STATEMENT OF FACTS, RELATIVE TO THE APPOINTMENT OF THE AUTHOR TO THE OFFICE OF PROFESSOR OF CHEMISTRY, IN MIDDLEBURY COLLEGE, AND THE TERMINATION OF HIS CONNEXION WITH THAT COLLEGE. $19.5.10 BY GAMALIEL S. OLDS, A. M. 20.03.15 GREENFIELD: PRINTED BY DENIO AND PHELPS. 60 Roou 2288 ASSOCIATION OF MINISTERS, COUNTY OF FRANKLIN, MASSACHUSETTS. “ At a meeting of the FRANKLIN ASSOCIATION, at Conway, 13th of May, 1818 ; the following question was proposed by the Rev. Gamaliel s. Olds: Is it proper and necessary for me, under existing circumstances, to publish the facts relative to my appointment to the office of Professor of Chemistry in Middlebury College, and the termina- tion of my connexion with that College ? To this question the following answer was given, viz: A vague report, that the Rev. Mr. Olds is of an overbearing character and disposition, appears to have been put in circulation. This seems to have arisen from his intercourse with President Davis and the Corporation of Middlebury College, in relation to his office in that institution. This unfavorable report is directly contrary to any traits of his character, or steps of his conduct, either as a man, an officer in Williams' College, or a minister of the gospel, which have come to our knowledge. Written and sufficient evidence is before us, that he has, months ago, proposed to submit the whole matter of difference between him, and President Davis and the Corporation of Middlebury Col- lege, to disinterested men of christian character; and that they have not complied with the proposal. It is, therefore, the deliberate opinion of this Association, with- out at all undertaking to decide the merits of the cause, that the Rev. Mr. Olds, having the requisite documents in his hand, not only may with propriety, but, on christian principles, really ought to publish the undisguised facts in the case. A true copy from the record-Attest, MOSES MILLER, Scribe." STATEMENT OF FACTS. sen- IT is very generally known, that the writer was appointed Professor of Chemistry in Middlebury College, that he spent con- siderable time at New-Haven to prepare himself for the office, and, notwithstanding, that he did not eventually go to Middlebury. It has undoubtedly appeared to many, that an explanation of the case was demanded by a decent respect for public opinion. But in his own view, the writer could not give a fair statement of the case, without disclosing the faults of others; and he did not think himself at liberty to do this, merely because it was consistent with justice. He felt himself, therefore, under obligation to decline, unless it should appear to be a necessary duty. It has been the ardent desire of the writer to bring the matter to an equitable termination, by a mode, evidently prescribed in the word of God, for professed Christians. For this purpose, he wrote to President Davis, requesting to submit the whole case to disin- terested men of christian character. It appears, that the Dr. did not answer the letter, till he had resigned the presidency at Mid- dlebury College. He then replied, that the writer must be “ sible that he had no longer any connexion with Middlebury Col- lege,” that he had acted as the agent' of the Corporation," and that “the subject lay between the writer and then." In this man- ner he declined. He stated, however, particularly, that “ he had lately seen the Board together," and that “the letter was present- ed to them.” But the Board, so far as appears, were not disposed to comply with the request. Nor does there appear to be any prospect, according to information since received, that either Dr. Davis, or the Corporation of Middlebury College, will consent to this fair and amicable method of adjusting the business. The writer can appeal to those, with whom he has had inter- course, to evince the circumspection with which he has treated the subject. Though he could not avoid feeling himself greatly in- jured, he was disposed to pass the matter, by mentioning some general truth only, which implied no imputation either upon Dr. Davis or the Corporation. And he would have considered it his invariable duty to let the subject pass in this manner, from respect for the institution and the gentlemen concerned, if the professed friends of that institution had not themselves, by propagating mis- representations of the case, compelled him to correct them. The writer has abundant evidence, that not only misrepresenta- tions of the case, but very unjustifiable imputations upon his char- acter have been put into circulation. It appears that respectable friends of the College have been so intent upon their object, that even the particular friends of the writer, when they go into the vicinity of Middlebury, are liable to be attacked upon his account. If the writer has not been misinformed, they seem to be disposed 4 to verify the axion, that great and good men, when they fall inte error, seldom know where to stop. They have labored, according to the best information which has been received, to impress the public mind with an idea, that the writer was, in some way, bad enough to justify them in excluding him from his office, without so much as the form of a trial. Under these circumstances, the writer has been reduced to the alternative, either to suffer the friends of Middlebury College, through all their numerous points of contact with the public, to fasten unfounded imputations upon him, or to attempt the refuta- tion of them by a correct statement of the facts. He has not been precipitate. He has not been disposed to adopt the latter part of the alternative but with great reluctance. He has waited till all reasonable prospect of procuring a mutual reference, which he would much prefer, has entirely disappeared. He has taken the advice not only of judicious christians, but of a highly respectable association of ministers, in this vicinity. He trusts that he has sincerely asked counsel of God. He has at length come to a satis- factory conclusion, that it is his duty to appeal to the public. So great indeed has been his regret, that he could not give a fair statement of the case, without mentioning facts, which may imply that others are not free from blame, that he has suspended any publication upon the subject, till it has appeared, not only to him- self, but to wise and disinterested men, to be demanded of him as an imperious duty. He would gladly excuse himself still from the unwelcome duty, if he could persuade himself, that he ought to suffer imputations, calculated to injure his future usefulness, to be fixed upon him, by suggestions and misrepresentations addressed to the imagination and the passions; when, in his own opinion at least, he possesses the means of removing them in the original cor- respondence and documents. It is the single object of the writer to vindicate himself, by a correct statement of the facts in the case, from unjust imputations. If he knows his own heart, he has no malevolent feeling towards those who have injured him. If they have placed themselves in a situation, which renders it impracticable to attain justice for the injured, without stating facts, which they would wish to conceal ; he hopes that they will have the magnanimity to forgive him, and do him the justice to believe, that he as sincerely regrets the occa- sion and the necessity as they possibly can. But he cannot per- suade himself that the candid public will think, that he ought to endure in silence not only considerable injury in his property, but also in his reputation, till he shall incur from those, who have in- jured him, the additional imputation, that he has no defence to of- fer. The appointment of the writer to the office of Professor of Chemistry, in Middlebury College, was made at the Commence- ment, in August, A. D. 1816. In the succeeding vacation, Dr. Da- vis, then the President of the College, visited him in this place. He stated to the Dr. that, though he had formerly paid some at- tention to Chemistry, he should not consider himself qualified to instruct, and deliver lectures, in that branch of science, without a particular preparation for that purpose. The President, therefore, agreed, as he was understood, that the writer should have a rea- sonable time to prepare for the office, under the superintendence of Professor Silliman, at New-Haven; that his salary should com- mence from the date of his dismission from his people, to be paid quarterly; and that he should receive remittances of his salary, as it became due, to assist him in supporting himself and his family, during his absence. On the other hand, to secure the President and Corporation from any improper risque in the case, the writer agreed to refund of the salary, accruing to him before he should be ready to go to Middlebury, if he should resign, unless from ill health, within five years, in the following proportion, to wit, if he should resign within one year, to refund four fifths of that sum, whatever it might be, if within two years, three fifths of the same, and so on. As it was not expected that the writer, by accepting the ap- pointment, should give up the ministry, nor that a Council in this vicinity would be willing to dismiss him, if provision were not made for his continuance in it, the President likewise agreed, that he should have a right to be absent on Saturday and Monday to enable him to preach abroad, if he pleased, on the Sabbath At the same time, in order to give the writer the proper securi- ty in the business, the President undertook to procure the ratifica- tion of this arrangement by the Corporation in due form ; and this was to be done, if practicable, before the writer should move for a dismission from his people. He then proposed to the Dr. to re- duce the terms specifically to writing immediately; but the Dr. said, that it was wholly unnecessary, he understood them perfect- ly, and thus prevented it. The President, soon after his return to Middlebury, informed the writer: “A meeting of the Board of Trust was holden last evening. I stated the subject to them explicitly. Six of the members only were present, and as seven are necessary to a quo- rum, no resolutions could be past. This circumstance however makes no difference. The opinions of the members in this vicinity, respecting the pecuniary interests of the institution, uniformly prevail with the Board.” He added expressly, “ As the expense of instruction is for the benefit of the institution, they think it alto- gether reasonable that your salary should commence with the date of your dismission.” He manifestly wished the writer to proceed, as if it had been resolved upon by a unanimous vote of the Trustees.” As he passed through Berkshire County on his return, where the writer has many friends, he mentioned particularly as an inducement to accept the appointment; “Gentlemen in Wil- liamstown, connected with the College there, and all others in Berkshire County, who spoke of the subject, appeared to have no 66 6 doubt of your accepting it. Mr. Shepard* says, it is unquestiona- bly your duty to accept of it.” The writer was not insensible, that the opinion of the members present would not legally bind the Corporation. But from the President's representation, there did not appear to be any reason to doubt, that the arrangement would be ratified, as he had engag- ed it should be, the first opportunity. Nor would the circum- stances well have permitted the writer to wait, till a legal ratifica- tion could be obtained from Middlebury. Professor Silliman ex- pected shortly to commence his lectures, and it was necessary for the writer to decide immediately, in order to enter seasonably upon his preparation. A Council was, therefore, called, with the concurrence of the church and society. As the people, over whom the writer was settled, appeared to be determined to divide into two parishes, in consequence of a dispute about the location of a meeting-house, the Council took into consideration, on the one hand," the doubtful prospects which his society presented,” and on the other, the prospect of usefulness afforded by his appoint- ment, and decided that it was “expedient that the pastoral rela- tion be dissolved." This took place on the 31st of October, A. D. 1816. The writer signified to Dr. Davis, that he was at liberty to accept the appointment, and went to New-Haven in November following The writer, soon after his arrival at New-Haven, received a letter from Dr. Davis, in which he expressly stated in regard to the salary, "you may rest in the assurance, that the Board will ratify the commencement of your salary, from the time of your dismission, upon the conditions specified,” that is (as the writer understood the conditions) that the salary should be refunded, as has been mentioned, in case of resignation, and that he should have a reasonable time, on the other hand, to prepare for the office. But in relation to the writer's request, that provision might be made to send him remittances of his salary, the President said: “With regard to remittances from our treasury, I would just re- mark, that our treasury is at present entirely empty, and is likely to remain so, 1 apprehend, for some time. If you can possibly make your arrangements so, as to avoid calling on us until you shall come on, it would be to us a great accommodation. Such is the state of this country at present, that it is well nigh impossible to obtain money for any purpose." The writer truly was somewhat surprised at this representation. Before he accepted his appointment, the President had given him pretty flattering accounts of the resources of the College. It was but a short time, since he had engaged to send remittances to aid the writer in supporting himself and his family. But now he appeared disposed to plead off, on account of the scarcity of mo- ney, and the present poverty of their treasury. The writer, it * The Rev. Mr. Shepard of Lenox, a member of the Corpora- tion of Williams' College. 7 seemed, must be left to rely exclusively upon his own resources, at least for a considerable time, or abandon the object, for which he was engaged. But at the same time, he had the confidence to believe, that the President and Corporation would feel themselves bound, by the most delicate honor, to make good an advance of money upon such an urgent request. He was encouraged too by the President to expect, that their embarrassments would be temporary," and that the prospects of the institution were bright- ening.” He was likewise greatly interested in the prosperity of the institution, and felt anxious to accommodate them as much as possible. And though he did not think it expedient to relin- quish his claim for remittances, he succeeded so as to afford them the accommodation requested, and left his salary in their hands. Dr. Davis proposed to the writer, “if practicable," to come to Middlebury early in the spring. In the answer, the Dr. was in- formed, that Mr. Silliman considered it necessary that the writer should attend to mineralogy, and that this would require a longer time. Afterwards, in a letter dated the 4th of April, 1817, the President noticed that they had no particular occasion for instruc- tion in Chemistry. “As I have remarked to you before," he ob- served, “ little can be done in your professorship.” And it appear- ed from the account which he gave, that they did not calculate to make the professorship any object till the next year. But he mentioned that one of the Tutors was going away, and wished the writer to come to Middlebury“ by the last of the month.” There was, however, an intrinsic difficulty in the case. Mr. Silliman had already given his opinion to the writer decidedly, that he ought“ by all means” to attend to mineralogy. It appear- ed to that gentleman, that a competent knowledge of mineralogy was indispensable to the success of a Professor of Chemistry. But this it was impracticable for the writer to attain, unless he could spend a part of the summer at New-Haven. It was of primary importance for him to attend through Mr. Silliman's course of lectures upon that subject. But this was not all. Mr. Silliman could consistently afford the writer more personal assistance, and superior opportunities, in the Cabinet of minerals, during the latter, thar the former part of his course. Under these circum- stances, it was contemplated to write to the President immediate- ly, to ascertain whether there was any necessity of the writer's as- sistance, which would in any degree justify the relinquishment of so important an object. But, at this very time, Professor Hall ar- rived in New-Haven directly from Middlebury. He informed the writerin substance, that, though his assistance would be desirable, there was no necessity of it; they could get along well enough without him. The writer told Mr. Hall, that he thought then, that it would be altogether best for him to stay, and go through the course on mineralogy. As Mr. Hall would return to Middlebury in a few days, there appeared to be no reason to doubt, that the information, which he would give upon the subject, would be entirely satisfactory. Af- 8. ter an interview with a gentleman of Mr. Hall's standing in Mid- dlebury College, it could hardly have been expected that any dif- ficulty would arise, more than if the interview had been with the President himself. At the same time, as the President had spared no pains, in his early correspondence, to impress the mind of the writer strongly with the liberal views, with which they intended to introduce and establish the additional departments of science at that College, it could not be reasonably questioned, that they would wish him to prepare himself for the one assigned him, as well as circumstances would possibly permit. Nor could it be presumed, that the Dr. would think of insisting upon the writer's relinquishing his preparation, for an object foreign to his appoint- ment. It did not appear, neither, that there could be supposed to be any comparison, between some occasional assistance in other branches of instruction, and the due preparation of a Professor for the permanent duties of his office. Add to this, that no time for the writer to go to Middlebury had been agreed upon, for this par- ticular reason, that it could not be ascertained beforehand what time would be requisite for his preparation. Nor had he ever thought that a few weeks would be deemed material, if he found them necessary to his purpose. Under these circumstances, when he had occasion to stay to complete the very design for which he went to New-Haven, it could not be anticipated that the President would not cordially acquiesce. But to his surprise, the writer, on the 21st, received a letter dat- ed the 3d of May, 1817, not long after Mr. Hall's return to Mid- dlebury, in which the President appeared evidently to take the ground that the writer had forfeited his claim; said, he could not tell “ what the Corporation would do further than they had pledg- ed themselves, he had no authority to pledge them;" asserted, that " the fact was, that the writer "had already been absent much longer than was expected, and was pursuing an object (mineralo- gy) not necessarily connected with his professorship;" plainly assumed, that the writer had thus violated the condition, upon which" solely the Corporation had agreed that his salary should be paid him during his absence,” and “should he not come on immediately, it was doubtful whether the Corporation would be willing to allow him his salary for the whole time.” The general strain of the letter appeared to be bottomed upon the same ground, or intended to enforce the same idea. It was written too but three days after the time, to which the President had expressly consented that the writer might be absent. To the writer, this representation was as new as it was unac- countable and astonishing. He knew not what to make of it. But he could not possibly understand the meaning to be any thing less than this, that the Corporation were no longer pledged to him, that he had in fact forfeited his claim some time before, that it would be a matter of forbearance only, if they should take no ad- vantage of the past, but for the future he could not reasonably ex- pect any indulgence, for if he did not come on immediately, a part 9 of his salary would probably be taken from him for the neglect. This was the impression made upon the mind of the writer, and he could not see that the letter was susceptible of any other inter- pretation. The reader, it may be presumed, will be little less surprised than the writer at this extraordinary representation, when he un- derstands, that, according to the President's own letters, the facts were these; that the “ Corporation were willing that the writer should have a reasonable time to prepare for the services of the of- fice ;" that he knew that" Professor Silliman” (the gentleman, un- der whose superintendence it was agreed that the writer should place himself) " thought it important that the writer should attend to mineralogy,” that he himself, when first written to upon the subject," made no objection to the writer's attending to mineralo- gy,” and accordingly“ they were informed by Professor Hall, that the writer was attending to mineralogy;" that he did not pretend, that they wanted the writer to instruct in Chemistry (the business, to which he had been appointed); and that to “ hear a part of the recitations of the Senior Class during his absence” (for two or three weeks, as it has been said, in May or June) « and now and then a recitation in Mathematics was all that they expected” of the writer till the next year. Now, according to the President's own statement of the facts, when the Corporation did not wish to restrict the writer in his preparation to any thing short of a “reasonable time,” when they knew that he was attending to mineralogy upon the best authori- ty, when his attention to this subject would not interfere with the business of his professorship at Middlebury, and when the occa- sional assistance, which was wanted there, was manifestly so un- important, that to use Mr. Hall's words, they could get along well enough without him ;-how did it come to pass, that the President should undertake to make such a difficulty with him about attend- ing to mineralogy ? And this was the more unaccountable, because the President, in his letters to induce the writer to accept the ap- pointment, had taken so much pains to impress his mind with the idea, that “ the Board of Trust were a highly liberal and magnani- mous set of men,” and that “it was their determination to make the institution highly respectable, if practicable.” He must surely have been sensible, that, in consequence of this, the writer would feel a solicitude to qualify himself, if possible, in those things ne- cessary to his professorship, so as not to disappoint too much the expectation of such men, nor fall too far short of the design which they had in view. It was particularly contemplated in the agreement, that the en- gagement to pay the writer his salary, from the date of his dismis- sion from his people, should be ratified by the Corporation in due form, as the very basis, upon which he should go to Middlebury. The President had repeatedly promised that it should be done ; but the fact was, it had not been done. From circumstances, this fact appeared to be indubitable, at the time, when his extraordina-, 2 10 гу letter of the Sd of May was under consideration. It has since been reduced to a certainty by the records of the Board. It ap- pears that no resolution to that effect was ever passed upon the subject. The Board had retained in their hands, as a corporate body, the right to reject the whole arrangement, and refuse to pay the writer any thing upon the conditions stipulated. Notwith- standing what the President said in this letter about the Corpora- tion, it is now absolutely certain, that he meant nothing more than the informal consultation of some of the members, in the first in- stance, when he stated that there was not a quorum, and no reso- lutions could be past. Thus it appears, that the Dr.undertook to impute to the writer plainly a forfeiture of his claim, and to de mand of him to come on immediately, or part of his salary would probably be taken from him for the neglect ; whilst he did not him- self condescend to pay any attention to his own neglect of the only condition, upon which the writer was, according to the agreement, under any obligation to go to Middlebury. In a word, he in this manner demanded of the writer to come on, when he had not him- self fulfilled the preliminary condition. But as, from the agreement and the facts, it appeared to the writer, that any imputation of a forfeiture on his part was entirely unmerited, so, from the consequences to be apprehended from it, it was utterly inadmissible. He felt himself, therefore, reduced to the necessity of showing in his answer, of the 23d of May, that there were no grounds, upon which such an imputation could be sustained. At the same time, as there was no other possible way to remove the unmerited imputation, and prevent the conse- quences, he was, in his own view, absolutely compelled to state it as indispensable, that the engagement to pay his salary from the time of his dismission should be ratified, as the President had as- sured him that it should be, and as he had every reason to expect that it would have been long before. To secure the salary how- ever,' as he afterwards stated to the President, was not the ob- ject. If he had been informed, that the funds of the College would not admit of continuing it, or that it was needed to employ a Tu- tor in his absence, he would have given it up,' and would have pro- vided for himself, for the time necessary to complete his prepara- tion, without asking any remuneration. But it was the idea, that part of his salary was liable to be taken from him under the impu- tation of a forfeiture, which so forcibly struck his mind. This was in his apprehension pregnant with the most serious conse- quences. It was calculated to prevent his entrance upon his pro- fessorship at Middlebury, with any prospect of satisfaction or suc- In this view, he observed to the President, that, whilst he was doing the best, that his health and circumstances would per- mit, to prepare himself for the place, and at no inconsiderable ex- pense, he should prefer to relinquish the whole, or no part of his salary.' The mere loss of the whole salary was, in his view, mani- festlý a less evil than to suffer the consequences, if part of it were taken from him under the imputation of a forfeiture. The President had been pleased, in his letter, to draw the mat- cess. ter into such an attitude, that it appeared to be impracticable to come to a mutually good understanding upon the subject, without a particular attention to the agreement and the facts. But as the writer had no doubt, at the time he answered it, that the disposal of the business was still in the President's hands, he did not par- ticularly reflect upon any occasion, which he would have to lay the answer before the Corporation. All, that he anticipated to be ne- cessary, was, that the President would state to the Corporation, that it was proper to give the writer the security, which had been so long promised, concerning a matter, which a number of the members had already decided personally to be " altogether reason- able.” Hence he wrote, in consequence of his acquaintance with the Dr. with greater freedom than he would have done to a corpo- rate body, especially of strangers. Nor did he quote from the Dr's letters the reasons particularly, upon which he founded his observations in the answer, as he should have thought necessary, if he had considered that it would be laid before the Board. Nor was it possible for him to avoid writing under an impression of great surprise at the President's representation. He flattered him- self , however, that the Dr. would readily comprehend his meaning and design, and be willing to come to a fair understanding of the case. He could not relinquish the hope, that the President would be satisfied of the propriety of procuring the ratification of the en- gagement to pay the salary, according to the agreement; and he was particularly careful to state the proposition concerning it, pre- cisely in the sense, in which the Dr. had always stated it in his own letters. The President wrote, however, on the 10th of June, “I laid your communication before a quorum of the Corporation, last evening. They instructed me unanimously to inform you, that they cannot comply with your proposition.” The writer found, by the Dr's answer, that his letter had not on- ly been laid before the Corporation, but had also been very much misconstrued. He thought it his duty, therefore, to write one, on the 27th of June, directed to Dr. Davis as President of the Corpora- tion, with the express request that it might be laid before that body. In this the writer made a particular apology for any inadvertent expressions into which he had fallen, explained as precisely as possible every thing, which appeared to have been misunderstood, and placed the matter upon the most fair and honorable terns in his power, that they might accede to the agreement. He enter- tained a hope that all would unite in this, that it was proper to al- low a man an opportunity to explain himself. He could not per- suade himself, that a deliberative body would decide definitively upon so important a question, before they were possessed of a fair and full understanding of the subject. But though the President has admitted that the letter was un- exceptionable, and though the writer had done so much with a view to benefit the institution, yet to this communication, written on purpose to clear up the matter, they were not disposed, accord- ing to the best information which has been received, to pay any attention, either in their resolution, or in the representations, 12 which they have made of the case. The Board, as appears by the Dr's answer of the 9th of July, 1817, persisted in their resolution to refuse the writer the payment of his salary. Thus, the writer, though he had been engaged by the President, with the personal concurrence of several members of the Board, to prepare himself for the office, and though he had left his salary in their hands, at the special request of the President, to oblige them, has been subjected to the loss of all the time and money, which he has spent in their service, without any compensation. Such has been the result of the arrangement, notwithstanding the President, in his letter communicating the appointment, informed the writer expressly, that it was the “maxim” of the Board, “Get men of talents, and pay them well for their services.” The writer has procured a copy of all the resolutions of the Board of Trust, upon record, relative to the Professorship of Che- mistry. By this it appears, that, though the President informed the writer that a "quorum of the Corporation” refused to pay his salary, they made no record of it ; but proceeded, at the Com- mencement, in August, 1817, to assume as the reason for declaring the office “ vacant” that“ the Rev. Gamaliel S. Olds has hitherto neglected to enter upon the discharge of the duties of his office of Professor of Chemistry.” But the writer must own, that he does not precisely understand, with what propriety they could under- take to say, that he had in this manner neglected; when he had actually spent so much time to prepare for the office, agreeably to the express desire of the President and a number of the members, and when he had been prevented from going to Middlebury solely by their refusal to pay his salary, and when the President had not pretended, that they expected him to do any thing in his Professor- ship till after that Commencement. It likewise appears by the record, that, at the same Commence- ment, the Board, in the first place,“ resolved, that the vote of this Corporation, of the 22d of August, A. D. 1816, fixing the salary of the Professor of Chemistry, be rescinded ;" and then, “Doct. Řeu- ben D. Muzzy was accordingly appointed Professor of Chemistry.” This, as the writer's correspondent has assured him, was the close of the record “in relation to the Professorship of Chemistry.” There was, it appears by the record, no provision whatever made for the support of Doct. Muzzy. His was a nalced appointment. Thus it will be seen, that the facts, in their connexion, have all the same bearing. They not only refused to pay the writer the salary, but proceeded soon to abolish the salary, and appoint a successor without any.—They pretended, it is true, to be offended with the writer.--And were they already so much offended with Doct. Muzzy likewise, that they would not appoint him without abolish- ing the salary? Or, was it a matter of policy at Middlebury, in those days, to free themselves from the necessity of supporting the Professorship, as had been contemplated, whilst they kept up in the public view the appearance of maintaining it? The writer will not undertake to determine, the public must decide. It is no more than justice, however, to remark, that there does 13 not appear, from the President's letters, to be any reason to sup- pose, that any but the members of the Corporation, in the immedi- ate vicinity of the College, had any concern in refusing the pay- ment of the writer's salary. Nor is there any reason to believe, that the members, from a distance, who attended at the Com- mencement, were particularly informed of the facts in the case, or understood much concerning the secret of the policy, which led to that refusal, and to the appointment of a successor without any salary. It will be recollected, that the Dr. stated it as a general fact, “ The opinions of the members in this vicinity, respecting the pecuniary interests of the institution, uniformly prevail with the Board." The members of the Board at Middlebury, it seems, made such arrangements as they thought proper, and the other members concurred in them, probably without much inquiry or examination. Nor would the writer be understood, that the members, in the immediate vicinity of the College, adopted the policy which they seem to have done, without an object. He is not so uncharitable as to imagine, that they were disposed to make such an attack up- on him. He will ask leave to explain himself. It is manifest by the Dr's letters, that the funds of the College, as they stood upon paper, might be so displayed as to make a good appearance. But it is no less manifest, that the actual receipts into the treasury of the College were extremely limited. It will be recollected, that, soon after the writer's arrival at New Haven, the President stated, that“ their treasury was entirely empty, and was likely to remain so, he apprehended, for some time;" and that "it was well nigh impossible to obtain money for any purpose.” A considerable time afterwards, when the writer requested some appropriation to procure some articles of chemical apparatus, the President an- swered, on the 11th of March, “I am apprehensive the Board will be able to make but a small, if any, appropriation for an apparatus at present. Money is scarce among us at present, beyond all for- mer example.” Nor does there now appear to be any reason to question, that the President and other members of the Board in the vicinity soon began to be apprehensive, that what they should probably receive in future from the subscribtions to their funds, would fall much short of the amount, which had been anticipated. At the same time, as it has been understood, the Corporation were under a necessity of taking upon themselves a great and un- expected burden. Sometime after they had resolved to establish a Chemical Professorship, whilst the writer was preparing at New- Haven, Dr. Davis, as it is well known, was appointed to the Presi- dency not only of Hamilton, but of Yale College. There is no doubt that the Dr. was much inclined to accept the appointment at Yale. But the Corporation were exceedingly anxious to retain him, if possible, at Middlebury College. Hence, they undertook to make such a provision for him, as would be a satisfactory in- ducement to decline the appointment at Yale as well as Hamilton. It has been stated to the writer by respectable gentlemen, whose situation afforded them opportunity to be acquainted with the facts, that the Corporation undertook to pay the Dr. 83000, within seven years after the then next Commencement, and, if practica ble, to pay up all the arrearages due to him, by the same Com- mencement. The writer understood also, that they were to in- crease the President's annual salary, but of this he would not be too confident. He thinks, however, that he may rely upon the preceding statement as not materially incorrect. In consequence of this arrangement, the Dr. declined the proffered Presidency of Yale College as well as Hamilton, early in March 1817. It may be proper for the writer to observe, that he is not sure, but some of the friends of the College agreed to assist the Corpora- tion in this arrangement with the President. But it is manifest, that what they agreed to do to secure the continuance of the Presi- dent, would diminish, so much precisely, what they could afford to do to build up the additional departments of science, establish- ed at the preceding Commencement. Hence, it constituted a di- rect drawback upon the resources, which it would be possible for the Corporation to obtain for that purpose, en their other re sources were found to be inadequate. The writer has been induced to state the embarrassment of the funds, the necessity of paying the President his arrearages, if prac- ticable, at that critical time, and the unexpected burden assumed by the Board to induce him to continue with them, as an apology for the course of policy, which they adopted, to refuse one Profes- sor the payment of his salary, and to appoint another without any salary. The public will judge of the course of policy pursued in this case, by the express quotations from the President's letters and the records of the Board. It must likewise be left with the public to judge how far the facts, which the writer has just stated according to the best of his knowledge, will excuse that course of policy. And it ought to be remembered, that this whole course of policy was completed, before the Corporation knew that they were to be relieved from the burden, which they had taken upon them- selves in order to retain the President. It is well known, that the Corporation, till sometime after the Commencement, when Doct, Muzzy was appointed without any salary, expected that President Davis would continue at Middlebury. And the public will see, that, since they have received this relief, if they should find them- selves able to reannex a salary to the Professorship of Chemistry, it would make no difference in relation to the policy, in fact adopt- ed before, nor the apology, which it is necessary to make for it. The writer is aware that it has been pretended, that he wished for more time than was reasonable to make his preparation.-But the writer never asked, nor expected, more time than was neces- sary to attend through one course of lectures, upon the subjects indispensable to his preparation, and to provide for his removal with his family to Middlebury. Was this unreasonable? The Corporation of Yale College allowed Mr. Silliman, after his ap- pointment, in addition to opportunity to read by himself what he could to advantage, to spend two seasons at Philadelphia, and af. 15 terwards fifteen months in Europe, to make his preparation. This is mentioned merely to show, by an analogous case, what a number of gentlemen, who will not be considered altogether incompetent to judge, have thought was not an unreasonable time for prepara- tion. And it must be submitted to the public to decide, whether it could, with propriety, be considered any thing unreasonable, if the writer wished to spend one season at New Haven, for the same purpose ; especially, when he had been called upon to prepare him- self, if possible, to cooperate with "a highly liberal and magnani- mous set of men,” whose “determination” it was “ to make the institution highly respectable, if practicable.” But it has been pretended, that a knowledge of mineralogy was not necessary for the writer as Professor of Chemistry.-The wri- ter is obliged to acknowledge, that he has ever been surprised that the gentlemen should say this. Could it be seriously pretended, that a tolerable acquaintance with the natural history, distinguish- ing characters, and chemical composition of minerals, many of which a Professor of Chemistry would have occasion to employ or examine, was not necessary for him ? Professor Silliman says, in a letter addressed to the writer : “ The reasons, why I thought you should by all means' attend to mineralogy, are such as are in my view perfectly decisive. There is so intimate a connexion be- tween chemistry and mineralogy, that no person can sustain a respectable rank as a chemist, without being able to decide at sight, or with some chemical examination, on the nature of any mineral substance, which may be presented to him. The greater part of the subjects of chemical experiment and examination are from the mineral kingdom, and a lecturer on chemistry could neither retain, nor even acquire the confidence of his pupils, without a competent knowledge, I mean, a considerable knowledge of mineralogy." He adds, “Situated as you were at New-Haven, I should have con- sidered you as very culpable in neglecting mineralogy, and your employers would, in my opirion, have had just cause for censuring you, had you neglected it. These observations he makes, upon the supposition explicitly, that mineralogy, as a distinct branch of science, might be assigned to another Professor. But it has been pretended, that the writer gave occasion for of- fence, in his letter of the 23d of May, in answer to the President's of the 3d of the same month. The reader will recollect, that the letter was written in answer to the Dr's extraordinary one, in which he was understood to im- pute to the writer, to his great surprise, a forfeiture of his claim, and to demand of him to come on immediately, or part of his sala- ry would probably be taken from him for the neglect ; and all this, notwithstanding he had not himself fulfilled the preliminary condition. At the same time, it was manifest, by the Dr's reply, that the occasion was taken from a misconstruction of the writer's meaning. For this purpose, they even construed some part of the letter in direct opposition to the express language. Thus, they pretended, that the writer thought it an indignity to discharge the functions of a Tutor, and so spoke disrespectfully of the offi- 16 cers, notwithstanding he had informed the President expressly, in the very passage alluded to, that he should be willing to dis- charge the functions of a Tutor, if circumstances would permit; or as he immediately suggested, if it would not oblige him to re- linquish his preparation as Professor of Chemistry. The end, however, for which the topic was introduced, was simply to in- quire, whether any imputation of a forfeiture could be sustained upon this ground whether the President would say, that the wri- ter had agreed to go to Middlebury for that purpose, and had for- feited his claim, on that account ?" And this the President entirely disclaimed. The writer, as has been already mentioned, made, in his letter intended for the Corporation, a particular apology for any inad- vertent expressions into which he had fallen, and explained as precisely as possible every thing, which appeared to have been misunderstood. But to this, as there is good reason to believe, they were not disposed to pay any attention. They calculated, it appears, to make a different arrangement, and save the expense of fulfilling the agreement with the writer. The President said in his answer, “The Corporation,” that is, the members in the immediate vicinity of the College,“ have to a man the fullest conviction, that, as circumstances now are,” (ob- serve) “as circumstances now are, your removal to this place would not be conducive to the prosperity of the institution.” “ As cir- cumstances then were,” it appears by the facts, they thought it preferable to abolish the salary, and appoint a successor without any. Hence the public are requested to determine, whether they could pay any attention to the writer's letter, consistently with their policy. If they were resolved not to pay the salary, would they not naturally wish to make such an impression upon the pub- lic mind, as would be calculated to excuse them, and cast the blame upon him ? And may it not be conceived, in perfect consist- ency with the facts, that the more vague and intangible the im- pression was, the better it would answer the purpose, because it would give more play to the imagination, and be less susceptible of refutation? To close the matter, the President said, “ The im- pression” (which however he did not condescend to specify) “I am confident, is not to be done away, either by arguments, or explana- tions. Further discussion of the subject, therefore, would be use- less. The public will see, that they were determined not to hearken to any thing. Neither "arguments," nor "explanations," if the President was not mistaken, were of any use to this delibera- tive body. And it may be asked, whether, “as circumstances then were,” that is, when they thought, it seems, they could save what was due to the writer, and appoint a successor without any salary, they would suffer the impression to be done away, when it would do away, at the same time, all the excuse, which they had for excluding a Professor from his office, and refusing to pay him his salary? But notwithstanding any impression, which they had on their own minds, the President added, in behalf of himself and the Corporation, "Be assured, Sir, that we have no disposition to 17 doubt, that you rest in the rectitude of your intentions, or that this to you is no small consolation.” The gentlemen, as the writer has been informed, never considered his letters and the President's candidly together. The writer, how- ever, has laid them before several individuals of christian character, and the first respectability in this part of the country, and they say, with- out one dissenting voice, that if the letters be taken together, the wri- ter gave no just occasion for offence, nor any just cause of complaint. The President, in his letter of the 10th of June, pretended to take an exception, because the writer had not fixed the time precisely, when he should be at Middlebury; and even undertook to say, that the writus might" think two or three years requisite and reasonable for his preparation." But this was certainly without any just foundation. For, it appears from the Dr's own letter of the 3d of May, that he understood perfect- ly well, that what the writer wanted, if he could be spared, was to at- tend through the course of lectures on mineralogy ; and he must have known from the nature of the thing that it would take a little time af- terwards to prepare and remove with his family to Middlebury. It appears from the same statement also, that he knew that the writer ex- pected, notwithstanding, to be absent probably but a part of the summer. The writer had proceeded upon the idea of going to Middlebury, if there was any necessity of his assistance there, which would super- sede the propriety of his continuing his preparation. It was for this reason, that he stated to his friends, before Professor Hall came, as Professor Silliman and others may probably recollect, that the time, when he should go to Middlebury, depended upon the necessity of his assistance there. And it will be recollected, that he had contin- ued in New Haven after the time, which the President had proposed, because he understood from Professor Hall, that he could be spared well enough. Nor had he ever understood from what the President had informed him, that it was intended that he should relinquish his preparation in order to be at Middlebury by the 1st of May, till the 21st of that month, when he received the Dr's favor of the 3d. That ✓ the writer should go to Middlebury, at the time, and for the purpose specified, was indeed, in his view, to be regarded by both parties, ac- cording to the agreement, as a matter merely of accommodation. He did not suppose that any forfeiture could be predicated upon the fact, that he had not gone. But still, in his answer of the 23d of May, the difficulty was represented to consist in the consequences, to be ap- prehended from the unmerited imputation of a forfeiture on his part, and the uncertainty arising out of it, “ whether the Corporation would be willing to allow him his salary for the whole time.” This difficulty he stated to the President to be precisely the thing, which precluded him from acceding to his demand to proceed to Middlebury immedi- ately;" and he flattered himself that the Dr. would see upon candid reflection," that it was proper that this difficulty should be removed. It appeared, however, by the answer of the 10th of June, that the President, instead of removing the difficulty, and preparing the way for the writer to come, chose to make the incidental circumstance, that V S 18 the writer had not fixed the time precisely when he should be at Mid- dlebury, a pretence for rejecting the arrangement. This was a new expedient. It was indeed a critical circumstance, which, the writer never understood before, was to be made a condition of ratifying the agreement. They had hitherto neglected to ratify it, though the prom- ise had been repeatedly made that it should be done, and now they resolved to reject it upon this circumstance. But when the President knew the time so nearly, as he admitted that he did, and when he said, “ the Corporation were willing that the writer should have a reasona- ble time to prepare,” why was the precise time made a matter of so much consequence? But the writer was anxious, if possible, to remove every exception. In his answer, of the 27th of June, intended for the Corporation, he stated, as nearly as it could be done, that, upon sup- position, he might be permitted to finish his preparation, he did not expect to stay any time after the middle of the summer. Before the Dr's letter of the 3d of May was received, the writer had never sup, posed, that a few weeks would be considered material, because he had never anticipated, that any design was formed to oblige him to go to Middlebury by the 1st of May, whether he were prepared, or not. But afterwards, though he did not suppose, to be sure that they could with propriety insist upon it according to the agreement, yet if they had said, that it was necessary for him to give up his preparation, nothing would have prevented his going to Middlebury immediately : provided, they had been disposed to remove the strange and unex- pected difficulty to prevent it, which had been created in his view, by the unmerited imputation of a forfeiture of his claim, and by calling in question "whether the Corporation would allow him his salary for the whole time.” The President inferred from a single unguarded expression, in the writer's letter of the 23d of May, that he claimed an unlimited dis- cretion in relation to the time. But this arose from a misapprehen- sion of the writer's meaning. In his answer, designed for the Corpo ration, he stated expressly, that it was not his intention to claim an unlimited discretion, and explained precisely his meaning in the par- agraph, from which the expression was taken. It was simply this, that it would not be reasonable, in the opinion of the writer, to subject him to a forfeiture, (admitting that he found occasion to employ in his preparation some more time than they expected) when, both by the agreement and the nature of the thing, it would be understood that he was to have some discretion in the case. Though the President did not pretend to question that he had agreed, that the writer should have a right to be absent on Saturday and Monday to enable him, if he pleased to preach abroad on the Sab- bath, yet he seemed to be disposed to insinuate some exception to it. In his letter of the 10th of June, he said, “ While the Corporation have no objection to their Professors' supplying vacant churches in the vicinity on the Sabbath, they do not deem it necessary or proper to ratify, by a formal vote, your right to be absent from College three days out of seven for this purpose.” The writer supposed, from the particular conversation upon the subject, when the agreement was 19 made, that the President would be both able and willing to explain this circumstance. But as it did not appear that he had done it, the writer thought it expedient, in his letter intended for the Corporation, to give the following explanation. You will probably recollect, Sir, that when I made my proposals to you at Greenfield, it was a privi- lege of no small importance, in my estimation, to be absent on Satur- day and Monday to enable me to preach abroad, because I did not think it consistent with my duty to relinquish my profession. Nei- ther at that time, however, nor when I wrote you last, did I expect to be absent, on those days, any longer than would be necessary for that purpose. In my estimate, it amounted to no more than a part of two days out of six. I did not apprehend, that my absence on the Sab- bath would be supposed to interfere with my business at the College. This, with what you further say, upon the same point, seems to imply that I made the formal ratification of this right an indispensable con- dition. But if you advert to my letter, Sir, you will see that this is a mistake. I mentioned it merely to prevent any future misunder- standing or dissatisfaction, and if it was so understood and admitted as to answer this purpose, it was all that I wished.' It has been pretended, that the writer expected to be appointed Professor of Mathematics and Natural Philosophy, at Yale College, in the place of Mr. Day.—But this surely requires no other notice than a simple declaration of the fact that the writer had no expecta- tion of it, and the pretence was, so far as he knows, without so much as a shadow of reason. The gentlemen, in their solicitude to find some kind of apology for themselves, have endeavored to fasten an imputation upon the writer, by pretending that he had some difficulty at Williams College, which led to his resignation there. They have been so intent upon excus- ing themselves, it seems that they have overlooked the impropriety of making a matter an objection, after they appointed him, which, they had declared by that very act, was in their view no objection before. The writer has sufficient proof, that Dr. Davis, who was well acquaint- ed with it, considered his conduct in that case, so far from being any objection, that it was rather a recommendation to his appointment at Middlebury. But the evil to be apprehended from the misrepresen- tation at this late day, he is persuaded, will carry with it its own anti- dote. And the intelligent public will readily see, as it may be pre- sumed, that the gentlemen would have no occasion to resort to any such foreign consideration, if they were not conscious that they could not justify themselves upon the merits of the cause. The writer is aware, that the advocates of President Davis and the Corporation of Middlebury College, in relation to this business, bave a great interest, and of course a strong temptation, to misrepresent his conduct and character. Hence, he has not been surprised, that they have pretended, that he expected an appointment at Yale, or had some difficulty at Williams' College. Nor would it be surprising, if they should attempt to represent his dismission from his people, though agreeable to the express desire of the President and Corporation of Middlebury College, and the unanimous voice of a venerable Ecclesi- 20 that they astical Council, in some unfavorable light, if possible, so as to form some sort of apology for the policy of the Board. The public will see, have an interest to find something, if practicable, somewhere, however innocent in itself, which may be so represented as to make at least an apparent excuse. It is to be apprehended, that they will be disposed to keep up the course of vague suggestion and misrepresentation, be- cause it is their interest to do so. Nor will the public think it strange, if they should endeavor, under these circumstances, to cast reproach upon this statement of facts, and upon the author, in the Newspapers, instead of making any attempt to furnish a fair answer. But if they cannot explain the facts in the case, so as to make a fair answer, when they have so much interest to do it, the candid and intelligent public, it is presumed, will know how to appreciate, duly, the interest they may take in pursuing a different course. The writer requests permission to repeat his unfeigned regret, that he has been reduced to the necessity of troubling the public upon this subject. He wishes that he could have escaped from the painful du- ty of stating unwelcome truths. But he is persuaded that the candid public will see, that it had become indispensable in this case. He has ever been, and still is, anxious to submit the whole matter to dis- interested men of christian character. It is to him a subject of much regret, that he could not obtain an adjustment of the business in this fair and amicable way. If indeed the gentlemen could have been satisfied to take his salary, without attempting at the same time to in- jure his character, he would have submitted in silence. From the deep interest, which he had cherished for the institution, he would have endured without impatience, what he could not have forborne to consider as injustice. Nor has he ever been reluctant to make all the allowance, which candor and charity would require, for the ne- cessity, under which the gentlemen appear to have acted in the busi- He sincerely hopes, that what he has suffered, maybe so over- ruled by the good providence of God, as to prevent any similar error in the administration of the College, and the suffering of any other in- dividual. He fervently prays, that the institution may become a great and lasting blessing to the community. It has, by no means, been his design to impeach in any manner the general character ei- ther of President Davis, or any portion of the Corporation of Middle- bury College. And if, as he cannot avoid believing, the gentlemen have, in this particular instance, been overtaken with a fault, he would devoutly pray God not to lay it to their charge. . It has been the intention of the writer to state the facts in the case with correctness and precision. If, however, he has inadvertently fallen into any mistake, he wishes that it may be corrected. If he has, though it must have been unintentional, made any remark, with any degree of severity more than was necessary, he begs the public, and particularly the gentlemen concerned, to forgive him. GAMALIEL S. OLDS. Greenfield, Franklin County, Mass. May 20th, A.D. 1818. ness. Pam olds, Gamaliel S. (Gamaliel Smith) 1818 OL 37285 [Harper