xss- jb ; LATIN GRAMMAR. LONDON : PRINTED BY SPOTTIS\VOODE AND CO., NEW-STREET SQUARE AND PARLIAMENT STREET THE PUBLIC SCHOOL LATIN GRAMMAR FOR THE USE OF SCHOOLS, COLLEGES, AND PRIVATE STUDENTS. BY BENJAMIN HALL KENNEDY, D.D. REGIUS PROFESSOR OF GREEK IN THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE, AND CANON OF ELY. Nihil ex grammatica nocuerit nisi quod super-vacuum e:~t ; neque enim chstant hae disciplinae per illas euntibus, sed circa illas haerentibus. QUINTIL. Inst. Orat. lib. i. cap. iv LONDON : LONGMANS, GREEN, AND CO. 1879. PREFACE TO THE FIFTH EDITION. i. BY AN AGREEMENT between the Proprietors and Mr. John Peile, Fellow and Tutor of Christ's College, Cambridge, it is arranged that the ' Public School Latin Grammar/ with the books akin to it, shall hereafter be revised by Mr. Peile as joint and, in due time, sole Editor. Mr. Peile's merits as a classical and Sanskrit scholar, and as an able teacher, are widely known. Those who have the advantage of nearer acquaintance with him will be assured that the maintenance and improvement of these books, as means of public instruction, could not be placed in safer keeping. 2. The First Edition of this Grammar, published in January 1871, was introduced by the following Preface : 1 The " Public School Latin Grammar " is simply a develop- ment of the Primer, in conformity with the design of those, who, after accepting the latter book, entrusted to the same Editor the preparation of the former. The difference between the elementary compendium and the higher work is such as might be justly expected. Whilst the general principles and many of the paradigms are in both the same, in the Grammar the subject-matter is arranged more systematically, the body of examples very much increased, the illustration wider, and a large amount of information is added, which in the Primer does not appear at all. 342455 vi Preface. i Yet a Grammar of this size does not profess to be an exhaus- tive treatise on its subject. Competent and careful students, who combine its use with the reading of authors and the prac- tice of composition, so as to master its contents, ought indeed to become Latin scholars of considerable width and power; but they will still find much to learn in the field of Latin, which must be gathered from special monographies by eminent scholars, some of whom are occasionally cited in the following pages. 'At the present time, when the science of Comparative Philology has made such advance, that good living scholars know far more of the history and organism of the Latin lan- guage than was known to Quintilian and the old grammarians, the publication of a Higher Latin Grammar, without reference to the facts and principles of that science, would be a retro- gressive and senseless act. It must, however, be remembered that the chief end and aim of a Classical Latin Grammar is, to impress upon the minds of students the forms and construc- tions found in classical authors. Its office, therefore, is to use Comparative Philology as a guide and auxiliary in teaching Latin, not to teach Comparative Philology itself through the medium of Latin. This principle has been kept in view by the Editor throughout his work. The just mean is always hard to observe j but he may venture to say that he has not strayed from it wilfully. In the Appendix, indeed, and in a few other places, he has thought it not inexpedient to cite some of the most important affinities between Latin and other Aryan languages and dialects ; but only with a view to point the path of future study, not to furnish the student with a sufficient knowledge of the several subjects there noticed/ 3. The following passages are taken from the Preface to the Second Edition, published in 1874 : * Competent and candid critics are aware that a book of this size, in spite of its title, is not meant for school use in the same sense as the Primer and other lesson- books of a similar kind. As a school-book (for there is no limit to its use by any students who are capable of good private reading) masters can use it in two ways : (i) by enforcing general or occasional reference to its principles and rules in reading Latin authors ; Preface. vii (2) by requiring definite portions to be prepared for periodical examinations conducted on paper as well as orally. 1 The present opportunity has been used to enlarge and improve several departments of the Grammar, especially those of Soundlore and Derivation. To discuss the physiology of articulate sound has never entered into my plan. Were I competent to undertake this, which is not the case, I should hardly deem it suited to a book applying specially to Latin, but rather appropriate to a more general work treating of the Prolegomena to. Grammar. t On the other hand, I have striven to bring out somewhat more prominently than before the leading facts of Comparative Philology, soxfar as they concern three kindred languages Latin, Greek, and Sanskrit. The Sanskrit words in this Edition are generally cited in their modern form. The term Primitive Root is, however, used; in what sense, and by what right, ap- pears in a Supplementary Note at the close of the Appendix. ' As I am now, by the kindness of those whom I was bound to consult, authorised to attach my name to this Pre- face, I think it right to notice the chief objections made to the books on Latin Grammar with which I have been occupied. ' When the Primer was published, seven years ago, it was right that it should be criticised, and certain that it would be impugned ; nor could we expect that all criticism would be equally candid and intelligent, or that every assailant would choose his weapons from the armories of truth and reason only. ' The chief objection urged against the Primer was this : that it was too abstract and difficult for the use of children beginning Latin. There would have been some weight in this argument, if the purpose of the book had been rightly de- scribed. But it was really designed as a class-book, not for Elementary Schools and First Forms, but for all Forms in Public Schools below the grade of those boys who could pass with advantage to the use of a fuller Grammar. Other com- panion books were in preparation for the instruction of children at home or under private care ; and these have since been published. ' It was, secondly, stated as a charge against the Primer, and subsequently against this Grammar (in which the teaching of the Primer is contained), that they " bristle with new, hard, and . viii Preface. uninviting terms." This charge, urged as it has been with much persistence, and little concern for truth, must now be met by some remarks on the terminology of Grammar, together with a statement of my own feelings and practice in regard to it. 4. c Every science must have its own terminology. Grammar is a science; and in Latin Grammar, as one of its departments, there exist, I believe, more than three hundred technical terms. Most of these are either actually Greek words, as Syntax^ Prosody, &c., or translated from Greek into Latin, as the names of the Cases and Parts of Speech. Others are purely Latin, as Gerund, Supine, Active, Passive Voice. Of these various terms, whatever the original unfitness of some, the larger number have struck their roots in literature so deeply and widely that any attempt to extirpate them would be quixotic. Many, indeed, are in themselves unmeaning or inadequate (as Gerund, Supine, Deponent, Accusative, Genitive, Ablative); but the learner by gradual experience is enabled to use them practically, which is after all the end we wish to reach, though the road to it might at several points have been improved. A few terms, which are not only vicious, but really confusing, and at the same time unessential, I have exchanged for better substitutes. Among those so rejected are Neuter Verb, Neutropassiva, Neutralia Passiva, Substantive Verb. Again, we find a considerable number of cumbersome Greek terms (Heteroclita, Heterogenea, Aptota, Diptota, Triptota, Tetraptota, with many of the names given to what are called Figures of Speech), which are of little use to learners. These may either be omitted, or, at least, dismissed to some unconspicuous corner. 'This statement affords ample proof that no disposition existed to place in the student's hands a Grammar, " bristling with hard and uninviting terms/' though it is not unnatural to ask what those " inviting" terms are which, like the "crustula" of the "blandi doctores " in Horace's time, have magic power enough to attract young learners, " elementa velint ut discere prima." 6 But there is one important truth which many would-be critics either ignore or forget. Grammar is not only a science, but a science capable of constant improvement; and improve- ment in science usually brings with it some change in termino- logy, or some addition to it. Now, in every division of Grammar, Soundlore, Wordlore, Syntax, and Prosody, vast Preface. ix strides have been made in this century through the fruitful labours of scholars, chiefly German, some English ; whom I would gladly recount here, were I not afraid of omitting some name or names from so large a list. Accordingly it will be found by those who study the works to which I allude, that the terminology in each division has been more or less modified, more or less enriched. 5. ( As respects my own contributions to Latin Grammar, in the treatment of Soundlore and Wordlore I claim little origi- nality. If I have compiled judiciously and correctly from the works of great comparative philologers, so as to explain and illustrate usefully the received facts of Latin word-formation, I shall be amply satisfied with such credit. Again, in the Prosody of this Grammar I have no share beyond the Table of Metres and one of the Notes on Metre, containing little more than tabular enumeration. The rest I owe to the kindness of my friend Mr. Munro, whose recognised eminence as a scholar needs no praise from me to enhance it. ' But the Analysis of Sentences (Simple and Compound) which constitutes the Syntax of this book, has been, to a great extent, the fruit of personal study, personal thought, personal labour. Sketched out in the Syntax of my " Elementary Latin Grammar," it is filled in, though far from reaching the fullness of perfection, in the present Grammar. 6 1 speak from long personal experience when I say that any capable mind, which has fully mastered the principles of those pages (348-500, especially 348-359 and 434-500), will be able, in reading any part. of Horace, Cicero, Livy, or Tacitus, to move through their longest periods with a firm intellectual step, realising, and, if need be, stating the raison cT&re of every constructed word, especially (for this is the most crucial test) the raison d'etre of mood and tense in every Subjunctive Verb. The same mind, so prepared, and applying itself to write Latin, will be free from the risk of using any wrong construction. Not that the mastery of a grammatical Syntax alone will give the student stylistic power and skill in composition. These belong to the vis divinior, to inspiration drawn by a gifted nature from the study of the best Latin authors themselves. To such study, combined with practice, no scholar will hesitate to assign by far the largest share in the formation of a good style whether of prose or of poetry. But, in the course of reading, the student x Preface. cannot afford to neglect any valuable help ; and of all appli- ances none is so valuable, none so indispensable, as a sound, well-arranged, and lucid Grammar. 6. ' The study of any language with its grammar contains more or less, according to the character of the language chosen, the study of every language and its grammar, the study of language in general and its grammar. The Greek and Latin languages (illustrated by their sister, the Sanskrit) are best adapted for this purpose, because their forms and constructions, themselves grand, are fixed in two grand literatures. One who studies these languages and their grammars cannot help studying to a great extent, coordinately with them, his or her own native language and its grammar. And the best mode and course of study will be that which is so conducted as to make such co- ordination as effectual and as widely instructive as possible. The principal reason why translation into Greek and Latin Verse as well as Prose deserves to be retained in the practice of classical instruction I hold to be this, that it is a valu- able exercise in the acquirement not only of those two dead languages, but of the learner's native living language at the same time. 7. ' A book like the " Public School^ Latin Grammar " does not pretend to exhaust the subjects of which it treats subjects on which many large volumes may be, and have been, written but it carries the student very far on his road, and points and smooths the path of future acquirement. 8. ' I return to speak of my Latin Syntax, by which alone, so far as I know, my works on Grammar have obtained the favour and confidence of eminent scholars engaged in public instruction. ' The treatment of Latin Syntax has in the present century passed through a revolution scarcely less considerable than the treatment of Etymology. * The means by which this revolution has been wrought are : (i) the application to the whole doctrine of Syntax of the cor- relative logical terms Subject- Predicate and Subject- Object, with the principles they imply ; (2) the distinction between the Simple and Compound Sentence, and between the several kinds of each, with the consecution of tenses in them ; (3) the distinction between Oratio Recta and Oratio Obliqua, with the various affections which clauses subordinate to Oratio Obliqua receive. Preface. xi 'We owe to the perspicacity and learned labours of various writers, chiefly German, the reforms made in Latin Syntax. I cannot assign to each his due share. The Grote- fends. Kriiger, Zumpt, O. Schulz, Ram shorn, Kiihner, Madvig, Key, have each their special merits. Of these I place Raphael Kiihner in the first rank ; and I am much indebted to Grieben's " Lateinische Satzverbindungen." In our own country the scholastic study of this part of Grammar was usefully promoted by the Exercise-books of T. Kerchever Arnold. 6 These reforms brought into the teaching of Latin Syntax, besides the terms already named, a certain number more, per- haps from forty to fifty, including the names given to the seve- ral varieties of the Simple and Compound Sentence, with their subdivisions ; including also the terms Protasis and Apodosis in sentences which, like the Conditional, take these parts. 9. ' As regards the new terms which my own improvements have suggested, three alone have frequent and important prac- tical use ; the value of which I insist on as very great. These are, (i) Prolative (Infinitive) ; (2) Copulative Verbs, introduced first in my " Elementary Grammar"; (3) Suboblique (clause or verb), a convenient abridgment of the necessary phrase " Subordinate to Oratio Obliqua." ' Further, it appeared that the doctrine of copulative predi- cation in Grammar required, for its clear statement, the use of some terminology from which the term predicate itself should be excluded ; and this was at length found in the term used by Mr. C. P. Mason, (predicative) Complement. ' I say then, generally, that a new term proposed in Grammar is not to be condemned because it is new; but, if at all, for one of three reasons : that it is superfluous ; or that it is in- adequate > or because a better term is suggested. As respects myself, I repeat that I have not the least disposition to use hard terms ; and I say that those which I have introduced are unjustly so described. But I cannot adopt the poor pedantry which refuses to facilitate and abridge discourse by the use of suitable terms ; to write, for instance (after due explanation) " Collective Subject" rather than "Nominative Singular of a Substantive which implies a multitude of persons or things " : and " Composite Subject " rather than " two or more singular Nominatives agreeing with one plural Verb." xii Preface. 10. 'My "Elementary Latin Grammar," first published in 1843, obtained, after twenty years, approval so wide, that its circu- lation approached 8,000 copies annually : and, during those years, not a single complaint affecting its terminology was heard either from the public press or from the eminent teachers who used it in their schools. Such attacks broke out when it was adopted as the groundwork of a new school grammar; and their justice may be tested both by this fact, and by comparing the imaginary difficulty imputed to a few new terms in the Primer, with the many and great obstacles existing in its chief predecessor, Lilly's Grammar.' 11. In the Preface to the Third and Fourth Editions certain portions of Syntax were discussed. Those discussions, being of signal importance to the right appreciation of Latin Com- pound Construction, will here be repeated generally: but with partial suppression of some topics and enlargement of others. I. The Doctrine of Predication. 12. This Doctrine is treated ( 100-106) in agreement with the principles now received in air Continental Latin Grammars, and in most Grammars of the English language, but with some slight variations in the mode of treatment. Logic and Grammar are akin to one another ; but their spheres are different. Logic is the Grammar of reasoning : it develops 6 the laws of thought/ Grammar is the Logic of language : it displays the rules and idioms of discourse. The Correlation and the Terms Subject- Predicate are necessary to both sciences. But the scope of these terms is not the same in both. If we take a Simple Sentence, such as ' beneficium male collocatum nocet (noxium est) hominum societati/ we see that the Logical Subject of this proposition is ' beneficium male collocatum/ but the Grammatical Subject of the sentence is ' beneficium,' of which 'male collocatum' is an adjunct. Again, the Logical Predicate is 'noxium/ the Grammatical Predicate ' nocet ' or ' noxium est/ of which ' hominum socie- tati ' is an adjunct. Hence appears the propriety and necessity (if confusion is a thing proper and necessary to be avoided) of distinguishing the terms Subject and Predicate in Grammar by the epithet 'Grammatical.' As for the terms Subject- Preface. xiii Predicate themselves, they have now so firm a footing in the science of Grammar that they cannot be excluded from it, if their exclusion were desirable. See * Predicate ' in Index I. The Subject is 'id quod Praedicato subjectum est' : the Predicate is ' id quod de Subjecto praedicatum est.' The com- bination of the two (as Kiihner says : f Ausfuhrliche Grammatik der Lat. Spr.,' Part iii. i) is rightly called the Predicative Relation, because the Predicate (or Verbal notion) is the kernel of speech, to which the Substantival notion stands in subjection, and is therefore called Subject ; often indeed expressed by the endings of the Verb (am-o, ama-s, &c.). When I was preparing my ( Elementary Latin Grammar ' forty years ago, being in some dread of interference with Logic, I took for my type of simple predication, 'homo est mortalis.' But, when the Primer was compiled in 1866, the four Oxford scholars engaged in that work unanimously held that (in Grammar) Subject and Finite Verb are the true norm (homo moritur), and that Incomplete Predication (of the form homo est mortalis) should be taken afterwards as the large exception. This settled the question then, in accordance (as before noticed) with the practice of all continental writers : and a verdict thus authoritatively and generally pronounced is surely entitled to acceptance. II. Complement (of Predication). 13. This suitable and useful term was first suggested by Mr. C. P. Mason in his ' English Grammar,' to designate that which completes the sense of a Simple Sentence when the verb is one * of incomplete Predication ' (called ' Copulative ' in this Grammar, p. 351). In sentences such as ' homo moritur (est mortalis),' we have seen above that the Grammatical Predicate is (not 4 mortalis,' but) ' moritur ' or ' est mortalis.' Donaldson's expedient, of using the terms ' primary, secondary, tertiary ' predicate, I cannot approve. It confounds confusion, invades the domain of Logic gratuitously, and carries into the rules of Grammar the use of a word (predicate), which, however necessary to the preamble of Syntax, as the correlative of Subject, may be replaced afterwards by the term Finite Verb (or Verb of the Sentence) with great advantage. All confusion is happily avoided by the term f Complement,' which is wide xiv Preface. enough to include every word or phrase capable of completing the construction of a Copulative Verb, whether finite or infinitive. See the Examples on p. 352. III. Relations in the Simple Sentence. 14. Mr. Mason, in his ' English Grammar/ following Becker's ' Organism der Sprache/ treats of the Relations of Words in the Simple Sentence. The ' Public School Latin Grammar ' does the same. One of our critics regards these Relations as ' spurious children of Logic and Grammar/ But he has failed to interpret the procedure rightly. It is as purely grammatical as any procedure can be, which admits (what no grammarian can now exclude) the correlations Subject- Predicate and Subject-Object. Two of Mr. Mason's c Relations/ the Predicative (I.) and the Objective (III.)? are tn e same, in title and extent, as those of this Grammar. His ' Attributive ' Relation contains the Qualitative (II. ), but is more extensive: his * Adverbial' Relation contains the Circumstantive (V.), but is more extensive. Mr. Mason was dealing with English, a language of rare inflexions, using Prepositions in their stead. I deal with Latin, a largely inflected language. But even in English the Genitive should not be merged in the Attributive Relation, and the Dative Case in the Adverbial (Circumstantive): much less in Latin. For, true as it is that numerous instances of the Genitive are attributive in character, and that many Datives might be replaced by Preposition with case (i.e. adverbially) ; still there remain very many examples of each case which cannot be so represented, and this fact, combined with that signal distinction between forms of construction, which merits distinct treatment in Grammar, leads to the conclusion that the Dative and Genitive Cases ought to rank as separate Relations. The Dative is therefore classed here under the 6 Receptive ' (IV.), and the Genitive under the * Proprietive ' Relation (VI.). Relation VI L, that of ' the Prolative Infinitive/ appeared for the first time in the ' Public School Latin Primer.' It com- prises all the instances in which the Infinitive extends (profert) the construction of words capable of being followed in de- pendence by a Copulative Infinitive with Nominative Com- Preface. xv plement. See 180. In the 'Elementary Latin Grammar 7 the Infinitive with some of these Verbs (soleo, possum, &c.) was called Objective ; with others (videor, dicor, &c.) Predi- cative (i.e. complemental). But these shifts never satisfied : for if, in * soleo errare,' the Infinitive is Object of ' soleo,' it is an unique Object : and if, in ( videor errare,' the Infinitive is predi- catively complemental (which in some sense it is), its character as a ' Complement' is widely distinct from that of an Adjective or Substantive (which qualify the Subject), and from every other instance in p. 352. And how, on the same principle, can we analyse without the most unpleasant confusion such sentences as these? Marcus putatur velle fieri philosophus. Sapientis est velle fieri doctiorem. At length a conviction was reached, that this usage of Grammar (common to all Aryan languages at least) deserves separate classification as a specialty of the Infinitive Verb-noun. Madvig's mode of treating this construction is not essentially different in principle. Under one head ( 180) this Grammar gives what he sets forth in three places ( 389, 393, 400). He treats in one and the same chapter of the Infinitive in Oratio Recta and Oratio Obliqua. Deeming it right and important to keep Simple and Compound Construction apart, we consider in Chapter III. the Infinitive of Oratio Recta, in Chapter IV. that of Oratio Obliqua. But when Madvig speaks of the Infinitive as joined to these (extensible) Verbs 'urn den Begriff zu erganzen und die Handlung zu ergeben ' (to complete the idea and supply the action), this is exactly what is meant by the Prolative Relation of the Infinitive : and it is very much the same as the use of the Infinitive, in German and English, with those Verbs which some grammarians have very inade- quately called ' auxiliary' (ich will, soil, kann, muss, &c. kommen : I will shall can must, &c. come) . The con- struction belongs also to French, a Romance (latinistic) language. For though French inflects (with Latin) / will come, I would come, by 'je viendrai, je viendrais,' it falls in with Latin, German, English, in saying je peux je veux je de'sire j'ose, &c. venir. It is unquestionably true that after many of these Verbs the Infinitive may be called an Object by anybody who wishes to do so, as in 'vincere scis, tu sais vaincre,' * cupis abire, tu de'sires partir,' &c. The use of the xvi Preface. Verb-noun as an Object is recognised in 179. But the reasons in favour of accepting a distinct Relation wherever the test of ( esse/ &c. with Nominative will apply are decidedly preponderant. If an example be adduced like this in Horace, C. i. 2: hie magnos potius triumphos hie ames did pater atque princeps, and if it be asked whether, as triumphos is Object of ames, did does not also stand in the same construction, the reply is that Latin writers, especially poets, often construct one Verb with dependence of two kinds : so Verg. Aen. iii. 234 : sociis tune arma capessant edico et dira bellum cum gente gerendum. 1 Ames/ in the lines of Horace, first takes an Accus. Object triumphos, and then a Prolative Infin. did, with its comple- ments. The example belongs to that kind of construction which grammarians have called Zeugma. See 61. Our last Relation, the Annexive (VIII.), is in kind dif- ferent from the other seven. It is really no more than a com- pendious method, by which a word B is noted as assignable to the same Relation with a preceding word A. It is a con- venient substitute for those cumbersome and yet incomplete rules which in the old School Grammars were meant to account for the cases, moods, &c. of words linked to others by various conjunctions. See Supplementary Note II. p. 579. 15. There are two great facts in Grammar which the student of language should always bear in mind : (1) Few Definitions are free from examples which occa- sionally stray beyond the precincts there laid down, to enter those of another Definition. For instance : a Substantive may sometimes become an Adjective (rex, regina, raptor, victor, victrix, &c.) : an Adjective or Participle often becomes a Substantive (sapiens, utile, utilia, adulescens, sponsus, dictum, &c.) : a Verb contains a Noun among its forms : a Noun sometimes takes the functions of a Verb : an Adverb becomes a Preposition, a Preposition an Adverb : Declensions encroach upon one another ; and so on. (2) A Norm or Rule may be liable to numerous exceptions: Preface. xvii and yet, even if the excepted instances could be shewn to equal or even exceed in number the instances which obey the rule, the Norm ought to remain paramount, and not to be extended in order to recognise such instances as normal. See 101. Thus, referring to (i), all Annexed Words belong to some one or more of the other Relations also. Every Complement, belonging, as such, to I. will fall under some other Relation also. Of those which occur in the examples, p. 354, the first six fall under II., the seventh and eighth under VI., the tenth under IV., the ninth and eleventh under V. Most examples of Relation VI. and some of IV. V. are akin to II., being attributive in sense, but excluded from II. because they appear as caseforms, and not in attributive concord. 1 6. The foregoing observations shew that, in the mode of treating these Relations, there is no spurious intrusion of Logic into Grammar. The Dative is not merged in the category of Circumstance, nor the Genitive in that of Attri- bution (Qualitative). Each case has its own sphere : the Nomi- native (as Subject-case) and the First Concord are in I., the Accusative as Case of nearer Object is in III., the Dative as remoter Object-case in IV., the Ablative (with the Accusative depending on Prepositions) in V., the Genitive in VI. The Concords 2, 3, 4, come under II.; the peculiar use of the Infinitive under VII., the linking by Conjunctions under VIII. Afterwards, the Vocative and all Interjectional usages lying out of the Sentence are separately treated, and then the theory of the Relative. Grammar is followed, Grammar kept in view, throughout. Experience proves that such a synopsis of the Simple Sentence does materially help many students to read with more profitable appreciation the rules that follow, and, reviewed again at the close, will map the subject in their minds more lucidly and more enduringly. IV. Ellipse of the Finite Forms of 'Sum.' 17. This topic is considered in the note on p. 428 : see also 99, Munro on Lucr. ii. i, with the authorities there cited. The ellipse occasionally creates misinterpretation, participles finitely used being sometimes mistaken for mere participles (Hor. C. i. 37. 25; ii. 9. 15), and again mere participles having been regarded as finite : thus in Verg. B. ii. 40 : xviii Preface. praeterea duo nee tuta mihi valle reperti capreoli, sparsis etiam nunc pellibus albo, bina die siccant ovis ubera; quos tibi servo. Wagner and Ribbeck have a semicolon after ' albo/ thus apparently making 'reperti' finite: but the tenour of the passage indicates that ' capreoli siccant 7 is the principal predi- cation, and ' reperti ' a mere participle. The ellipse of ' esse ' in oblique construction, when the par- ticiples perfect, future, or gerundive occur as accusatives in dependence, is familiar to every reader of Latin authors in prose and poetry. But the Prolative construction, by which the Nominatives of these Participles are used as Infinitives without ' esse/ is not by any means so generally and so well understood by young scholars. They are therefore advised to study with care the note on 180 in this Grammar, and to collect other examples of this construction (the Participles in the Nominative as Infinitives without ' esse '), which are not duly recognised in Madvig's Grammar. It may perhaps be more clearly exhibited by setting side by side the Accusative (Oblique) and the Nominative (Prolative) constructions in a few examples. a. T. Manlium locutum ferunt, T. Manlius locutus fertur, Liv. b. Ferunt Promethea coactum . . . Fertur Prometheus coactus . . . Hor. c. Delectum habendum putant, Delectus habendus putatur. d. Omnes secuturos verisimile est, Omnes secuturi videntur. e. Graeciam collisam narrant, Graecia collisa narratur, Hor. f. Memorant quendam solitum . . . Memoratur quidam solitus, . . . Hor. g. Credimus Athon velificatum, Creditur Athos velificatus, luv. h. Ferunt genetricem adfatam lovem, Fertur genetrix adfata lovem, Verg. ix. 82. In every one of these examples ' esse ' is to be mentally supplied its construction being Oblique ( 194) in each former Prolative ( 180) in each latter line. Preface. xix V. 1 8. Some nice points of Syntax have been either over- looked or inadequately treated. Such are the Substantival constructions with ut and quod, in place of an Infinitive Clause. See 195-6. Still more unfortunate has been the treatment of constructions ranked in this Grammar under the title Petitio Obliqua, 197. A disposition is shewn by some writers to make these mere varieties of the Adverbial (Final) Clause with ut, ne, although their prominence and importance in Narratio Obliqua ( 230) prove their just rank as one of the three varieties of dependent Substantival Clauses, which con- stitute Oratio Obliqua. The Statement (Accusative and In- finitive) and the Question assert themselves, as it were, and cannot be ignored : but the Dependent Petition has to wage a sort of rivalry with other constructions of ut, ne, in order to obtain its just place in Grammar, as representing an Oblique 1 permission, command, or request. 7 The examples which Madvig cites in 403-4, shewing the juxtaposition in Narratio Obliqua of indirect statements, commands, and questions, might have shewn him the true order in which the three ought to be treated. ' Si pacem populus Romanus cum Helvetiis faceret, in earn part em ituros atque Vsifuturos Helvetia s, ubi eos Caesar con- stituisset atque esse voluisset : sin bello persequi perseveraret, reminisceretur et veteris incommodi populi Romani et .pristinae virtutis Helvetiorum . . . quare ne committeret ut is locus, ubi constitissent, ex calamitate populi Romani . . . nomen caperet. ; Caes. B. G. i. 13. * Cum vellet, congrederetur ; intellecturum quid invicti Germani .... virtute possent.' Caes. B. G. i. 38. ' Duces pronuntiare iusserunt : " ne quis ab loco discederet ; illorum esse praedam atque illis reservari quaecumque Romani reliquissent : proinde omnia in victoria posita existimarent? ' Caes. B. G. v. 34. 6 Cicero respondit : " non esse consuetudinem populi Romani accipere ab hoste armato condicionem : si ab armis discedere velint, se adiutore utantur legatosque ad Caesarem mittant ; sperare, pro eius iustitia quae petierint impetraturos." ' Caes. B. G. v. 42. ' Nuntia Romanis : " caelestes ita velle ut mea Roma caput orbis terrarum sit : proinde rem militarem colant; sciantque a 2 xx Preface. et ita posteris tradant, nullas opes humanas armis Romanis resistere posse."' Liv. i. 16. 'Exprobrant multitudini : " saginare plebem populares suos, ut iugulentur. hoccine patiendum fuisse, si ad nutum dictatoris non respondent vir consularis ? fingerent mentitum ante, atque ideo non habuisse quod turn responderet : cui servo umquam mendacii poenam vincula fuisse ? " ' Liv. vi. 1 7. ' Blaesus multa dicendi arte, " non per seditionem et turbas desideria militum ad Caesarem/mw/tf," ait ; " neque veteres ab imperatoribus priscis neque ipsos ab divo Augusto tarn nova petivisse\ et pariim in tempore incipientes principis curas onerari : si tamen tenderent in pace temptare quae ne civilium quidem bellorum victores expostulaverint, cur contra morem obsequii, contra fas disciplinae vim meditenturl decemerent legates seque coram mandata darent" ' Tac. Ann. i. 19. ' Eo in metu arguere Germanicum omnes, quod non ad supe- riorem exercitum fcrgeret, ubi obsequia et contra rebellis auxi- lium: "Satis superque missione et pecunia et mollibus consultis pcccatum ; vel si vilis ipsi salus, cur filium parvulum, cur gravi- dam coniugem inter furentes et omnis human! iuris violatores haberett illos saltern avo et reipublicae redder et."' Tac. Ann. i. 40. See do. do. ii. 15. ' post paulo scribit sibi milia quinque esse domi chlamydum ; partem vel tolleret omnes. 7 Hor. Epist. i. 6. 43. Compare Verg. Aen. iv. 683 : date volnera lymphis Abluam, where ' suboblique ' should be 'virtually suboblique ; ; also the examples in the ' Public School Latin Primer/ p. 168. The construction of Subjunctives in dependence on formal Oratio Obliqua and on other Subjunctives is not controverted, .and need not therefore be here specially exemplified. It appears indeed in almost every page of great Latin prose writers, and is noted by italics in the examples of Compound Construction ( 194, &c.) in this Grammar. XV. 28. Madvig, whose great merit is the nice observation of particular idioms, notices ( 370), that the Second Person of the Conjunctive is used (like 'man 7 in German, 'on' in French) to express an undefined subject (some one, any one). Thus often in principal construction : Quern neque gloria nee pericula excitant, nequiquam hortere, Sail. Cat. 58. Canes venaticos diceres, Cic. Verr. iv. 13. It appears also in Clauses dependent on some general statement, which we call Gnomic. Cum animum ab istis imaginibus ad veritatem traduxeris, nihil relinquitur, Cic. T. D. v. 5. Bonus segnior fit, ubineglegas, Sail. lug. 31. Cum aetas extrema advenit, turn illud quod praeteriit effluxit ; tantum remanet, quod virtute et recte factis consecutus sis, Cic. d. Or. iii. 52. Mens, quoque et animus, nisi tamquam lumini oleum instilles, extinguuntur senectute, Cic. C. M. ii. Virtu tern necessario gloria, etiamsi tu id non agas, consequitur, Cic. T. D. i. 38. Gerundive and other Imper- sonal Verbs have a gnomic character, and are sometimes used with Subjunctive clauses dependent on them. Suae cuique utilitati, quod sine alterius iniuria fiat, serviendum est. Cic. Tibi ipsi dicendumerit aliquid quod non sentias aut fa c i- e n d u m quod non probes, Cic. Fam. iv. 9. Est enim s a p i e n- tis, quidquid homini accidere possit, id praemeditari ferendum modice esse, si evenerit. Maioris omnino est consilii pro- videre, nequid tale accidat ; animi non minoris fortiter ferre, si evenerit, Cic. Phil. xi. 3. Dicere fortasse quae sentias, non licet ; tacere plane licet, Cic. Fam. iv. 9. xxxviii Preface. XVI. 29. In quitting the topic of Virtual Oratio Obliqua, on which I have dwelt longer than I expected, I have to say that this is one of the few terms for which I am responsible. I should have been equally content to call it ' contained ' or ' implied,' or ' informal' Oratio Obliqua : all which mean one and the same thing. The point at issue is this : Are they right, who like Madvig ( 357, 368-9, 404) put forward first the usage (a) Principal Sentence (Indie.) -f Clause (Subjunct.) and follow this up with (ft) Princ. Sent. (Indie.) + O. Obliqua + Clause (Subjunct) thus making (ft) a corollary or special case of (a) ? Or are they right, who give the converse order, and make (a) a corollary or special case of (/3) ? Having had this question in view for half a century or more, I have never for a moment doubted that the just gram- matical order is that which appears in this book ( 190-191), from (ft) to (a), not from (a) to (/3) ; that this is the order in which teachers and students ought to pursue the doctrine of Oblique Construction in Latin ; taking the Infinitive Clause (Accus. and Infin.) as its first most representative mbst nor- mal form ( 100, 190, 194). XVII. 30. Yet, although Madvig has failed to treat the doctrine in this order, I shall now cite incidental passages from his book, which indicate an inadequately developed conscious- ness of that order being the true one. (1) When treating of the Accusative ( 322) Madvig says : 'In the indefinite infinitive expression, when the connexion between the subject and predicate is not of itself asserted, the subject and the predicative noun stand in the accusative, e.g. hominem currere, that a man runs ; esse dominum, to be lord' This just view, properly followed up, ought to have led him to place the Accus. and Infin. in the front of Compound Construc- tion. But he lost sight of its true importance in his Second Part. (2) In his Chapter on the Conjunctive, where most of his paragraphs are useful, as isolated remarks, but uninstructive, in so far as they are out of place and unsystematic he says (348, Obs. 3): 'The same holds' to our mind the connexion Preface. xxxix he suggests has no real existence 'of other conditional propositions, which do not contain a condition applying to the leading proposition, but complete an idea contained in it, which has the force of an infinitive or otherwise dependent pro- position, so that the conditional clause belongs to the " oratio obliqua" e.g. Metellus Centuripinis, nisi statuas Veneris restituis- sent, graviter minatur (Cic. Verr. ii. 67 minatur se iis malum daturum nisi Minatur is stated absolutely without any condi- tion), lugurtha iram senatus timebat, ni paruisset legatis (Sail. fug. 25 ne senatus irasceretur). Nulla maior occurrebat res quam si optimarum artium vias traderem meis civibus (Cic. de Div. ii. i, e.g. Nullam rem putabam maiorem esse.)' Need I say that in this passage occurring before he has introduced those rules and examples on the Subjunctive clause before referred to Madvig does, in point of fact, though but partially, teach the very doctrine which is drawn out in this Grammar, and which in this part of the Preface I have been maintaining and exemplifying, the doctrine of Virtual Oratio Obliqua, exhibited in his three cited examples ? He has, un- happily, failed to recognise its wide scope and great im- portance, and so to give it due prominence afterwards. The late Professor Key, a learned and ingenious scholar, in his Latin Grammar (1201-1204) states first the doctrine of Oratio Obliqua (too narrowly, because he has not based it on the triple form of simple sentences and dependent Substantival clauses) and then adds (1205): * Without a formal use of the " Oratio Obliqua," a verb in a dependent clause may be in the Subjunctive Mood, when it expresses the thoughts or words or alleged reasons of another/ He then cites the example, Cic. T. D. v. 36 (given by us, p. 459) Aristides, &c. and the two following : Fabio dicta dies est, quod legatus in Gallos fugnasset, Liv. vi. i. Aedem lovi vovit, si eo die hostes/z^/m^/, Liv. xxxi. 21 : (in which obviously : Fabio dicta dies ts\.=Fabius accusatus est, and vovit contains se dedicaturum). Thus, by saying ' without a formal use of the Obliqua Oratio/ Key recognises an informal (or virtual) use of it, as I do ; and postpones this rightly to the formal use. I could cite German grammarians, were it worth while, whose treat- ment implies the same principles : for instance, Middendorf and Griiter, Frei, Billroth, Ellendt, &c. But the term (Virtual O. O.) was, I repeat, introduced by me thirty-six years ago. x 1 Preface. It rests upon its own fitness : I can but deprecate, if it exist anywhere, the spirit complained of by Horace, when he says : Indignor quicquam reprehendi, non quia crasse Compositum illepideve putetur, sed quia nuper. Ep. ii. i, 76. XVIII. 31. The question, whether the (independent) Thought-mood should be called Subjunctive or Conjunctive, stands as follows: The Greek grammarians of Alexandria used the term lyK\iaiq vTToroKTiKri, modus subjunctivus. Why? Because in Greek there are two forms of the Thought-mood, one of which they called EVKTLK^ Optative, the other {/Trorcu-rt^, Subjunctive. Neither of these terms corresponds exactly to the uses of the respective forms. The term Optative expresses only one use of the first: that of praying or wishing, e'Xflot, may it come: but it has also a dependent use, on t\6oi, that it was come, and by the convenient accession of the modal particle ai> it gains an in- dependent or enuntiative power e\6oi av, like the Latin ' veni- ret,' // would come. The second form I \9y was called (/Trora/c- TWYI because it never did acquire enuntiative power; the modal av was not extended to it, but only the conjunction av, if, the conjunctional relative OQ av &c., whosoever, &c., in dependent construction. It has, however, an independent power as suc- cursal to the imperative, in hortative sense ist pers. plur., eXdwpev, let us come ; and as interrogative, in dubitative sense, T'I 0o>, what can I say? In spite of these two exceptional uses, it is manifest that the term i/Trora/v-rt/o/, subjunctive, is, for the Greek mood, fully defensible, because its principal and (so to say) normal use is dependence. German grammarians, however, call it Conjunctive ; wisely we think, for the maintenance of analogy But for calling the Latin Thought-mood, generally, Sub- junctive, there seems to be, from a right point of view, no reason- able defence. Key, indeed, has taken a point of view, which, if it were right, would supply one. His words are (Gr. 427-8): 'The Subjunctive Mood, as its name implies, is used in secondary sentences subjoined to the main verb. In some sentences it is not uncommon to omit the main verb, and then the Subjunctive Mood seems to signify power, permission, duty, Preface. xll wish, purpose, result, allegation, hypothesis ; whereas in fact these notions belong to the verb which is not expressed. Thus the phrase " quid faciam " is translated by what should I do or what am I to do ? but the full phrase is " quid vis faciam ? " what do you wish me to do ? (!) ; This theory Key, perhaps, borrowed from Hermann, who applies it (De emendanda ratione Grammaticae Graecae) to explain the two exceptional uses before noticed of the Greek Subjunctive: supposing tw/ie^ = aye 'Ictfier, and TL (f)w=cri]fj.r]ror or OVK olc)a TL (j)ti. This farfetched caprice of an ellipsis is bad enough as used by Hermann: but when applied to all the independent usages of the Latin Thought-mood it has not, I think, been accepted by any grammarian but Key himself. I therefore consider the adoption of the term Subjunctive, as a name for that mood generally, to be an unwise and unjustifiable violation of propriety in the choice of terms. Such no doubt is the opinion of that multitude of grammatical writers who take the term Conjunctive in its stead, though, unhappily, they neglect to assign a distinct name to that dependent use, which is really Subjunctive. To this neglect is due, in great measure, their vague and unsatisfactory method of treating Compound Construction in Latin; a method pro- pagated, through Madvig, to some English scholars. See Uses of the Verb, 90-99 of this Grammar, Ap- pendix ii. to the ' Public School Latin Primer/ and the Preface to my Second Edition of Virgil. XIX. 32. The small number of terms for which this Grammar is specially responsible will be seen in its Index. Care has been taken to make them etymologically appropriate, and useful for their several purposes. On such points I have always invited expression of opinion by correspondence. It has been justly urged, that the term Factitive (adopted from German writers for that class of verbs which join a complement to their object, 106, 131) is bad in etymology. I have there- fore now written Factive : but I feel inclined to prefer the term * Appositive Verbs': i.e. such as append to their object a complement resembling an apposition: populus Numam regem creavit : puto tefelicem (philosophum). The point merits further consideration. xlii Preface. XX. 33. Among the numerous books which in the course of my grammatical labours have been consulted with profit, I desire specially to mention the various writings of Mr. Thring, of Uppingham. His ' Elements of Grammar taught in English ' is an admirable companion book to the 'Public School Primer ' for early instruction in Latin. 1 B. H. KENNEDY. CAMBRIDGE : Oct. 5, 1879. CONTENTS. [Numerals following represent the marginal numeration. Numerals without represent the pages. The matter printed in Italics belongs to the Footnotes.] 1-5, p. I INTRODUCTION. i. Divisions of Grammar ; the Latin Language ; Families of Language ; the Semitic Family ; the Aryan Family and its branches. 2. The Italic Branch ; its Dialects ; Latin ; Languages derived from Latin ; English ; its formation ; Influence of Greek on Latin. 3. Sketch of Latin Literature ; Table of Classical Authors. 4. Abbre- viations in this Grammar. 6-99, P- S- ... PART I. ETYMOLOGY. 6, p. 5. Divisions of Etymology ; Primitive Sounds and Roots. 7-12, p. 5. . DIVISION i. PHONOLOGY OR SOUNDLORE. 5. i. Alphabet ; Capital and Small Letters ; Vowels ; Consonants. 6. Divisions of the Consonants ; ii. Quantity, short, long, doubtful ; iii. Syllabation. 7. iv. Accentuation ; Middle Tone. 8. v. Punctua- tion ; vi. Relations of the Letters ; Scheme of Vowels ; Scheme of Consonants. 9. vii. Memoranda from the History of the Alphabet ; the Letters c, g, k, q, h, f, v, z, y, x ; the Aspirate sounds ch, th, ph, rh ; the three Letters of the Emperor Claudius, viii. the Semiconso- nants i-j and v-u. 10. i-consonans and i-vocalis ; v-consonans and v-vocalis. ix. Sound and quality of the Vowels ; three primitive Vowels a, i, u. ii. a the standard Vowel ; introduction of e, o ; compara- tive strength of Vowels ; lengthening of Vowels ; Final short and long Vowels, x. phonetic Decay in old Italian Language ; Classical Latin -a reaction. 12. xi. Vowel-change ; strengthening or weaken- ing, xii. Formation and Decay of Diphthongs; Guna and Vridclhi ; full list of Diphthongs ; ui, yi. Ai (ae) and its changes. 13. Oi (oe) and its changes ; ei and its changes ; au, eu, ou. 14-17. xiii. Vowel- strengthening in Root-syllables, Suffixes and Endings. 18. xiv. Vowel-strengthening in Disyllabic Perfects ; xv. Compensation. 19. xvi. Nasalization ; xvii. Vowel-weakening ; Euphony ; Selection ; e as final. 20. xviii. The Vowel a and its weakenings, A) in Root- and Stem-syllables ; B) in Suffixes ; C) in Cases 'and Personal End- ings. 21. xix. Weakening into o as influenced by Selection. 21-24. xliv Contents. xx. Weakening into u as influenced by Selection. 22. Dialectic use of o and u in final syllables. Formidulosus, &c. 23. Gerundive forms oirdus, &c. 24-28. xxi. Change into e as influenced by Selection. 29-31. xxii. Selection of I. 30. Vincular \. Note. 32. Recapitulation. 32-35. xxiii. Vowel-change by Assimilation and Dissimilation of Vowels to each other. 35-39. xxiv. Vowel-weakening in the second Member of Compounds ; 35. Loose and Fast Compounds ; Some Com- pounds unweakened. 36. In others, a weakened into u ; a into e ; 37. a into i ; 38. e into i ; 39. e into u ; a e into I ; o e into \ ; o e into u ; a u into o ; a u into u ; a u into o e. 40. xxv. Reduplication. 41-44. xxvi. Changes of concurrent Consonants. 41. Complete Assimilation of Consonants ; Regressive. 42. Progressive. Partial Assimilation of Consonants. Formation of Comparatives and Superlatives. 43. Dis- similation of Consonants. 44. xxvii. Loss of Initial letters. 45. xxviii. Loss of Final Letters. 47-50. xxix. Loss of Inner Consonants by Concurrence with other Consonants. 50-52. xxx. Loss of Inner Vowels before Consonants. 52-55. xxxi. Hiatus, Elision, Contraction and Coalition of Vowels. 54. xxxii. Loss of Inner Vowels with Consonants. 55-56. xxxiii. The Shortening of Vowels in Latin. 56-58. xxxiv. Ex- clusion of Consonants followed by Contraction of Vowels. Peculiar Contractions in Verbs. 59-68. xxxv. Relations of the Consonants in Latin and kindred Languages. 58-60. The Guttural Surds c (k) q. 59. Labialism and Dentalism. 60. Sound of 'ce, ci. 61. The Guttural Sonant g. 61-62. The Aspirates h, f. 63. The Labial Mutes p, b ; the Dentals t, d. 64-66. The Nasals n, m ; the Liquids 1, r, and the Sibilant s. 66. The Soft Labial Spirant v. 67. Sound of V-consonans ; I-consonans. 68. The Double Consonant x. ^Words which have lost an initial letter. I 3~99 P' 69. . DIVISION ii. MORPHOLOGY or WORDLORE. 13, p. 69 SUBDIVISIONS. 14-16, p. 69. CHAPTER I. WORDS AND THEIR FLEXION. 69. i. Stem-flexion : Word ; Stem ; Root ; Suffix. 70. Prefix ; Character ; Flexion ; Definition of Stem ; of Root. 70-73. ii. Classi- fication of Words. 70. I. Nouns ; Noun Substantive. 71. Noun Adjective ; Attribution ; Pronoun ; Apposition ; Names, Abstract and Concrete. Common Names. Collective Nouns. Adjectives for Sub- stantives. Numerals. 72. Declension ; Accidents of Nouns ; II. Verb Finite and Infinite; Conjugation, Accidents of Verb ; III. Particles; Adverb ; Preposition. 73. Conjunction ; Interjection ; Parts of Speech ; Absence of Articles. 17-34, p. 73- ... CHAPTER //.NOUNS. 17-21, p. 73 SECTION i. 73. i. Number in Nouns. 73-79. ii. Gender of Nouns. 74. Distinct Generic Names ; Mobilia. 75. Verbals of double Gender ; Patrony- mics. 75-77. Words Common of two Genders. 75. Appellatives. 76. Names of Animals. 77. Epicoena. 77-79. Gender shown by meaning. 80. iii. The Cases ; Declension ; Case in ancient and modern lan- guage. Order of the Cases. 81. iv. The Five Declensions. 82-84. v - Formation of the Cases. 85. vi. Endings of the Five Declensions. Contents. xlv 22, p. 86. . SECTION ii. i. FIRST DECLENSION ; A-NOUNS. 86. Nouns contained in First Decl. ii. Table, iii. Cases in First Decl. 87-89. iv. Greek Nouns in First Decl. 23, p. 89. SECTION in. i. SECOND DECLENSION ; O-NOUNS. 89. Nouns contained in Second Decl. ii. Table. 90. iii. Cases, 91. iv. Clipt Nouns in er. 92. v. Greek Nouns in Second Decl. vi. Gender. 93. vii. Table of Adjectives in Decl. II. and I. 24, p. 94. . SECTION iv. i. THIRD DECLENSION, CONSONANT AND I-NOUNS. 94. The two Divisions ; their occasional confusion ; its cause ; ii. Nominative Endings in the Consonant Declension. 95. Vowel of True Stem. 95-103. iii. Syllabus of Cons. Stems, with Genders, 95-96. A. Mute Guttural Stems. 96-99. B. Mute Dental Stems. 99. C. Mute Labial Stems. 99-101. D. Nasal Stems. 101-103. E. Liquid and Sibilant Stems. 103. F. u- and v-stems. G. Greek e- o- and y-stems. 104. iv. I-stems: Imparisyllaba and Parisyllaba. v. Grouping of I-nouns with Gender. 104-106. A] Parisyllable I-nouns in Xs (er). 104-106. Nature of i. B} Parisyllable I-nouns Fern, in es (is). 106-107. C) Neuter I-nouns in 8, al, ar. 107-108. D] Clipt I-nouns Imparisyllable. 108-109. vi. Notes on the Cases. 109. Gen. PI. varying with form of Noun. Summary of Gender in Third Decl. 110-112. vii. Table of Third Decl. 112-115. vn i- Greek Nouns in Third Decl. 114-115. Greek Table. 115-119. ix. Adjectives in Third Decl. 115. Con- sonant Adjectives; Table. 116-119. Adjectives not purely Consonantal. Four Groups. 118-119. Table of these Adjectives. 25, p. 119. . SECTION v. i. FOURTH DECLENSION ; U-NOUNS. 119. ii. Table. 120. iii. Confusion of U- and O-nouns. 121. iii. Cases in Fourth Decl. 121. iv. Gender in Fourth Decl. 26, p. 121. SECTION vi. i. FIFTH DECLENSION. E-NOUNS, FEM. ii. Table. 122. iii. Cases in Fifth Decl. iv. Gender of dies. 27-28, p. 123. . . SECTION vn. IRREGULAR NOUNS. 123. i. Irregularity ; Abundance ; Defect. 123-125. ii. Abundance in Substantives; of Declension ; of Case-forms. 125-130. iii. Defect in Substantives. 125. A. Defect of Number. I) Substantives Singular only. 126-128. II) Plural only. 128-129. Ill) Substantives which change their meaning in Plural. 129-130. B. Defect of Case. Substantives Defective in Case. 131. iv. Irregularity in Adjectives ; Abundance ; Defect. 29-30, p. 131. . . SECTION vni. COMPARISON. 131-132. i. Comparison of Adjectives; 132. Degrees of Comparison ; ii. Examples ; iii. Notes on Comparison. 133. iv. Irregular Compa- rison. 133-135. v. Defective Comparison. 135. vi. Comparison of Adverbs. 136. vii. Irregular Comparison in Adverbs. xlvi Contents. 31, p. 136. .... SECTION ix. PRONOUNS. 136. i. Pronouns Substantive or Adjective ; their Persons. 136- 137. ii. Classification of Pronouns : A. Substantival : i. Personal ; 2. Reflexive ; B. 3. Possessive ; C. 4. Demonstrative ; 5. Definitive ; 6. Relative ; a. Interrogative ; b. Indefinite ; c. Compound Pro- nouns ; 7. Pronominalia ; 138-142. iii. Tables of Declension. 142- 143. Observations on certain Pronouns. 143-145. Ancient Case forms of Pronouns. 144-146. iv. Correlation of Pronouns. 32-34, p. 147. . . . SECTION x. NUMERALS. 147. i. Numeralia ; ii. Symbols of Number : Note on these ; iii. The Four Chief Numeral Series Cardinal, Ordinal, Distributive Numerals, Quotientive Adverbs. 148-149. iv. Minor Numeral Series. 150-151. v. Declension of Numerals. 150-153. Numeral Table ; Numeral Roots. 153-155. vi. Use of the Numerals. 156-157. Compound Numeration. I 57~ I 5 8 - viii. Expression of Fractions ; the As and its parts ; Calcu- lation of Inheritance. 35-53. P- i5- - ' - CHAPTER ///.THE VERB. 35-4 ' P- X 5 8 - SECTION i. i. THE VERB FINITE AND INFINITE. ii. The Voices. 159. iii. Deponent Verbs, iv. Verbs Transitive and Intransitive ; Impersonal and Reflexive uses of the Verb. 160. v. Verbs Quasi-Passive and Semi-Deponent ; Passive Participles from Active Verbs. 160-161. The Moods Indicative, Conjunctive, Im- perative. 161-164. vii- The Tenses. 161-163. Tense-forms Inflected or Combinate. 163. Table of Tense-forms. Conjunctive Tenses. 164. Combinate or Periphrastic Forms ; Tenses Primary and Historic, viii. Number and Person. 164-166. ix. The Verb Infinite ; Infinitive ; Gerunds ; Gerundive ; Supines ; Participles. 41-50, p. 166. . . . SECTION ii. THE CONJUGATION OF VERBS. 166. i. The three Stems in Verbs ; Parts derived from them seve- rally. 167. ii. The Verb of Being 'sum' (esse) ; Forms of sum t esse. 160. Its Table. 169-182. iii. The Four Conjugations of Regular Verbs ; Weak and Strong Conjugations ; the Stems in each. 169. Quantity of the Vowel Char acters . 170-171. Mode of Conjugating Verbs Active, Passive, and Deponent. 171. Verbs in io of Conj. 3. 172- 182. Tables of the Four Conjugations Active, Passive, and Depo- nent. 180. Of lo-Verbs in Conj. 3. 180-182. iv. Combinate or Peri- phrastic Conjugation. 181-183. Correspondence of the Latin Verb. 183-189. v. Conjugation of Irregular Verbs. 184. Possum. 184-185. Fero. 186. Fio. 187. Volo, nolo, malo. 188. Eo, queo, nequeo. 189. Edo. 189-191. Conjugation of Defective Verbs. 189. Praeteri- tiva, coepi, odi, memini. Capio, &c. 190. Novi, aio. 191, Inquam, ovare, quaeso. 192-194. Impersonal Verbs. 192. Im- personal Verbs Active. 193. Impersonal Verbs Passive. 194. Imper- sonals Gerundive. Contents. xlvii 5*1 P- X 94- SECTION iv. THE FORMS OF THE THREE STEMS IN VERBS. 194-196. i. The Present Stem and its Affections. 196. Inceptive or Inchoative Verbs in sco. 196-199. ii. The Perfect Stem and its varieties of formation. 199-202. iii. The Supine Stem and its va- rieties of formation. 52, p. 202. . . . SECTION v. COMPOSITION OF VERBS. 202-203. i. Prepositions compounded with Verbs, separable and inseparable ; their Euphonic Mutations ; Examples. 202. Sus, subs. 203. The form obs. 204. Scheme of Vowel-changes in the three Stems of Compound Verbs. 205. ii. Verbs compounded with Ad- verbs ; with Nominal or Verbal Elements. 53, p. 205. SECTION vi. SYLLABUS OF STEM-FORMATION IN VERBS. 205. A] The First Conjugation ; Imitative Verbs ; Frequentative Verbs ; Deminutive Verbs ; B] Second Conjugation ; C) Fourth Con- jugation. 206. Desiderative Verbs ; D) Third Conjugation. 206-208. Stem-table of A- verbs; Compounds ; Deponent A-verbs. 209-214. Stem 1 table of E-verbs, Compounds. 214-216. Stem-table of I-verbs, Com* founds. 216-227. Stem-table of Consonant and U-verbs, Compounds. 216-217. Cons. Verbs with reduplicated Perfect-stem. 217-218. With strengthened Perf. stem. 219-221. With agglutinated Perf. Stem in ui, vi. 221-224. With agglutinated s in Perf. stem. 221-223. Gut- tural Stems. 223. Dental Stems. 224. Labial, Nasal, and Liquid Stems. 224-225. U-verbs. 225-227. Deponent Verbs in Third Con- jugation. 226-227. Inchoative Verbs. 227. Homonymous Verb-forms. 54-58, p. 228. . CHAPTER IV. PARTICLES. 228. Four Classes of Particles; their intimate connexion. 55, p. 228 SECTION i. ADVERBS. 228-232. Interrogative Adverbs referring to Place, Time, Number, Manner, Degree, Cause, Quality, &c. Table of Adverbs corresponding to these severally. 56, p. 232. . . . SECTION ii. PREPOSITIONS. 232. Relations expressed by Prepositions. i) Prepositions which take Accusative Case. 233. 2) Prepositions which take Ablative Case. 3) Prepositions which take either case. 57 P- 2 33- SECTION in. CONJUNCTIONS. 233. Conjunctions, Coordinative or Subordinative ; Conjunctions with both uses. A. List of Coordinative Conjunctions. 234. B. List of Subordinative Conjunctions. 58, p. 234 SECTION iv. INTERJECTIONS. 234. Interjections expressing various Emotions. 235. Interjectional Nouns ; Verbs ; Adverbs ; Phrases. Cases found with Interjections. xlviii Contents. 59. P- 235-253- CHAPTER V. DERIVATION AND COMPOSITION OF WORDS. p. 235 . . . SECTION i. DERIVATION OF NOUNS. 236. i. Staminal Suffix, ii. Root or Rudiment, iii. Suffixes. 237. iv. Rudimental Words. 237-248. v. Syllabus of Suffixes ; Ex- amples. 247. Formation ofDeminutives ; Examples, vi. Patronymics. 249. vii. Names of ^Countries. 249-251. viii. Nominative Endings of derived Words according to their meanings ; Examples. 252. Ad- jectives derived from Particles ; Examples. 252-253. Adjectives derived from Proper Names : Personal ; Gentile ; Roman Names. p. 254. . SECTION ii. DERIVATION OF VERBS. 254. Verbs derived from Verbs ; Verbs derived from Nouns. p. 255-259. SECTION in. DERIVATION OF PARTICLES. 255. i. Primitive Particles, ii. Particles derived from Nouns ; from Pronouns ; from other Particles. Particles compounded with other Particles. 256-257. iii. Denominative Adverbs in the form of Cases. 257-258. Denominative Adverbs with Adverbial Endings. 258. v. Derivation of Pronominal Particles. 259. vi. Other Particles. Note on some of them. 60, p. 259-266. SECTION iv. COMPOSITION OF WORDS. 260. i. Parts of a Compound, Fundamental and Determinative ; Parathetic and Synthetic Composition, ii. Varieties of Composition, Constructive, Attributive, Adverbial, and Possessive. 260-263. Syn- thetically compounded Substantives, Adjectives and Verbs. 263. De- composita. 263-266. Verbs compounded with Prepositions ; their various senses, &c. 61-99, p. 267. . CHAPTER VI. USES OF WORDS. 6l, p. 267. SECTION I. i. FlGURATE CONSTRUCTION. 267-269. ii. Ellipsis ; Zeugma ; Pleonasm ; Examples ; Attraction ; Synesis. 269-270. iii. Other Variations. 270. iv. Metaphor; Metonymy. 62, p. 270. . SECTION II. USES OF THE SUBSTANTIVE. 270. i. Singular Appellatives used collectively for Plurals. 271. ii. Plural words used with Singular collective sense in prose and poetry, iii. ^ Plural used to express a 'genus,' when individuals are implied, iv. "Plural of Proper Names expressing typical characters, v. Ab- stract Substantives used in Plural. 272. vi. Abstract Substantives for Concrete. 272-273. vii. Idioms of Substantives. 274-275. viii. El- lipse of Substantives. 6 3 P- 2 75- SECTION III. USES OF THE ADJECTIVE. 275-278. i. Adjectives used as Substantives. 278. ii. Adjectives used adverbially in Predicative Construction, iii. Partitive Attributes. Contents. xlix iv. Multiplication of Attributes. 279. v. Possessive Attributes, vi. Idioms of the Superlative. 280. vii. Intensive Phrases. 281. viii. Adjectives used in Passive and Active Sense. 64-69, p. 28l. . SECTION IV. USES OF PRONOUNS. 281. i. Personal and Possessive Pronouns. 282-285. ii. Demonstra- tive Pronouns h i c, i 1 1 e, i s t e, is, idem. 285-287. iii. The Reflexive Pronouns se, suus. 287-289. iv. The Definitive Pronoun ipse. 289-291. v. The Indefinite Pronouns quis, qui, aliquis,.aliqui, quispiam, quisquam, quidam, quivis; the Pronoun quisque. 291. vi. The Universal Relatives quisquis, quicum- que, &c. 292. vii. Pronominalia ; alter, uter, &c. ; alius, &c. 70-72, p. 293. . SECTION V. USES OF PREPOSITIONS. 293-299. Examples of Prepositions taking an Accusative Case. 299-304. Examples of Prepositions taking an Ablative Case. 304- 306. Examples of Prepositions taking Accusative and Ablative. 306. Prepositions used as Adverbs. 307. Notes on Prepositions. 73-7 6 ' P- 307- SECTION vi. CORRELATIVE CONSTRUCTION. 307-310. i. Pronominal Correlation, ii. 310-312. Correlations of Manner with ut, &c. 312-313. iii. Correlations of Likeness and Un- likeness with atque, ac., &c. 314-315. iv. Correlations of Degree with quam. 314. Quam with Positive and Superlative Adjectives, &c. Quam after Adverbs. 315. Idioms of Comparative. 77-82, p. 316. . . SECTION vii. COORDINATION. 316-320. i. Coordination by Conjunctions. 316. Annexive Conjunc- tions. 317. Distributive Association ; Ordinative Particles. 318. Disjunctive Particles ; Adversative. 320. Causal ; Illative. 320-322. ii. Coordination by the Relative and its Particles. 321-322. Idioms of quod. 83-85, p. 323. . SECTION viii. NEGATIVE WORDS. 323-324. i. Ne and its Compounds. 324. ii. Doubled Negatives. 325-326. iii. Ne . . . quidem, nedum, nonmodo, &c. 86-89, p. 326. . SECTION ix. QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS. I. Questions Single or Disjunctive. 326-327. i. Single Interrogation without Particle ; ii. with,; Particle ; uses of an, nescio an, &c. 328- 329. iii. Disjunctive Interrogation with utrum, &c. 329. II. An- swers, i. Affirmative Answers. 330. ii. Negative Answers. 9-99 P 330- SECTION x. USES OF THE VERB. 331. i. The Indicative Mood and its Tenses ; Use of Mood ; Rela- tions of Tenses. 332-333. Uses of the Present. 333. Uses of the Perfect. 334. Uses of the Imperfect and Pluperfect. Tenses in Roman Letter-writing. 335. Uses of the Simple Future and Future Perfect ; of the Future Periphrastic Conjugation. 336. Idioms of the Contents. Indicative Past Tenses in Predications of duty, necessity, &c. 337. ii. The Imperative Mood and its Tenses. 338. iii. The Conjunctive Mood and its Tenses. 338-341. iv. Uses of the Pure Conjunctive ; Potential. 339. Dubitative, Concessive, Optative, Hortative uses. 340. Permissive and exhorting use of 2nd Pers. Conjunctive ; Prohibitive use. 341. v. Examples of Pure Conjunctive. 342-343. vi. The Sub- junctive ; Subordinate Subjunctive Clauses. 343-344. vii. Particles and Pronouns which introduce Clauses. 344-346. viii. Consecution of Tenses with Examples. 346-347. ix. Ellipses of the Verb. 100-250, p. 348. . . PART II. SYNTAX. 100, p. 348. CHAPTER /. THE DOCTRINE OF SENTENCES. 348. Sentences Affirmative or Negative ; Simple or Compound. In a Compound Sentence, Principal Sentence and Clauses ; Coordinate and Subordinate Clauses. Three Forms of a Simple Sentence Enuntiation, Petition, Interrogation. 349. Oratio Recta and Obliqua. Substantival Clauses ; their Three Kinds Enuntiatio Obliqua, Pe- titio Obliqua, Interrogatio Obliqua. 101-106, p. 349. CHAPTER II. THE SIMPLE SENTENCE. 349. i. Members of a Simple Sentence, Grammatical Subject and Grammatical Predicate. 350. What the Subject may be. What the Predicate. Examples of Predication with Subject and Verb. Omis- sion of Pronoun Subject, ii. Incomplete Predication ; Verbs which do not predicate completely. Sum, esse (complete only when implying absolute existence), usually requires a Complement, 351. Examples. Incomplete Verbs called Copulative. List of Copulative and Factive Verbs. 350-351. Incomplete Predication and its Terms. 352. What the Complement may be. Examples of Copulative Predica- tion. Phrase, Enthesis, Clause. 353. iii. Relations in the Simple Sentence. Note on these. I. Predicative Relation ; Subject and Pre- dicate. II. Qualitative Relation Attribute, Apposite. Adjuncts of Substantives. 354. Four Varieties of Qualitative Relation Epithetic, Enthetic, Adverbial, Complemental. III. Objective Relation ; Ob- ject, Accusative governed by Transitive Verbs ; Verbs with two Objects, Person and Thing; Verbs with two Accusatives, one Oblique Complement of the other. IV. Receptive Relation ; Dative of Recipient. 355. Predicative Dative or Dative of Purpose. Tra- jective Words. V. Circumstantive Relation ; Adverbs ; Ablative Case, &c. 356. VI. Proprietive Relation ; Genitive Case. VII. Pro- lative Relation ; Predication extended by Infinitive. VIII. Annexive Relation ; Conjunctions. 357. iv. Ecthesisby Interjections and Vocative Case. v. Notice of the Relative Pronoun. 358. vi. Conversion of Active Sentences into Passive form. 107-188, p. 359. CHAPTER ///.CONSTRUCTIONS OF THE SIMPLE SENTENCE. 107. I. AGREEMENT. II. CASE-CONSTRUCTION. III. VERB-CONSTRUC- TION. 108-114, p. 359. . . . SECTION i. AGREEMENT. 359. Agreement what. i. The Four Concords : I. Verb with Subject ; Examples. II. Adjective with Substantive; III. Substantive with Contents. H Substantive. 360. Examples of II. III. 361. IV. Relative with Ante- cedent ; Examples, ii. Ellipsis of Subject. 361-362. iii. Attraction of Verb. 362. iv. Synesis in first and second Concords ; of Gender ; of Number; Collective Nouns. 363. v. Composite Subject. 364- 367. vi. Idioms of Attribution and Apposition. 364. Adjective agreeing with Verb-Noun. 365. Adjectival Pronoun substantively used as Subject. Adverbial Attribution and Apposition. Neuter Adjectives Substantival. 366. Number and Gender of Apposites. Peculiar forms of Apposition. 367. Attribute with more than one Noun. Noun with more than one Attribute or Apposite. 367. vii. Synesis and Ellipsis in Relative Construction. 368. Attraction in Relative Construction, viii. Construction of Qualis ; Quantus ; Quot. 369. Abnormal Constructions. 369-370. Examples of the? Rules of Agreement. 115-176, p. 370. . . SECTION ii. CASE-CONSTRUCTION. 115-117, p. 370. . . A. THE NOMINATIVE CASE. 370. i. The Nominative as Subject : ii. As Complement. 371. iii. With Interjections. 118-119, p. 371. . . . B. THE VOCATIVE CASE. 371. i. Vocative without or with Interjection : ii. The Nominative for the Vocative. 120-132, p. 372. . . . C. THE ACCUSATIVE CASE. 372. i. The Accusative the Case of the Contained or Attained Nearer Object : Agent and Object : Obj ective Propositions, ii. Accusative of the Nearer or Attained Object of Transitive Verbs. Examples. 373- 374. iii. Contained Object (Cognate Accusative) : its various instances. 374. Part Affected (Respect), iv. Medial Object in Poetry. 375. v. Accusatives of Time, Space, Measure, vi. Accus. of Place Whither. 376. vii. Transitive Verbs used Intransitively. 376-378. Intransitive Verbs used Transitively. 376. Verbs expressing State. 377. Com- pounds of Intransitive Verbs become Transitive ; Test of Active Trans- itive Verb its power of becoming. Passive, viii. Personal and Im- personal Passives. 378. Preposition of Compound Verb repeated with Accusative. Compounds with two Accusatives. 278. ix. Idio- matic uses. Verbals with Accusative. Unconstructed Accusative. 379. x. Exclamatory Accusative with or without Interjection. 379- 380. xi. Accusatives of two Objects with Verbs of asking, teaching, &c. 380-381. xii. Oblique double Accusative. 381-383. Examples of Accusative. 132-142, p. 382. . . . D. THE DATIVE CASE. 382-383. i. Three chief uses of Dative I. As Remoter Object. II. As Recipient or Acquisitive. III. As expressing Purpose. 384-386. ii. Dative of Remoter Object. Words which govern it. 386-388. Verbs which vary Construction with Meaning. 388-389. Adjectives with Dative Object. 389-390. iii. Recipient or Acquisitive Dative (Corn- modi et Incommodi). 390-391. iv. Predicative Dative. 391-394. Examples of Dative. lii Contents. 143-161, p. 392. . . . E. THE ABLATIVE CASE. 392. i. Uses of Ablative I. Instrumental ; II. Locative ; III. Ablative Proper. 393. ii. Instrumental Ablative. 393-394. Ablative of Cause. 395. Of Instrument : of Personal Agent. 395. Of Price. 396-398. Of Matter. 398-402. iii. Locative Ablative. 398. Abla- tive of Respect : of Measure. 399. Of Manner : of Condition: of Quality. 400-401. Of Time. 401-402. Of Place Where. 402. Of Direction. 403-405. iv. Ablative Proper. 403. Ablative of Place Whence : of Separation. 403-404. Of Origin. 404-405. Of the Thing Compared. 405-406. v. Ablative Absolute. 406-411. Examples of Ablative. 162-176, p. 407 . . . F. THE GENITIVE CASE. 407-408. i. Main Function of Genitive, ii. Its twofold Use : Sub- jective and Objective. 408. Both these dependent on one Noun. 409. iii. A] Subjective Genitive ; Possessive ; Descriptive ; Partitive. Phrases for Genitive. 410. Attributive Nature of Subjective Genitive. 411-413. Genetivus Auctoris et Possessoris. 413-415. Genetivus Descriptionis. 414. Genitive of the Fact charged. 415. Genetivus Qualitatis. 416-417. Genitive of Value and Price. 416. Construc- tions with interest, refert. 417-418. Genetivus Rei Distributae, or Partitive. 418-420. Genetivus Rei Demensae or of Quantity. 420. Genitive of Plenty and Want. 421-423. iv. B) Objective Genitive dependent, 421. on Substantives ; 421-422. on Adjectives ; 422-423. on Verbs. 423. Genitive of Cause. 423-427. Examples of Genitive. 177-188, p. 424. . . SECTION III. VERB-CONSTRUCTION. 424-425. i. The Infinitive. 426. ii. The Infinitive Present and Past as Subject. 427. iii. As Object. 427-428. iv. Prolative Infinitive : extends Construction of Verbs. Construction of Copulative Infini- tives. 428. Use of co ep it &c. with Impersonal Infinitives. Prolative Infinitive extending Adjectives. 428-429. Cases of the Infinitive, Gerunds, and Supines. 428. v. Gerundial Construction : the Gerunds. 429. Their Case-construction ; Gerundial Attraction ; their Depend- ence, vi. Impers. Gerundive Construction, vii. Personal Gerundive Construction. 430-431. viii. Notes on Gerundial Construction. 431. The two Supines Accusative Supine ; Ablative Supine. 432. Note on the Annexive Relation. 431-434. Examples of Infinitive, Gerunds, and Supines. 189-240, p. 434. . CHAPTER /F. COMPOUND CONSTRUCTION. 189, p. 434. . . SECTION I. SUBORDINATION OF CLAUSES. 434. Clauses of three Kinds Substantival, Adverbial, Adjectival or Relative. 190-193, p. 435. . . SCTION II. SUBOBLIQUE CONSTRUCTION. 435. i. Oratio Obliqua. ii. In a Clause dependent on it (i.e. Sub- oblique), the Verb is Subjunctive, iii. Virtual Oratio Obliqua. In a Clause dependent o it (i.e. virtually Suboblique), the Verb is Sub- junctive. 486. iv. A Verb dependent on Conjunctive is generally Sub. junctive. v. Exceptions to the Law of Mood in dependence. 437- Examples of Suboblique Construction. Contents. \{{i 194-203, p. 437. . SECTION in. SUBSTANTIVAL CLAUSES. 437. I) Enuntiatio Obliqua : has three Forms Infinitive Clause ; Ut-clause ; Quod-clause. 437-440. i. Infinitive Clause. 440-441. ii. Ut-clause. 441-442. Quod-clause. 442. II. Petitio Obliqua: Verbs which introduce it. 443. Quominus; Quin; Construction with Predications of Fear and Caution. 444-447. III. Interrogatio Obli- qua. 44 8 -449- Dependent Constructions with various Verbs. 444-451. Examples of Substantival Clauses. 304-227, p. 452. . . . SECTION iv. ADVERBIAL AND ADJECTIVAL CLAUSES. 452. Why taken in connexion, i. Relative Clauses, why called Adjectival ; Particles equivalent to Pronouns ; Mood in Relative Clauses, ii. Consecutive Clauses: why so called ; with ut, ut non, &c., after Demonstratives or without them. 452-453. Adverbial Con- secutive Clauses. 453. Use of Perfect Subjunctive in Historic Con- secution ; Idioms of Adverbial Consecution :Tantumabesseut... 454-457. Adjectival Consecutive Clauses ; when they occur ; after what Predications, &c. 456. Use of quin for qui non. 457. Limitative use of qui ; Occasional Definiteness of Relative with Indicative. 454-456. Examples of Consecutive Clauses. 457. iii. Final Clauses : what they express ; Adverbial Final Clauses with ut, ne, &c. 458. Demonstratives used with them ; Adjectival Final Clauses. 457-458. Examples of Final Clauses. 458-461. iv. Causal Clauses ; Adverbial Causal Clauses: of admitted Cause, quoniam, &c. with Indicative usually. 459. Of alleged Cause, quod, qui a, with Indicative, if not Suboblique ; Of conceived Cause, cum, with Subjunctive. 459- 460. v. Idioms of Causal construction; non quod, &c. ; non quin. 461. Adjectival Causal Clauses. 459-461. Examples of Causal Clauses. 461-467. vi. Temporal Clauses ; four Groups of Temporal Conjunctions. 462-463. When Subjunctive is required in Temporal Clauses. 463. Iterative Subjunctive. 461-464. Examples of Temporal Clauses. 465-467. Uses of the Conjunction cum, when. 465-466. Examples of cum with Indicative and with Subjunctive. 467-479, vi. Conditional Sentences. 467. Conditional Conjunctions ; Normal Forms of the Conditional Sentence. 468-469. Class Alpha, Sumptio Dati ; Examples. Class Beta, Sumptio Dandi. Class Gamma, Sumptio Ficti. 469-470. Various Forms of Gamma. 467- 468. Examples of the three Classes, Distinctions. 470-472. Conjunc- tive Protasis with Indicative Apodosis : Four Idioms with Examples. 472. Indicative Protasis with Conjunctive Apodosis. 473. Abnormal Relation of Tenses ; Protasis without si. 473-474. Si in various senses. 474. Si combined with Pronouns and Particles. 474-475. Idiomatic uses of Si. 475. Sive, seu. 475-477. Negative con- dition; Nisi, ni, si non. 477-478. Examples. 477-478. Conditional Sentences in Oratio Obliqua; Examples. 479. Modo, dum, dum. mo do, Conditional; Examples. 479. vii. Concessive Sentences; Concessive Conjunctions of several Classes. 480-482. Mood in Con- cessive Clauses. 480-482. Idioms of Concessive Conjunctions. 481- 482. Examples of Concessive Sentences. 482-483. viii. Comparative Sentences ; Conjunctions that introduce these. 483. Comparative Idioms. 482-483. Examples of Comparative Sentences. liv Contents. 229-240, p. 483. . . . SECTION v. SUPPLEMENT TO COMPOUND CON- STRUCTION. I. 483-486. Consecution of Tenses. 483. Consecution of Present Past. 484. Of Historic Present ; of Future with Future ; three varieties. 485. Of Future after Primary and Historic Tenses ; of Subordinated Conditional Sentences. 486. Of might have, ought, must have ; Consecution when Infinitive, &c. , intervene. II. 487-489. Narratio Obliqua, how used by Historians ; Examples. 487-488. Idioms. 488-489. Examples of the Conversion cf Oratio Recta into Oratio Obliqua. III. 489-495. i. The Reflexive Pronouns se, suus, in Clauses. 489. Ipse supplies them ; se, suus are Subjective ; is, ille, &c. Objective. Pronominal reference to be interpreted by 'the Reason of the Thing.' 490. Se, suu s connected with the use of Subjunctive : with the mind of the Subject, ii. Their use in various Clauses. 490-492. In Substan- tival Clauses : Ordinary Instances. 491. Reference when a Clause has a new Subject capable of being referred to Subjectively; Vari- ation of Reference in Clauses of Prayer, Exhortation, &c. 492. Se, suus, when referred to a Case governed by a Passive Verb. 492- 494. Pronominal Reference in Adverbial and Adjectival Clauses : in Final ; Consecutive ; Causal ; Conditional ; Relative Clauses. 494. iii. When Oratio Obliqua intervenes, iv. When in Clauses more than one Subject is referred to. 494-495. Ipse assisting the use of Reflexive Pronouns in two ways. 495. Its Appositive use ; Inter ipsos; Inter se. IV. 495-501. Participial Construction. 495-496. Nature of Parti- ciple ; want of Participles ; how supplied. 496. Uses of Participles ; Participle as an abbreviated Clause ; Attributive or Absolute. 497. Construction of Abl. Absolute ; Participial Construction abbreviates, i) Relative Clauses ; 2) Adverbial Clauses ; Consecutive ; Transla- tion of English ' without ' and Verb. 498. Final, t>y Fut. Participle ; Causal; Temporal; Conditional. 499. Concessive; with nisi, etsi, &c. ; Comparative with quasi, tamquam, &c. 499-501. Notes on Participial Construction. 241-250, p. 501. . . CHAPTER V. ARRANGEMENT OF WORDS AND STRUCTURE AND CONNEXION OF SENTENCES. 501-502. Order of Words ; Parts of Sentence. 503-504. Notes on the Order of Words. 504-505. Connexion of Sentences. 505-510. The PERIOD in Latin, Simple or Complex. 506-510. Its Style and Rhythm. 508. Subject and Object in Periods. 510. Narrative Style ; Qualities of Style. 510-511. Distinctions of Prose Style. Styles of Various Authors. 251-269, p. 511. . . PART III. LA TIN PROSODY. 511. Prosody ; Quantity and Rhythm. 512-513. Quantity of Syllables; Position. 512. Syllables long by nature or position. 513-516. Quantity of Inner Syllables. 516-520. Quantity of Final Syllables. 520-521. Quantity of Words in Composition. 521-522. Elision. 523-524. Exceptions to the Law of Elision ; Hiatus. 524-525. Metre ; Verse ; Foot ; Arsis and Thesis ; Principal Feet. 525-527. Verses : Dactylic Hexameter. List of Feet. 527-531. Caesura: Synaphea. 527-528. Technical Terms. 531-532. The Elegiac Distich ; its Rhythm. 533-546. Lyric Metres. 533. Catullus, Horace. 533-534. Iambics of Horace and Catullus ; Scazon ; Epodes of Horace. 534-535. Minor Horatian Metres ; Three Lyric Types ; Contents. ^ \ v Asclepiad Metres: 536-537. Glyconics of Catullus ; Sapphic Stanza in Horace and Catullus. 537-538. The Hendecasyllable of Catullus. The Alcaic Stanza in Horace. 538. The Galliambus of Catullus. 539-541. Table of Metres : I. Single Verses ; Dactylic Rhythms ; Trochaic Rhythms ; Iambic Rhythms. 539-540. Ionic Rhythms. 541- 543. Mixed Rhythms; Logaoedic. 543. Asynartete. Anapaestic Rhythm : Saturnian Verse. II. Strophic Metres ; Dicola Disticha. 544. Dicola Tetrasticha. 545. Tricola Tetrasticha. 546. Metres of the Comic Poets. p. 547. APPENDIX. 547-5S 1 A* Latin Orthography. 551-553. B. Latin Pronunciation. 554-555. C. Affinities in the Aryan Family. 555. Grimm's Law. 556-563. D. Ancient Dialects of Italy. 556-559. (A) The Umbrian Dialect. 559-561. (B) The Oscan Dialect. 561-563. (C) Specimens of Ancient Latin. 563-564. E. Poetic Forms and Idioms. 565. F. Supplement to Figurate Construction ( 61). 566-572. G. Money ; Weight ; Measure. 572-575. Computation of Time ; Roman Calen- dar. 575-576. Siglarium Romanum (Abbreviations). 577-582. Sup- plementary Notes : I. On Sanskrit Roots. II. On Relations in the Simple Sentence. p. 583 INDICES. I. INDEX OF SUBJECTS 583 II. LATIN INDEX 591 THE PUBLIC SCHOOL LATIN GRAMMAR. INTRODUCTION. I GRAMMAR has two chief divisions : Divi- sions of (1) ETYMOLOGY (ervfjLo\oyia, true wordformation), ^ram. the doctrine of Letters and Words. (2) SYNTAX (avvragis, construction), the doctrine of Sentences and Discourse. PROSODY (7rpo Sounds. II. MORPHOLOGY or WORDLORE, the doctrine of Words. 1 By a Primitive Sound or Root is meant one which careful in- duction assigns to that ancient, though no longer extant, Aryan language from which the Sanskrit is derived. Such induction is obtained by comparison of the Sanskrit with all other kindred languages, especially with Zand, Greek, Latin, Gothic, and Lithu- anian. See Supplementary Notes following Appendix. DIVISION I. PHONOLOGY OR SOUNDLORE. i. Soundlore treats of the sounds and relations of Sound. Letters and Syllables. 1. The Latin Alphabet now in use contains the Latin same Letters as the English, omitting W. bet? 1 *" The Letters have two forms : 1) The Capital, Uncial, or ancient form. 2) The Small, or later form, which came into common use in the eighth or ninth century: after which the Capitals were chiefly used for inscriptions, and as initial letters of sentences and proper names. 1) ABCDEFGHI(J) KLMNOPQRST 2) abcdefghi(j)klmnopqrst (U) V X Y Z. (v) u x y z. 2. Six of the Letters are VOCALES, Vowels (self-sound- ing), a, e, i, o, u, y : the rest are CONSONANTS^ Con- sonants, which are sounded only with a vowel. ' The terms Phonology and Morphology are taken from Schleicher's Vergleichende Grammatik der Indogermaniscfifn Sprockets 6 Latin Soundlore. 8-9. 3. Consonants are divided into Mutes, Nasals, Liquids,. Spirants, and Double Consonants. 1 The Nasals are n, m ; Liquids, r, 1 ; Spirants, f, h, j r s, v ; Double Consonants, x, z : the rest are Mutes. Note i. y and z are only used in words borrowed from the Greek. Note 2. i+j and u+v are two pairs ; each pair constituting one ancient letter in double form. See 12. viii. Syiia- 4. A SYLLABLE ( H o *$ o 3 | I i i W en GUTTURAL, or Throat- \ C i sounds . . . > s h X DENTAL, or Teeth- \ sounds . . . i" t d n ;. s j z LABIAL, or Lip-sounds p b m v N is guttural when it precedes e, c, or q. sounded as in English, are labiodental. 1 The Spirants f, v, if certain words of more than three syllables, when there is an interval between the ac- cented syllables. Such words are 1) Plurisy liable Compounds, in which the Middle Tone will fall generally on the first syllable, as in versipellis, misericordia, undeviginti, effrenatus, sublevare, etc. ; sometimes on the second, as in superbiloquentia, repandirostrum : 2) Plurisyllables, in which, by Derivation or Flexion, the accent of the primitive word has been shifted to a suffix. Such a Middle Tone will generally be on the first syllable ; as in Idngitudo, pdpulabundus, servitutem. This theory implies, in rare instances, the possibility of two Middle Tones, as in cdnfidentiloquius. See Corssen, ii. 824. 1 Sanskrit has two more classes of Consonants : (a) Palatal, a modification of the Gutturals ; (b) Cerebral or Lingual, a modification of the Dentals. Thus, in Sanskrit J is Palatal. 12. Semiconsonants. g vii. Memoranda from the History of the Al- History , i , of Ai- pna bet. phabet. 1. The Romans modified the form of the third Greek letter from r to C, and gave it the sound K, instead of G. The sound and letter G were afterwards introduced about 250 B.C. C. was kept as the abbreviation of Gaius ; Cn. of Gnaeus. 2. The use of C as sharp made K superfluous, and the Romans almost ceased to use it ; but it was kept in a few abbreviations : K. for Kaeso; Kal. for Calendae and Calumnia : also Kar. for Kartago. 3. The other Phoenician guttural surd Koph or Koppa (which the Dorian Alphabet of Cumae possessed) was kept by the Romans as Q, and ultimately confined to words in which parasitic u or v follows the guttural. 4. The Rough Breathing was raised to the rank of a letter, ob- taining the form and position of the Greek Eta, H. 5. The letter f was purely Italian, its ancient sound being not exactly that (which it now has) of Phi (ph), nor that (which its form suggests) of the Greek Digamma (w). In the Etruscan Al- phabet it has the form 8 ; but the Romans gave it that of the Di- gamma, (F) F. 6. Vau (V nearly = English w) was adopted by the Romans as a semi-vowel, and took the position held by Upsilon next to T. 7. There is some evidence that the ancient Romans used z (zeta), but afterwards supplied it by s or ss : so that y, z were added at the end of the Alphabet in Cicero's age to represent the Greek v, , and are only used in latinized Greek words : lyra = \vpa 9 zona = (,(i)VTf]. 8. The history of x is obscure. It appears in a few early in- scriptions : but, though in power equal to Greek (cs), it took the place and form of Chi : when and why, are doubtful points. See Corssen (Ausspr. I. 6). 9. The long vowels Eta and Omega were omitted as unnecessary. 10. The Aspirate sounds x? fy 0? as foreign to Italian utterance, were left out ; but the study of Greek in Cicero's age led to the use of eli, th, pb, which represent those letters in latinized Greek words : parochus, thesaurus, philosophus ; also of rli : rhetor. 1 1. The Emperor Claudius invented and introduced three letters : (i) J to represent u-consonant; (2) p (antisigma) to represent vp (ps) ; (3) h to represent a vowel having a middle tone between 1 and u, as in libet lubet, gradibus gradubus, maximus maxumus. They did not remain in use; but the first and last appear in inscriptions. viii. The Semiconsonants i (j) and u (v). i. The consonantal character of i (j) is shewn by the two facts, J (J). that, when it begins Latin words before a vowel it makes position in verse after words ending with a consonant, and that it makes no hiatus after words ending with a vowel or with m. Thus in Sub loue iam ius est sub, iam are long by position, and -e, -am are not elided before I. io Latin Soundlore. 12. 1) I is a vowel (i-vocalis) when it ends a syllable ; ni-ti ; or when it stands in a syllable before a consonant, in-it, sic-cis; or when it is a syllable ; ab-i-to. I is a consonant (i-consonans) when it begins a syllable before a vowel ; i e-i u-n o ; its sound being that of English y-consonant ( = German j), a faint protraction of w the vowel-sound i. 2) In Greek words, however, 161 e, Iambus, and in a few Latin words, i-ens, leram, i-vocalis remains open before a vowel. 3) The sign J was introduced in a late age, to represent i-con- sonans, and most editors do not use it. Its English and French sibilant sounds (John, Jean) are not classical, but crept in before the Middle Ages. 4) I-consonans is omitted before i by the compounds of lacio, ab-icio con-icio pro-icio re-icio, etc. ; though the long quan- tity of the first syllable is kept ; i being =j i. See Munro on Lucr. i. 34, ii. 951. In Lucr. Verg. 8ce, reice. But re-icere, Plaut. 5) Poets sometimes harden i-vocalis into i-consonans : ab-ie-te, ar-ie-te, p ar-ie-te, for ab-i-ete, etc. Sound ab-yete, ar-yete, etc., trisyll. So Horace has consil-ium ( = consll-yum), Virgil has fluv-iorum ( = fluv-yorum), trisyll. M. Lucr. ii. 991. V (U). 2. The sign V was employed by the Romans as vowel and con- sonant. In a latter age u became the vowel sign, v the consonant sign. Ifuva ( = oowa) be sounded, it appears that u-consonans ( = w) is only a faint protraction of the labial vowel u ; whence the modern name Double-u. 1) V-consonans is vocalized in cautum for cavitum, fautum for favitum, lautum for lav i turn, and in auceps for aviceps, nauta for navita, naufragus for navifragus. 2) Poets sometimes vocalize u-consonans before a vowel: sil-u- ae : sometimes they harden u-vocalis into u-consonans : gen-ua for ge-nu-a, ten-ui-a for te-nu-ia. M. Lucr. iv. 1157. 3) Parasitic u follows q, ng, and s : sequor; lingua; suavis. This usage is derived from ancient groups kv, grv, sv : but as the sign u so used neither forms a syllable nor creates position, it must be regarded, not as a proper letter, but as a kind of link between the guttural (or sibilant) and labial sounds. 1 ix. SOUND and QUALITY of the Vowels. Sound I. Vowels have not one short and one long sound only ; but ^aiit various shades of these, in close or open syllables, of a ' (Thus the sound of u varies in the following words : credulus, Vowels, btisy,fiill, use, June, and in the French words, commtin, commune!) 2. The old sounds of the Latin vowels probably differed little from those of the vowels in modern Italian. Proceeding from the thinnest and sharpest sound i, to the thickest and flattest u, the following words may represent their general distinction : the first four being pronounced as in French, the fifth as in Italian, Zuloo. Qumlne, demesne, papa, promote, Zulu. 3. The three primitive vowels are a, i, u. Sanskrit has e and o only as diphthongs arising from ai, au. 1 In many modern editions of Latin authors, V alone is used as the Capital form of con- sonant and vowel, and u alone as the Cursive form of both. In this grammar v is retained as a cursive. I2< Phonetic Decay. 1 1 1) The standard vowel is a, issuing from the throat through the opened mouth : 1 is the thin sharp palatal, sounded between the tongue and the lower palate ; u is the thick flat labial, sounded by a low interior whistle through the protruded lips. Each has its long and short sound, with shades of these. 2) The want of intervening sounds to represent the strengthen- ing of i and ii, and the primary weakenings of a, called into use two subsidiary vowels ; e medial between a and i, and 6 medial between a and ii. Both these are narrower gutturals than a ; e sounding along the upper palate and tending to the sharpness of i ; and o sounding from the lower throat with a fullness which its form marks, but tending to the labialism and flatness of u. 1 3) The strongest short vowel is a, into which none other passes. 4) The weakest is X : for which reason it often stands as a vin- cular vowel before suffixes : reg-^-to, flag-z'-to, leg-z'-bus : but sometimes e or u takes its place; soci-/-tas, teg-#-mentum. 5) That 6 is stronger than e may be seen by comparing pondus with pendere, toga with tegere, volo with, velim, velle. 6) Though u has various shades of strengh, as in put o, sumus, augur, augiirium, declining almost to the weakness of i, as in optumus (optimus, vii. n), yet on the average it is not seen to be weaker than e. Such examples as pignus, pigneris, pignoris etc., might seem to shew ii stronger than e, 6 : but it must be re- membered that this ii corresponds not to Greek v, but to Greek o : that iis is really a weak syllable, and u, like i, gives a facility to the rejection of s in old Latin poetry, which e does not afford. 7) When a vowel from being short becomes long, it is doubled in time and strength ; 11 = I, ee = e, etc. 8) As final short vowels, a and e predominate ; i, 6 are rarely final ; ii never, except by the rejection of s in old Latin poetry. As final long vowels, i and 5 pred ominate : e and a are less frequent ; and u least frequent of all. x. Phonetic Decay in old Italian language. PH ? - (See Corssen, I. 347.) netic Decay 1. Phonetic Decay tends to lighten diphthongs, to shorten and weaken vowels, to silence or throw out light vowels, to cast off or assimilate consonants. 2. This tendency is especially shewn in Umbrian and its cognate dialects ; also in the old Latin, of which our knowledge is derived chiefly from inscriptions, partly from the testimonies of gramma- rians, and from the most ancient manuscripts. 3. Classical Latin (see 5) may be regarded as in some measure 'a reaction, by which, during a long literary period, the process of Phonetic Decay in Latin was arrested. After the age of Sueto- nius, about A.D. 120, decay recommenced and continued for nearly 1000 years, till the modern Romanic languages gradually emerged from the darkness of those centuries. Vowels are here spoken of as sounded with consonants : ad, da. All vowels issue from one primary vowel, a faint sigh in the depths of the throat. Its first scarce distin- guishable strengthenings may be compared thus : max-z-mos, max--mos, max-/-mos, max- ere. (u) duc-ere .... (ii) flu-ere ... con-flu-g-es. (ou) fluv-idu-s, fluv- iu-s (from flou-v-). (u) flu-men, flu-t-are. (ii) nu-ere. (eu) veva). (u) nu-tu-s, nu-t-are ... mi-men. Add the prim, root dyu, shine ( = div), whence (6 for ii) io-cu-s. {ou), O. Diouv-ei, whence the weakened words, E. L. Diov-is, U. Juv-e, I6v-is, iuv-at, .... (u) lu-p-piter, lu-n-o, iu-c-undu-s.... b) Primitive or Italian i, strengthened by a (6, e), or by a (o, e), subsides from a diphthongal sound into I or S ; the series being X, ai, oi, ei, I (e). diic- ; lead . nu-, nod dik ; shew, div, shine T, that k^, lie down stt, smear . spic( = spy :spak), trf, three . fid, to trust lib, to choose (X) dtc-are ... dic-io, con-dic-io, die-is, caussi- dic-u-s ... iu-dex, iu-dic- ... di-dtc-i, dtg- i-tu-s, dig-nu-s ... pro-dlg-iu-m ; ... tK-r/ .... (ei) fie IK- E. L. deic-ere. (i) dlc-ere, dlx-i ... (i) re-div-ivu-s, di-u, inter-di-u-s, nu-di-u-s, dT-es, di-ur-nu-s, ho-dl-er-nu-s, di-es-piter, nun-di- na-e. (e = ai) Sk. dev-a-s, a god. (ei) 0?oc, E. L. deivos, deiv-a. (i) div-us, di-us (weak- ened form de-us), Dl-a-na, I-anus for Di- amis. In bl-du-um, trl-du-um, &c., du is a weakened form of div. (i) i-t-er, ad-i-tu-s, &c., in-I-t-iu-m. ... (5 = at) Sk. e-mi. (oi) ol-jji-o-g. (ei) d-p-t, E. L. ei-re. (i) I-re, I-bo, I-vi. ... (X) ?-s, i-b-i, I-dem.... (ei) E. L. ei-eis. (i) i-dem. (i) quT-es, quT-e-sc-ere, qul-e-tus .... (ei) ce7/m<, E. L. cei-vi-s. (i) cl-vi-s. (i) li-n-ere (-ire), li-tu-s, H-tu-ra. (ei) E. L. lei- t-er-a. (i) li-mu-s ... ll-m-ax, ll-n-ea, ll-t- er-a or li-tt-er-a. (G. schleim, Engl. slime?) (X) -sptc-ere -spec-ere ... (ei) E. L. peic-u-s. (i) plc-u-s, su-spic-io ? (G. specht. Engl. wood- pecker ; pi'e.} (X) tri-bu-s, tn-dens ... ter, tre-centi. (ei) rpelg. (i) trl-s, trl-ni, trl-du-um. 00 fld-es, fid-eli-s, per-fid-u-s .... (oi) E. L. foid-u-s, foedus, foed-er-a-tu-s, TreVot^a. (ei) 7r/0w, E. *L.feidus. (i) fld-ere, fld-us .... (X) Hb-et. (oi) E. L. loeb-er. (ei) E. L. leib-*r. (i) llb-er .... 16 Latin Soundlore. 12. c] Primitive or Italian a, sometimes represented by e, i, 6, or fi, is strengthened into a, which sometimes sinks to e or 5. (i) a (e, i, 6, u). (2) a. (3) e. (4) o. ak, sharpen ag, drive . bha \throw bha-s flight bhrag, break kar, want . gan, beget . gna, know kal. hide . lab, j/# . ma, measure pak, fasten rag, sna, float, bathe (l) a ic- ac-u-s, ac-u-ere. (2) ac-er. (4) af (i) ay-ag-ere...ag-i-li-s.... (2) amb-ag-es, ac-tu-s. (3) eg-i, ffrparryydc .... (4) paedagog-u-s. (i) fe-n-es-tra, fa-t-eri, fa-t-uu-s, infi-ti-a-s, fax fac-, fac-ere ... f ac-ie-s, fa-ber, 0d-oc, tfpi. (i) fra(n)g-ere ... frag-ili-s, frag-or, nau-frag-us, .... (2) refrag-ari, suf-frag-iu-m ...fr ac-tu-s. (3) freg-i, fprjy- .... (4) ippuya. (i) car-ere. (2) car-us. (i) gen-us ... gen-ui, ycv- yov- gen-er, pro-gen- ie-s, gen-iu-s, in-gen-iu-m, indi-gen-a, gen-i- tor, yvvi]. (2) gna-tu-s, na-tu-s ... na-t-io, natura, gna-vu-s, i-gna-vu-s .... (3) yr//crtoc. (i) no-t-a, no-t-are, co-gni-t-us .... (2) gna-ru-s, i-gna-ru-s, na-r-r-are. (4) no-tu-s, i-gno-tu-s, igno-r-are ... no-r-ma ... no-bili-s ... no- men, a-gno-men, i-gno-min-ia ... cyvwi:a. (i) cle-p-ere (cll-p-eu-s), eel-la, oc-cul-ere, cu-cul- lu-s, -cil-iu-m, c-la-m, K\OTT^. (2) cal-ig-o. (3) eel-are. (4) K\u\l/. (i) lab-are, lab-e-facere. (2) lab-i ... lab-es. (i) ma-nu-s, jucrpelv, me-tru-m, me-d-imnu-s, me- t-ere, mo-diu-s, mo-d-u-s, mo-d-er-ari. mod- es-tu-s .... (2) ma-ne, im-ma-ni-s, ma-tu- ru-s, Ma-tu-ta. (3) me-ta, me-t-Iri ... me-n- sa, me-n-sura, me-n-si-s, se-me-s-tri-b .... (4) mo-s mor-, mor-osu-s. (i) pac-i-sc-^ pa(n)g-ere, pe-pig-i, Trdy-. (2) pax pac-, pac-are, re-pag-ulu-m, pag-u-s, pag-ina, com-pag-es, pro-pag-o. (3) -pegi, 7rr/y-. (i) reg-ere, reg-io, -rigere, rog-u-s. (2) Sk. raj an. (3) rex reg- ... reg-ula (From regere perhaps rig-ere, rig-i-du-s ... .) (i) sa-tu-s, sa-t-io (se-rere) .... (2) Sa-t-ur-nu-s. (3) se-vi, se-men .... (i) na-t-are. (2) na-re ... na-r-i-s, na-s-u-s, nSs- turt-iu-m (nasum torquens), (3) i2. VowelstrengtJicning in Root-syllables, etc. sta, stand 17 star, strew, (i) sta-tor, sta-ti-m (but E. L. sta-ti-m), sta-ti-o, sta-tu-s, sta-tu-ere, sta-tu-a, sta-bulu-m, sta- bili-s : ste-t-i, super-sti-t- .... (2) sta-turu-s, sta-tura, sta-men, and in Conjug. sta-re, sta-bam .... (3) (i) ster-(n)ere ("-op-), (2) stra-vi, stra-tu-s^stra- men ... stla-ta, stla-t-ariu-s, (4) Pr. har, seize kar, create d] The following are strengthened from (i) a (e or i) to (3) e (I). (i) (h)er-us, (h)er-a, (h)er-c-i-sc-ere, hir-und-o, hir- ud-o, E. L. hir (x P~) 0) (h)er-es, (h)er-ed- (i) Cer-es, cre-are, cre-sc-ere ..., (3) cre-vi, in-cre- mentu-m .... (i) sed-ere ... as-sid-uu-s, (3) sed-es, sed-i, sed- ulu-s, sld-ere... . (i) ser-ere ... ser-ie-s, ser-a, ser-tu-m, (3) ser-ia, ser-u-s, ser-iu-s. (0 cer-(/*)ere ... cer-tu-s, ... sere-are, (3) cre-vi, dis-cre-tu-s ..., ex-cre-mentu-m, crl-bru-m, crl-men, dis-crl-men .... xpirw. (i) oreyw, TE y-oc, teg-ere, teg-es, (3) teg-ula, tex-i. (i) val-lu-m, ver-eri, vel-le, val-ere, val-idu-s, (3) vel-u-m, vel-are ... : ver-us, ver-ax .... From another root val, implying motion, come (i) vol-are, (3)vel-ox, vel-es, vel-it-ari. e) The following are strengthened from (i) Pr. a (6) to (4) o. skar, sever stag, cover var ) cover val 'choose Pr. sar, be whole svan, sound (i) sal-us sal-u-t-, sal-u-ber, sal- vu-s..., (4) sol-ari, sol-a-c-iu-m. (i) son-u-s, son-are ... (4) per-son-a. svap, sleep (i) sop-or ... som-nu-s, (4) sop-ire. svar, sun (i) ser-enu-s, a\-ac, ffe\-rjvri, Setp-ioc, (4) sol (Sk. sur-a-s). vak, call . (i) voc-are, (4) vox voc-, voc-ali-s (con-vlc-iu-m ?). /) C. cites also many examples of i (e) rising to I and of u rising to u in Latin without diphthongal accretion. Such are (a) liqu-ere ... liqu-or, (/i3) llqu-i, llqu-or. (o) sec-are ... (ft) sic-a, sic-ar-iu-s. (a) stil-u-s, stim-ulu-s ... (j(3) instig-are. (a) i/y-po-c, (/3) u-v-ere, u-m-or ... . x 1 The examples in pp. 14-17 are selected from a large number in Corssen's great work, I. 348-550. The instances cited are the most important of those in which the short as well as the long vowel occurs in words of classical use. Forms from old Italian dialects and from other languages are here given only so far as they illustrate diphthongal strengthening. Other roots of great interest will be found in Corssen's pages : as Par, pur, fill*, whence plere, plus, plenus, populus, plebs. Mar, glitter : whence mare, marmor, Mars, Mamers. yia.r,fade : whence marcere, mors, mori. Bhu, be bom : whence fu-, fore, fe-, fetus, femina, fecundus, fenus. C jg Latin Soundlorc. 12. B) Vowelstrengthening in Suffixes, Case-endings, and Personal- endings, will appear in the Sections which treat of Declension, Con- jugation, and Derivation : hon-6s honor-is, Cer-es, puly-is, nub-es, lig-6n-is, matri-mon- ium, matr-6n-a ; mens-ar-um, de-6r-um ; am-as, am-a- mus, am-a-ris, fu-e-runt, fu-I. Disyi- xiv. Vowelstrengthening in Perfects. Per- C i) Most Verbs with vowel character a, i, o, and some with e, fects - formed the Perf. in vi, and lengthened the character : na-vi, ne-vi, no-vi, ll-vi. 2) Of u- verbs, C. says that their Present-stem anciently received the strengthenings ou, u, before it was weakened into ii ; and that the Perf. passed through the forms -uvi, ui before it was weakened into ui. Thus plouo, pluo became pluo : and pluvi, plui be- came plui. The only exceptions are batuo, -gruo, metuo, ruo, which seem never to have lengthened u before a vowel : and fuo, which in the Perf. became foul (poet, f o vi), fui, and ultimately fui. 3) As to the formations caveo cavi faveo favi paveo pavi foveo fovi moveo movi voveo vovi C. thinks that (to avoid the concurrence -vui) ii was thrown out, and the root- vowel then strengthened : cavui, cav-i, cavi. 4) As to the following three sedeo sedi ; video vldi (E.L. veidi) ; venio veni he assumes the existence of old forms sed-ere, vtd-ere, ven-ere, which in the Perfect were strengthened as the following Consonant Verbs : fac- feci iac- ieci ll(;z)qu- llqui \\(n)c- vlci ag- egi fr()g- fregi leg- legi (lexi) ed- edi fod- fodi cap- cepi ru(^)p- rupi scab- scabi em- emi fu(;z)d- fudi He brings reasons against the common assumption that in such Perfects the long vowel compensates for a lost reduplication. And, in fact, the practice of Vowelstrengthening in Italian Soundlore is so well established, that no such assumption is necessary to explain the quantity. Yet fefici (Q.fefdd] is known as an older form than feci, while pegi from pango and tudi from tundo appear as secondary forms for pepigi and tutudi. We may also compare Greek forms, as ayrjyov or r/yayov with egi, icwdfj with edi, oloa with vldi or veidei, and be led to doubt whether, in some instances at least, a loss of reduplication may not have caused the root-vowel to be strengthened in Latin. Com- xv. COMPENSATION. tk>n? a ~ Compensation is usually said to happen when a naturally short vowel is lengthened in order to maintain the quantity of a syllable after the loss of a consonant: vid-sum, vlsum. But such com- pensation is not always made: seget-s, seges. i2. Nasalisation. Vowelweakening. 19 xvi. Strengthening of the Present Stem in Verbs by Insertion of a Nasal. Some Verb-stems have the short vowel of their Present-stem strengthened by NASA LISA TION ; that is, by adding n to the Stem- trowel before a Guttural or Dental, m before a Labial character : frag- frango iug- iungo Kg- ling- liqu- linquo mig- mingo nigu- ninguo pag- pango pfg- pmgo pug- pungo strig- stringo tag- tango vie- vinco fid- findo fud- fundo scid- scindo tud- tundo pis- pinso cub- cumbo lab- lambo rup- rumpo As the Nasal for the most part disappears in Derivation, it was evidently not so strongly sounded as in modern utterance. Guttural n is called by grammarians nadulterinum. (On the strengthening of the Present-Stem by Suffixes, see 52.) xvii. Vowelweakening. vowel 1. Pr. roots are formed with each of the Pr. vowels, a, i, ii : ening - but those with a are by far the most numerous. 2. The standard vowel a is weakened into i and ii in all Aryan languages : but in those which have e and 6 the weakening of a into i passes through e, and the weakening of a into ii passes through 6 : Pr. sama E.L. semo-1 C.L. simu-1 3. Italian dialects shew such weakening largely ; in Root- syllables, in Suffixes, and in Endings of Case and Person. 4. The general object of all such changes is Euphony (fi/^wi^/a), the more easy and convenient utterance of the sounds of speech. 5. In pursuit of this object certain principles are applied ; among them Assimilation and Dissimilation, hereafter noticed ; also Selection, which occurs when a certain vowel is chosen as the most suitable before a particular consonant. Thus, v has a prefer- ence for o ; 1 and the labials chiefly for u ; r for e ; n and t for i. Grouped consonants often prefer e : luvis becomes lovis volt vult epopa upupa pepiri peperi Menerva becomes Minerva aletem alitem voile velle faciundus faciendus Note. E is the easiest and smoothest Latin vowel, being neither so sharp and thin as i, nor so flat and thick as 6 and ii. Hence it prevails as a final vowel, and in several instances is so used when final consonants are cast off : venere for venerunt ; utare forutaris; dictatore for dictatore-d or dictatori-d. Also for i final in Neuter Nouns : mare for mari-. But when Masculine or Feminine Nouns drop final n, the stronger vowel o becomes final in Nom. Sing. : homo (homon-, homin-), virgo (virgon-, virgin-). c2 2O Latin Soundlore. I2 , Weak- xviii. The Vowel a and its Weakenings. of a. A) In Root and Stem syllables. 1) Corssen (II. 6) cites about 270 Latin words which have kept Pr. a in the syllable of the root or stem : acus, aqua, traho, daps, labor, pateo, madeo, maneo, ango, pando, amo, sal, valeo, palleo, malus, careo, carmen, hasta, aveo, gravis. 2) He cites about 215 words which have weakened Pr. a to e in the syllable of the root or stem : decem, neco, equos, sequor, tego, tepeo, febris, peto, edo, senex, fremo, mel, queror, tero, vespa, severus. And others which have passed from a through e to i : digitus, ignis, quinque, pinguis. 3) He cites about 190 words which have weakened Pr. a into o in the syllable of the root or stem : voco, mox, loquor, rogo, opus, 6b, nota, fodio, tono, vomo, mola, orior, voro, post, novem. And others which have passed from a through o to u : nummus, unguis, fungus, multus, culmen, vulnus. a) Pr. a is weakened to e and 6 in some roots : nex, neco, noceo ; tego, toga, bene, bonus ; mens, moneo ; pendo, pondus. fero, fors, fortis ; verto, vorto ; volo, velle, volt (vult). preces..., procus, posco; cello, collis, columen. H) Pr. a, kept in Latin, also becomes e in fatisco, fessus ; gradior, gressus. c] Pr. a, kept in Latin, also becomes 6 in apiscor, opus ; scabo, scobs ; pars, portio ; faveo, foveo. d) Pr. long a becomes 5 in some words and many suffixes : donum, vox, mos : -tor, -6s, -dp, -mdn, -on, and Imperative -to. B) In Suffixes. It may be stated as a general rule that Latin suffixes with the vowels e, X, 6, ii, are weakened from Pr. suffixes with a. Exceptions are very few : tX- in such words as menti- parti- poti-. nt- in such words as igni- pani-. vi- in words likeovi- avK tu- (su-) in Supines and Nouns, as statu-, dictu-, casu-. All which are in Pr. form. C) In Cases and Personal Endings. Cases (except the Locative Singular) and Personal Endings, with vowels e, i, o, u, are for the most part weakened from Pr. forms with a. See 20, 39, and Schleicher, Vergleich. Gramm. der Indogerm. Spr., 205. 1 12 Vowehveakening with Selection. 21 xix. Weakening into o as influenced by Se- Seiec- lection. 1. v following has determined Pr. & to become 6 in novem, novus, lovis, ovis. 2. V preceding has probably done this in voco : while in voloj volvo, volnus (vulnus) andvomo, the consonants which, follow may also have had influence. E. L. has voco for vaco, voto for veto, vorto, voltur. M. Lucr. i. 20. 3. Pr. sva is changed to so in soror (for svasar, ' sister'), sopor, socer, sonus, sol, sodalis; and has passed to sii in su-sur-rus. See p. 17. C. II. 64. 4. I* shews a preference for o before it in many words : dolus, solum, solium, tollo, &c. but especially in E. L. suffixes : poc-dl-om, tab-ol-a, Pseitd-dfais, po-pol-iis. which afterwards changed 6 into u. 5. Inner r often prefers 6 to u : fore, for em from fu-o; so ancora from Gr. ayfcupa (but generally Greek v was kept before r: pur-pur-a): especially in the Suffix of Neut. Substantives with Nom. S. iis or iir : corp-us corp-6r-, eb-ur eb-6r-. Some keep iir-: fulg-ur-, gutt-ur-, murm-ur-, sulf- ur- ; and the Masc. words aug-ur-, turt-ur-, vult-ur-. (But most Neuters in us are inflected by er-. See p. 25.) ' 6. The Comparative Suffix was anciently os 5r-, then or or-, for all genders : finally, and in C. L., it became M.F. meli-6r meli-or-, N. meli-us meli-or-. Note p. 42. xx. Weakening into u as influenced by Se- Seiec- lection. , i. C. says : ' In Latin root- syllables, suffixes, and flexional end- ings, ii has arisen generally from 6.' a) before s and m final : deus (faos), genus (ylvoc), bellum (bellom), filium (filiom). &) before inner l, or a labial : popttlus, upupa, columen, Hecuba. c) before grouped consonants, the first of which is a Liquid, Nasal or Sibilant : pulsus, palumbes, fungus, rursum, luscus. t 230 B.C. the 6 of case-endings generally p kept in some instances : a) hoc, tot, quod, quot, always. So com- con-. 2. About 230 B.C. the 6 of case-endings generally passed into ii : but 6 was kept in some instances : 22 Latin Soundlore. 12. /3) after u, v, as late as the Augustan age : equos, equom, servos, servom, aevom. So quom. The Emperor Claudius seems to have promoted the use of the combinations uu, vu, which in Republican times were generally avoided. See C. II. 97-101. 3. Rustic dialects kept o frequently : hence it returned into user in L. L., and reappears in modern Italian : popolo, secoloJ* 4. Selection of u appears A} before Labials and l : i) in place of o : humanus utrubi consul umerus bublle adulescens nummus bubulcus epistula volumus bubus exsul quaesumus rubigo titulus sumus upilio singuli Bovile is another form for bubile. 2) in place of Gr. a, e : humus (yvL\ia.i) scopulus ( &c. ; but undeci, dodeci, ... from undecim, duodecim, ... 3) On such forms as nub-es, sed-es, see 2O, 24. Some I-nouns have two forms of Nom. S., -Is and es : fel-is fel-es, vall-Is vall-es, verr-is verres; but s, like m, disappeared in L.L. and Italian, leaving e final : nube, valley &c. 4) In old Italian dialects, except O., also in E. L., final t in Verbal forms was weak and sometimes disappeared. Before it the Perfect character I was sometimes changed into e : at a later time to the middle sound ei : finally in classical times settling into T. Thus are found the various forms : (dede, dedit, dedet, dedeit\ dedit. In L. L. and in Italian, this t, like m and s, disappeared again, leaving final e ; disse,fece. C] E has a tendency to become itself a final letter in the place of other* vowels. 1) In the Voc. S. of O-nouns it supersedes 6 : doming, lupe, Romule. 2) In the Neut. S. Nom. Accus. of I-nouns it supersedes * : mare, rete ; triste, necesse. 3) When final consonants are cast off : quinque(Sk.panc'a, Gr. irivre). i2. Voweliveakening with Selection. 27 ille, iste, ipse (illus, istus, ipsus). Abl. S. of Decl. 3 : quaestore (quaestorid or quaestored). -re for runt in Perf. dedere (dederunt). re for -rls in 2nd Pers. S. Pass. : loquare for loquaris. -ve for vis in neve, sive. mage for magi s; pote for potfs. In L. L. instances occur even of a Gen. S. in e for is. By this gradual rejection of final consonants the classical system of case-inflexion was broken down and the uniform declension in- troduced which prevails in modern Italian. D] E has a tendency to take the place of other vowels before grouped and double consonants. 1) E appears before z ( = cs, gs) in the final syllable of Nouns of Decl. 3 which are inflected with the suffixes ic- i&- ( = ico- *o-, as explained by Corssen) : codex, cortex, imbrex, remex ; simplex, supplex. Gen. codfcis, corticis, remlgis ; simplfcis, supplfcis. 2) E appears before ps, bs in the final syllable of Nouns of Decl. 3, which are inflected with the suffixes ip- (up-) ib- : such are municeps, auceps, caelebs, particeps. Gen. municipis, aucupis, caelibis, particfpis. Compounds of caput, with Nom. -ceps for -cipit-s, have Gen, -cipltis ; praeceps, Gen. praecTpitjs. 3) When a Noun with that suffix ti- (which appears in hos-ti-s, tes-ti-s) would have the accent on an ante- penult syllable (ala-ti-, equo-ti-), the vowel of the penult is weakened usually into i (aliti-, equiti-), sometimes into e (abieti- segeti-). The i of the suffix being dropt, the forms then become (alit- equit- seget- abiet-) : and when the Nom. S. is formed by the addition of -s, they become (alit-s equit-s seget-s abiet- s) : but, e being preferred to i in a final suffix, (alit-s equit-s) become (alet-s equet-s). After which, by the rule of euphony, the dental falls out before s, and the Nominatives then become ales, eques ; Gen. alit-is, equtt-is; seges, Gen. seget-is; teges, Gen. teget-is. but abies, aries, paries, Gen. abietis, arietis, pa- rietis, on account of i preceding. Note. In this class, the vowels e, i generally represent Pr. or Latin a (see above), but in a few X is the root- vowel : comes, comit- (root if, to go). 28 Latin Soundlore. I2 . In pedes pedit-, probably also in seges, teges, the vowel is adopted by analogy, forming a suffix i-t- or e-t-. See Footnote, p. 30. 4) The same principle applies to a few words derived from sed- sid-, tosit(Pr. sad) : (obsed-s) obses obsld-; (praesed-s) praeses, praesid-; (desed-s) deses desid- ; (resed-s) reses resid-. 5) E before nt appears in the suffix mento- : ar-mentu-m, la-mentu-m, monu-mentu-m. and for Greek a in talentum, Agrigentum, Tarentum. 6) E is frequent before 11 : cello, pello, vello, velle, and the Demin. forms : puella: but in these i is also used : sigillum. In other groups with 1 the vowel u prevails, see xix. : but e is not excluded : celsus, excelsus. 7) Equester, pedester, for (equet-ter, pedet-ter). 8) (fat-) fessus ; (grad-) gressus. 9) The Neuter suffix (os) us weakens its vowel into e before another suffix beginning with t : fun-us fun-es-tus ; scel-us, scel-es-tus, temp-us temp-es-tas ; intemp-es-tus. The existence of an old Neuter Noun modus is shown by mod-es-tus ; mod-er-ari : so the Masc. Noun honos forms hon-es-tus, hon-es-tas : but o becomes u in ang-us-tus, aug-us-tus, on-us-tus, rob-us-tus, ven-ua-tus. maius, mai-es-tas, is like temp-us, temp-es-tas. C. forms pot(i)os, pot-es-tas : others poten(t)s (potent- tas) pot-es-tas : he cites Praern-este as Superl. from a supposed (prae- no-), meaning * the town on the highest prominence? 10) The comparative forms mag-is-ter, min-is-ter, sin-is- ter, in L. L. appear with es for is ; whence Italian maestro. In some other words also, as antes tes, L. L. writes est- for ist-. Modern Italian is not uniform in the choice between e and i. We find fermo, selva, segno, trenti ; but principe, sinistra, vittoria, carissimo. E) On the use of e for a, o, ii in the reduplicated syllable of Per- fects see xxv. i2. Vowelweakening with Selection. 29 xxii. The Selection of i. A) The thinnest and sharpest vowel i has a strong affinity with dental consonants ; chiefly with n and s, but also with t and d. B) Hence it is largely used as a vincular vowel, linking stem with suffix and suffix with suffix. C) The existence of a middle sound between i and ii caused the orthography of many words to fluctuate. A) I. Affinity of i with n. I represents Greek a before n in balmeum, bucina, fascmo, machlna, patina, trutma. v It represents Greek t before n in adamantinus, coccmus, coc emeus, crystallmus. It stands before the suffix no- in numerous Latin words : * fiscma, fuscma, pagfna, sarcma, pampmus, sucinum, fagmus, fagineus, geminus, myrrhinus. In mino- (Pr. mana) and tino- (Pr. tana) : terminus, femina ; fruimino, amaminor. crastmus, diutinus, pristinus. In the suffix In- (Pr. an L. en, en) before vowels : pect-in-is, sangu-Tn-is, osc-in-is. In the suffix in- (Pr. an L. on, on) before vowels : hom-in-is, marg-m-is, ord-m-is, virg-in-is, Apoll-m-is. In the suffix mXn- (Pr. man L. men) before vowels : flu-min-is, no-mm-is, nu-mm-is. A striking instance of the affinity of X with n appears in the fact that it was inserted in the Greek word pm, which so became mina. Similar insertions occur in Daph-i-ne^ luc-i-nus or lych-I-nus (M. Lucr. p. 211), gum-i- nasium probably in Catullus. So the affinity of ii with m is shewn in the occasional forms drac-u-ma for fymxp/, Alc-u-mena, Tec-u-messa, &c., and with i in Aesc-u-lapius, Herc-ii-les. Minerva, anciently Menerva. Though e prevails before grouped consonants, yet there are many instances of it being sharpened into i before n with another consonant : intus, inter, indu- ... quinque ... tingo ... vindico ... so when n follows another consonant : ignis, pignus, signum, tignum. 2. Affinity of i with s is shewn In the forms cinis (ciner), cucumis (cucumer), pulvis (pul-ver), vomis (vomer), pubis (puber) : also aci- pensis (acipenser). See C. II. 278. 1 In fact the suffix no- takes, in true Latin words, no short vowel but i before it. Such words as balanus, cottana, platanus, raphanus, Rhodanus are not native of Italy. 30 Latin Sound lore. I2 . In the Gen. ending -is (Pr. as). In the occasional use of i-sc- for e-sc- in Inceptive Verbs : lucisco for luces co. 3. Affinity of i with t is shewn In the adoption of i before many Verb and Noun suffixes beginning with t : ag-i-to, ag-t-te, ag-i-tis, gen-i-tus, gem-t-tus, domi-tum, meri- tum, veti-turus, doli-turus, fru-i-turus, gen-i-tor (but gene- trix), habi-tare, strepi-tare : laeti-tia, plani-ties, verl-tas, alti-tudo, pem-tus, largi-ter, sempi-ternus. 4. Affinity of i with d is shewn In the adoption of i before the suffix do- : candi-dus, torp-i-dus, flu-i-dus, viv-i-dus. herbi-dus, gravi-dus, morbi-dus, geli-dus. Note. When an E-verb forms a Substantive with suffix d-on- d-in-, the vowel before that suffix is e : albe-do, dulce-do, grave-do : but lib!- do, by assimilation. B) Use of i as a linking Vowel. 1 i. The large use of i before suffixes beginning with n, t, d, and its own aptitude for this purpose, led to its adoption before many other suffixes as a link-vowel in the place of others : as before co-, c-un-do-, eulo-, cro- ; b-un-do-, bulo-, bill-, men, men-to-, monia. (Verbalia) ali-ca, velli-co, medl-cus, rubi-cundus, cubi-culum, ridi-culus, veh-T-culum, pudi-bundus, fur-i-bundus, pati-bulum, cred-i-bilis, terri-bilis, flexi-bilis, spec-!-men, al-i-mentum, quer- T-monia. (Denominativa) auli-cus, belli-cus, annt-culus, ludi-cer, curri- culus, am-cula, aegrT-monia, caen-monia. But Verbal a is kept : ira-cundus, caena-culum, vaga-bundus, ama-bilis, grava-men, sacra-mentum. Sometimes e : vere-cunduSj fle-bilis. 1 Corssen is right in principle, when he considers this i to be a weakening of the final vowel of Stems with vowel-character ; as in auli-cus from aula; belli-cus from bello- ; ridi-culus from ride- ; am-cula from anu-. But he seems to go back too far when (II. 314 and elsewhere) he speaks, for instance, of the T in regimen as weakened 'from the original final a of the 3rd Conjugation.' He might surely have applied here and in other Derivatives of Consonant Nouns as well as Verbs the principle which he admits, for ex- ample, in ped-es, ped-it- from the root ped- (Pr. pad, Gr. rro5-), and in the use of the suffix i-co- (II. 211. 205) ; namely, that the usage of vowel-stems, which adopt! so gene- rally as a light link-vowel, has thus created a uniform stiffix (einheitliches Suffix) applied, by linguistic analogy (Sprachbewusstsein), to Consonant stems also. This is, in fact, all that is meant when the use of vowels (!, u, e) is cited in this Grammar as ' vincular : ' and in this sense the term will be still kept as convenient. The same convenience recommends the term ' Clipt Stem ' to express a vowel-stem without its vowel character. But ' mord ' is in fact the root of mord-ere. Hence, to say that momord-i, morsum, come from a theoretic verb mord-ere, as C. does, and to say that they are formed from the Root of the extant Verb, are but two ways of saying one and the same thing ; and the latter is the shorter way. 12. Vowelweakening with Selection. 2. A similar adoption of i is frequent in Compound Words at the close of the prior element. (i) terrf-gena, silvi-cola, auri-fex, signf-fer, fatT-dicus ; corni-ger, arcT-tenens, lucti-ficus ; mum-ceps, sorti-legus ; parri-cida, luc-I-fer, rur-i-cola ; (2) horri-sonus, terri-ficus ; miseri-cors ; (3) undi-que, indl-dem, sici-ne ... hidf-ne ... . Ante, bene, male vary : anti-cipo, anti-stes; but ante-cedo, ante-venio ... beni-gnus, beni-volus ; but also bene-volus ... mali-gnus, mali-ficus ; but also male-ficus .... E-verbs compounded with die ere, fa cere keep e or weaken it tog : valedicere, arefactus, tepefactus. 3. The Suffixes lo-, ro-, cro-, bro-, bulo-, tro-, tilo-, &c., often change their vowel into i before the Nom. ending s ; thus causing Adjectives in us, a, um to pass into the I -declension. gracil-us, gracil-t-s ; hilar-u-s, hilar-i-s. steril-u-s, steril-i-s ; indecor-u-s, indecor-if-s. seques-ter -tra -trum ; seques-ter -tris -tre. On this preference of i the Adjectival forms in li-s, ri-s, cri-s, bri-s, bili-s, tri-s are founded. By the passing also of 6- ii-s into i- i-s arises a double form of numerous Adjectives : imberb-u-s, imberb-i-s ; unanim-u-s, unanim-T-s decliv-u-s, decliv-i-s ; efifren-u-s, effren-I-s. In bicorm-s, u of the stern passes into i. See 28. 4. Before the Ending -bus of Dat. Abl. PL we have i for o^in quT-bus, hl-bus (Plaut.), and other old forms. \ in I-nouns, as navi-bus (nave-bos on the Duellian Column). i vincular in Cons. Nouns, as reg-i-bus, virgin-1-bus. i for u generally in U-nouns, ascanti-bus, corni-bus; except those in -cu-s, and artus, partus, tribus; which keep u. C) The last-cited examples point to that middle sound between i and u, which the Emperor Claudius wished to mark by a distinct sign. See p. 9. This exists almost exclusively before labials, affect- ing chiefly such words as the following : (1) imo- or umo- : lacrima aestimo legitimus maximus mommentum (2) Xp- or iip-, ib- or ub- : mancipium mancupium libet lubet (3) if- or iif- aurifex auriifex mamfestus manufestus lacruma aestumo legitumus maxiimus monumentum victfma existimo maritimus decimus testimonium victuma existumo maritumus decumus testumonium. recipero ritibus pontifex sacrifico recupero ritubus. pontufex sacrufico 32 Latin Soundlore. Also capital! s or caputalis and a few more words. Inscriptions shew that the forms with u prevailed in E. L. and R. L., those with i in and after the Augustan age, for which the Monument of Ancyra, as edited by Mommsen, is the best authority. Recapitulation. The principles thus laid down respecting the ad- aptation of certain vowels to certain consonants in Latin are sup- ported by the usage of other Italian dialects so far as known. See Corssen, II. 60-225. These principles affect short vowels much more than long; suffix vowels more than root vowels ; grave much more than accented vowels. The general results are : A, the strongest vowel, into which none other is changed, is not itself appropriate to any particular consonant, though its natural kinship is to gutturals first, and least to labials. O is appropriate (i) to v, (2) to l, r. u is appropriate to l and the Labials. E is appropriate to r. X is appropriate to the Dentals n, t, d, s. Again : and u are appropriate to grouped consonants. is convenient for final syllables and the end of words. E is a convenient letter for the syllable of Reduplication in Verbs. Z is adapted, by its lightness, to link stems with suffixes, and suffixes with each other. IT, e, sometimes take its place. All these appropriations arise from euphonic assimilation, in- tended to make utterance less troublesome. Again : The extensive weakening of Pr. a through o to u and*through e to i, is characteristic of Italian language. In L. L. a reaction occurred, by which o and e recovered much of their lost ground, and in modern Italian o very often appears where u stood anciently : often e where Latin had i : molto, mosca, polvere, sepolcro, fondere, romp ere, sono (sum), &c., bevere (bib ere), disse (dixit), senza (sine), verde (viridis). Assimi- xxiii. Vowelchange by Assimilation and Dis- Lndjois- similation of Vowels to each other. t!on. a By Assimilation a letter is changed so as to become the same as another, or so as to become more suitable to it. When a letter is changed so as to become unlike another, this change is called Dissimilation. Every such change has euphony for its object. Assimilation may affect adjoining or disjoined letters. It may be Regressive, when the following letter operates to change the preceding : or Progressive, when the former letter operates to change one which follows. , i2. Assimilation and Dissimilation of Vowels. 33 I. Assimilation of Vowels. Assimi- lation of A) Assimilation of adjoining Vowels. Vowels. (An adjoining vowel is never assimilated so as to be the same as its neighbour ; but only so as to be suitable to it.) a. Regressive. i) In the conjugation of the Verb-roots I, go, qu!, can, and their compounds, X before a, o, u is changed into e : earn ... eo, eunt ; queam ... queo, queunt. Z before e in their Participles is used rarely : as Nom. S. iens, quiens, but in the Oblique Cases usually ie becomes eii : euntis ... queuntis ... So iendum ... usually passes into eundum ... . As ie is an admissible combination, it is probable that the order of change was i-ont- i-ond-, then e-unt-, e-und-, which remained in this old verb after ent- end- had come in generally. Ambio, one of the compounds of eo, is conjugated like audio. 2) The Pronoun-root I (Is), and its strengthened compound idem, in the same manner change X to e before a, o, u: hence we get ea, earn, eum, eo, eos ; eadem, eandem, eundem, eodem, eosdem, easdem. 3) Deus, dea (for div-us, a, from Pr. div), is an assimilation of the same nature. In Nom. P. di (dei) are used; in D. Abl. dis (deis) ; but not dii, diis. But Diana is classical : Dean a L. L. 4) Teate, Teanum, for Tiati- Tiano- O. nausea (ravaia) ; cochlea (/coxXt'ag). but X remains in pius ... via (veha). b. Progressive. 1) By the influence of e or of \ preceding it, o is prevented from passing into u in the suffix 6lo- ; see p. 22. 2) Substantives in -ia, Decl. i., pass into -ies, Decl. 5 : avarit-ia avarit-ies ; mater-ia mater-ies. 1 3) In Numeral Adverbs, from Pr. i-yans, comes -iens (-ies) : quot-iens (quot-ies) ; dec-iens (dec-ies). 4) In Verbs the Mood-suffix ia becomes ie : (es-ia-m) = siem = sim ; (ama-S'ia-m = ama-ie-m = ama-im) amem. 1 The Fifth Declension is a mere offshoot of the First. The ending a, Decl. i., was originally long, as aquila in old Latin poetry. Hence came ie by assimilation from Ia, and, with addition of Nom. S. Ending S, ies : luxuria, luxurie-s. D 34 Latin Soundlore. 12. B) Assimilation of disjoined Vowels. (Regressive and complete always in Classical Latin.) l) u is often assimilated to a subsequent i : Aemilius consilium -cflium simnis manlbiae (aemulus) (consulo) (-culere) (simul) (manubiae) Esquiliae exilium facllis Qufris (aesculus) (exulo) (facul) (Cures) 2) O is assimilated to a subsequent i in inquilinus (incolo) | upilio (OIOTTO\OC) 3) E is assimilated to a subsequent * in Duilius (Duel-1-ius, Bellius), Brundisium (Brundesium) , mini (mehi), tibi (tebi), sibi (sebi) ; nihil (nehil), nftnius (ne-mi-u-s), unmeasured. See C. II. 366' familia (O./amel, whence famul, famulus). 1 TT is assimilated to o in so boles, when written for sii boles. is assimilated to e in bene (bono-) E is assimilated to u in tugurium (tegere). And long e to 6 in socors (secors). Dissimi- II. Dissimilation of Vowels. Vowels^ i) It has been shewn that in E. L. and R. L. u, v were avoided before u, whence such forms as vivont, avos, servom, &c., antiquom, suom, &c., continued in use to the Augustan age. TTv was not so much avoided. We find indeed floviom, conflovont in E. L., but also in R. L., Cluvius, luventius. 2) The concurrence ii was avoided in E. L. and R. L. by writing i-ei ; as fili-ei ' sons ; ' peti-ei, &c., ieis and eeis ; also adi-e^e in Senatuscons. de Bacc., but in I. L. this repugnance faded; and we find iis consiliis, &c. on the Monument of Ancyra. In C. L. ii is avoided by writing e for i in anxi-etas, ebri-etas, pi-etas, sati-etas, soci-etas, vari-etas, abi-etis ...,ari-etis ..., pari-etis ... vari-egare, li-en, Ani-en, ali-enus, lani-ena, and in many Proper Namesj Cati-enus, Labi-enus. 1 Few words have been more debated, as to their derivation and consequent orthography, thansusplcio(suspitio)andconvlcium(convltium). Each'form has good documen- tary evidence in its favour, and perhaps the strongest argument for t is that, while ci often appears in I. L. and L. L. for ti, converse examples are hardly to be found. Yet Corssen is strongly in favour of s u s p I c i o, as an assimilation of a strengthened form suspecio, and of c o n v I c i u m, as an assimilated form from convocium. Fleckeisen on the other side assumes suspltiofrom suspicitio, and convltiumfrom convocitium. Subiudice Iis est. There are strong arguments against each view ; but for the present Corssen's seems the less objectionable. f 12. Vowelweakening in Compound Words. 35 It is avoided in the compounds of iacio by casting out one i, and allowing to the other the power of ji. See pp. 10, 38. Peior is perhaps by dissimilation for pid-ior (compare /% * injure ') In the Pronouns is, Idem, the forms n, lis were avoided by writ- ing ei, eis : but li, h's were tolerated in Imperial times. 3) o-o was tolerated in I. L. But co-opia becomes copia ; and coptato is in the Lex lulia for co-opt ato. M. Lucr. v. 342. xxiv. Vowelweakening in the Second Member vowei. of Compound Words. e jt en - Com- Composition of words forms either loose or fast Compounds. pounds. If the two members are so joined that, although the first is pro- clitically connected with the second, nevertheless they can be se- parated, the compound is loose. Thus Mdrs-pater is a loose compound ; but becoming Mdspiter, it is fast; because the parts are inseparable. In old language compounds are often found in a state of separation : M. Lucr. i. 452. ob vos sacro (Festus) obsecro vos sub vos placo supplico vos facit are (Lucr.) arefacit per mihi gratum est pergratum est mihi per mihi placet mihi perplacet Such compounds as satisfacere, circumdare, c., may be considered loose ; while proficere, tradere, &c. are fast. The fast Compounds hitherto cited, Maspiter, proficere, tra- dere, weaken the root- vowel of the .second member. But this weakening, though of frequent occurrence, is not universal in fast Compounds. Thus attraho, though a fast Compound, is not weakened. We have now to see what compound words do weaken the second member of the composition. i. a) Numerous words keep their root-vowel a unweakened in the second member of their compounds ; such are most Verbs of Conj. i. : agitare, amare, gravare, vagari; many of Conj. 2. : ardere, iacere, manere, pallere, patere, pavere, valere ; many Nouns : animus, avus, faber, palma, par. Some words, as will be seen, weaken a part of their compounds, but not all: from mandare, commendo, but demando. Likewise some compounds are not weakened in earlier Latin which are weakened later : M. Lucr. ii. 951, 1135. aspargere, dispargere (Lucr.) ; afterwards aspergere, dispergere. D 2 36 Latin Soundlore. 12, &) A is weakened (through o) into u in the second member of some compounds : . before 1 : calcare . . con-culco : in- pro-culco. salsus . . insulsus. saltare . . ex-sulto : de- in-sulto. saltum . . de-sultum : as- dis- ex- in- prae- pro- sub-sultum.. Note. Satire anciently was weakened by u, dissuluit (Lucr.); but later it took i by assimilation : de-silio. /3. Before Labials : cap- . . . occupare : nunciipare : aucup- : mancup-. taberna . contubernium. lavere . . diluvies, al- col- il-luv-ies, -ium. y. After qu, by assimilation : quatere. . concutio, de- dis- in- per- suc-cutio -cussi ... quare . . cur (for quor). c. Before ss : as, assis . decussis : nonussis : centussis. Note. O (from Pr. a) is weakened into u in consul, exsul, praesul, insula, consulo. Long a is weakened into u in the suffix -ugro (-aro) : aerugo, albugo, ferrugo, lanugo. c] A. is weakened into e in the second member of many com- pounds : tarn . . autem, item. -dam . . idem, itidem ... quidem, tandem .... apisci . . indepisci. canere . . oscen, cornicen, fidtcen ... accentus .... bacillus. . imbecillus ... gradi . . aggredior ... con- de- di- e- in- prae- pro- trans- re-gredior : aggressus lacere . . illecebrae, illectus, paelex. pacisci . . depecisci (or depac-) : but compacisci. pad . . . perpetior, perpessus. fatigare. . defetigo (or defat-). fatisci . . defetisci, defessus. dare . . . addere, de- e- pro- red- tra-dere .... (Sk. dha) . abdere, con- abscon- in- sub- ere- ven-dere. parare . . (impero ...; pauper ..., propero, aequipero, vitu- pero ...?) but appa.ro, com- prae- re- se-paro. pario . . comperio, reperio: (aperio, operio ?) puerpera, vipera .... ager . . . peregre (i), peregrinus ; but peragrare. arma . . inermis. arcere . . coerceo, exerceo .... ars . . . iners, sellers, quinquertium. agere . . remex. annus . . biennis, biennium, tri- dec-ennis -ennium ..... aptus . . ineptus ; adeptus. i2. Vowelweakening in Compound Words. 37 as, assis . tressis, bessis, bicessis .... barba . . imberbis. candere . accendo, incendo ... succendo .... cantus . . accentus, concentus. capere . . particeps, princeps ... auceps, manceps .... captus . . acceptus, con- de- ex- in- prae- re- sus-ceptus.... caput . . anceps, biceps, triceps, centiceps, praeceps .... carpere . . discerpere, con- de- ex-cerpere. castus . . incestus. damnare . condemnare ; indemnatus, indemnis. facere . . artifex, opifex, carnifex. factus . . affectus ... con- de- ef- in- prae- re- suf-fectus : but labefactus . . . with many more, fallere . . refello. fassus . . confessus, dif- pro-fessus. farcire . . confercio, confertus, infercio, refercio, refertus. iacere . . obex (for ob-iex). iactus . . adiectus, con- de- dis- in- ob- re- sub-iectus lactare . . delecto, oblecto. mandare . commendo, but demando. pandere . dispendo, dispessus (but expando). parcere. . comperco, compesco, dispesco (but com-parsit). pars . . . expers, impertio, dispertio, bi- tri-pertitus (-par- titus). partus . . compertus, repertus (apertus, opertus). passus . . perpessus. patrare . . impetro, perpetro. raptus . . abreptus, cor- di- sur-reptus. , sacrare . . consecro, ob- ex- re-secro (consacro, Mon. Anc.). scandere . ascendo, conscendo, de- ex-scendo. spargere . aspergo, con- di- in- re-spergo. See p. 35. stare . . antistes, superstes (-stit-). tractare . contrecto, de- ob-trecto ; but retracto (con- tracto, Lucr.). Note. O (Pr. a) is weakened into e in potis . . hospes, sospes (pit-) ... but compos, impos. Long a is weakened into e in halare . . anhelo (redhalo, Lucr. vi. 523). .d) A, is weakened (through e) to i in the second member of many compounds : agere . . adigo, ab- ex- red- sub-igo (but circumago, perago, satago), nav-ig-o. Part. P. -actus. apisci . . adipiscor, indipiscor. amicus . . immicus cadere . . accido, con- de- ex- in- oc- re-cido ... deciduus, occiduus, ... stilicidium. - canere . . accmo,concino, prae- pro- re- suc-cino,vaticinium, luscinia caput . . occiput, sinciput, ancipit- praecipit- capere . . accipio, con- de- ex- in- per- prae- re- sus-cipio, ... praecipuus, principium ... . datus . . additus ... de- prae- pro- red- tra-ditus. 38 Latin S 02m d lore. 12. Pr. dha . . abditus, con- e- sub- ere- ven-ditus. facere . . afficio, con- de- ef- in- of- prae- pro- re- suf-f fcio ; cpp. with -ficus -ficium, beneficus ... beneficium ...,but benefacio, calefacio, and all similar cpp. facilis . . difficilis. fades . . superficies, facetus . . inficetus. fateri . . confiteor, dif- pro-fiteor, infitiae, infitior. habere . . adhibeo, co- ex- in- per- pro- red-Mbeo; but post-habeo. iacere . . adfcio, ab- con- e- pro- re- in- ob- sub-icio. On forms in MSS. with e, and on dissice, see M. Lucr. ii. 951. Iacere . . allicio, e- il- pel-licio. latere . . delitesco. manus . . commmus, emmus. nam . . . enim, etenim. pater . . luppiter, Diespfter, Maspiter. placere . . displiceo : but perplaceo. rapere . . abripio, arripio, cor- de- di- e- prae- pro- sur-ripio. ratus . . irritus. salire . . adsilio, de- ex- in- pro- re- sub-sllio. sapere . . desipio, insipiens ; resipisco. stare . . institor, iustitium, solstitium. statuere . constituo, de- in- prae- pro- re- sub-stituo. (stan-) . . destmo, obstmo, praestmo, obstmatus. frangere . effringo, in- con- per- re-fringo. Part. P. -fractus.. ^angere . compingo, impingo. Part. P. -pactus. tangere . . attingo, con- per-tingo. Part. P. -tactus. fascinare . praefiscme (i). as, assis . semis, semisses. Note, o (Pr. a) is weakened to i in potis. . . hosplta, sospita, hospltium ... . Long a is weakened into I in the suffix -Ig-o (-agro) : fuligo, robigo, uligo, &c. 2. a) E is kept in the second member of many compounds : edo, fremo, gemo, meto, peto, seco, sequor, tremo, tego,. veho, venio, gen-, ped- ; and those with er, fero, gero, sero, tero. b] E is weakened into i in the second member of several com- pounds : egere . . indigeo, indigus. emere . . adimo, extmo, per- red-imo, (but coemo). legere . . colligo, de- di- e- se-ligo. But intellego, neglego, sublego. Also perlego, prae- re-lego from legere, to read. medius . . dimidius. premere . comprimo, de- im- op- re- sup-primo. regere . . arrigo, cor- de- e-rigo. sedere . . assideo, con- de- dis- in- ob- prae- re- sub-sideo ' y asslduus, praesidium, subsidium. 12. Vowelweakening in Compound Words. 39 tenere . . abstmeo, attmeo, con- de- dis- ob- re- per-tmeo ; contmuus, pertinax, protinus, protmam. dedi . . . addldi, &c. steti . . . adstiti, &c. In close syllables compounds resume e : ademptus, collectus, compressus, directus, consessus, retentus. Long e is weakened into I in lenire . . delmio (also delenio). tela . . . subtllis. f) E is changed to ii in temnere . contumelia (contumax ?) 3. O is kept in the second member of compounds generally: convoco, abrodo. But locus . . ilico. gnotus . . agnitus, cognitus. 4. IT is kept in the second member of compounds : ac- inciibo, eluceo ; except that u is weakened into e in iurare . . de-iero, pe-iero. 5. The diphthong ae is often kept, as exaest'uo, obaeratus | but melts into I in aequus . . inlquus. aestumare . existimo. caedere . . abscido, accldo, con- de- in- oc- prae- sue- re-cldo, homicldium, parriclda .... laedere . . allldo, col- il-lldo. quaerere . acquire, anqulro, con- dis- in- per- re-qulro, inqui- sitio .... 6. The diphthong oe (ol) sinks to X in coenum 1 . inquinare, coinqumare. In E. L. it sank to u in ludere, iiti, munus, munio, punio, . etc., and their compounds. See xii. 7. The diphthong au is generally kept : inauro, adaugao: but it sinks to 5 in faux . . . suffocare ; plaudere . explodo, supplodo (but applaudo) ; to u in causa . . accuso, mcuso, recuso ; fraus . . (frustra, frustrare) defrudare : see M. Lucr. vi. 187. claudere . conclude, dis- ex- in- oc- prae- re-cludo ; and to oe in audire . . oboedire. Note. The other Italian dialects exhibit the same general laws of Vowelchange as the Latin. 1 O b s c e n u s (o b s c o e n u s) is usually derived from coenum. This, however, Is by no means certain. 4O Latin Soundlore. 12. xxv. REDUPLICATION. Reduplication in language is a practice as old as language itself. The infant from instinct or imitation forms words by repeating the syllables : pa-pa, ma-ma, ta-ta ; often unconsciously weakening the first : pu-pa, me-ma, ti-ta : and the mother or nurse amuses or lulls the infant by similar repetitions : ding-dong, by-bye, c. Various emotions express themselves in the same manner : aha J oho ! &c. See Pott (Die Doppelung]. Thus arose the habit of modifying words A) By doubling a root merely: B) By prefixing to it its first consonant and vowel. After which it came to pass, that the reduplicative syllable might be either strengthened or weakened, and the root itself weakened (rarely strengthened) after reduplication, in consequence of accentual change. A] Reduplication by doubling the Root merely : a) bar-bar-us (bulbul Pers.), cu-cu-lus, la-la-re, Mar-mar, cin- cin-nus, tin-tin-nare, ul-ul-are, cur-cul-io, gur-gul-io, fur- fur, mur-mur, tur-tur. So quisquis, utut, ubiubi, &c. fr) The Root is weakened in car-cer, mar-mor. B) Reduplication by prefixing the first two letters of the Root. (This is specially important in Greek and Latin on account of its use in forming the Perfect Tense of Verbs.) a) Without vowelchange : cu-cul-lu-s, (po-pol-u-s}, su-sur-ru-s, and the following Per- fects ; cu-curr-i, di-dic-i, mo-mord-i, pe-pend-i, po-posc-i, pu-pug-i (pu--go), scl-cid-i (sci--do), spo-pond-i (spon- deo), te-tend-i, to-tond-i, tu-tud-i. &) Redupl. weakened, Root unchanged ; in occasional forms ce-curr-i, me-mord-i, pe-posc-i, pe-pug-i, spe-pond-i. c) Redupl. unchanged ; Root strengthened. pa-pa- ver, tu-tud-i (rare). d) Redupl. strengthened ; Root weakened. Ma-mers, Ma-mer-cus, Ma-mur-iu-s, pa-pil-io, po-pul-us (poplar), pu-bl-icu-s. e) Redupl. unchanged ; Root weakened, po-pul-us (people). f) Redupl. and Root weakened. ci-cind-ela (candela), cT-con-ia ; ti-tu-lu-s ; bi-be-re (po Pr. pa, drink^ gi-gn-ere (Pr. gdn, gen, engender}, si-ste-re (sta-), se-re-re (for se-se-re, Root so). The reduplicative syllable is weakened in many Perfects by changing its vowel to e (see xxi.) : 12. Assimilation of Consonants. 41 de-d-i (da-), ste-t-i (sta-) : fe-fell-i (fallo), pe-per-i (pario), pe-perc-i (parco) : te-tul-i (tol-l-o, Pr. tal) : ce-cid-i (cado), ce-cin-i (cano), pe-pig-i (pa-;z-go), te-tig-i (ta-;z- go) : ce-cld-i (caedo). Obs. A consonant is lost in si-ste-re (for sti-ste-re), sci-cid-i, usually scid-i (for sci-scfd-i), spo-pond-i or spe-pond-i (for spo- spond-i or spe-spond-i), po-pul-are (for spo-spul-are from spolium). A vowel is lost in de-d-i (for de-de-i) : gi-gn-o (for gi-gen-o). A vowel and consonant are lost in ste-t-i (for ste-ste-i). xxvi. Changes of Concurrent Consonants. Assimi- lation of (The sign x is used to express ~ e becomes.') Conson- I. Complete Assimilation of Consonants. A) Regressive Assimilation : (q) x cq (adquiro) acquire (bm) X mm (submoveo) summoveo 77 ? ?> (quidque) quicque 77 5? 77 (sub-mus) summus () x 11 (adludo) alludo (m) J7 77 (flagma) flamma 11 ? ?? (sed-^-la) sella (nm; 77 57 (inmotus) immotus (nl) } ?> (conloco) colloco (br) X rr (subripio) surripio 7? 7 ?? (coron-w-la) corolla (") 77 7? (inrideo) irrideo 77 > J? (un-w-lus) ullus (1) ) 75 (perlicio) pellicio (as) X ss (fod-sa) fossa 77 ? 75 (ager-/^-lus) agellus 77 57 77 (adsurgo) assurgo (tn) < nn (pet-na) penna 7? 55 77 (cedsi) cessi (dn) 57 77 (adnuo) annuo (ts) 77 77 (concutsi) concussi (merced-narius) mercennarius. The following Assimilations also occur in the Composition of Particles with Verbs : (be) x cc (obcurro) occurro (bp) x pp (obpono) oppono (dc) (adcedo) accedo (dp) (adpeto) appeto (br) x && (obgero) oggero (bf ) x ff (obfero) offero (dgr) (adgravo) aggravo ( cf ) (ecfugio) efTugio (dt) x tt (adtendo) attendo (df ) (adficio) afficio (sf ) (disfiteor) diffiteor a) (nd) x nn occurs in Plautus : dispennite for dispendite ; distennite for distendite. So in Oscan ; , Sk. s-phal. Sk. s-thag, Gr. oreyeti'. Sk. s-tMras, ' strong ' : Eng. steer. Sk. s-ku, to hide. for other instances, see Corssen I.: also pp. 14-17. a) Tuli, fidi, scfdi, cast off the syllable of reduplication. /3) Sum, sum us, sim...cast off the initial vowel e. y) When the Verb-form est follows a word ending with a vowel or m or with s after a vowel, it often loses e, and attaches itself enclitically to the preceding word. This occurs chiefly in the Comic poets, but also in later writers both of prose and poetry, and on Inscriptions: itast, ibist, quomst, quidemst, temulentast, nactust for nactus est, culest for qualis est (Plaut.). The Second Person, es, is subject to the same change, but not after m: homos for homo es, meritus for meritus es. xxviii. Loss of Final Letters A) Final e is dropt : a) By enclitic ne : men for mene, tun for tune, dixtin for dixtine : quln (qui-ne), sin (sl-ne). Sometimes the word before ne loses s : am for aisne, viden for videsne, satin for satisne : b) In ceu, neu, seu (ce-ve, ne-ve, se-ve or sive). c) In the Imperatives die, due, fac, fer (dice, &c.) So, in poetry, + conger for congere ; inger for ingere. d) NeuterfSubstantives in ale (all-), are (ar-l) drop g (l) and shorteii a : toral for torale; calcar for calcare. But they resume a in the increasing Cases : toralis, calcaris. Loss of Final Letters, 46 Latin Sound lore. I2 - e) Many other I-nouns clip i in Nom. Sing., some without taking s: (par-i-) x par ; others before they take the s: (stirpi-) x stirp-s, (arci-) x arx. f) Facul for facile. g) Acforatque; necforneque: mage for magi s. h] The Pronoun hie, with the Adverbs hie, illic, istic, hinc, illinc, &c., have dropt e. Thus illinc is for illimce. Note. Ab (a:ro), sub (VTTO) have lost a final vowel. E) Final Consonants are sometimes lost : a) Substantives with final on drop n in the Nom. Sing., resuming it in the Oblique Cases : ratio, virgo; Gen. ration-is, virgin-is. V) A final Consonant has been dropt in Ace. and Nom. S. by the following Neuter Substantives : cor (cord-) Gen. cordis (Gr. icap&'a) far (fars-) farr-is (for fars-is) fel (felt-) fellis (Gr. x*oc) lac (lact-) lactis (Gr. ya-Xa/jr-) mel (melt-) - mellis (for meltis, Gr. /xe os (ost-) ossis (for ostis, Gr. oareov) c) The Latin Ablative S. cast off final d : (praeda-d) x praeda : (Gnaivo-d) x Griaeo (dictatore-d) x dictatore : (mari-d) x mari (senatu-d) x senatu Also Adverbs in e and some Prepositions : (facilume-d) x facillime ; (exstra-d) x extra. d) On -re for -runt and for -rXs in Verbs, see xxi. vene-re for vene-runt ; uta-re for uta-ris. e) Particles often drop final letters in composition : amb- am- for ambi ; co- for com- ; di- for dis- ; pro- for prod- ; re- for red- ; se- for sed- ; tra- for trans. So hau for haud or haut : hau-scio for haud scio (Plaut). Pos- (pos-t) drops s in pomoerium, pomeridianus. The Prepositions a for ab, e for ex, are long by Compensation. C) Consonant and Vowel, or Vowel and Consonant, are dropt. dein, exin, proin for deinde, exinde, proinde, Cic. Or. 45. nihil for nihilum : n on for (noenum ne-unum) ; sat for satis. O-nouns with Nom. er have dropt os (us) : magister for magister-os. famul (O.famef) for famulus, Lucr. iii. 1048. Note. The three consonants oftenest final are m, s, t. All these fell off frequently in E. L. (Roscio for Roscius and for Ros- cium), again in L. L., and ultimately in modern Italian. See p. 26. i2- Loss of Inner Consonants. 47 Final m, with its vowel, was so weak that poets took no note of it metrically before a word beginning with a Vowel. Thus in Virgil's verse monstra/ft ^orrendz/;;z informs ingens cui lumen ademptum the letters printed in italics do not count in the metre, and the verse runs thus : monstr orrend inform ingens cui lumen ademptum. Final s, on the other hand, after a short vowel, was neglected by poets as late as Lucretius before words beginning with a consonant, as testified by Cicero in the following passage : < Ita enim loqueban- tur : Qui est omnibu' princeps, non, omnibus princeps : et, Vita ilia dignu' locoque, non, dignus, Or. 48. He also testifies that this weakness of s had existed in common parlance even when the vowel before it was long : i Sine vocalibus saepe brevitatis causa contrahebant, ut ita dicerent, multi' modis ; vas' argenteis ; palmi' et crinibus ; tecti' fractis/ Or. 45. Final t also was often dropt in ancient Verb-forms : dede for dedit. See p. 26, and C. I. 188. xxix. Loss of Inner Consonants by concurrence LOSS of with other Consonants. 1 CoTso- nants. When this loss occurs for euphonic reasons, if a syllable pre- viously long by position alone is left short by the removal of one consonant, compensation is often made by lengthening the vowel : (pic-nus) x plnus : but not always ; (lac-nius) x lanius. The sign of length (-) will here shew the compensated syllables. A) Exclusion of Guttural Mutes. i. A Guttural Mute is excluded in Verbal formations when it occurs between a Liquid and one of the letters s, t, in, (fare-si) xfarsi x fulsi (differc-tum) x differtum (fulc-tum) x fultum (sparg-si) x sparsi (indulg-si) x indulsi (torqu-tum) x tortum (indulg-tum) x indultum (torqu-mentum) x tormentum (fulg-men) x fulmen 2. Occasional instances of Gutturals excluded : c between n and a Dental Mute : quintus (quinc-tus) quindecim (quinc-decim) But quinctus may be kept, as tinctus, sanctus. c before m : lama (lac-) ; temo (rex-) ; lumen (luc-). c n : aranea (dpa^-vrj) ; lana (lac-) ; planus_ (TT\CLK-) rana (rac-) ; vanus (vac-) ; deni (dec-) ; luna (luc-) ; qulni (quinc-), in which n before c is also cast out. 1 Many combinations are troublesome to utter: guttural with labial mute, or labial mute with guttural ; surd with its sonant, or sonant with its surd, and so on. When the addition of a suffix in derivation produces such combinations, they are usually avoided by excluding the first consonant : scalprum for scalp-brum, ful-crum for fulc-crum, &c. 48 Latin Soundlore. 12. c before s : ursus (Sk. arksfas, Gr. a/>/cro<;). g j : aio (ag-io) ; maior (mag-ior) ; Maius (Mag-ius) ; puleium (puleg-ium). g 1 : moles (/-toy-) but molestus ; plla, pillar, pier (pig- ? comp. pepigi). e m : contaminare (tag-) ; examen (ag-) ; flamen (flag-) ; rlma (rig-, riwgi); iumentum (iug-, iu;/gere); sumen (sug-). g v : mavis, mavult (mag-e-) ; levis (leg-vis) ; brevis (breg- vis). x d : sedecim (sex-decim). x n : seni (sex-ni). x v : seviri or sexviri. (tex-).' The same principle applies in ala (ax-); mala (max-) ; palus, pala,. (pax-) ; talus (tax-). See Cic. Or. 45. B] Exclusion of Dental Mutes, i. Dental Mutes often fall out before s. i) In the Flexion of Nouns. Dental Mute Stems, including Pres. Participles in n(t)s, are by far the most numerous class in the 3rd Declension : and as all but a few take the Nom. S. ending s, they drop the dental t or d before the sibilant : (virtut-s) x virtu-s; (comft-s) x come-s (custod-s) x custo-s ; (vad-s) x vas (part-i part-s) x pars ; (dent-i- dent-s) x dens. The rule of quantity here is, that long stems remain long, short remain short, in the Nom. S. : excepting (ped-s) pes with its compounds, (vad-s,) vas, abies, aries, paries for (abiet-s, &c.) with a few Greek words which drop n as well as t ; elephas (elephant-s) ; Simois (Simoent-s) See 24. Syllabus. 1 Since x=cs or gs, the changes from x to s in Sestius (Sextius), sescenti (sexcentiX mistus (mixtus), are really instances of the loss of a guttural mute before s ; of c in the first two examples, of g in the third (/nty-). Again discere (dic-sc-ere), miscere (mig-sc-erej are similar omissions before sc. This seems to justify the assumption that when x falls out before 1, the c departs first, then the s : tex-la, tes-la, tela and so in the other instances. That s would fall out before 1 is shewn in qualus (quas-), plla, mortar (pins-), and in Fr. Bale (Basle). Corssen however (I. 64) confines himself to saying of these instances that x falls out before 1, m, and that c does not fall out before 1. The alternative above stated he does not notice. i2. Loss of Inner Consonants. 49 2) In the Flexion of Verbs. a) A certain number of Verbs throw out d, a few t, before the Perfect Suffix s-i : ardere (ard-si) arsi ludere (lud-si) lusi ridere (rid-si) risi radere (rad-si) rasi sentlre (sent-si) sensi flectere (fleet-si) flexi Assimilation occurs in cedere (ced-si) cessi and its compounds, de cut ere (decut-si) d ecus si, with other compouA Is of quatio. Compensation occurs in none but dividere (divid-si) divlsi- ; mittere (mitt-si) misi. U) In the Supine formation also the Dental is often lost. When- ever t or d is brought before the suffix turn, that suffix is changed to sum. But whether stem or suffix parts with its dental first, is a disputed point. Corssen's order is t-tum (or d-tum), -s-tum, -sum. However this be, t-tum (or d-tum) usually becomes -sum, losing the Dental : (vert-tum) versum ; (cud-turn) cusum ; (sent-tum) sensum ; (rad-tum) rasum. But -ssum by Assimilation in a few Verbs : sed-ere sessum ced-ere cessum fod-ere fossum fat-eri fassum fi(;z)d-ere fissum pat-i passum met-ere messum sci(;z)d-ere scissum grad-i gressum Also mitt- ere, missum, which drops t between two Dentals. Compensation occurs in a few Verbs with their Compounds, vid-ere vlsum ed-ere esum 6d-ere osum cad-ere casum fu(^)d-ere fusum (also gavlsum from divid-ere divisum tu(^)d-ere tusum gaudere = ga-vid-ere) Obs. i. Observe also that -turn of the Supine becomes -sum after these combinations, 11, rr, re, rgr : fall-ere falsum ; curr-ere cursum ; parc-ere parsum ; sparg-ere sparsum. Obs. 2. The euphonic rule for Dentals before the suffix -turn in Supines applies equally to Dentals before Noun-suffixes beginning with t in Derivation : (tond-tor) tonsor ; (vert-tura) versura ; (offend-tio) offensio ; (cad-tus) casus. 2. Occasional Exclusion of Dental Mutes. d before c : (hod-ce) x hoc ; (quod-circa) x quocirca. grn : a-gnoscere, a-gnatus, &c. m : cae-mentum (caed-) ; ra-mentum (rad-). _ _ n : fi-nis (fid-). v : sua-vis (suad-). E 5 -vowel, rarely into a diphthong. a) If the concurring vowels are the same, the same vowel lengthened results from their contraction : (co-opis) x copis (tibi-i-cen) x tiblcen (pro-oles) x proles de-eram x deram (dii) x dl de-ero x dero filii x fill (Gen. S.) de-esse x desse ^) If the vowels differ, the former usually absorbs the latter. co-alescere x colescere (semi-as) x semis (pro-emo) x promo, (de-igo) x dego fili-e x fill victu-i x victu si-em x sim (indu-itiae) x indutiae (ama-im, ame-im) x amem In some instances, the latter absorbs the former : (ama-o) x amo diei x dn as well as die (fu-io) x flo (glacie-alis) x glacialis. ) Remarkable contraction of a with parasitic u appears in cur for (quor) quare ; and culest (Plaut.) for qualis est. 1 (On Contraction after exclusion of Spirants, see xxxiv.) 3) Thirdly : Hiatus is avoided in poetry by Coalition ; which Coali- grammarians called 2vj'ii?# KCU re quis to Tt'c (U.flis). Some think that ^ should always be assumed as the primitive of qu ; but Corssen maintains that c (k) could develop u after it in Italian language as a transition-step to the labial p : and he thinks that even in Indie kv is developed from k. 3) The Labialism by which TT and p represent Pr. , prevailed in Umbrian and Oscan. U. ^/^^//r^z/5-^quadrupedibus ; O. ///^z/ = quidquid. Hence (from O. petora, four) come the names Petreius, Petronius: and (from O./d?;;/-/-w = quinque) Pon- tius (=Quinctius), Pompeius, Pompeii, Pomponius, Pom- pilius. 1 4) Jn two instances c, qv seem to correspond to Sk. p, Gr. TT : L. Sk. Gr. coquo pac' TreV-ro; quinque pane' a irei'Tt, irlpTTE. Here some think the primitive roots were kak or kvak; kanka or kvankva. Fick, however, supposes coquo to be for (poquo), quinque for (pinque), by assimilation. 5) In proof that qu could be developed from c, Corssen cites huiusque for huiusce ; inquilinus from incolo ; inquinare from coenum ; quom = cum; querquetum for quercetum ; Qui- rites from Cures; sterquilinium from stercus. 1 Perhaps other instances of Labialism (p for k) in Latin are dialectic (Sabine) : as lupus (Sk. var-kas\ Gr. Av'/co?) ; popina for coquina ; palumbes = columba : Epona (forEquona) ; spolium (Gr. JKIT, Kwcepwv. 2. Latin represented Greek K by c before e, i, y : as Cecrops, cerasus, Cilix, Cimon, cithara, Cybele. 3. Gothic represents c by k before these vowels : as kerker, keller, kirsche. 4. Quintilian cites chenturiones as away of spelling centuriones. An Inscription A. D. 326 gives schenicos for scenicos, and also scenicorum. Another, A.D. 408, has pache for pace. 5. Qu could not represent an assibilated c ; therefore such forms on Inscrr. in L. L. as {on the one hand) huiusque for huiusce ; requiesquet for requiescit and (on the other) sic is for siquis ; cintus for quintus shew that up to their date ce, ci kept the hard guttural sound. 6. In the imitative verbs crocio, glocio, c must have had the hard sound. 7. Finally, no grammarian has told us that c was uttered in one way before e, i, in another before the remaining vowels. This silence goes to prove that no such difference existed in C. L. In the Umbrian and Volscian dialects there had existed a soft 5, as U. fafia, V. fasia, for facial. And in the late Imperial times such tendency dawns in a few words on Inscrr. : provinsia for provincia ; Luziae for Luciae ; Felissiosa for Feliciosa. But it was not until the yth century A.D. that popular utterance so far relaxed its energy as to adapt generally the guttural consonant to the palatal vowel, and propagate that sibilant sound of ce, ci which, for instance, transmutes the classical Kikero into It. G. Fr. Eng. Chichero Shishero Sisero. II. The assibilation of inner ti before: a vowel began earlier. It had existed in dialects : that etiam was p mat etiam was pronounced eziam. in me next century we meet witn a/erio lor actio, Constanzo for Constantio : soon after with iustiria, milizia, preparing the way for modern Italian, which writes Firenze (Florentia), Piacenza (Placentia), palazzo (palatium). I2 . Relations of Consonants, etc. 6l II. The Guttural Sonant G. 1) G usually corresponds to Sk. j or gr, Gr. 7 : G. L. Sk. Gr. gen- jati yer- yov- ag-o #/ dy- teg-o sthag orc'y-w Sometimes to Sk. /, Gr. K : viginti vins'ati FeiKovi. Sometimes to Sk. kh, h, Gr. x> y ' unguis nakhas ow\- li(n)go lih Xa'xw ego aham cyu> 2) Parasitic u follows gr in anguis, sanguis, unguis, lingua, linquo, stinguo, tinguo, unguo, urgueo. In pinguis (?ra- X^c) u is a suffix. In all these, except urgueo, the guttural n adulterinum strengthens gr, giving it a nasal twang : as in the Verbs cited p. 19. 3) G was guttural in C. L. ; as in Eng. go, gave, give, get, beget, begin. Its palatal assibilations before e, i, whether hard, as in Eng. gentle, giant, rage, It. gentil, Ginevra, gioia, ragione, or soft, as in Fr. gentil, geant, gtte, rage, began towards the 5th century with the use, as in Italian, of gi ( = Eng. j) before another vowel : Giove, Giulia, giallo. II L The Aspirates : h, f. It belongs not Only to Indie language but also to Greek to aspirate the medial mutes gr, d, b, as well as the tenues k, t, p. Thus arise the medial aspirates gh, dh, bh ; to which the partially corresponding sounds in Greek are x> #> > severally. Latin has neither class of aspirates : the letters which it uses for the purpose of correspondence are principally h, f, and the medial b. i. H, when sounded at all, was sounded as the Greek Rough H. Breathing, but corresponds to it only in words borrowed from the Greek : Hebe, Homerus, hora, &c. a) In some words h corresponds to Sk. h, Gr. % ' as L. Sk. Gr. hiemps himam X^ct heri hyas X^'e veho (via) vah o X ew ans-er (for h-ans-er) hansa x ?, goose Oxcu'0--) 1 1 The Teutonic names of this bird, goose, gander, gos (Anglo- Sax.), gans (Germ.), com- pared with the Greek x^"> seem to shew that ghans is the Prim. form. There can be no doubt that Greek x indicates a Prim, gk in all these words : and this is also shewn in the Latin Perf. of veho : vexi for vegh-si. 62 Latin Soundlore. 5 12. b] H represents dialectic fin some words, as haedus, hario* lus, hircus, hordeum, horreum, hostis, also in mihi. So in Spanish, ^?y^? = filius ; 7/rt/rtr = fabulari. c) H has no position in Latin metre ; and a tendency to get rid of this aspirate, as a troublesome sound, is manifest in the history of Latin. Hence the fluctuation in the orthography of many words in MSS. and Inscrr. : harena, arena; harundo, arundo; haruspex, aruspex ; have,ave; haedus (aedus) ; hariolus (ariolus) ; Ha- dria (Adrici)\ heres (eres); herus, hera, and erus, era; hedera (edera) ; holus (olus) ; Hammon (Ammon) ; Hister(Ister). But the forms humerus, humor, &c. for umerus (O>/AOS), umor (from uvere), are not good. c) The loss of h, was propagated in L. L. Hence in modern Italian it is not sounded, and has generally disappeared as an initial letter. F. 2. The Italian Labiodental Aspirate f is described by Quintilian as a very strong rough sound : 'Ilia quae est sexta nostrarum paene non humana voce vel omnino non voce potius inter discrimina den- tium efflanda est,' xii. 10. This description does not seem to imply that the ancient pronunciation of f was materially different from our own : but it does imply what is probable on other grounds, that (f> was different from our f, not, like this, labio-dental, but a pure labial aspirated. F is seldom the inner letter of a root. As an initial it corresponds to Sk. bh, Gr. <, chiefly : Sk. dh, Gr. 9, some- times; Sk.g/i, Gr. x, rarely. L. Sk. Gr. i) fero bhar >a> fui (fe-, &c.) bhti flag- (fulg-) bhrdj frigo bhrajj fugio bhuj frater bhrdtar See bha, p. 16. To Pr. bh, C. also refers the f in many words : fovere, favilla; favere ...; famulus ... (O. faama^ 'house'); fervere ... furere ... ; fidere .. ; fiber; forare; furvus; fundus ... ; frequens: compare also fagus (?yoc); folium ($V\\QV)\ frango frigus (f 2} foris dvdr Ovpa fumus dhumas QVOQ rufus (rudti) epvdpog firmus dhar (Oa\- Oe\-) 1 From this last root C. deduces a large number of words : fere, ferme, frenum, forum, furca, fulcio, &c. 1 Lat. -fendo, Gr. 0eu'u> are referred to Sk. han. Probably on this account Prof. Monier Williams, in his Lexicon, refers han to a Prim. dhan t though so many of its forms indicate an original ghan. 12. Relations of Consonants, etc. 63 The Preposition af which appears in Latin Inscrr. is by Cors- sen distinguished from ab,and derived from Sk. adhi. L. Sk. Gr. 3) fel (comp. bilis) (hart, ' greenish yellow ') ^0X77 fu()do (ghuf) xefo> To Pr. gli C. refers fulvus (helvus), host is (fostis), hario- lus ('inspector of the hira or entrail'), haedus (faedus), hordeum (fordeum), fames, far, frio, furfur. IV. The Labial Mutes p, b. Labials P, B. These were sounded anciently as in modern language. P corresponds generally to Pr. p, Gr. TT. But see I. B corresponds often to Pr. b, Gr. ; but, as already shewn (I. and III.), it has several other special relations. Thus it is developed not only from dv (as in bis, bellum, bo- nus, see p. 45), but also from gv : L. Sk. ,Gr. bos, bov- gaus povs faba (bhas, ' eat ') ), ambi- (afi), sorbeo (po), umbilicus (o/uf^aXos-) : in the suffixes -bus (- -bam, -bo, -bro, -bra, -bulo, -bill, -bi (tibi, sibi, ubi, &c.), -bis (nobis, vobis). Again b = (dh) in ruber (Ipvd-), plebs (77X^09), and in abies, arbor, urbs, verbena, verbum, barba, &c. V. The Dental Mutes t, d, retain their ancient sounds, corre- Dentals spending to Sk. /, d (or dh), Gr. r, 8 (or 6). a) The sonant mute stands regularly for the aspirate in medius (Sk. madhyas, Gr. ^a-o-os for /xeS-yos), vidua (Sk. vidhavd), -dere (Sk. dhd, Gr. Be-). In latere (\adelv), pati (Tra6tlv), t seems to re- present Pr. dh ; but this is very exceptional. b) Final d in C. L. is only used in a few particles (apud, ad, haud, sed), and pronouns (id, illud, aliud, quod, quid, quid- quid, &c.). Some of these are occasionally found in MSS. and Inscrr. with t for d, as aput, haut, set, aliut. This shews that final d had a hard sound. On final t, see p. 26. c) The assibilation of inner di, as of ti, before a vowel, began in the Imperial age, and is represented in Italian by zz, as mezzo for medio. 64 Latin Soundlore. I2 , Nasals VI. The Nasals n, m, correspond in sound to Pr. n and m f N, M. Gr. v and p.. a) W has in Latin a twofold use : 1) As a Dental ; initial, final, and before a vowel : 2) As a Guttural (adulterinum) ; before g, c, qu. It is weak and slightly uttered before s and ts, especially when these are final. See p. 50. Z>) In Latin the Labial Nasal m often takes the place which belongs to v in Greek as a final suffixed Consonant : (jjLovffav) x musam ; (currjv) x aberam. (^ovtnS-wv) x musarum ; (Sopwv) x domorum. In the First Pers. Plur. of Act. Verbs s corresponds to v \ (eloper) x vidimus. In the Third Pers. Plur. nt : (a?rf/ rivus (pooe), taurus (rai/pos), &c. i2. Relations of Consonants, etc. 65 4) In Latin words the order Mute- Vowel- Li quid often appears where the corresponding Greek forms have Mute-Liquid-Vowel : bardus ((Bpadvs), caro (/c/aeas-), cerno (KpiVa>), dulcis (yXv/cvs-), pulmo (7rAev/ia>z/), sorbeo (pocea>), torqueo (rpe'7ra>). So tri and ter, trinus and ternus, porro for (protro), &c. 5) Frequent interchange is found between the Liquids and the Dental d : d and 1 : lacrima (SaKpv, tear), lingua (E.L. dingua^ 'tongue'), levir (Sk. devar, Gr. Scuyp), olere (oSoo&z, odor), Ulixes ('oSucra-evs), adeps Meditor (jueXeraoo) is not so certain. d and r : meridies for (medi-dies) ; and ar- for ad in old compounds: arbiter (ad-bitere), arcesso for (ad-ci-esso). 6) As to the sound of l, we learn from Priscian the opinion of the elder Pliny : < ! triplicem, ut Plinio videtur, sonum habet : exilem, quando geminatur secundo loco posita, ut ille, Metellus; plenum quando finit nomina vel syllabas, et quando aliquam habet ante se eadem syllaba consonantem, ut sol, silva, rlavus, clarus; medium in aliis, ut lee turn, lee tus/ I. 7. 38. 7) The lightness of inner 1 caused it to be often sharpened by doubling : loquella, querella, &c. 8) On its affinity to u, see xx. In French this goes so far that u often takes the place of l, forming diphthongs au, eau, eu, ou : (ad illu) x au ; (ad illos) x aux ; (alter) x autre. (cheval-s) x chevaux (chevel-s) x cheveiix. (bel) x beau ; (castellum) x chateau ; (fol, mol. sol) xfo2t, mou, soil. a) No relation is more important in Latin Wordlore than that R and which arose between the letters r and s, changing the sibilant s - between vowels into the canine liquid. Varro mentions it : ( In multis verbis in quibus antiqui dicebant s postea dictum r, ut in carmine Saliarium sunt haec : ... foedesum, plusima, meliosem, asenam/ vii. 26. In the Carmen Arvale the Lares are called Lases. Cicero says (Fam. ix. 21) that L. Papirius Crassus was the first to call himself Papirius (B.C. 336) : before which all his clan were called Papisii. So the Auselli became Aurelii, the Fusii Furii, the Numisii Numerii, the Pinasii Pinarii, the Spusii Spurii, the Volesi Valerii, the Vetusii Veturii. Thus we have Halesus, Falisci, and Falerii ; Etrusci, Tusci, and Etruria. Hence in roots these changes appear : (asa) x ara; (asena, fasena) x harena; (fesiae) xferiae ; (nases) x nares, comp. nasus ; (geso) x gero ; (hausio) x haurio ; (seso) x sero; (uso) x uro ; (hesi) x heri, comp. \Qig y hesternus. So spes andspero; quaero and quaeso ; vis, vires; glis, gliris ; flos, floris, &c. ; nefarius from nefas, &c. F 66 Latin Soundlore. . I2 . Hence almost all the Noun-flexions in r-, as er- or- dr- fir- from Nominatives in es, is, iis, 5s (or), us, belong to stems which are really not r-stems, but s-stems : the old forms, many of which are found in old Inscrr., being, for instance (aesis, foedesis, pignosis or pignesis, arbosem, floses, plusima, maioses), &c. The Case-endings -arum -oruzn were (-asum, -osmri). The Verb-forms -eraxn -ero were (-esam -eso\ -ris -re -ri were (-sis -se -si). In the Passive endings -or -ur, &c., r represents the pronoun se. Dir-imo is for dis-emo, dir-ibeo for dis-hibeo. ) The r for s between vowels very often corresponds to the loss of Greek a between vowels : (ausosa) x aurora (av-we, Sk. ushas); (ausis) x auris (ov (visus) x virus (f/-oc, SL-mto); (nusus) x nurus (rvoc, Sk. snushd (sosor) x soror (a-ap, Sk. s'vasar, ' sister'); (genesis) x generis (yeVe-oe) ; (musis) x mu-ris (^uv-oc) ; (deasum) x dearum (flca-wy) ; (esam) x eram (e-TJjv), &c. c) H is for s before a consonant in Minerva(Sk. manas^ 'mind ') ; verna (Sk. vas, ' dwell') ; veternus from vetus, diurnus, hodi- ernus from dies : And as final in the ending or for os : color, honor, labor, &c., for colos, honos, labos, &c. S. ad) The Greeks, who avoided sibilation as much as possible, sub- stituted generally the rough breathing for primitive s at the begin- ning of words. Not so the Italians. Hence Latin initial s before a vowel corresponds often to Sk. s, Gr. aspirate : salix (fXtV-rj), sex (e), sedes (e^oc), semi- (??/"-), serpo fa), si- mul (/*> o/zov), sollus (o\oe), silva (v/Vr;), se (e), suus (cfos), suavis ' (f/c^c), sub (v^-o), super (v:rep), sudor (^pwc), sus (vg), &c. Sometimes initial s corresponds to Greek ' spiritus lenis : J si (a)> sero (eip w )> serum (opdc). bb) Sc, sp, st initial generally correspond in Greek and Latin, unless s is dropt, as in t ego (oreyw). See p. 45. cc) S initial was probably sounded more sharply than as an inner letter : hence caussa as well as causa appears in MSS. and Inscrr., and other occasional doublings of s are found. dd) S falls out in Cerealis for (Ceresalis) ; in ver (e'-ap for FfVap) ; in vi-m, v-i ; in the cases of spe-s for (spe-r-es = spe-s-es), in those of dies, diei for (die-s-i), &c., and in other forms. Jhe VIII. The soft Labial Spirant V. Spirant a) v-consonans has the same relation to f that b has to p : it corresponds to Pr. v, Gr. digamma, like which it was sounded : and this sound was probably that of Eng. w. 1 Corssen thinks its 1 That Latin v-consonans had the sound of English w always, is probable for the following reasons : i) By a slight change in the position of the speech organs the vowel i passes into y-cons. By a precisely parallel change the vowel u becomes, not Eng. v, but Eng. w. i2. Relations of Consonants, etc. 67 initial sound was that of Eng. v, its inner sound that^of Eng. w. L. Sk. Gr. vomo vain fe/ic'w VOlvO VCil F\V(M) voco vac' Fe7T(jj video vid (' know ') p t3- vestis vasts novus navas ovis avis 6Fig So vis (Fie), viola (Piov), vinum (Folvog), bos bov- (fiofg fiovg), navis (yafe, yavg), ver (f*/p), vespera (Fevirepa, effTrlpa), Vesta (FeffTta, lorm), radix (Fpia, p/a, /3p/a), &c. ) As the Greeks lost the use of /, they represented initial v sometimes by ov, sometimes by /3, Varro (Ovappcov or Bdppav). On the vocalization of v see p. 10 ; on its omission, see pp. 57, 58. IX. l-consonans (J). The On the sound and uses of i-consonans (j), see viii. i, and xii. 6. j pirant It corresponds to Sk. y, sometimes to Gr. f, as iugum (Sk. yuj, Gr. vy6v). a) A form of i taller than the adjoining letters (I), appears in late Republican and Augustan Inscrr. to express 1) long I-voc. : * DlVO, El, STIPENDlS. 2) i-cons. ; both between vowels and initially : MAlOR, CVlVS, ElVS ; IVS, IVLIA. A more corrupt form il is also found : cvilvs, coilvci. d) That which is merely a general fact, has been wrongly set down as a rule of sound : namely, that a vowel before i-cons. is long. Corssen has shewn that in all words which can be traced (for ieiunus is obscure) where a vowel is long before i-cons., it is so by its own nature : a-io, Ga-ius, Ma-ius, pe-ior, pe-iero, &c. 2) Greek ou (as in OueAe'a for Velia in Dion. Hal.) expresses Gr. digamma and Lat. v; and this sound cannot be interpreted as Eng. v, but as w. The occasional substitution of ft, by Plutarch chiefly, proves nothing to the contrary : but only means that, ov being a clumsy representation of f and v, /3 was taken as the nearest labial instead. 3) A. Gellius cites a grammarian, who says that Deus Vaticanus presided over infancy, and that the two first letters of his name (Va) are that sound which the infant first utters. The sound then is Eng. wa not va, which the infant, having no teeth, cannot utter. Corssen's opinion is that Latin initial v may have had that middle sound between w and v, which German w has in some localities ; the upper teeth being brought near to the lower lip, but not pressed upon it. This view we cannot accept. 1 It was shewn (p. 33) that ei was long used to express I with a leaning to e. Lucilius tried to mark long vowels by writing them twice, as Maarcus for Marcus. This appears on some Inscrr. but did not last long. It was followed in Cicero's time by the Apex or mark over a long vowel, like (') or ('), which frequently appears on a, e, o, u ; not on i. 2 68 Latin Soundlore. I2 Inbi-iugus, quadri-iugus, tri-iuges, &c., i, being naturally short, remains so. c) Progressive assimilation has changed i-cons. to 1 in cello, fallo, pello for (cel-yo, fal-yo, pel-yo), as a\Xoc in Greek for (a'A-yoc), (T(j)a\\(i) for (<7rt>a/\-ya>). d) On luppiter, luno, I anus, &c. for D-iupiter, &c., see p. 1 5. This passage from dj to j shews distinctly how the assibi- lation arose by which i-cons., afterv\ r ards taking the sign J, became a compound palatal sibilant in English and (with gi for Eng. j) in Italian ; while in French it becomes purely palatal. So, from Latin diurnus we get Eng. It. Fr. journey giorno journte X. The Double Consonant x. X ( = cs) corresponds to Gr. . See vii. 8. Republican as well as L. L. Inscrr. shew zs : deixserit) duxserit, vixsit. In L. L. z passed into ss or s, and appears as ss in Italian ; so disse for dixit. 1 A more ample list is here added of Latin words which have lost initial letters. i. C. : vapor, vapidus, vappa (Jruaf) ; vermis ; verrere ludere (krftf)', libum ; raudus (c-rudus, ' raw ') ; nidor (icvl