48t3 I6ir6 v;:;- -/ i / / ' y- :>-n -a.:-^' FVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES THE INTENDANT AS A POLITICAL AGENT UNDER Louis XIV. Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, in the Faculty of Political Science, Columbia University. ALLEN JOHNSON, A. M. Associate Professor of History.^ Iowa College. Sometime Fellow in European History., Columbia University, LOWELf., MASS.: COiTKlEK-ClTI/FN COMPAVY, PlM-ilTERS, 1899. TABLE OF CONTENTS. Introduction .... 5 Chapter I. — Origin and Characteristics of the Office of Intendant . . . 7 Chapter II. — The Intendant as Financial and Judi- cial Officer ... 22 Chapter III. — The PoHce Duties of the Intendant 37 Bibliography . . . .52 453SS'^ INTRODUCTION. As one turns the leaves of the voluminous administrative cor- respondence of the old regime and reads here and there, his first impression is that of prodigious activity amid bewildering diversity and complexity. The pages are crowded with obscure allusions to peculiar local customs; dignitaries of more or less importance appear and disappear; titles and offices multiply to dis- traction. The student is tempted to believe the old regime a chaos. It is not long, however, before the figure of one adminis- trative ofificer emerges with tolerable clearness ; the intcndant seems omnipresent. And yet, when one attempts to give definife- ness to his duties, chaos threatens to reign again. There is some- thing vexingly elusive about the intendant. Viewed from one point, he is the submissive creature of the controleiir ; viewed in another light, he seems to rule as absolutely as the great monarch himself. Whether he is overwhelmed with popular applause in Pau or cursed with virulent fury in Poitou, the old regime is inseparably associated with his name. The difficulty of putting the intendant's duties into precise form arises largely from the habit of regarding him as an admin- istrative ofificer, pure and simple, when it should be borne in mind that the intendant was peculiarly hors dc hi. He was bound by no established administrative statutes or regulations; not even his connnission was registered in Parlement. To the local authori- ties he owed no obedience, since local laws and coutumcs had crystalized centuries before the intendant became a part of the administrative organism. He received frequent instructions from the king in council and from the ministers, it is true, but in gen- eral he was left singularly free to exercise his discretion. Given the ends in view, he was nearly always permitted to choose the means best suited to reach them. Such freedom might have proved inimical to the interests of the crown, if the intendant had 6 THE INTENDANT AS A POLITICAL AGENT. not been brought into immediate touch with the royal council and with the chief ministers of state by a minute and regular cor- respondence. This intimate connection made him responsive to the slightest wish of the king, — made him in fact the supple, sub- servient agent of royalty for the gratification of its every whim. When the crown felt itself menaced from any quarter and was forced to act with the full weight of its authority, a trusted officer was at hand to secure obedience to its behests. The last word upon the great historical movements of "le grand siecle" will not be said until full credit is accorded to the intendants for their unceasing labors in behalf of absolutism. Pew thoughtful readers have laid aside De Tocqueville's bril- liant review of the intendants without a desire to know more of the men who have exercised so profound an influence upon French institutions. In the following pages an attempt has been made to illustrate the nature of the intendant's office by selecting the more important phases of his activity in a period when the social and political fabric of the old regime was assuming its permanent fonn. The picture must necessarily be defective. De Tocqueville has remarked with pardonable exaggeration that under the old regime the government took the place of Providence. The student who has followed the tortuous course of the government under Louis XIV. will be inclined to acquiesce in this sentiment; assuredly the ways of that government seem often as inscrutable as those of Providence. The writer gladly takes this opportunity to acknowledge his indebtedness to Professor James Plarvey Robinson of Columbia University for many helpful suggestions, and to Mr. George H. Baker, Librarian of the Columbia College Library, for repeated favors. Thanks are due also to the authorities of the Harvard College Library for their kind attentions. Grinneli., Iowa, Dec. 26th, 1898. THE INTENDANT AS A POLITICAL AGENT UNDER LOUIS XIV. CHAPTER I. ORIGIN AND CHARACTERISTICS OF THE OFFICE OF INTENDANT. There is no more persistent error among historians than that which ascribes to Cardinal Richelieu the creation of the institution of the intendants. The source of the error is clear enough. In the collection known as anciefiues lots fraiiqaises occurs an edict of the year 1635, which the editor has dubbed ''JSdit de Creation des IntendcDits!' The name iiitejidant appears in connection with several financial offices, either newly created or reorganized, and the editor seems to have jumped at the conclusion that he had before him a document actually creating the institution so familiar to students of the old regime. The blunder was detected many years ago, but historians continue to perpetuate the illusion. It is comparatively easy to show that the word intoidaut in the edict of 1635 is to be understood in a totally different sense from that of the same word used in the phrase intendant de justice; and it is still easier to prove that intendants were in existence before the year 1635.* The former line of evidence has been restated too often to need reiteration here, but the latter may be profitably reviewed. The first intendant of whom record is preserved is Pierre *See Caillot: De I' Administration en France, I. pp. 71 et seq. This work, piibli.shed in 18.57, proved beyond a doubt that the edict of 1635 did not create the office of intendant, but simply created, or altered the nature of, certain officers known as presidents et tn'so- riers ff('n(;rnux des finances. M. Hanotaux cit es an instance where certain presidents and tn'soriers at Montpellier styled themselves intendants des gabelles. Hanotanx: Les origines des Intendants, p. 2. Kven in the time of Louis XIV. we find numerous Instances of the title used in its most general sense, where no reference to the royal intendant or commissaire departi is intended. 8 THE INTENDANT AS A POLITICAL AGENT Panisse, who was commissioned about the year 1555 to go to Corsica as intendant de justice* The island had recently fallen into the possession of the French and the king desired to establish order there by means of a royal agent. To this end Panisse — "nostre ame et f6al conseiller President en nostre court des Gene- raulx de la Justice des Aydes a Montpellier" — was given "plain pouvoir, auctoritc, commission et raandement spc^cial" to confer with the lieutenant-governor and to summon in assembly the notables and officials of the island. He was to learn from them the customs, laws and usages in the administration of justice. Over all courts he was to have "la superintendance generale," and his regulative ordinances were to be final "comme s'ilz avaient este ou estaient donnez par I'une de noz courts de Parlement." He was to go about from town to town to inform himself in regard to the local laws and customs and to exercise such police powers as he deemed necessary. The conduct of civil officers was to be noted "dillegemment, secretement et bien." He might even suspend them from office, if occasion demanded. Officers of finance were to be subjected to the same scrutiny. All abuses were to De reported to the conseil prive; although in urgent cases the intend- ant might undertake their correction upon consultation with the governor. The essential character of the institution and the lines of its future development are indicated in this commission. f The intend- ant is to represent the king in matters of justice, police, and finance in parts of the realm where war had almost subverted the social order. He is completely dependent upon the royal will in regard to both appointment and tenure of office; he is essentially the king's man. And yet, from the very nature of the circum- stances that make his office necessary, he possesses, and must possess, no little discretionary power to encounter successfully the opposition which the faithful performance of his duties will inevitably arouse. The links in the chain that binds the first intendants to those of the time of Richelieu may be easily supplied. The admirable exposition of M. Hanotauxt has done much to make the connec- *Hanotaux: Pieces just. I. p. 179. t "Elle est comme un raccourci de toute I'institution dont elle est la premifere ^bauche." Hanotaux, p. 23. i Hanotaux: Origines des Intendants. UNDER LOUIS XIV. 9 tion intelligible, and all students of the institutions of the old regime will gladly acknowledge their indebtedness to his work. During the years of civil war in France, when the royal power was reduced to a mere shadowy there are few records of intendants actually bearing the title. Royal commissioners were numerous, but their functions are not to be confounded with those of the intendants of succeeding years, however much tiie practice of commissioning such royal agents may have contributed to the final triumph of the system of permanent intendancies. The ofifice of royal commissioner was ill-defined; his authority was vague and transitory.* With the revival of the monarchy under Henry IV. the intendants spring into new prominence, and for obvious reasons. Two gigantic tasks confronted Henry of Navarre: he had first to conquer the land of which he was only grudgingly named king; and then, task scarcely less onerous, he had to pacify and rehabili- tate his kingdom. It was no easy matter to stay the hand of the rough soldier who had helped to win the allegiance of some rebellious province and who now lusted after the spoils of vic- tory; nor, on the other hand, to provide for the legitimate needs of the army of occupation, without kindling once more the hatrea of the newly regained province. Due regard for the support of the soldiers had to be joined with generous respect for the feel- ings of the people. The conditions were unusual and fully justi- fied the plan adopted by the king.t By the side of the governor of a province and the commander of the army of pacification was placed an offtcer bearing a royal mandate which conferred upon him extraordinary powers within the province where the army was to operate. In nearly every instance he bore the title of intendant, but with certain phrases added to indicate the particular duties for which he was commissioned. He might be '^intendant de justice" in an army and act as counselor to the general in matters relating to the preservation of order and discipline among the soldiers. He might be charged with the ^Hntcndance des finances' in an army and have supervision of the moneys raised for the sup- port of the troops, or he might combine all these duties and be styled ^^ Intendant de justice, de police, des vivres et des finances'' * Hanotaux, pp. 31-35. + Hanotaux, pp. 41 et seq. 10 THE IXTENDANT AS A POLITICAL AGENT in a specified army. In each and every case the sphere of his influence and power was the province where the army of pacifica- tion was located. The transformation of the intendant of an army into the intendant of a province was only natural. It might often happen that an intendant would remain for a time in the province after the immediate occasion for his coming had passed away. He would then almost imperceptibly become intendant de province* Here, then, was a tendency which, had it not been retarded by the activity of the government in other affairs, might have made the intendancy what it became in the reign of Louis XIV., a permanent office. By the year 1598, the first task of Henry had been achieved ; he could then fairly claim to be master of his king- dom and could begin with confidence the economic and financial restoration of France. Sure of the support of magistrates and people, the king could now dispense with the intendants. They had not yet acquired enough stability to exist after the immediate needs to which they owed their existence had been met. If they did not entirely disappear, they became so few as to escape notice. For the re-establishment of order in the finances, which now became the chief concern of Henry and his minister Sully, recourse w^as had once more to royal commissioners, who have erroneously been confounded with the intendants, because the term intendant was sometimes applied to them in contemporar}' documents. The error is of exactly the same sort as that in regard to the edict of 1635. Intendant is used in a general sense to designate a class of of^cers with supervisory powers, not the particular agent whom we have met as intendant de justice.^ The death of Henry I\''. left France once more a prey to the decentralizing forces which he had overcome with so much dif- ficulty. The regency grasped desperately at the only means which would presers^e its own existence: the revival of the intendants. Many of the old intendants were recommissioned; new ones were appointed until there was hardly a disaffected province where the royal power was not represented in the person of an intendant. Commissions varied between different intendants in different provinces, and between intendants who succeeded one another in the same province, but the tendency was to unite the various * Hanotaux, pp. 45-50. + M. Hanotaux puts this point beyond dispute by several citations. See page 72. UNDER LOUIS XIV. 11 appellations in the collective title intendant de justice, police et finances r* When Cardinal Richelieu came into power he found little to add to the powers and attributes of the intendants. Not only w^as the institution in existence before his day, but it had approved itself to all who sympathized with the efforts of royalty to make head against the forces of disintegration within the realm. It can- not be said that the great cardinal added anything new to the institution of the intendants ; their powers remained essentially the same; and yet Richelieu undoubtedly exercised over the intend- ants an influence w^iich may have been transitory but which was very real, so long as his master mind directed the state. The intense activity of the great minister manifested itself by a sort of reflex action in the intendants, who were fast developing into vital organs of the government. The intendancies were multi- plied, and to the tenure of office was given a greater relative per- manence; new men were appointed who exercised their powers with an energy and decision that seemed to transform the nature of their office. Conscious of the entire support of the central gov- ernment, these intendants bent all their efforts to abase the ancient local authorities. They lived in constant conflict with the gov- ernors of provinces, with the local magistrates, and with the provincial parlements and courts. It was at bottom only one phase of that deeper struggle between absolutism and the vestiges of local government. The conflict between the parlements and the intendants was long and bitter, continuing well into the reign of Louis XIV. Enough has been said, surely, to prove that Richelieu did not "create" the intendants ; all evidence goes to prove that the institu- tion was a growth. It will be a matter of surprise to those who have regarded the intendants as the peculiar product of Richelieu's genius, to find how little value he attached to the office. In his political writings there is nothing to indicate that he regarded the intendants as permanent organs of the administration, or that he rated their temporary usefulness very highly. On the contrary, if the words of the "Tcstaincjit politig7ie" are to be taken as his own, he entertained so poor an opinion of the institution that he * Hanotaux, pp. 244 et seq. 12 THE INTENDANT AS A POLITICAL AGENT actually favored reducing their powers to those of ordinary commissioners.* How firmly the intendants had entrenched themselves in the provinces, and how jealously the local authorities guarded the remains of their ancient power, the demands of the Fronde in 1648 attest. One of the first concessions that the court party had to make was the revocation of the intendants; all intendancies, except those in six provincesf, were summarily suppressed. It was a great victory for particularism over absolutism. "La cour," cried the notorious Cardinal de Retz exultantly, "La cour se sentit toucher a la prunelle de I'oeil par la suppression des intendances."! The revival of the monarchy under Louis XIV. was accom- panied by a gradual restoration of intendancies, so that by the year 1698 they numbered twenty-six, and at the outbreak of the Revolution thirty-three, besides six in the colonies. The generalities varied both in number and extent during the reign of Louis XIV. H Picardy and Artois, for example, were for a long time under the same intendant. Certain conquered provinces were governed by intendants, but not created into generalities for several years. § Generalities were designated indifferently by the name of the chief town and by the name of the province in which the greater portion of the generality lay; the generality was not necessarily coextensive with the province. It seems to have been a common practice to choose intend- ants from among the maitres des requites, who were usually rep- resentatives of the petty nobility. IT They were the people of whom St. Simon said, "Ces avocats renforces et qui du barreau, * ".le crois qu'il sera trfes utile d'envoyer souvent dans les provinces des conseillers d'Etat ou des maitres des requetes bien choisis. nou seulenient pour faire la fonction d'intendant de justice dans les villas eapitales, ce qui peut plus servir a leur vanite qu'k utilite du public; mais pour aller en tous lieux des provinces;" etc., etc. Testament politique, pp. 161-162. (Edition of 1689.) + Bourgogne, Provence, Lyonnais, Languedoc, Champagne, Picardie. % Isambert, XVII. pp. 73, 73. " Intendance is the term usually applied to the office; gineralite is used to denote the territorial division administered by the intendant. Later the term intendance was also used in this latter sense. I have taken the liberty of anglicizing these terms. § e. g. Bourgogne with Bresse, Gex. and Bugey. 1 Not a few of the attributes given to the intendants seem to have been borrowed from these maiire des requetes, whose lineal descent from the viissi dominici of Charle- magne and from the enqueteurs of Louis IX. and Philip III. has been insisted upon rather too positively by some historians. These maitres des requHes were assigned to regular circuits for the purpose of securing the enforcement of royal ordinances and of super- vising the administration of justice. The Code Michaud of 1629 [Isambert, XVI. p. 223] gives their duties in detail. Besides supervisory powers, they are to have power to reform the taxes and their assessment, to inspect registers and rolls, and to repress undp:r LOUIS XIV. 13 ou ils gagnaient leur vie il n'y a pas longtemps, sont devenus des magistrats considerables, ont pris le dc!'* It was part of the policy of Louis XIV. to choose his min- isters and officers of state from the lower nobility, who could never detract from his glory or rival his influence. The young man who aspired to become intendant smoothed the way to that respon- sible post by the purchase of a commission as viaitie des requites. It would have been contrary to the practice of the times if intrigue and favoritism had not played a prominent part in the appoint- ment of intendants. Certain intendancies were more lucrative than others; they varied greatly, too, in responsibility and dignity. The term of service in an intendancy was not fixed. There was no attempt at uniformity, for the essential feature of the office was its elasticity and its complete dependence upon the will of the king. At Rouen there were twenty-one intendants from 1664 to 1716, no one of whom held office for more than seven years, while ten of them held office for less than three. In Languedoc, between the years 1672 and 1718, there were only two intendants; of these one held office twelve, the other thirty-three years. Four intendants were installed in Picardy between 1664 and 17 18, holding office nine, ten, fourteen and ten years, respectively. Transfers from one intendancy to another were frequent, and were dictated by various motives. In 1665 Colbert seems to have made a change "gtcasy ge'n&al" of intendants, removing certain incumbents for the benefit of new appointees.t Pinon, Vicomte de Qiiincy, was successively intendant at Pau, Alenc^on, Poitiers, and Dijon. De Bouville passed from Limoges to Alen^on ; he returned then to Limoges and some years later assumed the intendancy of Orleans. Whatever may have been the immediate occasion for sucli frec|uent changes, they promoted zeal and assiduity in office and made the intendant completely subservient to the royal will. The office never became a sinecure. Cases of absolute removal seem to have been comparatively few. Larcherl was recalled from the intendancy of Chalons, apparently for neglect of duty through repeated absences, but he summarily all abuses and all attempts to evade the royal ordinances. Their ordinances were to be regarded as final, with appeal only to the council of the Kin;,'. With the rise of the intendants, th(!ir powers must have been greatly restrictod. *Monin: Hist, admin, du Languedoc pendant I'intendance de /iasrille, p. 1. i Journal d'Ollivier d'Ormesson, II. p. 431 et seii. JBoislisle: Correspondance des intvndants, II. No. 41. 14 THE INTENDANT AS A POLITICAL AGENT afterward became President of the cliambrc des comptes at Paris. When D'Arguesseau showed lack of necessary firmness for the responsible intendancy of Languedoc, he was quietly recalled to the conscil ctlt^tat, of which he was a member, and Basville was made his successor.* And even when Marillac was recalled from Poitou in disgrace he soon regained favor and was given another intendancy. The old feudal tendency for offices to become heritable crops out occasionally in the efforts of certain intendants to secure the succession in office to their sons. When a father had proved his efficiency by long years of service, his petition was sometimes granted. After twenty years of service in the intendancy of Provence, Lebret was succeeded by his son, who had been for several years associated with him. De Bouville pressed the project of creating a new generality of Chartres, in the hope that he might be transferred thither and so be near his son, who, he fondly hoped, would be given the intendancy of Alen^on. If his son were thought too young, he offered to assume both intendancies until the young man acquired the necessary experience for so responsible a post.f The project fell through, but the younger Bouville subsequently became intendant at Alengon. Such cases became more frequent in the following century, when, for example, three generations of the Chauvelin family succeeded with a single break to the intendancy of Picardy.-t The government of Louis XIV. expressed no objection to plurality of offices, so that many intendants retained their position even after they had been appointed conseillers d' J^tat. Lebret was intendant of Provence and also first president of the Parlement of Aix.§ If the intendant was spurred to assiduity in office by the fear of removal or transference, he was perhaps no less influenced by the hope of reward. His ardent ambition was a place in the conseil a Etat. "Apres vingt anneesd'absence de Paris," wrote one intendant to the controleur, "pendant laquelles j'ay tasche de ne rien omettre pour I'ex^cution des ordres de S. M., avec une fidelite et un desinteressement que j'ose dire avoir este sans reserve, souf- * Monin, pp. 2, 3. t Boislisle, II. No. 875. X Boyer de Ste. Suzanne: Les intendants de la geiicralile d' Amiens, Appendice. § Marchand, pp. 20 et .seq. UNDER LOUIS XIV. 15 frez-moy la liberte de vous demander I'honneur de vostre protec- tion, en cas de quelque vacance de place au Conseil. Encore que M. de Marillac, qui me succeda k I'intendance de Poitiers, soit aujourd'huy le premier montant des conseillers d'Estat semestres, et qu'il semble que je doive peu esperer, apr^s que tant de per- sonnes moins agees que moy et moins anciennes dans I'employ ont este placees, si j'ay le bonheur de vous voir persuade en ma faveur, je ne despereray point d'un moment heureux qui me donne la consolation qu'ont eue les sieurs des Hameaux et de Miromenil, mes deux oncles, de mourir conseiller d'Estat."* The salary of the intendant varied with the importance of the generality to which he was assigned. De Breteuil at Amiens received a yearly income of 12,000 livres,t while de Bouville at Orleans received 18,300 livres.l An allowance of 100 livres per month was also made for the intendant's secretary.§ The intend- ants were the recipients of many perquisites. Upon appointment of his successor in the intendancy of Dauphine, Boucher received as an annual pension the 6,000 livres which he had drawn regularly for fourteen years as a ^^gratificationr\ The intendants were not troubled by excessive modesty. When Le Gendre at Montauban wrote to thank the cojitroleuriov a pension accorded his sub-delegate, he unblushingly requested a similar pension to reimburse himself for numerous expenses which he recounted at some length. The colossal effrontery of the man appears in the closing passages of this precious missive: "Vous savez que je suis seul dans cette province, et que, si je ne soutenois pas le caractere dont vous m'avez revetu avec un peu de dignite, cela pourroit diminuer la consideration que vous aimez que vos cr(§atures [sic] s'attirent ; et peut-etre que le Roi n'en seroit pas si bien servi. Ouoique je sois un des plus pauvres intendants du royaume, j'aime mieux manger mon bien, n'etant pas possible que mon revenu, joint aux seuls appointements d'inten- dant, puisse sufhre aux ddpenses que je suis oblige de faire, quoique bien reglees, que de ne pas vivre avec honneur dans la place ou ♦Boislisle, I. No. 9.?6. Shortly after this same intendant asked for the position of first president of the I'arlement of Rouen. t Boyer de Ste. Suzanne, p. TiSa. t'Boislisle, II. No. 875 note. § Boyer de Ste. Siizn.nne, p. 588. Boislisle, I. No. 840. II Boislisle, I. No. 784. A similar pension was awarded to Basville. The assembly Of Bresse gave a gratillcation of 1600 livres to the intendant. Boislisle, I. No. 169 note. 16 THE INTENDANT AS A POLITICAL AGENT vous m'avez mis. Je prencls la liberte de vous presenter sur cela un placet, dans lequel j'expose mon etat au naturel; je vous sup- plie de vouloir bien en parler au Roi, quand vous le trouverez a propos. Je mets toute ma confiance en vos bont^s. La moindre pension, qui seroit pour moi un glorieux titre d'honneur, me met- troit en etat de ne point deranger mes affaires en executant vos ordres, et feroit connoitre au public que vous etes content de mes services. C'est ou je borne toute mon ambition."* The response of the controleiir was, "La conjoncture n'est pas favorable pour obtenir une pension." But it should be added in all fairness that many intendants had to rely on other sources of income besides their salary, to meet the expenses which their social duties imposed upon them.f As the absolute monarchy came to meddle more and more with the local concerns of the provinces, the duties of the intend- ants became more numerous and exacting. It was often a physi- cal impossibility for an intendant properly to inform himself of the state of the different parishes of his generality, much less to secure the enforcement of ordinances designed to reach disorders in them. He was obliged to rely on helpers, and in most cases he sought men of influence in their communities, to whom he might safely delegate his authority in exigencies that arose. This practice of sub-delegating, at first resorted to only as special occasion required, t received the tacit approval of the conseil 2ind speedily became universal. It was, of course, open to grave abuses. An intendant who was disposed to make his office a sinecure might em.ploy a small army of sub-delegates to attend to the irksome details of his office. Such cases, indeed, were not wanting. "Je ne puis pas m'empescher," wrote Colbert to an intendant in 1674, "de vous donner avis que ce qui fait le plus de peine au Roy sur tout ce qui regarde la conduite de MM. les commissaires d^partis dans les provinces, § c'est le nombre de subdelegues qu'ils establissent dans tons les lieux de leurs departements, lesquels s'attribuent, de leur chef, I'autorite de prendre connoissance de toutes sortes d'affaires, et qui abusent tr^s-souvent d'un pouvoir *Boislisle, II. No. 114.=). A similar request in Boislisle, I. No. 840. t Boislisle, 11. No. 1143. * Leiires de Colbert, IV. p. 108, No. 98. § The formula almost invarUiMy used in official documents of the old regime to designate the intendants. UNDER LOUIS XIV. 17 qu'ils ne connoissent pas, et qu'ils estendent autant que leuis fantaisies, leurs passions, et leurs interests leur suggercnt."* On the other hand, it should be said that there were intendants who displayed indefatigable zeal, employing sub-delegates only as absolute necessity required.! Instances are not wanting where intendants showed a rare amount of self-denial in the performance of burdensome duties which could not be intrusted to other hands. Many considerations entered into the choice of sub-delegates, particularly when the office became firmly established. While it was essential to have men who enjoyed consideration and respect in their communities, and men who possessed tact and aptitude for their duties, it was no less important that the sub-delegates should be staunchly loyal to the king's interests. When this latter con- dition was satisfied there was thought to be no incompatibility in holding simultaneously the office of sub-delegate and a local office. Consuls were often sub-delegates ;$ syndics, and occasion- ally mayors, retained both offices. § Lebret declared (in 1704) that all his sub-delegates were "gens dc justice y\ It was no uncommon thing for the clergy to act in this capacity. T Yet this union of royal office and local office was watched with suspicion by the people. The tiers etat of Beam protested vigorousl)' when their syndic became also a sub-delegate. They insisted that he resign one office or the other, and they seem to have carried their point. ""= A common practice was that of choosing a sub-delegate- general, who, upon commission from the king, discharged the duties of the intendant during the Litter's enforced absence.'' In Pau, precedent seems to have designated the First President of the Parlement for sub-delegate-general of that generality, but in one case, at least, the choice fell upon a counselor of the Parlement. There was probably no established precedent elsewhere. * Lettres de Colbert, IV. p. 108, No. 98. t Marfhiind. pp. .=i5. iSfi. Lebret boasted that )io had but ono sub-dolej^ate. but be ci.Tlainly employed others for special purposes. t Boislisle, II. No. lii'.io. §Boislisle, II. No. 1112. Boislisle, II. No. 2ri. II Boislisle, II. No. !S«o. % Boislisle. I. No. 17-17. Marchand, p. 5«. 'Une liste de subd(-levrues [ot Provence) serait extrCmement vt'.ric'e: on y trouveralt non seulement des ma^'istrats, mais dcs hommes dt^pde et mSme des hommes d'eglise." =- Boislisle, II. No. 1112. " Boyer de Ste. Suzanne, p. 29. t Boislisle. II. No. 701. Where illuess or other cause prevented the iiitoudanl from 18 THE INTENDANT AS A POLITICAI- AGENT The edict of 1704 which made the sub-delegate a regular officer of the administration probably brought about no radical change in the office aside from greater fixedness. The ostensible motive for this step appears in the preamble : "Le ministere de ces employes est devenu sy important et leurs fonctions sy etendues, que nous avons juge a propos d'investir ceux quy las exerceront k I'advenir, d'un caractere quy d'une part leur donne le relief et I'autorite necessaire pour le bien de leurs devoirs avec plus d'honneur et de desinteressement."* Underneath this official verbiage, however, the real motive is but ill-disguised: the edict was only one of many schemes for raising funds for the army of the king. The office became thus hereditary and permanent, by right of purchase, in each bishopric or bailiwick of the faj's d^tats, and in the chief towns where sub-delegates already existed or where necessity seemed to demand their establishment. The sub- delegates were to receive all petitions addressed to the intendant and to forward them as soon as possible, with added information and advice. They were likewise to receive the orders of the intendant, to coninnmicate them to the inaires, eschevins, conseils, or syndics of their communities, and to see to the execution of them. They were to assist in the assessment and levy of the taille and other impositions, rendering to the intendant for this purpose an exact account of their parish visitations.! These offices were to be filled with "{)ersonnes capables que nous entre ceux de nos sujets quy nous seront presentcs par les dits sieurs intendants et comm''"- departy entre les mains desquels ils presteront le serment." At a time when royalty was insisting upon the observance of court etiquette with the utmost rigor, it is no matter of surprise to find the intendants insisting punctiliously upon petty forms which they thought due to their social and political position, as bearers of royal mandate. Their anxious concern for matters of etiquette would have been ludicrous in an age less ardently devoted to formalities, but in the seventeenth century failure in the least punctilio was fatal to official influence and prestige. The exercising his functions, other means were resorted to. When Be^on at RocheDe fell ill and asUed for a three months' leave of absence, the controleur assigned Pinon of Poitou to the va''anc\'. Pinon received a '•gratiflcation" of oOOO livres for these additional ser- vices. Roislisle. II. No. 4Hfi. * Reprinted amonff Pieces justificaUves in Boyer de Ste. Suzanne, p. 5S3. + Roislisle. I. No. VSXi. gives an iuterosting instruction given by an inten lant to his sub-delegates ''iwur faire la visite des bl^s." UNDER LOUIS XIV. 19 Correspondance administrative records more than a few petty wrangles over questions of precedence in the provincial estates. The intendant in Bretigny relates a quarrel that arose between himself and the First President over their respective positions in the opening procession of the assembly. The usage had always been for tlie intendant to be accompanied by the lieutenants gen- eral, while the two commissioners of the <:-