i  U E:PRSoPo’uI1\:DE1! O t  is
To George W l7l't§l)€dC! and s George Fox, who ‘difputed
bytru ms agaittflone 'Z}Izi5?/er»/it):LM4;z‘?i;1 _(;4m[;,»-‘,2  .1   l 

h‘ V  1133.; .19. 165.9‘. a  K"...-B.,‘*_    V
H/III) the S umme of t/)téz'r;A7ifwer5 and */91': Reply 5 
‘/i’£lI1([.5‘~](‘0_}"0716'): Rep. for the other.  L s  '- V

-he

Retzdergrir i g   _ L ‘i t g e
Epleafedto take notice that whereas the Quakers deny-e divers
L matters {poke and donein this publick. difpiutee, the witnefles to
them are thefe following Gentlemen -: l\/It...;Sc;\:z2a'meet,.s.Mt... Vivian, 
Bdmérzggt fellowes of T. .C.?Sr. 'R2wc/*2 Sr. Crojdm .a—nd:others oftheiame
M1‘.  .SymeS,and Mr. E. Barr} neerflmai/1; Call. Sr. iC/mppell of E. C. Mr.
Angler and Mt.Parkcr both ancient M.A. Mr. Angier Draper Mr. Alders,
MR 5[)6’i2f", Mr.gj‘enn;’22g5, Mr. Wright, S1‘.F’z}3ce7zt of C. H. Sr. H olérook and
Sf-.“,3,r3‘C.£?’?7,.°l; 5F-  C, befidé; divers 0-fSidi2cy. and: other Colleges;
d1V€f5_0.. ,,.47:i3W,€” 3_rld..W-B¢’4.ChaI1d:0th€r ‘townes gbefides Mrs Danafozs
b..°°_kb~l.l‘.d§¥. %‘1d e9¥1h€.r_.zz>o2rie22,- too many. to.name;here: Now. judge
Wh1fh€,1?_3l1 tl1€f€.(ha1fe whereof know not the faces of each other )
C311 COIWPIIC. to belie the Qiakers in behalf ofthe Relater; or whither
0“ 9;” ‘W0 Cllakérs. bi‘: rather to becteclitecl then a Jury ofthefe. t

1-  not you, 1‘.epe'nt-for your endeavouring vainliyto. de— l
‘ “ l fend Aug. 29. I659.in fo gteata Congregation theft:
  pofitions-printed in a book writ by George Whitehead
  rt/iz.~_ .I._~*That the Bible is not the word o£ God.
P-.1 .“ av 2..s.That to‘afl:er‘t the-Scr'z'pt»2reis-at/2e:IjI41ra' of God,‘ is oncof the
i  'de.ceitfull imaginations which the Priefts ofthis generation.
have ‘deceived thepeople with. .
3. That he who afferts therebe three pctfons in the blefled  
Trinityi5ad1‘(f3II1CI'3ndaCOnjUf€I'. 5 - - "  . , ._ .
p, 10;}, t 4. That he who aflerts there bethree fuéh perfo-nsfgfhallbe '
1-all. nfhutu ‘With them, in perpetuall ldatknefs for‘ the lake and.
the pit. Anf. Tbefe pofitiofzs are accorkliizg to the Scriptures of
truth. Rep.LetanyChrifiian judoe !_ ..
V 7\ -2. Did

 
  

" i_2.  not you ofiiendi God by iallerting ‘there  then (at the con?

clufion of your difpute) that thefame thing at the fame time and place
might be both vifible and invifible, plainly feen by the eyes of many
men( andimis uponvrecord-)-and yet ‘ impoffible to be feenat that time
and place? Anl.:NQ_;; Rep. I‘appeal1to all the';Audit0rs.  
. 3. Ifyou {till think this true, may you notbe (as your Opponentin:-‘
ferred) a'Quaket andno Q1aker,aPapiPc and no Papift, a Heretick
and no Heretick, atthe fame time and place? Anf. «Fool.
 4.. Do you think -’tisthe partofa good Difputant to deny thecon-¢
clulion of a f yllogifme , as you there and then did leverall times toge-
ther .> Anf. T/ac oomlufiom werefolfe. Rep. Let the Reader judgc.{
5 .— .Why do you; fleight both.   [ the Sacraments,] \’Vater- Bap tifmi
and Ihehceiving Breadand Wine in the Lords Supper? which the Scri-
}2tu,re,,.faith'~ are ineeeflat‘yteto"Salvati!on. For Chrifi "faith ]oh.¢6. 53.

Vetily,tverily~extept ye eat theflefh of the Son ‘ of man, and ’ drink i his.
blood“, .ye‘have‘:no;life in you. Ye fay that ye have life though ‘you do

not eat, .8zc. Chrifl faith, Take eatido this in remembrance o'fme.You fay
do not take, do not eat,’ do not do this, 81¢. Chrifi faith, verily, verily ex-
ccpta manbe born. of water (Mark water ).andof'the Spirit he'can-
not enterinto theKingdom**of God; .you>fay,”that' no -man'eneed_rojbe

baptized, he may euterinto the;Kingdom offleaveir thou  he ‘°Beynto;t.? i

1'-inf. There is no fuck word as Sacmmmt 2'72 tire’ 7Stripture.i‘:R_q2.' "Nor _is there

any fuch word as incarnation or fatisfafiioiutihereforei you think you r'nay;_i

deny the things meant by thefowords‘. The Apoflle of forbids men to-
quarrell about words : and while H. D. jibes at three Bees andhthe ax..-
gum ent for three'Perfons taken from the places,'heiconfi§er§"{ not éhag:
T. S. was neceflitated to condefcend to vulgar capacities‘§‘*‘who. cryed
out they would hear no Philofophy or School~te‘rmes. But Whereas you
call me oftkaolt-Papfi for this tyuery, and tell a Viiory ( by;;}§g;veg) of
the Major p. ‘54. my anfwet to t at and this,is that ifyou and your info -
met will: neither learn your catechifm, which faith [ the body and
blood of Chrill is verily and indeed taken, Sic. ] nor heed any of the
Reformed Churches, who all fay the fame in their confeflions ( as‘ they
are cited by Dr. T Ailer, Auécrtimaind Fomoheur) not believe the H. Apo-
- - les nor Jefus hirnfelf (who laid t/via‘ is my 504/y;s')y Yet hear your friend:
Bunion who in his fightrfoiam an pl. 129. faith that job. 6. 53. is meant
of the Lords Supperror at leafl: give fome ear to your own comrades fa.
Audlmd, }'. Nayler, and A. P. thcframcrs of your zmfwer to the perféff

 

W14-n'j?«:e : wherein p618; 1:’; 2 ii. are chereewotds, itbe head ’iz§£:z’éI2 

éreak was theiéody of C bfifi. Doycm take all  todbe 7471»? Papi'fl1s,> I
acknowledgChriPts piefenee,Tbut'I.ever denyed the Roman ‘m'arz}2e‘rtran-
fubllantiation. t 4 e 5 .  L _e   _   i  i   _‘e
6; Iseit not evident that fome ofyou   'n_1o_r”e;_Jtor lefé )' 
pofl"efl"edwiththeeDevill,' Whenefahn 6&’_lpin  hilsibook,atte{led'b'y the-
Maior and chief men in Kendall, confe eththat lb: was " poilieffi with
the7Devill while he was a Qlaker 5' and divers ‘ of your {elves   confefs,
in Sauls errand pt, 4. 5~._That at fome of your meetings many"_mcn,% we-

men and little Chilélien; has%3ei1been"il’£ran'ge’ly‘iwrought upon   bo;'-  

diesé, "land btoughtttg. lfal,I*,”* '1 foam‘ ‘at.  the 1‘r1outh;"itoa‘r,e "and-ijfiiléll

bellies .2 Anf. T bark is lye; Rép.5Let ‘the: Rezadet colifult’the'bool<sf 
lieve his own eyes. You deny not that 701222 Gilpin was poflefi with lithe

Devil while he was a Qlaker 5 iyouitfay thac_allfq pc}ll'"el?c.'are ;1o£;’Qua-

kers:nomanfaith,they=be."  e _  .-       
—  "DO‘l1;Of you     
any chapters in; che'B1ble -f%_> :Anl.”Tea ofgreatéif   i   »i  

8. Do not you hold‘ it unlawfull to exp.oi11_n(lfViog:i,nte;piét;"thefjl.
Scriptures .3“ Anf. e -"T13 latiwfullfbriuS'3 :(72ldWfullf‘Q'rj5u to‘ '1}!/z'>d%

Al

filial»:-. ; Rep. Exit 1 hopej’3’ti'se‘lawfi1;ll‘ for us to intetp(etfq‘I_1€__;e;l§,tjof Scrip‘-j-_ -

cure by anothe’riand:’by3the'®riginal Lalaguagég;   I ‘

- 9. ‘Do not fome‘ =of)?ot1'f_a')"r i that he  who    ‘Teiit ' his a
‘_ Conjurer, Sic. lflnfi Tegxandfb artthou. ‘ F  i ‘   e ’

i I 0. That the HolyiBibl_e ought to be ’bntnti?‘Anf. A wickcifllye. Rep.
566 your book Cl1tltLil.e€l’°Tr3-M15 idefehfe writ  Fax, L  Huéerthom,
and T. A;/ti-'/lfoiz, p.  l.’ 1'3. "a’hd"di\(ei's ‘other ‘;bQO_ks’Lwhereil1i theyipre-3
fete the H. Scripture‘ to the fire, andftheir own bobkseto mens reading
as more ufefull for thefe times; ' . t A i ” L i

I I. Do not you think it needlefle to pray forithe parclon ofyoiif fins?
Anf. -We didprayfarit éefore wewefc Qtakers. _   4 
’ I2. D" not you believe that there ° no heaven not hell,» not ’other
world after this_lifc' ?   H111‘, N5. ' ‘_ J ‘ T A ’ ’ i I  L 7 I i
i I 3. Do you believe that all thele bodies which are met here this day

{hall depart out of this life and that they {hall rife again atthe 1af’t day. A

A-_ Thom: ignorant of the nature of ‘differekt 13545.5 434 61"ig°"‘?€’? 504565: R?!-
I have the “fame body tl1a‘t‘I had ' yéllerdfayi thbugh  ,if.f¢ff.  qualities:
Ifyou ‘fay that the fame"pét§on%*that'blafphefneel God, efl3a%l’l'-not be damn"-
ed , but Tome other for him gjyotfieovertlhtow in ‘lthis ; ’( as in other’ fore-

‘ -   A 2   mentioned

 :nentionedood95trinc$D a1§—C~1arif*iaa t¢1.igi0fl:E Y§95*.argU.¢o againfi mchffi?
jufi aé the Pagan‘ in }Z1Zi}2uii%as7rIfélZ5¢  3 2. did againit Chriflianity. i_

"14. Donotyo’ faythét.thetMagifit_ate who makes A615 of Parlia-
mentianddothin-ot receive them from God, as‘Moj2’sodi’d,a dot»h,_,a€’c
contra__r,y§t,o_ the law ,of God’ 2 as;Irea,d iL1:l:h'¢ ,bO0k,~ca1l,ed fiery darts of

\

'  1’¢?ii?i1l:<1ii?€???’-’€”7eXe???fiéd5YiC4l?‘i¢£?: Lissa énd"fuBf¢rib5d ‘byafix Qla"

.k‘e’:rs‘¥_>‘}_’ ‘ 'A11f.‘}‘ed. A   - ’ 1 . ‘_i _
o 15'. Do not’ you fayiin the famebookjthat the H. Scripture is’ not the
Saints rule,’ not the ground of his faith, p; 19, Not the Saints guide,
not the ;u1¢_c;;f faith;a.nd.’patieonce,i.jpag; go; }a1;1d_3 thegfame book.
;$<>is"§i‘1If.5:f<?. #1? Z24 I" 9: :4}..S.~.:‘3i1d.d ° BY filche aadoéfrincs‘ and rcfu~
fitigtbfa take it-h'e“o§1thtof ahjurati_;_on fel‘ve_s_to  P‘ap{ft_5._> -Ami.
tlz'oi{{'ozo'g‘2z_a';f.o¢-222 Papifi. if ‘the Sgripturésjrfere not tloe,Saii2‘t,$ guide oéefare they
z’rj¢é,i"oe‘iz$rZi,t_h¢‘z‘éfore« I ,cozfclade the} were not the’ Saiigtgguiclcz afiertlaeyh. are Wit.

_ ' "#1 Isif not Confeffed by your {elves in .S_'aL’iI§:.erraz1d';p.;. T4,- tan‘cLi.att-

tefiecl by £<2v@ralLGo¢nt1¢l11€na(tJuf1i¢9?i°f -P§%€E5—;aMiI9§£i€f$~o,Qf§oIh€-g0{'
   in  Lrlfltaiffqxj Ithg;  you   . deft;-1' ne 3
that break the relation‘ offubjefis to their Magi_firates_,. yyiyesooto ghcir
husbands, ch1ldrjei‘17to their parents, fervantsivtoo, their‘__*Mafler5,fcon-
gr¢gationS.t0 th€’itiMi13if.*é¢xSa.:tn§1«<éf. aa9¢op1<%;ro_etth9ir $§9di.#,Axw£ Gar
'cz’o8;*ii;ré$‘2‘er2c1§ to theéfehkiféfiglirgé ogelaggqgr, §e12l.;jI;§e§;gios.yg)u .thii1k,.t}}eft§
¥“?:“.‘1F?F‘.31‘¥-Fi?‘;‘5v .5€rI}b1a.i1¥,€;m»Y°.u_r»7mi\a¢r:.w“ sh:« Proud» r>harifee )
you ray that relations dOlnCfi1§.313«C§§ efiafiical‘ and political are not
founded on the law of God and goipiel, of_Lhr1I’t pt 34.»  . _
‘ 17‘. Doyou who c_a1l,yo:urrielg.{e_s_;Sa1i1ts  ;nr..this life}. Anf.No
l2ic’*¢t‘b‘a;t_’z'5:§orI2i '0f'G;0;f1:oV0e-Ii?» S  1'3 .6,Rep;The Ttext, is
ZN?-'~.0:‘IE:~£€'((’¢‘f‘7vl’d73‘_h.€ maketh notoVaotrade.ogf:fin_, See  Haznzrzofids Cateehifm
L 1.35. for youacititiins from Igrovgx 1.8zc.be pleafed to obfervc that
 W ame wor W ’c_ in one 0 out laces is inter reted zer eé? is in
the other tranflated upright <5 tokteacth uS.t1i13t' it doth n(F))t: iign-i‘Ifyj(Casz you
W°U1d.ha_Ve;it) 0135 that isa1to'g,e§her.fteefIOI1f1:fin .( for;,.the fame .5910-
inon‘ faith there ‘is not a j'uf’c man upon earth that finneth not,“ '. Eccl.  2 o.
§ee Prov.24.16.:_{K1ngs.8.46. 2 Chro. 6. 36. am. 3. 2.) but him who
ln‘t:h¢,.C_iefi1;e of h1.sihLearttis fteeoftom hypocri re, whom we call uprigéat.
Thus ojfifczzlz, fardé, yea, Davi;1,'o Ezekiala, and others, areocalledo pferfeét,
i-eaupriahtzmcflthougbatheybadfaU1rs:Af4 ihad a.perfE8 ilzeart 411 his dos
:3  in'the? nc_i(t..cha}.’>.;i  fin-d _;3”+.gtO.{.sii'ins of his togcthtf-.
__ ‘T "18,.  ‘youfiill of opinion, that  aflitin if any man fay he hath no
;fit1hc deceivcs himfelf, 15 to affirm a falfity as.concc-rning the Sa1I1tS

o‘z:"(11-akers .2-t Which youraffirlmediin the Majors houie.  I fihhél A

not in opinions, hut if the aj]um7;ce of this truth, for C hrzfl was 4 mm. Rep.He
is God and man 3 not bare man, and fo he infiingeth not this rule.
  '   I 9. Did not you fin lafi week in faying that the unfvcrfitic. man
preacht‘ for hire, and made bargaines for his Miniiieriall offices,and took
ten {hillings for a Funerall Se_rrn'on, ifyou can not prove thefe things .2
You fee he denies them all, and {ayes he never took a penny for a flute-
ral Sermon inhis life,8£c. Idefire youto prove them all, or tell me whe_-
ther flanderingbe a fin A in you, ;Here infiead-of praying, 3vo;;,agk’z;§,g','Z,,1,g,..
tifieizt "que._{h°to72s, ahaut Ir/yachting for hire, r dnoiththepeaples  at Cail_cl,e-t
core, to hath which the 21/zfmér is, No : Ma’ that the Contraryis <:liearie‘nou:zah
from the certificates at the end of the ;3th‘.query.   i ii
a . 2-o. VVherea-so a book in:-tituled, Fieryxdarts, faith p.‘ '2 6. ,that trmce
the Apotlzles dayes there hath been a great APOiiaCj7,‘a11€i that a true
Church of-Chr'if;’crcou.ld not befo'u‘nd:are you of the fame _1nii1d?Anf;2”m.;
 ~ 2.2.1. .-Do .Iytot'i mean thafithere was never a true Church to5be'fo‘und
aftoin the Apofiles dayes‘till' now? 1 t C ,
2 2. Iffo, what became of the Church all the while .> Or do you con-
fefs ’twas not in being 2 Anf. The true Church hath hem in 11.7.7‘/f1.€l'€_'7”i2t:[i ha,’

,efl4.’e.A Rep, Unlefs you tell us how long ithath been fo,   -you cloasgood

as fa-y nothing, provethat iitwas fo for I isoo. Years;  ‘ ' ” ’ . l ;~ ,
, 23. Ilifo, how was Chrifi true to his 3 promife, who {aid he would be
with his Church tothe end of the world? He ‘could not be witha Church
rh?2t..was notin being ?Anf. Foélifla mzhed mviozzs man ! ,‘Rep.c Fzzrzzfzaarrhs

ani. to all’-‘<‘£.l”P. I 7.fai.th,=that Chrifihad not a vifible Church in the wolrd. ii

  J  grab. 3’Vhat think i you becamiet of all-gthe Martyrsfor the  three
‘b1Z1r1§lr<:§l Y-‘ears rafter C'l:rril‘t,. or of -’ti1'é>‘{€7i in Englaafl in’Q;:Mahié§ dayes 
Y7€‘:r3_t they favedorgnot .37 Anl”.iVViilliam Brute,-‘aim’ VViliiain Tharp Pvité
716]] ad flgaiizfl Tythes. Rep.Tho;9p being charged ‘with Tayingj that Pricfls had
no title tQ.:Titl1€S, anfwered, ‘that   hot: the g’ w,ord’1fTithes‘in-hi's
préachings Q-...6:69¢~.* 1. 4:9} and Bfzzt}: enz:le'aj5'oiirs'~‘jiot»-t‘(i5~prove-;C but ‘ti
art? C1116 by a profitable law of man, p. 6 3 2. l. gr,’-f;—f In'yfhor’t'-ouE‘of7_ ‘moo
Martyrs two i-night erre in {ome one mam 4 of -{mall Tconeerrirhent,‘ ( St.
C3}?/fa22[eL1),1'fi.2 3 .2 5.a‘nd el{where]‘obfer’ves errours in {ome-of themin his
dayesi) yet»-being farfrom Qaalcers go t0‘H(2a’\i/€511" 3: I have Oli)li€“i‘_\’i(’Ci,iitl'l?.£

{farce any.peopie;iutthelworldhorriplusiniiiagaiiiii‘tithes‘as anofsprcifion, .

l..>\1.!:r{uCb as you .W..a?nd,l+?;i%that.tnever pa7idany’.‘9;  §l7‘ho_a}fie' Was againfi

fWCaring-  abook and fo am~I~, fee the éen‘tury oftjueries. i C   A
2 5. Why do you cenfure our Clergy, and us Chriftians for trying your
_' C . ’ ’ Spi-

{U}, — a

(Spirits, whenthe Apofile aids ustry tbe'Sfz?£ts .> Sure then there is afalfe

and a true Spirit, and how can we try which is true or falfesbut by the

jScriptui.es..2 Anf. the Apafile aids not yoga ‘try the jjzirits gforyou areflout of
  tbefzzvozireand life ofthe annoynting : 7401‘ £120! John  them. try itbejjairits
6} the Scripture. Rep. If they were to try the Spirits by the Spirits they  

were to .run_1n a circle. For your cenfurihg melee Rom. 14. 4. 1. ]o. 4.

.1. But is not this your forbiding all men to try the Spirits by the; scri-

ptute an evid,entargument that there is no light in you Ifa. 8. zog" A i
2 6.‘ Do you think that Fornication in a«Q1aker is fin;

i it 9 27?.‘HofW do You !know, ;that Fotnication is a fin. in one that is a

A Quaker, but  the Law and t1tc5Gofpel1_,>— Anf. they that are izifbrrzzkatz;

on are déizyed by  Rep. then you muft deny your bofom-companion and
fellow preaching (11al<er,C. At/€i12f0l¢. Read his confeflion printed for

‘ _Mr.,I’z”;mklin Bookfeller of1V0rm'dy,     *

  8; How dogyou lcnow there is ,a;S}71rit5£i3or: a  ? - a i
 f  Isirhe Morall Law, a fule toa (Shamans life?’ An{. “T/aau mi 12;
2:5 noéllafk if!/ye marall law 6: a rule to~CbriflL% ;Rep. No, not {O well; $0":

a Qhrifi is the law-giver, and we his {uhje<9ts.. r

_ 30. Do you approve the doings of thofe, Men and Women, who
lye tOg‘Ct,_l_:1‘€'r, naked in the   Street:s,’fatherhhg,it; upon the Spirit. Anfi. No,
:R6‘[I.ti1€l-1 you muft not ¢_s{wn fame: I«'.m2al~~for-Is~hav:ea paper of h1S where-
§1.he.:l!el£et_1cll1s11§,aF<;l faith ’-tisa fign of ;im;1O.cfence 4-: -and I hear, May;/9;;
_zmo22sa1tteame. _ t    

31. \/Vhereas aWeaver again-fithei mind of his Wifes followed a
company of you from Canton. to Cainéazdgeg,‘ i-ntreating you ( all the away )
to tell hl}n\'W:hayt your R€llg1Q11.W3§3811Ci'-hOW he mlghtscome t0»b€? of

your Religion, and syouggavei  no other anfwer but this, ‘that he

fltould follow the light within him: So he asked you what that was,
and ye would not tell him, I defire to know what it 'is,ithat men
rnay_fundtr{iand _.Wh3U.Q,.I.3k€;h(?Qd.tO 2 Anf. Sat limit are tafollona the
{:;g'I2ta,«’.C_1;7i§_££22;/2em.;:,Kfpa'fiill-y  :lffl3~{C= to tell the weaver What that
1ti%lic:0f€hri&ih tllfilfi. is.   kn,    2    ~    ‘  5   1

3-2. Is not your meanéing this, that the Ambitious man fhould follow
his ambitious Spirit, the lafcivious than his wanton Spirit, &c.

33. Ifyou fay that this is not your meaning, how can you allure me
that another publili Preacher of.the-{Qmkers will itotitell me i to mor-
row, that by the Spirit he means this 2 Since. after . the -Unitferfityman
had pu-blickly proved divers blafphemies to he in twbitéheaéis; Book,” you
George Fox defired the peopleat laft to take notict-,~‘ that the {aid book
s ' was

(7)

vtras not yqurshut his, vtiith  the univerfity   ted;
by the M.a1or to difpute. ’ . ?Anf.« This is «filthy lye. Rep‘. Forty people 

witneffe the truth‘, ofswhat Iaflitme here. ‘ _ _
34. DO you Gearge Poxfi-ill ptofefs your felfto  the eternall Judge
of the World,ande‘ the way,the ttuth,and the life ,>Anf.lier‘.‘Tha7t is aodefpe.

me lye. Repgl befeechethe Reader to ‘fee Saul: Erhmzdp. 2‘. 8:: 7.and:the 5..

page of TOW emfwer to the Pierfefi Pharzfee, and then judge who is the lyer.

h 3 Did RichArdfiHuhhert/agglgfvell in writing that Chrifis COming in

t e elhwasbuta source? ‘  ‘Tea. ‘ ‘s . I ‘ . ’ ‘W

36. Did’ théft(11iiket fin therein or to-1ot,g who’ brou’  lfately,j_ion the
Lords-day, an old Duhletin. Dr. 63115 Church in Lonfion‘, and fat upon-
the Communion Table mending it,while the Dr.was preaching, the Pa-
rithioners forbidding him.Anf. He filmed not wilt thouflill eonfimtea P apifl?

37. If theSaints ‘need not be taught  men, (as you fa-yi)h'i_s Iithot
needlefs for youcoceach one _ati0thet'? Ami. The lS.¢ii¢ts‘i zzcfeel ‘ma M2171 fé
teachthem. 1‘ c C , C‘    r ' I. C

38. Dds you think it aTcnants Duty to pay rent to his Land—lord .2
Anf. is the Tenants Duty to render to’ all their due. Rep. ‘But Ibelieve
you do not’ “think rent due to any that be not (yakers.

' 3:9.‘ Whereas there is forne talk by {ome Qiakers of dividing mens
efiatesancl havinc all things common, do you believe that it is lawful!
and fitting EC)‘ to '0? Anf. '1' he Qua/terse do not talk /5. Rep. Witnefs
5‘. Re rzer an others.  as C

4oy.D_o you not think that the Clerc have as much to;fhew-for taking
tythes, as anyrnan i111-Ziekglazm’ hath or taking tentyfor land left him by
hts Ancefiours .> '*A_nf.. 7j¢thes‘had their orzginallfhom the Pope. Rep. You
fhfeouldh prove, not barery fay fuch things; efpeciallyshwhen the contrary
hatlghefen manifeftly p"roveclby'fun’dry learned men whofe works none»
yet ‘ave attem ted to anfwer.   .   y ‘

-fart. Do youfhot think it as la‘wful'l tobereave a-ll men of the one as
o the other .3’ ' T   C

42. Do you think in good eatnefla that ’tis lawfull for ‘Nomen to-
preach in the Church, as you aflerted publickly lafi yweek? and that

St. Paxls prohibition concerns onely married women, not Virgins and
Widoxvesgif you think {o,thenI ask further, why you may not fay as
well,i that the feaventh Commandment concerns onely married wo-
men, and not Virgins and widowes. Anfitl zzever afimzeel than Rep.
myoidid affitni it E. S. R.W. and divetsothers will witnefs.I gram:

.68) 

 in the firfi rifewof they Chrifcian. Church fome women did foretell

things tocome (according to fuel 2. :8. ) it doth not thence follow“ “

may preach and/{peak in the Church.  - a

that therefore now} ‘when propheeying. is ceafed) any Qaaker women
3. ‘When you tell us that you have faithin Chrilhdo you mean.

’Chril't whofe’pe‘rfoin is now afcended into heaven obove the Clouds or

do you mean onelya Chrifl within you. Anf. Chris? we wimrj}.

44. Did not Edward Burrough, James Naylor, and others atfitm5
‘that he who expefls to be faved by that Jefus Chrifi who dyed at fem-
falgzp, {hall be deceivyedy Anf, No. Rep. See their two _Books,' and the
‘brief relationof the Northern Quakers, p. 22;. 85c. Billjngflics defenfe
ofscriptures, p. I 6. The perfe€’cPhari{ee, p. '8. and Farmers myflery
ofgodlineifs. and ] Nailors anl. to Higgenfim p. 8. Truths dgfenfe p. 95,

45. .Do not you George Whitehead blafphernoufly take to your felfan

attribute of God, while youpretend ordinarily to know. the hearts of i

men .3 And tell’Mr.‘ T ozvzzfezzd of Norwich ( Ifiymaelp. 2.) that he is de-
parted from the light of God in his Confcience. Anf; ftoke no drtriéutc
of God to m_yelf hut what (3051 hath grim me. Rep. Prove that God Hath
given your the gift ofinfallibility and to know mens h_eart_s,»ando Ilefub-
mic rovou. But {urea man tl1atkt1o,v§}'es,not what j is in my ypogkgtg

I

knowestnot what is in my heart. p . 4 . , A p  7 .
_ 46. Do not you ( to ufe your own words ) Walk: ix the flops of the falfi,»
P/ophets, ‘while you Ordinarily {peal<”and print {uch railing language,’ as
pag. 3. of your Ifhmael. fhozz pricfi Ypotvie [E2261 , their dramzcr, thou o{c'ceit‘L’-t
er, 2rvzI"ch, lier, éliizdgztidc, poi:/:0”: Chriffafldy l.7l.5.£'30W‘lCdg.3 and in A,:e,vt.;'g]m'fi
t’i£c’J?1}'0_fG0v5l’,ié‘:6'. A/yj’. True, ’tis a.CC015di11g to Sctipture.. y ‘ V 
 VVa_s it any thing to the purpofe in the midfi of a difpute con-
cerning points of faith to ask the ll-niverfity man, what he thought of
51‘. George Booth? Was not this quefiion a lllly trap laid. for him who
defired nothing but to reduce you from ‘ Herefy .3; Ahfl that ‘my éecaufb
Zh)01£fl'l129(’fi Booth Jia’ riot prafjzer. Rep.iHow know you that .> If he did not
profpt-r, that was more thanl {aw or knew then. s —

- 48- Do not we live in a fine age when fueh men as you can be per-
mitted in aCorporation Town (in (‘.<znzhrz'dge one of the eyes of the
Nation) to rail an hour together;~agai11fi Ch-rift jefus, andthe other
two perfons in the ever B".L'fl‘CCl .Tri22z't;y and againfi, the Holy word of
G3} 5 ‘*2 n..l in the fame Moneth a Miniiier of the Gofpellgfon to a Parli-

a._*1'1;nt-man, was {cut for by a Co1npany.of Souldiersl_>y the Major, and

i ikept-.pri{oner_for11._e itimegferyrayingrforatll.GhrifiianKiugé. 3Prinées,’ and
Governours, rI.,Tim_. 2.1. Ani. Yisrdmyed.Rep.-\Nitnefs tIhe-Parliament* '

mans {on-, diversio-f Queens College, and of the oCommifl71oners.
-49.. What- cgredit may. the Cammozz-people give to any thingéyou fay

whi1e4a5:rSchQ1a£ near,5 when. they have heard?. you: proved u_ndeni'a+ v  

ably to b_e_a_jsAdamna‘b,le an Heretick as euerrwas in the world, from
that very place in Scripture which was the only text you brought to
‘prove your felvesrno Heteticks, -2 Pet. 1. 1. .2. You not'_anfvverir.1ga
Word for yourfelf 5 Anf. I did .wfwer..Rep.i Letthe Reader peru-fe the

. difPul_:e eiztileargei, and judge. . ‘ i '   e

: f5Q, Wh=y.‘do yougencourage urtleamed people to preach without
kfélfning, when-St. Peter faithgthac -inst. Paul: epiflzles are -fome things
hard to he underfioodswhich they,tha",t. be run-learned and unflable. wrelt,
35 I-ha)’ .d0.QthQrScriptures,.to-their. ownzdefirufiion .>An{. one tencourage
720216 topreacb m'cbout.g£fts.rRep.; Dzzvid.G';orgLee,. Sacjzms, and Haclaft of -13.265
the 1\7icolfiit4I9S3I1d.0-thcrr. ‘h€l‘CtiCl(S.:-Of.~QlCl-'1' had mzidently greater grf ts
thfifl any of ..you.~ B,ut'your. reply comes notneeb-my quefcion 3 a man
mayhaizerfome gifts,and no learning. ‘    V i

t 3 I. ..Was. it t-he-fpirit of truth or of errour, that made the Q'.1‘al»;ers
run 3_ft€,1*Hefi..D.4Uill,fl Tannenof rkirlzmarzd, almofi .a mile .( while he

‘ Was .w.al.1£ing;to:feehis grou_nd:);and teH'“ihirn?:'with'open‘ mouth, That

the .fPittit.of7God fem-themr‘to.tell him .17: man: feducewé ‘of the «p60Pl¢': 07%’
Qftlze carrupt.C‘lerg_y, Bic.  ’tis r-commohlyiknown he neither is,
1301‘ Was-aClergy man,nor preacher. Did ever the Spirit of God fend
5.111)’ 011 fuch ftivolous.erra11dsas thefe,‘ and thok mentioned p.; 4 5. of the

P€rf€3£ Pharifee? :Anf. -thou»zmd'tla; ;;é»;~¢:;;re;¢ 9259;. Rep.‘ »V7V1'tI1.t‘f5i H» r

Dtvi-lg.‘m:fi/‘rllidmfanandydivexzsiothersrmo'Ric:kn:anéz’. See other witiitefles
of thefe frivolous me’fTages;in 'the.perfe&PhariIee p. 45.  _Dzmfom

difpute with George White-bead.p.' 5.5. *  

5}» D0 ~.you.1’ti11.think it.an.-utianfweryable argument to prove the uni-
Yerhty man.an.Heretick,.becaufeliijiaagfs C who built Colleges and -

. Piia1ls,.gta_ve all their .oo\ds.~r’o..the -poorsaa ndftheir- bodies to be —~bur‘nt-)

W€1‘C:C0U€t0ltS.m£iZ?“ nfitlvatrvas neverntydrjqrzmérzt. Rep. Witneis.Edm.
~_?ynzes.Rz'c12. Wnight and ‘all that were prefent at the publick difpute
In Crznréviaige AUG‘. 24. . i A L

‘ _r 33. "Do you tfiink thatfCattan Ciaflzrad» ‘“.yvho=iha'r1ged7 himielfl or ~Hugh

Btséroun who committed buggery I\zvithv;a .M~aF€a or that _7ab22 Gilpizz-,
M70 Coxrfefled he was:about.to cut ;hiS.tl1I'-Oat, did {in or not fin in fo do-

   fingi

 

%%W%Wmv

INSPI RA TIO N 
   oI~i 3:HE V

 T S;  

.* "‘ 1. ‘
4-;  _  “
‘ 1-" 1 _ j ‘  z._ _
‘tn.-,5  .  _ 1" .8-a
- ' ' ' , '_4

-921‘) ..

 
 

;

3

w .2 . -Z"
X ~ «-9  I-'.~'o"€’-"‘
1 . -4.,‘

I <.‘

,

I

?

i

Printed by . C. and are  ggger ‘the Ndrth‘ ~
 Door of S.   Pzml§°Church. *
$99919? -

{    T 0 T H E
‘. u . _ -‘ _ : .'_ 4. . . ,‘ -’ V: I‘:  >‘,.- ( _ . .‘ .  _
  ' .»   .—*  ~-/  ' '  '

jamagaagammgaagagasaaaaaaaaamaamg    

I ¢ékfIé:X°¢¢°M¢°t~¢4~%~¥°¥°%°°W°*§~9=°I~4*¢~k»X°¢!~4~*1~'1b®=I~¢1~°b*¥°‘!>°¥°4~e¥~4>%¢1~ab    

f<‘z“¥_‘?E 
    R. E A D  R; “:;{§’*  
. ' '71 r
Reader, % g .   V ,
  xi; Ittle.;di_6l.4”}'W43’:ihflfik._227lJ?11.?,??;»difp:§te: bgtweeg
‘   %%%tb%e~vQga@rr*] and,‘ Mr-   3-’ bégcm at Cambridge,
“ btbdt  r1?0?il§l__fudci'éiz.l}‘I    this quefiioii
. (betlween. P gzpi fix     and Proteflzmty )A:V/Vhethelfi
  there be any ‘fdch::hing;in  world as’a~%P rbfefiant Clicrg
gy, . and%%confcquent1y. W1;1C§h§1f:a—fl§¥ _:1éue :Ghu.tch~, or zfaith, %
% or facrarncnts be to be hadout of th‘c% C%huLrch of Rome, 1 A
“  Irlazreagfltbdt tbofe who  Ndi/jmte%. at
Cambridgcj,  as‘ ]ittleforefefei_tI)Ti:r,% ¢3t‘§7)"ei~iKe€zere%nc1an+
  

“tw%e’e22‘ ‘lJ)»‘i;/¢ zzL7z%cT1%Si.MVV.:(wZt‘I9;t}}2>fe=o‘ti2er<Kom472i J‘ zévbo
F341-7/e% 2;w‘2rg't' Zzgainfl    TChi‘1fni‘ 

; Wait 163! and in; tbziédeb4te»VV»«h€tfi€I? LWCA  givtz as much
..Lc1reditin mgtttezi   _'o;f  Fathers (Sf

*the%%Gi*~€€1”<‘:;if:d l.a:tiri ;C’hfi:féh),‘ ”as'% tc>"°iJ2:'A'c5E)ut1try Yeomcn
on a jury‘, T/JeP'ro¢te§?zmt éfirnzing ‘”tbz'.r,' tbe Papifl idem’-

jigzg %B%ut%QAitfi.r‘;. a'2‘2c_zf',f()_A17;;t:-~c:pp¢an_}I5y _tlaefeI_tn2o fol-4.
°1amz’ng 21zfc_0mj/‘ex. Whaicb ~y o_zt bcztzze pzztieme to rectal, on"

r;$ill%ifim1tlmtMr. D4cn.j*(T%‘1'ij;4:ét‘e';zding to c/eflzfzcl the Q1_1a'kér 

 

  flzit/A); hot one wordin defeizfé of 21-22} S¢5¥, but only the down-  

r~igbtope11PapiFt\; .czml‘tl)zztf},'aeetrl) 1‘/96*v:e_ry'fci~}7ze zzjrgu-4

’§21;éé.;%zf'Lt.;j;,%_ 4:251 .tf e']‘zz}¢ze nzordsjzigdinfl Froteflzmty in general;

:2‘: the: Papzflm do i=n-their % rl4iLly-prlfiitéél’ /900%". 3  1   \
BM‘ lfwr ’6’ 

  

    for    ail      

-foftlae letter‘ to Mr iaemma the I M: zmd 1 ark: i’17iltg6J%lli::*l‘.,tf_ge  
erier. l e r I 

’Farevv"ell[9.nd beware ofwolvesin fheeps-clothinv. A

I- n
5- -1 -V _ ‘ . .
5’ Vi‘ ' ‘“*"'a——--:

 Memorable] Q4612/ertzlfenzent from Dorfétlliiife.

N Seftembéri 1-is iié5'?--ithetié-‘-i€*§3i‘a*flratige 'd"il’c’ove’r'y made‘ Ofd1i'?'ViI’/ZI?S._'
; ~ cf,-és in _and; neer §l.1€f.‘f1:é)Wl‘l>fOf:§-zsilferlzzfrfzc in-‘ '19Ja1fetfl9r2re, rtherebeing‘ nieeir
zoo. of them ait-zone meréfting, mofl __oft_l1en1 Quakeiis aiid A'naba’pti[is.Thpec
Men- and tvvoWonien_fo1~me’rly‘ Q1_1al<fers, eoimilitted to Dorcbefier Goale
Where 'the3z5ii$ow are pi‘ifoners, have confefled. upon their examination
a’.‘.€l*fi11<;¢ thcirxonnmicrncract  2f.“,11d"Y‘ Pérfons Qmualitr whe have vifircd
i . ‘ ‘I: That when th7e.=D‘evi?ll firfifappeaied ’to;{ land '3t‘empted them" to be-
come WitChess5He firlt of all perfw/'idc,d irhefn 5; IO Vfifloittzce tlveir Bapfitzfme
and no‘womder,becaufe in it cheymouma the-Dive! and all his warksawitb
izll tbefinfull lufis of 'th‘eflcjb :'9 which ‘tlleyidiel zdfizazlly T6’i¢0Zl}1C€ before they
made ;Lycont\r¢é?l1?itil9r7.~Yi"7-    o      ;.A.‘\ 1 ,_  e : l  l     . e -.
‘2.  Th.a‘t‘ftl_1e Devil did 46.ftI‘€I.1,_Vil_i‘lJly ’appear, to them in ryformeg(and
pcrfwadedethemas he eM2mb.' 4, ‘8, 9, 10.’:Li¥c.'4;.‘"5i'§‘6,'7;i8}’tempted am.
Saviour )to fall clewnand worjhip him, which théydid. , .
3. That he infligated them to torment, bewicch and defiroy as his and
-their greatefl enemy Mr. Lyford late Minifler_of’Sberburne, a learned,pio us
Orthodox, painfull Divine,’béingitormenteél ‘ wfifhla painfull and {harpe
difeafe of which -he dyedyg, and  .Bmfi¢-za his 4fl1C€Cfl'.OuI‘ a very godly
laborious Miniller, Whom they have forced by their Witchcrafts to deferc
v the Town. T .7  l A l
A 4. ‘The two Women con-fefs to all, ‘that the Divelrlmtla oft times bad A611,.
all copulation with them in fzmdry flazzpesgbut i_nol’_c commonly in the {hape of
Mr. L}fo”r;l?andMr. Bamfield,the Minifcers of ‘Sberlazzrngwhoni he and they
molt hated and en_dieavoured todefiroy. , "  .  ‘ t   t ' “
q 3. The Devil fince their imprifonmentv liathr~<f1'eqL1ently ‘appeared to
them all 5 and _a&u-ally polleffed them, bruifing, tearing like the unclean
S piric Mar. 49‘-Q38. to the 28. L110. 9.’ 39- 42. 84C» tofliag them frequently up 35
down tljetprifgz imz firrmge ma7mer,t;0rn1eI1ring them with fhfange fits of con.
vnllions, qual<ings,fhaki11gsiin all their joynts,andy fwcllings in their whole
,bodies,th'at their skins are ready toiéreak, which makes them cry out and
roar with great horror, as divers t’_}’6’°'Wlti1€_[_T€.$ of quality atteéi. And if in-
credulous Mr. Demze, orany other (makers doubt the truth of it, if they
ii 1" '‘””'"”'“°°‘‘’i'i‘'‘‘‘‘‘‘‘*‘’'‘‘“'”‘-"‘7‘—A-~~-r«l1e.v vsiil enforéed to confefs it, and

f\A4___.——

     

       

J. .."r
<.v\'.‘:"' 
i “:3

~_ 4
9.

)-

 ,» amswaz'.eme.-~=2:m:ammm2aaem

To Mr. N. DJENNE. i

'  His day I met with 3 decree of the Pope, co11d¢mning
the late Apology for the jefuits ( which was printed in
ahfwer to   Montziltfs myfferyx of Jefuitifme) and
_, , _ threatning all who dare read or keep it; but withall
xx‘  ‘ I met with a new Apology. for the fame perfons with
your name prefixed. W herein vmndring to find feve-
ralafperfions call upon fundry of the Jefuites adverfaries( among the
re/it upon Mr. T/pa. Smith )1 refolved to {pend an h our or two in vindica-F
ting them and the C_bnrcb qf England; which  infavour to the flouri{h-
ing Rd01{1'1fl'l Miifrzfs and ialovlaftryy) you think  t0 Call their fading Mifirifs
audio. " A i r
2. And here ifl {houldiinitate you, ‘I {hould fuperfcribe this, To 712}
frz'vo.lo_}zs and learned friend, H.  iMT- Of Art: andfeniar Sopb. Captain and
‘Apothecary, farmer and Minifler, tbelrjeverend Apologifi for__tbe Society of
fefue. But counting’ it no virtue £0 1,I111¢3§¢yyous m:thIs1lt_ind_.,r llhall
only take notice”offuch’pa[i'ages ‘as may appear tofome weak people to
be pertinent. i    . _    _ e i f_.  ‘
— 3. In the firfi page, you tell us that the Tinker mendeth fouless
though you can not but know if you have read over that book which you

  

pretend to anfwer (which I much doubt )'that this Tinker p.’ 197.1. 21.

of his book entituled Law» and ,Gofpel,. advifcth. his convert in thefe words
seem: to Chris‘? even as filth) as‘ ever than can}? : thatiis (‘if"I'underl}a.nd Eu-
gliih )wben yyaurbavet [worn a vain-(mtb and muldgyo. to prayer for [urine of
‘ that fin, firs‘? flab your Father, then paifonjour 'Mbtber, flie ivitbjaur fifler :
‘mid then go confidently to Church, but not before. If Mr. D. have read this
or thofe other firange paifages, of this T’s. jermon mentioned in the Q154-
ker difizrmed, or ( ifhe’l not believejthat relation ) if he’l credit his own
eyes,and fee What the fame “ Tinker faith againfi ChriI’c’s oration ( Mama.
35. 42. ) and againfl the neceflity of good Works p. 65. 66. 99. 100. 101.
151. 304.. 31 1 .methinl<s he {hould not fay this Tinker mendsfimlers unlefs
he mean that he mendeth themjufl as he mends kettles, that is, flopping
one hole and making many. « % 3
4.. In the next place H. D, blames Mr.'S. for proving that none may preach
1mlefs—tbe_ybe font, wben( quoth he ) ' the ‘T. is of we fame mind. lanfwer
that the T.did deny it, till Mr. 5. had proved it; or at lcafi be bid him
prove it. And Mr. S. was perfwaded.( and {till is)that Mr. E. to whom
* A V L that

ns nae» zzargzp“  it j",

++m»+4~+€++«t»~:»+4«++4nm»+->¢.e2»»zs++++~:»+++o«+4»

1 t itce W   i4-}¢n;§@€;“?6’:I¥4‘r.*Den§‘s.iTf7#\
U3 9 1' 39 WW: 1 not elieve the necefft f «~ V
‘ 5.fWhe1£:ea§_ you sirvottlelifain invalidate‘ Mr1;ySn?itbin§r?i?:gE_9n‘ ,
may “W0 er   lm °“ due by HP-iiHiaz[l5 and‘ then WI Ion’ yo“
. len  have an -..,, M,

fwerd Maflm dc minilierio Anglicam D °
- 3 r. F em agalnfl Cbgmpm, . .
J3 and th".\»\,~._

vindications of our Reformation and Orde '
e rs wh1ch are Writ b
~‘ Y Bp-Brzzm- »

7”” and Dr'He3’[£”’ ,‘iSiVerYiP1"°bab1eY0ll fhall receive M S h
11 . is de-

termination of *our uefiions. «' » .
Vouchfafed to 1-gad thgt fmal boolirvhlhighlcnorlzm Zho (tihmks you have not
magfiieriaily to cenfure, can not believe t}hat P10 tsinfi to ailfwer 85 Profefs
determinations of fuch <1uefiions.And he hathynolt f nd lelfure to rfzad hi‘-
you, to write and print books -only for" his own*'i C19 much {Pater ‘"119 as
6. Mean while I rnufi't‘e'1l you’, that(one“reaforca mg.’   
not read over the Qgaker difarmed, is becaufci Sn Zvhy   Yqu have
gushes in your .4r‘h- P386; Which are anflwerde inythe lput a Cafe and three
etfor your moreabundant fatisfaaiion lie ant’ fitter to MI‘. E ,5- 25...
ly‘; by aflerting. I. That in your cafe the Pre-at? Ulfitn mo;-e Pal.ticu1a‘r_
‘men to pagans is no fin.‘ e2l3y... That in fuch exfl: "‘d‘e,¥ Of tho“ a1iPVrVraCkc
fullfor fuchea Congregation to'choofe'- their T a9 nlrflilry cafes ’¢iS ]aW_
Congregation may find fitting men full of f ‘EEC em.‘ 31),‘ ‘That fuch a
‘iievers 5 iefpecially if the fhiywrackz men hare“ ‘ ’ t.° Breach Unto unbieg
“"9 to the Ch“”3ha' I0 Ordeih them 3 ‘as F mm: “'0 uric.’ as ‘G011 38 the
are mentionedjii the nlettii-:1.‘ to —Mr_eE_i af‘0re_acitc?di"“ ?"‘d 11§¢'6fiz¢: did Whoa
37- But‘ H. D; mun?‘ iiive ifieieavé io‘~té1l‘h’i  id, 3 ” : M  
'm1nd.;whobc‘in’g 4g§§.1j%O'1¢dfei.d.%.. ~vf£~$~?%=;tA~tI?*a:ten’a’1 hath an in
place, and taheszto hinrfelf what yortioxi oi? thleetiraitfff hgaffers 0;; ‘E5103
eriy becaufe a%}'efl’e1lfl.11pwrackcis fometinies ithoilgitta [;.£r]eZf‘i5 5 111654-
~ «- ..tu,A,PI‘C.Y 

thea.peopl"e on“tfie' Ihore '”An:d'I" ve d” ~ ! . ~ u 4  
from _on%e»that'p.1fé~tends'to'beaMi‘ni){i]erfloft}:31a: ‘£6? Words fl1011‘1d come
_nn;P1ey_¥hiat »h'§i1;a;h a.1f1cager'n1ind'cbefhipvirack 9 “’a"°-'3 Pmlefs he ‘would_
.fa41]¢_------- a    :2  1::  _:  g i 1 «   311 entzrc veifellilundér
F i 8.: iWhereasin‘;your‘5i*fhi ‘yang D ' A   T K» a  ‘X  ’

- .   ‘ % »-   - a you fallf I   ‘  »_~ 4

WV.h}Q93k€1‘$—5 youmufi knoiv, that thocilc: uP°“?“."5° “fr dlfputinv
challenge h’1mand.ai1’1 the Clerpy 1,13% 1 ,d¥°'"‘.. m'?“d.3 did no ii 3%
,iin‘}f°1iA”.P--T9.'P1‘ffaCe )'but fetzpi tljéi  Olf31aPi1'111C..( G» FM: in fler
“rpeenqenmemgind School d’oox:’s5;:‘§ Nayaiihg  a;a,d=’fia.n9e }.Iyon_.th¢ $03.3
‘Qgjakers were irnpo_;*’tut1‘ate*sivitih§1\(/Ir‘;"3>;“f(;derlqg  311d“ di~vcrn5t'§,thq.
foreltheonfet r'e't’o'l<ved‘toideblineiit5 "d-‘i ‘P.u.t~en-1131fa.n houf bf-
*werefl2z'nfc21ent-becdufe no m2znmec‘ld[ecZ -C21’ £91‘ he had oft raid that }1,,e,
.th“S( “.3 MP‘ ‘.“".6’5 Alden‘ and manyw:¢1,t}"7”’*i  the cafe fianding
fl)’ fee t)‘rotnr;_‘cfi‘e_tcr-minacion. gand gmat‘  ..¢g‘5 °a“W_l_tI1efs )_Iwou1d glad-
IW‘ho.fa1ch’nS%th¢_duty dfggmillffimg:n°t¥9l11:;_ave :9 fay._aga;,,fi ‘S2 Pk” 13
‘5“"?““5’€*‘?a'Ti’4ii-  ‘ e      =°">' ‘-9 ?==:119rit"ia were amfm

C only

9.‘ For

   

 

i . _ trim-Pép13(Li‘ 

  For the argument three hees re¢fp;2.Mr§ IS. did not‘ fay, that thi s

was the only way of proof, but‘thati’it was one ;Hedid not fay, that all

three hce’.s be three perfons,biut‘thatall hees which be in Heaven are
fuch. Youmay fee they werethcn {'pea‘king‘of the three that bear re-

cord in Heaven 3 andl hope Mr. H, D. will liable nonepof his _troop_- l2or- I

1]}: in Heaven though they comei11to2l’:;i11lsi.;‘ t r y ; I 1 ,
‘ 10. In your 2d. sf. you would ‘clear’ G. W’. from being’ a Papifl beca‘ufe
you fay he would take no oath. flu]: Others think that he will take an

oath when .’tis for his advantage, as you may fee in the queries 5 and if

  that be true ( as Mr.rS. hath reafon to believe it) I know no reafon wh y

he fhould refufe the oath, unlefs hebe a Papili; Nor would Mr. S’,

J believehave mentioned that oath tophimg iflie had not been .afl"ured that
‘lg’. W .‘ and H ; D. are both alpike bitter er1epmi¢sytoi“;thel o.ld_n1odera,te 'Wt.ay‘
foftryali. appointed by the Church" ofE1¢gltlnc’¢' ii and if you be Co, I am

yet to learn what other way, befide this oath; he could have pro-
pounded. A  

.1 I. To y.o11i".3}l.3§._iwher€lyol1 aslfi who can 71j¢dl{_'€]"L’-I1fc"0f:tl.7c',f.1l6}‘] ;6f; the

twelve E»§mri:;laz2r’:; Iianfiiveir any Ifiall but ‘Mr.}D. who is unwillling. To

' the reff of this 3?. befides‘ _ what you have b.c€,I1g3:0,ld before 2.’ 1.124,. ] I

reply,that though the Father‘ Son and ‘H. ‘Ghofil arefone eflence‘, and
each of thefe three is everywhere‘; )’€.t that they may nianifcii the di-
flinfiionofperfons , one having condefcendedto an incarnation whofe
human nature there appeared, [the other two .didfat his’ ;baptir,fn1e manifeft
themfelves by fenfible‘ fymbols. Whichgrthree’ fferifiblrei manifeflatioiis

  Almighty God was‘ pleafed then to make unto‘ nierisgfenfes. in tliree difliiifi

places( though each of the three perfonsibe in ‘all’ places ) that we who
are in divers places might have fome apprehenfion of the diflinét per-pp
fonalities. I I I . _ 7 V I   r I .- A a
12. In your 4tlT.§. you tell MI‘-fsmithpf Lurberfialvi’n,Zui}zglius(asthe
Romaniffs are wont. ) As ifall thofe whb proteff agrainfl the ,_Church of
‘Rome for pr~ctending‘t'o z‘r2faz‘llz‘l>‘;'[‘¢}, were thereupon neciefliitiily obliged
to place the fame infalibility in every Protefiant Doftor. And whereas
you ought (if you wouldifay any thing pertinently ) to ‘prove what the
Protcflzrnts of thechureh of England anfwered, you tell us what thePxz--
pin‘: in other Nations obje&; whether truelyrtor not Ilhall-not now fiand

, to examine.

13. "Butl am glad to meet with a man that hathiread ALL I; the books of
'Papz‘s‘7s in tbofe times, and ALL their Hifiories. I hope you would not cite
them all as filled with matter» for your purpofe, unleffe you hadread them

A all : I entreat you to cite not all ofthem (though the more the merrier )

but only one,if youacan,in all your vafl hifiorical readings(I ‘fay one Pro-
tefiant ofthofe many thoufands that have defended the Church -of Eng-

land ) who hath made fuch au_EnthufiaPcical anfwer as that of G. 11/. I

14.. In your 5th‘, 5?. you fondly imagine T. S. pfiark mute divers times;
a 2 a

y :41: _A7sfwer to Mr. Denns l
As firll, upon your faying‘ that tbefirfi Protefiant B2:/hop: bad na ordination;
but what the} mutually gave tbemfelve: and one anotber. Aafl If you mean by‘
mutually ( as common fenfe requires) that the Ordained did ordain the
Ordainer Bifhop, I befeech you to prove it : for ’tis as falfe,as °tis evidently
known thatthefour Bilhops-Ordeiners were Bifhops’ before the beginning

  ofQ Elizabeth: reign; of which time onely you make this queliion and

kers dayes.

fcru le. _
15P.‘}Secondly, you fancy T. S. mute again upon your asking who gave
them commillion to make Mat/5. Parker Arch-bilhop of Canterbury. Anf.
The Bilhops in King Edward Vl’s. _time didgive them power and fo com-
million (for all Bifhops have cemmifliaa when fit occafion and due circum-

ilances occur) to make Mat". Parker Bifhopz and I doubt not but Mr. Smitb ,

( as mute as you cottceivi: him," and impertinent in Manul'cr'ipts‘ ) is both
able and ready to’ {how you in his own private library ( befides what he
hathin the publick  fome antient'records,« wherein you’l find it evident
that Mat. Parker was a true Bifhop ; if you think there can any evidence
arife from the teliimony ofa pCCYill1'_:i§dVCr{ary, who lived in Matthew Par-

16. Prefently you add that .   niolt profeftapealjr that they recei 11-  

ed their commifllan from Popgifla ‘Biz:/hops of K. Henry VIII’s time. /Injl true 5

becanfe he dares uotlfpeaka falfity: for they received it in the time of
lEa'w. VI. Though what you fuppo_fe had] been no impofhble thing, fivlcfi

‘ ( as all men d as ackiiolavlefdgj in H ear} the ‘ei'g_hts reigii.

‘goodProteflants in the’da‘ye_s‘ofi‘Ez£:v;VI,‘had ireceivjed valid baptifine

17. In mower tothe men‘ If tl1isi;§.i'bepleafedito know’ that the antient

. \

Church believed (‘contrary to your Popilh novelty) that all Bilhops had

‘fpiritual jurifdiftion, as being ftlcceflors to the Apollles; And ’:is only

the interefi ofthePope_ to.deny.it.: _whois wont to_ make titular Bilhops

f witbaut jririfdi€’tion', to Ifiérvie lhimfelfin‘ his pretended cmmcils,‘ .1

18. I hope I 11eed:inot‘tell..Mr. D. (who tells others 53. 15. how 219;»;

fleck at Cambridge )that a Mailer and a Family, an overfeer and a charge

arerelata, rife andfalltogetherl: but I mull tell him that Biflhop Barlaw
and "Miles Caverdale had the warrant ofall their Ecclefiaflical Superiors
 who then werelolver them  to make l Bifhops in the diocefs of London
and that Boaner wasnot theirfilperior.‘  - ' v ‘ " "   ‘ _ l I

  .19. To what you {peaks at large of (Ll Elizalaetkt ‘being a Lay-perfon
and not being able to give any power, Ste‘. 1 anlwer; What power that
Queen had, and ought to have in Ecclefiaflical matters you may fee in
the Articles of the Church of England :' which no Papifi nor Anabaptift ( H.
D. or W.  W. or H. D. ) was ever able to difprove, or durfi ‘fay one

“ Word againfi it.   A T 3 -
’ ao. ' Reading forward I am at a fiand, and mull plainly confefle I know

notwhat you mean by what followes, viz. your comparing the common

13601916, and Mailers of Families with the gzqeens. that then was‘. I know

1105

Quaker‘ no Papzfl.  

not what. your afferting that tbefe have as mue/opower as the Queen can

drive at, but.caPting off all authority 5 like your brethren at Mam/fer.‘
21%. To your 6th.. 55. I anfwer that if there be any Churches beyond
our feas, who count it their glory to want a fucceflioa of Bzjhops, yea to cry
flzame upon its and to rejeéi itae afuperflitiom reliqae of Paper} , and markof‘
Antz'cbrz'§?,we are no more engaged to defend fuch people, then the Qua-
ker is engaged to defend the Papifi, or the Papifi a Quaker 5 nor fo much,
as appears by this Apology which I am now anfwering. ‘   e
22. This I,l<no-W that not only the Reformed Churches- in their Con-
feflion ofAus'I2urg, and again in their Apology for that Confellion ( cap. de.
ordine erolefi a_/iico, 6*‘ cap. olepoteflate ecclef. ) and in their other colloquies.
at Warmer and Ratisbon, and diverse of their b00l<S btfidci but likewife
Mr. Calvin ( who {ubfcribcd the Augufiane confellion in his book do
zteceflitate reformanda ecclefia to Cardinal Sadolet his old friend, and
in his epifiles to Archbilhop Cranmer and Bifhop Ridlqy, and in his Infii-s
tution: 1.4.. C. 4. 5&4. And with him Mr. Beza too inhis book ale diver-
fis gradibur Mini/fr. c. 21. . 23.1 fay gknowfiand amasfure as a man that
believes his eyes can be} that athefe and Zane/3},‘ Diodari, Cappellm, Pet.
Moz4[in5Dai[/é, and othersthe mofii learned F rench-mennow living believe
epifcopacy and the government by Bifhops to be [arrfull at leafl. And I
am fure that Mr. T, S. if H. D. be [0 well acquainted with him as he pore;
' tends (burl am told he confefled he did not know, him fo much_ as by
fight,the fame hour that he owned this printed book to him) will at his
requefi give him a larger lifi of reformed forraign Divines on this fubj cét,
and protfss that other proteflant churches befide the Englzfla havea fuccef;
{lion of Bi[hops,whichl {aw in his chainber.- But there is {o much already
printed of the,’L. Vifcount Falklands, Bp-g Carletoiziandiotliers againfi your
ungtounded afiertion, that Itlhalldeferr fending you a largei~catalog.u_e
until‘ you (or your friend Knot the jefuit, who alfoihath writ ag"ain?t Eph-
fcopacy) {hall haveanfwered ‘Dr. Hamands ..d2rflc’?§tat_z'on$ againfi Bloadeli,
otherwife than by your fvtordiand feqgueftration. s .f ,  g i  “
~ 23. Your 7”‘. 55.‘ conteining no.tliing_to the purpofe but abare aHe_rtion
that [T S. §. 16. and :] great numbers were of Epifcopall men, PRESBTTE.-

'R1~4N5‘aIH.de]7enderzts, and ALL profrflors befzdes Papiiis, do refufl: to take ‘

the‘ oath i/If 41>}-z_¢ra'tz'on_,$ is in -my opinion anfwereil fLlfllCiCl1tly,‘ till it be

provedg, by a bare negatioiig Though {omen.o’f.then1:have much more caufe n
to refufe it than you; i whoihave taken away the former trial of.Pope;-yp g

-viz. Recufancy; "comm-on.by'the Law to Pagifls, Anabaptifis and other
Sefiaries: which names] hope you’l not be angry at,while you take tliem
tooyourefelf. p. 16. l. 14.. 16. - ~ e - by , , f '
L 24. In your 8th. §. you argue againfi the oath thus-, : No man can fafe-.1]
fwear that be belie:/.es,gno purgatory, mtlefl? be be asfure tba-t.gtbere.i5 ‘no purgg-

tar}: as tbattbere is a God. './Inf. This ‘looks like the faying of Fa. Knot 21- ~

gaiuli Cbillingwortb, who thinks that what ever he believes in religion he
believes

1 F .'_/inf Aafrveij-ta‘)!/In Denifs P   Piaf

ibefieaves with the fame certaihty; "W‘he'riewith' fe receives the highelt arti.

acles of the Chrii‘tian faith. VVhen paflion and prejudice is laid halide, nI'
’ hope you’l find time to confider whether if you were now difputing in ‘ the

Divinity Schools you might not fafely affirm thatftobe true which is
your épirzion in any matter offieligion, and not expeét that any Caviller
who fiandsby  and is no way concerned inthe Aét ) {hould thence inferr
and cry out that j on are zzrfzzre of it as that there 1}: zz God who ma’a."e t/aer;wo rlal.

if this Cavailler {hould go further, fingle this 'alfCI‘CiOI.1 C pe-rhapsi Being‘

only argzmzentum ad bominem )out of your whole difpute a11d.prz'nt a book
againft it, would not hebe(as youfay Mr.S. is )not a little ridiculous?
And would not you your felf~take as little notice of him as Mr. Smith
doth ofyon? I fliouldenlarge upon thig your acceprion ofthe word be-
I'z'eve,but that Mr. CbilZingwo"rt£rhathfaid enough of it in his anfwer to’
your BrotherKnot, and T. S. iuhis defcnfeofC£-illingwortb. ’   t

25. Inthe lafi lines of this 12th. page you have thefe words, w/mt do
I know whether purgatory be revealed in Scripture or no ? You fecm here‘
plainly to profefs that you do not know “whether Papifis or P1°otefia1Its
beinthe right, {'0 far as to ‘Gods revelation in v Scripture; which PVO-.<
teflmzts have alwaycs made tl1eir‘r;z2[e; By which we may judge whata
Proteliaiittyouare, And that Anabaptifis either deny the  Scripture

to be their rule, or affirm that they know no ‘error in purgatory.

26. Tothe 9th. ;§. whereof I can fcarcetmaketconimon fence,I might: .

‘tell you that I’10.JPdTlid.777C”tiS;i¥1'any' fenfe tha‘t‘which is {iguified e by the
word perfonlB‘ut1i:rat;h‘er anfweirtthiatno Pafrl‘i‘anIent can free any perfon
from aiiylfoathf ofbeliefe ‘Wli‘iCh‘he hath ‘t’al{en“§ Fort example, if one
Parlianrentpropotind an oath to me to declarewhiether I tliink the Arti-i
lclestof the Cotmcill of Trent be.(f)rthodox and ‘Catholick, and I {wear
no 5 from this oath ten thoufand Parliaments can never abfolvc me, If 1
fwear in truth I need no Abfolutio_n:but‘if I‘ therein forfwear my fclf, the
Pa1‘liame1it can notfree me from p‘er}u’ry,t nor ‘remit the guilt of it. The
matterof this oath was Concerningbelief, an_dI never yet heard or read,
that any Parliament in England did afiilme power of fetting men at
liberty from beleiving what they believe in matter of Religion. I grant
that an A8! of Parliament may be repealed by a Parliament and fo the
‘raw of exaéting this loath may be abrogated, but that an oath taken
Concerning matter'oFbeleif"or not belief can be voided by any Pow-
lreron earth, is the do&rin‘ei-not of any’Englilh Parliament, but only ' of
the Conclave at Korea : therefore( good Mr. Denna) creep not under‘ the

wing of an Englifh Parliament, but confefli: your Argument to be a na-

‘ked weapon ofa-Romifh Jefuite. , —

_ 27. To your Ioth. 5S. 1, anfwer briefly, that ’tis notto be imagined any
*Eng‘lifh Parliament hath or will forbid tllc-fflbjifiat of any Prince to‘ ac-
‘limovvledg that civiilltfubjefiion which is due‘ to his Soveraign, fo long
ashleremainets iinhisdominions. ‘ ‘ ‘ “ '

P ‘ 25. In

      

235, ‘I1'g_yOl11fHI Ith and-12th Seétions yoi?'mal<e the oath of abjitiration to»

beboth a prelaticall and l?_1‘esbyteci_a11 wdcfiglti pre/zzticzzll men mutt be
fun, to pay for all ) but Whereas you'”t‘e'll ‘me divers times of Preletical‘
malice, and tbrlt the Papijtslflnivcrfelly dzfowze that Tenet W/aic/a~z's olvjeeicd to
them as.tbez'rs5 2:iz.T_/mtfaitbhis, notito 1>ekept=wz'tb Hereticlgsgl fhallnot infiit
upon the LatCra_nfCOuflC€l_( which dCCri€_C(l zmno. 1216.ca‘2'z. 30. that the

Pope hath power to abfolve fubjefizs fromitheir obediencejwhich is one of.‘

thofe Synods to which Bellzzrmirz faith all that are Catholicks mufi (uh,
mitsbut I reply,that What you fay here“iS nothing to the piirpofefor M r. S.

never laid othcrvsr.if¢,f0r_(in the. I6th.pa..ge_ Qfthis preface to, Daz'Z[e’s Apo[e- h
T gyforhtbe Reformed Cburclaes )he profef_Teth' fo much liincliiefs to tliePtoma-

nifi in this particula"r,f that I~havexhea.x*‘d him if cenfilred bytfome of them
as talking there like an inrzmorato. B11t._methinks'both they and you in-
Read of cenfuring him and bringing new atgtlmeiits, fhould anfwer that.
which he printed therein above fix years fince 5’ efpecially when he there

1 doth very earnefily Lefeecbrtheni toiianfwet it, Vprofefliilg that‘ he had been
, many years trot15.[cfei'Witl1it'..1. - The argutnent is this, That which one or
. two(_ or fome few)Roinan Do&-ors fay‘ «is lawfull, may ‘(in the judg-

ment of Papifls ) be done without danger of mom{:a»l~fini [the Major is Mr.

tKrzots dozzritj maiittaineel Cs 4- S9 25. as alfo Valentin ,. V afqaez., Leflius, Enri-
_.qu€5a5¢a.C,€llot de Hierarcbia 1.8. C‘. 16. p. 714.. ] But not only one, but

ny Rionfa-n Dofiors fay, ’tis lawfull to murder or depofea fnprenie

. Magifirate that is guilty of _ herefie or f__tifp_e€’ced"of} lit, ”'C';_z2;ejt’é §pr‘z‘H'cipeg.;
_conc,lufio_nem. The minor is fufficiently proved obhiyh_Dr. fer.‘ Taylor’; fer-
mon on the piowdertreafoii p.i5o.iand 51. and in a {mall ‘trail: intitixled.

Romijb pofitiorzs for rebellion‘ colle&ed by  Morton: landZlrIr.i'f4x2ey’s
reafons why he could not be a Romaanift ( as be much dflfi-.1‘CCl.) and a gdod

_fu];jeaE_ to his Soveraign at one time.

29." Reading’tother day Sleiclazzzsi relation of your friends affairsat
Muu&«er.,I.n1et with this patfagc, that there was (i 1412 made at the cam-

:ceI:vafiiCo}zjt'a}zce that promife   fl7bulc1'm_)t lze kept with H‘efretz'cI;s,' or tbofe that

Izefufpeéied for Hereticlgs, tbeugb they came re the S We upon the pzzblickfaitb
oftbe Emperozir for the bexringof their czzu]'e'.Sleicizz}z_i,[. 3. ad rm. 1.5 2.1, mibi.

_ p.;5_.9. edit; Francf. 8°, '

go. You whoPretendtosl<illin:z[[Popi{h hif’cories cafinot but know,

.f0h737¢o H115 hid €_h.C. En1pcr0ux' Sigifmunds fafe C0l1dl_l€_t’..lI‘l "as -large
__termes as might be exprefled, grxzt"é’fzAzfi:z'pere,i fgworgibiliter traé?a_re---om- L
eenjque prorfm impedimento remote trzmfire, §3‘are_.,morzz-rz", efiw redire liberé per-

mittatis, fzbz'queI[_Hu_fl'o] «Erfuis, dam opuefuerit de [ecure 6" fzzlva ve[z‘tz's' Z9"
.z1eI2e_zhzti3proz/idere cona5ud7u,.._rzd bmorem (9) .Kez2ererztz'/am 71-9/i'?"¢£" Kegzle Ma-

” je§1atz‘:.hA.I1dnotwithfiandingthis he was bmfizta which quellionlefs the

Emp. would not have fulffertedgbut ‘either in obedience to the e command of i

‘the conncel, orupon that Councels perfwading him that he was not to
‘kecpprormfe withaman whom they hacldcclared an. heretick: aman

who

g. '12: Anfwer to r. n —

who ate! incemlium quafi ad epatks pro erxzvit, rlingufi jreterzs efitmundioris
vine opinionoe alarm, as Eneas Sjlvimj afterwards Pope . Pin; the 24.) Hzf/f.
Bahem. e. 35. 36. a man whofe rare endowments Poghius the.Florentz'ne
hiliorian and Orator an eye-witnefs of his triall at the Cyouncel of Con-
fiance admired 3‘ faying mfhiil zmquam protulit imlignum hone wire 5 ut ff

 

id infine fmtiehat quad verhis profitehatur nulltz in eum nedum" mor-

tis czzufst invenirijzzfia pagan. 0 virum dignum memoriii homz'rtumfempz'ter-
223 I epiji. Poghii ad Lenard. Aretin. in fafric. rerum expat. t’9"fzzg. p. 153.
which pallagesl cite, lefi you lhould obje& Campians retraéius ex fugfi,
or any fuch. frivolous yretence. T ‘

*3/1 . In fumme, fince you impertinently afii rm that the‘ Papifis univer-

jall} difown that Tenet, that faith is nosto be ‘kept with Hereticks 3 me-
  thinks ’tis fit you lhould prove that they univerfally difown the Councel

or Conflance, ( whichis one of Bellarnzines 17. ) unlefs you are fo far
jefuited as that you;.reTje& that councell, becaufe it ejefted two Popes.
32. Mr. S. never yet {aid that Papifis ought not to be permited to im-
“prove their eliates, nor that there are not fome Papifts who abhorre
breaking their promife  and therefore while Mr. ’D_ tall-(csnto thg con-

. ‘trary he fights withhis lhadowi) ‘but you Lhalldo well to prove that no

Papifls can take adv_ant ge from the decree of the Councel of Cont-iance

. to break their promifes made to Protefiants. And} cannot but take notice,
how much the Papifis are beholden to Mr. Denna, for telling the World a

very plainly that they may finde every jot as much hams‘? proceelling :md'tf're-
edit in Papills as in ,Prot.e]_l4nt:. _p. 1'5. l. Tpenult. _ ’ ‘ v
33. A few lines after having told us that the Presbyterian: are eafily e-
fiougl) infefled niitbfucb [ea:ye;¢( prelaticall m2.liC€  he falls into thefe
words, ,Nor do the}, while they fall thus upon others, take any rtotzce of, or in-

  

dezwour to anfwer,thofe things which arefhznding olzjeéiiorgs again]? themfelvess o

to wzt in relation to their rel>ellz'on, dijbhedience and xzpojhzcy from the govern-
ment of the chfzrch efRo1ne5 which in good egzrm-{'1 l i think tleq will never be

_ able to anfwer, z/pen their Own principles. Anf. ‘ Obferve how this man

( though he called himfelf Anabaptifi and S eétary but two or three lines
‘before thefe words ) now foon forgets what perfon hehad afliuned, pulls

ofi" his Vizard, and appears a bare faced Romanifl. Obferve how he who ‘

profeffes to teach men to-be d’1('obedient and rebellious to all Bi{hop’s,palli-
onately and haflily takes part with him, who hath ufitrped upon

all Bilhops in the Chriflian world : and rather then loofe hisdcfign, cal- g

leth all whonow profeffe not to obey the Churchof PtomeRebells,'Dif-
obedient, and Apoflates from Her Government ( fure the can not in good
earneli fuppofe them to be difobediengunlefs in good earncft he- bclieffc
they owe her obedience.) ‘Then judge what a foul {lander this is in Mr-

D. to blame proteflants for their not endeavouring to a-nfwer thofe things .

which have been anfwered an hundred times by Bifhops unanfwerably 5
Judge what acrime it is for one who calls himfelf a Proteflant to 0b}_¢&
‘ ' “ —aga1

5 .a,n‘.;:  mat. .

againfcthis and all other reformed Churches, the molt bittericalumniesei

that the molt extreani rigid peeviih Papifls have devif ed. .
 4. You goe on thus; fuppofing tlaeir ordination for wbicb -tloej “fa znucb

‘contend to be ofneceflity and of Divine right, and tbat tbe} bad it from the

Church of Rome, as mofl certainly they had. Anf. Here you feem to con-
tradict whatyou laid in the 6th. ,6. (p. 9. l. 33. ) in thefe words, nor

. could be in trutb aflirm it. But if you mean by thefe ‘words lalt cited out

of-the 12th. 53.. ( as they feem to import ) that you elieem our ordination
to be ofdivine right becaufe it came in fucceflion from the Church of
Rome,’tis a wide mifiake. In fumm, methinks you declare here openly in
this paragraph that all who are baptized and ordained by any oftbe Church of
Rome (as ltis certain a great part of this nation was, even in the time
ofGregorz'm M. ) do tberefore nowandfhallfor all future age’: owe obedience
to the Pope of Ron e'3'or elfe the) are all Rebells and Ape/fates. Whereas we
are not more Q)3€(3ll1CCl by thofe who were ord ained by others from the
Church oTPCome,then Mr. Donne himfelf was baptized by the hand of

' one of thofe who was baptized from othersrthat. were heretofore Romifh

Prielis; fo that our Ordinatjioneisfueely’ as divine as his baptifme. As
for his being? rebaptized,‘ both the Church of Ronle(for whom he pleads )
and we and all the Chriflian World account him,for that, at Rebcll and A-1
pol’tatefrom the [Inivcrfall Church. o ' i 7

35. But becaufe he {ayes in good earnefi he believes it can never. be
anfwered upon our principles, he {hall receive his anfwer in-thefe three
lines following, challenging both the jefuites and ‘Anabaptilis Mr. H. D.
and N. N. to anfwer it afthey can: '  a . ~ . s

The Anfwer 13.: tbir.

36. The popes ofthe Church of Rome dare not deny themfelves to
have l‘€C€lVCd Ordination from the Church of ferufalemg notwithfiand-
ing this they profefle that they owe no fubjefiion to the'Bifl10p Offeru‘
falem: Therefore it Was(not prelaticall, but ) Anabaptiffzfcal 5 malice-‘t0
tell all Bifhops that have been ordained from Rome they are Apoftatesand
Rebcls from the Church of Rome in good earned} if they ( avouching,or-
'difl‘1ti0f1 fI‘0m the Clergy to be of necellityand‘ Divine right do noto-
beythe Pope. = l T a ' n - e « ~ ~
- 37. That Whichfollowes in your books about Mr.G.8£Mr.P.who difputed
againfl the Romanlfls(ai fa& vvhich I believe Mr.Hen. Denna never W25 ne-
ver will be guilty of ) al_l that know thofe Minillers ‘know to be fupcrfl-u-
ous and frivolous. However I to whom ou (in defenfe of the Q_uakers

.very pertinéntly do objeét this) thin lit to tell you; that whereas the ,

Romanifi took a longer ‘time only to put forth an edition of that,» which
if he had dealt truely was all before done to his hand; whereas heihath
alfo fo changed, tranfpofed, added, diminiflft and made ofit Whathc

B is ..na,y

T422,  ia>*/W'k:r.1?enn’s
llpt‘, that I believe it will be as Toon ‘owned for your(I mean.net  S. ‘but
H. D’s.)confe_rence as Mr. Pearfons or Mr. Guzzningsg I nnlfi now tell y0U*
further ( what you have been oft enough told) that that relation can-
not expefi to be regarded by Mr. P. or any fober perfon which is fdi['clam-
ed and difowned by three ofthe four who were difptltants, viz. by b0Ch'

, 1

the Proteflants and half the Papills. p ; . . p

38. But ‘chieflycl muff entreat you to confider whether the inferting of
above zoo. lines at a time as part of the conference which never was part’
‘ofit (befides all profeifed additions) 2ly,e Whether the leaving out wh01¢‘
fheets of the Protefiantsnvhich the Papifis thought too hard to anfwers
and'3ly. the fcarce fuffering any ‘one argument and anfwer of both to
come .together ( but cafling ufually parts of the fame paper of Mr. G. ma-
ny fcore leaves afunder one from the other be not a fcandal that any
Chriflian would defire might be covered with filence. And I would glad-
ly know from any ingenuous perfon, Whether this might not be anf W61‘

enough to a book put out at the charge of the Romanifis own purfe and’

confcience; adifcourfe by being mangled rendred for unintelligible ,that
1' carce any man ever read it over or will. . t I i

39. One of your friends fentg copiesof this conference between M13
G.Mr.P« andpthe fefuites to Mr. T. S. in Cambridge, who being very dc-

firous to hear what was in it‘( and having not leafure to read‘ it all him 5- ‘

{elf ) gave two of them afwtay, upon condition that thofe learned ,per{_0fl9
on viliom he bellowed; them fhould read it : but they 4 both. threwit afidc
before they had read -a few l¢gy;_5 95 it.  R,C\V'crend «Mr. _ II.7él.’.liMbor,thC
deceafedi Library keeper,was perfwaded ,bygMr -  S. to-read one leafs lb!“
profefled before many witnefles he would not read another if you would
give him the whole imprcfliotlzbecaufc ’tW€lS lo unintellegible for thecaufese
above mentioned. . e

40-As for your own l?o9k(w.hich.you €.Qf!‘YRFI1d)%g3i11fl thsf. fame M r. G.of
the fame alloy, If a trait as full of falfhoqdais any Pamphlet iswont-to
be fraught with, may be belrieved agai-11_fl{o many thoufand Witncfii‘S as
11eg,~g_you both pdifpure two _d§y_es38( at length the difp1;te,i1;re:;~uPrcd by
eh; ,1;m[cgpt;:/i__¢themfelves agai~nl} all laws ofdi{pute,as you your {elf then
84 there ackngwledgedglf Mr.G_z:nnings giving the world‘ fatisfaftion at t 116

Tamc place c911,cemi11g-tl1e Wheelie matter and the Univ;erfalllchurches

tradition concerning that queflion, in a third ‘dizfcourfe afterWard:,.. at
the requefl ofthe M oderator( For the Moderator hearing both Mr. D. and
Mr. ‘G.appeal to the Churches tradition, (aid, that the Auditar} was un-
fletisfied in tbat pzzrtz',cz.Il4r, and therefore defired that one of them would take
.15? P611345 170 C104?‘ it, Mr. Define rcfufing Mr. G. did it  to which Mr.Deum*
then durll not reply 2: word..'_If I fay alligthis cannot rgfcue Mr, G, from the-
expeéiation ofan‘replyto a pauzphlctin print, 12;-caufeforfooz:'ay~’tz‘s i1J1;;71”i71ta-
we may _e-xpeét his'a_nfwer‘ herreaftefwl-)e.n= he {hall fee fit; with a relation
£5 a fo_tn1er_and ofa later jfefuites dealing and Mr. Demzes ‘collated.

 41- But in thf meanwhile to g.iV€ you and yourtfriends en.nploym€’nC i s

1th.

T  Pzpifi.  
(which Iipereeive’ you want ) and fatiisfaétion if pofiible; Aiiter you hav e
anfwered the letter in ,Qgak_er.Dif‘¢rm’d ( t‘a_lg<ineg-p in the enclofed printed
paper entituled It Gagfor'l.z}-preachers, which you may have neer the Little
N orth.-door ofS .Paul:, )1 lnall entreat you to know(beca‘ufe you ‘complain
of your books lying unnnfwered, and therein a flmndall and prejudice -toitbe
Protcfinnt caufe ) that there is a multitude of confider'al5l‘e books writ by
Protetlants in folio and ,other volumes aga-‘infl the Church of-‘Rome which
have been 20. or 30. years unanfwered 5 and are like to lye forty
more.

42.1 {hall name fome:firfi(f0r your re.aeling)zz new gag for an old goofe by
B10109 Monntdg-ue,Bp.Franc. Wbz'te,and Bp. Laud,and 'Bp.Cb2zppel/ aogainlfc
F ijber, Spalatfs 3. tomes, Bp. Hall, Birclgloeck, Crtckentborp, Bp. Moun-
tegue againfl Bullinger, Dr. Tbo. fackson, Cbz'l!ingwortb,( tho your friends
the jefuites have attempted to anfwer his pamphlet, as the call it, di-
vers times, and Mr. Knot was 19. or 20. years about one. Then in a
{mailer volume fo many that a bare catalogue of them would make a big
book, as Dr. Cofinr, iDr._'7’er. Taylor, a Dr. Fern, Dr. Ft-atl} , Dr. I-Iejlin,
Dr. Hazmmond ofinfallib1lity,and his‘difpatcber difpacbt.Thefe all ‘new,be-
fide old ones. Not to mention the heaps of excellent pieces of F ‘orrainers
Daillcus, Moulin, Blomlell, Calixtus, Boclurtus, Plxzceus, 8cC.cach ofthtm

as famous and confiderable as yourjefuites.

43. And yet you and they be the men that clamour againli the Prote-
fiants as if they could fay nothing for themfelves, . when ’tis as clear as the
fun at noon, that neither you in this apology nor they in their other
writings have a word to alledg againli us, but what hath been unanfwer-
ably refelled by the forementioned Authors and others too. times. And
yet you are {'0 wife as to complain of our filence, and the Jet‘ uite s} (for
whom youhere plead )put forth books confifiing only of queflions to the
fame men, inlieed of giving them ('0 much as one anfwer to their many de-
monflrations made againli you: and though fome of them as Mr. G. Dr.
fl. 84c. never declined any meeting with the ablefl of you and the ]efu-
ites, but attend the bufiuefs as diligently as if they had nothing elfe to do,
and have been oft declined by you and them, and can bring witnellcs to
depofe where feverall Romifh Prielis have appointed dayes and houres
and ( at the Very hour appointed) fent a flam to prevent the meeting. .

4.4. But to come clofer to you Mr. Denne, For your part, befides this
fcandalous falfe printed relation of your own here mentioned, one may
( to ufe your own words ) guelie at the confi:z'ence and boneify of Mr. Hen.
Denna by his faying not one word in his book of a publick conference
heldhy him and the fame perfon, upon the fame quefiion, at Cajiorin
Nortblzmptonjkire. But Ifuppofe'you’l publifh that when you _ print your
publick difpute with Mr. Weller of Immanuel Colledgc before the C0!!!‘
mittee at the Bear in Czzmbrid e. l

45. Befides all this, a reatgonable man would think that Mr. Gnngzing

B 2 IVC

      ')1zf.4nfw3rio_Mn.'Denns i   V y
having taken fuch paines,when you difputed with him at S.Clmm2ts cbmz».
to keep the Auditors from hilling Mr. Hen. Denna quite of} from the desk
and difpute ( as divers who were there tell me they will w1~tnefl”e )‘de-

ferves to be excufed if he takes no paines to confider your pamphleting~al7- A.

terwards. ,

. 46. The mentioning whereof minds me of your blaming Mr. T. S. for
Ambick, &c. In anfwer to which I am told, that though he ownes the dif-
pute as a true matter ofpfafi, and fo far bis 3 yet ’twas penn.ed by one of
the auditors who took it in fhort-hand: and then‘ it was no abfurdity to
fay Mr. Smith was doing that which all the Uuivcrfity knowcs he was ap-
pointed b y the Vice-cbancellour to do, in reference to printing a Cata-
logue of all the Manufcripts in C:zmbria3ge,which is now ready for the Prefi-
But fuppofe all this to be falfe, yet it will be hard if Mr. T. 8. who was de-
puted by Mr. Wbeelock when he left Cambridge without hope of returning
( Imder hand and f€a1)A rabick profelfour and bath taught that languag¢
to divers, have not more skill 11] that tongue then you have in the Erbi-
opicig who cannot read it, and yet cited that and all other tranflations 05

' theN.T. ‘in thepublick conference that you boali of at St. Clements

Church without Temple-Bar : faying you would flick to the AZTHIOPIC.
And your rcfpondeut asking you whether you brought your argument
from the Erbiopic copy or the Latin verfion ? You replyed with fome {mart-
nefs from barb, fr0m barb, Sir. Which pafTage( together with your faying

that Children cry becaufe they zzre unwilling to be bzzptizecl though tbej neitbef 1

will nor m'!l,with divers others(which you are fo faithful a relater as to pafs
over in filence)having made thofe , thoufands of people which heard you
very merry, might have remained buried in lilence, if looking into
your two Books [had not mEt with your-fEtbio,pic as well as Arabick,

47. But now leaving your lauguagesl returne to your Apology,w:her~8
§. I 3. you lay youecan notfee on} great reajbn offear or danger from the pa-
£1375, queflionlelfe your bare warrant {hall fecure all Englifh men from

owderi-plots hereafter. V 4
48- Your 14”‘ 5?. you thus begin in their defence, Iam tofu} fometlaing

- cqnceirning tbofe common Brute; which are raifed agxzinjb Pepi/la Priefis and fee

fuites, as if tbe} didfecretl} infinmzte tbemfelves into tbe Congregations 0
dzferent profeflions in Religion. To which I anfwer that Mr, Prjn, Mr.pBzzx-
ter and the relt whom you call Bedlams p. 6. 8c 19. may cry you mercy

 for the report of fecre: infinuations , for me thinks ’t1s open enough now

or let the World judge by this book of yours.

‘ 49. But let us hear what he reports thefe bedlams and bookmakers
1091)’ (by the Wayidid H. D. never furnilh the tobacco-{hop with Wall
paper They tell ( quoth H. D.) of an idle fellow §011€R¢zm/2;)'g 3“!
I_ wifh Mr. Hen.De1¢ were fuch an Idle fellow, that he be likely to have the
tithe of his Scholarlhip, though be live as long again. What this Mr-

Iiamfeyis and Was,l dcnrc Mr. Denna may learn from a book px'iflt‘}d=b§;
,  - om

e Mai-ior of th

I hear from M r.’ e A

o  ‘ up/o    ouieai pm.  .
fern; bf veryigoodi repute in Newcaflle, and the depolitions f¢n.t"up by the
7;T'0Wn.W°1th Mr. Ramjey to London; fome years before Mr.

  
  
   
   

Pynne couldgf \ _ _. F J g
2335 not impf, ned upori"a bare fufpiclon as Mr. D. faith. How he got
out of theiGat”T ufe, a11d:What~1ije,:did~1i1 Cambridge, I hadrather he fhould

>

  ."9fr:1zf‘ lI1deMC.é;G?bfitb of ChriPcs Colledge, divers of St.
johns and othe1I".

 at any thing of hisxgonference at Cambridgw; fo thathe I

olledges(whomel1e taught Hebrew) than from me ;who

am confidentl know his Religion 8: defign from other Reafons,befides his -

frequenting~7’M‘z'ltonnecr Cambridge. But furc H. D°s concluding that be-
caufeflamfej came not to further tryal, therefore he was no difguifed Pa-
pifi, is no better an argument, thanif he lhould. prove , that there have
been no Jefuits in England of late years, becaufe.(' though divers have
been apprehended) none have been brought to Tryal. W

50. Concerning the Franciftan: at Brz:/fol, the oath of G. Cow!z']haw'

Ironn"1onge..r in Brzjflol is upon record, and printed in Mr. Prym Qggkgr W.
maskt, edit..-2.p.. 3. who (p. 34-,8cc“. anfwers towhat H. .D.here obje&s
to clear the. F rancifcan. Belides him at Brzfiol,’ I could tell Mi-.Denue a
flra-nge Pcory of his Father Whitebread faying Mafs about London; and of

another difputing for the Qgakers, and prefently proved a masked Papifl:  

at Wolverhampton : but I had rather he fhould have thefe things from
others who have more leifure. When he lhall have confidered thefe and
other like relations(v{l1ich will {hortly be printed at large) I will defire
himto tell the world,whether they be grouudle/is and zmprozzed <ca[um71_ies.

5.1. To the next words, whereinhe fayes, No mans innocency will be
able to prote&. him againft fnfpition; I anfwer, That it is not fit any man
fhonldjudge,howhardly Mr. Deane lhall be dealt with by any fufpi-tiom,
further then may appearby thofe propofitions of, his, which are recolleftv
edin the clofe of this addrefs.   ' : I i i  

52. In the very next line H..D. faith, that be for his part-does 7/er} corr-
fideatly aflure hz'mfeIf,_ that if an oath were tendredto ALL the Papzfls in this
Nation, the} would willingly fwear, that ae ither they themfelves, nor any that
they know, did eaer ufe anjfizchpraflife, or ever thought it [awful to dz]]E=mb[e‘-
their lie/z’gz'ou.. Wherein H. D- exprefles quefiionleffe agreater confidence
in behalf of the jefuits, then either Clark or H/7d,tfon-2:W01ll~d of Robert
Parfims the jefuite ;or the fccular Priefts at this day will for the body of
that Society, as appears by theinbooks which for thefe fixty_ years they
have writ one agamfi another. So that H. D, is a. clofcr. friend to the
Jefnites then many Romifh Priefls be.   

53. This 15th. sf. begins thus, we all know’tz'saa.fallacz°ous may of argu-
ing to proceed‘, apoflg 4,1. 5-_g2v,. as they fpeak at Cambridge ( Do not they
f peak to at Dawn} and Sc, Omar; coo ?) andyet no better is the Argument of
the Papz‘f%’s Adverfaries z'n.thz's cajb. Here he blames fomc perfons under
the name o£Popi1h Advcrfaries, fure he_ means to exempt himfelf from the
number. And before he is gone to the middle of this page he falls again

toel

re   ‘Lin g1hfzr€?t&M73T; Dennis
;;m«ufi&et'taking 'Eor’ltI1».e P'rinc‘ipl-es‘ of 'Pope.rfy, and i p,afl'cst his_ word that
their principles Contaiii-n nothing which allowesi diflimulation in He-
li ion. -  A » .
g54. But in the lafi page hewill . needs have Mr. S. to be a f Papifi. for a{'-'
{ex-ting that we receive. the Cananyof Scripture ‘ripm. the }§l.'zthor'ity of "the
-Church of all Ages, and the purefpoufeof Chriff, I would fain be told’ by‘-
Mr. Denna what reafon hecan give to his brethren Anabaptifls and the
~tQ1_1akers,why, the Yong of Solomon {hould be Canon and other ufeifull
books which bare his name Apocrypha, why the Ptevelation “of St. john
{hould be put into the Canon 300. years after. Chrifle and fome gofpells

:( bearing the Apoiilesrnanxes ) left out, butthc authority of the jewifh .

Church for the Old, and of the Cthrifiian for the New Teflament .? But
I would have him remember that to talk of the pure fpoufe of Chrifi, and
-the Church of all ages, a-nd exclude the 12. Apoflles and the firfi Century
out of it, -is a difcourfe not becoming.Mr. Demzes profeflion. ,
V, , 55.. Suite‘ H..*D.never {aw Dr. Cofin ofthe Canon zof Scrz.'ptu're,nor Hooker’:
E.ccleiiafi'i*cal policy, not heard of St. Auguflines non Cfederem Scripturisi
.‘¢‘4z'_/it me movéret Ecelcfza: zzuthorz'tzz5.I‘f‘Mr. S. bea Papifi for this, he hath
thefe and a multitudeof fuch good Protellant-company Popijh with
him. ‘ e i s
56. You ask what other Church ‘nus there in all ages, but the Roman .?I
-anfwer, unlefs you and I agree now upon the terms of the queflion we
mufl end where we ihould have begun 5 t,hC1‘cfOI."BfirPt‘I mufi -deflre you to
tell me What you mean by the Roman Church .9 Which Iifhall fcarce
know, tillyou-anfwerthe 2o. quefiions that Mr. T. S. puts in /the clofc
of his preface to IDaz'.l[r’s apology. But that you may not pafs without
one anfwer, I pray tell me what other Church was there inall ages

but the Greek Church, and thofe that agree with. her in all or mofl C

part of what {he holds, particularly inbclieving no infallibility or Sove-
raignjurisdi&i.on( over all ) in the Bifhop of Rome, for which among
other good doetrines the prefent Roman Church refufeth her Commu-
nbn?

57. And here you mend all at lafitg for you no fooner hear talk of a
pure fpoufe ofChrifi the Church of all ages, but you apprehend it can be
underftood of none but the Roman Church‘,-, and fayplainly, that to talk
of a. pure fpoufe of Chrifi and the Catholick church in the creed,thc
church of all ages (for thofeare the words in the letter that you cite )is
doubtlefs in efFe&, to jufiifie the church of Rome to be a pure church.

38. Thus havinf.: examined Mr. Hen. Dezmes newihook and Religion,
ilihall only recolleét afew pofitions pt:-blifbt by him and his friend George
Whitehead the ‘Q_mk€l‘(VVllUm he would prove tobe no?Papifi, and there-‘

fore that ;¢oPztPijf is a Qgaker) andthen-lea‘ve Mr. D. to turn over his

.fl_€rhz'apz'ck Teflament, all the books ot«Papi{is, and ALL their hifiories;
«‘sH*1CU€aV€ theficader to judge how good Protefiant-s this Lfit couple be;

;‘ .’Q12a7£erii2a. Papijfl-- r 

' H,1).‘an~dG.PP’.',‘ George'Wbitebezzal be'1:ides,tliof'e. pa’r‘ti'C;ularsi Wliic-hare y

"mentionedintlie ueries he1'eto:‘an'nexed (efpecially pl. 14.. and? 16. )

maintaines thefe {even folloévinag‘ 7Romi{hu_do&1‘ines: I..4T/mt jufiifi-
cation is by inherent ri_gbteez_zfiief}.:. and fo fa1th1noProteflcant but. {oh faith

I:"‘€[[2ZT1_7_!-1.711.’ 2. db’ jrifiificttto 0- 3- 5 fly. =‘I7:nztammz may perfefib t Iiegpf tlm

’ law rrit'I;'oat*fia:Ib faith‘ (not P7'¥9t€/i4~'7tf5sbllt)Be[[:‘[. '4.o_t£6 0. II. 12. 13..

I  gly. G. W. denies tbe ’impu’tc’d.; riglatféilfflefi afC12ri/ifor ufiificatioa :
fo Bell: 1.2. de ju_/iif. C. 7. s 4.1)’. G. W’. affirms that Scripture is ?9f0T the

fupream rule for trialof flviritsi {:0 Bell : Z. 3. de aerbo Deiw c. 4.. sly. G-
W..hath writ an whole book agamfi: Mr. Clap/mm to prove that the writ- ‘
- ticn wo;-dis but a dead le.t.ter,and carnal.So fa-ith'Cojieru3-"in ‘e’}1C]J_}'.TZ.(ZlZ'0. p.44.

ély. G, W. pretends to immediate Revelzzfifhzs and pretended mirxzc1es( fee

Clizpbam and the century of queries) fo dothe Papifis: unchurching them,

who retendnot to them as triall of a Church. 71y. G. IV. and the

Papifi both alike plizcc much aftbeir balinefs in'tb.,-ir ‘beggzzrlj zippzzrrellg ,:,._,..

going openly witbfaelgcloatb and bzzrefaated, whicli [find taxed by -the anci-
ent Fa-,fh~€I'.S‘ of the fchurch-. ~. . ' %   Thus far G.  . ’
5.9.. Now,fQr -Mr." Hm. Demzegl hope the Readerhath‘ ere this obferved,.

‘ that though this bookof his beforetis be eiititltlcdfifor ‘the ;Qiga‘I»\ers, _8t(as«

I amtbld) was offered- to them at the Bull and Month. in A[dersg4te-flreet
for their prefs, . et it is indeed all in behalf ofyithe lPapi{fs.5ai1d conteins
not one word fromthe firftto the Vlafi) to t%‘lie+advanEage of any fear;
under heaven but only the Romilh : That the very fame argumeats,’and
the very fame exprcflions are ufed now againft the Church of England by
the Allabaptifl: and bythe Papifi, (0 that  who a_n_[wers one of them-
a‘nfvircrs' both. ' .11‘ might take‘ notice alfo‘ of ftxlehii-‘wbrili in this-i‘Q;zal§er no.
Paiiifl, as eaufe the Author thereofwhoever he be ( H. D.orW.or

W5]. for I take them to be all one man ) to fmcll of a forrcin Conn- »

trey : as when he fpeakes of the ]Iii7iC€ of peace in bi: Diiirtiéi, p. 10. and:
cal__,ls_ the_ fame man Bzztcbelomt of Divinity and VMa§7er of Arts, putting this

All-ea3feei~ that,“ an3."che like : but to let this pafs I {hall only mention a few of-

Mr. Hen. Demies politions delivered by him in this traét (for I have not
leafure to look into Mr. FLObOtl‘JamS.._D€iz aftimves ) and then leave our
Difputant and Scholar, to read his flirlazgqjric books. Some of his Do~
&ri--nes- printed-in thisbookentituled .Q?.’!.t1kt,‘E;J,20 Ezzgélis §1L£;£.l].§,f§5

60. 1. That Mr. H. D. does not know whether Purgatory be revealed I

in Scripture or not. p...1'2.;l. pgnulr. ’ 2.. That ’ti-s clear who ever takes _
the oath ofeabyuration doth forfwear the _171‘lVl'l¢dg§SQf_' Parliament. p. 14....

media. -3.Tl1atinlgoad czzrmffi hethinks-:tl1Q{c Wh.O lladathtirlordination

-from the Church'offB;.ome and do not obey. ~the‘Popc5 tare Rebells, difo-

iladient-kxfiuiidpoifatesfiifthey defend the nyeéeihty p_f,!.or.dinat.io11 by "Big
fhopsp. 16. media.” "14. That he finds as, nxmah; 'l}9i1§fi;p\roeeedi1_1gs andi

credit in Papifls as in Proteflants p.15.l.penu[t.8c.can fee no great reafon of

fear or.d4nger‘fro;n papifis p. I36’!-"3-‘ 5; That he does . very-Confidfiiztly.
’ . r a use

 _

H22 A}z_{.i.v_ér..ta. Mr. Denné D

..alTures himfelf l'ur.e no n’1an.elifcL can affuire him  that if an "ioatlx were.
tendred to all/the papifis in this N ation ;they would :»all willingly {wear ’
-that neither the; themfelves nor am} that they know, did ever ul‘e any fuch

prafiife as is reported of oliamjelv -by Mr. Pryrz(and fome in C/z,mhridge)and
of a Francifcanby Mr. Baxter; and fwearithat neither they nor any they

know did ever make profeflion for whatends foever, to be of any Religion

fave only their own, p. 19. fine. 6. That no Proteflant Minifier either
in Englwd or beyond the fcas hath any better ordination or conimiflion

to preach then G. Whitehead the Q;._lal<er. p.- 8, 9, 10. Lafily( for I

will not trouble the reader with recollefcing all that the prefent Roman

i Church andlno other is the pure fpoufc of Chrifi, or elfe there, hath
beennone -inallAges. ' " I »   e   ~ _

From thefefeez/en Capitoll ezflerltionr of Popery let any in-
dzfereizt marzjudge whether Mr.H. D.  net2:m'tIJfim-ed.
ing his 7/ehemerztpretendingx to the contrary  may not
hejufily thought to fowmrt-he it dofiriue of the‘1)reh‘e;gt
Roman Church, alittle more then 4 man ofhzlr profeflion

   (which is Anohoptifmeyzext door to Qgakery )fho;:ld do,

 fo till you unfwer thefe rhreefcore Paragraphs  hid you heartily

Farewell.
Q u E s 110 N S.

....

J eE.—1{1{A—f1’%'A.. .
- N the letter to Mr. D.p.2.l.I.r. miflionfi. 31. 1‘. Bellzzrmines 18 Cozmcelso
 In the Q_L_1eries, p.2.‘l. 1~1..for let the reader judge, 1‘.No conclufion can be
faljé when the premifes are true, l.24.. oft fordids,-«p.-I 2. 1.28. r.Sr Walter L29.
Cezmtefs of Sidney,p.1-3.1. 3‘5.dele viz. loft’ wrath;/y"c...p. I_6.l.I.>.6;©-. l. ;z.;lu.¢.P.

. e-16.1.16. for~at»the.e;zd«bf r.r>z'n7tlae preface to thefe queries.

_ . . ..
' ' * Lu:-nu--""’
ufijir I _ f ‘ ‘
_. > 3 _A'_‘_ H >_ . "W ’_A __ N _ . A < _..., ...____:_,_.._ - ,. ......... .,- . _ .. .

   

ing? An{. this is it needle]? and faolijh gaefiion. Rep. Tis {uch as over?
throwes your impeccability the foundation of Quakery, but of this {cc
much more at thejehd efthe additional century of queries. ‘   e
54. Did your Companion fin or not by drawing his {word in ‘your
meeting houle tothet day, to cut the knot . when’ he i could not untie it,
and anfwer the argument. _An{. Slemderer !Rep. .VVitne{s is Sr. Rezveh
of Tri/2. Call. and divers of the tell: above mentioned.    ‘ I ~
5:. Why will you ltill pro{e{s your {elf to be an Embafladour of
Chrill ( {entimediately by Him, with an in{aIlible_{pitit)s and yet that
you pretend no more commiflion nor can fhowinfo more fignes of it than

  all hereticks have with as much colour pretended .>x'Anl. We have‘; [.41

for our miiziflery, “viz. the power of Goa’ 5 which there art out of, as M (yer;
are. Rep. This is largely confuted in the 2. {beet o{_ the di{pute. .
Laitly,I entreat you to tel me (after you have givenmcin Wtitinga pun‘-
Gcuall an{wct to the{e 55-queries) how 1 {ball know that you will not give
me another an{wer next week quite contrary to that which you ipromi{e
to give me now ( telling me that the Spirit moves you to {peak contra-
diétions as plainly out of your meeting hou{e as in it ) {o thatl {hall be
as {at to {eek what your Religion is at left, , asI was at fitlt 2 An{. Filthy
dreamer, cliviner, _/lazzderer 1 in thaefiate thou art £72, ‘thou czmfi never /mow
us nor our religion. Rep. This is {mall encopirageinepntsfot me todeal more
with you if you allure me that ‘till I‘ am 'a<Qu‘aket :( Whichel ‘cannot ‘be
while you hold contradiétions and deny conclufions ) Ifyhall never be a-

ble to know what their religion is. ;But becau{e youhete quarrell at me  

forno-t {ub{cribing my name{, Idefire you to tell me why   R. B.“ are not
as good letters’ as K.  whichis all-you {et to your .an{wer-to-Hag-
gear and other books. To your anfvver to.E. Brecle are no l€-tiers “for any
name.2ly. I have ob{erved,in tho{e few of your books that I have {een,
that when the molt grave ferious and eonfiderable men are {o charitable
as to {loop to you,you bedaub them with; all the dirt o{ Bz'Ili;gg[gate 5
therefore I being no confiderable petfoncould not hope to efcape that
which I do not deiire : for example 5 Dr. Draytan an{wers the queries
ofj’. Pernel who calls himfelfa youth (being about I 6 years of age )’ and
calls the Dr. of Divinity impudent blafphemer, {oul-mouth,.cotrupt
heart, earth-worm.p.18. fame; Pamelcan plainlyvtell theeffham. Dray-
I0i2tl1':-ll art a lycr, adumb dog,’ 12.10. I 1:. an hypocrite, a deceiver, by
an in{alliblc teltimony p. 7 . thy God whom thou praifefi is. the D(‘V.i_l,
the Father oflyes, who n-tuft hothbe tormemfed- together 12. 9. Thy {pirit

  C I I )  

is much againft]. Perm-l 5 how. dareft thou open thy mouth againfi
the Lord and againfi his anointed who art fiill in thy ungodlinels and
wotdly lulis p. 172 thou hireling, fetpent Minifter of Antichriftp. 7 5,
with me fuch words.---fi cum (tercore certo, rvineojeu fuz'22cor--- __;_

T. 5. hearing how caufelefly you and your friend have befpatterd
him, anfwerd as Soemtes in Diogenes Laertius did when one kick: him)
"i "3 MI 3»: EM'x’l1a1, J‘ixb.u _o'r ai.or_J ikdyxxror 3 and becaufg hg Concgivfis Vou

 

e are very defirous of fatisfaétioneis not unwilling you fhould fee thele

following certificates.

Hzlving this Lela} rerxd the 52.6. dilri 333. pages ofrz Book erztituled Truth

Defen'di‘ng8zc.f:t out by G.W.mod G.F ox wherein is a relation of the P4:

_ rz'_/hioners of Caldecut being very zmwgzjjng Mr.“ Smith floould be their Minijier,

e9*c.zmd my telling them(after thejhad fet their h'anc1s)l that now he”/llould 56‘
fbt‘z'r,Mim'§1er, and have the lioingin defpéte of theme £9“-c. I do. dmlfthrtt
thefe things which they fat} and here recite are not true: and that there befe-oerall

-0’;-N'«’7‘tfaZfitz'es in thofe two pages.‘   /Ilfo Iatteji that Mr. Smith was . l°'¢d”57¢'<£

into Caldecut peaceably in the prefenee of me and feoerrzll of the Pari/himers,
the Bells ringing, 6%.‘. no mom gainfaying in Ofkob. 1650. And the time of
7"} Pndcbifig it C3ld€Cut( which W. and F. «here mention) wt: about four
year: after,as appears 6} the date of the fevemzzpapm. 7Vitnefs my haml and
fealthit 1-. ofN0v. I659.  - . ~   s ‘ _ ‘
. W. Eagle; Minilier of Bzzrmem-[1, and condu& ofK1ngs Coll.
This Mr. Bugle} hath been chofen for three feverall years Taster by the
Univerficy, and therefore it feems is reputed an honcfi man in Cambridge
but leaf’: you fhould rcje& his teftimony (becaufe he is a Mini(te'r)hear the
Parifhioners. - l i ‘ '   i ' i i ‘  I
‘  Patijhioners of_Caldecutzy'ntthe County of. Cambridge do ft’./fific’ ll-‘tit.
We do 5e_Iz'eoe‘tbe forerfientioned certificate to be true, and that Mr.
B=g1eyofBarnewclland Mr.'Smith our Mz’m’_{ier are -oer} honefi men, and

that we were ‘never again]? Mr. Smith his heiug our Minifler, and that P.(t>;ho V

is the one!) man, ifany, ‘now g_g¢;‘,g{{_ him A was the mag? hot rmel forward more
for Mr. Smith, till he left dieting a.t,theflziei,;P°S§ houfe grind alfb when the former‘
certificate wasfigncdfiveyears finee: andjthat P.‘ [peaks the more =gai>2,’tZvIr.,
Smith hecdufe Mr. Smith will not let» him keep the poor mans rent from them.
W z'tmf]‘e john Atkin, Will. Lill , Tho. Curvey, John Day, Sac.

 For your im}-erfe& fiery ofy the difcourfe ( which was long) between
the Major of Cmnlzridge and T. S. fee my reply to the 5. query p. 2. What
ever quefiions Mr. Nicholfon askt T. ‘S. about the Sacraments I am affixred
tl:at,_he anfwcred them in the very words of the Catechifm or Scripture]

Butthvbnder not that you ( not rcmembring that revilers jkall not enter
1:134-1’1“’7l);';lhOltld {lander him being a MiniI’tc'r, when U66 YOU Call 0 7V r1119

drzznlgrditllrice in lefs than 20. lines p. 68. whom all(that know him)
 2 t know

A lknow~to?be as tetnperatet 8~:i'asi‘e1:cmplary»'a:liPe as anjfniatiin the Com1tr}*

And‘,p,69. yoL!fay*1h€ 1'5 t0:?"§7916i?¢.fi€6Lf0r.1¥?Titil¢'g 4g«z-z‘ns‘?‘}o‘u 5% when ’tis fulfi-
cicntlly_ltu_own, tlia-the’is,tr<_31'lbled with..nofot her 1nfix=mt1t'1[esA%:t_ what he

. u

had'Beforelweutertainedéitliought.ag¢i:ifi§:7éht.C¢3-t   -
'fI’fliélT'c'orlcltidéwitli?Y<§iitTO3V  ‘dsm 4;. f0fih1S'_2iIiTW€i';'f6fi13"iii15-

mos ll) 1 M232 t%2it‘f¢‘.d3"f f/aE’5L"b:7Zi‘j}z?'§‘ l‘_1_$2oVe“ ‘cztlgfigjusl  c’oj'zn"f'et,‘ It/2_zz;z~
to p,,1;~[z'f}¢.mzi;¢*b2tbZings‘fdf tl:‘Ilzf7J'§ Vvlhchcé-Io‘ 1h-l'e‘i'1‘l1:'h21'tG‘. 717. and Fox

{  of th‘e'1f'  :ar‘e,!1Ut  that '_ fC2Il'" Chf  ; btfi
caufe they have not; been   .cautio.11s; in publxlhmgo .difcou’rfes~,». but have
publifht vain bablings fo ftruth. However Ilc bellow‘ tan anfworto their
37_ m1el.;c$ hoping that thcy’l do as much fo1'n1)f century of addxciouall.

:4 Mia f Rgpzyltot 37. Qaeriet propaundezléj  W. to ~41: tlaezariejzs and 5:555

Tlars i}2“Cah1b1*idge, or oelfiwkeréfg towle’i‘ldirré?lj;‘%‘ ;

1 l .Fi¢‘té:l1'er au'ynio_W adayes max be’ nf:'A1’clel_ tr1j¢‘Mi11lflé‘fs“«of Chlm
without going to the .U1I1‘:ve_rfit;1e’s} ,Anf. Tea‘, tbutllwberea;
tbere be onzeiitlszzt tmdcrffaml Lzztine, Greelg, » and Hebrew, who

 

are ofzmblanzable converjxztionfeizt 2znd'orr1‘4imd, ‘ forrm} ( tlmt have none of

all tbefe qiia[ificlatiom)fo'run zmfen't,z's t0 glof)’ lz'n_'_S .P‘€t¢1.jS‘Cbzzra5?er.2tl’et.3.16’,.
. 2; May any now audayeis c‘xpe& inm”1c.d1ate l11fP.1‘1_'1l§l'0_IflKtO be made Mini.-
flers. AnCNzzj.    '   , A   o l }  , _t

3. oA%rc not all who dcayzijmmediatc tnfpn_tat;o1; pow‘ a'1cla}fs?'fdté"cive1's.r
Anf.Ndj. l    

4. Mayall that belongs to the trm‘.CI1urcl1 be‘ Mii1ifiers,thlLo”ugh F i{hcr-
men ?  Na}; none unleflif fem meoli:z_te”l}v orzfmm cziz‘}zft‘e[}, mzallif tI:¢}pre-
mm! :0} immediate m;g7oirc.m' prove it bjfi‘x‘i1'2i‘Clesan}sl1a‘njgi22zge$5 is the Faber-
merz z'nVC}.7ri§?s time did, A ._ V .  1 g  - -_ _ . . >/ o l . 

5. Who Werc‘th¢y_t1li'at built the Collédgcs, ‘and"ca'lled’then1 Trti;_;~i¢§;-
Coll. 81c. werénot they Papifis? AM. Na}. ,Kz'ng Hem} 8. Sr. Hm,
Mildmay, Dr. Cazius, Sidney and‘2nm,z},o'tl:e‘fs oftbem weft‘ Protefiants. ‘I be
queflion is more gonfidfrables _Wb‘o /lvafilljiaéid upon an infambzzs record, for be-t-‘
irgg the fiffffullérs d'oj2ét‘,oftboj21Cql{t4ges mBz'cb'tbejv nevérrf 5z¢4'z'rltl?. 8' { . l 3

1 6. W are’ they "S-a‘i lot-S or"Applf_‘ CS that dctzijcfed mfg) lh‘oi1ld be made Mi’-‘T
zlifiers at Collledgcé. ,A‘flfl'yN€if5.€?fdT ’t'1fv.eg5’7ietvei*_zZ¢’éree2l.. L t 1 l    

‘ 7;‘ By whofe order w'ere_Scholars‘ firll brought 1'1'p'lit’1l~C_ollcdges.+ Anf.‘
B) Gods; who mentions Scbaolfof the P?‘fopbe't:~ ahd "Ilse wry word Calledg.

Why have they tltefe !r;1amels‘MaI’tt_:’r’ of Arts B. D; Dofiour of Divinity .9
Azzfz B} tbéfame 11-a]'on,tbiitj?;méi:fifel— maid: fflfptgenti-ces, anjql, flame. jaurnejé
mm, andfomé freemenxalnd fioméI>‘re‘ziI{. ‘   ' ‘ o

  Whencc had you tliié’ fort ofGowns"for,M._ A, B‘. Dffilxadl D. ID. Anf, .

from Calvin, mid the Lawn ofcivzl Cprporiitivns.
Whofirft”invcntcd and ordctcd that praitife you call commenccment;

  h . .9 1 .
Ant‘. He whfirzventecl §’c.’:oIar5-exerc‘ifes_:md M://z"ersfar Soz»Zrdz'ers in’A‘rmz’=e:-.

9. May fume learn Divinity where others learn to he Phyficia11§,Pr‘iefi5i

8(c. Anf. Tea. _ e - h %   é i.
10. Who was the firfi Pricfi that preacht with Doftrines, Rea-fons ,
Ufes? Ami. St. P4211. Read Heb.‘ cl;%2zp.g. 63“ 4'. @‘c.

Hath not this Method reiation to Heathen théams, Aiifwer mi: ciiteifizly; ‘

AnC.Na}. I 1 . >
It. WI1e'i1eeIe‘a'rne'dyou thofc words, Perfonh, Trinity Elxcharifiz

Didthey notrife from-payifls? Anf. Nd}, from zfob. 5. 7. H912. I. 2. 3.“

”*x«ys'fa, Epb. 5,4. Phil. 4. 6. After H. Scripture Zmgejt cmtb ¢zr¢fe~:fig,y;_1;_,',,
‘bf fi?'s“z’ Ecclefiztftical writers : as in Tertullian contra Praxe,m),Q7Py;'4;¢ frag},
beret. baptiz. azlj'14b_ajzwIW- . N : ._ A r  j 1  e ' ,
I2. Are not a1‘l'?Perfn§s'vifiblei? ‘ Anf-. Nd}: For St. ‘Paul chills Goa’ the Fa-
tber'( wbomyou dare not deny to be 4 perfbn.) the Inviflbie God, And to den},

17z"mJ_to bcfp is gig:/ycrefie, 1‘;/3z:t/2t1W_B.g'c/97:_9j.222_;z;1T‘__c‘g;gz;bej.fztzIede,‘: . . _ . e >
. 13- Whéflzcr ch , body 0F.iChrt ch -ti fu1fred'..atjm2j§zlgm b¢‘no't a~p‘é1*é
. .--.. I.~A/I .-«.o *‘ ~. _— ‘ 

2‘. )’ _’

foil“? Ant. ‘Nzzj, “.2eoa‘y' ."s'..ar“.z pg»; oi}.

I4. Had_Cl11‘ifi_in that body Qther.-..tWo perfons,?_A1_{I‘. vhathqri

tbéH.’Gly.g_/f-*&y§g[«’¢ tb?flSvn.of G0g.til';i":IZ_yéS,' eijen 'i1p0‘7i“'tbe' Crbfs": the Fzitihere

was in bim :z.’&-dab“: i~;iZ‘h"’ Ffltbffg (Ind the H. Gbofi in 50119.‘ iI,‘y'o‘u uriélérflkzrflt

not this myfier} read Pla“c.:ei1s.izn2:’"Mr.Efiwick. . ‘ _ _
. To 1:he’.‘_~’;:5. -1:6.‘ .23; 124. 34. I.«a11fwer&’etz..;. .To the 3.2. andgs. ‘Nay. ~17

I i7} Whiatfis €.hf3;,1i1'3FP.r;ii!C3P19 Ofthe Oraclcs 0f.Gé>d.:Aflflffihpentdnce-»
.frag,,[m'd.§pQ;t]<‘_;._...Heh.-6.,1. ~ . ; ‘ ‘ “  4. 5

I5 13,] ,.?(9%d§_‘ tl.veKiy ofzgmszedge, :5} 1m ..'...z ’...2..;..,,
eru ea 2 e - V t  
20, What is thecandle of the W icked*? Anf. Life. t L .    V
:21; H,owrof1:'iS!t'put'0ut?.Anf. -Ghcei;    4 1V t  ‘ T ' i L

._ .

22. ; Wheref€)rcisi.light3given tohxm that is inimife1%y..«?_: A‘11[’.i‘ ffbat‘f{zti~ ‘

face ;;m)I,bai¢;e_£1€i‘,]2P?’ft’é?"W01‘}(,6’-.  .‘f~; . _   - I» -. 5:  .:_ 
93,- Whatisthat which the Gofpel is preached to, _&.i:- An{_'.~,‘.'I'o the ‘Soul.

‘26; What" is the Soiiiof man? Anf. Tbzit which deg/tzrts out of mtfnsibodyt  

.-27:. wage i§‘th’e§ a2rresé.ace between die saa1? .;.ia‘ ;§.;;.;i;»i;eo.;.fi;.j;z..;:4.g

IW; a’”2'i'a?tZve'bfbé%htI5é‘loia5ei~'S§u‘l, 'vi‘z.t 12.1%; gzarizrza, 80:. L
‘.28? 2.9. jSee Dr‘. Hemnionds nbtes.   - 4 =  ‘ "
30. What are the inhabitants of the Waters? Anf. Fifbes‘.
. 3;. What_be the ‘dead things under the VV2i;ters ? Am’. Pearles-

a . 5 . - .

32. What is that the Gofpel mufi'b€'jPr_caeht toils H¢1=;l:th'ei1s~.? Aénfi 

fcie‘rrée~.‘ i ‘ A‘ *

3'7. May‘ah§*'bé"pe'1‘fc€€While up’_.0R1.1     jay thkeii  

’tz'.« 2 cm. :5. 17. for upright, my M; .34.1;beirwzm¢e.;sye;7t ,<»;.,.ry.

    (14),

An anfwer to the Challenge ofG. iW.lan’d  Fax bf an ad,
ditionall century to the 55. CczmI9rz'dget()\ueries.
The .5/rallelige 1'; in tbefe words, .

L“ A 1/Vbatiewerptbou be that gar:/efbrtb the 5 5 . Qgtefliom, I c/94]..

‘T "long thee to prove any railing languagefpoken 12} any of uy ~

ag’a'z'.7zfl C bijzfl aim’ the word" of God. Trutlldefending the

 Qgakers. p. 2 6 Q

Of Chrifi and ef the V\/‘ord ofGod.  

Ecaufe Ifee you make _no fcruplci of denying any thing, that you
{ kef-5 Iihall now 1n‘fiance“oI3lY‘In whatyou have printed;
_ tercote , J, p    ;. ~  ‘ ’
I.   Isitnot railing againfl God [Father, Son, and H. Ghofl] toifay,
tlfzfcbthrce {hall-b€‘»_d4n_mea', up in perpctualll dargfnefi for the lake am!
am" 1.‘ ‘c it, as you ay In yourl mad p. -10. . a ». .
2. , nd zlyz is it not railing againfi the word of God, to, ~ allert that '
thenew Teftament is no better than an eld Alma.nWa.cl.<~.2. Which yeu
»do1neFfe6hn your anfwer to -Clop/yam .ent1tuledjCa1m a’tfc01m°ea'p. 5, 1, S
wljfl/y, Where you lay tlgjgt what Poul wrote zmto the Epiaefiamg and Colojjiam
' at not concern usmrt zsgeneratzomp , S _ S _ S ‘ . -

_ 3. Is it not railing againfi the word of ,God,to. fay that they are teachers
oft/16.24120’/‘t’t[a,I_‘1,Cl_i_I1;C[fff)ll1‘e\«Vl1O" profeffe the Scriptures to be their rule to
walkhy, asyou_fay,1b1d. p. 10. And that the are hlind guides, who
teaching’ the people fay, Aleleatken t9 the wot of the Lord as ’tis. in.
{uch acnaptet and vcrfe: Cloudofwztnejfes p.4. S . O _

4.? And that_yout,companton gltkzfzfon ( \fvhoWas fe la{c1v~1ous in and
ahout.No‘rziézcl2) and the tell: of you teachetslhave as full 3. ;mea_{ute of V
the fpntit as the penners of the Scripture had Tmtlas defmfé 12. 43. anfzver

. ¢oHarris28.qucr_ies pgg. ’ _

5. And that they, who believe the Scriptures'to be ‘the Saints rule, are
natural men and hypocrites, who are forbid to judg fuch as you are 5 and
that men who have thishigh opinion _of the Scriptures cannot difcem
the things of the fpitit of .God.‘ib.‘ pp. 14,. .

6. Ahcl that he ivhé hath no light to walk or f peak by but the Scrip-
" . . Fmnlfik/],€ Int-LA

 

7.‘ And while you thus vilify Scripture, do not you place your own
writings infteed ofit, calling Smééek prattle the pure ward of I/Je-Lord t0
the people .> ( Lmées defenfe . IO. 1. 1.) calling‘ your own books the
word ofGod ( fee a prophecy of?

the mightyday of the Lord p. I 3. vials.

of the truth of God p. 57. 9. IO. Newes from the North 32. Io. 24. ){

which is an higher term than ever you give to the H. Scrzptzrre in any of
your books or lpeeches, that ever I law or heard.

8. Do not you fayrhat he whocounfels men and women to make ~

their fervants read’ Scripture‘,&: to bring them to the lpublick ordinances
will prove anotherbloody Banner and is a traitor to the King of Saints 3-
Prozwlpbarzfee reprovcdp. 37. A . ' -   i_ 3 ’
9. Do not you fcofif at fetching joy from Heaven to comfort the
heart againfl; forrowes .> iéia’. .39. 41. . i 8 ~
IO. Is it notblafphemy to feliy that the God whom. Dr. Dwzytm ( and

3 the Church of Englzmd)'praifeth is the Devill,the father of lies.-who éotb

mull be tegrmemedtogetlyer as you fay in‘ Goliab 12.7.8: to fay that Sr.T.He-
wits wotihip of God is fi«lthy,p. 2.btit fee more of him in Q. 96, 97, 9 8..
I I. Is it not againft Chriil to fay, that he whofaith Chrilli {hall one
day come again perfonaly leads the people into a pit of darknefle and
blindneffe? which you fay oftfiin Imzam/cy of the righteous fled p. 7. 8.

1 2. And that ’tis no deceit to own Chrift no s‘ otherwife, than as he *
-was before the world began. Barrough agaizgfl Bunianp». I 3.

I 3. And that the denying Chrifi to be come in the fleih ‘( which {S
:1 mark of Antichri-B) is onlydenying Chrifl to be come in the fleih of

his Saints? Mafaa againll fahzzfozz. _
 14. And’ that your fpirit is the rule to try fpirits and Scripture by 2

«Anfwer to ‘Pram. Harris‘ 28. quericsp. 9.. » z   t _
  I5 . And that they who deny this can never know Chrifl nor the voice
Of the Scriptures, tl‘i‘o’u.Gh they read themevery day? ibidem.
16. And to {av th§tc- it is abominable in the fight ofpGod.to-‘pray to
Him 9 Pamelin his watch 46. y . j 3 «   8 ,  
  17. Is it notyour conflant dosftrine that no wicked man ought to
pray? Galiabp. 15, e'9’c.. contrary t.o.]’oh. I. 6. 14-. Aft. 18. 22. jam‘.
5.I;.]er.1o.25. c 3 3,3
I 8. Is it not more plainly a {in for a- wicked man to plow Pro. 2 1.4.
“:9. Is it not clearfrom Deut. 8'. 3-. Prov. 30.. 5; let. 2;. 36- that

Godhath more words than one. Every word that'procéeds.a.2t of the meat}: 3

91° God 5 is thatgcvcry C/zrzfi that proceeds .>. 10" Db?

. 21 9-.  Y9i1fthiI1l<:it_ .é—.g0§§1. aFgl1m,Cn.t ithat hecaufefihrifi i§..§b'«S.;
therefore}-the Scripture 15 not M9‘ the word of GQC1 ‘.> Is,I10t this a bet-
ter,Chr1ft is the/‘oz; of God,thet_efore W.and Fox are not thefogzs of God}

5  Paper)"

2t. ls  amodeftppetfon, whodchaptgeyth T. S. with rank pope-ry ‘

for believing trarxfl4{ia22tiation,i when hé knowes that T. S. hath primed
.a book agatnfl tranfubfiantiatton which hepofferd to give to G. W. in the

honfeotmr. NiqIgqi[an1a:ely,;M@i0r ofCaInbricl.%€?

32‘. May henot with as much truth ( and by the fame reafon )charge
T. S. with rank ¢.0\/my/eerj, becaule he hath? («at the .inPtigation of the Ma-
jors wife and other Quakers as  Acldczs ISIIOWCS) difputcid againfiit.

2 3. Have Wcnotcaufe to believe you G..,I4/ézitqbead to beta Papifi for
ntaiinaining ntheabove mentioned fl.p9fiI1<§ms1 ;aga1nfi the written word,
.9414Q§l1$r:I%<?P.ifl3.dOsitril:€Ss;¢XPf¢tr.'3difl.1l79l’?!‘€l and Otherof Your prin-
tcd books, (twbcrcofiyouhaycfe\'€n.to1dy9u,in the anfwcr to H. D.
at th_e.en_d ofthefe queries.) 2ly.Eor.refufi1,1g to abjure any one point of
pope.ry,«Whe_nl~it .appears_-by divers paifages in H 4rtJ‘0r4ll2ire,. Caméridge
and_other Counties that Qzakets do not;hO1§l itwfilawfull ( though they
Hlzylce th;is_the.itt_c«XCufe Wh€11,th€;y have nmllilld) to -ta.kC 3 fcvlenm oath
.betoreia‘Mag,il;lr_a.te to eleer themfelve-.5... 3l~y.:- deterring -the com—
mon people from reading Scripture, by telling them in your book againflz
C 1412194222. iris carnal .( the letter kills) and th€I€fOf€’ ccannotlfafely be
read by them .4ly. For defending C élk".3?»',lj7.24.l B ;:3lImrli1I..with. your collegue
F- .\y.h9m yout‘; havre. feen: -I20Y€Cl,a Eapifiebx wirneifes in  book prin-
ted for j’. iAlZé~;2 in 3. Paul: hutch,-yardyp 571- And sly- for your pre-
§Cfn‘d'1'x_1gp,tQ i1_1f€i_l‘libl.llty inall points. 6137. For your laying confidently in
the MajOrS.hOi1l‘e1t/.7atjoz¢ knew all the I-‘zzthers oftbtfirfl three hundred years

' zzwre Papifls. 7ly.. For your citinggplacestin theEx*1p0€ry[2iId for Canonicall

' no.ther.{e8c) and you do as much for them againfl us Proteflants.

Scripture as Pzirizcl Clt€S Wifd. 4. 8. 9. t.o.§.1L1§l.C'..1,«.€7.J.- V19. 22,. fee fG.0lI:Ab
52. 63. 8ly.,F-or ieftifing totell the;peop1e (though Oftutged thereto) at
your meeting houfe in.palace—yard laft May, Whcthier you were a Roma-
nill: or not: your companion thereupon w‘ink1ng at you, and caufing
you to befilent, and.let.tanot.here i’candiup.and exercife in your Reed. gly.
:Bec.au{e the Papifles talk paffionately (as nituch-—_conccrned:). and «write
books in. your behalf ( which I conceive they would not do for any ofa-'-
IO‘.

Be-

  ( I7) .
fiecaufe when you are not among Scholars ( as at Lyn and other places)
you pretend to learning of all forts,divine and human,skill in the original
languages,8cc.but when yon are at Caméridg you appear unveril in a ll
manner of learning,if I may believe your deer Apologifi Hen. De‘/me

I rly. Becauie ’ris very probable that you are an einiflary of Pa. VVhite-
bread at Weflminzfler, a diiguifed_-- But of this H. D.fhall hear more fud-
denly. I 2lv.( for 11¢ trouble you but with one douzen at once )ior joyri-
ingyour {elf to fuch as have licenfes from the Pope to feduce men in En-
gland withthis exprefs claule. non obfizmte concilio 7’ria’e;2tz'22o.y The ori0'i-
nal iinftrument of one ofthefe your brethren vfryers (with this punétual
expreflion 720;: oéfiamte concilio Tridehtii7o)b€ing now in the hand of the
Town Clark of Brifiol. _

24. Do not you fay that you have the fame gift to work mif21ClCS as
was among the Apofiles .2 Truths defenfe p. 43. Did. not you and your
-friends C. Alkinjba R. Hnééertlzam &c. pretend to miracles about Nor-
\‘V1Cl‘l. C laplmms dtfcoverj p. 45. . _

2 5. Did not Suflzzz Pearfoiz Qaalcer attempt ( th0U;'-Eh V3U1lY) to fall‘?
from the dead Will. Pool clothier and Quaker of Worcefler, who being 3.
Qiaker drowned himfelf in Feb. I 6 57? ,

2 6. Did not Will. Allen your fellow-preacher affirm at Ald. Blaclflzes
‘houfe in Camérid e Sept. I 6. I 659. that he himfelf was in all particu-
larls ofunderilanfiing abfolutely infallibile,and in point of praiftife impec-
ca le .> s ,

27. Are not fuch affertions as thefe concerning (infallibility Sc impec-
cability) likely to make more Popes,and worfc Papills in this than CV61‘
were in former ages 2 . . _ _

28. ‘Are not thefe Romiih Deélrines of your abfolute infallibility and
perfection the two pillars of the Roman Church and yours 5 which be-
ing dellroyed (by inllances) all the refl falls to the Ground ?

Of Material] CImrcheJ'.

29. Are you of the fame mind with thofe Qiaker-hand-maids, who
fubfctibed a petition not onely againfl Tythes,,the Clergy, and Leammga
but alfo for felling Colledge-lands, pulling down Steeple-houl¢5 C 35 Y0“
ipeak) Bells, and free-Schools Z

30. If you be , how can you affure the poor people Of E”£l"”“' ‘ml

our next petition will not be agaigfi Hofjzitals, and all the 1afld$ b"1°‘?§"
l is _ I g

(18)

ing to the   I 2. Companies in London,‘ and to take away wliadbever hath
been bequeathed by our ancefiours to pious ufes .3 ,

  3 31 . Is not Chrilt as capable of receiving lands, Comrnunion~Plate,
or other utenfiles, as of meat, drinl-:»,, and cloathes .3 Will he take vi-»

étualls and refufe revennues, be fed to day and flarved tomorrow .2 Ma:..

2 . 2 . 2.

S3  14f that be truewhich Chrifi faith, Mat. 2 5. that what is given to
the poor and piousufer s is ‘given to Chrift, by what law’. of God or man
can it betaken from him?     4   ~ * 3    

33. How hath Chrifi offended the Qtakers, that in the lame paid-
on wherein they defire that the late Kings houfes and lands may-be
fold, they put in Chrifts too .2 Will you confefs you have fought a.
gainfl him alfo, and~conquere_d him? Pb: the word Church, K ‘z'rk,~ new
iignifie/s..the Lords houfe. Chrtfi calls the _hqufeof ‘prayer his houlie,-,
Mat. 2 1. I 3. Mar. I I. 17-. Lat. 19-. 46. \V~hy'rm1lt'iCl1tr£fst houfes be re.-
queflred, pull’d down and {old 9 _ . ’ -

34. Is not the place of-aalliemblmg called a Church, I C or. I I, I 7, 1 8,
22. I Ca_r.I4.- 19. . 

' 3 5. Did not Chrifi frequent the Synagogues? 3'01).   I 8. 2o. Mat. 9,3r9,'
And the Apqfllgs, A8‘. 1.3. 14, -1 5.-;Aé?._ I 3.2 r— I 7._Io-- I 8. 19. 26.-— I 9. 8.

3 6. When the jaws moved Chnfi todo a miracle by that argument,
he éuilt us 4 Synagogue, did he blame them 9

37. .15 there any thing in Scripture againft building Synagogues or

I

Qhurches £or  VVor=flii[3 .2‘

    ‘Tile Qgaiierr opinion: corzicer2zi2zgf:zndry other matters. A

, 38. Doth it not appear by many of your books. that you think it very-
necellary in the beginning ofa difpute with. any af1an,concerning you; re.
ligion (85 throughout) to fuppofe your {elves ‘abfolutly infallible “St in the
truth 5 and your Antagonifis to be liers and in errors .> you fay all other
men have a fallible fpitit. Anf. to Harris 1243. 2 I .

3 9. Is not this a fhameful begging of the A, uefiion 2- 3

40. -Whereas youyfaiy, that on dqiibt jdegfe ta be received without. an
i7zfaZIi'é’le're*fiim01ny ( Golia p.8.)_is It11=.iO‘t' ‘very‘fi t‘)‘zouf‘r.ouIc’t prove this infal-
lible tefiimony by fome infallible 'a'rgum“e'nt; Whichtaillrmen in their wits
can underfiand .3 .   y

4 1. Ifthat be true which you fay in your 2 d. "anfwcr to '1‘. Moor p. 2 7.

.  . . ,.(r9)._ .  . .
that what is not i1firhediate"ifrom“~Cod, ttnuli ‘be “literal teachings,r are
not all your teatfhings literal and therefore to be negleéted ; i - 2 ‘
42. is there’ not a falfc .‘Spi.rit infome men as well as a true in others,
and may not the light thatis in yoube darhmfi .>‘ 2 Car. I I. I 3, 14.. Mar.
6.2 3.May notfome men be aéted by the fpirit offalfe-hood, when they
think they arelaétedpby the Spirit of God, as Zea’:/eiah? I King. 2 2. I.
43. ‘Is it very probable that your fpirit, which will not be tryed by
Scripture (as you lay in Truth Defending p. 1 7. and in your anfwer to Clap-
ham) is one of them .9 Seeing that Gold is ever fufpeéted that muff not
come to the Touchlione .2 y
_ 44. [fall your preachers are immediately‘ and extraordinarily infpi-
red by Gods Spirit ( as you pretend) muff not the fpirit be believed to
contradiéthimfelf, fince you contradiét one another 5 as Huhhmham in
his T mths Defemep. I0 I. faith, that the wicked are not to read the Scrip- .
tum 5 and Bmeoagh againfl: Firmyin 12. I6. faith, that mm but the wicked
( fach asscrihes and Pharifees 2) are to read them..     '
i 4 5. VVhereas you fay in your book againft fojh. "Miller cntituled An;
tichrifi in mm 12. 14. that the Scripture will :20: arm one for of the nvorfhip in
Steeplc—houfi’S, will not the Scripture own out devout and attentive read-
ing and Hearing the Scripture there 9
46. Are not you Torry for our affertincr in your book called T mths
Defeizce 4°. p. 98. that Chrifi did not {end orth his difciples to baptife
“ any with water, as the filthydreamers the prielis do, and tell men
“ ’tis an ordinance ofChril’l, who are liars of him 5 for Chrilt did not
“ mention any water to his difciples .2 Contrary to Aét. 8. 38. and I0.
47- ]oh. g. 5. Mat. 28. 9.Eph. .2, 26. I ]oh.—5. 6. , ~
47. If there was in the Apoitles dayes nofuch thing as VVate'r-‘bap-
tifmnvhat was the meaning of being baptized for the dead, 1 Car. 1 5.2 9.
48. Whereas Chrifl: Mat. 2 8. «.1 9. commanded his Apofiles to bap-
tlZ€ all Nations, where do you find children excepted ? _
49. Why do youflgall the dofirine of original {in a foul-deiltroying,
and a God-blafphetiéiing Doétritte .> ~Praud-Pharz'jZ»e repr0L'edp. I 3.
V 50. \/Vhy do you lay that to have prayer before and after Sermon,
and afterward a benediétion of the peopleis a Popifh cufiom,ib. 12. 2 9.
5 1. Do not you hold that neither God the Father, nor the Son, not
the H. Spirit are Pt-rfons, but only operations within you .2
_52. Do not you hold that every one hath a light within him, which
Will convert him from all darkncis if he follow it ,and teach him to wor-
{hip God aright 9 C 2 53. If

   

_ '5 3. If fo, what priviledg had the,1j'z%aelitesabove.other people in haw-A
ingthe writtenlaw .3    “ _   ” 5 i f  
54. May each man in the world know by that light that the Virgin
Mary brought forth achild, and that Chrifi died and ro{e again ,>
5 5. Do you believe hewas born of a Virgin, andnot barely of a \’ir--'
gin mind, as {ome of you {aid neer Lyn when you repeated ; the Creed 3  
56. \/Vhereas you eflem Ettlefinfiitns to_be of equall authority with
Etclefiafies, what do you anfwer to that very plain place that place Ecclm.
4 I . 2 o. Be alhatned ofwhoredom before Father and Mother, of a lie be-
fore aPr(nCe, of hefore the fudge, ofoffente heforei the -Coz2gregatio;¢, of
T heft, (ft. 0ffil€flC€:h€f0Ve them that f nlute thee, and to look upon an knrlotz
57. VVhereas you {ay that Chrift and St. jfazizesiforbid fwearing, is it
not as cleer as the fun by the following words,[1n Mar. 5. 3 4, 3 3, 3.6,
37 . and ]am. 5,] that the oathes which are forbid b.. Chrilt-5 and the A-

‘ pofiles, are only {wearing by the creature zly. Need efly. 31y. Falfely.

Swear not at all, neither hy hetwen, nor hy earth, nor jeruflzlem. ('92,

58 . Do ou fiill think it neceifary that thofe who are the true Mini-
{leis of Chrifi ihould prove themfelves to he {o by wzzndring, having no
cemtin dwelling place Pas E fiztrrangh faith in deceit hroztght to day light)», 2 4.

59. St. Paul faith that where there is no law there it no t2ra,71f,74re/‘]2o;¢ ;
where is the law againfl the trade of a Mufititzn 2 which you, and Hnééerli
thornzperfwaded Ettles to lay afide, contra_fy’to Carr. 7.20. If-IP15.‘ 4_2 g_

6 o. Do ngléyog hold the foul of man to be no part ‘of man-, but the
ver beino o o P 5 .

2 1.‘ Dzh not you 6.1-‘ox and others of you affirm your {elves to be e~
qual W‘lJ!.'\l]] Go? .> Saul: efi;rtZ2a',p. 2. 50. 6.510. Hnlvlerthorn agninfl Sherlock

.30. itnesW..Mnr a ,M.Alt am. ,5 to ' ~
P 62. Have not the Quakers of Sutton in the I/le of Ely confeffed that
there be almoit as many falfities as affertions in what Huhlerthorn ( in
his recorcl of fizfiferings for tythes ) {aith concerning that Town, 12. 4,;fand
is it,not.probable that there is no more truth in his other fiories than in-
that of H. Ward ? Witne{s C.aptai'n Cole and others. ‘

6 3.. Vvhat doth he mean by {aying in the fame record, p. 49, that
there is but a few Magifirates in England that truly fea-res God 2 t

64. Doth not he mean, and. you believe that they only {eat God who
are of your religion ? And that they onely are to be obeyed, who bg-
lieve all that you fay, and do all that you would have thafi 9,

65. D.) you (with Huléeetlwn in the {aid Record ) think that they

- {u cr

 

K 3 I }
fufferfor well-doing Int. 3517. who {ufferfor den '23 ~ tag at ‘ - , \
dfléfled éjldtv, zmdfiites to the ‘Lords: of ellunnors ,2 )1 g P jpfnfb Ml“

Qgtakerm Pra€t’ije.r.
" .6 6. Isitpollible  fomany Jufiices of peace Miniltersi the Gof-

pel and people in the county of Luueafier (as you mention in your Suuls
errand) (hould teflify by their fubfcriptions,that in our meetings little
children are Pcrangely wrought upon in their bodiesfdming at the mouth,
8zc. ( which is a. fign of being pollefi with the Devil Mur.9. 2o. ) if it
were not a truth .3 s

67. But fuppofe that all thefe within the County of Lama/fer did
confpire to belie you Quakers (as ’twas fuppofed in your publick dif-
pute that you lived good lives) yet is it pollible that the Minifiers and
people of Wefimarlund fhould joyn with them in the fame lie, and both
be fo bold as to prefent it to the Camel of State and civil Magiilrates un-

.der their hands.Sec fome depofitions {old by Dau’ at the Gun in IU_y-lame _>

03. Suppofe both Counties had been (0 falfe and impudent, can 6.

-Fox‘. be foimprudent as to print thefe relations and fcandals himfelf

( which he doth in his anfwer to the Weffnzorluud peticions p. 35.)
and not to fay one word againfi them if he were not convinced, that

they were deinonllrably true 9

6 9. Therefore mull: not all ingenuous men believe the Qiakers to be
spollleit by the Devil,till they have as good proof for the negative as thefe
{everall t‘orementiond_petitions and concellions are for the afllrmative .92

7o. Did ever Chrifl or the Apofiles difiurb the Priefls and Miaiiteryf

of their time while they were in their worihip of God, as many of

you do .> ,

7 I. Did Solomon Eules well in entring into Mr. Edm. Culumies pulpit
in Church time, fitting down upon the cufloiau (as he himfelf relates it, 12.2.)
with bisfeet upon t/Jefeut ( where the Priefl, whet: be but}: told out his lies, dot/9

D fit dawn lfirmiug «packet, fa that the People lafl their fang, (7%?

7 2. Did not 7120 Holim of K ettdale go as naked as he was born through
the marketplace at Kiréy Stepbeu on market day 08'. 2 3. faying, ’Tz's
not I éut Godthutgaes naked .2 ( See the witneiles in the 5. Netr-CaflIe-
Minifiers anlwer to f. N. p. 84. ) And do not you abufe places of Scri-
pture to this purpofe, for tho ’tis {aid that Peter» was naked [To/a. 2 I. 7.

yet he had at the fame time a Fiihers coat 3 and David had a linnen 
7 pho ‘

 

C

‘phi onwhen  {aid he We

(9%?  
at =fake<i.‘“ is that na1;eoinH.rs¢.;p.u..;

Y

fignifies thin-» clad.

7 3. Why do you omit tfingingrof Pfalms when you are mergyahavghg

  in Scripture both acommand forit Epb. 5. 1 9.§and example .437, 1 5,2 5.

  74. Why doyou omit prayers when you are afliiéted, contrary to
_’1’z¢m. 5. .13.~a’nd neither, pray before not after youripreachmeiigsa . 3
75,151: not a finiofsomiflion never to give ‘God thanks before and
and after meals, but to fall on jufi like-fwinez 2 ‘ --
76. Why may not you falute People when you go into theirhoufes
otmeet them on the road, when you have both a command, and.€X__
ample for it in Scripture .> Mot. to. I52. and 5. 47. I Sam. 2 5; .14.-and
517. 22. A8‘. 2t. 19. Lz1Ie.‘Io.‘ 5. Pfzzl...'129. 8. Ruth 2. 4    i . 
77. Why are not you fo mannerly as to call your fupetior, Mafier
or Sir, when you fee thefe names givento men both in the old and new
Tefiament ? aseto,Aérol2zmz 17. times, to Eliflqa by the Prophet,2 I<z',—y,
6. 5. to So;4lby‘D.w’id, 'I‘SZ1”m. 24. 6. And in the new tefiament Epla. 5,

‘ 5, 9. Col. 3. 22. I Tiin. 6.‘ I.sf]"*o.b'.i1’2i. 21. A52‘. 7. 26.and 14...: 5. and 16.

go. and 26. 25.and 27. Io,2I,25.Luk. I. 3. . , ,

7 8. Was it not a Ptrange fight to fee the Lord chief«Ba1-on W,'zd(bOth
the firft day of this Term and Nova 1. 1 6 59. )/fare»/J€2zo’m', and twenty
Qmleers about him with tbeiir «bots on, half . an -_hour together _> ' 

79. Is there not a civilworfhip, honour, and.re{pe€t, a.1ldwed‘ ‘by the
holy Ghofi in Scripture, to be given to men on earth ‘.2 zzeoex; 9;'Ley,
19. 92. Prov. 6. 31.  6. 9, 1o, I I. Gen. 41. 43. and 23. 7, I2. 1i”Por.

|

J

2. 17. and.3. 8. Pfol. 15. 4. I Tim. 6. I._- 7

So. Is not the wotd~zbou ufed upoiithree (and. only three ) occafions
in Eoglzzml 5 when we {peak to '-God," ily-T.o an intimate -eqi1al famili-
a1'friend, and 31y. to a bafe feliow 9 and is it not therefore uncivij to
ufie it to any elfe .> efpecially fince ’twas a1-wayes abfurd ( as Erafnzor in
IE5 dialogues obferves )itznfl2Weho1nz"/mrz Aflglzmz, to that; an Englifh mang

8 I. Ifthc Apofile bid us to give lyoieozir to whom honour éelozzgetb, and
ifhonou; be 3 fign 3 how {hall -1 know that you honour any man, unlcfs
you fignifie it by tome outward mark .> ‘ 6

8 2. Was it not a {in ofomiffion in ‘Zoo. Witmzm, a glover, to run a-
way from Stzzrr’2;"idge fair leaving his debts unpaid .2 Fifty {billings being

due from him to Captain 7o.?mCole for his booth, and large fummes to u

the Brewer, Baker, Bu.tcher,and others who are a1lvvitne',Tes, .
83. Is it not very probable that mofi. of yrur Qgake1'——prcachers are
guilty

 

i A e    V \
guilty of the ‘fame crime with I./I/'z':3nzz;z,i defrauding their creditors, pteé
tending to be carried by the -gplrét Int? one COl{Jtflt_V, when they date not
{how their heads in another or eato anfirte W *.> ‘ he '

84. Was it not~a‘fin of commiflioplin fame: Par;¢el,& ‘ehiefpreaiching
Qgakere to {tattle himfelfittColtheflergbalé;  iIi'6:5'9l?“'  e i

8 5. ‘,\7Vhereas falm Gaz'lCorot1er ; fade 73%;» foreman,'j'cfl>pb Smizlz,
(ff. anal you all confefsi Lamétdefezcfe, p. 14.’. ‘that the jury gave it 2'22 upon
them" oat/yes that J-amesPamcl wzlfitlljltflar-ved_ffJzmj%Zfta &l'fZlf_}7,_' that they 4-
greedto this; Mr: tank it 2"», e8zc. Isit not iahfin. or you?’ to ‘putwhim in ‘the’
cmlagmof yourMartyrs‘printedlatelysbyCalvert and to"gtve him the t
lataelt haranae ofany in your lifi .> " ' t   -

82. VVas it hot 21 finein Riclm;f:dVVard of. Newnzarket riot [wear by Goa’;
nvozmcls and divers other dread ull oathes,..m Stuxézigia air 1639.3 who
wasfioéi hisptophanelsapprehended there hy theieCoh>llfab1e, ttlid forced
to pay hfS..muf&‘by .th¢ e Maiote  C4mérz§!g?;l’   Story,thC.
Conli-able and othetsi A i T -‘V j  “ 41' i — . -

£87. IS‘lt hot cenfefled lfIilSdu1$ e.rre;_nd 12; 9.(§1I3€€1i’.2- h7ffim’>‘ gftlflff
a" ollower of 6. Fox ptofe ’ ed himfél t0‘bC 9 @111  F1  5?“ .g3V<’é
outpropheciesgiziaéthat the~d2i of judgetnent lhgoul-d_. ~l;>e_ion th.e"1_'5. of  
Noveméeaalnd that there lhoul never lit judg¢*atALrW.l1fl€V agauz; - '

88; VVas7it“t_1ot ha fin in yoiiti Btothe’r Gzéem‘ at ' C5'W‘Tfi”. . 35’ “"7 1%” '
Bisérauzzlneer Béetkam to commit buggery with ':1}_«m_ate. dVV1{tnefs Zlmm
Banks and R. Clark: Wife of Beetbamg who both 0 F erd to, epo C it.
b  Was it nota {in ‘in Clariflagi/vei¥i.»1rIei';7fvi?j7(jf<i%QW¢‘_iPr%3Ch§r€915!

o om4compai1io11‘to Gear e,VV/Jitéfzezzclt),'to‘CQ1?'11T1it“__.; agent“ ornrcauoxl
with llrjitla fefvatjfto "1; I§a:gSj77t0nd5,’aS'bOth  and‘ me Confeflied‘ before
thc Major of Norwirb .> i . . .  ' ‘ _

90. Did not the fame Azki7zfoz_2__ {:1 in running away from Nortvzch
ga-ole 5941.4. ;555 (for which_'_¢au’7fe,th1_1'~;_ €1_flfi"C£}’lS fem: after him )
and ittcat _"nir‘éLvvziv theneegoodé which are,piot':htseoM1i? ~ ' i
hit 9~L.D1' - nb;f_f_'1ée"”'fa;ne.Ai/ei72]3}z;‘aftef he’hl211c¥.'ptofeFl’ed rlepentfiicctla {gr
‘'5 lewclnefs VV;‘ltlTZ£.rfiula' ptaétilel greater ‘Vl any at 1; 1e rm ca e t e
George in Tbzmoni, fix miles from Norwich .> See the relation of thefe
matters , rint,edfor Fr4nkllin,?and,at;¢f?§Cl bY:§hC M3301‘ Of 9VW"I7-.

A 92; idrhott B.;gfl9:a[j cmi;’1e1_1te,‘,.Qaal<_c; atid Mallet at ]Sa.tér;«{§e—
worth finitt: meafilring corn when he bought .1’: Wlthgn hOllfiWhfi1'1(-'k331;d
witha convex when he fold the fame,“ as was prove again im at t LC
Q"1a—rtCr-{€l7fiOfiS in Hartford lat} flflirflvéicfmflf -1 5 S 9- _

 C24)  
93. Did not folm Rockwell fin in telling Mr. Lion of Saéridgmytz,

that he had not finned thefe 7 years, when °tis commonly known he got.

his ma/id with child within thefe 4.or5.years.3,  

. .94. Can you name any fineither Ofgamifiian or ca_2.2zmi_/flbzré, that om"

eminent preacher iQ1aker:_or other hath not been notorioufly guilty of 9

9 9 5. -Did, your triends (who were about goo) Quakers fin, who
( Aug. 2 8. a 1:6 5 9. ) feized in an hofiile manner upon the watch at S4-
éridgewort/rfii Hartfardjloire, which was fer by the conllableg who had
his authorityfrom, Sr. Tho. Hewit ( kinfman to the L. FLEE TVVOOD,
General) ]ul’ti_ce of peace’ then in comtniflion (from the Parlz'amem) as
he had been for io.years without interruption gwho appointed the watch
( as it was then in molt great townes ) chiefly becaufe the Quakers com-
plained to him that they had been abufed ? 9  

9 6. Was it not a fin in thofe Qiakers there and then to difarme ( or
caufe to be difarmed) all the watchmen, to firike-t fome of them down
fo that one of them {pit bloud, to thrufi his Ladyes cozzcbmm into the
body in three places,to fer a pillol to his breall,to let upon Sr.‘T.Hewit as
he was coming peaceably from the publiclt fervice of God gand to commit
divers other infolencies upon his Lady and children by reproachfull.
language. 8cc'.h>VVi‘tnefsi flan Carter, and many others of Saéridgewortb.

. 97. Do not you own two books,‘ entituled Some tonfideratians, and ad

fiandardfet up; And do not they Pcir up Englifb men to ad Munfler bulinefs .>

9 8. Did not falm Wells tell Sr. T ho. Hewit, before the commiffioners
for the militia, that he was the greatefi fellon in Hartfbrdfbire ,9 And
the fame day ride after him,and tell him  was lent by the Commiflio-
nets to command Sr..T. H ewit back again, faying he had told the-Com-

' miflioners a lie) when the Commiflioners did not {end him to sr,7_ H?

99. Is it probable that Qlakers think it unlawful (as you plead) to take
any oath, when T ha. Bufla and divers ofthefe about Saéridgenaortb have de-
liberately taken oaths before the Magiftrate, yet were and are Quakers 2
9 I oo. Are not fundry of thole eminent Qlakers who worfhip the
Devil perlonally appearing at Sheréurn in Dorcet[hire,and commandino‘
them to renounce their baptifme which they received at the Font?   O

Laflly, becaufel believe you’l be apt to fay that fome of rhefe who profeffc

to worlhi p Beclzelmb are not Q1_1akers,I‘pr‘ay tell me(fi‘nc‘e you have no Sacra.
ments to diflinguifli you from other folk, as all other Religions have ) how I
{hall know thofe that be,O3akers from thofc that be not?That if I have here-
in called any by that name who are none of you ( which I think I have not)
I and all others that deal with you may diflinguiflt better hereafter.

WA — 

BX
7734
.A2
.S54

N&fl-OQIXA

umuum
ELL SPC RRE RARE

IIllllllafliiiiliilimllflIll
01 0-005936721