IH Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2007 with*funding from IVIicrosoft Corporation http://www.archive.org/details/fragmentarypaperOOhollrich FRAGMENTARY PAPERS BY THE I ATE SIR H. HOLLAND LOXDON : PRINTED BY BrOTTISTVOODK AND CO., NETV-STKEET SQUAKTJ AND PABLIAMENT STUEET FEAGMENTAEY PAPEBS ON SCIENCE AND OTHER SUBJECTS BY THE LATE SIK HENEY HOLLAND, BART. EDITED BY HIS SON REV. FRANCIS J. HOLLAND LONDON LONGMAKS, GREEN, AND CO. 1875 All rights reserved PEEFACE. In his ' Eecollections of Past Life,' my Father writes as follows : — ' There is little probability of my ever publishing again ; but I shall leave behind me a volume of manuscript papers consigned to the care of my sons, to deal wdth as their judgment may suggest.' Eeference is here made to certain short essays upon various subjects, which are enumerated in p. 330 of his ' Eecollections of Past Life.' He describes them as ' the thoughts and speculations of former years ; re- duced into more definite form as regards the subjects, and studiously rendered as concise as possible.' And a little later on he speaks of them a3 written for pos- sible publication : ' The papers thus denoted have furnished a very agreeable as well as salutary occupa- tion for those leisure hours which in later years have been more largely at my disposal. But to bring them together, in shape and fitness for publication, would require a more laborious revision tlian I should pro- bably be able to bestow.' These words were written in 1872, and it would ivio349059 VI TREFACE seem that in 1873 my Father, perceiving in him- self no intellectual decline, made up his mind to bestow upon the papers this ' laborious revision.' For, during my last journey with him in Italy, in the autumn of 1873 — a journey from which he only returned to die two days after his arrival in Brook Street — my Father often spoke of tliis as his in- tention ; and in a manuscript book which he had with him at Eome I find the following entry, which I give here in full, both because it is an excellent comment upon the essays published in this volume, and also because it is the very last of the writings of Sir Henry Holland : Rome: Octobers, 1873. I put the first pen here to a volume which I shall continue at intervals, if health of body and mind be still continued to me. The following is the object proposed : In my desk are numerous papers or essays, chiefly written within the last ten or twelve years. The subjects they treat of are, partly, the discoveries and speculations of modern physical science ; partly, those great problems of human life in its various relations to the world around, which have been touched upon in ail ages of philosophy, but have become better defined in our own day, in effect of those stricter laws of induction which have been imposed upon human thought however directed. In writing these papers I made it a chief object to define as far as possible, for my own instruction, the knowledge actually attained on each subject; the direction and possible attainments of the future; and the limits which in their very nature are impassable by human reason or research. Looking recently over these papers after the lapse of some PREFACE. Vll years, I find that many of them would need to be rewritten to meet the demands of fresh discovery or more exact know- ledge ; while the questions involved in others have been so largely handled in modern controversy, that my treatment of them would have little otlier novelty than perhaps a closer concentration of the argument upon the conclusion sought for. Such method indeed, explicitly followed, has especial value in questions of the kind here alluded to. Strong or crucial proofs are enfeebled by contact with weaker ones, and an argument may be prolonged until it loses all its pith and purport. Judging, then, that the larger part of these papers could not be published in their present shape, and seeing that needful changes could not be incorporated without rewriting the whole, which at the age of eighty-five would have been an impossible task, I have thought it best to summarise in a more abridged form what may seem worth retaining of their contents, with such additions as are suggested by the progress of recent research. Such summary indeed I cannot feel to be an easy one. Discovery has been largely at work of late in every branch of human knowledge, and even these con- nexions and correlations in the physical sciences, now so extensively developed, while concentrating physical pheno- mena, whether of living or lifeless matter, round certain foci, have virtually extended the field of research by bringing into view not only new classes of facts, but also those pro- found laws of force and motion upon which these inter- relations depend. The horizon of our knowledge continually, though unequally, expands — obscure in its boundary on every side, and ultimately defined by limits impassable to human reason. One man by genius or happy accident may press more closely than another towards this horizon ; but the ultimate limit is the same to all, involving those mysteries of Matter, Force, and Creati\ e or Grovernmental Power, to which all other problems are subordinate. VllI PREFACE. Seeing then the magnitude of the subjects touched upon, all that I can venture to draw from the papers I have written must be desultory in character, and very imperfect in its handling of each. All that I can expect to afford is a summary of our actual knowledge on some of these great topics, denoting especially what may be considered truths conclusively proved, as distinguished from what is hypo- thetical or presumptive only. Much, probably more than we care to acknowledge, comes under the latter head . . . Witli this unfinished sentence the pen of my Father was laid down for ever; and- that these closing words are thoroughly characteristic, will be felt by every reader of the Essays here brought together. Sentence after sentence could be quoted from them, as also from his other writings, to show how he understood, and ever earnestly taught, that ' those whose researches and thoughts go deepest are best prepared to en- dorse the words of Laplace, " Notre ignorance est immense," as the expression of a truth underlying all our knowledge.' I feel that no further preface is needed for these Essays. As they were left in the MS., so are they now printed for the first time without any material alteration. To the papers not hitherto published have been added three reviews which Sir Henry contributed to the 'Edinburgh Eeview ' in the years 1864, 1871, and J873. FRANCIS J. HOLLAND. CONTENTS, PAOK PROGIIESS OF HUMAN KNOWLEDGE 1 UNITY OF THE CREATIVE FOWER THROUGHOUT CREATION . . 19 PLURALITY OF WORLDS — ARE OTHER PLANETS INHABITED? . 26 MATTER AND FORCE, IN PHYSICAL PHENOMENA . . . . 32 ON MATTER, FORCE, AND MOTION IN SPACE .... 48 DIVISIBILITY OF MATTER — ATOMIC THEORY 62 THE ELECTRIC ELEMENT 81 MENTAL OPERATIONS IN RELATION TO TIME 94 ASTRONOMY AS A SCIENCE — THE SUN 113 LIFE ON THE EARTH — RELATIONS OF MAN TQ OTHER ANIMALS . 125 ANIMAL INSTINCTS 147 EVIL IN THE WORLD 162 PERFECTIBILITY OF MAN . . 169 INFINITY — ETERNITY — ^THE UNTHINKABLE . . . .190 NATURAL THEOLOGY 195 MATERIALISM AS A QUESTION OF SCIENCE /AND PHILOSOPHY . 206 DIFFERENCES OF RELIGIOUS BELIEF 214 SCEPTICISM AND CREDULITY . . . . . . .219 INSANITY 225 X CONTENTS. FAGB HlSTOliY 229 SUAKESPEARE . . . 238 INFLUENCE OF WORDS AND NAMES 244 SUBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS OF THE EYE 248 MAN AND NATURE . . . . . '. . . 251 LAUGEL'S problems of NATURE AND LIFE . . ' . . . 311 MAURY ON SLEEP AND DREAMS . ' 363 E S SAYS. PROGRESS OF HUMAN KNOWLEDGE. No ONE can have lived to his eightieth year (my pre- sent age) without an occasional revision of the events which have been comprised — compressed one might well say — ^within this time ; and amidst many that are ex- traordinary, none are more so than those which mark the progress of human knowledge, and especially of the physical sciences, during the period in question. When travelHng over continent or ocean under the power of steam — when looking (and I never do so without a certain awe) on those wires and cables which make the electric current the instantaneous messenger of man over the globe — or on the light of the electric lamp, emulating that of the sun — or on the photo- graphic creations of the sun itself — or on the brilhant metals extracted by the chemist from the dullest earths — or on those spectrum hues whi^h have made known various new metals on our own globe, and even dis- closed many of the constituents and physical charac- ters of the sun and stars — when looking at these, and many similar things, showing the new mastery Man Z PROGKESS OF HUMAN KNOWLEDGE. has obtained over Matter and its moving Forces, the thought runs back, ahnost starthngly, to that earlier yet not remote time, when these powers were all hidden from our knowledge as completely as if having no existence in the natural world. In the boyhood of my own life some of them now mightiest in our hands lay dormant and purposeless around us. The period which has disclosed them to our knowledge and senses must ever rank high in human chronology. More than sixty years ago Davy showed me, at the Eoyal Institution, the minute globules of sodium and potassium just obtained from the fixed alkalis. In the same laboratory, the birthplace of so many great dis- coveries, I witnessed his first experiments on the chemical actions of the voltaic current — an era in chemical science. Very few years later I heard Dalton expound for the first time that Atomic Theory, which (whatever the antecedent suggestions) gave the earhest impulse to those researches, of which organic chemistry, present and prospective, is the most wonderful expo- nent. Yet later, in the theatre of the Eoyal Institu- tion, I was one of a small party to whom Faraday showed the spark he had just succeeded in drawing from the magnet ; so feeble then as to require an effort to see it, but the forerunner of those marvellous powers which have since been elicited from the same source. These dates, though belonging to my own life only, tell in some part what this century has done for physical science. In an article of the ' Edinburgh Eeview,* some ten years ago (since repubhshed), I sought to dehneate the progress recently made in this great department of PROGRESS OP HUMAN KNOWLEDGE. 3 human knowledge. Such records from time to time, even if imperfect, have their use in denoting the several stages of advancement marked not only by new facts but also by new methods of enquiry. The latter is the point I would chiefly keep in view in what I am now writing. Laplace has said, and truly, that the methods which have led to discovery are often not less useful to science than the discoveries themselves. And nothing so well deserves note in the attainments of the present age as the various new resources, mental and material, which have been brought to bear on the advancement of human knowledge — of the physical sciences more especially, but even of those en- quiries into invisible things, which have perplexed men from one age to another. The stricter demand for proof, as applied to the material world, has borne some fruit even in this obscure region of speculative thought. What I am about to write on this subject will have little novelty for scientific men, or those who have re- flected upon it, but may serve to give others out of this pale some general ideas of the actual attainments of our time, and some presage of what lies beyond it in the future. The better determination of/ what is solved and what unresolved^ and the same discrimination applied to the higher question of what things are resolvable and what irresolvable by human research, are points which may first be noted as characteristic of the science of our time. Truth and certainty are more clearly defined as the objects sought for under the conditions just B 2 4 PROGRESS OF HUMAN KNOWLEDGE. stated. These conditions, however, must not be re- ceived without limitation. The lines between the known and unknown — between the possible and im- possible — are not always drawn as distinctly as these terms assume. The boundaries are perpetually shifting, and at no period so rapidly as in our own day. Arago says : ' Celui qui, en dehors des mathematiques pures, prononce le mot impossible^ commet une imprudence.' Twenty years ago who would not have declared it impossible to detect and define metals in the sun and fixed stars, or to transmit within a few minutes a message from London to New York ? Physical science in its progress affords many such examples, though none more striking. But even here, and much more still in the physiology of life, in mental philosophy and theology, there are problems insuperable in their very nature, which men of highest capacity, willingly or unwillingly, feel as such, and submit to the limitation. The field, indeed, is ample enough for all labourers in physical science within the boundary thus defined ; and is ever enlarging in its compass. Each discovery made shadows forth new questions to be solved, often of higher import than the discovery which suggested them. Those most deeply versed in the phenomena of the natural world best apprehend the large future which lies before them. It is only in the dark circle of ignorance that knowledge is regarded as certain and complete. The ancient and mediaeval philosophers, careless, or unable to define the true objects and hmits of enquiry, have left us a large legacy of vague or incongruous PROGRESS OF HUMAN KNOWLEDGE. 5 language in philosophy and science, from the thraldom of which we are hardly yet emancipated. I need not speak of the tyranny which mere phrases often exercise over the understanding, even of the wisest. It is one of the best marks of present progress that, in natural science at least, so much has been done to rescue the mind from this tyranny of words, the coinage of older times and imperfect knowledge. Much, however, remains to be done in reforming and setthng the lan- guage even of the purest sciences. Their vocabulary has of necessity been much enlarged by their very growth, while the fact that almost all are in progressive or transitional state, renders this vocabulary in many cases conventional only, awaiting those changes which more perfect knowledge will require. Chemistry especially is in this condition, with the embarrassment of four or five rival nomenclatures to express the same existing facts. The release from the bondage of old opinions is still more marked than the changes of language. An- cient authors are now quoted, not as authorities for truth, but as indicating those earlier efforts to attain it, which form one curious page in the. history of mankind. We read the ' Timseus ' of Plato as a tissue of strange hypotheses, utterly wanting in the elements of proof. We have a more faithful interpreter of nature in Aristotle (rrig ^ucrscog ypaixfjLarsvg), eminent far above his age as an acute and zealous observer, but not recognised as such during the darkness of the mediaeval centuries. The scholastic philosophy of that period embraced only the worser part of the great works he has bequeathed to posterity. 6 PROGRESS OP HUMAN KNOWLEDGE. Partial knowledge often perplexes more, and fur- nishes larger material for false philosophy, than does sheer ignorance. Tt is the better understanding of the nature of 'proofs and the cogent demand for it, which characterise the science of our day. Taking the total circle of human knowledge, we find in this single con- dition the source of all recent progress, and the foun- dation of what is to come. The inductions of ancient philosophy, with rare exceptions, were drawn from evidence at once shallow and incomplete, unchecked by experiment or multiphed observations. The change since made forms a signal step in the intellectual advancement of man. While doubtless due in great part to the rigid demands of physical science, the in- fluence has collaterally extended to other and less de- fined branches of human knowledge. The whole may best be described as a growing demand for Truth, put before us as the end and measure of all evidence, to whatever subject directed. So in a general sense it must ever have been regarded. But the 'A?i7jflg/a 0SCOV o^jLOTToTiig of the ancients was Truth in the clouds, or seen through the mist of vague theories which no right methods of research came in aid to dispel. It must be owned, how^ever, that there are still many who live in this cloud-land of imperfect know- ledge and visionary belief. The phantasms of mes- merism, and the still worse follies or frauds of spirit- rapping, table-turning and clairvoyance, often wrapped in the phraseology of real science, deceive not only the many credulous of the world, but even some men who in other matters can justly appreciate the evidence of PROGRESS OF HUMAN KNOWLEDGE. 7 truth. Such incongruities of belief belong to every age ; but the counterfeit never gets the lasting stamp of the genuine coin. The followers of these fancies are prone to pass from one to another, allured by- novelty and more mysterious pretensions. It is a matter of mental temperament ; and, after considerable experience in life, I find myself generally able to in- dicate the persons most hable to be thus deluded. Of these mockeries of science the greater number in my time have been of imported origin ; and it may further be said that the most recent are the most preposterous — as offensive to religion as to science and common sense. Happily the progress of true knowledge is little retarded by these vagaries, which speedily efface one another. Each is destroyed in turn by the same credulity which begot it. This stricter demand for proof in every part of modern science is at once a consequence and the cause of experiment, as a main agent in research. The simple history of experiment, in its negative as well as positive incidents, is in itself a curious record of mental progress. The necessities or uses of life must have led the earliest and rudest races to tentative means, in dealing with the raw materials of food, raiment, orna- ment, and defence. But, even when we. come down to the Greeks, we find no distinct recognition of the nature and value of experiment; and encounter the strange fact of a people subtle in observation and thought, and aspiring to higher knowledge, yet failing to seize upon a method so necessary, and seemingly so 8 PROGRESS OF HUMAN KNOWLEDGE. obvious, for its pursuit ? ^ If reason did not suggest it, one might have expected accident to do so. Coming down yet later, we find still only a vague understand- ing of the term ; and scarcely half-a-dozen names (Koger Bacon foremost among them) break forth as lights of discovery amidst the darkness of many cen- turies. The researches of the alchymists were blind and next to profitless. Lord Bacon first designated the value of experiment, yet scarcely with a full ap- preciation of all its methods of proof. Though in England alone we have the names of Harvey, Boyle, Gilbert, Hales, Hopke, and the greater name of JSTew- ton, belonging to the same century, yet was the pro- gress of this principle still partial only, and hampered by adhesion to many errors of early date. And the same remark applies generally to the science of France, Germany, and Italy at this period ; great though some of the men were who adventured on new fields and methods of enquiry. Chemistry, in its successive stages, is the science which has done most to develope experiment as the great instrument of progress. Electricity, indeed, and optics (the latter in the mighty hands of Newton), furnish early examples of its employment. But chemistry, in dealing with the relations and inter- changes of matter in its most subtle shapes of atoms and molecules, comes by compulsion to experiment as the sole means of fulfiUing its objects. Analysis and ^ The exceptional instances of the researches of Archimedes— the experiments of some of the Pythagorean school on the vibrations of bodies, and a few others, do but render the general fact more striking. PROGRESS OP HUMAN KNOWLEDGE. 9 synthesis are the two great functions of the science, and thns only can these functions be rendered effective. In its present state, and irrespectively of ulterior results almost certain in prospect, chemistry is the most won- derful exponent of the power of experiment in giving man access to the inner secrets of nature and those laws which govern the material elements around us. Organic chemistry, especially in its synthetic part, has justly been called a system of atomic architecture. Working by the most refined processes of addition, ab- straction, and substitution of atoms — of difierent kinds, but ever in definite proportions of weight or measure — the chemist has been able to elaborate and arrange, in determinate series, numerous products either wholly new or created heretofore only by the hidden work- ings of organic life. Eecently these secret processes have themselves been brought into partial subjection ; and, starting from the same simple elements with which Nature works, the chemist obtains in his laboratory a long series of substances, identical in type and com- position with the products of animal and vegetable life. This may be ranked among the greatest achievements of modern science. It is due to experiment as the instrument of research — experiment so elaborate and refined, that its mere methods become a science,, irre- spectively of the results attained. Analysis, though not exercising this creative power, signally attests in its present exactness the progress of experimental science. Quantities and proportions be- fore inappreciable are now brought into strict account ; and, what is yet more worthy of note, new methods of 10 PROGRESS OF HUMAN KNOWLEDGii:. analysis, subtle almost beyond conception, have been furnished collaterally by other sciences. To the spec- trum analysis we owe already four new metals, and the detection of others before known, in combinations un- der which their infinitesimal proportions had hitherto concealed them. The analysis by diffusion and dia- lytic separation^ due to the researches of Mr. Graham, is another of these new methods, the more inte- resting from its direct relation to the atomic consti- tution and molecular changes of matter. Electricity, though still a mystery in certain of its most elementary facts, has- been a field for the highest refinements of experimental research ; illustrating by wonderful results the new and mighty power now sub- mitted to the will and uses of man. Heat, as one of the great motive forces of the universe, has been simi- larly the subject of experiment, creating what might be called a science in itself, were it not so closely linked with other phenomena of the natural world. Light, that sister ' ofispring of heaven,' has afibrded to man one of his greatest triumphs, through those beautiful experimental researches, aided by the higher mathema- tics, which have disclosed to us the sunbeam as the most marvellous object in the natural world, and carried our knowledge yet beyond, to the sun itself — to its ele- ments and unceasing changes of state. All parts of physical science yield similar if less striking illustra- tions. All are so connected by physical relation of matter and force, that a successful experiment in one science often discloses the secrets of another seemingly far removed. PROGRESS OF HUMAN KNOWLEDGE. 11 The perfection of the instruments now applied to experimental research deserves study in itself, as an attestation of human progress. Seneca somewhere de- precates all manual methods and inventions as beneath the dignity of philosophy. Modern science dignifies and hastens to appropriate them, whatever they be. A common catalogue would contain all the admirable inventions of apparatus serving the purposes of each science, and enabling one science to minister to the progress of another. Look, for instance, at the various aids which electricity has rendered to all the sciences, through instruments depending on its pheno- mena — such as the thermoscope, the electric lamp, the electric apparatus connected with telescopes for transit observations, the electric telegraph, and the many admirable devices by which this wonderful agent — its current simply cut off or restored — is made to record almost instantaneously, whatever the distance, the words of human intercourse, and to register the most subtle phenomena of the natural wotld. The various apparatus by which the electric element itself is evolved, directed, and multiplied in quantity or inten- sity, illustrate equally well this instrumental perfection. Strange that it should have been thus far attained, while we yet are ignorant what electricity really is ! ^ What has been said of experiment as bearing on * The researches of Matteucci, Du Bois Raymond; and Helmholtz on animal electricity, and on the rate of transmission of the nervous agent through the nerves, muscles, and brain, have required and produced instrumental apparatus of the most consummate delicacy as well as complexity. The same description may be given of the instrumental means employed by Wheatstone, Foucard, and Fizeau to determine the Telocity of electricity and light. 12 PROGRESS OF HUMAN KNOWLEDGE. the progress of physical science apphes also to the knowledge got by observation. Here, again, the genius of the age has invented instrumental aids, so augment- ing the natural powers of the eye as to give access to that which is greatest and that which is least in the world around us. The telescope and microscope, both modern creations, have attained what may almost seem the hmit of perfection. But, apart from these instrumental means, the whole theory and practice of observation has undergone a conspicuous change. Phe- nomena, in every part of the natural world, disregarded before, are now registered in the great volume of Science — the simplest and most familiar often disclos- ing truths which are denied to more recondite research. Observation in its methods and records has become almost a science in itself. The senses even have been so tutored into obedience to the intellect as in some degree to augment their natural powers ; while the in- stant embodiment of every new fact observed in some record of prior knowledge gives both motive and direc- tion to those who labour in this large and fertile field. These new and various resources of physical enquiry have not merely extended all the sciences of older time, but have given origin to others unknown as such. Electricity, including the cognate phenomena of Mag- netism, is the most striking example ; since the very power itself, though pervading our globe, and probably worlds beyond, may almost be deemed a recent dis- covery. Though deahng with elements more familiar to the senses, the sciences of Light and Heat are vir- tually the creation of the last two centuries. The know- PROGRESS OF HUMAN KNOWLEDGE. 13 ledge of the fossil world, vast though its scope and attainments now are, has grown up in the course of a single lifetime. When I was at Edinburgh, from 1809 to 1811, an angry contest existed between the Plutonian and Neptunian schools of Geology. The ' Ossemens Fossiles' of Cuvier had been published a few years before ; but this great topic scarcely found place in the controversy. Its value as an index to geological ages and successions was barely understood, and its future greatness as a science wholly unseen. The term prediction^ in its strict sense, belongs almost exclusively to the science of our own day. Except in a few astronomical phenomena, the know- ledge of the ancients never reached to this highest ex- pression of intellectual power and progress. The faculty of predicting, through known phenomena, others yet unseen and unknown, needs no epithets to mark its import. It is, in fact, the nearest approach made to those higher laws through which the Creator acts in the natiu-al world, and is due mainly to that increasing exactness of experiment and observation, of which number, weight, and measure are the practical exponents. Savoir pour prevoir is the key to all scien- tific predictions. Every branch of physical knowledge is rich in examples of them. Astronomy, Optics, Chemistry, and Electricity furnish the most striking — such as the elliptic polarisation of light — the discovery of new metals by spectrum analysis — the discovery of Neptune through the perturbations of Uranus — the discovery of numerous chemical compounds through the laws of atomicity and definite proportions, &c. 14 PROGRESS OF HUMAN KNOWLEDGE. While recognising these results of the human intellect as best marking man's place in creation, it is needful to note how few there are capable of reaching them. In comparison with men thus endowed, able to bring their endowments into action, how endless the multitudes of all times and races of men, the cyphers of creation, who tenant the earth in successive generations, without leaving traces of their existence behind ! A clearer perception of the instantice crucis, grow- ing out of the more rigid demand for proofs, is one of the characteristics of modern science. The value of these cannot easily be overrated. Kept closely before the mind, they give stability to actual knowledge, and starting-points for its future extension. There is no single well-assured truth, however limited its seeming import, which may not become the germ of others. It is a part of wisdom to store the mind with instances of this kind, which appertain to general philosophy and theology as well as to physical science. The simpler such instances are the better. If encumbered with details, their pertinency and practical value are pro- portionally impaired. In a record of the progress of the physical sciences it is fitting to note the curious halts or arrests often occurring in connexion with some particular theory or fresh discovery of facts. Many retrospective instances might be given of these unstable resting-places in our knowledge. The doctrine of Phlogiston in its origin and fate is one of the most familiar. The doctrines of Elective Affinity held by the earher chemists, and PKOGRESS OF HUMAN KNOWLEDGE. 15 the theory of an acidifying principle derived from the discoveries of Lavoisier, are other examples in point, as is also the Emission theory of Light, long implicitly held and successfully applied to the solu- tion of many phenomena. I would cite the Primitive Cell theory of our own time as another instance. Physiologists exulted in the discovery of this common germ of all vital organisation, as though it were a ter- minus in this line of research, not duly considering that cells themselves are a product of organisation, and til at they contain matter which has better claim than its receptacle to be regarded as germinal to the won- derful varieties of life issuing therefrom. Without noting other such instances, we may set them down generally as mere pauses in the march of science — often, indeed, as convenient resting-places whence to obtain more distinct views of the objects to be sought for beyond. ^ The vast accession of knowledge to man from study of the elements of Matter and Force in the universe necessarily implies some change in the amount, as well as methods of use, of his intellectual powers. I have already spoken of the more perfect understanding of what is Truth as founded upon evidence. Inventive- ness is another faculty of mind awakened and enlarged by the researches of experimental science, as well as by that spirit of competition which civihsed hfe en- genders and sharpens. The mind grows within itself by exercise of its powers ; and we have some reason for supposing that this growth may become hereditary ; 16 PROGRESS OF HUM.iN KNOWLEDGE. not indeed by any obvious or certain law, but under conditions analogous to those by which bodily hke- ness is transmitted to successive generations. I have been illustrating the progress of human knowledge chiefly through the physical sciences ; and this, in truth, is almost a necessity of the subject. It can hardly be affirmed that mere speculative thought, apart from material research, takes a wider or bolder form than it did in the ancient philosophy. There is scarcely a single hypothesis, w^hatever the subject, which has not some prototype, more or less defined, in one school or other of the Greek, Eoman, or mediaeval ages. Man, Mind and Matter, Life, Death and Futurity, the Nature of the Deity, the Origin of Evil, &c., furnished to them, as to us, problems upon which all who have capacity for thought are in some sort compelled to exercise it. But these great ques- tions were then more loosely propounded and vaguely pursued. Physical science in those times lent little aid either by facts or methods of enquiry, and induc- tions were drawn from evidence the most incomplete. The condition of the world too is changed. Thoughts and speculations are no longer soHtary and exclusive, or limited to particular schools and forms. Know- ledge has become a common heritage, expanded and enriched by free and rapid intercourse over every part of the habitable globe. Nevertheless the dif- ference just denoted is ever present to observation. The physical sciences have rapidly and universally advanced. Metaphysical questions, though better de- fined in their purport, remain unsolved in their iilti- PROGRESS OF HUMAN KNOWLEDGE. 17 mate truths, and are so transmitted from one age to another. One other indication, and that a striking one, of the recent progress of natural science, is still to be mentioned. I allude to the much closer connection established, not merely among the labourers in this great field, but also among the objects of their labour. Sciences which, as we formerly comprehended and pur- sued them, seemed to have no common kindred, are now seen to be linked together by relations depending on those higher laws of matter and force which govern the natural world. These new relations (or correla- tions^ to use an adopted term) are not only of deep interest in themselves, but they open a way towards that profound philosophy which seeks to give a certain unity to the whole. To what extent the bold aspira- tion of Laplace in this direction may hereafter be realised, it would be hard to say. He has himself used the pregnant phrase, 'Notre ignorance est im- mense.' But that^we shall approach much nearer to this attainment than we have yet done, is testified by the whole history of modern science — a history which continued half a century hence will, I feel assured, embody results far beyond all present contemplation. Electricity and Atomic Chemistry alone are volumes leaving ample space for the records of future discovery. I may notice, before closing this paper, those bold generalisations in science which occur from time to time, marking the genius of the men propounding them, and often serving a higher purpose as regards science itself. Take, for instance, the expression of c 18 PROGRESS OF HUMAN KNOWLEDGE, Kepler, ' Nego ullum motuum perennem non-rectum a Deo conditam esse ' — or that dogma of Leibnitz, that nothing in nature occurs per saltum, or without a sufficient reason why it should be so rather than other- wise — or Pascal's definition of eases where, though two contraries are severally inconceivable, one must neces- sarily be true — or a more specific generalisation in natural history, that there is no living being whose form is geometrically regular, nor any living form having plane faces. . . . Such generalisations, of which many others might be cited, have their value even in the exceptions and contradictions they evoke. The discussion of these often leads to still higher laws, embracing the very exceptions which create the controversy. 19 UNITY OF THE CREATIVE POWER THROUGHOUT CREATION. [Writteh in 1867.] As a general question this is answered by general belief. But what we call belief in the world is often only vague conception or unmeaning assent. It is well to hold in hand, for ready use, some special evidences for a truth thus momentous — one so closely connected with the attribute of individuality and design in the Creator. Astronomy, through its wonderful interpreter, light, gives answer for that which is most remote in universal space. The most minute telescopic stars, the faintest forms of nebulae transmit hght to us, and are known to exist solely by this transmission. If there be any elemental power, having true and proper unity, it is that of hght as it comes to us from the celestial bodies. The laws of its reflection, refraction, and polarisation are the same, as well as the rate of motion through space, shown by the phenomena of aberration ; while the photographic image of Sirius (a star having a parallax of little more than a quarter of a second) gives proof of a chemical action of light from this enormous distance identical in kind with that of our sun, or of the artificial Hghts we create for experiment in our lecture-rooms. c 2 20 UNITY OF THE CKEATIYE POWER. Nor does the argument for Unity, derived from light, stop here. Eecent researches have disclosed in the spectra of several of the fixed stars certain lines, exactly corresponding with lines in the solar spectrum. The latter, by an admirable series of experiments and deductions, has already shown the existence in the sun of various elements, chiefly metals, familiar on our own globe — a discovery which ratified at once the boldest assumptions of hypothesis. Conjectures, invited to the question by the analysis of aerohtes, and by other con- siderations, have now been realised, not for our solar system only, but for worlds and systems so remote in space that their fight takes years to reach our globe. Waves of light which quitted the surface of Sirius thus long before make known to the human enquirer the identity of certain material elements there w^ith those famihar to him by every day's sight and use on the earth. Other stars, similarly examined through the identity of these spectrum lines, extend the same pre- sumption to other parts of sidereal space ; while light itself, in disclosing thus far the sameness of material out of which those vast works of creation have been elaborated, declares its own identity throughout the universe, as their exponent and interpreter. Taking the w^hole together, it is an argument for the unity of creation more perfect and more profound than seemed within the power of man to attain. Light, then, the fountain of all our knowledge of the universe without, might alone almost suffice in demonstration of the truth we seek for. But the me- chanism of the heavens also, as it comes interpreted UNITY OF THE CREATIVE POWER. 21 to US by matter and motion, and signally by that great force of gravitation on which these motions depend, is another explicit declaration of the Unity pervading the most remote parts of space. The accordances here shown to exist, and in some cases even predicted, are such as to exclude all idea of fortuitous relation. A common cause of power can alone be brought to the explanation of effects thus universal to our knowledge. And other great forces also, as Heat, and Electri- city in its different forms, concur severally as well as conjointly in the same proof. Heat, as an agent, we can scarcely dissever from light in our own solar sys- tem ; and we have every reason to presume the relation to be the same wherever light exists.^ Of electricity, whether under its condition of magnetic force or in other forms, we must speak with less assurance ; yet with strong presumption that this element, whatever its intrinsic nature, is largely concerned in the pheno- mena of universal ^reation. Take a single fact in evi- dence, and this from beyond the confines of our own system. When we find iron as a constituent of so many of the fixed stars, how can we justly suppose that a metal so strongly characterised by its magnetic properties on earth should be devoid of these relations in any region of space however remote ? If this in- ference be just, it involves collateral conclusions over which we can scarcely impose a limit. The magnetic force existing in these stellar worlds denotes the pre- * Since thia was written, the admirable methods employed by Mr. Higgens with the thermopile have given well-assured proofs of heat derived from Sirius, Arcturus, and others of the fixed stars. 22 UNITY OF THE CEEATIVE POWER. sence and action there of that great electric element which, from the universahty of its functions on our own globe, we might well assume to be a cosmical agent in the larger sense of the term ; expressing as such the unity as well as grandeur of the creative power. If there be doubt as to electricity or magnetic power pervading other systems than our own, there can be none as to that great power of gravitation — an attribute of all matter ; and by its determinate laws interpreting to us the movements not solely of our own planets and comets, but of many of those nume- rous double and multiple stars which the telescope grasps and defines. Orbits and periods depending upon this law — ' the pendulums of eternity,' as they have been called — are calculated for worlds a million times more remote from us than we are distant from the sun. In our own system Laplace has applied his ' Cal- cul des Probabilites ' to the modes of motion of the several planets and satellites ; and he expresses by the ratio of four millions to unity the presumption of a single original cause producing these motions. Such presumption to human reason is equivalent to a cer- tainty. No doubt, indeed, can disturb conclusions as to unity of origin derived from these phenomena. Kone but a single Creative Power, define it how we will, can be concerned in evolving laws thus congruous, uni- versal, and absolute. Another argument, though less cogent, is furnished by what may be called the sidereal series of the uni- verse, ascending from our sun and planetary system to UJSITY OF THE CREATIVE POWER. 23 other suns and their sateUites or companions, disclosed to us by the telescope — from these subordinate stars or systems, scarcely numerable by man, to the Milky Way, which embodies them all — and from this again to other nebulous systems, whatever their nature, now counted almost by thousands in the vault of space. The relation here, as far as reason can compass objects thus vast, is that of a Unity of Creative Power. All this evidence comes from the universe without. That derived from our own globe, though different in the scale of the objects and actions concerned, is not less conclusive. In its most general form (that which we are now seeking to obtain) we find this evidence in the mutual and uniform relations of the different kinds of matter on the earth — relations inter se^ as well as to those elemental forces of Heat, Light, Electricity, Gra- vitation, &c. ever acting around or within them, under precise laws and with mutual and constant equivalence of effects. Thei whole series of chemical phenomena, and especially of organic chemistry, as construed by the atomic theory and the law of definite proportions, gives continuous and complete proof of the Unity of the scheme, complex though it be, to w^hich these actions belong. One original source of power can alone be concerned in effects so perfectly congruous and co-ordinate. The farther we advance in the science of molecular physics, the wider becomes the scope of the evidence which retains its constancy, even when thus derived from the most secret recesses of the natural world. The argument for Unity is the same when we look 24 UNITY OF THE CREATIVE POWER. to those elements and actions through which the various forms of organic Hfe come into being, and severally fulfil the conditions of their existence. The typical characters so strongly marked in this great scheme, equally among existing and fossil forms, show a common power and intention pervading the whole. The mutual adaptations, uses, and instincts of animal life more especially, and the relations of this life to the varying conditions of the outer world, all enforce the same conclusion. It is not enfeebled by the doubts now thrown on the origin and perpetuity of species. If these be evolved, not by specific acts of creation, but by successive changes from a few primitive types, the argument still stands good for a single original power, endowing organic life with that capacity for progressive change which science is now seeking to explore. Neither does the mixture of seeming ills and im- perfections in animal life on the earth annul the conclusion at which we arrive. The good and the evil, taking our imperfect judgment of what belongs to these names, are closely interwoven in the same work — whether from an unknown necessity, or from mere contingency, or from some unseen higher pur- pose, no natural philosophy has yet fully explained. The question, in fact, merges in the higher one of the Origin of Evil in the world — that problem which has perplexed the wisest and most devout minds in all ages. But whatever view be taken of it, we need not recur to any Manichgean doctrine of an antagonistic power to meet the difficulty. The argument we have UNITY OF THE CREATIVE POWER. 25 dwelt upon for the . Unity of creation fully suffices to refute any such hypothesis, which could not indeed solve the problem for us if adopted. This argument, I may add, does not go a step beyond the affirmation of unity. All that regards time, material, and method in the acts of creation may be put apart, as knowledge to be reached only rela- tively and remotely. What human enquiry may rightly seek to attain is a larger knowledge of pheno- mena, and of those correlations among them which go to estabHsh more general laws, and, by removing anomalies, to give still higher conceptions of Unity in the imi verse — lofty functions in themselves of human reason, and sufficient in scope to employ the genius and industry of ages to come. X 26 PLURALITY OF WORLDS— ARE OTHER PLANETS INHABITED? A QUESTION Dot of curiosity only, but, if capable of being answered, even presumptively, one of profound interest to our conceptions of the universe and of its Creator. Life, physical and intellectual, is highest among the wonders of creation. To gain the convic- tion that it is not limited to the globe we inhabit, is to enlarge our views of that Supreme Power which de- signed and brought it into being. Neither in the Old or New Testament do we find a distinct answer to the question, though perhaps a few inferential allusions to it. The same may be said of the classical writers : Plato, Aristotle, Lucretius, and Seneca, as far as I can recollect, are silent on the subject. Pliny, who grasps at everything known or imagined, is equally so. The explanation of this is doubtless to be found in the grand error of all ancient astronomy as to the locus standi of our globe in the planetary system and universe at large. The argument for life existing in the planets of our system is summarily this. The earth, tenanted, as we see it, by man and innumerable lower forms of life, is but one in the series of satellites of the sun; intermediate to the others in distance and size, but without any marked specialty in its astronomical PLURALITY OF WORLDS. 27 relations. All are alike in general configuration, all subject to the same laws of gravitation, revolution, and rotation on axis.^ Solar light and heat are com- mon to all, with diversities only of degree. Eeflected light is conveyed to several of them, in some propor- tion to their distance from the sun, and by the agency of moons. It is hardly conceivable that such physical relations and resemblances as these should exist without the presence of life, and intelligence also, in the worlds so related to us. Can the earth be thus peopled with all its various Hving forms, and the other planets be mere brute globes of matter, with no breath of vitality upon them ? The argument, as one of strong presumption, might almost be vested in this simple question. If a single case were taken for special illustration, it might be that of Venus and the earth. The magnitude of the two planets is almost exactly the same. The earth is c seen from Venus, as Venus is by us ; the only differ- ence depending on Venus being one-third nearer to ^ the sun. The mass and density of both globes are nearly alike. The time of rotation on axis differs by forty minutes only. The larger reception of light and heat by Venus, and the appendage of a moon to the earth (facts not perhaps without relation to each other), are the sole physical differences obvious to us between the two planets. Can one of tliem be devoid of all life, while on the other it is swarming so variously and ^ In his ' Calcul des Probabilites/ Laplace shows that there are 4,000,000 to one in favour of the forty-three motions of rotation and reyolution of planets and satellites from east to west being produced by one and the same original cause. 28 PLUEALITY OF WORLDS. profusely, culminating through a long series of grada- tions in the supremacy of man ? The diversity in the physical conditions of the several planets, great though it be, does not seriously affect our conclusion. Many of these differences are of degree only ; and even as regards the material com- position of these great globes, recent discussions have shown us that the same elementary matters exist throughout, however various the manner of their con- solidation or their proportion in each planet. But whatever the physical diversities in parts of the system, it is still a system, and brought into being by that Power which, in endowing the earth with such various faculties and forms of hfe, has almost attested to us the same will and power directed to other worlds than our own. The vast distance between Mercury and Neptune is bridged over by intervening planets and their satellite moons — the latter themselves a volume of argument in the question. Is it likely that the earth, intermediate in the series, and marked by no obvious specialty of position or physical characters, should alone have the prerogative of life upon it ? The objection that to people the other planets with living beings we must suppose very different endow- ments from those which belong to hfe on the earth, is one that goes far to answer itself. The full admis- sion of this fact need in no way impair our belief. We have but to look at the endless and wonderful diversities of life which surround us here, and to the changes from physical causes of which they are seve- rally susceptible, to see that no limit can be set to PLURALITY OF WORLDS. 29 special adaptations, where the prevision and power to adapt are so manifest to our reason. The various cH- mates and conditions of the earth itself interpret to us in their effects endless possibilities of existence in other worlds than our OAvn. The arguments which serve to this conclusion re- garding the planets do not apply to that mighty central globe, ' lo ministro maggior della natura,' which fulfils the great function of keeping all in their orbits and giving light and heat to all. We cannot prove or presume anything beyond this, nor indeed conceive a habitable world in this great focus of ilhmitable forces. But the argument again opens upon us, when proceed- ing further into the depths of space, and discovering, among what we call the fixed stars, numerous systems of suns and satelhtes, having kindred with our own in the phenomena of gravitation and revolution. Tele- scopic vision tells us distinctly of these wonderful and complex relations in what to the naked eye are but the single and immovable stars of heaven. The light which solely gives us knowledge of their existence, though taking years for its transit through intervening space, reaches the earth with properties essentially the same as the beam coming direct from the sun — not, indeed, affording sensible heat, save in a few instances, to the keen scrutiny of modern research, but yielding photographs by its chemical action, and certain of those spectrum hues, which tell of material elements in those remote worlds analogous to, in fact identical with, some of the components of our own globe. This last wonderful attainment of human research is prolific 30 PLURALITY OF WORLDS. of suggestions as to that unity of creation which em- braces in itself the argument we have in hand. These proofs then are strong in presumption, though less cogent than the argument as applied to the planets of the solar system. It would be going back to the very infancy of human intelligence to suppose these innumerable stars, thus far known to us, to be mere barren masses of unorganised matter, with no higher destiny belonging to them. Can our conceptions of the Deity, based upon what we see in our own little world, justify any such conclusion? Theology may be silent on the subject, but such silence need not enthral those higher conceptions which astronomy furnishes of the unity as well as grandeur of the creation. The only author who with any abihty seeks to impugn the opinion I am defending, is my excellent friend the late Master of Trinity. In his volume, whimsically entitled the ' Plurality of Worlds,' he ably urges all that can be said against it, dwelling especially on the fact that the earth itself was left during in- calculable ages as a lifeless globe, or maintaining only those lowest conditions of life which, though members of the series, and even agents in forming many of the strata on which man has his abode, do yet feebly re- present that higher vitality which now exists on our globe. The argument thence drawn is simply this : If the earth did thus exist through ages, why may not the other planets remain in the same state to per- petuity ? The question is best answered by another. If the earth, passing through these preliminary stages. PLURALITY OF WORLDS. 31 has become, either by a designed method or by con- jectured causes of change, the abode of the higher animals and of man, why may not the other planets have passed through the same or analogous conditions and attained the same result ? Both questions are of presumption only. The latter, I think, has greater weight in the argument ; and we cannot reasonably admit any dogma of ancient theology or inference from Scriptural language, which some have brought into it, to annul the conclusion so obtained. Taking the whole problem in its simplest form, it will be seen as one never to be solved by absolute proof, but admitting of strong presumptive evidence, which is likely to become still stronger with increased knowledge of the physical conditions of the planets themselves. The track of recent discovery has lain in this direction, and no Hmit can yet be assigned to its further pursuit. 32 MATTER AND FORCE, IN PHYSICAL PHENOMENA. All physical science and philosophy are concentrated in these two terms. They have furnished, of late more especially, the text for much and various discussion — discussion, to which the obscurity as well as grandeur of the ultimate truths involved in them has given addi- tional zest. The two words have been seized upon, indeed, with a curious avidity, and made to sub- serve speculations at once vague and incongruous. I can count a dozen books, and many more articles, which during the last few years have dealt with the questions they involve. Some speculators (for specula- tion it must still be called) merge matter wholly in force. Others see force only through the conditions of matter. Without assuming to add anything new on the subject, I take it up as one on which I seek to get some understanding of what has already come, or may come, within the scope of human enquiry. The need of a just definition of the two words is that first felt. Force, or power, that acts; matter, that which is seen, or sensibly known, to be acted upon — these are the elements of the problem, but too general in their expression to be of much service to us. We are met in limine by questions hard of solution. Is force really an entity of power distinct from matter ? MATTER AND FORCE, IN PHYSICAL PHENOMENA. 33 or is it but an abstraction, an expression for matter under different modes of existence and action ? Or speaking of what are termed forces severally — me- chanical, chemical, calorific, electrical, &c. — seeing that they are for the most part mutually convertible, and under equivalents of power — for this power is never extinguished — may there not be some yet undiscovered unity for all, modified by the conditions under which it acts, and possibly including even gravitation and vital force in the one category? Such questions carry us to the extreme verge of physics, if not indeed beyond. They have perplexed schools of philosophy in every age, and inevitably so. Matter, the substratum of all that is present to the senses, is seen at every moment to undergo changes from powers, of which the senses give us no cogni- sance. What are these unseen forces — call them ^vvdfJLug, evi^ysia, vis viva, potential energy, plastic force, Krafte, or whatever the diversities or the impo- tence of language may suggest — which thus give move- ment and change to the material world ? What is the matter itself, thus acted upon? Is it something brought into existence by a Creative Will of higher ,date — or is it eternal in itself, and that with which the Creator worked in evolving and giving laws to the visible universe ? The questions thus denoted struck the ancient philosophers as they do us, and were answered with greater audacity from the absence of those checks which inductive science imposes. The terms to -Kcttryov and to TroioiJi/ briefly express the groundwork of the problem in the Greek philosophy. M MATTER AND FORCE, IN PHYSICAL PHENOMENA. Cicero and Seneca denote the points in question clearly and compendiously. They have furnished food for thought and speculation to our own age under the stricter conditions of inductive philosophy. The en- quiry, in truth, is pressed upon us as a necessity of our reasoning faculties ; but it has become a privilege also, by giving the mind access to higher laws and relations than ever entered into the conceptions of ancient philosophy. To reciu? to the relation of Matter and Force as the great question of all, we may at once put aside the enquiry whether matter be eternal or created, as one unapproachable by reason. Its existence through all time, or its creation at a given time, are alike incom- prehensible. Equally must be put aside all that con- cerns the definition of matter in the abstract, and that relation of its existence to the percipient mind, which has been the metaphysical wrangle of ages. When Mr. Mill says that matter may be defined as ' the per- manent possibility of sensation,' we see, though dimly, what he means, but gain little by the definition. For all piu'poses of reason and research we must be content to deal with its forms and properties, as they reach us, through the senses, and convey perceptions to our consciousness. Subject matter to metaphysical pressure, and it is lost to human reason. Fortunately physical science has not been led astray by these vagaries of philosophy. It regards matter in a real sense, as made up of parts or atoms of inconceivable minuteness and mobihty — each atom, whatever its elementary nature, having its individual properties and relations to others, MATTER AND FORCE, IN PHYSICAL PHENOMENA. 35 whether similar or different in kind — which properties and relations brought into action by what we call the forces of nature, give origin to all the motions, combi- nations and forms of matter, living and lifeless, which we see around us. Few of these general definitions in science have much real value. That just given ex- presses at least all the essential facts ; and if omitting one recent doctrine, viz., that it belongs to all material atoms to be ever in motion^ this omission is justified by the impossibility of ever reaching the conclusion by proofs. If it be difficult to define Matter, not less difficult is it to give an unexceptionable definition of Force. The very word carries vdth it a harsh compulsion of use. We cannot dispense with some such term in physical science, nor find perhaps in common lan- guage any that is better. The need is to express a power, or powers — immaterial for aught we can affirm to the contrary — by which matter is put and kept in state of motion or change. Difficulties of conception, ambiguities of language, and problems imperfectly solved, meet us here at the very threshold. One such question I have already noticed. Are these forces or powers, engaged in the actions of matter (and we shall see how numerous are the forms they assume), really distinct from it? or are they but properties or con- ditions of matter itself, evolved through the relations and interchanges of its elementary parts, and mutually convertible, so that action or force is never lost or lessened in total amount, but simply translated from one form to another ? Modern science shows a leaning d2 36 MATTER AND FORCE, IN PHYSICAL PHENOMENA. towards the latter belief. Heat, for instance, is inter- preted (long ago by partial conjecture) as one mode of motion in the molecules of bodies, communicable in the same form, or convertible into other forms of power, with an exact mensurable equivalence of each and all. This convertibility and equivalence lead us forward to what seems to be a great natural truth. They ex- press the principle, that force, whatever it intrinsically be, is, like matter, never lost in the world — perhaps we might say in the universe — around us. Translated or altered in mode of action it may be, but not annihi- lated. This is a vast and bold conclusion, yet so far pressed upon us by experimental facts, that it cannot logically be evaded. It moreover connects together the different kinds or exponents of force by a strong natural link — one expressive of some higher unity, to which science is now more than ever tending. Heat, electricity, chemical affinities, and the mechanical powers come more especially under this connexion ; and are subjected to formulas, which not only expound but predict results. The indestructibility of matter is an ancient tenet of philosophy ^ — that of force may be called a discovery of our own time ; indicated indeed by Newton, as a result of reason, but now amply at- tested by experimental research. * We gather from Plutarch a dogma of Pythagoras : — . . piiatQ ovdet'hc; iarlv tKaarovj 'AXXa fiovov fi'i^iQ Tf Sid\\a^i<; Tt fnytrTOJr, To this may be added the well-known lines of Lucretius : — ' Hand igitur redit ad Nihilum res ulla, sed omnes Discidio redeunt in corpora Material j ' and elsewhere he states that the Summa of Matter remains ever the same. MATTER AND FORCE, IN PHYSICAL PHENOMENA. 37 The subjection of botli matter and force, in the common comprehension of the terms, to this great law of indestructibihty, and the correlation of certain forces in every act of physical change, press upon us the conclusion that they are in their very nature a necessity to each other — a phrase the most positive we are entitled to use in a matter thus perplexing to all philosophy. Force, apart from something on which it acts, is an unmeaning word. Boscovich, as well as some later philosophers, have sought indeed to give to it a more distinct identity ; and to regard all material phenomena in reference to centres or lines of force as existences per se. Such mode of regarding the subject has a determinate value, considered as a method of enquiry. In Hke manner, motion may be dealt with mathematically, apart from matter or force. But neither in the so-called science of kinematics, nor in the doctrines of abstract force, do we find a solution of those profound problems which these several rela- tions involve. We cannot separate, save for especial purposes of enquiry, things thus closely and indissolubly bound together in the natural world. I have spoken of this relation of matter and force as one of mutual necessity of existence. It has been sought by some, as already stated, to carry the identity farther, and to consider each form of force as a par- ticular mode or condition of matter. This conception, if it could be generahsed as a truth, would bring us nearer to the kernel of the question. But we are still far from such attainment, and fresh obstacles occur at every step. Granting that the states and changes of 38 MATTER AND FORCE, IN PHYSICAL PHENOMENA. matter are the sole exponents of what we call forces, we still cannot annul the notion of power, other than the matter itself^ as initiating and evolving these actions. Eefine upon the atomic theory to the uttermost, and show the mutual convertibility of forces by the different material media through which they act — high achieve- ments these of our own time — the question still presses upon us. How are initiated^ how maintained, these various and unceasing motions of matter, in masses or molecules, lifeless or organised into life ? Would they not, if depending solely on causes intrinsic to matter itself, neutralise each other in process of time, and sub- side into absolute repose ? Must we not thenJook to some cause of action from without — some power or powers to which no material attributes can be assigned, and which may possibly operate in other effects, not yet grasped by human observation ? It is hardly possible to deal with this subject other- wise than interrogatively. Take heat, for example — a power familiar in one form or other to every moment of our existence, and closely connected with the mole- cular theory, both by thermometric conditions and by the more obscure conditions of radiant, specific, and latent heat. If, in comphance with modern views, we regard heat as one mode of motion of matter, we come upon the question, — whence originated the movements, propagated thus endlessly, in every form and degree, by and through the atoms or molecules of the material world ? Is it a condition native to, and embodied in, matter, and expressed to our senses and instruments in the various acts by which calorific equilibrium is MATTER AND FORCE, IN PHYSICAL PHENOMENA. 39 broken or restored ? Or must we, as stated above, bring in some cause, extraneous to matter itself, as originating those atomic motions which we characterise as the phenomena of heat ? To go to the great foun- tain of heat in the sun, is but to shift the question a step higher. And it is not a mere verbal question, since we cannot construct a theory of heat without recognising, not solely the modes of motion of matter, but also the existence of forces on which these motions depend. It might almost seem here as if reason got into a trap of its own making. We call in powers from without, to which matter is subordinate, though necessary for their manifestation ; and invoking these powers, we are left with the problem of their nature unsolved. This illustration presents fresh difficulties when we come to the phenomena of latent heat, and propound the view, now generally adopted, that heat, as a force, imbibed originally from the sun by vegetable life on the earth, and following the conversion of the latter into coal, has been stored up latently for untold ages in a mineral form, to be developed in the furnaces of our own day. We cannot disprove this, or bring other more conceivable solution of this great natural pro- blem. But when we speak of heat as a force consist- ing integrally of certain atomic motions in bodies, which force may be pent up for ages within these atoms, ever ready for extrication, we are boun^ to look fairly at the abstruse conceptions these things in- volve ; if indeed they can be truly understood in any other sense than as a method of expressing phenomena. 40 MATTER AND FORCE, IN PHYSICAL PHENOMENA. The word Force, with all the adjuncts that have been impressed upon it, still looms before us, as a mysterious symbol, rather than an intelligible reahty. What I have said as to heat applies alike to other forms or agents of force, into which it is more or less directly convertible. The manifestations of these powers are in matter, but we cannot affirm that they are iden- tical with or originate in matter. In truth, the material theory of heat, so ably expounded by Tyndall, em- bodies more of proof than we can bring to any other of the so-called natural forces. In chemical actions, indeed, including crystallisation, we interpret the phe- nomena through atomic motions and changes, strictly defined by laws of number, proportion and figure. Though we know that light as an agent pervades and afiects matter in its intimate atomic structure, the evi- dence here is less complete than that regarding heat. Of electricity as a force I have spoken in another of these papers. In all these innumerable and subtle phenomena of attraction, repulsion, polarisation, &c. we see a general concurrence of actions, derived ft'om what we must call force, in default of other and better name. If this be primarily resident in the atoms them- selves, still must we recognise it by some name as a principle of motion and change. Mechanical force, whether derived from gravita- tion or other cause, has been a favourite topic even from the infancy of science — partly from its practical value, partly because lending itself to certain abstruse conceptions, grateful to the genius of ancient philo- sophy ; and indeed descending, by a sort of compulsion, MATTER AND FORCE, IN PHYSICAL PHENOMENA. 41 to our own time. The terms, potential energy, actual or dynanic energy, tension, vis viva, &c. (Spanne- Krafte and lebendige Krafte) express conditions which we must needs admit, by whatever name we desig- nate them. I have already alluded to the phrase of latent heat, and the difficulty it involves is the same when it is applied to power or energy of any kind, stored up in a quiescent state for development into future action. We know from ample proof the infinite minute- ness of the ultimate parts of matter, and also the enor- mous energy of the forces on which their atomic actions depend. But while recognising these truths as neces- sary to any theory whatsoever, they give us no conception in what such latent power consists ; whether in some physical condition of the atoms themselves, or in some unseen and nameless element of force to which matter in all its forms is subjected. These questions and com- plex relations, which it perplexes language to express, might well be deemed Id scru table, were it not a wrong to science, already advanced beyond so many seeming limits, to suppose it incapable of reaching higher gene- ralisations than those now attained. In looking to the chance of bringing the several natural forces to the unity of some such higher law, we cannot omit consideration of two of them which stand in some sort apart from the rest, though ever acting in concurrence with, or relation to, them. I mean gravitation and the vital force — powers widely different in themselves, both unknown to us in their in- trinsic nature and origin, but well-defined, respectively. 42 MATTER AND FORCE, IN PHYSICAL PHENOMENA. by their wonderful phenomena, and the laws which govern them. Of vital force — that which gives form, function, and transmission of like qualities to successive living organisations — I have spoken in others of these papers, for the topic is one closely connected with some of the most profound questions of our time. The term vital principle has been reprehended as denoting what is un- proven and needless, and certain writers have banished it from their philosophy. But that there is some power or force, name it as we will, working upon matter as its subject and instrument in the creation and mainte- nance of the various forms of life, cannot be denied without at once casting aside all argument on the sub- ject. To say that a nisus^ or power inherent in matter itself, can create a series of living beings, of definite forms and functions, is either a mere naked assertion utterly without proof, or a virtual admission of vital force under another form of words. The generation of life from life is, and perhaps ever will be, one of the in- solvable mysteries of philosophy. But that it involves some special power distinct from matter, and not iden- tical with any of the other forces known to us, must, in my mind, be taken as a truth furnishing a fair resting- place for our present knowledge. If asked what this vital force is, we may answer by the counter-questions, What is gravitation ? What that force which puts the ether of space into those marvellous movements which we receive as light and heat? These problems are all of the same character, including questions with which no reasoning or conception can cope. MATTER AND FORCE, IN PHYSICAL PHENOMENA. 43 And among these questions comes one of deep in- terest, closely connected with the theory of vital force, viz., the force of the will, an entity not less real in its action on matter than those other unseen powers which we have been denoting. Whatever definition of force be adopted, this comes integrally under it. Nothing is gained in the way of distinction by bringing the word spiritual into the argument. This presents the mystery of force under another phrase, but leaves still unre- solved that problem as to nature and origin which re- gards force in its every form. The word looms before us as an incomprehensible abstraction, yet, logically considered, as much a reality as the matter on which it acts. Much has been thought and written on the subject of gravitation ; and this is not surprising, seeing that it brings the relation of matter and force into the most simple and exphcit form. In this simplicity, however, there still lies the same profound obscurity. A force pervading the universe, and so known in its great laws, that through them the astronomer can predict the existence and place of planets yet unseen, is neverthe- less hidden from us in its origin, in its manner of trans- mission through space, and in its mode of relation to the matter on which it so universally acts. One might describe it as a power inherent and incorporate in mat- ter itself, were it not that such terms are little more than a shelter for our ignorance. We can more clearly denote it, as a force of comparatively httle energy where minute particles are concerned, but deriving from concentration of units of power that higher energy 44 MATTER AND FORCE, IN PHYSICAL PHENOMENA. whicli renders it the great motor in the universe. It combines with, or is modified by, other motor forces, as in the rotation of the earth, but we cannot corre- late it with any of those which exhibit polarities or dualities of action, and are mutually convertible under equivalents of change. Gravitation still stands alone in the simple sublimity of its one great law. If we ever get nearer to a true theory of the power, it will probably be through some new knowledge of the atomic conditions of matter. To these infinitesimal parts, and their attractions and rej^ulsions, we may best look for the source of a power universal and perma- nent ; and however vague the conception, there is none other to which we can attach belief The theory of Mosolti (anticipated by (Epinus) taking this founda- tion, sought in mathematical forms to derive gravity as a residual power from a balance of attractions and re- pulsions, with the postulate of an electric atmosphere to each atom. This hypothesis, like that of Lesage, has lain dormant ever since. It wants the evidence of facts, though justified, I think, in thus seeking through individual atoms the origin of a power so manifestly derived from the concentration of individual forces. But even could proof be pushed thus far, there still remains the crucial question. What is the power pro- ducing these atomic conditions or actions, which, con- centrated more or less, we call gravitation ? It is in effect the same question already applied to other modes of force. Are they actual powers extraneous to matter though acting upon it ? Or may we gene- ralise yet farther, in supposing a single force in the MATTER AND FORCE, IN PHYSICAL PHENOMENA. 45 natural world, modified by the matter on which it acts ? We pass here, however, into the region of meta- physical subtleties, and the most daring hypothesis is' lost in a wilderness of words. Yet it is a tempting track ; and the most sober philosophers have exercised themselves on the questions collateral to it. How is this force of gravitation concentrated, and how pro- pagated through space ; giving power to the sun to contain the planets in their orbits, and bring back the comet from its distant aphehon — agitating and raising the oceans of our own globe by an influence thus un- seen and remote ? The law of proportion to distance we know ; but this tells us nothing beyond the pre- sence of the power, whatever it be, at each and every point of intervening space. Newton strongly expresses the impossibility of conceiving that one body can act upon another without the interposition of something to convey continuity of force. To satisfy this demand for a material medium for other elemental forces, the aid of ether has been invoked — a mighty invocation, since as regards gravitation and light at least, it must ex- tend to all known celestial space. On this subject I have written in another of these papers. It may well be termed a transcendental branch of science, compris- ing some of the most profound problems an which human reason can exercise itself. I have spoken above of atomic or molecular attrac- tions and repulsions, and I recur to the latter of these terms, as indicating another of those questions which perplex the theory of forces tovour understanding. We speak of the attraction of gravitation as a force. 46 MATTER AND FORCE, IN PHYSICAL PHENOMENA. Must we not apply the same term to those repulsions which occur in the material world — most obviously in the atomic actions and changes of matter, and in elec- tric and magnetic phenomena ; but even, as we have some reason to suppose, in cosmical changes beyond the limits of our own globe ? Boscovich admitted this as a part of his theory of forces, and some later phy- sicists have followed him in the same view. Other forms of power, again, we designate by this one short word, so familiar in use, so difficult of scientific defini- tion. The centrifugal force, though defined only as an antagonism, must still be admitted into reality as such. The force of cohesion, denoting perhaps only one mode of action of a larger power, must yet be recognised as an exponent of phenomena which cannot otherwise be understood. The difficulties thus pressing upon every abstract conception of force in the universe are not abated when we bring the question to particular physical questions — such, for instance, as the velocity involved in the action of forces. We know from astronomical facts, with the recent concurrence of actual experi- ment, the velocity of those undulations which bring light and heat to the earth. We know that the velo- city of electrical transmission, and therefore of mag- netic force, has a close parity with this wonderful rate of motion of light. But though transcending all human conception, we are compelled, if adopting the conclusions of Laplace, to suppose an incomparably greater velocity in the force of gravitation. Time, in truth, is virtually ajinulled in estimates of this nature ; MATTER AND FORCE, IN PHYSICAL PHENOMENA. 47 and instantaneous transmission offers itself as a phrase of readier adoption, though not relieving us from the necessity of admitting a medium of transmission, and a rate of propagation through it. Eeading over what I have written, I am more than ever impressed with the conviction that we cannot deal with this subject of force otherwise than as a method of . expounding material phenomena. That there are powers (or I rather willingly say, Power) at work, distinct from matter itself, can hardlv be denied. But human reason is incompetent to grasp in their entirety these great problems of the natural world. We record innumerable appearances attesting the relations of matter and force ; and determine certain primary con- ditions necessary to their development ; and research, thus directed, will doubtless attain yet higher results. But speculations which discard these sober methods, and seek to enter per saltum into the secrets of nature and creation, generally substitute words for realities, and are for the most part upset by the progress of science itself It is a wise saying of Pascal, ' L'univers nous ecrase. C'est le privilege de I'homme de savoir qu'il est ecrase.' 48 ON MATTER, FORCE, AND MOTION IN SPACE. Though this topic has close kindred with that of the preceding paper, it embraces certain special questions in relation to the great phenomena of the natural world, which this general title may serve to designate. In using the three words, Matter, Motion, and Space, we touch upon the most profound problems of physical science, verging in part on metaphysics, yet open to research under those stricter methods which belong to the inductive philosophy of our day. The expression of ' matter moving in space ' includes actions which range from the movements of suns and planets in the seeming void of the universe, to those motions and changes which pervade matter in its ultimate atomic forms, and which are possible only through this in- finitesimal minuteness. The unity of science requires, even now, that these phenomena, however seemingly diverse, should be brought into some common relation. And the connexion so required is ever becoming closer and more apparent. Nevertheless, parts of the subject may be viewed separately, and the remarks I here make relate chiefly to those motions in miter space which connect our globe with other portions of the universe, and more especially with the planetary system to which we ON MATTER, FORCE, AND MOTION IN SPACE. 49 belong, a field large enough to expatiate in, even without regard to its continuity with space and worlds beyond. And first, as to space — that great recipient and container of all things which are the subject of human sense, and, through the senses, of human science. Putting aside the metaphysics of the Infinite, as thus applied, and the old subtleties of the plenum and vacuum controversy, the question presses upon us in this form : ' What is contained in space, beyond, and apart from, those aggregates of matter, great or small, of which our senses and other means of observation give us knowledge ? ' As early as the times of Em- pedocles and Aristotle the question of the to ^sra^v — some medium between the objects of sense and the percipient being — forced itself upon philosophy. Modern science, dating here, as in so many other cases, from the era of Newton, has given more definite form to the enquiry ; and taking certain of the great powers of nature as interpreters, has shown from these the necessity of supposing a material medium as .the sole conceivable means of their transmission through space. What there is of theory in this matter has been well borne out by observation and experiment. The interplanetary spaces of our own system, as the most accessible and fi:uitful field of research, have been zealously worked upon, with results which rank among the most wonderful attainments of science. Light, heat, and gravitation, those great elemental forces or powers, in the relations they establish between the sun and the earth, first gave a scientific character to the E 50 ON MATTER, FORCE, AND MOTION IN SPACE. • question, ' What is contained in space ? ' It was seen, under a sound philosophy, that the transmission of these powers from distant sources — as from the globe of the sun — and their modes of action on terrestrial matter could only be explained by supposing a medium through which power and action are conveyed. The same necessity leads to the belief that this medium must be material — a conviction which can only be escaped by affirming the case to be one incomprehen- sible altogether. But physical science does not submit to be thus summarily treated. The instances are numerous where natural phenomena are interpreted by numerical ex- pressions of space and time, and by modes of action, which no conception can follow, yet where conclusions are attained of almost mathematical certainty. If instances were needed, they might well be drawn from the marvellous divisibility of matter as attested by its atomic conditions — still more from the wonderful facts on which is based the undulatory theory of light. It is from the latter phenomena more especially that we deduce the necessity for a medium capable of receiving and transmitting movements of undulations or vibra- tions — conditions which matter alone can be conceived to fulfil. Such medium must from the same necessity occupy the total space between the propelhng bodies and those recipient of the motions they conveyed ; and in the case of light, at least, this conclusion carries us beyond our solar system to that universe of space, tenanted by other suns, and systems of suns, which send their light (if not heat also) to the earth, by the ON MATTER, FORCE, AND MOTION IN SPACE. 51 self-same laws of transmission. We are stopt in limine in this research, and the undulatory theory falls from under us, unless recognising some medium through which these laws may have effect.^ The question then arises, ' What is this medium thus universal through space, and how best to be defined ? ' We assume it to be material fi:'om the necessity just stated, and the term Ether has been adopted to satisfy, provisionally at least, the need of a name. From the senses we obtain no direct informa- tion as to its existence or properties, and the indirect conclusions of reason are drawn from a limited source. Imponderable we may call it, only in the sense that we cannot weigh it, since, if truly material, we must presume it subject to the common law of gravitation. We may affirm that as a material medium it is of in- finite tenuity — the matter composing it being probably simple and elementary in kind, and its atomic parts (for we must needs so name them) of such perfect mobility as to convey the most complex and dehcate undulations impressed upon them. Under the same view we may speak of the intense elasticity of the medium we are seeking to comprehend. On this point, and in regard to the existence of a self-repulsive force among the ultimate particles of ether, various hypotheses have been proposed, some of them, as those of Mosotti, aiming at a mathematical form. But no laws have * Aristotle, speaking of the to /xtra^w, adds, r) did tovtov kIvijoiq iarl rj TTOiovaa to bpav. The experiments of Balfour Stewart, indicating a certain heating effect on a disk of aluminium rapidly rotated in an air-pump vacuum, require repetition before being brought in direct proof of a material ether. E 2 52 ON MATTER, FORCE, AND MOTION IN SPACE. been reached, save such as are based on a specula- tive foundation, and therefore inadmissible into pure science. Another condition may more safely be assumed regarding ether, viz., that it is everywhere equal in quality and manner of distribution through space, ex- cept v^hen coming into connexion with matter of grosser forms. This condition, though not always regarded, is seemingly essential to the functions which ether is invoked to sustain. A medium un- equal in density or mobihty of its parts, or fluctuating in other of its properties, could hardly fulfil the con- ditions essential to the theory of light. And the same remark applies to the other offices for which we in- voke this medium of ether, as the sole method of expounding the actions and influences upon each other of bodies widely remote in space, and that retardation in the motion of certain comets which the keen eye of modern astronomy has revealed to us. Justified in speculating thus far on the endowments of ether, as the occupant of space, we can scarcely go farther without forcing that barrier which, if passed at all, can only be so by patient progress of research. Mathematical analysis bridges over many -chasms, and tells us under what conditions a given elastic medium may fulfil the functions we attribute to ether. But it does not enable us to conceive the infinitesimal minute- ness and mobility of the atoms concerned in these actions, or to comprehend their elementary nature. It tells us nothing of those interstitial spaces which must co-exist with atoms to give them free motion and elas- ON MATTER, FORCE, AKD MOTION IN SPACE. 53 ticity, and which become a new vanishing-point to our reason.^ Nor does it touch that more fundamental question, namely, the actual nature of that mysterious Power which gives origin and impulse to these won- derful waves of ether, interpreted to us by light, heat, and chemical phenomena. Difficulties of this kind are in nowise lessened when regarding ether, not merely as the medium of propa- gating impulses through outer space, but as inter- penetrating and permeating other forms of matter, such as our atmosphere and the various grosser bodies on the earth. The phenomena of light, as expounded by experiment and by mathematical enquiry into the laws of refraction, polarisation, transmission, &c. — en- quiry so searching as in some cases to have anticipated results yet unseen — all compel the admission of this behef, which conception vainly seeks to realise.^ The atomic elements of luminiferous ether and of the more palpable forms of matter — solid, fluid, or gaseous — which ether pervades, are alike beyond the reach of the boldest hypothesis. In denoting the ether of space, as the medium for transmission of power or motion from one part of the ^ The question whetlier matter can exist contimumsly — that is, with- out parts or interstices — is so far removed from all possibility of proof that it leads to little more than a play upon words. To suppose the affir- mative might solve some difficulties, but would engender others. All analogy from what we know is against it. * No science is more ennobled than Optics by the names attached to it. Those of Newton, Hooke, and Huyghens have foremost place in date ; but the present century has carried enquiry far beyond all prior limits, and the labours of Young, Fresnel^ Arago, Herschel, Brewster, Wheat- stone, Hamilton, Foucault, &c. have resulted in discoveries unsurpassed in any other branch of science. 54 ON MATTER, FORCE, AND MOTlOxX IN SPACE. universe to another, we do but give scanty description of the functions it is required to fulfil. The beam of solar light thus translated by a series of pulses rapid beyond conception in time and sequence, is in itself the most wonderful of compounds. Newton, full of the discovery he had just accomplished of the solar spectrum, quaintly describes it as ' the oddest, if not the most considerable, detection which hath hitherto been made in the operations of nature.' The more perfect analysis of this spectrum, now attained, has disclosed to us not solely the different physical pro- perties of the vibrations producing the different colours, but also those invisible rays which by their respective refrangibihties evolve heat and chemical power — these latter actions attaining their maximum respectively beyond the opposite extremities of the luminous spec- trum. Then came the further complexity of those numerous dark lines in this luminous portion, from which was inferred the non-emission of waves of colour corresponding to these lines — a naked inference now clothed with a positive cause. But the knowledge of the cause thus acquired, marking one of the most extraordinary steps in physical science, does in nowise lessen the wonder of these great natural phenomena. Putting aside the unsolved question as to the nature of the primary propelling power — (if we say it is the sun we do but screen the difficulty) — we have to look to our ether as the sole conveyance for these multi- tudinous waves, thus complex in their properties as expressed by their various action on matter, but com- plex also in the act and manner of their propagation. ON MATTER, FORCE, AND MOTION IN SPACE. 55 seeing that the modes of undulation, as regards both time and space, are different for the different coloured rays, and still more divergent in those which evoke heat and chemical effects. Add to these conditions the actual velocity of hght (185,000 miles in a second), the yet more inconceivable frequency of the oscillations transmitting it, and the nature of these vibrations — transverse to the direction of impulse — and then bring the phenomena thus denoted to the conception of a material medium evolving them through all time with- out change or interruption, and we have this great natural problem, the occupation of space, fairly before us for contemplation. Still taking our illustrations from light, we have to encounter the fact that this great agent in the universe is transmitted to us, possessed of the same properties, i.e.^ is transmitted to us in the same way, from innumer- able stars, single or aggregated into groups or nebulaB, the light from each one propagated in all directions through surrounding space. How is this endless inter- mingling of oscillations in the medium of transmission compatible with the individuality and clearness of the images they severally convey to us ? Or, giving the question its greatest generality, how do these undula- tions, issuing, primary or reflected, from every luminous body whatsoever, within or without our sphere, traverse space in all directions without conflicting, so as to in- termix and confuse sensible objects to the eye? The undulations of sound offer some important analogies here. But it is the higher prerogative of mathematics to have faced these difficulties, and through methods 56 OK" MATTER, FORCE, AND MOTIOX IN SPACE. applicable to the whole theory of undulations to have attained conclusions which no common reasoning or experiment could reach — methods which render the very multiplicity of the actions involved an exponent of their congruity and constancy. There is a certain analogy here to those researches of Lagrange and La- place, which submit even the secular perturbations of the planetary system to a principle of mutual compen- sation, acting through vast periods of time, but ever tending to maintain the order and permanence of the whole. It is by researches and results such as these that man may be said to be raised above his humanity. But the ether of space must be looked to for other functions beyond the transmission of light, and its ad- juncts of calorific and actinic or chemical rays. Science taxes it still further as the possible, though improved, medium for transmitting the forces of gravitation and magnetism through space. We can only conceive the propagation of these forces by intervention of matter. Newton held this explicitly as to gravitation. Every- thing we know of the magnetic or electric element connects this also with matter, and by far more com- plex relations of evolution, conduction, induction, and chemical action. Gravitation, to our present know- ledge, stands alone among the great forces of nature. If it be ever brought into correlation with other powers, I am inclined to beheve that the magnetic element will be the first to come into this conjunction, with the possible intervention of ether as a part of such correla- tion. I incline the more to this speculation from its concurrence with a persuasion I have long held, that if ON MATTER, FORCE, AND MOTION IN SPACE. 57 there be any special material element producing the phenomena of electricity and magnetism, that element will be found in the ether of which we now speak — occupying not solely the regions of space around us, but permeating the grosser forms of matter, and in their conjunction undergoing changes of which electri- city may be one manifestation. All this is pure hypo- thesis at present, and insusceptible of proof ; but that a closer approximation exists among those forces than has been yet discovered, is one of those presumptions well warranted by the whole course of modern en- quiry.^ In any case, however, if gravitation and magnetism be transmitted forces, we cannot well look elsewhere than to ether, provisionally so called, as the mode of transmission. A necessary existence to the explanation of other phenomena, we cannot bring into conjunction with it another occupant of interplanetary space, the properties of which as a medium could be even -more inconceivable, thus blended, than those we assign to ether alone. As regards gravitation, indeed, we have one difficulty to surmount, which if accepting the pre- mises, may well be deemed insuperable. Laplace has concluded from certain considerations that this attractive force must have velocity of transmission some milhon times that of light — an expression which plunges us at once in the gulf of the Infinite, forcing us to regard this wonderful power, acting unceasingly in the uni- * In tBe 6tli and 7tli Definitions of the ' Principia,' Newton especially uses the magnet to illustrate some of the fundamental laws of gravita- tion. 58 ON MATTER, FOECE, AND MOTION IN SPACE. verse, on suns and atoms of matter, as a solitary mys- tery, unapproachable by the reason of man. Yet, if transmitted at all, some medium must be concerned in the transmission ; and we may best invoke the aid of that which brings to us the hght of sun and stars, and interpenetrates all matter around us. The problem is a sublime one, whether ever to be solved or not. Eesearch has been so largely given to the pheno- mena of magnetism, that some more complete theory might have been expected of its relations to space. But though experiments tell us of lines and curves of mag- netic force, in proximity to the bodies from which it is obtained, we cannot yet carry direct evidence to spaces beyond. Speculation, however, as to magnetic con- nexions of the sun and earth has been sanctioned by various recent observations, which are still in pro- gress. The phenomena observed are in part at least of periodical character, and so blended with terrestrial magnetism, that time and a very copious average of observations are required to sift and verify the results. Assuming, however, the bare fact of electric relations existing between distant bodies in space — and the as- sumption is fairly warranted — and knowing this element to have mensurable motions in time, closely akin to those of light, we are again brought to our hypo- thetical ether as the medium of transmission — adding thereby to the complexity of its functions, yet em- barrassing the reason less than would the hypothesis of another agent of transmission. It is a grand conception, or rather conclusion, of modern science, which thus makes ether — an ON MATTER, FORCE, AND MOTION IN SPACE. 59 exquisitely subtle material medium — the occupant of space throughout the universe. The unprofitable ques- tions oi ponderable and imponderable are put aside by the conviction that such medium is necessary to the existence of recognised phenomena. But of the inter- planetary spaces, those with which we have most con- cern, ether is not the sole occupant. Eecent observa- tions, eveiy day augmenting upon us, show the presence of matter in motion, under different forms of aggrega- tion, in these interspaces ; subject doubtless to the general laws which govern the planets and satellites, but with special anomalies not yet fully explored. The various phenomena of meteors, some of them seemingly connected with rings of nebulous matter having peri- odical revolutions round the sun — comets, zodiacal light, aerolites, &c. — all attest the large presence of matter in this ethereal domain ; the residue, it may be, of those successive condensations from which we sup- pose the different bodies of the solar system to have derived their several forms and place in the heavens. Such intervening material elements, we have much pre- sent reason to believe, do not differ greatly from those familiar to us on earth. But whatever their nature, they doubtless have definite physical relations to the medium in which they move. The phenomena of cer- tain comets afford evidence of this, while at the same time furnishing argument for the existence of the medium itself. We have hitherto been regarding chiefly what may be termed the ether of outer-space. Every difficulty is augmented when we regard it in closer connexion GO ON MATTER, FORCE, AND MOTION IN SPACE. with terrestrial matter. Look at all we have to con- ceive when these complex ethereal pulses reach the region of our atmosphere. Three gases, besides aque- ous vapour in ever-varying degree of condensation and change, become blended with them in the self-same space, under what physical relations no philosophy can tell. Nearer to the earth other matters, organic or mineral, are variously diffused through the atmosphere ; and the atmospheric vibrations ministering to sound become commingled with the undulations conveying light to heat ; each system of waves, under their several velocities, amplitudes and refrangibilities, mov- ing in the same portion of space — not indeed without conflict, as shown in the various modifications of the calorific and actinic rays, as well as of the lines of the visible spectrum — but still under laws, seen or unseen, which limit disturbance and control the whole. Con- ception labours in vain to follow these infinitesimal functions of matter and force. And the difficulty is en- hanced by the conclusion pressed cogently upon us that the great agent under our review, the ether of space, exists in and permeates the most solid bodies of which we have knowledge — a medium or agent in those in- testine molecular changes which, in one condition of action or another, form the subject and foundation of all physical science. Our knowledge of the infinitesi- mal divisibility of matter helps us to the conception of ether pervading it no farther than by the analogy of another great natural fact, closely related, equally inconceivable, yet proved to be true. This topic, how- ever, does not now come before us. ON MATTER, FORCE, AND MOTION IN SPACE. 61 Looking to the whole subject just discussed, we are forced to admit, notwithstanding all the genius and labour given to it, that the ultimate truths it involves are still wanting to us. Our reason here lies very- much at the mercy of language. We have got hold of certain words needed to express the great elements acting in the natural world. Of these strangely-fated terms which we employ to expound the deepest mys- teries of nature, the word Force is the most mysteri- ous — expressing a reahty of action in time and space — present wherever matter and motion are, and known to us but through these — emanating from life and mind as well as inanimate nature — yet strictly speak- ing a name only to our understanding. It is a name, however, betokening relations on which the highest philosophy may fitly employ itself; subject to those restrictions which only the highest philosophy can discern and submit to. It is matter of curious specu- lation whether future research will ever bring us to a clear comprehension of the power or powers we thus denominate — of their relations to matter throughout the universe, and of the connexions they establish be- tween more material, phenomena, and the higher attributes of life, mind, and will. No avenue is yet discernible to this ultimate truth. Fresh analogies may come to light, and new correlations of pheno- mena ; but the question of primary cause still unceas- ingly starts up, ' What is Force in itself ? ' to answer which question truly and intelligibly is hardly, I think, permitted to the present powers of man. 62 DIVISIBILITY OF MATTER,— ATOMIC THEORY. Physical Science, in all its parts, is ever furnishing fresh instances to amaze and bewilder our conceptions on this subject. They tax heavily the belief of com- mon minds, though sustained by evidence irresistible in kind, as compulsory as mathematical demonstration. Examples of the divisibility of matter are now so numerous and familiar that it is needless to dwell upon them ; yet a few may be cited instar multorum, and these derived chiefly from recent researches. Take sodium as indicated by its coloured lines in the spectrum. Calculation, based upon the diffusion of a salt of this metal in a given atmospheric space, shows that 180-millionth part of a grain of sodium may be detected by this subtle analysis. In the sodium salt thus employed other experiments prove the pre- sence of one ten-millionth part of iodine as an ingre- dient. Take aniline as an example from modern chemistry. A single grain gives a rose-pink colour to ten million times its weight of water, by diffusion of the innumerable molecules of aniline of which this grain is composed. In like manner a strong ruby tint is given to a volume of fluid by a quantity of gold not exceeding ^^-jV^^ part by weight. DIVISIBILITY OF MATTER — ATOMIC THEORY. 63 Matter, organised into life, furnishes illustrations without end. The living and fossil infusoria — the ova of fishes and insects — the red corpuscles of the blood (estimated microscopically by bilhons to the cubic inch) — the odours of flowers — the millions of germs diffused from the puiF-ball of a single fungus — these suffice for examples, expressing in their units the marvellous divisibihty of matter; and a further marvel in the consideration that these units are themselves organised compounds of smaller and more elementary atoms, each endowed with properties giving it a part in the mechanism of the natural world. In no case have we absolute proof that the ultimate atoms or monads — the fjLsysSr^ ahaipsTOL — have been reached. In the case of compound bodies, their molecules by division carry us yet farther in the scale of minuteness, until thought becomes involved in that metaphysical web of the Infinite and Indivisible — the terminus to all enquiry.^ The admission, or rather re-admission, of the atomic theory into all our views of the material world is per- haps the most marked step in the science of our day. The facts as well as the requirements of chemistry have * Lucretius, wonderful botli as a thinker and poet, approaches this abstruse point of the infinite divisibility of matter with his wonted felicity in subjecting philosophy to verse (^lib. iv. 616). It is one of the many instances where his power of thought (based doubtless in part on prior philosophy) has pointed to conclusions verified more or less by the most recent researches of our own time. Without citing others, I may briefly notice two instances which I have not seen mentioned elsewhere, viz., the passage (lib. ii. 288 et seq.) in which are foreshadowed the recent discoveries of Graham and Tyndall on the diff'usibility and pene- trability of different kinds of matter ; and that (lib. ii. 447-50) indi- cating the exact order in which stone, bronze, and iron implements are now shown to have come into the uses of man. 64 DIVISIBILITY OF MATTER — ATOMIC THEORY. had the largest share in this act of progress ; though the general conception is one which might well be derived from observation of the diversities of matter, and of those endless changes and interchanges which can only be effected by particles of infinite smallness. The microscope, too, though far short of its present perfection, had already disclosed organisms so minute, yet so perfect in their several forms, as to suggest at once an elaboration from atoms — the a[j,ipri re aXap^/o-ra of matter. But the doctrine of Definite Proportion in chemical compounds, well established, made that of atoms a direct necessity ; and the principles embodied in this doctrine have derived from the genius and labours of chemists a certain mathematical character even in the formulae used for their expression. A period of little more than sixty years, dating from the first rude outline of Dalton, comprises all these signal discoveries — best expounded by terms which denote their dependence on the properties and relations of atoms, such as isomerism, isomorphism, allotropy, substitution, types, homologous series, atomic weights, &c. These terms may hereafter merge in others more general ; but meanwhile they are needed to express phenomena forming that great body of connected science which under the name of Chemistry (a name of feeble origin for what it now denotes) deals with the infinitesimal parts of matter in all its forms — with their mutual actions and affinities, and their connexions with those great natural forces, light, heat, electricity, &c., which call these relations into activity. Forces act upon matter by changing in one way or other the DIVISIBILITY OF MATTER — ^ATOMIC THEORY. 65 inter-relations of its component atoms. These atomic changes are such in kind as to show the individuality of the parts so-called, however inconceivable their minuteness. To this individuahty are attached some of the most profound questions in modern science. First comes the old metaphysical difficulty. Is there any thing actually indivisible ? Can we speak of, or conceive, a material unit without parts ? Eemitting this ques- tion, as may well be done, to that Umbo of the Infinite in which so many others are merged, we encounter various problems more capable of solution, but not yet thoroughly solved. What, for example, are those properties or endowments, manifestly inherent in the very nature of the ultimate fractional parts of matter, giving them their affinities, repulsions, &c. inter se, and in their relation to the forces which put them into action ? Are there absolute intrinsic differences in the nature of atoms or monads, corresponding to our re- ceived catalogue of elementary bodies ? Or must we receive the latter as an approximation merely to fewer and simpler elements, to be determined as such by a future more subtle analysis ? How are we to regard the phenomena of allotropy occurring in substances hitherto deemed elementary ? Or the atomic pheno- mena of crystallisation and their various relations to light, heat, and electricity ? Or the strange fact, necessarily blending itself with the atomic theory, that the properties of substances may in many cases be dis- tinctly altered by admixture with infinitesimal propor- F 66 DIVISIBILITY OF MATTER — ATOMIC THEORY. tions of other matter, sometimes not exceeding a millionth part of their weight ? ^ Nor are questions of this kind limited to what we may regard as simple atoms. They apply ahke to those endless atomic compounds, of the same or differ- ent kinds of matter which make up the natural world around us. These compound atoms, now distinctively termed molecules^ we may assume to be larger and of less simple figure than the atoms composing them, though this conclusion is one rather of inference than of experimental knowledge. Appreciation by mea- surement, or other direct means, of these infinitesimal parts is as impossible as to conceive them by efibrt of thought. There are, indeed, some recent experiments (made by subjecting simple and compound gases re- spectively to equal increments of heat and pressure) which tend to show that all gases, under similar con- ditions, contain equal numbers, and therefore equal sizes, of constituent atoms or molecules. But this is one of the many questions alluded to as awaiting solution. The glory of chemistry as a science depends espe- cially upon its researches into molecular properties and combinations. The endless number and variety of chemical compounds, their tendency to types and de- terminate series, and the mastery now obtained over them by synthesis as well as analysis, show how vast ' Sir W. Thomson (1870) assigns four physical proofs of limits to the smallness of atoms and molecules — one derived from the contact and electricity of metals, the others from the doctrine of capillary attraction and the kinetic theory of gases, giving the certainty that there is a limit to the molecular size, however exceeding all conception in minuteness. DIVISIBILITY OF MATTER— ATOMIC THEORY. 67 are the problems the atomic theory brings before us, and how bold and successful have been the steps of science in this direction. The conception, perhaps the proof, of the class of bodies termed Compound Eadicals marks one of these steps, useful in progress if not certain in sequel. It illustrates, indeed, as an example, the present aspect of chemistry as regards organic compounds — a redundance of curious and well-deter- mined facts, awaiting some certain principle of corre- lation and nomenclature to give them that cohesion which the ultimate ends of science require. Unity is the true Euthanasia of the several chemical systems now existing among us. Dismissing for the moment these more general views, we come back upon the question, already pro- pounded, as to the intimate nature of atoms, and the properties which may be predicated as belonging to them, irrespectively even of differences in the nature of matter itself.^ I have hitherto spoken chiefly of their infinitesimal minuteness. Every speculation as to their nature, every fact or theory regarding their mutual relations, includes, and must include, this pos- tulate. No explanation of the most common pheno- mena is possible without it. Those intestine actions and changes which take place within the most solid bodies, inscrutable to any mode of observation, can be effected only through infinitesimal minuteness of the parts composing them. Necessity here becomes the ^ Nowhere is the question of the necessary attributes of indivisible atoms, as well as that of the infinite divisibility of space, reasoned out more profoundly than in the writings of Pascal. ]?2 68 DIVISIBILITY OF MATTER— ATOMIC THEORY. measure of minuteness — the sole measure we have ; fo the instances already given, and the many that might be added, marvellous though they are, do not make it certain that we have reached what is ultimate in the atomic scale. If we come to ether, as a mate- rial medium, occupying universal space, we are forced for the fulfilment of its offices, from actual pheno- mena, to assume a degree of divisibility of matter which no statement can convey to our conception. The exquisite mobility of atoms is another condition, equally necessary and collateral, indeed, to that just stated. It is a condition expressed not solely through motions and changes obvious to sense, or such as occur in fluid or gaseous states of matter, but with equal cer- tainty through the changes produced in the densest bodies by the various action of light, heat and electricity, &c. — atomic motions real in themselves, however produced. When we speak of telegraphic communication, next to instantaneous, between Lon- don and Edinburgh or across the Atlantic, we denote the assured fact that every single atom of the inter- vening metallic wire has undergone for the moment some specific change, whatever it be, in this wonderful transmission of force. A figure solid — a crystal, for example — may be wholly altered in its internal or atomic structure, without any appreciable change of outward form. The proof of such intestine motions of atoms is as perfect as if the eye could discern them. The microscope discloses many marvellous facts in this direction of research, but there is a microcosm of movement and change which lies far beyond its reach. DIVISIBILITY OF MATTER — ATOMIC THEORY. 69 The experiments of Karsten and Grove in fixing on a plate of glass the image of a coin simply laid upon it and electrified, shows, as do the phenomena in photo- graphy, the exquisitely minute changes which molecules undergo in ways utterly inappreciable by human sense or conception. In subjects of this kind one question follows another by instant suggestion. It may be, and has been asked, is matter in any of its forms, from the in- visible atom to the great globes of heaven, ever really at rest ? Is not mobihty, as an inherent property and function of matter, actually expressed by the unceasing motion of its parts, whatever their mode of aggrega- tion ? xVstronomy would seem to answer in the affirm- ative for all that belongs to its vast domain. Organic life, in its every shape on earth, tells the same story of unceasing motion and change in the atomic elements on which fife depends. Inorganic substances do not afford the same direct evidence. Yet if that be, as now commonly supposed, a simple induced condition of atomic motions in bodies, such motion, in one degree or other, must ever be present in all matter, altered more or less whenever bodies of unequal temperature come into proximity. The doctrine of latent heat some- what obscures this conception ; but the doctrine and phrase are provisional only for the expression of a very obscure physical fact. In gases more especially we obtain strong presumption of incessant movement in the atoms composing them. Eecent researches on their interdiffiision and subjection to pressure go far to justify this behef — one subject, however, to those ele- 70 DIVISIBILITY OF MATTER — ATOMIC THEORY. mentary difficulties, which here, as so often elsewhere, stand stubbornly in our way. The word Motion itself is one of these. No conception of it can be formed which does not include relation to something else than the atom, or aggregate of atoms, moved — a relation so complex as regards the matter of forces in action, that all conclusions must be accepted with reserve. If we suppose compound forces acting in this invisible world of monads — and the condition is a very ad- missible one — rotatory motions would be the probable result ; and such hypothesis is, in truth, more appli- cable than any other. Leaving this speculation, we come again to what may be regarded as the integral or necessary proper- ties of ultimate atoms. To those of infinite minuteness and inobiHty may further be added that of definite figure — a postulate almost essential to any interpreta- tion we can put upon them as components of matter — the only key to the phenomena of definite proportions, isomorphism, substitution, and all besides which consti- tutes chemical science. It is impossible to suppose that atoms, shapeless and indeterminate in figure, can be instrumental in changes and combinations deter- minate as mathematical facts. Adaptations so perfect and constant can only co-exist with primitive forms equally perfect and permanent. But admitting these premises, what system of atomic morphology can be constructed to meet the conditions of the problem? More than sixty kinds of matter are still elementary to our knowledge. Are we to suppose different configura- tion of the component atoms of each of these, and of DIVISIBILITY OF MATTER ATOMIC THEORY. 71 others that may yet be discovered ? Or, in sight of this difficulty, may we presume that many of the number are really compounds of simpler elements, though possibly beyond the reach of discovery as such? or alio tropic conditions of the same element, as Dumas conjectures regarding chlorine, iodine, and bromine ? The whole question enters so deeply into the theory of the material world, that we are bound to follow it as far as reason and analogy will carry us, awaiting those future disclosures which time is sure to afford. That they will contract the catalogue of elements, up to this time constantly increased in number, is my confident belief. Seeking aid to this enquiry from other parts of science, Crystallography is perhaps that most fertile of suggestion. It deals with determinate figures, created by the mutual actions of atomic parts, the simple atom or the compounded molecule. This atomicity — to use a recent term — in the structure of crystals is expressed not only in their modes of aggregation, but also in their optical axes and other relations to light ; and further, in those internal changes of structure, already noticed, which occur without change of outward form, and those more special cases where the primitive form of the crystal determines its mode of change when sub- jected to heat. Other instances might be given, justi- fying the notion of definite figure of atoms from the analogy of crystalline accretions. If we have mathe- matical forms of crystals, we may fairly presume such to exist in the ultimate atoms composing them. If we can reduce the primitive forms to three only, the same 72 DITISIBILITY OF MATTER — ATOMIC THEORY. assumption may be applied to atoms. Or, if we go further and consider, with WoUaston and Mitscherhch, all the forms of crystallisation as explicable by the opposition of simple spheres or spheroids with an inter- vening elastic or compressible medium, whatever its nature, we come more closely to the elements of an atomic theory, and to a view more plausible perhaps than any yet propounded, of this part of the nature of primitive atoms. With every aid, however, of analogy and hypo- thesis, we cannot yet go further in the solution of a problem complicated by the different kinds of matter itself. Eecurring, however, to the more general view of the properties of atoms, some things still remain to be noticed. In admitting their fixedness of figure we necessarily deprive them of individual elasticity. This property in its various degrees can only depend on the manner in which atoms are amalgamated or grouped together in mass — a condition which may be said to determine generally their relation to impulses from without, and their mobility as one of the most impor- tant of these. It is not too much to conceive this property' — the capacity and velocity of motion — as being very different for atoms of different kinds, or for atoms of the same kind differently aggregated. Eecent researches on gases and vapours afford fair sanction to hypothesis on this subject. The gaseous form of matter is that which indeed aids more especially in the enquiry, giving their most active and mobile condition to its atomic parts, through the interpenetration of those forces by which this wonderful machinery of DIVISIBILITY OF MATTER — ATOMIC THEORY. 73 atoms or molecules is put into work. The evidence that under equal pressure and temperature every different gas contains in the same volume the same number of molecules, is one striking result of research thus directed. The experiments of Graham on the inter- diffusion of gases and liquids have thrown much curious light on the subject, and coupled with other consider- ations go far to justify the hypothesis, propounded by himself, that the atoms or molecules of all gases are spherical in form, incessantly in movement in every direction, but with varying velocity in different gases. Granting this to be hypothetical only, yet are the con- ditions resulting from experiment such as to make it difficult to supply other interpretation. We feel in a certain proximity to the truth, though the conclusive and final steps still remain to be made. Similar antici- pations are frequent in other parts of science, cheering as well as directing the labours of research. To gases and vapours, as already mentioned, we may especially look for elucidation of the forms and properties of molecular compounds, founded on their varying relation to those radiant forces (as we must conventionally call them) which govern the intimate motions of matter in all its shapes. The strong pre- sumption already existing that compound atoms, or molecules, must differ from simple atoms in size, or figure, or both, has been strikingly confirmed by the experiments of Tyndall, showing the large absorption, or stoppage, of radiant heat occurring in its passage through compound gases, compared with what happens in those of simple elementary kind. These results, hke 74 DIVISIBILITY OF MATTER — ATOMIC THEORY. those derived from his later discovery of the chemical reactions produced by light passing through compound gases, concur with Mr. Graham's various researches in pointing at a molecular mechanism^ a definite principle of embodiment of atomic figures, forces, and motions, destined hereafter to become a special department of science — closely allied, however, to chemistry by those principles of analysis, synthesis, substitution, &c. which have so marvellously inter- preted to us the intimate constitution of all compound bodies. Chemists are still not agreed as to the best mode of tabulating or symbohsing the results which enrich this part of their science. Of the schemes pro- pounded (and four are now on the table before me) each has its appropriate value. And in this very fact we find evidence that they are but provisional, and steps towards some perfect system even now looming be- fore us and well-nigh certain of attainment. Founded as it must be on strict numerical proportions, it will probably disclose or suggest relations of atomic figure also, as exponents of the combinations and changes matter undergoes when thus reduced to the infinitesi- mal parts in which all material action really resides. The future progress of this enquiry will doubtless elucidate more completely the physical distinctions of elementary atoms and molecules, both as to their nature and effects in action. The present theoretical distinc- tion is that best expressed by Wurtz in the words given in the subjoined note.^ This definition shows, what * L'atome est la plus petite quantite d'un Element qui puisse exister dans un corps compost, corame indivisible par des forces chimiques. DIVISIBILITY OF MATTER — ATOMIC THEORY. 75 indeed was already recognised, how much of future knowledge, not merely as respects particular facts, but general laws, is wrapped up in this molecular theory. It is through the infinitely small that we may best reach a comprehension of the architecture, organic and inorganic, of the material world. Without discussing in -detail the several bearings of molecular philosophy, I may notice one cardinal point important from its relation to others, viz., the fact that in proportion as a compound is more complex in its parts it becomes more unstable, more liable to dissolution. All the most explosive compounds of which we have knowledge come under this general law. So, it may be — though here we must speak more doubtfully — do those strange phenomena of ferments, of animal and vegetable poisons, and of the specific poisons of certain epidemic diseases. In the latter class of facts we have the most striking proofs of the infinite divisibility of matter, and of those wonderful relations of its infinitesimal parts which, by a slight change in their proportion only, can convert an inno- cuous substance — even an article of food — into one which becomes an instant cause of disease or death. Physiology, as a part of general science, has much yet to learn here, though it may probably never be able to tell us in what physical changes that immunity con- sists, which renders a person who has once had the smallpox permanently insusceptible of infection from the virus of this disease. La molecule est im groupe d'atoraes, forraant la plus petite quantite d'un corps simple ou compose qui puisse exister a Fetat libre, entrer dans un reaction, ou en sortir. 76 DIVISIBILITY OF MATTER — ATOMIC THEORY. In treating thus far of the divisibihty of matter, and of the atomic theory as resultant from it, I have said but Httle of those imponderable agents which we can in no way dissociate from matter, and cannot easily define otherwise than as functions of it, yet which severally involve atomic actions and conditions peculiar to each. Light and heat come perhaps in closest relation, as connected with these conditions ; and the discovery of a constant proportion between the specific heat of bodies and the atomic weight of their particles is one of the exponents of relations which may well be called very profound, seeing how far they go beyond the region of the senses or the bare conjectures of thought. How important, again, in its connexion with the atomic theory is the curious fact (established as far as experiment has yet gone) that the power or index of refraction of light in compound bodies is the sum of the indexes of refi:action of their component parts. We may further fairly presume (and this is confirmed by Tyndall's later researches) that the undulations of light — the ' luminous waves of ether' — have definite relation to the atomic con- ditions of the bodies they permeate. If simple light can unite with sudden explosion the atoms of hy- drogen and chlorine, we may well anticipate its action in other cases in dissociating the molecules of com- pound bodies, and with some relation, it may be, to those differences in luminous waves on which the differences of refrangibility depend. Of electricity, under its various forms, as one of these great agents in the world of nature, it may be said that atoms in DIVISIBILITY OF MATTER — ATOMIC THEORY. 77 motion either constitute this power, or are pervaded by and give conduction and other action to it. With the view I entertain of the relation of electricity to the ether of space — of which I shall speak more in another paper — I think the latter the more probable interpre- tation. The phenomena of electricity in vacuum-tubes show the exquisite tenuity to which air and other vapours must be reduced before they cease to give passage to the electric current. Of gravitation in its connexion with the atomic theory I have spoken in another of these papers. We may describe it as a property inherent in all matter, but such phrase adds nothing real to our knowledge of this great force, gives no conception of its origin in individual atoms, of the aggregation of units of force, or of its transmission through space. The relation of the ponderable to the imponderable, of matter to the powers acting upon it, forms indeed that mysterious volume which science has opened, but has not yet been able adequately to decipher. Although the doctrine of atoms was a mere specu- lation in ancient philosophy, yet, even as such, it is worth noting how far human thought, working by itself, advanced towards those conclusions which have become the recognised truths of our own day. With- out recurring to the doctrines, so often quoted, of Anaxagoras, Democritus, Epicurus, &c., or to the great poem of Lucretius which gives so magnificent a frame- work to all atomic speculations, it is enough to say that we find pervading the most remote philosophical antiquity a general notion of indivisible, indestructible 78 DIVISIBILITY OF MATTER —ATOMIC THEORY- atoms — the material of all creation, either by inherent energy of their own, or acted upon by a creative power from without. It cannot be said that any im- portant advance has been made upon these views until approaching closely to our own time ; though the great names of Bacon and Newton enter into the dis- cussion, the former expanding and extolling the doc- trine of Democritus on the subject ; the latter, in one of his wonted pregnant sentences, denoting those quali- ties of ultimate atoms which he deems essential to the uses for which God created them. The monads of Leibnitz and the living organic molecules are little more than variations of the same ancient theme — naked hypotheses, without any show of verification by facts. The doctrine of Boscovich regarding the attractions and repulsions of matter as associated with mathema- tical points, or centres of force, is better worthy of note, not solely to our present purpose, but as one of those large views which concentrate around them nu- merous facts otherwise insulated or anomalous. The atomic theory of gravitation of Le Sage, and that more recently propounded by Mosotti, belong to the history of this enquiry, but have done little to advance its progress. It is, indeed, as already stated, to the chemical dis- coveries of the last half-century that we owe what may now be fairly called Atomic Science. Studied through the multiplicity, yet mathematical fixedness, of their combinations, atoms and molecules, though unseen as such, have become intellectually realities to our know- ledge — first by analysis, and more recently by syn- DIVISIBILl'lT OF MATTER — ATOMIC THEORY. 79 thesis. Chemists are tracing and following them in their most secret operations ; and the latter method has lately obtained a signal success in producing or- ganic compounds from those simple elements the in- cipient combinations of which had heretofore been wholly hidden from us. It is hard to say how far this success may hereafter be carried, but it is certain that the halting-place has not yet been reached. We are still ignorant — and here there is no obvious path to discovery — of the actual intimate structure of mole- cules. The proportion of number and weight of the atoms comprising them we can tell, but not the man- ner in which they are built up into those definite forms, so numerous to our knowledge, in theory next to innumerable. We cannot penetrate into the atomic attractions and repulsions which govern these pheno- mena, or prove the exact relation of such atomic pro- perties to the great natural forces in constant action around us. We use the general term polarity^ and Dr. Prout and others have sought to give it a more specific application to atomic theory ; but all such views, however plausible, are still without proof, nor in any case do they yet meet all the conditions of the question. In addition to those already cited I might name many other problems in science which can only be approached through the atomic theory. Such are the phenomena of catalysis — the greater energy of certain elements, as oxygen and hydrogen, at the moment of their evolution from compounds — the questions regard- ing ozone and other allotropic elements — the efiects of 80 DIVISIBILITY OF MATTER — ATOMIC THEORY. electricity on the surface-molecules of bodies, as shown in the experiments of Grove and Karsten — the curious facts described by Prout under the name of Steror- ganisation — the conditions (denoted by Hoffman under the terms univalent, bivalent, &c.) which decide the different combining powers of chemical elements, &c. All such problems are closely blended with others of like import ; and the progress of enquiry is ever multi- plying these connexions, and making them subserve to mutual illustration and ulterior discovery. 81 THE ELECTRIC ELEMENT 1867. Electrical Science, in its present state, curiously shows how far the knowledge of phenomena may go, without knowledge of the true nature of the agent producing them. The first letters are wanting to the alphabet of the science. We speak of positive and negative electricity, of poles and currents, of induction, of quantity and intensity, but we conceive and define these conditions solely by their effects. Other pheno- mena and names come in, denoting the magnetic aspects of the electric element, but still failing to in- terpret to us the nature of that power which gives origin to the whole. This elementary ignorance^ com- mon to many parts of science, is more striking here from the wonderful command obtained over the elec- tric force in its various modes of evolution, concentra- tion, conduction, and application to the uses of man. We make what we needfully call its current, a mes- senger swift as light itself, to the most distant parts of the earth — create, check, suspend, and re-create this current as fast as human fingers can move— and from either end of the electric cable, lying in the depths of the Atlantic, can detect the exact place of a fault in the wires a thousand miles from land ! But with all this mastery over the agent, we are 82 THE ELECTKIC ELEMENT. checked at once by the question, ' What is it ? What is electricity ? ' The problem is one beset with difficul- ties, but with seductions also ; seeing the likelihood that hereafter some conclusion will be reached closer than any yet attained. I have long interested myself in the speculation; and with a growing persuasion that if there be any distinct material element con- cerned in, and producing, electric phenomena, the ether, pervading all known space, is that best satisfy- ing the conditions required. The assumption may seem a rash one, seeing the vastness and complexity of these phenomena, and the want of any direct evidence to justify what is assumed. But it must be kept in mind that no other physical theory has been brought to solve the problem, or tell us what electricity really is. If anyone had title to utter an opinion on this point it was Faraday. He declares that ' of the intimate nature of electricity we know nothing ; whether it is matter, force, vibration, or what.' His description of it as ' an axis of power i having contrary and equal forces in opposite directions,' denotes particular phenomena, but not the power pro- ducing them. In addressing myself to this question. I would first seek to simplify it by limitation. Electric action, how- ever manifested, must be either a special condition of motion of the atoms of sensible matter, as we suppose in the case of heat, or it must be due to some indi- vidual element or agent, distinct from the matter, on which and through which it acts, an agent we must denote as itself material^ seeing that we can in no way THE ELECTRIC ELEMENT. 83 describe, or even conceive, tlie phenomena apart from this relation to a material cause. I cannot hesitate in believing the latter view to be that best warranted by our present knowledge. The methods by which we elicit, accumulate, and conduct electricity, whatever theoretic difficulties they involve, are far better understood under the hypothesis of a special material agent, than as proceeding solely from atomic actions of the bodies electrically affected. To speak of polar states, or chemical changes in the atoms of matter, as constituting electricity, is but to hide the real difficulty, leaving unsolved the cause whence these conditions are mtrinsically derived. The pheno- mena attending the transmission of electricity through wires bear cogently on the question. The differences of effect produced by the varying material, length, and thickness of the conductor can hardly be reconciled with other views than that of a specific agent acting in a certain ratio to its quantity and concentration, and capable of being estimated under these relations. These terms of quantity^ intensity^ and concentration within determinate spaces especially characterise electricity, and associate it intimately with those actions and condi- tions by which material elements are designated to our knowledge. If the individuality of the electric element be ad- mitted as distinct from the matter through which it acts, the question at once arises, can we identify it with any other known element in the natural world ? As postulates in the enquiry we need, first, some agent cosmical in character, since our actual knowledge of G 2 84 THE ELECTKIC ELEMENT. electricity, especially under its magnetic conditions, shows it to be an influence spreading widely over the universe, and connecting us physically witli the sun at least, if not with other more distant worlds. We need also some element capable of expounding those rela- tions of electricity to matter of every kind, so intimate and constant that no changes of substance whatsoever, chemical or mechanical, can occur without electric manifestations in some form or degree ; and no sub- stance, as far as w^e can see, but is acted upon in some way or other by the electricity thus evolved. This universality of relation led Faraday to conjecture a direct connexion between the force of gravitation and the electric power. But he failed to find any experi- mental proof justifying this hypothesis. Had such proof been attainable, he of all philosophers would have been the most likely to reach it. But failing in this, is there no other known agent to satisfy, in part at least, the conditions required ? Be- fore hurrying to the theory of a new and special power (a bare assumption, complicating yet more the great problem of the elementary forces) we are bound to see whether any of the elements already recognised in the natural world will not equally well interpret the phenomena. And this, I think, may fairly be affirmed of that element, so to term it, which under the provi- sional name of ether we recognise as a necessary existence in the universe around us— necessary/, be- cause we can in no other way explain the transmission through space of those wonderful wave-motions, of which light and heat are the chief exponents to our THE ELECTRIC ELEMENT. 85 living world. Though forced to use the term im- ponderable for this element, yet does its function need- fully imply the material nature of the medium, as well as its diffusion throughout every part of the solar system, and even through those other systems of worlds which send their light to us from the. depths of space. It is a cosmical element in the largest sense of the word ; not merely diffused through the universe around us, but interpenetrating, as optical and other phenomena attest, even the densest bodies of our material world. Vast and complex though the recognised function of ether be, need we or can we suppose it the sole one which this element fulfils in nature ? Admitting in the outset its materiality, may it not, or must it noi, when coming into contact and interpenetration with the atmosphere and still grosser and more palpable forms of matter, assume other conditions and properties than when diffused equably and continuously through outer space—be condensed, accumulated, evolved, con- ducted in currents, and otherwise modified by the kind of matter it pervades, and by the changes matter itself undergoes from other forces acting upon it ? Say that these questions are vague and lead to presumptions only. But presumptions may fairly be made an integral part of science in cases where cer- tainty is unattainable or has not yet been attained. They are steps to rest upon, if not to aid in rising higher. In the case before us the general presumption is one that almost compels assent. An exquisitely subtle agent, such as we must presume ether to be, cannot be supposed to impinge upon, interpenetrate. 86 THE ELECTRIC ELEMENT. and occupy the various forms of sensible matter without involving relations and actions, equally subtle, between this element and the atoms or molecules of which matter is composed. We cannot conceive changes of any kind in the latter without some equivalent change or manifestation in the former. Without assuming to indicate what may be cause and what effect, in these infinitesimal actions, we may at least deem it next to certain that the agency of ether cannot be limited to the phenomena expressed by light and heat only ; or that its elasticity, velocity of wave-motion, and other properties remain unaltered when coming into that close atomic coalescence which all analogy tells us to be the condition of most energetic physical action. If, failing to bring direct proof of the presence and action of ether in these subtle phenomena, the question suggests itself, have we not its substitute and repre- sentative in electricity — in those wonderful phenomena, evolved and apparent to our tests, even in the most minute atomic changes, and capable both by natural and artificial means (but always in connexion with atomic disturbance) of being raised to a high degree of intensity and quantitative power ? What is there, in short, to forbid the conception that electricity is the ether itself.^ — not existing as in its more equable diffusion through interplanetary and stellar space, but from its embodiment in terrestrial matter, solid, fluid, and gaseous, quickened into new conditions, acting or acted upon in all atomic changes, and in certain of these extricated in such quantity and manner as to become a powerful and prolific agent in the hands of THE ELECTRIC ELEMENT. 8t men ? Can an element such as we must suppose ether to be He dormant in the innermost interstices of matter, while the smallest change of condition, even the simple opposition of different bodies, awakens another power within them into life and energy ? Is it probable, or possible, that two distinct elements should co-exist in the same space, with separate rela- tions to the matter thus closely environing them? Allowing much for our ignorance of matter in its infinitesimal parts, can we suppose two agents thus energetic pervading these parts, yet independent in nature and action ? I put these points interrogatively; but they are surely such as may well sanction hypo- thesis in default of any more absolute answer to the question, ' What is Electricity ? ' For, in truth, no theory yet propounded can go further to satisfy the very difficult conditions of the problem. Look cursorily at the phenomena which this wonderful element of electricity brings before us — its various modes of evolution, including that by induc- tion — its opposed conditions of positive and negative electricity — its manner and velocity of conduction — its connexion with magnetic phenomena in all their aspects — its presence, either as cause or effect, in all that we term chemical action — its relation to vital functions — -its agency in all meteorological changes— and its connexion by exact equivalents of power with the other great forces of the natural world. These various phenomena concentrate themselves under the same single question, ' What is Electricity ? ' Science, as we see, has hitherto given no certain 88 THE ELECTRIC ELEMENT. answer. Though presuming that some single ele- mentary agent is concerned, and this material in its nature, yet can we bring no absolute proof of its being so, or conceive those material properties through which it fulfils the several conditions just stated. What we have before us, then, is purely a question of presump- tion and probability. No other and higher proba- bility can be produced" to refute the opinion that the ether of space, under the conceptions we necessarily attach to it, comes nearer to satisfy these conditions than any other known agent, or any new element which can be imagined for their fulfilment. Though the hypothesis is barren of direct evidence, there are yet glimpses of hght in this direction, giving guidance, it may be, towards another of those unities which it is the special object of science to attain. A wrong theory is often the parent of a right one. In weighing the one before us it must be expHcitly repeated that we are not called upon to vindicate it as apphed to all the details of electric phenomena, where every other has failed to compass their interpretation. The problem of the two electricities and their polarities, under the well-recognised fact that one kind of elec- tricity is never present without evolving an equivalent of the other, is perhaps the most arduous of these, departing from all recognised properties of other powers, and still a barrier even to the boldest conjec- ture. But there is nothing here to contradict the view of ether as the agent concerned in these subtle phe- nomena ; nothing certainly to establish the claim of any other element. The difficulty being equal and THE ELECTRIC ELEMENT. 89 alike under any hypothesis, may fairly be eliminated from the argument. And the same may be said generally of all the problems which electricity puts before us. I have only cursorily alluded to those wonderful magnetic relations of electricity which almost embody a science in themselves. But they present no fresh difficulties to our hypothesis. On the contrary, all the phenomena of magnetism and diamagnetism, of magno- crystalhc action, of magnetic lines of force, and of the direct action of the magnet on electric currents, testify their dependence on an agent pervading matter throughout its ultimate atoms, giving polarity to masses by polarising particles, and variously modi- fied in its action and mode of evolution by the kind of matter it permeates. This is a point to which our regards may more especially be directed, since all recent enquiry tends to prove that the motions and relations of the ultimate atoms of matter depend upon, and are governed by, the polarities of these atoms. The phenomena of crystallisation, and even those of the lightest gases, hardly admit of other interpretation. Electricity, so strikingly manifested in its polar con- ditions, however evolved or applied, comes into instant and almost certain relation with these infinitesimal atomic actions. And this forces us again upon the question. Can we suppose these wonderful actions ever going on in the intimate recesses, and among the StaCpeTa craj/xara of matter, independently of another agent (itself material, from the very definition of its functions), pervading and acting in this very domain ? 90 THE ELECTKIC ELEME^^T. To suppose some agent other than the ether of space fulfilling these conditions, is simply to invent a new name, giving no new or deeper insight into the pro- found problems which this part of science involves. And here I may state my belief that any advance- ment of our knowledge in this matter will probably come from experiment on these inter-relations of elec- tricity and magnetism — such researches, in fact, as have already engaged the genius of Faraday, Be la Eive, Tyndall, Weber, Pliicker, &c. The polarities of mag- netism, the positive and negative electricity, and the relations of these severally to the kinds and forms of matter in which they are embodied, and to the light and heat so variously present in these phenomena, offer still a wide field to the experimental philosopher. Happy he who, working amidst this intricate network of curious but insulated facts, shall discover the clue connecting and giving unity to the whole ! As respects the relations of ether to such eventual discovery, though it be impossible, perhaps, to bring the element, so termed, within the scope of direct ex- periment, yet its admitted and even necessary proper- ties of exquisite tenuity and elasticity eminently fit it, as far as we can see, for undergoing those changes of form and force and direction which are known to us in electric phenomena. Newton, in his discourse on light and colours, explicitly denotes his belief that ether is altered in density and other properties when brought into penetration of grosser matter. And Faraday, con- jecturing that it may be the medium of transmitting the magnetic force, adds that, if there be an ether, ' it is hkely to have other uses than simply the conveyance THE ELECTRIC ELEMENT. 91 of radiations.' Conceptions like these give fair founda- tion to the hypothesis I am seeking to enforce. But this hypothesis justifiably extends to more remote distances in space. If there be, as we have authority for believing, direct magnetic or electrical connexion between the sun and earth, a material medium must exist furnishing this connexion. Why may we not suppose the electric element itself to be this medium, occupying space under the con- ditions we attach to the name of ether, and fulfil- ling by its endowments those wonderful functions in the natural world which we invoke the conception of ether to illustrate and explain ? Why suppose another and distinct element pervading space, when we have one familiar to us in a thousand experiments, so pro- portioned that none other can be conceived equally capable of expounding the phenomena? In the sup- position that ether itself is the electric element thus diffused throughout our solar system — and, upon the theory of light, to stellar space beyond — we obtain presumptions extending to many of the great cosmical problems on which science is now engaged. The velocity of the electric current through certain conductors, in its close approximation to that of the ether waves of light, may fairly be admitted into the argument for identity. All such facts give evidence of the astonishing subtlety and mobility of the element thus propertied, and of its capacity to assume very different physical conditions, especially when brought into con- junction with the more ponderable forms of matter. The meteorological relations of electricity in nowise contradict our hypothesis. That the ethereal medium 92 THE ELECTRIC ELEMENT. has physical and probably complex relations to our atmosphere can hardly be doubted, though, unless under the supposition of its identity with the electric element, we are wholly ignorant of their nature. But this very ignorance becomes itself an argument for identity. I know no theory better fitted to expound the various aspects and conflicts of atmospheric elec- tricity than that I have stated. The interaction of the two circumambient agents, ether and the atmo- sphere, and the connexions of both, but especially of the ether, with the solid matter of the globe, afford relations various and complex enough to meet any theoretical demand. In dealing with this hypothesis it will be seen that I have put all the main points interrogatively, as befits a matter in which there is nothing yet susceptible of proof It is not, however, too much to hope for a time in the future when some higher mastery may be ob- tained over these abstruse problems, and when the great forces that move the material world, including gravitation among them, may be submitted to some more general law, giving unity to phenomena which are incongruous or dissevered to our present knowledge. ^ In a letter to Sir J. Herschel (July 1870), in reply to one from him on this subject, I summarise as follows the purport of the foregoing paper. ^ The hypothesis I have sought in this paper to uphold has found a powerful advocate in M. Savowing, whose excellent memoir, Sur la Fhydque Moderne ('Revue des Deux Mondes,' November and December, 1866), 1 have just peruRed. There are points in his argument which he has put more forcibly than I have done. There are certain points in my statement of the queytion to which he has not adverted. THE ELECTRIC ELEMENT. 93 The phenomena of electricity in their largest scope (and especially those of evolution, conduction, and ac- cumulation) give reason to beheve that a material element is concerned in producing them. Can we conceive other element better fitted to fulfil the conditions required than the ether of space, from its admitted properties as the transmitting medium of light and heat — fi:om its pervading as such all grosser forms of matter — and from the strong presumption that its property may or must be altered by the various conditions of the matter it pervades? This is the outline of the argument. To these points, and to the others dwelt upon in the paper, must be appended the remark, needing to be kept in mind, that however unable upon this hypothesis to solve the most perplexing of problems of electricity and magnet- ism, the same objection exists, in at least equal degree, to the hypothesis of any other special element as con- cerned in these phenomena. Note added m 1873. See Edling's remarkable paper (translated in ' Philo- sophical Magazine,' August 1872, on Electricity as a Function of Ether, indicating this hypothesis (alge- braically as well as otherwise) in its application to the most difficult problems of electricity especially. See also Clarke Maxwell's Lecture at the Royal Institution (February 21, 1873), and the report of it in 'Nature,' February 29, and March 6, 1873, particularly the latter, in relation to Faraday's 'great discovery of the electric magnetic rotation of light.' 94 MENTAL OPERATIONS IN RELATION TO TIME. 1867. Despite the endless treatises on the Mind, its faculties and functions, there are still methods of studying it less regarded than they might be, seeing the curious and instructive analysis they afford. The method I now seek to suggest comes amongst these. It involves no metaphysical theory, and admits of being stated in plain language. Its purport is simply to examine the opera- tions of mind in their relation to time — viewing them as a series or succession of states, rather than as a group of simultaneous conditions. The analysis is not that of the mental faculties in the abstract, but of the modes in which they are severally and successively brought into action, taking time as the test and exponent of their succession. This method of enquiry forms in effect the subject of two chapters in my volume of ' Mental Physiology.' I have there shown how much of striking illustration we can bring to the acts and moods of mind by thus viewing them in their relation of sequence. The con- sciousness of everyone tells of this sequence as a simple fact, and it is implied, if not expressed, in all that has been written on the functions of the senses, on association, memory, and the mental emotions ; but never, as far as I know, distinctly recognised as a MENTAL OPERATIONS IN RELATION TO TIME. 95 method of enquiry. Yet if we may admit that the in- dividual being (das Ich of the Germans) cannot exist in two separate states of perception, thought, feeUng, or voUtion at the same absolute instant of time, we do in fact denote a special mode of analysis, capable of explaining many phenomena — anomahes as well as morbid conditions of mind — which resist all other inter- pretations. However difficult or impossible it may be to dis- sever and distinguish the momentary states, which in their aggregate form our existence, still they are sequent moments — a measiurement of mental time, we might say — were it not that consciousness, even when thus directed, can hardly take account of the rapid and in- cessant changes imposed upon it. There is a certain chronometry, often very exact, in the functions of organic life. We cannot thus describe the fleeting operations of mind — the infinitesimal fiuxions^ we may call them, of thought and feeling. But neither can we reason at all on these acts or states without regarding them as se- quent, and ever displacing one another in that series which gives personal identity to our being. What has been so much written upon under the term of Associa- tion of Ideas might better perhaps have been described as Succession. We cannot well part with the plirase of personal ide7itity^ yet that of personal continuity might perhaps better describe the series of states forming in their aggregate the individual life of man. In the chapters just alluded to I have given various examples of this mode of viewing the mental functions. One or two such I cite here, as illustrative of the argu- 96 MENTAL OPERATIONS IN RELATION TO TIME. ment in hand. An instance familiar to all is that sudden and entire absorption of consciousness by some inward thought, even when the senses are submitted to the strongest impressions from without, as from the loudest swell of a Handel chorus or the rudest noises of a London street, or when fronting the Matterhorn or the Niagara Falls. The physical action on the organs of sense is the same, but the mind is working within itself, and all perception of external objects utterly annulled for a time. But let this cause of distraction be removed, and the mind is suddenly opened to the objects of sense before it, which may themselves again be as suddenly suspended by some new and abstracting thought. Or suppose some strong agitation of the mind, from whatever cause. For the moment it displaces all perception or feeling of other things, but is itself as suddenly obhterated by the in- trusion of other objects of sensation or thought, recur- ring in all its force when these objects are removed. Such alternations of state, repeated again and again more or less rapidly, must be familiar to everyone even commonly observant of his mental relation to the daily incidents of life. In truth the whole of mental life consists in these successive changes, so far interpreted by time that each one may be regarded as having its own identity, however momentary in duration and how- ever linked with antecedents and consequents by what seems an inseparable continuity. I believe, however, that more may be done ana- lytically by taking time as a basis than in any other way. It requires, indeed, that faculty which few can MENTAL OPERATIONS IN RELATION TO THIE. 97 fully or fairly exercise, of turning the mind inwards upon its own operations. Even the most stable mind caimot long maintain this reflex action upon itself with- out confusion and fatigue ; the difference of the power in different individuals involving various diversities of intellect and character which admit no other interpre- tation. But the most closely directed consciousness can only tell generally and vaguely of the rapidity with which successive states of mind press upon one another even in their most ordinary sequence.' As in reason- ing upon the divisibility of matter we use the term of Infinite to cloke our want of comprehension of its ulti- mate analysis, so in regard to mind, the number and rapid succession of its states, whether of thought, emo- tion, or will, make it next to impossible to discover by consciousness the continuity of the series. Who can imravel the sequences even in the most familiar acts of life, as in the thoughts and vohtions which precede and produce speech ? Who can decipher that com- plex and seemingly simultaneous action of mind and bodily organs which enables the musician, from notes before his eye, to execute the most diflicult passages with fingers and voice at once ? Or how must we in- terpret the wonderful yet familiar fact of a man read- ing aloud, line after line, without error or stop, while his thoughts are wandering on some matter wholly alien to the book before him ? ^ M. Comte has strangely denied the competence of consciousness as an interpreter of mental functions, This seems to me sheer paradox. I have admitted the difficulties of the appeal to the mind for a record of itself. But whether using the word consciousness, or any other, no doubt can exist of the reality of the subjective knowledge thus obtained. H 98 MENTAL OPERATIONS IN RELATION TO TIME. These and endless like instances might seem to sanction the belief in an absolute co- existence as to time of different states or acts of mind, and especially of those in which volition is concerned. Such, indeed, is the opinion held by Sir William Hamilton, and expressed in the term of Association of Ideas. It is difficult here to rescue the truth from the verbal and other ambigui- ties which beset it. But I am led to believe that Sir William did not sufficiently regard the inconceivable rapidity of these sequences of mental state — a rapidity such that to all consciousness it becomes continuity — nor make due allowance for those acts become so far automatic from habit that consciousness and volition have lost all direct relation to them. His argument that it would be impossible to compare or discriminate perceptions and ideas unless they were simultaneously present to the mind, implies a deeper knowledge of all such functions than we really possess. It is in truth as difficult to conceive the mutual relations of simultaneous states of mind, as of those directly successive ; and where the action of the will on the bodily organs is concerned our ignorance is equally complete.^ But what is this will or volition of which we all speak so fluently, but w^hich it puzzles the most pro- found philosophy truly to define ? We have nothing to do here with the old question of ' Necessity and Free-will' — that metaphysical and religious puzzle of all ages, the pith of which Milton has gathered up into * In Aristotle's treatise Ufpl alaQljmwg there is a curious discussion upon the question of the possible co-existence of different sensations iv MENTAL OPERATIONS IN RELATION TO TIME. 99 one grand line of his poem. We are now regarding simply that faculty through which the mind acts upon matter without, and especially upon that body with which it individually co-exists — a co-existence so mysterious that language applied to it is but a shelter to our igno- rance. Neither into tliis problem need we enter here. What bears more upon our subject is the fact, well attested by experience, that actions produced at first by express volition gradually assume from repetition much of the character and force of instincts. The will initi- ates some act of change. The subordinate acts fulfilling the intent become in the end so automatic that con- sciousness is lost in their rapid and unerring sequences. We will to walk, to talk, to read, to write. In the child each particular part of these acts requires a spe- cial direction of mind, an effort of will. As life goes on, and they become habitual from repetition, the mind may be said to relegate a part of its power to the bodily organs. It puts them into action, stops or controls them, but has no separate consciousness of these multitudinous motions, rapid almost to continuity, me- thodised automatically, and synchronous for different organs. These automatic acts, in their various relations to the intellect, will, and passions of man, as well as in their relations to the instincts of other and lower ani- mals, form a part of the great network of hfe, which neither philosophy nor science have yet unravelled. It is on these acts, as associated with volition, that I believe mainly to depend the theory of a possible H 2 100 MENTAL OPERATIONS IN RELATION TO TIME. absolute synchronism of separate states or acts of mincl.^ But despite the difficulties of language the question on which I am writing may again be inteUigibly stated. Is it not a more exact as well as simpler conception of mental phenomena to regard their connexion as one of series and succession, rather than of synchronous or co- existing functions ? When the mind is in one distinct state of thought or emotion, can another and different state supervene without removal of the former ? The distinction here cannot be challenged as one of method merely. But, in truth, method itself, in a research thus complex and obscure,, is one of the conditions most essential to success. And, as already said, I think that which I am now suggesting to be valuable, not solely as subsidiary to others, but as itself affording results which no others can equally obtain. To use two Greek words actually applied under similar purport, I prefer the ypaixixY} rather than the xdx'kog as a foundation for mental analysis. In speaking just now of volition, I had chiefly in view the action of this power on or through the mate- rial organs. But also in regard to the purely mental processes, the same question presses upon us, ' What is the will ? ' How far by effort of mind can we govern the sequences of thought, and those great functions of ^ Sir W. Hamilton encounters the question, before taken up by Abraham Tucker, Bonnet, and others, what number of objects the mind can embrace at once. He tried the experiment with marbles thrown on the floor, and found reason to believe that the mind could simultaneously gi'asp the number six. Mr. David Forbes (' Nature,' Feb. 9, 1871), by similar experiment with beans, limited the number to four or five. But this is a form of trial in which the sense is mainly concerned. MENTAL OPERATIONS IN RELATION TO TIME. 101 memory and association, through which these sequences are especially manifested ? To answer this question we might well put aside the word Will altogether, as one so variously and vaguely used, both in philosophy and common hfe, that it perplexes rather than clears the path of enquiry. It is hard indeed to find any simple term wherewith to express the poteiitiality of the mind over its own ope- rations. Where even consciousness draws so shadowy a line between what is voluntary and involuntary-r- where association of ideas expressed by their sequence occurs so often independently of the will, or even despite it — and where the power of controlling this sequence varies so much in different minds and at dif- ferent times in the same mind, we must needs feel that we are immersed in a metaphysical mist, which it is difficult either to illumine or disperse. The faculty of volition, if such we may term it, is so inextricably blended with what is automatic in the acts of memory and association, that we can draw no distinct line of disseverment, nor even mark by consciousness when volition is lost in successions of mind which it does not control, or in bodily actions which habit has rendered next to instinctive.^ Here again the method of enquiry, by succession in time, seems to me to go farthest in explanation of the ^ A curious illustration of the difficulty besettiug these questions is the doubt still propounded, whether we think in tvords. Several writers (Schelling and Hegel among the Germans) hold that there must be language in thought as a necessity of the mental act — an opinion not easy to reconcile with the fact that other animals think as well as man ; but worth noticing in proof of the obscurity that clouds over the most familiar functions of mental life. 102 MENTAL OPERATIONS IN RELATION TO TIME. phenomena — a limited interpretation, it is true, since we really know nothing of that mysterious mechanism by which one thought engenders another, or the memories of past things are revived, sometimes after half a life has gone by without a shadow of them having crossed us. All that has been written upon the asso- ciation of ideas and memory, with or without the aid of cerebral anatomy, is but a confession of this igno- rance. The work of Hartley, which I can recollect as still in some repute, was a futile attempt to explain phenomena mechanically, which the better science of our own time has shown to be inapplicable. Eeceding from what is impossible, let us see what may really be gained by this manner of regarding the mental states as a series successive in time. And first, as to the amount of power the mind has, or habitually exercises, in determining these successions. Such power is evidently a limited and fluctuating one. Thoughts and emotions are ever coming in upon us unbidden or despite the will ; clinging to us as moments of mental existence with more or less tenacity, displaced either by mental effort or by external causes. All this is true as regards the action and changes of the mind within itself, apart from things without. I am speaking here of what are really familiar facts, but not duly noted as such, or followed to the conclusions they suggest. Foremost among such conclusions is that of the great difference of different minds, as regards the power of governing these sequences of state-^of initia- ting a series, and holding to it steadily, despite hin- drances from without — and changing or suspending the MENTAL OPERATIONS IN RELATION TO TIME. 103 succession by effort of will. No one can fail to recog- nise the reality of these differences. Who does not see in them the material for definition of the highest forms of intellectual power ? This faculty of govern- ing and directing the operations of mind — one of the peculiar prerogatives of man — expresses in its degree the superiority of one man to another. Let the test be applied to those whom we meet in the familiar in- tercourse of life. You see the mind of one man sub- mitted to vague and incoherent associations, unable to maintain continuity of thought, or to disengage itself from any dominant idea or feeling of the moment. Contrasted with this defect is the power, just denoted, of guiding and controlhng the operations which form in themselves our intellectual and moral existence — a power varying in every degree — ^innate for the most part in the individual, but susceptible of change from the incidents and conditions of life — necessary to the highest grades of mental excellence; but in its en- feeblement, from whatever cause, reducing man to a lower level of mental being. It is not easy to find language for the exigencies of this enquiry. We are speaking at once of mental operations and of the power of the mind to change and control them. How are we to separate and distin- guish functions thus blended in one identity of exist- ence? The ancients in some sort did it, by their distinction of the vov*; and xJjvxtJ ; the latter represent- ing a higher spirituality, farther removed from the material world. Our own words, mind, soul, &c., are perhaps less definite, yet all tend to denote, however 104 MENTAL OPERATIONS IN RELATION TO TIME. vaguely, a line dividing the more mechanical functions of the mind from that higher individuality, which is conscious of itself in itself But here again we are met and entangled by the new doctrine of unconscious cere- bration — a perplexing phrase, yet not more perplexing than the function it professes to describe. We admit, and are arguing upon, that succession of mental states which in their series form the individuality of our being ; partly governed by the will, partly automatic from habit or the influence of the external senses. But this hypothesis, yet unproved, of ' unconscious cere- bration ' supposes intellectual operations in which con- sciousness has no part, but which nevertheless evolve true logical results. It is difficult enough to interpret the phenomena of sleep and dreaming. But here we are called on to recognise an exclusion of mind from the highest function of mind — a stretch of metaphy- sical paradox hard to admit, even while confessing our ignorance as to those other relations of the simply material and spiritual in our nature which no analysis can reach. Eeverting now to our especial enquiry, we find much to illustrate the value of the mode of research I have sought to indicate. Take, for instance, the un- doubted fact that the operations of some men's minds are more rapid in logical sequences than those of others. Such inequality has been shown to exist in the time required for transmission to the sensorium of actions on the organs of sense, and of vohtions con- veyed to the motor organs. The experiments of Helmholtz and Du Bois Eaymond on the rate of trans- MENTAL OPERATIONS IX RELATION TO TIME. 105 iniission of nervous power come in evidence here, as also the curious facts deduced from delicate astro- nomical observations, showing that different observers perceive and record phenomena under appreciable average difierences of time.^ We go but little beyond their material evidence in asserting that one mind is more rapid than another in the pure operations of thought, whether governed by the will or not. Common observation liere gives cogent proof, not solely of differences in the minds of others, but of diversities, w^ell worthy of note, occurring at different times in our own. Who is not conscious to liimself of moments when thoughts stream through the mind with more than wonted force and rapidity ? when, to use Locke's words, ' the mind will press forwards, and there is no holding it in ? ' Who, on the other hand, is not con- scious of times when the faculties are sluggish, when reason halts as if unable to pursue a train of thought, and the mind passes into vacant reverie, or is domi- nated over by some single idea from which it cannot disengage itself? Even the simple act of reading be- comes an experiment of the differences of time in the reception of ideas in different persons. Some, as a sort of necessity, read or utter each word singly ; others compass the meaning of many words by a glance. Some explanation may be given of their diversities ^ My friend Professor Mitchell, of the Cincinnati and Albany Obser- vatories, published a formula of personal equation, founded on the relative aptitudes of different observers as expressed by time. On this subject I would advert to a curious passage in Lucretius (ii. 262 et seq.), where he adverts to time as intervening between the act of the will, and the sequent effect on the bodily organs. 106 MENTAL OPERATIONS IN RELATION TO TIME. through that view of the phenomena of sleep which I have dwelt upon elsewhere, as the only just exponent of this great function of our nature. But self-conscious- ness is the only true interpreter of these changes of mood and state, which are ever going on in the indi- vidual mind, from causes objective or subjective, known or unknown. I have already spoken of the difficulty of thus turning the mind inwards upon its own acts and states. A yet greater difficulty is that of self-experiment upon the conditions — to try, for instance, what can be done by pure effort of will in determining the objects and sequences of thought which, in their common course, are so largely governed by automatic associations of former images and memories. An act of recollection may in some sort be called an exercise of the mind upon itself. But I have sometimes in my own case tnade more explicit trial of this kind, making time a part and test of the experiment. Within a minute I have been able to coerce the mind, so to speak, into more than a dozen acts or states of thought, so in- congruous that no natural association could possibly bring them into succession. In illustration I note here certain objects which, with a watch before me, I have just succeeded in compressing, distinctly and successively, within thirty seconds of time — the pyramids of Ghizeh; the Ornithorhynchus, Julius Caesar, the Ottawa Falls, the rings of Saturn, the Apollo Belvedere. This is an experiment I have often made on myself, and with the same general result. It would be hard to name or describe the operation of mind by which these successive MEXTAL OPERATIONS IX RELATION TO TOIi:. 107 objects have been thus suddenly evoked and dismissed. There is the volition to change ; but how must we define that effort by which the mind, without any principle of selection or association, can grasp so rapidly a succession of images thus incongruous, drawn seem- ingly at random from past thoughts and memories? I call it an effort^ because it is felt as such, and cannot be long continued without fatigue. But it can hardly be called an effort of ivill, since this seems to do nothing more than make the mind a tabula rasa for the moment, to receive the new objects so strangely — I might almost say, irrationally — wTitten upon it. The whole conies within those mysterious inter-relations of mental life of which we can only truly speak in confession of our ignorance. Quitting this instance of what might be called a play of the mind upon itself, I may notice other cases illustrative, more or less, of that succession in time of mental acts which, as a basis of enquiry, I am seeking to suggest. I have already alluded to the great diversities in that power, by which we give connexion and order to the sequences of thought, constituting what is called Eeason. It is as curious as instructive to study men's minds through their different syllogistic capacities. Locke says : ' There are some men of one syllogism, some of two syllogisms, and no more ; ^ and he might have denoted yet more forcibly those diver- sities which render the processes and results of one man's reasoning absolutely unintelligible to others. It may further be observed how curiously the sequences in some minds are dislocated^ as it were, from all 108 MENTAL OPERATIONS IN RELATION TO TIME. common and natural connexions. The thoughts in such persons are inconsecutive and fragmentary ; and the mind, working dreamily within itself, takes little heed of what comes from without, even of the responses of common conversation. Some of these cases, of which I have seen many, tend to more serious mental aberra- tion, forming one of the several links with insanity under the multiform shapes which mental maladies assume. All these abnormal states form a large school for study, in reference to the successions and correla- tions of mental acts of which I have now been speaking. The idiot and the maniac interpret to us many of the conditions of the soundest and most capacious minds.^ How different, again, are the m,odes of thinking of the same mind at different times ! I have already alluded to this ; but everyone who cares to do so may collect illustrations replete with interest from his own consciousness. Take the instance of that sudden quickening and elevation of mental power which is obtained when the faculties are strongly evoked by occasion or necessity, as in public speaking, in close and cogent argument, in the repartee of wit. The case of the orator is perhaps the most striking. As he warms with his theme — ' ubi res agitur, et vera dimi- catio est* — thoughts, memories, images, and words crowd upon him for utterance with unwonted rapidity, and for a time his mind seems raised to a higher level of genius and power. Conversely, the faculties which * When Roger North describes his brother Dr. John North as ^ the most intense and passionate thinker who ever lived and was in his right mind,' he is using phrases which do not go beyond the frequent reality. MENTAL OPERATIONS IN RELATION TO TDIE. 109 are capable of being thus quickened and invigorated by intellectual society and struggle are seen or felt to decline in power when brought into contact with feebler intellects and frivolous subjects of thought. Such instances are familiar to all who take even ordinary note of mental phenomena in themselves and others. The mind rises or falls from the conditions to which it is subjected. This whole subject of its transient states is, in truth, a very curious one, and not, I think, adequately studied. It embraces, of course, not merely momentary changes like those just described, but those larger fluctuations which the totality of life brings before us — changes belonging to the different ages of man, the appurte- nance of poetry as well as philosophy, and finely por- trayed by the genius of Horace and Shakespeare. But the daily and hourly fluctuations of state are those of most import to the philosophy of mind. Eochefoucauld says, and truly, ' On est quelquefois aussi different de soi-meme que des autres.* We speak of the mind as a unit, and in the broad sense of personal identity it is so. But within this individuality lie those many and ever-changing diversities of intellect and feelings which enter into the current of each single life. Observation unceasingly tells us of the influences alike of external and internal causes in producing these transient states of mind. Hunger and satiety, heat and cold, fatigue and repose, exuberant health and the languor oF dis- ease, are the commonplace interpreters of the fact. Opium, wine, and the other narcotics and stimulants, each has its peculiar effect for a time on this the higher 110 MENTAL OPERATIONS IN RELATION TO TIME. part of our nature. So much must be conceded to the materiahst, whatever use he may make of it. Look, too, at the influence of weather on the mind, felt, in- deed, more generally than is recognised. He must be a man of blunt sensibility who is not exhilarated by a sudden burst of sunshine amidst the clouds and gloom of a stormy day, or softened by the still repose of a summer evening. These continuous changes may be said, in fact, to embody in themselves the totality of hfe, of which they are the active and direct expression. Occurring in those whose lot is cast in the higher places of the world, the effects of such passing moods of mind are often wide and lasting. The obscm^e or secret por- tions of history, cherished as such by learned and ingenious historians, might in many cases, I doubt not, be best construed through these erratic states of our common nature which govern monarchs, ministers, and leaders of armies, as well as lesser men. There is more of this in the philosophy of history than can ever be told. A few remarks still remain before quitting our en- quiry. I have already suggested that the term of suc- cession might well be substituted for that of association of ideas. It is obvious tliat the acts or states of memory, the most mechanical of the intellectual func- tions, must come under the same view ; and the vaga- ries^ as they may well be called, of this great function are in truth best interpreted by this method of enquiry. Eecollection, however (the dvdfivr)cn<; of Aristotle, who Avell draws the distinction), has a higher interest as an MENTAL OPEIL\TIONS IX RELATION TO TIME. Ill active faculty of mind, and one which strikingly illus- trates the diversity of power in different individuals as well as in the same person at different times. I might say much on these phenomena of memory and recol- lection, as bearing on the subject before us ; but they are too numerous and complex to be dealt with as a mere appendage to other enquiry. Another remark, however, occurs which cannot well be detached from the general method of enquiry I am sugesting. In writing elsewhere on the pheno- mena of sleep and dreams I have noticed our imper- fect knowledge of these functions, as concerns the changes they presumably undergo at different ages, and under different conditions of life. This remark apphes not less to the processes and associations of the waking mind. We go but partially to work in analy- sing the acts of the adult and cultivated intellect. The observation of these needs to be supplemented by a knowledge, much more difficult to obtain, of the con- ditions of uneducated infancy and childhood — of the intellectual imbecihties of old age — of the deficiencies and aberrations of the idiot and lunatic — of the mind of the rustic or of the factory operative, his life a machine of manual labour. Not only the subjects of thought, but the power ^ methods^ and rates of thinking are presumably as diverse in these several cases as are the conditions themselves. In most of them the materials on which the mind acts are fewer and more simple, and their combinations proportionally less complex. Admitting exceptions for certain forms of lunacy, we may presume the succession of mental 112 MENTAL OPERATIONS IN RELATION TO TIME. states, of perceptions, acts of reason and volitions, to be generally less rapid and their changes less various in these instances ; and, what tells more in the in- tellectual comparison, the power of the mind over its own sequent operations is feebler and less coercive. The differences may be of degree only, but they gra- duate between the intellect of an infant or idiot and that of a Newton or Shakespeare. I might from my notes add something more on this interesting topic. But I have said enough, I hope, to mark it out as a special path by which to seek further ingress into the mysteries of our mental nature — a path, however, like any other having this direction, stopped at the same point by a barrier insuperable to all. 113 ASTRONOMY AS A SCIENCE.— THE SUN. What I may write under this title will be but a partial glance at that progress in Astronomy, which more than ever marks this science as one of the most wonderful, but not duly appreciated, attainments of man. I know no case in which the marvellous is so lost in the familiar as the indifference with which men gaze on the stars of heaven on a night of clear sky. Were it one star or planet only, or the multitude seen for the first time, the sight would be felt as one of wonder and awe. Such feeling is finely expressed by Pascal and Kant in noble passages of their writings. But it is lost by repetition, even to those who know the grandeur of the objects — the magnitudes, distances, and periods of time, with which astronomy as a science is concerned. We look at the full moon and on the swelhng tide of a great river, ignorant or failing to feel the grandeur of that mysterious power which gives physical connexion to objects seemingly thus remote. Men and women come out of their crowded assemblies at midnight and look up to the dome of heaven and its ' patines of bright gold' w^ith less interest than to the ceiling of the theatre or the lights of the ballroon they have just left. The great zone of the Milky Way, with its lustre of innumerable worlds, is seen without I- 114 ASTRONOMY AS A SCIEXCE. — THE SUN. amazement ; though even ancient poetry described it as the ' Via in coelo sublimis,' the ' Iter ad alta tecta Tonantis.' One who passes from the hazy skies of our island to the splendid midnights of the Mediterranean or of tropical lands, may for a time be moved by the wonderful spectacle above him. But familiarity here also speedily deadens the impression, save to such a poet's eye as that of Lucretius, who in some of his finest lines (ii. 1025 et seq.) attributes the difference with which these wonders are regarded to the cause just stated. Paley says, and rightly, that astronomy does not furnish the best argument to natural theology. The objects are too vast, and their final purpose too obscure, for a just appreciation in this sense. A single fitness to some manifest purpose in a single organ of the body affords more instant and entire conviction. Stellar astronomy in particular, as developed by the labours of the last hundred years, deals with numbers and dis- tances so far beyond all comprehension, that common behef recoils at the very ingress to this great vision of the universe ; and higher intellects can hardly pursue the facts admitted to the conclusions they involve. I have known men of strong reasoning powers, but otherwise directed, sceptical as to their reality, and needing to be told of the return of Halley's comet or Encke's at the predicted time, and of eclipses and tran- sits exact to the minute foretold long before, or to be shown a nebulous spot in the sky resolved by the tele- scope into innumerable stars, before their belief could be got for the yet more profound attainments of the ASTROXOMY AS A SCIEN^CE. — THE SUN. 115 science. Certain of the most striking discoveries of the elder Herschel — such as the motion of the sun and its planets in space, and the results derived from his method of gauging the heavens — were for a time doubtfully received even by astronomers themselves. At that period, indeed, the science had gone little beyond the confines of the solar system in any scheme of exact research. We had a partial nomenclature of stars, and a knowledge of relative brightness and posi- tion, the latter facts often expressed by whimsical analoojies drawn from a distant and credulous ao^e. The true sidereal astronomy is of recent date, and owes much of its wonderfid achievements to the increased power and perfection of the instruments employed. It has now bridged over the interspace between our own and other systems of worlds, and shown by sure arguments from evidence that there is no actual gap in the series — that some at least of the forces and ele- ments in the worlds thus remote in the universe are identical with those which give movement, order, and life to the globe we inhabit — and that we may safely affirm unity of cause, if not unity of laws, as regards the whole. In this conclusion of the imity of crea- tion, and therefore of the Creative Power, we have the strongest argument which astronomy ministers to natural theology. But there is another proof, though less direct, to be drawn from this source. Notwithstanding the ignorance of the mass of mankind of the objects and attainments of astronomy, the science itself is that which best shows the intellectual capacities of man in I 2 116 ASTRONOMY AS A SCIENCE. — THE SUN. their most exalted application. Testifying thus to the highest conditions of mental endowment, it casts a reflex light on that creative design and power which, what- ever the manner of evolution, could bring these facul- ties into existence and exercise. Look simply at what this science expresses regard- ing man in comparison with the animals nearest to him in the scale of life. The hghts of heaven, the sun, moon, and stars give images to the eyes of all these creatures, as to those of the astronomer. But to them they are images only, without note or result. To the astronomer those simple circles and points of light are the interpreters of the universe. He discovers through their places, aspects, and motions those astonishing facts as to space, time, and magnitude which figures fail to express to the thought, and the laws which, with un- erring power, pervade these vast spaces and periods of time and govern all the movements and mutual relations of the worlds around us. Few men reach this high intellectual level, but man is the only being to reach it. Astronomy is rich in examples, but one or two may suffice to show this meaning. A satellite has just been discovered of Sirius — that great globe shown to be equal in size and light to sixty of our suns, and some millions of times more distant in space. A few years ago Bessel, from a minute periodical variation in the right ascension of this star, conjectured the existence of such a satellite. It has now been seen, and with it some fainter luminous points, the possible indices of a planetary system of this great sun. But a short time ASTRONOMY AS A SCIENCE. — THE SUN. 117 before, the beam of light from Sirius (reaching the earth after a passage of years through intervening space) has been made to yield a photographic image of the star and a spectrum with hues corresponding in part with those of the sun — proving thereby the exist- ence and identity of the chemical rays, and the presence of certain material elements in this remote part of crea- tion, which recent discoveries have shown to be in common to the earth and the sun. The researches now directed to this great centre of our own system similarly attest the genius and suc- cessful labours of modern astronomy. Some thu-ty years ago it seemed as though our knowledge of the sun had reached its highest possible attainment. Its distance from the earth, its magnitude and specific gravity, the laws by which it governs the orbital motions of the planets and comets, its own proper motion in space, the time of rotation on its axis, and the dark spots on its surface indicating this time ; its influence on the ocean-tides, &c. — all these things had been either exactly or approximately de- termined. The hght and heat of which it is the per- petual fountain, though comprehended in their origin only as emanations of force, had been the subjects of admirable analysis in their passage through space in the solar spectrum, and in their influences on matter, living or lifeless, on our own globe. Speculation on some points went further, but more exact science for a time halted here. It was but a halt, however, and this at the threshold of what may almost be called a new science of the sun, 118 ASTRO^^OMY AS A SCIENCE. — THE SUN. such and so numerous have been the discoveries since made. One of these, however, is the discovery of an error. The mean distance of the sun from the earth (calculated and accepted by astronomers upon a paral- lax derived from two transits of Venus a century ago) has been recently revised upon new bases of observa- tion, and the estimate reduced by 3,000,000 of miles, or about a thirtieth part. This correction may seem trifling to those ignorant of the exactness of the science. To the astronomer it is a weighty one, and the more striking because derived from the concurrence of dis- tinct sources of evidence. The direct proofs are from astronomical observations, but one detached proof, sin- gularly coinciding in date, deserves especial notice, as being drawn from experiments by Foucault and Fizeau on the velocity of light — some of these experiments of such admirable subtlety of device and execution that an apparatus confined to a single room sufficed to de- monstrate the velocity of a ray, passing through 185,000 miles in a second of time ! This rate of motion, less by 7,000 miles than that deduced from the occultation of Jupiter's moons, almost exactly concurs w^ith the correction just noticed as to the distance of the sun — a coincidence satisfying the most rigid conditions of en- quiry. No fact can better illustrate the prowess of modern science, in continually bringing to the dis- covery of a common truth phenomena and even laws seemingly distinct in the natural world. This remark applies not less to other polar pheno- mena recently disclosed, and eminently to those great discoveries by aid of the lines in the spectrum, which ASTRONOMY AS A SCIENCE. — THE SUN. 119 show the existence in the media enveloping the body of the sun (photosphere, chromosphere, or by whatever name designated) of various metalHc elements and gases familiar to us on the surface of the earth. The methods by which certainty has been given to this wonderful result, while they illustrate the physical relations of all that is greatest and smallest in the material world, do also strikingly express that growth of intellectual power through which man has reached a knowledge thus far beyond that of all prior ages ; beyond even what might seem the destined limit of human attainment. Nor is any such hmit yet obvious to us. The very negation of various terrestrial metals, shown by the absence in the solar hght of the lines interpreting them, and the existence of hnes in the spectrum to which we have no index in our earthly catalogue, are facts equally preg- nant for the future. Even while writing this paper, with intent to illustrate by solar researches the present aspect and aims of astronomical science, these re- searches are in active, almost daily, progress ; bringing before the eye movements and changes ever going on upon the surface of this vast central luminary — ^pheno- mena which, though of surpassing grandeur in their scale, depend upon the presence in the sun of certain material elements identical with matters ever present and active on our own globe. It is well to note here, as an index to the mutual relations of the physical sciences, that chemistry, optics, electricity, and tele- scopic observation are all concerned and blended in the methods to which these discoveries are due. We see the sun, then, no longer as a simple central 120 ASTRONOMY AS A SCIENCE. — THE SUN. globe, tranquilly diffusing its influences to the planets in surrounding space, but as a vast body, undergoing continual and violent clianges on its surface, and, it may be, secular changes also, of which time only can reveal the import and extent, but which, if exist- ing, must assuredly alter some at least of the condi- tions of our own planet. But the science of the sun in our own day does not stop here. Known in all ages as the source of light and heat — in later times as the centre of planetary gra- vitation, whatever that mysterious force may be — it has now become known, though more imperfectly, in its magnetic relations to the earth. This connexion, equally mysterious, is made almost certain by the aver- ages of long observation, involving not only the diur- nal magnetic changes included within the solar hom's, but also a seeming periodical coincidence between the maxima and minima of solar spots, and the maxima and minima of magnetic inequalities on the earth. These relations, indeed, require to be attested and defined by further research, comprising as they do the theory of the magnetic force, still imperfect in its very elements, and the physical conditions of the sun's sur- face, not yet fully understood. But their existence is sufficiently proved to carry conjecture beyond, to the probable diffusion in more remote space and among other globes of that elemental force, call it what we will, which we know, as electricity, to be associated with all states, forms, and changes of terrestrial matter, and which we cannot suppose dormant or non-existing among other worlds, subject to the same law of gravita- ASTRONOMY AS A SCIENCE. — ^THE SUN. 121 tion, emitting the same light, and even yielding in some instances a certain evidence of the same material con- stitution.^ Eecurring, however, to the sun, as one more special illustration of modern astronomy, we must look again as a part of this science to tlie still unexhausted wonders of the solar spectrum. This spectrum, formerly seen in its prismatic colours only, has now become the expo- nent of invisible rays, stretching far beyond its visible extremities ; propertied as heat at one extremity, and with those specific chemical actions at the other, which have given a new and beautiful art to mankind. The undulations conveying (or forming) the three powers thus blended in a single beam have specific relations to the different forms of matter on earth, such in kind and so essential that life and organisation would cease to exist deprived of their influence. Science is every day disclosing new and unexpected relations to this effect ; while the powerful prismatic spectroscopes now brought into use are analysing, still more minutely, and under varying conditions of heat and density in the gases evolving them, those spectrum lines of different ele- ments, the relations of which have given us such unlooked for access to the matter of the sun itself. This unceasing derivation of light and heat, and perhaps other powers, from the sun — a derivation not limited to our planet, a speck in the firmament, but » Milton, in the phrases of his noble poetry, might almost be said to predicate those discoveries of our own day. In the third book of ' Para- dise Lost ' he speaks of the sun's magnetic beam, and in the same passage of the arch-ehemic sun. A certain sort of inspiration and vaticination of the future often seems to enter into the higher poetry of each age. 122 ASTRONOMY AS A SCIENCE. — THE SUN. ever going on in every direction of space ^ — has fur- nished material for other more speculative questions in solar science. How are the losses caused by these emanations compensated or repaired? Or, seeking the cloke of words, and saying that it is force and not matter which is thus expended, how is force, in itself a real existence, restored or renewed ? Eecent theory has sought some answer to these questions in the sup- position that heat at least may be regenerated in the sun by the violent impact upon it of asteroids or nebu- lous matter from surrounding space. This hypothesis is at the best little more than conceivable. We have evidence, indeed, that matter, under various forms, does exist in interplanetary space, and that one or more asteroidal rings have orbital motion round the sun, coming into periodical contact with the orbit of the earth. And could it be that the sun does derive incre- ment of matter from these or other sources, we might infer from analogy an evolution of heat from every such impact on its surface. But admitting this, see how far we yet are from any law of equivalence ! How unable to strike a balance between loss and gain in these mighty interchanges ! Or, again, if light and heat be simply modes of motion, as modern science ventures to define them, where are we to seek the source of repa- ration in the sun, not indeed of substance, but of force or propulsive power? To say that the aggregation of new matter brings with it new power of this kind, is * Calculation at this point shows that the earth receives but the 2,300-millionth part of the light and heat which the sun radiates into space. ASTRONOMY AS A SCIENCE. — THE SUN. 123 little more than an affirmation of words, betokening, not scientific facts, but conditions and conceptions which science has failed to reach.^ These, however, are speculative matters, contri- buting little to the true physical history of the sun. The solar spots, assiduously watched by such observers as Schwabe, Carrington, De La Eue, Lockyer, &c., have added much more to our actual knowledge, though still leaving it incomj^lete as to their nature and origin. The indication they give of rotary motions of the pho- tosphere, varying at difierent distances from the sun's equator, is one curious result of very recent observa- tion. More curious still are those delicate and beauti- ful observations with the spectroscope, which tell us, without aid of eclipses, the nature of the curious rose- coloured emanations from the sun's surface, hitherto so vainly speculated upon ; and which in associating them with the agency of known elements (however vast the difference in degree) bring us nearer to that unity which it is the purpose of all science to attain. Much is still to be learnt regarding these gaseous solar envelopes, and the changes unceasingly going on in them. But the objects and methods of research are well defined, and the zeal given to their pursuit is a sure guarantee of success. Time, however (supposing a sufficient duration of ^ I find Professor Ohallis propounding another speculation on this matter, viz., that the sun may be the recipient of undulations from more remote stars — conveying them forwards through its own molecular mass, and itself not losing power by this continual transmission. An hypothesis of this kind tells little more than the intrinsic difiiculties of the question. 124 ASTRONOMY AS A SCIENCE. — THE SUN. the human race on earth) seems the sole means of solving that higher question, as to the proper motion of the sun itself, together with its planets, in the universe of space ? Whether what the short life of our astro- nomy here shows but as a rectilinear motion in a given direction through this vast void be not really the seg- ment of an orbit round some centre of gravity yet unknown ? All analogy points to this conclusion, but of more direct evidence there is none. Holding in view these various discoveries and the speculations to which tliey legitimately lead, no one having intellectual sensibility (a phrase I willingly adopt) can regard without some emotion this great orb of the sun, rising or setting on our earthly horizon — for these are the times when it may best be seen — or w^onder that there should have been races of men who have viewed it as representing the Supreme Power of the universe. The noble lines in which Milton addresses light are a. hymn to the sun itself, as the source of that wonderful element which pervades all space, minister- ing to the least as well as to the greatest purposes and acts of the Creative Power. In the foregoing paper I have taken the sun as representing to those who are not familiar with the subject the metliods and progress of modern astronomy. Many other examples might have been taken in illustration, but none more striking than this. 125 LIFE ON THE EARTH.— RELATIONS OF MAN TO OTHER ANIMALS. 1868. MoDERX SCIENCE has been active in decipliering the succession and relation of different forms of hfe on the earth. The grand marvel is the existence of life itself All questions are subordinate to this, whether they concern the innumerable forms now in being, or that long and wonderful series of extinct existences which fossil geology has disclosed. What is Life ? It has undergone a dozen defini- tions, some by very eminent authorities, but all liable, more or less, to objection from error, incompleteness, or obscurity. The problem has pressed upon q\qyj age, and in our own time has been brought into connexion with the latest discoveries of physical science. Nevertheless, we still need a definition which may satisfy all the essential conditions without becoming valueless from its too great generality. That given us by Aristotle, though involved in certain terms of Greek philosophy, is as good as any that have succeeded it. The well-known definition of Bichot : ' La vie est I'ensemble des fonctions qui resistent k la mort,' and that of the Encyclopedic, ' La vie est le contraire de la mort,' are too epigrammatically negative to serve to 126 LIFE ON THE EAKTH. any use.^ They omit, moreover, that which is the very essence of hfe, viz., that of reproducing hfe more or less like in kind to itself. No definition can be good which does not include the condition of an organisation capable, by sexual or other means, of such repro- duction. The definition of hfe has been perplexed by other ideas annexed to it. The terms ' vital principle,' ' vital energy,' ' vital force,' &c., though needed for descrip- tion, and which in one sense may be admitted as reahties, do not really define anything that we can construe to the understanding. We cannot assert, on proof, that life is engendered by, or engenders, any power or force special to itself. Nevertheless, in as- suming, which we must do, that it transforms certain known forces so as to appropriate them to its peculiar functions, we virtually admit a special and character- istic power, call it what we will. A formal definition (which after all has very little scientific value) may exclude what is thus ambiguous to our reason, but in the present state of our knowledge the conception of life embraces it by what is next to a necessity. Something more may be said for bringing time, as an element, into the definition sought for. Every form of life, endlessly dissimilar though these forms be, has its average period and term of existence, as well as chronometry in its various particular functions. Growth, ^ The definition by an eminent philosopher of our own day that life is 'the continuous adjustment of internal relations to external relations/ is subject to the same charge of a generality which lessens its scientific value. LIFE ON THE EARTH. 127 maturity, final decay, and death belong to living orga- nisation in its every shape on earth. In what, and how, and when did life begin on our globe ? In its lowest aspects, whether animal or ve- getable, we see nothing more than a few material elements, aggregated under the simplest forms, with very few organic functions ; yet these so propertied as to preserve existence for a certain time — to provide for a succession of similar existences — to live and die. From these simple conditions (taking animal life as best in illustration), we find a series rising upwards by broken steps to those which are most complex and complete. In no part of this ascending scale is there any very wide gap — what seemed in many instances to be such having been partially filled up by recent discovery in the living or in the fossil world. However this series may have begun, and whether worked out by progressive derivation or evolution within itself, or by successive acts of special creative powers, equally may we affirm the unity of scheme in this vast con- nected scale, and the necessity of a First and Supreme Designing Cause. If the endless forms, functions, and instincts of life which we see around us be derived by progressive changes, in unmeasured time, from a few primitive types of being, such changes bespeak vital laws and energies acting on matter through, or con- currently with, the great forces of the natural world. Under any and every view of the subject, intention by some higher Power, however obscure to man as the interpreter, is manifest as the foundation of the whole. This is the sole standing-point to our reason, when 128 LIFE ON THE EARTH. regarding the origins, varieties, and perpetuations of animal life on the earth. The science of life, in truth, is yet in its infancy. Modern physiology has done much in expounding the material changes by which individual life, springing from its germ, whether through ova, fission, or budding, is matured and maintained, and those further changes by which it comes to an end. But the ultimate mys- tery of generation is yet unresolved, and every specu- lation hitherto vain as to that vital function by which life is begotten from life, with resemblances and differ- ences equally inexplicable under any known physical laws. Putting the point in a simple but cogent form — What is that power, principle, or energy — call it as you choose — which out of a single germ, or germs, or germinal matter, or protoplasm (the names signify little) invisible to the naked eye, can evolve, by gradual accretion of fresh matter, the likeness of an anterior being, even in its minute peculiarities of structure and function — which, in the human being, for instance, can reproduce, after the omission of one, two, or more generations, some marked feature of face, some organic or functional disease, or even, as races as well as families show, certain mental characters and endow- ments ? Or what, again, is that occult principle of life in the seed which enables it, after the lapse of thirty centuries, to germinate again into the perfect plant, when the fitting conditions of light, heat, and atmo- sphere are supplied? The molecular theory, which serves to illustrate so many physical problems, is of no avail here, nor does science through any other path approach the solution of the mystery. LIFE ON THE EARTH. 129 We encounter at this point the question as to 'Spontaneous Generation,' a momentous enquiry, be- queathed to us in a vague form from antiquity, and recently revived under conditions of very deUcate experimental research. Can matter of any kind, under any circumstances, generate life without the presence of the ova or germs of prior life ? Though the enquiry has applied itself only to the lower forms of infusoria, it is one of deep interest, wliatever the solution may be — involving, as it does, in connexion with recent theories of derivation and development, the whole question as to the origin of life on the earth. The researches of M. Pasteur, admirably guarded against all contingencies of error, are in my mind next to conclusive in favour of the old dogma, ' Omne animal ab ovo.' But the opposite view sustained by Pouchet and others cannot be put aside without further enquiry. And such is now in progress, by methods which strikingly attest the exquisite exactness of modern experiment. Nothing more startles contemplation than the quan- tity of life upon the earth. Around us, above us, be- low us — air, ocean, lake, river, mountain, plains, and forests — all nature teems with it ; from the eagle, whale, and elephant downwards, to the monads and vibriosi of infusorial life. Eecently even the bottom of the sea, at the depth of two miles, has been found laden with these forms of life, perfect in their indivi- duahty, and not inferior in type to the kindred species existing above. The enumeration of animal species, so denominated, reaches at least 200,000, and is every day augmenting. But this gives a feeble idea of those K 130 LIFE ON THE EARTH. aggregates of individual lives, presented by single species, generally in proportion to their minuteness. All reckoning fails to reacli their numbers, or those of the countless multitudes of organised existences which perish as ova or before they come to maturity. Eveiy book on natural history abounds in these facts; yet few rightly comprehend them or feel adequately all that is wonderful in this enormous multiphcity of life, and in its renewal by reproduction, generation after genera- tion, through successive ages of the globe. The most minute insect or mollusc has its pedigree enrolled in the great volume of life. If man could truly read these histories some of the great problems of nature might find their solution. I may say for myself that I never enter the Natural History Galleries of the British Museum or the Zoo- logical Gardens witliout a feeling of amazement mixed with awe. And this feeling is not lost, but intensified, by contemplation of details. Whence and for what purpose in creation this marvellous number and variety of beings — of forms and organs, of instincts and ac- tions ? The question cannot be evaded by reason, and is not answered, even presumptively, by science. It extends too beyond existing life (and with incalculable time added as a part of the problem) to those fossil vestiges of extinct life which now crowd upon us so numerously from every part of the eartli. A single footstep pressed on one of the walks of the London Parks covers thousands of minute shells, each the habitat once of a living animal. Every railway tunnel under a chalk-hill carries us through massive rock, the LIFE ox THE EARTH. 131 workmanship in its origin of myriads of foraminifera. That city of Eichmond, in Virginia, of the bloody struggle around which I have recently been a personal witness, stands upon a foundation of infusorial shells. It is the destiny of life, whether animal or vege- table, to be everywhere the food of life. Death is the transmigration, not of being but of the material of being into new forms and modes of existence. This great natural law, which makes animal life in its every shape depend for evolution and maintenance upon life already existing, extends from man downwards to the lowest grades of the animal creation — strikingly exem- plified in those parasitic creatures now so numerously catalogued as to form a distinct portion of natural science. And a notable, though inexplicable, part of this great scheme of nature is the constant and obvious provision in the animal world for the maintenance of succession even at the expense of individual life. Among the insects it is common to see the individuals propagating life perish as soon as this function is ful- filled.' Without stopping to refute Buffon's strange doctrine (supported, indeed, by one recent authority), that the absolute quantity of life has been, and must ever be, the same on the globe, it is well to note here how largely physical conditions, as well as human necessi- ties and intelligence, influence its distribution over the earth. Natural history is profuse in examples to this effect, both in the animal and vegetable world. Even as regards human life we are continually admonished as to those accidents and conditions of existence, K 2 132 LIFE ON THE EARTH. physical and social, which augment or lessen its amount on any given area of the globe. Take the single case of Ireland. The potato, naturalised as a food of the country, raised its population to the inordi- nate amount of eiglit millions. The potato disease of 1845 and the following years (the work of one of the lowest forms of parasitic life) took off nearly a quarter of this number by famine or emigration. In every .crrade below man in the animal kingdom life is simi- larly subjected to the conditions which press upon it from Avithout, either such as are purely physical or the conflicts of different forms of animal life with one another. This is in great measure a new branch of knowledge, and it has already been rendered a prolific one. We see how not only the quantity but also the organisation and habitudes of life depend on local and ever-varying circumstances, and how far man is con- cerned in fixing or changing these. Much, however, yet remains to be done, as well in correcting errors of older date as in determining the laws which pertain to this part of the great problem of life on the earth. In close connexion with this subject, and its most important correlation, comes the question regarding the relations of man to the other forms of animal crea- tion peopling the earth. Surrounded on every side by living beings, consuming them, consciously or uncon- sciously, as food, and even inhaling them with every breath, this question must ever be one of deep interest to human thought and well worthy all that can be done towards its solution. Bayle says, and justly, ' Les actions des betes sont LIFE OX THE E.\RTH. 133 iin ties plus profonds problemes sur quoi iiotre raisoii peut s'exercer.' Taking the simplest view of the rela- tions involved in this problem, we may speak of man as the head of the living creation ; the latest, probably, certainly the loftiest, in that long series of existences which we follow downwards till animal life is lost in the lower organisms of the vegetable world. But this is a feeble outline of all that the question involves. Within the wonderful series just denoted lie whole volumes of facts, inviting or almost compelling research into the connexion of the human being with creatures lower in the scale of life. The careless thinker may let his reason go to rest on this admitted human supre- macy. The philosopher, looking on the dog crouched at his feet, sees in him an animal with organisation variously akin to his own — with intelligence, memory, feelings, and passions of the same kind, however differ- ing in degree and manner of use — ^with appetites and necessities of life similar also, though more in subordi- nation to instinct and hereditary habits of the species. The idle spectator gazes on the anthropoid ape with mere merriment at this mockery of human form and gesture. The man of deeper thought cannot stand in face of these creatures without some feeling of awe in the contemplation of that mysterious scheme of crea- tion which has brought them thus near to himself in the scale of animal beings. Pascal says : ' II est dangereux de trop faire voir a I'homme combien il est egal aux betes, sans lui montrer sa grandeur. II est encore dangereux de lui trop faire voir sa grandeur sans sa bassesse.' The cau- 134 LIFE ON THE EARTH. tion is chiefly needed for philosophers, since to the general sense of mankind famiharity disguises this great wonder of the world of life. But the science of our day, bringing fresh methods to bear upon it, has boldly encountered the problem — encountered, but not yet solved it, as far as regards that question of intention or design which lies at the bottom of the whole. The wider observation and better classification, and the study of fossil remains, aided by all the resources of comparative anatomy, have wonderfully enlarged this domain of knowledge, but in doing so have given origin, and legitimately, to new hypotheses still under active controversy. I especially allude here to that doctrine of evolution or transmutation of species by which it is sought to reduce to certain natural laws of change, selection, and succession those inter-relations which pervade the animal world from man down to the lowest zoophyte — a doctrine which has received its latest and happiest illustration from the work of Mr. Darwin on the Origin of Species. But, apart from this larger hypothesis, other and more absolute results have been derived from the researches of our own day. It is almost needless to mention one of these, coming in refutation of a vulgar notion that the creation of the rest of the animal world is but a corollary to that of man — a ministration, as it were, to his higher being. Every part of natural history, and very especially the history disclosed to us by fossil remains, utterly annuls any such concep- tion. Man is the highest and most wonderful member of the created series. But he is integrally a member LIFE OX THE EARTH. 135 of it. And it would not be too much to affirm, were such vague affirmation worth having, that not one- hundredth part of the animal creation, counted by species, has relation, direct or indirect, to his existence on earth. Wliile discarding, however, any such assumption of the dependent relation of other animals to man, we must admit that another relation presses more cogently upon us if we adopt the doctrine of progress in the forms of life by gradual evolution instead of by special creation. This doctrine cannot be held, as it is held by many, without including man as a unit in the scale of pro- gression — the highest product of those laws or acci- dents of development by which inferior forms of being are raised to those of higher grade. We cannot stop short at the human threshold, if the argument for transmutation has carried us thus far. But this ques- tion, perfectly justifiable in itself, is one requiring separate discussion, though so closely allied to all other problems of the living world that none can be wholly dissevered from it. From the comparative* anatomy and physiology of the present daiy we derive a very exact knowledge of the structural and functional relations of man and other annuals, traced upwards from the dawning of hfe in each. The enquiry rises in interest as we come to the higher orders of mammalia and those quadru- manous animals the proximity of which to man even nomenclature has been led to recognise. It is needless to cite the several resemblances of structure, and of the functions to which they serve, through all the 136 LIFE ON THE EARTH. stages of generation and growth, of decay and death. The brain, as the organic minister to the mind, is the part to which we look with deepest curiosity. Though certain structural differences have been indicated, the main and most obvious distinction between the brain of the anthropoid apes and that of man is the difference of size and weight. Without quoting the various facts derived from Wagner and other enquirers, it is enough to knov,r that the cubic capacity of the largest go- rilla skull yet examined is less than half that of the average human cranium. It may be that molecular differences, unseen by us, enter into and modify the cerebral functions. But the fact still remains certain that this condition of quantity in the brain plays a part very essential in the relation of members of the animal world, including man, both individually and distributed into races of men. And the conclusion is more striking as we descend in the scale of being, and find decrement of brain associated throughout with decreasing intelli- gence, and the substitution of those instincts which become in the end the totality of life. We can in nowise reason upon this relation of size and weight to the cerebral powers. Here, as in all that concerns the connexion of the brain with the mental functions, we have barely reached the mere rudiments of knowledge. The same may be said of those cere- bral convolutions the presence and complexity of which are so remarkable in man, and which in the higher quadrumana differ less from the human type than they do from that of the lemurs, the lowest of this order. This part of structure we can in nowise LIFE ON THE EARTH. 137 interpret, either in its presence, its absence, or the variations incident to it. But the structural relations of the higher mam- malia to man are a preface only to the deeper question regarding the functions severally attached to them. Structural hkeness of organ implies likeness or identity of function. Does resemblance of brain, in its various degrees, warrant fully this interpretation ? or is there some specialty here which forbids or limits the appli- cation of the rule ? I confess I know of none. In whatever way tlie scale of animal life be arranged, there is a certain proportion found to exist between the cerebral development of the species and the presence of those faculties to which the brain ministers in man. This fact must be taken generally, as we are unable to gauge with exactness in other animals qualities and functions which are not easily described or measured even in ourselves. But in such general sense, and restricting the enquiry to the higher animals, we come upon a multitude of recognised facts, which, though escaping serious thought from their familiarity, are cogent and of deep import in the conclusions to which they lead us. Even without serious thought, however, common language has fully recognised these facts as they every day come before us. We speak habitually of the varying intelligence of different animals, individuals as well as varieties and species. We speak of their charac- ters and tempers as different, denoting thereby propen- sities, passions, and affections the same in kind which belong to the moral nature of man. I have already 138 LIFE ON THE EARTH. alluded to the dog, as the instance most familiar to us — the animal ' ad hominum commoditates generatus,' to take tlie closing words of Cicero's eulogium. Eut seeking more general illustration from among the higher animals, domesticated or wild, the following may be taken as a summary of the comparison with man. Of their reasoning faculty in this relation no happier definition can be given than that of Cuvier : ' Leur in- telligence execute des operations du me me genre.' Mil- ton says, in more guarded phrase, ' They reason not contemptibly.' The kind of reason, however narrow in its scope and combinations, is virtually the same. The mute syllogism of the monkey, or dog, or elephant is perfect as far as it goes, and might be translated into speech or writing. It is less easy to apply the term reflection to their intelligence, yet I think it cannot rightly be excluded. Locke denies to them the power of forming, ' abstract or general ideas ; ' but these terms themselves have long been the subject of controversy, and are not easily admitted into proof. That they possess and largely employ the memory of objects and events is indisputable ; but we have not the same proof as to that higher faculty of recollection — the i^vrnx-q crvvderiKTi — to which the mind of man owes so much of its power and attainments.^ Another question occurs, whether anticipation of the future comes within their scope of thought ? In- * Aristotle denies to other animals this faculty of avajxi'tiaiQ. He says, 'I'o fittjfiovtvfiv riov aWioi' Z,(>}m> fjtTtxd TroXXa ' rov Si avnnvr)nKeaFai ovHv' Cicero speaks of the * mens, ratio et niemoria' of the ant. LIFE OX THE EARTH. 139 stincts are doubtless largely prospective, and the more perfectly so the lower we go down in the scale of life. But does any animal intellect, save that of man, possess this power ? An old English writer speaks of ' the boon to brutes that they are nescient of evils to come.' And this may be true ; yet still with admission that they have some faculty of forecasting the future, where not remote as to time, and coming in close relation and sequence to the habitual events of their existence. This forms, in fact, a part of the education of animals — a term we cannot refuse to adopt for those conditions, natural or artificial, through which their several faculties are fully evolved or modified, and in many instances even made to supersede the natural instincts of the species. To other faculties, intellectual in kind, it is impos- sible not to annex the sense of humour, so conspicuous in very many animals, though not duly noticed in the inference it affords. The gambols, gestures, and sly artifices of monkeys well depicture what are the sports and tricks of human childhood. The dog, toying with his master or gambolling with other dogs, shows his feehng of fun as plainly as if it were put into words ; and a little reflection will show how much lies beneath this single and simple fact. The intellectual faculties, then, are alike in kind, while far inferior in power and capacity to those pos- sessed even by the lower races of mankind. As physiology tells us of stages in the foetal growth of man corresponding with what is the final type of in- ferior forms of life, so does the mind of the untutored 140 LIFE OJS" THE BAETH. child aptly represent those degrees of intelligence which are the highest attainment of the creatures near- est to us in the animal world. Some writers, as Lord Herbert of Cherbury, have held that the capacity for conceiving the existence of God forms the chief dis- tinction between the reason of man and that of brutes. But this may rather be taken as one of many analogous cases, expressing the limit imposed on the faculties of the latter. As respects the feelings, passions, and propensities of the animals thus near to our confines, we must re- gard them as essentially the same with those which denote the moral nature of man — very different, in- deed, in their objects, and wanting those nicer shades of the human character in its various grades of cultiva- tion, but still to be described only by the same terms and understood in the same sense. Without running into subtle distinctions of name or nature, it is enough to recite generally the common qualities most familiar to observation. Such are, love and hatred, emulation and jealousy, anger and revenge, boldness and fortitude, pride, and perhaps vanity, gratitude, cowardice, and cunning. These qualities are not defined by difference of species only. As in man, they characterise indi- viduals of the same race, and are innate, more or less, in the temperament of each. It does not concern us here to trace them down- wards in the scale of animal life till they vanish in the bare instincts of existence. The main point is, that such a scale exists, culminating in man, and in its higher grades approaching to him in the kind, though LIFE ON THE EARTH. 141 not in the degree, of these various faculties. It is a marvellous approximation, deal with the matter as we will. And interpreting it, as we must needs do, through the long gradation downwards of inferior forms, living or extinct, we can come to no other con- clusion than that of a great Scheme and Design^ under which animal life is created or evolved progressively with higher powers and endowments. It does not in- validate this conclusion that we are unable to decipher the total series, or to explain the unequal or broken steps of progress. Nor is it touched by the con- troversy now going on between the doctrine of special successive creations and that of evolution in time from one or more primordial forms. If the former be true, the design of the Creator is expressed in the successive appearance on the earth, at intervals of unknown length, of creatures rising in the organisation of those parts which minister to intelligence — if the latter, the same designing Power must have given to certain primordial forms capacities and laws of transmutation and development, enabling them to multiply into end- less varieties, and through some of these changes to at- tain to forms and faculties approximate to those of man. Eeason or theorise as we will on this matter, we can- not but end with the belief that there is a preconceived plan, however hidden from our comprehension, in all that concerns the being and conditions of animal life, and nothing fortuitous in the position of man, at the summit of the scale so designed. But recognising this conclusion, how entire is the blank beyond ! What conjecture can we form as to 142 LIFE OX THE EARTH. the purpose of this great plan, of which man comes in as the highest exponent and present terminal of the series ? How explain that long array of beings, mul- titudinous in number and forms, now buried in the rocks of the globe, and indicating innumerable ages of life anterior to man ? Any notion of tentative work in creation is excluded by the character and complexity of the series, and not less by the conceptions which alone we can form of the Creator. That Power which could confer the higher faculties of existence, either by special acts or general laws of progress, must have been capable of creating the higher without the inter- vention of the lower grades of life. But, however we may shape the argument, the fact on which it rests is that of a scale of created beings, irregular, indeed, in parts, yet showing relation and continuity throughout, and therefore what we must regard as unity in the original design. While making full confession of ignorance as to the purpose of this vast world of life around us, it must be repeated and ever kept in mind that man is an integral part of the scheme. His endowments, even as attested by those wonderful instances which form the pride of human history, are still relative in kind and degree. And if we descend in the human scale itself — detach- ing from the great mass of mankind the names ren- dered immortal by virtue, genius, learning, or art — Ave bring the connexion yet closer to those forms of animal life which, though below man, may well startle him by their proximity. No one can have travelled much, as I myself have done, or lived observantly among LIFE ON THE EARTH. 143 inferior races and classes of mankind, without becom- ing conscious of this. Poetry has told us, and truly, that gems of genius and greatness often lie hidden in silent obscurity. But we are forced to admit, looking broadly at the characters impressed by descent upon races and communities of men, that the capacity for achieving greatness is lessened — the faculties them- selves, intellectual and moral, degraded — by adverse conditions of existence, physical or social. The sad- ness of this reflection is abated by the justifiable belief that under different conditions, and aided by hereditary transmission, these faculties may be extended and exalted far beyond the limits marked by our present experience. On the latter point I have commented in another of these papers. A century more will give those then living sufficient evidence on a subject of deep interest to the future history of mankind. One question there is respecting our relation to other animals which has a specialty of its own. How much of the superiority of man depends on the won- derful faculty of speech, on which he so supremely transcends every other part of the living creation ? I say transcends^ because speech simply understood is but the communication of thought, will, or emotion by intelligible sounds ; and, so defined, it is certain that very many animals, even far down in the scale, are gifted with this power, exclusively of those other senses or instincts which serve to the necessities or pleasures of their social life. If the dog could speak with his tongue, as he does with his tail, how much of keen intelligence and warm affection would he express ! 144 LIFE ON THE EARTH. But as regards human speech, ' the joint energy of our best and noblest faculties,' we cannot confine it within any such naked definition. This capacity in man, due in part to the peculiar anatomy of the vocal organs, but more, we may affirm, to cerebral organisation, assumes in its cultivation and results a far more exalted aspect. Without entering on the wide question, now actively discussed, as to the origin, structure, diffusion, and divergence of languages, it is enough to say that the faculty of speech, nurtured and perfected in its various forms, and robing itself in those written characters which spread a silent but living speech over the globe, has done more than any other endowment in giving to man his peculiar position in the animal world. Sup- pose for a moment the annihilation of language, spoken and wTitten, and in place of it an intercourse by ges- ture or brute sounds, ' vox et pr^eterea nihil,' and think how vast the void that would ensue, how great the degradation of man's nobility and supremacy ! Those higher powers and workings of genius which have pro- cured for some men the veneration of all ages, w^ould have been dormant and fruitless, had this wonderful mechanism of language not come in aid. Take the very highest of these human achievements, and see how much depends on prior knowledge, gathered fi'om the labours of generations gone by ; which labours would have been lost but for this manner of transmis- sion from age to age. Knowledge is correlative in every sense of the word. Insulate the human mind, and its supremacy is impaired or lost. We have evi- dence of this in those nomadic and other races where LIFE 0^ THE EARTH. . 145 language has never got beyond a low grade, and is represented by written characters as rude as the life they depicture. Such men still keep superiority to the animals around them ; but it is a feeble dominion, and maintained by means which much resemble the acts or instincts of brutes themselves. The interval is lessened which separates them from the living world below. ^ Here, ho\vever, we must notice another specialty of structure, whether original or derived, which has largely aided in giving his superiority to man. This is the human hand — a member of the body well meriting the valuable volume which has been written upon it. As a subject for speculative thought it may be less im- pressive than the one just discussed. But pursued into details, it is pregnant with instruction as to those methods through which man obtained his earliest powers over matter, not solely in the common arts of hfe, but even in those sciences which have raised him so high in the scale of being. To sum up the results of all reasoning on the sub- ject, they amount but to this, that there is a designed plan in the totality of life on the globe, as it has been, and as it now is — that man enters as an integral part into this plan — and that progress towards higher grades * There is a striking expression of William Humboldt on the humjtn faculty of speech : * Der Mensch ist nur Mensch durch Sprache. Um aber die Sprache zu erfinden miisste er schon Mensch seyn.' And elsewhere he describes man as * ein singendes Geschopf, aber den Gedanken mit den Tonen verbindend.' The speculation regarding mutism as a step of transition between the brute sounds of the anthropoid animals and the language of man is a notion held only to fill up a gap in a theory. L 146 LIFE ON THE EARTH. of existence is one part of the great scheme we thus contemplate in outhne. Our real knowledge does not go beyond ; nor can we reach, even by the hardiest human conjecture, to that Supreme Purpose, past, pre- sent, and prospective, which lies at the bottom of the whole, and to which man is submitted in common with all other forms, from the highest to the lowest, of animal life. 147 ANIMAL INSTINCTS. [Written in 1869.J This is one of those subjects of enquiry in which, though furnished with facts and instances innumerable, we yet fail to reach that ultimate truth which it is the object of all pliilosophy to attain. !N'o effort of reason or speculation has yet reached the core of the question. In a chapter on ' Instincts and Habits,' in my volume of ' Mental Physiology,' I have sought to define the actual state of our knowledge on the subject ; and the relation of this great problem of animal life to others blended with it — inextricably blended, we may say, since no artifice of definition can dissever that continuity which pervades all forms and functions of the animal world, from the highest to the lowest. When we say that nothing is done in nature per saltum, we are denoting a general fact, if not law, which Leibnitz was one of the first to recognise and apply in philo- sophy, and which every later advancement in science has tended to illustrate and confirm— none more so than the subject before us. The following paper will be supplemental in some sort to the chapter above-mentioned. The facts must mainly be the same ; but I shall seek to give them more exphcit direction to those conclusions, posi- l2 148 ANIMAL INSTINCTS. tive or negative, which admit of being reached, A larger design would needfully embrace vegetable in- stincts also, from their close connexion and continuity with those of animal life, but to these I can only here cursorily refer. The question what we are to describe as instincts first presses upon us — one not easy to answer. We can define them under their more special forms, as dis- tinct from reason, and often even in direct conflict with it. Such definitions are familiar ; based on endless in- stances and satisfying the mind by their seeming com- pleteness. Yet if we approach the phenomena more closely, we find a border-land where reason and instinct are strangely and inextricably blended — each invading the domain of the other, and reciprocally producing changes which variously affect the functions of both. Acts, primarily of reason and voHtion, pass by constant repetition into habits having the compulsory force of instincts, and often even transmissible to offspring ; while instincts submitted to the pressure of unwonted conditions often assume ne\v faculties and modes of action, which if we shrink from calHng them acts of reason can only be interpreted as newly- developed forms of instinct. It is on this border-land, however, if anywhere, that we may hope to obtain some enlargement and better definition of our knowledge. Little or nothing is gained by multiplying examples of individual in- stincts, strange and curious though they be, and worthy of a better classification than any yet adopted. Those of the bee, the ant, the spider, the carrier-pigeon, tlie ANIMAL INSTINCTS. 149 salmon, the beaver, the tailor and weaver birds, and endless others, might be cited ; but the instances most familiar to us represent in effect the marvel of the whole, and put the common question of origin into its most cogent shape. The old instance of the beehive, quoted from one age to another, tells all that is most ^vonderful in these instinctive mechanisms of life, in- variable through all known time, and fulfilling the most complex functions of physical and social existence with a precision which no reason or volition of these creatures could efiect. ' Quel abime aux yeux du Sage qu'une ruche d'abeilles,' says Eeaumur, and says truly. What is, and whence comes, this marvellous power ? What are the forces w^hich put into action and direct the admirable mechanisms, so various for different animals, yet so invariable for each — so closely allied in many ways to the material works of man, yet mani- festly connected with other active influences, to which our knowledge of matter gives no interpretation ? The vigour of Newton's intellect, directed to this problem, found no other solution than that the Creator of Life is Himself the moving power in the innumerable forms of instinct which pervade the animal world. Such con- clusion does but plunge the problem into deeper ob- scurity. It is in effect one shape of pantheism— the barrier at which so many efforts to reach what is un- reachable come to a sudden end. But though failing to reach the ultimate truth in this matter, there are several subordinate problems lying in the way, and affording the nearest approach to it. These problems, too, are of deep interest in them- 150 ANIMAL INSTINCTS. selves, and in their connexion with the whole physiology of animal life. That which first offers itself is the relation of physical structure to the existence and variations of instincts — a question closely pressed upon us by recent doctrines and researches. Are the organic forms or material apparatus to which particular in- stincts are attached brought into this connexion by special acts of creation? Or do changes gradually going on, from whatever cause, in the forms and organs of animals produce corresponding developments of the instincts appropriate to each ? This question, which is at once seen as deeply concerned with that of the Origin of Species, goes straight to the point, and admits of no evasion. Those who hold the doctrine of transmuta- tion of species, and their derivation in the totality from some few primitive forms, must needs acquiesce in the latter view ; one sanctioned doubtless by the many cases where change in external conditions creates new habits of life, which by repetition and propagation take the character of hereditary instincts, and modify to a certain extent the bodily organisation. But the admission here is a limited one only. The doctrine in question — dis- puted, indeed, but powerfully advocated — involves really the dependence of instinctive action upon organs isation, under the direct relation of cause and effect. In assuming the evolution of new organic forms fronj material causes acting on prior organisms, themselves similarly developed from antecedent structures, instincts come in only as sequent on such changes — an ac- quired and not an original possession. It will be seen, then, how much of the point of the ANIMAL INSTINCTS. 151 problem lies within this single question. If it can be shown that some instincts are of such kind that no material organisation alone is capable of producing them — and others such that none but a special and designed organisation could evolve the particular in- stinct — ^we quit in these cases the domain of acces- sible science, and can appeal only to that higher Creative Power which is in itself the great mystery of the universe. And such examples numerously occur, seeming to compel this appeal. We cannot, with all the aids derived from comparative anatomy, the microscope, and other resources of modern science, make any actual or conceivable organisation the exponents of those social instincts of animal life which serve not solely to individual existence but to the necessities or well-being of a community — which are in numerous cases prospective in their action — are strictly here- ditary — commence, untaught, with life itself, and ter- minate only with death. How, for instance, can aught we see of the bodily structure of the hive-bee explain that marvellous fabric of the honeycomb to which even mathematicians pay their homage of ad- miration, or the social economy of the hive ? What is there in the organisation of the white ants to account for the strange and complex yet well-ordered economy of these insect communities ? Where do we find the organs giving to the salmon, to the migratory birds, to the carrier-pigeon their peculiar instincts as to seasons and localities? What is there in the beaver urging this animal to employ his constructive art, though 152 ANIMAL INSTINCTS. rendered useless by captivity ? From what structure can come that prevision of the future impHed in the simple building of a bird's nest? or what subtleties of the external senses can explain those selective instincts as to food common to every creature of the animal world ? Instances of this kind might be endlessly multi- plied, as significant as curious. They go far to sanc- tion that phrase of Cuvier's where he describes the instinct of animals as ' un reve qui les poursuit toujours.' But if so, what puts into motion these wonderful dreams of instinctive life? Anatomy, even the most searching, gives no answer to this question, and all reasoning and speculation are equally mute. It is that ultimate mystery to which allusion has already been made. While thus separating the great mass of instincts from anything we can see or conceive of mere struc- ture, it is needful to recognise the many instances where the domestication of animals, or other less ob- vious, external causes, have altered both the bodily conformation and habits of the species, impressing the character of instincts, in fixity and force, on the habits so transmitted from one generation to another. Such changes belong chiefly, if not exclusively, to what I have termed the border-land^ where intelligence is closely blended with instinct ; and they are most strik- ing where domestication by man has worked upon the highest degree of natural intelhgence. Our social re- lations with the higher apes are happily not such as to furnish much illustration. But the dog, as concerns ANIMAL INSTINCTS. 153 this point, is an instantia crucis, expounding better than any other animal that strange blending of reason, habits, instincts, and affections through which he comes into such close alliance with man, and illustrating at the same time the various affinities by which the latter is linked to inferior grades of the animal world. This relation of habits and instincts will at once be seen as one of consummate importance to the whole question before us. I have treated of it at some length in the chapter before alluded to, and shall here add only a few remarks in further illustration. Where the origin of instincts is the problem every illustration is of value, and not least those which con- verge from different points upon common truth. The definition of habit, as a mere expression of fact, is simple enough, and it may be carried far down into the animal world. But complicated with the functions of the will, as habits are, both in their origin and progress, it becomes far more difficult to describe or decipher them. In truth, this single word of will, so familiar to common speech, has been prolific of doubt and dispute in every part of philosophy. Though the mind of man especially here becomes the subject of illustration, it is not easy for the conscious- ness so to analyse its own workings as to separate the pure act of will from the other complex machinery of our mental nature. I have dwelt elsewhere on the psychological fact, as important practically as in theory, that numerous automatic involuntary acts, mental and corporeal, have their origin in acts pri- marily of the will, becoming assimilated in the end. 154 ANIMAL INSTINCTS. in compulsion as well as aspect, to the simpler in- stincts of animal existence. The life of man in its every part is replete with examples of such changes ; but with this general mark appended to them, that they are least frequent and compulsory where the mental energy is the highest. The main fact here is recognised in the iOos and coverts of Aristotle ; in the ' Consuetude, deinde Natura ' of Quintilian, and in a thousand maxims and common -places of our own day. But physiology, as a science, defines the fact far more strictly, connecting it with all the faculties, animal, intellectual, and emotional, and making it the exponent of many strange anomalies of individual life. When we say that ' habit is a second nature,' we pithily ex- press those permanent changes produced by continual repetition even in the most important functions, and which, thus infixed, are often transmitted from one generation to another. No law, however, can yet even approximately be applied to this hereditary transmission. It merges in that deep mystery of gene- ration in which so many of these secrets lie hidden. These remarks chiefly concern man, but not ex- clusively so. The kindred thus denoted between in- stincts and compulsory transmissible habits may be seen much lower down in the scale of animal life, manifestly pointing towards that ulterior question, now the subject of such keen controversy, whether all actions that we call instinctive may not be thus en- gendered from simpler conditions of existence, granting unlimited time and physical changes, unknown in quantity and quality, acting from mthout upon animal ANIMAL INSTINCTS. 155 life ? This, in fact, is the main question embodied in Mr. Darwin's doctrine of the Origin of Species. A negative answer to it can only be reached through the proof that there are classes of instincts which cannot belong to any visible or conceivable bodily organisation. I have already spoken on this point, expressing my belief that there are instincts thus characterised, and not otherwise to be interpreted to our conceptions than as original in the species or genus to which the animal belongs. The lower organisms are those in which the instincts of life are simplest and most absolute. As we rise upwards the more complex structure gives greater liability to disturbance from outward causes, and in the higher animals we find the influence of mtelhgence and feeling and the habits generated thereby. But in all these grades of being phenomena come before us which no organisation, though deciphered by the subtlest anatomy or physiology of the vital functions, can explain. In numerous cases, indeed, specialties of structure are seen, necessary to the special instincts to which they subserve. But this falls far short of proof that structure alone has generated the instinct. The powerful muscles and other structural peculiarities of certain birds and fishes are necessary to their periodical migrations by land and sea. But the act of migration itself is the marvel — determinate as to place, time, and method — guided by no sense or reason we can define or conceive, yet fulfilHng its purposes with a certi- tude no reason could attdin. Numerous animals have special apparatus adapted to objects wholly pivspective, 156 ANIMAL INSTINCTS. such as the building of nests or other preparation for futiu-e progeny ; acts often very complex in kind, distinct and uniform for the species, but in nowise explicable as a provision of reason. The sexual in- stincts, and those connected with food — appetencies essential to life on the earth— come under the same head, as acts not due to intelligence nor to any obvious structure. Look, again, to the beehive or the ant-hill, where the instincts regard the individual creature far less than the community — where such communities are made up of members differing in structure and func- tions, yet all inter-related by mutual necessities — and where the instinctive energy is chiefly manifested in making provision for the future. These instances, a few out of many, suffice to show that there are classes and kinds of instincts which cannot be interpreted through bodily organisation, either original or induced by the habits and conditions of existence. Much, indeed, may be admitted as to the latter causes, especially where the higher degrees of intelligence become interwoven with the complex fabric of life. But there still remains the profound problem of a power acting in and through this fabric of which neither our senses nor reason can render any account. It is the same mystery as tliat of the genera- tion of life from life ; the same, indeed, in a sense beyond mere analogy, since the insoluble questions are alike in each case, and so clearly blended that they can scarcely even be stated apart. If our knowledge ever advances further into tliese mysteries (including the strictly collateral one of the origin of species), it must ANIMAL INSTINCTS. 157 be by pursuing this common path. As far as I can see, there is none other open to us. I have spoken of induced habits in man and the higher animals as often acquiring an instinctive cha- racter, and even becoming transmissible to offspring. The instincts of man, as the highest in the scale, form a. very curious but difficult topic — made more difficult by the larger intelligence blended with them, and further perplexed by those innate propensities and idiosyncrasies, intellectual and moral, which give diversity to human character, and often exercise a compulsion upon it which no reason or will can take account of or resist. It is not easy by definition to dissever these propensities from instincts. But while at once the most familiar and the most inexplicable phenomena in the philosophy of mind, they will be seen to belong chiefly to individual life ; and though sometimes transmitted to oflspring, are not, like true instincts, subject to any common or certain law. The animals nearest to man in intelligence have, like him, individual propensities, but these more closely inter- woven with the pecuHar instincts of the spQcies. As we descend in the scale these individualities gradually disappear. The instincts become more definite in kind, identical for each species, and at the lowest point limited seemingly to the simple necessities of existence and reproduction. Other causes make it difficult to define the special instincts of man. The voluntary and involuntary func- tions, and those of mind and body respectively, are so variously interblended, that even consciousness fails to 158 ANIMAL INSTINCTS. detect the lines of separation. To the more doubtful instances mentioned above we may add the sexual instincts, those which express emotions of mind, as laughter, weeping, sighing," &c., and perhaps also cer- tain infantile acts occurring at tlie very dawn of life. But all these cases are less distinctly marked in their nature and origin ; and looking at the instincts of man and other animals collectively, we reach the general conclusion that reason acting through the will, and instinct guiding and governing the acts of life apart from the will, exist in inverse ratio to each other throughout the scale of the animal creation ; the latter at a certain point encroaching so entirely upon the former that life becomes a mere mechanism, however complex and wonderful the functions performed. I say at a certain point ; but who can denote the point at which every trace of intelligence is lost in the blind compulsion of instinct? The little community of sparrows in my London garden puts before me a daily picture of the curious intermingling of the two faculties ; and even in the nests of some birds we find adaptations to altered physical conditions which in man we should deem the result of intelligence. Experi- ments show that even the rigid architecture of the bee- hive and the equally rigid laws which govern this insect community undergo changes, made by the bees themselves, to remedy mischiefs inflicted from without. Unless we can satisfy our reason, or rather shelter our ignorance, by some such phrase as supplementary instincts^ we must needs admit that inteUigence is at work here. Many similar cases occur of contrivances ANIMAL IJS^STLVCTS. 159 adapted to meet casual interferences with the instinc- tive life of the species, and they might doubtless be variously multiplied by research in this direction — that is, by direct experiments made to determine how far, and by what methods, instincts interfered with may be supplemented by the resources, call them what you will, of the animal itself. Such experiments would be as curious as instructive. They are the rather to be recommended from the paucity of other means of entering into the depths of the question. The careful observation of the instincts of hybrids, and of the mixed breeds from varieties of the same species, is one of other collateral paths of enquiry, yet only partially pursued, all in the right direction, but all stopping short of those ultimate truths upon which alone a true theory of instincts can rest. In the paper before referred to I have spoken in some detail of the nervous system as that part of the animal organisation which, though instrumentally only, ministers most directly, it would seem, to the pheno- mena of instincts. The experiments which show the impairment or abolition of certain instincts by special injuries of the brain or spinal nerves, or even of the antennaj of insects, prove undoubtedly the ministration of these parts to the functions in question. They also render it probable, as do other considerations, that the excitement, direction, and catenation of instinctive acts are fulfilled directly through the nerves ; and very especially through that system of ganglionic nerves, which in its functions, direct or reflex, so largely con- trols every part of organic life. The absence of any 160 ANIMAL INSTINCTS. brain in many large classes of animals whose instincts are absolute and complete, makes It indeed necessary that we should look to these ganglia and nervous cen- tres of the trunk as the structures coming into closest connexion with them ; while to maintain this view throughout we must suppose some inscrutable form of nervous matter in the lowest types of life, where the instincts are strongly marked, though no such matter can be detected. It will be seen what various unsolved questions beset every part of this great problem. Still the rela- tion just denoted carries us a step forward in the en- quiry, by associating the instincts which bind animal life to the outer world with those pecuhar internal organisms which instinctively serve to the maintenance of life itself. It is one of the great prerogatives of science to advance itself through these secondary rela- tions, even where the ultimate problem lies beyond reach. If material organisation tells us so little on which to frame a true theory of instincts, still less can we seek this by an appeal to those powers, or forces^ as they are termed — light, heat, electricity, &c. — ^wliich act on matter universally, and not least under its or- ganic forms. Life, indeed, could not exist, or its func- tions be maintained, apart from these forces, which minister to instincts as to other vital actions. Still it is excitement and ministration only, and no solution of the mystery. Nor do we gain more by bringing the ' vital principle ' to our aid, which here, as elsewhere, is a barren phrase, veiling our real ignorance. A special work on instincts, based on larger com- ANIMAL INSTINCTS. 161 parative observation and on experiment, is still want- ing to us. More hands than one might be required, but it is a work which would well repay in probable results any amount of labour bestowed upon it ; having pecuhar interest, moreover, in its connexion with the question of the origin of species, to which I have already alluded. The main problem to be solved is the relation, as to priority or causality, between the organisation and the instincts of species. To this must be added subordinately all that concerns the hereditary nature of instincts — their relation to habits and casual conditions of hfe, including here the divergence of spe- cies into races, and the influence upon them of reason and the will. The doctrine of transmutation or evolu- tion, refusing to admit the special creation of new forms of animal life, can only explain the diversity of instincts by supposing changes of organism, needfully involving changes of the instinctive functions ; and this not only where reason and instincts work together, but also in those cases, far more numerous, where the latter, wholly detached from intelhgence, are altogether compulsory in their nature. I have already given the reasons which seem to me to make it certain that in- stincts cannot belong to structure only. In a matter thus obscure, where an unknown power comes into the question, it is something to obtain even such negative conclusion. If we. ever reach one more positive, it will probably be on that border-land already denoted, where mental and material functions, intelligence and instincts, are found together either in co-operation or conflict. M 162 EVIL IN THE WORLD. All theories, ancient and modern, which seek to ex- plain the existence of evil in the world are based mainly on one or other of the following, assumptions : 1st. The existence and counteraction to good of a per- sonal evil spirit. 2nd. The repugnancy of matter as the material of creation, or other limitation to the Crea- tive Power. 3rd. The permission or ordination of evil, under general laws, or for purposes designed by the Creator. And first, as to the doctrine of a personality of evil. Strange it is that while Christian theologians have at all times been so sedulous to shape their tenets into creeds and formularies, they should have neglected to give clear utterance on a point of such deep interest to the whole history and moral condition of man. A phraseology of belief is maintained without any open expression of it. Satan, the Devil, the Evil One, the Evil Spirit, are some of our now famihar terms, thus translated from the language of Scripture. Why are they not distinctly interpreted to us, either as meta- phorical phrases or as really affirming an individual personal existence ? One or other determination must be true, but which ? The distinction here is far more important than three-fourths of the doctrinal questions EVIL IX THE WORLD. 163 wliich distract tke Christian world and divide Christian Churches. Why should a matter thus momentous be put before us as it comes through the misty medium of Manicha3an or other Oriental philosophy ? Are there really Scriptural texts so wholly free from allegory or metaphor as to compel belief in a Being the personal author of evil ? If there are, then should the whole of our theology be remodelled, for our conceptions of God and of his relations to man are wholly altered by such belief. If there are not, then ought theology boldly to declare the negative. Nothing can be more destructive of intelligent faith than those vague terms and traditions, which obscure the truth, but which we fear either to define or discard. Probably very few intelligent persons do really believe in a personal Satan, having power or even per- mission to contravene what was designed for good in the world. I have often put the question to men of deep religious thought, and have found either that it had never definitely occurred to them, or been per- plexed to their minds by the phraseology of pulpits as well as of common speech. It has been said, and truly, that in England the great poem of Milton has done much towards giving personality and its attributes to Satan. I have known myself some curious instances of this unconscious derivation of opinion. I have looked with some attention to the use of the word ^aravas as it occurs in the New Testament, taking Griesbach's text. It must be allowed that many of these passages (some thirty-two in number) will bear, others even seem to press for, a personal interpretation. M 2 164 EVIL IN THE WORLD. But tliere are many others in which the word is clearly used metaphorically ; and these, in my mind, fiu-nish an index to the former, and a strong argument against such mode of interpretation. Would the word ever be used to express merely evil thought, temptation, or sin, if in other places it affirmed a personal being, the spirit and author of evil in the world? I think it nearly impossible that this should happen. The meta- phor embodies itself in personality. The personality, if existing, would exclude the metaphor. I refer below to a passage in St. Luke's Gospel which seems to me conclusive as to the point in ques- tion ; and to other passages showing how doubtfully the belief in an evil spirit is justified by Scriptural au- thority.^ Yet I have more than once heard the perso- nality of the Devil preached exphcitly as a doctrine of * See Luke xiii. 11, where a woman is described as irvevfia txovffa atrOeveiai: for eigliteen years ; and verse 16, where it is said of the same woman ravTtjv ^i t^T](Tsv 6 Haravac deKa Kai oktlj trt], I find Dr. Howsou, in his Hulsean Lectures (1861), quoting the men- tion of Satan by St. Paul in Acts xxvi. 18 as a proof of his existence and power. The inference I draw from this passage is just the reverse. The A«a/3oXoe of John viii. 44 conveys more of personality, yet taking the whole phrase of the context, it may be simply metaphorical for evil. Ought our translation to render cia^oXog and ^aifidvior, coming near together, under the same word of Devil ? There is evidently a different meaning in the original, whatever it may be. The passage in Matthew xii. 24 et seq. strikingly illustrates the difficulty of interpreting these several terms, to which that of Beelzebub is here added. The 7) (inaiXBia of Satan, another phrase in this remarkable passage, can fairly be construed only in an allegorical sense, which sense it reflects upon the context. The singular contradiction between 2 Samuel xxiv., and 1 Chro- nicles xxi., can only be explained (and this imperfectly) by supposing what is translated Satan to be a personification of evil thought or action. The passage in Job of colloquy between God and Satan is still more manifestly allegorical. The word rendered Satan, as far as I know, occurs nowhere else in the Old Testament. EYIL IN THE WORLD. 165 religion ; listening to which I have felt that the preacher was unconsciously annulling the unity and supremacy of God, and making the government of the world an act of partition and struggle. If it be said that the Devil is permitted for a time only, this is but saying that God permits evil for a time, and evil effected by other spiritual agency than his own. However difficult the subject be under any aspect, all wholesome belief is lost amid doctrines which thus, upon a few ambiguous texts, deface and degrade the attributes of God. I do not think it needful to speak in detail of those various modes of Oriental belief which distinctly recognise a good and evil spirit in the world — a duaUty, in fact, of Divine Being and Power. Such belief is the first grade of polytheism, and belongs to the earliest conceptions of man thus directed. 2ndly. The Eepugnance of Matter^ or other Limi- tation of the Creative Power, A familiar doctrine of ancient philosophy, attributing to matter a certain quality of passive resistance — malignity^ it has been sometimes termed — something that checks or contra- venes the Creative Will. Quotations, Greek and Latin, might be largely multiphed on this topic, and as co- piously drawn from the Gnostic writers of the early centuries. The questions they embrace cannot be better stated than in a single passage of Seneca : — ' Quantum Deus possit? Materiem ipse sibi format, an dat^ utatur ? Utrum idea materiae prius superve- niat, an materia idese ? Deus quicquid vult efficiat. an in multis rebus ilium tractanda destituant, et a magno Artifice prave formantiir multa, non quia cessat ars, 166 EVIL IN THE WORLD. sed quia id in quo exerceatur suepe inobsequens arti est?' This passage, in touching upon the origin of matter itself, brings into view the most profound question in all philosophy — the relation of the Creator to the ma- terial of creation. The problem is as insoluble now as ia the days of Seneca, and so must remain to every future age. Where neither matter nor spirit admit of other conception or definition than through the phe- nomena they bring before us, all hypotheses as to their primary relation are idle and fruitless. The word a/ox^? used in the same sense as the Beginning of Genesis, denotes what will ever be a hidden mystery to man. But that the defect or oppugnancy of matter is the cause of evil in the world, w^e may deny on this plain consideration, that what seems defect or special evil in certain parts of creation does not occur equally, or at all, in other parts, though the material worked upon, and the power working, are the same throughout. This argument applies not solely to the physical but even more to the mental and moral conditions of humanity. To every evil and imperfection there is some comparative good or perfection standing in con- trast. The creative power put forth and seen in these higher and happier manifestations cannot be judged as one hmited or controlled by some inevitable necessity in those other cases where our shallow reason discerns only evil or defect. This hypothesis, as regards matter, belongs chiefly, however, to the ancient philosophy, and I dwell upon it only because I have had occasion two or three times to EVJL IN THE WORLD. 107 argue against any such limitation of the Divine Power — on one of these occasions with the most profound thinker and acute reasoner I have ever known. 3rdly. The Permission or Ordination of Evil in the World. Ahnost equivalent terms where omnipo- tence of the Creator is assumed. The problem of evil under this relation has been the theme of endless dis- cussion among laymen as w^ell as theologians, but dis- cussion falling far short of any satisfactory conclusion. Every reasoning man has had this great question before his thought, and been forced to recoil from it, or rest on the faith that what cannot be understood here may be made clear to us hereafter. Putting aside that theological form of the question represented by the doctrine of original sin (a doctrine which creates many more difficulties than it resolves), natural reason has been variously appealed to for an answer. In this answer moral and physical evil are both concerned, and in closer relation to each other than might at first appear. It would not be easy to re- capitulate all that has been argued and written on this subject. It has been urged that without sufiering there cannot be trial of fortitude and patience — that with- out temptation to evil there can be no virtue— that the scheme of life embraces death, and thereby the painful changes which often precede it — that much of this suf- fering is due to our own errors or excesses — that the world is governed by general laws, and that man, like other animals, is subject to these laws, and to the phy- sical elements around him, throughout his existence. Arguments of this kind, if they partially content the 168 EVIL IN THE WORLD. reason, are felt still to leave an unsolved mystery be- hind. The phrase of Paley (due, however, to Balguy before him), that ' evil, as far as we can see, is never the subject of contrivance,' is perhaps the happiest that has been brought into the question, pointing as it does to the last of these methods of solution, viz., that go-" vernance of the world by general laws, which is every- where so strongly denoted to our reason as part of the design of the Almighty. To sum up all I have ever ventured myself to con- clude on this dark question. I cannot give belief to a Satan, a personal spirit of evil, infringing on the unity, if not also on the power and supremacy of God. Seeing what I do of this Divine Power, not solely on the earth, but in the universe around, I cannot suppose it to be controlled by the properties of matter or other unde- fined physical obstacles. For what remains I can come to no other conclusion than the need of great humility, and the confession that no thought or wisdom of ours can rightly comprehend that design of the crea- tion, into which man and the mixed good and evil of human hfe enter fractionally only, as parts probably of some higher scheme. I have felt an entire submission to this ignorance the best relief to those perplexities of thought which the aspects of human existence press upon everyone who thinks at all. 169 PERFECTIBILITY OF MAN. Among the many questions as to the origin and des- tinies of man upon the earth none is of deeper import than this : what, if any, higher elevation may be attained by our species in its totahty from causes, physical or moral, operating through time, with or without design, on the communities and races of man- kind ? The problem is a difficult one in its simplest shape. It is made more so by the ambiguities of lan- guage, as well as by imperfect knowledge of the actual characters and conditions of mankind at large over the globe. Within the walls of a well-endowed college, or amidst the luxurious refinements of a modern capital, the argument will be handled in a very different way from that suggested by a familiarity with savage or nomadic life — with the vast half-civilised races peopling, under one name or other, the whole of Asia — or even with the mass of those who tenant our great cities, or toil with their hands in our fields, factories, and mines. All these and other forms and attributes of humanity enter into the question. The very term Civilisation is of vague import, and difficult to apply either chrono- logically or geographically. What we call such has no permanence in place or time, but has burst forth at different periods in certain countries and communi- 170- PERFECTIBILITY OF MAN. ties, reached a certain maturity, and then been arrested or quenched. Such at least has been the history of the rise and fell of many of those ancient empires and cities which have left deepest impress upon posterity. The term, moreover, is used for what differs in kind as well as in degree. It is one of those conventional phrases which, while serving in some sort to embody the loose and floating elements of human thought, do yet often tend to obscure them. To meet the question proposed in the title above it is needful to recur to the past history of man for inter- pretation of the probable future. Though I can give but a faint outline to a subject fitted for volumes, sojne part of this interpretation must be sought for even in the origin of our species, and its relation to the other forms of life on the earth. The question, for instance, first arises, are we to regard the different races of mankind as all primitively derived from a single stock ? or are certain diversities of race such that we must look to a plural origin, to different primitive stems, in explanation of them ? Much may be said, and much has been said, on both sides. I incline myself to tlie belief of unity of origin, and have in one of my essays urged the main arguments for this view, such as the fertile interbreeding of all races, the continuous grada- tions by which those farthest separate in aspect are hnked together in all the physical and moral qualities of humanity, and those relations of language which, though obscure in part, have led some of our most eminent philologists to conclude that there is nothing in the elements or diverse forms of speech incompatible PERFECTIBILITY OF MAN. 171 with the supposition of one common source on the globe. Another enquiry under earnest discussion at the present time is yet more closely linked with the sub- ject before us. This is, the question as to the origin of species in the animal world — whether they are severally acts of special creation, or derived by successive grada- tions of evolution or transmutation from one or more primordial forms of life ? Under the latter view man cannot easily be excluded from the series so established ; and accordingly several naturalists, English and Conti- nental, have submitted to and vindicated this conclusion. Without absolutely accrediting the opinion, I must not deny that it suggests some speculations of interest as to the future perfectibility of man. If the higher qua- drumana (for the argument starts from these) be capable, under any conditions, casual or designed, of attaining to the human attributes, why may not man — a member of the series, though supreme in the scale — be considered capable of developing, in pro- gress of time, more exalted forms of those faculties which are now distinctive of his place in the world? On the other side, again, comes the question, if man be the latest in a long succession of special acts of creation, why may not other beings with still higher attributes be hereafter brought into existence in a similar way ? It would be fruitless to bring questions of this obscure nature into the argument before us. The former opinion has doubtless attracted most attention, in its connexion with the origin and development of 172 PERFECTIBILITY OP MAN. animal species and varieties, and with that recognised law of progress by which specialties of organisation are evolved, or differentiated, to use a modern term, from more general forms. The latter hypothesis, ad- mitting neither of proof nor disproof, can only be met by presumptions founded on the seeming stability of the actual conditions of the earth (a supposition upon which both astronomy and geology throw some doubt), and on the great elevation of man above other animals in his mental nature, j ustifying the belief that in him the final design of the Creator, as regards the earth, has been fulfilled.^ Putting aside, however, these vague speculations, we recur to our main question, can the human race, as now constituted, and by its own intrinsic capacities for change and progress, raise itself to a higher level of intellectual and moral power than that now existing ? In seeking to answer this question we must once again refer to the inferior forms of life around us. The natural history of man cannot in truth be separated from theirs. One obvious fact here, and very im- portant to the argument, is the great and often lasting change produced in many of them by domestication and human instruction. Such changes, indeed, made more for man's sake than the animals', may be only partial and doubtful improvement upon the wild races. Even in the case of dogs — an instance always foremost in illustration — the canine republics of some Oriental ^ It is worthy of note that two writers, so little congruous in other ways as Locke and Bolingbroke, have each expressed the probability that created beings exist elsewhere of higher grade than man. The astrono* jiier may find sonje sanctioii of Ijis own for thi3 conception, PERFECTIBILITY OF MAN. 173 cities give curious proof of that native sagacity which man has elsewhere so largely appropriated to his own uses or pleasures. The effect of domestication, indeed, is chiefly that of altering the physical qualities of animals and adapting them to special purposes. But their peculiar instincts also, and those faculties of in- telhgence and feeling which bring them nearest to man, are susceptible of changes, propagated by generation, and often becoming permanent in the race — permanent at least as far as experience goes, for in no case can we be sure that a return to the primitive conditions of the animal might not restore more or less of the original type. To a certain extent, indeed, we know that this happens, but it is equally sure that in some animals the artifi.cial habits acquired become secondary in- stincts, modify the organs and functions, and per- petuate in the race the new quahties acquired. The obvious bearing of this on the case of man is open to one important exceptional remark. He alone is submitted to no superior being on the earth capable of thus controlling or perfecting his natural instincts, of cultivating Ms reason, or of creating new capacities and modes of action. As far as we can venture to interpret the design under which he exists, man, as a species, is left to the self-development of the faculties with which he is gifted — faculties varying widely in degree, but alike in quality throughout mankind — acting and acted upon by the accidents of the world without — submitted equally to physical conditions and social influences — subject, further, to congenital propensities and passions in the use or abuse of which hes the exaltation or 174 PERFECTIBILITY OF MAN. debasement of his being. We recognise these as the causes wliich, in their operation through ages, have dis- severed mankind into races and nations, as well as into the subordhiate communities and classes — civilised, semi-civilised, or savage — which cover the globe. Eecurring to the main question, a special enquiry first presents itself. We see how much has been done by a system of selection and interbreeding in variously modifying and improving the breeds of many other animals, giving new power as well as direction to their original faculties.^ Can similar methods be applied to man with any similar result ? This, with a few partial and insignificant exceptions, has never yet been at- tempted, and the social and sexual relations, even among the least civilised people, make it very unlikely that it should ever fairly be carried into effect. Plato, in his Eepublic, propounds a scheme for giving the state control and direction of marriages as a means of social advancement ; and the austere laws of Sparta, by their ypa^r) KaKoyajxov^ and ypa(f>rj oxjjiyaixov^ assumed a right to the practical use of this power. But any such theories or enactments, based on the narrow scale of Greek republics, are of little present import. We might, indeed, in pure speculation suppose the experi- ment of grouping marriages (excluding close consan- ^ Thorouglibred racers furnish an instance in point. The winners descended from Eclipse were reckoned at 334. From other famous horses a still greater number. On this subject of congenital propensities we are bound to take large numerical views, illustrations, and averages, such as Humboldt applied to physical geography, and Liebig to other physical phenomena. The average amount of insanity, for instance, as far as it can be derived from authentic documents, &c. PERFECTIBILITY OF MAX. 175 guinity), so as to bring into union, through one or more generations, certain special qualities eminent in kind or degree, and including mental as well as bodily endow- ments. As the experiment may probably never be made, it is useless, if not impossible, to conjecture its results — whether the progeny of such conjunctions would be prodigies of excellence or of defects. I mention the latter contingency because what we call genius has for the most part a certain kindred with aberration of mind ; and because we are yet ignorant of those laws of generation and hereditary affinity on which are founded family character, and on a wider scale the character of communities and races. To seek for definite results from the blending of mental qualities by inheritance would be working with untried tools or materials too fine and fugitive for experiment. Putting aside this speculative form of our enquiry, we recur to it under that larger aspect which makes the past history of mankind the interpreter of the possible or probable future. But here, again, under this phrase of the past history of man, how vague from its com- plexity is all we bring into the argument ! Who can define or describe this history even on a single region of the earth's surface, seeing that in every region of which we have historical record changes have been unceasingly in progress, in some cases raising man in the scale of civilisation, in others degrading him to a lower level of life ? These changes and relative condi- tions are manifestly of supreme interest in a question where the extremes are so widely apart ; where we have to compare the Hottentots and Bushmen, the 176 PERFECTIBILITY OF MAN, Puegians, the Andaman Islanders and Esquimaux, &c., with the cultivated people of classical antiquity, or with the higher culture of some of the nations of our own time. Can we in changes of physical condition and other natural accidents find explanation of those vast diversities growing out of a single stock of human existence — diversities of human culture which time has brought about in the same regions and even among the same races of men ? To meet questions lil^e these we are forced back in speculation on the grade and condition of that primitive people on the earth from which all others have their presumed descent. Here written history is a blank, traditions are wrapt in mist, and our sole reading is in those rude sepulchres of caves and tumuli which have disclosed to us the admixture of human remains with those of animals now extinct on the globe, the present congeners of which dwell in climates and countries far distant from these places of entombment. Such re- searches are yet in their infancy, going little beyond a few detached spots on the face of the earth. Who can conjecture the results of future discovery, es- pecially in those regions of Asia the seats of the oldest empires, as well as of those nomadic races which poured themselves westwards to subdue and occupy what are now the most civiHsed parts of the world ? The inference from the discoveries first denoted is that of rude tribes of men, generally of a lower anatomical type, rudely implemented, but showing in succession, on the same soil, a progress in those arts and means which serve to human subsistence. The successive ages, or PERFECTIBILITY OF MAN. 177 what seem such, of stone, bronze, and iron imple- ments, are the interpreters to us of this progress. It may be that these are but the memorials of insulated races, separated and degraded from a higher primitive stock. Time and wider research can alone solve this question. We are unravelling the Assyrian, Babylonian, and Persian histories by sculptured monuments and cuneiform writings, and the caves and mounds of these countries may afford us hereafter the record of still earher times and races of men. Without venturing to affirm the result, it is probable that this path of enquiry will lead us here also only into a ruder form of humanity, and that our knowledge will never go beyond this point. Another path, however, is open, more easy and familiar than that just denoted. Still seeking to reach the future through the past, but under less obscure con- ditions, the comparison at once suggests itself between the attainments of the highest civihsation of antiquity and those of the age in which we live. We cannot, indeed, carry this comparison authentically farther than to Greek and Koman antiquity. Egypt and the great Asiatic empires have left us marvellous monuments of older date ; but their semi-civihsation was either arrested or degraded by time, or by the influx of more barbarous races, obliterating the advances that had been anteriorly made. A comparison between ancients and moderns can- not, however, come within the narrow compass as- sumed by Sir W. Temple, Bentley, and Boyle in their angry controversy. It is difficult, indeed, to bring N 178 PERFECTIBILITY OF MAN. moral conditions into tlie question at all, seeing how large and vague is tlie term. But the intellectual re- lations may be better defined and understood; and taking this phrase in its widest sense, the comparison comes to an instant issue. It cannot be doubted that the powers as well as attainments of certain European peoples in our own age have reached a higher grade than those of any other time or people in the anterior history of the world. We may hesitate in giving pre- cise dates to the periods of progress. Hallam has called the seventh century the nadir of European civilisation, while Leibnitz has noted the thirteenth as singularly barren of intellectual culture. But all doubt ceases when we come to the intellectual history of the last three centuries, and especially of the century now in progress — one marked by rapid achievements of dis- covery, invention, thought, and action which will designate it to all posterity. The advancement of physical science stands foremost in the picture, at- tested by the wonderful discoveries of our own time, and in the nature as well as number of these discoveries denoting those higher qualities of intellect to which they are due. The logic of every branch of knowledge has become more strict, the demand for truth and exactness in all results more absolute. Together with a greater perfection of methods, more profound thoughts and higher generahsations have been apphed to those mys- teries of the universe, the power of apprehending which, even partially, is the especial faculty and glory of man. It is impossible to read the writings of the ancient philosophers, even of those who saw farthest PEEFECTIBILITY OF MAN. 179 into these things, without recognising the changes that have progressively come over the human mind — changes not hmited to the physical sciences, but ex- tending to all other branches of human knowledge. Germs of thought and speculation which failed to ripen in the philosophy of older times have now matured into established truths. What were conjec- tures have become laws, and it is in the discovery of these laws that we obtain evidence of the highest capacities of man. Some sciences, indeed, such as political economy and social statistics, are almost alto- gether of recent creation ; and seeing their importance to the welfare of mankind, they interpret well that conjoint progress of thought and action which has done so much to extend and define the civilisation of our own age. Admitting, however, this progress and higher grade of culture in certain communities of men, we have yet to see what proportion these bear to the totahty of mankind. Neither geography nor arithmetic can be brought to solve a problem thus complex. The areas of higher and lower civilisation are every- where so crossed and intermingled that, even in the countries most familiar to us, lines and numbers fail of affording any certain demarcation. Looking largely over the globe, and especially what is called the Old World, we find some of the most populous nations seemingly arrested at a certain point of progress, and going through ages in succession without notable advancement, often with obvious decHne. . Ancient philosophy or poetry fondled the notion of a primi- N 2 ' 180 PERFECTIBILITY OF UA^. tive purity, a golden age, of man, sullied and defaced in later times. But history, as we have seen, is silent or speaks only in fables of these earlier epochs of man- kind. What it tells us gives no measure of time, or knowledge of what was human life, in the long ante- cedent void. These considerations give more definite shape to the questions before us: How far may the advance- ment of a portion of mankind be carried by ulterior progress? And how may such advancement be ex- tended over the entire earth and to all races of men ? Taking the latter and wider question first, one conclu- sion speedily presents itself, viz., that all future pro- gress in mental culture and civilisation of the great masses of mankind — whether defined as races, nations, or classes of men — must for the future come by diffu- sion from those points or centres where the torch of a brighter humanity is abeady kindled and ready to cast its light around. That there are many dark lines mingled in this light may well be confessed. But it is nevertheless the source whence the larger civihsation of the world must come, accelerated and assured by those recent acquisitions of power which are due to the science of our day. The steam-engine, on land and sea, has broken through all the barriers which formerly divided and dissevered nations. When we can send a message across the Atlantic in a few seconds, by an agent scarcely known two centuries ago, it may well be felt that all old reckonings of time and distance are gone by, and that the future state of the world will be subject to conditions veiy different from those of the past. PERFECTIBILITY OP MAN. 181 Such changes are rapidly going on under our eyes. They all tend, directly or indirectly, to the greater unity of mankind — to the assimilation of lan- guages, modes of government, knowledge and arts, and the habits of personal and social hfe, among peoples widely separated though all prior ages. Taking fair measure of time into the account (and of the future duration of time on the earth we are as ignorant as of the past), we may securely ajQ&rm that the total aspect of human hfe will be altered over the globe. Important questions arise how far this assimi- lation of races over the globe may not, for a time at least, lower the human scale in some of its attributes. Look at the changes going on at this time in the an- cient empires of India, China, Egj^t, and Japan — at the rapid, perhaps precocious, growth of populous communities transplanted from the Old World to the prairies and forests of the Indians in North America, or to the lands of the ruder savages of Australia, both the destined centres of a new and wide civilisation. It is a revolution of centuries accomplished within the existing generation of man. The slave-trade has been happily displaced by a trade in free emigrants, seeking to find in these new regions more space and scope than the Old World can afford them. Glancing on the globe at the position and petty surface of our own island, it may well seem marvellous that this single nation (the ultimi orbis Britanni) should have played so dominant a part in the mighty changes now in progress. Milton speaks of ' England's precedence in teaching nations how to hve.' If the phrase were true for his time, how much more is it for our own I 182 PERFECTIBILITY OF MAN. The conclusion we have reached, that the elevation of the species must be derived chiefly from the higher civilisations already partially attained, suggests at once the question, how may the flow from this fountain be itself rendered more abundant and pure ? How may the import of the very word Civilisation be raised, by its being associated in the future with higher faculties of intellect and moral feehng ? The question, thus shaped, is one abounding in curious speculation and of deep interest. Admitting the capacity for higher development, which among the faculties bestowed on man are most susceptible of such elevation ? Here the answer may best be, those which in degree, if not in kind, most markedly distinguish him from the brute creation. The senses of sight, hearing, and touch, which mainly connect man with the external world, are severally possessed by many other animals in greater perfection of natural sensibihty, but without the capacity for that augmentation of power which human genius has given to these senses, and to that of vision more especially. The outer form, and those internal organs on which man's life depends, are probably susceptible of little farther change, from those incidents of soil, climate, food, and social condition, which have created and defined the actual communities of mankind. It is to the brain, as the instrumental minister of mind, that we must look, if admitting a material cause for the advancement of man in the scale of being. A free admission of ignorance as to all that concerns the proximate relations of matter and mind exempts us from dealing here with this long-liti- gated question. What physiology and comparative PERFECTIBILITY OF IL\N, 183 anatomy call upon us to believe is, that the brain, in its size and weight, in the proportion of its parts, and in other specialties of structure, does — we know not how or why — correspond with and in some sort de- note the capacities of mind of which it is the instru- ment. Many exceptions and anomalies there are, and these wrapped in the same mystery as the normal relations of elements so entirely incongruous to our conceptions, yet so inseparable in our present existence. In this failure of all interpretation we are forced to acquiesce. We must, therefore, not too keenly speculate on the manner and proportion in which the mind and the material organ may respectively contribute to the de- velopment of higher powers. The argument before us rests upon the assumed facts, that there are notable differences in the brain as regards volume and other structiural peculiarities — that these differences have some connexion, however inexpHcable, with the kind and degree of the mental endowments — and that they can be extended and perpetuated by inheritance, so as to characterise not only individuals but whole races of mankind. The different forms and capacity of the skull in different races have been carefully examined, and they accord well with the relations just denoted.^ Human design has had little or nothing to do with these results. But in their existence itself we have the proof of an aptitude for change which, even apart from * It is the view of Herbert Spencer (in contradistinction to the doctrine of Kant, regarding innate perceptions or ideas), that the constitution of our minds is wholly derived from experience — not individual experience solely, but the accumulated experience of our ancestors transmitted to us hereditarily/. 184 PERFECTIBILITY OF MAJ^. any direct purpose or intervention, may issue hereafter in higher degrees of mental attainment — in greater vigour of the faculties generally, as well as of those special qualities and those felicities of genius which in every age seem to have carried some men beyond the sphere of their common humanity. The occurrence of the latter instances, though they come in strong con- trast to the mediocrity or abasement characterising the mass of mankind, gives proof of capacities belong- ing to the species as such, from which we may augur, under new conditions, its future and more general elevation. In pursuing the argument, however, we must not analyse too minutely those various faculties of percep- tion, intellect, feeling, and will, to which we give unity under the name of Mind ; nor those innate individual propensities (aberrent they may often be called) on which the phrenologists dwell in evidence of their doc- trine, and which, whencesoever derived, are elements both in the highest elevation and greatest abasement of man. Here, more especially, we encounter those mys- terious problems regarding generation and inheritance which are of such deep concernment in this as in other questions now under active discussion. Science is still working outside these problems. If it should ever go deeper into them, the question as to the future perfecti- bility of man might gather some special evidence or presumption from this source. As it is we must be content in coming to a general conclusion on the general grounds already denoted. These reasons, however short of absolute proof, are PERFECTIBILITY OF MAN. 185 fully sufficient to convince my own mind of a futurity to man on earth more exalted than his present condi- tion here. Inequalities, vast and various, there must ever be, from the necessities of human existence, but the grade of the species may be raised. Admission being made of the capacity for change, and this with- out any known limit of amount, the argument recurs for illustration to the comparison of what is with what has been, and the inference from this as to the possible or probable future. It is a subject fitter for a volume than a loose essay. I will merely remark here, that had there been any prior type of civilisation higher than that of Greece and Eome, it must inevitably have left its marks behind. We may take this grade of mental culture, then, though deficient in some arts and inventions which even China and India had attained, as the highest of the ancient world. But, however re- markable in many ways, it had not vigour enough to perpetuate itself, when brought into conflict with abuses from within and barbarian pressure from with- out. A long series of dark centuries intervened be- tween this era and that of modern civilisation, during which period Christianity itself, in its creeds, acts, and usages, was degraded to a level little above that of the feudal barbarism co-existing with it. Such degradation as that of the Dark Ages in Europe can never occur again. The present areas of high civilisation, though still limited in extent, and de- faced by many dark shades, are not exposed to the dangers just denoted. They cannot again be overrun by ruder races from without ; and any internal changes, 186 PERFECTIBILITY OF MAN. especially in countries where the present maximum of elevation has not yet been reached, are much more likely to result in ulterior progress than in decay. Add to this the wonderful powers, won by man from nature, for rapid diffusion over the globe of the attain- ments hitherto limited to certain detached regions only, and we may fairly rest in the conclusion that the human race has a higher destiny before it than the perpetuation of its present estate. I must admit, however, that the argument thus far regards chiefly the intellectual advancement of man, and the means serving to this great end. His moral and social progress in the future is a matter of at least equal concern — a topic closely alhed, indeed, to the former, but rendered still more difficult of discussion by the ambiguities of language and the more complex evidence with which we have to deal in comparing the moral condition of ancient periods and countries with that of the world in our own time. To what common formula or phraseology can we reduce elements so diverse and so difficult of interpretation, even where most familiar to us ? There is, indeed, a certain com- munity of character in mankind, derived from a com- mon nature, and from those necessities of hfe which press ahke upon all. But this is overlaid by so many specialties, physical, local, and accidental, that we can seldom compass any complete or certain conclusions. Take even Eome as an instance. From history, poetry, and satire we know its social condition under the early Emperors better than that of any other ancient city. Yet how vague our comparison, in a moral sense, of PERFECTIBILITY OF MAN. 187 the mass of this population with that of a modern capital ! And, if reaching any plausible conclusion as to cities, how little does this tell us of the multitudes peopling the empires and kingdoms to which these cities belong! Such comparisons, apphed either to different ages or to different countries and races of men, rest much on ill-defined words and phrases, and afford Httle assurance of truth. The vocabulary of the most abstruse physical science is simple compared with that of moral and social philosophy. Allowing, however, for all these ambiguities, we cannot doubt the well-proved fact that the moral and social character of a people, taking these terms in their highest and clearest sense, may be greatly and last- ingly elevated by the concurrent influence of good laws and government, of religion and education truthfully and wisely administered. While in every case the actual attainment is far below theoretic perfection, the existence of such attainment becomes a pledge for progress beyond. Even taste, ' that delicate and aerial faculty which can scarcely endure the chains of a de- finition,' may well be supposed capable, if not of higher powers, yet certainly of so much larger diffusion as to give fi:esh life and refinement to those moral conditions with which it is always closely associated. History furnishes no such pregnant example of the change in question as that already referred to, viz., the contrast between the last three centuries, during which Western Europe has ripened into its actual civilisation, and the thousand years directly preceding them. Many single stars are seen through this long gloom of ages 188 PERFECTIBILITY OF MAN. ^-men such as Alfred, Bede, Anselm, Abelard, Eoger Bacon, Aquinas, Dante, and Wickliffe — who rose above their time in moral and intellectual power. But the dark picture of so many centuries is little illumined by these flitting lights. Its true colouring is that of bar- barian inroads on a tottering and vicious Empire — of feudal tyrannies — of ecclesiastical superstitions or frauds — of the selfish austerities or more secret evils of the monastic hfe — of persecution in its worst shapes — and of a general ignorance and credulity ofiering itself an easy prey to these incumbent evils. The fictions of an age of chivalry and of mediseval learning have passed away, and we can happily bring these thousand years of darkness into strong contrast with the social as well as intellectual state since attained. I wiUingly employ the word Humanity, in its largest sense, to de- note that which has been the subject and substance of the change which has thus supervened. And one chief mark or test of this change among civiUsed nations is the more zealous effort, on principle^ to reform old errors and abuses by annulling or mitigating the laws, customs, and creeds in which they have come down to us. There is cause for some pride in afiirming that England furnishes the fairest example of efforts thus directed to the abolition of old abuses and towards a higher future. The actual moral evils in the world are such, how- ever, and so many, that time must be taken largely into our calculations of this future. Some of these evils can hardly be detached from the necessities of existence, as they affect the bulk of mankind ; but PERFECTIBILITY OF MAN. 189 there are others which happier ages may mitigate, if they cannot altogether annul. Of these war stands first and foremost — an anomaly it might well be called, were it not that the pages of all history are sullied with its records, from the earliest time down to our own day, among the most civilised and religious as well as most savage races of men. When and how is this blemish upon humanity to be efiaced? Our actual civilisation, as we see, has failed to effect it. Is there any higher grade attainable by man which may meet this great requirement? I would fain believe that there is such — to be reached through the progress of the moral and intellectual faculties, and itself furnish- ing the best test and happiest result of this progress. Ages may pass beforehand, but it is hardly credible that the time should not come when this dark stain will be removed from the history of mankind. 190 INFINITY— ETEBNITY^THE UNTHINKABLE. Three words of great import in every sense, and having a common relation to the most profound objects of human thought ! It is a German poet who some- where prays to be saved from the harassing notion of Infinity, and not without cause for the wish, since the fact or idea expressed by this single word marks the barrier before which reason recoils in awe and despair. Whether space, time, or number be concerned, an argument trenching on this attribute of infinity is at once arrested, and no subtlety of words or thought can carry it farther. The phraseology of common speech, and even of grav^ doctrine, does indeed often employ the word, but in some cases mischievously, and never with any reality to the understanding. It is one of the tests of true philosophy to know when this barrier of the Infinite has been reached. Between the infinitely great and the infinitely small — the celestial distances and magnitudes, and the atoms and atomical actions of matter — we stand on a middle ground, closed at each end, yet spacious enough for the largest intellect and genius to work in. Then again as to time. The moment of present being lies between the infinite past and the infinite future — equi- distant from both in the sole sense we can give to what INFINITY — ETERNITY — ^THE UNTHINKABLE. 191 has no conceivable limit behind or before us. Eternity, indeed, has become almost exclusively a theological term, to which few can, or dare, attach its full meaning. It is a word of solemn sound, but barren to the under- standing — ' a negative idea clothed with a positive name.' Numbers, in expressing the quantities and relations of space, motion, and time, as well as the atomic constitution of matter, carry us far into the depths where thought finally loses itself in the infinite. How- ever starthng, and to many incredible, the arrays of figures through which science now expounds the great phenomena of nature, these are really the methods which distinguish and protect truth from ignorant and idle speculation. What can be translated into and checked by arithmetic is generally a sound conclu- sion, whatever the amount of numbers concerned. Such figures, indeed, sometimes carry certainty so far beyond the reach of conception that the term Infinite seems justifiably apphed to what is in reality but a step towards it. The mathematician, through his peculiar method of interrogating nature, attains some results which no observation or experiment can reach, and often touches on those terminal points where an Infinite in the series stops all progress beyond. Those ultimate ratios, which Berkeley calls 'the ghosts of departed quantities,' approach the depths of the infinite, but halt on the brink. The controversies as to motion in the abstract — a dispute stretching from the age of Zeno and Aristotle to that of Newton and Boyle — and the kindred ques- 192 INFINITY — ETERNITY— THE UNTHINKABLE. tion regarding force, similarly unconditional, well illustrate these subtle methods of seeking ingress into the innermost secrets of nature. With the ancient philosophers all this was a sort of intellectual disport- ment. In our day the progress of more exact science, both by experiment and observation, has brought us into direct contact with these problems, and very especially with that which regards the origin and nature of force — of that invisible but momentous power or powers on v/hich depend alike the great motions of the universe and the most minute atomic or molecular actions of matter itself But here, again, human thought has hitherto been baffled in its struggle with the inscrutable ; and where not ending with a reductio ad ahsurdum has been compelled to halt upon sub- ordinate laws, and terms provisional only, to express the unknown that hes beyond. The word Unthinkable has been well applied of late to denote some of the objects and speculations of which I have been speaking. Another phrase, familiar from recent controversy, shows the fashion of language still employed to veil our ignorance. This is the Uncon- ditioned Absolute, a cumbrous conjunction of words, whether theologically or otherwise apphed, and ex- pressing no truth which a simpler phrase might not have conveyed.^ To go thus back to the scholastic ' Sir W. Hamilton has sought to give the character of a ' law of mind ' to these relations of the intellect with the conceivable or condi- tioned, and the incmiceivable or unconditioned. The infinite and absolute come under the latter head as unthinkable to our reason. Admitting the distinction, it adds but little to what we knew before. INFINITY — ETERNITY — ^THE UNTHINKABLE. 193 ages for the phraseology as well as substance of an argument, is a poor homage to the ampler and more exact knowledge of our own time. Lofty though the aspirations of physical science now are, they more readily recognise and acquiesce in the limitations im- posed upon them, than do those metaphysical theories, German or English, which end but in a labyrinth of words. Yet when thus speaking of the practical Umits of human knowledge — of those points in every science where the infinite and unthinkable come in — we must not deny the existence of ulterior truths — felt to be such, though not comprehensible by reason. There is more than mere paradox' in the saying of a French philosopher : ' La, oil finit le raisonnement, commence la veritable certitude ; ' and Pascal lucidly, as always, illustrates the impotence of reason to reach a truth which must nevertheless be such.^ What we feel as wholly beyond the scope of thought does not lose its reality by being so. Taking an instance just alluded to, we can affirm that God Z5, though we know not how or what He is. This ignorance, in fact, is denoted by the very terms we use to express our adoration of the Supreme Being. The words Infinite, Immortal, Immense, Invisible, Incorporeal, Absolute, &c., do not assert what is, but what is not. I have just turned up * Pascal says that we neither conceive a line divided by an infinite number of bisections, nor a section that cannot be divided ; but though these contraries are both inconceivable, one of them must necessarily be true. 194 IXFINITY — ETERNITY — THE UNTHINKABLE. ill Photius a series of epithets similarly applied— to acrcofxaTOv^ to aoparov^ ro airXovv^ to acr^iiaTicTTOVy &c. It is what Mr. Mill somewhere calls 'a fasciculus of negations/ but negations commonly understood in a positive sense. 195 NATURAL THEOLOGY. All natural reason and feeling, and all controversies regarding the Deity, however disguised by words, in- volve two distinct views, viz., that which regards him as everywhere and at all times present, and acting in all events ; and secondly, that which regards him as personally or undividedly apart from those great laws of universal nature which he primarily designed and rendered active by his power. But here, as in many other matters beyond our senses and reason, what are apparent opposites closely approach each other. ^ The Deity, present and acting throughout all nature, becomes in effect the general law. The general law, regarded in the sense of a fixed and perpetual operation, usurps the place of the Creator. The approximation here expresses the diffi- culty, ever found, of escaping some form of pantheism, when seeking to scale this high problem by reason alone. Scrutinise severally the orthodox terms of Omniscience, Omnipresence, and Omnipotence, and you feel yourself brought to the edge of the abyss denoted by this single word. Oriental philosophy, and that of the classical ages, came upon pantheism by the ' ^Les extr^mit^s se touclient, et se r<5unissent a force de s'etre ^loign^es, et se retrouvent en Dieu et en Dieu seulement.' — Pascal. 2 196 NATURAL THEOLOGY. same paths of thought which had led Spinoza, Goethe, and others of later time to the same general issue ; any seeming variations being due either to ambiguities of language or to the mental temperament of the en- quirer. When, for instance, we take up Goethe's writ- ings we find him pressing on to his pantheistic conclu- sion with a power and poetry of language which entangle his reason, and almost disguise his conclu- sions from himself. Even Newton, in a paragraph of his own handwriting which I have seen, gives expres- sion to what must be declared a pantheistic view of the nature of the Deity ; though elsewhere sohcitous to avoid a conclusion which Cudworth not inaptly terms ' the deifying the nature of things,' and which, by what- ever path arrived at, leaves the mind in an impene- trable labyrinth of its own creation. I do not know any attainment of natural theology in our own time, either by abstract reasoning or induc- tive evidence, which has not been in some way pre- ceded and prefaced by those who have thought or written in ages gone by. Dryden asks, in his ' Eeligio Laici ' — Ciinst thou by reason more of Godhead know Than Plutarch, Seneca, or Cicero ? And but for the limitation of verse he might have added the great names of Plato and Aristotle ; and among Eoman writers those especially of Lucretius and PHny, who in one way or other exhaust every concep- tion which human reason can apply to the Divinity above it. We have various references to the same theme as handled by the earliest Greek philosophers, NATURAL THEOLOGY. 197 the ol 7rp6(T0€u tjijlcjp of whom Plato speaks, as recog- nising a supreme Novs koL ^povrjo-i^ governing through- out the universe. The same behef, as is well known, has been handed down, under more vague or distorted forms, from the remote antiquity of all the great Ori- ental races. The Egyptians, though like other astro- laters locating their Supreme Power in the sun, yet held that this embodiment was assumed by his own volition. Among the savage races over the earth the same conception exists of a Supreme Being, however rudely material the expression given to it. We might expect all this to be so. Apart from all revelation, the general conception of a Deity,^however modified in details, springs from sources common to every race of men in every age, viz., the need, as it may well be termed, of conceiving some Intelhgence and Power distinct from and above our own ; and the proofs from design or adaptation throughout the world that to this Intelhgent Power belongs the work of crea- tion and the maintenance of things made. If these conceptions are ever annulled it must be by the arti- fices of metaphysical language, and not by any realities of thought. Without dwelling on Warburton's opinion (a very doubtful one), that the greater Elusiuian Mysteries taught expressly the unity of God, or quoting from Cudworth's vast body of authorities on the subject, it is enough to say generally of the great Greek and Latin writers that they rarely use other than the sin- gular number when speaking explicitly of the existence and attributes of Divine Power. Polytheism is cast 198 NATURAL THEOLOGY. aside in such cases almost without comment or re- morse. In notes I have made of the more striking passages bearing on this point I find few exceptions to the remark. Aristotle's expression of unity is espe- cially simple and distinct — Eh 8e toV, ttoXuw^u/aos ecm ; and as far as I recollect he hardly ever speaks of the heathen deities by name. Seneca, whose power of deep thought has been somewhat hidden under affecta- tions of his style, expresses the same idea. Even where the plural is used in such discussions the tendency is often to a singular meaning, or the two forms are in- differently mixed, as in the ' Tiraeeus ' of Plato, who makes his Zevs almost synonymous with cause or mind.^ The dramatists and poets, for obvious reasons of art, speak more as polytheists, yet we read in Pindar of the mysterious rig, supreme in the government of the world ; and ^schylus shadows forth the conception of a higher being than the Zeus who chained Prome- theus to the rock. The Homeric Zeus has itself formed the theme of a learned work in Germany.^ But, as regards the polytheism of the ancients, it must ever be kept in mind that it comes to us mainly through the medium of poetry, which filled up and coloured the wandering traditions of different races of men, giving them an embodiment whicli the philosophy even of that time refused to recognise. Earely, if ever, do we find the sentiment of real ' I fear it must be said that the most learned commentaries on Plato (and no heathen author has been so sedulously scrutinised for his mean- ings) have failed to decipher his entire opinions on this subject. Take passages in the l'ATUBAL THEOLOGY. controversies and creeds of the early Christian Churches have led to a more obscure and unsettled conception of the Deity than we find in some of these great heathen writers. The old and vehement disputes concerning the nature of the Trinity, though now for a time sunk into silence amidst other controversies, were yet still rife in my younger days, and but two centuries ago called for the interposition of the sovereign to arrest the angry argument of two of our most eminent divines. The metaphysical or a 'priori proof of a Deity, variously attempted at successive times, is felt more as an exercise of logic than a conclusion of the reason. The speculations of Proclus and the neo-Platonists in the nature of the Supreme Being, repeated in modern phrase by Hegel and others of his school, leave the question in the obscurity from which they profess to withdraw it.^ The schoolmen of the dark ages be- stowed their logical subtleties on the subject without solving any of its difficulties. Archbishop Anselm is perhaps the one who has left the deepest mark of his genius upon it. The axiom in his Prologium, that the idea of God in the mind of man is in itself an irrefra- gable proof of his existence, descended in succession to Descartes and Leibnitz, and has given foundation to the belief of many men of lesser note in the world. The labours of Dr. S. Clark on this subject are well-nigh forgotten. ^ There is more wisdom, because more candid confession of ignorance, in the words of St. Augustine : *■ Verius cogitatur Deus quam dicitur, verius est quam cogitatur.' Sir I. Newton's expression, *■ Non est seternitas, sed setemus et infinitus ; non est duratio et spatium, sed durat et adest,' escapes pantheism by giving personality. J^ATURAL THEOLOGY. 201 But after all no reference to ancient opinions, nor any mere abstract propositions, can satisfy that craving of the mind for greater certainty which this question begets. The only safe and solid foundation of natural theology is happily the simplest and easiest of attain- ment ; that is, a conviction of the personality or indi- viduahty of the Deity, and of design in the creation. These are the points (in themselves inseparably allied) of highest concernment to man. What we seek for is the proof of an individual being, who has designed what we see in the world around us, and carried these designs into effect, either by specific acts of creation or by the mediate action of powers and laws directed to their end. The ' natura naturans' of certain authors satisfies no conception, intellectual or moral. The phrase of Natural Law is a barren one, unless annexed to the idea of a legislator ; and to bring in the word Nature as fulfilling this idea is but a recoil of language upon itself. In reasoning on the personal unity of God, as attested and represented by the unity of crea- tion, we gain, it is true, no comprehension of his nature or mode of existence. The absolute unconditioned and other such phrases are words and not meanings, and bring at most only negative conclusions to the mind. But the individuality of God — and I think this a better term than personality — can be comprehended as a sub- ject of thought. And when this conviction is gained through the evidences of design, as contrasted with chance — ^for this is the real point in question — ^it fur- nishes the nearest approach which simple reason can make to this great mystery of the universe. 202 NATURAL THEOLOGY. Duly apprehending, then, these conditions of the problem, we come finally to such evidences as the true, if not sole, basis of natural theology — the argument of every age and race of mankind. Will to design and power to execute are the conceptions which belong to the natural belief in God, under every form which religion has assumed. For religion, however distorted by human formularies, can only rightly be defined as the relation of man to his Creator, under the actual conditions of this life and the contingencies of a future. Sir J. Herschel uses the term of a Personal Will, and in many parts of his admirable writings dwells upon the conception of such personal will as concerned in all the great works of nature. Through the admission of a system of secondary laws we may keep this conception asunder from that pantheism in which, as we see, so many hypotheses have merged. Arguments and proofs of design spun out through volumes (as in the ' Bridgewater Treatises') are of less practical value than a few cogent cases, ready at hand, certain in conclusion, and easily understood. It is a common fault in this, as in other like questions, to seek to strengthen proof by multiplying instances, without regard to their relative weight. The force of the im- pression is thereby lessened, and the thought led to wander from that which is more certain to that which is less so. I think it is Swift who says : ' An idle reason weakens the weight of good ones given before.' Let a man have in hand two or three well-assured instances, such as no doubt can disturb, and he is prepared at NATURAL THEOLOGY. 203 every moment to renew and fortify the convictions lie has once attained. Of the various forms this argument from design has assumed I still think that of Paley the best, from the lucid manner in which he makes his illustrations serve to establish the personality of the Creator and his unity in creation. He happily expresses in a few words the conclusion attained : ' I desire no greater certainty in reasoning than that by which chance is excluded from the present disposition of the material world.' There are those of the present day who deprecate the looking after final causes^ and bring the epithet of Lord Bacon to justify their distrust. I myself could wish the phrase changed for one more simply suggest- ing intention or design. But, be the wording what it may, the meaning is one which cannot be discarded. The idea involved has often been ignorantly or pre- sumptuously applied, but this does not annul its reality as a great elementary truth attainable by our reason. And it may be added in this instance that one case well proved becomes the interpreter and proof of a thousand. Seeking for the best example of such instantice crucis as I have suggested for use, the eye at once offers itself — famihar as an illustration, yet not to be despised on that account, nor because it needs some understanding of this wonderful organ, well described as ' equal in force to many volumes of theology.' The perfect adaptation of a most complex structure to the not less complex properties of light is so complete in 204 NATUKAL THEOLOGY. its proof of design to form and power to execute^ that to dispute the condusion is to give up the office of reason. Or, Hmit the case to the passage of hght through the crystalhne lens only, and to the effect of its singular structure in rectifying vision, and the argu- ment even gains in force by its simplicity. Some have sought to impugn the perfectness of the organ ; but even had they not been answered by Brewster and Hehn- holtz, the conclusion would not have lost its validity. Were we able to interpret equally the delicate and complex parts of the internal ear, the evidence of de- sign here would doubtless be no less cogent. In truth, the four little bones of the tympanum, ignorant though we are of the specialties of their use, do yet in their pecuharities of position and connexion as clearly denote design, and design fulfilled, as if the purpose of each was written out distinctly before us. Chance could not have placed them there. In these instances, in- deed, as more distinctly in many others, we may notice certain approximations in series from lower grades of life, and in the case of the eye certain incidental varia- tions which seem to be transmissible by inheritance. But still these things, carefully attested, cannot annul the conclusion, founded explicitly upon adaptation of structure to the complex laws of light and sound, that these organs are fashioned by design, and are not the result of casual conformation or of any selective power inherent in the creatures thus endowed. Whether the expression be illogical or not, I would cite the eye as an instance where all reason merges at once in a cer- tain and inevitable conclusion. NATURAL THEOLOGY. 205 The whole physiology of animal life abounds in such instances (especially the specific secretions oi special organs) fitted to be thus used. But what I here seek to press is the storing up of a few the most instant and certain in conclusion. The various ills and turmoils of life, as well as the vagaries of human thought, require that the convictions so obtained should be often and easily renewed. No form of religion but must gain by that natural theology which can be brought home to the acts and duties of daily life. Laborious treatises, if read, are speedily forgotten. We want instances which no argument can disturb or gainsay ; and a few such become the interpreters of a multitude of others more obscure to our limited view. In the foregoing pages I have treated of natural theology chiefly as regards the existence and indivi- duahty of a Supreme Being, the designer and potentially the author of the works of creation we see around us. Of the moral attributes of the Deity, as they have been somewhat presumptuously called, I do not speak here, thinking on various accounts that this topic, when ven- tured upon at all, comes better apart from and in sequel to the other. One remark only I would make, having relation to both, viz., that the argument for design from organic structure is in nowise vitiated by defects in such structures arising from accident or natural decay. These must be held as parts of a larger scheme, w^hich our imperfect conception of the intents and methods of creation prevents us from approaching even by the boldest natural hypo- thesis. 206 MATERIALISM AS A QUESTION OF SCIENCE AND PHILOSOPHY, What more can be said on this question than has heretofore been said? The arguments of the mate- riahst are essentially the same, whencesoever derived or however worded. Their truth can never be proved, nor absolutely disproved — in other words, they cannot logically be disproved, because they are incapable of proof. You may refine ad infinitum upon material structure and the forces affecting it, and indicate new relations of these to the functions and faculties of mind, without advancing one step to the real solution of the problem. The old questions still start up : What more do we know of matter than of spirit? May not the qualities, so-called, of matter have their reahty in mental consciousness only? That such questions have been asked and vindicated is the best proof that human reason is unable to encounter them in this ultimate form. Still it is well to simplify the reasonings which thus end in a confession of ignorance. They have been so far entangled in the fluctuating language of different ages and schools, that some care is needed to keep the argument and conclusion fairly in sight. Even now new terms come in quick succession to perplex the questions which two or three centuries ago Descartes, • :matekialism. 207 Stahl, and Leibnitz took up in their own phraseology in succession to that of more ancient philosophers.^ The materiahst argues, and justly as to fact, that the mind and its functions grow together with the growth and structural changes of the body, from in- fancy up to maturity — that old age brings on, though less definitely as to time, the decay of both — that in all stages of life the phenomena of sleep and dreams, of idiocy and insanity, of dehrium and drunkenness, of apoplexy and fainting, and the other various forms and accidents of cerebral disorder — all show a direct and indispensable relation of the brain and nervous system to the intellectual and moral states of the man.^ Of the fact that no material change can occur in the nervous organisation without some correspond- ing change in the mental functions, the proofs are end- lessly furnished by the daily experience of life. Birth, dating even from the foetal state — death, at whatsoever age occurring — these seeming termini of our being are inteUigible to us only as parts of a present necessary co-existence and relation of body and mind. By no efibrt or artifice of thought can we dissociate these portions of our common nature, so as to feel or con- ceive what we call Mind singly in itself. The materialist finds a certain aid to his argument in the strange difierences of individual minds. The phrenologist may be wrong or ridiculous in his de- notation of these specialties of character, intellectual or * Germany furnishes the most explicitly avowed materialists of our day, in Yirchow, Vogt, and Moleschott. 2 A few lines of Lucretius^ in his third book, put clearly all that belongs to this argument. 208 MATERIALISM. moral. He may and does err in looking to the out- side of the cranium as the sure interpreter of the mental faculties and feelings lying underneath. But the fact remains untouched that there are wonderful innate diversities in all that constitutes the mental being of man — diversities in the kind and degree of intellect — diversities in the perfection of the senses, in memory, in the elements of taste, imagination, and genius — diversities not less strongly marked in those propensities and passions which define our moral nature. These differences are found in the highest mental qualities as well as in the lowest and basest. They are strikingly shown in the faculties which seem to involve a certain mechanism of action, as memory, the mathematical or numerical faculty, and those con- nected with the fine arts, music, painting, &c. As in the case of bodily resemblances, these mental idiosyn- crasies are often traceable to hereditary causes ; but where not obviously so, still they are innate. The question, however, remains unanswered : Are these diiferences due to different cerebral organisation? Or is this organisation but the instrument to express and put into action the diversities in a part of our being to which no material epithet or description can apply ? And this brings another physiological fact into the argument, viz., the greater development of the brain in man than in any other animal, and the proportion found generally to exist between the size, weight, and complexity of this organ and the perfection of intelli- gence and other mental endowments. That such re- MATERIALISM. 209 lations do exist, however imperfectly defined in their details, is well attested by observation. It is hard in such a case to accept quantity as a measure of quality^ yet we must needs do so under certain conditions. That there are tracts or local portions of the brain, with which the convolutions are perhaps most inti- mately concerned, having special connexion with dif- ferent faculties of the mind, can scarcely be denied, looking to the various physiological evidence for this fact. Even the faculty of speecli, on the evidence derived from its morbid changes, has lately been sub- mitted to this interpretation. But admitting to a cer- tain extent such localisation, we still are not beyond the threshold of the question, whence come and in what consist the endowments of thought and feeling as we see them in many animals, and supremely in man ? The question, then, however it be shaped, again forces itself forward : Do the facts which show that unceasing changes of mind are produced by material causes acting through material organs prove that such organisation is in itself capable of generating those wonderful functions of perception, thought, feeling, and volition which in their totality constitute the mind of man ? The answer to this question I think to be that no such proof is possible, and that presumption is wholly against it. That we cannot give other explanation of the phenomena is no argument, in a case where reason and consciousness are equally unable to lend any aid. Nothing that the most minute anatomy or physiology have taught us can bridge over that chasm — hiatus in- franchissable, Cuvier well calls it — rwhich separates p 210 MATERIALISM. what alone we know of the properties of matter from the functions we individually know and feel as the qualities of mind. Eefine upon material atoms — the fieyedr) aZiaipera — as you will, no step is gained in advance. Bring in that organic agent, Protoplasm, which some modern physiologists regard as the basis of all living organisation (a compound itself of the four great elements already known in connexion with the phenomena of life), and we still get no farther. The structure of the brain, however keenly scrutinised in its medullary and cineritious substance, its convolu- tions and commissures, and the intimate texture and distribution of its fibres and cells, discloses nothing of the real mystery. Chemistry, though subtle enough to detect a minute proportion of phosphorus in all cerebral matter, embodied in a curious crystallisable compound, protogen, of which again another compound, neurine^ is supposed to be the base, has done more to perplex than enhghten by these discoveries. Nor need this failure cause surprise, seeing how imperfect is our knowledge even of the most conspicuous parts of the structm^e of the brain ; of its douhleness as an organ, of the functions of the cerebellum, &c. To memory, the most mechanical perhaps of the mental acts, we can assign no seat or texture in the brain. We see no organisation for this vast storehouse of the past — no secret place for memories latent for half a life — no material links serving to associate them together, nor any physical cause for their decay or obliteration in old age. There has been a good deal of speculation of late founded on the cerebral cellular structure, and MATERIALISM. 211 schemes have been devised assuming to explain the phenomena of memory and association by these cellu- lar connexions. But such hypotheses are utterly with- out proof, and do not really carry us farther than the hypothetical vibrations and vibratiuncles of Hartley's school. It is better to avow ignorance than thus to screen it. And if we cannot connect this faculty with structure, far less can we conceive such connexion in the case of those higher faculties of intellect and feel- ing to which memory itself is but a minister. Minute anatomy, as well as physiological experi- ments, have afforded more certain results as to the functions associated with the medulla oblongata, me- dulla spinalis, and the nervous ganglia. But these are parts either appertaining to organic life or instru- mental only to the mental faculties. And here, as in regard to the brain, we are wholly without knowledge as to the nature of that w^onderful endowment of nervous matter^ medullary or cineritious, aggregated or granular, enabling it to fulfil such vast and various purposes throughout every grade and form of animal life. This view of the incommensurability^ as it has been called, of matter and mind, of body and soul, has been held by the philosophers of every age ; always em- barrassed, indeed, by terms vaguely defined, such as the vovs^ V'^X'*?' ^^^ TTvevfjia of the Greek schools, and the equivalent ambiguities of our own and other languages.^ * The distinction between the voDc and ^vxn, so strongly marked in the * Timseus' of Plato, is denoted even in the old Latin dramatist Attius : < Sapimus animo, firuimur anima.' p 2 212 MATERIALISM. But the questions in hand are mainly the same, and the difference in deaUng with them is chiefly that created by the severer methods of inductive enquiry. Abstract definitions of the soul and of matter are now submitted to tests which go far to exclude them from the pale of science. Aristotle's expression, that ' the soul may be better said to contain the body than the -body the soul,' defines nothing real save the impossibility of reaching the truth by that faculty of reason, the nature of which is a main part of the problem to be solved. A happier phrase, and somewhat nearer to the point, is that of Spinoza : ' Body is not terminated by thinkingy nor thinking by body.' Quotations on this subject might, indeed, be endlessly multiphed from the classical writers — from the later Platonists, from the mediaeval schools, and from the philosophy of our own time. But in their totality they prove nothing more than the absence of any conception congi-uous and common to the two elements concerned in the question, and the fruitless toil of language to redeem this incapacity of thought. I have spoken of the little that has been done by scientific discovery to fiu-nish links between mind and matter. In one sense, indeed, they may seem to be farther dissociated by those attainments of physical science which especially mark the mental capacity of man. The genius and intellectual power wliich have penetrated so deeply into the secrets of nature — measur- ing the distance of the stars and the velocity of light — predicting from the minute perturbations of one planet the existence and place of another yet unknown — de- tecting the presence of known terrestrial elements in MATERIALISM. 213 the photosphere of the sun and even of the fixed stars — making electric wires, with a speed that mocks cal- culation, the medium of human intercourse across the widest oceans — these capacities, thus developed and exalted in their objects, point at some spirituality of nature which mere matter, in our understanding of it, can never reach. That we are unable to comprehend this nature, and its complex relations to the material world, is but one of the many similar confessions we are compelled to make when seeking to interpret the mysteries around us. 214 DIFFERENCES OF RELIGIOUS BELIEF. In reasoning on this matter, whether as regards sects or individuals, few advert sufficiently to an element of distinction which must ever exist, and ever divide men, whatever creeds they may be born under or brought up in. This is the diversity of natural temperament, physical, intellectual, and moral — a diversity which the common experience of life is ever bringing before us. We see one man of hard, unflinching, sceptical logic, another vague and imaginative in his reason — one with cold affections, another warm or passionate in his feelings — one with keen and artistic senses, another dull and unimpressionable — one with buoyant physical powers, another feeble and sickly in frame. You may bring these several men under the same religous creed or denomination, but virtually, they are of different rehgious belief, if this word belief has any substantial meaning at all. And what is true as to individuals is true also, though more generally, as to the conditions under which sects and churches are formed. Certain tempera- ments tend to coalesce in certain modes of belief or outward worship ; the founders of which rehgious bodies are usually men strongly marked by correspond- ing individualities of character. Luther, Calvin, Loyola, DIFFERENCES OF RELIGIOUS BELIEF. 215 Knox, George Fox, Wesley, &c. are a few among the many instances in point. The recent movement in the AngHcan Church, seeking to restore that clerical supremacy and cere- monial for which Laud was ready to imperil both Church and State, well illustrates what I have just stated. This movement, apart from mere curiosity or love of change, has segregated to itself a class of tem- peraments, of both sexes, 'prone to all innovations exciting or soothing the senses ; and prone, as ex- perience has shown, to press yet farther in the same direction. Calvinism also has its specialties of thought and feeling, though the moods of character are perhaps less strongly marked. But even these incongruities of temperament have certain links which bring them near together in the complex network of human existence. Going back to the Apostohc age, we find an individuality /)f rehgious thought and feeling, seve- rally, in Peter, Paul, John, and James, attested alike by their alleged writings and the actions recorded of them. In the contemporary Jewish history, again, we discern, through their several tenets and usages, a similar disparity of mind in the sects of the Pharisees, Sadducees, and Essenes — differences existing in Jewish communities even to the present day. And applying this view more broadly to the various races and rehgions of different ages of the world, we find the same result of sects and superstitions based on the diversities of human temperament. The more tolerant polytheism of Greece and Eome yields least in illustra- tion. But all the religions of the East (including the 216 differe:sces of religious belief. Mahometan and the Parsee remnant of the religion of Zoroaster), and the Cathohcism of mediaival and all later times, exhibit these diverse colourings of human character, not in individuals merely, but in those divisions and hostile sects which every religion is prone to engender v^ithin itself In every age and country, under one shape or other, we find the same innate diversities of temperament which lead to this result — the enthusiastic and credulous, the philosophical and sceptical, the formal and ceremonial, the austere and ascetic. Fames multiply and are ever changing, but the essential character of human nature continues the same, however disguised in outward lineaments. Eeli- gious distinctions, indeed, are often mere matter of inheritance from one generation to another, in nations as well as in families. But causes are at work beyond this ; and the gorgeous ceremonials of the Eoman Church, in contrast to the austere worship of Puritans and Quakers, represents a distinction deeply graven in the map of human life. When Cardinal Eetz described his own tempera- ment as ' le moins ecclesiastique que fut dans Tunivers,' he well denoted his peculiar idiosyncrasy. When Sir Isaac Newton, a man of very different stamp, said to Leclerc, 'In disputable passages of Scripture I love to take up with that which I can best understand,' he aptly depictures the love of fact and truth deeply innate in his own mind. Such diversities, among lesser men than these, are matter of the most common observation, though not always duly estimated in their bearings upon life, and especially in the connexion they establish DIFFERENCES OF RELIGIOUS BELIEF. 217 between natural temperament and the religious attach- ments of the man. Professional experience, especially diuring the last twenty years, has strikingly illustrated this to my own knowledge, and often by cases forming in themselves a little romance of struggles between native temperament and the conditions of life pressing harshly upon it. History and biography abound in curious and painful examples to the same effect. In discussing the subject of religious belief it must ever be kept in mind how vague and changeable in meaning this word belief is ; a phantom without sub- stance to the world at large ; and even with those who bring thought and feeling to the subject, only to be interpreted by the individual character of each. This may seem a harsh judgment on a word of popular and needful use, but it will be justified to anyone who cares to examine its actual application in the case before us.^ Admitting these various premises, one conclusion to be drawn from them is, that all creeds, to form truly and effectively a basis and bond of religious unity, should be large and lenient in their scope, simple and humble in their phraseology. It is a hard thing, and worse than useless, to subject the con- sciences of men now living to the dogmas of Councils assembled in dark ages, and dishonouring even those ages by their bigoted and violent conflicts. Hilar}^ living and acting himself amidst Councils and creeds, ^ Neander, in his treatise ' Das eine und mannigfaltige des Christ- lichen Lebens,' dwells much on the adaptations of Christianity to the idiosyncrasies of men. 218 DIFFERENCES OF RELIGIOUS BELIEF. strikingly depictures the hatreds and follies in which they originated. We may well join with Milton's remonstrance against ' crowding free consciences and Christian liberties into canons and precepts of men.' It is another question whether Churches, as such, can be held together without some formularies as a rule and test of unity. But this question should never be handled save under recollection ot the changes time is continually working in the world, and especially in our own day. It is fitting that forms of subscription, the imposition of other ages, should be removed or lightened by reason, rather than forcibly annulled by reason's revolt. 219 SCEPTICISM AND CREDULITY. Bentley says, ' Commend me to an argument that, like a flail, there's no defence against it.' But such arguments are rarely to be found, even in physical science, far less in that moral and metaphysical world in which it is a part of our destiny to live and exercise thought. In another of these papers I allude to the various and vast disparity of the reasoning power in different minds — a fact, like many others, too famihar to be seen in all its import. There is a logic, or want of logic, peculiar to every mind. The perception of truth, and the mode of arriving at conclusions upon evidence, are curiously different in different men. Some men are the ready slaves of dogmas, vague hypotheses, or frauds upon the senses under the garb of science. Others carry the shield of scepticism ever before them, sometimes so closely as to exclude all sight of what is beyond. The moral and intellectual temperament are both concerned in this diversity, which shows itself in religion, politics, art, literature, and every matter of social life. Not merely individuals but races and ages of men exhibit such dissimilarities. When Biot says, speaking 220 SCEPTICISM AND CREDULITY. of the time of Galileo, 'a cette epoque la doute n'etait pas iiiventee,' he is asserting what is a general truth as regards both the ancient and the scholastic philosophy. The subjective methods of thought (to use a German neology) dominated in these ages over the objective. Truth was sought for not by experimental proof, but by abstract reasoning and logical formularies. In our days, owing mainly to the methods and successes of physical science, the demand for proof is ever becom- ing more absolute in all departments of human enquiry, and an enlarged scepticism in this sense is lawful and well justified by its results. Questions, however, there are and will ever remain in which the highest attainment of human reason can be that of presumption only, and such questions are those which best try the minds of different men in their dealings with doubt. Our lot is cast among things certain and things uncertain or unknown; the latter more numerous where the senses fail us and thought is occupied with objects unseen, or with those invisible powers that cause the things we see. Here the approach to truth is often through tortuous paths, along which none but clear and strong intellects can find their way, or rightly discover where this way is closed by obstacles which human reason cannot surmount. Those so gifted are alone able, while well defining the objects sought for, to shun the many pitfalls which the placita philo- sophoiixm, the seduction of hypothesis, and the shiftings and artifices of language put in their path. The right balancing of presumptive evidence is the highest form of natural logic. The reception and right use of the SCEPTICISM AND CREDULITY. 221 results so obtained is the highest function of human reason. Eecognising physical science as that portion of our knowledge which has done most to quicken and define all that relates to the evidence of truth, it may be well to remark that as the circle of such knowledge enlarges the circle of doubt enlarges also. A single new fact discovered may beget ten questions unseen before, and equally requiring solution. Science abounds in such instances. What Newton terms ' the ocean of undis- covered truth ' spreads out more widely before us as we advance upon it — darkness, or faint gleams of light only, upon its horizon. Some men stand doubtingly on the shore, or embark with a spirit too timid for disco- very ; others adventure suddenly and rashly on this unknown sea ; a few, by some happy intuition or acci- dent, find what may be called a ' North-West Passage ' to the truth sought for ; but it is usually reached only by assiduous labour, and the fortunate conjunction of zeal with a rational scepticism. Natural temperament, in fact, is the ruling power in the intellectual as in the moral world ; and its diver- sities in different men can alone expound the anomalies we every day see in the antagonistic habits of scep- ticism and credulity. Those of credulity are doubtless the more remarkable in our age, as in every antecedent time, and form a curious chapter in the mental history of man — a chapter saddening in some of its aspects, but in others relieved by its kindred with that poetic faculty appertaining to man alone. Creduhty changes its forms and objects in each successive age, but as a 222 SCEPTICISM AND CREDULITY. mental quality it is ever, the same, and ever preyed upon by similar arts and impostures. In our own age the grim romance of the ghost-story has been succeeded by the coarser follies of spirit-rapping, table-turning, &c., all fastening upon that particular temperament among mankind which is ever ready to accept belief without weighing the evidence for it — even more ready, it might seem, where the things propounded are most incredible. The sense implied in the phrase, ' Credo quia impossibile est,' must not be confined to doctrinal divinity alone. The sobriety and hard logic of the sceptical tem- perament come in natural correction of the feebleness or intemperance of credulity ; and in some sort indeed they are mutually corrective, and knowledge gains from the conflict. For scepticism itself is sometimes largely in excess, and becomes a hindrance to minds otherwise powerful in seeking for truth. Dr. WoUas- ton, whom I well knew, was a striking instance of this. With high intellectual powers, with leisure and other appliances at command, he shut himself out from great discoveries at a period fertile of such by a morbid demand for certainty at every step of progress. The story connected with his discovery of palladium is w^ell known. His was a mind that would never give to probabilities or hypotheses their due weight in scien- tific enquiry. The record we have of D'Alembert, in his fife and writings, furnishes another striking example of this sceptical temperament. Devoted to mathe- matical proof, he could discern nothing of truth or reality, beyond or outside, unless through demonstra- SCEPTICISM AND CREDULITY. 223 tion so obtained. He seems to have ignored the fact that probability is, after all, the great and necessary guide in every part of human hfe. The scepticism of Bayle was of a different kind ; but there was fitness in the epithet he apphed to himself of ve^eXyjyepeTa Zeus, from his habit of gathering doubts around every topic he touched. Other instances might be quoted, but as regards the question of excess they still leave the balance large on the side of credulity. No one can better affirm this than the physician of long and various experience. In my volume of 'Medical Notes and Eeflections,' first pubhshed twenty- six years ago, there is a chapter on ' Medical Evidence,' in which, while admitting the in- herent difficulties of the subject, I found occasion to comment on the curious credulity of the world in all that regards the nature and treatment of disease, and the injurious reflex action which this often exercises upon the minds of physicians themselves. Though I had much reason to be satisfied with the success of this work, I heard from several quarters the remark upon it that I raised more questions than I solved. And the comment was a just one. Mental temperament on my own part had doubtless some influence in this ; but the cause was chiefly to be found in the actual state of medical knowledge, still far below the conditions of an exact science, its evidences singularly complex in kind, and fettered by numerous prejudices and antiquated precepts, a hindrance to truth and the source of error and various evils in practice. The sceptical temperament as applied to religion is 224 SCEPTICISM AND CREDULITY. a topic by itself, yet seen here also under the same antagonism to credulity as in other less momentous concerns of human life. The diversity of human creeds as regards Revelation, and the utter inability of human reason to comprehend the great mysteries of creation and the Creator save under the simple aspects of de- sign and power, may well explain the common direc- tion of the sceptical mind to these points. But that mind must be shallow in reason which refuses belief to all it cannot understand, and rejects the notion of God and Providential design, because it cannot measure the greatness of the universe, or interpret the seeming anomalies and evils affecting the little world on which man has his being. The scepticism of the atheist, strictly so called, halts at its first step ; and his theory, if he has one, can only be expressed in terms as diffi- cult to comprehend as are the facts which he seeks to subvert. 225 INSANITY. The many definitions of Insanity are the best proof of the httle of practical vakie which has been gained from the attempt. If broad in principle, they are lost in particular applications. If resting on individualities, these. are so numerous that definitions can neither com- pass nor connect them. There are as many varieties of insanity as of human character, as many forms and degrees of disordered mind as of the intellectual and moral qualities in their sane, state. The transitions from sanity to insanity, and the changes incident to the latter, are endlessly varied, yet even here we can gene- rally recognise that law of continuity which so largely prevails in the world around us.^ The medical man who comes into a witness-box with a formal definition of madness is generally tor- tured into contradictions or doubts. In some legal cases of this kind, beset with grave difficulties, it might be better if the medical examination could be taken out of open court. A clever barrister, however igno- rant himself, may readily put questions perplexing to the most upright and experienced physician. The * A recent classification of the forms of insanity, by Ludesdorf of Vienna, into aberrations by exaltation, by depression, and from weakness, may be considered among the best, simply because the least definite in details. 226 INSANITY. subject is one so beset with metaphysical and verbal subtleties, that it is hard to find firm ground to stand upon ; and the only suggestion which can be offered is that of eschewing all formal definitions, and connecting the question of sanity or insanity in each particular case, as far as possible, with some specific practical test. But, deal with the matter as we will, the difficulties are great, and explain, if they do not vindicate, the frequent contradictions noted in medical evidence upon insanity. The intellectual character of the witness himself becomes an element in the question. Aberra- tions of mind — such especially as arise from excess or deficiency of natural faculties and feelings — are dif- ferently seen and construed by different men, according to their own temperament and several capacities for observation. My experience furnishes me with many examples to this effect. One of the best as well as simplest tests of insanity is the inversion of some distinct habit of feeling or action, strikingly marked in the previous character of the individual ; the more sudden and complete this in- version^ the stronger the evidence of unsound mind. Such proof can only occasionally be had, since insanity shows itself more frequently as an excess or distortion of some wonted habit or feeling. But enquiry should always be directed to this point. A question which in one form or other has hung over any theory of insanity is its relation to the cere- bral organisation. One opinion attributes all devia- tions from what we call reason to changes in the INSANITY. 227 brain — the cerveau vialade; and others, as Leuret, recently, place the disorder in the spiritual intelli- gence itself. This is virtually the old question of materialism put into a more special form. The phe- nomena of dreaming, delirium, and drunkenness, as well as the moods of insanity itself, and their tendency to become hereditary, are brought in sanction of the former view. Its frequent occurrence in the most marked forms, without detection of the slightest organic disease of the brain, furnishes argument for the latter, but an argument ever subject to the exception that disease may really exist in textures to which neither eye nor microscope give us access. The relation of dreaming to insanity has been dwelt upon from the time of Cicero downwards. The dis- tinction lies in this, that dreams are for the most part an incongruous mimicry, while the senses are closed, of waking sensations, thoughts, and events — incon- gruous as to time, place, and connexion ; madness is a persistent adherence (not corrected by the outward senses, though these are awake) of images, thoughts, or feelings, devoid of what may be called reality, and begetting actions equally incongruous. As a definition this is as incomplete as others, but it serves to distin- guish between the wandering and transient dream, made up of fitful memories, when the senses are more or less closed, and the fixed delusions of insanity, often contradicting the evidence of the senses, and all the acts and impulses of antecedent life. I have visited lunatic asylums in most parts of Europe, and many in America, without any abatement 228 INSANITY. of the profound and painful interest belonging to such' inspections. The statistics of insanity, deal with them as we may, are a mournful and mysterious page in the moral history of man. I fear it must be admitted that what we call civilisation^ especially that of crowded communities, tends to aggravate this condition of luanan suffering, and from causes readily understood. Enquirj^ expressly made, has everywhere told me the same tale, that religion, love, anxieties of business, and intemperance are chief among the direct causes of insanity in the world. Add to these hereditary ten- dency, whencesover originally derived, and we see but too well how these mental maladies have embodied themselves in the social state of man, even under the highest intellectual cultivation. 229 HISTORY. Gibbon describes History as 'little more than the register of the crimes, follies, and vices of mankind,* and recording, as he does, the history of twelve dark centuries, he might well arrive at this conclusion. But its truth is not limited to any particular period or por- tion of the inhabited world. Take a century from any recorded time, of any country or race of men — from the Egyptian, Jewish, Assyrian, Greek or Eoman history, from the dark ages, middle ages, or the last 100 years of our own age — it is everywhere the same continuous relation of wars, of national or personal struggles for territory or political power. Sydney Smith, with his w^onted force of familiar illustration, calculates that since the Peace of Utrecht thirty-five minutes out of every hour have been passed in war. I have myself made a rude reckoning on the subject, drawn from the ])rinted pages both of ancient and modem history — from the Greek, Latin, and Byzantine historians, as well as those of England, France, Italy, and Germany, in later times. The result is somewhat varied by the temper and style of the particular historian ; but taking an average of the whole, it shows that two-thirds of the world's written history during 2,500 years, under every form of government, religion, and civilisation, is 230 HISTORY. a narrative of warfare, or its inevitable adjuncts — the fidxat fivpLoveKpoL of all nations of men. The gates of Janus, at Eome, were closed but three times during 700 years. The accounts we have of savage life, even in the smallest and most remote isles of the ocean, all tell the same tale of strife and bloodshed. Look, again, at the large proportion of European history of which courts, sovereigns, ministers, pohtical intrigues and diplomacy make up the engrossing or sole material. It is true that the record here is of those whose acts and fortunes have had largest in- fluence on the world. But what a mass of mankind is left unnoticed and unknown beneath the stage on which these higher actors play their parts in the world's drama ! ^ They have led armies and migrations of men from region to region; have founded or destroyed empires ; have framed governments and laws, and abol- ished them ; have attained eminence either by virtue or by crime. Yet underneath all these things lies the history of nine-tenths of the human race — untold, or told only by casual and scanty notices. Generations of this multitude successively pass away without leaving a mark behind. As an old writer says, ' The greater part of the world must be content to be as though it had never been.' Even in the countries fondly called civihsed how often are we surprised and shocked by casually disen- * Goethe comments justly on this partial colouring of history: — ^ Was hier den Geist der Zeiten heisst, Das ist im Grund der Herren eignen Geist, In dem die Zeiten sich bespiegeln.' HISTORY. 231 tombing a part of the community coming closely to savage life in their ignorance, habits, and vices — these characters veiled over, but not extinguished by proxi- mity to higher grades of cultivation. Which is the nation so far advanced as not to furnish examples of these strange contiguous diversities — the inevitable result of crowded population, and of that ' labour to live' which is the necessary lot of so large a part of mankind ? The Mob of every age and country — a unity in itself — tells the tale of that vast substratum of human life of which civilisation, w^hen it exists at all, is but the surface and the colouring. Take the approximate number of 1,000 miUions as peopling the earth. Give to civilised life its just definition and demarcation, and see how small is the proportion of this mass of human existence which can be brought under the title ! A numerical estimate must needs be very vague in this case, yet we can scarcely err in rating it at less than a fiftieth part of the whole. All that lies outside this narrow limit is httle regarded by the ordinary historian, even where materials exist for his use. Macaulay, in one of the first paragraphs of his great work, strongly points out the baldness and imperfection of history, thus confined to the affairs of courts and camps. His third chapter well exemphfies what he himself could do in correction of this common defi- ciency. Gibbon held the same views ; but his History embraced too long a time and too wide a space for its fair application. The historians of our own day, fore- stalled as to larger themes, work much upon detached periods of time, and with greater profusion of details. 232 HISTORY. The demand now made for minuteness in these details has a sort of parity with the requisitions of modern science as regards chemical analysis. Still, what we gain from this minute research is generally little more than an amphfied narrative of war, diplomacy, and court or party intrigue ; witness the volumes of Mr. Fronde, on the reign of Elizabeth (now lying before me), fed with papers from that great depot at Simancas which has furnished so much towards the history of the sixteenth century. Curiosity has of late been variously pampered by documents drawn from secret and unex- pected sources. There is a certain danger belonging to these in the undue importance they often assume to the historian who himself discovers and uses them. There are few writers who can wholly resist this seduction. In some relations to these tendencies of the his- torians of our day comes the fashion — sometimes justified, oftener not so — of upsetting old opinions as to persons and historical events. Two-thirds of the early Eoman have been swept away by the merciless criticism of Niebuhr, Lewes, and Mommsen, without due regard to the fact that a simple town could not have become the germ of an empire without some such course of events as those which stand recorded to us. A spirit of paradox has gone much farther as regards the character of historical personages. The crimes of Eoman emperors have had their apologists, and Eichard III. and Henry VIII. have been held up as martyrs to faulty interpretation of their acts. All history is open to correction, but it ought to be sedulously guarded against these paradoxes and personal partialities. HISTORY. 233 One formula of history, not wholly new, indeed, nor without its recommendations, has recently become common in this country. It is, in fact, history carried on by a series of biographies of persons who have suc- cessively filled some eminent place in public affairs, archbishops, chancellors, chief justices, &c. Such scheme of narrative, impartially conducted, has the advantage always derived from continuity in the main object, while collaterally including the various rela- tions of each such series to the other elements of national government. There is danger, doubtless, lest this method be carried too far, and lead to unimportant biographies written by inferior hands. The saying of Sir Thomas Browne, ' There goes a great deal of conscience to the writing of a history,' applies especially to cases where biography forms the substratum of what is written. But it has fitting application also to his- torians at large. Honesty of general purpose and honesty in details are not less essential than the faculty of judgment as to the evidence of facts. Cicero de- notes as the prima lex of history, ' ne quid falsa dicere audeat, ne quid veri non audeat.' To recur to history in its more general sense. When we speak of the history of the world, how few con- sider the wide gaps in this great story — the vast periods of time shrouded in impenetrable darkness ! These periods are not solely such as come before all certain record, but those also which often interpose and blend themselves with recognised history. A single century may be rich in its record of men and events in a country where succeeding centuries have passed away 234 HISTORY. leaving little or no mark behind. Omitting the eailier marvel of the Homeric poems, less than two centuries comprised all the grandeur of Grecian intellect. The art of Gibbon has compressed into a single sentence — one that must have been music to his own ear— the almost contemporaneous names of all the greatest philo- sophers, poets, statesmen, and orators of Athens. The political life of this wonderful city at the same period has been ably pictured to us in the great work of Mr. Grote. But there is some reason for thinking with Sallust that the Athenian history has gained undue prominence from the great names and elegant writers by whom it has been transmitted to other countries and ages.^ And in any case how small a spot is Greece in the map of the peopled world, and how short this illustrious period compared with the twenty centuries following of servitude and decay ! There are few persons, indeed, who rightly appre- ciate the element of time in its relation to historical events. Historians themselves, either from necessity or neglect, have contributed much to this defective view. Eecurring to Gibbon for an example, we find him including in a single chapter between 500 and 600 years of Byzantine history following the death of Heraclius. The wonderfid art of the writer gives it the aspect of continuous history, yet how small the in- sight obtained into the real condition of this empire and of the whole Eoman world during a period as 1 When two scholars eminent as are Mr. Grote and Professor Jowett differ so far in their understanding of the familiar term of Sophists, we may well appreciate the difficulties of a right comprehension. HISTORY. 28S long as that from Edward I. to our own time ! In our Scriptures the single Book of Judges gives the history of the Jews for upwards of three centuries ; while of the forty years passed by the same people in the Desert, under conditions difficult to be understood, thirty-eight years are recorded in a few verses only. Such distances are numerous, as are also those strange gaps, either utterly void or filled with fables alone, which some- times occur between two periods of authentic history. In the early British history, for example, 'an age of fable completely separates two ages of truth.' So also in that of Germany. However it may be with the laborious and learned readers of that country, how little do we in England know of its history succeeding the disruption of the Eoman Empire and the era of Charlemagne, while the wars of the Guelfs and Ghibel- lines, in Italy, are the meagre but chief exponents to us of the great Teutonic people at a period still later. Or, recurring once more to the Jewish history, how little is familiarly known of that long period between the later records of the Old Testament and those of the New, though during that period there grew out of the wars of the Maccabees and other events those sects and usages of the Jewish people — notably of the Pharisees and Sadducees — which form such important elements in the Gospel narratives. To gain something like a just estimate of historical time it has been my frequent practice to take some well-known period — say, one, two, or three centuries of recent English history — and place them in relation to the same length of time in the history of other ages in 236 HISTORY. other countries ; as, for instance, to bring together the three centuries of undisturbed Eoman power in Britain, and the equal period from the accession of Ehzabeth to the present day. This method, simple as it is, suffices to correct many erroneous impressions, and to explain various seeming anomalies in the history of mankind. History can never be rightly studied with- out the aid of these comparisons or parallelisms of time. After all, we must be content to take this word History as a general term, denoting insulated and im- perfect records of portions of mankind, in certain countries and during certain periods — lost, moreover, in utter darkness when seeking to go backwards to the first presence of man on the earth. The fossil history of lower forms of animal life, at periods far anterior in the depth of time, is better known to us than are the first ages of the human race. The question as to the antiquity of man has, indeed, passed from the historian to the geologist, whose researches, though not attain- ing actual numerical results, do yet indicate rela- tive dates, and a point of time more remote than any other record or tradition we possess. Mr. Buckle in his recent works has sought to give to history the character of a science. His project was too ambitious, and came to an end even before the scaffolding of the edifice was completed. The condi- tions pf a science are in truth wholly wanting ; while as a branch of positive philosophy, in the system of M. Comte, the claim of history is little better assured. But regarded simply as a portion of human know- HISTORY. 237 ledge, it doubtless admits of being enlarged and vivified by being made a more complete portraiture of the millions ruled, as well as of the ruling few, who leave their impress on each successive age. In relation to this latter point much may be looked for in England from those multitudinous State records which, entombed hitherto in various dusty re- positories, have recently been collected, catalogued, and rendered easy of access by the judicious energy of the present Master of the Eolls. Though devoted largely to the objects I have named as the main ma- terial of all history, they collaterally afford much illustration of the social state of the country at differ- ent periods. For the period in which we are now living, enriched even to incumbrance by the produc- tions of the press, the future historian of England will find his chief embarrassment in the multiplicity of materials before him. His office will be, not so much to seek for facts as to sift and condense them — a remark applying to all future European history, as well as to that of the new world in the West. V.,r: 238 SHAKESPEARE. Everyone who rightly cherishes and studies Shake- speare becomes more or less a commentator upon him. So vast is his variety that among the creations of his genius every man may find some counterpart to him- self and his own moods of mind. Every taste and temper is met and satisfied with something that is done better than it was ever done before or since. I put down here a few scattered comments ; none perhaps new, but some of them not occurring to my recollection elsewhere. Every good English writer knows the efficiency of monosyllables. Shakespeare manifestly appreciated their force and value. Frequent instances occur of three or four lines wholly thus composed. In one passage ( ' Eichard 11.,' act iv. scene 1) seven lines come consecutively with only one dissyllabic word. I have often tried, but never could discover any principle determining Shakespeare in his use of rhymed verses, and admixture of them with prose, save in those cases where a rhyme at the close of a scene or long speech is brought in to give force and point to the conclusion. In other cases it would seem simply as if he indulged in that careless abandonment to his genius so peculiar to the man — one rhyme, SHAKESPEARE. 239 even as a mere play upon words, carrying him on to others. The same question, and perhaps the same conclu- sion, may be applied to those frequent changes from prose to verse and verse to prose, even in the same scene and with the same persons on the stage, which, though often connected with the relative dignity of the persons and subjects handled, yet in many other cases can be referred only to that free and copious licence which he ever gave to the inspiration or even whim of the moment. He may be said — and it can equally be said of none other — to have written without fear of criti- cism and without eagerness for fame. Almost it may be cited as a proof of his genius that he could afford to be so inveterate a player with the sound and double sense of words. Dr. Johnson, to give pith to one of his own phrases, describes the love of Shakespeare for a quibble as 'the fatal Cleopatra for which he lost the world, and was content to lose it.' The world he did not lose, but he carried so far this current foible of the age as to show that it was a fashion of speech in which his mind revelled. He dehghts, too, in spinning out a sort of verbal logic, of which the long speech of Pandulph, in 'King John' (act iii. scene 1), is a striking example. Words flowed upon him so exuberantly that they became playthings in his hands. In Sheridan's play the slipslop blunders of Mrs. Malaprop, like her name, are felt to be got up by the art of the writer. The wit of Shakespeare in this way has the higher art of concealing art. Every blunder of Dogberry, Elbow, Launcelot, &c. has an appropriate 240 SHAKESPEARE. drollery of its own, apart from mere play upon words; something difRcult to define, but which is felt to be ' exquisite fooling.' No single instance of Shakespeare's power is more striking than the two scenes in which Portia and Lady Percy, Brutus and Hotspur, are presented in such mar- vellous contrast, under circumstances exactly alike even to the turbid dreams telling of conspiracies at hand. Let the two scenes be read simply with reference to this contrast, and the power will be seen of that genius which could mould into forms of speech, so exquisitely appropriate to each, diversities of character thus strongly marked. Compare the solemn tenderness of Portia's appeal to her husband with the playful but as tender vivacity of Lady Percy. Put into contrast that touching speech of Brutus, won to the disclosure of his secret — You are my true and honourable wife, As dear to me as are those ruddy drops That visit my sad heart — with the manner in which Percy intercepts and throws aside his wife's lighter appeal. The sequel of the latter scene none but Shakespeare could have written. Two other things occur to me in the plays just named, one of which I have not seen noticed, the other not satisfactorily explained. Falstaff, brimming over with wit and fun for those who could imderstand him, or for his own entertainment when alone, drops the mood altogether when Shallow and Silence are his sole company. His jokes on the recruits are for his own enjoyment. He reserves the inanities of Justice SHAKESPEARE. 241 Shallow for the future laughter of the Prince and Poins. An inferior artist to Shakespeare would not have exercised this nice discrimination. What I have never heard well explained in the play of ' Julius Caesar ' is the direct denial by Brutus to Messala, the messenger from Eome, of his having heard anything of Portia, when immediately before, in excuse for his angry mood, he had related to Cassius the fact and manner of her death. It is hardly pos- sible to ascribe this to inadvertence. But what, then, is the explanation of it ? Gray says of Shakespeare, 'He had, I beheve, several souls to his own share ; ' and Coleridge some- where calls him fxvpLavovs. The phrase is a happy one, for there is nothing more wonderful than his superiority to all others in . so many and such diverse kinds of excellence. One of the very few wagers I ever laid was with Lord Nugent (a consummate Shakespearian scholar) upon his assertion that there was not a single passage in Shakespeare commending, directly or indirectly, the moral qualities of the dog. I thought this so unlikely that I took the wager, a year being freely given for its settlement. Though aided by others, I could find no such passage or phrase, and I paid the money, mar- velling that such should be the issue of the wager. Of the conjectures as to Sliakespeare's religious opinions none that I have seen are very satisfactory. They have chiefly regarded the question of his leaning to the Eomish or the Eeformed Church. He lived in times disturbed and heated by this great change. He B 242 SHAKESPEARE. knew also something of the sects growing up under- neath the Eeformed Church, and his writings show that he was intimately versed in the history and phraseology of the Bible. That he has touched so slightly on any topic of religious doctrine or contro- versy, while making his characters the utterance of such deep thought on all other human affairs, goes far to prove his intended avoidance of the subject. If the passage in his will be taken into evidence, it seems to express the belief of a Protestant Christian. Are we to grieve, or not, that so little is known of the hfe of Shakespeare ? As in the case of Homer, is there not something which feeds the fancy in the mystery surrounding him ? Yet we might well desire to know what were the characters of childhood and youth in such a man ? when, and in what way, his genius broke forth ? under what impulse and methods he composed those works which have given him immortahty? The Sonnets have been diligently searched for his personal history, but tliey have rather thickened than dispelled the cloud which hangs over it. Except the signature to his will we have not a word of his writing. He indicates his own individu- ality less than any of those whom we reckon the great writers of the world ; certainly than any of later ages. The few passages alluding to him by contemporary writers serve little more than to whet curiosity. His portraits are of doubtful reality ; and, whether willing or not, we must submit to the behef that what we know of Shakespeare is all that will ever be known. The veneration for Shakespeare has certainly much SHAKESPEARE. 243 augmented within my own memory — a testimony in itself to the growing culture of the age. Putting aside theatrical representation, there is a deeper and more critical study of all that he has written, great labour given to the corrections of the text, a higher appre- ciation of his various powers, and eagerness after every fact that can illustrate in any way the individuality of the man. For something of all this we are ourselves indebted to German writers, Goethe, Schlegel, Tieck, &c., some of whom have pushed their critical analysis beyond any probable conceptions of Shakespeare him- self. I recollect dining with Augustus Schlegel, at Sir J. Mackintosh's, some forty years ago, when he spoke insultingly of the ignorance in England of our greatest author, adding that Enghshmen must come to Germany to study him aright. The excellence of his own translation of Shakespeare gave a certain sort of authority to this comment. 244 INFLUENCE OF WORDS AND NAMES, Many maxims and trite sayings are current on tliis subject, and justly so. But sucli maxims, even if remembered, will never annul this influence on the minds of men. Words have been wittily called ' the counters of wise men, and the money of fools.' Few, however, are wise and strong enough to see and put aside all counterfeit coin, and to resist the tyranny which daily and hourly use inflicts upon them. Hobbes well says, ' It is a great ability in a man, out of the words and contexture of language, to deliver himself from equivocation.' It is, in truth, one of the best tests of a sound mind to be able to do so. I speak of words and names here simply as such, since in numerous cases it is a single word or name which governs a question to the reason of man. Ab- stract philosophy, religion, literature and art, social usages, and even the sterner physical sciences, teem with examples. Luther says of St. Paul's style that his words are 'living creatures.' So, in fact, are innumerable words which enter into common speech, and even into the inmost recesses of thought, impel- hng, controlling, or distorting, despite all reason to the contrary. -ii- INFLUENCE OF WORDS AND NAMES. 245 It would be amusing as well as instructive to catalogue the dominant words which, in different lan- guages, meet us at the threshold of all learning. Many of these are the bequest of ancient philosophy — some necessary as aids to thought and speech, some obstructive for want of due definition, others insuscep- tible of definition altogether ; many altered in meaning by time and human changes, some the growth of common use, others the petted offspring of particular schools. Psychology, under its various titles, is that part of science in which the dominion of words is largest and most uncontrolled. When we speak of the soul, the mind, the spiritual nature — of sensation, per- ception, ideas, feelings, volitions, conceptions, &c., these terms serve their purpose, it may be, as well as any others would do, yet they are all apt to become what Berkeley has called ' scholastic shadows,' vaguely understood and vaguely applied.^ It is, indeed, very especially in metaphysical enquiries that words become the bladders upon which ancient errors and crude con- ceptions are floated down the stream of time. No writer has expressed this more strongly than Goethe ; yet he himself, while following the philosophy of Spinoza and Leibnitz, was enslaved by the language of his own poetical temperament. Every physician knows that in diseases hitherto found incurable the number of remedies professing to cure is always the greatest : so in the more inscrutable problems of life and mind, * A recent struggle between Mr. Mill and Dean Mansel over the body of Sir W. Hamilton's philosophy somewhat recalls the language and methods of the scholastic age. 246 INFLUENCE OF WORDS AND NAMES. language is ever enlarging its vocabulary without com- ing nearer to what is an intelligible reality. The same thing happens even in physical science, the domains of which, though rapidly spreading, are yet on every side circumscribed by lines which mark the limits of human thought. It is in approaching these confines that we are most beset by the entangle- ments of language. The words ' substance,' ' elements,' * atoms,' ' force,' ' momentum,' ' inertia,' ' afiinity,' ' cor- relation,' 'potential or latent energy,' &c. all express great natural facts, yet all are open more or less to doubtful use and misconception. Despite this exactness, indeed, the physical sciences often halt upon particular phrases, which seem to record final truths, but which further research compels us to discard. It is curious to note the efiect on the mind of words and phrases coming to us in another language, the translation of those familiar to us in our own. This I have often felt in passing from our version of the New Testament to the Greek text, the antique English of the translation often superadding a certain meaning of its own. Or, to take slighter instances : who can read the titles of Shakespeare's comedies in their German translation without a whimsical feehng of novelty, or acquiesce at once in the name of Schwazerd for the pious and gentle Melanchthon ; or in that of Arouet for the witty and profligate Voltaire ? The wonted names are deeply rooted in the mind, and it is difiicult or even harassing to dislodge them thence. The influence of words deriving charm and weight from their mere antiquity, the ' verba a vetustate repe- INFLUENCE OP WORDS AND NAMES. 247 tita,' is well known ; and it was so in the classical ages as it is now. On the other hand, we have to encounter constantly the seductions of new words, sometimes necessary to the progress of knowledge, but often giving only a new facing to old facts and opinions. All that Quintilian says on these topics is excellent. The theology of the Christian Church in its darker ages is heavily chargeable with invention of new words — the creation of doctrinal controversy — and is gene- rally ponderous in proportion to the obscurity of the matter. This remark occurs to me fresh from reading the Epistles of the Patriarch Photius, whose mastery of Greek (well attested by Person's double labour on his Lexicon) revelled in the construction of compound words — a luxury to his intellect, as well as a necessity of the topics he is handling. Bacon speaks of ' the ill- starred aUiance between the old philosophy and the new faith.' This alliance required and invented a lan- guage of its own, which has been too largely trans- mitted by inheritance to our own creeds and con- troversies. 248 SUBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS OF THE EYE. The word subjective thus used was given by Purkinge (a physicist whom I knew at Breslau) to a class of phe- nomena meriting more attention than they have re- ceived — difficult of study, it is true, from their complex and transient nature, and their diversity in difierent persons. Science has well taught us the modes under which hght reaches the retina and optic nerve. But here we lose the traces of it as a physical agent, both as regards the visual perception conveyed to the mind and. those reflex lights and images of which w^e can hardly define the seat, but which emerge from within the eye, and are the subjects of distinct perception by the mind. These spectra vary greatly, and, under different bodily conditions, in the same person. They require to produce them the exclusion, more or less complete, of outward vision ; and pressirre upon the eye, either by closure of the lid or some stronger compression from without. I regret not to have made more note of their forms and changes in my own case. But there are two forms which have drawn so strongly upon my attention for some time past, for the last year espe- cially, that I think them worthy of notice among these curious phenomena. SUBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS OP THE EYE. 249 The first — rare and transient indeed compared with the other — is the appearance to the closed eye of several lines, four, five, or six, of printed type, not exactly of the same length, nor exactly parallel, with divisions as of separate words — seeming as if easy to be read, yet mocking, by speedy confusion or disap- pearance, the attempt to read them. This spectrum rarely lasts more than thirty or forty seconds. In some cases I can connect it, from the configuration of the image, with the recent act of reading ; but at other times it occurs after tlie eyes have been long closed in sleep or otherwise. I do not recollect to have noticed this appearance until within the last year or two. The second phenomenon is also one of recent obser- vation, though, as there is required an act of will or attention to be conscious of it, the physical condition implied may have existed before without such con- sciousness. When in the first approach of sleep, the eyes being closed, I direct attention to the organ of vision, a luminous spectrum of whitish green light ap- pears, as if coming laterally upon the eye, about the size of a common watch-glass, and nearly circular in its outline, but indented in its circumference by ^ve or six conical notches, and intersected in its area by a sort of network of dark lines, presenting occasionally somewhat of a regular configuration, but none that can be defined as constant. This luminous circle is visible as such for two or three seconds ; it then contracts itself equably from the circumference inwards, till nothing is left but a central bright nucleus. At the 250 SUBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS OF THE EYE. moment when this nucleus has shrunk to a mere point the luminous circle breaks out suddenly again, of the same size and aspect ; and the spectral series is re- peated precisely in the same order and time as before, four or five such series occurring within a minute. Gradually the phenomena become feebler ; and I have generally found that after a certain time, perhaps half-an-hour, they wholly disappear. I have never known them recur after the first period of sleep. The particular posture in bed does not alter the appearances. And I may further add that they occur equally in any locahty, on sea as on land.^ I have used here the phrase of ' directing attention to the organ^ and I revert to this, inasmuch as it ex- presses, thus applied, a great physical fact not suffi- ciently recognised, viz., the power the mind has of momentarily attaching its perception or consciousness to particular portions of the body, and ever with some change of feehng or function thereby produced in the part. In a chapter of my ' Mental Physiology ' I have dealt expressly with this subject ; but I could add much more upon it were this chapter to be written again. * In a lecture delivered at Leeds some years ago, Sir J. Herschel describes various analogous ocular spectra occurring to himself ' under forms of symmetry and geometrical regularity ' — some of them circular and singularly like those I have described above. I do not recollect, however, that he denotes their intermission and recurrence in exact similarity of interval and aspects. 251 MAN AND NATURE} [CONTBIBUTED TO THE 'EDINBURGH ReVIEw' IN 1864.] Of the two works which we place at the head of this article, the first is of largest pretension, both in title and extent, and is that to which we seek chiefly to direct the attention of our readers. The second is a small volume comprising the substance of a course of Lectures on Chmate, delivered at Torquay, by Dr. Daubeny, the Oxford Professor of Botany. The topic is one having such close connexion with the objects of the larger work of Mr. Marsh, that we willingly bring the volumes together, as mutually illustrative. That of Dr. Daubeny, though much more limited in design and details, is characterised by the various learning and industry which are found in the former writings of this zealous naturalist ; and we shall have occasion now and then to refer to it in its bearing on the sub- ject before us. The author of the larger volume is an American gentleman who has held, and still holds, we believe, a high diplomatic position in the service of the United * Abt. VI. — 1. Man and Nature ; or, Physical Geography, as Modi/led by Human Action. By Geoege P. Maesh. London : 1864. 2. Climate : an Inquiry into the Causes of its Differences, and into its Influence on Vegetable Life; coynprising the Substance of Four Lectures delivered before the Natural History Society, Torquay, in February 1863. By Chakles Dattbeny, M.D., F.R.S. 252 MAN AND NATURE. States ; and has further distinguished himself by a valuable work on the 'Origin and Early History of the English Language.' We always hail with satisfac- tion any addition to the science or literature of the world coming from our Transatlantic brethren. What- ever the issue or effects of the bloody struggle now in progress in America — a problem which time alone can fully solve — we shall still stand in closer relationship to this remarkable people than to any other nation of the earth. The terms of ' common origin,* ' common language,' and ' common literature ' have become the hackneyed phraseology of public meetings and after- dinner speeches, but they nevertheless denote facts which are destined to be of deep interest in the future history of the world. The vast territory and popula- tion, united but four years ago under a single Govern- ment, can never, we believe, recover the unity they have lost. Had none of the causes of this war ex- isted, we doubt whether the American Constitution, or indeed any constitution, could have sustained the enormous pressure upon its powers which twenty years more of growing population and diverging local in- terests would have engendered. But whether two nations, or half-a-dozen nations, emerge out of the present crisis, one future event will be the same — the great North American continent, prolific in all that pertains to the growth of man, will nurture a popula- tion large as that of total Europe, educated generally into a higher grade of civil and religious liberty, speak- ing one language, and perpetuating through this lan- guage the many glories of our early and later literature. MAN AND NATUKE. 253 The Federals of the present day will not look to this futurity for America save through the restoration of the Union. We, on the other hand, strongly incline to see it in a division of territorial governments on that great continent. We believe that time, with its many accidents, and especially the feebleness of the central Government, would inevitably bring about future disruption, even were it not to occm- as the result of the present war, of which the Slavery ques- tion has been the motive with many, with some the pretext. That which is inevitable (and thus many wise Americans both of the present and past generation have regarded it) is often best encountered before time has so entangled the question as to render any safe solu- tion impossible. This topic may seem alien to the volume before us, and yet it is not so. In treating of ' Physical Geo- graphy as Modified by Human Action,' Mr. Marsh derives numerous illustrations from the continent of his own birth ; and reasonably as well as naturally so, since N"orth America is that portion of the globe where the most rapid changes have been effected by human prowess, and where man still finds the largest scope for the growth of population and power. We may perhaps think that a slower progress would have been more salutary ; but human impulses ride over all theories and maxims, and Europe has hurried forth to people the prairies, and glut the rising cities with races having very shght kindred with the primitive settlers of the country. This mixed people, however, has its destiny in the future history of the world. Without 254 MAN AND NATUEE. looking for those Utopian commonwealths which have never existed but in the brains of philosophers and philanthropists, we see enough, even in the sad ex- perience of this war, to show how great is the energy and expansive activity of the race ; how much they are certain yet to accomphsh in moulding nature to their purposes, and changing the aspects of the great con- tinent they inhabit. America and Australia are the two fields in which the intelligence and inventions of our own age find their widest apphcation. The ordi- nary growth of centuries is here compressed into two or three generations, and the surface of the earth sub- mitted to changes which have no parallel in the earher history of nations. In looking at the subject of Mr. Marsh's volume, as expounded by its title, we find something like an antithesis to the scheme of that larger work of Mr. Buckle which was brought to an end by his premature death. In two former articles of this Eeview we dealt fully, and we believe fairly, with the theory propounded and the arguments projQTered in this remarkable work. Seeking to maintain his thesis that history may be raised, approximately at least, to the character of one of the exact sciences, Mr. Buckle founded his main argument on the assumption that man is a mere agent, pliant if not passive, under the physical laws and ex- ternal influences which surround him on earth. He brought to the illustration of this doctrine a vast array of learning, famihar or unfamiliar, exact or inexact — a task easy in some respects, since amidst the enormous number of events and relations crowded into the circle MAN AND NATUEE. 255 of human life on the globe, there may readily be found such as will serve to vindicate any paradox whatsoever. That propounded by Mr. Buckle has been adopted, in terms even less qualified, by writers of later date. The government of the world has been described as accom- pHshed by immutable laws ; and the social conditions, changes, and progress of man represented as not less controlled by these laws than his bodily conformation and growth. In the articles just referred to we showed the various errors as to fact which have been used in support of this theory, and the one-sided character of the argument throughout. We have reason to beheve that Mr. Buckle himself, in the progress of his work, grew distrustful of his own earlier views, and saw that in seeking to make a science out of the history of man- kind he had no solid foundation or materials for so vast a superstructure. The building tottered under his hands while he was yet at work upon it. The tendency of Mr. Buckle's work was to assert the supremacy of the material conditions of existence over human history and the mind of man ; that of Mr. Marsh is to assert the supremacy of the mind of man over the material elements of the globe. The theme taken up by him, while regarding the relations of Man to the natural world from an opposite point of view, is more limited in its pretensions, and descriptive rather than theoretical in kind. It has further the merit of being well-defined in its general objects. The questions put before us are for the most part simple and precise. What has man done, what may man still do, with pur- pose or without purpose, to change for better or worse 256 MAN AJS^D NATURE. the physical conditions of the earth upon which his lot has been cast ? But while thus giving our own defini- tion of the subject, it is fair to let Mr. Marsh himself speak of the design he has had in view : — The object of the present vohime is : to indicate the character and, approximately, the extent of the changes pro- duced by human action in the physical conditions of the globe we inhabit ; to point out the dangers of imprudence and the necessity of caution in all operations which, on a large scale, interfere with the spontaneous arrangements of the organic or the inorganic world ; to suggest the possibility and the importance of the restoration of disturbed harmonies and the material improvement of waste and exhausted regions ; and incidentally to illustrate the doctrine that man is, both in kind and degree, a power of a higher order than any other of the forms of animated life, which, like him, are noiuished at the table of bounteous nature. The scheme thus indicated will be seen to em- brace within itself a vast variety of particular objects, and many questions not yet settled by experience. It is connected in every part with the physical sciences, as well as with the intellectual and social conditions of man, and has for its business to expound the recipro- cities of action between the two. Some of the ques- tions it involves are those which press closely upon our very existence ; while others concern those higher grades of civilisation which have so marvellously subjected the forces of nature to the higher energies of man. The design, then, of Mr. Marsh's work, though it might have been more happily expressed, is one of practical interest and value. We would willingly MAN AND NATURE. 257 speak favourably of its fulfilment ; but this cannot be done without some qualification. We have no fault to find with his style, which is generally clear and sometimes eloquent. We have much also to commend of zeal and industry in the collection of facts, and of entire honesty in his manner of using them— a high merit, whatever be the matter under discussion. But what we find reason to regret is, that having appro- priated a worthy subject, and one of comparative novelty, he should have deprived his work of much of its value by the inartistic way in which he has put his materials together, rendering it thereby equally diffi- cult to read and to remember them. There is what we may best describe as a want of haMone to the volume. Some part of this default may probably be due to the detached and fragmentary manner in which his information has been collected — something also to the fact that Mr. Marsh has obviously an imperfect knowledge of the physical sciences, and is wanting, therefore, in that exactness of method and strictness of induction which are now required on all subjects coming into association with them. His proofs are often trivial from their limited locality, and not always duly balanced as to authority and value ; and he fre- quently omits such as might w^ell have superseded those upon which he dwells for the support of his argument. We have further to complain of deficiency as re- gards the mere technicalities of book-making. The volume is prefaced by a copious list of works consulted by. our author, attesting in this his zeal and industry ; S 258 MAN AND NATUBE. but we find no table of contents, nor any sufficient indication of the scheme followed in the body of the work. The want of these usual aids is a serious im- pediment to the reader, and may have contributed in part to that fragmentary character of the work to which we have alluded. The heading of the chapters is copious ; but these are broken again into numerous short paragraphs, with a separate heading to each — a plan leading to frequent repetition and a want of con- tinuity in the whole. We can hardly note it as a fault, but it is a pecu- liarity in Mr. Marsh's work, that he has thrown fully half of its substance into the form of notes. Many of these notes are references to authorities, but many others are reflections of the author himself, and often of such value as to merit more diligent perusal than the text which suggests them. Numerous illustrations, as we have already stated, are drawn from the Ameri- can continent, the largest exponent of the growing dominion of man on the surface of the globe. Mr. Marsh shows himself a keen commentator on the habits and peculiarities of his countrymeu, and very candid in his avowal of what he thinks might be amended. In one passage, with a note annexed to it (p. 328), he speaks strongly of the instability of American life, and closes his comments with something very like an aspii'ation after change in the American method of conveying land by inheritance: — All human institutions, associate arrangements, and modes of life have their cliaracteristic imperfections. The natural, perhaps the necessary defect of ours, is their insta- MAN AND NATUEE. 259 bility, their want of fixedness, not in form only, but even in spirit. The face of physical nature in the United States sharesL this incessant fluctuation, and the landscape is as variable as the habits of the population. It is time for some abatement in the restless love of change which characterises us, and makes us rather a nomade than a sedentary people. ... It is rare that a middle-aged American dies in the house where he was born, or an old man even in that which he has built ; and this is scarcely less true of the rural dis- tricts, where every man owns his habitation, than of the city, where the majority live in hired houses. This life of inces- sant flitting is unfavourable for the execution of permanent improvements of every sort, and especially of those which, like the forest, are slow in repaying the capital expended on them. It requires a very generous spirit in a landholder to plant a wood or a farm he expects to sell, or which he knows will pass out of the hands of his descendants at his death. The general comments we have made on Mr. Marsli's work will show that it is one difficult to analyse in detail. We may better serve our readers by bringing before them our own more succinct view of the great questions it touches upon, and the con- clusions which have been reached, or are yet before us for attainment. To superficial enquirers it may seem a matter of simple and easy evidence to denote the changes and conditions of the earth's surface which are due to human agency. But this is far from being the case. Many collateral questions and issues enter into the problem, and the objects of enquiry are so many and so complex that it is often exceedingly difficult to disengage the truth. If any prehminary proof of this were needed, it might be found in the consideration that man has a double faculty allotted to him on the s 2 260 MAN AND NATURE. earth — he creates and he destroys. We have to deal with what he does^ and what he undoes, in the world of nature around him. And the modes of action in each case are often so indirect, and so little guided by reason or intention — so closely blended, moreover, with the operations of Nature herself — that our con- clusions are constantly at fault, even on points of greatest practical interest. The judgments of one generation are contradicted by the more matured and larger experiences of the next. In the summary view we are about to offer the form of history must be almost wholly discarded. We can give no initial date to the enquiry ; we know not at what time, chronologically speaking, man first ap- peared on the earth. We are ignorant, or only scantily informed, as to the state of the earth when human existence first dawned upon it. The 'A/o^'Vj that mysterious term, translatable into every language, because common to all human thought, is in this par- ticular case, as in so many others, far beyond the scope of human research. We have heard and read much lately on this question of the antiquity of man on the globe. Putting aside that theory of our own time, which solves it by assuming his gradual deriva- tion from mammaha lower in the scale of animal life, we yet have not facts sufficient to furnish any more certain answer, as far as time is concerned. The re- cent discoveries of human implements and bones in caverns and elsewhere, associated with the remains of animal species now extinct, have disclosed a compara- tive antiquity of man (possibly also a lower grade of MAN AND NATURE. 261 humanity) far greater than we derive from any written record of his history. But we can bring no numbers with which to specify this earher date ; and while facts are every day multiplying upon us, much is yet needed for that thorough confirmation which science requires. The whole enquiry, though it has gained a sort of specialty for the moment, merges in that larger sub- ject which has received the cumbrous name of Palaeontology — a part of knowledge, we must add, however it be named, which forms one of the most wonderful exploits of human intelligence as directed to the natural history of the globe. ISTor can we do much more than vaguely speculate on the state of the earth's surface when Man appeared upon it. Geology is the only school to which we can go for information here. This science, aided by zoology and botany, has made the marvellous disclosures, to which we have just alluded, of those successive stages through which, during ages beyond all estimate, the visible crust of om^ globe has passed before assuming its present state and aspect. We have successive faunas and floras thus opened out to our inspection, numerous almost as those of the actual world — detached in parts by time and intervening catastrophes, yet linked to- gether as a whole in the manifest scheme of creation. Whether the changes in them from one period to another belong to separate acts of creative power, or to evolutions and transmutations of species ever going on but hidden from us in certain steps of their progress, is the question which has started into active litigation among the naturalists of our day. We are not con- 262 MAN AND NATURE. cerned with it here otherwise than as regards a fact recognised under any view, viz., that there has been a general progress, as time went on, towards higher organisation and capacities of existence. Taking the animal kingdom as our example, we find the series variously broken, and the inferior and simpler forms of earlier date continuing to coexist with the later and higher. But the tendency in the series is ever up- wards ; bringing its higher members, as regards bodily structure, into close contact with Man, the highest in the scale. His earliest existence is contemporaneous with some animal species now extinct, but which had near affinity to species still present on the earth. Others have become extinct even within the time of human record. Nevertheless, for our argument it may fairly be assumed that the aspect of animal life, coeval with the first appearance of Man, did not greatly differ, in forms at least, from that we now see around us. Of the numbers, however, and distribution of these animal forms over the then existing lands and waters of the globe we are less able to speak with assurance. It may be considered probable that the animals since domesticated for human purposes were proportionally less numerous during the infancy of Man than those which are either useless to him, or with which it is his lot to struggle under the ruder conditions of life. But any conjecture beyond this would be bald speculation, unsupported by facts. The remark appHes equally to the vegetable covering of the earth at the period in question. The discoveries made in fossil botany have led to its classification into four or five successive floras, MAN AND NATURE. 263 corresponding in some sort with the kindred series of animal life ; but more distinctly marked by the char- acters which changes of climate have impressed upon these wonderful records of ages gone by. The peculiar and proftise vegetation, the gigantic ferns and lycopo- diaceffi of the coal formation, belong to a climate hotter than that to which their products now so abundantly minister light and heat. In the fossil flora of the tertiary strata we find ourselves more closely approach- ing to that of our own time, in the proportions as well as in the families and species of the vegetable world. Though forced to admit a long interval of time and change, including the so-called glacial period, between the newest of the Pleiocene strata and the human epoch, we have reason to beheve that this approach to existing vegetation still went on, and that the earliest of our race found the earth clothed with trees and herbs not greatly differing in kind from those which now cover its surface. It is probable, from various considerations, that the forests of this period were very widely extended, and that the Conifer^e especially formed a large proportion of this forest growth. We may remark, as worthy of note here, that in the peat- mosses of Denmark (which show in succession down- wards the vestiges of the Iron, Bronze, and Stone Ages of human implements, and thence inferentially the succession of different races of men) the lower or Stone stratum abounds in trunks of the pine and fir only ; while those of the oak are largely found in the Bronze period, and of the beech (now the predominant tree of the country) in the Iron. 264 MAN AND NATURE. While speculating on the climate and conditions of the earth's surface at the time most nearly coeval with the advent of Man, we are bound to admit the difficulty of the problem which the glacial period brings before us. Our eminent geologist, Sir C. Lyell, has bestowed all his ability and zeal in seeking to decipher the probable causes of this great catastrophe — the inter- position, between two periods of higher temperature, of a long period of such cold as to cover much of our Northern hemisphere (and proofs to the same effect have lately come to us from the Southern) with glaciers, the magnitude of which is very feebly pictured by those we now look upon in the Alps and Greenland seas. He has sought to connect this enquiry with his larger re- searches into changes of climate as affected by altered proportions of land and sea in different geological eras. But the line of discovery here has not yet fairly touched the ground. The astronomical relations of our planet give no aid towards a solution. Its internal condition, as a molten mass crusted over, and losing heat, as we presume it to have been lost through prior ages by radiation into space, while plausibly explaining some phenomena, leaves others in the same darkness as be- fore. The total question, including its relation to the human race, is one that science has not hitherto solved, but to which many avenues are open, and a crowd of naturalists pressing forwards upon them. We have thus far been but upon the threshold of the subject which forms the material of Mr. Marsh's volume. Yet these prehminary views are necessary to MAN AND NATURE. 265 the completeness of the picture, and to a right compre- hension of the influences which this new element of human life has had on the physical conditions of the earth's surface. To the animal instincts which before had rule in the world we now find added the higher faculty of intelhgent design — of mental superinduced on bodily force. This is the subject with which we are liere more directly concerned. We are called upon to indicate the extent, or what may better perhaps be termed the hmits, of Man's power over the conditions of the natural world around him ; and then to show what he has already done, or may attain hereafter, in effect of this power. We desire the more to mark clearly the several points of the argument, since the want of such method is the defect which will be most felt by the readers of the volume before us. Pii'st, then, what is the extent, and what are the limits, of human power over the earth we inhabit? The simplest division of this large question is that which regards the influence of Man, severally, upon the inorganic elements around him, and upon matter organised into animal and vegetable life. There is close inter-relation between these objects, as will at once be obvious ; but, for the sake of clearness, they may better be regarded separately ; and in such division the rela- tion of Man to inorganic existence, whether of matter or force, is that which comes first into view. His in- fluence, as the head of the hving creation, on other forms and attributes of fife, will be best considered in sequel to the former. The atmosphere, the waters, and the superficial crust 266 MAN AND NATURE. of the earth, are the portions of the material inorganic world with which we are connected by reciprocal rela- tions essential to our very existence. No illustrations are needed in proof of this general fact. But beyond it lies another, equally certain though more obscure to our conception, viz., the existence of certain forces, or active powers of nature — light, heat, electricity, gravitation, &c. — ^which we cannot define as material, though they are known to us only in connexion with matter, and through their several actions upon it. These so-called forces (for we have at present no fitter name for them), while governing and constraining in various ways the power and action of Man, are in other and endless ways submitted to his intelhgence, and become the instruments with which he works in the material world. The relations of matter to force, as well as the correlation of different forms of force, and the con- nexion of all with organisation and vitality, are the problems most strenuously pursued by the philosophers of our own day. Experimental truths and metaphy- sical uncertainties come here into close contact, and too often engender shallow devices of language to shelter imperfect knowledge. But the search after truth by experiment and strict induction is now the rule of all science; and words are used by wise men but as counters, to be put aside or changed when they have fulfilled their temporary purposes. We are carrying this general view far beyond the horizon which our author has been content to take as his boundary. But we feel that by thus enlarging its scope we give to the subject a higher purpose as a MAN AND NATURE. 267 part of the history of mankind ; and bring it into such connexion with the physical sciences as to increase the hkehhood of practical usefulness hereafter. We may remark further, that many of the physical relations just adverted to, complex though they are, may be reduced to simpler and more familiar terms for the objects of our argument. The single word. Climate, for in- stance, expresses one of the most important relations of man to the natural world around him — a relation which concerns human existence in its every part. But this word, Chmate, taken in its largest sense, compre- hends within itself all those elements and attributes of matter and force, the mutual influences and actions of which produce the phenomena so familiar to us under this single expression. Earth, water, and air — as they are acted upon by heat and light, and more obscurely by electricity, the chemical and cohesive forces, gravi- tation and the axial rotation of the globe — furnish the material for all those complex conditions of seasons, land and ocean winds, tides, currents, rains, thunder- storms and hurricanes, snow and ice, amidst which we live, and which we are ever seeking (civilised and savage man alike) to mould into what may best con- duce to the well-being of hfe. Even seen through its more homely details of habitation, clothing, and food, there is something great in this unceasing toil and struggle with the elements around. But the contest becomes of higher kind when man takes these very elements into his service,, and gains fresh dominion over the earth through their aid. Seeing how various and vast are the forces acting, and the materials acted 268 MAN AND NATURE. upon — the latter diiFused over the globe, the former not limited to our narrow sphere, but, some of them at least, energetic througliout all sidereal space — ^we may well find much of grandeur in this appropriation to human purposes of powers above human compre- hension. The instincts of inferior animals act through these powers, but without consciousness of them, and with no ability to control or direct them by intelli- gence. We must not, however, carry too far this assump- tion of superiority. We are seeking now to define what Man can do in modifying the physical conditions of the earth ; and Climate comes in among the first points in question. Its intimate relation to all other objects of physical science has just been noticed ; and the term Meteorology expresses that independent branch of science designed to embrace these relations. The name is one inherited fi:om antiquity — partially and ignorantly applied in its origin ; now, like many other cognate terms, amplified in its meaning, to satisfy the exigencies of growing knowledge and a higher philosophy. But meteorology is yet far from taking rank among the exact sciences. Notwithstanding all that has been done of late years, and the better defi- nition of the objects sought for, it is still in compara- tive infancy as a branch of human knowledge. We can but partially and doubtfully explain the events it records. The power of predicting them is limited to certain periodical phenomena ; and to those more local sequences and averages which we are wont to note without being able to interpret them. As respects, MAN AND NATURE. 269 indeed, the climate of particular countries and places, all common notions are singularly vague, and common phraseology still more so. Tables of observation are perpetually correcting the errors of ignorance, and of thfxt fashion in belief which mixes itself, more or less, in all matters of worldly concernment. Professor Dove, of Berhn, justly described by Dr. Daubeny as the highest authority in meteorology, has collected many most valuable results in reference to the phenomena of Climate ; and has well indicated by his own methods the manner of research best fitted to extend the science and render it more exact. That much will yet be done in fulfilment of these objects, we regard as certain. The very complexity of the physical relations concerned in the enquiry, while greatly enhancing its difficulties, does at the same time give more various access to the truths sought for. Meanwhile, the admission we are obliged to make of our imperfect understanding of these phenomena, so vast in scale and so complex in action, is virtually an admission that Man can do but little to control them by any exercise of his own powers. Such at least is the case as regards all the greater elements concerned. He cannot alter the course, or arrest the energy, of those great atmospheric and ocean currents which sweep around the globe — beneficent, or even neces- sary, in their general influence, destructive only in their excess. He cannot change the total amount of light and lieat derived from the sun, though he can vary in different ways its local distribution. He has no power, save indirectly and in limited localities, over 270 MAN AND NATUEE. that great and never-ceasing circuit of the waters of the globe which is carried on by evaporation and by rains. Though he has subjected the wonderful ele- ment of electricity to wonderful uses, yet has he little or no control over it in the wide compass of those atmospheric and other changes in which it bears a part so large, yet even now so little understood. The same remark applies to the magnetic force as a mode of electric action ; pervading, we have reason to believe, the whole solar system, and concerned probably in many more terrestrial phenomena than have yet been assigned to this cause. Over gravitation, a force chiefly strong in its concentration and by its fixed and un- ceasing action over all matter, Man may seem to have acquired more control ; but it is in every case gained by the expenditure of some other energy, mechanical or chemical, brought into momentary conflict with this great motive-power of the universe. Such, briefly expressed, are the limits to human power, in its relation to the elements, which in their combination form the various climates of the earth. It would require a volume, and one more ample and complete than that now before us, to denote the ways through which, directly or indirectly, man has sought to extend these hmits, and to gain a higher mastery over the inorganic as well as the living world. Matter and force being ever the same in absolute amount (a modern doctrine repeating more explicitly one of ancient date), his ability consists in setting in action those changes and translations of which matter and forces are susceptible, to fulfil purposes necessary or MAN AND NATURE. 271 beneficial to his own existence. The fit^LS /cat SiaX- Xctft^ liiyivTo)v expresses briefly what is his deahng with a large class of objects in the natiu^al world. We shall touch upon some of these points hereafter ; but meanwhile must speak somewhat further of the in- fluence he has found means to exercise over local chmate— a matter of deep concernment to the existence and well-being of mankind. We say local climate^ because it is only in special localities, and not generally over the globe, that this influence can be brought into action. And it is well worthy of note that the great agent in any such change belongs to the living world, and to the domain of ve- getable hfe — one that Man can mould to his uses both by propagation and destruction, yet hitherto only with vague knowledge in what these uses consist. It is the forest which thus actively ministers to the climatic conditions of the earth ; which, extirpated by the axe or restored by planting, changes both the face of na- ture and the distribution and destinies of human life. This simple name of Forest will hardly bring to the casual reader a conception of all that it implies ; of the vast extent of the earth's surface thus covered in every zone, to the very confines of the arctic ckcle ; of the various aspects and qualities of this great forest mantle, and of its relation to all the moving elements of the natural world. It is impossible to estimate, even by loose approximation, the actual extent of surface so occupied. We have given reasons for believing that the earth was largely covered with wood at the time when Man first became its denizen. And though in 272 MAN AXD NATURE. our own day we find in tropical countries vast regions almost treeless, the balance is fully struck on otlier continents by those wide tracts of close and continuous forests into which no lumberer's axe has ever pene- trated. Even in Europe, where intelhgence and industry have been most active in seeking fresh space for human existence, we may affirm that one-half the total area is covered with woods, either widely continuous, as in Eussia, Sweden, Norway, and Poland ; or broken into detached forests, as in Germany, Turkey, and France ; or into smaller patches of timber, as in our own island. A considerable part of Mr. Marsh's volume is occu- pied with this topic — one most natural and reasonable to an American writer. On the North American con- tinent the vast regions east of the Mississippi, stretch- ing northwards through Canada into the boinidless solitudes of the Hudson's Bay Territory, are still covered with forests which set at defiance all common measurements of space. The devastation of a pine- forest by fire will often give to the traveller a more vivid perception of extent than whole days of passage through them. We ourselves have seen, in the wide regions of the Upper Ottowa, an area of nearly sixty miles in length and ten or fifteen miles in width, which had been thus devastated by a single fire carried by an impetuous wind over this long line of destruction. Such a wilderness of gaunt perpendicular trunks, naked of all branches and blackly charred, shows the depth and density of a forest under an aspect never to be forgotten. America, in fact, is the country of the world where MAN AND NATURE. 273 the most vigorous struggle has existed — and, despite war, is still going on — between a new and energetic people and the native covering of the soil. The forest here must be extirpated or thinned, to make room for a more profitable vegetation ; and a striking feature in American landscape, even in the older States, is the crop of corn growing luxuriantly amidst the stumps of ancient trees. But while this destruction of the native woods of the country is yet in active progress, some prospective alarm has arisen lest it should be carried too far. And as this question involves very directly the influences which forests have upon the climate and phy- sical conditions of a country, we will quote part of a long passage from Mr. Marsh, who is himself a strenuous supporter of forest claims over the globe, and in more than one place presses strongly his complaints against mankind at large, as the habitual destroyers of what Nature has done to enrich and beautify its surface : — With the disappearance of the forest all is changed. At one season the earth parts with its warmth by radiation to an open sky, and receives at another an immoderate heat from the imobstructed rays of the sun. Hence the climate becomes excessive, and the soil is alternately parched hj the fervors of summer and seared by the rigors of winter. Bleak winds sweep imresisted over its surface, drift away the snow that sheltered it from the frost, and dry up its scanty mois- ture. The precipitation becomes as irregular as the tempera- ture ; the melting snows and vernal rains, no longer absorbed by a loose and bibulous vegetable mould, rush over the frozen surface, and pour down the valleys seawards, instead of filling a retentive bed of absorbent earth, and storing up moisture to feed perennial springs. The soil is bared of its covering of leaves, deprived of the fibrous rootlets which held T 274 MAN AND NATURE. it together, dried and pulverised by sun and wind, and at last exhausted by new combinations. . . . The rivulets, wanting their former regularity of supply, and deprived of the protecting shade of woods, are heated, evaporated, and reduced in their summer currents, but swollen to raging torrents in autumn and spring. . . . The washing of the soil from the mountains leaves bare ridges of sterile rock ; and the rich organic mould which covered them, now swept down into the damp low grounds, promotes a luxuriance of aquatic vegetables that breeds fever and more insidious forms of mortal disease by its decay. ^ Such, somewhat abridged, is the theme of our American Evelyn ; in style rather florid and ambitious, yet doubtless containing much that is true and of prac- tical value. He recurs to this topic in every part of the volume, and fortifies his position by various autho- rities, ancient and modern.^ Here, nevertheless, we must bring in the old claim of audi alteram partem, as essential to truth. Mr. Marsh bestows his zeal on one side of the case, and generalises too much upon it, without duly regarding those many exceptions which Nature is ever suggesting or forcing upon us. He seems to forget in his large conclusions that to preserve the native forest is in many countries to narrow the space allotted by Providence to the growth and maintenance * To these various effects of forest vegetation our author might per- haps have added its influence on the electrical relations of the atmosphere and earth — an influence greater, we believe, than is usually supposed. But though certain as fact, the particular conditions it involves are still so little known that their omission may reasonably be justified. ^ One of the most recent and valuable works on this subject seems to be that of Hohenstein (18G0), entitled 'Der Wald.' Our old English writer, Harrison, has a curiously quaint chapter on the woods and marshes of England, complaining much of the decay of the former j and other ancient English authorities might be quoted to the same effect. MAN AND NATURE. 275 of mankind. Finding 'tongues in trees,* he allows them to speak somewhat too loudly on their own be- half, and to suppress the claims of those cereal crops and pastures which the industry of man is seeking in so many places to substitute for them. In truth, this relation of forests to climates and other conditions of the earth in which human interests are involved is a matter hardly to be reached by gene- ral maxims. To gain anything like fair practical results it must be made a question of countries and localities — of the extent and relative proportion of surface thus occupied — of the character of the forests themselves — of the character of the country at large, whether mountainous or level, near to the sea or distant from it — of the nature of the rocks and soil on its surface — and of those various incidents of local climate which belong to other natural causes. The practical question is one widely diiferent as applied to the forests of Scan- dinavia, and to those woods of the Apennines, in Southern Italy, the extirpation of which has doubtless contributed, with other causes, to defertilise and de- populate the valleys of that region — very different, also, as applied to the interminable forests of Upper Canada or Kew Brunswick, and to the residual masses of wood in New York and Pennsylvania. We may add, as further example, that timber growing on hills or steep acclivities, and that of plains, whether marshy or arid, can never be brought in illustration of any equal or similar influence on the physical conditions of a country. Every region has its particular aptitudes, and a single theory can in no sense be applied to all. T 2 276 MAN AND NATURE. We may, however, fairly join our author in affirm- ing that vegetation, under the form of woods, is neces- sary, more or less, to the well-being of every country ; and that many regions, once fertile, have become otherwise by the loss or curtailment of this magnificent provision of Nature for their covering. And as a practical corollary to these facts we may speak with assurance of the power Man has of gaining or restoring lands, thus barren from nature or human improvidence, by planting fresh forests where none now exist. With due attention to soil, climate, and other local circum- stances, he may rejoice in the conviction that he is thus providing for the good of his posterity, if not for his own ; ' Serit arbores, quse alteri sa^culo prosint/ This remark especially applies to the tracts of arid sand so numerous over the globe, even in close contiguity to high cultivation, as the Landes of France, the Dunes and Steppes of other European countries. A covering of well-selected woods, or even of such plants as the bent-grass, would in time give to these sterile sands a new and happier soil ; and this attained, the axe might come in to make over to the agriculturist a part of the surface thus freshly provided for his labours. Experi- ments to this effect we believe to be now in progress in several countries, and they will doubtless be extended hereafter.^ ^ At the recent meeting of the British Association we understand that a communication has been made regarding an extensive region in the Orange River territory of South Africa, bearing marks of having been formerly well wooded, but now utterly treeless and barren. The progress of colonisation northwards may make it expedient to remedy this by fresh planting; and such we believe to be the suggestion of the gentleman, Mr. Fox Wilson, who has presented this memoir. MAN AND NATURE. 277 We have dwelt on this subject at some length, from the prominence Mr. Marsh has given to it in his volume. We now come to other points illustrative of the dominion which Man exercises on the earth — illus- trations more definite and intelligible than the complex conditions of chmate, and the doubtful question how far, and in what way, these are modified by the forest vegetation which Man can create or destroy. Most of these illustrations belong to the age in which we are now living. All need to be brought into relation with it. The last century — the last fifty years more espe- cially — ^has established a new era of human power ; in which, by aid of fresh elements subjected to command, and fresh impulse given to those of older use, more has been done to subjugate the earth and ocean to human purposes than in the total period forming the prior history of mankind. We must begin by carrying our readers for a few minutes below the surface — to those wonderful works of mining genius and industry upon which England, beyond all other countries on the globe, relies for her prosperity and greatness. In mines as they are now worked we have an admirable example of dominion gained over the natural world by the piu-e force of human intelligence. In the profound depth and ex- tent of many of them, in the magnitude and perfection of the machinery employed, and in the methods by which air is given to the mine and water removed from it, we find every element of grandeur and suc- cessful energy. It is not possible here to go into details ; and yet, seeing how little these things are known or 278 UXN AND NATURE. estimated, we cannot forbear saying a few words about the mines of England more especially, as those which exemplify on the largest scale all others of the world besides. Our pecuniary interests are deeply involved in this branch of industry, scientific education has fairly advanced among us, and travelhng is almost superfluously easy from one end of the island to the other. Yet how few have knowledge of, or care to in- spect, these great subterranean and submarine work- ings, which bring the hidden wealth of our country to the surface to vivify us with light and heat, to furnish material and machinery for our manufactures, and motive power for every part of the globe ! When we say that this indifference is strange, we use the lightest term that can well be apphed to it. According to our present knowledge. Great Britain contains within its scanty area a greater variety and abundance of minerals serving to the uses of man than any other equal space in the world. We do not pro- fess to number the metals we now possess, since modern science, by disclosing the metallic bases of the earths and alkalis, and making known four new metals through the wonderful medium of the spectrum ana- lysis, has swelled the list of these bodies — elementary as we still must call them — to a formidable length. But of those metals and minerals which are worked by mines on a scale commensurate with their value to mankind — ^iron, copper, lead, tin, zinc, coal, rock-salt, &c. — we possess an abundance really marvellous in its concentration on this small island. We do not men- tion gold or silver ; though it may perhaps surprise MAN AND NATURE. 279 many of our readers to learn that gold has been found in more than thirty counties of Great Britain and Ireland ; and that by improved metallurgical processes more than 600,000 ounces of silver are annually obtained from the working of our numerous lead- mines.^ We must speak but cursorily, and in round num- bers, of the economical value of our greater mines. The official return of their total value, as derived from those of every kind in working last year, gives no less a sum than 36,000,000/. — a cogent proof, drawn from a single small island, of the mastery Man has obtained over the mineral world that hes below his feet. Coal, that astonishing product of an ancient vegetable crea- tion, comes at the head of the estimate. From an area of about 6,000 square miles of coal-fields m Great Britain, and from mines not fewer than 3,000 in num- ber, we at this time draw nearly 90 millions of tons annually, for our own uses and those of the world at large — a consumption increasing every year, as men multiply, and steam and other appliances of heat be- come more necessary to do their service on land and sea. The question has of late been often and urgently asked, how long can our English coal-fields suffice for this vast and augmenting drain upon them ? Calcula- tion has been actively appHed to answer it, but not quite satisfactorily, inasmuch as the estimates have varied from 400 or 500 to nearly 1,000 years.'^ We 1 The quartz lodes now worked for gold near Dolgelly, in Wales, have produced in some years as much as 5,000 oz. of this metal. Certain veins here have yielded 12 or 14 oz. from a ton of ore. ^ We may refer here to a valuable memoir hy Mr. Edward Hull on 280 • MAN AND NATURE. the more willingly accept the latter number, as it comes to us justified by the very recent invention of a machine for cutting coal in the mine, which not only executes its work far more speedily and savingly than the human arm, but, what is of far greater moment, gives working access to some of those beds of coal, less than three feet in thickness, which have hitherto been put out of calculation, as incapable of yielding any profit. As these thinner beds generally occupy areas commen- surate with the thicker, the great practical value of such inventions will be readily understood.^ Concur- rently with new methods for economising heat, and possibly with the power of working at stiU. greater depths under the magnesian limestone, they promise to retard greatly the arrival of that time — certain, how- ever, in the end to come — when the coal-beds of Eng- land will be known only as a part of its past history. It is as useless to speculate on the effects of this desti- tution as on the general condition of mankind at the time when it shall arrive. Still holding to England for illustration, we pass by a natural step from coal to iron — that wonderful metal, found now as an element in the photosphere of the coal resources of Great Britain, published in the ' Quarterly Journal of Science' for January last. Mr. Hull adopts the larger estimate noted above, and justifies it by the statistics of each separate coal-field. ^ These coal-cutting machines, with some variations of form, have now, we believe, been profitably applied in two collieries for more than a year. Either steam or condensed air may be used for the engine. In. the former case especially It is coal working directly for its own de- struction. We have not spoken above of the three great North American coal- fields, rivalling European kingdoms in extent, as these vast deposits have yet been only very partially broken in upon by the hand of man. MAN AND NATUEE. 281 the sun, if not in other more distant stars ; and on our own earth subserving to the purposes and power of Man more largely than any other. The chief function of gold and silver is to represent the value of human commodities in exchange. The great function of iron is as an instrument to create these commodities, and to facilitate and perfect their use. But it would be mere declamation to expatiate here on the value of this metal to mankind. Our business is only to state briefly what England has done, and is yet doing, in raising iron ores from beneath her soil, and giving them by her furnaces and forges those several forms of commercial value which are every day becoming more various and more perfect in adaptation. A short statement, given in round numbers, will best show the progress of this great branch of national industry. In 1740, about 17,000 tons of iron were produced in England, from 60 furnaces. In 1808, about 200,000 tons; in 1820, about 400,000; in 1827, 690,000 tons, from 284 furnaces. In 1848, nearly two millions of tons, of which more than a quarter were derived from South Wales. The increase has continued, with only transient interruptions, to the present time, when we beheve we may safely rate the amount at more than four and a half million tons of annual produce, to supply our own and the demands of the world — an amount, translated into money, of from ten to twelve miUions sterling. Had we space for statistics we might speak of the great extent of the older iron-fields in South Wales, Staffordshire, Yorkshire, and Scotland ; and of the several recent discoveries of hon ore in 282 MAN AND NATURE. Lincolnshire, Somersetshire, Northamptonshire, &c., which enlarge the area of future labours. Or we might dwell upon those happy inventions of the hot- blast, the Bessemer process, the artifices for economis- ing heat (four-fifths of which were wasted in the oLl processes), and the various methods now used for giving higher value and stability to the qualities of this metal for the service of mankind. We must touch still more shortly on the other metallic treasures of England — the mines of copper, lead, tin, &c. — important though they all are to our national welfare. The last of these three, however, merits a few words of separate notice. Tin is a metal comparatively rare on the globe ; and in Europe is found in working quantity only in Cornwall, Saxony, and Bohemia ; our English county being far the richest in its produce. The annual average of the metal ob- tained here approaches 8,000 tons ; or about 1,200,000/. of marketable value ; a quantity that does not seem likely to be increased. The history of tin has a certain mystery about it, connected as it is with the story of the Phoenician voyages to these remote coasts; and with the large use of bronze, of which tin is an ingre- dient, not merely in the arts of Greece and Eome, but also in the implements of races of an earlier and ruder time, to whom we can give no name or date, save through these implements of their use. Whence or how did these rude denizens of the Bronze Age, whether in the Cimbric peninsula, in the lacustrine villages of Switzerland, or elsewhere, obtain this metal, so rare and valuable even in our own time ? We know that MAN AND NATURE. 283 it was transported in certain quantity from Britain to Italy, across Gaul, by horse -carriage ; but there is no memorial left of these earlier people to show that they had the means either to work mines or to transport to such distances the material gained. The best solution is that afforded by the analogy of tin to gold. The former metal, Hke gold, is found not only in veins with a quartz matrix, but also as a surface deposit under the form known as stream-tin^ the outward interpreter of the wealth below. This probably furnished the metal to earlier ages ; existing then in larger quantity than now and easily obtained ; but, like gold, exhaus- tible in the end as a superficial deposit. As in the case of gold, too, it is uncertain to what depth the tin-ores may be found, even in the primitive veins, which give earliest date to this valuable metal. ^ Of our copper and lead mines we do not further speak than by stating that they produce an aggregate revenue approaching to 2,500,000/. annually. Our rock- salt mines deserve some notice, not from their beauty, in which they are far inferior to the mines of Wielitzka and Salzburg, but from their large annual produce, in different forms, of nearly a million tons of salt; and, further, because we have here an illustration of that human activity which is ever discovering fresh material for human uses. Eock-salt has hitherto been explored and worked in Cheshire only. Within the last year a very deep boring for other purposes has disclosed a bed of this most valuable substance in Northumber- ^ The ancient mining implements found in Cornwall add to the pro- bability that the old workings for tin there were chiefly superficial. 284 MAN AND NATURE. land, affirmed oa good authority to be more than 100 feet in thickness. This mineral treasure will not long be suffered to lie dormant. Depth is no obstacle, for the mining genius of our own day has struggled and succeeded wherever the object was worthy of the effort. We might here, had we room for it, say much more of these wonderful penetrations into the earth, for the acquisition of that which is so valuable under- neath. It would probably be far below the truth to affirm that the increased power and perfection of machines, and notably of the steam-engine, have quadrupled the mining power of England since the beginning of the century. In the Hartz Mountains and Tyrol two or three particular copper mines had been already carried to a depth exceeding 2,000 feet ; but the workings, carried on chiefly by water-power, were found to be unproductive, even with Government aid. Our machinery, involving an amount of steam- power unknown before, has since distanced all other competition in this branch of industry. The mines of this country, freed from the ingress of water by the constant labour of these vast engines, so perfect as to be almost noiseless in their working, have now reached nearly the same great depth ; and even in some cases been carried far underneath the sea, giving access to veins of ore wholly unapproachable but for these powerful aids to human hands. The case is the same with the great coal mines of England. Not merely are the workings more perfect in every part of their eco- nomy, but by virtue of the machinery in present use MAN AND NATURE. 285 they have been carried to greater depths than hereto- fore ; following now in many places the beds of coal as they dip under the niagnesian limestone, and in some instances rivalling the Cornish mines in their extension under the sea. The working of the Enghsh coal mines is wonder- ful, not only in the depths reached, but in the vast extent of many of them, and the admirable pro- visions made for tlieir ventilation. In some of the Northumberland collieries — these being earliest in date, as well as most extensive — -the ventilating blast of air forced down one shaft is made to circulate through thirty or forty miles of subterranean workings before emerging again at another. Well might we wish that a better security could thus, or othervvise, be given against those explosions of fire-damp which every year, from casualty or carelessness, offer such fearful records of calamity ! The deepest coal mine worked in Great Britain is that of Duckinfield, in Cheshire, reaching 2,050 feet, or more than a third of a mile, in its perpendicular depth. ^ But possibly the nearest approach to the centre of the earth — if we may thus speak of a fractional part hardly exceeding i^^qq of the actual distance — is that of a coal mine close to the sea at Wearmouth, descending, we believe, about 1,800 feet below the sea-level. This depth is recorded not only by the great barometric pressure, but by the increasing tem- 1 This extraordinary shaft, 12^ feet in diameter, was completed in 1858, after a labour of ten years. It reaches a bed of excellent coal, nearly five feet in thickness. 286 MAN AND NATURE. perature in coming nearer the central heat of the globe. Here, indeed, we must note one of the most serious obstacles to farther penetration downwards. It is now well known, from observations in mines and artesian wells, that the increase of heat below what may be called the stationary line of temperature is at the rate of 1** of Fahrenheit for every 60 or 65 feet of increasing depth. In several deep copper and coal mines the average heat of the lowest workings reaches 80° to 85°; and one instance, in the Poldice Mine, is noted by Mr. Fox, an eminent authority on this sub- ject, where the thermometer rose to nearly 100°, a temperature incompatible with any form of profitable or even possible human labour. It may seem a small matter to speculate upon, and yet when speaking of changes effected on the earth by human action we cannot discard the effects of forty or fifty million tons of coal bm'nt every year upon the English soil on which we are living. It is the transla- tion, from within the earth to without^ of this enormous amount of carbonaceous matter, with its various che- mical adjuncts. Though not well able to say how all this is disposed of in its various later combinations, we may at least afiirm that a substance like carbon, so large a constituent of life in all its forms, and Jiaving such endless relations to other chemical elements, can- not be wholly inert in the addition it thus makes to the surface without. This is one of the cases where eventual effects may differ from, and go beyond, those more directly obvious to the eye. Such is a mere outline of the changes, taking our MAN AND NATUEE. 287 own country as the example, which man, as a miner, is bringing about on the earth. A still stronger im- press of genius and power is that which is presented by the great railways which now so largely traverse its surface; and by the tunnels, embankments, viaducts, and bridges which contribute to this vast scheme of human intercommunication. Though a generation has scarcely passed by since these works were begun, they are already so familiar to us, that we lose the full sense of their grandeur, and of all they denote of pro- gress in the condition of mankind. Yet how strange the alteration, even to the eye, in the aspect of a country traversed and intersected by these lines of iron-road — vacant and still at one moment, a minute afterwards giving passage to a train, rushing along at the rate of thirty, forty, or fifty miles in the hour, laden with human beings and the commodities of the world. We know no spectacle more striking — ap- palling we might almost call it — than that of an express train thus sweeping by in its course. Accus- tomed as we are to see traction performed by animal labour, there is a peculiar strangeness in witnessing this wonderful trick done without any agent obvious to the eye. We know that the power is in the loco- motive, but the mode of action is unseen, and to most people unknown. It would be needless to dwell on those statistical facts relating to railroads, in England and elsewhere, which are every year pressed upon us in larger figures and more ample details — the amount of capital invested, the length of roads made, the number of miles run, the 288 MAN AND NATURE. number of passengers and tonnage of goods conveyed, and the gross and net profits of the whole. But we may well look for a moment at some of those astonish- ing works to which we have alluded, as created by this change in the locomotion of the world — ^works in which man has attained a higher mastery over nature than even the boldest imagination ever before sug- gested. Take bridges as an example. In our own boyhood we were shown the iron arch over the Wear, at Sunderland, as one of the wonders of England — a structure which the modern tourist would hardly halt to look upon. The suspension bridge over the Menai came next ; a bold and beautiful work, but adapted only to the old system of mail-coach roads. With the invention of the railway and steam locomotion came the tubular bridge over the same strait, a work of less beauty, but more wonderful in its dimensions, and in the new and singular principle of construction due to Mr. Pairbairn, of which it was the first example. Its success emboldened Mr. Stephenson to undertake that far greater work, the tubular bridge of Montreal, little less than two miles in length, and stretching across the wide waters of the St. Lawrence, hardly yet calmed from their rush down the rapids of Lachine. As a monument of grand engineering this bridge is not likely to be surpassed — the less likely as its benefit to the shareholders is far from being commensurate to the cost. Another triumph of human power on the same river is the suspension railway bridge of Niagara, scarcely two miles below the Great Falls, where the St. Lawrence, rushing impetuously, rather than flowing. MAN AND NATUEE. 289 through a deep ravine, is spanned over in mid-air by this bridge, uniting the dominions of Canada and the United States. In another and distant region of Eng- land's power, the East Indian railways show some works of this kind (as the great bridge across the Jumna) almost rivalling those of the Western World. Look further at those admirable constructions, both in Europe and America, by which the railroad is carried across mountain chains, climbing tortuously their steep acclivities, or forced by tunnels through the rock. In the Copiapo Eailway of Chili, the locomotive carries its train 4,070 feet above the sea. In the several rail- roads which cross the Alleghany Mountains the summit- levels are from 2,000 to 3,000 feet. The new Empire of Brazil boasts a work of similar kind, just completed. In the section, now open, of the St. Ander railroad, in Spain, an elevation is reached of 2,524 feet. The Som- mering Pass, between Vienna and Gratz, carries the traveller 3,000 feet above the sea. Tunnels from two to three miles in length are familiar to us in England and elsewhere. That which is now in progress under Mont Cenis has for its object and ambition to win a passage into Italy without crossing the Alps. To the modem engineer the phrase of the poet — Opposiiit natura Alpemque nivemque — comes as an incentive rather than an admonition. It is probable that this object will eventually be accom- plished. But is it worth the accomplishment? We, as old Italian travellers, think not. We can hardly desire, indeed, to fall back upon the time when car- u 290 MAN AND NATURE. riages were taken to pieces for a passage over these mountains. But, on the other hand, we do not desire to exchange the grandeur of a great Alpine pass, and those glories of the first view of Italy which gave exul- tation to Hannibal and his army, for the sullen dark- ness of a tunnel, distinguishable in nothing but its wearisome length from those of our English midland counties. The engineer gains a lasting fame from his work. The traveller gains a few hours of time upon his journey, and emerges into Italy through a hole in a rock ! It may seem ungracious, as well as irrational, to throw even a shade of doubt on the advantages which railways have rendered to mankind. The magnitude of the benefits derived from this great conquest over time and space in the natural world is too obvious to be seri- ously impugned. Commerce, manufactures, and agri- culture gain universally by the change effected ; and the social relations of mankind are enlarged at least, and perhaps improved. But we must admit some few qualifications to this high estimate. Even the traveller does not gain his good without alloy. We quit our homes to see and learn — to gain fresh health and en- joyment — often, it must be owned, to follow fashion or relieve ennui. For all these objects the railway affords facihties before unknown, but almost too great for the worthiest purposes of travel. European tourists, now in number legion^ are hurried from place to place with unwholesome and unprofitable speed — the slaves of trains and time-tables, and imbued with more vivid recollections of stations and crowded hotels than of MAN AND NATURE. 291 countries traversed and cities passed througli. In many persons, it must be added, a habit of restless burry and love of change is thus engendered, injurious in other ways to the well-being of life. These, however, we admit to be exceptional evils, and name them only as such. We are bound to be thankful for inventions of human genius which can carry us in a short day from metropolitan streets and offices to mountains, lakes, and waterfalls ; which bring Mont Blanc and Eome within a month's holiday; and enable the scientific traveller to reach the scene of his labours with less exhaustion of the various appliances of research. The electric telegraph, that close associate and guardian of the railway, has not made such marked changes on the outer face of the earth, but may, never- theless, be mentioned here, as the most marvellous example of the dominion Man has gained over one of the great elements of nature — an element, moreover, scarcely known as such one hundred and fifty years ago. The power we exercise over heat and hght, over chemical and mechanical forces, is limited in space. The electric current — or what, in default of better knowledge, we denominate such — is made to career, with speed hardly translatable into numbers, over continents and underneath seas, performing the behests of man in social life, in commerce, in peace, and in war. It is the very element of lightning — the vis flammea coeli — converted into a messenger, or even, by more recent inventions, into a disciplined writer of human thought and language. We might bring in some qualifications here also as to the utility of tliis u 2 292 MAN AND NATURE. new agent of human intercourse, but our space pre- vents us saying more of what must doubtless be counted the most wonderful discovery of our own time. Canals, though of high antiquity as an invention for transport, have been in great measure superseded by railways. Yet there are two works of this kind — one in contemplation, the otlier partially effected — which derive interest from their magnitude, and from their connexion with the new dominion which steam has given to man over the oceans of the globe. If the Atlantic be ever united to the Pacific, and the Mediter- ranean to the Eed Sea and Indian Ocean, by ship- canals, all will be done that can be done to give speed and certainty to the great circuits of intercourse round the globe. We offer no present opinion on the much- disputed matter of the Suez Canal. Even if successful as a navigable passage across the Isthmus, there yet remains the question of profitable return — one embra- cing too many contingencies to be settled by anticipa- tion. A few years will determine both these points now standing at issue. We have thus spoken of the influence of Man on earth as a miner, mechanician, and engineer. But we cannot quit this topic of his relations to the material world, and the forces which rule or reside in it, with- out speaking of him also as the chemist of the hving creation — and this in the largest sense which modern science has given to a word so small in its original meaning. He does not, indeed, as such, change the outward aspects of the earth, or govern the natural MAN AND NATURE. 293 phenomena to which its surface is subjected. Here, as we have elsewhere explained in speaking of climate, the great chemistry of nature comes into play. Nor has he yet gone far below the surface into the chemistry of life — that mystery of organisation by which vitality is given, and its acts and instincts are carried on. But though there is yet much beyond his reach, chemistry in the hands of Man is one of the highest labours of the human intellect. It becomes the interpreter of nature and natural laws — a science through the re- sources of which he not only analyses the endless exist- ing forms of matter, but under the guidance of laws almost as well-defined as those which govern the plane- tary motions, creates numerous new and energetic compounds, which, as far as we know, have no proto- type elsewhere in creation. This progress of Man in the great province of scientific chemistry is indeed of very recent date, and we can yet hardly discern all its issues. But enough has already been done to show how much of future power will be gained from this source over the material elements around him. No field of discovery can be more fruitful in prospect, enlarged as it is by connexions, ever becoming closer, with all other departments of physical science. We have hitherto, in prosecution of our subject, been chiefly occupied with the outline of what Man has effected by his action on the inanimate world. An outline it may well be called, for how impossible to describe those complex connexions which exist between human life and the forces to which this life is subjected ! 294 MAN AND NATURE. We have now to speak of the relations of Man to the Hving world by which he is surrounded. This topic, vast in itself, admits of being treated either as a matter of profound philosophy, or as one of close practical concern to mankind — in this resembling many other questions which modern science places before us. The speculative part is that which regards the intention of the Creator, in bringing Man into this close conjunction with other forms of life, endless in number, infinite in variety. This question, hardly to be answered by any philosophy, touches us more nearly when limited to the animal creation only. We have already alluded to the controversies now going on as to the origin of species, or more generally of the different types of animal life ; and as to the true nature of that ascending scale in which Man holds the highest place. And connected with these controversies comes in the great problem of animal hfe existing under forms of wonderful variety, and during periods of time vast beyond all esti- mate, before human hfe was blended in the series, and seemingly without any reference to this consumma- tion. The most general expression of the connexion of which we are speaking is that drawn from the law common to all parts of the animal creation ; viz., life maintaining itself upon life — one form of organisa- tion ministering to the existence of another. This is the link that binds together species counted by hundreds of thousands, and individualities of being which no numbers can approach. To this law, by the physical necessities of his nature, Man is equally subjected with MAN AND NATURE. 295 the inferior creatures which surround him. While ruhng in the animal world, he is at the same time de- pendent upon it — not for food and clothing only, for labour and for transport, but in a thousand other ways for the necessities, conveniences, and luxuries of life. It is needless to illustrate by details a matter so famihar, yet seldom perhaps understood to its full extent. Taking singly the objects which are around us in our own homes, we find few that have not been the product of Hving nature before being fashioned to human piu:poses. The original organisation is sometimes preserved, often changed by art ; but still it is the dependence of Man upon organised existence without. Civilised life is mainly contrasted with savage, in the larger and more skilful appropriation of all that the living world offers to our use. This large ministration of other parts of the crea- tion to Man gives us no proof whatever that they were created in sole reference to him. It is impossible to regard the multitudinous forms of hfe — animal and vegetable, fossil or existing — which by no inference can be brought into connexion with the human being, without the conviction that some other great purposes have been intended and fulfilled in this wide and diver- sified creation. We cannot reach, or even approach, these purposes by our reason ; but this inability in no wise impairs the force of the conclusion. Wliether the production of hfe in its various forms and successions has been by operation of more general laws, or by special and repeated acts of creation, equally is there manifest and wonderful design in the whole ; and de- 296 MAN AND NATURE. sign of which Man cannot be the single object, even if he be the final termination of the series. The modes through which Man exercises his power over the animal and vegetable life of the earth we may briefly denote as being either by culture and augmenta- tion, or by extirpation, or by transference of species from one region to another. Many examples of these modes of action will at once be obvious. But there are others not equally familiar, though very important to the well-being of mankind ; and connected with that phe- nomenon of high interest in the economy of the globe, viz., the local apportionment of genera and species, and even of certain types of life, to particular portions of its surface. Without speaking of the many curious and inexplicable cases of limitation of species to a single spot, we may cite a few general facts in illustra- tion, such as that of the Cactaceae being peculiar to the New World, the heaths to the Old ; that no rose has been found in the Southern hemisphere, no oak tree or wild apple in the vast regions of Siberia from the Tobol to the Amour ; that the salmon, existing around the globe in certain latitudes of our hemisphere, is nowhere found in the Southern, &c. This singular distribution of the forms of life (original we may call it, as far as Man's existence is concerned) has furnished problems of equal and similar interest to the zoologist and botanist, with a further appeal to the geologist in seeking for their solution. But long before speculation had been directed to these local diversities or provinces of life on the earth, practical changes \vere already in opera- tion, in the transference from one region to another, MAN AND NATURE. 297 not merely of the products of animal and vegetable growth, but in many cases of tlie animals and plants producing them. "We shall speedily notice some of the more striking examples of this ; saying a few words meanwhile on the other modes in which Man ex- ercises influence on the amount and physical characters of the hving world around him. We have already, indeed, following our author's propositions, spoken of this influence as applied to the forests of different continents and countries ; and need not recur to this topic further than by noting how much has been done, and may yet be done, by multi- plying particular trees and plants, in special soils and for special objects. The forest trees, on the large scale, are left to shift for themselves ; but the mulberry, the olive, the vine, the orange, the cacao, and many others, require and receive more of human culture and selec- tion to aid their increase and ameliorate their produce. The same may be said generally of all fruits and escu- lent vegetables. We find in Gerard's ' Herbal ' (1596) the names of several plants now not seen in our English fields or gardens. Those which remain are multiplied and their varieties selected for culture in proportion to their value ; while of plants that are useless or noxious the extirpation is carried on as far as nature permits it, and most largely in countries well peopled and advanced in civihsation. As with the vegetable so with the animal world. Man can rarely extirpate a species, though natural causes sometimes do so ; and on a vast scale, if we take prior ages and fossil species into account. But he 298 MAN AND NATURE. can often succeed in greatly reducing the number, or removing altogether from a particular region those which are injurious to him. Bears, wolves, and wild boars have all been extirpated in England by direct destruction. The bear ranged our forests in the time of the first Norman kings. The wolf and the wild boar were known in Great Britain at a much later date. The crane, the bustard, the bittern have disappeared from our Eastern counties, but more in effect of advancing cultivation than of any direct agency of Man. Such changes or extirpations are, of course, less frequent in countries thinly peopled and in the rear of civilisation ; yet instances of the kind, and seemingly of recent date, have occurred in New Zealand and other islands of the great Southern Ocean. The tropical forests, jungles, and plains will probably long retain their carnivora and pachydermatous species ; which nevertheless, and despite the uses derived from some of them, are diminishing in number, and will pro- bably in the end disappear under the encroachments of Man, and the more certain and deadly weapons he now employs. Whether species, either animal or vegetable, can ever become extinct by mere lapse of time, and changes producing default in the propagating power, is a deeper question, which cannot be answered upon any knowledge we now possess. The power of Man to augment the amount of ani- mal life in such species as are necessary or convenient to him, is too familiar to need much illustration. There is, of course, a limit which nature in every different country imposes on this power, either by climate, soil. MAN AND NATURE. 299 or other causes affecting the supply of food. But the history of our domestic breeds, and of agriculture as connected with them, shows how far human influence extends in making one part of nature subservient to another, and all minister to Man's wants or pleasures. The effects of selection, guided by reason and expe- rience, in the breeding of animals, are even more striking than as applied to the vegetable kingdom. We here obtain qualities and aptitudes for use, not only far exceeding, but often very different from, those which belong to the primitive stock. The natural in- stincts of animals are moulded into new modes of action ; and in the case of those most largely endowed with intelligence and moral affections (and, however we may define these faculties, who can doubt their presence in the dog, the elephant, the horse, and many other animals ?) human intelligence is still more curiously occupied in bringing them into action and adaptation. We may remark, in passing, on the singular anomaly that the animal nearest akin to the human being in structure and faculties should be amongst those most alien to him in every matter of mutual relation and dependence. Whatever explana- tion we may give of it, we have the fact before us that the anthropoid apes, and the quadrumana generally, are more detached from Man in the conditions of life than many far more remote from him in the scale of being. Eemove them from our menageries and street- organs, and these creatures, the strange mimics of humanity, would scarcely be known to the civilised world save by the narrative of the tropical traveller, 300 MAN AND NATURE. and by the place they occupy in the classification of the zoologist. But this place is so defined as ever to render them objects of deep interest, and of curious though not pleasant speculation to our reason. The most remarkable examples of numerical in- crease in species occur in those new countries to which Man has transported the animals valuable to him for domestic uses. In the vast regions west of the AUeghanies, in the Pampas of South America, and in the new world of Australia, the multiplication of these animals — of the horse, cattle, sheep, and swine — has been on a scale more than commensurate with that of human population. Eevelling in their wide and un- fenced domains, severally more spacious than European kingdoms, and breeding there with unwonted rapidity, some of these animals have even relapsed into the wild state, and become again the prey of the hunter. Everywhere they not merely aid the growth of popu- lation on the spot, but yield large material for export to the very countries from which their own races were derived. And this leads us to speak of that power, which Man has so extensively used, of making one region of the globe minister to another, not solely through the products of animal and vegetable life, but by local ex- change of the animals and plants producing them. This forms an extraordinary chapter in the natural history of the earth, and one that deserves to be more carefully read than it is. We must note, however, in the outset, that this transport and exchange is not due to Man alone, but, in the case of plants more espe- MAN AND NATURE. 301 cially, has been brought about by animals far below him in the scale of being ; wliich, unconsciously and sometimes injuriously to themselves, have carried the seeds and germs of life from one region to another. \Vhat they have done by the mere instincts or acci- dents of existence human intelligence has effected with special interests and larger power. The record of such exchanges would in itself fill a volume. We can notice only a few of the more striking instances. The most remarkable, doubtless, is that which has taken place between the continents of the Old World and those across the Atlantic, which, though peopled before, and by some semi-civilised races, yet came to us as the discovery and conquest of a new world. The balance of exchange here, as might be expected, has been signally in favour of the latter. Even those four articles — cotton, sugar, rice, and coffee — the ex- port of which from America forms so large a part of the commerce of the globe, are all derived from plants originally carried thither by Europeans, and readily propagated, where such diversity and extent of virgin land was offered to their growth. To these more tropical plants must be added the different varieties of cereal grain, hemp, flax, clover, and other herbage, now as thoroughly accHmatised in America as in Europe. We have to set down something, however, to the other side of the account. Of vegetable pro- ducts America has given to the Old World the potato, tobacco, and maize, besides several others of lesser value. Looking singly to that remarkable root, the potato, how great has been its influence, as an article 302 MAN AND NATUEE. of food, in multiplying largely in certain countries tlie amount of human life ! Ireland is now paying back to America, under the form of emigrants, some part of that excess of population due to the exuberant culture of the potato on Irish soil. Tobacco, that strange herb, which, unknown to all former ages, has now be- come so general a luxury or almost necessity to man- kind, may perhaps be deemed a more doubtful benefit. Mr. Marsh, somewhat unexpectedly in an American writer, utters as vehement a counter-blast against it as did our own King James : — I wish I could heHeve with some that America is not alone responsible for the introduction of that filthy weed, tobacco, the use of which is the most vulgar and pernicious habit engrafted by the semi-barbarians of modern civilisation upon the less multifarious sensualism of ancient life. But the alleged occurrence of pipe-like objects in Sclavonic and, it has been said, in Hungarian sepulchres, is hardly sufficient evidence to convict those races of complicity in this grave, offence against the temperance and refinement of modern society. Though it is not our business to argue the matter here, we may remark that this angry invective is justi- fied in relation to excess only. The question is really one of use or abuse, as in regard to every article of ordinary diet, and very especially in relation to wine and other alcoholic liquors. Any allowance granted to a temperate use of these may at least as faij"ly and safely be conceded to tobacco, and even with some specialties in favour of the latter. We have given largely also to America of our vegetables of culinary use. For most of these, indeed, as improved from their original wild state, England is MAN AND NATURE. 303 itself indebted to the European continent. Until the reign of Elizabeth our gardens were very scantily pro- vided, and with varieties far inferior to those we owe to a more select and careful culture. Exchanges of this kind must have gone on in all the old countries from unrecorded times. Europe is indebted to Asia for some of her finest fruits — the orange, the peach, &c. — all ad- vanced in perfection as well as variety when becoming the objects of profitable or luxurious cultivation. In some instances, but not often, we can go back to the wild original stocks upon which Man has grafted by degrees the various perfections of his modern orchards and gardens, as well as the larger cereal products of his fields. Not less remarkable than these exchanges in the vegetable world are those of animal life similarly efiected. Eecurring to America as an example, we find this new continent indebted to the old one for all the mammaha most valuable to mankind — the horse, the cow, the sheep, the ass, the pig, the goat — some of these, as already mentioned, multiplying on their new soil almost beyond human control. As an illus- tration the fact is worthy of notice that at the time of the discovery of America the milk of animals was unknown there as an article of human food. It is no injurious satire upon the European, as the chief emi- grant to the New World, to ask what would have been the present condition of America had these animals not accompanied him thither ? We may fairly assert that a century would hardly have sufficed to represent the actual progress of any ten years of the intervening 304 MAN AND NATURE. time. Some more ambiguous gifts, it is true — as the rat, the mouse, the Hessian fly, &c. — have been carried in man's train, unconsciously to himself; while to repay these inflictions America has recently bestowed upon us a water-weed, which chokes many of our canals and smaller streams by its rapid and irrepressible growth. Though with less present magnitude of results, all we have said of human agency in the peopling of America with new animals and plants is still more strikingly exemplified in the yet newer continent of Australia. This insulated region, before it began under the auspices of England its rapid career towards Southern empire, presented to the naturalist anomalies so strange and perplexing as well to justify the expres- sion of Cuvier, that it seemed like * a portion struck off from some other planet.' With slender affinity even in the types of animal and vegetable life, all particular species, with scarcely an exception, differed from those of the older world, and not a single animal existed there capable of being usefully domesticated. During the seventy-six years which have elapsed since English enterprise first directed itself to Australia, the face of the colonised part of this country has undergone a change marvellous in kind and degree. English trees, fruits, cereals, and grasses, despite the inversion of seasons in the transit, have flourished and propagated abundantly in their new abod« ; while the variety of climate in this great Southern land has allowed the introduction of several tropical plants, promising much to its future prosperity. Mr. Marsh asserts, in one passage of his book, that the wild plant is much hardier MAN AND NATURE. 305 than the domesticated vegetable. This statement, we believe, requires a good deal of qualification. If we are rightly informed, it is contradicted by various facts derived from those Southern colonies of which we are now speaking. The native wild grasses of New Zea- land are said to have been extruded when brought into contact with the artificial grasses imported from Europe ; and analogies may be drawn from the animal kingdom to show that culture and selection are capable of giving increase of vigour, as well as those other quahties to which they are often more especially directed. All the domestic animals we have named as given to America fi:om the Old World, with many others — birds as well as quadrupeds — have been brought into these great colonies ; and the sheep-farming in Aus- tralia is becoming, if not so already, the largest in the world. The silkworm, the salmon, and the sparrow are to be considered, we believe, as the most recent attempted acquisitions to their fauna ; the latter in its valuable capacity as an insectivorous bird. As regards the silkworm, and its needful appendage the mulberry- tree, we consider their successful introduction into Queensland and other colonies to be almost certain. The effort to bring the salmon into the Australian rivers is yet of uncertain result, but the object has been assiduously and skilfully pursued ; and success is well deserved, whether obtained or not. The Accli- matisation Societies of England and France are working actively at this time in promoting these exchanges of animal life over the globe. X 30G MAN AND NATURE. As we have so often had occasion to cite England in illustration of the various subjects of this article, we are tempted to conclude it by some slight sketch of the contrast this island presents in its actual state with its condition as we have it pictured to us at different periods since the Conquest. For a mere out- line the materials must be taken thus generally ; but it would well repay a special labour to fill up the picture as far as possible for particular intervening periods, bringing them severally into this comparison. Sir Francis Palgrave, in the concluding volume of his Norman History, has described the condition of England under the last of her Saxon Kings with some- thing of that ingenuity and power which shine so conspicuously in Lord Macaulay's celebrated chapter on the state of the country in the seventeenth century. At the time of the Conquest, and during the reigns of the early Norman kings, little less than one-third of England was covered with woods, and a still larger part showed a surface only of heath, mountain-moors, marshes, and sea-fens. The small part left for arable uses and pasture sufficed nevertheless for the scanty population of the country, which at that period was probably less than three millions for the whole island. The old English forests are numerously perpetuated by name, even where they no longer exist as such. They were at that time, as we have stated, tenanted by the wild boar, by bears and wolves. The tribute paid to the king in wolves' heads did not prevent the ravages of this animal even near to London, and in remoter parts many centuries later. The beaver then built his MAN A2sD NATURE. 307 habitation in many of our streams, as is testified by local names and other records — a more skilful archi- tect probably than the human builders on their banks. The barren heaths, of which portions are still left, then circled widely around the metropohs, dangerous to the traveller even within a century of our own day. Sea- marshes and fens spread to great length upon the Eastern coast, and far into the interior of the country. A part of the scanty rental of these fenny districts was paid in eels. They abounded in cranes, bitterns, &c., which disappeared but a short time before the present generation. When that freespoken monarch Henry VIII. described Lincolnshire as ' the most brute and beastly shire of all my realm,' he probably pictured fairly enough for his day what is now one of the most prosperous and fertile of our English counties. Even the outline of this Eastern coast was once very different from the present — an estuary of the sea running up to Norwich, and a wide channel separating Thanet from the mainland of Kent. It is difficult to draw any comparison as to cHmate where we possess no instrumental records of tempera- ture, rains, winds, and other atmospheric states. From various incidental notices Sir F. Palgrave has drawn the conclusion that, at the era of the Conquest, it more resembled the chmate of Canada in its extremes of heat and cold. The vineyards of Somersetshire, and the notices of perpetual snow on the summit of the higher hills, afford some evidence to this effect; while the large proportion of forest covering the island gives plausible reason for its being so. X 2 308 MAN AXD NATURE. The outward aspect of all that belongs to social life and habitation was in these early centuries rudely simple. The baronial mansions or castles frowned over the miserable villages or huts which lay around them. The grades in society were then few ; and the passage an abrupt one from the feudal lord to the mere serf of the soil. Yet we must note here one strange anomaly of this period, viz., the earliest erections of those wonderful cathedrals which still excite the admiration, if not the envy, of the architectural science of our own day. There is something of mystery as well as anomaly in this matter, which has not hitherto been adequately explained. History, revelling in its record of battles and sieges, is wellnigh silent as to these better and more lasting triumphs of human power. The country at large was nearly destitute of any other than rude lanes and little less rude highways, on which, but two centuries ago, a four-horse carriage could hardly accomplish in a day the distance which a railway-carriage now sweeps over in a single hour. The provision for travelling on horseback was of better kind ; and we have the records of many extraordinary journeys thus performed ; such as the night's ride of Henry II. from London to Dover, with the incident of an .eclipse of the moon on his way ; the sixty hours' ride of Sir Kobert Carey from London to Edinburgh, to announce to James the death of Elizabeth ; and the still more rapid communication by horse-messengers between Charles I., when at York in 1642, and the Parliament in London. The general state of travelling MAIS' AND NATURE. 309 throughi England at the time of Hs history is excel- lently described by Lord Macaulay ; and to his third chapter we would willingly refer our readers for all that further concerns the physical and social condition of the country at this period, and for a very striking picture of the contrast it presents with the England of our own day. Such contrast is the stronger, of course, when made with those earher times of our history of which we have spoken. We the rather make this reference, as no sufficient space is left to us here to dwell upon the present aspect of England in comparison with the past. In the preceding parts of this article we have, indeed, said much to illustrate it, and to suggest those modes of viewing the subject which may enable our readers to fill up the picture for themselves. It is, in truth, a wonderful picture of human progress — of progress continuous, yet so marvellously quickened during the last fifty years, that the dullest observer of the world around him feels that he is living in a new age ; and the most cautious philosopher scarcely ventures to set a limit to what may hereafter be attained. While the instincts and acts of other animals have remained stationary from the earliest recorded time, human in- telligence, working with, and in part controlhng, the great forces of nature, has covered the globe with monuments of its activity and power. The whole may be received as evidence of the high destiny which God has given to man on the earth — -a destiny mingled at present with much that is obscure to reason and pain- ful to feeling, but capable of and intended, as we 310 MAN AND NATURE. believe, for some higher and nobler development in the time yet to come. Here, then, we bring to a close the summary view of a subject which might worthily occupy a much larger space. While adopting the suggestion of Mr. Marsh's title, we have in no way followed him in the method or details of his work. We think the outhne we have given better fitted to convey to the reader a just idea of the nature and interest of the subject, and to suggest a more scientific and useful manner of pur- suing it. A right method, important in every case, is especially needful where the details are thus endless in number, yet very different in import and value. If in any future edition of his work Mr. Marsh should be led to re-arrange, as well as enlarge, the materials in his hands, it will be satisfactory to us to believe that we may have contributed in part to this good result. 311 LAUGEVS PROBLEMS OF NATURE AND LIFE> [CoNTBIBrTED TO THE ' EdINBUEGH EeVIETV' IN IS?!.] In this Revieio will he found several extracts from the Papers published in the earlier part of this volume. The Editor has thought it best to retain the duplicate passages rather than to recast or omit the essays in question. The volumes we have placed at the head of this article are connected, not solely as works of the same author, but as containing, in their series and several subjects, a general view of the physical science of our time, in the most advanced stages of its progress. The position of M. Laugel as private secretary to the Due d'Aumale — a prince whose learning and many accomplishments, even more than his birth, have given him merited repu- tation in the country of his exile — may be recognised as favourable in various ways to a work of this nature. A Frenchman, and intimate with all that is best in the science and literature of France, his quiet residence at Eichmond and familiarity with English institutions have afforded M. Laugel facihties for portraying modern science in its largest aspects, and under those connexions 1 Science et Philosophic. Par M. Aug. Laugel, ancien ^le?e de I'Ecole Polyteclinique, ex-Ing^nieur des Mines. 12mo. Paris : 1863. Lea ProbUmes de la Nature. Par Auguste Laugel. 12mo. Paris : 1864. Les Prohlhnes de la Vie. Par Auguste Laugel. 12mo. Paris : X867. 312 laugel's problems of nature and life. which now more than ever tend to give it unity as a whole. He is not, we beheve, himself a practical labourer in the field. If this be a disadvantage, there is some compensation for it in the larger and more im- partial scope given to that intelligence which seeks to combine elements of knowledge separate in their ear- lier growth, but now claiming to be blended by higher generalisations. Our author stands fully on a level with the scientific acquirements of his 'time, as well as with those doctrines and speculations which have recently grown out of them. In truth, he everywhere shows himself disposed to adopt the latter in their extremest form. Whether from natural temperament of mind (a powerful agent even in the acceptance of scientific evidence), or from other causes, he boldly confronts, and handles without reserve, all older and more orthodox opinions on the great questions he approaches. The volumes before us, small in size as books, while thus large and bold in scope, are neces- sarily wanting in many of those details and illustrations which novel opinions require for their justification. This gives an aspect of dogmatism to M. Laugel's writings ; not," indeed, without some reality, from the evident bias of mind to which we have just alluded. He often expresses as established truths things which are still matter of doubt and controversy. Apart from this comment, we can give unequivocal praise to the style of these volumes. M. Laugel has an epigrammatic felicity of expression frequent in French writers even on the most abstruse topics. He is occa- sionally somewhat too florid in phrase, but there is no LAUGEL'S PROBLEJilS OF NATURE AND LIFE. 313 scientific pedantry about him. He comes at once to his subject without parade of preface, and puts what he has to say fairly in front. Whatever be thought of his doctrines, they are at least honestly and clearly pro- nounced. If expressed sometimes too dogmatically, you see that they are really liis opinions, and reached by study and earnest thought on the several subjects before him. In our review of these volumes we do not think it necessary to follow M. Laugel's course through all the topics with which he deals, but shall rather seek to select such as may best illustrate those methods and at- tainments of physical science which so strikingly cha- racterise the age in which we are living. A summary view of the progress and state of this vast department of human knowledge we gave in an article some twelve years ago. Since that time the steps in advance have been not less gigantic than those we then described ; rendering the present century, still not near its end, the most remarkable in the history of mankind. Happy would it be could we record commensurate change and progress in the moral conditions of human existence, of men and of nations of men ! Such golden age is yet a Utopian dream of the future. The narrative of the year just expired tells nothing of it ; save in the solitary hope that the horrors of warfare, thus aug- mented by the new weapons which science has fur- nished, may check at least, if not annul, the repetition of such calamities to the civilised world. The first and second of M. Laugel's volumes. 314 laugel's problems of nature and life. entitled ' Science et Philosophie * and ' Problemes de la Nature,' discuss, in the spirit and style we have just denoted, the general principles, aims, and methods of modern science. His mind readily embarks in those bolder enterprises of speculation which formerly could only be deemed the vagaries of thought, but have now been sanctioned by deeper research into the mj^sterious laws of nature — more wonderful in their reality than any imaginations of untutored genius or of the wildest fancy. With the new licence, however, thus obtained, there is still need of much control over this modern spirit of philosophy. Hypothesis— in many cases an admirable minister to the discovery of truth — is often stretched too far, and into regions inaccessible to human research. The interlopers and dabblers in science — those who, to take Lord Bacon's words, ' will not wait the harvest, but attempt to mow the moss and reap the green corn ' — are most at fault here ; but these are many and active in their generation. The phraseology of true science is easily caught up and easily misapplied ; and the genuine coin becomes dis- credited by the base. This evil partially remedies itself through the wonted incongruity of all such naked hypotheses. In physics nothing that is unproved can ever find permanent place. On this general topic, however, we must carry our remarks a step farther. That truth is the sole legiti- mate object of human enquiry is easily and familiarly said ; but in seeking for truth it is useful, and even needful, to recognise in the outset that there are things which man troweth not — things which, though realities LAUGELS PROBLEMS OF NATURE AND LIFE. 315 ill themselves, cannot be compassed by thouglit, and lie, therefore, beyond the scope of human research. In every enquiry we are bound to regard primarily what has been done, and what yet remains to be done. But also it is well to know and ever hold in mind the existence of these unknowable realities — a caution hap- pily expressed by Malebranche, the most eminent disciple of Descartes : ' II est bon de comprendre clairement qu'il y a des choses qui sont absolument incomprehensibles.' It is into their unfathomable depths that the metaphysical mind loves to dive ; bringing back little more than a new coinage of words and phrases, more fitted to entangle and delude the understanding than to enlighten it. Speculations and reveries of this kind, indeed, are most prone to grow up where science has not yet begun to work by expe- rimental research. The ancient philosophers, Greek and Eoman, entertained them as a sort of intellectual luxury ; those of mediaeval time as a cloister occupa- tion and refuge from the barbarism surrounding them. Even the most savage races of men chng to such ques- tions, in rude expression of their wonder at those mys- terious changes and convulsions of the material world to which they, in common with the philosopher, are unceasingly subjected. We dwell the rather upon this point because the physical science of our day is marked especially by its close approach to these insoluble questions. Modern discovery, whether dealing with the infinitely great or the infinitesimally small, whether with stars or atoms, has been emboldened by its own success, and presents 316 laugel's problems of natuee and life. problems to us for future solution which Swift would have related as the reveries of Laputan philosophy. The Cavendishes and WoUastons of a prior generation, who shrunk back with a certain distrust and alarm even from their own discoveries, are now nowhere to be found. It may be admitted that many of what once appeared insuperable barriers have been removed, and that it is frequently as rash in science to impose limits as to seek to penetrate beyond them. Yet the few single words, Space, Time, Matter, Force, Motion, • and Life, bring us into direct contact with problems which, though based on innumerable phenomena, forming the totality of our physical knowledge, leave reason utterly at fault. Take, for instance, the old question regarding that very Matter itself, which we are now so boldly handling, through the properties of its ultimate atoms and molecules. Is it actually created by the same Supreme Power which formed it into worlds and living existences ? Or is it in itself eternal — the primitive material with which the Creator has thus wonderfully worked in evoking all that we see in the universe around us ? It is obvious that reason is vainly spent in seeking to encounter a ques- tion where, though one of the alternatives must neces- sarily he true, no proof or argument can possibly be brought to determine which is so. The same with regard to the Infinite, whether of space, time, or number. The mathematician may give technical expression to it, in certain forms to which his science conducts liim, and the metaphysician may revel in the very vagueness of the conceptions it laugel's problems of nature and life. 317 conveys ; but it is a word unreal to all thought, and philosophy is bound to be sparing in the use of it. It might be well, too, were theology, in dealing with these terms of Infinity and Eternity, more thoughtful and forbearing on the doctrines and denunciations to which it applies them. Eternity has been well de- scribed as ' a negative idea clothed with a positive name.' Conceptions so vast are, in fact, only described by negative terms — the endless, the incomprehensible. "We are all more or less enslaved by words ; but it is the proper business, equally of religion and philosophy, to throw off this thraldom, when truth, as often hap- pens, is fettered or distorted by it. We have just named Matter, Force, Motion, and Life, as terms which in their most general sense give foundation to all science, and at the same time express its most profound and perplexing problems. The word Force especially, known to us through its relation to matter and motion in space, taxes the thought by a sort of harsh compulsion of use. It is a term too variously famihar in common life to be thus largely appropriated by science. No present definition has rescued it, in this higher sense, from a certain meta- physical obscurity of meaning. We know force as a reality only by what we term its effects ; and we pluralise the word in speaking of the several forces manifested in the phenomena of the natural world — while at the same time finding, in these very pheno- mena, a correlation, by interchanges of material effects, so exactly equivalent that nothing which we can term force or power is lost in the translation. In this 318 laugel's problems of nature and life. latter fact — one of the greatest discoveries of modern science — we gain a certain unity for the problem, in the conception of a single Power which, indestructible in itself, acts in different modes and degrees throughout the material universe — the source of all motion and change in the greatest and in the most minute pheno- mena of nature. But this at best is a cloudy concep- tion, insusceptible of any direct proof, and incapable of being moulded into a definition. The abstract idea looms before us, but escapes before we can grasp it. Nor can we shelter our ignorance under any of the various terms used by philosophers to designate this power — SwdfJieLSj eVepyeta, vis viva, vis mortua, dynamic energy, potential energy, ' lebendige Krafte,' or whatever else the diversities or impotence of lan- guage have suggested. These phrases, even were they congruous, do little more than repeat the pro- blem in new words. We are still dealing with what is unperceived by any of our senses — itself, for aught we can tell, immaterial — and known only as the cause of sensible changes in the matter around lis. Nor do we gain much here by seeking, as some have done, to conceive of force as a mere expression of the intestine changes which matter itself, in its atomical parts, is ever undergoing, and which are in perpetual translation and interchange from one material form to another. This is shifting the difficulty without solving it. Whence come these motions and innumerable in- terchanges in matter ? What is the power initiating and propagating them ? To say that it is one inherent in matter itself thickens rather than dispels the dark- laugel's problems op nature and life. 319 ness. M. Laugel enters into these questions, and we give the following passage as a good example of his style : — ' La force est ce qu'il y a de plus mysterieux dans la nature. EUe est dans la substance et n'est pas la substance ; ou plutot la substance etant perpetuellement active et passive, en tant que passive elle subit Faction de la force, en tant qu'active elle devient force a son tour. Car il ne faut point imaginer la force comme quelque chose d'exterieur a la matiere ordinaire, comme une entite d'une espece particuliere qui se melerait aux corps, y entrerait, en sortirait, au gre des circonstances. Avant qu'on eut bien compris le caractere do I'universalite de la force^ telle etait I'idee qu'on se faisait des forces particulieres. On parlait du fluide electrique, du calorique, de la gravite, comme d'essences reelles, sur-ajoutees en quelque sorte a la matiere. Le langage de la physique n'est pas encore debarrasse de ces locutions vicieuses.' M. Laugel here and elsewhere shows the intrinsic difficulties of the subject, but provides no new or feasible way out of them. The science of our day has instructed us largely, though yet imperfectly, in the atomic and molecular properties of matter ; and in those multiform changes by addition, subtraction, and substitution on which chemistry, as a special branch of knowledge, is founded. But it tells nothing of that secret motive cause on which these changes depend, and by which they are translated from one portion of matter to another, under exact equivalents of power and effect. It is not surprising that this problem of force, as grand as obscure, presenting itself in naked form even to the rudest intelligence, should have been seized upon with avidity in all ages. Some of the questions 320 laugel's problems of nature and life. just denoted struck the ancient philosophers as they do us, and were answered with even greater audacity, from the absence of those checks which inductive science imposes. The terms to ndcrxov and to ttolovu briefly express the relation of matter and force in the Greek philosophy. Cicero and Seneca both denote the points in question clearly and compendiously. The science of our own time, though it illustrates these relations in a thousand ways unknown before — though it may be said to have added a new element of power to those already known, and by gigantic efforts of human genius to have converted all to the practical uses of man — yet, as regards the internal nature of matter and force severally, has scarcely carried our knowledge beyond that of our predecessors. Motion and change show us the results of their rela- tion, and with these science has its dealings, leaving still open the cardinal question. What is Matter? What is Force ? Some philosophers, as we have seen, standing on the brink of these profound problems, merge all matter in centres and lines of force ; others see force only in the conditions and changes of matter itself. We have half-a-dozen books and papers lying before us in which this question is handled, under various conceptions of the points in dispute. And many others are announced as about to appear. In the recent multiplicity of these writings on force, as an element in the natural world, we find justification for thus discussing the subject. The am- biguities besetting the term in its various relations have been rather multiplied than lessened by conflict- laugel's problems of nature and life. 321 ing championship. Even in the case of heat as a force this comment has its appHcation. This great power, so essential to life and all existence on earth, is now deemed to be a mode of motion of matter itself ; and its variations to depend on interchanges of such atomic motions, tending to equalise their degree, or cause their conversion into mechanical or other kinds of force. The main fountain of heat to us, as well as of light, is the sun. This great body projects, through the ether of intervening space, waves or impulses so variously and Avonderfully propertied as to produce, on reaching the earth, those several effects of light, heat, and chemical action of which the solar spectrum is the simple but sublime interpreter. To the sun, then, we must look for that astonishing initial force, whatever it be, which from age to age combines and emits those complex undulations of which heat and light are the exponents to us on earth, while they alike pervade every part of the solar system. We may admit that heat, as expressed by temperature in the grosser forms of matter, is simply due to intestine movements of their particles ; but we cannot exclude the sun as the present primary source of that power which these motions distribute and equalise. The discoveries of Tyndall show by what subtle molecular adjustments the heat thus received is prevented from freely radia- ting back into space. The question whether the sun loses by this unceasing emission of power — for we are not authorised to call it substance — and how this loss, if real, is repaired, have been subjected to various recent hypotheses, but without any certain or even Y 322 LAUGELS PROBLEMS OP NATURE AND LIFE. plausible conclusion. If, indeed, the notion of neces- sary repair be admitted, we are called upon to provide for more than two million times the amount which the sun transmits to the earth, such being the relative pro- portion of this power lost — ^if lost — by projection into circumambient space. Latent heat, again — or what we are called upon to regard as synonymous, latent force or potential energy — is among the conceptions which modern science has embodied in its doctrines ; a difficult conception, indeed, but based on the apparent phenomena of bodies pass- ing successively through the solid, fluid, and gaseous states. Even if Dr. Andrews' recent discoveries did not throw doubt on the interpretation of these phe- nomena, we should still have to ask, Wliat is this latent force of heat? The name implies an existing reality. In what does this reality consist? Theory can only answer, in some interior specific condition or arrange- ment of atoms, lasting until excited to fresh change. But see how much obscurity hangs over all this, when closely analysed! How much obscurity, too, in tliat general conception of potential force or energy stored up in matter, which furnishes so many startling illustra- tions to the scientific teaching of the day. It is deemed possible to say that Heat and Light, as forces or active powers, absorbed originally from the sun by vegetable life on the earth, and following the conversion of the latter into coal, have thus lain dormant for untold ages in a mineral form, to be finally extricated in the fires and furnaces of our own time. We cannot disprove this, or bring other hypotheses to meet the facts. But laugel's problems of natuhe and life. 323 when we speak of heat as a force, consisting integrally in certain atomic motions of bodies, which force may- be pent up for ages in these atomic recesses, yet ever ready for extrication, we are bound to look fairly at the abstract conceptions these things involve, if indeed they can be truly understood in any other way than as simply expressing phenomena. The word Force, with all the adjuncts imposed upon it, still looms before us, as a mysterious symbol, rather than an intelhgible reality. We have been led to dwell long on this subject from feeling that the conception of Force — the very back- bone, we may call it, of physical science — ^has been grievously disjointed by the various and vague use made of the term. Whether any word or phrase could be devised giving more unity to the idea, and to the phe- nomena it embodies, may be doubtful. We do not ourselves venture to suggest one. The radical difficulty lies in the mysteries of nature itself, which we have not sufficiently penetrated to draw this unity from their depths. Such difficulty becomes more manifest as we pursue the subject into other of its ramifications. If we do so here, it is less for the purpose of exposing the deficiencies of our knowledge than to show what science has done, or is yet seeking to do, in the several cases where Force is brought in as the exponent of pheno- mena. W^e pass over mechanical forces, though to these also some of the foregoing remarks will apply. Coming to gravitation, we are on smoother ground as regards the sequence of facts and the phraseology expressing Y 2 324 laugel's problems of nature and life. them, though still ignorant of the intimate nature of this great power of the universe. Unlike other forces in the sublime simplicity of its laws, this very simplicity becomes a bar to research. The legacy of ignorance which Newton left behind him, declaring, with the wonted candour of genius, that he did so, has de- scended to his successors in the enquiry, who must, in their turn, bequeath it to posterity. Several mathema- ticians and experimentalists of our own time — Faraday among the latter — have adventured on the research, with the especial object of bringing Gravity into some direct relation with the other forms of force, but hitherto in vain. And we are compelled still to abide in the simple view of Gravity as a force incorporate in matter itself throughout the universe, and under every shape which matter can assume, in our own or other worlds. This itself is a grand conception ; but it is a sohtary and shapeless grandeur, which we might well desire to exchange for more substantial knowledge. But while speaking of Gravity, can we rightly ex- clude from the name or conception of Force those re- pulsions which we recognise in the material world ; most obviously in atomic actions and changes, and in electric and magnetic phenomena ; but also, as we have some reason to suppose, in cosmical changes beyond the limits of our globe ? Boscovich admitted such re- pulsions as a part of his theory of forces, and some modern physicists (we pray for a happier word denoting them) have adopted the same view. But it is a point less regarded generally than it ought to be by those who think or write on this subject. Other modes of laugel's problems op nature and life. 325 action, again, we designate by the one short word the use or abuse of which we are now considering. Centri- fugal force, though recognised only as an antagonism, yet has a special reality as such. The force of cohesion, denoting perhaps only one mode of action of a larger • power, must nevertheless be admitted into use as the exponent of very important natural phenomena, which we cannot otherwise illustrate than by this or other equivalent terms. To treat fully, indeed, of all that may be attributed to the atomic and molecular forces of matter would be to fill a volume with facts, theories, and conjectures. The phenomena of crystallisation alone, seen under the microscope, and duly appreciated in all their bearings, bring before us a marvellous ex- emplification of these occult forces and actions in the atomic world. There yet remain certain powers in the world of creation which, whatever their affinities to those already named, require to be regarded apart, viz., the Vital Forces, and the Force of Yohtion. In the first of these terms we indicate that mysterious agency which gives form, function, and hereditary succession to all living organisations of the earth, afibrding to science problems, of supreme interest and supreme difficulty. The notion of a vital principle has been rejected by many physio- logists as unproved and needless. But here, again, it is the old conflict of words. That there is some power or force, call it what we will, working upon matter as its subject or instrument in the creation and maintenance of the various forms of life, and that this power, how- ever connected, has its pwn special character, cannot be 326 l^ugel's problems of k\ture and life. denied without casting off at once all that our senses as well as reason teach us. The simple fact of the trans- mission of hereditary likeness through successive gene- rations is in itself a volume of argument on the subject. To say that a nisus^ or force or forces, inherent in matter itself, can create a series of living beings of defi- nite forms and most complex functions, is either a naked assertion without proof or a virtual admission of vital force under another form of words. The generation of life from life is, and probably ever will be, one of the insoluble mysteries of philosophy. If asked what this vital force is, we may answer by the coimter-questions — What is gravitation ? What that force which puts the ether of space into those marvellous motions which we receive as light and heat ? These problems are all of the same kind, involving questions with which no present reasoning or conception can cope. We come, lastly, to a power closely associated with those by which life is engendered, viz., the Force of Volition, of the Will, an entity not less real in its action on matter than any of those other unseen powers with which we have been dealing. If, indeed, we phrase the whole question as involving the origin of force, there is none so direct and explicit in the relation of antecedents and effects. And there is none of which we have so clear a knowledge through the conscious- ness of our own powers. Man feels that he has a will ; he knows that his physical and moral forces are go- verned by it ; and he concludes that the operation of forces not directed by an intelligent will would lead to the return of chaos. We will a certain bodily action. LAUGEL*S PROBLEMS OF NATURE AND LIFE. 327 and the action instantly follows, as mechanical in its effects as the fall of a heavy body or the stroke of the steam-hammer. Whatever definition of force be adopted, this comes integrally under it, though the question as to its nature and origin be still wholly unresolved.^ If we have pursued this subject of Force to the weariness of our readers, we must seek excuse from the large part these questions are made to play in the science as well as speculation of our time, and from the frequent confusion introduced by the vague or in- congruous use of the word itself. We do not profess- to have done more than simply indicate what is yet wanting to our consistent compreliension of the idea. Human reason is perhaps incompetent to grasp in its entirety this great problem of force ; but a patient re- search into, and strict analysis of, phenomena may give us nearer approach to that unity of power which we have cause to consider the ultimate truth. There is little chance of entering per saltum into these secret places of nature. And the fine saying of Pascal may profitably be remembered : ' L'univers nous ecrase. C'est le privilege de I'homme de savoir qu'il est ecrase.' From the forces moving matter to the matter moved — a step downwards, it might seem, but which is in effect a descent from the clouds to the terra frma- of ^ An admirable paper by Sir J. Herschel, on the * Origin of Force,' may most profitably be studied in reference to this point, as to all others connected with the general problem. 328 LAUGEL'S PEOBLEMS OF NATUEE AND LIFE. physical science. We might, indeed, plunge into mys- teries here also, if seeking for a definition of Matter in the abstract, and that relation of its existence to the percipient mind which has been the metaphysical wrangle of ages. When Mr. Mill somewhere defines it as the ' permanent possibility of sensation,' we see, though dimly, what he means, but gain nothing by the definition. Fortunately, experimental science is seldom led far astray by the vague phrases of philosophy. It regards matter in a real sense, as made up of parts or atoms of inconceivable minuteness and mobi- lity — each atom, whatever its elementary nature, having its individual properties and relations to others, whether similar or dissimilar in kind — which properties and re- lations, brought into action by what we call forces, from within or without, give origin to all the motions, changes, and endless combinations and forms, living and lifeless, which we see around us. In saying this, we are denoting what is the true foundation of Che- mistry — that great science which, while embracing some of the most important objects of human research, practical as well as purely scientific, is now so closely blended by correlation with other sciences that all limit is lost, even to a definition. The phenomena of elec- tricity — those of light and heat in their innumerable aspects — animal and vegetable physiology — even astro- nomy and the mechanical sciences, and, yet more, all the practical arts, are thus interwoven with chemistry — a union continually advancing with the advance of knowledge ; as must of necessity be the case in a science based on the elementary parts and rnotions of laugel's problems of nature and life. o'Ad matter, and thus related to the forces on which these motions depend. The word Chemistry, feeble and partial as originally applied, now appropriates to itself a vast space in the domain of human knowledge. We have stated our design of briefly illustrating in this article some of the more marked characteristics and attainments of recent science. Before dilating on that branch of it which thus deals with matter through its infinitesimal parts, we might invite the notice of our readers to that loftier study which has for its pro- vince the heavens and their numberless worlds. The progress of astronomy during the last few years has not been less rapid than that of the other sciences, with some of which it has become united by new and unexpected relations. To the most remarkable of these we shall have occasion immediately to refer, though with another object. But the discoveries due to spectrum analysis, the greatest astronomical achieve- ments of our time, have been so fully described in a late number of this Eeview, that we may best avoid repe- tition by hastening to another subject, though loth to quit one replete with grandeur in itself, and exemplify- ing so wonderfully the genius and intellectual prowess of man in his higher grades of cultivation. We revert, then, to Chemistry, the objects of which as a science and its rapid and various progress we have just denoted. Our further notice, however, must be limited to a few only of the attainments of recent years. A large proportion of these may be said to belong to, or to come in illustration of, the atomic theory, of which the two great processes of analysis and synthesis, 330 laugel's troblems of nature and life. in their most general sense, are at once the exponents and instruments. To this atomic theory we shall have occasion to allude again. Meanwhile we must treat of it here as practically the foundation of modern che- mistry, of its researches, doctrines, and nomenclature. In its origin a rude and unformed bequest of ancient philosophy, it is now fashioned and perfected into a system to which the attributes of number, weight, and proportion give a character of proof next to mathe- matical in kind. The power of predicting results, and obtaining them after prediction, is the high prerogative of the chemist of our day. He may feel justly proud of those tables which, in the synthetical exactness of their series, even when most complex, express at once the certainty of the facts and the subtlety of the pro- cesses by which they were obtained. The gaps in these series have been gradually filled up, in accord- ance with the laws of numerical proportion, which determine the relations of atoms in their simplest form. The secondary relations of comi)ound atoms, or mole- cules^ as they are distinctively called, show the same fixity of combination according to atomic weights ; even the most complex union of compound bodies ever taking place in multiples of the combining proportions. The curious facts regarding chemical equivalents, or the substitution of one elementary body for another in a given compound, all attest the same law of definite proportions ; which, even apart from experiment, might be presumed a necessary consequence and corollary to the atomic theory. Securely aided by this theory, the chemist penetrates deeply into the intimate constitu- LAUGELS PROBLEMS OF MATURE AND LIFE. 331 tioii of matter ; and bringing this knowledge into prac- tice, is able, by chemical processes, to extricate the most brilliant dyes from common coal-tar ; and to derive from the nauseous dregs of distillation various compounds gifted with fruit odours fragrant enough to serve for the most dehcate confectionery. These topics, however, involve too many details to allow of our following them farther. But having named analysis and synthesis, the terms which summarily denote the processes nature employs, or man devises, to bring about the changes in question, we will briefly advert to the new channels, as they may fitly be called, which have recently been opened out to analytic chemistry. A new method of research may well take rank among the highest discoveries, when, as often happens, it is the prolific parent of them. The first of these methods is that of the Spectrum Analysis, already abounding, as many of our readers are aware, in wonderful results, though but a dozen years ago the bare suggestion of a few men of genius who looked forward in advance of their time. The discoveries due to it are cosmical in the largest sense. They directly associate chemistry with astronomy, and give us a new knowledge of the sun and fixed stars which it might well seem beyond human compass to attain ; but, being attained, becomes the best augury of what may hereafter be reached by similar research. Descending from celestial to earthly analysis, we may affirm it as probable that the four new metals — cassium, rubidium, thalhum, and iridium — would iiever have be- come known to man but for those delicate spectrum 332 laugel's problems of nature axd life. lines, betokening in each case the presence of some element hitherto unseen by human eye. Nor without this aid should we have learnt that lithium, before deemed one of the rarest of metals, is diffused more universally than almost any other in the organic as well as inorganic matter of our globe ; attesting by this diffusion, however infinitesimally minute the quan- tities concerned, some hidden use in the economy of nature. From this method again we obtain further evidence, were such necessary, of the inconceivable minuteness of those atoms and molecules of matter which have hitherto been subjected to the grosser processes of chemical analysis. The detection, by its yellow spec- trum-line, of less than a milhonth part of a grain of sodium in the air, is a striking instance in point ; and many equivalent examples might be given. In truth, this very minuteness of the ultimate parts — the crcu/Aara dSiatpero — of matter, as well as their exquisite mobihty, if not indeed their unceasing motion^ are necessary to any conception we can form of the phenomena of the material world. We must not here go aside to plunge into the depths of the atomic theory, otherwise we might add to these postulates that of determinate figure — a necessity, as we must regard it, of the functions they perform — the only key to the phenomena of definite proportions, isomorphism, allotropy, and other facts and doctrines embodied in chemical science. Adaptations, perfect and constant such as these phenomena present, can hardly co-exist but with forms equally perfect and permanent. But admitting this, what system of atomic laugel's problems op nature and life. 333 morphology can be constructed to meet all the condi- tions of the problem ? Nearly seventy kinds of matter are still elementary to our knowledge. Are we to sup- pose different figures of the component atoms of each of these ? Or in sight of this difficulty, may we pre- sume that many of them are really compounds of simpler elements, though beyond the reach of discovery as such ? or allotropic conditions of the same element, as Dumas conjectures regarding chlorine, iodine, and bromine.^ Questions still more intricate offer them- selves when we come to the molecular compounds of atoms. Here we are almost compelled, on physical conditions, to suppose a variety of configurations as great as the diversity of properties which these mole- cules exhibit, and which are in no way more curiously exhibited than in their various action on the animal economy. A slight difference in the proportions even of the same ingredients in a compound makes the dif- ference between a food and a poison. Professor Tyn- dall's experiments on the transmission of radiant heat through gases have already furnished conclusions of great interest to our knowledge of molecular physics. We would willingly look to his labours and genius for further exploration in this field of research. In close connexion w^ith these questions we must refer to another new method of analysis — the growth, it may be said, of our own time. We allude to the ad- mirable researches of the late Master of the Mint, whose death (following soon after that of a still more illustrious philosopher) we have much cause to deplore. Professor Graham, in devoting his long labours to tlie 334 laugel's problexMs of nature and life. illustration of tlie phenomena of the effusion and diffu- sion of gases through each other, and through interven- ing septa of different substances, has done more than any other experimentalist in materialising atoms and molecules to our comprehension ; by showing their dis- tinctive and relative modes of action, their separation even from what we call chemical combination by other than chemical reactions, and their different capacity and rate of penetration through the porous media used to effect this separation. When we are told that the pores of graphite (one substance employed as a septum) are so minute that a gas cannot pass through in mass, but in molecules only, we obtain a certain relative comprehension of atomic elements, and an index to collateral enquiry in this very interesting branch of physics. Such enquiry cannot fail to be pursued fur- ther. In his paper on the molecular mobility of gases Mr. Graham enlarges upon and justifies the belief that continual intestine movement of atoms or molecules is an essential condition of matter in a gaseous state, these movements being different in different gases. This inference, indeed, is almost inevitable from the experiments he has recorded, and serves to interpret other known phenomena, which scarcely admit of being otherwise explained. Let us here notice in passing that Lucretius, that wonderful poet and the predictor of much that has been proved and amplified by later research, fore- shadows in some sort the recent discoveries of Graham and others on the diffusibility and penetrability of different kinds of matter (lib. ii. 288, et seq.). His laugel's problems of nature and life. 335 great poem deserves to be read in its relation to more than one of the doctrines of our own day.^ We might almost mention among new modes of analysis, were it not that the products evade examina- tion, those beautiful experiments of Tyndall in whicli he decomposes highly attenuated vaporous compounds by the solar or electric beam, passed through the tubes containing them. The delicate aerial clouds gradually developed in these tubes, while they illustrate the exquisite atomic tenuity of matter, suggest analogies or explanations of other physical phenomena occurring in our atmosphere, as well as remotely in the universe around us. Before quitting the atomic theory we must brieiiy notice the remarkable conclusions drawn from the theory of gases by Sir W. Thomson and Clarke Max- well, as to the minuteness of the molecules composing them — a minuteness of which a hundred-millionth part of a centimetre is but an approximate expression. More recently, again, Sir W. Thomson has denoted what he considers evidence of fixed physical limits to the smallness of atoms and molecules — one very in- geniously derived from the contact electricity of metals — others drawn from the theories of capillary attraction, and from that of gaseous actions ; severally affording 1 Speaking thus of Lucretius, we are tempted to transcribe a few lines we have not seen quoted in reference to the topic, now so much dis- cussed, of the early condition of man, and the order in which he succes- sively fashioned weapons and implements to his use : — ^ Arma antiqua, manus, ungues, dentesque fuerunt; Et Lapides, et item sylvarum fragmina rami. Posterius Ferri vis est, ^Erisque reperta. Seel prior JEris erat quarn Ferri cognitus usus.^ 336 laugel's problems of nature and lib^e. proof that such limits do really exist. These conclu- sions, though we can in no way contravene them in theory, and though they express what may perhaps be called necessary -physical conditions, yet are hardly determinate enough to be recorded as scientific truths. The huge array of figures which modern science so often forces upon us in describing each extremity of the scale of magnitudes in nature — whether of matter, or space or motion — often creates distrust in men, even the most intelligent, not accustomed to physical evi- dence. The concurrent and co-ordinate nature of this evidence, and the power it so frequently gives of predicting results, furnish all needful reply to scepticism of this Idnd. That it should exist can hardly create surprise. A word more we must say of the late Master of the Mint, in reference to the most recent of his researches — that which justified him, as he considered, in placing hydrogen, under the name of Hydrogenium, among the metallic bodies. We have little doubt that he was right in ratifying a suspicion which had before been broached to this effect. The singular resemblance to metalhc alloys of the compounds of hydrogen with certain metals, scarcely admits of other conclusion than that this gas, the lightest of all known matter, is itself really the vapour of a very volatile metal I The most striking testimony is that derived from the absorption of hydrogen by palladium — amounting in some cases to nearly 1,000 times the volume of the latter metal — and producing a compound strongly characterised in its properties, as shown both in the results of charging with LAUGEL's problems of nature and LtPE. 337 hydrogen, and in those which attend and follow its exclusion from the alloy. This discovery, if we may so deem it, has much value, not solely in itself, but also in the collateral suggestions it affords. Familiar as we seem to be with oxygen, there are still certain anomalies regarding this greatest element of the natural world which are awaiting further solution. Such are its allotropic states, and the true theory of ozone. The same may even more especially be said of that other great element, nitrogen, so wonderfully associated with oxygen in the atmosphere of our globe — not chemi- cally, we are told, and yet everywhere, and always present in such exact proportion that it is difficult not to suppose some atomic relation beyond that of mere admixture. But taking nitrogen singly, as an element to our present knowledge, we know few chemical ob- jects better fitted to stimulate and reward research. Considered in its simplest state as a gas, it is chiefly defined by negative qualities ; while in its compounds it furnishes some of the most violent agents, explosive and poisonous, which nature or art has produced. These explosive actions are explained by the phrase of instability of combination applied to them ; but no explanation has yet reached those by which living organisms are affected. The natural relations, indeed, of this element to animal life, both in its structure and functions, are matter of high interest. Nor must we omit those recent discoveries which give to nitrogen a cosmical existence in planetary space, together with hydrogen and the several metals which have yielded z 338 laugel's problems of nature and life. their lines to the spectrum. Its relations to hydrogen in the form of ammonia are among the most important in the economy of nature ; while the strange alloy produced by the union of ammonia and mercury affords suggestions which may fitly become the basis of future research. Under the same view we would notice the singular and exceptional relations of nitro- gen to titanium and boron — all these things concur- ring to furnish motives as well as means for further enquiry. In dwelling thus long on these parts of chemistry we have little space left to speak of the synthetical branch of the science ; though this too has been greatly advanced of late years by the labours of chemists both at home and abroad. The most inte- resting discoveries here are those w^hich bring the chemistry of organic life into connexion with that of the inorganic world. By processes successful in their subtlety various products have come out from the laboratory identical with those which were before considered exclusively due to the functions of animal or vegetable life. In regarding, however, these and other kindred achievements, we must not view analysis and synthesis as oppugnant or detached methods of research. The processes by which atoms and mole- cules are rent asunder from their compounds have close relation to those by which they are restored to the same, or to other combinations, often new and un- foreseen. They mutually aid and abet each other, illustrating in this that great law of continuity which prevails throughout all nature. laugel's problems of nature and life. 339 In mentioning this law — first distinctly stated by Leibnitz, but verified and largely amplified since — we may again briefly advert to the recent experiments of Dr. Andrews, annulling the old view that the solid, liquid, and gaseous forms are severally assumed per saltum, and proving a continuous and gradual change from one of these states to another, subject to condi- tions of heat and pressure. These researches we re- gard as highly important ; not solely in relation to the theory of gaseous bodies, but also to the doctrines of heat, and generally to all phenomena in which atomic actions are concerned. We cannot close this short sketch of the state of chemical science without "adverting to one great hiatus (valde defiendus^ we may add) in this great depart- ment of knowledge ; the want, namely, of some single system of chemistry, which, basing its classification and nomenclature on philosophical theory, may give true relation and congruity to facts now become ap- palling from their multitude and various interpretation. We have before us at this moment four several volumes, the works of chemists of high and merited eminence, each adopting and carrying into details its own special principles of arrangement and nomenclature. In some cases these differences involve cardinal points of chemi- cal theory. In all cases they are embarrassing to the student ; and very especially so in organic chemistry, the newest and most arduous department of the science. StiU, we can hardly feel surprise at the deficiency we state, seeing the enormous complexities of the subject; augmenting rather than diminishing • with the disco- z 2 340 LAUGEL'S PROBLEMS OF NATURE AND LIFE. veries successively made and the new objects and methods disclosed. The various problems left only partially solved regarding atoms and molecules — ^their figure, magnitude, motion, relative weights and affini- ties — may well explain the difficulty of obtaining one single system, sufficient and permanent. Take the example of what are called ' compound radicals ' — par- ticular compounds having fixity enough to act as bases in other combinations. This conception is forced upon us by facts ; but these facts admit of being differently- construed, and actually are so by different chemists. With all this, we cannot doubt that science, advancing in every direction, will eventually construct some chemical system more simple and complete than any we now possess, though still not reaching that prin- ciple of unity and power towards which, as a basis, the aspirations of all scientific men are directed. From Chemistry we come, by the correlation of numerous phenomena, to Electricity — that wonderful element — scarcely three centuries ago recognised only in the flashes of the thunderstorm, or in the trivial attractive power of amber and a few other bodies — now known to us as one of the great powers of the universe; penetrating and pervading all matter, and present under one form or other in every act of phy- sical change. In no department of science has the research of the present century been more active and successful. The advance of later years, indeed, has consisted not so much in the discovery of new elemen- tary laws, as in the application of those already known. LAUGELS PROBLEMS OF NATURE AND LIFE. 341 Kew modes of evolution, and augmentation of power through induction and the conversion of mechanical into electrical force, furnish notable instances of such progress. And yet more those inventions, admirable alike for their genius and boldness, by which the Elec- tric Telegraph has been spread over the globe, and subjected to man's control even in the uttermost depths of its ocean channel. The relations of Electricity to Magnetism, though the identity of the element of power is proved, have received httle further develop- ment ; and many obscure questions are here awaiting solution from some higher law yet undiscovered. The influence of electricity on the vital functions is still a very unsettled problem, and the conflicting results obtained by experiment impair the evidence which science requires for their adoption. But the great mystery here, to which all others are subordinate, centres in the simple question. What is Electricity ? what the actual nature of the element thus wonderfully propertied, and, as we have reason to believe, fulfilling in other and remote worlds the func- tions through which we know it in our own ? In that general conception of the unity of creation expressed heretofore in the phenomena of light and gravitation, but now enforced upon us by so many new and unex- pected evidences, we cannot refuse to admit Electricity as one of those great cosmical agents which combine and control the elements of power and action in the universe at large. But reason is not to be satisfied with magniloquent phrases. The question comes back upon us. What is 342 laugel's problems of mature and life. Electricity ? It is one which has tried, but vainly, the genius of many philosophers of our time, Faraday among the latest. True genius like his can afford to admit failure, and is ever ready to make the confession. The question still remains unsolved ; a problem for the labours — or, it may be, for some felicitous accident — of the future. We have spoken of electricity as an element^ but this term does nothing more than shelter elementary ignorance of its nature. With all our various knowledge of electrical phenomena, the first letters are yet wanting to the alphabet of the science. We speak of positive and negative electricity, of poles and cur- rents, of induction, of quantity and intensity, of electro- magnetic actions, &c., but we still conceive and define these conditions solely by their effects. The question still recurs. What is Electricity ? No step can be made to its answer without facing another question. Is Electricity a material agent, special in its endowments as such ? Or is it merely a property or condition of matter, deriving its phenomena from the atomic and molecular changes which matter in its many known forms is ever undergoing ? To halt before this question is virtually to suspend enquiry. But have we not cogent reason, taking the largest view of the phenomena, for regarding electricity as itself a material element ? The methods by which we elicit, accumulate, and conduct it, whatever theoretical difficulties they involve, are far better comprehended upon this hypothesis than under the vague view of their depending on atomic actions of the bodies electri- cally affected. To speak of polar states or chemical LAUGELS PROBLEMS OF K\TURE AND LIFE. 343 changes in the atoms of matter as constituting elec- tricity, is but to hide the real difficulty. In electrical actions there is something evolved — a power capable of conduction to unlimited distances with equal velocity to that of light. This conduction, as it occurs through wires, bears cogently on the question. The differences of effect produced by the varying material, thickness and length of these conductors, c^n hardly be recon- ciled with other views than that of a specific agent, acting in a certain ratio to its quantity and intensity, and capable of being estimated under these relations. The properties of quantity and intensity, and still more the faculty of being concentrated and accumulated within determinate spaces, especially characterise elec- tricity, and associate it closely with those conditions which designate matter to our knowledge. If we admit this, another question at once arises. Can we identify this electric element with any other known agent in the natural world ? What we need- fully require is some agent cosmical in the largest sense of the word, since the electric influence is present, not solely in the atomic and molecular changes of matter, but in regions of space far beyond our sphere. This universality led Faraday to conjecture some direct con- nexion between the force of gravitation and the electric power ; but he failed in finding any experimental proof of this hypothesis, and avowed the failure. But before hurrying to the theory of a new and special power (a bare assumption, complicating yet more the knotty problem of the elementary forces), we are bound to see whether any natural element, 344 laugel's peoblems of natuee and life. already recognised, will so far answer the conditions required as to be plausible in itself, and not to involve any physical impossibility. Such element we venture to believe may possibly be found in the ether of space ; and as this hypothesis, though not wholly new to science, has yet been only partially advocated, we must ask to be allowed a few words in its illustration. Under the provisional name of Ether we recognise in space around us, a medium capable of transmitting the direct and reflected waves of light and heat, and itself physically necessary for such transmission. While forced to call this medium imponderable, its materiality must be inferred from the very nature of the functions •it performs. Vast and complex though these be, we cannot hmit them to outer space only. We find full evidence from optical and other phenomena that ether interpenetrates and pervades the densest bodies on which it pours its waves. May we not assume the fact generally, that where it comes into contact with our atmosphere and the grosser forms of terrestrial matter, it assumes other conditions and properties than when diffused equably and continuously through space ? Ee- flected and refracted we know its waves to be. May they not also be condensed, accumulated, evolved, conducted in currents, and otherwise modified by the kind of matter thus pervaded, and the changes this undergoes from other causes acting upon it ? Without assuming a knowledge we do not possess of the infini- tesimal actions of the atoms and molecules of matter, we may at least deem it certain that the agency of ether, impinging upon and penetrating them, cannot be laugel's peoblems of nature and life. 345 limited to the phenomena expressed by hght and heat only ; or that its elasticity, tenuity, velocity of wave- motion, &c. remain unaltered, when coming into that close atomic coalescence which all analogy tells us to be the condition of most energetic physical action. If faihng to bring direct proof of the presence of ether in the subtle phenomena, let us see whether elec- tricity may not fairly be invoked as its representative and real substitute. What, in short, is there to forbid the conception that electricity is the ether itself — not existing as when diffused through interplanetary and stellar space, but from its embodiment with terrestrial matter — solid, fluid, or gaseous — quickened into new conditions ; acting or acted upon in all atomic changes ; and in certain of these extricated in such quantity and manner as to become a power in the hands of man ? Can an agent such as we must suppose ether to be lie dormant in the innermost interstices of matter, while the smallest change of condition, even by friction or the simple apposition of different bodies, awakens another power within them into life and energy? Is it probable or possible that two distinct elements should co-exist in the same interstitial spaces, with separate relations to the matter thus environing them ? We put these points interrogatively, but they are surely such as may sanction hypothesis, in default of any more absolute answer to the question, ' What is Electricity?' The velocity of the electric current in its close approximation to that of the ether waves of light may be admitted into the argument for identity. All 346 LAUGEL'S PROBLE^fS OP NATURE AND LIFE. such facts give proof of the astonishing subtlety and mobihty of the element concerned, and of its capacity to assume altered physical aspects when brought into contact with the ponderable forms of matter. It is not requisite to vindicate this hypothesis in its application to all the phenomena of electricity, when every other theory has failed to interpret them. The problem of the two electricities embraces the most arduous of these questions — departing from all recog- nised properties of other powers, and still a barrier to the boldest conjecture. But there is nothing here to contradict the view of ether as the agent concerned — nothing certainly to establish the claim of any other element. The difficulty, being equal and alike under any hypothesis, may fairly be eliminated from the argu- ment. And the same may be said of those magnetic relations of electricity, which in the phenomena of dia- magnetism and magnetic lines of force, of magneto- crystallic action, and of the direct action of the magnet on electric currents, offer many questions of supreme difficulty, but not more insuperable on the view which identifies the electric element with ether than on any other. Several other points might be urged on behalf of the hypothesis, had we space for them — such as the meteorological relations of electricity, and the wonder- ful phenomena exhibited by the crystalline texture in connexion with light and electricity. Still, however, it is obvious that the argument is one of presumption only, and from the very nature of its conditions will never probably get beyond this. But we think that it LAUGEL'S PROBLEMS OF NATURE AND LIFE. 347 merits to be brought tlius far before our readers, both from its intrinsic plausibihty and as an example of the great questions which are now currently discussed in the scientific world. The third of M. Laugel's volumes comes before us entitled 'Problemes de la Vie,' a title expressing at once the mysteries of the subject, and, to those w^ho have read his preceding volumes, the line of thought and argument he is likely to pursue in dealing with them. Leaning towards materialism, yet not in the sam.e hard and exclusive sense as Virchow, Vogt, and other German writers, he seeks, as far as possible, to bring vital functions within the domain of ordinary physics ; and argues, as others have done, against the use or abuse of those terms, ' vital principle,' 'vital force,' ' vital energy,' which have been employed to veil our igno- rance of the reality. Eefraining from analysis, or any general adoption of his opinions, we think it better to present to our readers a summary view (in sequel to an article many years ago) of what science and specula- tion are still doing in this ample field of enquiry. The first of the ' Problems of Life ' lies in the question ' What is Life ? ' It has undergone a dozen definitions ; some by eminent authorities, but all liable more or less to objections from error, incompleteness, or obscurity. The problem has pressed upon every age of mankind, and in our own time has been brought into connexion with the latest discoveries of physical science. Still, however, we need a definition which may satisfy all the conditions without becoming value- less from its generality. That given us by Aristotle, 348 laugel's problems of nature and life. though clouded by some terms of Greek philosophy, is as good as any that have succeeded it. The well- known definition of Bichat, ' La vie est I'ensemble des fonctions qui resistent a la mort/ and that of the En- cyclopedic, ' La vie est le contraire de la mort,' are too epigrammatically negative to be of any use. They omit, too, that which is the very essence of all life, viz., the faculty of reproducing life, more or less like in kind to itself. 'No definition can be good which does not include the condition of an organisation ca- pable by sexual or other means of such reproduction. We think, too, that Time should be admitted as one element in the definition sought for. Every form of life, endlessly dissimilar though these be, has its average period and limit of existence, as well as a certain defined chronometry of all its functions. Growth, maturity, final decay, and death belong to living organisation in its every shape on earth. An eminent philosopher of our own time describes life as ' consisting in the continuous adjustment of internal relations to external relations ' — a definition which loses value in its generality. A power of adjust- ment, indeed, brings us close to that conception of a vital principle, which we have just noticed as one of the vexed questions of physiology. We alluded to it cursorily when speaking of the vital forces, but must add a few words here, to denote more explicitly what we think to be the true conclusion on the matter. We cannot assert on actual proof that life is engendered by, or engenders, any power or force peculiar to itself. Nevertheless in recognising, which we must do, that LAUGELS PROBLEMS OP NATURE AND LIFE. 349 there is some definite mode of action in living bodies, giving to them forms and properties unknown else- where in nature, and transforming known forces so as to appropriate them to the peculiar functions of life, we virtually admit a special and characteristic power, call it what we will. The facts connected with genera- tion and those of hereditary resemblance are alone sufficient to point to some cause, physical it may be, but not known to us by actual identity or analogy with any other physical power. Whence but from some such cause — occult to us — can it be that a single germ or germs, proteine or pro- toplasm (the names here signify little) should evolve by gradual accretion of matter the likeness of an anterior being, even in minute peculiarities of form and feature, these same peculiarities, morbid as well as natural, often recurring after one or two generations have been in- terposed.^^ The animal economy throughout, in its instincts as well as structure, enforces the same conclu- sion — a negative one, it may be called, but it is better to rest in this than to attempt a blind and useless definition. All that can be said is, that there exists something we do not comprehend. The controversy now going on will continue, because we possess no crucial proof or argument to close it. In this it is like many other questions similarly contested. ^ This problem, if it could be solved, would carry us far deeper into the arcana of creation than any other attainment of science. Mr. Darwin, feeling this fully, has in his last work modestly but very ingeniously encountered the question by an hypothesis, which, if unproved, and in its nature incapable of proof, is at least as probable as any that can be devised. His chapter, entitled Pangenesis, deserves to be studied, if but to call attention to what we may term the necessities of the problem. 350 laugel's problems of nature and life. In what, and how, and when, did hfe begin on our globe? In its lowest aspects, whether animal or vegetable, we see nothing more than a few material elements, aggregated under the simplest forms ; with few organic functions, yet these such in kind as to preserve existence for a certain time — to provide for a succession of similar existences — and this fulfilled, to expire. From these simple conditions (taking animal life as best for illustration) we find a series rising up- wards to forms and functions the most complex and complete. In no part of this ascending scale is there any wide gap ; what in many cases seemed such having been, partially at least, filled up by recent dis- covery in the living or the fossil world. However this series may have begun, and whether it has been worked out by derivation or evolution within itself, or by successive acts of creative power, equally must we affirm the unity of the whole, and the necessity of a First and Supreme designing Cause. If the endless forms, functions, and instincts of life which surround us be derived by progressive changes in unmeasured time from a few primitive types of being, such changes bespeak certain vital laws acting on matter through and concurrently with the other great forces of the natural world. Under any and every view of the sub- ject, intention by a higher Power, however obscure to man as the interpreter, is manifest as the foundation of the whole — the sole standing-point to our reason, when regarding the origin, varieties, and perpetuation of animal life on the earth. This recognised, we are better prepared to meet laugel's problems of nature axd life. 351 the several questions which science has suggested or speculation created upon the subject. And the first we encounter here is one of the most momentous ; that, namely, which respects ' Spontaneous Genera- tion, ' an enquiry bequeathed to us in a vague form from remote antiquity, and recently revived under conditions of very delicate experimental research. The question simply is, Can matter of any kind, under any circumstances, generate life, without the presence of the ova or germs of prior life ? Though the enquiry has applied itself only to the lower forms of infusoria, whose motions under the microscope may almost be called a mockery of hfe, yet it is one of deep interest, whatever the issue ; involving, as it does, in connexion with recent doctrines of derivation and development, the whole question of the origin of life on the earth. This interest is testified by the keenness of controversy going on. The careful and refined researches of Pastern' and Pouchet, on opposite sides of the question, in France, have been carried forward by English ob- servers, with not less skill in experiment ; yet the contest still goes on, even angrily, as to these units of creation : whether the old doctrine shall be maintained, ' Omne vivum a vivo,' or whether inorganic matter may not, under certain conditions, assume the lower characters of life ? If called upon to give any judgment where asser- tions are thus conflicting, and the tests of truth so diflScult, it would be in favour of the former of these opinions; while admitting that we have no absolute proof to gainsay the latter. One might well borrow 352 laugel's problems of ^^\ture axd life. here the phrase of ' De minimis non curat lex^ ' for the objects are too small and evanescent to furnish the evidence required for conviction. But the question is still under judgment ; and the enquiry, even without any positive issue, will probably disclose collateral secrets in that great volume of nature which is now so diligently explored. We have no room to speak of those many recent discoveries in zoology and fossil geology illustrating at once the ancient conditions of the earth, and the multitudinous forms of life which have successively existed and been extinguished on its surface. Vast as is now the catalogue of animal species, or what are called such, every year is adding to it. Nothing, indeed, more startles contemplation than the quantity of life upon the ea.rth. Around us, above us, below us — air, ocean, lake, river, mountain, plain, and forest — all nature teems with it, from the whale, elephant, bufialo, and eagle down to the monads and vibrios of infusorial life. And in this contemplation we must include the great law of nature which makes animal life, in its every shape and grade, depend for evolution and maintenance upon life already existing — a law strikingly attested even in those parasitic creations now so numerously catalogued as to form a distinct portion of natural science. Death is the transmigration, not of heing^ but of the materials of being ^ into new forms and modes of existence. And connected with this law we are called upon to recog- nise another fact in the general scheme of creation, viz., the obvious and constant provision for the main- tenance of succession, even at the expense of individual laugel's problems of nature and life. 353 lives. Among the insects it is common to find those propagating hfe perish as soon as this function is ful- filled. We cannot explain these things, but must admit their reality. Still less can we with our reason confront another problem of much deeper interest — viz., the relation of man to the other forms of animal creation peo- pling the earth. Surrounded on every side by living beings — using them, consciously or unconsciously, as food, and even inhaling them with every breath — this question inevitably and closely presses upon human thought. In one point (and that the very important doctrine of derivation) it comes into contact with the Darwinian theory, and carries much of present and future controversy with it in this connexion. But there are other and less equivocal modes of viewing the relation of Man to other animals. The simplest is that which regards him as the head of the living crea- tion — the latest probably, certainly the loftiest — in that long series of existences which we follow downwards till animal life is lost in the lower organisms of the vegetable world. But this is a feeble outhne of all that the question involves. Within the series just denoted he whole volumes of facts, inviting or almost compelling research. The careless thinker may let his reason go to sleep on this admitted human supremacy. The philosopher, looking on the dog crouched at his feet, sees in him an animal with organisation variously akin to his own, and some senses even more perfect — with intelhgence, memory, feelings, and passions of the same kind, however difiering in degree and manner of A A 354 laugel's problems op nature and life. use — with appetites and necessities of life similar also, though more in subordination to instincts and here- ditary habits of the species. The idle spectator gazes on the anthropoid ape with mere merriment at this mockery of human form and gesture — /xt/AT^/Aara Trjs avOpoiirivy}^ la)rj<; — as Aristotle calls it. The man of deeper thought cannot stand in face of these creatures without a certain feeling of awe, in the contemplation of that mysterious scheme which has brought them thus near to himself in the scale of being. Pascal says, ' II est dangereux de trop faire voir a I'homme combien il est egal aux betes sans lui montrer sa grandeur. II est encore dangereux de lui trop faire voir sa grandeur sans sa bassesse.' The caution is chiefly needed for philosophers, since to mankind at large famiharity disguises this great wonder of the world of life. How few fairly accost the question, Whence and why this astonishing profusion and variety of animal existence, not solely that now under our eyes, but what has been entombed during uncounted ages in the rocks beneath our feet ? ' It cannot for a moment be contended that the great scheme of creation had Man solely in view. These innumerable vestiges of life, at periods far antecedent to his own time on earth, might alone suffice to disprove this. Equally is it negatived by our knowledge of existing life. It would not be too much to affirm, were such vague affirmation worth having, that not one-hundredth part of the animal creation, counted by species, has any direct relation or ministry to Man. He is at the sum- mit of the series, and in his highest cultivation far laugel's problems of natuhe and life. 355 above the summit; but still lie is a member of this series, and to be regarded as such. We here approach a very interesting relation of Man to the inferior animals, one involving the whole question of reason and instinct, and beset with difficul- ties not easy to overcome. Broadly speaking, indeed, we may assert, that in the whole scale of being, from Man downwards, these two faculties are found in in- verse ratio to one another. But in reality it is often wholly impossible to separate them. They co-exist, and are in such way blended together that each has power to modify or contravene the other. It is diffi- cult to gauge exactly in other animals faculties and functions which we find it hard enough to define in ourselves ; and it is only by taking the most character- istic cases of reason and instinct in animals that we can rightly discriminate between them. Yet the distinc- tion is a momentous one, and especially interesting in relation to Man as the intellectual ruler of the earth. Had we space for it much might be said regarding that faculty of reason among the higher animals, both wild and domesticated, to which we have already slightly alluded. Its existence is familiarly recognised in the phrases habitually applied to them ; yet this very familiarity enfeebles, as in so many other cases, that sentiment of wonder which the fact might well inspire. Of their reasoning faculty no happier definition can be given than that of Cuvier : ' Leur intelligence execute des operations du meme genre.' Milton says in more guarded phrase, ' They reason not contemp- tibly.' Locke, while conceding reason, denied to them A A 2 356 LAUGELS PROBLEMS OP NATURE AND LIFE. the power of forming ' abstract or general ideas.' Taking the simplest view, we may affirm with Cuvier, that the kind of reason is virtually the same, however narrow in its scope and combinations. The mute syllogism of the monkey, or the dog, or elephant, is perfect as far as it goes, and might be translated into speech or writing.^ It is less easy to speak of reflection as a part of their intelligence, and yet this term cannot well be excluded. That they possess and largely employ the memory of objects and events is indisputable, but we have not equal proof as to that more intellectual faculty of recollection — the y^vrnir) orvvOeriKri — to which the mind of Man owes so much of its power and attainments. Another question occurs as to their power of forecasting the future. An old English writer speaks of ' the boon to animals that they are nescient of evils to come.' Partially this may be true even as to the highest ; but we cannot deny them the simple faculty of anticipating events near at hand, and 'which come into sequence with others of wonted occur- rence. To these intellectual faculties we may add one more, in the ' sense of humour^' so conspicuous in many animals, though not duly noticed in the inference it affords. The gambols and sly artifices of monkeys well depicture the sports and tricks of human child- hood. The dog, toying with his master or gambolling with other dogs, evinces his feeling of fun as plainly as if it were put into words. And reflection will show; how much lies beneath this single and simple fact, 1 Cicero, indeed, speaks of the * mens, ratio et memoria ' of the ant, qualities which, in this case, as in the bee, we now ascribe to instinct, though not without a certain hesitation where to draw the line. laugel's problems of nature and life. 357 As respects the passions and affections of the animals thus near to our confines, we must regard them as alike in kind to those which compose the moral nature of man, though very different in objects, and wanting the nice shades of human character in its various grades of cultivation. Without running into subtle distinctions of name or nature, it is enough to recite simply the common qualities open to all observation. Such are love and hatred, emulation and jealousy, anger and revenge, gratitude, boldness and fortitude, pride, and perhaps vanity, cowardice, and cunning. These quali- ties are not defined by difference of species only. As in man they characterise individuals of the same species, and are innate, more or less, in the tempera- ment of each. It does not concern us here to trace these animal faculties and feelings downwards in the scale till they vanish in the bare instincts of existence. On this sub- ject of instincts, however, a few words must be said, though volumes would be needed to embrace their wonderful history. M. Laugel's title ' Problemes de la Vie' well characterises phenomena which perplexed the mind of Newton, and continue to embarrass the philosophers of our own day. We have already spoken of the affinities of reason and instinct. There is, in fact, a border-land, where they are strangely and inextricably blended, each invading the domain of the other, and reciprocally producing changes, which variously affect the functions of both. Acts primarily of reason and volition pass by repetition into habits having the compulsory force of instinct, and often 358 laugel's problems of nature and life. transmissible to offspring ; while instincts, forcibly in- terfered with, often evolve new faculties of action, which, if we shrink from calhng them acts of reason, can only be understood as newly-developed forms of instinct — a difficult conception, indeed, in seeking to reahse which we plunge at once into the inner mys- teries of the question. What is the power at work in the purely instinctive acts of animal life ? — in the in- stincts, for example, of the bee, the ant, the spider, the salmon, the beaver, the tailor and weaver birds, and endless others ? The instances most familiar to us re- present in effect the marvel of the whole, and put the question of origin into its most cogent shape. Newton found no other solution than that the Author of life is himself the inoving power in the innumerable forms of instinct — risking in this the charge of pantheism, that barrier at which so many attempts to reach what is unreachable come to an end. We cannot err, however, in regarding life, and the generation of life from life, as integral parts of the same great problem. Instincts, define or distinguish them as we will, are strictly appurtenances of gene- ration — of that power which transmits hereditary hke- ness from one generation of a species to another. The question whether, and how far, they are dependent on mere bodily organisation, merges in this, though we can hardly say that it thereby comes nearer to any sure solution. That many instincts have a special organisation adapted to them is too well known to need illustration ; and it is equally certain that changes in organs, arising from external causes, may, LAUGELS PROBLEMS OF NATURE AND LIFE. 359 and often do, produce modifications of the natural in- stincts, and render them hereditary in the race or species. But the fact still remains that there are numerous and extraordinary instincts which can in no- wise be interpreted by organisation, though this is used for their fulfilment. The structural peculiarities of certain birds and fishes are necessary for their periodical migrations by land and sea. But the act of migration itself is the marvel ; determinate as to place, time, and method — guided by no sense or reason we can define or conceive, yet fulfilling purposes .with a certitude no reason could attain. Instincts prospective in their nature, as we admire them in the nests of birds — the sexual instincts and those cpnnected with food, appetencies essential to life on the earth — the instincts of the bee-hive and ant-hill, which sacrifice the inte- rests of the individual creature to those of the com- munity — these and endless others come under the same head, as acts not due to reason nor to any apparent structure. We are still, then, confronted by the profound pro- blem of a power acting in and through the complex fabric of animal life, of which neither our senses nor reason can render any account. In connecting it with the larger problem of the generation of life from life, we suggest an absolute and necessary relation, but do not solve the mystery. Science is zealously working in this direction, but, as we believe, with an insuper- able barrier at some point in its progress. We have spoken of a border-land between reason and instinct, >vhere these two faculties variously and curiously com- 360 laugel's pkoblems of nature and life. mingle. It is here, if anywhere, that we may hope to obtain some enlargement and clearer definition of our knowledge. Little is gained by multiplying examples of individual instincts, wonderful though these be, and meriting a better classification than any yet adopted. What we need and desire is some great work, founded on actual research, but treating the subject also as one of general philosophy, and holding in view certain definite questions for solution. Such are the relation as to priority or causality between the organisation and the particular instincts of species — all that con- cerns the hereditary nature of instincts — their depend- ence on habits and the casual conditions of life, including here the Reparation of species into races — and the influence upon them of reason and the will. These questions, were there no others, present ample material for future enquiry. Time, as well as com- bined and zealous research, will be needed even for their partial solution. But w^e confidently hope for some such work as that we have indicated, giving us closer approach to that mysterious part of life where mental and material functions, intelligence and in- stincts, are linked together, either in co-operation or conflict. One result of all research must be deemed certain — the recognition of an Almighty Power far above our comprehension in its nature and attributes, but ruling throughout all creation, living and lifeless, by laws and forces which we may partially but never can wholly understand. 'I had rather believe,' said Lord Bacon, ' all the fables in the Legend, and the Talmud, and the Alcoran, than that this universal laugel's problems of nature and life. 361 frame is without a mind.' To which Archbishop Wh^tely adds, in his note upon the passage : 'That the possession of power, strictly so called, by physical causes, is not conceivable, or their capacity to main- tain, any more than to produce at first, the system of the universe, whose combined existence, as well as its origin, seems to depend on the continued operations of the great Creator.' Those who are familiar w^ith the doctrine of Mr. Darwin as to the origin of species — a doctrine now so largely, though not unanimously, accepted in the scientific world — will at once see how closely it is in- terwoven in every part with the topics we have been discussing. The questions of origin, organisation, modes of reproduction and instincts, enter integrally and necessarily into any theory of which life is the subject. The naturalist is amply justified in seeking all possible evidence as to the progressive evolution of genera and species, and their distribution over the earth ; and here Mr. Darwin has rendered services to science which will be fully recognised hereafter, what- ever exception be taken to some of the views he has espoused. But these fundamental questions still re- main, and our knowledge can never be complete as long as they are unresolved. In the foregoing article, which we must here close, we have sought to make our readers acquainted with the principal questions and objects of research on which physical science is at this time engaged ; neces- sarily, however, omitting many which might well merit notice. At no period has there been more of gran- 362 laugel's problems of nature and life. deur in these objects, or more of genius directed to their investigation. If sometimes this genius rushes beyond human bounds into the inscrutable mysteries of the universe, it is speedily checked by the sterner demand now made for evidence of fact and truth ; while even these forays, as they may be called, of speculative science (in one of which we have ourselves partially indulged), though failing to attain their pur- pose, are not unfrequently useful in disclosing new paths and objects of pursuit collateral to those thus vainly attempted. 363 MAURY ON SLEEP AND DREAMS} [CoNTfilBUTED TO THE ' EdINBUKGH ReVIEW ' IN 1873.] We place M. Maury's volume at the head of this article, as one of the most recent and remarkable on the phenomena of Sleep and Dreams. He is among the few authors who have made them the subject of experiment as well as of simple observation. But in reviewing his work we shall have occasion to refer to several others, in which these phenomena are treated of, either especially or as a part of human physiology ; many of them works of much intrinsic value, though not, as we think, wholly exhausting the subject. Atten- tion has been somewhat too exclusively given to the physical causes and conditions of sleep, without adequate notice of the wonderful characters which connect it with the other portion of our existence ; rendering it, through dreams, an interpreter of many of those complex relations of mind and body which have perplexed philo- sophy in every age of the world. Sleep and dreams may justly be deemed one of the great mysteries of our nature. Our knowledge of them is far from having reached the realities of a science. Many of the pro- blems, physical -and pyschological, they involve are among the most profound in mental philosophy, and ^ Le Sommeil et les Reves. Par L. F. Alfred Maury, Membre de rinstitut. Troisieme Edition. Paris, 1865. 364 MAURY ON SLEEP AND DREAMS. meet us at the very threshold of the enquiry. And if some of these questions do admit of solution, others are so deeply hidden in the ultimate mystery of the mind itself as to be wholly inscrutable by any means human reason can apply to them. It may seem strange to many "of our readers that we should preface the subject of Sleep and Dreams by phrases thus grave and forbidding in their tenor. Acts so famihar, and periodically habitual in our lives, might be thought of easy interpretation. The sleep of the rocking -cradle, of the bed, of the arm-chair or car- riage, witnessed in their ever-recurring routine, would seem to tell all that can or need be known on these subjects. But it is this very famiharity which disguises their nature, and begets indifference to the greatest marvel of our existence. This, indeed, is one of the numerous instances where we look heedlessly upon phenomena become habitual to us, but which, seen as solitary or infrequent events, are the subjects of admira- tion or terror. We gaze with careless eye on the daily march of the sun through the heavens, on the midnight magnificence of the starry sky. Our wonder and awe are reserved for the comet or the eclipse. We witness the flowing and ebbing of the ocean and river tides at their calculated times, ignorant or indifferent to the fact that these changes express the action of the greatest law of the universe. Travelling by railroad, we look with idle eyes on those thin wire line!5, traversing the air beside us, which at the very moment are carry- ing currents of electricity under human bidding — the instantaneous transmitters of human language MAURY OK SLEKP AND DREAMS. 365 and tliought. We think and speak, we see and hear, breathe and walk, indifferent as to the nature of these marvellous functions, or how their unceasing work is carried on. And well it is for our happiness, and for the integrity of the functions themselves, that it should be so. The mere act of mental attention to any one of them is enough to alter or disturb its natural action — a fact of supreme importance in human physiology. All this is eminently true as regards the subject be- fore us. An habitual indifference to the phenomena of sleep is found as much among men of general in- teUigence as in the mass of the unthinking world. Assembled in the morning round the breakfast-table, we laugh and jest over tales of the dreams of the night; not reflecting that these wild and entangled vagaries — illusions as to persons, time, and place — are part and parcel of that continuous personal identity which at other times manifests itself in acts of reason, discourse, and deliberate functions of the will. We are jesting here upon things which have perplexed the philosophy of all ages. No less a problem than the intimate nature of the human soul is concerned in these phenomena. Where more than a fourth part of life, even in its adult and healthiest stages, is passed in sleeping and dreaming, these functions must be taken as an integral and necessary part of our existence — not less natural than our waking acts, and associated with them by various intermediate phenomena, to which we shall presently allude. These phenomena, indeed, may be said really to maintain that unity of the thinking and conscious being which in other ways they seem so 366 MAURY ON SLEEP AND DREAMS. strangely to disturb. A line of rigid demarcation be- tween the states of waking and sleeping might well appear to dissever this unity. But no such line exists ; and it may readily be shown, under appeal to individual experience, that these various states endlessly commingle and graduate into each other ; thus affording mutual illustration, and, as w^e believe, a more intimate know- ledge of the mysteries of the human mind than can be obtained from any other source. It would hardly be worth while to preface what we have to say on Sleep and Dreams by citing what ancient writers — philosophers, physicians, and poets — have be- queathed to us on the subject. The phenomena were to them the same as to us — the dream, perhaps, more exciting to the imagination from its connexion with various superstitions of the age. Seeing, indeed, the tendency of their mythology and poetry to deify what- ever is wonderful in man or nature, it is not surprising that they should clothe these great functions of life with a personality, vague indeed in kind, but such as to satisfy the popular and poetic feeling of the time. Nor can we wonder that they should have been the subjects of superstitious belief, seeing how variously and strangely these functions are blended with the spiritual part of our nature. Even now, when science imposes so many new checks upon credulity, the in- spired dream — the ''Ovap e/c Aios — has its occasional place among other still less rational behefs of the world. Aristotle, whose chapters on Sleep and Dreams rank foremost of all that the ancients have left us on the subject, says on the question of inspiration of MAURY OX SLEEP AND DREAMS. 367 dreams, that it is not easy ' either to despise the evi- dence or to be convinced by it ' {ovre Kara^povrjcrai paSiov^ ovre Tret^i^i'ai). But with his wonted sagacity he indicates the reasons which justify distrust as to a Divine interposition, thus partial and frivolous in its alleged ministrations to man. He sees clearly that the event is often the parent of the prophetic dream, and that in the endless and complex relations of human life it must needfully happen that coincidences often occur without any real relation to the events ' so associated. These chapters of Aristotle well deserve perusal as evidences of the clear and acute inteUigence of this great philosopher. We have acquired more knowledge of the physiology of sleep as a vital func- tion, but in its connexion with dreams are little ad- vanced beyond what he has told us. Cicero, in his second book, ' De Divinatione,' dis- cusses the question whether there be a divine influence occasionally embodied in dreams still more largely and conclusively. Called upon to confront strong popular superstitions, he meets them fairly and boldly. But beyond this negative conclusion his treatise does little to illustrate the phenomena or philosophy of the func- tions in question. While revelling in the beauty of the poetry, ancient and modern, which has found a theme in sleep and dreams — and none more fertile for fancy to work upon — we cannot look for any fresh knowledge from this source. Lucretius, indeed, with his supreme mastery of verse, comprises something of the philosophy of dreams in his grand description of tliera. From Homer 368 MAURY OX SLEEP AND DREAMS. and the Greek dramatists down to Virgil, Ovid, Statins, &c., we have abundant passages finely describing or invoking sleep, but it is the poetry only of the subject. We must not, however, quit this topic without referring to those many striking passages in Shakspeare where the genius of the man revels in the wild, fantastic world of our sleeping existence. He grasped human nature too universally to leave untouched this wonderful part of it. We need but refer to the passages in ' Henry IV.,' ' Eichard in.,' ' Eomeo and Juliet,' 'Macbeth,' and ' Midsummer Night's Dream,' in proof of what we are saying. The memory of our readers will furnish them with numerous other passages on the subject from English, German, and Italian poets, but none, we think, so abounding in thought and poetry as those of Shakspeare. We have already stated our reason for taking M. Maury's volume as the text for our article. We learn from his preface that he has zealously devoted himself to the subject for a long series of years, embodying his researches in successive publications, of which this is the latest. These researches comprise certain curious methods of experiment, ingeniously devised, and, as far as we know, never systematically used before. We cannot better illustrate these methods than by giving his own words. After speaking of the need of long, continuous, and cautious observation, to obtain any assured results, he adds : — Je m'observe tantot dans mon lit, tantot dans mon fauteuil, au moment ou le sommeil me gagne. Je note MAURY ON SLEEP AND DREAMS. 369 exactemenfc dans quelles dispositions je me trouvais avant de m'endormir ; et je prie la personne qui est pr^s de moi de m'eveiller a des instants plus ou moins eloignes du moment oil je me suis assoupi. Eeveille en sursaut, la memoire du reve, auquel on m'a soudainement arrache, est encore presente a mon esprit, dans la fraicheur meme de I'impression. II m'est alors facile de rapprocher les details de ce reve des cir- constances ou je m'etais place pour m'endormir. Je consigne sur un cahier ces observations, comme le fait im medecin pour les cas qu'il observe. Et en relisant le repertoire que je me suis ainsi dresse, j'ai saisi entre des reves qui s'etaient produits a diverses epoques de ma vie, des coincidences, des analogies dont la similitude des circonstances qui les avaient provoquees m'ont bien souvent donne la clef.' M. Maury goes on to state tlie necessity of having a coadjutor with him in this inquiry, not solely for the purpose here mentioned of being awakened at particu- lar times, but also for the due observation of what may be called the utterances of sleep. Sounds made and words spoken by the sleeper, must be recorded in rela- tion to the dreams afterwards remembered. Even simple attitudes and movements of the body, especially such as express agitation, require the same record, and for the same purpose. M. Maury mentions his own habits as to sleep, as being singularly favourable to these methods of observation ; and we are well disposed to believe in the results thus obtained. Nevertheless, the chances of error are so great in this land of sha- dows, that we should be glad to find the research taken up by others, with such variations as individual tempe- rament may suggest. It is obvious that the latter point is one of singular importance. The sleep and dreams of one man interpret only partially and doubtfully B B 370 MAURY ON SLEEP AND DREAMS. those of another, and we must check as well as multiply the proofs before setting down anything as certain. In common life, the very nature of a dream gives a sanc- tion to a loose or exaggerated relation of it. No one is disposed to quarrel with the relater for filling up gaps in his dream with the little parentheses needed to complete his story ; or, if a little of the marvellous be brought into the subject — one of those strange coinci- dences to which the vision of the night contributes its part — we generally find truth more deeply trespassed upon. Stories, vague and loose in their origin, are made more compact by successive additions, and often go on from one generation to another, acquiring a sort of spurious credit from age, and from the impossibility of refuting them by any living evidence. We come now more directly to the subject before us, embodying, as M. Maury has done, under a single title our consideration of these great acts of life — Sleep and Dreaming. They cannot, in truth, be treated of separately. Their conjunction is so general, if not uni- versal, and they are linked together by such complex ties, that we are almost compelled to view them as a single function of our being. Still there are certain considerations which must be admitted as possible grounds of distinction. "We cannot prove that the con- junction of sleep and dreams is absolute and universal. There may be times and conditions of sleep, in which there is a total inactivity of brain — a complete absence of those images and trains of thought which form the dream. In connexion with this comes the further con- sideration, that sleep is a necessity of our nature — a MAURY ON SLEEP AXD DREAMS. 371 state required for the rest and repair of functions, both bodily and mental, which are incapable of being repaired in any other way. The same cannot be said of dreams. They depend on functions of the brain, which, though unchecked by the senses and the will, and distorted in their mode of action, are yet identical in kind with those which are exercised in evolving the thoughts and emotions of the waking state. The notion of repair and restoration can hardly therefore be associated with the act of dreaming. Frequent experience, moreover, teaches us that what we call ' unrefreshing nights ' are attended by troublous dreams ; and, though this may often admit of other explanation, yet is the fact signifi- cant as regards the distinction just drawn. The repose and restoration obtained from sleep would seem to be in an inverse ratio to the intensity of the dreams at- tending it. Is there then any condition or moment of sleep absolutely devoid of dreaming ? a state in which all thoughts and emotions, whether connected or vaguely incongruous, are annulled, and om- mental or conscious existence lost in the simple physical condition of sleep? The import of this question will readily be understood. The answer might seem easy, but is far from being so. Positive proof is wholly wanting, and the only evi- dence attainable is that derived from the memory of the dreamer, or the observations of those who watch him during those hours of which he has no remem- brance. It is certain from such observation, and in- deed from common experience, that dreams are of very frequent occurrence, of which all instant memory B B 2 372 MAURY ON SLEEP AND DREAMS. is lost. Aristotle, in discussing this very topic, puts the question, why some sleep occurs with dreams, other sleep without? or, if always dreaming, why some dreams are remembered, others not ? The ques- tion, so propounded, marks the clear intelligence of the philosopher. In the memory or oblivion of dreams we trace their connexion with our physical organi- sation, and thus gain a step, though a slight one, to the better understanding of their nature. The doubt just denoted as to the universality of dreams during sleep, has continued to our time. If ever resolved, it must be by some such methods as those adopted by M. Maury. He does not himself, in- deed, meet the question in its distinct form, or dwell upon its profound metaphysical relations. Other writers on the subject, among whom we may name Sir ¥/illiam Hamilton, Sir Henry Holland, Drs. Carpenter, Laycock, and Macnish, have severally, in one way or other, encountered this problem. Lord Brougham has grappled with it, amidst the many other questions which exercised his bold and facile pen. He considers dreams an incidental not a constant part of sleep — a sort of fringe edging its borders. Sir W. Hamilton, on the contrary, believes that no condition of sleep exists without dreaming; but all have felt the difficulty of dealing only with incomplete or negative evidence, and the question remains in abeyance for future research or hypothesis to work upon. Hypothesis and speculation may well indeed be awakened by this particular mystery of our nature. In theory we cannot affirm that a total suspension of MAURY ON SLEEP AND DREAMS. 373 the mental functions is more impossible than the actual changes they undergo in dreaming, in the delirium of fever, insanity, intoxication, and other morbid condi- tions of the brain. The sleep of the newly-born in- fant cannot be construed otherwise than as a state in which sensorial actions either do not exist, or are limited to some vague recurrence of the simple im- pressions made on the untutored senses. An ordinary fainting-fit leaves no trace behind of anything having passed during the time of deliquium. To the patient this time is a nullity of his being. It may be that the memory only is annihilated, that the mind never actually ceases in its workings ; but this view is little more than a subterfuge to meet a difficulty which we cannot otherwise encounter. Plunging thus far into the metaphysical perplexities of this question, whether the mind, or sensorial con- sciousness, is actually lost during certain times of sleep, and recovered^ as far as dreaming can be called re- covery, we are bound to notice a doctrine closely connected with this enquiry, to which the name and writings of Dr. Carpenter, Dr. Lay cock, and others have justly given authority. This is, the hypothesis of ' unconscious cerebration ' — so termed, because it sup- poses the brain capable, under certain conditions, of acts or changes, utterly without mental consciousness^ yet strictly analogous to those through which it mini- sters to mental functions — acts of intellect detached, as it were, from the intellectual personality of our being. This is a bold assumption ; but curious cases are produced which might seem to authenticate it; Such 374 MAURY ON SLEEP AXD DREAMS. are instances where some question left on the mind at bed-time unsolved, has been found in the morning thorouglily worked out. Verses — Latin as well as English — are said to have been made in the night, with no consciousness of the fact till they came to the morning memory. Nevertheless, we must regard the evidence here as insufficient, seeing how commonly such statements are careless or exaggerated ; how broken and desultory are the conditions and memories of the night ; and how likely it is that the time just antecedent to waking — ' quum somnia vera ' — may be that in which these curious feats are accomplished. The drowsiness of the evening is often as much an impediment to thought as the light sleep of the morning.^ We must, then, relegate this matter to the limbo of questions admitting neither of proof nor disproof Like many others, in addition to its intrinsic difficulties, it is encumbered and perplexed by ambiguities of language. The very term of consciousness, so essential to the dis- cussion, has hardly obtained a valid definition in its relation to sleep and dreams — an ambiguous one even in reference to our waking state. Everything, indeed, ^ If adopting this term of ^ unconscious cerebration,^ we might fairly apply it to various familiar acts of the waking state. For example: we try to recollect a name or word, fail to do so, and abandon the attempt. Soon afterwards, without intermediate consciousness or effort, the name in question rushes upon the memory, as if by a sudden inspira- tion. What has here been the intervening cerebral process ? In alluding to this common vagary of memory, we may notice ano- ther closely connected with it. A word is forgotten, and sought for in vain. But its initial letter, or some vague image of the word, hangs upon the mind, often furnishing a clue to its recovery. Such instances, trifling though they seem, serve well to illustrate the curious mechanism of this great faculty of our nature. MAURY ON SLEEP AND DREAMS. 375 that concerns personal identity — the Ego of the dif- ferent stages and states of our being — has been under the dominion of unsettled terms in all ages of philo- sophy. Words have not inaptly been called ' the counters of wise men, and the money of fools.' But even the wisest have been unwittingly governed by them in questions thus obscure or insoluble. Quitting, however, this region of hypothesis, we willingly come to the more practical part of the sub- ject—that which we learn from observation and expe- rience regarding these phenomena. Here we must again mention the liabilities to error, which occur even in the simplest form of such investigation. Besides those already noticed, we find another in the un- doubted diversity of the phenomena in different indi- viduals. The writer on sleep and dreams is not entitled to repose on his own experience only. A dozen persons would probably give as many different versions of their particular consciousness in the matter ; and it is not easy to draw averages from these fleeting shadows of the night. They change with age, and other conditions of life, moral and intellectual, which govern sleep and the dreams associated with it. The simple, but touching lines, ' Thou hast been called, Sleep, the friend of woe. But 'tis the happy who have called thee so,' point at one familiar source of this diversity, but there are many others, of which we shall speak hereafter. In prosecuting the subject, w^e must first refer again to Sleep in its general sense, as the function of 376 MAURY ON SLEEP AND DREAMS. life, destined to the restoration of those vital powers which are exhausted or impaired by the very act of living. Here we are on firmer ground. Wliatever anomalies may present themselves, it is certain that sleep fulfils, and is intended to fulfil, this great office of our nature. That which is taught us by universal experience is amply confirmed and illustrated by phy- siological inquiry. The wonderful power, to which various names have been given, but which may best, and most simply, be described as nerve-force — an ele- ment acting through the brain and nervous system in all the phenomena of sensation, of motions voluntary and reflex, and of every function essential to animal life — is now so far subjected to research, that even the velocity of its transmission through the nerves of sen- sation and voluntary motion has been approximately ascertained. This eminent discovery, and the subtle methods by which it was accomplished, warrant the hope that further research may accompHsh a similar numerical expression for the amount or quantity of the nerve-force at any given time — a matter bearing still more directly on the subject before us. If, in- deed, this were attained, it would be only formulating in figures a fact of the reality of which we are well assured. We know that the force in question, thus acting through the total nervous system of the body, is the product {secretion we may venture to call it) of a pecuhar organised tissue — that it varies in» amount in different individuals, and in the same individual at dif- ferent times — that it is exhausted, more or less, by the vital actions, bodily and mental, to which it ministers MAUEY ON SLEEP AND DREAMS. 377 — and that it can only be restored by food and sleep, each severally needed for the process of repair. This manner of viewing the nerve-power, or force, as an element to be estimated by quantihj — by excess as well as deficiency — we beheve to be not only just in itself, but denoting a principle of singular value in every part of physiology, and through physiology, in pathology and the treatment of disease. Mr. Herbert Spencer, in commenting on this subject with his wonted ability, thus expresses the main facts, in which all other writers on Sleep more or less concur : — ' Between this state (of sleep) and the waking state, the essential distinction is a great reduction of waste. The rate of waste falls so low, that the rate of repair exceeds it. It is not that during the period of activity waste goes on without repair, while during the period of inactivity repair goes on without waste, for the two always go on together. Very pos- sibly — probably even — repair is as rapid during the day as during the night. But during the day the loss is greater than the gain ; whereas during the night the gain is dimi- nished by scarcely any loss. Hence results accumulation. There is a restoration of the nerve-tissue to its state of in- tegrity.' Here, then, is a force, an agent, whether we call it material or not, generated within the body, necessary in its nature to all the functions of the body, but ex- hausted in maintaining them, and requiring periods of rest for its reproduction in adequate amount. When calling sleep ' Nature's kind restorer,' we use a poetical phrase, but express a physical fact. It is the restorer of that which is expended and lost. Its intermittent periods, its duration and degree, and even many of 378 MAURY OX SLEEP AND DREAMS. what seem its anomalies, have all reference, more or less direct, to this great function of repair — a function fulfilled, it may be, simply by suspension or modifica- tion of those actions which exhaust the nervous power, while reproduction of this force is going on — or pos- sibly by changes in the brain itself, an effect of the conditions to which it is submitted in sleep. For it must be remembered that sleep repairs not the vital functions only, but simultaneously those func- tions which we distinctively describe as mental attributes, and of which the brain is, to our present limited com- prehension, the organic instrument. The intellectual part of our nature, taking the phrase in its largest sense, is exhausted by its continued exercise, in like manner as the bodily organs, and requires the same in- termittent periods of repose and repair. If other proof were needed of the great function which sleep fulfils in the economy of life, it may at once be found in the effects which follow the privation of this repair. A single sleepless night tells its tale, even to the most careless observer. A long series of such nights, resulting, as often happens, from an over- taxed and anxious brain, may often warrant serious 'apprehension, as an index of mischief already existing, or the cause of evil at hand. Instances of this kind, we believe, are fiimiliar to the experience of every physician. But here, as in so many other cases, the evil of deficiency has its counterpart in the evil of excess. Sleep protracted beyond the need of repair, and en- croaching habitually upon the hours of waking action. MAURY OX SLEEP AXD DREAMS. 370 impairs more or less the functions of the brain, and with them all the vital powers. This observation is as old as the days of Hippocrates and Aretaeus, who severally and strongly comment upon it. The sleep of infancy, however, and that of old age, do not come under this category of excess. These are natural con- ditions, appertaining to the respective periods of life, and to be dealt with as such. In illness, moreover, all ordinary rule and measure of sleep must be put aside. Distinguishing it from Coma, there are very few cases in which it is not an unequivocal good ; and even in the comatose state, the brain, we beheve, gains more from repose than from any artificial attempts to rouse it into action. There is another point to which we must here advert, in connexion with sleep as a function of repair. This is the fact familiarly known, that the portion of life so destined is not limited to man alone, but goes far down in the scale of animal creation — possibly, or pro- bably, in one form or other, to the lowest grade and condition in animal life. Tlie sleep even of plants has become a phrase, not merely of poetic fancy, but of scientific appropriation. The curious facts regarding the hybernation of certain animals, though they have kindred with the phenomena and even theory of ordi- nary sleep, yet present anomalies which associate them in some way with the vegetable world. But the cir- cumstance of greatest interest in this matter is the capacity for dreaming^ so clearly and curiously attested in those animals which come nearest to man in the scale of being. How far that condition which can rightly be 380 MAURY ON SLEEP AND DREAMS. defined as dreaming descends in the scale, it would be impossible to say. Probably there is a gradation down- wards in the same ratio as the sensorial faculties, and vanishing with them. The fact of dreaming in the higher animals is most familiar to us in the Dog — that noble creature — ad hominum commoditates generatus, as Cicero says of him — at once a companion and solace to man, and a subject for profound thought to all who care to reflect on the great problem of our relations to the inferior animal creation. The admission of the fact does not, however, carry us beyond the presump- tion that the dreams of other animals are a vague copy of the sensations and acts of their waking lives ; with little of the intellectual part — if such it may be called — of the human dream. ' To urge in dreams the forest chase ' is the happy phrase of a poet, than whom no one better knew, or better loved, the Dog. And nothing is more likely than the fact here presumed. But seeing the difficulty of rightly remembering and expounding human dreams, there can be little chance of penetrating the mystery as presented to us in another and lower scale of being. Thus far we have been speaking of the general characters of Sleep as a function of life. In what follows we shall seek, upon our own observation and that of others, to describe the phenomena more in de- tail; associating them with those of Dreams, from which, as we have seen, they can hardly be separated, even should there be certain conditions of sleep wholly free from this kindred. MAURY OX SLEEP AND DREAMS. 381 The first step we have to make here is one essential to any successful prosecution of the inquiry. It is based on the clear recognition of the fact, that sleep, thus associated, is not one state merely, but a multiplicity and continuous succession of states ; varying at every moment in kind or degree ; graduating from the first yawn of drowsiness to the most profound sleep, and undergoing similar changes in the transition from this to the state of perfect wakefulness. Even thus simply stated, it will be seen how completely this fact governs and gives guidance to the whole enquiry, rendering its conditions, indeed, more complex, but affording a clue to many collateral phenomena otherwise wholly inex- plicable. Sir H. Holland, who has two chapters on Sleep and Dreams in his volume of ' Mental Physiology,' strongly advocates this mode of treating the subject. We avail ourselves of a short passage from one of these chapters in illustration of our meaning : — ' Sleep, then, in the most general and. correct sense of the term, must be regarded not as one single state, but a succes- sion of states in constant variation — this variation consisting, not only in the different degrees in which the same sense or faculty is submitted to it, but also in the different propor- tions in which these several powers are under its influence at the same time. We thus associate together under a common principle all the phenomena, however remote and anomalous they may seem — from the bodily acts of the somnambulist ; the vivid but inconsequent trains of thought excited by external impression ; the occasional acute exercise of the intellect ; and tlie energy of emotion — to that profound sleep in which no impressions are received from the senses, no volition is exercised, and no consciousness or memory is 382 MAUHY ON SLEEP AND DREAMS. left on waking, of the thoughts and feelings which have existed in the mind.' To this we may add, that such mode of regarding sleep brings its phenomena into closer relation with those of our waking existence, making them serve to mutual illustration, and to the solution of many anomalies whieh depend on this relation, and the manner in which the two states graduate into each other. It is impossible, indeed, for anyone at all ob- servant of the facts to regard sleep as a single or simple function. We know that through the nervous system and circulation of the blood all parts of the body, and more especially the organs of sense, are affected and altered by it. But these changes of state are ever varying in the same organ, as well as in the different organs of our complex frame ; and the inter-relations thus produced, were they more accessible to observa- tion, would give us deepest insight into this mysterious part of our nature. Every organ may be said to have a sleep of its own. The several senses, the voluntary power, the functions of the brain in their totality, are not merely affected in different degrees at different times, but are differently affected in degree at the same time. These facts are now generally recognised by physiologists. Bichat (a man of original genius, pre- maturely lost to science) thus tersely expresses them : — ' Le sommeil general est I'ensemble des sommeils par- ticuliers.' M. Maury, though less explicit in his state- ment of it, manifestly adopts the same view, which, in truth, affords theonly just definition of sleep, and its concomitant phenomena. It is the view, moreover, MAURY ON SLEEP AND DREAMS. 383 which most clearly expounds the relation of these phe- nomena to the acts and changes of the waking state — a connexion which, however perplexed to our reason by the question of personal consciousness, will be found more intimate the closer we look into it. As in the series of waking thoughts, sudden changes are often made by impressions from without, so, as regards sleep and dreams, we may presume that the breaches which occur in their continuity depend on causes external to the brain itself, though, from the nature of the case, less open to observation. The links may escape ob- servation, but we cannot hesitate in bringing these phenomena under the general law of continuity, so universal throughout nature, organic or inorganic, living or lifeless. This law, scarcely recognised in philosophy or science before the time of Leibnitz, is now receiving confirmation from every new discovery, and becoming the interpreter of endless phenomena hitherto unexplained. Leibnitz himself applies it to the question of the suspension of thinking in sleep ; deeming it impossible, on this consideration, that such entire suspension should ever really occur. We shall speak more explicitly hereafter on the physiology of sleep as regards the physical changes concerned in producing or modifying it. But there are various other facts, natural or abnormal, belonging to the physiology of this function of life, which require previous notice : some of them indeed so strangely anomalous as to have furnished food at once to sober philosophy and to the wildest dreams of credulity. We may best begin with what we may call the natural 384 MAURY OX SLEEP AXD DREAMS. conditions of sleep, while admitting that these ever tend to graduate into more abnormal phenomena. The various epithets applied to sleep — profound sleep, heavy sleep, light sleep, broken sleep, &c. — express actual realities of state ; but these so mingled with each other, so fitful in change, and so perplexed by the vagaries of dreams and disturbing causes from within and without, that even the sleeper himself is generally at fault in defining them. ' I have not slept a wink,' is often the piteous exclamation of the morning, when only some short portion of the night has been made wakeful and restless by disordered digestion, or one of those compulsory trains of thought which fasten pertinaciously on the mind, despite every effort to shake them off. But, though we cannot measure the amount of sleep by hours, or the consciousness of the sleeper, there is much real difference in its degree in relation to the great function of repair. A certain quantity of work is to be done, but it is done at very different rates. This diversity occurs in different per- sons, and in the same person at different times. One hour in one case may comprise as much of what is true sleep, as two or many hours in another ; and the only fair or probable test is to be found in the greater or less difficulty of arousing the sleeper by external action on the senses of touch and hearing. Individual temperament of body and mind, habits of life, and the immediate antecedents of sleep, are all concerned in this matter. The Duke of Wellington, in that hour of his recorded sleep on the field of Salamanca, when the two armies were closely pressing to their conflict, pro- MAURY OX SLEEP AXD DREAMS. 385 bably slept more soundly than any of the idlers of a city life at home. The ' Somnus agrestium lenis virorum' of Horace, is more powerfully expressed by Shakspeare in describing the dreamless sleep of the day-hireling, ' Who with a body fill'd and vacant mind, Grets him to rest, cramm'd with distressful bread, Sleeps in Elysium,' &c. And who can forget that noble sohloquy in the Second Part of ' Henry IV.,' where the king upbraids Sleep for deserting ' the perfumed* chambers of the great,' and giving its repose to the wet sea-boy in the midst of storms ? — ' Wilt thou upon the high and giddy mast Seal up the ship-boy's eyes and rock his brains In cradle of the rude imperious surge ? ' We might well go on through the whole of tliis won- derful passage. If forgotten by anyone, it ought promptly to be renewed to memory. We need not dwell further on a fact so famihar to common experience. But the diversity of forms which sleep assumes is more interesting to the physiologist in its relation to the particular organs and functions affected by it. We have already alluded to this topic ; one which, associated as it is with the phenomena ot dreams, offers a special mode of mental analysis as con- nected with material organisation, and may even in certain cases be made the subject of experiment. It does not, indeed, carry us farther into the mystery than a similar analysis of the waking state. But in showing how the two states commingle and graduate into one another, it serves as a fresh proof of the unity of our c c 886 MAURY ON SLEEP AND DEEAMS. nature ; and explains many of those anomalous condi- tions which seem to violate this unity, and have fur- nished food for credulity in all ages. Pursuing this analysis of the functions affected in sleep, the external senses — sight, hearing, and touch — are most obvious to famihar observation. Their sen- sibility is suspended to all ordinary impressions coming from without ; and there are degrees, even of natural sleep, so profound — davdroi Srf^ia-ra ioiKcos — that it is difficult to arouse them from it. We cannot affirm that all the senses are equally affected at the same time; though under the conditions of sound and healthy sleep it is probable that they are so. In the passage from drowsiness and somnolence into actual sleep, it is interesting to note (and to a certain point the sleeper can do this for himself) the dimness gradually over- shadowing those subtle organisations which connect us with the outer world. The condition is one so familiar that we are wont to regard these changes — if regarding them at all — rather as matter of amusement than curi- osity. To the physiologist, looking on them with more watchful eye, they become the interpreter of much that is of deep interest to his science. These natural and simpler conditions of sleep may be studied in various ways, but in no manner so effec- tually as by watching the moments of passage 2/2 ^6> sleep and the passage out of it. Each by circumstances may be rendered so sudden as to leave little scope for ob- servation. But, under ordinary conditions, the passage is gradual enough to allow those successive changes to be marked which occur both in bodily and sensorial MAURY OX SLEEP AND DREAMS. 387 functions during this transition state. Take the instance of slumber supervening on a dull book, an easy arm- chair, a warm fire, and other appliances of repose. The somnolent himself is conscious of the early changes — the apprehension becoming dull, the page before him dim or partially lost to sight, the head nodding, the book tottering in his hands. Out of this state he may be momentarily aroused by some sound or excite- ment from without, or even by the loss of that muscular instinct or balancing power^ as we may call it, which belongs to the waking state. He is startled by the book dropping from his hands, or the sudden fall of the head, but speedily lapses again into somnolency, ending in more perfect sleep. Here the consciousness of change ceases to himself; but in this gradation of state, and even in what may be deemed the soundest sleep, an observer without, if diligent in his watch, will detect many curious changes going on ; due to the influence of passing dreams, of nervous sensations from the action of the vital organs within, and even from bodily posture. These are the changes to which M. Maury's methods of observation, already mentioned, especially apply. They are abundantly furnished by those nights of broken and disordered sleep which must be counted among the ills of man, though too often only the penalty paid for his luxury or other faults of life. The most interesting part of such inspection is what may be termed the disseverment of the Will from the organs habitually acted upon by it. This is often strikingly testified during the passage from perfect sleep to the waking state. The sensibility is awakened c c 2 388 MAURY ON SLEEP AND DREAMS. before the Will, or rather we must say (for the very- word is entangled in a metaphysical web) before Voli- tion can bring the muscles into action. In the latter stage of sleep, when dreams are passing into realities of the senses, there is often an effort to speak, made distressing by the difficulty or impossibility of utter- ance. Or when under sleep in a sitting posture, the head, deprived of the controlHng muscular support, has dropped upon the chest, the attempt to raise it is often for a time painfully frustrated by the impotence of the muscles in their relation to the will. At such times volition is more awake than the instruments through which it acts. We have just mentioned the curious knowledge that may be obtained from broken or imperfect sleep. The rapidly-shifting changes and alternations of sleep and waking which then occur, can only be interpreted by regarding the two states as gliding gradually, physically and mentally, into each other — interlacing^ it might be called, from the impossibihty of drawing a definite line between them. Dante, with his wonted compression of language, finely describes this transi- tion : — ' E '1 pensamento in sogno trasmutai.' In this intermediate condition, as already remarked, and especially during the passage from drowsiness into natural sleep, these alternations may generally be noted by the sleeper himself, though, from their familiarity, little heeded or remembered. Under certain circum- stances they may even be counted as they occur. From the slumber over a book, or in a carriage, or, yet more, MAURY ON SLEEP AND DREAMS. 389 in any situation where, from necessity or decorum, a struggle has to be made against sleep, we obtain an easy estimate, sufficient to know how rapid are the fluctuations which thus affect the most important organ of our frame. . A sudden drop of the head awakens to consciousness, which is often lost again in a few seconds of time ; and such alternations, as is well known, are repeated over and over again. Anyone who has passed a dozen or twenty hours on horseback (we speak from frequent experience) must well recol- lect the effects of this hurried repetition — the loss of balance from momentary slumber, the sudden awaking in the effort to retrieve it, and the distressing efforts to prevent relapse into sleep. Without pretending to exactness in a matter thus vague and fluctuating even in the terms applied, we venture to say on observation that three or four distinct alternations of sleep and waking — that is, of consciousness lost and restored — may, and do, occur within a single minute of time. Strange and sudden as these changes in our sensorial existence may seem to be, they are yet compatible with that continuity by gradation, already indicated as the sole method of rightly interpreting the phenomena. Connected with this subject is the curious chrono- metry so often impressed upon sleep, testified by the power of awaking invariably at some one determinate horn-. The explanation of this fact must be sought for in what may be called the general chronometry of life ; in the tendency, more or less, of all vital functions to assume a periodical character, either from original constitvition, or from engendered habits acquiring the 390 MAURY OX SLEEP A]S^D DREAMS. force and persistency ot natural functions. This topic has hardly yet received all the attention it deserves as a branch of animal physiology. It might merit a trea- tise in itself. We have hitherto been speaking chiefly of what may be considered as the natural form of sleep. But there are many anomalous aspects of this great function which we are equally bound to notice — some of them depending on casual and not always obvious causes — others on artificial means used to produce sleep or those states akin to it in which there is a suspended action, more or less, of the senses connecting us with the outer world. Some of these states, which may well be called waking dreams^ are of deep interest in the mental and moral, as well as physical relations they disclose to us ; involving the intellectual faculties, and even the emotions, as well as the simple functions of the senses. Somnambulism, though we may class it among the anomalous aspects of sleep, is probably not more than an exaggerated form of phenomena of ordinary occur- rence. The retention of a certain voluntary power, while the senses are more or less wrapt up in slumber, and this unequal slumber of the senses themselves, are well known to us in the common case of talking in sleep, and other bodily motions associated with dreams. Somnambulism is doubtless always thus associated. Why in certain persons this connexion is so strikingly attested it would be hard to say ; but still it is only a gradation of state, and not a detached phenomenon. MAURY ON SLEEP A2s^D DREAMS. 391 We may further presume (and many incidents related confirm this view), that somnambuHsm chiefly occurs during the time when the cerebral functions are already partially awake — another expression of the fact upon which we have so much dwelt, that sleep is a series of states ever fluctuating in kind and degree. We may accredit the statement that the passing dreams of those so afiected are rarely remembered ; and yet reconcile this with the view we have just taken of the phenome- non. The startling aspect of somnambulism, and the rarity of its occurrence, liave given a mysterious colouring to this condition of sleep, and even made it a theme for dramatic representation, for poetry, and music. Like all other things unfamiliar to ns, it is doubtless the subject of much exaggeration in par- ticular instances. But enough remains to render it a striking exponent of these complex relations of the sensorial and other functions, in which so many of the mysteries of life have their source. In following the history of sleep and dreams w^e are perpetually passing from one marvel or mystery to another. It may seem, perhaps, that these terms do not apply to the familiar effect of opiates and other soporifics in producing sleep. But it is this familiarity which con- ceals from us the w^onder of the fact, that a mere grain or two swallowed of a particular vegetable extract should have the i)ower for a time of bringing the whole mental and bodily mechanism under its control ; or that a still more minute quantity of opium or morphia, inserted under the skin, should speedily sub- due the most acute neuralgic pain. A physical cause 392 MAURY ON SLEEP AND DEEAMS. must be concerned in all this, but no known physical law can be brought to its explanation. The only scope for speculation here is that afforded by reference to other facts more or less alike in kind. The whole class of poisons, as they are termed, may be quoted as instances of such analogy ; some of these bodies — Strychnia, Woorara, the Upas-poison, &c. — furnishing curious examples of what may be called selective power in their action on the respective organs and functions of the body. The animal poisons, again, those which give material to contagious diseases, come under the same category. In all these cases there lies the great mystery of vital organs seized upon, and life itself often extinguished, by quantities incredibly small of substances, the elements of which, combined in other proportions, are perfectly innocuous in effect. We may seek to explain these things upon the theory of fermentation, and the doctrines of atomic and mole- cular affinities, but never do we get further than to 'possibilities^ incomprehensible to our reason. Within the same field of enquiry come those anses- thetic agents of artificial creation — Ether, Chloroform, the Nitrous Oxide, &c. — which, while inducing a state of stupor, more or less profound, do, at the same time, so wonderfully annul the sensibility to pain. The records of modern surgery copiously illustrate the prac- tical value of this great discovery, which under its theoretical aspect is closely associated with the nature and phenomena of sleep. It affords another example of the manner in which these various states of the sensorium graduate into one another throughout. MAURY ON SLEEP AND DREAMS. 393 We have yet to speak here of certain other pheno- mena, in which sleep, or states akin to it, assume still more anomalous and startling forms. We allude to conditions of the sensorium, occurring in persons of a peculiar temperament, and often associated with bodily or mental disorder, which are known under the names of trance^ catalepsy^ mesmeric sleep^ &c. — names almost as vague as the aberrations they denote. These several states, and even the more familiar incidents of reverie and absence of mind, have all a certain community of character, the differences being chiefly of degree, or due to the immediate causes producing them. They all furnish examples of that disseverment, so to express it, of the sensorial functions, which leaves a portion of them awake, while others lie in a state of slumber more or less profound. What we have said, and shall further have to say, of dreams in their relations to sleep, may perhaps afford the best interpretation of many of these strange phenomena. As regards the most notable of them — Mesmeric sleep — so much has been written and argued to and fro, and the simple question, as it first stood, been turned into so many collateral channels, that we shall not seek to go beyond what is essential to our subject. Is there, we may ask, any such special form or mode of sleep as that denoted under this name — produced by a certain subtle influence, emanating from one person, and affecting, even without actual contact, the body of another ? We may say at once that neither in the sleep so produced, nor in the collateral effects assigned to it, do we find anything that has not kindred 394 MAUEY OX SLEEP AND DREAMS. with the natural phenomena of sleep and dreams, and which is not explicable by the anomalous forms these so often assume without any external influences. As regards the simple efiect in question, we believe we might as well speak of sermon sleep, of rocking-cradle sleep, of the sleep of an easy arm-chair, or of a dull book, as of Mesmeric sleep. The experiments of Mr. Braid, embodied under the name of Hypnotism, show the effects even of posture or fixed direction of vision in bringing on this state. So multiplied and various, indeed, are the conditions, bodily and mental, tending to it, that the marvel of being awake is almost as great as that of sleep produced by the manipulations and other appliances which the mesmeriser brings to his aid. Among these appliances we must especially reckon the age, sex, and personal temperament of those who are usually the subjects of these exhibitions. Anyone who cares to examine the records of them will see how important is the part these conditions play in the drama of mesmerism. Granted that the facts are strange and difficult of explanation. But so, and from the same causes, are all the ordinary phenomena of sleep and dreams. Their familiarity disguises what is equally wonderful in them. It is well worthy of note in this, as in many other questions of the kind, how much subordinate objects usurp the place of those of higher import. In the so-called mesmeric phenomena, as proffered to our belief, the mesmeriser plays a far more important part than the person acted upon. The facts presented pass into utter insignificance, vuiless it can be shown that MAURY ON SLEEP AND DREAMS. 895 they depend upon some direct emanation of power from the former. Prove that such influence actually issues from one living being, thus changing the con- dition of another in its proximity, and we have a new and wonderful element, material or spiritual, brought at once into the arena of life. It is admitted, indeed, that this mysterious power is possessed by few indi- viduals only — a limitation, if the facts be real, almost as strange as the power itself. But we may at once state our belief that no such peculiar power exists. The operator himself cannot furnish evidence of it. The effects he produces by his manipulations and other devices are closely analogous, often identical, with those to which individuals of a certain nervous tem- perament are liable from other and very different exciting causes. This, then, we apprehend to be the crucial question in all that appertains to mesmeric sleep, under its various aspects. The simple fact of sleep thus produced was known long ago ; but it was reserved for our time to erect it into a mysterious principle, altering, were it real, all our views of mental phenomena. But that it would be straying too far from our subject, we might speak here of certain bolder imposi- tions upon human credulity which have gained a recent notoriety. Connected in some points with mesmeric effects, and often admitting of similar inter- pretation, they go far beyond these in their preten- sions ; bringing us into contact and communication with the world of deceased spirits, througli the inter- vention of persons — mediums as they are called— 396 MAURY ON SLEEP AND DREAMS. gifted with the power of thus summoning spirits from the dead. We put this in the simplest terms, because the mere enunciation of it may well annul the gross pretension it involves. And when examining further into the methods employed to exhibit and attest these spiritual appearances — the puerile and pantomimic de- vices of spirit-rapping, table turning, &c., and the vulgar and ignorant talk which these revenans are made to utter, we may be content to leave such things to their own eventual refutation. Argument is of little avail with those who can lend a facile faith to these fantastic performances, rendered more suspicious by a mercenary ingredient often mixed with them. The contrivances employed vv^e cannot always explain. But exactly the same may be said of the performances of the fair-dealing professional conjurer, who puzzles and tells you that he means to do so. That some very intelligent men should have given partial credit to these illusions, is but another example of the incon- gruities which are found even in minds of the highest genius and culture. Human life abounds in such in- stances. We have thus far been speaking of Sleep in its more general characters, natural or anomalous ; con- necting it, indeed, with that wonderful adjunct of Dreaming, from which it can hardly be separated. But some distinct consideration must be given to the latter — to those fleeting shadows, the /xt/xr^/xara ^a>^s, which so strangely divide, yet Hnk together, the suc- cessive portions of our hves. In writing on this sub- MAURY ON SLEEP AXD DREAMS. 397 ject, the plural personality of an anonymous reviewer becomes somewhat inconvenient. If we have to speak of our experience, it must be understood only in an individual sense. Here, indeed, we may fairly ask our readers to become critics also ; for each and all have some experimental knowledge of their own, where- with to confirm or contradict what is set before them. But this knowledge, from causes already assigned, is generally vague and transient. The memory of the dream is speedily discarded by the waking events that follow, and dreams are often so intermingled in the same night that no effort of recollection can disentangle them. We doubt if anyone has ever attempted a suc- cessive written record of these erratic visions of our sleeping hours. If carefully and honestly executed, it would be more curious than many of those diaries of ordinary events which amuse the leisure, or innocently please the little vanities, of those who keep them. A certain number of records of dreams, coming from authentic sources, and indicating especially their rela- tions to acts or events immediately or remotely antece- dent, might justify conclusions attainable in no other way — a shadowy science, it may be admitted, yet better than none. "We have used the term honestly here, because from causes already assigned there is much proneness to exaggeration, as well as great facility for it, in the re- lation of dreams. To give completeness to a vague story is a temptation to the narrator, and it may be indulged without fear of contradiction. This tempta- tion becomes stronger where a certain superstitious 398 MAUKY ON SLEEP AND DREAMS. feeling creeps in, suggested, as we have elsewhere re- marked, by some one of the many strange coincidences of events which, casual though they be, take strong hold of the imagination. We might vivify our subject by half-a-dozen stories of such dreams ; some of them of old date, but keeping their vitality as anecdotes by the seeming mystery they involve. It is needless to say that these stories lose nothing of their marvellous character by long repetition. The original dreamers, we believe, would often be perplexed by the shapes their dreams have gradually assumed, with positive affirmation at each step of the story. A simple ques- tion will often disturb narratives of this kind. We recollect an instance where the mystery related was a dream by an officer in America of the death of a friend in India, whose death was stated to have occurred at the very hour of the dream. A dry sceptic at the table blighted the anecdote by asking if due allowance had been made for the difference of longitude of the two countries ? So few of these harmless superstitions are left to us, that the interrup- tion to the story might have been charitably spared. We have already said much of the marvel of dreams, as a portion of life alternating with the higher functions of the waking state. Contrasting the two states, it could hardly be supposed that one should be the best expounder of the other. Yet such is in reality the case. Dreams, even in their strangest in- congruities, are in no way so well interpreted as through the acts of the mind awake. The law of continuity is preserved here also, though often and MAURY ON SLEEP AND DREAMS. 399 variously infringed upon by those complex and inter- mingling relations of body and mind to which, whe- ther awake or asleep, we are unceasingly subjected. As vfefeel and recollect them in ourselves, and note them in others, dreams go through every grade of intensity and reality ; and this, probably, in a certain inverse ratio to the soundness of the sleep. We are using here terms of vague acceptation thus applied, but we possess no true vocabulary for the functions in ques- tion. What we may affirm is, that sleep in its purely physical part, and dreams in their aberrant intellectual phenomena, are ever acting upon each other, and in every degree of activity ; such mutual influence being especially testified in the acts of going to sleep and awakening from it. It is the same mysterious union which pervades and gives continuity to life, and which has excited and baffled curiosity in every age of the world. We have already discussed the question which here naturally recurs, whether there is any condition of sleep utterly devoid of dreaming? The vague and broken memories of dreams tell nothing certain as to their time or dm^ation, and without this aid we are helpless as to any sure result. But, though failing in this particular case, the memory is the faculty on which we must mainly depend for our knowledge of them, and of the enigmas they present. Aristotle, as already noticed, put the question pertinently, ' Why do we remember some dreams, others not ? ' — implying, of course, what we know by observation, that the state of dreamint? exists even when there is no after 400 MAURY OX SLEEP AND DREAMS. recollection to attest it. The question admits of being plausibly answered. The best remembered dream is that which immediately antecedes the moment of waking, when the functions suspended by sleep have partially regained their power. The dream itself, in- deed, especially if sensational in kind, is often the direct cause of the change of state ; and such dreams may occur repeatedly in the same night, each leaving its own impress on the brain. Whether there be any absolute blank in this complex series of changes is the question yet unsolved. Bearing on this point is the fact that dreams forgotten in the morning are some- times suddenly recalled by later incidents of the day. A clue once got through some casual association, the recollection often retraces these past visions of the night, which, but for such casualty, would never have been revived. We must not, however, speak of their annihilation. Dreams leave traces on the brain, the same in kind, though perhaps less forcibly marked than those im- pressed by the sensations, emotions, and volitions of the waking state. We may plausibly from this source seek explanation of those vague shadows of past events which now and then come across the mind, perplexing it wdth a sort of semi-reality, but not attested by any collateral recollection. Most of our readers have pro- bably experienced this curious wandering of the mind amidst what we believe to be the shades of old dateless dreams, called suddenly into life, and as suddenly flit- ting away. If this be, as we suppose, an act of Memory reviving ancient dreams, it is but one of the endless w^onders of this great faculty of our nature, the MAURr ox SLEEP AXD DREAMS. 401 study of which, under its many anomalies — in health and disease, in its sleeping as well as waging moods — carries us further into the mystA'y of the mind itself than we can reach by any other approach. That there is a certain material mechanism of memory, an or- ganisation upon which impressions are made and re- tained, the facts compel us to beUeve. Whether we shall ever acquire a more intimate knowledge of its nature is very doubtful. The minute anatomy of the human brain and its appendages, while disclosing much that is curious in structure and in relation to the senses and vital organs, has failed to detect any apparatus of memory, or those conditions which make recollection an act of the human will. Ignorant here, we are still able to affirm that the memory and the recollection (fij/T/jfjur), dvdiJbvr](TLs ; the faculty and the act) are strictly analogous in their ap- plication to the visions of the niglit as to the events of the day. In each case the recollection works its back- ward way through the successive antecedent states of the sensorium ; guided by the same associations, and stopped by the same impediments. Anyone caring to examine his own consciousness on the subject will see how similar the process is in kind, though, as regards the dream, rendered more partial and perplexing by the other conditions of sleep. But we may carry this analogy on to another point. Many anecdotes are familiar to us, and these sanctioned by individual observation, showing how much and what variety of thought, emotion, and event may be comprised in a dream of the briefest duration. The D D 402 MAURY ON SLEEP AND DREAMS. chronology of the night is generally an obscure one ; but this particular fact is easily tested, especially in the broken dreams of the morning hours. It proves that the period of a few minutes may include a whole story of incidents, in which the perceptions of place, time, and persons are removed from the outer world into those of the little world within. This may seem strange to the unobservant of themselves, but it will not so seem to any who are capable of examining with care the sequence of their waking thoughts. We live, the mind lives, in a constant series or succession of states, each one having its own individuality and excluding others, yet linked together by a mechanism which we vainly seek to interpret. ^ No one without close exami- nation can conceive the multitude of these sequent states which may be, and actually are, crowded into short spaces of time — ever liable, indeed, to be inter- rupted by causes from without and within, and merging into new series, which in their continuous succession form the totality of our mental life. Of the internal causes acting on these series, the Will is that most im- portant — often, indeed, a slave to vagrant habits of thought, but capable of becoming their master. The highest faculty of man, intellectual and moral, lies in the power of controlling and guiding them in their passage through the mind ; so directing them as to en- noble the character of thought itself, and the acts derived from it. Without pursuing this subject, instructive though it be as a method of mental analysis, we proceed to ano- ther chapter in the History of Dreams, embodied in MAURY ON SLEEP AND DREAMS. 403 the question, What are the materials of these visions of our sleep ? Of what ' stuff are dreams made ? ' The first and natural comment upon the question is, that dreams, like waking thoughts, must be different in dif- ferent minds, and with some exphcit reference to their individuality. Such is doubtless the case, and among classes of men as well as individuals. We have already alluded to this curious inquiry, one admitting of the strongest presumption, if not of direct proof. Passing by the dreams of infant life, as inaccessible to observa- tion, can we suppose those of the idle schoolboy to be moulded like the dreams of a man immersed in worldly care and anxieties? or like those of old age wandering vaguely over the memories and feelings of past hfe ? How are we to compare the dreams of the day-labourer in the field, the factory, or the mine, with those of men whose faculties have been exercised and exalted by literature, science, and the arts; or by the political struggles which enter into the government of the world .^ The sleeping minds of Bacon and Newton, of Dante, Shakspeare, and Mil- ton, of Michel Angelo and Eaphael, of Julius Csesar and Napoleon, must have been tenanted with visions very different from those of ordinary men. Who, again, can tell us what are the dreams of madness in its many forms, some of these forms having close kindred physiologically with the act of dreaming? The dreams of the idiot may resemble those of early childhood, or the second childhood of old age. What shall we conjecture as to those of the man who has undergone years of solitary confinement, changeless in D D 2 404 MAURY ON SLEEP AND DREAMS. sensations and events ? Such questions miglit be vari- ously multiplied. They tell us how much we have to learn, and the difficulty of learning it. Hardly can we reduce into shape the fleeting memories of our own dreams. Harder still is it to authenticate those of others, especially of classes of mankind little prone to take account either of their sleeping or waking existence. A word more here as to the relative rapidity with which the successive images and thoughts of dreams pass through the mind. The analogies we have been pursuing may again give an answer. Though we can- not bring numbers into the question, we have every reason to beheve that the succession of mental acts, while awake, is habitually more rapid in some minds than others, and even in the same mind at different times. We think more rapidly^ as well as inore vividly in one state of the sensorium than in another. If this be so, we may fairly presume the same as to the con- ditions of dreaming in different minds. But we cannot go beyond this presumption. Eeverting to the question before us, what are the materials out of which dreams are formed ? The ob- vious and sole answer is — from the sensations, ideas, emotions, acts, and events of antecedent life. Putting aside all notions, ancient or modern, of supernatural intervention, the phenomena of waking existence are those alone to which we can look for their interpreta- tion. The passage of Cicero, quoted below, while well expressing this fact, denotes also those strange perturba- tions, which form the distinctive character of dreams MAUEY ON SLEEP AND DEEAMS. 405 and the great mystery of their nature.^ We can under- stand (or fancy we understand) the memories of past images or events impressed upon the brain. But the manner of their grouping in the mind during sleep is the marvel with which we are here concerned. Loosened from all fetters of time and place, and freed from control of the will, the dream makes a little world of its own, bringing into strangely broken suc- cession scenes which have no counterpart in actual life; conjunctions of persons, places, time, and incidents, which never did or could have occurred in such combi- nation. The complete dream disregards all realities. It brings the dead back among the living without sur- prise to the dreamer, and embodies them in the en- tangled stories which have no recollected beginning or end ; which run abruptly into one another ; confuse personal identities ; and blend impossibilities with the most common incidents of life. Shakspeare has well called dreams, ' the children of an idle brain.' That power in fact is dormant which gives sequence and con- gruity to the acts of the waking mind. But still, even here, analogies press closely upon us. The images of sensible objects occurring in dreams would seem to be closely akin to those which the memory furnishes to the mind awake, either by effort of will or by mere automatic connexions of thought. In this case, as in the other, they are vague and fleeting. No effort of will can long detain them before the waking consciousness ; and in dreams, unaided by will, they * ' Animus incidit in visa varia et incerta, ex reliquiis inhserentibus earum rerum quas vigilans gesserit aut cogitavit ; quarum perturbatione mirabiles interdum existunt species somniorum.' 406 MAURY OX SLEEP AND DREAMS. are still more transient and disjointed. In both cases objects of vision minister chiefly to this subjective action, while the waking mind can create by will, or receive unbidden, a sensorial memory of rhythmical sounds, clothing itself often in actual melodies, the reflex music of the brain. This latter point, in its various physiolo- gical connexions, has scarcely had its due share of attention. Eegarding, then, the images of dreams, however perturbed in order, as derived from those of daily life, we still have to ask the question, whether this mimic imagery ever goes beyond, with inventions new to the senses ? We think not. We may dream of the Centaurs or the winged Assyrian bulls, as we have seen them in the British Museum, but we do not in our sleep create monstrosities of this kind. Under the most fantastic grouping of persons and incidents, the individual images are not unnatural or distorted. We beheve this to be so ; but here, as often elsewhere on this subject, we must ask our readers to consult their own ex- perience. That dreams, however, are generally formed out of unwonted or impossible combinations of events, and that they undergo sudden and fantastic changes as regards persons, times, and localities, are facts familiar to all. These three sources of disorder are, indeed, mainly concerned in the illusions of the night. The personages of the dream appear and disappear, shift, and interchange their acts and positions with magical rapidity. The realities of time and place are lost in the medley of incidents of which the vision is composed. MAURY ON SLEEP AND DREAMS. 407 One dream passes into another, as far as consciousness and memory can inform us, without continuity or con- nexion. This description, however, needs to be quah- fied in more than one respect. We have already remarked that the act of dreaming is varied by the greater or less completeness of the conditions which constitute sleep. As the time of awakening approaches these conditions change ; the sensorial powers are partially revived, and the dreams, though still perhaps erratic in the points just mentioned, are more consecu- tive and consistent in the events they include. ' We may repeat our belief that to this fact we must look for explanation of those singular stories of problems solved, verses composed, and arguments logically pursued during the hours of sleep. Again, as respects the erratic character of dreams, analogy is not wanting for its illustration. The mind awake, or nominally so, often wanders almost as strangely. Let anyone, even when thoroughly awake and under ordinary circumstances, seek to retrace the successive thoughts or mental acts of the antecedent half-hour. Unless the mind be engaged on some single and definite object, he will find the task difficult and laborious ; and if partially successful in tracking backwards these sequent states, the chance is that they will be found variously broken and divergent, in effect of impressions from without or of internal conditions of the brain and other organs. Though we are all living in this unceasing series of mental changes, few take note of them, or mark how rapid and abrupt they often are even in the calmest moods of mind. 408 MAURY ON SLEEP AND DREAMS. All such aberrations are repeated and exaggerated in dreams. The brain, physically affected in sleep, loses more or less those perceptions of time, place, and per- sonality which are wont to guide the succession of mental acts. In the varying degrees of this influence we may best find explanation of many of the anomalies of somnambulism, trance, hypnotism, hysteria, &c., of which we have already spoken. Here, however, as in many questions of like kind, the explanation merely removes one difficulty to bring us in contact with others yet more insuperable. It has been a question how far the course and objects of dreams can be changed by external stimuli applied to the several senses of the dreamer. Such excitements, it is well known, may be applied as to modify variously the conditions of sleep without ac- tually suspending it. The cradle of the sleeping child affords sufficient evidence of the fact. Shakspeare had this matter in his ever-pregnant mind when he brings in Queen Mab as a fairy experimentalist upon dreams. But graver experiments have been made on the sub- ject — some of them due to M. Maury himself. Though we cannot doubt the reality of such influence in dif- ferent modes and degrees, seeing what we gather both from analogy and observation, yet are the particular proofs of difficult attainment, and experiments need to be often repeated and varied to give them their ap- propriate value. We have more certainty as to the influence of the internal organs on the course and character of dreams. The digestive organs more espe- cially — disordered, it may be, by the dinner of the pre- MAURY ON SLEEP AKD DREAMS. 409 ceding day — betoken the hestema vitia by troublous sensations and troubled dreams. Few so prudent as not to have had experience of nights thus disturbed. The nightmare is familiar as one example ; but the par- ticular effects are as numerous as the disorders producing them. The sensations arising from the excretory organs mingle themselves variously also with the incidents of dreams. Even posture, temperature, a hard or soft bed, have effect in modifying them, by altering the conditions of the sleep with which they are associated. Such influences cannot be doubted, difficult though it is to bring the facts into strict evidence. Dream-land is not the land of logic or close scientific induction. Though less practically important, there is a deeper interest in tracing the connexion of dreams with the events of prior life, whether immediately or remotely antecedent. It may perhaps be affirmed that even in the most entangled series of incidents haunting the brain of the dreamer, there is always interwoven something of his own individuality, present or past. We have elsewhere spoken of the influence of personal temperament and habits of life on the character of dreams. Lucretius in some fine lines describes this, as does Chaucer in a striking passage of good old English verse. To the inimitable Queen Mab of Shakspeare we have just referred. But apart from all authority in verse or prose, we know from unequivocal experience how faithfully particular traits of character, emotions, passions, and personal propensities are portrayed in the dream. The feeUngs thus reffected from our 410 MAURY ON SLEEP AND DREAMS. waking lives, if sometimes pleasant, are often harass- ing and painful ; rendered so in part by the physical conditions of sleep, and the impotence of the will in regard to bodily functions. There is the feeling of something to be done which we cannot do — of en- tanglement in difficulties which we cannot throw off — the hurried pursuit of some object which we cannot reach — the effort to speak without the power of utter- ance — dreams which often awaken the sleeper, and from which, especially where painful memories are in- volved, it is happiness to be awakened. In young children, however, who do not so readily dissever the real from the unreal, the images and agitation of a fearful dream often continue for an hour or two after sleep has come to an end. It is a saying of Sir Thomas Brown, 'Virtuous thoughts of the day lay up good treasures for the night. Men act in sleep in some conformity to their awakened senses. Dreams intimately tell us of ourselves.' We remember to have read a sermon — and a very able one — inculcating the examination of dreams, as a means of recognising and rebuking our faults. They do in truth often denote not merely the grave, but also those lighter shades of character which are lost to our consciousness in the current and familiar events of the day. We doubt whether the sense of personal identity is ever absent in dreaming, though some writers have supposed it to be so. Language here is incompetent to express things which even thought fails to compre- hend. But w^e may perhaps affirm that the conscious- MAURY OX SLEEP AND DUEAMS. 411 ness applied to these visionary events, however strange and incongruous their nature, is in essence the same as that which underhes our waking existence. To pursue the matter further would be merely to clothe poverty of knowledge with a garment of words. The events immediately preceding dreams might naturally be expected to minister materials to them more largely than those of distant date. And such may probably be the case, especially when mental emotions are mingled with these events. But we may well marvel at the remoteness of those scenes of past life to which our retrospective dreams often extend. Incidents are repeated, and personalities restored, now never present to the waking thoughts of the dreamer, and which might seem wholly effaced from memory. Here again, as so often before, we come to analogy as the best mode of illustrating, if not explaining, these mysteries, and of bringing them into accordance with the unity and identity of our being. The memories of past life embodied in dreams have close kindred w^ith those evoked by incidents, often very slight, of our waking hours. We know nothing of the actual nature of the impressions or images thus latent in the brain ; but there they are — dormant, it may be, for ever, yet capable of being revivified at any time, sleeping or waking, by coming into sudden relation with present sensations, emotions, or thoughts. In sleep these dis- tant memories are usually vague and dateless — when awake they receive correction from the senses and other faculties. Their origin, however, is the same ; and the further we press such examination the more 412 MAURY OX SLEEP AND DREAMS. intimate will be found the relations and resemblances disclosed. We have spoken already of those pale spectra of former dreams, as we may best deem them, which now and then flit across the memory, strangely mingling with passing events. Another phenomenon akin to this is the curious hold on the brain which certain dreams seem to acquire ; shown by their frequent recurrence, with the same general incidents and feelings, yet with- out any actual reality of origin. Every observer of himself may here have his own particular tale to tell ; but the general fact will probably be recognised. We know an instance where six such dreams, frequently but irregularly recurrent, and this during a period of very many years, are well attested by close observation of the person who is the subject of them. We may presume, though we cannot prove, that the peculiar grasp of these visions on the sleeping mind — the ' dreams of dreams,' we may call them — depends on the force of the impressions in which they originated — strengthened, it may be, by repetition. In all our reasonings on these obscure points we are forced to recur to the conception just stated of actual material changes — utterly incomprehensible in their nature — made and infixed on the brain, and probably most forcibly impressed at those times of life when the mental faculties are in greatest vigour. Admitting the latter fact, it explains to us several seeming ano- malies of memory ; such as the frequent and vivid recollections in advanced age of the events of earlier life, while those] of recent occurrence vanish speedily MAURY ON SLEEP AND DREAMS. 413 from the mind ; and as regards dreams, the similar wandering of the brain among past memories, when present sensations are dimmed by age, and hfe itself is beginning to assume the character of a dream. One point remains to be noticed, of which, however, notwithstanding its deep interest to mental physiology, we shall only briefly speak. This is the relation of sleep and dreams to those abnormal or diseased states of mind which we call insanity — though, indeed, a single term feebly expresses the multiform shapes of such disorders which observation unhappily brings before us. A manifest distinction offers itself here in the out- set. The one condition is natural, and periodical only — the other is abnormal, and more or less permanent. But, nevertheless, there are certain links connecting them which cannot be overlooked — relations noticed by Cicero and other ancient writers, and more explicitly described by several eminent authors of our own time.^ Many of the strange hallucinations of insanity, though less changeful and fleeting than those of the dream, yet have various characters in common with the latter. Such especially are those where the mind may be con- sidered wholly in a subjective state — the brain coining images, ideas, and associations within itself, uncorrected by the senses, or by any clear memories of the past. The singular phenomena of spectral illusions^ in which the sense of hearing also is concerned, furnish a striking ^ * Quod si ita paratum esset, ut ea dormientes agerent, quae somiiia- rent, alligandi omnes essent, qui cubituni irent.' (Cicero De Divinatione, lib. ii. 59.) In the valuable work on the ' Physiology and Pathology of the Mind,' by Dr. Maudsley, will be found much that relates to this interesting topic. 414 MAURY ON SLEEP AND DREAMS. example of this connexion. Images of objects which have no reahty, voices equally imaginary, haunt the brain of the madman as they do that of the dreamer — less urgently, indeed, in the latter case, and with power- lessness as to any consequent action, yet still marking a state of the sensorium common to both conditions. We might dwell further on this subject, and its curious relations to the phenomena of ecstacy, hysteria, the delirium of fever and drunkenness. But even if not admonished by want of space, we should be taxing the patience of our readers too severely by detaining them longer in this region of shadows, where realities and mockeries are so strangely intermingled, and where mental and bodily states mutually excite, control, or partially annul one another, leaving a long page of problems to be solved, if such solution be ever possible. The only topic now remaining to us is that of the physical causes proximately concerned in producing sleep and dreams. Here, again, notwithstanding re- searches recently directed to this part of physiology, and valuable works describing them, we are still forced upon the admission of diversity of opinion and imper- fect knowledge. These researches have chiefly regarded the influence of the circulation upon the functions of the brain, and upon sleep, as one of the most important of them. This varying influence is recognised in every part of the body, and at every minute of life ; but the cerebral circulation has specialities distinguishing it from that of any other organ. The confinement of the brain within the close cavity of the cranium, and the MAURY ON SLEEP AND DREAMS. 415 peculiar distribution of the arterial and venous system in the medullary and cineritious substance, in the membranes and sinuses of this organ, have embarrassed hitherto every question on the subject. It has been the most general opinion of physiologists that a certain amount of pressure on the brain, chiefly from conges- tion of venous blood, was necessary for the state of sleep. More recently, this opinion has been modified, if not contradicted, by the experiments of Mr. Durham, Dr. Hammond, and others ; furnishing evidence that sleep depends on a lessened quantity and force of blood in the brain, and especially in the arterial part of the cerebral circulation. Though this inference is fortified by various known facts, such as the sleep produced by exposure to intense cold, by loss of blood, by pain, and other causes of vital exhaustion, it still leaves the phy- sical theory an ambiguous one ; embarrassed by our ignorance of the relative proportions of arterial and venous blood during sleep — by questions as to the mode of action of the vascular portion of the brain upon the medullary and other cerebral tissues — and by a further question, of higher interest but harder of solution, viz., the nature of those changes in the cere- bral substance itself through which dreams, and other concomitant phenomena of sleep, have their origin. The latter question involves difficulties which, with all just regard to the prowess and high attainments of modern science, we must yet believe to be insuperable. It is in truth the selfsame problem as that put before us by the normal and waking state of our sensorial existence. The dream of the night is connected with 416 MAURY OX SLEEP AND DREAMS. the same organisation which ministers to the sen- sorial functions of the day. Through the microscope and other means much has been discovered of the minute anatomy of the brain and its appendages. Medullary cells and fibres, ganglionic centres, and new nervous intercommunications have been disclosed ; and though less assuredly, certain functions localised as regards the parts of the brain fulfilling them. But of the infinitesimal motions and changes in the nervous substance itself, we are as entirely ignorant as we are of that mystery which associates these changes in invisible mechanisms with the intellectual and spiritual part of our nature — with the sensations, thoughts, memories, and emotions, which in their succession and combinations constitute the mental being of man. We must not indeed vaunt our knowledge of the brain until all dispute is settled as to the functions of the Cerebellum — one of the most prominent parts of the cerebral system, and unquestionably fulfilling functions essential to the integrity of the whole. What, however, we are mainly concerned with here is the fact that actions analogous in kind, though variously altered in operation, occur alike in the sleep- ing and waking brain. In reasoning upon the physical causes of these phenomena, we do not reach our end in merely proving the influence of changes in the cerebral circulation and of varying pressure thus pro- duced. We advance a step, but only one step, by this demonstration; leaving it unsettled whether the ex- haustion of nerve force, the primary cause of sleep, is not also the immediate cause of these very changes in MAURY OX SLEEP AND DREAMS. 417 the vascular system of the brain. The many cases where sleep, or states closely akin to it, can be pro- duced by causes in which the circulation is little, if indeed at all, concerned, but where the nervous system is directly and powerfully acted upon, suffice to show how important is the influence of the latter in con- nexion with these complex and ever-changing pheDO- mena. A treatise on Sleep and Dreams, to be complete, should comprise also the pathology of these states, and the remedies — useful or useless — which have been sug- gested to remove ' or relieve the disorders affecting them. These topics, however, belong rather to profes- sional works, and we cannot here do more than refer to them, important though they are to the physiologist as well as to the physician. It has been our object in the foregoing article, which we now bring to a close, to place before our readers simply and clearly what we may best call the Natural History of Sleep and Dreams. While avoiding as far as possible all technical language and the metaphysical subtleties into which such ques- tions are prone to pass, we have sought to inculcate larger and more distinct conceptions of these great functions of our inner life, the very familiarity of which obscures them to our contemplation. And at the same time we have endeavoured, by pointing out the close relations and analogies of the phenomena to those of our waking existence, to establish here, also, that con- tinuity and identity of Being, upon which these pheno- mena on first view seem so strangely to infringe. SpoUisuoo'le «t Co., Printers, A'ew-streel Square, London. E E BIOGRAPHICAL WORKS EECOLLECTIOIS^S of PAST LIFE. By Sir Henry Holland, Bart. M.D. F.R.S, Third Edition. Post 870. lOs. 6d, ' LIFE and COEEESPONDENCE of EICHAED WHATELY, D.D. late Archbishop of Dublin. By E. Jane Whately. Crown 8vo. with Portrait, price 10s, BIOGRAPHICAL and CEITICAL ESSAYS, reprinted from Reviews, with Additions and Corrections. By A. Hatward, Q.C. Second Series, 2 vols. Svo. 285. Third Series, 1 vol. 8vo. 14«. LIFE of the DUKE of WELLINGTON. By the Eev. Gr. R. Glfjg, M.A. Popular Edition, crown 8vo. with Portrait, 55. MEMOIES of SIR HENRY HAVELOCK, K.C.B. By John Clark Marshman. People's Edition. Crown Svo. 3s. 6d. The LIFE and LETTEES of the EEV. SYDNEY SMITH. Edited by his Daughter, Lady Holland, and Mrs. Austin. Crown 8vo. 25. 6d. sewed : 3s. 6d. cloth. ESSAYS in ECCLESIASTICAL BIOGEAPHY. By the Right Hon. Sir J. Stephen, LL.D. Cabinet Edition. Crown 8vo. 7s. Qd. MEMOIE of GEOEGE EDWAED LYNCH COTTON, D.D. Bisliop of Calcutta ; with Selections from his Journals and Correspondence. Edited by Mrs. Cotton. Second Edition. Crown 8vo. 7s. Qd. LOED GEOEGE BENTHSTCK ; a Political Biography. By the Right Hon. B. Disraeli, M.P. Eighth Edition. Crown 8vo. 6s. The LIFE of LLOYD FIEST LOED KENYON. By Hon. G. T. Kenyon, M.A. With Portraits. Svo. 14s. Biographical Works, MEMOIR of THOMAS FIRST LORD DENMAN, formerly Lord Chief Justice of England. By Sir Joseph Arxould, B.A. K.B. With two Portraits. 2 vols. 8vo, 32s. The LIFE of ISAMBARD KINGDOM BRUNEL, CI\T:L ENGINEER. By I. Buunel, B.C.L. With Portrait, Plates, and Woodcuts. 8vo. 21 5. ISAAC CASAUBON, 1559-1614. By Mark Pattisox, Rector of Lincoln College, Oxford. 8\'o. [In tJie press. LIFE of ALEXANDER von HUMBOLDT. Edited by Kaul BfiUHNs, and translated by Jane and Caroline Lassell. With 3 Por- traits. 2 vols. Svo. ZQs. LIFE and LETTERS of GILBERT ELLIOT, FIRST EARL of MINTO, from 1751 to 1806, when his Public Life in Europe was closed by liis Appointment to the Vice-Royalty of India. Edited by the Countess of MiNTo. 3 vols, post 8vo. 31s. 6d. AUTOBIOGRAPHY. By Johx Stuart Mill. Svo. 7^. QcL LEADERS of PUBLIC OPINION in IRELAND ; Swift, Flood, Grattan, OConnell. By W. E. H. Lecky, M.A. Crown Svo. 75. 6d. The RISE of GREAT FAMILIES ; otlier Essays and Stories. By Sir Bernard Burke, C.B. LL.D. Crown Svo. 12s. 6d. VICISSITUDES of FAMILIES. By Sir Berxard Burke, C.B. LL.D. Crown Svo. 125. Gd. FELIX MENDELSSOHN'S LETTERS from ITALY and SWITZERLAND, and LETTERS from 1833 to 1817. Translated by Lady Wallace. With Portrait. 2 vols, crown Svo. 55. each. DICTIONARY of GENERAL BIOGRAPHY ; containing Concise Memoirs and Notices of the most Eminent Persons of all Countries, from the Earliest Ages to the Present Time. Edited by W. L. R. Cates. ^^o. -lis. London, LONGMANS & CO. 39 Paternoster Row, E.G. London, Ncrjember 1874. GENERAL LIST OF WORKS PUBLISHED BY Messrs. Longmans, Green, and Co. PAGE I Arts, Manufactures, &c. ... 25 Astronomy & Meteorology . . 17 Biographical Works 6 Chemistry & Physiology ... 23 Dictionaries & other Books of Reference 14 Fine Arts & Illustrated Edi- tions 24 History, Politics, Historical Memoirs, &c i Index 41 to 44 Knowledge for the Young . . . 40 PAGB Mental & Political Philosophy 8 Miscellaneous & Critical Works 12 Natural History & Physical Science 18 Poetry & the Drama. ... . 35 Religious & Moral Works . . 28 Rural Sports, Horse & Cattle Management, &c 36 Travels, Voyages, &c 32 Works of Fiction 34 Works of Utility & General Information • . . 3&. •-^>o5«ic HISTORY, POLITICS, HISTORICAL. MEMOIRS, &c. Journal of the Reigns of King George IV. and King William IV. By the late Charles C. F. Greville, Esq. Clerk of the Conncil to those Sovereigns. Edited by Hen7y Reeve, Registrar of the Privy Coicncil. 3 vols. Sz'o. pj'ice l^s. The Life of Napoleon I If. derived from State Records,. Unptcblished Family Cor- respondence, and Personar Testimony. By Blanchard ferrold, Foicr Vols. %vo. luith Portraits from the Originals in possession of the ImperiaS Family, and Facsimiles of Letters of Napoleon I. N^apoleon III. Queen Hortense, vo. [Nearly ready. IntrodMctory Lectures on Modern History delivered hi Lent Term 1842 ; with the Inaugural Lecture de- livered in December 1 84 1 . By the late Rev, Thomas Arnold, D.D. %vo, price *js. 6d. Essays on the English Government and Constitu- tion from the Reign of He7iry VI L to the Present Time. By John Earl Russell Fcp. %vo. 3J-. dd. On Parliamentary Go- vernment in England: its Origin, Development, and Practical Operation. By Alpheus Todd. 2 vols. Svo. £1. ijs. The Constitutional His- tory of England since the Accession of George III. 1 760-1870. By Sir Thomas Erskine May, K.CB. Fourth Edition. 3 vols, croivii %vo. \%s. Democracy in Europe; a History. By Sir Thomas Erskine May, K.CB. 2 vols. Svo. [/;/ preparation. The History of England from the Fall of Wolsey to the Defeat of the Spanish Armada. By J. A. Froude, M.A . Cabinet Edition, i2vols. cr.Zvo. £T). 12s, Library Edition, 12 vols. Svo. £S. i8s. The English in Ireland in the Eighteenth Century. By y. A. Frotide, M.A. 3 vols. Svo. £2. Ss. Estimates of the English Kings from William the Conqueror to George III. By y . L. Sanford. Crown Svo. 12s. 6d. The History of England from the Accession of fames II. By Lord Macaulay. Student's Edition, 2 vols. cr. Svo. \2s. People's Edition, 4 vols. cr. Svo. ids. Cabinet Edition, 8 vols, post Svo. \Ss. Library Edition, 5 vols. Svo. £/if. Critical and Historical Essays contributed to the Edinburgh Review. By the Right Hon. Lord Macaulay. Cheap Edition, authorised and complete, crown Svo. y. 6d. Student's Edition, crown Svo. 6s. People's Edition, 2 vols, crown Svo. Ss. Cabinet Edition, 4 vols. 24s. Library Edition, 3 vols. Svo. 36^-. Lord Macaulay s Works, Co7nplete and tC7iiform Li- brary Edition. Edited by his Sister, Lady Trevelyan. 8 vols. Svo. with Portrait, £^. ^s. NEW WORKS PUBLISHED BY LONGMANS & GO. Lechives on the History of England from the Ear- liest Times to the Death of King Edward II. By W. Longma}i, F.A.S. MaJ)s and Illustrations. Svo. i^s. The History of the Life aftd Times of Edward III. By W. Longman, F.A.S. With 9 Maps, 8 Plates, and i6 Woodcuts. 2 vols. Svo. 2 8 J. History of England imder the Duke of Bucking- ham and Charles the First, 1624-1628. By S. Rawson Gardiner, late Student of Ch, Ch. 2 vols. Svo. [In the press. H istory of Civilization in England and France, Spain and Scotland, By Henry Thomas Buckle. 3 vols, crown Svo. 24J. A Student's Manual of the History of India from the Earliest Period to the Present. By Col. Meadows Taylor, M.R.A.S. Second Thousand. Cr. Svo. Maps, 'js. 6d. The French Revolution and First Empire; an Historical Sketch. By W. O'Connor Morris, sometime Scholar of Oriel College, Oxford. With 2 Maps. Post Svo. p. 6d. • The History of India from the Earliest Period to the close of Lord Dal- housies A dmin istration. By fohn Clark Mar shman. 3 wis. crown Svo. 22s. 6d. Indian Polity; a View of the System of Administra- tion in India. By Lieut. -Colonel George Chesney. Second Edition, revised, with Map. Svo. 2\s. Waterloo Lectures ; a Study of the Campaign of 1815. By Colonel Charles C Chesney, R.E. Third Edition. Svo. with Map, los. 6d. Essays in Modern Mili- tary Biography. By Colonel Charles C Chesney, R.E, Svo. \2s. 6d. The Imperial and Colo- nial Constitutions of the Britannic Empire, includ- ing Indian Institutions. By Sir E. Creasy, M.A. With 6 Maps. Svo. \<^s. The Oxford Reformers — John Colet, Erasmus, and Thomas More; being a History of their Fellow- Work. By Frederic Seebohm, Second Edition. Svo. 14^. NEW WORKS PUBLISHED BY LONGMANS & CO. The History of Persia and its present Political Sittcation ; with Abst^^acts of all Treaties and Con- ventions between Persia and p7tgland. By Clements R. Markhamy C,B. KR.S, Zvo. with Map, 2ls. The Mythology of the Aryan Nations, By Geo, W, Cox, M,A, late Scholar of Trinity Col- lege, Oxford. 2 vols. 2>vo. 28j-. A History of Greece. By the Rev, Geo, W, Cox, M.A, late Scholar of Trinity College, Oxford, Vols. I. and IT. Svo. Maps, 36^-. The History of Greece. By C. Thirlwall, D.D. late Bp. of St. David's, 8 vols. fcp. Svo. 2Ss. The Tale of the Great Persian War, from the Histories of Hej^odotzcs. By Rev. G. W. Cox, M.A. Fcp. Svo. y. 6cl. The History of the Pelo- ponnesian War, by Thtc- cydides. Translated by Richd. Craw- ley, Fellow of Worcester College, Oxford. Svo. 21S. Greek History from The- inistocles to Alexander, in a Series of Lives from Plutarch. Revised and arranged by A. H. Clotcgh. Fcp. Svo. Woodcziis, 6s. History of the Romans tender the Ernpire. . By the Veiy. Rev. Charles Merivalcy D.C.L. Dean of Ely. 8 vols, post Svo. \Ss. The Fall of the Roinaii Republic ; a Short History of the Last Century of the Common wealth. By Dean Merivale, D.C.L. \2mo. 7 J. del. The Sixth Oriental Mo- narchy ; or the Geogi^aphy, Histo7y, and Antiquities of Parthia. Collected and Illustrated fro7n Ancient aftd Mode7^n sources. By Geo. Rawlinson, M.A. With JMaps and Illustrations. %vo. \^s. f The Seventh Great Ori- ental Monarchy ; or, a History of the Sassanians : with Notices Geographical a7zd A7ttiquaria7i. By Geo. Rawli7iso7i, M.A, Svo. with Maps and Illustrations. \In the press A NEW V/ORKS PUBLISHED BY LONGMANS & CO. Eiicyclopcedia of Chro- nology, Historical mid Biographical ; comprisifig the Dates of all the Great Eveiits of History, i7iclud- ing Treaties, Allia^ices, Wars, Battles, &c. Inci- dents in the Lives of Enii- 7ient Men, Scie^itific and Geog7^aphical Discoveries, Mecha7iical Inventiofis, and Social, Domestic, and Eco- nomical Improvements. By B, B. Woodward, B.A. and W. L, R, Gates, 2>vo. 42J. The History of Rome. By Wilhelm Ihne. Vols. I. and II. ^vo. 2ps. Vols. III. and IV. in preparation. History of Etiropemt Morals from Atcgtisttcs to Gharlemagne. By W. E. H. Lecky, 31. A. 2 vols. 2>vo. 2 8 J. History of the Rise and Influefice of the Spirit of Rationalism in Enrope. ByW.E.H.Lecky,M.A. CabtJiet Editioji, 2 vols, crown Svo. i6s. History of the Early Ghtcrch from the First Preaching of the Gospel to the Council of Niccea, a.d. 325. By Miss E. M. Sewell. Fcp. 8w. \s. 6d. Introduction to the Science of Religion : Four Lectures delivered at the Royal Institution ; with tzvo Essays on False Ana- logies and the Philosophy of Mythology. By F. Max Muller, M.A, Crown Svo. los. 6d. The Stoics, Epicttreans, and Sceptics. Translated from the Ger- 77ian of Dr. E. Zeller, by Oswald J. Reichel, M.A. Crown Zvo. 14!-. Socrates and the Socratic Schools. Translated from the Ger- 7nan of Dr. E. Zeller, by the Rev. O. J . Reichel, M.A. Crown Svo. Ss. 6d. The History of Philoso- phy, from T hales to Comte. By George Henry Lewes. Fourth Edition^ 2 vols. Svo. 32^. Sketch of the History of the Church of England to the Revohition ^1688. By the Right Rev. T V. Shorty D.D. Bishop of St. Asaph. Eighth Edition. Crown Svo. 'js. 6d. The Historical Geogra- phy of Europe. By E. A. Freeman^ D.C.L. Svo. Maps. [In the press. NEW WORKS PUBLISHED BY LONGMANS & CO. Essays on the History of the Christian Relipion. By yohn Earl Russell. Fcp. Svo. 3J. 6d. History of the Reforma- tion in Etirope in the Time of Calvin. By the Rev. J. H. Merle UAtcbignS, D.D. Vols. I. to V. Svo. £3. I2s. Vols. VI. ^ VII. completioji. [In the press. The Student's Manual of A^icient History : con- taining the Political His- tory, Geographical Posi- tion, and Social State of the Principal Nations of Antiquity. ByW. CookeTaylor^LL.D. Crown %vo. *js. 6d. The Studenfs Manual of Modern History : contain- ing the Rise and Progress of the Principal Etiropean Nations, their Political History, and the Changes in their Social Condition. By W. Cooke Taylor, LL.D. Crown Svo. ys. dd. The Era of the Pro- testant Revolntion. By F. Seebohn, Author of * The Oxford Reformers! With 4 Maps and 1 2 Diagrams. Fcp. Svo. 2.S. 6d. The Crusades. By the Rev. G. W. Cox, M.A. Fcp. Svo. xvith Map, 2s. 6d. The Thirty Years War, 1618-1648. By Samtcel Rawson Gar- diner. Fcp. Svo. with Maps, 2s. 6d. The Houses of Lancaster and York ; with the Con- quest and Loss of France. By James Gairdner. Fcp. Svo. with Map, is. 6d. Edward the Third. By the Rev. W. Warburton, M.A. Fcp. Svo. with Maps, 2s. 6d. BIOGRAPHICAL \VORKS. Autobiography. By John Stuart Mill Svo. Js. 6d. Life and Correspondence of Richard Whately, D.D. late Archbishop of Dublin. By E, Jane Whately. New Edition in i vol. Crown Svo. [In the press. Life and Letters of Gil- bert Elliot, First Earl of MintOy from 1751 to 1806, when his Public Life in Europe was closed by his Appointment to the Vice- Royalty of India. Edited by the Countess of Minto. 3 vols, post Svo. 3 1 J. dd. NEW WORKS PUBLISHED BY LONGMANS & CO. Memoir of Thomas First Lord De7ima7i, for^nerly Lord Chief Justice of England. By Sir Joseph Arnould^ B.A, K,B. With two Portraits, 2 vols, 8vo. ;^2s. The Life of Lloyd First Lord Kenyon, By Hon. G. T. Kenyon, M.A. With Portraits. 8vo. 14s. Recollections of Past Life. By Sir Henry Holland, Bart. M.D. F.R.S. Third Edition. Post Svo. los. 6d. Lsaac Casaubon, 1559- 1614. By Mark Pattison, Rector of Lincoln College, Oxford. 2)V0. [In the press, Life of Alexander vo7i Htcmboldt. Edited by Karl Bruhns, and translated by Jane and Caroline Las sell. With 3 Portraits, 2 vols. 2>vo. 36^-. Biographical and Criti- cal Essays, reprinted from Reviews, with Additions and Corrections. By A. Hay ward, Q.C Second Series, 2 vols. %vo, i%s. Series, i vol. Svo. 14s. Third The Life of Lsambard Kingdom Brunei, Civil Engifieer. By /. Brunei, B.CL, With Portrait, Plates, and Woodcuts. Svo. 2 IS, Lord George Bentinck ; a Political Biography. By the Right Hon. B, Disraeli, M.P. Eighth Edition, Croxun Svo. 6s. Memoir of George Ed- ward Lynch Cotton, D.D. Bishop of Calcutta; with Selections from his foiir- nals and Correspoiidence. Edited by Mrs. Cotton. Second Edition. Crown Svo. *js. dd. The Life and Letters of the Rev. Sydney Smith. Edited by his Daughter, Lady Holland, a7td Mrs. Austin. Crown Svo. 2s. 6d, sewed; y, 6d, cloth. Essays in Ecclesiastical Biography. By the Right Hon. Sir jf. Stephen, LL.D. Cabinet Edition, Crown Svo. "js, 6d. Leaders of Public Opi- nion in Ireland ; Swift, Flood, Grattan, GConnell. By TV. E. H. Lecky, M.A, Cro7.vn Svo. *]s, 6d. NEW WORKS PUBLISHED BY LONGMANS &, CO. Li/e of the Ditke of Wellmgton. By the Rev. G, R. Gleig, M.A, Popular Edition^ Crcnon Svo. ivilh Por- trait^ 5.f. Felix Mendelssohn s Letters from Italy and Switzerland, and Letters from 1833 to 1847. Translated by I^ady Wal- lace. With Portrait. 2 vols, crown Svo. ^s. each. The Rise of Great Fami- lies; other Essays and Stories. By Sir Bernard Btcrke, C.B. LL.D. Crowtt Svo. I2f. 6d. Dictionary of General Biography ; containing Concise Memoirs and No- tices of the most Eminent Persons of all CountrieSy from the Eaidiest Ages to the Present Time. Edited by W. L. R. Gates. Svo. 2 IS. Memoirs of Sir Llenry Havelock, K.C.B. By John Clark Marshman. People's Edition. Crffiun Svo. 3j. 6(1. Vicissittides of Families, By Sir Bernard Burke, C.B. New Edition. 2 vols, croiun Svo. 2.\s. MENTAL and POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY. The Systeju of Positive Polity, or Treatise upon So- ciology, of Angus te Comte, Author of the System of Positive Philosophy. Translated from the Paris Edition of 1851-1854, and furnished with Ana- lytical Tables of Contefits. \In preparation. In Four Volumes^ Svo. to be published sepa- rately, and each forming in some degree an independent Treatise : — Vol. I. The General Viexu of Positive Polity and its Philosophical Basis. Trans- lated by ^. H. Bridges, Isl.^. for jnerly Fellow Oriel College, Oxford. Vol. If. The Social Statics, or the Ab- stract Laws of Human Order. Translated by Frederic Harrison, M.A. of Lincoln's Inn. Vol. III. The Social Dynamics, or the General Laws of Human Progress {the Phi- losophy of History). Translated by !£.. S. Beesly, M. A. Professor of History in Uni- versity College, London. Vol. IV. The Ideal of the Future oj Alankind. Translated by Richard Congreve, M.D. forma-ly Fello70 and Tutor of Wad- ham College, Oxford. Political Problems, Reprinted chiefly from the Fortnightly Review, revised, and with New Essays. By Frederick Harrison, of Lincoln's Inn. I vol. Zvo. [In the press. NEW WORKS PUBLISHED BY LONGMANS & CO. Essays Critical & Nar- rative, partly original and partly reprinted from Re- views. By W. Forsyth, Q,C. M.P. Svo. 1 6s. Essays, Political, Social, and Religious, By RicJid. Congreve, 31. A. 2>vo. 1 8 J. Essays on Freethinking and Plainspeaking. By Leslie Stephen. Crowji ^vo. los. 6d. Essays, Critical and Biographical, cofilribtcted to the Edinburgh Review. By Henry Rogers. New Edition. 2 vols, crown Zvo. \2s. Essays on some Fheo lo- gical Controversies of the Time, contributed chiefly to the Edinburgh Review. By the same AtUhor, New Edition. Crown '^vo. ds. Democracy in America. By Alexis de Tccqueville. .Translated by Henry Reeve, C.B. D.C.L. Corresponding Member of the Instil tit e of Frajice. N'ew Edition. 2 vols, post 8w. [In tJu press. On Representative Go- vermnent. By John Stuart Mill. Fourth Edition, crown %vo. 2s. On Liberty. By John Stttart Mill. Post Svo. js. 6d. crown Svo. \s. /^. Principles of Political Economy. By John Stuart Mill. 2 vols. Svo. 30J-, or i vol. crown Svo. <^s. Essays on someU^tsettled Questions of Political Eco- nomy. By John Sttiart Mill. Second Edition. Svo. 6j. dd. Utilitarianism. By John Sttiai-t Mill Fourth Edition. Svo. ^s. A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Fiduc- tive. By John Stuart Mill Eighth Edition. 2 vols. Svo. 25J. Examination of Sir Williafn Hamiltofis Phi- losophy, and of the pjHnci- pal Philosophical Questions discussed in his Writings. By John Sttcart Mill. Fourth Edition. Svo. l6s. FheSttbjection ofJVomen, By John Stuart Mill. Nezu Edition. Post Svo. ^s. Dissertations and Dis- • cussions. By John Stuart Mill. Second Edition. 3 vols. Svo. 36^, B 10 NEW WORKS PUBLISHED BY LONGMANS & CO. Analysis of the Pheno- mena of the Htmtan Mind. By faines Mill. New Edition, with Notes, Illustrative and Critical. 2 vols. %vo. 28j. A Systematic View of the Sciefice of Jtirispru- dence. By Sheldon Amos, M.A. %vo. \%s. A Primer of the English Constitution and Govern- ment. By Sheldon Amos, M.A. New Edition, revised. Post,%vo. \In the press. Principles of Eco7iomical Philosophy. By H. D. Macleod, M.A. Barrister-at-L aw. . Second Edition, in 2 vols. Vol. I. Svo. i^s. The Instittttes of yus- tinian ; with English In- troductiofi. Translation, and Notes. By T C. Sandars, M.A. Sixth Edition. Svo. iSs. Lord Bacons Works, Collected and Edited by R. L.Ellis, M.A. J.Sped- ding, M.A. and D. D. Heath. Neiv and Cheaper Edition. 7 ^^^•^' '^"'^o- ll- I3-^- ^d. Letters and Life of F^^ancis Bacon, hicluding all his Occasional Works. Collected and edited, with a Co7nmentary, by f. Spedding. 7 vols. Svo. ^4. 4s. The Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle. Newly trans- lated into English. By R. Williams, B.A. ZvO. \2S. The Politics of Aristotle; Greek Text, with English Notes. By Richard Congreve, M.A. New Edition, revised. Svo. i8s. The Ethics of Aristotle ; with Essays and Notes. By Sir A. Grant, Bart. M.A. LL.D. Third Edition, revised and partly re-written, \In the p-ess. Bacon's Essays^ with Annotations. By R. Whately, D.D, New Edition. Svo. los, 6d. Elements of Logic. By R. Whately, D.D. New Edition. Svo. ios.6d. cr. Svo. 45-. ()d. Elements of Rhetoric. By R. Whately, D.D. New Edition. Svo. \os. 6d. cr. Svo. 4^, dd. NEW WORKS PUBLISHED BY LONGMANS & CO. 11 An Otttline of the Neces- sary Laws of Thought : a Treatise on Pure and Applied Logic. By the Most Rev, W, Thomson, D.D, Arch- bishop of York, Ninth Thousand. Croivn %vo. ^s. 6d, An Introdttction to Men- tal Philosophy, on the In- ductive Method. By J. D. Morell, LL.D. SVO. 1 2s. Elements of Psychology, containing the Analysis of the Intellectual Powers. By J. D. Morell, LL.D. Post Svo. p. 6d. The Secret of Hegel: being the Hegelian System in Origin, Principle, Form, and Matter. By y. H. Stirling, LL.D. 2 vols. 8vo. 2Ss. Sir William Hamilton ; being the Philosophy of Perceptio7i : aft Analysis. By J. H. Stirling, LL.D. Svo. $s. The Philosophy of Ne- cessity ; or. Natural Law as applicable to Mental, Moral, and Social Science. By Charles Bray. Second Edition. Svo. gs. Ueberioegs System of Logic, and History of Logical Doctrines. Translated, with Notes and Appendices, by T M. Lindsay, M. A. F.R.S.E. Svo. i6s. The Senses and the Intellect. By A. Bain, LL.D. Prof of Logic, Univ. Aberdeen. Svo. \^s. Mental and Moral Science ; a Compendium of Psychology and Ethics. By A. Bain, LL.D. Third Edition. Crown Svo. los. 6d. Or separately: Part I. Mental Science, 6j". dd. Part II. Moral Science, 4-r. dd. Humes Treatise on Hu- man Nature. Edited, with Notes, &c. by T. H. Green, M.A. and the Rev. T. H. Grose, M.A. 2 vols. Svo. 28s. Humes Essays Moral, Political, and Literary. By the same Editors. 2 vols. Svo. 2Ss. *^* TAe above form a complete and uniform Edition of Hume's Philosophical Works. 12 NEW WORKS PUBLISHED BY LONGMANS & CO. MISCELLANEOUS & CRITICAL Vv^ORKS. Miscellaneous and Post- humous Works of the late He7try Thomas BiLckle. Edited.with a Biographical Notice, by Helen Taylor. 3 vols. Svo. £2. i2s. 6d. Short Studies on Great Szcbjects. By y. A. Froude, M.A. formerly Fellow of . Exeter College, Oxford. 2 vols, crown Svo. 12s. Lord Macatilay's Mis- cellaiieoics Writings. Library Edition, 2 z/^/j-. %vo. Portrait, 21s. People's Edition, i vol. cr. %vo. \s. 6d. Lord Macaulay's Mis- cellaneous Writings and Speeches. Students' Edition. Crown Svo. ds. Speeches of the Right Hon. Lord MacatUay, cor- rected by Himself People's Edition. Crown Svo. y. 6d. LordMacaulaysSpeeches on Parliamentary Reform in 1 83 1 and 1832. \(>mo. is. The Rev. Sydney Smith's Essays contributed to the Edinburgh Review. Authorised Edition, complete in One Volume, Crown Svo. 2s. 6d. sewed, or y. 6d. cloth. The Rev. Sydney Smith's MiscellaneoiLs Works. Crown Svo. (>s. The Wit and JVisdom of the Rev. Sydney Smith. Crown Svo. "^s. 6d. The Misc ellaneous Works of Thomas Ar7told, D.D. Late Head Master of Rugby School and Regius Professor of Modern His- tory in the Univ. of Ox- ford, collected and repub- lished. Svo. 'js. 6d. Manual of English Lite- ratui^e, Historical and Critical. By Thomas Arnold, M.A. Neiv Edition. Crozvn Svo. Js. 6d. Realities of Irish Life. By W. Steuart Trench. Cr. Svo. 2s. 6d. saved, or ^s. 6d. cloth. Lectures oit the Science of Language. By F. Max Miiller, M.A. &c. Seventh Edition. 2 vols, crowji Svo. i6s. Chips from a German Workshop; being Essays on the Science of Religion, and on Mythology, Tradi- tions, and Cicstoms. By F. Max Muller, M.A. &c. 3 voU. Svo. £2. NEW WORKS PUBLISHED BY LONGMANS & CO. 13 Families of Speech. Four Lecttcres delivered at the Royal InstittUio7i. By F, W. Farrar, M.A. F.R.S. New Edition. Croxvii Zvo. 3J. (jd. Chapters on Language, By F. TV. Farrar, M.A. F.R.S. N'av Edition. Crown Svo. ^s. Southeys Doctor, com- plete in One Volume. Edited by Rev. J. TV. Warier, B.D. Square crown Sz>o. 12s. 6d. A Budget of Paradoxes. By Augustus De M organ , F.R.A.S. Rep'inted, zvit/i AutJior''s Additions, from the Athenseutn. %vo. 15^. Recreations of a Coimtry Parson. By A. K. H. B. Two Series, 3^. 6d. each. Landscapes, Churches, and Moralities. By A. K. H. B. Crown %vo. 3^-. (id. Seaside Musings on Sun- days and TVeekdays. By A. K. H. B. Crown %vo. "^s. 6d. Changed Aspects of Un- changed Trztths. By A. K. H. B. Crown Zvo. 3J. 6^. Counsel and Comfort from a City Ptdpit. By A. K. H. B. Croivn Zvo. 3J-. dd. Lessons of Middle Age. By A. K. H. B. Crown %vo. 3J-. dd. Leisure Hours in Town By A.K..H.B. Crown Svo. y. 6d. The A^itumn Holidays of a Country Parson. By A. K. H. B. Crozvn '6vo. y.'bd. Sunday Afternoons at the Parish Chuixh of a Scottish University City. By A. K. H. B. Crowji Zvo. y. 6d. The Commonplace Phi- losopher in Town and Cotcntry. By A. K. H. B. Crowfi '&V0. 3>r. 6d. Present-Day Thoughts. By A. K. H. B. Crown Svo. y. 6d. u NEW WORKS PUBLISHED BY LONGMANS & CO. Critical Essays Cotmtry Parson. By A. K, H. B. Crown %vo. 3^. 6i/. of a The Graver Thoughts of a Country Parson, By A. K, H. B. Two Scries^ ^s. 6d. each. Principles of Education, drawn from Natiire and Revelation^ and applied to Female Education in the Upper Classes. By the Author of 'Amy Herbert! 2 vols. fcp. 8vo. 12S. 6d Fro7n yanuary to De- ^ ce m ber; a Book for Children, Second Edition. Svo. 3^'. 6d. The Election of Repre- sentatives, Parliamentary and Municipal ; a Treatise, By Thos. Hare, Barrister, Fourth Edition. Post Svo. Js. Miscellaneous JVritings of John Conington, M.A, Edited by f. A. Symonds, M.A. With a Memoir by H. y. S. Smith, M.A, 2 vols. Zvo. iZs. DICTIONARIES and OTHER BOOKS REFERENCE. of A Dictionary of the English Language. By R. G. Latham, M.A. M.D. F.R.S. Founded on the Dictionary of Dr. S. fohnson, as edited by the Rev. H. J. Todd, with mcmerous Emenda- tions and Additions, 4 vols. 4/^, £']. Thesaurus of English Words and Phrases, classi- fied and arranged so as to facilitate the expression of Ideas, and assist in L iterary Composition. By P. M. Roget, M.D, Crown %vo. \os. 6d. English Synonymes, ByE.y. Whately. Edited by Archbishop Whately, Fifth Edition. Fcp. Svo. 3^-. A Practical Dictionary of the French and English Languages. By Ldon Contanseau, many years French Examiner for Military and Civil Appointments, &c. Post Svo. los. 6d. Contanseau s Pocket Dic- tionary, French and Eng- lish, abridged from the Practical Dictionary, by the Atithor. Squcire iSmo. y. 6d. NEW WORKS PUBLISHED BY LONGMANS & CO. 15 New Practical Diction- ary of the Germmt Lan- guage ; German' - English and English-Germafi. By Rev, W, L. Blackley, M.A. and Dr, C, M, Friedldnder, Post %vo. "js. 6d. A Dictionary of Roman and Greek Antiquities. With 2,000 Woodc2its from Ancient Originals, illustrative of the Arts and Life of the Greeks and Romans. By Anthony Rich, B.A. Third Edition. Crown %vo. 'Js. 6d. The Mastery of Lan- gttages ; or, the Art of Speaking Foreign Tongues Idiomatically. By Thomas Prendergast. Second Edition. Svo. 6s. A Practical English Dic- tionary. By John T White, D.D. 0x071. and T C. Donkin, M.A. I vol. post Svo. uniform with Contanseau' s Practical French Dictionary. [In the press. A Latin-English Dic- tionary. By John T. White, D.D. Oxon. and J. E. Riddle, M.A. Oxo7i. Third Edition, revised. 2 vols. ^0. 42s. Whites College Latin- English Dictionary ; abridged from the Parent Work for the ttse of Uni- versity Sttcdents. Medium Svo. iSs. 'a Latin -English Dic- tionary adapted for the use of Middle-Class Schools, By John T White, D.D. Oxon. Square fcp. %vo. y. White syunior Studenf s Complete Latin - English and Ejiglish- Latin Dic- tionary. Square \27no. 12s. c. . . r /English-Latin, 5^-. 6d. A Greek-English Lexi- con. By H. G. Liddell, D.D. Dean of Christchtirch, and R. Scott, D.D. Dean of Rochester. Sixth Edition. Ci'own /^o. 2,^s. A Lexico7t, Greek and English, abridged for Schools from Liddell and Scotfs Greek - English Lexicon. Fourteenth Edition. Square l2mo. *js. 6d. 16 NEW WORKS PUBLISHED BY LONGMANS & CO. All English-Greek Lexi- con, containing all the Greek Words used by Writers of good authority. By G D, Yonge, B.A. New Edition, ^o. 2is. Mr, Yonge s New Lexicon, English a7idG7xek, abridged from his larger Lexicon, Square \2mo. 8j-. dd. M'CttllocKs Dictionary, Practical, Theoretical, and Histo7ncal, of Gornmerce and Go7nmercial Naviga- tion. Edited by H. G. Reid. %vo. 63J. The Post Office Gazetteer of the United Kingdom : a Gomplete Dictionary of all Gities, Towns, Villages, and of the Prmcipal Ge^itle- fnens Seats, in Great Bri- tain a?id Ireland, referred to the nearest Post Town, Railway & Teleg7^aph Sta- tion ; with Natural Featu7^es a7id Objects of Note. By f. A. Sha7^p. In I vol. 2>vo. of a hut i,<,oo pages. [/;/ the press. A General Dictio7tary of Geog7^aphy, Descriptive, Physical, Statistical, a7id Historical; for77ii7ig a co77i- plete Gazetteer of the World, By A, Keith Joh7isto7iy F.R.S.E. N'ew Edition, thoroughly revised. \In the press. The Public Schools A tlas of Moder7i Geography. I71 3 1 Maps, exhibiti7ig clea74y the 77iore i77iporta7it Physi- cal Features of the Cotm- t7^ies deli7ieated. Edited, with l7itroductio7ty by Rev. G. Butler, M.A, Imperial quarto, 3J-. (>d. sewed', <^s. cloth. The Public Schools Ma- final of Moder7i Geography For77ii7ig a Co77tp anion to * llie Ptcblic Schools Atlas of Modern Geog7'aphy! By Rev. G. Butler, M.A. \_Tn the press. The Public Schools Atlas of A7icie7it Geography. Edited, with a7i hitroduc- tio7i 071 the Study of A7i- cie7it Geog7^aphy, by the Rev. G. Butler, M.A. Imperial Quarto . \In the press. NEW WORKS PUBLISHED BY LONGMANS &, CO. 17 ASTRONOMY and METEOROLOGY. T/ie Universe and the Corning Transits ; Re- searches into and New Views respecting the Con- stitution of the Heavens. By R. A. Proctor, B.A. With 22 Charts and 22 Diagrams. %vo. ids. The Transits of Ventts ; A Poptdar Account of Past and Com uig Transits, from the first observed by Hor- rocks A.D. 1639 to the Transit of a.d. 2 i i 2 . By R, A. Proctor, B.A. Cantab. With 20 Plates and nnmerotcs IVoodcitts. Crcnon %vo. {Nearly ready. Essays on Astrono7ny. A Series of Papers on Planets aiid Meteors, the Sun and Sun-surrounding Space, Stars and Star Cloudlets. By R. A. Proctor, B.A. With 10 Plates and 24 Woodcuts. %vo. 1 2J-. The Moon ; her Motions, Aspect, Scenery, and Phy- sical Condition. By R. A. Proctor, B.A. With Plates, Chai-ts, Woodcuts, and Lunar Photographs. Crown Svo. I $s. The Sun ; Ruler, Light, Fire, and Life of the Pla- netary System. By R.A. Proctor, B.A. Second Edition. Plates and Woodcuts. Cr. Zvo. 14J. Saturn and its System. By R. A. Proctor, B.A. Zvo. laith 14 Plates, 145-, The Orbs Arotmd Us; a Series of Familiar Essays on the Moon and Planets, Meteors and Comets, the Sun and Coloured Pairs of Suns. By R. A. Proctor, B.A. Crown Zvo. "js. 6d. Other Worlds than Ours ; The Plurality of Worlds Studied tender the Light of Recent Scientific Re- searches. By R. A. Proctor, B.A. Third Edition, ivith 14 Illustrations. Cr. Svo. lOs.Gd. Brinkley's Astronomy. Revised and partly re-writ- ten, with Additional Chap- ters, and an Appendix of Q uestionsforExa m ination . By John W. Stubbs, D.D. Trin. Coll. Dublin and T. Brunnow, Ph.D. Astronomer Royal of Irelaiid. With 49 Diagrams. Crozvn Zvo. 6s. Outlines of Astrono7ny. By Sir J. F. W. Herschel, Bart. M.A. Latest Edition, with Plates and Diagrams. Square crown Svo.^izs. C NEW WORKS PUBLISHED BY LONGMANS & CO. A New star Atlas, for the Library, the School, and the Observatory, in 1 2 Cir- cular Maps (with 2 Index Plates). By R. A, Proctor, B.A, Crown Svo. ^s. Celestial Objects for Com- mon Telescopes, By T, W. Webb, M,A. KR.A.S. New Edition, with Map of the Moon and Woodcuts. Crown ?>vo. 'js. 6d. LargerStarAtlas,forthe Library, in Twelve Cir- ctilar Maps, photolitho- graphed by A. Brothers, F.R.AS. With 2 Index Plates aiid a Letterpress Introduction. By R. A, Proctor, BA. Second Edition. Small folio, i^s. Magnetism and Devia- tion of the Compass. For ■the use of Students in Navi- gation and Science Schools. By J. Merrifield, LL.D. \Zmo. IS. 6d. Doves Law of Storms, considered in co7inexion with the ordinary Movements of ' the Atmosphere. Translated by R. H. Scott, M.A. 2>vo. los. 6d, Air and Rain ; the Be- gimiings of a Chemical Climatology. By R. A. Smith, F.R.S. %V0. IdfS. Nautical Surveying, an Introduction to the Practi- cal and Theoretical Study of By J. K. Laughton, M.A. Small %vo. 6j. Schellen's Spectrum Ana- lysis, in its Application to Terrestrial Stibstances and the Physical Constitution of the Heavenly Bodies. Translated by Jane and C. Lassell ; edited, with Notes, by W. Htggins, LL.D. F.R.S. With 13 Plates and 222, Woodcuts. Svo. 2Ss. NATURAL HISTORY and SCIENCE. PHYSICAL Tke Correlation of Phy- sical Forces. By the Hon. Sir W. R. Grove, F.R.S. &c. Sixth Edition, with other Contributions to Science. Svo. I^s. Professor Helmholfz' Popular Lecttires 07i Scien- tific Stibjects. Translated by E. Atkinson, F.C.S. With miny Illustrative Wood Engravijtgs. Svo. I2S. 6d. NEW WORKS PUBLISHED BY LONGMANS & CO. 19 Ganofs Natural Philo- sophy for General Readers and Yoimg Persons; a Course of Physics divested of Mathematical Formnlcs and expressed in the la7i- guage of daily life. Translated by E. Atkinson, PCS, Cr. Svo. 7vit/i. 404 Woodcuts^ 'js. 6d. Ganofs Elementary Treatise 07i Physics, Ex- perimental and Applied, for the use of Colleges and Schools. Translated and edited by E. Atkinson, P.C.S. Nno Edition, with a Coloured Plate and 726 Woodcuts. Post %vo. 15^. Principles of Animal Mechanics. By the Rev, S. Haughton, F.R.S. Second Edition. Svo. 2 is. IVeinhold's Introduction to Experimental Physics, Theoretical and Practical ; i7tcludi?ig Directions for Constructing Physical Ap- paratus and for Making Experi7ne7its, Translated by B. Loewy, F.R.A.S. With a Pre- face by G. C. Poster, F.R.S. With numerous Woodcuts. Svo. \Nearly ready. Text-Books of Science, Mechanical and Physical, adapted for the use of Arti- sans and of Students in Public a7td other Schools, {The first Te7i edited by T M. Goodeve, M.A, Lec- turer 071 Applied Science at the Royal School of Mines; the remainder edited by C. W. Merrifield, P.R.S. a7i Exa77tiner 171 the De- partme7it of Public Educa- lio7i.) Small Svo. Woodcuts. Edited by T. M. Goodeve, M.A. Anderson's Strength of Materials, ^s. 6d. Bloxam's Metals, t,s. 6d. Goodeve' s Alechanics, y. 6d. — Mechanism, 3^. 6d. Griffin's Algebra &> Trigonoj?ietry, 3^. 6d. Notes on the same, with Solutions, 3J. dd, Jenkin's Electricity dr* Magnetism, y. 6d. Maxwell's Theory of Heat, 3^-. 6d. Merrifield's Technical Arithmetic, 3^. 6d. Key, 3^-. dd. Miller's Inorganic Chemistry, y. 6d. Shelley's Workshop Appliances, 3^. dd. Watson's Plane dr^ Solid Geotnetry, y. 6d. Edited by C. W. Merrifield, F.R.S. Armstrong's Organic Chemistry, 3^. dd. Thorpe's Quantitative Analysis, \s. 6d. Thorpe and Muir's Qualitative Analysis, 2,s. 6d. Address delivered before the British Associatio7i asse7nbled at Belfast ; with Additio7is and a Preface. By yoh7i Tyndall, P.R.S. Preside7it. Svo. price 3J. Fragments of Science. By John Ty7idall, F.R.S. Third Edition. Svo. 14?. 20 NEW WORKS PUBLISHED BY LONGMANS & CO. Heat a Mode of Motion. By yohii Tyiidall, F.R.S, Fourth Edition. \os. 6d. Cr. ?>vo. with Woodcuts, Sound; a Course of Eight Lectures delivered at the Royal histittitioii of Great Britain. By John Tyndall, F.R.S. Portrait and Woodcuts. Cr. Svo. gs. Researches on Dianiag- netism and Magne- Crystal- lie Action; inclnding the Question of Diamagnetic Polarity. By John Tyndall, F.R.S. With 6 Plates and many Woodcuts. Sz'o. 14s. Contridutions to Mole- cular Physics in the do- main of Radiant Heat. By John Tyndall, F.R.S. With 2 Plates and 31 Woodcuts. Zvo. ids. Lectures on Light, de- livered in the United States of America in 1872 and 1873- By 7. Tyndall, F.R.S. Crown Svo. Js. 6d. Notes of a Course of Seven Lectures on Flectri- cal Phenomena and Theo- ries, delivered at the Royal Institution. By J. Ty7idall, F.R.S. Crown 2>vo. is. sewed, or is. 6d. cloth. Notes of a Course of Nine Lecttires on Light, delivered at the Royal Instittttion. By y. Tyndall, F.R.S. Crown Svo. is. sewed, or is. 6d. cloth. A Treatise on Magne- tism, General and Terres- trial. By Htmiphrey Lloyd, D.D. D.C.L. Provost of Trinity College, Dublin. Svo. price \0s. 6d. Elementary Treatise on the Wave-Theory of Light, By H. Lloyd, D.D. D.C.L, Third Edition. Svo. los. 6d. Professor Owen's I^ec- ttcres on the Comparative Anatomy and Physiology of Invertebrate Animals. ind Edition, with 235 Woodcuts. Svo. 2.\s. The Comparative Ana- tomy and Physiology of the Vertebrate Animals. By Richard Owen, F.R.S. With 1,472 Woodcuts.^ vols. Svo. /^^. i^s.Gd. Light Science for Lei- sure Honrs ; a Series of Familiar Essays on Scien- tific Subjects, Nattiral Phe- nomena, &c. By R. A. Proctor, B.A. First and Second Series. 2 vols. cro7uti Svo. Js. 6d. each. NEW WORKS PUBLISHED BY LONGMANS & CO. 21 Kirby and Spences In- troditction to Entomology, or Elements of the Natter al History of Insects, Craivn Sfo. ^s. Strange Dwellings ; a De- scription of the Habitations of A nimals, abridged from ' Homes zuit hotel Hands' By Rev. f. G. Wood, M.A. With Frontispiece and 6o Woodcuts. Crotvn Zvo. 'js. 6d. Homes withottt Ha7ids ; a Description of the Habi- tations of Animals, classed accoj^ding to their Principle of Constt^tLction. By Rev. J. G. Wood, M.A. With about 140 Vignettes on Wood. %vo. 2\s. Onf of Doors ; a Selec- tion of Original Articles on Pt^actical Natttral His- tory. By Rev. J. G. Wood, M.A. With 6 Illustrations from Original Designs engraved on Wood. Cro7.on %vo. 'js. 6d. The Polar World: a Poptclar Description of Man and Nature in the Arctic and Antarctic Re- gions of the Globe. By Dr. G. Hartivig. With Chromoxylographs^ Mafs, and Wood- cuts. Sz'o. los. 6d. The Sea and its Living Wonders. By Dr. G. Hartwig. Fourth Edition, enlarged. Svo. with many Illustrations, \qs. 6d, The Tropical World ; a Poptdar Scientific Account of the Nattd^al History of the Equatorial Regions. By Dr. G. Hartwig. With about 200 Illustrations. Zz'o. \os. 6d. The Subterranean World, By Dr. G. Hartwig. With Maps and many Woodcuts. Svo. 2 is. The Aerial World. By Dr. George Hartwig. With 8 'Chromoxylographs and about 60 other Illustrations aigraved on Wood. Sz'o. price 2.\s. Insects at Home; a Popu- lar Accotmt of British IitsectSj their Strttcturey HabitSy and Transforma- tions. By Rev. J. G. Woody M.A, With upzuards of "joo Woodcuts. Svo. 21 s. Insects Abroad ; being a Popular Accotcnt of Foreign ' Itisects, their Strtccttire, Ha- bits, and Transfortnatiotts. By Rev. J. G. Woody M.A, With upwards of ^00 Woodcuts, ^vo. 2ls. A Fa7niliar History of Bit^ds. By E. Stanleyy D.D. late Ld. Bishop of Norwich, Fcp. Svo. with WoodcutSy TyS. 6d. 22 NEW WORKS PUBLISHED BY LONGMANS & CO. Rocks Classified and De- scribed. By B. Von Cotta. English Edition, by P. H. Lawrence {with English^ German, and French Syno- nymes), revised by the Author. Post Svo. 14s. Primceval JVorld of Swit- zerland. By Professor Oswald Heer, of the University of Ztcrich. Translated by W. S. Dallas, F.L.S. and edited by Raines Hey wood, M.A. F.R.S. 2 vols. Svo. with numerous Illustrations. {In the press. The Origin of Civilisa- tion, and the Primitive Condition of Man; Men- tal and Social Condition of Savages. By Sir J. Ltcbbock, Bart. M.P. F.R.S. Third Editio7t, with 2^ Woodcuts. Svo. i6s. A Mcmual of Anthro- pology, or Science of Man, based on Modern Research. By Charles Bray. Crown Svo. ^s. A Phrenologist amongst the Todas, or the Study of a Primitive Tribe hi South India; History, Character, Ctcstoms, Religion, Infanti- cide, Polyandry, Language. By W. E. Marshall, Liettt.- Col. Bengal Staff Corps. With 26 Illustrations. Svo. 2is. The Ancient Stone Im- plements, Weapojis, a7id Or- naments of Great Britain. By John Evans, F.R.S. With 2 Plates and 476 Woodcuts. Svo. 2Ss, The Elements of Botany for Families and Schools. Tenth Edition, revised by Thomas Moore, F.L.S. Fcp. Svo. tvith 154 Woodcuts 2s. 6d. Bible Animals; a De- scrip tio7i of eve7y Living Creature me7itio7ied in the Scriptures, from the Ape to the Coral. By Rev. J. G. Wood, M.A. With about 1 00 Vignettes on Wood. Svo. 2is. The Rose Amateur s Gtdde. By Thomas Rivers. Tenth Edition. Fcp. Svo. 4$'. A Dictionary of Science, Liter attire, and Art. Fourth Edition, re-edited by the late W. T. Brande (the Author ) and Rev. G. W. Cox, M.A. 3 vols, medium Svo. 63^. London's Encyclopcedia of Plants ; comprising the Specific Character, Descrip- tion, Ctdture, History, &c. of all the Plants found in Great Britain. Jf ith upwards 0/12, 000 Woodcuts. Svo. 42s. NEW WORKS PUBLISHED BY LONGMANS & CO. 23 The Treasury of Botany , or Popidar Dictionary of the Vegetable Kingdom ; with which is incorporated a Glossary of Botanical Terms. Edited by J, Ltndley, F.R.S. and T. Moore, F.L.S, With 274 Woodcuts and 20 Steel Plates. Two Par is ^ fcp. %vo. \2s. Handbook of Hardy Trees, Shrnbs, and Her- baceous Plants; containing Descriptio7is &c. of the Best Species in Ctdtivation ; with Ctdtural Details, Comparative Hardiness, sidtability for partictdar positions, &c. Based on the French Work of De- caisne and Naudin, and inchtding the 720 Original WoodctU Illustrations. By W. B. Hemsley. Medium %vo. 2 is. A General System of Descriptive and Analytical Botany. Translated from theFrench of Le MaoiU and De- caisne, by Mrs. Hooker. Edited and arranged according to the English Botanical System, by J. D. Hooker, M.D. &c. Director of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. With 5 > 500 Woodcuts. Imperial 2)V0. 5 2 j. 6d. Forest Trees and Wood- la nd Scefiery, as described in Ancient and Modern Poets. By William Menzies, De- pidy Surveyor of Wind- sor Forest a7id Parks, &c. In One Volume, imperial a^o. with Twenty Plates, Coloured in facsimile of the original drawings, price £^. ^s. [Preparing for publication. CHEMISTRY and PHYSIOLOGY. Millers Eleinents of Chemistry, Theoretical and Practical. Re-edited, with Additions, by H. Macleod, FC.S. 3 vols. Svo. £z. Part I. Chemical Physics, i5j-. Part II. Inorganic Chemistry, 2Ij-. Part III. Organic Chemistry, 245-. A Manual of Chemical Physiology, including its Points of Contact with Pathology. By y.L. W. Thudichum, M.D. m Svo. with Woodcuts, *js. 6d. 24 NEW WORKS PUBLISHED BY LONGMANS 8i CO. ^ Dictionary of Che- mistry a7id the Allied Branches of other Sciences. By Henry Watts, F.C.S. assisted by eminent Scientific and Practical Chemists. 6 vols, medium %vo. £8. 14s. dd. Second Supplement com- pleting the Record of Dis- covery to the end of 1872. \In the press. A Course of Practical Chemistry, for the tcse of Medical Students. By W. Odling, F.R.S. Crown Svo. Woodcuts, "js. 6d. ' Select Methods in Chemi- cal Analysis, chiefly I 7ior- ganic. By Wm. Crookes, F.R.S. With 22 Woodcuts. Crown Svo. 12s. 6d. Todd and Bowmafis Physiological A natomy, and Physiology of Man. Vol. II. li'ith nu7nerous Plustratijus, i<^s. Vol. I. NrM Edition by Dr. Lionel S. Beale, F.R.S. in course of publication, with vu7nerous Illustrations. Parts I. and II. in Zvo. price 'js. 6d. each. Outlines of Physiology, Hitman and Comparative. By y. Marshall, P.R.CS. Surgeon to the Univer- sity College Hospital. 2 vols. cr. %vo. with 122 Woodcuts, yis. The FINE ARTS and ILLUSTRATED EDITIONS. Albert Durer, his Life and Works; including A zi- tobiographical Papers arid Complete Catalogues. By William B. Scott. With 6 Etchings by the Author a?id other Illustrations. %vo. i6s. In Fairyland ; Pictures from the Elf World. By Richard Doyle. With a Poern by W. Allingham. With 16 coloured Plates, containing 36 De- signs. Second Edition, folio, \^s. A Dictionary of Artists of the English School : Painters, Sculptors, Archi- tects, Engravers, and Orna- ment ists ; with Notices of their Lives and Works. By Samuel Redgrave^ Sz'o. i6s. The New Testament, il- lustrated with Wood En- gravings after the Early Masters, chiefly of the Italian School. Croivn ^0. 63J. NEW WORKS PUBLISHED BY LONGMANS 8c GO. 25 T/ie Life of Man Sym- bolised by the Months of the Year, Text selected by R. Pigot. 25 I/lusl rations on JVbod from Designs by yohn Leighton, F.S.A. Quarto, ^2s. Lyra Germanica ; the Christia7t Year and the Christian Life. Translated by Miss C. Winkworth. With about 325 Woodcut Illustrations by J. Leighton y F.S.A. and other Artists. 2 vols. 4/^. price 42s. Lord Macatday s Lays of Ancient Rome. With 90 Illustrations on Wood f'om Drawings by G. Scharf Fcp. 4to. 2 1 J. Miniature Edition, with Scharf s 90 I llustratio7is redicced in Lithography. Imp. \6mo. los. 6d. Sacred and Legendary Art. By Mrs. Jameson. 6 vols, squai'e crown Svo. price £^^. \<^s. 6d. asfollo2vs: — Legends of the Saints and Ma?^tyrs. New Edition, with 19 Etchings and 187 Woodcuts. 2 vols. 3 1 J. (xi. Legends of the Monastic Orders. New Edition, with II Etchings and 88 Woodcuts. I vol. 21 s. Legends of the Madonna. Nezu Edition, with 27 Etchings and 165 Woodcuts. I vol. 2 1 J. The History ofOnrLord, with that of his Types and Precursors. Completed by Lady East- lake. Revised Edition, tvith 13 Etchings and 28 1 Woodcuts. 2 vols. 42s. The USEFUL ARTS, MANUFACTURES, &c. ^ Mamial of Architec- . tn7^e : being a Concise His- tory and Explanatiofi of the Principal Styles of Eui^o- pean Architecticre, A7icient, MedicEval, and Renaissance; with a Glossary. By Tho77ias Mitchell, Au- thor of * The Stepping Stone to Architecture! With 150 Woodcuts. Croum ?>vo. los. 6d. History of the Gothic Revival ; an Atte^npt to shew how far the taste for MedicEval Architecture was retaiTiedin England duriiig the last two centiuHes, and has been re-developed in the present. By Charles L. East lake y Architect. With 48 Illustrations. Imp. Svo. 3IJ. 6d. D 26 NEW WORKS PUBLISHED BY LONGMANS & CO. Industrial Chemistry ; a Manual for Manufactu- rers and for Colleges or Technical Schools. Beifig a Translation of Professors Stohmann and Englers German Edition of Pay ens ''Precis de Chimie Indus- trie lie,' by Dr, J. D. Barry. Edited, and supplemented with Chapters on the Chemistry of the Metals, by B. H. Paul Ph.D. %vo. with Plates and Woodcuts. [In the press. Gwilfs Encyclopcedia of Architecture, with above 1, 600 Woodcuts. Fifth Edition, with Altera lions and Additions, by Wyatt Papworth. Szjo. ^2s. 6d. The Three Cathedrals dedicated to St. Pattl in London ; their History from the Foundation of the First Building in the Sixth Century to the Pro- posals for the Adornment of the Present Cathedral. By W. Longman, F.S.A. With numerous Illustrations. Square croxvn Svo. 21 s. Hin ts on Household Taste in Ftirniticre, Up- holstery, and other Details. By Charles L. East lake, Architect. New Edition, with about 90 Illustrations. Square crotvn Svo. 14s. Geometric Turning; com- prising a Description of Plant's New Geometric Chuck, with Directions for its use, and a Series of Patterns cut by it, with Explanations. By H. S. Savory. With 571 Woodcuts. Square cr. %vo. 2\s. Lathes and Turning, Simple, Mechanical, and Or7tamental. By W. Henry Northcott. With 240 Illustrations. Svo. iSs. Handbook of Practical Telegraphy. By R. S. Ctdley, Memb. Inst. C.E. Engineer-in- Chief of Telegraphs to the Post-Office. Sixth Edition, Plates ^ Woodcuts. %vo. ids. \ PHnciples of Mechanism, for the use of Students in the Universities, and for Engineering Students. By R. Willis, M.A. F.R.S. Professor in the Univer- sity of Cambridge. Second Editiojt, with 374 Woodcuts. Svo. iSs. Perspective ; or, the Art of Drawing what one Sees : for the Use of those Sketch- ing from Nature. By Lieut. W. H. Collins, R.E. F.R.A.S. With 37 Woodcuts. Crown %vo. 5 J. NEW WORKS PUBLISHED BY LONGMANS & CO. 27 Encyclopcedia of Civil Engineering, Historical, Theoretical and Practical By E. Cresy, C.E. With above 3,000 Woodcuts. 2>vo. 42^. A Treatise on the Steam Engine, in its various ap- plications to Mines., Mills, Steam Navigation, Rail- ways and Agriculture. By y. Bourne, C.E, With Portrait, 37 Plates, and 546 Wood- cuts. ^0. 42s. Catec/tism of the Steam Engine, in its various Ap- plications. By John Bourne, C.E. New Edition, with 89 Woodcuts. Fcp. Svo. 6s. Handbook of the Steam Engine. By y. Botirne, C.E. form- ing a Key to the Author s Catechism of the Steam Engine. With 67 Woodcuts. Fcp. Svo. gs. Recent Improvements in the Steam Engine. By y . Bourne, C.E. With 124 Woodcuts. Fcp. Svo. 6s. Lowndes s Engineer' s Handbook ; explaining the Principles which should guide the Young Engineer in the Construction of Ma- chinery. Post Svo. $s. [/re's Dictionary of Arts ^ Manufacttires, and Mines. Sixth Edition, re-written and greatly enlarged by R. Hunt, F.R.S. assisted by numerous Contributors, With 2,000 Woodcuts. 3 vols, medium Svo. £^. i4r. 6d. Handbook to the Minera- logy of Cornwall and Devon; with Instructions for their Discrimination, and copious Tables of Lo- cality. By y. H. Collins, F.G.S. With 10 Plates, Svo. 6s. Guns and Steel ; Miscel- laneous Papers on Mechani- cal Subjects. By Sir y. Whitworth, C.E. F.R.S. With Illustrations. Royal Svo. *js. 6d. Practical Treatise on Metallurgy, Adapted from the last Ger- man Edition ofProfessor Kerfs Metallurgy by W. Crookes, F.R.S. &c. and E. R'dhrig, Ph.D. 3 vols. Svo. with 625 Woodcuts. ^4. 19^-. Treatise on Mills and Millwork. By Sir W. Fairbairn, Bt. With 18 Plates and 322 Woodcuts. 2 vols. Svo. 12s. 28 NEV/ WORKS PUBLISHED BY LONGMANS &, CO. Useful Iiiforination for Engineers. By Sir W. Fairbairn, Bt. With many Plates and Woodcuts. 3 vols, crown %vo. 3IJ. (id. The Applicatioft of Cast and WroiLght Iron to Bidlding Picrposes. By Sir W. Fair bairn, Bt. With 6 Plates and 1 18 Woodcuts. %vo. i6j. The Strains in Trusses Computed by means of Dia- grams ; aiith 20 Examples. By F. A. Ranken, CE. With 35 Diagrams. Square cr, Zvo. 6x. dd. Practical Handbook of Dyeing and Calico-Print- ing. By W. Crookes, F.R.S. &c. With numerous Illustrations and Specime7is of Dyed Textile Fabrics. Svo. 42s. Mitcheirs Manual of Practical Assaying. Fourth Edition, revised, with the Recent Disco- veries incorporated, by W. Crookes, F.R.S. Svo. Woodcuts, 3 1 J. 6d. Occasional Papers on Subjects connected with Civil Engineering, Gzm- nery, and Naval Archi- tecture. By Michael Scott, Memb. List. C.E. & of Inst. N.A. 2 vols. Zvo. with Plates, 42s. London s Encyclopcedia of Gardeni7ig : comprising the Theory and Practice of Hoi^ticidture, Floriculture, Arboriculture, and Land- scape Garde7iing. With 1,000 Woodcuts. Zvo. 21 s. London s Encyclopcedia of Agricidture : comp7asi7tg the Layiftg-out, Improve- ment, and Manage7nent of Landed Prope7^ty, a7id the Ctdtivatio7i a7td Eco7io77iy of the Productio7is of Agri- cidture. With 1,100 Woodcuts. Svo. 2 is. RELIGIOUS and MORAL V/ORKS. y^n Exposition of the 39 Articles, IIisto7'ical a7icl Doctri7ial. By E. H. Brow7ie, D.D. Bishop of Wi7tchester. Nru) Edition. Svo. i6s. An Introduction to the Theology of the Chu7xh of E7igla7id, 171 a7i Expositio7t of the 39 Articles. By Rev. T. P. Botdtbee, LL.D. Fcp. Svo. 6s. • NEW WORKS PUBLISHED BY LONGMANS El CO. 29 Historical Lectures on the Life of Our Lord Jesiis Christ. By C, y. Ellicott, D.D. Fifth Edition. %vo. \2s. Sermons; including Two Sermons on the Interpre- tation of Prophecy, and an Essay on the Right Inter- pretation and Understand- ing of the, Scripticres. By the late Rev. Thomas Arnold, D.D. 3 vols. Svo. price 24s, Christian Life, its Course, its Hindi^ances, and its Helps; Sermons preached mostly in the Chapel of Rtcgby School. By the late Rev. Thomas Arnold, D.D. Svo. p. 6d. Christian Life, its Hopes, its Fears, and its Close; Sermons preached 7nostly in the Chapel of Rtcgby School. ■ By the late Rev. Thomas Arnold, D.D. Svo. p. 6d. Sermons Chiefly on the Interpretation of Scrip- ture. By the late Rev. Thomas Arnold, D.D. Svo. price 1$. (>d. Sermons preached in the Chapel of Rtcgby School ; zvith an Addi^ess before Confirmation. By the late Rev. Thomas Arnold, D.D. Fcp. Svo. price y. 6d. Three Essays on Reli- gion : Naticre ; the Utility of Religion; Theism. By John Sttcart Mill. Svo. price \0s. 6d. Synonyms of the Old Tes- lament, their Bearing on Christian Faith and Practice. By Rev. R. B. Girdlestonc. Svo. 15X. Reasons of Faith; or, the Order of the Christian Argument Developed and Explained. By Rev. G. S. Drew, M.A. Second Edition. Fcp. Svo. 6j. The Eclipse of Faith ; or a Visit to a Religious Sceptic. By Henrv Rogers. Latest Edition. Fcp. Svo. ^s. Defence of the Eclipse of Faith. By Henry Rogers. Latest Edition. Fcp. Svo. 3J. 6t/. 30 NEW WORKS PUBLISHED BY LONGMANS & CO. Sermons for the Times preached in St. Paul's Cathedral and elsewhere. By Rev. T. Griffith, M.A. Crown Svo. 6s. The Life mid Epistles of St. Paid. By Rev. W. J. Conydeare, M.A. and Very Rev. J. S. Howso7t, D.D. Library Edition, with all the Original Illustrations, Maps, Landscapes on Steel, Woodcuts, ^T'c. 2 vols. dfto. 48j-. Intermediate Edition, with a Selection of Maps, Plates, and Woodcuts. 2 vols, square cro^vn Svo. 21 s. Student's Edition, revised and condensed, ivith 46 Illustrations and Maps, i vol. crown Svo. gs. A Critical and Gram- matical Com7ne7ttary 07i St. Paul's Epistles. By C. 7. Ellicott, D.D. Zvo. Galatians, 8j. dd. Ephesians, %s. 6d. Pastoral Epistles, los. 6d. Philippi- ans, Colossians, & Philemon, lOi-. 6d. Thessalonians, 'js. 6d. The Voyage and Ship- wreck of St. Paul ; with Dissertations 07i the Ships and Navigatio7i of the Ancients. By fames Smith, F.R.S. Crown 2>vo. Charts, los. 6d. Evidence of the Truth of the Christian Religion derived from the Literal Fulfilment of Prophecy. By Alexander Keith, D.D. Apth Edition, with numerous Plates. Square 2>vo. 12s. bd. or in post Svo. with 5 Plates, ds. Historical and Critical Commentary on the Old Testa^nent ; with a New Translation. By M. M. Kalisch, Ph.D. Vol. I. Genesis, 2>vo. i8j. or adapted for the General Reader, 12s. Vol.11. Exodus, 1 5 J. or adapted for the General Reader ^ I2s. Vol. III. Leviticus, Parti. i$s. or adapted for the Getieral Reader, 8j. Vol. IV. Leviticus, Part II. \^s. or adapted for the General Reader, %s. The History and Litera- ture of the Israelites, ac- cording to the Old Testa- ment and the Apocrypha. By C. De Rothschild and A. De Rothschild. Second Edition. 2 vols. crown%vo. \2s. 6d. Abridged Edition, in i vol. fcp. Svo. ^s. 6d. Bwald's History of Israel. Translated from the Ger- man by J . E. Carpenter, M.A. with Preface by R. Martineau, M.A. 5 vols. Svo. 6^s. Commentary on Epistle to the Romans. By Rev. W. A. GConor, Crown Svo. '^s. 6d. A Commentary on the Gospel of St. John. By Rev. W. A. GConor. Crowjt Svo. 10s. 6d. The Epistle to the He- brews ; with Analytical Int7^oductio7i and Notes. By Rev. W. A. GConor. Croivn Svo. 4^. 6d. NEW WORKS PUBLISHED BY LONGMANS & CO. 31 Thoughts for the Age, By Elizabeth M. Sewell. New Edition. Fcp. Svo. y. 6d. Passing Thoughts on Religion. By Elizabeth M. Sewell Fcp. Svo. 3J. 6d. Self-examination before Confrmation. By Elizabeth M. SewelL '^2mo. 6d. Preparation for the Holy Co7nmunion ; the Devotions chiefly from the works of feremy Taylor. By Elizabeth M. Sewell. 2,2mo. 3J. Readings for a Month Preparatory to Confirma- tion, from Writers of the Early and English Church. By Elizabeth M. Sewell. Fcp. %vo. OfS. Readings for Every Day in Lent, compiled from the Writings of Bishop . Jeremy Taylor. By Elizabeth M. SewelL Fcp. Zvo. 5^. Bishop yeremy Taylor s Entire Works ; with Life by Bishop Heber. Revised and corrected by the Rev. C. P. Eden. lo vols. ^5. 5J-. Hymns of Praise and Prayer. Collected and edited by Rev, J . Marti7iean, LL.D. Crown Svo. 4s. 6d. Thoughts for the Holy Week, for Young Persons, By Elizabeth M. Sewell. New Edition. Fcp. Svo. 2s. Spiritual Songs for the Sundays and Holidays throughout the Year. By J. S. B. Monsell, LL.D. Fourth Edition. Fcp. Sz>o. /\s. 6d. Lyra Germaitica; Hymns tra^islatedfrom the German by Miss C. Winkworth. 2 series, fcp. Svo. y. 6d. each. Endeavours after the Christian Life; Discourses. By Rev. y . Martifieau, LL.D. Fifth Edition. Crown Svo. Js. 6d. An Introduction to the Study of the New Testa- ment, Critical, Exegetical, and Theological. By Rev. S. Davidso7i, D.D. 2 vols. Svo. Tf)S. Supernatural Religion ; an Inqiiiry into the Reality of Divine Revelation. New Edition. 2 vols. Svo. 2\s. 32 NEW WORKS PUBLISHED BY LONGMANS & CO. The Life of Christ. For the use of Yoimg Per- sons^ selected from the Gos- pels and Chronologically arranged ; zvith Supple- mentary Notices from parallel Passages. By the Rev. R. B. Gar- diner, M.A. Croivn Sz'o. 2s. Lectures on the Penta- teiLch & the Moabite Sto7ie; with Appendices. By 7. W. Coleiiso, D.D. Bishop of Natal. Svo. I2s. The Pentateuch and Book of fosJiua Critically Ex- amined. By 7. TV. Colenso, D.D. Bishop of Natal. Crown Svo. 6s. The New Bible Com- mentary, by Bishops and other Clergy of the An- glicart Chu7^ch, critically examined by the Rt. Rev. 7. W. Colenso, D.D. Bishop of Natal. Svo. 25.C TRAVELS, VOYAG-ES, &c. The Valleys of Tirol ; their T7'aditio7is and Ctts- toms, and Hozu to Visit them. By Miss R. H. Busk, Author of ' The Folk- Lore of Rome' &c. With Frontispiece and 3 Maps. Croxvii Svo. \2S. 6d. Eight Years in Ceylon. By Sir Samuel W. Baker, M.A. F.R.G.S. Ncxv Edition, rvith Illttstrations engraved on Wood by G. Pearson. Croivn Svo. Price ^s. dd. The Rifle and the Hound in Ceylon. By Sir Samuel W. Baker, M.A. F.R.G.S. N'eio Edition, with Illust7-ations engraved on Wood by G. Pearson. Cro7vn Svo. Price Is. dd. Meeting the Stm ; a fotcrney all round the World through Egypt, China, ^apan, and Cali- fornia. By William Simpson, F.R.G.S. With Heliotypes aytd Woodcuts. Svo. 24s. The Rural Life of Eng- land. By William Howitt. Woodcuts, Zvo. \2s. 6d. The Dolomite Moun- tai^is. Excursions through Tyrol, CaiHnthia, Carniola, and Friuli By y. Gilbert and G. C Ch urch ill, F. R. G. S. I With Illustrations. Sq. cr. %vo. lis. NEW WORKS PUBLISHED BY LONGMANS & CO. The Alpine Club Map of the Chain of Mont Blanc, from an actual Stcr- vey in 1 863-1 864. By A, Adams-Reilly, KR.G.S. M.A.C In Chromolithography^ on extra stout drmv- ing paper \os. or mounted on canvas in a folding case, I2s. 6d. The Alpine Chib Map of the Valpelline, the Val Tournanche, and the South- ern Valleys of the Chain of Monte Rosa, fro7n acttial Survey. By A. Adams-Reilly , RR.GS. M.A.C Price ds. on extra Stout Drawing Paper, or ']s. 6d. mounted in a Folding Case. Hours of Exercise in the Alps, By John Tyndall, F.R.S. Third Edition. Whymper. with 7 Woodcuts by E. Crozun Svo. I2s. 6d. Guide tothe Pyrenees, for the tcse of Mountaineers. By Charles Packe. Second Edition, with Maps &'c. and Ap- pendix. Crozvn Svo. "js. 6d. Hozv to See Norway. By y. R. Campbell. With Map and 5 Woodcuts, fcp. Zvo. 5^-. Untrodden Peaks and Unfrequented Valleys ; a Midsummer Ramble among the Dolomites. By Amelia B. Edwards. With itumerous Illustrations. 2>vo, 21s. The Alpine Club Map of S'witzerla7td, with parts of the Neighbouring Cotcn- tries, on the scale of four miles to an Inch. Edited by R. C Nichols, ES.A. KR.G.S. In Four Sheets, in Portfolio, 42J. or mounted in a Case, 52^. dd. Each Sheet may be had separately, price 1 2s. or mounted iii a Case, \<^s. The Alpine Guide. By John Ball, M.R.I. A. late President of the Alpine Club. Post Svo. with Maps and other Illustrations. Eastern Alps, Price \os. 6d. Central Alps, including all the Oder land District, Price 7J-. dd. Western Alps, including Mont Blanc, Monte Rosa, Zermatt, &c. Price ds. 6d. Introduction on Alpine Travelling in general, and 'on the Geology of the Alps. Price \s. Either of the Three Volu?nes or Parts of the ^Alpine Guide ^ may be had with this Introduction prefixed, is. extra. Visits to Remarkable Places, and Scenes illns- trative of striking Passages ' in English History and Poetry. By William Howitt. 2 Tols. Svo. Woodcuts, 2 5 J. 34 NEW WORKS PUBLISHED BY LONGMANS & CO. V/ORKS of FICTION. Whispers from Fairy- land, By the RL Hon. E. H. Knatchbtdl - Hzigessen, M.P. Author of ' Stories for my Children' ' Moon- shine^ ' Queer Folk! &c. With 9 lllustratio7ts from Original De- signs engraved on Wood by G. Pear- son. Crown Svo. price ds. Elena, an Italian Fale. By L. N. Corny n, 2 vols, post 2>vo. 1 45". La dy Wi llo ugh by ' s Diary during the Reign of Charles the First, the Pro- tectorate, and the Restora- tion. Craion Svo. 'js. 6d. Cenlulle, a Fale of Pan. By Denys Shyne Law lor, Atithor of * Pilgrimages in the Pyrenees and Landes! Croivn Svo. los. 6d. The Folk-Lore of Rome, collected by Word of Mouth from the People. By R. H. Busk, Author of * The Valleys of TiroP &c. Crown %vo. \2s. 6d. Cyllene ; or, The Fall of Paganism. By Henry Sneyd, M.A. 1 vols, pos %vo. 14J. Fales of the Teutonic Lands. By Rev. G. W. Cox, M.A. and E. H. Jones. Crown Svo. los. 6d. Becker s Gallus; or Ro- man Scenes of the Time of Atigusttts. Post Zvo. *js. 6d. Becker's Charicles : Il- lustrative of Private Life of the Ancient Greeks, Post Svo. Js. 6d. Tales of Ancient Greece, By the Rev. G. W. Cox, M.A, Croivn Svo. 6s. 6d. The Modern Novelisfs Library. Atherstone Priory, 2s. boards ; 2s. 6d. cloth. The Burgomaster'' s Family, 2s. boards; 2s. 6d. cloth. Melvili.e's Digby Grand, 2s. and 2s. 6d. Gladiators, 2s. and 2s.6d. Good for Nothing,2s. 6-'"2J-. ()d. Hohnby House, 2s. and 2s. 6d. Interpreter, 2s. and 2s. 6d. ITate Coventry, 2s. and 2s. 6d. QueeiUs Maries, 2s. and 2s. 67. General Bounce, 2s. and2s. 6d. Trollope's Warden, is. 6d. and 2s. Barchester Towers, 2s. and 2s. 6d. Bramley-Moore's Six Sisters of the Val- leys, 2s. boards ; 2s. 6d cloth. NEW WORKS PUBLISHED BY LONGMANS & CO. Novels and Tales, By the Right Hon, Benja- min Disraeli, M.P. Cabinet Editions^ complete in Ten Volumes^ crown Svo. 6s. each^ as follows : — Lothair, 6s. Coningsby, 6s. Sybil, 6s. Tancred, 6s. Venetia, 6s. Alroy^/xiojt, ^'c. 6s. Young Duke, &=c. 6s. Vivian Grey, 6s. Henrietta Temple, 6s. Contarini Meming, ^c. 6s. Cabinet Edition, in crown Svo. of Stories and Tales by Miss Sewell : — Amy Herbert, 2s. 6d. Gertrude, 2s. 6d. EarFs Daughter, 2s. 6d. Experience of Life, 2s. 6d. Cleve Hall, 2s. 6d. Ursula Ivors, 2s. 6d. Katharine Ashton, 2s. 6d. Margaret Percival, y. 6d. Land on Parsonage, y. 6d. is. 6d. POETRY and THE DRAMA. Ballads and Lyrics of Old France; with other Poems. By A. Lang. Square fcp. Zvo. <^s. Moore s Lai I a Rookh, TennieVs Edition, zvith 68 Wood Engravings. Fcp. 4to. 21 s. Moore s Irish Melodies, Maclise s Edition^ with i6i Steel Plates. Super-royal %vo. ^is. 6d. Miniature Edition of Moore s Irish Melodies, with Maclises i6i Illus- trations reduced in Litho- graphy. Lmp \6mo. \os. 6d. Miltons Lycidas and Epitaphiitm Da7nonis. Edited, with Notes and Introduction, by C. S. J err am, M.A. Croivn Svo. y. 6d. Lays of Ancient Rome ; with Ivry and the Ar- mada. By the Right Hon. Lord Macaulay. \6mo. y. 6d. Lord Macattlays Lays of Ancient Rome. With 90 Illustrations on Wood from Drawings by G. Scharf. Fcp. 4to. 21s. Miniature Edition of Lord Macaulay s Lays of Ancient Rome, with Scharf s 90 Illustrations reduced in Lithography. Imp. \6mo. \Os. 6d. Southeys Poetical IVorks with the Atithors last Cor- rections and Additions. Medium Zvo. with Portrait, \\s. Bowdlers Family Shak- spcare, cheaper Genuire Edition. Complete in i vol. medium Svo. large type, tuith 36 Woodctit Illustrations, lAfS. or in 6 vols. fcp. Svo. price 2 is. 36 NEW WORKS PUBLISHED BY LONGMANS & CO. Horatii Opera, Library < Edition, with English Notes, 'Marginal References and various Readings. ' Edited by Rev.J , E, Yonge. Svo. 2IS. The yEneid of Virgil Translated into English Verse. By y. Coning ton, M,A, Crown Szfo. gs. Poems by yean Ingelow, 2 vols. Fcp. Svo. los. First Series, containing ^ Divided ^^ * The Star's Monument,'' ^c. l6th Thousand. Fcp. Svo. ^s. Second Series, 'A Story of Doom,^ * Gla- dys and her Island,^ 6^r. <^th Thousand. Fcp. Svo. 5 J. Poems by yean Ingelow. First Series, zvith nearly I oo Woodcut Ilhcstrations. Fcp. dfto. 2\s. RURAL SPORTS, HORSE and MANAGEMENT, &c. CATTLE Down the Road ; or, Reminiscejtces of a Gentle- man Coachman. By C. T. S. Birch Rey- nardson. With Twelve Chromolithographic Illustra- tions from Original Paintings by H. Aiken. Medium Svo. [Nearly ready, Blaine s Encyclopcedia of Rural Sports; Complete Accounts, Historical, Prac- tical, and Descriptive, of Hunting, Shooting, Fish- ing, Racing, &c. With above 6oo Woodcuts {20 from Designs <5^ John Leech). Svo. 2\s. A Book on Angling: a Treatise on the A^^t of Angling in every branch, including full Illustrated Lists of Salmon Flies. By Francis Francis. Post Svo. Portrait and Plates, 15^. Wilcockss Sea -Fisher- man : comprising the Chief Methods of Hook and Line Fishing, a glance at Nets, and remarks on Boats and Boating. New Edition^ with 80 Woodcuts. Post Svo. I2J-. dd. The Ox, his Diseases and their Treatment ; with an Essay o?t Parturition in the Cow. By y. R. Dob son, ^ Memb. R.C.V.S. Crown Svo. with Illustrations, *js. 6d. A Treatise on Horse- Shoeing and Lameness. By y. Gamgee, Vet. Surg. Svo. with 55 Woodcuts, \qs. 6d. Yoitatt on the Horse. Revised and enlarged by W. Watson, M.R.C.V.S. Svo. Woodcuts, I2s. 6d. NEW WORKS PUBLISHED BY LONGMANS & CO. 37 Youatfs Work on the Dog, revised and enlarged. Svo. IVoodcuis^ 6s. Horses and Stables. By Colonel F. Fitzwygram, XV. the Kings Hussars. With 24 Plates of Illustrations. Svo. 10s. 6d. The Dog in Health and Disease. By Stonehenge. With 73 Wood Engravings. Square crown %vo. Is. 6d. The Greyhound. By Stonehenge. Revised Edition, with 24 Portraits of Grey- hounds. Square crown Svo. los. 6d. Stables and Stable Fit- tings. By W. Miles, Esq. Imp. Svo. -with 13 Plates, \<^s. The Horses Foot, and how to keep it Sound. By W. Miles, Esq. Ninth Edition, ItnJ>. Svo. Woodcuts, 12s. 6d. A Plain Treatise on Horse-shoeing. By W. Miles, Esq. Sixth Edition. Post Svo. Woodcuts, 2s. 6d. Remarks on Horses Teeth, addressed to Pur- chasers. By W. Miles, Esq. Post Svo. \s. 6d. The Fly-Fisher s Ento- mology. By Alfred Ronalds. With coloured Representa- tions of the Natural and Artificial Insect. With 20 coloured Plates. Svo. la^s. The Dead Shot, or Sports- mans Complete Guide; a Treatise on the Use of the Gtcn, Dog-breaking, Pigeon- shooting, &c. By Marksman. Fcp. Svo. with Plates, ^s. 38 NE/V WORKS PUBLISHED BY LONGMANS 8c CO, WORKS of UTILITY and GENERAL INFORMATION. Maunder s Treasury of Knowledge and Libraiy of Refere7ice ; comprismg an E7iglish Dictionary and Grammar, Universal Ga- zetteer, Classical Diction- ary, Ckro7Zology, Law Dic- tionary, Synopsis of the Peerage, Useful Tables,&c. Fcp. Sz'o. 6s. Maunder s Biographical Treasury. Latest Edition, reco7t- structed and partly re- written, with aboict i,ooo additiofial Memoirs, by W, L. R. Gates. Fcp. Zvo. 6s. Maunders Scientific and Literacy Treasury; a Popular Encyclopccdia of Science, Literature, a7td A7^t. New Editio7i, 171 part re- W7'itte7i, with above i ,ooo new articles, by f . Y. yoh7iso7i. Fcp. %vo. 6s. Maunder s Treasury of Geog7^aphy, Physical, His- torical, Descriptive, and Political. Edited by W. Htighes, F.R.G.S. With 7 Maps and 1 6 Plates. Fcp. %vo. 6s. Ma^mders Historical Treastc7y ; Ge7tc7^al l7itro- dticto7y Outli7ies of Uni- versal Histo7y, a7id a Se7Hes of Separate His- tories. Revised by the Rev. G. W. Cox, M.A. Fcp. Svo. 6s. Maunders Treasury of ]SlattL7^alHisto7y ; or Popu- lar Dictio7ia7y of Zoology. Revised and corrected Edition. Fcp. 2>z>o. zuith 900 Woodcuts, 6s. The Treasury of Bible Ktiow ledge ; bei7ig a Dic- tio7iary of the Books, Pe7^- S07ts, Ptaces, Eve7its, and other Matters of which mcTition is made i7i Holy Scripture. By Rev. J. Ay re, M.A. With Maps, 1 5 Plates, and mwierous Wood- cuts. Fcp. 2)V0. 6s. Collieries and Colliers : a Ha7idbook of the Law a7id Leadifig Cases relat- ifig thereto. By y. C. Fowler. Third Edition. Fcp. Svo. ys. 6d. The Theory and Prac- tice of BankiTtg. By H. D. Macleod, M.A, Second Edition. 2 vols. Svo. ^os. NEW WORKS PUBLISHED BY LONGMANS & CO. 39 Modem Cooke7y for Pri- vate Families^ rediued to a System of Easy Practice ift a Series of carefully-tested Receipts. By Eliza Acton, With 8 Plates ^ 1 50 Woodcuts. Fcp. Svo. 6s. A Practical Treatise on Brewing ; with FormulcB for Public Brewers^ and InstrjLctions for Private Families, By W, Black, Fifth Edition. Svo. los. 6d. Three Hundred Original Chess Problems and Studies, By Jas. Pierce, M.A, and W. T, Pierce, With many Diagrams. Sq. fcp. Zvo. ^s. 6d. Suppieme7it, 2s. 6d. Chess Openings, By F, W, Longman, Bal- liol College, Oxford, Second Edition^ revised. Fcp. Svo. 2s. 6d. The Theory of the Mo- dem Scientific Game of Whist, By W, Pole, F,R,S, Fifth Edition. Fcp. Svo. 2$. 6d. The Cabinet Lawyer ; a Popidar Digest of the Laws of England, Civil, Crimi- nal, and Constitutional. Twenty-fourth Edition, corrected and ex- tended. Fcp. Svo. 9J-. Blacks tone Economised ; being a Compendiztm of the Laws of England to the Present Time. By D, M, Aird, Barrister. Revised Edition. Post Svo. Is. 6d. Pewtners Comprehensive Specifier ; a Guide to the Practical Specification of every kind of Bzdlding- Artificers Work, Edited by W, . Yoimg, CroTivn Svo. 6s. I/ints to Mothers on the Management of their Health during the Period of Preg7iancy and in the Lying-in Roo?n. By Thomas Btdl, M.D. Fcp. Svo. 5^. The Maternal Manage- ment ofChildreji in Health and Disease, By Thomas Btdl, M,D, Fcp. Svo. 5j. 40 NEW WORKS PUBLISHED BY LONGMANS & CO. KNO^VLEDGE for the YOUNG. The Stepping-Stone to Know- ledge; or upwards of ^oo Questions and Answers on Miscellafieous Subjects^ adapted to the capacity of Infant minds. \%mo. is. Second Series of the Stepping- ^tone to Knowledge: Containing upwards of 2>oo QuestioJis aiid Answers on Miscellafieous Subjects not contained in the First Series. iSmo. IS. The Stepping-Stone to Geo- graphy : Containing several Hun- dred Questions and Answers on Geographical Subjects. \%mo. is. The Stepping-Stone to Eng- lish History; Questions a7id An- swers on the History of Ejiglajid. iSmo. IS. The Stepping-Stone to Bible Knowledge; Questions and An- swers on the Old and New Testa- ments. iSmo, is. The Stepping-Stone to Bio- graphy; Questions and Answers on the Lives of Eminent Men and Womefi. i^mo. is. The Stepping-Stone to Irish History : Containing several Hun- dred Questiofis and Ajiswers on the History of Ireland. iSmo. is. The Stepping-Stone to French History: Containing several Hun- dred Questions and Answers on the History of Fi-ance. iSmo. is. The Stepping-Stone to Roman History : Containing several Hun- dred Questions and Answers on the History of Ro7ne. iSmo. IS. The Stepping- Stone to Grecian History: Containing several Hun- dred Questions and A7isiuers on the History of Greece. iSmo. IS. The Stepping-Stone to Eng- lish Grammar : Containing seve- ral Hmdred Questions and A71- swers on English Grammar. i%mo. is. The Stepping-Stone to French Prontinciation and Conversation : Containing several Hundred Questions and Answers. iSmo. IS. The Stepping-Stone to Astro- nomy : Containing several Hm- dred familiar' Questions and Answers on the Eai'th and the Solar and Stellar Systems. iSmo. is. The Stepping-Stone to Music: Containing several Hundred Questions on the Science; also a short History of Music. iSmo. IS. The Stepping-Stone to Natu- ral History : Vertebrate or Back- boned Animals. Part I. Mam- malia; Part II. Birds J Reptiles, Fishes. iSmo. is. each Part. The Stepping-Stone to Archi- tecture; Questio7is and Answers explaining the Principles and Progress of Architecture from the Earliest Times. With 100 Woodcuts. iSmo. is. INDEX. Acton's Modem Cookery 39 A irds Blackstone Economised 39 Alpine Club Map of Switzerland 33 Alpine Guide (The) 33 Amos 5 Jurisprudence 10 Primer of the Constitution 10 A ndersons Strength of Materials 20 Armstrong' s Oxg2imQ. QhQm\%\.xy 20 Arnold's (Dr.) Christian Life 29 '- Lectures on Modern History 2 Miscellaneous Works 12 School Sermons 29 Sermons 29 (T, ) Manual of English Literature 1 2 Arnoulds Life of Lord Denman 7 Atherstone Priory 39 Autumn Holidays of a Country Parson ... 13 Ayre's Treasury of Bible Knowledge 38 5«f5«'j Essays, by Whaiely 10 Life and Letters, by 5/^i/^/«^ ... 10 Works 10 Bain's Mental and Moral Science 11 on the Senses and Intellect 11 Bakers Two Works on Ceylon 32 5a//'j Guide to the Central Alps 38 Guide to the Western Alps 38 Guide to the Eastern Alps 38 Becker's Charicles and Gallus 34 ^/ar/&'j Treatise on Brewing 39 Blackley's German-English Dictionary 15 Blaine's Rural Sports 36 Bloxam's Metals 20 Boultbee on 39 Articles 28 Bourne's Catechism of the Steam Engine . 27 Handbook of Steam Engine 27 * Treatise on the Steam Engine ... 27 Improvements in the same 27 Bawdier s Family Shakspeare 35 Bramhy-Moore s Six Sisters of the Valley . 39 Brande's Dictionary of Science, Literature, and Art 22 Bray's Manual of Anthropology 22 Philosophy of Necessity 11 ^r/w/^/^y'^ Astronomy 17 Browne's Exposition of the 39 Articles 28 Bruner s lAie oi Brunei 7 Buckle's History of Civilisation 3 Posthumous Remains 12 Bull's Hints to Mothers 39 Maternal Management of Children . 39 Burgomaster's Family (The) 39 Burke's Rise of Great Families 8 Vicissitudes of Families 8 Busk's Folk-lore of Rome 34 Valleys of Tirol 33 Cabinet Lawyer 39 Campbell' s NorNB-Y 33 Gates' s Biographical Dictionary 8 and Woodward's Encyclopaedia ... 5 Changed Aspects of Unchanged Truths ... 13 Chesney's Indian Pohty 3 Modem Military Biography 3 Waterloo Campaign 3 dough's Lives from Plutarch 4 Colenso on Moabite Stone &c 32 's Pentateuch and Book of Joshua. 32 Speaker's Bible Commentary ... 32 Collins s Mineralogy of Comwall 27 Perspective 26 Commonplace Philosopher in Town and Country, by A. K. H. B 13 Comte's Positive Polity 8 Comyn's Elena 34 Congreves Essays 9 Politics of Aristotle 10 Conington's Translation of Virgil's ^neid 36 Miscellaneous Writings 14 C<7«/'««jm«'j Two French Dictionaries ... 14 Conybeare and Howson's Life and Epistles of St. Paul 29 Cotton's Memoir and Correspondence 7 Counsel and Comfort from a City Pulpit... 13 Cox's (G. W.) Aryan Mythology 4 Crusades 6 • History of Greece 4 Tale of the Great Persfan War 4 Tales of Ancient Greece ... 34 and Jones's Teutonic Tales 34 Crawley's Thucydides 4 Creasy on British Constitution 3 Cresy's Encyclopaedia of Civil Engineering 27 Critical Essays of a Country Parson 14 Crookes's Chemical Analysis 24 Dyeing and Calico-printing 28 Culley's Handbook of Telegraphy 26 Cusack's Student's History of Ireland 3 D'Aubignfs Reformation in the Time of Calvin 6 44 NEW WORKS PUBLISHED BY LONGMANS & CO. Eoget's Thesaurus of English Words and Phrases 14 Ronald's Fly-Fisher's Entomology 37 Rothschild's Israelites 30 ^«jj(?// on the Christian Religion 6 ■ English Constitution 2 ' 's Recollections and Suggestions ... 2 5d!«^arj'j Justinian's Institutes ^ 10 ^a«/»r^'j English Kings 2 Savory's Geometric Turning 26 Schellen's Spectrum Analysis 18 Scott' s A\hev\. Durer 24 Papers on Civil Engineering 28 Seaside Musing, by A. K. H. B 13 Seebohms Oxford Reformers of 1498 3 Protestant Revolution 6 Sewell's History of the Early Church 5 Passing Thoughts on Religion 31 Preparation for Communion 31 Principles of Education 14 Readings for Confirmation 31 Readings for Lent 31 Examination for Confirmation ... 31 Stories and Tales 35 Thoughts for the Age 31 Thoughts for the Holy Week 31 Sharp's Post-office Gazetteer 16 Shelley's Workshop Appliances 20 5/^<7r/'j Church History 5 Simpson's Meeting the Sun 32 Smith's Paul's Voyage and Shipwreck 30 {Sydney) Essays 12 Life and Letters 7 Miscellaneous Works ... 12 Wit and Wisdom 12 (Dr. R. A.) Air and Rain 18 Sneyds Cyllene 34 Southeys Doctor 13 — Poetical Works 35 Stanley's History of British Birds 21 Stephen's Ecclesiastical Biography 7 Freethinking and Plainspeaking 9 Stepping Stones (the Series) 40 Stirling' s ^QCXQioi HegeX 11 Sir William Hamilton n Stonehenge on the Dog 37 on the Greyhound 37 Sunday Afternoons at the Parish Church of a University City, by A. K. H. B 13 Supernatural Religion 31 7t7y/(?r'j History of India 3 Manual of Ancient History 6 Manual of Modern History 6 [Jeremy) VJor\iS, cdxi^dhy Eden. 31 Tevt-Books of Science 19 7 A/r/eya//' J History of Greece 4 Thomson' s'LscvfZoi'ThovighX 11 Thorpe's Quantitative Analysis 20 and Muir's Qualitative Analysis ... 20 Thudichum: s Q\i&ci\\c.2XV\iy%\o\ogy 23 Todd ( A. ) on Parliamentary Government ... 2 and Bowman's Anatomy and Physiology of Man 24 Trench's Realities of Irish Life 12 Trollope's Barchester Towers 39 Warden 39 Tyndall's American Lectures on Light ... 20 Belfast Address 19 Diamagnetism 20 Fragments of Science 19 Hours of Exercise in the Alps... 33 Lectures on Electricity 20 Lectures on Light 20 Lectures on Sound 20 Heat a Mode of Motion 20 Molecular Physics 20 C/(?^^/-w^^'j System of Logic 11 Ure's Dictionary of Arts, Manufactures, and Mines 27 Warlurtoji s Edward the Third 6 Watson's Geometry 20 Watts' s Dictionary of Chemistry 24 Webb's Objects for Common Telescopes ... 18 Weinhola's Experimental Physics 19 Wellington's Life, by Gleig 8 Whately's English Synonymes 14 Life and Correspondence 6 Logic 10 Rhetoric 10 White and Donkin's Enghsh Dictionary... 15 and Riddle's Latin Dictionaries ... 15 Whitworth on Guns and Steel 27 Wilcockss Sea-Fisherman 36 Williams's Ax\%\.o\\€s> Ethics 10 Willis's Principles of Mechanism 26 Willoughby's (Lady) Diary 34 Wood's Bible Animals 22 Homes without Hands 21 Insects at Home 21 Insects Abroad 21 Out of Doors 21 Strange Dwellings 21 F(9«^^'j English-Greek Lexicons 16 Horace 36 Youatt on \he "Dog 37 on the Horse 36 Z^/Z^/j Socrates 5 Stoics, Epicureans, and Sceptics... 5 Spottiswoode <5r* Co., Printers, New-street Square, LoMdoM. ^< 14 DAY USE RETURN TO DESK FROM WHICH BORROWED LOAN DEPT. RENEWALS ONLY— TEL. NO. 642^405 This book is due on the last date stamped below, or on the date to which renewed. Renewed books are subjea to immediate recall. JIM I0«9l7 IRECD LD 1 7,!Jf.f^^^¥B- ---lsS'"'^"'= A r^ A / ^ 7M-0