rp* GIFT OF v.; ••,..: i % 'If 1 > SANSKRIT KINDRED LITERATURES. SANSKRIT AND ITS KINDRED LITERATURES. Stutiies in Comparatt&e Jls^&ot'^SS^ BY LAURA ELIZABETH POOR. BOSTON: ROBERTS BROTHERS. 1880. Copyright, 1880, By Laura Elizabeth Poor. University Press: John Wilson and Son, Cambridge. PREFACE. This is not an encyclopaedia: therefore every author will not be found in it. It is an attempt, first, so to interest people in the new discoveries in literature as to induce them to study for them- selves ; in order to do this, only the greatest writers have been mentioned, and long extracts given from their works to illustrate the opinions stated ; second, to put all literature upon that new basis which has been created by the new sciences of comparative philology and compara- tive mythology. For this reason the greatest space has been given to the Sanskrit literature, which caused these discoveries, contains so many elements of all literature, and is so much less familiar. Some apology is perhaps necessary for writing anything upon the Greek philosophers and historians. But I was requested to add this IV PREFACE. chapter. The chapter on modern literature formed part of the original plan. If any should consider it irrelevant to these new discoveries, I should say, on the contrary, that the whole book is but a leading-up to that; for modern literature is the most elaborate expression of those ideas whose origin and growth I have endeavored to trace. CONTENTS. Chapter • Page I. The Origin of Literature 1 II. Brahmaxism and the Maha Bharata . . 37 III. Buddhism and the Ramayana .... 80 IV. Sanskrit Philosophy, Fable, and Drama 109 V. The Persian Literature, — Aryan and Semitic 143 VI. Comparative Mythology of the Greek Poetry and Drama 172 VII. Greek Philosophy and History .... 210 VIII. Comparative Mythology of the Latin AND Keltic Literatures 229 IX. Comparative Mythology of the Teutonic Literature. — Scandinavian Families . 267 X. Comparative Mythology of the Teutonic Literature. — Anglo-Saxon and Ger- man Families 298 I XI. Medieval Hymns, and Comparative My- thology OF the Medieval Ballads . . 329 XII. Comparative Mythology of Slavonic Literature 366 XIII. The Modern Poetry of Europe .... 405 Partial List of Books Consulted 453 Index 457 SANSKRIT AOT) ITS KINDEED LITEEATUEES. CHAPTEE I THE ORIGIN OF LITERATURE. IPEOPOSE to write about the literature of different nations and different centuries. I wish to show that this literature is not many, but one ; that the same leading ideas have arisen at epochs apparentl}' far separated from each other ; that each nation, however isolated it may seem, is, in reality, a link in the great chain of development of the human mind : in other words, to show the unit}- and continuit}^ of literature. This has only been possible within a few years. To the despairing school-boy of fifty years ago the histories of Phoenicians, Carthaginians, Eomans, or Greeks, were so man}' detached pieces of information to be fixed in the memory by dreary plodding. But the moment the mind realizes the might}' truth that one nation is connected with all others, its history becomes delightful and inspiring ; because we trace its method of reproducing the ideas we had met elsewhere. And it is to the Sanskrit language that we owe this entire change in our standpoint. Our subject in this chapter is the origin of literature ; but before we reach it we ought to have, therefore, a I ;i';SA>^^KJ[il'r AND ITS KINDRED LITERATURES. general idea of the Sanskrit language, its enormous importance, and its relations to modern science. Max IMuller says, "The discovery of Sanskrit is in many respects etjiially important, in some even more important, than the revival of Greek scholarship in the fifteenth century ; " that is the Renaissance. Former] 3' Greek and Latin were the boundary of knowledge in the direction of literature. Real students may liuve devoted a few thoughts to the ancient Egyp- tians ; but the average scholar who had conquered these literatures felt a serene consciousness of having explored tlie farthest domain of human thought in one line. Men were even satisfied to devote a lifetime to poring over one CJreek traged}' : Init within tlie last lumdred 3'ears a new language with its literature has become known, which has revolutionized all preconceived ideas ; created two new sciences, and possibly three. These are comparative philology ; that is, the stud}' of different languages : comparative mytholog}', the study of differ- ent religions : and Sir Henry Sumner Maine thinks that another science will soon be crvstalHzed, called com- parative jurisprudence, the study of the laws of different nations. A hundred years ago Sir William Jones and other KnglishnuMi living in India heard of a literary language of the Hindoos called Sanskrit. The name means a '* com- pleted " or " perfected" dialect in distinction from the Prakrit or " natural " dialect. It was a spoken language at the time of Solomon, 1015 n.c, also of Alexander, 3-4 B. c, but for the last two thousand years it has been kept alive like Latin in Kurope, by grammars and diction- aries, and an educated caste of men. Thev studied this THE ORIGIN OF LITERATURE. 3 language, "and were amazed to find that it contained many words resembling those of the European languages ; for example : — English. Sanskrit. Zend. Latin. Irish ) Keltic. / Gothic. » Teutonic, j Father pitar patar * pater athair fadar Mother matar matar mater mathair Brother bhratar bratar f rater brathair brothar Sister svasar quahar soror sulr svistar Daughter duhitar dughdhar dear dauhtar Door dvar fores dor daur Two do du duo Lord vis-patar or tribe father Slavic. weizpater. They published a gi'ammar of the language and trans- lations from the literature in 1785, 1787, 1789, 1794, and thus threw open Sanskrit to the European mind. Learned men of all nations eagerh^ studied and com- mented upon these books. Max Muller says, " The first who dared boldh* to face both the facts and conclusions of Sanskrit scholarship was the German poet, Frederic Schlegel. He was not a great scholar, many of his statements have since been proved erroneous ; but he was a man of genius, and when a new science is to be created, the imagination of the poet is wanted even more than the accuracy of the scholar." Man}- minds contributed to the great- work, and the new science of comparative philology was created. Max Muller sa3's, " I ma}- express my conviction that the science of language (comparative philology) will yet enable us to withstand the extreme theories of the evolutionists, and to draw a hard and fast line between 4 SANSKRIT AND ITS KINDRED LITERATURES. spirit and matter, between man and brute." In brief these are its conclusions. First : if a word is essentially the same in several langua.