i; I i::;:::.-::.::: - S j::: r~ I'; i~:i;l;ir, aij iD rXir;i IS riit~:1~ j::::::-: _:::jlil`iiiw1::r:i,:i iimriir;iijj:,.i: :::: i::ilj:il:li-:::::::::: i -:::::r:~:j:;ii:iii:r::j:;:i:i. _:::j: i-;:::::!~,:'i:ji:;i:-i~~:jj-':;::"j:1:-::-:::::::::::-::: i'~:::::::::::: iil s;s:i: e Bi:j -o~~~:~ i:-:::::::::::::j:;~:i::~::i::-::: i::::: i —:-ta~i-i::li::il:::::iii::l:i:-:-::::::: as: it i: M4b:n,ti ""':?a~i;:-i'F uzr.:::i~iEB: qlii ~-~~~~~-~: il:-:ic"i"i" :::::j'-:::ZP,6~F;QY::::::i::::i:j~i:: _:_:;:, Ol tatoln't0 ntatr at0alpiamim. LIFE, EDUCATIONAL PRINCIPLES, AND METHODS, OF JOHN HENRY PESTALOZZI; WITH BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES OF SEVERAL OF HIS ASSISTANTS AND DISCIPLES. Reprinted from the American Journal of Education. EDITED BY HENRY BARNARD, LL.D., Chancellor of the UIniversity of Wisconsin. IN TWO PARTS. NEW YORK: PUBLISHED BY F. C. BROWNELNO. 12 APPLETON'S BUILDING, 1859. ENTERED, according to Act of Congress, in the year 1859, BY HENRY BARNARD, In the Clerk's Office of the District Court of Connecticut. SECOND EDITION. THE following Memoirs and Papers were originally prepared by the editor, or at his request, for " The American Journal of Education," as part of the History and Discussion of the great subject to which that periodical is devoted. They are collected in the present volume, as a Tribute to the Character and Services of one of the great Champions of Popular Enlightenment, and as a valuable contribution to the department of Educational Literature in the English language. I statqpi ant llatahi iai n PART I. MEMOIR OF PESTALOZZI, AND BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES OF SEVERAL OF HIS ASSISTANTS AND DISCIPLES. PART II. SELECTIONS FROM THE PUBLICATIONS OF PESTALOZZI. CONTENTS, PART 1. LIFE AND EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM OF PESTALOZZI. Portrait of Pestalozzi,............ 1 Preface,- 3 INTRODUCTION. Influence of Pestalozzi on the aims, principles, and methods of popular education, 11 Influence on Reformatory Education. By Dr. Blochmann, - - - - - 11 Influence on the Sch'ls and Educational Methods of Germany. By Dr. Diesterweg, 16 Summary of Pestalozzi's Principles of Education. By William C. Woodbridge, 29 Influence on the Infant School System of England,.32 LIFE OF PESTALOZZI. By Karl von Raumer,........ 37 Preface, -........ 41 I. Childhood and Youth, 1746-1767,....... 49 II. Agricultural and Educational Experiments at Neuhof, 1767,.... 56 III. The Evening Hour of a Hermit, 1780,.....59 IV. Leonard and Gertrude, 1781,.-......... 62 V. Life and Writings between 1781 and 1798,.65 VI. Experience at Stanz. 1798,........... 68 VII. " Burgdorf, 1799-1804,.......... 71 VIII. t( Buchsee, 1804,.87 IX. " Yverdun, 1805,........... 87 X. Last Years, 1815-1827,.115 XI. Relations to Christianity,......... 116 XII. Retrospect, 123 APPENDIX. By the American Editor,......... 127 Celebration of Pestalozzi's Centennial Birth-day in Germany and Switzerland, 129 List of Publications by Pestalozzi,......... 139 List of Publications in different languages on Pestalozzi and his Educational Principles and Methods,...... 142 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES of several of the assistants and disciples of Pestalozzi. - - 145 Preface,..... 149 i. Johannes Niederer,.......... 151 II. Hermann Kriisi,.....-. —.... 161 II. Johannes Buss,............. 193 IV. Joseph Schmid,......... - - - 202 V. John George Tobler......- 205 VI. John Ramsaner,......... 213 VII. John Ernst Plamann,........ 217 IX. Hans George Nigeli,............ 220 X. Johannes Harnisch,........... - 221 XI. Karl Augustus Zeller.......... 223 XII. Charles Christian Wilhelm von Tirk,......... 155 YIII. Bernhard Gottleb Denzel,......... - - 227 XIV. Friedrich Adolf Wilhelm Diesterweg,........ -229 Gustavus Frederick Dinter,.......... 232 PART II. SELECTIONS FROM THE PUBLICATIONS OF PESTALOZZI. Prefice,...........- I I. LEONARD AND GERTRUDE; or a Book for the People. As first published in German in 1781, 9 Notice of subsequent additions,. 135 Thile School in Bonnal, 137 II. CHRISTOPHER AND ALICE,......... 151 School and Home Education compared, 151 III. THE EVENIN HOUR OF A HERMIT. The Programme or Key to Pestalozzi's Educational Labors. First published in German in 1780, - - 154 IV. A CHRISTMAS Evz DISCOURSE. Delivered by Pestalozzi to his Family School on the 24th of December, 1810, 166 V. NEw YEARS ADDRESS, 1808, 175 VI. SEVENTY-SECOND BIRTHDAY ADDRESS. -.... - - - 178 VII. How GERTRUDE TEACHES HER CHILDREN,.... —. 171 Notice, 183 Pestalozzi, account of his educational experience,. 185 Methods of Elementary Instruction,- 189 Modifications of, by British Home and Colonial Infant and Juvenile Sch'l Society, 217 VIII. PATERNAL INSTRUCTIONS. A Bequet- of Father Pestalozzi to his Pupils. Edited by Krisi. Extracts,........ 228 PART I. MEMOIR OF PESTALOZZI. ssistants miat Sioripigs nf V^staln i. PESTALOZZI'S EDUCATIONAL LABORS FOR THE POOR, AND FOR POPULAR SCHOOLS. "IT is to the charitable efforts of Pestalozzi"-remarks M. Demetz, the founder of the most complete and successful institution of reformatory education in the world, in a report on the Agricultural Reformatory Colonies of France,-" that we owe the establishment of agricultural colonies," that is, of institutions, organized on the basis, and in the spirit of the family, with agricultural employment as the principal means of industrial training, and with methods of instruction, moral, intellectual, and physical, so far as applied, good enough for children of any class of society, and yet capable of being followed by an intelligent mother in the home of the poor. Not that Pestalozzi's own plans and methods under his own application, were eminently successful-for they were not. His institution at Neuhof, was a disastrous failure, in its immediate results, both as a school, and as a pecuniary speculation. But the christian spirit in which this excellent man labored-the family organization into which he gathered, even the outcasts of society, living among such pupils as a father, as well as pastor and teacher, and denying himself the quiet seclusion and comforts of the home which the fortune of his noble minded wife had secured for him, that he might inspire the orphan, and the abandoned and even criminal child with filial attachments, cultivate habits of self-reliance and profitable industry, and thus enable them " to live in the world like men"-this spirit, system and aim, the dream and labor of his long and troubled life, imperfectly inaugurated at Neuhof, and never fully realized at Stanz, Burgdorf, and Yverden, but widely diffused by his writings, and the better success, under more favorable conditions, of his pupils and disciples in Switzerland and Germany, have led to the establishment of new educational institutions for rich and poor, of schools of practical agriculture, as well as of agricultural reformatories, and at the same time has regenerated the methods of popular education generally. To the connected and comprehensive survey of Pestalozzi's Life and Educational System by von Raumer, we add a notice of his labors at Neuhof by Dr. Blochmann, of Dresden, and by Dr. Diesterweg, of Berlin, from discourses pronounced on the occasion of the Centennial celebration of Pestalozzi's birth-day on the 12th of January, 1846. PESTALOZZI S POOR SCHOOL AT NEUHOF. PESTALOZZI having failed in a plantation of madder which he had commenced in connection with a mercantile house of Zurich, on an estate of about one hundred acres of land on which he commenced a house in the 12 PESTALOZZI'S POOR SCHOOL AT NEUHOF. Italian villa style, to which he gave the name of Neuhof, projected the plan of an educational establishment respecting which Dr. Blochmann,* an admiring pupil and avowed follower thus writes: It was not in Pestalozzi's nature to sink under misfortune, so long as he could pursue the attainment of the object of his life. He had early learned and deeply fixed in his mind the maxim, " Tu ne cede malis, sed contra fortior ito." He advanced like a roused lion, with resolute courage, against all unfriendly influences. In spite of the severe distress into which the unforseen withdrawal of the Zurich house plunged him, he determined to go on, and to make his landed estate the centre of operations for his educational and agricultural plans. He resolved even upon more and higher designs. Henceforward he will live amongst beggar children, and share his bread in poverty amongst them; will live like a beggar himself, that he may learn to teach beggars to live like men. He also proposed to render his establishment an institution for the poor. This undertaking attracted attention. It was considered a noble and benevolent enterprise; and his views and principles had so much influence, in spite of the mistrust of his practical ability, that he found assistance in Zurich, Bern and Basle, and was able without much difficulty to obtain the necessary funds for the institution, by the aid of a loan, for several years, without interest. His friends on all sides assisted him; more especially Iselin of Basle, whom he had met and known in the Helvetic Diet, and who introduced the beloved enterprise to public notice in his Ephemerides. The Institution for the Poor at Neuhof was opened in 1775. Poor children flocked in from all directions, many of them gathered by Pestalozzi himself from their misery, and out of the streets. He had soon fifty children, whom he kept busy in summer with field labor, and in winter with spinning and other handicrafts, instructing them all the time, and developing and clearing up their mental faculties, especially by oral recitations and mental arithmetic.t Pestalozzi had early perceived * HENRY PESTALOZZI. Touches at a Picture of his Life and Labors: from his own testimony, from observation, and communication. By Dr. Karl Justus Blochmann, Privy School Councilor and Professor: Leipsic. 1846. t The idea of such a school for the poor, in which agricultural and industrial labor were to De combined with instruction, accompanied Pestalozzi, to whose mind it was so new and stimulating, all his life; and even remained like a sunbeam shining from behind the dark sad clouds of the past, his last love, his last active desire. What, however, he never completely accomplished, has been done by Emanuel von Fellenberg, who was assisted in the work, not only by his certain and practical skill and experience, but especially by his good fortune in discovering in Vehrli, such a man as is very seldom to be found, but absolutely necessary in the actual realization of such a school. Whoever, like myself-and there are thousands-has besome thoroughly acquainted with Vehrli's school in Hofwyl, must be convinced that in institutions for the education of the poor so organized, conducted in such a spirit, with such love and self-sacrifice, there is to be found an inestimable blessing for the state and the people. Fel-.enberg has shown from his account books, that a poor boy, received at his ninth year. and remaining in the institution through his eighteenth, pays by his labor during the last half of his stay, for the excess of the expense of maintaining him over his earnings, during the first half. Lange, in his work on "' The Country Educational Institutions for Poor Children," (Landliclu Erziehungs Anstalten fiur Armenkinder,) has made very thorough researches into this PESTALOZZI'S POOR SCHOOL AT NEUHOF. 13 that in the nature of every man are innate powers and means sufficient to assure him an adequate support; and that the hindrances arising from exterior circumstances, to the development of the natural endowments, are not in their nature insuperable. The usual means of benevolence and mercy (as he was accustomed to name the orphan houses, institutions for supporting the poor, &c., of the period,) seemed to him to stimulate and encourage the evil, instead of helping it. The thousand public and private ways of spending alms, with which the times were crowded to nauseation, the beggar making and hypocrite training modes of assisting the poor, seemed to him only a palliative. /The only means of affording real assistance he saw to lie in this; that (he inborn natural powers of every man to provide for his own necessities, and sufficiently to perform the business, duties and obligations of his being, should be developed, encouraged, and set upon an independent footing. /Vith this conviction the impulse increased within him to labor for this definite purpose;that it should become practicable for the poorest in the land to be assured of the development of their bodily, spiritual and moral powers both in relation to their own characters, and to their personal, domestic and social relations; and through this development to obtain the sure basis of a peaceful and sufficient means of existence. He had already taken the first step in this direction, by admitting into his house beggar children and others abandoned to neglect, that he might rescue them from their debasing condition, lead them back to manhood and a higher destiny, and thus prove to himself and those around him more and more clearly the truth of his opinion. His institution was to comprise the means for a sufficient iiitruction in field labor, in domestic work, and in associated industry. This was not, however, the ultimate purpose. That was, a training to manhood; and for it, these other departments were only preparatory. First of all, he proposed to train his poor children to exertion and selfcontrol, by forbearing and assiduous discipline, and by the ever powerful stimulus of love. He aimed to possess himself of their hearts, and from that starting point to bring them to the consciousness and the attainment of every thing noble and great in humanity. " I had from my youth " he says, "a high instinctive value of the influence of domestic training in the education of poor children, and likewise a decided preference for field labor, as the most comprehensive and unobjectionable external basis for this training, and also for another reason: as it is the condition of the manufacturing population which is increasing so rapidly amongst us, who, abandoned to the operations of a mercantile and speculating subject, not only from other writings upon institutions for the poor after the model of Fellen. berg's, but from his own repeated and extensive travels and personal observation. Our own teacher's association (pddagogische verein, at Dresden,) has proposed as a chief aim of its practical efforts, the realization of an institution for the education of poor and abandoned children, after Pestalozzi's model; for which purpose, it purchased some eight years since, a property in great part already in cultivation, and with a roomy mansion house, near the Lobtaner Schlage, which was dedicated on the 12th of January, 1845, by the name of the Pestalozzi Foundation, (Pestalozzi Stiftung.) 14 PESTALOZZI'S POOR SCHOOL AT NEUHOF. interest, wholly destitute of humanity, are in danger, in case of unforseen accident, of being able to find within themselves no means of escape from entire ruin.* Full of a love for my father-land, which hoped for it almost impossible things, and longed to lead it back to its native dignity and power, I sought with the greatest activity not only for the possible but for the certain means of averting the coming evil, and of awakening anew the remainder of the ancient home happiness, home industry, and home manners. These designs sank deep into my heart and often made me feel with sorrow what a high and indispensable human duty it is to labor for the poor and miserable, with all the means which our race possesses, in church, state or individuals, that he may attain to a consciousness of his own dignity through his feeling of the universal powers and endowments which he possesses, awakened within him; that he may not only learn to gabble over by rote the religious maxim that'man is created in the image of God, and is bound to live and die as the child of God,' but may himself experience its truth by virtue of the divine power within him, so that he may be irresistibly and really elevated not only above the ploughing oxen, but above the man in purple and silk, who lives unworthily of his high destiny." With such lofty and magnificent views, and with a heart at even a higher level of love, Pestalozzi labored at Neuhof from sunrise to sunset, amongst his beggar children. He lived steadily up to his principles, laboring in his vocation to the full extent of his powers; always knew what he was seeking, cared not for the morrow, but felt from moment to moment the needs of the present. Among his children were very many ungovernable ones of a better class, and still worse, many who had brought themselves from a better condition to beggary, and who were presumptuous and pretentious by reason of their former situation; to whom the energetic discipline which he applied, according to his design, was at first hateful. They considered their situation with him as more degrading than that in which they had been before. Neuhof was full every Sunday of the mothers and relatives of children who found their situation not what they had expected. All the impertinences which a miserable rabble of beggars could indulge in a house without visible protection or imposing exterior, were practiced, to encourage the children in their discontent; even so far that they were often tempted to run away by night just after they had been washed clean and clad in their Sunday clothes. However, these difficulties would little by little * Upon the influence of manufacturing wealth amongst the Swiss at that time, Pestalozzi expresses himself thus in another place: " The paternal love of the upper and the filial love of the lower classes, in consequence of the increase of the manufacturing interest, is going more and more to ruin under the effects of ignoble wealth. The blinding height of arrogance derived from an eminent position obtained by money, the deceitful cornucopia of an unreliable life of mere pleasure, has drawn all within its destructive influence, even down to the commonest of the people, and carried them into the crooked path of a spiritless and powerless routine life. Truth, honor, sympathy, moderation, are daily vanishing. Pride, insolence, recklessness. contemptuousness, laxity, immorality, the eager pursuit of vain and ostentatious pleasure, the cherishing of boundless selfishness, have taken the place of the ancient simplicity, faith and honor. PESTALOZZI'S POOR SCIOOL AT NEUHIOF. 15 have been overcome, had not Pestalozzi pushed his undertaking to anl extent altogether beyond his means, and undertaken to modify it according to the original design, which supposed the possession of the utmost knowledge of manufacturing and of human nature; qualities in which he was lacking in the same measure in which he needed them urgently for managing his institution. Moreover, he hurried on to the higher branches of instruction, before supplying the solid foundation of acquaintance with the lower; an error recognized as the leading one of the teaching of the age, against which he had striven in his scheme of education with all his strength. For the sake of a fallacious prospect of greater profit, in higher branches of industry, he committed, in teaching his children to spin and weave, the very faults which he had so strongly abjured in all his expressed opinions upon education, and which he saw to be so dangerous to children of all classes, He would attempt to secure the finest spinning, before his children had acquired even a small amount of firmness and surety of hand in coarse work; and undertook to manufacture muslin before his weavers had attained skill in weaving common cotton stuff. Through these and the like mistakes, through his ignorance of business, and his great lack of a sound practical faculty of learning it, it happened that Pestalozzi fell every year deeper in debts; and when these also from time to time had been paid by the self-sacrificing generosity of his noble wife, there came at last an end of this means of help, and in a few years the greater part of his substance and his expected inheritance was dissolved into smoke. The great confidence which he had enjoyed among his neighbors, changed when his undertaking failed so soon, into an utter and blind rejection of any shadow even of faith in his enterprise, or of belief in his possessing any capacity at all as a teacher. But such is the way of the world; it treated Pestalozzi, when poor, as it treats all who become poor by their own faults. Their money being gone, it withdraws also its confidence from them, in matters where they really are capable and efficient. His enterprise failed, in a manner excessively painful, both to himself and his wife, in the year 1780, in the fifth year of its existence. His misfortune was complete; he was now poor. He felt most deeply the condition of his noble hearted wife, who in the excess of her devotion had mortgaged away for him nearly all her possessions. His situation was indeed shocking. In his over handsome country house, he was often destitute of bread, wood, and a few pennies, wherewith to defend himself from cold and hunger. Only the entire forbearance of his creditors and the kind help of his friends preserved him from despair and entire ruin. Thus he lived a poor and destitute life in Neuhof for eighteen years, fighting with want and misery. He lived as a poor man amongst the poor; suffered what the common people suffered, and saw what they were. He studied the wants of the lower classes and the sources of their misery, in a manner which would have been impossible for one in better circumstances. PESTALOZZI AND THE SCHOOLS OF GERMANY. FROM THE GERMAN OF DR. DIESTERWEG. EVERY one considers it a matter of course that all our children go to school until they grow up to be youths and maidens. The observance of this custom begins at the sixth year. But the parents have long before spoken of the school to the child; he looks eagerly forward to the day of entrance; and when it takes place, he is absorbed in his school and his teacher for the next six or eight years or more. We always think of children and schools or children and books together. To be a child and to learn, have become almost synonymous terms. To find children in school, or passing along the streets with the apparatus which they use there, makes no one wonder. It is only the reverse, which attracts attention. The school fills a very important part in the life of the young. In fact school life is almost the whole life of childhood and youth; we can hardly conceive of them without it. Without school, without education, what would parents do with their children? Without them, where would they secure the young the necessary preparation for actual life? With our present organization of society, schools are indispensable institutions. Many others may perish in the course of time; many have already perished; but schools abide, and increase. Where they do not exist, we expect barbarity and ignorance; where they flourish, civilization and knowledge. No apology is necessary for sending our children to school. At school they learn. There they acquire mental activity and knowledge; the manifold varieties of things; to gain the knowledge of things in heaven above and in the earth beneath, and under the earth; of stones, and plants, and animals, and men; of past, present, and future. [The remainder of the discourse treats of three points:1. What were the schools before Pestalozzi? 2. What did they become by his means, and since; that is, what are they now? 8. What was Pestalozzi's life and labors?] I. THE OLD SCHOOLS. Our present system of common or public schools-that is schools which are open to all children under certain regulations-date from the discovery of printing in 1436, when books began to be furnished so cheaply that the poor could buy them. Especially after Martin Luther had translated the Bible into German, and the desire to possess and understand that invaluable book became universal, did there also become universal the desire to know how to read. Men sought to learn, not only for the sake of reading the Scriptures, but also to be able to read and PESTALOZZI AND THE POPULAR SCHOOL. 1 7 sing the psalms, and to learn the catechism. For this purpose schools for children were established, which were essentially reading schools. Reading was the first and principal study; next came singing, and then memorizing texts, songs, and the catechism. At first the ministers taught; but afterward the duty was turned over to the inferior church officers, the choristers and sextons. Their duties as choristers and sextons were paramount, and as schoolmasters only secondary. The children paid a small monthly fee; no more being thought necessary, since the schoolmaster derived a salary from the church. Nobody either made or knew how to make great pretensions to educational skill. If the teacher communicated to his scholars the acquirements above mentioned, and kept them in order, he gave satisfaction; and no one thought any thing about separate institutions for school children. There were no school books distinctively so called; the children learned their lessons in the Bible or the Psalter, and read either in the Old or the New Testament. Each child read by himself; the simultaneous method was not known. One after another stepped up to the table where the master sat. He pointed out one letter at a time, and named it; the child named it after him; he drilled him in recognizing and remembering each. Then they took letter by letter of the words, and by getting acquainted with them in this way, the child gradually learned to read. This was a difficult method for him; a very difficult one. Years usually passed before any facility had been acquired; many did not learn in four years. It was imitative and purely mechanical labor on both sides. To understand what was read was seldom thought of. The syllables were pronounced with equal force, and the reading was without grace or expression. Where it was possible, but unnaturally and mechanically, learning by heart was practiced. The children drawled out texts of Scripture, psalms, and the contents of the catechism fiom the beginning to end; short questions and long answers alike, all in the same monotonous manner. Anybody with delicate ears who heard the sound once, would remember it all his life long. There are people yet living, who were taught in that unintelligent way, who can corroborate these statements. Of the actual contents of the words whose sounds they had thus barely committed to memory by little and little, the children knew absolutely almost nothing. They learned superficially and understood superficially. Nothing really passed into their minds; at least nothing during their school years. The instruction in singing was no better. The master sang to them the psalm-tunes over and over, until they could sing them, or rather screech them, after him. Such was the condition of instruction in our schools during tle sixteenth, seventeenth, and two-thirds of the eighteenth centuries; confined to one or two studies, and those taught in the most imperfect and mechanical way. It was natural that youth endowed, when healthy, with an ever increas2 18 PESTALOZZI AND THE POPULAR SCHOOL. ing capacity for pleasure in living, should feel the utmost reluctance at attending school. To be employed daily, for three or four hours, or more, in this mechanical toil, was no light task; and it therefore became necessary to force the children to sit still, and study their lessons. During all that time, especially in the seventeenth century, during the fearful thirty years' war, and subsequently, as the age was sunk in barbarism, the children of course entered the schools ignorant and untrained. "As the old ones sung, so twittered the young." Stern severity and cruel punishments were the order of the day; and by them the children were kept in order. Parents governed children too young to attend, by threats of the schoolmaster and the school; and when they went, it was with fear and trembling. The rod, the cane, the raw-hide, were necessary apparatus in each school. The punishments of the teacher exceeded those of a prison. Kneeling on peas, sitting in the shame-bench, standing in the pillory, wearing an ass-cap, standing before the school door in the open street with a label on the back or breast, and other similar devices, were the remedies which the rude men of the age devised. To name a single example of a boy whom all have heard of, of high gifts, and of reputable family,-Dr. Martin Luther reckoned up fifteen or sixteen times that he was whipped upon the back in one forenoon. The learning and the training corresponds; the one was strictly a mechanical process; the other, only bodily punishment. What wonder that from such schools there came forth a rude generation; that men and women looked back all their lives to the school as to a dungeon, and to the teacher as a taskmaster, and jailer; that the schoolmaster was of a small repute; that understrappers were selected for school duty and school discipline; that dark, cold kennels were used for school-rooms; that the schoolmaster's place especially in the country, was assigned him amongst the servants and the like. This could not last; it has not, thank God! When and by what efforts of admirable men the change took place, I shall relate a little on. Let us now look at the present. II. THE MODERN SCHOOLS. What are our schools in this present fifth decade of the nineteenth century, and what are they from year to year growing to be? Upon this subject I can of course only give my readers a fresher and livelier impression of matters which they already understand. I begin with the exterior-not only every town, but every village of our father-land has at present its own school-houses. They are usually so noticeable for architecture, airiness and dimensions, as to be recognized at the first glance. The districts often compete amicably with each other in their appearance, and make great sacrifices for superiority. In the school-house resides the teacher; a man who is often an object of the ridicule of the young, but who, if really a teacher, deserves and possesses the respect of the old. Many of course fail to obtain an adequate reward, especially for their highest aspirations, in their important PESTALOZZI AND TIlE POPULAR SCHOOL. 19 calling; but their internal sources of satisfaction increase from day to day, in the power of lifting them above the depressing and wearing cares of their office. The conviction is daily gaining ground, that " what men do to the teacher, they are doing to their own children." The teacher is an educated man. He is trained in seminaries established and maintained for the purpose by the state. The time is past when teaching was practiced along with some handicraft; now undivided strength is devoted to it. How deeply teachers are themselves impressed with the importance, and engaged in the work, of steadily and continually improving themselves, is shown in the zeal with which they organize and maintain reading societies and associations for improvement. Let us now consider the interior condition of the school, and observe its instruction:The children are kept quiet far otherwise than by blows. Each sits in his own place, busy at his lessons. Nowhere in the light, roomy and cleanly school rooms or halls is there any interruption, or any thing that could interrupt the attention of the young students. The walls are adorned with all manner of apparatus. Far otherwise than by blows is the intercourse between teacher and children characterized. He greets them with a friendly word, and they him by rising up. He opens school with a prayer, and a hymn follows, sung well and sweetly. Now begins the business of instruction. All are earnest in it; every one has his work to do. There is no longer more than a slight trace of the plan of single instruction. All learn together every thing that is taught. Formerly the only thing taught to all was to read, and that by rote; for writing and arithmetic were required an extra payment; now, their work is regulated by a carefully considered plan of study, prepared by the teacher and superintending authorities of the school, which includes all subjects essential to the attainments of all; all the elements, that is of a general education. At the head of all instruction is that concerning God's providence and man's destiny; in religion and virtue. To instruct the children in these great truths, to lay the secure foundation of fixed religious habits, is the highest aim of the teacher. Maxims, songs, &c., chosen with wise foresight, are ineradicably planted in his memory,and become a rich treasure to the scholar in after life. The singing as a part of the religious exercises. In solo, duet, or chorus, the scholars sing to the edification of all who take pleasure in well doing. They also learn secular songs, suitable in words and melody, and promotive of social good feeling. The second chief subject of school instruction is reading. One who can not read easily, loses the principal means of acquiring knowledge during his future life. And how is it taught? The frightful old-fashioned drawl is done away with even to its last vestiges. Children now read, after two years' regular school attendance, not only fluently, but with just tone and accent, in such wise as to show that they understand and feel what they read. Is not that alone an immeasurable advance? Formerly, the children studied each by himself, and where they barely 20 PESTALOZZI AND TIlE POPULAR SCHOOL. learned to write by continual repetition of the letters and long practice, they now acquire facility in noting down and drawing up in the form of a composition, whatever they think or know. From the beginning, they are invariably trained to recite distinctly and correctly, speaking with proper tone, and as nearly as possible all together. This exercise has completely proved for the first time, how important it is that the teacher should understand and observe the rules of syntax and correct speaking. In this point, our present school instruction is an entirely new art, Thl old-fashioned teachers themselves could scarely read; now, the scholars learn it. It is needless to detail all that remains; the entire revolution in teaching arithmetic, where, for unintelligent rule-work, has been substituted the means of developing the intellect, inasmuch that the scholars can not only reckon easily both mentally and in writing, but cal also understand, judge, and form conclusions. It is needless to detail the instruction in the miscellaneous departments of geography, history, natural history, popular astronomy, physics, &c., which is intended for every man who pretends, even to the beginning of an education, and by means of which only is man enabled to comprehend the wonder of existence, and to grow up intelligently into an active life amongst its marvelous machinery. No; it is needless to speak of those things and of many more; but it would be wrong not to devote a few words to the means by which the teacher of the present day maintains discipline; that is, seeks to train his scholars to obedience, good order, good conduct and deportment, and to all other good qualities. In truth, no one who should overlook our immense improvement in this department can be said to know the proposed aim of our good schools and skillful educators and teachers; or ever to understand our schools at all. The well-disposed scholar is received and managed by love. But if the teacher finds himself forced to punish an ungoverned, disobedient, or lazy scholar, he at one puts a period to the indulgence of his base or wicked practices. It pains him, but his sense of duty prevails over his pain, and he punishes him as a man acquainted with human nature and as a friend, first admonishing him with words. Fear is not the sceptre with which he governs; that would train not men, but slaves. It is only when admonition, stimulation, and example have failed, and when duty absolutely demands it, that he makes use of harsher means. It is above all his endeavor to treat his children like a conscientious father. Their success is his pride and happiness; in it he finds the blessing of his difficult calling. He daily beseeches God for it, and looks with a thankful heart to him, the giver of all good, upon whose blessing every thing depends, and without whom the watchman of the house watches in vain, if under the divine protection any thing has prospered under his hands. Instead of a dark and dreary dungeon, the school has become an institution for training men. Where the children formerly only remained unwillingly, they now like best to go. Consider, now, what the consequences of this change of training must be on the hearts and lives of the PESTALOZZI AND THE POPULAR SCHOOL. 21 children. How many millions of tears less must flow every year down childrens' cheeks! In Germany alone, more than five millions of children are attending school at the same time. Is the inspiration of such a number to future goodness a fantastic vision? Must not every department of school management assume great importance? It is with joy and pride that I say it; I myself am a teacher. Nowhere, in general, do children spend happier hours, than in school; at morning, and at noon, they can not wait for the time of departing for school; they willingly lose their breakfast, rather than to be late. How was it formerly? How often did fathers or mothers drag their screaming children to the school? And what awaited them there? God bless the men who have been and still are laboring, to the end that the pleasant season of youth, which will never return, the happy time of innocent childhood, may not be troubled with the dark barbaric sterness of pedantic school-tyrants; but that the school may be a place where the children may learn all that is good and praiseworthy, in milder and more earnest ways; a place in which earnest and thoughtful men, friends of children, and loving the teacher's profession, may feel and admit that they have passed the happiest hours of their lives. From schools so conducted, a blessing must go forth over the earth. Indeed, the ancients knew this. Thousands of years ago, it was high praise to say "He has built us a school;" and not less to say, "He has prepared praise for himself in the mouths of children." The school has become an institution for training men and women; the old "school-masters " have become teachers. Pupils are now educated from the very foundations of their being, and by intelligible means. The scholar is not a machine, an automaton, a log; and accordingly the system of learning unintelligently by rote has come to be reckoned a slavish and degrading drudgery. The laws of human training and development are no longer arbitrarily announced, but are investigated, and when discovered, are faithfully followed. These laws lie within human nature itself. Beasts may be drilled at pleasure into external observances; but human beings must be educated and developed with reason and to reason, according to the laws impressed by God upon human nature. Of these laws, the schoolmaster handcraftsmen of former centuries knew nothing. Now, every thoughtful teacher adjusts his course of education and all his efforts whatever, as nearly as possible to nature. The consequences of this magnificent endeavor, in pedagogic science and art are plain before our eyes in our school-rooms. Instead of the former damp and gloomy prisons, we have light, healthy, clean and pleasant rooms; instead of dry and mechanical drilling in reading and other studies, effective and skillful education in the elements of all the knowledge and attainments required by man; instead of the ancient stick-government and bastinado system, a mild, earnest, paternal and reasonable method of discipline; loving instruction from well written books; teachers zealously discharging their duties; in short, we in Germany, by full consciousness that something better is always attainable, by laboring forward always to better methods, and by actual attainment, that the best educated nations on 22 PESTALOZZI AND TIlE POPULAR SCHOOL. earth, the French and English, are behind us in respect to educational matters, we may justifiably take pride in knowing that men from all thy civilized nations in the world, even from beyond the ocean, travel hither to observe the German common schools, to understand the German teachers, and to transplant into their own countries the benefits of which we are already possessed. The young reader who has followed me thus far will naturally inquire, how all this happened; in what manner this better school system came into being. And among the names of those noble men to whose thoughts and deeds we owe so invaluable a creation, all historians will record with high honor that of Pestalozzi. III. INFLUENCE OF PESTALOZZI'S LIFE AND LABORS ON THE SCHOOLS OF EUROPE. [We omit much of the details of Pestalozzi's career as they will be found in Raumer's Life already refered to.-Barnard's Journal of Education, VOL. III, p. 401.] As Pestalozzi grew up, he studied to become a minister, but finally decided to study law. In this profession he found no pleasure, although he completed his studies in it; his attention being involuntarily drawn aside to the unhappy condition of society around him. In the high places of his native city, prodigality, luxury, and contempt of the lower classes, were rife; while the poor in the other hand, regarded their superiors with hatred, but were prostrate in misery, want, ignorance, and immorality. The contemplation of these immeasurable evils of the age filled Pestalozz's heart with grief and pain, and these feelings directed his thoughts to a search for some remedy. The result of a year's reflection upon the means of assisting his unfortunate fellow-men was, that it could only be done by training; by a better education of youth, especially of the children of the poor and the lower classes generally. Like a flash the idea came into his mind, "I will be a schoolmaster;" a teacher and educator of poor children. He consulted within himself upon this changed design; and seem to hear a voice replying, "you shall;" and again, "you can." So he answered, "I will." How well he fulfilled the promise! He now became the schoolmaster'of a world. Intention, Power, and Resolve; wherever these three operate together, there result not only promising words, but efficient actors. He was filled with a sublime conception, which remained with him until after his eightieth year. His ideal was, the ennobling of mankind by education and culture. To this he devoted his whole life. He could pursue nothing else; he neglected every thing else; he thought of himself last of all. Ordinary men called him a fanatic, and cast nicknames at him and his enterprise. He continued his special affection and love for the children of the poor. He was.very early convinced that their education could not be successfully conducted within the close-shut, artificially organized public orphanhouses. He considered that they could only develop properly, in body PESTALOZZI AND THE POPULAR SCHOOL. 23 and mind alike, in the country; that they ought at an early age to commence at some country occupation; especially at some useful and practical kind of labor; and that by that means their minds would develop in a simple and natural manner. [Here follows a sketch of his labors at Neuhof.] Every child who was capable of it was set at some out door work, and suitable labor was also provided in the house; during which last time he instructed them. He was surprised to see how little use they made of their faculties; how blind and deaf they seemed to the most striking phenomena, and how incorrectly they spoke. Accordingly he concluded even then that the development of the faculties, learning to see and hear aright, and speak correctly, were worth more than facility in reading and writing. The enterprise was too large for means, and too complicated for his practical ability. [The experiment failed, but out of his painful experience and observation he wrote "Leonard and Gertrude," which was published by Decker of Berlin, in 1781.] Amongst the nobles, princes, citizens, and philanthropists, both of Germany and Switzerland, there had been since 1770 a growing desire for social improvements. The conviction was all the time spreading, that there was a necessity for bestowing a better education upon the lower classes; of opposing the spread of superstition, and of diffusing more light and knowledge. In educational directions, Basedow and the Canon von Rochow had already distinguished themselves; and thousands had enlisted in aiding their enterprises. A book like Leonard and Gertrude, full of nature and truth, must necessarily be received with enthusiasm. The author, hitherto unappreciated even in his own neighborhood, immediately came into repute and'honor. Encouraged by this success, he made in 1782 a tour through Germany, in search of model schools, studying the experience and operations of others, and gaining an acquaintance with the first men in Gemnany; Klopstock, Wieland, Goethe, Herder, Jacobi, &c. On his return he delighted the world with other useful writings. But still he did not succeed in finding any place where he could pursue undisturbed the object of his life. Meanwhile-for we must hasten-the French Revolution broke out, and proceeded onward to the most horrible excesses. Switzerland was attacked, and in 1798 was invaded and overrun. The usual consequences of war, impoverishment, demoralization and barbarism did not fail to follow. Such news made the patriotic heart of Pestalozzi beat higher. At the information that troops of destitute children were wandering helplessly about, particularly in the vicinity of the Catholic town of Stanz, he proceeded thither, obtained from the authorities the gift of an empty house, and gathered into it eighty mendicant children. He says in relation to this occurrence, " The unfortunate and ruined condition of Stanz, and the relations into which I came with a great crowd of entirely destitute, partly wild, but powerful children of nature and of the mountains, gave me an excellent basis of operations, and though in the midst of 24 PESTALOZZI AND THE POPULAR SCHOOL. manifold hindrances, an opportunity for a decisive experiment upon the scope and grade of the faculties which exist universally in children, as a base for education; and likewise to determine whether and'to what extent the requisites are possible and practicable, which the necessities of the case demands, for the education of the common people." He became their father, educator and teacher. Day and night he was with them, the earliest in the morning, and the last at night; he ate, slept and played with them. In a single month, they had learned as much of the profit and pleasure of his instructions, that often in the evening when he requested them to go to bed, they begged that he would stay a little longer and teach them. Content and happiness, the blessing of God, rested upon the house. When in 1799 the village of Altdorf was burnt, Pestalozzi asked his children, "How is it? Can we receive about twenty of these houseless children amongst us? If we do we must divide our food with them." "Yes, yes," they all cried out, shouting for joy. But this pleasure lasted not long. In that same year the French entered the neighborhood, took possession of the building for a hospital, and Father Pestalozzi was forced to disperse his children. His health was broken down with care, sorrow and over-exertion; and he was obliged once more to seek the means of support. He therefore went to Burgdorf, and established himself near the town as an assistant teacher without wages. His new modes of instruction displeased the country people. He did not let the children study the Heidelberg Catechism enough; and his instruction in thinking and speaking seemed to them entirely superfluous. But after eight months, the superintending authority, presenting themselves at the school, were much astonished at what he had accomplished. Unfortunately, his strength was exhausted in his oral labors; at the end of a year he had to resign his situation for the sake of his health. During all his experiments thus far, his purpose of founding a selfsupporting educational institution remained unaltered. He ceased operations at Burgdorf in 1801; was afterward established at Miinchen-Buchsee in Berne, near Hofwyl, where Fellenberg was laboring, and finally at Yverdun (Iferten,) where he entirely broke down in 1825. The last establishment was named the Pestalozzian Institute; and as such it became famous in all Europe, and even beyond the ocean, in America, &c. Neither before nor since has any similar institution ever attained to so great fame. The work done in that institution became the foundation of the common schools of Germany; and changed the ancient mechanical schools into institutions for real human training. The fundamental maxims upon which the instruction there proceeded, were as follows: The basis of education is not to be constructed, but to be sought; it exists in the nature of man. The nature of man contains an inborn and active instinct of development; is an organized nature; and man is an organized being. PESTALOZZI AND THE POPULAR SCHOOL. 25 True education will find that its chief hindrances are, passive obstructions in the way of development; its work is more negative than positive. Its positive work consists in stimulation; the science of education is a theory of stimulation, or the right application of the best motives. The development of man commences with natural perceptions through the senses; its highest attainment is, intellectually, the exercise of reason; practically, independence. The means of independence and self-maintenance is, spontaneous activity. Practical capacity depends much more upon the possession of intellectual and corporeal power, than upon the amount of knowledge. The chief aim of all education, (instruction included,) is therefore the development of these powers. The religious character depends much less upon learning the Scriptures and the catechism, than upon the intercourse of the child with a Godfearing mother and an energetic father. Religious education, like all other, must begin with the birth of the child; and it is principally in the hands of the mother. The chief departments for the development of power, are form, number and, speech. /The idea of elementary training is, the notion of laying, within the nature of the child, by means of domestic education, (the influence of father, mother, brothers and sisters,) the foundations of faith, love, of the powers of seeing, speaking and reflecting, and by the use of all the means of education, according to the laws and methods of development included within nature itself. Such is the actual substance of Pestalozzi's principles of education. The consequences follow of themselves. They are these: The family circle is the best place for education; the mother's book the best school-book. All instruction must be based upon training the intuitive faculty. The. first instruction is altogether instruction in seeing: the first instruction on any subject must be the same, in order to fruitful, active and real comprehension of it. The opposite of this is the empty and vain mode of mere verbal instruction. First the thing itself should be taught, and afterward, as far as possible, the form, the representation, and the name. The first portion of instruction consists in naming things and causing the names to be repeated, in describing them and causing them to be described. After this, it should be the teacher's prime object to develop spontaneous activity, and for that purpose to use the fore-mentioned pro gressive and inventive method of teaching. Nothing should be learnt by rote without being understood; the practice of learning by rote should be confined to mere matters of form. In the method of oral communication with the scholars is to be found an adequate measure for estimating the clearness and activity of the scholar's power of seeing, and his knowledge. The chief inducements to the right and the good are not fear and punishment, but kindness and love. 26 PESTALOZZI AND THE POPULAR SCHOOL These conclusions flow naturally from Pestalozzi's fundamental principles. If I were to give a brief statement of his method for inteliectual training, I should call it "Education to spontaneous activity, by means of knowledge acquired by the perceptions." This system has changed the whole condition of schools. It has not, it is true, yet penetrated all the schools, or all the teachers; but this is not the fault of the founder. To change a system established for centuries, is the work of centuries; not of a year, nor ten years. In the development of a nation, and in like manner of a school system, there are epochs, stationary periods, crises and reactions. While the best men in Prussia, after 1808, were laboring to effect a a regeneration of their unfortunate country, King Frederic William the Third* summoned C. A. Zeller the pupil of Pestalozzi, to K6nigsberg, with the commission of awakening the intellectual faculties of the people, as the only dependence for the rescue of the country. The great Fichte had already drawn attention to Pestalozzi, in his lectures and publications at Berlin. Afterward, the eminent minister, Von Altenstein, sent some young men to Yverdun to be trained.t By these means, and by means of the numerous publications of Pestalozzi and his followers, with some * Ramsauer writes as follows of the visit of Frederic William III. to Pestalozzi: "When the king of Prussia came to Neufchatel in ]814, Pestalozzi was very ill. Neverthe. less, he insisted that I should carry him to the king, that he might thank him for his zeal in the cause of common schools, and for having sent so many pupils to Yverdun. On the way he fainted several times, and I was obliged to take him from the vehicle and carry him into a house. I urged him to return, but he replied,'No; say nothing about it. I must see the king, if I die after it: if by means of my visit to him, a single Prussian child obtains a better education, I shall be well repaid.'" The benefits which this noble man wished for one child, have been secured already to millions. t Extract from a letter which the Baron Von Altenstein wrote to Pestalozzi, dated 11th Sept., 1808, at Kiinigsberg: "The king's majesty, with a view to the efficient improvement of the national system of education, which always lies so near his heart, has lately entrusted me, as directing minister, with the oversight of the schools and educational system in the proper Prussian provinces of his dominions. Being fully convinced of the great value of the system of instruction discovered, and so skillfully carried into practice by yourself, and expecting from it the most favorable influence upon the culture of the people, I am desirous of making its introduction into the elementary schools the basis of a thorough educational reform in those provinces. Among the measures which I contemplate for this purpose, one of the principal is, forthwith to send to you two suitable young men, that they may drink in the spirit of your entire system of education and instruction, at the purest source. I desire them not only to learn some one department of it but to master all of them, in their various connections and deepest unity, under the guidance of yourself, the eminent founder of the system, and with your efficient assistance. I desire them by this intercourse with you, not only to acquire the spirit of your system, but to become trained into a complete fitness for the teacher's vocation; to acquire the same conviction ofits holiness, and the same ardent impulses to pursue it, which have induced you to devote to it your whole life. In order to the best mode of procedure, I desire in the meanwhile to hear from yourself what class of young men you consider fittest to learn your method; what age, natural disposition, and previous mental training would suit you best, in order that the individuals selected may meet your wishes in every respect." In 1809, the minister of public instruction writes as follows to the teachers who had been sent to Yverdun: " The section of public instruction begs you to believe, and to assure Mr. Pestalozzi, that the cause is the interest of the government, and of his majesty. the. king, per. sonally, who are convinced that liberation fron extraordinary calamities is fruitless, and only to be effected by a thorough improvement of the people's education." PESTALOZZI AND THE POPULAR SCHOOL. 27 help from the pressure of circumstances, the Prussian, or rather the Prussian-Pestalozzian school-system, was established. For he is entitled to at least half the fame of the German common schools. Whatever of excellence or eminence they have, they really owe to no one but him. Wherever his principles have been deviated from, there has followed a decline. Whatever of progress yet remains visible is a development of his principles. Whatever in our system is based on human nature, is taken from him. His experiments have secured their world-wide fame to the German schools. From France, England, Italy, Spain, Russia, Poland, Norway, Sweden, Holland, Denmark, America, whoever desires to study the best schools, resorts to Germany. Whatever fame they have, they owe to Pestalozzi. Wise people have made use of his creations for organizing improved institutions for training teachers. But the first impulse was given to the movement by the noble Swiss. As the waters flow from that land in every direction, in like manner have fruitful principles of instruction been diffused from it into every country where improvement can be detected. The men and women by whom especially the method and spirit of Pestalozzi were diffused in Germany are; Frederick William III and his consort Louise;* state-councilors Nicolovius and Suvern; the philosopher Fichte, by his immortal addresses to the German nation; high schoolcouncilor Zeller in Kbnigsberg; the Prussian teachers trained at Yverdun; namely, Kawerau, Dreist, Henning, Braun, Steger Marsch, the two Bernhards, Hanel, Titze, Runge, Baltrusch, Patzig, Preuss, Kratz, and Rendschmidt; royal and school councilor Von Turk in Potsdam, seminary-director Gruner in Idstein; professor Ladomus in Carlsruhe; the prelate Denzel in Esslingen; seminary-director Stern in Carlsruhe; principal Plamann, in Berlin; seminary-director Harnisch in Breslau; Karoline Rudolphi in Heidelberg; Betty Gleim in Bremen and Elberfeld; Ramsauer, royal tutor in Oldenberg; professor Schacht in Mentz; seminary inspector Kruger in Bunzlau; seminary-director Hientzsch in Potsdam; principal Scholz in Breslau, Dr. Tillich in Dessau; director Blochmann in Dresden; principal Ackermann in Frankfort on the Mayne; principal de Laspe in Wiesbaden; seminary-inspector Wagner in Brihl; seminary-director Braun in Neuwied; seminary-preceptor Muhl in Trier; seminary-director Graffmann in Stettin; catechist Kroger in Hamburg; inspector Collmann in Cassel; and others. By means of these men the Pestalozzian common schools were set in operation throughout all Germany; and in Prussia, the Prussian-Pestalozzian system. As during Pestalozzi's life Yverdun was a place of pilgrimage for teachers, so afterward, from Europe, America and elsewhere, men came to observe the German and Prussian common schools. May this reputation never decrease; may it ever grow greater and greater! Much yet remains to be done. * Queen Louise, who superintended the education of her own children, visited frequently the schools conducted on the plans and methods of Pestalozzi, spending hours in each visit, and aided in many ways those who labored to regenerate the popular schools of Prussia. 28 PESTALOZZI'S PRINCIPLES OF EDUCATION. The foregoing sketch of Pestalozzi's labors, and of their influence on the popular schools of Germany, abridged from the Centennial Discourses of two of his avowed disciples, Dr. Blochlann, of Dresden, and Dr. Diesterweg, of Berlin, represent the extreme views entertained by the admirers of the great Swiss educator. There is a large number of educators and teachers, at the head of whom is Karl von Raumer, at one time a resident at Yverdun, for the purpose of studying the system and methods of the Pestalozzian Institution, who, while they acknowledge the value of Pestalozzi's services to the instruction and industrial training of the poor, and to the true theory of education, maintain that his principles and methods as developed and applied by himself, are in some lespects unsound and incomplete. The following summary and comparative view of tis principles, is taken from an article by William C. Woodbridge, in the American Annals of Education, for January, 1837. As the result of his investigations, Pestalozzi assumed as a fundamental principle, that education, in order to fit man for his destination, must proceed according to the laws of nature. To adopt the language of his followers-that it must not act as an arbitrary mediator between the child and nature, between man and God, pursuing its own artificial arrangements, instead of the indications of Providence-that it should assist the course of natural development, instead of doing it violence-that it should watch, and follow its progress, instead of attempting to mark out a path agreeably to a preconceived system. I. In view of this principle, he did not choose, like Basedow, to cultivate the mind in amaterial way, merely by inculcating and engrafting every thing relating to external objects, and giving mechanical skill. He sought, on the contrary, to develope, and exercise, and strengthen the faculties of the.child by a steady course of excitement to self-activity, with a limited degree of assistance to his efforts. II. In opposition to the haste, and blind groping of many teachers without system, he endeavored to find the proper point for commencing, and to proceed in a slow and gradual, but uninterrupted course, from one point to anotheralways waiting until the first should have a certain degree of distinctness in the mind of the child, before entering upon the exhibition of the second. To pursue any other course would only give superficial knowledge, which would neither afford pleasure to the child, nor promote its real progress. III. He opposed the undue cultivation of the memory and understanding, as hostile to true education. He placed the essence of education in the harmonious and uniform development of every faculty, so that the body should not be in advance of the mind, and that in the development of the mind, neither the physical powers, nor the affections, should be neglected; and that skill in action should be acquired at the same time with knowledge. When this point is secured, we may know that education has really begun, and that it is not merely superficial.. IV. He required close attention and constant reference to the peculiarities of every child, and of each sex, as well as to the characteristics of the people among whom he lived, in order that he might acquire the development and qualifications necessary for the situation to which the Creator destined him, when he gave him these active faculties, and be prepared to labor successfully for those among whom he was placed by his birth. V. While Basedow introduced a multitude of subjects of instruction into the schools, without special regard to the development of the intellectual powers, Pestalozzi considered this plan as superficial. He limited the elementary.subjects of instruction to Form, Number and Language, as the essential ec,dition PESTALOZZI'S PRINCIPLES OF EDUCATION. 29 of definite and distinct knowledge; and believed that these elements should be taught with the utmost possible simplicity, comprehensiveness and mutual connection. VI. Pestalozzi, as well as Basedow, desired that instruction should commence with the intuition or simple perception of external objects and their relations. He was not, however, satisfied with this alone, but wished that the art of observing should also be acquired. He thought the things perceived of less consequence than the cultivation of the perceptive powers, which should enable the child to observe completely,-to exhaust the subjects which should be brought before his mind. VII. While the Philanthropinists attached great importance to special exercises of reflection, Pestalozzi would not make this a subject of separate study. He maintained that every subject of instruction should be properly treated, and thus become an exercise of thought; and believed, that lessons on Number, and Proportion and Size, would give the best occasion for it. VIII. Pestalozzi, as well as Basedow, attached great importance to Arithmetic, particularly to Mental Arithmetic. He valued it, however, not merely in the limited yiew of its practical usefulness, but as an excellent means of strengthening the mind. He also introduced Geometry into the elementary schools, and the art connected with it, of modeling and drawing beautiful objects. He wished, in this way, to train the eye, the hand, and the touch, for that more advanced species of drawing which had not been thought of before. Proceeding from the simple and intuitive, to the more complicated and difficult forms, he arranged a series of exercises so gradual and complete, that the method of teaching this subject was soon brought to a good degree of perfection. IX. The Philanthropinists introduced the instruction of language into the common schools, but limited it chiefly to the writing of letters and preparation of essays. But Pestalozzi was not satisfied with a lifeless repetition of the rules of grammar, nor yet with mere exercises for common life. He aimed at a development of the laws of language from within-an introduction into its internal nature and construction and peculiar spirit-which would not only cultivate the intellect, but also improve the affections. It is impossible to do justice to his method of instruction on this subject, in a brief sketch like the presentbut those who have witnessed its progress and results, are fully aware of its practical character and value. X. Like Basedow, Rochow and others, Pestalozzi introduced vocal music into the circle of school studies, on account of its powerful influence on the heart. But he was not satisfied that the children should learn to sing a few melodies by note or by ear. He wished them to know the rules of melody and rhythm, and dynamics-to pursue a regular course of instruction, descending to its very elements, and rendering the musical notes as familiar as the sounds of the letters. The extensive work of Nageli and Pfeiffer has contributed very much to' give this branch of instruction a better form. Xl. He opposed the abuse which was made of the Socratic method in many of the Philanthropinic and other schools, by attempting to draw something out of children before they had received any knowledge. He recommends, on the contrary, in the early periods of instruction, the established method of dictation by the teacher and repetition by the scholar, with a proper regard to rhythm, and at a later period, especially in the mathematical and other subjects which involve reasoning, the modern method, in which the teacher merely gives out the problems in a proper order, and leaves them to be solhed by the pupils, by the exertion of their own powers. XII. Pestalozzi opposes strenuously the opinion that religious instruction should be addressed exclusively to the understanding; and shows that religion lies deep in the hearts of men, and that it should not be enstamped from without, but developed from within; that the basis of religious feeling is to be found in the childish disposition to love, to thankfulness. to veneration, obedience and confidence toward its parents; that these should be cultivated and strengthened and directed toward God; and that religion should be formally treated of at a later period in connection with the feelings thus excited. As he requires the mother to direct the first development of all the faculties of her child, he assigns to her especially the task of first cultivating the religious feelings. XIII. Pestalozzi agreed with Basedow, that mutual affection ought to reign between the educator and the pupil, both in the house and in the school, in or 30 PESTALOZZI'S PRINCIPLES OF EDUCATION. der to render education effectual and useful. He was, therefore, as little disposed as Basedow, to sustain school despotism; but he did not rely on artificial excitements, such as those addressed to emulation. He preferred that the children should find their best reward in the consciousness of increased intellectual vigor; and expected the teacher to render the instruction so attractive, that the delightful feeling of progress should be the strongest excitement to industry and to morality. XIV. Pestalozzi attached as much importance to the cultivation of the bodily powers, and the exercise of the senses, as the Philanthropinists, and in his publications, pointed out a graduated course for this purpose. But as Gutsmuths, Vieth, Jahn, and Clias treated this subject very fully, nothing further was written concerning it by his immediate followers. Such are the great principles which entitle Pestalozzi to the high praise of having given a more natural, a more comprehensive and deeper foundation for education and instruction, and of having called into being a method which is far superior to any that preceded it. But with all the excellencies of the system of education adopted by Pestalozzi, truth requires us to state that it also involves serious defects. 1. In his zeal for the improvement of the mind itself, and for those modes of instruction which were calculated to develop and invigorate its faculties, Pestalozzi forgot too much the necessity of general positive knowledge, as the material for thought and for practical use in future life. The pupils of his estahlishment, instructed on his plan, were too often dismissed with intellectual powers which were vigorous and acute, but without the stores of knowledge important for immediate use-well qualified for mathematical and abstract reasoning, but not prepared to apply it to the business of common life. 2. He commenced with intuitive, mathematical studies too early, attached too much importance to them, and devoted a portion of time to them, which did not allow a reasonable attention to other studies, and which prevented the regular and harmonious cultivation of other powers. 3. The method of instruction was also defective in one important point. Simplification was carried too far, and continued too long. The mind became so accustomed to receive knowledge divided into its most simple elements and smallest portions, that it was not prepared to embrace complicated ideas, or to make those rapid strides in investigation and conclusion which is one of the most important results of a sound education, and which indicates the most valuable kind of mental vigor both for scientific purposes and for practical life. 4. He attached too little importance to testimony as one of the sources of our knowledge, and devoted too little attention to historical truth. He was accustomed to observe that history was but a'tissue of lies;' and forgot that it was necessary to occupy the pupil with man, and with moral events, as well as with nature and matter, if' we wish to cultivate properly his moral powers, and elevate him above the material worll. 5. But above all, it is to be regretted, that in reference to religious education, he fell into an important error of his predecessors. His too exclusive attention to mathematical and scientific subjects, tended, like the system of Basedow, to give his pupils the habit of undervaluing historical evidence and of demanding rational demonstration for every truth, or of requiring-the evidence of their senses, or something analogous to it, to which they were constantly called to appeal in their studies of Natural History. It is precisely in this way, that many men of profound scientific attainments have been led to reject the evidence of' revelation, and some, even, strange as it may seem, to deny the existence of Him, whose works and laws they study. In some of the early Pestalozzian schools, feelings of this nature were particularly cherished by the habit of asserting a falsehood in the lessons on Mathematics or Natural history, and calling upon the pupils to contradict it or disprove it if they did not admit its truth. No improvement of the intellectual powers, can, in our view, compensate for the injury to the moral sense and the diminished respect for truth, which will naturally result from such a course. 6. While Pestalozzi disapproved of the attempts of the Philanthropinists to draw forth from the minds of children, before they had stores of knowledge, he seemed to forget the application of his principle to moral subjects, or to imagine that this most elevated species of knowledge was innate. He attempted too much to draw from the minds of his pupils those great truths of religion and the PESTALOZZI'S PRINCIPLES OF EDUCATION. 31 spiritual world which can only be acquired from revelation; and thus led them to imagine they were competent to judge on this subject without external aid. It is obvious that such a course would fall in most unhappily with the tendencies produced by other parts of the plan, and that we could not hope to educate in such a mode, a truly Christian community. The personal character of Pestalozzi also influenced his views and methods of education on religious subjects. He was remarkably the creature of powerful impulses, which were usually of the most mild and benevolent kind; and he preserved a child-like character in this respect even to old age. It was probably this temperament, which led him to estimate at a low rate the importance of positive religious truth in the education of children, and to maintain that the mere habit of faith and love, if cultivated toward earthly friends and benefactors, would, of course, be transferred to our Heavenly Father, whenever his character should be exhibited to the mind of the child. The fundamental error of this view was established by the unhappy experience of his own institution. His own example afforded the most striking evidence that the noblest impulses, not directed by established principles, may lead to imprudence and ruin, and thus defeat their own ends. As an illustration of this, it may be mentioned that, on one of those occasions, frequently occurring, on which he was reduced to extremity for want of the means of supplying his large family, he borrowed four hundred dollars from a friend for the purpose. In going home, he met a peasant, wringing his hands in despair for the loss of his cow. Pestalozzi put the entire bag of money into his hands, and ran off to escape his thanks. These circumstances, combined with the want of tact in reference to the affairs of common life, materially impaired his powers of usefulness as a practical instructor of youth. The rapid progress of his ideas rarely allowed him to execute his own plans; and, in accordance with his own system, too much time was employed in the profound development of principles, to admit of much attention to their practical application. But, as one of his admirers observed, it was his province to educate ideas and not children. He combated, with unshrinking boldness and untiring perseverance, through a long life, the prejudices and abuses of the age in reference to education, both by his example and by his numerous publications. He attacked with great vigor and no small degree of success, that favorite maxim of bigotry and tyranny, that obedience and devotion are the legitimate offspring of ignorance. He denounced that degrading system, which considers it enough to enable man to procure a subsistence for himself and his offspring-and in this manner, merely to place him on a level with the beast of the forest; and which deems every thing lost whose value can not be estimated in money. He urged upon the consciences of parents and rulers, with an energy approaching that of the ancient prophets, the solemn duties which Divine Providence had imposed upon them, in committing to their charge the present and future destinies of their fellow-beings. In this way, he produced an impulse, which pervaded the continent of Europe, and which, by means of his popular and theoretical works, reached the cottages of the poor and the palaces of the great. His institution at Yverdun was crowded with men of every nation; not merely those who were led by the same impulse which inspired him, but by the agents of kings and noblemen, and public institutions, who came to make themselves acquainted with his principles, in order to become his fellow-laborers in other countries." INFLUENCE OF PESTALOZZI ON THE INFANT SCHOOL SYSTEM OF ENGLAND. THROUGH the efforts of Dr. Mayo, Dr. Biber, and Mr. Greaves, (each of whom spent several months at Yverdun, and subsequently made publications on the subject,) and especially through the labors of the Infant School Society, a knowledge of Pestalozzi's educational principles and methods has been gradually infused into the popular schools of England. The following syllabus of "Lessons on Education," will show the extent to which Pestalozzi is now recognized as authority in the best infant schools of Great Britain. EXTRACTS FROM SYLLABUS OF LESSONS ON EDUCATION, GIVEN TO STUDENTS IN TRAINING AT THE HOME AND COLONIAL SCHOOL SOCIETY. I.-THE PRINCIPLES OF EDUCATION AS SET FORTH BY PESTALOZZI. 1. On the Aim proposed by Pestalozzi in Education.-This the first point to be considered-Mistakes with respect to-The true aim of education as it respects knowledge -intellectual and moral character-Social relations-Moral and religious dutiesPrinciples on which based-The proper work of the Teacher reduced-Results. 2. The Influence of a good Education.-The little that has been done by education as hitherto pursued-Causes of this-Influence of a good education on thought, feeling, sentiment, opinion, &c.-Different senses in which the child may be said to be father of the man-Influence of education established from examples-Necessity of faith in this principle on the part of the Teacher-Incidental and systematic education, difference between-The Teacher to form a good intellectual and moral atmosphere round the child-Means of effecting this. 3. Education, Organic.-Organs and organized bodies considered to illustrate thisDifference between growth from within carried on by organic action or development, and increase from without effected by accretion-Application-Difference between ordinary elementary education and elementary education on the system of Pestalozzi -Deductions as to liberty, activity, and power-The application, especially as to liberty, in the school-room and play-ground. 4. On Education being an entire Work.-Pestalozzi's motto, " Education has to work on the head, the hand, and the heart "-Dugald Stewart on the same point-Pestalozzi introduced the principle into popular education-The perfection to be aimed at in education, moral,-Mistakes that have been made as to Pestalozzi's practice-Pestalozzi's estimate of the relative importance of the different elements of a child's nature, and method of dealing with each. 5. Education should aim at the Gradual and Progressive Development of the Faculties.Examples of graduated and progressive instruction as-Proceeding from realities to signs, first naturals then artificial-From particular facts to general truths-From what is simple to what is complex-From the exercise of observation to the exercise of conception-From the conception of material things to abstract ideas, &c.-The first step -to find something analogous in the experience of the child to the subject presented, thus proceeding from the known to the unknown-The child to be firm on one step before proceeding to the next-The extent to which graduation should be carried-Extremes to be avoided-The graduations not to be too minute to prevent healthy exercise. * 6. Education should be Harmonious.-The cultivation of all the faculties, not singly and apart, but simultaneously. 7. The Character or Spirit of Education.-" Not to teach religion alone but all things religiously "-Illustration drawn from the circulation of the blood in the body-Exemplification of this spirit in the instruction, general management, and discipline of the school-Results to be expected. 8. Early Education chiefly by Intuition.-What is meant by intuition-ExamplesValue of what is learned from experience-Early education to lead to and prepare the mind for books-When commenced with books the mind often loaded with words conveying no definite meaning to children-The powers of the mind in consequence often cramped-Intuitive teaching one of the leading features of Pestalozzi's system-Connection between intuitive and logical knowledge-The assistance the former gives to SCHOOL MANAGEMENT AND THE ART OF TEACHING. 33 the latter-Difference between the instruction of infants and juveniles, the one mainly intuitive, the other principally logical. 9. Difference between Education and Instruction.-An idea put forth strongly by Pestalozzi-Origin and application of the words-Points of difference-Instruction communicated (though the subject may be clearly explained) does not produce the same good effect, as instruction employed as a means of mental discipline-The proper bearing of this distinction on the lessons of the Teacher. 10. Education of a Mixed Character.-What this means-Principle on which basedExamples-Education should be practical as well as preceptive-Illustrated by the Teacher as well as enforced upon the child-Applied individually as well as collectively-Direct instruction to be followed by study-Public education united with private and domestic-Children to be carried rapidly over some subjects to develop power and energy,-slowly over others to give habits of minute investigation-Subjects of instruction enumerated. 11. Systems of Education.-Application of the word system-Views generally taken of systems of education-Characteristics of the chief popular systems, especially those of Stow and Pestalozzi-The one teaching chiefly through words "picturing out," as it is called, the other by things and words in their appropriate place-The specious boast of selecting what is good from every system-The motto, " That is the best system which brings the powers of the mind under the best discipline," a test-The system of Pestalozzi founded on principles and adapted to the human mind, conse. quently a philosophical system, might be called the natural system-Different value of principles and plans-Illustration of this shown in the different kinds of value appertaining to wheat and bread-Advantage of principles in every thing-Many Teachers appreciate plans only-Principles the only true and safe guide. 12. Summary of the leading Principles of Pestalozzi. 1. Education ought to he essentially religious and moral. 2. Education ought to be essentially organic and complete, and not mechanical, superficial, and partial, it should penetrate and regulate the entire being. 3. Education ought to be free and natural instead of being cramped, confined, survile-The child should have sufficient liberty to manifest decidedly his individual character. 4. Education ought to he harmonious in all its parts-It should be so carried on that all the natural faculties, and all the acquired knowledge agree and harmonize. 5. Education should be based on intuition, on a clear and distinct perception of the subject to be learned. 6. Education should be gradual and progressive, united in all parts, like a chain, forming a continued series without gaps. 7. Education should be of a mixed character, uniting the private and the public; it should cultivate at the same time the social and domestic spirit. 8. Education should be synthetical-every thing taught should be first reduced into its elements by the Teacher. 9. Education should be practical, drawing its means of development from the actual circumstances of life. II.-THE ART OF TEACHING. 1.-INTRODUCTORY COURSE. 1. Instructions as to the Mode of giving Familiar or Conversational Lessons, and on the subjects chosen for such lessons in the Practicing Schools of the Institution. 2. The Examination and Analysis of Lessons selected from " Model Lessons," a work published by the Society. 3. Drawing out Sketches of Lessons on various Subjects, taking those before analyzed as examples. 4. Different Methods of giving Lessons Compared, with a view to point out which are bad and which good, also the methods suitable to different subjects. 5. On the Art of Questioning.-The importance of understanding this art-One of the plans of teaching much used by Pestalozzi-Different objects in view in questioningQuestions which only exercise memory-Advantages of questioning-Rules to be ob served and mistakes avoided-Examples of different kinds of questions-Of a train of questions-Practice in the art of questioning. 2.-ON GALLERY INSTRUCTION. 1. Introduction.-The nature and importance of gallery instruction-Children brought under the direct influence of the Teacher-Facility thus afforded for securing order, attention, progress, moral training- Value in economizing labor-The principle of success to be found in the power of the sympathy of numbers-Extent to which Teachers should avail themselves of this sympathy-Its abuses-Duties connected with gallery instruction. 2. Preparation of Lessons.-Directions for making a good sketch-Advantages of a 3 34 SCHOOL MANAGEMENT AND THE ART OF TEACHING. fiull sketch-Importance of determining beforehand the chief points of the lesson, and the method of working them out. 3. The Subject matter.-Importance of attention to quantity and quality-Rules by which to he guided, and the principles upon which based-Advantage of clear and natural arrangement-The ideas to be thoroughly worked into the minds of the childrensufficient'but not too much new matter to be presented properly, it being almost "as important how children learn as what they learn." 4. The Summnary.-Definition of a summary-The qualities of a good summary-Its uses-Various ways of making a summary-Advantage of its being well committed to memory or written out by the children. 5. Application of Moral ind Religious Lessons.-The nature of this application explained-The importance of applying moral and religious instruction-Of requiring the children to make the application themselves-What is meant by impression-Causes of failure in making religious instruction impressive. 6. Order, Interest, and Attention.-The importance of order-Causes of disorderVarious means of obtaining and regaining order-Difference between order and stiffness or restraint-Importance of exciting interest-Means of doing it-Difference be tween healthful activity of mind and excitement-Attention how to be obtained and kept up. 7. The Exercise to be given to the Minds of Children.-Importance of producing activity of the mind-Amount of mental exercise to be given-Means of giving it-Teachers tell too much-Ways of doing so, and causes. 8. The Manner of the Teacher.-Importance of manner, especially with young children-Different kinds of manner-How each affects children-The power of a decided manner-Its abuse-The effects of the voice in exciting different feelings-Tones of voice suited to different subjects. 9. Attention to the whole Gallery.-Temptations to attend to a few children onlyEffects-Means of keeping up general attention-Difficulties where a gallery is unhappily composed of children of different degrees of attainment-How in part to be obviated. 10. The Use to be made of Incidental Circumstances, especially in Moral Training.Enumeration of those which most commonly occur in a gallery, and also in the playground-The influence that the notice of incidental circumstances has on the children, as well in an intellectual as in a moral point of view-Cautions against the abuse of this practice. 11. On the Language given to Children.-Relation of language to ideas-Right time of supplying language —Necessity for clearness and simplicity-Fine words and technical terms to be avoided. 3.-ON CLASS INSTRUCTION. Use of class lessons-Mechanical arrangements-Apparatus-Amount of class instruction to be given-Subjects. 4.-ON THE SUBJECTS OF INSTRUCTION, ETC., PROPER FOR AN INFANT SCHOOL. 1. On the Principles that should Regulate.-The choice of subjects should be suitable to the children's age-Elementary character of the subjects-Necessity of having a general design in each course of lessons, as well as a particular design in each lessonThe importance of the instruction being of a graduated character-Of its corpmencing at the right starting point-Subjects should be varied-The reason and principles upon which this is founded. 2' The subject stated.-Color-Object in view in lessons on color, and their suitableness to this object and to infant minds-The graduated course of these lessons, with reference to the work published by the Society, entitled, " Graduated course of Instruction for Infant Schools and Nurseries"-Methods to be adopted in giving lessons-Principles to be deduced. q. The other subjects treated in a similar manner-Form-Size-Weight-PlaceNumber-Physical actions and employments-Sounds, including practice in singingCommon objects-Pictures of common objects-Drawing before children-Human body-Animals-Plants-Language-Reading, Spelling, Writing-Pieces of poetryMoral instruction-Religious instruction. 5.-ON THE SUBJECTS OF INSTRUCTION, ETC., PROPER FOR A JUVENILE SCHOOL. 1. Points in which a Juvenile School differs from an Infant School.-As to its organization-Division of time-Classification of children-Home-work-Employment of PupilTeachers-Subjects of instruction calling the reasoning powers more into exerciseMethod of giving such subjects a more continuous and systematic character-Mode of treating the children-Morally, throwing them more upon their own responsibiiityIntellectually, making them more independent of their Teachers, and more accustomed to gain information and knowledge from books, teaching them early " to learn how to learn," i. e., to be self-educators. SCHOOL MANAGEMENT AND THE ART OF TEACHING. 35 III.-THE SCHOOL-ROOM, AS TO ITS ARRANGEMENT AND MANAGEMENT. 1. The School-room.-Influence of the appearance of the school-room on the children's character-Its effect on visitors-Desks and their arrangement-Cleaning-Ven tilation-Temperature-Order and decoration-Apparatus-What it is-Its right appre ciation-Care to be taken of it. 2. The Opening of a New School, 4