T ET E EFFECTS OF BEER U P O N THOSE WHO MAKE AND DRINK II A STAT IS TIC A. L S K ETC H RY G-- TIEBCOTMIA INTINT. NEW YORK : | THE UNITED STATES BREWERS ASSOCIATION. 1886. | T IEEE TEB EFFECTS OF BEER –~ U P O N THOSE WHO MAKE AND DRINK IT. A STAT IS TIC A. L S K E T C H BY jº, # , , ; ſº r ſº tº tº 5 °. G*TEHCOM.A.ININT. asº NEW YORK : THE UNITED STATES BREWERS’ ASSOCIATION. 1886. N. Y. EconomicAL PRINTING Co., 24 VESEY ST., NEw York. THE E F FE CTS OF E E E R U PON THOSE WHO MAKE AND DRINK IT. “The constant use of beer is found to produce a species of degeneration of most of the organism, profound and very deceptive. Fatty deposits, dimin- ished circulation, congestions, general disturbances of the functions of the different organs, inflammation of both the liver and kidney, are, one or all, constantly present.” “ The foregoing extract from a text-book on physiology is a typical specimen of the absurdities with which biased or ignorant teachers are permitted to fill the heads of school-children. Very many writers and public lecturers, unless they derive their information directly from one of the many self-constituted medi- cal authorities, unknown beyond the limits of the hamlets in which they minister to science, make use of just such groundless and absurd averments in order to prove that beer is an unwhole- some beverage. If what is claimed in this quotation be true, there ought to be no difficulty in producing medical statistics in support of it. But no such proof has ever been produced, for the very simple reason that it does not exist. In the absence of statistical testi- mony, an assertion like that quoted might be accepted as the individual opinion of a medical practitioner; and as such would deserve as much credence as the practitioner’s reputation for pro- fessional skill, exactness of observation and incorruptibility of judgment might warrant. But in our case, not even this much can be admitted, because methodical investigations, conducted by institutions of learning and the governments of many countries, have taken the matter out of the domain of empiricism and specu- * Lessons on the human body ; by O. M. Brands. 4. lation, by scientifically and statistically establishing the fact that beer is a wholesome beverage. Long before these investigations were undertaken, however, this fact was generally known; and the student of history would find it an easy task to adduce proof of its having been well appreciated. In all ages beer-drinking nations have been remark- . able for unusual intrepidity, great strength, vigor and vitality. It was not until after the introduction of ardent spirits into Eng- land, that the enervation of the masses was spoken of in connection with intemperate drinking-habits. The proceedings of the first Congress of the United States, and the state papers submitted to that body, prove that the most eminent among the founders of our republic appreciated what was then styled “the moralizing tendency and salubrious nature of fermented liquors.” In 1789, the legislature of Massachusetts passed an act encouraging the manufacture of beer for the reason—set forth in the preamble— that the “wholesome qualities of malt liquors greatly recommend them to general use as an important means of preserving the health of the citizens.” In colonial days, long before Dr. Rush began his agitation in favor of beer, the law-makers strove by all means at their command to popularize beer for sanitary reasons. When, in 1759, parliament had under consideration the propo- sition to re-enact a law of the preceding session, prohibiting malt distillation, petitions were received from the mayors and alder- men of nearly all the larger cities of Great Britain, London among them, setting forth that the law, which they begged to have re-enacted, had “produced the happiest consequences upon the morals, behavior, industry and health of the lower classes,” by winning them back to the use of malt-liquors. Such evi- dences might be multiplied at will. But they would not be to the point in the present undertaking. It is known that alcoholism is a modern disease, and that methodical enquiry and observation were not directed to the effects of intoxicating drinks upon the human mind and body until after the ravages of alcoholism—acknowledged by all med- ical writers of repute to be the result of the excessive use of dis- tilled spirits—had attracted the attention of the statesmen and lawmakers. Now let us see what the results of these enquiries and observa- tions are. 5 In Belgium, temperance Societies, aided by the government and the Académie royal de médicine de Belgique, inves- tigated the effects of the different intoxicating beverages upon the health of the masses, and came to the conclusion that the use of beer, being in every way a perfectly wholesome drink, ought to be encouraged by proper fiscal legislation. While waiting for such legislation, these temperance societies erected model brew- eries; and offered prizes and promised their patronage and support to brewers who would brew beer of the quality-standard estab- lished by them. The Académie de médicine of Paris, through its most emi- nent members, inaugurated a movement in favor of the encour- agement of the brewing industry in France; and such scientists as Lancereaux, Marvaud, Pasteur, and Bourchardat, after having Scientifically investigated the matter, are now engaged in the work of convincing the French people that beer is an excellent drink, possessing many qualities that contribute to the health of those who use it. The plan of action of these scientific temper- ance advocates was officially stated by Dr. Lancereaux at the recent International Temperance Congress held at Antwerp. It culminates in the determination to have all taxes removed from the manufacture and sale of beer. And all this in the face of the fact, that viticulture forms an essential part of the wealth of France. .." The medical inquiries made in Holland led to the conclusion that beer is an entirely healthy beverage; and as early as 1877 the organ of the French temperance societies, Za Temperance, reported, that the object of the Dutch sister societies was, “de dégrever autant que possible la biére indigène,” that is, to render domestic beer as free as possible from taxation. The question of combating alcoholism was not discussed any- where with more thoroughness than in Switzerland. The Fed- eral legislature, the entire executive machinery, the statistical bureau, the sanitary commissions, the inspectors of factories, in short, all branches of the Federal and cantonal governments were engaged in the solution of this great question. Everything that pertains to the life of the people was looked into. Their food, their common drink, their dwellings, their social habits, their occupations; in short, all things that could in any manner throw light upon the subject, were investigated. The material 6 collected during these protracted enquiries covers, in small type, over two thousand 12mo pages. The outcome of it is, that the government assumes monopoly and rigid control of distillation and strives by proper fiscal legislation to encourage the use of beer, which the investigation proved to be a perfectly healthy drink, the general use of which, according to the printed opinion of the Swiss statistical bureau, would be regarded as a blessing to that country. In Sweden, Denmark and Norway, like investigations produced similar results. A British select commission, in 1852, thoroughly investigated the drink-question, with special reference to the use of malt-liquors, and reported that they found beer to be a per- fectly wholesome drink. • In our country we have, so far, at least one reliable collection of data on the subject; namely, that which was submitted by a Sanitary commission, appointed by President Lincoln to examine the camps of the Union army and report upon their sanitary con- dition. In examining the condition of regiments in which malt- liquors were freely used, said commission found not only that beer is a healthy beverage, but that it possesses hygienic qualities which recommend its use for the prevention of certain diseases. To be brief, wherever the effects of the use of beer upon the human body have been examined methodically by competent physicians, it was found—to use the words of Dr. Jules Rochard, of the Académie de médecine of Paris—that beer is a very healthy beverage, which helps digestion, quenches thirst and furnishes an amount of assimilable substances much greater than that con- tained in any other beverage. There is not the slightest statistical evidence to invalidate this assertion; and hence our conclusion must be, that it requires an uncommon degree either of ignorance or of mendacity to claim that beer produces the diseases enumerated in our introductory quotation; or that the rate of mortality among beer-drinkers is greater than among any other class of people. - A number of shrewd writers, who are but too well aware of the utter futility of any attempt to controvert the overwhelming medical testimony in favor of beer; but who, nevertheless, for reasons best known to themselves, wish to make their readers believe that the use of beer is dangerous to the health, resort to a artifice which, until recently, might have misled the ignorant and 7 credulous. While they admit that pure beer is harmless, they either insinuate or openly charge that American beer of the present day is composed of poisonous ingredients that cannot but injure the health of the drinker. f As a specimen of this sort of misrepresentation, I quote the following from an article in the North American Review, of September 1886, written by Petroleum V. Nasby: Lager beer was originally a seductive fluid, a mild-mannered demon, as innocent in appearance as spring water, and as beautiful. There are but few things on earth more beautiful than lager beer. The rich color in the glass, the liquid itself as clear as water, with its delicate amber tint, surmounted with the creamy foam overtopping it, is a very pretty sight, and one which appeals strongly to the lust of the eye. And then its taste . The delicate, sweetish bitter is wonderfully grateful, and, when cold as ice, the taste lingers lovingly on the palate, the warmth cheers the stomach, and it is as refreshing a drink as man could wish. And in justice it must be said that the lager beer of thirty gyears ago was comparatively harmless. Then it was made of nothing but malt and hops, it was “laid” for nearly a year until it had undergone all the fermen- tations, and it could be taken, in moderate quantities, safely. Lager beer orig- inally contained only three or four per cent. of alcohol, but it now contains ten and twelve per cent. The original beer did not make drunkards fast enough. It took too long a time to fix the habit so as to make the victim profitable. Hence they threw in glucose to make more alcohol, and all sorts of cheap drugs of the maddening kind, that the drinker might be bound hand and foot, and put into their possession in an absolutely helpless condition as soon as possible. It was not enough to make a beer-drinker of him—to get the largest profit it became necessary to make a drunkard of him. It resulted as anticipated. The editor of the North American Review may have had good reasons for permitting his contributor to accuse the Ameri- can brewers of adulteration ; but these reasons, whatever they may have been, could not convince the public that Mr. Nasby told the truth, and that the members of the State Board of Health of New York—who, in pursuance of law, had four hundred and seventy-six samples of malt liquors analyzed—told a falsehood, when they announced officially that all analyzed beers were found to be perfectly pure and wholesome, and to contain neither hop- substitutes nor any deleterious substances whatever. * * It is worthy of note that whenever the charge of adulteration was brought against brewers in such manner as to lead to governmental investigations, the result has always been like that re- cently published by the N. Y. Health Board. In 1852, a select commission of the British parlia- ment investigated such charges made against eleven of the largest breweries in England and found, to use their own words: “that no deleterious ingredients have been used by any of the eleven great breweries; * * * that the charge so far as it was intended to be pointed at the eleven great breweries, is, with the above single exception, unfounded.” The single exception was that of a brewer who, many years before the investigation, had used cream of turtar to neu- tralize the excessive acidity of a quantity of beer. 8 If in the face of such figures and facts as those presented by the said Board of Health, the editor of a periodical of the standing of the Worth American Review dares to publish articles of the Nasby calibre, it is not to be wondered at that the influence of so-called temperance advocates succeeded in &nducing one or two life-insurance companies to declare publicly that the insuring of the lives of habitual beer-drinkers involved too many extra risks to be advisable. Nor is it wonderful that, coming from such a source, this declaration is regarded as the out- come of systematic investigations made by competent physicians. It is this deceptive appearance of a statistical foundation that lent undue weight to the statement of these insurance compa- nies, and called for more than an off-hand reply. The first step which had to be taken in this matter, in order to get at the whole truth, was to ascertain whether the examining phy- sicians of any life-insurance company had collected statistics show- ing that the constant or excessive use of beer causes an abnormal rate of mortality. Diligent enquiry failed to disclose any indica- tions justifying the assumption that an attempt had ever been made in this direction. At all events, no statistics of the nature described could be found in insurance circles. And this was to be expected; for the fact is that, if statistical material of this kind existed at all, it could not, in the nature of things, have been collected by life-insurance companies through their examining physicians in this special capacity. These physicians are able, no doubt, to ascertain the actual state of health of persons brought before them for examination; but that is all they can know. They know nothing of the past condition, previous state of health, mode of life and habits of the applicant, except what the latter may tell them; and in this respect all depends upon the memory, intelligence and good-will of the person examined. When the examination is finished and the applicant insured, the physician hears no more of him, save by chance. If the insured person dies, the insurance company’s physician can ascertain what dis- ease is supposed to have caused the decease; but he can know nothing of the origin of the disease, and he is unable to say, whether there were contributive causes, latent predisposition or complicating ailments; or whether, and to what extent, the habits and mode of life of the deceased, or the medical treatment which he received, aggravated the malady and accelerated dissolution. 9 No more need be said to demonstrate the absurdity of the claim, that the experiences of life-insurance companies, and the observations made by their examining physicians in the discharge of their official duties, could throw any light on the effects of malt- liquors upon the human body. These physicians might, most assuredly, institute an investigation of this kind; but in the line of enquiry that would have to be pursued in that case, their ex- periences as examining physicians of life-insurance companies would be of no avail. They would have to follow the course marked out by the Swiss and Belgian governments and the French academicians. In doing so, they would not, of course, find any statistics in support of the absurd assertion that beer is an unwholesome drink; but they would get at the truth in an unerring manner. Conclusions arrived at in this way are firm as rocks. For instance, when the Swiss government, finding that alcoholism is unknown in localities where beer is the common drink, and that the people there are robust and long-lived, con- cludes that beer is a healthy drink—who would have the hardihood to gainsay such a conclusion ? When it is found that recruits for military service (annually examined by the thousands), who were nurtured on beer and imbibe great quantities of that liquid every day, are perfect pictures of health ; strong, vigorous, sound in every way—what conclusion can be admitted but that beer is a wholesome beverage 2 Conclusions still more convincing than those cited, by way of illustration, might be obtained by comparing the physical con- dition of beer-drinking nations with that of nations commonly using other drinks; and in this particular I might present statis- tics taken from European and American censuses, state and fede- ral, that would silence the most skeptical. But I have something far better to offer, and here it is. About five years ago the brewers of New York, Brooklyn, Newark and the neighboring towns and villages established what they call a Benevolent Bureau for the relief of their sick and dis- abled employees, and for assisting the families of deceased brew- ery workmen. Every workman belonging to the B. B. pays a fixed sum into the relief-fund; and every employer contributes a sum equal to the total amount of dues paid by his employees. The different cities, having breweries which form part of this institution, are divided into medical distriets, for which physicians 10 in good standing are appointed by the officers of the Bureau. It is the duty of these physicians to visit all sick members, and to certify over their signatures, whether, under existing rules and regulations, the patient is entitled to the stipulated pecuniary assistance. Records of all cases of sickness and of all deaths are kept by the secretary of the Bureau, to whom the physicians send monthly reports setting forth, among other things, the names of patients and the nature of the ailments, in case of sickness; and of the cause in case of death. In the course of time these physicians obtained almost a mo- mopoly of medical practice among brewery workmen, and thus became thoroughly familiar with the physical condition of the men. Their official reports together with their every-day observa- tions would in themselves suffice to form a basis—scientific and statistical—for a complete refutation of the absurd assertions in reference to malt-liquors. But, while it is not intended to waste such excellent material, it would be unwise to rest our case upon it exclusively, seeing that through the instrumentality of this conscientiously conducted institution, with its competent medical staff, we are enabled to present the outcome of just such an inves- tigation as I advised insurance companies to institute, if they would know what the effects of the constant use of malt-liquors really are. Before proceeding to a consideration of the showing of this investigation, let us look into a few statistical exhibits, compiled from the monthly reports of the physicians. The largest medical district and the one having the greatest number of brewery workmen belonging to the Benevolent Bureau, is that of Dr. Guido Katzenmayer. The number of men under his medical care varies between nine hundred and one thousand, the average number being 960. In his report on special exami- nations, appended to this, he accounts for 803 men, exclusive of the men employed in the breweries of P. Dölger, P. Buckel, J. Ahles, J. Dólger and Schmitt & Schwanenflügel, all of whom belong to his district, but were not examined, 1., because it was not intended to have more than one thousand men on the lists prepared for Our Special purpose; and, 2., because it was thought proper to include at least one other district in this investigation besides Dr. Katzenmayer's. Dr. Katzenmayer assumed medical charge of this district in 11 November 1881, and continues up to the present day to discharge the duties of visiting and examining physician. From his monthly reports, covering a period of five years, it appears that, in the aggregate, thirty-sia, deaths occurred in his district ; that is to say, that about seven deaths occurred annually in a district having between nine hundred and one thousand workmen constantly employed in breweries. As I have shown, the system of medical supervision, the manner of recording casualties, together with the mode of controlling the expendi- tures of the Benevolent Bureau, heave no room for guess-work in this connection. All statements here made are matters of record, open to everybody’s inspection. The following list shows, in the given order, the names of the deceased, the names of the brewers by whom they have been em- ployed, and the cause of death: Mame of Deceased. Brewery. Cause. John Stiehl. . . . . . . . . . . . . . G. Winter. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accident. John Pfefferle . . . . . . . . . . . H. Clausen B. Co.. . . . . . . . & 4 J. Kazmaier. . . . . . . . . . . . . G. Ehret. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cirrhosis of liver. Val. Kauff. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . J. Kress B. Co. . . . . . . . . . . Accident. J. Deckelmann . . . . . . . . . . . H. Schalk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bright's disease. Hy. Diehl . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F. & M. Schaefer B. Co... Rupture of Heart. Dan. Schankwecker . . . . . . G. Ringler & Co. . . . . . . . . . Typhoid fever. Geo. Kreissel . . . . . . . . P. Dölger. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Apoplexy. Matth. Schleicher. . . . . . . . Hy. Clausen B. Co. . . . . . . Cerebral congestion. Rob. Sommer. . . . . . . . . . . J. Ruppert. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pneumonia. A. Heintzmann. . . . . . . . . . H. Clausen B. Co. . . . . . . . . Tuberculosis of lungs. M. Hinzelberger. . . . . . . . . J. Ruppert . . . . . . . . . . . . . Apoplexy. Wrm. Moser . . . . . . . . . . . . G. Ringler & Co. . . . . . . . . . Chronic enteritis. Geo. Fuerst. . . . . . . . . . . . . . J. Ruppert . . . . . . . . . . . . . Heart disease. Louis Seffrich. . . . . . . . . . . . G. Ehret. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Typhoid fever. Geo. Sauter. . . . . . . . . . . . . “ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Insolation. Rob. Kawinski . . . . . . . . . . P. Dölger. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Heart disease. Gust. Behrmann. . . . . . . . H. Clausen B. Co. . . . . . . . . Apoplexy. E. von Lilienthal. . . . . . . . F. Oppermann, Jr. . . . . . . . Tuberculosis of lungs. M. Siebenhändel . . . . . . . . H. Clausen B. Co.. . . . . . . . 4 & & © & & M. Wernert. . . . . . . . . . . . . G. Ehret . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . {{ {{ { { John Schwartz. . . . . . . . . . . G. Ringler & Co. . . . . . . . . . Pneumonia. Matth. Biehl . . . . . . . . . . . F. Oppermann, Jr.. . . . . . . { { Mich. Hannelly. . . . . . . . . . J. Ruppert. . . . . . . . . . . . . Drowned. John Niessen. . . . . . . . . . . . H. Clausen B. Co. . . . . . . . . Alcoholism. Th. Garter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . & & “ . . . . . . . Accident. Ferdinand Daub. . . . . . . . . . P. Dölger. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pneumonia. Ch. Kiefer. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . J. Ruppert. . . . . . . . . . . . . Paralysis of heart. 12 Name of Deceased. Brewery. Cause. Matth. Gerber. . . . . . . . . . . J. Ruppert. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Carcinomata of liver and stomach. Wm. Reinisch. . . . . . . . . . . P. Dölger. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Typhoid fever. Christ. Mahler . . . . . . . . . . G. Ehret. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Carcinoma of liver. Geo. Schreiber. . . . . . . . . . . P. Dölger . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cerebral congestion. Carl Abt. . . . . . . sº e º e º & e º sº “ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Typhoid fever, Wrm. Dirkes. . . ... . . . . . . . G. Ringler & Co. . . . . . . Apoplexy. John Winheim . . . . . . . . . . P. Dölger. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tuberculosis of lungs. John Pfauth. . . . . . . . . . . . .H. Clausen B. Co. . . . . . . . . Cirrhosis of liver. Recapitulating the casualties that occurred in said district during five years, we find that there were: Deaths caused by accidents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . . . 5 { { “ apoplexy and cerebral congestion. . . . . . . . . . 6 $ 6 “ tuberculosis of lungs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 & & “ typhoid fever. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • * * * * * e 4 & 6 “ pneumonia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 & & “ diseases of the heart. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 b (, & [. & t “ liver. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 ( & K & { { ‘‘ kidneys... . . . . . s & © tº & © tº e º 'º e = 1 6& ‘’ insolation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 & 6. ‘‘ alcoholism. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 & C “ chronic enteritis. . . . . . . e e º O Q & e s e e º º * c e s e e 1 Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 The only case of alcoholism on record invited a special enquiry into the drinking-habits of the person in question, and it was found that in the last three or four years of his life the deceased had been addicted to the excessive use of ardent spirits. This case of alcoholism—a rare one among brewery workmen of any country—stood isolated not only on the list of deaths, but also, as will presently be seen, on the sick-lists from the districts investi- gated. Of diseases of the heart, liver and kidneys, the recapitu- lation shows nºne in all; that is to say, nine deaths occurred from diseases of that class, within five years, in a body of nine hundred and sixty brewery workmen. From disease of the kidneys but one man died within five years. If, in conjunction with this showing, it is stated that the average daily consumption of malt- liquors by brewery workmen is twenty-five common glasses, or about ten pints, per capita, no more need be said, it is hoped, to disprove the assertion that the constant use of beer disorders, with fatal effect, the functions of the heart, kidneys, and liver. 13 Before comparing the death-rate among brewery workmen with the pertinent mortuary statistics contained in the United States census for 1880, it is necessary to state that such a com- parison must inevitably be very favorable to any one who intends to assail my position, because the benefit of doubt and of the inevitable inaccuracies of so gigantic a work as the census will be on his side, not on mine. To begin with, he will have an advan- tage over me in that the mortality report of the census (so far as it is at present accessible”) does not, according to the admission of its compiler, include all the deaths that occurred within the year covered by it; while the mortuary report submitted here, by a physician of the Benevolent Bureau, is absolutely accu- rate. Here, then, the rate of death is given correctly; while in the census it is reported as being lower than it actually was. In addition to this, the fact should be considered that the statisticaſ information given in the census report on mortality relates to the entire population, including the rich, the wealthy, and the well. to-do, to whom, so far as the death-rate is concerned, the small pauper element of our country forms no offset; while the statistical showing herein contained relates to one single specified class of craftsmen. This is a difference which, the impartial critic must admit, is not in my favor in the case of the proposed comparison. Now let us compare figures. The number of deaths in our body of 960 brewery workmen was 36, within five years; hence the average number of deaths within one year was 7.2. This places the rate of death per thousand at 7.5. The ages of these brewery workmen range, in varying proportions, from 19 to 59 years. The only rates of death, contained in Vol. XI of the census, that can fairly be brought into a comparison with the foregoing showing, will be found in Table 6, page xxv, which shows for the United States and for thirty-one registration cities “the proportion of deaths, in the different groups of ages, per 1,000 living.” Of this table only that portion can properly be reproduced here for comparison, which covers the “groups of ages” represented in our showing, and, of course, only the figures * The able compiler of this report, Dr. Billings, refers in Part I to just such tables as would be of value here, as being contained in Part II. In answer to an enquiry, Mr. Geo. M. Lockwood, Chief Clerk of the Interior Department, telegraphed under date of December 18, 1886: “Volume XII, Part II of mortality report is now going through the press,” 14 relating to the urban population will answer the present purpose. They are given as follows: Proportion of Proportion of Ages. deaths to 1,000 living. Ages. deaths to 1,000 living. 20–25 8.5 35–40 14.0 25–30 10.3 45–50 17.6 30–35 11.3 50–55 19.2 It might be said that these figures, so far as ages are concerned, do not correspond exactly with the figures of the Brewers’ Benevo- lent Bureau, because they begin at 20 instead of 19, and end at 55 instead of 59. The disparity, which is unavoidable on account of the mode of grouping ages adopted by the census officials, operates against the objects of this pamphlet; seeing that the rate of death per 1,000 between 15 and 20 is only 5.5; while be- tween 55 and 60 it is 28.3. The aggregate of living population in the above six groups of ages was 3,333,878; the total number of deaths 41,421; hence the rate of death per 1,000, within the stated age-limits, was 12.5. It is clear, then, that instead of involving extra risks, the insur- ing of the lives of habitual beer-drinkers must be more than ordinarily profitable to insurance companies, since the chances of loss in this special case are to the general risks as 7.5 is to 12.5. In other words, the risks incurred in insuring the lives of habitual beer-drinkers are less, by forty per cent., than the ordinary risks of such transactions. The death-rate in the regular army of the United States dur- ing the fiscal year 1885—a year of peace, in which, as the Surgeon General’s report states, no casualties from actual warfare were returned—was 10.9 per 1,000 of mean strength. Medical exami- nations at recruiting stations for the regular military service are conducted with a special view to securing men of good physique, of great strength and perfect health. Besides, as compared with the life of a brewery workman, with its hard and steady work and manifold cares, the soldier's life in peace is an easy One. Ex- cepting such accidents as are inseparable from the constant hand- ling of fire-arms, the soldier, in times of peace, is exposed to fewer chances of disease and death than the average workman. Well- fed, comfortably quartered and clothed, he lives without cares or troubles, in a constant routine of healthful exercise. Yet, even as compared with the soldier in peace-time, we find that the 15 brewery workmen have a great advantage in point of low rate of mortality. It is true, the deaths from accidents were uncommonly numerous in the army, their proportion to the deaths from all other causes being given at 31 per cent. ; that is more than again as large as the ratio of deaths from accidents among brewery workmen. But even so, the difference in favor of the latter is remarkable. The number of deaths in the army was 263 from all causes; the number of deaths from accidents was 83, in a body of soldiers of an average strength of 24,035. De- ducting that number of deaths from accidents, which is in excess of the proportion returned for brewery workmen, we still have 46 more deaths, in a total of 263, than would have occurred at the rate of death among brewery workmen.—So much for the claim that the insuring of the lives of habitual beer-drinkers involves extra risks. Compiling the monthly reports and sick-lists rendered by Dr. Ratzenmayer during five years, and classifying the causes of sickness in the usual general way, the relative proportion of the various diseases treated by said physician, during the period cov- ered by his reports, is found to be as follows: 42.9 per cent. of surgical cases caused by accidents of all kinds, fractures, dis- locations, contusions, wounds, etc. 27.5 ‘‘ ‘‘ ‘‘ disturbances of the alimentary canal, acute catarrh of the stomach, intestinal catarrh, diarrhoea, dysentery, etc. 12.5 ‘‘ ‘‘ ‘‘ rheumatic diseases. 9.4 “ “ “ diseases of the air passages: tonsilletis, diphtheria, bronchitis, pneumonia, pleuresy, etc. 3.6 ‘‘ ‘‘ ‘‘ fevers; typhoid, intermittent, etc. 2.1 “ “ “acute congestions of liver and kidneys. 1.0 ‘‘ ‘‘ ‘‘ diseases of the skin. 0.6 “ ‘‘ ‘‘ cerebral and spinal diseases. 0.4 ‘‘ ‘‘ ‘‘ diseases of the heart. Considered in conjunction with what has already been said and proved as to diseases of a certain order, the foregoing figures are too eloquent per se, to need further elucidation. If no other data could be obtained, the showing thus far pre- sented might be made to answer all purposes of a controversy with opponents who have neither statistical nor historical proofs to offer for their assertions. But, as has already been said, the existence of a sort of brewers’ insurance company, with a complete medical staff, suggested the advisability of instituting a special 16 investigation with exclusive reference to the effects of malt-liquors upon the human body. It will readily be admitted by everybody that among the en- tire population of the United States not another body of men of equal number could be found, who, from their mode of life and drinking-habits, would be better suited for such a purpose than brewery workmen. For, as a class, they drink beer and ale more constantly and more copiously than the average beer-drinker. For the information of those who are not acquainted with the usages prevailing in breweries, it must be stated that brewery workmen have at all times access to what in the jargon of the trade is styled the “Sternenwirth,” i. e., a room, set apart within every brew-house, where beer is constantly “on tap,” to be used by every one at pleasure and without cost. Every one drinks as much beer as he thirsts for, without asking or being asked any questions as to his right to do so. These brewery workmen are a body of men who, on the days when they turn out in force for their annual out-door festivals, attract much attention by their stalwart physique, their healthy appearance and the noticeable rarity of that obesity, which is popularly but erroneously supposed to be a result of the use of malt-liquors; but which, in the case of a certain class of easy- going and well-to-do Germans, is attributable to a number of things that, together, make up a peculiar mode of life. As to the condition of these men in point of wages, work and habits (im- portant factors in every way) a few words must be said, especially because the United States Census for 1880 (Vol. XX, Statistics of wages) contains but very little information on that subject, and that little relating only to six breweries in small western towns. The lowest weekly wages (excepting those of apprentices at $10) paid in the breweries of New York—the city to which all our figures refer—are those of workmen in wash-houses and engine-rooms. These men receive $15 per week; brewers at work in cellars, fermenting rooms and at kettles receive $18 per week. All men work twelve hours, that is to say they are en- gaged from 6 A. M. to 6 P.M., but within that time they have two hours of leisure for meals. The nature of their work requires physical strength, but does not exhaust the energies by reason of undue or continued tension. The proportion of married men is very large. Their food is simple, but, as a rule, substantial and 17 very judiciously chosen. In point or education and intellect they are much above the average, illiteracy being very rare among them. Their social habits are those of the average German- American workmen—simple, pure, and as far removed from licentiousness as from asceticism. With a view to ascertaining, in the most reliable manner pos- sible, the effects of the use of malt-liquors, the physicians of the Benevolent Bureau examined one thousand of these men, engaged in breweries, as to: 1, general state of health; 2, condition of liver; 3, condition of kidneys; 4, condition of heart. In addition to this, the physicians were directed to weigh and measure every man ; to test his strength by dynamometer; state his age, length of time employed in breweries, and average daily quantity of beer consumed. By referring to the appended tables it will be found that the initials of the name of every man” and the name of his employer are given, so that any physician inclined to verify the results of our examinations will have no trouble in doing so. These examinations showed, that there are, in all, twenty-five men out of one thousand, whose general state of health, or con- dition of liver, or condition of heart, or condition of kidneys, is not perfect; and that the remaining nine hundred and seventy- five men enjoy exceptionally good health, and are of splendid physique. The average daily consumption of malt-liquors is 25.73 glasses, about 10 pints, per capita. Of the twenty-five men recorded as unsound, a very large proportion would not have been so returned in our tables, if the examinations had been confined to the condition of the heart, the liver and the kidneys. But it was thought neces- sary to point out all those whose health is impaired from any cause whatever ; no matter, whether the latter can be traced to the use of beer or not. Hence, when the “general state of health’’ was found, in any case, to be precarious, the physician had to make a corresponding entry in his list and explain the same under the head of special remarks by stating the cause or nature of the infirmity. This accounts for the fact that such diseases as icterus, bronchitis, rheumatism, tuberculosis of lungs, etc., are specified as causes impairing the “general state of health.” * The full names of the men examined are inscribed on a list in the hands of the examiners, and can be referred to as a guide to the appended tables. 18 Dividing the twenty-five unsound men according to the nature of diseases which impaired their health, we obtain the following: Diseases of the liver. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 & & “ heart. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 § { “ kidneys. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Emphysema. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. Rheumatism... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Icterus. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Bronchitis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Tuberculosis of lungs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 The causes of the three first-named diseases are known to be so manifold, that it would be more than ventureSome to assume, in the off-hand way of our opponents, that beer is at the bottom of them all. Yet no attempt will be made to weaken the show- ing as it stands, save in the case of Ch. W. (230) whose ailment, abscess of liver, was produced, to the positive knowledge of the physicians who performed an operation on the patient, by external injuries. - Rheumatism and diseases of the air passages are generally regarded by brewers as their trade diseases, produced either by constant exposure to the inclemency of the weather, as in the case of drivers; or by exposure to the sudden and extreme changes of temperature incident to the work in cellars, ice- houses and cooling-rooms; or by exposure to the constant moisture in wash-houses. An adequate basis for comparing the results of our examina- tion with the prevalence of the diseases named in other portions of the population, is not at hand. It is assumed, however, that what has before been shown, will suffice for all practical pur- poses. As a rule, the men examined displayed unusual muscular strength. The average weight lifted was 480 pounds; the lowest weight indicated on the dynamometer, used by Dr. Katzenmayer, being 390 pounds. Grouping the men according to the length of time they are employed in breweries, we find the largest num- ber in the group from five to ten years, there being about 300 in it. From ten to fifteen years the number is 187, and from fifteen to twenty 122. Those who are engaged in brewing from one month to two years are a little more numerous than those who were thus engaged for over twenty, and less than twenty-five years. The 19 number of men at work over twenty-five years is 46. In the first and last groups no unsound men were found; in the other groups the numbers are as follows: Number Average daily quantity of Men. of beer consumed per capita. From 2 to 5 years, 2 23 62 & 4 5 “ 10 “ - 4 - 24.63 “ 10 “ 15 “ 6 26.60 • 15 “ 20 “ 5 26.09 • 20 “ 25 “ 8 26.22 Comparing height of body and breadth of chest with the weight (see columns 5, 6, 7 and 8 of our tables) it will be found that, as a rule, brewery workmen, as has already been said, are not remarkable for obesity; on the contrary, the rare occurrence of weight that does not correspond with the size of the men is striking. It is reasonable to assume that the mode of life of brewery workmen accounts for this favorable showing, and that the same quantities of beer, if consumed by men of sedentary habits—shoemakers, for example—would produce different re- sults. The error made by nearly all writers on this subject arises from a misconception as to the difference between a constant and an excessive use of malt-liquors. The nature of the work in which men are engaged and the general manner of living de- termine the quantities of malt-liquors men can consume without injury to their healths. It is a fact well known to every one who has devoted any attention to this matter, that the daily con- sumption of beer among Germans, the majority of whom are habitual, but not excessive beer-drinkers, varies from five to twenty glasses, according to the nature of the occupation of the drinker. - In the case of the brewery workmen, surroundings and usage favor the consumption of unusually large quantities of beer; yet, as we have seen, both as to immunity from disease, and low rate of mortality, this very class of workmen enjoy marked ad- vantages. Here, then, the use of malt-liquors, despite the large quantities habitually consumed, cannot be deemed excessive; but might, and probably would, be regarded as such, if indulged in to the same extent by men of sedentary habits. And in the latter case the health of the drinkers might be impaired in consequence of such copious use, just as a quantity of meat, barely sufficient 20 to appease the hunger of an agricultural laborer, would disorder the stomach of a man of different habits, engaged in a calling that requires no physical exertion. Nothing, it appears, is more difficult than to establish a general limit to quantity, beyond which the use of malt-liquors may properly be styled excessive. But whatever the quantity consumed by a man may be, we can not regard it as excessive so long as the man's health is not affected by it. When, in spite of the constant consumption of large quantities of malt-liquors, we find that the health of the drinkers is unusually good, the rate of mortality among them un- commonly low, and longevity above the average,” we must con- clude not only that malt-liquors are wholesome beverages, but that their use in the quantities stated in our table is not injuri- ous to the health of hard-working persons. This is what our examinations demonstrate in the most convincing manner. Before concluding, it may not be amiss to direct attention to the condition of those men who worked in breweries over twenty years. In not a few instances, the vigor displayed by these men, and the entire absence of bodily ailments, past or present, sur- prised even the examining physicians. Such a case as that given in our list opposite No. 837 (G. W.) ought to convince the most sceptical, that beer is a wholesome drink. Here is a man of 56 years of age, uninterruptedly at work in breweries during 32 years, who drank beer throughout this time at the rate of 50 glasses per day; yet has never been sick, and to-day is perfectly healthy, vigorous and active. He is not an exception; our tables exhibit many cases like this.} What the statistics herein presented demonstrate with abso- lute accuracy, may be summed up, then, in these words: I. Brewers drink more beer, and drink it more constantly, than any other class of people. II. The rate of death among brewers is lower, by 40 per cent., * According to recent European statistics the average longevity of brewers, bakers and butchers is next to the highest among craftsmen (54 years); gardeners and fishermen leading with an average longevity of 58 years. t Any physician who desires to test the correctness of the tables herein presented, by re- examining any number of men, to be selected by him at random from the entire list, will be as- sisted by the physicians who made the original examinations, and by the writer of this, in such manner as to facilitate and expedite his undertaking as much as possible. 21 than the average death-rate among the urban population of the groups of ages corresponding with those to which brewery work- men belong. III. The health of brewers is unusually good; diseases of the kidneys and liver occur rarely among them. The conclusion to be drawn from II and III is: IV. That on an average brewers live longer and preserve their physical energies better than the average workman of the United States. AFFENDIX. FEPO FT MEDICAL EXAMINATIONS ONE THOUSAND MEN EMPLOYED IN BREWERIES, 25 Persons employed in Messrs. H. CLAUSEN & SoN Brewing Co., examined by Dr. GUIDO KATZENMAYER. # g e º '3 × 5 º: Śā § Gl) e 3.33; 3 .# 2 : j := #3 ## | #2 ‘5 $5 ‘s *: ..., rc. e O ~! !-- --> -, *, *: Ca ### :* | ##| | | ##| ###|##3 # 5 g | 5 # | 3: SPECIAL No. ###| |Age. 33.3 | #7 | #| |#T | ###| ###| gé # # ÉÉ #&# ##| #| | # |##| ##|###| # | #5 ##| ##| REMAnks. H' 5: 2: ..º. P- Q) F 3rd : :"; d) O 3H § F. 5: #5 ſº É 3 $ 5 § | dº O O O & O # * | 3 #3 1 G. M. 44 25 | 6– 2 215 41 || 4 20 | Good. | Good. | Good. | Good, 2 || T. K. 48 4% 5– 6; 141 36 2 15 & & & 4 & 4 & & 3 || A. A. | 36 | 16 || 5– 7 | 162 || 36 || 3 || 20 | < * | ** | ** | ** 4 || A. S. 33 7 || 5– 2 149 || 36 3 20 & & & & & & & & 5 Ch. H. 23 24 5–10 210 || 38 || 3 | 40 || “ “ “ “ 6 || C. H. 46 || 25 | 5–7 225 || 42 24 10 & & & & & & & & 7 A. H. 44 || 10 || 5– 9 151 || 36 || 2 | 20 | < * | ** | ** | ** 8 || S. W. 33 | 16 || 5– 7#| 163 || 36 || 3 30 & & & & & ſº & & 9 L. H. 44 9 5– 5} 165 36 2} 25 & ſº & & & & & © . 10 G. Sch. 46 || 5 || 5– 8 || 192 || 38 || 3 || 40 “ ‘‘ “ “ 11 ||W. S.Ch. 35 5} | 5–9%. 153 || 36 1} 35 |Precarious “ & 4 ‘‘ On account of 12 | Ch. F. 50 || 36 5–10%| 186 || 36 || 3 50 G00d. & & & & & & ºphy 13 G. St. 30 34 5–6 | 165 36 2} 25 { { & & & & & & -> 14 J. K. 26 5 || 5– 7#| 160 | 36 3 50 & & & & & & & & 15 F. K. 27 | 3 || 5– 155 | 35 | 24 || 25 || “ “ “ “ 16 J. H. 34 9 5– 9; 190 38 3 12 & & & & & & & & 17 | P. F. 26 9 5– 9; 168 36 3 25 & 4 & & & 4 & & 18 F. Sch. 43 9 6– 1 226 40 4 50 & & & & ( & & & 19 P. S. 31 1 5– 7#| 152 34 2} 20 & 4 & 4 { { & & 20 E. H. 27 3 5– 8+ 173 39 4 25 & ( & 6 & & & & 21 J. F. 19 2 5– 9 166 35 3 20 { % & & & & & & 22 | F. H. 27 || 2 || 5– 8%| 167 || 36 || 4 || 20 | “ “ “ “ 23 Th. H. 28 34 5–10 | 196 || 37 || 3 || 10 “ “ “ “ 24 J. M. 31 5 5– 7# 145 || 35 2 15 { { & 6 & & & G 25 || A. H. 33 4 5– 7#| 166 35. 8 25 4 & & & & 4 ( & 26 W. G. 53 7 5— 1 202 40 3 20 & 4 * & & W & & 27 Ch. IB. 61 22 5— 1 193 38 1#. 20 & & & 4 ( & & & 28 G. E. 56 24 5– 7 | 196 || 38 2 25 |Pretarious! “ & 8 “ | Had symptoms 29 || R. P. 35 5 5–84; 178 36 24 10 G00d. & & ( & & & #.; Of 30 [Ph. Sch. 38 || 2 || 5– 7 || 179 || 37 || 3 50 || “. & & & & * | * * * 31 | H. D. 26 || 12 5–14, 178 36 24 25 “ “ “ “ 32 | H. B. 38 || 11 5– 5 144 35 | 3 5 ( & & & & & & & 33 H. A. 39 25 5–10 200 40 24 20 “ “ “ “ 34 G. G. 43 8 5–11 174 || 37 2 25 & & & & & & & & 35 | S. M. 34 19 5–64. 204 || 40 || 24 30 “ “ “ | “ 36 | P. B. 36 || 6 || 5– 8 || 165 38 24 || 5 || “ “ “ “ 37 J. H. 33 14 5– 7 167 36 2} 20 & & & & { { & & 38 A. H. 29 || 12 5– 8 229 40 3 25 6 º' & & & & • & 39 G. F. 29 7 5– 7 173 35 3 20 & & & 4 & & & & 40 J. S. 38 • 18 5– 4 200 40 4 20 c ºf & 4 & & & & 41 Ph. F. 34 16 || 5– 8 187 || 35 | 34 20 “ “ |Precarious “ |Had Albuminu- 42 Ch. D. 21 5 5–10 || 145 || 34 2} 12 ( & & & G00d. & & º OD acCOUlnt 43 |Ph. W. 30 || 2 || 5–113, 196 || 38 || 2: 30 || “ | * | * | * | ...ºft. 44 G. V. 39 6 5–6%; 174 39 2} 20 4 & { { & & { { Reysfyr ago. 45 A. S. 34 16 5– 7% 164 35 2} 15 § & & ( (. g & { { 46 F. D. 45 28 5– 7 176 38 3 20 ( & & & { { & & 47 F. R. 36 19 5– 5; 175 38 2} 25 6 & 4 & l, & & 4 48 V. N. 28 6 5–10 153 34 2 30 & 4 • & & & & © 49 |Ch. Sch. 32 12 5– 7 | 202 | 40 2 30 & & & & { { ( & 50 | P. R. 36 10 4– 3 | 135 | 33 2 20 { % & & ( & ( & 26 Persons employed in Messrs. H. CLAUSEN & SoN Brewing Co., examined by Dr. GUIDO KATZENMAYER.—(Continued.) No. i i | i C i f ººO J : G. M. M. M ºh i S C h. N S C h Age. à º: É td ad 's 2 aä H Śā # Q --, -º Gi) .# | # | ##| jä ºã #3 *5 § 2 $5 º # | T | # # É. # §§ # | ##| SPECIAL .e.; ‘35 .E. QD : E : C. § §§ 5.2. : it: āś # #| | # # ##|s; # #5 # ##| | REMARKs. # § É ##| 5 §g ### $* | 3 3 3 H 5 #5 |*|# 3 * ſº -* 7 || 5– 6 | 187 39 4 25 G00d. | Good. G00d. | Good. 11 || 5– 5 | 153 || 36 2+ 5 & & & & 6 & 4 : 10 || 5–64 179 37 2% 10 & & & & 4 & & & 16 5– 7#| 166 37 2} 20 & & & & 4 & & & 10 || 5– 8 || 157 36 24 20 & & & 4 & 4 4 & 6 5– 8 || 168 35 | 3} 30 ( & & & & & & & # 5–9 172 35 | 2 20 & & 4 & 4 & & & 15 5– 7+| 147 35 2% 20 & & 6 & 4 & & & 4 5– 8+ 151 || 36 3} 30 & C & e & & & 4 4} | 5– 5 || 150 | 35 | 2 15 4 & 4 & ( ſ. & & 10 || 5–44 135 | 34 2 6 & & & & & & & & 13 5– 8; 242 || 46 2 5 & & & & ( & § { 2 5– 5 || 145 || 34 2} 20 & & & & & & & & 4 || 5–4 || 130 32 || 2 8 & & 4 & & & 4 & 5 5–9%. 160 | 35 | 3 35 & $ 4 & & & & & 4} | 6– 6 || 177 || 38 24 20 & & & & & & © ( 8 || 6– 1 208 || 37 2 15 & & & & & & & © 10 || 6– 1 | 160 || 34 || 3 10 4 & 4 & 4 & & & 5 5– 5 || 174 || 34 || 3 6 & & & & ( & & & 16 || 5– 9 || 219 || 41 || 3 10 ( & & & { { & 4 5– 5+| 165 35 | 2% 5 & & & & ( & & & 4 5–10 | 202 || 34 2% 25 ( & & & & 4 4 & 6 || 5– 8 || 174 37 || 3 25 & & & & ( & 4 & 164 5– 8 || 147 || 33 2 25 ( & & 4 ( & ( & 14 5–9 223 41 || 23 30 & & ( & t & & & 15 5– 5 | 163 37 1+ 10 ( & & & ( & & 4 4; 5– 5 || 148 || 35 | 2% 10 & & & 4 & 4 & & # 5– 8 || 165 36 || 3 40 & & & 4 & 4 & & 2 | 6– 1 | 200 | 40 3 5 & 4 & & & 4 & & 4 || 6–2 | 185 | 40 || 2 40 4 & ( & & 4 • { 10 || 5– 8 || 203 || 39 24 15 ( & { { & & & & 8 5– 5}| 161 || 36 2% 20 ( & & & 4 & & & 6 || 5–4 || 135 | 35 | 2 20 { & & & ( & t & 9 5– 9 || 177 38 2} 50 & & & 4 & & 4 & 5 5– 8 167 || 35 | 2+ 30 & & ( & ( & 4 & 3 5– 8 || 162 35 | 2% 12 ( & & & ſ & & 4 16 5– 7 || 144 || 35 | 2% 20 & & & 8 4 & 4 & 3 5–11 || 203 || 38 2+ 20 { { & 4 & 4 & & 12 || 5– 6 || 140 || 36 2 10 4 & ( & & & & & 24 5– 8 || 165 35 | 3 15 ( & & 4 & & & & 20 || 5– 9 || 163 || 36 2 30 & & & & & & & & 30 5– 7 || 210 || 41 || 2% 15 & 4 & 4 & 4 & & 7 5–10 | 183 35 | 2 15 ( & & & ( & & & 6 5– 84, 168 || 38 3 50 4 & & & ( & & & 10 || 6– 1 288 45 2} 20 & & ( & 4 & & & 4; 5– 5 197 38 3 10 & & & º & & 4 & 9 || 5– 9 || 172 35 2+ 5 4 & & 4 & 4 & G | 5–10 | 182 36 2+ 5 & & & 4 & 4 & & 2 5–8, 165 35 2 12 { { { % { % { % 20 213 || 41 2+ 15 { { { % { { { % 5– 8 27 Persons employed in Messrs. H. CLAUSEN & SoN Brewing Co., examined by Dr. GUIDo KATZENMAYER.—(Continued.) ă º É º |'s 2 == ă Śā # $2 &-4 ‘: re; #53 || 3 | # g; Fä3 || 2:# # 3 || 3 || 3 || || 8 ... ; ; #|| ##|i |##|##|###| # #g | ##| # special No. ### Age. §§ #" .d #T äää ă ă ă É # ## # #&# ###| # # |##|##|###| # #5 | # ##| REMAnks. H' ſº šā; & | 3 |##|###|###| 3° | 8 || 8 || 8 sº- ſº © & " | # 33 101 || Ch. P. 38 1} 5– 7 | 181 38 3 30 | 600d. G00d, G00d. G00d. 102 | F. E. 38 # 5–8 || 179 || 38 2} 15 { % { { { % * { 103 G. G. 29 5 5– 8% 145 35 3 30 { { { { § { { { 104 || C. B. 54 || 26 || 5–10 | 189 || 38 3 50 { { ( & § { ( & 105 Th. Sch. 33 3 5– 7 || 193 || 38 || 3 40 § { ( & & C { { 106 || B. Th. 34 3 5– 5 || 142 | 35 2} 40 & 4 { { & C { { 107 || H. S. 42 2 5– 64| 170 || 36 2 40 { { { { { { § { 108 || L. K. 34 || 12 || 5– 6%| 162 35 | 2% 25 { { § { { { § { 109 || M. F. 39 16 || 5– 6%| 177 || 37 || 2+ 10 { { & 4 § { § { 110 G. F. 41 8 || 5– 7 || 131 || 34 2 20 { { { { { { § { 111 || J. W. 26 5 5– 6 165 37 || 3 16 { { § { { % { % 112 || J. K. 32 || 15 5–10%| 193 38 3 20 (, i. { { { { { % 113 | Ch. E. 29 6 5–10 | 159 || 35 | 2+ 20 ( & { { ( (. § { 114 J. Pf. 46 20 5– 5 #| 148 || 33 14 20 Precarious] ** { { & 4 115 M. A. | 37 9 || 5– 9 || 183 || 38 || 3 20 G00d, { { { { ( & 116 A. McG. 38 10 || 5– 7+ 163 33 2 25 { % { { § { { { 117 | B. B. 36 4 5–7, 172 38 2} 50 § { { { ( & { { 118 K. B. 28 5 || 5–10 | 159 || 36 2} 20 § { (, i. { { § { Persons employed in Mr. G. EHRET's Brewery, examined by Dr. GUIDo KATZENMAYER. 119 || J. B. 28 11 5–11 || 212 || 42 3# 25 G00d. G00d. 600d. G00d. 120 | A. V. 40 | 12 5– 8 || 170 36 2 25 { { { { { { { { 121 G. Z. || 36 | 16 || 5–7%. 163 35 | 24 30 { { { { { { ( (. 122 |G. E. H. 29 1} | 5–9 | 185 37 2} 20 { { § { { { ( & 123 || B. S. 28 || 12 || 5–10 | 206 || 37 || 3 30 { { { { { { ** Had Congestion 124 X. K. 43 26 5– 7#| 234 || 47 4 40 ( & { { { { { % º:º: 125 F. E. 21 1+ 5–10 150 || 35 3 15 { { { { { { ( & Åiº. 126 L. R. 26 2} | 5– 54; 176 || 34 || 2+ 25 { { { % { { { { 127 | H. H. 27 2} | 5–10%| 218 40 || 4 25 { { { { { { { { 128 K. R. 33 6 5– 7 || 171 || 36 3 40 § { { { { { { % 129 || K. S. 25 10 || 5– 7 || 175 | 38 3 20 { { { % { { { { 130 J. H. 48 34 5–8, 188 || 40 2} 40 ( & { % § { § { 131 || J. B. 35 5 5–7%. 162 || 36|| 3 20 * { { { { % { % 132 | F. B. 21 2} | 5– 8%| 164 || 35 | 3 20 ( (. { % { { { { 133 J. F. 30 7 || 5– 8 || 176 36 2 25 { % { { & 6 § { 134 || L. G. 28 5 5–64 150 || 35 2+ 10 { { ( & { { § { 135 | F. B. 33 17 | 5– 7 | 185 | 40 || 3 35 { % { % { { { { 136 || W. L. 38 11 5– 8 || 175 35 | 24 30 ( & { { { { { { 137 I. M. 31 8 || 5– 7 || 154 || 35 | 2+ 25 { { { { { % ( & 138 G. B. 25 4 || 5– 9 || 162 || 36 3 40 { { { % { % { { 139 || H. R. 20 6 || 5– 7+| 155 35 | 2+ 30 { { * { { { { % 140 | E. B. 30 | 16 || 5–4 || 138 || 34 2 16 { { { { { { { { 141 || J. K. 20 # 5–10 | 151 || 35 2} 20 { { { { ( & § { 142 | W. B. 30 6 || 5–4 || 140 || 33 24 40 { { { % { { { { 28 Persons employed in Mr. G. EHRET's Brewery, examined by Dr. GUIDo KATZENMAYER.—(Continued.) # g # e ad * ... =# º ää ; Qi.) &-4 ‘5 2.É E.S. ## 3 # †: £áà #5 C e O ad O so. # |*|##| #| || |#|##|É| # #| #| ##| * ### ###| # | # #| #|º; # #5 | # | # REMARKs, ET; ###| "# | | |##|##| ###| #3 || 3 || 3* | 3 sº Prº 55 |"5 § ; # & H | < *ś -*. 143 |Ch. Sch. 37 3 5– 7 | 165 || 36 3 30 G00d G00d G00d G00d 144 | F. B. 46 3 5–6; 165 37 2; 15 { % { { { % { % 145 || R. K. 27 5} | 5– 7 || 170 35 | 2+ 30 { { ( & { % { % 146 V. Sp. 26 7 5– 6 || 158 || 35 | 2 25 { { { { – ‘ { { 147|| J. K. 36 || 10 || 5– 8 || 173 || 35 | 2+ 25 { % & C { { { { 148 W. V. 43 8 || 5– 7 | 166 || 34 2 20 { { { { { { { { 149 || L. J. 39 7 || 5–9, 200 39 4 25 { { { { { { ( & 150 G. W. 33 5} | 5–11 | 167 || 35 | 3 25 $ $ { { { { { { 151 | B. Eh. 26 || 10 || 5–5 || 156 || 35 | 2; 35 § { § { { { { % 152 | P. B. 26 5 5–8; 159 || 35 | 2 30 { { { { { { { { 153 H. L. 31 || 10 || 5–7%. 155 || 36 3 25 ( & { { { { { % 154 F. S. 32 9 5– 5 165 37 || 3 30 { % { { § { { { 155 K. K. 21 7 5–7 155 || 35 | 23 30 { % { { { { { { 156 || Ald. B. 23 10 || 5–10 || 170 38 2 25 { % { { { { { % 157 | F. H. 30 6 5– 3 | 157 || 35 | 3 || 40 { { { { ( { ( c. 158 || R. Eh. 27 9 || 4– 5 || 140 || 35 | 2 30 { { { { { % { { 159 |Al. Sch.| 24 5 5–84| 179 || 35 | 3} 50 § { { { { % { % 160 Wm. St. 28 | 12 5– 7 || 155 37 2} 25 { { { { { % { { 161 B. G. 48 13 6– 205 || 39 4 20 { { { { { { { { 162 || K. F. 26 | 12 5–8; 187 || 38 || 3 50 * { { { { { { 163 J. Br. 43 26 5– 5 || 153 || 36 || 3 30 { % * { { { { % 164 J. M. 19 # 5–10 | 165 || 36 || 3 30 { { { { { { { { 165 || Ph. M. 37 || 23 5– 7 || 178 || 37 3 30 { { { { { % { { 166 || A. R. 31 15 5– 6 || 170 || 37 || 3 25 { { { { { { { { 167 J. K. 32 16 || 5– 6 165 42 3 50 { % { % { % ( : 168 || J. G. 37 || 14 5– 6 143 || 36 2 30 ( & { % { { { % 169 || J. Gr. 24 8 || 5– 8 || 163 || 36, 3 20 { { { { { { { { 170 WIm. G. 43 4; 5–9 215 42 || 4 30 ( { { { { { { { 171 G. R. 27 | 13 5– 7 186 || 43 4 50 { { { { { % { % 172 Jo. Alb. 28 10 5– 6% 170 | 37 3 30 { { { { { { { { 173 || Alb. L. 25 § 5–8 173 ||37 || 3 10 { { { { { % { % 174 A. R. 36 | 15 6–3 || 216 || 39 2; 50 { { { { { % { { 175 || C. M. 36 8 5–10 | 208 || 37 3 35 { % { { { % { { 176 || Ch. B. 29 3 5– 4 127 | 33 2 40 * { { % { { { % 177 Jos. S. 30 || 13 || 5–6; 169 || 37 || 3 30 { % { { ( & { { 178 Alb. W. 20 + 5– 7 148 || 34 2 10 { % { % { % { { 179 Ch. E. 27 10 || 5– 6 150 35 | 2 15 { % { { { { { { 180 Ch. M. 41 5 5– 6# 192 || 37 3 20 { { { { { { { { 181 L. H. 25 | 10 5–7 | 164 || 35 | 2; 20 { { { % { % $ (, 182 || Al. K. 32 | 16 5–6; 165 34 2} 25 { % { { { { { % 183 || L. F. 39 6 5–7, 150 34 2 30 { % { % ( (. { % 184 H. D. 20 6 || 5–6%; 143 || 33 2#. 20 { { { % { % { % 185 | M. B. 37 7 | 5–6 216 40 || 3% 30 { { { { § { { % 186 || M. G. 39 7 5–9, 205 | 40 3 35 { { { { § { § { 187 | G. Kl. 45 19 5– 9 || 155 || 35 3 30 { { { % ! { { % 188 P. Sp 44 24. 5–10 || 232 || 41 3 40 { { { { ( (. { % 189 || R. Er. 24 || 10 || 5– 5 156 35 | 2% 35 ( { { { { { ( (. 190 Wm.St. 42 25 5–5 || 148 || 35 | 3 20 { { { { { { { { 191 || M. B 29 8 5– 2 128 34 2 30 { % { { ! [. { % 192 | L. L. 42 | 14 5– 5 || 170 | 40 2; 25 { % { % ( \| { { 29 Persons employed in Mr. G. EHRET's Brewery, examined by Dr. GUIDo RATZENMAYER.—(Continued.) td tº- 5 . . . … 3 GD . C C 2 r—s º 3 ad ad Q) 3 g; 8 Q = } 3 &–4 &– &–4 's 23 É .# | # |##| ##|##| #5 | f | | | g | 25.5 ##| | #3 | T | ##| ###| || 33' | # £3 5; # SPECIAL No. ### |Age: 3; #7 | # |#T | ###|###| # ÉÉ # | #3 # * : É #! # # #gä §§ | #~ EH #3 EF REMARKS. H ºl ###| Tà || 3 |##|###|###| #8 || 5 || 3" | 8 º • * § 3 || $ = 3 - H É O H 3 ** 193 P. G. 41 20 5–11 || 263 || 46 || 3 20 G00d. | 600d. G00d. | Good. 194 G. E. 42 18 5–7, 226 42 || 3 20 ( & { % { % $ (, 195 || G. B. 35 9 || 6–2 || 214 | 40 || 3 30 { % { { { % { { 196 || J. St. 24 || 9 || 5–64 155 33 || 3 30 { % “ { { { { 197 G. S. 17 1 || 5– 3 || 155 35 2 2 (, , $ (, { % { % 198 || H. M. 38 15 5–9, 203 || 38 || 1% 25 { { { % { { { { 199 || A. W. 20 || 5 || 5– 8 || 175 35 | 3 25 ( (. { { { % { { 200 Th. Kl. 33 # 6– 228 40 2} 30 & 4 { % { { { { 201 || A. Sch.| 26 7 5– 9%| 168 || 35 3 30 { { { { { % { % 202 || K. B. 27 | 3 || 5– 84, 179 || 35 || 4 25 { { { { { { ( . 203 || J. K. 26 7 || 5–10 | 166 || 36 || 3 30 ( (. { % { { { % 204 || K. Kl. 40 20 5– 8 180 || 37 || 3 25 ( (. { { { { { { 205 || L. Sch. 30 || 13 || 5– 7 || 170 || 36 || 2 30 § { { { (, . { { 206 || A. R. 46 9} 5– 8 || 173 || 36 2} 15 § { * { { % { { 207 || M. D. 30 | 15 5– 6 || 155 || 36 3 30 || “. { { { { { % 208 || G. Ga. 26 || 13 5– 7 || 203 || 39 4 40 “ { { { % { % 209 || Ph. S. 23 9 || 5– 6 || 184 || 37 || 3 40 { % { % { % § { 210 A. F. 23 || 8 || 5– 7 | 196 || 38 24 60 | “ { { { { { { 211 | Eb. St. 25 | 14 || 5– 6 | 169 || 38 || 2 35 { % { { { { ( (. 212 || Ad. L. 30 1} | 5–4 || 175 35 2 15 { { { { { % { { 213 W. B. 30 10 5– 7 || 159 || 35 2 35 { % { % { { { { 214 E. McD. 48 6 6– 228 42 3 70 * { { % { % { { 215 G. H. 24 3} | 5– 7 | 201 | 40 3 40 { { { { { % § { 216 F. Sch. 33 22 5– 7 | 200 | 40 33 25 { % { { { { { { 217 J. H. 36 4} 5– 4 214 43 3 20 { % { 0. { { (, 218 J. M. 31 || 10 || 5– 7 || 212 || 39 || 3 20 || “. ( & { { { % 219 || C. P. 28 4 || 5–4 || 179 | 40 | 24 20 § { { % \ { { { 220 Ch. E. 31 8 5– 9} 173 35 3 40 { { { { * { { % 221 | FK. W. 29 || 10 || 5–11}| 162 34 || 3 25 § { { { { {. { { 222 | F. Sch.| 27 | 8 || 5–10 | 186 || 36 || 3 25 “. * { \ { C. § 223 | Ch. B. 30 16 5– 8 || 197 || 38 3 70 { % § { { % § { 224 A. M. 27 12 5– 9 176 || 35 3 25 ( (. { % ( (. * { 225 G. W. 30 6 5- 9%| 166 || 36 3 50 ( (. { { { { { { 226 G. S. 54 5+ 5–84| 165 35 | 2 15 { % { { { { § { 227 | F. M. 42 | 16 || 5–10 | 168 || 36 || 3 20 { % l, i. { % { { 228 Ch. R. 28 # 5–10 || 176 35 3 15 { { { { { % * { 229 č, W. 47 22 5– 9: 278 || 45 || 3 30 § { { { { % { { Had Abscess of 230 . W. 31 | 18 5– 1 || 145 | v36 || 2 10 ( (, ! { { { { % 1 ApSces 231 J. M. 27 | 12 || 5– 8 || 140 || 35 | 3 10 ( & § { $ (, { { ºrix years 232 | B. E. 37 || 6 || 5– 5 141 || 35 | 3 10 { % § { { \ { { c 233 || G. D. 35 8 5– 9 || 208 || 40 || 3 20 { { { \ $ i. * { 234 J. W. 27 5 5– 7 165 35 2% 30 § { \ { { {. { % 235 | J. St. 37 9 6– 186 || 38 3 15 { { { { { { { { 236 || B. E.g. || 54 || 31 5– 6 || 159 || 37 || 3 40 { { $ (, { % { % 237 F. St. 39 21 5– 6 168 || 38 3 45 { % { % { % { { 238 | D. H. 25 2} | 5– 7 || 175 35 | 2; 20 { % * { { % { % 239 G. Sch. 22 || 2 || 5– 23| 144 34}| 24 || 40 (, i. § { § { $ $ 240 A. O. 43 8 5– 9% 175 35 2} 30 { { & C ( & & & 241 J. B. 52 | 11 || 5– 8 || 190 | 40 || 3 30 { { § {. & & & 4 242 | K. G. 20 || 2 | 5-, 64! 147 | 34 3 40 * * & t $ V. & f 30 Persons employed in Mr. G. EHRET's Brewery, examined by Dr. GUIDo KATZENMAYER.—(Continued.) ā-āl < | | |##| aisläää . . . . . . . ### #5;| < | # |##| ##|###| #5 | f | 3 | .g. 5.8 ‘s; # | | | #5 | ###| ||=3 ** | 3: 3 || 3 & | 3: SPECIAL No. ###| |Age: 3; #7 | #| |#T | ###|###| | # | # ##| | #3 #: # # # |##|##|gā;| #; #= | #: | #F | RPMARKS: R āā; & à |33 || 5 ##| ###| 3° | 3 || 3 || 8 H § O É * | > 3; 3 < *go 243 F. W. 28 # 5–7+| 162 35 | 24 35 G00d G00d. G00d G00d 244 || J. Kl. 39 2} | 5– 24 149 || 36 || 2+ 20 & & & & & & & & 245 St. K. 27 10ml 5– 9 138 35 2} 30 & & ( & & & { { 246 || G. M. | 40 | 16 || 5– 8 || 170 || 36 || 3 20 & & & & & & & 6 247 | F. D. 57 | 12 5–4 || 160 || 37 24 15 & & & & & & { { 248 || G. H. 42 | 12 5– 9 || 149 || 34 24 10 4 & 4 & & & { { 249 || K. L. 26 # 4– 5 | 154 || 35 | 3 20 & & & & tº & & & 250 | A. M. 27 2 || 5– 3}| 148 || 36 24 30 £ & & & & & & & 251 | A. G. 42 1% 5–10%| 163 37 2} 15 & & & & & & & & 252 |M. Sch.| 24 13 5–6; 180 || 36 || 3 30 & & & & & & & ſº 253 | H. B. 24 1} | 5– 9 || 186 36 4 30 & & ( & ( & { { 254 K. R. 35 10 5– 8 || 170 36 2} 25 & & { { & & © & 255 G. E. 27 8 5–4 || 152 32 1+ 10 |Precarious. “ & & ‘‘ On account of 256 G. H. 35 | 10 || 5– 8 || 170 38 || 3 25 G00d. & 4 4 & & & ". 257 J. Sch. 46 1} | 5–10 || 219 || 40 || 3 30 & & & 4 i & & & ºn 258 J. D. 37 2 5– 5 || 146 || 32 || 2 10 & & { { & & & & 259 J. W. 33 2 || 5– 5}| 142 || 34 || 2 30 ( & & & 6 & & 4 260 | P. S. 43 12 5– 8%| 224 42 4 25 & & & & & & & 261 J. L. 34 4 5– 8 180 37 2 20 & & & & { { & & 262 | O. A. 60 4 || 5–64 || 145 || 34 24 15 & & & £ & & & 4 263 || Th. B. 23 # 5– 5 || 145 || 33 24 10 & 6 ( & 6 (; £ 6 264 || R. B. 36 || 11 || 5–10; 181 || 36 3 15 & & { { & t & & 265 J. K. 31 || 10 || 5– 74] 166 35 | 24 40 & & & 4 (, & 266 P. M. 36 1} | 5–8 166 || 35 | 3 25 4 & c { ( & ( & 267 | P. C. 58 || 10 || 5–10%| 217 | 44 24 20 & & ( & 6 (, { { 268 S. B. 24 # 5– 6 || 156 35 | 2% 20 & & $ & (, & 6 269 A. M. 25 5 5– 7 165 34% 2} 30 & 4 { % & 6 * { 270 A. A. 26 5 5– 7 || 218 36 2} 20 & C $ (, ( (. { { 271 H. M. 32 7 5– 6 || 134 || 33 2} 15 ( (. 4 (. { % & 6 272 P. Z. 34 3 5– 23, 185 40 || 3 30 $ 4 ( & « , < 0. 273 | P. Sch. 43 13 5– 7#| 202 || 38 3 10 c { t & $ & { { 274 T. V. 30 4 5– 9 154 34 2} 25 & 4 { { * { { { 275 H. F. 27 5 5– 8 || 161 || 36 2 30 & 4 & & 4 & { { 276 | H. W. 21 1 5– 6 || 136 || 32 2 7 { % & 4 • { t (, 277 | P. B. 28 5 || 5– 9%| 163 || 35 2% 40 ( & ( & 4 & 4 & 278 B. M. 25 # 5– 4 140 33 1+ 20 & 4 $ & ( & { { 279 J. P. S. 43 6 5– 6 179 35 2% 10 (, , & & & 4 c (, 280 A.McD. 18 # 5– 8 || 141 34 || 2 15 { { & 6 (, i. & 6 281 || R. H. 48 3 || 5– 6 || 135 | 32 2 5 ç & $ 4 4 & & 8 282 | H. K. 54 || 9 || 5– 7#| 160 || 35 | 2 20 “ ( & { (, ; 283 || J. M. 38 1} | 5– 7#| 157 35}| 1+ 15 & $ (, t & & $ 284 || M. St. || 37 21 5- 9 196 || 39 2} 25 { % ( : 4 & * @ 285 | E. L. 39 22 || 5– 6%| 168 || 38 2 20 { % c (, & & { { 286 G. B. 26 7 5– 9% 191 38 2 20 * { ( & & & & & 287| L. G. 35 | 16 || 5– 9 || 173 || 38 2 20 ( & { { 4 & * { 288 . A. W. 34 # 5–10 | 193 || 36 2; 20 { % $ & 4 & & © 289 J. B. 21 5 5– 8 177 37 2 40 $ $ (, , & & ( & 290 R. R. 22 1 5– 6 147 33 2 10 * { § {. & & t & 291 L. JH. 36 20 5– 3} 154 35 2} 30 & G { { & & & & 292 | S. St. 30 4 5– 9 || 170 35 2; 25 { % tº $. & & a & Persons employed in Mr. G. EHRET's Brewery, examined by Dr. GUIDo RATZENMAYER.—(Continued.) - , c. .#3 || Pº: 3.5 - 12 ### † ##| || |##| ###|###| # 35 | # ##| SPECIAL No. ###| || Age. 2&# #7 | # £7 ##| f = 3; Eğ ## 3 = := 3 #&# # #T | # |#! ##| ###| #: #| | #3 | ##| RIMARKs, Qi.) Q) Gl) ºf Q) •º Q c3 :- 5's *! H' 53 ###| 3 || 3 |##|###|###| 3° | 3 ||37 || 8 Ad O Prº < *gº 293 P. M. 24 5 5– 9 || 159 || 34 || 3 35 G00d, G00d. | Good. 600d. 294 || O. H. 18 || 4 || 5– 5 || 133 32 24 20 | “ “ “ “ 295 || M. G. 41 || 4 || 5–10 || 178 || 35 24 30 “ “ “ “ 296 || J. K. 31 || 10 || 5– 8 || 169 || 35 | 2 20 { % { % { % { % 297 Th. C. 28 || 9 || 5– 6 157 || 34 2 12 || “ “ & 6 { % 298 |T. M.G.C.| 44 8 || 5– 5%| 162 35}| 2 15 { % { % { { { % 299 || L. Alb. 26 3 || 5– 6 | 168 || 33 || 3 20 { % { { { % { % 300 J. F. 32 5 | 5– 5 || 147 || 32 || 2 15 { % { % { % & 4 Persons employed in Mr. JACOB RUPPERT's Brewery, examined by Dr. GUIDO KATZENMAYER. 301 || J. R. 19 2 5– 7% 143 || 33 3 10 600d. 600d. 600d. G00d. 302 | Chs. R. 23 || 4 || 5– 7 | 188 || 37 || 2 | 10 || “ “ “ “ 303 || G. E. 35 | 18 5–44 180 | 40 || 2 | 20 “ “ “ “ 304 || H. M. 38 || 15 5–4}| 187 || 36 || 4 20 “ { % | { { { % 305 || M. G. 43 29 5–9 186 || 36 || 4 || 40 “ “ “ “ 306 || F. K., 29 || 13 || 5–10 184 || 38 || 3 25 || “. { % ( & * | * 307| W. H. 29 || 1 || 5– 94| 176 || 36 3 20 || “ . . . . . . . “ 308 | FI. M. 35 | 21 5– 6 177 || 3 2 35 { % { % { % { % 309 || J. J. 34 || 17 | 5– 94| 215 41 || 3 | 40 “ “ “ “ 310 || J. B. 29 || 6 || 5– 6 173 || 36 || 2 | 40 || “ “ | ** | ** 311 G. K. 35 16 5– 4 || 205 | 40 || 3 40 ‘‘ Precarious “ “ Had congestion 312| H. S. 34 20 5–6 || 176 || 38 || 3 || 25 | | | God. | * | * | *...* 313| St. K. 30 | 16 || 5- 6, 173 || 36|| 3 | 40 || “ . . . . . “ | **** 314|J. Sch. 27 | 10 | 6– 24 210 | 40 || 3 || 50 | “ “ “ “ 315 J. B. 30 | 11 || 6– #| 187 || 38 || 4 || 3 { { } { { | { { | { { 316 J. G. 23 6 5– 9; 160 || 36 || 3 3 { % { % { % { % 317 | J. D. 41 || 25 || 5–10 | 219 || 39 || 34 || 40 || “ “ “ “ 318 G. R. 25 || 8 || 5– 6; 163 || 36 3 25 || “. { % { % { { 319 || H. Y. 27 6 || 5– 6 || 168 35 | 2 10 (, Ç { { { % { { 320 || R. M. 26 || 11 5– 5}| 150 | 35 | 2+ 25 | “ { { } { { } { { 321 | M. F. 27 5 5– 8; 183 35 2} 30 { % { % { % { % 322 ||P. Sch. 27 | 3 || 5– 6%| 154 || 35 || 2 | 20 “ “ “ “ 323 P. A. | 39 || 5 || 5– 9 || 183 || 38 3 15 “ “ “ “ 324 | F. K. 25 || 2 | 5– 84 175 37 || 2 || 30 || “ “ “ “ 325 J. D. 41 || 24 || 5– 94, 191 || 36 34 || 50 “ “ “ “ 326 H. G. 36 || 14 || 4– 6 || 170 35 24 25 || “ “ “ “ 327 | F. H. 44 16 || 5– 84, 170 || 36 || 2 || 3 { { } { { } { { | { { 328 |G. Sch. 41 20 5– 5 223 | 40 24 || 25 || “ { % { % { % 329 || J. L. 28 16 || 6– 163 || 35 | 4 50 { % { { { % { { 330 | M. E. 41 || 21 5– 94| 215 39 24 || 30 “ “ “ “ 331 A. G. 28 # 5–64 156 35 24 30 “ “ “ “ 332 J. H. 33 17 | 5– 6 || 136 || 35 | 24 20 { % { { { % { % 333 J. F. 28 || 11 5– 7#| 165 | 38 2 25 || “ “ { % { % 32 Persons employed in Mr. JACOB RUPPERT's Brewery, examined by Dr. GUIDO KATZENMAYER.—(Continued.) e É 3 . 5 : | #: @ º ää 5 || 3 || 3 || || 3 | Eğä |&##| g . 3 || 3 || 3 ‘S 2'3 #5; gă # |##|jã ºff #5 | E. ig .º. 3.5 5 § ##| | | | ##| | ###| | E3 ºf 35 | 3 ; ; ; ; SPECIAL No. 3 Å = | Age. jää gº .c. #! £5 : a 5 g; # ::.P. #5 := 3 #: #35 #! # ##| ###|g; # #: #3 # #F | REMARKS. H ſº C. : : 9 $2, c. 3rg | #3, # Q) O O O Sº 3H g R 5: #5 R šā | # 5 # | * O O O ſº O Prº 3 #3 334 V. O. 36 14 5– 83 209 || 42 24 15 G00d. G00d. G00d G00d. 335 | L. R. 31 5 5– 94 187 35 2} 10 & & & & { { { { 336 | E. L. | 44 12 5– 9 167 34 1} 25 & & & & { { & & 337 Ch. St. 34 20 5– 9; 180 37 24 25 & & & & é & & & 338 Ch. O. 58 10 6– 220 || 41 2 5 & & & & & & & & 339 F. K. 25 12 5– 7+ 149 35 14 40 ( & & & & & & & 340 J. R. 30 14 5– 3}| 157 37 3 50 & & 6 & ( & & & 341 | H. G. 29 15 5– 8 180 || 36 3 25 & & & & { { & & 342 || C. P. 25 11 6– 1 | 191 || 36 4 30 & 6 & e & & & & 343 || J. Sch. 22 2 5– 8 || 151 || 35 2} 25 ſ & £ tº ( & 6 & 344 || W. L. 43 19 5–7, 171 39 2 15 & & & £ { { g & 345 A. M. 26 2} | 5– 8 || 248 || 41 || 2+ 40 & & & & ( & 6 & 346 || J. K. 65 17 5– 8 || 208 || 38 2} 15 & 4 & & & & 6 & 347 J. K. 29 5 5– 7 || 152 || 36 2 20 & & & & & & & & 348 G. K. 24 6 || 5– 5 | 162 | 35 | 2 25 { % 4 & & & 6 & 349 || J. W. 30 9 5- 8 175 35 2 25 & & & & & & & 4 350 F. R. 22 6 5– 8 174 35 2} 50 & & & & & & & & 351 | K. B. 34 14 5– 8 || 182 42 2 15 ( & & & 4 & g & 352 J. K. 39 14 5– 8 192 || 38 2} 25 |PreCarious] ** & & “ Eſad Endocardi- 353 | Th. N. 30 1} | 5– 6}| 156 || 35 | 3 10 G00d. & K ( & & & tis, caused by 354 | F. St. 20 1} | 5– 7# 155 35 | 2% 25 & & & & & & & & #. 355 | P. B. 30 10 5–11 | 183 || 36 3 20 { { { { & © * { in 1886. 356 J. D. 30 4 4– 5 148 35 2} 20 * & & 6 ( & * & 357 A. T. 32 6 5– 2} 146 35 2 25 & 4 { { t & & 4 358 J. W. 54 7 5– 3 || 146 34 2 25 & & & & * { & & 359 G. K. 19 # 5– 5% 152 35 2} 20 { { ( & & & { { 360 || C. D. 3 12 5– 6, 185 38 3 25 & & t & { { * * 361 J. W. 29 8 5–11 188 38 3 15 & & i & & 4 t & 362 || M. H. 31 19 5– 7 | 163 || 36 3 40 { { & & & & & £ 363 J. E. 41 4} | 5–11 214 39 3 40 & g ( & & 4 • { 364 K. B. 43 6 5–4 || 159 || 35 2 40 & 4 & & & £ £ & 365 || R. N. 31 14 5– 8 || 166 36 3 25 & & & C t & { { 366 || A. Pf. 27 14 5– 7 || 159 || 35 2 30 & & & & & & { { 367 || R. L. 29 2 5— 3 || 135 | 34 2 15 ( & & C { { * & 36S A. Sch. 26 2 5- 8 || 164 || 35 2 25 { { { { ( & ! { 369 | Ch. V. 49 20 5— 73 181 | 3S 2 25 & & & 4 & & & $ 370 J. O. 46 16 5– 64 150 | 36 2 25 { % & & { % * { 371 F. R. 16 + 5– 7 | 161 || 33 2 (5 & & & & & 4 & { 372 W. K. 22 2 5–4 || 151 || 34}| 3 15 ( & & & & & t ºf 373 | F. R. 22 1 5–11}| 207 || 38 5 15 { { & £ & & & & 37.4 Ch. Kl. 24 3 6– 13 | 186 42 3 20 4 & & & & & { { 375 J. M. 37 5% 5– 7#| 216 || 41 3 30 { { { { { { £ & 37 K. D 22 4 5–11 || 178 || 35 2 5 & & & & i & { { 377 || F. M. 31 6} | 5– 7 || 141 34 2} 20 & & * { i & i & 378 J. G. R. 18 1 5– 7 || 182 34 3 10 & t & & i & & ( 379 A. T. 23 5 5–10 182 35 2} 25 t & { { { { * { 3S0 | G. H. 35 34 5– 5 162 | 35 2 10 & & & 4 £ 6 & 4 381 | M. N. 38 14 5–10 216 || 41 3 25 { { { { * & 6 & 382 W. B. 33 3 5– 6 | 1.47 || 36 1; 20 & & { % { % ( \, 383 J. M. 29 13 5– 7 #| 191 || 3 3 | 40 & & { { § { { { 33 z Persons employed in Mr. JACOB RUPPERT's Brewery, examined by Dr. GUIDO KATZENMAYER.—(Continued ) • º–4 F. º da 9 # - . I C ..: 3 = | 5: # *— - 3.E 3 3 | # g { | 53.3 |& 5 # | 3 | | 8 ‘s ‘5 rº-3 e §, c. $–4 +-> fº º -> an ### † | ##| || |##|###|##| # #5 ##| ##| SPECIAL No. # Age ºf #| | | |#| | ###|###| # # # # #&# ###| #4 # |##|###| || 3 || # #5 # ## REMARKs, H' 5: *F # • - 5 Q) 5 §3 | F 3rd : G = C C O O Q ###| = | = |##|agā |###| & O O Ö =- ſº © à | 3 #3 384 || A. W. 35 4 || 5– 5 || 171 35 | 2 50 600d. GOOd. G00d G00d. 385 A. G. 31 || 7 || 5–11 || 178 || 36 || 34 || 25 | “ “ | “ “ 386 || A. G. 23 || 7 || 5–5; 143 || 34 2 20 “ & & & & & & 387 | P. E. 25 | 14 || 5–8 160 | 35 | 2 25 | < * | * * & & I & & 388 F. W. 32 6 5–64 186 36 || 3 40 & 4 & & & “ & & 389 || K. R. 31 5 5– 94| 195 || 39 2} 15 & & & & & & & & 390 A. B. 36 16 6– 2} 239 40 3 20 & C & & & & & & 391 || M. B. 30 3 5– 7 || 177 35 3 12 & & & & & & 4 & 392 || I. Ph. 36 | 10 || 5– 7 || 151 35 | 24 30 “ | “ & & I & & 393 | D. H. 34 || 11 || 5–84 222 || 41 || 3 || 10 || “ “ “ “ 394 | F. Z. 37 5 5– 63, 164 || 37 2 30 { { C & & & & & 395 || J. S. 24 6 5– 84| 169 || 34 || 3 15 & & & & & & © & 396 A. H. 36 22 5–10 168 36 2} 20 & & & & & & & & 397 J. R. 24 9 5–9 186 37 2+ 35 & & & & & & & & 398 || D. M. 42 28 5– 5 | 159 || 36 2} 30 & & & & & & & & 399 || P. L. 34 20 | 6– 213 || 39 || 4 25 | “ & 4 & & & & 400 J. O. 35 20 5— 3% 182 37 2} 20 & 4 & & & 4 & 4 401 || J. Sch. 40 24 || 5– 8 175 | 36 || 3} 15 4 & & & & 4 & & 402 || G. G. 41 22 6–11 200 38 34 30 { { & 4 { { & & 403 || K. N. 30 4 5–11 || 211 | 40 3 50 & & & 6 & 6 & & 404 || K. H. 25 | 11 || 5–4}| 140 || 34 || 3 15 “ “ & & & & 405 || G. S. 37 13 5– 8 || 180 36 3 25 ( & & & & & & & 406 | P. H. 37 | 18 5– 5}| 210 || 41 24 | 12 || “ “ & & & & 407 || J. E. 27 || 4 || 5–10 | 165 || 36 24 || 25 || “ & 6 & & & & 408 || J. St. 20 # 5–10 || 174 || 35 3. 10 & & & & & 4 4 & 409 W. B. 35 | 19 5– 7 || 176 41 2 30 “ & & & 4, & & 410 || A. G. 45 | 20 | 5–10 || 171 || 36 || 3 25 || “ & 4 ( & & & 411 | A. S. 31 | 15 5– 8%. 171 35 | 24 20 “ & © & 4 & & 412. R. K. 35 10 5–10; 176 34 2 15 & & & & ( & & & 413 | L. M. 29 3 5– 8 220 | 40 2} 40 & & & & & & & & #14|| R. N. 19 || 3 || 5–7%. 149 || 3 || 3 || | | | | | | | | | Had 415 || Ph. B. 40 | 20 | 5– 8 || 175 || 36 || 3 30 “ . . . ºf 416 J. Sch. 35 || 5 || 5–9 163 37 3 30 “ 4 & & © & & 417 G. R. 33 16 5–10 || 175 || 35 3. 25 & & & & & & & & 418 J. McA. 55 || 3 || 5– 5 163 35 | 2 10 || “ & 6 || & 4 & & 419 || J. K. 52 9 5– 6 188 || 38 || 3 50 ( & C & & & & & 420 | A. Sch. 23 7 5– 7 || 170 37 24 20 & & & & & 4 & & 421 | A. K. 25 3. 5– 5 147 || 33 2} 25 & & & & & & • & 422 J. A. 29 1+ 5– 8 || 135 | 33 2% 10 & & & & & & & & 423 J. B. 33 20 | 6– 1 || 212 38 2} 20 & & & 4 & & & © 424 | E. J. 40 7 5–4 | 181 | 38 3 25 & & & & & 4 6 & 425 | Ch. T. 38 9 || 5– 6%| 173 || 36 1+ 20 & & & & ( & & & 426 || J. H. 59 5 5–113| 184 || 36 24 10 * & & 4 & & $ 4 427 G. J. 40 25 5– 8; 194 || 37 || 3 40 | ** { { & & ) { { 428 H. W. 28 7 5– 6 || 158 35 | 3 30 & & { % & & & 4 429 G. Pf. 31 17 5– 8% 188 37 4 30 ( & & & { % & & 430 | F. S. 28 8 5– 6%| 147 || 33 || 3 30 & & & & $ & 6 & 431 P. J. 30 2} | 5– 6 170 || 36 4 20 & 4 • & & 4 & & 432 L. St. 37 | 20 5– 5 | 190 3S 2} 50 & 4 & & é & 66 433 L. B. 23 | 9 || 5–11 172 | 36 3 20 || “ “ {{ || 4 & 34 Persons employed in Mr. JACOB RUPPERT's Brewery, examined by Dr. GUIDO KATZENMAYER.—(Continued.) a £ a . 3 - | ### e āa ś # | g | . § | Eğ5 |33 # s * * = &–4 3 g? É; ...} | # |##|..}}|##| #5 | f | 3 || 3 ...tº 3.5 *''' | | E3 | £5 3 #5 | E S ** | 3 5 || 3 & | 3: SPECIAL No || 3 #3 |Age: º #| | | | #T | ###|###| # ## ÉÉ #3 #&# ###| # # #| #3 ||3:3#| #: #5 #3 ##| | REMARKs, H ºr Fº: 5: QX 53 F 3-3 | #3; q) O C C C ###| # | * |#5 agā ###| & O O O ſº o & " | ##3 434 J. Sch. 27 6 5– 8%| 168 35 | 2 40 | Good. | 600d. G00d. G00d. 435 | J. E. 23 4 || 5–44 154 || 35}| 2 20 & 6 $ 6 6 (, $ (, 436 || Fr. W. 32 || 11 || 5– 5 | 162 || 36 24 25 & 6 § { 6 (; $6 437 Ch. H. 42 28 5– 5+| 177 || 36 2} 15 ( (. $ 6 6 (, ( & 438 J. K. 48 || 11 || 5–10}| 207 || 39 || 44 20 ( (. 4 & { { & C. 439 K. Sch.| 24 7 5–11 | 184 || 35}| 3} 20 $ 6 6 (; { % { % 440 | W. B. 30 10 5- 7# 162 35 2} 25 ( (. ( & (, , £ 6 441 J. H. 32 6 || 5– 3 || 141 35 | 2+ 30 ( & $ (, { { 6 (; 442 A. G. 42 25 5–10}| 198 || 38 24 60 { % { % { % ( (. 443 Gºtf. T. 31 | 16 || 5–5; 178 37 4 50 { % “ |Precarious “ |Had acute Con- 444 || G. L. 44 || 25 || 5–10%| 170 || 34+ 2} 25 { % § { G00d. { % º 445 Ch. F. 41 || 12 5– 7# 176 || 34}| 2} 25 ( & { % § { ( & . 36 years 446 || Ed. El. 33 || 17 | 5– 8 || 195 || 37 || 5 25 { % $ t & 6 & 6 e 447 K. R. 23 6 || 5– 7 156 || 34 2 30 ( { & 6 { { (, , 448 G. B. 37 || 14 5– 5 | 168 || 36 2 10 6 (, { % { { § { 449 J. M. 44 5 5– 8 169 35% 2+ 20 & 9 ( & & 6 & 6 450 | Chs. R. 25 # 5–9 167 34 2 15 { { { % { { & 6 451 || R. M. 30 5 5– 74] 178 38 4 30 { % $ 6 & 6 & 6 452 G. H. 37 4} | 5 - 7#| 151 34}| 2} 15 & 6 { { $ 6 6 (; Persons employed in Messrs. G. RINGLER & Co.'s Brewery, examined by Dr. GUIDO KATZENMAYER. 453 O. D. 36 21 || 5– 8%. 224 44 2+ 20 | Good. | Good. G00d. | Good. 454 || J. St. 26 4; 5–8+ 187 37 3 12 ( (. { { { % & C. 455 | F. B. 19 3 || 5–10;| 178 || 35 | 3 25 ( & { { { { { % 456 | L. J. 34 5 5–4}| 163 || 35 2} 18 ( & { % { { ( (. 457 | F. H. 34 13 || 5–5; 172 || 37 2+ 25 ( & ( , { % • { { 458 || B. V. 38 10 || 5– 9; 162 || 36 24 25 { % { { { % & 6 459 J. J. 22 9 || 5– 7 || 153 || 35 2 20 { { { % { % & 6 460 | G. R. 35 6 5–11 | 186 || 37 2 25 § { 6 & 6 (; ( & 461 G. H. 31 5 || 5–10 | 191 || 38 || 3 25 { % { { { % { % 462 J. H. 36 | 19 || 6– 1 | 195 || 38 3 30 6 (; 6 (, 6 & { % 463 || A. H. 35 | 18 5–6%; 193 || 39 3 25 { { (, , { % € 6 464 || W. K. 25 8 5– 6# 165 || 35 3 25 { { { { { { ( & 465 | Ch. H. 40 | 12 || 5–4}| 146 35 | 1% 25 { { { % { % 6 & 466 || A. H. 38 18 5- 8%| 204 40 2 25 { % ( & { % & 6 467 K. W. 40 20 5–8; 154 35 | 24 25 ( (. { % { % c (, 468| W. Sch.| 34 16 || 5–8; 161 || 36 || 3 20 ( & { % { % ( & 469 | L. Z. 33 4 6–2 || 239 || 41 2#. 25 { % { % { { & 6 470 A. V. 39 || 21 | 5–4 || 147 35 | 2 20 ( & 6 & ( & 6 & 471 J. B. 35 6 || 5–8; 207 || 42 2 25 $ 6 ( (. { % 66 472 A. F. 83 15 5–4 155 34 2; 35 { % { % { % 6 & 473] J. Sch. 38 22 || 5–5 | 168 36 2} 20 (, i. § { { % { % 474 | Ch. W. 29 || 11 5– 4 || 149 || 33 || 3 30 { % £ 6 & 6 66 475 | H. K. 28 || 11 || 5–7%. 186 || 38 || 3 30 & ſº ( (. & & 66 35 Persons employed in Messrs G. Risgirr & Co.'s Brewery, examined by Dr. GUIDO KATZENMAYER (Continued.) # = É ad ad a 4. 2.É ă ää # à &l- tº-4 &–4 3 gº 㺠# | # ##| || 55 ºã | #3 || 3 || 3 g | 8 No. # Age §:1 # i # # É. # §§ | # # SPECIAL .3 ± ge.| 33 | "T Q} £5 : g; gº ::.P. := : #&# ### #! § # ### gā; # #5 #: ##| | REMARKS. H ſº äää É | # ##| 5 # ###| || 3° 3 3 3 3"; #C | T 53 | g 5 : ſº O ſº 2. āş 476 J. M. 20 # 5–4 || 146 || 34 24 20 G00d 600d G00d 000d 477 | F. Pf. 23 # 5– 8 || 172 || 35 3 15 § { & & & & & & 478 || F. K. 48 20 5–64 180 36 2 10 & & & & & & & & 479 | E. N. 32 9 5– 7#| 182 | 36 2} 15 & & & & & & & & 480 J. S. 39 4 5–6; 179 38 2} 25 & & & & & & ( & 481 | M. M. 28 18 5– 8 || 159 || 35 2#. 20 4 & & & & & & & 482 | B. Hitz 36 10 5– 9 || 231 40 2} 40 & & & & { % & & 483 | Ch. R. 51 39 5–10 || 258 43 3 40 & & & & & & & & 484 || J. G. 51 40 5– 8 || 198 || 38 3 20 & & & & & & & & 485 || G. D. 37 21 5– 6+| 153 35 2 20 & & & & & & & & 486 || P. S. 39 25 5– 8 165 || 37 2% 20 & & ( & & & & 4 487 J. N. 41 7 5– 8 || 178 36 2} 20 & & & & & & & & 488 || F. Kl. 22 3 5–10 || 179 || 37 2} 25 { % & & & & & & 489 || A. K. 27 5 5- 7%. 155 35 2} 20 { { & & £ 6. & & 490 J. N. 33 10 5– 7 || 155 35 2} 20 & & ( & & 6 & & 491 K. J. 33 14 || 5– 6 || 174 37 2} 15 & & & & & & 6 & 492 | F. Z. 42 16 5– 3}| 169 || 36 2} 25 & & & & 4 & & & 493 || J. A. | 40 13 5–10%| 182 | 35 2} 40 • & & & & & & & 494 | A. B. 24 5 5–11 | 213 || 39 || 3 20 & & & & & & & & 495 || J. H. 33 10 5– 7%| 187 || 37 2% 15 & & & & & & ( & 496 || J. R. 24 15 5- 9%| 162 | 34 24 30 & 6 ( & & C. { { 497 J. Sch. 20 8 5– 7 | 180 || 36 2 15 & & & & & 6 & & 498 W. IF. 31 7 5– 9; 180 38 3 20 & & & & (, tº 6 499 || A. H. 28 1} | 6–1, 221 39 3 8 & & & 4 $ & 6 & 500 M. G. 28 9 5– 9% 180 37 - 3 35 & & ( & & 6 & 8 501 || K. St. 34 6 5– 7 || 194 | 39 3 35 & 4 ( & $ & 6 502 || F. K. 36 8 5– 8 || 182 37 2} 25 & 4 & & & 4 & 6 503 | H. Z. 45 12 5–11+| 163 || 37 2 20 & 6 ( (. ( (. ( & 504 || Ch. W. 63 16 5– 7 || 171 36 2} 12 { { ( & & 6 6 (; 505 || F. K. 27 2 5– 9; 163 35 2} 30 £ 6 { { & G & 4 506 | E. Z. || 44 9 5–10 || 176 36 2} 30 & 6 & & & 6 4 (. 507 || O. H. 19 # 5– 6%| 146 || 33 2 18 & & & & 6 tº & & 508 || M. A. | 36 4} | 5– 5 172 36 2 20 $ & & & & & { & 509 || J. K. 26 2} | 5– 5%| 171 || 36 3 25 { % & 4 & 4 & 4 510 | Fr. H. 24 10 5–64 180 || 39 24 30 ( & & & & 4 & 6 511 || W. B. 36 15 5– 8;| 181 || 36 3 30 & & & & & & & & 512 ||W. L. D. 33 1} | 5– 6 144 31 2 10 { % 6 & & & 6 & 513 | A. K. 35 19 5–10%| 176 | 38 1} 40 & & & 6 ( & & 6 514 | X. W. 40 23 5– 5 || 159 || 37 2 30 & & & 6 & & & 4 515 . H. St. 45 20 5- 9 || 203 || 37 3 10 |Precarious] ** & & “ Had Endocardi- 516 | F. K. 34 # 6–2 | 181 37 || 3 20 G00d. & C & 4 & & tis, tº: ; 517 | J. G. 37 19 4— 5 | 150 | 34 2} 10 { % ( & & & ( & #. 518 J. T. 26 3 5–3; 142 || 35 2 20 ( (. & C & & & & in 1886. 519 | E. D. 44 2} | 5–3 || 147 36 2 25 { % ( & & & & & 520 | Ch. F. 37 19 5–8; 167 || 36 3 20 ( & { % & © * (, 521 || J. W.' | 27 3+ | 5–6%; 168 || 36 3 20 { { ( & & & & 4 522. | F. G. S. 22 1 5– 8 || 157 || 34 2 10 { % { { & & & & 523 W. R. 19 2 5– 5 || 137 || 33 2 12 6 (, ( (. & & & 6 524 F. M. F. 45 30 5– 8 || 169 || 37 3 30 & 4 ( & & & & © 525 | F. K. 29 8 5– 84, 189 || 3 2} 25 & C 6 & 6 & & & 36 Persons employed in Messrs. G. RINGLER & Co.'s Brewery, examined by Dr. GUIDO KATZENMAYER.—(Continued.) e gº i ! ..., ſº 9 : ‘S . 3 = | 5: ; *— - ###| 3 || 3 | ##| =#| ##| 3 | | 3 || 3 | | 3 ### ##" | ##| || |##| ### # ## 5; ā; ā; special No. # Age. ###| # # #7 | ###| ###| E3 | # | # | ## | | ### ###| # # |##| #3| 3; # #5 # ##| || REMARKs, H' 53 äää É ; ##| =#| ###| #3 || 3 || 3" | 3 §ºg | * #5 Tää ###| * ſº £r. 3 * ſº 526 || C. R. 45 6 5–9 | 182 | 36 2} 10 Good. | Good, 600d. | Good. 527 J. Sch. 32 10 5– 7% 192 37 2 20 { { * { { { { { 528 || M. W. 28 || 7 || 5– 5}| 162 || 35 | 2 15 “ { % $ $ { { 529| K. T. 32 || 8 || 5–64 159 || 35 || 2 | 20 || “ “ “ “ 530 || K. A. | 36 || 3} | 6– 14 189 || 37 2} | 15 “ “ “ “ 531 J. H. 49 || 5 || 6– 2 | 169 || 36 || 2 | 20 “ “ “ “ 532 Ch. H. 38 || 5 || 5–8 185 37 24 20 “ “ “ “ 533| A. B. 28 || 6 || 5–64 172 38 2; 25 “ “ “ “ 534 F. Sch. 40 || 8 || 5–7 184 || 37 || 2 | 15 “ “ | “ “ 535 | Ch. J. 32 || 7 || 5– 5}| 160 || 36 || 2 || 25 || “ “ “ “ Persons employed in Messrs. F. & M. SoHAEFER Brewing Co., examined by Dr. GUIDO KATZENMAYER. 536 J. B. 37 24 5–7, 200 || 394 3% 6 Good. | Good. | Good. G00d. 537 J. D. 34 6 5–10; 245 || 39 4 12 § { { { { % { { 538 F. L. 52 7 5– 8 || 138 34 2 8 { { { { § { { { 539 | E. S. 37 1 5– 7 | 165 36 2} 15 - * { { { % { { 540 G. M. 30 # 5– 6 160 || 35 2} 20 { { { { { % { { 541 || M. M. 35 20 5–10%| 218 || 39 3 30 { % { % { { ( (. 542 J. R. 20 1 5–83; 186 || 37 3 25 { { { { { { { { 543 || W. B. 46 25 5– 7 || 250 44}| 2} 10 { { { { § { { { 544 J. B. 28 12 5–10 | 198 || 36 5 30 { % { { * { { { 545 J. W. 25 10 5– 7 || 173 || 35 3 30 { { { { § { { { 546 J. K. 42 20 5– 9 || 177 || 36 4 30 § { ( (. { { { { 547 K. T. 27 11 5– 7 || 175 34 3} 30 { % { % { % { { 548 FZ. T. 45 14 5– 8 188 39 3} 30 { { { { { { { % 549 J. W. 28 12 5–6%; 155 33 3 35 { { { { § { { % 550 | W. E. 30 8 5– 8 150 | 35 3 40 { { { { { { { { 551 Ch. W. 32 9 5– 5 | 163 || 36 2% 25 { { { { { { { % 552 | W. B. 27 10 5- 94 203 || 38 3 20 { { { { { { { % 553 | F. K. 36 20 5– 5 150 || 33 2 25 § { { { § { $ (, 554 | F. Sch. 26 8 5–84 180 37 2; 40 { { { { { { { % 555 O. Sch. 27 12 5–5 | 180 || 38}| 2} 40 { { { % { { * { 556 Ch. K. 43 15 5–10}| 185 37 4 25 { % { { * { { { 557 | L. M. 32 20 5– 54; 175 36 2% 25 { { { { § { { { 558 || H. B. 19 # 5–84 175 34 || 2: . 30 { { { { { { { { 559 || A. Kl. 26 12 5— 73, 185 35 2} 30 & 4 { { § { { { 560 | H. D. 38 20 5–10}| 204 || 38%. 3% 25 { { { { { { { { 561 | M. Sch. 39 15 5– 7+| 195 37 3 25 { { § { { { { { Hºwe 562 J. R. 29 9 5–7; 190 38 4 30 { { { { { { { % - 563 H. Sch. 34 6 5– 6%| 162 || 34 2 20 { { { { { { { { 564 W. O. 25 10 5– 7 208 39 3 35 { { { { { { { % 565 A. F. 37 22 5– 9 || 187 || 39 4} 30 ( & { { { % { { 566 J. F. 45 7 5– 2 | 134 || 33 1} 20 { { { { & © { { 37 Persons employed in Messrs. F. & M. SCHAFFER Brewing Co., examined by Dr. GUIDO KATZENMAYER.—(Continued.) ~ à C É ad ad sº == ;: Śā § 3 &-s &–s &—t | 3 a 5 #iš | # | # |##| ## :# #5 | E. ig 25.5 ##| | ## | T | ##| ###|33 | # 5 § 5 # 35 | SPECIAL No. 3 #5 | Age. §§ #7 | # |&T | ###| 33 g | Eğ ## ##| | #3 # |*|†:#| # # |##|##|| 3:#| # #5 | # ##| REMARKs, ſº © à 3 #3 567 | F. K. 28 6 5– 8 185 | 37 4 20 | Good. G00d. G00d, Good * 568 Th. B. 36 6 5– 5 || 140 || 33 2+ 20 ( & & & & & ( & 569 || Th. L. 26 1} | 5–7%. 170 35 | 2+ 20 { % { { & & & & 570 A. S. 26 1% 5– 8% 170 35} 2} 20 { { ( (. & & & & 571 J. K. 45 | 15 5–7%. 175 || 36 24 25 § { { % * & & & 572 | W. M. 35 2} | 5–64 156 35 | 3 15 ( (. { { & & & & 573 J. K. 41 8+ 5–10+ 200 39 4 15 ( (. ( (. & 4 { % 574 || R. K. 25 2 || 5–83 | 168 || 36|| 3 20 { { { { ( & & & 575 |Fz. Sch. 37 22 5–10 210 || 39 34 20 { { & & & & & 4 576 | P. N. 36 20 5– 5 | 180 || 37 4 20 § { & & & 4 & 4 577 | F. N. 32 | 15 5– 8+| 155 34 || 13 25 { { ( . & 4 { { 578 Fk. Pf. 26 7 5–8; 180 || 36|| 24 25 { { { { & 4 ( & 579 | E. Sch. 30 14 5- 53' 172 36% 2 20 { { { { & & & & 580 J. D. 32 3} 5– 2 135 | 31 2 20 ( & { { & 4 & & 581 | F. M. 28 5 5–8; 185 34 4 20 { % { { 6 & & & 582 Ch. K. 51 5 || 5– 5 | 160 35 | 3 20 { { { { & & & & 583 || A. E. 28 4 5–10 | 195 || 37 || 4 25 { { { { & 4 { { 584 W. B. 23 4 5– 9; 168 || 36 3 30 “ ( ; & 4 { { 585 H. B. 34 || 15 6– #| 186 35 | 3 25 { { { { & & { { 586 H. H. 33 6 || 5– 8 || 204 || 37 || 3 25 { { { { & & & g 587 J. B. 41 63 5– 6%. 230 42 2% 20 $ (, G. G. & 4 & & 588 GHV. T. 20 5 || 5–11}| 163 34 4 15 { { { { & 4 £ & 589 || A. St. 23 10 5–4 | 165 || 35 2 8 { { { { & & & & 590 J. W. 39 5 5– 6+ 1.70 || 36 3 20 { { { { & 4 { { 591 A. D. 27 4 5– 8 200 || 38 || 44 20 { { “ |Precarious “ |Had acute Con- 592 || F. D. 23 8 5–11}| 178 || 35 | 3} 20 { { ( & G00d. & & gestion o #. 593 || K. F. 31 7 | 5–11 | 190 || 36 || 4 25 ( & { { & 4 ( & #inº § 594 || A. Sch. 43 || 25 5–11}| 195 || 37 2} 20 & 6 { { & & & 8 years ago. 595 A. E. 28 16 5– 4# 165 35 2% 20 { { { { & & ( & 596 || A. Sch. 36 2 5– 3} 173 || 36 2 15 { { { { & & ( & 597 V. H. 45 9 || 5–4%| 152 35 | 2% 20 { { ( (. { { & & 598 || J. Sch. 48 14 5– 6 162 | 35 | 3 20 { { ( & { { & & 599 || J. R. 30 7 || 5–11 | 185 || 34 2% 35 ( & ( & & & & & 600 J. F. 37 4 5– 7% 189 36 2} 20 { { { { & & & & 601 || H. E. 43 6 5–6; 165 37 || 3 20 { % { { { { { { 602 || W. V. 37 || 17 | 5– 9 || 270 43 34 25 { { { { ( & § { 603 || G. Ch. 54 11 || 5– 7 | 163 37}| 13 35 { { { { & & { { 604 || FZ. B. 28 8 5–10+| 175 36 || 3 30 { { t (, • & & & 605 || J. D. 42 19 || 5– 7 | 190 37}| 3 15 { { { { { { & & 606 | Ch. B. 39 24 5– 8 || 163 || 34 24 20 { % { % & ! & & 607 || J. S. 44 14 || 5–4}| 137 ||34 || 14 15 { { { % ( ; { { 608 || Chs. N. 25 | 11 || 5– 9 || 179 || 35 | 3 50 { { { { { { ( & Persons employed in Mr. FR. OPPERMANN's (JR.) Brewery, examined by Dr. GUIDO KATZENMAYER. w C. P. 30 6 || 5–11 192 || 39 2} 30 | 600d. G00d. | Good. | Good. 610 | Ch. G. 42 || 5 || 5–104, 184 || 37 23 || 25 || “ { { & & & & 38 Persons employed in Mr. FR. OPPERMANN’s (JR.) Brewery, examined by Dr. GUIDo KATZENMAYER.—(Continued.) e º– º: = ~ ā # - É ad # 35 | =#á 33 Å s *—s º- &—t a 2% É5; # | 3 ||3}} | .35 | E3 | #4 || 8 2 : 2 ### †† #3 i ÉÉ | ##|āsº | # | 35 | ## | ## | SPECIAL 3# |Age: 3; #7 | #| |#T | ###|###| | # # #5 | #3 #3: ###| #| | # |##| ###|g:#| # | #5 #: #= | REMARKs. F. Tº äää Tà || 3 |##|###|###| 35 | 3 || 3" | 3 H 5 § 9 as | > = 3 ſº H | 3 ºf: J. M. 18 2 5– 5+ 123 30 || 34 7 600d G00d G00d (000 J. H. 35 11 5– 8 || 252 || 44 3 50 & & 6 & & & 4 & M. L. 53 40 5– 6 198 || 41 2 7 & & & 4 { % & º M. St. 33 16 5–10 || 256 || 45 2} 25 & & & & é & & & R. L. 39 15 5– 7 155 37 2} 15 a 'c { { & & { { H. K. 21 2 5– 9 || 166 || 36 3} 25 { { & £ & & & & M. R. 25 7 5– 7 157 35 2 30 & & 4 & 4 & & & P. Ch. , 26 13 O- 8} 176 || 37 2} 40 & & ( & é & & & G. D. 28 12 5– 5; 157 38 2 20 & “ & & & 4 & J. J. 21 10 5– 8 154 || 36 3 40 é & 4 & ( & { { G. J. 29 17 5– 5} 142 33 2 20 & 4 & & t { ( & H. B. 33 12 5– 8 | 185 | 39 3 20 & & & & ( & 4 & K. L. 28 4 5– 8 172 || 38 2 25 & & & & { { { % G. B. 30 | 12 5– 94| 178 || 38 2} 30 & 4 & & & & { { E. K. 33 5 5– 6%| 158 || 36 2 40 & 6 { { { { 4 & J. N. 49 17 5– 7 175 36 1% 25 & & & & { { £ 4 W. M. 41 7 6– 1 || 230 || 43 2 15 & & & & { { g & M. M. 19 4 5– 4; 129 32 2 10 & & § & & * { W. R. 29 3 5–10 | 165 35 2} 20 { { & & { { & & Th. F. 39 12 5– 6 205 38%| 4 15 § { & & ( & & 6 J. D. 49 || 3 || 5– 7 | 186 || 41 || 3 20 “ “ { { | g ∈ R. C. 24 8 |.5— 5%| 162 || 34 3 15 & 4 { { & 4 * { J. B. 32 16 5- 8 || 179 || 38 3 15 & & & { ( ; * { J. D. 35 5 5– 8; 168 35 2} 35 & © & & 4 & & £ J. Z. 28 13 5– 7# 168 36 2 50 & 4 & 4 & 4 & & A. R. 32 7 5– 7+ 253 || 43 3 50 & ( & & & ſº £ 6 A. O. 33 4 || 5–11}| 186 37 3 15 & & { { & 4 & & G. W. 30 15 5–8, 190 39 2} 40 4 & £ 4 * { & 4 A. Sch. 50 30 5– 94| 168 || 36 || 2 45 £ & & & & 4 & & P. S. 30 13 5– 6 | 166 || 35 3 30 4 & ( & & & { A. H. 29 7 5–11}| 270 || 44 2 40 & 4 & & & & W. A. | 34 8 5– 5%| 165 36 2% 25 4 & & & { { J. K. 39 || 23 5– 7 || 190 || 39 3 20 & & & & & & & 4 L. M. 26 5 5– 9 || 170 | 36 2} 25 & © & 4 { { { % C. K. 38 6 5- 8, 173 || 38 2% 15 t & & 4 { { { { A. Sch. 31 | 18 5– 2 | 1.40 || 35 | 2 15 & & & & & 4 & J. R. 34 16 5– 6; 195 || 39 3 20 { & & & { % & 4 H. E. 40 || 20 5–4}| 143 35 2% 20 { { & 8 & 4 & 4 D. Sch. 30 7 5– 9 165 38 2 50 & & { { & 4 & & Fr. Fr. 40 || 25 5– 74] 163 37 2 30 4 & & 6 & & & & Ch. S. 26 14 5– 8 || 176 || 37 3 50 { { & & £ & { { A. M. 26 7 5– 8%| 155 34 2} 50 & 4 { % $ & 8 P. W. 25 | 12 || 5– 9 184 || 37 || 4 50 & & { { 4 & { J. B. 29 12 5– 9% 182 38 2 40 & & 4 & 4 & 4 & C. P. 31 5 5– 5 || 140 || 35%| 3 12 ( & & & & & & & J. O. 25 13 5– 5; 225 40 3# 25 { { { { & & 4 & G. Z. 42 21 5– 9 175 37 2 20 & & { { & 4 K. R. 33 19 5– 6# 152 | 36 2} 15 ( & ( & ( & & & M. L. 41 7 5– 9 165 35 2} 20 & & (, i. { { { { J. D. 17 2 5— 3 105 30 1% 5 & & { % $ (, { { 39 Persons employed in Mr. J. CHR. HüPFEL's Brewery, examined by Dr. GUIDO KATZENMAYER. # g g ge ‘s rº 5 ;: §: § QX * ...; ###| # | # | ##| ###| ##| #3 || 3 || 3 g | 3 ### †† # i #| ###|###| ##| #5 | ##| | #g | SPECIAL Nº. 3 # Age: Eğ #| | # |#T | ###|###| # # # É º: #53 Él 3 ##| #3 ###| | #: #3 #: g= | REMARKS. H & º § 9 Q) CD - Q} #E §:5 | # 2.É. Q) O O O C 3° à # B | #5 a šā § 5 § Ö O O O º O º 3 #3 661 G. M. 41 25 5–5; 187 37+ 2 15 G00d G00d. G00d. | 600d. 662 Ph. H. 30 4 5— 5%. 135 | 32}| 3 10 (, i. { % { { ( (. 663 F. B. 36 2} 5– 6% 152 || 34 2 15 § { ( & { { ( { 664 W. K. 30 || 7 || 5–10 || 283 || 46 || 3 | 40 || “ “ “ “ 665 | F. K. 39 20 5–9, 194 | 37 || 4 || 35 | “ “ “ “ G66 L. W. 29 15 5– 8 || 157 || 34 || 3 || 40 || “ ‘‘ “ | ** (367 P. L. 30 9 5– 7% 219 39 5 30 $ $ { % { % § { 668 B. Sch. 38 || 23 5–5; 155 || 35}| 34 || 25 || “ “ “ “ 669 || A. E. 29 || 15 5–10 | 200 37 || 4 35 ( & { { ( & { { (370 : K. H. 28 4} | 5– 8 || 165 36 3 20 § { { { § { * { 671 J. M. 34 20 5–9 175 384 34 50 “ “ “ “ 672 J. St. 26 || 6 || 5– 5 151 || 35 | 24 20 || “ “ “ | “ 673 D. B. 19 || 3 || 5– 8 || 158 34 || 3 || 20 | “ “ “ “ 674 || F. T. 25 7 5– 5 || 148 || 35 2} 40 { { § { § { $ (, 675 J. B. 33 || 2 || 5–7, 163 || 38 || 4 || 35 | “ “ “ “ 676 A. U. 41 || 7 || 5–34 155 36 || 2 | 15 || “ “ “ “ 677 || M. M. 35 | 13 5– 8 || 170 || 36 || 3 || 25 ( t ) { { } { { 678 G. G. 43 || 6 || 5– 9 168 || 36|| 2 | 20 | “ { { } { { } { { 679 || W. Sp. 30 2} 5– 7 | 160 | 34 3} 30 { { { { * { (, , 680 | F. M. 19 || 5 || 5–9 | 165 || 34 || 1 || 15 “ “ “ “ 681 W. A. 25 8 5– (5 145 34 2 20 § { { { { { { { 682 | V. N. 23 || 5 || 5– 74| 164 || 36 || 3 || 25 | “ “ “ “ 683 || S. M. 47 20 5– 94| 171 || 36 3 20 { { “ Precarious: “ |Had acute Con- 684 || C. E. | 44 1 || 5– 6%| 154 || 35 2} 15 { { § { 600d. { % ºº:: º: 685| F. L. 27 | 5 || 5–9 || 170 35|| 3 | 20 || “ “ “ “ . .º. 686 || R. R. 34 18 5–11}| 172 || 36 4 25 ( & $ (, { { { { minuria. 687 J. W. 32 10 5– 3# 153 || 36 3 20 { { § { § { § { 688 J. G. 42 8 5- 9%| 225 || 41 2 20 { { { { { % { % 689 A. D. 56 40 5– 4 179 38 2 15 { { { % § { * { (390 |M. Sch. 27 10 5– 5 | 162 || 35 2} 30 { { § { { { $ (, 691 W. B 24 7 5– 8 180 36 2} 15 { { { { * { { { Persons employed in Messrs. J. KRESS Brewing Co., examined by Dr. GUIDO KATZENMAYER. (392 || H. G. 47 || 30 || 5–10 219 || 41 3 10 G00d. G00d 600d. ū00d 693 F. F. 26 || 11 || 5–11 || 294 || 45 4 30 $ tº { { { % $ $ (394 | U. R. 45 26 || 5– 7#| 267 || 45 2% 20 C. § ( 0. $ & (, , 695 || A. B. 34 18 5– 3 | 160 37 1% 25 & A (d. § { i (; 696 G. A. | 37 || 17 5–10 || 211 | 40 2% 15 ( 4. & \ $ $ (, 697 W. R. 57 5 5– 6 || 159 || 35 | 2 10 ( \, { % $ 8 & © 698 F. M. 25 5 5– 6 || 170 || 37 || 4 15 ū (, 6 t $ tº “ 699 || G. L. 28 13 5– 7 | 188 || 39 || 3 30 0 & $ $ & & 4 is 700 J. B. 32 2 {D– 6 162 37 4. 20 $ $ § { & g * & 701 || G. C. § 35 16 5– 9 206 J 37 2% 15 { ( & & 6 & & 702 J. B. | 33 6 5– 8% 213 41 t 15 { { & 4 & 4 6 * 40 Persons employed in Messrs. J. KRESS Brewing Co., examined by Dr GUIDO KATZENMAYER.—(Continued.) o #: *H F. . ] = + § & ăsă | f | 3 | ##| Hää |33; s | < | < | * ‘s a Tº .* *-s QB .# ~ 3.3 #: >, < d O * * O ### § # i |##|###|#3% (# is #| #g special No. 3 #5 |Age: i: | #| | # |#T | ###|###| # # # # #&# É #! # # § | ###| | # #| #: #H | #: | #H | REMARKS. H ſº 5.5 : Q) 53 | F $3.5 # 3-5. q) O O O O äää É B | 35 a £3 | # 5 § Ö O O O H 5 39 g = ### C ºf *—s &= ti- ‘s nº #5; É | # | ##|...};3 || 2:#| #4 3 | 2 | * - ### † #3 i É|##|#’sº | # 35 | ##| | # SPECIAL No. 3 #2 Age. 2 & 3 | #7 | # 3" | ###| || 5 = 3 | Eğ | 3: | # £3. #&# ### # .80 # ### § Šh 5: EH 33 g= REMARKS. H 5: ###| Tà || 3 | ##|###|###| #5 || 5 || 3 || 8 | H #3 5 || 3 | | ##g 745 H. Sch. 34 || 17 | 5– 3 | 155 || 36 || 4 25 G000 G00d G00d. G00d. 746 J. H. 27 5 5– 6 || 170 || 34 || 3 20 { % ( * • “ 747 J. W. 40 || 24 5– 7#| 170 38 2+ 25 { { | " ( { $ $ { { 748 || J. B. 30 6 5– 8% 200 | 40 4 20 { % { % § { * { 749 || J. B. 39 74 5– 6 180 || 38 3 30 { { { { { { { { 750 O. O. 35 9 5– 6+ 158 36 3} 20 ( & ‘. . ( (. { % 751 Ch. Gl. 3 6 5– 54; 155 34 24 20 Ç { { { % { 752 || W. St. 38 15 5– 84, 159 || 36 24 30 § ( ; { { { % 753 || A. Sch. 30 15 5– 6 | 160 | 35 | 3 40 { { { { { % { { 754 || A. K. 34 # 5– 9 || 169 || 37 24 20 { { { { { % (, i. 755 J. N. 30 7 5– 5+| 185 || 39 2+ 20 & 8 { { { { { % 756 A. K. 34 15 || 6– 3}| 289 || 41 || 4 30 & { % { { { % 757 FZ. M. 35 | 20 5– 3 || 170 38 2 20 & (, § { { { { { 758 || K. G. 27 9 5– 5 157 || 35 || 4 30 & 6 { { ( (. { { 759 | F. H. 41 || 13 5– 3+| 215 39 3 30 { { { { ( & { { 760 | A. R. 50 | 103 || 5– 7 | 163 || 37 || 3 25 & { % { % { % 761 Ch. E. 39 12 || 5– 84 180 || 42 24 30 ( ; { { { { { % 762 | B. N. 42 5 5– 5 #| 170 40 || 3 20 & 4 ( (. { { { % 763 |Chs. H. 42 6 || 5– 9 176 || 37 24 30 { { { { { % { % 764 H. N. 3 19 5– 5 || 158 36% 2} 20 § { { % & & { { 765 A. St. 31 13 5– 6: 175 38 3 20 * { & & & 4 ( c. 766 | D. M. 32 6 5– 8 168 || 35 | 2 25 { { ( & & & & & 767 | E. S.Ch. 50 9 || 5– 6; 175 38 24 25 { { 6 (; ( & & & Persons employed in Mr. JACOB HoFFMANN’s Brewery, examined by Dr. GUIDO KATZENMAYER. 768 Hy. H. 22 || 6 || 5–7 | 180 || 36 || 3 15 600d. G00d. | Good. | 600d. 769 || A. B. 30 7 || 5– 8 188 || 38 || 24 25 ( & ( & { { & C 770 J. R. 34 5 || 5– 7 | 168 || 35 | 34 8 * { { { t ( { { 771 || R. M. 45 27 | 5- 7 || 175 35 | 3 30 ( & & & ( & { % 772 J. M. 42 | 12 6– 205 || 39 3 40 { { \ { { { § { 773 || F. Sch. 28 5 5–113, 198 || 36 5 20 { % * { ( & { { 774 | D. L. 30 | 15 5– 5 | 160 35 | 2 60 { % & 4 { { { % 775 | H. L. 34 || 17 | 5– 7 || 190 || 39 || 44 40 $ 6 * & { % { { 776 Th. D. 43 10 || 5– 9 200 || 36 4 15 ( & ( & ( : { { 777 || J. V. 46 14 || 5– 9 || 230 || 37 || 4 20 { { 4 & 6 (; { { 778 || P. O. 37 8 || 5– 7 || 154 || 35 | 24 15 ( & & g & g { { 779 A. W. 46 8 || 5– 6%| 183 || 37 3 35 & & & & { { { { 780 G. H. 43 6 5–10 || 170 35 | 3 20 { { & © { { { { 781 Ch. W. 25 5 || 5–11 | 183 || 38 2+ 15 ( : & & & & { { 782 H. G. 44 || 11 5– 9 || 175 | 35 | 24 10 Precarious Precarious ‘‘ ‘‘ Suffered from 783 | F. S. 40 | 20 5–5 | 160 | 35+ 2} 40 | 600d. G00d. { { { { Icterus i: 784 || F. R. 37 4 || 5– 7 | 168 || 35 | 3 30 { { & & * { tº $ * 785 W. Sch.| 50 5 5– 8+| 184 || 39 4 15 { { 6 ( { { { { 786 J. R. 24 4 || 5– 5%| 158 || 34}| 3 20 & 6 & 6 { { { { 42 Persons employed in Mr. JACOB HoFFMANN’s Brewery, examined by Dr. GUIDO KATZENMAYER—(Continued.) # ſº É ad ad 's ad =# 5 Śā § Q} &–4 's &- *: rº; £º || 3 | # | 3: | E3 ºf #2; 5 * | * ### £g" | #3 i É| ###|###| ##| 35 | ##| ## special No. ###| |Age: 3; #T | #| |#T | ###| ### Eß # ##| | #3 #&# ###| #| | # 5; #3 gé # | #5 # ##| | REMARKS. - ſº #5 : # | # |##| ###| ###| #3 || 3 3 3 seg | * #5 "33 ###| * H | 3 ºf: 787 J. B. 38 10 || 5– 8 || 183 38 24 20 G00d G00d G00d 600d 788 W. St. 27 24 5– 94| 210 || 39 || 3 | 20 || “ “ | “ { % 789 Th. H. 32 5 5– 9 195 38 5 - 30 & 4 & & & & { { 790 A. H. 34 3 5– 7 || 150 || 33 2} 15 & & & & & & & & 791 || G. H. 26 || 10 5– 7 | 185 39 || 4 60 | “ . . . . . . & & 792 J. H. 44 28 5–10 || 170 38 24 50 | “ “ “ “ 793 J. S. 33 || 9 || 5– 5 | 165 | 34 24 | 15 “ “ “ “ 794 M. K. 37 4 5– 5 145 34 1} 15 ū & & 4 & & & & 795 | E. K. 30 13 5–10 170 34% 3} 20 ( & & & & 8 & 4 796 || K. M. 37 | 15 5– 6 152 | 35 | 2 || 30 ‘‘ “ | ** | “ 797 J. W. 27 | 10 || 5– 1 || 130 || 34 24 || 25 “ & & | & & § { 798 || K. B. 43 # 5– 9 || 165 38 || 3 12 “ . . . . . . . . . 799 || L. K. 25 | 11 5–10 172 || 37 || 3 20 & 4 ( & { { & & 800 A. J. 18 2nn. 5–10 | 165 || 34 2} 15 { { & & & 4 { { 801 | P. K. 34 || 10 5– 8 || 162 35 | 2+ 50 { { & & & ( & 802 || J. Sch. 44 13 5– 6 || 175 37 || 3 15 & & & { & & & & 803 || Ph. G. 23 l 5 5– 7 || 190 36 || 2% 15 ( & & & { { & © Persons employed in FINK & SoN’s Brewery, examined by Dr. H. F. KUDLICH. 804 || A. M. 51 || 31 5– 54; 187 39%| 2 20 G00d. | Normal, | Normal, | Normal. 805 || W. Z. 21}| 4 || 5–4 162 33 || 1: 20 { % § { & 4 “ Gained over 30 806 || W. H. 46 || 30 5-- 5}| 186 374 3 25 { % { { & & a & ; bºok: 807 |_J. R. 29 || 6 || 5–6; 207 || 39 24 || 25 “ “ “ “ ingin brewery. 808 J. G. L. 29 || 15 5–113, 184 || 37 || 2 || 25 | “ ſ & & £ 4 & 809 || A. E. 32 || 8 || 5– 94 184 || 36|| 2 | 15 “ “ “ “ 810 || A. J. 43 || 6 || 5–8; 168 || 354|| 2 | 20 | “ “ “ “ 811 T. B. 41 || 10 5– 8 150 || 33}| 1 | 15 “ ‘‘ “ 4. 812 O. S. 39 20 5–8 187 || 38 2} 30 $ (, & & $ & & & 813 J. D. 32 53 5– 6+ 172 | 35+| 3 || 35 | “ “ “ “ 814 || A. K. 24 || 10 || 5–10 | 165 || 36|| 3+ 25 “ “ “ $ (, 815 J. M. 30 | 16 || 5– 6+| 166 37 || 23 25 || “ ‘‘ “ { { 816 J. L. 23 7 5– 3} 133 32% 2# 15 § { & & • { tº & 817 | H. W. 24 5} | 5– 6 162 38}| 1 25 Not good. Good. Good. 600d. Siſters from 818 L. Z. 39 21 5– 9 | 164 || 37 || 3 30 | 600d. £ & { { { { emphysema. 819 || W. A. 26 || 15 5–7, 185 35 | 24 || 15 “ “ “ “ 820 O. R. 32 15 5– 6 161 35% 2% 20 { { & { { { & & ----- - - ---------- - - * * *-*-* * *-* * 43 Persons employed in BURR, SoN & Co.'s Brewery, examined by Dr. H. F. KUDLICH. ad *—t 8 . ; ; ; – 3 2 : e - O = .9 - || 3 + š, - - == 3 3 || 3 3 | E3 s & 3 à || 8 — - Q- 's 23 ###| #| | |##| ###|###| #4 . . . . g . . 2 5.5 sº. É | | | ##| ###| E3 ºf 5 § 3 à | 35 | SPECIAL No. # Age ºf #7 | # |#|| ###|###| # | # ÉÉ # #&# #| # # || #3 ||3: # #5 # ##| REMARKs, H' ſº #F : © Gl) 5 § × 3rd 395.5 QX C Sº Sº Sº & ſº 35 # | P: £5 a ##| #5; § O O O H º O 5 3 || $2 = 5 Prº 3 * ſº | 821 | W. M. 42 15 5— 8, 185 | 39 3 20 (00d. 600d. G00d. G000. Never been sick. 822 || J. B. 45 30 5–7%. 190 37 2 20 { { Normal. | Normal. Normal 823 A. B. 36 | 19 || 5–10 || 238 || 44 || 3 15 Robust. ‘‘ { { ** ||Never been Sick. 824 || K. W. 30 | 12 || 5– 9 212 || 38 2 20 G00d. { { { { { { 825 | L. K. 25 | 10 || 5– 5}| 192 || 38 || 24 25 { { { { { { { { 826 L. M. 27 8 5– 6:#| 174 34%| 1} 10 { { { { & [. { { 827 | A. Z. 30 14 5– 8} 198 || 38 2 20 { { { { { { { { 828 G. M. 36 || 23 5– 8 || 195 || 38 24 25 { { { { { { { { 829 G. W. 18}| 1 || 5– 6 || 140 34}| 3 10 { { ( { ( & { { 830 | H. O. 42 22 || 5– 8 || 247 || 46 | 1 20 “ |Enlarged. Good. | Good. Rheumatism. 831 | A. B. 38 7 5–64 185 38%| 13 15 * { G00d. * { { { 832 A. K. 31 | 18 5– 94| 186 37 24 25 { { { { ( & { { 833 J. S. 32 17 5– 6 166 38 2} 15 ( (. { { { { { { 834 H. H. 31 || 15. 5– 8; 160 || 33+| 3 20 § { { { ( & { { 835 | J. W. 32 || 06 || 5–7, 185 || 36|| 2 15 { { { { { { { { 836 E. F. 63 || 38 || 5– 5 | 161 || 37 14 20 & & { { { { { { 837 G. W. 56 || 32 || 5–84; 250 54 2 30 || Robust. “ { { ‘‘ Never been Sick. 838 A. S. 27 9 5– 9 172 34 3# 15 & & { { { % { { 839 || T. M. 47 20 5–8; 172 || 37 2 20 G00d. | Normal. | Normal. | Normal. 840 || K. K. 38 20 5–4 || 212 || 41 || 2 25 | Robust. || “ * { ! { ||Never been F: cl: 841 A. W. 27 1} | 5– 8 || 170 || 33 || 3 15 600d. { { { { { { 842 || C. K. 45 25 5–64 180 || 36 || 13 15 Weak. { { { { “ |Suf’rs frequent- 843 | F. K. 28 14 5– 94 180 37 2} 20 600d. { { { { { % º BrOn- 844 | L. O. 16 4 5– 6 143 || 33 2 5 { % § { § { { { - 845| A. W. 54 28 5– 8 || 185 38}| 2} 15 { { { { { { { { 846 M. M. 26 5 5– 7 153 35% 14 25 { { { { § { { '847 | E. M. 28 || 10 || 5– 7#| 174 || 36; 24 15 { { { { § { { { 848 ||P. McC 48 || 15 5– 8 || 185 37}| 2} 10 { % { { § { { { 849 || J. S. 54 20 5– 6 || 145 || 34 1% ... Not good. “ { % Diseased. Suffers from } Rheumatism. Persons employed in BEADLESTON & WoFRz’ Brewery, examined by Dr. H. F. KUDLICH. 850 | F. R. 36 84 || 5– 8%| 146 37 | 1.4 10 600d. | Normal. | Normal. | Normal. 851 F. T. 45 16 || 5– 7 || 173 39 || 2 8 Not good. “ § { Diseased.|Suf’rs frequent- 852 J. L. 38 || 9 || 5–9 212 | 40 || 2 | 20 | Good. “ * | Normal. ºne" 853 E. R. 28 13 5– 7#| 165 || 36|}| 2} 10 || Robust. ‘‘ { { { % - 854 | H. G. 34 5 5– 5 || 149 || 35' 2 12 G00d. { { { { * { 855 || C. M. 40 8 5– 7#| 190 38+ 2} 14 { { § { § { { { 856 | P. B. 19 7 || 5– 8 || 159 || 36 2 15 { { { { { { { { 857 | O. D. 33 || 13 | 6– 229 || 41+ 2} 15 Very good. “ { % ** ||Never been sick. 858 || W. N. 24 6 5–11 | 181 || 33 3 25 600d. ( { * { { % 859 | H. G. 34 6 5– 7#| 176 38 2 20 { % { { { % { % 860 J. K. 25 6 5–11 244 42 2} 20 | Robust. “ • { ** Nover been sick. 861 | M. E. 34 2 || 5– 7#| 173 || 38+ 2 15 600d. { {. { % { { 862 J. S. 32 4 5– 5}| 160 35 1+ 20 { % { { { { { { 44 Persons employed in BEADLESTON & WoFRz' Brewery, examined by Dr. H. F. KUDLICH.-(Continued.) o g; * . 5 : 5:= § *— rº # =#| 3 || 3 | ##| =#| ##| 3 || || 3 || s s ### £g" | #3 fi ##| 3:# 5.3 ## #g # #3 special No. # Age.|3}} | ##| | | ##| ###|###| # | # | # | # ## |*|###| | | # #| | ###| ##| # # # # REMARKs. E*% ###| *; § ##| #3; ###| #5 | ET | #4 3 &H # # | * |#5 ###| ###| Š O O O & O £r. < *gº - 863 | H. H. 37 2 5–6; 165 || 37}| 2 10 GOOd. | Normal. | Normal. | Normal. 864 A. H. 38 5% 5– 9 168 38 3 20 { { { { & & & & 865 | L. O. 48 9 || 5– 8 || 182 || 36 2 15 { { ( { 6 * & & 866 || O. G. 31 24 5– 8%. 169 34 2% 20 { { { { { % { { 867 A. N. 30 12 5– 73 184 37% 2} 15 { % § { & & & & 868 J. S. 48 || 12 || 5–4 || 136 32 13 I8 Weak. { { ( & “ Suffers frºm chr. 869 J. J. 29 || 10 || 5– 8%| 213 || 38+ 2 25 | Robust. “ { { ( & Bronchitis, 870 J. C. 37 3 5– 8+| 178 || 35+ 2} 20 600d. § { * { { 871 H. S. 26 2 5–9%| 200 || 38 3 20 | Robust. ‘‘ § { & & 872 F. E. 29 || 10m 5–4 137 || 32}| 3 15 G00d. { { § { $ & 873 H. K. 25 9 “ 5– 7% 175 36 3 10 ( (. ( { & & & & 874 J. A. 30 2} | 5– 7% 169 || 34 3# 15 { { { { 4 & & & 875 Z. S. 43 44 || 5– 8 || 204 | 40 2 20 “ |Enlarged. “ { { 876 W. S. 27 1 || 5– 5 | 150 33}| 2 18 ( { Normal. ‘‘ g & 877 | P. B. 21 2 5–8; 176 || 36 2+ 10 { % (, . * { (, t 878 || M. F. 38 7 5– 9 || 190 || 37 2} 10 { % { { * { { { 879 K. P. 27 4 5– 9%. 158 || 33+ 2 15 { { { { * { & & 880 | F. M. 36 || 5 || 5– 74. 163 || 35}| 2} | 10 || “ { { ( & * { * 881 | S. W. 61 24 6– 185 36 2+ 24 § { { { & & “ ||Never been sick. 882 P. K. 29 5 || 5– 7 || 214 || 38+ 2} 15 || Robust. “ & 4 “ Never been sick. 883 || F. F. 43 7+ | 5– 6 || 174 || 36 || 14 25 G00d. ( { { { { { 884 || J. S. 34 8 5–10 | 200 38 2 24 { % { { & & & & 885 | E. H. 33 6% 5– 6 || 135 | 32 3 6 t (, { { * & ( & 886 M. F. 26 || 4 || 5–10 | 200 || 38 || 2:# 15 Robust. “ & 4 ( (. SS7 || J. S. 50 15 6– 2 | 187 37 # 12 ( (. { % & & ** Never been Sick. 888 P. S. 39 16 || 5– 8 || 175 || 36 || 1:# 10 G00d. { { ( : & & 889 || Z. B. 28 || 14 || 5– 7 || 195 || 38 || 2 10 { % { { & & & & 890 S. L. 49 || 10 || 5–4}| 154 || 33+ 1} 12 { { { & & & & 891 G. W. 37 8 5– 5 175 35 2} 20 ( { { { & & & & 892 || C. D. 27 9In 5– 6 160 35 1% 18 { { { % & ! & & 893 W. L. 31 5% 5– 8 || 165 35}| 1} 15 { { { % (, i. & 894 | D. C. 35 7 5– 8 || 165 35 14 18 { { { { { { & & 895 J. S. 45 8 5– 9% 178 38 2 7 Q & & C C & & C 896 || H. F. 30 | 101 n| 5–11 | 200 || 38 || 3 16 || Robust. “ & & & 4 897|F. H. K. 25 10In| 5– 9 || 172 36 1#. 10 600d. ( & { % & ſº 898 || K. S. 23 || 6 || 5–10}| 207 || 36|| 24 || 20 || Robust. “ { { & & 899 P. D. 26 1 5– 7 157 32 2} 15 G00d. { { ( & § { 900 G. S. 32 9In 5– 9 || 178 || 38 2} 16 { % { { & & & C 901 | N. B. 35 | 10 || 5–10 | 187 || 37 || 2 15 ( & ( . ( & { { 902 B. M. 36 4% 5— 5 182 35% 2 10 { % $ (, & & tº { 903 |H. F. K. 42 5 5– 9 220 | 40 2; 15 || Robust. “ ( & t { 904 || O. D. 20 8 || 5– 7 | 161 33 2 20 G00d. { % & & { { 905 B. H. 37 25 5– 6# 183 37% 1} 30 { { { % Y. { % ( & 906 || E. T. 32 9 5– 8%| 175 38 2 40 { % { { & & § { 907 A. O. 27 9 5– 54 141 32 1; 25 { { { % & £ ( & 908 |P. L. 29 2} 6– 207 393 2} 30 Robust. C 9. & i & & 909 G. V. D. 38 12 5–10}| 190 384] 2 10 G00d. { % & a & & 910 || M. H. 23 5 || 5– 9 || 196 || 39 || 3 20 | Robust. “ & C ( & 911 | H. B. 39 || 13 5–64 170 || 37}| 2 15 G00d. { % & J. { { 912 || J. B. 24 || 5 || 5– 6 || 204 || 38%l 2+ | 15 || “ { % C & & 45 Persons employed in BEADLESTON & WoRRz' Brewery, examined by - Dr. H. F. KUDLICH (Continued.) Hail Balašālā; a | * | * 3 & # ÉÉ | # | # ##| E3 | ##| #5 || 3 || || 2 || 3 ### † | ##| i |##| #|##| # 35 | ##| ##| special No. ###| | Age. 2.É #7 | # £T | ###| 5 ; ; Eğ # #5 := 3 # 5 3 ###| #| | # | ##| 3:3 || 3 #| #5 | #5 | #3 | # | REMARKs. ãº: =9: § 3 § ##| ###| | ###| #'s 5 5% & #| # | 3 |##| ###| ###| 3 || 5 || 5 | & ſº • | # * | * #3 913 | L. S. 36 15 5–10 | 204 || 40+ 2} 30 || Robnst. | Normal. Normal. | Normal, 914 || C. R. 25 11 5– 4 | 165 35 2% 12 Very good. “ & & $ t 915 | E. W. 35 | 17 | 5– 7 || 175 36 2 30 G00d. 4 & * { * { 916 | E. L. 26 1 5– 9 || 178 394 2 25 § { ( & & & & & 917 | E. B. 20 4 5– 7 | 158 34}| 1% 20 { { & & ( & & & 918 J. K. 28 || 12 || 6– 209 || 38+| 2+ 25 { { $ & * { { { 919 || A. R. 38 4 || 5– 7 || 174 || 36 2 25 { { & & ( & $ 4 920 K. S. 26 8 5– 6# 280 33 2 - 25 { { & & 4 & ( & 921 | A. H. 32 || 17 | 5– 6: 178 || 35 | 24 75 { % & 8 & & & & 922 || K. S. 35 | 20 5– 5; 209 || 39%| 2 25 { { ( & { { & & 923 || A. H. 27 8 5–5 || 148 || 32}| 1+ 15 { { & & & & § { 924 J. B. 24 || 10 || 5– 7 | 180 36 2 25 ( & & & & & { { 925 J. T. 36 22 5– 9 195 || 38+ 2 10 { { { { & & & & 926 A. H. 25 || 14 5–9 || 209 || 37#| 2 30 Robust. ‘‘ & & & 8 927 . G. A. | 24 3 || 5–8; 185 37 2 20 G00d. tº & 6 & & 928 C. S. 37 12 5– 8 || 209 40% 2 10 Not good. { { & & Diseased. Suffers from 929 H. S. 37 5 5–9 172 || 37 2} 20 | 600d. § { { { Normal. Rheumatism. 930 J. M. 44 24 || 5–11 || 209 || 39 2 25 Not good. Enlarged. “ & & 931 G. R. 37 9 5– 7#| 171 || 37 2 20 | GOOd. | Normal. ‘‘ & & Persons employed in S. ----------------- | # W.S ; i º LIEBMANN SONS' Brewery, examined by Dr. Hrgo 57 Montrose Ave., Brooklyn, E. D. KoKTHE, 5} | 67% 15 63 9 67 54 63 11 69 15 66 3 65 6 68 4 67 22 72 12 (58 8 71 12 69 8 66 2 71 6 70 4 674 20 68 2 68 10 66 12 64 23 66 11 65 182 152 156 138 195 151 150 161 164 190 185 196 157 164 184 190 160 189 178 152 135 148 154 39–413 37–39; 34–36 35–37} 41–43% }|34}35} 32–34 #|364–39 36–384 39–41 37–38; 38–40 35–37; 34–36 35–37; 36–38% 34–35; 39–40} 37–39% 34–36% 35–36% 34–36% 33–35 20 G00d. Normal. * { & S. & & & 6 • { & 6 § { & & 4 & ( & & 4 { { Normal. * { & & 4 & & & & & ( & Normal. & e & 4 & & & & * { & & & $ { { 46 Persons employed in S. LIEBMANN SoNs’ Brewery, examined by Dr. Hugo KoKTHE, Brooklyn, E. D.—(Continued.) e $4–8 º # = 3 e #=#| || 3 |##| =#|##| = |* | * | * &- Ca .2-, -º Q) © <2 .R. • * # =S * < CD ### £g" | # i |##| # #| # is .35 | # special No. 3 ## Age. §§ | T | # |&T | ###| || 5 = 3 | # ## ##| | #3 #&# ###| # # #| #3 ||3:#| #: #3 | # ##| | REMARKS. H & º E : .80 QX 53 F 3-5 ; º, ; Q) O 3 3 3 ###| 3 | = |##| agā ###| 3 ſº O R