wrd.uA THE J,i-^^ y-P^ APPROACHING END OF THE AGE VIEWED IN THE LIGHT OF HISTORY, PROPHECY, AND SCIENCE. BY H. GRATTAN GUINNESS. 'Ajt^V tp%pv, Kvpit '1tjo-oO. FIFTH EDITION. ilanlion : H ODDER AND STOUGIITON, 27, PATERNOSTER ROW. MDCCCLXXX. Butler & Tanner, The Sei.wood Printing Worics, Frome, and London. Ill (oiiipliaiKc wiih (ui icni (<)|)\ri^lit law, Ll>S/\r(lii\al ProdiKis prodiKcd this rc'|)lacciiRnt volimu' on p.ipi r that meets the ANSI Siaiulaid /:'.<). IS-IUS ho ivplacc the- invpar.ihh (kicnoi.itcd original. .^),S,S w . T (■ PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION, ^HE volume now presented to the Christian public, consists as u'ill be observed, of four parts : the first is commended to the candid consideration of those who have not j-et received the truth of the premiUcnnial advent of our Lord Jesus Christ the second and third take that truth as proved and granted! and address themselves especially to those who, holding pre- millennial views, are still looking for the manifestation of Antichrist, prior to the visible advent of Christ, those who adopt a literal interpretation of the Apocalyptic prophecies, mcludmg their chronological features-in other words, to the futurist school of prophetic interpreters. The fourth and last part, which consists of an investigation into the system oj times and seasons presented in tJie tvord and zuorlcs of " God, contains not a few original observations and discoveries, wliich, if the author mistakes not, throw fresh light on the whole subject of Scripture prophecy, and which he thinks will be found of inter- est to all students of the prophetic word, as well as, he trusts, to all lovers of the Bible. Perhaps, he cannot better introduce tlie book to the reader, than by giving a brief outline of its history. Imbued by education with the ordinary view, that a gradual improvement in the present state of things was to be expected IV PREFACE. till all the world should be converted, and a spiritual kingdom of God be universally established on earth, and that no return of Christ was to be looked for till the day of judgment at the end of the world, — the author no sooner began to study the Scriptures independently than he perceived, that this view obliged him to interpret in a forced and non-natural manner a vast variety of apparently clear and simple passages, both in the Old and New Testaments. Unable to rest satisfied with doing this, he was led to read a variety of works, both for and against premillennial views, especially that most able treatise ever penned against them, entitled '' Christ's Second Coming, will it be Premillennial ? " by Dr. David Brown, of Aberdeen. Unable to reach any decision satisfactory to himself by this study of prophetic works, the author nearly twenty years ago laid them all aside, and very carefully and critically read through the entire Bible, marking, studying and considering every passage bearing on the subject, with a view to collect the full testimony of the Word of God respecting it. This plan he would earnestly commend to those who may be in doubt as to the truth on this fundamental point. It completely set his own mind at rest, and his views have never been shaken since. That a premillennial advent of Christ is clearly predicted in the Word of God, the writer never afterwards doubted, or hesitated to preach ; but the pressing claims of incessant evangelistic labours for many years, forbad his looking further into pro- phetic subjects. A fuller acquaintance, acquired by personal observation, with the condition of the Greek and other professing Christian PREFACE. V Churches of Syria, Egypt, and Turkey, and of the effects of Mohammedan rule in the East, and also with the Papal system as developed in France and Spain, and with the Continental infidelity to which it has given rise, subsequently led the author to a careful study of the history of the Mohammedan and Papal powers, and of the prophecies of Scripture believed by many to relate to them. This resulted in a deep conviction that THOSE Powers occupy in the Word of God, as pro- minent A place as they have actually held in the HISTORY OF THE ChURCH. The remarkable events of the years 1S66-70, especially the outbreak of the Franco-German war, which put a stop to evangelistic efforts which the author had been for some time making in Paris, led him not only still further to consider the question of modern fulfilment of prophecy, but to prepare a work on the subject, which he intended to have published under the title of " Foretold and Fulfilled." This work advo- cated the Protestant or historic system of interpreting the sym- bolic prophecies of Daniel and the Apocalypse, and in doing so had necessarily to consider the question which lies at the base of the different views of unfulfilled prophecy taken by Christians — the true meafiiiig of the chronological statemc7tts contained in symbolic prophecy^ i.e., whether they are literal or whether they are figurative. In studying the masterly and exhaustive treatise of the Rev. T. R. Birks on this subject,* * "First Elements of Sacred Prophecy, including an examination of several recent Expositions, and of the Year-day Theory," by the Rev. T. R. Uirks, Fellow of Trinity Collc^'c, Cambridge. vi PREFACE. the author v/as deeply interested in a statement made on the authority of a Swiss astronomer, ]\I. De Cheseaux, that the leading prophetic periods of Scripture are demonstrably celes- tial cycles ; that is, periods as definitely marked off as such by celestial revolutions, as are our ordinary years or days. This led him to examine the nature of these cycles, and to investigate the connection between astronomic facts and Scripture chrono- logy, and thus to the discovery that the epacts of the prophetic periods of Scripture form a remarkable septiform series. Practical duties of a pressing nature connected with the foundation of the author's East London Institute for Hor.iE AND Foreign Missions,* prevented the completion of the intended volume, and the papers connected with the astronomic vieasiars of the prophetic times lay by for some years in the hands of the Rev. T. R. Birks of Cambridge. But in 1 87 6-7, when the long impending Eastern question came once more to the front, and attention was, by the tragic and eventful scenes transpiring in European Turkey, again directed to evident cotemporaneous fulfilments of prophecy, the author was strongly impressed with the duty of giving to his brethren without further delay, any light which God might have given him on this sacred and deeply interesting theme ; of adding his contribution, however small, towards the under- standing of the prophetic word, and in spite of many difficulties he has made leisure, during the last eighteen months, to com- plete his researches into the subject, and prepare the present volume for the press. * See Appendix C. PREFACE. vii In order to secure correctness in his astronomic statements, the author submitted a considerable portion of the fourth part of this work to the criticisms of Professor Adams of Cambridge, whose discovery of the planet Neptune by pure mathematical calculation, has long given him a position of the very highest eminence, as an authority in astronomic science. Professor Adams was kind enough to allow the author to read to him many (though not quite all) of his statements on " the connec- tion of Times and Seasons natural and revealed/' and he also verified some of M. De Cheseaux's calculations with reference to the cyclical character of the prophetic Times. Finding M. De Cheseaux's work in the British Museum, the author had it carefully copied for his own use, and subsequently sent it to Professor Adams that he might examine a point about wliich he had expressed some doubt, relative to the times of the equinoxes and of the summer solstice in the year of Daniel's vision 552 B.C. The following letter from Professor Adams shows ^I. De Cheseaux to have been slightly in error on tliis point,— error easily accounted for by the want, in his day, of such accurate data as more modern science supplies— but which does not in the least affect his conclusions as to the cyclical character of the prophetic Times :— Observatory, Cameridge, March iS, 1S78. ■ My dear Sir, I received the copy of De Cheseaux safely, and I ought ere this to have sent you the result of my examination into the correctness of his statements. Pray pardon the delay, which has been caused by my having been so busy. I have calculated very approximately the times of the viii PREFACE. equinoxes and solstices for the year B.C. 552, which is that given by De Cheseaux as the year of Daniel's vision, and I find the following results, expressed in mean time at Jerusalem, reckoned from midnight. d. h. m. Vernal equinox March ... 27 8 2 Summer solstice June ... 29 II 39 Autumnal equinox .., Sept. ... 29 II 51 Winter solstice Dec. ... 27 17 Hence the summer solstice and the autumnal equinox take place not far from noon at Jenisalem, but the vernal equinox takes place about four hours before noon. De Cheseaux's error appears to arise chiefly from his having supposed that the excentricity of the earth's orbit was the same in the time of Daniel as in his own time, whereas it was very sensibly greater. I have added the time of the winter solstice also, though it is not required for your purpose The fact is that the change of excentricity and place of the apse of the orbit of any planet, is a compound phenomenon, due to the combined action of all the other planets, and therefore the final result is got by compounding together several variable quantities, which have quite different and indeed incommensurable periods. I will return your copy of De Cheseaux, which is quite beautifully done, immediately, either by post or railway, as I have done with it. I remain, dear sir, Yours very tmly, J. C. Adams. As his letter did not reach the author in time to allow of his adding Professor Adams's correction to M. De Cheseaux's statement quoted on p. 404 of this work, he inserts it here.* The modern solar and lunar tables employed by Professor Adams, also showed some slight errors in M. De Cheseaux's calculations, amounting 10 about an hour in the period of 1040 years (referred to on p. 403) but in nowise invalidating the claim of that period to be considered a cycle harntonizing the • The statement refcired to has been omitted in this editioii. PREFACE. ix lunar month with the solar year, or the cyclical character of the associated prophetic periods of 1260 and 2300 years, of which it is the difference. The author has also to acknowledge his indebtedness to the kind and valued criticisms of his friends, the Rev. Henry Brooke of Dovercourt, and Philip Henry Gosse, Esq., F.R.S., of Torquay, who saw portions of the prophetic parts of this work while it was passing through the press. Their accurate acquaintance with the prophetic Scriptures, and deep reverence for the Word of God, gave the suggestions they made a special value in this principal branch of the subject dealt with. There remains to the author the grateful task of acknowledg- ing the very co?zsiderable help he has had in writing and revising this volume from the practised pen of his beloved wife, for many years the sharer of his toils in various efforts to spread in different lands the knowledge of saving or of sanctifying Truth. The part which — in spite of much wear}'ing labour by day and often by night, as Honorary Secretary of the East London Institute for Home and Foreign Missions — she has cheerfully taken in the task of preparing this work — however others may regard the result — will endear it to him while memory endures. And now the author commends this work to the candour of the Christian Reader, and above all to the blessing of God ! He alone knows how earnestly and incessantly the enlighten- ings of his own Holy Spirit have been sought, in the course of its preparation, how often the heartfelt prayer, " O send out thy light and thy truth, let them lead me," has gone up amid X PREFACE. the studies of which it is the result. The Bible has been the main field explored, in the conviction, " in thy light we shall see light ; " and in giving to the Church of Christ, the light on this high and holy subject, which has, he humbly believes, been granted in response to much prayer, he desires to ascribe to the only wise God, the giver of understanding, all glory, and honour, and praise. Of all his good gifts, knowledge, true knowledge of Him, of his works, of his word, and of his ways, is one of the best ; and we are commanded to grow in such knowledge. If this work lead his brethren in the ministry to an increased study of the Prophetic Scriptures, the author will feel richly rewarded, whether his own conclusions be received or not. He is conscious that his researches into the Divine system of times and seasons have gone hut a little way into tJie subject, but his hope is that they may serve to indicate to abler minds and pens, a vein of ore which will richly repay working. To one feature of the investigation he begs to call special attention. It deals not with theories but witpi facts : it consists not of speculations about the future, which are alto- gether foreign to it, and in which the writer has not the least inclination to indulge ; it consists in a collection of facts, and of inferences drawn from those facts. The author has endea- voured to deal with the question. What are the facts of the world's history and chronology ? What are the facts as to the nature, the objects, and the fulfilment of Scripture prophecy? What are the ascertained facts as to the plan of Providence ? What "are the/c: CONTENTS. PAGE VIII. Confinnation of the chronology thus unfolded 530 1. As to the date of the ist of Nisan, B.C. 457. Evidence afforded by the 2300 y. cycle 530 2. The "seventy weeks" as reckoned from this date with sabbatical years. Table of sabbatic years in the "seventy weeks " 530 3. That the last 70 years in the 490 commenced v.ith Herod's capture of Jerusalem 532 4. Termination of the 2300 years sanctuary cycle as reckoned from E. c. 457 in the 1260th year of the Mohammedan era. Mohammedan calendar for 1S79 532 5. The twelve jubilees extending from the end of the "seventy weeks," in A.D.34, to the commencement of Mohamme- dan reckoning, A.D. 622 534 C. Objection to the ist Nisan, B.C. 45S, as the commencement of the " seventy weeks " on the ground that it coincided with the Jewish sabbath 534 7. Answer to the objection that the passovcr moon of March 18, A. D. 29, preceded the equinox 534 S. Coincidence of the commencement of the " seventy weeks," March 20-21, i;.c. 457, with the vernal equinox . . 535 9. Harmony of the day of Ezra's reaching Jerasalem, first day of the fifth montli, July 16, B.C. 457, with an im- portant series of dates connected with the calamities and deliverancesof Jerusalem and the Jewish people . . . 536 20. Coincidence of the termination of the 2300 years cycle as reckoned from B.C. 457, vA'Ca. the termination of the 391 years predicted duration of the Ottoman " woe " . . . 540 11. Convergence of 2300 solar years from B.C. 457 and 2520 lunar years from the Babylonian subversion of the throne of David, B.C. 602, dnd bi-section of the latter period by the Hegira date, A.D. 622 540 12. Analogous 1260 lunar years, extending from the destruction of the city and temple by Nebuchadnezzar, B.C. 5S7, to the capture of Jerusalem by Omar, A.D. 637 .... 542 ^3- ^^lf> years cycle, one quarter of " seven times," extending CONTENTS. PACK from the Babylonian commencement of the "times of the Gentiles," B.C. 602, to the year of the supreme pass- over, A.D. 29 544 14. Remarkable harmony of this chronology with that of the four empires and " times of the Gentiles " as reckoned from the era of Nabonassar, K.c. 747 545 IX. Important 107S years cycle, harmonizing the year, month, and jubilee 546 X. The cycle of the precession of the equinoxes 550 XI. Cycle of the revolution of the solar perigee . ...... 559 XII. Cycle of the variation in the length of the seasons .... 560 XIII. Cycle of the excentricity of the earth's orbit "J^S XIV. That the proportion which solar revolutions bear to lunar, and diurnal to annual, is octave, or jubilaic . .- 566 XV. Growth of the epaci traced from its lowest cycles to its de- velopment in the prophetic times 571 XVI. Calendar of the " times of the Gentiles " 5S0 Part I. Calendar of the four great empires from the era of Nabonassar, — the beginning of tlic kingdom of Babylon, to the fall of the western Roman empire 5S3 Part II. Calendar of the rise, course, decline, and fall of the Papal and Moliammedan powers 607 APPENDIX B. List of authors consulted in the preparation of this work . 673 APPENDIX C. East London Institute for Home and Foreign Missions . . 692 "The natural and moral constitution and government of the world are so connected, as to make up together but one scheme : and it is highly probable, that the first is formed and carried on merely in subserviency to the latter ; as the vegetable world is for the animal, and organized bodies for minds. But the thing intended here, is, without inquiring how far the administration of the natural world is subordinate to that of the moral, only to observe the credibility, that one should be analogous or similar to the other; that therefore every act of Divine justice and goodness, may be supposed to look much beyond itself, and its immediate object ; may have some reference to other parts of God's moral administration, and to a general moral plan : and that every circumstance of this his moral govern- ment, may be adjusted beforehand with a view to the whole of it. Thus for example : the determined length of time, and the degrees and ways, in which virtue is to remain in a state of warfare and discipline, and in which wickedness is permitted to have its progress ; the times appointed for the execution of justice ; the appointed instmments of it ; the kind of rewards and punishments, and the manners of their distribution ; all particular instances of Divine justice and goodness, and every circumstance of them, may have such respects to each other, as to make up all together, a whole, connected and related in all its parts : a scheme or system, which is as properly one as the natural world is, and of the like kind." Bp. Butler. PART I. PR GRESSIVE RE VELA TION. CHAPTER I. GOU'S REVF.LATION OF HniSELF TO MAN HAS BEEN A PRO- GRESSIVE ONE. TRUTH IN GENERAL HAS BEEN REVEALED PROGRESSIVELY. — PROPHECY, THE DIVINE HISTORY OF THE FUTURE, CONSISTS OF A SERIES OF PROGRESSIVE REVEL.V- TIONS. — PRACTICAL RESULTS OF THE CO.MPREHENSION AND APPLICATION OF THIS PRINCIPLE. GOD has been pleased to make thi^e great revelations of Himself to man : his Works ; his Word ; and his Son, and these revelations have been progressive in character. Nature, the Law, the Gospel; a silent material universe, an inspired Book, a living God-man ; these are the three great steps that have led from the death and darkness of sin to that knowledge of the true God which is eternal life. A fourth revelation of God, fuller and more perfect than any, is yet to come. The only begotten Son, who is in the bosom of the Father, who is the brightness of his glory and the express image of his person, who " declared Him " when He came the first time in grace and humiliation, will de- clare Him yet more fully when He comes a second time in righteousness and in glory. Then the earth will be filled with the knowledge of the Lord, as the waters cover the sea. Each of these revelations is in itself progressive. The earth and all that is therein, attained perfection by six distinct stages, 6 PROGRESSIVE REVELATION. during the six days of creation. The angels followed with adoring wonder the fresh unfoldings of Divine wisdom, good- ness, and power, presented in the gradual formation of this great globe, and in its myriad mysteries of vegetable and ani- mal life, though to human eyes nature was presented perfect and complete. But human eyes could see at first the surface of things alone ; every advance in true science, enabling men to penetrate more deeply into the hidden wisdom of the work of God, has been a progressive revelation. And we have only begun, even now, to understand the glory of God, manifested in the universe. To us, more than to our ancestors, the heavens declare the glory of God, and the earth showeth his handi- work ; and to our children they will do so even more. The Word of God is also a progressive revelation, and so has been the Providence recorded in that Word. The Bible is composed of sixty-three separate books, written by forty various authors, during a period of 1600 years. The sacred writings develop a revelation which was continually unfolding itself through all those years ; and close with a book bearing the divinely given title of " The Revelation of Jesus Christ." The third revelation of God, that afforded by the person and work of our blessed Lord Jesus Christ, was also progres- sive. The mere fact of his birth and existence in the midst of a world of sinners, was in itself an evidence of God's love to a guilty race. Each word He spoke, each act He performed, each day He lived, unfolded more and more of God. They who saw Him saw the Father, for He was his express image ; and not until He, the Maker and Judge of all, was exposed on the cursed tree, not till from his riven side flowed the water and the blood, not till He bowed his head and gave up the ghost, never till then, was the heart of God fully unveiled ; " hereby perceive we the love of God." And it will be the same in the future ; for since finite man is destined through boundless mercy to an eternal advance in the knowledge of the infinite God, that knowledge must needs PROGRESSIVE REVELATION. be vouchsafed in progressive revelations, adapted to man's ability to receive them. And herein will lie one of the joys of heaven, to be ever learning more of Him, who is the Truth, and from Him, of all things. No student of Scripture can fail to be struck with the pro- gressive character of its teachings. On no one subject was full niformation given at the beginning ; all was revealed in germ only, and in the lapse of ages unfolded by degrees. Take, for instance, the doctrine of the Trinity : in the beginning God taught the unity of his nature, and the other truth thatln the one God there are three persons, was only intimated; suggested by certain forms of expression, as the use of a plural noun with a singular verb, which occurs several hundred times, as in Gen. i. i, Ps. Iviii. n. There were besides expressions, the accurate harmony of which with this truth, we who understand it can appreciate, but which were not revelations to those who were ignorant of it. Such for example is the divinely pre- scribed threefold form of benediction in Numbers ; and such the seraphs' threefold ascription of praise in Isaiah, followed by the Lord Jehovah's question, " Who will go for 2{s ? " The later prophets assume the doctrine as true (Isa. xlviii. i6, Isa. ix. 6) • but the New Testament alone reveals it fully. Or take again the law of love ; man's first duty towards his brother man. To the antediluvian world no law on the subject was given. To Noah, murder, the worst expression of hatred, was forbidden ; through Moses the doing of any ill to the neighbour was prohibited, either in his person, his property, his reputation or his domestic interests. By the Lord Jesus the feeling oi ?iXiy enmity was forbidden ; and not only so but posi- tive love, even to the laying down of life itself for the brother, commanded. AVhat an advance is the conception of love em- ijodicd in i Corinthians xiii. on that derived from Sinai, or even from the sermon on tlie mount. Our present object is to trace this progress in connection with the prophecies of Scripture, and more especially with those of the New Testament. PROGRESSIVE RE VELA TION. I. 7'he prophetic tcacliings of Scripture consist of a series of p I vg) -essiz 'c ra cI at ions. Its earliest predictions of any future event, have the character of outUnes, later ones fill in the sketch, and the final ones present the finished picture. It is first the bud, next the half opened blossom, and lastly the flower in full bloom. There was progress in the amount of truth revealed, as well as in the fulness of revelation on each point. The little stream- let of prophecy which sprang up in Eden and trickled down through the antediluvian ages, swelled by continual accessions, till it rushed a flowing Jordan through Israel's tribes, grew into a mighty Euphrates during the Babylonish captivity, and opened out into a vast delta around Patmos, whence its waters glide calmly into the ocean of eternity. Adam heard one brief enigmatical prediction from the voice oi God Himself. Noah sketched, in three inspired sentences, the "•reat features of human history. In the curse on Canaan was contained in embryo the iniquity of the seven nations and their conquest by Joshua ; the priority of blessing granted to Shem, similarly contained the subsequent choice of his descendant Abraham to be the heir of the world and father of the faithful. In the promise of enlargement given to Japheth, was contained the spiritual enlargement which took place when the Gentiles were received into the new covenant, and the physical en- largement accomplished in comparatively recent days by the European colonization of America, and conquest of India, both " tents of Shem." This prophecy spanned the stream of time with a few gigantic arches ; carrying us over from the vineyard of Noah to the Anglo-Saxon empires of our own day. The patriarchs learned from God many additional particulars as to the future : to Abraham was revealed the history of the descendants of his two sons, Ishmael and Isaac ; the four hun- dred years' affliction of his posterity ; the blessing of all nations through his seed, etc. Abraham, Jacob, and Moses, all saw Christs day and were glad ; Isaiah and Jeremiah revealed not PROGRESSIVE REVELATION. only the proximate judgments and deliverances of Israel, but also incarnation and atonement. The visions of Daniel pre sent not only a comprehensive but an orderly and conse- cutive prophetic narrative, of leading events, from his own da> to the end of all things, a miniature universal history. The fall of Belshazzar ; the rise of Cyrus, his conquests, the great- ness of his empire ; his successors, Cambyses, Smerdis, and Darius ; the character, power, and conduct of Xerxes ; the marvellous exploits of Alexander the Great, his sudden death, and the division of his empire ; the reigns of the Ptolemies and Seleucidoe ; the character and conquests of the Roman empire ; the destruction of Jerusalem by Titus ; the decay and division of the Roman empire ; the rise of the Papacy and its career ; its cruel persecutions of God's saints : all this and much more is foretold by the man greatly beloved. The " burdens " of the later prophets concern Syria, Egypt, Edom,Tyre, Sidon, Moab, Philistia, Kedar, Elam, Babylon, Gog and Magog, besides Judah and Ephraim. Enoch's prophecy is comprised in one verse, and touches only one theme. Isaiah's has sixty-six chapters, and touches on an immense variety of topics. From our Lord and his apostles flowed additional revelations, which opened up subjects previously veiled in mys- tery, and cast a flood of light on every important feature of the present and of the future. Thus the volume of proj)hecy grew in bulk and in scope, with the ever increasing number of individuals and of nations, and with the consequent com- plexity and importance of the events to be announced by inspiration. Further, the prophecies of any one event have also a distinctly progressive character ; they increase both in fulness and in clearness as the period of fulfilment ai)proaches. A guide, conducting a traveller to Chamcunix, before starting from Geneva points out the glittering white mountain on tlie horizon as the goal of the day's journey, and adds a few general indications of the route. When the city and its suburbs are left behind the guide ceases perhaps to speak PROGRESSIVE REVELATION. much of Mont Blanc, tells rather of the height of the Saleve round which the road winds ; from some eminence he points out the towns and villages which dot the widespread plaia beyond, and which must presently be passed; traces the windings of the Arve, speaks of Bonneville and Sallenches as marking stages of the journey, but allows the magnifi- cent terminus of their wanderings to occupy for the time a comparatively secondary place, minor but nearer objects taking up his attention. At a later period of the day, when the glorious vision of the ever nearing mountain breaks afresh upon the traveller at Sallenches, the guide pours forth clear and copious descriptions of its various parts ; other things are forgotten now, they press on ; again the nearer hills shut out the mountain summit, but the guide tells how each turn of the last picturesque and winding valley will reveal some new view of it. When it reappears the traveller is startled by the nearer magnificence of the monarch of the Alps, it rivets his eye, it absorbs his attention ; the guide enters into minute particulars, describes the different "aiguilles" and summits of the mountain, so that as he approaches them one by one, the traveller recognises them. And now Cha- mounix and the glaciers come in sight, and the traveller finds as might have been expected, that what appeared, when fifty miles off, a simple outline of uniform white, breaks up into a series of jagged peaks, with awful shadows and frozen seas lying in deep valleys between ; that the one mountain is in re- ality half a dozen, and that what appeared at a distance merely a feature of the wide horizon, has developed into a vast and intricate region, in which he may wander for weeks without exploring it all. Yet, as he gazes up at the great summit, he realizes, that it is the very same mountain he first beheld from Geneva. Thus, from the fall onwards, the triitr.iplis of the Cross have been the great theme of prophecy. Even in Eden the main character and grand result of human history were foretold. Enmity was to subsist between Satan and men, with all its fruits PROGRESSIVE RE VELA TJON. of conflict and suffering ; ultimately, the serpent's head was to be bruised, the author of evil destroyed, but the victory was to be dearly bought, for the woman's seed by whom it should be gained, should have his heel bruised in the battle. Here is the ]3ible in embryo, the sum of all history and prophecy in a germ. But what a mysterious enigma it was, what a slight shadowy oudine, what a vague though blessed prospect ! Still it was a light shining in a dark place ; its beams were feeble, but to the eye of faith it was the one glimmer that irradiated the intense gloom of the future. But what desires it must have left un- satisfied, what questions unanswered ! How long was this sore conflict to last ? By what means were the vanquished to be- come the victors? Little could Adam and Eve know on these points ; the one bright hope, like a glittering mountain top, defined their horizon ; its form was rendered indistinct by the mists of ignorance ; but it riveted their gaze, for the rest of that horizon was blank, and nought but travail and sorrow and labour in an accursed earth, lay between them and this hope. To the view of Enoch, the seventh from Adam, this sin- gle future became dual. This first prophet, announced not only blessing, but judgment to come. He saw mankind divided into two classes, the saints and the ungodly (Jude 14) ; and he foretold a coming of the Lord with the former to execute judgment on the latter. Here was an advance : the previously revealed conflict reappears, and the previously revealed victory ; but there shine out the additional truths that the conflict would not be between man and Satan alone, but between men and God, and that its termination would be effected only, by a coming of the Lord Himself to earth. In the sanctifying power of this truth Enoch walked in holy separation from the ungodly, and in holy fellowship with God, for three hundred vears, and " before his translation he had this testimony that he pleased God." To the patriaichs it was revealed that in their line should arise the promised Seed of the woman, in wliom all the families of the earth should be blessed, Jacob's dying propliecy dcs;r:nated the very tribe in which He should PROGRESSIVE RkVELATION. appear, and threw some light on his character and work. To Moses it was made known that the promised Deliverer should be a prophet, and David foretold that He should be a king and the manner of his kingdom (Psalm Ixxii.). The promise of his coming grew continually brighter and clearer ; but as yet it ap- ])eared only ojie, a glorious advent of a royal and triumphant Deliverer. What the bruising of the heel should be, was still hidden in obscurity : the double nature of Christ, his true character and work, his rejection, suffering and death, had not yet been predicted ; they had been shadowed forth, it is true, in typical actions and ordinances; but these were not understood even by the actors in them. In a wondrous historic preiiguration Abraham and Isaac, all unconsciously to themselves, had symbolised the great truth that the Eather would give the Son to be the sacrifice ; not know- ing what he said, Isaac uttered the great question of all ages : " Behold the fire and the wood ; but where is the Lamb for the burnt offering ? " and Abraham gave the prophetic reply : " My son, God will provide Himself a Lamb." But types like this, and like that of Joseph's rejection by his brethren, and exalta- tion to Egypt's throne, were not rcvclatio?is to the then exist- ing generations of men, although we in the light of the antitype can see them to have had a hidden meaning. Nor was the paschal lamb in Egypt, nor the complex system of sacrifices inaugurated by Moses, any revelation of the victim character of Christ. David in the Psalms wrote of his sufferings as well as his glories, but so little were these passages understood, that our Lord and his apostles had to expound them even in their day. But when David had fallen asleep, and Solomon's typical reign was over, when declension and decay set in, and Israel's kingdom was on the wane, when a dark night of captivity and dispersion was approaching, then revelations multiplied. The star that had so long shone in the prophetic heaven, and been regarded as one round orb, was seen to be a binary star. The objecls and results of the first coming of Christ PROGRESSIVE REVELATION. were announced, in such a way as to distinguish it from his second coming, yet not so clearly but that difficulties still left room for misconception. Many particulars and details were also added ; He was to spring out of the stem of Jesse, to be a virgin's son, and to bear the name Emmanuel ; his name moreover was to be called The Mighty God, the Everlasting Father, the Prince of Peace ; and there was to be no end of the increase of his government. The charactei of his kingdom was more fully described, and the fact revealed, that Gentiles as well as Jews, should share in its blessings. And strange new strains began to mingle in the music of the prophetic harp as Isaiah touched its strings, mournful tones which told of suffer- ing and rejection, of oppression and bruises and wounds, to be inflicted on the coming One. He was to be a holy sinbearer, a silent sufferer, a slaughtered lamb ; He was to pour out his soul unto death ; He was to have a grave ; He was to be a sub- stitute, a sin offering, an intercessor ; and only through experi- ences such as these to be " satisfied " and exalted, " and divide the spoil with the great." And Daniel, in full harmony, an nounced that Messiah should be cut off but not for Himself, and that his coming instead of bringing rest and glory to Israel, would be followed by trouble, war, and desolation. By degrees it thus became evident, that a long stretch of previously con- cealed valley, lay between the double summit of the mighty mountain, the hope of the coming and kingdom of Christ. Micah foretold that He should come out of Bethlehem, ! Zechariah that his feet should stand on the mount of Olives ; ! but who suspected that at least 1800 years were to elapse be- tween the two events ? The exact period when He should come and be cut off was foretold, though in symbolic style ; and in the same style, a glimpse was given of the interval to elapse, before He came again to be " King over all the earth." Vast i progress had been made when Malachi, closing the volume of j Old Testament prophecy, spoke of the Lord coming suddenly ! to his temple, and the Sun of righteousness rising with healing ; in his wings. How amazingly more full and correct were the PROGRESSIVE RE VELA TION. anticipations of Simeon and Anna than those of Adam and Eve ! The earlier saints could only cast a wondering gaze abroad over the earth, and up and down through unknown ages ; the later — knew the country, the city, the very build- ing i}i which, and the very date at which, the Consolation of Israel should appear ; and when at last the aged saint held in his arms the long promised woman's Seed, he spoke of salvation, and of peace in believing, and of a sword that must pierce the heart of the virgin mother, proving that the mys- tery of the bruised heel was no dark one to his heart. But yet the consummation was not come, the serpent's head was all unbruised, his power seemed mightier than ever. The goal receded as it was approached ; the kingdom of Christ was come, but it was only in a mystery. Once more the light of prophecy streams forth, the interval is filled in with copious details by our Lord and his apostles. The King is to go into a far country and to return ; the mystery not made known in other ages is revealed by the Spirit, that the Gentiles should be fellow-heirs and partakers in the promises; multitudinous fea- tures of the future are delineated by the pen of inspiration ; but the one grand old hope, the coming of Jesus Christ to rule, and reign, and judge, and destroy the devil and his works, still rises paramount to all the rest. Finally, in the Apocalypse the last stretch of country is laid open to view, each milestone of this closing stage of the journey may be as it were distinguished and counted, the mists have cleared away, the intervening hills and valleys have taken their proper places, and as each rapid revolution of our globe brings us almost consciously nearer to " that blessed hope," we gaze with ever growing admiration at its vastness, at its glories, at its unutterable height, at its awful shadows ; until as we see the old serpent, and death and hades, cast for ever into the lake of fire, and the New Jerusalem descend out of heaven, tliat the tabernacle of God may be ever- more with men, we exclaim : "It is done; the v/oman'3 seed hath bruised the serpent's head !" Thus again, the prophecies respecting the resurrection of PROGRESSIVE RE VELA TION. 1 1 the dead, and the future judgment, are few and dark in the Old Testament. Job anticipated resurrection personally, and Daniel speaks of a resurrection of part of the dead. But we have only to contrast these and similar hints, with the clear and copious predictions of i Corinthians .\v. and i Thessalonians iv., in order to be convinced of the progressive character of revela- tion on this subject. It is Christ who has brought life and im- mortality to light through the gospel. Thus again, the past and future restorations of Israel, so often blended in one prophecy in the Old Testament, are broadly distinguished in the New, and the hidden mystery of the call- ing of the Gentiles is interposed between them. Compare for 'instance Jeremiah xxx., xxxi., with Romans xi. : "the mystery of Christ ... in other ages was not made known unto the sons of men, as it is now revealed unto his holy apostles and prophets by the Spirit, that the Gentiles should be fellow- heirs, and of the same body, and partakers of his promise in Christ by the gospel " (Eph. iii. 3-7). These words are an em- phatic assertion of the principle of progressive revelation in prophecy. II. The prophecies of the A^c'di Testament ha7'c this progressive character, and divide tlieinsclves into Jive series of predictions, each series in t/te succession, being in advance of the preceding one. There are : 1. The prophecies annnnciatory of Christ, by the angels, by Zacharias, by Mary, by Elizabeth, by Simeon, and by John the Baptist. 2. The earlier prophecies of Christ Himself on earth. 3. The later prophecies of Christ : Matthew xxii.— x.w., Mark xiii., Luke xxi., John xiv. — xvi. 4. The prophetic teachings of the Holy Ghost through the apostles, contained in the Acts and in the epistles. 5. The Apocalypse, or final revelation of Christ from heaven : "the Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave to llim, to show unto his servants the things which must shortly come to pass."' PROGRESSIVE RE VELA TION. The first scries declared in general the character of Christ's person and the grand objects and results of his mission ; but they are silent as to all else. The seco7id series, or early prophecies of Christ Himself, in Matthew vii. and xiii., Mark iv., reveal the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, its foundation and gradual development, its twofold character and its final issues. That this was an ad- vance on all previous revelations may be gathered from the words of our Lord in Matthew xiii. : "Blessed are your ears, for they hear; for verily I say unto you that many prophets and righteous men have desired to hear those things which ye hear, and have not heard them.'" The later prophecies of our Lord on earth, consist almost entirely of new revelations. These embrace, the rejection of the Jews on account of their unbelief, the destruction of their city and temple, their dispersion among all nations, the treading down of Jerusalem by the Gentiles, the persecution of the Christian church, the world wide preaching of the gospel, and his own second coming, with the signs and events atend- ing it ; also his own approaching sufferings and departure to the Father, and his return to receive his people to Himself, with the coming and mission of the Holy Ghost during the interval of his absence. Much as all this was in advance of the Lord's previous prophecies. He added, after making these revelations : " I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now; howbcit, when He the Spirit of truth is come. He will guide you into all truth ; and He will show you things to come." After all therefore that had been re- vealed concerning the future, very much still remained to be made known, and was to be made known by the teaching of the Holy Ghost. Here is another distinct announcement of the principle of progressive revelation in prophecy. With the expectations thus awakened we glance next at The prophetic teachings of the Holy Ghost through the apostles. Examining the epistles in their chronological order^ we find the PROGKESSI VE RE VELA TION. two earliest, those to the church at Thessalonica, filled with the subject of the Lord's second coming and revealing much fresh truth in connection with it. It is to be accompanied by the transformation of living saints, the resurrection of dead saints, and their joint rapture to meet the Lord in the air ; the manner of his return, and (negatively) the time of it, are an- nounced. Copious and detailed descriptions of the apostasy to be developed in the Christian church are given, as also the history of the man of sin, in whose career that apostasy was to culminate ; his Satanic origin, his lying wonders and unrighteous deceptions, his consumption by the spirit of the Lord's mouth, and his destruction by the brightness of his coming, are all foretold for the first time. • One or two years later, Paul wrote his first letter to the Corinthian church, in which revelations are made fuller than any previous ones, on the subject of resurrection ; its principles, its manner, the nature of the bodies in which the saints will rise, the instantaneous transformation of the living to be effected at the sounding of the last trumpet, all these were newly revealed features. "Behold, I show you a mystery : we shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed, in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump." But, more important still, the order of this resurrection of the saints with respect to other events is mentioned : " Christ the firstfruits, afterward they that are Christ's at his coming. Then cometh the end." The resurrection of saints was to be subsequent to Christ's resurrection, prior to the end ; but how long subsequent to the one, or how long prior to the other, is not here revealed. About a year after, in his epistle to the Romans, the apostle clears up the mystery of Israel's future, and answers tlie ques- tions whether God had cast off his ancient people, whether they had stumbled that they should fall. He reveals that their judicial rejection was but for a time ; that it should terminate when the fulness of the Gentiles was brought in ; and that then all Israel should be saved, and the Deliverer return to Zion 14 rROGRESSIVE REVELATION. He thus " vindicates the ways of God to man," and shows that his gifts and calUng, are without repentance. Peter wrote his first epistle about ten years later ; but though he speaks of the revelation of Jesus Christ, and the appearing of the Chief Shepherd, he added little to the sum of what was already known on these topics. But in his second epistle, written about the year 68, he unfolds the final doom of the heavens and the earth that are now ; that they are to be burned up, the t'iements to melt with fervent heat and to be succeeded by a new heaven and a new earth wherein rigliteousness should dwell. He mentions also some particulars of the approaching apostasy, a subject on which Paul in his two letters to Timothy dwells more fully. Both apostles paint a dark pic- ture of the " last days ; " foretell scoffers, apostates, hypocrites, false teachers seduced by evil spirits to teach doctrines of devils, a form of godliness without power; and they speak also of their own near departure. Then finally, thirty years later than the writings of the other apostles, and closing the inspired volume commenced by Moses 1600 years before, we find ihe revelation made by Christ in glory to John. It is the latest gift of a glorified Saviour to his suffering church, and is entirely different in manner, scope, and style from all that precedes it. It is all but wholly devoted to prophetic truth ; it contains a full and orderly prophecy of the events that were to transpire to the end of time ; it unveils new scenes, and its dark sayings are full of glorious light. It is evident that the prophetic matter of this book, was unrevealed previous to the death and crucifixion of Christ ; for it is repre- sented as contained in a seven-sealed book, written within and on the back side. A strong angel cries with a loud voice, " Who is worthy to open the book, and to loose the seven seals thereof?" and none is found worthy save the ^'- Lamb as it had been slain,'' who is in the midst of the throne. lie comes and takes the book out of the riglit hand of Him that sits on the throne, and lie opens its seven seals. The descriptions contained in this book of the sufferings ol PROGRESSIVE RE VELA TION. the faithful church under persecution : of the sins of Babylon the great ; of the judgment to be poured upon it ; of the ad- vent of Christ and of the first resurrection ; of the millennial reign of Christ (barely mentioned elsewhere in the New Testa- ment) ; of the universal revolt at its close ; of the judgments which follow ; of the New Jerusalem ; of the new heavens and the new earth ; and of the eternal state — have no parallel in the whole compass of Scripture. Being written subsequently to the destruction of Jerusalem and the dispersion of the Jews, the Apocalypse omits reference to these events treated by earlier prophecies ; and, being addressed to the Christian church, it omits much found else- where, that is exclusively Jewish. But as regards all that was future to it, and of importance to the church of God, it pre- sents a consecutive series of visions, combining and connecting the separate revelations previously made, and adding much never before revealed. III. From these facts the following inferences may be de- duced. 1, God docs not reveal all the future at any one time, but gradually, as the knowledge of it may be needed and can be received. 2. We must not expect earlier prophecies to be equally comprehensive with later ones, nor endeavour to construct from the gospels and epistles alone, the perfect map of coming events. By its position as the last and fullest prophecy of the Bible, the Apocalypse is in advance of all other revelations, and a correct knowledge of the future is impossible apart from the study of it. No difiiculties therefore, arising from its symbolic style or apparent obscurity, should lead us to dispense with its teachings. The testimony of later prophecies should never be in the slightest degree distorted, nor anything sub- tracted from tlicir fulness, in order to bring them into harmony with earlier ones ; but, on the contrary, their copious details and more com[)reliensive teachings, must be added to all pre- i6 PROGRESSIVE REVELATION. vious revelations, and tlien allowed to modify the impressions we have received from earlier and more elementary predictions. 3. We must not therefore reject any i)articular prophetic truth because it is found " only in Revelation," but receive the teachings of this final prophecy on its inspired authority alone, when they are unconfirmed by other Scripture. 4. The Apocalypse being written for the church militant, for the dispensation to which wc belong, and the days in which we live, is indispensable to the man of God who would now be thoroughly furnished to all good works. No portion of it should be considered as unimportant, or treated as superfluous. " Blessed is he that readeth and they that hear the words of this prophecy, and keep those things that are written therein, for the time is at hand." "If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written iii this book ; and if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things that are written in tliis book" (chap. xxii. iS, 19). 5. The Apocalypse, as a precious and principal light, shining in a dark place, until the day dawn and the Day Star arise, should be allowed to cast its rich and final rays back over all the prophecies on the subjects of which it treats, in the volume which it closes ; and its consecutive visions should be employed to bind together in their proper order, the separate links of such earlier predictions. CHAPTER II. PROGRESSIVE REVELATIONS AS TO THE RELATIVE PERIOD OF THE SECOND ADVENT OF OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST. IN the light of this principle of Progressive Revelation, let us now consider the most interesting and momentous question in connection with the future, the relative period of the return of our blessed Lord and Master. Before examining the revelations of the Apocalypse on this subject, we will briefly glance at the general testimony of Scrip- ture with respect to it ; first that of the Old Testament, and then that of the New. It is impossible that those who " love his appearing " should be indifferent as to the season of their Lord's return. Even the prophets searched diligently what manner of time the Spirit of Christ which was in them did signify, when it testified before- hand, the sufferings of Christ and the glories that should follow. With much more reason, wc, who in his sufferings see our salvation, and in his glory our own eternal portion, ivc, who are espoused as a chaste virgin to Christ, and have his parting promise, " I will come again and receive you to Myself," may inquire diligently, and long to know, when we may hope to see Him as He is, and be for ever with our Lord. The more we long for an event itself, the more anxious we are to ascertain the probable period of its occurrence. It argues little love to the Lord if we do not ardently desire his return ; and it argues little desire for his return, if we never search the Scriptures, prayerfully seeking to learn from them when wc may expect it. It is true we are to let patience have her perfect work; but our patience should be "the patience of hope," not the patience of careless indifference; and lioi)C will always suggest the inquiry, how long? 1 8 PROGRESSIVE REVELATION. •' How long, O Lord our Saviour, wilt Thou remain away ? Our hearts are growing weary, that Thou dost absent stay. Oh when shall come the moment, when, brighter far than morn, The sunshine of Thy glory, shall on Thy people dawn?" It is true that ever since apostolic days it has been the bounden duty of the church to be ever watchful, ever waiting, for the return of God's Son from heaven. The teaching of Christ Himself and of his apostles, led the early generations of Christians in a very real sense, to expect the speedy return of their Lord. They took his promise " Lo, I come quickly," to mean quickly according to human calculations; we have learned by experience that it meant " quickly," counting a thousand years as one day ; and unless we have something more explicit than this by which to shape oicr expectations, we. Christians of the nineteenth century, would have little indeed to sustain our hope. A promise which has already extended over 1800 years might well extend over 1800 more, and the epiphany for which we wait be still ages distant. But Scripture contains more than general promises on this subject ; it contains many specific, orderly, and even chrono- logical prophecies. We have full and explicit inspired predictions by which to shape our expectations, and these numerous and detailed prophetic statements, do not leave us like shipwrecked sailors on a dark night, on a wild and stormy sea, deprived of chart and compass and ignorant of their bearings. If we will use them aright, they place us rather in the ppsition of a weary crew, at the end of a long and dangerous voyage, exploring by the morning twilight, the chart on which their track has been marked down, noting the thousands of miles they have sailed, recognising each high land and island they have passed on their course, and all the lights and beacons long since left behind, cheering each other as they observe that the faithful chart, whose accuracy their long experience has demonstrated, shoivs but two or three wayviarks ahead, — waymarks absolutely coming into sight, — and rejoicing in hope of a speedy entrance into a peaceful port. PROGRESSIVE REVELAl'ION. 19 But here we are met with an objection. Those who search and study the prophetic word are often rebuked by the quota- tion, " of that day and that hour knoweth no man." Now though some students of prophecy have degenerated into pro- phets, and have required to be reminded of these words, yet it is a mistake t© suppose that they forbid investigation, or render hopeless beforehand, any well grounded and intelligent conclu- sions, as to the period of our Lord's return. The day and the hour of this great event have not assuredly been revealed, but its place on the general chart of human history, has as certainly not been concealed. The analogy of the Old Testament would lead us to expect that dates would be given by which some approximation to a knowledge of the period of Christ's second coming, might, towards the close of the dispensation, be made. For however dark earlier generations of Israel may have been, as to the timo of his first coming, those who lived during the fivo centuries immediately preceding it, had the light of distinct chronologi- cal prophecy, to sustain their hopes, and guide their expecta- tions. Though Daniel's prediction of the " seventy weeks "' was expressed in symbolic language, and perhaps not under.'^tood by the generation to whom it was iirst given, yet as a matter of history, we know that it was correctly interpreted by later gene- rations, that it formed a national opinion as to the probable period of the appearance of Messiah the Prince, and that it taught the faithful, like Simeon and Anna, to be waiting for l he consolation of Israel. Is it not likely that the later generations of the Christian church, which is indwelt by the Spirit of truth, of whom Christ expressly said " He shall show you things to come" should have as clear or clearer light, as to the period of the second advent? — light, 7iot as to its day or hour, not as to its month or year, but as to its period, and especially as to its chronological relation, to other future events. From the fact that the Lord Jesus, as the New Testament abundantly proves, wished his disciples in all ages to be kept constant in love, and vigilant in holiness, by means of the continual c\\)Cc\.:x{\on PROGRESSIVE RE VELA TION. of his return, we may be sure beforehand, that the period of that event, will not be clearly revealed iti plain words, either in the Old Testament or the New. Any revelation on the subject, will be sure to be characterized, by a marked and intentional obscurity, and to be of such a character as that only " the wise shall understand" it. On tlic other hand, as the second advent must bear to other great future events, the relation either ot antecedent or subsequent, (even if not of cause or of effect,) its position relatively to thcni, must be more or less clearly indicated. For if there exist in Scripture, an orderly chronological pro- phecy of future events, containing a prediction of the second coming of Cnrist, as one link in the chain, its place, in reference to all the other events, must of course be clear. And if such a prophecy contain no direct mention of the second advent, yet if it contain a mention of events, which, from other scriptures we know to synchronize with that advent, (such as the resurrection of saints, or the destruction of antichrist and his armies,) the relative position of the advent will still be clear. Such propliecies exist ; they are given for our study ; and with the Holy Ghost as our guide we may confidently expect to learn from them with certainty, the general order of the great incidents, of the fast approaching end of the age. And not only so, but we may also expect, to be able to gather from such pro- phecies, read in the light of the whole revelation of God, an j approximate knowledge of the actual period of the coming of the ; Lord. Of this we are not, we cannot be, intended to remain ' , in ignorance, for it is with regard to prophetic chronology that \ it is expressly said, " the wise shall understand." | Let us seek then to ascertain, first from Old Testament pro- phecy, secondly from the more advanced teachings of the New Testament, and lastly from the final testimony of the Apo- calypse, the relative period of our Lord's return ; and, as far as it is revealed, its actual point, in the course of the ages of human history. The second advent of Christ could not have been distinctly PROGRESSIVE REVELATION. 21 predicted in the Old Testament as a second; that would have involved a premature revelation of Messiah's rejection by Israel, of his death and re-ascension into heaven, and of the present dispensation of grace to the Gentiles. Prophecies so clear as either to procure ox prevent their own fulfilment, were never de- livered by Divine inspiration. The two comings of Christ, at that time both future, and having one and the same object — to redeem and restore humanity and to destroy the works of the devil — are seen as one, in early prophetic vision. A coming of Christ is, however, extensively and clearly pre- dicted in the Old Testament, of a character essentially different from his past coming, and which is to be accompanied by events of transcendent importance, none of which took place in connection with his first advent. It is therefore a future coining, and in relation to the first it is a secofid. He did come in humiliation as a gracious Saviour ; He 7aiil come in glory as a righteous Judge and King. In other words, without the ex- pression being used, the second coming of Christ is foretold and described in places too numerous to mention, in the law, in the prophets, and in the psalms. The Old Testament also largely prophesies, another great future event ; it plainly teaches that before this world's history is wound up, before time gives place to eternity, an age is to occur, which is to be earth's sabbath, man's jubilee, Christ's reign : the antitype of all sabbaths from Eden onward, the antitype of Israel's jubilees, the antitype of Solomon's glorious reign of prosperity and peace. Certain Scripture statements and analogies, (apart from the Apocalypse,) lead us to suppose that the duration of this period will be 1,000 years, whence it is commonly called the millennium. By the mouth of all his holy prophets since the world began God has announced these "times of refreshing." The Lord Jesus when on earth alluded to this period, axid presented it as an ob- ject or nope to his people. "\e wnu nave loiiowed Me," He said on one occasion in reply to a question from Peter, " in the regeneration, when the Son of man shall sit on the throne of 22 PROGRESSIVE REVELATION. his glory, ye also shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel;" to Nathanael He said, " Hereafter ye shall see heaven opened, and the angels of God ascending anif descending on the Son of man." This age is called "the dis- pensation of the fulness of times," in which God "will gather together in one all things in Christ" (Eph, i. lo), in which every knee shall bow to Jesus, and every tongue confess Him Lord, to the glory of God the Father (Phil. ii. lo). It is the oft foretold, oft promised kingdom of the Son of man ; noi God's reign over the world in providence; that has existed from the beginning, and could never therefore be the object either of prophecy or of promise ; not Christ's present reign i n the hearts of his people ; not the joresent period at all, for Satan is at present usurping the throne of this world as king and God ; two thirds of mankind still worship /lim in worshipping idols, and are his obedient slaves and miserable victims ; the greater part of the other third worship and obey him indirectly, in serving sin ; and even Christ's people, the little flock who own Him as Lord, fail to obey Him perfectly. If Christ be king now, where is his honour ? How does the dread majesty of his throne assert itself? He endures with much longsuffering all manner of rebellion ; He allows his authority to be insulted, and his name blasphemed. He avenges not his own elect, who cry day and night unto Him ; He permits the oppressor to triumph, and the wicked to prosper in the earth. These things shall not be in the day of his kingdom. Ps. Ixxii. presents the manner of that kingdom. Its features are righteousness and judgment, flowing from Himself as fountain head, and from all subordinate rulers as his ministers ; the poor and needy delivered, and their oppressors crushed ; complete and universal submission of all kings and nations to Christ ; abundant peace and eternal praise. Cleariy this kingdom is not come yet. and clearly therefore it is yet to come. It is true that numerous passages speak of this present dispensation as in a certain sense the kingdom of God ; but the expression also designates a still future period, altogether PROGRESSIVE REVELATION. 23 distinct from the present in its character. This is the kingdom of God in a mystery, that will be the kingdom of God in mani- fest power and glory. And let it be remarked, this kingdom is no part of the eternal state which shall ensue when "the former things are passed away." It is the kingdom of the So?i, the kingdom in which Christ as Son of man is supreme ; but in the eternal state the Son shall have delivered up the kingdom to God, even the Father, and shall Himself be subject, that God may be all in all (i Cor. xv. 28). Now the period during which the Son possesses the kingdom, and the period which dates from his delivering it up, cannot be the same. Again, the dispensation in question, though blessed and glorious beyond all that have preceded it, is yet government- ally and nationally imperfect ; mankind will be still divided into nations (Zech. xiv. 16), speak divers languages (Dan. vii. 14), be distinguished as Jews and Gentiles, and as governors and governed (Ps. Ixxii.); whereas in the eternal state all will be under the sole and immediate government of God. And further, it is a period which, though characterized in the main by righteousness, liftf and bliss, will yet be marred by sin, death and judgment ; men wall still be mortal, and judgment will follow every transgression (Isa. Ixv. ; Zech. xiv.), while in the eternal state there will be no more sin, no more death, no more curse (Rev. xxi. . During this reign of Christ, He will have dominion from sea to sea, and from the river to the ends of the earth (Ps. Ixxii. 8); but in the eternal state there will be "no more sea." In short the former will be a kingdom characterized by the gradual and progressive subjugation of all things to Christ, in which " the last enemy that shall be destroyed is death," while the eternal state dates frorn death's destruction, and in it insubjection is unknown. This glorious age, is then a distinct one, which is \o folloic the present period, and io precede the new heavens and the new earth, in which the tabernacle of God shall be for evermore with men. PROGRESSIVE REVELATION. We have therefore a great future event, and a glorious future age, clearly predicted in Scripture, and it is a deeply momen- tous question which of the two is to come first. Is the millennial sabbath to be introduced by the coming of Christ, or to be followed by it ? Ought the cliurch to be expecting the millennium, or expecting her Lord first ? Is the Divine pro- gramme of the future, first the millennium and then the advent, or first the advent and then the millennium ? It is strange that many children of God are content to leave this great question an open one, and to continue in willing ignorance on the subject. And it is doubly strange that too many who ought, as teachers of the truth, boldly to declare the whole counsel of God, should be content to promul- gate through the entire course of their ministry, views which they hold from education and from habit, rather than as the result of research, and of strong conviction that they are the truths views which they would be at a loss to sustain by solid scriptural argument. They never perhaps preach on prophecy at all, but they constantly make use of forms of expression, and quote Scripture in connections, which tacitly and very eftcctually teach error. They thuso endorse the vaguely held traditional creed, that death is the certain prospect before each individual, and that as regards the church at large and the world, the present state of things will continue to improve gradually, until it merges into that blessed period of righteous- ness and peace, in which " the knowledge of the Lord shall cover the earth, as the waters cover the sea." This is a serious evil; scriptures misquoted are an efficient means of convey- ing unscriptural views. Multitudes of persons who have never studied the Bible on this subject, or received any direct in- struction on it, have nevertheless, from this practice on the part of their teachers, imbibed views directly contrary to the truth. And the views thus thoughtlessly imparted, and thoughtlessly received, are yet firmly held ; for mental habits arc strong. That whi"ch v.c have always heard and supposed to be true, PROGRESSIVE RE VELA TION, that which most people appear to hold as true, assumes the authority of ascertained truth in the mind, and the moment it is attacked, prejudice rises in arms to defend it. The consequence is, that notwithstanding the late large and rapid increase in the number of those who look for the coming of Christ as their own individual hope, and as the next great event in the history of the church and of the world, the majority of pro- fessing Christians, and especially those who have little or no leisure for reading and study, still retain the opposite view, look for death personally, and expect the coming of Christ to take place, only at the end of the world. Yet that coming is the grand motive uniformly presented in the New Testament to love, to obedience, to holiness, to spirituality of mind, to works of mercy, to watchfulness, to patience, to moderation and sobriety, to diligence, and to all other Christian graces.* "That blessed hope" is essential to the production of the Christian character in its perfection. What consolation it affords in bereavement and affliction ! What holy restraint it is calculated to exercise, in prosperity and joy, and what an incentive it supplies to exertion in the Christian work and warfare ! And who is to blame that its power is so little felt by Christians in general ? How shall they hear without a teacher ? If their ministers never directly teach them the truth on this point, by expounding to them the numerous passages bearing on it in the New Testament, but leave them in ignorance or lead them indirectly into error, v/ill the Great Shepherd of the sheep hold such under shepherds guiltless ? Earnestly would we entreat all our brethren in the ministry, to "preach the word" on this great subject, io give it in their ministry, the prominence it has in tJi^ir Bibles; to bring it in, whenever and wherever Scripture brings it in, and that is in connection with almost every topic of Christian privilege and duty. * I Thess. iii. 13 ; Col. iii. 4, 5; Titus ii. 11-13 ; i John ii. 2S, iii. 2.3; Phil. iii. 20, 21 ; Matt. xvi. 27 ; Rev. xxii. 12; Matt. .\xv. 13: Luke xii. 35, xviii. 7 ; James v. 7, S ; i Pot. i. 13 ; ]\Iall. xxiv. 46 ; i I'et. v. 1-4. 26 PROGRESSIVE REVELATION. It is vain to urge that the uncertainty of life and the possible nearness of death, ai'e motives as powerful as the coming of Christ. Death can never be an object of hope to a Christian, nor a source of consolation ; God never intended it to be such ; it has lost its sting indeed to a believer, but it remains and must ever remain, a painful, humbling, afflictive, repulsive pro- pect ; salvation itself imparts no lustre to death. It must be so ; " it is sin's great conquest, and Satan's chief work, the fulness of sorrow and affliction, the triumph of corruption, the fulfilment of the curse. Oh it is a strange delusion of Satan to have made the capital curse of God eclipse the capital promise of God ! Satan's consummated kingdom over the body to take that place in our thoughts, which Christ's consummated kingdom in the body and spirit, even the resurrection, was meant to take." Nor is it believers only who suffer from the habitual omission of a cardinal doctrine of Scripture in the teaching they hear from the pulpit. Who shall estimate the injustice done thereby to unbelievers? The coining of the Lord drawcth 7iigh ! AVhy is not the fact, the (for them) azoful fact, proclaimed aloud in their hearing, and applied with all the earnestness of love, to arouse the sleeper from his dream, to destroy the delusions of the false professor, to unmask the hypocrite to himself, to warn the wicked from his way ? The coming of the Lord draweth nigh ; to them who know not God and obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ, that coming must bring everlasting destruction ; on them it must fall as a fiery vengeance. Should they not be faithfully forewarned of their danger? Should they have the right to reproach their teachers that they sounded not the trumpet though they saw the sword approaching? What saith the Lord ? " If the watchman see the sivord come, and blow not the trumpet, and the people be not warned ; if the sword come and take any person from among them, he is taken away in his iniquity, but his blood will I require at the watchman's hand " (Ezek. xxxiii. 6). Let sinners be startled by the announcement " the Judge PROGRESSIVE REVELATION. 27 STANDETH AT THE DOOR," and not sootlicd by the sound, of a sofdy approaching millennium. Let them be warned of tlie speedy dawn of a day of retribution, and not led to conclude it, at least a thousand years distant. If the preachers of the word will fling carelessly aside, one of the bdst weapons in the armoury of truth, can they wonder that their work is not as effective as it might be? If they would fain see conversions numerous as in apostolic days, let them preach the apostolic preaching, in which not only the past, but the future advent of Christ, had a grand and prominent place. The two prophets of the Old Testament who furnish tlie most conclusive evidence on this subject are Daniel and Zechariah. The former, a royal captive from 'Judxa, was a pure and faithful witness for God in the corrupt, gentile court of Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon, during the time of the Babylonish captivity of Israel. There is something singularly magnificent and massive in this prophet's interpret- ation of Nebuchadnezzar's divinely sent dream. Unencum- bered by detail, the grand outline of this fundamental and far- reaching prophecy, is sketched with the few but firm and telling touches of a master hand ; like the blue vault of heaven, "majestic in its own simplicity," and embracing in one vast span the whole extent and circumference of earth, it seems to arch in the entire future of the world, with celestial ease and stability. It starts from the time then present, and tcnninatcs on the verge of eternity. Its language is intelligible, and indeed can scarcely be misunderstood. Brief and condensed in the ex- treme, it lights only on the salient points, the mountain tops as it were, of human history ; but in so doing it must of course light on its most elevated and important summit, the glorious epiphany of the great God and our Saviour Jesus ChrisL Whereabouts in the chain does it place that summit? This is the point on which we now seek its testimony. Let the reader ponder it and reply. 28 PROGRESSIVE REVELATION. The Vision of Nebuchadnezzar, King of Babylon, to WHOM God had given universal dominion. 1. Thou, O king, sawest and behold a great image. 2. His head was of fine gold ; 3. His breast and his arms of silver ; 4. His belly and his thighs of brass ; 5. His legs of iron, and his feet part of iron and part of clay. 6. A stone vv'as cut out without hands ; 7. // smote the image on Jiis feet ; 8. It brake in pieces the iron, the clay, the brass, the silver, and the gold ; 9. It became a great mountain ; 10. It filled the whole earth. The Interpretation. 1. Thou art this head of gold ; 2. After thee shall arise another kingdom ; 3. And a third kingdom of brass ; 4. And the fourth kingdom shall be strong as iron • 5. That kingdom shall be divided ; 6. In the days of these kings, 7. The God of heaven shall set vpa kingdom; 8. It shall never be destroyed, 9. It shall consume all these kingdoms, 10. It shall stand for ever. The dream is certain and the interpretation thereof is sure. A succession of four similar universal earthly empires is fore- told, and that tliey are to be followed by a fifth, the empire of the stone. The first four would be established and ruled by men, the last by " the God of heaven." The first four would be destroyed, the last would destroy them. The first four would be smitten and broken in pieces, the last would never be destroyed. The first four would form one great PROGRESSIVE REVELATION. image ; the last would become a great motaitain, and fill the whole earth. The first four would be consumed and carried away ; the last would stand for ever. By the universal consent of the church of all ages, and of all sections, the first four are allowed to be the Babylonian, the Persian, the Grecian, and the Roman empires ; and the last the still future kingdom of the Son of man. The internal scriptural and historical evidence in favour of this interpret- ation, is so overwhelming, and the agreement of all students and commentators, of the early church, of the Greek and Roman Catholic churches, and of all Protestant churches, so complete, that the few who have of late years ventured to call it in question, must be regarded as rash, unsafe, presump- tuous guides, who would destroy the very basis of all sound and solid interpretation of Scripture prophecy. It were super- fluous to argue the point in a work like this; those who require it can easily find abundant evidence, and that of a most convincing character and edifying nature.* We take it for granted therefore that this vision presents us with a brief historic outline, of the four great empires which have in succession held universal sway. It presents the last of the four, in two successive stages, first as legs of pure iron, secondly as ten toes composed ot a mixture of iron and clay; representing under these emblems, first the Roman empire in its undivided imperial strength, and secondly the same empire in its divided condition. During this last stage of the last empire, occurs a super- natural and tremendous revolution. All the previous changes had followed each other in the ordinary and natural course, and the kingdoms were in some senses a continuation of each other, for the great image is one. But now a kingdom that is no part of the image, that owns a supernatural origin, smites the image, grinds it to powc^er, takes its place, blots it out of Sec Uiiks' "tlcmcnli of I'lophccy 30 PKOGRESSJVE REVELATION. existence, and fills the whole earth. This fall of the stone cut out without hands, must symbolise something immensely more important and fundamental, than any political change the world has ever seen. Tremendous critical revolutions, such as the overthrow of Babylon by Cyrus, and of Persia's power by Alexander the Great, have in this prophecy been portrayed simply by the quiet change from one metal to another, in the parts of an unbroken image. What then is the great event symbolised hy i\\c fani?!g of the stone, which puts an end to the image altogether, and precedes the establishment on earth of the kingdom of the God of heaven ? Is it, as some assert, the first advent of Christ, to establish Christianity ? Impossible ! for the stone falls 07i i/ie feet of the image. The first advent took place in the time of the undivided imperial iron strength of the Roman empire, not after its decay and division into many kingdoms. Christianity had already been established for centuries, as the religion of the Roman empire, before the state of things symbolised by the ten toes of iron and clay arose. Besides, the destruction of the image is attributed to the fa/l of the stone, not to its gradual expansion into a great mountain which fills the whole earth. Now Christianity did not destroy all earthly monarchy, at the time of its advent, or in its early ages. On the contrary ! Its Founder suffered under Pontius Pilate the Roman governor, and his apostles were martyred by Nero and Domitian. Nothing whatever answering to the crushing, destructive fall of the stone took place at that time. The development of the stone into a mountain does not I'egin till the image /las />een " broken to pieces together, and become like the chaff of the summer threshing-floor." Now the gra- dual growth of Christianity has been taking place while the image still stands, and cannot therefore be the thing intended by this striking symbol. Besides this, the spiritual kingdom of God now established in the hearts of men, is in no respect similar to the great universal earthly empires which form the four first of this series. It is not of the world ; it employs not PROGRESSIVE REVELATION. 31 the sword of conquest ; it does not embrace as its subjects all within a certain territory ; it is invisible, spiritual, heavenly. The empire of the stone is a fifth analogous to the other four, though of supernatural origin, wider extent, and longer dura- tion ; it is the universal empire of earth ruled directly by the God of heaven. What then must be the transcendent event symbolised by the falling from above, with destructive force, on the feet of the image, (or final form of earthly monarchy,) of a stone cut out without hands ? What can it be but the second coming of Christ with all his saints, to execute judgment on the ungodly, and to reign in righteousness and glory ? The symbol employed, a stone cut out without hands, is a most appropriate emblem of Christ and his church ; thai church which, as other scriptures show, is to be associated with him in the work of judgment. A stone cut out without hands is a miracle ; Christ in his birth, in his resurrection, was such ; and we his people are even now, " born not of the will of man, or of the will of the flesh, but of God " as to our spiritual natures, and our bodies are to be in the resur- rection " quickened by his Spirit which dwelleth in us." Many other emblems present Christ and his people as one. They form one vine, one body, one temple; so here, one stone. Our Lord applies this emblem to Himself, in a way that seems almost an allusion to this prophecy : " whosoever shall fall on this stone shall be broken, but on whomsoever it shall fall it will grind him to powder." Peter applies it to the saints, " ye also as living stones." And Paul speaks of believers under the same figure as "builded together' for an habitation of God through the Spirit." For more than 1800 years this mystic stone has been in process of cutting out. When " the trumpet shall sound and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed," the separation will be complete, and the stone will/?// on the feet of the image; that is, the Lord will come "with ten thousands of his saints, to execute judgment upon all." Earthly jjolities will then crumble for ever into PROGRESSIVE REVELATIO.W dust ; empires, monarchies, and republics alilce, will become as the chaff of the summer threshing-floor ; " the Lord shall be king over all the earth," and alone exalted in that day. Here then we have the first distinct answer to our inquiry, as to the relative position of the second advent. On the authority of this prophecy alone we may boldly assert, that it is destined to occur at the close of the i)resent divided state of the Roman empire, and prior to the establish- ment of the millennial reign of Christ. And moreover, as the parts of the image bear a certain proportion to each other, we have some data by wdiich to form an approximation to its actual period ; for the tenfold division of the Roman empire having already existed twelve or thirteen centuries, a strong presumpr tion arises that its close must be at hand. We turn now to the second great prophecy of Daniel in the seventh chapter of his book. The following are the leading points of the vision and of the interpretation respectively. Daniel's Vision of the Four Great Beasts. 1. Four great beasts came up from the sca^ diverse one from another. 2. The first like a lion, another li!:e a bear, another like a leopard. 3. A fourth beast, dreadful, and terrible, and strong exceed- ingly. 4. It was diverse from all the beasts that were before it, and it had ten horns. 5. There came up among them another little horn. 6. In this horn were eyes like the eyes of a man, and a mouth speaking great things, 7. The same horn made war with the saints and prevailed against them. 8. Until the Ancient of Days came, and 9. Judgment was given to the saints of the Most High ; and 10. The time came that the saints possessed the kingdom. PROGRESSIVE REVELATION. 33 The Interpretation. 1. These great beasts which are four, are four kingdoms. 2. The fourth beast shall be the fourth kingdom upon earth. 3. The ten horns are ten kings (or kingdoms) that shall irise. 4. Another shall arise after them, diverse from the first (ten). 5. And he shall speak great words against the Most High. 6. He shall wear out the saints of the Most High; 7. They shall be given into his hand, until a time, and times, and the dividing of time. 8. But the judgment shall sit, and they shall take away his dominion. 9. The kingdom shall be given to the people of the saints of the Most High ; 10. Whose kingdom is an everlasting kingdom. Nebuchadnezzar beheld the former vision, and Daniel interpreted; now the prophet beholds, and an angel inter- prets. The subject is in both visions in the main the same ; but the second has many additional features. The four great empires of earth, appear under strangely contrasted symbols, to the king and to the prophet. In the former case a worldly idolater looked up, and beheld a great fourfold image of earthly dominion; it was terrible, yet attractive to him in its brilliancy. In the latter case a man of God looked down, and beheld four great beasts, terrible only in their fierce brutality. Power is a dazzling object of ambition ; dominion has a fascinating attraction for men ; but the humblest saint of God can afford to look down on earthly glory, as from a lofty elevation, in the calm consciousness of undeniable and immea- surable superiority. Four great beasts : that was all the earth produced to the eye of the holy Daniel ! D 34 PROGRESSIVE REVELATION. The divinely selected symbols have an evident allusion to the two leading characteristics that have marked the four great Gentile empires, in contrast to the Jewish theocracy, and in still darker contrast to the coming kingdom of Christ. Image -.i'orship and inJiuman cruelty, idolatry and persecution, have been their characteristics. The image embodies the one thought, the wild beast the other. Nebuchadnezzar made an image, probably ^/ the image he had seen, and demanded for it world- wide worship, persecuting even to the fiery furnace, those who refused to bow down to it ; and Daniel experienced the wild beast character of the second great empire, when condemned to the lions' den for his piety toward God. That the four empires symbolised in this vision are the same four previously symbolised in the image can hardly be questioned. " The number is the same, four in each. The starting point is the same, for each was given while Babylon was the ruling power. The issue is the same, for both are immediately followed by the visible kingdom of Christ. The order is the same, for the kingdoms in the first vision, as all admit, are successive ; and in the other there are no less than seven or eight clauses which denote a succession in time. There is the same gradation, for the noblest metal and the noblest animal take the lead in each series. Further, the kingdoms in each vision are described as occupying the whole space, till the dominion of the saints of God . . . The first empire is that of Babylon, for to the king of Babylon it was said, 'thou art this head of gold.' If we require the names of the two next kingdoms, the angel Gabriel continues the message of the prophet : ' The ram having two horns are the kings of Media and Perslv . , . the rough goat is the king of Grecl\.' If we ask the name and character of the fourth empire the evan- gelist supplies the answer, ' there went out a decree from C/ESar Augustus that all the world should be taxed ' ; ' if we let Him alone, all men will believe on Him, and the Romans will come and take away both our place and nation.' Four supreme and ruling kingdoms, and four only, are announced by name in the PROGRESSIVE REVELATION. word of God, from the time of Daniel to the close of the sacred canon." * The raani difference is that the latter prophecy, like a tele- scope of higher power, presents an enlarged and more detailed view, especially of the fourth empire. The image showed that It had two distinct stages : one pure iron, unmixed and undi- vided ; the other iron and clay mixed, the metallic parts divided. In this fourth beast we discern a new clement, the dommion of the link horn ; and we thereby learn the moral reason for the judgment, which, in both visions alike, falls on the fourth em- pire in its last state. In connection with this last vision, the coming of Christ to judge is expressed in a clearer form, and the share which his people shall have in his reign. But the evidence it affords as to the relative period of the second advent, is in unison with that of the earlier vision. It places it at the end of the last phase of the fourth empire, and determines its immediate object to be the execution of judgment, and its ulti- mate object, the establishment on earth of the everlasting king- dom of the Most High, in which dominion shall be given to the saints. It thus announces that the coming of Christ, will be prior to his reign over the earth, in company with his saints , and it furnishes more accurate data also as to the actual period of the second advent. This latter however cannot be adduced in the present stage of our inquiry, since it is con- nected with two points of disputed interpretation, the considera- tion of which must be adjourned to the second part of this work. For the same reason the evidence of Daniel's last visions must here be presented but very mipcrfectly, and with- out any attempt to enter into detail. We observe merely that the very comprehensive, (and con- sequently complicated,) prophecy of the " things noted in the Scripture of truth " (Dan. xi.), announces one unbroken series of wars, revolutions, persecutions, apostasies, disasters, and de- solations, as occupying the whole scene of vision, until Daniel's *Eirk-,' " First Two Visions,"' p. 20. 36 PROGRESSIVE REVELATION. people should be delivered, and many of the dead arise (Dan. xii. 1-3). Now these two events, the deliverance of Israel from their great tribulation, and the resurrection of the just, are invariably associated in the prophecies with the personal coming of Christ (Zecli. xiv. 5 ; i Thess. iv., i Cor. xv.). Therefore, though Daniel does not mention a second advent of Christ, for reasons before alluded to, yet he marks its place in this series, by the position assigned to the events which synchronize with it. Thus a third time he places it, at the close of the four great empires, or of the times of the Gentiles, at the close of Israel's dispersion and tribulation, and prior to the commencement of that kingdom, in which "they that be wise shall shine as the brightness of the firmament, and they that turn many to righteousness, as the stars for ever and ever," — at the close of the fourth empire and before the millennial reign. The reign of Christ on earth is distinctly predicted in Zechariah xiv. 9, and many of its peculiar features are men- tioned in verses which follow. This is an orderly and de- tailed prophecy, of the events that shall usher in that reign ; and we have a definite statement, that foremost among those events, " the Lord viy God shall come, and all the saiiits with thee: . . . and the Lord shall be king over all the earth ; in that day there shall be one Lord, and his name one." In other words, we have in this prophecy a clear declaration that the advent \\\\\ precede the millennial reign. Again it is written " when the Lord shall build up Zion He shall appear in his glory." The building up of Zion, that is the restoration and conversion of Israel, must of course precede the millennial reign of Christ, over Israel and the earth, since it is inconceivable that Israel's dispersed and desolate condition, could continue during its course. A glorious epi- phany of the Son of God, is to accompany according to this prophecy, the building up of Zion, — a premillennial event. The second advent of Christ, therefore takes place before the millennium. The history of Israel is a typical history, prefiguring alike in PROGRESSIVE RE VELA TIOX. its broad outline and in its minor features the history of the church. What is the general outline of that history? Is it a gradual and steady progress from bad to good, and from good to better, culminating at last in something very good and glorious ? Nay, but the very reverse ! It is a downward progress, a succession of backslidings and apostasies, from the days of Solomon to the Babylonish captivity, and from the restoration to the fall of Jerusalem under Titus, and the final judgment and dispersion of the ancient people of God. Now there would be no analogy, but a most marked and marvellous contrast between the type and the antitype, if the history of the church were to be a gradual rise from the state of things we now have, into a millennial condition of blessedness, purity, and peace. It would do violence not only to the analogy -which exists between these two dispensations, but to the general moral analogy of all God's dispensations. Without exception hitherto every dispensation has ended in apostasy and judgment. Eden ended thus ; the antediluvian world ended thus ; the theocracy of Israel ended thus ; the kingdom of Israel ended thus ; the ministry of the prophets ended thus ; the ministry of Christ in person ended thus ; the ministry of the Spirit by the apostles ended thus, in the full and final rejection of Israel and in the giving of the kingdom of God to the Gentiles. So far the Gentile church has pursued a precisely similar course, and trodden the downward road of apostasy ; and can it be believed, that the last stage of her course is to aftbrd a total contras!: to all previous analogies, and culminate in a millennium of moral perfection and physical glory? No ! "when the Son of man Cometh shall He find faith on the earth " ? that is the question. When we turn to the pages of the New Testament the con- clusions to which these ancient prophecies have led us are in the fullest way confirmed. There are in the New Testament, apart from tiie Apocalypse, about a hundred passages, in which the second coming of Christ is more or less fully presented. About half of these afford no clear information on the subject we are considering, though 38 I'ROCRESSIVE REVELATION. indirect premillennial arguments might be drawn from most of them. About twenty passages teach- with various degrees of explicitness, that the coming of Christ will precede " the times of the restitution of all things " ; and there are four or five, which at first sight appear to favour an opposite view, but which on closer examination are found to harmonize with the rest. We will briefly review the leading passages of these two latter classes. The most cursory survey of them as a whole, however, suggests two iXxow^ prima facie arguments in favour of the pre- millennial view. It is a remarkable fact, that while in these scriptures, tlie return of the Lord Jesus is everywhere prominent, the truth of a millennium to come is scarcely asserted. It is assumed as an acknowledged hope in one or two places, and alluded to in a few others ; it is implied in some of our Lord's parables, but nowhere distinctly predicted, nowhere described, or presented as an object of hope. What is the natural in- ference ? That no millennium is to occur ? No ! but that something else is to occur before it ; and that the intervening event is the one, which the Holy Ghost would keep before the eye of the church, that intervening event being the glorious epiphany of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ. For, supposing for a moment that a thousand years of righteousness and rest, purity and peace, ^aere designed in the counsels of God, to succeed this age of sin and strife and suffering, before the oft promised return of the Lord Jesus, how unaccountable, how incredible that so little should be said about it ! Supposing it were to occur on the other hand after that return, and consequent upon it, how perfectly natural, that in prophecies designed to comfort and guide the church during the interval of Christ's absence, it should be scarcely mentioned. Its character had been described in the Old Testament, and was well imderstood by Jewish Christians and by the early church. They expected its commencement indeed, in con- nection with Christ's first coming : "wilt Thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel ?" and would never have entertained the thought, that it could occur during his absence. The PROGRESSIVE REVELATION. 39 events that should transpire during that absence, and the return that should introduce the kingdom, were therefore naturally the great subject matter of the prophecies of Christ and his apostles ; the subsequent millennial reign, taken as it were for granted, occupied a very subordinate place. The silence of the Lord Himself, and of the whole New Testament about the millennium, can be explained on no other supposition. The period of the millennial reign is long ; its character is glorious, its events gigantic, its sphere universal ; it will be no less than the subjugation of the entire world to Christ, the putting down of " all rule, and all authority and power,'" by the Son of God. If all this he to take place prior to his second coming, how impossible that He should overlook or omit it, in all his great prophetic descriptions of the entire course of the present dispensation. In Matthew xxiv. Christ describes his second personal advent and the great events which shall precede it. He reveals the course of this evil age, and its close. He foretells wars, famines, pestilences, earthquakes, persecutions, false prophets, iniquities, apostasies, the preaching of the gospel "as a wit- ness " to all nations, false signs and wonders, desolations, woes, including the great tribulation, and then He adds, " Im- mediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken ; and then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven, and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of ma?i coming in the clouds of heaven, ivitli power and great glory, and He shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other." That these words describe his personal advent in glory is certain, and equally certain is it, that this comprehensive pro- phecy, contains no allusion to a millennium of blessedness and peace. Can this be reconciled with the view that our Lord expected that golden age previous to his coming? The 40 PROGRESSIVE REVELATION. same thing may be said of the series of prophetic parables in Matthew xiii. They certainly describe his second personal advent, and as certainly portray the leading features of the age which shall end with that event ; but they speak of no millen' nium. They describe exactly what we see around us, exactly what we know has characterized the past eighteen hundred years, a partial spread of truth, a vast upgrowth of apostasy and corrup- tion in the professing church, a gathering out of the great sea of humanity a mingled mass of good and bad ; but no subju- gation of the entire world to Christ, no signs of righteousness from shore to shore. If any one asserts that the parable of the lea^lpi. foretells a universality of godliness in this dispensation, let him reflect, that in order to give his assertion any value he must ivcsX. prove that the "leaven " means good and not evil (a disputed point),* and secondly, that the " three measures of meal " means the entire human race, and not a defmite part of it : licit Jicr of which can he proved. This is a parable without an inspired interpretation ; men can do no more than surmise its meaning ; such surmises should accord, not clasJi, with clearer revelations, and with the Lord's own interpretation of the para- ble of the tares and the wheat. The same thing may be said of all the prophetic passages in the epistles of Paul : take for example that in the Second Epistle to the Thessalonians. He first describes the second coming of Christ with his mighty angels in flaming fire, to be glorified in his saints, and to take vengeance on the wicked. He then foretells the great antecedent to that comicg. What is it ? A millennium of righteousness? No ! a mystery of iniquity, the rise of the 5on of perdition, the manifestation of the man of sin, the fearful reign of Antichrist. Had he expected a long day of millennial light before Christ's return, how could he have foretold nothing, but a long night of spiritual darkness ? To Peter, Paul, Jude, and John, the future of this dispen- sation was overshadowed with portentous gloom. They gaze Indeed, it may be remaiked that in every other ph-re in Scripture where "leaven " is spoken of. it clcaily signifies evil. PROGRESSIVE REVELATION. 41 with sorrowing hearts into its dark depths; they warn the church ot approaching apostasy, and nerve it to meet coming persecution, encouraging it to hope for rehef from both, only at the coming of the Lord (2 Thess. i. 7). Had they foreseen the Christian dispensation gradually developing into universal brightness, how would the blessed prospect have chased their sorrow and lit their countenances with smiles of gladness ! But no ! their looks brighten only, as they turn from the present dispensation to its close, and catch a glimpse of the rising of the Sun of Righteousness, " looking for that blessed hope and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviou^^^s Christ." If then the apostles expected no millenniunV'^^rc the second advent of Christ, why should we ? The second argument suggested by a glance at the general tenour of these prophecies is stronger, for it is positive rather than negative. The Lord and his apostles not only do not foretell a millennium of blessedness before the second coming, but they do foretell a series of events which could not co- exist with such a millennium. They predict a succession of wars, famines, plagues, earthquakes, persecutions, apostasies, and corruptions, the working of a mystery of inicjuiiy, wliich culminates in the manifestation of the man of sin. Can these coexist with a millennium, whose characteristics are the absence of war, peace to the ends of the earth, universal jnosperily of the righteous, times of refreshing, the subjugation of all kings to the " King of kings," the putting down of all rule and authority and power, the subjugation of his enemies beneath his feet, the triumphant reign of his saints, the filling of the world with the knowledge of the Lord, as the waters cover the sea ? If the former series of events are to characterize the entire course of this dispensation, which is clearly the teaching of Scripture, the latter cannot ; they mutually exclude each other. There can therefore be no millennium before Christ comes. There are a number of passages in which tlie duty of constant watchfulness, is urged on the church. Take tliat in Luke xii. as a specimen. The Master bids us be like men tliat wait for 42 PROGRESSIVE REVELATION. their lord, pronounces a blessing on such as shall be found ''watching" speaks of the uncertainty as to the time of his coming, whether it should be in the second, or in the third watch, uses the illustration of the thief, and adds, "be ye there- fore ready also, for the Son of man comcth at an hour when ye think not." Now, though it may be difficult, to watch and wait for an event, the time of whose occurrence is altogether uncertain, and may be very distant, yet it is not impossible. But it is impos- sible to watch and wait for an event which we hioTU cannot ^during our lifetime, nor during that of our children, nor ly, many, subsequent generations. The millennium has not commenced yet ; we know it is to run a long course of a thousand years. If we know it is to precede our Master's return, how can we be, like men that wait for their Lord ? The thing is nnpossible, and Christ never commanded an impossibility; therefore we must expect the millennium after his coming and not before. The early church Avith one consent placed the mil- lennium revealed by St. John, after the advent, and felt it con- sequently no hindrance to their obedience to the Lord's com- mand, " be ye ready also." An interval nearly twice as long, has it is true actually elapsed, and was of course foreknown to our Lord. But it was not revealed, and though a portion of it is prophetically announced, it is announced in such symbolic language as to secure its not being understood, until the under- standing of it would be no hindrance to watchfulness. The Lord Jesus knew that fifty or sixty generations of men would live and die ere He would come again ; and He wished each one, to pass the time of its sojourning here, under the hallow- ing and cheering influence of " that blessed hope." He cannot consequently have revealed anything, that would justify the conclusion, "■ my Lord delayeth his coming." The thousand years of blessedness that He did reveal in the Apocalypse, through John, must consequently be subsequent to his return. The apostle Paul twice uses the expression "we who are alive and remain, unto the coming of the Lord " : whether we PROGRESSIVE REVELATION. 43 regard these words, simply as the natural utterance of his own feelings, or as dictated by the Holy Ghost, they bear equally strong testimony to the fact, that the coming of Christ, and not the millennium, is the event for which Christians should look and wait. Taken as the language of Paul merely, they show how thoroughly imbued he was with the expectation that the then living generation of saints, his own cotemporaries, might witness the second advent. Clearly he expected no millennium first, unless he also expected to live beyond the age of Methuselah ! And why after the lapse of eighteen hundred years, should we regard the coming of the Lor^'^s more distant from us, than he did from him ? Taking- the^ words as an inspired expression, placed by the Holy Ghost in the lips of each successive generation of Christians, they are still more conclusive. It is a Divine warrant to all, to expect M'hat Paul expected. The sorrowing mourners around each successive sleeper in Jesus, are to take up the glad strain, " ive who are alive and remain, shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air, and so shall we ever be with the Lord." The hope was never to lie in abeyance, never to be out of date ; but to be ever glowing, bright and warm, in living hearts. Therefore the Holy Ghost cannot have revealed a millennium, before the second coming of Christ; for such a revelation must render the hope of that coming dim and distant, and comparatively powerless, for the purposes of consolation to which it is here applied All the Christians that have yet lived, would have been unable to use the words of Paul; and since the millennium has not begun yet, thirty or forty generations more, must be equally incapable of adopting the language ; only those in fact who shall live in the tenth and last century of the millennium, could do so. Again the apostle Paul (Rom. viii. 18) uses two remarkable expressions, "the sufferings of this present time" and "the glory which shall be revealed in us." They respectively apply to tJiis dispcjisation, and to the millennial a^c. He sj^eaks of this present time as a period of suffering, not only to the sons of 44 PROGRESSIl'J:: REVELATION. God, but to the whole creation, which is under the bondage of corruption and subject to death. He speaks of that future age as a time of the manifestation of the sons of God, a time of " glorious liberty." He says that the whole creation groans and travails in pain together, and that we ourselves, in like manner groan within ourselves, while awaiting that period. He defines the point at which the transition from the one state to the other will take place, the point at which the millennium will com- mence, the point for which we wait. It is " the redemption of our BODY '"' that is the resurrection. But the resurrection will not, come till Christ comes, we know these two events syn- chropize even to the twinkling of an eye. Therefore the millen- 7mun loill not come till Christ comes, and Christ will come before the millcntiium. This conclusion can only be avoided by assert- ing, that during the millennium, the saints and the whole crea- tion will be groaning and travailing in pain together, and with " earnest expectation " awaiting a better state of things. In 2 Thessalonians ii. 8, in speaking of the destruction of the man of sin, the apostle declares that it will be effected by the brightness of Christ's coming, the inK^avi'ia t?]s Tt-apova-ias. Either therefore the man of sin, the great enemy of Christ, will live and reign throughout the millennium, which is incredible, or Christ will come before the millennium and destroy him. The loving words of our Lord, " Ye now tlierefore have sorrow, but 1 will see you again and your heart shall rejoice," though they may have found a fulfilment, in the joy that filled the disciples' hearts, when they saw the Lord after his resurrection, have yet a prophetic bearing on the effect of his future coming. They harmonize with all the scriptures which represent the church as an espoused bride awaiting an absent bridegroom, and teach us that for the church that loves her absent Lord, joy can come only with his return. Either then prolonged sorrow, deep unsatisfied yearnings of soul, a painful sense of loneliness and bereavement, are consistent with millennial bliss ; or else there can be no millennium for the church, till after the coming of Christ. PROGRESSIVE REVELATION. 45 The millennium will be a peculiar period, unlike any period that has as yet been known on carlh. If it were immediately to precede the coming of Christ, it would surely have been mentioned among the signs of that great event which we are exhorted to note. But it is never so mentioned ; // is nrccr mentioned at all in connection zuith an advent following it. In no one single passage of Scripture can the two events be found in this order ; nor can a single text be produced in which the second advent of Christ is spoken of, in connection 7i'ith a preceding millennium. We must therefore conclude that the millennium is \.o follow the coming of Christ.* ,.»^ Having thus reviewed some of the general tcachings%f Scripture, both in the Old and New Testaments, concerning the relative period of the second advent, we now turn to the final prophecy of the Bible, in the expectation of finding there, fuller and clearer light on the subject. The conclusion we have reached is abundantly confirmed by the general tenour of the Apocalypse, and by the direct evidence of its closing visions. This book presents the church as exposed to tribulation, and having need of patience, as bearing a painful and danger- ous testimony to Christ, and as enduring temptation and per- secution, right up to the time of the advent. Its author was in his own person, a representative of the church in these respects. " I John, who also am your brother, and companion in tribulation, and in the kingdom and patience of Jesus Christ, was in the isle that is called Patmos, for the word of God, and for the testimony of Jesus Christ." Never in the whole course of the book do we see the saints exalted and reigning, until after the second advent. The sweet picture of heavenly glory in chap, vii., occurs in unbroken sequence after a succession ot war, famines, plagues, martyr deaths, and political convulsions. No period of holiness and peace on earth is mentioned as inter- vening. The seven trumpets announce an uninterrupted series of judgments, up to the moment when it is said "the kingdoms * The order of the visions in Rev. x.\. is no exception to t'.iis rule, as shown in the following pages. 46 J'KOGRESSIVE REVELATION. of this world are become the kingdom of our Lord and of his Christ, and He shall reign for ever and ever" (xi. 15). The trumpets clearly represent, not millennial blessings, but pro- vidential judgment ; they leave no room for a millennium before the coming of Christ. But any remains of doubt ought to be dispelled by the closing visions of this book. There, bright, clear, full, and harmonious -with every previous pre- diction, stands out on almost the last page of inspiration, a grand and detailed description of the epiphany of Christ. It is a symbolic description it is true, for the revelation in which it occurs is a symbolic prophecy , but its symbols, inter- preted by other scriptures, can hardly be mistaken ; they serve rather as the steps of a ladder, to enable the mind to mount to the majesty of the theme. And there too, immedi- ately succeeding it, stands out a second prophecy of the REIGN of Christ and his saints, symbolic too, yet simple in its symbolism, and Avith even its simple symbols explained to make them simpler. As we look into these last unveilings of the counsel of God about the future, once more we ask the question, what is the prospect before us ? A thousand years of bliss on earth, and then our Lord from heaven ? or our Lord from heaven first, and then a thousand years of bliss ? We re- member as we await the reply, that it is the last testimony we can have, till the event itself give an answer, the last prophetic utterance of the Holy Ghost on the subject. The Vision of the Advent of the King of Kings. And I saw heaven opened, And behold a white horse ; He that sat on him was called Faithful and True : In righteousness He doth judge and make war : His eyes were as a flame of fire ; On his head were many crowns : He had a name written that no man knew but He Himself) He was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood ; His name was called the Word of God. PROGRESSIVE REVELATION. 47 And the armies which were in heaven followed Him, Upon white horses ; Clothed in fine linen white and clean ; Out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword ; That with it He should smite the nations ; And He shall rule them with a rod of iron. He treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God, He hath on his vesture and on his thigh, a name written, King of Kings and Lord of Lords. Rev. xix. Every clause of this magnificent vision, determines the rider on the white horse to be Jesus Christ and none other. Heaven was opened to give Him exit; a door in heaven had been previously opened for John to gaze on its hidden mysteries ; now heaven itself opens, and its armies follow their great Captain. He bears a fourfold name ; He is called Faithfuf and True; who can He be but "Jesus Christ the faithful and true witness"? He has also a name thai no man kno7C's but He Himself; who can He be but the Son, whom "no man knoweth but the Father," the one, who of old said to Manoah, " Why askest thou thus after my name, seeing it is secret?" His name is called "the Word of God" ; who can He be but He who in the beginning was with God and was God ? And on his vesture and on his thigh, are emblazoned the unmistakable words, '' King of kings and Lord of lords." He comes to do a threefold work, each part of whicli be- longs to Christ and to Christ alone, as other scriptures abund- antly prove. "/« righteousness He doth Judge and make war " against the Beast and his armies (ver. 20). Who can He be but the Lord who shall consume that wicked son of perdition and man of sin, with the spirit of his mouth and the brightness of his coming? (i Thess. ii. 8.) " He shall rule the nations iviih a rod of iron.''' Who can He be but the only begotten Son of God, to whom are addressed 4S PROGRESSIVl: REVELATION. tlie words of the second Psalm, " ask of Me and I shall give Thee the heathen for thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession. Thou shalt break them with a rod of iron " ? ^^ He treaddh the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God." Who can He be, but the glorious One, mighty to save, who says " I will tread down the people in mine anger," and " trample them in my fury " (Isa. Ixiii.) ? His vesture dipped in blood identifies Him with this red-apparelled Con- queror and solitary Saviour. " His eyes are as a flame of fire," as were the eyes of the one like unto the Son of man, seen by John in the first vision of this book. Who can He be but that God who is of purer eyes than to behold evil, and cannot look on iniquity? that God who searches the heart and tries the reins, and from whom no secrets are hid ? " On his head were many crowns^'' for " domi- nion and glory and a kingdom are given Him, that all nations and languages should serve Him." Who can He be but that Son of man who is also the Ancient of days, Israel's long looked for Messiah, earth's oft desired King, the King of righteousness, the King of Salem, which is the King of peace? On his head were many diadems : the royal crown, the victor's crown, the priestly crown, the nuptial crown, all befit his blessed brow; and on it rest the many diadems which recently adorned the bestial horns, united now on the head of Him who has van- quished them all. Who can He be but the One to whom every knee shall bow, and every tongue confess, the One who has received a name above every name ? He is followed, not by angelic hosts, but by the saintly armies of heaven ; who can He be but the one, of whom Enoch prophesied, " the Lord cometh, with ten thousands of his saints " ; the one of whom Zechariah wrote, " The Lord my God shall come, and all the saints with thee " ; the One who shall be glorified in his saints, and admired in all them that believe, in that day ? And this vision can be a vision of nothing else but di persona! advent of Christ. It cannot be a vision of a spiritual coming. PROGRESSIVE REVELATION. 49 ' every clause forbids the thought. For such a coming, it needs not that heaven should be opened ; for such a coming it needs not attendant armies of saintly warriors. The coming of the Lord zvith ten thousa?ids of his saints has been regarded even from antediluvian ages, as his personal appearance to execute judgment on the ungodly. It cannot be a vision of a providential coming; the previous chapters of this book, afford illustrations of the kind of Divine interference in the affairs of earth, which is intended by this expression. In the opening of the seven-sealed book, in the scattering of the coals of fire on the earth, in the sound- ing of the seven trumpets, Christ is seen acting provi- dentially. But He is seen in heaven; thence He directs his various angelic and other agencies, for his providence needs not his personal presence on earth. "The heavens do rule " in providence on behalf o^ iht saints, not /;/ conjunction with them, whether man perceive it or not. If this vision represent merely a providential coming, to what end the opened heaven, and the forth issuing armies, following the King of kings ? No- where is it promised or prophesied, that the saints shall share with Christ his present providential government ; but it is promised that they shall share his future work of judging and ruling the world. But further ; if it were a figurative, spiritual, or providential coming that is here represented, its character antl its objects must needs be in harmony with those of all the spiritual and providential comings with which we are acquainted. In other words, if the coming here prefigured be an event belonging in any sense to this dispensation, it should harmonize with the known actions and operations of Christ during this dispen- sation. It does not do this ; it is on the contrary in abrupt and violent contrast to them. The line of action here ascribed to the Lord Jesus, and the line of action which we know Him to have been pursuing ever since incarnation, are so antago- nistic, as to preclude their characterizing one and the same .dispensation. In the vision, " in righteousness He doth judge ; " 50 PROGRESSIVE REVELATION. in Ihis age, in grace He refuses to judge, saying "I came not to judge " ; " man, who made INIe a judge over you ? " "I judge no man "; "neither do I condemn thee." In tlie vision, in right- eousness He makes war ; in this age, in grace He makes peace : He came to bring peace on earth, " He is our peace," " He is the Prince of peace." In the vision, " out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it He should smite the nations " ; in this dispensation we are not smitten, but renewed by the word of God, which liveth and abideth for ever ; the gospel does not smite the nations but quickens and blesses them. In the vision, "He ruleth the nations with a rod of iron"; in this age Christ does not ostensibly " rule the nations " at all, for Satan is the God of this world; but if He did. He would rule them in grace and by love, even as He rules his church, and not by the iron rod, of inflexible righteousness ; He spares the nations, He is kind to the unthankful and unworthy, his longsufifering is salvation. In the vision, " He treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God," that is, He executes the holy indignation of God agairLst sinners. In this dispensation. He manifests the love of God to a guilty world, He receives gifts even for the rebellious, He beseeches sinners to be reconciled to God. \\\\o would ever think of describing Christ's present actions in the words of this vision ? The coming here prefigured, can- not then be an event of this age at all, it is the inauguration of a future age. But it is argued this vision cannot prefigure a literal per- sonal advent, its symbolic language proves that a figurative one only is intended. This is virtually to assert that a prophecy of the second advent of Christ is impossible in the Apocalypse ; for it is throughout a book of symbols, it is written in the language of symbols, if it contain a prophetic vision of the second advent, it must therefore be expected to be a symbolic vision. Now seeing the second advent is the one chmax to which cvery'diing in the book tends, can we suppose, that there exists in it no description of the great event PR GRESSIVE RE VEL A TIO.Y. itself? Impossible! This then must be it, for there is no other. There is nothing in the nature of symbolic language to preclude its being used in describing literal events. The lan- guage of symbols is in this respect, on a par with any other language. The Egyptian hieroglyphics formed a symbolic language, but are the events of Egyptian history narrated and preserved in that language therefore figurative? on the con- trary, plain, substantial, literal, history is recorded in those hiero- glyphics, and plain, substantial, literal, events may in like manner be predicted in hieroglyphic or symbolic prophecy. Now a literal personal advent could not be predicted more clearly in the language of symbols than it is here. Besides which, the judgment scene immediately succeeding, requires this vision to be a real personal advent. Scripture is ever harmonious with itself, elsewhere we find the work of judgment is committed by the Father to the Son, and that the Son executes it personally, not by proxy ; He does not dele- gate the task to others, though He employs the assistance of saints and angels. The husbandman who sowed the seed, comes himself to put in the sickle, when the harvest is ripe ; the lord of the vineyard comes himself to tread the wine- press ; so here. In former parts of the Apocalypse angels had been extensively employed. But now the Lord of hosts pre- pares Himself for the final battle, and comes personally to in- augurate by the judgment of the living, — the destruction of the antichristian hosts, — that great day of judgment, and day of the Lord, which lasts a thousand years, and ends with the final assize of the great white throne. In short, a personal advent of Christ, is the theme, the main theme, of the whole Bible. The past advent did not accom- plish the full results predicted ; since // became history, a second advent has been the dominant note in every prophetic strain, and in the Apocalypse it becomes more prominent than ever. From the "behold He cometh with clouds" of the first chapter, to the "behold I come (|uickly " of the last, tliis theme 52 PROGRESSIVE REVELATION. prevades the book. The Apocalypse is a grand drama, the epiphany is its dimax. " Hold fast till I come," is Christ's own word to Smyrna; "behold I come quickly," his encourage- ment to Philadelphia ; the redeemed in heaven, rejoice in the prospect, " we shall reign on the earth." On the sound- ing "of the seventh trumpet, the elders fall down in worship before God, because the moment is at last come, when He is to take his great power and reign on earth. Under the sixth vial the Lord repeats the warning note, " behold I come as a thief" ; and the Apocalypse, yea the Bible itself, ends with the same promise, " surely I come quickly." " Now the present vision is the passage, and the only passage, where such a glorious advent of our Lord is distinctly de- scribed. Till then He is seen in spirit, as the Lamb in the heavenly places, as the priest at the heavenly altar, as the mighty angel, the mysterious messenger of the covenant, while the hour of mystery still continues, and still repeats the warn- ing 'behold I come.' Here in the vision heaven is opened, and He is seen to come, in manifest glory as the Word of God. After this He is spoken of as already come. In the very scene where the powers of evil have just been overthrown, and from which Satan has just been banished, his people 'reign v.'ith Christ a thousand years.' When the white throne is seen, He is seen already present to occupy it ; and not a word is "•iven to indicate a fresh arrival, of Him who sits to execute the judgment. All converges on the advent before this vision, all centres on a personal advent of the Word in the vision it- self, all implies a previous advent in the visions which follow. And hence the internal evidence that the real advent is here described, is complete."* Now this vision which presents Christ and his saints coming forth to judge and to reign is followed by others which present the judgment and the reign ; i.e., the destruction of the hosts of Antichrist, and the millen- nial reign of the risen saints with their Lord. We have there- • " Outlines of Unfulfilled Prophecy,' Birks, p. 83. PROGRESSIVE REVELATION. 53 fore in the last prophecy on the subject, the clearest proof that the second coming of the Lord is to be premillennial. "Will any one assert that a millennium, unnoticed and vndcscrihed in the Apocalypse, has preceded this advent vision ? ^^'hat ! the glorious times of restitution of all things, passed over in silence, as unworthy of a place in the great chart of the future ? Impossible ! and even granting it possible, whereabouts could we insert a millennium, in the long list of evil event and sore judgments of which the book consists? and even if any one find room for it, and satisfy himself by conceiving it may come in here or there, what then will he do with the millennium that is noticed and described after this advent vision? Are there to be two millennia? Docs the word of God sanction such a thought? Are we to have a spiritual millennium preceded by a spiritual coming, and then a literal millennium preceded by a literal coming ? To ask the ques- tion is to answer it ! The whole Bible forbids the notion of a third advent and second millennium ! The only other alternative, is to deny that this is a vision of a personal advent of Christ at all. But then ivJiat is it? It cannot, as we have seen, be a figurative coming. JV/iat caji it be? Does it describe nothing at all? Is the most magnifi- cent vision in the book destitute of signification ? Is it con- ceivable, that the greatest event in the future history of our world is not made the subject of a vision in the Apocalypse at all ? Where else can we find it ? Nowhere ! Christ acts on earth afterwards, He does not come to earth. This then is the ADVENT VISION, or — there is none ! And why should we doubt that this is its character ? Does it clash with any previously revealed truth ? Nay, but it harmonizes most sweetly with all ! He is to come after the resurrection, for He brings the risen saints with him. Here the marriage of the Lamb, that perfect union of Christ and his people, which cannot take place prior to resurrection, immediately precedes this advent vision. He is to come to destroy Antichrist and to take vengeance on those that know not God and obey not the gospel. Here this 54 PROCRESSJVE REVELATION. destruction of Antichrist and the kings of the earth and their armies, immediately follows this advent vision. Suppose for a moment, that the place occupied by it were left a blank, that the prophecy passed at once, from the mar- riage of the Lamb, to the destruction of the antichristian host. OtJia- scriptures would force us to place the second coining of Christ between those two scenes. The destruction of the beast and the folse prophet, demand a previous epiphany, ac- cording to 2 Thessalonians ii. ; and the rapturous marriage of the Lamb in heaven, the meeting in the air of Christ and his saints, requires a subsequent manifestation, according to 2 Thessalonians i. lo. When therefore we find a vision, symbolising in the most consistent and magnificent way, a personal advent of Christ, just where we might have expected to find it, just where all prophecy would conspire to fix its place, just where its ab- sence would render it impossible to harmonize multitudes of other predictions ; when we find it written large in letters of light, and stamped with a sublimity of symbol and circumstance worthy of such an event, and too grand for any other, we bow to this final testimony of the prophetic word, and admit that Scripture leaves no room to doubt, that the Lord Jesus will come again in ])erson. to this earth, before the millennium, in other words, that the second advent will be premillennial. CHAPTER III. PROGRESSIVE REVELATIONS AS TO THE MILLENNIUM, THE RESURRECTION, AND THE JUDGMENT. 'E turn now to consider the teachings of the Apocalypse as to the events to succeed the second advent of Christ, and it is here that the appHcation of the principle of progressive revelation becomes of peculiar importance. That principle requires, as we have seen, that we receive the teachings of this inspired prophecy on its authority alone, when they are unconfirmed by other Scripture ; and it requires also that we be prepared to modify impressions derived from earlier and more elementary predictions, whenever this latest revelation of the future demands it. No author expects to have the latest and fullest edition of his book corrected by an earlier and less explicit one; no author but would wish on the contrary that early editions should be read in the light of the last. The Apocalypse contains undoubtedly, the last and the fullest reve- lation of God on these subjects, the final expression of his purpose ; prior statements must be conformed to this, and not this to prior statements. The advent vision is followed by a vision of the judgment on Antichrist and his associates, and immediately after this we have The Vision of the Millennium. And I saw an angel come down from heaven, Having the key of the bottomless pit, and a great chain in his hand ; And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil and Satan, 56 PROGRESSIVE REVELATION. And bound him a thousand years, and cast him into the bot- tomless pit, And shut him up, and set a seal upon him, That he should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years be fulfilled, And after that he must be loosed for a little season. And I saw thrones, and they sat on them ; And judgment was given unto them ; And I saw the souls of them that were beheaded. For the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God ; Who had not worshipped the beast, nor his image ; Neitlier had received his mark in their foreheads, or in their hands ; And tiiev lived and reigned with Christ a thousand YEARS. But the rest of the dead lived not again, Until the thousand years were finished ; This is the first resurrection. Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection ; On such the second death hath no power. But they shall be priests of God and of Christ, And shall reign with Him a thousand years. The twentieth chapter of Revelation, as is evident to every student of Scripture, contains several new predictions peculiar to itself The broad fact that there is to be a reign of Christ and his saints on earth is not new. Though little is said about it in the gospels and the epistles, for the reason previously assigned that they occupy themselves rather with the previous advent, yet the law, the psalms, and the prophets, teem with predic- tions of this irign of Christ. But that it should be introduced by a binding of Satan, that it should last a thousand years, these facts, dimly intimated elsewhere, are revealed \\t\Q.for tJic first and only time. PRO.GRESSIl'E REVELATION. 57 Are we therefore to stand in doubt about them, or try to ex- plain the revelation in some non-natural sense ? God forbid ! The God who cannot lie, inspired this single prediction of them; is not that enough? We need not hesitate to believe what God says, even if He say it only once ; and indeed we might reject most of the revelations of the Apocalypse, if we adopt the maxim, of doubting all that is only once predicted. Not only does this prophecy require us to believe two nac revelations, but it also necessitates a modification of previously entertained views, on two familiar and all important points of our creed, the resurrection of the dead and the judg- ment TO COME. It reveals, what had never previously been clearly made known, that both are to be accomplished in two successive stages, with a thousand years between tliem, and not in one great act, as, but for this chapter, we might have supposed. Are we then to distort the declarations of this chapter, in order to bring them into harmon}', not with previous predic- tions, but with the impressions we have derived from pre- vious predictions ? No ! but we must bring our impressions into harmony with the joint teaching of earlier and later reve- lations, which, seeing both are Divine, cannot be contradictory. No one would dream of doing otherwise, in the case of an earlier and later communication from some superior authority. Say, for instance, that the Admiralty issue a notice, that a cer- tain squadron is to sail next month for the IMediterranean. After a few weeks a subsequent order provides, that three ves- sels are to leave on the ist of the month, for Besika Bay; and three more on the 30th, for IMalta. Shall the commanders hesitate about giving credence to the later sailing orders, be- cause they had received from the earlier notice an impression that all the ships were to start simultaneously, and for one and the same destination ? Clearly not ! There is no discrepancy or inconsistency in the orders ; the difference is simply, that the later directions are more ample and detailed than were the earlier. From the earlier, the commanders received the 58 PROGRESSIVE REVELATION. erroneous impression they entertained; an impression they would of course abandon immediately the second order arrived. But as regards these later visions of the Apocalypse, too many act in an opposite way. *' We thought," they say, " that Scripture foretold one sim.ultaneous resurrection of all mankind, to take place at the end of the world, and to be immediately followed by the general judgment, the final separation of the righteous and the wicked, and the eternal state. What ? two resurrections? two judgments? and a thousand years apart? What ? Christ and his risen- saints, reigning over mortal men on the earth, for an entire age, while the rest of the dead lie in their graves ? Impossible ! The Bible never says so anywhere else ! And Satan to be imprisoned for a thousand years, before he is cast into the lake of fire ? This cannot be, we never gathered this from any other part of Scripture ! Either these visions do not teach such heterodox novelties, or they are not inspired ! True, they say this, but they must j?iean something else, for such doctrines are quite contrary to our creed, alto- gether at variance with the impressions we have derived from previous revelations on the subject." Such reasoning is not true wisdom, it is prejudice, and it is a denial of God's right to m:xke p7'ogrcssive 7-evclations. Wisdom, while perceiving clearly the discrepancy, would say ; " Con- trary as these new revelations are to the impressions derived from previous scriptures, let us see if any real variance exist, and if not, let us abandon our imperfect and consequently erroneous ideas, and receive with meekness, all the light on these subjects graciously granted by God." We propose therefore first to examine what the peculiar teachings of these visions arc, and secondly whether these teachings, taken in their most obvious and natural sense, are indmsistcnt with other scriptures, or merely iii advance of them. Let it be noted then, first, that this is not a vision of the resuiTCCtion of saints, but of their enthronement and reign. As far as they are concerned, the resurrection is past already be- fore this scene opens. PROGRESSIVE REVELATION. 59 Other scriptures definitely fix the moment of the resurrection of saints. " They that are Christ's " rise at his coining; his saints meet their Lord in the air, and come with Him to the earth (Col. iii. 3, i Thess. iv.). The resurrection must there- fore have taken place before Xha advent described in the previous vision. What was the immediately preceding act in this Divine drama ? Multitudinous voices in heaven, are heard asserting, that Christ has assumed his kingly power, and that the marriage of the Lamb is come. Now this marriage, celebrated by the glad hallelujahs of heaven, can be nothing else than that full union of Christ and his church which is to take place at the resur- rection. The angelic host describe the bride, as made "ready," as arrayed in fine linen clean and white which is the righteous- ness of saints, and John is instructed to write down " blessed ' those who are called to the marriage supper. Now not till after resurrection, can Christ present his church to Himself "a glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing, but holy and without blemish," according to this scene : rcs2i7-- rection must therefore have preceded this vision of the marriage sitppcr. No vision of it is given in the Apocalypse ; how could there be ? It is the event of less than a moment, it occupies only the twinkling of an eye. It could not be represented as an occurrence on earth, for the risen saints are, in a second, caught up to meet their Lord in the air ; nor as an occurrence in heaven, for it is connected with the earth and the air. The precise locality of the nuptial feast is not indicated, a veil of privacy is thrown around the meeting of bridegroom and bride; it takes place, and this is all that we know. Whether any in- terval elapse between the resurrection rapture and the glorious epiphany, is not revealed to us here. But the epiphany has occurred; and the church, under the symbol of the armies that were in heaven, has shared in the work of judging the antichristian hosts, before this millennial vision opens. In it, con- sequently, we have not the resurrection, but the enthronement, of the risen saints. The expression " this is the first resurrec- 6o PKOGRESSIVE REVELATION. tion" is not a note of time, but of character: it is tantamount to, this is the company who rise in the first resurrection, 7wt this is the chronological point at which the first resurrection takes place ; and the company here spoken of, like those called to the marriage supper, are declared blessed ajid holy. There is similarly no vision of the second stage of the resurrection in verse 1 2 ; tlie dead are presented as already raised, and standing before God. But though these verses give no vision of either the first or the second stage of the resurrection, tlicy give much new light about it ; they distinctly reveal, that there is naxr to take place, a sinmltancous resurrec- tion of all mankind, but that on the contrary, the distinction so marked in this life, between the godly and the ungodly, is to be more marked still in the resurrection. It shows us that the righteous shall rise before the wicked; rise to live and reign for a thousand years with their risen royal Lord ; and that the "rest of the dead " rise not again till the thousand years be fulfilled. "And I saw thrones, and they sat on them, and judgment was given unto them." To whom ? To Christ and his risen saints, to the King of kings, and to the armies which were in heaven; for we must go back to the 13th verse of chapter xix. for the occupants of these thrones. There intervenes no plural or collective noun, for which this pronoun they could stand. We may therefore paraphrase the words thus : " I saw Christ and his risen saints enthroned and governing the world." John noticed especially among the latter, the martyrs and confessors who had figured so prominently in previous stages of this long drama ; their cries, and groans, and suffer- ings, and blood, had been main features of its different stages, and they are therefore singled out from among their brethren for a special mention, which marks the unity of this scene with the whole Apocalypse. In this final righting of the wrongs of ages, the sufterers are enthroned beside the great Sufferer, the overcomers sit with Him in his throne, the faitliful witnesses of Christ, reign with their I..ord, the oppressed and slaughtered PROGRESSIVE REVELATION. 6i saints, judge the world. But this mention of a special class is by the way : the main stream of the prophecy continues thus : " I saw thrones, and they sat on them, and judgment was given unto them, and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years; but the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection." Subsequently, the " rest of the dead " are seen standing in the last assize, before the great white throne, to be judged. " I saw the dead small and great stand before God." The dead are thus divided into two portions ; there are the dead who rise and reign, and the dead who rise not and reign not with them. There are the dead who rise to judge the world with Christ, and there are the dead who rise to be judged according to their works by God. There are the dead who rise to sit on thrones, and the dead who rise to stand before the great white throne. There are the dead who rise with spiritual bodies; how else could they last a thousand years ? and the dead who rise as they died, to die a second death. There are the dead who rise emphatically "blessed and holy," and the dead who rise only to be tried, condemned, and cast into hell. There are the dead who rise immortal, for on them the second death hath no power, and the dead who rise only to become its victims. Throughout, these two classes are presented in marked and intentional contrast ; the latter are beyond all question literal dead, so therefore are the former. This passage then teaches that the resurrection of die dead will take place in two stages, with a thousand years between. Taken in its apparent, most natural, and consistent meaning, nothing else can be made of it. Why then has it been made the victim of more distortion than almost any passage in the Bible ? And why, after the ablest champions of the truth, have in unanswerable argument, defended its right to mean what it seems to mean, why to this day, do multitudes still read it with the coloured spectacles of preconceived opinion, so as to change its clear blue of heavenly doctrine, into tlie muddy 62 PROGRESSIVE REVELATION grey of mystical unmeaningness ? Why will multitudes still derange its majestic harmonies, so as to produce ungrateful discord ? why make of this graciously given clue to the laby- rinth of previous prophecy, a snare to entangle our feet the further, in a maze of doubt and difficulty ? Let an intelligent cliild, or any one who simply understands the terms used, read these verses attentively, and then answer the question, " will the dead all rise at the same time?" We will venture to assert they would unhesitatingly answer : " No ! this passage declares the contrary, the righteous will rise a thousand years before the wicked." Such is the obvious meaning of the prophecy, and the more closely it is analysed, the more clearly is it perceived to teach this doctrine. The difficulty arises from the mistaken attempt to put new wine into old bottles, to reduce the fulness of a last revelation to the dimensions of a more elementary one. Let us reverse the process, and applying the principle of pro- gressive revelation, let us see whether every previous prophecy on the subject of resurrection, may not without any distortion at all of the text, be harmonized with this latest prophecy. There is but little in the Old Testament on the subject of resurrection, for it was Christ who brought life and immor- tality to light \ but, though revealed only dimly in the olden time, they tvcre revealed. Isaiah wrote : " Thy dead men shall live, . . . my dead body, they shall arise ; awake and sing, ye that dwell in dust." Can this allude to a resuirection of others than saints? Shall "the dead, small and great," sing before the great white throne ? But, to pass by other less clear statements of the doctrine of resurrection in the Old Testament, we find in Daniel xii. a passage more quoted than almost any other, in support of the idea that the resurrection of the righteous and of the wicked will be at one and the same moment. " ]\Liny of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt." The time of this resurrection ij fixed in the previous verse to be the time of the deliverance PROGRESSIVE REVELATION. 63 of Daniel's people from their great tribulation, that is, the time of Israel's restoration, Antichrist's destruction, and the second advent. It seems to require some ingenuity to make out a contradic- tion between this prophecy and that of John. It places resur- rection at the same /^/V// in the great chart of the future; it makes the same moral distinction, and in the same order, as our Lord in John v., and it omits in the same way all allu- sion to a chronological interval. It neither specifies nor ex- cludes one, as was natural in a prediction so brief and ele- mentary, of an event at that time so distant. The apparent discrepancy is clearly caused by difcct of detail in this early prophecy ; and we have only to add to its statement, the new particulars given in the later revelation, to produce perfect harmony. Some expositors, however, render the original of this verse differently from our authorized version ; translating it " the many," or " the multitude of," which is equivalent to all. Others consider that it will not bear this version, but rather that the two classes contrasted in the latter part of the pro- phecy refer to the many who rise, and to the '' ccst of the dead," whose resurrection is not here mentioned, but who are destined to shame and everlasting contempt.'- Whichever view may be the true one, neither, it is evident, presents any im- portant variation from the Apocalypse ; the two predictions harmonize as far as the first goes. No contradiction can be alleged between them ; we must not wonder that we do not find in the pages of Daniel, that which we cannot discover even in the gospels, a doctrine that it was reserved for the final prophecy of Scripture, to reveal. The passage of Scripture whicli more fully tlian any other * " I do not doubt that the ri,q;ht translation of tliis verse i^, — ' ami many from amoncj the slcej^ers of the dust ot tlie earth shall awake, tliese shall lie unto everlasting life, but lhoi;e (the rest of tlie sleepers who do not awake at this time) shall be unto shame and cverkistiiii; contempt.' " — 'rrcgellcb on Daniel, p. 102. 64 PROGRESSIVE REVELATION. dwells on the subject oi the resurreciion, the passage which has illumined the darkness of death to successive generations of Christians, and like the bow in the cloud, thrown a gleam of glory over ten tliousand graves, is the fifteenth chapter of the First Epistle to the Corinthians. To the sound of its majestic and marvellous strains, we commit to the dust, those whom we bury in sure and certain hope of a glorious resurrection. But why does an intelligent and conscientious Christian, shrink from sounding over the grave of the ungodly those triumphant and heart cheering strains ? Because that chapter treats exclusively of the 7rsurrcctio?i of those that are Christ's at his coiniiii::;! There is no assertion here of a simultaneous rising of all mankind ! In vain we search for any allusion at all to a resurrection of the 7oickcd. " It is sown in corruption, it is raised in incorruption ; it is sown in dishonour, it is raised in glory ; it is sown in weakness, it is raised in power ! " Believers only can be included in the state- ment. " We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed ; in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump ; for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised, incorruptible, and we shall be changed ; for this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immor- tality " ; that death may be swallowed up in victory, and we obtain the victory, through our Lord Jesus Christ. There is nothing here at variance with the vision we have just con- sidered ; on the contrary, there are two distinct harmonics with its teachings. 1. The resurrection of those tliat are Christ's is spoken of as a distinct event. " Christ the firstfruits, afterward they that are Christ's" (not "afterward all mankind"). 2. This resurrection is said to be, not at the end of the world, but "v veKp^p, "from amo7i^ " the dead, the first resurrection, in which only the blessed and holy have part. In the same way our Lord spoke of being "recompensed at the resurrection of the just ; could He have used such language if there were no distinction between the resurrection of the just and that of the unjust ? In John V. 28, 29, our Lord says, " the hour is coming, in which all that are in the graves, shall hear his voice, and shall come forth ; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life, and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of judgment." It must be admitted that if we were obliged to take the word " /lour " here in its most limited sense, this passage would un- doubtedly teach, a simultaneous resurrection of all the dead. But we are not. The word aipa admits of wide extension, its primary meaning is " season," and our Lord Himself, in a sen- tence immediately preceding this, employs it to cover the whole of this gospel dispensation, in which the spiritually dead are being quickened to life by his voice. If it admit of extension to eighteen hundred years in the twenty-fifth verse, it may well include a thousand in the twenty-eighth, and this is all that is requisite, to make it agree perfecdy, with the apocalyptic vision. This grand and solemn prediction of our Lord announces that mOiXilly there will be two resurrections, first of the just, and secondly of the unjust ; the twentieth chapter of Revelation adds, that chronologically also there will be two, first of the just, and secondly of the unjust. There is no discord here, but there is on the contrary a marked harmony. There is a parallelism also between the spiritual resur- icctions that are going on in this "hour," and the bodily resurrections that shall occur in that " hour." Neither are simultaneous ; though the latter according to the Apoca- lypse, take place only at two epochs, at the beginning, and at the close, of the millennium ; while the former are, as PROGRESSIVE REVELATION. 67 experience teaches, still less simultaneous, and take place day by day, throughout the whole course of the dispensa- tion. Would our Lord have used the two striking, distinct, names He does use, had He foreseen one general resurrection ? Would He have spoken of " the resurrection of life " and " the resurrection of damnation " ? These are the main passages in the Bible bearing on the doctrine of resurrection. We now inquire, where does Scrii> ture teach a simultaneous resurrection of all mankind ? And echo answers, where ? Yet many have so strong an im- pression that it is a fundamental doctrine of the Christian faith, that they feel bound to evade in some way, the simple obvious conclusions to be drawn from the visions we arc con- sidering. So far from being at variance with previous inspired teachings on the subject, the fresh revelations of the Apocalypse enable us to perceive the Divine accuracy of many delicate touches in earlier scriptures, which would have remained unperceived but for our knowledge of this truth. Such, for instance, is the discriminating use of the four Greek expressions, rendered in- differently in our version "the resurrection of the dead." Moses Stuart says: "after investigating this subject, I have doubts Avhether the assertion is correct that such a doctrine as that of the first resurrection, is nowhere else to be found in Scripture. The laws of philology oblige me to suppose, that the Saviour and St. Paul have both alluded to such a doctrine." The Greek expressions used may be literally translated " resur- rection of dead ones," "resurrection from among dead ones," "the resurrection : that one from among dead ones," and " the out resurrection of or from the dead." The Greek expressions are not used indiscriminately ; and it is evident that, had they been uniformly translated by exactly corresponding phrases, the thought of a resurrection of some of the dead, and not of all the dead, would have been a familiar one to students of Scripture. The phraseology employed on tlic subject is, in other words, precisely what would naturally be scleclcd by the PROGRESSIVE RE VELA TION. Holy Spirit, if resurrection were foreseen to consist of two stages ; but unaccountable, if it were all to consist in one act.* It should be remembered also that a resurrection of some, which leaves others behind, is the only kind of resurrection of which we have any example. Such were the three resurrec- tions miraculously wrought by our Lord ; such was his own resurrection, and such was the rising which took place, when " many bodies of the saints which slept arose, and came out of the graves, after his resurrection, and appeared unto many." Why should not that which has happened on a small scale happen on a large ? The Final Judgment. The commonly received opinion on this subject, that the whole race ot man will appear simultaneously before the great white throne of God, to be judged according to their works, at the coming of the Lord, is based upon a great many passages of Scripture, and is tenaciously held, with a conviction that any departure from it is grave heresy. But this twentieth chapter of Revelation, taken in its context and in its natural sense, requires a modification of this theory. It does not deny that the whole human family will appear before the judgment seat and throne of God ; but it teaches that they will not do so simultaneously, that the act of judgment, like that of resurrec- tion, will take place in two stages, divided by an interval of a thousand years. * The expression " out of " or " from " the dead is never used in the New Testament except of a resurrection in which others are left behind; it is used thirty-five times of the resurrection of Christ (and save in two passages where tlie Ik is omitted for the sake of euphony no other is used). The natural inference is that when tliis expression or a stronger one is applied to the resurrection of Christ's people, it implies a resurrection of some in which otiiers are left behind. One who has examined this subject very fully says : " I am prepared to affirm that whenever tV or t'^ is used in connection with dvdo-Tacris, it is the resurrection of the just that is referred to ; or at least, a resurrection in which some are left behind." — See Wood's "Last Things," p. 59. PROGRESSIVE REVELATION. 69 The Vision of the Final Judgment. And I saw a great white throne, and Him that sat on it ; From whose face the earth and the heaven fled away, And there was found no place for them. And I saw the dead small and great, stand before God ; And the books were opened. And another book was opened which was the book of life, And the dead were judged Out of those things which were written in the books According to their works. And the sea gave up the dead which were in it ; And death and hades Delivered up the dead which were in them ; And they were judged, Every man according to his works. And death and hades were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death. And whosoever was not found written in the book of life Was cast into the lake of fire. This passage taken in its natural obvious sense, and with ita context, is clearly a sequel to the previous vision, and can be interpreted only in connection with it. The "rest of the dead," who lived not again then, do live again now ; those that had done good, rose in the bright morning of this day of the Lord, to the resurrection of life, those that have done evil, rise now at its lurid close, to the resurrection of judgment. The expression " the dead small and great " includes all who were dead, at the inauguration of this great session of judg- ment : not only the " rest of the dead " left behind at the time of the first resurrection, but all cut off during the course of the millennium, as well as the immense company of rebels, de- stroyed by fire from heaven, at its close. A little rencction will convince the thoughtful of the impos- 70 PROGRESSIVE REVELATION. sibility, that the church of the firstborn should be summoned to this bar of judgment. They have already been tried, con- demned, and executed, viz., in the person of the Surety. Rom. vi. 7, (Gr.) " He that has died is justified from sin (guilt) :" death exhausts the penalty. Ever since the mauiage of the Lamb, a thousand years before, they have been publicly owned as the bride of Christ, one with the occupant of the great white throne, united to Him, not only secretly by faith, but publicly in the eyes of the universe. They are his body, a part of Him- self; because He lives, they live also. And will He summon his dearly loved, blood-bought, long glorified bride, to be judged amid "the dead small and great"? Shall the saints stand and be tried, in company with their enemies and perse- cutors ? Why, Christ Himself is their righteousness, they are pure as He is pure ; shall they mingle again in the common herd of the fearful, and the unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters and liars, from whom grace made them, ages ago, to differ ? God covenanted with them to remember no more their sins and iniquities, and to blot out as a thick cloud their transgres- sions. Shall they now be called to account for the long cancelled score ? Ages since, they received the gift of God, eternal life ; shall He now call in question their right to his own gift ? For a thousand years they have been, by the Divine Judge himself, vindicated from every shade and suspicion of guilt, before the holy angels and the entire universe ; and shall they now descend from their priestly thrones, and with "blessed and holy " inscribed on their brilliant brows, and clad in their fine linen clean and white, as no fuller on earth can white it, stand amid the throng of the unholy and impure, to be Judged, and judged according to their works? To what end shoul'd they mingle with the " lost," from w-hom conversion long since severed them, and with the dead, from whom resurrection long since divided them ? To be afresh acquitted, say some, and to hear again the " Well done, good and faithful servant." Be it so ! but then w/iy is neither their presenec, nor their aequittal, PROCRESSIP^E REVELATION. ji 7wr their eternal portion, even so much as alluded to in the vision ? Why is there no mention of these ? Why do we read only of " the dead small and great," and of their condemnation alone ? The answer is clear. Because the dead only are there ! They seek in vain, who seek the living among the dead ! Such then is the apparent teaching of this vision, on the subject of judgment. It remains to be examined, whether the strong impression in the minds of many, that this doctrine is not only additional to, but contrary to, the doctrine of other parts of Scripture, is well grounded or not. We must, then, inquire on what passages this strong convic- tion is based» and whether they do definitely teach a simulta- neous ]n^gmQnt of the just and of the unjust. Let it be borne in mind that this is the point ; not the broad truth that both classes are to be judged. " It is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment," is a rule without exception, as far as we learn from Scripture. " Every one of us shall give account of himself to God." ''We shall all stand before the judgment seat of Christ." There is no possibility of mistaking the all-inclusive character of these and similar assertions ; but they leave untouched the question we have to consider. The statements, " the commander in chief will review the army," "he will review every regiment," "every officer and every private will pass in review before him," prove that all are to be reviewed, but not that all are to be reviewed at the same time. Those who are forced by its internal evidence to deny that the judgment vision of Revelation xx. includes the righteous, are not thereby forced to assert, that the righteous are to go unjudged. The point to be decided is exactly similar to that we have considered in connection with resurrection ; do earlier scriptures oblige us, by unequivocal assertion of simulta- neousness, to give a non-natural interpretation to these final prophecies ? or do they, in the light rellectcd back from these latest revelations, accommodate themselves naturally to a different sense ? The close connection which exists between resurrection and 72 PROGRESSIVE REVELATION. judgment, would lead us to expect that what has proved true in the one case, will do so in the other. The resunection of the dead and eternal judgment, are never separated by any consider- able or defined interval. If therefore the former is proved to be divided into two widely distant stages, the presumption is strong, that this will be the case also with the latter. The two resurrections indeed receive their distinctive appellations from the results of the judgments which accompany them ; the " resurrection of life," and " the resurrection of damnation." In reviewing the testimony of other scriptures on this subject, we are likely to find — in harmony with the principle of progressive revelation — many statements of the, broad funda- mental doctrine of future judgment, which fall in equally well with either view ; some few which at fiirst sight seem to teach simultaneousness, but which on closer examination will be seen to leave the point undecided ; and some, which can only be fairly interpreted, or fully understood, by assuming two epochs and scenes of judgment. Of the first class are such passages as, " we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, that every one may receive the things done in his body, according to that he hath done, whether it be good or bad." " God will render to every man ac- cording to his deeds" (Rom. ii. 5). "The Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father with his angels, and then shall He reward every man according to his works" (Matt. xvi. 27). ]\Iany such passages exist ; it is not needful to multiply quotations, no argument can be built on them, in favour of either view. Without further revelation we should doubtless have understood them to teach a simultaneous judgment ; with further revelation, we can read them as broad compre- hensive statements, made by One who knew, but did not at the time wish to rara/, modifying details. Such passages men- tion the universality of the judgment, the twofold result, the fact that it is to follow our Lord's return, and tliey show that in either case tlie issues will be eternal ; but they do not touch the question of si nuliancoiisness. PROGRESSIVE REVELATION. 73 With the closing parable of Matthew xxv. it is otherwise. This is the leading passage, of the second class above alluded to ; those which seem at first sight distinctly to teach a simul- taneous judgment of the righteous and the wicked. On any theory this passage is one difficult of interpretation, owing to its peculiar semi-parabolic form ; the difficulty of deciding whether it is a judgment of the dead or of the living; the principle of the judgment, — 7uorIcs, — taken in connection with the eternity of the issues in either case; the limited nature of the test, on which the great award is made to depend ; its relation to the previous parables ; its likeness to, yet dissimi- larity from, other parallel scriptures ; and other features. But the following considerations seem to make it clear, that the scene here described is not identical with that in Revelation XX. 12. This presents an award only, that an investigation, for " the books were opened and the dead were judged out cf those things written in the books ;" this presents the righteous and the wicked, and mentions the eternal portion of each , that, is silent altogether as regards the righteous ; this parable in describing those gathered before the Son of man, makes use of an expression applicable to the living, iravra to. tBvq, " all nations" or " the Gentiles ;" while the vision in the Apocalypse shows only the dead, " the dead small and great " ; in the former, the wicked are condemned en masse, on the negative ground of what they have not done ; in the latter, as indi- viduals, on the positive ground of what they hare done, "the things written in the books." If this parable does describe a judgment of the dead, (which is most unlikely,) then we are compelled by the later revelation to apply to it the same rule, as to the first class of passages, and to conceive that our Lord presented the judgment as a great whole, and was purposely silent, as to the interval be- tween its two stages. Other great and important events had to intervene ; the moral effect to be produced on the minds of his disciples by this truth of judgment to come, was the same, whether it were to take place at once, or at intervals ; and the 74 PROGRESSIVE REVELATION. object He had in view did not require that He should enter into details, for which they were not prepared. The same Divine reticence, which had purposely hid from their view the interval between his own approaching departure and his return, hid also the interval between the stages of this judg- ment. In this view of the passage the first session of the judgment is at the advent, when the righteous are rewarded with the kingdom ; the whole millennium is included under the phrase, " then shall He sit on the throne of his glory "' ; and the concluding session of the judgment is at its close, when the wicked are doomed to everlasting fire. A considerable part of the impression of simultaneousness which it produces on the mind, is to be attributed to the parabolic form of this prophecy. Divested of this, and trans- lated into a plain declaration of the future, it would seem as natural, to apply to it, as to any other passage on the subject, the principle of prophetic perspective.* Our Lord's parables in Matthew xiii. are also adduced as teaching the simultaneousness of the judgment, but the same * Professor Eirks, of Cambridge, to whose writings on prophecy frequent reference is made in tliese pages, while holding that there will be two re- surrections of the dead, the first at the beginning and the second at the end of the thousand years of Revelation XX., la^-s stress on the simidtancoiisiicss of tlie judgment of the saints and that of the ungodly, as involved in the discriminaiing character of the iirst resurrection. In a letter to the author, written after he had read the first four hundred pages of this work, I'rofessor IJirks says : " I agi"ce fully with almost every sentence in the first four hundred pages, except one small section, pp. 68-78. I think the vision from Revelation xvii. I toxxi. 8 is one integral part of the prophecy. I fully agree with M'hat you write on the first resurrection, but I think you overlook the fact that this resurrection is a public act of Divine acquittal to those included in it, and by the distinctness of the two resun^ections is implied sentence of condem- nation to those excluded from it. This account of final judgment then I tlius hold to be parallel to Matthew xxv., and that thesimultaneousnessof the twofold judgment is more strongly affirmed here than even there ; but with regard to tlie judgment on degrees of glory or of punishment, this extends over the whole day of judgment of a thousand years, and the two parts be- long to its evening and its morning. " ]\Iay God give an abundant blessing to your work, which I think to be one of great im]Jortancc and interest to the Church, from the amount ol precious and important truth which it unfolds. " PROGRESSIVE REVELATIO^T. 75 thing is true of them. Their object is to unfold the present mixed state of thing^s in the kingdom of heaven, in contrast with the pure state of things that shall exist af:er the end of this age. The division between the wheat and the tares, between the good fish and the bad, which takes place as we are expressly told at the end of this age, is a division effected at the advent, among the living not the dead ; it is a severing between real believers, and false professors ; between the true, and the apostate church. The tares are still growing with the wheat in the harvest field; "the field is the world." The fish are still struggling together in the gospel net ; there is no thought here of a resurrection of the dead, it is a sever- ance among the living. Other scriptures teach us that a resurrection of dead saints will take place at the advent, but that is not alluded to here. The tares are gathered in bundles to be burned, and the wlieat is gathered into the garner. "One shall be taken and another left." '• We who are alive and remain shall be caught up in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air." The parables of Matthew xiii. present the thought of severance, and not that of judicial investigation and award. We next look at the passages which teach more directly tlie truth, that judgment to come will take place in two stages. Foremost among them is our Lord's own memorable decla- ration, John V. 24 : " Verily, verily, I say unto you, he that heareth my word and believeth on Him that sent Me, lialh everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation, but is passed from death unto life." It is well known that the word here translated condemnation, (fp/o-ty, xw^dcci^ judgment, and is so translated in the verse but one previous. The believer shall not come into judgment, when judgment is to be to condemnation. Not, he shall not be condemned in the judgment, but he shall not even come into it. The same word is used in verse 21 and again in verse 29, where it is translated " damnation." Now this resurrection of damnation, or resurrection to judgment, is clearly that spoken of in Revelation xx. ; and into tliat, our 76 PROGRESSIVE REVELATION. Lord Himself declares his people shall not come. There shall be a reckoning of Christ with his people, as many passages which shall be examined presently teach ; but this is not judg- ment. Alford says : " the reckoning which ends with ' Eu ayaOt SovXf,' is not ' Kplais,' the reward is of free grace. In this sense the believers in Christ will not be judged according to their works. They are justified before God by faith, and dy God; efof 6 SiKaicjp — Tis 6 KaraKplvav; Their passage over from death to life, has already fahen place, — from the state of spiritual death, to that ^coiy aldivios which they {\ovcn already. It is to be observed that our Lord speaks in very similar terms of the unbelieving being co/idemned already, in chapter iii. i8. The perfect sense of yLerafii^r^Kiv must not be weakened or explained away." Let those who hold that there will be a simultaneous judgment of the just and of the unjust explain this statement of our Lord. He does not say that believers shall not be condemned in the judgment, but that they shall not come into it. Can anything be clearer than this ? Into what judgment then shall they come ? Into one, dis- tinct alike in its objects, principles, results, and period, from the judgment of Revelation xx. 12. In the judgment of sinners the object is to determine their eternal destiny; in the judgment of saints ///(?/> eternal destiny is already determined ; they are, from the moment they believe, indwelt by the Holy Ghost, one with the Lord Jesus, possessors of eternal life, and heirs of eternal glory. The resurrection which precedes their judgment has manifested this ; for when Christ their life appears, they appear with Him in glory, they see Him and are like Him, conformed to the image of God's 50n. Now it is clear, that when these already glorified saints stand before the judgment seat of Christ, the point to be investigated and settled is not whether they deserve and are to have eternal life and glory ; grace has already given them these, though they deserved eternal condemnation : but the point to be investigated and decided is, how far they have been faithful servants and stewards of their absent Lord ; how PROGRESSIVE REVEL ATI OX. -j-j far their works, as saved persons, can stand the test of Christ's judgment, and what measure of reward each is to enjoy. Their common possession of eternal Ufe does not forbid degrees in glory, and the fact that they are saved by grace does not forbid that they shall be rewarded according to their works. That this is a very different thing, from the eternal destiny of each individual, being made to depend on his own works, is evident. The judgment of sinners is on the ground of " rendering to every man according to his works," — justice ; the judgment of saints is on the ground of grace, for it is grace alone that rewards any of our works. The judgment of sinners ends in the blackness of darkness for ever; the judgment of saints ends in "then shall every man have/z'^/Vi? of God." The one is a judgment oi pcrsofis, the other of loorJzs only. The one as we have seen is prefigured in symbolic vision in Revelation xx. ; the other is spoken of in various places, in the epistles addressed to the early church. "Every man's work shall be made manifest, for the day shall declare it, because it shall be revealed by fire ; and the fire shall try every man's work, of what sort it is " ; that is, the search- ing, penetrating, soul-discerning judgment of Christ, shall put the works of his people to the test, and only the perfectly pure shall abide the test. Some works, like wood, hay and stubble, will be destroyed by this "fire" ; but, even so, the man who did them shall be saved; his works may perish but he shall ''never perish " according to his Saviour's promise. In Romans xiv. Christians are urged in view of this judgment, not to judge each other, "for we shall all stand before the /3vhi or Ju^Ja* ment seat of Christ," not the " throne," as in Revelation xx. The period of the judgment of sinners before the great white throne, is a thousand years or more after the coming of the Lord. The period of the judgment of saints is fixed to be at the coming of the Lord, i Corinthians iv. 5 : " therefore judge nothing before tlie time, nntll the Lord come, who both will bring to light the hidden things of darkness, and will make 78 PROGRESSIVE REVELATION: manifest the counsels of the hearts, and then shall every man have praise of God." We conclude therefore that these two judgments cannot be the same, and that so far from being at variance with other inspired prophecies, the twentieth chapter of Revelation enables us to understand and combine previous statements, and sheds new light on many also. Judgment will no more be simultane- ous than resurrection ; both will take place at two grand epochs, marking respectively, the morning and the evening, of the day of the Lord ; the former will be a resurrection and a judgment unto life, the latter a resurrection and a judgment unto condem- nation. Whence then has arisen the exceedingly prevalent opinion to the contrary ? From the littleness of the finite mind, that comprehends with difficulty the vast, far reaching, and complete designs of the Infinite ; from the lack in us of the patient continuance of searching the Scriptures ; from the irreverent neglect with which the last prophecy of the Bible is too often treated ; and from the not giving it, even when studied, its due authority — the non-recognition of the principle of Pro- gressive Revelation. From Dean Alford's Commentary on the New Testament we extract the followinj; testimony to the doctrine of two distinct resurrections of the dead. "I cannot consent to distort its words (Rev. xx.) from their ^Inin sense .nnd chrono- logical place in the prophecy, on account of any considerations of ditficulty, or any risk of abuses which the doctrine of the millennium may brint; with it. 'iiiosc who lived next to the apostles, and the whole Church for 300 years, understood them in tlio plain literal sense ; and it is a strange sight in these days to see expositors who arc among the first in reverence of antiquity, complacently casting aside the vii^st cni^ent instance pf consensus ivliich primitive antiquity presents. As regards the text itself, 7to leeritiviate treatment 0/ it will extort -Mhat is knoum as the spiritual interpreta- tion no'M in fashion. If, in a passage where t-,vo resurrections are mentioned, where certain ^vxoj- €i'T]jaP at the first, and the rest of the veKpol ilyjcruv only at THE ENt) OF A SPECIFIED PERIOD AFTER THAT FIRST,— if in SUch a paSsaL'C the firSt resurrection may be understood to mean spiritual rising with Christ, while the second means literal rising from the grave : then there is an end of all significance of language, and Scripture is wiped out as a definite testimony to anything. If the first resurrection is spiritual, then .so is the second, which I suppose none will be hardy enough to main- tain ; but IF THE SECOND IS LITERAL, THEN SO IS THE FIRST, 7('/«V/i in Common luitll the '.yhole priwitivc Church and many of the best vtodern expositors, I 7rtainiain and receive as an article of faith and hope." E.ND OF Part I. PART II. PR GRESSIVE INTERPRE TA TION. CHAPTER 1. EUMAN COMPREHENSION OF DIVINE PROPIIECV HAS PEEN, AND WAS INTENDED TO BE, PROGRESSIVE. — THREE IMPORTANT INFERENCES FROM DANIEL XII. 9. — THERE IS A BLAMELESS AND A GUILTY IGNORANCE OF THE FULFILMENT OF PRO- PHECY. — INSTANCES OF EACH. — REASONS FOR A PARTIAL AND TEMPORARY OBSCURITY OF PROPHECY; AND MEANS BY WHICH PROGRESSIVE COMPREHENSION OF ITS SIGNIFICA- TION HAS BEEN GRANTED. WE have seen that God has been pleased to reveal the future to men only by degrees ; that both in the num- ber of subjects on which the light of prophecy has been per- mitted to fall, and in the clearness and fulness of the light granted on each, there has been constant and steady increase, from the pale and solitary ray of Eden, to the clear widespread beams of Daniel, and to the rich glow of the Apocalypse. We now proceed to show that human comprehension of Divine prophecy has also been by degrees ; and that in certain cases it was evidently intended by God to be so. Light to understand the prophetic word, is as much a Divine gift as that word itself. The sovereignty of God was exercised in the selection of the matters to be revealed by prophecy, the time of the revelation, and the individuals to whom, and through whom, it should be communicated. And it is equally exercised 8o PROGRESSIVE INTERPRETATION. in the determination of the degree to which, and the time at which, the true meaning of certain prophecies shall be un- veiled, as well as in the selection of the individuals to whom the interpretation shall be given. " The Lord hath not only spoken by dreams and visions of old, but He speaketh also every day, even as often as He enlighteneth the minds of his servants, that they may be able to search out the hidden truth of his word, and bring it forth unto the world." * Prophecy, being essentially a rroelation of the future, is of course designed to be understood ; but it does not follow that it is designed to be understood immediately on its being given, nor by all who become acquainted with its announcements. The Most High has various ends to answer in predicting the future ; and though we may not always be able to discern his reasons for making revelations before He intends them to be comprehended, yet in some cases they are sufficiently clear. In foretelling, for instance, the first advent of his Son, God might have been pleased to predict its results, in as clear and unmistakable a manner as He predicted the event itself. But plainly to have foretold the rejection and crucifixion of the Lord Jesus by Israel, would have been to interfere with the free ac^ency of man ; it must either have had the effect of pre- venting the crucifixion of Christ, or else have given the Jews a valid excuse for killing the Prince of life. Not to have foretold the actual results at all, on the other hand, would have been to deprive Christianity of one of its main pillars of evidence, the fact that the events of the life and death of Jesus of Nazareth were predicted centuries before they took place ; it would have been to give some ground for pre- sent Jewish unbelief The alternative was to reveal the suffer- ing and death of Christ, but to reveal them i?i such a maiiner that " both Herod and Pontius Pilate, with the Gentiles and the people of Israel," when banded together to carry out their own wicked wills, were quite unconscious that they were therein • See preface to Brighlman's " Revelation of the Revelation," 1615. PROGRESSIVE INTERPRETATION. 8i doing, what his hand and his counsel had " determined before to be done." This secured the good, and avoided the evil ; the predictions were full and definite, and yet capable of being mis- understood : as a fact, they were not understood even by the disciples at first, nor are they understood to this day by the Jewish nation. They ought to have known Him, but " because they knew Him not, nor yet the voices of the prophets whicJi are read cvciy sabbath day, they fulfilled them in condemning Him." Thus it is possible to possess prophecies of cerlain events, to read them diligently all our lives, and yet not to understand their fulfilment, even when it takes place before our own eyes. This is sinful unbelief; but there is a temporary inability to understand Divine predictions, which is entirely free from sin, which is inevitable, and indeed ordained of God. The book of Daniel is one of the fullest revelations of the future contained in the Bible ; it is unequalled for the variety and minuteness of its historical detail, and for its breadth ol range, both chronological and geographical. It is closed by this remarkable injunction, (which applies, however, //iai/dy to the last prophecy in the book) : " But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, ruen to the time of the cud ; many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased . . . none of the wicked shall understand, but the wise shall under- stand." This passage seems to warrant three inferences of import- ance. 1 . That though God for certain reasons saw fit to give this revelation of the future to Daniel at a certain date. He did not intend it to be understood for centuries ; since, whatever may be the exact limits of the " time of the end," it could not include more than the course of this dispensation, and the commence- ment of this dispensation was several centuries distant, when Daniel wrote. 2. That even when in the lai)se of ages the meaning of this prophecy should become apparent to some, even when " know- 82 PROGRESSIVE INTERPRETATION. ledge '■' should " be increased " and the wise understand, it was the will of God that it should still remain a dark mystery to others, that "none of the wicked should understand." 3. And thirdly that the comprehension or ignorance of this prophecy, when the time for its being understood at all arrived, would depend rather on the moral than on tlie intellectual state of those who should study it. The 7visc alone should under- stand it ; the luicked should not. The first of these inferences is confirmed by i Peter i. 10 : " The prophets inquired and searched diligently . . . what manner of time the Spirit of Christ which was in them did sig- nify, when it testified beforehand the sufferings of Christ, and the glory that should follow. Unto whom it was revealed that not luito themselves, hut unto us they did minister the things . . . the angels desire to look into."' Peter here alludes evidently to this very passage of Daniel who *' inquired and searched diligently" about the time of the events revealed to him, ("O my Lord, what shall be the end of these things ? ") but he lays it down as a general principle, applicable to other prophets as well, that when they " testified beforehand, of the sufferings of Christ and the glories that should follow," they ministered not unto themselves but unto us. That is, they revealed not a proximate future, interesting themselves and their brethren of the Jewish economy especially, but a more distant future, per- taining to another dispensation altogether, and not designed to be understood till that dispensation daiuncd. The second of these inferences, tliat even when light was vouchsafed it would be partial, is confirmed by the words of our Lord, " it is given unto you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given." " Thou hast hid these things from the wise and prudent, and revealed them unto babes." The third inference, as to the moral character of those who receive prophetic light, is also confirmed by his words, " if any man will do his will, he shall know of the doctrine." It is " scoucrs walking after their own lusts " who are rcprc- PROGRESSIVE INTERPRETATION. 83 scnted as saying " where is the promise of his coming ? " and as being " wilUngly ignorant " of the purpose of God as ex- pressed in type, and in prophecy about the future. It is evident therefore that there may be sucli a thing as a blameless ignorance of the meaning of prophecy, as well as a blameworthy and guilty ignorance of it. The prophets were not to be blamed, for not understanding what God did not in- tend them to understand. Jews and infidels now, are to be blamed for a guilty unwillingness to perceive, the accomplish- ment of Old Testament prophecies, in New Testament events. Take as an instance of blameless ignorance, that of the apostles, even after Pentecost, as to the calling of the Gentiles. This, though in one sense a hidden mystery (Eph. iii. 9), had as a matter of fact, long been a revealed purpose of God. It had been foretold in type, in prophecy, and in promise, so that in Romans xiv. the apostle makes no less than four quotations in succession, to prove that // ^cas zurittai, and in Acts XV. James admits that " to this agree the words of the prophets." It was revealed, but not designed to be understood till a certain time, and then a special vision was sent to Peter, and a special revelation on the subject granted to Paul (EjjIi. iii. 3), to prepare their minds for the fulfilment of these long extant predictions, and to induce them to preach among the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ. Take as an instance of guilty ignorance, in the face of actual fulfilment, Jewish misunderstanding respecting the prophecies of the rejection and death of Messiah the prince. These events v/ere, as we have seen, distinctly revealed ; lie was to be " de- spised and rejected of men," "led as a lamb to the slaughter," "cut off yet not for Himself"; but the revelation was under- stood neither by " wise " nor " wicked " for a time. When the event had fulfilled and interpreted these predictions, the risen Saviour had still to address, to the two disciples going to Ein- maus, that rebuke which assumes both the fact of the revelation and of their duty to understand it : " O fools and slow of heart to believe, all that ihc prophets have si)okeii ; ought not Christ 84 PROGRESSIVE INTERPRETATION. to have suffered these things, and to enter into his glory?" To this day, those who have their minds still blinded through Jewish unbelief, find " a vail untaken away in the read- ipg of the Old Testament " and cannot perceive the accom- plishment of the Messianic prophecies in the life and death ot Jesus of Nazareth. Our Lord Himself revealed much that He knew his dis- ciples did not and could not understand at the time ; though He also withheld much that they were unprepared to re- ceive. '"Destroy this Temple, and in three days I will raise it up." It was not till after He was risen from the dead, that they caught the deep meaning of those pregnant words. " I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now." " The Comforter which is the Holy Ghost, shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remem- brance, whatsoever I have said unto you." Even after the resurrection had taken place we read, "as yet they knew not the scriptures that He should rise again from the dead." They were familiar with the words " Thou wilt not leave my soul in hades, neither wilt Thou suffer thine Holy One to see corruption "; but, even standing beside the empty sepul- chre, the true meaning of the words failed to penetrate the mists of Jewish prejudice, which darkened their minds. After Pente- cost however, when Peter had not only the inspired prophecy, but the inspiring Spirit to interpret it, how lucid and authorita- tive his explanation of these words : " men and brethren, let me freely speak unto you of the patriarch David, that he is both dead and buried, and his sepulchre is with us unto this day. . . . He being a prophet, spake of tlie resurrection of Christ, that Ids soul was not left in hades, neither his flesh did see cor- ruption. This Jesus hath God raised up, whereof we all are witnesses." On the same occasion he asserts that the pentecostal effusion of the Spirit, at which his audience were ignorantly marvelling, was the fulfilment of Joel's familiar but little un- derstood prediction: ^UJiis is that which Avas spoken by the prophet Joel." How did he know it ? The " untoward gene- PROGRESSIVE INTERPRETATIOX. 85 ration " whom he addressed thought not so, nor dreamed that they were witnessing the fulfih-nent of a Divine prophecy. Their account of the matter was very different ; "these men are full of new wine." This proves that spiritual e7iliohtenmcnt is reqiiiredjor the perception of the fulfilment oj prophecy, even iJi startling events wJiich may be taking place before our eyes. It is not too much to assume that the Apocalypse of St. John was also designed to be progressively understood ; that it forms no exception to the general rule, but was given to rascal the future by degrees, and only in proportion as the understanding of it might conduce, to the accomplishment of God's purposes, and the good of his people. Analogy forbids us to suppose, that such a prophecy could be clear all at once, to those to whom it was first given, and it equally forbids the supposition that it was never to be understood or interpreted at all. Can we not perceive reasons why God should in this case, act as He had so often acted before, and progressively reveal its meaning ? and can we not also perceive means by which such a progressive revelation of the meaning of this propliecy, might, as time rolled on, be made ? These questions may be unhesitatingly answered in the aflirmative. There are evident and weighty reasons why, in this prophecy above all others, the truth should not have been all at once apparent ; and although this book was the last work of the last apostle, and closes the canon of Scripture, it is not difficult to see the means by which God Himself might unveil its signification, at an advanced period of the dispensation. Let it be granted for a moment, (as it shall we hope be sub- sequently proved) that this prophecy contains an outline of all the great events of interest to the church of God, which were to happen prior to the second advent of Christ, as well as of that advent itself, and subsequent events ; and that not only are the events themselves predicted, but that the actual chrono- logy of some of them is predicted also, the duration for instance of the antichristian apostasy for a period of 1260 years. Sup posing this to be the case, it is clear that God, though giving S(5 PROGRESSIVE IXTERPRETATION. the prophecy in the apostohc age, caniiot have intended it to be understood for many many subsequent generations. It was the express will of Christ that the church should be ever waiting and watching for her Lord, uncertain as to the time of his return. The Holy Spirit could therefore no more have revealed clearly to the early church 1260 years of apostasy prior to the return of Christ, than He could have revealed a thousand years of millennial blessedness ; which as we have previously shown would have been inconsistent with his purpose. Must we therefore conclude : '■^ iJiis iJicn cannot be iJic character of the Apocalypse ; the same argument that proves that the mil- lennium must succeed the advent, proves also that no long period of apostasy can he predicted as to precede it " ? No ! but we con- clude hence, that if such a period be revealed, it must be in a mysterious form, not intended or adapted for comprehension at the time. If an apostasy of such duration be predicted, it must be so predicted as that the true, full, meaning of the pre- diction, should not be obvious for centuries, and yet be evident, as soon as altered circumstances should render the understand- ing of the prediction, desirable for the glory of God and the good of the church. A consideration of the problem shows, that the very same end that was to be attained by the church's ignorance of the true nature and duration of the apostasy in early ages, will in these last days be better attained by her acquaintance with both ; and will lead us to admire the wisdom and the grace of Him, who in this prophecy secured for her that ignorance while it was best, and laid up in store for her that knowledge, against the time when it should, in its turn, be most beneficial. " Known unto God are all his works from the beginning;" the real history and length of this dispensation were of course not only foreseen, but foreordained of God. For certain reasons Christ never mentioned them to his disciples, and the Holy Ghost revealed but little about them to Peter and Paul. What were those reasons ? To keep alive loving expectation of the Lord's second coming, to encourage believers to constant PROGRESSIVE LNTERPRETATIOX. %■> watchfulness, to cheer them by a present hope, and to weaken the power of temptation to earthliness and worldUness, by stamping on all things here uncertainty and evanescence. Her ignorance of the time of the ]\Iaster's return, is made a motive to " patient waiting for Christ." The first generation of believers took all the promises of his speedy return literally, and lived in the hope that they might remain to the blessed moment, and not sleep but be changed. The Holy Ghost did not undeceive them to any considerable extent ; in one case, where the due balance of patience and hope had been in measure lost, express revelations of intervening events were given to restore that balance, but no periods were assigned to these events (2 Thess. ii.) ; the hope was left vivid as ever, if not quite so close at hand. But this hope was born of inexpe- rience ; blessed and beautiful as it was, it was destined to wither away and be disappointed. The cold logic of facts proved it ill founded and mistaken, but did not render it the less sancti- fying and cheering : blessed be God, there is another kind of hope, born of patience and experience, and founded not on ignorance, but on knowledge. This hope dawned on the church, as the other sank beneath the horizon, and has gradually brightened ever since ; and it is a hope that shall " not make ashamed." Now it is clear, that had God revealed the duratior\ of the long antichristian apostasy to the early church, they tv'ould at once have been deprived of their holy, happy, hope. What help or consolation could the suftercrs and martyrs of early days have found, in gazing forward through well-nigh two thousand years of pagan and papal persecutions, of decay and death, and spiritual corruption ? The appalling prospect was in mercy hidden from their view, foreshortened almost to a point ; and the advent which was to close it all, was the grand object presented to their gaze. How could they have watched for an advent two thousand years off? what present ])ractical influence could it have exerted over their lives ? Tlieir igno- rance v/as evidently best for them, and God in mercy did not remove it. They held in their hands the prophecy, big with 83 PROGRESSIVE INTERPRETATION. the mournful secret ; but they guessed not its burden, in their bhssful and blameless ignorance they concluded that the " I come quickly" of their absent Lord, meant "quickly" according to human calculations. To leave them in their ignorance was the gracious purpose of God, and his motive was their comfort and sanctification. But it is equally clear that for us, believers of the nineteenth centur}', the case is reversed. A knowledge of the limits of the great antichristian apostasy, would not now deprive ns of hope, but the very contrary : in fact we need some such revelation to sustain our faith and hope to the end of the long delay; without the chronological data afforded us by the prophecies of Daniel and John, 7C'e should be in a position of fearful temptation to doubt and despair. They were entirely ignorant of tJic IcngiJi of the interval which we hnozv to have occurred, and this know- ledge absolutely prevents the general promises of the nearness of the second advent, from having the same power over us that they had over them. Those statements cannot convey to us, after a lapse of well-nigh two thousand years, the impressions they conveyed to the primitive saints. They seemed to justify them in expecting the coming of Christ in their own day ; but each succeeding generation would have less and less ground for such an expectation ; and when the promise was already one thousand years old, who could avoid the reflection, " since it has included one thousand years it may include another " ? We, after nearly two thousand years, could not, as we read the promise, escape the conviction, that having already included two thousand years, it was perfectly possible that two thousand more were yet to come. Each century of delay would thus increase the heart-sickness of hope deferred, and the church of these last days, might well hang down her head in the sor- rowful but irresistible conviction, that her redemption might still be at an immeasurable distance ; she could have no well grounded hope that the Lord was in any strict sense "at hand." Now one generation of his saints is as dear to God as another ; we may be sure He did not secure tlie holiness and PROGRESSIVE INTERPRETATION. 89 haj^piness of the early church, at the expense of ours, nor con- ceal what might be a blessing to us, because the knowledge might not have been a blessing to them. No ! He provided some better thing for us, than that we should float uncertainly on the stream of time, not knowing whether we were any nearer to the future than to the past advent of Christ. He revealed, but revealed in a mystery, all the main events of this dispensation, and nearly two-thirds of its duration ; He revealed them, in just such a way, as best to secure a renewal of hope that should give consolation, and revive in these last times a " patient waiting for Christ." Since continued ignorance of the true nature and length of this dispensation^ as determined beforehand in the counsels of God, would have produced the very opposite effects designed by the permission of temporary ignorance, we have every reason to conclude, that God would in due time replace this latter by knowledge, and give a gradually increasing understanding of the inspired predictions. And if it be asked Jiotu this could be done, since inspira- tion has passed away and apostolic explanations can no longer be enjoyed, we reply, by the same means by which the in- terpretation of earlier prophecies was given to Peter, by their fulfilment before otir eyes, and by the teaching of the Holy Ghost, enabling us so to discern the true nature of events, as to recog7iise the correspondence between them and the long familiar predictions. When the heart is docile, and the mind free from prejudice, a comparison of inspired prediction and historic fulfilment, is sufficient to show the relation between them ; to whatever extent prejudice exists, spiritual perception is blunted; where it reigns supreme, as in the case of the Jewish nation, "blindness in part has happened," and the ignorance being wilful, is necessarily a guilty ignorance, like that of Israel in apostolic days. Oh, how it behoves Christians to take heed, that they be not thus ignorant of the real meaning of apoca- lyptic prophecy ! Another observation may confirm our conviction, that it was the intention of God in the earlier parts of the Apocalypse, to CO PROGRESSIVE INTERPRETATION. conceal for a time the real nature of the events, and the true length of the periods, therein revealed. The future, which for the sake of the early church required to be hidden under a veil of mystery, was of course only the future of tJiis dispensa- tion. No prolonged interval was to be interposed between the church and her hope, — the return of her Lord ; but the same concealment was not requisite as regards subsequent events and their duration. If then the principle for which we contend be true, there will be found an air of mystery about the times and seasons mentioned prior to the advent vision, and an absence of it subsequently. This is exactly what exists. There are eight passages in the earlier part of the book, where periods of time, are named by phrases which are obviously uncommon, not the ordinary or natural mode of designating the period they seem to suggest, but all having an air of mystery. In the vision which immediately follows that of the advent, on the contrary, a period is six times over mentioned in tJic simplest possible form, " a thousand years." Why this difference ? The real length of t/iis age of sin and suftering was to be hidden for a time ; but there was no need to hide the real length of the blessed age of purity, peace, and joy which is to succeed it. We conclude then, that since God has constantly acted on this principle, of gradually revealing the meaning of his own predictions, both in the Old and New Testaments, since we can see special reasons why He should do so, and a simple means by which He could do so, in this case, and since the construction of the book affords internal evidence of such an intention, that there is the strongest presumption that the meaning of the apocalyptic prophecies was designed to become clear to the church only by degrees. We conclude, that though the Apocalypse was not, like the visions of Daniel, to be supplemented by later revelations, and understood only in the light reflected Imck from these, yet it was to receive explanation from other sources, so that while it was a mystery in the early ages of the church, it should unfold PROGRESSIVE I XT ERF RET A TION. 91 its own meaning gradually, during the course of the dispensa- tion, and become increasingly clear and consequently increas- ingly precious, in the last days. We conclude also, that like Daniel's predictions and all other prophecy, it is not intended ever to become self-evidcntly clear, that even when understood by " the wise," its meaning will still be hidden from the world, and that consequently the true interpretation, whenever it shall arise, will have many adver- saries, and be rejected with contempt by "■ the wicked," even while it is being fulfilled before their eyes. These legitimate conclusions will lead us to expect the primitive interpretation of the premii/ennial visions of the Apo- calypse, to be the least correct ; though it might be, probably would be, right as to events subsequent to this dispensation. They prepare us to weigh with candour, the interpretations of later times, and forbid us to reject, on the ground of novelty, any view that attaches to these mysterious predictions a mean- ing worthy of Divine inspiration, and calculated to accomplish good in the church, even though it may have been unknown to the fathers, and even though it may be rejected and ridiculed by multitudes. These conclusions will lead us to expect the true interpretation to arise only after many many centuries of the church's history had rolled away, when the bright hope of early days had quite died out ; and to have the effect of quickening the church afresh to the patient waiting for Christ. But we should expect also that the true clue to the mysteries of the Apocalypse, once discovered, would not be immediately applied correctly ; so that it would never practically have the effect of leading the church to think the Lord's return a very distant event, however much it might, theoretically considered, seem likely to do so. In other words, that God would not suddenly illuminate these predictions and so translate the church at a bound from perfect ignorance to perfect knowledge of the fore-appointed length and character of this dispensation ; but that He would enlighten her da?-kncss gradually, by leaving a measure of obscurity till towards the close ; would allow her 92 PROGRESSIVE INTERPRETATION. still, as at the first, to expect the great consummation long before its predestined date, and sustain her by revealing fresh grounds of hope, based on more accurate apprehension of the truth, as each erroneous anticipation was disappointed by the event. We shall consequently expect to find every generation of saints, after the true key to the book has once been found, 7naki7ig adva7iccs on the last, and the discrcpamics existing be- tween their z'iezcs will not stumble us, or lead us to reject them all as ungroimdcd. We shall trace the vein of truth growing wider and deeper ; we shall watch the ever brightening dawn of the true light ; and far from deeming this gradual discovery of the meaning of the ai)ocalyptic prophecies, with its consequent inevitable discrepancies, a proof that they have no meaning, or none worth seeking, we shall accept it as a proof, of the pur- pose of God to act, still, as ever, on the principle of progressive revelation. Now on reviewing the history of apocalyjjtic interpretation we find that the early church were right in their interpretation of the visions which follow the second advent, they understood correctly, that which it was not the purpose of God to conceal from them. All the primitive expositors and teachers 7aere fre- millennialists. With the exception of Origen, who spiritualized everything, and of a few who denied the inspiration and apostolicity of the book, all the early fathers up to the time of Constantine, including Justin Martyr, Irenxus, Tertullian, Hippolytus, Victorinus, Methodius, Lactantius, held that the first resurrection of Revelation xx. was a literal resurrec- tion, prior to a personal reign of Christ on earth. The ex- pectation of a spiritual millennium, to precede the coming of the Lord, grew up only in the more corrupt ages of the church, after her union with the world in the days of Constantine.* As to the previous predictive visions of the book, the numerous commentaries on the whole, and the almost in- numerable explanations of parts of it, which have appeared, * EllioU, " liorrc," vol. iv., p. 306. PROG RES SI VK /NTERPRETA TION. 93 may be :uTaii;.^c(l in iIul-l- distincl classes, which for conve- nience' sake have been dentjininaled I'retcrist, Futurist, and J'resentist schemes of inter])retali(jii ; each of these classes embraces a great variety of exiJ(jsitions, but tiie interpretations of each class have a //^«^/,'////;r//'Ai/ resemblance to each other, and d'Aicx fiindamr/ila/Iy from those of the other two. 'Hie first or J'rk'ikkist scheme, considers these prophecies to have been fulfilled in the downfall of the Jewish nation and tlic (j1(1 Rtjuiaii empire, limiting their range thus to the first six centuries of the Christian era, and making Nero Antichrist. 'I'his sclieme originated with the Jesuit Alcazar towards the end of the sixteenth century ; it has beyn held and taught under various modifications by Orotius, Hammond, I'.ossuet, JMchhorn and other (German commentators, Moses Stuart, and Dr. Davidson. It has ic\'i supporters now, and need not be described more at length. Moses Stuart bases it on the denial ol the very principle for which we arc contending; he takes it for granted that tiie writer had an " iinincdiatc object in view when he wrote the book," and that the orii^incii readers of the Apocalypse icndcrstood il ; and argues that it must therefore treat of such matters as they could understand. Jjut his only reason for this assertion is that he cannot conceive how " a sensible man " could write a book " which would be unin- telligible to those to whom it wai; addressed ; " and lie proceeds to admit that there is no evidence extant to show that the early C'iiristians understood it. Further on he says that "very soon after this age, it was so interiireted that grave obstacles were raised to the reccjjtion of the book as canonical." And looking back from the end of the eighth century, after reviewing all the previous expositors of Revelation, he says "we find that no real and solid advances were yet made " towards a satisfactory explanation of the book. 'J'hus he assumes that its first readers were intended to understand il, and assumes that they did tlo so, while admitting that there is not the .slightest proof to support (.'itlKT assumption, and that the light if ever jiossossed, was very (luickly lost. J lis work evinces much learniiv; but 94 PROGRESSIVE INTERPRETATION. little spirituality, and treats the Apocalypse too much as a merely human production ; his views are happily not shared by many. The second or Presentist interpretation, is that historic Protestant view of these prophecies, which considers them to predict the great events to happen in the world and in the church, from St. John's time to the coming of the Lord ; which sees in the Church of Rome, and in the Papacy, the fulfilment of the prophecies of Babylon and of the Beast, and which inter- prets the times of the Apocalypse on the year-day system. This view originated about the eleventh century, with those who even then began to protest, against the growing corruptions of the Church of Rome. It grew among the Waldenses, Wick- liffites, and Hussites, into a consistent scheme of interpretation, and was embraced with enthusiasm and held with intense con- viction of its truth, by the Reformers of the sixteenth century. In their hands it became a powerful and formidable weapon, to attack and expose the mighty apostasy, with which they were called to do battle. From this time it spread with a rapidity that was astonishing, so that ere long it was received as a self evident and fundamental truth, among Protestant churches everywhere. It nerved the Reformers of England, France, Germany, Switzerland, Denmark, and Sweden, and animated the martyrs of Italy and Spain ; it decided the conscientious and timid adherents of the Papacy to cross the Rubicon, and separate from the so called Catholic Church ; and it has kept all the Reformed churches since, from attempting reunion with Rome. It was held and taught by Joachim Abbas, Walter Brute, Luther, Zwingle, IMelanchthon, Calvin, and all the rest of the Reformers ; by BuHinger, Bale, and Foxe ; by Brightman and Mede, Sir Isaac and Bishop Newton, Vitringa, Daubuz and Whiston, as well as by Faber, Cunningham, Frere, Birks and Elliott ; no two of these may agree on all questions of minor detail, but they agree on the grand outline, and each one has added more or less to the strength and solidity of the system, PROGRESSIVE INTERPRETATION. 95 by his researches. During the last seven centuries this system has been deepening its hold on the convictions of the Christian church, and has been embraced by some of her wisest and best guides and teachers. It originated with martyrs and con- fessors, exerted a sanctifying and strengthening influence over those who received it ; it tended to revive the hope of the premillennial coming of the Lord, which had long lain in abey- ance, leading naturally to many false anticipations of that event, which have been disproved by time, as well as to many very remarkable approximations to the truth, as to the time of othel events. It met of course with intense and bitter opposition from the church it branded as Babylon, and the power it de- nounced as Antichrist, and to this day is rejected by all who in any way maintain or defend these, as well as by some who do neither. The third or Futurist view, is that wliich teaches that the pro phetic visions of Revelation, from chapters iv, to xix., prefigure events still wholly future and not to take place, till just at the close of this dispensation. It supposes '• an instant plunge ot the apocalyptic prophecy, into the distant future of the con- summation." "' This view gives the literal Israel a large place in the Apocalypse, and expects a personal infidel Antichrist, who shall bitterly oppress the saints for three years and a half, near the date of the second advent, thus interpreting time as well as much else in the Apocalypse, literally. This view is, in a certain sense, the most ancient of the tlirce ■for the primitive fathers agree in several of these latter points. In its present form however it may be said to have originated at the end of the sixteenth century, with the Jesuit Ril^era, who, moved like Alcazar, to relieve tlie Papacy from the terrible stigma cast upon it by the Protestant interpretation, tried to do so, l-)y referring these prophecies to tlie distant ///////r, instead of like Alcazar to the distant /rt-^/. For a considerable period this view was confined to Romanists, and was refuted by several • Elliott, iv., 561, 96 PROGRESSIVE INTERPRETATION. masterly Protestant works. But of late years, since the com- mencement of this century, it has sprung up afresh, and sprung up strange to say among Protestants. It was revived by such writers as the two jNIaitlands, Burgh, Tyso, Dr. Todd, the leaders of the " l^rethren " generally, and by some Puseyite expositors also. It is held thus by extreme parties ; by those who though Protestants, are ashamed of the Reformation, speak of it as an unwarrantable schism, and verge as closely on Rome as is possible ; and by those, who though Protestants, deem the glorious Reformation to have stopped grievously short of the mark, and see so much of Babylon still, in the Reformed churches, that they refuse to regard them as having come out of Babylon, or as victors over Antichrist. It is held under a greater variety of modifications than the other two, no two writers agreeing as to what the symbols do prefigure, but all agreeing that they do Jiot prefigure anything that has ever yet taken place. Those who hold this view support it, among other arguments, by the authority of the primitive church. They say : "the fathers had apostolic tradition ; they had no controversial bias ; their opinion ought to have great weight; the historical interpret- ation was unknown in the church for one thousand years or more ; our view is the original view of the early Christians T/iey expected that Antichrist would be an individual man ; so do 7l'c: They expected him to be an infidel atheistic blas- phemer, not a Christian bishop ; so do we. Tlicy believed his tyranny would last three years and a half immediately prior to the coming of Christ ; so do we. They took the days, weeks, and months of the Apocalypse literally ; so do weT Now we readily admit this agreement (though indeed it is by no means so perfect as is implied"'''), and reply that herein lies a very strong presiiniptlon against the Futurist scheme. It is a return io^ that early interpretation of the prophecies, which 'was necessarily defective and erroneous, seeing it was not Sec Elliotl, " lIoiK Apocalyptica;," vol. iv., p. 612, PROGRESSIVE INTERPRETATION. 97 the purpose of God, to permit a premature comprehension of the. nature and length of this dispensation. It is a view which re- jects the light as to tlic purposes of God, which experience of the providence of God has afforded. It exalts the im- pressions of ignorance, above the ripe results of mature knowledge, and claims prestige for primitive views, on points where posterior views are necessarily preferable. It treats in- experience as wisdom, and despises as folly the wisdom acquired by eighteen hundred years' experience, of the most wonderful providential dealings of God. It recommends those who are of full age to return to the opinions of child- hood, forgetting that errors excusable in children are inex- cusable in men. The early church knew nothing of the mar- vellous ecclesiastical phenomena with which we are acquainted ; their ignorance of the true scope of the prophecy was unavoid- able ; we have seen the awful apostasy that has lorded it for more than twelve hundred years in the church of God; similar ignorance in us is without excuse, for experience ought to teach. The Futurist view denies progressive ixvelation, and asserts that the early church understood the Apocalypse better than the church of after-times, which is contrary to tlie ana- logy of Scripture, and to the apparent purpose of God. Two main systems of interpretation of this final revelation of Scripture, are then before us : which is likely to be the true ? The one characterized the infancy of the church, the other was the offspring of mature experience : the one sprang up amid utter ignorance of the actual purpose of God ; the other in view of his accomplished providence : the one can never be brought to any test ; the other at every point exposes itself to critical examination : the one was and is held by the apostate and perse- cuting church of Rome ; the other by multitudes of confessors and a glorious army of martyrs : the one leaves us to form our own opinion of the greatest fact in the history of the church, the papal system of ecclesiastical corruption and tyranny ; the other gives us God's infallible and awful judgment about it : the one was never more than a barren speculation ; the otlier has u • 93 PROGRESSIVE INTERPRETATION. been and is, a inigJity potoer for good : the one leaves us in dismal doubt as to our place in the prophetic calendar ; the otlicr makes us lift up our heads, to catch the glow of the coming sunrise. The presumption is surely against the modern revival of the primitive view. A return to primitive doctrine is good; no progressive revelation of the dogma of justification by faith, for instance, was to be expected ; innovation in questions of faith is condemned ; we are " earnestly to contend for the faith once delivered to the saints." But prophecy is not doctrine, and its very nature implies that it must be capable of receiving elucidation from the course of providence. The Protestant historical system of apocalyptic ititerpretation is based on this fact, and has consequently a strong presumption in its favour. But presumption is not proof; and the question is of such im- portance that a fuller examination must now be attempted. Three main points require to be settled before we can hope to arrive at the meaning of the prophecies of the Revelation. 1. Is the Apocalypse to be understood literally? and if not, on what principle is it to be interpreted ? 2. Is it a fulfilled or partially fulfilled prophecy ? or does it refer to events still future? 3. Is it a Christian or a Jewish prophecy? That is, does it bear to the church, and to her fortunes in the world, the same relation that earlier prophecy bore to Israel, and to their fortunes in the world ? These questions will be considered^ in the chapters which follow. CHAPTER II. CONSIDERATION OF CEP^TAIN EROAD PRINCIPLES, ON WHICH THE APOCALYPSE IS TO EE INTERPRETED. — IT IS A SYM- BOLIC PROPHECY, AND I\IUST BE TRANSLATED INTO ORDINARY LANGUAGE BEFORE IT CAN EE UNDERSTOOD, T is clear that before a student can understand a given work, he must be acquainted with the language in which the book is written ; and he must read it as written in that language, not in another. If the work be in French, he will fail to decipher its meaning if he reads the words as Latin or as English. In what language is the Apocalypse written ? Is it to be understood literally ? If not, on what principle is it to be in- terpreted ? It is obvious to the most superficial reader, that in its actual texture and construction, the Apocalypse is a record of visions that are past. All allow that it is nevertheless, as to its mean- ing, a prophecy of events that are future, or zuejx future at the time that the visions were granted to St. John. The angel calls the book a prophecy, " seal not the sayings of the pro- phecy of this book, for the time is at hand." Of its prophetic character there can therefore be no more question, than that lis form is a record of past visions. In the strictest sense then no one understands the book literally ; for the statement, " I saw a beast rise up out of the sea," taken literally, is in no sense whatever a prophecy ; it is a narrative of a past event, not a prediction of a future one. Such literalism as this is divinely excluded. John beheld things which were to take place " hereafter," but the future was signified to the apostle in a series of visions. The book is " The Revelation of Jesus Chrii^t, which God loo PROGRESSIVE INTERPRETATION. gave to Him, to show unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass ; and He sent and signified it by his angel, unto his servant John." To " signify '"' (o-Tj/xatVw) is to show by signs, to intimate your meaning, not in plain words, but by signs and symbols. Now it were clearly folly, to confound the sign ivith the thing signified. In a language of signs, each sign and each combina- tion of signs, has a definite meaning. The first verse of the book therefore answers our first question about it : is it to be understood literally ? No ! it is a book of sigxs. Its true meaning is veiled under significant figures, and a process of translation must take place, ere that true meaning can be reached. Each symbol used, must be separately studied, and its force gathered, from its context, from comparison with other scriptures, from its own nature, and from such explana- tions as are given in the prophecy itself, before we can expect to discover the mind of the Spirit of God in this book. If on opening a letter from a friend, the first sentence that met the eye was "I write in Latin in order that my letter may not be understood by all," we should at once be prepared to translate as we read ; we should not pore over a certain com- bination of letters and syllables, trying in vain to make some intelligible English word out of them ; we should say the tuord is so and so, but the meaning is so and so. In reading the symbolic portion of the Apocalypse, we are bound to do the same ; on no other principle can anything like a consistent interpretation be attained. The nature of the case forbids it. And yet an opposite maxim of interpretation is often laid down ; it is said, take everything literally unless you are forced by impossibility in the nature of things, to give a symbolic signifi- cation. This is like saying, if you can find any combination of letters or syllables in this Latin letter, that will form any English word, take it as English, but where you cannot pos- sibly make anything out of them as English, then no doubt ihey are Latin. What a singularly lucid communication would be the result of such a system of interpretation 1 And yet, PROGRESSIVE INTERPRETATION. loi alas ! it is in connection with the Apocalypse too common, among some, whose spirituality and intelligence ought to be fruitful of more wisdom. Such interpreters argue in defence of the monstrosities evoked by their hybrid system, somewhat in this way : " The Nile was once literally turned to blood, we doubt not therefore that this prediction, Revelation viii. 8, ' the third part of the sea became blood,' means just what it says; God, who wrought the one miracle, can accomplish the other." Undoubtedly : the question is not what God can do, but what He here says He tvill do. Now Exodus is a literal history; when it says the river became blood it vicaiis it ; Revelation is a symbolic prophecy, when therefore it says " the third part of the sea became blood," it does not mean it., but it means some- thing entirely different ; and it is needful not only to substitute a future for a past time, but to translate these symbols into plain language, in order to ascertain what tJie meaning really is. It would be ludicrous, were it not painful, to contemplate the absurdities and inconsistencies, which have arisen from a neglect of this simple and almost self-evident maxim of inter- pretation, demanded by the opening verse of the book, as well as by its whole construction. To overlook it is to turn the most majestic and comprehensive prophecy in the Bible, into a chaos of vague monstrosities, unworthy of being attri- buted to inspiration ; it is " to degrade the highest and latest of God's holy revelations, into a grotesque patchwork of un- meaning prodigies."* Prophecy like science has its own peculiar language ; for understmidiug the prophecies, therefore, as Sir Isaac Newton justly observes, we are in the first place to acquaint ourselves with the figurative language of the prophets. " In the infancy of society ideas were more copious than words ; hence . . . men were obliged to employ the few words which they possessed, not only in their natural and direct sense, but likewise in an artificial and tropical sense. . . . Half civilized nations abound in • Bilks. I02 rROGRESSIVE INTERPRETATION. metaphor and allegory. . . . A\"hy is it that a Cherokee warrior talks of burying the hatchet and of lighting the pipe ? . . His meagre language cannot supply him with the various terms, which the precision of modern diplomacy has rendered familiar to Europeans, and therefore he expresses the making of peace by allusion to certain well known ceremonies attend- ant upon it. . . . If such then of necessity was the language of defective civilization, such also would be the first rude at- tempt to express it in writing. The earliest manuscripts were neither more nor less than pictures, but these pictures closely followed the analogy of spoken language : . . . hence they were partly proper, and partly tropical. A member of a half civilized community, who wished to express to the eye the naked idea of a man, would rudely delineate the picture of a man, ... a brave, and ferocious, and generous man, he was already accustomed to detioniinaie a lion, if therefore he wished to ex- press such a man in writing, he would delineate a lion. . . . Nation bears to nation, the same relation, that individual bears to individual. Hence, according to their attributed character- istics, this nation would be t/ie Jion ; that would be the bear ; and that would be the tiger. . . . The general prevalence of the science of heraldry in all ages, under one modification or another, perpetuated and extended the fomi of speech to which it owed its origin. Thus the dove was the ancient banner of the Assyrian empire. . . . Such is the principle on which is built the figurative language of prophecy. Like the ancient hieroglyphics, and like those non-alphabetic characters which are derived from them, it is a language oj ideas rather than of words. It speaks by pictures, quite as much as by sounds , . . Nor is this derogatory to the all-wise spirit of prophecy . . . when God deigns to converse with man, He must use the lan- guage of man. The Scriptures were designed for the whole world ; hence it was meet, that their predictions should be couched in what may be termed a universal language. But the only universal language in existence, is the language of hieroglyphics. To understand this character, we have not the least occasion to PROGRESSIVE INTERPRETATION. 103 understand the spoken language of the nation who uses it, . . . not being alphabetic it is the representative, not of words but of things. . , . Let the conventional mark be extended to the whole world, and we have forthwith a written universal language. Our common numerical cyphers, so far as they extend, form a universal language ; for the figures i 2 or 3 convey the same ideas to each person that uses them, by whatever different na?nes the numbers themselves may be called. In the use of this language there is by no means that obscurity and uncer- tainty which some pretend. They might just as reasonably throw aside a Chinese inscription as incapable of being de- ciphered. Without a key neither can be understood, but when the key is procured, the book will very readily be opened. Noia the key to the scriptural hieroglyphics, is fur' nisJied by Scripture itself, and when the import of each hiero- glyphic is thus ascertained, there is little difficulty in translating, as it were, a hieroglyphical prophecy, into the unfigured phraseo- logy of modern language. . . . When once it is known that a wild beast is the symbol of an idolatrous and persecuting empire, and when the empire intended, has been satisfactorily ascertained, it matters not whether this deed or that deed be verbally ascribed to the empire, or symbolically ascribed to the wild beast. Either mode of speech is equally intelligible. . . . In any case the elements of a language must be first learned, but when that has been accomplished, the rest will follow of course, whether the language in question be verbal or hieroglyphical."* It is hardly needful to add that there are exceptions to this rule as to every other. Plain predictive sentences and literal explanatory clauses are interspersed here and there, amid the signs of this book. They stand out from the general text, as distinctly as a few words of English introduced hero and there in a page of a Greek book would do ; it needs no signpost to say " adopt a literal interpretation here." They speak for them- Fabci-'s '-Sacred Calendar of Prophecy, " vol i., chap. i. I04 PROG RES SI VE LYTERPRE TA TION. selves, common sense dispenses with critical canons, and re- cognises them unaided. Any system of interpretation that violates this fundamental law of the book is thereby stamped as erroneous. The system that says : " Babylon means Babylon ; and the literal ancient Babylon will, we are bound to believe, be revived," must be false. In the Apocalypse, Babylon does not mean Babylon, nor Jerusalem Jerusalem, nor a Jew a Jew, nor the temple the temple ; the system therefore that says " all this Jewish imagery proves that the book has reference to the future of the Jewish nation, and not to the future of the church," must be false. All this Jewish imagery is symbolic ; these things are used as signs. Everything connected with Israel was typical of things connected with the church. The thiiigs signified must therefore be Christian, otherwise the sign and the thing signi- fied, would be one and the same. The system that says the New Jerusalem is a literal city, 1500 miles square and 1500 high (!), made of gems and gold, must be false; the New Jeru- salem is a sign ; the thing signified, is the glorified church of Christ, as comparison with other Scripture proves.* The Divine explanation attached to some of the earliest symbols employed in the book, furnish the key by which much of its sign-language is to be interpreted. They are to the sym- bology of the Apocalypse, what the Rosetta stone was to the hieroglyphics of Egypt. " The seven stars are the angels of the seven churches, and the- seven candlesticks which thou sawest are the seven churches." The seven branched candle- stick, was one of the most important emblematic vessels in the tabernacle " which was a figure for the time then present " of spiritual realities. John saw seven separate candlesticks, and saw Christ the great High Priest, walking in their midst, like * "The application of symbols literally seems to me to be very false in principle, and a very unsuitable mode of interpretation. It is ihe denial that they are symbols. I believe the language of symbols to be as definite as any other, and always used in the same sense as much as language is." — ^J. N. Darby, " Notes on Revelation," p. 31. PROGRESSIVE INTERPRETATION. Aaron, trimming his lamps. He tells John what the emblem represents ; the seven candlesticks symbolised the seven churches of Asia. This explanation authorizes us whenever we meet the same symbol of a candlestick, to attach to it the same signification; and it does more. The candlestick was one feature of the tabernacle and temple economy, in which roery feature was typical of heavenly things ; many other symbols borrowed from the same system, appear in the Apocalypse : tJiis ojie key unlocks them all. We have no right to say that the ark of the covenant, the altar, the sea of glass, the temple of the tabernacle of the testimony, the court, the holy city, the New Jerusalem, the priests and their garments, or the worship- pers, are to be taken literally. We are bound on the contrary to interpret them all on one harmonious principle. The seven candlesticks mean seven Christian churches, that is, they are a perfect representation of the Christian church. A Christian and not a fewish sense, then, must attach to all the rest. The seven stars are not a part of the tabernacle system, but they are equally symbols, standing for a reality of an entirely different nature. Whatever the angels of the churches were, they were not stars ; and whenever we meet witli this symbol in the book, we may be sure from the Lord's translation of it here, that it will 7wt mean literal stars, but rulers, governors, chief men, messengers, or something analogous. " The seven stars are the angels of the seven churches." What sort of con- sistency would there be in th^ book, if a star in one place meant a ruler, and in the next a literal star ? Language used in so indeterminate and inexplicable a way, would cease to answer the purpose of language , no definite meaning could attach to it. The study of the Apocalypse might well be abandoned, as more hopeless than that of the hicroglypliics, or the arrow-headed inscriptions of remotest antiquity ; for these we possess keys, for the Apocalypse none, // oiir Lord's otvn expla7iations are irjccted as such. There is another indication of the same kind in the twice repeated ex])ression, " whicli say they are Jews and are not, but do lie." The parties alkidcd lo6 PROGRESSIVE LYTERPRETATIOy. to, clearly were literal Jews, but being unbelievers, our Lord here denies to them the name, thereby taking from '■'■Jtiv'' thenceforth, its old literal meaning and confining it to a higher sense. " He is not a Jew which is one outwardly, neither is that circumcision which is outward in the flesh : but he is a Jew which is one inwardly, and circumcision is that of the heart." These explanations and indications at the commence- ment of this prophecy, are like a Divine warning against the error of taking these Jewish emblems literally ; in the Apoca- lypse they must uniformly be interpreted as sigJis of other things. In every part of Scripture it is the spirit, and not the letter, that is life and light giving ; how especially must this be the case in a part where the letter, that is the outward form and expression of the truth, is so mysterious, so enigmatical, so unspiritual, as in the Apocalypse ? Popery has surely read the church of Christ a lesson, as to the danger of a false literalism ; and yet if there be an apparently simple sentence in the Bible it is surely " this is my body." How can they who object to a literal interpretation of these words, consistently claim one for the strange supernatural symbolisms of the Apocalypse? " That literalism is to be renounced which involves a contradiction to the purified reason, or narrows and contracts the messages of God below the instincts of a holy and spiritual mind."* Another argument for the symbolic and Christian nature of this book may be drawn from the fact that it is written by John. A unity of character and style generally attaches to the different writings of the same author ; and, subordinate to the higher unity of inspiration, this may be detected in the writings of the New Testament. One who is familiar with the style of Paul, for instance, would find it hard to believe that any one else was the author of the epistle to the Hebrews ; and one who has entered into the peculiar matter and manner and spirit of John's gospel would, even were they anonymous, assign his three epistles to him. • Ciiks, " Elements," p. 25c. PROGRESSIVE INTERPRETATION. 107 They are characterized by the same selection of high and deep truth ; by the same spirituaHty and uneartlihness ; by the same profound simpHcity of style ; by the same massive divisions, which overlook all minor distinctions ; by the same unguarded breadth ot statement, which leaves aside qualifying limitations ; by tlie same marked, abrupt,, contrasts ; by the same ignoring of the Jews, and disowning of everything Jewish, based on the great lact stated at the commencement of the gospel, " He came unto his own, and his own received Him not "; and by a recurrence of many of the very same ideas and forms of expression. It may safely be asserted that John, is the least Jewish and the least earthly of all the apostles, and of all the writers of the New Testament. The Apocalypse is written by this same John ; not only it claims to be so, and is proved by external evidence to be so, but it bears internal evidence of the fact. Though in very different connections, we meet' with too many of the peculiar thoughts and expressions of John, to admit of any doubt as to the authorship of the book. " Tire Word of God," " the light," " a voice," "the Lamb of God," "the witnesses," the ascending and descending angels, the temple, the temple of his body, the living water, the shepherd leading the sheep ; these and many such points of resemblance, recall continually, that the apostle favoured to receive the Revelation of Jesus Christ, was " that disciple whom Jesus loved," and of whom He said, " if I will that he tarry till I come, what is that to thee ? " Now, if we take the Revelation as a symbolic prophecy, predicting the fortunes of the Christian churcla throughout this dispensation, it is harmonious with all the rest. The strange outward material symbols are only signs ; the things signified are mighty spiritual realities ; the book is one grand contrast throughout ; it traces the long and deadly conflict between the Lamb and the' Beast, Br^plov and apvlov, and their respective armies, between the whore associated with the Beast, and the bride of the Lamb, the false and faithless church, and the true and faithful church. In spite of all the Jewish symbolism, lo8 PROGRESSIVE INTERPRETATION. (which is natural from the typical character of the Jewish economy, and the antitypical character of the Christian) the Jews and their fortunes, are scarcely glanced at in the book • which, starting from a period subsequent to the final destruction of Jerusalem, and to the dispersion of the Jews, occupies itself entirely, with the history of that church in which is neither Jew nor Gentile. The whole drama as it is enacted before us, recalls such words of John's earlier writings as, *' ye are from beneath, I am from above "; " ye seek to kill Me "; " ye are of your father the devil "; the time comcth that whosoever killeth you will think that he doeth God service "; " in the world ye shall have tribulation, but be of good cheer, I have overcome the world "; "O righteous Father, ///^ 7tvr/^ hath not known Thee, but //^a^ have known Thee"; "art Thou a king then? for this end was I born, and for this cause came I into the world"; "behold your king"; "he is antichrist that denietli the Father and the Son "; " the world passeth away "; " it is the last time "; " when He shall appear we shall be like Him ", " for this purpose was the Son of God manifested, that He might destroy the works of the devil "; " boldness in the day of judgment, because as He is so are we in this world "; "this is the victory that overcometh the world, even our faith "; "he that hath the Son hath life, and he that hath not the Son of God hath not life." These and many other thoughts, familiar to us from the gospel and epistles of John, shine out with their old lustre in their new surroundings ; reading Revelation as a symbolic prophecy, we feel that it is as characteristic of the soaring, eagle eyed, spiritual apostle, as any of his writings. But if it be a record of mere material wonders to happen after the Christian church has been removed to heaven, in connection with a future Jewish remnant, how singularly unlike is it, to anything John was ever inspired to \Vrite ! What a rude and incomprehensible contrast, would exist between this and all his other productions ! And finally tlie principle of progressive revelation, demands PROGRESSIVE INTERPRETATION. 109 that these visions should not be taken as literal predictions of a coming crisis at the end of the age. Other previous prophe- cies, had already brought down the chain of events to the destruction and fall of Jerusalem, and our Lord Himself in treating of it, passed on to the final crisis, of which it was a precursor. The one and only period, unillumined by prophetic light was i/ie church's history on earth. Our Lord had revealed little, save its general character as a time of tribulation ; the other apostles had foretold certain events which were to characterize its course ; it remained for the Revelation of Jesus Christ which God gave to Him, and which He now sends, as his last gift to the churches, to map it out in detail, and pre- sent in a mystic form, all its leading outlines. If the Apo- calypse merely went over again, the events of the final crisis, it would not be an advance on all previous revelation, as its place in the canon of Scripture warrants our concluding that it is. To be this, it must be a symbolical history of the Christian dispensation. CHAPTER III. THE APOCALYPSE IS A CONTINUOUS PROPHECY EXTENDING FROM ITS OWN TIME, TO THE CONSUMMATION OF ALL THINGS. — IM- PORTANCE OF HISTORICAL KNOWLEDGE, IN ORDER TO ITS CORRECT INTERPRETATION. — IT IS A PROPHECY CONCERNING THE EXPERIENCES OF THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH, IN THE WORLD, AND NOT CONCERNING THOSE OF THE JEWISH NATION. VERY serious are the consequences of a refusal to admit uniformly and consistently, this symbolic character of the visions of the Apocalypse. Like most errors it brings further error in its train, and renders almost impossible any advance in the comprehension of the book. It answers beforehand, independently of investigation, the question whether the pro- phecies of the Apocalypse are fulfilled or not. It stands to reason, that if these emblematic visions are read under the im- pression that these things are to come to pass literally, the conclusion that the book consists entirely of unfulfilled prophe- cies is inevitable, for most assuredly no such things ever have come to pass. Litcralists must therefore ht futurists, and the abandonment of the first error, is almost certain to lead to the abandonment of the Second. The moment we begin to translate the sym- bolic into ordinary language, the prediction assumes such a very different shape, that it is no longer a self-evident fact that it must be unfulfilled. The inquiry is on the contrary awakened, has this happened ? and wc turn to history for an answer. If a fulfilment have taken place, we shall then be on the road to discover it ; one such fulfilment clearly established will be a clue to others ; and every fulfilment so discovered, will be an argument for the truth of that system of interpretation which led to the discovery. PROGRESSIVE INTERPRETATION. iii Here we .are met by an objection ; some are found rash enough to condemn that system of interpretation which leads to the comparison of prophecy with history, on the ground that it does so. The sun, say they, requires no candle to show that it shines ; the Bible requires no light from history ; history is merely human ; we are told to search the Scriptures, but we are nowhere told to search Eusebius, or Gibbon, or Hallam. God is his own intrepreter ; He can explain his own word without human help ; history was not written in heaven, it is the wisdom of this world, foolishness with God, and so on. Now this reasoning, though often advanced in the most oracular way as if it settled the question, is shallow, and based on fallacies ; and yet, alas ! it misleads many, calculated as it is to flatter ignorance, to foster indolence, and to encourage dog- matism, by throwing the reins on the neck of imagination, which is by it left free, to invent future facts and fulfilments, as it lists. A little reflection will show the superficial nature of the objection. A knowledge of history is needful to the intelligent compre- hension of prophecy. The Bible itself contains a large amount of history, from which alone we learn the fulfilment of many of its earlier prophecies, and without which we might still be ex- pecting a fulfilment, which look place hundreds of years ago. What are the four gospels, and the book of Acts, but histories, divinely inspired histories of course, but under the point of view we are now considering, their inspiration is mainly important as securing their accuracy and authenticity. They are authentic records of a series of facts, which took place eighteen hundred years ago, in a distant land ; for a knowledge of which conse- quently we vitist be indebted to the testimony of others. By the help of such testimony we compare the facts that have occurred, with the predictions of prophecy, and perceive the marvellous and accurate fulfilment. Without such testimony we never could have done this ; and to be ignorant of the existence and nature of such testimony, is to be practically without it. But Bible history, while it begins with the firit Adam and the firbt 112 PROGRESSIVE INTERPRETATION. paradise, does not, like Bible prophecy, reach on to the coming of the Second Adam in glory to re-establish paradise on earth. It ends about a.d. 6o, and we have only uninspired though authentic records of all that has happened since. Now accord- ing to these objectors, we are not to make use of these ; not to compare New Testament prophecy witli profane history. Either then there must be absolutely no prophetic light thrown by the Holy Ghost on the last eighteen hundred years, or else God does not intend us to have the benefit of it. Supposing a fulfilment clear as daylight to have taken place, we must remain in igno- rance of it,- unless God were pleased now to add an appendix to the Bible, to record facts which many trustworthy historians have already recorded. Revelation never teaches things which common sense is sufticient to discover. For instance, a tenfold division of the Roman empire was predicted by Daniel, prior to the establishment of the kingdom of Christ on earth. The Roman empire was still existing in its integrity when John closed the canon of Scripture by his prophecy, which repeats the prediction. Blot out now all historical records, deprive the church of the help of all uninspired testimony, and Christians must to this day remain in ignorance of the solemnly momentous fact, that this prediction has been ful- filled during the last twelve hundred years, and the strong presumption to be derived therefrom that the coming of the Lord is nigh, even at the doors. Nor will it do to say, ah, but that is a notorious fact, evident to our senses without historical testimony. No : our knowledge of it depends upon uninspired testimony, historical or otherwise ; and the question is not, to what extent may we make use of uninspired records to elucidate inspired predictions, but, may we make use of them at all? The answer is clear, zue must, or for ever remain ignorant, whether the holy prophecies of the word of God regarding post canonical events, are fulfilled or not. A still more rash assertion is also made ; it is said that no events of this parenthetical church dispensation (save those of its closing crisis) are, or could be, subjects of prophecy. PROGRESSIVE INTERPRETATION. 113 That this statement is not true is proved by the above instance, and by many more that might be alleged. But it is evident that a knowledge of history is needful to warrant the statement ! How without such knowledge, can it be ascer- tained that the visions of Revelation for instance, do 7iot present a connected outline of the leading events between the past and future advents of Christ ? A knowledge of what has actually taken place is as needful to justify a denial, as an assertion of the fact. We must know a person as well before we can pronounce that a certain portrait does not resemble him, as in order to assert that it does. This prejudice against the use of history in the interpreta- tion of prophecy, seems frequently to be based on a confusion which is made, between the facts recorded by historians and the opinions of the historians who record them. Grant that the latter being merely human are worthless, the former are none the less important. Trustworthy historians record events which ///rj' neither invented nor caused, but which occurred under God's providential government ; it was He who caused or permitted these events ; they are in one sense as Divine, as prophecy ; that is, both proceed from Him. Prophecy is God telling us beforehand what shall happen ; authentic history is men teUing us what has, in the providence of God, taken place. In truth each is best understood in the light of the other ; the moral features of events, occupy the main place in the prophecy, so that by its study we learn to weigh things in God's balances, to judge of men and systems by a Divine standard. Eut the history also elucidates the prophecy ; when we see what has been allowed to occur in fulfilment of a prediction, we learn what was intended in the announcement, and understand the perhaps previously mysterious form, in which it was made. Apparent contradictions are reconciled, difficulties are re- moved, and we are filled with admiration and awe at the foreknowledge and wisdom evinced in predictions, over which the ignorant can only puzzle or speculate. Authentic history ought not to be deprecated as merely the wisdom of this I 114 PROGRESSIVE IXTERPRETATIOX. world ; it is something more, it is a record of God's pro- vidential government of the world. Besides it is vain and foolish to deny, that mental cultivation in general, an acquaint- ance with ancient languages and literature, with history and with science, are a help, in the understanding of Scripture and especially of prophetic Scripture. They are not needful to a spiritual apprehension of saving truth, thanks be to God, nor to growth in grace and in the experimental knowledge of the Lord, God can and does dispense with them, but He can and does also sanctify and use them, for the elucidation of his word. By themselves they are worthless, for they deal only with the letter; but, sanctified and used by the Holy Ghost, they are invaluable, as helping to explain the letter, in and through which we grasp the spirit. It is a strange estimate to form of the dignity of the in- spired book of the all-wise God, that those ignorant of his works in nature and providence, are as capable of understand- ing it, as those familiar with them. It is true that the un- learned Christian has, equally with the learned, the indwelling Spirit to guide him into all truth. But it is also true that he needs in addition ministry, human teaching; else why has Christ given teachers to his church ? Books are but wTitten ministry. Ignorance is an infirmity, an unavoidable one with many it is true, and one for which help is provided ; ' but it is as much an infirmity of the mind, as blindness or lameness is of the body. We blame not the blind and the lame for not seeing and walking, but we should blame them for refusing the help of those who possess the powers of which they are deprived. We blame not the ignorant for their ignorance when it is unavoidable ; but we should blame them for refusing assistance, and for glorying in that ignorance as a peculiar advantage. The ignorant Christian must be indebted to the learned in many ways ; but for the labour of such, he would indeed have no Bible ; for what could he learn from the original text? and if the translation put into his hands be defective, how but from the cnticisms of the learned, siiall he PROGRESSIVE IXTERPRETA TION. n; remedy the defect ? This is surely designed of God, and is one of the ways in which "the whole body, compacted to- gether by that which every joint supplieth, according to the efifectual working in the measure of every part, maketh in- crease of the body unto the edifying of itself in love." It is impossible to assign any reason, why the wisdom and knowledge derived from historical research, should not be made available, as well as every other kind of science, for the elucidation of Scripture. We dare not for these reasons exclude the light afiorded by history, in the endeavour to answer the questions sug- gested above, is the prophecy of the Apocalypse fulfilled or partly so, or is it still entirely iuifiilfilled ? and is it in its general scope Christian or Jewish? The two inquiries are so closely re- lated, that it is impossible to pursue them apart ; it is evident that if the Revelation be partially fulfilled, it is in the history of the Christian church we shall be able to trace the fulfilment, seeing the Jewish nation was already cast away, — "broken off" for a time, — before this prophecy was publislied ; and it is equally evident that if it relate to the future history of restored Israel, no fulfilment can have yet commenced, seeing Israel is still scattered, and Jerusalem trodden down of the Gentiles, We have therefore to ascertain from the internal evidence of the prophecy itself, and from the external evidence of analogy and history, the truth as to these two closely connected points. And first what says the Apocalypse of itself? To whom is it addressed ? This is a fair and fundamental question ; it is thus that we judge of the object and scope of the epistles of the New Testament, and of the " burdens " of the ancient prophets. The epistles are addressed "to the saints and to the faitliful in Christ Jesus," or "to the church" in such and such a place. Observing this, we argue, the Jews and the ungodly have no right to appropriate the contents of these letters; they are for believers in Christ alone ; confusion will result if unbelievers t;ike to themselves these Divine mcssa!:;es. The Ii6 PROGRESSIVE INTERPRETATION. argument applies with equal force to the Apocalypse. It is addressed to Christ's "servants," "to the seven churches of Asia." This is reiterated ; the expressions occur both at the opening and at the close, of the book. "The Lord God of the holy prophets sent his angel to show unto his servants things which must shortly be done." "I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things, in the churches^ On reading these distinct declarations, simple unsophisticated minds would surely conclude, that the Jews and unbelievers in general, have no more to do with this prophecy than they have with the Epistle to the Ephesians. They may possibly be alluded to in the one, as in the other, but it is not for them, it is not mainly concerned with them ; it is for us ; Christians alone were Christ's servants in the days of Domitian, when John saw and heard these things ; to Christians alone was it sent, the seven churches represented the %uhole church, the prophecy is for the Christian church, and they take the children's bread to give it to outsiders, who would rob the church of her Lord's last gift. It is no use to say, yes ! but though given to the church, it might still be a revelation of the counsels of God about others than herself It might; the Epistle to the Ephesians might have been a treatise on the state and prospects of the lost ten tribes, but it was not; the vision of Nebuchad- nezzar, might have been a vision of the restoration of Israel, but it was not ; the visions of Daniel might have been visions of the seven churches in Asia, but they ivcre not, nor was it likely that they would be, nor is it likely that the Lord Jesus in his last prophetic communication to his cherished church, from whom for eighteen hundred years He was to be hid- den, would have nothing more pressing, personal, and impor- tant to reveal to her, than the destiny of a future Jewish remnant, with which she has nothing in common, and the final judgments on a world, from wliicli she is already de- livered, and from which, according to this theory, she will have been previously removed. Did she need no guidance, no PROGRESSIVE INTERPRETATION. 117 comfort, no sustainment with the cordial of hope, for the years of earthly pilgrimage that lay before her ? True, He had before, revealed in broad outline the sufferings that awaited her, and the glories that should follow ; but had He, who knows the end from the beginning, and who foresaw all that has since happened, no further words of warning and of cheer for his long-to-be-tempted, and sorely-to-be-persecuted church ? Strange, that such an idea should find place in Christian hearts ! What ! shall our Lord be less kind and careful than an earthly friend or parent ? A father sends forth his young son into a world which he must face alone, into circumstances in which he cannot further communicate wath him for some years ; he foresees that the separation will be far longer than the lad conceives, that his son will be exposed to temptations and snares, into which he will be only too prone to fall, that he will meet a crafty, specious, dangerous, deadly foe, in the guise of a friend, and that he will have to undergo sufferings that will be hard for him to bear, before he regains the paternal roof. He puts a long prophetic letter into his hand as they part, with solemn, earnest, repeated, injunctions to him to read and mask its contents. In distant lands and dreadful difficulties, the son opens this letter, and finds— suited advice and encouragement ? helpful warning and direction ? Oh no ! but an elaborate description of what his father intends to do for his younger brother, after his own return home ! What should we say of the wisdom or tenderness of such a parent ? Do these interpreters indeed believe that God inspired this prophecy, and that Christ loves his churcli ? Farther, what does the Apocalypse say about its own scope, and about the time to which it refers ? Again the first verse of the book supplies a simple and direct answer. It was given to show to Christ's servants " tilings that must shortly come to pass" and the next verse urges the study of the book, on the ground that ''the time is at hattd." In the last chapter the angel speaks of these things as " things that must shortly be done," and commands John not to seal the sayings of the pro- 1 1 8 PROGRESSIVE IXTERPRE TA TION. phecy, for the same reason, " M^ time is at hand.''' These words may measure time by the thousand-years-to-a-day scale, may not mean "at hand" accordmg to human, but only according to Divine chronology. But it is not likely that this is the case, because in another closely related prophecy, we have expres- sions of aft exactly opposite character, which can be proved to measure' time by tlie oi-dinary standard. Daniel is twice or thrice told to shut up and seal certain parts of his prophecies, which related to events to take place in this dispensation, " even to the time of the end," because " the time appointed was great " and " the vision for many days." Now the most dis- tant of those events was near if measured by the Divine scale, distant only according to the common computation. If these cxpressio7is in Daniel are used in their merely human sense, we have every reason to suppose that it is the same with the similar expressions in Revelation. To Daniel, Christ said, " shut up the words and seal the book even to the time of the end," and to John, when these things had already begun to come to pass, the angel says, " seal not the sayings, for the time is at hand." It would not have been at hand in the ordinary sense, if the prophecy relates mainly to still, future events. We have every reason therefore to believe, that it relates, on the contrary, to events that began soon after the apostle received the revela- tion, and that the fulfilment has been in progress ever since. Another strong presumption that the visions of the Apocalypse form a continuous prophecy, stretching over the whole of this dispensation, exists in their analogy with the prophecies of Daniel. The resemblance between these two is marked and close ; both are in the symbolic language, both were given to aged saints who were greatly beloved, who were confessors and all but martyrs ; the " Man clothed in linen and girded witli the gold of Uphaz, whose face was as lightning, whose eyes were as fire, and whose voice was as the voice of a multitude," who addressed Daniel, on the banks of the Hiddekel, is un- questionably the same Divine Being who addressed John in Patmos. The prophecies were in both cases communicated PR0GRESS1\/R INTERPRETATION. iig when the temple was in ruins, and the Jews dispersed ; and both Daniel and John, had been trained in a school of pecu- liar experiences, to fit them to become recipients of these sacred revelations. We take then the symbolic prophecies of Daniel, as those likely to afford the most direct analogy to the symbolic prophecies of the Apocalypse, and we ask, do they date from contemporary events, or from a far distant future ? and do they present a continuous sketch of the interval they cover, or do they dwell exclusively on salient and distant crises ? The question scarcely 'needs a reply. The fourfold image seen by Nebuchadnezzar begins with the Babylonian monarchy of which he was the first great head. " Thou art this head of gold." It pursues its even course down through all the times of the Gentiles, and ends with the millennial kingdom of Christ. The second prophecy of Daniel, that of the four great beasts or empires, was given forty-nine years later, in the first year of Belshazzar, that is towards the end of Israel's captivity, when the days of Babylon's glory were fast drawing to a close, when the time was rapidly approaching for the kingdom to be num- bered, finished, divided, and given to others. Accordingly, while the first beast is still the Babylonian empire, the first particular noticed in the prophecy, is the plucking of the eagle's wings, on the lion's back. The prophecy thus starts from the diminished glory of the latter end of Babylon, rather than from the golden splendour of its commencement, that is, from contemporary events. It presents a second and fuller sketch of the political history of the Gentile world, (for the spiritual power, the little horn, is glanced at principally in its political aspects,) and traces the main features of the times of the Gentiles, down to the same point as its predecessor, the everlasting kingdom of the Most High. The third prophecy of Daniel, that of the ram and the hc- goat, with its four horns and its little horn, was given, as its opening states, in the third year of Belshazzar, two years later than the preceding prophecy. It oiJcns with the Mcdo-i'er- t20 PROGRESSIVE INTERPRETATION. sian empire, and the conquests of Cyrus. Now when this pro- phecy was given,. Cyrus had already been reigning seven years in Persia, and the rise of his universal empire was close at hand. It gives a continuous history of the Medo-Persian and Grecian empires, and of the Mohammedan politico-religious power, thus ranging from soon after its own date, to far on in the Christian era. The fourth prophecy of Daniel, that of the seventy weeks to elapse between the end of the captivity, and the coming of Messiah the Prince, began to be fulfilled about eighty years after it was delivered, when Artaxerxes gave the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem. But the decree of Cyrus, to restore and build the temple, and to liberate the Jews from captivity, was promulgated only two years after the date of this prophecy, and would no doubt be taken by the Jews at first, as marking the commencement of the seventy weeks. This pro- phecy includes a period of about five hundred years, and reaches from the restoration under Nehemiah to the final destruction of Jerusalem by Titus. Its object was less to indicate inter- vening events, than to measure the period up to the great rcent of human history ; the previous and the following prophecies, delineate the main outlines of the history of the period. And lastly the fifth and great closing prophecy of Daniel, given by our Lord Himself, and recorded in the uth and 12th chapters, begins tvith the date of the vision, "the third year of Cyrus king of Persia," and takes even a retrospective glance to the first year of Darius the ^Slede (chap. xi. i). It pre- dicts the succession of the Persian monarchs, condensing into one sentence the reigns of Cambyses, Smerdis, and Darius Hystaspes, down to the overthrow of the rich and mighty Xerxes, who stirred up all against the realm of Grecia. It traces next the history of the Ptolemies and of the Seleucida;, down to the desolations and persecutions of Antiochus Epiphanes , gives full detail of the career of the wilful king, and of the closing events of this dispensation, ending with the deliverance of Israel, and the resurrection of the just. It embraces thus a PROGRESSIVE INTERPRETATION. 121 period of at least 2400 years, and extends from the fall of the typtcai, to the fall of the antitypical Babylon ; so that ^//the historical prophecies of Daniel start from events close at hand vvhen they were given, and predict with varying degrees of fulness, a series of other events, to follow in regular sequence to the point at which they close. Now, judging by analogy, we should expect that when He who revealed to Daniel the things noted in the Scripture of truth, came six hundred years later, to reveal to John - things that must shortly come to pass/' He would follow the same method. -On opening the Apocalypse, this expectation is con- firmed ; we find that it starts, like all Daniel's prophecies, from the things that are," and that it ends like them, with the great consummation. In the nature of things, it could not go over all the ground of the older prophecies. Many of the events foretold by Daniel had already transpired. The three great empires had risen and fallen ; the fourth was then in its glory. Antiochus had desolated Judsa and defiled the temple ; Messiah had come, and had been cut off; Titus had destroyed Jerusalem. So much of the journey lay behind John in Patmos ; these facts were no longer themes for prophecy, but materials for history. Israel's fortunes were no longer the object of main interest, either to Him who was about to give this last of all prophecies, or to him who was about to receive it, or to those for whose sakes he was to write it. Blindness in part had happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles should be come in. The Apocalypse was not given in the sacred tongue of the Hebrews consequently, but in gentile Greek, just as Daniel's two earlier prophecies, which refer to the times of the Gentiles, without much allusion to Israel, are in gentile Chaldee. Taking these altered circumstances into account, what should we expect the last revelation granted to John in Patmos to contain ? Should we, judging by analogy, expect that, passing over in silence eighteen hundred years, crowded with events of deep interest, of stupendous importance to seventy or eighty generations of his saints, the Lord Jesur PROGRESSl VE INTERPRETA TION. would reveal through this Christian apostle, only the par- ticulars of a brief dosing crisis of earthly history, subsequent to the church's removal, and relating mainly to a future Jewish remnant ? Assuredly not ! We should expect this final prophecy, sent directly by Christ Himself to his church, through his most spiritually minded apostle, to contain an out- iinc of all that should befall that church, from the time then present, until the Lord's return, with perhaps brief indications of subse- quent a'cnts. A first perusal of the prophetic part of the book, gives the impression that our expectation is correct. We find a series of symbolic visions, and we observe a perceptible correspondence between some of them, and some of Daniel's, exactly as would be the case supposing these visions to traverse the same ground as his later ones. We find in the Apocalypse no beasts answering to Daniel's first three, but the fourth reappears very prominently with his ten horns ; we find no periods corresponding to the seventy weeks or the 2300 days, but the " time times and a half " is repeated in several forms, and in the same relative connection. We find in the closing visions, features that identify them with the final scenes of Daniel, and it is difficult to resist the conviction, that the intervening apocalyptic visions, must b e symbolic predictions of the moral and spiritual aspects, of all that has happened to the church of Christ, fro7n Johis day to the present time, and of all that shall happen^ to the close. But analogy furnishes a stronger argument still. "The Old Testament, when rightly understood," says Augustine, " is one great prophecy of the New." The records of the past are pregnant with the germs of a corresponding but more exalted future. The history of the seed of Abraham after the flesh, is, throughout, typical of the history of his seed by faith. The Lord's dealings with them, were types of his dealings with us ; for every fact in their history, some counterpart may be noted in our own ; our experiences are but a new edition, on a difter- eit scale, of theirs. Now under the old covenant, prophecy tnrew its light beforehand, on almost every event of importance PROGRESSl VE INTER PRE TA TION. 1 23 that happened to the nation of Israel, from the days of Abra- ham to the days of Christ, the fall of Jerusalem and its temple, the dispersion of the Jews, and the end of that age. The light of prophecy is a privilege, a blessing, a gift ; it is always so spoken of in Scripture ; '' He gave them prophets," " He gave gifts unto men, . . . apostles, prophets, evan- gelists, pastors, teachers"; and though Christianity possesses many higher privileges, and nobler gifts than Judaism, it lacks none of the real blessings of that earlier economy. We have exchanged many a shadow for substance, but lost no sub- stantial good. New Testament prophecy may therefore bo expected to throw its light, on every event of importance to. happen to the church of Christ, from the fall of Jerusalem to the second advent, that is, from the end of the Jewish, to the end of the Christian age. Among the events made subjects of prophecy in the Old Testament were the birth of Isaac, the rapid increase of Israel., the descent into Egypt, the sufferings of the Israelites under the Pharaohs, the duration of their bondage, the exodus, the xbrty years in the desert, the possession of Canaan, its very division among the tribes ; the characters of Saul, David, Solo- mon, and many other individuals ; the building of the temple, the division of the kingdom into two, the Assyrian invasion, and Israel's captivity ; the Babylonian invasion and the seventy years' captivity of Judah, the return from Babylon, the time to elapse, and many of the events to occur, between it and the coming of Messiah the Prince, his birth, character, true nature, ministry, sufferings, and death ; the ministry of John the Baptist, the rejection of Israel, the call of the Gentiles, and the destruction of Jerusalem under Titus. Was Israel ever left during a long period, full of momentous changes, and events of solemn national importance, without the light and guidance of prophecy? Is there in their history any " mighty unrepresented vacuum," of the occurrences of which we can say, great as are these events in human estimation, they are deemed unworthy of Divine notice in prophecy? If 124 PROGRESSIVE INTERrRLTATION such be tlie case there will be a distinct analogy, on which to base the theory, that the Apocalypse is still wholly unfulfilled. But such is not the case. The chain is almost unbroken, and though four hundred years elapsed between the last of the prophets and the coming of Messiah, Daniel's prophecy fills in the events of the interval, so that no gap of even a century occurs in the long series. Is it likely that there should be no analogy, but a perfect contrast, in the history of the antitypical Israel ? Has she no Egypt to leave and no wilderness to traverse, no land to inherit, no oppressors to tyrannize over her, no evil kings to mislead her, .no reformers and deliverers to arise, no Babylon to carry her captive, no temple to rebuild, no IMessiah to look for, no judgments to apprehend, no rest to inherit ? Are hers less im- portant than theirs? Are her foes so much more obvious, her dangers so much more patent, that it should be superfluous to supply her with prophetic light to detect them ? Because they were an earthly people, and sJic a heavenly church, is she therefore not on earth, and not amid the ungodly ? Are her enemies heavenly because the church is so ? Nay, but most earthly, for the wicked spirits against whom the church wrestles, wage their waffare incarnate in earthly, sensual, devilish systems, and in actual men, as did Satan in the serpent in Eden. Every conceivable reason would suggest her greater need of prophetic light. Now the Apocalypse is the book of the New Testament which answers to " the prophets " of the Old. If then it contain predictions of the first spread of Christianity, of the hosts of martyrs who sealed their testi- mony with their blood, during the ten pagan persecutions, of the reception of Christianity by Constantine and the Roman empire, of Jthe gradual growth of corruption in the church, of the irruptions of the Goths and Vandals, and the break up of the old Roman emjnre into ten kingdoms, of the rise and development of popery, of the rise and rapid conquests of Mohammedanism, of the long continued and tremendous sufferings of the church under papal persecutions, of the fifty PROGRESSIVE INTERPRETATION. millions of martyrs slain by the Romish Church, of the enormous political power attained by the popes, of their Satanic craft and wickedness, of the Reformation, of the gradual decay of the papal system and the extinction of the tem- poral power of the popes : if it contain predictions of these events, which ive know to have taken place in the history of the a7ititypical Israel, then we have a perfect analogy with the Old Testament. If on the other hand, the Apocalypse alludes to none of these events, but passing them all over in silence, gives only the history of an Antichrist who has not yet appeared, and of judgments not yet commenced, nor to be commenced until the church is in heaven, then instead of a striking scriptural analogy, we have a glaring and most un- accountable contrast. We say advisedly unaccountable, for none of the reasons assigned for this supposed contrast between Israel's experience and our own in this matter, are satisfactory. Their calling was an earthly one, ours is a heavenly one, it is true ; nevertheless our calling from heaven, and to heaven, leaves us still on earth. We have earthly connections and relations ; we are not of the world, but we are in the world. The acts of earthly monarchs and the changes of kingdoms and dynasties, affect the church even as they affected her Lord, in the days of his flesh. How came the prophecies "I called ray Son out of Egypt," and " He shall be called a Nazarene," to be accomplished ? What took the virgin mother to Bethlehem? Why was Paul left bound two whole years ? Secular political events have tlieir influence, their mighty influence, on the church, notwithstanding her heavenly calling, and may therefore well be revealed to her by the spirit of prophecy. It is evident there is nothing in the peculiarity of this dispensation, which precludes the church from receiving predictions, of specific events to take place during its course, because the epistles contain such predictions. The fact that the Holy Ghost has announced to the church, events reaching through the whole dispensation cannot be denied. " He who now letteth will let until he be taken out 126 PROGRnSSrVE INTERPRETATION. of the way ; and then shall that wicked be revealed, whom the T.ord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming." The hindering obstacle, whatever it was, was in existence when the apostle wTote, and was to continue in existence until another event took ])lace, the rise of the man of sin, and that wicked one was to continue till the Lord's coming. Here we have a prophecy the fulfilment of which, starting from its own date, reaches to the consummation, and covers the whole interval, leaving no room for a break. There is therefore no ground for asserting,' that the fulfil- ment of the Apocalypse must be future, because the church cannot be the subject of prophecies whose sphere is earth. If she may be the subject of one or two, she may equally well be the subject of a hundred, and the question must be decided on other grounds. If the first generation of Christians were forewarned of the fall of Jerusalem, we may be forewarned of the fall of Babylon. If they knew beforehand that Jerusalem was to be compassed about with armies, we may know that the power of Turkey is to decay. In prin- ciple there is no difference ; a dispensation that admits of the one, admits also of the other. The interpretation of this book which asserts a past historic fulfilment of the greater part of its mystic visions, is then in perfect harmony with strong scriptural analogies ; and the interpretation which asserts them all to be future and unful- filled, is in violent and unnatural opposition to all analogy and would require the strongest internal evidence to support it. But such internal evidence it can never receive, seeing it is a negative, and not a positive theory ; it denies the historic fulfilment, but substitutes no other that can be tested by its correspondence or otherwise with the terms of the prediction. Internal evidence in its favour is therefore impossible ; there is no analogy to support it ; and we are driven to the conclu- sion that it is untenable. The principal tejt, however, by wliich to determine the PROGRESSIVE INTERRRETATION. 127 period covered by this prophecy is a comparison with history. Can any series of events be indicated, which have transpired since the Christian era, which bear a sufficiently clear resem- blance to the symbolic visions of the Apocalypse, to justify the assertion, that the prophecy is for the most part a fulfilled one ? If so, candour would admit, that it settles the question. We firmly believe that such a fulfilment is clearly traceable. Yet as Jewish unbelief refuses to perceive that the character and mission, the life and death, of Jesus of Nazareth, fulfil the long series of Messianic predictions, so there may be a Christian unbelief, which refuses to perceive, that the events of the Christian era, answer to the predictions of this Christian prophecy. Yet if such a series of events have taken place, it ought not to be difficult to observe the resemblance between the history and the prophecy. It is not a question of minor details, but of events of stupendous magnitude, affecting a vast extent of the earth, and reaching through centuries of time. It is not a question of remote antiquity, nor of half explored, dimly known regions; no such difficulties encumber the problem. The things that have transpired in the Roman earth, since the days of Domitian, when the Apocalypse was written, especially those concerning the Christian church, both true and false, and those transpiring in our own day, are not things done in a corner, concerning which there may exist a great variety of opinions and of questions that can never be decided. On the contrary, we have records abundant and varied enough of the whole period, to enable us to live it over again in imagination ; and we have remams, and monuments, and present facts, which arc so linked with all that eventful past, that no ingenuity can distort or deny, any of its main features. The last eighteen hun- dred years, present no terra incognita to the historian ; exi:)lorers may not conjure up characters, or concoct transactions, to suit their taste; dates cannot be adapted to fit theories ; every error is sure to be detected, and every assertion sifted. Very narrow are the limits within which invention may act ; almost boundless 128 PROGRESSIVE INTERPRETATION. is the field for examination and research. This being the case, it must be not only possible, but easy, to recognise the fulfil- ment of the apocalyptic prophecies if it exist, provided only we are sufficiently acquainted with the facts of history, and rightly understand the predictions themselves. If a photograph of an extensive and varied landscape, be presented to a person familiar with the scene, he will not fail to recognise its main features ; he might not be immediately able to detect the miniature of his own homestead, amid the many similar to it, nor to identify every spire of the neighbouring city, and every little detail of the picture. But the more he studies it, the more he will see in it, and the microscope will enable him to identify objects, which one without a microscope and with less knowledge of the neighbourhood, would never notice. It is thus with a student of the Apocalypse who is familiar with history. Or, to reverse the simile ; one who has long being acquainted with a series of photographs, say of the Holy Land, who has pored over them with loving interest and impressed them deep in his memory, is transported to Palestine, and wanders amid those very scenes. He stands on the shores of a blue lake which reflects a snowy cone that rises far away to the north ; the level tops of a range of barren mountains stretch along the opposite shore ; a ruined, earthquake-shaken town and castle lie behind him ; and away to the south a river makes its way out of the lake. He needs no guide to tell him where he is ; he stops not to observe the details of the scene ; this combination of broad features so often noted in the photograph is enough : " Hermon," he exclaims " that exceed- ing high mountain apart ! Tiberias, solitary survivor of sister cities ! mountains of Bashan, river Jordan, I know ye all " ; and he would smile incredulously at any one who should say, " Well, in spite of the general resemblance, I question after all whether this is the sea of Galilee ! " It is thus with a student of history who is familiar with the Apocalypse. The remembered photograph serves to identify the real scene, as in the former case the well remembered PROGRESSIVE INTERPRETATION. 129 scene interpreted the picture ; if there be a resemblance it would be impossible that either could be known, and the other not recognised, if contemplated with sufficient care and attention. The reason that the resemblance is not more uniformly perceived, between the predictions of Revelation and the facts of history since the Christian era, must then lie, either in a want of thorough acquaintance with one or other, or else in a want of careful and unprejudiced attention to the correspond- ence between them. Those who have taken the Apocalypse literally, have of course little idea what it predicts when translated into unsymbolic language ; and history is too often contemplated, from the worldly political point of view in which it is generally written, for the resemblance between the Divine delineation of its facts, and the facts themselves, to be easily recognised. Besides this, a foregone conclusion that the book of Revela- tion is unfulfilled, prevents many from perceiving the proofs to the contrary. But we feel no hesitation in asserting, that a candid student, who admits the Apocalypse to be symbolic, and patiently endeavours by the help of other Scripture to translate its symbols, and who then proceeds to compare its predictions, with the authentic historical records of the Chris- tian era, will be driven to admit, that there is as clear a correspondence between the two, as between any other prophecy and its fulfilment. We cannot enlarge on this argument here ; to do it justice would be to give an exposition of the greater part of the book. The correspondence will be traced somewhat fully as to one or two of the visions, in the third part of this work ; and any force of truth therein perceived, must be allowed to lend its aid in deciding our present point, the general principles on which the book ought to be interpreted. We entreat the Futurist reader to remember, that it is possible for the plainest and most satis- factory fulfilment of a prophecy, to be forced on the attention, and yet be unperceived : witness the Jews in the days of Clirist; witness the disciples by the empty sepulchre. And yet i( K T30 PROGRESSIVE INTERPRETATION. a fulfilment of the Apocalypse has been accomplishing for more than seventeen hundred years, and if there remains very little now to be fulfilled, it is of viomentous interest to the cJnircJi of Christ that she should be aware of the fact. If in watching an exhibition of dissolving views we judge of the nearness of the conclusion, merely by the time that has elapsed since it began, we may have a vague impression that the end cannot be far off; but if we have held a programme of the proceedings in our hand all the time, and have ob- served that each scene appeared as announced, and that only the final one remains, we have a certainty that the end must he ch^se at hand, which is a very different state of mind. A Divine programme of the proceedings of this dispensation has been placed in our hands ; they who avail themselves of it, they who study it, and watch the dissolving views presented on the stage of history, know how many of the pre-appointed configurations have appeared, melted away, and been replaced by others ; they know the position on the programme of the one now on the stage, and they know what remains ! They lift np their heads, they know that their redemption draweth nigh, yea very, very nigh ! Nor are the claims of this principle of historical interpreta- tion in the least invalidated by the fact, that interpreters differ among themselves as to the precise apjjlication of some of the visions. Nearly all the writers of the first fifteen centuries of the Christian era, entertained the view that the Apocalypse was a comprehensive prophecy, reaching from the date of its publication to the end of all things, and endeavoured conse- quently to find its historical solution. It can be no wonder that, as the page of history has unrolled itself, greater accuracy should have been attained, than it was possible for early students to possess. At the time of the Reformation, and subsequently, the great body of commentators still interpreted the Apocalypse on the same principle, but naturally with a far closer approximation to the truth, though they were by no means unanimous in their expositions of detail ; and many are the . -J' points of controversy which still exist. But the essenli.^J agreement, more than counterbalances the minor diffe ne" i and^.t would be strange indeed if such differencef did 1 Prophetic interpretation is not milk for babes, but nlher strong meat for those that are of full age. and have hd sc s" exe csed by reason of use. But which of the very simple doctnnes of Scr.pture excludes controversy ? I, it an arZc „ agamst the true v.ew of the atonement, that numerous crr?™o„3 iJickersteth, Lirks, WooJhouc Keith II oT?' .^"""'"S^am, llabershon, tliese there are agreed a.s follow^ : ' ^'''°''' '''''^'y^^^ "^ all. Out of -. i. nat seal VI. is the fall ot pa-anism under Constantine ,? 3. TlKU tnmipets I to IV. are the Gothic hu'asion * ' 4- That tnimpet V. is the Saracens '-"' 5- That trumpet VI. is the Turks '7 6. "'''--'- -''••' - - • • 6. I ha the httle opened book refers to the Reformation ' ' ' I rt TT "• '^ ^'r P'?P^^ persecution of saiSts a" hcre'tic; o. Uett' r"'-.'V''' '^T'"'''''^ ^"^1 ''^'^'^^^^ from vi V of " the tiue church durmg the papal a^es o 9. That the beasts are aspects of the Papacy'. '. '^ 12. That chapter .wiii. is the Papacy. . ~^ 13. That a day is the symbol of a year ....'. ~ rcf^^^td^ ,^^^:;ar?;;n!:' 'JS a"" ^^^t ^="^ "^'-^^ ^^ ^^-P'^' sSv=,sslls£SEs3^ loicsaw the great infidcI rcvolut on, as the cirtlinml-r^ nf .i,« o Vi 132 PROGRESSIVE INTERPRETATIOX. and defective views exist ? Is there no revealed truth on the subject of church government, because such widely differ- ing creeds on the point prevail ? If we cannot see eye to . eye on such subjects as these, shall we marvel that differences >\ppear in the application of the symbolic visions of Revelation to history ? The multitude of the events predicted, their range and variety, the peculiar language in which they are foretold, the fact that they bear a strong testimony against existing cor- ruptions in the church, and consequently enlist the antagonism of all who uphold these corruptions, these things are quite suffi- cient to account for the measure of disagreement, which is found among interpreters, and which decreases in proportion as acquaintance with the subject increases, and as every fresh phase of contemporary history, adds its testimony to the pre- viously existing mass. But it is needful to notice one or two objections, com- monly advanced by a certain school of Futurist interpreters, who hold very strongly the parenthetical character of the pre- sent dispensation ; because they appear to have more weight than on examination they prove to possess. They settle the question as to the character of the Book of Revelation, in a summ.ary and apparently conclusive way, but in reality on superficial and unsubstantial grounds. The first is a sort of attempt to prove an alibi on behalf of the church : " the church cannot be in any way the subject of the prophetic visions of Revelation (chapter vi. — xix.) because she is already seen in heaven in the two previous chapters. All that happens after chapter v. is subsequent to the rapture of the church ; it must therefore refer to the Jewish remnant." "The church is never seen on earth, or anywhere but in heaven, from the end of chapter iii. till in chapter xix. Christ comes forth from heaven, and the armies which were in heaven follow in his train." * Fully admitting that the four-and-twenty elders and the cherubim of Revelation iv., v., include the church, we hold, * " Eight Lectures on Prophecy." W. T. 3rd edition, p. 192. PROGRESSIVE INTERPRETATION. 133 that it would be a sufficient answer to this objection to say, part of the church are seen in heaven, while part are still repre- sented as suffering on earth ; or to say " He hath raised us up together, and made us sit together, in heavenly places in Christ" even now, while we still groan, and fight, and toil, and die, on earth. But the chapters themselves supply a more conclusive answer. The church is not only seen in heaven, but she is seen taking part in the action of the beautiful introductory episode of this Divine drama. What is that action ? It is the taking and opening by the Lamb, of the seven sealed book. This action took place 7vhile John was an exile in Patmos ; for ever since, the mysteries hidden under those seven seals have been discovered and published to the world. Clearly the book is not now shut and sealed ; for we know its contents ; each seal covered or contained a vision, not be it observed the fnlfilment of a vision, but the vision itself. The visions were not seen till the seals were broken, and the seals were not broken till the Lamb took the book. But the visions were seen eighteen hundred years ago ; therefore the Lamb took the book and broke the seals thereof, eighteen hundred years ago ; that is, the scene i7i which the church is represented as taking part in heaven occurred eighteen huridrcd years ago. But the church was not actually in heaven eighteen hundred years ago, and therefore there is no ground for the assertion that the church mill be actually in heaven before tiie events symbolised in chapters vi. to xix. take place. The church was in heaven, in the only sense in which she will be there till the marriage of the Lamb shall come, when John was in Patmos. In other words the Apocalypse represents the church as mystic- ally in heaven, while still actually on earth, even as Ephcsians ii., Philippians iii., and other scriptures do. So, while we gladly grant to our Futurist brethren, that a portion of the church is represented as in heaven, in chapters iv., v., we ask them to grant with equal candour that a portion is represented on earth in the subsequent chapters. The one is just as evident as the other ; and to deny it is both to destroy 134 PROGRESSIVE L\'TERPRETATION. the dramatic unity so markedly stamped on this prophecy, and to obscure one of its grandest lessons. The prophecy is addressed, as we have seen, to Christ's servants and to the cJnirchcs ; the ascription of praise in chap. i. 5 is evidently Christian praise, it is the praise of those who have been loved by Jesus, and washed from their sins in his blood. John speaks of himself as the brother, and fellow sufferer of those to v/hom he wrote, and John was a Christian confessor, a prisoner of Jesus Christ in Patmos, as much as Paul had been in Rome. He says he was in exile "for the word of God, and for the testimony which he held," which expression therefore means Christianity. Under the fifth seal we catch a glimpse of a company ot martyrs who Avere slain '•' for the word of Cod and for the testimony which they held," that is, for con- fessing their Christian faith, like John; they were slain because they were Christians. White robes are given to them, and tliey are told to wait till another company of martyrs should be killed as they were, that is as Christians. In chapter vii. we have presented to us a company in heaven, unquestionably Christians also, for they are gathered out of every nation, kindred, and tongue, and they have washed their robes and made them white in the blood of the Lamb. In chapter viii. " the prayers of all saints " and " the prayers of the saints " are mentioned ; now prayer ascends from suppliants on earth, and "saints " in New Testament phraseology means CJiristians. We have no right in the last book of the New Testament to revert to an Old Testament signification of this word. Let the general tone of John's gospel and epistles be recalled, and his choice of tliis word to designate true Christians, in the midst of an ungodly world and falsely professing church, will be felt to be in beautiful harmony. What is the grand dis- tinction made in John's epistles between true Christians and those who are not ? It is holiness, saintship. " If wc say we have fellowship with Him, and walk in darkness, we lie and do not the truth ; but if we walk in the light, Ave have fellowship one with another, and the blood of Jesus Christ his Son clonnscth PROGRESSIVE INTERPRETA TIO.\. us from all sin." " These things write I unto you, that ye sin not," "Every one that docth righteousness is born of Him." " Every man that hath this hope in Him, purifieth himself even as He is pure." " Whosoever abideth in Him, sinneth not." " Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin." " In this the children of God are manifest, and the children of the devil : whosoever doeth not righteousness, is not of God." " This is the love of God, that we keep his commandments." " What- soever is born of God sinneth not." " We know that we are of God, and the whole world licth in wickedness." " He that doeth good is of God, but he that doeth evil hath not seen God." Such language shows that in the eyes of John, practical purity and holiness, samtlincss, is the grand characteristic ov Christians. When therefore we find hi//i, consistently desig- nating a certain body, by the distinctive appellation of "the saints," we conclude that those so called are true C/mstia7is, in opposition to the ungodly, or to false professors. Where does John, ever apply such a term to Jcics ? Where in the whole New Testament can the term be found so applied ? Why then should we assert that it is applied to Jews here? Paul uses it forty-three times, and in every case as a synonym for Christians. Luke uses it four times, in the Acts, and Jude twice in his epistle, in the same sense ; in fact only once is it used in any equivocal sense in the whole New Testament. (" r^Iany bodies of the saints which slept arose." ]\Iatt. xxvii. 52.) EesideSj we observe these " saints," who are thirteen times mentioned in the Apocalypse, doing and bearing exactly what we know from other scriptures, the saints of the Christian church must do and bear in this dispensation. We find them watch- ing, waiting, praying, enduring tribulation (chap. xiii. 10), re- sisting unto blood (chap. xvi. 6), resting in heaven (chap. xiv. 12, 13), and at last manifested as tlie bride of Christ, and as the "armies which were in heaven," clad under both emblems with the '• fine linen clean and white, which is the righteousness oi saints" ; we find them associated with the martyrs oi Jesus, (chap. xvii. 6), a clear proof that they cannot be Jewish saints. 136 PROGRESSIVE INTERPRETATION. In short, so far from the church being actually and exclu- sively in heaven, at the commencement of the prophetic drama of this book, she is scat on earth during its entire course. She is seen collectively under various symbols, such as the one hun- dred and forty-four thousand, the two witnesses, the sun-clad woman, the armies of heaven, the New Jerusalem ; and her members are seen severally as " the saints." They are seen first in their sufferings, and then in their glory; first slain for Jesus' sake, then enthroned beside Him. Can it be questioned that the saints who pray, and wait, and suffer, and die as martyrs of Jesus, are the same saints, the " called, and chosen, and faithful," who are seen with the Lamb afterwards, as his bride, and as his white-robed followers ? If they are not, the unity of the book is gone, it becomes an incomprehensible confusion. If the saints who form the bride of the Lamb in chap, xix., are not the saints who in the previous chapters witnessed for Him in life and in death, then the lesson written most legibly on the pages of the prophecy, — the lesson that, in spite of ignorance and obscurity, the church in all ages has learned from it, — the truth that sustained millions of martyrs in their protracted sufferings and cheered them in their dying agonies, — the truth with which this prophecy seems instinct, " If we suffer, WE SHALL ALSO REIGN WITH HiM," is Utterly obliterated from its pages ! The suffering "saints" get no reward; and the happy, blessed bride, rises not from a surging sea of sorrow and suffering, to the joy of her Lord's embrace and the glory of his throne. One of the great morals of the book is gone, as well as its dramatic itnity. The exigences of a false system alone could suggest such a wresting of Scripture as this. This systc'jn of interpretation, involves besides, a logical in- consistency. The bride is the Christian church ; her raiment idejitifics her with the previously mentioned "saints," and the "saints " are — a Jewish remnant !* This is as if we should say : * Tlie future existence of a Jewish remnant is not denied, though their history and experiences are mapped out by a certain school of prophetic PROGRESSIVE INTERPRETATION. 137 the army is composed oi soldiers, iheywesLr uniforms; whenever you meet men in uniform they are — civi/ia/is / Surely they who teach thus should be ashamed for not rightly dividing the word of truth. " Be not carried about with divers and strange doctrines," is an exhortation we have need to remember. Let simple minded saints be reassured, and fear not to claim and appropriate, their divinely bestowed name ! The only way of avoiding the force of this argument is, to deny that the bride of the Lamb is the church ; for it is evident that the bride is identical with the saints, and it is evident also that the saints are on earth, during the whole course of the book. Those who are resolved to prove that the church is nof repre- sented as on earth in these visions, must therefore not only deny that the saints are the church, but seeing the saints are identical with the bride, must also de/ij that the bride is the church. It is a painful and humiliating illustration, of the length to which the desire to uphold a favourite theory, will carry Christ- ian men, that many Futurists are to be found, who actually do deny this, and even glory in their shame in so doing, as if this departure from one of the first principles of Christ, were an attainment of advanced truth ! The bride of Christ a Jewish remnant ! ! It is then of the Jewish remnant that the apostle Paul speaks in Ephesians v, ; it is of the Jewish remnant that Eve, and Rebecca, and Rachel, and Asenath, and Zipporah, and Ruth, and Pharaoh's daughter are types! It is of a Jewish remnant that Paul says, "I have espoused you as a chaste virgin to Christ ! " Even so. " The bride is not the figure of nearest associa- interpreters, far more definitely than by the word of God. That the rem- nant or remainder of the Jewish nation, will be restored to Palestine before the millennium, brought there into great trouble, and prepared by it to say, " Blessed is He that cometh in the name of the Lord," that Christ will appear for their deliverance, and that they will be converted at the sight of Him, this much seems clear from Scripture. The gifts and calling of God are without repentance, and He has not cast away his people whom He foreknew. 138 PROGRESSIVE INTERPRET Al ION. tion," say our accurate Futurist friends ; " the body is still nearer." "The church is his body, the fulness of Him that filleth all in all." True! but have ye not read, " he that loveth his 7uife loveth himself" ? in a sense the bride is the body, and the body is the bride. The figures are twain, the truth is one. Such is the union, that Christ and his church are separate existences, as are bridegroom and bride ; such also is the union, that Christ and his church are one, as is the body with the head. " He that is joined to the Lord is one spirit " ; " because I live, ye shall live also." Let any one read Ephesians i. and v., and say is it not making a distinction without a difference, to assert that the bride and the body do not represent the same reality. Let it be granted then that, fulfilling all these types from Eden downwards, and realizing all the figures of most intimate association and union which language can convey, — the vine and the branches, the head and the members, the bridegroom and the bride, — the white robed saintly bride of Revelation xix. is the church of the redeemed ; and we claim that with- out all contradiction, the church is on earth during the ACTION ofthe Apocalypse, AND that therefore the Apoca- lypse IS a Christian prophecy, fulfilled in the events OF the Christian Era. End of Taut H. PART III. FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. CHAPTER I. THE PROPHECIES OF " EADYLOX," AND " THE LEAST." — REA- SONS FOR THE EXAMINATION OF THESE TWO PROPHECIES. FUNDAMENTAL, DIVINELY INTERPRETED ; PRACTICALLY IM- PORTANT. — BABYLON THE GRE.\T REPRESENTS THE APOS- TATE CHURCH OF RO.AIE. THE scope of this work, prevents our attempting to enter into a detailed, examination, of the symbols of the Apo- calypse. The book itself, as v/e have seen, interprets some of them, and other parts of Scripture interpret others. It would ' not be difficult to form a tolerably complete dictionary, of the meaning ot the Apocalyptic symbols, by placing over-against each, passages of Scripture in which the same symbol is em- ployed in contexts which indicate its meaning ; or in historical narratives, ceremonial observances, or legal enactments, which . throw light upon it. To search the Scriptures, is to find the •' solution of many a difficulty in this book, for it is more closely related to the rest of the Bible, than would by superficial readers be supposed. We proceed, however, briefly to examine, two of the leading prophecies of the Revelation, a clear understanding of which, is ot itself, sufficient to determine its whole scope and charac- ter. They are two of the most important symbolisations in the entire series, they occupy several whole chapters, and are alluded to in others ; they are closely related to each other, and one of them is divinely intapxfcJ. This is the vision of 140 FORETOLD AND FULFILLED Babylon the Great, in the seventeenth chapter of the book, a prophecy which by its synchronical connection with almost all the other predictions of the Apocalypse, furnishes a most valuable clue to the meaning and application of the whole series of visions. This prophecy has besides a solemn practical importance, rendering it peculiarly needful that it should be rightly interpreted. Immediately prior to the fall of Babylon, described in the iSth chapter of Revelation, a voice from heaven cries, " Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, that ye receive not of her plagues ; for her sins have reached unto heaven, and God hath remembered her iniquities." Is it not all-important that Christian people, should be very clear, as to the system thus solemnly denounced by a voice from heaven ? And similarly, immediately after the fall of Babylon, ** a great voice as of much people in heaven," is heard saying, with reference to it, "Alleluia; Salvation, and glor)', and honour, and power, unto the Lord our God : for true and righteous are his judgments: for He hath judged the great whore, which did corrupt the earth with her fornication, and hath avenged the blood of his servants at her hand. And again they said, Alleluia. And her smoke rose up for ever and ever." If this symbol represents an evil so gigantic, that heaven itself is moved to psalms of praise, on the occasion of its overthrow, should not the church on earth be anxious to recognise it, and to avoid all connection with it ? The deep depravity attributed to " Babylon the Great," the peculiarly solemn adjuration to God's people to come out of her, and the utter and awful destruction denounced against lier, all combine to attach great practical importance to the inquiry, what system is intoidcd by this symbol i A perusal of the 17th and i8th chapters of the Book of Revelation, shows that "Babylon the Great" represents a system which should last long, exert a subtle and extensive influence, and be guilty of exceeding iniquity and cruelty. This svstem must still be in existence, seeing its destruction FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. 141 takes place, simultaneously with " the marriage of the Lamb," an event which we know to be, still future ; and seeing also that up to the moment of its destruction, or very nearly so, children of God will be found, more or less closely connected with it, so that a need will exist, for the urgent call, " Come out of her, my people" This system is prefigured as a cruelly persecuting one, as one that would "■ shed the blood of saints, and martyrs of Jesus," one on whom the Lord God would ** avenge the blood of his servants." The Lord Jesus Christ, who loves his church, foreseeing the existence and career of this terrible system, forewarned, and thus fore-armed her by this prophecy. He furnishes her with abundant marks whereby the foe may be recognised, and solemnly warns her against making any truce or compromise, while He stimulates and encourages her for the long and bitter conflict, by a view of the final result. He would have his people in no perplexity or doubt on so momentous a question, so He has made this prediction peculiarly clear ; has placed it in marked and intentional con- trast with another prophecy, which makes its meaning still clearer ; and He has added besides, an explanation which leaves no room for the candid student to err. Let the reader note the contrasted features of the two sym- bolic prefigurations. "The WHORE that sitteth "The bride, the Lamb's upon many waters." wife." "Babylon the Great." "The Holy Jerusalem." " There came one of the " There came unto me one seven angels which had the of the seven angels which had seven vials, and talked with the seven vials full of the me, saying. Come hither ; I seven last plagues, and talked will show unto thee the judg- with me, saying, Come hither, ment of the great whore I will show thee the bride, that sitteth upon many the Lamb's wife, waters. 143 FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. " So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilder- ness : and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns. " And he carried me away in the spirit to a great and high mountain, and showed me," (the bride, the Lamb's wife, under another symbol). (Rev. xxi.) "And the woman was ar- rayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abomi- nations and filthiness of her fornication. And upon her forehead was a name writ- ten, Mystery, Baevlon the Gkeat, the mother of harlots and abominations of the earth. " And I saw the v/oman drunken with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus '' (Rev. xvii. 1-6). "To her was granted that she should be arrayed in fine linen, clean and white : for the fine linen is the righteousness of saints " (Rev. xix. S). This Bride is described as "The Holy Jerusalem, de- scending out of heaven from God, having the glory of God : and her light like unto a stone most precious" (Rev. xxi.). The dragon "persecuted the woman," and " the dragon was wrath with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the command- ments of God and have the testimony of Jesus Christ" (Rev. xii. 13-17). As to Babylon, John adds, "when I saw her, I wondered with great admiration. And the angel said unto me, Where- fore didst thou marvel ? / luill tell fhcc the mystery of the 70oman. . , . The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sillclli. The waters, are iicoplcs, and multi- 1^0 RETOLD AXD FULFILLED. 143 tudes, and nations, and tongues. . . . And the woman which thou sawest is that great city, which reigneth over the kings of the earth " (Rev. xvii, 7). These prophecies present, two broadly contrasted women, identified with two broadly contrasted cities, one reality being in each case, doubly represented, as a woman, and as a city ; the harlot and Babylon are one ; the bride and the heavenly Jerusalem are one. It is evident that the true interpretation of either of these double prefigurations, must afford a clue to the true interpreta- tion of the other. The two women are contrasted in every particular that is mentioned about them ; the one is pure as purity itself, "made ready" and fit for heaven's unsullied holiness: the other, foul as corruption could make her, fit only for the fires of destruction. The one belongs to the Lamb, who loves her as the bride- groom loves the bride ; the other is associated with a wild beast, and with the kings of the earth, who ultimately hate and destroy her. The one is clothed with fine linen, and in another place is said to be clothed with the sun, and crowned with a coronet of stars ; that is, robed in Divine righteousness, and resplendent with heavenly glory ; the other, is attired in scarlet and gold, in jewels and pearls, gorgeous indeed but with earthly splen- dour only. The one is represented as a chaste virgin, espoused to Christ, the other is mother of harlots and abominations of the earth. The one is persecuted, pressed hard by the dragon, driven into the wilderness, and well-nigh overwhelmed ; the other is drunken with martyr blood, and seated on a beast which has received its power from the persecuting dragon. The one sojourns in solitude in the wilderness, the other reigns "in the wilderness" over peoples and nations and kindreds and tongues. 144 FORETOLD AXD FULFILLED. The one goes in with the Lamb' to the marriage supper, amid the glad hallelujahs of heaven ; the other is stripped, insulted, torn, and destroyed, by her guilty paramours. We lose sight of the bride, amid the effulgence of heavenly glory and joy, and of the harlot amid the gloom and darkness, of the smoke that " rose up for ever and ever," It is impossible to find in Scripture, a contrast more marked ; and the conclusion is irresistible, that whatever the one may represent, the other must prefigure its opposite. They are not two disconnected visions, but a pair — a pair associated, not by likeness, but by contrast. Now Scripture leaves us in no doubt, as to the signification of the emblematic bride, the Lamb's wife, the heavenly Jeru- salem. We read, " Husband, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave Himself for it ; that He might sanctify and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word, that He might present it to Himself a glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing ; but that it should be holy and without blemish." " For we are members of his body, of his flesh, and of his bones." The purpose of Christ's love, as regards his blood-bought church, is, that she should be with Him, and be one with Him for ever ; that she should behold and share his glory, being perfectly conformed to his image. Here m prophetic vision, we see this blessed design accomplished, and the complete and perfectly sanctified church, clad in spotless robes of righteousness, brought to the marriage supper of the Lamb. We see her persecuted like her Lord, and like her Lord and with her Lord, glorified. Beyond all question, the New Jerusalem bride represents the true church of Christ. What then must tlie contrasted symbol, the Babylonian harlot represent ? Surdy some false and apostate church, some church which, while professing to belong to Christ, is in reality given up to fellowship with the world, and linked in closes) union, with the kings of the earth ; a worldly church, which hag left her first love, forgotten her heavenly calling, sunk into FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. 145 carnality and sin, and proved shamelessly and glaringly faith- less to her Lord. Be it observed, that these symbols, a woman and a city, prefigure definite systems, corporate bodies, not merely a multitude of similar, but disconnected individuals. The tares of a wheat-field, the bad fish in the net, may represent such ; but here we have neither true Christians nor worldly pro- fessors, as individuals., but two corporations, two definite bodies. The true church of Christ is a body ; its members are united in the closest union to their Head and to each other ; one life animates them : " because I live, ye shall live also ; " one spirit dwells in them, they are one habitation of God. The link that unites them is however a spiritual one ; the body, is consequently invisible as such. A false church can have no such spiritual link. The bond that unites // must therefore be carnal, outward, visible ; the church represented by Babylon, must be a visible church, an earthly corporation, and as such capable of being discerned and recognised. Nor can the symbol comprise all false and faithless churches : to the harlot is expressly assigned a local connection — the woman and the city are one — if we can discover the name of the city, we shall be able to identify the church intended. The last words of the angel to John, seem to leave no possibility of mistake as to the city. " The seven heads are seven mountains on which the woman sitteth . . . and the woman which thou sawest is that great city which rcigncth aver the kings of the earth.'" What city was that? There was but one great city, which in John's day reigned over the kings of the earth. It was Rome; and Rome is the only city which ivas great then, has been great, in one way or other, ever since, and is so still. And Rome was seated on seven hills, " the seven mountains on which the woman sitteth." Her commoi; name with the classic writers of St. John's age, is " the seven hilled city ;" an annual festival used to be held in honour ot the " seven hilled city ;" every Latin poet of note during a period of five hundred years, alludes to Rome's seven hills 3 1^6 FORETOLD AXD FULFILLED. their names were the Palatine, the Quirinal, the A\entine, ihe CxUan, the Viminal, the EsquiUne, and the Janiculum hills. The medals and coins of the day, represent Rome as a woman sitting on seven hills ; and her titles show with sufficient clear- ness, how thoroughly she rd"/^//^^. She was styled "the royal Jvonie ;" " the mistress of the world ;" " the cpeen of nations." Her sway was all but universal. She Avas the metropolis ot that fourth great empire which Daniel had foretold would break in pieces and subdue all things, "dreadful and terrible and strong exceedingly ■" and at the time of the Apocalyptic visions, her power was at its height. Rome, and no other city can be intended here ; the woman is in some way identified with Rome. We previously saw that she must represent a church, now we know what church. The harlot is the Church of Rome ; for simple minds there seems no escape from this conclusion. And it is a singular and notable fact, that no other city but Rome, has ever given its name to a church, which has embraced many kindreds and nations. Many coimirics have done so, and even individuals ; but as far as we are aware, no other city. We have the Greek Church, the Armenian and the Coptic Churches, the Lutheran Church, the Protestant Churches of various countries, the English Church, the Scotch Church, etc. ; but the papal system is styled, not so much the Latin Church, as the Church of Rome. " The woman which thou sawest is that great city " (not empire or country) "which reigneth over the kings of the earth." The question, however, naturally suggests itself, If the woman be identified in some way with Rome, why is her brow emblazoned v/ith the name of Badvlon ? The answer is evident ; the Apocalypse is a book of mysteries ; things are represented by signs ; realities are veiled ; and it would have been altogether inconsistent v.-ith the whole style of this prophecy to have written Rome on the harlot's brow. The woman is a figure of a church, a corrupt idolatrous church ; that ]% the symbol seen by John was suggestive of something widel" different from itself; so the name with which that FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. 147 symbol was stamped, was also suggestive of something widely different from itself, though mysteriously similar. The harlot is " Mystery, Babylon the Great." That the liieral Babylon was not intended, is perfectly clear, since that city was neither built on seven hills, nor reigning over the kings of the earth, in John's day. But that the literal Babylon was a most appropriate symbol for Rome, is equally evident. Analogies of the most remarkable kind, geographical, historical, and moral, existed, which fully account for the selection. Both were situated in the midst of vast plains, both largely built of brick made out of their own soil, the one had been Queen of the East, the other was then Queen of the West, Babylon of old had called herself " the golden city,''' " the beauty of the Chaldees' excellency," and claimed eternity as well as uni- versal supremacy. (Isa. xiv. 4-7.) Rome similarly styled herself " the eternal city," "the mistress of the world." But especially, both had been employed by God, as scourges for the guilty city of Jerusalem and people of Israel ; and to each in its turn, had the sacred vessels of the Temple been carried as spoil ; Belshazzar abused them at his banquet, and Titus engraved them on his arch. Even had the plan of the Apocalypse not demanded it, cir- cumstances would have rendered it needful, for St. John to use a mysterious designation, in speaking as he here does of Rome. It would not have been safe in the days of Nero and Domitian, to expose the corruption, and predict the dcFvnfall and utter overthrow, of their capital. Persecution was already bitter 'enough, as St. John was experiencing in Patmos \ and rcsa've on such a subject was evidently needful. But in spite of reserve and mystery, the true meaning of this symbolic name "Babylon," was early perceived by the Christians, and divined even by their enemies. Irenreus, who v.'as a disciple of Poly- carp, who was a disciple of John himself, says, that " Babylon " in the Apocalypse signifies Rome ; and Tertullian says, " namci are employed by us as signs, Samaria is a sign of idolatry . . . Babvlon is a ligure of tb.c R(nn:^n city, miglily. proud U8 FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. of its sway, and fiercely persecuting the saints." So Jerome and others, in unbroken sequence, to the present day. When accused by their heathen Roman adversaries of holding sacred, predictions of the downfall of Rome, the early Christians never denied the charge, but merely replied, that they were far from desiring that downfall, since, little as Rome favoured Chris- tianity, the Antichrist whom they expected immediately to succeed, would do so still less. Babvlox, then, in this prophecy means Rome ; even Roman Catholic writers are constrained to admit this. Bellarmine and Bossuet do not attempt to deny that these predictions concern Rome. They admit it freely, but assert that they refer to Rome as a heathen city merely, and not as a Christian church ; and they maintain that the prophecy of the fall of Babylon, was fulfilled in the destruction of Rome, by the Goths, in the fifth century. " Babylon," say they, is Rome Pagan, not Rome Fapal ; and they defend this position with considerable skill, and some show of reason. This interpretation originated with Bossuet in the i6th century; till that time it had never been supposed by any expositor, that the fall of Rome under Alaric, exhausted the prediction about the fall of Babylon. But as soon as the Protestant application of this prophecy to the Church of Rome, was felt to be a tremendous weapon against that church, its advocates were driven in self-defence, to find some interpretation which should turn its edge. It must not be supposed, however, that the interpretation now called Protestant, originated out of the party feeling and antagonism produced by the Reformation. On the contrary, the view that Babylon meant the Church of Rome, was held long prior to the Reformation, and may be said, to some extent, to have produced it. As soon as the Church of Rome began to put forth her unscriptural claims, and to teach authoritatively her unscriptural doctrines, so soon did the faithful begin to recognise her, as the predicted Babylon of the Apocalypse. The earliest fathers of the church, who lived while Rome was Pagan, could not, of course, hold such a view. FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. 149 Little did they dream that Rome, the persecuting pagan city, would ever become the seat and centre of a Christian church. Nor could this application of the prophecy arise, while Rome remained a faithful and pure Christian church; but at the close of the 6th century, Pope Gregory the First made a strong protest against the assumption of the title of " universal bishop.''' He went so far as to assert that " the first bishop who should assume it, would thereby deserve the name of Anti- christ." From that time to the present day, the testimony that the Church of Rome is Babylon, has never been dropped; and though, through all the middle ages, this view was held at great risk, and peril, we can trace an unbroken succession of witnesses, each one bolder and more decided than the last, up to the time when Luther and the Reformers sounded aloud over Europe the trumpet-call, " Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues." The argument, therefore, that the Protestant interpretation is a modern innovation, unknown to the first fathers of the Christian church, is valueless. We must now briefly examine the considerations which prove it to be the true view. And first, seeing the rise, pretensions, persecutions, domina- tion, and decay, of the Papal Church, have been beyond all controversy the greatest and most important facts in chtirch history, is it not incredible, that the prophecy intended to guide and sustain the church all through its course, should not allude to these facts, or even glance at the existence of this church ? And yet, if Babylon be not the Papal Church, we must agree with Bossuet, that that church is 7iot so much as 7nentioned in the whole Apocalypse. And wherefore should so elaborate a prophecy, have been given about the character and doom of Rome Pagan, which was sacked by Alaric a.d. 410? Was it for a brief period of about 300 years only, that tlie Apocalypse was to aflbrd guidance, support, and instruction to the church? Even admitting this improbability, what were the few, who in this FORETOLD AXD FULFILLED, case were alone to benefit by the prophecy to learn from it? To shun heathen idolatry ? Not to bow down to the many gods of the Pantheon? Not to burn incense to Jupiter? But it did not need the Apocalypse to teach them that. Surely the martyrs who died in multitudes before this last prophecy was given to the church, had learned that lesson without its aid ! The early Christians were in no danger of relapsing into heathen idolatry ; but a Christian idolatry was to arise ; Anti- christ was to sit on the throne of Christ, in God's temple ; a fearful apostasy was to take place in the church itself; it was an object well worthy of Divine inspiration, to indicate tliis nczu and specious form of evil, which, rising slowly and imper- ceptibly, was destined to attain such gigantic proportions, and to endure for more than a thousand years. But there are statements in the prophecy itself, which entirely preclude its application to Pagan Rome, and its Gothic destruc- tion. This harlot city, Babylon, rules and rides upon the Roman beast in its ten horned state. Now the ten crowned horns, or ten kingdoms, of the Roman empire, did not make their appear- ance until after the barbarian eruptions, and the sack of Rome by Alaric. Rome Papal, on the other hand, rose into power simultaneously with these ten kingdoms, who " gave their power and strength " to her. Rome Papal ruled rulers, who voluntarily submitted to her authority, as is here predicted. Rome Pagan never did any such thing, she put down all kings, and ruled over them against their 7L'ill. When did ten kingdoms agree to give their power to Imperial Rome? Never! To Papal Rome? T/ironghoiit the dark ages ! By her alluring devices, she obtained their tuilling subjection, and she still claims it as her due. To every Pontiff who assumes the tiara she says, " Know thyself to be the father of kings and princes, the ruler of the world." The prophecy further represents, that the harlot shall ulti- mately be destroyed by the ten kingdoms which had previously supported her. The destruction of Rome Pagan was not bj old friends, but by new enemies, who had never been in sub- jection to it, and cannot therefore be regarded as a fulfilment of this prophecy. FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. A further proof is found, in the condition to which Babylon is, as represented here, reduced by her overthrow. She be- comes " the liabitation of devils, the hold of every foul spirit, and the cage of every unclean and hateful bird." Now if the fall of Babylon be the sack of Rome by Alaric, this suhscqjtcni condition must denote the state of Koine C/n-isiian, a portrait Roman Catholics will hardly care to appropriate. It is added, that Babylon is to be burnt with fire and become utterly deso- late, and that she is to be plunged like a great millstone into the sea. But neither of these prophecies were fulfilled, in the Gothic destruction of Rome, and they must therefore be still unfulfilled ; in other words, their fulfilment must occur, in connection with Rome Papal, and not with Rome Pagan. St. John saw this Babylonian harlot in a state of intoxication, " drunken with the blood of saints, and of the martyrs of Jesus ;'' at which he says he " wondered with great admiration." This is a proof that Jie did not conceive the symbol to \>xq\\<^\\xq. hcatJicji Rome. It could have caused him no astonishment that the heathen city should persecute Christianity. He was painfully familiar with that characteristic of the Roman Empire, having seen thousands of his fellow-Christians martyred, and been all but a martyr himself. But that Rome should not only become a Christian church, but, being such, should be also a bitterer persecutor of Christians, than ever heathen Rome had been, this was indeed astonishing, and John might well wonder ! That the Church of Rome deserves pre-eminently to be stigmatized as " drunk with the blood of saints," cannot be disputed. What other church ever established an Inquisition, instigated a St. Bartholomew, and gloried in her shame in having done so? What other Christian church has slain yf//j' millions of Christians for no crime hut Christianity, as she lias done? The Babylonian harlot is represented as enthroned upon many waters, which are nations and peoples. She is not only a church, but a church rulin^^ nations; that is, she claims a temporal as v/cU as a spiritual sway. She governs the beast 152 FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. and his ten horns ; and so unites a civil and a rehgious supre- macy. Now this is one of the most striking characteristics of the Church of Rome, and of that church only. Other churches may be so united to the State, that the State assumes the un- lawful right to govern ihcin ; but no other church assumes the right to govern the State, yea, and all States, and to make all men her subjects. Rome did this, and does so still, even in her decrepitude and decay. She claims two swords, she holds two keys, she crowns her Pontiff with two crowns, the one a mitre of universal bishopric ; the other, a tiara of universal dominion. " There is indeed a mystery on the forehead of the Church of Rome, in the union of these tivo supremacies ; and it has often proved a 7nystery of iniquity. It has made the holiest mysteries subservient to the worst passions ; it has excited re- bellion on the plea of religion ; it has interdicted the last spiritual consolations to the dying, and Christian interment to the dead, for the sake of revenge, or from the lust of power. It has for- bidden to marry, and yet has licensed the unholiest marriages. It has professed friendship for kings, and has invoked blessings on regicides and usurpers. It has transformed the anniversary of the institution of the Lord's Supper, into a season of male- diction, . . . and fulminated curses according to its will. Pius IX., in the year 1S48, addressed the people of Rome thus, " It is one of the many great blessings which God has lavished on Italy, that mir three millions of subjects should have two hundred milliotis of brother subjects of ei^ery language and nation!^ So that to the present day, Rome, by her extravagant and guilty claims, does all in her power to identify herself with the harlot of the Apocalypse, who sits upon many waters, which are peoples, and multitudes, and nations, and tongues." The title emblazoned on the brow of this mystic woman, is not only "Babylon the great"; but " mother of harlots and ABOMINATIONS of the earth." This word ^^ abomi/tations" designates, as is well known, idols. * The literal ancient * Sec IIyslop'5 " Two Babylons." FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. ,53 Babylon, was the mother of ahiiost all the lilcml idolatries, that the earth has ever known. The spiritual Babylon is hera charged with being a source and fountain of spiritual idolatry ; in other words, it is here predicted, that the Church of Rome would be an idolatrous church. It needs but to recall a few of the world-wide and long- enduring customs of that church, to prove how strikingly this prediction has been fulfilled. Rome enjoins the worship of a bread-god— the wafer, or sacrament ; and anathematizes all who refuse to render it. The Council of Trent plainly declares the doctrine of transubstantiation, that the bread and wine in the sacrament are " changed into our Lord Jesus Christ, true God and true man," and adds, " there is therefore now no room to doubt, that all the faithful in Christ, are bound to venerate this holy sacrament, and to render thereto the worship of iatria, which is due to the true God. ... If any one shall say, that this holy sacrament should not be adored, nor carried about in processions, nor held up publicly to the people, to adore it, or that its worshippers are idolaters, let hi/n be accursed." This worship is rendered to " the Host " by Roman Catholics, not only when it is elevated at the time of the sacrament, but whenever it is carried in procession in the streets. All persons are by the sound of a bell, admonished to worship the passing God, and accursed if they refuse. On all the millions of her members in every land, Rome enjoins as a solemn and indispensable duty, the adoration of a bit of bread which a man may eat or a mouse may nibble. Millions of martyrs have perished for protesting against this idolatry, and asserting that it is blasphemy to say, man can first make God, and then eat him ; a creed more degrading than any that the heathen hold. In the days when the " Corpus Christi" procession was a most imposing and dazzling ceremony, when friars, and monks, and priests, and prebends, and canons, and bishops, and archbishops, in varied and splendid costumes attended the bread-god through the streets of crowded cities, amid the clang of bells, bands of military music, choral hymns, FORETOLD AXD FULFILLED. and clouds of incense, it was no easy matter for a heretic to escape detection. From the moment the Host came in sight, until it had passed right out of the range of vision, the multi- tudes were commanded to bow in profound adoration and awe ! And woe to the man who dared to do otherwise, the Inquisi- tion speedily became his home, and the auto dafc his portion. Nor is this the worst form of Rome's idolatry : her mari- ohitry — her worship of the Virgin, is worse. We hesitate to record the profane blasphemies found in the writings of the Popes, prelates, and divines of Rome on this subject. Entire litanies of supplication are addressed to the Virgin ; attributes which are the glory of God alone, are ascribed to her ; the most extravagant and fantastic devotions are offered at her shrines ; the whole of the hundred and fifty Psalms of David, have been altcixi, so as to substitute for the Great Jehovali, the Virgin Mary, as an object of prayer and praise and holy trust : " Into thy hands I commend my spirit, O Lady, in thee have I reposed my hope ! Blessed is the man that loveth thy name, O holy Virgin, thy grace shall strengthen his soul. In thee, O Lady, have I hoped, I shall never be put to shame.'' This " Psalter of Bonaventura, Cardinal Bishop of Albano," has never been disowned, or prohibited by the Church of Rome. How completely the human mother has taken the place of her Divine Son, in the minds of Roman Catholics, may be gathered from a favourite story recorded by St. Francis. A monk had a vision ; he saw two ladders : one red, at the summit of which was Jesus Christ ; and the other white, at the top of which presided his blessed mother. He observed, that many who endeavoured to ascend the first ladder, after mount- ing a few steps, fell down ; and on trying again, were equally unsuccessful, so that they never attained the summit ; but a voice having told them to make trial of the white ladder, they soon gained the top, the blessed Virgin having held forth her hands to help them ! False doctrines, such as the fabulous " assumption of the Virgin" and the unscriptural ''immacu- FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. late conception," are freely invented by the Church of Rome, to justify this idolatrous adoration of the creature ; the latter, promulgated so lately as 1S54, by the Pope in St. Feter's, in the presence of two hundred bishops, filled the Catholic Church with joy. The following passage is from an encyclical letter of Pius IX. : — " But that our most merciful Lord may the more readily lend an car to our prayers, and grant our petitions, let us ever call upon the most holy mother of God, the immaculate Virgin Mary, to intercede with Him ; for she is the fond mother of us all, our mediatrix, our advocate, our securest and greatest hope, than whose interposition with God, nothing can be stronger, nothing more influential !"' The " Te Deum " itself, has been parodied, in honour of Mary, " We praise thee, O Mother of God ! we acknowledge thee, O Virgin Mary ! All the earth doth worship thee, the spouse of the everlasting Father ! Holy, holy, holy, Mary, Mother and Virgin. The church throughout all the world joins in calling on thee, the Mother of the Divine INIajesty!" And the creeds, have in like manner been parodied. Nor is it the Virgin alone who is worshipped. Images of her — mere dolls, are also adored ; witness the degrading cere- mony of the annual " coronation of the Virgin," in which the Pope himself takes part ; witness the worship of the " Ma- donna of the Augustinians ■'' and other Madonnas. Mariolatry, among the ignorant masses, is pure image worship, idolatry in its most sensual and childish form, the adoration of a doll ! Space forbids more than a passing allusion to the other forms of idol worship, characterizing the Romish Church, the worship of the " wooden cross," the worship of the " bam- bmo," the worship of the image of St. Peter, the worship of saints, the worship of relics, and similar profanities. When the subject is even superficially examined, the conviction that Rome Papal has exceeded Rome Pagan, in the degradation of her idolatries, becomes irresistible ; and the mind is over- whelmed with admiration of the wisdom and foreknowledge 156 FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. of the inspiring Spirit, who prefigured, ages before it existed, the Church of Rome, as the '' mother of abominations " or " idols." To conclude — in the true and eloquent words of another — "The Holy Spirit, foreseeing, no doubt, that the Church of Rome would adulterate the truth by many gross and grievous abominations ; that she would anathematize all who would not communicate with her, and denounce them as cut off from the body of Christ and the hope of everlasting salvation; foreseeing also that Rome would exercise a wide and dominant sway for many generations, by boldly iterated assertions of unity, anti- quity, sanctity, and universality ; foreseeing also that these pre- tensions would be supported by the civil sword of many secular governments, among which the Roman empire would be divided at its dissolution, and that Rome would thus be enabled to display herself to the world in an august attitude of imperial power, and with the dazzling splendour of temporal felicity . foreseeing also that the Church of Rome would captivate the imaginations of men, by the fascinations of art allied with religion, and would ravish their senses, and rivet their admir- ation, by gaudy colours, and stately pomp, and prodigal magnifi cence ; foreseeing also that she would beguile their credulity by miracles and mysteries, apparitions and dreams, trances and ecstasies, and would appeal to such evidence in support of her strange doctrines ; foreseeing likewise that she would enslave men, and (much more) women, by practising on their affec- tions, and by accommodating herself with dangerous pliancy to their weakness, relieving them from the burden of thought, and from the perplexity of doubt, by proffering them the aid of infallibility ; soothing the sorrows of the mourner by dispens- ing pardon, and promising peace to the departed ; removing the load of guilt from the oppressed conscience, by the minis- tries of the confessional, and by nicely poised compensations for sin ; and that she would flourish for many centuries in proud and prosperous impunity, before her sins would reach to heaven, and come in remembrance before God ; foreseeing also that FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. 157 many generations of men would t!ms be tempted to f:ill from the faith, and to become victims of deadly error ; and that they Avho clung to the truth would be exposed to cozening flatteries, and fierce assaults, and savage tortures, from her ; the Holy Spirit, we say, foreseeing all these things, in his Divine knowledge, and being the ever blessed Teacher, Guide, and Comforter of the church, was graciously pleased to pro- vide a heavenly antidote, for all these dangerous, wide-spread, and long-enduring evils, by dictating the Apocalypse. In this Divine book, the Spirit of God has portrayed the Church of Rome, such as none but He could have foreseen that she would become, and such as, wonderful and lamentable to say, she has become. He has thus broken her magic spells : He has taken the wand of enchantment from her hand ; He has lifted the mask from her face, and with his Divine hand. He has written her true character in large letters, and has planted her title on her forehead, to be seen and read of all, " Mystery, Babylon the Great, the mother of harlots and abominations of the earth." The Church of Rome holds in her hand the Apocalypse, the Revelation of Jesus Christ ; she acknowledges it to be Divine. Wonderful to say, she founds her claims on those very grounds which identify her with the faithless church, the Apocalyptic Babylon. As follows : — 1. The Church of Rome boasts of universality : And the harlot is seated on many waters, which are nations and peoples and tongues. 2. The Church of Rome arrogates indefectibility : And the harlot says that she is a queen for ever. 3. The Church of Rome vaunts of temporal felicity, and claims supremacy over all : And the harlot has kings at her feet. 4. The Church of Rome prides herself on working miracles : And the minister of the harlot makes fire to descend from heaven. 5. The Church of Rome points to the unity of all her mem- 158 FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. bers in one creed, and to their subjection under one supreme visible head : And the harlot requires all to receive her mark, and to drink of her cup. llence it appears that Rome's notes of the church, are marks of the harlot : Rome's trophies of triumph, are stigmas of her shame ; the very claims which she makes to be Zion, confirm the proof that she is Babylon. We have been contemplating the two mysteries of the Apocalypse. The word "mystery" signifies something spiritual; it here describes a church. The first mystery is explained to us by Christ Himself : "Tiie mystery of tlie seven stars which thou sawest ; the seven stars are the angels of the seven churches, and the seven candlesticks which thou sawest, are the seven churches." The second mystery is explained also : " I will tell thee the mystery of the woman. The woman is tJiat great city which reigneth over the kings of the earth." The first mystery is the mystery of the seven stars. The second mystery is the mystery of the seven hills. The first mystery represents the universal church in its sevenfold fulness, containing within it all particular churches. The second mystery represents a particular church, the church on seven hills, the Church of Rome, claiming to be the church universal. The first mystery represents tJie universal cJnirch, liable to defects, but not imposing errors as terms of communion ; and, therefore, by virtue of the word and the sacraments, held to- gether in apostolic communion with St. John, and with Christ, v/ho walketh in the midst of it, and governed by an apostolic ministry, shining Hke a glorious constellation, in the hand of Christ. The second mystery represents the particular CJiurch of Rome, holding the cup of her false doctrines in her hand, and making all nations to drink thereof. The first is a mystery of godliness. The second is a mystery of iniquity." FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. The foregoing is quoted from an admirable pamphlet, entitled, " Babylon ; or, the Question examined, Is the Church of Rome the Babylon of the Apocalypse?" by Chr. Wordsworth, D.D., Canon of Westminster (present Bishop of Lincoln). This book may fairly be called an unanswerable argument for an affirmative reply to the above inquiry. In 1850 the author challenged the Church of Rome to answer his argument in the following words : " If any minister oc member of the Church of Rome, can disprove this conclusion, he is hereby invited to do so. If he can, doubtless he ivill ; and if none attempt it, it may be presumed that they cannot ; and, if they cannot, then, as they love their salvation, they ought to embrace the truth which is preached to them, by the mouth of St. John, and by the voice of Christ." Sixteen years ago, when the above work was published, the author reiterated the challenge, and no reply has as yet been made to it by any member of the Church of Rome ! '• Si,:c-:h- less J " " Guilty before God." CHAPTER II. The Man of Sin, or Antichrist. a great fourfold prophecy of fundamental importance (dan. VII. 7-27 ; REV. XIII. 1-9 ; REV. XVII. ; 2 THESS. II.). — THE ROMAN POWER. — ITS LAST FORM AS PREDICTED HERE. — INDIVIDUAL AND DYNASTIC USE OF THE WORD " KING." — AN APOSTATE, BLASPHEMOUS, AND PERSECUTING POWER, — EXACTLY ANSWERING TO THE ONE HERE PREDICTED, HAS BEEN IN EXISTENCE FOR MORE THAN TWELVE CENTURIES, IN THE SUCCESSION OF THE POPES OF ROME. — ORIGIN OF THIS POWER. — ITS MORAL CHARACTER. — ITS SELF-EXALTING UTTERANCES. — ITS SELF-EXALTING ACTS. — ITS SUBTLETIES, FALSE DOCTRINES, AND LYING WONDERS. — ITS IDOLATRIES. — ITS DOMINION. — ITS PERSECUTION OF THE SAINTS. — ITS DURATION. — ITS DOOM. INTIMATELY associated with the Apocalyptic prophecy of Babylon the Great, which foretold, as we have seen, the existence, character, career, anu aoom, of the apostate church of Rome, is another prophecy so closely related to it, that the one cannot fairly be considered apart from the other. The woman which symbolises the corrupt church, is seen seated on a " scarlet-coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns." As the angelic interpre- tation connects the woman with Rome, by the words : " the woman which thou sawcst is that great city which ruleth over the kings of the earth," so it also connects tliis "beast" with Rome; for, interpreting its seven heads as seven successive forms ot government, the angel says of them, "five are fallen, and one IS." Under one of its seven forms, then, the power here in- tended was the riding power in the days when the Apocalypse was granted. That power was, as we know, the Roman Em- FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. i6i pirej it was by the tyrant Domitian that the Apostle John was exiled to Patmos, and it was under the Pagan persecutions of the Roman Emperors, that the saints of that age were suffering martyrdom. The past as well as the future history of this power, is sketched by the angel. Five of its forms of government had, at that time, already passed away. The sixth was then in existence, a seventh was to follow and last a short time, and then should come the eighth and last ; and it was on the beast as governed by this eighth and last head, that the woman was seen seated. Speaking of the "heads," or forms of government, the angel says, " Five are fallen, and one is, and the other is not yet come, and when he cometh he must continue a short space ; and the beast which thou sawest . . .he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition."' This scarlet-coloured beast is then a symbol of the final form of the Roman poiacr, the last phase of that power whose entire course is represented by the fourth great beast of Daniel. (Dan. vii.) A careful perusal of these prophecies, leaves no room to doubt, that the same power is symbolised a third time in the " beast from the abyss," described in the thirteenth chapter of Revelation. These scriptures present a threefold prophetic history, of one and the same power; and that power, beyond all question, is the great, the terrible, the exceeding strong, Ro.man Empire, the fourth universal monarchy from that of Babylon, the one which, both in Daniel's vision of the four beasts, and in Nebuchadnezzar's vision of the image, is represented as con- tinuing, till the establishment of the everlasting kingdom of the God of heaven. In common with the three preceding empires this power is re- presented as a beast, that is as degraded, ignorant, and ferocious. Daniel, in the days of Belshazzar, long before the first Advent, saw it as a power and a nei.s.i dominion, grew 2/p, silently bnt steadily, on the ruins of that Roman empire, which had extended its sway over, • Gibbon, " Decline and Fall," chap, xlix., p. SS5. FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. 177 or made itself respected by, nearly all the nations, peoples, and races, that lived in the period of its strength and glory ; and that new power, of lowly origin, struck a deeper root, and soon exercised a wider authority, than the empire whose gigantic ruins, it saw shivered into fragments, and mouldering in dust. In Rome itself, the power of the successor of Peter, grew side by side with and under the protecting shadow of that of the Emperor ; and such was the increasing influence of the Popes, that the majesty of the supreme Pontiff was likely ere long, to dim the splendour of the purple. The removal by Constantine of the seat of empire from the West, to the East, from the historic banks of the Tiber to the beautiful shores of the Bosphorus, laid the first broad foundation, of a sovereignty, which in reality commences from that momentous change. Practically, almost from that day, Rome which had witnessed the birth, the youth, the splendour, and the decay, of the mighty race by whom her name had been carried with her eagles, to the remotest regions of the then known world, was gradually abandoned by the inheritors of her renown ; and its people, deserted by the Em- perors, and an easy prey to the ravages of the barbarians, whom they had no longer the courage to resist, beheld in the bishop of Rome, their guardian, their protector, their father. Year by year the temporal authority of the Popes, grew into shape and hardened into strength ; without violence, without bloodshed, without fraud, by the force of overwhelming circumstances, fashioned, as if visibly, by the hand of God." II. Character. The circumstances connected with the origin of the Papacy fulfil then the indications of the prophecy. Has the character of this power, answered to that attributed to the predicted Antichrist ? Certain definite phases of evil, expressly noted in the prophetic word, will be considered further on ; but we ask now. What has been the general character of the Papal ]:)0wer ? If the question were proposed. Do the prophecies of the Messiah of Israel, find a fulfilment in Jesus of Nazareth ? it might be answered, not only by an appeal to definite predictions exactly I7S FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. fulfilled, but by a comprehensive glance at the general scope of the mass of I\Iessianic prophecy. The coming Messiah was to be a wondrous supernatural being, endued with heavenly power and wisdom, marked by matchless meekness, pure and holy, just and merciful, great yet lowly, a sufterer and yet a king, a victim and yet a judge, a servant of God, and yet Lord of all. By these general features, Jesus Ciirist was de- monstrated to be the hope of Israel, as well as by his being born at Bethlehem, and brought up at Nazaretli, Now the Antichrist has similarily his broad characteristics ; his very names imply some of them. He is called " that wicked," or the lawless one, who sets God's revealed will at defiance ; his coming is " after the working of Satan ;" he " opposeth and cxalteth himself," against God, and against his people. He is to be the " man of sin," the outcome of the working of " a mystery of iniquitv." He is the very opposite of all that is holy and good, the oppressor of all that love God, for Satan animates him. Further, he is called " the son of perdition," nnd this name, applied by our Lord to Judas Iscariot, the traitor, would prepare us to find the man of sin, the Anti- christ,* not in some openly and avowedly infidel power, but in :\. professedly Christia?i one. The "son of perdition" was an * " Antichrist " is a name used only in John, in four passages, as fol- lows, " Children, it is the last time : and as ye have heard that the Anti- chi-ist conicth, even now are there many Antichrists" (l John ii. i8). " Who is the liar (6 ^i\jaTt)%) but_he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? This is the Antichrist which denieth the P'ather and the Son ' (ii. 22). "■This is the spirit oi tlie AnlichriU, respecting wliicli ye have heard that it fontelh " (l John iv. 3). " Many deceiver.^ are gone fortli into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh ; this is the deceiver and the Antichrist." The repeated statements that Christians had heard of the coming of this Antichrist, prove that John alludes under this name to the • ' little horn " of Daniel, and the " man of sin " of Paul. The name itself means, not as is sometimes asserted, an avowed antagonist of Christ, but one professing to be a Vice-Christ, a rival-Christ, one \\ho woukl assume the ch.aractcr. occupy the place, and fulfd the functions of Christ. The in- cipient Antichrists of John's own day, denied the Father and the Son, /y their false doctrines about them. Etymologically the word does not mean a person opposed to Christ, but an op/>osing Christ, a vice-Christ, one assum- ing to be Christ. FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. ijc, apostate disciple, who betrayed his Lord with a kiss of seeming reverence and affection. This name would lead us to expect that a Judas character will attach to the great apostacy and its licad, and lead us therefore to look for it in the professing Christian Church, tlie sphere in which Paul indeed distinctly states, that it will be revealed. So dark is the moral aspect of the power predicted, what- ever it be, that many conceive that no power that ever has had an existence, can approach its enormity of guilt and evil ; and they look, in consequence, for some future monster of iniquity who shall better fulfil the predictions of Scripture. When this impression is not the result of ignorance of history, it illustrates the mournful facihty witli which famiharity witli evil, diminishes its enormity in our sight ; for it may be safely asserted that all, not to say more than all, these prophecies foretell, has found its realization in the line of Roman Pontiffs. It must be remembered that the Popes of Rome are guilty before God, not only for all the sins they have committed, but for all the sins they have connived at, for all the sins they have suggested, for all the sins they have encouraged and sanctioned, and, above all, for the sins they have coniniandcd. When their personal character and the influence of their examples, are considered, when the tendency of the institu- tions they have invented and maintained are examined, when their bulls and laws are studied, and their effects observed ; and when all these results are multiplied, by the extent of their dominion, the length of its duration, and the assumjition of infallibility and Divi^ic authority that accompanied it, the impression of unparalleled iniquity produced on the mind, defies all power of expression ; language seems too weak to embody it, and the words of inspiration seem to fall short of, rather than to exceed, the reality. Not only have an appalling number of the Roman Pontiffs been personally, exceedingly wicked men, as reference to any authentic history of the Popedom will show, (so wicked tliat it were a shame even to speak of the things tliat were done by I So FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. them ;) not only have they thus abused their high position, by setting examples of sin of the most flagi-ant kind ; but by their laws, exempting their innumerable clergy in all lands from the jurisdiction of the civil power, they have protected others in sinning in the same way : and they have, by their countless sinful and sin-causing enactments and institutions, led others i7ito sui, on a scale that it is positively appalling to contem- plate. Take for instance Papal doctrines and practices on the sub- ject of forgiveness of sin — indulgences. The Pope made a bargain with sinners, and on certain conditions, such as the joining in a crusade, the helping to extirpate so-called heresy, the performance of certain pilgrimages, the repetition of pre- scribed formulas, or the payment of money, he agreed to give them pardons for sin. Finding this traffic singularly lucrative, — for what will not men do to indulge in sin with impunity, — it was developed into a system of fabulous wickedness. Indulgences for the dead, as well as for the living, were freely sold, and thus the affections as well as the selfishness of men, were turned to account for the replenishment of tlie papal treasury. Some of these indulgences expressly mentioned the very sins, which the Scriptures declare, exclude from the kingdom of heaven, and bade those who practised them not doubt of eternal sal- vation, if they bought a papal indulgence. The number of years by which the torments of purgatory were to be abridged by some of these indulgences, was extra- vagant to the last degree. John XII. granted " ninety thousand years of pardon for deadly sins," for the devout repetition of three prayers, written in the chapel of the Holy Cross at Rome. Indeed, such has been the profligate extravagance with which these pardons have been dispensed, and the excessive facility with which they may be procured, that if they had been made available according to the intention of the Church, then must VAirgatory, again and again, ha\"e been swept out, — nay more, it must for ever be kept empty, and the sins of all the sinners that ever lived, must have been forgiven over and over again, FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. i8i The sale of these indulgences for money, was the proximate cause of the glorious Refcrmation. The intense disgust, and the utter abhorrence, with which they came to be regarded, in consequence of the unblushing effrontery, and shameless trickery, connected with their sale, roused all Germany to resist their introduction, and stirred up Martin Luther to ex- amine into the rotten foundation on which they rested. The deeply interesting story must not be told here— how Tetzel the indulgence-monger, bearing the bull of Leo X. on a velvet cushion, travelled in state from town to town in a gay equipage, took his station in the thronged church, and proclaimed to the credulous multitudes, " Indulgences are the most precious and sublime of God's gifts ; this red cross has as much efficacy as the cross of Jesus Christ. Draw near, and I will give you letters duly sealed, by which even the sins you shall hereafter desire to commit, shall be all forgiven you. There is no sin so great that indulgence cannot remit. Pay, only pay largely, and you shall be forgiven. But more than all this, indulgences save not the living alone, they also save the dead. Ye priests. ye nobles, ye tradesmen, ye wives, ye maidens, ye young men, hearken to your departed parents and friends, who call to you from the bottomless abyss, * We are enduring horrible torment, a small alms would deliver us, you can give it, 7vill you not ? ' The moment the money clinks at the bottom of the chest, the soul escapes from purgatory, and flies to heaven. With ten groschen you can deliver your father from purgatory. Our Lord God no longer deals with us as God — he has given all power to the Pope." The indulgences sold were in the fol lowing form " Our Lord Jesus Christ have mercy on thee, M. N. ; and absolve thee by the merits of his most holy suffer- ings. I, in virtue of the apostolic power committed to me, ab- solve thee from all . . . excesses, sins, and crimes, that thou mayest have committed, however great and enormous they may be, and of whatever kind. . . . I remit the i)ains ihou wouldest have had to endure in purgatory, ... I restore thee to the innocence and purity of thy baptism, so that at the moment of 1 82 FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. death, the gates of the place of torment shall be shut against thee, and the gates of Paradise open to thee. And if thou shouldest live long, this grace continueth unchangeable, till the time of thy end. In the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost, Amen. The brother John Tetzel, commissary, hath signed this with his own hand." For the wonderful and horrible account of the excesses of this abandoned agent of the Popes, we must refer the reader to D'Aubigne s History of the great Reformation, and similar works. There was a published scale of the prices for which different sins could be pardoned ; and that the gain of money was the only object was clear, from the enormous price charged for in- dulgences for certain crimes, likely to be committed by the rich, — crimes only by the laws of the cJnircJi, — while the grossest violations of the law of God were excused for a trifle. The royal, and merely conventional crime, of marriage with a first cousin, cost ^^looo, while the terrible sins of wife murder or parricide cost only ;^4 ! " The institution of indulgence," says Spanhcim, " was the mint which coined money, for the Roman Church ; the gold mines for the profligate nephews and natural children of the Popes ; the nerves of the Papal wars ; the means of liquida- ting debt ; and the inexhaustible fountain of luxury to the Popes." The curse fell on Simon Magus for thinking that the gift of God might be ///;r//^^^^ with money; what shall we say of him, who pretends that he has Divine authority to sell the grace of God for money ? Of him, who leads millions of im- mortal souls to incur the guilt and curse of Simon Magus, under the delusion that they are securing salvation ? and who leads them to do this for his own wicked and selfish ends ? Is it possible to find guilt of a deeper die, perfidy of a more atrociously cruel and satanic character? Even the Jews could say, " None can forgive sins save God only ; " what shall we say of him who professes to blot out guilt, and remove its penalty, from countless thousands who repose unlimited con- fidence in him, in order to secure his own evil ends ? FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. 183 " Whoso confesseth and forsaketh his sin, shall find mercy ; " what shall we say of him who offers boundless mercy, to those who so love and cleave to their sins, as to be willing to pay enormous prices for permission to commit them ? of him who makes plenary pardon dependent on mere outward acts, prayers, pilgrimages, payments, or even on the commission of other gross sins, massacres, extirpation of heretics, etc. ? The Psalmist prayed " Keep back thy servant from presump- tuous sins, O Lord ; " what shall we say of him, who encourages to presumptuous sin, by the prospect of plenary pardon at the moment of death, on condition of holaing a candle, or kissing a bead ? That this practice is a miglUy and eflectivc inducement to sin, no one acquainted with human nature, and the operation of moral causes, can question : and, worse still, it misrepre- sents the atonement of Christ, asserting its insufficiency to put away sin ; it denies the boundlessness and freedom of the love of God, and of the Gospel of grace, which offers pardon without money and without price ; it gives false impressions of the true nature of sin, the guilt of which is so great that blood-shedding alone can remove it ; it separates what God has indissolubly joined, justification and sanctification, providing pardon apart from a change of heart \ it conceals from view the tribunal of the righteous Judge, and draws men to a fcUow- man, sinners to a fellow-sinner, for pardon. It is opposed to the doctrines of "repentance toward God, and faith in our Lord Jesus Christ," as well as to all practical godliness, and is a characteristic creation of " that wicked, whose coming is after the working of Satan." Its institution and patronage of the Order of tiic Jcsiii/s is another of the exceedingly sinful deeds of the Papacy. This Society, which has dared to appropriate to itself the Name which is above every name, by calling itself " The Order of Jesus," deserves rather, from the nature of its doctrines, and from the work it has done in the world, to be called "The Order of Satan." Founded by Ignatius Loyola, a Spanish 1 84 FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. officer, cotemporary with Luther, its great object was, to sub- jugate the whole luiman race, to the power of the Papacy. From the book of the " Constitutions " of the Jesuits, we obtain the evidence that condemns their Order as a master- piece of the father of lies. Expediency, in its most licentious form, is the basis of their whole system of morality. Their doctrine of " probability ; " their doctrine of " mental reservation," by which lying and perjury are justified; their doctrine of "intention," which renders the most solemn oath of no power to bind a man; the v.'ay in which, by their glosses, they make void the law of God in every one of its precepts, and give licence to every crime, not excepting murder, and even parricide, all these render their whole system of morals a bottomless abyss of iniquity. This is no mere Protestant account of the Jesuits ; their extraordinary viciousness, has led to their suppression, and expulsion, at various times, by different Catholic sovereigns in Europe. In stating their grounds for such action, these monarchs give descriptions of Jesuit morality, which could scarcely be worse. The Catholic king of Portugal says : " It cannot be, but that the licentiousness introduced by the Jesuits, of which the three leading features are falsehood, murder, and perjury, should give a new character to morals. Their doctrines render murder innocent, sanctify falsehood, authorize perjury, deprive the laws of their power, destroy the submission of subjects, allow individuals the liberty of killing, calumniating, lying and forswearing themselves, as their advan- tage may dictate ; they remove the fear of Divine and human laws, so that Christiari and civil society could ?tot exist, where they are paramount." In 1767 they were expelled from Spain on similar groimds. They were also expelled from Venice (1606); from Savoy (1729); from France (1764); from Sicily (1767), and from various other States. From 1555 to 1773 they suffered no less than thirty-seven expulsions, all on account of their iniquitous doctrines and rvil praciiccs. FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. 1S5 The Catholic University of Paris, in 1643, said of them: *' The laws of God have been so sophisticated by their unheard- of subtleties, that there is no longer any difiterence between vice and virtue ; they promise impunity to the most flagrant crimes ; their doctrines are inimical to all order ; and if such a pernicious theology were received, deserts and forests would be preferable to cities ; and society with wild beasts, who have only their natural arms, would be better than society with men, who, in addition to the violence of their passions, would be instructed by this doctrine of devils, to dissimulate and feign, in order to destroy others with greater impunity. // is a device of the great enemy of sold s." The Parliament of Paris, in 1762, used language quite as strong in a memorial to the king, accompanying a collection of extracts from 147 Jesuit authors, which they presented to him, " that he might be acquainted with the wickedness of the doctrine constantly held by the Jesuits, from the institution of their Society to the present moment— a doctrine authorizing robbery, lying, perjury, im- purity ; all passions, and all crimes ; inculcating homicide, parricide, and regicide ; overturning religion and sanctioning magic, blasphemy, irreligion, and idolatry." The book of " secret instructions," generally attributed to Lainez, the second Father-general of the Order, contains directions so unprincipled, that on the first page it is ordained that, if the book fell into the hands of strangers, it was to be positively denied that these were the rules of the Society ! This book gives directions for the attainment of power, in- fluence, and wealth, by means of the vilest intrigues : the vices of the rich and great, were to be pandered to in every way ; spies were to be diligently sought and liberally rewarded; animosities were to be fostered and stirred up among enemies, in order to weaken them ; the dying were to be watched as if by vultures, and promised canonization by the Pope, if they would becjueath their property to this Order. ^Vomcn who were found in confession to have bad husbands, were to be instructed to withdraw a sum of money secretly, to be given lS6 FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. to the Society, as a sacrifice for their husbands' sins. To all classes, but especially to the great and rich, any vicious indul- gence they desired might be allowed, in order to soothe and win them, provided public scandal were avoided. These and multitudes of similar injunctions, are based on the doctrine, that we may do evil that good may come, that "the end sanctities the means." Scripture says of those who hold and teach this doctrine, that their " damnation is just." The same principle led Jesuit missionaries into the most sinful compromises with heathen superstitions and philosophies in different parts of the world. In India they swore that they were Brahmins of pure descent, sanctioned some of the most abominable habits of idolatry, and practised some of the worst Hindu austerities, to acquire fame. In China, they pretended that there was only a shade of difference between the doctrine of Christ and the teachings of Confucius ; and to make proselytes, they taught, instead of pure Christianity, a corrupt system of religion and morality, that was quite con- sistent with the indulgence of all the passions. Nay, so far did they go, that, finding the Crucifi.xion was a stumbling-block to the philosophic Chinese, as to the Jews of old, they actually denied that CJirist\vas rccr crueified at all., and said it was a base calumny invented by the Jews, to throw contempt on the Gospel ! They told the Red Indians that Jesus Christ was a mighty chief, who had scalped more men and women and children than any warrior that had ever lived ! Having no real principles, they were willing to make any compromise, no matter how foul, provided they could by it advance the interests of their Order, or swell the roll of recruits to the Roman army. Now, when we remember that the teachings of these Jesuits are not only permitted, but received as standard authorities in the Roman Catholic Church, and directly sanctioned by the Popes, what shall we say of tlie so-called Vicar of Christ ? Is not this the dcceivableness of unrighteousness? Is not this the doctrine of devils? And is not he who sanctions and FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. 1S7 patronizes such an " Order " of Satan, " the lawless one •"' ? Is he not, and does he not richly deserve to be, " a son of perdition " ? Is he not a " man of sin " who speaks lies in hypocrisy, having his conscience seared with a hot iron ? Where, if not here, shall we ever detect the predicted mystery of iniquity ? That the line of Roman Pontiffs, have been for the most part personally wicked men, there can be no doubt ; that many of their institutions, besides the two just considered, have been fearfully fruitful sources of deep deluges of sin, is also unquestionable ; but perhaps nothing more fully warrants the application to them of the distinctive title, "The IMan of Sin," than the fact that they have commanded sin. If Aaron was doubly guilty because he led the people to worship the golden calf ; if the wickedness of Jeroboam the son of Nebat, is in- tensified by the fact that he " caused Israel to sin" what must be the dark guilt, and the dreadful doom of those, who have led the professing Church of Christ into the foulest idolatry, and into sin of every conceivable kind, not only by example, not only by false doctrines and evil practice, but also by direct commands — commands delivered in the name of the Lord, and believed by the people to have Divine authority ; and this not to a few, not as an occasional thing, or during a brief period, but to all papal Christendom and throughout long ages ! This double dyed guilt, lies at the door of the power we are considering. Did not the Popes of Rome, for their own selfish ends, command, what Scripture forbids, the celibacy of the clergy, and thus lead the whole body, in all lands, into disobe- dience to God in this respect, a disobedience that was the direct cause of the wide-spread and unfiithomable Hood of moral corruption, that deluged Europe for ages? Have not the Popes, times without number, commanded idolatries, persecutions, treasons, rebellions, regicides ? Any collection of papal bulls, presents a very harvest of commands to sin, commands which were, alas ! only too faithfully obeyed by multitudes. 1 83 FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. And how often have tliey prohibited, the very things enjoined by God ! Is not this a negative command to sin ? Christ bids all men, for instance, " Search the Scriptures,'* " prove all things, and hold fast that which is good." On no one point, are the Popes more resolved to enforce disobedience to the Divine will ; in bull after bull they have forbidden the use of the Scriptures in their own tongue to the people, saying, *' Let it be lawful for no man whatever to infringe this declaration of our will and command, or to go against it with bold rashness." When Wickliffe published his translation, Pope Gregory sent a bull to the University of Oxford (1378) condemning the trans- lator as having " run into a detestable kind of wickedness." When Tyndale published his translation, it was condemned. In 1546, when Luther was preparing his German version, Leo X. published a bull, couched in the most vile and opprobrious language. The indignation of Pius VII. (and other Popes) against Bible Societies, knows no bounds. He speaks of the Bible Society as a " crafty device by which the very founda tions of religion are undermined," as " a pestilence dangerous to Christianity;" "a defilement of the faith, eminently dan- gerous to souls;" "a nefarious scheme," etc., and strictly commands, that every version of the Scriptures into a vulgar tongue, without the church's notes, should be placed in the Index among prohibited books. Curses are freely bestowed on those who assert the liberty of the laity to read the Scrip- tures, and every possible impediment is thrown in the way of their circulation. Bible burning is a favourite ceremony with Papists ; and their ignorance of the real contents of the book, is almost incredible. The famous bull " Unigenitus," a.d. 17 13, condemns the proposition that " the reading of the Scriptures is for everybody" as "false, shocking, scandalous, impious, and blasphemous." What must be the guilt, in the eyes of God, of the men who thus withhold the word, by which alone they can be born again, from myriads of perishing sinners, over whose con- sciences they Iiave perfect sway ! FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. III. Self-exalting Utterances. One of the leading characteristics of the power symbohsed by the " little horn " is " a mouth speaking great things." The destruction of the beast is said to be, " because of the great words which the little horn spake." The same point is noted also in Rev. xiii. 5, where the beast is said to have " a mouth speaking great things, and blasphemies."* Paul similarly predicts of the man of sin, that he will oppose and exalt himself above all that is called God or that is worshipped." We must therefore inquire whether self-exalting utterances of a peculiarly impious nature, have been a characteristic of the Papacy ? We turn to the public documents, issued by various Popes, and find, that they have fulfilled in a marvellous way this prediction ; the pretensions they have made are blas- phemies, the claims they have put forth, are, to be equal, if not superior to God Himself; no power on earth has ever advanced similar pretensions. Fox, in his "Acts and Monuments," gives extracts from two hundred and twenty-three authentic documents, compris- ing decrees, decretals, extravagants, pontificals, and bulls, all of which are indisputable evidence. Twenty pages of small type in a large volume, are filled with the "great words" of the Popes, taken from these two hundred and twenty-three documents alone. What a crop would a complete collection of Papal publications afford ! Space forbids many quotations ; • " Blasphemy in Scripture means not so much a speaking against God, as the assumption of Divine attributes or Divine power where no rightful claim to do so exists. Thus, in Matt, ix., the scribes said of Jesus, ' this man blasphemeth,' because He said to the sick of the palsy, ' thy sins be for- given thee.' Jesus could rightly say so, therefore their charge was false. Rome, through her priesthood, can not rightly say so, therefore our charge against her is true ; she blasphemeth. Again, in John x. 30-33, we read that, when Jesus said, ' I and my Father are one,' the Jews took up Vitoncs to stone Him, saying, ' for agood work we stone Thee not, but for blasphetny, and because that Thou, being a man, makest Thyself God.' Jesus and his Father were one, therefore the charge of blasphemy was vain ; the Pope and God are not one, therefore our charge of blasphemy is true. He that says, ' 1 am the sole last supreme judge of wliat is riiilit and wrong,' blasphemeth." — "Words of the Little Horn," byRev.H.F. Brooke. iQo FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. let the reader judge of the mass from the following samples, which we blend into one, in order to help the conception. If '•' he that exalteth himself shall be abased," what degradation can be commensurate with such sclf-cxaltation as this ? " Wherefore, seeing such power is given to Peter, and to mc in Peter, being his successor, who is he then in n.11 the world that ought not to be subject to my decrees, which have such power in heaven, in hell, in earth, with the quick, and also the dead. ... By the jurisdiction of which key the fulness of my power is so great that, whereas all others are subjects — yea, and emperors themselves, ought to subdue their executions to me ; only I am a subject to no creature, no, not to myself ; so that my papal majestycverremaineth undiminished; superior to all men ; whom all persons ought to obey, and follow, whom no man must judge or accuse of any crime, no man depose but I myself. No man can excommunicate mc, yea though I commune with the excommunicated, for no canon bindeth mc : whom no man must lie to, for he that lieth to me is a church robber, and who obeyeth not me is a heretic, and an excommunicated person. . . . Thus, then, it appeareth, that the greatness of priesthood began in Melchisedec, was solemnized in Aaron, continued in the children of Aaron, perfcction- ated in Christ, represented in Peter, exalted in the universal jurisdiction, and manifested in the Pope. So that through this pre-eminence of my priest- hood, having all things subject to me, it may seem well verified in me, that was spoken of Christ, ' Thou hast subdued all things under his feet, sheep and oxen, and all cattle of the field, the birds of heaven, and fish of the sea,' etc., where is it to be noted that by oxen, Jews and heretics ; by cattle of the field. Pagans be signified. . , , By sheep and all cattle, are meant all Christian men, both great and less, whether they be emperors, princes, prelates, or others. By birds of the air you may understand angels and potentates of heaven, who be all subject to mc, in that I am greater than the angels, and that in four things, as afore declared ; and have power to bind and loose in heaven, and to give heaven to them that fight in my wars. Lastly, by the fishes of the sea, are signified the souls departed, in pain or in purgatory. . . . For, as we read, ' The earth is the Lord's and the fulness thereof;" and, as Christ saith, 'AH power is given to ilim, both in heaven and in earth : ' so it is to be affirmed, that the Vicar of Christ hath power on things celestial, terrestrial, and infernal, which he took immediately of Christ. ... I owe to the emperors no due obe- dience that they can claim, but they owe to me, as to their superior ; and, therefore, for a diversity betwixt their degree and mine, in their consecra- tion they take the unction on their arm, I on the head. And as I am supe- rior to them, so am I superior to all laws, and free from all constitutions ; who am able of myself, and by my interpretation, to prefer equity net being FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. 191 written, bel'ore the law written ; having all laws, within the chest of my breast, as is aforesaid. . . . What country soever, kingdom, or pro- vince, choosing to themselves bishops and ministers, although they agree with all other Christ's faithful people in the name of Jesu, that is, in faith and charity, believing in the same God, and in Christ, his true Son, and in the Holy Ghost, having also the same creed, the same evangelists, and scriptures of the apostles ; yet, notwithstanding, unless their bishops and ministers take their origin and ordination from this apostolic seat, they are to be counted not of tlie church, so that succession of faith only is not suffi- cient to make a church, except the ministers take their ordination from them who have their succession from the apostles. . . . And likewise it is to be presumed that the bishop of that church is always good and holy. Yea, though he fall into homicide or adultery, he may sin, but yet he cannot be accused, but ratlier excused by the murders of Samson, the thefts of the Hebrews, etc. All the earth is my diocese, and I the ordinary of all men, having the authority of the King of all kings upon subjects. I am all in all and above all, so that God Himself, and I, the Vicar of God, have both one consistory, and I am able to do almost all that God can do. In all things that I list, my will is to stand for reason, for I am able by the law to dispense abave the law, and of wrong to make justice in correcting laws and changing them. . . . Wherefore, if those things that I do be said not to be done of man, but of God : what can you MAKE ME BUT GoD ? Again, if prelates of the Church be called and counted of Constantine for gods, I then, being above all prelates, seem by this reason to be above all gods. Wherefore, no marvel if it be in my power to change time and times, to alter and abrogate laws, to dispense with all things, yea, ivitli the precepts of Christ ; for where Christ biddcth Peter put up his sword, and admonishes his disciples not to use any out- ward force in revenging themselves, do not I, Pope Nicholas, writing tto tlic bishops of France, exhort them to draw out their material swords ? And, whereas Christ was present Himself at the marriage in Cana of Galilee, do not I, Pope Martin, in my distinction, inhibit the spiritual clergy to be present at marriage-feasts, and also to marry ? Moreover, where Christ biddeth us lend without hope of gain, do not I, Pope Martin, give dispen- sation for the same ? What should I speak of murder, making it to bf no murder or homicide to slay them that be excommunicated ? Like- wise, against the law of nature, item against the apostles, also against the canons of the apostles, I can and do disjiense ; for where they, in their canon, command a priest for fornicalion to be deposed, I, througli the authority of Silvester, do alter the rigour of that constitution, considering the minds and bodies also of men now to be weaker than they were then. . . . If ye list briefly to hear the whole number of all such cases as properly do apper- tain to my Papal dispensation, which come to the number of one-and-fifty 193 FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. points, that no man may meddle with but only / myself alone, I will recite them : — "Tlie Pope doth canonize saints, and none else but he. " Ilis sentence makcth a law. " lie is able to abolish laws, both civil and canon. " To erect new religions, to approve or reprove rules or ordinances, and ceremonies in the Church. " He is able to dispense with all the precepts and statutes of the Church. " The same is also free from all laws, so that he cannot incur any sen- tence of excommunicaticJn, suspension, irregularity, etc., etc. " After that I have now sufficiently declared my power in earth, in heaven, in purgatory, how great it is, and what is the fulness thereof in binding, loosing, commanding, permitting, electing, confirming, disposing, dispensing, doing and undoing, etc , I will speak now a little of my riches and of my great possessions, that every man may see by my wealth, and abundance of all things, rents, tithes, tributes, my silks, my purple mitres, crowns, gold, silver, pearls and gems, lands and lordships. For to me per- taineth first the imperial city of Rome ; the palace of Lateran ; the king- dom of Sicily is proper to me, Apulia and Capua be mine. Also the king- dom of England and Ireland, be they not, or ought they not to be, tribu- taries to me ? To these I adjoin also, besides other provinces and coun- tries, both in the Occident and Orient, from the north to the south, these dominions by name (here follows a long list). What should I speak here of my daily revenues, of my first-fruits, annates, palls, indulgences, bulls, confessionals, indults and rescripts, testaments, dispensations, privileges, elections, prebends, religious houses, and such like, which come to no small mass of money ? . . . whereby what vantage cometh to my coffers it may partly be conjectured. . . . But what should I speak of Germany, when the whole world is my diocese, as my canonists do say, and all men are bound to believe ; except they will imagine (as the Manichees do) two beginnings, which is false and heretical? For Moses saith. In the beginning God made heaven and earth ; and not, In the beginnings. Wherefore, as I began, so I conclude, commanding, declaring, and pronouncing, to stand UPON NECESSITY OF S.\LVATION, FOR EVERY HUMAN CREATURE TO BE SUEJECT TO ME." Add to these utterances, which might be multipUed by the thousand, the usual formula of investiture with the papal tiara : " Receive this triple crown, and know that thou art the father of princes, and the kifig and ruler of the worlds And in proof that the claims here advanced are no obsolete medinsval assumptions, abandoned in modern times, but the unchange- FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. 193 able voice of the Papacy, take a i&w " great words " from a comparatively recent sermon of the principal representative of Rome in England, Cardinal INIanning, who puts the following similar language into the mouth of the Pope. "You say I have no authority over the Christian world, that I am not the Vicar of the Good Shepherd, that I am not the supreme interpreter of the Christian faith. I am all these. You ask me to abdicate, to renounce my supreme authority. You tell me I ought to submit to the civiS power, that I am the subject of the King of Italy, and from him I am to receive instructions as to the way I should exercise the civil power. I say I am liberated from all civil subjection, that my Lord made me the subject of no one on earth, king or otherwise ; that in his right I am Sovereign. I acknowledge no civil superior. I am the subject of no prince, and I claim more than this. I claim to be the Supreme Judge and director of the consciences of men ; of the peasant that tills the field, and the prince that sits on the throne ; of the household that lives in the shade of privacy, and the Legislature that makes laws for kingdoms. I am the sole, last. Supreme Judge of what is right and wrong." In full harmony with this assumption is the new definition of Papal infallibility : " The Roman Pontiff, when he speaks ' ex cathedra,' that is, when, in discharge of his office of pas- tor and doctor of all Christians, by virtue of his supreme apostolic authority, he defines a doctrine regarding faith and morals, to be held by the universal church, he enjoys infallibility, and that therefore such definitions of the Roman Pontiff are irreformable of themselves, and not from the consent of the church. And if any one presume to contradict this definition, let him be anathema." But actions speak louder than words ! The Popes have not confined their self-exaltation to empty boastings. They have practically exalted themselves " above all that is called God, or that is worshipped." The following is extracted from the " Ceremoniale Ronianum," and describes the first public o 194 FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. appearance of the Pope in St. Peter's, on his election to the Pontificate. After the investiture with the scarlet papal robes, the vest covered with pearls, and the mitre studded with precious stones, the new Pope is conducted to the altar, before which he prostrates himself in prayer, bowing as before the seat of God. An awful sequel then follows. We read : "The Pope rises, and, wearing his mitre, is lifted up by the cardinals, and is placed by them upo7i the altar to sit there. One of the bishops kneels, and begins the Te Deuni. In the mean time the cardinals kiss the feet and hands and face of the Pope." This ceremony is commonly called by Roman Catholic writers "The adoration;" it has been observed for many centuries, and was performed at the inauguration of Pius IX. A coin has been struck in the papal mint which represents it, and the legend is, " Quem creant adorant," " whom they create (Pope) they adore." The language in which this adoration is couched is blasphemous to a degree. At the coronation of Pope Innocent X. Cardinal Colonna on his knees, in his own name and that of the clergy of St. Peter's, addressed the following words to the Pope : " Most holy and blessed father, head of the church, ruler of the world, to whom the keys of the kingdom of heaven are committed, whom the angels in heaven revere, and the gates of hell fear, and all the world adores, we specially venerate, worship, and adore thee." The very assumption the Pope makes, to be Christ's Vicar involves self-exaltation. How should one representing the Judge of all be judged by any? He might ynake laws, but he held himself above all law. Was not Christ King of kings and Lord of lords? How then could he, the representative of Christ, do other than regard all kings, and rulers, and potentates, as his subjects, to be crowned and uncrowned by him at his pleasure ? His dominion he likened to that of the sun, all other dominion being like that of the moon and satellites, immeasurably inferior. Pope Celcstine III., when crowning Henry VI., expressed in action his sense of his own superiority to all monarchs : "The Lord Pope sat in the pontifical chair, FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. 195 holding the golden imperial crown between \\v=, fed ; and the Emperor, bending his head, and the Empress, received the cxown from the feet of -the Lord Pope. But the Lord Pope in- stantly struck with his foot the Emperor's crown, and cast it upon the ground, signifying that he had the power of deposing him, from the empire, if he were undeserving of it. The car- dinals lifted up the crown, and placed it upon the Emperor's head." " Is not the king of England my bondslave ? " said Innocent VI, " Hath not God set me as a prince over all nations, to root out and to pull down, to destroy and to build?" asks Boniface VIII. The glorious declarations of the world-wide homage yet to be paid to Messiah the Prince, have been applied by the Popes as descriptive of the respect due by earthly monarchs to them : " All kings shall fall down before Him, all nations shall serve Him;" and since Christ was God, and he was Christ's representative and Vicar, was he not also to be regarded by men as God ? Even to this height of blasphemy and folly did Antichrist push his pretensions. Witness the address of Marcellus to the Pope at the Lateran Council: " Thou art another God on earth ; " and the oft-ac- cepted title, " Our Lord God the Pope." And since the Pope by his power of transubsiantiatioji can even make God, and by his power of ordination can enable his countless priests to do the same, is he not in a sense the superior of God Plimself ? What adoration can be too profound for one exalted so high ? Such worship is accepted by the Roman Pontiffs. We read, " great is the mystery of godliness ; God was manifest in the flesh," the Most High stooped and made Himself of no reputation. May we not say, in considering the self-exaltation of the Popes of Rome, great is the " mystery of iniquity," man, sinful, mortal man, exalting himself to be as God ! And strange to say, men allowed it : " All the world wondered after the beast." It was no empty boast of Gregory II. : " All the kings of the West reverence the Pope as a god on earth." Sismondi describes how Pepin and tiic 196 FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. Franks received Vxxa.'-'' as a divi7iity.'" The mighty Emperor Charlemagne consented to receive his title and empire as a donation from the Pope ; and ere long the coronation oath of Western kings came to include a vow, to be " faithful and submissive to the Pope." Kings and emperors consented, like our own John, and like the Emperor Otho, and many others, to hold their dominions as vassals of the Pope, and to resign them at his bidding : to hold his stirrup, and lead his palfrey, like servants, to kiss his feet and bow in his presence like slaves. In his full fame, and flushed with victory, the great Francis I., of France, in his interview with Leo X. at Bologna, just before the Reformation, "knelt three times in approaching him, and then kissed his feet." The Emperor Henry of Germany, driven to the most abject humiliation by the terror of a papal interdict, sought pardon, barefoot and clothed in sack-cloth, and was kept waiting three wintry days and nights at the doors of the supreme Pontiff, ere he could secure an interview. It is difficult in this nineteenth century to credit the records which reveal, the unbounded power of the Pope during the dark ages, and the nature and extent of the claims he asserted, to the reverence and subjection of mankind. If kings and emperors yielded him abject homage, the common people regarded him as a deity. His dogmas were received as oracles, his bulls and sentences were to them the voice of God. The Sicilian ambassadors prostrated themselves before Pope Mar- tin, with the thrice-repeated cry, " Lamb of God, that takest away the sins of the world.'' " The people think of the Pope as the one God that has power over all things, in earth and in heaven," said Gcrston. The fifth Lateran Council subscribed, just before the Reformation, a decree which declared, that "as there was but one body of the church, so there was but one head, viz., Christ's Vicar, and that it was essential to the salva- tion of every iitanan being to he subject to the Roman Pontiff." " Every spiritual as well as every ecclesiastical office of Christ, was arrogated to Iiimsclf by the ' man of sin.' " " If hO RETOLD AND FULFILLED. 197 Christ was the universal Shepherd of souls, was not he, the Pope, the same ? If Christ was the door of the sheep, was not he the door ? If Christ was the truth, was not he the depositary, source, and oracular expounder of the truth, authoritative, infallible, independent of Scripture, and even against it ? If Christ was the Holy One, was not he the same, and did not the title, Jiis holiness, distinctively and alone belong to him ? If Christ was the husband of the Church, was not he the same ? With the marriage ring in the ceremonial of his inauguration he signified it; and with his great voice in his canon law and papal bulls he proclaimed it to the world. The power of the keys of Christ's Church and kingdom, given hi^, extended into the invisible world. He opened with them, and who might shut ? He shut, and who might open ? . . . the souls in purgatory and the angels in heaven were subject to him ; and it was even his prerogative to add to the celestial choir ; by his canonizing edicts he elevated whom he pleased of the dead to form part of heaven's hierarchy, and become objects of adoration to men." * IV. Subtleties, False Doctrines, and Lying Wonders. The foregoing are not the only characteristics which lead the careful student of Scripture and of history, to recognise in the Papacy, the great predicted power of evil, that was to arise in the latter times of the fourth great empire, and fix its seat at Rome. The coming of the Antichrist was to be " with all power and signs and lying wonders, and with all deceivable- ness of unrighteousness." We must inquire whether this mark has been visibly impressed on the papal dynasty, whether subtleties, false doctrines, and lying wonders, have been an essential part of its policy. Again the abundance of evidence alone makes reply diflScult ! Macaulay says : " It is impossible to deny, that the polity of the Church of Rome, is the very 7nasterpiece of Jmman linsdom. In truth nothing but such a polity could, against such assaults, • Elliott, "Ilora;," III., p. 161, condensed. I9S FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. liave borne up such doctrines. The experience of twelve hundred eventful years, the ingenuity and patient care of forty generations of statesmen, have improved that polity to such perfection, that among the contrivances zv/u'ch have been, devised for deceiving and oppressing mankind, it occupies the highest place. The stronger our conviction that reason and Scripture were decidedly on the side of Protestantism, the greater is the re- luctant admiration with which we regard that system of tactics against which reason and Scripture were employed in vain." This wonderful policy of the Papacy may be viewed as an ex- pression of Satanic genius, if we may use the expression, or as a fruit of human genius. Regarded as " the working of Satan," it is in perfect harmony with all the other workings, of him, who has been a liar from the beginning. It has been by means of a counterfeit Christianity that Satan has, .through the Papacy, resisted the spread of true Christianity. The Papacy has its counterfeit high priest, the Pope ; its counter- feit sacrifice, the mass ; its counterfeit Bible, tradition ; its counterfeit mediators, the Virgin, the saints, and angels ; the forms have been copied, the realities set aside. Satan in- augurated and developed a system, not antagonistic to Christianity, but a counterfeit of it ; and as Jannes and Jambres withstood Moses, so {i.e., by imitation) he has with- stood Christ. But viewed as a fabrication of human ambition and wicked- ness, the subtlety with which the Papacy has adapted itself to its end, is a marvel of genius. That end was, to exalt a man, and a class of men, the Pope and his priesthood, to the supreme and absolute control of the Avorld and all its affairs ; to reign, not only over the bodies, but over the minds of men. To attain this object it employed a policy, unmatched in dissimu- lation and craft, a sagacity distinguished by largeness of con- ception combined with attention to detail, irresistible energy, indomitable perseverance, and, when art was unavailing, over- whelming physical force. In the selection of Rome as its seat of empire, the Papacy FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. 199 secured enormous prestige. " In no other spot, would its gigantic schemes of dominion have been formed, or, if formed, realized. Sitting in the seat which the masters of the world had so long occupied, the Papacy appeared the rightful heir of their power. Papal Rome, reaped the fruit of the wars and the conquests, the toils and the blood, of Imperial Rome. The one had laboured and gone to her grave, the other arose and entered into her labours. The Pontifis were per- petually reminding the world, that they were the successors of the Csesars, that the two Romes were linked by an indis- soluble bond, and that to the latter had descended the heritage of glory and dominion acquired by the former. . . . The Pontiffs also claimed to be successors of the Apostles : a more masterly stroke of policy still. As the successor of Peter, the Pope was greater, than as the successor of Caesar. The one made him a king, the other made him king of kings ; the one gave him the power of the sword, the other invested him with the still more sacred authority of the keys. . . . The Papacy is the ghost of Peter crowned with the shadowy diadem of the old Caesars." * Every doctrine and dogma of the Papacy is framed with a similar design, to exalt the priesthood, at the expense of the intellect, the conscience, and the eternal well-being, of man- kind. By the doctrine of traditmi, the priest becomes the channel of Divine revelation, and by that of inherent efficacy in the sacraments, the channel of Divine grace : men are wholly dependent on the priesthood, for a knowledge of the will of God, and an enjoyment of the salvation of God. Recognising that no religion enjoining a high morality could ever be a popular one, in a world of sinners, who love sin, the Papacy presented a religion of ritual observance, instead of one of spiritual power : heaven could be secured by outward acts ; obedience to the church, not a change of heart, was the great essential of salvation. Men naturally seek to earn heaven; • Wylic's " Papacy," p. 414. FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. Popery sets them to work to do so, teaching salvation by merit, and denying salvation by faith. " It provides convents for the ascetic and the mystic ; carnivals for the gay ; missions for the enthusiast ; penances for the man suffering from remorse ; sisterhoods of mercy for the benevolent ; crusades for the chivalrous; secret missions for the man whose genius lies in intrigue ; the Inquisition, with its racks and screws, for the cruel bigot ; indulgences for the man of wealth and pleasure ; purgatory to awe the refractory, and frighten the vulgar ; and a subtle theology for the casuist and the dialectitian." * Its marvellous flexibility, its adaptation of its doctrines to all classes and conditions of men, is one phase of the exceeding siiltlety of the Papacy. Many others might be adduced, as for instance its encouragement of ignorance, in the people, in order to the production and maintenance of that superstition, which alone makes spiritual imposture easy or even practicable. The absurd and childish doctrine oi purgatory, unknown in the church till the end of the sixth century, could never have obtained currency, but for the aid of fictitious miracles, — visions of departed persons broiling on gridirons, roastUig on spits shivering in water, or burning in fire, etc. Such " lying wonders" were therefore freely invented by the priests, and readily credited by the people ; and by their means the doctrine, which was one of the most lucrative ever invented, was soon firmly established. Time would fail us, to speak of the " lying wonders" connected with the relics, shrines of pilgrimage, and false miracles of the Papacy : their name is legion, and their folly is exceeded by their guilt. V. Persecutions. '\A''e must pass on to note its persecutions of the saints, for in the prophecies of Antichrist under consideration, this feature is prominently conspicuous. Daniel says of the " little horn " that "he shall 7acar out the saints of the Most High, and they shall be given into his hand." And John says, " It was given • Wylie's " Papacy," p. 414. FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. 2or him to make war with the saints, and to overcome tliem," and that he "opened his mouth to blaspheme," or speak evil of them. Now it is a notorious fact that the Church of Rome con- siders heresy {i.e., any dissent from her teachings,) the worst crime of which a man can be guilty ; she asserts that no heretic can be saved. She teaches that no faith is to be kept with heretics, that they are to be cut off from all social intercourse, deprived of all natural, civil, and political rights ; that they forfeit all claim and right to their property ; that they are to be put to death, and that if they have died a natural death, their very bones and dust are to be taken up and burnt. And who are to be regarded as heretics? Let the bull In Ccena Domim (or, "at the supper of the Lord") answer. Every Thursday of Passion Week, that is the day before Good Friday, this bull is read in the presence of the Pope, Car- dinals, Bishops, and a crowd of people. His Holiness appears with a pair of peacock's feathers, one on each side of his head, and when the bull is finished, flings a lighted torch into the court of the palace, to make the effect of the anathema the more dreadful. The object of the bull, as defined by Pope Paul in., is "to preserve the purity of the Christian re- ligion, and to maintain the unity of the faithful." The following is one of its clauses. "We excommunicate and anathematize in the name of God Almighty, Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, and by tlie authority of the blessed Apostles, Peter and Paul, and by our own, all Hussites, Wicklifjites, Liitheratis, Zuinglians, Calvinists, Anabaptists, Huguenots, Tn'ni. tartans, and apostates from the faith, and all other heretics, by whatsoever name they are called, and of whatsoever sect they be, as also their adherents, receivers, favourers, and generally all defenders of them ; together with all who without our authority, or that of the Apostolic See, know- ingly read, keep, print, or any way for any cause whatsoever, publicly or privately, on any pretext or colour, defend their books, containing heresy or treating of religion." 202 FORETOLD AXD FULFILLED. These are the principles of Popery, as stated by acknowledged authorities of her church, and pronounced applicable to all times. As to ikit practice of this unchangeable church, there is not a statement in the follcninng quotation lohich history does ?ioi abund- antly substantiate. " As some luxurious emperors of Rome ex- hausted the whole art of pleasure, so that a reward was promised to any who should invent a new one ; so have Romish perse- cutors exhausted all the art of pain, so that it will now be diffi- cult to discover or invent a new kind of it, which they have not already practised upon those marked out for heretics. They have been shot, stabbed, stoned, drowned, beheaded, hanged, drawn, quartered, impaled, burnt, or buried alive, roasted on spits, baked in ovens, thrown into furnaces, tumbled over precipices, cast from the tops of towers, sunk in mire and pits, starved with hunger and cold, hung on tenter hooks, sus- pended by the hair of the head, by the hands or feet, stuffed and blown up with gunpowder, ripped with swords and sickles, tied to the tails of horses, dragged over streets and sharp flints, broken on the wheel, beaten on anvils with hammers, blown with bellows, bored with hot irons, torn piecemeal by red-hot pincers, slashed with knives, hacked with axes, hewed with chisels, planed with planes, pricked with forks, stuck from head to foot with pins, choked with water, lime, rags, urine, excre- ments, or mangled pieces of their own bodies crammed down their throats, shut up in caves and dungeons, tied to stakes, nailed to trees, tormented with lighted matches, scalding oil, burning pitch, melted lead, etc. They have been flayed alive, had their flesh scalped and torn from their bones ; they have been trampled and danced upon, till their bowels have been forced out, their guts have been tied to trees and pulled forth by degrees ; their heads twisted with cords till the blood, or even their eyes started out ; strings have been drawn through their noses, and they led about like swine, and butchered like sheep. To dig out eyes, tear off nails, cut off ears, lips, tongues, arms, breasts, etc., has been but ordinary sport with FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. 203 Rome's converters and holy butchers. Persons have been compelled to lay violent hands on their dearest friends, to kill or to cast into the fire their parents, husbands, wives, children, etc., or to look on whilst they have been most cruelly and shamefully abused. Women and young maids have also suf- fered such barbarities, accompanied with all the imaginable indignities, insults, shame, and pungent pangs, to which their sex could expose them. Tender babes have been whipped, starved, drowned, stabbed, and burnt to death, dashed against trees and stones, torn limb from limb, carried about on the point of spikes and spears, and thrown to the dogs and swine." If such treatment as this, inflicted on successive generations of disciples of Christ, for centuries together, be not " wearing out the saints of the Most High," what could be ? Plistoiy afford? no parallel, for the Pagan persecutions were brief in comparison to the Papal. The following is one of the authorized curses, published in the Romish Pontifical, to be pronounced on heretics by Romish priests, "May God Almighty and all his saints curse them, with the curse with which the devil and his angels are cursed. Let them be destroyed out of the land of the living. Let the vilest of deaths come upon them, and let them descend alive into the pit. Let their seed be destroyed from the earth ; by hunger, and thirst, and nakedness, and all distress, let them perish. May they have all misery, and pestilence, and torment. Let all they have be cursed. Always and everywhere let them be cursed. Speaking and silent let them be cursed. Within and without let them be cursed. By land and by sea let them be cursed. From the crown of the head to the sole of the foot, let them be cursed. Let their eyes become blind, let their ears become deaf, let their mouth become dumb, let their tongue cleave to their jaws, let not their hands handle, let not their feet walk. ].et all the members of the body be cursed. Cursed let them be standing, lying, from this time forth for ever; and thus let their candle be extinguished in the presence of God, at the day of judgment 204 FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. Let their burial be with dogs and asses. Let hungry wolves devour their corpses. Let the devil and his angels be their companions for ever. Amen, amen ; so be it, so let it be." Entire volumes would be requisite to give an adequate idea of the way in which the Papacy has worn out and overcome the saints of the Most High, by her cruel persecutions. The Apocalypse presents us with two great companies of martyrs (Rev. vi. 9 ; xv. 2) one slain by Pagan Emperors, on account of their testimony against heathen idolatry ; the other slain by Christian Popes, on account of their testimony against Chris- tian idolatry, against the corruptions and false doctrines of the Papacy. The latter company in number enormously exceeds the forvicr; it cannot be numbered by hundreds, or by thousands, or by tens of thousands, or by hundreds of thousands, or even by millions ; we must rise to tens of viillions, to express the multitude of the saints of Christ, whose blood has been shed, by the self-styled Vicar of Christ on earth ! The Inquisition, — a name at which humanity has learned to shudder, — is a long and supremely cruel and wicked his- tory compressed into one word ! Instituted for the avowed purpose of suppressing heresy, it was established in every country which submitted to Papal authority. In Spain alone it has been proved by the careful statistical investi- gations of Llorente, that between the years 148 1 and 1808 over three hundred mid forty-one thousand persons were con- demned by this " Holy Office," of whom 31,912 were burned alive, 17,000 burned in effigy, and nearly 300,000 tortured and condemned to severe penances. Every Catholic country in Europe, Asia, and America, had its Inquisition, and its con- sequent unexplained arrests, indefinitely long imprisonments of mnocent persons, its secret investigations, its horrible torture chambers, and dreadful dungeons, its auto da fes, or burnings of obstinate heretics, and its thousand nameless cruelties and injustices. When the French took Toledo, and broke open the In- FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. 205 quisition prison there, we read, " Graves seemed to open, and pale figures like ghosts issued from dungeons which emitted a sepulchral odour. Bushy beards hanging down over the breast, and nails grown like birds' claws, disfigured the skeletons, who with labouring bosoms inhaled, for the first time for a long series of years, the fresh air. Many of them were reduced to cripples, the head inclined forward, and the arms and hands hanging down, rigid and helpless : they had been confined in dens so low they could not rise up in them : ... in spite of all the care of the surgeons, many of them expired the same day. The light of the sun made a particularly painful impres- sion on the optic nerve. , . . On the following day General Lasalle minutely inspected the place, attended by several officers of his staff. The number of machines for torture . . . thrilled even men inured to the battle-field with horror ; only one of these, unique in its kind for refined cruelty, seems deserving of more particular notice. " In a recess in a subterraneous vault, contiguous to the private hall for examinations, stood a wooden figure, made by the hands of monks, and representing the Virgin Mary. A gilded glory encompassed her head, and in her right hand she held a banner. It struck us all, at first sight, as suspicious, that, notwithstanding the silken robe, descending on each side in ample folds from her shoulders, she should wear a sort of cuirass. On closer scrutiny, it appeared that the fore part of the body was stuck full of extremely sharp nviils and small narrow knife-blades, with the points of both turned towards the spectator. The arms and hands were jointed ; and machinery behind the partition set the figure in motion. One of the servants of the Inquisition was compelled, by command of the General, to work the machine, as he termed it. When the figure extended her arms, as tliough to press some one most lovingly to her heart, the well-filled knapsack of a Polish grenadier was made to supply the place of a living victim. The statue hugged it closer and closer; and when the attendant, agreeably to orders, made the figure un- 2o6 FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. clasp her arms and return to her former position, tlie knap- sack was perforated to the depth of two or three inches, and remained hanging on the points of the nails and knife-blades. To such an infernal purpose, and in a building erected in honour of the true faith, was the Madonna rendered sub- servient !" Gigantic enterprises of extermination of Christian confes- sors were from time to time undertaken by the Popes of Rome. Witness the bloody *' crusade," against the Albigenses, de- scribed by Sismondi, and the religious wars against the Wal- den»es, narrated by Monastier and others. Pope Alexander III. began the persecution against these '*' saints," whose only crime was, that they held the truth of tlie Gospel and read the Scriptures ; he confined himself to excommunications, anathe- mas, and decrees, by which they were rendered incapable of holding offices of trust, honour, or profit, and by which their lands were seized, and their goods confiscated. Innocent III., finding that they grew and prospered in spite of this, instigated sterner repressive measures ; and the fierce and bloodthirsty cruelty with which his behests were obeyed, has added to history one of its very darkest chapters. The populous and beautiful Val Louise (Dauphiny) was deserted on the approach of the Papal army, the Waldenses fleeing to the caves of the mountains. They were followed, caught, thrown headlong over the precipices, dashed to pieces ; others who took refuge in caves where their persecutors could not follow them, were suffocated with the smoke of huge fires, lit in the cavern's mouth ; 3000 men, women, and children, with 400 infants, were found so smothered in one cave, at one time ! At tlie Lateran Council, a.d. 1179, ^ decree was issued against all heretics of whatever name, anthematizing them, and forbidding any to harbour them while alive, or give them Christian burial when dead. Lucius III, gave them up to the secular arm, and to the Inquisition, for detection and suppres- sion. Innocent III. charged every bishop to gird himself for the work of extermination; and to employ bo'h princes and FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. 207 populace in the cause. Then followed the proclamation of a Crusade, with all its horrors, against the faithful witnesses for the truth. At the siege and sack of Beziers alone, sixty thou- sand Protestants were slain, and this was a specimen of the whole crusade. Vassals, were by the Pope absolved from allegiance to their superiors, should these latter refuse to join in the work of extermination ; the lands and goods of heretics, were given to their murderers ; and plenary indulgence to the day of death, was granted to every one taking part in the persecution. The dreadful sufferings mflicted on the peaceful and in- dustrious Vaudois, in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, are too well known to need repetition. The wretched villagers, surprised in the night, and hunted from rock to rock, by the light of the flames which were consuming their homes, escaped one snare, to fall into another. Surrender did not save the men from slaughter, nor the women from brutal outrage at which nature revolts ! All were forbidden to afford succour to the fugitives. At Cabrieres more thau 700 men were butchered in cold blood, and the women were burned alive in their houses. The "bloody ordinance of Gastaldo," issued in 1655, de- creed, that all who would not embrace the Catholic faith, must quit the valleys within a few days. Upwards of 1000 families were driven by this edict from their homes, in the depth of winter, to the shelterless recesses of the Alpine heights. The general to whom the execution of the edict was entrusted, fearing the consequences, if the Vaudois should resist in the defiles of their mountain passes, resorted to treachery, per- suaded the villages, by fair promises, to receive his 15,000 soldiers in small detachments ; and when the simple, unsuspi- cious people, complied with his desire, he ordered the massacre, which filled Protestant Europe with horror. Four thousand victims suffered death, under cruelties too horrible to relate, and the carnage was repeated in valley after valley. In 1686, a fresh persecution was organised against the re- 2o3 FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. maining Vaudois, by the Duke of Savoy ; terrible devastation was carried again into their quiet vales ; unheard-of barbarities committed, on every age and sex ; life could be saved only by submission to overwhelming force, and a remnant did submit. The whole Protestant population were consigned to prison, and their lands, houses, and possessions, were divided among the Catholic soldiers of Victor Amadeus. The gaols were so crowded, and the treatment of the prisoners so cruel, that multitudes of the poor captives perished ; they slept on bare bricks, in dungeons thronged to suffocation, in the intense heat of summer; and the disease and death engendered were horrible in the extreme, so that in six months only 3000 of the Vaudois survived. Urgent representations from the Pro- testant powers of Europe, procured the liberation of this remnant ; but the wretched exiles were sent out destitute, after having been, in many cases, deprived of their children, and of their pastors. They turned their steps to Switzerland, and had to make their way over the Alps, in the depth of winter ; hundreds perished of cold and hunger on the rodd. Three years later, a little band of eight hundred of these intrepid exiles, made their way back to their valleys, under the leader- ship of Arnaud, who himself recounts their triumph over apparently insuperable difficulties. * Is further proof of the persecuting spirit of the Roman Pon- tiffs needed? Look at Ireland in 1641, when the Romanist Bishops, proclaimed a "war of religion," and incited the people by every means in their power, to massacre the Pro- testants. North, south, east, and west, throughout the island, Protestant blood flowed in rivers ; houses were reduced to ashes, villages and towns all but destroyed, in the deadly strife ; the very cattle of the Protestants were inhumanly tortured ; the only burial allowed to the martyrs was the burial of the living, and their persecutors took a fiendish delight, in hearing their cries and groans, issuing from the * " Gloricusc Rentrcc dcs Vaudois dans Icurs Vallecs " : Arnaud. FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. :o9 earth. Popish children were taught to pluck out the eyes of their Protestant playmates, to hack their little limbs, and hunt them to death. Some were forced to murder their own re- latives, and then butchered themselves over the bleeding remains ; the last sounds that reached their dying ears, being the savage assurances of the priests, that these agonies were but the commencement of eternal torment, Dublin alone escaped, and became a refuge for the distressed, but all its Popish inhabitants were forbidden, under pain of the direst curse, to afford the slightest succour to the sufferers. Thou- sands died of cold and hunger ; thousands more emigrated, and perished in the wintry weather, from hunger and exposure. In Armagh, four thousand Protestants were drowned; in Cavan, the road for twelve miles together was stained red with the gory track of the wounded fugitives ; sixty children were abandoned in the flight, by parents fiercely hunted by the blood-hounds of the Papacy, who declared that any who helped or even buried these little ones, should be buried by their sides ; seventeen adults were buried alive at Fermanagh, and in Kilkenny seventy-two. In the province of Ulster alone, upwards of one hundred and fifty-four thousand Protestants, were massacred or expelled from Ireland. O'Nicl, the Romish Primate of all Ireland, declared this rebellion to be " a pious and lawful war;" and Pope Urban VIIL, by a bull, dated May, 1643, granted "full and absolute remission of all their sins," to those who had taken part in " gallantly doing what in them lay, to extirpate and wholly root out, the pestiferous leaven of heretical contagion," * But France was the scene of the greatest national crime which even the Papacy has ever instigated and approved, the MASSACRE OF St. BARTHOLOMEW'S Day, planned by the infamous Catherine de Medicis, and ordered by her weak and wretched son, Charles IX, The horrible story of this unparalleled atrocity, is too well known to need recounting * " History of tlh.AUcmpts of the Irish l'n]-)ists to Extirpate the Protest- ants ill the kingdoia ot Ireland," ]iy Sir John Temple, Master of tlie Rolls, P FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. here. In Paris alone the blood of over ten thousand innocent Protestant citizens, deluged the streets, and for a whole week the shouts of " Kill, kill," resounded on every hand. In Rouen from one to two thousand were slaughtered ; and a similar number at Lyons, at Orleans five hundred ; every town and village became a scene of carnage. Some writers compute that at least one hundred thousand persons fell in this terrible massacre ; others put the number lower. At the most moderate calculation, thirty to forty thousand Pro- testants, perished on account of their faith, in that fatal month of August, 1572. All the Princes of Europe ex- pressed their indignation at the foul treachery, excepting the King of Spain and the Pope. The former wrote to congratu- late Charles IX., on the " triumph of the Church militant," which his conduct had secured. The Pope, Gregory XIII., who was privy to the plot, celebrated a Te Deum on hearing the news, ordered a jubilee, and a solemn procession, which he accompanied himself, to thank God for this glorious success ; he sent a nuncio to Paris to congratulate the king, had a medal struck in memory of the happy event, and a picture of the massacre, painted and hung in the Vatican. A scroll at the top contained a Latin inscription to the effect, The Pontiff approves the vairder of Coligny. Tremendous as this blow had been, it did not crush Pro- testantism in France ; a twelfth part of the entire population of the country were still attached to the Reformed religion. Henry IV., on ascending the throne, issued, in 1598, the Edict of Nantes, which placed Protestants on an equal footing with Catholics in regard to civil rights, and the free exercise of their religion. The Huguenots soon began to recover from the effects of past persecutions ; but the gleam of prosperity was of short duration. With the murder of Henry IV. it passed away, and by the loss of La Rochelle the political power of the Protestants was extinguished. Oppression and injustice gradually increased, till, on the accession of Louis XIV., they were so crallinc, tl:at ei::iit hundred thousand of tlie best FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. Huguenot families of France, emigrated to England and other countries, to find the liberty to worship God denied them in their own. At last, in 16S5, the Edict of Nantes, and all the other concessions made to the Reformed, were revoked completely; their churches were demolished; their meetings jn-ohibited ; their schools closed ; their children, from five to sixteeij, taken from them to be educated as Catholics ; while at the same time they were forbidden to emigrate. A reward of five thousand five hundred livres was oft'ered, for information leading to the capture of any one of the Huguenot preachers. Persecution waxed hotter and hotter; secret meetings, sur- prised by the dragoons, were at once turned into scenes of butchery and slaughter. Incredible tortures were invented, and cruelties, the recital of which is almost impossible, were perpetrated by the Romish party, on their unoffending fellow- subjects. The Protestants, driven to desperation, rose at last in the Cevennes, and in 1702, the war of the " Camisards " began. A Huguenot historian of this dreadful civil war, says, " Never did hell in the direst persecution, invent or employ means so diabolical and inhuman as the dragoons, and the monks who head them, have used to destroy us. These cruelties were general in France, but most violent in our Cevennes." The Pope, Clement XL, did all in his power to secure the utter extinction of the persecuted Camisards. He promised complete exemption from the pains of purgatory, to all who took up arms to exterminate " the accursed and exe- crable race." For three years this cruel crusade continued, till the fair and fruitful hills and valleys of the Cevennes, were turned into desolation, and the Protestants completely crushed. Time and space fail to tell the sickening and similar stories of the papal persecutions in Spain and Portugal, in Savoy, in Poland, in Bohemia, and in the Thirty Years' War in Germany ; the horrible persecutions of the Emperor Charles V., and above all of the dark deeds of the Papacy, wrought through the Infamous Duke of Alva, in the Low Countries. Let the thrill- inslv interestiuGr storv of tlie holv heroism of hundreds and 212 FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. thousands of Christian martyrs, as told in Motley's " Dutcli Republic," add its testimony to the fact, that the Papal power has fulfilled the inspired prediction, " he shall wear out the saints of the Most High," and " make war with the saints and over- come them ;" let Foxe's " Book of Martyrs " do the same ; let the records of the Lollard persecution in our own land, and of the reign of " bloody" Mary, do the same ; let Mexico, and^ Abys- sinia, and India, tell their tales of the Holy Inquisition and its doings, and of the Jesuits and their proceedings ; and let Italy itself unveil the scenes that Ferrara, and Venice, and Parma, and Calabria have witnessed, in confirmation of the fact. In the mouth of many many witnesses, the charge is proved, and one single statement makes all argument on the subject needless. // has bee?i calculated that the Popes of Rome have, directly or indirectly, slain on account of their faith, fifty millions of martyrs ; fifty millions of men and women who re- fused to be parties to Romish idolatries, who held to tlie Bible as the Word of God, and who loved not their lives unto death, but resisted unto blood, striving against sin. VI. DOMIXIOX. One of the most marked features of the great power of evil predicted intlie four prophecies we are considering, is, its wide DOMINION. Of this revived head of the Roman earth we read, (Rev. xiii. 7,) "power was given him, over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations " ; and other clauses in the chapter show that so absolute was this power to be, tliat all, small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, were to be brought into subjection to it, and that it would become almost impossible, for those who refused such subjection, to exist; they would not even be per- mitted to buy or sell. A peculiar mark of the nature of tliis power is also given. The subjection yielded to it would be a voluntary one. It is said of the ten horns, that they shall " have one mind, and shall ^^ivc tlicir power and strength unto tlie FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. Beast '"' ; that is, it is predicted that the kingdoms into which the Roman earth would be divided, on the fall of the Empire, would voluntarily place themselves, in some sense, under the dominion of this final form of Roman power. Their subjection would not be eftected by conquest, but by the arts of persua- sion and subtle iniluence. They would be deceived and cajoled into submission, by fair words, by false miracles, by lying wonders, by superstitious fears, and by the influence of others, acting on behalf of this power, rather than by its owii direct efforts. This feature is so peculiar, so unlike the analogous features of the three first Beasts or Empires of Daniel, whose dominion was acquired by devouring, pushing, running furiously, smit- ing, breaking, stamping in pieces, in a word, by exercising physical force, instead of subtle spiritual influence, that it serves at once to indicate the power intended. The Papacy is the only great political power, which has ever held sway over all kindreds, tongues, and nations, without having to fight for it, and with the consent of the subjected kingdoms. The pro- found ignorance of the dark ages, so zealously fostered by the Papacy, created a degree of superstition, which rendered kings and peoples alike, willingly obedient to this power, which boldly claimed to be supernatural, and to exercise dominion in heaven and in hell, as well as on earth, and over the souls, as well as over the bodies of men ; and that both for time and for eternity. The prophecy further distinctly intimates, that this power will not be universal or all-inclusive, even in the lands where it should prevail. It would be resisted by a certain class : " all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, ^vhose names are 7iot 7vritten in the book of life of tJic Lamb slain from t/ie foundation of the 7uorld." This foretells that the godly — " the saints" — the chosen and called and faitliful, and they alone, will refuse to bow to this power ; and the vision shows also, that they will do it at the risk, and too often at the cost of the loss of life itself. How literally and fearfully this prediction has been fulfilled in the history of the Pa- 214 FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. pacy, the preceding outline of the persecutions inflicted on so-called " heretics," shows. The extent and the character of Papal dominion, during the dark ages, is, in our days, little realized. It is not easy, gazing on the rotten stump of an old oak, to picture to one's self what the tree was in the days of its glorious youth, and of its mighty maturity ; how its immense branches shot out on every side, overshadowing a thousand lower growths ; how the tempests attacked it in vain, and the hurricanes only rooted it more firmly in the soil. How beautiful it looked in its light green robe in spring ; how magnificent in its ruddy autumnal brown ; how generation after generation of birds sheltered amid its branches, and of wild boars fed upon its acorns. The cen- turies that have rolled over the tree have left little trace of what it was, and yet the very size of the stump tells the tale of its bygone might and glory. It is just so with the power of the Roman Pontiffs. The world can smile now at the puerility of the proud and preposterous pretensions, of the poor old man who occupies the chair of St. Peter, in his Vatican prison in Rome. It listens to his loud claim to infallibility with a laugh of con- tempt, and to his fierce anathemas on science, and literature, and social and religious liberty, with the calm and compassion- ate scorn, with which the wanderings of a lunatic are regarded. Lut of yore it was quite another thing. Every utterance of the tiara-crowned monarch was heard with awe, every command was implicitly obeyed. Men trembled under his curse, and gloried in his benediction, as if they had been those of Deity. The thunders of his interdicts shook the nations, and the fires of his excommunications spread death and destruction abroad. The imperial edicts of the Emperors Justinian and Ehocas gave the Popes of Rome a legal power in all religious matters ; and very early the various Gothic princes of Western Christen- dom showed a disposition to yield submission to the Roman Pon- tift", as children to a father, or inferiors to a superior. Already, in the eighth century', Gregory II. boasted to the Greek Em- peror, " all the kings of the west reverence the Pope as a God FOEETOLD AND FULFILLED. on eartJi^' and facts fully justified the assertion. Pepin, for example, when aspiring to the crown of France, prayed the Po])c to authorize his usurpation ; and as soon as he had done so, the Franks, and indeed the whole Western World, recognised his title. Even the great Emperor Charlemagne, was willing to receive from the Roman Pontiff his crown and dominion, " The Lord John, apostolic and universal Pope," says the Council of Pavia, "hath at Rome elected, and anointed with the holy oil, Charlemagne, as Emperor." The western kings of Europe accepted the position of subserviency to tlic Sovereign Pontiff, by admitting into their coronation oaths a promise, '^ to be faithful and submissive to the Popes, and the Roman Church." In its earlier days the Papacy, restrained by princes from exer- cising civil dominion, was equally restrained by the indepen- dence of bishops, and the authority of councils, from assuming despotic power, even in the church. " From the time of Leo IX.," says Mosheim, " the Popes employed every method which the most artful ambition could suggest, to remove these limits, and to render their dominion both despotic and universal." Hildebrand, one of the most ambitious, sagacious, crafty, and arrogant of men, when he became Pope under the title of Gregory VII., " looked up to the summit of universal empire, with a wistful eye, and laboured up the ascent with uninter- rupted ardour and invincible perseverance." He laboured in- dcfatigably to render the universal church, subject to the des- potic government of the Pontiff alone, as well as to submit to his jurisdiction the emperors, kings, and princes of the earth, and to render their dominion tributary to the see of Rome. Even when the Pope reclaimed a crown he had con- ferred, he was often met with the most abject submission. The Emperors Rodolphus and Otho, of Germany, not onl}- received the crown as a Papal grant, on the Pope's depo- sition of previous emperors, but they resigned, at his bidding, the crowns so received. Peter II. of Arragon, and John, king of England, and other monarchs also, gave up their indcpen- 2iG FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. dence, that tl'Cy might receive back their reahns as vassals of the Pope. " Uiider the sa:crdotal monarchy of St. Peter," says Gibbon, *' the nations began to resume the practice of seeking on the banks of the Tiber, their kings, their laws, and tlie oracles of their fate." And similarly, in speaking of the first Norman king of Sicily, he says, "The nine kings of the Latin world might disclium their new associate, unless he were consecrated by the authority of the supreme Pontiff." If kings and emperors bowed thus before the Pope, it will easily be believed that the reverence of the common people for his person and office, and their submission to his arrogant and blasphemous pretensions, was complete. " Not in respect of his power in secular things, but in things much higher, who knows not of the universal reverence and faith in his blas- phemous pretensions exhibited throughout the long middle ages by Christendom ? Look at the thronging multitudes on pilgrimage to Rome, in assurance of the salvation he promises them ! Look at their reception of his dogmas in matters of faith, as very oracles from heaven ! Look at their purchasing of his indulgences with their often hard earned money, in the belief of delivering thereby the captive souls of departed rela- tives, as well as their o\vn souls, from the pains of purgatory and of hell ! " * Look at the way in which thousands of all classes engaged in crusades and religious wars at the bidding of the Popes, and refused aid, even to their nearest and dearest friends, if they came under his ban ! From the most private domestic relations of individuals, to the most public national acts of empires, all fell under the rule, direct or indirect, of the Papacy. It was the last solemn united act, before the Reforma- tion, of the deputies of Christendom assembled in. council, to subscribe the bull Ujiavi Sanction, which declares that as there IS BUT ONE BODY OF THE CHURCH AND CHRISTENDOM, SO THERE IS BUT ONE HEAD, THE ViCAR OF ChRIST — THE POPE ; AND THAT IT IS ESSENTIAL TO THE SALVATION OF EVERY HUMAN * Elliott, vol. iii., p. 171. FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. 217 BEING, TO DE SUBJECT TO THE RoMAN PONTIFF ; and HO Sub- sequent Council ever revoked this decree. It is clear, then, that a widespread and all-pervading power, of the most despotic, absolute, and blasphemous character, was wielded for a thousand years by the Popes of Rome, and is claimed by them still ; that this power was sub- mitted to by all the nations of Western Christendom for many centuries ; and that it is still acknowledged by all Roman Catholics everywhere. The late Pope, in ad- dressing the people of Rome on one occasion, congratu- lated them, that they had more than two hundred, viillions of fellow subjects elsewhere, speaking all languages, and dwelling in all nations. In the Papacy, has therefore been fulfilled to the letter, and in the most marvellous way, the prediction, " Power was given unto him over all kindreds and tongues and nations." * The growth of this power to these gigantic proportions, was a most singular phenomenon. Tyndale the Reformer speak- ing of it, says : " To see how the holy father came \\\), mark the ensample of the ivy ! First it springcth up out of the earth, and then awhile creepeth along by the ground, till it * The application of this prophecy to the Popedom has sometimes been doubted, because of the wide universality of this expression. Lut com- parison witli other scriptures removes this difficuhy. We read in Matthew iii. 5 : "Then went out unto him Jerusalem and all Judca, and all the region round about Jordan, and were bajitized." And again. Acts ix. 35, "And all that dwelt in Lydda and Saron saw him, and turned to the Lord." "All " in these passages must be taken with /nnitations, which are not ex- pressed. So in Daniel iii. 7, it is said that when Nebuchadnezzar set up liis image, "all the people, the nations, and the languages fell down and worshipped." Now, the second verse of the chapter shows, that only the princes and governors of those nations were present ; they are regarded as representatives of their people. In the same way all Christendom submitted to the Popes of Rome, through the Councils which represented them. The exception in the text of those whose names are written in tlic Lamb's book of life shows that — ^just as all were not Israel that were of Israel — so all were not Papists that were subject to the Papacy. This must never be for- gotten. At the last the cry goes forth, " Come out of her, viy people,'" Ti. call which imjjlies that — as Lot dwelt in Sodom — so some true believers will be found in the Roman Catholic system, even just prior to its final destruc- tion. 21 8 FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. find a great tree. Then it joineth itself beneatli, unto the body of the tree, and creepeth up a little and a little, fair and softly. At the beginning, while it is yet thin and small, the burden is not perceived ; it seemeth glorious to garnish the tree in winter. But it holdeth fast withal, and ceascth not 10 climb up till it be at the top, and even above all. And then it sendeth its branc'hes along by the branches of the tree, and overgroweth all, and waxeth great, heavy, and thick ; and it sucketh the moisture so sore out of the tree and his branches, that it choaketh and stifleth them. And then the foul, stink- ing ivy waxeth mighty in the stump of the tree, and becomcth a seat and a nest for all unclean birds and for blind owls which hawk in the daik, and dare not come to the light. " Even so the Bishop of Rome, now called Pope, at the begin- ning crope along upon the earth, and every man trod on him. As soon as there came a Christian emperor, he joined himself to his feet and kissed them, and crope up a little, with begging now this privilege, now that. . . . And thus with flatter- ing and feigning and vain superstition, under the name of St. Peter, he crept up, and fastened his roots in the heart of the emperor, and with his sword climbed up above all his fellow bishops, and brought them under his feet. And as he subdued them by the emperor's sword, even so after tJicy were sworn faithful, he, by their means, climbed up above the etnperor, and subdued him also, and made hvn stoop unto his feet and kiss them ! . . . And thus the Pope, the father of all hypocrites, hath with falsehood and guile perverted the order of the world, and turned things upside down." VII. Before closing this chapter, we must notice the dootn of the great power of evil predicted in the fourfold propjiccy we are considering. It consists of two parts, gradual consumption, followed by sudden and final destruction. The latter, being still future, affords no opportunity of comparing the prophetic announce- ment with the historical fulfilment ; but the former, being already partially fulfilled, and still in progress of fulfilment; FORETOLD AXD FULFILLED. 219 does, and the correspondence between prediction and event is nowhere more clear and unmistakable. In Daniel, in Thessalonians, and /// tJie Apocalypse, the final destruction of this last form of the Roman power, is connected with the personal appearing of Christ to establish his millennial kingdom. But in each prophecy it is also intimated that a consuming and destroying process, would go on for some time, previously to the end, so that the once mighty power would be weakened and impoverished, before it is finally destroyed. *' They shall take away his dominion, to consiune and destroy it unto the end " (Dan. vii. 26). " Whom the Lord shall con- sume with the Spirit of his mouth, and destroy with the bright- ness of his coming " (2 Thess. ii. S). " The ten horns shall hate the whore, and shall make Jicr desolate and naked, and shall eat her flesh, and burn her with fire " (Rev. xvii. 16). The final destruction of the power in question is described in Rev. xix. 20, "The beast was taken and cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone." This is his destruction with the brightness of Christ's coming ; and the consu7nption by the spirit of his mouth, must have preceded this final judgment. Pharaoh and the hosts of Egypt were similarly wasted and consumed by the ten plagues, before they were whelmed in the waters of the Red Sea. The consuming process is figured in the Apocalypse as taking place under the outpouring of certain vials of wrath, on the kingdom of the Beast, and on his followers. We inquire, then, whether there have been in the history of the Papacy any events answering to this emblem, whether any process of consumption is distinctly traceable, any wasting to decay of its resources, any conspicuous diminution of its do- minion, and reduction of its influence and authority. The facts of the case are so notorious, that it is needless to set them forth in detail. The political power of the Roman Pontiffs, once, as we have seen, a dread reality in Euroi)c, is gone. It is a memory of the past, not an existing fact. The territorial possessions of the Pope arc gone ; the States of the 220 FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. Church form part of the dominions of the king of Italy, and Rome itself has become his capital. Within the last twenty years all the Concordats made between the Pope and the various countries of Europe, have been brought to an end. The immense landed property, belonging to the various orders of monks and nuns on whom the Papacy relied as its universal agents, has all been confiscated and secularized in Italy, in France, in England, and in other lands. In 15 13, when the great Lateran Council was held, there was not a "heretic " to be found. There are now nearly eighty millions of Pro- testants, who abjure Papal doctrines and practices. The dominion of the Popes, over the bodies and minds of men, is therefore marvellously diminished, though the latter is not yet destroyed. And it is specially worthy of note that the means by which this conspicuous and undeniable " consumption " of Papal power has been accomplished, are precisely the means speci- fied by the Apostle Paul in Thcssalonians. He says that the Lord shall consume this evil power by the spirit of his 7nouth, i.e., by his word. Holy Scripture is of course the form in which the word or spirit of the Lord's mouth, retains a sensible existence, and influences human society. " The words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life." Does not the extreme jealousy with which the Papacy has always endeavoured to bury the Bible in an unknown tongue, or to undo its teachings by false interpretations, betray its inveterate antagonism to the power destined to "consume" it? " There is an instinct of apprehension, a consciousness, which, antecedent to experience, divines danger ; it seems discernible in the alarm with which Romanism recoils from Holy Scrip- ture ,^ " * The Creed of Pius IV.— that creed, a belief in which is, ac- cording to Papal declaration, essential to salvation — expressly "The Apostasy": O'Sullivan. FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. states that the Bible is not for the people : " Whosoever will be saved," must renounce it. It is a forbidden book. Bible Societies are "Satanic contrivances." Bible burnings are most Catholic demonstrations. All this dread of Scripture, all this violent opposition to its circulation, is a plain proof that the Papacy recognises in tlie Word of God its worst antagonist. Experience shows it is right. Wherever the Word of God has free course, the power of the Papacy is at an end. The Reformation sprang from a recovered Bible ; and wherever, as in Scotland, the popular mind is imbued with Scripture, Romanism has no chance. It is the absence of Bible knowledge that enables the Papacy to retain its sway, in Spain and other European countries, in Mexico, in Brazil, and in parts of Ireland. The fact was stated in evidence before the Commissioners of Education, that in 1S46, among 400 students attending Maynooth College, only ten had Bibles or Testaments, while every student was required to provide himself with a copy of the works of the Jesuits, Bailly and Delahogue. The failure of the Hibernian Schools, in which the Bible without note or comment was used, was attributed by Lord Stanley to that fact alone : the priests exerted " themselves, with energy and success, against a system to which they were in princii)le opposed." The parents were told that it was " mortal sin " to send their children to such schools ; and if they persisted, the sacrament was withheld from them, even when dying. Pius IX., in his Encyclical Letter of 1S50, speaks of Bible study as *' poisonous reading," and urges all his venerable brethren with vigilance and solicitude to put a stop to it. A clergyman lost his wife in Rome, and wished to put a text on her tombstone. The Pope refused permission, not only on the ground that it was unlawful to express a hope of immor- tality as to a " heretic," but because it was " contrary to law, to publish in the sight of the Roman people any portion of the Word of God " ! FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. "Rome is constrained to do homage to the majesty of the Eible ; she has done her best to exile that book from the world, ■with all the treasures it contains, — its thrilling narratives, its rich poetry, its profound philosophy, its sublime doctrines, its blessed promises, its magnificent prophecies, its glorious and immortal hopes. Were any being so cruel as to ex- tinguish the light of day, and condemn the successive genera- tions of men to pass their lives amid the gloom ot an unbroken night, where would words be found strong enough to execrate the enormity ? Far greater is the crime of Rome. After the day of Christianity had dawned, she was able to cover Europe with darkness ; and by the exclusion of the Bible, to per- petuate that darkness from age to age. The enormity of this wickedness cannot be known on earth. But she cannot con- ceal from herself that, despite her anathemas, her indices cxpurgatorii^ her tyrannical edicts, by which she still attempts to wall round her territory of darkness, the Bible is destined to overcome in the conflict. Hence her implacable hostility — hostility founded to a large extent on fear. . . , To Popery a single Bible is more dreadful than an army ten thousand strong. . . . When she meets the Bible in her path, she is startled, and exclaims with terror, I know thee who thou art ! Art thou come to torment me before the time?"* For the last three hundred years, ever since the Reforma tion, the Papacy has been in process of consumption by the spirit of the Lord's mouth. It will ere long be " destroyed by the brightness of his coming." VIIL This leads us to tlie last point we must notice in our brief examination of this remarkable fourfold prophecy of the Papacy, — Its duration. The period of the dominion of the little horn, is fixed in Daniel vii. as " time, times, and the dividing of time ; " antl that of the last head of the Roman beast (which is, as wc * Wylic's " Tapacy. FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. have seen, only another symbol of the same power), as " forty and two months," the same period under a different designa- tion. This period is identical, and synchronous with, the 1260 days of parallel prophecies. Interpreted according to the year-day system, it has had a most evident fulfilment in the duration of the power of the Papacy ; and it is besides a KEY TO THE WHOLE SYSTEM OF TIMES AND SEASONS, NATURAL AND REVEALED. The entire system thus opened up, is a confirmation of the interpretation which opens it : its universal range, its exquisite internal harmonies, and its deep underlying connection with the profoundest truths of our faith, make this system a grand witness to the true interpretation of the mystic phrases which furnish the clue for its discovery. To enter more largely on this point here would be to ant ici- pate subsequent chapters. For the present we must content ourselves with asserting simply that \\\q predicted period of the great power of evil we have been considering, 1260 years, points out the Papacy as the proper fulfilment, as clearly as any of the other features. The Bishops of Rome assumed universal supremacy in the beginning of the seventh century^ and have exercised it ever since. It is a solemn fact, that these inspired prophecies, — every other prediction in which has been so marvellously fulfilled, — foretell that it will not last much longer. Its days are numbered. Its end is near. To conclude. The origin of the Papacy corresponded with every indication furnished by these four prophecies. Its cha- racter answers exactly to the singularly wicked and evil charac- ter assigned by the inspiring Spirit to the predicted power. Self-exalting utterances, great words, against God and man, have been one of its most distinguishing features ; idolatries and false doctrines have been inculcated and promulgated through- out Christendom by its instrumentality ; it has made war with the saints and overcome them, fifty millions of evangelical martyrs having been slain by its authority ; it has ruled over all the kindreds and nations of Catholic Christendom, and that 224 FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. for more than twelve centuries ; and it has for the last three hundred years been wasting to decay, undermined and ex- posed by the Reformation movement, which itself was the direct result of the revival of scriptural teachings and the dissemination of Bible truth. The Papacy was never so low, in power, in resources, in prestige, as it is at this moment. According to the Divine programme afforded by these sacred, once mysterious but now clear predictions, the Papal drama is played out. The final scene alone remains, — the destruction of the Papacy by the brightness of Christ's coming. In the face of such a fulfilment as this, — a fulfilment on so grand a scale, as to the area involved, tlie events comprised, and the time occupied, — a fulfilment affecting countless my- riads of human beings during its course of more than twelve hundred years, — a fulfilment of immense spiritual importance, to thirty or forty generations of professing Christians, throughout the world, — a fulfilment so little to have been expected, and therefore so peculiarly worthy of being made the subject of prophetic forewarning, — in the face of such a fulfilment, surely candour would admit, this is that which was spoken by the prophet ; this is that system of supernatural and soul-destroy- ing error, that dire and dreadful apostasy, revealed by the inspiring Spirit, as the principal power of evil, to arise between the first and second advents of the Lord Jesus Christ. When the four symbolic beasts were presented to Daniel, it was the fourth that arrested his gaze, and it was the " little horn " of that fourth empire, that mainly attracted his attention, and the angelic interpreter dwells with tenfold fulness on the power represented by this symbol. So when Paul predicted the future of the church on earth, it was the rise, domination and decay of this same evil power that he presented, as the main event to intervene before her rapture to meet the Lord in the air ; and so when John received the revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave to him, the central symbol of the entire group of hieroglyphs, the one which occupied the most prominent place in the prophecy, was one of this same power. FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. " the beast," the great antagonist of the Lamb and his fol- lowers. How Avorthy of such conspicuous mention in the sacred oracles, of such solemn denunciation by the Holy Ghost, — how worthy of such pre-eminent fame (or rather infamy !) among the gigantic evils that have afflicted mankind, — how deserving of every dark designation bestowed, and of the dread doom denounced, has the Papacy proved itself to be. The self- styled vicar of Christ has been his worst enemy in the world, the crowned priest on the papal throne has been the undoing of the church on earth. The system which asserts salvation impossible beyond its borders, has destroyed the spiritual and temporal well-being of untold multitudes of men. Unutterably disastrous as have been its direct effects, its millions of slaughtered saints, its myriads of deluded disciples, its indirect effects have been hardly less terrible. Ly its priestly assump- tions and pious frauds, by its notorious cupidity and mercenary practices, by its gross perversions of the truth, and unblushing corruptions of morality, by its reason-revolting dogmas, childish superstitions, and endless old wives' fables, by its uniform opposition to social progress, and its habitual alliance with political tyranny, it has brought all religion into contempt, and filled Catholic Christendom with scorners, infidels, and atheists. As to every single particular noted in the sure word of prophecy, the plainest correspondence can be traced between the fourfold prediction and the Papal fulfilment ; and we can- not refrain from deprecating most earnestly, the miscliicvous system of interpretation, which teaches that this clear, undeni- able, and grandly terrible accomplishment, is not tlic fulfil incnt intended. Standing face to face with Jesus Christ, the disciples of John inquired in their master's name, "Art Thou He that should come, or look we for another?" They were answered by deeds, not words. Tlie Lord wrought Messianic miracles in their presence, and said, " Co and tell John what thing ye have seen and heard ; " that is, lie did the deeds lidiich it had Q FCr.ETCLD 4XD FULFILLED. bcai prcdictid that the Messiah would do, and all were responsible to draw thence the inference that Hi was tJu Messiah. So, pointing to the chnrch history of the last twelve centuries, we say, lo I the Papacy has done the ^^t^ which were to be done by the oft-predicted power of e\-i], foretold in the word of God ! And we believe that Christians are responsible to draw from the historical fact, th; '".:";:;".:: .•'. P.zta^- is t\: t:-..:r that was thus fredkted. To neglect the e%'idence which proves this fact- :.'.-: :o demonstration, and to spectdate ab?ut 7~5sible fnuir^ l.:-rai fulnlments, as the intended and ma -. ;. : : : •...plishment, of these sacred symbolic prophecies, is to denude them of th - f)-ing power, and to turn their keen edge of pract:. _ - cation- If the Papacy is the real ftilnlment, if it is tke e\-il that was foresidn as of supreme importance (as it has certainly proved to be), it is surely no light matter for teachers of the word to mislead others on the point To do so., is to relieve Popery of the feariul sdgma cast on it by the spirit of prophecy, to deprive the church of the Di\ine estimate of this Anti- christian system, and to substitute instead, wild and imau- thorized speculations, about some coming man, who is, in three years and a half, to exhaust these divinely given predictions, which the church has for eighteen centuries been studying. We entreat our Futurist friends to consider, whether it is more likely that the all-wise God indited these solemn predictions for the benefit of many generations of his saints, or exclusively for the guidance of the last generation of this age ? Did He pass by unnoticed, th* gigantic and imiversally influential power, which ruled the whole of Christendom with despotic sway and inconceivably evil results for more than a thousand years, in order to describe in detail, and many times over, the doings of C7U iiuzn, the brief career of a single indiWdual, who has not yet appeared? Was it to warn the church of the nineteenth century against some short-lived Napoleon, that the Holy Ghost unveiled the future to the prophet Danieh and that the Lord Jesus gave the Apocalypse to the saintly John ? FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. The ample and repeated descriptions of this power of evil, the unparalleled denunciations against it, the solemn adjurations to the people of God, to avoid any connection with it, all forbid the idea. Not for one, but for fifty generations of saints, were these prophecies indited; not to be fulfilled on the petty scale of three years, but on the majestic one of twelve centuries; not to indicate gross material dangers, but subtle spiritual and ecclesiastical evils, of long duration, and world-wide prevalence. The coming of Antichrist is no brief future event, lying be- tween us and our blessed hope, the glorious appearing of our Saviour ; he was revealed more than a thousand years ago, he has run his course, and lasted his pre-appointed period ; for three hundred years, he has been consuming by the spirit of Christ's mouth, and of all the momentous series of events con- nected with his long-predicted career, nothing remains to be fulfilled save his final conflict with the Lamb, and destruction with the brightness of Christ's coming. To conclude. The correct interpretation of the prophecy of Bahylo7i the great, — that it is the CJiurch of Rome — confirms the above victu of this prophecy of " the beast," and is indeed the hey to the zuhole Apocalypse. There is a vast difference between the Papacy, and the corrupt church, which it founded, governed, and used as its tool ; a difference, less in degree, but similar in character, to that existing between the Head of the true church, and that church which He founded, governs, and employs as an instru- ment to accomplish his will in the world. Many things are true of the Lord Jesus, that are not true of the church which is his body, close and inseparable as is the connection between them. So, many things are true of the Popes of Rome which are not true of the Roman Catholic Church, close as is the connection between them. Widely dissimilar hieroglyphs are selected to prefigure the two, in the Apocalypse, and yet the connection between them is very clearly indicated ; they are never con- founded, yet never disjoined. Now the duration of the corrupt church is not mcntioiicd 228 FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. in this prophecy, though long duration is implied ; but her name is given, and it demonstrates with all but mathematical certainty, as we have seen, that the church intended is the Church of Rome. That church has, we know, as a matter of history, already lasted in a condition of corruption and apostasy, for more than twelve centuries. Its fall is in the Apocalypse represented as taking place under the sei'cnth vial (Rev. xvi.), and as synchronizing with the marriage of the Lamb (Rev. xix. 1-4). The power of " the beast " (or Papal dynasty) is also repre- sented as being consumed under the outpouring of the vials, while he himself and his armies arc destroyed by the advent, which synchronizes with the marriage of the Lamb. That is, " Babylon " and " the beast " are represented as coming to an end at 07ie and the same time. Their careers are also cotemporancous, for the woman is repre- sented as seated on the Roman beast — "the beast that was and is not " — that is, not old Pagan Rome, but Rome revived, in a totally new form of domination. This beast " that was and is not" is expressly said to be tJie eighth (v. 11), that is the last terrible form of revived Roman power, so fully described in chapter xiii. — the power of which we have been treating. It follows, that since the Church of Rome has already lasted more than twelve centuries, the last ruling head of the Roman world, the blasphemous, persecuting, self-exalting head or power here predicted, Jnust have been in existence for the very same period, which is indeed the duration assigned to it, in symbolic language by the prophecy — 12O0 years. Now what poiuer has actually ruled the nations of Christen- dom from Rome as its seat, during the last twelve centuries! There can ee but one reply — The Papacy : It must therefore ee the power prefigured by the symbol of "the BEAST." Further, the vials, under which Babylon and "the beast" are represented as being brought to an end, synchronize with the close of the period of the trumpets. The events prefigured FORETOLD AND FULFILLED. 229 under the earlier trumpets must therefore be sought in the previous history of Christendom ; i.e., in the time of the tindi- ininislicd power of the Papacy, and in the events whicli pre- ceded and accompanied its rise. The martyrs represented in the fifteenth chapter of the book, standing as victors on the sea of glass, having '■'gotten the vietory over the beast, and over his image, and over the number of his name," must be those slain by Papal Rome. A previous group of martyrs are represented in the sixth chapter, who must therefore be those slain by Pagan Rome in the ten great persecutions of the church by the Ccesars. Now it is under \X\^ fifth seal that this earlier company is seen under the altar, and consequently the events figured as taking place under the four previous seals, must be sought in days p7-ior to the last great persecution under Diocletian, that is, in the first three hundred years of church history. Thus we are led by clear and simple synchronisms, afforded by the book itself, to a conclusion respecting the Apocalypse, similar to that which we reached by other lines of argument ; namely, that its fulfilment is to be sought in the events of the Christian era, and that so far from all its visions, from chap, vi. to chap. xix. being still wholly future, they are almost wholly past. Nor can the force of this argument be avoided, save by denying that the Babylon of the Apocalypse represents the Church of Rome. In the remaining portion of this work we shall find all the conclusions we have reached in its three earlier parts, respecting the second advent and the millennium, the resurrection and the judgment to come, the true scope and nature of the Apocalypse, and the signification of these, its two leading prefigurations, — abundantly confirmed from independent sources, and by arguments drawn from the realms of natural science. End of Part III. PART IV. INQUIR Y INTO THE DIVINE SYSTEM OF TIMES AND SEASONS NATURAL AND REVEALED. SECTION I. Solar and Lunar Dominion Causal and Chronological. CHAPTER I. chronology, biblical and natural, is there harmony between the two? solar and lunar dominion in the inorganic world, soli-luxar control of terrestrial revolutions. — winds. — rains. — ocean currents. — tides. — electric and magnetic variations. OUR subject in this volume so far, has been sacred pro- phecy. We have observed the manner in which the Omniscient God has been pleased to reveal the future to man — progressively ; we have investigated some of the main prin- ciples, on which the symbolic predictions of Scripture should be interpreted ; and we have traced the historic fulfilment of two of the most important of them. We must now turn to the distinct yet cognate subject of chronology, and examine the times and seasons of some of the events foretold in pro- phecy, and those of Scripture in general. Every Bible student is aware, that prophecy has its chron- ology, that various periods arc assigned to events forefold by holy men of old, who spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost. Empires have their duration, dynasties and kingdoms, last for certain periods, and as predicting these. DIVINE SYSTEM OF TIMES AND SEASONS. 231 prophecy can no more be divested of the chronological ele- ment than history. Indeed prophecy being simply history anticipated, the times and seasons of the one, become in due course, those of the other ; they are two parts of one whole ; and now that history unrolls before our eyes a record extend- ing over six thousand years, very few are the prophetic periods whose fulfilment cannot be traced in some part of the scroll. But further ; there exists, not in sacred prophecy alone, but throughout the entire Bible, a system of times and seasons. Chronology is a prominent feature of the Holy Scriptures. In the account of the creation, in the narrative of the flood, in the biographies of the patriarchs, in the Mosaic economy with its legal and ceremonial enactments, in the history of the Jewish nation ; in the prophets ; in the gospels, and in the Apocalypse ; statements of time aboimd. Not only is the creation work recorded, but the time it occupied ; not only are the waters of the flood described, but we are told how many days they took to rise, and how many to fall ; how many years Noah had lived prior to the crisis, how many days he waited before he sent out the dove, and how many more before he went forth from the ark, himself. It is so throughout. In fact the science of true chronology is based upon the state- ments of Scripture : the first of chronologers,^ Clinton, accepts its data as correct, and draws from thence his conclusions as to the age of the world. Unlike the sacred books of all false religions, Bible stories are no vague myths, or fabled occur- rences, referred to some remote intangible past. The time of the events recorded is accurately measured, and they are all fitted into a framework of true chronology. And while the times and seasons of Scripture are substantial historical periods, bearing the stamp of accuracy and veracity, they form part of a series, and belong to a system, the features of whicl) it is not difficult to trace. Not only are there chronological statements in abundance in the Bible, but there is, under- lying them all a system, a peculiar system, harmonious with all the other features of that marvellous volume. 232 DIVINE SYSTEM OF TIMES AND SEASONS, A moment's reflection will satisfy every well informed person that nature has also its times and seasons ; that the outward material universe in which we dwell, and the laws which govern it, are marked by a well defined periodicily. The entire solar system is one great chronometer, the animal and vegetable worlds, are regulated by unchangeable laws in respect of time^ as well as in every other respect ; and nature being, in all its grandeur, its beauty, its complexity, its variety, its mystery, a revelation of its great Creator's wisdom and power, the system of times and seasons which characterizes it, may be called a Divine system of times ajid seasons. There is no chance in the length of celestial revolutions, or in the duration of cycles of organic change : all is regulated, fixed, appointed. " He appointed the moon for seasons, the sun knowcth his going down. Thou makest darkness and it is night, wherein all the beasts of the forest do creep forth. The sun ariscth, they gather themselves together, and lay them down in their dens." As to man, " his days are determined, the number of his months are with Thee, Thou hast appointed his bounds, that he cannot pass." As the apostle Paul proclaimed to the Athenians of old, " God hath determined the times before appointed " as well as the bounds of the habitation, of all men, and of all living things ; and He has fixed the orbit of every rolling globe in space, and timed its various revolutions. The mighty machine of the universe, has been wound up and regulated by its great Creator ; all its myriad parts keej) march and measure, and move according to the Divine will and purpose. Now if there be a system of times and seasons, in nature, which is nnqiiestio7iahly from God, and a .system also in the Bible, which claims to be a Divine revelation, it is evidently an inquiry of the deepest interest, are these two systems one 7 Can any principles or peculiarities be observed, which indicate that the two are the offspring of one and the same mind ? Is the system of nature, tlie system of the Bible ? Can the Bible system be traced in nature ? Two books are before us, one NATURAL AND REVEALED. certainly, the other professedly, the work of a given author. A. marked peculiarity pervades the latter, with which long study has made us familiar. If on examination we find the very same singular feature to be prominent in the former, who would hesitate to conclude that both were written by one hand ? We propose now, in the last part of this work, to investigate this interesting and momentous point ; to examine into the question, whether the natural system of times and seasons, is identical with, or related to the Bible system, whether the periodicity of nature, and the periodicity of Scripture, are de- monstrably two parts of one whole. The inquiry, it will be granted is a most legitimate one, for both the material universe, and the volume of inspiration are open revelations. We are not prying into hidden m}'steries, or seeking to be wise above what is written. " The secret things belong to God, but the things that are revealed, to us and to our children : " we are at liberty to study such a subject, "whoso is wise and will observe these things" shall behold more and more of the glory of God, for the diverse revelations which He has made, throw light the one on the other. Moreover a pleasing element of certainty, attaches to such a research : science astronomic, biologic, physical, botanical, chemical, optical, — science in all its branches, deals with facts, and there is no refusing the testimony of ascertained and well established facts. Nature can be watched and tested, and no baseless theories stand a chance against her silent testimony. Nor can the chronology of secular and sacred history, be made to fit a false system. It is too angular, too solid, to adapt it- self to a scheme for which it was not designed. The most remote pre-historic periods are spaced out for us by Bible statements only, but by far the larger ])art of the annals of the human race, are bathed in the double light of sacred and pro- fane history. The importance of such an investigation will scarcely be questioned. In these days of sujjcrcilious scientific contempt 234 DIVINE SYSTEM OF TIMES AND SEASONS, for Scripture, we can ill afford to leave unemployed, any single line of evidence, which may strengthen the argument for the Divine origin of the Bible. To demonstrate this, is to enable Christianity to dispense with other evidence, for if Scripture be from God, Christianity is unquestionably true. Now if Bible times and seasons harmonize with the system by which the entire universe is regulated, he will be a most uncandid and unscientific sceptic, who refuses to believe that Scripture is from God. The harmony once proved, will demand a modi- fication of many a theory of unbelief, and to account for it will tax the ingenuity of infidels. In the following pages it will be our endeavour to show, that the natural and Biblical systems are one — two parts of one whole, — and may the proof redound to the glory of God, and confirm the faith of his servants, in the inspiration of his Holy Word. We shall examine first the periodicity of nature, inorganic and organic, and subsequently that of Scripture history and prophecy, gathering from the latter strong confirmation of the views of prophetic interpretation already advocated, and con- vincing, unmistakable evidence of the nearness of the end of the age : and may the Holy Spirit, whose office it is to teach us all things, and show us things to come, Himself be our in- structor and guide ! On the very threshold of this subject, however, we are met by a question evidently so fundamental to its clear conception, that we must pause to give it a reply : — What is Time? Time is " duration set forth by measures " * ; the ticking of a clock, the beating of a pulse, the burning of a candle, the falling of sand through a certain aperture, — these, and a thou- sand similar regular movements, may serve as measures, more or less exact, of time. But its uniform and accurate measurement, being a matter of * Locke " On tlic Human Understanclincr." NATURAL AND REVEALED. 235 vast and universal importance, and standards of a great variety of lengths, being needful to beings who take an interest in the past, the present, and the future, including periods the most remote ; measures of a far more stable, accurate, regular and comprehensive character than these, are evidently needful. Such measures the great Creator has provided in the revo- lution of the heavenly bodies. The diurnal, annual, and secular movements of the globe on which we dwell, give rise to exceedingly various celestial phenomena, which as the prin- cipal hands of a complex dial plate, indicate the lapse of time. The best measures of time must of course be those which are most obvious, regular and universal, and in these and other respects, there are no standards that can for a moment compare, with the apparent and real movements of the sun and moon. The motions of the planets are slow, inconspicuous, and variable ; now forward, now retrograde ; difficult to detect, and observed by very few. The motions of the comets are still more irregular, and are for the most part altogether lost to sight ; but those of the sun and moon are universally con- spicuous, they combine regularity with variety, and revolutions of considerable rapidity, with others of a slow and stately cha- racter, including some whose periods are of enormous duration. Above all, the sun and moon exercise an unrivalled dominion in the control of terrestrial movements and changes. They combine, and that to a marvellous extent, the two distinct elements of potency and periodicitv. While they originate and rule almost all the physical changes continually taking place upon the surface of the globe, they are eminently periodic, and from the combination of these two elements it results, that they alone of all the heavenly bodies, create and control terrestrial times and seasons. ^Ve name the primary periods which they measure, days, months, years ; and all our times and seasons are either these, or multiples of these. In investigating the question of Times and Seasons, we will commence then by considering the almost boundless dominion exercised by the sun and moon, over the inorganic and organic 236 DIVINE SYSTEM OF TIMES AND SEASONS. worlds, and we will then advance to the subject of the perio- dicity of their movements, and the relation of these and other natural times and seasons, to those revealed in the Word of God. Solar and Lunar Dominion in the Inorganic World, " And God made two great lights ; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night. And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth, and to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness. And God said, let them be for signs and for seasons, and for days and years." — Gen. i. The inspired writings were never intended to reveal to men, those truths of science, which their own God-given intelli- gence would ultimately enable them, by means of humble, dili- gent, and patient observation, to discover. Yet the Scriptures never darken counsel by words without knowledge, involving scientific blunders, and they often use, in a passing way, expressions which harmonize with the teachings of the most advanced modern science. The statement above quoted, that God made the sun and moon "to RULE," is one of these. To rise to a conception of the vastness and universality of solar influence in the creation and control of inorganic and organic terrestrial change, is difficult for us even now, and must have been impossible for the ancients. Yet that this great light of our globe, is also its great ruler, is beyond all question, and is a point we must seek to estabhsh, for the sake of those who scarcely recognise its full import, before we endeavour to unfold some of the chrono- logical laws of this dominion. So numerous and important are the effects which Almighty Power accomplishes through solar and lunar agency, that the sun and moon may be said to drive i/ie whole dockioork of ter- restrial nature. The swift and ceaseless translation of the earth through space ; the curving of its path and its retention in an annual orbit ; the slow secular alteration of the direction of its axis ; the periodic donation and withdrawal of various degrees of light and heat, with resulting days, and nights, and changeful SOLAR AND LUNAR DOMINION 237 seasons ; the movement and circulation of all winds, from the gentlest zephyr to the most terrible tornado ; the circulation of all water currents, including on the one hand, the innumerable rills and rivers of the land, and on the other, the equally count- less currents of the ocean ; the whole phenomena of tides, with their varied and vasts results ; and that of rains, from the up- raising of waters in the form of vapour, and their transporta- tion as clouds, to their condensation and descent in fertilizing showers ; the formation and fall of dews, of snow, of hail ; the control of all-pervading electric, magnetic, and chemical changes ; these, together with the constant exercise of the most potent of all physical influences, in the development and sup- port of vegetable and animal life, constitute a sum of solar and lunar operations, which seems to leave but little to be effected by other agencies. It is needful that we should recall some familiar scientific facts, to justify this statement and give it its due weight. First, then, as regards the relation of soli-lunar inlluencc to {>iorganic changes, and primarily to the continual change in the earth's own position ; i.e., to the earth's varied and complicated inovcnunts, be it remembered that every atom in the universe attracts every other atom with a force inverse to the square of the distance. Such is the great and universal law of gravitation. What then must be the attractive power exercised on our globe by its closely-attendant satellite, the moon, which is a world 7chx; miles in circumference, with a mass estimated at 78,ooo,ooo,cxx>,ooo,ooo,ooo of tons ? And how stupendous and overmastering must be the attractive force brought to bear upon the earth by the supreme central orb of the system, which is 700 times greater than all the planets put together, and a million times larger than the earth itself ! A ponderous luminous globe, equal to a million worlds in magnitude, is ever exerting on our world, all its might of irresistible attraction. The globe we inhabit, vast relatively to us though it be, yields to its influence, as the wave to the wind ! The earth moves in its orbit 120 times more swiftly than a cannon ball. This almost inconceivable velocity, imparts to it, of course, an inconceivably strong impulse or tendency to fly off at a tangent, and move on in a straight line, from every point of its orbit. It is for ever struggling with tremendous energy to be free from its lord paramount, seeking, with all the force of the well-nigh irresistible laws of motion, to break away into space and escape beyond the influence of the sun's light and heat. But it may not 238 DIVINE SYSTEM OF TIMES AND SEASONS. be ! The great raler of the system asserts his absolute dominion ; no laws of motion can resist the superior law of his attraction ; the earth owns her complete subjection, and is compelled to travel continually in her elliptical orbit around the sun. Yet the struggle is maintained age after age, and age after age the victory rests with the sun. When, at one part of her orbit, the earth's speed is increased to its maximum, she has power for awhile to increase her distance from the central orb round which she so reluctantly circulates. Further and further she retires, as if approaching the inde- pendence and the straight line to which she inclines ; but as she ret«;ats her speed diminishes, and wlien it has reached a minimum, the never relaxed attraction of the central sun is felt with increased power, and she is obliged slowly to approach again the distant but resistless ruler. Distance and velocity may change within certain limits, but the earth's orbit, and the period in which she journeys through it, are invariable, owing to the supreme overmastering dominion of the sun. Other influences exerted on the earth, as that of the moon, and that of her sister planets, are not without their effect ; but they are no more able permanently to change tlie earth's orbit, or alter her period, than are the sticks or stones of the river bank, able to stay the rushing river. Again : steady though the earth's axis seems to be, pointing faithfuUy to the pole star, yet, in obedience to solar and lunar influences, it changes slowly its direction in the course of ages, so that the pole star of to-day, is not the pole star of the creation, nor will it be the pole star of a thousand years hence. This change in the direction of the axis of the earth, causes the entire starry finnament, to seem to revolve around the ecliptic, and makes the sun appear to fall back, through all the signs of the zodiac, in a direction contraiy to that of its annual movement. This revolution, which occupies the immense period of 25,850 years, is called the precession of the equinoxes, or the advance of the equinoctial points. This is a year on a grand scale to our earth, a revolution occupying hundreds of centuries, per- formed under the double influence of solar and lunar attraction, and illus- tating strikingly the complete and perpetual subjection of our globe, to these greater and lesser lights. There is a second motion of the axis called "nutation," (nodding or tilting), caused by the moon's attraction alone. It is owing to a change in the plane of the moon's orbit, which causes the place of its intersection with the ecliptic to vaiy month by month, and year by year, for 19 years, iu which period the series of changes is completed. During half that time, the axis of the earth is slightly tilted in one direction, and during the othei half in the other ; an instance of purely lunar dominion. And on a grander scale than any of these, is the ruling power of the greater light displayed. It is an ascertained fact, that the sun, instead of being fixed and motionless in the heavens, as was at one time supposed, is SOLAR AND LUXAR DOMIXIOX. 239 leading his whole train of attendant planets, with their satellites, on an immense and immeasurable journey through space. At the rate of four or five hundred thousand miles every day, the sun is drawing his magnificent ram after him, our globe included, in a direction which can be distinctly traced, but whose far-sweeping orbit and amazing period, no power of man has been able to calculate. It is therefore evident, that in obedience to the sun's attraction, and in a much smaller degi-ee, to that of the moon, our globe is continually per- lorming movements which are vast, varied, and complex. They range from daily, monthly, and annual effects, to secular chan-cs of enormous though calculable period, and to some whose periods are hi- calculable. Theslownessof some of these movements, the amazing velocity of others the variety of their form, and the vastness of their sweep, fill the mind which contemplates them as affecting the globe on which we dwell, with awe and admiration, and with a profound sense of the reality of solar and unar dominion. The rule of these worlds over our o\vn, is not in word but in power. It is a rule, unlike the most despotic rule with which men are famihar, that makes itself felt at all times, in all places, in spite of all counteracting influences, and it is a mle that nothing can in the long run resist; apt image of the power exercised by Him of whom Gerhardt wrote,- " He eveiTwhere hath sway, And all things serve his might ; His every act pure blessing is. His path unsullied light. ' And not only does the earth itself perform these marvellously complex and mighty motions under soli-lunar influence, but the very same power is the cause of almost all the incessant changes and movements which take place on its surface, and in its constituent elements. Nothing in all its vast e.xtent, as a moment's reflection will show, nosin-lc atom in the material substances which form and clothe the crust of the earth is long at rest. And this unending and infinitely varied movement, may be traced to the influence of the sun and moon. Their rule not only embraces the greatest things, but is felt also by the least. The huge world itself sub- mits to It, and every drop of water, every leaf, every insect, is similarly subject. It is principally by means of its attraction that the sun governs the mo- tions of the globe ; but it is more through its heat, its light and its actinic, magnetic, and electric influences, that it operates on the atmosphere of our earth, on its seas and continents, on its flora and fauna, and on mankind. These forces, acting separately or in combination, produce almost all the changes and movements of matter which we witness, from the hurricane that cools and clear, the heated atmosphere, to the opening of the rose-bud, and the painting of the petal or the leaf. 210 DIVINE SYSTEM OF TIMES AND SEASONS. Its heat is the first great means by which the sun originates terrestrial change and motion. Heat, as is well known, expands and so rarefies all matter. The amount of solar heat received by the earth is enormous. It has been calculated that on one square mile exposed at noon under the equator, 26,00x3 tons of ice would be melted in an hour ; and fifty million times this amount of heat is actually received by the earth from the sun every hour. Were this amount of heat evenly distributed over the earth's surface, it would, in the course of a year, suffice to heat to the boiling point, an ocean of frozen water, sixty miles deep. The amount of heat received by any one part of the earth's surface, de- pends mainly on the altitude in the heavens, attained by the sun in that particular locality. The higher the sun rises, the hotter are its beams, and the longer the period during which its light and heat are enjoyed. When we remember that the three forms in which matter exists, solid, liquid, and gaseous, are due to different degrees of heat, we at once per- ceive the importance of solar heat, in relation to the state of inorganic matter. The results of its presence or absence, are seen at a glance, in the contrast presented by the tropic and frigid zones ; the flowing seas and rivers of the one, and the frozen floods and icc'uergs of the other, arc due solely to the increase or diminution of solar heat. The vast inorganic changes in the surface of the earth which geology reveals, were brought about mainly by the same cause. The slow degra- dation of its solid constituents was due, then as now, to the alternate action of heat and frost, aided by the continual beating of the waves of the ocean, driven by winds, themselves the result of varying degrees of heat. To the flow of rivers and ocean currents, (which spring ultimately from the same cause) was due the dissemination and diffusion of these abraded matters, and their re-arrangement in fresh deposits. The violent volcanic action which from time to time upheaved the aqueous strata, is itself partially traceable to the same cause, for the increase of pressure over large spaces in the beds. of the oceans, occasioned by the immense transfer of matter just alluded to, naturally produced diminished pressure over corresponding portions of the land, and the elastic force of subterranean fires, repressed on the one hand, and released on the other, broke forth in the tremendous upheavals and eruptions of the geologic eras. But it is in the case of the atmosphere surrounding uur globe, that the effect of the sun's heat is most apparent. It is kept in a state of ceaseless and complicated motion by the variations of solar heat. The steady perio- dical trade winds and monsoons, are simply the currents of colder aii which rush in to fill the spaces, in which, by the excessive heat of the rays of a vertical sun, the air has been rarefied to an extreme degree. They are an effect produced by the sun, in his apparent annual progress from one tropic to the other. So the familiar land and sea breezes, which may be recog- nised on every seaboard, though most distinctly in the tropics, arise fron: SOLAR AND LUNAR DOMINION. 241 the unequal heating of the Land and the water. From its low conducting power, the land during tlie hours of sunshine receives and retains more heat than the, water. The superjacent atmosphere becomes more rarefied in con- sequence, and ascends, while the cooler air from the sea, flows in to fill the vacancy. In fact, fickle and uncertain as the winds appear, they are all the result of lazv, and all more or less directly produced by solar ho-.t. In Europe the winds succeed each other in an order always the same, and so marked as to be called " the law of rotation of the winds." Where solar heat is greatest, as in the tropics, atmospheric changes are most violent ; where it is most constant, the general direction of winds is steadiest, as in the trade winds. In short the sun draws al^out the wind, as the loadstone the needle ; and its dominion over the atmosphere is as complete as it is- over the solid globe. Nor is the world of waters any exception to the rule of solar dominion. The whole system of water-circulation, for the cleansing, support and nour- ishment of the world, is worked by solar power ; the sun is the ever-acting pump or heart, by which the supply is raised from the great oceanic reser- voir. Its heat lifts the water in vapours to the sky ; these vapours are transported by the heat-caused winds of which we have spoken, and con- densed by the withdrawal of heat, into rain, snow, hail, or dew, as the case may be. Thus summer heat leads to mists and rains, and when excessive, to tropical deluges ; thus sunset is followed by the fall of dew, and the winter diminution of solar heat, by snow, and hailstorms. The results accomplished by this water supply, are of the highest possible importance in the physical world. The circulation of water, is to the globe, what the circulation of the blood is to the animal frame ; it is the great means by which life is supported, and by which the elements of corruption and decay are removed. In each case the circulation is complete. "All the rivers run into the sea, yet the sea is not full ; unto the place from whence the rivers come, thither they return again." The sparkling springs and mountain rivulets, the murmuring brooks, the flowing rivers, and the broad estuaries, are the continual returning of this life-sustaining water supply, to the ocean from which the sun originally lifted it. This water- circulation, together with all its marvellous effects, in cleansing, nourishing, beautifying, moving, transporting, disintegrating, depositing, accumulating, channelling, changing, etc., is carried on from year to year, and age to age, simply by solar inlluencc. TJic power required for the work, and actually exerted by the sun is enormous. It has been calculated that tlie production of one day's steady rain, over an area equal to that of the county of Middle- sex, demands power, equivalent to the mechanical force which would be requisite to raise 1,000,000,000 tons, to a heiglit of three miles. What then must be the solar force expended in the constant work of watering tiic whole world ? 242 DIVIXE SYSTEM OF TIMES AND SEASONS. Nor is this all ! The ocean reservoir is itself a maze of currents ; no portion of the mighty deep is ever perfectly quiescent. From its surface to its lowest soundings, and from pole to pole, its waters are in ceaseless cir- culation. A large number of its currents have been tabulated, and are laid down on our charts ; some of them are hundreds, and even thousands of miles in length. Their existence is clearly traceable to the effect of solar heat. The heated waters of the Gulf of Mexico, becoming lighter as they expand under the vertical rays of a tropical sun, flow off like oil. from the top of the heavier water which rushes in below to take their place, and guided by the conformation of the adjacent continent, and the direction of the prevaihng winds, cross the Atlantic and form the well known " Gulf stream," whose waters are perceptibly warmer than the ocean througli Vi'hich they run. Similar warm currents are constantly flowing north- ward from the tropics, and cold counter-currents returning from the poles. Thus the cold of extreme northern latitudes is modified, while ice-floes and icebergs are transported southward, and melted in the solar ray ; marine life, both animal and vegetable, is preserved and propagated ; ships are carried to their destinations, and the equilibrium of nature maintained ; and it is the sun which is the source of all this motion in the depths of the sea, as in the heights of the atmosphere. It is mainly to the moon that we are indebted for that marvellous, world- wide, daily-recurring, and most beneficent movement of the waters known as the thics. It is impossible to overrate the value of the ebb and flow of the tide to man. It is a mighty scavenger in the first place, and a most in- expensive and precious mechanical power in the second. By the attractive power of the moon, operating all over the world, the ocean is heaved up at opposite sides of the globe in two broad waves, which travel round the world, steadily following the advancing moon. Two similar but lesser waves follow the track of the sun, and the high bi-monthly wave known as spring tide, is caused by a combination of these two. The nearness of the moon, gives it over the waters of the ocean, a power greater than that of the larger but more distant sun. There is no terrestrial phenomenon which manifests so marked and steady a periodicity as this ebb and flow of the waters of the sea ; and there are few whose general effect is more beneficial. But for it, our shores, where rivers run into the ocean, would become vast stagnant deltas of corruption ; sources of pestilence and death. Cities and towns naturally grow up on the banks of rivers, and have an inevitable tendency to pollute them. But twice a day, thanks to the tidal wave, their impurities, instead of being suf- fered to accumulate in their channels, or at their mouths, are carried out to sea, and lost or rendered harmless ; a most important advantage to mankind. A transport service of enormous extent is also performed by the tide, on coasts and on rivers, and where wind and steam arc not available. SOLAR AND LUNAR DOMLYION. 243 The heavier traffic carried on by large ships and in barges, is often taken in tow by this quiet but powerful tug, which performs without expense, an amount of mechanical labour, the money value of which would be difficult to calculate, even for one large city. Tiie close connection between tidal phenomena and lunar movements, is demonstrated by the fact that the tides have their cycles, which have been reduced to tables, and lound accurately to coincide with cycles of soli-lunar change. For many years tide-tables were constructed from the results of observation independently of science. But Mr. Lubbock, a mathematician, convinced that more accurate tables might be framed on a scientific basis, undertook the extensive labours needful for their preparation. Finding that regular tide observations had been made at the London Docks, from 1795) he took nineteen years of these, purposely selecting the length of a cycle of the motions of the lunar orbit ; constructed tables for the effect on the tide of the moon's declination, parallax, and hour of transit ; and was able to produce tide-tables founded on the data thus obtained, which -wefe more exact than those which were compiled from observation alone. The sun exerts mighty and mysterious influences over the earth, inde- pendently of his attraction and of his heat. That there is a close connection between solar and lunar force, and ma^^tietisni, has been abundantly demon- strated, though the nature of that connection is still, to a great extent, a problem awaiting solution. Distinct diurnal, montiily, and annual variations in the direction of tlic magnetic needle, have been discovered, indicating the existence of some hidden, but close, relation between the revolutions of the sun and moon, and this potent and all-pervading force. Universal magnetic variations, accurately and constantly correspond with the changes which take place in the position of the sun and moon witli reference to the earth. " All the magnetic elements, are subject to periodical variations, dependent on the position of the sun with respect to the meridian, the period of which is ac- cordingly, the solar day." "They are subject also to a small variation dependent on the position of the moon with respect to the meridian ; " * and to a third irregularity which is annual in character, attaining its maxima and minima in the spring and autumn in the nortliern hemisphere, and vict versa in the southern. Besides this, the magnetic declination changes slowly at all parts of the earth, in the course of centuries. Thus in the year 15S0, and onwards to the year 1657, the declination of the magnetic needle at London was in an easterly direction, but constantly decreasing. At the latter date it disap- peared altogether, and for some years the magnetic meridian coincided witli the astronomic. After the year 1660 tlie declination became westerly ; it * "Treatise on Magnetism." IL Lloyd, D.D. , I'rovost of Trinity Col- lege, Dublin. 241 DIVINE SYSTEM OF TIMES AND SEASONS. attained its maximum in this direction in tlie year 1S15, and has ever since been diminishing, and returning towards the true astronomic meridian as before. In addition to these diurnal, monthly, annual, and secular variations in the direction of the magnetic needle, there is an eleven years' cycle of electric and magnetic change, corresponding constantly and accurately, both in its duration, and in its periods of maxima and minima, with the eleven years' cycle of solar change, or that of the increase and diminution of sini spots, whose very remarkable periodicity was discovered by Schwabe of Dessau. The periods of scarcity and abundance of the spots on the sun, succeed each other every five and a half years, so that in eleven years, the sun passes through all its stages of purity and spottiness: that is, about nine times in the course of every century. Both the beautiful electric phenomena called the aurora borealis, and the magnetic currents which influence the compass, are closely connected with these spots on the sun, though in what manner cannot be explained. Magnetic storms, as they are called, or sudden and powerful currents which cause the needle to jump and jerk violently at the same moment, all over the earth, and singularly brilliant and widespread aurora, have been observed to correspond with remarkable outbursts of light, in or near some of the solar spots. The years 1857 to 1S61 were re- markable for spots : in September, 1859, a most singular appearance was noted by two separate observers, unknown to each other, and in different parts of the world. Great spots were on that day visible on the disc of the sun, and suddenly a brilliant luminous appearance, like a cloud of light more dazzling than the sun itself, appeared close to one of the spots ; in about live minutes it swept across and beside it, travelling over a space which could not be less than 35,000 miles in tliat brief space of time. What was this? An explosion of gas? A conflagration? It is impossible to say ; but observations made at the time prove, that the earth was in a per- fect convulsion of electro-magnetism at the moment. The self-registering magnetic instruments at Kew, which are always at work, recording photo- graphically every instant, the positions of three differently arranged mag- netic needles, showed, when examined subsequently, that each of the three liUxie at that moment a strongly mai-kcd jerk from its former position, Aurorre were seen at the same time, even in parts of the world where they are rarely visible ; as near the equator, and in South Australia. In some places the electric telegraph refused to work, and at several towns in America the telegraph men received severe electric shocks. At Boston, a flame of fire followed the pen of Bain's electric telegraph, which writes dowTi the message on chemically prepared paper. There can be no question whatever that the solar phenomena, whatever its nature, had a direct and instantaneous terrestrial ej/ect, and tiie fact is a new proof of solar dominion in the inorganic world. ■ CHAPTER II. Soli-lunar Dominion in the Organic World, effects of light and heat on the development and distribution of PLANTS AND ANIMALS AND OF THE HU- MAN RACE. DIURNAL AND SEASONAL CHANGES IN RELA- TION TO HEALTH AND DISEASE. WE have traced the supreme and all-pervading influence which the " two great lights " appointed to rule the day and night exert, in the production of inorganic terrestrial change. It remains to observe their effect on organized exis- , tences, on plants and animals, and on man himself. In this wide and interesting realm, as in the previous one, we shall find that solar influence is supreme. Light and heat are the most powerful of all agents in the quickening and support of animal and vegetable life, and of these the sun is of course the great source and centre. By its presence or absence, are caused our day and night ; and by its elevation or depression, our seasons. These, in their varied alternations, set in motion and control the entire world of organized existence. What simplicity and sublimity in these solar revolutions and their results ! The dawning of day is the signal for the world's awaking from that deathlike sleep which is the child of dark- ness ; with the rising of the sun the flowers open, the birds burst forth into song, and eveiywhere is seen the stirring of life and activity. The duration of the day sustains and nour- ishes the infinitely numerous and complicated organic move- ments and revolutions it has awakened, and its termination reproduces universal silence and repose. Were the days considerably to lengthen or shorten, were the seasons to change or cease, how immense and disastrous would 246 DIVINE SYSTEM OF T/JfES AND SEASONS. l)e the results to all organized existences ! The permanence of seed-time and harvest, day and night, cold and heat, has been promised by the sure word of a gracious and bountiful Creator, and the accomplishment of that promise is eftected by the per- manence and stability of the earth's actual relations with the sun. These may slightly vary in the course of the prolonged secular changes, discovered by astronomic observation, but compensating powers exist which keep these changes within very narrow limits, and provide for the maintenance of equi- librium, thus securing that uniformity of solar influence, which is needful for the continuation of terrestrial life. The inclination of the axis of the earth, to the plane of her orbit, for instance, is at present undergoing a steady, though very slow diminution. Were this to continue, unchecked, or to accelerate, a time must come sooner or later, when the equator and the ecliptic would coincide, and thus destroy the present succession of the seasons. But this catastrophe will never happen ; the all-wise Creator has provided for a continuance of the works of his hands. Before the movement of the earth's axis in this direction can produce any perceptible results, in changing the climate of any part of the globe, it will cease. The axis will, under fresh influences, remain steady for a time, and then commence a retrograde movement, which will restore it to its original posi- tion. It will thus oscillate to and fro in the ages to come, without ever deranging to the slightest extent, the climate of the various parts of the earth. The extent of solar influence in the organic world, is mar- vellous to contemplate. The sun is the glowing ever acting heart of organic nature ; the succession of day and night are the pulsation, the systole and diastole, the contraction and expansion of that heart. The sun is the all-imi)ortant reser- voir of life-supporting power, constantly sending its royal tide of vitalizing light and heat, through all the arteries of the mundane system, to its uttermost extremities, penetrating its utmost recesses and lowest depths, with its life-giving warmth. SOLAR AND LUNAR DOMJNION. 247 Vegetable life, without exception, is generated under the sun's quickening influence ; without it, not a seed would germinate, not a blade would spring, not a leaf would shoot, not a bud would burst, not a petal would unfold, not a flower would bloom, not a fruit would ripen. It alone raises and distils the dews and rains which feed and nourish the entire world of plants ; it alone dyes the field and the forest with their verdure ; it alone paints the blossom with its beauty, and tints with hues of loveliness both earth and heaven. It gives birth to the breezes, which stir the movements of every leaf and branch, scatter seeds and perfumes, and strip away all that has withered or yielded to decay. It is the joyful parent of spring, and the fruitful fount of summer wealth and autumnal glory. Animals are equally indebted to the sun. Without it none of the innumerable forms of animal life could for a moment exist. Without its warmth all muscular power would be paralysed, the frozen blood would fail to circulate, respiration would cease, and life would inevitably become extinct. Its rising and its setting, its shining and withdrawing, its ascent in summer, its decline in autumn and winter, and return in spring, control the cycles and create the boundaries of all the phases of animated nature, the sleeping and the waking, the stillness and the activity, the silence and the song, the action, the passion, and the repose of innumerable tribes of living creatures, peopling air and earth and seas. Man walks in its light, labours in its heat, basks in its smile, rejoices in its glory. It is the constant and irresistible ruler of days, and years, and seasons, and is enthroned as such, from generation to generation, and from age to age. In all these respects, it is the most glorious and sublime of all the material emblems of Him, from whose creative fiat, it of old derived existence and dominion, and by whose unfailing power it is up- held ; of Him who is the blessed and only Potentate, the King of kings and Lord of lords, the eternal and overflowing Source of light and love. As the moon only reflects the sun's li^/U in a very modified 248 DIVINE SYSTEM OF TIMES AND SEASONS. degree, and no perceptible portion of its /icat, it exercises little direct influence on or^^ajiized nature. Its indirect action upon the organized forms contained in, or affected by, the many seas, estuaries, and tidal rivers of the world, is very considerable. The existence of the immense variety of plants and animals which live on the shores or boundaries of sea and land, is to a large extent conditioned by the ebb and flow of tides. To man, the moon is a useful and beautiful night lamp, and an invaluable chronometer, while by its daily, world wide, tidal movement, it is as we have seen, next to the sun, his most powerful natural aid. It rules for him the night, and regulates his calendar, indicating by its movements, in conjunction with the sun, the measures of time which he universally adopts and follows. A few familiar facts, illustrative of the above statements, may serve to give them the weight they deserve, and if any apology be needful for re- calling natural phenomena, with the existence of which many if not most are familiar, it must be found in the necessity which we are under, of firmly establishing the great truth of soli-lunar dominion over terrestrial move- ment and change, in order to the due appreciation of the subsequent portion of this treatise. Be it then remembered that the sun not only produces day and night, and the succession of seasons in each particular locality, regulating by this means, the growth and actiNity of organized nature, but by its various degrees of elevation in different latitudes, it causes all the varieties ol climates, and through these, the development and distribution of vegetable and animal life throughout the world. These various degrees of elevation, causing the sun to afford varying degrees of light and heat, produce the different zones into which our globe, as regards climate, is divided. The principal zones are the equatorial zone, the tropical zones, the subtropical, the warmer temperate, the colder temperate, the sub-arctic, the arctic, and the polar zones. Now life, whatever may be its origin, clearly depends for its continuance, on the physical conditions by which it is surrounded. According to the degrees of moisture or drought, heat or cold, the plant or animal flourishes, or languishes and dies. It is only in the case of certain plants and animals, that "acclimatization" under non-natural circumstances is possible, and even with these, it is possible only within certain limits, and by the greatest care. The flora peculiar to a region of excessive drought, will not survive removal to a region of excessive humidity, nor will ferns and marsh plants SOLAR AND LUNAR DOMINION. 249 thrive in the desert. It is obvious, therefore, that on a globe where the sun produces such diversity of climate, life must exist under widely diversi- fied forms. No region, save the extreme polar perhaps, is utterly destitute, of it, but each has its own peculiar development. The intertropical regions of the earth, having in greatest perfection the conditions favourable to life, or in other words having a large share of solar heat and light, have an exuberant g«)wth of vegetable life and a redundance of animal existence. This decreases in each zone as we proceed towards the poles, till we reach the boundary, where a minimum of solar light and heat forbid the exis tence ot any form of life. Since temperature similarly decreases, as we ascend from the level of the sea into the higher regions of the atmosphere, vegetation varies, not only according to latitude, but according to altitude. The Alpine traveller may pass througli the climates of the various zones in one day. He leaves the rich vineyards, and the flowering myrtle and pomegranate, the fruit-bearing orange and lemon-trees behind him, in the valley ; passes through woods of oaks, sweet- chestnuts and beeches, as he mounts the lower slopes ; and amid pines and birches, as he gains the higher parts of the mountain, till at last he finds only the short fine occasional pasture grass, and subsequently nothing but lichens and mosses, edging the beds of perpetual snow and ice The vine disappears before he has climbed two thousand feet ; the chest- nuts have vanished at three ; the oak fails to put in an appearance at lour, and the birch long before he has climbed five thousand feet. The spruce- fir greets him as high as 5,900 feet, but even it goes no further. For nearly two thousand feet above this last of the trees, the beautiful rhododendron and other shrubs, cover immense tracts of the mountain side ; the her- baceous willow, the saxifrages, the hardy dark -blue gentian and the grasses creep up to eight thousand feet, but only lichens and mosses go right up to meet the never melting snow which caps the mountain top. It is the same in the world of waters.. Marine plants are equally dis- tributed in zones, and have also a vertical arrangement. Depth regulates heat and light for aquatic vegetation, and each successively deepening zone has its own peculiar forms of life. The ocean is divided into littoral, circumlittoral, median, infra-median, and abyssal or deep-sea zones; in this last only the microscopic "diatoms" exist, at a depth of over six hundred feet. The ordinary alg.-e scarcely descend half that depth. Animals have less precise geographical limits than plants, their powers of locomotion and self-dispersion modifying the influences which climate and external conditions have upon them. Lut there is a well marked horizontal and vertical arrangement of animals, from the equator to the poles, and from the sea level to the loftiest heights of land, and to the greatest depths of ocean. Thus the larger carnivora are pretty much 250 DIVINE SYSTEM OF TIMES AND SEASONS. confined to the tropics, as also the elephant, rhinoceios, and hippopotamus, the crocodile, boa, and larger reptiles, the ostrich, flamingo, parrots, hum- ming birds, and the generality of birds of very brilliant plumage, together with a most varied and exuberant insect life, which for variety, size, activity, and brilliancy, attains its maximum in Brazil and the East Indies, decreas- ing towards the temperate zone. The useful domestic animals — the horse, the ox, the sheep, the dog, are specially characteristic of the temperate zones, while the arctic regions have the polar bear and the reindeer, the musk ox, the wolf, the fox, and the sable : few species, but many individuals, and all sober and quiet in hue, and clad in warm furs. Reptile life does not exist in the arctic zone. It is the same as regards the sea-animals, their range is by no means universal. In the torrid zone are found a vast variety of genera and of species, and in colder latitudes, fewer species, but enormous numbers of individuals. So the fishes and shell-fish of the sunny tropic are of beautiful tints and hues, while the seals and whales of the arctic regions, are sombre and uniform in colour. The seal and the walrus never visit the torrid zone, nor are sharks ever seen in polar seas. The great majority of the food fishes are only found in perfection in the cool waters of high latitudes ; and though the sea water contains everywhere the same constituents, the coral insect builds his reefs only in the subtropical expanses of the ocean. AVlien we pass on to notice the effect of solar dominion on human develop- ment, and on the distribution of men on the earth, we at once perceive that it must necessarily be of a far more indirect character, than that exercised over plants and animals, and more difficult to trace. Man has not only power of locomotion, but he is imbued with curiosity, ambition, and many other motives, which impel him to wander, and there- fore, though it is now confessed by all naturalists, that scientifically speaking, all the various races of mankind constitute a single species of a single genus, yet we find this species, domesticated under every variety of climate, and able to subsist almost equally well between the tropics and in the polar regions. At first sight this would seem to indicate, that as far as the development of the race is concerned, mankind is independent of climatic differences. But this is far from being the case, as a little consideration will show. Of the five great families into which the human race is divided, the Caucasian, Mongolian, Ethiopian, Malay, and American, the distinguishing charac- teristics have a marked relation to the climate, and consequent productions and physical peculiarities, of the lands inhabited by each. Man, it is trae, can struggle against, or modify the physical conditions which surround him, but he is never independent of them. There can be no doubt that our own moderate climate, is more conducive to mental and bodily vigour, than is the relaxing heat of the great plains of Ilindostan ; nor that the slight differences of the seasons to which we have to adapt all our habits and SOLAR AND LUNAR DOMhXION. 251 pursuits, have a stimulating eftect on energy and activity, laclcing to nations ■who are subjected to excessively hot summers and cold winters. But for our insular situation, . Englishmen would probably never have been the traders and adventurers they are, and but for our natural supplies of coal and iron, we should never have acquired the mechanical and manufacturing character we now possess. Climate, food, and landscape, influence mental as well as bodily character. We speak of "depressing weather," of an " enervating " or of a " bracing" climate ; of " inspiring " scenery, and so on, and the idea conveyed by these expressions, that the outer world affects the inner man, is true. The White or Caucasian variety of the human family, is the one which exhibits in their highest degree, all the intellectual and moral powers of human nature. It belongs to the temperate zone in either hemisphere. " Man presents to our view his most perfect type at the very centre of the temperate continent, at the centre of Asia-Europe, in the regions of Iran, Armenia, and the Caucasus, and departing from this geographical centre, in the three grand directions of the lands, the types gradually lose the beauty of their forms, in proportion to their distance, even to the extreme points of the southern continents, where we find the most deformed and degenerate races, and the lowest in the scale of humanity." "The indigenous man of America," says M. Guyot, "bears in his whole character, the ineffaceable stamp of the peculiarly vegetative character of his country. Living con- tinually in the shadow of those virgin forests, which overspread the country he inhabits, his whole nature has been modified thereby. The very copper hue of his complexion, indicates that he lives not like the Negro, beneath the scorching sunbeams. His lymphatic temperament betrays the pre- l^onderance in his nature of the vegetable element. . . . The Indian has continued the man of the forest ; he has seldom elevated himself above the condition of the hunter, the lowest grade in the scale of civilization ; he has never ascended to the rank of the pastoral man. With him no domestic animals are maintained to feed him with their milk, or clothe him with their fleeces, as they are by the nomadic races of the Old World. From one to the other extremity of America we find the same lamentable spectacle. The people of the elevated table-lands of Mexico and Peru arc the only exceptions to this picture, and this exception goes far to establish the in- fluence of the vegetative and Inunid lo"i~y weeks." — Dr. Laycock. From some "statistical details respecting the menstrual periods," given in Schweig's researches, we learn that " the results of 200 menstruations in 263 DIVINE SYSTEM OF TIMES AND SEASONS. tiplicity of accidents. But parturition will be accomplished, or the parturient disposition will take place, before or at the expir- ation of forty weeks from the time of conception. Nor does it seem reasonable that a law of nature, which is not altered by the differences of age, by the diet, by the extremes of climates, by the severities of slavery, or the indulgences of luxury, should be changed by circumstances of less importance." * Thus throughout all ages, and in all countries, the initial stage of human existence, the intra-uterine life of every one born into the wide world, is measured by weeks ; and not till forty weeks have run their course, does the human being at- tain independent existence. These are phenomena of uni- versal occurrence, and of fundamental importance in the natural history of mankind ; they are leading and unques- tionable physiological facts. The periodicity of life, and the periodicity of birth^ need no demonstration, for the expe- rience of every individual bears witness to it, as well as to the fact that it is regulated by a law of weeks. And if this thirty-four individuals, showed an avcrnge of 27-S d.iys, the 7naxiinum imvibcr in the tabic bein:; 28 days." {Medical Rct'ic-iO, Jtdy, 1 844.) Even exceptional cases to tlie ordinary monthly period, are regulated by a 'weekly variation. "I sought the explanation of such cases, and found that, in one half of the three-iueekly cases, the type was explained by ovario- uterine disease of an organic nature, or by chlorosis ; and in more than one half of the 5?x-7cvr/7T cases, the patient's health was habitually bad, owing in two instances to uterine disease, which was also the case with the one that assumed the /w/A';';V///y type." — (Tilt, "On Uterine Inflammation.") There is an analogous montldy gain and loss of siibstance and weight in the case of men, which was first discovered by Sanctorius. " Nature, animate or inanimate, is full of periodically recurring phenomena. The periodicity of our j^lanetary system is felt by man, for he experiences, by insensible perspiration, a constant fcriodical loss, which was first discovered by Sanctorius, who established — that even those who are in a perfect state of health, and observe the utmost moderation in living, once a month increase beyond their us2ial7ucight to the quantity of oite 07- t%uo pounds, and at the 7nontKs end rctnrn again to their usual standard, and that this is accompanied by an important change in the secretions. A further analogy between menstruation and the monthly oscillation in the urinary discharge referred to, as observed by Sanctorius, is that, ' before the afore- said crisis happens, there is felt a heaviness in the head, and a lassitude all over the body, which symptoms are afterv.-arcls removed.' " — (Tilt, p. 204.) ' Denniaii, vol. i. p. 306. THE LAW OF COMPLETION IN WEEKS. 263 be the case in health, and ^vith normal functions, so is it also with disease, and in abnormal derangements. From time immemorial, it has been observed tliat fevers, and intermit- tent attacks of ague, gout, and similar complaints, have a septiform periodicity ; that the seventh, fourteenth, and twenty-first, are critical days. In his investigation into the phenomena of fevers. Dr. Lay- cock states that, '• Whatever type iJie fever may cxliibif, there will be a par- oxysm on the seventh day, and consequently this day should be distinguished by an unusual fatality or number of crises. For analogous reasons the fourteenth tuill be remarkable as a day of amendment, the last paroxysm of a quotidian taking place on that day, and the last of a tertian on the day previous; for observation has established that if a tertian is to cease about the fourth paroxysm (the seventh critical day), the second paroxysm will be more severe than the first or third ; but if the fourth be severe, and the fifth less so, the disease will end at the seventh paroxysm, and, of course, the change for the better, if this rule be apphed to remittent or continued fevers, will be seen on tlie fourteenth day. Should, however, the exacerbation occurring on the thirteenth day end fatally, whether it be the seventh of a tertian or the fifth of a quartan, death will probably take place early on the fourteenlli day, namely, about three or four o'clock, a.m., when the system is most languid." That these theoretical inferences are borne out by facts, all medical writers agree, and indeed it may be ])roved numerically by tables of cases, compiled v.ithout the least reference to critical days.* * Forcstius relates forty-ci;;lit cases of acute fever, without any reference to critical clays; five of these terminated on the fourth day, iwcnty-Uwontkc scvcntli, two on the eleventli, and seven on the Jouylantlt. The cases detailed by StoU in his ' Ratio },Iedendi,' exhibit the same ^j;eneral fact ; the seventh aiul fouitcenth days, and then tlie fourlli and eleventh, arc the most re- markable. 264 DIVINE SYSTEM OF TIMES AND SEASONS. Nor is it in fevers alone that this law of septiform periodicity is traceable. Paroxysms of gout afford another illustration of its operation. "A fit of the gout going regularly through its stages in a robust subject, observes tJie foUoiuiiig order : — " The patient retires to rest well, or perhaps in better spirits than usual, and is awoke at two o'clock in the morning by rigors, thirst, and other febrile symptoms, and with pain in the great toe, or heel, or other part. This pain and the febrile action go on mzxQ2i.%\x\'g for exactly ttve7iiy-foiir hours, that is to say, until two o'clock, a.m., comes again, when a remission takes place, sometimes an intermission ; the intcn'al it occupies being another nyctemeron, or period of twentyfonr hoiirs, at the end of which another febrile paroxysm comes on. And so paroxysm and remission or intermission alternate, until the fit terminates. A fit of the gout, under the circumstances stated, is a tertian intermittent (in the measure of its intervals), and, like a tertian, it terminates in fourteen days, or after seveii paroxysms. " If the patient go on luxuriating in his diet, the next fit, if left to flannel and patience, will be of a double lefigth, or occupy iwefity-eight days, and have fourteen febrile pai'oxysms, or ex- acerbations ; or it will be tripled, and be of six weeks' duration, and so go on increasing iti length by a defitiite r-atio of weeks, as the predisposing and exciting causes become more efficient, until the viscera and the general system become so deranged that no regular fit takes place." It is important also to notice, that not only is the week an evident measure in such fevers, and intermittents, but the half week also. His investigations of the subject of vital perio- dicity forced this fact on the notice of Dr. Laycock, and its agreement with the periods of prophecy, leads us to call attention to his statement. " The complete day of twenty-four hours is the pathological period most generally noticed by physicians; but, as I have Sec Lamct, 1S42-3, vol. i., p. 12S. THE LAW OF COMPLETION EN WEEKS. 26; shown, there are also periods of three days and a half, or seven ha If -days. This is, in fact, the ancient division of the whole day, or vvy6rni.(.pov, into tiuo farts. We must start with this half-day, or day of twelve horns, as the miit which will comprise the phe- nomena of the best-marked class of periodic disease, the inter- mittents. Dr, Graves is, I believe, the only physician who has made this observation, and applied it to pathology. He observed that, if this period were adopted, * we should not count three days and a half, Imt seven half-days : we would not say seven days, but fourteen half-days.' Reckoning thus, many of the anomalous critical effects, and critical terminations in con- tinued fevers, would, I have no doubt, be found strictly con- formable to some regular law of periodicity." * The operation of the law we are considering may be traced also in the growth of children and young people from infancy to maturity, in the duration of the human powers, in their fullest perfection, and in their gradual decay. Dr. Laycock divides life into three great periods, the first and last, each stretching over 21 years, and the central period or prime of life lasting 28 years. Thtfrst, which extends from conception to full maturity at 21 years of age, he subdivides into seven distinct stages, marked by well defined physical characteristics, as follows : — " I. Intra-uterine life ; " 2. The period between birth and the first dentition ; " 3. The time occupied by the first dentition ; " 4. The period between the first and second dentition ; " 5. The time of the second dentition ; " 6. The ])eriod between the latlcr and commencing puberty ; " 7. The time occupied in the evolution of the reproductive system. " The second great period will comprise three minor periods : — * Lancet, 1S42-3, vol. i., p. 423. 266 DIVINE SYSTEM OF TIMES AND SEASONS. " I. The perfecting of adolescence, from 21 to 28 ; " 2. The chmax of development, or status of life, from 28 to 42 ; and "3. The septenary of decline in die reproductive powers, extending from 42 to 49 (after which latter age conception rarely takes place). " The f/iird great period comprises also three minor subdivi- sions : — " I. The grand climacteric, from 49 to 6^ ; " 2. Old age, from 63 to 70 ; "3. The years of cetas ingravescence, or decrepitude, from 70 to death. "In fixing these epochs," says Dr. Laycock, "I have fol- lowed the generally received septennial division, being reluctant to make any innovation thereon. It would I think, however, be more in accordance with modern science, /a date, not from birth, btit from the conceptio7i of the individual. If this be done, each great period, should be calculated as commencing forty weeks earlier." The process of dentition affords also illustrations of the operation of the law of septiform periodicity in vital pheno- mena ; * and viability, or the probability of life, is highest at 14 * " The order of the development oftlie teeth in man is an interesting subject, as upon it we must i)rincipally rely for dcterminin;^ the periods ol' development in the system t^enerally. Mr. Goodsir's researches are ex- ceedingly interesting, as marking this gradual hebdomadal evolution in the embryo and fojtus, but arc not sufficiently accurate for our jnirpose as to the tune when the changes occur. Previous to the cniptivc stage, or com- mon dentition, there are three phases of development ; \\\ii papillary, com- mencing about the sa'cnih week of fa.'tal life, iha pollicular in the tenth, and the saceular in the fourteenth 'wech, which continue until the cniptive stage, about the seventh month after Inrlh, when the four central incisors present themselves. After this the other teeth ajipear at intervals not yet i:>rccisely fixed, the first dentition being terminated, however, by the end of the thirty-sixth month. All is then quiescent for three or four years, or until the middle or end of ti:c sroentli year, when the nr.-,t true molar makes its appearance, which according to Air. Goodsir, is analogous to the milk teeth in its mode of formatior,, the permanent central incisors appearing about the same time." — Liincd, 1843-4, vol. iii., p. 255. THE LAW OF COMPLETION IN WEEKS. 267 years of age. Dr. Laycock puts the results of his careful re- searches, into the five following propositions : — " I. That there is a general law of periodicity which regulates all the vital movements in all animals. " 2. That the periods within which these movements take place admit of calculations approximately exact. " 3. That the fundamental unit,- — the unit upon which these calculations should be based, — must for the present be con- sidered as one day of twelve hours. " 4. That the lesser periods are simple and compound multi- ples of this unit, in a numerical ratio analogous to that observed in chemical compounds. " 5. That the fundamental unit of the greater periods is one iveck of seven days, each day being twelve hours ; and that single and compound multiples of this unit, determine the length of these periods by the same ratio, as multiples of the unit of twelve hours determine the lesser periods. T/iis la::> binds all periodic vital piienoniena together, and links the periods obse?ved in the loiuest ann?ilose animals, 7oith tJiose of man himself, the highest of tJie vei'tebrata. . . ." He concludes his investigation vv-ith the following words : — " The sure and steady course of j^roleptical science will be from particulars to generals, and if its foundation be firmly established on severe induction, we may hope at some future day to extend its principles to the cycles of the seasons, and to comprise within its sphere, not only individual men and women, but societies generally, and even the whole human race. The axiom that the whole is equal to the sum of all its parts, is universally true, whatever the whole may be ; and there is really no reason for despairing that we shall attain to a knowledge of the whole alluded to, (a knowledge which must necessarily be derived from a knowledge of its jiarts.) because those parts are microscopically small to the intellect. The boundaries of astronomical science have been pushed from small and obscure beginnings, into the infinite in space, time, and number ; and who can tell but that Providence may so assisi 26S DIVINE SYSTEM OF TIMES AND SEASONS. the humble inquirer into nature, that science shall be extended to the infinite in littleness, and so man be able to look down, by the light of philosophy, upon the varied phenomena of ter- restrial life, — their multifarious combinations and complexities, their cycles and epicycles, — as he looks into the planetary world ; and see nothing but order and simplicity where now there appears inextricable confusion." * " There is a harmony oj numbers in all iiature ; in the force of gravity, in the planetary movements, in the laws of heat, light, electricity, and chemical affinity, in the forms of animals and plants, in the perceptions of the mind. The direction indeed of modern natural and physical science, is towards a general- isation which shall express the fundamental laws of all, by one simple numerical ratio. We would refer to Professor Whewell's * Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences,' and to Mr. Hay's re- searches into the laws of harmonious colouring and form. Fro7n these it appears that the number seven is distinguished in the laws regulating the harmonious petreption of forms, colours, and sounds, and probably of taste also, if we could analyse our sensations of this kind with mathematical accuracy."t There are probably few branches of natural science from which additional facts in confirmation might not be culled. But the above may suffice, for our object is less to trace the extent of the dominion of this law, than to prove its existence in nature. The realm of entomology recognises this law, ichthyology and ornithology do the same, and the mammalia equally bear witness to its jjrevalence. As to man, his birth, growth, dentition, development, maturity, vital functions, re- productive system, health, disease, life and death, all his times and all his seasons, are more or less distinctly con- trolled by the law of completion in weeks. His very pulse keeps time to the seven day period. Dr. Stratton states (as the result of several series of observations) that in health, the human pulse is more frequent in the morning than in the Lancet, 1S42-3. t J/u/. Rcvu"v,]\\\y, 1S44. THE LAW OF COMPLETION IN WEEKS. 269 evening, for six days out of seven ; and that on the seventh day it is slower. * And man's life as a whole is a week, a week of decades. "The days of our years are threescore years and ten" and that by Divine appointment. Combining the testimony of all these facts, we are bound to admit that there prevails in organic nature a laio of septifoinn periodicity, a law of completiomn weeks. We turn now to consider, the prevalence of the same law "in Scripture. • Edinlniv^h Hied, and Surgical yoiiniaI,]:m., 1S43. CHAPTER II. TiiE Week in Scripture. there is a chronological system ix scripture. — it is a svste:\i of weeks. — this system is traceadle through- out THE L.\W, THE PROPHETS, AND THE GOSPEL. — THE WEEK IN TIIE MOSAIC RITUAL. — THE WEEK IN JEWISH HISTORY. — TIIE WEEK IN PROPHECY. — TIIE WEEK OF DAYS — OF WEEKS — OF MONTHS— OF YEARS — OF WEEKS OF YEARS — OF YEARS OF YEARS — OF MILLENARIES. FROM the foregoing facts it is abundantly evident that the hand of the Creator has regulated a vast variety of world-wide vital phenomena, by a Imo oj weeks : that a scpli- form periodicity has been, by God Himself, impressed upon nature. The Holy Scriptures claim to be a revelation from the God of nature, and an orderly and consistent system of chronology is one marked feature of the sacred volume. JVbia it is a inost notciuorthy and indisputable fact, that this system is, from first to last, a system of weeks : septijorin periodieity is stamped jfpon the Bible, as conspieuously and even more so, than on nature. The whole of its chronology — beginning with the order of creation unfolded in its earliest chapters, including the entire order of Providence revealed in its succeeding portion, and the typical and actual chronology of redemption itself^is regulated by the law of weeks. The times prior to the existence of man ; the times recorded by the histories of the Pentateuch ; the times enacted by the Mosaic ritual ; the times traceable in Jewish history; and the times unfolded by the prophets, — all arc without exception characterized by this feature. The actual length of the days of creation, whether longer or shorter, docs not affect this statement, for the septiformity of creation THE LAV/ OF COMPLETION /.V WEEKS. 271 chronology is equally clear, whatever may have been the mea- sures of the creation week ; and the Bible system includes, as we shall see, weeks on a great variety of scales. The Le\dtical law contained a ceremonial system which shadowed forth good things to come, and the chronology of.its obser\^ances, which was one of its most marked features, was as t)-pical as all the rest — tj.'pical of the chronology of redemption histor)'. The Levitical chronology was a system of weeks on various scales of magnitude ; one which employed the main natural di\asions of time, the day, month, and year, as units for its weeks, and which also employed the largest of these weeks, as a imit for still larger septiform periods. And as the complete chronology of the typical law foreshadowed the vronderful history of redemption, so the chronology of Old and New Testament prophecy, has reference to the same ; for prophecy is only history anticipated, as types are history foreshown in action. But the views of history given in divinely inspired prophecy, are wider, and more compre- hensive than can be found elsewhere, and therefore in pro- phetic chronology, we find periods of vaster scope — plainly foretold, or obscurely intimated — and above all a key to the whole plan of history. In this grand prophetic chronology, we trace the same system ; it is throughout septiform, it con- sists of a series of weeks. Here, the legal week of seven years, the week v/hose unit is a solar year, is multiplied tenfold (70 years) and seventy-fold (490 years) ; and here on the same principle, only on a h^her scale, as the year had been previously employed as the imit of a week, so it is now employed as the unit of a year ; this is the year-day system of chronological symbolic prophecy. Weeks of such years are appointed as the measures of vast periods of histor/, distinguished one from the other by moral features, and by varied degrees of Divine revelation, such as the Patriarchal, Jewish, and Christian dispensations. In all these ditierent departments of Scripture, we shall find a uniform consistent chronological pla^ — ///(?kw-^' reigns supreme; 272 DIVLXE SYSTEM OF TIMES AND SEASONS. it measures alike the briefest and the longest periods, and can be traced in various forms, in the law, in tlie prophets, and in the gospel. It runs like a golden thread through the entire texture of the Bible ; and this fact alone, were there no other evidence on the point, proves a unity of design, pervading this collection of the writings of about forty different authors of various lands and ages, which argues it the product of one in- spiring mind, — the mind of the great Creator. On the world his hands have fashioned, and on the Word his Spirit has inspired. He has stamped in equally indelible characters, i/ie week, as the divinely selected measure of human time. In connection with the first appearance of the week — on the opening page of Scripture in the narrative of the creation, — we find an exposition of its profound meaning, the moral object and end of God in its selection. It is the period that leads up to, and terminates in, the rest of God. We read, " On the seventh day God ended his work which He had made, and He rested on the seventh day from all his work which He had made. And God blessed the seventh day and sanctified it, because that in it He had rested from all his work, which God created and made." The same reason is assigned for the enjoined observance of the Sabbath, in the law given at Sinai : " Six days shalt thou labour and do all thy work ; but the seventh day is the sabbath of the Lord thy God, in it thou shalt not do any work. ... for in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea and all that in them is, and restAi the seventh day, wherefore the Lord blessed the seventh day and hallowed it." The rest of God, and of man his creature, with God, in the enjoyment of the results of the work of God, — results which God Himself sees to be very good, — this is the end attained, at the close of the week ; this is the sabbath. This was the creation sabbath, soon, alas ! marred by sin ; this shall be the redemption sabbath, when the second great work of God, the new creation in Christ Jesus, is complete. P\o sooner had sin destroyed the sabbath rest of creation, than the great THE LAW OF COMPLETION IN WEEKS. 273 Creator, in his invincible goodness, began to work again. " My Father worketh hitherto, and I work," said Christ ; and such is still the case, for redemption is not yet complete, and the rest of God, and of man with God, is still future. The Hebrew word translated "week" means seven, and would designate any period composed of ^^z^^;^ shorter petiods, whether days, weeks, years, decades, centuries, millenaries, or any other unit. The following were the various weeks, appointed under the Jewish ritual, for perpetual observance in Israel : — 1. The week of days. Gen. ii. 2, 3 ; Exod. xx. 2. The week of weeks. Pentecost. Lev. xxiii. 3. The week of months. Jewish sacred year. Lev. xxiii. 4. The week of years. Sabbatic year law. Lev. xxv. 5. The week of weeks of years. The Jubilee. Lev. xxv. (i.) The Week of Days. Taking them in the above order, we glance first at the natural week, of seven days, established in Eden, and the per- petual observance of which was enjoined under the law. To this week the Divine hand has attached, as we have seen, the idea of labour issuing in rest, of the stages of creature develop- ment terminating in maturity, and thus of the attainment by the creature, of moral and spiritual perfection. The sabbath expressed the entire complacency of God, and the entire satis- faction of man, in all that God had created and made. This was the period appointed under the Levitical law, for many of those consecrations, which Avere the impartation of ceremonial or typical perfection. The process of consecrating Aaron and his sons, to the work of the priesthood, that they might minister before the Lord, for Israel, lasted seven days. (Exod. xxix. 35.) That also of sanctifying the altar, that it might become an altar most holy, imparting sanctity to all that touched it, lasted similarly seven days. (Exod. xxix. 37.) Thus also the period of the duration of ceremonial unclean- ness, was in a number of cases, limited by seven days, at the close of which ceremonial purity was restored. On the birth of a male child for instance, a woman was considered unclean T -74 ninXE SYSTEM OF TIMES AND SEASONS. for sevm days (Lev. xii. 2). nor could the child, during that week, be circumcised. Circumcision could not take place till the eighth day. The firstborn of cattle devoted to God were not to be offered during the first seven days. " Sa-cn days shall it be with its dam, and on the eighth day thou shalt give it to Me " (Exod. xxii. 30). " On the eighth day and thenceforth it shall be accepted for an offering made by fire unto the Lord " (Lev. xxii. 27). Various other ceremonial observances, of a similar nature, were enacted in Israel. Defilement from a running issue, or from an issue of blood, lasted srrcn days. (Lev. xv. 13-19.) The suspected leper was to be shut up scrcii days, and even after he was pronounced clean, he was still to tarry abroad out of his tent sn'eti days. (Lev. xiii. 14.) Miriam, on account of her leprosy, was shut out of the camp seven days. (Num. xii. 14.) The house, or the garment infected with the plague 5f leprosy, were similarly to be shut up se^'oi days. Defilement by contact with the dead, also endured sei'cr, days, that is the ceremonial purity forfeited by this contact, could not be restored in less than seven days. (Num. xi.x. 11.) Thus the purification of the men, after the slaughter of the Midianites, lasted se7>en days. (Num-, xxxi. ig.) It is much insisted on in the law that the feast of unleavened bread should last " se-'eii days." Under pain of death, all leaven was, during this period, to be put away from Jewish dwellings. (Exod. xii.) The feast of tabernacles also lasted snrn days : " Ye shall rejoice before the Lord your God se7rn days, and ye shall keep it a feast unto the Lord, seven days in the year ; it shall be a statute for ever in your generations : ye shall celebrate it in the seventh month ; ye shall dwell in booths seven days " (Lev. xxiii. 36, 39). On the occasion of the siege of Jericho, seven priests bearing seven trumpets, compassed the city with the men of war, for se7rn days, and on the seventh day they went round it seven times, when the city fell. THE LAW OF COMTLETION IN WEEKS. 275 The week, with its concluding sabbath, is therefore deeply engraven in a variety of ways, on the whole Jewish ritual and history. Nor on Jewish history alone. Although in the Christian dispensation, the eighth day, or first day of a new week, is substituted for the creation sabbath, indicating that rest is to be found only in a iien' creation, only in resurrection, — yet still the weekly division of time, and the weekly day of holy rest, continue, witnessing as ever to the rest that remaineth for the people of God. For, — like the Lord's supper, which shows forth his death till He come, — the sabbath, and the Lord's day which has taken its place, glance both backward and onward. The first day of the week recalls the glad morn- ing of the resurrection, the completion of the redeeming work of Christ, just as the sabbath recalled the conclusion of the creation work of God ; and it foretells the remaining rest, when they that are Christ's shall rise at his coming. Thus wc rnay say, that three hundred thousand earthly Sabbaths line the road that lies behind the people of God, pointing each with outstretched hand, like so many guide-posts, in the same direction, and agreeing with overwhelming unanimity in their testimony to the blessed fact, that there remaineth a sabba- tism for the people of God. (ii.) The Week of Weeks. Next in order to the week of days came the ii