DR E 33 \, A :1 EL IT} TH EDsTms,% A;rVi>HILADEI»PHIAoN VA ‘y .‘ \ % ,V'W;t'rHV TI7IE'CHIEF RESOLUTIONS V on THE 6 I#"1‘S‘CONSTIf1.‘U-. %IN_;A;N1}%;LIs‘1f%%o~F ?0FF.IcERs%,%A:Np,,1n*sVi2Ro'rEsT‘ AGAINSIA jw A * ‘%1*ma*sHtm‘TmGoFTHE1:~II.. I D. Y. KILIGORE, I A A RAH. S.VVILLIAI\/IS. WA A AA , ‘ sEXECUTIVE...C,OMMITf1‘EE., "A . AD. IKILGORE, C/raznaaa, Pennsylvania ; * S. I. MATHEWS, Arkan~ AI sa.S; AL. HATCH, California; E. B.-IIAZZEN, ConnecAti.cut;f S.jS. WALL-A-I A LIHANA,AAco1Aorac1o; I-IARWOOD G. DAv,A,Iowa-,4 HERMANN LIEHER, Indiana; ROBERT JQAINGERSOLL, Illinois; , J. E. WALLACE, Louisin ~ Aa.;.MONROEI A. BLANCHARD, MIa.iI1e;A A. WARRENL3AI{EL5E,Y,A . , ~.iSsouriA; FRANK5 J- MEAD, ‘M'inneSOta.A; IVVILLIAIMI LITTLE, NeAwA A “ pshirej; LORENZAOV,VV.ABILLIINGSL'EY,INebraSka.; GEORGLEAWIAAL-AII‘IA I THQRNE, NorthCarO1in3~3 AGEOARC-E LEWIS, Rhodelsland; . , A RASOAN, Texas ;, ‘AISAMLUELI-WATSLON, Tennessee; AABAR-jAClA Wisc0Psin~I. . . .. . A I EINANOAE COMMITTEE. A , I ' 8 Pem&e7”z‘rm, S gzaare, .Ba.s'toI42z._.A A . A _. S“; WILLIAMS, CIm'3ram,a4 Temoxo Place, Boston. 9 a .A . ,. In V PATRIOTIC ADDRESS p A h I I on THE to it : NATIONAL LIBERAL LEAGUE I L, s _A To THE , H l I I>EoI>LEroE THE ‘UNITED STATES. T in T H Adopted on the Fourth of J uly, 1876. T j I I I PHILADELPHIA, July 4, 1876.. iFELLoW—CITIz,ENs :-—-—- T p T I , I I I , Assembled in convention inthis historic city and onthis historic day, we, I the members. of the National Liberal League, offer you our “sympathetic T I congratulations on the completion of the first hundred years of the existence of our common country as one of the great nationsof the earth. With you, , we rememberin profound gratitude the toils, sacrifices, and achievements of 1 our forefathers; with you,‘ we pay a tribute of deep veneration to the patri» A otism, vthe self-abnegati~on, the valor, the statesmanship, the ‘wisdom, the I I resplendent virtues and thewonder£u1abiliti_es which were the trueIfountain- T head of our national betingf with you, We exultingly commemorate the speak- ing of that bold word which a century ago launched into human history the first great political proclamation of the natural rights of man, and electrified theworld withthat sublime”Declar__ation of Independence which, has made I‘ the Fourth of July one of the deathless festivals of mankind- we share in p T the universal outburst of joy," and pride which has hailed with the shouts j of ' forty rejoicing'millions~the rising of this day’s sun. p ' pi , I 1 5 h , In full sympathy, therefore, with the spirit of this lgrandtoccasion and the T spirit of those Whose noble passion for liberty made it grand, we respectfully _ address youon a theme closely connected with their” herpic, and immortal. ; labors. The doininantpurpose of their hearts and_the proud .achiev‘ement ‘ , of their hands were the foundation of a free coinmonfwealth on the s~eZ_/‘1wz'a7.{37zz‘ it ~ Wegzm;lz'2j/lqfi all mm with respect in their 1za2fzzraZ“rz;.g'ln‘s. The Constitution, , A MEEWIN-0.7 2—.F;12 5 which withconsummate sagacity they framedfor the execution of this purpose rests on no: other basis; it was ordainedand~ established in the name of "‘- the I T people ofthe United‘ States,” and inno other name; it speaks bythetcol--_ elective authorityofl all the individuals who compose “tlie people” ;”it rec=og-,- h T nizes the will ofA“thej_ pelople,” carryin h gt into effect the ‘dictates of their V p natural ‘reason and natural conscience, as the ultimate source and origin, of all political power. No one man, "no"one class of men, can show any Anaturall i right to rule the rest, except the right which is A 7¢zz:glz:,- and that 'right}7is[j P V Atyranny, usurpation, immorality, wrong. From this absoluteabsence A naturallright to rule mankind, whether as lodged in one or Ainfa A£ew,g1:estt1tsA T the »:eZf—e“z/z'a’zmt eqzmlzijr of all. men in the» right tof“‘life, ,1iberty,g.; pursuit of happiness.’’, That magnificent and Iinspiring~principle;is” ” it AA Apo,tA_tl1”e IDe‘claration of IndependeAnce,Aand' the Clonstitution tojwlui T T . mately led: it was the soul of the Revolutionary,‘War,lhas been ‘ 1 «all our subsequent history, "and williihe‘5thfi ,~so5 1 of all our futuh‘ J Strike o~u,t’of thecfunpdamental law of the llétndh this recognitio , ~'uz';Zzaa,ZAArz:gZzts,iAtand, before another hundred, years. s,h‘a11,ha A lprofudt Ifabric of the , republic wills have crumbled into , iimpalhpj K It _. 1-A~ A,, ,_ Now a free Commonwealth thus conceived and established, a national I , [Constitution thus framed and ordained, presupposethe separation of Church and State; -they can exist only by virtue of this principle; they must perish j if ever this principle should be abandoned‘. As an abstraction,it has become a stereotyped phrase of American politics,,a mere truism which nobodyidis- H i putes, a mere tradition which it is the fashion to pass from month to mouth and not examine too closely in its bearings on existing usages or institutions. , ~ l Wliat does it mean? Thatthe naturallintelligence and moral sense of ‘man. kind, no matter what may be their views on the subject of religion, are ade- l quate to all the proper purposes, functions, and powers of civil government; ‘that it is never necessary to stepvoutside of the circle of natural human i faculties “ in order. to form a more erfect union establish 'ustice insure i l 2 J a domestic tranquillity, provide for the common defence, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of“ liberty to ourselves and our posterity,” These are the objects, and the onlyones, which the Constitution was framed and ‘ordained to secure; and the principle of the separation of Church and C 1 State means that they can be secured by the faculties which inhere in simple l humanity, as such, --—nay, more, that they will be defeated by permitting the _ y a Church to interfere. with the workings of a civil government based on faith , in the szgfifciavzgz of these universal and natural liurnan faculties to protect all the interests of society. Such a government as this is a purely secular one; that is, it confines itself strictly to the secular objects above enumerated, and rernands the whole subject of religion to thepeople in their individual capacity. It can establish no national Church and have no national religion; it favors none,’ it persecutes none, it recognizes none; it deals only with the political interests of the people, and has nothing todowith their a religious interests further than to mainytain their religious liberties and protect ‘_ their equal. religious rights. , That is what the principle of total separation of? Church and State means; and that is the general theory taken for granted it ineveryline of our national Constitution. Without it, there could be-no i 7“ government of the people, by the people, for the people”; without it the l , liberties of the individual, the natural rightsof man, would vanish altogethen So long as the State exists by the solewill of the people, he petopleis liber‘-l i I ties: are self-pro.tected_ and therefore safe; butlso soon as it becomes in any degree, directly or indirectly, dependent on the Church, the peop1e’s_l.iberties l i in that same degree must depend -on the will of those who govern the ;Church. > r sWhat_ifate“ in that. case awaits , the »p;eople’s liberties, history with te«r1;il;f;lei‘ plainness tells. ] * l l i i S S i ~ [It is leniinently fitting, therefore, on ,this,_ great day of the nation’s. Centen-C ‘nial year,to recur to the fundamentalprinciple of the Constitution, andto s address to you our plea for a_ higher fidelityto it; The. duties it imposes on the people with respect to. the better protection of equal rights in religion 1 are too little heeded or understood ;. andthe public dangers which fiowlfrom ‘ l this neglect areso grave, yet so insidious and unperceived, that no excuse is i gt needed for this appeal. , Not in the spirit of partisans, seeking some“seliish i . _ advantage‘ over their fellow-citizens, but rather in the spirit of patriots,~con- _ ' 'cern’ed for the common Wrelfareof their countrymen and the universal interests of mankind, ‘i dowe now, weighing well our words,“ deliberately and solemnly i affirm these propositions to. be vital and momentous truths :e-—- i it p t l 1; The Constitution of the United States is built on the principle that the jstatevcan be, and ought tobe, totally independent of the Church: in other - words,that the natural reason and conscience of inankindare a sufficient or , uarantee of a happy, wel1_ordere‘cl, and virtuous civil community, and that 1, l i reeflpopulargovernmentmust prove a failure, if the Church is suffered to , scozptrollegislation-l « l * l ‘ ‘I i totally. 5 , T The religious rights and liberties of all citizens without exception, under the Constitution, are absolutely equal. v T 3.,These equal religious rights and. liberties include the rightof every‘ citizento enjoy, on the one hand, the un1'estricted exercise of his own relig- ious opinions, so long as they lead him to no infringement of the equal rights T of others; and not to be compelled, on the other hand, by taxation -or other- , wise, to support any religious opinions which are not his own. i 4, These equal reliorious rights and liberties do not depend in the slightest clegi-ee upon conformity to the opinions of the 1najor_ity,,but are possessed to i tlieir fullest extent by those who differ from the majority fundamentally and 5. TChi-istians possess under the Constitution no religious rights or liberties Wl1l,Cl‘1 are not equally shared by Jews, Buddliists, Confucians, Spiritualists, materialists, rationalists, freethinkers, sceptics, infldels, atheists, pantheists, ’ and all other classes ofcitizens who clisbelieve in the Christian religion. ~T 6. Public or national morality requires all laws and acts of the government t_oTbeinTstrict accordance with this absolute equality of all citizens with respect to religious rights and liberties. i t T 7.. Any infringement by the government of this absolute equality of religious l rights and liberties is an act of natio.n-al immorality, a national crime committed against that natural “justice,” which,“as the Constitution declares, the gov- T ernment was founded to “ establishfi’ To T T T ,8. Those who labor to make the lawsprotect more faithfully the equal re- ligious rights and liberties of all the citizens are not the “enemies of moral- i ; ity,” but moral reformers in the true sense of the word, and act in the evident W ‘ interest of public righteousness and peace. 9. Those who labor to gain or to retain for one class of relig.iouTs believers any legal privilege, advantage,T.or immunity, which 1S not equally enjoyed by T the community at large, are really “enemies of morality,” unite Church and t is magnified tenfold, W State in proportion to their success, and, no matter how ignorantly or}inno- centl ,are doijngtlieirqeutmorstt to destroy the Constitution and undermine this ree , government. ‘ T ‘IO. impartial protection of all citizens in their equal‘ religious rights and l libertTies,T by encouraging -the free movement of mind, promotes the establish-Q rnent*of the truth respecting religion; while violation of these erig.Tl1ts,by checking the free movement (of mind, postpones the triumph of truth over] error, and of right over wrong. II. N 0 religion can be true whose continued existence depends on contin-if ued “State-aid. If the Church has the truth, it does "not need the unjust T , favoritism of the State; if ithas not the truth, the iniquity of such favoritism I2. oTreIligion can be favorable to morality Whoseicontinuiedtexistence T if , depends on continued injustice. If the Church Tteachesgoocl nioifals, of T which justice is a fundamental law, it will gainin public respect by practising i i ferincr toTforego its unjust legal themorals it teaches, and voluntarily o l T advantages ;- if itdoes not teach gooclmorals; t ten the claim to theserunjust advantages onthe score of its good moral influence becomes as wicked as it“ T TTI3. _Whether true or false, whether a fountain of good moral influences or V of bad, no particular relicrion and no particular church has the le%sTtT claim in”: ‘rjusticeupon the State? or any favor, any privilege, any immunity. f’I‘he it e Constitutionisi no respecter of persons and not respecter of cliurches; its sole ;o,fficeT is to establishcivil society Tontjthe“ principles of right reason and Timpartial justice ; and any State aid riendered to the Church, beinga coimpuljel sion. of the whole fpTeo.p,‘_le to supportthe Cl1urc_h,”wrongs every,citi—zen who V protests against such ‘compulsion, violates qimpartial :ju__s1:Tice, sets . at naught Ti '_ T 6 ,‘l , ,\ - the first principles of morality, and subverts the T Constitution by undermining '_ i " u the fundamental idea on which it is built. . _ if these propositions are ‘true (and who can show that they are not true, or not in strict confiorinity with thetenor and spirit of the Constitution?) we respectfully submit to you that they merit the attentionof everyenlightened * and patriotic statesman, and of every just and large—minded citizen. They show that, as a nation, we are not to-day living in harmony with our own ; it great national idea,-—thata new “irrepressible conflict,” unsuspected by the i , up vast majority, is certain to involve us once more in civil convulsion, unless - l its causes are removed. Either our Constitution must be changedto suit . our practices, or our practices must be changed to suit our Constitution. The principle of secular “government of the people, by the people, for the people,” must be eventually abandoned, or eventually obeyed more faithfully. The issue touches the ve existence of our political system, which cannot S , longsurvive in open viola ion of the very ideas which gave it birth. By exempting church property from taxation; by supporting chaplains out of the public treasury; by appropriating public funds for sectarian institutions; by ' permitting Bible-reading and other religious services in the public schools, and thus perverting the public school system, for which all alike are taxed, into an instrument of religious propagandisrii by only a part of the people ; by appointing religious fasts and festivals in the name of the government; P by using "the judicial oath_ins.tead of simple afiirination; by enforcingon the - entire public the observance of Sunday as the Sabbath, and by various other practices too pnunierous to mention, — we unite Church and State, and fail ‘ P to carry out the essential principle of the Constitution. ‘ The Church is thus perinittedto seize the whole power of the State, and compel large classes of citizens to contribute involuntarily to the support of religious opinions which are not their own. That is the result of all State favoritism. to any particular T religioii; and it cannot be reconciled with the fashionable professions of, regard for religious liberty. l P All these real but unacl:nowledged- connections of Church and State con-e stitute at the same time private wrongs, public iinmoralities, P and. public dangers. They are private wrongs, felt to be such. by rapidlydncreasing multitudes of citizens, because they compel men to paypublic hoinageto . a faith which is not their own, and thus wound tliern deeply in their conscience l and ‘their self-respect. They a.re**p‘ublici i1fn1T101,‘2Lll‘tieS, because they violate the great laws of justice, freedom, and equal rights, wliichiareithe veryjsoul of ‘political ethics. . Theyare public dangers, because they sanction sectarian i usurpationsi, inflaineplsectarian ambitions, and powerfiilly temp-t to new s”,e cta-.i A riaii, encroachnients- ; because they create and accumulating mass of precedents . for trampling! under foot. the broad principle of the total separation of Church . andstate on which our whole government is founded; because they habitu- ate the people to a semi-ecclesiastical administration of the State, breed fanatical plots against religious liberty and equal religious rights, and cliafe tliousands of our best and noblest citizens with a consciousness of religious P o ression; in fine, because the sow the seeds of ett brawls in” man ' PP Y P ‘ Y 3/ 1 if it places over politico-religious questions wliichouglit never to arise, and be- S P cause they have already brought the country face to face with an issue of . a terrible gravity,.in our national politics, toucliiiig the future relation of the T‘ a Church to the publicischoolsysterri. Thesefacts are the general justification of theirnovegnent which has culminated in the formation of the National A - “Liberal League, and for the appeal which we now inake to your reason and conscience. 2 z p In his ‘f"Farewell Address,”'George Washington bequeathed to you these if grave and» pregnant words of wisdom: “Towards the a preservation of your e -S f governmenttand“the-jperrnanency of your present happy state, it is'requisite A‘ T if .V‘ "C7, not only thatyou steadily discountenance irregularoppositions to its acl‘be divided among religious sects or denominations,” will, ifadopted, still? q leave the Protestant. sects undisturbedin their present collective mastery’ over the public school system, and therefore ‘ought not to be] adopted, unless i * so arnencled as tolprevent anysect or rzuméer of am‘: from exercising con- XIII. V t ‘]t’eso[z/ea’,. That the Bible, being regarded as a» book of sacred character i and of religio_us authority by only a part of the people, is to all intents and ‘ l purposes a sectarian book; and we protest against the permission of itsluse in the public schools on the pretense of its being a non-sectarian book,as a manifest evasion of the truth, and a wilful disregard of the. equal religious l l rights of the people. 4» - l -I? XIV. V at lg lzemzm-;z,. That in no flippant or defiant spirit, but rather with a deep desire ., that the national lgovernment should be ‘just to the whole people, we protest , againstthe recen.t iproclamatiotn of President Grant, invitingthe people_ to p p I celebrate the Fourth of July by religious observances. i We deny emp.»hatic-+‘ ‘ r -ally the right of the Presiclentlto issue £1/Civil~.p1'OC1a1'1'13.lZiOI1_ of any religious ‘ fast or festival,‘-,to assume as President a strictly ‘ecclesiastical function,to ,5 entangle the State with the Church by interfering with the people’s free con- ~ i ‘A trol of their own religious observanoes, and to cast the stigma of govern,-* , mental disapproval on those citizens who do not choose to comply with this i unwarrantecl, officious, and irnpertinent invitation, We declare the manifestly increasing disposition ofthe government to meddle in matters of religion, and to yield to the instigation ofarnbitious sectaries whoatakexthis method of f.estab~lishing their own civil supremacy, to be a tendency of vast peril‘ to they ‘perptetuation offreiligious liberty. .We remind President;Grant of the nobler. iexamplle of his great‘ predecessor in office, ‘Thomas Jefferson, w11o,accord- i ~ ing to the,:h1s,torian,l“ refusedlto appoint days of fastingiand thanksgiving, T‘ 12 onlthe ground thatto do so would be indirectly to assume an authority bverll religious exercises which the Constitution has expressly forbidden. *A rec- ommendation from the Chief Magistrate, he thought, would carry with it so ‘ n much authority that any"-person or sect disregarding itwould suffer some degree T‘ of odiurn.” And We pointedly remind‘ President Grant ofhis own advice to the people last September at Des Moines, substantially reiterated in » December in his_,Annual M essfage ‘to Congress, but now so glaringly disre- garded by hirnself——— “ KEEP THE CHURCH AND THE STA'l"E, 1~*onI«:v‘1l::n.,s'i':r-- ARATE.” l t it i r l T XV ]€e:oZ'a/ea’, That We would most scrupiilously respect the right of church: a goers to enjoy their , Sunclay-worship unrnolested and undisturbed; and ‘we ask thlemfto respect the equal right of those who do not choose to ]\Oi1’1.l;l1€II'1 to enjoy their own Sundays in equal freedom. ‘ ‘ i T 1 ‘ Sunday. A Rerolexagij That the closing: of the ‘Internationale Exhibition on Su1ida.ysis" .a fresh usurpation of political power by the Church, ——-— a gross infringement “ of the equal religious rights and libertieslof the people, who have all been i taxed by public appropriation for the Exhibition,-——--a bitterancl grievous wrong to the poor and laboring. classes, who are thus ingreat measure de- barred from enjoying precious advantages which they of all classes have the ’ bestright and the most need to enjoy,-—=—andla monstrous denial of the re- ligious equality of all citizens who disbelieve in the aiieg'ed sacred character of "XVI. ' nesozem, rim» F. E. Abbot, B. F. Underwood,\George w. Julian, D. Y. Kilgore, _IarnesfMcA_rtl1ur, VV. J. Potter, R. P. Hallowell, Mrs. Dr.'Pratt, and Mrs. Kilgore, are hereby appointed a committee to attend l2l‘1€t~1‘l€XlZ meeting " of the United States Centenni.al Commission on Wednesday, July 5, to pre-— : sent the protest of the National Liberal League against the closing of the 1 International Exhibition on Sundays; T 1 ‘ T r » T _ l V _ ‘ XVIII. T ‘ t l i rlfieraglwcz’, That the? conversion of the United States government‘ into a Missionary.Society by the present administration, which has tmade it an t avowedobject to“ Christianize the Indians,” and carries it out by employing‘ , sectarian lmissionaries aspaicl officials of the government, wisanother in the u long and growing list of encroacl1rnents‘- on the principle of secular government. S it , llWHE:IiEAS,t The ‘i United‘ States statutes relafilngilto theTreasu1’y Depart; ’ nnent, Section 3517, expressly provide that---"‘ Upon the coins there shall be the following devices and legends: upon one side there shall be an im- pression emblematic of liberty, with an inscription of the word ‘ Liberty,‘ l and the year of the coinage, and upon the reverse shall be the figure or representation \ of an eagle, with the inscription ‘ United States of America’ and ‘ E Pluribus Unum,’ and a designation of the value of the coin ; ” and _ , MVVFIEREAS, ',l"heDirector of the Mint,‘without authority of lawancl on his S it own motion - alone, has seen ‘fit to inscribe on several of the coins, particu— » V larly on the new silver quarter-dollars and half~dollars, the legend “ InGod we ,trust;’~’:~therefore' is A i _ n V i H g be ‘, T" r tiferolz/ml That the Director of the"Mint deserves the severe censure of ; the people and dismissal from his office for this great abuse of" the trust t Areposed in him-.i T U 1 y i t t T T t i‘ - T “ l y l Jreroizzed, Tliatiplacing such an inscription on the national coinage is ana-» ,,,log'ous to striking the stars from thevnationalj flag and inserting the crosssin their stead,‘ or throwing, down thestatue of Liberty from thegclomge of the ‘national Capitol andlsetting up that of the}/irgin Mary in its place ;t and it and swift‘ rebuke of an outraged ,peop‘le.‘ i 1s that such cunning,stealthy, and dangerous encroachrnents bf the sectarian spirit on the secular character of the government should call forth the loud .4 XX. it 'tResaZw,e’, That we lierebytappieal to the country for funds to carry on the L L . l vitally important workifor which We have organized; thatéwe»believe there is abundant ‘Wealth and abundant enthusiasm‘ ready to aid us, just as soon as our objects are thoroughly understood and ‘widely; known; and that we rely confidentlylon the generosity of the patriotic public not to permit this‘ great i L cause to languish for want of they all-essential means. ‘‘ XXI. ‘ y y y.R‘(i".f0l7/i9d,iThat we accept the offerrof the Boston INDEX to be our official on torganl of comrnunication with the public, for the publication of announcements, ‘ acknowledgements", and otherrofficial papers of the Board of Directors; but i. t that wecassume no responsibility for anything else published in its columns, L and claim no control or influence in its general editorial management ' i XXII. ‘ i tviZx."éso.;’z/evil That the Directors are instructed to ascertain, if possible,tbyt ' ‘direct inquiry, whether the Presidential candidates of .thetRepublican and “ Democratict parties are in favor of strictly secular government and of the special measures we advocate; and to communicate the result to the public.‘ XXIII. i L , Itfesotlma’, That the resolutions of sympathy with this movement presented by*Professor Loos on behalf of the German “Union of Radicals ” arere- i céivediwith pleasureand respect; and that, while the National Liberal League ‘ «expresses no collective ‘opinion on the points inquired about, we hold "0111"- selvesy individfuallyt free to favor or to oppose any measures not includedin the specified objects which ‘we havetorganized toaccomplish; t 2» i ‘ XXIV. * on . Reroltzezi, That this League receives from the Michigan Stateiifissoiiciation of aSpi‘ritua1is'ts its able andtearneststatement of the objects of the National Liberal League, and tenders thanks for its assurance of cooperation in the promotion of these objects.‘ it a i t r L " . XXV. "L T ‘gr jllh:-'50]?/é‘.’(l?, That, recognizint%g°t.ithe yobviousfact that the support. of the ob- it Wjectsy of the N_at;ional‘ ‘Libyeral; ‘League must depend ._ch‘iefly_.uppon the strength of public sentimentfin their favor, we hereby tender our thanks to those brave y journals which now; Jinthe comparative infancyof our tmovemient,i,tta-regivingt "it theiryencoiuragement and influence‘oniaccount_o£“its intrinsicy excellence.‘ ‘. pxxvn ‘ L filesolr/cat’, That wehereby tender‘ our ‘tl1El.I1'l{S to‘tl1e5 publisher andeditor of L“-‘§,the,iiBoston [727/estz:g'czt07' for their 9 brave and earnest advocacy of the setcur“ ?la‘1T1Z‘ati§011‘O:f the government, in past years when the Liberal League was un- _ V ; *k_novvn and when their efforts were but poorly appreciated. L XXVII; L . H-i1t’e.9a!'z/.m',ytiTyl1at we regard ‘the. bust of Thomas Paine now on our” platform, 2 executed in marble by Sidney Morse, forpresentation to the city of Phil~ i I ‘ii'ffa‘£‘telpliia, and clesignecl forperlmanent preservation in Independenceil-iCial1,‘as *‘- L U [a noble and fit tesftimonialt to‘ ‘his heroic‘ and patriotic public career,» PROTEST ‘ or run NATIONAL LIBERAL LEAGUE AGAINST CLOSING THE INTERNATIONAL ‘ EXHIBITION oN sUNDAYs, PRESENTED Ar ran MEETING or ran. ' UNITED sures CENTENNIAL COMMISSION ON THE EXHIBITION GROUNDS Ar PHILADEL- PHIA, JULY 6, 1876. * , ; I PHILADELPHIA, JULY 4, I876. , To THE PRESIDENT AND MEMBERS on THE CENTENNIAL COMMISSION: Gem!Zemen,—-At. one of the sessions of the National Liberal ‘League,Njust organized at Concert Hall in this city,Nacom1n~ittee, consisting of F. "E-Abbot, B. _F. Underwood, George W. Julian, D. Y. Kilgore, James Mc:Arthur, Wil—t 1iam]._Potter, R. P. Hallowell, Mrs. Dr. Pratt, and Mrs. Kilgore,Was appointed and instructed to present to your honorable body the protest of the League ' gainst the closingof the International Exhibition on Sunday, together‘ with I‘ a list of the officers and members. ' ' IN 7 j N p Inobedience to these instructions, the undersigned members‘ of this Com- e mittee respectfully present the following, as the leading reasons of this rotest :-‘-~ I , ‘ N H P I. The Exhibition is a National affair, sustained in large measure by the impartial taxation of the whole American people, without theleast regard to l their religious beliefs :N and the equal rights of the whole people ought to be 8 scrupulously protected by the officers to whom its management is intrusted. , , NButit is a denial and infraction, of theirequal religious rights to exclude the Y , whole peoplefrom the Exhibition on Sundays, merely because a part of the 0 people believe Sunday to be a holy day. Such a belief justifies thoserwho - I , hold it in staying away from the Exhibition oniSundays; but it does not just-N I I N I ify them in keeping others away from it. The Church has no right under S- I the Constitution thusto impose any part of its creed on Nthezor.2*zz‘ of that union of , Church I and_State which has,wherever it has prevailed, been a prolific“ source of mischief to free institutions. It is absolutely necessary to secure to all citi— zens, without regard to belief, equal -rights and impartial religious liberty. The proposition to secure guarantees against any connection between Church L and State, as Well as to remove everything inconsistent witha purely secular 7, , _ government that how exists, by constitutional amendments such as you . I‘ -_ have proposed, rneetswith my entire concurrence, and will have my hearty , support. .We need only persevere in the noble movement, and success will yetcrown our labors. I I I I I I I I From: 2725 Rev. ROBERT.‘ COLLYER, C/zyzlcago, 17!. II» am entirely willing to go on the list, with your explanation. I think we mean the same thing. I L I I y I r I I From Mr..WENDELL PHILLIPS, Bosioiz, ./Wars. ii. “I entirely agree with the proposed amendment, and shall give itmy hearty support. But ‘many years since I decided not to join any more societies. , I I have done rrnyshare of such work andresponsibility, so excuse me from the " ‘V institutions. 5 FRANCIS E.iABBO'I‘. 23. /1 s From Mr; WILLIAM LLOYD GARRISON, Bostorz, Moss, r [This lettertwasi received and publicly read at the Centennial Congress-I bf Liberals, July 3.] p i . y. r y ‘ Boston, June 30, I876. DEAR Mn. ABBOT: —- i I shall not be able to attend the meetings of the National Liberal League_ at Pliiladelpliia; but if, its object is solely to elirninatefrom our Constitutions * and Statute-Books whatever shows the remotest leaning toward a union of Church, and State, or that is designed or calculated to give preference to any i a form of religious belief over another, or that subjects the religious opinions“ of any person to a prescriptive test, or that grants to religious bodies pecu- liar rights and privileges whereby their property _is exeinpted from being i equally taxed with other property, then I cordially give itiny approval. And i I do not see why it should not strongly commend itself to all classes, as a i matter‘ of justice and equality, whatever maybe the opinions tlieyentertain. - , concerning religion. Nay, those opinions, being widely variant and utterly ‘ yirreconcilable, furnish ample reason why they should be left to stand or fall upon theirown rnerits, and why there shoulcjl beyno supreinacyon t.he one hand or subordination on the other. _They belong to the domain of con- science, and, cost whatit inay, conscience must be left free. What can be more reasonable than this? To I‘€]€Ct it is to strike at the foundation. of‘ ' popular government, and to inaugurate the reign of pr-iestcraft, usurpation, and tyranny. , p i ‘ . i p . The function of the State is purely secular. It is to see that equal rights are enjoyed, and the general welfare proinotecl; but it has no right to decree, for exainple, that any book or any day or any place is holy, or to except ~church—property frointaxation, or to appropriate any portion of'theI_puhlic money for sectarian purposes, or to enforce the reading of the” Bible in the public schools, or to proclaim when it behooves the people to fast fortheir. sins rorfeast for tlieifabundance, or to require any religious _test for office, suffrage, iiatiiralizatioii, or giving‘ testimony in the courts. Yet it has as- 7 suined this as a part of its prerogatives; thus establishing a dangerous pre» cedent, in contravention of republican principles, and, in my ]U.Clg11‘lC:11lZ, in VlOlE3.tlO1'1«Ofi the spirit of Christianity itself,-—--Christianity as taught by its l a founder, and not as exemplified in our ‘day and generation. the League make it clear in its spirit and utterances that it has no ul- terior obiect in viewyancl that it does not seek a conflict with any form of religion or with any religion as such, but is in antagonism only with What _ i vseelszs to fetter the conscience,to define what is heresy, to mingle sectarian with secular affairs, and to keep in countenance .that union which is specially‘ if ' to be abhorrecl narnely, the union of Church and State. ' In that case, occu-. pying as it does common ground, itcannot fail to advance the cause of free Ydurs forthe‘ freedom of body and inind, ‘ r i WM. LLOYD GARRISON.‘ % % % % g A * isiazcmmsr1.+»Néither;%‘Go1&grésssnari%%a;iy%%%sta:ngsmy% ; 9miany%1a.v»€‘x9Wg;;:;1ng an~és£a‘ 11;. E % mgi:i1t:of 1€e1izgion,%%or favbwfitrxgafinypa;rti5m1ar‘fd::ing6; %'”%g%*ii<;>_}tJ.;;‘p::;;fl gg_1:he%£reev: " g fci. bf; °""’1We1'éof4L‘;=Vorzjpéaxfmittizzxg ji:x1 a;ny:Jdi6gjgfeae'~aA tmxéioxi.-%of or granting A _ %% vi1ege;A11mmunity; orgadjvan1;a g«a.‘~t6 ;2a;i1:_4uyg.s eQt:lot%3:e1;igiQusV;,'b9:dI;AAor to any numbexfof »ses;9tei7‘7j'}_ . M % ] _‘%VA_‘re1igiou;s‘ bodieis;%%%%i(;;>r1, QQPLQ pf“anyi$§tga.te.,g'eifihg£>r;dilfémfgly.or;indirec’b1y‘;%for%,thqQ v _ ;s;::}:;pport%Of@.ny ast-::4ct%~:;qLr religious‘ :b%O?d3s,i:*:9r;‘Q£«$nxnu561‘ 0f=V8\é<:13S%%0r religious Abodies; or anbfidg-A y ' ~ V V N % -ghg 6iE[§‘p'eech o ;r <§>;13%"‘i31j1f¢§:};ijw;;'_?e1si£s7,%o;1f <;peop1e pea—cea,b1yto assemblg V. % % .’ “:fan‘c:1 to%%pe1;i%b'ibh%:%£3a ‘owammem fem. &~édi:t§ss%;of-grievandq§;;‘vf;%I-M; % “ “ ‘ " % ‘ Smtirrxozq 2.-¥L3:To%%V;i+e1i'g,‘i1i$‘u3 ‘test; sJ:taJ1:%%;e3v*e rj3%1:£%e4‘f‘r§§1uired_ as Ta.%, “c ondition%i~3rj,;..si1%;1>fa‘.11%,%%1%1:o15riatelegislation-A‘ , V ‘ % i , - A M _ _ =*VEE‘he% above is the form of Constitutional 2_a.men;dme;nt propos"ed_“‘by the Boston INDEX of? g % I Janu%ry£86h1876, and} is fuller‘ than»theea.r11er“form‘%;proposed indshasame journa1%o‘f~Jan- % %ua%.;1.~.y , 7‘. % as % I g = w % % V ‘ % ‘ ‘ O 1 rec9%g1nw-61% 0*11%b0t11‘SiC1eS» of VAt1‘a11tie%4as4"the AV dexpdojnmt ofAmerican”jALibVAe$ra1”ismL,aiswe ~« 4 4 A AA AA T A0%F.F1c1ALToRlaAN% V V A it A A ,1}:EiJ1T0R1AI-{G0’N<“R%iBA A FRO;15LIINc;HAM,.% AA Q : A ” A f % , A A ‘, ‘ ‘ “‘ -‘ C I‘ ‘ ‘X ‘,, ‘V I J‘ ‘ Vi ‘ ‘ ‘ “ ‘ ‘ “ “ -‘ ‘ " ' “ “ ‘, ‘ :“ M " ax ‘‘ . ‘ ‘ ' ‘I’ ‘ r ‘ “” ‘ ‘v ‘ “ ‘I “ '‘:,.a ‘ “ . “ “‘ ' \: ‘ ‘” “Z 9 “ . _ ‘ ‘ :1 ’ ‘ V V ‘ “ ‘ ' ,.“° “ ‘ ‘w ‘ ‘ ', .y‘ ‘ “ ‘L ‘ V‘ . bu‘ ' ‘~ ‘ , ‘ 3 ‘ ‘ “ “ “ ‘V , A .‘ V‘ , ‘M ‘ ,,t ‘ ‘ ‘ -.§.“‘:::m " W“ “ x ‘- ‘ V‘ F. ‘,;,a\ ‘ ‘ VJ; MP3/:1‘ %.% B. G; C I~IO.'L?YJ A