UC-NRLF ^ fj^ . r >:;:■'■• ■■ t^/:^'^l:^:rv*.: -",■-#■ '.¥i^. ^ [l (jC^ CULTURE IN EARLY SCOTLAND. CULTURE IN Early Scotland BY JAMES MACKINNOxN, M.A, Ph.D., Aui/wro/ "South African Traits,'- and " Nhuan und seln Einjluss LONDON : WILLIAMS & NORGATE. 1892. X)A777 t • l' • •• PRINTED AT THE DARIEN I'RESS, BRISTO I'LACE, EUINBURGH. TO WILHELM ONCKEN, DOCTOR OF THILOSOPHY, PROFESSOR OF HISTORY AT THE UNIVERSITY OF GIESSEN, AND ONE OF GERMANY'S MOST DISTINGUISHED CONTEMPORARY HISTORIANS, A SMALL TRIBUTE TO THE WORTH OF THE MAN, THE INSPIRING POWER OF THE PROFESSOR, AND THE WELL-EARNED REPUTATION OF THE EDITOR OF, AND CONTRIBUTOR TO, THE MONUMENTAL WORK, '■'■ Alhemeine Geschichte in Einzel-Darstelhingen." c ^32148 PREFACE. The subject treated in the following chapters embraces the Prehistoric, Roman, and Celtic Christian Culture of Scotland. Though North Britain was not known by the name of Scotland before the eleventh century, and the term Scotia must always be understood of Ireland previous to that time, I have retained it as most convenient, while not limiting myself exactly to the modern territorial boundary. As I explain further on, I use the word culture in a wide sense to denote anything of interest in the social, religious, and intellectual condition of a people. I have in a critical, yet, I trust, unbiassed spirit, gathered my material from every source fitted to throw light on what is in some portions of it an obscure subject. In treating such portions I have largely used the illustrative method, aiming to set before the reader a suggestive general picture of a state of things with which the want of sufficient information baffles a detailed acquaintance. Happily, however, the testimony of archaeology, of folk-lore, and of the older historians such as Bxda, Gildas, Adamnan, and others, who have noticed ancient Scotland, has enabled me to deal in a more direct fashion with other periods in the culture of our forefathers. Happily, too, there are not wanting outstanding figures within the pale of the historic epoch, treated in the second and third books, whose lives may be taken as an epitome of the culture of their age. While giving in the footnotes the authorities on whom I base some statement or conclu- sion, I have refrained from lingering in the text over intricate and dry processes of archaeological or historical Vlll PREFACE. reasoning, and have striven to render the story of our past readable as well as instructive. This merit cannot be claimed, with the rarest exceptions, for the treatises on the history or arch.neology of Scotland, which are irksome reading to all but the knowledge-thirsty student. Whilst I acknowledge my obligations to the scholars whose in- dustry and erudition have done much for the elucidation of our early civilisation, I claim the indulgence of the reader in making an independent attempt to portray the culture of early Scotland in the sense of the German " cultur." In regard both to the method of treatment adopted, and the conclusions come to, I would remark, in the words of a great modern English historian,* that " in fairness the author has a right to demand that his critic should have tried to put himself in his place, and look at the subject from his standpoint." * Stubbs, " Lectures on Mediaeval and Modern History," p. 60. CONTENTS. BOOK I.— PREHISTORIC CULTURE. PAGE CHAPTER I.— INTRODUCTORY. Culture and its survival — The dawn of written record — The archives of the soil and their interpretation — Principle of arrangement — Intervening stages — Intermingling of objects — The interest and importance of old things, . i CHAPTER II.— THE SAVAGE. Development, not degradation, the course of man — In- terrupted by relapse or decay — Records of primeval British savage in the gravel beds of Ice Age — Conditions of life — Beginning of history of art — Architecture of of Later Stone Age — Cairns and their contents — Their builders — Additional evidence — The living representative of the Stone Age savage — The qualities with which he is credited, ....... 9 CHAPTER III.— WORK AND PROGRESS. Development represented by Bronze — Ethnology of new race — Non-survival of human dwellings — Stone circles the silent monuments of forgotten history— Their fictitious interest — Family or district cemeteries — Their signi- ficance from standpoint of culture — Moral anomalies — Mode of life — Abundance of gold — Community rude, but influence of elevating forces, . . . .19 CHAPTER IV.— ARCHITECTURE AND WAR. Advent of the Celt — Celtic art — The light-bearing dawn of history — Architectural remains — Human dwellings — The brochs and their inhabitants— Lake dwellings and earth houses, and their occupants — Inferences from these structures in harmony with first historic glimpses — The significance of their defensive character in connection with tribal division — Effort to maintain the community and the home — Tales of Greek romancers — Barbarian, not savage culture — The reality of things, . . 32 X CONTENTS. CHAPTER v.— CELTIC PAGANISM. l'A(,E No written literature in prehistoric times — Existence of religious culture in earlier ages — Religious culture of pagan Celts — A priestridden people — Patriotism of Druids and their suppression by the Romans — The British hierarchy in Tacitus — The Celtic Pantheon — Superstitious remains of paganism — Burns's "Hallowe'en" — Moral power of Druidic cult— Moral condition of British Celts — Tacitus's estimate of northern tribes, . . . .48 BOOK II.— ROMAN CULTURE. CHAPTER I.— THE PLASTIC TOUCH OF ROME. Scotland as part of Roman empire — Relations of Britain to Rome — Heterogeneous character of settlers — Roman con- quest at first a beneficial revolution — Transformation effected in South and North — Hostile relations between Roman and Pict — Edinburgh a Roman settlement— Along the Wall of Antoninus — Traces of the refined products of Italy —The "Pompeii" of Britain — In- tellectual culture — Greek culture in the Roman world — Travelling libraries — Material and social condition of Roman Britain — The dark side of the picture — How colony regarded — Misgovernment and character — In- direct influence of Rome beyond Forth — Long con- tinued hostility, ...... 65 CHAPTER II.— THE BROKEN GODS AND CHRISTIANITY. Variety of religions — Toleration — Religious earnestness — Comprehensiveness of the polytheist — Cosmopolitanism — Religion the nurse of Art- Intolerant treatment of Christianity — Displaced paganism, perpetuated Empire- Its power — Stoicism as competitor — Paucity of Christian relics in Roman Britain — Extravagance of legend — The Fathers and British Church— No national Church, . 85 CHAPTER III.— NINIAN : HIS AGE AND HIS INFLUENCE. Bicda's reference to Ninian — Legendary lives — The spell wielded by Rome — Influence of Roman bishop in West — British Church affected by this ecclesiastical influence — The monastic movement — Missionary spirit — St Martin at .Marmouticr — Key to the chronology of Ninian's life — Gaulish artisans in Britain — Candida Casa- Th CONTENTS. xi character of his age—Extent of his labours— Political significance — His mission a practical inspiration — His teaching — Blended with superstition — Date of death, ••••... icx) CHAPTER IV.— TWO CENTURIES OF CLAIR-OBSCURE. Still in touch with Roman culture — Gildas — Traditional and historic importance — " Concerning the Destruction of Britain "^Saxon invasion, and the struggles of rival chiefs — Effects on culture — Candida Casa, the first Scottish university— Bardic poetry — Gcrmanus and the British Church— Gildas on the condition of the clergy — Relapse into paganism in the North— Indirect influence of St I'atrick— Arthur as culture hero— Kentigern— Biography by Joceline— Bishop of Strathclyde— Com- munity at Glasgow — Retirement to Wales — Estimate of reputation and influence — Pope Gregory on the decay of Rome, . . . . . . .121 BOOK III.— CELTIC CHRISTIAN CULTURE. CHAPTER I.— COLUMBA AND lONA. Celtic culture and the barbarism of Roman empire — Political state of Ireland — The monastery a national institution — Columba and Adamnan — Royal descent and boyhood — Activity in Ireland — His missionary pilgrimage to lona, an act of penance? — Monastery at lona— King Brude— Conversion and Druid opposition — Columba's life rich in significant incident— Plan of operations- Monastic churches— Contemporary missionaries from Ireland — Estimate of results— Cormac and the spirit of adventure — The community at lona — Intellectual culture of school — The personality of Columba, . . . 145 CHAPTER II.— THE CELTIC MISSIONARY IN NORTHUMBRIA. Columba's mission continued and consolidated — lona and the outside world — Teutonic conquest of Northumbria — Norseman or Saxon ? — Culture of invader — The spirit of freedom — Reverence for the supernatural — The Witen- agemot in favour of Christianity — Liberality and saga- city of Roman Church— Penda and Oswald— Aidan at Lindisfarne — King and bishop — Renewed disorder — Oswin and Aidan— Beeda's tribute— Penda as type of pagan Anglo-Saxon chief— Monastic establishments Xll CONTENTS. I-AGE between Forth and H umber — Anglo-Saxon youth and Irish seminaries — Intercourse between North and Con- tinent, and revival of Roman culture — Friction be- tween Roman and British Churches — Controversy in Northumbria — Importance for intellectual life of period — St Peter versus Columba — Baida's appreciation of the worth of Celtic monks — Toleration incompatible with spirit of age — Decision in favour of unity, instructive political lesson for Saxon and Celt — Brings North into close touch with broader, more refined culture — Trace in Adamnan of more pliable spirit at lona towards it — His literary distinction — King Nechtan— Rome at length conquers Grampians, . . . . .172 CHAPTER III.— THE MONK OF MELROSE. Life of Cuthbert — An epitome of Celtic Christian culture — His boyhood, and quickness of fancy — Student under Boisel at Melrose — His contemporay Wilfrid — Almoner at Ripon — Cuthbert as wandering preacher — At Lindis- farne — Anchorite on the islet of Fame — Morbid spiritualism — Practical effects— Cuthbert as bishop of diocese of Lindisfarne — National calamity — Death, and last words, . . . . , . .199 CHAPTER IV.— DEGENERATION AND DECAY. Meagre literary sources for history of Celtic period — Political condition of the country — Ravages of the Norsemen — Martyrdom of Blaithmac and Adrian — Seizure of ecclesiastical property and disorganisation of Church — Interruption of connection with Ireland — Caddroe — The Culdees — Roman ecclesiastical revival in the eleventh and twelfth centuries, . . . . .215 CHAPTER v.— THE CELTIC MONASTERY. Testimony of archaeology— Architectural remains — The Celtic monk on the Continent — Monastery as literary work- shop — Manuscripts and art — The monkish sculptor — Disciple of the scribe — Illustrative of the life of period — Object-lesson in religion — Sculptor as moralist — Ogham inscriptions, ..... 227 BOOK I, ? ''•>'',,' PREHISTORIC CULTURS.^..»,.o, . .', CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTORY. I USE the word culture in a general sense. It em- braces the mental condition of man and its modes of expression, — whatever, in short, is of interest and importance in the condition of a people. It refers to its intellectual and moral state, its sense of art or its manual skill, its customs and social institutions, &c., as far as these ma\- be inferred, or have been handed down by written record. The term is usually applied to denote intellectual acquisition or refinement, and viewed in this sense ma)^ appear entirely out of its element in conjunction with the words barbarian or savage. It may seem, at first sight, to be degrading gold with a coating of tin. But culture need not be the equivalent for high intellectual refinement or attainment, though it has come to have this special meaning in literary phraseology. The history of the race, as of the individual, is a history of development, and ever}- stage of civilisation indicates a grade of culture, however low it may be. There'is such a thing, then, as primitive culture, and the manner in which the primitive man thinks and acts is truly a phase of that growth by which the highly refined man has reached maturity. The culture of to-day rests indeed on that of primeval ages, and it is not difficult to find in the customs, the traditions that have survived from the remote past, the traces of its presence and its A 2 CULTURE IN EARLY SCOTLAND. influence. " Survival in culture," says Dr Tylor, " placing all along the course of advancing civilisation waymarks full of meaning to those who can decipher their signs, even now sets up in our midst primitive monuments of barbaric thought and life."* We ma)- feel a vast gulf between ourselves and our primeval ancestors, who lived in caves and hunted with the flint arrowhead, and in many respects wc cannot bc^&aid, to be related by any bond of s>-mpath\-. The nifluences' which shape our thoughts are largel)- different, for .i-nstance ; •still there is the race connection, there i-s the human spirit, in whose workings a real though rude soul reflects itself Genius there may not be in our sense of the term, but reason certainly, and we must be shortsighted and supercilious to a degree if we can perceive no trace of our likeness in the reflection. In the case of a highly civilised country, the indications of this lower culture must be looked for in the archives of the soil, in those prehistoric deposits of objects found in the graves of the dead, or left on purpose or by accident in the sand or the moss by the living. The dawn of written record broke comparatively late for many peoples, and beyond their first appearance in histor)- there lie long ages of silence, whose secrets are but meagrely and dimly disclosed by the researches of the archaeologist. This is markedly the case with Britain, l}-ing, as it does, in a remote north-western corner of Europe, far from the scene of the earlier civilisations. Though not unknown to the Greeks of the time of Pytheas, the Humboldt of antiquity, who visited it and the islands northward of it in the middle of the fourth century is.C, and connected by traffic with the Greek merchants of Massilia (Marseilles), the informa- tion derived from historic sources is extremely fragmentary before the Roman invasion. It is not indeed till the age of Domitian that the pregnant pen of Tacitus, in describing the campaigns of his father-in-law, Agricola, touches on the martial tribes of Caledonia, and, unfortunately, he has not immortalised their manners in the same systematic and graj^hic way that he has those of the Germans. From this time to the advent of the Christian missionary * " Primitive Culture,' p. 21. ARCHIVES OF THE SOIL. 3 we get occasional glimpses of the barbarian inhabitants of Northern J3ritain from foreign authors like Dion Cassius and Ammianus Marcellinus, which wc shall notice later on. Of this written information we shall make use as tending- to some extent to reflect the prehistoric culture with which we purpose to deal in this book, but for the ages which preceded Roman governor and Christian missionary we must have recourse chiefly, as I have said, to the archives of the soil. These afford us, however, a varied and elo- quent tale of the peoples that have successively colonised our northern land in prehistoric times, or are found con- temporaneously occupying it during its earliest historic period. The surface of the country may, in fact, be com- pared to a manuscript in which the record of the culture of many nations, who have marked their presence, if not with pen and ink, in the less coherent but still eloquent characters of their weapons and implements, their monu- ments and ornaments, is strangely interwritten. Finn and Goidel, Brython and Roman, Saxon and Norseman, and may be others long forgotten, have contributed their share to this record, which the soil of the country has preserved. We may not, in the shadowy light that falls on it, especially in considering the remains of the remoter cultures of the Stone and Bronze i\ges, hit on the right interpretation of this intricate record ; but the writing is there, and our archaeologists can at least claim that they have done their best to decipher it. And not without result. We may hesitate, for instance, before accepting the evidences of Phoenician influence, and an elaborate Druidic cult, which Colonel Leslie Forbes* finds in the mysteriously inscribed blocks of stone in Aberdeenshire, but to any man of trained observation, the objects which the primeval mourner placed in the graves of the departed so far explain themselves, and Sir Daniel Wilson, Dr Anderson, Dr Monro, and others have interpreted those and other prehistoric remains, in their monumental works on Scottish archaeology, with an enthusiasm tempered by a scientific spirit. Their inferences as to the social condition and moral character, for instance, of the men who used the implements and * "The Early Races of Scotland.' 4 CULTURE IN EARLY SCOTLAND. weapons and erected the cairns and stone circles of the Stone and Bronze periods, seem to me too flattering at times (of which more anon), and the vagueness that hangs like a dreamy haze over the remote past will not be disenchanted even by enthusiasm and science. But facts speak for themselves and tell us something definite, whether our general conclusions be right or wrong. An important question suggests itself at the outset. Can the mass of objects recovered from their lair under- neath the surface of the soil be arranged in intelligible order, so as to yield some sort of connected stor}- ? Is there a means of distinguishing objects representing a more remote culture from those which may represent a less remote one ? A gradual succession of date is of course impossible where no written record exists to guide us, but there is a principle of arrangement which, in some degree, supplies its place. It is as simple as it is obvious. The method is just to proceed, as a rule, from the ruder things to the less rude, from the simple to the less simple, from the stone or bone which came more easily to the hand of primitive man to the metal which required for its produc- tion a skill and observation gained by increased experience. The tribes of the human race, which occupy the lowest level of civilisation in our modern world, have been found to be those who worked or hunted with instruments fashioned of bone or stone. Wherever there is a knowledge of the metals, the degree of culture is correspondingly higher. This order of development is thus as historically certain as it is intuitively probable. But there still remains the question as to the order in the use of the metals. Here again the amount of skill and experience necessary for their production suggests the answer. The knowledge and use of copper and tin must precede the manufacture of bronze, which marks one of the epochs in the history of inventive genius, and which forms the natural stepping- stone to a discovery still more significant in the history of culture — the smelting of iron. It is not necessarily evident that the manufacture of iron in every case succeeded that of bronze. It is conceivable that the former process may have been discovered by some sagacious individual among INTERVENING STAGES. 5 a people to whom the fusion of copper with tin was unknown. The modern savage, we know, passed in many instances, by contact with the European merchant or colonist, from the use of stone or bone or wood to that of iron without any intervening stage. But it is certain that the possession of iron instruments denotes a hicfher condition of culture than the use of the less serviceable alloy of copper and tin, and we may safely regard the conventional divisions of prehistoric time into the Stone, Bronze, and Iron Ages as accurately expressing progressive stages in the culture of our insular ancestors. Of course, there may have been, probably were, inter- vening stages corresponding to the use of other materials besides these three. Articles of tin, copper, and lead are also found amid the remains of our prehistoric insular culture. Among the American Indians, tribes have been found using only instruments of copper, and axes of this material existed in Scotland, Italy, and Hungary. Hero- dotus informs us that the Massagetas, a people living near the Caspian Sea, had no iron or silver, but plenty of gold and copper. Their lances and axes were of copper, and their caps and belts were decorated with golden orna- ments.* It is more than likel)^ that in a country where copper was not unplentiful, and which is easily worked, there was a time when the awakening intelligence of the savage fashioned instruments of this material, or used it as he did the gold and tin, for making the ornaments with which he decorated himself But copper, tin, or lead do not singly possess the qualities which go to produce a serviceable instrument, and thus we do not find them in the abundance which lends such a typical distinction to the objects made of iron, bronze, or stone. These divisions may thus not be quite exhaustive, but they are not arbitrary, like many of the divisions which the historian makes when dealing with written record, and discussing the progress of events or the growth of institutions. In these we may sometimes perceive the reflection of opinion * Herodotus, i., c. 215 : "They make great use of gold and copper : . . . they use no silver or iron." 6 CULTURE IN EARLY SCOTLAND. rather than the indication of fact. But stone, bronze, and iron mark with unmistakable emphasis so many stages in human experience and progress. This principle of arrangement, according to these three prevailing types of material, may be objected to on the ground that, though we may separate them on the shelves of a museum into their respective periods, they are often found together in the same deposit, as if the man who owned an iron sword, also wore a bronze armring, and used a stone hammer or drinking cup. It is very probable that he did, nay, it is certain. We must guard against the mistake of supposing that the objects embraced by these divisions stand out distinct and unconnected. The use of bronze did not result in the discontinuance of the use of stone, nor that of iron in the disappearance of its two predecessors. The advance of the human race is by gradual development rather than by distinct leaps, and while there is progress by new departures, there is the survival of the old along with it. Our modern culture, as I have already remarked, comes not merely from, say, the resplendent antiquity of Athens or Rome, but from the days as well when what is now the rush-covered mass of stones and mud in some bog or " mere " was a lake dwelling, and from a past reaching even further back. But there is a means of deciding whether weapons or implements of stone, bronze, or iron recovered from the soil really belong to the age when this material furnished the means of making war or obtaining sustenance. When we find only fragments of stone tools in a grave, we may safely take this as an indication that the mourners who placed them there were unacquainted with anything else. Or should we light upon some cemetery of the Bronze Age, and dig up a collection of bronze weapons and ornaments, with perhaps an urn bearing a peculiar stj'le of ornamentation, we may quite as safely conclude that they mark the last resting-place of one who fought with weapons of bronze, but who had never wielded a sword or an axe of iron. So too, — apart from the objects themselves, — the t\-pe of structure in w hich thc\- are found, or of the art by which they are decorated, enables the archa-^ologist to OLD THINGS. 7 denote what stage in the culture of our forefathers these things represent. These old things, which thus arrange themselves in the cases or on the shelves of an antiquarian museum, like that of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland at Edinburgh, are replete with living interest, when we try to realise their importance. For one thing, they come to us as messengers from the dead, because, as I have already observed, the workers of these remote periods, living as it were at the back of time, wrote the outlines of their existence with the weapons or implements they fashioned. Be it remembered, too, in considering this message in bronze or stone or iron, that the effort of skill necessary to conceive and produce a gracefully fashioned and chastely decorated urn, for example, is no contemptible evidence of that intelligence in the individual which is the secret spring of progress in the community. And these things appeal not merely to the speculative reason, but to the imagination as well. They reflect upon the dim canvas of the remote past a picture which is not without its fascination, all the more that it is so unlike the world in which we live. We feel as if looking into the unseen, not the to be, but that which has been and vanished. The finding of some article, it may be thousands of years old, three or four feet beneath the present surface of the soil, is an unveiling of the past akin to that which we strive, during moments of longing or reflection, to wring from the vague future, and lends an interest to some waste and barren spot more real than poet inspired could give it. Truly the archaeologist has his hours of romance, and if we catch him sometimes dreaming rather than soberly reasoning, we must not forget that dreams now and then foreshadow or reflect a truth. At all events, his inductions add to the poetry of the past. Sir Daniel Wilson,* for instance, finds in the now desolate hillsides of parts of Argyleshire indications of a degree of cultivation having existed at some former period far beyond what is exhibited in that locality at the present day. And such evidences of ancient population and industry are, he informs us, by no means confined to the remote districts of Prehistoric Annals of Scotland," p. 231. » a 8 CULTURE IN EARLY SCOTLAND. ancient Dalriada. They occur in man\- parts of Scotland, startling the believer in the unmitigated barbarism of the countr}-, prior to the mediaeval era, with the evidence of a state of prosperity and civilisation at some remote epoch, the date of which has yet to be ascertained. Another significant glimpse of this kind, to mention but one more example, was afforded by the discovery of two pairs of celt moulds in the parish of Rosskeen, Ross-shire. " The site of this interesting discovery," .says the same author,* " is about four miles inland, on the north side of the Cromarty Firth, on a moor which the proprietor is reclaiming from the wild waste and restoring once more to the profitable service of man. In the progress of this good work abundant evidence demonstrated the fact that the same area, from which the accumulated vegetable moss of many centuries is now being removed, had formed the scene of a bus)', intelligent, and industrious population." * Pp. 223, 224. PROGRESSION, NOT DEGRADATION. CHAPTER II. THE SAVAGE. WE may, without being guilty of calumniating the dead, pronounce our ancestors of the Stone Age savages. However eloquently the archaeologist may draw pictures of their skill or their taste, the fact will not be blinked. The evidence, such as it is, reveals, for the most part, a state of wretchedness and rudeness compatible only with the culture of a people at a low stage of develop- ment. The tradition of the degradation of the human race from a high condition of primeval civilisation to that of savages, has given place, in the view of thinking men, to the inference that the progress of the race has rather been from a lower to a higher culture. Archaeological and anthropological investigation into the dim past of the race discloses no paradise, no golden age in which an elastic fancy has fondly placed the early ancestors of a people. Intellectual and material progress, not degradation from some long lost culture, is the verdict of history. "The notion of the intellectual state of savages," it has been well said,* "as resulting from decay of previous high knowledge, seems to have as little evidence in its favour as that stone celts are the degenerate successors of Sheffield axes, or earthen grave mounds degraded copies of Egyptian pyramids." There have undoubtedly been cases of relapse. W'hat we may find in the individual or the community we find also in the race at large. Misfortune may reduce many a tribe in the scale of civilisation, and in this sense there has been degradation. The Bushman, who was pressed into the barren wilds along the south-western coast of the Cape by invading tribes from the north-east, was compelled to become the victim of a wilder and less prosperous existence than when he dwelt in the more fertile regions, of which he was dispossessed. There are instances, too, in which a * Tylor, "Primitive Culture," p. 6S. 10 CULTURE IN EARLY SCOTLAND. more civilised race has left the monuments of its culture as the witness to its memory when a less civilised one has taken its place, as in the case of the mound builders of the Mississippi.* Civilisations too have flourished and passed away, and the degenerate posterity of a people has more than once survived, in puny impotence, the grandeur and strength of their forefathers. But it does not follow from this that the people, which is found in a rude state of culture, has as a rule fallen back from a comparatively high state. Where there is no evidence of the existence of a high culture, we are not entitled to reason from the emblems of savagery that have come down to us, say from the remote Stone Age, that any higher culture preceded that which they indicate. Britain may have been the scene of a culture as high as that of ancient Egypt or Babylon, but there is nothing to indicate this in its prehistoric annals ; they reveal, on the other hand, the progression, which is observable in the history of the human race in general — from savagery to barbarism and from barbarism to civilisa- tion. If Roman civilisation was swept away by the rude Pict and the fierce Saxon, the disturbance was but tempor- ary, and new growth succeeded the decay and destruction of the old. It is in the drifts and gravel beds of the Age of Ice that we must seek the records of the primeval British savage. What archaeologists like Prestwick,t Evans, and others, discovered in the gravel beds of the Somme — hand-shaped flints embedded along with the remains of animals — was subsequently found in other valley deposits in Europe. The course of the Thames, for example, has )-ielded a considerable number of these flint implements, and the period of their use may be vaguely estimated by the differ- ence in the level of the river then and now, ranging from between 80 and 1 20 feet. The animal remains in these gravel deposits include the bones of the mammoth, elephant, rhinoceros, hippopotamus, horse, bear, elk, stag, and wild ox, so that the first trace of the human species is found in association with existing animal nature — that is, when * Cf. Mitchell, " I'ast in ilio rreseiU," lect. i. + Arclueolugical Jounm!, vol. xlviii. PALAEOLITHIC AGK. II the animals of an earlier period had disappeared, or nearly so. The period to which such relics belong has been variously named the Palaeolithic, the Early Stone, or Drift Aee, and their absence in North Britain has been assumed to indicate* that this region was still icebound and uninhabitable. To my mind, however, this is a subject on which there is still room to make allowance for the chances of future discovery, and the presence in the north of objects, such as rude stone implements and canoes deeply embedded in the soil, of the same character as those found on the sites of human habitation in the south, suggests a date remote enough to be contemporary with the man of the Drift or Early Stone Age. Shell mounds have in fact been dis- covered on the shores of the Moray Firth. Those of Denmark, where they are very numerous and are known as Kjokkenmoddings (kitchen middens), — the refuse heaps of a people who lived on shell-fish, — are assigned to the Early Stone Ao-e. Those of the north of Scotland are, however, believed by Lubbock t to belong to a later time. The conditions of life in a climate arctic in its severity could only have admitted a hard and cheerless existence. The dwelling of the savage would be the cave ■; or rock shelter, his diet the wild animals and shell-fish. The few tools and weapons, with which he sought to aid himself in the struggle for existence, would consist of flint knives, stone hammers, adzes, and implements for working in leather. The imagination of a Milton might have revelled in describ- ing the rigours of such an existence, and one involuntarily thinks of that grim passage § in which the miseries of the region beyond the river Lethe are pictured. " Beyond this flood a foreign continent Lies dark and wild, beat with perpetual storms Of whirlwind and dire hail, which on firm land Thaws not, but gathers heap and ruin seems Of ancient pile, all else deep snow and ice." * Archaologii-al Journal, vol. xlviii. t " Prehistoric Times," p. 233. t Hence called also the Cave Period. The remains of implements and animal and human bones show that this was one mode of human dwelling in the remote Stone Age. A notable example in Britain occurs at Brixham. near Torquay. § "Paradise Lost," ii., p. 107 (Masson's edition). 12 CULTURE IN EARLY SCOTLAND. Yet it is a remarkable fact that it is with these savage tribes of the Early Stone Age that the history of art com- mences. Ornaments in the .shape of beads and amulets have been found in the gravel deposits, as we should expect among even the rudest tribes. "The passion for self- ornamentation," says Lubbock,* " seems to prevail among the lowest, as much as, if not more than, among the more civilised races of mankind." But we should not have looked for the representations of animals with so much spirit, so much likeness to their objects in them, as in the group of reindeer scratched with the point of a flint on a piece of bone found in the cave of La Madeleine in the Dordogne. The fact that they have called forth the admiration of men of culture in our day, says a great deal for the artistic instinct of the cave-dweller, who maintained the struggle for life at a time when the reindeer and perhaps the mammoth roamed in the south of France, and a whale or a canoe might have stranded several miles inland from the present shore of the Solway or the Forth. I remember being struck during my travels in Southern Africa with the animal figures which the degraded Bushman had traced with red clay on the face of some rock. Still such a fact in itself would not lead us to infer a high culture, though it implies a certain creditable capacity. The Age of Bronze, for instance, was certainly an advance on that of Stone, but the imitative faculty seems to have lain dormant. As we must turn to the Early Stone Age for the first specimens of art known to man, so we must seek in the Neolithic or Later Stone Period for the time-worn monu- ments of his primitive architecture, at least within our island. It .seems meet that it should be from the graves of a loner-forgotten era that this knowledge should come to us. No structure remains which can be assigned as the abodes of the living in the Stone or Bronze Ages in Scotland, except perhaps that extremely ancient form of dwelling — the crannog or lake dwelling. Our remote forefathers seem to have been more concerned to perpetuate the memory of the departed than to i)reserve the haunts of the living. Their dwellings must have been of a slight and peri.shablc * "Origin of Civilisation," p. 71. MAUSOLEUMS OF STONE ACE. 1 3 character ; but the mounds or cairns in which they placed their dead have withstood the changes of many centuries, and \-ielded instructive results to the zeal and acuteness of archaioloeists like the late Mr Rhind and Dr Anderson. These huge masses of stone, covered over now by a layer of turf and earth, extending over the whole area of Britain, but in Scotland most numerous in Caithness, Orkney, and Argyle, have been found to be built upon a plan, which only the transformation of age has concealed from the passer-by. Though but the charnel houses of a rude and hoary antiquity, they represent the rudiments of the architectural art which these forefathers of ours had learned, and the interest attach- ing to them as such is increased by the presence of an internal chamber in which objects used by the living as well as the remains of the dead have been deposited. Some of those explored in Caithness are horned, that is, they have two hornlike projections at either end, but they all bear indica- tions of having been constructed by the same race, or within the same period, by the ever-recurring feature of the vaulted chamber, usually divided into three compartments,* with a passage giving access from the outside, and by the character of the articles found in them. These included human and animal bones (the former sometimes preserved in a round-bottomed, rudely ornamented urn), both burnt and unburnt. In one the presence of thirty skulls was inferred from the fragments picked up. The flooring was, indeed, found in most cases to be composed of clay mixed with bone ashes, and the intermingling of the remains of animals such as the ox, the deer, the sheep, the pig, the horse, the dog, prove that the funeral rites of the people of the Later Stone Age included a rude banquet, supposing that they were not placed there as food for the dead, who were apparently equipped for their journey into the unseen with the stone axe and flint-pointed arrows, also found among the remains.-f- These rude mausoleums have figured a good * Those in Orkney show a slightly difterent plan of chamber. It consists of one apartment with a number of cells opening oft' it. t The Stone Age in Scandinavia reveals much the same characteristics as in Scotland. It.s relics in both countries, such as domestic animals, potter)-, instruments, appear to resemble each other. See a good account of Scandi- navia in Du Chaillu, "Viking Age," i., chap. viii. 14 CULTURE IN EARLY SCOTLAND. deal in popular tradition and mediaival tale as the haunt of the fierce dragon, which it was the boast of the Norseman, who has left the traces of his daring in the runes scratched on the walls of that of Maeshowe in Orkne>-, to have overcome when searching for the treasures it was fabled to guard. But to us their interest consists in the idea which they enable us to form of their builders. They were unacquainted with the use of bronze or iron. They emplo)-ed no tool to shape the material which the)- used in building, nor mortar to cement it together. But they were skilful enough to erect a rough beehive-roofed chamber as a resting-place for their dead, and to mark them by huge masses of stone, built on a well-defined plan, which have survived throughout long ages the less durable abodes of the living. Tis after all a creditable performance to produce something, whatever it be, — however rude and unshapely, — that will endure for several thousands of years. Is there not somewhat of the infinite longing of the soul in this unsightly mass of stones ? A type, too, of the " something attempted, something done," which is one of the most fruitful sentiments of the human heart, — an expression of the ambition to realise one's strength in the contemplation of the work of one's hands. Very impressive, too, is it not, as the mute witness of the thoughts of men engulfed in eternal silence? All the world is one country, as the Italian proverb has it, and a con- ception like this, however rude its expression, reminds us that so has it been from of )'ore, for the same soul moves in primeval savage and modern philosopher, though it reveals itself after a different fashion. The size of some of these cairns, necessitating combined effort for their erection, has been interpreted to signify that their builders lived in communities. The same argument has been drawn from the lake dwellings in luigland and Wales, inferred to belong to this period.* Like the villagers on the Roumelian lake, who taxed their share in the work of construction b)- the number of wives each man could afford to keep, necessit)- must have revealed to them the benefits of a division of labour. That, at all events, the>- * Some of the Swiss I'fahltiauten belong to the Stone Age. See the interesting chapter on this sui)ject in Lul)bock's '• Prehistoric Ages.'" PHILOSOPHY OF THE SAVAGE. 1 5 had reached the pastoral stage, the association of the domestic animals with the departed in the great chambered cairns clearly shows. The principle that unit}- is defence and the guarantee of a certain amount of comfort which isolation cannot secure, would soon teach the savage wherein his interest la}-. The savage is to a great extent a child in understanding, and invariabl}' shows the child's aversion to abstruse questions as to creed with which the missionary may puzzle him, but he has more practical shrewdness than he often gets credit for, and may be trusted to make the best of circumstances. He has a philosophy of life, such as it is, — principles which may not be dogmas, but are at all events unconscious moulders of life and destiny. He has only reached, it is true, the myth-making age, and possesses the crude poetic imagination, often indeed of remarkably vivid power, that finds mature expression in the fancy of the modern poet. Nevertheless the experiences of life beget in every mortal thoughts which weave them- selves into a practical philosophy, ideas which mould his age and his destiny, as in the case of higher civilisations. No age, even that of the savage, is so poor that it is not characterised by some leading thought — the offspring of the thinking brain — which lends it colour and movement, which is the mainspring of its history. From the specimens of stone implements which have been picked up where they were deposited or accidentall}^ dropped thousands of years back, we learn that though the builder of the Later Stone Age used no tools, he was hot destitute of tools of a sort. The axes, manufactured from granite or porphyr}- or other durable stone, were used b}- him as weapons and as implements for hewing, and some examples show that he knew how to grind and polish them skilfully. Several grinding stones which have survived would have attested this fact had no actual instance of their use been forthcoming. The larger number of the axes is unperforated, so that they must have been fitted into the hole bored in the wooden handle, as in the case of one recovered from a depth of six feet below the surface of the Solway Moss. The intelligence of their makers is apparent in the acuteness with which they adapted the form to the l6 CULTURE IN EARLY SCOTLAND. properties of the material used. Evidently the necessity of adapting means to ends — one of the great secrets of human progress throughout the ages — did not come to him without its lesson. Moreover, the fluted ornament of the beautiful flint arrow and spear heads — such welcome finds in our schooldays — is the expression of an art which it seems is now unknown to the savage who still works in stone, and remains a mystery to the man of science.* '" In the matter of arrowheads," says Burton,^- " Scotland can claim pre-eminence above any other land. They are exquisite marvels of handiwork." It appears, too, that the hoards of flint chips, which enabled us to supply some ploughman with material for striking a light for his pipe in the da)'s when matches were scarce in the north, mark the scene of some primeval workshop, where the flintworker not only plied his craft, but stored his supply of the precious material, never ver}' abundant in Scotland. Our savage ancestors had certainly no thought of our highly problematic existence, but the skilful hand was destined to perpetuate his memory even unto this era of future time,:|. for the delicate forms he produced to kill the deer with may be seen to-day adorning the breast of some fair dame as a pendant to a necklace. Even if many links in the chain that binds the present to the past be lost, notwithstanding the facility with which the Scot has been credited for constructing a pedigree, we ha\e doubtless his living representative among us still, were we only acute enough to discover him. This, some have attempted. An examination of the bones found in these sepulchral mounds in England, as well as in the flint mines of Norfolk and Sussex, has led to the conclusion that the people of the Stone Age were of short stature and small boned, with skulls of a long and narrow type. The women arc markedly smaller than the men, and the conditions of life are judged to have been the reverse of easy or favour- able to physical development. Thc\- probably resembled * Anderson, " .Scotl.ind in P.igan Times," p. 3S0. t " History of .Scollaml," i., p. 12S. t The .association of the present with the remote Stone Age is strikingly illustrated by the custom, still practised in Shcilanti, of heating milk or water by placing .a hot stone in a vessel tilled with one nf these liquids. See Mitchell, " Past in the Present," lect. v. MODERN DESCENDANTS 1 7 in habits and appearance the modern Lap, the Samoeid, and the Esquimaux.* But they could not have been destitute of daring and courage, if the Si lures, who gave the Romans so much trouble in their attempt to subdue Wales, were their representatives at a time when the torch of history begins to illuminate the haunts to which they had been dri\-en bv new invaders to seek refuire. Their modern survivors have been looked for, not merely in the Principality, but in certain parts of England, and among the short, blackhaired people of Ireland,t and the High- lands and islands of Scotland, whose " strange, foreis-n look " has struck the eye of the traveller. Considering the slender grounds we have for forming a judgment, such an attempt seems to me rather audacious. In the absence of historic evidence, part of the chain must perforce be cast in the moulds of fancy or conjecture. But it would be unreasonable to conclude that the primeval Briton com- pletely disappeared. Tribes and people have died out, no doubt, and this, alas, has been too much the tendency where a more civilised or a stronger race has come into contact with one at a lower stage of culture or vieour The track of the conqueror was, till comparatively recently, marked b}- the grim excesses of carnage and desolation. Britain itself has more than once suffered from this baneful fate of the race. The fierce Saxon and Dane, as well as the more highly civilised Roman, established their power at the point of the sword, planting their standards in the blood-d}-ed soil of a vanquished people. Conquest and carnage — this awful double-faced spectre even )'et rears its head above the most civilised regions of the earth, and the grim apparition has often stalked throughout our island home, bringing death and desolation in its train, — how often cannot be told, since the pall of oblivion wraps so large a portion of the past in its folds. Yet that the remnants, at least, of the tribes that have been, contributed to form this hetero- geneous Britain to-day, is as evident as it is probable, though the attempt to unravel the genealogical skein of the modern * Latham, "Ethnology of the British Isles," p. 25; Elton, "Origins of English History,"' p. 130. t Supposed to represent the Fir Bolgs of Irish tradition. B l8 CULTURE IN EARLY SCOTLAND. Briton still leaves a good deal of haze, even if clothed in the crisp diction of a Matthew Arnold.* Tacitus, for example, has left on record the opinion of observers living at the com- parative!}' early date of the first century, that the inhabitants of Britain were composed of tribes different in race and appearance.! But what Lubbock I says of the inhabitants of the succeeding Bronze Age is still more applicable to those of their predecessors of the Stone Period — " Until we have a considerable body of evidence, it would be very unsafe to speculate on their character." Whoever these primeval tribes were, they have been credited by those who have minutel)- examined the remains of their culture, with qualities, of which their modern descendants need not be ashamed. No people at a low stage of development have deser\-ed better the title of " the noble savage," if the inferences of our archaeologists are to be trusted. This seems to me questionable as far as their general condition is concerned, but for the present let the long-unremembered dead have the benefit of the doubt. " Reviewing the whole phenomena of the Stone Age," sa\'s Dr Anderson, " as these are manifested in Scotland, we find them affording evidence of capacity and culture in the individual associated with evidences of civilisation in the community." s!^ This is learned. Is it also fact ? The ages are wrapped in silence, and the eloquence of tools and ornaments is, after all, not quite so explicit as that of some of its modern interpreters. It is but justice to mention that the products of the Stone Age in other lands have likewise stirred the admiration of those competent to pass judgment on the skill and taste of the savage. Mr Du Chaillu,|| an authorit\- of high rank on Scandinavian antiquities, is as appreciative as Dr Anderson, and he claims an even higher degree of civilisation for the Stone and Bronze Age inhabitants of Scandinavia than existed among those of Central and Western Europe during the same periods. * "On the .Study of Celtic Literature," sect. ill. t " Agricola," c. 1 1. t" Prehistoric Times," p. 145. § Sir Arthur Mitchell ("Past in the Present," lects. i. and iv.) likewise adduces reasons for crediting the Stone Age man with intellectual capacity and correct sentiments. II Du Chaillu, "Viking Age," i., chaps, viii. and ix. AN EPOCH-MAKING EVENT. 19 CHAPTER III. WORK AND PROGRESS. THE discovery of bronze in a grave, which contains the traces of great antiquity, may be regarded as an epoch-making event in the history of a country. It furnishes convincing evidence of work and progress. While development is apparent in the more skilfully con- structed instruments of the Later Stone Age as compared with the Earlier, it becomes a predominant feature as soon as we find the presence of a metal like bronze. It represents a revolution in society which, though lost to histor)', must have been fraught with important results. It means for one thing a certain advance in material comfort. The workman furnished with a bronze axe was far more the master of circumstances than he who only possessed one of stone. It means also a corresponding development in the habits of life. The use of his implements and weapons would keep the man, who was acquainted with the manufac- ture of bronze, from remaining a savage. They would lend him a means of helping himself, which must speedily trans- form his whole life, giving him a better chance of clearing the forest, of tilling the ground, of providing shelter for himself and his dependants, of defending his home from the attacks of wild beasts, and of securing a richer diet than was possible before. It means, further, an impulse to trade and intercourse, an advance from the mere nomadic state to at least the rudiments of an industrial life — the exchange of manufactured articles and the spirit of enterprise which this includes. It means, too, the growth of intelligence. The education of the human race in its lower stages must depend largely on such tangible objects as men use in the ordinary work of life. These furnish an object-lesson, where thinking, without the aid of things that compel thought, is at a discount. They are to such, what a library is to the educated man of to-day. It is around them that 20 CULTURE IN EARLY SCOTLAND. his thoughts cluster more than anything else — the uses, the processes they represent, are familiar exercises on which his mind works. This embraces a large proportion of his culture. Any one intimately acquainted with the ways of country people, for instance, must have observed how much of their talk and their meditation is of their occupation, and everything related to it. His spear and his mattock — how much do these represent, too, of barbarian man. And the higher the type of implement, the more intricate and beneficial the uses to which it is put, the more developed the intelligence of the workman.* The peasant who has taken advantage of the mechanical progress of the last half- century, and uses the most approved implements in cultiva- tion, is clearly a more intelligent man, and represents a higher intellectual life, than he who has lagged behind the age. Intelligence must grow with knowledge, and if the first stages of growth were slow compared with the rapid pace at which man now advances in insight and enlightenment, they were all the same steps in advance, the one of the other. The ancients expressed their sense of the progress represented by the discovery of the metals by associating it with some marvellous event. Lucretius considered that the secret treasures of the earth were revealed to man by a terrible conflagration of a forest growing in metalliferous soil. Posidonius would have us believe that the gold and silver which added so much to the v/ealth of Spain, were revealed in the same way. So marked, at any rate, is the progress, social, intellectual, material, represented by the step from stone to bronze, that it has been regarded as indicating the advent of a new people. So Worsaae; and Lubbock,-f- judging from the marked difference between the art of the two periods, comes to the same conclusion. Wilson,;^ on the other hand, is of opinion that the likeness of the first * Sir Arthur Mitchell (" The Past in the Present," lect. iv.) holds that working in metals does not of itself necessarily imply a s^reater mental power, or greater culture, than working in stone, but the example illustrative of this is that of the degraded portion of a highly civilised community, an exception which does not invalidate the general rule. t "Origin of Civilisation."' chap. ii. :J: " Prehistoric Annals of Scotland,"' pp. 250-252. THE ADVENT OF A NEW RACK. 21 bronze weapons to those of stone indicates the transition b}' the same race from the latter to the former. The hypo- thesis of the advent of a new race means invasion ; that of a gradual transition of the same race, contact rather by means of barter. There is historical evidence, of a very remote date, of both these means of connection between Britain* and the Continent, and both undoubtedly share the merit of having given an impulse to our insular culture. At all events, the probability is that a discovery of this kind came from an external source rather than by dint of insular g-enius. The centre of civilisation in the ancient world was on the eastern shores of the Mediterranean, and the power which has given an impetus to the development of the human race has always radiated from some more or less limited centre. Since the intellectual revival of the fifteenth century, this influence has been derived from the north and west of Europe ; previously the path of progress was from the south and east. " It appears probable," says Lubbock, " that the knowledge of metal is one of those great discoveries that Europe owes to the East." t The discovery of stone and bronze moulds, in which the imple- ments of the Bronze Age were made, indicates that, whether introduced from without or not, their manufacture was afterwards carried on in the island. The new race which the use of bronze is thought to have added to the population of Britain, and which drove such of the older inhabitants as did not amalgamate into the less accessible regions, is inferred to have been of Finnish extraction — a tall, fair-haired, strong-limbed people, with short, round skulls, and rapidly retreating foreheads, non-Aryan, like their predecessors of the Stone Period, but better fitted by the possession of superior implements for maintaining the struggle for existence, and bringing with them a higher culture. Professor Rhysj believes that he has found the fragments of such a non-Aryan and non- Celtic language in such words as Leucopibia, the ancient name of the site of Whithorn, in Galloway, and in the tribe * Lubbock finds in certain kinds of stone, which are not native to Europe, traces of a trade with the East in the Neolithic Age. t " Prehistoric Times,"' p. 64. + " Celtic Britain." 22 CULTURE IN EARLY SCOTLAND. of the Epidia whom Ptolemy places in the north-west of Scotland. Others have recognised their posterity in the "huee-limbed and red-haired men of the north" of Vitruvius, and the fierce-eyed giants with whom Tacitus peopled Cale- donia. Speculation of this kind is not history, but the inquisitive reader will find in the " Origins of English History,"* a collection of curious facts, which are held to lend it weight. In whatever way the use of bronze became common in Britain, the era of its duration is so remote that no human dwelling has survived throughout the intervening centuries, if we except, perhaps, the form of habitation known as the lake dwelling. Examples of their architecture have been preserved nevertheless, but, as in the case of the Stone Age builders, they are the memorials of the dead. The culture we are considering is so old that we must still haunt the tombs of the dead for knowledge of the living. Some of these are marked b\- no external erection, and such spots in which the nameless dead have reposed these ages long have been discovered by accident and recognised as ceme- teries f of the Bronze Age, by the finding of human re- mains, along with one or more urns, and weapons or ornaments of bronze. Others are commemorated by cairns, like the one at Collessie — huge, shapeless masses of stones, | showing neither chamber, nor external plan, whose investi- gation has disclosed a stone cist resting on the surface of the ground, and, in one or two cases, underground inter- ments. But the striking feature of the cemetery of the Bronze Age are the impressive circles § of standing stones, so numerous even yet, especially in the north, though the unconscious sacrilege of the agriculturist has diminished their numbers. The two most imposing specimens are at * Elton. t Such as those at Magdalen Bridge, Midlothian ; Lawpark. St Andrews ; Shanwell, Kinross, &c. Z The degradation of type often thus forms a curious accompaniment of advancing civilisation. New forms reiilaco the old. which lingers only as a ruder and meaner survival. See Mitchell, " Past in the Present,'" lect. iii. § Other groups of stones, though not circular, but placed in parallel lines, as at Garhouse and Clyth, in Caithness, to which district they are limited so far as known, are also considered, with reasonable probability, to mark sepulchres of the Bronze Period. AN UNWRITTEN ILIAD. 23 Stennis, in Orkney, and Callcrnish, in Lewis, and it may- afford some idea of their dimensions, as well as the labour required to set up those massive undressed blocks of which they are composed, if we bear in mind that the former with its encircling trench, measures 366 feet in diameter, and probably numbered as many as sixty erect stones. The largest of those left standing measures fourteen feet in height, and eighteen feet in breadth. Their imposing dimensions might lead us at first sight to the conclusion that these circles were erected as public memorials of the deeds of some great hero, or of some great event, which rendered the scene sacred and memorable in the unsuns; annals of the past. In our ignorance of, and consequent indifference towards that faded past, we are apt to think that it contained nothing worthy of the inspiration of the bard. We forget that without a Homer the stirring deeds enacted before the walls of Troy would have been lost in the shadows of oblivion, and the heroic figures of a Hector and an Achilles, the wisdom of a Nestor, the noble sentiments of an Agamemnon, would never have thrilled the world to latest ages. Do I overstate the truth when I say that an Iliad might have been composed from the wars and adventures, the tales and rousing deeds of that lost age of which these impressive circles are the silent monuments ? After all, we possess but a fraction of the history of the human race. A moderate-sized library might contain, the multiplication of books notwithstanding, all that lies on this side of the borderland of myth and tradition, which divides us from the vast unknown and unrecorded incidents in the story of man. What sentiments of admiration, perhaps of reverence, if also of horror, might not move us, if we only understood what has been handed down in writing of stone like this, if we could only realise all that clusters around it. The discovery of more interments than one seems to indicate, however, that such circles were usually meant to commemorate the repose not of a single hero, but are rather the burying-place of a family or a tribe. But even if nothing more, they may be regarded as wit- nesses to history, for who has held converse with a fellow- mortal without stumbling on something worthy of note, 24 CULTURE IN EARLY SCOTLAND. something worthy a place in the biograph}' of humanit)'? One thing is certain — the\- have an historical significance, the\- at least represent the thoughts and deeds of those who in this wa}' stro\-c to give them permanent expression. Victor Hugo speaks the truth, " L'architecture a ete jusqu'au quinzieme siecle le registre principal de I'humanite . . . toute idee populaire comme toute loi religieuse a eu ses monuments ; le genre humain enfin n'a rien pense d'important qu'il ne I'ait ecrit en pierre. . . . L'architecture est le grand livre de I'humanite, I'expression principale de I'homme a ses divers etats de developpement, soit comme force, soit comme intelligence." * For long these venerable monuments of a lost age possessed what has been shown to be quite a fictitious interest. The}- were enveloped in a sinister mystery as the remains of Druidic temples. I remember as a boy being impressed with a feeling of awe, as I occasionally passed one of them in a field near m}' native place, and thought of the grim rites of human sacrifice that tradition associated with it, and recalled in fancy the blood and smoke stained priests who maintained their savage superstitions at such inhuman cost to a priest-ridden people. But this belief has been discredited b}' the researches of antiquaries like Mr Ch. Elphinstone Dalr}-mple, who did so much b>' personal investigation to discover the true significance of these venerable monuments, and thus consigned it to the limbo of so many exploded fancies which pass for truth in popular story and in the dust}' tomes of b}'egone writers. Less than a quarter of a century ago it found a strenuous advocate in so accomplished an author as Colonel Leslie Forbes.-f- But more of this anon, when we are brought face to face with the cult of North Britain in the authentic records of early missionary enterprise. The presence of human remains in the site of most of those examined justify us in regarding them as famil}- or district cemeteries — the last resting-places of our ancestors of the Bronze Age, around which the thoughts of the living centred in pious and mournful meditation in some such fashion as the * "Notre Dame de Paris,' i., pp. 256, 265. t " The Early Races of .Scotland." STONE MONUMENTS, ETC., IX FOLK-LORE. 25 passer-by beholds the Christian church)-ai'd of his native village. This does not, of course, exclude the possibility of their having been the scene of religious rites. Ca,\sar and Tacitus are weighty authorities for the existence in Britain of the bloody ceremonial of a barbarous cult, while Gildas * speaks of ancient temples whose images were mouldering awa)- in his daw The}' may afterwards have come, in association with such rites, to have a different use from their original one. The pagan of a later time, as we learn from the life of St Boniface, made use of them as altars whereon to sacrifice the living, or regarded them as the favourite haunts of malicious or benevolent spirits. The power of something old or mysterious to attract the re- verence of those by whom its primitive use is unknown or overlooked, is a fact which appears in history still. Even a comparatively trivial object may be thus honoured, if its antiquity lends it the charm of mystery. Many of the flint and stone weapons thus came to be regarded as emblems of the spirit-world, and many a fairy tale might be told of the Elfinarrow, the Elfbolt, the Thunderbolt of the North of Scotland and of Scandinavia, the Hlinebedden or Giants' beds of Germany, the Pixy rocks and Odin's Stone of English lore, and the Dolmens des Pierres Turquoises of Brittan}-. Much more so in the case of monuments, whose imposing dimensions and weatherbeaten isolation excite in the passer-by even yet an involuntary tribute of reverence. One of these stones had been appropriated as a gatepost by a farmer of a neighbouring parish to that in which m}- home was situated, but it had to be replaced, on the ground that it would not remain stationary, but moved from side to side. The human remains found in the sepulchres of the Bronze Age are both cremated and unburnt, but the former mode of burial was, it appears, the more common. Besides these, they have usually yielded urns, pieces of bronze instruments, ornaments of the same material as well as of gold, jet, and amber, in the form of armlets, rings, neck- laces, and bracelets, and articles of stone or flint, such as a stone battleaxe recovered from the circle at Crichie in * " Historia," sect. 4. 26 CULTURE IN EARLY SCOTLAND. Aberdeenshire. The presence of these objects, which pass under the lugubrious name of " grave goods," affords us an instructive glimpse of the cast of thought of our forefathers of this remote age. They reveal the existence of a custom which survived to historic times in the paganism of Europe, and which even )-et lives, in Catholic countries, in the practice of burying the higher orders of the clergy in full canonicals. The monarch or knight who was interred in the Middle Ages with his weapons and the emblems of his rank, affords another lingering trace of the same primeval custom. It is also prevalent among many rude tribes of modern times. Only, wherever the Christian creed is adopted as its spiritual simplicity, and the close of the earthly life is regarded as the commencement of a higher, the practice is but an unmeaning survival, or a mere tribute of the respect of the living towards those whose dignity is thus recognised even in death. But among those who had not reached this enlightened stage of spiritual idea, — among the rude people of Africa in modern times as among our forefathers of the Bronze Period, — it expresses a natural phase of realistic thought. The future life natural!}' appears to such as a continuation of the life they lead here. The savage or the barbarian is not equal to the refined abstractions of the metaphysician or the theologian. He paints on the canvas of his fancy a Walhalla in which the same world, the same pursuits, the same recreations are reflected. A certain ideal doubtless lends a lighter shimmer to the colouring of his picture of the future. Even the rudest man must have at least the germ of an ideal in his human soul, with that innate susceptibility of sorrow and joy, pain and trial, death and woe. It may lack elevation, perspective ; but the feeling of hunger and cold alone cannot but beget the thought of, the longing for the happier circumstances to which warmth and plenty lend their rosier hues. The Viking sought in his Walhalla, the wild adventures, the fierce combats of his warrior life on earth, but the ideal of a deathless existence in spite of war and wounds transfigured his mundane idea of a future heaven.* All the same his * Lubbock thinks that, if this belief was gener.il, there ought to be found articles in every grave, whereas a large iiroportinn of Bronze Age graves show CONCEPTION OF THE FUTURE LIFE. 2/ future is essentially but the present transposed, and this is true, too, of these children of nature, whose thoughts we may still read in the tombs of their dead. The bereaved Christian who lays the departed in the earth in the hope of a blessed resurrection is not the sole possessor of the con- solation of an inspiring faith. The rude pagan who placed the weapons of the warrior in the stone cist or the death chamber in which he was laid to rest, was not devoid of a comfort as real. He had but passed by the gateway of the erave into a state where he had still need of the tools, the weapons, the ornaments, he had handled in this life. And the emblems of human affection are not more touching, not more expressive in the form of a wreath, or a granite cross, than of a valuable ornament of gold which was placed in many of these graves by one whose affection surmounted greed and taught him self-sacrifice. A shady side there is, however, for such a phase of thought as these grave goods indicate, has often been associated with a grim super- stition. If the warrior chief had need of his weapons and martial ornaments in the region of the dead, did he not also require the services of his slaves and followers ? We know the excessive inhumanity of which this is the cause in many an African community. In Dahomey the death of a king is the occasion of the slaughter of his wives and slaves in order that the deceased may not go forth on his journey into the invisible, bereft of all the joys and services which he enjoyed here. This belief gives rise, indeed, to a con- tinuous slaughter, and the captive taken in war is often feasted and cared for only in order that he may the better bear the message of the king to his sire in the realms of the spirit-world, be the matter ever so trivial. Where such a superstition darkens the mind, life is a miserably cheap commodity, and may even be said to cost more lives than the slave trade ever did. The ancient world, too, furnishes abundant examples of the same inhumanity, resulting from religious belief. 'fc>' no " goods." " The articles found in graves cannot be seriously considered as affording any evidence of a definite belief in a future state of existence ' {" Preh. Times," p. 149). On the other hand, it seems to me most natural that they should have been placed there for this rather than for any other reason. 28 CULTURE IX EARLY SCOTLAND. " The Gauls had once believed, like their Latin neigh- bours, in a shado\v\- existence of the dead, and in some Hades or Elj-sium fashioned after the t\-pe of the present world. The\- used to cast on the funeral pyre whatever things the dead man loved, so that his spirit might enjoy them in the world to coine, and at the end of the funeral, his favourite slaves and dependents were burned alive on the pile to keep their master compan}'."* I am inclined to believe that, as the same belief as to the other world evidently existed among our forefathers of the Bronze Age, so did the practice, and that scenes of suffering characterised their ancestral worship. This has, in fact, been suspected on other and more apposite grounds. When considering similar phenomena of the Stone Age, Dr Latham remarks, " Around a skeleton more or less entire are often found, at regular distances, the ashes of bodies that were burnt, just as if the chief was interred in the flesh, but his subordinates given over to the flames."-f- We may, with Dr Anderson, regard the presence of grave goods as " evidences of the piety and affection which expressed themselves in this manner," or " of the intensity of their devotion to filial memories and family ties,";): and yet .see in them the indica- tion of a brutal practice. Even Cicero could honesth- and enthusiasticall}- say in regard to the gladiatorial games, " It is the greatest pleasure in life to see a brave enemy led off to torture and death." Murder and brutality are after all to a certain extent subjective terms, and ha\'e even found apologists among men professing a religion of uni- versal Love, but who, under the influence of a barbarous intolerance, have regarded the burning of a heretic as serviceable to religion and acceptable to God. Men are thus in morals and religion, as in other things, but the creatures of their age, and a great deal of what is called revelation is in realit}- but the reflection of this fact. " There are in human nature," sa\'s Leckic. " and more especialh' in the benevolent affections, inequalities, * Elton, "Origins of Eng. History, •' p. 266. Cf. Cx-sar, '-Hell. Gall.," l)k. vi., ch. 19. t " Ethnology of Britain," p. 23. X " Scotland in Pagan Times," pp. 96, 227. THE MAN OF THE BRONZE AGE. 29 inconsistencies, and anomalies, of which theorists do not ahvays take account. We should be altogether in error, if we supposed that a man who took pleasure in a gladiatorial combat in ancient Rome, was necessarily as inhuman as a modern would be who took pleasure in the same spectacle. A man who falls but a little below the standard of his own merciful age is often in realitv far worse than a man who had conformed to the standard of a much more barbarous ag-e. even thouq-h the latter will do some things with perfect equanimity from which the other would recoil with horror."* These grave goods, supplemented by the hoards of bronze objects discovered throughout the country, throw lieht also on the mode of life of the inhabitants of North Britain during this remote period. The man of the Bronze Age was evidently a warrior of no mean order. Like the martial Zulu or Basuto of to-day, he was apparently fond of rendering his aspect more formidable by some fantastic head-srear. Portions of what are deemed bronze helmets have been discovered, and though associated with instru- ments of iron, may have been a survival of an earlier culture. When he entered the fray, he bore on his left hand a shield whose surface was ornamented with studs or knobs of the same material. He fought with sword, spear, and dagger. The sword was short, leaf-shaped, double- edged, pointed, but unfurnished with a guard — fitted for thrusting rather than for cutting. Some of them are beauti- ful specimens of workmanship. The dagger and the spear resembled it, in shape, the latter being fixed by a round socket to a wooden shaft. But the warrior was equally expert, it seems, in wielding the axe, with which he felled the giant trees, whose gnarled boughs added to the gloom of the primeval forest. Those axes are mostly wedge- shaped and socketed, and the canoes which, with their aid, and perhaps with that of fire, he hollowed out of the trees, form the rudimentary attempt at marine architecture, which has grown to be one of the triumphant features of Scottish industry. We cannot forbear some sympathetic reflections on the brawny son of Vulcan who wielded the blow that * " History of European Morals," i., p. 305. 30 CULTURE IX KARLV SCOTLAND. rang from the anvil discovered in Suthcrlandshire, and which has ever been a familiar note in the march of civilisa- tion. So, too, have the carpenter, the fisherman, the reaper, the goldsmith, perpetuated their craft through the im- perishable character of the implements they used or the objects they fashioned, enabling us to infer the possession of a practical intelligence, a capacity for industry of various kinds, which reveals the ordered community existing in virtue of the great modern factors of combination and co- operation. War and work — thus swings the pendulum of time as it measures the progress of the race. A very striking feature is the apparent abundance of gold — a fact which is also characteristic of Scandinavian remains of this period.* Nor need this surprise u.s. It is not so long ago that nearly the whole gold coinage of Scotland was minted out of the native metal. The moors of Lanark, the uplands of Dumfries, were the hunting ground of the miner, whose exertions were not infrequently rewarded by the smile of Fortune.f There is thus no necessity for inferring that the precious metal was obtained by barter, and it is not the first time that a country once rich in this metal has subsequently yielded only very scanty supplies. Spain was the Mexico of the ancient world, though the Spaniards afterwards had to seek their El Dorado across the western main. " The Tagus rolled gold, and the Guadiana silver ; the Phoenician sailors were said to have replaced their anchors with masses of silver for which they had no room on board, and the Iberians to have used gold for mangers and silver for their vats of beer."+ The barbarian Briton of the Bronze Age appears, then, to have helped himself liberally from the native ore, and what is more remarkable, judging from the amount of skill and taste he expended on its manufacture into orna- ments, many of which are both massive and elegant in form, to have appreciated its value. A certain strong in- telHf^ence reveals itself in this. Our rude barbarian ancestor • Du Chaillu. '-Viking Age," ch. ix. t Royal Commission appointed to inciuire into the subject of Mining Royalties {2n(l Report). + " Origins of Eng. Hist.," p. 9- PERCEPTION OF THE RELATION OF THINGS. 3 1 of this period did not exult with childish glee over a worth- less trinket like the wild African of modern times. He was in possession of jewellery of no mean workmanship, and of a value equal to large sums of our money — ^jewellery which we can hardly imagine him bartering away for a brass button, like the native of Darkest Africa, to whom a tusk of ivory is worth a few cotton handkerchiefs. There is here a keener perception of the relation of things. The Peruvians, who worked in gold, were, we know, found to be in a far higher state of civilisation than the tribes first discovered by Columbus. Another point in his favour is that his taste and skill were not limited by the value of the material in which he worked. He seems to have carried his sense of beauty, his passion for ornament, into all that he made. The sword and dagger blades are beautifully cast and finished, solidly but neatly fastened by rivets into their handles, which are sometimes decorated with mount- ings of gold ornamented in repousse work. The clay urns found in the tombs, though not turned on the potter's wheel, are well made, and carefully orna- mented by combinations of straight lines. One found under a stone circle at Glenballoch, near Blairgowrie, is, according to Mr Romilly Allen, of such excellent workmanship that " it will compare favourably with those of any other pro- duction of ceramic art, ancient or modern." * The assertion must be taken for what it is worth, but a mere glance at the finer specimens of the art, the mechanical skill, the sense of beauty of those men who worked in bronze and gold, makes it impossible to deny that they had in some respects made an approach to some of the refinements of civilised life. The community ma}- be rude, but these things indi- cate the presence of moulding powers which require but a fair field in order to elevate the culture of the mass. A good workman is one of the greatest forces in the elevation of a cornmunity. He is a teacher to his own generation ; he is a prophet for the future. Skill and taste are the soul of the world's material progress, and this soul is immortal. * '* Proc. Soc. Antiq. Scot.," vol. xiv., p. 90. 32 CULTURE IN EARLY SCOTLAND. CHAPTER IV. ARCHITECTURE AND WAR. THE sense of beauty, going hand in hand with skill in execution, which characterises the remains of the Bronze Culture, becomes still more marked in that of the Iron Age. I do not think we shall err if we regard the tools and weapons made of this metal, and the objects of bronze, or silver, or other material associated with them, as evidence of the presence of men of Celtic race in the island. It is highly probable that it is to this immigration of a new people that we owe the first use of iron in Britain. The culture which it represents can hardly lay claim to a remoter date than the day on which the first Goidelic adventurer or trader anchored his coracle under the shadow of Albion's cliffs, if, indeed, it reach so far back as this. It is certain, at all events, that the type of art of the prehistoric Iron Age is Celtic, the simple forerunner of that intricate style in which the Celtic monk long after- wards gave scope to his taste and fancy. Unlike the com- bination of straight lines of the Bronze Age, it consists of divergent spiral curves, and was very extensivel}' applied. The desire to make a thing beautiful as well as serviceable, betrays itself in the ornamentation of articles for common use as well as the most exquisitely finished jewellery, of the bronze harness of their horses and the stone balls which they threw with a sling, as well as the armlets, bronze hand- mirrors, and other nicnacs of more delicate form and use. Sometimes it is associated with a graceful zoomorphism, as in the case of the armlet found in the sands near the mouth of the Findhorn, which has the form of a coiled serpent, and is so beautifully executed, that it might pass for the work of a highly skilled workman of the nineteenth century. One circumstance is of great significance as tending to confirm the foregoing opinion regarding the comparatively late date of the Iron .Age culture, of which it is a char- TflE LIGHT-BEARING DAWN OF HISTORY. ^^ acteristic feature. A bronze saucepan of Roman manu- facture has been discovered in North Britain, aloncr with a bronze armlet ornamented in this fashion, and we may acquiesce in the conclusion that " the native style of art (iu\, characteristic of the prehistoric Iron A^e) was already in the period of its highest development at or about the time of the Roman occupation of the southern portion of Scotland."* Not only so, but the presence of articles of Roman workmanship in the architectural remains belonmncr to the pagan Iron Age of Scotland, enable us to assign the period of their erection in a more exact manner than was possible in the case of the cairns and stone circles of former epochs. The shadowy night of a remote antiquity begins to merge in the still indistinct, yet light-bearing dawn of history. The tramp of the legions — that first note in the authentic story of many of the tribes of Western Europe— has broken the solitude of the Caledonian forest. It has advanced beyond the Forth and the Tay, receded, died away — hesitating before those rugged, barren mountains, and the foe that lurked in every glen and thicket. Nevertheless its traces are dis- cernible, not merely in Roman camp and road, but amid the ruins of the native structures which have survived the vicissitudes of many centuries. A piece of Samian ware from a broch in Orkney,! a plate of brass and a silver fibula from another at Carnbeath, Dunrobin, bronze dishes and Samian ware from the lake dwellings of Galloway and Ayrshire, stones dressed in Roman fashion from earth- houses in Roxburghshire, Midlothian, and Forfarshire, are indications that the inmates of such dwellings of the Iron Age might have witnessed the march of Severus at the beginning of the third century, or that of Theodosius towards the end of the fourth, and joined in the attempt to defeat their purpose of conquest. These architectural remains are no longer merely the monuments of the dead. They are the dwellings of the living, and their occupants had evidently become conscious in some degree of that moulding power of the human * Anderson, " Scotland in Pagan Times," p. 152. t East Broch of Burray in Orkney. C 34 CULTURE IN EARLY SCOTLAND. spirit, to whose untrammelled exercise modern culture owes its existence. They mean something more than the mere manual dexterity, the mere feeling of taste which we have seen in this and the art of the Bronze Age, though these are very praiseworthy qualities. Thc>- form no contemptible evidence of intellectual activity, of the workings of that creative faculty which marks the progress of man towards the higher civilisation, and which ha\c yielded the greatest triumphs over nature and circumstance. The architect is the first great thinker among a rude people, and this we may affirm of the architect of a structure like the Broch They tell us, too, of the community and the home with a directness which cannot be mistaken, as it might be in the case of the cairn and the stone circle of more remote ages, for here we find no mere memorial of the dead, but the dwell- ings of the living, no "grave goods," but the remains of human habitation. No graves belonging to the pre-christian iron period have, in fact, been discovered. The custom of depositing relics in the resting-places of the dead appears to have become a rare occurrence, if it had not entirel)- gone out of fashion.* Graves in which iron objects had been placed have been explored, but their contents show that they are those of the Viking invader of the ninth and tenth centuries. The structures to which the unmclodious name, brochs, has been given, are found over the whole area of Scotland. Only latel}- a very large one has been investigated at Torwoodlee in Peeblesshire. It possesses a more than ordinary interest, as the northern termination of the Catrail or Picts' Wall, that mysterious line of fortification, which is believed to have extended as far as Peel Fell in North- umberland, and which may yet turn out to be dotted, Roman fashion, with a series of North British strongholds. So far as research has gone, however, the)- arc most numerous in the five northern counties, which alone contain over three hundred. The best preserved specimen is that of Mousa in Shetland ; others might be mistaken at first sight for a cairn of stones, whilst man}', until excavated, are unrecog- nisable under their layer of soil, as the work of a human * Vet this ch.iracteristic of pag.inism wns too widespread to pemiit us to believe that it had altogether ilis.ippenred. BROCHS. 35 hand. But they all reveal the same peculiarity of con- ception, thoun^h variation in detail, showing the influence of the individual mind, just as any other type of our archi- tecture does, is not wanting. Rising to about a height of perhaps fifty feet, they must have resembled in outward form the Nuraghi of Sardinia, or the Round Towers by which the Celtic monks of a later time sought to protect themselves and their property from the attacks of Scandi- navian pirates. The walls, built of unhewn stone, without mortar, are from nine to twenty feet thick at the base. A single door gives access to the interior, w^hich, in the case of that of Mousa, has a diameter of forty-five feet. On the ground floor, several apartments are formed in the wall, and a circular stair leads up through its interior to the summit. After the first ten feet or so, the centre of the wall becomes hollow, so as to allow the formation, b)- a flooring of stone slabs, of several tiers of galleries, which are connected with one another by the stair. These are lighted by loopholes, looking into the area of the tower, so that, with the exception of the entrance, its exterior pre- sents an unbroken solid surface. However unbeautiful its aspect, its internal arrangement is unique, so much so, that it has been regarded as embodying an architectural type, not only confined to Scotland,* but peculiar among all the structures erected by man. It is not too much to say that it would be difficult to conceive a more ingenious con- trivance in stone for the purpose of defence. That this was the idea of the architect is evident. We cannot believe that the builders of these brochs would have incurred so much labour, or hit upon such a peculiar arrangement of the interior in the construction of a mere dwelling. The beehive hut of stone or boughs probably satisfied the ambition of the most extravagant. Regarded then as a stronghold, it must have admirably served its purpose at a time when the most formidable weapons consisted of the war chariot and the iron sword or spear, even if minus the The Irish Cathairs or stone forts bear a resemblance to them, however. See Romilly Allen, " Monumental Hist, of the British Church," pp. 45, 46. The fact of their presence on the Border makes it probable that they may be found south of it. 2,6 CULTURE IN EARLY SCOTLAND. outworks which give an additional strength to some. They presented to the foe a lofty and unbroken barrier on all sides, and if they succeeded in accomplishing the difficult feat of forcing an entrance through the long and narrow passage to the interior, they found themselves in a narrow court exposed to an easy and almost certain discomfiture from the missiles of their assailants in the galleries in the wall above. In the absence of famine and battering rams of great strength, the occupants of the brochs were prac- ticalh- invincible. That they were not the haunts of lawless bands who subsisted by plunder and murder, appears certain when we consider their number and the area over which they are scattered, as well as their situation on or near arable lands. Some of them were not unacquainted with occasional inmates of this character in historic times, when the ro\'ing Viking* dispelled their solitude with the noise of his roystering feasts. The Saga has preserved a love tale or two, to lend them the interest of romance. More than once the gallant jarl found an impregnable refuge for himself and his fair bride from the pursuit of some outwitted rival. But this was an accidental and later use of these ancient Celtic strongholds, which, to judge from the remains of an earlier culture discovered in them b}- Dr Anderson, Mr Rhind, Dr Joass, and others, were occupied about the dawn of the historic era by a people who were settled cultivators of the soil, and who erected them to protect, on emergency, their lives and property. That the}- were not averse to fighting when necessity or advantage rendered it desirable, is more than probable from what we know of the warlike character of the northern tribes, but they were certainly not un- acquainted with the arts and industries of a peasant com- munity.! They ground the corn which they reaped from * A Scandinavian origin has been ascribed to them, but the facts are more in favour of the view that they are Celtic — the defensive works of a settled population, not the strongholds of the Norse marauder. t I differ from Dr Anderson, who represents them as exclusively peace- al)le, industrious, farming communities, forgetting that history presents us with an independent, spirited, and booty-loving people, who descended from their hills and forests into the Roman settlements on the slightest provocation. LAKE DWELLINGS. 37 the surrounding lands in stone querns or handmills. They reared the goat, the sheep, the ox, the pig, the dog, and the horse, hunted the deer, and fished the bays and lochs. The presence of moulds and crucibles shows that they made their own ornaments and articles of domestic use, such as pins of bone and bronze, stone lamps, and drinking cups, &c. Native craftsmen manufactured the iron swords, spears, knives, axes, chisels, pincers, &c., which formed their weapons and implements. The women did the spinning and weaving,* made the pottery, and ground the grain. Thus those gaunt walls, the witness may be of the want and fear that war begets, resounded likewise with the cheerier notes of a rude but settled domestic life. The manufactured articles, as well as the animal remains, discovered in the lake dwellings mostly resemble those found in the brochs. These dwellings are composed of various la}-ers of logs, rising tier upon tier over the bottom of the lake, with masses of brushwood, stones, and gravel, inter- spersed, until a height of several feet abov'e the surface has been attained. A paling of oak piles, whose opposite sides were connected by transverse beams, mortised into them at intervals, as the work of building proceeded, served to bind the whole mass firmly together. The uppermost layer of logs thus afforded a solid and stable area on which the lake dwellers erected their huts. To obviate the risk of falling into the water, to which their children and cattle were exposed, the little hamlet rising on its surface was encircled by a barrier of hurdles or similar fence. The canoes, which have been rescued in a wonderful state of preservation from the deep mud in which they have long lain, afforded means of communication with the shore, but access was also provided by a submerged wooden gangway, for the passage of their cattle.t * At least the discover}' of spindle whorls, to the number of thirty in one broch, and the presence along with them of eighteen combs, resem- liling in form those still used in India, and several smoothing bone instru- ments, much worn, have been regarded as warranting this conclusion. + As an example of the wild notions that often pass for learning, take the following, which is the latest I have seen: — "The poems of the British Merddin or Merlin clearly indicate that the practice of building houses in the water arose out of the desire to escape from the superintendence of reforming 38 CULTURE IN EARLY SCOTLAND. Unlike the brochs, the type is not confined to Scotland. It was at one time a common form of dwelling throughout Europe, and was known to Herodotus,* whose description of the village settlement on the Roumelian lake furnishes us with a living picture of the semi-civilised communities, who, with no less skill than labour, raised the Pfahlbauten of the Swiss lakes.f the crannogs of the Irish bogs, the Scottish lochs, and the English meres and fens. Their historic antiquity is thus very great, but, as we have already seen, this kind of defensive structure has been assigned to as early a period as the Age of Stone. Those belonging to a later time are characterised by greater boldness of idea and skill in execution, being no longer built on shallows near the shore, but in deep water and at a considerable distance from the land. Those investigated by Dr Monro I in the lochs of Galloway and Ayrshire are no inconsiderable specimens of this kind of architecture. Their builders cannot claim the merit of having invented a contrivance uniquely ingenious in the sense that the brochs are. They merely made use of a derived idea, and we may see in the ruinsof their pile settlements— which were evidently occupied about the period of the Roman rule in Scotland — onl)- the improved imitation of the rude attempt of the primeval savage to protect himself from danger. Dr Monro, in his lavish praise of the mechanical genius of the lake-dwellers of North Britain, has overlooked this. But it argues no little resource and industry to construct so simple, yet so effective a fortress. To lay in the soft bottom of a deep lake the foundation of a firm structure, which formed per- haps the home of many successive generations, and whose ruins preserve even yet a considerable portion of their work intact, is a feat of engineering in its way. He further thinks that there is only one hypothesis that can satisfactorily rulers, who sought to abolish human sacrifices. . . . There is no evidence that the Cymri or any other Celtic people took to pile villages, . . . their structures were of stone, not of wood (1), and their foundation was necessarily the solid earth" (Cainpl)cil, "The llittites: Their Inscriptions and History," ii. 298). * Bk. v., c. 16. + Investigated and described liy l>r Ferdinand Keller. + " Ancient .Scottish Lake Dwellings." EARTH HOUSES. 39 account for all the facts and phenomena which his investi- gations have placed before the reader, viz., that these lake dwellings were constructed by the population of the south- west of Scotland, for the protection of their lives and movable property from the attacks of Angles. Picts, and Scots, on the withdrawal of the Roman troops. The ancient date of these structures in Switzerland gives, however, a much wider scope for fixing their date in Scotland, especially in view of what was apparently the warlike state of society before the advent of the Romans. We are indebted to the plough for the discovery of the earth houses, which are found mostly underneath arable land, from the Border to Shetland. Like the brochs and the lake dwellings, they are constructed on a uniform plan, viz., that of a long, low, narrow, curved gallery, with sides, floor, and roof of stone — always widening and increasing in height from the low and narrow entrance inwards. Like the lake dwellings, too, they seem to have been in common use in Northern Europe. Posidonius mentions their use as grain stores by the population of Southern Britain. They must have resembled the underground structures mentioned by Tacitus,* which ordinarily served the purpose of granaries among the Germans, and which afforded them shelter from the rigours of winter and a secret retreat for their property in time of invasion. They formed, too, a common mode of dwelling among American tribes at a much lower stage of culture than the Germans or the Southern Britons, since they resorted to this type of structure when unable to take advantage of the ready shelter of caves. They appear in the Saras as the haunt of the outlaw. The traces of an over- p-round dwelling in connection with some of these in North Britain shows, however, that this was not their ordinary pur- pose, and the contents of those at Cairn Conan and other places disclose the presence of a settled population, who, like the occupants of the other structures of the pagan Iron Age, had to a certain extent felt the influence of Roman civilisa- tion—cultivated grain, reared cattle and sheep, and used, in addition to stone utensils of a rude character, wheel-made pottery and implements of iron, bronze, and lead. * " Germania," c. xvi. 40 CULTURE IN EARLY SCOTLAND. There is little in the picture that we are thus enabled to conjure from these structures of the pagan Iron Age in Scotland that does not harmonise with the first historic glimpses of the condition of the people furnished b}- Greek and Roman authors. P}-theas, who was sent, several centuries before the Christian era, by the Greek merchants of Marseilles on a vo)-age of discover}' along the western coast of Europe, to Britain, the Baltic, and the far north, wrote an account of his observations and adventures, which was as popular in the ancient world as the travels of Captain Cook in the modern. The loss of his diary is one of those irretrievable calamities from which the earl}- histor}- of so man}- countries has suffered, but fragments have been preserv-ed by his commentators and critics, Eratosthenes, Pol}-bius, Strabo, and others.* This accurate " Humboldt of his age "t remained, on his own confession, for some time in Britain, and visited most of its accessible parts. All that remains of his observations in reference to the north of the island is confined to a note of the strange phenomenon presented by the absence of night in summer, but the sug- gestive picture which he drew of the inhabitants of the southern regions has fortunatel}' been handed down. " The natives," he tells us, " collect the sheaves of wheat in great barns and thrash out the corn there, because the}- have so little sunshine that our open thrashing-places would be of little use in that land of clouds and rain. There are cultivated fruits, a good abundance of some domestic animals, a scarcity of others ; the inhabitants feed on millet and other vegetables, and on fruit, and the roots of plants, and they make a beverage of wheat and honey.";J: Posidonius, a later traveller, who is believed to have visited the east of Britain, besides the mining district of Cornwall, is credited with the authorship of a similar picture of the agricultural communities, resembling man}- of the African tribes of our time, which then inhabited the largest of the islands " that lie in the ocean." Naturally the southern tribes had reached a more advanced stage of * See Elton, "Origins of English Hislory," p. 14. + Ijrehmer, " Entdeckungcn im Aiterthum," ii,, p. 345. J Strabo, iv. 201. Cf. Elton, pp. 30-32. EVIDENCE HARMONISES WITH FIRST HIST. GLIMPSES. 4I culture, owing- to intercourse with their kindred on the opposite shores of the channel, who were powerfull)' in- fluenced by the civilisation of the Mediterranean. Speaking of Belerium, the modern Cornwall, Posidonius says, "The inhabitants of that promontory are very fond of strangers, and, from their intercourse with foreign merchants, are civilised in their manner of life."* Caesar and Strabo, on the other hand, had gleaned a little information about the interior tribes, and as we should expect, represent them as considerably lower in the scale of civilisation. But it is difficult to believe that even at that earl}' time the}' were almost wholly unacquainted with the cultivation of the soil. " Most of the inland people," writes the former,-f- " grow no corn, and are clad in the skins of beasts." On the other hand, we may not forget the general assertion of Tacitus, more than a century afterwards, that " the soil of Britain is fertile, and }'ields corn in great plenty.":]: The state of the country, and the comparativel}- thin population, preclude the idea of agriculture on a modern scale. The trackless forest, the wide moor, the un- drained plain, covered with furze or buried underneath treacherous marshes, were for centuries after the commence- ment of the historic period, the haunt of the wild beast — the wolf, the bear, the wild ox. The progress of cultivation was but very gradual. Even the Romans, the eloquence of their orators notwithstanding, left many a square mile of unreclaimed ground as virgin soil for the spade and the plough of the Christian monk in after-times. Many an acre in Aberdeenshire has been reclaimed from the supre- macy of whin and broom since m}^ bo}^hood. Still the northern tribes to which we are introduced in the pages of Tacitus are not mere hordes of naked savages as in the hearsa}' and credulous reports of Herodian and Dion Cassius. They are an active, high-spirited people, and if the great historian may sometimes have heightened the colours of his descriptions for the purpose of adding effect to the picture of his hero, it is not too much to infer that the culture of a people whose defence of home and fatherland cost Agricola several campaigns, who thwarted so effectuall}^ * Diod. Sic, V. 22. t "De Bell. Gall.,'' v. 14. : "Agricola," c. xii. 42 CULTURE IN EARLY SCOTLAND. the ambition of Severus, and eventually overwhelmed the Roman province itself, was at least that which is represented in the ruins of the brochs, and which evidently extended into, and partly beyond, the Roman period. The fact that these structures — brochs, lake dwellings, underground houses — like the numerous forts that crown the lesser ridges of our Scottish hills, are meant for defence or shelter is very significant. It throws an ominous light on the condition of the country during the period of their occupation. They are just the structures which we should expect to find among a people to whom security of life and property was a very precarious privilege. They had not reached the stage of culture which makes an effective government and a united nation possible. The first historic glimpse that we get of the population of North Britain, from the map of Ptolemy and the pages of Tacitus, tends to confirm this conclusion. At the dawn of reliable history we find the inhabitants of Caledonia divided into a large number of tribes. The Novantai and the Selgovas, whose name has perpetuated itself in the modern Solway, occupied the wilds of Galloway. North and east from them were the Dumnonii and the Otadini, who shared between them the remainder of the lowlands south of the Forth. The inhabitants of the regions beyond that river appear in the Latin poets of the first century (Lucan, Martial, Valerius Flaccus, Statins) under the general name of the Caledonians, but they consisted of numerous and frequently hostile tribes such as Caledonians and Vacomagi, in parts of the modern Argyleand Perth shires; Vernicomes and Taixali, in P^orfar and Aberdeen ; PIpidii, Cerones, Carini, along the north-west coast ; Cornavii and Decants, in the remote north-east. According to the latest authority* on this subject, the most northerly of these clans were a non- Aryan, and consequently non -Celtic race, and represented such of the earlier inhabitants of Britain as had not amalgamated with the hordes of Celtic invaders, but had been forced by the Goidel or Gaelic Celt ever farther into the northern fastnesses, as he, in his turn, had to yield * Professor Rhys, " Ccllic Britain, " p. 223. Cf. " Kliiml Lectures," by the same author. TRIBAL DIVISION AND WARFARE. 43 [Tround to the Brythonic Celts, who came after him. This view is merely the result of the difficult attempt to extract historic information from Celtic names compared with what its author considers to be the traces of a non-Celtic language in North Britain. It may, at least, claim in its favour the probability that the course of invasion from the Continent would naturally be what it implies — a gradual expansion northward of those who did not amalgamate with the invader, leading us to look for such remnants of the original population in the more remote and less attractive districts of the island. Professor Rhys is further of opinion, that, though at first rendered tributary by the Goidelic tribes, they had succeeded, before the departure of the Romans, in recovering supremacy in northern independent Britain. However this may be, we find the population beyond the Roman frontier, in the latter part of the fourth century, still divided into at least two leading tribes, while the generic name of the Caledonian of the poets had given place to that of the Picts, first mentioned by Eumenius about the end of the third century (,296). This twofold division is noticed by Dion Cassius and Ammianus Marcellinus.* It is still observable in the time of Bseda.f who speaks of the Northern and Southern Picts. The name refers to the habit of tattooing the body,:): and was originally applicable to all the inhabitants of Britain, but towards the end of the Roman occupation it became limited, with the probable exception of the inhabitants of Galloway, to the tribes beyond the northern wall, among whom the practice naturally survived longer than in the south. Thus the divided condition of the population, as dis- closed by the first historic glimpses, is such as explains the presence of the many strongholds and shelters whose ruins * The former names them Caledonii and MeatK, the latter Dicalidonre and Vecturiones. + "Hist. EccL." lib. iii., c. 4. J The custom was widely prevalent in the ancient world, as we learn from Herodotus and others. Sidonius, Bishop of Clermont in the fifth centurj', graphically speaks of some Saxons who daubed their faces with blue stain. I myself have seen in South Africa the Red Kaffirs who made use of clay of this colour to improve their appearance. 44 CULTURE IX EARLY SCOTLAND. still have a sifrnificant testimony. Though they could com- bine when threatened by a common danger, as Agricola and Severus found by experience in many a hard-contested fight, and though, under the ominous name of Picts, they shook the Roman power in Britain to its base more than once, the bond seems to have been fragile at the best. The sound of strife, the clang of sword and spear, rang through the glens and forests of Caledonia, and the combatants were not always Roman and native. The smoke of burning village, the desolation and carnage that mark the track of human hate and strife, bespoke the presence of internal feud as well as of the foreign conqueror. Cciesar,* speaking of the Gaulish tribes, significantly remarks that previous to his time they were engaged in almost annual conflicts, either by aggressive expeditions against some neighbour or by defending their territory from external attack. Tacitus,! in like manner, speaks of the Britons as a " fierce and savage people, running wild in the woods, ever addicted to a life of warfare," and as divided into factions under various chieftains — a circumstance, he adds, "highly favourable to the Roman arms against a warlike people — independent, fierce, and obstinate." Tribal wars, invasion from without, this was the histor}' of Caledonia for generations before the advent of the legions, as it was for so many centuries after- wards, even when central government had found expression in the form of the feudal monarch)-. Nevertheless, these structures, if the)- tell of strife and invasion, tell also of the desire, in some degree, and the precaution to avoid them. They are significant, it is true, of unsettled times, significant also of the preference of their occupants for an industrious domestic life over the pursuit of war, atid the love of plunder, at a time when every human abode of which we have an)- knowledge was a stronghold or a hiding-place, and when the temptation to disorganisation was a strong one. The effort to maintain the community and the home, independence and industrv, such as the contents of these brochs, lake dwellings, and earth houses reveal, must count as an important fact in the culture of a people. Certainly it was not that which is * •' De Bell. Gall.," vi. 15. +" Agricola,"' c. xxi. ; (■/: c. xii. THE CALEDONIAN OF THE ROMAN EPOCH. 45 conjured before us by a Herodian or a Dion Cassius.* The Caledonian of the Roman epoch was no brutah'sed savage or semi-aquatic animal, who passed the greater portion of his time swimming in the lochs, or hiding from his foe in the mud, with only his head visible above the marsh, who roamed without hut or hamlet over the rugged mountains and the bare moors, and who subsisted almost exclusively on the produce of the chase, or on the nuts and wild fruits of the woods. Such a description might have applied to the savage tribes of the Stone Age, and it is not inconceivable that, just as in the case of the remote inhabitant of the glens and islands in modern times com- pared with those of the cities and fertile tracts of the Lowlands, there were communities whose condition was rude and primitive. But it is impossible to believe that this was an accurate account of the warlike peoples of the third and fourth centuries of our era, whose inroads spread terror and ravage over the Roman province. Whilst Herodian describes the Caledonians as barbarians of a very low type, the fact that he mentions that they possessed iron swords and war chariots does not harmonise with the description, and is an evidence of the absence of accurate observation. However wretched their condition might have appeared to the highly civilised Roman or Greek traveller, we must guard against accepting the tales which had their origin in the " yarns " of the Roman soldier, and which were welcomed as fact by a credulous and supersti- tious author like Dion Cassius. " It frequently happened," says Tacitus,-f- in his description of Agricola's campaign against the Caledonians, " that in the same camp were seen the infantry and cavalry intermingled with the sailors, all indulging their joy, full of their adventures, and magnify- ing the history of their exploits ; the soldier describing in the usual style of military ostentation the forests which he had passed, the mountains which he had climbed, and the barbarians whom he had put to the rout ; while the sailor, no less important, told of storms and tempests, the wonders of the deep, and the spirit with which he had * " Herodian," iii. 14 ; Dion Cassius (Xiphilinus, Ixxvi. 12). t " Agricola," c. x.\v. 46 CULTURE IN EARLY SCOTLAND. conquered winds and waves." It is significant that the same author has omitted to enliven his pages with such stories, preferring, as he puts it, " the plain truth, to con- jecture which previous writers adorned with all the graces of language."* Even Procopius.t as late as the sixth century, gravely invests the region north of the wall of Antoninus with purgatorial horrors that might stand for a picture from Dante or Milton. These northern latitudes, with their rugged scenery and wild seas, all the more impressive from their remoteness from, and unlikeness to the fairer lands of the south, afforded from very ancient times an apt theme for the imaginative Greek romancers, whose productions, such as " Wonders beyond Thule," " Hyper- boreans," &c., were among the most popular works of fiction of antiquity. From these arose the travellers' tales of one-footed men, of Germans with monstrous feet and ears, of fantastic kings in Thule, and Irish tribes who devoured their parents. They thus allowed fancy to plaj' the same havoc with the histor}^ and geography of the islands and peninsulas of the far north, as in the case of the unex- plored regions of the remote south. '• The ancients," says Gibbon,:): "who had a very faint and imperfect knowledge of the great peninsula of Africa, were sometimes tempted to believe that the torrid zone must ever remain destitute of inhabitants, and they sometimes amused their fancy by filling the vacant spaces with headless men, or rather mon- sters, with horrid and cloven-footed sat}'rs, with fabulous centaurs, and with human pigmies, who waged a bold and doubtful warfare against the cranes." With such pictures of a little known or inferior race we must contrast the testimony of those ruins found in the glens and the lochs of Scotland, which reveal a stage of culture, barbarian indeed, but not savage. All the same there is a danger in using such terms as "culture,"' "civilisation," "organisa- tion," and so forth, in regard to these prehistoric ancestors of ours — a danger which our archaeologists iiave not alwajs * " Agiicola," c. .\. t So deadly was the air, so horrible the reptiles, that it would be impossible for a man to live half an hour. X " Decline ami Fall of the Roman Empire,'" vol. iv., p. 204 (Milman's edition). THE REALITY OF THINGS. 47 avoided — the danger, viz., of forgetting the reality of things. While a high civilisation may co-exist among the same people with one that is much ruder, as in the case of the dwellers in the Black Houses of the Hebrides, and the makers of the coarse Barvas pottery, who inhabit the same country with the owner of the magnificent villa, and the manufacturer of the finest hardware, wc may safely con- clude that the possession of implements or ornaments which reveal cleverness of workmanship, or the abilit}- to build structures of no mean strength, was not associated with that degree of civilisation which we to-day would call comfortable, or even bearable. Compared with the con- veniences and requirements of modern times, or with the state of civilisation in ancient Greece, Rome, Persia, or Egypt, the existence of our forefathers, whether of the Iron or of the Bronze Age, must have been rude at the best, and would be wretched in the extreme to us their refined posterity. That it was natural and enjo}'able to them is likely enough, for man is always more or less the creature of his age ; and it is, alas ! the curse of a high civilisation like ours to break in upon the rude content- ment, the natural simplicity of the barbarian, and degrade and kill him off with vices, or with improvements to which he is a stranger. Only let us not idealise away the realism of such scenes by the use of a learned terminology, as the archsologists are apt to do. Culture, civilisation, organisa- tion, &c., the remains of these dim ages, we have sought to traverse, do disclose, but only in a relative sense. Even Augustus, it has been facetiously, though not quite cor- rectly, remarked, had neither glass to his windows, nor a shirt to his back 1 Whilst then giving our rude forefathers credit for ingenuity, for taste, for skill — culture of a kind — we should have to make large reservations in the use of words when drawing a comparison with the culture of our age, if we would keep by the truth. 48 cClture in early scotlaxd. CHAPTER V. CELTIC PAGANISM. WE may safely conclude that there was no written literature among the northern tribes in prehistoric times. So long as our forefathers remained savages — cave-dwellers, who used only stone implements and weapons — their stage of culture precludes the idea. " No race of men in the Stone Age," says Lubbock,* " had attained the art of communicating facts by means of letters, or even by the far ruder system of picture writing, nor does anything perhaps surprise the savage more than to find that Europeans can communicate with one another by means of a few black scratches on a piece of paper." Not that the savage does not possess qualities of mind which, when trained, might produce the most exquisitely naive poetry. " Savages have been for untold ages, and still are, living in the myth-making stage of the human mind,"t — amid those fancies, whose realism brightens or terrorises their existence. They understand so far the art of interpretation, of com- bination, inasmuch as the}' can give expression in tale or song to their unsophisticated contemplation of the uni\-erse. We may, indeed, hear the echo of a primc\al antiquity in some portions of that traditional lore in which Scotland is so rich. Nor was the cave-dweller of the Paktolithic age a contemptible artist, as we have seen. But the art of com- municating his thoughts, otherwise than by a childish realistic language, was a mystery to him. In one sense, the savage of the Stone Age did give expression to his thoughts in more durable, significant fashion, in the great stone piles which cover the dead, and testify to the presence of definite ideas, but this dumb eloquence in stone is the only e\idence of any attempt to render his thoughts in outward fashion, which the savage of the Stone Age has, or could have left * " Orijjin of Civilisation," p. 47. + Tylor, " Primitive Culture," p. 283. PAGAN LITERATURE. 49 US. We may see in the mysterious tracings on the blocks of Aberdeenshire granite the attempt to render thought by tangible signs.* In the, to me, inscrutable forms of the double disc and the crescent, the fish, the serpent, the bird,&c., may be the record of the religious ideas of far remote times. These hieroglyphic inscriptions may thus represent, like the use of images and pictures in Catholic countries, an attempt at popular education, and some future Champollion may disclose their significance, but they do not probably reach beyond the Celtic settlement, if, indeed, as Dr Anderson asserts, they are not symbols of the early Christian period.! At all events I do not think that the bards, who, accord- ing to Lucan, perpetuated the memory of the fallen brave by their praises, wrote their poems,:): or the priests their prayers, or the chiefs their laws, before the dawn of our era. The Gaulish Druids were acquainted with letters, and made their calculations in Greek characters, but this was due to the influence of the Greek culture of Marseilles. Speaking of the romanising of the natives of Southern Gaul during the first century B.C., Mommsen§ says, " In early times Hellenism had also to a certain degree influenced these regions ; the elements of a higher culture, the stimulation of the culture of the vine and the olive to the u.se of writing and to the coining of money came to them from Massillia." The ruder and more conservative devotees il of the Druid * Some have seen in these a trace of Phoenician influence. The Phoenicians of Carthagena and Cadiz might have been responsible for these and for the introduction of letters at an early period, if their trade extended, as was long believed, to the Scilly Isles ; but the Cassiterides of Herodotus and other authors are now believed to have been a group of islands off the coast of Spain, and the British tin trade with the Continent was begun at a later time by the merchants of Southern Gaul. Lubbock, however, is a strong advocate of the Phoenician connection with the Scilly Isles. t The wild but erudite author of " The Hittites: their History and Inscrip- tions," will have it that these mysterious markings are the handwriting of this ancient Turanian people. He confidently asserts, too, that many of the chief figures of Celtic lore are only Hittites in disguise. The Highlander in search of a pedigree need now be at no loss. X "The Britons," says Tacitus, "like all barbarous nations, have no written records " (" Agricola," c. ii.). § " History of Rome," iv. 214 (Dicksons translation). II Cresar, " De Bell. Gall.," lib. vi., c. 13, says that in order to make them- selves themselves more thoroughly acquainted with its rites, Gaulish students went to Britain. D 50 CULTURE IN EARLY SCOTLAND. cult in Britain trusted to unwritten tradition — that living literature of the early ages of a people.* Of the religious cult that prevailed in the earlier ages of Britain, we have no knowledge beyond what is disclosed by the tombs of the dead. The presence of " grave goods " is, as we have seen, an evidence that our ancestors of remote prehistoric times had a faith. This is more than has been asserted of several rude tribes of modern times. Observers not inclined to scepticism in such matters — Christian mis- sionaries, both Catholic and Protestant — have recorded their inability to discover any trace of religious belief or practice among the African and American communities, whose gross ignorance they sought to dispel. Cassalis, Moffat, Father Dobritzhoffer, were not likely to rush to hasty conclusions of this kind, yet the evidence from which they drew them has been found, on closer scrutiny, not to warrant such inferences. Facts are recorded which, as Dr Tylor has shown, contradict these assertions. We mean religion in a relative sense, of course. It would be in vain to look for any reasoned system of belief among those who in reason are mere children. There is force in the remark of Lubbock,! " As regards the lowest races of men, it seems to me even a priori\Q.xy difficult to suppose that a people so backward as to be unable to count their own fingers should be sufficiently advanced in their intellectual conceptions as to have any system of belief worthy of the name of a religion." A system of belief. Certain!}- not. That would imply a dialectic process far bc}-ond the powers of the savage ; but there may be religions without system, and the religious instinct or sentiment asserts itself in some form or other in every human soul capable of fear, wonder, longing. The idea of the supernatural ma}- be absent, for the savage does not define in the manner of the theologian of the * O'Curry, however (lect. i.), is of opinion, which he bases on MSS. belonging, as he thinks, to the period of the introduction of Christianity into Ireland in the fifth century, that the Druids were in possession of books before the arrival of .St Patrick. Many ancient writings fell a prey to the Danish occupation of Ireland. Hut what space the word "ancient" covers is a question, and the enthusiastic Celtic scholars may be trusted not to limit it too much. t "Origin of Civilisation," p. 213. Tin; RELIGION OF THE CELT. $1 higher faith.s. Yet some notion of the immaterial exerts its influence, so tar as our knowledge goes, on every reason- able being. Whatever the rude creed of the remoter inhabitants of the Stone and Bronze Ages, our Celtic ancestors had attained a comparatively advanced stage of religious cul- ture. We find them, in the pages of Cssar and Tacitus, in possession of a priestly ritual, with temples, idols, and sacrifices, devoted to the service of the divine hierarchy. The Celts, like other branches of the Aryan race, carried A\ith them, in their wanderings from their predisruption home, a theology in which their ideas of the divine had found expression. Their religion bore the same character as that of the Greeks or the Latins, or any other Aryan people — a system of polytheism, more or less elaborate and refined, according to their state of culture. The household had its altar, at which the head of the family, as among the ancient Germans, offered the worship of its members, until supplanted by the priesth- class, which succeeded in usurping the functions of religion.* By the time that history begins to throw a dim light on the sombre seclu- sion of the north, the Celtic tribes of Britain and Gaul were a priest-ridden people, and if they had asserted in some cases their right to free government, they submitted to a terrible form of sacerdotal tyranny. " The whole nation of the Gauls is extremely religious," says Caesar, " and therefore those who are afflicted with grievous diseases, or exposed to dangers in war or otherwise, either offer men as victims, or vow to sacrifice themselves. At these sacrifices the Druids officiate." t The wrath of their savage deities, he further tells us, could only be appeased by the shedding of human blood, and when the supply of criminals, who were thought the most acceptable to the gods, failed, they did not hesitate to force the innocent to mount the sacrificial pile, whose awful glare lighted up the oak groves, where they celebrated their inhuman rites. ^ Other * Prof. Rhys holds that Druidism was originally not a Celtic cult, but adopted by the Celts from a non-Aryan people in the west of Europe, whom they conquered. Evidence of this is not forthcoming, however. t "De Bell. Gall.," vi., c. i6. i IhiJ. 52 CULTURE IN EARLY SCOTLAND. writers * add that they sometimes crucified, sometimes slew, their victims with the sword, or with arrows, and drew their auguries from the contortions of their bodies, or from the flow of their blood. So prodigal of human life were those grim priests, that they were wont to proclaim that the crops would be abundant in proportion to the harvest of death. The imagination quails before the awful picture — the smoke and blood-bcgrimmed Druids, in richl)- embroidered robes, resplendent with ornaments of massive gold, mingling their savage chant with the shrieks of their victims — and yet we need not assume that it was overdrawn, or that Caesar was merely recounting the hearsay and untrust- worthy evidence which he, as a practical soldier, took no trouble to question, and Pliny was simply conjuring the spectres of his own credulit\-.t Inhumanit)- of this sort, springing from priestly delusion and despotism, is, alas ! no solitar}- exception in the annals of mankind. It is not so long ago that Europe was ringing with the cry of religious persecution, and the burning of witches and heretic preachers was accounted the sacred duty of the Christian magistrate. Even in our day brutal orgies are celebrated in man}' an African grove, and the watchword of some fanatic might spread death and hatred in many a civilised communit}-. This phase of the crude and inhuman fanaticism which man has so often mistaken for religion, and which was grimly exemplified by the Druids, left its trace far into historic times in Europe. The idea not merely perpetuated itself, till comparatively recentl}-, in some of the popular beliefs regarding witchcraft — such, for instance, as that one man must die in order to secure the recover}- of another:^: — but the fact was not unknown in Northern Europe as late as the tenth century. At Upsala there was a celebrated temple, round which the ghastl}' displa}- of the corpses of the human victims sacrificed b}' the priests of Odin was to be seen in the time of Adam of Bremen. The practice only }'ielded to the influence of Christianit}' in those * Strabo, "Geog.," lil). iv. ; Dio.l. .'^ic. '• Hist.." lil.. v., c. 31. Cf. Pliny, •' Hist. Nat.," lib. xvi. t Burton, " History of Scotland,'" vol. i., ch. vi. X See some striking instances in Leslie Forbes, " The Early Races of Scotland." ITS SANGUINARY RITES. 53 northern countries which had not come under the civih's- ing influence of the Romans. Even after the humanising doctrines of Jesus had become the popular creed, the power of this grim rite occasionally asserted itself in the practice of slaying or burying a victim, before or during the erec- tion of a building, in the belief that only thus could it be made secure.* " L'usage de tuer un homme pour que son esprit demeure attache a I'endroit de sa mort et en soit le gardien se pratique dans de nombreux pays." f Though such bloody rites were expressly forbidden by the Romans, B.C. 95, the custom lingered till the time of Constantine, when a gladiator appears to have been sacrificed to Jupiter Latialis. A people, who looked upon the savage combats of the circus, or the slaughter by each other of the unfortunate captives that added glory to the triumph of the Roman commander, would not be easily shocked by an occasional excess of this kind. There is indeed evi- dence enough that the Aryan race in its earlier stages of culture had not surmounted the sombre idea that so long coloured man's relation to his deity, and which is but thinly disguised sometimes in the beautiful diction of Hebrew patriarch and prophet. The Celts of Gaul and Britain need not therefore be credited with merely having adopted it:|: from the non- Aryan race that they conquered and partly absorbed in their progress westwards. The suppression by the Romans was owing, not merely to the sanguinary character of its rites, but to the power and patriotism of the priests. " The Roman government, which elsewhere let alone all local peculiarities of worship with indifferent toleration, contemplated this Druidic system, not merely in its extravagances, but as a whole, w^ith apprehension. The institution of the Gallic annual festi- val in the purely Roman capital of the country (Lugdinum, Lyons), and with the exclusion of any link attaching to the national culture, was evidently a counter-move of the * The Old Irish "Life of Cohimba '' represents him as sacrificing Odran when landing in lona, in order to gain the protection of Heaven — a tradition which at least points to the prevalence of the custom in ancient times. t Gaidos, " Melusine," iv. 16. X Rhys, " Celtic Britain," p. 69. 54 CULTURE IX EARLY SCOTLAND. government against the old religion of the country, with its yearly council of priests at Chartres, the centre of the Gallic land. . . . That the occupation of Britain, which had been from of old the chief seat of these priestly actings, was in good part resolved on in order to get thereby at the root of the evil, will be fully set forth in the .sequel."* Accordingly, in this island, we find the priests, who had remained untinctured b}- the Greek culture of Southern Gaul, where the sacred groves were schools of instruction in philosophy, astronomy, geography, and theo- logy.! as well as places of sacrifice, in possession of the more literal orthodoxy that signalises a cruder culture, and animated b\- a fierce patriotic spirit, fomenting resistance and rebellion, inspiring their followers with the daring of fanaticism, and inflaming them with the glory of fighting for their gods and their altars, as well as for their homes and hearths. Hence they were particular!}- obnoxious to the Roman invaders, and their ritual and power, not merely as priests, but as lawgivers and judges,:^ were overwhelmed in the ruins of the national independence. But the vivid pen of Tacitus has pictured to us these grim functionaries, and the awful recesses of their blood\- groves, ere their cult was transformed into the harmless nature worship, com- bined with a strong belief in magic, which we shall find it in the biographies of the earl\- missionaries. Describing the conquest of Anglese)- b\- the legions under Suetonius Paulinus in A.i>. 6i — "The Druids," he sa\-s, "were ranged in order, with hands uplifted, invoking the gods, and pour- ing forth terrible imprecations. The novelt)' of the sight struck the Romans with awe and terror ; they stood in stupid amazement, as if their limbs were benumbed, riveted to one spot, a mark for the enem\'. The exhortations of the general by-and-by diffused new vigour throughout the ranks, and the men by mutual reproaches inflamed each other to deeds of valour. Thc\- felt the disgrace of yielding to a troop of women and a band i^f fanatic priests ; the\- advanced * Mommsun, "Provinces of the Roui.in Empire," i., \>. 105 (Dickson's translation). t Ccesar, " De I?eII. Call." lil.. vi.. c. 14. : //>i\L, vi. 13. HOSTILITY OF THE ROMANS. 55 their standards, and rushed to the attack with impetuous fury. The Britons perished in the flames which they themselves had kindled ; the island fell, and a garrison was established to retain it in subjection ; the religious groves, dedicated to superstitious and barbarous rites, were levelled to the ground. In these recesses the natives embrued their altars with the blood of their prisoners, and in the entrails of men explored the will of the gods."* " Thus," remarks Mommsen, " the old vehement Celtic faith, which had given the Romans so much trouble, burst forth once more, for the last time, in a mighty flame." t On another occasion, when the barbarians north of the Forth were preparing to resist the advance of Agricola, the same author speaks of "the solemn rites and sacrifices":;: with which the>- celebrated their league in the cause of freedom, but, unfortunately, does not delineate the picture as in the above graphic fashion. Lucan, his contemporary, in his apostrophe of the Druids, is not more explicit on the sub- ject, but, like Cffisar, adds a little to our knowledge of their creed. " And you, ye Druids, now that the sword was removed, began once more your barbaric rites and weird solemnities. To you only is given knowledge or ignorance (whichever it be) of the gods and the powers of heaven ; your dwelling is in the lone heart of the forest. From you we learn that the bourne of man's ghost is not the sense- less crrave. not the pale realms of the monarch below; in another world his spirit survives still. Death, if your lore be true, is but the passage to enduring life." § The gods whom the Druid hierarchy worshipped with such ferocious rites, and whose attributes they explained to the youths that flocked to listen to their instructions, were identified by Caisar [! with Mercury, Apollo, Mars, Jupiter, and Minerva. Mercury, he adds, as the inventor of the arts, and the patron of trade and intercommunication, counted the largest number of altars, and the popularity of this god is explained by the flourishing state of traffic and manufactures in Gaul.*: Apollo was supplicated as the * " Annales," xiv., c. 30. t " Provinces,'" i., p. 180. + " Agricola," c. 27. § Matthew Arnold, " Study of Celtic Literature." II "DeBell. Gall.," vi. 17. H Mommsen, "History of Rome," iv., p. 220. 50 CULTURE IN EARLY SCOTLAND. healer of disease. Minerva was especially the patroness of the handicrafts, while in the groves sacred to Mars they piled a portion of the spoil, in gratitude for success in war. Jupiter, as the Father of Heaven, received a homage which the Aryan race, from the plains of India to the Western Isles, offered to the wonders of the sky. Their Celtic names are still recognisable in the Latin inscriptions on the stone tablets, which have been discovered in Gaul and Britain, and which preserve to us the act of piety of some devout or grateful worshipper. Mercury appears in combination with the word Artaius (Welsh a?-, ploughland), Apollo with Maponas (Welsh viapon, boy). Jupiter was known as Taranucus, the Thunderer (Welsh taran, thunder). Mars as Caturix, the battle king (Irish cath, battle, and rix, king), and as Camulos, to whom Camulodunum, the capital of the Trinobantes, and other places were dedicated, and who is recognisable in an inscription to " Mars Camulus," which has been found along the Roman wall between the Forth and the Clyde. Minerva passed among the Britons under the title of Belisama, once the name of the river Ribble.* The investigations, by philologists like Professor Rhys and M. Gaidos, of these votive inscriptions, found in Britain and France, especially in the latter country, have thus tended to confirm the remark of Tacitus that "in both countries the same religious rites, the same superstitions were obserxcd." These are, however, but a few of the principal deities among the innumerable gods that pla}-ed such a role in the thought of our Celtic forefathers. The lively imagination, the vivacious temperament of the Celt, made him particularly susceptible to the influences of nature. The religious instinct, working in the vein of a li\cly fanc\', peopled the land with its aerial creations — the genii to whom the Romans paid homage in every district, in which they formed a station. They saw a divine virtue in the healing properties of springs and herbs, they felt the presence of a god in the brooding mists, the gloomy thickets, the wildfire that flitted across the sky, the mysterious moonbeams, and the glorious sunrays, the will * This subject haslicen examineii by I'rof. Rhys in his " Ilibberi Lectures." See especially lect. i. NATURE AND THE CELTIC FANCY. 57 o' the wisp of the swamps, the mountains, and the plains ; the ever-animated flow of the stream* or the sullen stillness of the pools, the life-giving breath of spring, and the florid beauty of summer. Nature was thus one vast pantheon, and if, before the advent of the Roman, his cult was debased by the horrors of human sacrifice, it was not with- out its poetic charm. It is characterised by an intensity that can only find a resting-place in the conception of the manifold and the vast. Its sentiment presses on to the impalpable, the ideal. The forest of trees and the forest of rocks — something Titanic, something weird as in the Ossianic poems — not hewn timber and carved stones — Stonehenge with its pinnacles of boulder suit its aspirations for .something not to be bounded nor expressed.! At a later time many of these realistic fictions, which wove them- selves into the inmost life and thought of our pagan forefathers, became transformed, in the tale of the bard, into the heroes who filled up the blanks of our earlier history. The old gods vanished before the advance of a more spiritual faith, yet they returned to enjoy, in the pages of Geoffrey of Monmouth and the romances of the Middle Ages, a renewed lease of life, only they were no longer gods, but men — mighty heroes and giants, who assist King Arthur in his combats to maintain the national cause against the pagan Saxon, great leaders like the old solar god, Hugh the mighty, or enchanters like Gwydion, who, with the exquisite and magic charm of the Celtic fancy, transformed the flowers of the oak, of the broom, and the meadow sweet, into a woman. It is a strange fact that some of the mythical saints of the early British Church should be resolvable into pagan gods, and their virtues and miraculous doings prove to be those of the banished deities, transformed by the romancing pen of the monki.sh biographer. St Bran, who, from his fabled conversion at Rome in the first century, and his activity on his return to his native land in preaching the doctrine of the Cross, * "A blind people," says Gildas, referring to the temples and mouldering idols of his time (si.xth century), "paid divine honour to the mountains, wells, and streams." iSee Matthew Arnold, "Study of Celtic Literature," sect. v. 58 CULTURE IN EARLY SCOTLAND. earned the title of the Blessed, turns out to have been originally a war-god. Another great figure of the religious imagination of our Celtic forefathers, the ocean god, Lir, whom Geoffrey gravely reduced to historic shape as the founder of Leicester in the age of the prophet Amos, survived to become, in one of the most powerful of Shake- spearian dramas, the unfortunate King Lear, the tragic victim of filial ingratitude. Bran was in fact one of his divine progeny, and the Lady Brangwaine, the fairest of his daughters, who plays a role in the romance of Tristram and Iseult, was once worshipped, under the title of Branwen of the Fair Bosom, as the Venus of the North. Her miraculous fountain, in an islet off Anglesey, cured the sorrows of unfortunate lovers. Gwydion, the arch-magician, whose castle was in the milky way, was a member of another group of deities — the children of Don — who inhabited the stars and the constellations. But the outstanding figure in that numerous fanciful hierarch}- of our myth-making ancestors, which has been preserved in the legends and romances of a later time, was that of Nodeus or Xudd — the insular Zeus, to whom his votaries appear to have ascribed the roles of a Neptune and Mars combined. A magnificent temple in his honour was erected by the Romans at Lydne}', on the western bank of the Severn. The mosaic floor contains representations of sea-serpents and fishes, the principal figure in a bronze plaque is crowned with ra}-s like Phoebus, and stands in a chariot drawn by four horses, like the Roman Neptune. The typified winds on either side of it. and the site of the temple near the tidal bed of the Severn, are akso in favour of the deity's connection with the ocean, though the inscriptions still in existence indicate that he also enjoyed the honours of Mars. The worship of such a deity — a kind of marine Mars — forms, as Professor Rhys* has remarked, a curious prelude to the histor}- of that com- posite British people, whose merchantmen and men-of-war now cover all the seas. Stonehenge itself is believed to have been one of the numerous scenes of his worship in this country, and a trace of it lingers even yet in the forest of Brccelieu in Brittany. In seasons of great drought the * " Ilibbert Lectures," i. "A LIVING IMAGE OF PAGANISM." 59 inhabitants walk in procession to the fountain of Baranton, led by priests and banner-bearers. On arrival, the rector dips the foot of the cross into the water, the rain must come in consequence within a week's time, and the power of the old god is thus acknowledged, though under a different rubric. " Almost all our superstitions," as M. Renan has well remarked, " are the remains of a religion anterior to Christianity, and which Christianity has not been able entirely to root out. If, at the present day, we wished to recover a living image of paganism, v.'e should have to look for it in some village lying forgotten in the depths of some country district, altogether behind the times."* In Catholic countries, where the ritual of the Church, in which many of the ancient customs of the people were thus absorbed, sur- vived the revolutions wrought in Britain and other parts of Northern Europe by the Reformation, a great deal of the pagan cult has been preserved, though modified by Christian ideas. The missionaries of the Cross were usually more lenient with the religious customs of the pagans, than the Romans had been with the grimmer features of the Druid ceremonial, and while their converts transferred their allegi- ance to Christ and the apostles and the martyrs, they still retained many of their old ideas and practices, under a different name perhaps. Even in our country, which sub- stituted for the Catholic ritual a rigid and inartistic service, many elements of a remote paganism remained bound up wuth the thought and customs of the people. These beliefs and practices of a shadowy past, often on the surface but un- meaning superstitions, have lived on with extraordinary tenacity for many centuries, and it would be well, in view of such a fact, if those who are inclined to hold, with unreasoning bigotry, traditional beliefs in religion would pause to inquire into the origin of many a dogma or shibboleth, even though it pass under the title of Christian, and seem a pillar of the Christian s\'stem. The popular belief in witchcraft, which cast its dark shadow over so many innocent lives in mediaeval and even in modern times, was simply a survival from pre-christian ages. I remember hearing of a case in Banffshire less than twenty years ago, * " Influence of the Institutions, Thought, and Culture of Rome," p. 32. 6o CULTURE IN EARLY SCOTLAND. in which an otherwise shrewd man seriously accused a neighbour of having bewitched his cow, by drawing off the milk, and causing it to flow into a pitcher from the end of his table. The idea that the witches could raise storms by certain spells, that their charms were proof against weapons, that they held their meetings on wild heath or dark mountain top, and could ride through the air or transport themselves into cats, hares, or were-wolves, that they could cause disease by demoniacal powers, and convey thorns, pins, &c., into their victims' bodies — this was essentially a pagan idea and a pagan practice.* The same origin is to be assigned to the sacrifice of a cock for the cure of epilepsy, the leaving of a rag, as an offering, on a bush beside a well, which for ages has had the repute of being able to afford recovery from disease, the refraining from killing fish in some loch or pool, the curtseying to the new moon or the greeting that is offered her by young women in the High- lands from the earthfast stone, in order to discover their future husbands, the fear of the water-kelpie — the aquatic bull or horse whose appearance brings death and calamity, — the worship of fire represented by the bonfires of Hallowe'en, the sacrifice of a bull to some saint such as St Mouri at Applecross, or St Cuthbert at Kirkcudbright. In " Hallow- e'en," with its pawky talc of all the simple artifices to which the Ayrshire rustic resorts, in the endeavour to discover his or her future mate in life. Burns has unconsciously left us a succinct text-book of the ancient paganism of the countryside. The question as to the influence of religious belief and ritual on the lives and character of a people is an interest- ing and important one from the standpoint of culture. The religion of our Celtic ancestors of remote pagan times was not merely a system of m\-tholog)- and philosophy, whose mysteries were the exclusive property of the priestly caste and studiously kept from the um"nitiated, being committed to memory, not written down, by the numerous disciples who crowded the sacred groves. That it also exercised a great influence on the people, we may gather from the power of the sacred order. Their word was law, and dis- * See Tylor, " Primitive Culture," p. 13S. MORAL INFLUENCE OF PRIEST AND CREED. 6 1 obedience to it was followed b}' a sentence of excommuni- cation more fearful than death itself* They were the arbiters of all public disputes, which in Gaul were submitted to the Druidic assembly held once a year at Chartres. They decided the question of peace or war. They enjoyed the most ample privileges, and were, in fact, the ruling class in the nation. In such circumstances, their doctrines and their rites were not the formal s}'stem that the national religion had become to the philosophers of Greece and Rome. The reverence for the gods, and the submission to the authorit}- of their fierce and fanatic ministers, were intense realities to those whose minds were so impressed b}' the idea of the supernatural that, while impatient of kingh^ control,! they submissively endured the grimmest form of priestly tyranny. Such a religion must, notwithstanding the risk of being a dead mechanical weight, have exercised a certain moral power in the various relations of life. The time has passed when the champion of the Christian faith summarily limited all excellence, on dogmatic grounds, to Christianity, and proscribed every other faith by the name of pagan. Wallace, who spent several years among savage tribes, came to the conclusion that the savage is after all in man}' respects a better man than the Christian, and the same sentiment has been beautifully expressed b}- the poet Saume. The ethic philosophy of the Druids ma}- excite a smile, but in the more civilised communities we find the idea of the family and the existence of marriage. Among the Aryan race the relations of the sexes were not of the degraded kind that prevail among peoples at a low stage of civilisation. In the household the wife was not the mere slave of the husband, but bore a part in the government of the family, and there are not wanting examples in Britain of women wielding the supreme power in the State. :|: Cartismandua or Boudicca would not have held such a position had their sex been the degraded slave of the men. True, Cffisar has recorded a report that the natives of the * Cresar, " De Bell. Gall.," vi., c. 13. + IHd., V. 6 ; cf. V. 27. X Tacitus, "Agricola," c. xvi. " In Britain there is no rule of distinction to exclude the female line from the throne, or the command of armies." 62 CULTURE IN EARLY SCOTLAND. interior of the island lived in what we should regard as a state of communal marriage — the state in which the women are the common property of the communitx', and which has been found to be the case in modern times among peoples like the Bushmen of South Africa, the inhabitants of Queen Charlotte Island, and the natives of Australia. While we should not be surprised at such a brutal practice among peoples whose culture is that of the savage, we can hardly believe that the shocking moral laxity, which Caesar had heard prevailed among the inland British tribes, was any- thing more than one of these incredible fictions, that were credited to the little known and much scandalised regions beyond the pale of Roman dominion. " Ten or a dozen men have their wives in common ; brothers with brothers and parents with their sons, but the children are accounted those of the man to whom the woman was first assigned."* This condition of things would not necessarily mark a low state of culture, as appears from the fact that Plato advo- cated a community of wives, chiefly on the patriotic ground that the children would be attached more closely to their countr)-. But if not a pure fiction, the statement may be merely an ignorant, though not wilful, caricature of the patriarchal community in which the sons of one father lived together with their wives and children, in subjection to their paternal head. This custom was not unknown among the Aryan nations in early times, and the clan system in Ire- land and the Highlands remained a late and elaborate survival of this phase of social development. But it looks so like one of those tit-bits in the fabulous stories told by Hecatsus and other Greek romancers, that we are inclined to believe rather that the usually shrewd historian was for once caught napping, especially as he does not in this instance relate what he had observed himself It is at all events quite worthy of a place beside the tales recorded by Strabo (who, however, doubts them), Dion Cassius, Solinus, and even St Jerome, about the la.x relations of the sexes in Ireland, Thule, and the Hebrides, but though the picture of a grass-eating community, who had no idea of marriage, or of a king, who allowed his passions unrestrained scope * "De Bell. Gall.," v. 14. FABLE AND FACT. 63 among his female subjects, might amuse the languid Greek in quest of novelties, and pass for fact in the learned pages of Blackstone, such tales have not been able to survive the keenness of modern research. The pen of Tacitus has drawn a very different picture of the moral vigour of the opponents of Agricola, and the speech which he puts into the mouth of Galgacus contains not a few favourable com- parisons between the martial, freedom-loving barbarians, and the oppre.ssive and demoralising character of the Roman civilisation. We may assume that, though the speech is the production of the writer, he would not have written one pal- pably out of keeping with the character of the barbarian chief and his followers. And certainly the Caledonian orator, with Tacitus for so^/J/Zcin', has no cause to be ashamed of himself and his people in the presence of the legions of Rome. There is not merely the fierce declamation of the barbarian to whom battle and carnage are a delight; there is the glow of a generous enthusiasm in the cause of freedom, home, and native land, coupled with a courage, a feeling of human rights, a contempt of death, that contrast widely with the moral delinquincies ascribed by the orator to the Romans — their insolent pride, their avarice, their ambition, their brutal tyranny and cruelty. Galgacus does not talk like a man who had no idea of the sacredness of the domestic life, and an historian like Tacitus would not for the sake of mere effective writing have penned an oration, glowing with appreciation of the noblest virtues, without regard in some degree for the fitness of things. BOOK II ROMAN CULTURE CHAPTER I. THE PLASTIC TOUCH OF ROME. NO observant Scotsman, with an interest in the antiquarian remains of his country, is unfamiHar with some venerable monument of the presence of the Roman invader in Northern Britain. He may, in the same breath, grow eloquent over the heroism that vindicated his country's independence at Bannockburn, and that per- sistently resisted the renewed attempts to conquer it by the most martial people of antiquity, but he cannot contemplate those numerous traces of imperial grandeur, scattered over the surface of his native land, without a feeling of interest, and even of reverence. They suggest the thought — not without a strong fascination for those who feel a keen sympathy with the great deeds and the great figures of antiquity — that Scotland formed a part of the mightiest empire of ancient, as it does of that of modern times. There is at least this bond of likeness between our present and our past, and the remembrance of it may well quicken our interest in the marvellous power which has so long lain prostrate beneath the vanished centuries, as well as beget a sentiment of wonder at the strange revolutions of human history. To-day we boast that the sun never sets on the Queen's dominions. Our romanised forefathers spoke in a similar strain, for the Romans, too, had their pride of empire, and their poets could sing that " the earth is girdled with a Roman ocean." Although the territories E 66 CULTURE IN EARLY SCOTLAND. that owned the sway of the Roman emperors cannot be compared in extent with the giant vastness of Greater Britain, the boast of the poets was not an empty one. They embraced large possessions in three continents, and from the Euphrates to the Danube, from the north of Africa to the north of Britain, the valour of the Roman legions, and the spirit of Roman institutions, had welded peoples of many tongues and of great diversity of race into one gigantic organism, as the army and the enterprise of Britain has done, on a still grander scale, in every quarter of the modern world. To the far-seeing policy of Gracchus, the Romans owed the idea of opening up in the north-west a field for the activity of Italian merchants and the super- fluous population of Italian cities. The military genius of Caesar succeeded at length in realising the project of the Great Tribune. The same conditions, which have led to the establishment of the British colonies, existed in the Italy of Virgil and Horace as well as in the Athens of Pericles, and, along with the same instinct of conquest, led to the absorp- tion of the verdant and fertile regions of Gaul, whose inhabitants were compelled to surrender their independence before the superlative organisation, the more enterprising spirit of their neighbours south of the Alps. In order to the consolidation of their richly remunerative possessions between the Rhine and the Atlantic, the Roman generals could not leave the adjacent island of Britain out of account, connected as it was by trade and race sympathies with Gaul, and affording a basis for the disturbing influence of deserters and rebels. It is to this policy of expansion towards the north-west, carried out with such iron energy by Cnesar in Gaul, and a succession of distinguished generals in Britain, that we are indebted for the abiding impress of Roman culture, which survixcd the wreck of Roman political organisation in the beginning of the fifth century, and which has left its trace so deej^K' in the life of the western peoples. The advance of the Romans to the forests of Caledonia, leavening in its course the barbarian Celts -with the culture of ItaK", is an e\ent of world-historic importance. If the conquest of Gaul had not been achieved by Ca.'sar, and the northern barbarians, unrestrained by the THE RELATION OF BRITAIN TO ROME. 6/ barrier of the Roman power on the left bank of the Rhine, had poured across that river and over the Alps and the Pyrenees, the Helleno-Latin culture could not have per- petuated itself as it has done in the thought and institutions of the north, and transformed its barbarian life. It would have been to us to-day rather like that of Persia and India, largely external, and would have exercised, comparatively speaking, but a meagre influence on our development.* The relation in which Britain stood to the great empire of which it was an integral part, was a very close one. It was not that merely of a conquered province, connected with the seat of power mainly by means of the tax-gatherer, and the foreign trader, whose only interest in the new acquisition was that of gain. That it was so to some extent, and suffered in consequence, is only too truCjf as we shall see. But it was, all the same, a colony in the organic sense, as much permeated by the life that pulsed from the heart of the empire as Australia, or Canada, or Cape Colony are by the spirit and institutions of Britannia at the present time. To its shores came not merely the Roman legions to conquer and enslave its warlike tribes, or the Roman merchant to exchange the more luxurious products of the south for the native minerals, pearls, and furs ; there came also the Roman colonist to settle on its fertile plains and till its soil, to found considerable cities whose inhabitants enjoyed the rights and privileges of Roman citizens, and in which the refinements, the laws, the culture of Italy, flourished as under their softer native sky. The camp, in fact, was frequently but the forerunner of the colon)^ and the eisrantic ruins of some of the Roman cities, such as Caerleon, Chester, and Luguballium (Carlisle), as well as the speedy subjection of the southern portion of the island, tell, with convincing emphasis, of the vigour with which the invaders transformed their remote island acquisition by the civilisation of the south. In the short interval between the second invasion under Claudius, and the desperate attempt of the Britons to throw off the hated alien yoke in the reign of Nero, under the Icenian Queen, Boadicea or * See Mommsen, " History of Rome," iv. 287, 2SS (Dickson's translation), t Tacitus, " Agricola,'' c. 19. 6S CULTURE IN EARLY SCOTLAND. Boudicca, a considerable number of Roman settlements had been effected, so that the 70,000 victims of native vengeance could be spoken of as " citizens or allies of Rome."* The policy of Trajan with reference to Dacia, whither in the words of Eutropius, " he transferred from the whole Roman world great masses of colonists to till the soil and build cities," was merely an instance of what must have happened in Britain under a Claudius, a Hadrian, an Antoninus, a Severus, a Constantine, or any of the other emperors who evinced a special interest in the most northerly province of the empire. The fact that many of the well-known names of the Roman nobility are found inscribed on the boundary stones of the estates of these Roman colonists! indicates the existence of a numerous class of Roman landowners, whose occupation of the more fertile tracts in which the Roman colonies settled served to bring their British dependants into contact with the culture of Italy. To this organic and moulding connection with the motherland must be added the solidarity with every part of the dominions of the Caesars, which it derived from the presence of bands of settlers, of nearly every nationality embraced within their pale. The Roman army was as heterogeneous in point of race as our own, and the policy of garrisoning the military posts of the empire with soldiers from remote countries, brought to our shores men of almost every clime and language from Lebanon to Mount Atlas. Just as we find companies of British troops settled in Gaul, Spain, Italy, Illyricum, Egypt, Armenia, so the stations along the walls of Hadrian and Antoninus were occupied by detachments of Spaniards, Gauls, Moors, Germans, Thracians, Dacians, &c. I In some cases, indeed, the foreign settlers consisted of the whole population of a district, which was taught to maintain in exile the allegiance, so uncertain in its native haunt. Britain, wc ma\- .sa\-, repro- duced the culture of Ital>-, with the cosmopolitanism of the * Tacitus, xiv. 33. t This subject has been exhaustively treated l)y Mr Coote. in his " Romans of Britain," an author who, whatever his exaggerations as the apologist of the Roman n%'-i//ie in Britain, is fertile in ingenious arguments. t This is indicated by the " Noiitia Imperii," and confirmed by the numerous inscriptions fovmd around the ruins of these great works. FROM BEN LOMOND TO ^rOU^"T ATLAS. 69 empire in its widest range. The lowlands of Scotland, as embraced within the province, shared with what is now England in the benefits of this cosmopolitan Roman culture, though less consecutively and less thoroughly, owing to the oft-recurring disturbing influences of the British inroads. The Romans were not only a people of action ; they were likewise a people of method. They understood the art of government as well as of war. They organised the various provinces of their vast empire with machine-like precision, and although their healthy development was ultimateh', in the decay of the empire, cramped and withered by the fetters of an effete bureaucracy,* the estab- lishment of a strong and central government, in place of that of the petty and quarrelsome clan chieftain or the success- ful usurper, was at first a highly beneficial revolution, and lent an impulse to the development of the conquered terri- tory. Instead of being harassed by the constant quarrels and feuds of rival tribes, Britain south of the Forth enjoyed for three centuries the benefits of an orderly government, strong in the repression of internal disorder, even to the danger of being despotic in its rigour, and oppressive in its exactions. After the time of Constantine, it formed part of the vast prefecture of the west, extending from Ben Lomond to Mount Atlas. Although the several districts, into which the island was divided for the purposes of civil and military administration, were placed under separate officers, subject to a deputy-governor or vicar, the whole were under the Prefect of Gaul, whose residence was at Treves. The province was thus knitted in the strictest possible political union to the mighty fabric of Roman dominion in the west. Neither its isolation nor its remoteness could, under such a magnetic system, retard its march at equal pace with the rest of the empire ; and this intimate political union, which placed it as it were on the border of Italy itself, and involved it in intimate associa- tion with the various movements of the time, derived all the more practical influence through the elaborate system of communication which prevailed in every part of the empire. With the Roman legion came the Roman engi- * Guizot, " Histoire de la Civilisation en france," i., p. 51. yO CULTURE IN EARLY SCOTLAND. neer, and the natives of a conquered territory had cause to complain, not onl}' of the loss of independence, but of the forced labour, which they were compelled to lend towards the construction of roads and bridges.* Wherever we find the trace of the Roman camp, we may look for the track of the Roman road. From the Forth to the Straits of Dover, and from Boulogne to the Eternal Cit\', the mer- chants, the couriers, the troops, the official functionaries, the tourists, the philosophers from the imperial capital, could find a serviceable road, and c\'en vary their journey by a choice of route. The care of these highways was entrusted to a surveyor or curator viarnin, who enjoyed a high rank, and no expense was spared to keep them in repair, and provide for the wants of travellers. Post horses were kept in readiness at stated intervals, and the roadside inn afforded a welcome lodging, a grateful rest from the fatigue of the journey. Money and a passport were the onl}- requisites for the traveller from end to end of Roman Europe, as they still are in the Europe of to-day. Though slower, and much more toilsome, the means of communication were almost as complete as in our age of rapid railway and steamboat travelling. The life of Hilarion displays the facility with which an indigent hermit of Palestine might traverse Egypt, embark for Sicily, escape to Epirus, and finally settle in the island of C\-prus.t The ea.sy transition of the legions on the Forth or the Tyne to the Danube or the Euphrates, and the rapid journey of Constantinc from Asia to join his imperial father at York, afford additional evidence of the services that could be rendered by these might)' factors in the spread of Roman culture to every part of the Roman world. Even beyond the frontier of the empire, amid the forests and mountains of Caledonia, the pulse of life and events in the mighty city on the Tiber was not imperceptible. The quickly flying rumour of the accession of an emperor was frequently made the occasion of a raid into the Romanised regions south of the Forth. • Tacitus, " Agricola," c. 31, wliere the Caleiloni.in chief Galgacus makes it a source of hitter complaint that " our bodies are woiii out in clearing woods and marshes." t Gibbon, " Decline and l-'all,'" vi., p. 233 (ed. Milman). ROMAN COLONISATION. 7I The transformation effected by this close contact of a highly civilised people with the barbarians, whom they conquered, resembled in man}' respects that accomplished in Africa, Australia, and America by the colonising nations of modern Europe. There was not the same marvellously quick development of our time, because the same mechanical conditions of rapid progress did not exist then. But the conquered territory showed on all hands the stamp of Roman culture and Roman energy. A system of well- made and carefully maintained highways took the place of the ancient paths in Britain. Bridges spanned the rivers, and harbours were constructed at their outlets. Traces of busy seaports, for instance, have been inferred near the modern Cramond and Cameleon on the Forth, and at Dumbarton on the Clyde. The mining operations * carried on in Northumberland, Wales, and the Midlands show that the Romans valued the mineral wealth of the island, and knew how to turn it to account. Then, as now in our colonial possessions, the land was surveyed and distributed — not always with regard for native rights — and portions of the thick forest were cleared to make way for the plough of the colonist. The arts, the industries, the refinements of a highly civilised life, flourished in cities like York and London, Lincoln and Gloucester, St Albans and Carlisle, with their temples and basilicas, baths and public monu- ments, aqueducts and sewage works, busy market-places and elegant suburbs.! In the country the landowner, who filled his coffers with the fruit of slave labour, adorned his villa with all the elegance of Italy. The large proportions of many of these in the fertile districts of the south, their marble halls, tesselated floors, tasteful frescos, classic statuary, graceful potter)^ extensive lawns and gardens, might have rivalled the noble mansions of the wealthy and aristocratic classes of our own time. As early as the age of xAgricolaJ a great impulse was given to the erec- * "Britain," says Tacitus, "contains, to reward the conqueror, mines of gold and silver, and other metals " (" Agricola," c. 12). t Gildas ('• Hist.," sect. 3) describes in a strain of admiration the twenty- eight embattled and embellished cities of Britain. Cf. Breda, " Ecc. Hist.," i., c. II. X Tacitus, "Agricola," c. 21. 72 CULTURE IN EARLY SCOTLAND. tion of magnificent buildings, by the policy of this wise governor of weaning the natives to the refinements of Roman civilisation by the building of temples, basilicas, villas, baths, and porticos. In the north, where the remains of the Roman occupa- tion are largely of a military character, colonisation was neither so highly luxurious, nor on so extensive a scale as in the thickly populated south, where " the painful and dangerous transition from independence to foreign rule" was comparatively rapid. The portion of Scotland which came under the direct influence of the Romans — the Valen- tia of later emperors — was essentially a frontier territory. The resolute and systematic attempt of Agricola had prac- tically resulted in quelling the resistance of the fierce High- landers, but the recall of the conqueror afforded them time to recover from the crushing defeat inflicted on them at Mons Grampius ; and singular though it appear, consider- ing the superiority and resources of the Roman armies, they subsequently remained unsubdued and defiant be- hind their rugged mountains. The Roman frontier never advanced beyond the chain of forts erected by Agricola between the Forth and the Cl}'de. The fact that Hadrian found it necessary to construct a second strong line of defence, consisting of the stone wall and earthen rampart,* whose track may still be followed over the hilly region between the Tyne and the Solwaj' is an indication that the campaigns of Agricola in Scotland, so graphically described by his son-in-law Tacitus, had been without permanent effect in the subjugation of its warlike and independent spirited tribes. Even after Lollius Urbicus t had recovered the abandoned tcrritor}', in the reign of .Antoninus Pius, and secured it by the erection of an earthen wall,;): with * See Collingwood Bruce, " The Roman W.ill."' + This inform.ition we owe to Capiiolimis, and it is confirmed by the discovery of a stone ]:)laced by the 2nd legion Augusta. :!: Graham's Dyl