m^ w^^m^m •mm. WA vv^' Jh iA' \ CHRISTIAN MYSTEllY % ^t)inc6c iiralc. FOUND IN THE PORTFOLIO OF A POHTUGUE.^E FRIAR. Hoar, O j)ro(Hgy ; () Tciiilonicss ! O Mystery ! --He lias just drowned the Fathers j— and now Lc v. ill die fur the Cliildren ! Voltaire. I u miimtiit^.M]k.^Utt^ta^»ti I'lUNTEU AND I'UBL'ISIIED 15Y U. CAIILILE, 55, FLEET STllELT. SRLF URL oo/4-ooG9j2xr t CHRISTIAN MYSTERY, ^'6'. dfC. Commercial affairs had engaged me to make a sea voyage. I had got far from the shores of my native country, when a dreadful tempest threw me on an unknown coast ; however, I fell into the hands of a very humane people, and soon found they had brought the arts to great perfection, that they practised many virtues, and appeared to me in a state as en- lightened as humanity could attain. My admiration of them equalled my gratitude, but, alas ! it is but too true, that man always discovers by some failing the weakness of his being. ^ These people shewed as much friendship towards me as 1 could possibly do to them ; their mildness and civility entirely gained my affection. They said to me one day, " Of what religion are you ? The ques- tion surprised me ; I asked them if there were two religions, at which they smiled, and I saw they were astonished at my ignorance. " My friend," said one of them, " give thanks to God for having conducted you amongst us to be instructed in our holy religion. You do not know then that God has made himself a man ?" I assured them it was the first time I had heard of it, and asked them why he had become a man ? Know, continued they, " that the first man ate an apple which God had forbidden him, inconsequence of which all his posterity were condemned to eternal punishment. At another time men became so crimi- 2000416 4 CHRISTIAN MYSTERY. nal that the Ahiiighty repented of having created them, and drowned them all with the exception of eight per- sons. The posterity of these became no better, God continued to be displeased, and as it was necessary to reconcile him to mankind, God the Son became a man to appease God the Father.'* This divine family astonished me a little. And the daughter of God, said I, what is become of her ? They answered gravely, " God has no daughter." Oh ! he has but a Son : but how do you know the sex of this Son } They answered, God is incorporeal, he has no sex. I insisted how could God the Fa- ther produce God the Son ? He begot liim. God has a sex then, he must also have a wife. They smiled at me again. But when did the father beget this Son ? From all eternity. My friends, there is an apparent contradiction, it is not possible for the Son who was begotten to be as old as the leather. Has the Father then any other children ? No ; but there is a third person who proceeds from the Father and the Son. 1 suppose he was begotten also? No; certainly not : pray take care what you say, or you will be guilty of heresy. I replied, I did not understand them. O, Sir, these are mysteries which God himself has revealed to men, to the end that they might under- stand nothing. Wonderful, said I. They continued : God wished to humble men's reason, that is, to give them a disregard for the most precious gift they hold of his bounty. And you make no use of your reason then } O yes ; we are allowed to use it in all other actions of our lives, but in matters of religion it would be impious. Better and better, said I. So then I find you have three Gods ? No, no, replied they, we have indeed three persons, of whom the first is the Father, the second is the Son, or word, the third is the Holy Spirit ; but all these three make only one God. How, Gentlemen ? these three make but one, and one makes three ? Yeg ; it is so, replied they, though CHRISTIAN IVIY8TEKY. o contrary to all tlie rules of arithmetic ; you must know that our theology is far superior to this petty science ; however we will explain the whole to you. What do you call the third person ? said 1. The Holy Ghost. Has the Holy Ghost been a man also ? No ; but he became a pigeon ; we do not know, in- deed, that it was his natural form, but when he appeared to the apostles he was pleased to borrow that shape. And the Son of God has been a man from all eter- nity ? O no, only seventeen hundred years. Of whom, and how was he born ? He was born of a virgin. She would certainly be much surprised know- ing herself to be a virgin ? O yes ; you are right ; but an angel came to prepare her, that she might not be alarmed in being brought to-bed. Yet I suppose you will be still more surprised when we tell you she was married ? O no ; pardon me, I understand this mys- tery better than all the others. Nay, do not jest. Sir, her husband had not slept with her ; we have it so revealed to us. And pray how did she conceive ? By the operation of the Holy Ghost. But you say that the Holy Ghost proceeds from the Son ; how then could he produce the Son } Yes, Sir, it is so, by the infallible decision of the holy church. And who was his mother? The wife of a carpenter. \\ hat kind of a life did he lead ? He sierved thirty years in his father's shop, and was very serviceable to him. Indeed, gentlemen; very well ! 1 perceive you have sublime notions of the di- vinity. •- At the age of thirty he began to preach to the people in the country, which lasted some time ; at length the magistrates became displeased, because in his sermons he said a great deal about rich men, and the officers of government. He foresaw diat he would be punished, and perspired both water and blood. Indeed ! that is another fine trait in his cha- racter. At length hv was arrested by the magistrates, and crucified betwi-en two robbers. And he died ? Yes, And was buried ^ Yes. Well then 1 su|>pose that is B CiUUSTlAN MYSTEUy. the end ot his liistory ? Hold, Sir, you go too fast ; he died, it is true, but it was in consideration that God would pardon mankind. Oh, 1 understand you. GotI would pardon the sins of mankind because they had killed his Son. Truly, nothing could be better ima- gined. But know for testimony of his divinity, he rose again the third day. And what proof have yon of this ? The writings of the disciples. But what said the people ? They contradicted it. (Jl), gentlemen ! I find you are as well provided with proofs as with reasonings; f)utdid he perform any other miracles ? Yes ; he cured those possessed of evil spirits ; dried a fig tree ; sent devils into a herd of swine ; filled the nets of his disciples with fishes, and changed water into wine ; but he loved so to hum- ble himself, that never in his life did he own that he was God. And why do you l)elieve it ? His secta- ries have disputed a long time on this important arti- cle, as well as of the Holy Ghost, because three persons were not spoken of in the Old Testament. The Holy Ghost was found out to be God after twelve hundred years had passed over, and as for the divinity of Jesus, three hundred years of disputes, troubles, and massacres sufficed to decide the matter in his favour. As you love this God so much, 1 suppose he was born in your country ? No ; he was born in another (juarter of the globe. Indeed ! You go very far to seek your gods ! He must then have left a book of doctrines of religion, which you thought proper to adopt ? No ! he did not teach a new religion, neither did he write any thing ; but some of his disciples have written his history and discourses. And your religion is there exactly prescribed ? Oh, no ! We have only a few particulars of his life, accompanied by some moral precepts ; he has there declared that he came to fulfil the ancient law, and not to change it. rhen there was a particular religion in the country where he was born, before his time } Yes. And it CHRISTIAN MYSTERY. 7 is that same religion that yoii still observe ? No ; ours is in direct opposition to it. But whence then is this new relimon, for vou own that it was never announced by your God ? We haveexplained, commented, interpreted with- out ceasing these seventeen hundri'd years on the dis- courses of Christ ; and have drawn from them a long succession of dogmas and mysteries quite new. And do you all agree in these interpretations ? No; far from it. We have always been disputing, fighting, and killing one another on account of then!. Weil, 1 am very sorry to tell you that 1 do not think your religion very attracting. What do you say ? You do not agree in your explanations, and you <|uarrel and kill each other about them ? Your religion does not at all please me ; yet I supj)()se it had been adopted by the people of the country where your God dwelt r You are again deceived ; Christ had l)ut a very small number of disciples, and these were from the lowest class of the people. Have we not already told you that he was put to death by order of the magistrates ? What do you say, gentlemen ? Was not his doctrine believed by the people he attempted to instruct? No, His miracles, have they not persuaded those who were witnesses ? No. And why should you believe them ; you who came seventeen hundred years after him ? O, Sir, all things require an explanation. Know then that God sent his Son among this people whose hearts he had hardened, purposely that they might not believe in him. Well explained ! T am quite delighted with youi mode of reasoning ; but pray what name do you give this people? Jews. — Jews! Jews! I never heard of them. No, I believe you. They occupied such a small territory, that their reputation did not ex- tend lar ; nevertluless, they were formerly (iod's fa- vourite people. God chose them from among all the nations of the earth ; he governed them himself, and often conversed with their chiefs. Sometimes through tenderness for his people he ordered them to massacre 6 CI?RISTiAN MYSTERY. each other ; and at one time twenty three thousand were put to death by their own citizens at the express command of God. God ordered one of the kines to murder every man of a nation they had vanquished ; the king had the au- dacity to spare some who were not in a state to defend themselves and was punished for it. A son of this king was condemned to die for eating honey on the day of battle, and God, who was justly irritated at the father as well as son, proscribed them both, and made choice of a new king. This king (whom God had expressly chosen) com- mitted adultery with the wife of one of his generals, and massacred her husband. By the adultress he had a son who kept seven hundred vi^ives and three hundred concubines in his seraglio ; but you must know these two kings were cherished by our God ; both had heavenly benedictions heaped on their heads. The father was the tnan after God*s own heart, and the son was the wisest of men. The Son of God, who became a fnan, descended in direct line from this wisest of men^ and from the adultress of whom we have just spoken. O, gentlemen, exclaimed I, you make me shudder at your impious ideas. They resumed. Have we not told you that the conduct of this God was always mysterious, purposely to humble our weak reason ? The first legislator whom God gave to his favourite people was an assassin ; but he had nevertheless the gift of performing a number of miracles. He composed a body of civil and religious rites and laws which we still revere as having been inspired by the Deity. And yet, you do not observe them } No ; truly. We bold those people in horror who do so. It is true, that this was formerly the favourite people of God, and all other nations were rejected ; afterwards the other nations were chosen, and this favourite people rejected. Do you not admire, Sir, the wisdom of the God We adore ? CHRISTIAN MYSTERY. 9 At this discourse, I stole away from them, and could scarcely persuade myself it was more than a dream. Having before seen to what great perfection this people had attained in every human science, I began to fear the weakness of my nature, and deter- mined to return to my country; lest those abominable European prejudices should make me forget my duty to my fellow-creatures, and reverence for the God of all worlds. THE END. THOUGHTS ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION BY A DEIST. TO WHICH AltE ADD to, A FEW IDEAS ON MIRACULOUS CONVERSION, AND RELIGION IN GENERAL. BY A THEO PHILANTHROPIST iioniron: PRlNIIiD ANJ> PUBLISHED BY R. CARLILE, 55, FLEET STREEr. IS 19. THOUGHTS, Sfc. 6f'c. Religion, in some form or other, seems to have been observed by mankind, in all ages and all parts of the world ; and considered as the most noble employ- ment, of the most divine nature, and producing the most beneficial effects to society, of all the objects that ever engaged their attention : although from casual circumstances, and interested motives of indi- viduals, there are as many modes and varieties of worship, as languages or nations on the face of the earth. Europeans have in general embraced Christianity, as contained in the Bible, which thei/ call the Word of God, as the only true and infallible S3'stem on earth, and which only can lead us to eternal happi- ness. This Bible, we have been taught to believe, is holy, just, perfect, and superior to the human under- standing ; so sacred, that to doubt or disbelieve it, would entail on us inevitable never-ending misery. This doctrine, being instilled into children by their nurses, and enforced by terror at a riper age, has long been as- sented to by the generality of people^ who seldom think or enquire for themselves, but are always more or less the dupes of designing men. But the times are now changing ; the privilege of reasoning and believing for ourselves begins to be ex- ercised — freedom of enquiry abounds ; and the natu- ral inherent right of speaking and acting according to B 4 THOUGHTS ON THE the dictates of our own conscience (without injuring society) is happily enjo3'ecl. Consecjuently, imposi- tions of every kind, superstitious prejudices, and the long worshipped fabrics of civil and religious tyranny, are daily growing into contempt, and in all probability will soon be torn from their foundations, and con- signed to that infamous oblivion which they so highly merit. To come more immediately to the point — the Chris- tian religion, as generally practised, presents itself as one of those monuments of ignorance and credulity, which the wisdom of the present generation is proba- bly destined to overthrow, and to substitute a system more simple, more pure, and more agreeable to the dictates of reason. The Bible, upon examination, we shall find deficient in many of the virtues that have been ascribed to it. As a liuman composition, its merits have been greatly over-rated : it is exceeded in sentiment, invention, style, and every other literary qualification. The obscurity, incredibility, and obsce- nity, so conspicuous in many parts of it, would justly condemn the works of a modern writer. It contains a mixture of inconsistency and contradiction ; to call which the word of God, is the highest pitch of extra- vagance : it is to attribute to the Deity that which any person of common sense would blush to confess him- self the author of. How are the rights and dignity of human nature insulted, degraded, and trampled upon ! how are man- kind blinded, deceived, and led away by this system ! how is the honour and character of the Almighty af- fronted by the absurd and impious doctrines it con- tains ! How is the sacred name of God abused and ])rostituted to the vilest and most execrable purposes, by his pretended worshippers ! And all for one sim- ple, evident end, to gratify the pride and avarice of unprincipled, designing men ! But something more than declamation is necessary to support these assertions. I shall therefore give the CHRISTIAN RELIGION. 5 reasons why I disbelieve the Christian system, and all the arguments advanced in its favour. As to the existing proofs of the divine authority of the Bible, whether internal or external, whether the evidence we feel in our own minds on examining it, or the miracles which are said to have attended its })ropa- gation, they are of no avail in convincing us of its divine origin: and 1 do not think, that independent of the prejudices of education, and the power of elo- quence, there ever was a reasonable thinking man, who felt a sufficient internal evidence to convince him of the reality of the whole of its doctrines. With respect to the public proofs exhibited by its founders, we find them no stronger than those in favour of Mahometan ism, or perhaps any other sys- tem. Mahomet is said to have wrought as many mi- racles, preached as good doctrine, converted ten times as many followers, and was far more successful in all liis enterprizes, however bold and difficult, than Jesus Christ. The Christians say, the Mahometan miracles were nothing but impostures ; and the Mahometans say, with as much authority, that the Christian mira- cles were the same. If the gospel system was so clear, so reasonable, and so powerful, as its advocates assert, what necessity could there have been for miracles to support it } If it had any foundation in reason and nature, there would have been no occasion for mystery, miracle, or revelation, to confirm it. A doctrine that is reason- able and true, will appear so to every unprejudiced mind, without the aid of any thing supernatural. Consequently, that system which requires miraculous assistance to establish it, and cannot be proved by human means, is neither reasonable nor true. Supposing the Bible to have been written by divine inspiration, at the times, and by the persons mentioned in it, still it is next to impossible, that it could have been transmitted down to the present time pure and iincontaminated, even if there had been but one THOUGHTS ON THE nation and one language upon earth. The variety of translations and editions it has passed through in the course of near 1800 years, if it has existed so long, (which I am inclined to disbelieve of many parts) and the continual improvements and alterations in human language, during that period, amount to a presumptive proof that the sense has been unavoidably mistaken, or wilfully perverted. A confirmation of this remark is open to all : let any one take the trouble of comparing different copies of the Bible, printed in the last and present centuries, or even in the same year, and he will often find a striking disagreement. Admitting that the Bible contains the only doctrine by which we can obtain salvation and everlasting life, which of the numberless professions that have sprung out of it are we to embrace? One sect tells us that there is no salvation out of the pale of their church. Another tells us, that unless we believe and practise their doctrines, we shall surely be damned. Let us believe, therefore, in whatever particular profession we may, we shall be damned according to the principles of the others. How gracious and beneficent is the Christian sys- tem ! so perfect and pure that it creates so many dif- ferent, distinct, and opposite denominations of be- lievers ; all of them right, infallibly right, in their own opinions, and proving their doctrine by the clear, in- contestible authority of divine revelation ! Many, as an excuse for countenancing a doctrine which taey confess may not be true, say, that if the Christian religion be false, it is still very hurtful to at- tempt to overturn it ; as we have no better guide, and no other method to restrain the passions and regulate the conduct of mankind ; as it is the most perfect and beneficial system that could be devised. To deter- mine this, we must look at its effects. That doctrine which has the greatest tendency to secure our preseiit and future happiness is the best ; it proves itself to be so. That the Christian system does CHRISTIAN RELIGION. 7 not tend to make us happier, may easily be shewn, by tracing its natural operations on the human mind. By it we are led to believe, that we are all miserable and ruined wretches ; corrupt and exceedingly wicked from our very birth ; naturally sinful, and opposed to the will of God in all our actions, words, and thoughts ; and so far from deserving the common blessings of life, that if justice had been done us, we should long since have been cast into endless punishment. Tribulation, distress, and sore trials, are the common lot of man- kind, especially the good. " Whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth." This world, it tells us, is a wretched, tiresome, and accursed place ; a mere sink of guilt and misery ; and all its enjoyments vanity and vexation of spirit. Though by the bye, those who are called sincere and pious Christians seem to be as desirous of continu- ing in it, and tasting the good things it affords, as the most sensual and worldly-minded sinner. It likewise instils into its followers such a servile fear, and dread of the wrath of heaven, that they can neither lie down at night, nor rise in the morning, without first attempt- ing, by intreaty, flattery, and fair promises, to appease the Divine anger, and persuade the Almighty to per- mit them to exist in peace. Every accident is a judge- ment, and a prelude to further punishment. Every misfortune that happens to their neighbours is a warn- ins^ to them ; and they are liable every moment to be cut off by an avenging God, and sent to Hell. While on the one hand, they represent the Deity as their servant, to assist them on every occasion, avert- ing every ill they bring upon themselves, and extricat- ing them from every difficulty and distress they plunge themselves into ; on the other he is supposed to be a fierce, revengeful tyrant, delighting in cruelty, punish- ing his creatures for the very sins which he causes them to commit ; and creating numberless millions of immortal souls, that could never have offended him, for the express purpose of tormenting them to all 8 THOUGHTS ON THE eternity. Thus they are generally miserable through life, in meditating on death and its supposed conse- quences. The authority of the Bible appears still more doubt- ful from the absurdities and contradictions it contains; contradictions which all the sophistical ingenuity of reverend divines, with their literal meaning of this text, and spiritual interpretation of that, can never explain or reconcile. In the very first chapter of the whole volume, con- taining an account of the creation, we find an inexpli- cable difficulty. In Genesis i. 27, 28, we are told, that " God created man, male and female, blessed them^ and said unto them^^ &c. But in ii. *iO, we find that " there was not an help meet for Adam :" therefore, ver. 18, "God said, it is not good that man should be alone." And, ver. 22, " he made a woman, and brought her unto the man.^* The Almighty, according to many parts of the Bible, is a perfect, unchangeable being. In Isaiah, he is said to declare, that he is " not as a man, that he should repent." But in other places we read of his repenting very frequently. He repented that he had made man. Flaving determined to destroy the Israel- ites, and having slain seventy thousand of them, " he repented of the evil," and spared the rest. He told Hezekiah that " he should surely die, and not live ;" but immediately repented, and gave him fifteen years longer. Jonah prophesied, in his name, that in forty days Nineveh should be overthrown ; but the people believing him (though he did not perform his promise) and forsaking their sins, he " repented of the evil that he said he would do unto them, and did it not." In one place it says, " Our God is a consuming fire ;" and in another, " God is love.^' He is said to be jealous, revengeful, and angry with the wicked every day ; and pleased again as often as they repent : pos- sessing all the good and evil qualities of man, that CHRISTIAN RELIGION. 9 unstable, wicked, misorahle, and insignificant worm. Notwithstanding all this, he is perfectly just, wise, im- mutable, and can never repent. The Christian system, 1 venture to affirm, has been the cause of more evil in the world, than any other that ever appeared in it. By inculcating a belief that the Deity was a terrible God, an inexorable judge, taking vengeance on all his enemies ; its professors, wishing to conform as much as possible to the charac- ter and disposition of their Godi have in all ages acted with the same spirit, and upon the same principles : <« O let this strong, unerring hand, Tliy boltsybr ever throw ; And deal damnation round the laud, On each I judge thj' foe." Inspired with the most vindictive hatred to all who, do not subscribe to the principles they profess (who are, according to their faith, enemies ; for they say, there is no medium or neutrality, " all who are not for us are against us ;)" they have never failed, in any country, artd at all times, when they had the power, to exercise the most cruel and detestable spirit that ever disgraced human nature. Not contented with insult- ing, oppressing, enslaving, and butchering the poor heretics here, but most humanely and charitably con- demning them to everlasting torments hereafter. During the first 320 years of its existence, Chris- tianity occasioned the destruction of many millions of mankind. In the first part of this period, the Chris- tians were the greatest sufferers; but in the year 312 Maxentius and his army of 200,000, were most of them drowned in the Tiber, or (^lain by Constantine, the Christian emperor, who, in three great battles, in one of which 100,000 were killed, reduced and put to death Licinus, the deputy emperor of the East; perse- cuted the Heathens, and destroyed their idols, the symbols of their divinities. In the twelfth and subsequent centuries, millions of 10 THOUGHTS ON THE Waldenses and Protestants were murdered in the soiitli of France. How many millions lost their lives in the mad crusades for the recovery of the Holy Land !_ In Germany and Flanders, in England, Scotland, and Ireland, in South America. But I stop, or " I could a tale unfold, whose lightest word would harrow up the soul,'' chill the blood with horror, and draw forth curses from the grave against the very name of a religion which has been made the pretext for such cruelties. Indeed, it is impossible to calculate the mischief that has attended the Christian system since its com- mencement. But, say its advocates, all this was done by Antichrist, or the false church. Which then is the true church ? Not that which persecutes. And what church is that } The church of Rome ? No : for that, after long struggles, no sooner became established in power, than it persecuted its dissenting sons with all the zeal and barbarity that it had experienced from its enemies. The church of England ? No : for al- though that separated from the church of Rome, and rejected many of the errors and corruptions which had crept into it ; yet no sooner was it fully established in Great Britain, than it very carefully trod over the steps of the mother church, persecuted Roman Catholics, and all Dissenters. The Puritans, who fled to this country for the sake of freedom of conscience and religious liberty, were no sooner settled, than they dis- covered the same illiberal persecuting spirit which drove them hither, and persecuted the Quakers in their turn ; becoming as corrupt as any of the former churches. Each of them, while they were weak and defenceless, suffered by the murderous hand of its oppressors ; and, when become strong and powerful, persecuted and martyred its feebler enemies. And I believe there is not a church in Christendom but would, if it could not convert, most gladly destroy all its opposers ; had it that one essential and only neces- sary quality, power. For they affirm, that the world. CHRISTIAN RELIGION. U with all its blessings, arc nothing but temptations to draw them away from their true interest ; and that unbelievers of every kind are their natural implacable enemies. The carnal mind, say they, is enmity to God and liis people, (themselves) and is in continual opposition to every thing good and heavenly ; they must then of necessity wage an eternal war against all who do not acknowledge their system, as the only sure guide to heaven. The powerful blow which has been aimed at this system of faith by Pai lie's Age of Reason, has created a general and well-founded alarm. That work, to every bigotted or interested follower of Christianity, appears in a dreadful light indeed, as it is a direct at- tack upon their favourite, their dearly-beloved system of gospel faith, which exalts them, in their own opinions, so much above the rest of mankind. The Christian theology is so favourable to the pride and vanity of man, that the slightest attempt to over- turn it occasions an universal panic in its supporters, who immediately display all the ensigns of their cause, the pompous, high-sounding anathemas of Scripture, to frighten the bold invader of their aerial territories. So far they act consistently ; for where they have no weapons or defence from nature and reason, fear and hope, though unfounded and delusive, are the only ex- pedients left. By representing the terrors of their law in the most horrid colours, the wretched victim of their designs cries out in the depth of despair, " Lorcl^ what shall I do to be saved V The work is then in a certain way of success ; the convert gives himself up to the direction of the church in all things, and is ever after the passive tool of its power. These converts are seldom or never made by pure reason and sound argument, for these would never answer the purpose ; but the passions, which may be driven by every gale tliat l>Iows, the fickle and inconstant passions, are so influenced by the power of false elocjuence in violent c 12 THOUGFITS ON THE declamations and vehement harangues, that the calm, even voice of reason is not heard, or is disregarded, amidst the bustle of jarring emotions ; and the poor frightened wretch catches hold of the first object that is held out to save him from his fancied perishing and undone condition. Without ever once considering whether the profession they embrace is founded in nature and reason, they confide wholly in the piety of their spiritual teacher, leave their faith and hope alto- gether in his hands, and trust entirely upon his pro- mises and power. Their belief he can alter or abolish at pleasure ; for what he preaches they must adhere to ; what he allows they must profess ; what he approves must be true. In fact the Christian system has never yet been weighed in the impartial balance of reason, or received a candid trial in the thinking world. Force, fraud, and other unfair means have always been necessarily em- ployed for its establishment. Had it been founded on truth, or consistent with common sense, its advocates would never have refused to submit it to reason, and the cool, dispassionate judgement of mankind. But they well knew that it could never stand the test, and this would be the certain means of its destruction. They therefore boldly and presumptuously tell the world, that it is beyond the reach of human reason, which is not competent to judge rightly of it. They confess that we cannot comprehend a great part of it ; but at the same time command us to believe it, though we cannot understand it. It has been the peculiarly honourable lot of Thomas Paine, the firm advocate of truth, the undaunted champion of reason, and the resolute and unconquer- able enemy of tyranny, bigotry, and prejudice, to open the door to free and impartial enquiry. He has boldly entered the field himself, and taught the world, that no true system of principles, however sacred they may be held in the public opinion, and however strongly protected and enforced by the terrors of CHRISTIAN RELIGION. 13 man*s vengeance here, and eternal punishment here- after, is too awful to be canvassed by reason, or too subhme to be comprehended by common sense. The Christian system, as it is not consistent whh reason, is declared to be above it ; and should be re- ceived even if it does not appear clear and intelligible to our human capacities. This, by prohibiting enquiry, effectually prevents detection of falsehood and confirmation of truth. The doctrine is received upon trust, upon the credit of our forefathers ; because they taught, or rather said so, we must implicitly believe so, all the remonstrances of reason and experience to the contrary notwith- standing. This is certainly a very great absurdity. For there once was a beginning to every system or theory in being; and at that beginning it was necessary to exer- cise reason as the unerrino; (ruide to direct in the choice or rejection thereof. Jf mankind were not only allowed, but necessitated to weigh every doctrine in the infallible balance of reason, at any time, why are we not entitled to the same privilege at present ? Is our reason degenerated ? Are our faculties impaired ? Or rather, are we not far more wise and enlightened than mankind were centuries ago, and much more competent to understand and judge of things than they were ? By the practice before mentioned, by that tyranny over the minds of men, which has ever been exercised in despotic states, the grossest falsehoods have been forced upon the world for realities, and the most detestable impositions established and maintained in all the strength and vigour of immutable truth. But these arts, how long soever they may prosper, and by whatever authority they may be supported ; though they may call to their aid all the powers of s)i|)< rstition and prejudices of education, and be assisted by the pride and deceit of hypocritical bigots and mercenary tyrants ; still must they finally fall, 14 THOUGHTS ON THE and sink into contemptuous oblivion. The pre- sent state of society seems peculiarly adapted to the advancement of truth, and destruction of error. The sun of reason has begun to appear, dispelling the thick and almost impenetrable mists of ignorance and superstition, illuminating the most secret recesses of the mind, and will continue to increase in splendour, till it shine forth in one clear, unclouded, and eternal day. The writings of modern philosophers have served greatly to illuminate the minds of the present genera- tion. I will here quote Pope's beautiful description of that sublime and heavenly religion, which mankind in a state of nature professed, contrasted with that dis- torted, gloomy religion which has been imposed on mankind by power and fraud. " Man, like his Maker, saw that all was righty To virtue, in the paths of pleasure, trod, And own'd a father when he own'd a God. Love all the faith, and all th' allegiance tiien ; . For Nature knew no right divine in men, Nor ill could/ear in God ; and understood A sov'reign being but a sov'reign good.^' * » * . « « * * *' Superstition taught the tyrant awe, Then shared the tyranny, then lent it aid, And Gods of conq'rors, slaves of subjects made : AV<^, 'midst the lightning's blaze and thunder's sound, "When rock'd the mountains, and when groan'd the ground, S/ie taught the weak to bend, the proud to pray. To power unseen, and mightier far than they : She, from the rending earth and bursting skies. Saw Gods descend and fiends infernal rise : Here fix'd the dreadful, there the blest abodes ; J^ear made her devils, and weak hope her gods ; Gods partial, changeful, passionate, nnjust. Whose attributes were rage, revenge, or lust ; Such as the souls of cowards might conceive, And form'd like tyrants, tyrants would believe. Zeal, then, not charity, became the guide. And hell was built on spite, and heaven on pride. Then sacred seem'd lli' ethereal vault no more ; Altars grew marble then^ and rcek'd with gore: CHRISTIAN RELUaON. 15 Tlieu first the Flamen tasted living food ; Next his grim idol sniear'd with human blood ; "NVith heaven's own thunders shook the world below j And play'd the god an engine on his foe." From an attentive perusal of such liberal, enlightened writers as Pope, Locke, Hume, &c. who were not interested in forcing any unnatural systems upon man- kind, whose only aim was the happiness of the human race, and from my own reflections, 1 have adopted the following creeds which 1 here submit to the impar- tial consideration of my fellow citizens of all denomi- nations. 1. I believe in one God, or first cause, wise, power- ful, and good ; and too far above the influence of hu- man actions to be atFected by any thing that can be done on earth. 2. I believe in the equality of men by nature (though so different by accident) the universal power of conscience, and the unerring authority of natural reason . S. I believe the whole duty of man is comprised in this one great republican principle — Do just as you would be done unto. — My reasons for believing thus arc, in the first place, that this first cause is wise and ])Ovvcrful beyond our conception, is clearly evinced in the wonderful formation and disposition of nature, exhibited in every thing that we have any perception of. 'I'hat he is good, the whole creation proves ; for we find nothing made but what is useful, beneficial, and conducive to the happiness of the whole. And that he is too far above the reach of himian actions to be affected by any thing that can be done on earth, is inferred from nature, reason, and experience: for the only idea that we can form of the Deity is, that he is a perfect, unchangeable being ; and if we sn))pose that he so particularly notices the conduct of mankind as to be differently affected by their dill'erent actions, we must allow that he is aii inij)erfect, changeable being, liable to be pleased or vexed at the mere will 16 THOUGHTS, &c. and pleasure of his creatures, and dependent upon the whim and caprice of 'tnan. In the second place, it appears from the experience of mankind in all ages, that Nature, in the creation of man, acts impartially and equally ; but leaves his talents, disposition, &c. to be regulated by mere ac- cidental circumstances. That conscience has an uni- versal power, is evident from the dislike and abhor- rence, with which all mankind look upon actions that tend to the injury of society. And not to believe in the unerring authority of natural reason, would be to accuse the Deity of injustice for not creating us capa- ble of distinguishing good from evil, and then punish- ing us for the evil we commit. In the third place, that the whole duty of man is comprised in this one great republican principle, " Do as you would be done unto,*' has appeared so notori- ous to the world in all ages, that it has been univer- sally agreed upon, as the unerring rule of action, and the basis of happiness: by the observing of which there can be neither oppression, deceit, or injustice of any kind. The duty of man is his interest ; his interest is to make himself happy ; and the surest and best way of doing this is to promote the prosperity of the whole. Finally, that system of religion which contradicts itself, cannot be wholly true. — That which is not con- sistent with reason, or agreeable to the order of nature, must be false, as ditferent from the will of the Deity, displayed in all his works : — And, that which tends to promote discord, pride, and deceit, is prejudicial to society, and ought to be discountenanced and opposed by every good man. 17 ON MIRACULOUS CONVERSIONS. It appears to be the general opinion among the karned, that all matter is, more or less, in a continual state of transmutation ; that there is a perpetual re- pulsion and attraction in nature. It is also the opi- nion of many philosophers, that the human mind is never quite stationary. That locality, early habits, examples, affections, and associations have the greatest effect in forming the characters and opinions of men, is evident to our senses ; and that after the character may be considered to be formed, a contrary course of habits, &c. of equally long or longer continuance will generally pro- duce a contrary character. Every attentive observer must perceive, that we sometimes dislike and entertain an unfavourable opi- nion of what we at another time approve and cor- dially agree to. To a cursory examiner these altera- tions may appear to take place arbitrarily ; but to one acquainted with the philosophy of the human mind, accustomed minutely to trace the different links and associations which bias our ideas, they will appear, so far from being arbitrary or supernatural, to be perfectly natural and agreeable to the wise order of things. it would seem that most parties agree to the reasons given by the learned for such alterations, &c., except they be in matters of religion ; here each party aban- dons the usual methods of philosophising, and has 18 ON MIRACULOUS CONVERSIONS. recourse to the supernatural interference of divine agency. Tiiat extraordinary instances of conversion from vice to virtue, from error to truth, sometimes take phice, for which the most profound and subtle rea- soners fail to give satisfactory causes, is most readily granted ; but still it may be said, that our not being able to trace a natural cause is no proof of there being none ; for past experience has abundantly proved to the world the folly of such kind of inferences. Many things in science and philosophy arc now even demon- strable, that formerly were, with equally good reason, considered to be miraculous or supernatural. There arc many reasons for considering the religious conversions not supernatural. There are no human criteria to determine when they are from God and when they are not. So many and so frequent imposi- tions and deceptions take place, that there is no dis- tinguishing the false from the ti'ue. These enlightenments arc equally claimed by every sect, however different in opinion. Now, supposing them to be from God, we are under the necessity of believing that there can be only one sect which can really have them ; for it would be absurd to suppose the Immutable Creator of all things would inspire his creatures to believe, as true, opposite and different doctrines ; and the confining of the divine influence to one sect only, certainly appears to be partial and arbitrary, and contrary to the saying, that *' God is no respecter of persons." People professing to be converted can never give a satisflictory explanation of their state, either to others or themselves, so as to do away all apprehension that they may not be actuated by impulse, fear, affections, &c., with a variety of other natural causes which every day make astonishing alterations in the minds of men. We sometimes meet with individuals who at one time considered themselves to be inspired, and shewed ON MlRACUi.OUS ( ONVKKSIONS. W every outward sign, and afterwards declare they con- ceive they never were. Sudden and extraordinary changes frequently take place for the worse ; but these are never accounted as supernatural. It appears that conversions most fre- (piently take place after some circumstances which naturally have a tendency to fix the attention, soften the affections, affect the passions, and subdue the will ; such as attending religious discourses, the death- bed of a friend, extreme pain, poverty, and distress, &c. Now, may not these be said to account for the first natural link } Then why should the rest of the chain be miraculous? If these observations were un- true, we might expect to find conversions occur as fre- quently among one sort of society as among another ; but that is not the case. It is observable in religious as well as in other opera- tions of the mind, that those alterations which are the most sudden and vehement, are generally more tran- sient than those which take place more gradually and after accountable associations. We might naturally expect that those divinely in- spired would be superior to the weakness of pas- sion and imperfections of nature incidental to others ; but our converts appear not to be. These supernatu- ral affections are unattended with any discernibly supernatural effects ; the possessors of them never perform miracles ! From these observations it is presumed, that there is abundant reason for apprehending that those conver- sions termed supernatural are nothing more than nature acting upon the mind of man, agreeably to those wise and immutable laws laid down by the adorable Maker of all things; and the reason of our terming them miraculous is, because we are unable with our weak faculties to trace the wonderful con- catenations, and view the infinite variety of shades of which the intellectual part of man is susceptible. At the same time it is confessed, that it being a matter of D 20 A FEW IDEAS ON RELIGION. internal feeling, and what cannot perhaps be demon- strated eitlier way, no arguments on the subject can be hoped of any material benefit, either to the person who supposes himself to have it, but cannot explain it, or to him that has it not, and cannot conceive it. Bristol, THEOPHILANTHROPIST. Feb. 18, 1819. FEW IDEAS ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION, It appears, that at least 99 persons in 100 take their religious opinions from their parents, and accord- ing to education, &c. without ever afterwards exa- mining for themselves. Now, as this belief arises from causes that are variable and quite independent of the believers, it follows, that there is no security what- ever for its being true, the chance being always against it ; consequently such persons^ opinions are of no weight in the dispute. A due attention to this consideration will, it is pre- sumed, render the number of real believers and un- believers in Christian countries much less unequal than at first we may be inclined to suppose. The evidence for (Christianity is founded on proba- bilities by a process of reasoning, not being intuitive or self-evident. The contrary of its being true can easily be conceived, and does not imply a contradiction. Owing to the different constitutions of the human mind, there always is, more or less, a certain differ- A 1 E\V SDKAs ON UEI-I(;i()N. 21 ence of oj>inioii upon all subjects in proportion to their want of self-evident proof. Then, when a sub- ject confessedly has it not, ought we to expect from it those universal results which it could only produce by having- it ? That there should be many who are not satisfied with the evidence of the Christian religion, is not to be wondered at, since it is not of that nature to pro- duce universal acquiescence. Where then can be the propriety of inveighing so bitterly against some for rejectii]g what, according to the nature of things, all cannot be expected to receive ? Assuredly, the sin of doubting must be proportional to the evidence ; then why should we attach the same punishment for disbe- lieving things that are not self-evident as we do for things that are ? With regard to the assertions, that " *tis their pride prevents their belief, that they make a Deity of their reason, and put themselves in opposition to Pleaven,'' &c. it may be seriously asked, Are these assertors sincere in what they say, or is it merely spleen ? Can they, or any one, for an instant conceive it to be pos- sible for a man in his senses, who has any idea of his Maker, or of himself, and is so deeply interested in the subject, to act in such a way } There may be some reason for considering that doc- trine to be false which might cause us to think exist- ence a curse, rather than a blessing, and to entertain views inconsistent with the Divine Nature. If the orthodox opinions be correct, how few among professors really jirofess! flow small a portion of mankind profess at all ! It follows, according to even probai)ility, that the number of the saved will be ex- tremely snirdl in proportion to that which is lost. Then, when a child is born, according to the laws of chances, there are very great odds against its being saved. Query, Wlietlu'r it be a blessing to be born, to r»ni any risk at all oi endless misery, even were the 22 DEISM EXAMINED. odds the very contrary of what they appear to be, greatly in favour of everlasting bliss ? Bristol, THEOPHILANTHKOPIST. Feb. 18, 1819. DEISM EXAMINED. BY A CHUISTIAN. It has often been said, that if Christianity is not com- petent to withstand the test of reason, it ought to fall. To this opinion I willingly subscribe; and so confi- dent am 1 of our succeeding against our adversaries, the Deists, that I am for truly putting Christianity to this trial. That is, I would that there should be al- lowed a perfectly free discussion in all theological matters, that the " Age of Reason," and other works of a similar nature, should be allowed to be published. Let the enemies of our religion bring forward their objections as fast as they like ; have we not, on our part, a ready refutation for every one of them ? The Deists, 1 know, have strongly contended, thai many actions recorded in the Bible, said to have been done by the express command of God, are shocking to humanity, and in contradiction to all our ideas of moral justice. Such as putting whole nations to the sword ; sparing neither age nor infancy ; utterly de- stroying men, women, and children ; leaving not a soul to breathe, &c. &c. But does not the Bishop of DEISM EXAMINED. '23 Llandaff reconcile this seeming- incongruity, and vindi- cate the morality of the sacred writings by ex{)laining, that, as the Almighty constantly superintends all the actions of nature, and in so doing permits, or rather causes smiling: infants so to be swallowed up bv earth- (juakes, or destroyed by other natural means ; it is evident that these shockini;- transactions (as thev are called) recorded in the Bible, do not militate in the least against the character of the Deity ? The unbe- lievers certainly may bring a puerile argument against thh profound assertion of the Bishop ; but the Chris- tian who truly appreciates the real value of an unwa- vering^ai/A, will have for such argument a thorough contempt, even before he reads it. They may tell us, if they choose, that nature being actuated by general and unvarying laws, it is not to be supposed the Almighty, in order to save a human creature, will per- form a miracle. Or (to state the case more particu- larly) if a society of human beings will be so unthink- ing and imprudent, as to make their residence at the bottom of Mount Vesuvius, or Etna, that the Creator will partially suspend the laws of nature, in order that the burning lavas may not overwhelm them in destruc- tion ; or, that if mortals will be so presumptuous as to build their dwellings on the scite of former desolations, as Lisbon, for instance, that the Almighty will inter- pose, in order to prevent the recurrence of another earth(|uake ; or that (jlod will in any case partially suspend the eternal laws of the universe, in order to preserve a mortal that may be accidentally liable to be destroyed by their elfects. They may tell us all this if they choose, and likewise, that this is quite another thing, to an express command from God him- self to one set of human beings to annihilate another. — Thus we refute it all ; such arguments are built on liiunan reason, which it behoves every pious Christian to distrust ! Let them assert, that Jesus Christ himself, (if (here was such a person) has proveil the delusion he 24 DEiSM EXAMINED. laboured under, since he actually and distinctly pre- dicted, in more places than one, that his second coming would be in the days of the last surviving apostles, and that the apostles themselves sufficiently shew by their writings, that such was their opinion. Let them descant upon the description of his coming in the clouds (as related in the gospel) with the trumpets sounding before him, and call it a mere representation of human pageantry, and unworthy of being imputed to the Almighty Creator, who has millions of millions of worlds at liis command ! We thus refute the first part of this misrepresentation. Jesus, after predicting the destruction of Jerusalem, as we find it now related, speaks of his second coming, and gives a de- scription how he will appear in the clouds, with the angels sounding their trump!;ts before him, &c. &c. and then continues thus : " Verily 1 say unto you, this generation shall not pass away, till all these things be fulfilled.'* Now it is evident, that this last verse can only allude to the destruction of Jerusalem, and that the passage is misplaced by many sentences, it is true, we have no vouchers for this, nor can we perceive what motive there could have been for anv one to have made the alteration ; but as more than seventeen centuries have revolved since the death of Christ, c\\n\ no second coming yet taken place, we are fully justi- fied in maintaining the passage to be misplaci-d. The Deists accuse us of all along suppressing their works, and certainly, in this respect, 1 must acknow- ledge we have acted unfairly. I'hey say that most of the ancient productions on their side the question are lost ; while the answers to them are still extant. From this circumstance they infer, designing and supersti- tious monks and priests, in order to remove every thing out of the way that might militate against their doctrine, destroyed all the writings of their opponents, while they carefully preserved those of their own party. It is likewise affirmed, the book entitled the Age of Reason, is a more formidable enemy to Chris- DEISM EXAMINED. 25 tianity than any work ever before published, and threatens, should it l)eeome popular, to shake its flimsy fabric (for thus they speak of our religion) to its very foundation ; that the charge of blasjjhemy is brought against it to su])press it, solely from fear of this con- sequence, and that our oft-repeated assertion, " if Christianity cannot withstand the test of reason it ought to tall," is a mere mockery, for, in fact, we fully prove our intention is, never to bring our doctrine to such a tribunal. \ am very sorry that this last charge against us is not altogether unfounded. Why should not the arguments of our opponents be allowed to be published ? Their authors would very soon, I am fully persuaded, meet with a total discomfiture, and fiud our Polemics more than competent to justify their own cause. Every one knows that Mr. Paine was illiterate, that is, he only knew his own language perfectly, and had a smattering- of French. Now, have we not bishops, deacons, lecturers, curates, &c. who are acquainted with Hebrew, (jreek, Syriac, Arabic, Latin, and seve- ral other tongues, living as well as dead ; and surely, it would be strange, if, with all this various learning, aided by their laborious researches into the antiquated writings of the primitive Christians, (those credible attesters of miracles and witchciaft,) that they should not be able to overturn such a paltry antagonist as Thomas Paine; who, alas! made use of no other weapon but human reason ; who ridiculed Faith as a mere chimera ; and maintained, that a strict observance o'^ moral virtue constituted the only worship that was in reality pleasing to the Deity. Physiologists have asserted, I know, that the human brain is only capable of a certain degree of active energy, and that every additional talent we may ac(]uire must be gained at tin; expc nee of all the other powers ; and that, con- sequently, he who is familiar with a vari< tv of Ian- guages cannot possibly think very profoundly in any, the whole of his intellect being absorbed, and the pure 26 DEISM EXAMINED ideal part of it absolutely extinguished, in the compli- cated matter of grammatical construction, and the end- less labour of committing to memory the various cha- racters and innumerable quantity of words necessary for obtaining such knowledge. On the other hand, it is boldly averred, that he who knows his own lan- guage perfectly, and no otlier, may become, as it were, in his very essence, a compound of thought and re- flection, capable of drawing, from the luminous stores of his own understanding alone, arguments that shall put to flight all the scholastic quibbling of the mere Christian linguist, causing the gloom engendered by his subtilties to vanish like mist before the sun. The Deists accuse us of disturbing the last moments of the virtuous, and terrifying their imaginations with the prospect of eternal damnation. They say, that when such unfortunate persons (whose bodily weakness renders them more than childish) become overwhelmed with the dreadful picture, and give way to the weak- ness of humanity, that we then infer, they had a pro- per sense of the enormity of their guilt before they died ; and that we then exclaim, in the gloomy pom- posity of the fanatic Young, " Men may live fools, but fools they cannot die !" This quotation, when applied to the case in ques- tion, the Deists maintain to be unjust, and are for making a new reading, as being rather more appli- cable, viz. " Men may live wisely, but fools they often die !" " Shame," the Deists cry, " forbear to disturb the departing moralist with your strange dogmas ! His sole trust is in his Creator, therefore let his last hours be spent in peace ! Your interference is useless, and as it adds to the sufferings of expiring humanity, may well be termed impious and cruel. And finther, DEISM EXAMINED. •^/ what conviction can be gained from making public the imbecile and terror-extorted confessions made by the dying; for as Rousseau rightly observes, it is 'our reason that determines our belief, and when, through sickness, that faculty becomes impaired, what depend- ence can be placed on any opinion we may then adopt ?^ " All this seems at the first glance very striking and imposing, but is easily refuted. I shall confine my- self, however, to only answering the latter part of the above. I maintain, then, that even shouting our dog- mas in the ears of the dying,^ and thereby disturbing their last moments, is a mere trifle, when put in com- petition with the eternal advantages that may by this means accrue to their souls. It is well known, that Christians formerly, more generally than at present, did not scruple to compel men to become converts ; and when the heretics, as they were termed, obsti- nately held out, they actually burnt them for the love of Christ / This manner of proceeding Dr. Paley has, in some measure, justified,- by affirming, that as the salvation of tliesoul is a matter of infinitely more importance than the well-being of the body, so these converters, who actually believed salvation to exclu- sively depend on the reception of their dogmas, may be said to be in some sort excusable, for endeavouring, by all the means within their power to save a man's soul, though his body, in consequence, might be de- voted to the flames. Some, I know, would go further, and uro^e, that even the biirnino- of those who were converted by the threats of the holy fathers, was not impolitic, since it may be justified as the above prin- ciple, of preferring the welfare of the soul to that of the body. For might not a new-made convert, made so against the evidence of his own reason, recant, and thus render all the pious zeal of those soul-preservers ' Vi«!e life «f M. de Voltiurf, ' Vltle rally's Mvidrnc. > ol ( 'litij,iianitv, I'iiit lil. rhii|!. vii. 28 DEISM EXAMINED. quite abortive? Nothing more likely, and therefore to niake sure of his eternal felicity, they were equally excusabK- in committing him to the flames. A simi- lar principle influenced the pious Monk towards the unfortunate Je\\\ as related in a well-known but some- wlvdt ancient story, concluding with these lines : — " Drag, drag me out— I freeze — / diey " Your peace, my, friend, is made on high ; Full absolution here I give; Saint Peter will your soul receive : Wash'd clean from sin, and duly shriven, New converts always go to heaven ; No hour for death so fit as this; Thus, thus I launch you into bliss!" So said — the Father in a trice His convert lauiich'd beneath the ice. Hut enough of thus bringing forward accusations and objections of the Deists, and answering them my- self. Let them be brought against us in the regular way, and we will readily refute them. In fact, there will be some novelty in such an occupation to many of our divines, who have passed many years in the contiiiued sameness of preaching to congregations who are much too passive and obedient ever to dis- sent a single syllable from the doctrine laid down, it is now several years since our Doctors of Divinity really exerted their talents, viz. ever since the first publica- tion of the Age of Reason. 1 think it downright inconsistency for our authorities to prosecute those who publish works of this kind, seeing those works absolutely benefit Christianity. For did not the above production give rise to innumerable answers, each of which was sufficient in itself to prove the divine ori- gin and infallibility of the sacred Scriptures ? Read Bishop Watson's Apology for the Bible, for instance, a work replete with genius ; a work which will confer lasting honour on its reverend author ; and wherein we cannot i)(>rc<'ive the La^f traces of what our adversaries ti'im priestcraft, and not a single sentence which may DEISM EXAMINED. 29 be called a quibble. Another answer to the Age of Reason, by a wit, named ilobert Thompson, also de- serves to be mad(> honourable mention ot", as biing i\Q\\.\\er scurrilous nor co/itcniplible ; as does likewise an answer, by a layman of the name of Padman, a work of vast profundity^ and in which there is not to be found any peroersion or })iliful misrepresentation of passages in Mr. Paine's book. Should these two last gentlemen be still in existence, and chance to pe- ruse this, they will be extremely grateful^ I am sur(% for my thus noticing them ; but they may reserve all thanks, for the encomiums I have passed upon them are nothing more than their real deserts.^ But to con- clude. Seeing, I say, that deistical works are benefi- cial to our holy and only true religion, by making its ministers exert their talents, let them be printed and freely circulated, and in so doing we shall no longer lay under the vile odium of being oppressors and per- secutors for righteousness sake. A Jirm Believer in the only true God^ and a future State of Retribution. Loudun, Jan. 30, 1819. ' There is also a Mr. S. Thompson, a member of the ^ect called ♦' Free Thinkiuj^ Christians," who in a work entitled " Evidences of Revealed Reli<^ion on a new Plan^'' has attempted to answer some of the objections of Mr. Faine ; but as his arguments, though said to be quite inconclusive, have too much the appearance of hmnnn reason, I have not thought proper to mention Am as a person who has much benefited our cause ; and especiallj' as I understand that •' implicit faith" forms no part of the creed of the above sect. THE END, LETTER TO SIR SAMUEL SHEPHERD, KNT. 1^10 Mm^Wn aitornep^Oeneral, UPON THE SUBJECT OF HIS PROSECUTIONS or RICHARD CARLILE, FOR PUBLISHING PAINE'S AGE OF REASON. .MM^lMMi^iAi^MMAAM PRINTED AND PUBLISHED BY R. CARLILE, 55, FLEET STREET. 1819. LETTER, ^•c. ^c. Sir, As you have commenced the prosecution of Carhle, a printer, tor pubhshing an edition of Paine's Age of Reason, in conjunction with the self- styled Society tor the Suppression of Vice, 1 take the h}3erty to submit to your consideration a' ftew remarks, upon the nature and tendency of this purposed sUit. Since prosecutions of tliis kind are not 4iovel, and as it u^ay be fairly conjectured that you will follow the ordinary routine of men in your otfice in tliese causes, and moreover as the accused will be subjected to the usual disadvantage of meeting three pleadings to the one vvhicli will be allowed him, besides the probable interruptions I'rom the Judge on the bench, I think it needful and reasonable to anticipate and meet before- hand those hackmed argmiieiHs, which it seems to me most probable that you will advance in the court on the (lays of trial. That the accuser should be permitted to plead three times to the once with wliich the accused is but imper- fectly indidged, thouiih it may be law, is most flagrant injustice. But, jjeriiaps, you may not be (juite satis- fied with my arithmetic, and may ask me, how I make out my three pleadings to one. It were much to the honour of this country, and its laws, if 1 should be mistak' n in n)y ealcnhnion, but ! fear to be j)ut to the 4 A LETTER TO blush as an Englishman, (if you serjtants at law are not,) by my computation, being found to be but too true. In the first place, you open the case. This you do not reckon pleading : but as you are allowed to say whatever you think proper, it becomes as truly a plead- ing in reality as your latter speech, which alone you call by that name. The second is what is styled so on both sides. And this would be injustice, if 1 stopped here ; but having engaged to reckon up three pleadings, 1 fix upon the most unfit person that could be named ; that is, my Lord Judge, to plead on the third occasion. This speecii of the Judge, you crown-lawyers term summing up the evidence; but I believe you can never adduce one solitary instance in a crown prosecution, in which the Judge has not aca-d completely the part of a retained couitsel tor the crown. That my l^ord Judge should be unable to divest himself of the habit of pleading as an advocate, since he has formerly followed that employment, though far from equitable or decorous, is still very natural, like as the mail-coach horse, which has aforetime been a hunter, " When bounds and horns tlie torest rend," pricks u)) his i^ars, and lonys to join in the piusiiit. But the Judge also discharges a still more exception- able office, that of interrupter on the part of the crown. He is apt to lug in his observation, that what th(^ ac- cused is savino- in his own defence is irreleuant to the question ; though a man's penetration must be asto- nishing who can determine beforehand that any parti- cular sentence uttered shall not, by a concatenation of argument, be brought to bear forcibly upon the point in question. If the accused adduces instances of opposite deci- SIR SAMUEL SHEPIIEUD, KNT. 5- sions in similar preceeding suits, with a view to point out an inconsistency, the Judge will exclaim, " That is not the cause before us ;" though how in the world can inconsistency be shewn without bringing forward more than one particular ? These ill-timed interruptions, by breaking the thread of connection of the defence of the accused, must so maul it, and put it out of shape, that the jury become unable to make either head or tail of it, even though it should have been previously drawn up with good judgment, and contain the soundest reasonings. In trials for the alledged blasphemy, if the accused complains that a garbled extract made from his book does not convey its true sense, and wishes to read it at large, the court object, and cry out, that the book is too bad to be read in that place, and that it will poison the ears of the audience. If the accused desires that the Bible may be referred to, in proof of its contradictions or blameable pas- sages, the court bawls aloud that it is loo good a book to be produced before the profane. If reference be thus objected to, by what means, then, shall the truth be brought to light ? And now, Mr. Attorney-General, let us proceed to your own probable allegations and arguments in court in this particular cause ; and I will suppose you to say to the gentlemen of the jury, that you have been urged by the rej)resentations of a respectable body of men, the Society for the Suppression Vice, to pro- secute R. Carlile, whom you have discovered and proved before the court to have gone vi et armis^ by violence and with weapons of war, and not having the fear of God before his eyes, to have published a blasphemous libel, the A^e: of Reason, by Thomas Paine, which libel had been previously condemned by a Jury, and burnt by the common hangman. That the wicked tendency of this libel was to induce a ge- neral disbelief of your and their most holy religion, that pure, pacific, and benevolent system, which, B 6 A LETTER TO having emanated from the Deity, is, to its adherents, the basis of their comforts in this life, their solace in the hours of affliction, sickness, and death, their moral instruction in this world, and their providitor of everlasting happiness in a world to come ; that libels of this impious description were with a malignant zeal thrown in the way of the young and inexperienced, too undiscerning to detect their sophistry, or suspect the poison contained in them, and too ignorant yet of the world to be on their guard against the practices of bad men : that irreligion and immorality are necessa- rily connected ; and that the propagators of infidelity are actuated by a malice too virulent to be attributed to mere human passion, and for which a motive and stimulus would be in vain sought for, unless it be assigned to the instigators of the great enemy of mankind, the Devil. The jury will be conjured, as they value the preservation of good morals, the peace and good order of society, both individual and public welfare, the happiness of their fellow-subjects both in this world and in a future life, to arrest the fatal poison in its progress, and give a verdict of conviction and condemnation against the accused. But, Mr. Attorney General, you would not take shining pinchbeck counters instead of sovereigns for a fee, with as little close examination as you will wish the jury to admit the weight and validity of your ar- guments, and the accuracy of your assertions. The imposing name assumed by the Society who are the ostensible movers of the prosecution, might, at the first glance, seem sufficient to carry all before it, and to dispatch the business at one blow. For what could such a Society direct their efforts against but vice ? However, men are not to be judged of by the titles they choose to give to themselves, without some scrutiny being made into their conduct. This self- styled Society for the Suppression of V^ice., exhibit themselves to us as the foes to free inquiry, and stifling the arguments on one side of a (|uestion. In vain sill SAMlIEf. SHEPiiLUD, KNT. 7 will tliey excuse themselves as preventing the poison- ous effects of reasonings on the wrong side ; tor to de- cide in that way which side is wrong is a j)etiho pro- positi, a begging of the question. Heal truth is hest established by the free production of the arguments on both sides ; for thereby suspicion of unfairness is re- moved. So many absurdities attend upon error and flilsehood, that truth has a very preponderating advan- tage against them, where enquiry is left free. The arguments then adduced on the wrong side of a ques- tion, are not so noxious and poisonous as disingenuous \ men wish to insinuate. The truth abhors to be in- debted to suppression of argument, from that it never can derive advantage ; therefore it is only resorted to by the party who are in the wrong. This endeavour to suppress argument implies disingenuousness, and this last named quality is always at variance with real truth. Error may be desioned, but disingenuousness never can be ; and therefore when accompanied with violence, it is always criminal. Disingenuousness, as far as it extends, cannot consist with the love of trudi, but error may. Now as the love of truth is the basis of all real morality, this disingenuous self-styled So- ciety for the Sup|)ression of Vice, are, therefore, detected to be a Society for the Suppression of Virtue. I will still suppose you to proceed in the beaten track of your predecessors in office, and omitting to reply to the technicality /;« ct armis, on which, 1 ima- gine, you lay no stress, I take the liberty to question the propriety of the accustomed phrase, "not having the fear of God before his eyes." You will admit, Mr. Attorney-General, that to forge the Great Seal of England would be a criminal deception, and also, that to examine whether it was forged or not, or to state reasons for believing it to have been forged, woukl be allowable. Now, as the authority of the Creator is a higher one than the British (Government, so to forge a nivelation from him would be a more criminal impos- ture than the former one ; and a rigid examination and 8 A I.KT'IER TO scrutiny into its truth or falsehood, raid -all doubts and rational exceptions against a supposed revelation, would always be innocenl, and might sometimes be laudable. Therefore, as Paine's Age of Reason is an objectiou against the truth of the supposed revelations of Moses and Jesus, the conduct of R. Carlile in pub- lishing it must be innocent, at least, if not meritorious, and therefore would consist well with a pious venera- tion towards the Supreme Being; and this invalidates your assertion. " Which libel had been condemned by the legisla- ture.'^ But as the legislature is composed of fallible men, their sanction does not prove the truth and validity of Jesus's pretensions ; and as the conduct of the legislature in sanctionino^ this revelation might be directed and influenced by political motives, their sanction is an argument rather against than in favour of its truth. " And burnt by the common hangman." Jean Jaques Rousseau says, and so must every reasonable man, Brider un livre n'esf pas y repondre, " Burning a book is not answerinar it." " The wicked tendency of this libel was to mduce a general disbelief of your and their most holy reli- gion.^' The truth can only be ascertained by leaving- inquiry free, that arguments on both sides of a ques- tion may be brought forward, in order that it may be seen on which side the preponderance lies. There- fore, the same objection would hold good against pro- ducing the arguments on the wrong side of any other question, as well as this before us now ; this would militate against truth in general, and is, of course, ab- surd. Besides, as the Deists have made the offer to argue with Jesus*s followers upon the truth or false- . hood of Jesus's pretensions upon fair and equal terms, which offer Jesus's followers have thought proper to decline, therefore, to use a figure borrowed from pugi- listic combats, the Deists throw up the hat and claim the victory. SIR SAMUEL SHEPHERD, KNT. 9 " That pure, pacific, and benevolent system, which havino- emanated from the Deitv." But the Deists ofter to bring arguments to disprove the jiurity, peace- ableness, and benevolence of Jesus's system, and like- wise its origin from the Supreme Being ; and your laws hinder those arguments from appearing. Now, this endeavour of yours to suppress is concealment. And if there is nothing criminal in this system of Jesus, what could vou liave to conceal ? The Deists do not endeavour to conceal any thing, it is the hiding, hushing, concealing party which are the guilty ; where morality is concerned concealment implies guilt. If the Deists venture to biing forward demonstrations from the four Gospels against the personal moral cha- racter of Jesus, you call that blasphemy. But recol- lect, that when the Deists make you the offer to dis- cuss the moral character and the pretension of Jesus to a mission from the Almighty upon honourable and fair terms, and you choose to decline this equitable proposal, the charge of blasphemy falls upon your- selves ; your sneaking evasion and concealment cause the charge of blasphemy to be brought home against you, and you stand convicted yourselves as the blasphemers. " Is to its adherents the basis of their comforts in this life." Observe, that those very men who lay heavy taxation upon this country, and, what was un- known to Pagan times, entail those taxes upon unborn children, those men are among the most zealous as- serters of Jesus's pretensions, and employ Jesus's priests as diligent advocates for the imposition of pub- lic burdens on the land, and sundry abuses. So that the bulk of the people of this country are not much indebted to Jesus's system for temporal comforts. Nay, it rather deprives them of many comforts, and even necessaries in this life. We have such men at present in office, of greatest power and trust, who are of such principles that they would countenance and patronize no religion but what suited their purpose, and 10 A LETTEK TQ promoted their tyranny and oppressive objects and de- signs. Therefore, we may see what Jesus's rehgion is by its suiting them so well. " Their solace in the hours of affliction, sickness, and death." Jesus's religion has caused the affliction and death of far more people than it has solaced on such occasions. " Their moral instructor in this world." The real moral tendency of Jesus's system is one of the points at issue between his followers and the Deists ; there- fore that position is not to be assumed as it has not been fairly proved. Fhe effect of Jesus's religion may have been to repress some vices in the world, but it has greatly increased others. When the Pagan Romans possessed Britain, there was not as much gin, brandy and whiskey drank here as there is now. Nay, the Pagan Romans used to mix water with their wine most usually. Unpaid Bank notes were un- known to them ; and thus millions of inhabitants were not employed in circulating among themselves false- hood and fraud, which horrid practice among us ren- ders those two last crimes familiar to the view, and abates the abhorrence of them. Indeed, perjury was evidently not near so frequent among the Pagan Romans as it is now that Jesus's system has prevailed ; this fact we can clearly infer from what remains to us of Greek and Roman writers. The unnatural tax on unborn children was totally unknown to those ancients : so that Jesus's morality has not done us much good. " And their providitor of everlasting happiness in a world to come." There are some drawbacks in this world, at any rate, if we reckon the Sunday's weekly gloom, and the tythes on all landed property. Whe- ther this future happiness be attained to at last or not by Jesus's followers, it is a long, a very melancholy road, however, that they go it. And as a tenth levied on all landed produce and other church dues are pretty large payment in advance for an inheritance in an unseen country, which no man living has visited, SIR SAMUEL SHEPHERD, KNT. 11 it seems unreasonable for the law to hinder a scrutiny and examination into the validity of the title-deeds. Besides, as the land is rated heavier than other pro- perty, the payment falls very unequally on the holders of shares in this Terra Incoonita. " Libels of this impious description are zealously thrown in the way of the young and inexperienced.'^ This practising upon the minds of the young and in- experienced, if it be culpable, is not so chargeable upon the Deists as upon Jesus's priests. The deisti- cal writings are argumentative, and therefore cannot be read by the young till they are almost grown up, and the judgment is always appealed to by the Deists ; neither do they discourage the examination of the other side of the question, as Jesus's followers usually do. On the other hand, Jesus's priests burden the memory of children, not sev^en years old, with creeds and catechisms; besides, they labour to prejudice the young in favour of Jesus's system, and to discourage all fair inquiry into what concerns its truth; aeon- duct which the Deists would abhor to pursue in favour of deism. Moreover, the catechisms and other ma- chinations of Jesus's priests are calculated to impair the discerning faculty of the young, and to blunt its acumen. Let us examine the beginning of the church of Eng- land catechism as an example. " Q. Who gave you that name.''" — "A. My godfathers and godmothers in my baptism, wherein 1 was made a member of Christ,'' &c. How should a child at seven years comprehend the meaning of a membership with an unseen meta- physical being ? 'I his beginning with children on sub- jects beyond their comprehension is playing tricks with their understanding. '• Q. What did your godfathers, &c. then for you .^" — " A. They did i)romise and vow three things in my name : first, that I should renounce the devil and all his works.'' it is a monstrous proposition to in.stil into a child's mind that one person could swear 12 A LETTER 10 to the certainty of another's conduct. Surely these priestly tricks must be meant to incapacitate these young children throughout life from ever thinking acutely on religious subjects. And what idea could a child have of the devil's works ? Of the devil himself they might form some notion from the picture of him, and might " Dream of the devil, and wake in a fright." The processions \_i. e. pomps] and empty things of this wicked world. Would any pious man swear that a child should not be fond of processions, pomps, and splendid sliows ? Neither could a child distinguish empty things or vanities of the world. It is unavail- ing for Jesus's priests to say that at any age of matu- rity these distinctions will be comprehended, for they have taken care before hand, as far as they could, to injure and debilitate the discerning facidty : and if they should afterwards distinguish vanities, they would still be less able to examine religious truths ; and to place impediments in the way of this last, is the priest's object. " Secondly, that I should believe all the articles of tlie Christian faith." How can one person swear, to what another shall believe ? and what a notion this swearing must give to young rninds of the reverence due to an oath ! Descant, Mr. Attorney-General, as you think proper upon, the good moral tendency of the rehgion as by law established, but you will find it very difficult to prove your asser- tions in its favour, whenever you may please to advance them. The oath extends so far as that the child shall believe not one article only, but all the articles of Jesus's religion, and that without even comprehend- ing them all, for some, as that of the Trinity, are quite unintelligible ; and some of these articles contain other articles, so as to embrace the whole volume of the Bible, all and singular every passage of it, " And thirdly, that I should keep God's holy will SIR SilMUEL SHEPHERD, KNT. 13 and commandments.'' Then they must swear that the boy shall never be a godfiither. All this is done to impair the intellect, and accounts, in part, for the extreme obstinacy and prejudice of Jesus's followers. Somebody must have sworn, IMr. Attorney-General, that you should never be an Attor- ney-General ; for this exercise of your office herein described, is not compatible with much scrupulosity. As for its beinj said that the child afterwards takes the oath upon itself, oaths cannot be so transferred ; there- fore that plea is futile. No description of people, besides Jesus's followers, ever admitted the execrable principle of the transfer of an oath. In fact, if the godfathers had sworn that the boy should turn out a pickle, after all the rest of priestly management, they would have stood a pretty good chance of having nothing fall upon their conscience from that quarter. Jesus's priests are apt to injure the intellect of young people by telling them, that if they do not believe Jesus's religion they will be damned to eternal punishments. Now as in all natural belief, when the intellect is sound and healthy, the mind is always passive in the act of giving its assent to any proposi- tion, this trick of Jesus's priests disturbs, impairs, and disorders the understanding ; and by this means also people are rendered incapable, throughout life, to reason and inquire with penetration, discernment, and impartiality on religious subjects. The natural belief of a sound mind is not determined by the will. If men could, in all cases, believe whatever they pleased, their minds would be a complete chaos ; yet have Jesus's priests, in all ages since the days of the founder of their religion, offered this violence to the human intellect. Thus, I think, that I have shewn you, Mr. Attorney-General, that the young and inexpe- rienced are not more in danG:er of imbibino- absurd notions and depraved principles from the Deists than from Jesus's priests. c 14 A LETTER TO I now proceed to examine a supposed assertion, rife enough among those of your side of the question, that " infidehty and immorahty are necessarily con- nected.'' That the Deists and other unbehvers are more immoral than Jesus's followers, is more than can be proved. And when we consider that Jesus's reli- gion is always taken up as a prejudice, and is main- tained in the world by violence, and by a pertina- cious determination of Jesus's adherents to hear the reason only on one side of the question, that side which is favourable to his pretensions, a procedure which is utterly repugnant to the love of truth, the most probable conjecture is, that the unbelivers should be, upon the whole, the more moral party. But it must be allowed to be a difficult matter to deter- mine such a question as that to anything like certainty. Until it, be determined, however, you have no right to make the assertion alluded to. When you declaim upon the too great prevalence of infidelity, you speak a language which implies the in- sane and monstrous notion that natural belief is depen- dent upon the will ; whereas it is the known and sug- gested reasons which always naturally determine the assent. A man is no more culpable merely for what he believes, than he is for discovering by the taste that sugar is sweet and aloes bitter. Your slang when you speak of infidelity and belief, as virtues or vices, reprehensible or laudable, would be quite unin- telligible to us, if we were not already acquainted with the tricks and machinations of priests to create preju- dice, or frighten people into an assent to points, which they dare not trust and submit to the test of fair inquiry. If the Creator were to require an assent without a sufficient reason to determine it, he would demand what is contrary to the structure of the human mind, which was formed by himself: thus he would disorder his own work, which is a thing incredible. If he has suggested reasons which would not have been SIR SAMUEL SHEPHERD, KNT. 15 Otherwise thought of, let Jesns's priests produce them, and let them be examined. Then the prosecutions of Deists would be superfluous, for they would be forced to beheve when the reasons were found co2:entenou2:ii. But no such reasons have been hitherto produced : reason or no reason, the assent is still required. And how shall such an assent without reasons sufficient be chstinguished from what is universally allowed, by physicians and all others, to be insanity and mental derangement ? " That the propagators of infidelity are instigated by the Devil." This assertion, very usual from men in your office, Mr. Attorney-General, you are unable to prove. And hereby you remind us, that Jesus's followers universally admit the very absurd notion of two principles in the universe, a good and a bad one. I know that the moderns beinsr ashamed of it, wish to abrogate it, and throw it off from themselves upon the early heretics. But we shall not allow you to escape that way. If you advance any principle, you must admit all the consequences which necessarily flow from it ; and we will not suffer your evasions in this particular. When pressed hard, you followers of Jesus want to pass off the Devil upon us for a mere angel, and tell us of his war in Heaven, and that he was cast out upon the earth. This will not do, we shall not allow you this subterfuge, for in other places your received canon of Scripture maintains the ubi- quity of the Devil ; this extravagant notion with which we charge you, we shall bring home to you. In 2 Cor. chap. iv. ver. 4, you have, " In whom the God of this M'orld hath blinded the eyes of them that believe not ;" implying, that the Devil, i.e. the (iod of this world, is ])resent in all unbelievers. This is still further confirmed by 1 John, chap, v, ver. 19: " The whole world lieth in the wicked one," i. e. the Devil. 1 know that it is translated, "lieth in wicked- ness ;'' but this a sn(niking evasion of Jesus's fol- lowers, who are ashamed of the notion of the two 16 A LETTER TO principles. That is an extraordinary vicious transla- tion of the passage. A man who knows the least of Greek at all must be sensible that the passage will only admit of the rendering which I have here, and others have before me, given to it. The Devil is said by Jesus's followers to pervade the whole unbelieving •world. If you complain, Mr. Attorney-General, that this is pressing a lawyer too far on a theological ques- tion, I shall lay the blame on you, and those who have held your office, for starting this particular sub- ject ; and whenever an Attorney-General advances a position, he takes the risks attending it. The story of the Devil's fall from Heaven in Revelations, chap. xii. may establish and shew an inconsistency in Jesus's religion, but it does not get you nor his followers clear of the silly notion of the two principles, when your canon of Scripture has once advanced what clearly im- plies that groundless notion. " The jury are conjured.'' Since the detection and exposition of that infamous list of jurors, out of which a jury used to be packed for the Crown when- ever it was prosecutor, some sort of reformation has taken place in the manner of appointing a jury, so as to leave a better chance of having disinterested men on the jury. Before Hone's trial, the scene which used to take place in prosecutions for alledged blas- phemy was scandalous and detestable. The legisla- ture take upon themselves to assign a revelation to the Almighty, but as a revelation is a delineation of his character, they assign to him a character of their own choosing; and as they labour to suppress and hide the objections started against it, that character which they have given to the Supreme Being must of course be a bad one, because concealment in this case implies guilt in the concealing party : so that the charge of blasphemy is justly retorted upon the legislature and upon the prosecuting party in this case of R. Carlile, and also in the preceding cases of Houston, the re- puted author of Kcce Homo, of Williams, who was SIR SAMUEL SHEPHERD, KNT. 17 Paine's printer of the Age of Reason, of Daniel Isaac Eaton, too, and others. The legislative bodies, I re- peat, and their accompHces, are the real blaspheming party, who have given, as they testify by their con- cealing practices, a bad and slanderous character to the Almighty, and whose guilt is aggravated by their endeavours to hinder other men from vindicating him from their foul aspersions. The jury on ail those above mentioned occasions in- variably gave up the character of the Maker of the universe to be traduced and calumniated by the legis- lative bodies and their accomplices ; and this abandon- ment of all rectitude and decency was by bad men termed a verdict, i.e. a vere dictum^ whereby infallibi- lity was attributed to twelve mortal men at the same time that it was denied to the Ancient of Days, the real pro- prietor of all worlds. If persons sitting judiciously upon the character of this exalted 13eing, gave it up thus to be reviled, they ought, at least, to have been Gods whose judgment was to have been thus appealed to: in fact, this sort of appeal of the prosecuting party to twelve mortals, was erectino^ them to sometliing: far above the human nature ; and these twelve mortals were induced by a gratuity of one or more guineas a piece, a good dinner, with plenty of jovial nectar, at the expence of the country, to consign over the cha- racter of the Almighty to reviling and insult, thereby opening a door for a supposititious system of morality, " And raised to gods confess even virtue vain." Pope. " As they value the preservation of good morals." This, as 1 have shewn, must be merely ironical, these prosecutions having the opposite tendency. " The peace and good order of society.^' This is to obtain a submission to tyranny; which submission Jesus in his religion inculciites by his Ai)Ostle Peter, 1 K])h. chiip. ii. ver. l;j: " Submit yourselves to every 18 A LETTER TO ordinance of man.'* And this will account for zeal of the ruling authorities to support Jesus's pretensions. " Individual and public welfare." This, after what has been shewn, must be all rant. " The happiness of their fellow-subjects here and hereafter.'* This can never be promoted by suppress- ing- argument and stifling inquiry. " Arrest the fatal poison.'* Here the fair and free investigation and examination of propositions is called poison. Yet, who but the wicked can have any thing to dread from inquiry ? I apprehend, Mr. Shepherd, that you and the self- styled Society for the Suppression of Vice carry on separate prosecutions, but I have classed you both to- gether, because you are both of you aiding, abetting, and assisting in the same design. Of what individu- als that Society is composed is not known to me, but as the Bishops of Durham and Rochester are the pre- sidents, I conclude, that many priests of Jesus are among the number, and that, at any rate, the parsons are the chief instructors in this business. That free inquiry should not generally take place is much their in- terest, for thereby their " gains would be gone.*' They would much wish that the ignorance of ancient days, so profitable to parsons, could be brought back ; and I send you a verse or two upon a desire expressed in the Gentleman's, or as it ought to be called, from its treat- ing so much of ecclesiastical matters, and expressing the wish of the parsons, the Parson's Magazine, that the level near St. Andrew's church should be filled up. *' Priests, who tlirou^h flats their trade sustain. Wish level Holborn Hill ; And wish the world were flat ygain. As erst when it stood still.'" The self-styled Society for the Suppression of Vice, are zealous to substitute useless or absurd observances ' Jobhu;!, chap. x. SIR SAMUEL SHEPHERD, KNT. 19 as parts of religion, instead of real true morality; and iiave taken great j)ains to prevent amusements, and produce a gloom throughout Sunday", the only holiday for many people. There are not less spirits drank on account of a sabbatical gloom ; for harmless cheer- fulness is rather a preservative of innocence. I have therefore sent you, Mr. Attorney-General, a song, which I beg you to deliver to the parsons of that Society, and to any other parsons, to help them to keep up their spirits. SONG, To the tune of " Come, bustle, bustle, drink aboulf and let us merry be,'''' of George Alexander Stevens, Since Paul affirms that Heaven has chose The thouj^htless, foolish things,' And bless'd with Paradise all those For paying: priests and kings :* Then a preaching we will go, will go, will go. Then a preaching we will go. Fanatic herds, as if with strings At their nose, by priests are led ; And know not that the knavish things Made that choice in God's stead. Then a preaching, &c. As crowds believe the heavens reject The prying, shrewd, and wise, No fear lest he our fraud detect, Wliose faith has closed his eyes. Then a preaching, &c. Now Sion is rubied, gilt, and pearl'd. As the seat of blockheads' bliss ; Our flocks may take that future world, Give us the joys of this. Then a preaching, &c. 1 Cor. i. ver, '27. * Rum. chap. xiii. vcr. 4. 20 A LETTER TO MR. CARLILE. Our muttons, gulled and ignorant. Dare never close inquire, Lest if they disbelieve our cant. They fall to Hell's hot fire. Then a preaching, &c. Thus dolts suck in, through panit dread, The Gospel's niilk^ and crumbs, And with all nonsense till their heads. Lest Hell should scorch their bums. Then a preaching, &c. March 2, 1819. PHILALETHES. A LETTER TO MR. CARLILE. London, 28th February, 1819. Sir, You are about to be placed in a situation, and to perform a part, which will interweave your name in the page of history: — not, however, in that species of history which records the wars, bloodshed, or misery of nations, as opposed to one another ; but in that which exhibits the cruelties of governments towards individuals among their own subjects, who seeing, or thinking they see, their fellow men suffering afflictions through the ignorance, prejudice, and misrule of their governments, endeavour to remove the causes of such oppressions and misery, by disclosing them, and setting their fellow-men to think for themselves. You have had the virtue and intrepidity to engage in this honourable career, and are, consequently, a promi- * 1 Cor. chap. iii. ver. 2, and Heb. chap. v. ver. 13. / A LETTER TO MR. CARLILE. 21 nent object in the public eye. Every friend to the progress of knowledge, reason, and truth, as well as of sincere humanity, is warmly interested in the nature and result of those severe proceedings instituted against you. They devoutly hope that your character as a man and a neighbour will afford no handle for disparagement of you and your conduct ; that your moral principles are good, and your integrity un- questioned ; that your deportment in the relations of private and domestic life is amiable : and that con- scious of the purity of your motives, you will not shrink before the threats of your adversaries ; but, on the contrary, display that manly firmness of courage which will enable you to encounter and defeat the numerical, though not formidable, superiority of force to be arrayed against you. If, however, contrary to our hopes and expectations, the abettors of persecu- tion in church and state should, by their arts and machinations, succeed in obtaining a verdict for the prosecutor, be you assured that the respect, sympa- thy, and support of every enlightened, liberal, and benevolent mind, will follow you, wherever your oppressors may convey your person. Yet I cannot but cherish anticipations of a very different termination of these proceedings, engendered as they are between religious bigotry and political folly, when submitted by both sides to a jury of our countrymen. I trust that impartial justice will guide their decision. As a friend to the universal freedom of mankind, civil and religious, I take leave to addr( ss you, for the purpose of contributing my sincere congratulations on the honours that await you, and the fine opportunity presented to you of benefiting mankind. 1 regret that the nature of my situation constrains me to con- ceal my name. To disclose it would, in all probabi- lity, prove my ruin in worldly circumstances, and thus both my present and future usi^fuJncss in this very cause be destroyed, I know many iiitlividuals, emi- nent for public and private virtue, who entertain the P 22 A LETTER TQ MR. CARLILE. same sentiments as myself, who, by the prejudices so assiduously kept up, are equally obliged to be silent. 1 have felt desirous, too, of sending you a few uncon- nected thoughts which have occurred to me on your case. It is very likely that they are quite common, and may have been much better expressed by others ; yet, nevertheless, 1 shall state them. I can easily suppose, that, even if you had an inten- tion to employ counsel in your defence, you would find some difficulty, in the present servility of the bar to the powers that be, to obtain any assistance. But you require none, and you will be your own best advocate. 1 am not a lawyer, and therefore am 1 neither deeply read in musty statutes, nor skilled in legal subtilities. I apprehend, however, that there is not a law in the statute book forbidding theological controversy. The crime with which you are charged is called a libel. Now, what a libel is 1 do not know, nor can any body tell me ; yet you are doubtless pretty well aware, that 3'our prosecutors will, in a strain of inflated declamation and bombast, describe this libel as a thing of the most atrocious and diaboli- cal nature and tendency. Your mode of defence against this attack is obvious. Since the question at issue between you and your accusers is not one of law, but of fact, your object is to get behind their ambus- cade of words, and beat down their phillippics by that irresistible weapon, common sense, wielded by an honest man. It has always appeared to my understanding that the most powerful argument that can be used with well-meaning people who assist in, or approve of prosecutions to support the ascendancy of their reli- gion, is, that which shews such prosecutions to have a directly opposite tendency. Persecution is the very scandal of religion ; it confesses weakness at once, and is a complete admission that the origin, doctrines, and progress of that religion cannot bear investigation. It proves that the professors of, and believers in it, A LETTER TO i>rR. CARLILE. 23 ane not themselves convinced ot" its truth aiul divine nature. But a svstem of thius's beino- cstabHshed, of which those persons form a part, in which they Hve, move, and have their being, thei/ icis/t it io be true. They themselves take it for granted, and live very com- fortably under that system of machinery of which it is a wheel, and so their interest and indolence combine in prompting them to wish every one else to have the same belief. There are people, however, who cannot and will not, believe what appears to their judgments to be false ; but, should they go farther than this, and conscientiously wishing their fellow-creatures to perceive the truth, endeavour to shew by writings on what grounds they cannot, and others ought not, to believe in falsehood and impositions, then, in default of coun- ter argument, or refutation by the same instrument of reason, courts of law and armed authority are called on , io compel ihosit unbelievers either to believe, (and of course such belief would be against their consciences,) or to hold their tongues. In former ages, shooting, stabbing, burning, and flaying ahve, were the means used for propagating religion for the good of men^s souls : now they are imprisoimient, fine, pillory : but these remnants of barbarity are also fast sinking into disgrace and disuse, and I cannot help thinking that you are destined to give the finishing blow, in this coun- try at least, to the cruelties of bigotry. Now, as inspiration or direct revelation from Heaven is not believed even by Christians (at least the more rational) of this day, though in the early and middle ages of Christianity priests ami monks would have sworn that God communicated with thcni every day, let me suggest that, in the course of your defence, vou ask the Jurv trvino: your iruilt or innocence as a libeller of that religion, whether thei/ believe it to be founded on truth ? And since it would be to insult them, you can add, to suppose they should i)rofess belief on a subject doubtless considered by them of the highest importance to their present and future welfare. 24 A LETTER TO MR. CARLILE. without having thoroughly examined it, again ask — whether in their hearts and consciences they think that any sophistical reasoning, which every thing con- trary to it they must deem so, could shake their prin- ciples thus established on the basis of demonstration ? If so established, what can hurt it — What can be a libel on it ? Unless their religion he capable o( demon- stration, it is at best but doubtful, and may, therefore, be at least susceptible of confutation. If, in spite of the objections and attacks to which it has been exposed, it can be shewn to be the true religion after all, such discussion, instead of doing harm, must do good, inasmuch as it fixes the religion on a firmer basis. On a subject where so many men of the most acute intellect and most respectable character diflfer in opinion, you, as a humble inquirer after truth, may be allowed to have yours. Speculative opinions on religion, you can tell the jury, are nothing : whether you be a Roman Catholic, a Protestant, a Moham- medan, a worshipper of Vishnu, a Free Thinker, or none of all these, is of no consequence to mankind either governing or governed — It is a matter between you and your Maker only. All that governments can have to do with individuals, is their conduct as mem- bers of the state towards their neighbours. Had you been charged with any acts of disturbance, with the violation of any of the laws for the protection of per- sons and property, then it would have been intelligi- ble ; you might have been a fit object for trial, and, if found guilty, of punishment. Not one of the books which you have published have the slightest tendency to promote disorder ; but, on the contrary, do they protiess, and are calculated by a diflfusion of their prin- ciples, to extend and consolidate universal peace, virtue, hapiness, and prosperity. {^, then, the gentlemen of the Jury^s religion be founded on what they have satisfied their understandings to be irut/i, nothing can injure it; since, if it really come from God, to imagine that any writings, whether A LETTER TO MR. CARLILE. 25 argumentative or satirical, could maintain a doubtful contest with books said to contain a revelation of the divine will, is actually to raise the author of such writings, and you their publisher, to a level with God himself! or, rather, to degrade that almighty, wise, and good Being, your Creator, to a level with you, the creature. Hence it follows, that persecution may destroy, but never can support any religion. You cannot have a better ground-work for your defence than the theological works of Paine, which, indeed, settle the question about the inspiration of the scriptures and the divinity of Christ. On the subject of religion generally, there is a book which every lover of truth must regret is not so well known as it will infallibly be in no long time — I allude to a work en- titled " Principles of Morality," by George Ensor, Esq. It displays the most extensive research and erudition, combined with good sense and an amiable disposition ; the subject is pursued with much per- spicuity of order, and expressed in an easy, neat, appropriate style. The book forms a very useful com- panion to Hume's ingenious and philosophical Essays on the Natural History of Religion. I have now to advert to what you will doubtless consider the most valuable part of this communication. At the period of the late Mr. Eaton's cruel and abominable treatment under the chief persecutorship of Lord Ellenborough and his high priest, vSir Vicary Gibbs, a letter appeared in the Morning Chronicle on the subject of that unfortunate gentleman's unmerited punishment. It purported to be written by one who believed in the Christian religion ; but it evinced sen- timents so liberal, reasoning so just and forcible ; it placed the right of conscience, even as good policy, in so striking a point of view ; arguing the subject in such good temper, and with such conciseness, as to appear to me a masterpiece of its kind, and a standard to which every member of the Christian church ought to be referred. 1 preserved a copy of it at the time, and 26 EXTRACT FROM THE MORNING CHRONICLE, now send you one transcribed, believing that it may be useful to you, or that it may at least be interesting to you in the perusal. The public mind has, of late years, been making rapid progress towards a true knowledge of its rights. Priestcraft and bigotry must and will be destroyed. Once trampled upon by man in the energy of his wrath, these monsters can never again rear their Gorgon heads. Like the Apollo represented by the Grecian sculptor, in the act of destroying the Pythian serpent, man will then stand as God created him, the impress of his own image, erect, free, noble, and grand. We have seen the glorious result of the attempt to crush, not Hone, but in him the spirit of a free press, and it is not permitted us to doubt that a similar triumph and reward await you. I am, Your sincere (though anonymous) friend, A FELLOW-INQUIRER AFTER TRUTH. (Copy.) To the Editor of the Morning Chronicle. Sir, I WAS one of those who saw Mr. Eaton stand in the pillory for what has been called an attempt to overturn the religion of his country. The manner in which the spectators behaved during the execution of this severe punishment, was, in my opinion, highly creditable to the liberality of the age. 1 think 1 may venture to say, there was hardly an individual present who did not sympathise with the unfortunate man ; he was cheered by numbers during the whole time of the punishment ; and many efforts were made to convey various kinds of refreshments to him. EXTRACT FROM THE MORNING CHRONICLE. 27 As one of those who wish well to the interests of the Christian religion, I own I was shocked upon this occasion. 1 have always conceived this relio-ion to he perfectly inde])endent of the arm of authority for its support, and to require only to be heard and examined to bear down every species of opposition. I cannot but consider that it has made its way against power, learning, and philosophy, united to destroy it ; nor can I refuse to draw from this the deduction, that it M'ill equally withstand all the efforts of abuse, so- phistry, and calumny. When I see any set of men resort to punishment, instead of argument, in its de- fence, I can with difficulty conceive they are serious in the belief of its doctrines, for the smallest reflection might convince them, that such a course is the most effectual method they could take to lower its estima- tion, and to cover it with discredit. It betrays that diffidence and fear for the result which a man tho- roughly impressed with the truth of the Christian doctrines would surely not be the most likely to enter- tain. I cannot bring myself, therefore, to believe, that those who manifest a zeal to crush the enemies of Christianity by the arm of the law, are themselves ac- quainted with that religion. I imagine them, on the contrary, to be men whose time and attention have been completely ingrossed by secular affairs, and who believe the Christian religion as they would believe the Mohammedan, merely because their fathers be- lieved it before them. Let those cruel persecutors reflect for a moment on the injury they are thus doing to the very cause they are pretending to support. Let them consider that religion can be defended only by argument, or by force, and that it cannot be defended by the union of both ; for it is in vain to say, it may be defended by argument, when the reasonings on one side only can be heard aloud, while those on the other draw down on the head of the user of them pillory and imprison- ment. It is certainly a very unequal conflict when 28 EXTRACT FROM THE MORNING CHRONICLE. one of the combatants may make use of an argument or a halter at his discretion. It is hke a battle be- tween a pugilist and one armed with a stiletto, which, though he may not use at first, he knows he can use if hard pushed. Such defenders of Christianity would do well to remember, that the means they are resort- ing to are those which so successfully promoted the cause of infidelity in Prance. Had the same pains been bestowed in refuting the productions of Rousseau, Diderot, and Voltaire, which were employed in burn- ing their books and punishing the authors, France and the whole of Europe might, at this day, have exhibited a very different spectacle. The progress of liberal opinion has been very rapid, indeed, of late years ; and though Judges and Attor- ney-Generals, whose daily pursuits, certainly so un- favourable to liberal and comprehensive reasonings, are generally among the last persons to shake off anti- quated prejudices, yet they too, however slowly, will, unquestionably, at last, be borne down by the tide of public opinion. THE END. ADDRESS TO THE SPANIARDS NOW IN (*?xilr in ►•©•<♦<— To you, this eighth volume of " The Republican'' is dedi- cated, as a specimen of that free DISCUSSION, the absence of which, in Spain, more than any thing else, has caused your late defeat. Every one of you must be ready to ac- knowledge, that the religious orders in your country were the most bitter enemies to your constitutional government, and that before you can hope to recover your lost posi- tion, and to retain it in tranquillity, you must so instruct the mass of the Spanish people, as to divest them of all that influence which the Priest, the Friar, and the Monk exercise over them. In your late struggle with iyrannij on the one hand and ignorance on the other, you found that, tyranny rather than liberty can best influence ignorance, and use it for any and for all its purposes. A little gold and a few high somiding words rouse the passions of the ignorant, and they may be led on to their own and to the destruction of others, like a dog or any other beast of prey. There is no remedy for this, but in equalizing the knowledge of mankind: there is no means to that end, but the most^ree discussion. It behoves you then, whilst in exile, to examine the foundation of the Christian, and of every other religion, that you may be prepared with the means to shake the power of the Spanish Priesthood, and to rescue the ignorant of your country from its direful influence. Know from this volume that the Christian Religion has no good foundation — that it is not useful, but that it is mischievous, of which Spain is a melancholy instance. Who were they to raise a shout, when Riego ceased to live? — The Priests. Who were they to foment the insurrection against the Constitution, and to call in the aid of the French slaves? The Priests, with your hateful Ferdinand at their head. Have you not found many of these pretended preachers of peace in arms against you? And those, who have not re- sorted to arms, have they not abetted the ignorant and weak minded peasantry to that object? Depend on it, that such a code as your Constitution can never exist, long at a time, with an established priesthood. DEDICATION. In vain, did you make it death by your code to introduce any but the Roman Catholic Religion into Spain! Your Priests did not want the religion, but the influence and pro- fit arising therefrom. You were heretics, the moment you began to apply the church-property to the national wants. All your professions of respect for the Roman Catholic Re- ligion availed you nothing: you were denounced as Atheists, and justly so deuouncd; for you ought to have known, that the Priest knows no God but his profit and power, of which you sought to deprive him. His private gospel is his rent and tithe roll, which you did not respect; and be properly proclaimed you to be heretics. If you can again set your feet on the Spanish soil, you are intreated to think of nothing before the annihilation of priestcraft. The lands and dwellings of the Priests you should share among those who are likely to be made instru- ments for your overthrow ; by so doing, you will secure their support, whilst the bumbled priest will crouch to your influence. Your next revolution in Spain must end in an avowed Republic; for you have had experience, that Monarchy and Freedom are words and principles not to be associated. A constitutional monarchy is a system that is at war with itself: it contains the germ of civil war, which will inces- santly be bursting forth, until monarchy ox freedom triumphs. Adversity is the best school in which to acquire know- ledge; in that school you are now placed ; and it is hoped, that the discussions carrying on by the Press of this Island will not be lost upon you. Your attention is particularly called to the first number of this volume, in which you may learn, that you erred in making your constitution, verbose as it was, a fixture for a period of years. You will there see that all a people can possibly want in the way of Go- vernment is, wholesome laws and wholesome magistrates; and that, it is the height of absurdity to say, that the one or the other shall be placed above a periodical election and not be changed for a number of years. Such an error in your con- stitution appears to me, to have been a main cause of its speedy overthrow. The fate of Riego may teach you the impropriety of having made a truce with monarchy, and widi such a monarch as Ferdi- nand. It may show you the hollowness of such expedients as force from llie mouth of such a man sentiments at variance with those which all tlie ]>eople of Europe and America knew him to entertain. It may show you that nothing which has its basis in deception can work for the benefit of a people, and that morality 4 DEDICATION. is as essential to the well working of a Government, as to the happiness of an individual. The monarchical part of your con- stitution was deception throughout, and a baser mind than Ferdi- nand's, if such could have been found, might have spurned the idea of being its instrument. The political part of this volume clearly shews you, that mo- narchy, upon its past and present construction, cannot be mixed up wiih popular liberty: it clearly shews you, that it is not neces- sary to Government; but that it is an obstruction to good Go- vernment; it clearly shews you that a people, insurgent against bad Government, should never respect it in any part of its existence ; but that they should look upon themselves, as a society about to begin a new association, and calculate on what is best for the future, instead of adhering to the form of what is past. Laws and ministers of law are all that is wanted to perfect the happi- ness of an intelligent people, provided that those laws and their ministers are the offspring of popular representation. The theological part of this volume exhibits, in my opinion, most clearly, that there is no supernatural power, no designing, power beyond the animal world, and that the almighty power, or the combined powers of the universe, are not intellectual. An un derstanding of this matter strikes at the root of all religion, by shewing you, that all is idolatry: that there can be no such thing as religion separable from idolatry: that religion and idolatry are synonymous terms: that he who worships, under whatever sect or denomination, is an idolater: and that this conclusion is not so much a-theism as a-idolism. But the most important feature in this volume I take to be, that which shews morality uncontaminated with religion to be the great essential in all human affairs to generate human happiness. This you will find to be a leading feature in all the volumes of " The Republican," but more particularly in this eighth volume. Though they exhibit great literary defects, jointly ov/ing to my inability and situation, as soon as you can read the English Lan- guage, I feel convinced, that you can read nothing more useful to you as individuals, or as exiled patriots, than the eight volumes of " The Republican," paying more attention to the matter than to the stile or correctness of printing. With these recommendations, I take my leave, assuring you, that my freedom springs from a desire to see you well employed during the time of your exile, and that you may obtain a clear understanding of the best political principles for the future bene- fit of yourselves and your countrymen in general. I certainly do consider, that you have exhibited some defects, while the helm of affairs in Spain was in your hands; though I am not bhnd to the power of the priests, to the character and state of ignorance of the people among whom you dwelt, and to the many and great excuses to which you are entitled on that account. RICHARD CARLILE. A RESPECTFUL ADDRESS TO THE INHABITANTS OF NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE AND ITS VICINITY. BY RICHARD CARLILE. PRINTED BY WILLIAM KENT, 99, SIDE. 1834. 0titirr00, ^c. Ladies and Gentlemen, I have sojourned a mouth with you and must take my leave, to which, with some I am aware that I shall be very welcome, more welcome to leave than to stay; but such are not friends to man or to themselves. M}'^ purpose is accomplished. I came a stranger, other than by tlie publicity of my name, to make myself kno^rn to you. I have succeeded in so doing among at least five thousand persons. That is sufficient for my future purpose. I have planted the gospel by revelation in this town and its vicinity where before nothing but the mystery unrevealed had ex- isted. I have sown the spirit upon the soil of the letter, and I fear not the increase becoming a goodly harvest of reason evident in righteousness. You have hitherto been deceived in the name of Christianity. It has not belonged to you. It belongs not to unrevealed mystery. It is not to be asso- ciated with vices or bad habits of any kind. It is not even to be mixed up with the toleration or endurance of an association of vices and bad habits. It is not made up of dissenting opinions. There cannot be an ignorant christian. You may as well talk of christian cattle as of an unlettered man being a christian. The fault is not in the man who is left unlettered ; a christian church would not leave a man in that condition ; but the fault is in those who pretend to build a christian church, and who build on the foundation of perj)etuated ignorance instead of increasing knowledge. The fault is in the ministry, in the magistrate, in the law. A church is a congregation of the peoi)le. They may be congregated in the name of the church and may be any thing but christian. They may be doers and followers of evil. They may \vaste tlieir time and assemble without plan or purpose of imiu'oveiiient. They may hear nothing but the 4 dead language of mystery, an unknown tongue to them ; but never the tongue of the Holy Spirit. They may be ex- cited with vocal and instrumental music ; with the pythonic fervour of mysterious prayer and preaching ; but they must leave such a scene uninstructed. In the name of Christ, de- mand for the people a church in which there shall be some- thing useful constantly taught, which shall be truly the fountain of human knowledge, which shall lay its foundation in the catholicity of the human race, in which the baptism of infants shall not be a fallacious mockery, nor that of adults a mere ludicrous figure, in which the sacraments shall not be mysteries but sciences ; the second birth, or birth imto righteousness, a reality ; and the resurrection and ascension made practical in visible effects on human life. Christ is the light of human life, of which every soul may be trained to partake, may be improved by partaking, and cannot be truly said to be an existence without Christ. He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life : he that believeth not the Son shall not see life. — John chap. 3, ver. 36. Believing here means possession and not a mere expression of appro- bation. Christ is the perfection of light, an inexhaustible fountain from which man may freely draw without dimin- ishing, and may fill himself without depriving his neighbour; in partaking of which there can be no excess, no surfeit, but an increased thirst that is not painful ; a desire that may grow and be gratified : and the state of humanity that is brought to this fountain is the only state that can form and realize a church of Christ. The subject is beautifully illus- trated by the prophet Isaiah at the 55th chapter and 1st verse : — " Ho, every one that thirsteth, come ye to the waters, and he that hath no money, come ye buy and eat ; yea, come, buy wine and milk without money and without price. Wherefore do ye spend money for that which is not bread? and your labour for that which satisfieth not? hearken diligently unto me, and eat ye that which is good." In these words you have the contrast drawn of your church as it is and the church as it should be. It is meant to be a labouring, a digging, a planting, a weeding, and all the ne- cessary preparatory labour for a harvest or birth of mind. This is the garden of Eden, and here only can grow the trees of knowledge and of life. There is allegory in the sacred scriptures ; and all the more so as the mystery is laid before ignorance ; but the spirit of h'ght removetli the evil dispersetii the allegory, and assimilates the language to tfae criticisms of human reason. Thej^^r^o?/^/ advent of Christ was not necessary to the for- mation of a true christian church ; the s])irit of Christ alone was necessary. The doctrine of the jjersonal advent was not taught in the first hundred years of tliat which is now mis- called the christian era. It was a corruption of the doctrine of Christ begun in the second century ; and in tlie third cen- tury the corruption grew so deep as to assert nothing but Immanity and to deny the spirit or divinity of Christ. This is the course dissent is now taking. This will entirely fritter away the whole spirit, plan, and purpose of the christian religion ; and, if it succeed, draw mankind back to a paganism stripped of its philosophy and its ethics ; to all its ceremonies and superstitions without its science ; to its uncivilized bar- barisms ; and to its spirit of war. And all this arises from the error of }>ersonifying Christ as God, and corrupting the jmrity and perfection of divinity by an ideal mixtuie of hu- manity. It is putting the piu'e spirituality of the original christian doctrine upon a level with the humanized gods of the pagan world : and thus it is, that we have had the dark ages instead of the ages of light in the last eighteen hundred yeare ; and thus it is, that we have retrograded from the high state of civilization to which the pagan world had attained in the Augustan era, a bright period in the annals of the human race for literature, philosophy, and human accomplishments ; so bright, that it was named the birth time of Christ, or in- tellectual life and light dawning upon the world's peace ; so bright, that the present state of the human race sinks below the horizon by the reflection and comparison, sinks even into the shades below. I have appeared and laboured among you to stem tliis tor- rent downwards ; this torrent that carries with it the vitality of whatever is humanly useful. I have not been here unre- viled ; but I read that as the condition predicted of ail who should first preach the true doctrine of Christ as God. I rejoice that this reproach is confined to a few and that the many have dealt with me justly. I rejoice to find that these few are not of good repute ; but I would that they were awearances, under a variety of names of attributes and powers. The Loixl of Hosts and God of Israel is the ruling power of the planetary hosts, as of the human mind ; and hence arose the necessity of the writer's personification to represent the varied power of God under the attribute of Unity. The bible then is re- plete, wonderfully replete, with science as to physics ; and it is in the representation of every variety of the human char- acter, in the direction of that which is prone to good, and in the prescribed means of correcting that which is prone to evil. Few, very few indeed, have they been who have un- derstood it, so as to make it useful to mankind. Great, very great has been the mischief, which mistakes of its character mixing with bad passions have produced. Let us try Abraham as one of the names of Deity. At Galatians, ch;ip. 4, verse 24, we are told, that the story of Abraham and his wives is an allegory — that the two wives are the two places producing the two covenants — and that Abraham, of course, is God the Father, and author of the two covenants. That is one i>roof. Christ represented as saying, " your father Abraham saw my day and rejoiced ;" and " before Abraham was I am," is another. 8 Abraham described as the father of the faithful is a third proof. The name itself, first, as A-bram, is the same as the Bram-a of the Hindoos. Second, as Ab-ram, is Ab, the fa- ther. Ram, or chief god of the Hindoos, that same Ram being the Aries or Lamb of God in the Zodiac, slain on a cross from the foundation of the world. The Rama, again, who was the brother of Christna in the Hindoo mythology. I should mention that the sacred scriptures of the Hindoos are very like the old and new testament. The letter H added to the names of Abram and Sara, making Abraham and Sarah, is the symbolical letter in the Hebrew language of the name Jehovah ; two H's being sub- stantially that name, making Abraham a triune name of God. The Asiatic meaning of the word Sara, was star or bright- ness ; and hence the additional letter H made it the star or brightness of Jehovah or Christ, the covenant of the Mes- siah, as Hagar's offspring was the covenant of the law. The whole bible is made up of symbolical language of that kind, truly wonderful in its construction, and admitting of trial and proof by numbers for letters, as the science of Algebra, setting forth every science, and making the sum of science to be God, and the revelation of that God, or science, to be the salvation of man from evil. And they who read that bible, according to the letter, or history, or personal appearance of God, do mistake it, and have the deeply-woven vail of mys- tery on their minds. The revelation, the unveiling, is to read it as of the spirit of God, acting by and through all ex- istence, not incomprehensible where perceived, incomprehen- sible only where not perceived in its whole. Abraham, again, among the ancients, and according to Sanconiathon, a Phenician, was the planet, Saturn, the fa- ther of the gods, Father Time, or Chronus, devouring or sacrificing his children ; hence the offering of Isaac as a sa- crifice, that Isaac being the Messiah or second covenant, was the same type, not a type of personal reality, but a type of eternal principle, bodied forth from time to time by the hu- man mind in a variety of names, as language has gone through changes ; the lamb slain from the foundation of the world, annually crucified in the Zodiac, and periodically or perpetually, as reason, or the logos incarnate in man, working against the evils of human society, making Christianity to be as old as the creation, or Christ coeternal and coeqnal with God oi- Jehovah. Ten thousand irresistible elucidations of this kind may l)e worked out illustrative of the deeply-woven mystery of the bible, all reducible to science, and all, when understood, in- structive, useful, and encouraging to the human mind ; when misvuiderstood, the letter makes up a catalogue of hor- rors and terrors. It is the letter that has been the ground of all infidel objections, which no minister of the letter could answer, because all have been alike infidels, unbeliever^, misbelievers ; truly proving that nothing but ignorance is atheism, and atheism nothing but ignorance ; for no man denies what he knows of God, or of the science of exist- ence ; and every wise and good man denies and rejects the abuses of the personification of God, and seeks the abo- lition of what idolatry and superstition have set up for reli- gious worship. So that, in reality, the infidel objectors, mistaking the letter for the reality or the spirit, have been nearer the spirit of Christianity than those who have pro- fessed to swallow it all, mistaken and misunderstood, or who read mechanically, without searching, without criticism, without reason or the spirit of Christ, without understand- ing ; and who have made as much use of it, or have gained as much benefit from it, and no more, than as if they had roiled every leaf into a pill, and had swallowed it with a hoi)e that the letter or paper would have digested into spirit. I con- fess that I have reached the knowledge of the spirit of the book by a studious perseverance in a scientific objection to the letter, which I still reject, as earnestly, as openly, and as perseveringly as ever. I embrace the spirit, I discard the person or personality of God ; that is, I worship God, but I reject man's superstition ; and the true worship of God is in spirit and in truth, which is synonymous with seeking trutli wlierewith to root out error — planting good and rooting out the weeds of evil — throwing light upon tlie mind and removing the darkness of ignorance. Let us try Moses, whether it be the name of God or man. All the divme names, in their personal characters, are repre- sented as going down into Kgypt and suffering some perse- cution from a tyrant. It is a grand j)olilical point in the instruction of the whole book, that it sets forth the tyranny of king-craft, and exhorts man to save himself from it. The 10 condition of that salvation, in the old testament, is a code of republican laws, suited to a commonwealth, which was ob- tained on the escape from and overthrow of Pharaoh, is set forth as valid until Saul was chosen king, and then lost sight of until the time of Josiah, or near the end of the kingdom ; so that law prevailed only when there was no king to rule — the one being the state of liberty, the other of slavery. Such is the moral of the story ; and I present it, as I believe it was intended to be presented, as a matter; x)f spiritual instruction to all people, and not as the literaj|^MSf^ tory of one peopie, a state of pure and self-governing li^'ty being essential to human welfare, as well as to the dignity of man, and the undivided and uninterrupted worship of God. Moses is represented as the Saviour of the children of Is- rael from the tyranny of Pharaoh, and their lawgiver, pre- paratory to their inheritance of the land of promise that should flow with milk and honey. That land, we know, has not been realized, though the law is written. We have not the spirit of it engraved on our hearts, and we, Jews and all, are waiting for another Moses, or for the Moses or Mes- siah to come and deliver us from our present evil. That fu- ture Moses must be our possession of the spirit of the law and the gospel, and our corresponding practice. There was no personal Moses to introduce the law ; there will be none to realize its promise or practice. One of the names of the pagan Bacchus was Myses, pre- cisely of the same significancy as Moses. Another of his names was Yes, which is, in Greek, our I H S, or Saviour, Jesus. This same Bacchus, who was also considered the sun, the son of Jupiter, miraculously born, was made the hero of a precisely similar story with Moses, in leading an army by a miracle through the Red Sea from Africa, and conquering India. The orphic hymn to Bacchus, as Myses, is beautifully descriptive of the similar power of God. This Bacchus is not to be mixed up with the god of the barrel, and the orgies of drunkenness, of which there is everywhere too much, outraging and disgracing the name and principle of Christianity as well as of paganism. I fear we are not im- proved as a people on that ground. The I H S was emblaz- oned on all the pagan altar pieces of Bacchus, as now on those in our churches, and the same inscription may be traced to the altars of the universal god Buddha. 11 As 1 do not admit the personal existence of Bacchus, as a pagan god, or of Buddha as a Hindoo or general ancient de- ity, and seeing the synonyme both in name and principle so complete between Moses and Myses or Bacchus, taking Mo- ses to mean Saviour, and the salvation a political one from the tyranny of the king of Egypt, or any tyrannical king ; finding the children of Israel in other respects to be ideal, and indicative at all times of a state of mind as to be distinguished from another or lower state of mind ; weighing the case against the absence of all corroborating history ; seeing the narrated appearance of Moses as one of the triune saviours of the transfiguration of the gosjjel, I conclude that Moses was no more than one of the names of God, manifested in the power of an oppressed people rising up against their oppres- sor, and working out their salvation by resistance to tyranny, and by the final establishment of laws for their governance founded on righteousness. If, as Paul says, Hagar, or Agar, meant Mount Sinai, and her offspring the first covenant or law, Abraham and Moses come into the same identity with Jehovah ; and so we get over the difficulty, of John 1, verse 18, "no man hath seen God at any time," as standing up against the idea of Moses having been a man looking upon and talking with God, as a man talks to a man face to face. In the 10th chapter and first verses of the second epistle to the Corinthians, the spiritual identity of Moses and Christ is laid down in plain language as one and the same spirit, just as when Isaiah, chap. 43, verses 3 11, declared Jehovah to be the only Saviour ; the identity of Jehovah and Christ in spirit must be admitted, or a triumph be given to the misreading and vailed Jews. It is only by this spiritual reading and a sinking of the letter, personal history and personifications, that the bible proves a beautiful, scientific, and instructive whole, free from contradictions, grounds of objection, and much that is pain- ful and difficult to a moral and conscientious mind. There is no honest reading and approbation on any other ground, beyond the plain moral precepts, which are every where alike, and every where good. This was called the gnomo- logical part of sacred scripture ; but the theological part is that which requires the spiritual reading that shall sink the letter, and bring God and man nearer together, in ojjening 12 file fountain of divine nature to become a law guiding liuma- iiity through the labyrinth of life. Let us try T>avid as name of God or man. The word signifies ivell-heloved. Isaiah says, chap. 5, " Noiv ivill I sing to my well-beloved a song of my beloved, touching his vineyard^ That well-beloved is David, King, or God of IsraeL It is the same David addressed in Solomon's Song, as; beloved and well-beloved. God is Love, John\'i first Epistle. David, well-beloved, is the Father of Solomon, the Prince of Peace ; another of his sons is Adonijah, which U literally the God Adonis. Christ is also the Prince of Peace and Son of David. CHRIST IS ALL, which means that all power centres in the unity of Christ. The adver- sary of David was SauL The adversary of Christ was Said. The Psalms of David are not psalms written by David as a man ; but the psalms of inspired poets, written of and con- cerning David as God. So, the Word of God is not, as a writing, a word written by God, other than in the spiritual sense, in which the writer is inspired by God ; but it is the word of the inspired penman of and concerning God ; than which, inspiration could write nothing else. The idea of a personal God corruj)ts every thing, and more particularly the beauties of language. *'No man hath seen God at any time," John. Christ is God, ergo, no man hath seen Christ at any time ; but God or Christ dwelleth in us, as we possess the spirit, the knowledge of God or Christ ; and hence God or Christ is in us incarnate or in our flesh, God or Christ of all ; an€l not God or Christ in the form and substance of an individual human being, more than of others. "And we know that the Son of God is come, and hath given us an understanding, that we may know him that is true, and we are in him that is true, even in his son Jesus Christ. This is the true God and eternal life. Little children, keep your- selves from idols." Conclusion of John's first Epistle. In the third epistle, verse 11, we read : — "He that doeth good is of God : but he that doeth evil hath not seen God." So that, a life of strict righteousness is all that is required of man, is God in man, and man as son of God. Can it be sup- posed that an ignorant or wicked man is to be counted a son of God ? Righteous doing is practical knowledge and the manifestation of God in man. If the unitarians step in with their qualms and quibbles, I tell them, they have no true 13 history of their Man-Christ, without which they have noth- ing of Christ more than was known to the pagans, nor so much. The first preaching of Christ was as God. The mixture of humanity was a corruption. In the 22nd Chapter of the Book of Revelations, and at the l6tii verse, we read, that Jesus is the root and oflspring of David, the bright and morning star. Tlie interpolatioa of the conjunction, and the bright and morning star, injures the sense. The original states the unity of Jesus and David as God or King of Israel, one of the symbols of which is the sun, in relation to the planetary system. This book was written in the Greek langiiage. David, in the Greek lan- guage, would be written aabia, the root and otispring of which are the two Deltas or triangles. These conjoined, by an inversion, make a star and a masonic figure of the unit- ed power of God, the ascending and descending apex being symbolical of fire and water. The eight triangles produced by the united figure are symbolical of the name Jeliovah, the number of which is eight. The triangle being a symbol also of trinity in unity, was both root and offspring of the name of Christ. The remaining letters, a b i, signify fa- ther, or my father. It is thus that all the names of God in the bible are scientifically and wonderfully constructed, de- veloping power in every way, and bringing all power under the description of unity or one God. The whole language of the book is so scientifically constructed, admitting of a spi- ritual reading by the science of Algebra, as well as by and through the letter; therefore to suppose that a child oi- an un- lettered man is to understand the theologue or discourse about God in this book, is to be ignorant of its great pur])ort. — There is not a priest or minister in England, of any church, that understands it ; though, by the rational or spiritual in- terpretation, or by adhering to the plain moral precept, a man of plain understanding may receive the law of righteous- ness, as suflnicient instruction for his welfare and salvation. The book, as a whole, must have been the laboured accumu- lation, preservation, and condensation of the growing science of ages, perha])s of thousands of years ; the work of tire most eminent of iMaidcind ; a perfect prodigy of the power of the human mind ; the i)lan, purpose and labour of successively- associated wisdom, to set forth the true nature of man, the good and evil of which he is susceptible, as the ways of God 14 to man ; the just condition of his salvation from evil ; all that man can know of God ; the past and future of man ; with the bright encouragement of his choice and power to make the future an improvement upon the past. The freemasons profc^ss to have the secret of the bible, or the key of interjTetation. They have the mystery, the symbols, the appearance or shadow of science ; but they have it not substantially and in reality. Freemasonry is a corrupted continuation of the ancient mysteries of the pagan world, with the loss of the spirit, word, or keystone. It is the vailed Judaism without Christ. In ceremony, it is what the ancient mysteries were, a dramatic representation of the power of God, of which the sacred scriptures were the letter, plan, plot, drama, or ceremony. The acting of it made up their ceremonial worship. So now of freemasonry where best understood. It has been objected to me, that, if I condemn the letter of the sacred scriptures, I make it a lie. I do not condemn the letter. I do not see it to be a lie in the book ; but I see it to be made a lie only when professing teachers, not hav- ing the spirit, misuse it, and abuse it, and their hearers with it. They are they who have eyes and see not, ears and hear not, understandings and understand not ; the blind leaders of the blind. Read it rightly, with the sj^irit of knowledge, and it becomes a body of reasonable, scientific instruction. It is now perverted into a gross idolatry and superstition. The quakers of the seventeenth century began to read it rightly. Penn and Barclay, Ratlibone and Hancock, have argued as strongly against the letter of the bible as Thomas Paine or any deist. Emanuel Swedenborg got a spiritual insight into the volume ; but he did not purify himself so as to purge away the dross of the letter. I know a learned gentleman in the metropolis, who has spent twenty-five years in the East Indies cultivating a knowledge of Asiatic lan- guages, and entering into all the depths of theological science, who can reduce the whole Hebrew volume of the Old Tes- tament into its scientific elements, and treat the Greek of the New Testament in the same w^y, and still saperstitiously, I tell him so face to face, clings to the letter as separately true on its historical pretensions. Of two differing inter- pretations, both cannot be true ; and I give up that, the letter, which is not defensible at any point or any ground of 15 evidence, and adhere to tliat spiritual, scientific, and rational iriterpretation which is defensible at every point, on every ground of evidence. By so doing, 1 get rid of all the dis- sensions and objections of all the sects, and all the objections of infidels. I restore Christianity to the ground it must, to exist, occupy, the ground on which it can be defended as a whole, equally with any of its parts or particles, as truth i science, in logic, or in reason. I am not insensible how great a stumbling stone and rock of offence is laid in Sion by the letter of the sacred scriptures, and I may say vrith Paul, Romans chap. 10, ver. 1, '• Brethren, my heart's desire and prayer to God for Israel is, that they might be saved. For I bear them record, that they have a zeal for God, hut not according to knowledge" Again, chap. 9. ver. 6, " They are not all Israel which are of Israel ;"' and at chap. 2, verses 28 and 29, " For he is not a Jew which is one outwardlv ; but he is a 5ew which is one inwardly." Then, as to Israelite and Jew, the evident sig- nification of the character is a state of mind. An Israelite, in its purity, means a seer of God, a wrestler with God, and, as the word has been used by Sanconiathon as Yesroile^ it means also the followers of Jesus or Yes, which is the same name, a name of record exceeding two " christian eras." The name of the Son that is coeternal with the Father. The Isis of Egypt was precisely the same name. Isis Omnia and Christ is All, being words of the same meaning, when rightly interpreted and understood. It boots nothing that an abuse has been made of the name of Isis, the meaning of it is Creator, Saviour, Preserver. Equal abuse has been made of the name of Christ. That an order of men named Israelites and Jews have been raised uj), I question not. But that such an order was a self-governing nation, independent of other nations, I ques- tion. The word Jew is one of the names of God, and is a degree higher than Israelite in character, meaning perject knowledge of God, while Israelite expresses an approach to that perfection. I am not for limiting the existence of such orders to any time or nation. I can suppose them to have been scattered through all times and nations of which vv^e have any record : as we read at Acts chap. 2., ver. 5, " And there dwelt at Jerusalem Jews, devout men, out of every na- tion under heaven." This sets forth Jerusalem as the city IG of a people in a peculiar state of mind, which is all that is ])ionused of the Jerusalem to come. It was to have been and is to be the city of Christ on the throne of David ; but in the time in which David is supposed to liave lived on earth personally, there was no city of Jerusalem. It was then ailed Kaditis and was a city of Syria in Palestine, inhabited , a peo})le called Syi'ians. That which is to come is to be tlie reign of reason in the human mind, after the overthrow of idolatry and superstition, religious dissent, and sectarian cinirches. Christ, wlien known, will bring us into one fold, one church. I'he present archbishop of Canterbury, Dr. Howley, then bishop of London, sojourning at Weymouth, was invited and came to Dorchester with an intent to visit me in Dorchester gaol, in the year 1823. He first took the precaution to call upon the chaplain of the gaol, to ask what sort of evidence Mr Carlile wanted for the satisfaction of his mind. The chaplain answered, nothing short of demonstration, as you would demonstrate a mathematical problem. Then, said the bishop, we have no evidence of that kind, we cannot demon- strate any thing of Christianity in that way ; and he came not near me. I have this on the authority of the chaplain. Now, what the bishop could not do, I have since learnt to do : I can demonstrate Christianity to be true and good and essential to the welfare and salvation of the human race ; not such a Christianity as the archbishop superintends ; but such as God or Christ superintends ; not according to the letter of the sacred scriptures, without the aid of the spirit ; but by and through the spirit that can trace the science and meaning and apply the key to the unlocking of the mystery of the letter. The mystery has made a Babylon. The key, spirit, science, is to convert that Babylon into a new and true Jerusalem, a world of peace as succeeding a world of war ; the triumph of reason over superstition, of Christ over the prince of darkness, of the worship of God as a spirit in truth, and not as a person in idolatry. Then come. Lord Jesus, come quickly, and reign ETERNAL LOVE ! Newcastle, July 4, 1834. RICHARD CARLILE. P. S. Much more illustration was prepared ; but I have limited myself to one sheet. See The Isis, a London Periodical of 1832, Nos. 12 to 21, for a further illustration. Read freely, think freely, and put your trust in God, rather than in man. WAT TYLER, DRAMATIC POEM, IN THREE ACTS, BY ROBERT SOUTHEY, Esq. POET-LAUREATE. '*"*—"' PRINTED AND PUBLISHED BY R. CARLILE, 62, FLEET STREET. Price Threepefice. THE HISTORY OF WAT TYLER. The history of Wat Tyler lias always held a distinguished place in the English records ; and though some men affect to disapprove of his conduct, all men have concurred in admiring his courage. The nation, even at that distant period, had begun to rise above the barbarous state into which the conquest, by Willi;\m the Norman, had plunged it, and to shew strong signs of returning life. Such is the effect which society works upon a people — such the consequence which the human mind will produce upon itself, when left to pursue its natural course without interruption. The wars between the English and the French governments, which took place in those days, were like all others, ruinous and expensive. To defray the costs of these, a tax of three groats was ordered to be paid by every man and woman above the age of fifteen years: t|ns unheard of imposition had too much in it of the nature of conquest, and savout;«d too strongly ©f the nature of despotism, to be willingly sub- mitted to. It gave rise to a discussion, amongst the people, about the right of the government to adopt such a measure, and the result of that discussion was resist- ance. Their motto was : — When Adam dclv'd, and Eve span, Who was then a gentleman? " The first disorder," says Hume, " was raised by a blacksmith, in a village of Essex. The tax-gatherers came to this man's shop while he was at work; and they demanded payment for his daughter, whom he asserted to be below the age assigned by the statute. One of these fellows offered to produce a very indecent proof to the contrary, and at the same time laid hold of the maid, which the father resenting, immediately knocked out the ruffian's brains with his hammer. The by-standers applauded the action, and exclaimed that it was full time for the people to take ven- geance on their tyrants, and to vindicate their native liberty. They immediately flew to arms ; the whole neighbourhood joined in the sedition ; the flame spread in an instant over that county, and many others, before the government had the least warning of the danger." The populace, amounting to one hundred thousand men, assembled on Blackheath, under their leaders, Wat I'yler and Jack Straw. They sent a message to the King, (who had taken shelter in the Tower) and desired a conference with him. Richard sailed down the Thames, in a barge, for that purpose ; but, on approaching the shore, he was alarmed at the appearance of the people, and he returned to the fortress. The people, in the meantime, had broken into the City of London ; where they cut oft' the heads of those whom they disliked, and committed other acts of a similar de- scription. To quiet them, the King promised that their grievances should be redressed ; but, as it afterwards proved, these promises were never intended to be performed. ' During this transaction, another body had broken into the Tower, had murdered the Chancellor, and Treasurer, with others of the Nobles; and continued their ravages in the city. The King passing along Smithfield, met with Wat Tyler, at the head of the populace, and entered into a conference with him. Tyler ordered his companions to retire; he went amongst the King's Company, and while he was con- versing with Richard, Walworth the Mayor of London drew his sword, and with the assistance of the other persons in the King's service, he murdered him. Richard then advanced to the populac?, and promised them their freedom if they would return to their homes; but as soon as he had re-obtained the upper hand, he revoked their charters, and reduced them to the slavish condition in which they had been before. The city of London, in commemoration of the part which their Mayor had taken in the above transaction, wear a representation of Walworth's dagger upon their coat of arms to this day. .^' WAT TYLER. ACT J. SCENE, A BLACKSMITH S SHOP. IVat Tyler at work within. A May-pole before the Door. ALICE, PIERS, &c. SOXG. Cheehful on this holida3'. Welcome we the merry May. On ev'ry sunny hillock spread. The pale primrose rears her head ; Rich with sweets the western gale Sweeps along the cowslip'd dale. Every bank with violets gaj^ Smiles to welcome in the J\lay. The linnet from the budding grove. Chirps her vernal song of love. The copse resounds the throstle's notes, On each wild gale sweet music floats ; And melody from every spray, Welcomes in the merry May. Cheerful on this holiday. Welcome we the merry May. [^Darjce. During the Dance, Tyler lays down his Ham- mer, and sits mournfully down before his Door. [To him. HOB CARTER. Why so sad, neighbour ? — do not these gay sports, This revelry of youth, recall the days When we too mingled in tlie revelry : And lightly tripping in the morris dance Welcomed the merry month ? TYLER. Aye, we were young ; No cares had quell'd the hey-day of the blood : Wc sported deftlj- in the April morning, Nor mark'd the black clouds gathering o'er our noon ; Nor fear'd the storm of night. HOB. Beshfew me, Tyler, But ray heartjoys to see the imps so cheerful ! Voung, hale, and happy, wlij* should they de- stroy These blessings by reflection? TYLER. ■ Look ye neighbour — You have known me long. HOB. Since we were boys together, And play'd at barley-brake, and danc'd the morris : — Some five-and-twenty years ! TYLER. Was not I young, And hale and happy? HOB. Cheerful as the best. TYLER. Have not I been a staid, hard-working man? Up with the lark at labour — sober — ^honcst — Of an unblemish'd character? HOB. Who doubts it, There's never a man in Essex bears a better. TYLER. And shall not these, tho' young and hale and happy, Look on with sorrow to the future hour ? Shall not reflection poison all tlieir pleasures? When I, the honest, staid, liard-working T3'^ ler. Toil thro' the long course of the summer's day Still toiling, yet still poor ! when with hard labour Scarce can I furnish out mj' dail^' food — And age comes on to steal away my strength. And leave me poor and wretched ! Why should this be ? My youth was regular — my labour constant — I married an industrious, virtuous woman: No'r while I toiled and sweated at the anvil. Sat she neglectful of her spiiming w heel. — Hob — I have only six groats in the world, And they must soon by law be taken from me. WAT TYLER; HOB. Curse on these taxes — one succeeds another — Our ministers — panders of a king's will — . Praia all our wealth away — waste it in re- vels — And lure, or force awa_y our boys, whoshouid be The props of our old age ! — to fill their ar- mies And feed the crows of France ! year follows year. And still we madly prosecute the war ; — Draining our wealth — distressing our poor peasants — Slaughtering our youths — and all to crown our chiefs Witli glory ! — I detest the hell-sprung name. TYLER. What matters me who wears the crown of France ? Whether a Richard or a Charles possess it 1 They reap the glory — they enjoy the spoil — We pay — we bleed ! — The sun would shine as cheerly. The rains of heaven as seasonably fall, Tho' neither of these Royal pests existed. HOB. Nay — as for that, we poor men should fare better ! No legal robbers tlien should force away The hard-earn'd wages of our honest toil. The Parliament for ever cries more money, The service of the state demands more money. Just heaven ! of what service is the state? TYLER. Oh ! 'tis of vast importance ! who should pay for The luxuries and riots of the court ? AVho should support the flaunting courtier's pride, Pay for their midnight revels, their rich gar- ments. Did not the state enforce ? — Think ye, my friend , That I — a humble blacksmith, here at Dept- ford. Would part with tliese six groats — earn'd by hard toil, All that I have ! to massacre the Frenchmen, Murder as enemies men I never saw ! Did not the state compel me ? (Tax gatherers pass by) There they go, Privileg'd r s ! — (Piers and Alice advance to ?iim.) ALICE. Did we not dance it well to-day, my father? You know I always loved these village sports. Even from my infancy, and yet mcthink* I never tript along the mead so gaily. You know they chose me queen, and your friend Piers Wreath'd me this cowslip garland for my head — Is it not simple? you are sad ray father ! You should have rested from your work to-day And given a few hours up to merriment — But you are so serious ! TYLER. Serious, my good girl ! I may well be so : when I look at thee. It makes me sad ! thou art too fair a flower. To bear the wintry wind of poverty ? PIERS. Yet I have often heard you speak of riches Even with contempt : they caiHiot purchase peace, Or innocence, or virtue — sounder sleep Waits on the weary plowman's lowly bed. Than on the downy couch of luxury Lulls the rich slave of pride and indolence. I never wish for wealth I my arm is strong. And I can purchase by it a coarse meal. And hunger savours it. TYLER. \''oung man, thy mind Has yet to bear the hard lesson of experience. Thou art yet young, the blasting breath of want Has not yet froze the current of thy blood. PIERS. Fare not the birds well, as from spray to spray BHthsome they bound — yet find their simple food Scattered abundantly ? TYLER. No fancied boundaries of mine and thine Restrain their wanderings : Nature gives enough For all ; but Man, with arrogant selfishness. Proud of his heaps, hoards up superfluous stores Robb'd from his weaker fellows, starves the ' poor. Or gives to pity what he owes to justice! PIERS. So I have heard our good friend John Ball preach. ALICE. My father, wherefore was John Ball irapri- . soned ? Was he not charitable, good, and pious ! I have heard him say that all mankind arc brethren. A DRAMATIC POEM. And that like brethren they should love each other ; — Was not thai doctrine pious 1 TYLER. Rank sedition — High treason, every syllable, my child : The priests cry out on him for heresy, The nobles all detest him as a rebel, And this good man, the minister of Christ, This man, the friend and brotiier of mankind. Lingers in the dark dungeon ! — ray dear Alice, Retire awhile. (Exit Alice.) Piers, I would speak to thee Even with a father's love! you are much witli me, And I believe do court my conversation ; Thou could'st not chuse thee forth a truer friend ; I would fain see thee happy, but I fear Thy very ^drtues will destroy thy peace. My daughter — she is young — not yet fifteen — • Piers thou art generous, and thy youthful heart Warm with affection ; this close intimacy WiJl ere long grow to love. PIERS. Suppose it so ; Were that an evil, Walter? She is mild. And cheerful, and industrious — now methinks With such a partner life would be most happy ! Why would you warn me then of wretchedness? Is there an evil that can harm our lot ? I have been told the virtuous must be happy, And liave believed it true ; tell me, my frierid. What shall disturb the virtuous? TYLER. Poverty — A bitter foe ! PIERS. Nay, you have often told me That happiness does not consist in riches. TYLER. It is most true : but tell me my dear boy, Could'st thou be happy to behold thy wife Pining with want ?— the children ofyour loves Clad in the s(|Ualid rags of wretchedness ? And wh(*n thy liarH and unremitting toil Had earned with pain a scanty reconi])ense, Could'st thou be patient when the law should rob tliee. And leave thee without bread and pennylcss? PIERS. It is a dreadful picture. TYLER. ''lis a true one. PIERS. But yet methinks our sober industry Migfit drive away the danger, 'lis but little Tliat I could wish — food for our frugal meals. Raiment, however homely, and a bed To sliield us from the night. TYLER, Thy honest reason Could wish no more : but were it not most wretched. To want the coarse food for the frugal meal ? And by the orders ofyour merciless lord. If you by chance were guilty of being poor, To be turned out adrift to the bleak world. Unhoused, unfriended ? — Piers, I liave not been idle, I never ate the bread of indolence — Could Alice be more thrifty than her mother? Yet but with one child, and that one, how good Thou knowest, I scarcely can provide tJie wants Of nature : look at these wolves of the law. They come to drain me of my hard earn'd wages. I have already paid the heavy tax Laid on the wool that clothes me — on my leather. On all the needful articles of life ! And now three groats [and I worked hard to earn them] The Parliament demands — and I must pay them. Forsooth, for liberty to wear my head. — Enter Tax-gatherers, COLLECTORS. Three groats a head for all your family. PIERS. Why is this money gathered? — 'tis aJiard tax On the poor labourer ! It can never be, That government should thus distress the peo- Go to the rich for money — honest labour Ought to enjoy its fruits. COLLECTOR. The state wants money. War is expensive — 'tis a glorious war, A war of honour, and must be supported. — Three groats a head. TYLER, There, three for my own head. Three for my wife's ! — what will the state tax next 1 COLLECTOR. You have a daughter. 6 WAT tvler; TYLER. She is below the age — not yet fifteen. COLLECTOR. You would evade the tax.— TYLER. Sir Officer, I have paid you fairly what the law demands. [^Alice and her Mother enter the Shop. The Tax-gatherers go to her. One of them lays hold of her. She scream<;, Tyler goes in.'] COLLECrOR. You say she's under age. Alice screaym again, Tyler knocks out the Tax-gatherer's Brains. His Companions Jly. PIERS. A just revenge. TYLER. Most just indeed : but in the eye of the law 'Tis murder — and the murderer's lot is mine. [Piers goes out.] ('Tyler sits down mournfully.) ALICE. Fly, my dear father ! let us leave this place Before they raise pursuit. TYLER. Nay, nay, my child, Flight would be useless — I have done my duty : I have punish'd the brute insolence of lust And here will wait my doom. WIFE. Oh let us ay ! My husband, my dear husband I ALICE. Quit but this place. And we may yet be safe, and happy too. TYLER. It would be useless, Alice— 'twould but lengthen A wretched life in fear. (Cry uithout.) Liberty ! liberty ! (Enter Mob, Hob Carter, &c J (Cry) Liberty ! liberty !— No Pull tax !— No War! HOB. We have broke our chains — we will arise in anger — Tlie mighty multitude shall trample down The handful that oppress them. TYLER. Have ye heard So soon then of my murder ? HOB. Of 3'our vengeance. Piers ran throughput the village — told the news — Cried out to arms ! arm, arm for liberty ! For Liberty and Justice ! TYLER. INIy good friends. Heed well your danger, or be resolute : Learn to laugh menaces and force to scorn, Or leave me, I dare answer the bold deed — Death must come once : return you to your homes, Protect my wife and child, and on my grave Write why I died ; perhaps the time may come When honest Justice shall applaud the deed. " HOB. Nay, nay, — -we are oppressed, and have too long Knelt at our proud lord's feet — we have too long Obeyed their orders^ — bowed to their caprices. Sweated for them the wearying summer's day. Wasted for them the wages of our toil ; Fought for them, conquered for tliem, bled foe them, Still to be trampled on and still despis'd ; But we have broke our chains. r TOM MILLER. Piers is gone on Thro' all the neighbouring villages to spread The glorious tidings. HOB. He is hurried on To Maidstone, to deliver good John Ball, Our friend, our shepherd. (Mob ijicreases.) TYLER. Friends and Countrymen, Will ye then rise to save a r>i'.ionest man From the fierce clutches ot the bloody law ? Oh do not call to mind my private wrongs. That the state drain'd my hard earned pit- tance from me ; That, of his olfice proud, the foul collector Durst with lewd hand seize on my darling child. Insult her maiden modesty, and force A father's hand to vengeance : heed not this : Think not, my countr3'men, on private wrongs, Remember what yourselves have longendured. A DRAMATIC POEM. 7 Think of tke insults, wrongs, and contumelies, Ye bear from your proud lords — that your hard toil Manures the fertile fields — you plow the earth. You sow the corn, you reap the ripen'd har« vest, — They riot on the produce ! — That, like beasts. They sell you w ith their land— claim all the fruits Wiich the kindly earth produces as their own. The privilege, forsooth, of noble birth ! On, on to Freedom : feel but your own strength. Be but resolved, and these destructive tyrants Shall shrink before your vengeance. HOB. On to London — The tidings fly before us — the court trembles. Liberty ! — Vengeance ! — Justice ! ACT IL SCENE BLACKHEATH. ^ TYLER, HOB, &c. SONG. ' When Adam delv'd, and Eve span, ' 'Who was then the gentleman 1' "Wretched is the infapt's lot, Born within the straw roofd cot ! Be he generous, wise, or brave. He must only be a slave. Long, long labour, little rest. Still to toil to be oppress'd : Drain'd by taxes of his store, Punish'd next for being poor; This is the poor wretch's lot, Bom within the straw roofd cot. While the peasant works — to sleep ; What the peasant sows — to reap; On the couch of ease to lie, Kioting in revelry , Be he villain, be he fool. Still to hold despotic rule, Trampling on l)is slaves with sconi ; This is to be nobly born. ' When Adam delv'd, and Eve span, ' Who was then the Gentleman V JACK STRAW. The mob are up in London — the proud cour- tiers Begin to tremble. TOM MILLER. Aye, aye, 'tis time to tremble; Who'll plow their fields, who'll do their drud- gery now ? And work like horses, to give them the harvest ! JACK STRAW. I only wonder we lay quiet so long. We had always the same strength, and we de- ' served The ills we met with for not using it. HOB. Why do we fear those animals called lords 1 What is there in the name to frighten us 1 Is not my arm as mighty as a Baron's? Enter Piers antf John Ball. PIERS (to TYLEn> Have I done well, my father? — I remember'd This good man lay in prison. TYLER. My dear child. Most well ; the people rise for liberty. And their first deed should be to break the ' chains That bind the virtuous :^-0 thou honest priest — How much hast thou endured ? JOHN BALL. Why aye, my friend ! These squalid rags bespeak what I have suf- fered. I was revil'd — insulted — left to languish In a damp dungeon ; but I bore it cheerily — My heart was glad — for I have done my duty. I pitied my oppressors, and I sorrowed For the poor men of England. TYLER. They have felt Their strength — look round this heath ! lis thronged with men. Ardent for freedom ; mighty is the event That waits their fortune. JOHN BALL. I would fain address them. TYLER. Do so, my friend, and leach to them their duty. Remind them of their long withholden rights. What ho there ! silence I PIERS, Silence there, my friends. This good man would address you. HOB. Aye, aye, hear him — 8 WAT TYLER; He is no mealy mouthed court orator. To flatter vice, and pamper lordly pride. JOHN BALL. Friends ! Brethren ! for ye are my brethren all ; Englishmen, met in arms to advocate The cause of freedom ! hear me ! pause awhile In the career of vengeance ; it is true I am a priest ; but, as these rags may speak, Not one who riots in the poor man's spoil, Or trades witli his religion. I am one \V1k) preach tlie law of Christ, and in my life. Would practise what he taught. The son of God Came not to you in power ; humble in mien, Lowly in heart, the man of Nazareth Preach'd mercy, justice, love ; " Woe unto ye, Ye that are rich : — if that ye would be saved, Sell wliat ye have, and give unto the poor." So taught the saviour : oh, my honest friends ! Have ye not felt the strong indignant throb Of justice in your bosoms, to behold The lordly baron feasting on your spoils 1 Have you not in yo\jr hearts arraign'd the lot That gave him on the couch of luxury To pillow his head, and pass the festive day In sportive feasts, and ease, and revelry ? Have not you often in your conscience ask'd Why is the difference, wherefore should that man, No worthier than myself, thus lord it over me, j5 And bid me labour, and enjoy the fruits'? ■^Tlie God within your breasts has argued thus ! '^The voice of truth has murmur'd ; came ye ^ not As helpless to the world ? Shines not the sun With equal ray on both ? — Do ye not feel The selfsame winds of heaven as keenly parch ye? Abundant is the eajth — the Sire of all, Saw and pronounced that it was very good. Look round : the vernal fields smile with new flowers, Tlie budding orchard perfumes the soft breeze. And the green corn waves to the passing gale. There is enough for all, but 3'our proud Baron Stands up, and arrogant of strength exclaims, " I am a Lord — by nature I am noble ; These fields are mine, for I was bom to them, I was born in the castle — you, poor wretches, Whelp'd in the cottage, are by birth my slaves." Almighty God ! such blasphemies are utter'd I Almighty God ! such blasphemies bejiev'd ! TOM MILLER. This is something like a sermon. JACK STRAW. Where's the bishop Would tell you truths like these ? HOB. There was never a bishop among all the apos- tles. JOHN BALL. My bretliren ? PIERS. Silence, the good priest speaks. JOHN BALL. My brethren, these are trudis, and weighty ones ; Ye are all equal : nature made ye so. Equality is your birthright ; — when I gaze On the proud palace, and behold one man In the blood-purpled robes of ro^'alty. Feasting at ease, and lording over millions. Then turn me to the hut of poverty, And see the wretched lab'rerworn with toil, Divide his scanty morsel with his infants, I sicken, and indignant at the sight, " Blush for the patience of humauity." JACK STRAW. We will assert our rights. TOM MILLER. We'll tjtarople down These insolent oppressors. JOHN BALL. In good truths. Ye have cause for anger ; but, my honest friends. Is it revenge or justice that ye seek "? MOB. Justice, justice .' JOHN BALL Oh then remember mercy ; And though your proud oppressors spar'd not you. Shew you excel them in huraanityi They will use every art to disunite you. To conquer separately, by stratagem. Whom in a mass they fear— but be ye firm — Boldly demand your long forgotten rights, Your sacred, your inalienable freedom — Be bold — be resolute — be merciful ! And while you spurn the hated name of slaves. Shew you are men ! MOB. Long live our honest priest ! JACK STRAW. He shall be made archbishop. JOHN BALL. My brethren, I am plain John Ball, your friend, A DRAMATIC POEM. 9 Your equal : by die law of Christ enjoined To serve you, not command. JACK STRAW. March we for London. TYLER. Mark me, my friends — we rise for liberty — Justice shall be our guide : let no man dare To plunder in the tumult. MOB. Lead us on — Liberty ! — Justice ! ' (Exeunt, with cries of Liberty — no Poll Tax — -110 War.) sceke changes to the tower. King Richahd, Archbishop of Cakteh- BUKY, Sir John Tkesilian, Walworth, PniLPOT. KING. What must we dol the danger grows more imminent — The mob increases — PHILPOT. Every njoraent brings Fresh tidings of our peril. KING. It were well To yield them what the}' ask. ARCHBISHOP. Aye, (hat ray liege Were politic. Go boldly forth to meet them. Grant all they ask — however wild and ruinous — Mean iimc tiie troops you have already sum- moned. Will gather round them. Then my Christian' power Absolves you of your promise. WALWORTH. Were but their ringleaders cut ofif — the rabble Would soon disperse. PHILPOT. United in a mass There's nothing can resist theiu — once divide them And they will fall an easy sacrifice. ARCHBISHOP. Lull them by promises — bespeak them fair — Go forth, my liege — spare not, if need requires A solemn oath, to ratify the treaty. KING. I dread their fury. ARCHBISHOP. 'Tis a needless dread, There is divinity about your person ; It is the sacred privilege of Kings, Howe'erthey act, to render no account To man. The people have been taught this lesson. Nor can they soon forget it. KING. I will go — I will submit to every thing they ask ; My daj- of triumph will arrive at last. (Shouts mithout.) Enter Messenger. MESSENGER. Tlie mob are at the city gates. ARCHBISHOP. Haste, haste. Address them ere too late. I'll remain here. For they detest me much. (Shouts again) Enter another Messenger. MESSENGER. The Londoners have opened the city gates. The rebels are admitted. KING. Fear then must give me courage ; my Lord Mayor, Come you with me. (Exeunt. Shouts tcilliout.) SCENE — SSI ITH FIELD. Wat Tyler, John Ball, Piers, kc. Mob. PIERS. So far triumphant are we ; how these nobles, These petty 'tyrants, who so long oppressed us. Shrink at tlie first resistance ! HOB. They were powerful. Only because we fondly thought them so. Where is Jack Straw 1 TYLER. Jack Straw is gone to the Tower To seize the king and so to eiul resistance. JOHN BALL. It was well judged ; fain would I spare the shedding Of human blood ; gain we that royal puppet. And all will follow fairly; deprived of him, 2 10 WAT tyler; The nobles lose their pretext, nor will dare Rebel against the people's majesty'. Enter Herald. HERALD. Richard the Second, by the grace of God, Of England, Ireland, France and Scotland, King, And of the town of Berw ick- uponTweed, Would parley with AVat Tyler. TYLER. Let him know Wat Tyler is in Sinithfield. (Exit Herald.) I will parley With this young monarch ; as he comes to me Trusting my honour, -on your lives I charge you Let none attempt to harm him. JOHN BALL, The faith of courts Is hut a weak dependence ; You are honest — And better is it even to die the victim Of credulous honesty, than live preserved By the cold policy that still sus])ects. En^cr King, WALw(iRTn, Philpot, &c. KING. I would speak to thee, Wat Tyler, bid the mob Retire awhile. PIERS. Nay, do not go alone — Let me attend you. TYLER. Wherefore should I fear ? Am I not armed with a just cause? — retire. And I will boldly plead the cause of Freedom. (Advances.) - KING. Tyler, why have you killed my officer ; And led my honest subjects from their homes, Thus to rebel against the Lord's anointed ? TYLER. Because they were oppress'd. KING. Was fliis the way To remedy the ill ! you should have tried By milder means — petition'd at the throne — The throne will always listen to petitions. J'YLER. King of England, Petitioning for pity is most weak. The sovereign people ought to Qemand justice. I kill'd your officer, for his lewd hand Insulted a maid's modesty ; your subjects 1 lead to rebel against the Lord's anointed. Because his ministers have made him odious ; His yoke is heavy, and his burden grievous. Why do we carry on this fatal war, To force upon the French a king they hale ; Tearing our young men from their peaceful homes ; Forcing his hard earned fiiiits from the honest peasant Distressing us to desolate our neighbours ; Win' is this ruinous poll-tax imposed. But to support your court's extravagance. And your mad title to the crown of France 1 Shall we sit tamely down beneath these evils Petitioning for pity ? King of England ! Why are we sold like cattle in your markets — Deprived of every privilege of man? Must we lie tamely at our tyrants feet. And like your spaniels, lick the hand that beats us ? You sit at ease in your gay palaces. The costly banquet courts your appetite. Sweet music soothes your slumbers; we the while, Scarce by hard toil can earn a little food. And sleep scarce sheltered from the cold night wind : Whilst your wild projects wrest the little from us Which might have cheered the wintry hour of age ; 1 he Parliament for ever asks more money : We toil and sweat for money for your taxes; Where is the benefit, what food reap we From all the councils of your governn)ent ; lliink you that we should quarrel with the French ! What boots to us your victories, j'our glory ? We pay, we fight, you profit at your ease. Do you not claim the country as your own ? Do you not call the venison of the forest. The birds of heaven your own? prohibiting us Even tho' in want of food, to seize the prey Which nature otfers ! — King ! is all this just? Think you we do not feel the wrongs we suffer ? The hour of retribution is at hand, And tyrants tremble — mark me, king of En- gland. WALWORTH. (Comes behind him, and stabs him.) Insolent rebel, threatening the King! PIERS. Vengeance ! vengeance ! HOB. Seize the King. A DRAMATIC POEM. 11 KING. I must be bold. (Advancing.) M^- friends and loving subjects, I will grant all you ask ; you shall be free — The ta\ shall be repealed — ail. all vou ^vish. Your leader menaced me, he deserved his fate- Quiet your angers ; on my royal word Your grievances shall all be done away. Your vassalage abolished. — A free pardon AUow'd to all ; so help me God it shall be. JOHN BALL. ^ Revenge, mj- brethren, beseems not Christians. Send us these terujs sign'd with your seal of state We will await in peace ; deceive us not. — Act justly, so to excuse your late foul deed. The charter sha nour, All shall be justly done KING. be drawn out on mine ho- ACT in. SCEN E SMITHFIELn. PIERS, (meeting John Bai.l.^ You look disturbed my father ? JOHN BALL. Piers, I am so. Jack Straw has forced the Tower ; seized the Archbishop, And beheaded him. PIERS. The curse of insurrection ! JOHN BALL. Aye, Piers ! our nobles level down their vas- sals — Keep thetn at endless labourlike their brutes, Degrading every facuhy by servitude ; Repressing all the energy of mind. ^Vo must not wonder'then, that like wild beasts, When they have hurst thcirchains, with brutal rage They revenge them on their tyrants. PIERS. This Archbishop ! He was oppressive to his humble vassals ; Pr ditto, common edition . . The Theological Works of T.Paine. in bds. 8vo. 8s. may be had in 24 mo, in four parts stitched at 6d. Is. 9d, and 6d. ; and in bds. with portrait and vignette at Observations on Dr. Gregory's Let- ters, by R. Carlile An Address to Men of Science, by R. Carlile • • • Lawrence's Lectures on Physiology, Zoology, and the Natural History of Man Analysis of the Influence of Natural Religion on the Temporal Hap- piness of Mankind Critical remarks on the truth and harmony of the four Gospels . The Deist, volume 1.2 &3 . . . . Israel Vindicated Ecce Homo ; or a Critical Enquiry into the life of Christ Life of St. Paul by Boulanger .... The Doubts of Infidels ....'... Watson Refuted The Christian Mystery The God of the Jews, or Jehovah Unveiled Thoughts on the Inconsistency of Religious Persecution Christianity Unveiled by Boulanger The Life of David A Letter to the Rev. Dr. Chandler, by the writer of the Life of David Cain, A dramatic poem by Lord Byron :. • • • The Vision of Judgment, by Lord Byron Gibbon'sProgress and Establishment of the Cliristian Religion .... Saul, a Drama, by Voltaire • • • • Characters of a Soldier, Priest, Peer, Jew Books and Christian Mysteries, each . . Toldoth Jesu, or the Gospel accor- ding to the Jews The first day's proceedings of the trial of Richard Carlile containing the Age of Reason complete . . . Trial of Mrs. Carlile The two Trials of M. A. Carlile Trial of Mrs. Wright Speech of Mrs. Wright Trials of Humphrey Boyle and Joseph Rhodes , Trial of W. V. Holme? s. d. 2 24 24 12 4 2 6 1 14 4 3 36 2 6 10 1 6 1 2 6 1 6 3 6 1 6 2 2 6 6 3 1 2 6 63 64 1 65 6 2 6 66 1 6 67 1 68 6 69 36. 37. 38, 39. 40, 41. 42, 43, 44. 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52. 53. 54. 55, 56. 57, 58. 59. 60. 61. 62, adulation. Trials of Campion and others ... 2 Trial of James Watson Trial of William Tunbridgc .... Trials of all the persons prosecuted for assisting Mr. Carlile in Lon- don, in bds ,,.12 The true Meaning of the System of Nature, by Helveiius 1 Toulmin's Antiquity and Duration of the World . ." , 1 Ditto Eternity of the Universe . . , 1 Diderot's Thoughts on Religion with a Sketch of his Life and Writings The New Trial of the Witnesses , . 2 Child of Nature, a poem ...... Hammon's Letters to Dr. Priestley 1 Le Bon Sens, or the good Sense of the Cure Mcslier, in bds. . 5 St. Peter's Holiday Priestcraft Exposed, . . • , . . . A table of the ])ersons who have opposed superstition by their wri- tings or speeches. On fine paper 9d. on common paper Portraits of Thomas Paine, Elihu Palmer, Rev. Robert Taylor, and Richard Carlile, at various prices. Print of the Bible God 1 Print of the Manchester Massacre, coloured 5s. plain John Clarke's Letters to Dr. Adam Clarke, in boards 3 The Koran in bds 7 Review of Rennel's remarks on Scepticism 2 Life of Thomas Paine by Clio Rick- man \ 7 By W. T. . Sherwin 7 By R, Carlile , and for the purpose of gratuitous distribution Palmer's Principles of Nature, stitched 8vo 3 ditto 32mo 2 Works in bds, with portrait 5 Every Man's book; or, What is God ? 1 Every Woman's Book ; or. What is Love An abridged edition of" Every Wo- man's Book" for cheap and gratu- itous distribution Queen Mab, a philosophical Poem, with Notes 2 . , 2 . . 2 d. 6 6 9 6 ? 6 6 6 1 1 6 3 6 6 1 6 .Innett Free Enquirer by P. Janus on Sion Frerct's Letter from Thrasybulus to Leucippe Aphorisms, opinions, and reflections, from the writings of Thomas Paine Lives of the persons who have writ- ten against superstition, in Nos. at Killing no Murder 2 Bosquetian Creed 6 6 2 6 THE .^ PRINCIPLES OF GOVERNMENT ; IN A DIALOGUE BETWEEN A SCHOLAR AND A PEASANT. By Sir WILLIAM JONES. LONDON: PRINTED AND PUBLISHED BY RICHARD CARLILE, 62, FLEET-STREET. 1831. Price One Penny. S»lu bj Ts. FiiiUy. 30. Haddington Plac«, Ltti\h Walk, Cdinbui'gb. THE PRINCIPLES OF GOVERNMENT; A Dialogue. BETWEEN A SCHOLAR AND A PEASANT. Peasant. Why should humble men, like me, sign or set marks lo petitions of this uature? It is better for us peasants to mind our husbandry, and leave what we cannot comprehend to the King- and Parliament. Scholar. You can comprehend more than you imagine ; and, as a free member of a free state, have higher things to mind than you may conceive. P. Mhyfree you mean out of prison, I hope to continue so, as long as I can pay my rent to the 'Squire's Bailiff; but what is meant by a. free state ? S. Tell me first what is meant by a club in a village, of which I know you to be a member. P. It is an assembly of men, who meet after work every Satur- day to be merry and happy for a few hours in the week. S. Have you no other object but mirth ? P. Yes ; we have a box, into which we contribute equally from our monthly or weekly savings, and out of which any mem- bers of the club are to be relieved in sickness or poverty : for the parish officers are so cruel and insolent, that it were better to starve than to apply to them for relief. S. Did they, or the 'Squire, or the parson or all together, com- pel you to form this society ? P. Oh! no — we would not be compelled; we formed it by our own choice. S. You did right — But have you not some head or president of your club ? P. The master for each night is chot^en by all the company present the week before. S. Does he make laws to bind you iii case of ill temper or mis- behaviour r 4 P. He make laws ! — He bind us I — No ; we have all agreed to a set of rules, which are signed by every new comer, and were written in a strange hand, by young Spelman, the lawyer's clerk, whose uncle is a member. S. What should you do, if any one member were to insist on becoming- perpetual master, and on altering- your rules at his arbitrary will and pleasure ? P. We should expel him. /S. What if he were to bring- a Serjeant's g-uard, when the militia are quartered in your neig-hbourhood, and insist upon your obeying- him ? P. We should resist, if we could ; if not, the society would be broke up. /S. Suppose that, with his Serjeant's g-uard, he were to take the money out of the box or out of your pockets ? P. Would not that be a robbery ? S. I am seeking- information from you. How should you act on such an occasion ? P. We should submit, perhaps, at the time; but should after- wards try to apprehend the robbers. S. What if you could not apprehend them ? P. We might kill them, 1 should think; and, if the King- would not pardon us, our consciences would. /S. How could you either apprehend them, or, if they resisted, kill them, without a sufficient force in your own hands ! P. Oh ! we are all g-ood players at sing-le stick, and each of us has a stout cudg-el or quarter-staff in the corner of his room. 5^. Suppose, that a few of the club were to domineer over the rest, and insist upon making- laws for them ? P, We must take the same course ; except that it would be easier to restrain one man than a number ; but we should be the majority, with justice on our side. S. A word or two on another head. Some of you, I presume, are no accountants. P. Few of us understand accounts ; but we trust old Lilly, the schoolmaster, whom we believe to be an honest man; and he keeps the key of our box. /S. If your money should in time amount to a larg-e sum, it might not perhaps be safe, to keep it at his house, or in any pri- vate house ? P. Where else should we keep it ? S. You mig-ht choose to put it into the funds, Op to lend it to the 'Squire, who has lost so much money at Newmarket, taking- liis bond or some of his fields as your security for the pay^ with interest. P. We must in that case confide in young- Spelman, who will soon set up for himself ; and, if a lawyer can be honest, will be an honest lawyer. «S. What power do you g-ive to Lilly, or should you give to Spelman, in the case supposed ? P. No power. We should give them both a due allowance for their trouble, and should expect a faithful account of all they had done for us. 5. Honest men may change their nature. What, if both or either of them were to deceive you ? P. We should remove them, put our trust in better men, and try to repair our loss. S. Did it never occur to you, that every State or Nation was only a great club ? P. Nothing ever occurred to me on the subject ; for I never thought about it. S. Though you never thought before on the subject, yet you may be able to tell me why you suppose men to have assembled, and to have formed nations, communities, or states, which all mean the same thing ? P. In order, I should imagine, to be as happy as they can while they live. S. By happy do you mean merry only ? P. To be as merry as they can without hurting themselves or their neighbours, but chiefly to secure themselves from danger, and to relieve their wants. S. Do you believe that any King or Emperor compelled them so to associate ? P. How could one man compel a multitude ? A King or an Emperor, I should presume, is not born with an hundred hands. /S. When a Prince of the blood shall in any country be so dis- tinguished by nature, 1 shall then, and then only, conceive him to be ^ greater man than you. But might not an army, with a King or General at their head, have compelled them to assemble? P. Yes ; but the army must have been formed by their own choice. One man, or a few, can never govern many without their consent. 6 S. Suppose, liovvevcr, Umt. a multitude of men, assembled in a town or city, were to choose a King- or Governor, might they not give him power or authority ? P. To be sure ; but they would never be so mad. 1 hope, as to g-ive him a power of making- their laws, S. Who else should make them? P. The ivholc Nation or People. -S. What if they disagreed ? P. The opinion of the greater number, as in our village clubs, must be taken, and prevail. S. What could be do.ne, if the society were so large, that all could not meet in the same place? P. A greater number must choose a less. S. Who shall be the choosers? P. All who are not upon the parish. In our club, if- a maa asks relief of the overseer, he ceases to be one of us,- because he must depend on the overseer. S. Could not a few men, one in seven for instance, chuse the assembly of law-makers as well as a larger number ? P. As conveniently, perhaps ; but I would not suffer any man to choose another, who was to make laws, by which my money or my life might be taken from me. S. Have you a. freehold in any county of forty shillings a-year ? P. I have nothing in the world but my cattle, implements of husbandry, and household goods, together with my farm, for which 1 pay a fixed rent to the 'Squire. 5. Have you a vote, then, in any city or borough ? P. I have no vote at all ; but am able by my honest labour to support my wife and four children ; and whilst 1 act honestly, 1 may defy the laws. S. Can you be ignorant, that the Parliament, to which mem- bers are sent by this county^ and by the next market town, have power to make new laws, by which you and your fami'y may be stripped of your goods, thrown into prison, and even d prived of life ? P. A dreadful power 1 I never made inquiries, having business of my own, concerning the business of Parliament; but imagined that the laws had been fixed for many hundred years. S. The common laws, to which you refer, are equal, just, and humane; but the King and Parliament may alter them when they please. p. The King- ought therefore to be a g-ood man, and the Par- liament to consist of men equally good. S. The King alone can do no harm ; but who must judg-e the goodness of Parliament-men ? P. All those whose property, freedom, and lives may be affected by their laws. S. Yet six men in seven, who inhabit this kingdom, have, like you, no votes ; and the petition, which I desired you to sign, has nothing for its object but the restoration of you all to the right of choosing those law-makers, by whom your money or your lives may be taken from you. Attend vvhile 1 read it distinctly. P. Give me your pen — I never wrote my name, ill as it may- be written, with greater eagerness.. S. I applaud you, and trust that your example will be followed by millions. Another word before we part. Recollect your opinion about the club in the village, and tell what ought to be the consequence, if the King alone were to insist on making laws, or in altering them at his will and pleasure. P. He, too, must be expelled. S. Oh ! but think of his standing army, and of the militia, which now are his in substance, though ours in form. P. If he were to employ that force against the Nation, they would and ought to resist him, or the State would cease to be a State. S. What if the great accountants and great lawyers, the Liliys and Spelmans of the Nation, were to abuse their trust, and cruelly injure, instead of faithfully serving, the public ? P. We must request the King to remove them, and make triai of others ; but none should implicitly be trusted. S. But what, if a few great Lords, or wealthy men, were to keep the men in subjection, yet exert his force, lavish his treasure, and misuse his name, so as to domineer over the People, and manage the Parliament ? P. We must fight for the King and for ourselves. S. You talk of fighting, as if you were speaking of some rustic engagement at a wake ; but your quarter-staffs would avail you little against bayonets. P. We might easily provide ourselves with better arms. S. Not so easily: when the moment of resistance came, you would be deprived of all arms j and those who should furnish you with them, or exhort you to take them up, would be called traitors, and probably put to death. 8 P. We ought always, therefore, to be ready ; and keep each of us a strong- firelock in the corner of his bed-room. S. That would be legal as well as rational. Are you, my honest friend, provided with a musket ? P. I will contribute no more to the club, and purchase a fire- lock with my saving's. and frying limbK.and who could only be appeased by this perpetual teusr of the priests! Such are the laws, such is the God unfolded in this " blessed book !" It is an outrage upon the present state of knowledge and comparative civilization that this book should be supported by laws, and propagated by associations and subscriptions. The persecu- tions which now exist in defence of this book exceed those of all former times in hypocrisy and viilany, because science has made such a progress as to pronounce the whole a string of lies, and has rendered it impossible for an intelligent man to give it honest and conscientious credence. In the present day, it has no moral support, and is kept in countenance only by force and fraud. It is the last remnant of priestly magic, and the last prop of all the temples of idolatry. Its annihilation as a creed and a code must be the wish, as it will be the aim of all good men and women. Reader, if thou hast a Bible, refer to the following Chapters and Verses. OIH C00tamettt, Genesis Leviticus . . Numbers . . Deuteronomy Judges ciUP . VER. CHAP, VER. 16 M to 16 Judges . . . . 21 1 25 19 8 36 1 Samuel . . . 25 1 44 20 1 18 2 Samuel . . . 11 1 27 30 14 18 13 1 39 34 1 31 - 16 20 23 35 22 1 Kings • . . . 11 1 4 38 8 30 2 Kings . . . . 9 8 39 7 18 Esther .... . 3 4 15 15 33 Songs of Solomon 1 to8 18 1 30 Ezekiei . . . . 4 1 17 20 1 27 16 1 63 25 6 8 22 9 12 31 17 85 23 1 49 22 13 30 Hosea .... . 1 1 11 231,13,17,18 2 1 23 19 1 30 3 1 25 CHAP. VER. . Epistle of Paul to the Romans 1 25, 26, 27, 28. First Epistle to Timothy . . .5 11. Chapters to be read by all humane, moral, and reflecting Persons, both Male and Female. i^lQ ^t^umeitt. Genesis , . 34 1 Samuel Numbers . , . 31 2 Samuel Joshua , 8, 10 1 Kings Judges • . 4,5,20,21- 2 Kings . 5 12,21 . 2 . 10 vSKETCH CF THE HISTORY OF ONE GOD. Introduction. This history is to be confined to the one God of the Deists, of the Unitarians, or Christians generally ; of the Mahometans; of the Jews; of Plato and Socrates, and such Greeks as confined them- selves to one God; of the American Indians; of the Chinese; and of every nation where one God has had a predominant wor- ship. The Christians, and many others here included, have in reality, more than one God ; but they speak of one as pre-emi- nent, and of that one we shall see what can be said. Section I. God is a word for which we have no prototype or sign among the things which we see or know to exist. But, to this word, great, even the greatest, powers are attributed, and some men have adopted it as a general cloak for their ignorance. In dif- ferent countries, it has existed under difi'erent names, such as Deus, Zeus, Theos, Jupiter, Jove, Jehovah, Jahouh, Jao, Fot, Bel, Brama, Sojnmonocodorn, Osiris, Thor, Thot, El, Elohiyn, A I, Allah, with a thousand others, and that we interpret as the Great Spirit of the American Indians. All nations have meant one and the same thing, by their diflPerent words, namely a personification of their own ignorance. And all have been ido- lators, or there have been no idolaters. The common meaning of the word is the expression of all that does exist, the all, and it appears that the English word all is a correct expression of the name of the common deity, and very like in sound to EI, Al, Allah. I am that I am; I am all that ever was or ever shall be, no mortal has yet dared to lift my veil;* I am alpha and omega; • I have dared and will dare to do it. 6 I am the beginning and llie ending; Life; soul; spirit; exist- ence; nature; matter; are all names, or the best description that can be given of this common deity: and all express nothing more than the ignorance of mankind, of what we now call matter or the elements of matter. They were not chemists, William Allen finds more of his God in his laboratory than else- where. It is there he obtains the most correct knowledge of Deity. His crucible forms his best Bible, and his best religion is his profession as a chemist. Section IL Sun-worship, though simple Theism, must have been a prior worship to that of matter, the great whole, as the worship of a specific powerful object, at a time, when other planetary bodies were rated as to importance according to their apparent size. It was comparatively the work of art, science, and civilization, to form an idea of a God embracing the powers of matter. It appears common among the Chinese, through all their records. It was evidently embraced throughout Asia, as far as we have re- cords. In the earliest history of Egypt, and other parts of Africa, we have proofs that the then mind of mankind was in those parts exercised upon the subject of a powerful Deity. Many sculptured remains bear proof of this. Indeed, we need not search for proofs of that, to which the common sense of mankind will ever bear witness. The Jews, Christians, and Mahometans had no original God revealed to them. They were mere copyists, and corrupt ones, of the labours and decisions of men of former ages. Section III. When an intelligent God was imagined, it was necessary to find him some external location as a dwelhng-place, and thus arose the idea of a heaven. The American Indians have it on the other side of a high blue mountain. The Greeks had it on the top of Olympus, their highest moun- tain. The writer of the Jew Books does not appear to have con- fined himself to the top or side of a mountain, he has crystalized the atmosphere of the earth and placed his Lord God above it.* The Christian adheres to something of this notion, only, unlucki- • There is an exception where Jehovah is brought on Mount Sinai and to dwell in the 8rk, iabernacle, temple, &c, 'J lie Bible was the work of tiitferent men, and each had his notions of God and his dwelling place. Jehovah on JMount Si- nai is but another Jupiter on Mount Olympus. Jehovah in the ark, tabernacle, or temple of the Israelites is but another Pagan mjistery. Ceres had lier ark : and the bearing of an r.rk that contained a god was a very ancient and very common Pau-an ceremony. The Israelilish story on this head is but a copy from those of other tribes or nations. ly, for him of the present day, the telescope has extended his ideas, and has sent him a long way off, to a place, the boundary of which is not in sight, for his heaven; while some of them are so humble, as to talk of making the present earth, with a few re- pairs, a filling up of holes and a removing of projections, a little painting and whitewashing, answer the put pose of their future heaven. Thus man, and not the Lord, created the heaven and all things that are therein. Section IV. There is one thing to be said in favour of the Jewish religion, the Jews have made no hell. They were cruel to their enemies while living ; but, in putting them to death, their cruelty did not extend to finding them a place of perpetual torment. This divine and religious disposition has originated with the Christians, from whom the Mahometans have copied it. Section V. Some nations have reduced their God to an image. This has been common throughout Asia and Africa, and though the more ignorant part of the community might have attributed virtues to the figure, as the Christians do to acrucifix, the more sensible part deemed it but an emblem of power. The purpose of figures of this kind is apt to meet perversion, abuses creep in everywhere, but the motive might not have been bad, that first deified a power and then reduced it to a figure. The mischief began when the priest joined the project. Section VI. Temples followed the establishment of the priesthood; sacri- fices of animals and vegetables, fruit, wine, and oil, were declared necessary for the God; but intended as food or riotous living for the priest. Human labour became taxed to support the God, and religion became a most extensive evil. The first deification was the origin of moral evil, and the extinction of the last God will remove it. CONCLUSION. In this epitome of the history of the common God of mankind, it will not be well to enter into all the wanderings of human error, to describe religious ceremonies. This must be reserved for a larger work. It must here suffice to shew, that the Jews, Christians, and Mahometans have no original revelation upon the 8 subject ; that there has been a common notion among mankind upon the subject of one God, or one most powerful God ; that such a notion is erroneous, and that neither antiquity nor num- bers can preserve it against the researches of this age displayed by free discussion. Men are every where the same ; their Gods are every where the same, and if their notions had not been alike erroneous, there could not have been a succession. The one true God, if there had been a true God, would have triumphed over all others, or never have permitted their existence. They are all so many errors of the hu- man imagination, that imagineth vain things and runneth after that which is marvellous. There are phenomena in matter : but there is nothing marvellous, as far as it can be explained ; and what cannot be explained should not be deemed marvellous. We should confess our ignorance and patiently wait for it while we industriously seek improvement. The history of God is no farther the history of a reality than error or frailty is a reality. We must acquire knowledge, and error will vanish. Uniform with this are published, price Tivopence each, The CHARACTER of a PRIEST. SOLDIER. . PEER. the CHRISTIAN MYSTERIES. JEW BOOKS. N. B. The Character of the Bible and References to the im- moral parts of the Bible are printed on a leaf, and may be had for One Halfpenny. Printed and Published b^r R. Carlile, 62, Fleet-street. Tnii CHAHACTER OF A P E E R; BY PIIILANTIIROPOS. iiontron : PRINTED AND PUnLISIIED BY R. CARLILE, 55, FLEET- STREET. 1821. Price Twope?ice. THE CHARACTER OF A PEER. Although the Deity for wise purposes has created different races of men, with organizations that adapt them to different regions of the earth : spme for the torrid and some for the frigid zone, yet he has not created any gradation of rank among the same race, there is no natural division denoting superior and inferior, master or slave, labourer or idler; all have the same powers of body, the same capacities of mind, excited by the same wants, and gratified by the same enjoyments. If there is a difference of physical force, of mental acquirement, of intellectual vigour, they are owing to acquired causes, to the operation of collateral agents, to some traceable action; Nature equally generous, equally bountiful, has no favourites, no preference ; she neither exalts one nor depresses another ; the elementary arrangements of Nature are similar; order or variation, exactness or change she impartially embraces; the stature of the Elephant, the agility of the Squirrel, and subtlety of the Mon- key, are distinguishing, incapable of confusion ; when Nature wishes to separate, she creates marks of dis- tinction ; when &he wishes to confuse, she assimilates to identity. Having the power of distinction, possessing the elements of separation, the essence of difference, we would see it manifested when necessary, introduced when wanted. In the operations of Nature we see constancy, inflexibility, uniformity ; we see no change independent of foreign action and specific essence or wise ends ; equal to intentions, careful to denote them, to characterize them, had she intended such animals as Kings, or Dukes, or Lords, to decorate her creation, she would have distinctly marked them ; they would have been covered with stars and garters, and rib- bons, glittering, brilliant, and splendid ; they would have been born with superior intellect, perfect with- out application, without labour, without toil; they would have been born with a vigorous- body, exempt from sickness, from infirmity, from preternatural de- cay, and probably, as the choicest of the choice, bless- ed with perennial youth. Endowed with such faculties, with such powers, with such distinctions, who could have questioned, who could have resisted, who could have denied, the superiority of such animals as Kings, and Dukes, and Counts over man ; have they those marks of distinc- tion? have they those marks of superiority? have they those proofs of divinity? Oh! no, they neither differ in shape, in organization, nor in mind, they neither excel in health, nor in strength, nor in wisdom, nor in longevity; there is no difference, no separation, no distinction, no superiority between Lords and Slaves ; the Peer is not the creation of matter but of man ; he is not created by honesty, because honesty is inseparable from nature, but by dishonesty, by fraud, ^ by hypocrisy, and by villainy, usurping the rights of Nature inseparable from man. Men stimulated by avarice and actuated by tyran- ny, planned personal aggrandizement ; for vain marks of distinction they created titles to conceal the fraud, they assumed individual superiority ; professed to be more than men, assumed the name given to God, professed to be demi-Gods, holding the destiny of men; the men of wealth and power combined, fraud cemented a conspiracy against the people, they form- ed coalitions to deprive the people of the right of Nature, to deprive them of their liberty and property, by rapine, by treachery, and by usurpation ; the ban- ditti of military robbers placed at its head a King, a Chief, a Captain of the Gang, sometimes with and sometimes without a bauble upon his head. All the underlings, every individual, every atom of the horde of robbers had a nick-name, or participated in the public plunder, or both formidable in numbers and in desperation they overawed, they seduced, or be- trayed all opposition ; villainy triumphed over justice, lead her captive, destroyed her; in some places re- action has taken place, but, too generally, the tyrants, the impostors, and the conspirators rule. William landed in England from Normandy, he brought with him an immense horde of plunderers, of freebooters, of legalized and licensed murderers. He came on purpose to rob and murder wholesale. He slew the King, defeated the soldiers, murdered the people, seized the country and carved it out among his gang with the sword ; he gave the slices among his followers, according to the aid they had given, the largest piece to the greatest villain, and so 6 on in proportion to the rest of his banditti ; the Arch- murderer and plunderer gave to his banditti on con- ditions, viz. in knight-service, in wardship, in homage and fealty, in capite, in grand-serjeantry, and in soc- age, thus reserving to himself out of baronies and manors a revenue and assistance ; and the lord again from his vassals, tenants, copy-holders, &c. who paid in suit and service. William was one of the most cruel^ vindictive, ar- bitrary, and barbarous tyrants that ever reigned in England ; he associated with none, he preferred none, he valued none, but such as were effective agents in his pillage, in his midnight assassinations, and his pub- lic murders. Although the Captain of the Banditti seized all the property of our forefathers, and bedewed his hands in their blood, the law has been so prostituted, and the lawyers so servile, as to declare *' that all lands are holden of the crown mediately or immediately \' The profession cannot be more degraded than by making the assertion — or a public more insulted by slavish sycophants. As the nobility are chiefly of William's introduc- tion from Normandy or the descendants of such as were ennobled ~, so the present race are the offspring of that conqueror, his coadjutors, his assassins, and his ketches ; the descendants of the banditti are still in the fraudulent possession of the property of our ancestors; they are gay, they are splendid, they are ' Vide Sir Henry Spelman's Works, and Lord Bacon's. * Eighty-three Enghsh Baronets say they can trace their pater- nal ancestry to the g-eneral robbery, vulgarly called the con- (5|uest!!! even insolent at the expense of people now poor who were plundered of their patrimony. The real owners of mansions, of manors, or districts may be in penury, in pauperism, or in workhouses ; if the tyranny, the rapine and the insolence of the aristocracy ended with mere occupation, there might be less objection, but all the rapacity of manorial rights, and the outrageous disposition of game-laws are inexorably enforced; there is no degeneration, no leniency, no relaxation, no indulgence, manifested by those feudal tyrants ; they possess all the arbitrary, brutal, vindictive malignancy of their ancestors ; there are few instances of reform, or repentance, among the nobility of this country ; the ignorance, the bar- l^arism, the bloody-mindedness have descended with the usurped estates from the general robbery. The Peers pride themselves on the antiquity of their families ; (is any family more modern ?) let them re- vert to the general robbery, when their ancestors plundered our forefathers of their estates, assassinated or exiled them, they are welcome to go back to a Jonathan Wild or a Robin Hood : thev have no occasion to treat the people with contempt, they have no occasion to treat the people with contumely, and to sneer at their ignorance and distress, when the robbery and subsequent injustice produced it; when their forefathers robbed by privilege of the sword and robbed with impunity, and they have the impu- dence to keep possession of the plunder ; not one of the hereditary estates of the aristocracy has been gained by fair means, but by extortion, by swindling, and plundering the public. Instead of the old nobility of England being of the 8 most illustrious origin and accumulating splendour in their descent, as fools and rogues assert ; they have sprung from public murderers^ wholesale devastators and freebooters ; the first creation has been rivalled in posterity, in infamy, perfidy, rapine and tyranny ; being more fortunate than pirates, buccaniers and corsairs. TJie successful villain is ennobled, the unsucess- ful ignohled. The Nobility may be defined, props of the throne and plunderers of the people ; the Trinket Man w^as the creator, and is still the chief of the gang of ma- rauders ; there is an implied partnership between the King and Nobility; each are participators in the spoil, and connive at the operations of each other upon the pockets of the people. In conclusion it may be observed, Firstly, that Na- ture knows no such animal as Duke, or Earl, or Count; and Secondly, the order of the Nobility was not created by the people, but instituted and sup- ported by regal tyrants, to aid, assist, abet, coun- tenance, justify, and protect them in villainy. THE END. Just Published, from the same Author. The CHARACTERS of a SOLDIER and a PRIEST. Price Twopence each. Printed and Published by Pi. CARTJLE, 55, Fleet Street. Zi)t §:ttont:i CS&itiom THE CHARACTER OF A PRIEST: BY PHTLANTHROPOS PRINTED AND PUBLISHED BY R. CARLILE, 55, FLEET STREET. 1822. Price Twopence. THE CHARACTER OF A PRIEST. Nature pregnant with equality, with justice, and gene- rosity, has given all men the same organization, the same functions, the same powers; she has neiiher created higher uor lower, superior nor interior, master nor slave; inequality would imply monopoly; monopoly, partiality; and par- tiality, divine injustice; all ihe operations of Nature are simple, just, equitable, and invariable: nothing is done at random, nothing is effected by chance, nothing is the result of uncertain laws. The operations of Nature, the physical laws of men and of morality are as uniform as the revolu- tions of the solar system ; every action is consistent with the essence of the acting body; nothing can act inconsistently with its elements. All Nature acts in conformity with universal laws; man forms an integral part of Nature, and must act in unison with his elements; the laws of Nature are beyond human controul, they are independent of man, unchangeable by any power less than the Contriver; the laws of Nature are neither arrested, interrupted, biassed, or controverted by venal, bigoted, fanatical Priests. A Priest has the same essence, is composed of the same elements, endowed with the same organization as other men; he has no more natural command, no greater power, no greater right; Priests do not come into the world with crosiers, or with mitres, or with rosaries; the revolutions of matter create and destroy them; they are decomposed as a cow or a cabbage. It is not Nature, but the folly of man that has given cousequrncr to the Priest; all the wealth, all the advaufomont, all Ihe i)ower the Priests enjoy, are ac- quired by hypocrisy, by perjury, by extortion, and by swindling; the traile is founded in fraud, in blasphemy, and impiety; matured by cupidity, by venality, and by masked villainy. The ini[)ostor pretends to have exclusive access to exclusive favour from the Deity. It is by inflexible truth, by the invariable laws of Na- ture, that the impostor will be analyzed; bring him to the shrine of reason, denude him of his robes, of his mask, of his hypocrisy, he is not more than man by Nature, but worse by morality, inasmuch as he is covered by infamous of- fences; however intention may operate, however simplicity may be deluded, there cannot be one honest, one indepen- dent, and one intelligent man among tlie whole body of Priests; bigots bv^ education, dishonest by trade, ignorant of the first principles of science, they must necessarily be superstitious, cruel, and vindictive; whatever purity, what- ever humility, whatever candour, the Priest may profess, is resolvable into individual interest; he has no parent but avarice, no God but money. Although the Evangelists, the Priests, the sacred impostors, are similar by nature, similarly educated in chicane and hypocrisy, they do not agree in any one religious profession: the Bonzes, the Muf- tis, and the Priests, have different churches, different Gods, different creeds. Religious impostors uniformly coincide in plundering the people; there is no other symptom of simi- larity, no atom of cohesion, but rapine, among Priests : God is mHde something and nothing, everywhere and no where; he is one thing at Ispahan, another at Constantino- ple, and a third at Rome; what is religion at one place, is blasphemy at another. If truth v»as as mutable, as liable to change, as subject to variation, as the dogmas of Priests, conflicting opinions would act to mutual destruction. God, acting always through Nature, always by universal and self-evident laws, would not permit a thousand sects of ignorant, profane, impious, blaspheming Priests, to mislead, impoverish, and barbarize the people. If God manifested himself through the medium of Priests, of churches, and of creeds, it would be by means as self-evident as universal, and as candid and invariable as the rotations of the solar system ; it would not be by starvation at one hour, and gluttony at another; or kneeling, tenths, pilgrimages, exorcisms, sprinklings, crosses., sacraments, ablutions, circumcision, and gibberish. i) Religion is a matter of imagiuation, of fiction, an hypo- thesis, and not of fact : the multifarious dogmas of secta- rians, demonstrates the multiplicity of vapours and con- jectures ; while men reason from false principles, religions will multiply to iutinity. Philosophers have only one God — the God of Nature; but roguish Priests, old women and fools have an endless number; every arch-impostor has profanely made a God of his own ; Priesily genius, preg- nant with extortion, and cogitating more effectually to pick pockets, with his own new trap, than with the stale tool of other men, has given rise to a multitude of diurnal Deities. If we witnessed as many variations in the laws of Nature as in the Priest-trade, the Priests might insist that some at- tention should be given to the business of fraud and cant. Every Priest diifers from every other Priest, and all differ from' the truth ; the Deity does not operate by stealth, he does not work clandestinely in holes and corners, as the miracle-mongers attest, but generally, openly, in the face of day, before all the world, in his works: he does not skulk in mosques, in churches, or in wildernesses, but is equally- every where ; he knows no more of the cross, the crescent, or the crosier, than he does of a tobacco-pipe, a mile-post, or a broom-stick. If there is one man more wicked than another it is the impostor, and the lying, cheating Priest — the misleader of innocent, inoffensive, unsuspecting men ; the more the Priests profess to believe, the greater is the iniquity, and impiety, and hypocrisy — the more religion they believe, the less morality l»hey practise. The people should believe the Priests when they profess principles con- sistent with Nature, and scorn them when thej claim belief in inconceivable and false enigmas ; attention is to be given when assertion is demonstrable by collateral facts and not to matters of faith, mystery and superstition ; the Priests are more likely to tell lies, swindle and deceive the people, than the Deity is to be cruel, inconsistent, impotent, and enigmatical; believe nothing out of the order of Nature; the assertion of even one thousand honest fanatics would be inadequate to induce any sensible man to believe that the course of Nature was changed for one moment. 'o^ The Priests knew it would be useless to spend their time in declamation, in anathemas, in denunciation, against such as would not from mercenary motives, or good sense, pay tithes, and feed the idol of superstition ; to enforce their doc- trines, to support their extortion, to effect their uiilioly ra- 6 pine, they fallaciously promulgated posthumous torture ; they invented a Hell, to agonize, to rack, to torment such as would not help to support the imposition. The Priests know their Hell is not a place of actual existence, but a bugbear, and the Devil, the head master, is invented, is used as an emptying-pocket tool ; such as do not believe this pick-pocket machinery, such as do not suffer (hem- selves to be duped, misled, and plundered, by hypocrites, swindlers, rogues, and extortioners, are reproached as cri- minals, as sinners, as blasphemers, as infidels, and as lu- natics, and doomed to suffer everlasting torture. Is it like- ly that a just, wise, and benevolent iJeity would tlius un- mercifully punish innocent men for refusing to contribute to the lasciviousness, licentiousness, and drunkenness, of u vagabond, blaspheming Priesthood? there is no greater im- piety than attributing such enormity to a wise and parental God I The profanity of Priests cannot be sufficiently de- precated for alledging such monstrous injustice to the Deity, and asserting that he has more horrible powers, principles, and actions than the Devil ; the latter is generous, brave, and forbearing, compared with their God, to whom they attribute malice, revenge, cruelty, fallacy, and persecution to a whole race of people because a poor, ignorant, ex- hausted woman happened to rob an apple-tree, as he per- mits school-boys to do with impunity daily : even the Priests must allow he does not think so much of his apples as formerly. The Priest should build altars and offer apples to the Lord to act consistently. The Priests are famous mathematicians ; they can demon- strate that one is equal to three, or that three equals one; three eternals is equal to one eternal, and one holy equal to three holies ! To please the Deity is to act consistent with his ways; his desire, his intention, his object, is manifested in the organi- zation of Nature, and as independence and equality are the predominating features in Nature, so those who most strenuously advocate those principles are the most religious, the most patriotic, the most praiseworthy among men. The contrary policy of Priests, destined solely to aggran- dize their trade, is debasing the Deity, degrading man, and trampling upon his creation. Whatever the Deity values. Priests despise •, with a vandal ferocity they attack whatever does not lead to secure, enlarge, or multiply theemolunienls of the mosque and the church ; it is not, in fact, about the church they bicker, nor about souls and religion, but about tithes and offerings: the conduct of men is immaterial, they have a licence to commit any crime, so long as they will pay money for absolution and subscribe to the sanctity of tithes. There is no competition among Priests who shall do the utmost degree of good, but who shall have the power of tithing and deceiving the people: if the people had sufficient sense they would treat all Priests as the different kinds of Priests treat each other — as hypocrites and impostors; con- stant in jealousy, constant in acrimonious opposition and mutual abuse, every order, every genus, are contending for the spoil of credulity. The Priests are the enemies of liberty, the adversaries of free discussion, and the opposite of (quality, constantly conspiring against a people enjoying the blessings of free- dom, constantly fettering, debasing, and insulting the slave. While the Priest is too weak to be intolerant, he is flatter- ing, deceitful, mean and servile; but when fraud has ele- vated him to power, he is arbitrary and domineering, in^ flated with despotism, with insolence, and with vanity. The multitude of assassinations, of massacres and of wars — the avarice, the villainy, the bigotry and bloody- mindedness of Priests have occasioned, exceeds the powers of calculation ; the number of religious murders is lost in figures; every field has groaned under an altar of immola- tion ; the vegetation of every country has been fertilized, and the streets of every town deluged with blood shed by the machinations of priests ; look at that fact, for the bene- fit of your religion, you followers of the cross and the cre- scent; cant no more about your justice, your generosity, your forbearance, your humanity, your meekness, or your candour. The Priests have been, lor selfish purposes, the orators and fomentors of most of the mischiefs that have disgraced, paralyzed, and disfigured the fair character of human nature: it is disgraceful to any man to be seen in a dispute between Priests and Kings; as hypocrites, as im- postors, as common rogues, men of wisdom will never par- ticipate, never be interested, never be duped by the quarrels, and the envious animosities of the swindling trades. All the Priests — all that live by the trade of hypocrisy, 8 all that live by sacred imposition, are blasphemers, are infi- dels, are perverters of the truth, are the distorters of the will and object of the Deity ; and such as most assiduously at- tempt to dispel the delusion, are most religious in the eyes of God. Blasphemy is not an olTeuce against truth, but the offence of truth against Priestcraft. Notwithstanding the bickering, the animosity, and the jealousy the Priests entertain towards each other, they are consistent, they are unanimous, they are combined, in pro- secuting any man who has ability, who has honesty, and independence to attack the fraud and hypocris)^ by which they live; whoever attempts to analyze the farce, to unveil the imposition of revealed religion, is sure to be attacked by Bishops, by Imans, by Bonzes, and by Muftis; truth acts upon these animals as light does' upon the organization of bats and owls, and other reptiles, at mid-day. THE END. Just Published^ from the same Author, The CHARACTERS of a SOLDIER, a PEER, and the JEW BOOKS. Price Twopence each. Printed and Published hy R. CARLILE, 5;), Fleel-Street. THE CHARACTER OF A SOLDIER; Br PHILANTHROPOS. Honlron : PRINTED AND PUBLISHED BY R. CARLILE, 55, FLEET-STREET. 1821. Price I'wopenee^ THE CHARACTER OF A SOLDIER Nothing prevails more abundantly than hypocrisy, sophistry, and bigotry ; — the dupers and the duped — the rogues and fools, make up a considerable portion of the world, reluctantly compelled, forced by observa- tion, necessitated by experience, I unwillingly admit the existence of so much moral error and delinquency. For want of thought, for want of reason, for want of reflection, men suffer themselves to be made subser- vient to the views of military tyrants, regal and sacred impostors. A Soldier is a machine that privileged rogues work with : a Soldier is a brute, a biped, an erect monster, having the power of loco-motion, and a great thirst for human blood: — ithiresitself out to slay men, to slaugh- ter the innocent, or the guilty, as it may be ordered ; a Soldier is a unique monster, the most cool blooded ani- mal ; it will meditate upon its work of destruction, of voracity, upon its sanguinary repast, for years before its preternatural appetite is feasted with human gore. This bloody automaton, this infernal machine, this horrible monster, is not a man, it shall not be called man, it shall not disgrace man by being put by his side — itbifes itself out for a small sum to be the butcher <5f the human race, to shed blood, to push it,-;; sabre. 6f death into the breast of inuoceut men, women, and chil- dren ; to see the blood follow its blow, to withdraw the scythe reeking from the wound, to see the heart's blood bubble up in crimson froth, to see the victim fall, distorted, convulsed, agonized, and every pore pouring forth the cold clammy sweat of death, fills the monster with extacy. What can this monster be but a brute, a ferocious, carnivorous brute; stop not so fast. Sir, the tiger would say, " I have the credit of bloody ferocity, of carrying devastation through the woods, of spreading terror in my way, of desolating my course, I scorn, I despise, I dis- own the parallel, and loath the sanguinary automaton soldier; I am driven by my form, by my organization, by ray wants, to feed upon flesh, but not the flesh of my species ; I never destroy what 1 do not want to eat, I never shed oceans of blood I cannot suck, I never com- mence a wholesale carnage upon the females and the whelps of mykind, as was done at Manchester: Inever hiremyself too thers who want to carry on public devasta- tion ; do not disgrace me by comparison to a Soldier, do not cover me with ignominy, with calumny, with crimes, by so unnatural a comparison ; do me the justice, Sir, to rescue me from such infamous imputations, and although the servility of the elephant has placed him in the ranks of the Soldier, be assured the independent tiger knows no such climax of infamy, cruelty, and villainy as the manslayer glories in ; neither age, nor sex, norhuuger, disease, nor extremes of temperature, impel the tiger to attack, to wound, to mutilate his species ; there is a reciprocity of amity, of indulgence, of forbearance towards each other, even the lamb is sa- cred during satiety, the tiger is a lamb compared with a Soldier, there is less difference between a lamb and a tiger, than between a Soldier and a tiger." A Soldier is a male animal that hires itself out to slaughter the human species; to slaughter wholesale or retail, in units or thousands ; it engages to cut any man's throat when ordered, to level with cannon, to mow down with the sword or with musquetry, unarmed or s armed men ; the more wounds and blood,and raulilations.' and deaths, the more honour ; the more shrieks and screams, and widows, and orphans, and gore, the more laurels, medals and rejoicing. The heart of the Soldier is as cold as lead, as callous as flint, all the finer energies and soothing sympathies of the human soul are frozen up; an exsiccated feeling, a phlegmatic apathy, obscures, and eclipses, the dignified sensations of man. Did but man change his person, did but as great a metamorphosis take place in body as in mind, when he entered the ranks, he would be one of the most hideous objects that could be conceived or pictured ; could but ingenuitymake manifest the terrific, the murderouswork- ings of the Soldier's heart: — could but a transparency- manifest his servility, his sneaking sycophancy, and his mutual tyranny, his daily hope of slaughter for sake of promotion, and of gathering crimson blooded laurels. He prays to see fields deluged, theearth fertilized with blood, the birds, and grass, and herbs, fat and luxuriant from feeding upon human flesh and fluids; heisinextacy to hear the winds loaded with the sighs, and sobs, and groanSjof helpless wives and orphans ; he hopes to see the pearly eye bedewed with tears, swoln, red, and wild, in its watching and distraction ; he hopes the cold, hag- gard, motionless, oblivious hand of death will fall upon his companion, his superior, his commander ; If the Soldiers breast was diaphanous, his ebony heart would show all those horrible, those base, those degrading passions. Developement of these manifest principles, exposure of the Soldier's heart mustproveuothing exists in animat- ed nature of so horrible a character; what child can respect such a father? What father can respect such a sou ? What wile pos:-;essing all thegenerous sympathy of human kindness can caress such a husband ? She must shudder before she takes such a monster of human na- ture into her bosom; all the crocodiles, the boas, and j)oisonous serpents, never destroyed so many human beings, as the Soldiers have in an hour. If the Soldier should be so misled, so ignorant, so barbarou.«, so bloody-minded, as to hire biniself as a maji-kiUer to some regal iiiipo.stor; if he is su foolish, as to sacrifice his life, his health, or his family, other men should not countenance him ; should not associate with him, should not in any manner be connnected with a monster, that has turned their enemy, the com- mon destroyer of human life; the Soldier should be scouted by every citizen, whose common enemy he is. A standing army is a legalized banditti : it is worse than an illegal banditti, inasmuch as it robs and mur- ders under the name of law, and so evades the gibbet; the last may be extirpated and the body politic may be relieved of the nuisance, but the former is a cancer corroding the vitals of the country. A Soldier had his origin in barbarous times ; war is a custom descended from savage life, it is the appeal of ignorance and brutality ; it is the ignorance of men that makes Soldiers, the villainy of kings that makes war; if men were properly impressed from infancy of the su- periority of justice, over injustice, of right over wrong, they would see the folly, the monstrosity, and the wick- edness of war ; if sovereigns were to inculcate such no- tions of justice, of mercy, and of honesty, the people would not submit to the rapine, thetorture, and the hypo- crisy they now practice under the names of law, religion and regality ; the people would submit to nothing but sovereignty with limited power, and exercised in hu- manity, and justice ; now the kings of the earth, Spain and Portugal excepted, tyrannize over the people, and daily swindle and plunder them. The human mind is in a state of improvement; al- ready it has acquired knowledge to discard apart of the imposition practised by Kings and Priests, if men would reason correctly, tbey would discard the whole; when men are impressed with justice, with reason, and humanity, they will be ashamed of the custom of war, every man will be ashamed to be a Soldier, he will be considered in the most execrable light, the name will be synonymous with villainy, with manslaughter, and with murder ; Regimentals are llw livery of the lice?i8- ed murderer of mankind . War is the darling game of King«:, and the life and property of the subject is the prize staked ; while bloody minded despots are allowed to continue this prac- tice there will be no happiness for the human race. If the more civilized people of the earth were impressed with those sentiments, there would be no more war among them ; the rising generation would see the hor- rid barbarity of the custom, and would almost disown their forefathers for having practised such cruel folly. The Governments of Spain, Portugal, and America, alone can be identified with men ; all the other king- doms of tbeearthmay be characterized as bloody, brutal, ferocious despotisms. It is to the former countries I ap- peal, I call upon them in the name of reason, justice, and humanity to inculcate opinions from the senate and the throne which unceasingly tend to remove the delusion of the people in all countries. 1 call upon them to disavow all foreign and aggressive wars, and assure the people of all states, that the custom of war is bloody, useless, and improvident, and that a Soldier has laid down the noble character of a man and assum- ed that of a monster, exceeding even the tiger in san- guinary barbarity. As a government is created for the common benefit of men so ought such as created and constitute them, to do every thing interesting to humanity ; they should never cease to neutralize the baneful and unnatural efforts of the bloody minded tyrants that profit by war. Except the governments of men should be actually menaced by war, by the blood governments of Europe, they should not have on foot a militia, as that would keep alive the bloody feeling that should be eradicated, the name of every house, of every street, of every Bridge, and of every Pillar should be changed, that associates itself with any bloody battle or monster : until govern- ments do advocate such schemes of philanthropy, until they are so reformed as to do nothing but for public good, and every thing for public good, their necessary ends are not accomplished. Daily encouragement should be held out to such as can by any effort of genius ad J to the utility of the arts ajad sciences ; it is not by rewarding such as multiply the infernal naachines of death, but by compensating those who study the means of pursuing long and healthful life, that the genius, the wisdom and the generosity of the governinentis evinced ; how much blood has been shed, how much property has been devastated, how many seas of tears have flowed, it is impossible to calculate; but it is quite certain that all the Soldiers that ever ex- isted never effected the real service of one hay-maker in a single day's labour. Had it not been for tyrannical, blood-thirsty kings, priests,andgovernors, who preferred the crooked wind- ings of injustice to justice, a battle never would have" been fought, and there would have been neither tyrant nor slave upon the earth; all would have been free, rich, and happj^ The day will arrive, it must arrive, when war will be viewed in its true light, and will be discarded as the re- mains of barbarism.andcruelty ; If the principles con- tended for were advocated by Spain, Portugal and, America, other states would be ashamed, would cease to practice the horrible villarny. As it would require sometime, totally to eradicate this shocking, barbarous and bloody trade from the listof iniquity practised by priviliged villainy, so such nations as were foremost to emancipate themselves from disgrace, might be placed in some degree of danger by their savage neighbours; under such circumstancesthe odium attached to the trad- ing murderer would not apply, as the case would be un- equivocally one of self-defence which the laws of nature qualify all men to do their utmost to preserve, still, the principles advocated should be held in view, and, the mo- ment danger is over, that moment should the soldier become a citizen. Printed and Published by E„Caelile, 55, Fleet Stjeet, London. THOUGHTS ON l^dtstoti. BY M. DIDEROT. PRINTED AND PUBLISHED BY R. CARLILE, No. 183, FLEET STREET. 1819. PRICii rOURPENC*. * I ' 1 j< > 'M ' ii>r[' ^'S--^J THOUGHTS ON igleligion. Doubts in religious matters, far from being blameable — far from being acts of impiety ;, ought to be regarded as praiseworthy, when they pro- ceed from a man who humbly acknowledges his ignorance, and arise from the fear of offending God by the abuse of reason. To admit any conformity between the reason of man, and the eternal reason of God, and to pretend that God demands the sacrifice of human reason, is to maintain that God wills one thing, and intends another thing at the same time. When God, of whom I hold my reason, de- mands of me to sacrifice it, he becomes a mere juggler that snatches from me what he pretended to give. If I renounce my reason, 1 have no longer a guide — I must then blindly adopt a secondary principle, and the matter in question becomes a supposition. A 2 4 THOUGHTS ON RELIGION. If reason be a gift of Hearven, and we can say as much of faith, Heaven has certainly made us two presents not only incompatible, but in direct contradiction to each other. In order to solve the difficulty, we are compelled to say either that faith is a chimera, or that reason is useless. Pascal, Nicole and others have said, that God will punish with eternal torments the faults of a guilty father upon all his innocent offspring; and that this is a proposition superior to reason, and not in contradiction to it; but what shall we propose as being contradictory to reason if such blasphemy as this is not so? Bewildered in an immense forest during the night, and having only one small torch for my guide, a stranger approaches and thus addresses me : — '' Friend, blow out thy light, if thou wouhh< make sure of the right path." This stranger was a priest. If my reason be the gift of Heaven, it is the voice of Heaven that speaks ; shall I hearken to it ? Neither merit nor demerit is applicable to the judgment of our rational faculties, for all the submission and good-will imaginable could not assist the blind man in the perception of colours. .1 am compelled to perceive evidence where it is, or the want of evidence where it is not, so THOUGHTS ON UELIGIOX. ^) long as I retain my senses; and if my judgment fail me^ it becomes a misfortune, not a sin. The Author of Nature would not reward me for having- been a icit, surely, then, he will not damn me for having been di fool. Nay, more; he will not damn me even for being- wicked. Is not my own conscience a sufficient punishment for me ? Every virtuous action is accompanied with an inward satisfaction ; every criminul action with chagrin and remorse. The mind acknowledges without shame its repugnance to such, or such propositions, although there is neither virtue nor vice in the belief or disbelief of them. If grace be necessary to belief, let us wait till that grace be sent us from above. God surely will not punish us for the want of that which it has not pleased him to bestow upon us. You tell me to ask this grace in prayer, but is not grace necessary to assist me in asking for faith, the want of which I cannot discover by the light of reason ? The true religion, interesting the whole human race at all times and in all situations, ought to be eternal, universal, and self-evident; whereas the religions pretended to be revealed having none of these characteristics, are consequently demon- strated to be false. q THOUGHTS ON RELIGION. The miracles, of which only a few men are said to have been witnesses, are insufficient to prove the truth of a religion that ought to be be- lieved by the whole world. The pretended facts with which all revealed religion is supported are ancient and wonderful; that is to say, the most suspicious evidence pos- sible, to prove things the most incredible ; for to prove the truth of the Gospel by a miracle, is to prove an absurdity by a contradiction in nature. Is it quite certain that the God of the Chris- tians is the true God ? It appears that the Devil is a much more powerful Being, seeing that the number of the damned is so much greater than that of the elect. The Son of God died purposely to vanquish the Devil. In order to gain his point he was re- duced to the necessity of dying, and yet the Devil has ever since had the ascendancy. How then are we benefitted by the death of the Son of God? The God of the Chistians, for an apple, punish- ed all the human race and killed his own son. This only proves that God is a father who makes a great deal to do about his apples, and cares very little for his children. A God that killed God to appease God, was an expressive phrase of La Hontan, a phrase of itself sufficient to destroy the Christian religion, a phrase TIIOUGUT8 OK REUGION. 7 that will still retain its absurdity, should one hun- dred folio volumes be written to prove it rational. But what will God do to those who never heard of the death of his Son ? or who, having heard of him, still remained unbelievers ? Will he punish the deaf for not hearing? Will he torment the weak-headed for not understanding an inconceiv- able absurdity? -: Why are the miracles of Jesus Christ true, and ' those of Esculapius, Pythagoras, and Apollonius, false ? All the Jews at Jerusalem who saw the great miracles of Jesus, were doubtless converted ? By no means. — So far from having any belief in him, they put him to death. These Jews (whom a God himself came to convert) must have been a very stiff-necked race. — We have in every coun- try seen the people drawn aside and deceived by a single false miracle, and yet all the true miracles of Jesus made very little impression on the minds of the Jews. The miracle of their incredulity is no doubt wonderful ; however, our priests reply, that this obstinacy of the Jews had been predicted as a chastisement from Heaven. In that case why did God work so many miracles when the futility of them had been foreseen ? It is morally certain that Caesar existed. The existence of Jesus is as certain as the existence of 8 THOUGHTS ON RELIGION. Caesar ; — it is thence inferred that the resurrec- tion of Jesus is also certain, but the conclusion is false; the existence of Cffisar was not miraculous, wherefore should the existence of Jesus be thought so? The religion of Jesus, announced by ignorant fanatics (who were either easily deceived or easily deceived others) made the first Christians; the same religion now preached by learned men con- tinues to make unbelievers. You tell me that these ignorant Apostles suffer- ed death to prove the truth of what they preached to mankind; instead of which they proved only their own enthusiasm, or the chastisement of the people on whom they practised their hypocrisy. To suffer martyrdom in any cause proves nothing, cxcej)t that our party is not the most powerful. How did it happen that God permitted to be put to death those men that he sent purposely to convert the world .? Would it not have been more in conformity with the divine attributes to change the hearts of the people ? As for the martyrs who suffered after the time of the Apostles, they were not witnesses of the miracles of Jesus ; they died to maintain that those who had instructed them in the Christian religion, had neither deceived themselves nor wished to de- ceive others. THOUGHTS ON REUGION. 9 We attest what we have ourselves seen, or what we believe we have seen. When we attest what Others have seen, we prove nothing, except that we are willing to believe them on their words. The whole fabric of Christianity is built on the authority of those who had formerly an interest in establishing it, and who now have an interest in maintaining it. It is pretended, that submission to legislative authority forbids all examination and reasoning ; but do not the interested Priests of all the reli- gions on earth pretend to possess this authority ? Does it not equally belong to the Bramins, the Talapoins, the Bonzes, the Molochs, as well as to the Ministers of Christianity ? It is the education of youth which makes a Christian believe in Christ, a Turk in Mahomet, and an Indian in the incarnations of the Vestnou. It is the education of youth which makes the Sia- mese believe the wonders that are told him about Sommonocodom, Faith, in every country, is only a blind defer- ence to the sentiments of the priests, who are al- ways infallible where they are sufficiently power- ful. Our priests are unceasingly talking to us of the weakness and errors of the human mind ; but is the mind of a priest more infallible than mine ? \0 THOUGHTS ON RELIGION. Is his understanding less subject to error than that of an unbeliever ? May not his passions and interests deceive him in the same way that others are deceived ? We no sooner refuse to believe on the bare word of a priest, than he endeavours to frighten us ; but the terror he excites in us is not a con- vincing argument, neither can fear be a motive of credibility. Believe, or you will he damned. This is the strongest argument in Theology, But is it certain that 1 shall be damned for not believing what appeared to me incredible? Divines have long been asked to reconcile the dogma of eternal punishment with that of infinite mercy ; but this they will not meddle with ; yet still they persist in representing our heavenly Father as a tyrant, to whom no father of a family would wish to have any resemblance. Why would you punish a guilty wretch when no utility can arise from his punishment? What good results to mankind, or to the Deity himself, from the punishment of the millions of unfortu- nate beings who have already been damned? The dogma of eternal punishment is the off- spring of folly, of atrocity, and of blasphemy. If God will punish eternally, what proportion exists between the offence and the chastisement? If he punish for his own satisfaction, he becomes a THOUGHTS ON RELIGION". II monster of barbarity ; if he punish to correct others^ his risjour is useless for those who are not witnesses of it. But further : — Why is this God so wrathful ? Can man, either living or dead, tarnish his glory and disturb his repose and felicity ? If God be offended at sin, it is because he wills to be offend- ed. If God will eternally punish sin, it is be- cause he wills that sin shall eternally be com- mitted. It is pretended that God will burn the wicked man (who can do nothing against him) in a fire that shall endure for ever; yet should we not re- gard as culpable any father who should plan the easiest death imaginable for his son, though that son had compromised his honour, his fortune, or even his life ? God the Father judges mankind deserving of his eternal vengeance ; God the Son judges them worthy of his infinite mercy ; the Holy Ghost re- mains neutral. How can we reconcile this ver- biage with the unity of the will of God? All the evi-ls that could possibly be committed would only merit an infinite punishment; yet, in order that we may always be terrified at the idea of Deity, the priests have made man suffici- ently powerful to offend the Author of Nature to all eternity. \ft THOUGHTS ON RELIGION, All the evil which man is capable of committing; is not all the evil that possibly might be com- mitted. How can a finite being-, a worm of earth, offend the infinite being who created him, or dis- turb the powers which regulate the universe? I should, without hesitation, believe any re- spectable individual who might bring me the in- telligence of an army having obtained a victory over its opponent, &c.; but should the whole population of Paris assure me that a dead man rose from his grave, I would not believe a word of it. When we find that an historian has imposed upon us, or that a whole nation has been de- ceived, we must not take these for prodigies. A single demonstration is more convincing than fifty unconnected facts. Pontiff of Maho- met ! — cause the lame man to walk, the dumb to speak, the blind to see, or the dead to rise from their graves, and to thy great astonishment my faith shall not be shaken. Wouldst thou have me to become thy proselyte — lay aside these pranks and let us reason together. I have more depend- ance on my judgment than I have on my eyes. How canst thou believe that God requires to be worshipped ? Weak mortal ! What need has the Deity of thy homage ? Dost thou think that thou canst add any thing to his happiness or to his glory ? Thou mayest honour thyself by rais- THOUGHTS ON RELIGION. 13 ing thy thoughts to the Great Author of thy be- ing, but thou canst do nothing for him, he is too much above thy insignificance. Always bear in mind, that if any kind of worship be more accept- able to him than the rest^ it must be that which proceeds from an honest heart. What matter then in what manner thou expressest thy senti- ments ? Does he not read them in thy mind ? What matters it in what garments^ in what atti- tude, in what language thou addressest him in prayer ? Is he like those kings of the earth who reject the petitions of their subjects, because they have been ignorant of, or disregarded some little formality ? Pull not down the Almighty to thy own littleness^ but believe that if one worship were more agreeable to him than another, he would have made it known to the whole world. Believe that he receives with the same goodness the wishes of the Mussulman, the Catholic, and the Indian ; that he hears with the same kindness the prayers of the savage, who addresses him from the midst of a forest, as those of a Pontifl', who wears the tiara. Nothing could be better adapted to overthrow morality and destroy it altogether, than to couple it with religion ; neither could any thing be more pernicious than to make men believe that they offended God when they injured themselves or their fellow- creatures; and henc^ arose the ne- 14 THOUGHTS ON RELIGION. cessity of obtaining- God's favour^ without any re- gard to the duties they owe to their brethren. Reason tells us that when we commit crimes, it is men, and not God, that we injure; and common sense tells us that we injure our- selves when we give way to disorderly pas- sions. The Christian religion teaches us to imitate a God that is cruel, insiduous, jealous, and implacable in his wrath. Christians! with such a model before you, what will be your morality ? Can the God of Moses, of Joshua, and of David, be the God of an honest man ? A religion is dangerous when it confounds our ideas of morality; a religion is false when it de- stroys the perfections of the Deity ; a religion is detestable when it substitutes for its worship a vindictive daemon instead of a beneficent God. Christians ! in obeying your gospels to the let- ter, you will be neither citizens, husbands, fathers, friends, . nor faithful subjects. You will be pil- grims on earth — strangers in your own country — fierce enemies to yourselves — ^and your bre- thren, and your groans even will not leave you the hope of ever being happy. FINIS. Printed 4>y R. Carlile, No. 183, Fleet-street, JUST PUBLISHED, By R. Carlile, 183, Fleet-street, THE THEOLOGICAL WORKS OF THOMAS PAINE: CONTAINING THE AGE OF REASON, in Three Parts. A LETTER to the Honourable THOMAS ERSKINE, on the Prosecution of Thomas Williams. A DISCOURSE, delivered to the Society of Theopbilan- thropists at Paris. AN ESSAV on the ORIGIN of FREEMASONRY. A REPLY to the BISHOP of LLANDAFF'S APO- LOGY for the BIBLE. Shortly Ttill be Published^ THE LIFE OF DAVID ; or, A Man after God's own Heart. Also^ JEHOVAH UNVEILED, in a Letter to the Bishop of LUndaff. By A Tradesman. ^ University of California SOUTHERN REGIONAL LIBRARY FACILITY 305 De Neve Drive - Parl