. AD D I T I O N S T O COMMON SENSE; ADDRESSED TO TH< INHABITANTS OF AMERICA, l PHILADELPHIA, PRINTED: XONDON, Re-printed for J. ALMON, oppofite Burlington* Houfe, in Piccadilly, 1776. E , .*::.' r CONTENTS, Page j&Merican Independency defended 5 Antient Teftimony and Principles of the Peo- ple called Quakers 9 The Propriety of Independency 13 A Review of the American Conteftf 1 6 Letter to the Earl of Dartmouth 23 Qbfervations on Lord North's Conciliatory flan 25 On fending Commiffioners to treat with the Congrefs T 29 Queftions and Anfwers 33 Cafe in Point - 41 fropofals for a Confederation of the Co- lonies ., -^ 44 ADDI- ADDITIONS T O COMMON SENSE. AMERICAN INDEPENDANCY DEFENDED. w. HEN the iktfcB pamphlet intitled COMMON" SENSE firft made its appearance in favour of that fo often abjured idea of independance upon Great-Britain, I was informed that no lefs than three gentlemen of re- fpectable abilities were engaged to anfwer it. As yet I have feen nothing which directly pretends to difpute a fingle pofition of the author. The folemn Teftimony tf the Quakers, however intended, having offered no- thing to the purpofe, I (hall take leave to examine this important queftion, with all candour and attention, and iubmit the refult to my much injured country. Depend ance of one man, or ftate, upon another, is cither abfolute, or limited by fome certain terms of agree- ment. The dependance of thefe Colonies, which (Treat- Britain calls co'nftitutiona/i as declared by a& of Parlia- ment, is abfolute. If the contrary of this be the bug- bear fo many have been declaiming againft, I could wHh my countrymen would conilder the confequence of fo ftupid a profeffion. If a limited dependance is intended, I would be much obliged to any one who will fhew me the Britanno- American Magna Charta wherein the terms of our limited dependance are precifely ftated. If no (uch thing can be found, and abfolute dependance be accounted inadmiflible, the found we are fquabbling about has certainly no determinate meaning. If any fay, we mean that kind of dependance^ we acknowledged at and before the year J 763$ \ anfwer, v tageous to them. So that thofe (hort-fighted politicians, who conclude that this ftep will involve us in {laughter and devaluation, may plainly perceive that no meafure in our power will fo naturally and effectually work our deli- verance* The motion of a finder of the Grand Monarch would procure as gentle a temper in the Omnipotent; Britifli Mintfter as appeared in the Manilla ranfom and Falkland-iflands affairs. From without, certainly, we have every thing to hope, nothing to fear ; from within fome tell us the Prefbyterians, if freed from the retrain- ing power of Great-Britain, would over-run the peace- able Quakers in this government. For my own part, I defpife and deteft the bickerings of fe6taries, and am apprehenfive of no, trouble from that quarter, efpecially. while no peculiar honours nor emoluments are annexed, to either. J heartily wifti too many of the Quakers did not give caufe of complaint, by endeavouring to coun- teract the meafures of their fellow-citizens for the com- mon fafety. If they profefs themlelves only pilgrims Jiere, let them walk through the men of this world without interfering with their actions on either fide. If they would not pull down Kings, let them not Jupport tyrants ; for, whether they underftand it or not, there is, and ever has been, an, elFential difference in the cha-. Finally, with M. De Vatell, I account aflate a moral perjon having an inter eft and will of its civn, and I think that ilate a monfter whofe prime mover has an intereft and will in direct opposition to its profperity and fecu- rity. This pofition has been fo clearly demqnftrated in the pamphlet firft mentioned in this effay, that 1 (hall only add, if there are any arguments in favour of re- turning to a ftate of dependance on Great-Britain, that is, on the prefent Adminiftration, of Great-Britain, I could wi(h they were timely offered, that they may be foberly confidered, before the cunning proppfals of the cabinet fet all the timid, lazy, and irrefolute members of the community into a clamour for peace at any rate. CANDID US, ( 9 ) The ANCIENT TESTIMONY and PRINCIPLES of the People called QUAKERS, renewed, with refpett to the KING and GOVERNMENT; and touching the COMMOTIONS nwu prevailing in thefe and other Parts of AMERICA; *