REESE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA. Class i~-'' T\ THE LATE PROFESSOR JOHANN BAUSCHINGER (See Appendix A. Frontispiece. THE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. A TREATISE FOR ENGINEERS ON THE STRENGTH OF ENGINEERING MATERIALS. J. B. JOHNSON, O.E., Professor of Civil Engineering in Washington University, St. Louis, Mo. ; Member of the Institution of Civil Engineers ; Member of the American Society of Civil Engineers ; Member of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers ; Corresponding Member of the American Insti- tute of Architects ; Member of the International Association for the Standardizing of Methods of Testing Materials; etc., etc. , FIRST EDITION. FIRST THOUSAND. NEW YORK: JOHN WILEY & SONS. LONDON: CHAPMAN & HALL, LIMITED. 1897. <\0 Copyright, 1897, BY J. B. JOHNSON. ROBERT DRUMMOND, ELECTROTYPER AND PRINTER, NEW YORK. PREFACE. THE rational designing of any kind of construction involves a knowledge of The external forces to be resisted, transformed, or transmitted; The internal stresses resulting therefrom; The mechanical properties of the materials to be employed to accomplish the objects sought. Of these three coordinate departments of knowledge the first two are founded on the sciences of mathematics -and applied mechanics. The last one, however, does not rest on any deductive science, as this information can only be gained by patient, expensive, and competent research. For this reason the third essential named above has not kept pace with the other two kinds of engineering science; but, on the other hand, it furnishes very much greater rewards to the skilled investigator. During the past twenty-five years the number of such investigators has increased from a scattering few to hundreds and even thousands, and these are now found in all enlightened nations. The results of their original studies and experiments are pouring in upon us from all countries, in many languages; and no practising engineer can hope to even scan, much less to appropriate and assimilate, more than a very small part of this vast wealth of experimental knowledge.* In the following work the author presents to his readers a condensed and concise summary of such portions of the knowledge now available on this subject as he has found suitable for such a work. He is fully aware of its incompleteness and of its more or less fragmentary character. Yet with all its faults he believes it contains sufficient reliable information, not commonly accessible elsewhere, to justify its .publication in this form. * The author has one list of original contributions to the subject of the Strength of Materials filling 140 quarto pages. Ill iv PEEFACE. When the work is used as a text-book in schools of engineering the instructor would do well to assign only such portions of Part I as are required to supplement the student's course in applied mechanics; to have his students read Part II if they do not get this information in other ways; to dwell longer and with more care on Part III; and to call attention only to such portions of Part IV as pertains to the particular course the students are taking. In this way the hook may be made intelligent and familiar to the student, and so become to him a great and lasting aid in designing, testing, and inspecting, without requiring more time than can be devoted to the subject. This course should precede or accompany an experimental course in the testing laboratory, with which all American schools of engineering are now equipped. An unusual use has been made of stress-diagrams and other forms of graphical representation of facts and laws, no pains or expense having been spared in this direction. So far as possible tables have been omitted and the original tabular data have been incorporated in diagrams. A law of relation- ship cannot be perceived from data arranged in a tabular form. When plotted to significant arguments the law not only becomes evident at a glance, but when once impressed on the mind through the sense of sight it cannot well be forgotten. To obtain this lasting benefit, however, ttr diagram must be intelligently read and understood. The reader is urged, therefore, to give great care to the study of all the diagrams which accom- pany the text on any subject, for, as a rule, the facts, laws, and conclusions to be drawn from them are not fully expressed in the text. The diagrams must be considered as a part of the text, and they should be read with even greater care than is bestowed on the word- embodied ideas. Throughout the book, with few exceptions, both in the diagrams and in the text, the English units of weight and measure (pound and inch) have been employed. The author is of the opinion that until the metric system has been definitely adopted it is best to use the old unit >, and that a double system of units is confusing. The revising of books to put them in harmony with the decimal system will be but a very small part of the total expense entailed by the formal adoption of that system by our Government. As a very large part of the data given in the diagrams comes from Continental sources, all of which were expressed in the metric system, a great amount of labor was required to bring this material into the English system of units. Even the results obtained from English sources were generally expressed in long tons per square inch, so that this also required reduction to bring it to pounds per square inch. Some of the author's usages may be regarded as unwarranted innova- tions. Especially may this be the case in the matter of the new elastic limit, which he proposes for general adoption, and which is discussed in Arts. 13, 261, 262, and 263. The author bespeaks for these articles a careful consid- eration and also a study of the many stress-diagrams scattered through the book, before his views are condemned. The fact is, something must be done PREFACE. V in this matter, as now no one knows what is meant by " elastic limit " with- out an explanation which explanation is not usually given. The relatively large space given to the subject of timber is not more than its importance as a structural material, and the general absence of scientific information on the subject would seem to demand. Probably the reason little has been given on this subject hitherto, in such works as this, is because little has been known. Until the Forestry Division of the U. S. Agricul- tural Department began the systematic study of timber and timber-trees, some five or six years ago, very little accurate or scientific information was obtainable as to the mechanical and other properties of American timber. The author's intimate connection with these investigations is a further reason why he should here present an adequate account of the work done to date.* It has been no part of the author's aim to give working rules for using materials in structures of various kinds, or to propose original specifications to be used in the purchase of materials. He has tried to impart a knowl- edge of the properties of materials; on what these depend; the ordinary causes of variation and defects, and how these should be discovered; thus making the reader competent to draw his own specifications and to make his own rules. The latest forms of investigation of metals and building-stones by means of the microscope are briefly treated (the former in Appendix B) ; and a chapter has been given on the magnetic properties of iron and steel, and the methods to be employed in determining these. This chapter need be read by electrical students only. The author has acknowledged his sources of information in the text, and especially in the legends accompanying the cuts. In addition to these he desires to make a special acknowledgment here of his obligation to Pro- fessors Bauschinger, Tetmajer, and Martens; to the French Commission Report; and to Mr. Henry M. Howe, Prof. Thomas Turner, Mr. G-. R. Redgrave, Prof. J. Q. Arnold, Mr. Thos. Andrews, Mr. H. H. Campbell, and to Dr. B. E. Fernow. His thanks are also due to Dr. Wm. Trelease for assistance in obtaining illustrations of American trees in Chap. XIII; to Mr. II. A. Wheeler, E.M., for the chapter on the manufacture of paving- brick; to Mr. W. A. Layman, M.S., for the chapter on the magnetic prop- erties of iron and steel; and to Prof. H. Aug. Hunicke, E.M., for revising the manuscript of Chapters VII to XI inclusive. There are to-day a few exceptionally fertile sources of exact information on subjects pertaining to the materials of construction, prominent among which may be named : 1. The annual publications of the Results of Tests made at the U. S. Arsenal, Watertown, Mass., beginning in 1882. * The author has had entire charge of the mechanical tests, some 40,000 of which have "been made in his laboratory at St. Louis. Vl PREFACE. 2. Bauschinger's Communications from the Laboratory of the Technical School at Munich, Germany. 3. Tetmajer's Communications from the Laboratory of the University at Zurich, Switzerland. 4. Martens' Communications from the Laboratory of the University of Berlin, Germany. 5. The Report of the French Commission (of 115 members) on the Standardization of Tests of the Materials of Construction, in four quarto volumes, 1895. 6. The Monthly Journal, Baumateridlenkunde, published in Zurich, as the organ of the International Society for the Standardization of the Tests of Materials of Construction. The entire engineering profession is so indebted to the late Prof. Johann Bauschinger for the work he has done in developing the scientific testing of materials that the author of this work has chosen to express his feeling of gratitude to him by using his portrait as a frontispiece and giving a brief account of his life in Appendix A. That this work may contribute somewhat towards more rational, safe, and economic practices in the designing of all kinds of construction has been the purpose and is now the hope of THE AUTHOR. ST. Louis, Mo., Jan. 1897. TABLE OF CONTENTS. PART I. SYNOPSIS OF THE PRINCIPLES OF MECHANICS UNDER- LYING THE LAWS OF THE STRENGTH OF MATERIALS. CHAPTER I. GENERAL NATURE OF DEFORMATION AND STRESS. PAGE Elastic and Plastic Bodies Stress and Deformation Proportionality of Stress and Deformation inside the Elastic Limits Kinds of Deformation and Stress Longitudinal and Lateral Deformation under Direct Stress Angular Defor- mation under Direct Stress Relation between Shearing and Direct Stresses Shearing Modulus of Elasticity .* 1 CHAPTER II. MATERIALS UNDER TENSILE STRESS. General Phenomena accompanying Tensile Tests Significant Results of Tensile Tests True Elastic Limit Apparent Elastic Limit Ultimate Strength Percentage of Elongation Reduction of Area of Cross-section 10 CHAPTER III. MATERIALS UNDER COMPRESSIVE STRESS. Two Classes of Engineering Materials Crushing Strength of Plastic or Viscous Materials Crushing Strength of Brittle Materials Relation . of Crushing Strength tc Shearing Strength Crushing Strength of Prisms' Relative Strength of Prisms and Cubes Loading on a Portion of Cross-section only- General Laws of Crushing Strength Strength of Columns Weakening Effects of Eccentric Loading 24 vii Till TABLE OF CONTENTS. CHAPTER IV. MATERIALS UNDER SHEARING STRESS. PAGE Two Manifestations of Shearing Stress Moment of Torsion Shearing Deforma- tions 38 CHAPTER V. MATERIALS UNDER CROSS-BENDING STRESS. Historical Sketch Fundamental Equations of Equilibrium Moment of Resistance and Stress on Extreme Fibre Resistance of Beams of Various Forms of Cross-section Resistance of Beams beyond their Elastic Limits Distribution of Stress and Position of Neutral Axis at Rupture Moduli of Rupture in Cross-breaking Distribution of Shearing Stress in a Beam Wooden Beams in Shearing and Cross-bending Deflection of Beams General Formulae Various Cases analyzed Table of Moments, Stresses, and Deflections Deflection from Shearing Forces Determination of Young's Modulus of Elasticity Rational Designing of Flitched Beams Steel and Concrete in Combination Flat Plates computed approximately ". . . 42 CHAPTER VI. THE RESILIENCE OF MATERIALS. Resilience defined Varieties of A Measure of Shock-resistance Impact Stresses Resilience Areas in Stress-diagram's Resilience in Direct Stress In Cross- bending In Torsion Comparative Table 75 PART II. MANUFACTURE AND GENERAL PROPERTIES OF THE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. CHAPTER VII. CAST IRON. General Classification of Iron and Steel Physical Properties of Cast Iron Carbon in Silicon in Remarkable Effects of Silicon Sulphur, Phosphorus, and Manganese in Grading Pig Iron Foundry Practice The Cupola Kernel t- ing Moulds Moulding Sand Size and Shape Shrinkage Mechanical Properties Hardness Strength in Compression, Tension, and Cross-bending Malleable Cast Iron Method of Manufacture Mechanical Properties 87 TABLE OF CONTENTS. ix CHAPTER VIII. WROUGHT IRON. Methods of Manufacture The Puddling- Process Oxidation in Puddling Muck Bars Reheating and Rolling Repeated Reheatings Imperfections in Fin- ished Product Mechanical Properties Crystalline Fracture Welding Effect of Reduction in the Rolls on the Strength ; 117 CHAPTER IX. STEEL. Methods of Manufacture Crucible Process Bessemer Process Open-hearth Proc- essBasic and Acid Processes Comparison of Bessemer and Open-hearth Processes Molecular Structure of Wrought Iron and Steel Structure as affected by Heat Treatment Mechanical Qualities of Steel Commercial Classification Quality as determined by Chemical Composition Influence of Carbon on Iron Three States of Carbon in Iron Change in the Carbon at a Low Yellow Heat Hardening and Tempering Effects of Carbon on the Mechanical Qualities On Tensile Strength On Ductility On Compres- sive Strength Effects of Silicon Of Manganese Manganese Steel Of Sulphur Red -shortness Sulphide of Iron Dangerous Of Phosphorus On Ductility On Strength Hardening Tempering Annealing Corrosion. . , 133 CHAPTER X. THE MINOR OR AUXILIARY METALS OF CONSTRUCTION AND THEIR ALLOYS. Copper Zinc Tin Aluminum Nature of Metallic Alloys Copper-zinc-tin Alloys The Brasses The Bronzes Alloyed Aluminum Aluminum in Steel Fusible Alloys 172 CHAPTER XL LIME, CEMENT, MORTAR, AND CONCRETE. Quick, or Fat, Lime Hardening of Lime-mortar Hydraulic Lime Natural Cement Portland Cement Historical Account of Ingredients of The Clay Silica and its Compounds Alumina Sulphur Compounds Chemical Reactions in the Furnace Chemical and Physical Changes in Setting and Hardening Slag-cements Sources of Raw Materials for Portland Cement Processes used in Pulverizing and Mixing Processes used in Burning- Grinding the Clinker. 181 CHAPTER XII. THE MANUFACTURE OF VITRIFIED PAVING-BRICK. Definition of Clays employed Physical Properties of Clays Preparation of the Clays Moulding Drying and Burning Annealing Sorting 196 X TABLE OF CONTENTS. CHAPTER XIII. TIMBER. PAGE Structure and Appearance Classes of Trees Sapwood and Heartwood Annual Rings Spring and Summer Wood Anatomical Structure of Broad leaved Trees Minute Structure Grains of Wood Color and Odor Resonance Weight a Function of Structure and Moisture Variation of Weight in Single Trunk and in Species Moisture Distribution Drying Timber Shrinkage explained Effects of Shrinkage Amount of Shrinkage Mechanical Proper- ties Stiffness Strength as a Beam In Tension and Compression In Shearing Influence of Weight and Moisture on Strength Hardness Cleavability Flexibility Toughness Practical Conclusions Chemical Properties and Technological Products Wood as a Fuel Charcoal Prod- ucts of Wood-distillation Durability and Decay All Decay produced by a Fungus-growth Prevention of Decay Structure as a Key to Identification of Species A Structural Key to Species Characteristic Structural Features Use of the Key Descriptive List of the More Important Trees in the U. S., with Illustrations of Leaf and Fruit. . , .205 PAKT III. TESTING-MACHINES AND METHODS OF TESTING MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. CHAPTER XIV. MECHANICAL TESTS IN GENERAL. General Observations Tests Classified Testing-machines Effect of Rate of Load- ing Significant Limits of Deformation All Absolute Elastic Limits unsatisfactory The " Apparent Elastic Limit" 302 CHAPTER XV. TENSION TESTS. Significance of Tension Tests Selection of Test Specimens Preparation of Speci- mens Standard Dimension of Tension-test Specimens Tetmajer's Analysis of the Elongation Time Function of Tension Tests Tension-test Machines Gripping Devices Special Machines The Emery Testing-machine fully Described Exteusometers Autographic Diagram Apparatus Gauging Im- plements 312 TABLE OF CONTENTS. XI CHAPTER XVI. COMPRESSION TESTS. PAGtt Objects of Compression-test Specimens Bedding the Specimen in the Machine Compressometers Column Tests Strength of Column the same as its Apparent Elastic Limit Considered Results Tetmajer's Results Formulae for Strength of Columns Spring Testing-machines 353 CHAPTER XVII. CROSS-BENDING TESTS. Object of Essential Conditions of Deflection measured in Testing Cast Iron- Modulus of Rupture Modulus of Elasticity Impact-testing Machines 369 CHAPTER XVIII. IMPACT AND HARDNESS TESTS. Object of Impact Tests Essential Conditions of Energy of the Blow Hardness Denned Test of Permanency of Form The Rodman Punch Standardized Test for Permanency of Substance Turner's Apparatus 375 CHAPTER XIX. SHEARING AND TORSION TESTS. Essential Conditions of Shearing Tests Occurrence of Shearing Stress in Practice Shearing-test Appliances Torsion Tests Torsion-testing Machines 385 CHAPTER XX. COLD BENDING AND DRIFTING TESTS. Significance of Cold-bending Tests Methods of making them Results of Cold- bending and Tension Tests compared Effects of Punching and Drilling developed by Cold-bending Tests Combined Specified Requirements in Tension and Cold-bending Results of Tension, Cold-bending, and Impact Tests compared Drifting Tests standardized 394 CHAPTER XXI. THE TESTING OF CEMENT. Standard Scientific Tests of Cement Test of Fineness Significance of Fineness- Thoroughness of Burning tested by Specific-gravity Test Apparatus for Rate of Setting Automatic Apparatus for Registering Vicat's Needle xii TABLE OF CONTENTS. PAGE Tests for Soundness The Boiling Test Tests of Strength Fixed Relation between. Tensile and Coin press! ve Strength Standard Consistency of Neat- cement Briquettes Ell'ects of Varying Percentages of Water Normal or Standard Sand Effect of using Different Sands Consistency of Standard Mortar, 1 C : 3 S Formation of the Briquettes Form of the Briquette A New Form proposed Distribution of Stress over tlie Minimum Section The Clips Cement testing Machines Eccentricity of Briquette in Clips Cross- breaking Tests Standard Tests of Adhesion Normal Variations of Volume of Cement mortars in Air and in "Water Recommendations of the French Commission for testing Permanency of Volume Test of Permeability of Cement-mortar Test for Decomposing Action of Sea-water 407 CHAPTER XXII. TESTS OF THE STRENGTH OF STONE AND BRICK. Crushing Tests of Stone Tests for Paving-brick The Cross-breaking Test The Crushing Test The Rattler Test Standardized Standard Tests of Com- mittee of the National Association of Brick Manufacturers 456 CHAPTER XXIII. TESTS OF THE STRENGTH OF TIMBER. Important Deductions from the U. S. Timber Tests Description of the U. S. Timber Tests Mechanical Tests Cross-bending Test Crushing-endwise Tests Crushing across Grain Shearing Tension 462 PART. IV. THE MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION AS REVEALED BY ACTUAL TESTS. CHAPTER XXIV. THE STRENGTH OF CAST IRON. Tensile Strength Composition and Strength of High-grade Cast Iron Compres- sive Strength Cross-breaking Strength Modulus of Elasticity Kirkaldy's Results Shrinkage Stresses Strength Increased by Impacts Pipes and Columns 469 CHAPTER XXV. THE STRENGTH OF WROUGHT IRON. Strength with the Grain Strength' across the Grain Time Function Compressive Strength Shearing Strength Effect of Stressing beyond the Elastic Limit Strength of Chains '. 482 TABLE OF CONTENTS. xiii CHAPTER XXVI. THE STRENGTH OF STEEL. PAGE Tensile and Compressive Strength Effect of Varying Percentages of Carbon Effect of Thickness Effect of Finishing at n Low Red Heat Effects of An- nealing on Low-carbon Steel Tests of Sleel by Punching Quenching and .Annealing Billet Tests Characteristic of Final Rolled Forms Elongation and Reduction Compressive Strength same as the Elastic Limit Elastic Limit in Compression for Various Kinds of Contact Areas of Contact be- tween Wheels and Rails Moduli of Elasticity in Tension and Compression Annealing Effects after Overstressiug Effects of Varying Lengths of Reduced Section Nickel Steel Effects of Forging and Rolling Steel- welded Tubes I Beams and Plate Girders Effects of Stressing beyond the Elastic Limit Shearing Strength Fiictional Resistance of Riveted Joints Friction per Square Inch of Rivet Section Bearing Resistance of Plates Tensile Strength of Grooved Plates Injurious Effects of Punching and Shearing Influence of Form of Thread on Strength of Screw-bolts Steel Specifications 490 CHAPTER XXVII. THE FATIGUE OF METALS. Fatigue Defined Micro-flaws in Steel Wohler's Fatigue Tests Limits of Stress for an Indefinite Number of Repetitious A New Universal Formula for Dimensioning 537 CHAPTER XXVIII. STRENGTH OF THE COPPER-ZINC-TIN ALLOYS. Strength of Copper Annealing Copper Wires and Plates Strength of Brass Strength of Bronze Special Bronzes 548 CHAPTER XXIX. THE EFFECTS OF TEMPERATURE ON THE MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF METALS. Effects on the Strength of Iron and Steel The Change in the Elastic Limit Change in the Modulus of Elasticity Effect on Resistance to Impact- Effects on Copper and Bronze 557 CHAPTER XXX. RESULTS OF TESTS ON CEMENTS, CEMENT-MORTARS, AND CONCRETES. Strength of Natural Cements Strength of Portland Cements Modulus of Elas- ticity of Cement-mortars Strength of Sand cement Mortars Variation of xiv TABLE OF CONTENTS. PAGE Strength with Increasing Proportions of Sand Variation of Strength of Mortars with Varying Size of Sand-grains Relative Economy of Coarse and Fine Sand-grains Experiments with Sands of Artificial Grauulometric Com- positionPorosity of Mortars as Affected by Size of Sand-grains Effect of Long Storage on the Strength of Cement Effect of Regaugiug after Set begins Effect of Carbonic-acid Gas on the Hardening of Cement-mortars Adhesive Strength of Cement-mortars Compressive Strength and Elasticity of Cement and Concrete Strength and Economy of Cement-mortars and Concretes Filtration through Concrete Effects of Freezing on Cement-mor- tars and Concretes Anti-freezing Mixtures Concrete Mixtures Concrete Structures in Sea-water Fire-resisting Qualities of Concretes Properties of Cinder-concrete Mixtures Cinder-concrete with Expanded Metal Base 568 CHAPTER XXXI. RESULTS OF TESTS ON STONE AND BRICK. The Building-stonesWeathering of Building-stones Freezing Tests The Sul- phate-of-soda Test Chemical Tests Microscopic Tests The Absorption Test The Specific-gravity Test Compressive Strength Table of Physical Qualities of American Building-stones Elastic Properties and Crushing Strength, with Stress-diagrams Bauschinger's Results Resistance to Abra- sion Bauschinger's Abrasion Tests and Results Strength and Elastic Prop- erties of Brick and Brick Piers, with Stress-diagrams Results of Tests of Paving-brick Results of Tests on Building-brick 630 CHAPTER XXXII. EXPERIMENTAL VALUES OF THE STRENGTH OF TIMBER. The Mechanical Tests of the U. S. Timber Investigations List of Species Tested Ultimate Ends of the Investigation The Moisture Factor Tables of Results on Thirty-two Species Special Investigations Relation between Strength and Weight The Factor of Safety Table of Safe Loads on Beams- Strength of Wooden Columns How to distinguish between Short-leaf and Long- leaf Pine Lumber Geographical Distribution of Southern Pines Holding Force of Nails 664 CHAPTER XXXIII. STRENGTH OF IRON AND STEEL WIRE AND WIRE ROPE. The Strength of Wire Strength of Steel-wire Rope Methods of Testing the Strength of Wire Ropes Shop Tests of Wire The Albert-lay Rope 691 TABLE OF CONTENTS. XV CHAPTER XXXIV. THE MAGNETIC TESTING OF IRON AND STEEL. PAGE Magnetic Properties defined Hysteresis Measurement of Permeability Induc- tive Methods Traction Methods Measurement of Hysteresis Results of Tests Development due to Testing Conditions affecting Magnetic Quality Importance of Magnetic Testing Useful Data on Conductivity 702 APPENDICES. A. BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH OP PROF. JOHANN BAUSCHINQER 723 B. STUDY OF IRON AND STEEL BY MICROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS 725 C. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE RESOLUTIONS OF THE CONVENTIONS, OF THE FRENCH COMMISSION, AND THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS 737 D. STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR IRON AND STEEL.. 756 THE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. PART I. SYNOPSIS OF THE PRINCIPLES OF MECHANICS UNDERLYING THE LAWS OF THE STRENGTH OF MATERIALS* CHAPTER I. GENERAL NATURE OF DEFORMATION AND STRESS. 1. Elastic and Plastic Bodies. An elastic body is one which, when deformed under the application of an external force, will recover its origi- nal dimensions when the deforming force has been removed. A plastic body is one which will not recover its original dimensions after deforma- tion. A body which will fully recover its original dimensions after defor- mation is said to be perfectly elastic. When it will only partially recover its original dimensions after deformation it is said to be partially elastic, and to the extent of its failure to recover its original form it may be said to be plastic. All solid bodies are nearly or quite perfectly elastic up to a certain limit of deformation, beyond which they become partly elastic and partly plastic. This limit within which the body is nearly or quite perfectly elastic is called the elastic limit. When deformed beyond this limit the body will recover a portion of such deformation, the rest remaining as a permanent change or set. Beyond the elastic limit, therefore, a body may be said to be partly elastic and partly plastic. Practically all the materials used in engineering design may be said to be perfectly elastic within certain limits; and as these elastic limits are well beyond the limit of maximum loading in * This Part is intended to be supplementary to the matter contained in text-books on applied mechanics, rather than to replace such courses. 2 THE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. practice, it is customary to regard all engineering materials as perfectly elastic for all practical purposes. 2. Stress and Deformation. The deformation which a solid body suffers on the application of an external force has commonly been called strain, but in this work it will be designated deformation simply.* The deforma- tion which is fully recoverable on the removal of the external force may be called the elastic deformation. That which remains as a permanent set after the external force has been removed may be called the plastic defor- mation. Within t.he elastic limit the deformation is wholly elastic. The relative deformation is the proportionate distortion, or the linear change divided by the original length or dimension in the direction of the deforming force. Thus if a bar 10 inches long be stretched 0.01 inch, then this 0.01 inch is the deformation, and the relative deformation is 0.01 divided by 10, or 0.001 main. Thus the actual deformation is a concrete quantity, and is measured in units of length, while the relative deformation is an abstract number, and may be defined as the ratio of the distortion to the original length. This relative or proportionate deformation may also be defined as the deformation per unit of length. Stress may be defined as the resistance a solid body offers to the defor- mation produced in it by the action of an external force, and it may also be defined as the resistance to this external force directly. Under the law that action and reaction are equal, the stress must be quantitatively equal to the external force, and it may be regarded as resisting this external force, or these two may be regarded as being in equilibrium. Since the application of an external force to a solid body, however, is always accom- panied by a deformation of that body, and since this deformation disap- pears on the removal of the external force, the internal stress in the body may be said to be developed as a resistance to this deformation, and in this sense the deformation may be regarded as the immediate cause of the stress, the ultimate cause being the external force. 3. Proportionality of Stress and Deformation Inside the Elastic Limit. Within the limits of perfect elasticity of solid bodies the deformation is directly proportional to the external force producing that change of form; and since the internal stress is of necessity equal to the external force, we arrive at this important proposition : Inside the elastic limit the stress is directly proportional to the deformation ivhich accompanies it.\ This * The word strain is used in common language in several other senses, so that its use in this specific scientific sense, though warranted, is of doubtful propriety. The author has so used it, however, in his previous works. f This law was first announced by Robert Hooke in 1676, in the form of an anagram, as " The true theory of elasticity or springiness ceiiinosssttuv." Two years later the key to this anagram was given in the Latin phrase "Ut tensio sic vis," a free rendering of which would be, "As the extension so is the strength." This law of proportion- ality, therefore, between the stress and the deformation within the elastic limit is fre- quently referred to as Hooke's Law. GENERAL NATURE OF DEFORMATION AND STRESS. 3 proposition may be stated in another way by saying that inside the elastic limit the stress per unit area divided by the proportional deformation is a constant for any particular solid body. Since this constant is the ratio of the deforming force to the accompanying deformation of any particular solid body, it is evidently an important function, and it has therefore been given a name. The name of this ratio is the modulus of elasticity. We have, therefore, Modulus of elasticity = E = -= -. -, . . . . (1) deformation wherein by stress is meant stress in pounds per square inch, and by defor- mation is meant a proportionate change, or the deformation per unit of length. Thus if an external pull, P, be applied to a bar whose cross-section p is A y then the unit stress is ; and if the length of the bar be I, and its actual extension under the application of this external force be a, then the deformation, or proportionate distortion, would be y, whence we should have t a Aa a"* 7 wherein p is the stress in pounds per square inch. Thus if the external force of 60,000 pounds be applied to a bar whose length is 10 inches and whose cross-section is 2 square inches, and if the extension under this load be 0.01 inch, we should have That is to say, such a material would have a modulus of elasticity of 30,000,000; and this is about the average value of the modulus of elasticity of steel. Example. If steel rails be welded together at a temperature of 80 F., what will be the total tensile stress in an 80-pound rail at a temperature of 20 below zero, and what will be the compressive stress in this rail at a temperature of 140 F., the coefficient of expansion being assumed as 0.0000065 per degree F.? In solving such a problem as this, since the length of the rail cannot change for a change of temperature, the contraction which would occur if free to move is overcome by the application of a sufficient external force coming from the surrounding bodies to prevent this contraction. In other words, an external force is developed just sufficient to stretch the body as much as it would contract under a fall of temperature, and similarly an external force is exerted to compress the body as much as it would expand under a 4 THE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. rise of temperature. We have then only to determine the amount of the contraction or expansion from temperature and call this the deformation produced by the application of an external force, and then by the aid of the modulus of elasticity find the amount of this external force, and divide it by the area of the cross-section of the rail, thus obtaining the internal stress in pounds per square inch. The cross-section of the rail is indicated by its weight. The weight of rails is always given in pounds per yard, and it so happens that a bar of iron or steel one inch square and 36 inches long weighs just ten pounds. This unit is called an inch-yard. Therefore an 80-pound rail has just eight inches of cross-section. With the above information the student is prepared to solve the problem. It is evident that the length need not be considered; or any length may be chosen, as, for instance, one inch, since only the proportionate change of length need be considered in either case. The answers to the problem are 156,000 pounds total stress in tension at the lower temperature and 93,600 pounds total stress in compression at the upper temperature, the stress per square inch being 19,500 pounds in tension and 11,700 pounds in compression, respectively. Since the elastic limit in both tension and compression of this grade of steel is about 45,000 pounds per square inch, it is evident that these stresses are well within these elastic limits, and hence no injury to the rail would ensue from the prevention of expansion and contraction in this manner. 4. Different Kinds of Deformation and Stress. Under the application of suitable external forces there are commonly recognized five kinds of defor- mation, namely: Extension, Compression, Angular, Bending, and Twisting; and corresponding with these are five kinds of stress, namely: Tensile, Compressive, Shearing, Bending, and Tortional. The last two kinds of stress are really combinations of the other three. Thus, bending stress may be resolved into tension and compression, with or without shearing, and a tortional stress is a particular kind of shearing stress. For any particular kind of material there is a definite relation between these several deforma- tions and their corresponding stresses. The numerical values of the ratios of these corresponding deformations and stresses are the moduli of elasticity in the several cases. It so happens, however, that the modulus of elasticity. or the ratio between the stress and the deformation in tension, is usually the same as it is in compression. Both tension and compression are called direct stresses, and hence we may in general speak of the modulus of elasticity in direct stress, and the modulus of elasticity in shearing, in cross-bending, and in torsion. Since cross-bending distortion gives rise mostly to distortion in extension and compression, and their corresponding stresses, the modulus of elasticity in cross-bending may also be said to be the same as that in direct stress. The modulus of elasticity, therefore, which is used in tension, compres- sion, and cross -bending, is one and the same, and is sometimes spoken of as Young's modulus. That is to say, it is the ratio between direct stress in GENERAL NATURE OF DEFORMATION AND STRESS. 5 pounds per square inch and the corresponding proportionate linear defor- mation. 5. Longitudinal and Lateral Deformation under Direct Stress. The lon- gitudinal deformation of a solid body in the direction of the deforming force is A/, where I is the original length in this direction and A is the proportion- ate deformation. Hence we may write, for Young's modulus, _ stress per unit area _ p deformation per unit length A* ^ ' It is a fact of observation that when a metal body is elongated by an exter- nal force from ltol-\-\l (inside the elastic limit), it contracts laterally about one fourth of its proportionate elongation. Hence if the original diameter were d, its diameter after stretching would be d -d. This ratio of lateral 4) to longitudinal deformation., under longitudinal external forces, is called Poisson's ratio. It is usually taken as J- for all metals, but for india-rubber it is J. The true values of this ratio, for some of the more common mate- rials, are : * Glass .... 0.2451 Steel .... 0.2686 Copper . . . 0.3270 Brass 0.3275 Delta-metal .... 0.3399 Lead 0.4282 6. Change of Volume under Direct Stress. If the length of the body is incfeased by \l, and its lateral dimensions are decreased by jAfZ, the new volume for a rectangular bar having lateral dimensions of b and d would be But the original volume was Ibd, hence the change of volume is Ibd- 2 and the relative change is Ibd divided by the original volume = -, or the * & volume has been increased by one half as great a percentage as the length was increased. If we should now apply an equal direct tension in the direction of b, we would increase this dimension by A#, and the volume by -J,bd 9 and similarly for a tensile force in the direction of d. Hence for a direct tensile force in * Taken from Wertheim and given in the Report of the French Commission des MetJtodes d'Essai des Materiaux de Construction, 1895, vol. in. p. 6. f Since A is very small as compared to unity. The product of (I -f- m)(l -f- ri)(l -f- p), etc., where m, n, and p are very small fractions, is I -f- (m + n -f p), since the products of the auxiliary terms can be neglected. G THE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. all three planes the volume would be increased by |A times its original vol- ume, and each dimension by -J/\ times its original measure. For a compressive force in all directions the volume would be diminished to (1 | A,) times its original volume, and each lineal dimension to (1 JA) times its original measure.. The volumetric change of a solid body for an equal stress applied in all directions is therefore f of the change of the dimension in the direction of an equal simple longitudinal stress. Thus the longitudinal proportionate deformation for a direct stress of p pounds per square inch is A, or -But since the relative volumetric change for stress in all directions is f A, we have as the ratio between volumetric stress and deformation under an equal stress in all directions, as a fluid pressure for instance, whence = E. That is to say, the volumetric modulus of elasticity of a solid body for an equal stress in all directions is f of Young's modulus, which applies only to direct stress in one plane and its accompanying deformation.* 7. Angular Deformation under Direct Stress. We will here consider one case only of angular deformation under direct stress, and that is for equal di- rect stresses of opposite signs on planes at right angles to each other, as shown in Fig. 1. If the original length of each side of this cube be /, then the dimension in the direction of l^ will be increased as much by the action of the vertical compression V as it will be diminished by the action of the hori- zontal tension H, since V = H in pounds per square inch. Also the cube will be shortened in the direction / 3 by an amount XI due to the force * This statement applies only to bodies in which Poisson's ratio is . Since this ratio is very nearly for india-rubber, it follows that the cross-section is reduced as much as the length is increased, under a tensile stress m one plane, and hence the volume remains unchanged. Similarly, for a compressive stress in all directions the volume is unchanged (almost); so that while Young's modulus of elasticity for this material is very small, the volumetric modulus is very great: and if Poisson's ratio were quite \, the volumetric modulus would be infinite, or it would tje quite incompressible. It is probably the most incompressible of any known substance. GENERAL NATURE OF DEFORMATION AND STRESS. 7 V, and by J- this amount due to the lateral force H. Also the dimension in the direction , will be elongated by A from the action of the horizontal force H, and by this amount from the force F. Hence the final dimen- sions in these directions will be 1(1 |A) and 1(1 -j- H) respectively. If in the front face of this cube the lines ABGD be drawn, joining the middle points of the edges before deformation, this figure is a square. After deformation, if we make the point at A common to the two figures, we have the points B, C, and D moved to B', C', and D' respectively. This produces an angular movement of one of these lines equal to the angle BAB' , which we will call 6. This is now one half the deviation of the angles B'AD', B'C'D', AB'C', and AD' Q' from right angles. But since BG GB f = J(J A/), we may assume that B' falls on BC, since is very small. Also, BB' ,, . .BG tan = = (from similar triangles) r-=, = * . ' = f A. -?>(/ Or, since 6 is small, we may say, 6 = f A, where is given as arc in terms of the radius as unity. But 8 = J the deviation of the angles AB'C', B'C'D', etc., from right angles. Hence we have 20 = angular change = 2(f A) ...... (5) equals twice the linear deformation. That is to say, two direct stresses at right angles to each other and of opposite signs produce in the plane of the stresses an angulnr deformation equal to twice the proportionate linear deformation. This result will be used in Art. 9 in obtaining the ratio of the modulus of elasticity in shearing to that in direct stress. 8. Relation between Shearing and Direct Stresses. In Fig. 2 let the square ABGD represent a very small portion of a longitudinal section of a body, taken in the plane of the forces. Assume also that there are shearing forces acting on the body, which have developed at this point in this plane a shearing stress on the vertical sides / equal to s, pounds per square inch, these forming a couple and producing a turning moment. Evidently this particle can only be held from turning in this plane by the development of an exactly equal shearing stress (or resistance) on the horizontal faces, which will give an opposing couple and moment of resistance equal to the turning moment of the origina. shearing s, 8 THE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. forces. If the lengths of these sides be equal, we shall then have s a = s 1 ir pounds per square inch. Hence we may say: A shearing stress in one direction at any point in a body develops an equal opposing shearing stress at right angles to it in the plane of the resultant external forces. But the two sets of shearing forces indicated in the figure will tend to deform the body by elongating it in the direction BD, and shortening it in the direction AC. The internal resistance to such a deformation develops in the body a direct tensile stress or resistance along the line A C and a compressive stress along the line BD. If S l = $ 2 represent the total shearing stresses on the vertical and hori- zontal sides of this particle, respectively (s, and *, being equal intensities of stress, or stress in pounds per square inch), then we may resolve these along the diagonals and obtain total tensile stress on AC = Vs* + S 9 * = Vs'33* + 8 = sAC= T = total compressive stress on BD S? -j- S* = (?, or these two direct stresses also are equal. But the stress per square inch is the total stress divided by the area over which it acts; hence AVC have for the intensities of the tensile and compressive stresses Hence we have the larger conclusion that A shearing stress in one direction at any point in a body develops an equal opposing shearing stress at right angles to it in the plane of the exter- nal forces, and these opposing shearing stresses produce two opposing direct stresses 'acting at 45 with the shearing stresses and at right angles to each other, these tensile and compressive stresses having the same intensities, in pounds per square inch, as the original shearing stress. 9. The Shearing Modulus of Elasticity. The modulus of elasticity in shearing may be defined as the ratio of the shearing stress in pounds per square inch to the accompanying angular deformation. By angular deformation is here meant the angular change, as derived in Art. 7, where 20 is a pure ratio, being the ratio of arc to radius. From the last article we know that a shearing stress gives rise to direct stresses at right angles to each other, of opposite signs, but of equal intensities; and when such stresses act, we learned in Art. 8 that the proportionate angular change was twice the proportionate linear change when equal direct stresses were acting at right angles to each other. But when both of these stresses were acting we found the linear change to be f A, or f that due only to the deforming GENERAL NATURE OF DEFORMATION AND STRESS. 9 force in that direction; and, as found in equation (5), 20 2(fl), we have 26 = f A. But E = Young's modulus of elasticity j-, o and E 8 shearing modulus of elasticity ~^ _ shearing stress per square inch angular deformation But we have shown, when s = p, 20 = f A,; hence we have That is to say, E s = \E, or ^e shearing modulus of elasticity = f of the linear or Young's modulus.* * This conclusion is based on a value of Poisson's ratio of . The general relation between E s and E is E s = h = - r~\^ where m is the reciprocal of Poisson's ratio. Z'J ,i 771 -f- 1 Thus if this ratio be i, which it is approximately for brass and copper, then m = 3 and E s = %E, while for india-rubber, where m = 2, we have E s = ^E. Prof. Bauschiuger's tests on round bars of steel give E s = 13,600,000, while for square bars of the same s material he found E s = 11,500,000, thus showing a failure of the theory to harmonize results on these two forms of cross-section even inside the elastic limit. See Rep. French Commission, vol. m. p. 208, for Bauschinger's results. CHAPTER II. MATERIALS UNDER TENSILE STRESS. 10. General Phenomena accompanying Tensile Tests. When a body of uniform cross-section is subjected to the action of an external force which tends to pull it asunder, it is elongated in the direction of this force by a proportionate amount equal to the average force per square inch divided by its modulus of elasticity; thus A = the proportionate elongation = ^, where p is the external force, or internal stress, in pounds per square inch, and E is the modulus of elasticity (Young's modulus). At the same time its lateral dimensions are reduced by one fourth as great a percentage as that which represents the proportionate elongation, as described in Art. 5. This rate of elongation in the direction of the force, and contraction in its transverse dimensions, continues in strict proportion to the amount of the external force, until the elastic limit is reached, when both the longitudinal elongation and the transverse contraction begin to increase at a more rapid rate, until finally, with the more ductile metals, the condition of perfect plasticity or viscosity is reached, and the body elongates under a constant force, while the lateral dimensions reduce more and more, until rupture finally occurs. If the external force or load, in pounds per square inch, be represented by vertical ordinates, and the corresponding elongations be represented by horizontal abscissae, then the action of the specimen under test may be indicated by what is known as a stress-diagram, the vertical coordinates representing stress, and the horizontal coordinates the corresponding defor- mations. In Fig. 3 such stress-diagrams are shown for timber, ca3t iron, wrought iron, and steel. These lie on the upper side of the horizontal axis. If the same materials were to be subjected to compressive external forces, corresponding stress-diagrams might be drawn in opposite direc- tions, that is to say, downward and to the left, as indicated in Fig. 3, below the horizontal axis. In a complete stress-diagram of a ductile metal there are four signifi- cant points which need to be noted. These are: the true elastic limit, the apparent elastic limit, the ultimate strength, and the breaking-point* 10 MATERIALS UNDER TENSILE STRESS. 11 These four significant points in a tension stress-diagram are indicated by the letters A, B, C, and D in Fig. 4, where the same diagram is drawn to widely different horizontal scales. Thus the point A is the true elastic limit, or the ratio of the stress to the deformation is a constant from the origin to this point. This requires that the stress-diagram should be a perfectly straight line from to A. Beyond the elastic limit, or above A, the deformation sometimes increases somewhat more rapidly than it did belew A, and the locus then becomes somewhat curved from A to B. At B a very marked change occurs in the FIG. 3. Typical Stress-diagrams of Timber, Cast Iron, Wrought Iron., and Steel in Tension and Compression, drawn to the same scales. specimen in the case of wrought iron and structural steel. If the test be continued slowly at this point, it will be found with the more ductile metals that the specimen elongates a considerable amount under a nearly constant load, as shown in the diagram, from B to B' . This point is called the " apparent elastic limit," or the " yield-point " or the " breaking- down point." In ordinary commercial testing of. iron and steel this point is always called the " elastic limit;" and the true elastic limit, or the point A, is not found. This results from the rapid and somewhat crude methods 12 THE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. used in making commercial tests, and the author of this work has some- times called this " apparent elastic limit " the " commercial elastic limit," since it is the so-called " elastic limit " found in practically all the tests made by American inspection bureaus and rolling-mills. Since this yield - point has been so long regarded as the "elastic limit," whereas the point A is the true elastic limit, persons who wish to be accurate and at the same SCALE FOR MAGNIFIED DEFORMATION 005 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 JO* 15* 20# DEFORMATION FIG. 4. 25% time to be understood find difficulty in conveying their meaning.* The terms "yield-point" and "breaking-down point" are not in common use, while the term " elastic limit " is commonly misused. In the present state of knowledge on the subject, therefore, the terms " true elastic limit " and " apparent elastic limit " probably would best describe the points A and B respectively.! It has been the practice of the author, in making tests to be used commercially, to call the point B the " elastic limit," without any explanation or exception, when he desired his results to be comparable with those made elsewhere for commercial purposes. Just what happens to the specimen at the point B is well shown on Plate I, I which is a reproduction of a photograph of specimens of polished * Fortunately, in the case of soft, or structural, steel these true points are practically identical, so that in this material no such distinction of terms as is here proposed are necessary. See Figs. 5, 6, 7, and 8. f The French Commission use this term " apparent elastic limit " for the point B. j The author has not seen elsewhere as clear indications of the action of such ma- terials M the ."yield-point." The tests shown on Plate I were made by him and photo- graphed in March, 1892. The bars were polished to a mirror surface before testing. These photographs were exhibited at the Engineering headquarters at the World's Fair, hicago, 1893, and while they were much observed and studied, it did not appear that ^ny one had ever seen such clear " breaking-down " indications before. The significant fact is that these effects come instantly, as to any particular marking, and that they sue- PLATE I. PHOTOGRAPHS OF A POLISHED STEEL BAR, 1 IN. x 2 IN., AFTER BENDING AND AFTER PULLING, SHOWING THE " BREAKING DOWN " OF THE METAL. The tensile test was interrupted before the breaking-down action had extended entirely throughout the length of the bar. (Tested and photographed by the author, 1892.) MATERIALS UNDER TENSILE STRESS. steel subjected respectively to a uniform bending moment and to a tensile stress. This photographic reproduction shows how the tension specimen fails or " breaks down " its molecular arrangement in detail by shearing on inclined sections, beginning at the end of the specimen where it was held a/si 0.S0M- /.00 FIG. 5. Autographic Stress- diagrams of Mild Steel, taken simultaneously with the Gray Exteusometer Apparatus. Time, %^ minutes. by the grips. The breaking down proceeded from the ends towards the centre. In this case the test was stopped before it had reached the middle portion. This central portion, therefore, is in its original or normal con- dition, while the remaining portions have been broken down in an irregular ceed each other regularly along the bar, like the formation of ice-crystals on freezing water. The markings on the tension bar, or on the tension side of a beam, are depres- sions, while on a compression bar, or on the" compression side of a beam, they are swellings. 14 THE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. weblike pattern. If the test had been continued, this action would have gone on from the ends towards the centre, until the entire specimen had yielded in this manner; and when this breaking-down action had developed over the entire length o| the specimen, the point B' in the diagram would have been reached. This breaking-down action, therefore, all occurs over 40000 340001 20,000 v/rr/ 'MT/CW at as 0.3 FIG. 6. Typical Stress-diagram of Mild Steel, plotted to two scales. (From records of Tests of Metals, Wat. Ars., 1886.) the entire length of the specimen between the points B and B', and the reason why B stands above B' seems to be that it requires a greater force to start this breaking-down action than is necessary to continue it and extend it throughout the length of the specimen after it has once been started. See Figs. 5, 6, 7, and 8. In Figs. 7 and 8 the true elastic limit is well above the yielding resistance of the metal, or the point A is above B. MATERIALS UNDER TENSILE STRESS. 15 PlG. 7. Tensiou Tests of Wrought-iron Shafts 1 in. in diam., used for endurance testSc Average ultimate strength = 50,400 Ibs. per sq. in.; average elongation 27$ on a length of 11 diameters. ( Wat. Ars. Rep., 1890.) 16 THE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. After this breaking-down action has extended over the entire length of the specimen, a further increase in the load will continue to stretch the specimen nearly uniformly throughout its length, with a uniform reduction in cross-section, until at last thf elongation and reduction continue under a constant load. That is to say, the stress-diagram becomes horizontal at the point C, Fig. 4. This marks the load under which the material is perfectly plastic or viscous, or for which the distortion continues with no increase of load. MATERIALS UNDER TENSILE STRESS. 17 After passing the point C the specimen begins to show the marked reduction of cross-section at a particular point, which will ultimately be the plane of rupture. This action is indicated in Fig. 10. As soon as this "necking-down" begins, the elongation continues under a diminishing load, as shown by the dropping of the locus in the stress-diagram, and the remaining portion of the elongation of the specimen nearly all occurs in this immediate vicinity. The area of cross-section becomes less and less, until at rupture it is perhaps less than half the original area, as shown in Fig. 10. 11. The Significant Results of a Tensile Test. There are five signifi- cant results of a tensile test, namely: The Modulus of Elasticity; The Elastic Limit; The Ultimate Strength; The Percentage of Elongation; The Reduction of Area of Cross-section. The Modulus of Elasticity is found by dividing any stress per square inch below the elastic limit by the corresponding proportionate deforma- tion. Since the stress-diagram is a straight line from the origin to the elastic-limit point, any point on this portion of the locus may be selected for the determination of the modulus of elasticity. For instance, if the point which represents an elongation of 0.1 of one per cent be chosen, the deformation being 0.001 (see Fig. 6), the modulus of elasticity is found at once by multiplying the corresponding stress in pounds per square inch by 1000.* In other words, the modulus of elasticity is the tangent of the angle which that portion of the stress-diagram below the elastic limit forms with the horizontal axis when the two coordinates are properly evaluated by the vertical and horizontal scales respectively. It is a very remarkable fact that the modulus of elasticity of all grades of wrought iron and rolled steel, from the softest up to the highest grade of spring steel, is nearly constant, and has a value from 29,000,000 to 30,000,000, being perhaps always within the limits of 27,000,000 and 31,000,000 pounds per square inch. The ultimate strength of these metals varies from about 45,000 to several hundred thousand pounds per square inch for the strongest steel wire; but through this range of variation of strength the ratio of the stress to the corresponding deformation re- mains nearly constant. The modulus of elasticity is, therefore, a very valuable quality of such materials and one which is made great use of in * If the diagram is not straight to this point (has its elastic limit below this point), then draw a tangent to the diagram at the origin, aud note where it ciits the ordinate marking a deformation of 0.001, aud this stress multiplied by 1000 is the modulus of elasticity. This modulus can be read off in this manner from any of the stress dia- grams for tension and compression found in this work. 18 THE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. engineering design. It may be called the modulus of stiffness, since it is a direct measure of the rigidity of a body, or an inverse measure of its flexi- bility.* 12. The True Elastic Limit is, in general, from 50 to 70 per cent of the ulti- mate strength of the material, while the apparent elastic limit is from GO to 70 per cent of the ultimate strength of the material. The apparent elastic limit, or the breaking-down point, is also the ultimate strength for practical purposes, since almost all materials lose their value in structural designs after they have been deformed beyond this limit. The true elastic limit may be defined either as the deformation where permanent set begins, or as a point beyond which a given increment of load produces a greater increment of deformation, which is the point where the ratio of the stress to the deformation ceases to be a constant and begins to diminish. This is also the upper extremity of the straight portion of the stress-diagram. If a material like wrought iron or structural steel be loaded beyond its true elastic limit, and even beyond its yield-point, and the load removed, the material has been permanently elongated; but if it again be subjected to a load, it will be found to be perfectly elastic up to the limit of its previous loading. In other words, its elastic limit has been raised to the value of its previous loading. In this way the elastic limit can be raised practically up to the ultimate strength. When the term " elastic limit " is used in a scientific sense without modification, the true or primitive elastic limit (point A, Fig. 4) is always to be understood; but when used in a com- mercial sense, the apparent elastic limit or yield-point (point B) is to be taken. As stated previously, the elastic limit is usually found in commercial testing by noting the action of the weighing-beam in dropping under an increasing stretch, this being in fact the breaking-down point. To determine the true elastic limit it is necessary to use very delicate measuring appli- ances, which will enable the observer to discover when the ratio of stress to deformation has begun to change. Even when using such devices the readings must be plotted to a large scale to detect the deviation from a straight line. 13. " The Apparent Elastic Limit" is defined by the French Commission as " the load per square millimeter of the original section, where the defor- mation begins to increase sensibly with no increase in the external force applied (corresponding to the dropping of the beam in testing-machines)."! Since in most kinds of materials there is no such point other than the ulti- * A modulus of flexibility would be the reciprocal of the modulus of elasticity, or . IL but Prof. A. B. W. Kennedy has taken for such a modulus of "specific extension" the stretch in thousandths of an inch on a length of 10 inches under a stress of 1000 Ibs. per sq. in. Its reciprocal multiplied by 10,000,000 is the modulus of elasticity, f Report of the French Commission, vol. i. p. 207. MATERIALS UNDER TENSILE STRESS. 19 mate strength, and since in these materials an elastic limit corresponding to sensible deformations is required for practical purposes, the author proposes to extend the meaning of this term so as to make it applicable to all elastic materials, and at the same time to make it serve as the " elastic limit " to be universally used in all kinds of practical tests. For this purpose he employs the following definition : The apparent elastic limit is the 2wint on the stress-diagram of any material, in any kind of test, at which the rate of deformation is fifty per cent greater than it is at the origin* This point is found either by comparing increments of deformation with given increments of load, or better by plotting the stress-diagram and draw- ing a tangent to it which has an inclination to the vertical 50 per cent greater than has the tangent to the diagram at the origin, as shown in Fig. 9. To /V 0.. l/M. T / 'M O N &'5 ft A/-C \ F IG . 9. Stress- diagram of Hard-drawn Steel Wire. ( Wat. Ars. Hep., 1890.) do this lay off the tangent to the curve at the origin (or inside the true elastic limit, where it is a straight line), and then fix a point on any hori- zontal line of the paper, 50 per cent farther from the vertical axis than the point where this tangent cuts it. Lay a parallel ruler on this point and the origin, and move it till it becomes tangent to the curve and draw the tan- * This definition should not be made to apply, however, to materials not perfectly elastic within any limits. Thus certain stones and concretes have stress-diagrams which are reversed curves, their rates of deformation being greater at first than after they are heavily loaded, and any load produces a permanent set, as shown in Chapter XXXI. Here the modulus of elasticity is different for every increment of load, and no kind of "elastic limit" can be attributed to them. That is to say, they are not perfectly elastic for any load however small. 20 THE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. gent line. Then fix the point of tangency by the eye, and call this the apparent elastic limit.*' This fixes a point which in all cases corresponds to an extremely small permanent deformation. In Fig. 9 the permanent deformation at this limit, for hard-drawn steel wire, is about 0.0003 of the length, or T fg- of one per cent, while the limit so fixed is some 22,000 Ibs. per sq. in. above the true elastic limit. Although this test was made at the U. S. Arsenal at AVatertown, Mass., and on the Emery testing-machine, with extreme accu- racy, as shown by the accordance of the results when plotted to the large scale in Fig. 9, yet the " elastic limit " as set down in the published record (which " elastic limit " is supposed to be the " true elastic limit ") lies some 8000 Ibs. per sq. in. higher than the " apparent elastic limit " fixed by the rule here laid down! This same state of affairs is shown in numberless cases in the recorded results of tests made at this the most fruitful and accurate labo- ratory in the world. f While, therefore, objection would be quickly raised to the criterion herein proposed for fixing an " apparent elastic limit-" in so arbitrary a manner, and apparently so far beyond the " true elastic limit," yet no one would be inclined to question the records of the U. S. Watertown Arsenal tests, in the fixing of a "true elastic limit," even though this should in nearly all cases lie beyond this conventional "apparent limit "! After a great deal of thought and research given to this subject, the author believes no better criterion can be found for fixing a practical " elastic limit" which will be one and the same limit for a given material in the hands of all ex- perimenters, and on all machines. For all materials which have a definite " yield-point " this " apparent elastic limit," determined as here described, will agree with it exactly; but for such materials it would never be deter- mined in this manner, since it is then so much more readily found by the " drop of the beam," or even by a pair of dividers set to given marks on the specimen. For all materials which have no point of "yielding under a fixed load" at this stage of the test, this criterion would always accomplish the following results : 1. It would always fix one and the same well-defined point. 2. This point would always correspond to so small a permanent defor- mation as to be, for all practical purposes, the true elastic limit. 3. It is equally applicable to all materials which have an elastic field. 4. It is equally applicable to all kinds of tests, whether on specimens or on finished members or structures, where deformations of any kind can be correctly measured. While the 50 per cent increase in the rate of deformation is purely arbi- *The author has done this in his U. S. timber tests since 1891, calling this point in his cross-bending stress-diagrams "the relative elastic limit." f See other instances in records selected therefrom for this work in Chapters XXV and XXVI. MATERIALS UNDER TENSILE STRESS. 21 trary, it is not large enough to fix a point having an appreciable permanent set, but it is large enough to fix a well defined point on the stress-diagram. A very extended experience in its application, therefore, serves but to con- firm the author in its continued use, and in the recommendation of its gen- eral adoption which is here put forth for the first time. * 14. The Ultimate Strength of a specimen subjected to tensile stress is. measured by the maximum load carried, and is indicated on the stress- diagram by the true maximum point in that curve. It is found by dividing^ the maximum breaking load by the original area of cross-section. In case of the more plastic metals, the area of the broken section is usually about one half the original area, so that the ultimate strength of the actual section at rupture when found by dividing the breaking load by the final area of this section would be about twice the ultimate strength as computed on the original section. That is to say, the drawing down and pulling out of the metal has nearly doubled its strength per square inch. The term " ultimate strength" however, ahvays refers to the original section, and is found bij dividing the maximum load by the original section. 15. The Percentage of Elongation is found by dividing the increase of length after rupture has occurred, by the original length. By original length is meant a certain portion of the specimen which has been reduced to a uniform cross-section before testing. A standard length for tensile-' test specimens in America and in England is eight inches, while in Germany and France it is twenty centimeters, these standard lengths being practically identical. The elongation of a test specimen of the plastic metals may be divided into two portions: (a) that part of the elongation which is uniformly distributed over the section; (I)) that part of the elongation which occurs in the vicinity of the section which finally breaks. Thus in Fig. 10 are shown four sets of test specimens of mild steel, there being three specimens in each set. All the specimens of one set were originally of the length indicated by the untested specimen which stands on the left side of each group. The specimen next adjoining it on the right has been stretched to the limit of the elongation indicated in (a) above, or until there is an indication of a local reduction of area. The right-hand specimen in each group shows the local elongation and reduc- tion, but the specimen has been removed from the testing-machine before rupture occurred. The middle specimen of each group has been tested to- the ultimate strength of the material, since, when the specimen begins to- reduce locally, the ultimate strength has been passed, and the strain-diagram begins to fall, or it is developed under a diminishing load. By the amount, therefore, that the right-hand specimen in each of these groups is longer than the middle specimen of the group, by so much has the length been increased by the local drawing out on the section where failure will finally occur. The first elongation, therefore, is that portion which is uniformly distributed over the specimen, and the second is that * See also Arts. 261, 262, and 263, pages 306-311. THE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. MATERIALS UNDER TENSILE STRESS. 23 which is concentrated in the vicinity of the final failure. Both of these elongations are, however, measured and included in the total elongation, from which the percentage of elongation is determined. The total elonga- tion is obtained after rupture has occurred, by placing the two ends together and measuring the distance between the primitive gauge-marks. In the case of specimens having shoulders at their ends the gauge-marks should be at least one-half inch inside of the shoulder, since the metal adjacent to the shoulder does not elongate fully, because of the strengthening effect of the enlarged cross-sections at the ends. It will at once be apparent from a study of these specimens that the (1} elongation, or that which is locally developed in the vicinity of final rupture, is nearly the same in all these specimens; whereas the (a) elonga- tion, or that which is uniformly distributed over the specimen, is always directly proportional to the length. The total elongation, therefore, will not be proportional to the length. In other words, the percentage of total elongation will be greater for the short specimen than for the long ones. This shows the necessity of using standard lengths of these specimens when the percentage of elongation is to be found. The percentage of elongation is the result which indicates the ductility of the material, this being one of the most important qualities of the metals used in structural designing. 16. The Reduction of Area of Cross-section is found by determining the area of the broken cross-section, subtracting this from the original area of cross-section, and dividing the difference by the original area. This is not, so important an indication or result as the others described above, but it is customary to determine it, and to add it to the record. For the ductile metals this reduction of area may be as much as from fifty to sixty per cent, of the original cross-section. CHAPTER III. MATERIALS UNDER COMPRESSIVE STRESS. 17. Two Classes of Engineering Materials. Engineering materials may be divided into two general classes, according to their manner of failure in compression. Plastic or viscous materials are those which will flow without showing any other indication of failure under a sufficient compressive load. Brittle or comminuible materials are those which will crush to a pow- der, or crumble to pieces, or fail by shearing on definite angles under a compressive load. In the former class are such materials as wrought iron, soft and medium steel, the alloys, lead, copper, zinc, and the like. Of the latter class are cast iron, hard or tempered steel, brick, stone, cement, etc. The laws of failure of these two classes are very different, and they will, therefore, have to be discussed separately. 18. Crushing Strength of Plastic or Viscous Materials. There is no such thing as an "ultimate strength "in compression of a plastic body. There is, however, a definite "apparent elastic limit," the same as in ten- sion. Beyond this limit the material simply spreads, and increases the area of its cross-section indefinitely under an increasing load, as shown in Plate II. The elastic limit in compression of such a material is the greatest load from which the specimen will fully recover, or it is the greatest load within which the stress and deformation bear a constant ratio to each other. This elastic limit in compression for wrought iron and steel is, fortunately, about the same in pounds per square inch as the elastic limit in tension. It is not customary, therefore, to test such materials in compression, but to assume that they have the same elastic limit in compression which they are found to have in tension. 19. The Law Governing the Strength in Compression of a Brittle or Com- minuible Material. Experiments show that all such materials when sub- jected to a compressive load fail by shearing on certain definite angles. The resistance to movement along these angles is made up of two parts: first, the strength of the material to resist shearing; and second, the frictional resistance to motion along this plane. The sum of these two resistances must equal the shearing component of the load imposed when 24 PLATE II. Wrought Iron. Steel. Wrought Iron. Steel. Steel. Wrought Iron. Wrought Iron. Steel. RELATIVE MALLEABILITY OP WROUGHT IRON AND SOFT STEEL. All the specimens were originally of the shape of the one remaining umleformed. The wrought iron specimens uniformly show large cracks. (From von Tetmajcr's Com- munications, vol. iv, PI. V. N MATERIALS UNDER COMPRESSIVE STRESS. resolved along the shearing plane. To find what this angle should be, we may equate the two resistances here described with the shear- ing force, and find the angle of rupture, the determining condition being that this angle shall be that which offers the least total resistance to failure under a crushing load. This angle may be found in the following manner: Let s = shearing strength of the material per square inch; A = area of prism = 1 square inch; 6 = angle of rupture; p = crushing load per square inch. The tendency to slide on the plane of rupture is p sin 0. The resistance to sliding is s sec -\- fp cos 0, where /is the coefficient of friction = tan 0, where = angle of re- pose. Hence, at failure, p sin = s sec -\-fp cos 0. . . . FIG. 11. (1) It is evident that the angle of rupture will be such as to cause failure under the least load; hence if be taken as the independent variable, we shall have at rupture j- = - s (cos 2 - sin 2 -f 2f sin cos 0) = 0, ,,-r cos'" sin 2 ' ~ 2 sin cos cos sin 20 = - cot 20. , . . (2) Whence, since/ = tan 0, we have tan = - cot 20 = tan (90 - 20) = tan (20 - 90), or = 20-90 and = - ^- = 45 + ^. . . . (3) That is to say, the angle of rupture is 45 plus one lialf the angle of repose. If the friction had been omitted, we should have had p sin = s sec 0; whence -L = s(cos a sin 2 0) = 0; l-2sin 2 = 0; 2 sin 1 = 1, or = 45. . . . (4) It has been customary to neglect the friction, and to state that the plants of rupture make this angle of 45 with the horizontal;* but the actual plane of rupture, when the specimen has sufficient height, is about * Coulomb is responsible for this -theory, while Navier has given the true analysis. Most writers, including Rankine, have followed Coulomb, however. 26 THE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. 55 with the horizontal, or 35 from the direction of the applied load. See Figs. 12 and 13, showing tests on sandstone made by Prof. Bauschinger.) Mr. Charles Bouton has shown* that the theoretical angle of rupture is FIG. 12. Bausehinger's Compression Tests oil Sandstone. borne out in practice with many kinds of materials. (See Fig. 14 for photographic views of crushed specimens of cast-iron cylinders of various- heights, showing angle of rupture.) The following table gives the results of Mr. Bouton's determinations of the theoretical and the actual values of this angle: * In u thesis for the degree M.S. at Washington University, 1891, entitled Theory and Experiments on the Laws of Crushing Strength of Short Prisms. Mr. Bouton also de- rived the formulae in this article and afterwards found that Navier had anticipated him. MATERIALS UNDER COMPRESSIVE STRESS. 27 Observed Observed Theoretical Number Angle Angle Angle Material. of Experi- of Rupture. of Repose. of Rupture. th Differences. ments. * 45- + | 41 F " cast irou 24 54. 8 0.2 20. 6 55. 3 - 0.5 " C. W." cast iron 24 55 .0 .2 16 .9 53 .4 + 1 .6 Limestone 4 62.2 33 .4 61 .7 -f .5 Asphiilt paving mixture "Milwaukee brick 3 4 59.7 58.2 27 .3 27 .0 58 .6 58 .5 + 1 .1 0.3 FIG. 13. Bauschinger's Compression Tests on Sandstone. 28 THE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. The u F." cast iron was good foundry iron, having a tensile strength of 22,000 pounds per square inch and a modulus of elasticity of 14,500,000; the " C. W." iron was car-wheel iron, having a tensile strength of 20,000 FIG. 14. Bouton's Compression Tests on Cast Iron. pounds per square inch and a modulus of elasticity of 6,500,000, or less than one half of the former. 20. Relation of Crushing Strength to Shearing Strength. To show the relation of the crushing strength to the shearing strength, we have, from equation (1) in the previous article, s = ;?(sin 6 cos 6 also, from equation (2), ' 0); ~ cos 2^ cos 2 sin 7 9 j __ nQr v 7 __ sin 26 2 sin 6 cos 6 Substituting this value of/, we find _ p cos _ (5) MATERIALS UNDER COMPRESSIVE STRESS. 29 or p = 2s tan 0, .......... /g\ where p = compressive strength in pounds per square inch, arid s = shearing strength in pounds per square inch. This relation was also shown by Mr. Bouton to be well borne out in practice. The great trouble to prove such a relation is to find s experi- mentally on brittle materials without introducing bending stresses (See Art. 37.) 21. Relation of Crushing Strength to Relative Dimensions of Specimen. _ This is a very important matter. Hitherto nearly all crushing-test speci- mens of brittle materials have had a cubical form. So long as the theoreti- cal angle of rupture was thought to be 45 this was proper; but since this theoretical angle approaches 60, it is evident that the height of the speci- men should be at least one and one half times the least lateral dimension, in order to allow of failure on a normal angle. Prof. Bauschinger has studied this question very exhaustively, and the following conclusions are drawn from studies of his results of tests on a very uniform quality of fine Swiss sandstone, all possible refinements as to appliances having been introduced : * He recommends the formula for all shapes of cross-section and for all relative heights, where p = crushing strength per unit of area; A = area of cross-section ; u = perimeter of cross-section; h = height of specimen; a and & = constants. For rectangular cross-sections the following formula serves very well : 4/~j p =*+**, . ( 8 ) where k and k' are constants. The application of this formula is shown in Fig. 15, in which the tests were on three sets of sandstone prisms of the dimensions 2-j- in. by 5 in., 3f in. by 5 in., and 5 in. by 5 in. in cross-section, respectively, the heights of each set varying from one-half to five times the least lateral dimension. It is * Mittheilungen aw dem Mechanisch TechniscJien Laboratorium der K. TecJinischen Hoclischule in MuncJien, von J. Bauschinger, vol. vi, 1876. 30 THE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. V X 4000 1 1 wr and =-, and the curve as shown i Fig. 17 is the result.* Thus, from this mean curve, we have the equation strength of prism Q strength of cube h ' r here b l = least lateral dimension, and li = height of prism. This equation shows that the strength of a stone prism whose height is * This law holds between the limits h = 0.4& and h = 56, these being the limits of ie observations. 32 THE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. one and one half times its least lateral dimension has a strength equal 92$ of the strength of a cube of the same material. This height of =- = - was found to be necessary to allow the materi i to shear on the theoretical angle of 45 -j- ~. Hence when the cubic form is used for test specimens in crushing, the results are if the proper height of specimen had been chosen. greater th; ay 0.4 d<3 /.2 {6 2.4 2.8 3.2 d 40 44 48 S.2 FIG. 17. Relation between the Crushing Strength of Prisms and Cubes. Also, if a brick, for instance, be tested flatwise, in which positi - 1 = 2, we find from this curve it will give a result 22$ greater than tl for a cube, and 33$ greater than that for a specimen in which r ' = - ft O other words, the results from tests on cubes are 9$ too large, and on brie flatwise they are 33$ too large. It will also be noted that, so far as these tests go, the unit strength the material is no function of the size of the specimen, but only afunch of its form. 23. Effects of Loading a Portion of the Cross-section.* (a) Chamfei Edges. If the edges of a cube or prism be chamfered off as shown Fig. 18, and the load applied uniformly over the reduced area, the law * All the tests discussed in this article are taken from Prof. Bauschmger's publisl reports, but the'author of this work has discussed them witn the results as given. MATERIALS UNDER COMPRESSIVE STRESS. the variation of strength with varying areas of compressed surface is shown by the curves on this figure. Thus, as the area of pressed surface approaches that of the full cross- section, the load carried per unit of pressed surface decreases, as shown by the curved locus at the top, while the average load on the full cross-section ^000 /q000 n 000 0000 J000 2000 FIG. 18. Crushing Streugth of Cubes with Chamfered Edges. (Bausclringer.) increases uniformly, as shown by the straight locus of Fig. 18, the two loci meeting at 9500 pounds, the strength per square inch of a full cube. These results show clearly that the bearing surface should be that of the full cross-section of the specimen if normal results are to be obtained. The contrary has sometimes been asserted that the strength of the specimen was not increased appreciably by the material outside the bearing surface. In other words, crushing -test specimens should be true prisms in form, without chamfered edges or rounded corners. Since the locus of unit strength for bearing surface, Fig. 18, comes nearly into a horizontal direction as the pressed surface approaches the full area of cross-section, it follows that when the pressed surface is nearly equal to that of the full cross-section of the specimen the error introduced 34 THE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. by considering only the pressed surface is very small. For instance, if the area of the compressed surface is 0.8 that of the full cross-section (dimen- sions of cross-section 0.9 those of the full section), the error introduced by considering the pressed surface only would be by this curve -^VW 3.2^. (b) Square Bearing, Symmetrically Placed. AVhen the pressed surface is square and placed symmetrically on a larger cube, the relation of the resistance per unit of pressed surface to the strength of the cube is shown on Fig. 19. Here the curves are given for the small bearing on one side I, w $ < S000 6000 S000 #000 FIG. 19. Effect of Loading a Portion only of the Surface of a Cube. (Bauscliinger.) and also on opposite sides, and the crushing resistance computed and plotted per unit of bearing surface and also per unit of cross-section of the cube. Evidently the loci must all meet at a point where the bearing area equals the total area on each side, and this point will be the strength of a cube of this material, which was 9500 pounds per square inch, the same as shown in Fig. 18, the material being the same. MATERIALS UNDER COMPRESSIVE STRESS. 35 (c) Bearing Surface Rectangular and Extending Entirely Across the Cube. In this case the resistance per square inch is a function of the dis- tance of the pressed surface from the edge of the cube. This law is shown in Fig. 20. The material being the same as before, the strength of a cube 26000 22000 /sooo /OOOO &OOO 2000 s Iff LL'L/l- //zz /0 20 30 40 JO ffl 7O 00 W FIG. 20. Effect of Loading a Zone on the Surface of a Cube. (Bauschinger.) would be 9500 pounds per square inch. This corresponds to a distance from the edge of the cube equal to 8$ of the half-width. As the bearing- surface had a width equal to 10$ of the half-width of the specimen, it fol- lows that the outer line of the pressed surface came within 3$ of the half- width, or \\% of the total width from the edge of the specimen when the normal strength of the material was developed.* 24. General Laws of Crushing Strength. The laws of crushing strength shown in Figs. 15 to 20 apply specifically to a particular quality of sand- stone. In Fig. 16 it is shown that cast iron follows a different law. In all probability each kind of material, or at least materials which have different angles of rupture (that is to say, different coefficients of friction), will show different curves for the several relations indicated in these plates. In the absence of any more definite information, however, on this subject, it is thought the curves shown upon these plates will serve to indicate in a general way the laws of the variation of crushing strength with the varying conditions here indicated. * See figures 12 and 13 for methods of failure for cases (a), (5), and (c). 36 THE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. By referring to Fig. 14 [it will be observed that the cylinders all swelled more or less in the middle before rupture occurred. This is doubt- less due to the restraining action of the friction against lateral motion on the end bearing surfaces. It is difficult to take this source of strength fully into account in a theoretical analysis of resistance to crushing. 25. Strength of Columns. When a compression member is so long as to fail in compression by lateral deflection, its failure is a function of the elastic-limit strength and of the stiffness (modulus of elasticity) of the material, rather than of the ultimate strength of the material in compres- sion. The discussion of this case properly comes in works on mechanics and on framed structures. The author has fully expressed his views on this question in his work on Modern Framed Structures, and to some extent in Chapter XVI of this work, and hence he will not occupy space with it here. 26. Weakening Effects of Eccentric Loading. Few persons are aware of the great increase of stress on the near side of a member subjected to a n n n ~~~ direct stress (either tension or compres- sion) caused by an eccentricity of the load-line with reference to the gravity- axis of the member. This eccentricity may result from an eccentric imposi- tion of the load itself; or from the member being bent; or from the ad- dition of material on one side of the member, such addition usually prov- ing a source of weakness instead of strength. These three cases are shown in Fig. 21. In each case we have Total load = P; " area = A ; Eccentricity = a\ Width =h; Moment of inertia of section = /; Radius of gyration of section = r; Distance of extreme fibre from the gravity-axis = y l = with symmetrical A T a FIG. 21. sections; Total stress on nearest outer fibre =/. h Hence we have for symmetrical cross-sections, where y, = , A * The stress due to the bending moment Pa is found from the equation m = or #i /= , where m = Pa, and / = Ar*. MATERIALS UNDER COMPRESSIVE STRESS. 37 For solid rectangular cross-sections we have r 2 = = ; hence for A. LA such sections The proportionate increase in the stress, therefore, over that which would obtain for a concentric load is given by the fraction y . In other words, when a = ^h the stress on the outer fibre on the near side is doubled, compared with that for a central loading. To discover the weakening effect of additional material added to one side of a member, assume a central loading on a straight symmetrical member having an initial width = h, (a = o). If additional material, to a thickness of x, be now added on one side of this member, the new total width x becomes h -\- x, and the eccentricity is a = . Assuming the member to be solid rectangular in cross-section, with original dimensions of b and h, the new dimensions of section are b and h-\-x; the former area was A = bh, and P P the latter A' = b(h -{- x). Before the addition we should have/= = . A Oil After the addition we should have, from (14), for the stress on the near side, 0.) Hence the increase of the stress due to an unsymmetrical addition of material is (16) This is zero for x = and for x = 2h, and it is a maximum for x = -, when it becomes Hence we may say that the addition of material on one side of a mem- ber subjected to a direct stress symmetrically placed weakens it until the added material has exceeded twice the original thickness of the member, the maximum weakening occurring when the added material is one half the original thickness, when the enlarged member is only three fourths as strong as the original member.* * Attention was called to this fact by Mr. Carl G. Earth in Trans. Engrs. Club of Phila., Oct. 1891, p. 307. CHAPTER IV. MATERIALS UNDER SHEARING STRESS. 27. Two Manifestations of Shearing Stress. When all the opposing external forces which act on a body lie in one plane,* but not in one and the 'same line, the resisting stresses are those of simple shear and cross- bending, without torsional stress. When the opposing external forces do not lie in one plane the resisting stresses are those of torsional shear, with or without cross-bending and simple shear. In any case these three kinds of stress are determined separately, as follows : (a) For Parallel External Forces in One Plane. The moment oi resistance of the bending (direct) stresses at any transverse section is equal to the algebraic sum of the moments of tho external forces on either side oi that section taken about the neutral axis in that section. The simple shearing stress on any section is equal to the algebraic sum of the transverse components of the external forces on either side of that section. (b) For Parallel External Forces Not in One Plane. First replace all the forces by equal parallel forces acting in the plane of the axis of the body; and by couples equal in value in each case to the force multiplied by its displacement. Then the moments of resistance and the simple shearing stresses will be the same as in the last case, and in addition there will be* the moment of torsion. The torsional moment at any transverse section is equal to the algebraic sum of the moments of the couples of the displaced forces, acting on either side of the transverse section in question, (c) For Non-parallel Forces Acting in Any Manner. Resolve all forces into horizontal and vertical components at their points of application, and then solve for bending moments, shears, and torsions at any section in these two planes. ;' The bending moment at this section will then be the square root of the sum of the squares of the bending moments at right angles to each other. * When a force is distributed over an area it is here supposed to act at the centre- of gravity of these force-elements. MATERIALS UNDER SHEARING STRESS. 39 The total shear will also be the square root of the sum of the squares of the primary shears at right angles to each other. The total moment of torsion will be the algebraic sum of the two moments of torsion found from the two sets of forces. 28. The Moment of Torsion gives rise to a shearing stress over the entire cross-section, which is zero at the centre of gravity of the section, and which increases in intensity directly as the radial distance from the gravity axis. For various forms of sections, the following intensities of shearing stress are found, by the principles of mechanics, for the corresponding forms of cross-section. The general equation for resistance to torsion is .a) Figure. Dimensions. i Radius = r. Outer radius = r (. Inner " = t\ ( Side = b. 3uter dimension = b [uner " = b 1 Side = a. Radius of circumscribed circle = r Longer axis = 2a I Shorter axis = 26 ) longer semi-axes=a&ct 1 Shorter " " =6&6 X ) Area. &a 6 2 - 6^ 3a 2 _ 2,-a |/2 irab rr(ab a 1 6 1 ) J* nr*_ ~2~ + 2^2) 4 - 2r 31/2 3 1/2 1.083o 1.876r ~(os + & a ) 40 THE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. where M total torsional moment; s = shearing stress on extreme fibre; J* = polar moment of inertia of cross-section about the gravity axis r distance from neutral axis to the extreme fibre having th shearing stress s. Whence we have, for the forms figured, the relations given in th table. 29. Shearing Deformations. As shown in Arts. (7) and (8), a shearin action of external forces results in angular deformation of the body. L the case of simple shear, or where the forces lie in one plane, the angula deformation from shear is very small, the bending being mostly due to th longitudinal deformations resulting in the direct tensile and compressiv resisting stresses on the two sides of th neutral plane respectively. When th forces do not lie in one plane, or wher there is a moment of torsion, the angula deformation gives rise to a twist of th body about the neutral longitudinal axis Thus in Fig. 23 assume the solid cylindei anchored at o, to have a length / and radius r. Let the torsional moment be Pa = M t . Then the shearin. stress on the extreme fibre is, by equation (1), _ M t r _ 2Pa where J"is the polar moment of inertia = twice the rectangular moment o inertia in this case. In Art. 9 the shearing modulus of elasticity was defined as __ shearing stress per sq. in. angular deformation If we take the stress and angular deformation of the outer fibre i Fig. 23, we have : 2 Pa Shearing stress per sq. in. = s - r . Tangent of the deformation angle -= = deformation angle, since this angle is small. Hence we have _ _ si 8 ~ ~ * The student's attention is called to the fact that the polar moment of inertia equal to the sum of the true rectangular moments of inertia about the principal ax through the centre of gravity of the section. MATERIALS UNDER SHEARING STRESS. 41 or In general, for any cross-section we have M t l si M t l si s = ~ = = where y^ distance from the neutral axis to the extreme fibre in which the stress is s. In Art. 9 it was shown that the shearing modulus of elasticity f of Young's modulus, or E s = \E. Hence in terms of Young's modulus of elasticity, which is that ordinarily given, we have 5 MJ,^5sl_ 2 ' EJ ZEyS where 6 = angular movement in terms of the radius; M t = torsional moment on the bar; I length of bar between sections representing a relative angular movement of 0; s = shearing stress on outer fibre; E s shearing modulus of elasticity of the material; E = the ordinary modulus of elasticity; J = polar moment of inertia = I x -\- I y , where these are the rectan- gular moments of inertia about the principal axis through the centre of gravity of the section ; y^ = distance from neutral axis of outer fibre in which the shearing stress is s. CHAPTER V. MATERIALS UNDER CROSS-BENDING STRESS. 30. Historical Sketch.* For two hundred and fifty years the true theory of the strength of a beam has been a much-mooted question amongst physicists, engineers, and mathematicians. Galileo was the first of whom we have any record who undertook to discuss the problem. In his famous Dialogues (Leiden, 1638, from which Fig. 24 is taken) he FIG. 24. propounds a theory based on an assumed absolute rigidity of the material, and con- cluded that the fibres of the beam were subjected to a uniform tension which acted I about the base of the beam as a fulcrum. On this theory the moment of resistance * This historical review of the development of the true theory of the beam is derived! mostly from Saint-Venant's Historique Abrege des Recherches sur la Resistance et sur- I ' Elasticite des Corps Bolides, prefixed to his Navier's "Lecons," Third Edition, Paris,, 1864, and from Totlhunter's History of the Theory of Elasticity, Cambridge, Eng., 1886. It is here reprinted from the author's joint work on Modern Framed Structures. 42 MATERIALS UNDER CROSS-BENDING STRESS. 43 of a solid rectangular beam would be , where / is the ultimate strength of the material in tension. Robert Hooke first published his famous law of the relation between deformation and stress in 1678, discovered by him he says 18 years previously, and kept secret for the purpose of procuring patents on some applications of the principle to springs' for watches, clocks, etc. Two years previously he had ventured to publish the law in an anagram at the end of another book, in this form, " ciiiinosssttuv" which being interpreted reads, "Ut tensio sic vis," or, ' 4 as the extension so is the resist- ance." Hooke makes this law apply to all "springy" bodies, amongst which he names nearly all ordinary solids. This is still known as Hooke s Law. Mariotte showed by experiment in 1680 that the fibres on one side of the beam were extended and on the other side compressed, and assumed that the neutral surface passes through the centre of gravity of the section. Varignon, in 1702, undertakes to harmonize the theories of Galileo and Mari- otte, by admitting the extension of the fibres, but puts the neutral plane at the bot- tom, as Galileo did, and assumes the tensile stress as uniformly varying from there to the other side. This would make the strength of a solid rectangular beam - -, 3 which agrees almost exactly w r ith the facts for cast iron at rupture when f is the tensile strength. James Bernouilli made an important advance by applying Mariotte's law to obtain deflections of beams (1694 and 1705), and argued that the position of the neutral axis is a matter of indifference, which was a great error. He denied the truth of Hooke's law, which we know is not applicable to all substances, nor to the point of rupture with any substance. He first constructed stress diagrams, but his work in the field of hydraulics was of even greater importance than in the study of solids. A. Parent, a French academician, seems to have been the first to perceive (1713) the mechanical necessity of equilibrium between the tensile and compressive stresses, which condition, together with that of a uniform variation of stress, fixes the posi- tion of the neutral axis at the centre of gravity of the section. This important dis- covery seems, however, to have passed unnoticed. Coulomb reannounced this relation in a memoir to the French Academy in 1773, or sixty years after its first publication by Parent. Saint- Venant credits Coulomb with never having seen Parent's work, as no writer of that century, has mentioned it. But even after this second publication of so important a necessary truth, such workers as Girard, Barlow, and Tredgold all misconceived the mathematical necessi- ties in the problem, and resorted to various makeshifts to explain the strength of beams. - Navier finally, in 1824, put the matter on a solid mathematical basis, although he also at first went entirely astray. He stated in his first edition that the moment of resistance varied as the cube of the depth of the beam, and in his second edition this error was corrected, but the moment of the stresses on one side of the neutral axis was said to be equal to the moment of the stresses on the other side, about that axis, an equality which does not exist except on symmetrical sections. Navier also fully developed the theory of the deflection of beams as we now use it. Saint-Venant, a student of Navier's, has finally (1857) in his notes on Navier's Lemons given a complete analysis of both the elastic and the ultimate strength of a beam, with suitable equations which will give theoretical results agreeing with the actual tests, when the empirical constants are properly evaluated. This great engi- neer, physicist, and teacher has done more than any other one to bring theory and practice into harmony and to put both on a thoroughly scientific basis, so far as the strength and elasticity of engineering materials is concerned.* In spite of these various true expositions of this subject the source of strength in a beam continues still to be very imperfectly understood by * He died January 6, 1886. THE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. many engineers, and even by current writers on applied mechanics, and gross errors in this direction are still common. It is in consideration of this state of the science that the problem is treated so fully here. 31. Fundamental Equations of Equilibrium. When a solid body is in equilibrium under the action of non-concurrent external forces, the follow- ing propositions hold true for the body as a whole: I. The sum of the vertical components of /he external forces is equal to zero. II. The sum of the horizontal components of the external forces taken in any plane is equal to zero. III. The sum of the moments of the external forces taken about any point is equal to zero. When a solid body is subjected to the action of non-concurrent forces acting in one plane the body may be regarded as a beam, since the effect of the external forces is to bend the body and develop in it what are commonly called cross-bending stresses. If a section be passed through the body perpendicular to the plane of the forces, and the portion of the body on one side of this section be removed, the other portion may beheld in equilibrium with the external forces act- ing upon it, by means of the stresses exist- ing in the body on this cross-section, these stresses now being regarded as external forces, as indicated in Fig. 25. Since the remaining portion of the body now under consideration is in equilibrium under the action of external forces and of internal stresses, which for the time may be re- garded as external forces, the three propositions given above will apply. Or, stating these propositions now so as to equate the real external forces with the internal stresses developed at the section, they would read as follows : If a transverse section be passed through a beam I. The sum of the vertical components of the stresses acting at the sec- tion is equal to the sum of the vertical components of the external forces acting upon the body on either side of that section. II. The sum of the horizontal components of the stresses acting on the section is equal to the sum of the horizontal components of the external forces acting upon the body on either side of that section. III. The sum of the moments of the stresses acting on that section i? equal to the sum of the moments of the external forces acting on the body on either side of that section. It follows from the above that if all the external forces acting upon FIG. 25. MATERIALS UNDER CROSS- B ENDING STRESS. 45 a beam are parallel vertical forces, the end reactions or supports being regarded as external forces the same as any primary weights or loads, and if no horizontal forces act upon the beam, then we should have for any ver- tical section I. The shearing stress is equal to the algebraic sum of the external forces acting on either side of the section. II. The algebraic sum of the horizontal stresses acting on the section is equal to zero. III. The algebraic sum of the moments of the stresses acting on that section, which is commonly Called the moment of resistance, is equal to the sum of the moments of the external forces about any point in that section. The effect of the action of cross-bending forces upon a beam is to bend or deflect it, thus shortening the lengths of the fibres or elements on the concave side of the beam, and lengthening them on the convex side. So long as this action does not exceed the elastic limits of the material, the re- sisting stresses are directly proportional to the deformations. Hence there is always found a compress! ve stress on the concave side and a tensile stress on the convex side of a beam, and therefore there will be a plane near the centre of the beam the elements of which are neither lengthened nor shortened, and on which there will be no longitudinal stress. This is called the neutral plane or " neutral axis" of the beam. Furthermore, a geometrical effect of the bending of a beam is to pro- dace deformations which are zero at the neutral plane and which increase uniformly outward to the extreme convex and concave sides, and hence the longitudinal resisting stresses developed by these deformations also increase uniformly outward. AVithin the elastic limits, therefore, the direct stresses increase uniformly from the neutral plane to the extreme fibre*. Since from Proposition II, as stated above, the summation of the hori- zontal stresses on the cross-section is zero, in simple cross-bending, where the external forces have no horizontal components, it follows that the total summation of the tensile stresses on the convex side of the neutral plane must always exactly equal the total summation of the compressive stresses on the concave side. Also by Proposition III the sum of the moments of all these stresses taken about any point in this plane must equal the sum of the moments of the external forces acting on either side of the section taken about the same point. If this centre of moments be taken in the neutral plane itself it will at once be evident that the moment of the tensile forces on one side has the same sign as the moment of the compressive forces on the other side, and that they are, therefore, to be added together numer- ically in order to equal the algebraic sum of the moments of the external forces acting on either side of the section. While, therefore, the sum of the moments of the tensile stresses may be numerically equal to the sum of the moments of the compressive stresses (which is the case for symmetrical cross-sections), yet since they are to be added together numerically, in order 46 THE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. to equal or hold in equilibrium the moments of the external forces on one side of the section, there is evidently no mathematical necessity why the moments of the compressive stresses should equal the moments of the tensile stresses; and in unsymmetrical sections, and even in symmetrical sections beyond the elastic limit, these moments are not equal to each other. Since the stresses on any cross-section of a beam subjected to the action of bending forces increase uniformly from the neutral plane to the extreme sides, it is evident that it is only the stress found to exist in the extreme fibres or elements of the beam, which needs to be determined. That is to say, if the maximum stresses are kept within the working limits, it is imma- terial what the particular stresses are on other portions of the cross-section. It is common, therefore, to find the relation between the total moment of resistance of a beam (which of necessity is always numerically equal to the bending moment of the external forces), and the stresses on the extreme fibres or elements of the cross-section of the beam. This general relation between the bending moment and the stresses on the extreme fibres is made the subject of the following article. 32. Relation between the Moment of Resistance and the Stress on the Extreme Fibre. In Fig. 26 let the load P be applied at (7, and this will ! LH , (S) \y c /K i - j k ; \ p FIG. 26. produce a bending moment on AB of Pd. On this plane the moment of the longitudinal stresses makes up the moment of resistance which holds in equilibrium (and hence is always numerically equal to) the bending moment of the external forces. That is to say, M= Pd = M , the moment of resist- ance. We shall here assume the cross-section to be irregular and unsym- metrical, as shown in the figure. The direct stress varies uniformly across the section in all cases. The following notation will be used : M = bending moment of the external forces. M = moment of resistance of the direct stresses = M. p = intensity of the direct stress at the distance ?/ from the neutral plane ay, where a = intensity of direct stress at a unit's distance. f = intensity of the direct stress at the extreme side of the beam. y 1 = distance of extreme fibre on one side from the neutral axis. v ' = " " " " " the other side from the neutral axis. MATERIALS UNDER CROSS-BENDING STRESS. 47 / = y*dxdy moment of inertia of the cross-section about the centre of gravity axis, y = distance from axis of reference to the centre of gravity of the cross-section. Intensity of stress on any fibre = p = ay\ (1) Total stress on fibre having an area of dxdy = pdxdy = ay dxdy ', . . (2) Moment of stress on fibre dxdy = pydxdy = ay* dxdy; (3) /+! y*dxdy al. . (4) 2/1' But SLS p = ay, so/= ay t and/' = ayf\ or Therfeore fl* f'l M - M n = al = - - = J r (5) I y* y' This is the general equation between the moment of resistance and the stress on either extreme fibre. When the section is symmetrical, y ^ = yf\ hence f = f' 9 and only one side need be considered. When the cross-section is solid and rectangular, equation (5) becomes (6) The above demonstration assumed that the neutral axis or plane of the beam passed through the centre of gravity of the cross-section, since /was referred to this gravity axis. This remains to be proved. From equation (2) we have, the stress on any element is ay dxdy, where y is measured from the neutral axis. But for simple cross-bending the algebraic sum of these direct stresses over the whole section is zero; hence we have But /+Vl /+! /+01 aydxdy a I ydxdy a I ydA = ..... (?) -VT! "-Hi! * / -Vi' fydA=yA,\ ............. (8) *Both equation (5), M = , for any section, and equation (6), M Q \fbli* t for solid y\ rectangular section, should be thoroughly memorized by the student, as they are of con- stant application. f The symbol y denotes the distance from the axis of y to the centre of gravity of the f ydxdy f ydxdy cross-section, and it equals . Jdxdy A 48 THE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. since the sum of the statical moments of the elementary areas about any axis is equal to the moment of the total area into the distance to its centre of gravity. Therefore we have, for reference to the neutral axis, /H-2/1 i I yd A = 0, *'.' or yA 0. (9) But yA can only equal zero when reference is made to the gravity axis- Therefore these two axes must coincide. In other words, the neutral plane always traverses the centre of gravity axis of the beam, so long as the stresses remain inside the elastic Hunts of the material in both tension and compression, and also provided the modulus of elasticity is the same for both kinds of stress. 33. Moments of Resistance (Strength) of Beams of Various Forms of Cross-section. The moment of resistance of a beam of any form of cross- Form of Cross- section. Distance of Centre of Gravity, or Neutral Axis, from the Most Distant Fibre. Moment of Inertia about the Centre of Gravity of the Section. = 7 Moment of Resistance in Terms of the Stress in the Most Distant Fibre. -- *6 > h If 6/1,3 12 > O: d ~2 vd* 64 / d> le" 1 24^ ; ' i* " o "* T7V h 12 7 V> 6 ^ //IJ ">'^?T" 1 bh* - (b - t'yh - 2f)3 57^3 _ ^ - t'yh - 2t) 3 f '"2Ei. 12 6/1 /IE lt'h* + t(b -t')(h- JO b/j,3 _ (b - t'yh - t) 3 fl t'h + <(6 - V) 3 Vi ^* . 6 + 26' fc ^rBft-f*' (6+26')^ //^r3(36 + 6')(6 + 60 /^ \ * 6 + 6' * 3 k L 12 18(6 + 6') J eL 2(6 + 26') ( 6 + 26 U $' MATERIALS UNDER CROSS-BENDING STRESS. 49 section was found to be, by equation (5), M a = , where /= intensity of stress on the extreme fibre which lies at a distance from the neutral plane equal to y lt and /is the rectangular moment of inertia of the cross-section about the neutral or gravity axis. In the table on p. 48 are given the values of ?/,, /, and M for various forms of sections which are commonly used as beams. For tabular and graphical methods of finding the moments of inertia of irregular forms, see Modern Framed Structures, pages 127-130. The values given in the above table are true for all values of /inside the elastic limit. When this limit is exceeded the stress no longer varies uni- formly across the section, but the stresses near the neutral axis are larger than the above theory allows, and hence, for a given actual stress on the extreme fibres beyond the elastic limit (as the breaking-stress, for instance), the moment of resistance is much more than would-be obtained by using the breaking value of /(in tension Of compression) and substituting this in the above formulae. It must be understood, therefore, that in no case are these formulae, true at rupture, but only inside the elastic limits of the ma-. terial. It is for this reason that the values of /as found from cross-bending tests carried to failure, and as computed from the above formula?, differ so largely from the breaking values of the material in direct tension or com- pression.* Thus, cast iron, which has a tensile strength of 20,000 pounds per square inch and which breaks on the tension side in cross-breaking, has a value of/, when computed by the above formulae from a breaking-load, of from 30,000 to 40,000 pounds per square inch, depending somewhat on the shape of the cross-section of the specimen. The more the material is con- centrated near the neutral plane the more the value of /differs from the tensile strength. This value of/ computed from the breaking moment, is called the modulus of rupture in cross-breaking. It is from 1.5 to 2 times the tensile strength of the metal. In timber beams the reverse is the case; that is to say, the crushing resistance being less than the tensile resistance, the modulus of rupture in cross-breaking is greater than the former and less than the latter, and it is in fact nearly a mean of the two. 34. Strength (Moment of Resistance) of Beams beyond their Elastic Limits. After the stress on the extreme fibres on one or both sides of the beam has passed the elastic limit, the distribution of stress over the section is no longer uniformly varying as was assumed in deriving the formulae of the last article, and the law of this variation will now be examined. In all cases the variation of stress across the transverse section of a, beam subjected to simple cross-bending, with or without shearing stress, folloivs the law of the variation of the stress ordinates to a stress-diagram * See a full discussion of this subject iii the author's work on Modern Framed Structures, Chapter VIII. 50 THE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. in which the extreme ordinate represents the stress on the extreme fibre of the beam. Thus in Fig. 28, suppose the beam to be cast iron, and to be bent until the stress on the extreme fibre on the tension side has become f t . Passing FIG. 28. now to the tension portion of the stress-diagram for this material,* we see- that this stress,/,, is found far beyond the elastic limit of the metal in ten- sion. Let us now recur to the fact that the deformation of the longitudinal fibres of the beam increases uniformly outward from the neutral axis, even beyond the elastic limit, since the section remains sensibly plane, and hence the uniform increase of the deformation is a geometrical necessity. In view of this fact it becomes evident that the law of increase of stress from the neutral axis outwards, or the law of the increments of stress correspond- ing to equal increments of deformation, is exactly that represented by the stress-diagram, since here we have the increments of stress shown for equal increments of deformation. Hence it follows that if f t is the stress on the extreme fibre of the bent beam on the tension side the stresses on all other fibres on the tension side are truly indicated by the lengths of the- corresponding ordinates on that side of the neutral axis, when the position of the stress ordinate/ in the stress-diagram is taken as the position of the extreme tension side of the beam, and the origin in that diagram is taken as lying on the neutral axis of the beam. Evidently the same argument would apply to the compression side. 35. Distribution of Stress and Position of the Neutral Axis at Ruptuie. In a brittle material like stone or cast iron, failure occurs on the tension side; while in the case of wood, failure usually occurs first on the compres- sion side of the beam. The diagrams shown in Fig. 28 may fairly be taken as representing the facts in the case of cast iron, and those in Fig. 29 in the case of timber. Since timber is much stronger in tension than in compres- sion, it fails first on the compression side. Furthermore, after the fibres have buckled, or broken down, in compression, they are able to support only about three fourths as much of a load as before, so that the compression stress-diagram has the peculiar form shown in the accompanying figure. At failure, therefore, the tensile and compressive stresses are distributed over the section in a manner entirely different from that which obtains * See Chap. XXIII for complete stress-dingrams for cast iron of various qualities. MATERIALS UNDER CROSS-BENDING STRESS. 51 within the elastic limit. The statement made in Art. 25, however, regard- ing the equality between the sums of the tensile and compressive stresses must still hold, as this is a mathematical or mechanical necessity; and as this total stress is graphically represented by the area of the stress-diagram FIG. 29. shown on the sections of the beams in Figs. 28 and 29, it follows that these stress areas on the two sides of the neutral axis must be equal. Thus in the case of timber, for instance, the neutral plane at first lies in the centre of gravity of the cross-section, but after the material has begun to crush on the compression side, the neutral plane rapidly moves towards the tension side of the beam and often, at final rupture, it lies very near this side, the tension stress area being a triangle of very long base (stress on extreme fibre) and very short altitude (distance to neutral plane). It is evident that, although the beam has long since failed in compression, if it be con- tinuously deflected, failure must ultimately occur also in tension. When the material is weaker in tension than in compression such double failure cannot occur, since the tension failure parts the body, and the rupture is complete. Evidently no general law can be given for distribution of the stress across the section after the elastic limit has been passed, other than to say it is that of the corresponding stress-diagrams of that material in direct tension and compression respectively. 36. Moduli of Rupture in Cross-breaking. Prom the facts related in the preceding article it is evident that the formulae of Articles 32 and 33 cannot apply at rupture, and that if the breaking-load be used for computing the so-called ultimate strength of the material in pounds per square inch (the "modulus of rupture in cross-breaking/ 7 and the quantity /"in those formulas when P is the breaking-load, or when M is the ultimate bending moment), the result obtained as the value of /is a purely fictitious quantity, and that it does not really represent any actual tensile or compressive stress on the extreme fibres at all. It may, however, be called the " modulus of rupture in cross-breaking" in pounds per square inch, and used to indicate the strength of the material when loaded as a beam ; but it must- not be con- fused with, or assumed to have any fixed relation to, either the tensile or the compressive strength of the material. As a matter of fact it always lies somewhere between these two latter values, but it does not have any uni- THE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. versal relation to them. It is always dependent largely on the form of the cross-section of the beam, as to the concentration of material near the neu- tral axis or near the extreme sides. Thus the elastic-limit strength of a rolled I beam can be very closely approximated by using for /in equation (5) the tensile or compressive elastic-limit strength of the material in either tension or compression, while the elastic-limit strength of a solid round bar could not be determined very closely by so doing. Also the ultimate strength of a cast-iron beam of an I-shaped cross-section could be deter- mined approximately by using the tensile strength of the material for the value of / on the tension side of the beam in eq, (5), but the ultimate strength of a round or square cast-iron bar would be nearly twice as much as would be shown by the use of eq. (5) if the tensile modulus of rupture were taken. 37. The Distribution of Shearing Stress in a Beam. (a) The Relation between Shear and Bending Moment at any Section. In Fig. 30 assume any two adjacent sections dx apart. Let the total shearing force acting here be S. Call the bending moment at the first section M, and that at the other M'. Assume the beam to be cut at the section where the moment is M 9 and the left portion re- moved and replaced by the direct tensile and com- pression stresses, and also by the total shear, S. Then it is evident the moment at the adjacent section is .... (10) M M M M But FIG. M' -M= dM, hence we have M'-M=dM=Sdx, or o dM dx' (11) That is to say, the total shear on any transverse section of a beam is equal to the first differential coefficient of the bending moment. It follows from this that (1) Where the bending moment is constant the shear is zero. (2) Where the shear is zero the bending moment is at a maximum or a minimum. (b) The Distribution of the Shearing Stress across any Transverse Sec- tion. In Fig. 31 take two transverse sections, dx apart, as before, on which the moments are M and M' respectively. By eq. (5), Art. 26, we have for the stresses on the outer fibres at these two sections and MATERIALS UNDER CROSS-BENDING STRESS. 53 Also for any horizontal section, as cc 1 ', the fibre stresses will be P =f?L=%> and ,' = * The breadth of the beam must be regarded as variable to obtain a gen- eral solution, and it will be denoted by b, a variable quantity. Now the total shearing stress on the section cc' , whose area is b'dx,i& the difference between the total direct stress on a'c' and on ac. But the stress- on ac is A/17 ir ^ X//i / bMyd pbdy / ' T Jy> 1 Similarly, the total direct stress on a'c' is The difference is f'b(M'- M)ydy _ C^ldMydy. Jy I "Jt 7 v' But dM '= Sdx by the previous article, hence we have at last C yi bSdxydy total stress on plane cc' I ~~f~~ .... t/ y* But the area of this section on cc' is bdx. Hence the intensity of the stress on this plane is / c/ y* I Vl bSdxydy b'ldx" Now S, I, and b' are constant for any given beam, transverse section, and : plane of shear cc' '; hence these quantities can be removed from under the integral sign, and we have Intensity of shearing stress at any point in a beam, distant y from tlie neutral axis, is /*/! Now / bydy is the statical moment of that portion of the cross-section of the beam outside the line cc' on which the shearing stress is obtained, taken about the neutral axis; hence we may say: The intensity of the shearing stress at any point in the cross-section of a beam is equal to the total shearing stress on that cross-section, multiplied by the statical moment of the area of that portion of the cross-section out- side the longitudinal plane of shear in question, about its axis in the neu- 54 THE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. tral plane, divided by the product of the moment of inertia of the entire cross-section into the breadth of the section at that point. This applies to solid sections of beams of all possible shapes. For a solid rectangular section b is constant and / bydy = ~(y* y z ). Jy Hence for this case, where h = 2y lt and b b' (a constant), we have =[(!)' -/]- 1 Hence the shear at the extreme sides, where y -, is zero, and at the fy neutral axis That is to say, the maximum intensity of the shearing stress on a solid rectangular section is f of the mean intensity. It is evident, also, that eq. (14) is the equation of a parabola with it vertex on the neutral axis, whic Beam uniformly loaded . , , -, . ,, A , is also the axis of the curve. 'eutral any particular longitudinal plane also, the shearing intensity varie from end to end of the beam, a the total shearing stresses on th cross-sections vary, as shown i Fig. 32. By applying equation (14) to various forms of cross-section it ca be shown that 1. The maximum shearing intensity in a beam of a solid rectangula section = |- the mean shear. 2. For a solid circular section it is f the mean shear. 3. For I beams and plate girders it is practically equal to the total shea divided by the area of the web portion alone.* 38. To Dimension the Cross-section of a Beam. (a) For Direct Stress O't the Outer Fibre. If the beam be of a solid rectangular form of cross-section use eq. (G). If of any other form, use eq. (5) and evaluate by the accom J \ panying table, if the form be one there given. If not, it will be necessar to compute the moment of inertia. If the form be irregular or unsym metrical, it may be best to obtain the moment of inertia graphically.! Ii the case of unsymrnetrical sections the neutral axis lies at different distance from the outer fibres on the tension and compression sides, and it may b< necessary to compute both of them. Since f\ = jr- 1 , it is evident thes-- * See Modern Framed Structures, Art. 130. \ Ibid., Art. 127. MATERIALS UNDER CROSS BENDING STRESS. 55 stresses per square inch are to each other directly as the distances of their fibres from the neutral axis. Thus in the case of a cast-iron beam the cross-section is made larger on the tension side, as in Fig. 33. Here the outer fibres on the compression side are much farther away from the neutral axis than the outer fibres on the tension side, and hence the maximum stress in com- pression is much greater than it is in tension, which is as it should be. For a solid rectangular section we have M=M. = -, or bk" = ...... (16) Take M maximum bending moment on the beam, in inch-pounds, and f = working value of the stress on the outer fibre. This gives the value of bit*, and 1} and h can now be chosen at pleasure, conditioned on Wf being equal to the right-hand side of the equation. (b) For Shearing Stress along the Neutral Axis. Since timber is very weak in shearing, as compared to its strength in tension and compression, timber beams and joists of ordinary lengths will usually fail by shearing, and hence they should be dimensioned to safely withstand this shearing action. Lanza shows* that the shearing strength of spruce and white- and yellow-pine beams is about -fa of the transverse modulus at rupture, but he recommends a much smaller factor of safety for shearing than for transverse rupture. If the factor of safety for shearing be two thirds that for trans- verse strength, we would have the working stress in shearing -fa that in cross-breaking. In order to show what length of wooden beams would require dimensioning for shearing, using this relation of working stresses, we have /=20 ?0 ......... (17) For a beam loaded at the centre e W , ,, Wl S = and M . ii 4 For a beam uniformly loaded W Wl S = and M = . /w O Also from (16), for cross-breaking, Wi* -- and from (15) Applied Mechanics, 4th ed., p. 696. 66 THE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. For a beam loaded at the centre For a beam uniformly loaded QM 3 Wl bh -"T ~-*T ........ (20) From (17), (18), and (19) we find, for beams loaded at the centre, they are equally strong in shearing and in cross-breaking when <> and for beams uniformly loaded they are equally strong in these two ways when 1 - f For shorter lengths wooden beams are weaker in shearing than in cross- breaking. Hence we have the following PROPOSITIONS. Wooden Beams in Shearing and Cross-breaking. I. For a centre load the beam should be dimensioned for a shearing stress wlien the ratio of length to height is less than one half the ratio of the cross-breaking to tlie shearing working stress. II. For a uniformly distributed load the beam, should be dimensioned for a shearing stress when the ratio of length to height is less than the ratio of the cross-breaking to the shearing working stress. Thus, for white- and yellow-pine and spruce beams we may take ^ = 20.* (23) Whence All pine and spruce beams should be dimensioned for shearing failure: I For concentrated centre load ivhen T ^ 10. ( 24) For uniformly distributed load 'when -^ <20. In dimensioning for cross-breaking use equations (19) and (20), and for shearing use equation (18), for both concentrated and distributed loads. The following working values of /and q may be used. * Here q is not the true shearing resistance of sound timber, but the shearing resist- ance of large beams along their neutral axis, where they are usually season -checked. MATERIALS UNDER CROSS-BENDING STRESS. 57 Species. Working Values of Cross-breaking Modulus in Pounds per Square Inch. (f) Working Values of Shearing Modulus in Pounds per Square Inch. (: 64 THE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. 03 P I CO Ir^ CO s IB Sit 8 = II ftJ ^ flfe W w ^ lo V II A 11 + " S cS cs a ^ O S "O '-CO ^ I 1 ^ V II A g I 01 S I I V II A a MATERIALS UNDER CROSS-BENDING STRESS. 65 *B II liS-* Si II II 3 ^ * !>? 0,100 I THE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. 46. Deflections from Shearing Forces. For short beams it is necessary to take into account the shearing forces also. Since the modulus of elasticity in shearing is the ratio of the shearing stress to the angular distortion (transverse distortion per unit of length, since the angle is equal to its tangent), we may say that for a distance along the beam of dx where- A'* the shearing stress per unit area is s = r -, the differential deflection from. j shear is (36) To integrate this we have to express 8 and A as functions of x. The cross-section, A, will be assumed as constant, and for a concentrated load 8 is also constant and equal to the supporting force on that side of the- load. For a uniformly distributed load 8 is equal to the algebraic sum of the forces on one side of the plane of shear, which here must be taken normal to the deflection. Thus for any section distant x from the end of p the beam we have for a concentrated load at the centre 8 = , a con- /v stant, while for a beam uniformly loaded (supported at the ends in both cases) S = ~-px=p(^-- xj. ' Using these values in eq. (36), we have for the Deflection of a learn from shear when supported at its ends and loaded at the centre, Ys = ZETA X > r at C6ntre As = 4^1 ..... < 37) Deflection of a beam from shear when supported at its ends and uniformly loaded t or y s = -J-1 \ or at centre A s = - * . . . . (38) Hence the total deflections at the centre for these two cases are A = P ( l * , M Us-Si ^ 4^^y and 5r r z 2 \ LE/+^Z> ( 40 > * Assuming also that the shearing stress is uniformly distributed over the cross- section. MATERIALS UNDER CROSS-BENDING STRESS. 67 for beams supported at the ends and loaded with a single concentrated load P at the centre, and with a uniformly distributed load of p per unit of length, respectively. For the metals take E $ = \E, while for wood take E, = \E. The fibrous character of wood may explain the apparent anomaly. For solid rectangular wooden beams, therefore, we have For load at centre, from (39), making E 8 = \E, and r-= - -, A. J. L JL and For beam uniformly loaded, from (40), These equations show that when a rectangular wooden beam loaded at the centre has a length less than seven times the height, the deflection from shear is more than ten per cent of the total deflection, while for such a beam uniformly loaded the deflection from shear exceeds ten per cent of the total when the length is less than about six times the height. 47. Determination of Young's Modulus of Elasticity from Bending- Tests. Since E enters in all the expressions for deflection of beams, it is evident that it may be found from a bending test where all the dimensions, loads, and deflections are observed. Thus for a beam of uniform, solid, rectangular cross-section, supported at the ends and loaded at the centre, we should have, from eq. (33), for a long beam where deflection from shearing forces could be neglected, Since in testing a beam the stress on the extreme fibre is also desired, the i last form of this equation may be useful in case/ is also to be computed. However, this value of/ must be inside the elastic limit in order to use it in computing E. It is best to measure a series of coincident loads and deflections, and plot them as in Pig. 49, then draw a tangent to the curve at the origin and use this in finding E. Thus the tangent line OA is used for comput- i ing E, and the coordinates of any point on this line may be taken. It is convenient to take a point representing a deflection of unity. On this curve this corresponds to a load of 6250. The dimensions of the beam were I 140 in., I = 4.02 in., h = 8,04 in., and the material was long-leaf 8 THE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. yellow pine (Pinus palustris}. Using the second form of eq. (43) we have . Q ni s = 2,070,000 pounds per square inch. The maximum load was 13,500 pounds, from which we find, by eq. (6) tlie computed maximum stress on the outer fibre to be f TT^J = p- jj-j = 10,000 pounds per square inch. 15000 10000 ' 1 I 5000 1 Deflection 2 in inches 3 FIG. 49. The elastic-limit load might be taken as 9000 pounds, whence the fibre- stress at this limit would be 3 X 9000 X 140 - 2 X 4.02 X 8.04- = 73 ^ ^ ^ are inoh ' 48. The Rational Designing of Flitched Beams.* A flitched beam is one composed of two sticks of timber enclosing between them a wrought-iror or steel plate of the full length of the sticks, these three members beinf rigidly bolted together, preferably along the neutral plane, in such a waj that they will act as one solid member when deflecting under a load. Ir order that these two materials may come to their working stresses simul taneously, the iron or steel plate should always be of less depth than thai of the timber. To find the relative depths of steel (or wrought iron) plate and tht timber sides in order that they shall come to their working stresses at th< * This problem is introduced here, not because it is very common or important ii itself, but because it is a good type of composite systems and illustrates the methoc of analyzing such systems. MATERIALS UNDER CROSS-BENDING STRESS. 69 same time, we must utilize the principle that when two or more members jointly carry a single load, they share this load in direct proportion to their relative rigidities. The rigidity of a beam is the inverse of its flexibility, and the flexibility is measured by the deflection under a given load. Hence the rigidity will be measured by the reciprocal of the deflection. The equation representing the deflection of a solid rectangular beam, in terms of the stress on the outer fibre, is, from eq. (33), since I PI M = -fbh 2 - - for a load P at the centre. o 4 pr 1 ~ But since the rigidity is measured "by the reciprocal of the deflection, we have as a measure of the rigidity of a rectangular beam, in terms of the stress on the outer fibre, 5 = rigidity = -^ = ^ (45) _/ / We may now write the proportion: Deflection of the t deflection of the t the rigidity of e the rigidity of wooden beam steel plate the plate the beam, or But Hence we have for a flitched beam, in which A w A s , A w R s E s h s f w A - A s : R -. R , or 4- = * (46> Rs A s R: W EJi s f w (47> (48) where R w = rigidity of the timber sides; R a = same for the steel plate; A w = deflection of the timber sides; A s = same of the steel plate; E w modulus of elasticity of timber = from 1,000,000 in white pine to 1,800,000 in long-leaf yellow pine; Es = modulus of elasticity of wrought iron and steel = 28,000,000; P = total load on flitched beam ; P w = load carried by the timber sides; P 8 = same for the steel plate; /, = working fibre-stress for timber = from 1000 in white pine to- 1800 in long-leaf yellow pine; / 8 = same for steel = 12,000 to 18,000 pounds per square inch; 70 THE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. li w = depth of the timbers in inches; h s = same for the steel plate; b w = total thickness of both timbers in inches; b s = same for the steel plate. From eq. (48) we may derive many important relations: (a) To find the relative depths of steel plate and wooden learns to give simultaneous working stresses in each. Eq. (48) may be written Example : Let E s = 28,000,000, E w = 1,400,000, f s = 16,000, / w = 1600; then h _ 28,000,OOOJ<_1600_ __ 9 1T S ~ 1,400,000 X 16,000 ~" ~* That is to say, the wooden sides must be twice as deep as the steel plate, regardless of their respective thicknesses, in order to give a working stress- in the \vooden sides of one tenth that in the steel plate. (b) To find the relative stresses on the outer fibres when the plate is of' the full depth of the timber sides. We now put eq. (48) in the form /KAX f s E ...... (50) Using the same values of fias above, and making h w = h s , we have .U _ E w _ 1 fs El ~ 20' Hence when the steel or iron plate has the full depth of the wooden sides, the stress in the outer fibres of the timber is only one twentieth that in the plate. This does pretty well for a white-pine and steel combination. But in the case of white pine we should not take E w higher than 1,000,000. Hence we have for white pine and steel of equal depths fw_E L _ 1,000,000 1 fa E 8 28,000,000 ~~ 28' That is, the maximum stress in the timber is only ^ that in the steel plate. For an elastic limit of steel of 40,000 pounds per square inch we may have a working fibre-stress of 20,000 pounds per square inch. This would give a fibre-stress of 700 pounds per square inch in the timber sides, which is- hardly a sufficiently high working stress for white pine. All these conclu- sions are quite independent of the relative thicknesses of plate and sides. To find what part of the total load P is carried by the timber sides and by the steel plate respectively, we may let P w and P s represent these loads, so that P w -f P s = P. Also the total load P divides itself between the parts in proportion to their respective rigidities, these rigidities being now MATERIALS UNDER CROSS-BENDING STRESS. 71 taken as the reciprocals of the deflections when expressed in terms of the equal loads W instead of fibre-stresses. From eq. (44) we have R s = -T = pi S and R w = -p = " s -L s i ^W whence we have P 7? F J ft = t = fi ^ (53) But for solid rectangular sections /= -fabh*', hence we have P 9 P w E w b w li w Jut P w = P P s , which substituted in (51) and reduced gives P > = JOIO ( 54 > Similarly, (55) Thus if the depths and thicknesses of the plate and of the timber sides be Inown, the parts of the total load which they will carry can be found from Iquation (54) or (55), or their relative values may be found at once from Iquation (53). EXAMPLE: Dimension aflitclied learn 24 feet long to carry a distributed \oadof2000 Ibs. per foot. Assume a depth of timber sides of 16 inches, and let the plate be the all depth of the timbers. If we use "long-leaf" pine, we may take ?, = 1,400,000, while E s = 28,000,000 for the steel plate. Eq. (50) now / - fives us = . That is, the maximum fibre-stress in the timber sides is j s ~u ne twentieth that in the steel plate. We will also assume the plate to be inch thick. If it is stressed to 20,000 Ibs. per square inch, the load it lone will carry is found from eq. (G). Thus M s = ~ = M =' f ^~> or A = 12,000 Ibs., nearly. |v ; ^is leaves 36,000 pounds to be carried by the timber sides. But when the stress in the plate is 20,000 pounds, that in the timber sides 5 but 1000 pounds. Hence we must now find the combined breadth of the wo sides to carry 36,000 pounds with this fibre-stress. Here again we have M o =f^^, or b w = l^- t = 30 inches, nearly. O *J w tl w 72 THE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. As this thickness is out of the question, we might double the thickness of the steel plate, making it 1 inch, when it will carry 24,000 pounds, leaving 24,000 pounds for the timber sides. This would reduce them to 20 inches in width, or two sticks, 10 in. by 16 in. each. If it were practical to obtain timbers 18 inches deep, they would serve the purpose much better. (The student might redirnension the beam on this assumption.) It is evident from the above that there is no economy in combining iron and wood in this manner. An iron or steel I beam or a plate girder should always be used in such a case when this is practicable. The problem has- been inserted here as a valuable exercise. 49. Steel and Concrete in Combination. It is now common to employ steel wires or bars to strengthen the tension sides of concrete beams. To analyze this case it is necessary to know the modulus of elasticity of the; particular concrete employed, and at the age when its working strength is-* first required. This property of concrete has seldom been observed (see; Chapter XXX), but for good Portland-cement concrete it may be taken at: 1,000,000. For cinder concrete, such as is used in fire-proof flooring int buildings, it is very much less, possibly not over 100,000. Kef erring again to the general proposition that in composite structures the' load divides itself between the systems in direct proportion to their relative- rigidities, we conclude that for like areas, similarly placed, the rigidities are' to each other as their moduli of elasticity. Since the modulus of elasticity of steel is 28,000,000 and of the concrete, say, 1,000,000, it follows that one square inch in section of steel resists for equal deformations as much as 28- square inches of concrete similarly placed. To find the resistance of the- combined material, therefore, substitute an amount of concrete for the steel 1 wire or bar equal to twenty-eight times- its cross-section, adding this in the hori- zontal plane of the steel bar, and then treat this new form of section, as shown in Fig. 50, as an actual beam of concrete. By finding its moment of inertia, the strength of the beam, when the concrete* fails by cracking on the tension side, mayi FIG. 50. Steel and Concrete in , fl Combination. be found from the equation M 9 == ^-, where/ is the ultimate tensile strength of the concrete ; /is the moment of 1 inertia of the transformed section; y l is the distance from the neutral axis> of this section to the tension side of the beam ; and M is the moment of resistance of the actual beam when the concrete cracks.* * For a discussion of the case where the concrete cracks and the elastic limit of the steel bar is reached, as well as for the case where the concrete cracks on the tension side and then fails in compression because of the strength of the steel bar, including also the case here treated, see an article by the author in Engr. News, Jan. 3, 1895, p. 10. MATERIALS UNDER CROSS-BENDING STRESS. 72a If b = breadth of concrete beam, h = height " a = area of steel bar, 77T A = substituted equivalent area of concrete = a ~ 9 E s = modulus of elasticity of steel, E c = " " " " the concrete used, e distance from centre of beam to centre of bar, d " " " " " " new neutral axis, ?/, = " " neutral axis to tension side of beam, y t = " " " compression side of beam, f t = stress on outer portion of the concrete on the tension side, /= " " " " " " " " " compression side, / = moment of inertia of the transformed cross-section, C* -I/" / = stress on outer portion of beam if no steel bar were used = ~ t , Oil' m . -jrf, used for convenience (but is in fact the ratio of the lon- a ti s gitudinal rigidity of the beam to that of the steel bar), then we have Tensile stress on concrete at bottom Compressive stress on con- | _ /. _ My 9 __ crete at top j ~~ * c ~ / ~" ^ 1 + TO+ 12_ If the steel bar be a flat plate and this be placed at the bottom of the beam, but buried in the concrete, then e and we have Tensile stress on concrete at bottom = f t ' = fA - -\ (A') ' \m-\- 4:) and similarly Compressive stress on concrete at top =// =/( -r). (B') If the steel rod, or plate, be removed still farther from the body of the concrete, by placing it in the lower side of a projecting rib of concrete, then e becomes greater than -. Equations (A) and (B) will still apply to this case, 6 merely using the true values of e and h, not counting the projecting rib as any part of the concrete beam. Thus if a concrete floor 4 inches thick be supported by ribs every two feet, in the bottoms of which are steel rods 1 726 THE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. inch square, so placed as to be 10 inches below the centre of the concrete floor, then from equations (A) and (B) we have f> = -f" = - 007/ and f ' = ' = - f GM M where / = m- = OQT- If any particular ratio of compressive to tensile strength of the concrete is to be developed, we may impose the condition^ = &; whence for the steel /* placed at the bottom side of ttye beam we have, from equations (A') and whence, iox = - - \j 9 if __ _ f t m a E s Jc 1 - V)E C Thus if ^ = 5, we have, for ~ = , a = j|. That is to say, if the steel plate covered the entire base of the beam, it would have to be -fa as thick as the concrete and steel combined to satisfy this condition, it being assumed in this and all former cases that the con- crete does not crack on the tension side. Evidently it is impracticable to develop the full compressive strength of the concrete by this construc- tion, on condition that the concrete is to remain unbroken on the tension si'de. To find the total stress in the steel bar, we assume it to stretch the same as the parts of the concrete beam adjacent to it; hence for any given position, distant e from the centre of the beam, we have Total stress on steel bar = ^(e d)-^ a = - - =j (D) /J l + + ljf If e --, this becomes, for the bar at the bottom, Z Total stress on steel lar at bottom ~ 4 ("ir ill ~\~ t\ fv For this case the tensile stress in the steel rod, in pounds per square 7~r Tji inch is -W 1 /,, or it is -^ times as much as that in the concrete adjoining it. H/ c lit c This stress in the steel bar can never be more than from 2000 to 5000 pounds per square inch in rock or gravel concrete, but in cinder concrete it would be very much more. To utilize the strength of the steel, therefore, in rock concrete, it is necessary either to allow the concrete beam to crack on the tension side or to remove the steel bars to the lower portions of projecting ribs. MATERIALS UNDER CROSS-BE2VD1NG STRESS. 73 50. Approximate Determination of the Strength of Flat Plates under formal Forces.* (a) Flat Circular Plate Supported at the Circumference and Uniformly Loaded. Assume a diametral strip 1 in. in width to be loaded over its full width at the ends, but the loaded surface to reduce to a zero width at the centre, this load to be p Ibs. per square inch. The total load on the strip will then be pr, and each end support will be - . The bending moment at the centre will be pr pr pr* M = . r . f r - - (56) But for a solid rectangular section we have M = ^fblf, or, for #, = 1; whence h = r\ l - (58) where h thickness of plate in inches; r = radius of plate " " ; f = stress in extreme fibre in pounds per square inch; p = pressure on plate in " " " " From a very elaborate analysis, Prof. Grashof finds for this case (b) Square Flat Plate Supported at the Periphery and Uniformly Loaded. Since the corners are more distant from the centre and therefore carry a less proportion of the load, we may assume that the opposite sides act inde- pendently, so far as the bending moment at the centre is concerned. On this assumption the plate may be regarded as supported at two sides only and loaded with one-half the actual load, whence we have M Q = ^pW=^fbh\ ........ (59) or 1/4, * = 11 =0.6111, ...... (60) y / / where I = length of one side of the square plate. (c) Same Cases when the Plates are Fixed in Position at their Periph- eries. Since the maximum bending moment on a beam fixed at the ends and uniformly loaded is only J that of a beam supported at the ends and * These proximate solutions are offered as illustrative of simple approximate methods which may often be applied to very complicated problems of this class. 74 THE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. similarly loaded, we may assume the same relations would hold here, thus giving for a circular plate, rigidly held, For a square plate, rigidly held, or (d) For Elliptical and Rectangular Plates. Here the plate fails by cracking along its greater axis; and since the deflection of a beam for a given load is as the cube of the length, it is evident that the ends carry but a small part of the total load. Where the longer axis is more than twice the shorter one, we may neglect these end bearings entirely when we have the case of a flat plate supported at two opposite sides, which then becomes a simple beam: and this is the proper assumption to make in such a case. Making this assumption, and calling b the smaller dimension of the opening, we have Prof. Bach gives for this case where is somewhere between f and 1. When the longer axis is about 1J times the shorter, as is common with manhole- covers, assume that f of the total load is carried at the sides, thus giving, from (64), f- or A - -*' 4 K" - 4 r /" CHAPTER VI. THE RESILIENCE OF MATERIALS. 51. Resilience Defined. Resilience is literally the springing back of a deformed body after the deforming force has been removed. As used in mechanics, however, it is the work done by the body in this springing back, which is the same as the work done on the body in deforming it, so long as this is inside the elastic limits. Beyond the elastic limit the work of deformation always exceeds the work given back by the body. The body then does not fully recover its initial position, shape, or dimensions. Sometimes the work of deformation, whether inside or beyond the elastic limit, is spoken of as the resilience, but this is improper. The resilience proper is the amount of work, or energy, in foot-pounds, ivhich can be stored in an elastic bod?/, up to a given stress per square inch, and which can be given out again by the body as useful work, if desired* That portion of the energy spent in deforming the body but not given back as resilient work is spent in permanently deforming the body, by causing the particles to move or slide over each other, thus developing heat. The elastic deformation of a body does not develop heat. Since work is measured by a force acting over a distance, the work of deformation may be measured by the product of the deforming force into the distance through which it acts. But the deforming force is zero at first and increases uniformly as the deformation increases (inside the elastic limit); hence the total work done in deforming a body is the average value of the force into the total deformation. Since the force increases uniformly with the deformation, its average value is always one half its final value (inside the elastic limit), so that the ivork of deformation, or the energy stored in the body, is one half the product of the final force (or resistance}, into the deformation. Inside the elastic limit the stress-diagram (for all kinds of stress) is a straight line, and here also the resilience, or work given back, is equal to the work of deformation. Hence the elastic resilience is equal to the triangular area of the stress-diagram, included between this curve, the axis of deformation, and an ordinate parallel to the axis of loads, to the extremity of the locus developed. As similar areas are to each other as the squares of their like *This is the sense in which Young first used the term in 1807, but he did not so clearly define it since he assumed bodies to be perfectly elastic to rupture. 75 76 THE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. parts, or dimensions, it is evident that the elastic resilience, or energy, stored in a body is as the square of the unit stress under the finals load, this unit stress being equal or proportional to the load ordinate in the stress- diagram. It will be shown hereafter that this is true for all kinds of resilience, both inside and beyond the elastic limit. 52. Three Varieties of Resilience. There are three kinds of resilience commonly recognized, namely, of tension or compression, of bending, and of torsion. These, of course, correspond to the three corresponding kinds of stresses and deformations. It will be shown below that the elastic resilience of a body, in foot-pounds or inch-pounds, is always equal to the product of three factors, namely : (a) A numerical coefficient, which is different for each of the three kinds of resilience, and for different forms of cross-section, and for different methods of applying the external forces. f* (b) The factor ~, or the square of the maximum stress divided by the modulus of elasticity. (c) The volume of the body. That is to say, for any particular kind of stress and form of cross- section the elastic resilience varies directly as the square of the stress- intensity and as the volume of the body, and inversely as its modulus of elasticity, or f R 8 = lc== . volume (1) That is to say, the resilience, or energy, which can be absorbed, or stored, in a body of a given material and form, up to a given fibre-stress, is no function of the relative dimensions of the body, but only of its volume. In other words, one cubic inch of steel will absorb and give out the same amount of work, or energy, as the same volume of fine wire, if the load is applied in the same manner, or if the stress is of the same kind, so long-as the form of cross-section remains the same.* 53. Resilience a Measure of the Ability of a Body to Resist a Shock or Blow. The magnitude or effect of a blow, or of a falling body, is measured by the energy stored in the moving body at the instant of impact. In the case of a body which has fallen freely in space under the action of gravity, its energy is Wh, where W is the weight of the body (force of gravity), and h is the distance through which the body has fallen freely (distance through which the force of gravity has acted). In any case, the energy of the body Wv* is - , where v is the velocity in feet per second, and g is the acceleration. y * When the stress is direct (tension or compression), the form of cross-section is immaterial. In bending and torsion, however, the form of section is important. THE RESILIENCE OF MATERIALS. 77 of the force of gravity, or 32 feet per second. If a moving body, as a falling weight, is stopped by striking a fixed solid body, which is here assumed to be a test specimen, the energy of the moving body is spent in one or all of the following ways : (a) In deforming the moving body itself, either within or beyond its elastic limit. (b) In a local deformation of both bodies at the surface of contact, within or beyond the elastic limit. (c) In moving the fixed body as a whole, with an accelerated velocity, the resistance consisting of the inertia of the body. (d) In moving the fixed body against its external supports and resistances. (e) Finally, in deforming the fixed body as a whole against the resisting stresses developed thereby. If the moving body be very hard and rigid; if the surfaces of contact are comparatively unyielding; if the specimen have a small mass as compared to the moving body, and if it be very rigidly supported upon or against a very great mass or weight which is relatively unyielding; and, finally, if the spec- imen which is to receive and absorb the energy of the blow is quite yield- ing or flexible, and in short if there is nearly absolute rigidity in all parts of the apparatus except in the body struck, and if this yields only as a whole and not at the. point of contact or at its supports, then, and only then, can nearly all the energy of the moving or falling body be absorbed by the deflection or stretch or compression or twisting of the specimen. It is prac- ticable, by making the energy of the falling body consist mostly of weight, and only to a small degree of velocity, that is, by having a heavy weight drop through a short distance, to absorb up- wards of 90$ of it in the specimen. It goes without saying that it is impossible to get it all stored in the specimen under any circumstances; and if great care is not exercised in arranging the test, but a very small percentage may be given over to the specimen, the rest being dissipated in the other ways named above. In the stress-diagram shown in Fig. 51 let the vertical ordlnate represent total resistance in pounds and the hor- izontal ordinate represent deformation of the body, as a whole, measured at the point of contact, in inches; whether this deformation be a bending, extension, compression, or twist is not now material, formed to d l it is resisting this action with a force of p When this body has been de- when deformed 78 THE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. to t/ 2 it is resisting with a force of p^ , etc. When the deformation passes the elastic limit the resistance does not increase as rapidly as the deformation, and hence the diagram is no longer a straight line, but becomes curved. A deformation of d 3 now develops a resistance of p z , and d 4 of p 4 , etc. Now since the work of resistance is the sum of the products of the in- stantaneous resistances into the corresponding deformations, it is properly represented by the area of the stress diagram up to the maximum deforma- tion and resistance. That is to say, the work done on the body to deflect or deform it to d l is indicated by the area of oq l d l , the work required to de- form it to d 9 , and also the energy stored in the body when deformed to this point, is indicated by the area oq 9 d^ , etc. So long as the point q falls on the stress diagram inside the elastic limit, this amount of energy stored will all be given back again by the body. But when this point q falls beyond the elas- tic limit point of the diagram, the body is no longer able to fully recover its original form, but it remains permanently deformed. The amount of- this permanent set can always be found by dropping lines q t q 9 'q 4 q t ' 9 etc., from the extremity of the diagram which marks the maximum load imposed, parallel to the straight portion of the curve. These lines are the return paths which i the specimen follows on the removal of the deforming forces or loads. They ! are always parallel to the elastic path of the body, or to that part of the curve below the elastic limit. This is true for all kinds of stresses and dia- grams, whether tension, compression, bending, or torsion; and whether the vertical ordinate represents total loads or resistances, or loads per square inch, or intensities of stress on extreme fibres. In case the specimen has had to absorb an amount of energy, or work, , represented by the area oq^d^, therefore, it will give back only so much as is represented by the area q 3 'q 3 d 3 . The remainder, oq a q a ', represents work which has been spent in permanently deforming the specimen, and which it can never give back, this having been transformed into heat by friction. Under our definition of resilience, therefore, we should have to say that the resilience of the specimen, for the resistance p a , is q 3 'q 3 d 3 , and not the full area 0^3. This latter represents the work done in deforming the specimen,, but it cannot properly be called resilience. Similarly, when the body is dis- torted to d t with a developed resistance of p^ the resilience now is q^^^,* and oq 4 q t ' has been lost in the permanent deformation of the specimen, or in heat. The student will readily perceive that the areas of the triangles whose bases are od l} od^, q 3 'd 3 , and q/d t , respectively, are to each other as the squares of these bases, or as the squares of their altitudes, p l , p^ , p s , and p t , respec- tively, since they are all similar, their sides being parallel. If their altitudes represented stresses per square inch, which they might, then we could say the resilience of this specimen varied as the square of the stress developed in it, as stated in Art. 52, and as will be further shown analytically, whether this maximum stress be inside or beyond the elastic limit. THE RESILIENCE OF MATERIALS. 79 Thus far in studying Fig. 51 we have spoken of the "work of deforma- tion " without stating whether this work was developed bv a load slowly ap- plied, or by one quickly applied, as by a falling weight. In fact it does not matter how this work is done, a given number of foot-pounds of en- ergy producing exactly the same ef- fect, and developing the same stress diagram, provided we assume that all the energy of the quickly applied load goes into the specimen, to pro- duce this particular deformation. This conclusion is also based on another assumption, which is, that the relation betiveen the deformation and g^ its corresponding resistance devel- oped in the body is the same for a def- ormation produced suddenly as for ^ one produced by a slower application of external force. This equality of relationship has never been shown, as between static and impact applica- is Drobable FlG ' 52 '~ Showin that a reater . impact stress is required to produce a given de- formation. 344.) (Fr. Com. Rep., vol. n. p. tions of the load; but it ithat this relation is very nearly inde- pendent of time, inside the elastic limit, and with brittle bodies up to rupture, since it is in this case a molec- iular resistance to relative deformation, and not a resistance to t flow or rel- iative displacement. In the case of plastic or ductile bodies, however, it has jbeen shown that beyond the elastic limit the stress diagrams developed by impact and by static loads are very different, the former being in the case of soft iron wire some 30$ greater in area. This means that for such mate- rials the actual energy absorbed by the specimen under impact is some 30$ more than it is under a static load. See Fig. 52. Assuming now that all the energy of a blow is spent in deforming the specimen in the manner represented on the static stress-diagram, we come to this very important conclusion: the energy of the blow, in foot-pounds, is equal to the area of the stress-diagram developed by that blow, properly eval- uated to the scales of the drawing, when this diagram is drawn to co-ordi- nates representing deformation and resistance thereto. Thus if a weight falls on a body, as a beam, and if we may assume that very little of the energy spends itself otherwise than in bending the specimen, if .the speci- men deflects by the amount d^ , for instance, then we" assume that the corre- sponding resistance at the instant of maximum deflection is p^, and that the energy of the blow was somewhat greater than the area oq //; or by know- 80 THE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. ing the energy of the falling body ( Wli), and observing the deflection pro- duced, we could determine the amount of energy absorbed by the specimen if we only had a stress-diagram of this specimen under impact, as shoivn in Fig. 52. Few such diagrams have ever been obtained. It has been custom- ary to use for this purpose static test-diagrams, carried beyond the elastic limit, and perhaps to failure. This, of course, destroys the specimen for impact tests; but by having two specimens, presumably just alike, a static test may be made on one of them, from which a static stress-diagram can be drawn, and then the impact test on the other specimen can be interpreted by this static diagram. Having done this, we should still fail to find the area of stress-diagram developed by a single blow fully equal to the energy of the blow, because of the dissipation of a portion of this energy in other ways, and also because the impact stress-diagram lies above, or outside of, the static diagram. It is common to test materials by means of falling weights, and often the height of drop is regularly increased until failure occurs. Let us follow the course of such a test, referring again to Fig. 51. Thus we will suppose all the energy of the blow goes into the specimen (or it would serve as well to suppose a certain fixed percentage is absorbed by the specimen), and that the first blow deformed the specimen to d l , the second to d^ , the third to 6? 8i and the fourth to d t . Now what were the energies of these blows, if all went into the specimen each time ? Evidently the energy of the first blow was that indicated by the area oq^l^ of the second by oq^d^ of the third by oq^d^ and of the fourth by q^q^q^d^. Thus we see that all the first area; is included in the second, all of both first and second in the third, and i large part of the third (q s 'q z d s ) in the fourth. These areas are therefore not mutually exclusive, so that the sum of the energies of all the blow* (2W7i) is not equal to the total area of the stress-diagram developed b} them, oq 4 d t . Neither is the energy of the last blow equal to this area, and in fact there is no relation between the total area of the stress-diagrams oq 4 d 4 , and the energy of one or all of the blows given. If we now add to this statement the evident fact that we can never know in practice whai portion of the energy of any blow is spent in deforming the specimen (ano often we cannot tell what this proportion is within over 50$, and sometime) 1 it has been assumed that it all went into the specimen when there could no- have been more than five per cent of it so spent !), it becomes patent thai NO ABSOLUTE CONCLUSION WHATEVER CAN BE BASED ON IMPACT TESTS Some relative conclusions may be drawn by subjecting two or more liki specimens to exactly identical treatment and finding which withstands thlj greater number of blows. Even then the apparent relative strength depend' largely on wliat particular magnitude of blow be selected for making tests Also a very small difference (apparently) in the character of the foundawH on which the specimen rests may make a very great difference in the per centage of the total energy which goes into the specimen. Hence suc!> THE RESILIENCE OF MATERIALS. 81 omparative tests should always be made on the same foundation, and all he elements of the test exactly duplicated.* In order to obtain the absolute characteristics of any material, a com- dete stress-diagram should be obtained by static tests. The area of such a iagram up to its elastic limit indicates the total energy of the single shock r blow it could withstand up to that limit, or without taking a permanent et (provided this energy all went into the specimen), and the area of this- .iagram, up to rupture, indicates the total energy of the single blow it ould absorb without actually breaking. It must also be observed that in addition to the impact stress being reater for given deformations, beyond the elastic limit with ductile mate- ials, the total elongation at rupture is also much greater when produced by sudden blow than when produced in a static test, and hehce the area of tie stress diagram thus developed may be very much larger than the static- jest diagram on the same material. For an absolute measure of a given material to withstand a shock or low, therefore, it is necessary to give it a static test in some kind of a test- bg-machine, whether this test be in tension, or in compression, or in cross- lending, or in torsion. Then the area of the stress-diagram up to the elastic imit, divided by the volume of the specimen under test, is a. measure of the bility of the material, per unit of volume, to absorb and give out energy ', r to resist repeated shocks without injury ; and the total area of the stress- liagram is its measure to resist a single blow without rupture.\ It is necessary in this connection to guard, the student against several iaisconceptions. (a) By a " slow " or " static " test is meant such a gradual imposition of he load as will give to the moving parts an inappreciable velocity, or nomentum, or vis viva. Evidently any ordinary test in a testing-machine ulfils this condition. (b) By an impact test, or a shock, or a blow, is meant a genuine striking >r impact, in which the force of the blow is nearly all due to the speed or velocity of the moving body or falling weight, and only slightly due to its static weight alone. (c) Aside from the two methods which alone have been under dis- cussion in this article, there is another method of loading, called a " sudden imposition of load." Thus in the case of placing a load on a beam, if the load be brought into contact with the beam, but its weight sus- tained by external means, as by a cord, and then this external support be *lt is not uncommon to find impact tests described by giving only the weight of hammer and height of fall, with no description of the character of the supports. It has also been customary to rest stamp-mills on spring-timbers to lessen the force of the blow ! f Except that for ductile materials, in which the impact stress-diagram is greater than the static stress-diagram, as shown in Fig. 52. 82 THE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. suddenly (instantaneously) removed, as by quickly cutting the cord, thei although the load is already touching the beam (and hence there is no re; impact), yet the beam is at first offering no resistance, as it has as y< suffered no deformation. Furthermore, as the beam deflects the resistam increases, but does not come to be equal to the load until it has attained ii normal deflection. In the meantime there has been an unbalanced force ( gravity acting, of a constantly diminishing amount, equal at first to th entire load, but now reduced to zero when the resistance has come to t equal to the load, at the normal deflection. But at this instant both th load and the beam are in motion, the hitherto unbalanced force having pn duced an accelerated velocity, and this velocity of the weight and beai gives to them an energy, or vis viva, which must now spend itself in ove: coming an excess of resistance over and above the imposed load, and th whole mass will not stop until the deflection (as well as the resistance) he come to be equal to twice that corresponding to the static load imposet Hence we say the effect of a suddenly imposed load is to produce twice th deflection and stress of the same load statically placed. It must be eviden- however, that this case has nothing in common with either the ordinal) " static" tests of structural materials in testing-machines, or with impac tests. It is introduced here to prevent a confusion of mind in these mattei often found to exist with persons whose conceptions of such problems i mechanics are not clear. 54. Resilience Areas in Stress-diagrams. It was shown in the previoo article, in discussing Fig. 51, that the shaded triangular areas represents the resilience of the specimen for the several loads imposed. It will now fc shown that these areas may be represented as one figure with continuousl' added increments. Referring again to Fig. 51, if the permanent set, oq s , be laid off on p^ from p 3 giving q 9 ", oq t on p 4 q t from p 4 giving rm cross-section and of a definite length is subjected to the action of xternal forces, producing direct tension or compression, the deformation rod need in the body, from eq. (2), Chapter I, is a = '-^. If A = the lit ross-section of the body, then the total external force applied is P =. pA. he total external work is then Pa _pA pi _ 1 p* T '~2'^~2W Al (3> But since this is equal to the internal work of resistance, and since I volume of the specimen, we have 1 ff R d resilience in direct stress .-^ . volume; ... (3) & -& r per unit of volume, *=*f <*> Since p and E are given in pounds per square inch, the volume must so be in cubic inches. If p is made equal to the elastic limit of the material, the corresponding alue of r d is the primitive elastic resilience in inch-pounds per cubic inch. eyond the elastic limit, the elastic resilience is indicated by the triangles Va^s* y/Vtd*! e tc., in Fig. 51, corresponding in each case to the new or irtificially-raised elastic limits p a , p t , etc. These subsequent elastic resili- ence values may be called the artificially-raised elastic resilience. As defined in the previous article, all resilience is elastic resilience, but :he term "elastic" is retained here in order to insure that it is not confused vvith the term "total resilience," which is sometimes misused and made to nean the total area of the stress-diagram, which the author of this work vvill not admit is resilience in any sense. 56. Resilience in Cross-bending. The deflections of beams loaded and supported in different ways, in terms of the stress on the extreme fibre, are * When the stress passes a maximum and both these curves begin to descend, the included area here becomes negative. f True under the author's definition of resilience, but not true when this term is made to mean the work or energy absorbed instead of the energy given back. THE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. given in column four of the table on pages 62-65. For any case the /7 2 deflection may be represented by the term k '~r 9 where k is a numerical coefficient which varies for the different cases, but the values of which are given in that table. Since the resilience of a beam when developed by falling weights, or other impact loads, would produce deflections corre- sponding to concentrated loads, only concentrated-load deflections as given in the table need be here considered. Thus, for a beam supported at the^ ends and loaded at the centre, the deflection, in terms of the stress on the 1 outer fibre, is A = - ~r. But the load which will produce the stress /"on Jjjil the outer fibre is (see column five of table) P = -. The external work; done on the beam in deflecting it, which must equal the internal work of ! resistance, or the resilience, if / is inside the elastic limit, is - r i Resilience = = -.-.1 For a solid rectangular cross-section, / = Substituting this in eq. (5), we have Resilience of a solid rectangular beam loaded at the centre and supported at the ends = 1 /" 2 1 /' 2 . ^ . bhl = . --JT . volume. lo Hi lo HJ (6) If the bending moment had been uniform throughout its length, as i& the case with a spiral or helical spring when under a bending stress, the movement of one end of the spring should be determined, and this multi- plied by one half the final force applied at this point. But since the internal work of resistance is always equal to the external work of deforma-i tion, we may measure up the internal work and call this the resiliences The case of a beam (or a spring) under a uniform bending moment is a favorable case for this purpose. Thus -assume a spiral or helical spring made of a steel bar having a rectangular cross-section whose original- dimensions were I, b, and h. When coiled into a spring (the dimensions oi the coil being immaterial for our purpose) and a couple producing bending moment applied to it, thus developing in the spring throughout its entire length a moment oi> resistance which we will suppose is such as to give rise to the elastic-limit stress / on the outer fibres throughout the entire length of the coiled bar, we are to measure up the total internal work of resistance, or th( energy thus stored in the spring. Since the fibre-stress is uniformly vary- FIG. 53. THE RESILIENCE OF MATERIALS. 85 ag across the section of the bar, and is /on the outer fibres on each side, 3 is evident that il 2f The stress on any fibre = p = ay = f ~-y 9 . . . (7) y i 'here y = distance of fibre from neutral axis, and y^ = distance of outer fibre from neutral axis = ; f = stress per square inch on outer fibre. But The stretch of any fibre = a = -~r = -by* .... (8) here p = stress per square inch; / length of bar of which spring is composed; E = modulus of elasticity. Therefore 2^2 ^ The ivork of resistance of any fibre = - . -=-, . y*. . . (9) J^J fir The work of resistance of any zone of fibres bdy in area of cross-section, istant y from the neutral axis, would be - . ^ . y*dy, and r + Y he total work of resistance = resilience = R = I L. _ . J h E li y*dy _/' . N. *! - L.f- m i~^ y 13-6 ^ ~ 2 ~ 2 1 /"' = -p. volume of spring ... .......... . . (10) Comparing this with eq. (5) we see that fifty per cent more energy can e absorbed by a beam or spring when subjected to a uniform bending tioment than when the moment increases uniformly from the ends to the entre, or from one end to the other, 57. Resilience in Torsion. Referring to Fig. 23 we see that the external pork is , where is the distortion angle and a length of arm of the ouple, whose forces are P. But from eq. (14), Chapter III, when the aoment Pa is on the specimen the stress on the outer fibre is = -& or Uso, from eq. (15), 2Pal 86 THE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. Pa6 -rr,we Substituting here the value of Pa above, we have %nr*E ~ 2 rJ Combining this with the value of Pa again to get the value of have ~P 'n f) \ f 2 Work of torsion on solid cylinder = -.%-. 7tr*l 2 8 E = IT E' volume - 58. Comparative Resilience of Bodies under Different Kind of Stress. For bodies of uniform cross-section we have the following table of values of resilience in inch-pounds per cubic inch, and their relative capacities to ab- sorb and give out energy, taking the capacity in direct stress as unity. COMPARATIVE RESILIENCE OF BODIES. Figure. Kinds of Stress. Resilience in inch- pounds per cubic inch. = r. Relative Capacity for Absorbing and Giving out Energy. 22 '///M L T W///////, Direct tension or compression. H'W 1 \f Cross-bending with bending moment uniformly increas- ing longitudinally. 1 /* US' E i 9 'x I HSi ! i U^ ^VJ 1 iS^ 1 jjjjii^ \ Cross -bending with bending moment uniform longitudi- nally. i r 6 ' E 1 3 f C ( v Ei'iiljii! !ii!!/t izfomnA) py i 1 < Torsion. 5 / 2 5 _ _ 8 ' E EXAMPLES ON PART I. 86a EXAMPLES ON PART I. 1. A section of a steel bar 1 in. in diameter and 8 in. long elongates 0.01 in. for an increase in tensile stress of 30,000 Ibs. What is the modulus of elasticity ? 2. What reduction in temperature would bring a wrought-iron bar, immovably fixed at its ends, to its elastic limit of 26,000 Ibs. tensile stress per square inch? Take E = 28,000,000 and the coefficient of expansion = 0.0000065 per degree F. Am. 142. 8 3. Find the proportionate change in volume of a brass cube which is subjected to a compress! ve stress in one direction of 10,000 Ibs. per square inch. Take E 15,000,000. What is its change in volume for a fluid pressure of this amount in all directions? Ans. 0.00023- ; 0.00069. 4. What is the shearing modulus of elasticity for steel if # = 29,000,000 and Poisson's ratio = 0.27 ? Ans. E 8 = 0.39^. 5. Find the modulus of elasticity of steel from Fig. 6, making allowance for the locus cutting the vertical axis at 1000 pounds above the origin. Use the deformation of 0.001 and its corresponding stress-increment in pounds per square inch. From the same diagram find the elastic limit, the ultimate strength, and the percentage of elongation. 6. The following is a record of a test on cast iron : Loads per square inch in pounds 1000 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 31040 Proportionate deforma- tions .00022.00055 .00097 .00150 .00220 .00368 broke Plot this record and determine from it: (1) The modulus of elasticity; (2) The ap- parent elastic limit ; (3) The total percentage of elongation (by extending the plotted curve till the breaking load is reached); (4) The work required to break the speci- men in foot-pounds per cubic inch of metal (obtained by finding the area of the diagram and evaluating it to the scales of the drawing, see Art. 53). 7. Assume a brick to be 8 in. long, 4 in. wide, and 2 in. thick. From equation (12), p. 31, find the relative crushing strength of the brick per unit area when i tested flatwise, edgewise, and endwise, taking the strength of a cubical specimen of ! the same material as unity. Ans. 1.22; 0.89; and 0.83. 8. A stone cube two inches on a side has its edges chamfered or rounded so that the bearing surfaces are but 1.8 in. square. What is its total crushing strength as compared to the strength of a full cube ? What is its strength per square inch of bearing-surface as compared to the strength per square inch of a full cube ? (See Fig. 18.) Ans. 85 per cent; 103 per cent. 9. By how much is a centrally loaded column 12 in. square weakened by adding four inches of the same material to one side of the column without shifting the load ? Ans. The maximum stress in the column is increased by 31 per cent. 10. A steel rod 1/4 in. in diameter and 30 in. long is used as a torsional spring for closing a door. What will be the increase in the moment of torsion from giving the rod an additional twist through 90, the shearing modulus of elasticity being taken as 12,000,000 ? What will be the maximum increased shearing stress in the rod due to this angular movement ? What will be the increase in the force required to hold the door in this position, the door-knob being 30 inches from the hinges? Ans. 244 inch- pounds; 78,500 Ibs. per square inch ; 8 pounds. 11. A wooden beam 8 in. by 16 in. in cross-section and 20 ft. long carries a uniform load of 1000 Ibs. per running foot. Find the maximum direct stress on the outer fibres and the maximum shearing stress in the beam. A j 1170 Ibs. per square inch direct stress; Ans. | 11? k4 tl tl M shearing u 12. For the same beam and load as in Ex. 11, find the deflection of the beam, taking E = 1,200,000. If the deflection were observed to be 3/4 in., what would be the modulus of elasticity? Ans. 1.1 in deflection; 1,760,000 modulus. 13. A flitched beam is composed of two sticks 4 in. by 16 in. by 16 ft. long-, and a steel plate 3/4 in. by 16 in. of the same length, and carries a load of 2000 pounds 866 THE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. per running foot. Find the portion of the load carried by each part, the maximum fibre-stresses resulting, and the deflection at the centre, taking E = 80,000,000 for the steel and 1.500,000 for the timber A S Steel: 1305 Ibs. per foot; 15,660 Ibs. ; 0.25 inch. \ Timber: 695 " " " 782 " " " 14. How many foot-pounds of energy per pound of steel can be stored in a steel helical or spiral spring coiled about an axle, by winding it up until the stress in the outer fibre is 80,000 Ibs. per square inch, E being taken equal to 30,000,000 ? Am. 17.8. 15. How much would such a spring weigh which could absorb the energy of a street-car weighing 20,000 Ibs., and moving at the rate of six miles per hour on a down grade just sufficient to overcome the frictional resistances ? Would the size of the cross-section of such a spring affect its necessary weight ? Could such a spring be designed so as to reach this fibre-stress when the car had stopped, and also so as to be exerting the maximum torsional moment on the car- axle without causing the wheels to slip ? Is such a device practicable ? * Am. 2315 Ibs. 16. To what extent can energy be stored in metallic springs of any sort ? Could they ever be used for the storing of motive power ? (This has often been attempted.) 17. A pendulum, mounted on knife-edges, weighs 50 Ibs., and its centre of gravity is 8 feet from the pivot-supports. It is moved to an angle of 30 from the vertical, and is allowed to swing and strike the centre of a cast-iron bar 1 in. square, resting on absolutely rigid supports (or assumed to be such) 2 feet apart. The pendulum in falling breaks the bar and moves a horizontal distance of 24 in. beyond its true ver- tical position before it comes to a stop. What is the shock- resisting capacity of the iron in inch- pounds per cubic inch of metal in cross-breaking under a concentrated load? Ans.ZOA. 18. Assuming the stress-diagram of a static test of such a bar in cross-bending to be a triangle, what would its final deflection be if the breaking load were such as to correspond to a modulus of rupture of 40,000 Ibs. per square inch ? Ans. 0.88 inch. * This is a favorite device with " car-starter" inventors. See an article by the Author in Jour. Assc, Eng. Socs., vol. iv. p. 393. PART II. MANUFACTURE AND GENERAL PROPERTIES OF THE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. CHAPTER VII. CAST IRON. GENERAL CLASSIFICATION OF IKON AND STEEL. 59. Importance of the Subject. While the use of iron in a small way, for offensive and defensive weapons of war and for utensils, is doubtless older than authentic history,* it is only since its manufacture has become possible on a grand scale, by the aid of steam-power, that it has become a common material of engineering and architectural construction. It has now nearly replaced the use of timber in engineering works, and it is rapidly replacing the use of wood, stone, and brick in architeccural designing. So dependent now are all kinds of construction on the use of iron, that the condition of the iron-manufacturing industry is universally regarded as a true index of the general state of trade and commerce the world over. Since iron, therefore, in its various states, is more used in engineering construc- tion than all other kinds of materials combined, a corresponding amount of space is given to a study of it in this work.f * There is now in the British Museum () a sickle-blade found by Belzoni under the base of a sphinx near Thebes; (&) a blade found by Col. Vyse embedded in the mortar of one of the Pyramids ; (c) a portion of a cross-cut saw exhumed by Layajd at Nimroud. These may be of meteoric origin. The reason more specimens of iron and steel are not found may be due, however, to their rapid oxidation when exposed to air and moisture. The stone and bronze implements have resisted this action, and hence many have assumed that in the "stone " and " bronze " ages no iron was in use. f A chronological review of the greatest discoveries and inventions in iron manufac- ture is here given : 4000 B c. to | Wrought iron by the direct process from the ore in small quantities about 1500 A. D. ) by means of charcoal, and this made into cement- or blister-steel. About 1500 A.D. Cast iron made in Germany with charcoal. 1620-1735. Cast-iron made by Dud Dudley in England with coke, but the prac- 87 88 TEE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. 60. Classifications of Iron and Steel. Iron and steel may be classified according to its qualities, structure, and composition, or according to its methods of manufacture. Apparently the former is the more significant basis of classification, but in English- and French-speaking countries the latter basis has come to be universally adopted. We will, however, here first classify these products according to their more significant qualities (the method used in Germany). IRON AND STEEL CLASSIFIED ACCORDING TO QUALITIES. Malleable. Cast, when molten, into a malleable mass or ingot. Ingot Iron cannot be hardened by sudden cooling. Ingot Steel can be hardened by sudden cooling. Aggregated from pasty particles without subsequent fusion (puddling process). tice lapsed till revived in 1735 by Abraham Darby. Blast from leather bellows driven by water-power. 1740. Cement-steel melted in crucibles by Huntsman near Sheffield, England. 1760. The steam-engine of Watt applied to produce the blast for making pig- iron, and to drive rolls and hammers in working the wrought iron and steel. 1783-4. Grooved rolls of various forms, driven by the steam-engine, and wrought iron made from pig iron by "dry-puddling," both by Cort, England. White iron used in the "dry" process. These inventions lie at the base of the supremacy of Great Britain in the iron trades. 1829. Hot blast, used in blast-furnaces in Scotland by Neilson, thus greatly cheapening the cost of production. 1830. The "wet-puddling" process of making wrought-iron, or "pig-boil- ing," introduced by J. Hall, England. 1840. Use of manganese in making crucible cast steel, introduced at Sheffield by /. M. Heath, which reduced the cost of steel by 50 per cent. 1856. The Bessemer process of making steel, patented by Sir Henry Bessemer in England (son of a French refugee, born 1813), this " being of far more importance to the world than all the gold of California and Australia." 1861. Invention of the regenerative gas furnace by Sir W. Siemens in Eng- land (born in Hanover, 1823), and educated at the Magdeburg Poly- technicum and at Gottingen). 1863. Application of the Siemens furnace to the open-hearth process of mak- ing steel by P. and E. Martin in France, thus originating the Sie- mens-Martin process of steel-making now employed for nearly all the soft and mild steel used in structural work, and for steel castings. 1878. The invention of the basic process of making steel, by which the phos- phorus of the ore is eliminated, by 8. G. Thomas and P. C. Gilchrist (cousins) in England. (First public demonstration April 4, 1879.) By this process the range of ores which can be used for steel-making- is enormously increased, especially in Europe, while it is used often. in America. CAST IRON. 89 Weld Iron cannot be hardened by sudden cooling. Weld Steel can be hardened by sudden cooling. Semi-malleable. Steel Castings malleable metal cast into final forms. Malleable Cast Iron non-malleable metal (cast iron) cast into final forms and then brought to a semi-malleable condition. Non-malleable. Cast Iron. Hard Cast Steel. The significant criterion here employed to distinguish between iron and steel consists in the hardening effects of sudden cooling from a bright-red heat. This is not a very satisfactory criterion, however, since all such metal is hardened somewhat by sudden cooling. What are commonly known as wrought iron and steel, however, are made by radically different processes one being the formation of the product in a melted, or liquid, state and then casting it into a mould, forming what is called an ingot; the other consisting in forming the product in a pasty or spongy state in a bath of melted or liquid foreign matter, from which it is lifted and immediately forged or rolled. When formed in the melted state it is purified from all foreign matter except such as enters into its own composition, while when formed in the pasty or spongy state, in a bath of melted foreign matter, a considerable proportion of this foreign matter or slag is, of necessity, lifted out with the pasty aggregation, called a " puddle-ball," and some of this slag remains distributed through the iron even after it is rolled, thus giving it a kind of fibre or grain. While, therefore, the mechanical qualities of the puddled product may be almost identical with those of the cast product, there is always a sufficient difference in their structure, resulting from the radical differences in their methods of manufacture, to clearly distinguish them by simply examining the fracture, and to warrant a classification on this basis also: and this is the customary basis of classification in this country.* We have, therefore, IRON AND STEEL CLASSIFIED ACCORDING TO METHOD OF MANUFAC- TURE. Malleable. Wrought Iron rolled or forged from a puddle-ball; it contains slag and other impurities, and cannot be hardened by sudden cooling. Steel rolled or forged from a cast ingot and free from slag and similar matter. * It has also been recommended by a sub-committee of the recent French Commis- sion. 90 THE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. Soft Steel will weld (with care), and cannot be hardened by sudden cooling (Ingot Iron). Same uses as Wrought Iron. Medium Steel will weld imperfectly except by electricity), and will not harden by sudden cooling. Used in Structural Work. Hard Steel will not weld, and will harden by sudden cooling. Tool-steel, Spring-steel, etc. Semi-malleable. Steel Castings Malleable metal cast into final forms. Malleable Cast Iron non-malleable metal cast into final forms and then brought to a semi-malleable condition. Non-malleable. Cast Iron. Hard Cast Steel. Neither of these classifications must be construed too rigidly, but they fairly define the common usage, so far as the employment of these materials in engineering design is concerned. THE PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF CAST IRON. 61. General View. While cast iron has been known and commonly em- ployed since the Middle Ages, it has not been critically and scientifically studied till within a very few years. In the last quarter of a century, the attention of metallurgists engaged in iron-manufacturing industries has been almost wholly confined to the manufacture of steel. The great advances which have been made in this direction have caused cast iron to be very largely replaced by steel in structural designing, and in other directions, and since 1885 steel has also been cast in final forms, the same as cast iron, so that the use of cast iron has been very much diminished, relatively to the total iron and steel output. For many purposes, however, cast iron will probably never be replaced by any other material, especially since great improvements have been made in this direction, as a result of scientific study and experiments devoted in recent years to the manufacture of cast iron. Much of the matter here given on this subject has been quoted directly from the Metallurgy of Iron by Thomas Turner, Associate of the Royal School of Mines, England. This work was published in 1895 and contains the latest results of scientific research on the subject there treated.* 62. General Properties." Cast iron consists of metallic iron, together with at least 1.5 per cent of carbon. It also contains silicon, sulphur, phos- phorus, manganese, and other elements in greater or less proportion, but these may be regarded as impurities, though their presence is often useful or even necessary for the purposes for which cast iron is applied. The pro- * When not otherwise credited the quoted paragraphs are from this work. (Chas, Griffin & Co., London, and Lippincott, Philadelphia.) CAST IRON. 91 portion of elements other than iron is usually about 7 per cent of the total weight, though this varies considerably and is sometimes very much more. Cast iron is fusible at a temperature of about 1200 C. (2200 F.); when cold it is hard and brittle, some varieties being much more so than others; it is not malleable or ductile, like wrought iron or mild steel, nor can it be hardened and tempered like ordinary carbon steel, f^he iron-founder distin- guishes between pig iron, or the form in which the metal is obtained from the blast-furnace, and cast iron, or the form it assumes after it has been again melted; but no such difference is recognized by the chemist, and pjer iron is merely a variety of cast iron which is produced in a particular formTN 63. Carbon in Cast Iron. " Cast iron, when fused, consists of a saturatecTf or nearly saturated, solution of carbon in iron. The amount of carbon which molten iron can thus dissolve is about 3J per cent of its own weight, though the solubility is largely influenced by the presence of other elements. With much chromium the maximum solubility of about 12 per cent of car- bon is reached; with much manganese up to 7 per cent of carbon may be dissolved; while with about 20 per cent of silicon the minimum solubility of carbon is obtained, and only about 1 per cent of carbon then dissolves. Apart from special alloys, such as those mentioned, it is very unusual to meet with less than 2 per cent or more than 4.5 per cent of carbon in cast iron. " So long as iron containing some 3 per cent of carbon remains in the fluid condition the composition is uniform throughout, and the carbon has no tendency to separate from the metal, except with very gray iron; in this case a layer of graphite, which often occurs in beautiful plates and is known as kish, may be formed. But when the molten cast iron is cooled to a tem- perature at which it begins to solidify, it may either retain tke carbon and solidify in a relatively homogeneous form, called white iron; or it may, in solidifying, precipitate the greater part of the carbon in the form of small scales of graphite, which, being entangled by, and uniformly distributed through, the iron, impart to it a somewhat spongy nature, and produce the dark color and soft character met with in gray iron. When about half of the carbon is precipitated as graphite, and the rest retained in combination, the result is the production of dark gray portions in a matrix of white, and the iron is then said to be mottled. " The condition which the carbon assumes on the solidification of the mass is dependent partly on the rate of cooling, and still more on the nature and quantity of the associated elements. In connection with the influence of cooling, cast iron obeys the laws which govern other solu- tions, for it is well known that slow cooling assists the production of crystals, and leads to the formation of crystals of larger size, -while with rapid cooling both solvent and the substance dissolved may solidify together. In a similar manner slow cooling tends to produce graphitic carbon, and the slower the cooling the larger are the flakes of graphite which sepa- 92 THE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. rate. Some kinds of white iron may thus be rendered * gray by slow cool- ing, while some kinds of gray iron may be made perfectly white by rapid cooling or 'chilling/ It is, however, only with intermediate irons that the rate of cooling produces a marked effect, for irons which are either very white or very gray cannot be changed in this manner. The influence exerted on the condition of the carbon by the other elements present in cast iron is of the greatest importance; thus manganese and chromium, which increase the solubility of carbon in iron, lead to a greater percentage of total carbon in the fluid metal, and when the iron solidifies this carbon is retained in solution, so that irons rich in manganese and chromium are white and no amount of slow cooling will alter this character. On the other hand, v silicon and aluminum diminish the solubility of carbon in iron; if much of either of these elements be present in the fluid metal, it is capable of dis- solving less carbon, and retains it with less energy when it solidifies; as a result the carbon is precipitated as graphite, and gray iron is produced. Just as irons which contain much manganese or chromium are permanently white, so metal rich in silicon or aluminum is permanently gray. " The proportion of total carbon in iron to be employed for a given pur- pose is often of secondary importance; it is governed by furnace conditions, and by the proportion of other elements. A moderate alteration in total car- bon, or in the graphite, will frequently have little effect on the physical properties of the product, while a small change in the combined carbon will profoundly alter the strength and hardness of the casting. Probably no other constituent in cast iron is of importance equal to that of combined carbon, and the influence of the other elements is largely due to the effect they produce in increasing or diminishing the combined carbon. The following percentages of combined carbon will usually be found suitable for the pur- poses specified: * Combined Carbon in parts of one per cent. Extra soft siliceous gray iron 0.08 Soft cast iron 0.15 Maximum tensile strength 0.47 Maximum transverse strength 0.70 Maximum crushing strength over 1.00 These figures are, however subject to some variation according to the size of the casting and the proportion of other elements. The hardness of the metal increases regularly with the increase of combined carbon." 64. Silicon in Cast Iron. "All cast iron contains silicon, in quantities * Chemical ingredients of iron and steel are always given in hundredths of one per cent. Thus " twenty carbon " and " eight phosphorus " signifies 0.20 and 0.08 of one per cent of each, respectively. Even the common workmen use these terms, though they may not always understand them. The word point is often added, as " twenty-point carbon." J. B. J. CAST IRON. 93 varying in ordinary cases from under 0.5 to over 4 per cent; while 'silicon pig ' is made in the blast-furnace with from 10 to 18 per cent of silicon. No factor is of greater importance in determining the suitability of a sample of cast iron for any purpose in the foundry than its content of silicon, as this element is so constantly present, and its proportion is so. variable, while the influence it exerts on the condition of the carbon present, and conse- quently on the hardness and fluidity of the rnetal, is so marked. It was formerly very generally held that silicon was injurious in all proportions, and the less there was present in iron for foundry purposes the better. It is true that Sefstrom had observed, long ago, ' that the carbon in gray iron in which much silicon exists, say from 2 per cent to 3 per cent, is wholly, or nearly so, in the graphitic state/ * A similar observation was made by Snelus in 1870, and was still more plainly stated by Ledebur in 1879. It was also known in the United States that certain irons from Ohio which were rich in silicon could be used as ' softeners ' in foundry practice, and certain Scotch irons -were in favor for similar purposes, though the reason of this was not understood. It may, however, be claimed that no general ap- plication of these facts, or accurate knowledge of the principles underlying ' them, existed before the researches of the author, on the ' Influence of Sil- icon on the Properties of Cast Iron/ published in 1885. f For the purpose of these experiments cast iron as free as possible from silicon was specially prepared by heating wrought iron with charcoal to a high temperature in closed crucibles. This was then remelted with a silicon pig containing about 10 per cent of silicon in proportions necessary to yield any desired composition. The trials were made with sufficient material to allow of proper mechanical tests being performed, and a graduated series of mixtures was prepared. The tension, compression, and ductility tests were performed by Professor A. B. W. Kennedy with the testing-machine at University Col- lege, London, while the hardness determinations were performed by the author with a weighted diamond point (see Chapter XVIII) as described in his paper on the ' Hardness of Metals/ J The chemical analyses were checked by J. P. Walton, at that time chemist to the Glasgow Iron Com- pany, Wishaw." "The original pure cast iron was white, hard, and brittle; on adding silicon this became gray, soft, and strong; but with a large excess of silicon it once more became weak and hard. The results of the mechanical and chemical tests are shown graphically in Fig. 55, and it will be observed that the proportions of silicon corresponding to the various properties were as follows: * Percy, p. 131. f Journ. Chem. Soc., 1885, pp. 577, 902. \ Birm. Phil. Soc., Dec. 1886. 94 THE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. Maximum hardness under 0.80 per cent* " crushing strength about 0.80 " " modulus of elasticity " 1.00 " " combined crushing and tensile strength; trans- verse strength about 1.40 " " tensile strength , " 1.80 " " softness and working qualities, " 2.50 " /?/SS/0M . " 7FA/3/0M o ' , &M$l$ffffXMM0 x * ,, Wff.ffffMST. a ,, //JffffA/f? m 44000 35000 02 40 8/0 FIG. 55. Showing the Influence of Silicon on the Strength and Hardness of Cast Iron, (From Turner's Iron.) " It must be borne in mind that these values are only true for the author's experiments. Experience has since proved that these are approximately cor- rect in other cases, and that the order is as above given; but in practice the* size of the casting and the proportion of other elements will have an impor- tant influence."* The influence of silicon on the shrinkage of cast iron, in various sizes tip to 4 inches square, is well shown in Fig. 56. These results have been well * See also Arts. 76 and 79. CAST IRON. 95 established by Mr. W. J- Keep of Detroit. His results of transverse tests of strength and deflection, for varying proportions of silicon, are given iniigs.. 57 and 58. 4/40 a/00 M70 0.0S0 \\ & m .M .2$ \.30 .4$ .W & 1 2"* W// .30 /.W FIG. 56. Showing the Influence of Silicon on the Shrinkage of Cast-iron Specimens of Various Areas of Cross-section. (Keep.) " A small addition of silicon eliminates blowholes and produces sound castings. As soon as the metal is sound, with the least graphite, tJie great- est crushing strength is obtained; this condition also gives th'e maximum density, Further addition of silicon leads to the formation of graphite, di- minishes the brittleness, and gives the greatest transverse and tensile strength. When the graphite increases beyond this point, the metal is di- vided by the interspersed graphitic material, and the strength and hardness decrease. The deflection also increases with the increase of graphite, but when the maximum separation of graphite has taken place any further addi- tion of silicon causes stiffness or brittleness, and so diminishes the deflection. White iron shrinks during solidifying more than gray iron, while highly 96 THE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. siliceous iron shrinks still more than white. Hence on adding silicon to white iron the shrinkage is diminished, but an excess of silicon, on the other hand, leads to increased shrinkage. Shrinkage appears to closely follow the hardness of cast iron, hard irons almost invariably shrinking most; and as