning: a little light, from the false or imperfect view it gives of the noblest objects, is apt to inſpire contempt, from ignorance; and vanity, from comtempt: when a fuller gleam, exhibiting perfection and excellence in a true light, and a fairer proportion, infpireth admiration, and confufion of face; admiration, from ex- cellence; and confufion, from the remem- brance of past arrogance. A flender portion of knowledge, fhews only our acquifitions, which make us vain; a larger, difplays our wants, and makes us bumble. a 4 IT xxiv The PREFACE. IT is the obfervation, of that great honour of England, and of human na- ture, the Lord BACON ; that a little learning inclineth mens mens minds to Atheiſm, but depth in it brings them about again to religion. What is true of Science in general, is more remarkably fo, in relation to divinity; where, as there is more room for true wisdom, there is more range for folly. Tho' the truth is, it is hard to fay which is moft ruinous in this point, flender knowledge, or downright ignorance; the infidel world, (if you except fome few men of genius, burried away by vanity, ambition, imagination, and fenfual purſuits) being, for the most part, divided but into two claffes: men of little learning, and men of none. Their acquifitions are un- equal 3 The PREFACE. XXV equal; but their capacity and conceit the fame. How lamentable a prospect is human vanity, in this view! a man, whose conceit fets him above fubmitting to plain truths, and reaſonable evidence, is in a defperate way! the fame pride, which fhuts his eyes upon the clearest points, but too often determines him upon the darkest. Conducted thus, by vanity, and ignorance, whilst the blind, leads the blind, it is impoffible, but that he muft fall into the pit. Happy, if his fall convinces him of his folly, before it concludes in his ruin! THAT men should rejoice in that light, which it hath pleafed God to diffuſe upon the human foul, is but right, and reasonable; but that men Should xxvi The PREFACE. Should reject that glorious light, which came down from heaven, to be led wholly by their own, is just as wise, as it would be, to prefer a glimmering taper, to the fun in his glory! is in truth, to prefer comparative darkness! a conduct, which can only be ascribed to weak eyes, or a wicked heart. Men love darkneſs better than light, becauſe their deeds are evil! and yet, tho' the prefent condition of the world, is, in truth, a melancholly prospect in the eye of true piety, (for what can be more melancholly, than to fee wisdom infulted by folly! and reasonable beings play with perdition!) yet I can't help thinking, that it is a prospect, which Sometimes fhews itself to the most feri- ous eye, in a ludicrous light; who, that beholds the prefent mad infults of irreligion, can fometimes forbear ima- gining The PREFACE. xxvii gining to himſelf, the mock-triumph of Caligula, for the ſpoils of the ocean ? Men glory in their shame, becauſe they see it not ; and nothing but more light, can bring them to their Senfes. If what is here endeavoured, ſhall be deem'd fufficient, to humble this Shameful infolence of infidelity, and to take away all pretence to triumph, from imagin'd abfurdity, or incon- fiftency, in the most exceptionable parts of revelation, my end is anfwer'd: That enough is done to this pur- poſe, I ſhall not ſcruple to pronounce ; at least, if I have any idea of truth, or evidence. And methinks there is no mighty vanity, in any man's ima- gining that he hath; inasmuch as it requires no vaft talents, beyond common Sense, xxviii The PREFACE. fenfe, in any man converfant in rational difquifitions, to distinguish plain truth from manifeft falfhood, by their common and known marks and characters. In truth, there is no more vanity in. this, than in imagining that he can diftinguish light from darkness, or men from monsters! and if there is not, I will take upon me to say, that whatever I have offered for evidence in the following treatife, is fuch. That the neceffity of revelation, the truth of the Mofaic history, and the abfurdity of the objections made to it, are, in many inftances, as clearly proved, in the following differtations, as any theorem in Euclid; by axioms, as evident, by propofitions, as plain, and by deductions, as clear; confe- quently, that infidelity here (after a fair The PREFACE. xxix fair examination of the points fo dif- cufs'd) is as irrational, as diffent, there. But if any man imagines other- wife, and shall think fit to arraign my reafonings, of fallacy or falfhood, his wifeft way, if he intends nothing but his own conviction, and the triumph of truth, will be, to try his fagacity, in detecting, and his ftrength, in con- futing them which I thus publickly and earnestly entreat and exhort all Such to do; and which, if they attempt to do, by any other method, than that of fair reafoning, I defire them before-band to take notice, that, as I shall make no other return than the contempt of filence, fo every candid man must confider fuch proceeding, in them, as a confefs'd defeat. ; I SPEAK XXX The PREFACE. I SPEAK this, in the spirit of a man, who speaks from conviction; and hath no other intereft but that of truth : which feareth not to be brought to the test of reason, and which is often, not more promoted, by the best arguments of it's advocates, than by the determin'd oppofition of it's enemies, the enemies of every thing ver tuous and valuable in this world! for after all; whatever specious pre- tences the prefent oppofitions to religion may carry with them, they are in effect, but the dispute * revived. young men of Darius's And bow- ever the cause of wine and women * Efdras iii. (the The PREFACE. xxxi (the vanities and pleafures of life) may prevail for a ſeaſon, must end, as that did, in favour of truth. Truth en- dureth, and is always ftrong; it liveth, and conquereth, for ever more. REVE [1] REVELATION EXAMINED, &c. DISSERTATION I. Of the forbidden Fruit. SHALL begin with the firft reve- lation given to Adam in paradife, as you will find it in the fecond chapter of Genefis, at the 16th and 17th verfes 16. AND the Lord God commanded the man, Saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayeft freely eat. B 17. Bur 2 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 17. BUT of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil thou shalt not eat of it; for in the day that thou eatest thereof, thou shalt Surely die. NOTHING Could be more agreeable to the wifdom and goodne fs of God, than to pro- vide plenty of proper food for all the crea- tures he had formed; but as theſe creatures were of very various natures, and confe- quently what was proper food for one, might be very improper food for another, Adam muft, in this cafe, be under great difficulties, without fome direction from God: for fup- poſing that he had a right to make uſe of any food that came in his way, without an exprefs grant from his Maker, (as I think it evident he had not) it would, however, be irrational in him, to run the rifque of taking any food, which might not only be impro- per, but pernicious to him; and, without fome direction from God, it was impoffible for him to know what food was proper, otherwife than by examining the nature of his own conftitution, and the nature of the feveral fruits before him, and the fuitable- nefs of each to the other; and how this could be done in that ftate is utterly incon- ceiveable, otherwife than by experiment; and the experiment might have been as fatal to him, as it hath fince been to many of his pofterity; REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 3 pofterity; great numbers of whom have been deftroyed, by fruits apparently fair and inviting. And therefore, as the wifdom and goodneſs of God were engaged in the prefervation of his own creature (for other- wife the very first object he met, might have defeated all the ends of his creation) the fame attributes neceffarily required that he fhould be informed how to preferve his being, and caution'd how he might impair or deſtroy it. IF you fuppofe his fenfes were fo perfect, that he could, by their affiftance alone, cer- tainly diftinguish what food was falutary, and what noxious, you muſt at the fame time ſuppoſe him formed in much more per- fection than any of his pofterity; and if that is allow'd, the truth of revelation is fo far eſtabliſh'd; and if it is not allow'd, 'tis a demonftration that revelation in this cafe was neceffary; neceffary, as the wiſdom and the goodneſs of God: Let the adverfaries of reveal'd religion chufe which part of this dilemma they like beft. Now as reafon fhews, that this grant and this revelation were, as far as we can con- ceive, neceffary, fcripture affures us that they were made; for we are told in the firft chapter of Genefis, that when Adam was created, God gave him a right to every herb and B 2 4 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. and tree upon the face of the earth; and when he tranflated him into paradiſe, we are affured, that he gave him free permiffion to eat the fruit of every tree in the garden, except one; and that he added the reafon of that reſtraint, becauſe the eating the fruit of that tree would be pernicious to him; for in the day thou eatest thereof thou shalt furely die; or, as it is in the original, dying thou shalt die; i. e. you fhall certainly con- tract a mortal infirmity: now, forafmuch as a man who hath a mortal infirmity upon him, is, in truth, in a dying condition, he from that moment be ftrictly and pro- perly faid to be dying. Whereas then, as I have obſerved to you, reafon demonſtrates that this revelation was neceffary, and fcrip- ture fhews it to be made; here is a new argument of the truth of fcripture; for what can be a clearer demonftration of the truth of any writing, than demonftrating it to be perfectly conformable to the neceſſary truth and nature of things? may If it be ask'd, why Adam was not fuper- naturally endow'd with the knowledge of food as well as of animals? -I anſwer, that for ought we know fo he was this hiſtory is very ſhort, poffibly he was fully informed of all plants and fruits, but certainly he was of that on which his own well-being, and that of his pofterity, depended. BUT REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 5 BUT here we are asked by infidels, with high infults upon our credulity and igno- rance, how it was poffible that eating the fruit of a tree could deftroy the ſuppoſed perfection of Adam's nature? make him blind, and vitious, and miferable; and what is more abfurd than all this, entail guilt and mifery upon his lateft pofterity? In anſwer to this, I cannot but own, that thefe difficulties have perplex'd the ableft heads of all ages; fince the curiofity and vanity of men have urged them more to canvas the ways of infinite wiſdom with arrogance, than to fubmit to them with humility; and yet more enlarged obſerva- tions upon the laws of God in the govern- ment of the world, added to fome late dif coveries in the knowledge of nature, will, I hope, enable us to give all thefe difficulties fuch clear and rational folutions, as may be fufficient to fubdue any unreaſonablenefs, leſs than that of infidelity, to the end of the world. I NEED not be at much pains to inform the reader, that the fin of our firſt parents confifted in their indulging an irregular ap- petite, in order to obtain a higher degree of knowledge, contrary to the exprefs com- mand of God. Now I ask, Is it any way incon- B 3 6 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. inconfiftent with the divine wifdom and goodneſs, to punish this abufe of reafon, by impairing the powers of that very faculty they had fo wantonly abuſed? or to puniſh the indulgence of irregular appetites in our firſt parents, by giving them up to irregular appetites for the reft of their lives? and in this cafe, 'tis evident, they would naturally become vitious, and miferable, and involve their pofterity in the neceffary confequences of their own guilt and folly. WE fee it now an eſtabliſhment of God in the nature and conftitution of things, that all irregular indulgence of our appetites is attended with evil; and that every fuch in- dulgence makes thofe appetites yet more irregular. We alfo fee it eftablifh'd in the nature of things, that all vain and un- reaſonable purſuits of fuperior wiſdom, all pride of knowledge, naturally tend to im- pair the powers of the mind, by taking off the thoughts from their proper objects, and by giving them falfe and fantaſtic views; and in confequence of this, feldom fail to end, either in downright madneſs, or fpeci- ous folly. Now, why in the appointment of God, the fearch of forbidden knowledge, by an irregular indulgence in forbidden fruit, fhould not have any or all theſe effects, tho' out of the ordinary courſe, or prefent flate of things, I believe all the deifts in REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 7 in the world will find it hard to explain; unleſs they think it impoffible that any other than the prefent eſtabliſhment could ever have fubfifted: or if there could, unleſs they think it reaſonable, that God Almighty fhould ſuſpend his laws, and over-rule his own eſtabliſh'd order of nature, in favour of Adam and Eve, who were, at leaſt in this point, the most unpardonable delinquents that ever were in the world. BUT if it be faid, that tranfgreffing the Commandment of God in this inftance, is puniſh'd with more than the ordinary pe- nalty of indulging an irregular appetite; I anfwer, that allowing it to be fo, the penalty of the firft tranfgreffion, ſhould in wiſdom and in juftice, be greater than that of any fubfequent tranfgreffion; becauſe all depended upon the firft; as alfo to deter all pofterity, and to let them fee, by this exam- ple, that whatever penalty God denounces againſt guilt, will infallibly be executed. BUT this point will be yet more fully cleared, upon the principles of natural know- ledge; (even without fuppofing any efta- bliſhment different from the preſent, except- ing that man was then in the perfection in which it beft became infinite wifdom and goodneſs to create him.) B 4 WE 8 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. We know there are feveral fruits in feveral parts of the world, of fo noxious a nature, as to deſtroy the beft human conftitution upon earth. We alſo know very well, that there are fome fruits in the world which in- flame the blood into fevers and phrenzies. And we are told, that the Indians are ac- quainted with a certain juice, which imme- diately turns the perfon who drinks it into an idiot; leaving him at the fame time in the enjoyment of his health, and all the powers of his body; Now I ask, whe- ther it is not poffible, nay, whether it is not rational to believe, that the fame fruit, which, in the prefent infirmity of nature, would utterly deftroy the human conftitu- tion, might, in the higheſt perfection we can imagine it, at leaſt diſturb, and impair, and diſeaſe it? and whether the fame fruit which would now inflame any man living into a fever or phrenzy, might not inflame Adaminto a turbulence and irregularity of paſſion and appetite? and whether the fame fluids which in- flame the blood into irregularity of paffion and appetite, may not naturally produce infec- tion, and impair the conftitution? alfo, whe- ther the fame juice, which now fo affects the brain of an ordinary man, as to make him an idiot, might not fo affect the brain of Adam, as to bring his underſtanding down to the prefent ftandard of ordinary men? and if REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 9 if this be poffible, and not abfurd to be fup- pofed, 'tis evident the fubfequent ignorance and corruption of human nature may clearly be accounted for upon thefe fuppofitions; nay, I had almoft faid upon any one of them? for the perfection of human nature confifting in the dominion of reafon over the paffions and appetites, whatever deftroy'd the abfoluteneſs of that dominion, whether by inflaming the paffions, or impairing the powers of reaſon, muft of neceffity deſtroy the perfection of human nature; and, in con- fequence of that, produce fin, guilt, and mifery in Adam; and entail it upon his pofterity. The ALL mankind were in Adam. knowledge of nature proves this to be true. And we well know that the infections and infirmities of the father, affect the children yet in his loins; and if the mother be equal- ly infected, muft, unless removed by proper remedies, affect their pofterity to the end of the world: or, at leaft, till the infection extinguiſhes the race affected with it. There- fore, why all mankind might not by their firft father's fin be reduced to the fame con- dition of infirmity and corruption with him- felf, (eſpecially when the mother was equal- ly infirm and infected) I believe no man, any way skill'd in the knowledge of nature, will fo much as pretend to fay. And if it 10 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. it is not abfurd and irrational to ſuppoſe, that this might be done, certainly it can neither be abfurd or irrational to believe that it was done eſpecially when we believe it, upon the credit of the wifeft, the moſt au- thentic, the beft attefted hiſtory in the whole world, except that of the gofpels; a hiftory confirmed by the oldeft, the moſt credible, and the moſt authentic traditions of all anti- quity; and what is yet more, confirmed be- yond all reaſonable doubt, by the very rea- fon, and nature, and truth of things: and in the prefent cafe, confirmed beyond all poffibility of doubt, by the teftimony of all ages, and by the experience of every man living upon the face of the earth; fhall be fhewn hereafter. as DIS- REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 11 DISSERTATION II. Concerning the knowledge of the brute world conveyed to Adam. A NOTHER revelation neceſſary to Adam in the ſtate of innocence, was the nature of the feveral JUK creatures formed for his uſe. And another, to be affured that God had given him dominion over them. First, IT was neceffary for him to know the nature of the feveral creatures made for his uſe, otherwife 'tis impoffible he could ufe them to any good or reaſonable purpoſe; and 'tis a neceffary confequence from the wifdom and goodnefs of God, that when he beſtows any right upon any of his crea- tures, he ſhould endow them with the means of enjoying it; and 'tis evident, that if Adam was created under all the prefent in- firmities 12 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. firmities and neceffities of human nature, he muſt be miſerable for a long courfe of years; nay, probably he might perifh, before he could find out by his own fagacity the fit- nefs of the feveral creatures, to fupply the feveral neceffities and conveniences of human life; or, having found it, to be able, by the force of his own ftrength and wifdom, with no other than the affiftance of his wife, to fubdue and apply thofe creatures to the feveral ends and ufes for which they were ordained by God. At leaſt it hath coft his pofterity much pains to this purpoſe, tho' affifted by numbers, and advantaged by all the inventions of art. It hath exhauſted the wiſdom of many fucceffive generations, to arrive at a through improvement and infor- mation in thefe points; and yet no man of common learning believes them to be fully attain'd to this day. And is it any way agreeable to the ideas we have of the divine beneficence, to believe, he would leave his innocent creatures, fo long deftitute of fo many comforts and conveniences of life, or fuffer them to pine and periſh for want of them? Mortals, ill inform'd of the benignity and perfection of the divine Being, may give up their belief to fuch abfurdities; but, God be praiſed, Chriftians know better things. THE fum of the argument is this; if Adam was created under the prefent infirmities and neceffities REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 13 neceffities of human nature, he muft have been long miferable, perhaps to the laft moment of his life, without the knowledge of the nature and ufes of the feveral crea- tures. 'Tis inconfiftent with the juftice and goodneſs of God, to fuffer him to be miferable, or perifh innocent; and therefore 'tis a neceffary confequence from the wiſdom and goodneſs of God, that he was inform'd of theſe points as foon as it was neceſſary, i. e. as foon as he was created. And to this end, 'tis evident, that either God muft have endowed him with fuch exceeding fagacity and penetration as to difcern the natures of all animals at firft fight, and then Mofes's account of this matter is literally true. Or elfe, he muſt convey this know- ledge to him by an exprefs revelation. Let the adverfaries of reveal'd religion alfo take which fide of this dilemma they like beft. THE next revelation neceffary to Adam at this time, was, that God had given him dominion over the creatures; for to what purpoſe would it have been to him, to have known the natures of the feveral beings about him, and their fitnefs to minifter to his fatisfactions, and to ferve the neceffities and conveniences of his life, if he could not be affured at the fame time that he had a right to apply them to thofe ends? and 'tis certain that fitneſs could not infer right, i. e. the 14 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. the fitneſs in one creature to ferve the ends of another, infers no right in that other to apply that creature to his own ufes; and all the cafuifts upon earth will never be able to demonftrate, that he had a right fo much as to the milk of a cow, without an exprefs grant from God. It was abfolutely ne- ceffary therefore that God Almighty ſhould give him a right to the creatures; and not only fo, but fhould give him dominion over them fuch a dominion as fhould imply awe and fubmiffion in them, and authority and rule in him; otherwife 'tis impoffible to ſay, why the firſt lion or tyger that met him, ſhould not at the fame time devour him; or the firſt cow, or horfe, or elephant he at- tempted to tame, fhould not gore, or tram- ple, or tear him to pieces. I BESEECH you to confider, what muſt the condition of a man fent into the world in the midſt of ſo many favage creatures, prone and enabled to deftroy him, if thofe crea- tures were not at the fame time reſtrained ; 'tis evident, that without this, he muſt be miferable beyond imagination; and that no man of common ſenſe would take life upon thofe terms, even now, with all the advan- tage of arts and arms; to be the only man upon the globe, encompaffed with brutes and favages, ready and able to devour and deſtroy him. And much lefs would he accept REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 15 accept of life upon the terms of being placed naked and defencelefs in thoſe circumſtances. And 'tis as evident, that what a man of common ſenſe would not take, a being of infinite goodneſs would not give to a rea- ſonable creature, upon thofe terms. — And therefore, as certain as it can be, that God is infinitely wife and good, fo certain is it, that when he fent man into the world, naked and defencelefs, he placed him in it in full affurance of fecurity from the crea- tures, and dominion over them. And con- fequently Mofes's account of this matter, in the first chapter of Genefis, is demonftrably true; where he tells us, that as foon as God had declared his refolution to make man in his own image, he decreed them dominion over all the other creatures. And accordingly we are affured, that as foon as Adam and Eve were created, God bleſſed them; and God faid unto them, Be fruitful and multiply, and replenish the earth, and fubdue it, and have dominion over the fiſh of the fea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth. And as nothing could fo fully fatisfy Adam, that he was in full poffeffion of this dominion, as bringing the creatures before him, and letting him fee his own authority, and their fubmiffion, (which he could not but fee by their behaviour on that occafion) we are affured from the fcriptures that they were 16 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. were brought before him; and that he gave them names, which the knowledge of the Hebrew fhews us to be fignificant of their natures; from whence we infer, that God gave him alfo a clear infight into their feveral characters, and qualities, and uſes, as far as was neceffary to his well-being; and that fuch knowledge was neceffary to his well- being, I have already fhewn. BUT here it may be objected, that if Adam and Eve were fo throughly inform'd in the nature of the creatures, how was it poffible that the ferpent could deceive beings of fuch fuperior abilities? In answer to this, I fhall omit the various. opinions of Doctors and Rabbi's on this head, and barely mention that which is moſt na- tural and obvious from the fcripture. EVE very well knew that the ferpent, tho' fubtil, was yet denied the uſe of reaſon and fpeech; and therefore, when fhe faw him endow'd with both, and heard him attribute theſe perfections to the vertue of the forbidden fruit, it was eafy for her to conclude thus with herfelf, that if the ver- tue of that fruit was fo wonderful, as to make the ferpent rational from brute, 'twas probable enough it might raiſe her from ra- tional to divine; and this was fuch a temp- tation REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 17 tation as reafon could not eafily refift, as fhall be fhewn hereafter. 'Tis true, this matter is related ſhortly, and, to our preſent capacities, fomewhat obfcurely in the fcrip- ture; but, if we confider, that the human underſtanding was much more perfect before the fall; and that in this perfection it was eafy to learn the ſpeaker's thoughts from a fhort hint, without the toil of thofe long and laborious deductions, which our prefent dul- neſs hath made neceffary; we fhall find that the ferpent had no need to ſpeak one word more than he is faid to do on this occafion. Nay, if he had fpoken more, he might have defeated his defign; by letting Eve fee that he had not attain'd to all that fagacity he pretended to, by eating the forbidden fruit. In fhort, this conference is a ſpecimen of that ſhort fagacious reafoning, which human nature was capable of in its perfection. And as I am fully fatisfied that the ferpent had no need of faying one word more to Eve on this occafion, than is here recorded; fo I think it evident, that Mofes, in relating no more than what was faid, hath diſcharged the part of a faithful hiftorian; which he would not have done, had he related one word more. AND, in order to clear this, I fhall again repeat this pofition; that the perfection of our underſtanding in this world is knowledge C by 18 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. i by hints, or fimple propofitions; as the perfection of our underſtanding in the next, will be knowledge by intuition. And who- ever is any-way converfant in hiftory, or hath converfed with any fagacity himself, cannot but know, that nothing is more com- mon than to difcern a whole train of thoughts by one word, nay, by a look, figh, or even a motion of the head or hand. a And what hath fo much diftinguiſhed the abilities of Sir Ifaac Newton, and fome other great genius's to the world, as their perception of very new and remote truths, from very fimple principles, which others, even when diſcovered, could not attain, without a long train of confequences; at leaft, what could raiſe their abilities fo high in our esteem, as to be fatisfied they were capable of fuch perception? And this being granted, 'tis evident that the rea- foning I have mentioned on this head, is clearly deducible from the converfation be- tween the ferpent and the woman, men- tioned on this occafion; as you may read in the third chapter of Genefis: eſpecially when we confider the clear connection between this converſation and the precedent command of abftinence given by God, which made an ampler account of this matter lefs neceffary; the words are as follow; And he faid unto the woman, Yea, hath God faid, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden? Or rather, REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 19 ye rather, as it is in the original, Yea, because God hath faid, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden? And the woman faid unto the ferpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden; but of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath faid, Ye shall not eat of it, neither fhall And the Serpent touch it, left ye die. faid unto the woman, Ye fhall not furely die; because God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes fhall be opened, and ye fhall be as gods, knowing good and evil. And when the woman faw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleaſant to the eyes, and a tree to be defired to make one wife, She took of the fruit thereof, and did eat. Now whoever attends carefully to thefe words, will find thefe three points clearly contain'd in them: First, THAT the ferpent had fome way or other invited Eve to eat of that fruit, probably by expreffing great rapture and tranfport upon tafting it himſelf, and that notwithſtanding the refufed fo much as to touch it; and fignified the reafon of her refuſal, becauſe it was forbidden under pain of death. Secondly, THAT he ridicules that reaſon, and affigns another reaſon. C 2 AND 20 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. AND Thirdly, that fhe is confirmed in the truth of that other reafon, from the ferpent's experiment, and fo eats the fruit. First, IT appears that the ferpent had fome way or other invited Eve to eat of that fruit, and that notwithſtanding ſhe refuſed fo much as to touch it. All this is plainly implied in the ferpent's firſt queſtion; Yea, because God hath faid, Ye shall not eat of every tree in the garden? Now this queftion plainly implies a reproach upon a refufal; and fuch a reproach plainly implies an application made and rejected. For what can be clearer than that the meaning of theſe words is plainly this? What, you refuſe to eat of this tree, becauſe God hath not allow'd you to eat the fruit of the trees in the garden. Now, that this is the meaning of the ferpent's words, is evi- dent from Eve's reply, wherein the corrects the reafon affign'd by the ferpent, and affigns the true reafon of her refufal. For this reply evidently implies theſe four things. Firft, THAT application had been made to her to eat that fruit. Secondly, THAT fhe refufed fo much as to touch it, and affigned the reaſon of that refu- fal; becauſe God had forbidden it. Thirdly, i REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 21 Thirdly, THAT the ferpent pretended to miftake that reafon. AND fourthly, That ſhe corrects his pre- tended miſtake, and affigns the true reafon of her refufal; and all thefe inferences are founded upon this plain axiom. A reply correcting the wrong reason of a refufal affigned by the adverfary, and affigning the right,— implies thefe four things. That an application was made. Ift, 2dly, That 3dly, it was rejected for a certain reafon. That this reafon was affectedly or ignorantly miftaken by the adverfary. And 4thly, That this mistake was corrected in the reply, and the true reafon affigned. AND forafmuch as there is a plain infinua- tion againſt the goodneſs of God, in the fer- pent's queftion; as if God had made fome- thing which was not good; or, at leaſt, had withheld fomething that was good, nay, which was the beft of all the good things he had made, from them, and confequently was not fo bountiful and beneficent, as they might think him; fhe in her anfwer vindicates the goodneſs of God; and adds the reafon of his forbidding them that fruit, viz. left ye die, i. e. becauſe it would certainly be deftructive to them; fhe knew very well C. 3 that 22 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. that the fruit might be good, and anſwer many excellent ends of providence, and yet be deſtructive to them. Now that apprehen- fion the tempter ridicules, by affirming, in an infolent irony, and in the direct contradiction of God's own words, Ye shall not furely die; and then adds what he would infinuate to be the true reaſon of God's prohibition, because God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof your eyes fhall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil, that was the reafon that God forbid you to eat it. Now the difficulty here, is, how the tempter could take upon him to pronounce this fo peremptorily, or why Eve fhould believe him when he did? THE anfwer to this is obvious. Eve faw him eat the fruit, as I fhall fhew you imme- diately; and that he cat it to his great ad- vantage, and not to his deftruction; and therefore it was probable fhe might do fo too. Now upon fuppofition that Eve faw him eat it, without any ill confequence, the queftion which would then naturally ariſe in her mind, was this; If this fruit is not deftructive to life, as 'tis plain from the ferpent that it is not, why did God forbid us to eat it? To this doubt, which it was eafy REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 23 eafy for the ferpent to foreſee would arife in her mind, and to obferve by her countenance that it had arifen there, he gives a plain and plaufible anſwer; Becaufe, fays he, (for fo the word is in the Hebrew; because) God doth know, that in the day ye eat thereof your eyes ſhall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil. As if he had faid, You are at a lofs to know, if this tree is not deftructive, why God hath forbid you to eat it. The anfwer is plain; he forbad you, becauſe he knew that your eating it would raiſe you up to the perfections of his own nature. Now that Eve was confirmed in the truth of this reafon by the ferpent's experiment, appears plainly from the words immediately following, which are thefe, And when the woman faw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wiſe, ſhe took of the fruit thereof, and did eat. from thefe words I clearly conclude, that Eve faw the ferpent eat the forbidden fruit, and afcribed his ſpeech and knowledge to the eating of it; and this conclufion I found upon this plain axiom. Now WHOEVER declares a certain knowledge of a truth which can only be had by experiment, declares a certain knowledge that that experi- C 4 ment 24 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. ment was made. Now Eve could plainly know from her fenfes, that the fruit was defirable to the eye, but it was impoffible fhe could know that it was good for food, but from the example and experiment of the ferpent. It was alfo impoffible fhe could know that it was defirable to make wife, but by the example of the ferpent; whom fhe faw from a brute become a rational and vocal creature, as fhe thought by eating that fruit. The text fays, fhe faw it was good for food, and that it was defirable to make wife. And feeing, does not imply conjecture or belief, but certain knowledge, know- ledge founded upon evidence and proof; fuch proof as ſhe had then before her eyes. And when once we are fure that fhe had this proof, as 'tis evident fhe had, the whole conference between her and the fer- pent is as rational and intelligible, as any thing in the whole fcriptures. BUT here it is objected, that Eve expreffes no fuch thing as fear or furprize on fo ſtrange an event, as that of a brute's ſpeaking to her, which naturally fhould happen; and confe- quently this relation is incredible on that account. IN anſwer to this, I befeech theſe objectors ſeriouſly to reflect, whether human nature is now in fuch native perfection, as to be able to REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 25 ! J to anſwer and attain the true ends of fuch a being as man is; that it is not now in fuch perfection, needs little fagacity to fee, or in- genuity to own; that it was fo in its origi- nal formation, no way misbecomes the beſt philofophy to believe; forafmuch as it is apparently a neceffary confequence from the infinite wiſdom and goodneſs of God. Now 'tis evident, that, in fuch a ftate, reafon muft enjoy a calm dominion; and confequently, that there was no room for thoſe fudden ftarts of imagination, or thofe fudden tumults, agitations, failures, and ftagnations of the blood and fpirits, now incident to human nature; and therefore Eve was incapable of fear or furprize from fuch accidents as would difquiet the beft of her pofterity. This objection then is fo far from prejudicing the truth of the Mofaic hiftory, that, to me, I own, 'tis a ftrong prefumption in its favour. BUT after all, if this objection has yet any weight with my reader, I befeech him to confider what there is in this philofophic ferenity of our firft parent, (fuppofing the whole of her conduct on this occafion fully related to us) fo far exceeding the ferenity of Fabricius, upon the fudden appearance and cry of the elephant contrived by Pyrrhus to difcompofe him; or the fteddinefs of Brutus upon the appearance of his evil genius ? and 26 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. and yet, I believe, Plutarch no way fuffers in his credit, as an hiftorian, by the relation of thofe events; at leaſt, had he related thoſe furprizing accidents, without faying one word of what effects they had upon the paffions of the perfons concern'd, his rela- tions had certainly been liable to no impu- tation of incredibility, or even improbability upon that account. Now let the wifeft of mankind imagine himſelf in Eve's condition, I would ask fuch a one, If a brute fhould accoft him with the fame power of fpeech, and ftrength of rea- fon, and fhould afcribe both to the fame caufe that the ſerpent did, whether fo power- ful a temptation would not, in all probabi- lity, influence him to the fame tranfgreffion? If then, there be nothing abfurd, or impof- fible, or unphiloſophical, in ſuppoſing that the organs of a brute could be fo acted by the influence of a fuperior intelligence, as there evidently is not; then is there plainly nothing abfurd, impoffible, or incredible in this whole account of the conference be- tween Eve and the ferpent; nay, fo far otherwiſe, that, as it is now explain'd, I will be bold to fay, 'tis the moſt rational ſcheme of deception, and the beſt fitted to work its end, that the fubtileft of all created fpirits can be conceived capable of deviſing on the occafion; nay more, that the whole REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 27 whole of this account is incomparably more agreeable to reafon and philoſophy, and, confequently, more credible, than any one article of the Freethinker's faith, as it is contradiftinguiſh'd from the Chriftians. DIS 28 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. DISSERTATION III. Of the knowledge of marriage given to Adam. Proceed now to confider another revelation neceſſary to Adam in a ftate of innocence; and that was a revelation of marriage ac- cording to the law of nature; or, in other words, that God had ordained, that one man ſhould be infeparably united to one woman. Now that this knowledge was neceffary to Adam, I believe the adverfaries of revelation will not deny; when they confider, that this in- feparable union of one man with one woman in marriage, is a law of nature, as I fhall here- after prove it to be; and they themſelves own that the knowledge of the law of nature is ne- ceffary, in order to a due diſcharge of duty. Now that Adam knew this to be fuch, is evi- dent REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 29 dent from theſe words in the fecond chapter of Genefis, pronounced by him at the inftant that God gave the woman unto him, v. 23. And Adam ſaid, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh; fhe fhall be called Wo- man, becauſe ſhe was taken out of man. 24. Therefore fhall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife, and they shall be one flesh. THAT Adam fhould have a perfect idea of father and mother, before there was any fuch thing as a father or a mother in the world, ---ſhould have clear ideas of the affection and endearment arifing from that relation, and yet fhould fee clearly that the affection and en- dearment arifing from marriage fhould yet get the better of theſe ties, fo as to attach a man nearer to a ſtranger taken to his breaft, than to thoſe very parents whofe blood ran in his veins, and who gave him his very life; is a problem which will puzzle all the infidels of the world to explain in a natural way; or to account for from any fuppofition of fagaci- ty or penetration in the human mind, or from any principle whatſoever but exprefs revelation; at leaft if the received doctrines of philofophy be true, that the fenſes are the inlets of ideas, and that we can have no ideas without objects; that the mind, tho' it can compare and combine, yet cannot create ideas of any kind; nor form any, but from the per- ceptions 30 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. ceptions of its own operations, and the ob- jects of fenfe. Now ideas of parents and chil- dren, and the relation arifing from thence, when there was no fuch thing as parents or children in the world, were to Adam plainly ideas without objects; ideas of parental af- fection in a man who never had been a parent, nor ever feen the effects of that affection in another; ideas alſo of filial affection in one who never had been a fon, of contending with that affection, of conquering it, and preferring another to it, are perceptions which it was impoffible Adam could naturally have, from perceiving the operations of his own mind; becauſe it is impoffible his mind could natu- rally operate in that manner; and therefore, fince it is plain that he had theſe ideas, and had them not from nature, 'tis evident he muſt have them from revelation. AGAIN, How was it poffible for Adam to know, that God Almighty intended that the union of man and wife fhould be perpetual, fhould be as lafting and infeparable as the union of parts in the fame body, which no- thing but death or deftruction can feparate? for ſo theſe words plainly fignify, and they fhall be one flesh. He knew indeed that Eve and he were literally one flesh; but he knew at the fame time, that fucceeding pairs fhould not be fo; that REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 31 A 3 that wives were to be provided for all other men in a natural way; this is evident from theſe words, Therefore fhall a man leave his father and his mother, and ſhall cleave to his wife; and yet how he fhould take upon him to affirm, that their union with their husbands fhould be as infeparable, by the appointment of God, in the nature of things, as if they were actually one flefh, is impoffible to be accounted for in a natural way. We all know that property was eſtabliſhed in the world as a fence againſt the corruption of human nature, and therefore it is rational to believe, that in a ſtate of innocence there would have been a community of all the common conveniencies and neceffaries of life: nor could reaſon antecedently demonftrate a ne- ceffity of eſtabliſhing a ſtrict invariable pro- perty in this inftance above any other; efpe- cially when the ends of fociety might in ma- ny caſes be ſeemingly beter anfwered, by an allowance of more liberty in this point; as in the cafe of accidental barrennels from too great a difference of temperament in the mar- ried pair, or any accidental defect hap- pening after marriage in either party.---Now the ends of marriage would in appearance be better anſwered, by leaving either or both parties at liberty in thefe cafes to make ano- ther choice; eſpecially at a time when the perfection of human reafon, and rectitude of the 32 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. : the will, precluded all danger of that liberty's being abufed. And therefore 'tis evident, that Adam could not know that God Al- mighty had thus ordained, otherwife than by an expreſs revelation. It was impoffible for him to know, without revelation, in what proportion his offspring of each ſex would be propagated or that the number of each fhould for ever bear a certain determinate pro- portion to one another, as it certainly does; and, that that proportion would demonftrate the juſtice and the neceffity of one man's be- ing allowed a property in no more than one woman; and that infinite evils would accrue to mankind in their fallen condition, as it is evident there would, from eftablishing this property only for a limited time; or making the continuance of it arbitrary, or determin- ble at the difcretion of either or both parties; and fince it was abfolutely impoffible for Adam to know all this, (for in truth nothing leſs than infinite wifdom could know it,) 'tis evident he could not take upon him to pro- nounce, that this fhould be the ftate of mar- riage, but by expreſs revelation from God; and this reaſoning clearly confirms the truth of our Saviour's explication of this paffage in the 19th chapter of St. Matthew's gofpel, 4th, 5th, and 6th verfes, where he tells us, that the words pronounced by Adam on this oc- cafion, were the declaration of God himſelf And he answered and ſaid unto them, Have ye not } REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 33 not read, that he which made them in the bes ginning, made them male and female? and faid, For this caufe hall man leave father and mother, and ſhall cleave to his wife, and they twain ſhall be one flesh. Here you find, that the declaration afcribed by Mofes to Adam, is aſcribed by Chrift to God; from whence it is evident, that the declaration which Adam made on this occafion, was in confequence of an exprefs revelation from God.--- Which was the thing to be proved. And here 'tis well worth obferving, that if we ſuppoſe Adam uninform'd by God in the reafon of that infeparable union of one man with one wo- man in marriage, which he had then ordain- ed, this appointment was, with regard to Adam, a mere pofitive inftitution; and, I be- lieve, no one imagines that it was not for regarded by his fons for fix thouſand years: and yet in reality it was (and is now demon- ftrated to be) a law of nature: and ſhall we yet dare to pronounce that God has no right to bind fuch reafonable clear-fighted creatures as we are, by inftitutions apparently po- fitive? D DISSER- 34 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. : DISSERTATION IV. Of the skill of language infus'd into H Adam. AVING demonftrated the necef- fity of a revelation to be made to Adam in relation to marriage, I proceed to fhew you, that another revelation was alfo neceffary to him in the ſtate of innocence; And that is, a revelation of language. THAT God made man a fociable creature, does not need to be proved; and that when he made him fuch, he with-held nothing from him that was in any ways neceffary to his well-being in fociety, is a clear confe- quence from the wiſdom and goodneſs of God; and if he with-held nothing any way neceffary to his well-being, much lefs would he withhold from him that which is the inftrument of the greatest REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 35 greateſt happineſs a reaſonable creature is ca- pable of in this world. -- If the Lord God made Adam a help meet for him, becauſe it was not good for man to be alone, can we ima- gine he would leave him unfurniſhed of the means to make that help uſeful and delight- ful to him? If it was not good for him to be alone, certainly neither was it good for him to have a companion, to whom he could not readily communicate his thoughts; with whom he could neither eafe his anxieties, nor divide, or double his joys,--by a kind, a friend- ly, a reaſonable, a religious converfation; and how he could do this in any degree of perfection, or to any height of rational hap- pineſs, is utterly inconceivable without the uſe of ſpeech. Now that men have not the uſe of ſpeech from nature, is an undeniable truth. -- Hero- dotus, indeed, tells us of an Ægyptian king, who caufed two children to be educated, un- der a ftrict injunction to their keeper, that they ſhould never hear a human voice; in order to learn from thence, which was the oldeft language; and that after two years, they both pronounced the word beccos at the fame time; which happened to fignify bread in the Phrygian language. This conduct of the Egyptian king was evidently abfurd; for if he made any rational enquiry by this ex- periment, it should be this, -- whether there D 2 was 36 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. was any fuch thing as a language of nature? For there could be no reaſon why an untaught child ſhould ſpeak the oldeſt, more than the lateft language, if that oldeft were not the language of nature; and if it was, not only that, but every other child, would ſpeak it untaught; nay, all mankind would of necef- fity ſpeak that language, and no other; at leaft, they would of neceffity ſpeak that, tho' they had learn'd others; and every man upon the face of the earth, would be intelligible to every other, when he fpoke it. Becauſe if founds had any natural force to exprefs things, 'tis impoffible the meaning of them could ever be doubtful, even at the firſt hear- ing; and whereas the contrary to this is un- deniably the truth; and there is no rela- tion between founds and things; and words fignify things, things, from no other than the arbitrary agreement of men; 'tis evident, that language is not natural, but inftituted; and to ſuppoſe Adam not endowed with the know- ledge and uſe of it, is to fuppofe him form'd in a much worfe condition than the birds of the air, or the beaſts of the field; who have all natural means of communicating their wants and defires, and what other ideas are neceffary to be communicated for their mu- tual aid and well-being, by uniform regular founds, immediately and equally intelligible to the whole fpecies. AND REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 37 AND that the inferior animals have not the advantage of theſe founds from inftruc- tion, or the example of their parents, is evi- dent; becauſe they are uniformly endowed with them, in all regions, and at all diſtances from any of their own ſpecies; and therefore, 'tis evident, they have their feveral languages, fuch as they are, by inftinct; that is, either immediately from the divine influence, or from fome eſtabliſhment of infinite wildom in their formation: or, in other words, that they are taught of God. And certainly none will be fo abfurd as to imagine, that God was lefs careful in the formation of man, or furniſhed them lefs perfectly, for all the ends of fociety, than he furnished the fowls of the air, or the beafts of the field; God forbid! If it be faid, That the human organs be- ing admirably fitted for the formation of articulate founds: thefe, with the help of reafon, might in time lead men to the ufe of language; I own it imaginable that they might; but ſtill, till that end were attained in perfection, which poffibly might not be in a ſeries of many generations, it muſt be own'd that brutes were better dealt by, and could better attain all the ends of their creation. And if that be abfurd to be ſuppoſed, certainly the other is not leſs abfurd D 3 10 38 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. to be believed. Nay, I think it juftly doubt- ful, whether, without infpiration from God in this point, man could ever attain the true ends of his being; at leaſt, if we may judge in this cafe, by the example of thoſe nations, who, being deftitute of the advantages of a perfect language, are, in all probability, from the misfortune of that fole defect, funk into the lowest condition of barbarifm and bruta- lity. AND as to the perfection in which the human organs are framed and fitted for the formation of articulate founds, this is clearly an argument for believing that God imme- diately bleſſed man with the uſe of ſpeech; and gave him wherewithal to exert thofe organs to their proper ends: for this is furely as credible, as that when he gave him an appetite for food, and proper organs to eat and to digeft it, he did not leave him to feek painfully for a neceffary fupply, (till his offence had made fuch a fearch his curfe and puniſhment) but placed him at once in the midft of abundant plenty. THE confequence from all which, is, that the perfection and felicity of man, and the wiſdom and goodness of God, neceffarily re- quired, that Adam fhould be fupernaturally endowed with the knowledge and ufe of lan- guage, And therefore, as certain as it can REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 39 can be, that man was made perfect and hap- py, and that God is wife and good; fo certain is it, that when Adam and Eve were formed, they were immediately enabled by God to converfe and communicate their thoughts, in all the perfection of language neceffary to all the ends of their creation. AND as this was the conduct moft become- ing the goodneſs of God; fo we are affured from Mofes, that it was that to which his in- finite wildom determined him: for we find that Adam gave names to all the creatures before Eve was formed; and confequently, before neceffity taught him the ufe of fpeech. AND thus, having proved, in a way per- fectly demonftrative to myſelf, and, I hope, fatisfactory to you, that, at leaft, five reve- lations were abfolutely neceffary to Adam in a ftate of innocence and perfection; I think, I may fairly pronounce, that the main doc- trine of our adverfaries is abfolutely over- thrown, even upon their own principles; for fuppofing man to be now in as much perfection, as he was originally formed in, (which I fhall hereafter demonftrate that he is not) yet, if I have fhewn that with all the` abilities he has now, he could not attain to the true end of his being, unaffifted by God; and our adverſaries own, that if he could not, D 4 he 40 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. he muſt be worfe dealt by than the beafts that perish; and affirm at the fame time, that the wiſdom and goodnefs of God won't allow this to be believed; it follows, upon their own principles, that if revelation was neceffary, God certainly gave it. -Now I have proved revelation to be neceffary to man, even on fuppofition of his being formed in the utmoſt perfection his nature is capable of; and furely 'tis a clear confequence from this, that it muſt be more neceffary, in pro- portion as he is found to fall fhort of that perfection for otherwife 'twould follow, that tho' the advice and skill of a phyfician was indeed neceffary in perfect health, for the regimen and prefervation of it, yet there was no fort of need of it, in ſickneſs. THAT human nature wanted the affiſt- ance of God, in the utmoſt perfection it can be imagin'd capable of, I have already proved. Now waving the queftion, whether it ever was in more perfection than it is now, which ſhall be examined on another occafion; that human nature is at this time in all the perfection it is capable of, I believe no man of common fenfe will pretend to affirm; and if it is not, why it may not yet want more affiſtance from God, will furely be hard to fay; unleſs God has already given it all the affiſtance he could give; and if he hath done io, 'tis a demonftration that he hath more than REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 41 than once inſtructed, exhorted, admoniſh'd, re- proved, and puniſhed mankind; becauſe 'tis certain that he could do all this, and that they have more than once needed the inter- pofition of God to all theſe purpoſes: unleſs it be fuppofed, that mankind are utterly in- capable of improvement or amendment; of being deterred from evil, or drawn to good; and I ſhould be very forry to have this fuppofed, even for the fake of our adverfaries. WHEREAS then the main principle upon which the arguments of our adverfaries are founded, is utterly overthrown, by demon- ftrating the neceffity of revelation, in the utmoſt ſuppoſed perfection of human nature; our controverfy with them might properly enough conclude here, if I did not hope the continuance of it, may, in the end, have better effects than the confufion of obftinacy and perverſeneſs; may, in fome mea- fure, vindicate the ways of God with men; may, by God's affiftance, inform the ignorant, fatisfy the doubtful, and con- firm the faithful; and, if not convince, yet, at leaſt, fubdue the infidel; and reduce him to the modefty of enjoying his ignorance in the humility of filence. RATIONAL doubts, propofed with candour, and debated with calmness, have unquestion- ably the cleareft claim to our moſt ſerious alten- 42 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 1 attention; as well as to our beft endeavours of clear and rational folutions; but where is the human, or even the chriftian patience that can bear with the infolence of error? To hear the moft rational conduct hu- man nature is capable of, infulted by the moft irrational; to fee men triumph on the fide of vice, against the interefts of virtue; on the fide of error, againſt the evidence of truth; with the violence of obftinacy, and blindneſs, and abfurdity, againſt the light and majefty of wiſdom is fuch an outrage upon common decency, as well as common fenfe, as no man, who hath the intereft of virtue, the honour of God, or the good of mankind at heart: is able, is obliged to bear, without indignation. I fpeak this not only as an apology for troubling the chriftian reader with recounting and confuting the errors of our adverfaries; an apology, for whatever vehemence may hereafter fall from me, in profecution of thefe bold (not gigantick) invaders of heaven. but alſo as AND now, having confidered the feveral revelations given to mankind before the fall, my method next leads me to confider, the feveral revelations given after the fall. DIS REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 43 ; DISSERTATION V. Of the revelations which immediately follow'd the fall. B ஆஇ EFORE I proceed upon this point, it will be proper to ob- ferve, that the common objection to this whole account of the fall, is its obfcurity. Now if that obfcurity neceffarily arifes from the truth of the relation, i. e. from relating that tranfaction as it really was; then this ob- jection will be ſo far from being a prejudice to revelation, that it muft greatly tend to confirm it. Now, what reaſon can be con- ceiv'd, why Mofes, who is on other occa- fions the plaineft, moft natural, moſt intel- ligible hiftorian in the world, fhould be fo very obfcure in this; unless it were, that truth requir'd it? For if we fuppofe him left to his own difcretion, or the liberty of his Own 44 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. own invention upon the point, can we ima- gine that a man of his genius could not give us a more explicit, intelligible account of this matter? there is no queftion but he could. If therefore we confider Mofes on this occafion, neither as a philofopher, nor commentator, but barely as an hiſtorian: the true way to judge whether he acted faithfully in that character, is, to enquire, whether, from the nature of the thing, a converfation in that ftate of things, between three fuch intelligent beings as are here in- troduc'd, muft not of neceffity be obfcure to us, in this ftate, and at this diftance. HUMAN nature is generally fuppofed to have been then in perfection; at leaft, Adam muſt be allow'd fufficiently acquainted with his own condition; which no man will pretend to know with equal perfpicuity at this diſtance and as the knowledge of lan- guage was infpir'd by Almighty God, Adam and Eve muft neceffarily be fuppofed fully informed of all the powers and idioms of a tongue fo taught. Let it be confidered then, that the converfations here related, are be- tween Almighty God, man fuppofed in per- fection, (at leaft, more intelligent in the point in queftion, than any man can now be ſuppoſed) and another being under the dif guife of a brute, fubtle and intelligent be- yond man, even in perfection. Now all f con- REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 45 converſation muft, in proportion to the fu- perior intelligence of the beings concerned, be obfcure to beings of lefs intelligence; efpecially, if it turns upon points in which thofe beings of inferior intelligence, are not fufficiently informed. IF three of the beſt mathematicians of the age were to converfe but one minute, upon fome important point of that fcience: or three able philofophers upon fome princi- ple of natural knowledge, then newly dif- covered; the relation of that converfation would of neceffity be obfcure to all perfons unskill'd in the ſubject of it: but fuppofing theſe fame perfons, to attain, after fome time, to a competent knowledge of the point treated upon would the obfcurity, in which the hiftorian related it, be any prejudice either to his veracity or abilities, in the opi- nion of thofe perfons? Quite otherwife; it would be a demonftration of his veracity at leaſt, if not of his skill. In like manner, if the converfations and fentences relating to the fall, can, with much ftudy, and with the advantage of all thofe improvements in knowledge, to which mankind are arrived, be now made more intelligible to us: the obfcurity, in which they have hitherto been involv'd, will be fo far from prejudicing the truth of the Mofaic relation, that it will be 3 a ſtrong, 46 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 1 a ftrong, additional argument of the writer's fidelity and veracity. Now whether they are made more intel- ligible in the fubfequent differtations, the reader will beft judge. THE firſt revelations which we meet with after the fall, are in the third chapter of Genefis, at the 14th and the following verfes; where God, upon examining into the offence of our firft parents, pronounces fentence upon the feveral criminals concern'd in it, in the following manner: 14. AND the Lord God faid unto the fer- pent, Becaufe thou hast done this, thou art curfed above all cattel, and above every beast of the field: upon thy belly fhalt thou 80, and duft shalt thou eat all the days of thy life; 15. And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy feed and her feed; it fall bruife thy head, and thou shalt bruife his heel. • 16. UNTO the woman he faid, I will greatly multiply thy forrow, and thy conception; in forrow shalt thou bring forth children; and thy defire fhall be to thy husband, and he ſhall rule over thee. 17. AND REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 47 17. AND unto Adam he faid, Becauſe thou haft hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and haft eaten of the tree of which I commanded thee, faying, Thou shalt not eat of it; curfed is the ground for thy fake; in forrow halt fhalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life. 18. THORNS alfo and thistles fhall it bring forth unto thee, and thou shalt eat the herb of the field. 19. IN the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it waft thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto duft shalt thou return. Obfervatí- ons upon the on nounced Adam and Eve, fuch a HERE is a terrible denunciation of toil, and mifery, and death, upon two creatures, who being fentences pro- inur'd to nothing, and form'd for nothing, but happineſs, muſt feel infinitely more horror from fentence, than we, who are now well ac- quainted with theſe great enemies of our nature, (familiar with death, intimate with mifery, and born to forrow as the Sparks fly upward,) can have any notion of. The whole creation curft around 'em, and on their account; and they, for that very rea- fon, more accurft in the midft of it! This is fuch an image of complicated and accumu- lated 3 48 REVELATION Examin'd, &e. lated diſtreſs, as were utterly inſupportable- even to innocence; and much more to guilt. And therefore, if ever man needed a revelation of mercy, 'twas certainly at this black and difmal moment: which, if not relieved with fome beam of hope, muft of neceffity have carried them both quick to perdition. THE majefty of God, array'd in all the terrors of juftice, of juftice unallay'd by mercy, is evidently no object of religious adoration, to finners: love, and hope, and confidence, are effential ingredients of that glorious office; and without thefe, expe- rience affures us, that religion quickly con- cludes in diftraction and defpair. And if religion once fail'd amidſt the miſeries of mortality, now denounced upon our firſt parents, 'tis certain their next rational wifh muft be, that life fhould do fo too. 'Tis evident therefore, that both religion and nature muft fink in this exigence, un- fupported by fome ftay of rational hope. They had loft every thing by their fin; their perfection, their innocence, the favour of God, and their original felicity: and there- fore 'tis evident, that no hope could be a fufficient ſtay, could afford them any degree of rational fupport, in this exigence: but a ftrong and well-grounded affurance of re- covering REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 49 covering what they had loft: and 'tis as evident, that no ray of rational hope, and much lefs of any folid affurance, fhines thro' all this revelation, unlefs in the fen- tence of the ferpent: and, if that means not more than the letter of it feems to import, there is certainly no rational confidence or confolation to be drawn from that. For what confolation could it be to Adam to know (tho' the fentence is alfo true in this fenfe) that his pofterity would hate ferpents, and ferpents them? That they fhould fome- times have their heels hurt by that hateful animal; and, in return, fhould fometimes trample thofe vile creatures to death? Adam muſt be fallen indeed, fallen below the laft degree of common fenfe, to derive any de- gree of fatisfaction or fupport from this fenfe of the words. And therefore 'tis evident, he muft endeavour The fentence ferpent, a ra- tional founda- tion of hope to Adam, to derive his hopes from fome pafs'd upon the other interpretation of them; and he was fufficiently juftified in doing fo. For he was told, that his feed ſhould bruife that very ſerpent's head. If that meant no more than vengeance upon the ferpent; what hinder'd him from taking it? If vengeance has any good in it, certainly the more fpeedy, and the more effectual, the better. And what rea- fon was there to believe, that any of his fons would be in a better condition to effect E this, 50 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. this, than himſelf? Or where ſhould they be fure to find this individual creature, when they would effect it? 'Tis evident therefore, that he could fee no reafon in the world, why this puniſhment ſhould be referred to any of his poſterity, but this only; that fome of his pofterity would be enabled to execute that ſentence, in fome other ſenſe than he himſelf could. And furely, if the words of the ſentence did not, upon a due enquiry, give a ſuffi- cient foundation for fuch an hope, neither would God have deliver'd his fentence in fuch a manner; nor fo wife a man as Mofes, been fo careful to convey an unmeaning, unintelligible fentence to pofterity. that Mofes was a great and a wife man, eminent for depth of fenfe, as well as dignity and perfpicuity of ftyle, no eminent or en- larg'd genius ever yet denied, or doubted. And therefore, even in honour to fo great an authority, we fhould endeavour to find out fome better meaning under the veil of thoſe words. For AND in order to conduct us in this fearch, we muſt remember that the earlieft method of inftructing mankind, in all fublime and important truths, was by allufions to, and metaphors drawn from fenfible things and as this is the earlieft, fo is it alſo the eafieft, method of inftruction, becauſe it ſpeaks to the underſtanding, by the fenfes; which is at REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 51 at all times the fureft method of conveying knowledge to the mind; and was, till later refinements introduc'd abftractions, and uni- verfal ideas, the only poffible method of inftructing to any purpofe. Nay, fome de- gree of this, is abfolutely neceffary at this day: nor can the moſt refined abſtractions of quantity and power, be conveyed to us, without the affiftance of fenfible fymbols; fuch as, figures, lines, and letters. And certainly ſuch ſymbols, as have an an evident analogy to the things fignified, are more intelligible and inſtructive, than any arbitrary or artifi- cial figns, or characters, can be. Now, this being premis'd, I will venture to affirm, that, if Adam and Eve are allow'd to have any degree of good underſtanding, (and there is good reafon to believe they had, at leaft, as good as any of their pofterity) they could not but clearly fee a far higher and nobler meaning, in the fentence denounced againſt the ſerpent, than the words feem at firft fight to import. And to lead them more clear- ly to this way of thinking, 'tis fufficiently ap- parent, that they faw fome vengeance imme- diately executed by Almighty God upon that creature; and that this vengeance was to them a fignificant emblem of that final over- throw, which he was one day to fuffer from the feed of the woman. St. Paul, in the eighth chapter of his epiftle to the Romans, gives us plainly to underftand, that all the E 2 creatures 52 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. creatures were curft in the fall: nay, 'tis evident, that the creatures must be affected by the curfe denounced upon the earth; and that the curfe of the other creatures is plainly implied in that of the ferpent. For when God fays to him, Thou art curfed above all cattel, and above every beast of the field, what can be clearer, than that the meaning of theſe words is this: that tho' the other creatures of the earth were curft in fome meaſure, yet the ferpent was more fignally curft than any of them. Now, being curft, plainly implies being fome way or other reduc'd to a worfe condition; and therefore his (the ferpent) being curft in a more remarkable manner, muft certainly fignify, his being reduc'd to a remarkably worfe condition than he was in before. And what that reduction might be, feems fufficiently hinted in the following words; Upon thy belly shalt thou go, and duft fhalt thou eat all the days of thy life. Now thefe words are plainly a denunciation of puniſhment; and fufficiently imply the very execution of that curfe upon him. But furely, if the ferpent was originally form'd to go upon his belly, and to eat duft, his continuing in that con- dition in which God had created him, could be no puniſhment. And therefore, either theſe words have no meaning at all, (which it would be both abfurd and blafphemous to ſuppoſe) or elſe they muft mean his being reduc'd, REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 53 reduc'd, from that moment, to fome lower and more abject condition, than that in which he was created. AND 'tis evident, that in fact he is in a much lower, a more abject, a more hateful, a more curft condition, than any other beaft of the field; lefs fitted for happineſs in that element to which he is doom'd; defti- tute of every limb, every beauty of propor- tion, and every perfection of every kind, that can render the other creatures of the earth either amiable or excellent! hateful and noxious to the whole brute world, and yet more remarkably fo to man their mafter! AND what lower, more abject, or more deteftable life can be imagin'd than this? Reduced to the vileft condition of the vileft worm of the earth; reduced, as near as can be imagin'd, to the very figure and imper- fection of an embryo. PLINY indeed mentions a report, which he had heard, of a kind of ferpents with feet ; but Ariftotle difcredits this opinion: (tho' a late* writer affirms himſelf, to have feen fuch animals in Grand-Cairo.) Herodotus tells us, of fome winged ferpents that fly annually * Vide Blunt's Voyage to the Levant, &c. E 3 from 54 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. ! from Arabia to Egypt; and later obferva- tions have diſcovered fome winged and bright fhining ferpents in the eaſtern and fouthern parts of the world: and there is alſo mention made of fome of the fame fpecies in Ifaiah, and in the book of Num- bers. But yet every one of theſe eat duft, and crawl upon the earth; and probably thefe are permitted by Almighty God to re- tain, even yet, fome fmall remains of their original luftre and perfection, to give us fome idea of that glory in which they were created, and from which the curfe of God hath thrown them down. BUT here it may be ask'd, How this fup- pofed diminution of the ferpent's glory could be of any ufe to Adam? I anſwer, Many ways. For if, the ferpent boafted to Eve, that he had acquired new excellence and perfection by eating the forbidden fruit; nor was it obfcurely infinuated, that this was the pure vertue of that fruit; indepen- dent of the power of God; and that it would have a proportionable effect on them alfo : God knoweth, fays he, that in the day ye eat thereof, ye shall be as gods. Now nothing could fo effectually confute this vain boaſt, and wicked infinuation, as letting Adam and Eve fee, that imperfection, and lofs of ex- cellence, was the only certain confequence of REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 55 of his delufion, and oppofition to the will of God. MORE than this, 'tis not improbable that, without the example of divine vengeance on the ferpent, Adam and Eve would be apt to flatter themſelves (as many of their poſterity profanely do at this day) that God Almighty would not be ſo ſevere upon them, for eat- ing an apple; little confidering, that the cafinefs of the reftraint greatly added to the guilt of difobedience. And therefore no- thing could more effectually convince them of the heinoufnefs of their guilt, and the certainty of divine vengeance due to it, than the immediate puniſhment of that creature, which was no more than the mere inftru- ment of evil. It was eafy for them to infer, if the mere inftrument of evil is thus punished, what will become of the real authors and actors? AND befides all this, doubtless it was fome confolation, as well as matter of much in- ftruction, to Adam, to fee that glorious in- ftrument of evil, ſtripp'd of all his pride and pre-eminence of form, and perfection of parts; and laid proftrate and groveling at his feet. Anticipating, in this fhameful fall, and difmal degradation, that dreadful defeat, and utter diminution of glory, which awaited the adverſary of mankind, (and perhaps under E 4 56 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. under this very form) when the feed of the woman ſhould bruife his head. BUT here it may be objected, that, all this is only an account of vengeance upon the ferpent; whereas the fcriptures of the new teftament explain all this of Satan, under the image of a ferpent. I ANSWER, that Adam and Eve could not but know, before this time, that the ferpent was only an inftrument of mifchief, made ufe of by fome malignant fpirit, in enmity to God and them. I fay, Adam and Eve could not but know this. For they had learn'd, by their own fad experience, that the forbidden fruit had not the vertue of en- nobling nature, and infpiring new abilities, but quite the contrary: and they knew the ferpent had neither fpeech nor reafon from nature; and therefore the delufion put upon them, must be the contrivance of fome be- ing, not only fuperior to the ferpent, but alfo far fuperior to themſelves. The work of fome fpirit, which had taken poffeffion of the ferpent's body, and wrought this delufion, by his organs. Now a fpirit affuming and actuating the body of a ferpent, may, I think, with great propriety be called a ferpent; as the Son of God, affuming a human body, is called a man; REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 57 1 man; and therefore the ftyle of the fcrip- tures is fufficiently juftified, in the appella- tion of fatan, by the name of the ferpent. Nor is there any more difficulty in con- ceiving how fatan could actuate the organs of the ferpent on this occafion, than how a reaſonable foul can actuate the organs of this animal body we bear about us. BUT fome will ask, How Adam and Eve could have any idea of fpirits? I anfwer, Many ways, conceivable even to us; and many ways utterly inconceivable at this diſtance, and in this ftate of things. We are told, in the 28th chapter of Job, that when the foundations of the earth were laid, the fons of God fhouted for joy. And pro- bably their jubilee was not lefs at the com- pletion of that great work. And who can fay that Adam and Eve might not have been witneſſes to the hallelujahs of that heavenly chorus on this occafion? or, who will fay, that, in the perfection and innocence of their nature, they were not fubjects worthy the curiofity, and companions not unworthy the converſation of the higheſt order of heavenly beings? And what might they not learn from fuch a communication? BUT ſhould nothing of this kind inform them, can it be imagined that Adam had not knowledge to all the purpoſes that we have? Or, 58 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. Or, at leaſt, to all the purpofes of his duty and well-being? Adam could not fure be ignorant, that he had a thinking principle within himfelf, of a very fuperior nature to the whole order of beings about him and it was very eaſy for him to imagine, that other thinking beings might exceed him, as far as he exceeded the beft, or even the meaneft, of the brutes. Nay more, if we allow him as much capacity as any man of common contemplation among his fons, (and one would imagine this were no mighty con- ceffion,) 'tis evident, he muft foon learn, that the bodies of the creatures, could, of them- felves, have neither fenfe nor motion: he knew they were made of duft; and furely it requir'd no great fagacity to know, that neither duft, nor any thing made of duft, could think or move: And therefore, what- ever thought or motion was obfervable in the creatures, muft be owing to the action and perception of fome fpirit within them: And, this point being gain'd, it was cer- tainly eaſy for him to proceed one ſtep far- ther; and to reafon thus with himſelf; that the fentence of toil and bodily labour, which it pleaſed God to pronounce againſt him, on this occafion, could never be intended to terminate only in his body; which was, in truth, no more than the poor, paffive, un- offending inftrument of the fpirit that ruled it: And, 'tis evident, that when he once knew, REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 59 knew, that the ferpent had not beguiled Eve by vertue of new faculties, deriv'd from eating the forbidden fruit, nor by the power of his own fpirit, which difcovered no fuch ability either before or after: he was under a neceffity of concluding, that this creature muft have beguiled her, by the power of fome other ſpirit, dwelling in him at that time: and when he once concluded this, he could not but conclude, that the fentence paſs'd upon that animal, muft of neceffity be referr'd to that fpirit which ruled his carcass on this occafion; that carcafs, which was no more than the paffive inftrument of a fupe- rior intelligence. This, I fay, muft be as clear- ly intelligible to Adam, as that the fentence of pain and puniſhment paſs'd upon himſelf, tho' literally decreed againſt his body, muſt of neceffity refer, and be intended as a puniſhment, to the principle of perception in him, which ruled and fwayed his body, to the committal of that crime, which deferved fuch vengeance from his Maker. AND, if Adam could have any doubt of the truth of this reaſoning, the fentence of God, pronounced against the ferpent, muft clearly and fully confirm him in it. For that fentence is plainly directed and de- nounced againſt an intelligent being, and a free agent; who had committed a crime, which a brute was not capable of commit- ting; 60 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. ļ ting; and deferved a puniſhment, which a mere paffive inftrument could not deſerve. And this confideration could not but afcer- tain to Adam, the true object of the divine wrath and vengeance, on this occafion which could be no other, than the evil fpirit who had committed the offence. ; AND, when he was once fully poffeffed of this point, all the reft was eafy. His next enquiry naturally would be, what his Maker could mean, by bruifing the head of that inftrument of miſchief? That he could not underſtand this according to the letter, I have already fhewn; and therefore, he was under a neceffity of interpreting it in a figurative fenfe. And certainly it was not hard for him to conceive, that the head was a natural and obvious emblem of power and pre-eminence. And fo natural an emblem it is, that it hath been us'd as another name for power, in all ages, and in moft languages of the world, and eſpecially the Hebrew. And furely it would be hard to ſuppoſe Adam ignorant of the idiom of his own tongue; as there is all the reafon in the world to believe, that the Hebrew was his own. BESIDES this, he could not but know, that his own head ruled the reft of his body; and that it was the feat of that dominion, REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 61 dominion, wherewith he prefided over the reft of the creatures: and therefore he could not but quickly and clearly conclude, that the bruifing the head of the ferpent, muft fignify, the cruſhing and deftroying the domi- nion and power of that fpirit, which had now ſway'd the organs of this creature, to his deftruction. AND probably it was in allufion to this hiftory, and this interpretation, that ferpents have been confider'd as emblems of power, from the earlieſt antiquity. And we know, that when Epaminondas * would teach his foldiers that they ſhould deftroy the whole power of the enemy, if they could once break the Spartans, who were at their head; he did this by bruifing the head of a great ferpent before them, and then fhewing them, that the reft of the body was of no force. And it were hard if Adam could not con- ceive the head of a ferpent, to be a proper emblem of hoftile power, as well as Epami- nondas. And this once understood, his hopes muft quickly riſe in confequence of that light. } He found that the feed of the woman (which doubtlefs he underſtood to be her Vid. Polyæn. Stratag. 1. 2. iffue 62 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. ! iffue by him) was to be at enmity with this evil fpirit; and fhould, in the end, deftroy his power. Enmity implies an oppofition of inclination and intereft; and therefore enmity to evil, muft infer an inclination to good. And fuch a difpofition in his feed, gave hopes of a recovery of that rectitude of will, which he himself had loft by his dif- obedience. fairly de- Nor is it to not at leaſt BUT whatever Adam might do, we plainly fee that theſe confequences are duceable from that fentence. be imagined, that Adam could conceive fo much hope from it, as was fuffi- cient to keep up a ſenſe of religion in his mind; which was all that was abfolutely neceffary. It was alfo obvious for him to conclude, that the deftroying the power of his adverſary, muft imply conqueft; that the conqueft of a ſpirit fo fuperior to himſelf, muft neceffarily imply abilities very much fuperior to his own; and if his feed were once poffeffed of rectitude of will, added to better abilities, they muft, at leaſt, be re- ftored to the primitive perfection of human nature; and feemingly to more. And in that perfection, they muft certainly be ac- ceptable to their Maker. 'Tis true, he and Eve muſt return to their duft; and poffibly might not live to fee this triumph REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 63 triumph and reftitution of their ſpecies, in their feed; the humility, to which the ſenſe of their guilt had reduced them, would eaſily fuggeft, that probably they, who were fuch criminals, were unworthy the honour and happineſs of being admitted to fee that blef fed ſtate of things; but, however, it could not fail to be matter of infinite fatisfaction to them, to think, that their pofterity fhould attain it. AND thus, having inconteftably proved the neceffity of fome revelation of mercy to be given to Adam, at the time of that unfpeak- able calamity with which he was over- whelm'd, upon the denunciation of God's wrath against him; and having, by a na- tural, and obvious train of thinking, fhewn you, that Adam, with a common degree of reafon and reflection, muft, after mature reflection and deliberation, of neceffity con- clude, that Eve's deception was wrought by a malignant fpirit, acting by the organs of the ferpent; and confequently, that the fentence, denounced againſt that creature, muft of neceflity be referred to that evil fpirit, who was the author of the guilt; having alfo fhewn you, how Adam, by a very natural and obvicus interpretation of one figurative expreffion, agreeable to the idiom of his own language, might derive clear and rational hopes of the deftruction of 64 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 4 of his real enemy, from the fentence pro- nounced againſt the ferpent; as alfo of the reftitution of his pofterity to their original purity and perfection, by that deftruction: I fhould next proceed, to clear fome other diffi- culties in relation to this fentence. A digreffion in anſwer to one part of the letter to Dr. Waterland. BUT before I enter upon this fubject, I muft beg leave to ob- viate a common objection which lies againſt this way of interpre- tation, which I have now taken; viz. that it is not fair to interpret one fen- tence of the fame difcourfe literally, and another figuratively: and a late ingenious writer* infults the weaknefs and ignorance of believers upon this head, with fuch a viva- city and fulneſs of fpirits, as is not always decent, even even in the triumphs of truth. Speaking of the Mofaic hiftory of the crea- tion, fall, &c. he has theſe words: "MUST we believe it all an allegory? "No. "No. Muft we believe it to be all literal? What then are we to do? Why we "are to confider it neither as fact nor fable; "neither literal nor allegorical; but both to- "gether to interpret one fentence literally; "the next allegorically, &c. * Letter to Dr. Waterland, p. 14. "FOR REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 65 FOR inftance; God made man, we accept literally; but after his own image, in a figu- rative or metaphorical fenfe, &c. Now 'tis evident from this inftance, that this ingenious writer makes no diſtinction between metaphor and allegory; if he had, he could not but fee, that he is the allegorical interpreter, who takes the whole account of the fall, as related by Mofes, to be a kind of Egyptian, or eaſtern fable; under which fome hidden truth is intended to be convey'd; and that Dr. Waterland, and fuch as think with him, underſtand the Mofaic account of this matter, as no way fabulous or hierogly- phical; but an hiftorical relation of fact; (a real ſerpent, a real apple, &c.) tho' with fome obfcurity, and fome metaphorical ex- preffions. I CAN'T explain myſelf on this head bet- ter, than by the inftance objected by this gentleman, (the author of the letter.) GOD made man, we accept literally; but after his own image, in a figurative or meta- phorical fenfe: And with great fubmiffion to this ingenious writer; What is there, unfair, or irrational in this conduct? Is not this the proper, and the rational way of interpreting every writing under heaven, as well as the F fcrip- 66 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. fcriptures? Is there one good writing in the world, which must not thus be interpreted in every page? and would not otherwife be abfurd and unintelligible? IT were eaſy to illuftrate this in infinite inftances; but I fhall beg leave only to mention one; and from an author, whom, I am fure, this gentleman will not deny to be a good writer. In the letter to Dr. Waterland, p. 15. are thefe words, "Now is it not more ra- ❝tional to follow one uniform confiftent 66 way of interpretation, than to jump at every ſtep, ſo arbitrarily from letter to "allegory? And if the letter be found in "fact contradictory to reaſon, and the no- "tions we have of God, What is there left, "but to recur to allegory?" Now taking the words allegory and meta- phor to fignify the fame thing, (as this gen- tleman has thought fit to do on this occaſion) I would gladly know how the reader is to underſtand this period. Muft he believe it all an allegory? No. Muſt he believe it fhould all be interpreted according to the letter? No. What then are we to do? Why, we are to confider it as neither literal nor allegorical, but both together. FOR -L f REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 67 FOR inftance, the first part of the period, [now is it not more rational to follow one uniform confiftent way of interpretation] is neither literal, nor allegorical, but both together: the words, more rational, I under- ftand literally to follow one uniform confiftent way, I take to be metaphorical: the words, of interpretation, I underſtand literally the fubfequent words, to jump at every step, I take to be metaphorical: and for this plain reafon ; : I CANNOT believe that a writer of fuch excellent underſtanding, can mean literal, real jumps and ſteps in this place; becaufe fuch an interpretation would be found in fact contradictory to reafon, and the notions we have of good writing: What then is there left (to uſe his own words) but to recur to allegory? Now what I cannot believe of this author, I cannot believe of Mofes: and therefore, when Mofes fays, that man was made in the image of God; I can no more underſtand the word image here, of a real, literal, fenfible image, than I can this author's jumps and Steps in this place, to fignify real, literal jumps and steps; becauſe I think one inter- pretation would be as contradictory to rea- fon, and as unworthy of Mofes, and of God, F 2 as 68 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. as the other would be unworthy of this inge- nious author. I APPEAL to every reader of candor and common fenfe; Would it not be exceffively abfurd, or exceffively difingenuous in me, not to interpret this ingenious author's writ- ings in a fair, rational way; as partly literal, and partly figurative? And can I efcape the jufteft imputations of abfurdity and difin- genuity, if I fail to treat the writings of Mofes with the fame candor, and to judge of them by the fame rules of rational inter- pretation? And muft it follow from hence, that we muſt confider this hiſtory as neither fact nor fable? No, furely, fince figurative interpretations, of particular fentences, in hiſtorical relations, are perfectly confiftent with the ftricteft truth of fact. All then that can be required of us, is, to fhew that this hiftory, confidered as ftrictly true in fact, (tho', in fome refpects, obfcure) has nothing in it, that we can find, any way unworthy either of the wiſdom or goodneſs of God.- How far the precedent differtations have effected this; as alfo, how far the fubfe- quent, may be of any ufe to the fame pur- poſe, the reader will beft judge. DIS- REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 69 DISSERTATION VI. Concerning fome difficulties and objections that lie against the Mofaic account of the fall. COME now to confider fome diffi- culties which yet lie againſt my explication of this fentence, as pronounced upon fatan under the image of the ferpent. AND the firft difficulty is this; WHY God punished the evil spirit, under the figure of the ferpent ? THAT it was neceffary, in the wiſdom of God, to punish the author of evil at this time, and in the prefence of Adam and Eve, is evident; Otherwiſe they might have been led into a moft dangerous and deftructive F 3 error : 70 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. error: they might imagine, that there was fome principle of evil in the world, fome powerful malignant fpirit independent of God, and capable of controlling his will: * and therefore there was a neceffity that God fhould exert fuch a power over this evil fpirit, in the prefence of Adam and Eve, as might convince them, that he was fubject to the almighty power of their Maker; and feverely accountable to him, for all the mif chief he wrought in the world; as might convince them, in the ftyle of the prophet, that he was God, and that there was none elfe; that he was God, and there was none like him, faying, My counfel ſhall ſtand, and I will do all my pleasure. And what could be a clearer proof of this, than ſub- duing that evil fpirit, in that very brutal diſguiſe, which he had put on, the better to accompliſh his malice againſt God, and his creatures; than to let them fee, that he. was not fo much as able to defend the poor creature, whoſe carcafs he had ufurp'd, from immediate infamy; nor dared fo much as to open his mouth, either in vindication of his own conduct, or mitigation of his fentence? Now (to fay nothing of the fentence pafs'd upon the principal himſelf on this * See Dr. Sherlock's difcourfes of prophefy. occafion) REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 71 1 occafion) 'tis evident, that an uncontrolled puniſhment of the accomplices in guilt, in the prefence of the principal, plainly proves a power over the principal; and the nature of the proceeding, muft fuppofe the chief cri- minal prefent, when fentence was pafs'd. THE fame thing is alfo evident, from the tenor of the ſentence, exprefsly directed to him, i. e. directed against the ferpent, as an intelligent criminal. Nor will the malignity of his nature fuffer us fo much as to fufpect that he would attempt to retire, before he was furpriz'd in his guilt by God: for that would infallibly fuggeft to him, to ftay, and enjoy the fruits of his triumph, to the full. Or, if we fufpect that his malignity would not detain him, his curioſity certainly would. Nay, there was a neceffity, in point of real information, that he ſhould ſtay: for, in truth, it was impoffible otherwife for him to know, what evil effects the forbidden fruit would have upon that unhappy pair: for this, nothing but God, who made that and them, could know, without experiment and obfervation. Nay, there is reafon to believe that he expected they would die that very day; from thoſe words of God to them, In the day ye eat thereof ye shall furely die: and this feems to have been his chief aim, in deluding them to eat that fruit: the utter deftruction of that fpecies, for whom God had created a world, F 4 72 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. world, was a fcheme of evil worthy his higheſt malignity; and therefore there is not the leaft doubt of his waiting there, with the utmost impatience to fee the fuccefs of his device. Or, if we could fuppofe him fled, how eafy was it for an all-powerful, omniprefent Being, to bring him back to the place of his punishment? And when he was there, the wiſdom of God would naturally engage him to arreft him there, in fuch a manner, as to leave Adam and Eve fully fatisfied, that he heard and felt the vengeance denounc'd againſt him; which it was eaſy for God to do, and which doubtlefs he did. AND as to his being punifh'd, under the figure of the ferpent, we know, that a ſpirit cannot be punish'd, to human eyes, other- wife than under fome fenfible appearance; and what other fenfible appearance could have any relation to him, or his crime? and befides, what could be a more proper humi- liation of his pride, than to puniſh him under that (now debaſed) brutal form, in which he perpetrated the guilt? Suppoſe a prince furpriz❜d a malignant fubject, of the firft quality, plotting rebellion againſt him, in fome obfcure and infamous difguife; may we not imagine, that it would greatly add to his mortification, to be executed, in all the infamy of that character he had taken upon REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 73 upon him? and yet the mortification muſt be infinitely ſtronger in the prefent cafe. To have the proudest fpirit of heaven degraded down to the infamy of a brute! Nay, to have that very brute, degraded far below his own natural character, funk into the very loweft and vileft condition of brutality, in order to fink his inmate yet lower! To have the proudeft fpirit of heaven, known by no other name among men and angels, to all eternity, than that of a vile ferpent; nor diftinguifh'd for any other talents, than fuch as characterize that baſeft of brutes, to the whole world; de- ceit, treachery, malignity, and enmity to every thing good and excellent! O Lucifer, Jon of the morning, how art thou fallen from heaven! How art thou cut down to the ground! Thou that faidft in thy heart, I will afcend unto heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God, I will afcend above the heights of the clouds, I will be like to the Moft High, brought down to hell! yet art thou THE next queftion that comes to be ex- amin'd is this: WHY the ferpent was punish'd, being in- capable of guilt. IN 74 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. In anſwer to this; I must own 'tis to me a moſt ſhocking and prefumptuous enquiry, to ask why God difpofes or determines of his creatures, in this or that manner! Is it not enough for us to know, that the purity and perfection of his nature, will not ſuffer him to act, otherwiſe, than by the direction of infinite wiſdom, under the influence of infinite good- nefs? Cannot he, who gave being, and beauty, and excellence to his creatures, refume them all, when, and as often as he thinks fit? and fhall we fay unto God, What doft Thou? But forafmuch as queſtions of this kind, are often ask'd from a feeming concern for the honour of God, and therefore have fome claim to our regard on that fcore; let it be fufficient to tell all fuch enquirers, that God created the brute world, for his own glory, and the good of man; i. e. for the manifeſtation of his infi- nite wiſdom and goodneſs, in providing fo amply, and fo admirably, for the human hap- pineſs; and that his wiſdom, as well as good- nefs, to the brute world, is yet farther mani- fefted, in fubmitting them to the dominion of man; as might eafily be made appear; and as for their outward fplendor, inaſmuch as it appears to be of no confequence to themſelves, 'tis not eafy to conceive, why Infinite Wiſdom poured it upon them, in ſuch variety and pro- fufion, unleſs, to entertain the curiofity and the wonder of that active and inquifitive fpi- rit, } REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 75 rit, wherewith he hath endowed this lord of the nether world. That his curiofity, ſhould even in its weakneſs, lead him in every reſearch, to adore his Almighty Maker, with high- er degrees of admiration and reverence. And therefore, fhould thefe outward perfections, by any unhappy accident, become fo far liable to be abus'd, as to defeat the very ends for which they were beftowed: must not the ſame goodneſs take them away, for the very fame reafons for which he bestowed them? And this, according to the tenor of Mofes's account, is the very cafe of the ferpent in the point before us. When Satan had feduc'd man to fin against his Maker, by the abufe of thofe very perfections, in one of his creatures, which fhould naturally have inflam'd his ado- ration, into higher acts of praiſe and thankf giving the power and wifdom of God were many ways concerned to impair that excel- lence, which was ſo abus'd. I. THE power and majefty of God were concern'd (as I before fhew'd you) in letting Adam and Eve fee, that the wicked fpirit, who had employed the ferpent's organs to their hurt, was not able to defend his own inſtrument, from immediate difgrace: His wiſdom alfo demanded fome fignal mark of vengeance against the inftrument of evil; in manifeftation of his invincible abhorrence of guilt. (So the beaft that had been abus'd to unclean- 76 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. uncleannefs, under the law, was to perifh; and the very gold which compos'd that calf that feduc'd Ifrael to fin, was to be difpers'd and mix'd with common duft.) And who will fay, that the vindication of God's authority, and the fteady, unalterable manifeftation of his irreconcileable enmity to evil, are not of infinitely more value, than the beauty, or even the being, of the higheſt and nobleſt of his creatures? Nor can it be pretended, that there is the leaft fhadow of injuftice in the cafe; it being a known maxim, that there can be no injury, where there is no right: And what other right has any creature to being or excel- lence of any kind, but the will of his Maker? Befides, it can't be fuppos'd there was any hardſhip to the creature, in the curfe now de- nounced; for what we call a worfe condition in the creatures, muft ariſe, from a contraction of life, a diminution of happineſs, a diminu- tion of outward fplendor and perfection, or fome acceffion of real mifery. As to the two firſt, 'tis evident, that if brutes are fuppos'd to be created in that ſtate, and with that degree of happineſs, in which we now fee them, we can make no reaſonable objection to the divine goodnefs on that account; and certainly 'tis no more an imputation upon the Divine Goodneſs, to reduce them to this ftate, than it would have been to have created them in it: For as brutes have no anticipa- tion of death, nor a capacity of reflecting and REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 77 and comparing, 'tis evident that a diminution of happineſs, which implies no degree of mi- fery, can be no evil. A lefs good, is indeed comparatively evil; but then this idea of evil arifes entirely from compariſon : And there- fore where there is no compariſon, there cer- tainly can be no ratio of evil; and where there is no evil, there can be no injury. As to the 3d point, 'tis evident, that all outward perfections of the creatures, with all fuch qualities as may make them more ami- able and uſeful to man, were beftow'd folely for the fake of man: Nor can brutes be rea- fonably fuppos'd to have an idea of them; nor would the ends of their being (with regard to themſelves) be any way defeated by a di- minution of them. God made this earth and all the creatures amiable and excellent, to make the world a fcene of greater happineſs to a creature that was to continue in it but when fin introduc'd death, he curs'd the earth and the creatures by a diminution of excel- lence; to make the world lefs defirable to a creature who was fo foon to leave it. Now a diminution of outward excellence, or other qualities that might make the creatures more ufeful and amiable to man, by no means in- fers a diminution of real happineſs; and much leſs an acceffion of real mifery; which the goodnefs of God will not fuffer us to fufpect him capable of inflicting upon an innocent creature. 78 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. creature. The ſentence denounced againſt him (the ferpent) does indeed affect his form and food; but not his fubtilty, nor perhaps his ſtrength: or, ſay it affected his ftrength as well as form, 'tis evident, that the wiſdom of God is in this cafe beyond all compariſon bet- ter manifeſted, in the ample fupport of ap- parent incapacity and imperfection. For ex- ample, if God hath deprived the ferpent of feet to carry him to a due fearch of the ne- ceffities of life, furely he hath abundantly compenſated that defect, by feeding him to the full at his eafe; as it is notorious, that even the birds of the air fly into his very mouth to feed him. And 'tis perhaps for no other reaſon, that God Almighty hath per- mitted many of theſe creatures to grow to an enormous bulk, thro' the courſe of many fuc- ceeding centuries, but that men might bear witneſs to the extraordinary, and, to us, mira- culous fupport of this feemingly imperfect animal, from generation to generation. As we are told, there was a ferpent in Africa, in the time of the firſt Carthaginian war, of fuch an enormous ſtrength and fize, as gave Regulus and his army work enough to fubdue him, with their engines of war; (as we are alſo told of many others) and if after this, you fuppofe the ferpent's ftrength diminiſhed, at least it muſt be allowed, that this diminution was not more than was abfolutely neceffary. MOSES REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 79 MOSES tells us in the 3d chapter of Gene- fis, That the ferpent was more fubtile than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made. And naturalifts affure us, that his fubtilty en- ables him to contend with the ftrength of the elephant, and to conquer it: others tell us, that the ſerpent has a faſcination in his eyes; and bewitches the creatures to their deftruc- tion. And what does all this mean, but that he has a fubtilty in tempting and feducing, which exceeds not only the capacity, but the comprehenfion of the most accurate obfervers of mankind. If God then hath impaired the ſerpent to all appearance, and yet left him wherewithal to fupply all the demands of nature, in a moſt extraordinary and moſt amazing man- ner, is it poffible to imagine a greater de- monftration either of the wifdom of God, or the truth of the Mofaic hiſtory, than this? The ſerpent is impair'd, and yet he is a match for armies; he is reduc'd to all the imper- fection of a worm, and yet is he able to ſupport himſelf in a ſtate of enmity with the whole world. BUT farther yet; another reafon why the ferpent was impair'd in his outward perfec- tions, was, that this inftrument of fatan might carry leſs temptation; when God, in his in- finite wisdom, forefaw, that fatan, would, more 80 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. # more than once, abuſe this very creature, to the fame wicked purpofes. As it is notorious, that there is ſcarce a nation under heaven, which he hath not feduc'd, at fundry times, to the groffeft and vileft idolatry (even the idolatry of his own helliſh worſhip) in the figure, and under the femblance of ſerpents of all kinds. COU'D any thing then be more wife, or more beneficent in Almighty God, than to deface that excellence in the ferpent's form, which he knew would be a temptation to idolatrous worſhip; and at the fame to in- ſpire mankind with a ſtrong enmity to him, not only to with-hold, but to deter them from delufion: when he yet knew, that in fpight of all theſe diſadvantages, and this antipathy, they would be feduc'd by their adverſary, to pay him divine adoration, under that very appearance? Now this fact being admitted, what conduct could better become the wif dom and the goodnefs of God, than curfing this creature in fo eminent a manner, above all other beaſts of the field, as Mofes affures us he did? AND here I cannot help putting this plain queftion to our adverfaries; Do they know, that mankind have been fo often deluded, in fo many ages and regions of the world, to pay divine adoration to ferpents? If they do not know REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 81 know this, they are fo far from being in a condition to infult the ignorance of believers, that their own ignorance is indeed lament- able: and if they do know it, will they yet dare to deride us, for believing that Eve mif- took one of that fpecies for a reaſonable crea- ture, when fo many millions of her fons and daughters have, not only miſtaken, but ador'd an infinity of them as divine? In a word, if they do not know this, they are the moſt pi- tiable, in point of ignorance, of any fect that ever pretended to a fuperiority of light and learning; and if they do know it, they are at once the moſt fhameleſs and moſt abandon'd of the fons of Adam. Let infidels chooſe which fide of this dilemma they like beſt. BUT here it may be objected, That other creatures were worſhipped as well as the fer- pent. I ANSWER, That other creatures were alfo curfed as well as the ferpent; but as God, in his infinite wisdom, forefaw, that men would be more deluded to the worſhip of the ferpent, than to that of any other creature, as in fact they were; therefore did he curfe the fer- pent above any other creature. AGAIN; if it be asked, Why the tempter chofe the body of the Serpent preferably to that of any other creature? G I 82 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. ; I ANSWER, Becauſe he was more fubtle, and probably more excellent in his make; and his afpect more reſembling the human as fome of that fpecies are faid to have at this day. Now theſe advantages, ſeem'd to imply fuperior perfection; and fuperior perfection made the gradation from brute to rational more credible; and confequently, the true tempter was better hid; whereas, had he affumed the diſguiſe of an afs or a dove, (which a late very ingenious writer thinks had been fitter engines for fatan) the gradation had been much more prodigious; and, of confequence, much more liable to ſuſpicion and diftruſt. ADD to this, That no finite being can actuate any creature beyond what the fitneſs and capacity of his organs will admit: and therefore the natural fubtilty of the ferpent, and perhaps, the pliablenefs and forkinefs of his tongue (which we know enables other creatures to pronounce articulate founds) added to the advantages of his form, made him the fittest inftrument of delufion that can be imagin'd. BUT here it may be objected, If the tempter had fo many advantages to strengthen his delu- fion, why were our first parents punished for yielding to it? I AN- REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 83 I ANSWER, That this temptation, all things confider'd, was not ſtronger to them, than ordinary temptations are, at this day, to their pofterity. We know that temptations are now preva- lent with mankind, from ignorance, from evil example, from natural depravity, or from preffing neceffity. Ift, I SAY, men are now tempted to tranf- grefs in a thouſand inftances, from downright ignorance. Nay, they are often tempted to tranfgrefs the law of God, from the ſecret ſuggeſtions of their own corrupt hearts, or the open fuggeftions of their feducers, that it is not the law of God, but the contrivance of prieſts and princes, to keep the world in awe. But Adam and Eve had no pretence of ignorance of any kind. They knew the law, the legiflator, and the danger of tranfgreffing. God himſelf forbad them to touch the fruit; and told them the evil which would inevi- tably attend their diſobedience: therefore they are utterly inexcufable upon the head of ignorance. EVIL example they had none, but that of the ferpent: And how could the example of a brute be any rule of action to them? The example of men, is, in many inftances, in G 2 the 84 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. the place of precept to men: their wisdom, and their fuccefs, are often efteem'd fufficient fecurities for a ſafe imitation; but the exam- ple of a brute, could be neither fecurity, nor precept. What was advantageous to a fer- pent, might be pernicious to a man: what was permitted to a brute, who was neither capable of law nor fin, might, for the higheſt reaſons, be prohibited to man, who is capable of both. And NATURAL depravity they had none, being made good, and perfect in their kind. neceffity they had none, having an infinite variety of other fruits, every way as good, and as defirable, for fupply of their natural wants, as that which was with-held from them; for we are affured, that God gave them every tree upon the face of the earth, that was good for food, and pleaſant to the fight, except that fingle tree; and there is not the leaft reaſon to believe, that this had any advantage, in theſe reſpects, over any one of all the reſt. AND here I cannot but obferve, how faith- fully the fons of perdition retain, to this day, the fame fpirit of calumny, which reign'd in the old ferpent from the beginning: hardily imputing all the reftraints of religion, to the craft of God's prieſts, to keep men in ſubjection to themſelves; as fatan imputed the firſt re- ftraint, REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 85 ftraint to the craft of God, to keep man in inferiority and awe. BUT ſtill it may be ask'd, Why this inftance of obedience was exacted of Adam and Eve? and why this temptation was thrown in their way, when God knew they would tranfgrefs? SHOULD* a father difcard and difinherit his child for having deferted fome poft affign'd him, feduced either by the craft of fome old ſophiſter, or driven off by fuperior ſtrength? &c. CICERO tells us, that the very gods of the poets, had they known how pernicious their gifts would prove to their children, muſt be thought to have been wanting in kindneſs towards them, &c. I ANSWER, That theſe are indeed plaufi- ble enquiries and objections: but if they are thoroughly confidered, nothing in nature can be more prefumptuous, or unjuftifiable. For to ask, why God did not make man indepen- dent of his own authority, or fuperior to temptation in any particular inſtance, is in reality to ask, why he made him a creature? and if a creature, why a reaſonable creature, * Vide letter to Dr. Waterland, p. 17, &c. G 5 and 86 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. and a free agent? or, having made him ſuch, why he did not make him an abfolutely per- fect being, i. e. God? For if we have a right to know why God did not make him more perfect in this point of the forbidden fruit, we have the fame right to know why he did not make him more perfect in an- other, and in a third, and fo on endleſsly; till we know why he did not make him as perfect as himſelf. And if God had a right to make his creatures ameneable to his au- thority in all inftances, why not in any par- ticular inftance? Who is beft judge in this cafe, God, or you? 22 BUT this will be better cleared, by dif- cuffing this point in a more particular man- ner, IN the first place then, it is evident, that no being, is, or can be, independent, but God. Dependence is included in the very idea of a creature. If God had plac'd Adam in a ſtate of dependence upon any of the higheſt orders of heavenly beings, 'tis evident, he had been, fo far, placed in a ftate of in- felicity; becauſe the higheſt imaginable de- gree ree of created excellence, muft of neceffity imply fome degree of ignorance and imper- fection: And man had then been to arch- angels, for example, what brutes are now to men; who are, in a thouſand inſtances, in- capable REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 87 capable of fupplying their wants, or pre- venting their mifery. And therefore when God created man with a dependence only upon himſelf, 'tis evident, he, fo far, con- fulted his higheſt intereſts and happineſs. Since then, man, as a creature, muft of ne- ceffity be dependent: and, being dependent, it was his intereft to be immediately depen- dent of God: it was certainly his intereft alfo, to have a fure and conftant fenfe of that dependence kept up in his mind: for other- wife, he might lofe the advantage of it, up- on any exigency. And no created being can be imagin'd fo perfect, as never to need the guidance, or influence, or affiftance of infi- nite power, and infinite wiſdom. And if it was Adam's advantage to have a conftant fenfe of that dependency kept up in his mind, it was certainly his advantage to have fome fure and permanent memorial of it, placed before his eyes, in fuch a manner, as ſhould make it impoffible for him to forget it. BESIDES this, as Adam's intereft required fuch a dependency, the honour of God ex- acted fome manifeftation of it: for depen- dency in a creature, without fome mark or manifeſtation of ſuch a ſtate, is utterly unin- telligible; or, to fpeak more properly, is a contradiction: becaufe 'tis, with regard to that creature, to all intents and purpoſes, a ftate of independency. And therefore, if G 4 the 88 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. the honour of God, and the character of a Creator, neceffarily require fome manifefta- tion of dependency in his creatures, 'tis evi- dent, that in a reaſonable creature, they re- quire fuch manifeftation of it, as is moft agreeable to the nature of a reaſonable crea- ture, and a free agent; a creature ſenſible of dependency, and capable of acknowledging it. And how can this acknowledgement be made, but by homage and obedience of fome kind? and all homage and obedience, of ne- ceffity imply fome reftraint of natural liberty. And, fince fome reſtraint of natural liberty was neceffary, in Adam's cafe; what reſtraint could be more eaſy, than a reſtraint of his appetite from one fruit, amidſt an infinite variety of others no lefs delicious, and poſ-. fibly many, perhaps all of them, more fo? And, at the fame time, what reſtraint could be more worthy the wifdom and the good- nefs of God, than the prohibition of a fruit, which he knew would be pernicious to his creature? AND probably it was for this very reaſon, that the tree of knowledge was placed in a diſtinguiſh'd fituation, in the midſt of the garden. For I have already fhewn, that if a dependence upon God was for Adam's inte- reft, a conftant fenfe of that dependency muſt be fo too; and how fhould that be better kept up, than by fome remarkable memorial before REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 89 before his eyes? And what could more na- turally contribute to make fuch a memorial remarkable, than a very fingular and diftin- guiſhed fituation? And if fome reftraint of Adam's liberty was neceffary, in manifefta- tion and acknowledgement of dependency; and God in his wifdom thought fit to place that reſtraint upon fome indulgence of appe- tite, which would be pernicious to him; (for that there was no neceffity of fuch moral reſtraints, in that ſtate of things, as are now found expedient, is fufficiently evident) could any thing better become his wifdom and goodneſs, than to place the object of that ap- petite in fome place fo diftinguiſh'd, as to prevent all poffibility of miſtaking that fruit for any other? AND as to its being a perpetual object of temptation; for my part, I have no idea of any Being placed out of the reach of tempta- tion, but God alone. All created beings have of neceffity limited powers; and are of ne- ceffity, limited in the uſe of theſe powers; and, if every thing not granted, be a re- ſtraint, every creature in the univerfe is re- ftrain'd; and, as fuch, every angel, of every order, muſt be in the midſt of temptations, even in the midſt of heaven. But at the fame time, furely all thofe creatures muſt be inexcufable who, when God hath given them every thing neceſſary for their happineſs, will yet 90 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. yet repine if they have not more; and dif- obey where they are not indulg'd. And therefore the conduct of Almighty God, with relation to the reſtraint laid upon Adam, however liable to exception at first fight, yet will, upon a thorough enquiry, be found to flow from the inexhauftible fountain of his infinite wiſdom and goodneſs. As to the particular objections urged in the letter to Dr. Waterland, the learned and ingenious author could, I am fure, had he thought fit to take the other fide of the queſtion, have given them clear and folid folutions; he knows very well, that God neither diſcarded nor difinherited his fon, tho' he chaſtiſed his diſobedience; and that fuch chaſtiſement may be (and, upon the Chriſtian ſcheme, was) the effect of infinite wiſdom and goodneſs in the author; that the curfe upon Adam, and the earth, was the effect of mercy, not fury; to make a tempo- rary life, and a vexatious world, leſs defire- able to him; that tho' his happineſs was im- pair'd, yet neither his hope nor his inheri- tance were cut off; and that obedience left him ſtill in a capacity of recovering more, than all that difobedience had forfeited. BUT yet if, notwithſtanding the manifeft equity and benignity of the divine conduct on this occafion, this acute author cannot fee how REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 91 how it can be acquitted of feeming injuftice, and unreasonable feverity, I judge him not: to his own mafter he ſtandeth or falleth; but I earneſtly with him to remember, that the wifeft of mortal beings may too eaſily be blinded by vanity: and drawn into the greateſt abfurdities, in defence of a favourite hypotheſis. BUT 'tis objected, (by the fame writer, p. 18, 19.) that God can make nothing in vain, yet paradife was fo; fince it was no fooner made than forfeited, and, like a theatrical ſcene, changed in an inſtant to a profpect of mifery and barrenneſs. Is then every thing made in vain that is tranfitory? and did paradife vaniſh in an in- ftant? and do the fcriptures warrant us to believe fo? quite the contrary. But fup- poſe it to have lafted but one day; the Ephe- meris's whole life, and end of exiſtence, is fully compaffed in a lefs fpace; and yet the infinite wiſdom and almighty power of God, are as amply manifefted in the formation of that infect, as in the whole apparatus of paradife ! 'tis evi- SUPPOSE it lafted but a day, dent, that the whole ſcheme of our redemp- tion is built upon the tranſactions of that day: and is that vain and unworthy of God? and are 92 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. when are you fure it is? and can you prove it to be fo? O arrogance of vanity! are the times and feaſons in our hands! and is it ours to fay and how long! Muft our ideas of duration and eſtimates of fitneſs determine Him, with whom a thousand years are but as one day, and one day as a thouſand years! Wife fon of Sirach, how juft is thy reflection! wiſdom is far from * pride. BUT Cicero tells us, "that the common opinion of all philofophers is, that the deity "can neither be angry nor hurt any body; cc r how would he have been furprized then, "to find God reprefented here, as fierce and enraged, driving out his own creatures in cc anger, and, in a kind of fury, curfing "the very earth for their fakes!" > I ANSWER, That whatever Cicero might have thought of Alexander's dream, the ve- neration I bear to his memory, will never allow me to believe, that he could have treated Mofes's account of the ferpent's fpeaking, as a fubject of ridicule. I mean, if he had well weigh'd, if he had throughly and candidly confider'd it in all its circum- ftances; tho', I own, it is neither eafy nor fafe to fay, what that mortal's exceffive vanity and manifeft ignorance of the true nature of God, might infpire him to do, who could think fo weakly and unworthily of the Ruler of the world, as to imagine him incapable of punifhing iniquity; if, in truth, he did ſeriouſly think fo. AND whereas this writer would have us believe, that Jofephus had but a low opi- nion of Mofes's divine infpiration, from fome very temperate expreffions of that hiftorian's upon this head; This objec- tion REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 97 tion will, I think, vaniſh, to any man of fenfe that confiders when that Jew wrote, and to whom, that he might with good reaſon think it expedient to abate from the rigour of truth, in fome inftances: the better to foften and accommodate what he had to fay, to the prejudices of his readers. For that he thought juftly, that is, highly, of the divine miffion of Mofes, a late learned writer hath fufficiently made appear, from ſeveral other parts of his writings; (fee the reply to the defence of the letter to Dr. Waterland.) Tho', if this proof could not be produced, and Jofephus were juftly liable to fufpicion in that point, 'tis evi- dent, no mighty advantage could be drawn from thence in favour of infidelity; fince, 'tis very poffible, (as fome learned men have obferved) he might, at that time, have been opprefs'd with doubts and difficulties, from the difappointment of his people, in the completion of thoſe pro- phecies relating to the Meffiah, (which were to be fulfilled about that time) in the fenfe and manner their ſelfiſh vanity fuggeſted. WHOEVER Confiders this feriouſly, will furely find little credit or conviction in oppofing any quotation from him, to the conftant united fenfe, of fo many great and wife men, of fo many different nations and interefts, thro' ſo vaſt a ſeries of centuries. H DIS- 98 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. DISSERTATION VII. Some farther difficulties relating to the fall confidered. T The ſerpent's fentence con- fidered. HE way being thus clear'd, I now proceed to anfwer fome other difficulties that ariſe on this head As, ift. IF this fentence upon the fer- pent, was defign'd for Adam's confolation, and as a stay of hope, that his feed fhould deftroy the power of fatan, and be restored to the favour of God, Why was it fo obfcurely delivered? I ANSWER, That it was deliver'd in fuch a manner, as fufficiently fuggefted to Adam, a reaſonable hope of recovering in his pofte- rity, what he had loft in his own perfon; and more evidence than this, neither the wiſdom nor the goodness of God exacted; eſpecially, fince this obfcurity rather tended to REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 99 to raiſe his hopes, than to deject him; for when Adam heard that the feed of the woman was to deftroy the evil fpirit, he undoubt- edly underſtood Eve to be that woman; and fome iffue of his, by her, to be that feed. This naturally tended, to revive him into a lively hope of the ſpeedy reſtoration of his loft eſtate and as naturally tended, to efta- bliſh a thorough reconciliation between him and his wife; becaufe, without fuch a re- conciliation, their hopes could not be com- paffed. Whereas, without this motive of amity, fome contention on this occaſion had been inevitable; and poffibly, the feud might otherwiſe have been carried on, to their mutual deſtruction; nay, probably, without this, the particular puniſhment de- nounced againft Eve, would have made her cold in the bufinefs of a reconciliation; and, perhaps, to fuch a degree, as totally to pre- vent it; eſpecially, when it muft naturally begin with fubmiffion and patience on her part, who had been the caufe of her huf- band's calamity. Now that they had lively hopes on this head, at leaft, enough to fupport them in a right fenſe of religion, appears from Eve's exultation at the birth of Cain: I have got- ten a man from the Lord, fays fhe, i. e. I have gotten. a man thro' the fignal favour and mercy of God. Now this extraordinary H 2 exul- 100 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. exultation cannot be fuppofed to arife from the fenfe of the bare privilege of bearing iffue; for that privilege fhe had in common with the meaneft brutes; which he could not but know before this time; and there- fore her tranſport muft arife, from fome pro- fpect of fome extraordinary advantage from this iffue; and that could be no other than the deftruction of her enemy. AND fuppofing Abel to have been born after Cain had attained the age of manhood, as poffibly he might; and after the hopes of Eve had languiſh'd, by obſerving the per- verfe difpofition of her firft fon: Her difap- pointment in theſe hopes, was, probably enough, the reafon why fhe called her fecond fon Abel, i. e. Vanity; concluding, from the little profpect fhe had, in that per- fon, on whom ſhe had fixed her hopes, that no child of hers fhould be the promiſed ſeed; and therefore it was vanity to expect it. But as Cain's perverfenefs, and untowardly dif pofition, was probably the reaſon why ſhe defpair'd of his being the promiſed feed: and, in that ſpirit of defpair, called her next fon's name Vanity; from the infirmity ufual with parents, to believe, that no fon can equal the firft; fo there is reaſon to be- lieve, that upon Abel's difcovering a better difpofition, as he grew up,and being afterwards accepted by God, in preference to his elder brother, } REVELATION Examin'd, &c, 101 brother, her hopes again revived, that he was the promiſed feed. This appears highly probable, from her declaration at the birth of Seth; And she bare a fon, (faith the text) and called his name Seth; For God, faith fhe, hath appointed me another feed instead of Abel: Becauſe (for fo it is in the original) Cain flew him. From hence, 'tis evident, that he took Abel to be the feed, till Cain flew him; and afterwards, when the found that God had given her another fon, diftin- guished from thoſe then in being, by this remarkable character, that he was begotten in the likeness of Adam, and after his image, i. e. framed with that appearance of all thoſe advantages which Adam derived from the hand of God, far above any of his fons; (for this is the only rational interpre- tation of the text) fhe then concluded, that this was certainly the feed; and that God had given him to her to effect that, which Abel would have effected, if he had not been cut off by his brother. Thus we fee, that the obfcurity, in which it pleaſed God to foretel the deftruction of the evil ſpirit, gave rife to a fucceffion of happy hopes in the breaft of Adam and Eve: who, if they had known that this happineſs was to be poftpon'd for four thousand years, would, in all probability, have inevitably fallen into the extremity of deſpair. H 3 IF 102 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. IF it be ftill ask'd, How the denunciation of enmity betwixt the feed of the Serpent, and the feed of the woman, is fulfilled? For firft, If I ANSWER, Every way. you take the text in the figurative fenfe, we know that as good men are in the fcriptures called the children of God, fo wicked men are called the children of the devil. And we have but too much proof of the impla- cable enmity of this wicked race againſt the feed of the woman to this very day. And if we had no other proof, their reftlefs refift- ance to the cleareft evidence on this head ; the neceffity they lay us under of proving the fame truths over and over again, a thouſand different ways, would fure be a fufficient demonftration of it. OR if the text be taken in a literal fenfe, we ſee a ſtrong antipathy fubfifting between ferpents and mankind to this day. Nay, this antipathy is fo ftrong, that, as the juices of the ferpent are noxious to man, fo Ariftotle affures us, that the human juices are noxious to ferpents: His expreffion, on this occafion, is very remarkable; he tells us, that the human faliva is hoftile to ferpents; an expreffion fo full, and pointed to the accompliſhment of this fentence, that, if he had not wrote it more than three hun- dred REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 103 dred years before the birth of Chrift, he had certainly been treated by our adverfaries as a fworn accomplice with Chriftians, to prove the ftrict completion of it: So fully do this great man's obfervations verify the very let- ter of the fentence here denounced! So fully is this fentence executed in every ſenſe! If you take it in the figurative fenfe, our adverfaries themſelves evince the accom- pliſhment of it: If you take it in the lite- ral fenfe, this enmity is, proved by the teftimony of the moft accurate obferver of all mankind, who cannot eaſily be fufpected of confpiring with Chriftians to manifeft the completion of it. BUT does the ferpent feed upon duft? I ANSWER, Moft infallibly. Nor, per- haps, could he otherwife fubfift in thoſe fandy and dufty defarts to which God has, in a good meaſure, condemned him; tho' commentators content themfelves with ex- plaining this part of the fentence, from the neceffity he is under of eating his food on the ground, and fo fwallowing duft with it; but if this is thought, by fome, not fuffi- ciently to diſtinguiſh the curfe of the fer- pent from the natural condition of other creatures, it fhould be remember'd, that a further and more diligent enquiry affures us, that he actually eats the dry, dufty earth. H + 104 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. + ( earth * And there is not the leaft reafon to believe, that any other beaft in the world. does feed in the fame wretched manner, except the fcorpion; who is alfo accounted, by Celfus, a kind of ferpent. Nor is the point fo clear in relation to the fcorpion; tho' out of all doubt with regard to the fer- pent. So ftrangly is the fentence of God executed in every fenfe, and in every part, to a tittle! AND as the expreffion of licking the duft, fignifies, according to the Hebrew idiom, the loweſt ſtate of depreffion and humilia- tion to which an enemy can be reduced; 'tis not improbable, that this metaphor was taken from that ſtate of dejection and degra- dation, to which the ferpent was now re- duced in the prefence of Adam: And doubt- lefs God funk the ferpcnt into this abject condition, at that time, as a fignificant em- blem to Adam of that utter proftration and ſubjection, to which his evil inmate fhould be finally doom'd, by the feed of the woman; at that dreadful day, when (as the Pfalmift prophefied of him) his enemies fhould lick the duft, Pf. lxxii. 9. the AND thus, having explained to you all parts of the fentence pafs'd upon the fer- * See Bochart and Pliny of ferpents. pent, 3 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 105 pent, with the furprizing accompliſhment of it in all; I now proceed to expain the fen- tence paſt upon the woman at the fame time; which is as follows: UNTO the woman he faid, I will greatly multiply thy forrow and thy conception; in forrow WO- The man's fentence confidered. thou shalt bring forth children: and thy defire Shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee. SOME part of this fentence may perhaps now ſeem no way ſtrange to us, who every day, fee every part of it accompliſhed. And yet, a more accurate obfervation upon the condition of all other creatures, will make the accompliſhment of it aftoniſhing, to every man that thinks: and therefore, to clear this prophecy of pain to the woman, we muſt obſerve, that it confifts of two parts; firft, the pain or forrow of concep- tion, or breeding: And fecondly, the pain of childbirth. As to the firſt of theſe, 'tis. remarkable, that a woman is the only crea- ture under heaven, that we know of, which has ordinarily any forrow in conception *.--- *This Ariftotle exprefsly affirms, and only excepts the in- ſtance of a mare conceiving by an afs; and, in general, where there is any thing monftrous in the fœtus. And, doubtlefs, the cafe is the fame where the foetus fuffers from any acci- dental hurt or diſtortion in the matrix. If 106 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. If it be ask'd, How it can be known, that other creatures have no fickneſs on the fanie occafion; I anſwer, That we can judge of the fickneſs and health of brutes, by as fure indications, as of our own; tho' not always fo certainly, in what part their diftempers are feated. And to put us out of all doubt in the prefent cafe, we know, that other crea- tures are in more perfection of health, and ftrength, and habit, after conception, than before. Whereas, 'tis the reverfe of all this with womankind. How miferable their con- dition ordinarily is, on that occafion, is fufficiently known to every human audience. Ariftotle mentions about ten vexatious ma- ladies, of various kinds, which await them in that ſeaſon of fickneſs: And Pliny begins his account of that matter in thefe very re- markable words: Headachs, vertigos, mifts before the eyes, a loathing of food, &c. are the indications that a man is begun. And as he begins it remarkably, he concludes it no leſs fo, by obferving, that the end of all this vexatious toil, is frequently defeated by the fnuff of a Candle. MORE than this; as if all the fingular mifery of that wretched ftate, were not fuf- ficient, the woman's conceptions are multi- plied. She is remarkably fubject to abor- tions and falfe conceptions above all other animals REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 107 animals in the world: And when her con- ceptions come to maturity, there is remark- ably a greater mortality of her iſſue, than of that of any other creature; at leaft, one half of her off-fpring perifh, before they can an- fwer the ends of their being; that is, before they attain the age of feventeen years: And as her grief on thefe occafions, is more ex- ceffive than that of any other creature, in the letter of the fentence, Her forrow and her conceptions are greatly multiplied, before fhe anſwers the ends of Providence and ſo- ciety. And to crown all, fhe brings her off-fpring into the world (which was the ſecond part of the punishment denounced againſt her) with remarkably more pain than any creature upon the face of the earth. And if Ariftotle, the beft obferver in the world, did not affure us of this (as he does) our own obfervation could not fail to do it. Nay, common fenfe muft teach us, that if other creatures creatures were expoſed to equal pain and danger on thefe occafions, all our care would fcarce be fufficient even to preſerve the feveral fpecies in being; and much leſs to preferve them in any number fufficient to anſwer the feveral ends of life. So fingularly, fo emphatically true is that part of the woman's puniſhment al- fo, 108 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. ſo, in forrow ſhalt thou bring forth chil- dren * Now I would ask every candid and rea- fonable man upon earth, How this comes to paſs? They will not, I prefume, arraign Almighty God of incapacity to form woman in more perfection, or fubject to lefs infeli- city in this point; and, if they will not, 'tis evident that unleſs all this infelicity be the effect of a curſe, and in puniſhment of guilt, human nature is unequally dealt by: In a word, this mifery muft be the effect either of hard treatment, or juft puniſhment; there is no medium. Now the infinite goodnefs and perfection of the Divine Nature will not fuffer us to fufpect him of the former imputation; and therefore all this mifery muft demonftrably be the effect of a curfe; a juft curſe upon Eve, entailed by her on her daughters. AND here I muſt once more put a plain queftion to our adverfaries, as I already did on another occafion, and may perhaps have more occafion to do, in the courfe of theſe enquiries. Do they know, that this mifery, which awaits women in conception *This is the more remarkable, inafmuch as feveral circum- ſtances in her make, naturally promiſe more eaſe to her, in this cafe, than to any other animal. and < REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 109 and child-birth, is demonftrably the effect of a curfe! If they do not know it, I muft own, I cannot yet think them the wifeft men in the world: but if they do know it, and yet deride Chriftians for believing it; the glory of being the wickedeft, can, I think, fcarcely be contefted with them *. The latter part of the woman's fen- tence confi- dered. AND the fubfequent part of her puniſhment is in the fame analogy: Thy defire, or, (as it is in the original) thy appetite Shall be to thy husband, and he fball rule over thee, i. e. forafmuch as you have indulged yourfelf in this inftance, without the advice or confent of your huf- band, (which furely fhould not have been done in a point of fuch importance) you fhall from henceforth depend upon the will { As this offence of eating the forbidden fruit introduced irregularity of paffion and appetite; and particularly, that appe- tite which is to this day moft predominant in human nature, it pleafed God to leave this memorial of it upon the woman, who was first in the offence. Now that it had this effect, ap- pears, as from other proofs, fo, I think, fully and clearly from the covering which Adam and Eve made uſe of ſoon after their offence, for there is no imaginable reafon for that cover- ing, but one; and that one fufficiently demonftrates, that irre- gularity and violence of appetite, independent of the dominion of reafon, was the effect of their offence. And forafmuch as this offence began in Eve, what could be a more proper puniſhment of it in her, or a more certain memorial of that puniſhment to the end of the world, than the miſery which ſhould attend the indulgence of that appetite in herſelf, and in her daughters, from generation to generation? of 110 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. of your husband, and he fhall have domi- nion over you. And, I believe, they, who are moſt concerned in this puniſhment, (and furely a fevere puniſhment it is, to have their wills perpetually fubject to the will of others) will not deny, that they feel the fevere effects of it over the face of the whole earth at this day. AND that this fubjection in the woman, is the effect of a curfe, confequent to that of- fence which wrought our fall, is evident: Becauſe, on fuppofition that human nature were in a ſtate of perfection, where reafon ruled, and perverfenefs had no place, there feems to be no imaginable reafon, why one ſex fhould be in fubjection to the other. And accordingly we find, that the woman was given at firft under no other character, but that of a companion; becauſe it was not good for man to be alone; nor did Adam confider her under any other character: for, when he excuſes his offence to Almighty God, by charging it upon his compliance with Eve, he fays, The woman, whom thou gaveft to be with me, she gave me of the tree, and I did eat. - The woman, whom thou gaveft to be with me, i. e. whom thou gaveft to be my affociate and companion, without the leaft hint of fubjection, or dependency. Nor was there the leaft reafon REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 111 J reafon for any in that ftate, as I fhew'd be- fore. The fen- tence paffed upon Adam. I COME now, in the laft place, to the fentence denounc'd upon the man; which needs little explication. He is doom'd to a condi- tion of perpetual flavery, for obeying his wife, rather than his Maker; the earth is curfed for his fake, and (inftead of the de- licious fruits of paradife) he is doom'd to eat of it in that accurfed ftate: and confined to the herb of the field, in common with the brutal herd; till death reduce him to the common duft, from which he was form'd. THE wiſdom, the goodneſs, and the juftice of God are fufficiently confpicuous throughout this whole fentence; more efpe- cially in theſe three inftances: Firft, IN decreeing, that toil and drud- gery ſhould be the confequence of departing from an eaſy and a rational obedience: which hath been the curfe and punishment of all his pofterity, in every inftance of dif- obedience to their Maker, from that day to this. Secondly, IN making the earth lefs defire- able to man, when his guilt had reduced him to a neceffity of leaving it. And that alfo 112 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. alſo is yet done in the train of calamities and ficknefs, which for the moft part makes life a load, before its laft period, and death defirable. AND thirdly, In keeping thofe appetites and paffions which had now broke loofe from the reſtraint of reafon, within fome bounds, by fubduing their impetuofity with hard labour; which unfubdued, or fup- ported in luxury and idlenefs, would run riot; and make himfelf, and every body about him, miferable. As it is ſeen among his fons at this day. AND, to preclude man from all poffibi- lity of reverfing any part of this fentence, we are affured that he was, foon after this, fent out of paradiſe, and debarr'd from the tree of life. This caution the wiſdom and goodneſs of God exacted; forafmuch as, when fin had entail'd calamity and corrup- tion upon human nature; in that condition, to perpetuate life, would be to perpetuate mifery. AND now, upon the whole, What is it that infidelity hath to object, with any de- gree of clear unprejudiced reafon, againſt this account of the creation and fall of man? Was he created in that condition, and under thoſe circumftances, which the trueft wiſdom REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 113 wiſdom, muft, upon the beft principles of philoſophy, the cleareft dictates of reaſon, and the fulleft conviction of experience, pronounce upon the whole, moft eligible, and moft advantageous? And what would he more? If the wifeft man that ever was born into the world, had his own fituation and cir- cumftances of exiſtence in his choice, could he form to himſelf a wifh beyond the ad- vantages of Adam in paradife? To come into the world, in the full vigour of ftrength, health, and reafon; with a foul fuperior to the tyranny, or even the temptation of appe- tite; and a body impaffible to the inju- ries of weather! privileged from diſeaſe and death! unincumber'd with cloaths, and yet unconſcious of fhame, the companion of guilt! encompaffed with all the delights of ſenſe, and filled with all the joys of inno- cence! fo very happy, as not to be ac- quainted with evil! a circumftance which human wiſdom would have deem'd a defect: and confequently, a condition of happineſs, which nothing but infpiration could teach! above the invention of the greateſt genius that ever was born into the world! MAN, without fin, was without mifery; tied to no more toil than reafon, and ufe, and a philofophick enquiry into the nature I of 114 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. of things exacted ; free from all vexati- ous remembrances of the paft, or anticipa- tions of future evil! Nothing but hap- pinefs, in poffeffion, or in profpect! a whole creation fubmitted to his dominion, and en- fured to his pofterity! an inexhaustible fup- ply of entertainment for every organ of fenſe, and every faculty of foul! with one companion, to fhare, and double every en- joyment; and both, as fully furniſhed with means to communicate happineſs, as fitted to receive it, without any interruption from mortal infirmities, or allay from paffion and perverſeneſs. A SCENE! where the prefent vanities of life could have no place; where palaces (the inventions of pride and infirmity) would be but incumbrances upon earth, and inter- ruptions from heaven! where pomp and pageantry, could they be conceived, muft at the fame inftant be defpifed; deſpiſed for what they are, fpecious folly ! O Adam, beyond imagination happy! un- interrupted health! untainted innocence! nor perverſeneſs of will, nor perturbation of appe- tite! a heart, upright! a confcience, clear! a head, unclouded! a glorious world, an univerſe, —to contemplate! to enjoy! And the Author of that univerfe, the fource of all exiſtence; his God, his Creator, his REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 115 to blefs, to glorify, to his Benefactor, adore, to obey. AND now, What have mortal vanity and weakneſs to object to this condition, and this account of the firft man? fince it is evi- dent, that if man ever came into the world, he muſt come into it, under moſt of theſe circumftances: - and if ever he came into it, in a way entirely worthy of infinite wif- dom and goodneſs, he muſt come into it, under them all. THIS was a creation, and a ftate of things, worthy a God; and this account of his creation, worthy of a writer infpired by God; inſpired to convey it, in all that fimplicity and ftrength, and in confequence of both theſe, that fublimity of ftile, that beſt became a being, who knew his works above embelliſhment! the fubject fupported its own dignity, and was incapable of any acceffion from human wifdom, or the arts of eloquence; and all the exceptions that ever were, or ever will be made to it, will in the end be found the effects of human blindneſs and depravity; the neceffary con- ſequences of that very fall, (of Adam) which we all feel, and yet have the folly and the front to diſpute, BUT why did he fall from this felicity? I 2 Ask 116 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 1 • ASK rather, vain man, Why he was a creature? Why he was dependent of his Creator? And why he was ameneable to him? Had he been incapable of error, and fuperior to temptation, he had been God; had he been independent, he had been and had he been unac- no creature; countable, he had been irrational, and independent; and could we ſuppoſe fuch an abfurdity, as an independent crea- ture, can we imagine it would be a happy circumftance of exiſtence, to an intelligent being, of limited powers, to be exempted from the guidance, and protection, of infi- nite wifdom, and unbounded power? And if duty and dependence be the neceffary con- fequences of creation, muft not chaſtiſement or annihilation, be the neceffary confequence of disobedience to the commands of that great Being that governs the world? And is not any penalty, lefs than annihila- tion, an act of mercy? And is not a new trial, under a capacity of recovering more, even by an imperfect obedience, than was forfeited by a deliberate diſobedience, an act of the higheſt mercy imaginable *? BUT } *And that this is the cafe of Adam, and all his defcendants, can be no doubt with any Chriſtian of an enlarged mind; who believes Jefus Chrift to be the Lamb flain for the fins of man- kind, from the foundation of the world. For why he should be con- REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 117 -1 BUT how could Adam fall, by eating an apple? TELL me rather, arrogant queftioner, (whoever thou art) How he could fall otherwife? Could he fall but by difobe- dience? and where could he diſobey but in relation to fome reſtraint of natural liberty? And is there a created intelligence, whoſe natural liberty fhould not be reftrain'd? And what natural liberty fhould our firft parents be reſtrain'd in, except that, where indul- gence would be fatal? Should they not be reftrain'd from their own deftruction? Had moral reftraints, ftrictly speaking, (the idle objection urged by infidels *) any place in paradife? Moft certainly they had not. How then could man be in more per- fection than now? Was not this an act of intemperance? and as weak a one as any of his poſterity hath fince fallen into? I ANSWER, It was intemperance; but it was more intemperance of knowledge, than confidered as flain from the foundation of the world, unleſs his death was of univerfal uſe from that period, is, to me I own, inconceivable; and I am very fure that St. Paul's epiſtle to the Romans juſtifies me in this opinion. * See the conference with a theift, Raleigh's Hift. I 3 and Sir Walter food: ' 118 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. food: A circumftance fingly fufficient to eſtabliſh the credit of the Mofaic hiftory; for tho' Mofes is fhort upon the fubject; yet, whoever confiders the point, with any com- prehenfion, will find that Adam and Eve were inacceffible, at leaft impregnable, to temptation, any other way. They can fcarcely be imagined capable of one wifh without their reach, except that of wisdom: And the intemperance of that very wifh (which infidels have urged as an argument of infirmity equal to ours) is to me, I own, a proof of fuperior perfection; for know- ledge, is always defirable, in proportion to the light and extent of the underſtanding that feeks after it; and therefore every fuperior degree of intelligence, fhort of infinite, muft have proportionably a fuperior defire of knowledge. This the tempter well knew, (probably, by woful experience) and adapt- ed his wiles to this infirmity, with admirable addrefs. He faw Adam and Eve every way fuperior to the brute world, (and I am perfuaded the very brutes were not then unruly in their appetites) and therefore a temptation to them (Adam and Eve) from mere appetite (could any have been offer'd) had been a weakneſs contemptible in a mere ferpent? but a temptation to be made like This rightly contidered, the allegorical interpretation of the ferpent's being the fymbol of pleaſure, c. will be found altogether fenfelcts and abfurd. to REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 119 to God in knowledge, was a temptation to excellence, which no limited intelligence could be proof againft, (and muft always be ftrong in proportion to the extent of that in- telligence) and what could be fo ftrong a delufion, to hope this from the fruit of a tree, as Eve's feeing a brute become rational, as fhe thought, by the vertue of that very fruit? And that this was the cauſe of her delufion, I have already proved, to the evidence of an axiom. AND doubtlefs the ftrength of this delufion, was a main reafon with their Creator, to receive the laps'd pair into mercy; notwithſtanding their deliberate vio- lation of an exprefs command, immediate- ly given them by himfelf; a circum- ftance, which, without abatement from the greatneſs of the temptation, had ren- dered their difobedience utterly unpardon- able. UPON the whole, What What can make more for the truth of any revelation, than that every real difficulty, every feeming abfurdity, every tittle objected to it by infidelity, is found, upon a full enquiry, to be a new evidence and confirmation of its truth? I 4 LET 1 120 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. LET infidels then object, and let be- lievers be undiſmay'd! (I had almoſt ſaid, Let them rejoice) in full affurance, that every objection to the truth of divine revelation, will end in new evidence for it. DI Se REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 121 DISSERTATION VIII. Of Sacrifices. HE next interpofition of the Divine Being, which we meet with in the Scriptures, is, in the cloathing of Adam and Eve; and foon after follows an account of his acceptance of Abel's offering, and his non-acceptance of Cain's ; from whence men have been generally led to believe, that facrifices were of divine inftitution. Let us then examine what evidence can be collected, either from fcripture or reafon on this head, and then fee, whether they both lead to the fame conclufion. IN Hebrews xi. 4. the author of that Epiftle tells, that by faith Abel offered unto God a more excellent facrifice than Cain, by which he obtained witness, that he was righte- ous, 122 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. ous, God teftifying of his gifts; and by it, he being dead, yet fpeaketh. 1 Now the facrifices here referred to, are evidently thefe, of which Mofes gives us ſome ſhort account in the fourth chapter of Genefis, where he tells us, that in process of time, Cain brought of the fruit of the ground, an offering unto the Lord. And Abel, he alfo brought of the firflings of his flock, and of the fat thereof. And the Lord had respect unto Abel, and to his offering: but unto Cain, and his offering, he had not respect. He then proceeds to tell us, that, upon this pre- ference, Cain was very wroth, and his coun- tenance fell. And the Lord faid unto Cain, Why art thou wroth? And why is thy coun- tenance fallen? If thou doeft well, shalt thou not be accepted? And if thou doeft not well, fin lieth at the door. In theſe words it is plainly implied, that Abel acted well, i. e. righteouſly, in the buſineſs of his facrifice; and that Cain acted not well, i. e. unrighteouſly, in the buſineſs of his facrifice; and that in confequence of this defect, fin lay at his door. Now this righteouſneſs in Abel, by which he obtain'd the preference to his bro- ther, the apoſtle afcribes to his Faith. Br REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 123 By faith Abel offered unto God a more ex- cellent facrifice than Cain, by which he ob- tained witness, that he was righteous, God testifying of his gifts. HERE we fee, that, according to the fcripture account, the firft act of worſhip, which God accepted with open marks of ap- probation, from the foundation of the world, was a facrifice; in which the life of one of his creatures was devoutly offered up to him: and that what made it acceptable, was the faith of the offerer; by which he obtained an atteftation from God himſelf, that he was righteous. In this account of the preference of Abel to Cain, are contain'd two points of doctrine, which are remarkably the objects of ridicule with the infidel world, above all the other duties of religion, that ever were enjoined un- der the Jewish or Chriftian oeconomy. THE firft is, that facrifice was from the beginning acceptable to God: and the next, that faith made it fo. FOR fome think nothing more abſurd, than to imagine, that God could ever be gratified or appeafed by the deftruction of his creatures. And, if this action could not in 124 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. I ! in its own nature, be acceptable to God, How could faith make it fo? Now, to clear theſe objections, which, I own, are plaufible, let us firft enquire how far reafon can evince, that facrifices were of divine inftitution; and fecondly, what light the fcriptures give us on that head ; and if both theſe evidently lead to one conclu- fion, our laft enquiry muft be, what ends were intended by Almighty God, to be ferved by this inftitution. I. THEN, I am to enquire whether rea- fon evinces that facrifices were of divine infti- tution. And in order to clear this, we muft have recourſe to one plain principle; or, in other words, to a plain truth, which no candid reader will, I believe, conteft; which is this: THAT whatever practice obtains univer- fally in the world, for any confiderable number of years, muft obtain in it, either from fome dictate of reaſon, or fome demand of nature, or fome principle of intereft, or fome powerful influence or injunction of fome Being of univerfal authority. Now, that facrifices obtained univerfally, for many ages, over all the regions of the known world, I believe, will not be denied by REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 125 by any man, who makes the leaſt pretence to the knowledge of antiquity. And, that the practice did not prevail from any dictate of reafon, the adverfaries of revelation will, I believe, readily own; it being evident, that unprejudiced reafon never could dictate, that deftroying the beft of our fruits and creatures, could be an office acceptable to God, but quite the contrary. Alfo, that it did not prevail from any demand of na- ture, is undeniable: for, I believe, no man will fay, that we have any natural inftinct or appetite to gratify, in fpilling the blood of an innocent, inoffenfive creature upon the earth; or burning his body upon an altar. Nor could there be any temptation from ap- petite, to do this, in thofe ages, when the whole facrifice was confumed by fire; or when, if it were not, yet men wholly ab- ſtained from fleſh; as there is all the reaſon in the world to believe, that, at leaſt, the re- ligious part of them did for the firſt fixteen hundred from the creation. And con- years fequently, this practice did not owe its origin to any principle of intereft; and fo there could be no prieft-craft in the cafe, during that period. Also in after ages, the duty of facrificing belong'd to the father of the family; who was more intereſted in the well-being of it, than any other perfon whatſoever; and con- 126 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. confequently, could have no intereft in creating an unneceffary expence. And after this, when fathers grew up into princes, by the increaſe of their families; the prieft- hood, we know, became an appendage of royalty and facrifices were then alfo at the facrificer's own expence. WE alfo know, that libations, and offer- ings of feveral kinds, were the conftant practice of private men in their own fami- lies; and that priefts had no perquifites from them; nor can they, with any colour of reaſon, be fufpected to have had any emolument of any kind, from this practice, in any region of the earth, till more than two thousand years, from the firft inftitution of this rite. Tho', if they had, 'tis evi- dent, that the advantages derived upon any particular ſet of men, from any practice, is far from being a proof, that fuch a practice had no original foundation, but in the ſub- tilty and intereft of that particular ſet of men. In truth, the ſuppoſition is as abſurd, as any thing can well be imagin'd; and will affect every profeffion under heaven, as well as the priesthood; from the prince upon the throne, to the meaneft officer and artizan in the common-wealth. Nay, in truth, will affect every profeffion in the world, much more than the priesthood: becauſe, that is the only profeffion, which was origi- nally REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 127 nally difintereſted, in the diſcharge of duty proper to it. WE own indeed, that orators in Rome, did plead the cauſes of their clients, in the flouriſhing ſtate of the common-wealth, without any fuch fees as are now paid to pleaders amongſt us, on like occafions: but this by no means clears them, either of the fufpicion or proof of being mercenary in that conduct; becaufe, that, was the fure and known way to the highest honours, and moſt profitable employments in the common- wealth. But the father of the family can- not be fo much as fufpected of having any intereft of any kind, in leffening his own power, by leffening his own property, in the bufinefs of facrifices; which was indif- putably the cafe. And therefore, the prieſt- hood, is the only profeffion in the world, which is clear of all fufpicion of intereſt in the buſineſs of its profeffion, for more than two thouſand years from its firſt inſtitution at leaft, if the priesthood be allow'd as old as facrifices and if it be not, 'tis plain that facrifices are not the invention of prieſt- craft. ; AND this obfervation fhould, methinks, make any infidel, who had any remains of modefty, bluſh for fuch infults upon any order of men, as are demonftrably founded in 28 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. in ignorance and untruth. Since it is de- monftrable, that, if facrifices were the in- vention of prieſt-craft, prieſts practiſed their craft, to their own fole detriment, for more than two thouſand years; which furely was a very ſtrange kind of policy. And, if fa- crificcs be two thoufand years older than priefts, certainly it were fomewhat hard to place the invention of them to the ſcore of prieft-craft. SINCE then facrifices are demonftrably not the invention of prieft-craft; nor the dictate of reafon, nor the demand of nature ; I fhould be glad, that infidels would fo much as attempt to tell us, with any colour of reafon and proof, how they prevail'd fo univerfally in the world, otherwiſe than from divine appointment? How any practice could obtain in the world, to which man- kind, were neither urged by the intereſt and fubtilty of any particular fet of men, nor by any dictate of reafon, nor by any inſtinct or demand of nature, nor by any intereft of any kind; but quite the contrary, in direct contradiction to every principle of reaſon, and nature, and intereft; (for the deftruction of innocent and ufeful creatures, is againſt reafon, againſt nature, and againſt intereſt): I fay, how fuch a practice could prevail, and prevail univerfally, is impoffible to be accounted for, but from fome powerful and irre REVELATION Examin'd, &c, 129 frreſiſtible influence of example, or injunction of authority. And what example could have fuch influence, except that of Adam, or what authority could have fuch power, ex- cept that of God, is to me, I own, utterly inconceivable. IF you fay, fuperftitions prevail unac- countably in the world; I anfwer, That all fuperftition has its origin in true religion; and may, for the moſt part, be eaſily traced up to its true fountain. All fuperftition is abuſe; and all abufe fuppofes a right and proper ufe. The very idea and definition of fuperftition, is, a fuperftructure of extrava- gance, and folly, and falfhood of ſome kind; and all fuch fuperftructures neceffarily fup- poſe fome foundation of regularity, and rea- ſon, and truth. This is the cafe even of little particular fuperftitious practices of par- ticular times, and places: but where any practice is univerfal, there it must demon- ftrably have ſome univerfal cauſe. And that, as I have fhewn you, can be no other in the cafe before us, but either God, the founder of the world, or Adam, the founder of the human race; from whom it was derived to all his pofterity. Ir infidels fay this practice is from God, they then give up the point in difpute; if they fay, from the firft father of mankind, K (which 130 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. (which is the only thing that can be ſaid with any colour of reafon) the queſtion will ſtill recur, Why Adam practiſed a rite fo cruel, and fo contrary to reafon and nature? Or why he ſhould propagate a practice to his pofterity, which he could not but know, would be fo detrimental to them, as the re- gular, annual deftruction of the very prime of all the creatures, that would be moft ufe- ful to mankind, to the end of the world? WE fee, indeed, that fome parents are now, weak, and wicked enough, to encou- rage their own vices and extravagancies in their iffue; (tho' the greater part, even of weak and wicked parents, take the quite contrary courfe): but then, where they do countenance their own faults and follies in their children, it always is, in fuch inftances, as carry pleaſure, or profit, or advantage of fome kind along with them; and the reaſon of this is not hard to be difcern'd. Some- times they think the practice of their chil- dren, a plea for the fame practice in them- felves; at other times, they are urged to this conduct, from the hopes of conveying the pleaſures, or profits, or advantages of thofe practices to their children, without the evils they themſelves fuffered from them: they flatter themſelves, that their iffue, warn'd by the example of the father's miſcarriages, may obtain every thing defirable in their iniquity, with 3 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 131 with more fecurity: but facrifice was fuch a practice, as, unleſs enjoin'd by the authority of God, muft of neceffity be detrimental; without any profpect of pleaſure, or profit, or advantage of any kind. And therefore, unleſs Adam was worſe than an ideot, it was impoffible he could enjoin his poſterity ſuch a practice, from any other motive than di- vine authority: or, if he had, it is unimagi- nable why they ſhould univerfally obey him, from any other motive; unleſs they alſo were ideots for two thoufand years fucceffively. Which furely it will ill-become the advocates for the ſtrength and ſufficiency of human rea- fon, to admit. - Nay this is not all: for it will follow, that the Egyptians, and Greeks, and Romans were likewife worfe than ideots, in their turn; that the whole heathen world were brutes and monfters for two thouſand years more, in the practice of this very rite: Nay, they actually are fo, to this day. In a word, either this rite had fome foundation in true religion, which fway'd the whole world to the practice of it for four thousand years, and yet ſways the heathen part of it to this day; or elfe, this boafted principle of reaſon, which could fuffer men to go on in a train of fuch abfurdity, and barbarity, for four thoufand, nay, for fix thoufand, years toge- ther, is a very bad and infufficient guide. One of theſe pofitions, is indifputably true; if the latter is admitted, then revelation was abfo- K 2 132 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. abfolutely neceffary, to reform and to inſtruct the world, at the time that Jefus Chrift came into it: if the former, then facrifices were of divine inftitution. Which was the thing to be proved. Let the adverfaries of revela- tion, take which fide of this dilemma they like beft. AND thus, having feen how far reaſon evinces facrifices to be of divine inftitution, I now proceed to enquire what light the ſcrip- ture gives us upon that head. AND first, I fhew'd you, in the introduc- tion to this differtation, that God gave Abel fure proof of his acceptance of his facrifice; and alſo gave teftimony of his having done well, in that act of adoration. And from hence I clearly infer, that facrifices were of divine inftitution. For, 'tis certain, that the deftruction of an innocent creature, is not, in itſelf, an action acceptable to God; and there- fore, nothing but duty could make it accepta- ble: and nothing, but the command of God, could make it a duty, in the cafe before us. We know, that no being has any right to the lives of the creatures, but their Creator, or thofe, on whom he confers that right and 'tis certain, that God had not yet given man a right to the creatures, even for neceffary food; and much lefs, for unneceffary cruelty. And there- 3 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 133 therefore, nothing, but his command, could create a right to take away their lives. 'Tis alfo evident, that killing an innocent. creature, cannot, in its own nature, be pro- perly faid to be doing well. And therefore, fince Abel is acknowledg'd by God to have done well, in killing the firſtlings of his flock in facrifice, 'tis evident, he muſt have done this, for fome very good and juſt reafon; and what reafon could juftify him in doing it, but the command of God? In truth, no action is juft or good, other- wife than as it is conformable to the will of God, either reveal'd, or eftablish'd in the nature of things: And that this action was conformable to the divine will, could only be known by revelation, i. e. by being com- manded. And therefore the rectitude of it, in Abel, could only arife from obedience. And, that obedience could juftify it, can be no doubt to any man, who knows, that obe- dience is more acceptable with God than facri- fice; and to hearken, than the fat of rams, I Sam. xv. 22. AGAIN; the apoftle affures us, that Abel offer'd a more excellent facrifice than Cain, by faith: And what this faith is, he explains in ſome following inftances. For example, he tells us, that Noah prepared the ark, by faith: K 3 134 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. faith; that Abraham, by faith, left his own country, and went not knowing whither; and that Sarah, by faith, received ftrength to conceive feed. Now we know, that Noah built the ark by the expreſs command of God; and with affurance from God, that he, and his houfe, fhould be faved from that deftruction, which was coming upon the reſt of the world. We are affured, that Abraham left his country and kindred by the exprefs command of God, and went into a country, which God had affured him, he fhould receive for an herit- age. What was then the faith of Noah, and the faith of Abraham, but obedience to the commands of God, and a firm truft and confidence in the affurances he gave them, however ſeemingly improbable and unlikely to be fulfilled? And what was Sarah's faith. but a firm dependence upon God, for the performance of a promife, naturally impoffi- ble to be fulfilled? And can we have any doubt that Abel's faith alfo confifted in obe- dience, and an affurance of being acceptable by that obedience, tho' in an act of duty, otherwiſe moſt unlikely to be pleafing to God? as that of the deftruction of his inno- cent creatures, certainly was. An action, than which, nothing could be, more, in appear- ance, ill fitted, to appease the divine wrath, or obtain the divine favour. And yet, a ready 2 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 135 ready obedience to that great Being, who commanded it, made the action and the actor righteous. And 'tis evident, nothing but fuch a faith, as prompted Abel to that obedience, ever could make fuch an action acceptable to God, in any man whatſoever, from the foun- dation of the world. BUT here it may be objected, that Abel's facrifice might be accepted, merely because he was a good man; and Cain's rejected, because he was an ill man. I ANSWER, That as this is a fcriptural fact, we have no way to judge of it, but from the lights left us in the fcripture. Now, from the accounts left us of facrifices in the fcripture, we find, that offerings of fruits, were facrifices of thanksgiving; and offerings of creatures upon the altar, were facrifices of atonement for fin; (nor were fruits accepted in atonement, except in cafes of extreme poverty, Lev. vk.) Now 'tis evident, that all men have fins to be atoned, as they have divine favours to be ac- knowledged; and that atonement fhould naturally precede acknowledgment, as the foundation of all other religious duties fhould be laid in repentance; fince no office of devotion, can be acceptable be acceptable with God, without a precedent refolution of amend- ment in the offender; from hence it was, that K 4 136 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. that by the Mofaic law, confeffion was to pre- cede the trefpafs offering, Levit. v. If Men expect to be accepted of God, they muft offer the facrifices of righteousness; and there is no righteouſneſs without repentance. Now Abel, tho' a better man, offer'd fuch a facrifice, as plainly implied a confciouſneſs of guilt, which called for atonement; and con- fequently, his, was a facrifice of repentance; confeffing guilt, and imploring pardon; and as fuch, was accepted of God. Whereas Cain, tho a worfe man, expected to be ac- cepted, without repentance, or atonement. And this feems to me very clearly implied in God's anſwer to him; If thou doeft well, shalt thou not be accepted? and if thou doeft not well, fin lieth at the door; i. e. If you are righteous and unfinning, you fhall be accepted, as fuch, without facrifice; but if you are unrighteous, fin lieth at your door, and muft lie there, till it is removed by repent- ance and atonement, (doubtlefs, fuch atone- ment as God himſelf had before appointed.) But it may be farther objected; If Mofes knew that facrifices were originally inftituted by God, with manifest marks of acceptance, as in the cafe of ABEL, Why did he not give a clear, diftinct account both of the infti- tution, and the manner of acceptance? * I AN- REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 137 1 I ANSWER, Becauſe fuch a relation was unneceffary. The Jews, to whom he wrote, knew very well, that their own facrifices were of divine inftitution; and that God mani- fefted his acceptance of them, upon the firſt folemn oblation after that inftitution, by mi- raculous fire from the divine preſence, as we read in the 9th chapter of Leviticus; and they could have no reaſon to doubt, that they were fo inftituted, and fo accepted from the beginning. Nor needed they to be then in- formed of a truth, which, doubtleſs, a clear, uninterrupted tradition, had long made fami- liar to them. BESIDES this, there is reafon to believe, that this rite was loaded with many additional ceremonies, at its fecond inftitution, under Mafes; in order to guard the Jews, from the infections of the heathen in this point; and therefore, it might not be proper to explain the matter more fully, to a rebellious people: who might think themſelves ill ufed, by any additional burden, of trouble, or expence, in this practice; however really neceffary to their well-being. AND thus, having fhewn, both from rea- fon and fcripture, that facrifices were origi- nally inftituted by God, I proceed, in the next place, to enquire what ends were in- tended 138 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. tended by Almighty God to be ferved by this inftitution. Now the true way to judge rightly of the wiſdom of any inſtitution, eſtabliſhed at any certain time, is, to confider what was neceffa- ry, or expedient to be done, on fuch an oc- cafion. And if the inftitution is found to be well and wifely fitted, to anſwer the exigences of the occafion, then we may ſafely pronounce fuch an inſtitution, wife, and well appointed. WHEREAS then, reafon evinces, that facrifices were inftituted by God; and the ſcripture fhews this to have been done foon after the fall: therefore, to judge rightly of the wif dom of this inftitution, we ſhould enquire, what was neceffary to be done, as things then ftood, between God and his creatures. And this will be beſt known, by enquiring, what was the condition of his creatures at that time. In the first place then, we know, that Adam and Eve, were now, finners: receiv'd into mercy; but in danger of relapfing. Surely then it was neceffary, that they fhould have a fenfe of their guilt, and of the mercy fhewn them; and that they fhould be guarded againſt the danger of relapfing-In the next place, 'tis certain that they had forfeited their lives, by their tranfgreffion: and if ſo, was it not neceſſary, they ſhould be minded of the forfeit they REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 139 they had made, in order to a juſt and grateful fenfe of the goodnefs of God in remitting it? They were alſo now, naked, and infirm: both decency and health required that they fhould be cloathed.- They were alfo doom'd to die, and to molder into duft; as a puniſh- ment of their fin. 'Twas furely fit they ſhould know the nature of their punishment, in order to judge from thence of the heinouſneſs of their offence; and in order to be better pre- pared to undergo it.More than all this; God knew that they were to beget children, who fhould inherit their own corruption, and in- firmity. And certainly 'twas fit, that they alſo, ſhould be early deterr'd from fin; and have early monitions of the goodneſs and mercy of God. ALL this was evidently expedient to be done at this time: (as ſhall be ſhewn more at large immediately); and if all theſe purpoſes of wiſdom and mercy could be effectually at- tain'd by any one inftitution; certainly, that inſtitution, muft needs be wife, and well- appointed. Now we find one inftitution ap- pointed about this time, and but one; viz. that of facrifices. It remains then that we now carefully enquire, whether any, or all thefe ends could be attained by that inftitu- tion. AND 140 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. " AND in order to do this more clearly, I muſt remind you, of what I obferved in a former differtation, that a fenfe of dependence upon God, was for Adam's intereft, even before the fall: and that fome memorial of it, was ne- ceffary, in manifeſtation of that ſtate; and in order to keep up a conſtant ſenſe of it, in his mind. Now if a fenfe of dependance upon the fupreme Being, was neceffary in a ſtate of innocence and perfection; furely much more in a ſtate of guilt and infirmity: when the guidance, affiſtance, and reſtraint, of infinite wiſdom, and almighty power, were much more wanted. In a ftate of perfection, fuch a memorial of dependance was evidently moſt proper for Adam, as was beft fitted, to mind him, at once, of the felicity of that happy ſtate in which God had placed him, and the danger of lofing it. To this purpoſe, the tree of life, and the tree of death, were both plac'd full before his eyes; in a very diftinguiſh'd and remarkable fituation; as a fure and conſtant monition, that God, had placed life and death in his own choice; and that his happineſs, and mifery, depended wholly upon himſelf. WHEN man had forfeited his life, by his tranfgreffion; and God, notwithſtanding, de- creed to receive him into mercy; nothing cer- tainly could better become the wiſdom and goodneſs of God, than the eſtabliſhment of fome inftitution, which might, at once, be a moni- tion REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 141 tion both of the mercy of God, and the puniſh- ment due to fin; And forafmuch, as God knew that man would often fin; and fhould often re- ceive mercy; it was neceffary, that inftitution fhould be fuch, as might frequently be re- peated; and in the repetition, frequently re- mind man, of his own endleſs demerit, and the infinite goodneſs of God to him. AND what inftitution could do this more fully or more effectually than that of facrifice for fin? facrifice for fin plainly teaching theſe two points. It, THAT every fin was a forfeiture of the offender's life; And, 2dly, THAT notwithſtanding this, God would however have mercy on the finner; and accept of fome other life, as a ranſom, in lieu of that forfeiture. 1st, I fay, this inftitution, plainly taught, that fin was a forfeiture of life. For when it directed that a life fhould be paid down upon every tranfgreffion, what could be a clearer do- cument from fuch an inftitution, than that life was the forfeit of tranfgreffion? Now if life be actually the forfeit of tranfgreffion, in every offender againſt God, 'tis evident, that an in- ftitution, which carries that document with it, is, fo far, well and wifely appointed: on every occafion, 142 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. occafion, that ſuch a forfeiture happens to be made. And, that life is the forfeit of every offence againſt God, is evident; forafmuch as being muſt manifeftly be beftow'd, upon rea- fonable creatures, under condition, of obedi- ence to their Maker: Nor is it imaginable how God could beftow it otherwife. And if being is beſtowed on condition of obedience, 'tis evident thac difobedience forfeits it. For, as God form'd intelligent creatures, for the attainment of happinefs, in conformity to that excellent order of things, which he fo admir- ably eſtabliſh'd for the well-being of the whole: 'twas a neceffary confequence, from the wiſdom of that eſtabliſhment, that all voluntary de- liberate departure from that order, fhould be a forfeiture of being. For otherwiſe, it wou'd follow, that creatures had a right to continue in being, for reafons, directly contrary to thoſe, for which they were firſt form'd; i. e. for reaſons inconfiftent with wiſdom and goodneſs: which is abfurd :—but at the fame time, that reaſonable creatures, evident- ly forfeit their being, by diſobedience, yet cer- tainly God may, if he pleafes, continue it to them, for the fame reaſons, for which he firſt conferr'd it; i. e. for the manifeftation of his wiſdom and goodnefs. And fince he deter- min'd to continue it to man, after his offence, nothing could be more reaſonable, than that he fhould continue it, under fome memorial of his own mercy, and man's demerit; for if there REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 143 there were no memorial kept up of the heinouf- neſs of his offence, guilt would, from that moment, have no terror. And if guilt once loft its terror with men, corruption would quickly carry them on to endleſs enormity; and then, man would continue in being, for ends, directly contrary to thofe, for which he was preferved by the divine mercy, from the death which he had incurr'd: (which the wif dom and goodneſs of God could not allow :) And on the other hand, if there were no affurance of forgiveneſs, after tranfgreffion, the effect would be the very fame; for defpair, would drive men, to the fame extremes of tranigreffion, to which impunity would tempt them. And therefore, both the wiſdom and the goodneſs of God, neceffarily required fuch a memorial of mercy, on this occafion, as fhould at the fame time ſtrike fure terror into guilt: and what memorial could do this more effectually, than that, which demonftrated life to be the fure, fix'd forfeit of every offence? and fince facrifices are fitted to effect this, beyond any thing we know of, 'tis evident, that the wif- dom and goodneſs of God are fo far juſtified, in the inſtitution of them, at this time. IN the next place, Adam and Eve were now, not only naturally, but indecently, naked: 'Tis evident then in the first place, that decency requir'd they ſhould be cover'd; And befides this, the inclemency of the air, added to the infirmity 144 REVELATION Examin'd, &c infirmity of nature which fin had introduced, had now made cloathing neceffary: fince otherwiſe their life muft foon have become miferable; or rather muſt foon be deftroy'd, without fome better protection, than that of a few leaves. And fince this exigence would likewiſe be fully anſwered by facrifices, which would yield them covering, from the skins of the creatures fo flain; this alfo is a new evi- dence of the wiſdom of God in this inftitution. Nor is there the leaft reafon to doubt, that the cloaths made for our firſt parents, by divine appointment, immediately after the fall, were of the skins of the creatures offered up to God on this occafion; for there is no reaſon to ima- gine, that any of the beafts, which were juſt made in perfection, ſhould die fo foon; or would naturally die in many years after their creation. Nor was there any neceffity that God fhould flay them for that fole end, when all the ends to be ferved by their death would be fully anſwered in the ſingle inſtitution of facrifice: which I have now fhewn, and will yet farther fhew, to be in other refpects wife and well appointed, at that very time. To pro- ceed then, WE learn, from the command given, and the ſentence denounced againſt Adam, that death was the penalty of his diſobedience: and fince it was fo, certainly it was highly pro- per that he ſhould know what he was to fuffer; REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 145 fuffer; and confequently, that he ſhould fee death in all its horror and deformity; in order to judge rightly of the evil of difobe- dience (and in order to be better prepared to undergo it). And what could fhew this evil, more ſtrongly, than the groans and ſtruggles of innocent creatures, bleeding to death for his guilt, before his eyes, and by his own hands? Sights of this kind, are fhocking to humanity even yet; tho' cuftom hath long made them familiar; with what horror then may we imagine they pierced the hearts of our firſt parents? and how was this horror aggravated, when they confider'd themſelves, as the guilty authors of fo much cruelty to the beings about them? For NOR is this all; this inftitution was yet more extenfive in its influence. fince early impreffions of the danger and horror of guilt, are the beft fecurities againſt fin; nothing furely could be better fitted, to fix thefe impreffions deep in the minds of children, than the fad neceffity of fhedding blood, introduced by fin: which it was eaſy for a prudent parent, to inculcate, and im- poffible for a pious parent, not to inculcate, on every occafion of killing the creatures, in atonement for guilt. Efpecially when he himſelf felt all that horror of iniquity, which he would impreſs upon his children, on that occafion. And therefore this infti- L tution, 146 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. tution, was not only wife and neceffary, with regard to Adam and Eve, but admi- rably contriv'd, to convey an early abhor- rence of fin, into the minds of their off- fpring, from generation to generation. ADD to all this, that Adam was to be yet farther informed of death: and to this pur- pofe, when the groans and ftruggles of the dying animals were over, what ghaftly and fad fights muſt the dead eyes, and cold car- cafes of the creatures, yield him, before they were placed upon the altar; and in their afhes after? How difmal a meditation muſt it be, to confider the beauty and excellence of animate beings, reduced to a handful of duft? And what a fhocking lecture of mor- tality, muft the remains of thofe creatures read to our firft parents, in their ſeveral gradations, from corruption to duft? efpe- cially, when they could not fee them in that fad condition, but under the full affurance, that they themselves muft follow the fame odious fteps to deftruction. AND is it poffible to conceive how God could ftrike the human foul, with more fenſe of mifery from guilt, or more abhor- rence of the fad cauſe of that miſery, than by this conduct? Such abhorrence of guilt, and fuch a loathing of life, that if the mercy of God had not caufed fome ray of hope REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 147 hope to fhine thro' this fcene of mortality and mifery, 'tis not to be imagined how Adam and Eve could bear their being; and therefore there feems to have been an abfo- lute neceffity, that when facrifices pierced the heart of man, with fuch dread, and deteftation of guilt, and mifery, they should at the fame time be feals to fome covenant of mercy, from God. THAT God entered into a covenant of mercy with man, immediately after the fall, is evident from the fentence paſt upon the ferpent in which, a covenant of mercy is neceffarily implied. And can we doubt that facrifices were the feal of that covenant? eſpecially when mercy is fo plainly implied in the very nature of the inftitution; which teaches, that tho' life be the forfeit of fin, yet God will, in mercy, accept another life in lieu of the offender's. AND fince reafon evinces the neceffity of fome covenant of mercy at this time, Can any man in his fenfes doubt the truth of thofe fcriptures, which give us clearly to underſtand, that it was made? (How far the facrifices then offer'd, were types of Jefus Christ, the Lamb flain from the foun- dation of the world, is the bufineſs of another enquiry). We find that God's ufual way of ratifying covenants of mercy with man- kind L 2 148 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. kind in after ages, was by facrifices; And can we imagine, that he fail'd to do ſo, when fuch mercy was more wanted, than ever it was fince the foundation of the world? and when fuch an eſtabliſhment is demonftrably one main reaſon of the very inftitution of facrifices? Is it to be imagin'd, that God ſhould take care of the health of our parents bodies on this occafion, and take none of the peace of their minds? Is it to be imagin'd, that God, ſhould ſoon after this, fhew fo much folicitude for an hardened murtherer, for fo vile a wretch as Cain: and take none now, about two unhappy delin- quents, oppreffed with mifery, and at the point of defpair? Had he fo much mercy, foon after, upon one man; and would he have none now upon the whole race of man- kind, yet in Adam? BUT here it may be objected, that when the fleſh of animals was not eaten, their carcafes were of no uſe; and fo there was no detriment to mankind in flaying the creatures for facrifices; at leaft, if they might preferve their skins for cloathing, &c. I ANSWER, That fuppofing the skin not deftroyed in facrifice, (as it certainly was in fome cafes under the law, and probably was fo before), yet the deftruction of the crea- tures REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 149 tures was of manifold detriment; for as veft- ments of hair and wool, ſoon ſucceeded the ruder coverings of skins; the annual growths of all fuch creatures, as could be fhorn, were of great emolument, even in the early ages of the world; efpecially to that part of mankind, which led the paftoral life, and dwelt in tents; and we find that Abel's facrifice, was of creatures of this kind: and, 'tis probable, that creatures of other kinds, were as ufeful in cafes of carriage, as now, and more demanded; as the invention of more convenient vehicles hath now made a lefs number neceffary for that purpoſe: nor is it improbable, that they were alfo of fome ufe in tillage; efpecially, fince that occupation began, as early as Adam: many of them alfo might, for ought we know, be uſeful for food: for milk might be eaten, when flesh was not; their very carcafes might be of as much uſe in culture, then, as now; they might alſo be the food of neceffary domeftick animals; or the food of creatures of carriage, as at this day among the Arabs. nay, AND this fuggefts another reafon for the inftitution of facrifices, viz. that fin fhould not go unpuniſh'd; but ſhould always be attended with fenfible inconveniency. And the damage men fuffer'd, in the creatures deſtroy'd in facrifice for fin, was doubtleſs, L 3 at 150 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. at all times, a confiderable inconveniency; eſpecially after the flood. Nor let any man regard thefe damages as trifles, fince they were fuch, in many cafes, as wife legiflatures have put in ballance with a human life. THE only difficulty now remaining, is, whether a command to deftroy the lives of innocent creatures, be confiftent with the divine goodneſs and mercy. BUT this will be no more a difficulty, when we confider that their fubferviency to the ends of human life, is, as far as we can fee, the fole end and purpofe of their being; and that it is their happineſs, upon the whole, to be fubmitted to the dominion of man; and to be deſtroyed for his ufes; fince they are by this means preferved from weather, from want, and from one another; and re- lieved under diſeaſes and diftreffes of every kind: and forafmuch as only a certain num- ber of them can fubfift conveniently toge- ther, 'tis evidently their intereft to be deli- vered by fudden deftructions, from more lingring and cruel deaths. AND thus, having fhewn, that facrifices were of divine original; that faith only could make them acceptable to God; and that many ends of infinite wifdom and mercy were, at once, ferved by them: 3 having REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 151 having alſo fhewn, that there was an appa- rent neceffity of God's making fome cove- nant of mercy with Adam at this time; and that it is highly credible, he did fo; I ſhall, with God's affiftance, enquire in due time, how credible it may be, that the death of Christ was figur'd in that covenant; and was neceffary to the redemption of the world, in confequence of it. In the mean time, I cannot, without in- dignation, reflect, upon the blind and info- lent vanity, of thoſe wretched mortals, who with fuch blafphemous and fhocking teme- rity, fet themſelves to ridicule every inftitu- tion of God, which the corruption, or narrow- nefs, of their own heads and hearts, hath made them incapable of comprehending, Whereas, a very moderate degree of under- ftanding, enlighten'd by a very moderate degree of learning and reflection, would naturally, and almoft neceffarily, teach them, the adorable wisdom and goodneſs of every fuch inftitution: or, if it could not, yet a very fmall portion of humility, might teach them, that every inftitution of God, must be wife and good; tho' poffibly above the reach of poor fhort-fighted mor- tals. The leaft grain of humility could not but teach them, the infinite diftance and dif- parity between their own little, narrow, groveling conceptions, and that infinite ex- L 4 tent 4 152 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. tent of knowledge, effential to the high and mighty One, that inhabiteth eternity: who hath affured us by the mouth of his holy prophet, that his thoughts are not our thoughts, neither our ways his ways. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, fo are his ways higher than our ways, and his thoughts than our thoughts. To whom be glory for ever and ever, Amen, DĮ Se REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 153 DISSERTATION IX. Concerning that corruption and degene- racy of mankind, which drew down the divine judgment in a deluge. N the fixth chapter of Genefis, and the third verfe, we find God ſpeaking in this manner, con- cerning the corruption and de- pravity of mankind: And the Lord faid, My fpirit fhall not always frive with man, for that he also is flesh; yet his days fhall be an hundred and twenty years. THESE words contain the determination of the divine juſtice, upon God's inſpection of that univerfal corruption which had over- ſpread the earth, fome time before the flood. THE methods he had hitherto taken to deter man from guilt, and to draw him to good, 154 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. goodneſs, were now experienced to be in- effectual (nor let any man quarrel with this way of speaking; fince, 'tis evident, that the best methods of infinite wifdom, not controuling the liberty of free agents, may be defeated, or perverted, by degene- rate beings, given up to the corruption of their own hearts, and the violence of un- ruly appetites): it remain'd then, that one method more fhould be taken for their amendment. Noah, a preacher of righteouf- nefs, is appointed to denounce the divine vengeance againſt their vileneſs, and to affure them, that the fpirit of God would not always ftrive with them, in the gracious methods of mercy and monition; but would proceed to wrath and vengeance, if they did not forfake their wicked courfes; and had now determin'd to allow them no more than a trial of one hundred and twenty years. In which time, if they did not amend, re- nounce their vilenefs, and return to their duty, they fhould be deftroyed by an utter and final excifion from the earth. This is the common fenfe of commentators upon the place, and, the then ftate of things throughly confidered, will, I believe, be found the most natural and proper interpre- tation of the words above recited. As to the methods of mercy which God had taken for the amendment of man- kind, REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 155 kind, before the flood was fent to deſtroy them, I fhew'd you in fome former differtations, that a Seed was promiſed immediately after the fall; who ſhould fubdue and deſtroy the power of that evil fpirit, which had brought fin into the world: a victory which could neither be attained or enjoyed without enmity to evil, and attachment to good, This naturally tended to inſpire all wife and good parents, with a ftrong zeal of training up their children, with the utmoft exactnefs, in all the ways of religion and virtue; fince all their hopes, both for themſelves and their children, depended upon this rectitude of difpofition; without which, it was impoffible that any of them, could be the promifed feed; who was to reſtore the hu- man race, to their original purity and per- fection. I ALSO fhew'd you, that foon after this, facrifices were inftituted by Almighty God; as a means admirably fitted to inſpire man- kind with a horror of guilt; and be at the fame time a perpetual memorial of the divine mercy, from generation to genera- tion. BESIDES this, Adam liv'd to teach and to exhort his children, nine hundred and thirty years and Lamech, the father of Noah, who 156 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. who died on the very year that God brought the flood upon the earth, was thirty years old when Adam died: and fince we know from the fcriptures, that Lamech was a pro- phet, there is no doubt but he alfo, as well as his fon, was a preacher of righteouſneſs, to mankind; till their fins drew down their deftruction. And from this fhort account of that period, we may fairly collect, that the world never wanted either wife inftitutions, or authentick teachers from God, to keep them in their duty, or deter them from evil, from the creation to the flood. ADD to all this, that there is good reaſon to believe, that God exhibited himſelf to mankind, at that ſeaſon, by fome fignal manifeſtation of his prefence; as afterwards in the tabernacle, and temple. This feems fufficiently implied in Cain's com- plaint, of being driven from the divine pre- fence, upon the murder of Abel: for we can- not, with any fhew of reafon, believe him ignorant, that God was effentially prefent every where. And therefore, when he fays, Thou haft driven me out this day from the face of the earth, and from thy face fhall I be hid; 'tis evident, that as by the earth, he only meant that particular region of the earth where Adam then dwelt; fo, by the words thy face, he muft only mean that peculiar, gracious exhibition of his divine pre 1 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 157 prefence, which he there vouchfafed to mankind. AND this very baniſhment, with that mark wherewith God had branded him as a murder- er, was a fignal monition to the whole race of Adam, that vengeance from God ſhould purfue fin. And as he was banished from that region where his father dwelt, 'twas a neceffary con- ſequence of his exile, that he carry'd the fame monition to his own pofterity; and preferved it, in whatever region of the earth he fettled after this time; i. e. he carried it to that region, i.e. where it is certain, it muſt have been moſt wanted, as being moſt remote from the au- thority and influence of Adam. And as Cain's puniſhment, was, at this time, a fignal deter- ment from vice, fo Enoch's exaltation to hea- ven, afterwards, (which from the reaſon of the thing and character of the man, doubtlefs was done in a very glorious and confpicuous manner), was the nobleft exhortation to piety and virtue, that can be imagined. And, at the ſame time, a fure document to the world, that God had ample rewards in heaven for the righteous, fuch as eye had not feen, nor ear heard, neither had entered into the heart of man to conceive. THUS much is obvious to be inferr'd, from the account left us in fcripture, of the methods of mercy and monition made ufe of by the divine 158 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. divine wiſdom and goodneſs, for the amend- ment of mankind, before the earth was over- whelmed with a deluge: but as that account is very fhort, 'tis poffible there might have been many other methods made uſe of to the fame purpoſe, and probably there were; tho' 'tis certain, that even thofe recorded in the ſcriptures, are abundantly fufficient to vindicate the ways of God with man, during that period. BUT when all theſe gracious methods, monitions, and exhortations, (whatever they were) were in the end found ineffectual, for the amendment of the world: I believe it will not be denied, that there was then a necef- fity of a new revelation, (in the uſual courſe of God's dealing with the fons of men) antece- dent to the utter deftruction of this degene- rate race: both to manifeft his mercy, and to vindicate his juſtice, in the government of the world; to make it fufficiently evident to all fucceeding generations, that no means were left uneffay'd for their amendment; and that nothing, but the laft neceffity, compell'd their Maker, to proceed to extremities with his crea- tures. Whereas then, Mofes reprefents man- kind, as in the laſt degree of degeneracy, before they were deſtroyed by the flood, and at the fame time, reprefents Almighty God, declaring that his Spirit ſhould not always contend with them, but that however he would yet bear with them, for an hundred and twenty years; nothing REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 159 nothing furely can be more reafonable, than to conclude from this account, that God gave them certain notice of his fix'd intention to deſtroy them, at the end of this period, if their amendment did not avert the judgment. And that he did fo, is fufficiently imply'd in that paffage in St. Peter's Epiftle, where Noah is ftil'd a preacher of righteousness; added to the fubfequent incidental obfervation, that the people of that period of time were difobe- dient, when the long ſuffering of God waited while the Ark was preparing: this being con- fidered, I think we can have no reaſon to doubt, that Noah was a preacher infpired by the fpirit of God, to warn the old world, of the divine vengeance hanging over their heads, at that time. HAVING thus explain'd the full fcope and intention of the divine declaration men- tion'd at the beginning of this differtation, I now proceed to enquire, ift, By what means human nature became fo corrupt, in ſo ſmall a ſpace; i. e. in a fuc- ceffion of fo few generations as paffed from the creation to the flood? corrupt to fuch a degree as to lay God under a neceffity of deſtroying them. 2dly, To enquire by what means that ca- lamity was brought upon the earth. And, 3dly, WHAT 160 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 3dly, WHAT ends of the divine wiſdom and goodneſs were anſwered by it. ift, THEN, I am to enquire how it was poffible for mankind to become fo utterly cor- rupt, in a fucceffion of fo few generations, as pafs'd from the creation to the flood. AND here I must own, that it is indeed fcarcely imaginable, at first fight, how man cou'd be fo corrupt, under all the reſtraints from evil, and incitements to good, which God made ufe of to keep him within the bounds of duty, during that period. And yet the influence of the firft tranfgreffion, will, upon due reflection, but too well account for all this enormity. As man is a being, made up of body and fpirit, the one, paffive and fenfelefs, the other, active and intelligent: 'tis evident the perfection of his nature, muft confiſt in the ſubjection of the body, to the dominion of the fpirit: i. e. in a fubordination of his organs and appetites to the dictates of right reaſon. It follows then, that, if, by any misfortune, the powers of his underſtanding ſhould be impair'd, or thoſe of his appetites inflam'd, he muſt from that mo- ment become an irregular, imperfect creature; inafmuch as the ballance muft immediately turn in favour of the inferior appetites; which would often influence him to act in oppofi- tion REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 161 tion to reafon. And that either, or both thefe effects might be produc'd by eating the for- bidden fruit, I have already fhewn: AND as the indulgence of the appetites naturally tends to weaken the intellectual fa- culties, by taking off the mind from intellect- ual objects, and immerfing it in matter, and fenfual purſuits; it feems a neceffary confe- quence from this condition, that man, left to his own liberty, or unreftrain'd by fome very extraordinary degrees of divine grace, muft naturally degenerate into the laft degree of corruption. And what reſtraint confiftent with human freedom can be imagin'd fufficient to check his unruly appetites, in that height of vigour, and confidence of long life? If all the dictates of reaſon, and terrors of religion, are unable to withhold men from blafphemy, and violence, and villainy, even now,under all the diſcourage- ments of a ſhort and wretched life, rarely, and with great difficulty ftretch'd out to a ſpan of 70 years; what can we conceive fufficient to keep them back, in the ſtrength and fecurity of fin, for a continued feries of eight or nine hundred years? No interpofition of provi- dence can be imagin'd fufficient for their amendment in theſe circumftances: unleſs it were fuch, as would either change their nature, or deſtroy their freedom; and therefore 'tis M but 162 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. but too credible, that in about 1500 years. from the creation, God found them degene- rate to ſuch a degree, as if they had been mere brute beafts; for that feems the moft natural fenſe of the text ;-My Spirit fhall not always Strive with man; for that he alfo is FLESH, i. e. 'Tis in vain to ufe any more methods of mercy, or monitions of wiſdom with man, who is now entirely given up to fleſhly appe- tites; and is by that means funk down into the loweft condition of brutality And foon after, Mofes affures us, that God faw that the wickedness of man, was great in the earth; and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart, was only evil continually. And this alfo is eafily apprehended. For as the van- quifh'd, naturally become flaves to the conque- ror, fo here, all the powers of the mind, being fubdued to the dominion of the appetites, ſerved now to no other purpoſe, than to pur- vey for the pleaſure of their tyrants; and mini- fter to all their unruly demands. THIS extreme degeneracy, made it neceffary to Almighty God, to root out the whole race of mankind from the earth, except one man and his family: which family, being yet but young, were preſerved from that degeneracy, by the example and influence of a righteous parent for we are affured, that Noah was a just man and perfect in his generations; and Noah walked with God, Gen. vi. 9. 3 Now REVELATION Examin'd, &c, 163 Now this deftruction of the human race was, at once, an act of the higheſt juſtice and mercy. For, fince God made man for ends worthy of his own infinite wifdom and good- nefs; and fince, by their difobedience and degeneracy, they had utterly defeated the ends of their creation; lived only to purpoſes di- rectly contrary to thoſe ends, and wholly de- ſtructive of them; liv'd only to rebellion and difobedience to their Maker, and their own mutual mifery and deſtruction; nothing could better befeem the mercy and the juftice of God, than to cut off that corruption by an utter excifion, which neither his reftraints, nor rewards, nor all the monitions and ex- hortations of his prophets, added to his own declarations, inftitutions, inflictions, and de- nunciations of vengeance, could reclaim, in the courſe of ſo many centuries. By what gradations men arriv'd to this height of corruption is not fo clear from the ſcriptures; yet may, with much appearance of truth, be collected from them; For be- fides the general expreffions in which Mofes defcribes this degeneracy, there are two that ſeem to point out particular vices; both men- tion'd in Gen. vi. 11. The earth alfo was corrupt before God; and the earth was filled with vio- lence; by violence is plainly meant cruel- ty, and outrage, and injuftice of every kind : M 2 and 164 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. and by corruption, the Jews tell us, is always meant either idolatry, or abominable and un- lawful mixtures and pollutions. And that the latter is here meant, is evident from this fub- fequent explication of thofe words: for all fleſh had corrupted his way upon the earth. The queftion then is, by what means both theſe corruptions came into the world? Now, THE first inftance of iniquity we meet with after Cain, is in Lamech, the fixth in defcent from him, inclufive. He introduced the corruption of polygamy into the world; which could not fail to introduce many others; fuch as murder, adultery, and unna- tural luft: As is eafy to be conceived, and fhall be fhewn more at large hereafter. And it is highly probable that he made his way to that crime by the murder of the husband or fpoufe of one of his wives. This is not un- naturally collected from the very nature of his crime, added to that bitter exclamation of his to his wives in] Gen. v. Hear my voice, ye wives of Lamech, hearken unto my speech; for I bave flain a man to my wounding, and a young man to my hurt: From hence 'tis evi- dent, that he had committed murder (one mur- der at leaſt, if not more) and what cauſe ſo probable for his doing fo, as the gratification of his luft: eſpecially in an age of the world when there ſeems to be little occafion of con- tention for any property, but that of women: 3 The REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 165 The earth not being yet peopled, and the crea- tures doubtless in great plenty; And why fhould he call fo emphatically to his wives, and complain to them under that particular character, unless they had, in that particular character, been fome way or other the occa- fion of that crying guilt? and how they, as wives, could be the occafion of that guilt, without any guilt of their own, (which they are not charged with) is not eafy to be ima- gined upon any other fuppofition. AND this conjecture is ftrengthen'd by reflect- ing, that there was an apparent neceffity that mankind fhould at firft be propagated in a re- gular fucceffion of male and female, at leaſt in equal numbers of each fex: and in that cafe, no man could pretend to a plurality of wives but by doing a manifeſt injury to fome other: nor is it likely, that other would fub- mit to fuch an injury without force. That Lamech had ufed force againſt fome other man is evident; as alfo that he thought himſelf much more criminal in doing ſo, even than Cain: as appears from that exclamation (which, I think, hath not yet been rightly underſtood) If Cain fhall be avenged feven-fold, truly La- mech ſeventy and ſeven-fold;—Now the true reaſon why God mark'd Cain, and guarded him from deftruction, under fo fevere a penal- ty upon any one that fhould flay him, was de- monftrably this; that he might preferve him M 3 as 166 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. as a living monument of the curfe of God upon murder. FOR God himſelf affures us, that his bro- ther's blood cryed up from the earth, for ven- geance upon him; and accordingly we find that he was branded, he was banifhed, he was emphatically curft by God; and every portion of ground, he attempted to till, was peculiarly curft for his fake. And can we after this imagine, that life was left him for any other reaſon, than another curfe? And Cain himſelf was fufficiently fenfible that it was left him for no other reaſon: this appears from that bitter lamentation of his, My punish- ment is greater than I can bear. Behold, thou haft driven me out this day from the face of the earth, and from thy face fhall I be hid; and I fhall be a fugitive and a vagabond in the earth, and it shall come to pass, that every one that find- eth me, shall flay me; To this complaint God makes this reply,- Therefore (or as it is better render'd, for that reafon) whosoever flayeth Cain, vengeance shall be taken on him feven-fold; i. e. For that very reaſon, becauſe your puniſhment is greater than you can bear, becauſe you ſhall be an exile, a fugitive and a vagabond—a fignal example of divine ven- geance upon guilt-for theſe very reaſons, I will preſerve you, and fet a mark upon you, that no man fhall dare to flay you-Now, on ſuppoſition that this was the reaſon of God's pre- REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 167 preferving Cain, (and furely it will be hard to find another reaſon why that murderer was ſo fignally protected;) I fay, upon ſuppoſition that this was the reafon, and that Lamech knew it (as he could not but know it) his ex- clamation to his wives is plainly a confeffion, that he had been guilty of a much greater crime than Cain: that he had murder'd from a much leſs pardonable motive, than preference in the favour of God (which was the caſe of Cain) and therefore concluded that God might juſtly render him a much more dreadful monu- ment of his wrath, than he had render'd Cain; -And in this terror, that bitter exclamation falls from him, If Cain fhall be avenged Seven- fold, truly Lamech feventy and feven-fold. THE character of Lamech's family makes this account yet more credible: One of his fons being the inventer of mufical inftruments, and the other an instructer of every artificer in braſs and iron; or, (as it is in the hebrew) a whet- ter of every work of brass and iron, i. e. in the moſt rational interpretation of the words, an artificer of weapons of war. For the com- mon inftruments for tillage and building were invented long before Cain had built a city before this; and 'tis fcarcely imaginable how this could be done without fome knowledge and uſe of metals-From hence 'tis reaſonable to believe, that as one of Lamech's fons invent- ed inftruments of luxury, fo the other invented M 4 in- 168 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. inftruments of violence. And this is further confirm'd from the character of Vulcan with the heathen, who was certainly no other than this very Tubal Cain: and from the beft ac- counts antiquity affords, in relation to this man's character, we have reafon to conclude, that his buſineſs was, to forge inftruments of violence and war. AND as luxury naturally begets a diſpoſition to injure others in their property; and fuch a difpofition, armed with offenfive weapons, naturally tends to beget all kinds of infolence and outrage to our fellow creatures: all theſe confiderations make it highly probable, that as Lamech had gratified his luft (in polygamy) by force and violence; his example, in a race fo armed, and at the fame time remarkable for gigantick ftature and ftrength, (as we are affured many of the ante-diluvians probably of that race were) might naturally enough in- troduce all that train of corruption, which drew God's judgments upon the earth. AND indeed, this feems fufficiently evident from Mofes's account of the matter: for im- mediately before he mentions the laſt dege- neracy of mankind, he tells us, that the fons of God, i. e. the defcendents of Seth, (who called themſelves by that name, in contra- diftinction to thofe of Cain, who, probably, the heighth of their impiety, difclaimed the REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 169 the divine original of man) faw the daughters of men, and took them wives of all which they choſe. The plain fenfe of which words, is this; that every man took to himſelf as many wives out of them as he lik'd: making his liking, the only limit and meaſure of the number. And when the righteous race of Seth, fell into this vice of polygamy, then followed an univerfal depravity. And accordingly, as foon as Mofes hath related this mifconduct of the fons of Seth, he im- mediately adds, And the Lord faid, My Spirit Shall not always ftrive with man; i. e. that it was in vain to oppofe any more methods of mercy to this torrent of impiety; for the earth was then throughly corrupt, and filled with violence. AND as this is a natural account of this progrefs of evil, fo it is probable, this out- cry of Lamech's was occafioned by obferving all that terrible train of iniquity, which his example had introduced into the world. For Mofes relates nothing of his lamentation, till after he hath told us of the birth of his fons by both his wives; and the inventions of both thoſe fons: and therefore, 'tis highly probable, he never faw his guilt in a true light, till he faw the dreadful effects of it in his pofterity, in his own pofterity at leaſt, if not in that of Seth's alfo. And this might naturally enough make him lament his 170 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. his guilt to his wives; and in that lamenta- tion, own, that he deferved vaftly more puniſhment on that fcore, from the hand of God, than even Cain himſelf. AND thus, having fhewn you how it was poffible, and by what gradations it is probable, that iniquity increas'd to fo monstrous an height in the world, as to lay the divine juftice and goodneſs under a neceffity of deftroying the human race by a flood: I now proceed to enquire, by what means that calamity was brought upon the earth. DI S REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 171 DISSERTATION X. Concerning the natural caufes made uſe of by Almighty God to flood the earth. A ND here I muft own, that fuch an enquiry is matter of much more curiofity, than ufe; fince this work was evidently miracu- lous. And they, who have at- tempted to account for it any other way, are found to have departed juft fo far from philoſophy and truth, as they departed from revelation. And therefore, omitting the feveral imaginations of men upon this head, I fhall juſt trace that account of the matter, which is naturally and obviouſly deducible from the fcripture; and is as follows: MOSES tells us in the firft chapter of Genefis, that when God created the earth, darkness 72 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. darkness was upon the face of the deep, and the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. From hence 'tis evident, that the face of the deep, is the face of the waters; and confequently, that the earth was cover'd with water, immediately after the creation: nay more, that thefe waters cover'd the face of the earth to a confiderable depth, in the fame manner that the fea now covers fome portions of it. For we find, that the wa- ters, which now cover'd the earth, are call'd the deep, which is the known expref- fion, by which the moft profound part of the fea is fignified, in fcripture; (as you may read in the fifty-first chapter of Iſaiah at the tenth verfe) and could with no propriety be us'd in this place, on this occafion, if the waters had not at this time cover'd the earth to a confiderable depth. And this reafoning is fully confirmed from the 104th Pfalm, where David, de- fcribing the power and wifdom of God in the creation of the earth, makes uſe of this magnificent image; Thou coveredft it with the deep as with a garment: the waters flood above the mountains. AFTER this, in the order of the creation, followed the divifion of light from darknefs; and after this, the diftribution of that water which was upon the earth, into two diftinct regions; according to thefe words of Mofes REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 173 And Moſes. And God faid, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters. God made the firmament, and divided the waters, which were under the firmament, from the waters, which were above the firmament: and it was fo: And God called the firmament, heaven: and the evening and the morning were the fecond day. And God faid, Let the wa- ters under the heaven be gathered together into one place, and let the dry land appear: and it was fo; and God called the dry land, earth; and the gathering together of the wa- ters called he, feas; and God faw that it was good. And this operation alfo of the divine power, by which the waters were collected into one place, is nobly deſcribed by David in the forementioned Pfalm: At thy rebuke they fled; at the voice of thy thunder they hafted away; they go up by the mountains; they go down by the valleys; unto the place which thou hast founded for them; thou haft fet a bound that they may not pass over: that they turn not again to cover the earth. FROM this defcription, a learned * com- mentator concludes, that when God had ſeparated fo much water from the earth as * Dr. Patrick, he 174 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. he thought proper, by the interpofition of the firmament, he prepared a receptacle for what remain'd, by breaking up a proper portion of the earth, with the violence of an earthquake, caufed by the inflammation of nitro-fulphureous matter pent up in it for that very purpoſe. And as the waters would, in that cafe, be firft thrown up to an immenſe height, and then ruſh down im- petuous into their hold, we may conceive an image of this fcene, from that beautiful deſcription of the Pfalmift: At thy rebuke they fled; at the voice of thy thunder they bafted away, they go up by the mountains; they go down by the vallyes: or rather, (as it is exprefs'd with infinitely more beauty and magnificence in the original), they af- cend the mountains, they defcend the valleys: words which moft admirably exprefs the ſpeed and impetuofity of their motion, both in their projection and fall. And that fome- thing like this was the real cafe, ſeems not improbable from that exalted paffage in the 38th chapter of Job, where God, queftion- ing that righteous man concerning the works of infinite wifdom and magnificence, mani- feſted in the creation, asks him, Who Shut up the fea with doors: when it brake forth, as it had iffued out of the womb. made the cloud the garment thereof; darkness a fwathing-band for it, brake up for it my decreed place? When I and thick and AND REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 175 AND as this is the account the fcriptures give us of the original expanfion, divifion, and diftribution of the waters at the crea- tion; nothing is more intelligible, nothing is more obvious to the meaneft capacity, than how God could deluge the world whenever he pleas'd. Since nothing more was requifite to effect this, than letting down thoſe waters which he firft lifted up; and clofing up thofe vaft hollows of the earth, (in order to throw up the water uni- formly upon its furface) into which he firft tore the earth, in order to receive the water from the fame furface: or, (as Mofes ex- preffes it) to let the dry land appear. ANY man, that cafts his eye upon a com- mon map of the world, will fee that more than two thirds of the globe are already cover'd with fea, to a confiderable depth. And if we add to thefe, that part of its fur- face, which is over-fpread with freſh-water, lakes and rivers, we fhall fcarce find one quarter part of the earth dry, at this day. And there is reafon to believe that the depth of the fea is, in many places prodi- gious, perhaps exceeding the height of the higheſt mountains. Now the bare clo- fing of fome of theſe vaft hollows, would throw up fuch mountains of water, upon the earth, as were fufficient to deluge a confi- derable part of it: Add to this, that many rivers 176 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. rivers now run under the earth; and that vaſt ſubterraneous caverns are now found in feveral parts of it, filled with water, which, if thrown upon the furface, would doubtless add immenfly to the floods that already cover it. AND befides all this, it is not improbable, that there may be, even, yet a vaſt abyſs of waters fhut up within this outward fhell of the earth, fufficient to deluge it, whenever Almighty God fhould think fit to break open the fhell that furrounds them, and force them up upon the furface: That there was ſuch a ſtore originally depofited in it, is clearly and indubitably collected from feveral paffages of facred writ. Thus in the eighth chapter of the Proverbs, wiſdom is introduced ſpeaking of God's creation in the following manner; When he prepared the heavens, I was there; when he Jet a compafs upon the face of the depth: when be efta- blifhed the clouds above; when he ftrengthened the fountains of the deep, i. e. (in the moſt natural ſenſe of the words) when he fenced in the fountains of the deep, with a folid arch of earth. So likewife in the 24th Pſalm at the 2d verfe, David fays of the earth, that God founded it upon the feas; and established it upon the floods. And again, at the 136th Pfalm, REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 147 Pfalm, when he exhorts to give thanks to the Lord, he adds at the fixth verfe, To him that stretched out the earth above the waters. very Now Mofes afcribes the deluge to two cauſes: he tells us, that the fountains of the great deep were broken up; and that the rain was upon the earth forty days and forty nights. What ſtores of water God might have origi- nally reſerved in the earth for this very pur- pofe, is impoffible to ſay. That he did make fuch a reſerve, is fufficiently evident from theſe words of Mofes. And tho' the fame quantity ſhould not now remain, we fhould remember that St. Peter affures us, that the ſtate of the earth, at prefent, is different from what it was at firſt. His words are thefe: By the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth ſtanding out of the water, and in the water. the Greek expreffion, which is here render'd, Standing out of the water, may alfo be ren- der'd, made up of water, i. e. having a vaſt quantity of water in its bowels; and either interpretation brings us to the fame conclu- fion: For if the earth was founded upon the waters, (as the Pfalmift affures us it was) then the apoftle's expreffion is true in either fenfe; for then it might properly be faid to ftand out of the water, and in the water; and N Now as +4 178 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. as properly to confift, in a great meaſure, of water. AND an earth fo conftituted, being, at the fame time, encompaffed by a vaft flood of waters, fupported by the atmo- ſphere, was eaſily flooded, at the pleaſure of God. BUT here it may be ask'd, How this atmoſphere, which furrounds the earth, could fupport fo vaft a quantity of vapours, as were fufficient for forty days inceffant rain over the face of the whole earth? I ANSWER, That tho' the preſent atmo- ſphere extends but a fmall way, nothing is more intelligible, upon the known princi- ples of philofophy, than that God could, even according to the prefent eſtabliſhment of nature, (tho' we are by no means to be determined in our reafonings upon this head, by the preſent ftate of things in relation to this earth, which St. Peter affures us is very different from its original condition), diſpoſe an immenfe quantity of vapours, in that vaſt expanſe which furrounds the earth, by rarefying them to what degree, and con- fequently, expanding them to what extent, he thought proper; efpecially if the moon and ftars confpire to thefe operations, as * 3 well REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 179 well as the fun, as learned men think they do * Nay, the learned theorift, who afcribes this immenfe rain to the atmoſphere. of a comet, (which, I own, is by much the moſt probable of all extraordinary natural means) by admitting, that it actually did rain forty days and forty nights, muft admit that the expanfe, furrounding the earth, could fupport a quantity of vapours fuffi cient for that rain: otherwife thofe vapours muſt have fallen down at once, and not by a gradual defcent for forty days and nights. BUT fuppofing the atmoſphere could not, in its ordinary ſtate, fupport a quantity of vapours fufficient for forty days inceffant rain, upon the wicked world at that time; furely it was eafy for God to add what quantity he thought fit, from the other ele- ments; which we know are tranfmutable into one another. Every naturalift knows, that water rarefied is air; and 'tis as evident, that air, condens'd to a certain degree, may be water that water, at prefent, either conſtitutes a great part of the air we breathe, or, at leaft, is to a great degree mixt with it, is known beyond all doubt. And why ★ Vid. Varenii geograph. cap. 19. prop. 3. & 4. p. 222, 223. N 2 the 180 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. the whole body of it, except what was neceffary for the few furviving animals, might not be either condens'd, or tranfmuted into that element on this occafion, is not eafy to fay nor to how immenfe a quantity the whole expanfe of air and æther ſo tranf- muted would amount. And 'tis evident, that the very earth, waſh'd off by the rains on this occafion, (and there is reafon to be- lieve, that the upper ftrata were waſh'd off to a confiderable depth) might add immenfly to the fluid mafs, even fuppofing it not tranſmuted into water; and I fee no reafon why it was not tranfmuted, unleſs it were, that ſuch a tranfmutation was not neceffary to the purpoſes of providence at that time: for otherwiſe, fince the whole conduct of God was very extraordinary in relation to this affair; why might it not have been fo in this refpect, as well as in every other? His fufpending all that water (or, at leaſt, the greateſt part of it) which he originally divided from the earth by the firmament, for 1656 years together, was doubtlefs what we call miraculous. And his letting it all down at any time afterwards, for forty days and nights together, after it was ſo taken up, was evidently no leſs miraculous. "TIS vain therefore to trouble ourſelves in fearching what means Almighty God made 3 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 181 made ufe of to produce this effect; whether by the acceſs and atmoſphere of a comet; or by a tranfmutation of fome other elements into water on that occafion; or barely let- ting down thoſe waters he firft lifted up from the earth, and forcing up thofe foun- tains he firſt depofited in it; which ſeems to be the plain truth of the cafe, whatever change may fince have been wrought, either in the earth or firma- ment. Ir muſt indeed be for ever own'd, with the utmoſt gratitude, by all candid enqui- rers after truth, that to enquire what means God made ufe of on this occafion, in order to vindicate fo noble a part of the Mofaic hiftory, and the difpenfations of providence in the government of the world, and to filence the objections of importunate cavillers on this head, is the work of a moft commendable and noble curiofity: otherwife, what avails it to any human creature of common humility, to know what means God made ufe of on this occafion, when fo many means were equally in his choice? and when all means were equally fufficient for it, in the hands of omnipotence ? N 3 AND 182 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. AND therefore I haften to that which is more our concern to know, and to demon- ſtrate to the confufion of infidelity; and that is, what ends of divine wifdom were an- fwer'd by this fignal deſtruction of the old world, ส * ! DI $19 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 183 DISSERTATION XI. Concerning the ends of divine wisdom anfwered by the deluge. H AVING, in the precedent dif- fertationg fhewn you, what me- thods of mercy and wifdom it pleas'd God to make uſe of, to keep mankind in a courfe of duty, and to deter them from difobedience, before the flood; and that, upon the failure of all thofe methods, there was an apparent neceffity of a new revelation at that time, antecedent to the deftruction of that dege- nerate race, in order to vindicate the juſtice, and the goodneſs of God in the government of the world; to let all fucceeding ge- nerations fee, that no means were left un- effay'd for their amendment; and that no- thing, but the laft neceffity, compell'd their Maker to proceed to extremities with his N 4 crea- 184 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. creatures: Having likewiſe fhewn you how it was poffible, and by what means it was probable, that mankind became fo exceed- ingly corrupt before the flood; and alfo by what means that calamity might be brought upon the earth: I now proceed to enquire, what ends of the divine wiſdom and good- neſs were aniwered by it. AND one end of divine wifdom plainly anfwered by it, is this, the eſtabliſhment of one univerfal, inconteftable, perpetual mo- nument of his power and providence in the puniſhment of guilt, over the face of the whole earth. ALL the other methods of providence, however, in themfelves, wife and wonder- ful, are yet, thro' the perverfeneſs and va- nity of human nature, fome way or other objects of doubt, and difpute, at leaſt, if not of direct denial, and downright ridicule, with that ſpirit of infidelity which is gone out into the world; but the deluge is out of the reach of all poffible exception; and forces that evil fpirit to be as dumb, on this occafion, as it is deaf and loud upon others. IF we vindicate the goodnefs of God, in laying no more than one eaſy reſtraint upon our firſt parents, in paradife, we are imme- diately ask'd, Why God did not rather lay moral REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 185 ! moral reſtraints upon them? when we fhew that there was no need of moral reſtraints in that ſtate of things; we then are ask'd, Why any reſtraints? i. e. Why God did not make his creatures independent of himſelf? or, Why he did not make them all as per- fect as himfelf? IF we, tell them of God's teaching us our duty by the plaineft precepts and prohibi- tions, they infift, that words are eaſily miſ taken, but the true way of teaching, is from the nature of things. If we urge, that teaching by types and fymbols, is teaching from the nature of things, they immediately cry out for plain precepts that can't be mif- taken. If we vindicate the reaſonableneſs of pofitive inftitutions, from a Being of infinite wifdom, to beings of a very limited capacity, they immediately call out for rational pre- cepts. If religion is recommended for its rational precepts, they fay, rational precepts fufficiently recommend themſelves. We no fooner fhew the excellence of the religion of Christ, but they cry up the religion of na- ture. If we tell them, that the religion of Chrift, has perfected the religion of nature; they anfwer, That reafon and nature were fufficient without that religion. If we urge, that reafon is not fufficient, and that the good- 186 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. goodness of God exacted fome revelation for the reſtraint and guidance of his creatures, they tell us, that the goodnefs of God made it neceffary that his creatures fhould be fo perfect as to be their own guides. If we anfwer, That God made man perfect in the beginning, but that he himſelf forfeited that felicity; they laugh, with the fcoffers men- tioned by the apoftle, and tell us, that all things are now as they were from the begin- sing. HERE then we join iffue with them; and tell them, that there was a time, when God fignally interpos'd in the puniſhment of a corrupt world, by an univerfal deluge of waters; and that only one man and his family were providentially refcued from that puniſhment; and that the oldeſt hiftories and antiquities of all nations under heaven, agree in the truth of this fact. THEY anfwer, That all antiquity is fabu- lous; that there might, indeed, have been particular deluges, by fome accident, in par- ticular places; and that the people of thoſe places might imagine that all the reft of the world was drown'd except fome few, that cfcaped among themfelves; and fo the tra- dition might become univerfal: but that a deluge was fo, is utterly incredible and im- poffible, HERE REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 187 HERE then we call in natural philofophy, and aftronomy to our aid. The firſt of thefe teaches us, that tho' this atmoſphere extends but a ſmall way, yet, 'tis impoffible to ſay, what quantity of vapours may be fufpended in this vaft expanfe which fur- rounds the earth, poffibly a quantity fuffi- cient for more than forty days inceffant rain over the face of the whole earth; at leaſt, it might have been fo, in the original con- ftitution of things, in relation to this nether world, tho' poffibly the ftate of things may now be very different, from their original conftitution. That there are alſo many ſub- terraneous rivers and receptacles of water in the earth, which, with the floods forced up by clofing fome great hollows in the depths of the ocean, would throw an inconceivable quantity of water upon that part of the earth, which is now dry. And that there are unanswerable reafons to believe, that, beſides all theſe fupplies, there is a vaft fund of waters fhut up in the very bowels of the earth, to be thrown up upon the fur- face of it, at the pleaſure of its Maker; at leaſt, St. Peter affures us, this was the ori- ginal ftate of the earth; and if it pleafed God to break the outward fhell of the earth, and force out the fluid contained in it, by the interpofition of natural cauſes, rather than by fome immediate act of power, aftro- nomy 188 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. nomy demonftrates the poffibility of doing fo, by the acceſs of a comet; which, by the force of attraction, might alter the figure of the earth, from ſpherical to oval; and by that means, force out the fluid within it, at a great variety of fiffures, which would necef- farily be form'd on this occafion. That, if all this were not enough to drown this ball, an inconfiderable portion of the atmoſphere of the fame comet, would be demonftrably fufficient to anſwer the Moſaic account of the deluge. HERE then are hiftory, antiquity, natural philofophy, and aftronomy full on the fide of revelation. What fubterfuge now for infidelity? Why ftill it may be urged, that fuppofing the difficulties, as to the poffibility of theſe effects, to be over, yet poffibility and probability join'd together, don't infer reality and certainty. HERE then we appeal once more to na- ture; and find that, in fact, there are, at this day, as cvident, as demonftrative, as inconteſtable proofs of the deluge, over the face of the whole earth, at the diſtance of about four thouſand years, as if it had hap- pen'd but laſt year. And whereas Mofes affures us, that the waters prevailed fifteen cubits above the tops of the highest mountains, let the mountains themfelyes be appeal'd to for REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 189 for the truth of this affertion: Examine the higheſt eminences of the earth, and they all, with one accord, produce the fpoils of the ocean depoſited upon them on that occafion; the ſhells and skeletons of fea-fifh, and fea- monſters of all kinds. The Alps, the Ap- pennine, the Pyrenees, the Andes and Atlas, and Ararat, every mountain of every region under heaven, from Japan to Mexico, all confpire in one uniform, univerfal proof, that they all had the fea ſpread over their higheſt fummits. Search the earth you ſhall find the moufe-deer, natives of Ame- rica buried in Ireland; elephants, natives of Afia and Africa, buried in the midſt of Eng- land; crocodiles, natives of the Nile, in the heart of Germany; fhell-fifh, never known in any but the American feas, together with entire skeletons of whales, in the moft inland regions of England; trees of vaft dimenſions, with their roots and tops, and fome alfo with leaves and fruit, at the bottoms of mines and marls; and that too, in regions where no tree of that kind was ever known to grow; nay, where it is demonftrably im- poffible they could grow. Nay more, trees and plants of various kinds, which are not known to grow in any region under hea- ven * * See Woodward's natural hiftory of the earth enlarged, and the defence of it. Bochart, &c. IF 190 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. If you ask how all this could be? How fhells could float in the water, 'fo as to reach, and to reft on the tops of mountains; or how, both they and other creatures fhould fink fo deep into the earth, as to be found. at the bottom of mines and quarries? I an- fwer, that all theſe events perfectly demon- ftrate Mofes's account of this matter to be incontestably true; fince all theſe events could plainly come to pafs, according to his account of the matter, but are utterly im- poffible, and unimaginable, upon any other principles. We now fee fhells of all kinds, conſtantly thrown upon the fhoar, by the working of the fea; and therefore, when all parts of the earth became fhoars by the gra- dual fwelling of the waters, 'tis obvious, that they all muft have fea-fhells fucceffively thrown upon them and forafmuch as, in all probability, no fifh were deftroy'd for food before the flood, 'tis evident, that fhell- fiſh, as all others, muſt have been in prodi- gious quantities in the fea at that time; as their being found to have been in prodigious quantities at that time, is alfo a very good proof that they were not deftroy'd for food before that time. BESIDES this, Mofes tells us that the foun- tains of the great deep were broken up on that occafion. Now the rushing up of the wa- ters REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 191 ters thro' thefe fountains, muft, of neceffity, caufe fo prodigious a commotion in the fea, as would throw up the heaviest bodies from the bottom of the ocean; and this working of that huge flood, added to the inceffant agitation of the rains and tides for ſo many days together, were fufficient to throw bodies of almoſt any weight, and much more fuch light bodies as fhells, upon the tops of the highest mountains. And if thoſe appear- ances they call Spouts, are now found fuffi- cient to force up waters above the clouds, and, by means of that force, to throw up ftones, and tear up anchors by ſome afto- niſhing power, with how much more force muft that water act and agitate, which is thrown up by the preffure of the earth? And as the breaking up of theſe fountains of the deep, is abundantly fufficient to account for any effect of the deluge, now obfervable upon the greateft heights of the earth, fo the return of the waters into the bowels of the earth, thro' the fame channels, when God fhut up the fountains of the deep, muft of neceffity, carry bodies of all kinds back with them again, into the bowels of the earth. ADD to this, that all that mafs of earth, and ſtones, and fhells, and trees, and ani- mals, which floated together in that immenfe body of waters, for fo many days, muft of necef- 192 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. neceffity, in their fubfiding, fill up a vaft many hollows left in the earth, from the be- ginning; and a vaſt many more made in it, by the fall, the motion and eruption of the waters, in infinite places. And that earth- quakes alfo, muft, in many places, have funk theſe bodies at fundry times, much deeper into the bowels of the earth ; and by that means, preferved them much fafer, than they otherwife would have been. AND thus it comes to pafs, that the heights and depths of the earth, equally and incon- teſtably confefs the mighty power and ſignal interpofition of God, in the deftruction of the old world, by a deluge of waters, for the wickedness of them that dwelt therein. Moun- tains and all bills, fruitful trees and cedars, beafts and all cattel, nay, fire and vapours, wind and form, (confpiring to prove the) fulfilling his word. And thus it comes to pafs, that we may with fome ſmall varia- tion fay, of Almighty God, from theſe uni- verfal effects, this ubiquity of his power, in the deluge, as David does, on another occa- fion, of the ubiquity of his preſence, If I climb up towards heaven, thou art there; if I go down towards hell, thou art there also. AND here I muft again put a plain queftion, to the patrons of infidelity. Do they REVELATION Examin'd, &c, 193 they know, that this univerfal atteftation of the whole earth to the truth of the Moſaic hiſtory, is an amazing and inconteftable proof, that that hiſtory is verified even in that part of it, which, of all others, is the moft furprizing? If they do know this, Why do they not believe it? Do they know it to be demonftrably true, and will they yet revile it, as if it were demonftrably falſe? Is it poffible there can be fuch monfters among the fons of men? And on the other hand, if they do not know it, will they dare to infult our faith, from the force of downright ftupidity and ignorance? Is this to be endur'd? We produce plain proof, de- monſtrative, inconteftable evidence, and they confute us with a loud irrefragable laugh, or a gentle, commiferating fmile: We urge reaſon, and they retort ridicule, and fo go off in triumph. MOSES had paſs'd his life in Egypt, and its confines, and it was impoffible for him, by any natural means, to know the ſtate of things in all the other regions of the earth. Theſe iſlands were not then, in all probabi- lity, known to the reft of the world; nor were China and America fo much as dreamt of. How then could Mofes take upon him to ſay in fo peremptory a manner, that the waters of the deluge prevailed over all the high hills, that were under the whole heaven ; Q end 194 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. and that the mountains were covered; unleſs he either knew this from the unerring fpirit of God, or was informed of it from fome fure unerring tradition? Now fuppofe it to be barely from tradition, if that tradition is found to be unerring in that part, which is at once the moſt amazing, and the moſt ex- ceptionable of all others, Can we confiftent- ly, with any degree of common ſenſe, dif- credit or difclaim it in any other part? efpe- cially, when it is found, upon a due enquiry, that there is a plain foundation for a clear, unqueftionable tradition in this cafe, from the few generations which had pafs'd between Noab and Mofes: and when all the parts of that tradition, are found, after the moft exact enquiry, to be perfectly conformable to the reafon and nature of things, as well as to the whole train of antiquity? BUT could not the higheft mountains of the earth have been gradually covered by particular deluges, fucceeding one another at feveral periods? I ANSWER, That nothing in nature is more irrational or unphilofophical, than ſuch fuppofition; as will immediately appear to any one, who confiders the nature of water, which nothing but a miracle could raife to fuch a height, and ſuch a ſtate of ſuſpenſion: and keep it in that ſtate, ſo as to cover the higheſt REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 195 higheſt mountains of the earth, and at the fame time leave its lower regions dry. But, however, if any man think it more rational to ſuppoſe a million of miracles in this cafe, than to admit the plain Mofaic account of this matter, he is at liberty, for me, to en- joy fuch fuppofitions, in full complacence. -- OTHERS are fond of fuppofing, that the preſent phenomena afcribed to the deluge, are the effects of fome difturb'd or chaotick ſtate of things, antecedent to the Mofaic creation; that is, in truth, fuch is the extravagance of human vanity and perverfe- nefs! we are fond of building upon every wild imagination that comes into our heads, however irrational and unfupported, rather than reſt upon the credit of the moſt rational, the moſt credible, the moſt authentic ac- counts of things, when once they appear to us, under the infuperable difadvantage, of being infpired by God! ANOTHER end of the Divine wifdom` and goodneſs, anfwer'd by the deluge, was, the taking off that curfe from the earth, which God had pronounced upon it, immediately after the fall. Now, that he did take off the curfe from the earth, at this time, is evident both from fcripture and reaſon. O 2 WE 196 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. WE read in Genefis v. 28, 29, that when Lamech had lived an hundred eighty and two years, he begat a fon, and called his name Noah, (which fignifies reft) faying, This fame fhall comfort us concerning our work and toil of our hands; becauſe of the ground which the Lord hath curfed. This text is common- ly explain'd by the fubfequent account of Noah's being an husbandman, and finding out the uſe of wine; as if no more was meant by thoſe words of Lamech's, than that Noah, by that invention, fhould bring great confo- lation to mankind, under the labours of life. Now this is evidently a wrong inter- pretation; for no man believes that Noah was the firſt husbandman; (that trade was as old as Adam) nor is there the leaft reafon to believe from the text, that he firſt found out the art of making wine. 'Tis faid, in- deed, that he planted a vineyard; but cer- tainly it does not follow from hence, that he was the firft that did fo; nay, the contrary feems much more probable from the text: for it is faid, that Noah began to be an huf- bandman, and he planted a vineyard. feems evidently implied in theſe words, that Noah never had been a husbandman till this time. 'Tis probable the righteous race of Seth, were fhepherds like Abel, and that Noah was an entire ftranger to agriculture, till neceffity made him turn his thoughts It that REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 197 that way, after the flood; nor is it in the leaft likely, he ſhould invent the way of making wine, at the very beginning of his applying to that profeffion. Suppofe him the firſt planter of vines: Is it any way cre- dible, that the very firft planter of vines, invented wine? no furely. Does any man believe, that the firft planter of orchards, invented cyder; or, that the firſt planter of any tree found out the way of fermenting liquors from the fruit of that tree? nothing is lefs credible than fuch a fuppofition. BESIDES, I think it credible from a paf- fage in the new teftament, that wine was invented before the flood. In the feventeenth chapter of St. Luke and the twenty-fixth verfe, our Saviour tells his difciples, that as it was in the days of Noe, fo fhould it also be in the days of the Son of man: they did eat, they drank, &c. till the day that Noe entered the ark, and the flood came and destroyed them. Alfo as it was in the days of Lot, they did eat, they drank, &c. Now we know, that by eating and drinking in the days of the Son of man, is meant, feafting and drinking wine; and the fame is alfo meant by eating and drinking in the days of Lot: and therefore, by parity of reafon, the fame fhould alfo be underſtood of the days of Noe; efpecially fince this is the known fenfe in which our Saviour ufes thefe words, 03 as 198 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. as may be ſeen from Matt. xi. 18, 19. For John came neither eating nor drinking, and they fay, He hath a devil; the Son of man came eating and drinking, and they ſay, Behold, a man gluttonous and a wine-bibber. And can we after this fufpect, that by eating and drink- ing in the days of Noe, is meant, any thing lefs than feafting and drinking wine? BUT fuppofe Noah were the inventer of wine: How does the invention of wine take off the curfe from the earth? And how ſmall a number of thofe that toil in tilling it, are any way advantag'd by that invention? And therefore the only rational interpretation of Lamech's fpeech upon the birth of Noah, is this; that he, being a prophet, forefaw that God would in his fon's time, and out of a particular regard to his righteouſneſs, take off the curfe from the earth; and be- ſtow all thoſe bleffings, upon him, and his race, which had never been beftowed upon any man, fince the fall. And we find, that, in fact, God Almighty did blefs Noah, and his fons, after the flood, in the very fame manner, in which he bleffed Adam and Eve after the creation; and not only gave them dominion over the creatures, but likewife enlarged their charter; and gave them a right to the uſe of the creatures for food; with this additional affurance, that REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 199 that he would no more curfe the earth for the fins of mankind *. AND as this is the moft rational account of this matter, from the teftimony of fcripture, 'tis evident, from the nature of the flood, that the curfe muft be taken off the earth, at that time. This appears from confidering the flood, upon the foot of any rational hypo- thefis, that can be form'd concerning it. If the curfe was executed by withholding rain from the earth, during the whole period be- fore the flood, or a confiderable part of it, (as poffibly it might) 'tis evident, that the faturation of it with rain and falts, on that occafion, together with the conftant ſupply of moiſture from the clouds ever fince, muſt effectually take off that curſe, from that day to this. Add to this, that the infinite fhoals of fiſh, and all the carcafes of animals, which would naturally be left on the heights of the earth on this occafion, muſt have left a vaft fund of fatnefs, to be gradually waſhed down thence upon the lower lands, by every ſhower from heaven. It muft, in- deed, be own'd, that land animals cannot reaſonably be fuppofed to have been fo very numerous in that accurfed ſtate of the * See this matter very ingenioufly and clearly difcufs'd in Dr. Sherlock's difcourfes of propheſy. 0 4 earth, 200 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. Car- earth, as now; but fifh, doubtlefs, were more numerous: None of them, in all hu- man probability, being deftroy'd for human food before that time; and as many kinds of fiſh ſwim in vaft fhoals, and all that we know of them, feed in fhallow wa- ters; 'tis evident, that as the waters funk faft, the furface of the earth being at the fame time unequal, many of them alfo de- lighting in mud and flutch, vaft numbers of them muſt be deferted upon the tops of the higheſt mountains; and fo proportionably, upon all leffer eminences of the earth. cafes alfo of all kinds of land animals, float- ing in the waters, would naturally fink, where thoſe waters were fhalloweft, that is, where the earth was higheft: and as men alfo are very reaſonably fuppofed to have been then immenfly numerous, from their longevity, 'tis evident, they alfo muft have greatly added to the treaſure of rich mould, left upon the mountains on this occafion ; and in that condition to which the earth muft neceffarily be reduced at that time, 'tis evident all thefe carcafes would naturally fink into it, and fo be covered over with mould, and mud, upon the drying of it again which was neceffary to prevent a peftilence from the corruption of thofe carcafes in open air. BUT REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 201 BUT it is fuppofed by fome, that man- kind were but a fmall number at the time of the Mofaic deluge, and therefore an univerfal flood was not neceſſary. I ANSWER, That this fuppofition is evi- dently erroneous, and for the readers full fatisfaction on this head, I refer him to Mr. Whifton's learned and rational account of this matter in his theory of the earth. THAT there have been particular deluges, is proved beyond all doubt, by many learned writers, antient and modern *; but then the authentick inftances of this kind, which they give us, are only of level or low lands flooded from the accidental breaking of thoſe banks or diques which kept out the fea but to imagine that high and mountainous regions, Attica, for example, and Theffaly, could be cover'd with water, and yet, that lower regions fhould continue dry at the fame time, is a fuppofition attended with much more difficulty than an univerfal deluge. ; THIS objection being removed, I think it evident, that the curfe muft have been taken off the earth by the deluge, according to that account of the matter, which is moft natural and obvious to the apprehenfions of mankind. * See, in the prefent ſtate of the republick of letters for October, 1731. printed for William Iūnys, London, letter relating to fome difficulties arijing rom reading Mr. Wood, ward's account of the manner and effects of the deluge. · A OR 202 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. OR fuppofe all the upper ftrata of the earth, to have been entirely torn off, by the rains and eruptions of water from the foun- tains of the deep, on this occafion: (as, I think, 'tis highly probable they were) 'tis evident, that, after thefe rains and eruptions were over, they would fubfide again for the moft part, according to their ſpecifick gravi- ties and confequently the bodies of all animals would fubfide laft, and fo fink into the mud as before. Except fuch as in this tumult fhould chance to be loaded, or other- wife entangled with heavier matter; and they, would neceffarily be carry'd down, and mix'd with the ftrata of fuch heavier matter, as they are found to be at this day. The fiſh alſo would fwim and feed, and be de- ferted, as before. AND in this cafe, 'tis evident, that the earth would be, to all intents of fruitfulneſs, in full as good a condition, as that in which it was left, when God firft removed the wa- ters from it, at the creation, and made the dry land appear. Except what alterations might have been caus'd in it, by any new motion or by its being placed in fome dif- ferent relation to the fun or planets at this time, which doubtless might occafion much difference in the temperament of the air; and in REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 203 in confequence of that, in the vegetation of plants, and lives of animals. IF it be ask'd, How rain could waſh off all the upper layers of the earth? I anſwer, That cataracts of rain could do this in a few hours; nay, in a few minutes. And fince the LXX interpret the windows of heaven, open'd on this occafion, by the cataracts of heaven, there is reaſon to believe, that the rain, which introduc'd the deluge, began, at leaft, in cataracts. THERE is an account in the philofophical * tranfactions, of a fall of water from the heavens, which, in a few minutes, tore up the earth ſeven foot deep, to the very rock which lay under it. If that rain had lafted a few days, nay, even a few hours, will any man ſay it might not have waſh'd away much of the rock, if not all? And there is all the reafon in the world to believe, that an infinite number of rocks were waſh'd away at the deluge. How, otherwiſe, is it poffible, that fea fhells and fea animals of feveral kinds, fhould be found in the midft of rocks of marble at this day, as they fre- quently are? 'Tis notorious to a proverb, that a conftant drop will wear away a ſtone: And * Motte's abridgment, vol. 2, p. 215. what 204 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. what rock can we imagine fo hard, as not to yield to the violence of a continued cataract? The only difficulty is, how the particles of ftone, fo wafh'd off, fhould become rocks again but this difficulty is alfo remov'd, by confidering, that upon the ceafing of the turbulent motion of the waters, their fpeci- fick gravity muft make them fubfide toge- ther in great quantities; and in that fubfi- dence they might eafily carry other bodies down with them, efpecially fhells, which are nearly of their own fpecifick gravity and fince marble, now pounded into very ſmall parts, is found eafily to coalefce into maffes of marble again; (and might more eafily do fo in the earth from immenfe preffure); nothing is more conceivable, than how very ſmall particles of marble might alſo coalefce in like manner at the deluge. And fince God exprefly declared on this occafion, (as you may read in the fixth chapter of Genefis) that he would deftroy all flesh, and the earth alſo, (for fo both the Hebrew and the Greek of this paffage is plainly to be underſtood), I think it demonftrable from the effects of the deluge, now ob- ferved in the earth, that, in fact, what is properly call'd earth, that is, the upper ftrata of the globe, were actually and literally deftroy'd at that time; and being deſtroy'd and eſtabliſh'd again, as at the crea- REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 205 creation, the curfe, muft, in the eſtabliſhment of it, be taken off *. AND thus having fhewn you two great and excellent ends anfwered by the deluge, the eſtabliſhment of one perpetual, incon- teftable memorial of the divine interpofition for the puniſhment of fin, and the taking off that curfe from the earth, which was laid on after the fall: I now proceed, in a few words, to anſwer two objections of weight which lie against this doctrine; and fo conclude. * But if any man think it more credible, that theſe rocks might be form'd by fecretions of the finer parts of ſtone from the earth, in the diffolution of its upper ftrata, on this occafion; (or by the petrification of certain kinds of clay) and can reconcile this opinion to the plain declarations of fcripture; I fhall not contend with him upon the matter: fince it is evi- dent, that rocks might be formed by the fubfiding and coalef- cence of fimilar particles of ſtone, fo fever'd from the earth, at this time; in the very fame manner that they were form'd at the first reduction of the Chaos, into form, by thofe laws which it hath pleaſed God to impreſs upon matter. Nor do I believe, that any man will pretend to fay, Why ſtones might not be then form'd in the earth by thefe laws? fince we now fee them daily form'd in the bodies of living creatures, by laws lefs obvious to our underſtandings. Nay poffibly many of thofe ftrata, which are now ſtone, were originally clay, now petrified. (See more on this fub- ject in Motte's abridgment of the philofoph. tranfact. vol. 2. P. 254. See alfo the letter in relation to Dr. Woodward's hiſtory before referred to.) DIS- 206 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. DISSERTATION XII. Objections to the Mofaic account of the deluge, and this explication of it confidered. HE firft is this: That man ftill eats bread in the sweat of his and that the earth is fill O cursed with thorns and thiſtles. T brow; I ANSWER, That the labour of one man, is now fufficient for the fupport of a great many; and confequently, a great majority of mankind, are exempted from the neceffity of labouring in the earth and by that means, are at liberty to be imploy'd in thoſe purſuits of knowledge, and thoſe conve- niences and ornaments of life, which can alone make it defirable to reaſonable crea- tures. And fuch a growth of thorns and thiftles, as defeats not this end, fhould rather REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 207 rather be confider'd, as a neceffary, and a happy incitement to induftry; for tho' God took the curfe from the earth, yet human nature not being yet recovered to its original. rectitude, which could only make a life ex- empted from labour, defirable: it could not be his intention, that men fhould pass away their lives in idlenefs and floth: and I think it juſtly doubtful, whether thorns and thiſtles, which were demonftrably a curſe to Adam, are not now rather bleffings to his pofterity; agreeably to God's great preroga- tive of power and wifdom, to produce good out of evil f. AGAIN, the grant of the creatures for food, given immediately after the deluge, hath exceedingly lightened the labours of life, by leffening the neceffity of tillage; and by that means, the curfe of toil, impos'd upon Adam, is, in a great meafure remov'd. And this very grant ſeems plainly to imply, † It is not, I believe, imagin'd, that thorns and weeds had no exiſtence before the curfe: how vexatious they might have been from that time till the flood, is impoffible to fay; that now, fince the diſtinction of property, thorns are a vaſt blef- fing to the earth, is undeniable. That thiſtles are here put for weeds in general, I take for granted; and, I believe, every candid man will find upon enquiry, that weeds now anſwer fo many excellent ends and ufes in life, as render them rather a blefling than a curſe. that 208 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. that the curfe was now taken off the earth, For certainly, if the earth had not now been fitted to produce plenty of grain, as well as herbage, it could never ſuſtain fuch a vaſt number of animals, as are now daily deſtroyed for food: many of which, are fup- ported almoſt entirely by grain, (as moſt kinds of fowl) and others require great fup- plies of grain, as well as herbage; all which the earth is now found fufficient to fupply, with the toil of a comparatively ſmall num- ber of men. And befides this, great quanti- ties of grain, are now employed in fupplying mankind with thofe liquors, which chear them under their toils; and by that means, ex- ceedingly lighten the labours of life. And, I believe, no one imagines that this was an advantage enjoy'd by the antediluvian world. Add to all this, that where the earth is al- moſt wholly exhauſted by inceffant tillage, 'tis common to fee it furprizingly recruited, and enrich'd again at once, by the treaſures depoſited in it at the deluge; as is the known caſe of marls, many of which are found to be nothing but huge heaps of fea- fhells, thro' length of time diffolv'd in the earth. And, in all probability, all the kinds of marls are no more than the fame ſubſtance, ſomewhat diverfified by the dif ferent foils in which they are depofited. SUCH REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 209 SUCH care hath the Divine wifdom and goodneſs taken, not only to perpetuate the proof of that great judgment, which fin brought upon the earth: but alfo to demonftrate, that at the fame time that God puniſh'd fin, he remember'd mercy; and in that very act of chaftifement upon the wicked, laid up a bleffing for the righteous; laid up wherewithal to reward honeft in- duftry, to the end of the world. AGAIN 'tis objected, that when God efta- bliſhed his covenant with Noah, never more to deſtroy the earth or the creatures by a flood, he appointed the rain-bow to be a fignal of that covenant: now the rain-bow is only the effect of certain reflections and refractions of the rays of the fun from a watry cloud and how can that be a fignal that there fhall be no deluge? I ANSWER, That the rain-bow is the pro- pereſt ſignal of ſuch a covenant that can be imagined. For the reflection of the fun from a watery cloud, is a certain fign, that tho' it rains in one part of the heavens, fome other part is clear and unclouded. And, 'tis evi- dent, there can be no univerfal deluge, without an univerfal rain; fuch as would over-caft the whole heaven, and hide the fun; and probably take away all diſtinction P of 210 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. of day and night. And as it is agreeable to reaſon to believe this, the accounts of the heathen, concerning the firft deluge, which they call the flood of Ogyges, are agreeable to this belief. Thus Solinus tells us, that one continued night hid the day on that occafion, for many months together. Nor is the fame thing obfcurely implied in thofe words at the eighth chapter of Genefis, where God declares, immediately after the deluge, that he would never more ſmite the earth in the fame manner: and to con- firm that declaration, he adds, While earth remaineth, feed-time, and harvest, and cold, and heat, and fummer, and winter, and day and night, fhall not ceafe. Now, 'tis cer- tain, that feed-time and harveft, and fum- mer and winter, (which are now to cease no more) had entirely ceas'd, without any diftinction at this time: therefore we may fairly infer, that fo had day and night too. Now this being granted, what could be in itſelf a more noble or enlivening emblem of hope, or a more rational and fignificant affurance againft a fecond deſtruction by rain, than that glorious bow of God in the clouds! which demonftrates, that all the rain, which at any time threatens the earth, can only affect fome particular portion of it; and is at the fame time fo peculiarly fitted to convey this hope, and this demonftration, to every region under heaven, and in every day REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 211 day throughout the whole year! which no other natural indication, in the univerſe, is fitted to do *. AND if that heavenly. bow was never before feen, till the moment that God made this declaration to Noah, (as it fhould feem from the very expreffion here uſed, that it was not); I do fet my bow in the cloud, and it shall be for a token of a covenant between me and the earth; and it shall come to paſs, when I bring a cloud over the earth, that the bow ſhall be ſeen in the cloud: and I will re- member my covenant which is between me and you, and every living creature of all flesh; and the water fhall no more become a flood to deftroy all flesh. I fay, on fuppofition, that Noah had never before feen a rain-bow, (a ſuppoſition which the above declaration fairly juſtifies), how muft that glorious pha- nomenon at once fill his eyes, with wonder and delight! and his heart, with joyful af- furance and that he never had feen any fuch appearance till that moment, is highly probable: fince, 'tis evident, there might Thoſe rains which now exhibit the rain-bow to our eyes, are gentle, refreſhing fhowers, plainly intended as bleffings to the earth; fuch bleffings, as, I think, cannot be fairly prefumed to have been bestowed upon it, in its accurfed ftate. therefore, from the rain-bow being now feen, it can by no means be fairly inferred, that it was feen before the deluge. And P 2 have 212 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. have been rain for many ages without a rain-bow: which arifes from the concur- rence of ſeveral circumftances, which we are under no neceffity of believing to have concurr'd, in the antediluvian ſtate of things: at leaſt, 'tis certain there could be no rain-bow without rain; and there is no con- vincing reafon to believe there was any rain before the flood: and this opinion is greatly ſtrengthned at leaft, from thefe words in the eleventh chapter of the epiftle to the Hebrews, and the feventh verfe: By faith Noah, being warned of God of things not feen as yet, moved with fear, prepared an ark for the faving of his houfe. Now if Noah had feen great rains and floods, drowning and overwhelming parti- cular portions of the earth, before this time, fuch as we now daily obferve, could the apoſtle properly call floods and devaſ- tations from rain, things not yet feen? From hence I infer, that Noah had ſeen no rain before the flood, at leaſt no fuch rains as we now daily fee; and confequently, no rain-bow. AND the tradition of antiquity con- cerning the rain-bow, feems ftrongly to confirm this opinion: for Iris, which is the name of the rain-bow with the Greeks, is faid REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 213 faid to be the daughter of Thaumas, (i. e. the daughter of wonder), and the meffen- ger of Jupiter, to carry his great oath to the other Gods, when they had offended. Now this feems to be a fable, plainly founded upon the folemn covenant now mentioned, which God made with man after the deluge: the covenant of God on this occafion, plain- ly implies the oath of God, as you may learn from Ifaiah liv. 9. where God, declaring his refolution of mercy to the Gentiles, ufeth theſe words; For this is as the waters of Noah to me; for as I have sworn that the waters of Noah fhould no more go over the earth, fo have I fworn, that I would not be wroth with thee, nor rebuke thee. WHEREAS then God, on this occafion, made a covenant with man by oath, and the rain-bow then firft feen with aftoniſh- ment in the heavens, was the ſignal of that covenant: what could be a more natural mythology founded upon thefe circum- ſtances, than that Iris was the daughter of wonder; and the messenger of Jupiter, to carry his folemn oath. * Vid. Hefiodi Theogon. v. 780. & feq. P 3 AND 214 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. AND thus having, I hope, fufficiently vindicated the fignificancy of this fign, and the wiſdom of God in appointing it, I fhall, in my next differtation, with God's affiftance, confider the teftimonies of antiquity relating to the deluge. DISq REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 215 DISSERTATION XIII. Of the concurrence of all antiquity with the Mofaic account of the flood. H AVING ended my differtations, Teflimonies con- cited by Joſe- phus and Eufe- bius. cerning the natural caufes, and provi- dential purpoſes of the deluge: I come now, to enquire, how far all the accounts of antiquity, confpire to the atteftation of this fact: beginning with the moſt antient. A WORK, tho' of fome labour, yet of little praiſe to the Author, or merit to the Reader, more than what may ariſe from faving him the trouble of revolving and comparing the collections of learned men, on this head; and deducing from them, that P 4 evi- 216 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. evidence, which, upon due confideration, muſt naturally and neceffarily refult from fuch an enquiry. AND here I take it for granted, that every candid reader muft, in this cafe, ad- mit the teftimony of fuch writers, as quoted others, extant, and well known, at the time of fuch quotations, without any con- tradiction of their cotemporaries, or the leaft imputation or fufpicion of fraud, in the point. Such, for example, are the quota- tions of JOSEPHUS and EUSEBIUS, from the writings of BEROSUS, NICHOLAUS DAMASCE- NUS, ABIDENUS, and others, extant and well known in their times. Which quotations, have this fair prefumption of truth: that if they had been any way falfified, they muft have deftroyed their author's credit, and defeated the very purpoſes which they were produc'd to eftabliſh. IT must be allowed, that quotations are fo far falfe, as they are imperfect, thro' defign; or miſtaken, thro' ignorance of original languages; and that we are fur- nifhed with inftances enough in both kinds, from many late writers, of great diftinction. But I verily think, that both JOSEPHUS and EUSEBIUS, are clear of both thefe imputations. They quote from Greek; and there is fome prefumption that they un- der- A REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 217 derſtood it, becauſe they wrote in it; and quote in it at large, from writers and writ- ings of all forts; and are fo far from being skilled in the modern art, of breaking in, and breaking off, in the middle of a fen- tence, that the quotations which I have had occafion to confult in them, are introduced and concluded in the utmoft fimplicity; and in the moſt natural chain of narration. And therefore they are clear of all fufpicion, except on the head of direct defign'd cor- ruption and, I think, their defign, their characters, and the ages in which they lived, abundantly acquit them upon that head. Their characters, and defigns, will be better feen hereafter; and as to the ages in which they wrote, it is well known that they were fufficiently learned, and prejudiced to their diſadvantage. Ages, which wanted neither able nor active adverfaries, to oppofe the truths they advanced; and to expoſe the leaft attempts to advance them, by any degree or colour of fallacy, or fraud; as ap- pears from many of their writings ftill extant. And as to fuch of them as carry any oppofi- tion to revelation, it is well known, that Chrif tians, (in confidence of their own integrity, and the goodneſs of their caufe), have not been afraid to preferve them, with as much care, as their own moft valued writings; infomuch that there is good reafon to believe, that the very beſt and bittereft Books, that ever were publifh'd 218 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. publiſh'd againſt divine revelation, are ſtill extant; either intire, or, at leaſt, in the full weight and energy of their objections. No Body that reads this, will, I believe, ima- gine that I mean thofe of modern Free- thinkers, which fome people are hardy enough to regard, but as humble imita- tions, at the beſt, - or wearifome repeti- tions! But tho' they impeach theſe eminent writers, as defective in the little circum- ftances of ftile, decency, skill, &c. they are, however, forced to do them this juftice, that they have diſcovered as little variety of malice upon this fubject, as of wit. No fault of modern infidels the ſubject was exhaufted. THIS being premifed, I now proceed to produce the teftimonies of antiquity to the point before us, in the beſt and cleareſt order I can. JOSEPHUS, in his firſt book againſt Apion, fays of the Chaldeans in general, that all their hiftories and monuments of learning, had a great conformity with the Jewish And of BEROSUS in particular, (who was prieft of Belts, and contemporary with Alexander the Great), he tells us, that as he wrote of the aftronomy and philofo- phy of the Chaldeans, for the ufe of the Grecians, he was well known to all who were REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 219 were any way converfant in things relating to literature, (here is an appeal to the whole learned world, for the truth of what he deli- vers on this point), and then adds theſe words; Now this Berofus, following the most antient writings, relateth the hiftory of the flood, and the deftruction of mankind, in it, in the fame manner with Mofes: Alfo of the ark in which Noah, the leader of our race, was faved; which was carried to the Summits of the Armenian mountains. HERE we are to take notice, that Jose- PHUS had before this, wrote to the fame purpoſe, of BEROSUS's teftimony concerning the deluge, (as fhall be fhewn immediately); and when he was attack'd by Apion, as raiſing the dignity of the Jewish nation above their deferts; they being a late upftart people, unknown to the reft of the world: He again appeals to the fame BEROSUS, for the truth of what MOSES related; and im- mediately after fhews, that BEROSUS was acquainted with the people of the Jews. Now this vouching BEROSUS's teftimony a fecond time, and in a warm diſpute with an adverfary, without the leaft hint that his firſt appeal to him had ever been conteſted, is furely a fair preſumption, that that appeal was not contefted: and that BEROSUS's ac- count 220 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. count of the deluge, was perfectly agreeable to that of MOSES. * In the firſt book of his Jewish antiquities, he tell us, that the Armenians called the place where the ark refted, anoßaтhpor, (the defcent), doubtlefs, becaufe Noah defcended from thence upon dry ground, and adds, there the inhabitants now fhew the remains of the ark, and that there is no improba- bility in this circumftance of the relation, fhall be clearly fhewn hereafter. c دو HE alfo adds, -"But of this deluge "and the ark, all they who wrote the "hiftories of the Barbarians, make mention, "of whom is BEROSUS the Chaldæan; for he, fpeaking of what concern'd the deluge, "relateth to this purpoſe; Now it is faid that fome part of that ſhip is yet extant in Armenia, in the mountain of the Cordyæi; and that fome carry about pieces of the Af phaltus which they take from it, and that men make uſe of what is fo carried about, for the most part, as a kind of charm to avert evil. JOSEPHUS alfo adds the teftimonies of many other writers to the fame purpoſe; * Anti Jud 1 1. c. 3. સ as REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 221 as follows; "But of theſe things alfo "HIERONIMUS the Egyptian, makes men- "tion; who alfo wrote the Phoenician "archæology; MNASEAS alfo, and many "others. Alfo NICHOLAUS of Damafcus, cc gives us an hiſtorical relation of theſe "things, in this manner. THERE is above Minyas a great mountain in Armenia, called Baris, to which it is reported, that many flying at the time of the deluge, were there Javed; and that a certian perfon, carried in an ark, arrived on the fummit of the mountain: and that the reliques of the wood were preferved a long time. And pof- fibly this may be the fame man, of whom MOSES, the lawgiver of the Jews, wrote. IT is generally deemed difadvantageous to an author, to be defended before he is at- tacked but as infidels have found a new way of blafting the credit of writers, not by critical differtations, or proofs of ignorance, or infincerity, (for this would be appealing to reaſon and truth), but by the unanſwer- able argument of fcorn and light contempt, it will not, I hope, be amifs, on all occa- fions, to place the characters of authors in a true light that the candid reader may judge for himself; and diftinguifh as he ought between infolence and fuperior light. And beſides this, perhaps, the beft way of deal- ing 222 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. ing with infidelity, (as with other diſeaſes), is to prevent it. THERE is no fubject in this world, upon which, abſtracted and fpeculative men, may not refine, far above common fenfe, and common conceptions. But men of plain talents; will, I believe, be at a loſs to think, why any writer fhould fo diligently compile fuch a heap of teftimonies, and with fo many particularities, upon one point: and this in a court, where the language he wrote in, was familiar, (as the Greek language and learning was in that of the Cæfars), and to an emperor, and in an age, and country, perfectly well acquainted with the then ſtate of the world, but from one of theſe twÒ ends; either to afcertain an important truth, beyond all poffibility of doubt, make himſelf contemptible and deteftable to all mankind, as the vileft and fhameleffeft impoftor, that ever lived. And that JOSE- or to PHUS was never confider'd under this cha- racter, in the Roman court, but quite other- wife, is, I believe, paft all doubt. JOSEPHUS was a man of great quality, as well as learning; and not altogether clear of the fufpicion of being a Free-thinker; at leaſt, if examining all things, with great induftry and attention, and then adhering to that which he thought beft, can juftly entitle any man REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 223 man to that character. He defpifed riches, and gave great proofs both of prudence, probity, and piety *. Proofs which needed no atteftation at the court of Rome. He was a man of fortitude, and when neceffity called, he hazarded his life, for the religion and liberties of his country, and he de- fended his religion, with his pen, at a time when both that and his country were ruined: without the leaft profpect of the reſtoration of either. I own, I cannot easily fufpect fuch a man of impofture, (nor can I learn that ever he was fufpected) efpecially, an impoſture which implies equal ftupidity and depravity in the author! as an infinity of falfe quotations, neceffarily muſt. And if JOSEPHUS's veracity is to be depended upon, we then have the teftimonies of all the antient nations, of the then known world, who had any early learning amongſt them, full to this point of the deluge. Chaldæans, Egyptians, Syrians, Phoenicians, Jews! with no more variety, than is com- monly obferved, in relation to all other facts confeffedly true. And if we find no clear hiftorical accounts of this matter, among the Greeks, we fhould remember, that learning came late amongſt them; and that they had no hiftories, memorials, or records of any kind, till long after the Trojan war. * See his life. And that 224 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. that all that period of time, antecedent to this æra, is allow'd to be fabulous. And therefore we cannot reafonably expect any account of this point, amongſt them, but fuch as is involved in fables. And that there are memorials enough of that kind, to be met with in their mythology, will, I hope, be fully fhewn hereafter. IN the next place, EUSEBIUS* fupplies us with an extract from ABYDENUS, concerning the deluge, to this purpoſe, viz. that Chronos (or Saturn) foretold Sifithrus, of a vaft flood of rain, that was to fall; and com- manded him, to hide whatever learning he could compile, in Heliopolis, a city of the Sippari; that he obeyed, and fail'd imme- diately towards Armenia; that the divine prediction came quick upon him; and that on the third day, after the tempeft was ceafed, he made an experiment by birds, to find whether they could fee any land emerg- ing from the water: and that they launching out into an uninterrupted ocean, and not knowing which way to fteer, returned to Sifitbrus. That others were ſent out after them, and that the third trial was fuccefs- ful. The birds returning with their feet, (not as the common tranflations have it, * Repar. evangel. 1. 9. c. 12. Paris ed. their REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 225 their wings) all mudded. He then adds, that the gods made him (i. e. Sifithrus) dif- appear; but the fhip arrived at Armenia ; and afforded the people of the country, amulets of the wood, to drive away dif eafes. NOR IS ABYDENUS the only hiftorian, that records this account of Sifithrus. ALEXAN- der PolyhistoR* gives the fame account in POLYHISTOR ſubſtance; tho' with fome more particulari- ties. He fays, that Sifithrus eſcaped a great deluge; and takes notice, that his fafety was owing to the premonition of Saturn. That he eſcaped by means of an ark, which he had provided for the purpofe; in which alfo, birds, beafts, and creeping things were preſerved with him. HERE then are two other teftimonies, dif- fering in the manner, and in the ftile, re- markably from one another, and from all the reft: and yet agreeing, in the main, with Mofes; That there was a flood: That it was foretold: That a certain perfon was faved from it; and faved in an ark, or ſhip. And the ſuperſtitions of the coun- try, (mention'd by ABYDENUS), plainly im- ply an opinion, that there was fomething Apud Cyril. contra Julian. 1. 1. е facred 226 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. i facred in that veffel. And what could fo naturally fuggeft to them, that the wood of it, fhould be an amulet againſt evil, as a conftant tradition, that this veffel was pro- tected from all evil, by the immediate pro- vidence of God? EUSEBIUS alfo fupplies us with another teftimony from the fame ALEXANDER POLY- HISTOR, which, I think, is out of the reach of all reaſonable exception; as it is the tefti- mony of a candid and impartial writer, quoting the teftimony of one who wrote in profeffed enmity to the Jews. THIS ALEXANDER POLYHISTOR, whom EUSEBIUS reprefents, as a writer of great talents and learning, eminently known to all men of letters, among the Greeks, quotes MELO in theſe words; But Melo, who wrote induftriously against the Jews, fays, That after the deluge, a man who furvived, with his fons, being expelled from his poffef- fions by his country-men, traverfing the inter- mediate region, came to the mountainous part of Syria, then defart, and that after three generations, Abraham was born, &c. Now this feems to be a jumbled account, made up of of a confuſion of what paſs'd at the deluge, with Terah's migration with his fon Abraham from his own country. But thus much REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 227 much must confeffedly be deduced from it; that there was a deluge; that one man and his fons eſcaped it ; and that this man afterwards refided in Armenia. It muſt be owned, that this account contradicts the Mofaic in fome circumftances: And could we expect that an enemy fhould agree with him in all? It is fufficient to our pur- pofe, that it confirms the main point in queftion. THESE are the teftimonies cited by EUSE- BIUS, upon the point before us. I will not pretend to acquit him, or any other mortal, of human infirmities; but this I will fay, that he is clear of all fufpicion of fraud in thefe citations: I, INASMUCH as he hath eſcaped the cenfure of his cotemporaries upon that head. 2dly, INASMUCH as he hath never, that I know of, been detected, or even arraign'd of fraud by any fubfequent writers, tho' he hath fufficiently been hated by many of them. SCALIGER, his mortal enemy, im- peaches his judgment, but without any imputation upon his integrity; and many zealous Chriftians of all ages, were fo in- cenfed, 228 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. ! cenſed, * and are ftill fo incenſed againſt him, for herefy, and have carried their revilings on that head, fo far beyond any foundation of truth, that had it been poffible to blaft his credit, infidels had long fince been faved the toil of endeavouring it. 3dly, His character entirely acquits him to me, and, I think, muft to all reaſonable men. AND 4thly, His whole conduct through- out this whole work of the evangelick pre- paration. THE reader, I hope, will indulge me a little upon theſe two laft heads. IN the first place then, EUSEBIUS knew how to think for himfelf (which, I will not prefume to fay, is always the cafe of all thofe that differ from him). WHOEVER perufes his evangelick prepara- tions, will find, that he ranfacks the learn- ing of the whole world! examines the theo- logy of all nations; fhews where they are faulty, and where right; examines the prin- * Jerom. Photius. Baronius, &c. See alfo the dedication of his Præpar. Evan. Parif. edit. 2 ciples REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 229 ciples and opinions of all the philofophers, of all fects: compares them, and upon. the compariſon, prefers. Shews the Pla- tonick, to be far preferable to all the reft, and why. Proves by a great variety of arguments, and compafs of learning,. that it was derived from the Jews. - Shews where it agrees, and where it differs; that Plato copied from Moſes: tho' not without mixture of fable and error. That where he agrees with him, his philofophy is right, and rational; and his theology, worthy of God. That where he differs from him, he is immoral, erroneous, and impious. And affigns this exprefly (on feveral occafions) as the reafon, why he re- jected the philofophy of Plato, and embraced that of the Jews. At ALL this confider'd, I hope, I may be allow'd to fay, that EUSEBIUS knew how to think for himſelf. I will venture to fay more, if they who defpife his autho- rity, thought half as much, and as freely as he did, they would revere it more. leaft, I hope, they will forgive my in- firmity in thinking fo, in thinking, that they would then be as much better believers, as they would unquestionably be wifer men. Q 3 BUT 230 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. BUT EUSEBIUS did not not content him- felf with examining the wifdom of the whole world, and preferring the Jewish upon the compariſon. He thought it alfo necef- fary, to enquire into truth of fact. He the confider'd, that MOSES related many ftrange things; the creation, paradife, the firft pair, the delufion of the ferpent, the longevity of the firſt men, their corruption, and the deftruction it drew down, in the deluge, the building of Babel foon after, defeat of that attempt, the difperfion of mankind, the defcent of the Jews from Abraham, &c. He concluded very juftly, that if fuch men and things ever exifted, or fuch ſtrange events ever came to paſs, there muft furely be ſome traditions, monuments, or memorials of them in the world. And accordingly he examines the archives, and ranfacks the hiftories of all ages, and na- tions; their antiquities and traditions; and finds, that tho' they all differ'd vaftly from one another, in the circumftances of times, places, and names, yet that they all agreed with the Mofaic account in the main. It was obvious for him, to apprehend, that the difference of languages, and the different care or negligence of nations in preſerving memorials, muft, of neceflity, caufe a va- riety in the forementioned circumſtances, of times, places, and names: and that fuch a variety, REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 231 variety, was ſo far from prejudicing, that it greatly confirm'd the truth of facts. And if he once confider'd the authenticity of hiftories, and compared the fidelity of na- tions, and their care in keeping the memo- rials of preceding times, it was impoffible not to prefer the national care and fidelity of the Jews in this point, to that of all other nations in the world. If, BECAUSE they had publick officers appointed for this purpoſe; and both theſe officers, and the nation in general, were utterly regardleſs of all accounts of other countries; and fo could neither borrow nor mix any of their own with them. 2dly, BECAUSE the original book, in which the hiftory of the world, and their own nation, was contained, was profeffedly, and beyond all fufpicion or poffibility of doubt, both written and publiſhed in the prefence of their forefathers. 3dly, BECAUSE it was beyond all queſtion, the oldeſt book in the world. AND 4thly, BECAUSE it was kept with more care than any other book in the world; in the moſt facred recefs of the tabernacle, firſt, and afterwards, of the temple; and continued there, till their national captivity Q 4 and 232 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. } and difperfion; and at the fame time, copies of this book, were in the hands of all the people: every king, at his acceffion to the throne, was obliged with his own hand, to tranſcribe a copy of this book, from the original; and every private perſon, to get a great part of it, by heart. And every man amongſt them, bore about him, from his earlieſt infancy, a fure mark of the na- tional regard to it, from father to fon, from age to age. It was read conftantly and regularly to them all, at ftated and fix'd times, by men appointed and maintained for that purpoſe. It was the great bufinefs of their lives, to ſtudy and to excel in thè knowledge of it. And they who did fo with moſt fuccefs, were always in the higheſt eſteem amongſt them. BESIDES all this, this one book, was their fole rule of duty, private, and publick. Their fole magna charta, code, and ftatute- book. For all their rights, privileges, and publick adminiftration of juſtice. IN one word, any man that confidered this point, with due attention, could not but find, that it was their fole rule of domeftick life, civil government, and publick worſhip; and confequently, that it was impoffible to falfify it, in any thing material; forafmuch, as there was a neceffity of appealing to it, in REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 233 in ten thouſand inftances, every day of the year. AND if, after all this, EUSEBIUS acted irrationally, in accepting this book as genuine and authentick, and believing the facts contained in it, there is no fuch thing as a reaſonable conduct, or a rational evi- dence, in this world. I BEGG leave to mention fome other cir- cumſtances of EUSEBIUS's character, — Any man that confiders the hiftory of his times, and of his life, muft, I think, find him as eminent, as any man of his own, or, per- haps, of any other age, for temper, mode- ration, dignity, difintereftedneſs, and a ge- nerous contempt of wealth and grandeur: and, I muft own, that thefe are to me in the place of ten thouſand proofs of inte- grity. I cannot ſuſpect that fpirit, of fraud or artifice; fufpect did I fay ? I retract the expreffion; I cannot but revere the memory, and venerate the vertue, the primitive vertue of that man, who could, from the influence of a good confcience, look down upon grandeur ! could, in the heighth of princely favour, refuſe the bounty of an emperor, to his epifcopal church; and endow it liberally with his own! who could refuſe the richeft and the nobleſt biſhoprick of all the Eaft, (tho' elected and invited 234 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 1 invited to it in the moſt honourable and engaging manner) upon a principle of apof- tolick integrity. I IN the next place, I hope, I may be allow'd, with all humility, to fuppofe, that this author was not an ideot. I would not offend the more enlighten'd reader, mean, not an ideot in any thing, but his Chriftian faith. Nor can I learn from the hiftories of thofe times, that bifhops were then generally deemed abandoned, and void of principles. And yet, unleſs EUSEBIUS was fo, to the moſt ſhameleſs degree imagi- nable, how is it poffible to imagine, that he fhould dare to forge or falfify numberlefs quotations, from authors then in the hands of all men of learning, declaring at the fame time, that they were in the hands of all men of learning; and perfectly known to them. And that he fhould do this, in a language then univerfally known! in that very act, challenging the whole world to detect him! and at the fame time fupplying them with the means to do it! I confefs, I am a believer, I mean, a Chriftian believer: but they who are not, will, I hope, forgive me, if I cannot go their lengths in credulity! I cannot believe this of EUSEBIUS, becaufe I think it were incredible of Diagoras, the greateſt infidel now alive! of I OWN, REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 235 } I own, that all biſhops are not now in all the veneration I could wifh them. Men are fufficiently inclined to credit things to their diſadvantage; yet I fhould imagine him very credulous, who could believe this of a Christian bishop, even now! a bishop, living in this remote region of the earth, and writing in the language of it; a lan- guage confined to itſelf, and its colonies! I fhould imagine that fuch a man would con- tent himſelf, even in this happier age of free-thinking, with being filently in the wrong, without proclaiming his fhame and fetting his feal to it! and what feems to me fo incredible of a modern biſhop, now, and here, is, I ſhould think, much more fo, of a primitive Chriftian bishop; (a biſhop who could refuſe the fee of Antioch); in an age, when men feem to have been ferious in religion. A biſhop living in the light of Afia, (in luce Afia) as Cicero expreffes it. And himſelf then one of the greateft lights. of Afia! writing in a language known to the whole world! AND as the character of EUSEBIUS fhews him fuperior to all exception, his conduct throughout this whole work of the evangelick preparation, proves him yet more fo, if pof- fible. He undertook this great work, for the converfion of the heathen world; ap- pealing 236 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. pealing to books in their own hands; Can there be a fairer mark of an honeft conduct, of open honeſty, than this? If he had falfified in the appeal, muft he not of necef- fity defeat his own purpofe, with infamy to himſelf, and to his caufe? JOSEPHUS quoted a great number of works and writings in his hiftory, and in his difpute with Apion, (that is, in effect, with the heathen world): but EUSEBIUS, works and writers without number! I will venture to fay, not lefs than four-fcore, in his fifteen books of the evangelick preparation; every quotation, either forged, or falfified, is a mark of impofture; if he is an impoftor, he can't have given lefs than a thouſand proofs of it. He quotes JOSEPHUS for many authorities, cited, and vouched unreproved, long before. And he himfelf And he himſelf quotes other authorities from fome of the fame books;--- he quotes Clemens Alexandrinus, at large, who had himſelf quoted authorities, without number; and many other authors in the fame manner; a ftrange complicated feries of forgeries a long chain link'd one into another, and yet no appearance of prevari- cation or corruption! no detection, even from anachronifm or inconfiftency! In one word, if this man hath forged and falfified, he hath done it in a manner, which no REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 237 no other man ever did from the foundation of the world. If he hath done fo, it is a problem far above my abilities, to explain why he hath (to ufe fchines's expreffion to Demofthenes) thus abused all the marks and characters of honesty, to all the purposes of villany, and why no man hath ever vindi- cated this abuſe. THE fum of all, is this, 1 WHAT, I think, in itſelf utterly incredi- ble, I could believe of no man alive or dead. What I could believe of no man, I could lefs believe of a Chriftian biſhop now. What I could believe of no Chriftian biſhop now, I could yet lefs believe of EUSEBIUS. DIS- 238 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. DISSERTATION XIV. Of other teftimonies relating to the deluge. I HAVE, in the preceding differ- tation, defignedly omitted a tefti- mony from Berufus, cited by Sir Walter Raleigh, (b. 1. c. 7.) inafmuch as the book now extant under the name of that writer, is juftly fup- poſed to be corrupted; nor have I been able to learn upon what authority that great man judged this paffage genuine; but that he eſteemed it fuch, I think is evident, from his quoting it without any mark or ſuſpicion of reproach. For foon after he hath cited it, he adds thefe words, " But Berofus "6 (who, after Mofes, was one of the moſt "antient, however he hath been fince de- "formed and corrupted) doth, in the ſub- "ftance of all, agree with Mofes as touch- ing 3 eri REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 239 ing the general flood, taking from thence "the beginning of his hiftory in theſe "words;- Before that famous deftruction "of waters by which the world univerfal << perished: witneffing withal, that Noah, "with his wife Titea, and his three fons "with their three wives (in all eight per- "fons) were only ſaved. " THAT Sir Walter Raleigh was a great man, and a good critick, will not, I believe, be denied and that he never was fufpected of fuperftition, credulity, or unreaſonable par- tiality to religion, is undoubted: taking it for granted then, that this quotation from Berofus is genuine, I think the building of Babel, by the fons of Noah by Titea (foon after the flood), with tower upon tower, might have given the moft natural occafion to the mythology of the invafion of heaven by the Titans, heaping one mountain upon another. I Now proceed to enquire for fome memo- rials of the deluge in the Greek mythology. And, I think, we need ſearch no further on this head, than their own fabulous accounts of the two deluges of Ogyges and Deucalion: following one another at the diftance of about two hundred years. Now 240 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. Now particular deluges, in which whole mountainous regions (fuch as Attica and Theffaly) were overwhelmed with water, are (as I before obſerved) attended with more difficulties, and confequently, are much leſs credible than an univerfal deluge. And therefore, fince both theſe are ſuppoſed by them to have happen'd in that age, which is confeffedly obſcure: long before they had the uſe of letters, or publick records of any kind, they deſerve to be no otherwiſe re- garded, than as traditions of the univerfal deluge, corrupted agreeably to the ignorance of the times, and genius of that vain people, who vaunted their own antiquity above all other nations; and becauſe the oldeſt na- tions had memorials of one deluge, which drowned the world, they refolved to be diftin- guifh'd by the fingularity of two deluges; but then we muft do them this juftice, that they always confidered Deucalion's deluge as univerfal in which he faved himſelf, his wife, and fome few others on the moun- tains of Theffaly, and fo was regarded as the reſtorer of mankind, as Strabo cer- tifies * ; CRITICKS alfo find, with fufficient ap- pearance of truth, their Bacchus, (antiently * L. 9. Boachus) REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 241 Boachus) in Noah, the firſt planter of vines; one letter changed either by accident or de- fign, makes all the difference between their names; and Noah's planting the vine, and fubfequent drunkennefs, recorded in the fcripture, is foundation enough for all the reft of the fable of Bacchus. THEIR Janus alfo, who ſaw before and behind, is doubtlefs no other than Noah; who faw the ante-diluvian, and poft-diluvian worlds. And Sir Walter Raleigh obferves, that this name might very naturally be de- rived from the Hebrew word [jain], which fignifies wine. NOAH ſeems alfo to be fully figured out to us under the character of Saturn. At WHO is repreſented at one time, as driven down from Olympus by his fon. At ano- ther, as devouring all his children, except three, which were concealed from him. another, as dividing the whole world be- tween his three remaining fons. And at another, as the common parent of mankind, and reclaiming the favage lives of the firſt mortals, who lived on mountains, and fed upon acorns : giving them laws, and teaching them culture, with feveral other circumſtances; fuch as only one lan- guage among mankind in his time, R his being 242 REVELATION Examin'd, &c. being a teacher of juftice,--- and author of that law which forbad to behold the gods naked * THE defcent of Noah from the high mountain, on which the ark refted; the deftruction of all his own family with the rest of mankind, except his three fons ; and the diftribution of the world afterwards among these three fons, and their defcen- dants, and he himfelf being the parent of all the race of mankind then in the world, and their lawgiver in the character of common parent, being alfo an husbandman, and teaching the art of cultivating the earth to his fons; his nakedneſs being feen by one of his wicked fons, and the curfe denounced upon him for it. All theſe circumſtances united, very naturally gave rife to all theſe fabulous accounts of Saturn, among a people who delighted in fiction, and defpifed plain truths. IF we proceed from the mythology of the Greeks, to the more ferious writings of their philofophers and philologers, we fhall find not only clear undiiguifed memorials of the deluge amongst them, but likewife fuch as exactly correfpond with the Mofaic ac- I fhall mention but three of thefe Plato, Plutarch, and Lucian. count. writers, * See Bochart's Phaleg. 1. 1. c. 1. PLATO's REVELATION Examin'd, &c. 243 PLATO's teftimony is thus quoted by Sir Walter Raleigh (1. 1. c. 7. §. 4.) "And "Plato in Timeo produceth an Egyptian prieft, who recounted to Solon, out of the (6 holy books of Egypt, the ftory of the "flood univerfal, which (faith he) happened "long before the Grecian inundations. PLATO alſo mentions the deluge in the third book of his laws. PLUTARCH's teftimony is thus cited by Ray, in his confequences of the deluge, p. 65. “PLUTARCH, in his book de folentia "animalium, tells us, that thoſe who have "written of Deucalion's flood, report, that "there was a dove fent out of the ark by "Deucalion, which returning again into the "ark, was a fign of the continuance of the "flood; but flying quite away, and not re- "turning any more, was a fign of ferenity, "and that the earth was drained. THE fame author quotes Lucian's tefti- mony upon this head, p. 67. in the follow- ing manner; "LUCIAN, in his Timon, and in his "book de Dea Syria, fets forth the particu- R 2 < Vols. Pope's 14 BOOKS Sold by W. PARKER. Pope's Homer's Iliads. 6 Vols. Witty, on the Sphere. Odyffes. Vols. 5 Mifcellanies. 2 Vols. Pettit's Rights of Commons afferted. Vifion of Purgatory. Place agt. Rights of the Church. Mr.Whiston. Rawlett on the Sacrament. Dialogues. Reflections on Men, Prejudices. Reeve's Apologies. 2 Vols. Rapin's Reflections on Ariftotle. Rochester's Familiar Letters. Woodward's State of Phyfick. Contra Camerarii. Roman Urns. Wotton's Mifna. 2 Vols. Wifeman's Surgery. 2 Vols. Whitby, on the Love of God. C Vindication Mofaic Creation. Modern Deifm. Ward's British Hudibras. Wilkin's Real Characters. Worley's Reply to Palmer. Wooley's Parents Bleſſing, &c. Wits Common-wealth. Woodward's Fair Warning to a careless World. Winwood's Memoirs. Walker, of Education. - Examples: Wit and Eloquence. Wars of Sweden. Wingate's Arithmetick. Wells, of antient and prefent Geography. Walker's English Particles. Sir George Wheeler of Churches. Books in TWENTY-FOURS Ountefs of Moreton's Devotions. Biſhop Patrick's Book for Beginners. Ignoramus, Comoedia coram Rege Jacobi & Totius Anglia mag- natibus per Acad. Cantab. New-Years Gift. Buchanan's Poemeta. Virgilius. Chriftian Pattern. Practice of Piety. Horatius. Warmfley's Box of Spikenard Terentius. The following Books were printed for the late Mrs. MARY KETTILBY, and are now Sold by WILLIAM PARKER. ARchbishop Sharpe's Sermons. 4 Vols. Bishop Moor's Sermons. 2 Vols. A Collection of above three hundred Receipts in Cookery, Phylick, and Surgery, for the Ufe of all good Wives, tender Mothers, and careful Nurfes. By feveral Hands. The Fourth Edition: To which is added, a fecond Part, containing a great Number of excellent Receipts, for Preferving and Conferving of Sweet-Meats, c. Biſhop Blackhall's Sermons upon ſeveral Occafions. Vol. II. The Church Catechifm explained for the Uſe of the Dio- cefe of St. Asaph. By the Right Reverend Father in God Will. Beveridge, D. D late Bishop of St. Asaph. Sixth Edition. Memoirs BOOKS Sold by W. PARKER. 15 Memoirs and Reflections upon the principal Paffages of the Reign of Lewis XIVth of France, and the Character of Per- fons chiefly concerned therein. By the Marquis De la Farre. Tranflated from the French. The Faith and Practice of the Church of England-Man. The Ninth Edition. Price 4 d. Principles of the Cyprianic Age, with Regard to Epifcopal Power and Jurifdiction, afferted and recommended from the genuine Writings of St. Cyprian himſelf, and his Cotemporaries. Hiſtory of Romances. A Differtation on the Extreme Folly and Danger of Infidelity; occafioned by a late virulent Book, entitled, A Difcourfe on the Grounds and Reafons of the Chriftian Religion. By Thomas Curteis, Rector of Wrotham in Kent. Second Edition. Pr. 2 s. A Brief Expoftulation with the Author of the new Literal Scheme of Prophecy, publiſh'd in Defence of his former Book, entitled, A Difcourfe on the Grounds and Reaſons of the Chri- ftian Religion. Price 6 d. Advice to a Son at the Univerfity, defign'd for Holy Orders. Pr. Is. Genethlia: A Poem on the Bleffed Nativity; defign'd to excite an aweful Senfe of Religion, both in the indolent and unbeliev- ing Part of Mankind. Price 1 S. Eironodia: A Poem; facred to Peace, and the promoting of Human Happiness. Price 1 s. Two Differtations; one on the Unity of the Catholick Church; the other on the Preference of Charity to Knowledge and Faith. Price 1 s. 6 d. The Kentish Farrier; wherein are contain'd, the beſt approv'd Medicines for curing the most inveterate Distempers in Horfes, Bullocks, Hogs, &c. By Thomas Trowell, near Forty Years a Practitioner in Farriery, at Tenterden in Kent. Price 1 s. 6 d. An Inquiry whether a general Practice of Virtue tends to the Wealth of Poverty, Benefit or Difadvantage of a Feople? In which the Pleas offered by the Author of the Fable of the Bees, or, Private Vices, Publick Benefits, for the Ufefulnefs of Vice and Roguery, are confidered; with fome Thoughts concerning a Tole- ration of Publick Stews. By the late Mr. Bluett. Pr. 2s. 6d. The Chriſtian Religion nor founded on Allegory: Or, A Vindi- cation of our Faith from the Falfhood objected againſt it, in a late Difcourfe of the Grounds and Reafons of the Chriftian Re- ligion. Price 1 s. 6d. The Grounds of the Roman Catholick Faith Examined. In 2 Dialogues,between an English Cath. and a Roman Catholick. Pr. 6 d. A plain Practical Expolition on the Lord's Prayer, by Way of Queſtion and Anſwer. Collected from the best Authors, for the Ufe of the Poor. Price 3 d. or 20 s. per Hundred. On the Apoſtles Creed. Price 6 d. The 16 BOOKS Sold by W. PARKER. The Neceffity of conſtant Attendance on the Publick Worship of God, and of Chriſtian Communion. In a Dialogue between a Country Gentleman and a Farmer. 2 Edit. Pr. 3 d. or 20 s. per Hun. Dr. Stewart's Sermon on Divine Grace. Price 4d. The Inſtitution of an Holy Life: Containing Directions for fpending the Lord's Day; with Private Devotions. Price 6 d. Dr. Comber's Difcourfe againſt Duelling. 2 Edition. Price 6d. Mr. Hewerdine's Common Prayer no Engliſh Maſs-Book. Pr. 3 d. His Diſcourſe fent home to the Abfenters from the Church of England. Price 6 d. Bartlemy-Fair: Or, An Inquiry after Wit, &c. By Mr. Wotton. Price I s. 6 d. A Defence of the Canon of the Old Teftament: Or, An Anſwer to Mr. Whifton's Attempts to prove that the Canticles is not a Sacred Book, &c. By W. Itchener, M.A. Rector of Chriſtian Malford, Wilts. Price 8 d. An Account of the Samaritans; very proper to be bound up with Dr. Prideaux's Connection. Price 1 s. 6d. A Trip to the Moon. By Mr. Murtagh Mc Dermont. Con- taining fome Obfervations and Reflections made by him during his Stay in that Planet, upon the Manners of the Inhabitants.. Printed at Dublin, and Reprinted at London. Price 1 s. Self-Murther and Duelling, the Effects of Cowardice end Atheiſm. To which are added, Some Reflections on the modern Practice of Inoculating. Price 1 s. Dr. Biffe's Sermon before the Sons of the Clergy. Price 6 d. The Country Curate to the Country People; endeavouring a plain Account of the Crofs in Baptifm, Kneeling at the Holy Communion, the Wedding-Ring, and the Surplice: With a brief Introduction, fhewing the true State of the Toleration; fitted to the meaneſt Capacities. Price 6 d. A Defence of the Church of England from Prieſtcraft, in Vindication of the conteſted Clauſe of the XXth Article. Ex- tracted out of the Vindication of the Church of England from the Afperfions of a late Libel, intituled, Prieftcraft in Perfection, c. By the Autbor of the Vindication. Price 6 d. A Defence of the Trinity. Price 1 s. The Church-Catechifm more briefly Explained, by Way of Queſtions and Anfwers, and confirmed by Scripture Proofs. Divided in 5 Parts, and 14 Sections: Wherein a brief and plain Account is given of, I. The Baptiſmal Covenant. II. The Chriftians Faith. III. The Ten Commandments. IV. The Lord's Prayer. V. The Two Covenants. VI. Confirmation. By John Lewis, A. M. Minifter of Meregate in Kent. Price 3 d. or 20s. per Hundred. The laft Advice and Counſel of a Father to his Children. Price 38. or 20 s. per Hundred. The Church - Catechifm, with Explanation and Scripture Proofs, for the Uſe of a Private Pariſh. 5th Edition. Price 3 d. or 20 s. per Hundred. UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN 3 9015 02449 3150 ARTES 1837 SCIENTIA VERITAS LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN TVEBOR SHQUERIS PENINSULAM AMINAMI` CIRCUMSPIGL THE DUFFIELD LIBRARY THE GIFT OF THE TAPPAN PRESBY- TERLAN ASSOCIATION A 55065 4