E}? CONGRESS M lll 0 9 uIIIIIii1'I'"°i7m°uia CONGRESSIONAL °1°'1 RESEARCH SERVICE LIBRARY OF issouri - Colu I lllllllllll 3 3926 bia MT. ST; HELENS: AN ASSESSMENT ISSUE BRIEF NUMBER IB80066 AUTHOR: Perri , Karl a Environment and Natural Resources Policy Division THE LIBRARY OF comcnzss CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE MAJOR ISSUES SYSTEM DATE oE1sINATED Q§4g§4§Q DATE UPDATED gggggggg %FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CALL 287-5700 0912 CRS- 1 IB80066 UPDATE-09/09/80 0 ;§§vB-2§-;§;2;9n esouthwestern Washington State showed renewed signs of activity for the 4inoticeable bulge of rock grew on the north flank of the mountain. into the sky. .’27, a series of stronger quakes occurred, volcano in first time in 123 years, with earthquakes and some steam activity. Then on March and steam and ash spewed 10,000 ft. In late Harch 1980, at. St. Helens, a sno-capped dormant into the air. During April and May, earthquakes and volcanic activity continued and a On Sunday, May 18, a monstrous explosion tossed almost a cubic mile of ash 60,000 ft. Hot mudflows, flash flooding, death, major destruction of the surrounding forests due to airblast, and possible damage to crops, livestock, and fish and wildlife resulted. Scientists and government officials were ‘:‘examining and estimating the depth and scope of the initial destruction when covered the southwest 12, a second major eruption, the next Sunday, may 25, portion of the state with ash. The third major eruption occurred June y,with a burst of ash and steam that rose 52,000 feet in the air, hurling a new _ Washington. As of June 16, damage is estimated to exceed 2.7 billion s‘dollars. fl;Ragree92z2-;§2.29L;2z.AzAL1§;§ at. St. Helens is one of a chain of volcanoes in the Cascade Mountain 3 Range, extending from northern California through Oregon and Washington, to southwestern British Columbia. All the volcanoes have long periods of downpour of volcanic ash across northwestern Oregon and southwestern dormancy, punctuated with shorter periods of activity. The most recent major volcanic activity in this chain occurred at Lassen Peak, California, in 1914 -- although Ht; Baker in northern Washington and Ht. Hood, east of Portland and only 40 miles southeast of Ht. St. Helens, have emitted steam Lflfintermittently during the past several years. Located in the Gifford Pinchot National Forest in the Cascade Mountain Range, 40 miles northeast of Portland, Oregon, Mt. St. Helens overlies a volcanic center that was formed 37,000 years ago. The most active and explosive period has been within the last 4,500 years, involving" hot 3 pyroclastic flows (masses of hot rock fragments) that can travel at speeds of Qiwhich move to considerable distances at high speeds. iT;last period of activity for Mt. St. Helens ended 123 years ago and up to 100 mph —— incinerating people and objects within a matter of seconds W as far as 6 miles from the base of the mountain - and lava flows (molten “?rock) which tend to appear after an eruption has been in progress - for days or weeks -- rather than during the first part of the eruption. These activities can then trigger mudflows (a mass of water-saturated rock debris) The chief danger to human life would be burial by ash, sudden impact from large boulders swept along in the flooding stream, and possible severe burns from the rock. The coincided along the San Andreas created Spirit Lake ‘by with (but was not correlated to) a major earthquake f'u1t in California. That Mt. St. Helens outburst ,,d xming a valley with ash and rock; the explosion on May 18« destroyed the lake. Because of the long history of spasmodic explosive activity, geologists Crandall and Hullineaux of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) l;reported in 1971 that at. st. Helens was -- CR5“ 2 W IB3G066 UPfifiTE*09/09/30 an especially dangerous volcano -- more active and explosive than any other volcano in the coterminuous “United States...violent and intermittent eruptions [are] a near certainty e-that will not her possible to prevent or stop once they ' begin - affecting human life and health, property, agriculture, and general economic welfare over a broad area. Efforts to determine the numerous kinds of impacts of the volcanic ’ ‘eruption began immediately after the major event on Bay 18. Numerous Federal and State agencies undertook analytic programs, butt these are unlikely to provide-definitive answers for some time. The second major eruption on may »“‘25 and the third major eruption on June 12 drastically curtailed research efforts, both for reasons of safety and because of priority actions necessary _.to protect people and property in local areas. The following analysis fffdiscusses preliminary reports on geological assessments of volcanic debris,i air and water quality, health effects, timber, fisheries, agriculture and & land use, and disaster-assistance programs. Qeelggieel-_A§§e_=-zene.r;2:.§-2f_!9l.<;ee;2.2shLie (James E. Hielke, Science Policy-Research Division, 287-7031) Volcanic ash rarely contains enough toxic material to seriously ydamage plants and animals. The mineral matter itself is relatively inert“ and the wg:worst effects seem to be the physical nuisancey and possible respiratory problems. In areas of heavy ash fall, the physical nuisance is considerable, affecting human safety and the operation of cars, farm machinery, and other iieguipment. Fine particles of volcanic glass and rock dust are irritating to respiratory systems and can aggravate existing health problems such as emphysema. Geochemically, the fine-grained material is a renewed source of 'f;trace elements and mineral nutrients normally found in the soil in the area. The plume from the first cataclysmic eruption followed the upper-level jet .v stream northeasterly across Washington, northern Idaho, and western Montana. It then curved southeast, spreading out as it moved across Wyoming toward __Nebraska and Kansas, then continuing east across the northeastern 0.5. The coarsest ash particles, measuring 60 to 100 microns in diameter, fell within 100 miles of the volcano. The average weight of the ash material ranged from 40 to 60 microns in diameter, and was present in heavy amounts as far east as ilwestern Hontana, where two inches-was reported. As much as 4-6 inches of ash was deposited across parts of central and eastern Washington. The finest ash 1 particles, on the order of one micron, remain in the atmosphere. In additional problem related to ash geochemistry is primarily generated from the associated volcanic gases: The most abundant gas given off is water ‘vapor; however, various proportions of other gases are often present. These . are carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, sulfur trioxide, hydrogen sulfide, hydrochloric acid, and hydrofluoric acid, all of which are mg harmful to plants and animals when present in sufficient. concentration. Sulfur oxides, for example, combine with water to give sulfurous and sulfuric acid. These gases, probably in the form of acids, adhere to the surface of __the ash particles and accumulate where the ash is deposited. In an exceptionally severe case, such as the eruption of Irazu ind Costa Rica in CRS- 3 IB80066 UPDATE—09/09/80 1963-1965, the ash was so acidic (pH lower than R) that it produced acid Hurns on plants and corroded metals. To date, acidity has not been a significant problem in the ash fall from Hount St. Helens although very acidic conditions have been observed locally in the plume from the eruption. iW;§limatis-§f_§si§ (John Justus, Science Policy Research Division, 287-7014) major volcanic eruptions can emit vast amounts of dust, ash, and cinders iinto the atmosphere. The largest eruptions are even capable of injecting enough material into the stratosphere (10 to 30 miles altitude) to generate a 5°fglobe-girdling veil of volcanic dust. The dust can attenuate as much as a‘ few percent of the solar radiation reaching the Earth's surface for several N years in succession, possibly causing a globally averaged cooling of the i“*atmosphere on the order of several tenths of a degree Celsius. ‘ The dust released by at. St. Helens has created devastation locally on the riland, and its fallout from the lower atmosphere has covered the land in." several northwestern States. In terms of its effect in the atmosphere, this ejection of debris is relatively modest and is expected to have negligible Hiimpact on climate. Preliminary estimates of materials released range up to a few cubic kilometers.’ Lr_92aliL1 (maria Grimes, mnnvironment and Natural Resources Policy Division, y 237-7253) The volcanic debris that has been emitted into the atmosphere essentially consists of coarse particulate matter and clouds of minute dust. Once o:.airborne, these particles may remain in the stratosphere for years, or they may drift downward into the troposphere, adversely affecting_ air quality. The smaller particles may contain a variety of harmful chemical substances that could pose short- and long-term health hazards. The Clean Air Act (P.L. 95-95), as amended, addresses pollution from manmade sources. Consequently, there are no provisions for indemnification of persons whose health has been { harmed by exposure to air pollutants resulting from natural processes. By collecting samples of ash and monitoring atmospheric change, the USGS and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) have issued some preliminary assessments of the initial ash fall. , The agencies have determined that the volcanic ash is only slightly acid ‘ or is neutral, thereby contributing very little acidity to the prevailing air quality. Subsequent analysis, however, may detect concentrations of p.fluorides, chlorides, sulfates, trace metals, and chemical compounds that are more acidic and more toxic. USGS and NCAA have also found that ash contains considerable amounts of free silica, some types.of which are known to cause _t: -icosis. A complete evaluation of the risk of short-term exposure is not yet available. The agencies’ initial analyses indicate that the amount of ash to which the general population is being exposed is unlikely to pose a significant health hazard. Conversely, the Environmental Protection Agency hi(EPA) is concerned about the continuing exposure to a large volume. of cns— u IB80066 UPDATEé09/09/80 particles less than 2.5 microns in size that are airborne in areas in thr Northwest. These respirable particles reenter the ambient air and are groun 7'feven finer by moving vehicles; they are dispersed again by the prevailing 0 winds, thereby perpetuating the problem. On nay 26, the EPA, in Washington State, issued a statement cautioning the . public that a‘ surgical mask or scar may not be adequate to prevent ywqinhalation of the fine particulate matter. On June 16, the agency's Portland '::office declared an air pollution warning, alerting persons susceptible to air pollutants to stay indoors. The alert lasted two weeks. , Industry is voicing concern that the volcanic emissions could be * sustainable and long-lasting enough to throw. many clean air areas into , nonattainment, closing them to economic growth. Under present Clean Air Act ’"Iprovisions, no options may be available should these emissions of L particulates, and possibly of sulfur oxides, add enough to background air _ pollution levels to violate ambient air quality standards directly, or exceed V 5fi7pernissible levels when industrial emissions are added. Following the June 12 eruption, National Semiconductor Corp. decided against building a m$70 million plant near Portland. Kevin Kelly of Portland's 0.5. National. Bank "inoted that semi-conductor manufacturers, one of the driving forces of ‘ Portland's economy in the past five years, requirer clean-room technology. _ Companies will look elsewhere if they’ cannot be assured a dust-free q 0 7296) on may 23, President Carter flew over the volcanic site~ and surrounding area, and pledged disaster assistance to States immediately affected by the 1 volcanic fallout. Under the Disaster Relief Act of 1970 (P.L. 93-288), the Z_ President has the authority to provide relief to alleviate emergency situations resulting from hurricanes, tornadoes, mudslides, volcanic eruptions, tidal waves, and other natural disasters, through a special nfemergency relief fund. ’ The Act is designed to streamline bureaucratic processes that are \,nnecessary to provide immediate funds to State and local governments, as well as to individuals. The special fund expands the authority of the Federal Energency management Agency (PEMA) to coordinate relief efforts by ysdistributing funds to agencies responsible for providing disaster assistance, in addition to the funds annually appropriated to each individual agency for emergency assistance. The nature and scope of the disaster together , determine which types of assistance are available and ~which will be authorized. v FEHA has provided the President and Congress with a preliminary estimate The initial response approved by the House and currently honey 7 equipment : inadequate H of theses’ Preliminary damage * CR5-13 IB80066 UPDATE-O 9/09/80 dbefore the Senate allocates $925 million for relief: $210 million for FEHA xssistance; $2u0 “to the Army Corpse of Engineers; $150 million for cransportation; $500,000 to the- Small Business Administration; and the remaining amount is allocated to various agency relief programs. Under FEHA, two types of assistance are available: public assistance and 0 individual and family assistance. Public assistance can be distributed to a any legal entity, such as a city, township, regional, or State government; ' Funds are provided to clear debris from public .and private, property, tovi provide protection for life and property, to repair and replace aroads, to , engage in water control (dikes, river channelization), to repair and replace "°public buildings, to restore‘ public property that may have been under construction at the time the disaster occurred, and to repair and replace municipal equipment and public utilities; The monies issued under P.L. 'Wl93—288 to legal entities are categorical grants of‘ 100% - that is, they 0 require no repayment. Individual and family assistance is provided under the Disaster Relief Act 7 through rent-free temporary housing for one year to inhabitantsi whose homes were completely destroyed. minimum damage allotments are available to if homeowners for repair, for disaster unemployment assistance, as low interest * loans to small businesses and farms, and to»repair or replace real property. The Individual and Family Grant program permits FEHA to loan up to $5,000 to 1 ”those who cannot meet other requirements to»qualify for loans. In this case I the monies FBHA provides must not exceed 75% of the total anticipated costs. In addition to assistance provided by FEHA, the following assistance is railable from USDA to provide relief to the agricultural and timber sector. However, information is still being developed on the current status of iCffunding availability. In_the short term, USDA can expend pfunds from the a various emergency programs; however, in the long term, programs such as community facility loans and forestry assistance are subject to congressional ’,lappropriations. A9ri22;£2;al_§§a2i1iza$192.2 Q.Q22§e§za£i2u.§e£!i2e.lAS §l 1) §gg;ggggy_§ggd_ggQg;gg --Available if a livestock owner suffers a loss "yin feed supplies of 40% or more. 2) §e£d-2£e§erxa2i2g-auQ.£esésrai2- Qeuafion Broqraa “ Feedqrains are available to farmers following a natural disaster when it is apparent livestock would perish without assistance. 3) §Q§-9ha2:er_lgris9l:2ral-A2:_2£-12£2 - Funds are available immediately to make loans to farmers for wheat and other commodities. 4) §gg;ggggy_§gg§ervation P;gg;§g_j§ggL —- Limited .to soil and water 0’ conservation activities. Funds have been distributed for FY80. A Additional funds are not available until appropriated. 5) ;9£i22l222al-§9u§e£vatien P£29£au_lA§£l -—-ACP funds may be used for 9 during conservation practices. Funds have been distributed for FY80. ,iL Aitional funds may be available when appropriated. CBS-TU A IB30066 UPDATE-09/O9/80 0 1) Q;§g§ggg_§ggrgengy Program -‘ Available immediately to an establishef ,_farmer who has suffered a production loss of 20% or more or a substantial ' physical loss. Each applicant may receive up to $500,000 actual loss loan per disaster. 2) §g9gggig_§mggggggy_g;gg;gg_1§§L - Available to farmers who cannot get » loans elsewhere. Loans are limited to $fl00,000. s 3) §g;;_ggggg§hip_g;Qggag,(F0) - Lomg-term estate loan funds available to a family—size operator unable to get a loan.elsewhere. Each applicant may W receive a loan of up to $200,000 insured or $300,000 guaranteed. 4) gp_e_ggti.gg_Lggg_g_1_:9gg_am -- Available immediately. Each -applicant may F receive a loan of up to $100,000 insured or $200,000 guaranteed. a S) §gJ;.;.__§._1;d_§§t_e_g_g_r_qg1_:_a_;__(§i_i)_ -Available immediately to improvep and Myrestore farmland and water; not limited to family farms. 6) ;;;iggtigg_ggg_Q;aigggg_g;gg;gg - Available immediately for irrigation _ and drainage construction and repair to an association of farmers gunable to a f‘get a loan elsewhere. i 1:9r2§§-Serz__ice-_l§§). 1) gggp_§ggg§§;y_A§§i§tgggg - Available immediately for fire-prevention "W assistance, tree—seedling, technical assistance, and insect and disease detection, upon consultation with StateiForester. There are no limitations “tor eligibility requirements. 2) gggp_;gg_§g§9;ggmggt - Available immediately to support local law Wgenforcement officials on national forest lands with no restrictions or twlimitations. ‘ ‘ 3) §ggg;g;_§ighggy_Ag§_Q§_1958 - Available for emergency road and bridge ue7repairs when a disaster is declared. This is restricted to Federal roads; States and counties can apply directly to the Department of ‘Transportation p (nor) . u) g;ggg_Qggt;g;_ggt_g§_1g§Q -— Available immediately to alleviate erosion and protect water quality with no limitations or restrictions; however, the =Q Soil Conservation Service will need to respond. §mg§g§ggy_§g§g;§h§g_g;Q§gg§igg -— Available immediately to prevent erosion \tnwhen the Secretary of Agriculture determines that it is necessary to safeguard lives and property from flood and drought. Fi§h_;=..e iee P.L. 96-262, signed by the President on June 5, 1980, amends Section Q(b) \;of the Commercial Fisheries Research and Development Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-309) to increase authorization to $5 million per fiscal year to assist a fl State in which there has been a commercial fishery failure due to a resource disaster caused by natural or undetermined causes. Honey can be made cns-15 IB80066 iupnnrn-09/09/30 available in the form of grants to help restore the affected resource and iishery. Funds have not been appropriated under this authorization since FY70. Instead, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEBA) has advanced funds to the National Harine Fisheries Service for disaster’ assistance in fisheries with the provision that Mariner Fisheries request supplemental, ’5”appropriations to cover the disaster assistance and to reimburse wnnn $69 ; fundsiadvanced- §2e;;-§2§iee§§_A§uini§tre&i2e_1§§AL 1. P.L. 91-606 was authorized to revise and expand Federal programs for a relief from the effects of major natural disasters. Those who suffer f economic loss can apply to the SBA. $55,000 is available on home property ' losses, and $500,000 is available to businesses for loss due to closure or i physical damage; Each loan can be amended to cover losses experienced with each additional eruption. I LEEISLAEIOE H.R.i7u38 (Sebelius) \i Establishes the Mount St. Helense National Honument in the State of ’ Washington. Introduced May 22, 1980; referred to Committee on Interior and , Insular Affairs. 2 H53. 735“ (Beaver) Hount Saint Helens Timber Salvage and. Market Stability Act of 1980. winxpedites the recovery and rehabilitation of land in and around the Gifford n,Pinchot National Forest. Introduced May 28, 1980. Hearing ‘held June 12, 1980, before the Forests subcommittee of the House Committee on Agriculture. 3.3. 75n2 (Whitten) Supplemental appropriations for FY80. Includes iprovisions. for disaster assistance to Ht. St. Helens. House approved a version on June 19, 1980, f_authorizing $784 million. Bill referred to>Senate June 25, 1980, and amended to increase the amount to $952,100,000. ” 232929206! 0? EvEn2§ 06/18/80 - 06/26/80 - The casualty lis- uGvLQLCu 25 persons dead and 45 missing. Although the immediate economic damage proved less extensive than it first appeared, the long—term picture looks discouraging. Several national corporations have decided against proposed plant construction and the wide national publicity is having a negative effect on tourism in the area. 06/18/80 - pThe lava dome was 660 ft. in diameter and 280vft. high. 06/16/80 -- A small lava dome within theecrater was spotted; this may indicate a less-highly explosive stage in the volcanic sequence. « 06/12/80 05/26/80 05/25/80 05/23/39 05/21/80 05/18/80 005/10/80 05/08/80 05/00/80 0%/25/80 04/11/80 04/09/80 CBS-16 IB80066 UPDATE-09/09/80 Mt. St. Helens erupted for the third time, blowing steam and ash 50,000 ft. into the sky. The U.S. Forest Service issued an ash warning for the Portland—vancouver area asking residents to remain inside, but to wear masks if they needed to go out. Scientists warned that the mountain could remain volatile for months or years. Earthquake activity continues. . — Mt. St. Helens erupted for the second time in eight days, engulfing southwest Washington State in an 8—mile-high stream of ash. At this point damage was estimated to exceed 1.6 billion dollars. President Carter visited the volcanic site; he commented that the cost of the disaster is of such magnitude that it will require a special appropriation by Congress. The President and the Secretary of Agriculture will extend, until June 30, wheat loans to Oregon, Washington, Hontana, and Idaho that were due to expire may 31. Governor Dixie Lee Ray declared Washington to be in a state of emergency. water temperatures in the Toutle and Cowlitz rivers killed many fish. Flash floods and future eruptions threatened area residents. at. St. Helens had a major eruption, bloing off the top 1300 ft. of the mountain, sending volcanic ash and steam approximately 60,000 feet into the air. Six people were reported killed and 29 were reported missing; earthquakes registered north as far as Vancouver, Canada, and south as far as Boseburg, Oregon. at. St. Helens in the second stage of a volcanic eruption blasted away the throat of the crater, and triggered tremors, a sign which precedes a major fiery eruption. The north flank of the mountain‘, continued to bulge at a rate of ll to 5 feet daily. at. St. Helens continued with moderate activity. Scientists and geologists debated whether to continue _funds for volcanic observations. 0.5. Geological Survey reported that the bulge on Mt. St. Helens had grown 250 feet high; earthquake activity was recorded. . Lodgers returned to Mt. St. Helens area. Scientists warned that lava eruption was still possible. at. St. Helens was jolted by U earthquakes within four hours registering from fl.0 to n.5 on the Richter scale. 03/31/80 --04/08/80 —- Dave Endicott, a University of Washington geophysicist, noted an average of 75 earthquakes per day equal to or greater than 3.0 Richter. Two newly CBS-17 IB80066 UPDATE—09/09/80 formed craters became a single large crater attaining an overall size of 1700 ft. across and 850 ft- deep. A major eruption was anticipated; national guard and State and local authorities patrolled tourists near the volcano.» A ‘O3/28/80 —— A second explosion occurred at approximately 3:00 a.m. By nid—afternoon, at least a dozen explosions occurred as ash and steam began to drift eastward. 03/27/80 - A formal hazard alert was issued to State, local, and Federal officials. At 12:36 p.m., Mt. St. Helens erupted for the first time in 123 years, spewing steam and ash about 10,000 ft. into the air. Geological forces continued to reshape the mountain as the south side of the summit continued to crack and‘ expand. » 03/20/80 - The first significant earthquake in a swarm of quakes that preceded the surface eruption, one week later, was recorded at a magnitude of u.1 Richter. 03/18/80 - 0.5. Geological Survey geologists Dwight R. Crandell and Donald R. nillineaux, after a decade of study, reported that at. St. Helens is a dangerous volcano likely to erupt within the next one hundred years, perhaps before the turn of the century- (iii .a.22I_1;92;I.-.I:.E.z§n.§n<.:1s.-§9y.s§§§ Crandall, D.R. and Donal Hullineaux. Potential hazards from future eruptions of Mt. St. Helens Volcano. 1978. Washington: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1383-C. Eicher, George J. Jr., and George A. Rounsefell.p Effects of lake fertilization by volcanic activity on abundance of salmon. Limnology and Oceanography. 2(2): 70-76 (1957). Gribbon, John. Forecasts, famines and freezes; climate and man's future. New York, Walker and Company, 1976. 132 p. Hughes, Patrick. American weather stories. Washington, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1976. 116 p. Schneider, Stephen H. The Genesis strategy; climate and global survival. New York, Plenum Press, 1976. 419 p. Stonmel, Henry and Elizabeth. ‘The year without a summer. ' Scientific American, v. 200, no. 6, June 1979: 176*186. fiarrick, Richard. A. Volcano hazard in the United States: research assessment. monograph»#NSF-RA-E-75-012, Institute of Behavioral Science University of Colorado, Boulder, 1975- LIBRARY { OF { WASHINGTON UNIVER-SET‘! ST. LOU’J$ - .’r‘fiC‘9. .—-gout