OF THE AN INQUIRY INTO COSMIC AND COSMOGONIC MYTHOLOGY • ■ ^ AND SYMBOLISM By JOHN O'NEILL NVi s^xxk M\\XTOC THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA ENDOWED BY THE DIALECTIC AND PHILANTHROPIC SOCIETtES THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL ENDOWED BY THE DIALECTIC AND PHILANTHROPIC SOCIETIES BL313 .0 6 V. 1 / ,1 10000478163 . q^ The Night of the Gods AN INQUIRY INTO COSMIC AND COSMOGONIC MYTHOLOGY AND SYMBOLISM Bv JOHN O'NEILL NYX MXXX MM supremest, of the cosmic gods of all early Northern "''-• religions; with the Ptah of the Egyptians, the Kronos of the Greeks, the Shang-Ti of the Taoists and the Tai-Ki and Tai-Yi of the philosophic Chinese, with the Ame no miNaka- Nushi of archaic Japan. This is attempted in the chapters con- cerned with the Polestar and the mythic sacredness of the North ; where also the Eye of Heaven and the Omphalos myths find their local habitation. There too — at the end of the Axis — are placed those Triune emblems, the fleur-de-lis and the trident ; while the Axis itself becomes the Spear, Lance, or Dart of so many classif myths, the hopv of Kronos, the trident-handle of Poseidon, the typical Rod of rhabdomancy (which is also a branch of the Universe- Tree). The Magnetic Pole further gives occasion for the connexion of the North with the natural Magnet, and thence with all sacred 1 animated Stones : with meteorites, the touchstone The Magnet, c 1 1 * 1 -1^1 t 1 • t ■ 1 • ■' and beth-Els; and thus is stone-worship centered m the Polar Deity. Closely connected with the pole, and more closely with a former Polestar, by their position and their revolutions, the Seven stars of Ursa Major are shown to have been the originators of the The Number \ liolincss of the inevitable Number Seven. And to sci'en. j jj^jg J have been driven, almost against my will, to conjoin a somewhat full discussion of the Cabiric gods. All the Atlas-myths, endless and worldwide, are referred to the Axis ; which is also made the Pillar of the heavens, and the type and original of all the sacred pillars of the world. From the Pillar Irish Round \ the Inquiry naturally proceeds to the Tower; and Towers. J claims all obelisks, towers, and steeples as having been initially sacred worship-symbols of the great tower of Kronos, of the mainstay of the Universe. Other chapters pursue the symbolism of the Axis in the trunk The Xiglit of the Gods of the Universe-Tree, and in the Bridge to the other world ; which are two of the commonest and most wide-spread "properties" in the world-myths. The Tree in combination with the Seven stars is made to give us the Seven-branched Candlestick ; and the Bridge is also treated-of as the Ladder. The revolution of the heavens is more directh' figured forth in the Winged Sphere, \\\\\q\\ it is here maintained is the true significance of what has been viewed, by a greatly too limited The-j-nngcd \ interpretation, as mereh- a winged "disk," in the ''duk." J EgA'ptian, Assyrian, and other m\-thologies. \Mth the Winged Sphere too are connected all the divine birds and man- birds, and the winged scarab, and all the divine feathers worn by Egyptian deities. To this categor\-, and also to that of the triple emblems, belongs the Prince of \A'aIes's plume. The Universe- Egg can scarcely be separated from the consideration of the divine Bird. The Dance of the Stars is another figure for the revolution of ^he heavens ; and that leads to the discussion of religious and -I " round " Dancing, which is found among all races of Round Dances. V , . , . , , . , ... , -' men, together with circular worship by walking round Trees, Shrines, and other objects ; all of which, it is maintained, are ritualistic practices in the archaic worship of the revolving heavens and their god. With this subject the chapters on the Salii and the Dact}"li also connect themselves. The transition to the sacred s\-mbolism of the rotating (but not the rolling) \\'heel is here eas\- ; and I do m}- best to convince Theivhida/^ m}' rcadcrs that the Wheel-god of Assyrian and other tJieLaw. J s}-mbolism is the Compeller of the Universe, and that the turning of the " Pra\-ing"-wheel is a de\-out practice in his worship. The Fire-wheel then leads to an important conclusion as to the production of Fire in religious ceremonies ; and the wheel of Fortune is identified with the revolution of Time which brings in his revenges. The Buddhist wheel of the Law is also referred to the revolution of the heavens, while the Law is that of the universe the}- enclose. And so the Suastika becomes a skeleton s\-mbol of the wheel or the whirligig, and is connected also with the riu: Romaunt 1 Lab}Tinth. Attention must also be directed to the o/TheRcsc. ) j^Q^y Romaunt of the Rose, -which seeks to identify that famous s\-mbol also with the ^^'heel. The conception of re\-ol\-ing Time leads to a somewhat full DispiUatio Circitlaris. discussion of the archaic gods who personified Endless Time and its circular symbols. The Old Man of the Mountain belongs to this section. I'hat very common mythic figure for the heavens-vault — a supremely holy Mountain — is treated at some length ; and leads us to the Cone in religious symbolism. The starry heavens are also sought to be identified with white Argos and with the White Wall of Memphis as well as with the (mythic) city of Grecian Thebes. They are also the Veil of the universe, to which the chapter headed Weaving is devoted. The quadripartite division of the Chinese sphere is made to accord with the Four Living Creatures of Hebrew mysticism ; and the heavens-River is demonstrated in the Milky Way and in the perennial circulation of the atmospheric and terrestrial waters. It is impossible to do more in this place than briefly catalogue the other subjects treated-of. Such are, under the heading of the Ethocgcnus ^ Hcavcns-mountain, the Parsi Dakhmas ; the heavens- omite. J Boat of Egyptian and other mythologies, with which are grouped all Arks and the good ship Argo ; the stone-weapons of the gods, the Hindu Chakra, and the Flaming Sword ; the Cherubim of the Hebrews and Assyrians ; the Tat of Ptah, as an axis-symbol of stability ; the Round Towers of Ireland. The Seven Churches, the Seven Sleepers, and the Week are dwelt-on under the heading of the Number Seven. The heavenly Dogs of the passage to the next world are sought to be connected with the Egyptian 'jackals', and other sacred dogs. The significance of Right and Left in worship, and the Hindu Conchshell, complete this list. But it still remains to direct the attention of the reader more especially to the pages which deal with the names and myths of PalLas, AtLas, Latinus, Magnes, CEdipus, and Battos ; of Sisj-phus and TanTalos ; of the god Picus ; of Daphne, AgLauros and Danae ; of Numa Pompilius, of the Bees, of the Arcana, and of the Labyrinth. The genesis of Rhodes from the Rose(wheel), with the Colossus and the Colophon, also claim perusal ; as do the sections on Buddha's and all the other F"ootprints ; on the Gods of the Druids ; on the Dokana, which is brought down to the Lychgate ; and on the Omphalos and the Rock of Ages. But I must cease fretting the reader with this mere table of contents. The Night of the Gods. COMPARATIVE mythology," wliich already calls itself a science, is as yet very much like the mythic young Bears Comparative \ with whicli it has in this Inquiry (under the heading viythoiogy. J Qf 'Y\\c Number Seven and elsewhere) a good deal to do : it is amorphous. And even all its more shapely works must somehow resemble the patchwork quilts — ' crazy quilts ' they call them still in Ole Virginny — which were the Penelope's webs of our great-grandmothers. It is a science of shreds and patches, which all lie in a sort of gigantic lucky-bag, out of which everyone pulls very much what comes next to hand. The patches used to The tailor \ get sortcd (by our grandmothers) according to colour, patched. J Qj. gj^e, or texture, or chance ; and so sartor was resartus, the tailor was patched, perhaps over and over again. The scraps of mythological fact have also been sorted in various ways. There are the racial and the lingual classifications ; and the migratory system, which purports to be an advance on these. There is the divine or personal classification (not neglected here) which concentrates on the lay-figure of some one deity all the home and foreign drapery that seems to belong to him and to his analogues ; and there is the sorting of the myth-scraps according to their obvious identities : at times very much regardless of the individual divine entities they now purport to clothe. This last is the method chiefl\' followed here ; and it originally suggested itself doubtless because of the evidentl}- heterogeneous -(_ mass of rags (borrowed, stolen, and honestly come •• b}') which e\-en the oldest and most respectable gods had managed in the course of ages to darn and work up into their harlequin suits. This particular method endeavours to pick-over the rags and, if not ever to reconstitute the first new coat, at least to predicate the loom or factory and the trade-mark of the fabric to which the scrap belongs. To do this on a large scale would require an expenditure of time and other resources which it would take several ' golden dustmen ' to command ; and consequently, and also for the urgent reason that life is short, the present Inquiry is sadly defective in every direction. Disputatio Circnlaris. All is fish that comes to this net. On fait fleche de tout bois. The etymologist, the dreamist and nightmarist, the tiuwrltt, are all welcome here, to meet Euhemerus ; who may even worship his ancestors, and be frightened of their ghosts, in his moments pcrdus. Nor, in an Inquiry into matter which is mainly the product of the human fancy, can the theorist who draws upon his own imagination be excluded. But there is no rule v/ithout an exception, and one The \ exclusion alone is made : the geographer — so to call migrationht. / j^jj^ — -who regards every myth as a migration, finds little or no admittance, even on business. The world is wide, though not so wide as it was ; there is still room for all ; and no cosmic myth is asked whence it came on the map of the world, but only on the chart of the imagination of the human race. Given a small planet, and an evolution of life and living things thereon ; and of men who, wherever they be on that planet, see the same heavens, and the same phases of those heavens — not, may be, at the same precise hour of the twenty-four, nor on the same exact day of the 360 and odd, nor even in the same year of the cycle — given these men and their (within planet limits) same mode of evolution, propagation, cerebral organisation, and nutriment ; with the sameness of their non-planetary objects of sense and thought ; and there would seem to be no reason why they should not every where — as naturally as any one where — evolve the same or very similar theories, mythological or otherwise, of their cosmic surroundings. " The human mind," writes Sir M. Monier-Williams about the religious thought of India, " like the body, goes through similar phases everywhere, develops similar proclivities, and is liable to similar diseases." By "planet limits" of course the accidents of latitude and of climate are chiefly meant ; and if a man will place himself in imagination at such a distance in space as will reduce this earth to the apparent size, say, of the moon, he will see at once that all these " limits " are, roughly speaking, mere accidents in so far as the relations of the planet to the heavens are concerned. Or take a metaphysical illustration, and let earthly man identify himself with his planet as tJic Subject ; and then all the rest of the visible (and invisible) universe becomes for him the Objective, the same objective which every other subject on the planet has to represent to himself What wonder is it then that all these (by the hypothesis) identical subjects should take similar views of the The Nio-ht of the God;. same objective. Nay, one might carry it farther, and, presuming similar conditions — that is, (as may be seen in the course of the Inquiry) presuming a Hke inclination of the planetary axis, one might say that there is no reason why possible " men " on some other solar planet should not have evolved the self-same theories or cosmic m3-ths (more or less) of the same objective heavens. The greatest objection that can be urged against the "geo- grapher " or migrationist — and it is a fatal one — is that his theories Tiic \ are forcedly exclusi\'e. One migrationist says all migratio,iist. j astrognosy and myth arose in Eg)-pt, and went to Ciialdea ; another sa}-s Chaldean lore came from far Catha)- ; yet another saj-s the Greek gods came from India, or the reverse — for it isn't twopence matter. Each of these wants the field, or the shield, for himself; and may hold it for a time ; but one fine day some latent old scintilla of fact is discovered and blown-upon, blazes up anew, and explodes him and his theory in a jiffy. It is just the old Nurser}' Rh)-me over again : The Lion and the Unicorn fighting for the Crown ; Up jumps the Uttle Dog, and knocks 'em both down. Nor can I see how it gets us any more forward even to prove indubitably that the Cosmic m}'ths of country A did come from place B. Very well. Granted. Glad to hear it, even. And what of it ? What then ? It makes in reality no more approach upon the kernel of the question, upon the Ding an Sich that the mj-th enholds, than if you indubitably proved exactly the reverse. As ) Lobeck' remarked about the origin-spot of the cosmic ^' ^ Egg, quaerere ludicrum est ; for the conception is one of the earliest theories that would occur to the rudest imagina- tion. Such a quest is like asking : \\'hich side of an egg is first feathered? — a cryptic way of putting another universal sphinx- riddle : \^'hich came first, the hen or the ^'g'g'^ Prove to me, indeed, that the celestial m\-ths of this Earth came from outside the planet, and }-ou excite an interest far other than dilettante ; and that is the origin that ever}- heavens- myth of the whole human world and of all human prehistorj- has been alwa}"s trying, and is still tr}-ing, and will perhaps for ever try to prove, till the last s)-llable of recorded time. ' A^iaoj^/'mfntis, i, 473. D I sp n ta tio Circ it/arts. It has been said that the Imagination shall not here be denied its help. Much mythology has grown doubtless, Vain \ as much language grows, by some guess innate Imagination. J power of growiog and grafting and tangling ; but the great mass of mythological stuff has been projected by the human imagination. Why then should the imagination be ecartee in its analysis ? The mind of starkly scientific mould is not the best outfitted for poetical explorations ; and mythology and poetry have always been irredeemably intermingled. Who would give much value to the word Science in such a phrase as "the science of Comparative Poetry"; and the only justifi- cation of a science of comparative mythology lies in the fact that there must be method even in the fine frenzy of the poet, if he would charm the imaginations even of the most poetical minds. It is written above that the etymologist v/as received with open arms in these speculations ; but this free admission has The \ unhappily to be clogged with one important re- Etymologist, j gtriction. Philologia had to come rather as a handmaiden than as a mistress to Mythologia. It will be seen indeed throughout that the skeleton of a myth is employed as the masterkey of a verbal lock much oftener than any reverse operation is attempted. For it is now at last dawning upon a good 'ie.vt that the linguistic fetters — Sanskrit or other — in which divine Mj'thology has been, for a many recent years, forced to caper for our amazement, might well be hung-up with other old traps of torture, to edify the generations. Words are emphatically not the prime authors of t/wiip-fits. The name of a god cannot — you may swear it by the god — be the maker of the god himself This would be, in mytho- logical jargon, to have the Deity proceed from his own Word ; to subordinate the cerebrating power to the organs of speech. That there is a subsequent reflex action of the formed word upon the thinking brain that produced it is another matter altogether — just so does every other product of the brain react upon it ; just so does everything else in Nature act, switchback, upon the brain : as (may be) the brain does in its turn upon the Will that evolved it. But to say, and to found a cardinal theory // 14 The Night of the Gods. upon the saying, that a certain concatenation of sounds in one human speech naturally and habitually produced or reproduced a divine ideal in the brains of men of the same or of aiiotlier speech, is to heap-up impalpable sand, and build a card-house city on it. Llost god-names, like all their titles, are adjectival, descriptive. Tiu:,ta,mof \ Thus these names and titles irrefragably have, quite God. f naturally, their analogues, their coevals, perhaps their predecessors, in the ordinary words of the language in which they arose. By taking a whole class of resemblant divine and sacred words — first in one, and then in two or more tongues — and running them down backwards into their myths and meanings and roots, it is often found that a marvellous, an electric, light is diffused over the whole class. As examples of such a mode of treatment, the reader must mercilessly be requested to follow, step by critical step, the pages which deal with words in via-, me- and mag- ; in the- ; in pat-, dor- and tat- ; in 7nel-, in dm- ; in tab- ; in ag-, ak- and arc-. It is in fact contended here that the functions of a cosmic Xature-god and his consequent name and titles had an immense and far-reaching influence on (often) a whole class of other deities and their names, and upon the words of the ritual and the ' properties,' and the names of the properties, of his and their worship. This broadly defines the chief purpose for which Etymology is summoned as a witness in this Imjuiry where the nature, that is the function, of the god is made to account for his etymon, instead of the reverse process — his name educing his nature — being imposed upon the student. Poetry ever clings fast to old words, long long after they have dropped out of the workaday tongue. " If we take a piece of Old- English prose, say the Tales translated b}' Alfred, or yElfric's Hoinities, or a chapter of the Bibte, we shall find that we keep to this day three out of four of all the nouns, adverbs, and verbs employed by the old writer. But of the nouns, adverbs, and \'erbs used in an\' poem from the Beoz^'it If to the Song on Edward the Confessor's death, about half have dropped for ever."' That is to say that only 25 words in the xoo of prose were then old, while 50 (or twice as many) were archaic in poetry. The same is true of myth and fairy-tale and, in an infinitely greater degree, of religious nomenclature. In no division of speech ' T. L. Kinglon Oliphant's Old and Middle English, 1S7S, p. 4S9. Dispnla 1 10 Ciratlaris. is the conservative spirit so strong ; and it is in divine names and sacred terms that we must seek for some of the earHest, the most gnarled, and the doziest old roots of every tongue. This to a great extent explains why our philological canons exclude such proper names from consideration. If the Gods were not — like the Rex Ronianus — above grammar, they are at least older than philology.' It is quite possible that those big conjuring-words Esoteric and Esoteric Mid \ Exoteric, with which comparative religionites and Exoteric. J mythologians are wont to frighten each other, may not be nearly so big as we think they look and sound. A great deal of the ambitious theory about the elaborate invention — as if anything greatly religious was ever invented ! — the elaborate invention of two sacred beliefs : " one to face the world with, one to show" to the initiated, must perhaps be exploded. I would especially indicate chapters 8 and 9 of the 5th Book of Clement of Alexandria's Stroiiiata as a first-rate instance of the glib and transparent bonimeiits pattered to us from all time about these Esoteric and Exoteric peas and thimbles. There are at least three (or more) possible sources for this The c-Miutims y doublc vicw of any myth, (i) A sacred fact being o_/7„yth. J stated, defined, as an extremely naked thing in very naked words by those who completely (TC'wprehend it and all its analogues. (2) This statement's expounding, amplification (in order that it may be uiiders'l-a.n'd.fid. of those who do not comprehend), by an analogy ; by one or many analogies or allegories ; or by paraphrases of the naked words; or by parables. (3) By the true sense of the naked definition (or the true drift of the analogy or the allegory or the parable) getting lost in the process of time, or in the ebb and flow of the generations and revolutions of men and of nations. Now in case (i), the more recondite any matter defined, and the more naked any definition is, the more difficult is it also to be completely understood without study of its context, or viva voce exposition of its full meaning. Here is one fruitful cause of the esoteric and exoteric bifurcation. As to case (2), here we have ' " It. may be observed that the proper names of the mythological and heroic times contain elements of the Greek language which sometimes -cannot be traced elsewhere — cf. Zeus, Seirios, etc." (Preface of October 1S82 to 7th ed. 18S3 of Liddell a)id Scott's Lexicon.) But as to Seirios, see now pp. 24, 453, 5S4 infra. 1 6 The Nig Jit of the Go as. ample room and verge enough for all the mythological fables and legends ever handed down : if we besides give their full scope to the secretive dog-and-jackdaw faculty of the human brain, which delights in making caches and in cultivating covertness ; and also to the innate unlimited power and bent of the same organ for uttering and receiving the thing which is not : for ' telling stories,' in point of fact ; and listening to them. This it is, too, that explains why, as one fire or one nail, so nothing but one god or one mystery drives out another. As to case (3), we need seek no further for the origin of that ^ adorable bugbear of the pietistic and ritualistic mind ■* in all and every race, in all and every creed, the ' mystery of revealed religion ' ; which is never any more than a sphinx-riddle, and generally some mere archaic devinaille. But even that last word enholds the divine as well as the divining ; for there was an early time in all breeds of men when, in the matter of divines and diviners, six of one were half-a-dozen of the other, for their pious frequenters.' Does it not seem that these are sufficient waj-s of accounting for the Esoteric and Exoteric pieces of business .' And then, if we add on Euhemerism (which flourished long before Fiv>]/j,€po<;) and its reverse, and Platonic abstraction and idealizing, we get an immeasurable distance on the way towards a comprehension of the divagation, superfcetation, and overgrowth, of the Mythic Universe.- Lobeck'^ speaks of the " absurd symbolism " of the Platonists. At all events, if they proved nothing else, they were convincing as piatonian \ to tlic marvcllous inventiveness of their speculative ■wds. J powers, and their unlimited spider-faculty for emitting the tenuous cobweb. And myths are perhaps more maniable by us than in Plato's time. We are at least emancipating, if we can never ' To the mystery of revealed religion belongs Tiboo, which might be defined as a silencing of the brain by the feelings — that is by the Will. It is a not-speaking-of, a not- thinking-of, a not-enquiring-into the thing felt. So is intense and helpless reverence for the uttermost absurdities fostered ; so does it grow up and remain. - In Miss J. E. Harrison's Mythology of Ancient Athens (iSgo) p. iii, the ac- complished writer says : "In many, even in the large majority of cases, ritual practice misunderstood explains the elaboration of myth. " But this theory will not e.xpl.ain the elaboration of the ritual practice. ■' Aglaopha/ntts, pi. 550. Disputatio Circiilaris. 17 wholly set free, our tremulous little minds from the theological dreads and trammels which enveloped him. That isaveryconsoling passage in Mr. Lang's most valuable Myth, Ritual and Religion (ii, 202) where .le, competent over many, boldly declares that " in fact the classical writers knew rather less than we do about the origin of many of their religious peculiarities." But from another point of view — that of the extreme difficulty of the subject — we must still agree with that subtle and powerful brain of Plato's' that it required a man of great zeal and industry, and without any sanguine hope of good fortune, to undertake the task of its investigation. On this K. O. Midler^ (too highly apprizing the total gratitude of men) said that the more difficult this task, and the less clear gain it promises, the more ought wc to thank those who undertake it. In all mythologies, the complications, the overlappings, the reticulations, which reflect back the secular and multiple com- Thc ■> plexitics of Life, and of the Universe with its mani- Mytiwhgicai , fQ^ machinery, are ultra-infinite, infra-infinitesimal. Lahy) intlt. j , , . . ^ . , , And yet a mythologist is called upon unfaihngly to expound the whole of the one, of the Reflection (or be for ever silent) ; while who is expected to explain the other, the Reality — Life and the Universe .■■ The pursuit of a clear idea through the tangled mass is too often all but impossible. When the chase is at its hottest, one is continually thrown out, as though whole barrels of red herrings were scattered across the track ; and then again, when after many a bootless cast the scent once more is breast-high, all at once there comes a grand frost, and it all vanishes into thinnest air. It was a saying of Jacob Grimm's : " I explain what I can ; I cannot explain everything." Mr. Andrew Lang says merrily of one of his admirable books : " this is not a Key to all Mytholo- gies " ; and I shall, over and above that, even venture to hold that the key we arc in quest of is a whole bunch. K valuable remark of the late accomplished Vicomte Emmanuel de Rouge finds its place here. Of course it applies equally to every Egyptian \ Other land under the heavens, as well as to Egj'pt ; myths. j ^j-jij ;|. jg unfortunatcly almost ignored by students of myth, instead of being constantly kept in the very forefront of 1 Phacd. 229, - Mylhol. cli. .\. tS The Night of the Gods. their work : " The Egyptian religion was a reunion of local cults. We consequentl)- find in it a repetition of the same ideas under different types, and \\\\.\\ important variants." It should be added to this that apparentl)' incongruous qualities and functions are, for the same reason, foisted on to individual types. There is no m}-th or legend into which scraps of others have not strayed ; and there is perhaps none in which there are not details which seem to clash with its general central idea, its back- bone, its axis. With these apparent " faults " — to talk geology — there is no pretension here otherwise to deal ; but what is attempted is to co-ordinate the similar incidents and characteristics common to a vast and widespread number of myths, dissimilar it ma}' be in their apparent general drift ; and thence to educe, to build up — or rather to re-edif}- — a system (of Heavens-worship) which has long either fallen to ruin, or been defaced, blocked in, overbuilt, by a long series of subsequent mj^thical, theological, and religious constructions. The anatomical truth — learnt onl\' from comparative stud}" — that no organ e\-er remains (that is, continues to sur\-ive) uncmplo}-ed, is true also of mythology and theology. The disused, neglected, pla}'ed-out personage or rite decays, becomes decadent, and disappears. The altar to " an Unknown God " could not have been the shrine of an undiscovered deity. He was a fallen god, whose very name had been forgotten. And that is why the reconstruction of a vanished cult is like the building up of the form of an extinct organism. Fortunately, the comparative method of treatment planes the way, taking now a fact from one and now a hint from another of the innumerable species and varieties of myths and creeds ; and even, again, finding some almost whole and sound — and now therefore startling — survival to illustrate the roiestar 1 general theory. Such is, in the case of the Polestar- ■worskip. i -worship theor}', the extremely interesting subsistence of the Mandoyo, Mendaite, or Subban community ; a still contem- porary continuation of the old Sabseans, far more striking than the romantic fables .ibout the secluded persistence amid the recesses of the Lebanon of the attaching idolatry of ancient Greece. Here, in these Rlandoyo, we strike not the coarse ore of the South-Sea savage, but a genuine old \ein of solid metal ; worn indeed and /,v,ir ) long-worked, but still unmistakeable in the vm);j/; ,See what is said elsewhere as to Seirios (.Sirius). Disputatio Circularis. 25 THE practical labour in composing this Book has been to collect and focus on the several salient points of the general The Method. \ subjcct some of the endless traces of the Divinities of (again) j )-]^g Universc-machinc, its Axis, and its Poles, which are to be found scattered and lost or in the curious condition of the open secret in myth, legend, etymon, sacred literature, or common idioms. That this task is a practically endless one has been often forced in upon the writer ; but the best that could be done in a limited number of years has been done ; and now that the snowball has once been set rolling it may perhaps more rapidly accrete. One-man-power is a sadly insufficient force (sadly inefficient too, as the writer keenl)' feels) to apply to such a mass of matter. The divine Plato and the marvellous Kant (wrote Schopen- hauer)^ unite their mighty voices in recommending a rule to serve as the method of all philosophising, as well as of all other science Two laws, they tell us : the law of homogeneity and the law 02 specification, should be equally observed, neither to the disadvantage of the other. The first law directs us to collect things together into kinds, by observing their resemblances and correspondences ; tc- collect kinds again into species, species into genera, and so on, till at last we come to the highest all-comprehensive conception. As for the law of specification, it requires that we should clearlj distinguish one from another the different genera collected under one comprehensive conception ; likewise that we should not confound the higher and lower species comprised in each genus ; that we should be careful not to overleap any — and so forth. The first of these rules (which, Plato answers for it, were flung down from the seat of the gods with the Promethean fire) is, it is trusted, fairly well observed in this Inquiry ; but as for the second — well, the gigantic Octopus of mythology will not rule out as straight as the avenues of a brand-new American city. It is impossible even to arrange the chapters and sub-sections in an ' Two Essays by Arthur Schopenhauer. (Bohns .Series, 18S9. ) An admirable anonymous translation. 26 The A'io/ii of the Gods. ascending order of relative importance, or to prevent every chapter and sub-section from tangling its tentaculae into every other. It is feared also that the constant struggle towards such a logical arrangement, and the endless cross-references indispensable to the student that wrote and the students that read, have ruined all literary effect, and so ensured the fatigue of the most willing reader. For this, the indulgence of his second thoughts is craved. However strong the original desire may have been to make this Book light reading, it was very soon found out in the practical composition of it that the desire was to be another of the myriads that remain unsatisfied. However, by condemning the driest of the stuff to a smaller type, I often venture to invite the reader to that blessed pastime of skipping, which has so much to do with the flourishing of circulating libraries ; and even — it is sad to think — with the popularity of " our best authors." To provide an antidote, in the absence of a preventive of all this faultiness, a very full Index is offered. And thus, to those who I find the book dislocated and discursi\'e, and therefore •* obscure, I shall not have the assurance to say, as Stephenson did of the Drinkwater Canal, " Puddle it again ! " ; but shall in all humility ask them to read-up any puzzling point by the Index, which (E. and O. E.) is as good as I could make it. A tentative and suggestive rather than a demonstrative treatment of the verj^ complicated and treacherous subjects dealt- with has generally proved imperative. This may convey a sensation of lack of definiteness ; but even that reproach is in such speculations preferable to an accusation of cocksuredness and dogmatism. It has been the constant desire, too, to invite the Reader to draw his own conclusions, rather than to hammer away at him with perpetual and perhaps superfluous pointing of the moral. Every student of mythology must still say, as Sheffield said of his writings : dubius, scd non improbus — full of doubt, but open to proof. And, of course, it goes without telling that the term " Disputatio " is here used in its mildest classic sense of examination, consideration. While everywhere " making for " accuracy, endeavours have been also made to avoid iotacismus. As the late and justh- honoured Francois Lenormant wrote' of one of his books : Sans aucun doute on relevera dans ce livrc des fautes, des erreurs. Elles ' Oris,Juci lie Ihistoire (iSSo) i, xxi. Dispiitatio Circularis. 27 etaient inevitables dans une recherche aussi etendue, sur dcs matieres aussi difficiles. Mais du moins, ce que devront je crois reconnaitre les censeurs meme les plus severes, c'est que I'etude a et6 poursuivie consciencieusement . . . J'ai pu me tromper, mais c'a ete toujours avec une entiere bonne foi, et en me defendant de mon mieux contre I'esprit de systeme. Hume justly admired Rousseau's lament that half a man's nfe was too short a time for writing a book ; while the other half was too brief for correcting it. I shall feel very grateful to every one who has the patience to go through this Book in a critical and enquiring frame of mind, Rcadmcamibe\ especially if he will be so good as to communicate natiantk. j ^q j^g (either privately or publicly) the errors and difficulties which must infallibly be detected. The more searching and unsparing the criticisms are, the better will they be for the final result of the Iiiquiiy which is their object. One leading reason for two heads with four eyes being better than one head with two, is that they enjoy the faculty, now generally denied to Sir Boyle Roche's notorious bird, of being in two places at once ; and thus possibly getting independent views of any one object. It must be in great part an author's indivestible prejudice for his own production ; but I cannot help thinking that there is something that will remain even after the most destructive criticism of the theories here advocated. One eclatante proof of their likelihood is the universal encounter, the endless ramifications and persistent up-cropping throughout mythology, of the evidences on which they are based. It is hardly credible, either, that false unfounded suppositions should be so coherent in their numerous phases. Should any of these theories survive the ordeal to which they are now surrendered, it is hoped that it may be even possible for some few wide readers of critical and willing minds to come together and help in indicating and collecting further evidences of Heavens and Polestar Worship, either in the directions here inadequately sketched out, or in others. JOHN O'NEILL. Trafalc.ar House, Selling, BY Faversham, \2th FtPiiiaiy 1S91. 28 The Night of the Gods. \ SHORT series of brief articles on a few of the theories here urged appeared in print some three years ago' ; and I trust I do not con.mit too great a breach of etiquette in here thanking so eminent a publ'cist as mv kind friend Mr. Frederick Greenwood for the space which he afforded them. That one writer on any subject human or divine should borrow from others has, at this stage of the literature of the world become inevitable ; and a comparative study like the present necessarily borrows its materials from innumerable quarters ; but nothing has been wittingly taken or set down without acknowledgment (in so far as reasonable space would admit). The crime has been committed from time to time, in matters not of primary importance, of copying references in trustworthy books without actually running them down in the original authorities. And it would have been an endless and fruitless work of repetition to have given individual references to the mere mythological-dictionar)- matter throughout. This Inquiry owes much to many friends and to many other writers ; though they are in no way answerable for the present deductions from their facts, and would perhaps hasten to repudiate my theories. There is as yet, thank Heavens, no such thing as orthodoxy in Mythology- ; its field is one vast prairie or rolling veldt, where every man may '" put out '' and trek and lager for himself. Some names have already been mentioned, and to these must be added Dr. W. F. Warren, the able and versatile president of Boston University Mass.', whose books on Cosmology are a mass of erudition and suggestion," although many may regret they cannot go all the way with him in some of his conclusions. His active readiness to assist students is well known, and I have often acknowledged my separate obligations throughout this Inquiry It was subsequently to an examination of the late Lazarus Geiger's Dn'elopment of the Human Rac^ and M. Henri Gaidoz's Le Dieu Gaulois du Soldi et le svmbolisme de la Roue,'' that the ^^'heel and Winged Sphere theories here advocated took their final shape. The name of the latter distinguished mythologist and Celtic scholar is frequently invoked ; and his criticisms have been highly valued. To Professor Sayce of Oxford and Professor Gustav Schlegel of Leiden I am indebted for kmd encouragement, interest in my labours, and suggestions. To the latter's wonderful Uranogtaphie Chinoise most of the matter on the Chinese Sphere is due: and with great generosity he has read my proof-sheets. My manuscript was indexed before reading Professor Robertson Smith's ' "Northern Lights,"' in the St. James's Ga:ett£, December 1SS7. - E.g. The true Key to ancient Cosmo/o^' and ^lythieal Geography, and Para^iise Found : The cradle of the human race at the North Pole. ^ Lectztrcs atid Dissertations. Translation of Dr. David Asher : TriiLncr s iSSo. "* Paris, Leroiix, 1SS6. Disputatio Ciiru/aris. 29 Religion of Ihc Semites (vol. i). The valuable corroborative references to that very able book have therefore been inserted after this Book was practically complete. I owe him besides my thanks for his personal encouragement and criticism. Some of Sir G. Birdwood's work upon symbol questions was still, he regrets to confess, unstudied by the writer when the MS. was ready for the press ; still, several references (notably as to the deduction of the number Seven from Ursa Major) have, even so been inserted ; and the writer has besides to express his indebtedness to that authority upon Indian symbolism for excellent suggestions and much too indulgent criticism. Mr. Herbert D. Darbishire of St. John's College, Cambridge, an expert in classical etymology, has been good enough to go through some of the work, and to point out the most erratic of my views. Of course he is in no way answerable for any of my aberrations. Japanese mythology has been taken as the starting-point of the Inquiry, partly because of a slender acquaintance of some years' standing with Japanese,' and chiefly because of its aptness to the matter in hand, and its general neglect. In this I have to acknowledge the greatest obligations to my old friends Mr. E. M. Satow and Mr. \Y. G. Aston, the authorities on the subject, whose patience in bearing with me is far beyond the return of ordinary gratitude. Attention is also frequently drawn to Professor B. H. Chamberlain's labours, especially his great translation of the Kojiki, so profitable to the student. It is hoped that the Chinese characters and Egyptian hieroglyphs scattered through the book will not frighten people away. They are often inserted only to save certain students the trouble of referring to other books. The writer's acquaintance with either language is limited in the extreme, and he has here to express his obligations to his old friend Professor R. K. Douglas and Mr. E. A. Wallis Budge of the British Museum for their very kind correction of his blunders in these matters. All the facts relating to the Dervishes have been submitted to the excellent Sheikh of the Mevlevi Tekke of Cyprus, the devout and kindly Esseid Mustafa Safvet Dede, to whom I am indebted for many facts, and for the stones of the Dervishes which are here figured. The lowest deep of ingratitude would be reached by anyone who works steadily at myth, symbol, and religion if he did not again and again declare the fruit he has at every handsturn gathered from Professor F. Max Midler's valiant undertaking and great achievement, The Sacred Books of the East. The valuable work especially of M. James Darmesteter, Dr. Legge, and Mr. E. W. West in the volumes of that series has been perpetually used and referred-to throughout. And in this connection should again be mentioned another most important Japanese sacred book (which is not in the Series) Mr. B. H. Chamberlain's Kojiki.- ' Nishi-Higashi Kotoba no Yenishi ; A first Japanese Book for English students, by John O'Neill ; London, Harrison & Sons, 1S74. - Trans. As. Soc. Japan, vol. x. 3° The sNight of the Gods. f n n 1 1 T T 1 ? f ' \ \ \ l\ f 4^ n i T -1- t I t 1 i 1 Axis Myths. I The Axis as Spear, Pike, or Pal. 2. The God Picus. 3. Divine names in Pal-. 4 The Rod and Rhabdomancy. 5. The Fleur-de-Lis at the Axis-point. 6. The Trident. 7. The Aopv and'ApTr;; of Kronos. 8. Divine Karnes in Harp- and Dor-. I. — The Spear, Pike, or Pal. IN the cosmogony which the Japanese fondly beheve to be purely native, all the heavenly gods, the Kami, designate two of their number, Izanagi and Izanami, male and female, brother and sister, to " make, consolidate, and give birth " to the land of Japan. For this purpose they are provided with a heavenly spear made of "a jewel." The pair stood on the " floating Bridge of Heaven," and stirred round the ocean with the spear' until the brine was churned into the foam which has given their German name to Meerschaum pipes. As the spear was withdrawn, some of this coagulated matter, or curdled foam, dropped from its point, and was heaped-up until it became an island, the name of which means self-curdled, Onogoro. This Island has long been our property in Greek myth. Delos was the centre or hub of the Cyclades, which were so called " from a wheel," utto kvk\ov, and were situated Trepl avTi-jv T?}y AyXov, around this very Delos ; and Ar;Xo9 (Sc'eXo?) also meaning manifest, it was said that the island was so called because it became manifest, suddenly emerged from the sea. This seems a truly extraordinaiy parallel to Onogoro the " self-formed " (or curdled) island ; and as for its churning there is the similar operation, the " cycling" of the ' Mr. B. H. Chamberlain's Koiihi, pp. iS, 19. 32 The Night of the Gods. {Axis Cyclades, of which Dcloswas the nucleus, the centre. One account of its origin said Poseidon with one blow of his trident made it surge from the bottom of the ocean, a still further amazing coincidence with the Japanese legend, for it gives us the spear of Izanagi. Delos floated at first, but became fixed when Lato had brought forth, at the (Universe) Olive-tree there, or else when her son Apollo fixed it. The coming of Lato to the island, if the name be understood of a stone-pillar, an al-Lat, is a reproduction of the pillar of the Japanese island. [The Reader must get at least as far as " Divine names in Lat-" before giving its full weight to this.] The orders to the Japanese pair were "to malce, consolidate, and give birth to this drifting land."^ Hatori Nakatsune, a celebrated native commentator, said that Onogoro was originally at the North Pole but was subsequently moved to its present position." Another name of Dclos, ^Oprv^/ia, may have nothing to do with the opTv^ or quail, as an old construing would have it. It may be, I suggest, from opco to stir- up, to rise (we have exactly what we want in the Latin ortus, from orior) and 7); or 'yea or lyala, the Earth (although I believe that under the philological rules of letter- changes as they stand there is no way in which either '■^/ala or 7)} could become -7(0). If however opTvyta and oprv^ are to be referred to a same origin, we should have to take the sense of "dancing "or twirling: Latin verto, Lithuanian wersti turn, Welsh gwerthyd spindle, Sanskrit \-art turn, vartakas quail ; which would make it the turned land ; and would entail a meaning absolutely similar to that of all the Varshas of Hindu mj'thic cosmogony. It would thus be the churned, or the up-risen land. Yet another Delos origin-myth is this : Asterie was the daughter of Polos (the polar deity?) and mother of Hcrakles ; or (?//;v she was daughter of the Titan Koios — the hollower (of the heavens) ?, and sister of Lato. Zeus cast her into the Cosmic Ocean — the fate of innumerable deities — and where she fell arose the island of Asteria or Ortugia or Delos. Asterie was also changed into a quail, which is a variant of the muddle already mentioned, and really means that Asterie and Ortugia were one and the same. Again we have the churning idea in the Strophadcs, the turning- islands, of the Argo-voyage. They were also called Plotes, the Floaters. "And so it is that men call those isles the isles of ' Kojiki, p. iS. - Mr. E. M. Satow's Ftirc Shinto, 5S. Myths7\ The Spear Pike or Pal. 33 turning, though aforetime they called them the floating isles. "^ The change of name was connected with the descent of the bird-gods, the harpies. Rhodes, spun on the golden spindle of Lachesis at the prayer of Helios, is I venture to suggest a similar myth (see " The Romaunt of the Rose," later on) ; and so is Corcyra (Corfu) whose name K-opKvpa comes from KepKL^, a spindle. EupuTruXo? son of Poseidon, or a Triton, gave a c/oci of earth to EiJ(|);;/A09, another son of Poseidon, and an Argo-sailor, light in the course, skilful in chariot-driving. This clod fell into the Ocean, or was thrown into it by Euphemos on the counsel of Jason (Icson) ; and on the instant became the island Kalliste. Here, though we have no spear, we have a i'/v'dent-god, the T'r/ton. In the ArgoHautikon (iv, 1552, 1562) Triton, in the guise of a youth, takes up the clod, and Euphemos (The Good Word.') accepts it, and has a very strange vision about it (1734 etc.) which recalls the union of heavens and earth. The clod speaks as a woman, says she is the daughter of Triton, and asks to be given back to the deep nigh unto the Isle of Appearing, 'Avdipij, " and I will come back to the sunlight." He flings the clod, the /3&)\o9, into the deep (1756), and therefrom arose the island Kalliste (that is the most beauteous, simply) also called Theres or Thera ; which is one of our Divine names in The-. Theras son of Autesion (Self-made ?) brought men there, after the time of Euphemos. This brings the voyage of the Argo (in th.&_ Argonatitikon) somewhat abruptly to an end. But the event and the ending may be thought perfectly appropriate, if it be looked upon as a legend of the creation of the Earth by the divine Word. The previous voyage of the Argo would thus be a pre-terrestrian series of celestial cosmic legends ; and if this view be novel, it is not devoid of supports. [See too what is said of Crete under the head of the Loadstone mountain.] I think no other interpretation of any of these " islands " will suffice, except that which views them all as allegories of the Earth itself. And I now (upon the completion of the MS. of this Ltquiiy) add the deliberate conclusion that this churning of the Island is a leading and world-%vide Creation-myth, of which the real significance is the spinning, stirring-round, or churning of the Earth {figured-forth as insiilatcd in the Universe) by Deity, out of the Cosmic Ocean of the Waters, the Chaos of other cosmogonies. The ' Ar^onmitikon, ii, 296. C 34 The Night of t/ic Gods. \A. xis Hindu Bharata (or Churned?) Varsha may be another example of the myth. Another island, which must reluctantly be left for future investigation is " the isle of Elektra daughter of Atlas " where the Argo was beached in order that her crew might be initiated.' This island is explained as SamoThrake, the mysteries being those of the Kabeiroi, patrons of mariners. But it was also nigh to the heavens-river Eridanos," was sacred, and was the chiefest of isles. The Argonauts also visited the island of Kirke, and in describing their visit to Korkura (Corcyra) Apollonius' gave us its oldest name of Drepane, and the legend of the origin of that name, which was that beneath it lay the drepane or sickle with which Kronos mutilated his sire, alias the harpe in fact. This sickle was also said to be the " harpe " of A>;a) Xfioyia, that is the Earth-goddess DeJNIeter ; for Deo once lived in that land, and taught the Titans to reap the corn-crop for her love of Makris (which is too cryptic and perhaps corrupt to arrest us). Makris was also a name of the island, and so was Scherie or Scheria (Order ? Law, Tao). However much these incidents and names have got muddled, they indicate the Earth, as an island in the Universe-Ocean. Its inhabitants the Phaiekcs were of the blood of Ouranos. We have the island turning up later in Japano-Buddhic myth when an Apsaras appears in the clouds over the spot inhabited by a dragon. An island suddenly rises up out of the sea, she descends upon it and there espouses the dragon who is thus becalmed.* "According to Babylonian thought, the Earth came forth from the waters, and rested on the waters."^ The island Hawaiki, the only land then known, perhaps, is clearly put for the Earth in a New Zealand h)-mn which says '" the sky that floats abo%'e dwelt with Hawaiki and produced " certain other islands. Hawaiki here is for Papa the Earth-goddess, and the sky for Rangi the heavens-god.'' There is another curious parallel to part of the Japanese creation-legend, in the Hindu allegory in which the gods and the demons, standing opposite to each other, use the great serpent Vasuki as a rope, and the mountain Meru or Mandara as a pivot and a churning-rod — the "properties" have got mixed — and churn the milky ocean of the universe violently until fourteen inestimable typical objects emerge.' One of these is the Universe-Tree Parijati, bearing all the objects of desire. Plate 49 in Moor's Hindu Panilicon clearly makes the mountain a central ' Afgon., i, 916. " Argon., iv, 505. ^ Argon., iv, 990. ■* Satow and Hawes's Handbook. " Dr. E. G. YJm^s, Akkadian Genesis (iSSS), p. 32. ^ Taylor : Nezu Zealand, p. 1 10. " Guignaut's Creuzer's Relig. de rAntiij., i, 1S4. Sir Monier Williams : IJindiii-sni, 10^ ; Kcl. Tliougfit and Life in India, i, 108, 34:]. Mj'i/is.~\ The Spear Pike or Pal. 33 conical axial peak. It rests on the Tortoise (Vishnu in the Kurmavatara), and Vishnu in youthful human form is seated on the summit of Mandara. Vishnu is also seen among the gods who, pull-devil-pull-baker fashion, haul the serpent Vasuki against the horned Asuras. The modern Japanese commentator Hirata Atsutane (1776-1843) said that the stirring round with the spear was the origin of the revolution of the earth.' Sir Edward Reed" repeated this theory of the spear being the Axis from Hatori Nakatsune ; and Dr. Warren^ cites Sir E. Reed. It would be extremely interesting if we could consider this to be an indigenous idea ; but it must not be forgotten that there was one important modern source of information as to Western Ptolemaic Astronomy which was doubtless open to Hirata, in the treatises written in Chinese by the Jesuit Missionaries to China, by Sabatin de Ursis in 161 1 and Emmanuel Diaz in 1614, and by others later.^ Hirata too may have acquired at Nagasaki soine further tincture of Western learning. Another case of creation by the spear is the achievement of Athene when she struck the ground and brought forth the Ohve. Here we get the two axis-symbols of the tree and spear together ; and the spear-axis not merely produces the Earth but the whole Universe, which the tree figures forth. And was not the aged stump of this fallen miracle shown in the temple of Erechtheus on the Acropolis of Athens,'^ as the original of all the olive-trees in the world ? There is yet another strange parallel to the Japanese spear- myth in Garcilasso de la Vega.'' The Inca told him that Our Father (the Sun) sent down from heaven two of his children, son and daughter, near the Marsh (Japanese i'\shihara) of Titicaca ; and when they desired to rest anywhere, they were to stick into the ground a golden rod, two fingers thick and half-an-ell long, which he expressly gave them as an infallible sign of his will that wherever it would enter the earth at one push, there he desired that they should halt, establish themselves, and hold their court. After several fruitless efforts, the golden rod pierced the ground at the site of Cuzco, and embedded itself so completely that they never saw it more. We shall see that Cuzco was an omphalos. Hatori's and Hirata's gloss that Onogoro, when formed, lay under the Pivot of the vault of heaven, the North Pole, although it has since moved to the present latitude of Japan — may (or may not) conceal a recognition of the revolu- tion of the equatorial round the equinoctial pole, which revolution is completed n about 25,868 j-ears. Of course this causes no change of the terrestrial pole. ^ Pure Shinto^ 68. '^ Japan ^ i, 31. ^ Paradise Found, 141. ■* Wylie : Notes on Chinese Literature, 87. * Botticher : BaumcuU, 107, 423. ' Baudoin's French edition, Aniste dam 1704, i, 63, 66. C 2 3'' The A'iglit of the Gods. [Axis It is at least curious that the churning legend could also be fitted to the theory of the evolution of solar systems from revolving nebulous matter, to which attention will again be directed farther on as regards a Chinese speculation. [Professor Oliver Lodge,' in adopting Sir Wm. Thomson's theory of vortex atoms, has suggested a universal substance in space, some portions of which are either at rest, or in simple irrotational rnotion, while others are in rotational motion — in vortices, that is. These whirling portions constitute what we call matter ; their motion gives them rigidity. This is a modern view of Ether and its functions. — Nature i Feb. 1883, p. 330.] This mythic Spear may be recognised again in the shadowless lance- which in the Alexander legends the hero plucks either out of Atlas or out of the topmost peak of the Taurus mountains ; and in the golden blade with which the Iranian Jemshid pierced the bosom of the earth. ^ The Nagelring sword of Nithathr and of Hotherus in Saxo Grammaticus {Hist. Dan. p. no) belongs to the same armour)'.' It is made by Volund (that is Weyland the smith, Hephaistos) and is of untold value ; getting possession of it puts the Asa-gods to flight ; it is in the remote regions of the direst frost ; in a subterranean cave (that is, plunged in the Earth) ; Nithathr surprises Volund and takes the sword ; its companion is a mar\-elIous Ring, which becomes an arm-ring in the myths, and is called Draupnir, from which eight rings (making nine) drop every ninth night. V'olund's smithy (the heavens) is therefore full of rings. The hasta set up in the ground during the judicial debates of the centumvires is another re-appearance of the Axis, at the point of which sits the world-judge. (Hasta posita pro rede Jovis Statoris. Cicero, Phil, ii, 26, 64) and the Sheriff's javelin-men doubtless give us a relict of the Roman curis, of the spear of the judge of heaven. The pair of Japanese Kami immediately took possession of their island — which, as above, we must by extension, understand as the Earth — and having firmly planted their spear therein, made a heavens-Pillar of it.'' Heaven and earth were then very close to each other, we are told, and so, when this divine couple sent their daughter, Amaterasu, or Heaven-shine, to rule as goddess of the Sun the lofty expanse of heaven, she went up the Pillar or ^ Lecture cit London Institution, December 1SS2, - Paradise Found, 135. ^ Guignaut's Creuzer's Retig. de VAnt,, i, 335, 375. '■ Rydberg's Tent. Mylli., 1SS9, p. 430. ' Chamberlain's k'oiiki, 19, 3:2. Myths^ The Spear Pike or Pal. 37 Hashira.^ The name Amaterasu has as strong a likeness as can well be expected to Pasi-phae (see Index) ; note, too, that the Japanese legend recognises her existing before she was made sun- goddess. Heaven-shine is thus her name ; the Greek being " to-All-shine." It is notable that in the SatapatJia-Brahmana" it is said that " in the beginning, yonder sun was verily here on earth." The thesis favoured throughout this Inquiry will be that tJtis spear and pillar are but symbols of the Earth-axis ami its prolongation, that is of the Universe-axis itself as it seemed [and still seems) to be ivhen the Earth zvas quite naturally taken to be the centre of the cosmos ivhich perpetually revolved round that axis. It must be remembered that this supreme, sublime, motion of the megacosm was patent only at night, and that its majestic progress could be noted only by the stars. The Axis upon which the stupendous machine turned itself thus became an all-important origin of endless symbols in, as is here suggested, a heavens-worship of the very remotest and most faded antiquity, a worship which culminates in the adoration of the Polar deity's self Eventually when Ninigi, the first divine ruler of Japan, had been duly appointed, and had descended, Heaven and Earth drew apart, and actual connection between them ceased.' " The separation of Heavens and Earth" is the Japanese phrase which answers to our " beginning of the world."'' The Chinesy preface to the Kozhiki makes an exposition of this cosmical philosophy as follows : " I Yasumaro' say : Now when Chaos had begun to condense, but force and form were not yet manifest, and there was naught named, naught done ; who could know its shape .' Nevertheless Heavens and Earth first parted, and the Three Kami" performed the commencement of creation. The Passive and Active essences then developed, and the Two Spirits became the ancestors of all things." The passive and active ' Trans. As. Soc. Jap., vii, 419. " Eggeling's, ii, 309. ^ rurc Sliiiito, 51. ■* Mr. Chamberlain's A'ojiki, pp. xxi, 4, 15. ^ Futo no Yasumaro, a pure Japanese imbued with Chinese culture, and editing the Kozhild, here writes. His death is recorded on 30th August A. D. 723. ^ This triad is the Lord of the awful Mid-heavens Ame no Minaka-Nushi, the Lofty- Dread-Producer Taka Mi-Musubi, and the Divine-Producer Kami-Musubi. "These three Kami were all alone-born Kami, and hid their beings." 38 The Night of the Gods. [Axis powers are here the Chinese Yin and Yang ; and the two Spirits with whom Yasumaro identified them were Izanami and Izanagi. In a New Zealand myth, Rangi and Papa, Heavens and Earth the universal parents, were once closely joined (see Index) but were at length separated by one of their children, the god of forests' ; a reminder of Goethe's saying : Order has been taken that the trees shall not grow through the sky. [It is odd that in archaic Japanese the modern haha (mother) is supposed to ha\c h&tn papa, which word is remarkable, says Mr. B. H. Chamberlain ; " for most languages possessing it or a similar one, use it not to denote mother but father. "= Ukko and Akka are the names which were gi\en among the Finns to father heavens and mother earth.'] The idea of the former union and later separation of heaven and earth is also to be found in the Aitareya-brd/iinana^ ; and it i.s, of course, ever present in Chinese cosmical philosophy. Another form or off-shoot of the myth is the union of Kronos with Rhea, who in Phrygia and generally in Asia Minor was the goddess of forests and mountains.'' Photius (citing Eutychius Proclus of Sicca) said the Greek epic cycle began with the fabled union of heaven and earth." The conceit is still too the common property of the poets as part of the ubiquitous idea of a Fall : In the Morning of the World, when Earth was nigher Heaven than now. — (Pippa Passes.) We still uphold in our " Mother-Earth " half the idea which is completed by the Sanskrit d}aus-Pita, the Greek Zeus-Pater and the Latin Ju-Piter=P'ather-Sky (or Heavens). The Finnish Mother- Earth, Maa-emae or Maan-emo is consort of Ukka,' as Jordh is of Odin, Papa of Rangi, or Ge of Ouranos. [The subject of the Spear, Lance, pal, curis, spike, pike, and sword, runs through the whole Inquiry like a file through its leaves ; and the Reader is recjuested to refer to the pages treating on Ares and the Curetes ; and above al to the Inde.\, to which patient attention cannot too often be invited.] [The chain of gold fastened from heaven, by which Zeus boasts in the Iliad (viii) that he could hang gods and earth and sea to a pinnacle of Olympus, may be a variant of the Universe-axis myth. ' Lang's Custom a>td Mytli, 4S ; Tylor's Prim. Ciilliirc, i, 290. ^ Trans. As. Soc. [apan, xvi, 262. •' Castren : FinniscJie JiJytiiologie, pp. 32, S6. ■' Muir's Saiisl;rit Texts, v, 23. * Tide : Kronos, \> 26. " Bibl. Didot ; Cycli cpici rcliqiiiii, p. 5S1. ' Crawford's Kaltvala (1SS9), p. x.\. Myths:\ The Spear Pike or Pal. 39 A chain or thread of gold was part of the head-gear of Great Maine, the mythic ancestor of the HyMany, and the son of Niall of the Nine hostages, who appears in so many Irish pedigrees, but must be equated with the equally mythic Welsh Neol. Maine, Mane or Mani, again, is identical with the Welsh Menyw of Arthur's Court.'] ' Prof. Rhys's Hibbert Lectures, 374, 375. 4° Tlic Nig/ti of the Gods. \Axis 2. — The God Picu.s. PICUS the father of Faunus ( = Pan?) seems to be a Pike, Spear, or Axis god. He was the son of Saturnus ( = Kro- nos). Faunus was also said to be the son of Mars, which equates Picus the pike-god and ]\Iars the spear-god. He was also father of Fauna the Bona Dea, (whose true name was taboo) an alias of C\'bele. Fauna also meant good, and thus of course, being connected with fauere to be propitious, implied good fortune, which gives me a desired connection with the central lucky emblems. Faunus it was said became a serpent in his relations with Fauna,' which gives us a connection with the Egyptian Axa serpent. The changing of Picus into a picus-^'/Vv/, a pie, is a muddling of words, favoured by the archaic conditions -which have brought peck and beak from the same root a.s pike. It is odd that there is a similar contact — not to call it confusion — in the case of apirri (see later) w hich means both a weapon and a bird. Dr. O. Schrader makes the picus (OHG specht) into the woodpecker. I\Ir. E. R. Wharton says OHG speh magpie goes rather with specio ; but he too makes picus a woodpecker. The following is a philological table of the matter as regards Ficus : Latin . Picus . picea . . The Pike-god. . piniis silvestris. French 11 pic bee . . peak. . beak. Celtic. Irish 11 pice . picidh . . pike,/(7r/t. . pike, long spear. Gaelic pic . . pike, weapon. Welsh 11 11 picell . pig ■ pigo . . javelin. . pike, beak. . to pick, peck, prick. Cornish piga . . to prick. Breton pik . a pick. English pike . . pointed staff. „ peak . . variant of pike. i' to peck . variant of /2ton, in which bathing nine times gives feathers and " the right to fly." A vagary upon the Trinity-House of the Northern Cosmic Ocean, and souls becoming birds in the same quarter. The idea of the " marsh " may come from a confusion of palus pali a stake, the axis, with palijs paludis a marsh or pond ; but palus also was a reed or rush (see p. 46), and that may even have been the earlier signification. (Recollect the Japanese ashihara, reed-expanse). The mythic palus Maeotis (Mowwrf?) may thus meet with its elucidation. ApoUodoros'^ said that, according to some, the Gigantes, sons of Ouranos and Ge, dwelt in Pallene. Pallor. This goddess was a companion of Mars ; a dog and a ' Apoll. Bibl, i, 6, 2. = Bihl, iii, 12, 3. ^ Bib!., i, 6, I. D 5° The Night of the Gods. {Axis sheep were her sacrifice, and she had lier pallorian priests, the Salii, Pallor is always said to be pallor personified ; but that pallor is not the paleness of the face ; that is not how gods are made. In view of all that is here to be urged as to white being an adjectival term for the heavens, I shall suggest that it was from the whiteness of the celestial displays that Pallor took her first colour-signification. Plautus has a pun {Men. iv, 2, 46) which serves slightly here : palla pallorem incutit ; where palla is actually a cloak, but may have sub-intended a weapon. Pallor was used of the shades of Hades, and pallor amantium was especially common ; so that the paleness of fright was not a primary meaning of pallor, and the companioning of Pallor with Mars would have been not because she turned the runaway pale, but because, like the male and female Greek Pallas, they were both spear deities ; the connection with the Salii seems conclusive. She was an ancient goddess in Pal-. Palleo meant am pale (in the facej from any cause — age, sickness, superexcitement, or passion. Paloiiiantia, the divination which resembled rhabdomancy, used to be explained in the dictionaries as coming from irdWeiv to shake. Of course the source of both, and of TraXo? a lot, is pal a rod or spear. IlfiXni, the adverb which means long ago, of yore, erst, aforetime, may perhaps have had a connection with the Old One whose position in so many mythologies is at the end of the universe-pal ; 7raXaio/j7JT-a)p:=ancient Mother ; and see Palaimon and PalaMedes above. The affectionate expression "old pal " which superior persons are now pleased to dub as slang, and which is said to be Rommany,' might claim descent from the same great origin. Palcestra, iraXalarpa. I believe the connection between pal a pole, and ■waXi] wrestling, might be attempted by means of the locality WaXaiarpa where, in the time of Pausanias, tradition still had it that the struggle between Theseus, tJie god, and Kerkuon took place. Kerkuon obviously, like Korkura (Corcyra), belongs to KepKU a spindle. He was a central revolving universe-god, and his wrestling with Theseus would have taken place at the pal or axis. Plato made Kerkuon one of the inventors of AArestling. The bending down of the tops of the trees which is attributed to him, would again make him central, as referring to the overarching 1 /i)/ a plank. Grellman's 7/isf. des Bohiiniois (French ed.). Paris iSlO, p. 296. pala lord prince ; palam my lord ; pale straw ; pali lady princess ; palim madam ; palifo magnificent ; palo post prop. {Vaillant's Lajigue Rovimane^ Paris 1861, p. 120). But there is nothing analogous in Paspati [Tchinghianis de Fempire Ottoman, Constantinople, 1870, p. 401) who only gives /a// behind. Myths.'] Divine Names in- Pal-. S^ and pendulous heavens-branches of the Universe-tree. Add that he was son of AgaMedes, the central Impeller-God, and there is but little question left. If Sinis, who was also killed by Theseus, and to whom is credited the same tree^trick, be indeed as is thought the same as Kerkuon, we should by joining the two names have the sinistzx idea of turning to the left, or endeavouring to reverse the motion of the heavens (which claims so much attention in this Inquiry). Theseus, the heavens-god, thus fought " for the right," for the Law and Order of the Universe, and won. Kerkios the charioteer of Castor and Pollux has obviously a similar etymo- logical signification, from his driving circularly round the heavens. And it is hoped that no one's feelings will be over-shocked by explaining the name of the great enchantress-goddess Circe KipKT) in the same way. It falls almost too patly into my theory (later on) about turning the wheel of Fortune. Her skill, so supreme as to bring down the stars from heaven, is then prosaically explained away as their bringing low, as they set when she has turned the heavens round to that extent. That explains her connection with Picus the axis-god, and her wand, The remaining a year with Circe (as Ulysses did) then merely refers to the revolution of the annus of the year. This subject might be pursued indefinitely, but not now. Etymologists have invented no root that will afford us straight- away this indubitably radical and ubiquitous word pal, a stake. This is a fact which may well give us pause. They however say that pale is a doublet of pole ; and bring pole from a " root I'ar, later kal, to go, to drive " ;' a derivation as to which it may be safe to suspend final judgment until further orders, as r and / can scarcely be permitted to interchange in philological roots. ' Skeat's Etym. Diet, (ist ed.), p. 454. B 2 52 The Kio-ht of the Gods. [Axis 4. — The Rod and Rhabdomancy. FOR some future occasion must be reserved the wide-branching subject of the divining-rod and rhabdomancy. It would seem, however, that the magic rod or wand must be connected with the symboHsm of the Universe-Axis. Prof. Robertson Smith says that " No doubt the divining-rod, in which a spirit or Hfe is supposed to reside, so that it moves and gives indications apart from the will of the man who holds it, is a superstition cognate to the belief in sacred trees."^ Philo-Sanconiathon says rods as well as pillars were worshipped at an annual Phcenician feast.- If the rod, pole, and pillar were identical emblems of the Universe-Axis, it would account for the Romans worshipping peeled posts as gods,'' and would throw a flood of light on Jacob's peeling white strakes in rods of fresh stora.x, almond, and plane trees (Gen. x.xx, 37). The rod of Aaron (mountain) that grew, bloomed, and fruited, must clearl}' be connected with the marvellous Tree, the ^lountain, and the Axis. The middle-age writers on the Occult* put the divining-rod in the same categor)' with the rod of Moses, with which he struck the rock and brought forth water ; with the golden sceptre of Ahasuerus, of which Esther no sooner touched the tip than she obtained all her desires ; and even -with the line in Psalm xxiii : " th)' rod and staff, they comfort me." It was also the rod or wand of Pallas Athene with which she metamorphosed Od\'sseus in the 13th and i6th — it is golden in the i6th — books of the Odyssey. In Ezekicl xxi, 21 the king of Babylon "stood at the parting of the way, at the head of the two ways " [at the fork of the roads] " to use divination. He shook the arrows to and fro." Cicero {Dc off. i, 44., 158J in writing to his son used the expression of providing for one's wants as if by the divining-rod : quasi Virgula divina, ut aiunt. Varro is said (Nonius 550, 12) to have written a satire called Virgula Divina. Tacitus described the Germans^ as cutting into several pieces a rod (virga) from a fruit-bearing tree, ' /Heli^: of Semites, 179. = Eusebius : Prap. Ev. i, 10, 11. ' Festus, s. V. (i-/«(ir»;«. ■■ A^\3X\?^ above the horse."' On stelae of similar origin, the same "caduceus" permutes with the ring (or wheel-tire ?) at either side of the cone* (or triangle ?). The possibility and significance of this mutation explains itself tout scul on the Universe-rotation theory — and on no other. M. Ph. Berger connects the Phcenician 9 with the Hebrew asherah,^ that is of course (as here abundantly shown) with the Universe-Tree whose trunk is the axis. That the 9 was used as a war-standard and as a battle-axe — a god's celestial weapon — is clear from M. Goblet's" book above quoted, pp. 288 to 291. Like the ^3l^^, the dokana (which see), and many other supreme symbols, it was sacred and ritualistic, and was also taken to the ' As to this symbol, see "The Trident." ' Migration des Symbolcs (1S91) 286. ' Ibid. 289 (citing Hunter, table xv, 14 ; and Lajard pi. xlv, 5). ^ Ibid, (citing Corp. inscrip. Semitic, tab. liv, 36S). * G<7Q. .-ircheol. 18S0, 127. '' I have to thank M. Henri Gaidoz for drawing my attention to this just-published book (Paris, Leroux, 1S91) on the occasion of a visit to Paris (iSth April 1S91) when this first volume of this Inquiry was partly in print. I have much pleasure in directing the attention of students to its numerous well-winnowed, w^ell-grouped, and clearly- presented fads and illustrations. Even setting aside its migration theories altogether (as to which liberavi animam meam in the Disputatio Circulaiis), it is a most able and useful publication. Here and there I kept on fancying as I read on, that M. Goblet d Alviella was Hearing some of the theories of this Inquiry ; but no : he passed by on the other side. Myths^ The Rod and Rhabdomancy. 55 battle as a talisman, a representative of the great god (of war). Here in this double function, religious and warlike, we have the whole genesis of the inviolability of- insignia of authority : the standard, le drapeau, the flag, the ensign, the rod of empire, the regalia, the sceptre, the mace, the wand, the staff of office, le baton de Marechal, le verge du Sergent, and even the truncheon truncated of its emblems. In spite of all that. Mercury favouring, the winged 9 (save for the persistent attachment of ^ to the planet Mercury, and of y to Taurus, in the almanacks) has now sunk down to a mere dummy stereo or cliche in engravings of Industry and Commerce. Of course it is the merest puerility to derive Mercurius from merx merchandise, as Festus did. The word is doubtless mer + curius ; and curius comes from curis, an Osk word, the Sabine spear (see Index). Merus means pure and, as also meaning "central essential," is put by Mr. E. R. Wharton^ with the Old Irish medon, and is so compared with Latin medius, as follows : " yJ/^^z^i- unadulterated : 'central, essential,' ^ * medics MEUH- Me^to^jj a town, Olr. medon fiiirov, cf. MEDH-J- medius." " lieaaos middle : *fi.e6-jos, Lat medius, Olr. medon, Got. midjis Eng., OSlav. mezdinu." Now here we are at once taken to the MeDea class of words (which see), and MerCurius becomes the central-Speargod. There is an old recognition of the first syllable mer- meaning middle in Arnobius (iii, ii8)": Mercurius etiam quasi quidam medi-currius dictus. That is middle-runner (medius + curro). Mer- is to be found in the names of many other divinities. M-^/309 Meros Merus was the Indian Mt. Meru, which the classic ancients considered sacred to Jupiter and Mercury. A friend has here favoured me with the following note, which seems to run counter to my speculations : " Latin medius (Greek /xeVos-, Sanskrit madhyas) contains original d/i which never becomes ;' in Latin, d it is true sometimes becomes r in Latin, but in that case no Greek or Indian word would show the r (as in Mijpos- and IVIeru)." Merops Mepoi/r the putative father of (S?ae6cov the Brilliant (who was really the son of Helios) may perhaps be put in the category of gods in Mer-, as must Merope daughter of Atlas (or one of the Pleiades, or the daughter of Sol and sister of Phaethon). ' Etyina Latina and Grcrca. ' See also S. Augustine Civ. Dei, vii, 14, and Isid. Orig, viii, II. 56 The Night of the Gods. \Axi. xis fiipo^j/ bee-eater, and fiepimcs men, are here very puzzling. (A god of the West would be a bee-eater, a star-eater, as the constellations set.) So must Mermeros the Centaur. Here it is impossible to avoid reference to all that is said elsewhere as to Marmar (see Index). Yama (= restrainer?) the first man is titled Dandi or Danda- dhara, the Rod-bearer. The celestial Dandaka forest lies between the heavens-rivers Godavari and Xarmada. The lituus of the sheep- shepherd was called a pedum (seizer ?j. It is found in the hands of Pan, the Fauni, Acteon, Ganymede, Attis, Paris, and so forth. But the lituus with which the Roman augur traced his divination templum was the distinctive ensign of an augur, and had been in use time immemorial, as the fact that lituus is an Etruscan word and the preservation of the lituus " of Romulus" in the curia of the Salii' might attest. A drawing of it will be found farther on. The nio-i (Chinese ju-i) is a short cun,"ed wand commonly ending in a kind of trefoil. It is used in Japan chiefly by the Buddhist high priests of the Zen sect, and it is generally carved from jade or some other precious stuff." The Eg)-ptian rod or wand was some five feet in length, and held thus TO It ended in a flower or a knob, and was a token of command and distinction.^ The god Nefer-Atmu (Ptah's son) rests upon his shoulder the magic wand which looks like a horned serpent =^-=— , and would thus give a pregnant gloss upon the bible- storj' of the rods of Aaron and the other magicians. However, the head is said to be a ram's, and its name is ur hekau ^^^ X i— '• It replaced the instrument r''^ — . in the ceremon}- of opening the mumm\''s mouth.* The lituus which was the Roman augur's crooked "crozier-"wand \ is found upon the di\'ine headdress W net or ^'^ which connects an Eg\-ptian deity with the North, and also upon that W " ^ se;^et which implies power over both North and South (see Sesennu) ; but no! upon that which indicates gods of the south alone, the nefcr A This seems an important series of facts, as connecting the lituus speciall)- with * Cicero, Difiii. i, 17. - Anderson's (most vahuilile) Ca/. of Jap. paintings in Brit. .Vus.. pp. 32, 66. ^ Pierrct : Diet. iT.-inli. E,^ypt. 112, 213. * I'ierrct : W-iab. HI, 3S0. Myths?\ The Rod and Rhabdoinancy. 57 the North and, as I should be disposed to maintain, with the Northern end of the Univ^erse-Axis ; while the pristine type of all magic rods would be the axis itself The Egyptian rods were also standards (with or without flags ?) in the priest's hands in sacred processions and ceremonies ; and they were then topped with a god's hat, a sacred animal, a naos, a lotus-flower, a sacred barque, and so forth.' The uas \ or sceptre borne by some gods is clearly a variety of the wand. The "greyhound's" head with ears laid-back which tops it may refer to the dog at the North end of the Axis ? As to these ears, however, Mr. Flinders Petrie's remarkable exhibition of 1890 contained a lintel from the temple of Tehutimes III at Gurob which seemed to me so forcibly to suggest an ass's head on the uas that I ventured to take a ■ rough sketch of it. (Portion of the A^^imu have the uas ears.) It is strange enough that in Ovid's {Met. xi, 85) legend of Pan's companion Midas we have both the ass's ears and the wand (under the alias of the reeds that whisper). There is also a horse-eared or ass-eared Irish Lynch. Mr. Flinders Petrie has also in the kindest way lent me for engraving the two examples of animal staff-heads which here follow, of the full size. They were probably held in the hands of statuettes of gods or kings. The face of the smaller, which is of bronze, looks like some antelope, and when contrasted with the ass-head drawing seems to add point to W. Pleyte's somewhat vague statement that "provisionally we might theorise the symbolic head of the god Set to be composed of the oryx or the ass, with the two feathers of Set- Nehes."- The monstrous conventional ears ' Pierret, Diet. 112, 213. - Lcttre d Th. Deviria, Leide, 1863, p. 53. 58 The Night of the Gods. \Axis which form the top of the other (a woodenj staff-head, do seem almost to differentiate off into the two feathers of head-dresses. In this case the face is unmistakeably like a greyhound ; and no one can possibly say that all the three types were taken from any one animal, The connection of Set with this staff or sceptre is of course a moot point, and more may perhaps be said about it under the heading " Set." The heq | or pedum is e\'en more like a bishop's crazier than the lituus. It was a sign of authority (joined to the scourge) in the hands of Osiris and the Pharaohs ; and tieq meant to govern, direct, conduct ; and also prince, regent. The uat' sceptre |, with the lotus-flower, is peculiar to goddesses, and is rendered aKrjTTTpov in the Decree of Canopus. The word also meant pillar, prop, and adoration. The Sceptre | of King Semempses ( ll 1 of the first d\'nasty sometimes differs from the uas at the wrong end of the stick, the South. Mr. Petrie remarks that this figure of Semempses is the regulation Ptah. But M. Pierret says {Did. 496) "there was no royal sceptre properly so- called.'' De Rouge said {Notice Sommaire, 86) "the recun'ed stick has the simple form of the royal sceptre." This " sceptre " 1 is still now often carried as a " stick "' by the Bedawin of the Sinai peninsula ;^ and Mr. Petrie says it is evidently a natural branch with the thick stem-part carved into a head. If there be anything in my conjectures about Set (see also Index), this may be important. M. Pierret^ remarks that the use of the head of the stick in the Egyptian oath, to which Chabas drew attention in the Abbott pap}-rus, remains to be explained. I shall just note down the following coincidences for future examination : iJ^--^^^ apt, stick, measuring-rod, plank. (J^i'r-i apt or Apet, the goddess Thoueris. IJ ^s. ^ ,-. ams, stick or ensign. d ^X s— —■ f^ Amseth, " funeral genius." Will it turn-out that there is any connection between the Eg>-ptian name of (the Greek) Osiris, and this luis sceptre ? Deveria gave Osiris as Uasri ' Baedeker : Lower £^'//, 46S. ■ Vocai. 405. Myths.] The Rod and Rhabdomancy. 59 ■j^ I " [1(1 ^, and it is also given' as As-ra, r|'^_ Is the god's name compounded of Uas and Ra ? As itself J] rx is Isis, and as was also a dwelling rj ; but she was also called Hes fi |-^ ^^ which was too the name of the sacred heifer adored from the most ancient times of the Egyptian empire ; hes was also a vase. Uas as the sceptre I was written Ap ) ^, I Uash, to invoke Ap ) Uas, a greyhound, r O (see also Index). M Uat, Thebes, ^ ' . Pierret says was not always read as uas, and gives as examples I j uab and ^^^ smu. Dr. Birch gives uab and us for r and I. The following transcriptions of Osiris are from Dr. Birch's Egyptian Texts.- Asar (twice) n - .... 4th dynasty. Asar (once) and Hesar (thrice) 25i • '8th „ . 18th „ . 1 8th Hesar ij Asar (four times) [j .- ^ Asar (four times) rj S\ Asar rl"^ Asar^ . 1 2th, 20th, and 26th dynasty. . 1 8th dynasty. . 28th „ The god Ans-Ra (1 y JH occurs in the Per-em-Aru, i.e., "The Book of Coming Forth by day " (Book of the Dead) xlii, 2 f Wiedemann' gives (among other readings) Heseri for Osiris ; Auser has also been proposed (as well as Auset for Isis) ; and the latest and nearest reading for Osiris is Mr. Budge's Ausares ij S I _^_ JJ .' To these magic wands belong the Staff of Solomon given to King Bahram Guhr in the Persian tale by the lord of one of the four cardinal Kaf-mountains of the Universe. It caused any door to fly open, no matter how strong it might be, and even if guarded ' I'ierret's Fucai. 48, 109. ^ Bagster and Sons, k. d. ' Pierret, I'oaz/'. 37. ■* Wiedemann, Acgyptisches Geschkhtc, p. loS. ^ Brit. Mus. Papyrus 10,188, Col. xxviii. 1. 21. Ed. Budge, Oh the Hieratic Papyrus of Nesi-Amsii^ in Arcliaeologia^ vol. lii. p. 166. 6o The Night of the Gods. [Axis by talismans and enchantments. In the Katha Sarit Sagara what- ever is written on the staff of the (male) Asura Maya comes true. In Stanislas Julien's Indian tales from the Chinese the enemies of the Two (demon) Pisashas yield humbly to their staves. In the Tamil Madaua Kdinardja Kadai, one cudgel can belabour enemies if aimed at them, and another can put a vast army to death in the twinkling of an eye. In a Norse tale the North-Wind gives the Lad a stick which lays-on when told-to. It might be asked whether the sortes Virgihanae, the consulting of Vergilius in preference to other authors for omens, may not have been due to a connection of his name with virga which, though a common word, was applied to the caducous of Mercury. This would be one way of accounting for his reputation as a diviner. De Quincey suggested that his necromancing character grew out of the fact that his mother's father was called Mag'us.' But Homer was resorted to for the same purpose. A strange revival of the rhabdomantic craze is just now in progress ; and \\\e. Fortniglitly Review for August 1890 furnished some interesting information about it. The advancers of this kind of thing are by no means to be set down as "dotty in the crumpet" (as they say in East Kent) : very very far from it indeed, one would guess. " A patient who is not put to sleep, or in any way placed under hypnotism, places his hands on those of a ' subject ' who is hypnotised, while an assistant moves a big magnetised rod with three branches for a minute or two in front of the arms of the patient and subject. ... If the ' subject ' is a woman and the patient a man, she becomes convinced that she is a man, and talks about her whiskers" [risum teneatis, amici 1] "With the aid of a dynamometer you can measure the exact amount of power transferred from the subject to the patient "(I) Remark however the trident reappearing at the end of the Rod. And, after all, multitudes of very worthy folk still piously and literally believe that the Egyptian magicians " cast down every man his Rod, and they became serpents"; while the greater magician" Aaron's Rod swallowed up their Rods "." Readers of this Inquiry should carefully note that Aaron equals Mountain or The High, and that the Universe Mountain-Rod is in all legends the unique Atlas-Axis ; several axis-deities are also seen to be swallowed up by the Earth in the course of the Inquiry. The connection of the Serpent and the Rod is also a universal myth, and no instance of it is unimportant. The blossoming rod is paralleled b\- the brazen club of Herakles, which (apud Lampridium) sweated at Minucia. Another of his cudgels was of wild-olive, and he dedicated it to Hermes after the war with the giants. It took root, and became a monster tree. Euripides called the club of Theseus EpiDaurian because he won it from the giant Pcrii'hetes whom he killed in ' One traditional distortion of his name is the Irish hedge-schoolboy's reading of P. Vergilii Maronis as Paddy Virgil the Mariner. - Exodus, vii, 12. Myths^ The Rod and Rliabdomancy. 6i EpiDauros. And Dauros of course is cognate with hopv, the spear ot Kronos. The riding of witches on sticks, if one reflects upon it, seems groundless nonsense until connected with the axis conception of the Rod. Of the two omentum-spits (vapashrapanis) for roast- ing the navel-fat at the sacrifices in the S atapatlia-bralunana^ one was quite straight, the other bifurcate on the top, which is like the rod used for water-finding and the uas sceptre. The beating of bounds (or of boys round bounds) with rods must not be forgotten. At the annual festival of Demeter at Pheneos in Arcadia the priest hid his face with the round cover of the petroma ( — the custom of looking in the hat is still kept up in English churches — ) and beat with rods the worshippers who filed before him.^ But this beating is also to be connected with some prior human sacrifice — perhaps beating to death with clubs. Ascension- 77;';/rjday is the date for bounds-beating with long willow wands peeled or not ; and the three days before it are rogation or asking days. The week is called the gang- (gangan, to go) or procession-week, a name as archaic as these pagan perambulations, which halted for worship at holy trees and wells. The connection of these processions with the ascension or re- ascension of a heaven-descended deity must again claim attention under the heading of " The Dokana." ' J. Eggeling's, ii, 194. - Pans, viii, 15, I. 62 The Night of the Gods. \_A xis 5. — The Flcur-dc-Lis at the point of the SURMOUNTED by the fleur-dc-Lis, the earth-Axis is depicted pointing to the North on almost every map of every country ; and the same symbol of the fleur-de-Lis is found universally on the needles of the most ancient mariner's compasses. " This Mariners Compasse," said Henry Peacham in his Coiiipleat Gentleman (1627) "hath the needle in manner of a Flowre-deluce which pointeth still to the North" (p. 65 j. With this must be bracketed the three-leafed wand of Hermes. Passing by for the moment its by no means inconsistent significance as the masculine emblem of fecundity, the most ancient Egyptian, Assyrian, Persian, Arabic, Armenian, Byzantine, and European examples ; whether on sceptres, crowns, helmets, coins, seals, or monuments ; whether in mosques or in tombs ; in art, in heraldry, in industry, or on playing-cards, show the fleur-de-Lis to be no lily-flower but a triple unison, the emblem of a triad. Its French renown is a mere modern vulgarisation, an adoption during the crusades and dating from Louis VH, about A.D, 1137. It is amusing to find that it was popularly believed that the directors of the Musee du Louvre had added the fleur-de-Lis to the first arrival of Nineveh antiquities as a base flattery of Louis XVIII. It is, I suggest, briefly the emblem of the Chinese Tai-Ki, the origin of all things, with the dual co-principles yin and yang, into which that origin opened or divided. Tai-ki, the Yin, and the Yang— in Japan the In-yo — form the triad represented by Hatori and Hirata in their cosmic diagrams. The primitive mode chosen b}' these Japanese commentators for the representation of the triad consists in three black spots shown at the upper portion of a large circle which figures the heavens. The pole-star is the upper part of the heavens, said _Hirata,' and must therefore have been the habitation of the three primeval kami or gods, who are (i) Ame no Minaka-Nushi,Lord ofthe Awful-centre of Heaven (not simply " of the middle," or " in the verj- centre," as it has been rendered), (2) Taka ]\Iimusubi, and (3) Kamu Mimusubi,or ' Mr. Sntmv's Pure Slnnto, 60. 61. Myiks.'\ The Fleur-de-Lis. 63 the ineffably-begotten Taka and Kamu.who can have no connection with the Sun, as has been surmised, but correspond to the Chinese yin and yang, while Tai-Ki is represented by the Japanese Centre- Lord. The true root-signification of Kamu is to be sought in kauii upper, whence god, and Taka is no more than taka height ; but both words are obviously adjectival names, and not empty honorifics, as the Japanese Shintoists now seem to think. It would be impossible fully to develop the remoteness and universality of the fleur-de- Lis emblem without reproducing a great portion of M. Adalbert de Beaumont's Essay on the subject, and some of its 438 well-chosen designs.^ Suffice it to say that the emblem is here traced farther even than he has followed it, for preoccupied by the flower idea he — in common with the late Franqois Lenormant — makes it the hom or haoma, the sacred plant, the tree of life of Mazdeism. As the haoma or world-Tree myth is in this Inquiry identified with that of the Universe-Axis, the conclusion reached by a totally independent path is, I find not without satisfaction, practically the same as that of M. de Beaumont, whose captivating Essay I did not read until this chapter was far advanced. If previous speculations be consulted^ it will probably be concluded that we have here too the long- sought origin of the Prince of Wales's Plume (as to which see also the heading of " Feathers"). The Irish emblem too, as well as the French, still retains its triune significance ; and thus, though it now grows underfoot, the Shamrock — the word is also in Persian — is to be carried back to the same supernal, universal origin. Wherever the white-skinned yellow-haired Welsh Olwen trod there sprang up four white trefoils.^ Here we have the shamrock and the footprint together. The symbolism of the four-leaved shamrock would refer to the cardinal points (see " The Four Living Creatures"). It may be seen in the palms and (more conventionally) on the breast of " the Buddha of Bengal, as a Brahminical avatar," in Moor's Hindil Pantheon (plate 75). hands [It should be noted that the Egyptian hieroglyph for East is % which might be thought to be the needle-point. This point is not clear to me.] ' Rechcrches sur Vorigine du Blason ; et en particidier siu- la Fkur de Lis. Paris, Leleux, 1853. ^ See, for instance, Frasei's Magazine for l88r. ■'' Rliys's Hib. Lects. 490. 64 The Night of the Gods. \Axi: xts The following emblems, analogous to or identical with the fleur- de-Lis are taken irom Moor's Hindu Pantheon. I. pendant lotus-blossom held by four-handed Vishnu (plate 75) "€0 ^^ lotus-blossoms, chaliced flowers that lie, on the surface of the waters whereon floats Narayana the Supreme Spirit "moving on the waters''' (plate 20) .... 3. held in left hand of Devi (goddess) consort of Shiva (plate 41) 4. these appear right and left of the head of the man-bird-god Garuda (plate 40) 5. three of the numerous sect-marks of Vishnu-worshippers (plate 2) 6. held by four-handed Devi-Bhavani . 7. on head-dress of Shiva-Bhairava (plate 95). Compare helmet from Nineveh, p. 64. . . r|6Tnj'^ 8. held by four-handed Vyaghra Yayi (plate 40) In the Rev. Dr. Wm. Wright's Empire of the Hittites, are drawings of several of the triple emblems resembling the fleur-de-Lis and the shamrock which are found among the Khetan (" Hittite ") sculptured characters of Asia Minor: ' Sir Monier Williams, Hiiidi'iisni, loi ; Mann, i, 10. Myths?^ The Fletir-de-Lis. 65 e^ There is another distinct type of flower-and-leaf " Hittite " emblems which may also have a triple significance, as well as a connection with the haoma or soma plant of eternal life : [Capt. Conder^ suggests that the first group (of three) mean life, and the second group (of three) signify male. The fourth of the third group he considers an Aaron's rod or sceptre ; and the fourth group mean grozvth he believes, or to live.l The fleur-de-Lis is shown clearly on the helmet-top of one of the colossal figures at an entrance of Kuyunjik, as engraved by Layard^ and now in the British Museum. See also No. 7 just below. Capt Conder notes the fleur-de-Lis as a frequent mason's- mark in Syria." A few ancient examples of the fleur-de-Lis are here added from De Beaumont : No. I is from a tomb at Teheran ; 2, from a Maroccan MS. of the Koran, xiith century ; 3, from a Kufic MS of the viiith century ; ' Altaic Hierogfyp/is, 65, 57, 102. ■ Nineveli and Babylon, 462. ^ Heth and Afoab, 56 66 The Night of the Gods. [Axis No. 4, Egyptian gold collar ornament ; 5, handle of an Egyptian wooden spoon ; 6, on crown of a sphinx ; 7, Royal helmet, Nineveh ; 8, Arab coin (from Marsden) ; 9, crown of King David — Saxon MS. of xith century, Brit. Mus. (from Twining's Symbols of Christian Art, 1885). The North and South emblems for Lower 'W and Upper "ff Egypt are triple (and tri-triple) like the fleur-de-Lis, and deserve notice.^ What is called by the art-experts a "lily" on a bishop's mitre of the xiiith century given by Du Sommerard in Lcs Arts dii Moyen Age, is clearly a fleur-de-Lis. An Arabic name for the star Arcturus (Somech- haramach) is properly Al-siniak al-ramih, " the prop that carries a spear "-head. Rumh" means the spear- head itself, and I think we thus have the clue to the true origin of the rhumbs of the compass, which has been such a fruitful source of discussions. The transfer of the word in treatises on navigation from the radius (spear) of the compass to the corresponding line steered on the globe by a ship seems to have been the origin of much of the confusion. Hues says (p. 127) that " those lines which a ship, following the direction of the magnetical needle, describeth on the surface of the sea, Petrus Nonius (Pedro Nunez, 1567) calleth in the Latin Rumbos, borrowing the appellation of his countrjTnen the Portugals ; which word, since it is now (1594-1638) generally received by learned writers to express them by, we also will use the same." And again (p. 130) "when a ship saileth according to one and the same rumbe (except it be one of the four principal and cardinal rumbes) it is a crooked and spiral line" she describes on the globe. Another similarly named star is Spica, the corrupt Arabic name for which, Hazimath al-hacel, is for Al-simak-al-a'zal, the unarmed prop. The Egyptian Ptah was the embodiment of organising motive power, the symbol of the ever-active fashioning generative energy developed from moisture, and M. de Beaumont easily identifies the fleur-de-Lis as the s^Tnbol of humidity, fecundity, strength, and kingly power. This accessory significance is attendant upon and concordant with the world-Axis conception. At times the two run parallel, and again they converge and coalesce. Thus while the Japanese savant Hirata, commenting on the collection of Ancient Matters called the Koski, represents the spear of Izanagi and Izanami as the earth-Axis, he also gives it the form of the lingam.^ A leading incident in this myth is ' Pierret : Diet. 199. - Hues's Tractatus