Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges Ecclesiastes Call I IRRARY 3 [ 3 I * I " i -a i * I CO THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA ENDOWED BY THE DIALECTIC AND PHILANTHROPIC SOCIETIES BSk91 • C3 v. 18 BARCODE ON BACK COVER This book is due at the LOUIS R. WILSON LIBRARY on the last date stamped under "Date Due." If not on hold it may be renewed by bringing it to the library. DATE RFT DIE RET DATE DIE D 5 . : ""7 jm ?<> w . i»5 Cijc CamfcnUjje Bible for ^cljoote anti CoIIccjcss. ECCLESIASTES; OR, THE PREACHER. ILonfton : C. J. CLAY and SONS, CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS WAREHOUSE, AVE MARIA LANE. ffilasgoto: 263, ARGYLE STREET. ILetpjtfl: F. A. BROCKHAUS. #eto gorfc: THE MACMILLAN COMPANY JSombau: E. SEYMOUR HALE. %\)t Cambridge 36tule for i^oote anti Colleges. General Editor :— J. J. S. PEROVVNE, D.D., Bishop of Worcester. ECCLESIASTES; OR, THE PREACHER, WITH NOTES AND INTRODUCTION BY THE LATE E. H. PLUMPTRE, D.D. DEAN OF WELLS. STEREOTYPED EDITION. AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS. 1898 [All Rights reserved.] First Edition 18S1. Reprinted 18S2, 1883, 1885, 1886, iSS8, 1890, 1892, 1S95, 1898. PREFACE BY THE GENERAL EDITOR. The General Editor of The Cambridge Bible for ScJiools thinks it right to say that he does not hold himself responsible either for the interpretation of particular passages which the Editors of the several Books have adopted, or for any opinion on points of doctrine that they may have expressed. In the New Testament more especially questions arise of the deepest theological import, on which the ablest and most conscientious interpreters have differed and always will differ. His aim has been in all such cases to leave each Contributor to the unfettered ^ exercise of his own judgment, only taking care that £ mere controversy should as far as possible be avoided. K He has contented himself chiefly with a careful ^ revision of the notes, with pointing out omissions, with vi PREFACE. suggesting occasionally a reconsideration of some question, or a fuller treatment of difficult passages, and the like. Beyond this he has not attempted to interfere, feeling it better that each Commentary should have its own individual character, and being convinced that freshness and variety of treatment are more than a compensation for any lack of uniformity in the Series. Deanery, Peterborough. PREFACE. Among the many enigmas of the Old Testament the book of Ecclesiastes is pre-eminently enigmatic. It comes before us as the sphinx of Hebrew literature, with its unsolved riddles of history and life. It has become almost a proverb that every interpreter of this book thinks that all previous interpreters have been wrong. Its very title has received some dozen discordant interpretations. The dates assigned to its authorship by competent experts range over very nearly a thousand years, from B.C. 990 to B.C. 10. Not less has been the divergence of opinion as to its structure and its aims. It has been regarded as a formal treatise, or as a collection of unconnected thoughts and maxims, like the Meditations of Marcus Aurelius, or Pascal's Pensees, or Hare's Guesses at Truth; or as a dialogue, though without the names of the interlocutors, after the manner of Plato; or like the discussions between the Dotto and the Ignora?ite, that form a prominent feature in the teaching of the Italian Jesuits, and in which the writer holds free debate with his opponents 1 . Those who take the latter view are, unfortu- nately, divided among themselves as to which interlocutor in the dialogue represents the views of the writer, and 1 See Ginsburg's exhaustive survey of the literature of Ecclesiastes in the Introdziction to his Commentary. Herder may be named as the author of the Dialogue theory, but he has been followed by many others. 8 PREFACE. which those that he is seeking to refute 1 . As to the drift of the book, we meet with every conceivable variety of hypothesis more or less skilfully maintained. Men have seen in it the confessions of the penitent and converted Solomon 2 , or a bitter cynical pasquinade on the career of Herod the Great 3 , or a Chesterfield manual of policy and politesse for those who seek their fortune in the palaces of kings 4 . It has been made to teach a cloistral asceti- cism 5 , or a healthy life of natural enjoyment , or a license like that of a St Simonian "rehabilitation of the flesh 7 ." Those who looked on one side of the shield have found in it a direct and earnest apologia for the doctrine of the immortality of the soul 8 ; those who approached it from the other were not less sure that it was a polemic protest against that doctrine as it was taught by Pharisees or Essenes 9 . The writer aimed at leading men to seek the things eternal, or sought to draw them away from the cloud- land of the unknown that men call eternity. Dogmatism and scepticism have alike claimed the author as their champion. It has been made to teach the mysteries of the Trinity and the Atonement 10 , or to rebuke the presumption that speculates on those mysteries. It has been identified 1 One school, e.g., maintains that the seemingly Epicurean senti- ments, anoiher that the gloomier views of life, are stated only to be rejected (Ginsburg, ut supra). 2 This is, I need hardly say, the current traditional interpretation of Jewish and Patristic and early Protestant writers (Ginsburg, ut supra). 3 Gratz, Comm. on Koheleth, p. 13. 4 Jacobi, quoted by Ginsburg, p. 186. 5 The view was that of Jerome, Augustine, and the whole crowd of Patristic and mediaeval interpreters. 6 Luther, Comm. on Eccles. 7 Gratz, Commentary, p. 26. 8 So most Patristic and early Protestant scholars; and Hengstenberg and Delitzsch among those of our own time. 9 So emphatically Gratz, p. 28. 10 See the Commentaries of Jerome, Augustine, and others of the same school, as collected by Pineda. PREFACE. alike with the Creed of Athanasius and with that of the Agnostic. Think, too, for a moment of the varying aspects which it presents to us when we come in contact with it, not as handled by professed interpreters, but as cropping up here and there in the pages of history, or the lives of individual men. We think of Gelimer, the Vandal king 1 , led in chains in the triumph of Belisarius, and, as he walked on without a tear and without a sigh, finding a secret consolation in the oft-echoed burden of " Vanitas vanitatuml omnia vanitas /" or of Jerome reading the book with his disciple Blaesilla, that he might persuade her to renounce those vanities for the life of the convent at Bethlehem 2 ; or of Thomas a. Kempis taking its watchword as the text of the De Imitatione Christi; or of Laud writing to Strafford when the policy of " Thorough " had broken down, and counselling him to turn for consolation to its pages 3 . We remember how Luther found in it a healthy Politica or (Economica, the very mirror of magistracy and active life, as contrasted with that of the monks and friars who opposed him 4 ; how Voltaire dedicated his paraphrase of it to Frederick II., as that of a book which was the king's favourite study 5 . It has, in the history of our own litera- ture, been versified by poets as widely contrasted as Quarles and Prior. It has furnished a name to the "Vanity Fair" of Bunyan and of Thackeray; and the latter in a character- istic poem 6 has moralized his song on the theme of its Mataiotes Mataioteion. Pascal found in it the echo of the restless scepticism which drove him to take refuge 1 Gibbon, c. XLI. - Hieron. Prcef. in Eccles. 3 Mozley, Essays, I. p. 60. 4 Luther, Prcef. in Eccks. 5 Voltaire, (Euvres, Vol. x. p. 258 (ed. 1819). G Thackeray, Ballads and Tales, 1869, p. 233. io PREFACE. from the uncertainty that tormented him apart from God, in the belief that God had revealed Himself, and that the Church of Rome was the witness and depository of that revelation 1 . Renan, lastly, looks on it as the only charming work — " le seul livre ai?7iable " — that has ever been written by a Jew, and with his characteristic insight into the subtle variations of human nature, strives to represent to himself St Paul in his declining years — if only he had been of another race and of another temperament, i.e. if he had been quite another Paul than we have known — as at last discovering, desillusiotine of the " sweet Galilean vision," that he had wasted his life on a dream, and turning from all the Prophets to a book which till then he had scarcely read, even the book Ecclesiastes 2 . It will be seen from the Introduction to this volume that I am not satisfied to rest altogether in any of these conclu- sions. I can honestly say that I have worked through the arguments by which the writers have supported them and have not found them satisfy the laws of evidence or the conditions of historical probability. It lies in the nature of the case that, as I have studied the book, month after month, I have felt its strangely fascinating and, so to speak, zymotic power, that side-lights have fallen on it now from this quarter and now from that, that suggestive coincidences have shewed themselves between its teaching and that of other writings in Hebrew, or Greek, or later literature, that while much remained that, like parts of St Paul's Epistles, was "hard to be understood" (2 Pet. iii. 16), much also seemed to become clear. The " maze " was not altogether "without a plan," and there was, at least, a partial clue to the intricate windings of the labyrinth. It 1 Pascal, Pensees, Vol. I. p. 159, ed. Molines. 2 Renan, V Antkhrist, p. 101. PREFACE. ii will be seen, in the course of the Introduction and the Notes that follow, that I have consulted most of the commentaries that were best worth consulting. It is not, I think, neces- sary to give a complete list of these or of other books which I have, in the course of my labours, laid under contribution, but I cannot withhold a special tribute of grateful admiration to the two works which have most helped me — the Commentary of Dr Ginsburg, the result of many years of labour, and characterized, as might be expected, by an exhaustive completeness; and that by Mr Tyler, which, though briefer, is singularly thoughtful and suggestive, and to which I am indeed indebted for the first impressions as to the date and character of the book, which have now ripened into convictions. Those convictions I now submit alike to students and to experts. They will clash, it may be, in some points with inherited and traditional opinions. I can but hope, how- ever, that those who are drawn to the study of the book may find in what I have written that which will help them to understand it better than they have done. They will find in it, if I mistake not, that it meets, and, we may believe, has been providentially designed to meet, the special tendencies of modern philosophical thought, and that the problems of life which it discusses are those with which our own daily experience brings us into contact. They will learn that the questions of our own time are those which vexed the minds of seekers and debaters in an age not unlike our own in its forms of culture, and while they recognize the binding force of its final solution of the problems, "Fear God and keep His commandments," on those who have not seen, or have not accepted the light of a fuller revelation, they will rejoice in the brightness of that higher revelation of the mind of God of which the Christian Church is the PREFACE. inheritor and the witness. If they feel, as they will do, that there is hardly any book of the Old Testament which pre- sents so marked a contrast in its teaching to that of the Gospels or Epistles of the New Testament, they will yet acknowledge that it is not without a place in the Divine Economy of Revelation, and may become to those who use it rightly a 7raiSay(oyos €ts Xpicrrov — a " schoolmaster leading them to Christ/' Bickley Vicarage, Oct. 23rd, 1880. CONTENTS. PAGES I. Introduction. Chapter I. The Title 15 — 19 Chapter I L Authorship and Dale [9 — 34 Chapter III. An Ideal Biogra phy 35 — 5 5 Chapter IV. Ecclesiastes and Ecclesiasticus -.6 — 66 Chapter V. Ecclesiastes and the Wisdom of Solo- mon 67 — 75 Chapter VI. Jewish interpreters of Ecclesiastes... 75 — 87 Chapter VII. Ecclesiastes and its Patristic inter- preters 88 — 97 Chapter VIII. Analysis of Ecclesiastes 97 — 101 II. Text and Notes 103—230 III. Appendix. 1. Koheleth and Shakespeare 231 — 249 2. Koheleth and Tennyson 250 — 261 3. A Persian Koheleth of the twelfth century ... 262 — 268 IV. Index 269—271 %* The Text adopted in this Edition is that of Dr Scrivener's Cambridge Paragraph Bible. A few variations from the ordi- nary Text, chiefly in the spelling of certain words, and in the use of italics, will be noticed. For the principles adopted by Dr Scrivener as regards the printing of the Text see his Intro- duction to *he Paragraph Bible, published by the Cambridge University Press. INTRODUCTION. CHAPTER I. THE TITLE. i. The name Ecclesiastes, by which the book before us is commonly known, comes to us from the Greek version of the Old Testament, known as the Septuagint (the version of the Seventy who were believed to have been the translators), as the nearest equivalent they could find to the Hebrew title Kohelefh. Jerome, the translator to whom we owe the Latin version known as the Vulgate, thought that he could not do better than retain the word, instead of attempting to translate it, and it has been adopted (in the title though not in the text) in the English and many other modern versions 1 . We are thrown back therefore upon the Hebrew word and we have, in the first instance, to ask what it meant, and why it was chosen by the author. In this enquiry we are met (i) by the fact that the word occurs nowhere else in the whole range of Old Testament literature, and the natural inference is that it was coined because the writer wanted a word more significant and adapted to his aim than any with which his native speech supplied him; possibly, indeed, because he wanted a word corre- sponding to one in a foreign language that was thus significant. 1 Luther gives Der Prediger Salomo, which the English version re- produces in its alternative title. i6 INTRODUCTION. Looking accordingly to the etymology of the Hebrew word we find that it is in form the feminine participle of an unused con- jugation of a verb Kdhal and as such would have a meaning connected with the root-idea of the verb, that of "gathering" or "collecting." The verb is always used in its other conjuga- tions of gathering persons and not things (Exod. xxxv. I ; Num. i. 18, viii. 9, xvi. 19, et al.), and from it is formed the noun which in our English version appears as "congregation" (Lev. iv. 14; Num. x. 7 ; Deut. xxiii. 1 et al.), "'assembly" (Num. xiv. 5 ; Deut. v. 22; Judges xx. 2 et al.) or "company" (Jer. xxxi. 8; Ezek. xvi. 40, xvii. 17 et al), while in the LXX it appears almost uniformly as Ecclesia. It is accordingly an all but certain inference that the meaning of the new-coined word was either "one who calls an assembly" or, looking to the usual force of the unused conjugation from which it is formed 1 , "one who is a member of an assembly." The choice of the feminine form may be connected with the thought that the writer wished to identify himself with Wisdom (a noun which was feminine in Hebrew as in other languages), who appears as teaching in the bold impersonation of Prov. i. 20, viii. 1 — 4. On the other hand the noun is always treated throughout the book (with, possibly, the solitary exception of chap. vii. 27, but see note there) as masculine, partly, perhaps, because the writer identified himself with the man Solomon as well as with the abstract wisdom, partly, it may be also, because usage had, as in the case of Sophereth (Neh. vii. 57), Pochereth (Ezra ii. 57), Alemeth and Azmaveth (1 Chron. viii. 36) sanctioned the employment of such feminine forms as the names of men. It follows from this that the LXX translators were at least not far wrong when they chose Ecclesiastes as the nearest equivalent for the Hebrew title of the book, Kohcleth. Our word "Preacher," however, which has been adopted from Luther, is altogether misleading. Taken in connexion with the associa- 1 The participle Koheleth is formed as if from the Kal conjugation, which commonly denotes intransitive state or action. No example of the verb Kdhal is found in this form. The two forms most in use are the transitive, "to gather," and the passive !< to be gathered." INTRODUCTION. tions which the very sound of Ecclesia in any of its compounds calls up, it suggests the idea of a teacher delivering a set discourse to a congregation of worshippers. That is, to say the least, an idea which it is hard to reconcile with the structure and contents of Koheleth. It may be added that it is just as foreign to the meaning of the Hebrew and Greek words. The verb Kahal is never used in connexion with the idea of vocal utterance of any kind. The Ecclesiastes was not one who called the Ecclesia or assembly together, or addressed it in a tone of didactic authority, but much rather one who was an ordinary member of such an as- sembly (the political unit of every Greek State) and took part in its discussions. He is, as Aristotle says, not an archon or a ruler {Pol. ill. 1 1), but a part of the great whole {Ibid.). So the Eccle- siazusai of Aristophanes are women who meet in an assembly to debate, and the word is used in the same sense by Plato {Gorg. p. 452, e). In the LXX, the word does not occur outside the book to which it serves as a title, and we have therefore no reason for thinking that they used it in any other than its ordinary sense. It follows from this that the more natural equivalent for it in English would be Debater rather than Preacher, and looking to the fact that the Hebrew writer ap- parently coined the word, it would be a natural inference that he did so, because he wanted a substantive which exactly expressed the idea of one who desired to present himself in that character and not as a teacher. He claimed only to be a member, one of many, of the great Ecclesia of those who think. If we could assume that he had any knowledge of Greek, it would be a legitimate inference that he formed the new word as an equivalent to the Ecclesiastes which had that significance. It is obvious that this is a meaning which fits in far more aptly with the nature of the book, its presentment of many views, more or less contrasted with each other, its ap- parent oscillation between the extremes of a desponding pes- simism and a tranquil Epicureanism. To use the title of a modern book with which most readers are. familiar, the writer speaks as one who takes his part in a meeting of Friends in Council. ECCLESIASTES 2 i8 INTRODUCTION. The true meaning of the title having thus been established, both on philological grounds and as being in harmony with the character of the work itself, it will be sufficient to note briefly the other meanings which have been assigned to it by different scholars, (a) It cannot mean, as Grotius thought, one who was a avvadpoiaTris {sy?iathroistes) a collector sententiarum or "com- piler," one who does not maintain a theory or opinion of his own but brings together those of other thinkers ; for this, though it agrees fairly with the nature of the contents of the book, is incompatible with the fact that the Hebrew verb is used, without exception, in the sense of collecting, or calling together, persons and not things, (b) More, perhaps, is to be said for Ginsburg's view (Koheleth, Introd. p. 2) that the title expresses the act of bringing together those that have been scattered, assembling men, as the historical Solomon assembled them, to meet as in the Divine presence (1 Kings viii. 1 — 5), calling back those that have wandered in the bye- ways of doubt, "a gatherer of those far off to God." The word thus taken expresses the thought which was uttered in the words of the true Son of David: "How often would I have gathered thy children together ,: (Matt, xxiii. 34 ; Luke xiii. 34). It is, however, against this view, that the writer forms the word Koheleth as has been said above, from a conjugation not in use (Kal), which would naturally express being in a given state or position, and passes over the conjugation which was in use (Hiphil) and expressed the transitive act of bringing into such a position or state. To that latter form belongs, in this case, the meaning of "gathering together" into an assembly. It can scarcely be questioned that the writer's motive in not using it, when it was ready to his hand, was that he deliberately sought to avoid the sense of "gathering an assembly," and coined a word, which, as the lxx translators rightly felt, conveyed the sense of being a member of such an assembly and taking part in its proceedings. (c) Jerome's view, followed as we have seen by Luther, that the word describes a concionator or "preacher" is that also of the Midrash Rabba (a Jewish commentary of uncertain date, but not earlier than the sixth, nor later than the twelfth century, INTRODUCTION. 19 Steinschneider, Jewish Literature, p. 53) which explains the name as given by Solomon, "because his discourses were de- livered before the congregation" (Ginsburg, p. 3, Wiinsche, Midr. Koh. p. 2), but this also, as shewn above, is both wrong etymologically and at variance with the character of the book. (d) The word cannot mean, as a few commentators have thought, "one who has been gathered," as describing the state of the repentant and converted Solomon, for this would involve a grammatical solecism in the opposite direction to that already examined, and would assign a passive meaning to a form essentially active, though not factitive, in its force, (e) Other more far-fetched interpretations, resting on hazardous Arabic etymologies, as that the word meant "penitent" or "the old man," or "the voice that cries," maybe dismissed, as not calling for any serious discussion. CHAPTER II. AUTHORSHIP AND DATE. i. It lies on the surface that the writer of the book, who, though he does not introduce the name of Solomon, identifies himself (ch. i. 12 — 16) with the historical son of David, was either actually the king of Israel whose name was famous for "wisdom and largeness of heart" or that, for some reason or other, he adopted the dramatic personation of his character as a form of authorship. On the former hypothesis, the question of date is settled together with that of authorship, and the book takes its place almost among the earliest treasures of Hebrew literature, side by side with the Psalms that actually came from David's pen and with the inner kernel of the Book of Proverbs. On the latter a wide region of conjecture lies opens to us, from any date subsequent to that of Solomon to the time when we first get distinct traces of the existence of the book, and the problem, in the absence of external evidence, will have to be decided on 2 — 2 20 INTRODUCTION. the ground of internal notes of time and place as seen in the language, thought, and structure of the book. A preliminary question meets us, however, which turns, not upon evidence either external or internal, but upon an a priori assumption. It has been urged that when a writer adopts a personated authorship he is guilty of a fraudulent imposture, that such an imposture is incompatible with any idea of inspiration, however loosely that inspiration may be defined, and that to assume a personated authorship is therefore to assert that the book has no right to the place it occupies in the Canon of the Old Testa- ment 1 . On this view Ecclesiastes, if not written by Solomon, takes its place on the same level as Ireland's Vorligern, or Chatterton's Rowley, or Macpherson's Ossian. It may fairly be said, however, of this view that it ignores the fact that a dramatic personation of character has, at all times, been looked upon as a legitimate form of authorship, not necessarily involving any ani- mus decipiendi. With some writers of the highest genius, as e.g., with Robert Browning and Tennyson, a monologue or soliloquy of this character has been a favourite form of composition. The speeches in Herodotus and Thucydides, the Apologies written in the name of Socrates by Xenophon and Plato, the Dialogues of Plato throughout, are instances in which no one would dream of imputing fraud to the writers, though in all these cases we have, with scarcely the shadow of a doubt, the thoughts and words of the writers and not of the men whom they represent as speaking. The most decisive, and in that sense, crucial in- stance of such authorship is found, however, in the book which presents so striking a parallel to Ecclesiastes, the Apocryphal Wisdom of Solomon. There also, both in the title and the body of the book (Wisd. vii. 5, 7, ix. 7, 8) the writer identifies himself with the Son of David. It was quoted by early Greek and Latin fathers as by Solomon (Clem. Alex. Strom. VI. n, 14, 15 ; TertulL Adv. Valent. c. 2 ; De Pressor. Hceret. c. 7). From 1 The argument may be found in most English Commentaries, but see especially an elaborate treatise on The Authorship of Ecclesiastes, pp. 1 — 12 (Macmillan and Co., 1880). INTRODUCTION. the time of the Muratorian Fragment 1 , it has been commonly ascribed to Philo or some other writer of the Alexandrian school of Jewish thought 2 . No one now dreams of ascribing it to Solomon. No one has ever ventured to stigmatize it as a fraudulent imposture. It has been quoted reverentially even by Protestant writers, cited as Scripture by many of the Fathers, placed by the Church of Rome in the Canon of Scripture {Cone. Trident. Sep. IV. de Can. Script), and recognized by Church of England critics as entitled to a high place of honour among the books which they receive as deutero-canonical (Art. VI.). In the face of these facts it can scarcely be said with any pro- bability that we are debarred from a free enquiry into the evidence of the authorship of Ecclesiastes, other than the state- ment of ch. i. 12, or that we ought to resist or suppress the conclusion to which the evidence may point, should it tend to a belief that Solomon was not the author. If dramatic persona- tion be, in all times and countries, a legitimate method of in- struction, there is no a priori ground against the employment of that method by the manifold and "very varied wisdom" (the ttoXvttolkiXos aocpia of Eph. iii. io) of the Eternal Spirit. It may be added that this is, at least, a natural interpretation of the structure of the Book of Job. It can hardly be supposed that that work is the report of an actual dialogue. Returning to the enquiry accordingly, we may begin by ad- mitting freely that the Solomonic authorship has in its favour the authority of both Jewish and Christian tradition. The Midrash Koheleth {— Commentary on Ecclesiastes, probably, as has been said above, between the sixth and twelfth centuries) represents the opinions of a large number of Rabbis, all of whom 1 The words of the Fragment as they stand are " Et safiientia ab amicis in honorem ipsins scrifita," but it has been conjectured that this was a blundering translation of the Greek virb QVkwvos ("by Philo "), which the writer mistook for virb ;z), has its parallel in the apathy and contempt of the world which characterised the teaching of the Stoics when they taught that they were transient " as the flight of a swift-winged bird ;" and that all human things (to. dvOpto-mva) were "as a vapour, and as nothingness" (Marc. Aur. Meditt. VI. 15, x. 31). The Stoic destiny (ei/iap/xf'1/77), and the consequent calm acceptance of the inevitable, on which the Stoic prided himself, is echoed in the teaching of Koheleth as to the events that come to man by a power which his will cannot control, the " time and chance " that happeneth alike to all (chs. viii. 8, ix. 1 1). The stress laid on the common weaknesses of mankind as being of the nature of in- INTRODUCTION. 31 sanity, as in the frequently recurring combination of " madness and folly" (see Notes on chs. i. 17, ii. 12, vii. 25, x. 13), is altogether in harmony with the language of the Stoics (Diog. Laert. vii. 124). Nor are the traces of the teaching of Epicurus less dis- tinctly visible. We know that teaching indeed mainly through later writers, and the "many books" of the great Master himself have perished altogether, but for that very reason we know per- haps better than if we had the latter only, what were the points of his system which most impressed themselves on the minds of his followers. Lucretius and Horace are for us the representa- tives of Epicurean thought as Epictetus and Marcus Aurelius are of Stoic, and the parallelisms of language and idea which these writers present to the book now before us, may legitimately suggest the conclusion that they drank from a common source. We note accordingly that the Debater is acquainted with the physical science of Epicurus as represented by Lucretius. They speak in almost identical terms of the phenomena of the daily rising and setting of the sun, of the rivers flowing into the sea, and returning to their source (see Note on i. 5, 6). Their language as to the dispersion at death of the compound ele- ments of man's nature (see Notes on chs. iii. 19, 20, xii. 7) ; as to our ignorance of all that comes after death (see Note on ch. iii. 21); as to the progress of man in the arts of civilized life (see Note on ch. vii. 29); as to the nature of man standing, as far as we know, on the same level as that of beasts (see Note on ch. iii. 18, 19), presents an identity of tone, almost even of phrase. Still more in accord with popular Epicureanism as represented by Horace is the teaching of Koheleth as to the secret of enjoyment, consisting in the drapa^la (tranquillity) of a well regulated life (chs. ii. 24, iii. 22, v. 18, ix. 7), in the avoidance of passionate emotions and vain ambitions, and anxious cares, in learning to be content with a little, but to accept and use that little with a deliberate cheer- fulness (chs. v. 11, 12, 19, vii. 14). Even the pessimism of the Epicurean, from which he vainly seeks to find a refuge in this pococtirante life, is echoed by the Debater. The lamentations over the frailty and shortness of man's life (ch. vi. 4, 5, 12), over 32 INTRODUCTION. the disorders which prevail in nature and in society (chs. v. 8, vii. 7, viii. 9, 14, ix. 16, x. 16 — 18), the ever-recurring burden of the "vanity of vanities" (chs. i. 2, 17, ii. 26,1V. 16, viii. 10, ix.9,xi. 10, xii. 8), are all characteristic of the profounder tendencies of the same school, which culminated in the "tanta stat fircedita culpa" of Lucretius (11. 181). But it is not only in its affinity with the later philosophical systems of Greece that we find a proof of the later date of Ecclesiastes. It is throughout absolutely saturated with Greek thought and language. In the characteristic phrase of "under the sun" to express the totality of human things (see Notes on chs. i. 14, iv. 15, vi. 1, ix. 3), of "seeing the sun" for living (see Notes on chs. vi. 5, xi. 7), in the reference to the current maxims of Greek thought, the MrjSev ayav (" Nothing in excess") in ch. vii. 16, in the stress on opportuneness (naipos) in ch. iii. 1—8, in the "many books" of ch. xii. 12, recalling the 300 volumes of the writings of Epicurus, and the 400 of his disciple Apollodorus, and the 200,000 of the library at Alexandria, in the characteristic, " Who knows ?" of the rising school of Scepticism in ch. iii. 21, in the cynical disparagement of women which made Euripides known as the misogynist, and cast its dark shadow over Greek social life (see. Note on ch. vii. 28), in the allusive reference to a Greek proverb in the "bird in the air" that reports secrets (see Note on ch. x. 20), in the goads as representing the stimulating effect of all true teaching (see Note on ch. xii. 11), perhaps also in the knowledge shewn (see Note on ch. xii. 5) of the Greek pharmacopoeia, — in all this evidence, in its cumulative force, we find what compels us to admit that the book could not well have been written before the schools of the Garden and the Porch had obtained a prominent position, i.e. not earlier than B.C 250. With less confidence I bring before the reader the substance of Mr Tyler's argument as to the probable limits of the period within which Ecclesiastes may have been written {Ecclesiastes, Introd. § 5). The earlier of these limits he fixes as above, at about B.C. 250. The later he finds in the coinci- dence between it and the book known as the Wisdom of the Son of Sirach, the Ecclesiasticus of the English Apocrypha. INTRODUCTION. 33 I present these, as he gives them, and leave the reader to judge of their evidential force 1 . Eccles. vii. 13 — 15 and Ecclus. xxxiii. 13 — 15. Eccles. viii. r Ecclus. xiii. 25, 26. Eccles. x. 11 Ecclus. xii. 13. Eccles. vii. 20 — 22 Ecclus. xix. 16. Eccles. x. 2, 3, 12 — 14 Ecclus. xx. 7, xxi. 25, 26. Eccles. x. 8 Ecclus. xxvii. 26. Eccles. vii. 27 Ecclus. xxxiii. 15. Eccles. i. 7 Ecclus. xl. 11. Assuming these resemblances to imply derivation and that Ecclesiasticus was the later book of the two, and identifying the Euergetes of his grandson's Preface with Ptolemy Physcon, Mr Tyler concludes that the book now before us could not well have been written before B.C. 200 and is inclined to name B.C. 180 as the most probable date. From this point of view the name given to the latter book in the earliest Latin Version, from which it passed into the Vulgate, is not altogether with- out significance. The term Ecclesiasticus presupposes that the book was looked on as following in the wake of Ecciesiastes, belonging to the same class of didactic literature. It is, of course, true that another account of the name was given by patristic writers (Rufinus, Cotnm. in Symb. c. 38) and has been adopted by many modern scholars (Westcott in Sviittis Diet, of Bible, Art. Ecclesiasticus), as though it meant that the book was an "Ecclesiastical" one in the later sense of the word as con- trasted with " canonical," fit to be read in the Ecclesia though not of authority as a rule of faith. Looking, however, to the fact that there was a book already current in which the word Ecciesiastes was distinctly used in its pre-Christian sense, it is a more natural conclusion to infer that the old meaning was kept in view and that the book was therefore named with the significance now suggested. This is at all events in harmony with the use which the writer himself makes of the word Ecclesia, — in ch. xxxviii. 33, when he says of the unlearned workers of the world that they "shall not sit high in the congregation," i.e. 1 The subject is more fully discussed in ch. iv. ECCLESIASTES 3 34 INTRODUCTION. in the ecdesia, or academy of sages, and falls in with Mr Tyler's theory that his work was more or less influenced by Eccle- siastes. Another commentator (Hitzig) is led to the same con- clusion on different grounds. In the picture of the political evils of which the writer complains in ch. iv. 13, vii. 10, 26, or of a young and profligate one in ch. x. 16, he finds definite allu- sions to the history of Egypt under Ptolemy Philopator and Ptolemy Epiphanes respectively, and, although it may be ad- mitted that the references are not sufficiently definite to esta- blish the point, if taken by themselves, yet, as supervening on other evidence, it will be felt, I think, that they have a con- siderable corroborating force. As the result to which these lines of inference converge we have accordingly to think of Ecclesiastes as written somewhere between B.C. 240, the date of the death of Zeno, and B.C. 181, that of the death of Ptolemy Epiphanes. III. A recent critic (Gratz) has gone a step further, assigning the book to the reign of Herod the Great, and treats it as practi- cally in part a protest against the mal-administration of his govern- ment, and in part a polemic against the rising asceticism of the Essenes. I cannot say, however, that the arguments which he advances in support of this hypothesis seem to me sufficiently weighty to call in this place for examination in detail .some of them will find mention in the notes), and they are, to say the least, far outweighed by the evidence that has led Tyler and Hitzig, travelling on distinct lines of investigation, to their conclusion. It remains, with this date, thus fairly established, to enquire into the plan and purpose of the book, its relation to the en- vironment of the time, to earlier and to later teaching in the same region of thought. The peculiar character of the book, its manifest reproduction, even under the dramatic personation of its form, of a real personal experience, has led me to think that I can do this more effectively in the form of an ideal biography of the writer, based upon such data as the book itself presents, than by treating the subject in the more systematic way which would be natural in such a treatise as the present. To thai biography I accordingly now invite the attention of the reader. INTRODUCTION. 35 CHAPTER III. AN IDEAL BIOGRAPHY. It would be a comparatively easy task, of course, to write the life of the traditional author of Ecclesiastes. The reign of Solomon " in all his glory " and with all his wisdom has often furnished a subject both for the historian and the poet. There would be a special interest, if we could treat the book before us as leading us into the region that lies below the surface of history, and find in it an autobiographical fragment in which the royal writer laid before us his own experience of life and the conclusions to which he had been led through it. The Con- fessions of Solomon would have on that assumption a fascination not less powerful than those of Augustine or Rousseau. For the reasons which have been given in the preceding chapter, I cannot adopt that conclusion, and am compelled to rest in the belief that Ecclesiastes was the work of an unknown writer about two hundred years before the Christian era. To write his life under such conditions may seem a somewhat adventurous enterprise. One is open to the charge of evolving a biography out of one's inner consciousness, of summoning a spectral form out of the cloudland of imagination. I have felt, however, looking to the special character of the book, that this would be a more satisfactory way of stating the view that I have been led to hold as to the occasion, plan, and purpose of the book than the more systematic dissertation with which the student is familiar in Commentaries and Introductions. The book has so little of a formal plan, and is so much, in spite of the personated authorship, of the nature of an autobiographical confession, partly, it is clear, deliberate, partly, perhaps, to an extent of which the writer was scarcely conscious, betraying its true nature beneath the veil of the character he had assumed, that the task of portraying the lineaments that lie beneath the veil is comparatively easy. As with the Pensees of Pascal or of 3—2 36 INTRODUCTION. Joubert, or the So?mets of Shakespeare, we feel that the very- life of the man stands before us, as votivd...veluti descripta tabelld, in all its main characteristics. We divine the incidents of that life from the impress they have left upon his character, and from chance words in which more is meant than meets the ear. Koheleth (I shall use the name by anticipation, as better than the constant repetition of "the writer," or "the subject of our memoir") was born, according to the view stated above, some- where about B. c. 230. He was an only son, " one alone and not a second," without a brother (ch. iv. 8). His father lived in Judaea 1 , but not in Jerusalem, and to find "the way to the city," the way which none but the proverbial " fool " among grown-up men could miss, came before the child's mind at an early age as the test of sagacity and courage (ch. x. 18). The boy's educa- tion, however, was carried on in the synagogue school of the country town near which he lived, and was rudimentary enough in its character, stimulating a desire for knowledge which it could not satisfy. He learnt, as all children of Jewish parents learnt, the Shema or Creed of Israel, " Hear, O Israel, the Lord thy God is one Lord" (Deut. vi. 4), and the sentences that were written on the Phylacteries which boys, when they reached the age of thirteen and became Children of the Law, wore on their forehead and their arms. He was taught many of the Proverbs which proclaimed that " the fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge " (Prov. i. 7), and learnt to reverence Solomon as the ideal pattern of the wisdom and largeness of heart that grow out of a wide experience (1 Kings iv. 29). But it was a time of com- parative deadness in the life of Israel. The last of the prophets had spoken some two centuries before, and there were few who studied his writings or those of his predecessors. The great masters of Israel and teachers of the Law had not yet raised the fabric of tradition which was afterwards embodied in the Talmud. The expectations of the Anointed King were for the time dormant, and few were looking for "redemption in Jeru- 1 So Ewald, Introd. to Ecclesiasleu INTRODUCTION. salem" or for "the consolation of Israel." Pharisees and Sadducees and Essenes, though the germs of their respective systems might be found in the thoughts of men, were not as yet stimulating the religious activity of the people by their rivalry as teachers. The heroic struggle of the Maccabees against the idolatry of Syria was as yet in the future, and the early history of the nation, the memories of Abraham and Isaac and Jacob, did not kindle the patriotic enthusiasm which they came to kindle afterwards. There was a growing tendency to fall into the modes of thought and speech and life of the Greeks and Syrians with whom the sons of Abraham were brought into contact. Even the sacred name of Jahveh or Jehovah, so precious to their fathers, had dropped into the background, and] men habitually spoke of "God," or "the Creator," after the manner of the Greeks (ch. xii. i). It was a time, such as all nations and Churches have known, of conventionality and routine. The religion of the people, such as the boy saw it, was not such as to call out any very deep enthusiasm. The i wealth of his parents had attracted a knot of so-called devout persons round them, and his mother had come under their influence, and in proportion as she did so, failed to gain any hold on her son's heart, and left no memory of a true pattern of womanhood for him to reverence and love. Even she formed no exception in after years to the sweeping censure in which he declared that among all the women he had met he had never known one who satisfied his ideal of what a true woman should be (ch. vii. 28). The religionists who directed her con- science called each other by the name of "Friend," "Brother," or " Companion," and claimed to be of those of whom Malachi had spoken, " who feared the Lord and spake often one to another" (Mai. iii. 16). Koheleth saw through their hypocrisy, watched them going to the house of God, i.e., to temple or synagogue (Ps. lxxiv. 8), and heard their long and wordy and windy prayers — the very sacrifice of fools (ch. v. 1, 2). He saw how they made vows in time of sickness or danger, and then, when the peril had passed away, came before the priest, on whom they looked as the messenger or angel of the Lord, with 38 INTRODUCTION, frivolous excuses for its non-fulfilment (ch. v. 4 — 6) ; how they told their dreams as though they were an apocalypse from heaven (ch. v. 7). It was necessary to find a phrase to dis- tinguish the true worshippers from these pretenders, and just as men, under the influence of the maxim that language was given to conceal our thoughts, came to speak of la verite vraie as different from the ordinary verity so Koheleth could only express his scorn of the hypocrites by contrasting them, as with the emphasis of iteration, with " those who fear God, who indeed fear before him" (ch. viii. 12). As Koheleth grew to years of manhood, he was called to take his part in the labours of the cornfield and the vineyard. The wealth of his father did not lead him to bring up his son to a soft-handed leisure, for men had not then ceased to recognize the blessedness of toil, and it had become a proverb that a father who does not teach his sons to labour with their hands teaches them to be thieves. The teachers of Israel remembered that the " king himself was served by the field " (ch. v. 9) and "despise not husbandry" was one of the maxims of the wise. In after years, when pleasure had brought satiety and weariness, and dainties palled on the palate, Koheleth looked back regret- fully on that " sweet sleep " of the labour of earlier days, which followed on the frugal, or even scanty, meal (ch. v. 12). As he grew up to manhood, however, there came a change. Like the younger son in the parable (Luke xv. 12) he desired to see the world that lay beyond the hills, beyond the waters, and asked for his portion of goods and went his way into a far country. Among the Jews, as among the Greeks, and partly, indeed, as a consequence of their intercourse with them, this had come to be regarded as one of the paths to wisdom and largeness of heart. So the Son of Sirach wrote a little later : "A man that hath travelled knoweth many things." " He shall serve among great men, and appear before princes ; he will travel through strange countries ; for he hath tried the good and evil among men " (Ecclus. xxxiv. 9, xxxix. 4. Comp. Homer, Od. 1. 3). And if a Jew travelled anywhere at that period, it was aimost a matter of course that he should direct INTRODUCTION. 39 his steps to Alexandria. Intercourse between the two nations of Egypt and Judah was, indeed, no new thing. Psammetichus, in the days of Manasseh, had invited Jews to settle in his kingdom 1 . There had been Israelites "beyond the rivers of Ethiopia" in the days of Josiah (Zeph. iii. 10). Alexander, in founding the new city which was to immortalize his name, had followed in the footsteps of Psammetichus. The first of the Ptolemies had brought over many thousands, and they occupied a distinct quarter of the city 2 . Philadelphus had, as the story ran, invited seventy-two of the elders of Israel to his palace that they might translate their Law as an addition to the treasures of his library, had received them with all honour, and invited them to discuss ethical ques- tions day by day with the philosophers about his couit 3 . A wealthy Jew coming to such a city, not without introductions, was sure to be well received, and Koheleth sought and found admission to that life of courts, which the Son of Sirach pointed out as one of the paths of wisdom (Ecclus. xxxix. 4). It was a position not without its dangers. It tempted the Jew to efface his nationality and his creed, and his hopes in the far-off future. It tempted him also to exchange the purity to which he was pledged by the outward symbol of the covenant and by the teaching of his home life, for the license of the Greek. Koheleth for a time bowed his neck to the yoke of a despotic monarch, and learnt the suppleness of the slaves who dare not ask a king, What doest thou? (ch. viii. 4). He watched the way the court winds blew, and learnt to note the rise and fall of favourites and ministers (ch. x. 67). He saw or heard how under Ptolemy Philopator the reins of power had fallen into the hands of his mistress, Agathoclea, and her brother ; how the long minority of his son Epiphanes had been marked by the oppression of the poor and "violent perverting of judgment and justice" in the provinces (ch. v. 8), by all the evils which come on a land when its "king is a child" and its "princes revel in the morning" (ch. x. 16, 17) 4 . He had seen the pervading power of a system 1 Letter of Pseudo-Aristeas. 2 Joseph. Ant. xn. r. 3 Letter of Pseudo-Aristeas. 4 Justin, xxx. 1. 40 INTRODUCTION. of police espionage, which carried what had been spoken in whispers to the ears of the ruler (ch. x. 20). A training such as this could scarcely fail to make the man who was subject to it something less of an Israelite — to turn his thoughts from con- templating the picture which the prophets had drawn of a true and righteous King, to the task of noting the humours of kings who were neither true nor righteous, and flattering them with an obsequious homage, in the belief that "yielding" in such a case " pacifieth great offences " (ch. x. 4) *. Temptations of another kind helped to complete the evil work. The wealth of Koheleth enabled him to surround himself with a certain magnificence, and he kept before himself the ideal of a glory like that of Solomon's : the wine sparkled at his ban- quets, and singing men and singing women were hired to sing songs of revelry and love, and the Greek hetTa to /xr]8iv. " All is a jest, and all is dust, and all is nothingness." From the earlier sages he learnt the maxims that had become the ornaments of school-boys' themes, and yet were new to him — the doctrine of the Mrjbev ayav, "nothing in excess" (the "Surtout, point de zele" of Talleyrand); the not being "over- much righteous or overmuch wicked" (ch. vii. 16). From Chilon he learnt to talk of the time, or Kaipos, that was fixed for all things, of opportuneness, as almost the one ethical criterion Diodorus, I. 49. INTRODUCTION. 45 of human action (ch. iii. 1 — 11). He caught up the phrase "under the sun" as expressing the totality of human life (ch. i. 9, and thirty other passages). It was, however, to the philosophy of Greece, as represented by the leading sects of Stoics and Epicureans, that he turned with most eagerness. The former had in its teaching much that attracted him. That doctrine of recurring cycles of pheno- mena, not in the world of outward nature only, but of human life, history repeating itself, so that there is nothing new under the sun (ch. i. 9, 10), gave to him, as it did afterwards to Aurelius, a sense of order in the midst of seemingly endless changes and perturbations, and led him to look with the serene tranquillity of a Nil admirari at the things that excited men's ambition or roused them to indignation. If oppression and corruption had always been the accompaniments of kingly rule, such as the world had then known it, why should he wonder at the "violent perverting of justice and judgment in a province" under an Artaxerxes or a Ptolemy? (ch. v. 8). From the follow- ers of Zeno he learnt also to look on virtue and vice in their intellectual aspects. The common weaknesses and follies of mankind were to him, as to them, only so many different forms and degrees of absolute insanity (chs. i. 17, ii. 12, vii. 25, ix. 3). He studied "madness and folly" in that mental hospital as he would have studied the phenomena of fever or paralysis. The perfect ideal calm of the Stoic seemed a grand thing to aim at : as much above the common life of men as light is above dark- ness (ch. ii. 13). The passion, or the fashion, of Stoicism, however, soon passed away. That iteration of events, the sun rising every day, the winds ever blowing, the rivers ever flowing, the endless repetition of the follies and vices of mankind (ch. i. 5 — 8), became to him, as the current of the Thames did to the jaded pleasure-seeking duke who looked on it from his Richmond villa 1 , unspeakably wearisome. It seemed to mock him with the thought of monotony where he had hoped to find the pleasure of variety. It mocked him also with the thought of the permanence of nature, or even of the mass of human existence Cox's Quest of the Chief Good, p. Si. 46 INTRODUCTION. considered as part of nature, and the fleeting nothingness of the individual life. The voice of the rivulet — "Men may come and men may go, But I go on for ever" brought no pleasant music to his ear. And, to say the truth, the lives of the Stoics of Alexandria did not altogether commend their system to him. They talked much of the dignity of virtue, and drew fine pictures of it ; but when he came to know them, they were as vain, irritable, egotistic, sometimes even as sordid and sensual, as the men whom they despised. Each man was, in his own eyes, and those of his little coterie, as a supreme sage and king, almost as a God. There was something in them like the mutual apotheosis of which Heine complained in the pantheistic followers of Fichte and of Schelling 1 . Against that system, which ended in making every man his own deity, there rose in the heart of the Israelite, who had not altogether forgotten the lessons of his earlier life, a protest which clothed itself in the words, "Fear thou God" (ch. viii. 12, 13). And so Koheleth turned from the Porch to the Garden. It was at least less pretentious, and did not mock him with its lofty ideal of an unattained and unattainable perfection. Even the physics and physiology of the school of Epicurus were not without their attractions for a mind eager in the pursuit of knowledge of all kinds. Their theory of the circulation of the elemental forces, the rivers flowing into the sea yet never filling it, but returning as through arteries and veins, filtered in their progress from the sea's saltness, to the wells and fountains from which they had first sprung to light (ch- i. 5 — 7) ; their study of the growth of the human embryo, illustrated as it was by dissections in the Museum of Alexandria'^, shewing how the "bones grow in the womb of her that is with child" (ch. xi. 5); their discoveries, not quite anticipating Harvey, yet on the same track, as to the action of the heart and the lungs, the lamp of life suspended by 1 Stigand's Life of Heine, II. p. 162. 2 Dissection, and even vivisection, were first practised in the medical schools of Alexandria. — Quarterly Review, lxvi. p. 162. INTRODUCTION. 47 its silver chain, the pitcher drawing every moment fresh draughts from the fountain of the water of life (ch. xii. 6) 1 ; all this came to him as a new interest, a new pleasure. It was as fascinating, that wonderland of science, as a new poem or a new mythos, or, in modern phrase, as a new novel or romance. And then its theory of life and death, did not that seem to point out to him the secret of a calm repose? The life of man was as the life of brutes (ch. iii. 19). His soul was compound, and so discerptible. All things had been formed out of the eternal atoms, and into the eternal atoms all things were evermore resolved. Admitting even, for the sake of hypothesis, that there was something more than the forms of matter which are palpable and visible in man's nature, some vital force or ethereal spark, yet what had been brought together at birth was, at any rate, certain to be dissolved at death. Dust to dust, the ether which acted in man's brain to the ether of the infinite azure, was the inevitable end (ch. iii. 21, but not xii. 7). Such a view of life served at least to strip death of the terror with which the deio-idainovLa, the superstition, the Aberglaube, of men had clothed it. It did not leave him to dread the passage into the dim darkness of Sheol, the land of the shadow of death, as Hezekiah (Isa. xxxviii. 11, 18) and the Psalmist (Psa. vi. 5, xxx. 9, lxxxviii. 11) had dreaded it (ch. ix. 10). It freed him from the terrors of the Gehenna of which his countrymen were beginning to talk, from the Tartarus and Phlegethon and Cocytus, the burning and the wailing rivers, in which the Greeks who were outside the philosophic schools still continued to believe. It left him free to make the most and the best of life. And then that "best of life" was at once a pleasant and an attainable ideal. It con- firmed the lessons of his own experience as to the vanity and hollowness of much in which most men seek the satisfaction of their desires. Violent emotions were followed by a reaction, the night's revel by the morning headache; ambition and the favour of princes ended in disappointment. What the wise man should strive after was just the maximum of enjoyment, not over- 1 I purposely refrain from including the other anatomical references which men have found in Eccles. xii. 4, 5, 48 INTRODUCTION. balanced by the amari aliquid that rises even medio de fonte leporum — a life like that of the founder of the school — moderate and even abstemious, not disdaining the pleasures of any sense, yet carrying none to an excess. He had led a life of calm serene tranquillity, almost one of total abstinence and vegetarianism, and so the arapa^la which had become identified with his name, had been protracted to extreme old age 1 . The history of men's lives had surely "nothing better" to show than this. This, at any rate, was good (ch. iii. 12, 14, 22, v. 18, viii. 15). In such a life there was nothing that the conscience condemned as evil. It admitted even of acts of kindness and benevolence, as bring- ing with them a moral satisfaction (chs. vii. 1, 2, xi. 1, 2), and therefore a new source of enjoyment. Even the sages of Israel would have approved of such a life (Pro v. v. 15 — 19, xxx. 7), though it might not satisfy the heroic aspirations and high-soar- ing dreams of its prophets. Enjoyment itself might be received as a gift from God (ch. ii. 26, v. 19). Into this new form of life accordingly Koheleth threw himself, and did not find it altogether a delusion. Inwardly it made him feel that life was, after ail, worth living (ch. xi. 7). He began to find the pleasure of doing good, and visiting the fatherless and widow in their affliction. He learnt that it was better to go to the house of mourning than to the house of feasting. The heart of the wise was in that house and not in the house of mirth (ch. vii. 2 — 4). Even the reputation of doing good was not to be despised, and the fragrance of a good name was better than the odorous spikenard or rose-essence of the king's luxurious banquets (ch. vii. 1). And he gained, as men always do gain by any acts of kindness which are not altogether part of the ostentatious or self-calculating egotism of the Pharisee, something more than enjoyment. "Sunt lachrymae rerum, et nientem mortalia tangunt." "We needs must weep for woe, and, being men, Man's sorrows touch our hearts." ViRG. j£.n. I. 462. 1 Diog. Laert. x. 1. p. 6 INTRODUCTION. 49 The flood-gates of sympathy were opened. His self-love was expanding almost unconsciously into benevolence. He began to feel that altruism and not egotism was the true law of huma- nity. He was in this point, partly, perhaps, because here too the oracle in his inmost heart once more spoke out the secret of the wisdom of Israel, "Fear thou God," wiser than his teachers (ch. v. 7). A wealthy Jew with this turn for philosophizing was not likely to be overlooked by the lecturers and litterateurs of Alexandria. From the Library of that city Koheleth passed to the Museum 1 , and was elected, or appointed by royal favour, a member of the august body who dined in its large hall at the public expense, and held their philosophical discussions afterwards. It was a high honour for a foreigner, almost as much so as for an Eng- lishman to be elected to the Institute of France, or a French- man to a Fellowship of the Royal Society. He became first a listener and then a sharer in those discussions, an Eeclesiastes, a debater, and not a preacher, as we count preaching, in that Ecclesia. Epicureans and Stoics, Platonists and Aristotelians met as in a Metaphysical Society, and discussed the nature of hap- piness and of the supreme good, of the constitution of life and of the soul's immortality, of free will and destiny. The result of such a whirl of words and conflict of opinions was somewhat bewildering. He was almost driven back upon the formula of the scepticism of Pyrrho, "Who knows?" (ch. iii. 21). It was to him what a superficial study of Hobbes and Shaftesbury, of Voltaire and Rousseau, of Kant and Schelling, of Bentham and Mill, of Comte and Herbert Spencer, have been to English students of successive generations. One thing, at least, was clear. He saw that here also "the race was not to the swift, nor bread to the wise, nor riches to men of understanding" (ch. ix. 11). The charlatan too often took precedence of the true man; silent and thoughtful wisdom was out-talked by an eloquent 1 For the fullest account of the Alexandrian Museum accessible in English, see the article on Alexandria in Vol. LXVI. of the Quarterly Review. It is, I believe, no secret, that it was written by the late Rev. William Sewell. ECCLESIASTES 4 5s ("in sundry parts," or "times") agreeing with the nnXvp-epes ("manifold") of Wisd. vii. 22, and dnavyaa-fMa ("brightness") with Wisd. vii. 26. In Wisd. xviii. 22 the "Almighty Word" is represented as bring- ing "the unfeigned commandment as a sharp sword" and in Heb. iv. 12 that Word is described as "sharper than any two- edged sword." In Wisd. i. 6, "God is witness of his reins and a true beholder of his heart," and in Heb. iv. 12 the divine Word is "a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart." The following characteristic words are common to both : the "place of repentance" (Wisd. xii. 10; Heb. xii. 17), Moses as the servant (Oepdncov =" attendant") of God (Wisd. xvii. 21; Heb. iii. 5), Enoch translated, p-ereredr] (Wisd. iv. 10; Heb. xi. 5), 1 See Expositor, Vol. 11. Two papers on " the Writings of Apollos." 7o INTRODUCTION. vnoaraaLs ( = "substance" or "confidence" Wisd. xvi. 21 ; Heb. i. 3, iii. 14), rcXetoTTis ( = "perfection" Wisd. vi. 15; Heb. vi. 1), fteftaloHris ( = "confirmation" Wisd. vi. 18; Heb. vi. 6), anoXei- n€Tai ( = " there remaineth" Wisd. xiv. 6; Heb. iv. 6), 7rpbdpopos ( = "fore-runner" Wisd. xii. 8; Heb. vi. 20). The above instances are but a few out of a long list, but they are sufficient for our present purpose. It may be added that both books present numerous parallelisms with the writings of Philo 1 . It follows from the facts thus brought together, as well as from an examination of the book itself, that the Wisdom of Solomon was known to Hellenistic Jews early in the Apostolic age, that it probably had its origin in the Jewish School of Alexandria, or that its writer was acquainted with the works of the greatest of the teachers of that school. Looking to the work itself we find that he had at least some knowledge of the ethical teaching of Greek philosophers, and enumerates the four great virtues, of "'courage, temperance, justice, prudence" (di^dpeia, aocppoawq, biKaioawrj, cppovrjais), as they enumerated them (Wisd. viii. 7). With these data we may proceed to examine the relation in which he stands to the two books which have already been discussed in their relation to each other. The title of his book "Wisdom" indicates that he challenged comparison with the "Wisdom" of the son of Sirach. The form which he adopts for his teaching, his personation of the character of Solomon (Wisd. vii. 7 — 1 1, viii. 14, ix. 7, 8), shews that he did not shrink from challenging com- parison with Ecclesiastes. A closer scrutiny shews, if I mistake not, that a main purpose of his book was to correct either the teaching of that book, or a current misinterpretation of it. Let us remember in what light it must have presented itself to him. It had not, if our conclusion as to its authorship be right, the claim which comes from the reverence due to the authority of a remote antiquity or an unquestioned acceptance. He must have known that it had not been received as canonical without a serious opposition, that the strictest school of Pharisees had been against its reception, that it had seemed to them tainted with the heresy of Epicureanism and Sadduceeism. If it was 1 See the papers on " the Writings of Apollos " already referred to. INTRODUCTION. yi interpreted then as it has often been interpreted since, it may have seemed to him to sanction a lawless sensuality, to fall in with the thoughts of those who said "let us eat and drink, for to- morrow we die," to throw doubt, if not denial, on the soul's immortality. Was this, he seems to have asked himself, the true ideal of wisdom ? Was it not his duty to bring before men another Solomon than that whose experience seemed to end in materialism and pessimism, in the scepticism of an endless doubt? And so he too adopts, without any hesitation, the form of personated authorship. He has indeed less dramatic power than his predecessor. His Solomon is more remote from the Solomon of history than that of Koheleth. The magnificence, the luxury, the voluptuousness, which the earlier writer portrays so vividly, not less than the idolatry which is so prominent in the historical Solomon, are passed over here. The Son of David, as painted by him, is simply an ideal sage, a kind of Numa Pom- pilius, consecrating his life from beginning to end to the pursuit of wisdom, blameless and undefiled (Wisd. vii. viii.). Looked at from this point of view the opening of his book is in its very form sufficiently significant. He will not call himself an Eccle- siastes ox Debater. It seems to him that the work of a teacher is to teach and not merely to discuss. The wisdom which inspires him is authoritative and queen-like. He is, what Koheleth is not, a "preacher" in the modern sense of the word, and calls on men to listen with attention (Wisd. i. i). Had his predecessor counselled submission to the tyranny of kings, and accepted the perversion of judgment and justice as inevitable (Eccles. v. 8, x. 4, 20), he, for his part, will call on the judges of the earth and kings, and rebuke them for their oppressions (Wisd. i. 1, vi. 1 — 10). Had Koheleth spoken of seeking wisdom in w T ine and revelry, and the "delights" of the sons of men (Eccles. ii. 1 — 8}, he will proclaim that "wisdom will not dwell in the body that is subject unto sin" (Wisd. i. 4) and that "the true beginning of her is the desire of discipline" (Wisd. vii. 17). Had the earlier writer spoken bitter things of men and yet more of women (ch. vii. 28), he will remind his hearers that wisdom is a "loving," a "philan- thropic," spirit (cfii\a»0pa)77ov nvev[ia, Wisd. i. 6). To the ever- 72 INTRODUCTION. recurring complaint that all things are "vanity and feeding upon wind" (Eccles. i. 14, 17, ii. 26, et at.) he opposes the teaching that "murmuring is unprofitable" (Wisd. i. 11). The thought that death was better than life, to be desired as an everlasting sleep (Eccles. vi. 4, 5), he meets with the warning " seek not death in the error of your life" (Wisd. i. 12), ventures even on the assertion that "God made not death/' that it was an Enemy that had done this, that life and not death was contemplated in the Divine Purpose as the end of man (Wisd. i. 13). It was only the ungodly who counted death their friend (Wisd. i. 16). In the second chapter of the book, there is a still more marked antagonism. He puts into the mouth of the "ungodly" what appears in Ecclesiastes as coming from the writer himself. It is they who say "our life is short and miserable" (Wisd. ii. 6; Eccles. viii. 6), that "we shall be hereafter as though we had never been" (Wisd. ii. 2; Eccles. ix. 5, 6), that death and life are both determined by a random chance, "at all adventure" (Wisd. ii. 2; Eccles. ix. 11), that "our body shall be turned into ashes, and our spirit vanish in the soft air" (Wisd. ii. 3; Eccles. iii. 19, xii. 7) 1 , that after death the doom of oblivion soon overtakes man and all his actions (Wisd. ii. 4 ; Eccles. in). They take up almost the very words of Koheleth when they say "Let us enjoy the good things that are present. ..Let us fill ourselves with costly wine and ointments" (Wisd. ii.7 ; Eccles. ix. 7—9). Had the despond- ent pessimist mourned over the fact that the "wise man dieth as the fool," that there is one event to the righteous and the wicked" (Eccles. vii. 15, ix. 2), the answer is ready — that it was only "in the sight of the unwise they seemed to die," and that their hope is full of immortality (Wisd. iii. 2). Had he declared that he had not found one righteous woman after all his searching (Eccles. vii. 26), he is met with the half-personal answer that that was but natural, that it was true of all who despised wisdom and nurture that "their wives are foolish and their children wicked" (Wisd. iii. 12). Had he taught, or been thought to 1 I hold this to be a misinterpretation of the meaning of Eccles. xii. 7, but it was not the less a natural interpretation at the time, and has often been accepted since. INTRODUCTION. 73 teach, a life which was emancipated from all restraints and welcomed on almost equal terms children born in and out of wedlock (see Notes on Eccles. ix. 9, xi. 1, 2), entering as it were, a protest against the asceticism which afterwards developed itself into the rule of the more rigid Essenes, the voice of the writer of Wisdom declares that "blessed is the barren who is undefiled" and "the eunuch, which with his hands hath wrought no iniquity" (Wisd. iii. 14), that it is better "to have no children and to have virtue" (Wisd. iv. 1), that "the multiplying brood of th? ungodly shall not thrive." Had the sceptical thinker spoken in terms which suggested the thought that he looked on the hope of im- mortality and the enthusiasm of virtue as no less a form of in- sanity than the passionate vices of mankind (Eccles. i. 17, ii. 12, vii. 25^, the author of the Wisdom of Solomon puts into the mouth of the scoffers the confession "we fools counted his life madness" (Wisd. iv. 4). And the corrective antagonism of the later writer to the earlier is seen not less clearly in the fact that he gives prominence to what had been before omitted than in these direct protests. It seemed to him a strange defect that a book professing to teach wisdom should contain from first to last no devotional element, and therefore he puts into the mouth of his ideal Solo- mon a prayer of singular power and beauty for the gift of wisdom (Wisd. ix.). He, an Israelite, proud of the history of his fathers, could not understand a man writing almost as if he had ceased to be an Israelite, one to whom the names of Abraham and Isaac and Jacob were unknown, and therefore he enters on a survey of that history to shew that it had all along been a process mani- festing the law at once of a Divine retribution, and of a Divine education (Wisd. x. xi.). He could as little understand how a son of Abraham, writing in Egypt with all the monuments of its old idolatries and later developments of the same tendency to anthropomorphic and theriomorphic worship around him, could have let slip the opportunity of declaring that God is a spirit (Wisd. xii. 1) and must be worshipped in spirit and in truth ; that the worship of "fire or wind, or the swift air or the circle oi the stars, or the violent water or the lights of heaven" (Wisd. 74 INTRODUCTION. xiii. i — 4) was relatively noble, "less to be blamed" as com- pared with the gross idolatry which stirred his spirit within him — as that of Athens stirred the spirit of St Paul — as he walked through the streets of Alexandria. The one idea of God pre- sented in Ecclesiastes seemed to him to be that of Power, hardly of Law, predestinating times and seasons 'Eccles. iii. 1 — 10) and the chances and changes of men's lives (Eccles. ix. 1 1), work- ing out a partial retribution for man's misdeeds within the limits of earthly experience (Eccles. xi. 9, xii. 14), but leaving many wrongs and anomalies unredressed (Eccles. v. 8, viii. 11). He seeks therefore to bring before men that thought of the Father- hood of God, which was beginning to dawn upon men's minds, some echoes of which (if our conclusion as to the date of the book be right) had perhaps floated to him from the lips that proclaimed that Fatherhood in its fulness. He had heard, it may be, that One had appeared in Galilee and Jerusalem who "professed to have the knowledge of God, and called himself the 'child' or 'servant' (jralda) of the Lord and made his boast that God was his Father" (Wisd. ii. 13 — 16), that He had been slandered, conspired against, mocked, and put to death, that Sadducean priests had stood by his cross deriding Him, "if the righteous man be the son of God, He will help him and deliver him from the hands of his enemies. Let us examine him with despitefulness and torture and condemn him with a shameful death" (Wisd. ii. 18 — 20) and that marvellous history had stirred him into a glow of admiration for Him whom as yet he knew not. He could not subside after that into the tone of mind which looks on "life as a pastime and our time here as a market for gain" (Wisd. xv. 12). It will be seen in the Commentary that follows that I look on the estimate which the author of the Wisdom of Solomon formed of Ecclesiastes as a wrong one, that he was wanting in the insight that sees the real drift which is the resultant of cross currents and conflicting lines of thought. The mystical ascetic who had been trained in the school of Philo, who was, it may be, to develope afterwards, under a higher teaching, into the writer of the Epistle to the Hebrews, lived and moved in a INTRODUCTION. 75 region of thought and feeling altogether different from that of the man who had passed through a multiform experience of wine and wisdom, of love and madness, of passion and "feeding upon wind." But it is not the less instructive to note how such a writer treated the earlier book which also professed to embody the Wisdom of Solomon, of which he could not possibly have been ignorant, and which seemed to him to tend to the popular easy-going Epicureanism that was destructive of all lofty aims and nobleness of character. CHAPTER VI. JEWISH INTERPRETERS OF ECCLESIASTES. It is, perhaps, natural in dealing with a book which presents so many difficulties both in particular passages and in its general drift, to turn to the interpreters who belonged to the same race and spoke the same language as the writer. How did they understand this or that expression? What did they gather from the book as its chief substantial lesson? And of these we look naturally, in the first instance, with most interest and expectation to the book which gives us the expression, not of an individual opinion, but of the collective wisdom of Israel. We have heard, it may be, high things of the beauty of the Haggadistic mode of interpretation that prevailed in the schools out of which the Mishna, the Gemara, the Targum, and the Midrashim sprang 1 . We open the Midrash, or Commentary, 1 The terms may be briefly explained for the reader to whom they are wholly or comparatively new. The Targums ( = Interpretation) are the Chaldee or Aramaic Paraphrases of the Books of the Old Testa- ment. The Mishna (= repetition or study) is a collection of Treatises on various points, chiefly ceremonial or juristic, in the Mosaic Law. The Gemara ( = completeness) is a commentary on, or development of, the Mishna, the contents of which have been classified as coming under two categories, (1) the Halachah ( = Rule), which includes the enact- ments of the Mishna in their application to life, and answers ac- cord in»ly to the casuistic systems of Scholastic Theology, and (2) the Haggadah ( = Legend, or Saga) which comprises a wide range of legend- ary, allegorical, and mystical interpretation. The Midrashim ( = studies, 76 INTRODUCTION. on Koheleth in the hope that we shall see our way through passages that have before been dark, that some light will be thrown on the meaning of words and phrases that have perplexed us. What we actually find answers to the parable of the blind leading the blind and both falling into the ditch (Matt. xv. 14) ; rules of interpretation by which anything can be made to mean anything else; legends of inconceivable extravagance passing the utmost limits of credibility ; an absolute incapacity for getting at the true meaning of a single paragraph or sentence, — this makes up the store of accumulated wisdom to which we had fondly looked forward. Instead of a "treasure" of "things new and old," the pearls and gems, the silver and the gold, of the wisdom of the past, we find ourselves in an old clothes' shop full of shreds and patches, of rags and tatters. We seem, as we read, to be listening to "old wives' fables" and old men's dreams. A suspicion floats across our mind that the interpreta- tions are delirantium somnia in the most literal sense of the word. We involuntarily ask, Can these men have been in their right minds? Are we not listening to a debate of insane Com- mentators? Is not the Midrash as a Critici Sacri compiled and edited within the walls of Colney Hatch? Of other expositions it is true that they "to some faint meaning make pretence." Of this alone, or almost alone, it may be said that it "never deviates into sense." Would the reader like to judge for himself and try his luck at Sortes Midrashiance? I take a few samples at a venture. (1) Eccles. i. 7, "All the rivers run into the sea, yet the sea is not full." Of this verse we have a wide variety of interpreta- tions : {a) All wisdom is in the heart of man and the heart is not full, {b) The whole law goes into the heart and the heart is not satisfied, (c) All people will join themselves to Israel and yet the number of Israel will still grow, (d) All the dead pass into Hades and Hades is not lull, (e) All Israelites go on their or expositions) are commentaries, collecting the opinions of distin- guished Rabbis on the Books of the Old Testament, and these also contain the Halachah and Haggadah as their chief elements. Deutsch. Essays, pp. 17 — 20, 41 — 51. INTRODUCTION. 77 yearly pilgrimage to Jerusalem and yet the Temple is never crowded. (/) All riches flow into the kingdom of Edom ( = Rome), but in the days of the Messiah they shall be brought back. (2) Eccles. iv. 8, "There is one alone, and there is not a second; yea, he has neither child nor brother." (a) He who is alone is God, the ever-blessed One. (b) Or he is Abraham, who had no son or brother or wife when he was thrown into Nimrod's furnace, when he was told to leave his father's house, and when he was commanded to offer up his only son Isaac ; or (c) He who is alone, is the tribe of Levi, who found "no end of all his labour" in erecting the Tabernacle; or {d) that which is alone is the evil lust which leads a man to sin and breaks the ties of kindred; or (e) the words describe Gebini ben Charson who was his mother's only son and was blind and could not see his wealth and had no end of trouble with it. (3) Eccles. ix. 14—16. "There was a little city and few men within it, and there came a great king and besieged it, and built great bulwarks against it. Now there was found in it a poor wise man, and he by his wisdom delivered the city." Here again the expositions are manifold, (a) The city is the world, and the few men are those that lived at the time of the Flood and the king is Jehovah, and the wise man is Noah. (J?) The city is Egypt and the king is Pharaoh, and the poor wise man is Joseph, (c) The city is Egypt and the few men are Joseph's brethren and the king is Joseph, and the wise man is Judah. {d) The city is Egypt and the men are the Israelites, and the king is the Pharaoh of the Exodus, and the wise man is Moses. (e) The city is Sinai, the men are the Israelites and the king is the King of kings, and the bulwarks are the 613 precepts of the Law, and the wise man is Moses. {/) The city is Sinai and the few men are the Israelites, and the king is the lust of the flesh, and the wise man is Moses, (g) The little city is the Synagogue, and the men are the assembly in it, and the king is the King of kings and the wise man is the elder of the Synagogue, (k) The city is the human body, and the men are its limbs, and the king is the lust of the flesh, and the 78 INTRODUCTION. bulwarks are temptations and errors, and the wise man is Conscience. A few more specimens will be enough to complete the induc- tion: The "dead flies" of Eccles. x. i are (a) Korah and his company; or (b) Doeg and Ahithophel. The precept, "give a portion to seven and also to eight " of Eccles. xi. 3, is explained as referring (a) to the Laws of the Sabbath on the seventh day of the week and of Circumcision on the eighth day after birth; or (b) to Moses as in the seventh generation from Abraham and Joshua as representing the eighth; or (c) to the ceremonial pre- cept of Lev. xii. 1 — 3 ; or {d) to the seven days of the Feast of Tabernacles and the closing festival of the eighth day. The maxim, "in the morning sow thy seed and in the evening with- hold not thine hand" of Eccles. xi. 6, means Marry in thy youth and beget children, and if thy wife dies, marry again in thine age and beget more children. "Rejoice, O young man, in thy youth..." means "Rejoice in the study of the Law and let thy heart cheer thee with the doctrine of the Mishna and walk in the ways of thy heart, i.e. of the higher knowledge of the Talmud." The " evil days " of Eccles. xii. 1 are the days of the Messiah and of the great tribulation that accompanies them. The "mourners that go about the streets" are the worms that feed upon the carcase (Eccles. xii. 5). The "clouds that return after the rain" are the stern prophecies of Jeremiah that came after the destruction of the Temple. The "pitcher broken at the fountain" (Eccles. xii. 6) is the potter's vessel of Jer. xxxvi. 18. The "grasshopper" of Eccles. xii. 6 is the golden image of Nebuchadnezzar. The student will probably think that he has had enough and more than enough of the insanities of the Midi-ash Koheleth. If the Midrash fail us, shall we fare better with the Targum, or Paraphrase, of Ecclesiastes? Here at any rate we are not involved in a labyrinth of conflicting interpretations each more monstrous than the other. The mass of opinions has been sifted, and the judicious editor, compiling, as it were, a Commentary for use in families and schools, has selected that which seems to him most in accordance with the meaning of the original, INTRODUCTION. 79 explaining its hard passages so as to make them easy and edifying for the unlearned reader. Let us see what he will find in this instance and how the edification is obtained. Text. Eccles. i. 3. What profit hath a man of all his labour which he taketh under the sun? Eccles. i. 11. Neither shall there be any remembrance of things that are to come with those that shall come after. Eccles. i. 17. I the Preacher was king over Israel in Jerusalem. Targum. What advantage is there to a man after his death, from all his labour which he laboured under the sun in this world, except he studied the word of God, in order to receive a good reward in the world to come? There will be no remembrance of them among the generations which will be in the days of the King Messiah. When king Solomon was sitting upon the throne of his kingdom, his heart became very proud of his riches, and he transgressed the word of God, and he gathered many horses, and chariots, and riders, and he amassed much gold, and silver, and he married from foreign nations ; whereupon the anger of the Lord was kindled against him, and he sent to him Ashmodai the king of the demons, who drove him from the throne of his kingdom, and took away the ring from his hand, in order that he should wander about the world to reprove it, and he went about in the provincial towns and cities of the land of Israel, weep- ing and lamenting, and saying, I am Koheleth whose name was formerly called Solomon, who was king over Israel in Jerusalem. 8o INTRODUCTION. Text. Eccles. ii. 4. I made nie great works : I builded me houses ; I planted me vineyards. Eccles. ii. 10. My remained with me. •isdc Eccles. ii. 18. Because I should leave it unto the man that shall be after me. Eccles. hi. 1. A time to be born, and a time to die. Eccles. iii. ir. He hath made everything beautiful in his time. Targum. I multiplied good works in Je- rusalem. I built houses, the Tem- ple, to make atonement for Israel, and a royal palace, and a conclave, and the porch, and a house of judgment of hewn stones where the wise men sit, and the judges to give judgment. I made a throne of ivory for the sitting of royalty. I planted vineyards in Jabne, that I and the Rabbis of the Sanhed- rin might drink wine, and also to make libations of wine new and old upon the altar. Whatsoever the Rabbis of the Sanhedrin asked of me respecting pure and impure, innocent and guilty, I did not withhold from them any explanation of these things. Because I must leave it to Re- hoboam my son who comes after me, and Jeroboam his servant will come and take away out of his hands ten tribes, and will possess half of the kingdom. There is a special time for be- getting sons and daughters, and a special time for killing disobe- dient and perverse children, to kill them with stones according to the decree of the judges. King Solomon said by the spirit of prophecy, God made everything beautiful in its time; for it was opportune that there should be the strife which was in the days of Jero- boam son of Nebat : for if it had INTRODUCTION. Text. Eccles. iii. 19. That which be- falleth the sons of men befalleth beasts. Eccles. iv. 13. Better is a poor and wise child than an old and foolish kin?. Eccles. v. 7. In the multitude of dreams and many words there are also divers vanities : but fear thou God. Targum. been in the days of Sheba, son of Bichri, the Temple would not have been built because of the golden calves which the wicked Jeroboam made... He concealed from them also the great Name written and expressed on the foundation stone. For as to the destiny of the wicked and the destiny of the unclean beast, it is one destiny for both of them. Better Abraham, who is the poor youth and in whom is the spirit of prophecy from the Lord, and to whom the Lord was known when three years old, and who would not worship an idol, than the wicked Nimrod who w T as an old and foolish king. And be- cause Abraham would not wor- ship an idol he threw him into the burning furnace, and a miracle was performed for him of the Lord of the world, and He de- livered him from it... For Abra- ham went out from the family of idolaters, and reigned over the land of Canaan; for even in the reign of Abraham Nimrod became poor in the world.... [Then follows a long prediction like that in the paraphrase of chap. iii. n of the revolt of the ten tribes under Jeroboam.] In the multitude of the dreams of the false prophets, and in the vanities of sorcerers, and in the many words of the wicked, be- ECCLESIASTES S2 INTRODUCTION. Text. Eccles. v. 6. Neither say thou before the angel that it was an error. Eccles. vi. 6. Do not all go to one place? Eccles. vi. 8. What hath the poor, that knoweth to walk before the living ? Eccles. vii. 4. The heart of the wise is in the house of mourning. Eccles. vii. 15. All things have I seen in the days of my vanity. Eccles. vii. 16. Be not righteous over much. Eccles. vii. 24. That which is far off, and exceeding deep, who can find it out ? Eccles. vii. 28. One man a- mong a thousand have I found; Targum. lieve not, but serve the wise and just. In the day of the great judg- ment thou wilt not be able to say before the avenging angel who exercises dominion over thee, that it is an error. If he... had not studied the law ...in the day of his death he will go to Gehenna, to the place whither all sinners go. What is this poor man to do but to study the law of the Lord, that he may know how he will have to walk in the presence of the righteous in Paradise ? The heart of the wise mourns over the destruction of the Temple, and grieves over the captivity of the house of Israel. All this I saw in the days of my vanity, that from the Lord are decreed good and evil to be in the world according to the planets under which men are created. Be not over-righteous when the wicked is found guilty of death in the court of judgment: so as to have compassion on him, and not to kill him. Who is he that will find out by his wisdom the secret of the day of death, and the secret of the day when the King Messiah will come? From the days of the first Adam till the righteous Abraham was INTRODUCTION. 83 Text. but a woman among all those have I not found. Eccles. viii. 14. There be just men to whom it happeneth ac- cording to the work of the wicked ; again, there be wicked men to whom it happeneth according to the work of the righteous. Eccles. ix. 2. All things come alike to all. Eccles. ix. 8. Let thy gar- ments be always white; and let thy head lack no ointment. Eccles. ix. 14. There was a little city, and few men within it... Targum. born, who was found faithful and just among the thousand kings that gathered together to build the tower of Babel ? and a woman, as Sarah, among all the wives of those kings I have not found. There are righteous to whom evil happens as if they had done like the deeds of the wicked ; and there are wicked to whom it hap- pens as if they had done like the deeds of the righteous ; and I saw by the Holy Spirit that the evil which happens to the righteous in this world is not for their guilt, but to free them from a slight transgression, that their reward may be perfect in the world to come ; and the good that comes to sinners in this world is not for their merits, but to render them a reward for the small merit they have acquired, so that they may get their reward in this world, and to destroy their portion in the world to come. Everything depends upon the planets ; whatever happens to any one is fixed in heaven. At all times let thy garment be white from all pollution of sin, and acquire a good name, which is likened to anointing oil. Also this I saw... the body of a man which is like a small city. . . and in it are a few mighty men just as the merits in the heart of man are few ; and the evil spirit 6—2 8 4 INTRODUCTION. Text. Eccles. I have seen ser- vants upon horses, and princes walking as servants. Eccles. xi. 9. Whoso removeth stones shall be hurt therewith; and he that cleaveth wood shall be endangered thereby. Eccles. x. 16, 17. "Woe to thee, Targum. who is like a great and powerful king, enters into the body to se- duce it... to catch him in the great snares of Gehenna, in order to burn him seven times for his sin. And there is found in the body a good spirit, humble and wise, and he prevails over him and sub- dues him by his wisdom, and saves the body from the judgment of Gehenna. King Solomon said by the spirit of prophecy, I saw nations who were before subject to the people of the house of Israel, now pros- perous and riding on horses like princes, whilst the people of the house of Israel and their princes walk on the ground like slaves. King Solomon the prophet said, It is revealed to me that Ma- nasseh, the son of Hezekiah, will sin and worship idols of stone; wherefore he will be delivered into the hands of the king of Assyria, and he will fasten him with halters : because he made void the words of the law which are written on the tables of stone from the be- ginning, therefore he will suffer from it; and Rabshakeh his brother will worship an image of wood, and forsake the words of the law which are laid in the ark of shittim-wood ; therefore he shall be burned in a fire by the angel of the Lord. Woe to thee, O land of Israel, INTRODUCTION. 85 Text. O land, when thy king is a child, and thy princes eat in the morning. Blessed art thou, O land, when thy king is the son of nobles, and thy princes eat in due season. Eccles. x. 20. Curse not the king, no not in thy thought ; and curse not the rich in thy bed- chamber; for a bird of the air shall carry the voice, and that which hath wings shall tell the matter. Eccles. xii. 5. The mourners go about the streets. Eccles. xii. 11. The words of the wise are as goads, and as nails fastened by the masters of assem- blies, which are given from one shepherd. Takgum. when wicked Jeroboam shall reign over thee, and remove from thee the morning sacrifices, and thy princes shall eat bread before offering the daily morning sacri- fice. Well to thee, O land of Israel, when Hezekiah son of Ahaz, from the family of the house of David, king of Israel, who is mighty in the land, shall reign over thee, and shall perform the obligations of the commandments, and thy nobles, after having brought thee the daily sacrifice, shall eat bread at the fourth hour. Even in thy mind, in the inner- most recesses of thy heart, curse not the king, and in thy bed- chamber revile not a wise man, for the angel Raziel proclaims every day from heaven upon Mount Horeb, and the sound thereof goes into all the world; and Elijah the high-priest hovers in the air like an angel, the king of the winged tribe, and discloses the things that are done in secret to all the in- habitants of the earth. The angels that seek thy judg- ment walk about like mourners, walking about the streets, to write the account of thy judgments. The words of the wise are like goads that prick, and forks which incite those who are destitute of knowledge to learn wisdom as the goad teaches the ox; and so are the words of the rabbis of the 86 INTRODUCTION. Text. Targum. Sanhedrin, the masters of the Halachas and Midrashim which were given through Moses the prophet ; who alone fed the people of the house of Israel in the wil- derness with manna and delicacies. Eccles. xii. \i. And further, And more than these, my son, by these, my son, be admonished ; take care to make many books of of making many books there is wisdom without an end, to study no end, and much study is a much the words of the law and to weariness of the flesh. consider the weariness of the flesh. It will be felt from the extracts thus brought together 1 that the Targum is on the whole pleasanter reading than the Midrash. The traces of discordant interpretation are carefully effaced. All flows on smoothly as if there never had been and never could be any doubt as to what the writer of the original book had meant. Hard sayings are made easy. A spiritual, or at least an ethical, turn is given to words which seemed at first to suggest quite other than spiritual conclusions. The writer of the book, whose identity with Solomon is not questioned for a moment, is made to appear not only as a moral teacher but in the higher character of a prophet. The illustrations drawn from the history of Israel, the introduction of the name of Jehovah, the constant reference to the Shechinah and the Law, give the paraphrase a national and historical character not possessed by the original. The influence of the planets as determining men's characters and the events that fashion them is brought in as a theory of predestination easier to receive than that which ascribes all that happens to the direct and immediate action of the Divine Will. All is done, in one sense, to edification. The misfortune is, however, that the edification is purchased at the cost of making the writer say just the opposite, in many cases, of what he actually did say. As Koheleth personates 1 I have to acknowledge my obligations for these extracts to the translation of the Targum appended to Dr Ginsburg's Koheleth. INTRODUCTION. 87 Solomon, so the paraphrast personates Koheleth, and the con- fessions of the Debater, with their strange oscillations and con- trasts, become a fairly continuous homily. In all such interpre- tations, and the Targum of Koheleth is but a sample of a wide- spread class which includes other than Jewish, commentators, there is at once an inherent absence of truthfulness and a want of reverence. The man will not face facts, but seeks to hide them or gloss them over. He assumes that he is wiser than the writer whom he interprets, practically, i.e. he claims for himself a higher inspiration. He prefers the traditions of the school in which he has been brought up to the freshness of the Divine word as it welled forth out of the experience of a human heart. With the eleventh century we enter on a fresh line of Jewish interpreters of the book. The old rabbinical succession had more or less died out, and the Jewish school of Europe began to be conspicuous for a closer and more grammatical exegesis of the sacred text. An interesting survey of the literature which thus grew up, so far as it bears on the interpretation of Eccle- siastes, will be found in the Introduction to Dr Ginsburg's Com- mentary. It is marked, as might be expected, by more thorough- ness and more individual study, a truer endeavour to get at the real meaning of the book. Each man takes his place in the great army of Commentators and works on his own responsi- bility. To go through their labour would be an almost intermin- able task. It was worth while to give some account of the Midrash and the Targum because they represented certain dominant methods and lines of thought, but it does not fall within the scope of this volume to examine the works of all Jewish interpreters simply because they are Jewish, any more than of those that are Christian. INTRODUCTION CHAPTER VII. ECCLESIASTES AND ITS PATRISTIC INTERPRETERS. It does not fall, as has been just said, within the plan of the present book, to give a review of the Commentaries on Ecclesi- astes that have preceded it, so far as they represent only the opinions of individual writers. The case is, however, as before, altered when they represent a school of thought or a stage in the history of interpretation, and where accordingly the outcome of their labours illustrates more or less completely the worth of the method they adopted, the authority which may rightly be given to the dicta of the School. It has been said (Ginsburg, p. 99), that Ecclesiastes is nowhere quoted in the New Testament, and as far as direct, formal quotations are concerned the assertion is strictly true. It was not strange that it should thus be passed over. The controversy already referred to (Ch. III.) between the schools of Hillel and Shammai as to its reception into the Canon, the doubts that hung over the drift of its teaching, would naturally throw it into the background of the studies of devout Israelites. It would not be taught in schools. It was not read in Synagogues. It was out of harmony with the glowing hopes of those who were looking for the Christ or were satisfied that they had found Him. Traces of its not being altogether unknown to the writers of the New Testament may, however, be found. When St Paul teaches why "the creation was made subject to vanity" (Rom. viii. 20), using the same Greek word as that employed by the LXX. translators, we may recognise a reference to the dominant burden of the book. When St James writes "What is your life? It is even a vapour, that appeareth for a little time, and then vanisheth away" (James iv. 14) we may hear something like an echo of Eccles. vi. 12. The earlier Christian writers followed in the same track and the only trace of the book in the Apostolic Fathers is the quota- tion of Eccles. xii. 13 ("Fear God and keep His command- INTRODUCTION. 89 merits") in the Shepherd o& Hermas {Maud. vn.). Justin quotes the Wisdom of Solomon but not Ecclesiastes. Irenaeus neither names nor quotes it. Clement of Alexandria, who makes no less than twenty-six quotations from the Wisdom of Solomon, quotes in one solitary passage {Strom. 1. 1 31 from Eccles. i. 16 — 18, vii. 13. In Origen, though the quotations from Wisdom are still far more numerous, we have more traces of a thoughtful study. The vanitas vanitatum is connected with Rom. viii. 20 as above (de Princ. I. 7, c. Cels. I. 7). He supposes Eccles. i. 6 to have given occasion to the contemptuous language in which Celsus had spoken of Christians as talking of "circles upon circles" (c. Cels. VI. 34, 35}. In Eccles. i. 9 he finds a confirmation of his belief that there have been worlds before the present world and that there will be others after it {de Princ. III. 5, c. Cels. IV. 12). The "Spirit of the ruler" (Eccles. x. 4) is interpreted of the evil Spirit (de Princ. III. 2). In the words "the earth abideth for ever" (Eccles. i. 4) he finds an instance of the use of the word "eternity" with a secondary and limited connotation {Co mm. in Rom. B. VI.). He gives a mystical interpretation of Eccles. iv. 2 as meaning that those who are crucified with Christ are better than those that are living to the flesh; of the "untimely birth" of Eccles. vi. 3 as meaning Christ whose human nature never developed, as that of other men develops, into sin {Horn. vn. in Num.), and cites Eccles vii. 20, with Rom. xi. 33 as a confession that the ways of God are past finding out {de Princ. IV. 2). The passages now cited are enough to shew that it was pro- bable that those who had studied in the school of Origen would not entirely neglect a book to which he had thus directed their attention. His treatment of them indicates that they were likely to seek an escape from its real or seeming difficulties in an alle- gorizing, or, to use the Jewish phrase, a Haggadistic interpre- tation. And this accordingly is what we find. The earliest systematic treatment of Ecclesiastes is found in the Metaphrasis or Paraphrase of Gregory Thaumaturgus, who had studied under the great Alexandrian teacher. Of all patristic commentaries it is the simplest and most natural. From first to last there 90 INTRODUCTION. is no strained allegorism or mysticism, finding in the text quite another meaning than that which was in the mind of the writer. The scepticism of Eccles. iii. 20, 21 is freely rendered, "The other kind of creatures have all the same breath of life and men have nothing more... For it is uncertain regarding the souls of men, whether they shall fly upwards ; and regarding the others which the unreasoning creatures possess whether they shall fall downwards." The Epicurean counsel of Eccles. ix. 7 — 9 is stated without reserve, but is represented as the error of "men of vanity," which the writer rejects. The final close of the writer's thought (Eccles. xii. 7) is given without exaggeration, "For men who be on the earth there is but one salvation, that their souls acknowledge and wing their way to Him by whom they have been made." Perhaps the most remarkable passage of the Commentary is the way in which the paraphrase of Eccles. xii. 1 — 6 represents the original as depicting the ap- proach of a great storm filling men with terror, anticipating in this the interpretation which Dr Ginsburg and Mr Cox have worked out with an elaborate fulness : "Moreover it is right that thou shouldest fear God, while thou art yet young, before thou givest thyself over to evil things, and before the great and terrible day of God cometh, when the sun shall no longer shine, neither the moon, nor the other stars, but when in that storm and commotion of all things, the powers above shall be moved, that is, the angels who guard the world; so that the mighty men shall cease, and the women shall cease their labours, and shall flee into the dark places of their dwell- ings, and shall have all the doors shut ; and a woman shall be restrained from grinding by fear, and shall speak with the weakest voice, like the tiniest bird ; and all impure women shall sink into the earth, and cities and their blood-stained govern- ments shall wait for the vengeance that comes from above, while the most bitter and bloody of all times hangs over them like a blossoming almond, and continuous punishments impend over them like a multitude of flying locusts and the transgressors are cast out of the way like a black and despicable caper plant. And the good man shall depart with rejoicing to his own ever- INTRODUCTION. 91 lasting habitation; but the vile shall fill all their places with wailing, and neither silver laid up in store, nor tried gold, shall be of use any more. For a mighty stroke shall fall upon all things, even to the pitcher that standeth by the well, and the wheel of the vessel which may chance to have been left in the hollow, when the course of time comes to an end and the ablu- tion-bearing period of a life that is like water has passed away 1 ." A more ambitious but less complete treatment of Ecclesiastes is found in eight homilies by Gregory of Nyssa, which cover however only the first three chapters. Like his other writings it breathes the spirit of a devout thinker trained in the school of Origen, alike in his allegorizing method of interpretation and in his utterance of the wider hope. At eveiy step he diverges from the true work of the interpreter to some edifying and spiritual reflection. The Greek title of the book suggests its connexion with the work and life of the Ecclesia of Christ. Christ himself was the true Ecclesiastes gathering together those that had been scattered into the unity of His fulness. The true son of David was none other than the in- carnate Word. In the language of Eccles. i. II, "neither shall there be any remembrance of things that are to come," Gregory finds an indication of his deeply-cherished conviction that the final restitution of all things will work out an entire oblitera- tion even of the memory of evil {Horn. I.). The words "that which is lost cannot be numbered" seem to him connected with the fall of Judas as the son of perdition, with the wander- ing sheep who reduces the complete hundred to the incomplete- ness of the ninety and nine {Horn. II.). The description of the magnificence of Solomon in Eccles. ii. 1 — 8 leads to a whole train of half-mystical reflections. The true palace is that of Wisdom and its pillars are the virtues that sustain the soul. What need is there of gardens for one who was in the true Paradise of contemplation? {Horn. III.). Is not the true fountain 1 The original is obscure and probably corrupt. The meaning of the commentator may be that the period of life in which a man may receive the ' ' washing of regeneration " will in that day come to a sudden end. 92 INTRODUCTION. the teaching that leads to virtue? The mention of servants and handmaids leads him to protest against the evil of slavery (Bom. IV.). In the counsel to eat and drink he finds a reference not to the bread which nourishes the body but to the food which sustains the soul (Horn. v.). The catalogue of Times and Seasons in Eccles. iii. i — 8 suggests, as might be expected, a copious variety of like reflections. He cannot speak of the "time to plant" without thinking of the field of which the Father is the husbandman, of "the time to pluck up" without dwelling on the duty of rooting out the evil tares of sin (Horn. VI.). The "time to kill" can refer only to the vices which we are called on to strangle and destroy. The "time to weep" recalls to his mind the beatitudes of the Sermon on the Mount (Matt. v. 4) and the parable of the children sitting in the market-place (Matt. xi. 16, 17) (Horn. VII.). So "the time to gather stones" is applied to the stones of temperance and fortitude by which we destroy vice. The "time to keep silence" reminds him of St Paul's rule bidding women be silent in the Church, and the "time for war" of the Christian warfare and the whole armour of God (Horn. VIII.). Beyond this point he does not go, and perhaps it is well that he stopped where he did. Interesting and even edifying as such homiletic treatment may be as the expression of a refined and devout and noble character, it is obvious that it hardly contributes one jot or tittle to the right understanding of the book which it professes to expound. With the exception of the hints given by Gregory Thaumaturgus, the Greek Fathers of the Church have contributed almost as little to the exegesis of Ecclesiastes as the Rabbis of the Midrash Koheleth. The history of the interpretation of Ecclesiastes among the Latin Fathers runs more or less on parallel lines with that which has just been traced. The earlier writers knew the book, and this or that proverbial sentence dwells in their memories, but they have not studied it and do not venture on any systematic interpretation. Thus Tertullian simply quotes three times the maxim of Eccles. iii. 1, that "there is a time for all things" {adv. Marc. V. 4, de Monog. III., de Virg. Vel. III.)- Cyprian cites Eccles. i. 14, v. 4, 10, vii. 17, x. 9 in his Testimonia adversus INTRODUCTION. 93 Judceos (c. 11, 30, 61, 53, 86) but with no indication that the book as a whole had been thought over, and no trace of any mystical interpretation. When we come to Augustine the case is widely different. The allegorizing method which had been fostered by Origen had taken root, and the facility with which it ministered to spiritual meditation and turned what had been stumblingblocks into sources of edification, commended it to devout interpreters. He does not write a Commentary on the book, but he quotes it in a way which shews that it was often in his hands and is always ready with an interpretation that brings an edifying thought out of the least promising materials. Thus he fastens on the "vanitas vanitantium? of the old Latin Ver- sion as shewing that it is only for the "va7iitantes" the men who are without God, that the world is vanity (de Ver. Relig. c. 41). The "portion to seven and also to eight" of Eccles. xi. 2 is for him " ad ' duorum Testamentormn significatio7iem? the one rest- ing on the sabbath, the other "on the eighth day, which is also the first, the day of the Lord's Resurrection" (ad Inqu. Jan. c. 23). In the words that "the Spirit returns to God who gave it" (Eccles. xii. 7) he finds a proof that each single soul is created by an individual divine act and not engendered as was the bodily frame in which it dwelt. He connects Rom. viii. 20 ("the creature was made subject to vanity") with the main thesis of the book, as shewing that the sentence "vanity of vanities" is temporary and remedial in its nature and will one day be removed (Expos. Epist. Rom. c. 53), and dwells on the fact that it applies only to the things that are "under the sun," to the visible things which are temporal, and not to the invisible which are eternal (Euarr. in Ps. xxxviii.). His controversy with Pela- gianism leads him to recognise in the "righteous overmuch" of Eccles. vii. 16 the character of the man who wraps himself up in the garments of his own "righteousness of works" (Tract, in Jo inn. XCV.). He contrasts the "one generation goeth and another generation cometh" with the permanence of the eternal Word (Enarr. in Ps. ci.). The maxim that "he that increaseth knowledge increaseth sorrow" (Eccles. i. 18) is for him true even of the wisdom of charity, seeing that we cannot love men with- 94 INTRODUCTION. out a fresh pang- of sorrow for their sufferings and their sins {Enarr. in Ps. xcviii.). On the "many inventions" of Eccles. vii. 30 he characteristically preaches " Mane apud unum, Noli ire in multa, Ibi beatitudo" (Serm. XCVI.). In his later treatment of the book the allegorical method is more fully developed and the "eating and drinking," the "bread and wine" of Eccles. viii. 15, ix. 7 are interpreted as pointing not even to the most inno- cent forms of sensuous enjoyment, but to that which is repre- sented by the symbols of the Eucharistic feast (de Civ. Dei, xvii. 20). The "dead flies" that mar the fragrant "ointment of the apothecary" (Eccles. x. 1) are the post-baptismal sins which taint the good fame of professing Christians ic. Epist. Parmen). The Haggadistic style of interpretation' culminates in his explanation of Eccles. x. 16, 17. He finds there the u du a\Xa 5^ 0' v\t] Trjkedowaa eTcu uipr)' us av5pwi> yeveT) y p,hv (pvei, if 5' dToXrjyei. "As are the leaves, so is the race of men; Some the wind scatters on the ground, and some The fruitful forest, when the springtide comes, Puts forth ; so note we also with mankind ; One comes to life, another falls away." It is significant that these lines were ever in the mouth of Pyrrho, the founder of the Greek school of Sceptics (Diog. Laert. ix. 11. 6). 5. The sun also ariseth'] From the standpoint of modern thought the sun might seem even more than the earth to be the type of perma- nent existence, but with the Hebrew, who looked on it in its phe- nomenal aspect, it was not so, and the sun accordingly appears as presenting not a contrast, but a parallel, to human mutability and resultless labour. We are reminded of the Rabbinic legend of Abra- ham's looking on the sun, and, when half tempted to adore it, repressing the temptation by watching its going down and saying "The God whom I worship must be a God that does not set." Koran, Sur. 6. Stanley's Jewish Church, I. Lect. I. hasteth to his place where he arose] The primary meaning of the first of the two verbs is that of the panting of one who travels quickly. Here again we have to think of the belief that, between the sunset and the sunrise, the sun had a long journey to perform, as the Greeks thought, by the great Ocean river, till it returned to the point where it had risen the day before. Possibly the clouds and mists of the morning were thought of as the panting of the sun, as of " the strong man " who " runs his race" (Ps. xix. 5). Parallels present themselves in Ps. xix. 5 ("rejoiceth as a strong man to run a race") and yet more strikingly in Virgil, Georg. 1. 250, Nosque ubi primus equis Oriens adflavit anhelis, Illic sera rubens accendit lumina Vesper. "And when to us the sun with panting steeds Hastens at dawn, far off the star of eve There lights her glowing lamp." Comp. also sEn. xn. 113. 106 ECCLESIASTES, I. [vv. 6, 7. 6 where he arose. The wind goeth toward the south, and turneth about unto the north; it whirleth about continually, 7 and the wind returneth again according to his circuits. All the rivers run into the sea; yet the sea is not full; unto the place from whence the rivers come, thither they return 6. The wind goeth toward the south'] This comes after the sun as exhibit- ing a like, though more irregular, law of mutability. ' ' South and north n only are named, partly, perhaps, because east and west were implied in the sunrise and sunset of the previous verse, more probably because these were the prevailing currents of air in Palestine. Comp. "Awake, O north wind; blow, O south," in Song of Sol. iv. 16; Ecclus. xliii. 20; Luke xii. 55. It whirleth about continually] The whole verse gains in poetic emphasis by a more literal rendering, It goeth to the south, and it circleth to the north, circling-, circling- goeth the wind, and on its circlings returneth the wind. The iteration and order of the words seem to breathe the languor of one who was weary with watching the endless and yet monotonous changes. (Comp. the illustration in Intro- duction, chap, in.) 7. All the rivers run into the sea; yet the sea is not ftdl~\ The words express the wonder of the earliest observers of the phenomena of nature : as they observed, the poet described. So we have in Aristophanes {Clouds, 1248), clvtt] fih (77 BaXaTTo) ovhev yiyveraL iwLppeovTOJV tQv irora/xcov, Tr\elwv. " The sea, though all the rivers flow to it, Increaseth not in volume." Lucretius, representing the physical science of the school of Epicurus, thought it worth his while to give a scientific explanation of the fact : "Principio, mare mirantur non reddere majus Naturam, quo sit tantus decursus aquarum." "And first men wonder Nature leaves the sea Not greater than before, though to it flows So great a rush of waters." LUCRET. VI. 608. thither they return again] We are apt to read into the words the theories of modern science as to the evaporation from the sea, the clouds formed by evaporation, the rain falling from the clouds and replenishing the streams. It may be questioned, however, whether that theory, which Lucretius states almost as if it were a discovery, were present to the mind of the Debater and whether he did not rather think of the waters of the ocean filtering through the crevices of the earth and so feeding its wells and fountains. The Epicurean poet himself accepts this as a partial solution of phenomena, and on the view taken in the Introduction as to the date of Ecclesiastes it may well have been known v. 8.] ECCLESIASTES, I. 107 again. All things are full of labour; man cannot utter it: \ the eye is not satisfied with seeing, nor the ear filled with to the author as one of the physical theories of the school of Epicurus. We can scarcely fail, at any rate, to be struck with the close parallelism of expression. "Postremo quoniam raro cum corpore tellus Est, et conjuncta est, oras maris undique cingens, Debet, ut in mare de terris venit umor aquai, In terras itidem manare ex aequore salso; Percolatur enim virus, retroque remanat Materies humoris, et ad caput amnibus omnis Confluit; inde super terras redit agmine dulci." "Lastly since earth has open pores and rare, And borders on the sea, and girds its shores, Need must its waters, as from earth to sea They flow, flow back again from sea to earth, And so the brackish taint is filtered off And to the source the water back distils, And from fresh fountains streams o'er all the fields." LUCRET. VI. 63I — 637. The same thought is found in Homer, II. xxi. 196, "Ocean's strength From which all rivers flow," and is definitely stated in the Chaldee paraphrase of the verse now before us. Comp. also Lucret. v. 270 — 273. An alternative rendering gives "to the place whither the rivers go, thither they return again" or "thence they return again." 8. All things are full of labour] The Hebrew dabar may mean either "word" or "thing," and so the sentence admits equally of this or the nearly equivalent rendering, All things are 'weary with toil and All words are feeble, and each gives, it is obvious, a fairly tenable meaning. The first generalizes as by an induction from the previous instances, that all things (especially, i. e. all human affairs) are alike "stale, flat and unprofitable." The latter stops in the induction to say that all speech is feeble, that time and strength would fail to go through the catalogue. On the whole, looking to the fact that the verb "utter" is cognate in form with the word translated "things," the latter seems more closely in harmony with the context. We might fairly express the force of the Hebrew by saying All speech fails; man cannot speak it. The seeming tautology gives the sentence the emphasis of iteration. So the LXX. and the Targum. the eye is not satisfied with seeing] The thought is limited by the context. It is not that the Debater speaks of the cravings of sight and hearing for ever-new objects, true as that might be; but that wherever the eye or the ear turn, the same sad tale meets them, the same paradox of an unvarying record of endless yet monotonous variation The state which Lucretius (11. 1037) describes, probably as echoing Epicurus, that 108 ECCLESIASTES, I. [w. 9— n. 9 hearing. The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: 10 and there is no new thing under the sun. Is there any thing whereof it may be said, See, this is new? it hath been it already of old time, which was before us. There is no of one "fessus satiate videndi," presents a parallelism too striking to be passed over. 9. The thing that hath been] What has been affirmed of natural phenomena is now repeated of the events of human life. The writer reproduces or anticipates the Stoic doctrine of a recurring cycle of events which we find reproduced in Virgil : "Magnus ab integro sseclorum nascitur ordo. Alter erit turn Tiphys, et altera quae vehat Argo Delectos heroas; erunt etiam altera bella, Atque iterum ad Troiam magnus mittetur Achilles." "Lo! the great cycle runs its course anew: A second Tiphys springs to life, and steers A second Argo with its warrior freight Of chosen heroes, and new wars arise, And once again Achilles sails for Troy." Virg. Eel. iv. 5, 34—36. 10. Is there any thing] A man may challenge, the writer seems to say, the sweeping assertion just uttered. He may point to some new phenomenon, some new empire, some invention of art, or discovery of science. It is all to no purpose. It has been before in the vast aeons (the Hebrew word for "of old time" is the plural of that commonly translated "age" or "eternity") of the recorded or unrecorded past. It is but an oblivion of what has been that makes us look to that which is to be as introducing a new element in the world's history. The thought was a favourite one with the Stoics. For a full account of their doctrine on this point see Zeller's Stoics and Epicureans, ch. VII. Aurelius does but sum up the teaching of the school, where he says, almost in the very words of Ecclesiastes, that "they that come after us will see nothing new, and that they who went before us saw nothing more than we have seen" (]\Ieditt. xi. 1). "There is nothing new" (Ibid. VII. 1). "All things that come to pass now have come to pass before and will come to pass hereafter" (Ibid. VII. 26). So Seneca (Ep. xxiv.), "Omnia transeunt ut rroertantur ; Nil novi video, nil novi facio" ("All things pass away that they may return again ; I see nothing new, I do nothing new.") 11. There is 710 remembrance of former things] Better, of former men, or of those of old time, and so in the next clause of those that shall come after. The thought of the oblivion of the past, suggested in the previous verse, as explaining the fact that some things seem new to us which are not so, is reproduced in another aspect as yet a new element in the pessimism into which the writer has fallen. vv. 12, 13.] ECCLESIASTES, I. 109 remembrance of former things; neither shall there be any remembrance of things that are to come with those that shall come after. I the Preacher was king over Israel in Jerusalem. And I gave my heart to seek and search out by wisdom concern- Men dream of a fame that shall outlive them. How few of those that went before them do they remember even by name? How little do they know even of those whose names have survived amid the wreck that has engulfed others? What does it profit to be famous now, just known by name to the generation that follows, and then forgotten alto- gether? Comp. a striking passage to the same effect in Jeremy Taylor's Contemplations of the State of Man, ch. III., "The name of Echebar was thought by his subjects to be eternal, and that all the world did not only know but fear him ; but ask here in Europe who he was, and no man hath heard of him ; demand of the most learned, and few shall resolve you that he reigned in Magor," and Marc. Aurel. Meditt. II. 17, 77 vaTepo(f)7]juta, \rjdr}, "posthumous fame is but oblivion." So ends the prologue of the book, sounding its terrible sentence of despair on life and all its interests. It is hardly possible to turn to the later work, which also purports to represent the Wisdom of Solomon, without feeling that its author deliberately aimed at setting forth another aspect of things. He reproduces well-nigh the very words of the prologue, "the breath of our nostrils is as smoke "..."our name shall be forgotten in time: our life shall pass away as the trace of a cloud "...but he puts all this into the mouth not of his ideal Solomon but of "ungodly men,., reasoning with themselves but not aright," Wisd. ii. 1 — 5, and shews how it leads first to sensuous self-indulgence, and then to deliberate oppression, and persistent antagonism to God. (See Introdtiction, chap, v.) 12. I the Preacher was king over Israel] Better, "I... have been king." It would, perhaps, be too much to say that this mode of intro- ducing himself, is so artificial as to exclude, as some have thought, the authorship of the historical Solomon. Louis XIV.'s way of speaking of himself " Quand fetois roi" may well have had its parallel, as Mr Bullock suggests in the Speaker's Commentary, in the old age of another king weary of the trappings and the garb of Majesty. As little, how- ever, can they be held to prove that authorship. A writer aiming at a dramatic impersonation of his idea of Solomon would naturally adopt some such form as this and might, perhaps, adopt it in order to indicate that it was an impersonation. The manner in which the son of David appears in Wisd. vii. 1 — 15 presents at once a parallel and a contrast. 13. I gave my heart] The phrase, so expressive of the spirit of an earnest seeker, is eminently characteristic of this book and meets us again in ver. 17, chaps, vii. 25, viii. 9, 16. Like forms are found in Isai. xli. 42; Ps. xlviii. 14. "Heart" with the Hebrews, it may be noticed, is the seat of the intellect as well as the affections, and "to give the heart " is therefore specially expressive of an act of concentrated mental energy. The all that is done under heaven (we note the variation of phrase no ECCLESIASTES, I. [w. 14—16. ing all things that are done under heaven : this sore travail hath God given to the sons of man to be exercised there- i 4 with. I have seen all the works that are done under the 15 sun; and behold, all is vanity and vexation of spirit. That which is crooked cannot be made straight : and that which 16 is wanting cannot be numbered. I communed with mine from the "under the sun" of verse 9) takes in the whole range of human action as distinct from the cosmical phenomena of verses 5 — 7. The enquiry of the seeker was throughout one of ethical rather than physical investigation. this sore travail] The words express the feeling with which the writer looked back on his inquiry. It had led to no satisfying result, and the first occurrence of the name of God in the book is coupled with the thought that this profitless search was His appointment. He gave the desire but, so the preacher murmurs in his real or seeming pessim- ism, not the full Truth in which only the desire can rest. The word for "travail" is peculiar to this book. That for "exercised" is formed from the same root. 14. all is vanity and vexation of spirit] The familiar words, though they fall in with the Debater's tone and have the support of the Vulg. "afflictio spiritus" hardly express the meaning of the Hebrew and we must read "vanity and feeding upon wind." The phrase has its parallel in Hos. xii. 2 ("Ephraim feedeth on wind") and Isai. xliv. 20 ("feedeth on ashes") and expresses, with a bold vividness, the sense of emptiness which accompanies unsatisfied desire. Most commentators, however, prefer the rendering "striving after the wind" or "windy effort," but "feeding" expresses, it is believed, the meaning of the Hebrew more closely. The LXX. gives wpoalpeacs vpevfiaros ( = resolve of wind, i.e. fleeting and unsubstantial). Symmachus gives ^6aK-qci.s and Aquila vofi-fi ( = feeding). The word in question occurs seven times in Eccle- siastes but is not found elsewhere. The rendering "vexation" rests apparently on a false etymology. 15. That which is crooked] The words are apparently a proverbial saying quoted as already current. The complaint is that the search after wisdom brings the seeker face to face with anomalies and defects, which yet he cannot rectify. The Hebrew words are not the same, but we may, perhaps, trace an allusive reference to the promise of Isai. xl. 4 that "the crooked shall be made straight," and the Debater in his present mood looks on this also as a delusive dream. There is nothing left but to take things as they are and "accept the inevitable." Comp. chap. vii. 13, as expressing the same thought. that which is wanting] The second clause presents the negative aspect of the world's defects as "crooked" did the positive. Every- where, if there is nothing absolutely evil, there is an "incompleteness" which we cannot remedy, any more than our skill in arithmetic can make up for a deficit which stares us in the face when we look into an account, and the seeker had not as yet attained to the faith which sees v. 17.] KCCLESIASTES, I. ill own heart, saying, Lo, I am come to great estate, and have gotten more wisdom than all they that have been before me in Jerusalem : yea, my heart had great experience of wis- dom and knowledge. And I gave my heart to know wis- beyond that incompleteness the ultimate completeness of the Divine order. 16. Lo, I am come to great estate] The pronoun is used emphati- cally. The verb in the Hebrew is connected closely with what follows and speaks not of outward majesty but of "becoming great," in wisdom. So taken we may read, "I became great and increased in wisdom more than all." We note again, as in verse 13, the kind of dialogue which the Debater holds with his inner consciousness. He "communes with his heart" (comp. Ps. iv. 4, lxxvii. 6). So Marcus Aurelius gave to the book which we call his Meditations, the title rd els eavrop — literally, "Things for myself" or "Self-communings." they that have been before me in Jerusalem] Better, "over Jerusalem." Those who maintain the late origin of the book point to this apparent retrospect over a long series of predecessors as betraying, or possibly as intended to indicate, the pseudonymous authorship. The historical Solomon, it is said, had but one predecessor over Jerusalem. The inference is, however, scarcely conclusive. Even on the theory of personated authorship, the writer would scarcely have slipped into so glaring an anachronism, and the words admit of being referred, on either view, either lo the line of unknown Jebusite rulers, including perhaps Melchizedek (Gen. xiv. 18), Adonizedek (Josh. xv. 63; 1 Sam. v. 7) and others, or to the sages "Ethan the Ezrahite and Heman and Chalcol and Darda the sons of Mahol," who are named in r Kings iv. 31, and who may, in some sense, as teachers and guides, have been "over" as well as "in" Jerusalem. Some MSS. indeed give the preposition "in" instead of "over." my heart had great experience] More literally, and at the same time more poetically, my heart hath seen much wisdom and knowledge. The two nouns are related, like the Greek aotpia. and e7ri 38)- 7. A time to rent, and a time to sezu] The words are commonly con- nected with the practice of rending the garments as a sign of sorrow (Gen. xxxvii. 29, 34, xliv. 13 ; Job i. 20; 2 Sam. i. 2) and sewing them up again when the season of mourning is past and men return again to the routine of their daily life. It is, however, somewhat against this view that it makes this generalisation practically identical with that of verse 4. The symbolic use of "rending a garment" to represent the division of a kingdom, as in the prophecy of Ahijah the Shilonite (1 Kings xi. 50) and therefore of "sewing" for the restoration of unity (so the "seam- ECCLESIASTES Q tjo ECCLESIASTES, III. [v. 8. A time to keep silence, and a time to speak; A time to love, and a time to hate; A time of war, and a time of peace. less garment" of John xix. 23 has always been regarded as a type of the unity of Christ's Church) seems to suggest a more satisfying sense. There are seasons when it is wise to risk or even to cause discord and division in families (Matt. x. 34, 35) or schism in Church or State, other seasons when men should strive to restore unity and to be healers of the breach (Isai. lviii. 12). In the parable of the New Patch upon the old Garment we have an instance of an inopportune sewing which does but make the rent worse (Matt. ix. 16). a time to keep silence, and a time to speak] Here again the range of thought has been needlessly limited by interpreters to the silence which belongs to deep sorrow, of which we have an example in the conduct of the friends of Job (Job ii. 12, 13), of the want of which in the sons of the prophets Elisha complained bitterly (2 Kings ii. 3, 5). This is, of course, not excluded, but the range of the law is wider, and takes in on the one hand, the unseasonable talk of the "prating fool" of Prov. x. 8, and on the other the "word spoken in due season" (Prov. xv. 23), to one that is weary (Isai. 1. 4), the right word at the right time, in the utterance of which we rightly see a genius akin to inspiration. If it is true at times that speech is silvern and silence golden, there are times when the con- verse also is true, when the word in season is like "apples of gold ( = per- haps, oranges) in a basket of silver" (Prov. xxv. n). 8. A time to love, and a time to hate] Greek thought again supplies us with a parallel, 77/uets 5e 7tc5s ov yvwa6[xea9a aojcppovelv; eyw 5', i7riaTajJ.ai yap aprlws on 6 t ex&pbs ypuv is Toaovb" ixOapreos, cos koX