j REV. MICHAEL SCHLATTER. The Early Father Reformed Church UNITED STATES. By REV. JAMES I. GOOD, D. D., // Author of "Origin of the Reformed Church in Germany," "History of the Reformed Church in Germany," and "Historical Handbook of the Reformed Church in the U. S." READING, PA. : DANIEL MILLER, PUBLISHER. COPYRIGHT, 1897, BY DANIEL MILLER. . L.1OUAU I UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA ?5!9/ SANTA BARBARA PREFACE. This little volume is issued at tbe suggestion of its publisher, Mr. Daniel Miller. It is hoped that it will increase the interest of our people in their splendid Church history. While issued in connection with the sesqui-centennial of our Church, it has, however, a per- manent value in bringing the lives of these fathers up to date. Harbaugh's " Fathers of the Reformed Church," Vols. I. and II., were excellent, but having been issued forty years ago, are now somewhat antiquated, and we have endeavored to utilize the material gathered since their issue. We would call the attention of the readers to the latest and most complete history of the Coetus in the " Presbyterian and Reformed Review" for October, 1897. THE AUTHOR. CONTENTS. Peter Minuit, 5 Rev. Samuel Guldin, 14 Rev. John Philip Boehm, \ . . 20 Rev. George Michael Weiss, 31 Rev. Michael Schlatter, 40 Rev. John Philip Leydich, 56 Rev. William Otterbein, 64 EEFOEMED CHURCH IN THE U. S. I. PETER MINTJIT. The forerunner of our German Reformed Church was Peter Mintiit. He was the earliest prominent Ger- man in North America. More than a century before our Church was organized, he landed in the Delaware (about 1638), and purchased Delaware and Pennsylvania up to Trenton. His life is, in many respects, a signi- ficant type of the German Reformed who began com- ing more than a half century later. Peter Minuit was born in 1580, at Wesel, in north- western Germany, one of the strongholds of the Re- formed Church in the sixteenth century. Born so early, he almost touches the Reformers of our Church, for both Olevianus and Ursinus were living when he was born. 2 6 EARLY FATHERS OF THE REF. CHURCH. He may, therefore, be called the link between the authors of the Heidelberg Catechism and the Reformed of the western world. Indeed, Olevianus must have been a well known name to him in boyhood, for he came from that part of Germany. He was of Hugu- enot or French Reformed stock, for Wesel had become a great asylum for the Reformed in the days of the Reformation. As a result, a large French Reformed church was formed there, of which later Peter Minuit was a deacon. He left Wesel during the awful Thirty Years' War, just before it was captured by the Span- iards and the Reformed subjected to great persecutions. Like many of his German cotemporaries, he entered the Dutch service, for the ruler of Holland was also a German prince of the house of Nassau. He must have been a man of prominence in his native city, to be so soon appointed to so prominent an office. For he left Wesel, April 15, 1625, and by December 19 of that year was appointed governor general of New Amster- dam (New York) in America. He sailed from Am- sterdam in the ship Sea Mew, January 9, 1626, and landed at New York, May 4, 1626. He there became the governor general of the West India Company of Holland, whose object was to plant colonies in Amer- ica, and to extend to this continent the blessings of civil and religious freedom. As he was of French PETER MINUIT. 7 blood, yet of German birth and in the employment of the Dutch, he was thus well fitted to represent the future Reformed churches of America, which have been made up of Dutch, German and French elements. He was an enlightened statesman. He stands out in history as the first to treat the Indians with justice. While the Spaniards had by force of arms dispossessed the Indians of their lands by fire and blood in Mexico and Peru, Minuit at once set up the policy of buying the land from them. Although the Dutch had taken New York by the right of discovery by Henry Hud- son, yet he determined to get a higher title to the land, namely by the right of purchase. His first act was to purchase, in 1626, the whole of Manhattan Island, 22,000 acres (now the site of New York City) for 24 dollars. This may seem a small sum when one considers the enormous value of New York property now, but it was not too little when one remembers the absolutely unimproved condition of the island, as well as the fact that 24 dollars then was worth much more than that amount now, especially to the Indians. William Penn has usually had the reputation of inau- gurating this policy of peaceful purchase from the Indians, but Minuit here began it eighteen years before Penn was born. Honor to whom honor is due. It was not only a very enlightened policy, but a very a. 8 EARLY FATHERS OF THE REF. CHURCH. wise, far-seeing one. For by this act he retained for the Dutch, for many years, the friendship of the Iro- quois or Five Nations of the Indians, and through this the New York colony largely escaped the horrors of Indian wars. For the Iroquois acted as a rampart against the French of Canada and their Indian allies, the Algouquins. Having bought Manhattan Island, he built on it a four-angled fort, faced with stone. His colony prospered so much under his administration that in a few years the fur trade amounted to 143,000 guilders. He fostered agriculture, and fields of grain began to wave on the island. Herds of cattle were seen roving over its pasture, and supplying the fort with milk and food. Minuit also gained the friend- ship of the governor of New England, which strength- ened both of these Protestant colonies against the hos tile power of Spain. He was an earnest Christian. He at once looked after the spiritual condition of his colony. There had been consolers of the sick, who held service in the colony before 1628, but in that year Rev. Mr. Mich- aelis, the first Reformed minister, became pastor. Minuit fostered this congregation, providing it with a place of worship in the loft of the mill in the fort. He showed his strong attachment to the Reformed faith by his attendance on its services, and by being an elder in PETER MINUIT. this new congregation. But his stay at New York did not continue very long, for the patroons attempted to lay hold of the best lands of the colony. Minuit opposed this aristocracy, and as a result was compelled to resign. But during the six years that he was gov- ernor, he laid the foundations of one of the greatest of our states and the greatest of our cities, as well as one of the oldest churches in this continent. u His integ- rity as an officer," says a writer, " served to raise up against him a host of enemies/' He resigned and sailed for Holland, March, 1632, having in his vessel 5,000 beaver skins as evidence of the prosperity of his rule. But it is not with his governorship in New York that we are most interested. We have referred to it because it reveals the greatness of his character. But we in Pennsylvania are interested in Minuit because of a later expedition that he brought to America. The Dutch West India Company having cast him aside, hjs great knowledge of America was to be utilized by another government, Sweden, and it was this that brought him into contact with Pennsylvania. A West India Company had long before been the dream of that Swedish conqueror, Gustavus Adolphus. After his death the company became active, and in 1637 Minuit was appointed its director general or governor. It is 10 EAELY FATHERS OF THE REF. CHURCH. an interesting fact to us that the great Reformed prince of Germany, Prince John Casimir of the Palatinate (the son of Elector Frederick III., who caused our catechism to be written), was an active promoter of this Swedish expedition. Minuit sailed from Gothenberg in Sweden, August, 1637, with two vessels a man-of- war, Key of Calmar, and a transport, Griffin. He entered Delaware bay and landed at Clarke's Point, March 15, 1638, and called it Paradise Point. Says Mr. Conrad in a recent address : " It was early in the springtime, the bursting foliage of our trees and shrubs, and the opening wild flowers of our woodlands and meadows loaded the air with perfume. After a long and tedious imprisonment in the narrow confines of a ship, it must have been unspeakably delightful to land on this promontory, and enjoy the freshness and beauty of the opening spring. They felt in truth they were in paradise, and so called it Paradise Point." He then turned aside from the Delaware and sailed up a creek called by the Indians the Minquas, which he named Christina in honor of the young queen of Sweden. Passing up this stream for two miles, they landed at a point called " The Rocks," where is a natural wharf of stone. Finding that there were no European settlers in that part of America, he took possession of the land in the name of Sweden by right of discovery. Here PETER MINUIT. 11 he pursued the same humane policy that he had in New York. He bought the land of the Indians, its original possessors. After spending a couple of weeks in ex- ploring the country, he met the Indian chiefs, March 29, 1638, at Christina Creek, and made a treaty with the Iroquois by which all the country from Cape Hen- lopen northward to the Falls of the Delaware at Tren- ton was bought from them by Sweden. Thus 44 years before Penn's famous treaty under the elm tree at Shakamaxon in Philadelphia, Minuit had begun the peaceful policy. He at once built a fort on the Christ- ina Creek. He encouraged the Indians to bring in furs. He was so successful that the first year 3,000 skins were exported. He made the colony so strong; that as long as he was with it the Dutch, who were jealous of it, dared not attack it. Minuit also culti- vated friendly relations with the neighboring English colony in Virginia, so that they might aid one another in case of war. After having arranged everything in the colony for its safety and success, Minuit set sail for the West Indies, to exchange his cargo for a cargo of tobacco. He was about to sail away, when the hospital- ities of a Dutch captain in the harbor of St. Christopher were offered to him before he left. During his visit to the Dutch ship a terrific hurricane came up, which drove all the vessels in the harbor out to sea. Among 12 EARLY FATHERS OF THE REF. CHURCH. those that sank was this Dutch vessel with Miuuit and all on board. Thus came and thus passed away the first promi- nent German Reformed in America. He is interesting to us as the forerunner of our Church. He organized the first Reformed church in America at New York, in 1628. And then he came to Delaware and eastern Pennsylvania to indirectly prepare the way for the future organization of our Church. It is true, the set- tlers of Delaware were Lutherans, for all Swedes are Lutherans ; yet a great many of the colonists to Dela- ware were Germans, and we can readily suppose that of these Germans some were Reformed, especially as Prince John Casimir of the Palatinate was interested in the expedition. Still the early Church at Delaware was Lutheran. However, when the Dutch captured Delaware from the Swedes, they founded a Reformed church at Newcastle, Delaware. This was the first appearance of the Heidelberg Catechism in this part of the new world. This church was in existence when William Penu landed in Pennsylvania, and for many years afterwards. This Dutch occupation of Delaware and Pennsylvania led to the establishment of the first Reformed church in Pennsylvania. For a colony of Dutch settled in Bucks county at Neshaminy (now Churchville, Bucks county). They were organized into PETER MINUIT. 13 a congregation in 1710, by Rev. Van Vleck. This minister did not limit his labors to the Dutch, but finding some German Reformed in that district, he bap- tized some of them at Skippack in 1710, and organized the first German Reformed congregation at White Marsh, nortu of Philadelphia, in the same year. This congregation soon after went to pieces, as Van Vleck left Pennsylvania. But the Germans who composed it remained, and when Boehm fifteen years later organ- ized a Reformed congregation there, we find the same Germans entering into it. Thus, though Peter Minuit died, his faith remained in Pennsylvania as a blessed legacy, and he may well be called the forerunner of our Church in America.* * For an excellent monograph of Peter Minuit we refer the reader to Rev. Dr. Cyrus Cort's " Peter Minuit Memorial " II. REV. SAMUEL GULDIN. If Peter Minuit was the secular forerunner of our Church in this country, Rev. Samuel Guldin was the spiritual forerunner. Not that Minuit was not spirit- ual, for he was a deeply religious man ; but he repre- sented the laity and the political element of our Church in American history. He stands out for what the laity have here done for our Church, and his life is a prophecy of what our Reformed faith has since done for America for it was political Calvinism that founded the freedom of these United States. Like Minuit, Gul- din was a forerunner ; however, his \vork was not political, but distinctively religious. He represents the evangelism that made our Church afterward spread so widely. It is true, Guldin had no hand in the organi- zation of our Church. He never belonged to the Coetus, our first Synod in Pennsylvania. Still his work should not be mimimized on that account. His preaching prepared the way for organization. Being probably the first Reformed minister in Pennsylvania, he did a very valuable work in preaching to the shep- EEV. SAMUEL GULDIN. 15 berdless Germans, in baptizing their children and administering the Lord's Supper. Their religious opportunities were so few that the coming of a Re- formed minister among any of their communities was a spiritual uplift to them. Guldin was a Swiss Pietist. The story of his con- version to God in the old country is quite interesting. In 1689 four theological students of Berne, the central canton of Switzerland, went on a tour southward to Lausanne and Geneva. Guldin was one of them. These students determined to make this trip a religious pilgrimage, so they resolved to avoid all useless reli- gious discussion, into which theological students so often plunge, and devote their time to prayer. As a result this trip led them to deep religious conviction and high personal consecration. After returning to their home in Berne, three of them went to Holland, where Guldin studied, but he says he still remained blind to his soul's salvation. Full conversion the blessed forgiveness of sin the finished work of Christ for him these he did not yet understand. On his return to Berne, he became pastor at Stettlen, a country parish, and remained there for nine months. But he felt his ministry was not being blessed, and he was even more dissatisfied with his own religious experience than with his work. So he determined to give up the ministry. On the day that he was about preaching his farewell sermon, he expe- 16 EA.RLY FATHERS OF THE REF. CHURCH. rienced a change of heart, August 4, 1693, between the hours of 9 and 10 A. M., just as he was preparing to preach that sermon. He did not preach that sermon, but remained with his congregation. His ministry now became very blessed and successful. He no longer preached dry dogmas in a cold and lifeless fashion, but he preached the Biblical truths illuminated by personal experience. As a result great crowds came to hear him, even from other parishes. So great did his popu- larity become that a little over a year after he was called to one of the leading pulpits of his canton. On December 21, 1694, he was elected assistant at the cathedral of the city of Berne, which placed him in the line of advancement to that of the leading position of the canton. Soon, however, opposition began to develop against Pietism. The worldly element in the Church objected to the strict use of church discipline, which the Pietists demanded, and which the latter rightly said was required by the Heidelberg Catechism in questions 81 85. The irreligious element in the Church was made uncomfortable by the plain preaching of the Pietists against their sins. One of the Pietists, Konig, began preaching premillenariauism, or the doctrine that Christ will come before the milleuium and set up a visible kingdom on earth before the last great day. This doc- trine had previously been regarded as not Reformed. REV. SAMUEL GULDIN. 17 As a result there was a reaction against Guldin and his party, led by Bachman, the head minister of the Berne church. Konig was exiled and Guldin was compelled to resign his prominent position, although he still remained a minister of the Reformed church of Berne. In the course of time Pietism became recognized in Berne, and has since been influential there. Its great opponent, Bachman, died. Konig was recalled as a professor in 1730, and often preached in the churches, while Dachs, another of this band of Pietists, became the head of the Berne church in 1732. Guldin, how- ever, did not wait for this final vindication of Pietism there. Deprived of his position at the cathedral at Berne, he took four years later a country parish at Boltigen. But he was not comfortable, nor were the state authorities satisfied with him, and he was finally banished. He then seems to have wandered into north- ern Germany, and finally emigrated to America, per- haps about 1718. In that year he published a "De- fence of the Unjustly Suspected Pietists of Berne" at Philadelphia. In America he found a wide field for preaching, as there were no Reformed ministers among the Germans. We can see him with his evangelistic spirit preaching to the Reformed, gathered wherever they could, in barns, groves, houses anywhere, as they had as yet no churches. And when their first church at Germantown was erected, he frequently preached there. 18 EAELY FATHERS OF THE REF. CHURCH. But his home was at Oley, in the eastern part of Berks Bounty, where he lived the life of a quiet farmer, preaching as he had opportunity. He thus lived qui- etly until 1743, when he again became prominent just before his death. Count Zinzendorf, the leader of the Moravians, had arrived in this country, and was trying to form a union denomination among the Germans, in which the Moravian should be the leading element. He began his work at Germantown in the Reformed church there, and among the Lutherans in their con- gregation in Philadelphia. It was expected that Gul- din, who had been a Pietist in Switzerland, would read- ily sympathize with this movement to elevate the piety of the Germans. Guldin attended the first Synod of that united body at Germantown in January, 1 742, but afterwards came out against them, very severely criti- cising their methods. He declared that there was entirely too much division among them ever to make much progress. As a result there was a lack of dis- tinctness in what they did believe. For his part he preferred the Heidelberg Catechism and its earnest irenical spirit. The truth was that while Guldin was a Pietist, he was not a fanatic, but a churchly Pietist, who loved his Church, his creed, and highly honored its sacraments. Guldin's influence carried far among a certain class of the early settlers, who were longing for more religious life and light, and his warning REV. SAMUEL GULDIN. 19 against Zinzendorf kept many of them back in their old denominations. But while Guldin thus loved and honored his Reformed faith and catechism, he did not organize any churches. In his book he makes boast against his enemies that he had never attempted like them to found a new sect. He simply preferred to be a plain evangelist, preaching the gospel to those who desired to hear him. To the last he claimed to be Reformed, although he loved all believers, and he claimed, like all the Reformed Pietists of Germany, as Lampe and Untereyck, that they had never departed from the Reformed faith, but were true to its best and earliest phase of piety and belief. Guldin died at Philadelphia, December 31, 1745. His descendent, Rev. John G. Guldin, was at one time one of our prominent ministers, and seems to have inherited and revealed the earnest spirit of his first ancestor in America. Rev. Samuel Guldin, by strength- ening the hands of the scattered Reformed against fanaticism, and by ministering to them in their desti- tute condition, performed a valuable work in pre- paring the way for the organization of our Church, and can well be remembered as a forerunner of the Re- formed Church.* * For a valuable monograph on Guldin see Prof. Dubb's article on Guldin, the Pioneer and Pietist, in the Reformed Church Quarterly, July, 1892. III. RfcV. JOHN PHILIP B(EHM. From the forerunners of our Church, like Minuit and Guldin, we pass now to her founders. John Philip Boehm may be justly called the founder of our Church. He came to this country about 1720 from the city of Worms, on the borders of the Palatinate in western Germany. There he had been a Reformed school- master, but had been driven out by the Catholics because of his faith. In 1719 the Reformed of the neighboring Palatinate had to pass through severe per- secutions. The Catholic Elector of the Palatinate, Charles Philip, forbade them to use their Heidelberg Catechism, and took from them their most important church at Heidelberg, the Church of the Holy Ghost. He forced them to observe Catholic feast days, to bow before the host when it passed through the streets, and to suffer many other persecutions. Doubtless the influence of these persecutions spread to Worms, and the Catholic intolerance drove Boehm out. After his arrival in America he became schoolmaster to the Re- formed who lived north of Philadelphia, in the region EEV. JOHN PHILIP BCEHM. 21 now called Montgomery county. In 1725 the Re- formed of that district were so pleased with him that they came to him and asked him to serve as their pas- tor. He, however, held back, as he had never been ordained to the ministry, but they continued their appeals the more earnestly. So finally making a vir- tue of necessity, as there were no Reformed ministers to be found, he accepted, " protesting before God that he could not justify his refusal of so necessary a work." He at once began organizing the Reformed thoroughly into congregations, and he was thus the first to organ- ize the Reformed in Pennsylvania. He had three con- sistories elected, in all three of the congregations, namely at Falkner Swamp, Skippack and White Marsh. Of these the last two went to pieces afterwards, though revived later. Falkner Swamp, however, remains as the oldest Reformed congregation in our denomination. Bcehm's pay was, as the Germans say, " Was fallt," and as the settlers were mainly poor, what fell into the collection basket for the church was small. So he had to serve these congregations for many years at almost no salary, meanwhile supporting himself by working during the week on his farm. In 1727 another Reformed minister, Rev. George Michael Weiss, arrived from the Palatinate and began preaching in Philadelphia. As he was an ordained 3 22 EARLY FATHERS OF THE REF. CHURCH. minister, some of Boehm's congregation at Skippack, led by Jacob Reiff, preferred him to Bcehm. So Bcehm's congregations took steps to have him ordained. This the Dutch Reformed of New York, at the advice of the Holland fathers, did on November 23, 1729. Boehm at this ordination declared his adherence to the Heidelberg Catechism and the Canons of Dort. His congregations remained under the care of the Holland Church, and to it he sent frequent reports. In 1730 he was again left alone in his work, as Rev. Mr. Weiss went back to Europe. As a result he had to take care, not merely of his own three congregations, but also of the Philadelphia congregation, to which he preached once a month. Meanwhile his field was enlarging west- ward, as the Germans were spreading out west of the Schuylkill, even to Lancaster county ; and calls came to him from Conestoga to come and administer the sacraments. He went and administered the commun- ion to them, October 14, 1727, and found 59 members. Another district, north of Conestoga, called Tul- pehocken, was being settled by the Germans. This settlement had been increased by a number of Germans who came there from New York state. For Queen Ann of England, in 1708, invited the poor Palatines to come to London, and they came in such numbers that the English did not know what to do with them. REV. JOHN PHILIP BCEHM. 23 She sent a colony of 4,000 of them to New York, but they soon had a disagreement with the governor there and went farther into the wilderness, settling in Schoharie county on land given them by the Indians. In the course of time their title to these lands was questioned, so a number of them, consisting of thirty- three families, led by Conrad Weiser, the Indian inter- preter, came down the east branch of the Susquehanna, floating on rafts, while the men drove the cattle along the shore, until they reached the Swatara creek, up which they travelled till they came to Tulpehocken. To this German district Bcehm. came, October 18, 1727, and administered the communion for the first time to thirty-two communicants. He left these congregations in charge of schoolmasters, but regularly twice a year he visited them, to see how the work was prospering and to administer the sacraments. Meanwhile his district continued enlarging. Calls came to him to preach and administer the sacraments from the northern districts, as Macungie and Egypt. In a letter of 1734 Boehrn very touchingly describes the pressing needs and destitution of the German col- onists. He says : "A minister is needed in Sacony, Macungie, Maxatawny and Great Swamp to feed the poor sheep who live on the borders of the wilderness, and who thirst to hear God's Word as the dry earth 24 EARLY FATHERS OF THE REF. CHURCH. thirsts for water. Some who were able to make the journey have at various times come all the way to Falkner Swamp, a distance of 25 or 30 miles, and brought little children all that distance for baptism. It w r as impossible for old persons and weak sick women to make such a journey. It is, therefore, not to be wondered at that one's heart breaks and one's eyes are full of tears at remembering this. Alone I cannot attend to all this, for my years are beginning to accu- mulate, and my poor body is beginning to get feeble, for I must not only make long journeys and preach, but also because these poor people are not able to sup- port me, I must by hard manual labor support my large family." We do not know of any more pathetic appeal in the early history of our Church than this one made by Boahm for help. He was virtually pastor of all the Reformed from the Delaware to the Susquehanna, and from Philadelphia to the Blue Mountains (with the exception, perhaps, of one or two small congregations), a territory about 100 miles square and containing now about eight counties, and covered now by seven Re- formed Classes. His work is eloquently described by his biographer, Mr. Henry S. Dotterer, in his excel- lent monograph :* " When he began, in 1720, the Indi- * See John Philip Boehtn, by H. S. Dotterer. REV. JOHN PHILIP BCEHM. 25 ans were still numerous, having been little disturbed by the sprinkling of white settlers. At that time few lawful roads had been laid out for travel, and he had to thread his toilsome way on horseback through the deep forest, over hills and across streams, over rough and tortuous paths. At intervals of miles apart he would come upon the clearing made by the hardy settler, shel- tered in a newly made log hut. At these rude fire- sides he was a welcome guest. Here he comforted the afflicted and homesick, and at their Sabbath gathering he brought to them Gospel blessings denied to them since they left Germany these many years. He bap- tized the children, catechized the youth and buried the dead." While Boehni was thus spreading out his work, so as to cover the field to its extremest limit, and to sup- ply the shepherdless Reformed with the bread of life, there was danger of a collapse near the centre of his work. This began at the Reformed church at Ger- mantown, for it, with the Reformed church at Goshen- hoppen, had remained independent of Bcehm. Ger- mantown had been founded by the sects, and as a result the Reformed congregation was affected by its environ- ment. When Count Zinzeudorf, the leader of the Mo- ravians, arrived in 1741, he found them ripe for his purposes. His first sermon in America he preached in 26 EARLY FATHERS OF THE REF. CHURCH. the Reformed church at Germantown. Its pastor, Rev. John Bechtel, was soon after ordained by a Moravian. Zinzendorf's aim was to start a union denomination among the Germans. They could remain Reformed or Lutheran, yet could be related to the Moravian Church as circles or tropes of it. There is no doubt that there was a great need (owing to the great religious destitu- tion) of gathering the pious together, no matter of what denomination. But in gathering them together, Zin- zendorf gathered such diverse elements that the union part of the movement soon went to pieces, and what was left was absorbed by the Moravians, who had been the most influential in it. Bcehm rose up to oppose this movement, which threatened to carry into it con- gregation after congregation of the Reformed, for Zin- zendorfhad Lischy ordained as the Swiss Reformed preacher, and Bechtel he had appointed as the Reformed Inspector, both of whom were especially to work among the Reformed, and win them from Boehm and their Heidelberg Catechism. Boehm attacked this move- ment, because he was confessional that is, he believed in his own denomination and creed. He came into collision with Zinzeudorf, whom he accused of insin- cerity that Zinzendorf professed to be a Lutheran, when he was not, as he was a Moravian. The Re- formed in this union movement (which was called EEV. JOHN PHILIP BCEHM. 27 the Congregation of God in the Spirit) made reply. They charged that Boehm did not properly represent the Reformed, but only the Dutch Reformed, with whom he was so closely allied, and who were high Cal- vinists, while they represented the true German Re- formed, who were low Calvinists, like the Reformed at Berlin, whose minister, Jablonsky, had ordained Zin- zendorf as Bishop. Bechtel seems to have gone so far as to incline toward perfectionism, and attacked the 114th question of the Heidelberg Catechism. Brehm attacked them in two pamphlets, his " Letter of True Warning," August 23, 1742, and again in his "Another Letter of Warning," May 19, 1743. These warned the Reformed against this new movement. As a result the congregations remained true to their old Reformed faith, although a number of individuals went over to the Moravians. Even the congregation at German- town, which had been carried over, soon tired of its pastor, Bechtel, and he had to resign in 1744. Boehm had thus saved the Reformed Church in her first great controversy. He thus proved to be her defender, as well as her founder and organizer. But the shadows of age began to creep over Boahm, and, as he says in the letter above, he felt the burden of his labors to be too heavy. Those upon whom he had hoped to cast the burden of his labors failed him. 28 EARLY FATHERS OF THE REF. CHURCH. It was, therefore, with great joy and relief that he found two ministers arriving in Pennsylvania, in 1746, to relieve him. Rev. Mr. Weiss returned from New York state, and Rev. Michael Schlatter arrived from Holland, with instructions from the Reformed Church of Holland to organize the Pennsylvania congregations, so that they could be provided with ministers. The first meeting of Bcehm, the aged founder, and of Schlatter, the new organizer of our Church, took place at Witpen, September 7, 1746. About two weeks later Mr. Bcehm takes Mr. Schlatter and Mr. Weiss to visit his Tulpehocken congregation, Septem- ber 25, where these three administered the communion. He gladly relinquished to Mr. Schlatter the congrega- tion at Philadelphia and installed him as its pastor, January 1, 1747. While Mr. Schlatter travelled up and down among the Reformed settlements, organizing them, Boehm aided him with his advice. And when the first Coetus met, September 29, 1747, he acted as its secretary. He was very glad the next year to have three more Reformed ministers arrive, one of whom, Mr. Bartholomaus, took charge of his Tulpehockeu congregation, while Mr. Rieger had taken charge of his Schsefferstown congregation. Rev. Mr. Leydich also took his two congregations at Falkner Swamp and Providence (Trappe). REV. JOHN PHILIP BCEHM. 29 Boehm now limited his labors to the Reformed around his home at Witpen and organized there a con- gregation in 1746 the congregation now named after him ("Bcehm's Church"). But it was hard work. The number was few. Most of them were poor. They built their church, but' could not furnish it. Still they labored on in hope, encouraged by their aged pastor. But Bcehm's missionary spirit could not be re- strained. He had so long been accustomed to travel great distances to minister to shepherdless flocks. A nd so when a request came from the Macungie and Egypt congregations at the beginning of 1749, as they were without a pastor, to come and supply them, he could not refuse in spite of his age. That self-denying zeal and devotion led to his death, for it was while at Egypt to celebrate the communion, April 30, that he sud- denly died on Saturday night, after having held the preparatory service. Bcehm deserves great honor for his industry, self- denial and faithfulness to his Church. Our Church is just beginning to realize the greatness of his labors. For 24 years he preached the Gospel for almost no pay, supporting himself and his family by his own hands, while all the time he underwent great privations, labors and suiferings through the long journeys he took to his congregations. He travelled immense distances, faced 30 EARLY FATHERS OF THE REF. CHURCH. great dangers, wore out his health and strength in the service of our Church, and died in the harness. He founded and organized our Church, defended her against the Moravians, gave her her constitution, and stamped her character upon her. He being dead, yet speaketh. Not only the congregation named after him, but also the whole Reformed Church in the United States, is a monument of his zeal and consecration. IV. EEV, GEOEGE MICHAEL WEISS, Rev. Mr. Weiss was a native of the Palatinate, hav- ing been born at Stebbach, in the valley of the Neckar. He was educated and ordained at Heidelberg, and came to America in 1727. On September 21, 1727, a sloop named William and Sarah anchored in the Delaware river at Philadelphia, having on it 400 emigrants from the Palatinate and elsewhere in Germany, headed by Rev. Mr. Weiss. When they registered, they solemnly took the oath of allegiance to King George II. of Great Britain. Rev. Dr. Andrews, pastor of the Presbyte- rian church of Philadelphia in 1730, says of them : " There is in this province a vast number of Palatines, and they come in still every year. Those that have come of late years are mostly Presbyterians, or, as they call themselves, Reformed. They did use to come to me for baptism, and many have joined with us in the other sacrament. They never had a minister till nine years ago, who is a bright young man and a fine scholar." 32 EARLY FATHERS OF THE REF. CHURCH. The reference " nine years ago" has been hard to explain. Dr. Weiser says it refers to Boehm's preach- ing in Philadelphia, but that is not correct. Mr. J. T. Sachse, in some recent evidence he has found, claims that his arrival in 1727 was Mr. Weiss' second trip to America, and that his first trip occurred about eight years before. It is a difficult question. Mr. Weiss, finding that the Reformed people of Philadelphia were poor and unable to support a min- ister, offered himself as teacher of logic and metaphys- ics. The Philadelphia Mercury of February 3, 1729, contains the following : " This is to give notice that the subscriber hereof, being desirous to be as generally useful as he can in this country (wherein he is a stranger), declares his willingness to teach Logic, Natural Philosophy, Meta- physics, etc., to all such as are willing to learn. The place of teaching will be at the widow Sprogel's, on Second street, where he will attend, if he has encour- agement, three times a week for that exercise. " Signed by G. M., " Minister of the Reformed Palatinate Church." Mr. Weiss had a curious difficulty with some of these Germans. He came over, bringing with him his ordination certificate in Latin. As the plain country Germans could not read that classic language, they REV. GEORGE MICHAEL WEISS. 33 looked with some suspicion upon it, as if Mr. Weiss were a pretender to the ministry and not a real min- ister. We can excuse them for this, for they had had a number of wolves in sheep's clothing get into their congregations under false pretences. So he wrote back to the Palatinate for a certificate in German. This was sent, dated at Heidelberg, April 26, 1728, and signed by the prominent Reformed minister there, L. C. Mieg. It says of Mr. Weiss : " We testify, as we did before, that he is not only right-minded in doctrine and un- blamable in life, peace-loving and sociable in his walk and conversation, but also edifying in his manifold discourses preached before us. We have no doubt but that, if the Lord grant him life and health, he will prove useful and be the means of edifying many souls." Mr. Weiss seems to have seen the danger that was coming to the Germans in America from the sects, because the churches had so few ministers. So he pub- lished the first work issued by any of our ministers : " The Minister in the American Wilderness," etc. (1729). It was a booklet of 29 pages, and was directed against a sect called the " New Born," who seem to have claimed themselves to be sinless. But Mr. Weiss' influence and activity did not stop with Philadelphia. Some of his friends and fellow travellers, among whom were the Hillegas family, had 34 EARLY FATHERS OF THE REF. CHURCH. settled up the Perkiomeu valley, above Skippack. Through them he came into contact with Jacob Reiff, the prominent elder of Bcehm's congregation at Skip- pack. As Boehm was not an ordained minister as yet, Reiff and his friends at Skippack took sides against him, preferring Weiss, who was an ordained minister and a scholar. As a result there was friction between Boehm and Weiss. The three congregations of Boehm took measures to rectify the matter. They applied to the Dutch Reformed ministers of New York for ordi- nation for Mr. Boehm. The latter, at the request of the Holland fathers, ordained Mr. Boehm, November 23, 1729. After this, Boehm and Weiss were recon- ciled, but their reconciliation did not bring back the disaffected at Skippack to Bcehm, although the Classis of Amsterdam in Holland urged them to do so. On the contrary, the followers of Reiff built a small wooden church for service there, right on Reift's property, and the latter would not allow Bcehm to preach in it. As a result of this unhappy strife at Skippack, the con- gregation ultimately went to pieces, although afterwards revived by Leydich. Weiss through this became quite intimate with Reiff, and as Reiff determined to go to Europe, Weiss decided to accompany him. They left in 1729, bearing instructions from the Reformed con- gregations at Philadelphia and Skippack to raise funds REV. GEORGE MICHAEL WEISS. 35 for them. Mr. Weiss' arrival in Holland created con- siderable interest. The churches, especially of the South Holland Synod, became interested in the matter, and they drew up a report, which was probably gotten up after conference with Mr. Weiss, " that in Pennsyl- vania there are about 30,000 Germans, of whom half are Reformed ; that they are without ministers and greatly need churches, especially at Skippack." (Reiff probably pressed the claims of Skippack.) Weiss never seems to be able to say anything about the new world, but he has to speak of the Indians, and so in this report occurs the following : "A ground of hope is found in the fact as to the nature and disposition of the aborigi- nes of the land. They are right in their conduct, faith- ful to their word, and are particularly friendly to the Palatinate Germans dwelling among them. These Ger- mans, having themselves been subjected to oppression, are familiar with them and friendly to them, allowing them to lodge in their barns at night, finding them protection from the cold and rain by their firesides, granting them to sow their grain within their bound- aries, thus freeing them from the wild horse which otherwise consumed their grain. By this means the good will and confidence of the Indians has been so far gained that the Palatines can travel free and without hindrance through that land, and be conducted and 36 EARLY FATHERS OF THE REF. CHURCH. escorted by the Indians and furnished by them with food ; while they feel injured if payment should be offered to them for it. What may not be hoped for when a popular ministry shall be instituted among them and the Gospel preached to them ?" The favorable action of this Synod was emphasized by an event that took place when the next Synod of South Holland met at Dort, Eight hundred Palatines passed through the place to take ship at Rotterdam for America. The whole Synod in a body visited them, and furnished them with medicines and provisions. After Christian exhortation, prayer and singing, they were dismissed with the assurance that the Synod of Holland would not forget them in their new abode. This action of the Synod and the appeals of Mr. Weiss created widespread interest, and a considerable amount of money was raised. Weiss returned to America in 1731, but Reiff remained abroad a year longer. As Reiff was the custodian of the money collected, suspi- cion was raised against Weiss on his return. He, how- ever, was innocent, for it was Reiff who held the money, so that the needy congregations got nothing of it till 1 746, when Mr. Schlatter had Reiff settle the claim by paying over about 650 dollars. Mr. Weiss, in the meantime, left Pennsylvania and went to New York state, where he became pastor at REV. GEORGE MICHAEL WEISS. 37 Khinebeck and Burnetsfielcl, for there were a large number of German Reformed in New York state who afterward became part of the Dutch Reformed Church. While there he continued his interest in the Indians. He preached to the Indians through an interpreter, baptized a number of them, and ten years later speaks of having brought many of them to Christ. He wrote a description of them to the Holland fathers and sent a picture of them to Holland. But the depredations of the Indians in the Mohawk region compelled him to think of looking for a safer place of abode. So he longed to come again to Pennsylvania. In 1742 he expressed a willingness to return to Pennsylvania, if a congregation were open to him. It was, however, not until 1746 that Mr. Weiss returned to Pennsylvania, and became pastor of the Goshenhoppen and Great Swamp congregations. Mr. Schlatter arrived soon after in Pennsylvania, and was warmly welcomed by Mr. Weiss, who aided him by his advice and sympathy. Into the organization of the Coetus he entered heartily, and was present both at the preliminary meeting in 1746 and at the first Coetus in 1747. For some reason he was not present at the sec- ond Coetus in 1748. He was president of the Coetus of 1750. But after Mr. Steiner's dispute with Mr. Schlatter in Philadelphia, he at last became estranged 4 38 EARLY FATHERS OF THE REF. CHURCH. from Mr. Schlatter and joined the opposition to him. He was much pained at the division in the Coetus, and proposed (1752) a new constitution for the Coetus, which he drafted and sent to the Holland fathers, but it was never adopted. When Mr. Schlatter and Mr. Steiner became reconciled in 1753, he again became active in the Coetus, and ever after was one of its pillars. Mr. Weiss' health began to give way by 1759, so that he was often excused from attendance at the Coetus. He died in 1762, some time before the Coetus met, which was on June 30. From the will of his wife, made in 1765, we find that he must have been a man of some means, and was the owner of negro slaves, whom he had baptized into the Reformed faith, and whom she liberated by her will. Tradition, says Rev. Dr. Weiser, has it that the will was not carried out, and the slaves were sold. But a strange fatality set in. One by one they died on the hands of their new owners. The master of a slave girl in Germantown, hearing of this fatality, became alarmed and brought her in a car- riage to the neighborhood, and after selling the negro- land, which properly fell to her, to Peter Hillegass, its former owner, he handed the proceeds to the girl and liberated her. The tract was long known as the negro- land. EEV. GEORGE MICHAEL WEISS. 39 Father Weiss' memory still lingers in the Goshen- hoppen congregation. Just outside of the New Goshen- hoppen church is his tombstone, on which is the inscrip- tion in German : " Here rests Rev. George Michael Weiss." And he is remembered not only by that charge, but by the whole Reformed Church as one of her earliest fathers and founders. V. EEV. MICHAEL SCHLATTER, If Mr. Boehm was the founder of our Church, Mr. Schlatter completed the organization by calling together the first Coetus, September 29, 1747, at Philadelphia, whose sesqui-centennial we celebrate this year. Rev. Mr. Schlatter was born at St. Gall, Switzer- land, July 14, 1716. His father kept a bookstore, and belonged to a family long prominent in that city, one of them having been dekan or leading minister of the canton in 1715. Since the days of the Reformation there have been two main families of Schlatters there, from one of which was descended the sweet poetess of Switzerland, Anna Schlatter, and also the great Re- formed pulpit orator of the last century, Zollikoffer of Leipzic, whose mother was a Schlatter. From the other family came our Michael Schlatter. There Mich- ael went to the cantonal school and attended the gym- nasium under the care of the famous teacher, Barthol- omew Wegelin. He was possessed of a roving disposi- tion and left home for a while, wandering to Germany in company with a young man from Berne named REV. MICHAEL SCHLATTER. 41 Hiirner. It is said he went to Helmstadt, but prob- ably not to study. This roving disposition God after- wards utilized to bring him to America to do His work in organizing our Church. Returning to St. Gall, he continued his studies, and was licensed as a minister, April 10, 1739. As positions were hard to get by young ministers, he acted as tutor for a while, and so went to Holland, where he was engaged as a private tutor. He returned to Switzerland, and in 1744 be- came vicar or assistant to dekan (or superintendent) Beyel at Wigoldiugen, in the neighboring canton of Thurgau. Here he remained but a short time, for by August 17, 1745, he had returned to St. Gall and become evening preacher at the church at Linzebiihl, the southern suburb of St. Gall ; that is, he was assist- ant preacher there, preaching on Sunday afternoon, while the principal minister preached in the morning. The church still stands as it was then. (We have a picture of it as it existed in the last century.) It is a small plain church, with rough benches for seats, with no carpet, and with only a pulpit and baptismal font as furniture. Here, however, he continued only five mouths, for on January 9, 1746, he suddenly left and went to Holland, stopping at Heidelberg on the way. The Classis of Amsterdam had just been looking for some one to send to America to superintend the organi- 42 EARLY FATHERS OF THE REF. CHURCH. zation of the German churches of Pennsylvania, and so the deputies there, who had charge of the matter, appointed him, May 23, 1746, instructing him to travel through the German districts and find out what each congregation would give to support a minister, and also to organize them into a Coetus (or Synod) sub- ject to the Reformed Church of Holland, which would then support them. By June 1 he had sailed for America, where he landed two months later at Boston, although on July 24, while off Cape Breton, he was very near being shipwrecked on Sable Island. After remaining a short time in New York city, in confer- ence with the Dutch Reformed ministers there, he arrived at Philadelphia, September 6,' 1746, and was gladly received by the Reformed congregation there, one of whose elders entertained him at his house for a long time. Immediately he began his missionary jour- neys, which were remarkable for their length and con- tinuance. He said in his appeal issued afterward, in 1751, that he had travelled 8,000 miles in America. He at once visited Mr. Boehm at Witpen. The next week he visited Mr. Dorstius, the pastor of the Dutch Reformed congregation at Neshaminy, Pa. The week following he visited Mr. Weiss at Goshenhoppen, and settled up the accounts with Jacob Reiff, who paid him about $650 or $700 as the result of the collection made REV. MICHAEL SCHLATTER. 43 in Europe in 1731. Then, together with Messrs. Bcehm and Weiss, he went to Tulpehocken, where they together administered the communion on September 25, when the people wept at seeing so many Reformed ministers together, a sight they had not seen since leav- ing the fatherland many years before. On October 12 he had a friendly conference at Philadelphia with Bcehm, Weiss and Rieger. For a year he continued these missionary journeys, visited the scattered Re- formed, organizing them into congregations, and find- ing out how much each congregation would give for the support of a minister. He also became pastor of the Philadelphia congregation, and was installed over it by Rev. Mr. Boehm, December 21, 1746, and over the Germantown congregation, February 15, 1747. He, however, declined to receive any salary for the first year. The first Coetus, whose sesqui-centennial we cele- brate this year, met at the Reformed church in Phila- delphia, September 29, 1747. Four ministers were present Boehm, Weiss, Rieger and Schlatter. There were twenty-seven elders present from twelve charges, as follows : Philadelphia, Falkner Swamp, Providence and Witpen, Old Goshenhoppen and Great Swamp, Schseffer's church and Erlentown, Tulpehocken, Indian- field, Springfield, Blue Mountain and Egypt, Little 44 EARLY FATHERS OF THE REF. CHURCH. Lehigh, Sacony, and York. Lancaster was not repre- sented. Of those present none of the ministers have any descendents in our ministry as far as we know, and only two of the elders probably have descendents in Rev. Mr. Ranck of Mechanicsburg and Rev. Mr. Wotring of Nazareth. The Coetus approved the instructions of the Holland fathers to Mr. Schlatter, and also his work in organizing the congregations. They appointed him to write the report of their pro- ceedings to the Holland fathers, and to ask them for the ministers necessary for the vacant charges. They appointed a committee to look into the case of Mr. I>ischy, who had been a Moravian, but who wanted to come back to the Reformed. And they ordered the money collected by Mr. Boehm to be given to the new congregation at Witpeu, as the church at Skippack, for which it had been collected, had gone to pieces. After the Coetus Mr. Schlatter continued his mis- sionary journeys for another year, besides acting as pastor of the congregations at Philadelphia and Ger- mantown. In 1748 the second Coetus met at Phila- delphia, September 29. Mr. Boehm, who had been the secretary the year before, was made president, and Mr. Rieger was made secretary. Three new young ministers joined the Coetus Leydich, Bartholomaus and Hochreutiner. This Coetus is, perhaps, the most REV. MICHAEL SCHLATTER. 45 important, for it adopted the creed of the Church and its constitution. All the ministers signed an agree- ment to hold to the Heidelberg Catechism and the Canons of Dort, thus making the Church strongly Cal- vinistic. Mr. Rieger was the only one who objected to this, but he subsequently, at the Coetus of 1752, also signed the Canons of Dort, so that all the early ministers were Calvinistic. The Coetus also adopted, as its constitution, the congregational constitution drawn up by Mr. Bcehm in 1725 for his three congregations of Falkner Swamp, Skippack and White Marsh ; also adding certain other rules of order to it. Mr. Schlatter continued his labors at Philadelphia and Germantown after the Coetus, but was greatly sad- dened by the sudden death of Rev. Mr. Hochreutiner at Philadelphia, just as this young minister was about starting to enter on his congregation at Lancaster (his gun accidentally discharged, killing him). But he was somewhat comforted at the end of October by the arrival of two new Dutch Reformed students for the ministry, DuBois and Marinus, ready to enter upon the work in America. On September 27, 1747, the third Coetus was opened at Lancaster, but it did not complete its business, as during its sessions word came that a new minister had arrived in Philadelphia, Rev. John Conrad Stei- 46 EARLY FATHERS OF THE REF. CHURCH. ner, from Switzerland, with letters from the Holland fathers. So they adjourned to meet October 20, at Philadelphia, and act on the instructions of those let- ters. When the Coetus met, Mr. Steiner's sickness prevented his attendance at the Coetus, but Mr. Schlat- ter placed in his hand a call from the congregation at Lancaster. However, before Mr. Steiner's arrival in America there had been a party formed in the Phila- delphia congregation against Mr. Schlatter. The rea- son of this opposition to Mr. Schlatter was not opposi- tion to the supervision of the Dutch and their high Calvinism, but it was due to other causes. That it was not due to that cause, is shown by the fact that they afterwards chose Mr. Steiner as their pastor, yet Mr. Steiner was sent over by those same Holland fathers. This dissatisfied element joined itself to Mr. Steiner (who was a considerably older man than Mr. Schlatter, and who had already won considerable literary reputa- tion in his native country), and asked him to become pastor. This produced a division in the congregation, and at a congregational election the adherents of Mr. Steiner outvoted those of Mr. Schlatter. The matter was referred to arbiters, who decided that the church belonged to the Schlatter party, and also decided that Mr. Schlatter was innocent of all the charges that the Steiner party brought against him. Mr. Steiner's party REV. MICHAEL SCHLATTER. 47 then withdrew and formed another congregation. Mr. Schlatter continued preaching in the old church, and also visiting the different congregations. On November 16, 1750, the fourth Coetus was held. The outlook for church affairs was not very hopeful. Of the sixteen charges only six had ministers, while thirty-two congregations were without pastors. Besides, the interchange of letters with Holland was not regu- lar, many letters being belated or lost. So an extra session of Coetus was held, December 13, when it was decided that it was necessary that some one from Penn- sylvania should go to Holland and in person lay their condition before the Holland fathers, and get from them aid and ministers. Mr. Schlatter was chosen to do this, and Messrs. Weiss, Leydich and Lischy agreed to supply the Philadelphia congregation with preach- ing during his absence. Schlatter sailed from New Castle, Delaware, February 5, 1751, and arrived at England, March 11, and at Holland, April 12. He happened to arrive just in the nick of time, for the Classis of Amsterdam met shortly after, May 3. He laid before them the sad, destitute condition of the Pennsylvania churches, and also made a full statement of his difficulties in Philadelphia with Mr. Steiner. The Classis cleared him in the latter case, and ordered him to draft an appeal to the churches. This appeal, 48 EARLY FATHERS OF THE REF. CHURCH. together with his journal, endorsed by the deputies, was ordered to be printed and circulated. It was printed in Dutch, German and English.* This appeal soon began to bear fruit in Holland, as money began to coine in for the destitute German churches in America. The states of Holland and West Friesland voted 2,000 guilders for five years. At the request of the Synod, Mr. Schlatter went to Germany and Switzerland. The Palatinate church, although so poor and oppressed, raised 300 guilders for its children in Pennsylvania. And some of the Swiss cantons gave something. The whole amount raised was $00,000, whose interest was to be yearly applied to the Pennsylvania churches. But best of all, especially through the influence of Prof. Arnoldi of the University of Herborn, six young ministers decided to come with him to America to preach the Gospel in the vacant charges. He sailed from Europe in March, 1752, and arrived in America, July 28 of that year. The coming of so many young men, together with the report of his success in the rais- ing of money in Europe, led to a large attendance at the Coetus of 1752, Steiner alone being absent. But it was soon evident that there was not entire unity amo^g the brethren. One of the young ministers whom Mr. * For a full text of the appeal, see Harbaugh's Life of Schlatter, pages 84234. KEY. MICHAEL SCHLATTER. 49 Sch latter brought had been called to the congregation at Philadelphia, in place of Mr. Schlatter. He was called by the Coetus " the rebellious Rubel." He did not prove at all wise or safe, but in his call to Phila- delphia he was largely the creature of circumstances. All this made Mr. Schlatter's position rather uncom- fortable. He had no place where to employ his pas- toral gifts, except the little congregation at Witpen, left vacant by Mr. Boehm's death. Later he began preaching in Philadelphia, at the request of the Coetus, as there were some in the congregation who remained loyal to him. But there was a growing opposition to him in the Coetus, led by Weiss and Leydich, while Steiner and Rubel with their congregations held abso- lutely aloof from the Coetus. However, late in 1753 Steiner and Schlatter became reconciled, and that healed the trouble, while Mr. Rubel, some years after, was ordered by the Holland fathers to give up the Phila- delphia congregation, and he left Pennsylvania. But a new field of labor was opening up to Mr. Schlatter. It seemed as if his work in the Coetus had been accomplished by its organization and the raising of so much money for it in Europe. His visit to Eu- rope, however, had called the attention of the English people to the Germans of Pennsylvania. Rev. Dr. Thompson, pastor of the English Reformed church at 50 EARLY FATHERS OF THE REF. CHURCH. Amsterdam, had translated his appeal into English and visited England in its interest. As a result, the English and Scotch raised a fund of $100,000, the king himself giving $5,000 toward the amount. In the memorials to the English people the destitute condition of the Germans was greatly magnified, and fear was expressed lest Pennsylvania might become a German province rather than an English one, and that in the event^of war it might ally itself with the French of Canada against the English. This political reason, as well as pity for the poor Palatines, led the English to open their hearts and purses in this large fund, which was to be devoted to the organization of charity schools among the Germans. The attention of this English society was called to Mr. Schlatter as the person best suited to take charge of their schools in Pennsylvania. So they elected him, and he became the first school superintendent of Penn- sylvania. He, therefore, presented the resignation of his congregation to the Holland fathers. He sailed for Europe, November, 1753, to do so, and returned Sep- tember 28, 1754. The Coetus of 1755, however, still retained him as a member, and requested him to act as Visitor for the Coetus ; and asked, that while attending to his duties as superintendent of the charity schools, he should care for the Reformed. The Reformed were EEV. MICHAEL SCHLATTER. 51 at first kindly disposed to these charity schools, and the Coetus of 1755 recommended Messrs. Otterbein and Stoy as district superintendents. But the Germans, especially through the influence of Mr. Saur, the editor of the paper which circulated most among the Ger- mans, became prejudiced against the scheme because of the reflections it cast on the Germans as being illiterate. The charity scheme ultimately failed, although out of it came finally what afterwards became the University of Pennsylvania. In 1756 a breach occurred between Mr. Schlatter and the Coetus. That Coetus charged him with report- ing to Holland things not mentioned in the acts of the previous Coetus, and even charged him with " what looked like fraud" in making that report. We do not know what the matters referred to were, as the letter referred to is not yet found, but the matter was suffi- cient to cause Mr. Schlatter to leave the Coetus and never to come near it afterward. This was unfortunate in many respects. For it deprived the Coetus of his excellent executive abilities and wonderful energy ; and it also deprived him of the honor he would have had from the Coetus as its founder. Still, after his depart- ure matters moved on peaceably in the Coetus, and there may have been a providence in it after all. 52 EARLY FATHERS OF THE REF. CHURCH. In 1757 Mr. Schlatter was appointed chaplain of the German troops in the British army, who marched against the French in the seige of Louisbnrg and Hali- fax. Bancroft, the historian, speaking of the chaplains of that expedition, said : " There were the chaplains, who preached to the regiments of citizen soldiers, a renewal of the days when Moses with the rod of God in his hand sent Joshua against Amelek." After Mr. Schlatter's return from Nova Scotia he resided at Chest- nut Hill, calling his residence " Sweetland." Here he lived quietly until the American revolution broke out. He seems at times to have preached to the Reformed of that vicinity, who would come together to worship in the church at Barren Hill. Rev. Mr. Muhlenberg says in the Halle Reports : "On Easter Monday, April 12, 1762, Rev. Mr. Schlat- ter also came and had an appointment made after my sermon to administer the holy supper to some Re- formed members. After my sermon Mr. Schlatter yet added a short exhortation, still further impressing upon their hearts what they had heard. After this he went with his church members into the union school house, where he administered the holy supper." Dr. Harbaugh, in his biography of Mr. Schlatter, tells the story that it was customary in those days for the female worshippers at Barren Hill to wear short REV. MICHAEL SCHLATTER. 53 gowns and neat aprons. When Mr. Schlatter preached, as he walked up the aisle to the pulpit, which he always did in a hurried manner, he would suddenly stop, and, without saying a word, seize one of these clean aprons and wipe the dust off his glasses which he carried in his hands. However, this congregation never stood in connection with the Coetus, so that Mr. Schlatter was really an independent Reformed minister for thirty- four years, never attending Coetus in all that time. When the revolution broke out, he sided with the patri- ots. And when the British captured Philadelphia, it placed him in a dangerous position. For he had been chaplain of the British army, and does not seem to have resigned, for he signed himself as British army chap- lain as late as 1762 in a marriage certificate. He was, therefore, soon arrested by the British, taken to Phila- delphia and imprisoned. He was, however, cheered in prison by his daughter Rachel, who would ride into Philadelphia on horseback, bringing provisions for him. The British, during his imprisonment, plundered his house at Chestnut Hill. His daughter Rachel, at the risk of her life, seized the portrait of her father, which was hanging on the wall, snatching it out of the hand of a British soldier who was at the time reaching for it, and carried it away with the fleetness of a deer. The soldiers wantonly destroyed all they could find, 5 54 EARLY FATHERS OF THE REF. CHURCH. burning his valuable papers, strewing feather beds to the winds and throwing his silver into the well. After he was set free from the prison, he returned to Chest- nut Hill. His warm interest for the patriots is shown by the fact that two of his sons were in the American army. The plundering of his house left him compara- tively poor, but he purchased another small home on the road from Chestnut Hill to Barren Hill. Here he quietly spent the eventide of life after the revolution. He was on intimate terms with many of the leading men of Pennsylvania, as Governor Mifflin and General (afterwards Governor) Hiester. Rev. Mr. Muhlen- berg, the founder of the Lutheran Church, remained to his death a warm friend. Mr. Schlatter died October 31, 1790, and was buried (November 4) in the Reformed burying ground at Phila- delphia, which was located where Franklin Square now is. Dr. Harbaugh says : " Directly east of the spark- ling jets, a few feet in from the edge of the circular gravel walk, under the green sod lie Rev. Messrs. Stei- ner and Winkhaus, and Drs. Weyberg and Hendel the aged. Directly north of this spot, about midway between it and Vine street, lies Rev. Michael Schlat- ter. As in the case of the rest, his tombstone was laid upon the grave and covered with a grading." REV. MICHAEL SCHLATTER. 55 So passed away the organizer of the first Coetus. He was a man of medium size, with clearly defined Swiss features. He was always careful about his per- sonal appearance. He was endowed with great energy and devotion, was of an impulsive nature, had fine executive ability, showed excellent scholarship, and exerted a wide influence. The Church in which he was prominent has learned to recognize the greatness and value of his labors. His ten years of activity in our Church have resulted in 150 years of history. What an inspiration to us ! How immortal and eternal is the work we do for Christ ! We may die, it never dies, but lives on for God long after we are gone. " We are building for eternity." VI. REV. JOHN PHILIP LEYDICH. We have in this father an illustration of a life of quiet activity in the Master's work so quiet that he is apt to be overlooked. And yet it is the quiet, average pastor that does the most of God's work in his church. Mr. Leydich's life is also specially interesting to us, because it covers a large part of the history of the Coetus. He came about the beginning of the Coetus (in 1748) and lived until a few years before its close, dying in 1784. He is an illustration of the first long pastorate in the Church, lasting nearly forty years (Boehm being the only one before him, and his pastorate lasted only twenty-three years). But his life is also interesting, because in its events and vicissitudes it reflects the changing scenes of the ordinary Reformed minister of more than a century ago. Mr. Leydich's birthplace is unknown, but the date of his birth is given as April 28, 1715. His literary and theological studies were pursued in Europe, and he was ordained there. But we know almost nothing of him until he appears at Mr. Schlatter's house in REV. JOHN PHILIP LEYDICH. 57 Philadelphia, September 15, 1748, accompanied by his wife and two children. He had been sent over by the Reformed Synod of South Holland at its meeting in Briel, Holland. He had letters of appointment from that Synod, and also letters from the deputies of Hol- land to Rev. Mr. Schlatter, which the latter received, as he says, with heartfelt thanksgiving. So great was the desire among the Reformed people for ministers in those days (because they were so scarce) that sometimes the congregations would lay hold of them as soon as they arrived, and, without waiting for Coetus or any church authority, send calls to them, as was the case later with Rev. Mr. Gros and Mr. Boos. So Mr. Leydich had hardly arrived, and only sufficient time had elapsed for the news to get to Mr. Boehm's home near Philadelphia, when that old patriarch hur- ried to Philadelphia. " On the 19th," says Mr. Schlat- ter, " Rev. Mr. Boahm, with an elder from his congre- gation at Falkner Swamp, came to visit me and begged that Rev. Mr. Leydich might be appointed as regular minister in the above named place and in Providence." Mr. Bcehm, at his advanced age, felt that he could no longer care for these, the two most distant points in his charge. However, as the Coetus was to meet soon, it was determined to let the matter rest until its meeting, but Mr. Leydich preached at both Falkner Swamp and 58 EARLY FATHERS OF THE REF. CHURCH. Providence with great acceptance to the people. On September 29 the second Coetus met at Philadelphia, and Mr. Leydich preached the opening sermon. He took an active part in the Coetus, signing with the rest of his brethren his adherence to the Heidelberg Cate- chism and the Canons of Dort. Coetus approved of his call to Falkner Swamp and Providence, and Mr. Boehm installed him over these congregations, Octo- ber 9, 1748. Here he continued during the rest of his life, for he served only one charge. At one time his name was proposed to the Philadelphia congregation, but he was not elected. Providence wanted him in the country rather than in the city. He had for his neigh- bor and colleague for many years Rev. Dr. Muhlenberg at the Trappe, the patriarch of the Lutheran Church. His life covered so large a part of the history of the Coetus that we find the scenes of his day reflected in his life. The Indian troubles of 1755 did not quite reach his territory, but the charges neighboring to him on the north suffered. But when the revolutionary war broke out, his charge felt its influence very much, as his was one of the border congregations. He was the Reformed minister in whose parish Valley Forge was located. We have somewhere read, but we cannot recall where, just at present, that there was a tradition that one of the Reformed ministers in the neighborhood REV. JOHN PHILIP LEYDICH. 59 of Valley Forge preached to the soldiers in camp. We do not recall who the minister was, but as Leydich was nearest, he may have been the man. We shall be very thankful if any one can correct us and give us the name, if it is not Leydich. Three of his churches we know were used as hospitals during that period the churches at Trappe, East Vincent and Skippack. Rev. J. L. Fluck, in his " History of the Reformed Church of Chester County," says : " The Vincent church was used as a hospital during the pestilence that broke out in Washington's army in camp at Val- ley Forge. It is stated by earlier writers that at that time Valley Forge could be seen from the church. General Washington, whose heart was with his men, frequently visited the hospitals ; and while at this one, his headquarters were at an old log house on the farm within sight of the church. Twenty-two of the sol- diers were buried there, and a monument was erected to them in 1831, one of whose inscriptions runs thus : ' Their names, though lost in earth below, And hence are not recorded here, Are known where lasting pleasures flow, Beyond the reach of death and fear.' ' We have no doubt that Brother Leydich, as a faith- ful pastor and earnest Christian, often visited the hos- pitals, cheering the men with the consolations of our faith. 60 EARLY FATHERS OF THE REF. CHURCH. Colonel Frederick Antes, of Pottstown, one of his members at Falkner Swamp, was a prominent patriot. He was on one occasion almost captured at his home by a British foraging expedition, which seems to have penetrated as far as near Pottstown. But more important than these secular experiences was Rev. Mr. Leydich's religious activity. He was from the beginning very active in the Coetus and very devoted to it. In the early controversy he sided with Weiss against Schlatter. When that difficulty was healed up, no one was more loyal than he. He was the treasurer of the Coetus for a number of years, its president in 1751 and 1760, and its secretary in 1756 and 1768. Year after year, unless prevented by sickness, he was present at its meetings. Statistics often make up a large part of a quiet minister's history and reflect his work, but they are only a small indica- tion of the amount of work performed. In 1760 he reports 102 families, 32 infant baptisms, 13 adult bap- tisms and 28 confirmations. The Holland fathers requested the Coetus to have each year a Visitor appointed, whose duty would be to visit the congregations, and Coetus would appoint one of its prominent members to attend to this duty. Brother Leydich was the Visitor in 1760, and faithfully attended to his duty. But the office was found ini- REV. JOHN PHILIP LEYDICH. 61 practicable and soon given up by the Coetus. In 1763, when the Holland fathers wanted to know how much salary each minister received, he declared that his salary was fifty-two pounds (about $200). He said that if he had to live on that, he would accommodate himself to it and try to live on it. He did not confine his labors to his two congregations, but, with true missionary spirit, started missionary points. He revived the con- gregation at Skippack (which had gone down because of the rupture between Boshm and K-eiff), and he had them erect their church in 1762. He also began ser- vices at Salzburg and Upper Mil ford. He went across the Schuylkill among the German settlers, and held services at Vincent and Coventry. In 1 765 he reported to Coetus that at Providence and Vincent he had 54 families, of which 24 were at Providence and 30 at Vincent ; that he had had 32 baptisms and 21 con- firmations, and had 50 children in the parish schools. In that year he relinquished the congregations at Falk- ner Swamp and Vincent, because of increasing infirmi- ties, to Rev. Mr. Pomp, and kept only Providence and Upper Mil ford, and soon after added Coventry. In 1771 he asked that Upper Milford be taken from his charge and given to young Mr. Steiner, but it did not take place. Increasing infirmities kept him away from the Coetus, and we do not find him present in 1772. 62 EARLY FATHERS OF THE REF. CHURCH. In 1773 he was present and reported that at Pottstown, Providence and Coventry he had 136 families, 56 bap- tisms and 22 confirmations. He was not present at Coetus until 1782 (partly on account of war troubles). He was present in 1783, when he reported for his four congregations Falkner Swamp, Pottstown, Coventry and Trappe 152 families, 29 baptisms and 32 con- firmations. When the next Coetus was held, May 12, 1784, at Lancaster, his absence was noted, together with the note that he had died the previous winter. He thus preached to the last in spite of weakness and age. And although he tried to get rid of some of his congregations during life, they came back to him before death, for he had the same congregations then that he had when he took them thirty-six years before. His people never oeemed to tire of him, and were always glad to have him back or to come back to him. He died January 4, 1784, and is buried in a private bury- ing ground, surrounded by a stone wall, in Frederick township, Montgomery county, Pa. His gravestone bears on it, in addition to his name and age, " 2 Tim- othy 2 : 3. Leidy was a good soldier of Jesus Christ." Dr. Harbaugh tells a beautiful story about him, as follows : " Mrs. Margaret Moser, who died in Mont- gomery county, Pa., aged 104 years, was baptized in her infancy and confirmed, when fourteen years old, by REV. JOHN PHILIP LEYDICH. 63 Mr. Leydich. Paying a visit to this venerable woman on June 14, a short time before her death, we asked her whether she remembered any of the oldest ministers in this country. She remained silent while we repeated the names of quite a number, until we mentioned Ley- dich. At the mention of his name she threw up her head, her eyes brightened, and smiles covered her aged face while she said : ' O yes, Leydich, he was a good man.' " What a testimony to his life and work ! She had been a confirmed member of the Church for ninety years, and she never forgot the minister who confirmed her. And the thing that impressed her most about him was his goodness. We have no doubt that Brother Leydich was a faithful, spiritually-minded minister, a quiet laborer, but one whose reward is great in heaven. VII. KEY. WILLIAM OTTERBEIN. Otterbein's life, more than any other, covers the whole period of the Coetus, 1747 1792. Next to him in length of service seems to have been Waldschmidt and Leydich. Otterbein covered all the time of the Coetus, except five years at its beginning. He was one of the band of six whom Schlatter brought from Hol- land in 1752 Long after they and their successors had passed away, he lived on into the next century, dying in 1813. If, as the Jews believed, old age was a sign of God's blessing, Otterbeiu was wonderfully favored of God. He is the most remarkable case of longevity in the early Coetus. We can, therefore, take his life as covering the whole period of the Coetus. Other prominent Reformed ministers might be men- tioned, whose ministry was important, as Alsentz, Weyberg, Helffeustein, Hendel and Helffrich, but their ministry covers only a part of the time. William Otterbein was born June 3, 1726, at Dil- lenburg, the capital of the county of Nassau-Dillenburg. He came from a family prominent in Reformed Church EEV. WILLIAM OTTERBEIN. 65 history, his father, grandfather and five brothers being Reformed ministers of greater or less prominence. One of them, his older brother, George Gottfried, published an excellent series of sermons on the Heidelberg Cate- chism in 1803. The Otterbein family always stood for Reformed orthodoxy. In 1742 he entered the Univer- sity of the Nassau line of princes, located at Herborn, which Olevianus had founded. In 1748 he was a teacher at Herborn, was ordained in 1749, and became vicar or assistant to the pastor of the Reformed con- gregation at Ockersdorf. But his soul had in it an undeveloped love for missionary work, which impelled him to seek a larger and more difficult field than his native Nassau land. This desire, Dr. Harbaugh says, was nurtured in his mind by his pious mother, who wished him to become a missionary. He yielded to this inclination, and in 1752 joined the missionary baud of six who came with Mr. Schlatter to evangelize this western land. Soon after his arrival in America he was called to Lancaster, and was engaged by that congregation for five years. He entered on his ministry there in Au- gust, 1752. This congregation had had an unprofit- able experience with its previous ministers, Vock, Rie- ger and Schnorr, the latter having been a drunkard. Otterbein, therefore, found it a very difficult field. 66 EARLY FATHERS OF THE REF. CHURCH. Still, his coming so encouraged the congregation that soon after his arrival they replaced, in 1753, the little old wooden church with a massive structure, which stood for a century. Mr. Otterbein's labors imparted to the congregation consolidation and character. But he seems to have tired of his engagement there for five years, and declared at Coetus that he would never again accept an engagement for a stipulated length of time. He was disheartened by the lack of spirituality among the people and by their carelessness about church discipline. So at the end of his engagement to them he wanted to resign, but the people would not listen to it. They were willing to do anything to retain him, and promised to have strict discipline enforced in the congregation. This was agreed to in a paper signed by eighty of the male members of the church, which is still extant. Coetus (1757) therefore urged him to remain and called him " a most excellent pastor/' He therefore remained at Lancaster and established a cus- tom that the pastor should have a personal interview with each communicant before he came to the Lord's supper, a custom which was continued there for seventy- five years. The truth is, that Mr. Otterbein had had a deep religious experience while at Lancaster, which he calls his conversion. This led him to set a higher standard of life and experience among his people. In REV. WILLIAM OTTERBEIN. 67 his home land in Germany the custom of speaking with the communicants before communion was a com- mon one in some Reformed congregations, as is shown by the diary of Prof. Frederick Lampe, pastor at Duis- burg, the most prominent theologian among the Re- formed. The custom was not original with Otterbein ; he simply revived it. Otterbein, therefore, remained a year longer at Lan- caster, but he then resigned with the intention of returning to Europe and visiting his relatives. But the severe winter and the war with France made ocean-trav- elling dangerous, so that he changed his mind and post- poned his trip. He became then temporarily pastor of the Tulpehocken charge, however remaining there a number of years. While there he declined a call to Frederick, Maryland, in 1759. And in 1760 his Tul- pehocken congregation announced to Coetus with joy that he had determined to remain with them longer ; but in 1760 the Frederick congregation renewed its call, and he accepted it, because he felt the isolation of that church, and saw in it a wide field for missionary work, for the congregations in Maryland were in a measure separated from those in Pennsylvania. At Frederick he built a new church, and Coetus says he almost worked himself to death. He remained there for five years. He must have been a very popular 68 EARLY FATHERS OF THE REF. CHURCH. man among the churches, for no man received so many calls from congregations or refused so many. While at Frederick he was called (1761 ) to Reading. Goshen- hoppen, at the Coetns of 1762, declared that if they could get him, they would like to have him. He was called (1763) to Philadelphia, which was then the lead- ing congregation in the Coetus, but he declined them all. In 1765 he accepted a call to York, although the elder from Frederick declared at the Coetus that there was very great need for a minister at Frederick, because of the great number of convicted and awakened sinners there the effect of Mr. Otterbein's earnest preaching. After he left Frederick, the congregation there kept up their own services, even when they had no preacher, for he had trained the spiritually minded ones to hold prayer meetings. His successor there, Lang, was a man of opposite mould. He derided these Pietists, as he called them. And when Otterbein came back to visit Frederick, and was asked by the Pietists to preach, Lang refused to permit him to enter his pulpit and made complaint against him to Coetus. The action which the Coetus of 1767 took was a very summary one. It evidently was not going to discipline a man who was perhaps the most popular of them among the churches, and without doubt the most spiritually- minded among them, except perhaps Hendel. They REV. WILLIAM OTTERBEIN. 69 did not discipline him for being a Pietist, for many of them, perhaps most of them, as Prof. Dubbs says, had in Germany been educated in, and sympathized with, that type of Reformed activity so common among the Reformed of the northern Rhine. Coetus very abruptly ordered Lang to seek some other charge as soon as he could, which he did very soon. So Otterbein was vin- dicated by the Coetus. During his pastorate at York, Otterbein took a trip to Europe, being absent for a year and a half. But so popular was he among his people that they refused to give him up, and their church was supplied by mem- bers of Coetus during his absence. When he landed in Europe, he met his brother, George Godfried, pas- tor at Duisburg. After the first welcome salutation and the evening meal, the brothers retired to the study to unfold their inmost thoughts and their experiences during the past eighteen years since last they were together. William related his spiritual experiences. His brother listened with deepest attention, and, rising from his chair, and tears running down his cheeks, he embraced his American brother, saying : " My dear William, we are one. Blessed be the name of the Lord not only brothers after the flesh, but after the spirit. I have also experienced the same blessing. I can testify that God has power on earth to forgive sins 6 70 EAELY FATHERS OF THE REF. CHURCH. and to cleanse from all unrighteousness." At another time this older brother, while walking with William, said to him : " My dear brother, I have a very strong impression that God has a great work for you to do in America." To do this work, Otterbein returned to America and ministered to the York congregation for three years more. In 1774 he accepted a call to the Second Reformed church of Baltimore. The church at Balti- more had split. Quite a number of its members, dis- satisfied with their minister, Rev. J. C. Faber, who was not a member of the Coetus, and desiring a more earnest preacher, seceded in 1770, and called Mr. Swope, who had been licensed by the Coetus. The Coetus tried again and again to bring the two congre- gations together, but in vain, and finally the Second congregation called Mr. Otterbein. Mr. Otterbein, by his removal to Baltimore, found an immense mission field among the Germans. The lack of Reformed ministers was all the greater, because the Holland fathers declared, in 1773, that Maryland did not fall under their jurisdiction. Besides, all the ministers sent from Holland were captured by the Pennsylvania congregations before they got as far as Maryland. For twenty years the Reformed of Vir- ginia had sent petitions to Coetus for pastors, but had KEV. WILLIAM OTTERBEIN. 71 not received any during that time. The congregation at Frederick had been for a long time an outlying con- gregation, and had a vast mission field connected with it. Mr. Steiner, Mr. Otterbein's predecessor, declared that to go round his charge required a journey of 300 miles, and he said that in one year he travelled nearly 3,000 miles. Thus Mr. Otterbein found not only a wide field north of him in Maryland, but a vast field south of him in Virginia. Many of the preaching points had no churches, so that meetings were held at first in barns or in the open air. Out of this grew a great religious awakening, which began about 1770, or later. This movement seems to have been under the control and guidance of the Reformed ministers, all of them in that neighborhood, except the pastor of the First Reformed congregation of Baltimore, and Rev. Mr. Faber at Taneytown, entering into it. This movement was finally organized at Antietam, May 29, 1774, when Otterbein and Swope organized classes or praying cir- cles. The next meeting was held at Pipe Creek, June 12, 1775, when other Reformed ministers were present, as Heuop of Frederick and Weimer of Ha- gerstown. From York came Rev. Mr. Wagner, one of the most faithful Reformed ministers, and even from Tulpehocken, Pa., came Rev. Mr. Hendel, the most 72 EARLY FATHERS OF THE REF. CHURCH. spiritually-minded of them all. They met again in Maryland, October 15, 1775. On June 2 and Octo- ber 2, 1776, they held meetings. At these meetings they heard reports from the praying circle in the churches and organized new circles. Whether other meetings were held later, we do now know.* They did not dream of such a movement being un-Reformed, for in the northern Rhine region such prayer circles are quite common in the Reformed congregations. The Reformed district of Siegen to-day is quite full of such meetings. And we once came nearly attending a cate- chism prayer meeting at Barmen, which we accidentally missed, much to our disappointment. Such move- ments were Reformed from the beginning. During all this time Mr. Otterbein continued active in the Coetus, as well as in the missionary field. His ministry at Baltimore continued for thirty-six years. There he was greatly honored, and exerted quite a wide influence, not only over the German Reformed, but on other denominations. He was called upon to aid in the ordination of Bishop Asbury of the Metho- dist Church. After a blessed ministry, from whose active labors he seems to have retired somewhat during the last few * For a full report of these meetings see Prof. Dubbs' in Reforme4 Quarterly Review, January, 1884. REV. WILLIAM OTTERBELN. 73 years, Rev. Mr. Otterbein was called to his reward, October 17, 1813. The venerable Rev. Dr. Kurtz, of the Lutheran Church, attended him on his deathbed. After Dr. Kurtz had prayed, the dying saint said, like Simeon : " Lord, now lettest Thou Thy servant depart in peace." Later he uttered his last words : " Jesus, Jesus, I die, but Thou livest ; and soon I shall live with Thee. The conflict is over. I begin to feel an unspeakable fulness of divine love and peace. Lay my head on my pillow and be still." It hardly comes within the scope of this article to enter into the relation of Mr. Otterbein to the United Brethren Church, which claims him as its founder and first minister, as that occurred after the time of the Coetus, whose sesqui-centennial we are celebrating. One thing, however, is very certain, that during the days of the Coetus, up to 1791, there is not a whisper that Mr. Otterbein did not belong to the Reformed Church. We believe Dr. Harbaugh, in the " Fathers of the Reformed Church," and Prof. Dubbs, in the " Reformed Quarterly Review," January, 1884, have proved that he never left the Reformed Church. Dur- ing the days of the Coetus there was no one who stood higher among the Reformed or was more devoted to the Coetus than he. He was its president in 1757 and 1766. He rarely missed a meeting, and was absent 74 EARLY FATHERS OF THE REF. CHURCH. only a few times without sending an excuse. His absence was often caused by his distance from the place of meeting. He was present at the last meeting of the Coetus in 1791. Dr. Harbaugh is right when he says, over against the United Brethren, that no minister stood better and labored more regularly in the Re- formed Church than Otterbein. We would, however, call attention to three things which may bear on this subject, and which are revealed during his connection with the Coetus, all of which would unfit him to become a United Brethren : 1. He was Calvinistic. He signed not merely the Heidelberg Catechism, but also the Canons of Dort in 1752. He was educated at Herborn, where Lampe's Federal Theology was taught. He was, therefore, theologically unfit for the United Brethren, who were Arminians, and not Calvinists. It is to be remem- bered that in those days the distinctions between Cal- vinists and Arminians was much more closely drawn than now. 2. He was strict in his catechization, while the United Brethren have ridiculed that method. 3. He was not possessed of a loud voice suited for noisy meetings. The congregation at Philadelphia, when it called him, found some of its members opposed to him because of his weak voice. He seems to have REV. WILLIAM OTTERBEIN. 75 been quiet in his manner, very different from those who organized finally the United Brethren Church. Such was the long and honored life of one who claimed to be Reformed up to the time of his death. Stahlschmidt, in his book, "A Pilgrimage by Land and Sea," pays a fine compliment to Otterbein, whom he met in 1773. He says : " He is a very gentle and friendly man, and on account of his devout and pious course of life is known and highly respected through- out the whole land." Otterbein was a tower of strength for the Reformed, especially for spirituality and missionary zeal in those days of coldness and missionary destitution. He exerted a blessed influence on the Coetus, and has left a blessed memory behind him in the Church which he loved. Reformed Church Books. The best books of Reformed Church History tell- ing the story why our forefathers came to this western world and founded our Church. These books will ac- quaint our people with our inspiring Church History. "Origin of the Reformed Church of Germany," $1.50. " History of the Reformed Church of Germany," $1.75. Origin and History, $2.75. Commentary on Heidelberg Catechism. The best Commentary on the Heidelberg Catechism ever published in German, by Rev. O. Theleman, trans- lated by Prof. M. Peters, a volume of over 450 pages. Suggestive, spiritual, practical, helpful. Price, $1.50. Send orders to REV. JAMES I. GOOD, D. D., Reading, Pa. Presbyterian and Reformed Review. The quarterly for October, 1897, will contain an article entitled " The German Reformed Coetus (1 747 1792)," by Rev. James I. Good, D. D. This is the best theological Review published in America. Its editor is Rev. Prof. B. B. Warfield, I). D., and among its associate editors are Profs. Van Home and Good of the Reformed Church. Price, $3.00 per year ; 80c. per single copy. 6.6 University of California SOUTHERN REGIONAL LIBRARY FACILITY 405 Hilgard Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90024-1388 Return this material to the library from which it was borrowed. SRLF 2 WEEK THI 01993 UC SOUTHERN REGIONAL LIBRARY FACILITY A 001 022 240 4 Sout Lib.