GREAT LAKES RESEARCH INSTITUTE
University of Michigan
EXPLORATION OF COLLATERAL DATA POTENTIALLY
APPLICABLE TO GREAT LAKES HYDROGRAPHY
AND FISHERIES
Phase I
Final Report


U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Contract No. 14-19-008-9381
Charles F. Powers
Research Associate
David L. Jones
Research Associate
John C. Ayers
Project Director
Ann Arbor, Michigan
July 31, L958




I




TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section                                             Page
1. Introduction...................       1
2. Procedure.........................             3
3. Compilation of Information..............     10
4. Explanation of Tables,................11
I.  Table 1......,...,....,.......  11
II. Table 2.................. 110
III.  Table  3...........................130
5.  Summary.. *.  *......................... 132
Appendix - Bibliography................... * 139




I




LIST OF FIGURES
Figure                                                                   Page
1.  Questionnaire on meteorological and hydrographic records.      5
2.  Orientation Chart, Lake Superior and St. Marys River....         17
3. Orientation Chart, Lake Michigan............      37
4.  Orientation Chart, Lake Huron..............                63
5.  Orientation Chart, Lake Erie (including St. Clair River,
Lake St. Clair, Detroit River, and Niagara River)......         75
6.  Orientation Chart, Lake Ontario................  99
7.  Orientation Chart, Great Lakes Drainage Basin.........112
8.  Per cent frequency of all potential data sources.......       137
9. Summary of knowledge of all potential data sources......  138




I




LIST OF TABLES


Numbez
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.


Onshore Data Sources
Inland Data Sources
Unusable Data Sources
Summary of Knowledge <
Summary of Knowledge c


0~        *    #~        0 v


Page.   *    *... 18.....  1  113...... 131....   133.... 135


of All Potential Data Sources
of Usable Data Sources..








1o  INTRODUCTION


The Great Lakes are undoubtedly the most important single source of
fresh water in the world. Their waters are utilized for numerous economic
needs, such as commercial and sport fishing, power generation, municipal
water supplies, industrial uses, recreation, and navigation. In line with
this high degree of economic importance, the Great Lakes are now and will
most likely continue to be the subjects of various scientific studies and
investigations, carried out with a view toward obtaining a more lucid understanding of their physical, chemical, and biological properties and
mechanisms0  In conjunction with studies such as these, personnel of the
Great Lakes Fisheries Investigations suggested that a great deal of limnological and meteorological information relative to the Lakes and their
drainage basins would likely be available from agencies in both the United
States and Canada. Likely sources would be those which routinely make use
of raw lake water, such as municipal water treatment plants, disposal
plants, power plants, and industries. In addition, it was believed that
data might also be obtained from various governmental agencies —federal,
state, and provincial. Parameters which might possibly be located were
thought to include water temperature, turbidity, pH, color, and odor;
chemical analyses of water; biological analyses, such as bacterial and
plankton counts; water level; lake surface condition; and numerous meteorological observations, such as air temperature, precipitation, wind
speed and direction, humidity, radiation, evaporation, pressure, visibility, and cloud cover.
Up to the present time little was known specifically about the
availability, reliability, and extent of any data such as those enumerated above. In addition, data would likely be widely scattered and hence
of little practical use to anyone interested in utilizing the contained
informationo It became apparent, therefore, that the location and evaluation of these collateral data should become the object of a special
study.
It was proposed that the execution of such a study could best be
accomplished in three phases, with the exact nature and extent of each
succeeding phase governed by findings of the preceding one. Phase I
would be designed to locate and determine the extent of records in the
Great Lakes area that might be useful in developing a better understanding of Great Lakes hydrographyo Phase II would involve a pilot study in
a selected section of the Great Lakes in which all available data would
be examined to determine the reliability and usefulness of the various
types of recordsoV In Phase III all records demonstrated by Phase II to be
of value in hydrographic and biological studies of the Great Lakes would
be accumulated t-er a period determined by the completeness arid cbngruity of data,'and recorded itt a form suitable for easy referefice and use
in future studiedo
Phase I was undertaken by the Great Lakds Research Institute during
the past fiscal year, and is the subject of the present report.
Many persons, institutions, and agencies have been of immeasurable
aid in the successful conduct of this investigation. The investigators
wish to gratefully acknowledge the invaluable assistance and wholehearted cooperation of the following persons who, in various ways, were
instrumental in helping locate sources of meteorological and hydrographic
data: Dr. James W. Moffett, Chief, Great Lakes Fishery Investigations, U.


S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Dr. Stanford H. Smith,




2


Fishery Research Biologist, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ann Arbor,
Michigan; Dr. Ralph Hile, Fishery Research Biologist, U. S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Dr. Alfred M. Beeton, U. S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, Ann Arbor, Michigan; James H. Johnson, Fishery
Research Biologist, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
Dr. D. V. Anderson, Ontario Department of Lands and Forests, Maple,
Ontario; Dr. Albert Ballert, Great Lakes Commission, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
N. H. Beamer, U. S. Geological Survey, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Dr.
Albert E. Berry, General Manager, Ontario Water Resources Commission,
Toronto, Ontario; Prof. Herbert M. Bosch, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota; C. C. Boughner, Chief, Climatological Section, Department of Transport, Toronto, Ontario; A. V. DeLaporte,
Director of Laboratories and Research, Ontario Water Resources Commission,
Toronto, Ontario; Earl Devendorf, Director, Bureau of Environmental Sanitation, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York; A. H.
Eichmeier, State Climatologist, U. S. Weather Bureau, East Lansing, Michigan; N. G. Gray, Dominion Hydrographer, Department of Mines and Technical
Surveys, Ottawa, Canada; J. R. Harvey, Regional Sanitary Engineer, Department of Health, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Meadville, Pennsylvania;
J. H. Hubble, U. S. Geological Survey, Columbus, Ohio; Russell L. Johnson,
Engineer in Charge, Michigan Department of Health, Escanaba, Michigan;
Ray Joiner, Assistant to the Director, National Weather Records Center,
U. S. Weather Bureau, Asheville, North Carolina; Lothar A. Joos, State
Climatologist, U. S. Weather Bureau, Champaign, Illinois; Homer Knox,
Principal Assistant Sanitary Engineer, State Department of Health, Columbus,
Ohio; Robert Knutilla, U. S. Geological Survey, Escanaba, Michigan; W. T.
Laidley, Chief Technical Assistant, U. S. Lake Survey Office, Detroit,
Michigan; C. R. MacLean, Captain, U. S. Coast Guard, Chief, Operations
Division, Ninth Coast Guard District, Cleveland, Ohio; Colin MacMillan,
Marathon Paper Mills, Marathon, Ontario; Dr. 0. J. Muegge, State Sanitary
Engineer, State of Wisconsin Board of Health, Madison, Wisconsin; L. T.
Pierce, State Climatologist, U. S. Weather Bureau, Columbus, Ohio; Dr.
B. A. Poole, Director, Bureau of Environmental Sanitation, Indiana State
Board of Health, Indianapolis, Indiana; H. W. Poston, Assistant Regional
Engineer, U. S. Public Health Service, Chicago, Illinois; Jack Rademacher,
Sanitary Engineer, U. S. Public Health Service, Chicago, Illinois; Lawrence
A. Schaal, State Climatologist, U. S. Weather Bureau, Lafayette, Indiana;
Cdr. E. 0. Standish, Office of Chief of Naval Operations, U. S. Navy,
Washington, D. C.; The State Climatologist, U. S. Weather Bureau, Albany,
New York; Joseph H. Strub, Jr., State Climatologist, U. S. Weather Bureau,
Minneapolis, Minnesota; J. F. J. Thomas, Head, Industrial Waters Section,
Department of Mines and Technical Surveys, Ottawa, Ontario; Kenneth G.
Tower, Regional Engineer, Federal Power Commission, Chicago, Illinois; T.
L. Vander Velde, Chief, Section of Water Supply, Division of Engineering,
Michigan Department of Health, Lansing, Michigan; Paul J. Waite, State
Climatologist, U. S. Weather Bureau, Madison, Wisconsin; Fredrick H. Waring,
Chief Engineer, State Department of Health, Columbus, Ohio; George
Whetstone, U. S. Geological Survey, Columbus, Ohio; G. H. Wood, District
Engineer, Department of Northern Affairs and National Resources, Water
Resources Branch, Ottawa, Ontario; Frank L. Woodward, Director, Division
of Environmental Sanitation, Minnesota Department of Health, Minneapolis,
Minnesota.
The investigators are no less indebted to the various persons who were
contacted at the individual agencies during the course of the study. The


limitations of space do not permit listing them here, but the majority have
been identified in the tabulation of sources in Table 1. To all these per



2. PROCEDURE


In order to expedite the search for data sources, the study was divided into two basic parts: the hydrographic and the meteorological.
This was a natural division since the bulk of the meteorological data
was expected to originate at points apart from the sources of hydrographic data. However, it was known that certain agencies obtaining
routine hydrographic data also obtained concomitant meteorological observations. In such cases, it became the responsibility of the personnel in the hydrographic division of the study to ascertain the necessary information relative to the meteorological observations, and to
then transmit it to personnel in the meteorological division. The primary reason that many meteorological sources are different from hydrographic sources is because it was deemed necessary to obtain meteorological data not only around the periphery of the I~akes, but inland for
some distance as well. The influence of the Lakes on weather conditions,
and the influence of weather on the Lakes, is known to encompass an area
around the Lakes as well as over the Lakes themselves. The exact limits
of this "area of influence" are yet not completely determined, but for
the purposes of this study have been confined to the drainage area of
the Great Lakes (Fig. 7).
The first effort by project personnel to locate all pertinent
sources of meteorological data within the Great Lakes basin was made by
contacting the National Weather Records Center of the U. S. Weather Bureau at Asheville, North Carolina, and the Meteorological Division of the
Canadian Department of Transport in Toronto, Ontario. These two agencies provided project personnel with information on meteorological data
that is published. This comprised the largest source of all types of
data uncovered by the project: 808 sources or 68.6 per cent of the
total of 1177 sources (see Table 4, p. 133).
All other meteorological data sources ascertained by the project are
comprised of unpublished, unprocessed data on file at each station or a
central repository. The data are recorded by U. S. Coast Guard Stations
(some of the data from a few of these are published in U. S. Weather
Bureau climatological summaries), water treatment plants, industries and
power plants, sewage treatment plants, paper mills, commercial and research lake vessels, and a few other sources such as university research
groups, individual observers, and governmental and public service organizations.
The search for hydrographic sources was initiated by concentrating
first upon the water treatment plants. Information concerning data available from such plants in the United States was obtained by contacting
the head offices of the public health departments of the states bordering
the Great Lakes; Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New York, and Wisconsin. In Michigan and Ohio, at least a portion
of the data from these plants was found to be available from the head
offices, where it is kept on file. In the other states, data are retained in the files of the individual plants, from which they may be obtained. Information on water treatment plants in Ontario was furnished
by the Ontario Water Resources Commission.
Another source investigated early in the study comprised the power
plants which utilize water from the Lakes. A list of all such plants on


3,




4


the United States side of the Lakes was obtained from the Federal Power
Commission at Chicago; this list included public utilities, industries,
and municipal plants. For information on the Canadian side, the HydroElectric Power Commission of Ontario was contacted.
The pertinent water treatment plants and power plants were then contacted individually. In some cases personal visits were possible, but
usually contact was by mail. Each potential data source not visited by
project personnel was sent a letter outlining the project, its aims and
purpose, and the type of cooperation sought. Included with the letter
was a three-page questionnaire designed to facilitate the agency's
reply. The questionnaire, which is reproduced in Figure 1, is a form on
which each observation could be entered, whether hydrographic or meteorological. Space for pertinent information concerning the observation
was also provided. It will be noted that a good deal of the information
requested on the questionnaire, i.e., time of observation, type of instrument or process, instrument sensing element, and name of observer, are
items which were not required under the terms of the study, but were considered pertinent and hence ascertained whenever possible. Information
relating to these items was not determined for all cooperating agencies,
and is not included in this report. That which is known is on file with
the Great Lakes Research Institute.
It should be pointed out here that rigid adherence to a strict
policy in contacting and obtaining information from the various agencies
was not possible; that is, in some cases the use of questionnaires was
impractical, in others they served to collect information that otherwise
would likely have been overlooked.
The water treatment plants and power plants constituted the bulk of
the hydrographic data sources from which any great variety of data were
available. However, a number of additional agencies contacted also were
able to make significant contributions. Specific reference to these
agencies is made in section 3 of this report,
During the course of the investigation, items of pertinent literature appeared from time to time, and have been included in the Bibliography (see Appendix). Also included in the Bibliography are selected
references from a bibliography of the Great Lakes (Van Oosten, John.
Great Lakes Fauna, Flora, and their Environment. A Bibliography. Great
Lakes Commission, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1957). Selection of these references
was based upon applicability to the interest area of the project.
Contained within Van Oosten's bibliography are 138 papers from Lake
Erie on subjects within the interest area of this project, 57 from Lake
Michigan, 22 from Lake Superior, 19 from Lake Ontario, 13 from Lake
Huron, and 42 pertinent to all the Great Lakes. Of these, there are
certain papers which cover comparable subjects at different times and
which have promise of providing direct material upon possible changes in
the Great Lakes.




Figure 1




UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
GREAT LAKES RESEARCH INSTITUTE
U. S. Dept. of Interior - Great Lakes Collateral Data
QUESTIONNAIRE ON METEOROLOGICAL AND HYDROGRAPHIC RECORDS


Organization_____.


Address


Date


Parameter
Measured


Time of
Observation


Period
of
Record


Type of
Instrument or
Process


Instrument Sensing
Element
Exposure Location


Disposition of
Data


Name of
Observer


Remarks


lr teperature
extremes
Water temperature
extremes
ice formation
ice dissipation


i




Figure 1 (cont.)


Parameter
Measured


Time of
Observation


Period
of
Record


Type of
Instrument or
Process


0'


Instrument Sensing
Element
Exposure Location


Disposition of
Data


Name of
Observer


Remarks


Precipitation
liquid
solid
solid cover
extremes
Wind speed
instantaneous
ment
extremes
ii             -         -  [I~J                   ~   l I
ind direction
Iumidity
dew point
Solar radiation
w   w....   =..   =   Wa.   W   w   - -. w   -.   - -. =..  W   -..   -L


@vaporation




Parameter
Measured


Time of
Observation


Period
of
Record


Type of
Ins trument or
Process


Figure 1 (cont.)
Instrument Sensing
Element
Exposure Location


Disposition of
Data


Name of
Observer


Remarks


Pressure
Visibility
Cloud cover
types
heights
Lther (specify)
hemical Analyses
Total alkaU nity  _____ --- —----------------------
Total hardness.........
n PH                 l________ _________l... ___
Other (speci



i
I


Parameter
lieasured


I
I


~Time of
Observation




Period
of
R~ecord




Type of
Ins trument or.Process


I


Figure 1 (cont.)
Instrument Sensing
Element
Exposure Location




Disposition of
Data




Name of
Observer,




Remarks






t


Physical  Analyse    _ _ _  _            _  _ _  _ _  _ _  _    _  _ _  _    _ _ _  _ _    _  _ _  _
Turbidity
Color
Odor
Other (speci-- -
iological
al~seStandard
plate count
Coliform
Plankton
ater level
ater currents
av heights
ther (specify)




I


F

I


t


I


I




9
The bibliography appended to the report does not represent, and is
not intended to represent, an exhaustive compilation of all literature
pertinent to hydrographic and meteorological aspects of the Great Lakes.
It is included for the convenience of the reader, as a compilation of
pertinent literature that has come to the attention of the investigators
during the course of this study.




3. COMPILATION OF INFORMATION


Most of the information relating to sources of data is of such nature that it can be readily tabulated. In Table 1 are listed sources of
hydrographic and/or meteorological data that are located on the periphery of the Lakes. All meteorological stations located no farther than
two miles from the lake shore are included in this table. Entries have
been listed geographically, proceeding counterclockwise around each Lake,
as noted in the table.
In Table 2 are listed all those sources of meteorological data occurring within the Great Lakes drainage basin but located more than two
miles from the nearest Great Lake. Geographical listing by state or
province is shown. It is not feasible in Table 2 to list each station
geographically, hence items have been entered alphabetically by state or
province. Individual stations may be located by use of the included
coordinates.
To facilitate geographical orientation, a series of six orientation
plates have been included, five within Table 1 and one preceding Table 2.
Figures 2 through 6 depict the five Lakes:   Superior, Michigan, Huron,
Erie, and Ontario. The St. Marys River appears in Figure 2, and the St.
Clair River, Lake St. Clair, Detroit River, and Niagara River in Figure
6. Figure 7 shows the entire area of the Great Lakes drainage basin.
All meteorological sources within this basin that have been ascertained
by the present research are listed, partly in Table 1 and in all of
Table 2; all hydrographic data sources on the periphery of the Lakes are
listed as part of Table 1. In addition, station circles are shown in
Figure 7 outside the drainage basin periphery. These are meteorological
stations that are in close proximity to the basin periphery. They are
listed as part of the present research since there are frequent occurrences where suitable data sources close to the periphery, but within the
basin, are not available.
Table 3 contains all those sources which, for specified reasons, had
no usable data, or so few that they were considered unsuited to the purposes of this study.


10




4. EXPLANATION OF TABLES


An explanation of the contents of Tables 1, 2, and 3 is given at
this point in order to facilitate understanding of the information presented.
I. Table 1
A. Pagination
The large volume of information pertinent to each data source has
necessitated the use of two pages for each source. These appear on
facing pages which are numbered consecutively0  The information is presented in eight groups (five Lakes, three connecting waterways) beginning
with Lake Superior and proceeding eastward. Data sources are listed geographically within each group beginning at an arbitrary point and proceeding counterclockwise around each Lake or through each of the waterways.
Each data source location is numbered serially within its group,
the number appearing in the first column of each facing page. Numbers
identify the location on the second page where designation by name has
been omitted.
B. Agency and Contact
In column 3, Agency refers to the particular organization which
obtains data at the specific location designated in column 2; Contact
refers to the person within the organization who should be consulted in
regard to any data recorded.
In the tabulations a contact is not given for stations whose records
are available from some central compilation office. Agencies included
in this category are as follows:
1. UO S. Weather Bureau First Order, Second Order and Cooperative
stations, U. SO. Naval Air Stations, and U0 S. Air Force Bases. Data
from these agencies are filed with and obtainable from the National
Weather Records Center, Asheville, North Carolina.
2. Canadian Meteorological Division Class 1, II, III, and c
stations. Data from these agencies are filed with and obtainable from
the Climatological Section, Meteorological Division, Department of
Transport, Toronto, Ontario.
3. U. S.^ Lake Survey water level records, Data are obtainable
from the U. S. Lake Survey Office, 630 Federal Building, Detroit 26,
Michigan.
4. Canada Bydrographic Service water level records. Data are obtainable from the Dominion Hydrographer, Canadian Hydrographic Service,
Canada Department of Mines and Technical Surveys, Ottawa, Ontario.
5. U, S. Coast Guard installations. With respect to collection of


11




12


meteorological and lake state data, Coast Guard installations are divided into two categories: those making regular reports every six hours
to the U. S. Weather Bureau, and those which take four-hourly observations; most of the latter are retained by the Coast Guardo
Data from the former category are obtainable from the National
Weather Records Center at Asheville, and from the latter are obtainable
from U, S. Coast Guard Headquarters, Washington, D. C.  Coast Guard
station personnel retain copies of the meteorological logs for a period
of twelve months; hence, data for any immediately preceding year may be
obtained directly from the station in question. In Table 1, the sixhourly and four-hourly stations are so designated.
6. Naval Air Stations; U. S. Air Force Bases, Data are filed with
and obtainable from the National Weather Records Center at Asheville,
7. Michigan municipal water treatment plants. All plant records
are filed with the Michigan Department of Health. Information on Upper
Peninsula plants may be obtained from the Michigan Department of Health,
19th Street and 13th Avenue North, Escanaba, Michigan, Information on
Lower Peninsula plants is obtainable from the Michigan Department of
Health, Division of Engineering, Lansing 4, Michigan0
In Column 3 of Table I, contacts for Michigan water treatment
plants are indicated by either Escanaba or Lansing, to specify the data
location,
C0 Modification of Contact Procedure
In regard to municipal water treatment plants located in Ohio, a
modified contact procedure is recommended. Chemical data obtained at
the plants arefiled with the Ohio State Department of Health at Columbus,
but some physical data may be retained at plants and may be obtained directly from the individual plant operators.  Initial inquiries should be addressed to the Chief Engineer, State Department of Health, 301 Ohio
Departments Building, Columbus, Ohio.
In Column 3 of Table 1, contacts for Ohio water treatment plants
will indicate the name of the superintendent of the plant, followed by
Columbus,
D, Period of Record
The number of years over which records are available has been ascertained for a large number of the located data sources. Under the
period of record for a particular agency, a specific date followed by a
dash indicates that data are available from that year to the present.
Records pertaining to Uo S. Weather Bureau First and Second Order and
Cooperative stations indicate the amount of data available in terms of
total years.  These are not necessarily consecutive years; hence, ascertainment of any missing record is accomplished only by examination of
the complete history of the station in question. Accordingly, periods
of record for Uo So Weather Bureau stations are entered in Table 1 as




13


total years of data, and specific dates are not giveno
Periods of record of Canadian Meteorological Division stations are
not, at the time of publication, readily available for all stations.
The Climatological Section of the Division is, however, in the process
of compiling this information which should be available within a few
weeks after the date of issue of this report.
Information of the lengths of records of U. S. Coast Guard installations likewise is not readily available, but may be obtained for fourhourly stations from the Coast Guard Headquarters at Washington, D. C.,
and for six-hourly stations from the National Weather Records Center at
Asheville.
Water level records obtained from gaugings of the U. So Lake Survey
and Canadian Hydrographic Service are available back to 1860 for each
Lake and for connecting waterways. The single exception is the St. Clair
River, for which records are available back to 1898.
The water level records are regularly published as monthly means,
in both tabular and hydrograph form, for each Lake taken as a unit.
Records for individual gauges are available only upon specific requests
Periods of record vary among individual gauges, and hence the date 1860
does not necessarily refer to any particular gauge, but rather to average values for each Lake.
United States water level data are available from the U, S. Lake
Survey, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, 630 Federal Building, Detroit 26,
Michigan.
Canadian water level data are available from the Dominion Hydrographer, Canadian Hydrographic Service, Canada Department of Mines and
Technical Surveys, Ottawa, Ontario.
The periods of record for some sources may vary internally, that
is, different observations have been carried out for varying lengths of
time. In such cases the notation "variable —see data" has been entered
in the Period of Record column, and the appropriate dates have been
entered in the individual parameter columns. In some of these cases,
the period of record is known for some data, but not for others. In
this event, observations known to be taken, but for which the period of
record is unknown, are indicated by "(X)"'
The symbol "X" (not enclosed by parentheses) is used in two instances, 1) whenever it is known that the period of record is homogeneous for the observations taken; that is, whenever there is a single
known period of record which embraces all the observations made at the
particular station, and 2) whenever it is known that observations are
made at the station, but the period of record is not known for any of
them,
Unmarked spaces in Table 1 indicate that, so far as it is known to
the investigators, no observations are made of that parameter.




14


E. Data
Many meteorological data are obtained by U. S. Weather Bureau First
and Second Order stations, Canadian Meteorological Division Class I stations, U. So Coast Guard installations, Uo SO Naval Air Stations, and
Uo S. Air Force Baseso The distinctions between U, S. Coast Guard Stations, as far as their meteorological observations are concerned, are
made on page 15. U. So Naval Air Stations and Air Force Bases are
equipped and staffed to record the data called for by WBAN (Weather
Bureau-Air Force-Navy) Form 10; hence, for the purposes of this report,
they are placed in the same classification as U. So Weather Bureau First
and Second Order stationso
The distinctions between Uo So Weather Bureau First and Second Order
stations are as follows: First Order stations are staffed by full-time
Civil Service personnel. The stations may or may not operate 24 hours
per day, they may or may not be equipped with full instrumentation,
hence they may or may not take special or synoptic observations. Those
First Order stations that do not operate at all times or take full observations are functionally important in the work of the Bureau; there
are only one or two included in this report. Second Order stations are
staffed by certificated personnel to take full synoptic weather observations; they may or may not be Civil Service personnel. Examples of
Second Order stations are U, So Coast Guard Stations and Civil Aeronautics Administration communications stations at airports otherwise without
Weather Bureau personnel.
A substation of the U. So Weather Bureau is staffed by a volunteer
individual or organization to make at least one observation per day. He
is furnished with equipment to record precipitation and/or temperature
extremes; he may or may not have equipment for measuring additional
weather elements. This type of data source is referred to in this report
as a USWB Cooperative.
The Canadian Meteorological Division Class II station also fits this
description. Canadian Class III stations are equipped only with a rain
gauge; Canadian c stations are equipped only with a sunshine recorder
and/or an anemometer. These stations are referred to in this report,
respectively, as CMD I, CMI)D II, CMD III, and CMD Co
To avoid lengthy repetition of citing the data in the tabulations
that are recorded by USWB First and Second Order stations, CMD Class I
stations, and Uo So Coast Guard, Naval Air, and Air Force stations, the
parameters taken by each group are specified below. In Table I, a page
and paragraph reference is given in the Other column under Meteorological
Data, referring to the following parameters measured at each station:




15


1,  U. S. Weather Bureau First and Second Order stations,
U, So Naval Air Stations, U. S, Air Force Bases, and
Canadian Meteorological Division Class I stations:


ceiling height
sky condition
visibility
present weather
obstructions to vision
sea level pressure
dew point


wind direction
wind speed
air temperature
cloud types*
precipitation
barometric tendency
unusual phenomena


* Canadian Class I stations report cloud types in
tenths of total sky covered; many record sunshine9
2. U. So Coast Guard installations
a. Six-hourly reporting stations (data transmitted to
U. S Weather Bureau every six hours):


sky cover
wind direction
wind speed
visibility
present weather
obstructions to vision
past weather
waves, direction from
wave period
wave height


ice, kind
ice thickness
ice, effect on navigation
ice, change
air temperature
temperature, wet bulb
water temperature
sea level pressure
unusual phenomena


b. Four-hourly reporting stations (data retained at Coast
Guard Headquarters, Washington, D. Co):


wind direction
wind speed
sea level pressure
air temperature
humidity
water temperature


present weather
cloud types
cloud direction
cloud speed
lake state


Fo Second Page
The "second pages" of Table 1 are pertinent only to those installations which obtain hydrographic dataO However, in order to maintain
proper continuity, the serial numbers of all data sourcs, both meteorological and hydrographic, are entered on this page.
The second column indicates the position in the Lake of the raw
water intake. The first number refers to the distance (in feet) that the
intake is located from the shore. The second number, enclosed in parentheses, indicates the depth of the intake below the surface of the water
in feet. This indicated depth must be taken as only an approximate
figure in most cases, due to the difficulty in ascertaining the actual
reference level used in computing the depth,   It is usually the depth
below mean lake level.




16


G. U. S. Public Health Service Specialtud
Certain water treatment plants on Lake Michigan are of particular
interest in connection with a special study presently being conducted by
the U. S. Public Health Service through its Chicago (Region V) offices.
This study was prompted by the difficulty of many Lake Michigan plants
to obtain effective water filtration, due primarily to intense seasonal
plankton blooms. A portion of this study involves the identification of
water quality conditions which contribute to the difficulty of obtaining
proper filtration runs. In this connection, efforts are being made to
standardize observation techniques utilized in the determination of
chemical, physical, and biological characteristics of the raw water
taken in by the various plants.
The study is at present designed to extend through, and possibly
beyond, 1958. During the period of the study, all participating plants
will make the following observations, using a standard methodology prescribed by the U. S. Public Health Service: water temperature, air
temperature, weather conditions, wind direction, wind speed, lake surface current direction, turbidity, pH, alkalinity, chlorine demand, and
chlorine residual. Many of the cooperating plants obtained these observations prior to the initiation of the special study; a few expanded
their operations to include them at least through the present year.
Water treatment plants are involved at the following locations:
Green Bay, Wisconsin; Sheboygan, Wisconsin; Milwaukee, Wisconsin;
Waukegan, Illinois; Evanston, Illinois; Chicago (South District Filtration Plant), Illinois; Gary-Hobart, Indiana; Michigan City, Indiana,
Benton Harbor, Michigan; Holland, Michigan; Grand Rapids, Michigan; and
Muskegon, Michigan. These plants are identified in Table 1 in' the remarks column by the notation UQPi cooperator.




rood


4SLATE IS LT


ORIENTATION CHART
LAKE SUPERIOR
ST MARYS RIVER


PORT


HARBOR


GRAND


0?


MICHIPICOTEN IS
0 CARIBOU IS


5


'C


U IS
SlANNARD ROOK LT


WHITE PNE


MOUNTAIN


STATUTE    MILES
0    10   20   30    40   50   60
---


00'


Figure 2. Orientation Chart, Lake Superior and St. Marys River




Table 1.  Onshore Data Sources


I


I    o


I— _.   j....... i,   i ~   Il  iIII l


LAKE SUPERIOR (beginning at international boundary and proceeding counterclockwise)


I


Meteorolon c n al fData


No.




I. Wind   Air     Pcpno    Other
Di Wind      Air          _
Dir.   Speed  Tempo!-,,,,


3


1 Grand Portage, Minn.
2 Grand Marias, Minn.
3 Grand Marias, Minn.
4 Grand Marias, Minn.
5 Tofte, Minn.
6 Silver Bay, Minn.
7 'ilver Bay, Minn.
8   wo Harbors, Minn.
9   wo Harbors, Minn.
LO  Two Harbors, Minn.


USWB cooperative


USCG Rock of Ages Light
(4 hrly)
USCG North Superior Lifeboat (6 hrly)
USWB cooperative
USWB cooperative
Reserve Mining Co.
E. W. Davis
Water treatment plant
A. A Jensen, Supt.
Water treatment plant
R. W. Gustavson, City
Clerk
SCG Two Harbors Light
4 hrly)
USCG Split Rock Light
(4 hrly)


X
X


X
x


50
16
variable
see data
variable
see data


1955- 1955 -

x


X
x
x -
x
x
1955 -1955 -X
X


X
X


p 15, 2b
p 15, 2b


1955 -K


1955 -X
X


pressure,
1955 -p 15, 2b
p 15, 2b






No.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10


Intake
location
(ft)
680 (50)
525 (52)


HvdronraDnhic Data


_  II C IC' IPL'4~'LC LI*C.Water temp.     Alk.
Raw   Treated


pH    Turb.


1  -
Hard.
1955 -

Bacteria  I
Coli. I Total


a -   ---   --   --.   ~. _.


Remarks


Other
plankton (once/
year), 1956 -lake level 1954
lake -level 1955


1955 -1954 -(X)


1955- 1 1955 -

1956 -1954 -(X)


-D
ko




Period
of Record


I


ON


Mo fpnr f r l n r~p   n "  *


M-rL, "w"V   'CL 'n
rL=L. VA.VLvra.;......

I


No.
11
12
'3
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22


Location


Agency and Contact


Wind
Diro   Speed




I,,


Two Harbors, Minn.
Two Harbors, Minn.
Duluth, Minn.


Duluth,
Duluth,
Duluth,
Duluth,


Minn.
Minn,
Minn.
Minn.


USWB cooperative
U. S. Lake Survey
Water treatment plant
A. V. Biele, Chemist
USCG Lifeboat (4 hrly)
USCG Superior Entry Lifeboat (6 hrly)
USWB First Order
Minnesota Power & Light
Co. Hubbell Carpenter,
Vice Pres. & Ch, Engr.
U. S. Lake Survey
Superior Water, Light,
and Power Co.
W. R. Olsen, Ch. Engr.
USWB cooperative
USWB cooperative
USCG Devils Island Light
(4 hrly)


65
1948 -

X
X


X
X


80


Duluth, Minn,
Superior, Wisc,
Superior, Wisc.
Port Wing, Wisc,
Bayfield, Wisc,


1942 -50
12


K     K
K     K


Air
Tempo
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
K


I


K
K
K


p 15, 2b
p 15, 2a
p 15, 1
weather
p 15, 2b


Pcpn.     Other
X




Hvydrofranhic Data


No,


Intake
location
(ft)


Water tempo
Raw   Treated


Alk.


i:':: __- -       -:,,.,Rae...:i____ _.


pH


Turb. Hard.


Bact
Co1.i


ria
TotalX


- --                                                                                                                               tI I r


_-....  I


11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22


1500 (65)
slip at
shoreline,
12 ft deep


x
K


x


x


x     x


Other
lake level
(cont.)
NH3,    Diss. 02,
Total Fe, BOD,
Plankton (see
remarks)
lake level
(cont.)


Remarks
Plankton studies during
1939, 40, 41


N)
f-a




No.
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34


Location,,


Bayfield, Wisco


Bayfield:
Bayfield,
Bayfie ld,
Madeline
Ashland,, Wisc., Wisc., Wisc,
Is., Wisc,
Wiisc


Period    IMet
Agency and Contact         ~ Record       Wind
__.....         ir. Speed
USCG Outer Island Light        -        I  X      X
(4 hrly)
USCG Mooring (4 hrly)          -X                 X
USCG La Pointe Light           --                 X
(4 hrly)
USWB cooperative                38
USWB cooperative                 14
USWB cooperative             variable;eorological Data


-r


Ashland, Wisc.
Ashland, Wisc.
Ashland, Wisc,
White Pine, Mich.
Ontonagan, Mich,
Ontonagan, Mich.


Water treatment plant
J. A. Snow, Mgr.
Lake Superior District
Power Co., K. S. Austin,
Ch. Engr.
USCG Light (4 hrly)
Water Treatment Plant
(White Pine Copper Co.)
(Escanaba)
USWB cooperative
USWB cooperative


N
N


*..s...


I                -,-. 1




see data
"many
years"
1949 -

Air
Temp.
X
X
55
X
1955 -X


Pcpn.     Other
-- 15, 2b
p 15, 2b


(X)


K
K
58
K
K


p 15, 2b
p 15, 2b
p 15, 2b
cloud cover,
1952


variable
see data
1916 -38


X
1956 -

X




No.
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34


Intake
location
(ft)
2000 (22)
slip on W.
side of
plant
-- (30)


II


I


Hvdrosranhic Data


I               i 4            4              -- 42- -q - -


I. Water temp
Raw   Treated
(X)
(X)
1955 -

Alk.
1954 -

pH


Turb.
1952 -

Hard.    Bacteria
JColi. ITotal
I     ^ * W -


Remarks


Other


I - --


intake water
artificially
heated in
winter


1954 -

1954 -

1952 -

I


color, 1952
fluoride, 1955






I


I


I


Meteon roo rifa1 Data


1


N




I


No.
35
36


Location


I -


Portage, Mich.
Houghton-Keweenaw  Mich


37 Calumet, Mich.
38  Calumet, Mich,




39 Eagle Harbor, Mich.
40 Copper Harbor, Micho
41 Manitou Island, Mich.
42  Keweenaw (Chassell),
Mich.
43 Lower Entry, Mich.
44 Baraga, Micho
45 Baraga, Micho
46  L'Anse, Mich.
47 L'Anse, Mich.


Agency and Contact
USCG Lifeboat (6 hrly)
USCG Houghton-Keweenaw
Light (4 hrly)
Calumet & Heckla water
treatment plant
(Escanaba)
Tamarack water treatment
plant (Escanaba)
USCG Light (6 hrly)
USWB cooperative
USCG Light (4 hrly)
USCG Light (4 hrly)
Uo S. Lake Survey
USWB cooperative
Water treatment plant
(Escanaba)
Water treatment plant
(Escanaba)
USWB cooperative


Period   -
of Record
variable
see data
1955 -16




Wind
Dir. Speed
X X
X     X
1955- 1955 -X     X
X     X


Air
Temp.


X
K
K


I.r....t.^,  A. 0.. W.N.',, kdl.'k.. - iR,.
MnornnlrIflr         I


p 15, 2a
p 15, 2b
p 15, 2a


Pcpn.


Other.. III




16
1955 -variable
see data
20




X
X
K
K


X
X


K
K
K
K


K
K
K


p 15,
p l5 1


2b
2b


X      X
1950 -



Hvdrorranhic Data


No


Intake
location
(ft)


Water temp.
Raw   Created


Alk.


pH


Turb,


&-7     --  -.


Hard.


Bac eria
Coli. Total


Remarks


Other


a...i...  —.... I,, 11


35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47


900 (12)
350 (16)
— (16)
1000 (48)


1955 -X
X
1954 -

1956 -X
1956-   1956 -

1955 -X
X
1955 -

weekly temps
1950-; weekly
coli. 1950 -

weekly
ty and
1950 -

turbidi-'
coliform


lake level
(tri-daily)
color, 1956 -

hourly temps,
but unreliable
thermometer


tn
Lm1




No0        Location
48 Huron Mountain, Micho
49 iStannard Rock, Mich.
i
50 'Marquette, Mich.
51 Marquette, Mich.


52
53


Marquette,
Marquette,


Mich.
Mich.


54 Marquette, Mich.
55  Marquette, Micho
56  Marquette, Mich.


Agency and Contact
USWB cooperative
USCG Light (4 hrly)
USWB First Order
USCG Passage Island
Light (6 hrly)
Uo.S Lake Survey
Northern Micho Coll of
Ed., Geography Depto
Water treatment plant
(Escanaba)
Cliffs Dow Chemical
R, W Jenner, Vice Pres.
and Gen. Mgr,
USCG Lifeboat (4 hrly)
USWB cooperative
Water treatment plant
(Escanaba)
Munising Paper Co.
P. A. Haag, Plant Engr.
USCG Lifeboat (4 hrly)


kPeriod
f Record
87
1"
IiB


X
K


X
x
X


x
XA
X
X


Wind        Air
Dir.   Speed   Temp.


CN..Meteorological Data........,-.....




X


X


variable
see data
1957 -62
1955 -

Pcpn.     Other
p 15, 2b
X    p 15, 1
p 15, 2a


1953 -

Ix


X


57
58
59
60


Munising,
Munising,


Mich.
Mich.


X
X
x


pressure, rel
hum., dew pt.
p 15, 2b
p 15, 2b


X


X


Munising, Micho
jMunising, Mich.


K


K


X




i


No


Intake
location
(ft.)


Hydrographic Data
--  Ir -    -   f


I


I


Water temp.
Raw   Treated


Alk.


Turb.


pH


Hard.


Bacteria
Coli    Total


Remarks


Other


-        ___                            ____ i' -- - 1 -- --  --          _


48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60


1000 (68)
700 (20)
-- (50)
450 (40)


lake level (cont.


^
/


1953 -X
X
X


1955 -

1953 -

1951 -X. thermograp
thermograph




No


Location


I I       Met
Period               -
Agency and Contact    of Record    Wind
Dir. Speed
USCG Light (4 hrly)                 X      X   |
I                      I


----


Air
Temp.


Pcpn.


No
co:eoroloaical Data


Other


-.. -.


- I


61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72


Au Sable (Grand
Marais), Micho
Grand Marais, Mich.
Whitefish Point, Mich.
Whitefish Point, Mich.
Caribou Island, Ont.
Michipicoten Harbor,
Ont.
Heron Bay, Ont.
Marathon, Ont.
Marathon, Ont.
Slate Island, Ont.
Terrace Bay, Ont.
Schreiber, Ont.




USCG Lifeboat (4 hrly)
USWB cooperative
USCG Light (6 hrly)
Canada Dept. of Transport
(lighthouse)
Canadian Hydrographic
Service
CMD II
CMD II
Marathon Paper Co.
Colin MacMillan
Canada Dept. of Transport
(lighthouse)
Kimberly-Clark Paper Co.
J Wade, Tech. Supt.
CMD II


1.r                             Tr.variable
isee data
I
1947 -variable
see data
-0
I
I    \
1947 -variable
see data
variable
see data


A     A


X      X
at least
16     16
X      X


x
X
49
X
X
X
(X)
K


51
X
X
solid
cover
only
40


p 15, 2b
p 15, 2b
p 15, 2a
weather
pressure,
1954
weather
cloud cover)


(X)


(X)




No.
61
iI
I 62
' 63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71


Intake
location
(ft)


I




1600 (30)
1600 (34)


X
hourly


X        X
i/mo. i /mo.


X      X
1/mo. 1 /wk.,S04,


I


Remarks
chem data available from
JF.J. Thomas,
Head, Ind. Waters Sec., Ind
Mins. Div.,
Dept. Mines &
Tech. Surveys,
Ottawa, Ont.


I
I
I
I
I
I
I


1948 -

55-56


1955




72




No


I


C<


Meteorological Data


I                           -   -                                            --


I


Location


Agency and Contact


Period
Record


of


lDir,


Wind
Speed


Air
Temp.


Pcpn.


Other


-,         -         -                                                                      i.


w


R.,,,,,I,

73
74
75
76
77
78


Port Arthur, Onto
Port Arthur, Onto
Fort William, Ont0
Isle Royale, Mich.
Isle Royale, Mich.


Water treatment plant,
Public Utilities Commo,
EI A. Vigars, Mgro
Canadian Hydrographic
Service
CMD I
Mott Iso (USWB cooperative
Washington Harbor (USWB
cooperative)


1938 -

x
II
1:


x


x
x
x
x
x


date of ice
formation;
weather


18
20


x
x
x


p 15, 1


Passage Island, Mich.


USCG Light (6 hrly)


x


x


p 15, 2a




No.
73
174
i75
76
77
78


Intake
location
(ft.)
2400 (25)


Hydrographic Data


Water    tern    I Al


Water temp.      Ako
Raw   ITreated
x    I       I


I — _




pH


Turb. Hard,


Bacteria
Coli. ITotal.h


Remarks


Other
complete chemical
analysis of raw
water made JulyAugust, 1950
water level,
iave height




I


LO


ST. MARYS RIVER


I
No.:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11


I              t


Location


Agency and Contact..,


I ~ ~ ~....


Sault Steo Marie,


Sault
Sault
Sault
Sault
Sault
Sault


Ste.
Ste.
Ste.
Ste.
Ste.
Ste.


Marie,
Marie,
Marie,
Marie,
Marie,
Marie,


Micho Water treatment plant
(Escanaba)
Mich.l USWB First Order
Mich. USCG Lansing Shoal
Light (6 hrly)
Mich. Uo So Lake Survey
Ont. CMD II
Ont. CMD II (Insectary)
Ont.  Canadian Hydrographic
Service
USCG Light (4 hrly)


F Feriod,
variable   1955 -see data i
70        X
--     X


ind
Speed
I
1955 -X
X
X
IC




- -


Air
Temp.......  ' l  I I l l l   m III '....


Pcpn.


Other




I  -.. I


Meteorological Data




I
I
I
I
I
I
IC


I
I
I


(ice thickness)
p 15, 1
p 15, 2a
p 15, 2b
p 15, 2b
p 15, 2b


Point Iroquois


X


(Brimley), Micho
Point Iroquois, Mich.
Little Rapids Cut
(Sault Ste. Marie),
Mich.
Middle Neebish Cut
(Barbeau), Mich.


U. S. Lake
USCG Light
(4 hrly)
USCG Light
(4 hrly)


Survey
Attendant
Attendant


I             I
I             I




I       a - - -~- -— ~..- ~ ~ ~ ---                            r


No.
1
i
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10


Intake
location
(ft)


la.........~d -. --- -..~-,.lJ..-...b,- -.. -a,,~, —,................
Af&.7...,LL,...


Hvdrnornnhic rata


Water temp.
Raw  ITreated


Alk.


pH


Turbo


Hard.


Bacteria
Coli, ITotal


'.                                                                                            I............~.=-.


1300 (42)


(X)


1950 -

1950 -

Other
water level
(cont.)
water level
(cont.)
water level
(cont.)


I Remarks
I      I  I
coli. on daily
basis only
since 1957
Pperiod of record not en'tirely ascertained


11




No.
12
13
14
15
16


Period
of Record


Location


Agency and Contact


Me
Wind
Dir,   Speed
I            I~


A-  i 1 r 1 CT.. "*, r, ___


-I.-    -.  i- i


Dunbar,
Detour,
Detour,
Detour,
Detour,


Mich,
Mich.
Micho
Micho
Mich.


USWB cooperative
USCG Light (4 hrly)
USCG Light Attendant
(4 hrly)
USWB cooperative
Uo So Lake Survey


teoroloeical Data


$

16


Air
Tempo
X
X
X
'C
'C
'C




X
X.'r. C


X
X


Pcpno
X
'C
'C


Other
p 15, 2b
p 15, 2b


I   -- ---                             -   -


28




No


I


Intake
location
(ft)


Water tempo
Raw Lreated


Hvdrozranhic Dathan


*... A..


a


Alk0     pH    Turb.   Hard
=-S " S,


-~ ----. --    --—...               c. e  1......I


Bacteria
Coli. LTotal


Remarks


12
13
14
15
16


Other
water level
(cont.)


Ln








___ _~


8800'                         87-00'86e0od                                               Br
MANISTIUE           '
GLADSTONE                      SEUL CHOIX PT     WHITE SVOAL LT
S3HOE
GLADSTONE               )
ESCANABA                                GULL IS0      /    IS
FAYETTE SACK BAY     ^R          S              CRSS VILLAGE
BEAVER IS,
MINNEAPOLIS SHOAL
ST MARTIN ISO3  POVERTY IS                                   V    HAFW BO
S*                               r s FOX IS.                       OS
/  P        WASHINGTON IS                                              TOSKEY
PLUM IS *                                                   GHARLEVOIX
PIL                             GRAND TRAVERSE LT
CHAMBERS
MARINETTE                                       MANITOU/MAT              OI )
S. }b MANITOU                              SHOAL L                                             O
IS
OCONTO.5                                                        GLEN
HEW  PT       RGEON  BAY
PT BE ISIE LTT —                   SE CITY
/  FRANKFORT
ALGOMA                                ELBERTA
GREEN BAY                /
KEWAUNEE
RAWLEY PT                                            STEE
TWO RWER
MANITOWOC
B  SABLE PT                              ORIENTATION      CHART           -    440'
LUDINGTON
LAKE     MICHIGAN
SHEBOYGAN                                           PENTWATER
STATUTE MILES
A                K         E                                   10    20    30     40    50
PORT WASHINGTON
MUSKEGON
MUSKEGON       HTS
-  43'00'


37


-   42'00'


--


Figure 3. Orientation Chart, Lake Michigan




O3
00


LAKE MICHIGAN (beginning on the north shore at the Straits of Mackinac and proceeding counterclockwise)


-....


I-.                      --.......r


I


No o      Location
1 Brevort, Micho
2 Port Inland, Micho
3  Seul Choix Point
(Gulliver), Mich.
4 IManistique, Mich,
5 'Manistique, Micho
6 Fayette Sack Bay, Mich.
7 Gladstone, Micho
8 jEscanaba, Mich.
9 Escanaba, Mich.
10 Escanaba, Mich.




Agency and Contact


Period
of Record


I           [ -_. -i   I -


'USWB
USWB
USCG


cooperative
cooperative
Light (4 hrly)


5
5


USWB cooperative
USCG Light (4 hrly)
USWB cooperative
Water treatment plant
(Escanaba)
USWB First Order
USCG Light (4 hrly)
Water treatment plant
(Escanaba)
USCG Light (4 hrly)
Water treatment plant
USCG Light (4 hrly)


22
38
variable
see data
87
variable
see data
variable
see data




Wind
Diro   Speed


Air
Tpmn




L


_.


+1 - rU   -.................,,


x


Meteorological Data




T                            i t


X


X


X


(X)


Pcpno


Other


x
x
x
x
1935 -X
X
1946 -X
ca
1880 -

x
x
x
X
X
ca
1880 -

XX
1953 -X
ca
1880 -

x
1957 -X


p 15, 2b
p 15, 2b
p 15, 1
p 15, 2b
p 15, 2b
ice formation
& dissipation
ca 1880 -p 15, 2b


11
12


Minneapolis Shoal, Mich,
Menominee, Micho


13 IMenominee, Mich.


X


X




I


~                                                                                                  ~,                                                                                     l                                                                                                                                                                                                                 I       I


Intake  i
No   location i
(ft)  i


Hydrographic Data


Lc__..., --- _L; _....___.._-, — c _3 _.._- ___.. — ___ ___ -_ - c _.I


Water temp.
Raw Treated


IL


1   l
2   t
3


I


4


i
i!


5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13


Alk.
1953 -1951 -

pH
1953 -1945 -

J Turb
I!
I
1954 -1945 -

Hard.
1953 -Q)


Bacteria
Coi I aa     Io.
Coli.      1
I.....                            I


Other


Remarks


1500 (35)
-- ( —)
conflicting info.


1955 -1953 -1945 -

1954 -1948 -1945 -

color, 1954 -odor, 1948-;
color, 1948 -color, 1945 -

1948 -1945 -

Lo




Noo
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25


[


Location


Agency and Contact


Period
of Record


----   v, F-  - ---- ---- A.-A.....


Meteoroloeical Data


o


Wind
Dir.   Speed


I


Air
TemP n


A


Pcpn.


---     ----


Other


i                  I I                       I   - -— r I     I             I


Marinette, Wisc.
Marinette, Wisce.Oconto, Wisc
'Green Bay, Wisce
Green Bay, Wisc,
Green Bay, Wisc.
Green Bay, Wise.
Sherwood Point
(Sturgeon Bay), Wisec
Chambers Island
(Fish Creek), Wisce
Plum Island, Wisc
(c/o Washington Is.)
Pilot Island (Washington Is.), Wisco
St. Martin Island
(Washington Is,), Wisc


-u


Water treatment plant
USWB cooperative
USWB cooperative
Water treatment plant
Ao Marx, Chemist
USCG Light (4 hrly)
USCG Light Attendant
(4 hrly)
U, So Lake Survey
USCG Light (4 hrly)
USCG Light (4 hrly)
USCG Lifeboat (4 hrly)
USCG Light (4 hrly)
USCG Light (4 hrly)




40
variable
see data
1957 -- e


I   I                  a


x
x
K


K
K
K


K
69
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K


4
48


weather
p 15, 2b
p 15, 2b


K
K
K
K
K


K
K
K
K
K


p
p
p
p
p


15,
15,
15,
15,
15,


2b
2b
2b
2b
2b




Hvdroeraphic Data


No.


Intake
location
(ft)


Water temp.
Raw    Treated


I.         i

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25


Alk.   pH
X     X


-  * —  -----,               I


Turb.


-.       1


Hard.




Bacteria
Coli. I Total


6000 (47)


X


X


X


X


X


Other
lake level
(cont.)


Remarks
intake in L.
Michigan approxs  3 mi N
of Kewaunee;
USPH cooperator           I




Noo


Location


Agency and Contact


Meteorological Data


Period
of Record


_'


ai                                                                                                                           i/


Wind       Air
Diro Speed Tempo


4^
'Is


Pcpno


Other


26 'Poverty Iso (Washington
Is.), Wisco
27 'Washington Is,, Wisco
28 'Sturgeon Bay, Wisco
29  Sturgeon Bay, Wisc,
30 Sturgeon Bay, Wisc.
31  Algoma, Wisc.
32 Kewaunee, Wisc.
33  Kewaunee, Wise.
34 Rawley Point (Two
Rivers), Wisc,
35 Two Rivers, Wisco
36  Two Rivers, Wise,
37 Manitowoc, Wisec
38  Janitowoc, Wisc,


I.                                                                                               I..


---... —.


W..


I.


USCG Light (4 hrly)


X


x     x


p 15, 2b


USWB cooperative
USWB cooperative
USCG Lifeboat (4 hrly)
U, S. Lake Survey
USCG Light (4 hrly)
USWB cooperative
USCG Light (4 hrly)
USCG Light (4 hrly)
Water treatment plant
(USWB cooperative)
USCG Lifeboat (4 hrly)
USCG Light (4 hrly)
USWB cooperative


14
variable
see data


X
61


X


X


46


X


X


X
X


X
X


j X
X
X, x
8
X
X
75


X
54
X
8
96


p 15, 2b


p 15,
p 15,
p 15,


2b
2b
2b


variable
see data
variable
see data


X
X


X
X


p 15, 2b
p 15, 2b


I




Hydrographic Data


No0


Intake
location
(ft)


Water temp.
Raw   ITreated


Alk.


-                          -— 1  ' ---~ — ~-             -----    -. -— ' v                                              1 I      -                               -


pH


Turb


Hard.


I Bacteria
Coli   I Total


Remarks


Other


I     -  N  v..f  l 1


Ml            Jl.  -   II -    -   II


I....


-........


26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37


lake level
(conto)


6123 (33)


1933-1


1933 -

1933- 1 1933 -

38


(
"t   '




4>
4>


No


Location


Agency and Contact


Period
of Record...Meteorological Data
Wind       Air              Qhe
Dir.  Speed   Temp..
X       X ' X


-M  i                              a —I ----~-~~~-   17- 9 — M —,        i             s i ---. --— Rr~r   T I__-C-.  - - _I


39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50


Sheboygasn Wisco
Sheboygan, Wisc
Sheboygan, Wisc
Port Washington,
Port Washington,
Port Washington,
Milwaukee, Wisc


Water treatment plant
C. Blabaum, Plant Supto


USCG
USWB


Lifeboat (4 hrly)
cooperative


Wisc.
Wisc.


Milwaukee, Wisco
Milwaukee, Wisc
Milwaukee, Wisco
Milwaukee, Wisco
lCudahy, Wisec
il


Water treatment plant
USCG Light (4 hrly)
USWB cooperative
Water treatment plant
T. E. Dolan, Chemist
USWB cooperative
USCG Lifeboat (6 hrly)
USWB First Order City
U. So Lake Survey
Water treatment plant
J, J. Tiry, Director
Pub. Works


1931 -variable
see data
1949 -19
variable
see data
7
84
1954 -

X


X
K
K


X


weather, lake
current diro
during 1958
lp 15, 2b


X
62
X
1958


X


'p 15, 2b
X   '
I*eather, lake
current dir.
1958


1958   1958


60


X
X
K
K


X
X


X
X
X


X


p 15,
'p  15,
X!p1


2a
1


X


X


X


I




No.
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50


Intake
location
(ft)
5000 (-)
1800 (-)


Hydrographic Data


- Ia — --  -


3450 (32)
6500 (67)
2400 (24)


Water tempr
Raw   'rreaLed
x
x
x!
i       i
X


Alk.


pH


Turb,


Hard.


Bacteria
Coli. ITotal


I              ---,  - - - - I


X
x
X
X
X


x
x
x
x


x
x
x
x


Other


Remarks
5000 ft intake:used most
[USPH cooperai tor
USPH cooperator


x
x
x


x
x
x


plankton
lake level
(cont.)




No.


Period
of Record




Meteorological Data....


Mete oroic     - D a


Location


Agency and Contact


Wind
Diro Speed


Air
Temn-!


Pcpn.


I  I

-... r


rv

-


51
52
53
54
55
56
57 -76
77


Wind Point, Wisc.
Racine, Wisc
Racine, Wisce
Kenosha, Wisco
Kenosha, Wisc,
Waukegan, Ill
Waukegan, Ill.
Waukegan, 11l.
Waukegan, Ill.
Waukegan, I11.
Highland Park, ll.


USCG Light (4 hrly)
Water treatment plant
Go H. Ruston, Mgr.
USWB cooperative
USCG Lifeboat (4 hrly)
USWB cooperative
North Shore Sanitary
Dist., R. E. Anderson,
Chem-Engr.
(a) Waukegan Disposal
Plant
(b) 20 obs. pts. between
Wisc. & Cook Co.,
Illo, borders
Water treatment plant
Ho C. Domke, Supt.
USWB cooperative
USCG Light (4 hrly)
Water treatment plant


1930 -variable
see data
16
variable
see data
1948 -1928 -35
1929 -

X
X


X


x


X


X


1947 -

65
X
X
X
X
K


62
X
liquid
1938-;
solid
1947 -1952
X


Other
p 15, 2b
p 15, 2b
cloud cover
1947-48
weather, lake
condition
atmos, cond,
lake level
p 15, 2b
atmos. cond.


X


X


X


X


78
79
80


X


X




No.
51
52
53
54
55
56
57 -76
77
78
79
80


Intake
location
(ft)
3960 (40)
-- (.-)
3400 (25)
2000 (25;


Water temp.
I Raw   rreated
X
X
xl


Hydrographic
Turb. Hard.


Data
Bacteria   _{
Coli. ITotal        ther


I






x
x
x


x
x
x
x


x
x
x
x


X    X


X
X


)
)


x
x




I


I


Remarks


locations of
obs. pts. obtainable from
R. E. Anderso
jSPH cooperator


X


I




I


Agency and Contact


Location


I
i        Meteorological Data
Period        7 Wind
of Record.nd                   Pcpn.
Speed        - p.
--        X      X        X            p
1913-      X      X        X       X


aL


4>
00


Other
15, 2b


81
82
83
84
85


Wilmette,
Evanston,,Evanston,
Chicago,
Chicago,


111.
Ill.
111.
Ill.
Ill.


86 Chicago, Ill.
87 Chicago, Ill.
88  Chicago, Ill.
89  Chicago, I11.


USCG Lifeboat (4 hrly)
Water treatment plant
H. R. Frye, Supt.
USWB cooperative
USWB First Order City
Chicago Univ.
USWB cooperative
Loyola Univ.
USWB cooperative
Chicago Lakeview Pump,
(USWB cooperative)
Chicago Sanitary Dist.
Off. (USWB cooperative)
South Dist. Filtration
Pit. (USWB cooperative)
J. R. Baylis, Engr. of
Water Purification
USCG Lifeboat (4 hrly)
U. S. Lake Survey
IUSCG Lifeboat (4 hrly)


17
88
87
25
25


X
X


X
X


K
K
K


K
K
K
K


5ti.


K
K


p 15, 1
p 15, 2b
p 15, 2b


32
1945 -

K     K
K     K
K     K


K
K


X


90
91
92


Chicago, Ill.
Chicago, 11l. -
Jackson Park
(Chicago), Ill.


X


I




No


Intake
location
(ft)


-,,


I ___ _ Iif__         I       I              r


Water temp.
Raw   Treated


Hydrographic Data


Alk.


pH


Turb.


Hard,


Bacteria
Colil ITotal


Other


--                 4.           i.. ----  I ---  X  --  -.                 --                             I


81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92


5690 (16)
-- ( —)


x
K


x
K


K
K


x
K


K
K


K
K


plankton
plankton, lake
level




1
t


Remarks


JSPH coopera-:or


I


USPH cooperator




No


Location


Agency and Contact


Period
of Record


_-  _ _ _ _ _ __    i


93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103


South Chicago, Ill.
Hammond, Ind.
Whiting, Indo
Whiting, Indo
Indiana Harbor, Ind.
Gary, Ind.
Gary, Ind.
(Gary-Hobart)
Gary, Ind.
Gary, Ind.
Ogden Dunes, Ind.
Michigan City, Ind.


USCG Lifeboat (4 hrly)
Water treatment plant
Mo Papach, Acto Supto
USWB cooperative
Water treatment plant
M, H. Abraham, Supt.
USCG Light (4 hrly)
USWB cooperative
Water treatment plant
Ho Lo Plowman, Jr.,
Ch. Chem.
Uo So Steel; T. Wo Hunter, Gen. Supt.; Do T.
Seaman, Div. Supt. of
Power & Fuel
Northern Ind. Public
Serv. Co., D. H. Mitchell
Plant, E. B. Heise, Mgr.
Electric Production
USWB cooperative
Water treatment plant
D. Ungareit, P1. Supt.


1936 -48
1955 -22
1954 -variable
see data
Dec. 1956 -7
1935 -

I




Meteorological Data


Wind
Dir. Speed


Air
Tem o.


On
0




----- - --


i  -- t  -- I   I   r


-.-               -     -


X
X


X
X


X
XC


X




Pcpn,


Other


X


'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'


X
X
X
'C
'C
'C


p 15, 2b
visibility
p 15, 2b
atmos. cond.


X


X


X




No.
93. '94!
95
96


I
I
i
i
I
i


Intake
location
(ft)
1)5000(24)
2)1934(17)
3)1400(15)


Hydrographic Data


- - -— ' ---- - — - I

Water tempo
Raw  [Treated


Alk.


pH


Turbo


Hard.


Bacteria
Colio Total


Other


Remarks


-ii —        - ----                    --- -— I  ---- -- -i     -- t i


i1696 (16)


97


98 1


x
x
x
1950 -X
X


x
x
x


x
x
x


x
x
x
x


x
x
x


odor; lake surface
plankton, color,
dor
Ca, Mg, non-C03
salts, 1953 -unspecified chem.
anal.;water level


99
100
101
102
103


ca 6000
(35-38)
1) 2900
(6-16)
2) 100 (-)
shoreline
(6)
3000 (35)


X
1953 -

x
x


intakes: 1)
used all yr;
2) & 3) used
May-Sept.
USPH cooperator
2 intakes at
same location;
24" & 42"diam.
USPH cooperator


%n
1-"




No.


Location


Agency and Contact


Period
of Record


-                                        E.!                     9.'


104 JMichigan City, Indo


105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114


Michigan City, Ind.
St. Joseph, Mich,
St. Joseph, Mich.
Benton Harbor, Mich,
Benton Harbor, Mich.
Pilgrim Haven, Mich,
South Haven, Mich.
South Haven, Mich,


Northern Ind. Public
Serv. Co., Michigan City
Plant; E. B. Heise, Mgr.
Electric Production
USCG Lifeboat (4 hrly)
Water treatment plant
(Lansing)
USCG Lifeboat (6 hrly)
Water treatment plant
(Lansing)
USWB cooperative
C. W, Shinn
USCG Lifeboat (6 hrly)
Water treatment plant
(Lansing)
USWB cooperative
Municipal power plant
Roy Ewers, Mgr.
Water treatment plant
(Lansing)


1931 -1952 -1951 -75
3
1926 -63
1915 -1957 -

I


x


x


-   0


xl


Wind
Dir. Speed


X
X


x
x
oC
IC


-  "  "'


Air
Temp.
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
IC
IC
IC
IC
IC


Meteorological Data


Pcpn.
X
IC
IC


p 15, 2b
p 15, 2a
pressure
p 15, 2a
pressure


I


Other


I
I
I


X
X


South
South


Haven,
Haven,


Mich.
Mich.


115 Holland, Mich.


X


X




Intake
No. location
(ft)
104 shoreline
(14)
105
106   1500 (25)


Data


Remarks


107
108
1 09
110


111


3500 (28)
5600 (35)
4360
(46-50)


X
x
x
x
X
X
X


x


x


unspecified chem.
anal., water
level


x


x    I x


x


x


x


X    odor


odor




I
i
I
IUSPH cooperaI tor
USPH cooperator
tor


112
113
114
115


x   x


x


x


x


color, odor


X


X


X


X


x


plankton, odor,
C03, diss. C02,
HC03


Ln
(A)




No,


Meteorological Data


Location


Agency and Contact


Period
of Record


1 -- '


Wind
Dir.   Speed


Air
Temp.


Pcpn.


Other


i                              - I'- -' - *  - 1- -  -


116 Holland, Mich.
117 Grand Rapids, Mich.
118  Grand Haven, Mich.
119 Grand Haven, Mich,
120,Grand Haven, Mich.
21 iMuskegon Heights, Mich.
22 Muskegon, Mich.
23  Muskegon, Mich.
24 Muskegon, Mich.
125;Pentwater, Mich.
126 iLudington, Mich.


USCG Moorings (4 hrly)
Water treatment plant
(Lansing)
USCG Lifeboat (4 hrly)
USWB cooperative
USWB cooperative
Water treatment plant
(Lansing)
Water treatment plant
(Lansing)
USWB First Order
USCG Lifeboat (6 hrly)
USCG Moorings (4 hrly)
Water treatment plant
(Lansing)
USWB cooperative
USCG Lifeboat (4 hrly)
USWB cooperative


X


x. -0
1912 -16
88
1941 -1937 -62


I
I
I
i
i


X


X


X


x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x


K
K
K
K


x
K


K
K
K
K
K


p 15, 2b
p 15, 2b
p 15, 1
p 15, 2a
p 15, 2b
weather
p 15, 2b


1954 -

127
128
129


Ludington,
Ludington,
Ludington,


Mich.
Mich.
Mich.


62


X


X


I




No


Intake
location
(ft)


--- - -                                                                                                                 --


Water tempo
tRaw ITreated


Turb.


Hydrographic Data


Hard.


Alko


PH


Bacteria
Coli. I Toal


Other


Remarks. ----.1... 1                                                     f..... - -  1


116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129


6100 (57)
4600 (42)
7000 (50)
2600 (45)


x
x
K


K
K
K


K
K
K


K


K
K
K
K


K
K


K
K
K
K


K
K
K


plankton, Mg,
color


C1,


USPH cooperator
USPH cooperatorTPT
tor


color, odor
F1, C, c lcnr
odor


Ln
Ln




!
1


Meteorological Data


%n
\  <^


No,


Location


Agency and Contact


Period
of Record


I                                                                                i                            I,


I I


Diro


Wind
Speed


Air
Temp.


Pcpn,


Other


I        - =.,1.....,,.,   -


*  - -- -....I.... L; i I ", '-".........


130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142


Ludington, Mich.
Big Sable Point
(Ludington), Mich.
Manistee, Micho
Manistee, Mich.
Elberta, Mich.
Frankfort, Micho
Point Betsie, Mich.
Glen Arbor, Micho
South Manitou Is,,
Mich.
North Manitou Is,,
Mich.
North Manitou Is,,
Mich.
North Manitou Shoals
(Leland), Mich.
Grand Traverse
(Northport), Mich.


U. S. Lake Survey
USCG Light (4 hrly)


x


X


USWB
USCG
USWB
USCG
USCG
USWB
USCG


cooperative
Lifeboat (4 hrly)
cooperative
Lifeboat (4 hrly)
Light (6 hrly)
cooperative
Light (6 hrly)


63
56


X


X


X
x


X
X


4


N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N


N
N
N
N


p 15, 2b


X


X


p 15, 2b


X


USWB cooperative
USWB cooperative
USCG Light (4 hrly)


4


p 15, 2b
p 15, 2a
p 15, 2a
p 15, 2b
p 15, 2b


X
X


X
X


USCG


Light (4 hrly)




No.


Intake
location
(ft)


Hydrographic Data


Water tempo
Raw    Treated


Other


Alk.


pH


Turbo Hard.


Bacteria
Coli     Total


Remarks


--      - i-   '    M.....   ___,. I- L J_______  I I


130
131
132
33
34
35
36
137
38
39
40
41


lake level
(conto)


142




Period
of Record


Meteorological Data


Lo
00


i                                              I                              T —  i  - -  - -.-          L I  I   i I


No.


Location


I


Agency and Contact


Dir.


Wind
Speed


Air
Temp.


Pcpn


Other


Wt               trleatmen                        I                              -  +         4


143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155


Traverse City, Mich.
Traverse City, Mich.
Traverse City, Mich.
Charlevoix, Mich.
Charlevoix, Mich.
Petoskey, Mich.
Petoskey, Mich.
Little Traverse (Harbor
Springs), Mich.
Cross Village, Mich.
White Shoal (Cross
Village), Mich.
Lansing Shoal, Mich.
Grays Reef (Charlevoix), Mich.
Ile Aux Galets
(Charlevoix), Mich.


Water treatment plant
(Lansing)
USWB Second Order CAA AP
Naval Air Station
USCG Lifeboat (4 hrly)
USWB cooperative
Penn-Dixie Portland Cement Co., G. Davis, Supt.
USWB cooperative
USCG Light (4 hrly)


1954 -64
1942-1945
71


X
X
X


X
X
x


6
5


X


X


x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
'C


'
'C
'
'
'C


p 15, 1
p 15, 1
p 15, 2b
p 15, 2b
p 15, 2b


USWB
USCG
USCG
USCG
USCG
USCG


cooperative
Light (4 hrly)
Light (6 hrly)
Light (4 hrly)
Light (4 hrly)


X


'
'
'


'
'
'
'


p
p


15,
15,


2a
2b


p 15, 2b




Intake


No
143
144
145
146
i
147
148
1149
150
151
152
153
154
155


(ft)
1700 (34)
50 (6)


I                      Hydrographic Data
|       Water teno  j                           Bacteria
S    gi   lko9    pH     Turb. Hard    Coli   Total         Other
X                              x    I         X
II
l  l         l
I


Remarks


I I


X


It




Noo


Location


Agency and Contact


Period
3f Record


11[


ON
0
cs


Meteorological Data


Meteoroloica    Data


Wind
Diro   SPeed


Air
TImn-r


Pcpn.


Other


Dir                                See   Tmn -  1  1
t -                           W4~ZCA


156
157
158
159
160
161


Beaver Is o, Mich.
Beaver Is., Mich.
Beaver Is., Mich.
Gull Is., Mich.
South Fox Is., Mich,
Shoe Island, Mich.


USCG
USCG
USWB
USCG
USCG
USWB


Light (4 hrly)
Lifeboat (4 hrly)
cooperative
Light (4 hrly)
Light (4 hrly)
cooperative




x
x
I
'C
'C


x
x
x
'C


x
x
'C
x
x
'C
'C


p
p


15, 2b
15, 2b


X


p 15,
p 15,


2b
2b




Noo


Hvdrograohic Data


Intake
location
(ft)


--   ---   ---- -  - ---- --- -- -I, ---  --   - --  --


Water tempo
Raw  ITreatepd


11


Remarks


Alk.


pH


Turbo


Hardo


Bacteria
Cnl i _ Tnotal


Other


_I_ --      i --- -- - -. I.I  *     U...l. I.             I I.


156
157
158
159
160
161






I




84"00'                     8300'


82'00o


G E O R G I A N


*THUNDER BAY


B A Y


L    A     K     E


SOUTHAMPTON


H    U     R    O     N


ORIENTATION CHART
LAKE   HURON


GODERICH


FORT


STATUTE   MILES
Q    19    20    30   4,0   50    60


-43*00'




Figure 4.


Orientation Chart, Lake Huron




LAKE HURON (starting at international boundary at False Detour Passage and proceeding counterclockwise)


0'
4>




I-   I


I                                                                                                           I                                                                                                                    I


No.


Location


Agency and Contact


Period
of Record


L


I


Wind
Dir. Speed


Air
Temp.


Pcpn.


I I


Meteorological Data


-— l


I.. -


i                            It                             t           i i -           i    --- - - -A- -- -  i


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12


Martin Reef, Mich.
St. Ignace, Mich.
Mackinac Is,, Mich.


Mackinac Is,, Mich.
Mackinaw City, Mich.
Mackinaw City, Mich.
Chebpygan, Mich.
Cheboygan, Mich,
Poe Reef (Cheboygan),
Mich.
Spectacle Reef (Cheboygan), Micho
Forty Mile Point
(Rogers City), Mich.
Rogers City, Mich.


USCG Light (4 hrly)
Water treatment plant
(Escanaba)
Water treatment plant
(Escanaba)
USCG Lifeboat (4 hrly)
USWB cooperative
U. S. Lake Survey
USCG Light (4 hrly)
I
USWB cooperative
USCG Light (4 hrly)
USCG Light (4 hrly)
USCG Light (4 hrly)
USWB cooperative


variable
see data
variable
see data
68


69




x
1951 -

x


X
X


X
X


K     K
K     K
K     K
K     K


K
K
K
K
K
K
K


K
K
K


1956
1956 -

Other
p 15, 2b
weather
(recent data)
p 15, 2b
p 15, 2b
p 15, 2b
p 15, 2b
p 15, 2b
p 15, 2b     I


7




1


- -- --- - -- -- ------ --


_ -.... i  ' -


No.
2
3
4
5
6


Intake
location
(ft)


Hydrographic Data. I.. I  I.


Water temp.
Raw   Treated


Alk.


pH


Turb.


Hard.


Bacteria
Coli. Total


Other


Remarks


i                                                            - --  -    A..                                                                               -             -9              -


1951 -

before
1955: 225
(13)
since
1955: 480
(20)
-- ( —)


1952 -

1952 -1957 -

1950 -1946 -VI


temps prior
to 1951 obs.
with unreliable thermometer


lake level (cont.t


7
8
9
10
11
12


O0
ktn




I
i


I


No.


Location


I


Agency and Contact




Period
of Record


_  _ _I  _             1                    +        i


13 Rogers City, Mich.
14 Presque Isle, Mich.
15 Middle Is. (Alpena),
Mich.
16 Thunder Bay Is. (Alpena), Mich.
17 Alpena, Mich.
18  Alpena, Mich
18 'Alpena, Mich.


i


I --- —

I




Micho Limestone and Chem.
Div,, U.S. Steel
Do T. Van Zandt, Mgr.
USCG Light (4 hrly)
USCG Light (4 hrly)
USCG Light (6 hrly)
USWB First Order
Water treatment plant
(Lansing)
USCG Light (4 hrly)
USWB cooperative
USWB cooperative
USCG Tawas Point Lifeboat
(6 hrly)
Water treatment plant
(Lansing)
Dow Chemical Co.
MN Whiting, Mgr.,
Service Depts.




"Several
years"
86
1945 -79
64


I


I!! I


Wind       Air
Speed    Temp.


T       '       ----  -- I'


I —


Meteorological Data


a'


Pcpn.




Dir,


Other


X
X


x
x


x     x


X
X


X


x
x
x
x
x
X
X
X
X


19
20
21
22


Alpena, Mich.
Harrisville, Mich.
East Tawas, Mich.
Tawas City, Mich.




23  Saginaw-Midland intake,
Mich.
24.Iidland, Mich.




I


x     x
x     x
X     X


1948 -1949 -

x
x
X
X


p 15, 2b
p 15, 2b
p 15, 2a
p 15, 1
p 15, 2b
p 15, 2a
rel. humid.




No.


Intake
location
(ft).=  =- -7 -_  ___  __ _____


Water temp.
Raw   Treated


Alk.


Hvdroaranhic Data


pH


Turb.


Bacteria
Hard....  Tota
Coli.   Total


Remarks


Other


i                  ii.                  -i      -        I  -  -   i —        ---         +4.i i


13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24


shoreline
(6)
2000 (10)
Whitestone
Pt., north
shore Saginaw Bay;
(40)
(see remarks)


x


X


x
x
x


x
Ko


x
K
x


x
x
x


x
x


'chemical anal."
of raw water made
once per year
color
free CO2, Mg, C1,
color
C1, SO4, Si, Na


K
K


x


same intake as
Saginaw-Midland


'-j




Metenoron noical nDat


C0
00


No o


Location


Agency and Contact


Period
of Record


-   =- -A, ' -  " -C


Wind
Dir.   Speed


a


Air
Temp.


I


Pcpn. I


Other


i " -                                                   n  - -          "-                                                                                                  --..


25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37


Pinconning, Mich.
Bay City, Mich.


Bay City,
Bay City,


Mich.
Mich.


Bay City, Mich.
Sebewaing, Mich,
Harbor Beach, Mich.
Harbor Beach, Mich.
Harbor Beach, Mich.
Lakeport, Mich.
Fort Gratiot, Mich.
Point Edward, Ontario
Goderich, Ontario


Water treatment plant
(Lansing)
Water treatment plant
(Lansing)
USWB cooperative
USCG Saginaw River Range
Light (6 hrly)
U. S. Lake Survey
USWB cooperative
Water treatment plant
(Lansing)
U. S. Lake Survey
USCG Lifeboat (4 hrly)
U. S. Lake Survey
U. S. Lake Survey
Canadian Hydrographic
Service
CMD II


1948 -1925 -63


x


X


2
1937 -variable
see data


K
K
K
(K)


X
X


x
I
p 15, 2a
X


X


X


p 15, 2b


57




No.


Intake
location
(ft)?        a          R -


Water tem.
Raw  ITreated


Alk.


pH


Hydrographic Data


Turb.


Hard.  Bacteria
Coli. ITotal


Remarks


Other


I


1    I                                               -                                                                - - - -   -I                                                                                        -..


I


25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37


5400 (6)
18480 (19)
2600 (14)


x
x


x
x
y
A 1


X
X


X
X


X
xr


X


x;X
Ai


C 1, odor
Mg, C1, free CO2,
color, odor
lake level (cont.
color, odor
lake level (cont.


x


V


X


lake level
lake level
lake level


(cont.c
(cont.:
(cont.


0O
'.O




No.


Location


Agency and Contact


Period
)f Record


Wind
m) r    C' nAMd


I


Meteorological Data
Air     Pc, e  T"       Pcpn.


Other


0i
0


38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50! I1                      I                                         ir I  e  a  - cu -  t: e
Oh
I- -                Canadian


Goderich, Ontario
Southampton, Ontario
Tobermory, Ontario
Wiarton, Ontario
Owen Sound, Ontario


Canadian
Service
CMD II


Hydrographic


CMD II
CMD I
CMD I I


Collingwood,
Collingwood,


Ontario
Ontario


Midland, Ontario
Victoria Harbor, Ont.
Waubaushene, Ontario
Parry Sound, Ontario
Kagawong, Ontario
Gore Bay, Ontario


CMD II
Canadian
Service
CMD III
CMD III
CMD II
CMD II


variable
see data
variable
see data
variable
see data
variable
see data


Hydrographic


at least
36      36
X      X
at least
36      36


(X)
(X)
x
(X)
'
x
('C)
'
'


X


74
35
6
66


IP 15, 1


X
X
X
75
X
X


CMD
CMD


II
I


I


X


p 15, 1




No.
i
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50


Intake   I
location
(ft)     Raw,,,a,,.. --


Hydrographic Data


--...


I


-' Alk.
Treated
11! - A.


Turb.


Hard.


PH


Bacteria          O    r
Coli. ITotal


Remarks
I


i                  ___ _. I


-.-..- -. —..


lake level (cont.
lake level (cont.




-.)


Location


Agency and Contact


Gore Bay, Ontario
Blind River, Ontario
Thessalon, Ontario


CMD II
CMD II
Canadian Hydrographic
Service


j variable
see data
variable
see data




No.


Intake
location
(ft)


Hydrographic Data


-      i   -  -f I-   - -  I


Water temp.
Raw   TTreated


Alk.


pH


Turb.


Hard.


Bacteria
Coli. i Total


Remarks


Other


i                                                   i           i                                               I                           I --  — t-  i  i


51
52
53


lake level (cont.








80s00'


PORT


MOUNT CLEMENS ~
ST GLAIRA


\ E,C:?
16


ORIENTATION CHART


EAST


ST CLAIR RIVER - LAKE ST CLAIR-DETROIT RIVER


LAKE ERIE


OCLEVELAND


NIAGARA RIVER


STATUTE  MLES
0      10     20     30     40     50


-n


Figure 5.


Orientation Chart, Lake Erie (including St. Clair River,
Lake St. Clair, Detroit River, and Niagara River)




I STo CLAIR RIVER-LAKE STo CLAIR-DETROIT RIVER (starting at the southern extreme of Lake Huron)


-.j


'I                       I.I.


u I. -P-...


Period
of Record


1T


Meteorological Data...... $ 3 7' — I II


No,


Location


Agency and Contact


Wind
Dir.


Air
Temp.


Pcpn.


Other


Speed




_  -  -  -  - ---  -i- - ------ ------— W-  m —e-  -p - la- - -  -...  -


i -- -i


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11


Port Huron, Mich.
Port Huron, Mich.
Port Huron, Mich.
Sarnia, Ontario
Marysville, Mich.
St. Clair, Mich.
Roberts Landing, Mich.
Port Lambton, Ontario
Algonac, Mich.
Harsens Is., Mich.
Mt. Clemens, Mich.


Water treatment plant
(Lansing)
U. So Lake Survey
USCG Lifeboat (6 hrly)
Polymer Corp,, Ltd.
I. Co Rush, Mgr., Tech.
Div.
Detroit Edison Plant
W. W. Williams, Mgr. of
Operations, Detroit
Detroit Edison Plant
IW W. Williams, Mgr. of
Operations, Detroit
U. S. Lake Survey
Canadian Hydrographic
Service
U. S. Lake Survey
U. S. Lake Survey
Water treatment plant
(Lansing)


1954 -variable
see data
1953 -possibly
earlier
1953 -possibly
earlier
1929 -

X
1949 -

X
1949 -

X
1949 -

1949 -

p 15, 2a
cloud cover,
1949 -pressure,
1957 -

X




I


L __ __ _ h


No.


Intake
location
(ft)
-- ( —)...... I I  II. I  I


Hydrographic Data


Water temp.
Raw  I Treate


Alk.


pH


Turb


Hard,


Bacteria
Coli.   Total


Other


o           --    I ---.. -.-. -   I -- -- - -. — I --              I


1- --         I..                 —....  -... ---
i          I   -        I  -,      i                                     I                              I -. ---,.......!I
I
I
i
I


2
3
4
5
6


1956 -X
X


'
'


'
'


7
0


water level (cont
water level
water level
water level
(bi-daily)
water level
(cont.)
water level
(cont.)
water level
(tri-daily)
color, odor


I
)
c
t


I


Remarks


water temp.
records dis-:arded after
two yrs.


- --




0


9
10
11


5000 (16)


X


X


X


X




I!
I No.
I
IIMo
II


Location


Agency and Contact


Period
of Record


Mcrnnrnlna~rln flee..Q


i


Wind
Speed


Air
Temp


Pcpno


I


Mf Anlrln r1 in  1 TnI.f


Other   I


Dir.


I                                                                                                            1      -.9.        4
I~..i.


i
t
L
II
II?
I
i
i
|
I
I
I


12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 -24


Mt. Clemens, Mich.
St. Clair Flats
(Sans Souci), Micho
Grosse Point Farms,
Mich.
Grosse Point, Mich.
Windmill Point, Mich.
Tecumseh, Ontario
Windsor, Ontario
Windsor, Ontario
Detroit, Mich.
etroit, Mich.


Selfridge Air Force Base
USCG Light (4 hrly)
Water treatment plant
(Lansing)
U. S. Lake Survey
U. S. Lake Survey
Canadian Hydrographic
Service
Water treatment plant
G. H. Strickland, Supt.
Hydro-Electric Power
Commo of Ontario, J.
C. Keith, Plant
R, Shepley, Sta. Supt.
Water treatment plant
(Water Works Park)
(Lansing)
Detroit Edison Plants:
Conners Creek, Delray,
River Rouge, Trenton
Channel   W. W. Williams
Mgr. of Oper., Detroit


59
1931 -variable
see data
variable
see data
1924 -1953 -possibly
earlier


X
x


X
X


x
1930 -

X


P
P


15, 1
15, 2b


x




I


No.


Intake
location
(ft)


_


Water temp.
Raw ITreated


Hydrographic Data


Alk.


pH


Turb.


Hard.


- Bacteria.
Coli I Total
C oli, To t al


Remarks


Other


+-iii-;, -— ii-. 4 +   -- i - - v  *  %  i  i


12
13
14
15
16
17
18
i
19
20
21 -24


i!
t
I:
i


odor


2000 (14 -16)
1926-1954:
350 (40)
1954-:
300 (40)
see remks.
-- (26)


x
x


X
1950 -1955 -X


x
1950 -1955 -X


X
1928 -X


x
1930 -1930 -

x
1930 -X


water level
(cont.)
water level
(cont.)
water level
(cont.)


alk, pH reported rarely
intake is chan
nel dredged ca
15 ft deep 140
ft from shore


1930 -1952 -

1950 -

taste, odor, 1928
plankton, 1930 -water level, 1956


1955 -

Cl, conductivity,
1955 -

X


odor, plankton
water level


X






No.


Location


Agency and Contact


Period
of Record


I


Meteorolo ical Data
Wind        Air     Pc        Other
Dir.   Speed Temp. - -


00
0. v..                                              -0- -1 -- ~   -  --  -


-       I. — -


25  Detroit, Mich.
26 La Salle, Ontario
27 Wyandotte, Mich,
28   yandotte, Mich.
29   yandotte, Micho
30   elle Isle, Mich.
31  Grosse Ile, Mich.
32  Gibraltar, Mich.
33 Gibraltar, Micho


U. S. Lake Survey
Canadian Hydrographic
Service
Water treatment plant
(Lans ing)
Wyandotte Chemical Corp.
J. F, Hunter, Pollution
Control Engineer
U. S. Lake Survey
USCG Lifeboat (4 hrly)
Naval Air Station
U. S. Lake Survey
USCG Light (4 hrly)


1946 -variable
see data
1942-.r

x      X


11
li!,
1
Ir.


i.


Ipressure,
c loud cover
il


X
X


x
X


x
X
X


p 15,
P 15,


2b
I


X


X     X


p 15, 2b




i


No,


Intake
location
(ft)


-         -.  -- -.            -


Water temp.    Alk
Raw    TreateQ


pH


Turb.


Hard.


Bac t
Coli.


Hydrographic Data


{,-. I - -..,....1. -  --.   I.  I


25
26
27
28
29


1800 (25)


x
1950 -

x
1937 -

x


x


x
1937 -

x


30
31
32


eS


water level
(cont.)
water level
(cont.):ia
Total


Remarks


Other


x


C1, F1, odor
C1, Ca, 1937 -water level
(cont.)
water level
(cont.)


total bact.
discont. afte:
1956


I           I _ I  _ _


33




II


LAKE ERIE (starting on United States side at mouth








No


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9




m


Location


I
I




i

4onroe, Micho
Monroe, Mich.
Monroe, Mich.
Monroe, Mich.
Erie, Mich.
oledo, Ohio
oledo, Ohio
oledo, Ohio
oledo, Ohio


iI


im


Agency and Contact
i Water treatment plant


of Detroit
Period
of Record


-1


Water treatment plant
(Lansing)
Univ. of Mich. Research
USWB cooperative
U. S. Lake Survey
Consumers Power Co., M.   ]
C. Stiff, Electric Prod.
Supt., Jackson, Mich.
ater treatment plant. R. Henderson, Supt.
(Columbus)
nterlake Iron Corp.. L. Johnson, Gen, Supt.!
oledo Edison Co., Bay
hore Plant. S. Grant, Chief Chemist
USWB cooperative




1937 -

1956 -41
L955-56 -1941 -variable
see data
1952-53
1956 -9


I
II...,..I


X


-  -~


Wind
Dir. Speed


River and proceeding counterclockwise)
I            Meteorological Data


__j


X    X
(X)




Air
Tempo I


x
X
1953 -X


t
I
I
1I


L



Pcpn.


a,


--- --


X


I
i
i


m
m


Other


lapse rate
humidity,
1953 -pressure,
1953 -



co
ts>


I


I




I


No. I:
I!


- c- —


Intake
location
(ft)


HTvdrncrrlnhri fn at......... —......, --., —._ --  '~"' v~ *J 7 b ''  --- "-, —rr


- ~~ --


7 -

Water temp.
Raw  ITreated


Alk.


pH


Turb.


Hard.


Bacteria
Coli. ITotal


Remarks


Other


I                                                                             1                      I.                      I


1 15360 (23)
2  i
3


X


4
5
6
7
8
9


see remarks
10560 (10)


X
(summei
only)
1 yr.
K


K
K
K
(K


x
(K)


K
K
K


K
K
K
(K)


K
K


X


Ca, Mg, odor
lake level (cont.
conductivity, surf
tension, susp.
solids, diss. sol
ids, total solids
Ca, Ci, Mg, Fe,
Cu, Mn, Na, K, N,
NH3, N03, SiO2,
504, A1203, C02,
02 consumed, los
of solids by igni
tion, phenols,
sulfides, odor
Mg
lake level, 1 yr.
unspecified "chemical data"


intake in 15 -19 ft deep
dredged channel originating at end
of, and enclosed by, a
N-S peninsula
intake figs re
to water level
of 570,15 ft.
no winter temp
data


shore line
(0.4 to
13.4 ft.)


00
(o




Noo
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21


Location


Agency and Contact


Period
of Record


O0
4P.

Meteorological Data


Wind   Air
Dir.  Sped  Temp.
X I,


F.




Toledo, Ohio
Toledo, Ohio
Toledo Harbor, Ohio
Maumee Bay (Toledo)
Ohio
Port Clinton, Ohio


_  --   — 1' — -zlg_.  '  l  -- --


USWB cooperative
IU S. Lake Survey
USCG Light (6 hrly)
USCG Light (4 hrly)
Water treatment plant
W. F. Crohen, Supt.
(Columbus)
USWB cooperative


7


X
X


X
X


Catawba Is., Ohio
South Bass Is, (Putin-Bay), Ohio
Gibraltar Is. (South
Bass Is.), Ohio
Marblehead, Ohio
Sandusky, Ohio


i USCG
USWB
USWB


Light (4 hrly)
cooperative


1912 -variable
see data
variable
see data
1910 -81


X


X


X
X
42
X
42
X
X
X
K


Pcpn.    Other
p 15, 2a
I
Ip 15, 2b
41   I
Ip 15, 2b


USCG Lifeboat (6 hrly)
Water treatment plant
0. F. Schoepfle, Supt.
(Columbus)
USCG Light (4 hrly)
USWB First Order


X


X


41
X


p 15, 2a
p 15, 2b
p 15, 1


Sandusky,
Sandusky,


Ohio
Ohio


X
X


X
X




No.


Intake
location
(ft)


-.            -                         -


Hydrographic Data


Water temp>
Raw   Treated


Alk.


pH


Turb.


Hard.


Bacteria
Coli. Total


Other


2                           i                    i                   i                   i                    i                  I                   i   - - - -    -    I -- - --- -        1. ---.-  - i


10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21


(cont.


lake level


1000 (0-8)
2500 (19.5


X


x
x


x
x


X


x
x


x
x


I




Remarks


variable intake depth due
to observed
fluctuations
in lake level
(per plant
supt.)




00
'n




i


I
— l.
4
t
4


No.


Location


Agency and Contact


Period
of Record


------------- ^   LV 1u W L   -— L "42t-C -


Wind
Dir. Speed


Air
Temp.


Mr fonrnlnr e i r nl 1 fL t

00
0'%


Pcpn.


Other


-                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          i,.


22 Huron, Ohio


23


Huron, Ohio


24  Vermilion, Ohio
25 Lorain, Ohio
26 Lorain, Ohio
27 Lorain, Ohio
28  Elyria, Ohio
29  Avon Lake, Ohio
30  -von Point, Ohio
I


ater treatment plant
S R. Hetrick, Supt.
(Columbus)
USCG Light (4 hrly)
ater treatment plant
W K. Eisenhauer, Supt.
(Columbus)
Water treatment plant
G. Walkenshaw, Supt.
(Columbus)
Ohio Edison Co., Edgewate:
Plant
J. W. Mikels, Gen. Supt.
of Power Production
USCG Lifeboat (4 hrly)
Water treatment plant
N. J. Humason, Supt.
(Columbus)
ater treatment plant
R. R. Underhill, Supt.
(Columbus)
Cleveland Elec. and Illum
Co., Avon Plant, C. A.
Dauber, Dir. Civil & Mech.
Engr., Cleveland


X


X


1916 -1910- -
variable
see data
1903 -1928 -variable
see data


X
1956-   1956
(see remarks:


1909 -

X
X
X
1956 -

weather
p 15, 2b
weather, lake
surface
p 15, 2b
humidity,
1956 -

X


X


1956 -

1956 -



No.


Intake
location
(ft)


__.  w J_, L,... -. -.-v —J,'C.
ilI  Ir




Water temp.
aP a   Tr- a t- o


Alk.


TT7drnarAnh,i r* n oA


pH


Turb.


Hard.


- Bact eria
CM1 i'  T^- 1


r


Other


I i


Remarks


- -I. I    ^ I F  ^ W                                               v LV I  - A  --- a ---- t  I  ~ J-  — L -L J -


I
4
I
I
I
I


22 1000 (13
23
24  1904-50:
1300 (8)
1950-:
1300 (12)
25  2000 ( —)
26  see remarks
27
28  1500
(ca 13)
29  1200 (15)
30  |see remarks


x


X
x
X
1948 -X
X


x
x
x


x
x
x
X


x
x
x
x
x


x
x
x
x


x
x
x
x
'


x
'
'


r
i


rater level 1948 -



k


intake is 800
ft channel 30
ft wide, 8-10
ft deep meteorological
data on file
at Battelle
Memorial Inst.
Columbus, O.;
letter of release needed
from Ohio Ed.
intake is 1000
ft channel
dredged to 18
ft depth




X
X


I
I


I




No.


Meteorological Data


00
Co


Location


I Agency and Contact


Period
of Record. -...


Wind
Dir. Speed




--


Air
Temp.


Pcpn.


Other...........' i.....


31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38


Cleveland, Ohio
Cleveland, Ohio
Cleveland, Ohio


Water treatment plant
F, J. Schwemler, Commissioner of Water; Columbus
USCG Lifeboat (6 hrly)
USWB cooperative (Cleveland Easterly Sewage PI.)


Cleveland,


Ohio


Cleveland, Ohio
Cleveland, Ohio
East Lake, Ohio
Willoughby, Ohio
Fairport, Ohio


USWB cooperative (Euclid
Ave.)
Cleveland Electric &
Illuminating Co., Lake
Shore Plant (5 mi. E
downtown Cleveland)
C. A. Dauber, Dir. Civil
&Mech. Engr,, Cleveland
U. S. Lake Survey
Cleveland Electric &
Illuminating Co., East
Lake Plant, C. A. Dauber,
Dir. Civil & Mech. Engr,,
Cleveland
USWB cooperative
Water treatment plant
E. Thomas, Supt.
(Columbus)


1917 -3
14
1932 -variable
see data
53
1936 -

X      X
1955-  1955 -

I
I


p 15, 2a


x
x
IC


pressure


39




No


Intake
location
(ft)


____________  A  ~.     h

Water temp.
Raw Treated


Hvdro:raphic Data


Alk.


pH


Turb.


Hard.


Bacteria
Conl i  Tn-al


Remarks


Other


-........i ----'....  --  I.....  I  I -  -..,         I i -,. ---


31


see remarks


32
33
34
35 'see remarks


x
x


x


x


x


x


x


i
i
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
i
t


Mg                    4
i
A
(
4
3
2
I                    I
hake level (cont.):
f
I IC
I               1
IC1


* plants, with.ntakes: Div.
yve.: 4 mi.
36) Baldwin:
* mi. (28)
lot tingham:;.5 mi. (40)
lague Rd.
'under const.)
2.5 mi. (35)
intake is
'very short"
dredged chan.


x


II


36


37 see remarks
38
39  1000 (12); 1953 -

II
II
i
0I
1
I
I


I


I
intake is 1000:
ft channe 1     I
dredged to 18
ft depth


x


x


x


X


00
%0




No.


Location


--           I


40
/,1


-T L
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50


Fairport, Ohio
Painesville, Ohio
Painesville, Ohio
Painesville, Ohio
Ashtabula, Ohio
Ashtabula, Ohio
Ashtabula, Ohio
Conneaut, Ohio
Conneaut, Ohio
Conneaut, Ohio
Erie, Pennsylvania


Agency and Contact
O
USCG Lifeboat (4 hrly)
Water treatment plant
E. W. Russell, Supt.
(Columbus)
Diamond Alkali Co., R. E.
Frey, Asst. Works Mgr.
USWB cooperative
Water treatment plant
F. J. Hull, Chemist
(Columbus)
Cleveland Elec. & Illum.
Co., Ashtabula Plt., C.
A. Dauber, Dir. Civil &
Mech. Engr., Cleveland
USCG Lifeboat (6 hrly)
Water treatment plant
W. V. Kantola, Supt.
(Columbus)
USWB cooperative
USCG Light (4 hrly)
Water treatment plant
J. D. Johnson, Gen. Supt.I


Meteorolonical D1ata


Period
if Record


Wind
Dir.   Speed


Air
Tem.


- ---- w `12       ao r4
I                       Iv


I, I, —..  -, --- — ---- 1 -,- I  -I-'
I I  TeInI


x


X


X


Pcpn.


Other


1914 -1945 -9
1909 -1930 -1900 -19


K
K
K


0
a


K
K


p 15, 2b
p 15, 2a
p 15, 2b


X


X


X


X




No.


Intake
location
(ft)


Hydrographic Data


t  I    Ir  - iI


Water temp.
Raw  fTreated


Alk.


pH


Turb.


Hard.


Bacteria
Coli. Total


I


Remarks


Other. i..  L,                                               I          I                    I. A..  I..  I                 II


40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50


I. - - -   -- -- - I                           I                              I


X


1914-57:
1000 (8)
1957-:
4000 (16)
3488 (22)
iDtUV kA))
1500 (25)
see remarks
see remarks
5200 (22)


x
K


x
K


I           A..


K
K
K


K
K


K
K
K


K
K
K
K


X!


HC03, Cl, C03, Ca,
ig, Na, SiO2, loss
n ignition, total
solids


K
K


intake is 1000
ft channel
dredged to 18
ft depth
present intake
in use since
1934: 1500
(16). No info.
on prev. intk.


K
K


X


color, OCCASIONAL
kNALY: Fe, Ca, MgJ
Na, NO3, C1, chlorinity, total slds.


%0
1-"




No.


F%)


Meteorological Data


Location


Agency and Contact


Period
of Record


Wind
Dir.


i                             r                        I


Air
Temp.


Pcpn.


Speed


Other


ii                                                                          i*                      ft                              1          -


51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63


Erie, Pennsylvania
Erie, Pennsylvania
Erie, Pennsylvania
Erie, Pennsylvania
Dunkirk, N. Y.


Dunkirk, N. Y.
Dunkirk, N. Y.
Dunkirk, N. Y.
Derby, N. Y.
Lackawanna, N.


USWB First Order Ap.
USWB First Order City
USCG Lifeboat (6 hrly)
U. S. Lake Survey
Niagara Mohawk Power CorF
Dunkirk Station
P. A. Burt, Supt.
USWB cooperative
U. S. Lake Survey
USCG Light (4 hrly)
USWB cooperative
Erie County Water Auth.
H. S. Dewey, Adm. Dir.,
Ellicott Square Bldg.,
Buffalo 3, N. Y.
USCG Base (6 hrly)
U. S. Lake Survey
Canadian Hydrographic
Service


6
79


X
X
X


1950 -5


X
X
X


K
K
K
K
K
K
K


K
K
K
K
K


p
p
p


15, 1
15, 1
15, 2a


14
variable
see data


X


X


Y.


p 15, 2b
p 15, 2a


Buffalo, N. Y.
Buffalo, N. Y.
Port Colborne, Ontario


X


X




Hydrographic Data


No.


Intake
location
(ft)


Water temp.
Raw  Trreated


Alk.


- -I. ---- - I      -.........


pH


Turb.


Hard.


Bacteria
Coli. ITotal


1


Other


- +.1          1,                     i..                    1...                                                         I I


51
52
53
54
55
56
r-f,
57
58
59
60
61
62
63


I


at breakwall (see
remarks)
-- ( —)


X


X
1926 -

X


X


lake level
(cont.)
conductivity,
S02, S04, C1,
HC03, lake level
lake level
(cont.)
color, odor, 1928
summer plankton,
1930 -lake level (cont.


I
I


Remarks
intake samples
entire water
column between
8 and 21 feet


1926 -

1928- 1 1926 -

1926 -

1926 -

lake


level (cont.




No.


Location


Agency and Contact


Period
of Record.,-.........  a..a


M   tonrn nlnai a 1 n si-n


Wind
Dir.   Speed


Air
Temp.


Pcpn.


Other


*               - -     -                                                                                                                 i  I. --                                             I.   __                                                      I




64
65
66
67
68
69
70


I


Port Dover, Ontario
Long Point, Ontario
Clear Creek, Ontario
Port Stanley, Ontario
Wheatley, Ontario
Leamington, Ohtario
Pelee Is., Ontario


I


CMD II
CMD II
CMD I
Canadian Hydrographic
Service
Ont. Dept. Lands &
Forests Station
Dr. D. V. Anderson,
Maple, Ontario
CMD II
CMD II


I


variable
see data
variable
see data
variable
see data
variable
see data


I     I                                                 I


at
36
X


least
36
X


(X)
(X)
X


~                                                        a.....


45
(X)
X


p 15, 1


(X)
(X)


33
48




No.
m
64
65
66
67
68
69
70


Intake
location   Water temp.
(ft)    Raw   Treated
X


Alk.


Hydrographic Data
Turb. jHard. -
Coll.


pH


acteria.  Total


-' I ----— 1- -.11..... -l I I


Remarks


Other


I...R             k I I


— _  __._..  ~_.__.  _.. _.__ CoiL __ _  __


lake level
(cont.)


recording
thermograph
at station


i


n.0
a'




NIAGARA RIVER (proceeding south to north)


~D
ON. ______     Meteorological Data___
Period
No.      Location               Agency and Contact         eord        Wind         Air
of Record                          Pcpn.     Other
i.......


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8


Grand Is.
N. Y.


(Tonawanda),


Slater's Point, Ontario
Conner's Is., N, Y.
Niagara Falls, N. Y.
Niagara Falls, N. Y.
Niagara Falls, Ontario
Niagara Falls, Ontario
Lewiston, N. Y.


Niagara Mohawk Power
Corp., Huntley Station
W. G. Godfrey, Supt.
Canadian Hydrographic
Service
U. S. Lake Survey
U. S. Lake Survey
Naval Air Station
CMD II
CMD II
USWB cooperative


1948 -

- -
1943-53
variable
see data


i
I
I
I


X


X


x
X42
X
42


x
X
37


p 15, 1




Intake L....               Hydrographic Data                     -|_____
No. location  Water temp.,Tur.                     Bacteria                     Remarks
(ft)   Raw   Treate  Alk                    Coli. TTotal    Oth
Iad                  [...................................... Co Toa......


1
2
3
4
S
i5
6
7
8


shoreline
(27)


x


X


X


X


K


S04, C1;
water level from
1933
water level
(cont.)
water level
(cont.)
water level
(cont.)


I








80~00'                    79~00'                    78~ 00'                  77~00'                    76OO0'
ORIENTATION  CHART
LAKE ONTARIO
KI TON
BELLEVIL^/LE                       GAPE VINCENT
TRENTON                  t 044 J/^,          PT
44~ 00'
COBOURG                                      MAIN DUCK ISERTOWN
WATERTOWN
BOWMANVILLE
OSHAWA    -                                                       GALOO ISZ
TORON    /                                                  a      R     l     0
PORT CREDIT'                                    0 O
LP-   A                                                                   OSWEGO
/                    THIRTY MILE PT                                       /
BURLINTON                                                                         SOUS PT
HAMILT       PORWOER^Y       G   WN                      ROCHESTC  H
YORT W
RIMSif~-\      LEWISTON
NIAGARA FALLS-@                STATUTE MILES?     'p  go   3,0 04,0                                                      * 00O




Figure 6. Orientation Chart, Lake Ontario




LAKE ONTARIO (starting at mouth of Niagara River and nroceedin


crnunte'rrcf lnrlkwti  a


Ir0


N  L ocIPeriod       Meteorological Data
No,       Location               Agency and Contact          riod
Dir.    Speed  Temp.     Pcpno
1:,..                                        - Niagaa  - (


1 Niagara (Youngstown),
N, Y.
2 Niagara, N. Y.
3  Wilson, N. Y,
4 Barker, N. Y.
5 Thirty Mile Point
(Barker), N. Y.
6  Rochester, N. Y.
7  Rochester, N. Y.


I
I
I
I
I
I
I


USCG Lifeboat (6 hrly)
U. S. Lake Survey
USWB cooperative
USWB cooperative
USCG Light (4 hrly)
Bureau of Water
I. Q. Lacy, Supt.
Eastman Kodak Co.
L. C. Faulkenberry, Asst.
to the Gen. Mgr.
[SCG Lifeboat (6 hrly). S. Lake Survey
SCG Light (4 hrly)
iagara Mohawk Power Co.. M. Jeram, Supt.
SCG Lifeboat (6 hrly)


X


X


X


p 15, 2a


18
18
mid 1955 -variable
see data
I  --
I    --
variable
see data


x


X


X


X
x
K


8
9
10
11


Rochester, N. Y,
Rochester, N. Y.
Sodus Point, N. Y.
Oswego, N. Y.


X


x


p 15, 2b
p 15, 2a
p 15, 2b
pressure,
1948 -p 15, 2b


X


X


12 )swego, N. Y.


X


X




___ __. ___ __ I ___ __ ___ __I_


No.


Intake
location
(ft)


Hvdrnoaranhic Dlata.... -......... II-I


Water temp.
Raw   Treated


Alk.


pH


Turb.


Hard.


Bacteria
Coli. Total


Other.. F         - I:.... - -....


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11


lake level (tridaily)


I


8300 (50)
7800 (55)
550 (20)


x
1937 -

x


x
1947 -1940 -

x
1952 -

1947 -1940 -

adioactivity, 195
OLLOWING CHEM
NAL: volatile and
rg. matter, silic
ron and alumina
xides, CaO, MgO,
ulphuric anhyride, C1, 1947-.
lake level (cont.)
03, HC03, Cl, S04
i02, total diss.
olids, conductivty, 1940-. Lake
level, 1955-,


I. i1




Remarks


1948 -

0
t-.


12




I o
I b3


Metenrnl oiral D ata


No.


Location


Agency and Contact


Period
of Record


- --- -..


i


Wind
Dir.   Speed


Air
Temp.


Pcpn.


-. i..                                                        I-.


13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24


Oswego, N. Y,
Oswego, N. Y.
Galloo Is., (Sacketts
Hbr.), N. Y.
Watertown, N, Y.
Tibbetts Point (Cape
Vincent), N. Y.
Cape Vincent, N. Y.
Cape Vincent, N. Y.
Kingston, Ontario


USWB cooperative
U. S. Lake Survey
USCG Lifeboat (4 hrly)
USWB Second Order CAA Ap
USCG Light (4 hrly)
USCG Light Attendant
(4 hrly)
U. S. Lake Survey
CMD c
CMD II
CMD II
Canadian Hydrographic
Service
CMD c


variable
see data


10


K
K
K
K


K
K
K
K


104
X
X
X
X
(X)
X
X


112
X


Other
p 15, 2b
p 15, 1
p 15, 2b


p 15, 2b


variable
see data


Kingston,
Kingston,
Kingston,


Ontario
Ontario
Ontario


at least
36      36
at least
14      14


(X) Isunshine, 68


X
x


Main Duck Is., Ontario


(weather)




No
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24


Intake
location    Water tempr
(t)   Raw  Treated Alk.
(ft)     Raw   Treated


-        l- -  -          - -


pH


Turb.


Hard.


Hydrogranhic Data


Bacteria
Coli. eTotal


Remarks


Other


i                                         a -                                                                                                                                         i.i


lake level (cont.)
lake level (cont.)
lake level (cont.)


o-A
0
LI3




No.


Location


Agency and Contact


Period
of Record


to
$

m,., l - ~


25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36


Belleville, Ontario
Belleville, Ontario
Trenton, Ontario


CMD II
CMD II


CMD I


Trenton,
Cobourg,


Ontario
Ontario


CMD
CMD


II
II


Cobourg, Ontario
Bowmanville, Ontario
Oshawa, Ontario
Toronto, Ontario
Toronto, Ontario
Toronto, Ontario
Toronto, Ontario


Canadian Hydrographic
Service
CMD II
CMD II
Water treatment plant
D. P. Scott, Deputy
Comm. of Works
Hydro-Elec. Power Comm.
of Ontario, R. L. Hearn
Generating Station, E.
D. Holdup, Plant Supt.
West Hill CMD III
Scarborough CMD III


variable
see data
17     i
- -
17
-- I
variable
see data
variable
see data


x
x       x   I  x
x
X
at least    (X)
32      32
X
X
ca 1948 -

(X)


56   sunshine, 25
X
X   p 15, 1
(X)
I
i
I
X
X
X




No.


Intake
location
(ft)


I


Hydrographic Data


I


Remarks,,.- -.   — I


I


Water temp.    Alk.
I Raw   Treated!


PH


Turb.


Hard.


Bacteria
Coli. Total


Other.... --.... —.-  -. -  v- — O --- —--—..


4'i


25
26
I 27
28


29
30
31


I
lake level (cont.j
I
plankton, 1922 -nitrogen, C1, disS
02 (period uncertain) lake
level, 1912 -conductivity, 195




32


33
34
35


before
1918: 3800
(35
1918-pres:
3800 (69)
see remarks


1936 -1952 -

1912 -1955 -

1925 -1955 -

1913 -

1912-17
1922-23
1931
1955 -

1912 -

1914 -

36


O
Un




No.


Meteorolomical Data


0
ON


Location


Agency and Contact


Period
of Record


Wind       Air
Dir.    Speei Temp.


-               r

Pcpn.


Other


r      -                            -    --- -            4


37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49


Toronto,
Toronto,
Toronto,
Toronto,
Toronto,
Toronto,
Toronto,


Ontario
Ontario
Ontario
Ontario
Ontario
Ontario
Ontario


Toronto, Ontario
Port Credit, Ontario
Burlington, Ontario
Hamilton, Ontario
Hamilton, Ontario
Hamilton, Ontario


Birchcliffe CMD III
Admiral Road CMD III
Balmy Beach CMD III
Hyde Park CMD III
Highland CMID II
Newtonbrook CMD II
CMD I
Canadian Hydrographic
Service
CMD II
CMD II
Water treatment plant
D. H. Matheson, Dir. of
Laboratories
CMD III (Gage Park)
CMD II (Hamilton)


variable
see data
variable
see data


at least
36       36
1957-  1957 -

X
x
117
X
X
1951 -(X)


X
x
x
1
117


sunshine, 72
p 15, 1


x
x
(X)
(gauges
op. by
City
Engrs.
Dept.)
X
58


I




NOo


Intake
location
(ft)...........             -,v_._i-*   A-   A. j - & prL AA.. ---A'  _,.? -?....


Hvdrnroranh3ic Dfiat


Remarks


- Water temp.
Raw    Treated


Hard


Alk.


pH


Turb.


CiBac teria
Colio. Total


Other


i-          I i  iii        l


37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49


lake level (cont.)I


TWO INTAKES
2200 (30)
3000 (30)


1934 -

1933 -

1933 -

1934 -

1933 -

1933 -

1934 -

chem, phys, biol.
work on Burlingtor
Bay at intervals
since 1935
lake level, 1952 -

0
To
rt




No.1


Location


Agency and Contact


Period
of Record


Meteorological Data


o
0a
00


5;  -- L-I


Wind
Dir.   Speed


Air
Temp.


Pcpn.


Other.......... F-..- _ _ _ _ _ __~-      -...4..::~~~:   -:,, -........6.             I.
i..


50
51
52
53


Hamilton, Ontario
Grimsby, Ontario
Grimsby, Ontario
Port Weller, Ontario


CMD I
CMD II
CMD II
Canadian Hydrographic
Service


X


K


K
K
K


K
K.
K


p 15, 1




I


No,


Intake
location
(ft)........ -L, -,-,, s..-.  - -    ---


Water temp.
Raw    Treated


Alk.


pH


tama


Turb.


Hard.


Bac
Colil


I                                          I


-. --


I     i               I.  - -41 -


50
51
52
53


te
I.ria
total


-   -    i                                                i i


Other


Remarks


lake level (cont.)I


t


tCD
Od




110


H.  Non-tabulated Data
Information relating to river discharge has not been included in the
tabulations. Discharge figures for major streams and rivers tributary
to the Great Lakes are obtained from gaugings in both the United States
and Canada. In the United States, the responsible agency is the U. S.
Geological Survey. Records pertinent to the Great Lakes basin are published yearly in the publication Surface Water Supply of the St.
Lawrence River Basin..D......'.....__'I./
In Canada, discharge records are obtained by the Canada Department
of Northern Affairs and National Resources, Water Resources Branch,
Records are published yearly in Water Resources apers, which are very
similar to those issued by the U. S. Geological Survey.
Both of the above publications are generally two to three years in
arrears. More recent data, if desired, are available from individual
U, S. Geological Survey offices in the United States, or from the Department of Northern Affairs and National Resources, Water Resources
Branch, Ottawa, Ontario.
There are several sources of meteorological data that are not shown
in Table 1. Principally, these are data collected by commercial vessels
operating on the Lakes. These have not been listed in Table 1 since the
data are obtained in varying quantities and locations during the year.
There are approximately 37 commercial lake vessels operated by
United States companies and about half that many Canadian commercial
vessels that make meteorological measurements when operating more thin
four miles from shore. These data are transmitted by radio to collection
agencies in Canada and the United States for use by marine meteorological
personnel and for dissemination over meteorological communications networks.
In addition, there is a smaller number of research and other special
purpose vessels which take meteorological data at whatever time they may
be conducting operations. This group is comprised of fisheries investigations vessels, U. S. Lake Survey vessels such as the "Williams", the
paper mill cruiser operated in northeastern Lake Superior by Colin A.
MacMillan of the Marathon Paper Company, and the U. S. Coast Guard cutter "Mackinac."  The latter vessel makes six-hourly reports to the U. S.
Weather Bureau at Cleveland, Ohio, whenever operating farther than four
miles from shore.
II.  Table 2
Table 2 lists all meteorological data sources that were inland from
the sources listed in. Table 1. An inland source was defined to be suitable for inclusion in Table 2 if it was more than two miles from the
nearest Iake shoreline. As was indicated earlier, an irregular area
surrounding the Lakes was specified to be important as far as the meteorological effects on the Lakes are concerned. This "area of influence"
was selected as the drainage basin of the Great Lakes. The basin has
been determined by the U. So Lakes Survey (see Fig. 7, p. 112).




111


All data sources in the drainage basin (or watershed) of the Lakes,
that could be ascertained by the project, are listed. Tabulations are
made geographically by state and province, but alphabetically by stations
under each province and state. Accordingly, the geographical coordinates
of inland stations are shown in degrees and minutes of arc. The type of
data source is indicated in the second column; abbreviations have the
foLlowing meanings: FO - USWB First Order; SO - USWB Second Order;
Co - USWB Cooperative; I - CMD Class I; II, III, and c - CMD Classes
II, III, and c, respectively; and R - research facility. Some locations
have more than one First Order station. Usually one is located at an
airport; hence the abbreviation A_ is used in the tabulations. If the
installation is in the city, City is used, and if the facility is military, the following are used: NAS for Naval Air Stations, and AFB for Air
Force Bases0 The letters CAA and USCG refer to Civil Aeronautics Administration and U. So Coast Guard facilities, respectively.
With respect to future use of the material compiled in Tables 1 and
2, project personnel adjudged that data sources in close juxtaposition
to the watershed boundary, but outside it, should be included in the
tabulation. This procedure was justified on the grounds that meteorological events (precipitation, for example), although occurring outside
the basin would, nevertheless, be representative of conditions in the
immediate vicinity of the basin boundary. The number and locations of
extra-basin stations were arbitrarily selected. Here again, the stations
outside the watershed used by the Uo S. Lake Survey in computation of
precipitation regimes for lake level studies were used as a basic group.
In addition to these, several First Order and Class I stations were included even though they were located somewhat farther distant than most
from the basin boundary. All stations outside the boundary are indicated in Table 2 by an asterisk preceding the location name.
The same system for indicating length of record and parameters
measured is used here that was employed in Table 1; that is, the numbers
appearing in the columns to the right of the location specifications are
years of record. Where it is known that an element is measured but the
length of record is not known, "X" appears in the space. All parameters
taken that are not specified in the table may be determined by consulting
the reference given in the last column to the right.




_ __ __ 1 _ I_


0


I
i
i
i
i
i
i


AT LAKES DRAINAGE BASIN
STATUTE MILES
0     50  o10   ISO    2


ZGRE
P                                 i.
*, o           4, -
4f
5
Fiur                                          \ " ---L
*/                                   ( \
o e
-  \                                ' ('
Figure 7.   Orientation Chart, Great Lakes Drainage Basin


* 0
i   S   Y  L   V  A   N   I  A


--- ------- - -- --




113


Table 2, Inland Data Sources.eg min |deg mi                          | Yrs Ys |Yrs |Yrs| (re    rs
deg     min d,       Yrs Yrs Yrs Yr      (ref.yrs)


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
LO
11
12
L3
14
L5
I 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
I1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18


Co
Co
Co
FO
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co


MINNESOTA
*Babbitt
Br imson
Cloquet Expo For,
Duluth Airport
Gunflint Lake
Hibbing Power
Substation
Holyoke
Isabella 1 mio W
Island Lake Reser
voir
Mahoning Mine
Meadowlands 2 mi.
SSW
*Moose Lake 1 mi.
SE
SMoose Lake Rangex
Station
Virginia OMIC Lab.
Wales 2 mi. E
Whiteface Reservoir
ISCONSIN
*Antigo
Appleton
erlin
Bowler
Breakwater
Brillion
rule Ranger Sta.
rule Island
*Burnett
Chilton Sewage
Plant,lintonville
Coddington 1 mio
E
rivitz High Falls
)alton
D ummond
Idurado 1 mi, SE
Flambeau Reservoir
Fond du Lac


47
4/
48
46
48
47
46
47
46
47
47
46
46
47
47
47
45
44
43
44
45
44
46
45
43
44


41
16
42
50
05
27
28
37
59
28
03
27
27


91
91
94%
92
90
9:2
92
91
92
92
92


55
52
18
11
42
57
23
22
14
45
45


39
48
18
8
16
1


92  45


92 46


32  92
13  91
17  92
09  89
15  88
58  88
52  88
50  88
11  88
32  91
57  88
30  88
02  88


32
43
11
09
23
57
59
15
04
35
13
42
09


38
49
37
30
65
15
65
55
18
21
37
35
28
37
56
32


38
48
18
1
37
48
35
65
65
55
23
56
32
6
38
48
14
20


39
X
48
18
8
16
1
38
49
37
30
65
15
X
65
55
18
21
37
35
28
37
56
32
18
38
48
14
16
20
33
73




18


181p 15, 1:(18)


44  37 88 45    18
44  22  89 32   38


45
43
46
43
46


17
39
20
48
04


88
89
91
88
90
88


12
12
15
37
14
27


48
14
16
20
33


43 147


73 1 73




114


I


Nooplass


Location


Lat N Long W
deg min deg min


Per
of
lRec


Temp Pcpn
Yrs Yrs


LI


I


I                 -    I ----                                                                     I                                I                                       %.-      i            __j


-- I  A


19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63


Co
FO
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
FO
FO
FO
Co
Co
FO
Co
Co
Co
Co
SO
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
SO
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co


WISCONSIN cont.
Germantown 2 mio W
Green Bay Airport
Gurney
Hancock Exp. Farm
*Hayward Ranger
Station
Lac Vieux Desert
*Lake Geneva
Laona 4 mio SSW
Lily
Longlake Dam
*Madison Airport
*Madison City
*Madison Truax AFB
Mellen 2 mi, N
Mercer Ranger Sta.
Milwaukee Ap,
Montello
New London
*Oconomowoc 1 mio
SW
Oshkosh
*Park Falls
Peshtigo
*Phelps Deerskin
Dam
Pine River 3 mio
NE
Plymouth
Portage
lest Lake
~Rhinelander
ipon 5 mio NE
Rosholt Collins
Shawano
Solon Springs
South Pelican
~Stevens Point
ummit Lake Ranger
Station
[ownsend
kUnion Grove
~aupaca
'Wausau
Wausau CAA Ap.
Wausau Old POO.
iausaukee
Nest Allis
~est Bend
Wisconsin Dells


I  I!


43
44
46
44
46
46
42
45
45
45
43
43
43
46
46
42
43
44
43
44
45
45
46
44
43
43
46
45
43
44
44
46
45
44
45
45
42
44
44
44
44
45
43
43
43


13
29
28
07
00
08
36
30
19
54
08
05
18
21
10
57
48
23
06
03
56
04
03
11
45
32
08
38
52
36
47
21
32
30
23
20
42
22
59
55
57
23
01
25
38


88
88
90
89
91
89
88
88
88
89
89
89
89
90
90
87
89
88
88
88
90
87
89
89
87
89
89
89
88
89
88
91
89
89
89
88
88
89
89
89
89
87
87
88
89! -   I


09
08
30
32
29
08
26
42
51
08
20
24
21
37
04
54
19
44
31
32
27
44
02
02
59
27
53
25
45
20
37
49
12
34
12
35
03
05
39
37
38
57
59
11
47


15
72
6
67
27
14
14
29
17
51
19
90
33
25
31
63
63
20
70
48
13
49
7
49
70
49
57
18
63
53
14
66
19
14
18
64
14
64
25
26
7
45
36


15
72
6
67
14
28
51
19
90
X
33
31
51
63
20
70
48
7
49
66
49
54
X
63
53
66
14
63
64
25
7
45
36


15
72
6
67
27
14
14
29
17
51
19
90
X
33
25
31
63
63
20
70
48
13
49
7
49
70
49
57
X
18
63
53
14
66
19
14
18
64
14
64
25
26
7
45
36


i


T,


winc
Yrs
72
19
90
31


I


Wea
Yrs
72
19
90
K


(ref;yrs)
p 15, 1:(72)
p 15, 1:(19)
p 15, 1:(90)
p 15, 1:(X)


I


311 p 15, 1:01)


X  p 15, 1:(X)






X
ir
I


p 15, 1:(X)


I






115


Class


No.


Location


Lat N
deg min


Per
Long, W  of
deg min Rec
-  I Re c


Temp
Yrs


Pcpn
Yrs


Wind Wea
Yrs Yrs


Other
(ref: rys)


II                        ---        -     - -              *- -                                         W. I.I. r....,l --


1
2
3
4
51
6
7
8
9
10C


Co
Co


Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co


11
12
13
14
15
16


FO
FO
Co
FO
Co
SO
Co
R


ILLINOIS
*Antioch
*Arlington Hgts.
4 mi, SSE
*Chicago Calumet
Treatment Works
*Chgo Mayfair
Pnpg. Station
*Chgo N. Br. Pmpg
Station
*Chgo Roseland
Pmpg. Station
*Chgo San. Dist,
Disp. Plant
*Chgo Springfield
Pmpg. Station
*Chicago Midway
Airport
*Chicago O'Hare
Airport
*Elgin
*Glenview NAS
*Joliet Brandon
Rd.
*Joliet CAA Ap.
*Joliet
*Lemont Argonne
National Lab.
*McHenry
*McHenry 2 mi. S
*Peotone
*Wheaton College
*Skokie
*Skokie N. Side
Treatment Works


41 I 58


41 58


42
42
41


29
02
40


88
87
87
87
87
87
87
87
87


41 142


17 Co
18 Co


41
41
41
42
42
42
41
41
41
41
42
42
41
41
42
42
41
40
40
40
40
41
41


06
58
36
45
42
38
42
44
45


00 87


53 --


38
8
21
32
25
32
27
32
30


19
20
21
22
4
1
4


Co
Co
Co
Co


02
05
30
36
32
40
21
19
20
52
02
01
38
40
44
45
44


88
87
88
88
88
88
88
88
87
88
87
87
85
84
85
85
85


50
55
47


17
49
06
05
05
00
I 16
16
15
48
06
45
43
00
57
11
11
10
29
29


51
15
67
17
10
19
17
18
30
4
60
48
62
18
10
56
18


38
30
X
15
X
16
10
X
4
X
21


38
8
21
32
25
32
27
32
30
X
51
15
67
X
17
10


30
15
X
10


15 p 15, 1 (X)


x
10


p 15, 1: (X)
radiation,
microme teorological
measurements
(10)


Co
Co
Co
Co


x


p 15, 1:(X)


301p 15, 1:(30)


INDIANA
Angola
Berne
*Bluffton
*Bluffton Sewage
Plant
*Bluffton Water
Works
*Columbia City
*Columbia City
I mi. S


19
17
18
30
4
60
48
62
18
10
56
18


5 1 Co


6 Co
7 Co


09 85
08  85




116


No


-


8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
1
2 -3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16


 I
I


Class
Co
Co
Co
FO
Co
SO
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
FO
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co


3


I


Location


Lat
deg


N tong W


minpeg min


Per
of
R'?ar


remp Pcpn Wind Wea
Yrs   Yrs  Yrs  Yrs


I

INDIANA cont.
Decatur
Elkhart
Ft. Wayne Disposal Plant
Ft. Wayne Airport
Fremont
Goshen CAA Airpor
Goshen College
Hobart
Kendallville
Kendallville
Lagrange
La Porte
Monroeville 3 mi,
ENE
*Plymouth Power
Substation
South Bend Airpori
Valparaiso Water
Works
Waterloo
Waterloo Highway
Garage
*Wheatfield
MICHIGAN
Adrian
Alberta Ford Forestry Couq t
lbion Rice Creek
Station
legan Sewage P1
Alma
nn Arbor Univo Sta.
Atlanta 3 mi. ENE
Bad Axe
Baldwin St. Fores
Battle Creek Ap.
Beavertown Pwr, P1
Beechwood 7 mio
WNW
Bellaire Hydroo
Plant
Bergland Hydro.
Plant
Big Rapids Water
Works
Bloomingdale


1!(ef vrs)


Other
(ref: yrs)


40
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
40
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
46
42
42
43
42
45
43
43
42
43
46
44
46
43
42


I


51
41
06
00
44
32
34
32
27
26
39
36
59
20
42
31
25
26
11
54
39
17
32
23
17
01
48
54
18
53
11
59
35
42
23


84
85
85
85
84
85
85
87
85
85
85
86
84


56
58
07
12
56
48
50
15
15
16
25
43
49


86 20


86 19
87 02


85 02
85 01


27
8
13
47
9
18
44
39
12
18
18
64
18
54
71
59
21
18
41
81
1
49
70
72
79
32
34
31
75
11
13
35


87104


47
X
44
39
12
61
53
65
58
19
41
81
1
70
72
79
32
34
31
75
X
26
63
X


27
8
13
47
9
18
44
39
12
18
18
64
18
54
71
59
21
18
41
81
1
49
70
72
79
32
34
31
75
11
X
13
35
63
X


47
X
65
1
K


I


47 lp 15, 1:(47)


X


84 02
88 29


65
x


p 15, 1:(X)
P 15, 1:(65)
evaporation
(X)
sras., pxess. (2)
p 15, 1:(X)


84146


85
84
83
84
83
85
85
84
88


51
40
44
06
01
51
14
29
53


85 12


89 33


85 29  63


85 57


I


F








117


No.


Slass


Location


Lat N
leg min


Long W
deg min


Per
of
Rec


TempPcpn
Yrs Yrs


Win Wea
Yrs Yrs


Other
(ref: yrs)


-                                    I.I                                        1          -        1                             -        i                       i                        i                       i           -


I                  I                                                          I


MICHIGAN cont.


17
183
19
20
2L
22
23
24
25
26
2,7
28
2 9
3 0
31
32
33
34
36
3 7
38
39
40
4].
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49 -50
51


Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
FO
FO
FO
R
Co
Co
Co
FO
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
FO
Co
Co
Co
SO
Co
Co
Co


Boyne Falls
St. Nursery
Burnside 1 mi. E
Cadillac Water
Works
Caro State Hosp.
Casnovia 1 mi. N
Champion Van
Riper Park
Charlotte
Chatham Exp, Farm
Coldwater St. Sch
Coldwater Sewage
Treatment Plant
Crystal Falls
6 mi. NE
earborn
etroit City Ap.
etroit Wayne Co.
Airport
etroit Willow
Run Airport
etroit Int'l
Joint Comm. Res.
owagiac
ast Jordan
ast Lansing Exp.
Farm
East Lansing
ast Lansing
Hort. Farm
aton Rapids
au Claire 4 mi.
NE
dmore
vart
wen
ife Lake 2 mi. S
lint Airport
reesoil 4 mi. SW
aylord Cons. Dpt,
Germfask Wildlife
Refuge
ladwin CAA Ap.
lennie Alcona Dax
7rand Haven Fire
Dept.
rand Ledge


45
43
44
43
43
46
42
46
41
41
46
42
42
42
42
42
41
45
42
42
42
42
42
43
43
46
44
42
44
45
46
43
I 44
44
42


I                                 I               I                I                 I                I              I


13
12
15
27
15
31
32
21
57
56
10
18
24
13
14
28
59
10
42
44
43
31
01
24
54
32
33
58
04
02
17
59
56
34
45


841 48


83 03
85 24


83
85
87
84
861
85
85


24
48
59
50
56
00
01
14


881


83114


83 00
83 19


83 132


83 14


16
50
31
16
55
58
68
16
6
88
5
8
3
5
33
48
1
39
35
5
7
16
40
70
16
49
19
54
11
88
41


X
50
31
X
55
55
68
6
88
8
3
5
33
X
48
1
35
7
40
70
39
19
54
88


x
16
50
31
16
X
55
58
68
X
16
6
88
8
5
33
X
48
1
39
35
5
7
16
40
70
16
49
19
54
11
88
41


86
85
84


07
07
28


84 29
84 28


6
88
8
33
X
48
1
21
X
X
K
K


88
5
8
33
48


evaporation
(6)
p 15, 1:(88)
ceiling,
visibility
(5)
p 15, 1:(8)
lapse rate tc
870 ft (3)
evaporation
(X)
p 15, 1:(48)
evaporation
1)


84 139
86j15


85.
85
89
85
8:3
86
84
853
84
85
83


02
16
16
21
44
17
41
57
29
55
48


21 p 15, 1:(21)


evaporation
(X)
p 15, 1:(X)


X


84 146




118


No.


Class


Location


Lat N


Long W
deg mir


Per
of
RP


Temp Pcpn Wind Wea
Yrs  Yrs Yrs Yrs


Other
(refV yrs)


deg min


- -                             --.,,. i  Ilr   _ _____..._. -  L   _ - __  _ -  -.  -  l I   __..... i  -.


52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67


FO
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
SO
R
R


MICHIGAN cont.
Grand Rapids Ap.
Grayling Militar:
Reservation
Greenville
Gull Lake Exp.
Farm
Gwinn
Hale Five Channels Dam
Harrison
Hart
Hastings Fisher.
Hesperia
Higgins Lake
Hillsdale
Holland
Houghton CAA Ap.
Houghton Univ. of
Michigan res.
Houghton U.S.
Army Sig. Corps
Houghton Lake
3 mi. NW
Howell Sewage P1.
Howell 7 mi, NE
Hubbard Lake Dam
Interlochen State
Park
lonia Gas Plant
Iron Mtn. Water
Works
Ironwood
Ishpeming
Jackson CAA Ap.
Jackson 3 mi. N
Kalamazoo Power
Plant
Kalamazoo State
Hospital
Kalkaska
Kent City 2 mi,
SW
Kenton U.S. For.
Kinross AFB
Lapeer
Lowell 5 mi, NW


68  Co


42
44
43
42
46
44
44
43
42
43
44
41
42
47
47
47
44
42
42
44
44
42
45
46
46
42
42
42
42
44
43
46
46
43
42


54
38
11
24
17
28
01
42
39
34
31
55
47
10
14
12
20
36
42
51
38
59
50
27
29
16
17
18
17
44
12
29
15
03
59


85
84
85
85
87
83
84
86
85
86
84
84
86
88
88
88
84
83
83
83
85
85
88
90
87
84
84
85
85
85
85
88
84
83
85


40
47
15
23
27
41
48
22
18
02
45
38
07
30
29
30
49
56
53
36
46
04
04
10
39
28
24
34
36
10
46
53
28
20
25


109
69
46
30
46
52
69
66
22
58
71
54
6
1
5
44
53
9
- -
16
28
59
57
60
62
18
18
83
19
39
18
5
44


109
69
46
30
46
69
66
13
58
62
54
6
1
5
44
28
59
57
60
62
83
18
5
X


104
69
46
30
X
46
52
69
66
22
58
71
54
6
1
5
44
53
q
X
16
28
59
57
60
62
18
18
83
19
39
18
5
15
44


109
I X
1
i
5
IX
X
X


109
X
5
X
X


p 15, 1:(98)
p 15, l:(X)
snow depth
(1);
radiation,
humd. and
press. (1)
min. and max
temp., hum.,
(5)
p 15, 1:(X)
p 15, 1:(X)
p 15, 1. (x).#


69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86


Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
SO
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
FO
Co
Co




119


Class


No.


Location


Lat N Long W
deg min deg min


Per I
of Temp
Rec Yrs
Rec


Pcpn
Yrs


Wind
Yrs


-   i            m   i a   I


87
88
8 9
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97(
913
98
99
100
101L
102
10:3
104
105
106
107
108
109


Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
FO
Co
Co
Co
SO
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
SO
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co


MICHIGAN cont.
Lupton
Lupton I mi. SW
Millington 3 mi.
SW
Mio Hydro. Plant
Montague
Montague 2 mio N
Mt. Pleasant Col,
Newaygo Croton


Dam
Newberry State
Hospital


110
111


Niles
Oscoda AFB
Onaway Black L.
Forest
Owosso Swg, Plant
Paw Paw 2 mi. E
Pelston CAA Ap.
Pontiac
Rexton
Rock
Romeo 1 mi. N
Roscommon Forest
Exp. Station
Rose City
Saginaw Center
Radio Station
Saginaw-MidlandBay City CAA Ap
St. Charles
St. Johns 5 mi,
NNW
Sandusky
Scottville 1 mi,
NE
Sebewaing 3 mi..
E
Spalding
Stambaugh
Standish 2 mi. S
Stanton
Stephenson 5 mi,
W
Steuben 2 mi. WN
Suttons Bay 4 mi
NW
Thompsonville
Three Rivers


44
44
43
44
43
43
43
43
46
41
44
45
43
42
45
42
46
46
42
44
44
43
43
43
43
43
43
43
43
46
43
43
45


26
25
14
40
25
27
36
27
20
51
28
25
01
13
34
39
10
04
49
28
26
29


84
84
83
84
86
86
84
85
85
86
83
84
84
85
84
83
85
87
83
84
84
84


Wea     Other
Yrs   (ref:yrs)
evaporation
(7)


02
02
34
08
22
21
47
40
30
16
22
14
11
51
48
18
15
10
01
35
07
02


8
7
57
55
8
16
58
51
60
2
15
63
38
17
71
6
18
24
8
3
62
17
38
40
34
17
5
63
25
3
19
19
19
62


7
55
8
58
51
60
x
63
38
17
71
6
3
62
6
38
40
63
25
X


8
7


57
55
8
16
58
51
60
2
X
15
63
38
17
66
6
18
24
X
8
3
62
17
35
40
34
17
5
63
25
3
19
19
19
19
62


X    X   p 15, 1: (X)


X   X  p 15, 1: (X)


32 841 05


X


X  p 15, 1:(X)


112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119


18
04
25
58
44
43
05
57
17
24


7


84 08
84 35


82 5C
86 16


831 23


83
88
83
85
87


27
38
58
04
43
30
42
56
38


121 Co
121 Co


46   12  86
45  01  85


122 Co
123 Co


44  31  85
41 56   85


62




120


No. Class


Location


Lat N Long W
g indeg min deg mi


Per
of
Rec


Temr Pcpr
Yrs Yrs


Wind Wea
Yrs Yrs


Other
(ref:yrs)


I                                               i                                                             i                                 i                               i


124
125
126
127
128
129
130


131
132


1
2
3
4
5


Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
FO
FO
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
FO
FO
Co
Co
Co
FO


MICHIGAN conto
Trout Lake 2 mi.
ESE
Vanderbilt Trout
Station
Wakefield
Watersmeet Fish
Hatchery
Wellston Tippey
Dam
West Branch
State Forest
Williamston 1 mi
NE
Willis 1 mi. NE
Yale
OHIO
*Akron-Canton Ap
*Akron Municipal
Airport
*Akron Swg. Wks.
*APCO Ravenna
Arsenal
*Ashland 2 mi.
ENE
*Ashland 3 mi. N1
Ashtabula
Botzum Swg. Plant
Bowling Green
Sewage Plant
Bucyrus Swg. P1.
Burton
*Canton Repository
*Canton Hwy. Dpt
Chardon
*Charles Mill
Dam
*Chippewa Lake
Cleveland Airport
Cleveland City
*Columbus Ohio
State Univ.
*Columbus
Sullivant Ave.
*Columbus Valley
Cross
*Columbus Airport


46
45
45
46
44
44
42
42
43
40
41
41
41
40
40
41
41
41
40
41
40
40
41
40
41
41
41
40
39
39
40


11
10
29
18
15
20
41
05
08
55
02
09
10
54
53
51
09
23
48
29
48
48
35
44


84
84
89
89
85
84
84
83
82
81
81
81
81


24
5;
05
1
U
35
4E
26
2;
34
05


82 1U


46
16
20
38
56
22
29
32
11
30
1
11
49
58
8
18
77
65
9
6
19
13
18
63
32
88
74
8
42
28


46
20
29
11
30
11
56
8
64
63
6
13
18
63
32
88
74
8
42
28


X
46
16
20
38
56
22
29
32
11
30
1
11
49
58
8
18
77
65
9
6
19
13
18
63
32
88
74
8
42
28


12  151p 15, 1:(11)
25   2 p 15, 1: (25)


6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22


82
80
81
83
82
81
81
81
81
82
81
81
81
83
83
82
82


22
48
3
38
54
0
23
22
54
51
42
01
05
57
53


05
24
30
00
56
56
00


X
32
88
X
28


32
88
28


evaporation
(X)
p 15, 1:(32J
p 15, 1:(88)
evaporation
(X)
p 15, 1:(28




121


Class


No.


Location


Lat N Long W
deg min deg min


Per
of
Rec


Temp
Yrs


Pcpn
Yrs


Wind Wea
Yrs Yrs


m.  *   a
i~~ i. I                    r - -


OHIO cont.


23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
33
34
35
36
3 7
38
339
40
4L
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
4'9
50
5L
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59


FO
Co
FO
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
SO
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
R
Co
Co
Co
SO
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co


*Columbus City
*Dayton
*Dayton Airport
Defiance
Defiance Pwr. P1
Dorset 2 mi. E
Edgerton
*Ellsworth
Elyria 3 mi. E
Findlay CAA Ap,
Findlay Swg. P1.
Fremont
*Galion Wtr. Wks
*Hiram
Hoytville 2 mi.
NE
Kenton Ohio Pwr.
Co.
*Kenton 2 mi. W
*Lakeview 3 mi.
NE
*La Rue
Lima Swg. Plant
Lima Water Works
Lima Standard
Oil Co.
*Louisville
Lyons High Schoo:
*Mansfield 6 mi.
W
Mansfield CAA Ap,
*Marion Wtr. Wks.
*Marshallville
Montpelier
Napoleon
Norwalk
Oberlin
Painesville Hwy.
Department
Pandora 2 mi. NE
Paulding
Plymouth
Rockford 5 mi.
WNW
Rockford 0.3 mi.
W
St. Marys 2 mi.
W
St. Marys Water
Works


39
39
39
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
40
41
41
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
41
40
40
40
40
41
41
41
41
41
40
41
41
40


58
45
54
17
17
41
27
01
23
01
03
20
43
19
12


83
84
84
84
84
80
84
80
82
83
83
83
82
81
83


00
10
12
23
28
38
44
51
04
40
40
07
47
09
47
37


381 83


39 83
32  83


34
43
45
44
50
42
45
47
36
54
35
23
15
17
43
58
08
00
42


83
84
84
84
81
84
82
82
83
81
84
84
82
82
81
83
84
82
84


39
54
23
07
05
08
16
04
38
32
10
43
36
07
37
13
13
51
35
40
45


79
23
28
54
17
2
17
43
10
17
69
18
12
78
7
17
66
42
40
59
17
12
18
59
15
10
67
72
74
82
19
17
68
25
4


79
23
28
48
2
10
X
69
6
74
7
65
56
x
39
X
X
56
64
64
74
17
63
25


79
23
28
54
17
2
17
43
10
17
69
18
12
78
7
17
66
42
40
59
17
X
12
18
59
X
15
10
67
72
74
82
19
17
68
25
4


x
x


Other
(ref':yrs)
p 15, 1:(79)
evaporation
(X)
p 15, 1:(28)


79
X


79


28   28


X  p 15, 1:(X)


X


p 15, l:(X)


601 Co


401 381 84   481 19


611 Co


40 1 32 84


25
24


84


20
21


19
20
21


621 Co


401 32




122


No,


e


Clas


63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5S
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14


I


Co
Co
FO
Co
FO
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
FO
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co


I.C


>


Location


Lat N  Long W
deg min deg min


Per
of
Rec


Temp
Yrs


Pcpn
Yrs


I_ _


I


i                                              v.    -  -.


-.                                                              I                                                       -


OHIO cont.
S. New Lyme 1 mio
W


Tiffin
Toledo Exp. Ap,
Toledo Blade
Toledo City
Upper Sandusky
Upper Sandusky
Water Works
Van Wert
*Warren
*Warren Ohio
Edison
Wauseon Sewage PL
*Youngstown Ap.
PENNSYLVANIA
*Coudersport
3 mi. NW
*Coudersport
7 mi. E
*Linesville
North East 2 mi,
SE
Springboro
NEW YORK
Albion 3 mi. NE
Alexandria Bay
Alfred
Angelica
Arcade
Arnot Lodge
Arnot SCS
Auburn Wtr. Wkso
Aurora Research
Farm
Avon
Baldwinsville
Batavia
Beaver Falls
Big Moose 3 mi.
E


Wind
Yrs


Wea
Yrs


Other
(ref:yrs)


41
41
41
41
41
40
40
40
41
41


35
07
36
39
40
50
49
52
15
13


80
83
83
83
83
83
83
84
80
80


46
10
48
32
34
17
17
3
5
4E


12
77
4
7
85
75
18
44
69
24


72
4
7
85
74
43
65
88
87
3
7


12
77
4
7
85
75
18
44
69
24
86
16
3
12
41
9


4


41 p 15, 1: (4)


85   851 p 15, 1:(85)


41 33   84 0o
41  16  80  4C


88
87


16 1 '161 p 15.s 1: (16)1


41  491 78   03


41 146 1 77 1 53


41  41   80  31
42   12  79  4S


41 481 801 23


43
44
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
43
43
43
43
42
42


16  78
20  75
15  77
18  78
32   78
16  76
14  76
54  76
44   76


08
55
47
02
2
3E
3
3
3
4
2
1
26
5
5
5
4


3
12
41
9
4
21
27
66
74
36
4
11
95
2
63
60
28
25
28
8
69
19


41   4


21
23
62
74
7
95
2
21
28
8
69


21
27
66
74
36
4
11
89
2
63
60
28
25
28
8
69
19


55
09
00
53
49
13
06
00


77
76
78
75
74
75
75
75


X
2
8


evaporation
(2)




15 FO
16 Co


I


*Binghamton
*Binghamton


81 p 15, 1:(8)


I




171 Co


Black R.   mi. S4 44






123


No


0


2C
21
22
23
-.
24
25
26
27
28
29:- 0
31
31
32
33
34
3 5
36
3 7
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45


L
i
i
7
I
i
I
F
I
I
I
I
I
I


Class


Location


Lat N
deg min


Long W
deg mir


Per
of
Rec


Temp Pcpn Wind Wea
Yrs Yrs Yrs Yrs


7.. —.. -. -. -. -.


i  II  I-  -  Il   C...I


NEW YORK cont.


Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
FO
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
SO
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
FO
Co
Co
Co
Co


Boonville 2 mi.
Boonville 2 mi.
SSW


N


Brewerton Lock 23
Bristol Springs
Brockport 2 mi.
NW
Buffalo Airport
Burdett 1 mi. NE
Camden
Canandaigua 3 mi.
S
Canaserage
Canastota 1 mi.


Other
(ref: yrs)


SW


f


*Candor
*Canton
Cayuga Lock 1
Churchville
*C inc innatus
Clyde Lock 26
Colden
*Colton 3 mi. N
Constantia
*Cortland
Dansville
Delta
Eagle Bay
Eagle Falls
*East Homer 1
*East Homer 2
E lma
E lmira
Elmira CAA Airpor
Forestport
*Franklinville
Fredonia
Freeville 2 mi.
NE
Fulton
Garbutt
Geneva Exp. Sta.
Geneva Sampson
AFB
Gouverneur
Gowanda St. Hosp.
Gravesville 2 mi.


43
43
43
42
43
42
42
43
42
42
43
42
44
42
43
42
43
42
44
43
42
42
43
43
43
42
42
42
42
42
43
42
42
42
43
43
42
42
44
42
43


31
27
14
43
15
56
25
20
51
28
04
14
36
57
06
32
04
40
35
15
36
34
17
46
54
42
43
511
05
10
26
21
26
32
19
01
53
50
20
29
16
24


75
75
76
77
77
78
76
75
77


21
21
12
22
58
44
50
44
17


77 47
75 45




46
i47
48
49
50
51
52
53;54
55
56
57
58


L
i
F
I
)I


76
75
76
77
75
76
78
74
76
76
77
75
74
75
76
76
78
76
76
75
78
79
76
76
77
77
77
75
78
75
77


21
10
44
53
54
50
41
57
00
11
42
27
49
11
07
07
39
48
54
13
27
22
19
25
47
00
00


36
10
27
27
9
108
27
13
27
5
27
15
97
32
5
22
41
2 —
25
7
98
41
40
6
34
19
10
17
80
19
25
10
72
19
33
5
70


10
9
108
25
97
X
98
38
17
79
11
10
72
89
X


36
10
27
27
9
102
27
13
27
5
27
15
92
32
5
22
41
X
25
7
81
41
40
6
34
19
10
17
80
19
25
10
63
19
33
5
70
X


6
X


X


X


evaporation
(X)


881 881p 15, 1:(88)


soil temp.(GX
evaporation
(6)
p 15, 1:(X)
p 15, 1:(X)
humidity (X)


x   I


28   53   22    53
56   14    13   14
07    9     9    9
13    5          5!


N


-5


Hammondsport 1 mil 42


S




124


No


lass


Location


Lat N ILong W


Per
of
pRac


deg min deg mix


I                                                                                                                                 I!                      I


60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100


Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
FO
FO
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co


NEW YORK cont.
Hemlock
Highmarke t
Highmarket 1 mi,
SE
Hilton
Hinckley
*Hoffmeister
Honeoye Falls
Hooker
Horne 1 Almond
Dam
*Indian Lake 2 mi
SW
Ithaca
Cornell Univ.


i  I        i.               1   za — -


Lincklaen
Linden
Locke 4 mi. W
ockport 2 mi, NE
Lowville
Lyons Falls
Macedon
Marcellus SCS
Mays Pt. Lock 25
Mt. Morris 2 mi,
Newark
Newark Valley
New London Lock 22
Ogdensburg Hosp.
3 mio NE
Old Forge 2 mi. St
Ovid
Penn Yan
Prattsburg 2 mi.
NW
Pulaski
Rochester Airport
Rome Griffiss AFB
Rushford 3 mi, SW
Sabattis 3 mio NE
Sabattis Whitney
Park
Saranac Lake
Scio
Sherman
Skaneateles
Sodus 2 mio SSW
S. Edwards 1 mi.


42
43
43
43
43
43
42
43
42
43
42
42
42
42
43
43
43
43
42
43
42
43
42
43
44
43
42
42
42
43
43
43
42
44
44
44
42
42
42
43
44


47
35
35
17
18
23
57
41
21
45
27
41
52
40
11
48
37
04
59
00
44
03
13
12
44
42
40
39
32
34
07
14
22
07
03
19
10
10
57
13
16


77
75
75
77
75
74
77
75
77


74117


76 128


37
31
30
47
07
43
35
45
42


75
78
76
78
75
75
77
76
76
77
77
76
75
75
75
76
77
77
76
77
75
78
74
74
74
77
79
76
77
75


53
10
28
39
29
22
18
23
46
54
06
12
37
27
00
50
04
18
08
20
25
18
40
38
07
59
36
26
04
12


61
35
19
14
41
53
5
27
5
60
41
6
40
27
73
98
45
40
19
40
9
39
4
39
68
12
27
107
18
130
16
5
26
3
29
30
8
65
30
32


remp
Yrs
61
14
14
59
27
67
93
9
68
Li
53
X
129
16
3
29
30


60
40
6
40
27
73
98
45
40
19
40
9
39
4
39
66
12
27
107
18
X
130
16
5
26
3
29
30
8
65
30
32


61
35
19
14
41
53
5
27
5


41


Pcpn
Yrs


Wind Iwea
Yrs Yrs


Other
(ref: yrs)
evap. (41),
sunshine (X)
pressure (X)


88 188  p 15, 1:(88
16  16  p 15, 1:(16)


E




125


Lat N ILong W


Per
of
Recar


No. i Clas.


Location


Temp
Yrs


Pcpn
Yrs


Wind
Yrs


Yrs   (ref:yrs)


deg minldeg mir


J.I.I                                          -,,____                         _ I  i


101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
I
1
2
3
4
5
45
7
8
9
10
1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26


Co
Co
Co
FO
Co
Co
Co
SO
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
II
III
II
II
III
III
II
II
II
I
II
II
II
II
II
II
III
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
III
II


NEW YORK cont.
S. Wales Emery Pk.
Stafford
Stillwater Reserv.
Syracuse Airport
Theresa
*Troupsburg 4 mi.
NE
Truxton
Utica CAA Airport
Wales
Wanakena Ranger
School
Warsaw 5 mi. SW
Waterloo
Watertown
Wellsville
Westfield 2 mi. St
Whitesville
Wiscoy


Wolcott
ONTARIO
Agincourt
Aldershot
Aldershot (HEPC)
Algonquin Park
Alliston
Alloa
Alton
Angus
Apsley
Armstrong
*Atikokan
Barrie
*Bear Island
Beatrice
Beaver ton
Beeton
Benny
Bingham Chute
Biscotasing
Black Sturgeon Lk
Bradford
Brampton
Brantford
Brockville
Broddytown
Brucefield


42
42
43
43
44
42
42
43
42
44
42
42
43
42
42
42
42
43
43
43
43
45
44
43
43
44
44
50
48
44
46
45
44
44
46
46
47
49
44
43
43
44
43
43


43
59
53
07
13
04
43
09
45
09
41
54
58
07
17
02
30
14
47
18
18
35
08
43
51
19
46
18
44
24
59
08
25
06
31
06
17
20
06
41
08
33
37
33


78
78
75
76
75
77
76
75
78
74
78
76
75
77
79
77
78
46,
79
79
79
78
79
79
80,
79,
78
88
91
79
80
76
79
79
81
79
82
88
79
79
80
75
79
81


36
05
02
07
47
29
02
23
31
54
12
52
52
57
37
46
05
16
54
52
33
58
52
05
52
05
55
38
41
05
16
09
47
38
24
07
50
30
46
16
40
36
33


28
28
38
71
18
18
19
19
17
49
7
36
69
3
43
5
19
20
--
S -
- -
- -
- -
-.
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -


28
28
32
71
X
48
7
67
38
19
X
X
31
51
X
X
24
34
50
X
61
X
X
34
X
X
X
62
33
4,'


28
28
38
62
18
18
19
19
17
49


62 162


x


x


7
36
69
3
43
5
19
20


p 15, 1:(62)
p 15, 1:(X)


x
X
X
31
X
X
51
X
X
24
34
56
X
66
X
X
X
X
34
X
X
62
X
X
45


50


94 1X ip 15, l:(X)




126




i
i


No. Clasf




I


Location


Lat N
deg min


Long W
deg min


Per
of
Rec


Tem
Yrs





-


27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72


III
II
II
III
II
II
I
I
II
II
II
III
II
I
III
II
II
II
II
II
III
III
III
III
II
III
II
II
III
III
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
I
III
I
III
III
III




I
I
I
I
I
I


ONTARIO cont.
Burnhamthorpe
Caledonia
Cameron Falls
Campbellford
Canboro
Caramat
Centralia
*Chalk River
Chapleau
Chatham


i                                                                         i


1


-1 --- —-----


Chatham (CFCO)
Chatsworth
Clarkson
Clear Creek
Clifford
Coe Hill
Coldwater
Coniston
Crystal Falls
Delhi
Dog Lake Dam
*Domville
Dona
Doon
Dorset
Dunnvil le
Durham
*Earlton
Eugenia
Fenelon Falls
Fergus
*Foleyet
Forest
Franz
Galt
Georgetown
*Geraldton
*Geraldton (HEPC)
Gilmour
Glencoe
Gooderham
Gore's Landing
*Graham
Green River
Grey Co. Forest
Grimsby (Rock
Chapel)


43
43
49
44
42
49
43
46
47
42
42
44
43
42
43
44
44
46
46
42
48
44
48
43
45
42
44
47
44
44
43
48
43
48
43
43
49
49
44
42
44
44
49
43
44
43


37
06
09
18
59
37
18
00
50
23
23
24
33
35
57
53
42
28
27
52
05
47
30
24
15
55
13
42
18
23
48
15
06
27
22
38
42
46
51
42
55
08
16
54
07
09


79
79
88
77
79
86
81
77
83
82?I
)I
f,
I
i".I


36
57
21
48
35
09
31
26


25
12


82
80
79
80
80
77
79
80
79
80
89
75
89
80
78
79
80
79
80
78
80
82
82
84
80
79
86
86
77
81
78
78
90
79
80
79


I I


I
I
4
4


12
54
37
34
58
50
40
49
55
32
38
32
31
27
53
42
48
51
33
44
20
26
00
24
19
55
53
57
56
42
23
13
35
11
48
42


X
25
X
X
X
20
35
59
X
X
X
X
X
X
x
x
x
x
16
X
X
x
30
X
44
X
X
X
X
IC


p


Pcp]
Yrs
X
X
25
X
X
X
X
21
35
71
X
X
X
r
x
I%
Ir
X
X
IC
X
x
x
x
x
x
X
16
34
z%
Nr
30
X,
XI
CX
XI


n


11.,I
1
ILe,,
II,,I,,
111,,
II,,
~II)
OI
II
rcr)



X
50
X
60
X


Wine
Yrs


Wea
Yrs


---— I —I ---

Other
(ref:yrs)


X
X
X
X


p 15, l:(X)
sunshine
(21);
p 15, 1:(X)
sunshine
(21)
p 15, l:(X)
sunshine
(21)
p 15, 1:(X)
p 15, 1:(X)




127


No. IClass


Location


Lat N Long W
deg min deg mir


Per
of
Rec


Temp Pcpn
Yrs Yrs


I-I-I-I ri

Wind
Yrs
105


73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81.
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
1014
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116


III
II
II
II
II
II
III
III
II
II
III
II
II
II
III
II
I
II
II
III
II
II
I
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
I
II
III
II
III
II
III
III
II
III


ONTARIO cont.
Guelph
Hagersville
Haliburton
Haliburton (2)
Harrow
Helen Mine
Holstein
Hopeville
Hornby
*Hornepayne
Huntsville
Ilderton
Jarvis Lake
Kakabeka Falls
Kemptville
*Kenogami Dam
Killala
*Killaloe
Kohler
Lafontaine
Lakeport
Lindsay
Listowel
London
*Longlac
*Longlac (P & P)
Long Lake Control
Dam
Long Point
Lucan
Lucknow
Macdiarmid
McVittie
*Madawaska
Magnetawan
Malton
Manitou Falls
*Mattagami Lake
Dam
Melville
Meyersburg
Midhurst
Mildmay
Miller Lake For.
Millgrove
Mink Lake


43
43
45
45
42
48
44
44
43
49
45
43
49
48
45
49
49
45
42
44
43
44
43
43
49
49
49
42
43
43
49
46
45
45
43


33
00
01
03
02
04
03
05
33
14
19
07
15
24
02
55
09
34
56
45
59
20
45
02
45
45
05
33
11
58
26
17
30
40
41


80
80
78
78
82
84
80
80
79
84
79
81
87
89
75
86
86
77
79
80
77
78
80
81
86
86
87
80
81
81
88
80
77
79
79


16
03
28
29
53
45
46
34
50
51
15
23
49
7
39
28
28
24
52
05
55
44
58
09
30
30
03
03
24
31
09
52
59
38
38
06
33
03
48
44
07
25
56
04


55
57
X
31
X
X
31
41
X
ix
41
X
X
16
X
X
68
X
65
29
X
X
X
X
58
X
X
X
X
17
X
X
X
X
K
K


I


55
X
57
X
31
X
X
X
X
31
41
X
X
41
X
X
X
16
X
X
X
68
X
65
29
X
X
X
X
58
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
K


Other
(ref:yrs)
sunshine
(34)
sunshine
(32)
p 15, 1:(X)
sunshine
(68)
p 15, l:(X)
humidity (X)
p 15, 1:(X)


50 X


52   X


45


69 1


49  12  86
48  01  81


43
44
44
44
45
43
47


55
17
27
03
05
21
01


80
77


79
81
81
79
82




128


No,
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163


I


I




Class
II
II
II
III
III
I
I
II
I
II
II
II
II
I
II
I
II
II
II
II
II
II
III
III
II
II
II
II
II
III
II
III
II
II
II
II
II
I
II
II
II
III
II
II
II
III
II
a'


I


Location
ONTARIO cont.
Mitchell
Montreal Falls
*Montreal River
*Moose Lake
Morriston
Muskoka
*Nakina
North Bay
North Bay (A)
Oak Ridges
Oil City
Orillia




I


Lat N
deg mir
I


I


TPer
Long W er
deg mi of
g Rec


Temp Pcpn Wind Wea
Yrs Yrs Yrs Yrs


Other
(ref yrs)


m








Orono
*Ottawa (Uplands)
Oxaline Lake
*Pagwa
Pays Plat
Pefferlaw
Peshu Lake
Peterboro
Peterboro (HEPC)
Peters Corners
Petrolia
Pine Portage
*Port Elmsley
Portland
Preston
*Quorn
Ragged Rapids
Ramsay
Ranger Lake
Rayner
Red Cedar Lake
Dam
Redickville
*Rideau Ferry
Ridge town
Ridgeville
*Rockcliffe
Rue
St, Catherines
St. Catherines
(Path. Lab,)
Sto Joachim
Sto Thomas
Sand Lake
Sauble Forest
Scotia Junction
Simcoe




43
47
47
48
43
44
50
46
46
43
42
44
43
45
49
50
49
44
46
44
44
43
42
49
44
44
43
49
45
46
46
46
46
44
44
42
43
45
47
43
43
42
42
47
44
45
42


I


28
15
07
50
28
58
11
19
22
58
55
37
59
20
42
02
43
19
37
17
20
17
57
18
53
42
40
25
01
58
55
27
41
13
51
26
04
28
18
09
10
10
48
47
41
31
52




81
84
79
91
80
79
86
79
79
79
82
79
78
75
87
85
87
79
83
78
78
80
82
88
76
76
80
90
79
82
83
83
80
80
76
81
79
75
81
79
79
82
81
84
81
79
80


i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
4


11
24
29
36
07
19
42
28
25
28
02
24
35
41
34
16
34
13
10
19
19
04
05
19
08
12
25
05
40
21
30
23
01
13
09
55
08
38
27
17
17
38
11
32
15
17
20


I


x
x
37
16
16
28
L6
30
X
49
Xt
76
X
16
X
X
X
66
X
X
X
X
33
X
X
X
X
14
33
33
X
X
X
32


x
x
37
X
K
X
16
16
34
16
30
X
49
X
76
X


16,ix
IX
X
71
X
X
X
X
x
X
X
x
x
x
33
X
x
x
x
x
x
x
X
X
X
X
X
14
33
32
X
X
x
x
x
X
X
32


52
57
60
90
72
52
X


I                           I                             I                           I                      I~


I


x
X
K


p 15,: (X)
humidity (X);
p 15, 1: (X)
p 15, 1:(X)
sunshine (29
sunshine (53:


X p 15, 1:(X)


X lp 15,: (X)


sunshine (21


I




I




I




I




I




I




I




129


ILat N


Long W
deg mir


No I ClasE


Location


Per
of
Re c


Temf Pcpn Win Wer
Yrs Yrs Yrs Yrs


Other
(ref: yrs)


deg minI


I- --


-  I-    I +-rf+  -   fI


164
165
166
167
168
169
170
17L
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
18
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
19l
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201


II
II
III
II
I
II
II
I
III
III
II
III
II
III
III
II
II
III
II
III
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
III
III
III
II
II
I
I
II
II
II


ONTARIO con t
Smithfield
Smoky Falls
Snelgrove
Stayner
Stirling
Stratford
Strathroy
Sudbury
Talbotville
Toronto (Downsview South)
Toronto (East
York)
Toronto (Glenview)
Toronto (Islington West)
Toronto (Kingsway)
Toronto (Scarlett
Road)
Toronto (South
Leaside)
Toronto (Wexford)
Toronto (Willowdale)
Toronto (Wilson
Heights)
Trethewey Falls
Turbine
Tweed


44
50
43
44
44
43
42
46
42
43
43
43
43
43
43
43
43
46
43
44
46
44
43
49
44
43
44
42
44
44
42
43
42
48
42
43
42
43


05
04
45
28
19
23
58
29
48
43
42
42
39
39
40
42
45
1 47
47
44
59
23
30
52
03
07
10
03
35
47
35
58
28
59
35
17
50
13
08


77
82
79
80
77
81
81
80
81
79


40
10
50
06
38
00
38
59
15
29


79120


79 27
79 33


79 31
79 30


79122


79 18
79 26


X
x
x
X
15
x
27
x
I
34
I
X
X
X
33
41
X
56
62
X
X
76


79126


x


v
ix
15
K
ix
27
K
K


55
X


Unionville
*Upsala
Uxbridge
Vineland
Walkerton


'Wallaceburg
Wasdells
Washago
Waterford
Waterloo
Welland
White River
Windsor
Woodbridge
Woodslee
Woodstock


79
81
77
79
90
79
79
81
82
79
79
80
80
79
85
82
79
82
80


17
34
19
20
28
06
19
09
24
18
20
17
27
17
17
58
36
42
47


x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
34
X
X
X
X
X
33
41
56
62
59
76


x
x
X
X
x


p 15, 1:(X)
p 15, 1:(X)


sunshine (351


70
55
18


sunshine (301


p 15, 1:(X)
p 15, 1:(X)


sunshine (581




130
IIIo Table 3
The facilities listed in Table 3 are those that were uncovered
by the project but which were adjudged to be unsuitable for inclusion
in Tables 1 or 2. One of three situations described the reason for
deletion. Most of the sources were contacted, but the data recorded by
the installations were of such short record or of such a nature that
there was no immediate future use deemed possible for it by the investigators. These cases are listed in the first column. In a few cases,
data of interest to the project are taken, but for technical reasons,
such as intake location or instrument exposure, they were considered unrepresentative. These are shown in the second column. In a few cases
the existence of potential data sources was determined, but for a
variety of reasons no contact with source authoritiesas possible,
Only 16 cases of this type occurred -- 1.4 per cent of the total of 1177
sources O




131


Table 3. Unusable Data Sources


Location


Installation


No
Few or   Data Not  o
No Data Repres.    tact'
tact'


_....... I..... - F,-~~~ — -~ — 1-~-~ --- —------- — ~-~ —  -I-~-~-~-~ ~ — ~- -— 


Red Rock, Ont,
Port Arthur, Onto
Port Arthur, Ont,
Grand Marais, Ont.
Two Harbors, Minn,
Ontonagon, Mich.
Eagle River, Mich.
Eagle Harbor, Mich.
Copper Harbor, Mich.
Gay, Mich,
Pequaming, Mich.
Sault Ste, Marie, Ont.
Nahma, Mich.
Waukegan, Ill,
Great Lakes NTS
Wintnetka, Ill.
East Chicago, Ind.
Indiana Harbor, Ind.
Ludington, Mich.
Muskegon, Miqh.
Essexville, Mich.
Traverse City, Mich.
Alpena, Mich.
East: Tawas, Mich.
Lorain, Ohio
Painesville, Ohio
Ashtabula, Ohio


St. Lawrence Corp.
Abitibi Pulp & Paper Co.
Provincial Paper Co.
water treatment plant
municipal power plant
water treatment plant
water treatment plant
water treatment plant
water treatment plant
water treatment plant
water treatment plant
Algoma Steel Co.
water treatment plant
Commonwealth Edison Co.
power plant
municipal power plant
water treatment plant
Youngstown Sheet & Tube
Company
Dow Chemical Co.
Consumers Power Co.
Consumers Power Co.
municipal power plant
Huron Portland Cement Co.
water treatment plant
National Tube Co.
Industrial Rayon Corp.
Union Carbide and Carbon
Corp.
Pennsylvania Elec. Co.
water treatment plant
water treatment plant
Republic Steel Co.
water treatment plant
water treatment plant
water treatment plant
water treatment plant
water treatment plant
water treatment plant
water treatment plant
water treatment plant
water treatment plant
water treatment plant
water treatment plant
General Motors of Canada
Oshawa Public Utilities
Steel Co. of Canada
Upper Peninsula
Generating Co.
Produce Terminal Co.


X
x
X
KI
K


x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x


x


x
K


X
X
X


x
X
K


x
X
X


Erie, Penn.
Dunkirk, N. Y.
Buffalo, N. Y.
Buffalo, N. Y.
Wilson, N, Y.
Newfane, N. Y.
Barker, N. Y.
Lynconville, N. Y.
Brockport, N Y.
Hilton, N. Y.
Williamson, N. Y.
Sodus Point, N. Y.
Wolcott, No Y.
Oswego, N. Y.
Sacketts Harbor, N.
Oshawa, Ont.
Oshawa, Ont.
Hamilton, Ont.
(unknown)


x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X


Y.


x
x
X
X
X
X


(unknown)




5,  SUMMARY


The entire Great Lakes drainage basin was reviewed for sources of
hydrographic and meteorological data, potentially applicable to studies
of Great Lakes hydrography and fisheries.  Agencies which were found to
obtain either or both of these types of data were: water treatment
plants; power plants; industrial concerns; U. S. Coast Guard; paper mills;
Sanitary District Observers; U. S. Weather Bureau First Order, Second
Order and Cooperative stations; Canadian Meteorological Division Class
1, II, III, and c stations; U. S. Lake Survey; Canadian Hydrographic
Service; U. S. Geological Survey; Canadian Department of Northern Affairs
and National Resources, Water Resources Branch; independent research
installations; and several miscellaneous uncategorized agencies.
Tables 4 and 5 present a summarization of knowledge of data sources
appearing in Tables 1, 2, and 3, Table 4, entitled Summary of
Knowledge of All Potential Data Sources, indicates the number and per
cent of agencies contained within each source type that have usable or
unusable data and those agencies with which no contact was possible
(no contact),  Following the format utilized throughout this report,
these agencies have been categorized as either onshore or inland. Entries
appearing in the usable column have been derived from Tables 1 and 2.
Entries in the unusable column have been derived from the first two
columns of Table 3, and entries in the no contact column, from the third
column of Table 3.
For example, 97 water treatment plants were located which utilize
Great Lakes water. These plants constituted 8.3 per cent of the total
potential sources located. Of these, 73 (75 per cent) possessed usable
data, 22 (23 per cent) possessed no data of use to the purposes of this
investigation, and 2 (2 per cent) could not, for various reasons, be
adequately ascertained.
A total of 1177 separate possible data sources were located in the
drainage basin. Of the total, slightly less than half (44.2 per cent)
are located within two miles  of  the Lake shores (onshore), whereas
55.8 per cent are more than two miles from the shoreline (inland),
A high percentage of all onshore agencies have proved to possess
apparently usable meteorological and/or hydrographic data, namely, 91
per cent; only 6 per cent of the reviewed data is unusable and 3 per cent
is  for   plants with which no contact was established.
The percentage distribution of onshore agencies by type of installation is of interest as shown in Table 4. The Coast Guard, meteorological
substations, and water treatment plants all represent, numerically, data
sources of the same order of magnitude. The numbers of data to be
found in power plants and industries, and from the U. S. Lake Survey and
the Canadian Hydrographic Service are each about half of the percentage
represented by the aforementioned three source types. Other meteorological sources and the Sanitary District Observers are, in turn, nearly
equal and each less than half the percentage of the latter two source
types. There are very few paper mills, research, and special organizations that were uncovered as data sources by the project (together
about 1 per cent of the total).


132




133


Table 4


Summary of Knowledge of All Pot:ential Data Sources
NO
UNUSABLE    CONTACT
No. 7      No. %


TYPE OF INSTALLATION


USABLE
No. %


TOTAL
No.   %


ONSHORE
Water treatment plants
Power plants and industries
U. S. Coast Guard
Paper mills
Sanitary District Observers
U. S. Weather Bureau 1st & 2nd
Order, U.S. Naval & Air Force
Bases, Canadian Meteorological
Division I
U. S. Weather Bureau Cooperatives, Canadian Meteorological Division II, III, c
U. S. Lake Survey, Canadian
Hydrographic Service
Other (research, individuals)


73
34
124
3
21


75
62
100
50
100


22
10
0
0
0


23
18
0
0
0
O
O


2
11
0
3
0


2
20
0
50
0


97
55
124
6
21


8.3
4.7
10.5
0.5
1.8


24 100
132 100


O  0   0  0
0      0 0 0


24   2.0
132 11.2


55
6


100
100


0
0


0
0


0
0


0
0


55
6


4.7
0.5


—  — I-  --- - -

TOTAL ONSHORE


472  90.8


32   6.2  16   3.0


520 44.2


INLAND
U. S. Weather Bureau 1st & 2nd
Order, U.S. Naval & Air Force
Bases, Canadian Meteorological
Division I
U. S. Weather Bureau Cooperatives, Canadian Meteorological Division II, III, c
Research installations


67 100


0   0      0  0


67  5.7


585
5


100
100


0
0


0
0


0
0


0
0


585
5


49.7
0.4


TOTAL INLAND                          657 100         0    0       0    0     657   55.8.......


TOTAL ONSHORE AND INLAND
SOURCES


1129 95~.9


32   2.7   16   1.4


1177 100.0




134


The 657 inland sources are, with the exception of five research installations, Uo S. Weather Bureau, U. S. Naval Air, U. S. Air Force, or
Canadian Meteorological Division stations.  Data for all stations are
usable, and all except those taken by the research groups are published.
The USWB Cooperatives and CMD Class II, III, and c stations
comprise by far the largest single source of data ascertained by the
projects This source represents half of the total number of hydrographic
and meteorological stations existing within the Great Lakes watershed.
Data recorded by these stations, while few in variety, are basic to
future studies that may examine applicability of meteorological
parameters to hydrographic and fisheries problems.
Table 5, entitled Summary of Knowledge of Usable Data Sources,
presents a breakdown of sources from which data of apparent use to
studies of Great Lakes hydrography and meteorology are available. Entries in this table have, as in Table 4, been categorized as onshore or
inland, and are presented in terms of absolute number and per cent of
total for each type agency.
The principal difference between Table 5 and Table 4 is the effect
of the 47 water and power plant installations for which there were
few usable data or with which no contact was established. These are
not accounted for in Table 5 which shows the percentage distribution
for usable data sources only. The reduction in numbers is reflected by
the drop from 8.3 per cent in Table 4 to 6.5 per cent of the total in
Table 5. Power plant and industries percentage took an even greater
proportionate drop since 21 of the 55 plants possessed few usable data
or else no contact could be established with plant personnel.
The results of this investigation are displayed in Tables 1, 2, and
3. The following data sources are not included in the Tables for
reasons given on p. 110:
1. 1River discharge information obtainable from the U. S.
Geological Survey and Canada Department of Northern
Affairs and National Resources.
2. Information relating to meteorological observations
obtained by lake freighters and other vessels.
Table 1 lists the sources of usable hydrographic and/or meteorological data that are located within two miles of the lake shores.
Table 2 lists the sources of usable meteorological data located
more than two miles from the lake shores, but within the confines of the
Great Lakes drainage basin. There are certain exceptions, namely, 126
U. S. Weather Bureau and Canadian Meteorological Division weather
stations which lie just outside the limits of the drainage bqsin, but
have been included in the compilation to provide more complete coverage
in certain areas.
Table 3 lists the potential sources which were investigated and
found to possess no usable data. This table also includes those agencies
with which suitable liason or contact could not be established.




135


Table 5
Summary of Knowledge of Usable Data Sources


TYPE OF INSTALLATION


FREQUENCY OF USABLE DATA SOURCES
No.         %


ONSHORE
''~  ':~....1


Water treatment plants


73
34


6.5


Power plants and industries
U. S. Coast Guard
Paper mills
Sanitary District Observers
U. S. Weather Bureau 1st & 2nd
Order, U. S. Naval & Air Force
Bases, Canadian Meteorological
Division I
U. S. Weather Bureau Cooperatives,
Canadian Meteorological Division
II, III, c
U. S. Lake Survey, Canadian
Hydrographic Service
Other (research, individuals)


124


3


21
24


3.0
11.0
0.3
1.9
2.1
11.7
4.9
0.5


132


55
6


--


TOTAL ONSHORE
INLAND
U, S. Weather Bureau 1st & 2nd
Order, U. S. Naval & Air Force
Bases, Canadian Meteorological
Division I
U. S. Weather Bureau Cooperatives,
Canadian Meteorological Division
II, ILI, c


472


41.9


67


5.9
51.8


585


Research installations


0.4


TOTAL INLAND                                     657         58.1


TOTAL ONSHORE AND INLAND SOURCES


1129


100.0




136
Figure 8 is a histogram of the information contained in Table 4.
The contribution of each type of data source is shown by percentage
frequency distribution. The open portion of each bar indicates the
percentage of usable sources, and the shaded portions indicate the
percentages of unusable and "no contact" sources.
Figure 9, also a histogram, summarizes the percentage of usable,
unusable, and no contact sources for (1) the onshore sources, (2) the
inland sources, and (3) the total sources for the entire drainage basin*
A bibliography is appended to this report which gives references
on the subjects of hydrography and meteorology as they pertain to
potentially applicable scientific problems of the Great Lakes.




50
40


-4


\\\\ = Undetermined data sources
//// - Unusable data sources
Open U Usable data sources


Cor
cn
0
E-t
404
H
rnr
Ca
N


30


10
Water
Treat.
Plant


USCG


Power
Plant,
Indust.


Paper    Sani-    USWB    USWB     U. S.    Other
Mills    tary     Coop.,    1st    Lake
Dist.    CMD      Order,   Survey,
Obs.   II,III,c   CMD I    Can.
Hydro.
Serv.
ONSHORE DATA SOURCES


USWB
1st
Order,
CMD I


USWB
Coop.,
CMD
II,III,c


I  _
Research
Inst.


INLAND DATA SOURCES


Figure 8. Per cent frequency of all potential data sources.




100
90
80


to
00


I


Co
z
0
H
E-4
a
P4


70
60
50
40
30
20
10


i. i i


A                               I


-- -  I.II I I-ll l  I II


___


I        I                             I


Usable    Unusable    No Contact
ONSHORE DATA SOURCES




Usable     Unusable   No Contact
INLAND DATA SOURCES


Usable    Unusable   No Contact
TOTAL DATA SOURCES


Figure 9. Summary of knowledge of all potential data sources.




Appendix


BIBLIOGRAPHY
Lake  Superior
Adams, C. C., 1909. Isle Royale as a biotic environment. Rept. St. Bd.
Geol. Surv. Mich. (1908):1-56.
Eddy, S., 1934. A study of fresh-water plankton communities. Bull.
Univ. Ill,, 31(45), Ill. Biol. Monog., 12(4):93 pp.
1943. Limnological notes on Lake Superior. Proc. Minn. Acad.
Sci., 11:34-39.
Mather, W. W., 1848. Notes and remarks connected with meteorology on
Lake Superior, and on the variations in its level by barometric causes,
and variations in the season. Am. Jour. Sci. Arts, 2d. Ser., 6(16):1-20.
McLaughlin, A. J., 1912. Sewage pollution of interstate and international
waters with special reference to the spread of typhoid fever. II.
Lake Superior and St. Marys River. III. Lake Michigan and the
Straits of Mackinac. IV. Lake Huron, St. Clair River, Lake St. Clair,
and the Detroit River. V. Lake Ontario and St. Lawrence River. U. S.
Treasure Dept., Hyg. Lab., Bull. (83):296 pp.
Michigan Water Resources Commission, 1954. Great Lakes water temperatures at municipal sources along Michigan's shoreline. Mich. Water
Res. Comm.:50 pp.
Nichols, W. R., 1883. On the temperature of fresh-water ponds and lakes.
Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist. (1880-1882), 21:53-82.
Odenbach, F. L., 1905. Some temperatures taken on Lake Huron and
Superior in July and August of 1904. Monthly Weather Rev., 33:154.
Pettis, C. R., 1940. Typical quantitative analysis as applied to Lake
Superior. Hydrology of the Great Lakes —A symposium. Trans. Am. Soc.
Civil Engrs., 105(2074):795-806.
Ruschmeyer, 0. R., T. A. Olson, and H. M. Bosch, 1957. Lake Superior
study, summer of 1956, with a memorandum and recommendations by A. C.
Redfield and a detailed literature review by T. Odlaug. In: Summary of
report —preliminary limnological study. School of Public Health,
Univ. Minn. Mimeographed.
Schaller, W. T., 1915. The supposed vanadic acid from Lake Superior is
copper oxide. Am. Jour. Sci., 4th. Ser., 39(232):404-406.


1 3nt




140


Smith, S. I., and A. E. Verrill, 1871. Notice of the invertebrata dredged
in Lake Superior in 1871, by the U. S. Lake Survey, under the direction
of Gen. C. B. Comstock, S. I. Smith Naturalist. Am. Jour. Sci. Arts,
3d. Ser., 2:448.
Smith, S. I,, 1871. Preliminary report on the dredgings in Lake Superior.
Rept, (U. S.) Sec. War (1871), Pt. 2:1-7.
_..._., 1871. Dredging in Lake Superior under the direction of the
U. S. Lake Survey. Am. Jour. Scio Arts, 3d. Ser,, 2:373-374.
____, 1871. The fauna of Lake Superior at great depths. Am. Nat.,
5:722., 1874. The crustacea of the fresh waters of the United States.
Rept. U. S. Comm. Fish. (1872-1873), Pt. 2:637-665.._, 1874. Sketch of the invertebrate fauna of Lake Superior. Rept.
U. S. Comm. Fish, (1872-1873), Pt. 2:690-707.
Taylor, W. Ro, 1935. Phytoplankton of Isle Royale. Trans. Am. Micr.
Soc., 54(2):83-97.
Teschemacher, J. E., 1851. On the vanadium minerals from Lake Superior.
Am. Jour. Scio, 2d. Ser., 11(32):233-234.
U. S. Commission of Fish and Fisheries, 1899. Lake Superior. Rept.
U. S. Comm. Fish. (1898), Pt. 24:CXLII-CXLIII.
Whittlesey, C., 1851. On the superficial deposits of the northwestern
part of the United States. Proc. Am. Assoc. Adv. Sci., 5:54-59.
Wright, S., 1931. Bottom temperatures in deep lakes. Science, N. S.,
74 (1921):413.
Lake Michigan
Anonymous, 1925. The technical bases for the recommendations of the
Board of Review. Pt. 2. Rept. Eng. Bd. Rev., Sanitary District
Chicago, on the lake lowering controversy and a program of remedial
measures.:109 pp.
_  1954. Great Lakes fishery investigations. Fishery and
limnological survey of southern Lake Michigan ("Cisco" Cruise V).
Com. Fish. Rev., 16(10):25-26.
___, 1954. Great Lakes fishery investigations. Experimental gillnetting and trawling in southern Lake Michigan ("Cisco" Cruises VI
and VII),  Con. Fish. Rev., 16(11):29-31.
_1955.  Great Lakes fishery investigations: Fewer chubs found in
shallow Lake Michigan water during fall ("Cisco" Cruises X and XI).
Con. Fish. Rev., 17(2):24-25.




141,_ 1955. Great Lakes fishery investigations: Fishery conditions
in northern Lake Michigan explored by "Cisco" (Cruises 3, 4, 5, 6).
Com. Fish. Rev., 17(10):51-53.
_____.   1955. Great Lakes fishery investigations: Survey of northern
Lake Michigan continued by "Cisco" (Cruise 9). Comn Fish. Rev.,
17(11):31-32,
___, 1956. Great Lakes fishery investigations: "Cisco" returns
from survey trip of northern Lake Michigan (Cruise 11). Com. Fish.
Rev., 18(1):26-27.
____, 1956. Great Lakes fishery investigations, M/V "Cisco" tries
to locate summer grounds of walleye in Lake Huron (Cruise 5), Lake
Huron investigations continued by M/V "Cisco" (Cruise 6). Comr Fish.
Rev., 18(11):38-39.
Babcock, H. H,, 1871.  On the effect of the reversal of current of the
Chicago river on the hydrant water,  The Lens.
Bading, G. A,, 1909. Water conditions at Milwaukee. In: 1st. Rept.
Lake Micho Water Comm., by E. Bartow, H. E. Barnard, and F. W.
Shumway: 36-39.
Barnard, H. E., and J. H, Brewster, 1909.  The character of the water
supply of Michigan City, Indo In: 1st. Rept. Lake Mich. Water Comm.,,
by E. Bartow, H. E. Barnard, and F. W. Shumway:133-189.
-_, 1909. The sanitary condition of the southern end of Lake
Michigan, bordering Lake County, Indiana. In: 1st. Rept. Lake Mich.
Water Comm., by E. Bartow, H. E. Barnard, and F. W. Shumway:191-266.
Bartow, E,, 1909. Report on water conditions in Illinois. In: 1st.
Rept. Lake Mich, Water Comm., by E, Bartow, H, E. Barnary, and F. W.
Shumway:40-62,
-     I, 1909. Methods of water analysis. In: 1st. Rept. Lake Mich.
Water Comm,, by E. Bartow, H. E. Barnard, and F. W. Shumway:96-108.
____, 1911. Chemical and biological survey of the waters of Illinois
(1909 and 1910). Water Survo Ser. (8), Bull. Univ. Ill., 8(23):148 pp.
_. _, and L. E  Birdsall, 1911. Composition and treatment of Lake
Michigan water. 2d. Rept. Lake Mich, Water Comm. (1911):69-86.
Bartow, Eo, 1912. Chemical and biological survey of the waters of
Illinois (1911),  Water Surv. Ser. (9), Bull. Univ. Ill., 9(20):173 pp.
Baylis, J. R,, and H. M. Gerstein, 1929. Micro-organisms in the lake
water at Chicago. Municipal News and Water Works, 76:291-296.
Birge, E. A., 1882,  Notes on crustacea in Chicago water supply with remarks on the formation of the carapace. Chicago Med. Jour. and
Examiner (1881), 43:584-590,




142


Bowles, J. T-Bo, 1909. Investigation of typhoid fever epidemic at
Sheboygan, Wisconsin. In: lst. Repto Lake Mich. Water Comm., by E.
Bartow, H. E. Barnard, and Fo W. Shumway:90-95.
Church, P. Eo, 19420 The annual temperature cycle of Lake Michigano I.
Cooling from late autumn to the terminal point, 1941-42. Univ. Chicago
Inst. Meteorol,, Misc. Rept. (4):48 ppo........  1945. The annual temperature cycle of Lake Michigan. II.
Spring warming and summer stationary periods, 1942. Univ. Chicago Dept.
Meteorol., Misc. Rept. (18):100 pp.
____,  1945. Steam-fog over Lake Michigan. Trans. Am. Geophys.
Union, 26:353... —, 1946. The annual temperature cycle in Lake Michigan, Trans.
Am. Geophys. Union, 27:109-110o
Crohurst, H. Ro, and M. V. Veldee, 1927. Report of an investigation of
the pollution of Lake Michigan in the vicinity of South Chicago and
the Calumet and Indiana Harbors, 1924-1925. U. S. Publ. Health Bull.
(170):134 pp.
Domogalla, Bo P., Eo B. Fred, and W. H. Peterson, 1926. Seasonal
variations in the ammonia and nitrate content of lake waters. Jour.
Am. Water Works Assoc,, 15(4):369-385.
Eddy, S., 1927. The plankton of Lake Michigan. Bull. Ill1 St. Div. Nat.
Hist, Surv., 17(4):203-232.
Eggleton, F. E,, 1936. The deep-water bottom fauna of Lake Michigan.
Pap. Mich, Acad. Sci, Arts, Lett. (1935), 21:599-612.
___., 1937. Productivity of the profundal benthic zone in Lake
Michigan. Pap. Mich. Acad. Sci. Arts, Letto (1936), 22:593-611.
Evans, W. A., 1909. Lake Michigan water for drinking purposes. Jour.
Am. Med. Assoc., 53:1091-1093.
Gehrmann, A., 1909. An experiment in chemical purification of water,
In: 1st. Rept. Lake Mich. Water Comm., by E. Bartow, Ho E. Barnard,
and F. W. Shumway:120-124.
Goddard, L. Wo, 1916. Currents in Lake Michigan. Paper presented before
Grand Rapids(Mich.) Eng. Soc., May 24, 1916.
Griffith, R. Eo, 1955. Analysis of phytoplankton yields in relation to
certain physical and chemical factors of Lake Michigan. Ecol.,
36(4):543-552.
Hoy, Po Ro, 1872. Deep-water fauna of Lake Michigan. Trans. Wis. Acad.
Sci. Arts, Lett, (1870-1872), 1:98-101.
Kofoid, C, Ao, 1896. A report upon the Protozoa observed in Lake
Michigan and the inland lakes in the neighborhood of Charlevoix, during
the summer of 1894. App. 2 to: A biological examination of Lake




143


Michigan in the Traverse Bay region, by H. B. Ward. Bull. Mich. Fish
Comm. (6):76-84.
Lackey, J. B., 1944. Quality and quantity of plankton in the south end
of Lake Michigan in 1942. Jour. Am. Water Works Assoc., 36:669-674.
Lapham, I. A., 1844.  Wisconsin: A geographical and topographical
description of Wisconsin with brief sketches of its history, geology,
mineralogy, natural history, etc.:158-167. Milwaukee.
Lauff, G. H., 1957. Some aspects of the physical limnology of Grand
Traverse Bay. Publication no, 2, Great Lakes Research Institute, Univ.
Mich.:56 pp.
McLaughlin, A. J., 1912. Sewage pollution of interstate and international
waters with special reference to the spread of typhoid fever. II. Lake
Superior and St. Marys River. III. Lake Michigan and the Straits
of Mackinac. IV. Lake Huron, St. Clair River, Lake St. Clair, and
the Detroit River. V. Lake Ontario and St. Lawrence River. U. S.
Treasury Dept., Hyg. Lab., Bull. (83):296 pp.
Michigan Water Resources Commission, 1954. Great Lakes water temperatures
at municipal sources along Michigan's shoreline. Mich. Water Res.
Comm.:50 pp.
Mohlman, F. W., and C. C. Ruchhoft, 1927. The quality of Lake Michigan
water, raw and treated, from Waukegan to Gary. Proc. Lake Mich.
Sanitation Congr., 3(2), (Apr.).
____, 1927. The quality of Lake Michigan water, raw an4 treated, from
Waukegan to Gary during 1926. Proc. Lake Mich. Sanitation Congr.,
3(4):31-47.
Palmer, A. W., 1903. Chemical survey of the waters of Illinois. Report
for the years of 1897-1902. Bull. (2), Univ. Ill.:254 pp.
Pearse, L., F. 0. Tonney, and E. Bartow, 1911. Report on sanitary survey
of Lake Michigan. Chicago to Waukegan. In:2d. Rept. Lake Mich. Water
Comm.: 39041.
Peterson, W. H., E. B. Fred, and B. P. Domogalla, 1925. The occurrence
of amino acids and other organic nitrogen compounds in lake water.
Jour. Biol. Chem., 63(2):287-295.
Stimpson, W., 1871. On the deep-water fauna of Lake Michigan. Am. Nat.
(1870-1871), 4(7) 403-405.
Thomas, B. W., and H. H. Chase, 1886. Diatomaceae of Lake Michigan as
collected during the last sixteen years from the water supply of the
city of Chicago. Chicago, 1886. Also:Notarisia, Commentarium
Phycologicum, Anno, 2(6):328-330, 1887. Venezia, Italia.
Thomas, N. A., 1940. Taste and odor control on Lake Michigan. Jour.
Am. Water Works Assoc., 32(7):1183-1186.




144


Townsend, C. McD,, 1913-14.  Effect upon the climate of the Lake States
by a change in the natural current of Lake Michigan. U. S. House
Representatives, 63rd. Congr., 2d. Sess., Doc. (762), App. C:40-71.
____, 1916. The currents of Lake Michigan and their influence on the
climate of the neighboring states. Jour. West. Soc. Engrs., 21:293-309.
Ward, He B,, 1896. A biological examination of Lake Michigan in the
Traverse Bay region. Bull. Micho Fish Comm. (6):1-71.
Ward, R, H., 1879. Purity of lake water. Amer. Naturalist.    pp. 534-535.
Whittlesey, C., 1851. On the superficial deposits of the northwestern
part of the United States.  Proc. Am. Assoc. Adv. Sci, 5:54-59.
Williamson, B. L., and J. Greenbank, 1939.  Investigation of the pollution
of the Fox and East rivers and of Green Bay in the vicinity of the
city of Green Bay, 1938-1939.  Wis. St. Comm. Water Pollution, St. Bd.
Health, and Green Bay Metropolitan Sewerage Comm.:242 pp.
Wright, S., 1931.  Bottom temperatures in deep lakes. Science, N. S.,
74(1921):413.
Lake Huron
Berry, Ao E., 1951. Survey of industrial wastes in the Lake Huron-Lake
Erie section of the international boundary waters. Pt. 1. Introduction
and Canadian section. Sewage and Indust. Wastes, 23(4)5508-517.
Black, Ho H., and L. F. Oeming, 1951. Survey of industrial wastes in the
Lake Huron-Lake Erie section of the international boundary water. Pt. 2.
United States sectionO  Sewage and Indust. Wastes, 23(4):517-535.
Cooper, W. Fo, 1905. Air and water temperatures. Rept. Mich, Acad. Sci.
(1905):1-9.
1 1905. The variation of land and water temperatures.   Rept. Mich.
Acad. Sci. (7):40-43.
Drummond, A. T., 1889. Temperatures in Lake Huron. Nature, 39:582. London.
Ellis, Jo B., and E. M. Sutherland, 1951. Report of the International
Joint Commission, U. S. and Canada, on the pollution of boundary waters.
312 pp.
Fry, F. E. J., and J. C. Budd, 1953. Preliminary reconnaissance of the
waters of Georgian Bay. Paper presented at Ann. Meeting Am. Soc. Limnol.
Oceanog., Madison, Wis., Sept. 7o
Fry, F. E  J., 1956. Movements of drift cards in Georgian Bay in 1953.
Jour. Fish. Res. Bd. Can., 13(1):1-5.
International Joint Commission, 1914.  Progress report —in re the pollution
of boundary waters —including report of the sanitary experts. Government


Printing Office, Jan, 16, 1914:388 pp. Wash.




145


__   1918. Pollution of boundary waters. Report of the consulting
sanitary engineer upon remedial measures. Government Printing
Office, Mar. 8, 1916:159 pp. Wash.
McLaughlin, A. J., 1912. Sewage pollution of interstate and international
waters with special reference to the spread of typhoid fever. II. Lake
Superior and St. Marys River. III. Lake Michigan and the Straits of
Mackinac. IV. Lake Huron, St. Clair River, Lake St. Clair, and the
Detroit River. V. Lake Ontario and St. Lawrence River. U. S.
Treasury Dept., Hyg. Lab., Bull. (83):296 pp.
Michigan Water Resources Commission, 1954. Great Lakes water temperatures
at municipal sources along Michigan's shoreline. Mich. Water Res.
Comm.:50 pp.
Odenbach, F. L., 1905. Some temperatures taken on Lake Huron and
Superior in July and August of 1904. Monthly Weather Rev., 33:154.
Wright, S., 1931. Bottom temperatures in deep lakes. Science, N. S.,
74(1921):413.
Lake Erie
Andrews, T. F., 1948. Temporary changes in certain limnological conditions in western Lake Erie produced by a windstorm. Ecol, 29(4):501-505.
Anonymous, 1929. Preliminary report on Lake Erie Cooperative Survey.
U. S. Fish. Serv. Bull. (173):2.
Berry, A. E., 1951. Survey of industrial wastes in the Lake HuronLake Erie section of the international boundary waters. Pt. 1.
Introduction and Canadian section. Sewage and Indust. Wastes, 23(4):
508-517.
Black, H. H., and L. F. Oeming, 1951. Survey of industrial wastes in
the Lake Huron-Lake Erie section of the international boundary waters.
Pt. 2. United States section. Sewage and Indust. Wastes, 23(4):517-535.
Blunt, W. T., 1897. Effect of gales on Lake Erie. Rept. U. S. Deep
Waterways Comm. (1896):155-168.
Britt, N. W., 1955. Stratification in western Lake Erie in summer of
1953: effects on the Hexagenia (Ephemeroptera) population. Eco.,
36(2): 239-244., 1955. Hexagenia (Ephemeroptera) population recovery in western
Lake Erie following the 1953 catastrophe. Ecol., 36(3):520-522.
Brown, E. H., Jr., 1953. Survey of the Bottom fauna of the mouths of
ten Lake Erie south shore rivers: its abundance, composition, and use
as index of stream pollution. Lake Erie pollution survey-final report.
Chapt. 5:156-170. Ohio Dept. Nat. Res.




146


Burgess, P., 1908. Report of examination of water purification plants.
In: Report of an investigation of water and sewage purification plants
in Ohio, 1906-1907, by Ohio St. Bd. Health:45-328.
Burkholder, Po R., 1929. Microplankton studies of Lake Erie. In: Preliminary report on the cooperative survey of Lake Erie —season of 1928.
Bull. Buffalo Soc. Nat. Sci., 14(3):73-93. Also in: A preliminary
report on the joint survey of Lake Erie. Suppl. 18th Ann. Rept. (1928),
N. Y. Cons. Dept.:60-66, 1929.
____, 1929. Biological significance of the chemical analyses. In: Preliminary report on the cooperative survey of Lake Erie —season of
1928. Bull. Buffalo Soc. Nat. Sci., 14(3):65-72.
____, 1930. A biological survey of Lake Erie. Science, N. S.,
71 (1837):288-289.
Carman, J. E., 1930. Drainage changes in the Toledo region. Ohio Jour.
Sci., 30:187-193.
Chandler, D. C., 1940. Limnological studies of western Lake Erie. I.
Plankton and certain physical-chemical data of the Bass Islands region,
from September, 1938, to November, 1939. Ohio Jour. Sci., 40(6):291-336.
___, 1942. Limnological studies of western Lake Erie. II. Light penetration and its relation to turbidity. Ecol, 23(1):41-52., 1942. Limnological studies of western Lake Erie. III. Phytoplankton and physical-chemical data from November, 1939, to November,
1940. Ohio Jour. Sci., 42(1):24-44., 1944. Limnological studies of western Lake Erie. IV. Relation
of limnological and climatic factors to the phytoplankton of 1941. Trans.
Am. Micr. Soc., 63(3):203-236., and 0. B. Weeks, 1945. Limnological studies of western Lake
Erie. V. Relation of limnological and meteorological conditions to
the production of phytoplankton in 1942. Ecol. Monog., 15:435-457.
Clark, F. N., 1884. Report of work at the United States hatchery,
Northville, Mich., 1881-82. Rept. U. S. Comm. Fish. (1881), Pt. 9:1037 -1062.
Crawford, L. C., 1953. Hydrology of Lake Erie and tributaries.   Lake
Erie pollution survey —final report, chapt. 2:19-28. Ohio Dept.
Nat. Res.
Curl, H. C., 1953. A study of distribution of phosphorus in western Lake
Erie and its utilization by natural phytoplankton populations. Lake
Erie pollution survey-final report. In chapt. 5:133-136. Ohio Dept.
Nat. Res.
Cutler, N. So, 1929. The biological investigations of pollution in the
Erie-Niagara watershed. In: A biological survey of the Erie-Niagara
system.  Suppl. 18th. Ann. Rept. (1928), N. Y. Cons. Dept.:134-139.




147


Davis, C. Co, and H. B, Roney, 1953. A preliminary study of industrial
pollution in the Cleveland Harbor area, Ohio.  Io Physical and
chemical results. Ohio Jour. Scio, 53(1):14-30.
Davis, C. C., 1953. Cleveland Harbor industrial pollution study. In:
Lake Erie pollution survey —final report, chapt. 5:170-188.  Ohio
Dept. Nat. Res.
_..., 1954. A preliminary study of the plankton of the Cleveland
Harbor area, Ohio.  II. The distribution and quantity of the
phytoplankton. Ecol. Monog., 24(4):321-347.
_____   1954. A preliminary study of the plankton of the Cleveland
Harbor area, Ohio. III. The zooplankton, and general ecological
considerations of phytoplankton and zooplankton production. Ohio Jour.
Sci., 54(6):388-408.
___, 1955. A preliminary study of industrial pollution in the
Cleveland Harbor area, Ohio.  IV. Plankton and industrial pollution
in Cleveland Harbor.  Jour. Sewage and Industo Wastes, 27(7):835-850.
Doan, K. He, 1942.  Some meteorological and limnological conditions as
factors in the abundance of certain fishes in Lake Erie. Abstracts
of Doctoral Dissertations (36), Ohio St. Univ.:47-49.
___._, 1942.  Some meteorological and limnological conditions as
factors in the abundance of certain fishes in Lake Erie, Ecol.
Monog., 12:293-314.
Donaldson, W., and R. W, Furman, 1927. Quantitative studies of phenols
in water supplyo Jour. Am, Water Works Assoc., 18(5):605-620.
Ellis, Jo B., and E. M. Sutherland, 1951. Report of the International
Joint Commission, U  S. and Canada, on the pollution of boundary
waters.: 312 pp.
Ellms, J. W., 1922. A sanitary survey of Lake Erie made opposite
Cleveland, Ohio, 1920. Jour. Am, Water Works Assoc., 9(2):186-207,
__   1924. Report of a sanitary survey of Lake Erie made opposite
the eastern section of Cleveland for the purpose of locating a new water
works intake.:22 pp. Photostat. Dept. Public Utilities, Cleveland, 0.
_____,  1940. Report on sanitary surveys of the water of Lake Erie
opposite the city of Cleveland and its suburbs made during the past
36 years.:16 pp. Unpubl. MS.
Ewers, L. A., 1930, The larval development of freshwater Copepoda. Ohio
St. Univ., Franz Theodore Stone Lab., Contr. (3):43 pp.
Fell, Go Eo, 1910. The currents at the easterly end of Lake Erie and
head of Niagara River: their influence on the sanitation of the city of
Buffalo, N. Y. Jour, Am, Med. Assoc,, 55(10):828-834.
Fish, C. J., 1929.  Preliminary report on the cooperative survey of Lake
Erie —season of 1928, Bull. Buffalo Soc, Nat. Sci., 14(3):1-15 (Intro

duction), 195-220 (Summary and conclusions),




148


_____, 1929. A preliminary report on the joint survey of Lake
Erie.  In: A biological survey of the Erie-Niagara system. Suppl. 18th.
Ann, Rept. (1928), N, Y. Cons. Dept.:39-44 (Introduction, 100-106
(Summary and conclusions).
Foulk, C. W., 1925. Industrial water supplies of Ohio. Geol. Surv.
Ohio, 4th. Ser., Bull, (29):406 pp.
Gacek, W. F., 1951o Mechanical analyses of sediments from southwest Lake
Erie. Master's thesis, Univ. Mich.
Gallagher, T. G., 1944. A sound approach to the problem of stream pollutiono  Ohio Cons. Bull., 8(1):19.
Gottschall, Ro Yo, 1930.  Preliminary report on the phytoplankton and
pollution in Presque Isle Bay, Lake Erie. Proc. Pa. Acad. Sci,, 4:1-11.
_____, and 0. E. Jennings, 1933. Limnological studies at Erie,
Pennsylvania.  Trans. Am, Micr. Soc., 52(3):181-191.
Henry, A. J,, 1902.  Wind velocity and fluctuations of water level on
Lake Erie,  UO S. Dept. Agric., Weather Bur., Bull. (262):22 pp.
Hildreth, S. Po, 1837. Miscellaneous observations made during a tour in
May 1835, to the Falls of Cuyahoga, near Lake Erie. Am. Jour. Sci.,
31:1-84.
Hutter, H. K., 1952. Eighty years of weather and climate at Toledo, Ohio.
Ohio Jour. Sci,, 52(2):62-75.
International Joint Commission, 1914. Progress report —in re the
pollution of boundary waters —including report of the sanitary experts.
Government Printing Office, Jan. 16, 1914:388 pp. Wash.
____, 1918. Pollution of boundary waters,   Report of the consulting
sanitary engineer upon remedial measures.  Government Printing Office,
Mar. 8, 1916:159 ppo Wash,
Jackson, D. Do, 1912. Report on the sanitary condition of the Cleveland
water supply, on the probable effect of the proposed changes in sewage
disposal, and on the various sources of typhoid fever in Cleveland. Div.
Water, Cleveland.:148 pp.
Jahoda, W. J., 1950. Seasonal differences in distribution of Diaptomus
(Copepoda) in western Lake Erie (Abstract). Doctorate Dissertation,
Ohio St. Univ,, 58:211-216o
Jennings, H. S,, 1898.  Trochosphaera again.  Science, N. S., 8(199):551.
_____..  19010  A report of work on the Protozoa of Lake Erie, with
especial reference to the laws of their movements. Bull. U. S. Bur.
Fish. (1899), 19:105-114.
Jennings, Oo Eo, 1930. A survey of the phytoplankton at Erie, Pennsylvania.
Science, N, S., 71(1848):560-561.




149


Johnson, J. W., 1948.  The characteristics of wind waves in lakes and
protected bays. Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 29(5):671-681.
Johnson, W. H., 1948. Limnological investigations of central Lake
Erie. Rept. to Univ. Western Ont,
Kadel, B. C., 1917. Anemometer records on Buffalo office building
compared with those secured near surface of Lake Erie. Monthly
Weather Rev., 45(4):156-159.
Kellicott, D. S., 1878. Notes on the microscopic life in the Buffalo
water supply. Am. Jour. Micr. and Popular Sci., 3(11):250-252.
Kindle, E. M., 1933. Erosion and sedimentation at Point Pelee.   42d.
Ann, Rept., Ont. Dept. Mines, Pt. 2:1-29.
Kinney, E. C,, 1953. Solar radiation at Put-in-Bay, Ohio. MS.
Stone Inst. Hydrobiol.
Kirtland, J. P., 1852. Peculiarities of the climate, flora, and fauna
of the south shore of Lake Erie, in the vicinity of Cleveland, Ohio.
Am. Jour. Sci., 2d. Ser., 13:215-219, 293-294.
Krecker, F. H., 1931. Vertical oscillations or seiches in lakes as a
factor in the aquatic environment. Ecol., 12(1):156-163.
__, and L. Y. Lancaster, 1933. Bottom shore fauna of western Lake
Erie:  A population study to a depth of six feet. Ecol., 14(2):79-93.
Lamar, W., 1953. Chemical and physical quality examination. Lake
Erie pollution survey-final report. Chapt. 4:81-123. Ohio Dept.
Nat. Res.
Landacre, F. L., 1908. The Protozoa of Sandusky Bay and vicinity.   Proc.
Ohio St. Acad. Sci., 4, Pt. 10:421-472.
Langlois, T. H., 1954. The western end of Lake Erie and its ecology,:479 pp.
J. W. Edwards, Publisher, Inc., Ann Arbor.
Lewis, S. J., 1906. Quality of water in the upper Ohio River basin and
at Erie, Pennsylvania. U. S. Geol. Surv., Water-supply Pap. (161):
114 pp.
McLaughlin, A. J., 1911. Sewage pollution of interstate and international waters, with special reference to the spread of typhoid fever.
I. Lake Erie and the Niagara River. U. S. Treasury Department, Hyg.
Lab., Bull (77), Pt. 1:169 pp.
McRae, H. C., and I. P. Kane, 1918. Engineering studies. Interception
and treatment of riparian sewage. Detroit and St. Clair River District
(1916). App. 1. Pollution of boundary waters. Internat. Joint
Com.: 23-65.
Metcalf, I. S. H., 1940. The influence of a shore community on the
distribution of certain fishes in Lake Erie, with especial reference
to the white bass. Doctoral dissertat.   Western Reserve Univ.




150


_    ___, 1942. The attraction of fishes by disposal plant effluent in a
fresh water lake. Ohio Jour. Sci., 42(5):191-197.
Meyer, B. S., and A. C. Heritage, 1941. Effect of turbidity and depth of
immersion on apparent photosynthesis in Ceratophyllum demersum. Ecol.,
22(1):17-22.
Michigan Water Resources Commission, 1954. Great Lakes water temperatures
at municipal sources along Michigan's shoreline. Mich. Water Res.
Comm.:50 pp.
Mills, H., 1882. Microscopic organisms in the Buffalo water supply and in
the Niagara River. Proc. Am. Soc. Micr., 5th Ann. Meeting:165-175.
Moseley, E. L., 1903. Rainfall and the level of Lake Erie. Nat. Geog.
Mag., 14:327-328.
Oberholtzer, G. R., 1911. The currents of Lake Erie; the possible
cause of the contamination of the water supply of the city of Erie by
sewage discharged into the harbor. Rept. to Chief U. S. Weather Bur.
(Feb.).
Ohio, State of, 1902. Sixteenth annual report, for the year ending
October 31, 1901. Ohio St. Bd. Health:495 pp.
Olson, F. C. W., 1952. The currents of western Lake Erie (Abstract).
Doctoral Dissertation, Ohio St. Univ., 62:419-424.
Osburn, R. C., 1926. A preliminary study of the extent and distribution
of sewage pollution in the west end of Lake Erie. Ohio Div. Fish and
Game:6 pp. Mimeographed., 1926. Details regarding preliminary pollution survey of Lake
Erie, Ohio Div. Fish and Game:14 pp. Mimeographed.
Parmenter, R., 1929. Hydrography. In: A biological survey of the
Erie-Niagara system. II. A preliminary report on-the joint survey of
Lake Erie. Suppl. 18th. Ann. Rept. (1928), N. Y. Cons. Dept.:45-55.
_  1929. Hydrography of Lake Erie. In: Preliminary report on the
cooperative survey of Lake Erie —season of 1928. Bull. Buffalo Soc.
Nat. Sci., 14(3):25-50.
Perkins, R. G., 1911. Typhoid fever in Cleveland in relation to
pollutions of Lake Erie. Cleveland Med. Jour., 10(2):81-104.
Pincus, H. J., 1953. The motion of sediment along the south shore of
Lake Erie. Proc. 4th Conf. on Coastal Eng., Chicago, 1953 Council on
Wave Research.
Remick, J. T., 1942. Effect of Lake Erie on the local distribution of
precipitation in winter.  Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 23:1-4, 111-117.
Shelford, V. E., and M. W. Boesel, 1942. Bottom animal communities of the
summer of 1937. Ohio Jour. Sci., 42(5):179-190.




151


Smith, H. M., 1898. Biological survey of Lake Erie. Science, N. S.,
8(183):13-14.
___  X 1900. Report on the inquiry respecting food-fishes and the
fishing-grounds. Rept. U. S. Comm. Fish. (1899), Pt. 25:CXIX-CXLVI., 1901. Report on the inquiry respecting food-fishes and the
fishing-grounds. Rept. U   S. Comm. Fish. (1900), Pt. 26:119-135.
Snow, J. W., 1903. The plankton algae of Lake Erie, with special
reference to the Chlorophyceae. Bull. U. S. Fish Comm. (1902),
22:369-394, 1904. Doc. (529) issued Aug. 4, 1903.
Stehle, M. E., 1923. Surface plankton Protozoa from Lake Erie in the
Put-in-Bay region. Ohio Jour. Sci., 23(1):41-54.
Streeter, H. W., 1953. Bacterial and sanitary analyses. Lake Erie
pollution survey —final report. Chapt. 3:29-80. Ohio Dept. Nat. Res.
Taft, C. E., 1942. Additions to the algae of the west end of Lake Erie.
Ohio Jour. Sci., 42(6):251-256.
__, 1945. The desmids of the west end of Lake Erie. Ohio Jour.
Sci,, 45(5)180-205.
Tidd, W. M., 1928. Zooplankton investigation in the west end of Lake
Erie for the spring, summer and fall of 1928. Ohio Div. Fish and
Game:3 pp. Mimeographed...., 1955. The zooplankton of western Lake Erie. In: Limnological
survey of western Lake Erie, by Stillman Wright. Spec. Sci. Rept.:
Fish. (139), U. S. Fish and Wildlife Serv.:200-249.
Tiffany, L. H., 1929. Algae of Lake Erie in relation to pollution.c2 pp.
Mimeographed., and E. H. Ahlstrom, 1931. New and interesting plankton algae
from Lake Erie. Ohio Jour. Sci,, 31(6):455-467.
Tiffany, L. H., 1934. The plankton algae of the west end of Lake Erie.
Ohio St. Univ., Franz Theodore Stone Lab., Contr. (6):112 pp.
__, 1937. The filamentous algae of the west end of Lake Erie. Am.
Midland Nat., 18(6):911-951..___.., 1955. The phytoplankton of western Lake Erie. In: Limnological
survey of western Lake Erie, by Stillman Wright. Spec. Sci. Rept.:Fish.
(139), U. S. Fish and Wildlife Serv.:139-200.
Turner, C. H., 1892. Notes on the Cladocera, Copepoda, Ostracoda,
Rotifera of Cincinnati, with descriptions of new species. Bull. Sci.
Lab. Denison Univ., 6(2):57-74.
U. S. Public Health Service, 1951. Lake Erie drainage basin. A cooperative
state-federal report on water pollution. Water Pollution Ser. (11),
U. S. P. H. Serv. Publ. (119):42 pp.




152


Van Gieson, P., 1942. Studies of bathing beach waters of Cleveland. Ann.
Rept., Ohio Conference on Sewage Treatment, 15:39-43.
Van Oosten, J., 1929. Some fisheries problems on the Great Lakes.
Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc., 59:63-85..___, 1948. Turbidity as a factor in the decline of Great Lakes fishes
with special reference to Lake Erie. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. (1945),
75:310-337.
Verber, J. L., 1953. Tentative summary of studies of water movements
in Lake Erie. Lake Erie pollution survey —final report. Chapt.
5:136. Ohio Dept. Nat. Res.
_____..   1953. Surface water movement in western Lake Erie. Ohio Jour.
Sci., 53(1):42-46.
____., 1955. Rotational water movements in western Lake Erie.   Proc.
Internat. Assoc. Theoret. Appl. Limnol., 12:97-104., 1955. The climates of South Bass Island, western Lake Erie.
Ecol., 36(3):388-400..___, 1955. Bibliography of physical limnology, 1781-1954.   Rept.
Invest. (25), Contr. (4) Lake Erie Geol. Res. Program, Ohio Dept.
Nat. Res.:57 pp.
Verduin, J., 1950. Data for converting light penetration to turbidity
in ppm. Franz Theodore Stone Inst. Hydrobiol., Put-in-Bay, Ohio. Unpubl.
___. 1951. A comparison of phytoplankton data obtained by a mobile
sampling method with those obtained from a single station. Am. Jour.
Bot., 38(1) 5-11.
_1951. Comparison of spring diatom crops of western Lake Erie
in 1949 and 1950. Ecol., 32(4):662-668.
___, 1952. Photosynthesis and growth rates of two diatom
communities in western Lake Erie.   Ecol., 33(2):163-168., 1953. The suspended silt in western Lake Erie during the
spring of 1951. Lake Erie pollution survey —final report. Chapt.
5:130-133. Ohio Dept. Nat. Res.,__    1954.  Phytoplankton and turbidity in western Lake Erie. Ecol.,
35(4):550-561.
____, 1956. Primary production in lakes.   Limnol. and Oceanog.,
1(2):85-91.
Vorce, C. M., 1881.  Forms observed in water of Lake Erie.   Proc. Am.
Soc. Micr., 4:50-60.
__, 1882. Microscopic forms observed in the waters of Lake Erie.
Proc. Am, Soc. Micr., 5: 187-196.




153


Wagner, F. E., 1929. Chemical investigation of the Erie-Niagara watershed.  In: A biological survey of the Erie-Niagara system. Suppl.
18th. Ann. Rept. (1928), N. Y. Cons. Dept.: 107-133.
Walton, L. B., 1915. A review of the described species of the order
Euglenoidina Bloch., class Flagellata (Protozoa), with particular
reference to those found in the city water supplies and in other
localities of Ohio. Ohio St. Univ. Bull., 19(5), Ohio Biol. Surv.
Bull., 1(4) 341-457.
Weeks, O. B., and D. C. Chandler, 1945. A visual comparator for the
estimation of turbidities of lake water of less than 25 ppm. Limn.
Soc. Am., Spec. Publ. (17):4 pp.
Whipple, G. C., 1905. Report on the quality of the water supply of the
city of Cleveland, Ohio. Div. Water Repts., Cleveland.
Whittlesey, C., 1851. On the superficial deposits of the northwestern
part of the United States. Proc. Am. Assoc. Adv. Sci., 5:54-59.
Williams, R. C., 1929. Pollution studies in the light of the chemical
analyses. In: Preliminary report on the cooperative survey of Lake
Erie —season of 1928.  Bull. Buffalo Soc. Nat. Sci., 14(3):60-64.., 1929. Chemical studies of Lake Erie.    In: A biological survey
of the Erie-Niagara system. II. A preliminary report on the joint
survey of Lake Erie. Suppl. 18th. Ann. Rept. (1928), N. Y. Cons.
Dept.: 58-60.
Wilson, C. B., 1929. The macroplankton of Lake Erie. In: Preliminary
report on the cooperative survey of Lake Erie —season of 1928. Bull.
Buffalo Soc. Nat. Sci., 14(3):94-135.
___.__, 1929. The macroplankton of Lake Erie. In: A biological survey
of the Erie-Niagara system. II. A preliminary report on the joint
survey of Lake Erie.  Suppl. 18th. Ann. Rept. (1928), N. Y. Cons.
Dept.:67-76.
Wood, H. A. H., 1951. Erosion on the shore of Lake Erie —Point aux Pins
to Long Point. Master's thesis. McMaster Univ.
Wood, K. G., 1953. Polarograms of oxygen in lake water. Science,
117:560-561.
_, 1953. Distribution and ecology of certain bottom living
invertebrates of the western basin of Lake Erie (Abstract). Doctorate
Dissertation, Ohio St. Univ., 72.
Wright, S., 1931. Bottom temperatures in deep lakes. Science, N. S.,
74(1921):413..., 1932. Pollution in western Lake Erie. The Fisherman, 1(6)-3-4,
10..___.  and W. M. Tidd, 1933. Summary of limnological investigations in
western Lake Erie in 1929 and 1930. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 63:271-285.




154


Wright, S., 1955. Limnological survey of western Lake Erie. Spec.
Sci. Rept.:Fish, (139), U, S. Fish and Wildlife Serv.:341 pp.
Young, M. Ko, 1928. Report on chemical investigations of the cooperative biological survey of 1927 and 1928. Ohio Div. Fish and Game:10 pp.
Mimeographed.
Youngquist, C. V., 1953. Lake Erie pollution survey —final report. Introduction.  Chapt. 1:13-18. Ohio Dept. Nat. Res........., 1953. Lake Erie pollution survey —supplement. Ohio Dept.
Nat. Res.:125 pp.
Zillig, A. M., 1929. Bacteriological studies of Lake Erie. In: Preliminary report on the cooperative survey of Lake Erie —season of
1928. Bull. Buffalo Soc. Nat. Sci,, 14(3):51-59.
_, 1929. Bacterial studies of Lake Erie. In: A biological survey
of the Erie-Niagara system. II. A preliminary report on the joint
survey of Lake Erie. Suppl. 18th. Ann. Rept. (1928), N. Y. Cons. Dept.:
56-58.
Lake Ontario
Adamstone, F. B., 1924. The distribution and economic importance of the
bottom fauna of Lake Nipigon with an appendix on the bottom fauna of
Lake Ontario. Univ. Toronto Studies, Biol, Ser., Publ. Ont. Fish. Res.
Lab. (24):33-100.
Clark, L. J,, 1892. Lake currents. Trans Roy. Can. Inst. (1890-1891,
2:154-157, 1892.
___   1893. Lake currents. Trans. Roy. Can. Inst. (1891-1892),
3:275-280, 1893.
Dewey, C,, 1838. Temperature of Lake Ontario. Am. Jour. Sci., 33:403-405.
___, 1839. On the temperature of Lake Ontario. Am. Jour. Sci.,
37:242-243.
1859. Varying level of Lake Ontario. Am. Jour. Sci,, 2d. Ser.,
27:398-399.
Drummond, A. T., 1889.  Some Lake Ontario temperatures. Nature, 40:416.
London.
Faigenbaum, H. M., 1932. Chemical investigation of the Oswegatchie and
Black river watersheds. In: A biological survey of the Oswegatchie and
Black river systems (Including also the lesser tributary streams of the
Upper St. Lawrence River and of northeastern Lake Ontario). Biol. Surv.
(1931), (6), Suppl. 21st. Ann, Rept. (1931), N. Y. Cons. Dept.:150-188.
Farrell, M. A., 1932.  Pollution studies. In: A biological survey of the
Oswegatchie and Black river systems (Including also the lesser tributary




155


streams of the Upper St. Lawrence River and of Northeastern Lake
Ontario). Biol. Surv. (1931), (6), Suppl. 21st. Ann. Rept. (1931),
N. Y. Cons. Dept.: 189-198.
Goodwin, W. L., 1892.  The water supply of the city of Kingston, Ontario.
Can. Rec. Sci., 5(2):117-127.
Kindle, E. M., 1915. Note on bottom currents in Lake Ontario. Am. Jour.
Sci,, 4th. Ser., 39:192-196.
_____     1915. Limestone solution on the bottom of Lake Ontario. Am.
Jour. Sci,, 4th, Ser., 39(234):651-656.
Langford, R. R., 1946. The study of seasonal and annual plankton
production in the eastern end of Lake Ontario. Proc. 9th. Meet.
Nation. Comm. Fish Cult., App. "D".
M'Anslan, W., 1888. On the temperature of Lake Ontario. Am. Jour. Sci.,
33:403.
McLaughlin, A. J., 1912. Sewage pollution of interstate and international
waters, with special reference to the spread of typhoid fever. II. Lake
Superior and St. Marys River. III. Lake Michigan and the Straits of
Mackinac. IV. Lake Huron, St. Clair River, Lake St. Clair, and the
Detroit River. V. Lake Ontario and St. Lawrence River. U. S.
Treasury Dept., Hyg. Lab., Bull, (83):296 pp.
Sibley, C. K., 1932. Fish food studies. In: A biological survey of the
Oswegatchie and Black river systems (Including also the lesser
tributary streams of the Upper St. Lawrence River and of northeastern
Lake Ontario). Biol. Surv. (1931), (6), Suppl. 21st. Ann. Rept. (1931),
N. Y. Cons. Dept.:120-132.
Tressler, W. L., T. S. Austin, and E. Orban, 1953. Seasonal variation of
some limnological factors in Irondequoit Bay, New York. Am, Midland
Nat., 49:878-903.
Tucker, A., 1948. The phytoplankton of the Bay of Quinte. Trans. Am.
Micr. Soc., 67(4):365-383.
Whipple, G. C., 1913. Effect of the sewage of Rochester, N. Y. on the
Genesee River and Lake Ontario under present conditions. In: Report
on the sewage disposal system of Rochester, New York, by Edwin A.
Fisher, App. 5:177-239.
All Great Lakes
Abbe, C., 1898. The rainfall and outflow of the Great Lakes. Monthly
Weather Rev., 26(4):164-166..___., 1898. Temperature of lake water. Monthly Weather Rev., 26(5):167.
Blackwell, T. E., 1869. On the hydrology of the basin of the River Saint
Lawrence. Trans. Am, Phil. Soc., 13, Pt. 3:249-304.




156


Brater, E. F., 1953. Hydrology and meteorology section. In: Rept.
Conf. Upper Great Lakes by Fred K. Sparrow:7-11.
Clarke, F. W., 1924. The composition of the river and lake waters of
the United States. Prof. Pap.(135), U. S. Geol. Surv.:199 pp.
Conger, N. B., 1899. Water temperature of the Great Lakes. Monthly
Weather Rev. (8):352.
___, 1908, Ice conditions on the Great Lakes, winter of 1907-08.
Monthly Weather Rev. and Ann. Summary, 36(1):137-140., 1908. Storms and ice on the Great Lakes. Monthly Weather Rev.,
36(8): 236-244.
___I__, 1909. Ice conditions on the Great Lakes, winter of 1908-09.
Monthly Weather Rev., 37(6):244-246.
Day, P. C., 1927. Precipitation in the drainage area of the Great Lakes,
1875-1924, with discussion of the levels of the separate lakes and
their relation to the annual precipitation. U. S. Weather Bur.,
Monthly Weather Rev. (1926), 54(3):85-106.
Dewey, D., 1846. Facts relating to the Great Lakes. Am. Jour. Sci.,
2d. Ser., 2:85-87. Also in: Edinb. New Phil. Jour., 17:295, 1847.
Dole, R. B., 1908. The waters of the Great Lakes. Paper presented
before Am. Public Health Assoc., Winnipeg, Manitoba, August, 1908.
_, 1909. The quality of surface waters in the United States.  Pt.
1. Analyses of waters east of the one hundredth meridian.   U. S. Geol.
Surv., Water-supply Pap. (236):123 pp.
Drummond, A. T., 1890. Some temperatures in the Great Lakes and St.
Lawrence. Can. Rec. Sci,, 4(2):77-85., 1892. Some lake and river temperatures. Can. Rec. Sci.,
5(1):13-19.
Eshleman, C. H,, 1921.  Do the Great Lakes diminish rainfall in the crop
growing season? U. S. Weather Bur., Monthly Weather Rev., 49(9):5000 -503.
Garriott, E. B., 1903. Storms of the Great Lakes. U. S. Dept. Agric.,
Weather Bur. (288), Bull. K.
Gaylord, W., 1938.  Influence of the Great Lakes on our autumnal
sunsets. Am. Jour. Sci., 33:335-341.
Hachey, H. B., 1952. Vertical temperature distribution in the Great
Lakes. Jour. Fish. Res. Bd. Can., 9(7):325-328.
Harrington, M. W., 1894. Currents of the Great Lakes as deduced from the
movements of bottle papers during the seasons of 1892 and 1893. U.
S. Dept. Agric., Weather Bur., Bull. B:6 pp.




157...., 1895.  Surface currents of the Great Lakes, as deduced from
the movements of bottle papers during the seasons of 1892, 1893, and
1894. U. S. Dept. Agric., Weather Bur., Bull. B. (rev. edit.):1-14.
Henry, A. J., 1899. Normal precipitation in the region of the Great
Lakes. Monthly Weather Rev., 27(4):151-153.., 1900. Lake levels and wind phenomena. Monthly Weather Rev.,
28(5) 203-205.
____, 1905. High water in the Great Lakes. Monthly Weather Rev.,
33(2):47-49.
___, and N. B. Conger, 1905. Meteorological chart of the Great
Lakes. U. S. Dept. Agric., Weather Bur., (333), (1):19 pp.
Hickman, H. C,, 1940. Evaporation experiments. Hydrology of the
Great Lakes —a symposium. Trans. Am. Soc. Civil Engrs., 105(2074):
807-818.
Higgins, 1930. Rept. U   S. Comm. Fish. for 1929, pp. 710-718.
Horton, R. E., and C. E. Grunsky, 1927. Hydrology of the Great Lakes.
Report of the Engineering Board of Review of the Sanitary District of
Chicago on the lake lowering controversy and a program of remedial
measures. Pt. 3, App. 2:432 pp.
Leighly, J. E., 1941. Effects of the Great Lakes on the annual march
of air temperatures in their vicinity. Pap. Mich. Acad. Sci. Arts.>
Lett., 27:377-414.
Lenhardt, L. G., 1955. Water quality and water usage of the Great Lakes
public water supplies. The Great Lakes and Michigan. Great Lakes
Res. Inst., Univ. Mich.:13-15.
Millar, F. G., 1952. Surface temperatures of the Great Lakes. Jour.
Fish. Res. Bd. Can., 9(7):329-376.
Nasmith, Go G,, and F. Adams, 1914. Wind driven currents in the Great
Lakes and their effect on municipal water supply. Jour. Preventive
Medicine and Sociology, 16(6):246-253.
Pettis, C. R., 1939. Hydrology of the Great Lakes. Trans. Am. Soc.
Civil Engrs, 104:584-596.
_, H. C. Hickman, et al, 1940. Hydrology of the Great Lakes —A
symposium. Trans. Am. Soc. Civil Engrs., 105(2074):794-849.
Poore, C., and L. E. Cooley, 1897.  The ice season —Basin of the Great
Lakes and surrounding territory, Rept. U. S. Deep Waterways Comm.
(1896), House Representatives, 54th. Congr., 2d. Sess., Doc.(192):193 -263.
Russell, I. C., 1895. Lakes of North America.:125 pp. Ginn and Co.
Schermerhorn, L. Y., 1887.  Physical characteristics of the northern and


northwestern lakes. Am. Jour. Sci.. 3d. Spr. 3(1 (9): 7,78-984




158


Smith, S. H., 1957, Limnological surveys of the Great Lakes —early
and recent. Trans. Am. Fish, Soc. (1956), 86:409-418.
Streeter, Ho W., 1930. Studies of the efficiency of water purification
processes. IV. Report on a collective survey of the efficiency of a
selected group of municipal water purification plants located along
the Great Lakes. U. S. Public Health Bull. (193):100 pp.
Visher, S. S,, 1943. Some climatic influences of the Great Lakes. Bull. Am.
Meteorol. Soc., 24:205-210.
Wisner, G. Y., 1898. The rainfall and outflow of the Great Lakes.
Monthly Weather Rev., 26(5):215-216.
Zacharias, Oo, 1894. Biologische Untersuchungen in amerikanischen
Seen. Biologisches Centralblatt, 14:605-6-7.
ADDITIONAL BIBLIOGRAPHY
Anonymous, 1956o A study of organic contaminants in boundary waters
using carbon filter techniques. Lake Huron-Lake Erie, 1953-1955. Prepared for the Inter. Joint Comm., Uo So and Canada, by U. S. Dept.
Health, Ed., and Welfare, Public Health Serv.; Robert A. Taft Sanitary
Engin. Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, and Ont. Dept. Health, Toronto, Ontario.
__, 1954. Public Water Supply Data, Bulletin No. 19, Bureau of
Environmental Sanitation, New York State Dept. of Health, Albany, N. Y.
Gillies, D. K. A., 1955o Meteorological factors affecting Lake Erie: A
progress report. Hydro-Electric Power Comm. Ont., Res. Div. Rpt., File
819.514, mimeographed.
Hunt, M. I. A., 1958. Evaporation of Lake Ontario. U. S. Lake Survey,
Corps of Engineers. Paper presented Amer. Soc. Civil Engrs., Chicago,
25 Feb.
Ingram, W. M., 1957, Rev. Handbook of Selected Biological References
on Water Pollution Control, Sewage Treatment, Water Treatment. U. S.
Dept. Health, Ed., and Welfare, Public Health Serv., Bur. State
Services, Water Supply and Water Pollution Control Program, Washington
25, D. C.
____, 1956. Handbook of Selected Biological References (Supplement)
on Water Pollution Control, Sewage Treatment, Water Treatment. Water
Pollution Control, Water Supply and Water Pollution Control Program,
Robert A. Taft Sanitary Eng. Center, U. S. Dept. Health, Ed., and
Welfare, Public Health Service,-Cincinnati, Ohio., mimeographed.
Ropes, G. E., 1954.  Precipitation over northeastern Lake Michigan (November
1952-October 1953).  U. S. Lake Survey, Corps of Engrs., U. S. Army,
630 Federal Bldg., Detroit, Mich., mimeographed.




159
Thomas, J. F. J., 1954. Industrial Water Resources of Canada, Water
Survey Report No. 3. Upper St. Lawrence River-Central Lakes
Drainage Basin in Canada. Canada Dept. Mines and Techn. Surveys,
Mines Branch, Indust. Miner. Div., Ottawa, Ont.
Thoman, J. R. Statistical Summary of Sewage Works in the United States.
Supplement 213, Public Health Reports, Federal Security Agency,
Public Health Service, Washington 25, D. C.




I