. ELECTRONS OE THE NATUEE AND PROPERTIES OF NEGATIVE ELECTRICITY BY SIR OLIVER LODGE, F.R.S. D.Sc. LOND., HON. D.Sc. OXON. ET VICT., LI/D. ST. ANDREWS, GLASGOW, AND VICE-PRESIDENT OF THE INSTITUTION OF ELECTRICAL ENGINKERS RUMFORD MEDALLIST OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY EX-PRESIDENT OF THE PHYSICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON LATE PROFESSOR OF PHYSICS IN THE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LIVERPOOL HONORARY MEMBER OF THE AMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA, OF THE BATAVIAN SOCIETY OF ROTTERDAM, AND OF THE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF BOLOGNA PRINCIPAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM LONDON GEORGE BELL AND SONS 1906 Q-CW L7 GLASGOW : PRINTED AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS BY ROBERT MACLEHOSE AND CO. LTD. TO THE CAVENDISH PROFESSORS OF PHYSICS IN THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE, AND ESPECIALLY TO THE PRESENT HOLDER OF THE CHAIR, THIS SMALL BOOK IS DEDICATED WITH PROFOUND ADMIRATION BY THE AUTHOR 1 C>2827 PKEFACE IN 1902 I was asked by the President of the Institution of Electrical Engineers to give to that body a discourse on recent progress towards know- ledge of the nature of Electricity, especially con- cerning its discontinuous or atomic structure. This discourse, greatly extended, appeared in Vol. 32 of the Journal of the Institution, and constitutes the nucleus of the present book. Many additions have now been made, and some of the difficulties recently promulgated concerning the possibility of an electric theory of matter are touched upon. They are of date too recent to have been mentioned even in my "Komanes Lecture" before the University of Oxford, published under the title Modern Views of Matter by the Clarendon Press. The most important addition is a more detailed account of the proof of the purely electrical nature of the mass or inertia of an electron : an investi- gation generally associated on the experimental side with the name of Kaufmann, but of course based on the work of many predecessors and con- temporaries. A proof that the atom of matter is essentially composed of such electrons, and that its mass too is of purely electromagnetic nature, is lacking : the electromagnetic theory of Matter, viii PREFACE unlike the electromagnetic theory of Light, must be regarded for the present as no better than a working hypothesis. It is a hypothesis of stimulating char- acter, and of great probability, but its truth is still an open question that is probably not going to be speedily closed. I am indebted to Professor Larmor for information about some recent theoretical work, and for the substance of Appendix M ; I have also to thank Mr. Gwilym Owen, of the University of Liverpool, for assistance in the revision of the proof. As "an introduction to an allied subject, the book called Becquerel Rays, by the Hon. K. J. Strutt, is to be recommended ; and the standard treatise of Professor Eutherford on Radioactivity is well known. I have avoided dealing at length with the topics so conveniently to be found in these writings. I have also barely touched on the large subject of ' ionisation ' : it was difficult to do so without overloading the principles with detail, a knowledge of which is nevertheless necessary for investigators. The treatise of Prof. J. J. Thomson, The Discharge of Electricity through Gases, con- tains a mass of information and original work highly valued by physicists. The present book is intended throughout for students of general physics, and in places for special- ists, but most of it may be taken as an exposition of a subject of inevitable interest to all educated men. OLIVER LODGE. THE UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM, July, 1906. CONTENTS I. PROPERTIES OF AN ELECTRIC CHARGE, 1 Charge in Uniform Motion, ----- 3 Transmission of Energy, - - - - - - 6 Accelerated Charge, 7 II. ELECTRIC INERTIA, - - - - - - - 11 Electrical Inertia or Mass continued, 12 Effect of Concentration, - - - ,,-.,- - 15 Summary, 16 Historical Remarks, - - - - --17 III. FORESHADOWING OF THE ATOM OR INDIVISIBLE UNIT OF ELECTRICITY, - - ; . ~ . 19 IV. FORESHADOWING OF THE ELECTRON, - - - 24 Separate Existence of the Electric Unit suggested by Conduction in Gases, 24 Cathode Bays, --26 Nature of the Cathode Rays, 30 V. DETERMINATION OF SPEED AND ELECTROCHEMICAL EQUIVALENT OF CATHODE RAYS, - - 41 Further Measurements of Cathode Ray Velocity and m/e Ratio by Aid of Electrostatic Deflection, 47 Measuring Velocity by Combined Electric and Magnetic Deflexion Method, - - ''. , - 50 Effect on Lenard Rays, - - - - - 52 Direct Determination of the Speed of Cathode . Rays, 54 x CONTENTS CHAP. PACK VI. DETERMINATION OF ELECTROCHEMICAL EQUIVA- LENT IN THE CASE OF ELECTRIC LEAKAGE IN ULTRA-VIOLET LIGHT, - - - . 58 Positive and Negative Carriers, 66 VII. lONISATION OF GASES, 70 Behaviour of Hot Metals in Gases, - - - 71 Measurements of lonisation Current, 73 Condensation of Moisture Experiments, 75 VIII. DETERMINATION OF THE MASS OF AN ELECTRON, 77 Aitken and Cloud Nuclei, ----- 79 J. J. Thomson and Electrical Nuclei, 81 Wilson and Metrical Cloud Condensation, - - 84 Professor Stokes and Falling Spheres, 86 J. J. Thomson's Experiment of Counting, 87 Result, --.- .... 90 IX. FURTHER DETAILS CONCERNING ELECTRONS AND IONS, 91 Confirmatory Measurements of Charge, 9t Thomson's Deductions, 94 Estimate of Size, - - - - - - - 95 Penetrability of Matter by Electrons, 97 Effects of an Encounter, - - 100 X. THE ELECTRON THEORY OF CONDUCTION AND OF EADIATION, .. . - - - - - 105 Conduction, - -v - * - - - 106 Radiation, 109 XL FURTHER DISCUSSION OF THE ELECTRON THEORY OF THE MAGNETISATION OF LIGHT AND DETERMINATION OF THE m/e RATIO IN RADIATION, 116 CONTENTS xi CHAP. PAGE XII. INCREASE OF INERTIA DUE TO VERY RAPID MOTION, - .;.-*' ... - - 122 XIII. JUSTIFICATION FOR ELECTRIC THEORY OF INERTIA, 129 Proof of the Purely Electrical Nature of the Inertia of the /? Particles shot out by Radium, 131 XIV. MORE ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT OF THE COM- BINED ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC DEFLEXION METHOD FOR MEASURING VELOCITY AND MASS OF THE PARTICLES IN COMPOUND RAYS, - ... . . - 136 Experimental Device used by W. Kaufmann, - 138 XV. ELECTRIC VIEW OF MATTER, - 146 XVI. ELECTRIC VIEW OF MATTER (continued), - - 152 Nature of Cohesion, 152 On Chemical and Molecular Forces, - - - 153 Molecular Forces, Cohesion, - - - 155 XVII. FURTHER CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING THE STRUCTURE OF AN ATOM, - - - - 160 XVIII. SUMMARY OF OTHER CONSEQUENCES OF ELEC- TRON THEORY, - - . * - * - 163 Radio-activity, - . - - - - - " 163 Solar Corona, Magnetic Storms, and Aurorse, - 168 Transformations of Radium, etc., - - - 169 Emanations, * - - - ' - ' "> 171 Deflexion of Alpha-rays, - * - ; 171 Activity of Radium at all Temperatures, - 174 Spectrum of Radium, 174 Electric Production, - - - - - -176 Radio-activity of Ordinary Materials, - - 177 Population Analogy, - - ' - - - -180 xii CONTENTS CHAP. PAQE XIX. RADIATION FROM A KING OF ELECTRONS, AND ITS BEARING ON THE CONSTITUTION OF AN ATOM, - - - - 181 Instability of an Atom, 183 . Cosmic Analogy, 185 Another Account of Atomic Instability, - - 185 Electric Theory of Matter, 186 XX. DIFFICULTIES CONNECTED WITH THE ELECTRIC THEORY OF MATTER, 188 1. Concerning the Formation of Spectrum Lines, 188 2. Attempt to determine the Number of Effec- tive Corpuscles in an Atom, - - - 192 XXI. VALIDITY OF OLD VIEWS OF ELECTRICAL PHENOMENA, 195 Number of Ions in Conductors, - - - - 198 Conclusion, 200 APPENDICES A. CALCULATION OF THE INERTIA OF AN ELECTRIC CHARGE, - 204 B. THE ELECTRIC FIELD DUE TO A MOVING MAGNET, - - 207 C. ON ELECTRICITY AND GRAVITATION AND DIMENSIONS, - 209 D. DIMENSIONS OF SJM RATIO, - -.- - - -211 E. ELECTRIC SATURATION, ETC., - - - - - 212 F. SIZE OF ORBIT OF RADIATING ELECTRON, - - - - 213 G. THE RADIATING POWER OF A REVOLVING ELECTRON, - 214 H. FARADAY'S. PROPHETIC NOMENCLATURE, - - - - 217 J. ON THE /2-RAYS FROM RADIUM, 219 K. NOTE ON THE BEHAVIOUR OF A CHARGE MOVING NEARLY AT THE SPEED OF LIGHT, - - - - - 221 L. DISTORTION DUE TO HIGH-SPEED MOTION THROUGH THE ETHER, - 226 M. CONSTITUTION OF ELECTRONS, 227 UNIVERSITY INTRODUCTION IN Maxwell's Electricity published in 1873, section 57, the following sentence occurs in connection with the discharge of electricity through gases, especially through rarefied gases : " These and many other phenomena of elec- trical discharge are exceedingly important, and, when they are better understood, they will probably throw great light on the nature of electricity as well as on the nature of gases and of the medium pervading space." This prediction has been amply justified by the progress of science, and, no doubt, still further possibilities of advance lie in the same direction. The study of conduction through liquids, first, and the study of conduction through gases, next, com- bined with a study of the processes involved in radiation, have resulted in an immense addition to our knowledge of late years, and have opened a new chapter, indeed a new volume, of Physics. The net result has been to concentrate attention upon the phenomena of electric charge, and greatly xiv INTRODUCTION to enhance the importance of a study of electro- statics. Not long ago our brilliant and lamented friend, G. F. FitzGerald, used chaffingly to speak of electrostatics as " one of the most beautiful and useless adaptations of nature " ; and it was becoming the custom with teachers, who felt that they must attend exclusively to the practically useful and not waste their students' time on decoration and super- fluities, almost to ignore, or at any rate to scamper through, the domain of electrostatics, and to begin the study of electricity with the phenomena of current, especially with the connection between electricity and magnetism. And certainly from the severely practical point of view, as well as from many other aspects, this part of electrical science remains the most impor- tant ; but to him who would not only design dynamos and large-scale machinery, to him who, in addition to the training and aptitude of the engineer, possesses something of the interests, the instinct, and the insight, of a man of science, to such a one the nature and properties of an electric charge, at "rest and in motion, constitute a fascinat- ing study ; for there lies the key to the inner meaning of all the occurrences with which his active life is so intimately concerned there lies the proximate solution of problems which have excited the attention and taxed the ingenuity of philo- sophers and physicists and chemists for more than a century. Indeed it turns out that subjects INTRODUCTION xv broader and more fundamental than those known as ' electric ' are indirectly involved ; and we are now beginning to have some hope of obtaining unexpected answers to riddles such as those con- cerning the fundamental properties of matter which have proposed themselves for solution throughout the history of civilisation. Problems of this kind have aroused interest and attention ever since men began to escape from the struggle for bare exist- ence that most immediately practical of all occupa- tions and felt free to devote themselves, some to art, some to literature, some to the accumulation of superfluous wealth, and some to the gratuitous pursuit of philosophical speculation,, exact experi- ment, and pure theory. To this comparatively leisured group I now address myself. MEANING OF TERMS AND SYMBOLS AS USED IN THIS BOOK.. Electron = the unit electric charge, or atom of negative electricity. e =the amount of this charge, whether positive or nega- tive; about 3xlO~ 10 electrostatic unit. E =an electromotive force, or the strength of an electric field. H = the strength of a magnetic field. m = mass or inertia, especially the mass of an electron. a = usually, the linear dimension of an electron (about the hundred-thousandth of b). b =the linear dimension of an atom of matter (the ten- millionth of a millimetre). ion = an atom of matter with an unbalanced electric charge, either negative or positive, attached to it : the cause of chemical affinity. K = Faraday's dielectric constant, or the specific inductive capacity of free ether. P = the magnetic permeability of free ether. [These two are the great ethereal constants, whose value and nature are not yet known. Only their product is known.] v =the velocity of light in vacuo = 3 x 10 10 cm. per sec. u = the velocity of a particle. CHAPTER I. PROPERTIES OF AN ELECTRIC CHARGE. FIRST I must lay a basis of pure theory : we must consider the properties of the ancient and long known phenomenon called an electrified body. Two substances placed in intimate contact and separated are in general united more or less per- manently by lines of force, the region between them being in a state of tension along the lines and of pressure at right angles. These lines have direction and ' sense ' their two ends are not alike : they begin at one body and end at another, they map out a field of electrostatic force, and their terminations on one or other of the bodies constitute what we call an electric charge. Electric charges are of two kinds, positive and negative, the former corresponding to the beginning of the lines, the latter to their ends. To one class of bodies, called insulators, the lines appear rigidly attached : the charges cannot be dis- placed nor transferred elsewhere without violence ; whereas in another class they slip easily along, and are transferred from one such conducting body to another in contact with it, with great ease. A tension in the lines tends to bring the ends together as near as possible, while laterally the lines tend to drive each other apart : this image sufficing to L.E. 2 PROPERTIES OF AN ELECTRIC CHARGE [CH. I. represent all that is observed as electrical attractions and repulsions. The field of force mapped by the lines can exist in vacuo perfectly well, but the lines never terminate in vacuo ; the charges are always carried by matter, or by something equivalent thereto. In empty space it is probable that the only way of destroying such a field of force is to allow the two bodies possessing the charges to approach each other, and thus shorten up the lines to nothing ; though, even so, it is not prob- able that the charges are destroyed, but only placed so close together that they have no external effect at any moderate distance. When matter is present, however, it may be able to assist this collapse of the lines in various ways, giving rise to the various phenomena of conduction and of disruptive discharge. If one of the two oppositely charged bodies is sent away to a considerable distance, while the other is isolated and regarded alone, the lines of this latter start out in all directions in nearly straight lines, giving rise to the simple notion of a single charged body. There must however be a complementary charge, the other ends of the lines must be some- where ; though they may be so far away as to be spoken of as, for all practical purposes, at infinity. Parenthetical remark of general application. People often feel hesitation about the treatment of things as at infinity, as if it introduced a conception of some difficulty ; but they should realise that this mode of expression is always employed as a simplifi- cation, whenever it happens that for present purposes the said things can be ignored. If their existence requires attention, it must be recognised that they are really at some finite distance, and their location must be specified ; but such specification complicates CH. L] CHARGE IN MOTION 3 both ideas and equations. Whenever attention to them is unnecessary, or their location immaterial, this specification is avoided by treating them practically as if they were at infinity, that is by ignoring them. Every now and then this policy of ignoration must be suspended, but for a multiplicity of purposes it serves. Charge in uniform motion. Now consider how far this field of force belongs to the body, and how far it belongs to space, that is to the ether surrounding the body. The body is the nucleus whence the lines radiate, but the lines them- selves, the state of tension and other properties which they represent and map out, do not belong to the body at all ; at each point of space there is a peculiar etherial condition called an electric potential, and this potential represents something "occurring in the ether and in the ether alone, though it is originated and maintained by the body. Picture in the mind's eye such a charged body, say a charged sphere, and let it change its position ; how are we to regard the effect of the displacement on its field of force ? Few things in physics are more certain than this, that when a body moves along, the ether in its neighbourhood is not dragged with it, as if it were in the slightest degree viscous.* The ether, in fact, as a whole i.e. when unmodified or in its normal condition is stationary : it is susceptible to strain, but not to motion ; it is the receptacle of potential, not of locomotive kinetic energy. The only generated motion to which it is possibly susceptible is of what is called ' irrotational ' character in other words it behaves as a perfect fluid. It may possess * Lodge, Phil. Trans. 1893, p. 727, and especially 1897, p. 149. 4 PROPERTIES OF AN ELECTRIC CHARGE [CH. I. other rotational, or vortex-like motion, but, if so, it is indestructible and unproducible by any known means, and has not yet been discovered. The effect of the motion of the body, then, is to relieve the strain of the ether at one place and to generate it at another ; the state of strain travels with the body, but through the ether. Regarding the matter from the point of view of the ether, we might say that the field of force is constantly being destroyed and regenerated as the body moves. Regarding it from the point of view of the moving body, we should say that it carries its field with it. The question now arises and it is far from being an easy question what sort of occurrences go on in the ether when this decay and regeneration of an electrostatic field is occurring, or when a field of force is moving through it ? Can it adapt itself instantly to the new conditions, or does it require time ? This matter has been studied, closely and exhaustively, by Mr. Oliver Heaviside. Fix the eye upon a point a mile distant from the body ; does the information about the motion of the body reach that point instantaneously, so that all the lines of force move like absolutely rigid spokes, every part simultaneously ? If so, how is the communi- cation carried on, so that the distant parts of the medium can be thus instantaneously affected ? Or does the disturbance only arrive at the distant point after the lapse of a small but appreciable time ; in other words, has there to be an adjustment to the new conditions an adjustment which reaches the nearest parts first and the further parts later ; and if so, what additional phenomena can be observed during the unsettled period ? CH.L] CHARGE IN MOTION 5 The answer is that during the motion of the charged body, and even after the cessation of its motion, until the disturbance has had time to die away and everything to settle down into static con- dition again, the phenomena of magnetism make their appearance : a new set of lines of force quite different from the electrostatic lines (although they, too, exhibit a tension along them and a pressure at right angles) come into temporary being. These do not like the electric ones originate at one place and terminate at another : they are always and necessarily closed curves or rings, and in the present simple case they are circles all centred upon the path of motion of the charged body. At any point of space there are now three directions to consider : (l) there is the original direction of the electrostatic field the original electric line of force ; (2) there is the direction of the motion that is, a direction parallel to the movement of the charged sphere ; and (3) there is the direction at right angles to these two ; this last being the direction of the magnetic lines of force the direction of the magnetic field. I spoke of the magnetic field as temporary, but that is on the assumption that the charged body is merely displaced merely shifted from one position to another ; if it is not stopped, but keeps on moving, then the magnetic lines continue as long as the motion lasts. The strength of the magnetic field, at any point with polar coordinates r, 0, is TT eu a H = r sin 6. r 2 If we are asked whether such a magnetic field is weak or not, I have to reply that that depends entirely on how strong the charge is and how quickly 6 PROPERTIES OF AN ELECTRIC CHARGE [CH. I. it is moving. There is, in my opinion, no other kind of magnetic field possible ; and so if ever we come across a magnetic field which we feel entitled to consider " strong," we must conclude that it is associated with the motion of a very considerable charge, at a velocity we may properly style great. But certainly it is true that for any ordinary charged sphere, moving at any ordinary pace, even supposing that it is a cannon-ball shot from the mouth of a gun the concentric circular magnetic field sur- rounding its trajectory is decidedly feeble. Feeble or not, it is there, and to its existence we must trace all the magnetic phenomena of the electric current. For just as there is no electrostatic field save that extending from one charged body to another, so there is no electric current except the motion of such a charged body, and no magnetic field except that which surrounds the path of this motion. The locomotion of an electric charge is an electric current, and the magnetic field surrounding that current is believed to be the only kind of magnetic field in existence. If any other variety is possible, the burden of proof rests on those who make the positive assertion. Transmission of Energy. While the charge is stationary everything is steady, and we have an electric field only. While the charge is moving at constant speed the current is steady, and we have a steady magnetic field superposed upon a steadily moving electric field; there is likewise a certain conveyance of energy in the direction of the motion. This is a special case of the general theorem known as Poynting's : viz. that wherever an electric CH. i.] ACCELERATED CHARGE 7 and a magnetic field are superposed there cannot be static equilibrium at that place, energy must flow through the medium ; and the rate of transfer of energy the amount conveyed per second through unit area is equal to 1/4 TT times the vector product of the intensity of the two fields : that is to say, it is measured by the area of the parallelogram bounded by lines representing the two fields in magnitude and direction ; a quantity commonly expressed as V(EH), or [EH], or as EH sin 0, where is the angle between E and H. The direction of propagation of energy is normal to that same area, and its ' sense ' or sign depends upon the sense of the two fields. If both were reversed, the sense of the transmission of energy would continue unchanged : and its amount remains constant so long as the fields are constant, that is so long as the current is steady. Another way of expressing the facts is to say that the space in which two fields are superposed is full of momentum ; and that the moment of momentum ^appropriate to a pole m and a charge e is simply em. Accelerated Charge. One more statement : So far we have dealt with the case of steady rest or steady motion ; but what about the intermediate stages, the stages of starting and stopping ? What is the condition of things after the charge has begun to move but before it has attained a constant speed, and again when the brake is applied and the speed is decreasing, or when the direction of motion is chang- ing? What phenomena are observable during the epoch of acceleration or retardation of speed or 8 PROPERTIES OF AN ELECTRIC CHARGE [CH.L- curvature of path ? Something more* than simple electrostatics and simple magnetism is then observed. For whenever a conductor is moved across a magnetic field it is well known that an electromotive force acts in that conductor, of magnitude equal to the rate at which magnetic lines of force are being cut ; or in symbols . E= dN/dt, which is the fundamental ' dynamo ' equation. This is called the phenomenon of magneto-electric in- duction ; it is the induced E.M.F. discovered by Faraday, and it necessarily occurs whenever magne- tism and relative motion are superposed. It is quite independent of the conductivity of the conductor however, and would have the same value if the motion took place in an insulator, though of course it could not then produce the same effect as regards conduction-currents. The effect of a conductor is to integrate, or add up, the E.M.F.'S generated in each element all along its length, and thus to display the effect in an obvious manner : especially when the conductor is made very long and is compactly coiled (as in an armature). The definition of electromotive force between two points A and B, or round any closed contour, is the line-integral of electric field from A to B, or round the same contour. In the unclosed- path case it is measured by the difference of electric potential between A and B. One of the easiest and most ordinary ways of superposing motion and magnetism, is to allow or cause a magnetic field to vary in strength (as in a Ruhmkorff coil) ; for then the lines of force move broadside on, expanding or contracting as the case may be, and thus at once we get the phenomenon CH. i.] ACCELERATED CHARGE 9 of induction the generation of an induced E.M.F., of value at any point equal to the rate of change of the lines of magnetic force there. This is what happens whenever an electric charge is accelerated ; for then its magnetic field which, as we have seen, depends upon the velocity necessarily changes in strength, and so an E.M.F. is induced. There being no conductor, this E.M.F. will propel no current, but it will represent an electric force which was not there before, and the new force will be in a new direc- tion ; the direction of an induced electric force is perpendicular to the direction in which the grow- ing magnetic lines are moving, which in the present case is outwards from the charge. Con- sequently the new or induced E.M.F. points in the direction of motion, though in the sense opposed to any change in it ; and the effect of the super- position of this new E.M.F. upon the already existing magnetic field is to cause a certain small transmission . of energy in a radial direction out and away from the accelerated charge. Some energy therefore flashes away with the speed of light ; and although in ordinary cases it may be an exceedingly small amount which is thus radiated into space, yet it is the only mode of generating radiation with which we are acquainted. It is from an electric charge during its epochs of acceleration or retardation that we get the pheno- menon called radiation ; it is this and this alone which excites ethereal waves, and gives us the different varieties of light. The energy radiated per second has been shown by Larmor to be 10 PROPERTIES OF AN ELECTRIC CHARGE [CH. i. where v is the speed of light and u is the acceleration of the charge e. After this manner, though of course by means of a very extensive development of these fundamental ideas, are all the phenomena of electricity and mag- netism and optics summarised, and, so to speak, accounted for. NOTE. Let it be said here, once for all, that in every case one or other of the two etherial constants, p and K, should be exhibited explicitly wherever it rightly occurs. If this be not done the dimensions of most expressions are necessarily wrong; and words have to be added about whether the units intended are c.g.s. or some other system, and likewise whether they are electrostatic or electromagnetic. This latter double system of measurement has served its turn, and still serves it ; but intrinsi- cally it is confusing, and has been only rendered necessary because we do not yet know the values, or even for certain the t nature, of p and K. It is to be hoped that no third system 'devised as an attempted escape from confusion, but really an intensification of fog will ever be successfully attempted ; though there are threats in that direction, owing to lack of clear thinking. The explicit retention of the constants keeps everything clear and easy. For instance, the expression just above quoted is essentially what it purports to be, an energy divided by a time FL and is therefore true as it stands in every complete system of units whatever. So also the expression quoted near the be- ginning of the next chapter is essentially what it purports to be, namely, a mass or inertia ; and the same may be said of all other expressions in this book. The ordinary convention for numerical specification is, for electromagnetic c.g.s. units, to consider /* = 1, for electrostatic units, to consider K = I \ and this convention must hold until we learn the real facts, by future discovery : for which discovery continual familiarity with the unknown constants undoubtedly serves to pave the way. CHAPTER II. ELECTEIC INERTIA. WHATEVER a charge may be, and whatever the physical constitution of the ether, it must be able to maintain electric lines and magnetic lines separately, and to transmit energy wherever both sets of lines coexist and cross each other. An accelerated charge is equivalent to a changing current, for dC/dt may be written d 2 e/dt 2 . When- ever a current changes it is well known that an E.M.F. of self-induction is set up, equal to LdC/dt; and this electrical equation E = L e corresponds to the mechanical equation F = ra x, Newton's second law. Considered from the point of view of a current as constituted by a moving charge, this self-induced or reaction E.M.F. corresponds or is analogous to a mass- acceleration. And the electrical acceleration is opposed by the E.M.F., just as the acceleration of matter is opposed by its mechanical inertia. The coefficient of the electric acceleration commonly denoted by L represents therefore an inertia term, and is properly called 'electric inertia.' By Lenz's law the effect of induction is always to oppose the cause which is producing it. In the present case the * cause' is the acceleration or retarda- tion of the moving charge ; and so, in each case, this 12 ELECTRIC INERTIA [CH. n. is opposed by the reaction of the magnetic lines generated by it. Motion is opposed while it is increasing in speed, and it is assisted while it is decreasing in speed an effect precisely analogous to ordinary mechanical inertia ; and therefore force is necessary, and work must be done, either to start or to stop the motion of a charged body. An extra force, that is, by reason of its charge. Whatever ordinary inertia the body may have, considered as a piece of matter, it has a trifle more by reason of its being charged with electricity no matter what the sign of its charge may be. The value of this imitation or electrical inertia, for the case of a charged sphere of radius a, was calculated by J. J. Thomson in 1881, and is 3a Electrical Inertia or Mass, continued. Since this is very important, I repeat : Just as a changing magnetic field affects an electro- static charge, that is to say generates a feeble field of electric force, into the intensity of which the velocity of light enters squared in the denominator (see Lodge, Phil. Mag., June 1889, p. 472), so it is with a changing electric field, it generates a magnetic field proportional to its velocity of change. And if it is being accelerated, the magnetic field itself varies, and in that case generates an E.M.F. which reacts upon the accelerated moving charge, always in such a way as to oppose its motion by what is called Lenz's law, or simply by the law of conservation of energy : for if it assisted the CH. II.] ELECTRIC INERTIA 13 motion, the action and reaction would go on in- tensifying themselves, until any amount of violence was reached. The magnetic lines generated by a rising current, that is by a positively accelerated charged body, react back upon the motion which produced them in such a way as to oppose it ; to oppose it actively or elastically, not passively or sluggishly as by friction. The reaction ceases the instant the motion becomes steady : it is not analogous to friction therefore, but to inertia ; it is the coeffi- cient of an acceleration term. The magnetic lines generated by a falling current, that is by a negatively accelerated or retarded charged body, react oppositely, and tend to con- tinue the motion : thus here also we have a term corresponding to inertia. And the charged body may be said to have extra momentum, by reason of its charge, while it is moving. The value of the momentum is proportional to the velocity, so long as the velocity is not excessively great ; and accordingly the inertia term is constant, i.e. inde- pendent of speed, under the same restriction. It may therefore be considered to be in existence even when the charge is stationary, and thus it simulates exactly the familiar mechanical inertia of a lump of ordinary matter. In Appendix A, is given the simplest form of the quantitative relations here indicated, and the inertia due to an electric charge is there calculated. It is to be understood that whatever inertia a material sphere may possess, considered as matter, it will possess more when it is charged with elec- tricity, and this no matter whether the charge be positive or negative. The amount of extra or 14 ELECTRIC INERTIA [CH. n. electrical inertia is proportional to the electrostatic energy of the charge : that is to say, it is pro- portional to the charge and its potential conjointly. Call the charge e, and the radius of the sphere a, the potential will be e/Ka (K being Faraday's dialectric constant) ; and the appropriate inertia is where v is the velocity of light. (See Note at end of chap, i.) Another way of putting it is to say that if a real mass of this amount were moving with the speed of light, its kinetic energy would be half as great again as the potential energy of the electric charge thus reckoned as mechanically equivalent to it; for ~mv 2 = -e . = charge x potential 4 2 KCI 2 = potential energy. Now any appreciable quantity of matter, even a milligramme, moving with the speed of light, must have a prodigious amount of energy ; for, on the ordinary assumption that mass is quite constant, the energy of one milligramme rushing along with the light-speed would amount to no less than fifteen million foot-tons. Or as Sir William Crookes has expressed it : a gramme, or fifteen grains, of matter, moving with the speed of light, would have energy enough to lift the British Navy to the top of Ben Nevis. Consequently the inertia of any ordinary quantity of electric charge must be exceedingly minute. Notwithstanding this, it is quite doubtful whether CH. ii.] ELECTRIC INERTIA 15 or not there really exists any other kind of inertia. The question whether there does or not is at present, strictly speaking, an open one. Effect of Concentration. The only way of conferring upon a given electric charge any appreciable mass, is to make its potential exceedingly high, that is to concentrate it on a very small sphere. A coulomb at the potential of a volt has an elec- trostatic energy of half a Joule, that is ^ x 10 r ergs. The mass equivalent to this would be 2 10^ 2 39xl0 20 = 27 X 10 ~ 13 g ramme= 10 ~ 8 milligramme. Kaise the potential to a million volts, and the mass-equivalent to a coulomb at that potential would be the hundredth part of a milligramme ; still barely appreciable therefore. The charge on an atom as observed in electrolysis is known to be 10~ 10 electrostatic units.* If this were distributed uniformly on a sphere the nominal size of an atom, viz., one 10~ 8 centimetre in radius, its potential would be one hundredth of an elec- trostatic unit, or . about 3 volts. The energy of such a charge would be 10~ 12 erg, and the inertia of a body which would possess this energy if moving at the speed of light would be 10~ 33 gramme ; which would therefore be its electrical inertia or extra mass. But this is incomparably smaller than the mass of a hydrogen atom, which is approximately 10~ 25 gramme. Consequently the ionic charge distributed uniformly over an atom would add no appreciable fraction to its apparent mass. * More exactly, according to Cambridge measurements, 3*3 x 10 ~ 10 . 16 ELECTRIC INERTIA [CH, n. If, however, the atomic charge were concentrated into a sphere of dimension 10~ 13 centimetre, its potential would be 1000 electrostatic units, or 300,000 volts; its energy would then be 10~ 7 erg, and its inertia 10 ~ 28 gramme, or about YTHJIT f the mass of a hydrogen atom. Summary. All this is a preliminary statement of undeniable fact : that is to say of fact which follows from the received and established theory of Electricity, whether such things as electrons have ever been found to exist or not. All that we have stated is true of an ordinary charge on any ordinary sphere which can be made to move by mechanical force applied to it. It gives us the phenomena of electrostatics when at rest, of magnetism when in motion, of radiation when its motion is altered ; and it incidentally, by reason of the known laws of electromagnetic induction, exhibits a kind of imitation inertia, and in that way simulates the possession of the most fundamental property of matter. > I will add a few more closely connected assertions, for later application : Apply a sufficiently violent E.M.F. to a charged sphere, and the charge may be wrenched off it. Insert an obstacle in the path of a violently moving charged sphere, so as to stop it mechanically with sufficient suddenness, and again it is possible for the charge, or something like it, to be jerked off it and passed on. But to do this the speed of the material sphere, as well as the suddenness of stoppage, must be CH.II.] HISTORICAL REMARKS 17 excessive. Usually the charge is merely thrown into oscillation, when the sphere is suddenly stopped ; and it then emits a solitary wave or spherical shell of thick- ness equal to the diameter of the sphere : or greater than that diameter by the amount the sphere has moved during its retardation. When the acceleration is moderate, however, the radiation is less energetic and also less intense : less energetic because its power depends on the square of the acceleration, less intense because it is spread over a thicker ethereal shell. Rontgen rays are perceptible only when the speed was^ great and the stoppage so sudden that the wave or pulse- shell is strong and thin (see chap. viii.). The thinner the pulses or wave shells the more penetrating they are. If thin enough they could traverse matter without affecting it or being affected by it. Historical Remarks. The doctrine of the behaviour of a charged sphere in motion, and the calculation of the value of the quasi inertia of an electric charge, was begun by Professor J. J. Thomson in an epoch-making paper published in the Philosophical Magazine for April, 1881 one of the most remarkable physical memoirs of our time. The stimulus to this investigation was supplied by those brilliant experiments of Crookes, published in the Philosophical Transactions for 1879, which were preceded by observations of Pliicker and Hittorf, and related to other observations by Goldstein, Spottis- wood and Moulton, and others, about the same period. In 1891 Sir William Crookes was President of the Institution of Electrical Engineers, and in his inaugural address he expounded further some of these brilliant experimental investigations, to which Schuster L.E. 18 ELECTRIC INERTIA [CH. n. and many others had contributed. It is not too much to say that up to the time of Crookes the phenomena of the vacuum tube were shrouded in darkness, not- withstanding much laborious and painstaking work done both in this country and on the Continent in connection with them ; but that since the researches of Crookes in the seventies, the theoretical luminosity of the vacuum tube has steadily increased, until now, as Maxwell predicted, it is shedding light upon the whole domain of electrical science, and even upon the constitution of matter itself. CHAPTEK III. FORESHADOWING OF THE ATOM OR INDIVISIBLE UNIT OF ELECTRICITY. So far we have dealt with the fundamental laws of electricity in' general. It is now time to begin to consider the possibly atomic or molecular condition in which it is associated with atoms of matter. Quoting again from the great Treatise of Clerk Maxwell, 1st Edition (1873), we find on page 312, in the chapter on electrolysis, the following sentence : " Suppose, however, that we leap over this difficulty by simply asserting the fact of the constant value of the molecular charge, and that we call this constant molecular charge, for convenience in description, one molecule of electricity." . . . Thus some idea of the conception of the atomic nature of electricity was long ago forced upon men of genius by the facts of electrolysis and a knowledge of Faraday's laws. But Maxwell went on, after a few more paragraphs : "It is extremely improbable that when we come to understand the true nature of electrolysis we shall retain in any form the theory of molecular 20 FORESHADOWING OF THE ATOM [CH. in. charges, for then we shall have obtained a secure basis on which to form a true theory of electric currents, and so become independent of these provisional theories." It is rash to predict what may ultimately happen, but the present state of electrical science seems hostile to this latter prediction of Maxwell. The theory of molecular charges looms bigger to-day, and has taken on a definiteness, largely as the outcome of his own work, that would have pleased and surprised him. The unit electric charge, the charge of a monad atom in electrolysis, whatever else it is, is a natural unit of electricity, of which we can have multiples, but of which, so far as we know at present, it is impossible to have fractions. I will extract the following sentence from Section 32 of my little book called Modern Views of Electricity (1889. See also Brit. Assoc., Aberdeen, 1885, p. 763): " This quantity, the charge of one monad atom, constitutes the smallest known portion of electricity, and is a real natural unit. Obviously this is a most vital fact. This unit, below which nothing is known, has even been styled an ' atom of electricity,' and perhaps the phrase may have some meaning. . . . This natural unit of electricity is exceedingly small, being about the hundred-thousand-millionth part of the ordinary electrostatic unit,: or less than the hundred- trillionth of a coulomb." The atom with its charge is called an " ion." The charge considered alone, without attending to its CH.IIL] OF ELECTRICITY 21 atom, was called by Dr. Johnstons Stoney an " electron " or natural electrical unit. What we learn with great accuracy from electro- lysis is the ratio of the charge to the mass of substance with which it is associated. It matters nothing how much substance is chosen, whether 100 atoms or one, whether an atom or a gramme or a ton, the amount of electricity associated with it in electrolysis, and liberated when the substance is decomposed, increases in the same proportion ; the ratio is constant for each material, and if determined for one is known for all. This ratio is the reciprocal of what is technically known as the " electrochemical equivalent " of a sub- stance. In the light of Faraday's laws, if this quantity is measured for one substance it is known for all, because the charge is the same for every kind of atom, up to a simple multiple ; and hence in specify- ing electrochemical equivalents there is nothing to consider but the atomic weight, or combining proportion, of the substance. Thus the electro- chemical equivalent of oxygen is 8 times that of hydrogen, that of zinc is 32|- times, and that of silver 108 times that of hydrogen. The substance chosen for a determination of the electrochemical equivalent may be the one which can be most accurately experi- mented on ; and Lord Rayleigh has shown that such a substance is nitrate of silver, and has ascertained that if a current of one ampere is passed from a silver anode to a platinum cathode through a nitrate of silver solu- tion, the cathode gains in weight by 4*025 grammes every hour. Hence the electrochemical equivalent of silver is 4*025 grammes f 1 ampere-hour ' 22 FORESHADOWING OF THE ATOM [CH. HL the electrochemical equivalent of hydrogen, being Y^-gth of this quantity, is 4*025 grammes 4*025 108 ampere-hours = 108 x 360 C ' g ' S * = '0001035 c.g.s. = Q gg nn grammes per coulomb. Hence the ratio of an atom of electricity to an atom of hydrogen is 9,660 M~^ c.g.s. units, or approximately centimetres\ { // V * grammes/ the unknown constant M necessarily making its appearance, because we are comparing quantities of different nature, or at any rate quantities measured in different ways, viz., 'electricity' and 'matter' (see Appendix D). The numerical part of this quantity is known with comparative exactitude,* that is to say up to the limits of error of experiment : to proceed further, we must make an estimate of the mass of an atom. That can be done, and has been done, in many ways, and we have been taught both by Dr. Johnston e Stoney and by Loschmidt, originally even by Dr. Thos. Young, but with greatest force and range by Lord Kelvin, that the mass of an atom of water is approximately 10~ 24 of a gramme; wherefore an atom of hydrogen will be approximately 10 ~ 25 gramme; whence the unit of electric charge is 10~ 21 c.g.s. magnetic unit, or 10~ 10 of an electrostatic unit or 10- 20 of a coulomb. *The decimal places are correctly printed above ; though the fact that 1 coulomb, or 1 ampere-second, is one-tenth of a c.g.s. unit owing to the ohm and volt having been inadvertently defined, one as 10 9 , and the other as 10 8 c.g.s., instead of both the same always stands ready to introduce confusion and error. CH. in.] OF ELECTRICITY 23 I have emphasised this matter of the ratio m to e, or e to ra, because it plays a considerable part in what follows. The absolute values are of less consequence to us than the ratio, and are only known approximately, but the ratio is known with fair accuracy ; and the ratio e : m for hydrogen is very nearly 10 4 magnetic units, or more exactly 9,660. Thus what we learn from electrolytic conduction, briefly summarised, is that every atom carries a certain definite charge or electric unit, monads carrying one, diads two, triads three, but never a fraction ; that in liquids these charges are definitely associated with the atoms, and can only be torn away from them at the electrodes ; that the current consists of a procession of such charges travelling with the atoms, the atoms carrying the charges, or the charges dragging the atoms, according to the point of view from which we please to regard the process. CHAPTEE IV. FORESHADOWING OF THE ELECTRON. Separate Existence of the Electric Unit suggested by Conduction in Gases. WE will now leave liquids and proceed to conduction by ratified gases, that is to say to the phenomena seen in vacuum tubes. If a long glass tube, say a yard long and two inches wide, with an electrode at each end, and full of common air, is connected to an induction coil and attached to an air-pump, the ordinary spark-gap of the coil being, say, two or three inches wide, we find that for some time after working the pump the electric discharge prefers the inch or two of ordinary air to a long journey through the partially rarified air in the tube ; but that at a certain stage of exhaustion, one which any rough air-pump ought to reach, this preference ceases. A flickering light appears in the tube, readily visible in the dark, which very soon takes on the appearance of red streamers like the Aurora Borealis ; and soon the sparks outside in the common air cease, showing that the rarified air is now the better conductor and the preferable alternative path. Let the exhaustion proceed further the axis of the tube becomes illumined with a glow, which is now much brighter, CH.IV.] VACUUM TUBE 25 forming a band or thread of light, while the original spark-gap may be shortened down gradually to one- eighth of an inch, or even less, without any spark taking place across it, showing that rarified air is a very good conductor. When the best conducting stage is reached the tube is filled with a glow, called the positive column ; and both ends of the tube are apt to look alike. If we exhaust still further and to exhaust even as far as this something better than an ordinary air-pump is necessary, an oil or mercury pump being the most suitable the column of light is seen to fill the whole tube, to gradually lose its bright red or crimson tint, and to break up into a number of very narrow discs, like pennies seen edge- ways. At the same time the spark-gap must be widened to something more like a quarter or half an inch, to prevent the discharge from taking that path, and a dark space near the cathode now begins to be visible, the cathode itself being covered all over with a glow, while the anode is usually only illuminated at a point or two. The striae, into which the positive column has been broken up, thicken and separate as exhaustion proceeds. The dark space near the cathode also enlarges, driving as it were the positive column before it into the anode, and looking as if it would presently fill the tube ; but before it can do this it is noticed that the glow on the cathode itself is coming off as a kind of shell, leaving another dark space, a narrower and much darker space, inside it. The first dark space has been called Faraday's dark space ; the second is generally known by the name of Crookes'. This second dark space now increases in thickness, pushing the glow before it as the vacuum gets better and better ; but the terminals of the spark-gap must now be pulled still further apart, else 26 FORESHADOWING OF THE ELECTRON [CH. IV. the discharge will prefer to take a reasonably long path through the air. Exhausting further still, the glow all disappears and the second dark space fills the whole of the tube ; and now is noticed a new phenomenon, the sides of the glass have begun to glow with a phosphorescent light, the colour of the light depending on the kind of glass used, but generally in practice with a greenish light ; a result evidently of being the boundary of the dark space. If exhaustion proceeds further, the resistance of the tube becomes very high, and the spark may prefer to burst through an equal, and ultimately even a greater, length of ordinary air. This is the condition of the tube so much investigated by Crookes, by Lenard and Rontgen, and by many other observers. It is the phenomena occurring in this dark space which have proved of the most intense interest. Cathode Rays. So far we have supposed that the cathode is a brass knob or other convenient terminal introduced into the tube ; but if we now proceed to use other shapes, as Plucker did first in 1859, followed by Hittorf (1869), Goldstein (1876),and Crookes (1879) using a flat disc or a saucer-shaped piece of metal, and if we then introduce into the dark space various sub- stances, we shall find that shadows are thrown, and that the dark space is full of properties which are most clearly expressed by saying that it is a region of cathode rays that is to say, of something shot off in straight lines from the cathode. There is evidently something being thus shot off though what- ever it is, it is invisible until it strikes an obstacle something which seems to fly in straight lines and to produce a perceptible effect only when it stopped. CH. iv.] CATHODE RAYS 27 Such a * something' might be a bullet from a gun, which is quite invisible when looked at sideways, but may produce a flash of flame when it strikes a target, or may do other damage. So it is with these cathode rays : the region of their flight is the dark space ; the boundaries of that space, where the projectiles strike, are illuminated. A substance with phosphorescent power, such as many minerals, or even glass, phos- phoresces brightly ; and the path of the rays can be traced by smearing a sheet of mica with some phosphorescent powder and placing it edgeways along their path. In this way it can be shown that the rays are like particles travelling definitely in straight lines, not colliding against each other, but each shot like bullets from an immense number of parallel guns. Where they strike the sides of the glass they make it phosphoresce; where they strike residual air in the tube, as they do if the exhaustion is not high enough, they make it phos- phoresce also, and give, in fact, the ordinary glow surrounding the dark space. These rays possess a considerable amount of energy, as can be shown by concentrating them, by means of a curved saucer-shaped cathode, and bringing them to a focus. The rays can be brought to a focus in consequence qf the fact that they are projected from the cathode initially normal to its surface, though the focus is further from the cathode than the centre of curvature because of something equivalent to mutual repulsion of the rays. A piece of platinum put at that focus will (if the exhaustion is not too high) show evident signs of being red-hot that is to say, will emit light. If the exhaustion proceeds further, less heat is produced, though a phosphorescent light is 28 FORESHADOWING OF THE ELECTRON [CH. iv. now emitted from suitable substances, like alumina and most earths ; and if the exhaustion is pressed further still, the bombarded target emits no visible light but only that higher kind of radiation known as Rontgen or X-rays. It may be doubted, however, whether the target itself emits these rays, whether its function is not rather to stop the projectiles, as suddenly as possible, by the massiveness of its atoms. Thus the best target would be a substance with the heaviest atoms. X-rays are emitted by the suddenly stopped projectiles, in a manner which has been investigated both by Sir G. Stokes and Professor J. J. Thomson, and which is intelligible to anyone who has studied the properties of moving electric charges moving at or near the speed of light : a matter on which Mr. Heaviside has written with great clearness in his volume called Electromagnetic Theory. Cathode rays have a remarkable penetrating power; for Hertz found that a thin metal diaphragm, especially if it were of aluminium, was powerless to stop their passage completely ; as could be demon- strated by the phosphorescence and other effects appearing in the further half of the tube beyond the diaphragm. The position of the anode in such experiments is of small consequence. There must be one somewhere, and the easiest plan is to make it a cylinder through which the cathode ray bombardment goes. The bombarding particles fly in straight lines and decline to turn a corner, taking no apparent notice of the position of the anode, and exhausting themselves by bombarding the side of the glass opposed to them ; as can be well shown by having the tube bent into a V shape, for instance. CH. IV.] LENARD RAYS 29 Lenard extended Hertz's discovery in a remarkable way by skilfully constructing a tube with an outer window of very thin aluminium, so arranged as to be able to stand the atmospheric pressure outside. He then directed the cathode ray bombardment on to this window or aluminium film, and showed that the rays can penetrate it and actually come outside into the ordinary atmosphere, where they are called Lenard rays, in honour of this indefatigable investigator, a friend and disciple of Hertz. (See Fig. 1.) FlG. 1. Lenard tube for the production of Lenard rays, which were discovered before Rontgen rays. C is a cathode in high vacuum ; the anode A is a metal cylinder behind it ; the whole is screened in metal, and the cathode rays impinge on a minute hole W covered with ex- ceedingly thin aluminium foil, through which it would seem the rays emerge into the air, radiating in all directions from the aluminium window as Lenard rays L, where they are rapidly diffused and absorbed. These Lenard rays make the air phosphoresce and produce the other effects which cathode rays can produce, but they are stopped within a moderate range by the immense obstruction they meet with from a substance of the density of ordinary air. Substances seem to stop them simply in proportion to the quantity of matter which they encounter, without regard to its nature. A thick layer of air would be about as opaque as a layer of water -^^ as thick ; and even if the body put in their way is 30 FORESHADOWING OF THE ELECTRON [CH. iv. an opaque solid such as a sheet of metal, provided it is thin enough and not too massive, it will be penetrated by the rays; and phosphorescent effects will be produced on the other side of it. The rays can also affect photographic plates, and indeed do nearly all the things, though on a smaller scale and with much less penetrating power, that the later discovered Rontgen rays can do. The Lenard rays are clearly cathode rays emerged from the tube ; and it was the custom, at the date of their discovery, to think of them as flying charged particles of matter ; though the extraordinary dis- tance they could travel through common air, a distance comparable to an inch, was a manifest objection to such a hypothesis, seeing that things as big as atoms of matter cannot travel so much as xeVfy of an inch in ordinary air without many collisions. Lenard accordingly adhered to the view, advanced first by Goldstein, that they were not material but ethereal ; and although, in the sense he probably intended, this is not a tenable view for they are not Qthereal waves or anything of the nature of radiation yet, as we shall see, neither are they ordinary material particles, any more than the cathode rays are. But that is just the point which we are now considering, and we will return to them as observed by Crookes in 1879.* Nature of the Cathode Rays. We have seen that the impact of the cathode rays, speaking in language appropriate to the assumption * The biographical history of this subject is set out largely in the contemporary letters that passed between Crookes and Stokes : these have been supplied by Sir William Crookes, and will shortly be published in the Scientific Correspondence of Sir George Stokes. CH. iv.] BY CATHODE RAYS 31 that they are charged particles, will result partly in heat, or vibration of the impacted molecules ; partly in light or phosphorescence, due to the quiver of electrically charged atoms (or rather of electrical charges on atoms) as in the ordinary process of radiation ; and partly in X-rays : all of which effects are readily seen at different stages of vacuum in a Crookes' tube. The momentum of the flying particles shot off from the cathode can also be exhibited by putting into their path some form of vane or little windmill, which will then be driven mechanically, as the vanes of a radiometer are driven by the recoil of the molecules of the residual air from the warmer surface, a stress being thus set up between the vanes and their glass enclosure. In the electric vacuum tube experiment, the stress seems to be between the cathode, or gun, and a layer or stratum of the residual gas not very far from it for unless the exhaustion is very high the gradient of potential close to the cathode is very steep, so the propelling force is clearly the force of electrical repulsion, the particles travelling down the grade of potential just as they travel in ordinary electrolysis, and then proceeding for the rest of the journey by their acquired momentum. But whereas in ordinary electrolysis they meet with constant encounters and therefore progress very slowly, in a high vacuum they can fly for several inches in a free path without encountering anything, and therefore without causing any disturbance, thus giving rise to no appearance but that of the dark space. Phenomena occur only where they strike. This was the view of the nature of cathode rays taken by the whole world after Crookes' demonstration ; it was supposed that they were flying atoms, and that 32 FORESHADOWING OF THE ELECTRON [CH. iv. they were flying with ordinary molecular speed, but with a long free path much longer than would have been expected from ordinary gaseous theory. The extraordinary length of free path was somewhat difficult to reconcile with the doctrine that they were flying atoms obedient to the ordinary laws of gases ; 'except that, being subject to electrical propulsion all in the same direction, their course was more regular, and their encounters therefore fewer, or less effective in causing deflection, than if they had been moving at random. This same feature of regularity it is which confers momentum upon them ; their motion does not constitute heat, and is not to be considered as corresponding to temperature ; they are moving in orderly succession like an army or like a wind, rather than with the irregular unorganised motion appropriate, and solely appropriate, to the terms " heat " and " temperature," and to the ordinary kinetic theory of gases. Crookes indeed hazarded the surmise by one of those flashes of intuition which are sometimes vouchsafed to a discoverer but are often ridiculed by representatives of orthodox science at the time that he had obtained matter in "a fourth state ; " and even that he had got in his tube some- thing equivalent to what was contemplated in the " corpuscular " theory of light. There is some cor- respondence with fact even in this last mode of statement, when the particles are moving quickly enough, for a nuclear wave- front or ether-pulse is then travelling with them ; but how true the first was that the matter in the dark space was in a fourth state, neither solid nor liquid nor gaseous how true that was we shall presently see. Meanwhile let us summarise the evidence for the view that the cathode rays are at any rate charged CH. iv.j BY CATHODE RAYS 33 particles of some kind, in extremely rapid motion. That they are in motion must be granted from the fact of their bombardment driving mills, heating platinum, and the like ; and in order to show that they are charged, the most direct plan is to catch them in a hollow vessel connected with an electro- scope, as Perrin did ; but another plan is to show that they have the properties of an electric current. If they are charged while in motion they constitute a current, on Maxwell's theory, and therefore should be able either to deflect a magnet or to be deflected by it; and here comes one of the most simple and Electroscope FIG. 2. Simplest form of Perrin's apparatus for proving that cathode rays carry a negative charge. The rays from a pass through an earthed screen b into a hollow or Faraday vessel c. important experiments in physics at the present time. A definite form of some old experiments foreshadowed by Pliicker (1862), and developed by Hittorf, Goldstein, and many other vacuum tube observers, was arranged by Crookes in 1879, when he made the track of the rays visibly luminous by passing a pencil of them through a slit and letting them graze along the surface of a film of mica covered with phosphorescent powder, and when he then brought near them a common horseshoe magnet. When this is done the track of the rays is at once seen to be curved ; showing that it is not a beam of light we are looking at, but a torrent of charged particles ; since they behave like an electric current and are deflected by a magnet. It is ultimately the very same phenomenon as can be observed with difficulty, owing to its smallness, when a current L.E. 34 FORESHADOWING OF THE ELECTRON [CH. iv. flows through metals, an effect discovered by E. H. Hall in America, and known as the Hall effect. The fact that the particles are thrown off the cathode, being evidently vigorously repelled by it, is sufficient to suggest that they must be negatively charged ; the direction of the curvature caused by a magnetic field enables us to verify at once that the flying particles are negatively charged, and no comparable rush of positive particles in the opposite direction, or in any direction, has been observed. The speed of transmission of the positive current is very great, and it must be conveyed by a multitude of positive particles, but individually their motion is comparatively slow (see however chap. vi.). In that respect evidently the magnetic curvature of cathode rays in gases differs from the magnetic curvature of a current in metals ; viz., that whereas in metals the major action is sometimes upon the negative and sometimes upon the positive stream, according to the nature of the metal the difference, which is all that is observable, being always small, in the cathode stream it is the negative alone -that is acted upon, and so the action is always large. It seems, therefore, that for some reason or other the negatively charged bodies in a vacuum tube are much more mobile than the positive, and that the mobility of the negatively charged bodies is extreme. One striking method by which their mobility was displayed consisted in the fundamental observation by Professor Schuster* that all parts of gas in a closed vessel became conducting when an electric discharge had taken place in one corner of it; so that even though the vessel consisted of different compartments, one compartment was made feebly * Bakerian lecture 1890, Proc. Roy. Soc., vol. 47, p. 526. CH. iv.] BY CATHODE RAYS 35 conducting by a discharge in the other, provided that the two had any kind of gaseous communi- cation ; a fact which looked as if some extremely mobile particles, probably the negatively charged particles of cathode rays, could wander about to a considerable distance in a very short time and take their share in the conveyance of an electric current. The conductivity of gases appeared to be, indeed, entirely due to these loose or dissociated or detached charged particles, or ions, and where they were absent the gas did not conduct at all ; it could be broken down, being a weak dielectric, by a sufficiently strong force, but it would not leak ; whereas, when these loose charged particles were about, it leaked readily, becoming to all intents and purposes an electrolyte amenable to the feeblest electric influence. The production of this electrolytic condition is called " ionisation." The act of breaking down the air by an electric discharge was thus found to render the surrounding air for a time electrolytic. Its electrolytic quality, however, did not last long. The mobility of the particles which enabled them to travel to a considerable distance also enabled them to get rid of themselves by clinging to the sides of the vessel, or perhaps by re-uniting with some opposite charges, which after some time in their rapid journeys they must casually encounter. Prof. Townsend,* however, found that the conducting power lasted unexpectedly long if no dust was present : the dust particles apparently acting as intermediate receivers and storers of charge, promoting interchanges, which did not very * J. S. Townsend of Trinity College, Dublin, then working in the Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge, now Waynflete Professor of Physics in the University of Oxford. 36 FORESHADOWING OF THE ELECTRON [CH. iv. readily occur through direct encounters. And the time that thus elapsed before the whole of the conductivity disappeared from dust-free air suggested that the moving particles must be very small, so that intimate collisions were comparatively infrequent. The mobility or diffusiveness of the molecules of a gas depends on their mean free path, and that depends on their atomic size ; the smaller they are, the more readily can they escape collision. Hence it is that collisions are so rare in astronomy : the bodies are small compared with the spaces between them. The behaviour of charged par- ticles seemed to indicate that they must in some cases be something smaller than atoms : it seemed hardly likely that material atoms could behave in the way they did. It was recollected that it had occurred to some philosophers, among them Dr. Johnstone Stoney, that electric charges really existed on an atom in concentrated form, not diffused all over its surface but concentrated at one or more points, perhaps acting as satellites to the main bulk of the atom ; so on that view it was j ust possible that these flying particles might be not charged atoms at all, but charges without the atoms, the concentrated charges detached knocked off as it were in the violence of the discharge, and after- wards going about free. Such particles would naturally travel at an immense pace, because they would still be exposed to the full electric force that they had experienced before, and yet would have shaken off the encumbrance of the material atom with which they had been associated. It is true that no such disembodied charges, or electric ghosts, had ever been observed. All the experiments that had been made in electrostatics had been made on charged CH. iv.] BY CATHODE RAYS 37 matter, the surface or boundary of the matter acting as the locality for an electric charge ; and no other locality for a charge was known. The facts of electrolysis had suggested or proved that the atoms themselves could carry charges, and hence that if a liquid were electrified, it must be due to some of the atomic charges of one sign, appearing in overbalancing proportion at the surface ; though perhaps still in association with their respective atoms. Yet at the same time the occurrences at an electrode, where an ion plainly gave up its charge and escaped without it, indicated the possibility that perhaps the electric charge could exist alone ; at any rate that it could be handed from one atom to another, and thus might conceivably exist alone for an instant. During this momentary isolation some charges might, in the freedom of a rarefied gas discharge, possibly escape, and wander about free. To such hypothetical isolated charges, the unit charge or charge of a monad atom, the name "electron" had been given ; and when I speak of an "electron" I mean to signify the, at first purely hypothetical, isolated electric charge. Whereas by the term "ion" I always signify the atom and its j charge together. The ions consist of Faraday's anions and cations. Lord Kelvin prefers the term electrion to electron. Now if the flying particles which constitute the cathode rays were electrons rather than ions, if they were detached charges, leaving their atoms behind them (necessarily leaving those atoms positively charged), their extreme mobility and diffusiveness and high speed would be perfectly natural ; and although they would not be ' matter ' in the ordinary sense, yet no difficulty need be felt at their possessing 38 FORESHADOWING OF THE ELECTRON [CH. iv. some of the properties of matter, at any rate such properties as appertain to matter by reason of its having inertia ; because, as we have seen, an electric charge itself does possess a certain kind of imitation inertia. Hence these electrons in movement would possess momentum, and might therefore propel wind- mills (though the actual motion of the windmills in Crookes tubes seems more likely due to charge and electric repulsion than to simple momentum) ; they would possess kinetic energy, and therefore might heat a piece of platinum ; and if suddenly stopped by a massive target when travelling at a high speed they might readily give rise to phosphorescent appearances, and even to the sudden pulse of radiation known as X-rays. Indeed the existence of this last property is capable of clear deduction on electrical principles if the matter is further gone into. (See chap, ix.) The continued passage of a current through a vacuum tube cannot be explained by a torrent of electrons alone, there must be some mechanism for continually producing them fresh and fresh, near or at the cathode, else they would almost in- stantaneously get exhausted. The most probable view of the matter is that suggested by J. J. Thomson : that the current is conveyed chiefly by positive ions, which are produced in the residual gas by ionisation due to the first discharge of cathode rays. These positive ions then pass along comparatively slowly toward the cathode, creep in towards it, as best they can, in face of the bombardment ; and then at the last experiencing the violent gradient of potential in its immediate neighbourhood rush up against it and by their shock produce a fresh supply of electrons. The glow over the cathode is supposed to mark the region of this ionisation. The negative particles, thus CH. iv.] BY CATHODE RAYS 39 set free, then fly off as cathode rays, setting up fresh ionisation, and producing a copious further supply of positive ions ; on the existence of which the possi- bility of the cathode rays themselves depend. The positive and" the negative particles on this view are mutually dependent : each is the cause of each ; and when either fails to be formed in a vacuum tube it is impossible for it to conduct, even when its terminals are highly electrified ; for if the supply of either sign of ion is stopped, that of the other at once fails. This accounts for the action of ' electric valves,' wherein the positive ions are prevented from getting at the cathode in one direction, by reason of a special arrangement for concentrating an electron bombard- ment along the direct route, without any back door or side entrance for the positive ions. The provision of such a back door, even though the route thereto be long, immensely eases the conveyance of current : as was strikingly shown by Hittorf. It has been observed that any obstacle introduced into the dark space near the cathode, if it is able to check locally the access of positive ions, will throw a shadow both fore and aft, 1 one towards the cathode, and likewise one down the cathode rays, because the generation of fresh electrons is thereby locally prevented.* At this stage we may conveniently summarise the position thus : The magnitudes which need experimental deter- mination in connexion with cathode rays, in order to settle the question and determine their real nature, are the speed, the electric charge, and if possible the mass, bf the flying particles. Everything suggests that they are flying with * Schuster, Proc. Roy. Soc., xlvii., p. 557, 1890 ; Wehnelt, Wied. Ann. Ixvii., p. 421, 1899. 40 FORESHADOWING OF THE ELECTRON [CH. iv. prodigious speed, but it is desirable to make a measurement of that speed. The force of propulsion exerted on them indicates that they are highly charged ; and their penetrating power suggests that they are excessively small, so that to them ordinary solids, such as metal sheets, appear porous ; but an experimental method is necessary to determine what may be called their electrochemical equivalent, -that is to say the ratio of their mass or inertia to their electric charge, even if it be not possible to determine the mass and the charge separately. In electrolysis the electrochemical equivalent, or the ratio m/e, depends on the nature of the substance; and for hydrogen is of the order 10~ 4 in electromagnetic units, as stated in Chapter III. It is a matter of great importance to determine the value of the same ratio for the cathode rays, and to ascertain whether it varies with the substance contained in the vacuum tube, or whether it is the same for all substances being characteristic of a single variety of the flying particle and of nothing else. CHAPTER V. DETERMINATION OF SPEED AND ELECTROCHEMICAL EQUIVALENT OF CATHODE RAYS. IF the cathode rays consist of flying electrified particles they will be deflected, or their paths curved, by the proximity of a magnet : and this is a well known and prominent fact concerning them. With some care the amount of deflexion, caused by a magnetic field of known strength, may be measured. The curvature of path produced in cathode rays by a transverse magnetic field, or, the amount of spirality produced by a longitudinal magnetic field, constitutes an evident mode of attacking the problem of estimating their velocity. If the velocity is constant and the magnetic field uniform, the curve into which the stream is bent round the lines of force will manifestly be a circle ; and its course can be readily traced either directly, after Crookes' manner, by letting it graze a phosphorescent substance, or indirectly by inference from the position of a linear target placed so as to catch the deflected, rays. If the direction of velocity is inclined to the direction of the field, the course of a particle will be compounded of a circular motion round a line of force, and an unchanged rectilinear motion along it : that is to say, it will be a spiral,. 42 DETERMINATION OF SPEED [CH. v. more or less elongated, threading itself along the negative field : the direction of twist depending on the sense of the field. There is no difficulty in determining the radius of curvature r ; and the theory of normal deflexion is the simplest possible, nothing more than stating that the magnetic force H, acting on the current element eu, is the necessary deflecting or centripetal force, my?/r, required to overcome the mechanical inertia of the particles ; i.e., mu 2 - = jmeun., whence u= uKr ; e or the ratio e/m is to the velocity of the particles as the curvature of their path is to the intensity of magnetic field which curves it. Prof. Schuster of Manchester was among the first to make measure- ments of this kind. The two factors on the right of this equation are directly measurable (/u. being conventionally ignored as usual, or a better mode of expression united with H as induction-density) ; but the two factors on the left are both unknown, hence neither can be determined by this means alone,-an assumption must be made about one or other of them, or else another independent kind of experiment must be made. Assume, as many experimenters did, that u is a velocity appropriate to atoms flying in a gas of ordinary temperature, then the value of e/m comes out not so very far discrepant from the usual ionic value, measured in liquid electrolysis, viz., 10 4 c.g.s. Or, conversely, assume the usual ionic or electrolytic CH. V.] OF CATHODE RAYS 43 value for this ratio, and the cathode ray velocity comes out something quite appropriate to atoms of matter. This, however, is a trap. These accidental coin- cidences may retard progress in a most serious manner, for they satisfy the mind and deter people from investigation. It is almost impossible to be FIG. 3. Modified Perrin apparatus adopted by J. J. Thomson for, measuring the charge, and at the same time the magnetic deflexion, and sometimes the thermal energy also, of cathode rays. The rays from the cathode, after passing through a perforated anode and proceeding in a straight line, can be deflected by a magnet a measured amount, so as just to enter a hole in an earthed guard-screen D, and then a hollow cavity provided with an electrode E, whereby the aggregate charge conveyed by them is measured. completely on guard against them, and they are usually accepted until a more thorough qualitative acquaintance with the subject leads to an instinctive feeling that something is wrong somewhere. So it was in this case : the long free path and the penetrating power of the cathode rays kept insisting that the particles were not really atoms of ordinary matter, a truth which both Lenard and Crookes had instinctively grasped, in spite of much criticism 44 DETERMINATION OF SPEED [CH. v, and valid arguments the other way; so in 1897 J. J. Thomson made a much more serious attack on the whole position. He arranged that the magnet should deflect the rays into an insulated hollow vessel, connected with an electrometer and a known capacity, so that the aggregate charge of the cathode ray particles collected in a given time could be measured by the rise of potential observed (cf. Fig. 3). He also arranged that inside the hollow vessel they should fall upon a thermal junction of known heat capacity, con- nected by very thin wires to a galvanometer (acting therefore as a calorimeter), so as to measure their aggregate energy. Thus he could make the following simultaneous determinations : m u In these three equations there are four unknown quantities ; but one pair can be treated as a ratio, and another, N, can be eliminated, and thus we get 2W When these brilliant measurements were actually made in the laboratory, the atomic nature of cathode rays was, if not actually disproved, at all events rendered highly improbable ; for their speed was found to be of the order ten thousand miles per second, or even as high as ^ that of light in a UNIVERSITY i a = . pe = 10 7 x 10~ 20 = 10~ 13 centimetre, m though it might with some data be estimated as small as 10 ~ 14 .* Minuteness like that easily explains the penetrating power of cathode rays. Especially if the atoms of matter are themselves composed of such minute particles. For the interspaces will be enormous compared with the filled-up space, and a point can penetrate far into such an assemblage without striking anything. Penetrability of Matter by Electrons. The mean free path of a particle is a question of probability. In a space containing n^ obstacles to the unit volume, a space Ax will contain n = Axn l of them ; and the chances of a collision, while one of them travels a length x, will be approximately their combined areas, as targets, compared with the total area available for both hit or miss that is to say, mra 2 1.1 ., o x - ; which we may write px or -, A x where x is the " mean free path," or average distance travelled by any one particle without a collision with another, and ft the number of encounters while *See Lodge in the Electrician for March 12, 1897, vol. 38, page 644, where the size is deduced from the then just discovered Zeeman effect. L.E. G 98 ELECTRONS AND IONS [CH. ix. travelling unit distance. But in saying this we are ignoring the forces between the particles, as well as their motion, and are not considering a swing round as a collision. Nevertheless, as regards order of magnitude Ax 1 d* /yi . _ mra? n^a" tra 2 ' where d? is the cubic space allotted to each particle, while ira z is the actual bulk of each. Therefore approximately a; total space occupied a ~~ a few times the aggregate volume of the particles* a statement roughly analogous to Clausius' or Loschmidt's theorem in the kinetic theory of gases. Hence the mean free path can be estimated by considering how much space the substance of all the electrons in an atom occupies, as compared with all the space which the atom occupies itself. In other words, we have to consider what the size 10~ 13 for an electron's diameter means, as compared with the size 10" 8 for an atom's diameter. In the solar system the diameter of the earth is 24 ^ 00 th part of the diameter of its orbit round the sun. Consequently if the earth represented an electron, an atom would occupy a sphere with the sun as centre and four times the distance of the earth as radius. In other words, if an average atom is composed of electrons, they are about as far apart in that atom in proportion to their size as the planets in the solar system are in proportion to their size. In an atom of hydrogen there would have to be roughly 1,000, or say more exactly 700, electrons in order to make up the proper mass. CH. ix.] SIZE OF ELECTRON 99 In an atom of sodium, which is twenty-three times as heavy, there must be about 15,000 electrons. And in an atom of mercury there must be over 100,000 electrons, if atomic mass be wholly due to them. Consider then an atom of mercury containing 100,000 of these bodies packed in a sphere 10" 8 centimetre in diameter. One would think at first they must be crowded ; but there is plenty of room. Each electron is only 10~ 13 centimetre across, and there are only about fifty of them in a row along any diameter of the atom, whereas there might be a hundred thousand in the same length ; hence the empty space inside the atom is enormously greater than the filled spaces. At least a thousand times greater in linear dimension, or a thousand million times greater in bulk. The whole volume of the atom is 10~ 24 c.c. ; the aggregate volume of all the electrons composing the atom is 10 5 x 10~ 39 = 10~ 84 c.c. ; consequently the space left empty is 10 10 or ten thousand million times the filled space. Even inside an atom of mercury, therefore, the amount of crowding is fairly analogous to that of the planets in the solar system. For though the outer planets are spaced further apart than the inner ones, they are also bigger, to practically a compensating extent. Now, going back to what is sometimes called Loschmidt's theorem in the kinetic theory of gases, obtained roughly above mean free path ^ diameter of particle volume of space available to particles ~ combined volume of all their substance 100 ELECTRONS AND IONS [CH. ix. we have reckoned the latter fraction, in the inside of an atom of mercury, as =10 " 10 100,000 x |7r(lO- 13 ) 3 10 5 x 10' 3 Hence the mean free path of an electron inside an atom of mercury will be comparable to 10 9 times the size of an electron, i.e., it will be 10~ 4 centi- metre ; that is, it may get through, on the average, the substance of some 10,000 mercury atoms in a row, before collision with anything. In any other less dense substance it will go further. In ordinary air, on an average free journey, it would escape collision with a hundred million molecules in a room, which would be equivalent to a distance of about four inches. In the case of corpuscles plunging into a dense metal, the actual distance achieved by them is very small, only the thousandth part of a millimetre on the average, and it need by no means necessarily be a straight line; so a target of platinum succeeds in stopping them very near its surface, and enables the X-rays generated by the shock fairly to emerge. Some corpuscles will be stopped more suddenly than this, and some will travel further, but 10~ 4 centimetre, or the thousandth of a millimetre, should be com- parable with the average distance travelled in a solid as dense as platinum. Effects of an Encounter. This distance, however, gives no notion of the value of the negative acceleration during a collision, because the greater part of that thousandth of a millimetre is free flight; the stoppage occurs only as the last episode of that flight, viz. at the instant CH. ix.] COLLISION 101 of collision. The colliding masses are 100,000 to 1, so the change of velocity at impact could be esti- mated ; but the impact will really be more of an astronomical or cometary character, and the effect is analogous to the entrapping of comets when they pass near a planet, thereby rendering them per- manent members of the solar system. The ordinary behaviour of a foreign comet, which comes and goes, may be called a collision with, and rebound from, the sun; for although there is no real en- counter of main substance, that is what it would appear like if it could be seen from the depths of space ; and the two branches of the comet's hyperbolic orbit would look like straight lines of approach and recession. Comets which happen to pass very near a planet, however, are deflected, swirled round, and often virtually caught by that planet, receding only with an insignificant differential velocity which is unable to carry them away from the attraction of the sun : towards which they then drop. If they do not actually drop into it, they will continue to revolve round it in an elliptic orbit, becoming a member of the solar system, and liable ultimately to be degraded into a swarm of meteors. This is the sort of process known to occur in astronomy ; and circumstances not unlike that may attend the encounter, or apparent collision, of a furiously-flying comet-like electron with part of the massive system of an atom. The stoppage, therefore, will occur well within the limits of atomic magnitude, 10~ 8 centimetre; and so u 2 the acceleration will be of the order r = 10 26 c.g.s., and the force needed thus to stop even a single electron will be the tenth of a dyne. V 102 ELECTRONS AND IONS [CH. ix. No wonder that violent radiation -effects are pro- duced. The "power" required to stop an electron, flying with one-thirtieth of the speed of light, inside a molecular thickness, can be estimated thus 1 u energy -f time = - DMT . ^7 * ' ff *^ = 10- 27 (10 9 ) 3 10 8 = 10 8 ergs per second ; or thus = 10 again, tt which is equivalent to ten watts. (Though the time it lasts is only the 10~ 17 part of a second.) But only a small fraction of this goes into radiation. The radiating power can be estimated thus, from Larmor's expression for it, as deduced in Appendix G, /xe 2 10~ 40 -(u) 2 = 10 x 10 62 = 100 ergs per second. The rest therefore, it would appear, must take the form of heat. It is worth considering what circumstances would give radiation an advantage over heat, and vice versd. Because sometimes conspicuously the target gets heated, and sometimes X-rays are emitted. Let u be the speed and I the distance of stoppage, then u z so the force required to stop it is CH. ix.] COLLISION 103 The " power " of the blow is whereas the radiation power is 2 fu*V_pe*u*. ' \2l) ~~ = 6vP ' ,i f radiating power a u 2a therefore 6F = T . - = , total power I v vt where t is the time of stoppage, and v is the velocity of light. Hence effective radiating power depends chiefly on very sudden stoppage, and on the speed being near that of light. If the velocity is a tenth that of light, and if an electron can be stopped in some- thing like its own diameter, about 10 per cent, of the energy will go in radiation, and the rest will take other forms, presumably heat. But it would take immense " power " to effect such a stoppage as that : not less than two or three thousand kilowatts for each electron. So probably a stoppage within atomic dimension is all that can be expected, and that could be managed by something like 50 watts. But then an exceedingly small fraction of the whole only about one millionth would in that case take the form of X-rays ; their wave-shell then having a thickness comparable with molecular magnitude : whereas in the previous case it was incomparably thinner, and therefore far more penetrating. Both thicknesses however are very small compared with the wave-lengths of ordinary light. As the velocity diminishes, more and more of the energy takes the form of heat ; which agrees with 104 ELECTRONS AND IONS [CH. ix. the fact that at moderate vacua the target gets red-hot. The ratio of the radiation power to the total power, is as the dimensions of an electron to the distance light would travel during the period of the stoppage : taking the acceleration as uniform. So to get all the energy radiated it is necessary to stop a pellet moving with a tenth the speed of light in something like a tenth of its own diameter. CHAPTER X. THE ELECTRON THEORY OF CONDUCTION AND OF RADIATION. MEANWHILE the probability of the existence of elec- trons and the possibility of regarding them as the basis of all electric and of most other material phenomena, had seized hold of the imagination of several mathematical physicists, notably of Professor H. A. Lorentz and of Dr. J. Larmor. The former, who was first in the field (1892 and 1895), was driven in this direction by the problem of the astronomical aberration of light and the optics of moving media treated from the electric standpoint. The latter reached the same goal independently, from the dynamics of the free ether, on the basis of MacCullagh and Kelvin, which required discrete mobile sources of disturbance (electrons) as a basis for development. Both these philosophers endeavoured to trace all electric properties to the behaviour of electrons, usually of course in association with material atoms ; while Larmor's procedure also im- pelled him to make intelligible by conceptual ' models' the dynamical possibility of a structure in the ether which should have the properties of an electron, whether positive or negative, the two being treated as mirror images of each other and so to reduce a 106 CONDUCTION AND RADIATION [CH. x. great part of Physics to its simplest terms. This fine attempt, made in 1894, involved definite illus- trative conceptions of the structure of an electron, of its size on the theory that inertia is entirely electric, of the velocities with which electrons revolve in the molecule, and generally of an electronic theory of matter : but in absence of knowledge the mass of an electron was then naturally assumed comparable with that of a hydrogen atom. A great amount of suggestive material is to be found in Dr. Larmor's contributions to the Transactions of the Koyal Society for 1894, 5, 7 ; some of them were summarised in the book called Ether and Matter published by the Cambridge University Press in 1900. Suffice it here to say that the electron constitutes the basis of the whole treatment, and that there is supposed to be no true electric current except electrons in motion. They may move with the atoms, as in the electrolysis of liquids ; they may fly alone, as in rarefied gases ; or they may be handed on from one fixed atom to the next, as in the process of conduction in solids. Conduction. The possible modes of conduction or transmission of electricity are in fact three, which I may call respectively the bird-seed method, the bullet method, and the fire-bucket method. The bird-seed method is adopted in liquids and usually in gases of ordinary density ; it is exempli- fied in electrolysis ; the bird carries the seed with it, and only drops it when it reaches an electrode. The bullet method is the method in rarefied gases, as has been clearly realised by aid of the cathode CH. x.] CONDUCTION 107 rays : the space near the cathode represents the length between the breech and the muzzle of the gun, and the rest of the path is analogous to the trajectory of a bullet. When the projectile strikes an atom the shock may cause it to pass another on, and so continue the convection. The fire-bucket method must be the method of conduction in solids, where the atoms are not sus- ceptible of locomotion and can only pass electrons on from hand to hand ; oscillating a little in one direction to receive them, and in another direction to deliver them up, and so getting thrown gradually into the state of vibration which we call heat. But it may be observed that this need for motion, in order to pass electrons on, becomes less and less according as the body is less subject to the irregular molecular disturbance we call heat. It may be the expansion and molecular separation, or it may be the irregular jostling and disturbance, that impede easy conduction ; but certainly conduction improves as temperature falls, and transmission becomes quite easy at very low temperatures. The conduction of heterogeneous alloys is a less simple matter, being probably mixed up with back E.M.F. developed at innumerable junctions, otherwise it would be in- structive to examine the effect of low temperature on the conductivity of a metal which did not contract with cold. The extra conductivity of hot electrolytes is a totally different phenomenon : it is not true conduc- tion, but convective locomotion of ions, in their case. The same effect of temperature which lessens their viscosity increases their conductivity. Insulators are bodies where conduction can only be accomplished with violence. Metals are bodies in 108 CONDUCTION AND RADIATION [CH. x. which the transfer of an electron from one atom to another is easy, demanding no force as long as the process is not hurried a process of the nature of a diffusion. The transmission of vibrations along a chain of connected molecules may well occur through a not dissimilar kind of connection ; and hence the conduction of electricity and the conduction of heat, though really different processes, may have many points in common. A fair approximation to the phenomena of con- duction in metals has been worked out in detail by Riecke, Drude, Thomson, Lorentz, and many others ; in which the electrons are supposed to remain free for periods so long that their mean energy of motion is a function of the temperature, as in gas-theory. Most is known about electrolytic and gaseous conduction. In gaseous conduction the negative electrons, when free, fly fast ; whereas the ions generally, and all the positive charges, travel more slowly by reason of their association with matter. In liquid conduction charges of either sign are always associated with atoms, and travel only as ions, at a slow diffusion rate which was calculated by Kohlrausch, has been observed directly by myself,* Mr. Whetham and others, and is well known. The rate of transmission in solids can only be inferred, and it would appear from the Hall effect (see Larmor, Phil. Trans., Aug. 1894, p. 815), as if in one class of solids the positive were able to travel fastest, whereas in another class negative travelled fastest : a difference which is familiar in liquids. In acids, for instance, the positive charges travel much the quickest, because they are associated with light * Lodge, British Association Report, Birmingham Meeting, 1886, pp. 389-413. CH. x.] RADIATION 109 and presumably small hydrogen atoms ; and it is owing to the comparatively easy migration of the light or small hydrogen atom that acids are in general such good conductors. The Hall magnetic bend, like Faraday's magnetic rotation, is a differential effect, and would be zero if positive and negative were equally acted upon. In gases it is differential too, but there the negative charges are liable to be so free as compared with the positive, and to be so conspicuous, that the Hall effect in gases, especially in rarefied gases, is very great in comparison with the small residual effects found in liquids and solids. Consequently the effect of a magnet in curving the path of cathode rays in a Crookes tube is readily demonstrated. Radiation. But it is not only the progressive motion or loco- motion of the electric atomic appendages that we have to consider ; we must assume also that they are susceptible of motion in the atom itself, either vibrating like the bead of a kaleidophone, or re- volving in a minute orbit like an atomic satellite. Indeed it is to the concerted vibrations or revolu- tions of the system of electrons, in, or on, or round, an atom, that its radiating power is due. Matter alone has no perceptible connection with the ether, a fact which is proved in my paper in the Philo- sophical Transactions for 1893 and 1897;* it is electric charge which gives it any connection, and even then it has no viscous connection there is no connection that depends upon odd powers of velocity, so as to be of the nature of friction, t it is purely * Lodge, Phil. Trans., vol. 184, pp. 727-804, and vol. 189, pp. 149-166. t See especially Phil. Trans., vol. 189, p. 164. 110 CONDUCTION AND RADIATION [CH. x. accelerative connection ; it is only when the charge vibrates, and during its accelerative periods, that it is able to influence the ether at a distance by emission of waves.* These waves consist probably of alternations of shear, with no motion of the ether as a whole, but only a to-and-fro quiver of its equal opposite constituents over some excessively small amplitude : a kind of motion which constitutes what we know as radiation. It is not the atom pulsating as a whole which disturbs the ether, but the pulsations or vibrations, or the startings and stoppings and revolutions, of its electric charge. Acceleration of electric charge is the only known mode of originat- ing ether disturbance. But normal or centripetal acceleration, involving nothing more than change of direction, is just as effective as actual change of speed. If an electric charge is able to describe a small orbit four-hundred-billion times a second, it will emit the lowest kind of visible red light. This number of revolutions is equal to the number of seconds in about fourteen million years, or in the time since some early geologic period. If it revolves faster it will emit light of higher re- frangibility ; and the particular kind of radiation emitted by the atom of any substance, when in a fairly free state, will depend on the orbital period of its electrons, if they could be considered as inde- pendent. But if that were so, every atom would soon radiate itself to destruction. The condition that an atom must fulfil in order to have a chance of survival by retaining its energy, was given by Larmor (Phil. Mag., Dec. 1897) in the form that the vector sum of the accelerations of all its electrons, with due regard to their signs, should be permanently null. This * See Chaps. I. and IX., also Appendix G. CH. x.] MAGNETISED RADIATION 111 further condition is quite consistent with those imposed by dynamics. Every frequency of rotation will correspond to a definite line in the spectrum. But if this be its real cause, radiation must be susceptible to magnetic influence, for a revolving electric charge consti- tutes a circular current ; and if a magnetic field be started into existence with its lines threading that circuit, it must, while it is changing in intensity, cause the speed either to increase or to decrease, and so will either raise or lower the refrangibility. If electrons are revolving in every direction, and if a magnetic field is applied to them, then during the rise of the field the pace of some will be increased and of some decreased ; and this increase or decrease will not stop until the magnetic field is destroyed again. Hence it would appear that if a source of radiation is put into a magnetic field, and its lines examined with a spectroscope, they should be affected, either by way of shift or broadening, or in some other way. It happened, however, that when Dr. Larmor theo- retically perceived this, and estimated the order of magnitude of the effect to be expected, he made the assumption natural in 1895 that an electron was comparable in mass with a hydrogen atom. On this assumption, knowing what he did about the massive- ness of an atom, he calculated that the effect would be too small to see ; indeed, Faraday had, with imperfect appliances many years ago, looked for some such effect not then guided by theory, but simply with the object of trying all manner of experiments and had failed to see anything ; Prof. Tait also had been moved by theory in the same direction, but no fresh experimental attempt to examine the question was initiated. Nor was the matter publicly referred 112 CONDUCTION AND RADIATION [CH. x. to until, as hinted above, Zeeman of Amsterdam, in 1897, with a good grating and a strong electromagnet, skilfully observed a minute effect, consisting in a broadening of the lines emitted by a sodium flame placed between its poles. On seeing a two-line notice of this in Nature in December, 1896, Dr. Larmor wrote to me, saying that this must be the effect which he had thought of, but concluded must be too small to see. On receiving this intimation I immediately, with a little trouble, repeated and verified the experiment,* and exhibited it at the Royal Society soire'e in May that same year. From this simple but important beginning the large subject of the influence of a magnetic field on the radiation from different substances has been laboriously worked at ; not only by the original discoverer, but by Preston in Dublin, Michelson in America, Runge, and others ; and a whole series of important facts have been made out. Every line has been studied separately ; some lines are tripled, some quadrupled, some sextupled, and so on as said above. One mercury line is resolved into nine or perhaps eleven components. The effect is therefore not too small to see, though it needs excessively high power and per- fect appliances to display it ; and so it became evident * See Proc. Roy. Soc. t vol. 60, pp. 466, 513, and vol. 61, p. 413, or Nature, vol. 56, p. 237 ; also several articles by Lodge in The Electrician, for 1897, vol. 38. The whole matter is elucidated by Zeeman, aided by Lorentz, on the basis of theory illustrated by a picture or model of an orbitally revolving electron, which, though crude, was adequate as a guide : the small mass of the revolving particle being thereby deduced, and being in general conformity with J. J. Thomson's direct determinations of the mass of an electron some months previously. With higher ex- perimental power greater precision was reached, and an unexpected development appeared in the tripling of each line, a result which was suggested by the model, but could not have been predicted from it alone. Other lines were found to divide into more than three com- ponents, in a very suggestive but still imperfectly understood manner, CH. x.] ZEEMAN EFFECT 113 that if radiation were due to moving electrons, their motion could not be handicapped by having very much matter associated and moving with them. It became possible, indeed, by making a measurement of the amount of doubling undergone by the lines in a given field, to ascertain how much matter was associated with the revolving electric charge in any given case ; in other words, to make a determination of the electrochemical equivalent effective in radi- ation i.e., of the ratio m/e. Indeed, Professor Zeeman, with considerable skill, had made a rough determination of this kind at a very early stage, when he only saw the effect as a slight broadening of the sodium lines ; and had come to the conclusion that the electrochemical equivalent was quite different from that appropriate to electrolysis, being some thousand times smaller. He found, in fact, that the ratio e/m had in this case also the notable value already suspected in connection with cathode rays, viz., the value 10 7 c.g.s. More recent measurements have confirmed this estimate, and shown that the ratio of charge to matter in the Zeeman case is practically identical with the ratio of charge to matter in the cathode ray case ; in other words, that whatever is flying in the cathode rays is vibrating in a source of radiation ; and that if the cathode rays consist of moving electrons, radiation is due to vibrating or revolving electrons. The more the details of the Zeeman effect are studied, the clearer it becomes that the electron theory attributed to it from the first by Zeeman and H. A. Lorentz, as well as by FitzGerald and Larmor in England, is satisfactory, though not as yet fully and completely worked out. One of the earliest publications in England, both L.E. H 114 CONDUCTION AND RADIATION [CH. x. of the fact and of its elementary theory, is that given by the present writer in two articles in the Electrician for February and March, 1897,* which are worth referring to as representing incipient ideas on the subject before the full significance was grasped. The high value of the e/m ratio, viz., ^x 10 7 c.g.s., or fifty million coulombs per gramme, instead of the moderate electrolytic value, is spoken of on page 643 as a difficulty ; and a FitzGerald suggestion amounting virtually to the beginnings of an electron theory of the Zeeman effect is hinted at. Likewise an extremely short way of expressing the theory of the motion is given by the writer, in the following form : Consider the resolved part of any orbital motion projected on to a plane normal to the applied magnetic field H ; and let the angular velocity be o>, at any point of an orbit where the radius of curvature is r ; then the field will exert a radial component which will represent an increment or decrement of centripetal force -, / 2 \ a (mrur) ; whence it follows, to a first approximation of order of magnitude, that TT doo= - , 2m ' and the change of frequency caused by the magnet- isation in the transverse components of the radiation will therefore be 4-Trm' The other or longitudinal component of the original orbit will manifestly be unchanged. This is far from * See Lodge, Electrician, vol. 38, pp. 568 and 643. CH. x.] ZEEMAN EFFECT 115 being a complete and satisfactory theory, unless the projected motion happen to be circular ; but it was a brief and early attempt. An instructive and interesting method of demon- strating the Zeeman effect was devised by W. Konig and described in the Jubilee volume of Wiedemann's Annalen, 1897, of which a brief abstract is given in Nature, vol. 57, p. 402. An emission flame con- taining the salt under examination is placed in a strong magnetic field, and viewed through an absorp- tion flame, containing the same salt, by means of a doubly-refracting prism, or other double image instru- ment, so as to get two images of the emission-flame side by side. On exciting the magnet, the emission frequency, of vibrations perpendicular to the lines of force, is put out of tune with the absorption frequency, and accordingly the amount of absorption is much diminished. The result is that one of the images brightens up every time the magnet is excited ; the other image, which corresponds to vibrations along the lines of force, remaining unchanged and constitut- ing a convenient standard of brightness. CHAPTER XL FURTHER DISCUSSION OF THE ELECTRON THEORY OF THE MAGNETISATION OF LIGHT AND DE- TERMINATION OF THE m/e RATIO IN RADIATION. AMONG the early contributions that have been made to the theory of moving charges, few are more remarkable than those of Dr. Johnstone Stoney in connection with the process of radiation, long before there had been any experimental verification of the separate existence of these electrons, or of the fact that the emission of light from a substance is due to their motion. Dr. Stoney had treated them in an astronomical manner, in 1891, dealing with an electron moving round an atom as if it were a satellite moving round a planet, and had discussed the various perturbations to which they might be subject, and the effect of those perturbations on the spectrum of the light emitted.* One of the simplest kinds of perturbation, fully analysed by Newton for the motion of the moon, is what is called a progression or recession of the apses, being a slow revolution of the orbit in its own plane. Such a motion was shown to be able to * " On the Cause of Double Lines and of Equidistant Satellites in the Spectra of Gases." G. Johnstone Stoney, Transactions of the Royal Dublin Society, iv., 1888-92, pp. 563-608. CH. XL] MAGNETISATION OF LIGHT 117 originate a doublet in the spectrum ; for of the two com- ponent circular vibrations into which the motion can be analysed, one has been made more rapid and therefore its light raised in refrangibility, the other has been made slower and therefore lowered in refrangibility. Another closely allied kind of perturbation, analogous to precession of the equinoxes in the case of the earth, would result in a triplet in the spectrum. This precessional motion occurs in an orbit subject to any oblique pull or deflecting force. Instead of yielding directly to that pull, its effect is to make the axis describe a kind of cone, the kind of motion that one sees in an inclined spinning-top : the pull of gravity on a spinning- top does not make it topple over, but makes it precess. So also with a hoop or bicycle when not vertical : instead of tumbling, it turns round and round in a circuit, as long as its motion continues ; only falling when the motion ceases, or falls below a certain critical value. Hence if the orbit of an electron were subjected to an oblique or deflecting force, the effect would be, not to place it directly in the desired position per- pendicular to a line of force, but to cause it to precess. And this motion might be analysed into three components, the accelerated and retarded circular orbits above-mentioned, which would result in a doubling of the line, and a third component, viz. the one parallel to the axis, which would be unchanged and would therefore represent a spectral line in its old position, the centre of a group of three. All this was clearly perceived in connection with Dr. Zeeman's discovery, with the assistance of his great compatriot the eminent physicist, H. A. Lorentz ; whose theory was in several respects anticipatory of the experimental results. 118 MAGNETISATION OF LIGHT [CH. XL It must be observed that the light emitted by the oscillation-components, above spoken of, will be all of one definite kind, due to vibrations in one definite direction, and will therefore be polarised. The kind of polarisation must depend on the aspect from which the light is seen. If seen at right angles to the axis of precession, all three lines should be plane polar- ised the middle line at right angles to the other two. If, however, it be looked at along the axis of precession, then there should be no middle line ; because the axial vibration would then be end- on, in which direction it produces no optical effect ; and the two side lines would be circularly polarised. Fig. 15 consists of diagrams illustrative of the changes caused in a spectrum line by application of a powerful magnetic field to the source of radiation. / represents a specially simple case. The cad- mium line A, seen by rays travelling along the lines of force, resolves itself into two lines B and C which are circularly polarised in opposite directions. This is due to the acceleration of one circular component of the rectilinear or elliptical vibration and the equal retardation of the other component. // represents the same simple line seen by light travelling across the lines of force. In that case the line becomes triple ; and if A had been plane polarised, B and C are polarised in a plane at right angles to that of A'. This is due to a precessional movement of the plane of the orbital motion, the axial vibration continuing unchanged, and the two at right angles being one accelerated and the other retarded. /// and III1 represent the effect of a magnetic field, applied to a sodium source, on the con- stituents of the yellow sodium double-line. D x is CH. XL] MAGNETISATION OF LIGHT 119 resolved into a quartet, and D 2 into a sextet, when the light travels across the magnetic field. Directly Zeeman had demonstrated the fact that a magnetic field applied to a source of light was able to act as a perceptible perturbing cause, Professor Lorentz was at once able to predict the main part of that which has been here stated, about the tripling of the line seen sideways to the lines of force, and the doubling of the line seen endways, with all the polarisations as just stated ; because the lines of n tt FIG. 15. magnetic force constitute the precessional axis. And all these effects were shortly afterwards seen by Zeeman and others, and are characteristic of the simplest circular orbit. As already stated, the full meaning of these very exquisite phenomena is still very far from being unravelled. The most general theoretical result is that of Larmor (Phil. Mag., Dec. 1897) that for any atomic system, however complex, if the effectively moving electrons are all negative, while the attraction of the positive on them is centrical, each line will be divided into three, exactly as in the provisional theory of Zeeman and Lorentz. 120 MAGNETISATION OF LIGHT [CH. XL At first sight one might be inclined to suppose that the orbits would all face round and set themselves normal to the lines of force, like so many circular currents ; but that is to forget the inerbia of the travelling electron. It is manifest that since a revolving electron constitutes a circular current, its tendency will be to set itself with its plane normal to the lines of force ; but since by hypothesis the revolving electron has inertia, the current will not so set itself, but will yield to the deflecting force in an indirect manner, as a top does ; or as the oblate spinning earth does as explained by Newton in the Principia, the axis of rotation having a conical motion round the lines of force: a motion which is called "the precession of the equinoxes" in the case of the earth, and " the Zeeman effect " in the case of a radiating atom. This is an account of the chief part of the Zeeman effect, and may be regarded as the most fundamental kind of disturbance caused by a magnetic field on a source of radiation. But there may be other minor disturbances, just as in the case of the earth, whose axis is not only subject to precession, but also to nutation a nodding movement superposed upon the main motion. It is also quite possible for the middle line, or for the two outer lines, or indeed for all three lines, to be doubled ; thus giving rise not to the standard triplet, but to a quartet or a quintet or even a nonet, appearances seen and photographed by Zeeman, Preston and others. The remarkable * echelon ' spectroscope of Michelson has been in- vented just in time for application to phenomena of this kind its special function being the close examination in detail of a minute portion of a spectrum otherwise produced. CH. XT.] MAGNETISATION OF LIGHT 121 Even the two constituents of the double sodium line behave differently, when the source is magnet- ised and the light thus examined as illustrated in fig. 15 : one of the sodium lines, D 2 , which had appeared only broadened to Zeeman at first, really becomes a sextet. The other sodium or D x line becomes a quartet ; and a complete study of the behaviour, under magnetism, of all the lines and groups of lines given by different substances must result in a great extension of our knowledge in many directions ; in fact it is hardly too much to say that the discovery of Zeeman, in the light of the theory of Lorentz, has doubled the power of spectrum analysis to throw light upon the processes of radiation and the properties of atoms, and has opened up a new branch of physics a new department, as it were, of atomic astronomy, with atoms and electrons instead of planets and satellites. CHAPTER XII. INCREASE OF INERTIA DUE TO VERY RAPID MOTION. THE hypothesis to which we have been led is that the inertia of an electron is wholly of an electrical character, and is explained by the known magnetic effect of an electric charge in motion, and the con- sequent reaction to any change in that motion. Usually inertia is treated as constant and quite independent of speed ; but now arises the question whether the distribution of charge on a charged body, together with its lines of force, will remain constant and unaltered while the body is rapidly moving ; because if the distribution of lines of force is altered, then the inertia due to their lateral motion will probably be altered too. This can be made plain after referring back to Chap. II. Thus, for instance, imagine that the lines of electric force of a body in motion became more concentrated towards the axis or line of motion ; the effect would be at once to diminish the lateral component of their motion, therefore to diminish the magnetic force which that lateral component causes, and thus to diminish the apparent or electromagnetic inertia of the moving charge. On the other hand, if the lines opened out and became concentrated towards the equator, or plane H. XIL] EFFECT OF RAPID MOTION 123 normal to the line of movement, then a greater component of their motion would be of a kind suitable to excite a magnetic field ; moreover, both the fields would by this concentration increase in intensity, and the inertia would increase. Thus, then, it may be possible that electric inertia may depend in some fashion on speed, a thing unknown in ordinary mechanics. I do not say that such dependence must be untrue in ordinary ! mechanics ; on the contrary, I feel reasonably san- guine that it will be found true for matter also, when moving sufficiently fast say over a thousand miles a second, though it is unlikely that it can have a practical influence in any actual known case of rapid movement in astronomy. But however this l may be, there is no doubt that theory points to an increase of electro- magnetic inertia at excessively high speeds, and Mr. Heaviside long ago calculated its amount. It will be observed that when a charge moves, it generates circular magnetic lines of force. Now these magnetic lines are not stationary, but are them- selves moving at the same rate as the body ; hence they generate fresh electrostatic lines, i.e., cause an j electric displacement away from the axis, which dis- placement is superposed upon the original radial displacement (away from or toward the centre) due to the charge. At ordinary, at even violent speeds, this second- order electric effect is insignificant, but it is there all the time, and must not be ignored when the speed becomes extravagantly high. It rapidly rises into prominence when the speed approaches the velocity of light, but at any speed much smaller than this such a second-order effect is negligibly small. 124 INCREASE OF INERTIA [CH. XIL Its effect will be, as the annexed figure shows, to alter the arrangement of the lines of force, making them move away from the poles and concentrate towards the equator of the charged sphere, when the speed is very great ; ultimately becoming wholly concentrated upon, or parallel to, the equatorial plane, in the limit ; if the speed could attain that of light. And the electric lines of force would then be opened out into a fan or equatorial brush, like the spokes of a wheel which is rushing furiously along an elongated axle, the circumference of the FIG. 16. A is the charge, AB its line of motion, and AE its electric force in a certain direction when stationary ; EF is the magnetically induced electric component due to the motion and AF is the resultant electric force which replaces the original force AE. The magnetic force, to the motion of which EF is due, is perpendicular to the paper, and is itself caused by the motion ; hence EF is a quantity of the second order and is small for speeds distinctly less than that of light. wheel representing the direction of the magnetic field ; but this very condensation so intensifies the field as to make the inertia ultimately infinite. It might be supposed that rearrangement of the lines means that the distribution of the charge itself is altered by the motion, so that all the charge is concentrated upon the equator, whence the lines of force would start normal to the surface as usual. There are many difficulties about such a conception however (see Appendix K), and it is easier to suppose that the charge retains its distribution un- altered, on the surface of the sphere, and that each line of force starts from its original point ; but that H. xii.] DUE TO RAPID MOTION 125 it starts no longer in a direction perpendicular to the surface, when it is in rapid motion, but sets out obliquely, with a deflexion towards the equator, so as to give the arrangement above described ; like trunks of trees on a cliff or landslide which preserve their roots in situ and gradually adjust their growth to the vertical direction without being any longer perpendicular to the soil. As a matter of fact the question all depends on what hypothesis we make as to the intrinsic struc- ture of the electron. If we liken it to a perfectly conducting body with an electric charge, the charge must be confined to its surface ; and it may be proved, as Heaviside did. that the distribution will remain uniform (cf. Larmor, dEther and Matter, p. 154). Or it might be likened to a solid globe of uniform electrification. It may be something of which we have as yet no conception : but the experiments of Kaufmann probably suffice to prove that, whatever the structure is, it is symmetrical around a centre, after the general manner of a stratified spherical distribution. On the other hand these considerations can be avoided by treating the charge merely as a geometrical point from which the lines of force emanate, and ignoring its size or possible conducting power. This is the keynote of I/armor's treatment throughout his book ^Ether and Matter, and also in his earlier papers : in dealing with atomic structure it implies that the electrons in the atom are at distances apart which are great compared with their radii. Cf. the fundamental investigation of Chapter XL to be referred to below. We could hardly tell a priori which treatment would best correspond with fact, but it will turn out (see Chap. XIII.) that 126 INCREASE OF INERTIA [CH. XIL this second method of treatment is not only simpler but that it is adequate to existing knowledge, enabling numerical results to be obtained which are singularly concordant with experimentally measured results. In any case an indication of the mode of attack can be suggested thus : The magnetic force due to motion is proportional to the speed of the motion. The secondary electro- static force due to the motion of this magnetic field is likewise proportional to the same speed.* Hence the disturbance of the original uniform electrostatic field will be of the second order, u 2 /v 2 ; and when- *The value of the magnetic force at any point P, with polar coordinates r f 6, due to a charge e flying with speed U, is TI _ and is in rings round the line of motion u. It is not shown in the diagram because it is perpendicular to the paper, through P. Q FIG. 17. The electric force generated or induced by motion across this magnetic field which is necessarily at right angles to the direction of motion is fiRu ; and in this case is therefore equal to This is the secondary or induced E.M.F., to be superposed at every point on the primary or direct electric force of the charge itself along the line eP, namely e/Kr 2 ; and it is in the direction PQ, being perpen- dicular both to the magnetic field and to the motion. So the ratio of the induced to the original E.M.F., at every point in a direction 0, reckoned from the charge and axis of motion, is sin 0, which equals sin 0. In consequence of this the original direction of the stationary electric field, eP, is displaced or tilted into a position such as eQ. CH. xu.] DUE TO RAPID MOTION 127 ever we can afford to neglect quantities of this order,, the field and therefore the inertia of the moving charge will continue practically constant. But when its speed of motion begins to approach the velocity of light, say even no more than T Vth of that speed, then a perceptible disturbance is to be expected, and something like a 1 per cent, increase of inertia must occur. The complete investigation makes the inertia infinite when the speed reaches that of light (see Appendix K), but there is probably no need to press this to extremes, unless the charge were an absolute point ; clearly, however, the inertia will ! then be very great, and possibly therefore it may always be impossible to make matter, or at least charged matter, move with a speed greater than that of light. There may be ways out of this, j however, just as it is possible for a bullet to move through air with a velocity greater than that of sound. This is managed by the violent adiabatic condensation of the air in front of such a bullet, the effect being to raise the appropriate velocity of sound to the required value ; and by the ridge behind it where discontinuity makes its appearance. It seems unlikely that the ether can adjust itself to excessive speed beyond the speed of light without a change of structure akin to what would be rupture in the case of a material medium. It has been shown both by Mr. Heaviside and by Prof. J. J. Thomson that if the speed of motion is ever greater than that of light, the fan or radial plane of lines of force bends backwards and becomes a conical surface, gradually closing up as the speed further increases : in accordance with the analogy of the conical surface of discontinuity aforesaid, which 128 INCREASE OF INERTIA [CH. xn. travels with a sufficiently rapid bullet, and is demon- strated in Mr. Boys' bullet photographs. No known speed which exists in ordinary matter is sufficient to bring any variation of inertia into prominence. The quickest available carriage is the earth in its journey round the sun, 19 miles a second, or 60 times faster than a cannon ball ; but the earth's velocity is only the 10000 of the speed of light, and consequently any spurious inertia due to its orbital motion is only 1 part in a hundred million ; and even the accuracy of astronomy could not display an effect of that order of magnitude. There are a very few stars which move 200 miles a second, but even these have only one-tenth per cent, of the speed of light, and the excess inertia will be only 1 part in a million. The only known place where charges or charged atoms were known, prior to 1903, to move at speeds greater than this, was in a vacuum tube. There the cathode-propelled particles are flying 20,000 miles a second or T ] ^ n the speed of light, and they may have 1 per cent, excess inertia ; or more if they can be persuaded to go still faster. But higher speeds are now known, being obtained in the spontaneous emission of electrons and atoms by radio-active materials ; so it becomes of the greatest interest to determine the constants, and especially the inertia, for rays of this kind. CHAPTER XIII. JUSTIFICATION FOE ELECTRIC THEOEY OF INERTIA, BUT first we must ask, what justification is there for the view that each of the isolated corpuscles, on which measurements have been made, is a purely electrical corpuscle or electron without material nucleus, all of whose properties are to be explained in accordance with purely electric and magnetic laws ? Then we may proceed to discuss the further extraordinarily far-reaching hypothesis first tenta- tively put forward by Larmor in 1894, Phil. Trans., vol. 185A, p. 813, with mechanical illustration of a purely ethereal structure for such an electron that the electrons constitute matter, that atoms of matter are composed of electric charges, that the funda- mental inertia-property of matter is identical with self-induction. There is the reasonable philosophical objection to postulating two methods of explaining one thing. If inertia can be explained electrically, from the pheno- mena of charges in motion, it seems needless to require another distinct cause for it also. But this is not all that can be said ; it is quite possible that direct experimental proof will be forthcoming before long. One method suggested by Professor J. J. Thomson, for examining the nature of the corpuscles, L.E. 130 ELECTRIC THEORY OF INERTIA [CH. xm. had reference to the proportion of radiation to thermal energy developed when corpuscles encounter a target which suddenly stops them. In so far as they consist of non- electric matter they would produce only heat by their dead collision, without any direct generation of ethereal waves ; in so far as they consist of elec- tric charges they would disperse a certain amount of radiation energy ; and so the proportion of radiation to heat might afford a criterion.* Hitherto, however, no adequate measurements have been made in this direction. But there is another more likely avenue to a con- clusive result. We have seen that when an electric charge moves with a speed approaching that of light, its inertia is theoretically no longer constant, but rapidly increases and becomes infinite when the light- velocity itself is reached ; and rather complicated and different expressions for this high-speed inertia have been calculated by several mathematical physi- cists, on different views of the constitution of the electron. See Appendix K for a discussion of this difficult subject. It is possible that this fact will give us the necessary clue. For in certain cases of the production of cathode rays, or at any rate of beta rays, a speed not far short of that of light is reached, and in such cases the effects of the increased inertia can be observed. Such an experimental determination has been quite recently undertaken and executed with great skill by Dr. Kaufmann,t who employed the method indi- cated above (Chap. V.) of comparing simultaneously the electric and the magnetic deflexion of the same set of rays from a speck of radium submitted *See J. J. Thomson, Phil. Mag., April, 1899, p. 416. tSee Comptes Rendus for October 13, 1902. CH. XIIL] VARIATION OF INERTIA 131 simultaneously to an electric and a magnetic field coincident in direction. As a matter of fact the speck gives off rays of various speeds, which are differently deflected into a thin streak like a comet's tail (see fig. 18) : and it is the faint impression they make on a photographic plate in high vacuum that is measured and gives the data. Thus the velocity and the e/m ratio are both known, and to summarise briefly the result Kaufman n concluded that when the speeds ap- proached perceptibly near the velocity of light, the electrochemical equivalent m/e increased by just the amount required in accordance with pure electric theory the theory which attributes the whole of inertia to electric influence. There appeared to be no quantitative room for any extra inertia, such as that of an inert particle of non-electric matter travelling with each projectile, retaining its inertia constant at all speeds, and so contributing nothing to the rise of inertia perceived when the speed approaches within hail of that of light. We will now enter more into detail concerning this important matter. Proof of the purely electrical nature of the inertia of the ft particles shot out by Radium. There is every reason to believe that the /3 rays emitted by radium are identical with the cathode rays observable in a vacuum tube ; for both consist of a multitude of electrons or corpuscles travelling at excessively high speed ; and if a determination be made of this speed and of the electro-chemical equiva- lent for the case of P rays for instance, by the 132 ELECTRIC THEORY OF INERTIA [CH. xm. method of subjecting them both to magnetic and to electrostatic deflexions, which is the easiest way the numbers come out quite similar to the number obtained for cathode rays, viz., for m/e the value 10 ~ 7 in E.M. units, and for u something of the order 10 9 centimetres per second. But radium under favourable conditions is found to shoot out its particles with a speed exceeding even this, and in some cases to approach within hail of the limiting speed, the velocity of light. This is the very important result obtained by the German physicist W. Kaufmann, who has made an admirable series of determinations of speed and of electro- chemical equivalent for this case. The importance of obtaining these excessively high speeds should be obvious, for thereby we are enabled to test the elec- trical theory of inertia. Theoretically the inertia at high speeds is not constant, but increases according to a complicated but calculated law ; we cannot suppose that the electric charge varies in any way with motion ; hence the electrochemical equiva- lent m/e is proportional simply to the mass, and ought to be a function of the velocity u, nearly constant for ordinary values, but increasing rapidly as it approaches within hail of the velocity of light. To obtain numerical values we may apply the theory developed by Mr. Heaviside and by Prof. J. J. Thomson, with regard to the increase in momentum of a flying electric charge, over and above the natural mu value, with m considered constant, which is the value at all ordinary speeds. The formula which the latter used for the purpose of numerical calculation is one of those given in his Recent Researches ; it is quoted in his American CH. xm.] VARIATION OF INERTIA 133 Lectures on Electricity and Matter, p. 44, as / 11 mu = electric momentum = where sin = ^/-y ; and we may express it in a fairly simple form thus : The momentum of a particle of electricity moving at excessive speed is greater than the momentum of the same particle estimated on the hypothesis that its mass is constant, in a numerical ratio given by the following expression ; where the ratio of the speed to that of light, u/v 9 is expressed as the sine of a certain angle : 4 sm 2 sin 20 We will call this the ratio <(#). It is the measure of the spurious or extra inertia due to rapid motion ; the ratio of the mass at speed u to the stationary mass. We may also write it, rather more conveniently perhaps for calculation, thus : 3l ~~ 2GOs20 2 2 ~ COS 2e l-cos20~sin20 l-cos20/ Now the highest speeds measured by Kaufmann were such as the following : 2'36, 2'48, 2-59, 272, 2*85 times 10 10 cm. per sec. while the speed of light is well known to be 3*0 x 1C 10 cm. per sec. ; so the ratios u/v, corresponding to the above observed speeds, are respectively 787, '817, '863, '907, '95. These numbers therefore represent the values of sin #, to be inserted in the above formula for obtaining the 134 ELECTRIC THEORY OF INERTIA [CH. xm. theoretical ratio (0) ; namely, the ratio which expresses the number of times the mass of an electric charge, at specified high speed, exceeds its mass at low or zero speed. The successive values of <(#) come out, according o J. J. Thomson, for the above set of velocities, 1-5, 1'66, 2*0, 2-42, 3'1, and these are what must be compared with direct observation or measurement of the apparent or effective mass in each case. Now the corresponding values observed experi- mentally by Kaufmann for these same quantities that is to say the factor by which the moving mass exceeded the same mass when stationary were 1'65, 1*83, 2-04, 2'43, 3'09, showing a very remarkable degree of approximate agreement between experiment and theory, especi- ally at the higher speeds. Thus at the highest speed ever yet observed for what may be called a particle of matter, at any rate for an electron namely 2*85 x 10 10 cm. per sec. or six hundred million miles per hour the mass of the particle is three times as great as its usual value ; and naturally its momentum and energy are increased in the same proportion. Such a surprising agreement as the above, between theory and observation, removes from my mind all reasonable doubt as to the truth of the hypothesis that the inertia of electrons is electrical inertia. I regard this closeness of agreement as specially surprising, for it was not the first deduction of the experimenter, W. Kaufmann, himself: his deduction rather was that the electrical mass constitutes about one-third or one-fourth of the whole; but then he CH. XIIL] VARIATION OF INERTIA 135 used another formula for calculating it (given in Appendix K), which assumes that the charged body behaves like a conducting sphere. But when the correct deductions from the Heaviside expressions above referred to were applied, with the collaboration of M. Abraham, results practically equivalent to the above were obtained. The above agreement is attained by Professor J. J. Thomson, who applied his own theory to the results of Kaufmann, working it out on the assumption that the charge behaves like an actual point. If it is to be urged in future that an electron contains a material nucleus in addition to its electric charge, the burden of proof rests with those who maintain that thesis. The hypothesis which now holds the field is the purely electrical one. But it must be remembered that this is not the same thing as establishing an electrical theory for all matter. The inertia of an electron is purely electrical, but what about the inertia of an atom ? Who knows that the atom is wholly composed of electrons ? We do not know that as yet. Nevertheless we are now in a very central chapter of modern physics, and it is desirable to enter into the matter somewhat more in detail than in the above preliminary sketch. CHAPTER XIV. MORE ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT OF THE COM- BINED ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC DEFLEXION METHOD FOR MEASURING VELOCITY AND MASS OF THE PARTICLES IN COMPOUND RAYS. THE methods given in Chaps. V. and VI. and Chap. IX., for measuring u and e/m, made the determina- tion look very simple, if the precaution is taken of having the apparatus in vacua, so as to eliminate the troublesome conducting power of the air and obtain the electric deflexion undiluted, as J. J. Thomson first found feasible. But then the simple theory, there given, assumed that the quantities to be measured were constant, and that the deflexion to be observed in each case was a single deflexion capable of accurate measurement ; but this is often far from being the case, since the velocities of the particles differ ; and when, as in the case of radium, some of the speeds approximate to that of light, it is impossible that it can be the case, for the inertia itself then changes in a complicated way with the speed and must be treated as variable. It is easy to forget that, because it is an unusual feature in mechanics. So the deflexion cannot be a simple deflexion, the rays must be fanned out as it were into a spectrum (see fig. 18); and, since this spectrum is continuous, CH. xiv.] RADIUM RAYS 137 it will possess no features which enable anything like measurement to be made on it, unless some still further ingenious device be employed, such as, for instance, that of Kundt for making experiments on anomalous dispersion. The experiments of W. Kaufmann at Gottingen were conducted after this very fashion, and may be summarised thus: an electric and a magnetic field were simultaneously applied, in such a way as not to neutralise each other's effect but to cause deflexions FIG. 18. Diagram of the deflexion of high-velocity rays from radium. The radium is in a cavity in a lead block a ; the rays pass through an aperture 6, and are spread out by a magnetic field into a spectrum d : d 2 ; the gamma rays or any uncharged rays produce an impression at c on the photographic plate, cd, placed to receive all the rays. In a uniform field each of the lines abd is a circle. at right angles to each other. In that case if the rays from a small point source, after traversing the double field, are received upon a photographic plate at a little distance, it may be expected that the two spectra will be compounded into a single spectrum inclined at some angle corresponding to the relative strength of the two fields. But whether the inclined spectrum thus produced will be a straight line or a curve must depend upon circumstances. All that can be said, without further consideration, is that each point of the spectrum would represent a definite ratio of deflexion, and therefore a definite inertia and 138 VARIABLE MASS [CH. xiv. velocity, for each of the particles which have produced the impression at that point. And inasmuch as the particles of different speeds will be sorted out to different parts of the spectrum, it may be possible to select those points which correspond to the highest speeds, and indeed to compare the ratio of the two deflexions for various speeds, if by any means the velocity corresponding to each point can be determined. A little calculation is needed to bring out the details of the theory, and that shall be given directly, but first I will give an idea of the kind of apparatus used. Experimental Device used by W. Kaufmann. A minute quantity of radium salt in a little brass box acts as source, and a pencil of its rays penetrates a small hole, about half a millimetre diameter, in a plate of platinum at a distance of 2 centimetres from the source ; on the way, they pass between a pair of parallel and insulated plates of brass which are separated by about 2 millimetres from each other and connected to a high-tension battery of from 2,000 to 5,000 volts. After then travelling another 2 centimetres, they encounter the photographic plate placed to receive them. The apparatus is contained in a thoroughly exhausted vessel, and the whole is placed between the poles of a large electromagnet giving a nearly uniform field, so FIG. 19. Kaufmann's apparatus for measuring simultaneously the electric and magnetic deflexions of particles possessing very high velocity. The source of radiation is a minute quantity of radium placed in a box at C. All except the highest-velocity rays are deflected out of action by the magnet NS ; some of the highest-velocity rays pass upwards through the aperture D, being deflected forward by the magnetic field, and side- ways by an electric field, whose lines are coincident with the magnetic lines, between the adjustable plates PiP 2 , which are kept as highly electrified as possible through the electrodes R. These thus doubly- deflected rays then fall upon the photographic plate E, where they are spread out into an oblique sort of very minute spectrum, more or less in accordance with diagram 18 ; on which spectrum micrometric measure- ments are subsequently made. KAUFMANN'S APPARATUS 139 nEWtl H 5tfui7 140 VARIABLE MASS [CH. xiv. that the magnetic and electric fields are superposed in the same direction, their lines of force being coincident. Under these circumstances the particles will describe the beginning of a spiral, being curved round the magnetic lines and deflected along the electric lines, until they escape from the combined field and travel in their deflected direction to the photographic plate as target. The slow-moving particles, if any, will presumably strike the bounding surfaces and be stopped, only the very rapid ones will reach the plate; which is protected from alpha-rays by aluminium foil, while the undeflected gamma-rays would probably mark the direct line of fire, and thus give the geometrical "origin" of the curve or trace which would be found on the plate after long ex- posure, a curve which we may write yf(^)-> where y signifies the electric deflexion and x the magnetic. This method may be called the method of the crossed spectra. The theory can then be expressed somewhat as follows : Let the measured coordinates of any point in the spectrum, as developed on the photographic plate, be y ' x being the magnetic deflexion, and y the electric. These deflexions may be taken to represent inversely the radii of curvature r and r f produced in the rays by the respective fields H and E, in accordance with the simple mechanical equations mu 2 , mu 2 TT , -r, u.e}u, and 7- = Le, T if. XT fJLtiU U wherefore y r E CH. xiv.] AT HIGH SPEEDS 141 where ki is a constant depending on the relative effective strengths of the fields applied. In so far, therefore, as the particles which reach the plate are all emitted with nearly the same velo- city, the photographic trace will be an approximate straight line, whose slope is a measure of that velocity. But to get the electrochemical equivalent we must also write, from the above equations, r y ( } ~ 2 '' e~ u*~ E where k is another constant expressive of experi- mental conditions ; so in so far as the masses of the particles are all the same, the photographic trace or spectrum will be a parabola. But at the highest speeds mfe is not a constant, but a function of u, such a function as is given on page 133, with u = v sin 0. So calling; this function = 0(- 1 = ( -| we m T \vj T \v y) arrive at the conclusion that the actual equation to the photographic curve should be y \o y with k 2 another constant. At the highest speeds, when u approaches v the velocity of light, u cannot vary much, since it is approaching a limit, and accordingly the curve to be expected will be approximately a straight line ; the only rapid variable will then be the mass, which is getting near to its asymptotic approach to infinity, and therefore varies much more rapidly than u. The determination consists therefore in getting as 142 VARIABLE MASS [CH. xiv. clear a trace as possible, for purposes of measurement, and then by trial and error choosing a constant k l9 such as to make the squares of discrepancies of the ratio here called k 2 , from its mean value, as small as possible. If it is possible to find a value for the constant k t which shall bring out the calculated value k 2 constant within the limits of experimental uncertainty, then the form of the theoretical function ^ is to that extent verified ; and inasmuch as that function was calculated on the hypothesis of purely electrical mass, the hypothesis of the purely electrical nature of the inertia of ft rays is thereby similarly verified. Kaufmann in one of his papers says the experimental errors in his concluding series only amounted to 1*4 per cent. ; which, considering the difficulties to be overcome, is remarkably good. It is also of interest to record that the numerical value obtained for the normal or low speed value S) of for the ft rays from radium is 1'84 x 10 7 c.g.s. ; m Q while Dr. Simon's independent determination, by other means, of the same quantity for cathode rays was l*865x!0 7 ; which is likewise a satisfactory agreement. It is needless to emphasise the agreement with J. J. Thomson's much earlier measurement of the same quantity for rays from other sources. The formula employed by Dr. Kaufmann, as repre- senting the inertia, was erroneously deduced from results in a paper by Mr. Searle of Cambridge ; and on the strength of that he concluded at first that only a fraction of the mass was electric. But it was pointed out by Dr. Abraham of Gottingen that the inertia thus calculated was only appropriate to direct acceleration, or acceleration in the line of motion ; whereas what i H. xiv.] AT HIGH SPEEDS 143 was wanted was the transverse inertia, or the inertia appropriate to a deflecting force at right angles to the line of motion. This is to be obtained from the expression for the tran verse force, derivable from the expression for the energy in the ordinary manner by Lagrange's dynamical equations : at high speeds its value comes out different ; and when the formula supplied for it by Dr. Abraham was subsequently applied by Kaufmann in his calculations, it was found to correspond very nearly with the view that the whole of the inertia is electric. This formula, which in fact applies to any solid aggregation of electricity stratified spherically, is that the transverse inertia of a flying particle, m, is to the inertia of the same particle stationary or moving slowly, m , in the following ratio : m where /3 is the ratio of the velocity of the particle to the velocity of light. This formula is not identical with that employed by Thomson, possibly because the latter worked with a different idea of an electron, though it gives numerical results not exceedingly different. Primarily, how- ever, it was employed not so much as an absolute expression, as a form of function to be verified : though it was used absolutely too. Kaufmann was ultimately satisfied by finding out that his observed mass varied if anything more rapidly, not less rapidly, than theory required ; so that if the particles con- tained any outstanding inertia of a non-electrical character, such unexplained inertia must have a negative value, which presumably would be absurd. I do not myself find that Abraham's function 144 VARIABLE MASS [CH. xiv. agrees with observation, in absolute numerical value, any better than Thomson's formula does ; nor do I obtain even from Thomson's formula exactly the numbers that he quotes in his American lectures ; but to go into the whole matter would be inappro- priate here, nor is it necessary, since the theoretical differences only concern details that could doubtless be removed by a little discussion : it will only become necessary to go into them more fully when the difficulties of the experimental observation are still further overcome, and when even more accurate and trustworthy results are obtained. * I have taken the table of Kaufmann's best results, as published in the Physikalische Zeitschrift 4, 1902-3, p. 55, and calculated them out by aid of the expression given above on p. 133. The results are tabulated below. I quote his given experimental values for x and y, together with the values he gives for /3, or u/v, or what I have called sin 0; and then after reckoning out <(#), which repre- sents the theoretical ratio m/m according to Thomson's theory, I have put a column of y/x 2 ; which should correspond, at least proportionally, to the same quantity as experimentally determined ; and I like- wise quote a column of f^(/#), which represents the same quantity calculated according to Abraham's formula (p. 143). (The numerical agreement of y/x 2 with a mean mass ratio, without any constant factor other than unity, must be accidental.) *The results of Kaufmann's subsequent work will be discussed in Appendix M. AT HIGH SPEEDS 145 II 11 A CO ^ d -E O 4) '. S^'S o o o o o-2s TS rt >H OlOOOOiOOiOOO lOt^oe^iOt^ocMiOi^- I-H i (