ilDING ANIJ JJRIVINC '^ Horses •mm BREEDING AND REARIHG ,. WALTER GILBEY M/ 7 ^C-^-^ 4i~J X, Riding and Driving Horses THEIR BREEDING AND REARING BY Mr. WALTER GILBEY March 1885 RIDING AND DRIVING HORSES THEIR BREEDING AND REARING Address of Mr. Walter Gilbey at the Farmers' Club, London, 2nd March, 1885, and discussion by page Lord Carrington ... 31 Mr. Edmund Tattersall 33 The Duke of Westminster, K.O. ... 35 & 39 Mr. Anthony Hamond 37 Col. KiNGSCOTE, C.B. 40 Mr. J. K. Fowler ... 42 Mr. F. Sherborne ... 44 Mr. Jacob Wilson ... 44 Major Dashwood ... ... ••• 46 Mr. T. B. Woodward 47 Capt, Fife 48 Mr. Walter Gilbey (reply) 50 ( 5 ^ RIDING AND DRIVING HORSES THEIR BREEDING AND REARING The Chair was taken by Mr. William Eve, the President of the Farmers Club. There zvas a large attendance of Members and Visitors present. Mr. Walter Gilbey, of Elsenham Hall, Elsen- ham, Essex, introduced the subject as follows; — For many years the subjects dealt with in this Address have interested me deeply. Twelve months ago I made application to Mr, Druce, the Secretary of this Club, to be allowed to call attention to them, but was unfortunately too late, all arrangements for 1884 having been then made. Very many causes have been assigned for the decline of horse-breeding. It will be noticed that I accept one only, to wit, the failure in persevering to raise animals of size, quality, and value. The prin- cipal object which I have in view, therefore, is to make our shortcomings in this respect more generally known, and to offer suggestions for breeding superior horses, as these latter will always command a ready sale at prices remunerative to the breeder. It is an admitted fact that the true-bred English hunter, hack, carriage and draught horse cannot be equalled in any other country. We may import from foreign lands corn, meat, dairy-produce, vegetables, ( 6 ) eggs, and other luxuries of excellent quality, and to an unlimited extent, but horses of a high class must be raised at home. At the present time there is a greater demand than ever for animals carrying from 12 to 15 stone, which will hunt or hack, and also prove suitable as match horses for carriage purposes. Horses of this type indeed, square-made, sizeable, with proper courage and action, can scarcely be obtained. In proof of this it is only necessary for a good judge to visit the yards of our Metropolitan and country dealers, and he will soon discover how hard and costly a job it is to pick up a London brougham horse, or a match pair from 15.2 to 16 hands in height, with good feet and legs, stylish in carriage, and workably sound. During the past few years, for such purposes buyers have had to content themselves but too often with foreign horses at extravagant prices. Hundreds of pairs of these flashy, soft substitutes, are sold yearly in London to purchasers, unconscious of their origin, at from ;i^200 to ^500 the pair, an anomaly for which it is unjust to blame the dealers when English bred horses are not to be found in the country. As the demand is thus beyond the supply, these enterprising men have now their agents on the Continent always ready to purchase the most " English " looking animals they can find, and it is only when they have been put to work that the soft, foreign " spot," is detected. To show to what an extent this foreign trade is being carried on, it is only necessary to refer to the annual returns of hor.ses imported into this country. The following table of foreign imports speaks for itself :--In the ten years between 1863 and 1872, foreign horses were imported into these islands to the extent of only 29,131 head; but in the corresponding ten years, between 1873 and 1882, no less than 197,092 head were imported. How can this alarming increase ( 7 ) be accounted for ? Supposing these animals to be of the value of ^35 each, we have a loss to this country of ^5-850,600. It was stated in the " Daily Telegraph" only as recently as the 24th March last : — " Seven years ago one of the greatest authorities upon the subject of horseflesh that ever entered a stable concluded a letter with the following inquiry: — 'What then has become of our boasted English horse ? Those that I now see are for the most part tall, leggy animals, without bone or action, and not fitted to make a hunter, or a carriage horse, or a riding horse up to any weight.' " Similar opinions to the above were expressed by Lord Rosebery's Select Committee of the House of Lords in 1873. That Committee sat seventeen times, heard evidence from numerous witnesses, and finally reported that " The deficiency of native-born English horses is due, first, to the exportation of mares to foreign countries; secondly, to the increased profits on sheep and cattle, which, from being more rapidly realised, are doubly attractive to the farmers as compared with those obtained by the breeding of horses ; and, thirdly, to the increased demand for horses consequent upon a multiplication of population and wealth." And yet, with all this, and as a proof that there has been no lack of money offered as prizes at the various shows in the United Kingdom for thoroughbred stallions, hunters, hacks, and carriage horses, I estimate that more than ^^5,000 yearly has been given away in prizes to these classes during the past twenty-five years. The subject of our present supply of horses is one also that has met with ample consideration at the hands of most competent authorities. In the 19th vol. of the " Royal Agricultural Society's Journal," Earl Cathcart remarks that, failing other writers, he was inspired to undertake, from an agricultural point of view, the difificult task of compiling some opinions on what he is pleased to call the " too long neglected ( 8 ) subject of half-bred horses for field or road, their breeding and management." His Lordship's able article occupies fifty-five pages, and, with a view of showing the importance he attaches to the subject, he remarks, " The horse is one of God's precious gifts to the nation, for our comfort and pleasure in peace, for our credit and advantage in commerce, and may be for our safeguard in war." He supports his statements by the opinions of several practical breeders, and gives also the names, extending back over twenty years, of persons asking for information on various points connected with his subject. In addition, he quotes from the reports of Stewards and Judges of the Royal Agricultural Society, complaining of the Hunters and Carriage Horses exhibited at the different Shows for a period of twenty years, from 1863 to 1883. Thus we find that in 1868, at Leicester, in a fox-hunting country, " Stallions were a moderate lot, the Hunters being especially dis- appointing." At Manchester, in 1869, " the Thorough- bred Horses were bad." At Oxford, in 1870, we were told that " Inferiority generally prevails." At Hull, in 1873, "The Show was not grand for Yorkshire." At Taunton, in 1875, Lord Cathcart says, "In Somerset- shire the Thoroughbred Horse is almost as unknown as the Dodo." The Report for the Show at Kilburn, in 1879, written by the Hon. Francis Lawley, states that no less a sum than ^1,060 was offered in classes for Riding and Driving Horses, and adds that the Thoroughbreds, however, were far from good. At Derby, in 1881, ;^ 1,000 also was offered in prizes, but the verdict was that " Thoroughbreds, never strong at the Royal Shows, were there a very bad lot, the stallions for getting hunters being few in number and inferior in quality ." The foregoing remarks seem clearly to indicate a ( 9 ) general falling off in high-class horses, and the anxiety felt in many quarters to ascertain the causes. In the case of half-bred horses it is to my mind easy to explain why these have been bred in less numbers of late years than formerly. There may perhaps be other causes besides those which I shall assign, but the most important one it seems to me is that we have failed to follow up the system adopted by our forefathers. We have, I fear, been taken off the true and direct line by reason of the often ex- pressed belief " that our best mares have left the country." I think, however, I shall be able to prove that there is no foundation for such constantly repeated, and, as I believe, baseless assertions ; but that we have still two " races " distinct in lineaee which, if properly mated, will produce mares of the type and usefulness attained fifty or one hundred years ago. To commence, I maintain that in most cases the lack of success is attributable to the dam. Every farmer who possesses a mare, whether well or ill-shaped, sound or lame, thinks her good enough to breed from. I should say on the contrary do not breed from the old mare because she is an old mare, but select from your stud a suitable two or three year old filly, and the produce from her will repay you for its keep. On this point Mr. Lumley Hodgson remarks in No. 37 of the " Royal Agricultural Society's Journal " : — " On many small holdings, now consolidated, small farmers worked useful mares and bred valuable foals." " We have lost the old useful short-legged Punch, which could ride, drive, plough, cart, or breed a hunter." " Concerning mares generally we breed from the refuse, the worn out and worthless ; yet by putting even inferior mares to good sound horses the breed generally improves. ' " A thoroughbred horse can get a valuable general purpose horse from an active cart mare — you must have one with quality, a good game head, silky mane, good sloping shoulders, good action ; but do bear this in mind, you must have game and mettle in the mare. A sluggish, coarse, heavy mare, will assuredly breed a slug. The old-fashioned and unhappily virtually extinct Cleveland could ride ( lo ) hunt, plough, and to a short-legged thoroughbred horse breed the best of hunters." It is well known that in the breeding of every species of animal the research after one quality, while it leads to greater perfection therein, is often accompanied by manifest deterioration in other attributes. Such has been the consequence of aiming at speed, while the other essentials, such as size, shape, action, and strength, have been wholly lost sight of. Horses can be reared according to the wishes and instincts of man, and the blood of the thoroughbred has been sought for and used as though pace was the first and only essential. With reference to this subject, I may quote the following remark of Mr. Booth, in support of Earl Cathcart's article : — " In addition and supplementary to blood we must have sub- stance from somewhere. Weight-carrying half-bred horses, chargers and hunters, and strong and nimble and enduring hacks, are and will continue to be for ages to come, more and more in demand, and will and must be continually, perhaps increasingly produced in their natural home — England — and that in the greatest possible perfection. And if in this affair we cannot attain to the absolute certainty of science, the convergence of many minds and many experiences towards one centre may result in the evolution of some recognised principles See for example how Mr. James. Howard, M.P., practically treats . the physiology of breeding, in his ' Application of Natural Laws to the Breeding of Horses, Cattle and Sheep.' Mr. Howard was there enabled to come to the conclusion that certain cardinal points in the art of breeding have been fairly established. Such for instance as outward conformation being derived from the male parent, the internal organs chiefly from the female, and so on." While on this question of speed and breeding, I may draw attention to another point. We often find that a mare has been mated with a thorough-bred horse because she is fast, in order to produce something still faster. She has proved to be good as a hunter, as a hack, or for driving purposes, and has already several strains of blood in her veins. Nothing, however, is known of her pedigree on the dam's side, she is smaller ( ■■ ) than the stallion to be used upon her, and her dam was perhaps no bigger than she is herself According to all established principles the produce from mares answering this description must degenerate in size, as the bulk of the foal must accord with the room through which the foal has to pass. When the male is much larger than the female, the offspring is generally of an imperfect form. If the female be propor- tionately larger than the male, the offspring is of an improved form. The improvement depends on this prin- ciple, that the power of the female to supply her offspring with nourishment is in proportion to her size, and to the power of nourishing herself from the excellence of her constitution. The size of the foetus is generally in proportion to that of the male parent, and therefore, when the female parent is disproportionately small, the quantity of nourishment is deficient and her offspring has all the disproportions of a starveling. The larger female has also a larger quantity of milk, and her offspring is more abundantly supplied with nourishment after birth. Abundant nourishment is necessary to produce the most perfect formed animal, from the earliest period of its existence until its growth is complete. The power to prepare the greatest quantity of nourishment from a given quantity of food depends principally on the magnitude of the lungs, to which the organs of digestion are subservient. To obtain animals with large lungs, crossing is the most expeditious method : because well-formed females may be selected from a variety of large size to be put to a well-formed male of a variety that is smaller. By such a mode of crossing the lungs and heart become proportionately larger, in consequence of a peculiarity in the circulation of the foetus, which causes a larger proportion of blood, under such circumstances, to be distributed to the lungs than to other parts of the body ; and as the shape and size of the chest depend upon that of the lungs, hence arises a large chest, ( 12 ) which is produced by crossing with females that are larger than the males. As an illustration of this we have the larger foal obtained from the roomy cart-mare crossed with a thoroughbred stallion, in comparison with the opposite cross of a thoroughbred mare with a cart stallion. The foregoing opinions of Henry Cline are deduced from experience gained upon his farm at Southgate, in the last century, and are supported by all the most eminent practical breeders, such as Bakewell. Cully, Somerville, Parry, and others : as well as by most theorists, among whom we may mention Dr. Coventry, — who wrote a pamphlet in 1806, entitled "Remarks on Live Stock," — and also Darwin, Hunt and Young. That the size and value of horses bred in Ireland have decreased is easily discernible by those who remember their former excellence, as contrasted with the exhibits during the last few years at the Dublin Shows. For one sizeable animal up to weight or fit for coach or carriage purposes, there are at present twenty-five small undersized horses, most of them not weighty enough to pull a London Hansom cab. In reality, in trying to meet the demand for hunters and steeple-chase horses, the craze for blood to go the pace has been increasingly in the ascendant, and size and substance have been consequently lost. Ireland being a country which still holds its name as a large producer of horses, it is certain that very many of the best hunters in England still come from there. Nevertheless, the percentage of square-made, sizeable, riding and driving horses is getting smaller and smaller every year. As a rule, it must be admitted that Englishmen have not made a study, or given much thought to breeding horses, with ' the exception of racers and of massive beasts of burden for draught. The intermediate animals, other than the race-horse or the draught-horse, have been bred by accident ( '3 ) or caprice, and are of mixed lineage. This brings me to the theory which, above all others, I am anxious to impress upon your minds. To my thinking there are only two distinct and definable types of the equine race, the Thoroughbii at this subject from a scientific point of view have comil' to the conclusion that it would be better if we were? stricter as regards the rules as to eligibility for entry.' The first consideration is that the good points shall be maintained and developed in a horse, and therefore the observation I have made will exactly tally with the suggestion of Colonel Kingscote, namely, that if entire horses are spread all over the country, it will be to the farmers' interest to use either a stud-book horse or a medal horse — that is to say, one which has won a prize at a country Show or been highly commended, and in this way the inferior horses now travelling the country would be set aside. Captain Fife : No doubt it is greatly with the view of what the last speaker has said that the Show and prizes for thoroughbred stallions have been started. We hope it may develop what the last speaker has said, namely, that the bad horses which are not good enough to win prizes will be driven out of the country for the ( 49 ) want of patronage, and that the good ones will be brought to light by being awarded prizes, and thus these owners who have good horses will find that they have plenty of custom for them. His grace the Duke of Westminster said that he always found that the list for his stallions was very well filled up, and I have no doubt that other good horses would get the same patronage. With regard to the remarks that were made as to the breeding of nag horses paying, I believe that if farmers would breed from younger mares — if they would go and buy a three-year-old filly from an Irish drove, that three-year-old would keep growing into money. The purchaser might keep her for two years, and then sell her as a five-year-old at a profit, and at the same time, instead of lying idle, the mare might breed a foal, and the owner would not have the expense of the keep of the brood mare to add to the r )st of the foal, the brood mare having paid for her eep by being sold at a profit. That is one way of .laking breeding pay. The other way is by working che dam and thus making it earn its keep — working it on the land, or using it for general harness purposes. Breeding from mares kept solely for breeding purposes cannot have as good a chance of paying as by following the above alternatives. There is no doubt that something should be done to improve our supply of mares in the country. A mare as a brood mare has no special value as she ought to have, and I think if prizes were given for the best brood mares at this Stallion Show another year, it would be a move in the right direction, and I also think that there should be a class for mares that have never been put to the stud, but which are suitable for breeding hunters. I think that many people who have a mare, perhaps without any intention of breeding from her, might say I will show her in this class. They might show her, and perhaps they might win a prize, and that very likely would be an inducement to the owner to breed ( 50 ) from that mare, whereas otherwise it might not have entered his head to do so. I came this afternoon quite unprepared to address you, and I beg you to excuse all my shortcomings. I wrote a letter in the " Field" last week, which expresses my views more clearly than I have been able to express them to you now. With regard to a stud book, that is an idea to which there are a great many objections. I think that more people object to it than approve of it, and I proposed, as you may see in my letter to the " Field," an alternative which might improve the breed of brood mares without establishing a stud book. It was that all mares who win prizes or are commended at the Shows should be entered in a book, and that this book should not be called a stud book, but " Hunters' Prize Book." Prize stallions would be entered in the same way, and of course, if the produce of the prize mare and prize stallion again got entered in this book that animal would be very valuable as a brood mare. I think this would add a great deal to the value of the brood mares in this country, and perhaps the owners of good animals would be very likely to think twice before parting with them. By this means they are more likely to be kept in the country instead of going out of it. The Chairman then put the question, which was carried unanimously. Mr. GiLBEY, in reply, said — Mr. Chairman, my Lord Duke, my Lords, and Gentlemen, I fully appreciate the vote of thanks which you have passed, and in replying to the various remarks made during the discussion, having taken up so much of your time, I shall endeavour to be as brief as possible. First, as to the thoroughbred horse, I had no intention of disparaging this animal, because, for turf purposes, I believe he has been bred with more speed and consequently is more valuable, for the greatly increased number of races, and high value of the stakes for which he now competes. I will, however, refer ( 51 ) you to the engravings and paintings of " Marske," " Eclipse," " Mambrino," and " Shark," and I think you will then admit that thoroughbreds, at the present time, although they have increased in stature four inches in the past hundred years, have not, at any rate, the attributes of strength they had in the last century. To realize this fully, it is perhaps necessary that you should have the same faith in Stubbs that I have. My belief is, that he could only portray on canvas the animals as he saw them, and we have in the pictures I have here with me the thoroughbred as he existed in his time. As to the remarks of my friend, Mr. Edmund Tattersall, I should state that I am not a believer in Government assistance for the objects we have in view. Private enterprise has carried us thus far. If we wait for State aid, the loss to the country will be still yearly going on ; and "while the grass is growing the steed is starving." Again, it has been stated that in certain parts of England, where Thoroughbred stallions have been located, they have not been patronized by farmers and others. This does not coincide with my experience, neither with the experience quoted by His Grace the Duke of Westminster. My stallions have been for years well patronized, the Service fees regularly paid, and yet they do not travel, but serve mares at my own Paddocks only. On the all-important point of breeding, I should scarcely have ventured to make the propositions I have done here to-day if I could not have supported them by quotations from well-informed writers, giving many satisfactory results of mating Thoroughbred Stallions with Draught mares. I am sorry circumstances do not allow of my reading many letters on this subject, received from practical breeders, expressing as they do approval of my ideas in regard to the mating of Thoroughbred Stallions with Draught ( 52 ) Mares. I regtet also that Mr. G. M. Sexton has been prevented attending this meeting ; it was his intentiont to be here ; his experience is interesting. He has been successful in breeding, three years in succession, from a Suffolk mare, and each year by different thoroughbred stallions. The produce —three in number — he has sold when young, realizing nearly ;^6oo, and they have turned out very valuable weight- carrying hunters. I could enumerate many other successful instances which have come under my notice, but will only mention one more. A nephew of mine put a thoroughbred mare to a draught stallion. The produce was a filly which when two years old he put to "Reality," Mr. Flanders' famous Hackney stallion, and as a result he has a yearling which is sizeable, with good action, and promises to turn out valuable. I may add also that I am a believer in the use of the Hackney stallion for cross-breeding — provided suitable mares are mated with him — as he will assuredly impart to his progeny that high trotting action not to be obtained in such perfection in any other way. As to the suggestion offered by His Grace the Duke of Westminster to add the word "young" in the last paragraph (C). I willingly accept the proposition, as my meaning is fully in accordance therewith. In reply to Mr. Woodward, I have already said it is an admitted fact that the true-bred English hunter, hack, carriage, and draught horse cannot be equalled in any other part of the world ; therefore, with the old stock now in the country, with proper food, and the love w^hich every Englishman has for the noble animal, we may still hold our own. Depend upon it there is more in these things than in either climate or soil. -?*.*>■"; S