PLAYS BY JACINTO BENAVENTE JACINTO BENAVENTE TRANSLATED FROM THE SPANISH WITH AN INTRODUCTION BY JOHN GARRETT UNDERBILL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE SOCIEDAD DE AUTORES E8PANOLE3 IN THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA I ^AtfT^OlllZEE Ei>I?iON NEW YORK CHARLES SCRIBNER'S SONS 1921 312 ^ COPYRIGHT, 1917, BY JOHN GARRETT UNDERBILL Published May, 1917 C o p - ' CONTENTS PAGB INTRODUCTION vii His WIDOW'S HUSBAND- 1 THE BONDS OF INTEREST 37 THE EVIL DOERS OF GOOD 113 LA MALQUERIDA 197 INTRODUCTION i JACINTO BENAVENTE was born at Madrid, August 12, 1866^. { He was the son of Mariano Benavente, a physician and dis- tinguished specialist in the diseases of children, who had come up to the capital from Murcia, that most African and somnolent of European cities, some years before. If Adam should return to this earth, says the Spaniard, Murcia is the spot he would recognize first, for of all places it has changed the least. There is in many of the' most fascinating pages of Benavente the sense of this semitropical, parched, unchang- ing landscape, where, as he himself has put it, civilization has not yet murdered sleep. Along the upper reaches of the River Segura lies many a town, baked into the arid hillsides through centuries of torrid noons, from which never a name has come forth into the currents of European life. As a young man he entered the University of Madrid and there studied law, without, however, completing the course. But no routine study fixed his attention. Injparticular, he was avid of intercourse with persons of all sorts and condi- tions, especially with those whose lives were uncouth and primitive in their surroundings, and who were simple and childlike in nature, where the heart was never very far be- neath the surface and the emotions ingenuous and strong. For a while he travelled with a circus; it is even said that he performed in the ring. Clowns fascinated him. dkll classes of itinerant folk have been his friends ever since. Subse- quently he became an actor, appearing in the company of viii INTRODUCTION Maria Tubau, where his first part was that of a sportsman, at that period an exotic, incredible, not to say highly ridicu- lous figure in Spain. Hejhas_always been a peregrin.-. ;t< determined by the con- dition of the individual and his relation to his environment. The suggestion of this conflict is always present in Bena- vente, in terms of feeling and the heart. It prevents his most acrid satire from becoming artificial. As his plays un- fold, slowly, imperceptibly it wells up in them where, we can scarcely say, nor how until at last we find ourselves afloat upon the drama of human experience, of which the author seems not until then to have been conscious, and whose development he has had no part in determining. The effect of some of the plays is optimistic, of others pessimistic, according to the degree in which the conditions of life they present are susceptible of domination or are immutably cruel. In "The Bonds of Interest," presented at the same theatre two years later, this satire is directed against the duality of human nature itself. The comedy is so deft and facile thai it is easy to pass its significance by. Every man has within him two irreconcilable selves, the good and the bad, the generous, the sordid and base. We are not now a Jekyll and now a Hyde, as in Stevenson's story, but the good is inextricably mixed with the bad, which serves or dominates INTRODUCTION xk it as the case may be. No man is so disinterested that he \ x is insensible to the practical implications of his conduct. And with the worst there always goes some little of the best, so that no one may be said truly to know himself, nor what,, he is. In the play, Leander typifies the untutored best in man, which is good intention. He is unsullied by a life of hardship and defeat, of flight from a heartless justice, of cheats and deceptions and lies. Crispin is the slave, the servant a role which he assumes voluntarily. All service that is worthy of the name is in some measure disinterested. Those who do the work of life must face the facts of life. If Crispin does this, if he does not lie to himself, however much he may lie to others, he will learn through observation and be taught by his own labor. In the end he changes places with Leander, the man of good intentions, who drifts upon the fortunes of others, for out of experience springs the knowledge of the true values of life, which is redeemed only by disinterested love, which is always service and sacrifice. With this the farce ends. Spanish criticism has hesitated to define the personality of Benavente or to attempt any final generalization of his work. A product of eighty plays in little more than twenty years might well give the critic pause. But at a distance of three thousand miles, with the perspective of another litera- ture, another stage, it ought not to be difficult to form some conception of this output in its totality as well as of its sig- nificance and tendencies. From the days of the Goncourts and Henri Becque in France, the modern movement has been one of cults, of the ardors of the pioneer. It is the story of the rise of the free theatres, of new techniques passionately espoused, of reform. Yet to this writer art was a career, not a campaign. Strange xx INTRODUCTION to say, in a land of warm, soft, southern sun, he has been infected to a less degree than any of his predecessors with a desire to hurry his work upon the stage. His temper, per- haps, is more akin to D'Annunzio's than to that of any other writer of equal rank, although it is devoid of that absorption in the picturesque for its own sake, in himself, in the colorful romance of the past as a pageant, which is so conspicuous in the Italian. Adolfo Bonillu y San .Martin, the critic, has considered the development of his theatre from the literary point of view with authority, but the most penetrating and satisfying analysis of his personality has been made by Gregorio Martinez Sierra, himself a dramatist and scholar of cosmopolitan attainments, intimately associated with him professionally and as a man of letters throughout a period of many years. The portrait which he has drawn is both striking and definitive. "Benavente does not compose," says Martinez Sierra, "he creates. The impelling force in his work comes wholly from within, and proceeds from the inside out, as a seed germi- nates, or perhaps more properly, as a crystal takes form. Naturally, good seed which has fallen on good ground pro- duces good fruit, harmonious in development, luxuriant in bloom. There are in consequence, upon occasion, amazing achievements of technique in the total output of this great artist, but I will take my oath that, while writing, he has never for a single second concerned himself with these, nor sought to contrive an effect for a curtain, nor a situation in the course of an act. Is it urged, then, that he has chanced upon many? Beyond all question. As it is written: 'But seek ye first the Kingdom of God and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you.' "I should say that the varied qualities which, when fused, constitute his genius, are susceptible of almost any adapta- INTRODUCTION xxi tion. What are they? First of all, astounding jclearn ess j)f mind. Few persons understand so quickly or so well as Jacinto Benavente. It might be said that he jumps from the first point to the conclusion without any intermediate process. To talk with him is the greatest possible rest to the mind. He needs no proof. He comprehends at a glance, without the necessity of waiting for the completed word to reach his ear. He sees ideas coming, and it is the same with events; he sees persons as well. This is why nothing astonishes him. If sometimes the course of events has been such as to give him pain, as must befall all of us who make this journey through life, I am confident that at least he has never been surprised. Hence his readiness at repartee, his irony; hence what has been called his 'detach- ment,' the oscillations of the moral sense backward and forward through his works. He understands everything^. and while possibly he does not excuse it, he concedes it by virtue of the mere fact that it exists, a right to existence. Of what use to deny, since what is must be?" /* Chronologically and spiritually, Benavente is the last of the moderns. Born a few years later than the writers whose names have hitherto been most illustrious in the modern theatre, he has been familiar with them all. He has had the advantage of a perspective which has permitted him to profit by their labors. When he began to write naturalism had al- ready had its day and done its work; thenceforth its results might safely be assumed. It was no longer necessary to set them down in unending pages of detail. The theatric situation, which Ibsen had undertaken to rationalize, had already come into disfavor. Time was ripe for a new syn- thesis, for an inquiry into t^.e inherent nature and necessity of those expedients which had, time out of mind, been ac- cepted as mandatory upon the stage, whereby the writing xxii INTRODUCTION of dramas had come to be regarded as a business of purvey- ing carefully elaborated shocks and surprises to auditors who had been prepared for their reception. But of course drama is nothing like this. It is not constrained to leap from situ- ation to situation; nor will it suffice to rationalize the the- atric; it must be gotten rid of altogether. In its very con- ception it is a blight. If a play does not express itself in terms of interest, then it is imperfectly conceived, or unin- teresting dramatically. It is useless to call in the stage doctor or to attempt to stimulate vitality by a resort to stage patent medicines. Similarly by their nature partisan- ship and propaganda are alien to so knowing and catholic a mind. Benavente is the most sophisticate*! of writers, and his characters and conceptions are introduced so un- obtrusively into the minds of his readers that they seem al- ways to have existed in them, and are welcomed as old friends. To understand, it is necessary first to feel we must sym- pathize and it is this feeling which, when rationalized, is productive of great art. He has expounded his theory in one of his prefaces. Great art must not only be original, it must be tolerant and sincere qualities postulated in its breadth of view. "The function of the artist is to tranquillize emo- tion through the intelligence, and it is only in so far as he is able to do this that his work becomes good art; his aim is to bring serenity, not to create a tempest in the mind. . . . Every artist in communicating emotion, is under obligation to set down not what he imagines may move us, but what has in fact moved him. The true artist will fly from literary convention as infallibly as the true lover from the 'Lovers' Letter Writer,' which lies ready to his aid. Good actors know that the right gesture suggests the appropriate feel- . drama of character, never of character in its superficial aspects, its eccentricities, but in the human motives which \ ^ a " >^ underlie and determine its individual manifestations, without /^ which it would be otherwise or cease to be. This is the source f both of his unity and his complexity, which partake of the ' multifariousness of the modern world. Benavente is not only an artist, he is much more; he is a i master of life, of those human crises which arise amid the \ * preoccupations of a complex society, when poverty, passion, or some other elemental force breaks for the moment through the dead tangle of convention. His drama is social, not \ INTRODUCTION anti-social. It is not a glorification of heroes and villains and supermen, impatient to enforce their desires, nor is it concerned with revolt or reform, except in a purely secondary sense. The attitude of personal protest is in reality not modern, but reactionary somewhat naive an echo of the old fanaticism. Of course, there is much in society that is susceptible of immediate reformation. Courage and reso- lution can work wonders. But there is much more in the world as it exists about us which is fixed, at least within the span of man's days, which we must first recognize, then submit to or ignore. The subject of Jacinto Benavente is the struggle of love against poverty, of obligation against desire, of imputed virtue against the consciousness of sin. His point of attack is where the individual and the social problem join. Upon these frontiers of the social life which are also frontiers of the moral life he is completely at home, in those fateful moments when society touches the individual to the quick, and he ceases to be his conventional self, and becomes for a brief space a free agent to make the decision which sets in motion again the wheels of the social organism which is to crush him or to carry him along. In its structure and apparatus, society is the study of the sociologist rather than the preoccupation of the artist, yet it is always pres- ent in his drama as a background, as a silent partner, per- haps, or as a relentless opposing force. These are par excel- lence social dramas, in a word, of man in society, yet whose action is conceived never for its effect upon society, but al- ways in its meaning and implication in the life of man. By a curious yet not arbitrary contradiction, in his court comedies he has expressed himself most unmistakably. No one has excelled him in the depiction of the elegance and sophistication of what is still known as royalty, its perfect breeding in the sphere to which it extends, the shadowy INTRODUCTION xxv unreality and irony of it all, daily becoming more manifest, while underneath there often lies an artless, childlike heart, masked by generations of veneer. The artificiality of the surroundings contrasts vividly with the simple directness and humanity of the theme, and throws liis qualities into the highest relief. Only__an aristocrat, says Benavente,, can be a democrat. Such a luxury is not for the poor. In the beautiful comedy, "The School of Princesses," Prince Albert sums up his point of view. "My philosophy is very simple to accept my position in life with all its obli- gations, to realize that only by fulfilling them completely, that is, of my own free will, can I be happy; that in this way, and this way only, can we, in our unreal station, become the equals of other men who have not been born princes. You must not think that this has cost me no trouble. The gov- ernment of oneself is a most difficult matter, but when once it is achieved, what splendid liberty ! The day that each of us becomes a tyrant over himself, that day all men witt become free, without revolutions and without laws." HIS WIDOW'S HUSBAND COMEDY IN ONE ACT FIRST PRESENTED AT THE TEATRO PRINCIPE ALFONSO, MADRID, ON THE EVENING OF THE NINETEENTH or OCTOBER, 1908 CHARACTERS CAROLINA EUDOSIA PAQUITA FLORENCIO CASALONGA ZURITA VALDIVIESO The scene is laid in a provincial capital HIS WIDOW'S HUSBAND CAROLINA is seated as ZURITA enters. ZURITA. My friend ! CAROLINA. My good Zurita, it is so thoughtful of you to come so promptly ! I shall never be able to repay all your kindness. ZURITA. I am always delighted to be of service to a friend. CAROLINA. I asked them to look for you everywhere. Par- don the inconvenience, but the emergency was extreme. I am in a terrible position; all the tact in the world can never extricate me from one of those embarrassing predicaments unless you assist me by your advice. ZURITA. Count upon my advice; count upon me in any- thing. However, I cannot believe that you are really in an embarrassing predicament. CAROLINA. But I am, my friend; and you are the only one who can advise me. You are a person of taste; your articles and society column are the standard of good form with us. Everybody accepts and respects your decisions. ZURITA. Not invariably, I am sorry to say especially now that I have taken up the suppression of the hips, which are fatal to the success of any toilette. Society was formerly very select in this city, but it is no longer the same, as you no doubt have occasion to know. Too many fortunes have been improvised, too many aristocratic families have de- scended in the scale. There has been a great change in so- ciety. The parvenus dominate and money is so insolent ! lVopte~whb haVe4t-imgine that other things can be impro- 3 4 HIS WIDOW'S HUSBAND vised as education, for example, manners, good taste. Surely you must realize that such things cannot be impro- vised. Distinction is a hothouse plant. We grow too few gardenias nowadays like you, my friend. On the other hand, we have an abundance of sow-thistles. Not that I am referring to the Nunez family. . . . How do you sup- pose those ladies enliven their Wednesday evenings? With a gramophone, my friend, with a gramophone just like any vulgar cafe; although I must confess that it is an im- provement upon the days when the youngest sang, the middle one recited, and all played together. Nevertheless it is horrible. You can imagine my distress. CAROLINA. You know, of course, that I never take part in then* Wednesdays. I never call unless I am sure they are not at home. ZURITA. But that is no longer a protection; they leave the gramophone. And the maid invites you to wait and entertain yourself with the Mochuelo. What is a man to do?_ It is impossible to resent the records upon the maid. 'But we are wandering from the subject. You excite my curiosity. CAROLINA. You know that to-morrow is the day of the unveiling of the statue of my husband, of my previous hus- band ZURITA. A fitting honor to the memory of that great, that illustrious man. This province owes him much, and so does all Spain. We who enjoyed the privilege of. calling our- selves his friends, should be delighted to see justice done to his deserts at last, here where political jealousies and intrigue have always belittled the achievements of our eminent men. But Don Patricio Molinete could have no enemies. To-morrow will atone for much of the pettiness of the past. HIS WIDOW'S HUSBAND 5 CAROLINA. No doubt. I feel I ought to be proud and happy, although you understand the delicacy of my posi- tion. Now that I have married again, my name is not the same. Yet it is impossible to ignore the fact that once it was mine, especially as everybody knows that we were a model couple. I might perhaps have avoided the situation by leaving town for a few days on account of my health, but then that might have been misinterpreted. People might have thought that I was displeased, or that I declined to participate. ZITRITA. Assuredly. Although your name is no longer the same, owing to circumstances, the force of which we appreciate, that is no reason why you should be deprived of the honor of having borne it worthily at the' time. Your present husband has no right to take offense. CAROLINA. No, poor Florencio ! In fact, he was the first to realize that I ought to take a leading part in the rejoicing. Poor Florencio was always poor Patricio's . greatest admirer. Their political ideas were the same; they agreed in every- thing. ZURITA. Apparently. CAROLINA. As I have reason to know. Poor Patricio loved me dearly; perhaps that was what led poor Florencio to imagine that there was something in me to justify the affection of that great-hearted and. intelligent man. It" was " enough for me to know that Florencio was Patricio's most intimate friend in order to form my opinion of him.- Of course, I recognize that Florencio's gifts will never enable him to shine so brilliantly, but that is not to say that he is wanting in ability. He lacks ambition, that is all. All his desires are satisfied at home with me, at his own fireside. And I am as well pleased to have it *o. I nm not ambitious myself. The seasons which I spent with my husband in 6 HIS WIDOW'S HUSBAND Madrid were a source of great uneasinS^t6 me. I passed -the week during which he wa*-Mmister of Agriculture in 'one continual state jjf attfhety. Twice he nearly had a duel over some political ^uestion,. I did not know which way to turn, if he hud ever become Prime Minister, as was actually predicted by a newspaper which he controlled, I should have been obliged to take to my bed for the week. ZUKITA. You are not like our senator's wife, Senora Espinosa, nor the wife of our present mayor. They will never rest, nor allow others to && so, until they see their husbands erected in marble. CAROLINA. Dfr you think that either Espinosa or the mayor are of a caliber ta^deserve statues? ZURITA. Not publicly, perhaps. In a private chapel, in the class of martyrs and husbands^ it might not be in- appropriate. But I am growing impatient. CAROLINA. As you say, friend Zurita, it might seem marked for me to leave the city. Yet if I remain I must at- tend the unveiling of the monument to my poor Patricio; I must be present at the memorial exercises to-night in his honor; I must receive the delegations from Madrid and the other cities, as well as the committees from the rest of the province. But what attitude ought I to assume? If I seem too sad, nobody will believe that my feeling is sincere. On the other hand, it would not be proper to appear alto- gether reconciled. Then people would think that I had for- gotten too quickly. In fact, they think so already. ZURITA. Oh, no! You were very young when you be- came a widow. Life was just beginning for you. CAROLINA. It is a delicate matter, however, to explain to my sisters-in-law. Tell me, what ought I to wear ? Anything severe, an attempt at mourning, would be ridiculous, since I am going with my husband; on the other hand, I should HIS WIDOW'S HUSBAND 7 not like to suggest a festive spirit. What do you think, friend Zurita? Give me your advice. What would you wear? ZURITA. It is hard to say; the problem is difficult. Some- thing rich and black, perhaps, relieved by a note of violet. The unveiling of a monument to perpetuate the memory of a great man is not an occasion for mourning. Your hus- band is partaking already of the joys of immortality, in wfeieh^ no doubt, he anticipates you. CAROLINA. Thank you so much. ZURITA. Do not thank me. You have done enough. You have been faithful to his memory. You have married again, but you have married a man who was your husband's most intimate friend. You have not acted like other widows of my acquaintance Senora Benitez, for example. She has been living for two years with the deadliest enemy her hus- band had in the province, without any pretense at getting married which in her case would have been preposterous. CAROLINA. There is no comparison. ZURITA.