J-/// r If. p IS )!!■■■ 1 : THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES internatinnal Qlnngrfss of HELD AT SAN FRANCISCO. CALIFORNIAi U. S. A. JULY 28, 29, 30 and 31. 1915 PROCEEDINGS FKANK IIERVKY PETTINORI^I^, Presidknt cr. AUKNCK B1>WAKT> IIK.VLD, SBCRKTA.HY I I <» PROCEEDINGS INTERNATIONAL. CONGRESS OF GENEALOGY SAN FRANCISCO JULY 26-31, 1915 ti PUBLISHED BY ORGANIZATION COMMITTEE OF INTERNATIONAL GENEALOGICAL FEDERATION CSX «0«' .Xiw. XJ «L ^<> .^ _ ■ O PROCEEDINGS INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF GENEALOGY TABLE OF CONTENTS Title PAge Section I — Historical 1. Foreword I by James A. Ban 2. History of Organization ^ by ^outwell Tiunlap Section II — Proceedings 1. Summary of Proceedings 6 2. Minutes of Sessions . . 29 Section III — Papers and Addresses n chronoJosical order ai read. 1. "Genealogy and Family Name Origins of the Chinese Race"_- 33 by Kiang Shoo Chuan Kang Hu 2. "Genealogical Records of the Maori of New Zealand" With tables 46 by Elsdon Best 3. "Genealogy of the Native Hawalians" 58 by Bruce Cartwright, Jr. 4. "Genealogical Charts" (Summary of exhibit) 60 by Sarah Louise Kimball 3. " The Relationship Between Genealogy and Eugenics" _ 63 by Paul Poperioe 6. " Genealogical Research Among Descendents of the Mayflower Emigrants" 79 by Herbert Folger 7. "The Study of Genealogy and Its Place in the Affairs of Human Society " 81 by Charles G. Finney Wilcox 8. "The House Restored" 91 by Marian Longfellow 9. "Genealogical Research in Denmark" 95 by Th. Hauch-Fausholl 10. " Letter from Siam " 99 V. Frankfurter \\. "President's Address" (Commemorative Session) 100 by Frank Hetcey Pettingell 12. " Address of Welcome " (Commemorative Session) 101 by Colcin B. Brown 13. " Response and Acceptance of Commemorative Medal " 103 by Henry Byron Phillips SECTION I iTORIGl^L By JAMES A. BARR OIRKCTOR OK CONGRKSSKS. PANAMA-PACIFIC INTERNATIONA f. KXPOSITION The International Congress of Genealogy, which held its meet- ings in the Exposition Memorial Auditorium at the Civic Center of San Francisco, July 28th, 29th and 30th, 1915, was conceived in the active circles of the California Genealogical Society in the autumn of 1912. From the day of its conception, the idea grew within that Society and soon a committee composed of its most active members was working in full harmony with the Bureau of Conventions and Societies of the Panama-Pacific International Exposition to get in touch with the leading genealogists of the world and with the chief genealogical, historic, patriotic and family organizations to induce their co-operation and affiliation. The Congress was held at the time originally outlined, was composed of delegates representing sixty-six {66) organizations from various portions of the United States and from other coun- tries, which named 297 delegates to attend and participate in the Congress. It was generally conceded by those attending or taking an interest in the Congress, that it was more widely representa- tive, truer to its original purpose, and more .successful in the cul- mination of its conceded sentiment than any first gathering of world organizations ever held. The International Congress of Genealogy appealed to no mer- cenary or commercial spirit, but was a worthy attempt by the promoters to delve deep into the sentiment of those upholding truths of the past, in a first attempt to get them to assemble, to agree upon certain methods of endeavor, to perfect standards of work and records, to exclude the spurious, the ill-gotten and the unproved, to exchange views regarding more systematic procedure, and to consider the value or relative importance of heraldry, eugenics and other problems seeming to have connection ^v^th genealogy. i INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF GENEALOGY All this was accomplished with little excitement and dissent during the three days' gathering and all present felt that their highest expectation had been accomplished by the appointment of a competent committee of three to make the work and the organiza- tion permanent, by taking adequate steps to organize the Interna- tional Genealogical Federation. It is hoped and believed by all those participating, that such wise and safe steps will be taken by the experienced men chosen for the task and by the persistent and timely activities carried on by the competent secretary chosen, that as a result of the First In- ternational Congress of Genealogy, an International Genealogical Federation M'ill be organized, which will not only attract the co- operation of all deserving genealogical, historical and family organ- izations, but will so arrange the meetings, as to time and place, as to result in continued attendance, greater interest and the achieve- ment of every worthy desire. PERSONNEL OF THE CALIFORNIA GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY'S ORGANIZATION COMMITTEE. Chairman Orra E. Monnette Secretary Miss Carlie Inez Tomlinson f- Members Hon. Boutwell Dunlap Henry B. Phillips Mrs. Lydia Lucelia Gillogly Jas. a. Barr JAMES ADAM BARR HISTORY OF ORGANIZATION HISTORY OF ORGANIZATION OF INTERNA- TIONAL CONGRESS OF GENEALOGY By BOUTWELL DUNLAP RECXtRDING SECRETARY CALIFORNIA OKNEAIXIGICAL SOCIETY Being named to give a history of the organization of the Inter- national Congress of Genealogj^ that its record may not be incom- plete, the writer proposed in the summer of 1912 to the Hon. Jam.es A. Barr, Director of Congresses of the Panama-Pacific International Exposition, that invitations be extended by the Exposition to all genealogical, historical, family and eugenic societies and organiza- tions to hold their general and annual meetings at about the same time at the Exposition and that they name delegates for a general congress to m.eet at the same time to consider subjects of related interest. Mr. Barr expressed his approval of the plan, but thought that additional results would be secured if his department should have the co-operation of the California Genealogical Society, where- upon Mr. Barr was invited to address the Society on October 5, 1915. However, it is particularly to Mr. Barr and his department at the Exposition and to the California Genealogical Society, through its members and committee, that the credit for organizing and making effective the plan is entirely due. After Mr. Barr's address, invitations were extended jointly by the President and Directors of the Exposition and President Henry B. Phillips of the California Genealogical Society, upon behalf of the Society, to various genealogical and historical societies to hold their meetings in San Francisco. A few weeks later, on December 7, 1912, owing to the fact that the writer had emphasized the biological aspects of genealogy, he "was given," say the minutes of the Society, ' ' full power to invite any eugenic society to meet in conjunction with the genealogical, historical and family associations at the Panama-Pacific International Exposition and to work in con- junction with Doctor David Starr Jordan to bring the International Eugenics Congress to San Francisco during the Exposition." Invitations to organizations by this time had aroused much in- terest both among their members and in the press. Eventually about twenty-five of such organizations held their meetings in San Francisco at some period during the Exposition. At the same time these invitations were being issued, a large number of letters to persons and organizations asking for suggestions as to the proposed congress were sent out. 4 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF GENEALOGY Upon April 5, 1913, the Society resolved that President Phillips appoint a "Committee upon the Organization of an International Congress of Genealogy and Eugenics." President Phillips named the following members of the Society upon this Committee: Orra E. Monnette, chairman, James A. Barr, Boutwell Dunlap, Mrs. Lydia Lucelia Gillogly, Henry B. Phillips, Miss Carlie Inez Tom- linson, secretary. In order not to conflict with eugenic organizations and eugenics, the Committee finally decided that the name of the Congress be restricted to the International Congress of Genealogy and that such a Congress be held. However, its date was so arranged that the Congress was to meet during the week beginning Monday, July 26, 1915, succeeding the week in which the American Historical Asso- ciation met and preceding the week of the annual meeting of the American Genetic Association and the Second International Con- ference on Race Betterment — all at the Exposition. The Committee decided that at the Congress official delegates 1)6 limited to two from each society, association or organization with one hundred members or less, with an additional delegate for each one hundred members or fraction thereof. Invitations to name such delegates to the Congress were thereupon issued by President Henry B. Phillips upon behalf of the Society and its Committee. The Committee announced by circular distributed to all nations, again inviting suggestions that the tentative subjects for discussion by the Congress, would be : " (a) The relation between genealogical investigations and eugenics; (b) The establishment of a National Bureau of Heraldry in the Ignited States, to become a recognized and accepted authority; (c) The establishment of a bureau wherein genealogists of standing shall be permitted to register so that a certain stamp of official approval may be placed upon their work; (d) Action looking to a uniform publication of the historical and vital records of various counties and States now unpublished, ajod the establishment of a National Bureau of Vital Records as part of Governmental records at Washington, similar to the records in the General Register Office, Somerset House, London, England." The names of three hundred and ten societies and over two thou- sand specialists or individuals peculiarly interested in the subjects of the Congress were collected and corresponded with throughout the world. This correspondence has been preserved in the archives of the Exposition and contains much valuable suggestive material for use by the International Genealogical Federation. Never has the preliminary correspondence for the organization of the first meeting of a congress been more thoroughly covered. Thousands of letters were sent and received. The writer cannot MRS. LYDIA LUCELIA GIULOGLY HISTORY OP ORGANIZATION 5 allow the occasion to puss without expressing the indebtedness of all to the lion. James A. Barr and his Bureau of the Exposition for this result. Had not the war intervened — as is shown by the letters of those organizations and individuals who expressed themselves before its outbreak as intending to bo represented by delegates or in person, but who after its beginning gave notice of their inability to attend — both foreign and domestic representation would have been much larger than it was. r^^^^^ SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS SECTION II mm INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF GSNEIALOGY S«BHA^¥ OF PMOOIIBiH@S INTEENATIONAL CONGRESS OF GENEALOGY. ^ SESSIONS AND OFFICERS The Congress met at San Francisco on July 28, 1915. Sessions were held during four days: July 28, 29, 30 and 31. Mr. Orra E. Monnette acted as Temporary Chairman pending the formation of a regular organization ; the Congress organized by electing the following officers : President, Mr. Frank Hervey Pettingell. Secretary, Mr. Clarence Edward Heald. Assistant Secretary, Miss C. I. Tomliuson. Such committees as were required to handle the affairs of the Congress were appointed from time to time. A list of all Com- mittees is given on a later page. ORGANIZATIONS REPRESENTED The following organizations were represented by delegates: 1. National Society, Americans of Roj^al Descent. 2. The Society for the Preservation of New England An- tiquities, Inc. 3. College of Arms & Seigneurial Court of Canada. 4. The Edward Bangs Descendants. FRANK HERVeV P E T T I N G E L I- SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS 9 5. The Bates Association. 6. Descendants of James Burton of Dent, Yorkshire, England. 7. California Genealogical Society. 8. Child Family Association. 9. The Doane Family Association of America. 10. The Donegal Society of Lancaster County, Pa. 11. Emery F mily Association. 12. Order " the Founders and Patriots of America. 13. New Jfcxsey Society of the Order of the Founders and Patriots of America. 14. Frost Family Association of America. 15. Society of Genealogists of London. 16. The National Genealogical Society. 17. Goodwin Family Association. 18. New England Historic Genealogical Society. 19. Society of the Descendants of Pilgrim John Rowland of the Ship Mayflower. 20. The Huguenot Society of America. 21. American Irish Historical Society, California Chapter. 22. Imperial University of Japan, Tokyo. 23. The Jewett Family of America. 24. Kimball Family Association of California. 25. The Lindsay Family Association of America, Inc. 26. Maine Genealogical Society. 27. Society of IMayflower Descendants in the State of California. 28. Old Plymouth Colony Descendants Society. 29. Parker Historical and Genealogical Association. 30. Solomon Peirce Family Association. 31. Pike Family Association. 32. National Society of the Sons and Daughters of the Pilgrims. 33. Edmund Rice Descendants. 34. Daughters of the American Revolution, California Society. 35. Sons of the Revolution (National Society). 36. Society, Sons of the Revolution in the State of California. 37. California Society, Sons of the American Revolution. 38. The Robinson Genealogical Society. 39. The Smalls of America. 40. Tower Genealogical Society. 41. The Genealogical Society of Utah. 42. The Stone-Jones Genealogical Society. 43. The Order of Washington. 10 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF GENEALOGY 44. National Womans' Relief Society (Genealogical Extension Division). 45. Wilcox and Allied Families. 46. Mitchell Family Association, In addition to the above list the following societies recognized the Congress by appointing delegates. Many of these delegates, though unable to be present, sent messages of good will: 47. Society of the Descendants of Robert Bartlet of Plymouth, Massachusetts. 48. Bicknell Family Association. 49. Nathaniel Brewster Family Association. 50. The Captain Deliverance Browne Association. 51. Colonial Daughters. 52. American Society of Colonial Families. 53. Society of Colonial Wars in the State of Connecticut. 54. Descendants of John Folsom. 55. Western Hampden Historical Society, Inc. 56. Marshfield Historical Society. 57. The Historical Society of Montgomery County, Pa. 58. Historical Society of New Mexico. 59. The Irvine Society of America. 60. Louisiana Historical Society. 61. The McDowell Clan. 62. Missouri Society, Sons of the Revolution. 63. The Colonel Daniel Putnam Association, Inc. 64. The Shedd Family Association. 65. Underhill Society of America. 66. Worcester Family Association. ^ i I ■ SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS 11 DELEGATES PRESENT Following is the list of delegates present (numbers refer to preceding list of societies) : Name. Society. Mrs. Inez Knight Allen (41) Lewis Anderson ('*-'-) Nephi Anderson (^1 ) Mark Austin (^1) Mrs. Gertrude L. Baerd (44) George Anderson Bangs (4) Miss Minerva Leantine Barker (42) Mrs. Vincy R. Stone Barker (42, 44) James L. Barr ( '^ ) Mrs. Clara M. Bartholomew (42) Henry L. Bates ( ^ ) Louisa B. Benson , (44) James Blake (41) Thomas Edward Bond (24) Mrs. Anna Borland (^4) R. L. Bybee (^^^ Miss Lillian Cameron (41) Annie Wells Cannon (44) Mrs. Harriet Dudley Chapman (7) Unity Chappel (^) Joseph Christenson (41) Lucy Clapper (23) Mrs. D. H. Coleord ( 2 ) Mrs. Nathan Cole (3^) Mrs. Sarah Pike Conger (31) 12 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF GENEALOGY Etta Pearl Dam (30) Francis Herbert Dam (30) Miss Edna May Davis (44) Jeremiah Deasy (21) Willis Milnor Dixon (13, 35, 58) Georcre Howard Robinson Doane ( 9 ) M-,. Thomas B. Dozier (34) Jc es Duckworth (41) Boutwell Dunlap ( 7 ) J. M. Eddy (28) Jane Jennings Eldredge (44) Miss Jessie F. Emery (11, 18) Mrs. S. A. Mitchell Farr (46) Walter H. Faunce (28) Herbert Folger (27) Mrs. Susanna Pike French (31, 34) Norman S. Frost (14, 33) Mrs. Susa Young Gates (18, 41) Heber J. Grant (41) Lenora T. Harrington (44) Clarence E. Heald (31) Aroetta Hale Holgate (44) Miss Mabel Hoyt ( 4, 14) Mrs. Janette A. Hyde (44) Miss Annis C. Jewett (23) A. E. Jewett (23) E. L. Jewett (23) George A. Jewett (23, 18) J. M. Jewett (23) Mrs. Jessie P. Jones (41) Miss Sarah Louise Kimball (17, 24, 27) Hilda H. H. Larson (44) Anna Jewett LeFevre (23) James W. Lesueur (41) Mrs. C. F. Lewis (34) Edwin B. Lindsay (25) Mrs. Amy B. Lyman. (44) Annie Lynch (44) Mrs. J. C. Lynch (34) Mrs. Walter Damon Mansfield (1, 15) SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS 13 Oeorgina G. Marriott (44) Mrs. Elizabeth C. :McCime (41, 44) Elizabeth C. McDonald (44) Miss Sarah M. McLillard (44) Frederick A. H. F. Mitchell (41, 46) Orra Eugene Monnette (3, 12, 13, 20, 36, 43) John Tower Morrison (40) N. Murakami (22) B. M. Newcomb (2, 27) K. C. 'Conner (21) Miss Susanne R. Patch (34) Mrs. George W. Percy (26) T. A. Perkins (37) Frank Hervey Pettingell (2, 36, 18) Henry Byron Phillips (16, 32) Miss Catherine G. Pike (31) Alvin Plummer ( 7 ) Frank T. Pomeroy (41) A. P. Renstrom (41 ) William B. Rice (33) Joseph E. Robinson (41 ) Frederick Scholes (41 ) Artemesia Segmiller (44) Joseph F. Smith Jr (41) Mercy R. Stevens (44) Mrs. Emily W. Stockdale (18) Mrs. Carrie S. Thomas (44) Mrs. Elisha Tibbits (10, 34) Mrs. Lora A. Underbill (39, 18) James B. Walkley (41) Miss Miriam K. Wallis (20) Mrs. Edmund Cottle Weeks (38) Mrs. Emmeline B. Wells (44) Miss Elizabeth A. Wilbur (19) Charles G. Finney Wilcox (45) Mrs. Elizabeth Wilcox (44) Mrs. B. S. Wilkins (34) Laura N. Williams (44) Lily Wostcnholm (44) Mrs. Daniel R. Wood (34) 14 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF GENEALOGY PAPERS PRESENTED The following papers were read : "Genealogical Kecords of the Maori of New Zealand," by Elsdon Best, Wellington Philosophical Society, Wellington, New Zealand. "Genealogy and Family Name Origins of the Chinese Race," by Kiang Shao Chuan Kang-Hu. "Genealogy of the Native Hawaiians," by Bruce Cartwright Jr., Ph. B., of Honolulu. . "The Relationship Between Genealogy and Eugenics," by Paul Popenoe, American Genetic Association, Editor of "Journal of Heredity." "The Study of Genealogy and Its Place in the Affairs of Human Society," by Charles G. Finney Wilcox of Brooklyn, N. Y. "Genealogical Research Among Descendants of Mayflower Im- migrants," by Herbert Folger of the Society of Mayflower Descend- ants in the State of California. The following papers, prepared for the Congress, were ordered printed with the other proceedings as they were either not received in time or for some other reason could not be included in the pro- gram as presented : "The House Restored," by Marian Longfellow of The Descend- ants of Robert Bartlet, Esq., of Plymouth, Massachusetts, Inc. "Genealogical Research in Denmark," by Th. Hauch-Fausboll, Dansk Genealogisk Institut, Copenhagen. The addresses delivered at the Commemorative Session at Re- cital Hall, Exposition Grounds, were : President's Address, by Mr, Frank H. Pettingell, President of the Congress. Address of Welcome and Presentation of Medal by Mr. Colvin B. Brown of the Board of Directors of the Panama-Pacific International Exposition. Response and Acceptance of IMedal by Mr. Henry B. Phillips of the California Genealogical Society. CLARENCE EDWARD rHEA_D SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS 15 INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION Perhaps the most important action of the Congress was that looking to the perpetuation of its activities through the organiza- tion of an International Genealogical Federation, the objects of which will be: a. To collect, preserve and render available genealogical and historical records. b. To procure legislation establishing adequate systems of collecting and maintaining vital statistics and records. c. To secure the establishment of an international bureau for the registration of pedigrees, coats-of-arms, etc. It is proposed that such Federation include the following classes of membership : a. Genealogical organizations. b. Historical organizations. c. Family associations. d. Individual membership. The details of the actual organization of this Federation are entrusted to the following Organization Committee, which was given full power to act on behalf of the Congress, including power to add to the membership of the committee : Mr. Henry B. Phillips, delegate from the National Genealogical Society, Chairman. Mr. Orra E. Monnette, delegate from the Huguenot Society of America. Mr. B. M. Newcomb, delegate from the Society for the Preserva- tion of New England Antiquities. Mr. Clarence E. Heald, delegate from the Pike Family Associa- tion, Secretary and Custodian. 16 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF GENEALOGY RESOLUTIONS A resolution was passed memorializing the United States Gov- ernment to the following effect : To take such steps as may be necessary to establish and maintain a National Bureau of Registration of Vital Statistics, either by enlarging the scope of the Bureau of the Census or the establishment of a new department. Such Bureau to make and file copies of all authentic vital statistics now on record in the various counties of the entire country. That the Congress of the United States enact laws mak- ing compulsory the registration of adequate vital statistics throughout the country. A committee was appointed with Dr. Alvin Plummer of San Francisco at its head, to further the principles expressed in the above resolution. With a special view to making the registration of voters of more value to the searcher of genealogical data, the following resolution was adopted: Resolved, That it is the sense of this Congress that all Public Record blanks be so changed as to provide actual date and place of birth, marriage and death, father's name and mother's maiden name wherever age and country or state is now required. The following resolution was passed, exemplifying the atti- tude of the Congress toward the use of genealogical data in working out the problems of eugenics: Resolved, That one of the objects of the International Genealogical Federation shall be the collection and pres- ervation of genealogical data for eugenic purposes and that the committee of organization of said International Genealogical Federation is hereby instructed to provide for the collection and preservation of said genealogical data for eugenic purposes. SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS 17 VOTES OF THANKS Duriug the sessions of the Congress the following Votes of Thanks were passed (given in chronological order) : To Mr. Kiang Shao Chuan Kang-IIu for preparing, and Mr. Henry H. Phillips for rendering into English, an able paper on "Genealogj^ and Family Name Origins of the Chinese Race." To the California Genealogical Society for their delightful en- tertainment of the visiting delegates at the Fairmont Hotel on Thursday, July 29, 1915. To ^fr. H. B. Phillips and his able co-workers v/ho have prepared the programs and arranged the sessions of this Congress. To ^Ir. Frank H. Pettingell, the President, and ^Nlr. Clarence E. Heald, the very efficient Secretary of the Congress for the able and courteous manner in which they have managed the affairs of the Congress. To Miss Sarah Louise Kimball, one of the foremost genealo- gists of the Pacific Coast, for her distinguished work in preparing the way for this Congress and aiding in the success of its sessions. To all those in foreign lands who had conti'ibuted papers, with instrui!tions to the Secretary to write them notifying them of this action and expressing our appreciation. To Professor N. Murakami for his courteous promise to con- tribute an article on Genealogy in Japan to be printed with the proceedings of the Congress. FINANCIAL The money required to meet current expenses of the Congress was raised by means of an assessment of $1.00 on each of the societies or organizations represented ; thirty-four out of the forty- six paid this on the day the assessment was announced. 18 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF GENEALOGY LIST OF OFFICERS AND COMMITTEES The officers and committees of the Congress were as follows : OFFICERS. President — Mr. Frank Hervey Fettingell of Los Angeles, Cal. Secretary — Mr. Clarence Edward Heald of San Francisco, Cal. Assistant Secretary — Miss Carlie Inez Tomlinson of San Fran- cisco, Cal. COMMITTEES. On Credentials — Clarence E, Heald, Chairman. Miss C. I. Tomlinson. 0// L'rogratu — Henry B. Phillips, Chairman. B. M. Newcomb. Mrs. Susa Y. Gates. Mrs. Lora A. W. Underhill. Miss Jessie F. Emery. On Ways and Means — Joseph F. Smith Jr., Chairraai Willis M. Dixon. Norman S. Frost. Mrs. Isaac N. Chapman. T. Edward Bond. On Permanent Organization — Orra E. Monnette, Chairman. B. M. Newcomb. Joseph F. Smith Jr. Mrs. Lora A. W. I'nderhiil. Mrs. W. D. Mansfield. Mrs. Susa Y. Gates. Mrs. B. S. Wilkins. Mrs. I. N. Chapman. T. A. Perkins. On Estahlishment of a National Bureau of Vital Statistics — Dr. Alvin Plummer, Chairman. Mrs. Susa Y. Gates. Henry B. Phillips. Clarence E. Heald. Orra E. Monnette. T. A. Perkins. B. H. Newcomb. SLWniARY OF PKOCKEniNGS IJ> ORGANIZATION COMMITTEE OF INTERNATIONAL GENEALOGICAL FEDERATION. HENRY BYRON PHILLIPS, Chairman T>elegate from the National genealogical Society. ORRA EUGENE MONNETTE Delegate from the Huguenot Society of America. BETHUEL MERRITT NEWCOMB Delegate from the Society for the Preservation of New England Antiquities Its Secretary and Custodian is; CLARENCE EDWARD HEALD 1215 Van Ness Avenue, San Francisco, Cal., U. S. A. 20 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF GENEALOGY INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF GENEALOGY SAN FRANCISCO CIVIC AUDITORIUM, HALL F. WEDNESDAY, JULY 28, 1915, 10:30 A. M. The Congress was called to order by Mr. Henry Byron Phillips, President of the California Genealogical Society, who introduced Mr. Orra Eugene Monnette as Temporary Chairman. Mr. Monnette took the chair, and named ]\Ir. Clarence E. Heald, Temporary Secretary, and Miss C. I. Tomlinson, Temporary As- sistant Secretary. In a brief and appropriate address Mr. Monnette then extended a warm greeting to all the delegates, informing them that no hard and fast program had been laid down for their proceedings, but that on the contrary the work of the Congress lay entirely in their own hands. A motion was made to the effect that the temporary organization be made permanent ; Mr. Monnette declared that while he appre- ciated the honor conferred upon him, it would be impossible for him to accept the Presidency of the Congress because his business engagements would permit him to remain in the city but two of the three days set for its sessions. Mr. H. B. Phillips moved that Mr. Frank Hervey Pettingell be named President. The motion was seconded by Mr. Norman S. Frost, and carried unanimously. Mr. Pettingell took the chair and after expressing his appre- ciation of the action of the Congress called upon Mr. James A. Barr, Director of Congresses of the Panama-Pacific International Exposition, for a few remarks. Mr. Barr told briefly of the inception and growth of the plans for this Congress, stating that sixty societies had notified him that they had named delegates. He also declared this to be the first International Congress of Genealogy ever held in America, as well as the first genealogical meeting to receive recognition from an in- ternational exposition and a place on its program. Among the 852 bodies meeting here during the Exposition year twenty-five are genealogical organizations. On behalf of the Exposition he extended a cordial invitation to all to visit and study the World University exemplified by the Exposition itself. ORRA EUC^ENE MONNETTE MINUTES OF SESSIONS 21 "Hon. Joseph F. Smith Jr. was ihcn introdneed to the Congress. He expressed the thanks of tlie dele^ati'S to tlie Oencaloj^ical Society of California and to the Panama-Pacific International Ex- position for the invitation to all genealogical societies to gather here to further their mutual interests. He stated that one impor- tant thing to be considered was the system of arranging and re- cording genealogical data. There are now in use numy systems and classifications; some difficult and some simple. A uniform system would be a great advance in placing genealogical research on a better basis. Since we owe to our ancestors all that we are, there is due reason why we should honor and study them even though occasionally there may be one who is not entirely a credit to the family. Mr. H. B. Phillips moved that :\rr. C. E. Heald be named Secre- tary of the Congress and Miss C. I. Tomlinson Assistant Secretary. The motion was seconded by I\Ir. N. S. Frost and carried. The President announced the appointment of ]\Tr. Heald and i\liss Tomlinson as Committee on Credentials. It was moved by ]Mr. J. M. Eddy that the list of delegates pre- pared by the Director of Congresses of the Exposition be tem- porarily accepted as official, the same to be subject to proper altera- tions and additions by the Credentials Committee. The motion was seconded by Mr. Phillips and carried. The Secretary then proceeded to call the roll of the delegates. Those present received appropriate badges. Of the sixty societies on the official list, twenty-eight were represented by delegates present; four moi-e societies were added to the nuin1)er tlirough delegates recognized by the Credentials Committee, and one, the National Wonum's Relief Society of Utah, by vote of the Congress upon motion of Mrs. Elisha Tibbits, seconded by Mr. N. S. Frost. This raised the total number of societies represented by delegates at the first session of the ('ongress to thirty-three. The President named as a Program Coiumittee : Mr. H. B. Phillips, Chairman. Mr, B. M. Newcomb. !Mrs. Susa Y. Gates. ^Irs. Lora A. W. Cnderhill. ]\[iss Jessie F. Emery. Upon motion duly seconded the meeting adjourned until 2 :30 P. M. At the first session of the Congress, about three hundred per- sons were present, a number of them, although not delegates, being prominent genealogists. 22 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF GENEALOGY AFTERNOON SESSION, JULY 28, 1915. 2:30 P. M. The Congress was called to order by President Pettingell. Mr. H. B. Phillips presented a report from the Program Com- mittee covering the schedule of meetings and the papers to be presented. Sessions are regularly to be held at 10 :00 A. M. and 2:30 P. M. The President announced a Committee on Ways and Means as follows : Hon. Joseph F. Smith Jr., Chairman. Mr. Willis Milnor Dixon. Mr. Norman S. Frost. Mrs. Isaac N. Chapman. Mr. T. Edward Bond. A paper on "Genealogy and Family Name Origins of the Chinese Race" was read by Mr. H. B. Phillips. This paper was originally written in Chinese characters by Mr. Kiang Shao Chuan Kang-Hu and the translation made with the aid of Mr. Phillips. This paper was very impressive for its concise and able presentation of its big subject, covering the essential facts very completely. It was moved that we extend a vote of thanks to the author, and that i\Ir. Phillips be authorized to communicate to him our appreciation. This motion was amended to also express our thanks to Mr, Phillips for transcribing and reading this paper. The amendment being acceptable to the maker of the motion was incor- porated therewith, and the motion as amended was seconded and carried. Upon motion duly seconded the meeting adjourned until 10:00 A. M., July 29, the members proceeding to the Grove street entrance of the Auditorium, where a group photograph was taken. MORNING SESSION, JULY 29, 1915. The Congress was called to order by President Pettingell at 10 :30 A. M. A report from the Committee on Ways and Means was pre- sented by its chairman, Hon. Joseph F. Smith Jr. The committee recommended that the immediate expenses of the Congress b t/3 o a M)'m a « 2 o J3 « -^ S, -, O ra ni « p •- w |v; E-, CL, Oh ;z; !i! t^ •^ - s OS .a OS a c ^ 11 r^ C£ S3^ 35 5 s (C g „•- ^i r& .^ _-! i^ -ei ri oi oi rt pS H ^H r^ ^ S! « p .i: rt 9 5 c rt ^ ci '-^ 2 u r 01 -*-j HH 2 iJj V 3 s C "ti • f1| ce ^ M Vh .« QJ I c 5 3 £ Cj J3 3 o S £ married TakahiCoL L 3 a »- »;H ^ ^ S •H -3 -S .2 - « .2 3 "- ^; H f:-^ 3 « V cS .. 18 bj3 ri f3 (D 3 .« -C « ci 3 PI b^'A 3 ■*-^ o u > a;' o c (1) J5 -. ctj » O a; -^ «S a-' ^ - - _ V o ctf -[AORI 57 TABLE 4. Shows descent of Waikawa from Tol. Toi 1. Rongoueroa 2. Whatonga 3. Tara Tiwhana-a-rangi Hine-one Tah\> Te Raugi-tu-pewa Te Rangi-tu-maroro Tuku-po 10. Turia Hine-akau Rangi-i-hiia Hapai-te-rangi Te Rangi-tuatahi 15. Ira-karako, Kura-whango Pouri Matua-te-rangi Hine-i-tukia 20. Whakairi-te-rangi Tu-awhio Tama-i-waha Te Huinga Te Whakararo 25. Raurangi Taketake Te Ngaere ^ 28. Te Manihera Naomi 30. Maota Waikawa 58 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF GENEALOGY GENEALOGY OF THE NATIVE HAWAIIANS. By BRUCE CART^VRIGHT. JR. From Hawaiian genealogies, handed down orally for hundreds of years, the history of the race has been traced. It shows us that the Hawaiians are a very primitive people. About the fifth century A. D. they came to Hawaii, where they remained unknown until the eleventh century, when they were visited by several parties from the groups to the south, from the ]\Iarquesas, Samoan and Society Islands. Active intercourse was maintained for the space of six generations, when the Hawaiians were again isolated until their rediscovery by Captain James Cook in 1778. All the inhabitants of Hawaii were supposed to have descended from the same ancestors, Wakea, the male, and Papa, the female. After the lapse of time a King was chosen to rule over the people, and others were chosen to assist the King, who were the chiefs. The genealogies of the Kings and Chiefs were considered of great importance and were memorized by genealogists who were supported b}' the nobility and held honored and important posi- tions under the Crown. The marriage ceremony commonly consisted of the groom throw- ing a piece of kapa (native cloth) over the bride in the presence of witnesses, usually the bride's relatives. After this brief cere- mony a feast took place in celebration of the event. Great care was exercised in the choice of the first wife of a chief of high rank. She must be of the same or higher rank so that their children would be of high rank. Search was made into the pedigree of both the man and woman by the genealogists before they were allowed to marry and the ceremony was not permitted to proceed until the genealogist approved of the pedigrees. A suitable mate for a chief of high rank was his sister. If there were any children, they were considered chiefs of the highest rank. They were called "Ninau Pio" and were so sacred that all who came into their presence must prostrate themselves. For this reason these chiefs went around at night so that the people would not have to stop work and fall to the ground in an attitude of worship should they be seen. If a chief had no sister to marry, other members of his immediate family were considered suitable, such as his cousins, aunts, and, in some cases, even his mother. The descent w^as usually traced through the female for the simple reason that there could be no question as to whom the mother was. GENEALOGY OF THE HAWAIIANS 59 After children were born to this first marriage, a husband or a Avife miglit take as many partners as they chose of any rank and the children begotten of these other unions would be called '•Kaikaina" and they were recognized as the younger brothers and sisters of the great chief, the first child, and in time would become his advisers or the ministers of his government. In order to show how complex relationships became I will refer to Fornander, Volume II, page 130 : Ka-lani-kau-lele-i-a-iwi was the daughter of Kea-kea-lani- wahine, a Queen of the Island of Hawaii and a woman of the high- est rank. She became Queen, sharing the throne with her half- brother and husband, Keawe. She had four husbands of whom there is record, each one of whom had several wives, who in turn had several husbands. Most of us will acknowledge that it would be quite a task to segregate the second generation of this household and classify them as to their relationships with one another. Her half-brother Keawe is the reputed head of many families in Hawaii proud of their chiefly descent. Keaua, the reputed father of the great Kamehameha, was a grandson of both King Keawe and his sister. Queen Ka-lani-kau-lele-i-a-iwi, his father being Ka-lani-keeaumoku, their son. The mother of Kamehameha was Kekuiapoiwa II, a chiefess of the highest rank and daughter of Haae, who was the son of Queen Kalani-kau-lele-ia-iwi by another husband other than her brother Keawe, the King. This second husband was Kauauamahi, a very high chief from the district of Kohala. In showing the relationships of the third generation from Keawe it would be necessary to make a chart showing all the wives of all the husbands, when we would find such a multitude and such combinations that we would be forced to start a separate chart for each individual. The Hawaiian Historical Society at its annual meeting in Janu- ary, 1914, authorized me to chose a committee to look into the advisability of the society starting a genealogical department. I invited Mr. Edger Henriques and Mr. Gerrit P. Wilder to join me as a committee, and after going into the question from all points of view we reported that it was our opinion that no time should be " lost in starting a genealogical department for the Hawaiian Historical Society. It would seem a simple matter to trace foreign families in Hawaii since foreigners began to arrive after the report on Cook's voyage was made public, and in only a few cases would it be necessary to go back further than 1790, but such we find not to be the case. The early arrivals in Hawaii were men who kept no records and it was not until the arrival of the missionaries in 1820 that a foreign woman came to the Islands and permanent records of events were kept. 60 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF GENEALOGY GENEALOGICAL CHARTS. By SARAH LOUISE RIMBALL. OF THE CrAI.IFOKNIA OENK ALOOIC A L SOeiETY. During the afternoon session of Thursday, July 29, there was an exhibition of genealogical charts, a brief summary of which follows: Chart 1.— Showing European ancestry for several centuries of George Washington's ancestor, Col. George Reade, who came from England to Virginia in 1637. Prepared by Plenry Byron Phillips. Chart 2. — A comparative study of three lines of ancestry trac- ing through the French, Scandinavian and Hawaiian royal lines to Adam. Prepared by Henry Byron Phillips. Chart 3. — "The Fittest," showing one ancestress, Isabel de Vermandois (granddaughter of Henry I, King of France), for rulers and leaders in Europe and America. Prepared by Sarah Louise Kimball. Chart 4. — Showing Isabel de Vermandois as ancestress of all reigning monarchs in Europe, except certain Balkan States and Turkey, as well as of thirteen presidents of the United States. Prepared by Sarah Louise Kimball. Charts 5-20. — A series of studies of American families, by Sarah Louise Kimball, as follows : Ludlow-Carter, of Virginia, producing : 3 signers of the Declaration of Independence, 2 presi- dents, 7 governors, 3 U. S. senators, 1 minister and 1 ambassador to England, 1 ambassador to Italy, and the commander-in-chief C. S. A. Taylor, of Virginia, producing : 2 presidents, 2 governors, 1 member of Congress, 1 U. S. senator, 1 minister to ^lexico and the wife of the president of the Confederacy. Lee, of Virginia, producing: 1 president, 1 U. S. senator, 1 state senator, 1 member of Congress, 1 representative to the Continental Congress, 1 acting governor, 4 celebrated generals. GENEALOGICAL CHARTS 61 Laiharn-Dungan-Clarke, of Rhode Island, producinsr: 10 governors, 14 deputy governors. Lawrence, of New England, producing : 1 president, 2 governors, 1 lieutenant governor, 4 mem- bers of Congress, 1 secretary of war, ] U. S. sena- tor, 2 state senators, 3 mayors, 1 rear admiral U. S. N., 1 justice Supreme Court, 1 commodore U. S. N., 1 Indian commissioner, 3 diplomatic rep- resentatives, 1 benefactor, 1 orator. Arnold, of Rhode Island, producing: 5 governors, 2 chief justices, 1 U. S. senator, 1 signer Declaration of Independence, 1 commodore U. S. N., 1 celebrated general in the Revolution. Greene, of Rhode Island, producing: 3 governors, 2 lieutenant-governors, 1 deputy gover- nor, 3 U. S. senators, 1 attorney general, 1 U. S. consul, 2 historians. 1 author, 1 celebrated general in the Revolution. Field, of New England, producing : 2 justices Supreme Court U. S., 2 chief justices. Su- preme Court of California, 1 chief justice Supreme Court of Iowa, 1 U. S. senator. 1 attorney general. 1 author, who compiled law codes adopted by 27 States, the layer of the Atlantic cable, 1 captain of industry, 1 governor of Newfoundland, Jamaica, etc, Clinton, of New York, producing: 1 vice-president, 2 governors. 1 brigadier general, 1 commander-in-chief in the Revolution. Richardson, of South Carolina, producing: 6 governors. Wanton, of Rhode Island, producing: 4 governors. Wentworth, of New Hampshire, producing: 2 governors, 2 lieutenant-governors, 4 councillors, 12 members of state legislatures, 1 delegate to the Continental Congress, 1 member of Congress, 1 mayor, 3 authors. 62 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF GENEALOGY Dudley, of Massachusetts, producing : 5 governors, 1 justice U. S. Supreme Court, 1 univer- sity president, 1 signer Declaration of Indepen- dence, 1 editor historical publication, 1 noted clergy- man, 1 orator. Edwards, of New England, producing : 1 president, 1 vice-president, 1 governor, 1 chief jus- tice. 2 founders law schools, 16 presidents of uni- versities, etc., 1 author. Kimltal], of New England, producing: 1 vice-president, 2 governors, 1 lieutenant-governor, 14 state senators, 51 members of state legislatures^ 2 justices, 1 chief justice. 1 attorney general, 1 U. S. district attorney, 11 captains of industry, 1 univer- sity president, 1 university chancellor, 2 founders of academies, 1 president school for girls, 6 authors. 6 publishers, 1 sculptor, 1 explorer, 1 state chemist, 1 member state constitutional convention, 1 rear admiral U. S. N., 1 director U. S. Mint, 5 U. S, consuls, 1 chief signal officer U, S. A., 1 U, S. cus- toms expert. Kimball, of New England, producing : 152 soldiers in the Revolutionary war, of v>-hoTu 27 were officers. Chart 21. — A study on one American family, showing en;inent descendants within 150 years after the death of the ast-endant. prepared by Hon. Boutwell Dunlap, as follows: Johti Presfon, of Virginia, producing: 31 men, among whom there were 1 vice-president: 4 cabinet officers; 1 Confederate cabinet officer; U. S. senators; 1 Confederate senator; 5 governors (one of 2 territories) ; 15 eongressaien ; 1 member of Continental Congress; 1 Confederate congress- man; 3 foreign ministers; 2 generals in war of 1812; 4 generals.; 5 Confederate generals. 19 women, among whom were the wives of 1 presi- dent; 1 cabinet officer; 5 U. S. senators; 7 gover- nors ; 5 congressmen ; 2 foreign ministers ; 1 ad- miral; 1 general in war of 1812; 4 generals; 4 Con- federate generals. GENEALOGY AND EUGENICS THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENEA- LOGY AND EUGENICS. By PAUL POPENOE. OF THK AMKRICAN GEXKTIC SOCIETY. EDITOR OF "journal, of HEREDITY" Scientific plant breeders today have learned that their success often depends on the care with which they study the genealogy of their plants. Livestock breeders admit that their profession is on a sure scientific basis only to the extent that the genealogy of the animal used is known. Human genealogy is one of tJie oldest manifestations of man's intellectual activity, but until recently it has been subservient to sentimental purposes, or pursued from historical or legal motives. Biology has had no place in it. Genealogy, however, has not altogether escaped the re-examina- tion which all sciences received after the Darwinian movement revo- lutionized modern thought. Numerous v.'ays have been pointed out in which the science — for genealogy h certainly a science— could be •brought into line with the nev/ way of looking at man and his world. The field of genealogy has already been invaded at many points by biologists, seeking the furtherance of their ov\-n aims. I propose to discuss briefij'' the relations between the conven- tional genealogy and the modern application of biological principles to every-day life vrhich, as it is here viewed, may be broadly de- scribed by the name Eugenics, "good breeding." It may be that genealogy could become an even more valuable branch of human kuov^'ledge that it now is, if it were more closely aligned with biology. In order to tlirow light on this possibility, we must inquire : (1) What is genealogy? (2) What does it now attempt to do? (3) What faults appear, from the engenist's standpoint, to t'xist in its present methods? (4) What additions should be made to its present methods? (5) What can be expected of it, aft«r it is revised in accord- ance with the ideas of the eugenist? The answer to the first question, "Wliat is genealogy?" need not detain me long, for you are already more familiar with it than I am. Genealogy may be envisaged from several points. It serves history. It has a legal function, which is probably of more 64 IXTERXATIOXAL CONGRESS OF GENEALOGY consequence abroad than in America. It has social significance, in bolstering family pride and creating a feeling of family solidarity — this is perhaps its chief office in the United States. It has, or can have, biological significance, and this in two ways: either in relation to the pure science or the applied science. In connection with pure science, its function is to furnish us means for getting a knowledge of the laws of heredity. In application, its function is to furnish a knowledge of the inherited characters of any given individual, in order to make it possible for the individual to marry wisely. It is obvious that the use of genealogy in the applied science of eugenics is dependent on the preceding use of it in the pure branch of the science ; for marriage matings which take account of heredity cannot be made unless the laws of heredity have previously been discovered. True Worth of Genealogy. The historical, social, legal and other aspects of genealogy do not concern the present paper. I shall discuss only the biological aspect : firstly, because I am incompetent to discuss the others ; and secondly, because I hold that the biological conception has by far the greatest true value, accepting the criterion of value as that which furthers the progressive evolution of the race. By this cri- terion, I believe the historical, legal and social aspects of genealogy are of secondary importance ; the greatest worth it can possibly have is in co-operation with biology. This definition may appear to be a begging of the question of my whole paper; I shall attempt to justify it farther on. (2) Genealogy now too often pretends to be an end in itself. It can, of course, be looked upon as an end in itself, but I believe that it will be recognized as a science of much greater value to the world if it is admitted to be not an end, but a means to a far greater end that it alone can supply. It has indeed, been contended, even by such an authority as Ottokar Lorenz,' who is often considered tlie father of modern scientific genealogy, that a knowledge of his own ancestry will tell each individual exactly what he himself is. This, as I under- stand it, is the basis of Lorenz' valuation of genealogy. It is a step in the right direction; but (3) The present methods of genealogy are inadequate to sup- port such a claim. Its methods are still based on the historical, legal and social functions, and it has not yet begun, save in a few instances, to realize its almost incomparable opportunity for the betterment of mankind. Let me indicate just a few of the faults of method in genealog,y, which the eugenist most deplores: (a) The information which is of most value is exactly that which genealogy does not furnish. Dates of birth, death and mar- riage of an ancestor are of interest, but rarelj'^ of real biological GEXEALOGY AND EUGENICS 65 value. Tilt' facts about that ancestor which vitally concern his living descendant are the facts of his character, physical and mental ; and these facts are given in very few genealogies. Data Usually Incomplete. (b) Genealogies are coniiiionly too incomplete to be of real value. Sometimes they deal only with the direct male line of ascent — what animal breeders call the tail-m.ail. In this case it is not too much to say that th^y are quite devoid of genuine value. Fortunately American genealogies do not often go to this extreme, but it is not uncommon for them to deal only with the direct ancestors of the individual, omitting all brothers and sisters of those ancestors. Although this simplifies the work of the geneal- ogist inmiensely. it deprives it of value to a corresponding degree. (c) As the purpose of genealogy in this country has been largely social, it is to be feared that in too many eases discredit- able ciata have been tacitly omitted from the records. The anti- social individual, the feeble-minded, the insane, the alcoholic, the "generally no-count," has been glossed over. Such a lack of candor is* not in accord with the scientific spirit, and makes one uncertain, in the use of genealogies, to what extent he is really getting all the facts. There are few families of any size which have not one such member or more, not many generations removed. To attemjit to conceal the fact is an action of doubtful ethical propriety; but from the eugenist's point of view, at any rate, it is a falsification of records that must be regarded with great disapproval. (d) Even if the information it furnishes were more com- plete, human genealogy would not justify the claims sometimes made for it as a science, because, to use a biological phrase, "the matings are not controlled." We see the results of a certain experiment, but we cannot interpret them unless we know w-hat the result would have been had the precedent conditions been varied in this way or in that way. We can make these controlled experiments in our plant and animal breeding; we have been making them by the thousand, by the hundred thousand, for many years. We cannot make them in human society. Of course, we don't want to: but the point on which I wish to insist is that the biological meaniug of human history, the real import of genealogy can only be interpreted in the light of modern plant and animal breeding. It is absolutely- necessary that g-enealogy go into partnership with genetics, the general science of heredity: that it do not consider itself cheapened by an alliance with the plant and animal breeders. If a spirit of false pride lead it to hold Bloof from these experiments, it will make slow progress. The interpretation of genealogy iu the light of modern research in heredity, through the experinumtal breeding of plants and animals is full "of hope; without such light, it is almost hopeless. 66 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF GENEALOGY Genealogists are usually proud of their pedigrees; they usually have a right to be. But I beg of you, do not let your pride lead you to scorn the pedigrees of some of the peas, and corn and snap- dragons, and sugar beets, and bulldogs, and Shorthorn cattle, with which genetists have been working during the last generation ; for these humble pedigrees may throw more light on your ov>-n than a century of research in purely human material. Biology Necessary. Your science will not have full meaning and full value to you unless you bring yourselves to look on men and women as organisms subject to the same laws of heredity and variation as other living things. Biologists were not long ago told that it was essential for them to learn to think like genealogists. It is excellent advice, and if I were speaking to biologists, I would repeat it. As I am speaking to genealogists, I say with equal conviction that it is essential for genealogists to learn to think like biologists. For the purpose of eugenics, neither science is complete without the other; and I think it is not invidious for me to say that biologists liave been quicker to recognize this than have genealogists. The Golden Age of your science is yet to come. (4) In addition to the correction of these faulty methods, there are certain extensions of genealogical method which could advantageously be m^ade without great difficulty, I think. (a) More written records should be kept, and less dependence placed on oral communication. The obsolescent family Bible, with its chronicle of births, deaths and marriage'^, is an institution of too great value to be given up, in more ways than one. In the TTnited States we have not the advantage of much of the machinery of state registration which European genealogy enjoys, and it should be a matter of pride with every family to keep its own archives. (b) Family trees should be kept in more detail, including all brothers and sisters in every family, no matter at what age they (lied, and including as many collaterals as possilile. This means more work for the genealogist, but the results will repay him. (c) More family traits should be marked. Those at present recorded are mostly of a social or economic nature and are of little real significance after the death of their possessor. But the traits of his mind and body are likely to go on to his descendants in- definitely. These are the facts of his life on which we should focus our attention. How this can be most conveniently done I shall discuss later. (d) More pictorial data should be added. Photographs of the members of the family, at all ages, should be carefully pre- served. They are often of inestimable value. Measurements equally deserve attention. The door jamb is not a satisfactorj'- place for recording the heights of children, particularly in this day when GENEALOGY AXD EUGENICS 67 real estate so often changes hands. Complete anthropometric meas- urements, such as every member of the Young IMen's Christian Association, most college students, and many other people are obliged to undergo once or periodically, should be placed on file. (e) Pedigrees should be traced upward from a living indi- vidual, rather than down-ward from some hero long since dead. Of course, the ideal method would be to combine these two, or to keep duplicate pedigrees, one a table of ascendants and the other of descendants, in the same stock. Tliis plan is not too laborious to use, in many cases; the coni])ined tables, which show all the relatives of an individual, although attractive to the investigator, are too complicated ever to become popular, I suspect. The Ideai/ Genealogy. Genealogical data of the kind Ave need, however, cannot be reduced to a mere table or family tree. The ideal genealogy, as described by Davenport," starts with a whole fraternity — the indi- vidual who is making it, and all his brothers or sisters. It describes fully each member of this fraternity. "It then describes each mem- ber of the fraternity to which the father belongs and gives some account of their consorts (if married) and their children. It does the same for the maternal fraternity. Next it considers the fra- ternity to which the father's father belongs, considers their con- sorts, their children and grandchildren, and it does the same for the fraternities to which the father's mother belongs. It were more significant thus to study in detail the behavior of all the available product of the germ-plasras involved in the makeup of the first fraternity than to weld a chain or two of links through six or seven generations. A genealogy constructed on such a plan would give a clear picture of heredity, would be useful for the prediction of the characteristics of the generations yet unborn, and would, indeed, aid in bringing about better matings. " (5) With these changes, genealogy would become the study of heredity, rather than the study of lineage. Perhaps you will not all agree that this would be a desirable change; but I think if you can once get the biological, the eugenic point of view, you will realize that any other field for genealogy is too narrow. I do not mean to say that the study of heredity is nothing more than applied genealogy. As we understand it nowadays, it includes mathematical and biological territory which must always be foreign to genealogy. I shoidd prefer to put it this way : That in so far as man is concerned, heredity is the interpretation of genealogy, and eugenics the application of heredity. But I do mean to say that genealogy should give its students a vision of the species as a great group of ever-changing, inter-related organisms, a great network originating in the obscurity of the past, stretching forward into the obscurity of the future, every individual in it organically related 68 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF GENEALOGY to every other, and all of them the heritors of the past in a xer\' real sense. No one is so well fitted as the genealogist to realize the solemn grandeur of Weissman's doctrine that the germ-plasm is continu- ous from the beginning of existence on this world, to the now un- seen end. Our bodies, as you all have heard, are made up of two parts : this mass of highly differentiated cells which represents the man or woman, and which are destined to die when the individual shall have completed his three score years and ten, more or less; and within, the little mass of germ-cells, the undifferentiated, im- mortal, or, at least, potentially immortal carriers of the heritage of the race. Generation after generation this germ-plasm goes on dividing; from parent to child it is passed on, unchanged save by the addition at each generation of a new line from the second parent. The body dies, but if the individual has left posterity, the germ-plasm lives after him. Immortality is, in this sense at least, a very real thing to the biologist; and I believe the genealogist would see a new meaning in his work if he kept the same conception in mind. Importance op Individuals. Genealogy does well in giving a realization of the importance of the family, but it errs if it bases this teaching altogether on the family pride in some remote ancestor who, even though he bore the family name and was a prodigy of virtues, probably counts for little or nothing in the individual's make-up today. Let me take a con- crete though wholly imaginary illustration: what man would not feel a certain satisfaction in being a lineal descendant of George Washington? And yet, if we place the Father of his Country at only four removes from the living individual, nothing is more certain than that our hypothetical living individual had fifteen other ancestors in George Washington's generation, any one of whom may play as great or greater a part in his ancestry; and so remote are they all that, on statistical grounds alone, it is calculated' that the contribution of George Washington to the ancestry of our hypothetical living individual would be perhaps not more than one-third of one per cent, of the total. I do not mean to disparage descent from a famous man or woman. It is a matter of legitimate pride and congratulation. But claims for respect made on that ground alone are, from a biological point of view, usually contemptible, if the hero is several generations removed. What Sir Francis Gallon wrote' of the peers of England may, with slight reserves, be given general appli- cation to the descendants of famous people : "An old peerage is a valueless title to natural gifts, except so far as it may have been furbished up by a succession of wise inter- marriages. ... I cannot think of any claim to respect, put forward in modern days, that is so entirely an imposture, as that made by GENEALOGY AND EUGENICS €9 a peer on the ground of descent, Avho has neither been nobly edu- cated, nor has any eminent kinsman within three degrees." But, some one may protest, am I not shattering the very edifice ot" which I am a professed defender, in thus denying the force of heredity? Not at all. I wish merely to emphasize that a man has sixteen great-great-grandparents, instead of one, and that we too often overlook those in the maternal lines, although from a biologi- cal point of view they are every bit as important as those in the paternal lines. And I wish further to emphasize the point that it is the near relatives who, on the whole, represent what we are. The great family which for a generation or two makes unwise marriages, nmst live on its past reputation and see the work of the world done and the prizes carried away by the children of wiser matings. No family can maintain its place merely by the power of inertia. Every Tuarriage that a member of the family makes is a matter of vital euncern to the future of the family: and this is one of the lessons which a broad science of genealogy should inculcate in every youth. Qualifications F(3r Work. Is it practicable to direct genealogy on this slightly different line? As to that, I must allow you to judge; it would be pre- sumptuous for me to express an opinion. Let me recall, however, the qualifications which old Professor William Chauncey Fowler laid down' as essential for a successful genealogist: Love of kindred. Love of investigation. Active imagination. Sound and disciplined judgment. Conscientious regard to truth. A retentive memory. A pleasing style as a writer. With such qualifications one can go far, and I venture to ex- press the opinion that one who possesses them has only to fix his attention upon the biological aspect of genealogy to become con- vinced that his science is only part of a science as long as it ignores eugenics. After all, nothing more is necessary than a slight change in the point of view: and if genealogists can adopt this new point of view, can add to their equipment some familiarity with the fundamental principles of biology as they apply to man and are laid down in the science of eugenics, I am firmly of the conviction that the value of the science of genealogy to the world will be in- creased at least five fold within a generation. Let us examine a little more closely what can be expected from a genealogy with eugenic foundation. First and foremost it will give genetics a chance to advance with rapidity in its study of man. Genetics, the study of heredity, can- not successfully proceed by direct observation in the human species, as it does with plants and rapidly-breeding animals, because the 70 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OP GENEALOGY generations are too long. Less than three generations are of little value for our researches, and even three can rarely be observed to advantage by any one person. Therefore, second-hand information must be used. So far we have gained most of this by sending field- workers — a new kind of genealogist — out among the people in whom we are interested and having them collect the information we wanted, either by study of extant records or by word of mouth. But the w^ritten records of value have been usually negligible in quantity, and oral communication has therefore been our main- stay. It has not been wholly satisfactory. Few people — aside from genealogists — can give even the names of all their great- grandparents, far less can they tell anything of importance about them. It is thus to genealogy that we are driven. Unless we have family records, we can accomplish little. And we cannot get these family records unless you genealogists realize the importance of furnishing them ; for as I have already pointed out, and as I wish to emphasize, genealogies at present available are of little value to genetics because of the inadequacy of the data they furnish. It is only in the case of exceptional families, such as the royal houses of Europe, that enough information is given about each individual to furnish an opportunity for analysis. What could be done if there were more such data available, is brilliantly illustrated by the investigation" by Dr. Frederick Adams Woods of Boston of the reigning houses of Europe. I commend his writing to every geneal- ogist as a source of inspiration as well as information. Hope for Quick Results. To get more such data we must look to the future. We must begin at once to keep our family records in such a way that they will be of the greatest value possible — that they will serve not only family pride, but bigger purposes. It will not take long to get together a large number of family histories in which the idea will be to tell as much as possible, instead of as little as possible, about every individual mentioned. Let me run over a few of the problems on which such genealogies woidd throw light. There is the important problem of the inheritance of longevity. Karl Pearson showed' some years ago, by advanced statistical methods, that longevity is inheritable. Dr. Alexander Graham Bell, whose investigation of the ancestry of congenital deaf persons at Martha's Vineyard and elsewhere, more than a generation ago, was one of the first pieces of biological genealogy executed in this country, and indubitably established the heritable nature of congen- ital deafness' — Dr. Bell is now working on the published history of the Hyde Family in the United States and analyzing it from many points of view to bring to light the ways in which longevity is inherited. It is obvious that this trait is a particularly easy one for investigation, because we need to know nothing more than the GENEALOGY AND EUGENICS 71 dates on which an individual and his parents were born and died. Certainly a genealogy that does not tell so much must be con- sidered defective, and yet of the 8,000 or more persons listed in the Hyde genealogy, there are less than 3,000 for whom these data are complete. Longevity being due more to heredity than to anything els^e, it is obvious, as Dr. Bell has clearly pointed out, that it is a trait of which families may well be proud, if it runs consistently in their stock. And as we eugenists try as far as possible to put our knowledge to practical use, he has also pointed out that it is very desirable for a young man or young woman to marry into a family possessing that trait, since it is a good indication of general soundness of constitution and physical vigor. Families in whose ancestry longevity is a characteristic, can well afford to make the fact known, and take pride in alliance with other worthy families similarly endowed. Such a mating, like with like, is technically known to us as assortative. It used to be supposed that people tended to marry their opposites — the blonde and the brunette, the short and the tall. The use of exact methods in eugenics has demonstrated that the reverse is the case, and that for almost every measureable trait there is distinct evidence of assortative mating." That such a fact is of great value to the race, when the character involved is one of so much importance as longevity, is obvious, and the tendency should be encouraged. Genealogy can give much help in this connection. The Determination of Sex. There are certain phases of the always interesting problem of sex-determination on which genealogy can easily throw light. It has sometimes been asserted that the age of the parents influences the sex of the offspring. We do not know that this is so. but with the help of genealogy we can find out. Another question of great practical importance, on which we seek information, relates to the posterity of men of genius. Is there any truth in the idea that their mental activity tends to use up their vital force, with the result that they are either sterile or leave posterity of mediocre quality ? The idea does not sound con- vincing, but we shall not dismiss it dogmatically, we shall appeal to genealogy for data on which to dispose of it definitely. Of course the alleged fact here must not be confused with the well-known fact of regression, formvdated as a mathematical law by Galton. We know that, on tlie average, the cliildren of superior parents will tend to be inferior to their parents, and the children of parents who are below normal will tend to be a little better than their parents. This is due to the vast bulk of their remote ancestry, most of which is necessarily average, or as the statistician puts it, mediocre. Tlie drag of this more remote heredity tends to pull 72 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF GENEALOGY every child toward mediocrity, or the mean, the average of the race. I must emphasize the fact that this is purely a statistical law, applying only to a quantity of cases, and is frequently untrue for individual cases. The results of early, as compared with late marriage, offer an- other big problem in the solution of which we need your help. That the first-born children are, on the whole, inferior to the brothers or sisters who come after them, has been asserted in recent years, and the assertion has been supported by a good deal of evidence. It is highly important that a much greater body of evidence be brought together on this point, and here genealogy can aid with very little trouble. Unfortunately it is not uncommon to find in the earlier generations of a family tree that the exact birth- rank of the various children is not designated ; nor is account always made of infant deaths or still-births, as should certainly be done in every case. The question of consanguineous marriage is one in w^hich every genealogist is certain to have taken an interest, merely because of the doubling up of a name in his chart, if not from a biological point of view. Until recently the question of the marriage of kin was debated largely by an appeal to dogma. I dare say every genealogist has seen cases where the marriage of first cousins was followed by good progeny, and equally cases where the result was bad. There is plenty of evidence of that sort to be had on both sides. I think it is safe to say that genetics ^has established the status of consanguineous marriage beyond all dispute. It certainly is not bad in itself, although first cousins are forbidden by law to marry in a third of the States of the Union." It simply results in a doubling up of the traits which the two may have in common. If these traits are good, the children get a double dose of them, and will be more highly endowed than their parents. If the traits are bad, the children equally get a double dose of them, and may far surpass their parents in worthlessness, or in the prominence of any particular defect. The general conclusion is clear to us ; marriages between cousins or other relatives of equal consanguinity should not be condemned offhand, but the facts should be taken into consider- ation in each individual case. And it should be borne in mind, of course, that a trait may be latent or concealed in each of the cousins, but come into expression in their children. Although cousin mar- riages, therefore, should be scrutinized closely, we certainly find no reason to forbid them when the contracting parties are of sound stock. Inheritance of Disease. The question of the inheritance of disease is one of great im- portance, which can be studied very easily through genealogy. Of course, no one with a knowledge of modern work in genetics now believes that diseases are actually inherited as such; but there is a GENEALOGY AND EUGENICS 73 jrreat deal of fvidence to show that what the doctors call "diathesis." a predisposing tendenc}' to some disease, may he inherited. Greater research is urgently needed to Hnd the extent and limits of such inheritance, and it is to enlightened genealogy that we must look for the solution of the problem — oi- rather, problems — since there are as many problems as there are diseases, defects and abnormali- ties. We must not draw hasty generalizations, but attack each subject separately. We have pretty good evidence, for instance, that the tubercular diathesis is inherited; that the white plague ravages some families and leaves others untouched ; that almost every city-dweller, at least, is at some time or other during his life in- fected with phtliisis, and whether lie resists or succumbs depends on his heredity. Herein lies guidance for those who would marry; other things being equal let them avoid the weak stocks, the stocks known to be marked with tuberculosis. But because tuberculosis is thus a matter of heredity, it does not necessarily follow that cancer, or any other disease, is. We must take nothing for gi-anted; we must find out by examining man}' families in which a given disease or abnormality occurs. And to do this we must depend on the data of genealogy. Here, however, let me utter an emphatic warning against super- ficial investigation. The medical ])rofession has been particularly hasty, many times, in reporting cases which were assumed to demon- strate heredity. The child was so and so; it was found on inquiry that the father was also so and so : i)o.'it hoc, ergo propter hoc — it must have been heredity. Such a method of investigation is cal- culated to bring the science of genetics into dfsrepute, and might easily ruin the credit of the science of genealogy, should genealogy allow itself to be so misled. As a fact, one case counts for practi- cally nothing as proof of hereditary influence: even half a dozen or a dozen may be of no significance Tliere are two ways in which we can analyze genealogical data to deduce biological laws : one is based on the application of higher mathematics to mass statistics, and needs some hundreds of cases to be of value: the other is by pedigree-study, and needs at least three generations of pedigree, usually covering numerous collaterals, to oit'er any certain results. Not all the findings announced even by professional eugenists have met one or other of these requirements, and to the extent in which they have fallen short, they ai-e being discredited. It is not to be supposed that anyone with a sufficiently complete record of his own ancestr}' would necessarily be able by inspection to deduce from it any important contribution to science. But if enough complete family records are iiuule available, the professional genetist can be called into co-operation, can supplement the human record with his knowledge of the results achieved by carefully controlled animal and jilant bi-eeding, and between them the geneal- ogist and the eugeni.st can in most cases arrive at the truth. That 74 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF GENEALOGY such triitli is of the highest importance to any family, and equally to society as a whole, must be evident. Sex-Linked Inheritance. The whole question of sex-linked inheritance depends for its solution on the extension of genealogical material. It is often said that sons take after their mothers, while daughters tend to resemble their fathers. The Arabs and Hebrews put the same idea a little differently, that a son tends to resemble his maternal uncle. Is there anything in these ideas ? In a small way, there is no mystery about it; we know that certain hereditary traits are sex-linked — that they are carried by one sex but appear in the other. Thus it is rare to find women who are color blind, but a woman who does not show this defect herself may have inherited it from her father, who was visibly affected, and transmit it to her sons, who will also be visibly affected. Extending this principle, it is easy to see that a boy might inherit some traits from his mother, which his father wholly lacked, and that a daughter might similarly re- ceive exclusive traits from her father. Sex-linked heredity in the human race has so far been definitely proved only in regard to color-blindness, hemophilia and a few other abnormal conditions; but with the co-operation of the genealogists it is probable that this condition, as important as it is interesting, will be found to prevail more widely. The problem of the inheritance of fecundity can obviously be settled only through proper genealogical material. It is known that fecundity is to some extent an inherited characteristic, although doubtless affected in man largely hy outward circumstances. The voluntary limitations of births, which has become so widespread during the last generation, of course complicates the study of this subject, but there is, nevertheless, room for much W'Ork of a distinctly practical kind. Obviously one of the easiest ways to im- prove the general average of the race Avould be to have high fecundity in the superior stocks and low fecundity in the inferior ones. It is equalW obvious that if fecundity is associated with inferiority — with feeble-mindedness, for example, that disastrous results will ensue if Nature is allowed to "take its course." The genealogist can contribute indispensable material for this study, and for the general study of the birth-rate in various sections of the community at various periods — a study which is the very foun- dation of applied eugenics. Frederick S. Crum's work'* on published genealogies of New England families shows what can be done in this line. From his material, Crum was able to get figures for 12,722 wives, and he found that the number of children per wife had decreased as follows : GENEALOGY AND EUGENICS 75 1750-1799 6.43 1800-1849 4.94 1850-1869 3.47 1870-1879 2.77 Before 1700 less than 2 per cent, of the wives had only one child each; nowadays the percentage is about 20. The percentage of wives in his records who are absolutely childless has increased as follows : 1750-1799 1.88 1800-1849 4.07 1850-1869 5.91 1870-1879 8.10 He finds, on analysis of the most recent material, that the New England wives of the present day, representing the old Colonial stock, have an average of 1.92 living children each, while the foreign- born mothers in the same districts have 3.01. We are accustomed to point with pit}'' at France as a nation committing race suicide, with more deaths than births; as a fact, the old American stock in New England is dying out more rapidly, through race suicide, than is the population of France. Unless a change takes place the stock which has furnished most of the genealogies, and a large part of the great men and women, of America is doomed to perish. The inheritance of the tendency to produce twins is an inter- esting trait, not without practical as well as theoretical import- ance, which could probably be solved were a sufficient number of well-kept family trees made available for study. It is known that t\vinning is largely a matter of heredity, although the exact man- ner in which the tendency is inherited is still obscure. A good example of the danger of hasty generalization is furnished by the announcement made by some enthusiastic investigator a few years asi'o''' that he had found a number of cases which made it evident to him that the tendency to twinning was due to the father rather than the mother. As ordinary twins are due to the production of two ova instead of one, and as the production of ova can hardly be denied to be a function of the mother rather than the father, the claim is absurd. Yet it is possible that a tendency to twinning might be sex-linked and transmitted through a father to his daugh- ters, as has recently been asserted to be the case with high egg production in hens. Wliatever the solution may be, it still lies hidden in pedigrees which the genealogist will make, or is already making. Data on All Traits Wanted. But this list might grow interminal)ly : for properly kept gene- alogical records wifl furnisli material, without further trouble, for attacking very nearly all the problems in human heredity that are conceivable. The compiler of family histories need only include 76 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF GENEALOGY every physical or mental trait possible, bearing in mind that the genetist will ask two questions about it : Is this characteristic inherited? If so, how? Nor must it be forgotten that we are often as much interested in knowing that a given character is not inherited under certain con- ditions, as that it is. Aside from biology, or that phase of it which we call eugenics, genealogy may also serve medicine, jurisprudence, sociology, statis- tics, and various other sciences as well as the ones which it now serves. But in most cases such service will have a eugenic aspect. The alliance between eugenics and genealogy is one that is certainly foreordained, and it cannot be put off much longer. You may ask what facilities we have for receiving and using pedigrees such as I have been outlining, if they were made up. You are all, of course, familiar with the repositories which the different patriotic societies, the National Genealogical Society, and similar organizations maintain, as well as the collections of the Library of Congress and other great public institutions. Anything deposited in such a place can be found by the investigators, mostly attached to colleges and universities, who are actively engaged in eugenic research. In addition to this there are certain establishments founded for the sole purpose of analyzing genealogies from a biological or statis- tical point of view. The first of these was the Galton Laboratory of the University of London, directed by Karl Pearson. I shall not take time to mention the European institutions, but shall call to your attention tlie two at work in tlie United States. The larger is the Eugenics Record Office at Cold Spring Harbor, Long Island, New York, directed by Dr. Charles B. Davenport and maintained largely through the generosity of Tilrs. E. H. Ilarri- man. Blank schedules are sent to all applicants, in which the pedigree of an individual may be easily set down, with reference particularly to the traits of eugenic importance. When desired the office will send duplicate schedules, one of which may be retained by the applicant for his own files. The schedules filed at the Eugenics' Record Off-ice are treated as absolutely confidential, ac- cess to them being given only to accredited investigators." The second institution of this kind is the Genealogical Record Office, founded and directed by Dr. Alexander Graham Bell, at 1601 Thirty-fifth Street. Northwest. Washington, D. C. This de- votes itself solely to the collection of data regarding longevity, and sends out schedules to all those in whose families there have been individuals attaining the age of 80 or over. It welcomes correspond- ence on the sub.ject from all who know of cases of long life, and endeavors to put the particulars on record, especially with reference to the ancestry and habits of the long-lived individual. GENEALOGY AND EUGENICS 77 Duty of the Individual. Persons intelligently interested in their ancestry might well consider it a duty to society, and to their own posterity, to send for one of the Eugenics' Record Office schedules, fill it out and place it on file there, and to do the same with the Genealogical Record Office, if they are so fortunate as to come of a stock char- acterized by longevity. The filling out of these schedules would be likely to lead to a new viewpoint of genealogy; and when this viewpoint is once gained, I am satisfied that the student will find it adds immensely to his interest in his pursuit. You are all familiar with the charge of long standing, that genealogy is a subject of no use, a fad of a privileged class. I do not need to tell you that such a charge is untrue. Rut T think that genealogy can be made a much more useful science then it now is, and that it will be at the same time more interesting to its followers, if it ceases to look on itself as an end in itself, or solely as a minister to family pride. I hope to see it look on itself as a handmaid of evolution, just as other sciences are coming to do; I hope to see it link arms with the great biological movement of the present day ; I hope to see the two of thetu working in close harmony for the betterment of mankind. So much for the science as a whole. Wliat can the individual do? Nothing better than to broaden his outlook so that he may view his family not as an exclusive entity, centered in a name, dependent on some illustrious man or men of the past : but rather as an integral part of the great fabric of human life, its warp and woof continuous from the dawn of creation and criss-crossed at each generation. Wlien he gets this vision, he will desire to make his family tree as full as possible, to include his collaterals, to note every trait which he can find on record, to preserve the photographs and measurements of his own contemporaries, and to take a pride in feeling that the history of his family is a contribution to human knowledge, as well as to the pride of the family. If the individual genealogist does this, the science of genealogy will become a splendid servant of the whole race, and its influence, not confined to a few. will be felt by all as a positive, dynamic force helping them to lead more worthy lives in the short span allotted to them, and helping them to leave more worthy posterity to carry on the names they bore and the sacred thread of immortality, of which they were for a time the custodians. 'Lorenz, Ottodar — Lehrbuch der gesammten wis.'ienschaftlichen Genealogie. Berlin, W. Hertz, 189 8. 'Davenport. C. B. — Heredity in Relation to Eugenics, p. 240. New Yorit, Henry Holt & Co., 1911. 'Galton's Law of Ancestral Heredity (which is purely statistical in nature and may be quite mi.sleading when applied to individual ca.ses) makes it possible to calculate the contribution of eacli ancestor, all the way to infinity. Pearson has modified it, but as I cite it here merely by way of illustration. I use Galton's orig-inal form for the sake of simplicity. Following is the calcula- tion for the first six generations: 78 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OP GENEALOGY Number of Influence of Influence of Generation Ancestors Generation Individual 1 2 50. 25. 2 4 25. 6.25 3 8 12.5 1.56 4 16 6.25 0.39 5 32 3.125 0.10 6 64 1.5625 0.024 'Galton, Francis — Hereditary Genius, p. 87. London, The Macmillan Co., 1869. 'Fowler, William Chauncey — Conditions of Success in Genealogical Investiga- tions. N. E. Hist, and Gen. Soc, Boston. 1866. 'Woods, Frederick Adams — Mental and Moral Heredity in Royalty. New York, Henry Holt & Co., 1906 ; also The Influence of Monarchs. New York, The Mac- millan Co., 1914. 'Pearson, Karl — Royal Society of London. Phil, Trans., vol. 192A. p. 277 ; Biometrika, vol. I, p. 74. London, 1903. •Bell, Alexander Graham — Memoirs Upon the Formation of a Deaf "Variety of the Human Race. Washington, D. C, National Academy of Sciences, 1884. 'For a summary see Harris, J. Arthur — Assortative Mating in Man. Popular Science Monthly, LXXX, No. 5, pp. 476-493, New York, May, 1912. "Davenport. C. B. — State Laws Limiting Marriage Selection, p. 14. Eugenics Record Office Bull. No. 9, Cold Springs Harbor, Long Island, N. Y., June, 1913. ''Crum, Frederick S. — The Decadence of the Native American Stock. Quarterly Pub. American Statistical As.sn., XIV, n. s. 107. pp. 215-223, Sept., 1914. "Cited by Weinberg. W. — Methode der Vererbungsforschung beim Menschen. Berliner Klinische Wochenschrift, vol. 49, 1912; No. 14, pp. 646-649 (April 1), and No. 15, pp. 697-701 (April 8). i^'Since the above was written, the Eugenics Record Office has published Bulletin No. 13 on "How to Make a Eugenical Family Study." It gives details of procedure which will be of much value to anyone interested in genealogy from the viewpoint I have outlined, and will be sent gratis. I believe, to any serious Inquirer. MAYFLOWER DESCENDANTS 79 GENEALOGICAL RESEARCH AMONG DES- CENDANTS OF THE MAYFLOWER EMIGRANTS. By HERBERT FOLGER HISTORIAN tSOCIETY OF MAYFLO^'KR DESCENDANTS IN THfi 8TATB OF CALIFORNIA Some seven years ago, in the course of the work performed as Historian of the Society of Mayflower Descendants of Cali- fornia I had a call from an office boy, who asked if I owned a ranch in the State of Washington ; I replied that I had no such ranch. He then produced a record of a policy issued to "H. Folger" and giving a Washington address. The Society made it a practice to address postal cards or circulars to persons whose names implied that they might be descended from the passengers on the good ship "Mayflower." A card was accordingly sent to Mr. H. Folger, and the card asked that the names of his parents and grandparents be for- warded to the Society, together with certain other information. In due time we received a reply that his father was named Jethro and that the family came from North Carolina and had no con- nection with any Mayflower stock ; that there was a tradition in North Carolina, however, that their ancestors had come from Massachusetts. Upon investigation it was found that a Latham Folger had removed from Massachusetts to North Carolina in 1774 and been lost sight of. It was five years before we could determine in general terms where this family had gone and of whom it con- sisted. Finally a young lady was found in North Carolina who proved a good friend. She was connected with Guilford Col- lege, which had in its vaults some of the records of the Society of Quakers of early days. It trans])ired that all the emigrants to North Carolina from Massachusetts at that time were mem- bers of the Society of Quakers, the move having been made to escape the necessity of military service. That society not only recorded the names of children who were born but also made very complete records of the mar- riages. Every certificate began: "Whereas son of desires marriage with daughter of " and often also gave the names of all relatives present together Avith their rela- tionship, rendering the records of the greatest value. We his* torians who are required to prove statements are especially helped when we can refer to a record which clearly traces the parentage of the people affected. It was found that Latham Folger had ten children, one of whom was named Jethro and was born in 1797. This hardly seemed to meet the case, for it did not seem possible that a man 80 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF GENEALOGY writing the hand in which Homer Folger's letter was written could be the son of a man born in 1797. He was communicated with on this point, and stated that in 1855 his father Jethro married a second wife and that he had himself been born in 1862, wdien his father was 65 years of age. This peculiar case drew" the attention of our society to the need of reliable vital records and we have ever since sought by individual correspondence to ascertain and preserve the records of families. We have had some success, but I am convinced that we Americans do not pay sufficient attention to the necessity of following the custom of our ancestors in recording the names of our children not only in town records but also in church and family records. Getting down to the concrete, on the Pacific Coast w^e are three thousand miles from Plymouth. It is found that one-third of the claims filed with the Society have been invalid because incorrect; lines of descent submitted in good faith have many defects. Of the remainder some are quite unable to go back of their grandparents ; old people are excusable for not remem- bering their grandparents' names. If we are disappointed in this way in 1915, what may we expect in the year 2000? Many records now available are sub- ject to loss. It should be possible for a Federation such as this to preserve records, make them accessible, and arouse the in- terest of the community at large in vital records. The fact that the men coming to California brought no records with them, preserved none and kept none, has made the work in California exceptionally difficult, but interest has been aroused to cor- respond with the magnitude of the task. The interest in genealogical work is largely personal; it may be that some of you can enjoy hearing other people recount a line at great length but I confess I get very tired and that a little goes a long way with me. How many fully realize that the chief interest in the subject of Pilgrim genealogy lies in the personality it brings up — in the character of the stock — and lies further in the historical fact that this original stock which landed on the shores of Massachusetts in 1620 very shortly scattered. Many of them are lost to sight and a large part of them are lost in the records. One who says there are a million descendants of the Pilgrims in this nation may be stating a truth literally but he could not possibly prove it. At the end of 21 years the Society of May- flower Descendants has not had more than four thousand mem- bers in the entire nation. I urge upon you when you go to your homes that in the society each attends a record of descent as showing that one comes of good clean stock shall be set dow^n and preserved. I do not think that in the concrete you can do any better work. GENEALOGY AND HUMAN SOCIETY 81 IHE STUDY OF GENEALOGY AND ITS PLACE IN THE AFFAIRS OF HUMAN SOCIETY. By CHARLES G. FINNEY WILCOX OF THK ASSOCIATION OFWIl.(OX FAMILIKS AND AI-LIED FAMIMKS. Genealogy touches life in its most vital and important relations. In the Mytliology of tlie Ancients there were the Parcae, or Fates, who were conceived as holding the destinies of all mankind in their hands. They were known as Clotho, Lachesis and Atropos. The significance of the allusion to them in this place will be obvioiis upon a further investigation of their offices or the sphere of their dominion over humanity. An ancient verse best defines their character and their offices: Clotho colum retinet, Lachesis net, Et Atropos occat. This translated means: "Clotho upliolds the column or distaff, Lachesis spins or weaves, and Atropos cuts the thread." When appearing together they were generally represented as three women with chaplets made of white wool and interwoven with flowers of the narcissus. They were covered with a white robe and fillet of the same color bound with chaplets. By reason of their office their power was great and extensive: Clotho, the youngest, presiding over birth and generation, or the origin of life; Lachesis, the second, presiding over the future and the fortunes and success of life; and Atropos, the oldest, decreeing the end of life and cutting it off in accordance with her arbi- trary Mill. These goddesses were supposed to be subject to none of tlie gods but Jupiter, while some supposed that even Jupiter himself was subject to them and obedient to their commands. They were generally regarded as the arbiters of life and death of mankind and it was supposed that whatever of good or evil niight befall persons in the world proceeded from them. Thus the Fates or Parcae controlled the life, fortune and death, or the supreme destinies of mankind; so genealogy records the same events in the lives of mankind. As the Parcae occupied a place of supreme power so genealogy occupies a similar place of supreme importance, as it is no less than the history of the omnipotent decrees and ensuing deeds and enactments of these 82 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF GENEALOGY omnipotent deities in their administration of the affairs of the human race over which they bear rule. We cannot overestimate the importance of the study of geneal- ogy; as we have said, it touches life in its most momentous relations in conjunction with history; it is to be gleaned from an infinite variety of sources; at every turn we are confronted with sources of information and evidences of genealogical facts; public records, directories, registers of churches, monuments and tombstones. I would suggest as a clew not often resorted to, the subscription lists of journals and periodicals, and even the books of account of business firms may contain names of certain persons otherwise un- obtainable. The relation of a family to certain persons is often suggested or evidenced by the naming of children; the political affiliations and sympathies, or the particular beliefs of a person or family are also thus often shown in that the child is named for a person prominent at the time, or one Avho is revered and honored by the family in which the child is born. The knowledge of one's genealogy is a guide to matrimonial selection, by observation of results and the laws of heredity as well as they may be understood and applied. It has been considered as an aid to the elimination of unfit persons from society, but is not suiificiently certain to justify the enactment of radical measures that will interrupt the established course of governmental affairs as adapted to the fundamental principles of law and government. It discloses family tendencies; the effect on progeny of large families may be noted by knowledge of these things ; there have been observations relative to the probable success of the youngest or oldest of a family, or their attaining to eminence; also the trans- mission of family traits in older and younger children, the males or the females, and the inheritance of the males or females from the father or mother. Genealogy and the study of the subject tends to accuracy and order; it encourages the preservation of records, of relics, heir- looms and monuments; it is an inspiration to higher ideals and attainments of life; the study of the lives of our ancestors; it is an incentive to the establishment of a truer and greater justice, a larger liberty, a broader toleration, more tender compassion, a truer democracy, a more steadfast hope, a stronger faith in God, in man, in one's self. It reveals the origin of a person and the effect of environment and heredity upon his status and estate in society; the connections of a man by marriage, his parentage or ancestry, and the effect thereof upon his own life. All should realize the importance of knoAvledge of these essent- ial facts that they may more efficaciously protect themselves in their rights and enjoy larger privileges, based thereon and arising there- from. GENEALOGY AND HUMAN SOCIETY 85 t To what shall we liken genealogy? It is the log-book of the voyage of our ancestors adown the endless river of time — across the shoreless sea of life; from it we should chart our own course across the great ocean of futurity. We should make our own genealogy an aid to ourselves, our families, and our friends, and should by a knowledge of that of others fortify and defend ourselves against our enemies. The sphere of genealogy and the knowledge gained by study of the subject is not and should not be involved with legislation or government in our country. It has often been involved with the government of other nations and has too often under these circum- stances proven a bane or a curse to the people of such nation and the world. By applying the knowledge of the principles acquired by the study of genealogy to our own lives as individuals and families we may be benefited, and be the arbiters of our own lives and conduct, but by seeking to apply these principles through the agency of civil government and legislation we place ourselves in danger, because we thereby give into the hands of others the absolute control of our own destinies. Each of us today can truly say: "I am the sum of my ancestors; my world is the world in which my ancestors lived ; and the shrines of my devotion are the homes and citadels of their nativity; and the monuments that mark their graves are to me as precious stones set in the treasure box of life." By a knowledge of genealogy we acquire pride of birth ; we find in it an inspiration to live a noble life, to be worthy of the honored name we bear. It conduces to study and liberal education; the study of hygiene and the development of physical strength and beauty, the preservation of health and an incentive to a life of sobriety; it inculcates a spirit of veneration and develops the religious instinct in our nature; it is an incentive to thrift and industry, and is, therefore, the basis and foundation of prosperity, stability and wealth; it broadens and enlarges life in all its rela- tions, and especially promotes domestic felicity and joy, harmony and content. It conduces to right living, pleasant social relations, a delightful courtship, and a pure, wholesome marriage ; an honorable and a happy life ; a resigned and peaceful death ; a loved and cher- ished memory in the hearts of friends and kindred ; a progeny on the earth to fulfill and realize our hopes and aspirations and to guar- antee unto us a realization of our cherished dream of an existence in a future and a happier state ; the joys of love, honor and domestic felicity in a world made bright and beautiful with flowers and gems while living ; honor and veneration, tears and lamentations, sculp- tured monuments and storied urns, garlands, and funeral wreaths when silent in death, and though silent yet still existent, active and living our own high ideals with a conscious realization and a per- sonal delight in the lives of a devoted posterity, who are in their 84 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF GENEALOGY turn raised to a more exalted plane of life as a result of our own lives and of the devotion and venerable regard we have exemplified for our ancestors and the preservation of the knowledge of all that appertains to them. This indeed and in truth, is the sphere of genealogy in the affairs of human society. He who plants his feet upon the vantage ground of genealogy has surelj^ ascended the Holy Mount (even as iMoses, the great Law Giver), from which may be seen the glories of the Promised Land, where those who follow after us will enjoy the bliss of life in a land of fertile valleys, wooded and watered mountains, orchards and fruitful vineyards; a land that floweth with milk and honey. Genealogy reveals the kinship of man to man and nation to nation; it exemplifies and proves the Divine Word, that "God hath made of one flesh all nations tliat dwell in the earth." "And ah ! it is a noble deed to show before mankind ; How every race and every creed may be in love conjoined ; May be conjoined, yet not forget. The fountains whence they rose, As filled with many a rivulet, The stately Shannon flows." It is the history of families in epochs and chapters. It is the stratification of history, a chart of the evolution of our own race and generation, disclosing the difference between families. Genealogy discloses one's relatives and ena1)les one to benefit as far as possible by the sacred ties of consanguinity. It gives one a knowledge of the qualities of temperament, character and genius in himself and others. If all men are related to one another, we may by a knowledge of genealogy become acquainted Avith our near- est relatives. Genealogy in a monarchy or autocratic government is the cement that binds together the stones in the edifice of state ; genealogy in a democracy is the safeguard against revolution and the re-estab- lishment of a despotism, for by a knowledge of genealogy the people may be able to prevent descendants of their hereditary enemies, the scions of ancient kings and emperors, from establish- ing themselves in power. Genealogy as a study is an inspiration and an aid to humanity in all fields of endeavor and activity; as a science it is but specu- lative, conjectural and uncertain. It does not afford a sufficient basis for positive conclusions as to what man will be, although it is a light to the understanding in determining what men are. It is the instrument of the despot, the conqueror, and the foeman of mankind, when used for the subjugation and extermination of a race, a nation, or a noble family. GENEAI.OGY AND HU.MAX SOCIETY 85 It is relied upon as ii means of arousing prejudice as well as for fostering friendship; of inspiring fear as well as for winning favor. It is used by ambitious and unjust rulers as a means of overthrowing families and nations l)ecause of their relation to one certain individual who luis incurred general disfavor or hatred. The work of conquest by a tyrant may be more expeditious and complete if by a false theor}^ of heredity he can induce his followers or subjects to destroy a nation, a class of persons or a family, when they would otherwise, and in justice, destroy only the individual who might be guilty of the offense. Persons interested in eugenics, and elimination by sterilization, segregation and extermination, should consider the dangers to all mankind of making it possi!)le for unjust men in political office and temporary power to work an irreparable injury upon others who might have incurred their hatred, malice and disfavor. Where is genealogy found? Among what genus, race, order of beings? What is its office? Do we find the accurate and precise pedigree from the founding of the world among the slimy reptiles crawling among the rocks of the wilderness? The savage beasts of the forest that l)ite and devour one another, making the welkin hide- ous by day and by night with their roaring and shrieks? Or even among human kind do we find the naked savage, clad in the breech cloth and anidets and anklets absorbed in the study of his lineage and coat armor? And yet again do we find among the oppressed serfs and slaves of semi-civilized nations or even among the peasantry, an intense interest in the annals of their noble sires? No. It is not among the savage tribes, not among .serfs and slaves, not among the peasantry and yeomanry that we find the rare exotic that blooms only in the palace of the king. It is not among these that we find the carefully preserved pedigree with the arms and crests of noble sires, M'ith hatchments, escutcheons and marks of eadency, but only among the noble families who have stood above tlieir kind through the lapse of passing centuries: "As some proiul cliff that lifts its awful form. Swells from tlie val(> and nobly cleaves the storm; Though round its breast the rolling clouds are spread; Eternal sunshine centei's on its head." It is pertinent here to inquire why we are interested in gene- alogy? Why should we be interested in this subject. We as Americans — democratic citizens of a democratic nation — a nation whose foundation and cornerstone is the preamble of the Declara- tion of Independence which declares: ''All men are created equal, and endowed hy their Creator with certain inalienable rights, which among other.^ are life, lihertjjrand the pursuit of happiness." Can true Americans boast an interest in that which concerns kings and princes, and the scions of royalty? Or do we resign our title 86 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF GENEAL0G1 of Americans when we find in tracing our ancestral pedigrees that we derive our origin from the kings and emperors of the Eastern Hemisphere ? This might at first appear to be the consistent deduction from the previous statement, that genealogy in its completeness is most often found among the royal families, but it is not a true and logical conclusion, as we shall clearly show. But to properly answer the question: "Can we as true Americans be interested in gene- alogy in view of the assertion that the subject so largely concerns nobility?" we must revert to some essential facts of history and trace the circumstances and events that resulted in the colonization of this, the Western Hemisphere, and the founding of the govern- ment under which we live, the government of the United States of America. Before the Colonization, Development, Federation and Kevolu- tion had been consummated in this country, for almost three cen- turies the nations of Europe had been ravaged by civil war and fratricidal strife. The issues were the issues of Life, Liberty and Justice, as against Arbitrary Power and Despotism ; the opposing parties and armies were composed of persons of rank and nobility, sometimes of factions of the same family, and sometimes of different families opposed to one another from time immemorial ; but they were in most cases commanded and championed by men of royal blood, upon which side soever they were aligned. Ultimately, the more powerful forces were successful, and the conquered at this, the Col- onial period, sought asylum in America ; a very wise course, since to be identified with a party known to be opposed to the Crown in a Monarchical Government is more serious than to be opposed to the predominating party in a Republican Government such as our own. In this way we can understand how it happened that many families of noble blood settled in America as colonists, but owing to political issues made no effort to herald the facts to the world and eventually sunk into the oblivion of obscure life, and forgotten graves. As Americans then, although we do not seek to establish rights to title, estates or hereditary offices, we may knoAv that we are equal in rank if rank is honorable, to the noblest scion of the royalty of Europe. It is not for the glamor and pride of royalty alone that we, as Americans, are interested in genealogy, although we often find with royalty the highest perfection of genealogy — charts, family trees, diagrams, arms, crests, hatchments, cadency, and all that is associated with the genealogical science. "For what is pomp, rule, reign^ But earth and dust?" GENEALOGY AND HUMAN SOCIETY 87 "The boast of heraldry, the pomp of power, And all that beauty, all that wealth ere gave, Await alike the inevitable hour. The paths of glory lead but to the grave." Aye — and in the co\irse of time and events we oft see the exemplification of the proverb : "He hath put down the mighty from their seat; He hath exalted them of low degree." "Pride bend thine eye from heaven to thine estate, See how the mighty sink into a song — Can volume, pillar, pile, preserve the great? Or must thou trust tradition's tongue, When flattery sleeps with thee. And historv does thee wrong?" I The kaleidoscopic changes in the fortunes of the world continu- ally and unceasingly bring before the eye of the observer of men and affairs the changing glories of the scene. As the kaleidoscope revolves, the position of the variously colored prisms is shifted and new combinations of form and color are presented to the eye in infinite variety ; the red and the blue, the yellow and the purple, the orange and green, the black and the white, the neutral tints all commingling and reflected, always changing, never twice the same. But in the never ceasing change the black and the white, the neutral tints and the grays, the red and the blue, the yellow and the purple, the orange and green, never lose their value, but remain ever the same ; ever producing upon the retina the same impression and effect, only by juxtaposition, position and reflection and chang- ing light and multiplication is the change in effect produced. Our lives, individually and collectively, are one vast kaleidoscope in which we are each but as one of the brilliant prisms jostling and piling one upon another, ever assuming new positions reflecting the light of new surroundings, but ever the same identical prisms, or units. In the great kaleidoscope of human life as the world revolves we can behold the coalition of individuals, the serf, the slave, the savage, the barbarian, the peasant and the yeoman, the general and the statesman, the prince and the king, priest and bishop, cardinal and pontiff, each in the sphere of their changing environ- ment and surroundings, but ever the character of each remains the same. Now one, now another appears in ascendency, in all the blazing glory of royalty and power, clothed in regal majesty-— vassals waiting at their command and princes bowing before their decrees; but regardless of position or transient power each retains and displays to the world his true character of prince or plebeian, 88 INTERNATIOxMAL CONGRESS OF GENEALOGY emperor or slave, king or peasant; the God-man in the sovereign majesty of noble character, or the degraded being in the unclean garments of vice and crime, upon the royal throne or -whatever may be the apparent station he holds in the world of men. In the songs of Kabir, by Raniandranath Tagore, he has said: "When the wave rises it is the water, and when it falls it is the same water. Because it has been named a wave, shall it no longer be water?" Of many a noble family of former days it might be truly said : "Bright star of the morning that beamed on the brow, Of the chief of ten thousand, oh where are thou now? The sword of your fathers is cankered with rust, And the might of thy clan is bowed low in the dust." Of the noble family of Roslyn we read: "Seemed all on fire that chappelle proud, Where Roslyn 's chiefs uncoffined lie. Each baron for a sable shroud Shelled in his iron panoply. "Blazed battlements and pennants bright, Blazed every rose-carved buttress fair, So shall they blaze when falls in might. The leading line of high St. Clare. "There twenty of Rosh'n's barons bold Lie buried within that proud cliappelle. Each one the holy vault doth hold. But the sea holds lovely Rosabelle. " " 'Twere long to tell, and srid to trace, Each step from splendor to disgrace." In the foregoing we have sufficiently emphasized and illustrated the fact that station does not confer character nor wealth station ; that station is not enduring, and that neither royal title, station, wealth nor character can be successively and indeterminately trans- mitted with certainty from generation to generation ; but we believe it to be indisputable that character above all — wealth, station, royalty, power, aye, character of all things, is the most enduring, potential and fruitful in largess of reward to those who possess it — "Above all things, Truth beareth away the victory." The question may arise : If the most prized and most valuable things of life are not transmissible with certainty from one genera- tion to another, why should we devote our time and attention to the laborious task of tracing and preserving our lineage from re- GENEALOGY AND HU.MAX SOCIETY 89 mote and forgotten anoestors? Arc we not chasing moonbeams, and the "will-o'-tho-wisp" in the Everglades? No, emi)hatically no — "You perceive the wind and hear its murmuring music, but whence it has come and whither it may wan- der you may never know." Yet will you disregard the wnnd at times and thereby sacrifice yourselves to it by disdaining to take due precaution for protection against its power. Intelligent beings observe, study and record the actions of the winds and all natural forces of nature that they may be prepared to avert dangers or disaster and benefit by a knowledge of the salutory and beneficent effects of such physical conditions as may obtain ; and in like manner shovdd we observe and record all incidents and facts that may reflect light upon the origin, nature, derivation and character of men, that we may know their nature and their destinies as far as may be possible by having an adequate knowledge of their ancestry and origin. The development of our race has been gradual — the advance- ment of learning and science, religion and art has been slow and laborious : "Science moves by slowest stages, Creeping on from point to point. Heaven is not reached by a single bound, But we build the ladder by which we rise, From the lowly earth to the vaulted skies. And we mount to its summit round by round." Although the science of life is incomplete and imperfect we must endeavor to perfect and apply it. The procreation of our species is the grcnitest, the most absorbiug responsibility devolving upon human beings, and although the laws of procreation or repro- duction are but inadequately and vaguely understood by the human family, as we continue to live and reproduce our species we should eontinue to study and learn these laws by improving every oppor- tunity for observation and investigation relative to the principles of this fundamental though abtruse science of the creation of the future race. Thus we see that by genealogical research we nuiy learn the laws of reprodu(qion. not only with respect to the reprodiu-tion of physical beings, but with respect to mentality and moral tendencies, and various phases of character. If by our devotion to this absorb- ing study we can establish definitely, and conclusively demonstrate some certain principles of the law of life not before enunciated or understood by human beings, we will have raised the race one step higher toward the celestial realm — the perfect life and environment to which optimists, religionists and propliets have looked and for which they have hoped in all ages. 90 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF GENEALOGY The influence and efforts of governmental enactments are so far reaching that we should not venture upon new and novel ex- periments, but should stand firm upon the time-tried and tested principles of law, justice and truth that have endured through the passing centuries. To make our state and nation what it should be we must be wise, deliberative and true. We must realize what is the nature of a nation and a state. Alceus to Mytelene. What constitutes a state? Not high raised battlements or labored mound, The thick walled moated gate. Not altars proud with spires or turret crowned, Not bays and broad armed ports. Where laughing at the storms rich navies ride, Not starred and spangled courts. Where low-browed coarseness wafts perfume and pride, No — men! high-minded men With powers as far above dull brute endued In forest, brake or den, As birds excel cold rocks and brambles rude, Men who their duties know But knowing their rights, and knowing dare maintain, Prevent the long-armed blow. And crush the tyrant while they rend the chain, These constitute the state. ^ THE HOUSE RESTORED 91 THE HOUSE RESTORED. By MARIAN LONGFELLOMT OF THK S!iOCIBlV OK THE DK>*«1;NDANT>» OK Rt>HKHT BAHTI.KTT, K»Q., OF PI-YMOUTH, MA>!iHA<:HL'!SETTW. This is, happily, the age of the "builder" and not the "icono- clast," in spite of the great havoc waging in Europe. I have faith to believe that, like the phoenix of old, there will arise from the dust and ashes of evil passions, relentless hate and iconoclastic struggle the era of a brighter day for the family of mankind. There is, I believe, no nobler pursuit, no higher object than the building up of the beauties of character and high purpose as evinced in the lives of those who have preceded us. Indeed, it is a sacred trust committed to our hands that there be no jot or tittle of their good work allowed to perish from among us. The lot of the genealogist is not a happy one, which sentiment, although first voiced under a jest in comic opera in dealing with another walk of life, is true. I would liken the work to that of the toiler who seeks laboriously to rescue from the dust heap of oblivion and disregard the jewel of high purpose and the deed of renown. Of a truth the labor is heavy; much is investigated and ofttimes little is obtained in genealogical research, but the purpose is a noble one and must eventually find its reward. For every nugget of gold discovered there must be tons of rubbish to explore ; still the knowledge that the nugget is there to be found inspires and upholds the seeker. We are the guardians of the past; upon us rests a sacred duty, and in the performance of it there should be, as I have said, suffi- cient reward. If the genealogist be watchful, earetaking and conscientious, though this harvest be small, his or her work is of inestimable value. But what is to be said of the slipshod worker in the ranks of genealogical research? The investigator who stops just short of the goal desired? The seeker who is satisfied with the plausible explanation of a problem? There is nothing so to be feared and so common, alas, as the superficial laborer in the vineyard. There have been more mistakes made, more havoc wrought by such than in any other pursuit. The opinionated person is to be dreaded, but that very trait leads often, through its very intensity of purpose, to the solving of the problem, while the superficial seeker never attains the object sought and frequently is guilty of "false witness" in placing on record some erroneous statement which, like the tare among the wheat, spreads and strangles and finally nullifies all the good heretofore accomplished. 92 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF GENEALOGY For this reason, that there is so much superfieial work done, so much that lacks the seal of complete reliance and the endorsement of the learned, I would urge upon you, members of this Interna- tional Congress of Genealogy now convened, to endorse most strongly the plan of "an uniform publication of the historical and vital records of various counties and states now unpublished, and the establishment of a National Bureau of Vital Records as a part of governmental records at Washington, similar to the records in the General Register Office, Somerset House, London, England. ' ' The history of Great Britain is long and brilliant ; the knowl- edge of the great importance of preserving the records of its history has ever had a firm hold upon that nation. We are the children of that blood, many of us having in our veins no other mixture. Its high renown is ours; its sons were worthy of the scions from whom they came. Why do we, then, continue to let the "house beautiful" remain in a state of dilapi- dation? The same is to be said of those having in their veins the blood of the Huguenot and the Hollandais. We are proud of that, does it not follow that we owe a duty to our forebears and, owing that duty, does it not become us to perform it? In the economy of life there is a large factor which may be briefly listed under the head of "The Family." We know the exact value of the "family" as it affects our own individual case — the relationship of father, mother, sister, brother, husband, wife and children; but that is family in a restricted sense. Do we keep in mind the relative value of the "family" as applied to our ancestral lines? Do we see and recognize the traits, the habits, the virtues, and, alas! the vices that accrue to us through a long line of forbears? Do we justly value the good that has come to us thereby, and wisely guard against the evil that also comes into that great scheme of life? A man lives — or a woman — for his or her family. They die for a principle or an inherited obligation. If, then, the unit of the family calls forth such devotion, must not the idea of the tie of a common stock have great w^eight? It is well, and just, and proper to do all for and in the individual family life, but should all interest cease there? What higher incentive to pure living and noble deeds than the remembrance that one has sprung from a line which has made its mark in history, has written its name on the pages of humanity I The Chinese have their form of "ancestor-worship," and it has been the fashion to deride such; but the ancestor- worship that bids us remember the chivalrous deeds, the noble thoughts that were the soul of those from whom we have descended is a high and praiseworthy object. Again the individual family, in many cases, tends to selfishness : the horizon is too circumscribed, the outlook is too narrow, and the THE HOUSE REST0RP:D 93 wtiU known aphorism "charity begins at home" is f>t'ten so insist- ently urged that it is likely to remain at home aJid there end ! If we will but enlarge our interests; if we will but turn a kindly thought to some other branch of the family tree; if we will but believe that among the larger army of ''collateral branches" we may find interests, enthusiasms, incentives to higher and broader action, then will we find the "family," like the newer and loftier progressive shell of the chambered nautilus, grow more beautiful and appealing, and as a consequence will make our lives more useful in the world. Family lines lend a most fascinating and interesting aspect of life. We may lack some quality of mind or body that apparently should be ours by virtue of bij-th, and lo ! we find it in some son or daughter of a "collateral line," who has sprung from our common ancestor. We may, in turn, possess some attribute or SK IN>iTI'r\T OK t Ol'KNII AOKN. nKN.MARK. I remember from the days of my childhood in a country par- sonage by the coast of the North St-a a song which our maid used to be fond of and which she sang with great pathos. These were the first lines : "Oh Susanna! Wilt thou come and marry me? Then off I'll be to California and gold I will find for thee." According to my idea the number of Danes can hardly be so few who, when the gold fever was raging, could have undertaken the voyage across the Atlantic to seek their fortunes in the Far West. Of course Denmark is not covered everywhere v.ith green beech trees and waving cornfields. Right through Jutland there ex- tends a waste expanse of heather, and along the coast of the North Sea the soil for miles is mingled with drifting sand, which has produced horny hands and tough sinews before crops could be thought of at all. Such rough, uncouth surroundings would natur- ally tend to enhance the emigration with a prospect of amelioration of wages and social conditions, but America was not deceived by these sturdy and industrious people, and we who remained at home have often had the opportunity to be pleased at the praise which was bestowed upon our compatriots in the new country of their adoption. From time to time "The Danish Genealogical Institute" re- ceives an old certificate of character or a faded document from across the sea with the request to obtain information about their kinsmen at home. Hitherto the number of such requests has not been very large, but that, I should take it, is due to the fact that the struggle for existence has provided our pioneers with quite enough to do. A couple of generations must go by before our friends can afford the time to think of anything but material things in life and before their traditions and family histories begin to form. However, the time will surely come when many of the descendants of the emigrants will seek for information regarding their ancestors in Denmark, and it has, therefore, afforded me great pleasure to have received "California Genealogical Society's" flattering invitation to relate a little as to how the genealogical researches are carried out in this country. 96 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF GENEALOGY It may here be stated at once that Denmark is one of those countries where the sources are plentiful and easily accessible to the student of genealogy. Whilst still in many places abroad — to the great detriment of genealogical research — the materials in con- nection with archives are found distributed among various officials wliere they are likely to be exposed to defacement and danger from fire, we can thank Mr, A. D. Jorgensen from South Jutland for two main sources from which one can draw if one is in search of information about one's ancestors: in church registers and in the records of settlements of estate in Denmark, these being concen- trated in three national archives (one for Jutland, one for Funen, and one for Sealand with Lolland-Falster and Bornholm) where they are at the free disposal of the public. In order to be able to utilize these archives to their fullest advantage it is only necessary that one has some practice in de- ciphering scripts. It is here we take the lead as compared with foreign countries, for even where the church registers (the records of settlements of estates are certainly a special northern phenom- enon, as I have never in any single case met with anything similar abroad) are concentrated as, for example, in Scotland, Meck- lenburg and many other places a certain fee is charged for the use of same. In addition to these main sources, the church registers, in which are to be found the records of our ancestors' christenings, marriages and deaths, and to the registers of estates, which contain information of their bequests and heirs, there are, of course, many other sources to fall back upon, e. g., census and census lists (in the last mentioned the places of birth have been given since 1844), trade licenses, also usually indicating place of birth (in olden times, however, often only mentioning the country or that part of the country to which the person in question belonged), registers of legal decisions, letters patent and concessions, together wtih statu- tory records. If one is fortunate enough to be descended from a fighting and quarrelsome ancestor the latter are of great value if the church and estate registers are discrepant. The church registers were put into force by law in Denmark in the years 1645-46. Only a few, however, go so far back ; partly the rules were not adhered to everywhere and partly some of the registers were the victims of unfortunate circumstances. It was only after 1814, when duplicates were introduced, that one could depend upon the existence of church registers from all parishes. When it is known in which parish an ancestor has been resident this register will not be found so difficult to consult; but it is to be hoped that the same forefather was possessed of a cairn and equable temperament, one who had remained on the spot which he at one time had chosen, for otherwise it will be difficult enough to follow him from one locality to another. GENEALOGICAL RESEARCH L\' DENiMARK 97 The examination of estate registers is less easy, the estate de- partments in former times having been controlled by various authorities. ^lilitary and ecclesiastical each had their own estate department and the town theirs; in the country the lauded pro- prietors belong to the eount.v sheriffs' jurisdiction and the large majority of peasants, the leaseholders, may cause especial difficul- ties, as each landed proprietor settled his peasants' estates himself. As an estate might possess peasant-owned property in various parts of the country, it is not always easy to find where such an estate can be located. I have in the foregoing made brief mention of some of the chief sources of information which have not found their way into print, and I will now draw attention to a few of the many printed records which a Danish genealogist has at his disposal. As in most other countries, Denmark has its biographical dic- tionaries (also including Norway from 1537 to 1814) in which all personages who have distinguished themselves by deeds, either good or evil, are enumerated. There are besides this a few older works on the Danish nobility — a splendid material in a long row of stately volumes of "Denmark's Nobility Annual" — which have been published yearly since 1884. Among other lists of pedigrees may be mentioned "Gjessings Jubellarere" (biographies and pedi- grees of Danes, Norwegians and Icelanders who have celebrated their fifty years' jubilee of office); "Lengnicks," numerous but rather unreliable genealogies of noble and plebeian families (the later preponderating) ; "Patrician Families" and "Family Hand- book" (supplement to "Genealogical Review"). As regards works of reference dealing with individual persons we have in Denmark a fairly good number of reliable works deal- ing with almost every profession, such as the clergy, teachers, doctors, lawyers, military persons, authors, artists, politicians, etc., who have all had their biographers, so that it is comparatively easy to trace a man who would not be included among the peasant or citizen classes. Nothing similar could be thought of in large countries where it would be a stupendous task for one single man, for instance, to collect material for a complete handbook on the clergy of the country during a period of about 350 years, as has been done in Denmark. Also in the method of working I believe the Danish genealogist (I can well include the Norwegian and partly the Swedish) are ahead of most other countries. Principally, Keeper of Archives Thiset's work on the history of the Danish nobility, and many excellent treatises on the review of personal biograpliists which have appeared since the year 1880, have helped to direct the genealogical research in this country and in Norway into scientific channels, and what has been produced in works dealing with gene- alogical and personal biographies is, in my opinion, better than anywhere else, both as regards quality and quantity. Here will 98 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF GENEALOGY also be found a long and attractive list of family bocks and an- cestral tables. Even if genealogical research in a general way is not a particularly involved thing, it is still necessary to execute a thorough and correct work, and as an intimate knowledge and undertaking of the many printed and unprinted sources of infor- mation can only be obtained by many years experience, it is, therefore, always an advantage to apply to a reliable expert instead of meddling in the business oneself. Both money and time will be thereby saved and often information obtained which otherwise one would have to go without. What we especially need in Denmark, from a genealogical point of view, is a more intensive connection with foreign countries. Nearly every family spreads its branches over foreign countries; genealogy is, therefore, in a high degree international, but it is cultivated as almost only national here at home. If a family has migrated abroad we obtain, as a rule, little information of their ancestors and easily lose track of the emigrants and their descend- ants. A closer co-operation between the students of genealogy will surely be to the advantage of genealogical research in Denmark. LETTER FROM SIAM 99 LETTER FROM SIAM. V. FRANKFURTER VA.JIRANANA NATIONAL LIBRARY, UANOKOK, SSIAM. Sir : — I feel ereatly honored by your proposal conveyed to me in your letter of the 27th of April last to contribute to the Congress of Genealogy, to be held in San Francisco on July 26th, a paper to be read before the Congress and preserved in its proceedings upon the genealogy of the Siamese people. It would have given me pleasure to contribute such a paper to your proceedings, but your letter reached me too late to make it possible for me to comply with your wish. I will only remark that the proper designation of the Siamese is ''Thm," that coming from the borders of China — as can be proved by legend and language — they extended their dominion through the valley of the "Menam Chao Phraya" and "Me nam Kong'' down to the ]\Ialay Peninsula, with Ligor as the capital, and as far south as Malacca. With regard to the question of a pedigree of a well known Siamese family, I have to point out that a hereditary nobility does not exist in Siam. The nobility, if so it can be called, is an official one. Up to two years ago family names, as such, did not exist among the Siamese; they have been created by the present king and it is said will come into general use in two years' time. I regret that owing to the bad communications at present exist- ing and the shortness of time, I cannot give you fuller information, but hold myself at your disposal for anything further you may wish or I may supply. I have the honor to be Your very obedient servant, (Signed) V. Frankfurter. To the Hon. Henry Byron Phillips, President California Genealogical Society, San Francisco, U. S. A. 100 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF GENEALOGY PRESIDENT'S COMMEMORATIVE ADDRESS.' By franh hervey pi:ttingell PRESIDENT INTERN ATION^M. CONCRESS OF GENEALOGY We are assembled here this afternoon to participate in the closing exercises of the International Congress of Genealogy which has been in session for three days in San Francisco. The Panama-Pacific International Exposition has recognized the Congress by giving it a place on the official program. This recognition is highly prized and will go far toward impressing this Congress on the memory of every one present. Our business is finished; we now want to see the wonders of this Exposition, I will not attempt any pyrotechnic flight of oratory ; no doubt all the adjectives in the English language have long ago been exhausted in its praise. When we disperse today and you will go your different ways, I hope you will spread the importance of American Genealogy; not only as it relates to the past but as to its bearing on the future. I take great pleasure in introducing Mr. Colvin B. Brown of the Panama-Pacific International Exposition who has a most pleasant task to perform, ♦Delivered at the opeDlng of the Commemorative Session, July 31, 1915. ADDRESS OP WELCOME 101 ADDRESS OF WELCOME. By COLVIN B. BROW^N OF THE BOARD OF DIRKCTORS, PANAMA-PACIFIC INTERNATIONAI> EXPOSITION. It is my pleasant privilege today to extend to you a word of greeting on behalf of the President and Board of Directors of the Fanama-Pacifie International Exposition and to present to you a token of their appreciation at having you with us today as our very welcome guests. The builders of the Exposition set for themselves a heavy task when they undertook to create something that would adequately celebrate the completion of the Panama Canal. They well under- stood that in order to meet expectations it would have to be some- thing more beautiful, more compelling, and grander in every way than any that had gone before. So the men who undertook this task gathered to them architects of international fame, the nation's greatest colorist, the world's most famous expert on lighting, and a landscape gardener who had turned the sand dunes at the Golden Gate into a modern Paradise. And these people and their helpers took the perfect architecture of Greece, mingled it with the art of Spain's renais- sance, spilled upon it the color of the Orient, lighted it like an opal and set it in the midst of a garden of flowers and shrubs and far- reaching lawns. In the meantime emissaries were sent throughout the world who gathered together exhibits representing the very sum of human achievements in all that makes for the comfort, the happiness, and the benefit of mankind. So here we have this marvelous combination of architecture, color and light, these palaces filled with the best that man has wrought, and today it is all at your disposal. We bid you a sincere welcome to it and express to you our earnest wish that all good possible may flow to you from contact with, and understanding of, the feast that has been prepared for you. There is something more here than the physical evidences that you will see around you, for those who built the Exposition were idealists, and they thought this creation of theirs would scarcely be worth the effort if the Exposition were to die with the destruction of the buildings. It was their intent that out of all the time and money and effort something lasting must result if the real mission of the Exposition were to be fulfilled. And so national and inter- national congresses, conventions and societies were invited to hold their meetings here. Eight liundred nnd tliirty-five accepted the invitation, and these, meeting in these surroundings, studying the 102 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF GENEALOGY lessons the exhibits teach and consulting together for the benefit of that which they represent, are bound to evolve something which, in the aggregate, will redound to the benefit of all humanity for all time. The members of the International Genealogical Congress repre- sent a forward movement in race betterment. You recognize that you have inherited an obligation from your ancestors that you must fulfill to the best that is in you, and that you must pass this down to those who follow after you, to the end that each succeeding generation, if true to its obligation, will approach nearer and nearer to the goal of perfect man and womanhood. So I feel that you represent in the highest way the very spirit of this great Exposition, and it is an honor to welcome you. I have here our words of welcome inscribed on imperishable bronze. May the work you are doing for the uplift of the race last as long as this endures. Intrinsically it is of small value, but the spirit in which it is given is great. ACCEPTANCE OF CO.MMEMORATIVE MEDAL lOS RESPONSE AND ACCEPTANCE OF COM- MEMORATIVE MEDAL. By HENRY BYRON PHILLIPS PRKSIDKNT C-AI-II''ORNIA. litCNKALOOICAL SOCIETY. Mr. Colvin B. Brown, representing Mr. Chas. C. Moore, Presi- dent of the Panama-Pacific Internntion d Exposition: I wish to express the appreciation ol' the members of this Con- gress upon the wonderful showintjf you have made in construction and equipment of this Exposition ; it seems to me that were there nothing whatever to be seen inside of any building in these grounds that the wonderful beauty of the exteriors, the magic settings of flowers and greens, the great transformation of its wonderful even- ing lights and shadows would be of themselves alone worthy of a journey from the uttermost parts of the earth simply to enjoy to the utmost. You have budded better than you knew, and why have you done all these things, that would seem almost impossi})le were it not a glittering truth? "Was it for mere material gain to your city and State? It was not. Was it to (celebrate the opening of the Panama Canal ? Many of you no doubt honestly think so. Was it in a larger way to call attention to the shifting trade currents of the world, and emphasize the Pacific Coast as the coming future empir-^ of the world's commercial and industrial activities? Perhaps many also will assign that as the reason of its being. But it seems to those who have come from afar to see the glories of this Exposition and enjoy the hospitality of its creators that you yourselves do not grasp the real significance and reason why this great thing has been so superbly done. It seems to me, and to others, that it was born of necessity. Psychologists tell us that we have in our mental makeup certain emotional functions that tend to produce actions of special char- acter, technically called by them '% )?n|)lexes, " that when a certain "complex" dominates our mind to the exclusion of other things that we become to an extent insane upon that subject. Now it appears to me that the overwhelming nature of your calamity of a few years sincM* so douunated your 'uinds. that you as a community had an overwhelming "complex" set up in your minds, that if left undisturbed would have driven you to the insanity of despair. But here the radiant beauty of that Equili- brium between Infinite Wisdom and Infinite Power made itself manifest to preserve the balan«'(^ in nature, and your minds in- 104 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF GENEALOGY stinctively and for self-preservation turned to another "complex" to safeguard your mentalities from that greater calamity of despair. This saving "complex" was the thought of this Exposition, little perhaps at first, but eagerly grasped for by your minds as a balance and saviour, growing by leaps and bounds; it would not take no for an answer to anything, it fought the fight of despair to gain the sanction of Congress, subscribed your material fortunes almost joyously, overcame all obstacles, designed and builded in the same compelled mood of mentality, for self-preservation. The purpose of this International Congress of Genealogy is to bring in common touch the representatives of the numerous local kindred organizations that have heretofore been working each in its own way, in a more or less restricted field, to broaden their outlook, to avoid duplication of work and thus loss of energy; to establish uniform system and methods, to memorialize Congress for the needed legislation to preserve the vital records of this country in a manner befitting the necessities and intelligence of our people ; to discourage superficial and inaccurate work; to collect scattered records of the past from places of danger, decay or other hazard and cause them to be conserved in safe repositories; to collect and place at the disposal of all scientific investigation the necessary vital data upon which they must of necessity build in their efforts to conserve and improve the human race, and, finally, to lay the foundation of an International Genealogical Federation, which shall be an organized body, which shall supervise to a large extent the activities indicated above and other cognate matters that may be determined as proper subjects for recognition by the consent of the bodies embraced in the proposed federation. It is confidently expected that the stamp of approval of this federation shall be taken as the final word in such matters. A few arguments may be briefly presented to establish the reasonable and correct understanding of Genealogy. It is eminently useful to the student of history; no one can understand the secret motives or the political manoeuvers of the the statesmen of Europe, for example, not knowing the relation- ships of their leading families. Periods whose history is most complicated, are intelligible only by means of genealogical tables, for family pride, the love of one 's own blood, the reliance upon ties of kindred have ever exercised a powerful influence. The genealogi- cal table sometimes comes in to solve, with gratifying simplicity, these enigmas in political histor}^ which, without this aid, would have been shrouded in complete darkness. If the genealogy of the royal families and of statesmen must be ascertained in order to render intelligible the annals of a nation, so must the relationships of families be made known in order to explain many of the occurrences in the history of towns and the country-side. Thus it may be understood that genealogy is the corner stone of history. ACCEPTANCE OF COMMEMORATIVE MEDAL lOS The preservation of family history, which is more than a mere collection of names for the purpose of forming a pedigree, has come to be regarded as one of the most important parts of the history of a people. Hitherto history was limited almost exclusively to governmental and political affairs; the pomp and glitter of courts, an assumed glory of military achievements, and all the attendant circumstances of oppressive rule. Hardly a glimpse do we get of the real life of the people, the men of the mart, the farm or the factory, or of the women whose social and domestic virtues made possible their orderly lives and gave strength to the nation. Of these history is almost silent, for it has been written under the influence of those in power for the most part. The modern historian is realizing that the history of the people is an important portion of modern history, and several recent volumes have been written in which the life story of the men and women of a period who have been forgotten has been pieced out scrap by scrap from materials gathered by genealogists from many scattered sources, to supplement the statecraft history of the past. No more interesting contributions to literature than these have been given to modern readers. Genealogy is essential to family history, and may be called also the handmaid to history, and the genealogist in his search for family connections should gather every scrap of interest relating to the life of those whose genealogies he is seeking to construct. A family pedigree is valuable, but immensely more so when associated with the lives of its component members, or as may be said, clothed with flesh and blood. No man knows himself so well but that he may learn more by scanning the lives of his progenitors. The faults, the strength, the vices, the weakness or the virtue of the father of a family do not end in himself. Human legislation cannot amend the law that our children's children shall be the better for our virtues and worse for our sins. Where can one find a better guide to correct conduct than in the vital records of his ancestors? This is also a functicm of genealogy, a guide to right living. Further it has been said that "those who care nothing for their ancestors are wanting in respect for themselves." Looking at the subject in a large and lofty way T would say the study of genealogy teaches us to live and so develop the latent forces for good that are within us that we may be able to make our ancestor's famous — the progenitors of illustrious men and women. I am sorry that many of our dt^legates felt impelled to leave for their homes, which accounts for the light attendance here today, but all, whether here or absent, will unite with me to thank the management of the Panama-Pacific International Exposition for the many courtesies extended and for the beautiful token of our visit as embodied in this historic imuss of moulded metal, and on 106 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF GENEALOGY behalf of the International Congress of Genealogy I now am pleased to accept this memento from your hands, and place it in the archives of the Congress (for the International Genealogical Federation, its successor) as its first trophy and as an inspiration to future effort and success. 5 8 2 v-^ UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY Los Angeles This book is DUE on the last date stamped below. 0052 ^^» "n <• '^'' USL OCT ii REG LD IW/ED URL A IV! 7-4 4 OCT 11 1965 ID-V3RU Z 1 1981 PM y. 10 FormL9-10)n-3,'48(A7920)444 iiiPiBiiP ( jTHfcHN REGIONAL LIBRARY [Nil III III III I mil III III! AA 000 710 079 5 • J