THE CAPTURE OF FORT FISHER 1 .': A I mNBbM ' R5\p THE CAPTURE OP FORT FISHER By Ma^ .-Gen. Adalbert Ames Addresses to New York Oommandery, Loyal Legion. 3rd Series. N.Y.1907 W$t Hibtavy of the Untbersrttp of Jgortf) Carolina Collection of J?ottf) Carolmtana Cnootoeb ftp f ofm g>prunt ^tll of the Class of 1889 Cp3Hom_P)Si Personal Recollections of the Rebellion THE CAPTURE OF FORT FISHER, NORTH CAROLINA, JANUARY 15, 1865. Read by Brevet Major-General Adelbert Ames, late U. S. Army, February 3, 1897. ABOUT the first of December, 1864, when in com- mand of the 2d Division, Twenty-fourth Corps, of the Army of the James, then before Richmond, Va., I was notified I had been selected to lead my division in a movement by sea, against some point of the Con- federacy on the Atlantic coast. At that time Wilmington, N. C, was the port through which the Confederacy received a large part of its munitions of war, and whence was shipped to England, in payment therefor, much of its cotton and tobacco.. Wilmington was situated on the east bank of the Cape Fear River, thirty miles from its mouth, which was guarded by Fort Fisher. Our Navy was untiring in its efforts to blockade that port, but was not successful. The order from General Butler to General Weitzel rela- tive to the expedition December 6th, 1864, was: > " The Major-General commanding has entrusted you with the command of the expedition about to embark for -^he North Carolina coast. It will consist of 6500 infantry, two batteries, 2 THE CAPTURE OF FORT FISHER and fifty cavalry. The effective men of General Ames's division of the Twenty-fourth Corps will furnish the infantry force. Gen- eral Paine is under your orders, and General Ames will be ordered to report to you in person immediately." My division, of three brigades, was composed of New Hampshire, New York, Pennsylvania, and Indiana troops, about 3300 in number. General Paine had a division of colored troops. We embarked at Bermuda Hundreds, Va., December 8th, and our transports reached the place of rendezvous off New Inlet, N. C, Thursday the 15th. Friday, Saturday, and Sunday, we awaited the coming of the Navy. Admiral Porter, commanding our fleet, arrived Sunday evening the 18th. The next day the water was too rough to make a landing on the ocean beach. Towards evening, a northeast gale coming up, the transports were, sent to Beaufort for coal and water, as the ten days' supply had run short, where they were delayed by the weather and the difficulty of getting coal, until Saturday the 24th. I did not go to Beaufort, as my ship, on which I had one of my brigades, was well prepared for such an emergency. General Butler, followed by his fleet of transports, re- turned to New Inlet on Saturday the 24th of December, between four and five o'clock in the afternoon. The powder boat, which played such a notorious part in this expedition, had been exploded at about two o'clock on the morning of the same day. The idea of the powder boat was General Butler's, but it was approved of and adopted by the Navy, which fur- nished the vessel and its share of the 215 tons of gunpowder used. The Navy held control of this experiment from first to last. The explosion was untimely, and a failure. Commodore Jeffers of the Navy reports: "A part of the programme required that the vessel should be grounded, which appears not to have been the case." Commander Rhind writes: "That, owing to the want of confinement and insufficient fusing of the mass, much THE CAPTURE OF FORT FISHER 3 of the powder was blown away before ignition and its effect lost." Admiral Porter reports: "That the powder was finally exploded from the effects of a fire kindled in the forecastle. No results of value were to be expected from this mode. It was proposed only as a final resort, in order to prevent the vessel, in any contingency, from falling into the hands of the enemy." Commander James Parker, U. S. Navy, stated to the New York Loyal Legion, October 5, 1892 : " We all believed in it [the powder boat] from the Admiral down, but when it proved so laughable a failure we, of the Navy, laid its paternity upon General Butler." Colonel Lamb, in command, describes Fort Fisher as follows : " At the land-face of Fort Fisher the peninsula was about half a mile wide, Cape Fear River being on one side and the Atlantic Ocean on the other. This face commenced about a hundred feet from the river with a half bastion, and extended with a heavy curtain to a full bastion on the ocean side, where it joined the sea-face. The work was built to withstand the heaviest artillery fire. The outer slope was twenty feet high from the berm to the top of the parapet, at an angle of forty-five degrees, and was sodded with marsh grass, which grew luxuriantly. The parapet was not less than twenty-five feet thick, with an inclination of only one foot. The revetment was five feet nine inches high, from the floor of the gun chambers, and these were some twelve feet or more from the interior plane. The guns were all mounted in barbette, Columbiad carriages; there was not a single casemated gun in the fort. Between the gun chambers, containing one or two guns each (there were twenty heavy guns on the land-face) , there were (some eighteen) heavy traverses, exceeding in size any known to engineers, to protect from an enfilading fire. They extended out some twelve feet on the parapet, running back thirty feet or more. The gun chambers were reached from the rear by steps. In each traverse was an alternate magazine or bomb-proof, the latter ventilated by an air-chamber. Passageways penetrated the traverses in the interior of the work, forming additional bomb-proofs for the reliefs of the guns. tf- — ■ 4 THE CAPTURE OF FORT FISHER " The sea-face was a mile long, and for a hundred yards from the northeast bastion was of the same massive character as the land-face. "Asa defence against infantry there was a system of subterre torpedoes extending across the peninsula, five to six hundred feet from the land-face and so disconnected that an explosion of one would not affect the others; inside the torpedoes, about fifty feet from the berm of the work, extending from the river bank to the seashore, was a heavy palisade of sharpened logs nine feet high, pierced for musketry, and so laid out as to have an enfilading fire on the centre, where there was a redoubt guarding a sally-port from which two Napoleons were run out as occasion required. At the river end of the palisade was a deep and muddy slough, across which was a bridge, the entrance on the river road into the fort ; commanding this bridge was a Napoleon gun. There were three mortars in rear of the land-face." This strong work had, at the time of our first expedition, a garrison of 1400 men, 900 of whom were veterans. Colonel Lamb had been incited to the utmost by General Lee, who had sent him word that he "must hold the fort or he could not subsist his army." On the morning of the 24th the fleet of Admiral Porter moved in towards New Inlet and opened fire on the fort. The character of this bombardment and the demands made by the Admiral on his ships and sailors I will let him tell. ' In his letter to the Secretary of the Navy of the 24th of December, 1864, he says: " I have the honor to inform you that I attacked the forts at the mouth of the Cape Fear River to-day at 12.30. . . . After getting the ships in position we silenced it in about an hour and a half, there being no troops here to take possession. I am merely firing now to keep up practice. The forts are nearly demolished, and as soon as troops come we can take possession. We have set them on fire, blown some of them up, and all that is wanted now is troops to land and go into them." The Admiral failed to mention, in his letter, the fact that I had offered 1000 men and co-operation, although, in his testimony before the Committee on the Conduct of THE CAPTURE OF FORT FISHER 5 the War, he said: "General Ames had a thousand men there, and he sent on board and told me he was ready to land." In his letter of the 26th he says, referring to the bom- bardment of the 24th: "In an hour and fifteen minutes after the first shot was fired not a shot came from the fort. Finding that the batteries were silenced completely I directed the ships to keep up a moderate fire in hopes of attracting the attention of the transports and bringing them in." In this same letter of December 26th Admiral Porter says, speaking of the bombardment of the forts on December 25th: " The firing this day was slow, only sufficient to amuse the enemy while the army landed. In the bombardment of the 25th the men were engaged firing slowly for seven hours. . . . Everything was coolly done throughout the day, and I witnessed some beautiful practice." In a letter to the Secretary of the Navy, December 29th, after the fleet had left and the transports had gone back to Hampton Roads, he writes : " At no time did I permit the vessels to open on them with all their batteries, limiting some of them to about two shots a minute, and permitting the large vessels to fight only one division of guns at a time; and the bombardment cost only a certain amount of shells, which I would expend in a month's target practice anyhow." Such are the salient features of the reports of Admiral Porter. General Whiting, who was in the fort, and who com- manded that military district, says the slight damage done by this cannonading was repaired at night, and that "the garrison was in no instance driven from its guns, the palisade was in perfect order, and the mines the same, the wires not having been cut." General Weitzel testified before the Committee on the 6 THE CAPTURE OF FORT FISHER Conduct of the War: " I made a reconnoissance of the fort and saw that the work, as a defensive work, was not injured at all, except that one gun about midway of the land-face was dismounted. I did not see a single opening in the row of palisades that was in front of the ditch ; it seemed to be per- fectly intact." All in the fort agree that Admiral Porter was mistaken as to the effects of the cannonading. So much as to the condition of the fort. On the morning of the 25th all our transports anchored near the shore some two or three miles north of the fort, and the troops immediately began to land. I had been selected to storm the fort with my division. My report on December 28th is as follows: " Brevet Brig. Gen. Curtis and 500 of his brigade were the first to land, and were taken towards the fort by Gen Weitzel for a reconnoissance. ... It was dusk when I reached the front. I then heard that the First Brigade was to remain where it was until further orders, and that if any attack was made the responsibility would rest with the officer in immediate command. At this time I did not know that it had been decided not to attack the fort. Upon the report of Curtis that he could take the fort I sent his brigade forward to make the attempt." In his report Curtis says : " On my arrival at this point I received orders from Gen. Ames to return and re-establish my lines as they were, and, if possible, to occupy the fort, and I at once ordered my skirmishers forward, etc. . . . The enemy, having cover of the darkness, opened on the skirmishers as they advanced with musketry and canister, but did not prevent their establishing the line in its former position, with the reserves in close proximity." Curtis made no further effort to take the fort, as I had ordered him to do, but sent word to me that he was " occupy- ing his former position." Why he failed to assault the fort after I assumed the responsibility and gave the order I have never known. At this time an order reached me to return to our ships, which we did, and the first expedition ended. THE CAPTURE OF FORT FISHER 7 An incident occurred which had much to do in giving an erroneous idea of the condition of the fort and garrison. One of our lieutenants approached the fort and captured its flag, which had been shot away by the Navy, and which had fallen with the flagstaff on the outer slope of the parapet to the ditch. On this point General Weitzel testifies : " I sent for Lieut. Walling and questioned him about it, and he told me that a shell had knocked the flagstaff outside and on top of the parapet, and the flag hung over into or outside of the ditch. Thinking that probably the rebels had not observed it, he crept up on his hands and knees to the palisading, found a hole in it that one of the shells had made, crept through the hole and up to the flag, and got it and got away with it without being observed." Let us see why our expedition terminated thus abruptly. Weitzel had been ordered by Butler to land and make a reconnoissance. In his testimony before the Committee on the Conduct of the War he gave his experience during the war in charging and defending field works, and con- tinuing, said: " After that experience, with the information I had obtained from reading and study — for before this war I was an instructor at the Military Academy for three years under Professor Mahan, on those very subjects — remembering well the remarks of the Lieutenant- General commanding, that it was his intention I should command that expedition, because another officer se- lected by the War Department had once shown timidity, and in face of the fact that I had been appointed a Major- General only twenty days before, and needed confirmation; notwithstanding all this, I went back to Gen. Butler, and told him I considered it would be murder to order an attack on that work with that force." Colonel Lamb says, in reference to the loss of his flag : " I had no fear of an assault, and because, during a bombard- ment which rendered an assault impossible, I covered my men, and a few straggling skirmishers, too few to attract attention, got near the fort, and some gallant officers thought they could