n i ' - -. -* Jirbtr Uflttirr MARSKE. vx V ff AN HISTORICAL CATALOGUE OF THE SCOTTISH BISHOPS, BOSS vi-d for "Keith. Oaf;il""';i i 1 '! Scot o Publish*} h;i Bell & Br.ulfiitt. Edinburgh Ac. AN HISTORICAL CATALOGUE OF THE DOWN TO THE YEAH 1688 1 BY THE RIGHT REV. ROBERT KEITH. ALSO, AX ACCOUNT OF ALL THE Religious; THAT WERE IN SCOTLAND AT THE TIME OF THE REFORMATION : BY JOHN SPOTTISWOODE, ESQ. A NEW EDITION, CORRECTED, AND CONTINUED TO THE PRESENT TIME, WITH A LIFE OF THE AUTHOR: BY THE REV. M. RUSSEL, L.L.D. EDINBURGH : PRINTED FOR BELL & BRADFUTE, EDINBURGH ; A. BROWN & COMPANY, ABERDEEN; AND C. 8c J. RIVINGTON, ST. PAULAS CHURCH-YARD, AXD WATERLOO PLACE, PALL-MALL, LONDON. John Moir, Printer, Edinburgh, DESCRIPTION of the ARMS of the ARCH-EPIS- COPAL and EPISCOPAL SEES of SCOTLAND, from Edmonstorfs Heraldry. ABERDEEN'. Azure, a temple, Argent, St Michael stand- ing iu the porch, mitred and vested, proper ; his dexter hand ele- vated to heaven, praying over three children in a boiling cal- dron of the first, in his sinister hand a crosier. ARGTLE. Azure, two crosiers indorsed in saltier, Or, in chief, a mitre of the last. BRECHIN. Argent, three piles meeting in the point in base, Gule. CAITHNESS. Azure, a crown of thorns, Or, between three saltiers, Argent. DUNBLANE. Argent, a saltier engrailed, Azure. DUNKELD. Argent, a cross Calvary, sable, between two pas- sion nails, Gule. EDINBURGH. Azure, a saltier, Argent, in chief a mitre of the last, garnished, Or. GALLOWAY. Argent, St Ninian clothed in a pontifical robe, Purpure, on his head a mitre, and in his dexter hand a crosier, both Or, his sinister hand across his breast. GLASGOW. Argent, a tree growing out of a mount in base, surmounted by a salmon, in fesse, all proper, in his mouth an amulet, Or j on the dexter side a bell pendant to the tree grow- ing of the second. THE ISLES. Azure, St Columba in a boat at sea, all proper, in chief a blazing star, Or. MORAY. Azure, a church, Argent, St Giles in a pastoral ha- bit, proper, standing in the porch, holding in his hand an open book of the last j on his head a mitre, and in his dexter hand a passion cross, both Or. OEKNEY. Argent, St Magnus vested in royal robes, on his head an antique crown, in his dexter hand a sceptre, all proper. Ross. Argent, St Boniface, on the dexter, his hands across his breast, proper, habited, Gule j on the sinister, a bishop, vest- ed in a long robe, close girt, Purpure, mitred, Or, in his sinister hand a crosier of the last. Sx ANDREWS Azure, a saltier, Argent. TO HIS EXCELLENCY, JAMES FRANCIS EDWARD KEITH, SECOND SON OF THE RIGHT HON. WILLIAM KEITH, NINTH GREAT MARISCHAL OF SCOTLAND, AND HIMSELF VELT-MARECHAL IN THE ARMIES OF HIS MAJESTY THE KING OF PRUSSIA ; THIS HISTORICAL CATALOGUE OF THE SCOTTISH BISHOPS, DOWN TO THE REVOLUTION IN 1688, (A WORK FORMERLY VNATTE1HPTED) IS, WITH ALL DUE RESPECT, HUMBLY INSCRIBED, AS A TESTIMONY OF HIS REGARD, BY ROBERT KEITH. ADVERTISEMENT TO THE READER. (By Bishop Keith.) Is making up the following LIST of BISHOPS, I was greatly as- sisted by papers belonging to the Family of PANMCRE, which I received from a late noble representative of that family, reckon- ed to have been the best Antiquary in his time. Another person to whom I am much obliged, is the Honour- able WALTER MACFABLANE, Chief of that Name, universally ac- knowledged to be the first Antiquary in this kingdom. The readers will easily perceive how much I owe all along to this learned and knowing Gentleman. A third person, whose assistance I gratefully acknowledge, is Mr WALTER GOODALL in the Advocates Library, particularly for his accurate Account of the Culdees, &c. EDITOR'S PREFACE. THE Catalogue of the SCOTTISH BISHOPS, which had become extremely scarce and high-priced, is again presented to the public with such addi- tions and improvements as the nature of the work seemed to require. The reader will, however, be pleased to learn, that no liberties have been taken either with the language or the statements of Bishop Keith ; his volume now appearing, with a slight alteration in its external form, an exact re- print of the laborious work which he gave to the world near seventy years ago. The additions made to the historical part of the Catalogue, have been carefully kept separate, and are brought forward either in notes at the bottom of the se- veral pages to which they refer, or in the Ap- pendix at the end of the volume; and that these additions are not more numerous and more important, is chiefly to be ascribed to the in- defatigable industry of the original author, who appears to have left no source of information un examined, and no materials fit for his purpose unappropriated. The biographical sketch of the Bishop is, I regret to say, extremely meagre, and almost en- tirely destitute of those incidents which give to X EDITORS PREFACE. this kind of composition its greatest charm. But, it ought to be remembered, that he lived at a time when Episcopal clergymen mixed little with the world ; and when the transactions of their oppressed Communion were registered only in the confidence of one another, or committed to the equally precarious record of a private corres- pondence. All the materials, too, which have been used, I had to seek amidst the casual notices of literary journals or of public obituaries ; and it happened in this case, as in many others, that where most was expected least was obtained. It is proper to give notice, that the treatise which immediately follows the Life of Bishop Keith, appears in the first edition under the title of" Preface ;" whilst it is there so ambiguously in- troduced to the attention of the reader, that it has not generally been ascribed to its real author, the late Mr Goodall, librarian to the Faculty of Advocates. I have called it a Dissertation on the first Planting of Christianity in Scotland, and on the History of the Culdees ; founding the title on a reference to the two subjects to which it is exclusively devoted. In the additional obser- vations which I have ventured to make on the latter of these topics, I hope I shall not appear to have failed in expressing towards Dr Jamie- son the respect which I really feel for his character and acquirements. He has, no doubt, set an example of unrestrained discussion which would have warranted considerable freedoms on the part EDITOR'S PREFACE. xiii of an antagonist ; but, in opposing his conclusions relative to the Culdees, I wished never to for- get that he holds a high place in the literature of his country ; and that, as he is entitled to re- verence on account of his age, so has he a just claim to respectful forbearance on account of his well-founded reputation as a most industrious and successful author. The Appendix contains a brief outline of the history of the Scottish Episcopal Church since the Revolution, as also a list of the Bishops who have, during the period that has since elapsed, exercised the spiritual superintendence over her clergy. It was my intention to have extended considerably this portion of the work, and to have introduced into the lives of the more emin- ent of these prelates a greater variety of biogra- phical materials ; but it soon appeared that such an object was altogether incompatible with the main purpose of this republication, as well as with the limits to which it was originally meant to be confined. Where so little has been accomplished, it may appear unnecessary to acknowledge any great obligations for assistance or encouragement. It is but right however to observe, that the amount of the means or of the labour employed in anti- quarian research, is not always to be measured by the simple effect that is produced. The cramp and interminable reading in which such pursuits involve the most expert archaeologist, may be compared to a voyage of discovery in unknown xiv EDITOR'S PREFACE. seas, where the toil and the anxiety are equally great whether the explorer succeed or whether he fail in his endeavours, whether he make a va- luable addition to the knowledge of his contem- poraries, or only ascertain that there is nothing to be found. There is hardly any one who has undertaken to throw light on the antiquities of Scotland, who has not had to acknowledge the ready and most valuable assistance of Lieut.-General Hutton. This distinguished officer has long devoted all the leisure which the duties of an active profes- sion have permitted him to enjoy, to inquiries re- specting the ancient history, the arts, and the institutions, which distinguished our ancestors in this portion of the British empire. His know- ledge of ecclesiastical architecture, and his inti- mate acquaintance with the various orders of ascetics who inhabited our ancient monasteries, qualify him in a particular manner for a great work, to which it is said his attention has been many years directed, on the Religious Houses of Scotland. The curiosity of the learned could not fail to receive much gratification were the General to realise his important undertaking. For near- ly all the Notes contained in the Appendix, the reader is indebted to the friendly condescension of this most accomplished antiquary. My thanks are due to William Gordon of Fyvie, Esq. for the loan of a valuable copy of Keith's Catalogue, now in his possession, and for- merly, as I have understood, the property of EDITOR'S PREFACE. xv David. Macpherson, the editor of Wynton's Chronicle. I have a similar acknowledgment to make to Robert Graham, Esq. of Eskbank, for his polite attention in allowing me to peruse the notes contained in his copy of the same work, and inserted, as it would seem, by the Bishops Alexander and Forbes. I am particularly grateful to Patrick Eraser Ty t- ler, Esq. for his goodness in sending to me, unso- licited, the copy of Keith which belonged to his fa- ther, the late LordWoodhouselee, and which bears am pleevidenceof having passed through the hands of so able a scholar and antiquary. Had the limits prescribed to me by the plan of this republication allowed, I would have enriched the Appendix by extracting some valuable matter from Mr Tytler's recent Life of Sir Thomas Craig, a vo- lume which contains a rich fund of information and amusement, and which cannot fail to be high- ly appreciated by every intelligent reader. In mentioning the name of Dr Irving, I shall recal to the recollection of the reader the many obligations which the literature of Scotland owes to his talents and industry, to his extensive knowledge of books, and to the facilities which he has uniformly granted wherever his assistance was likely to prove useful. The Account of the Religions Houses is re- printed precisely as it appears in the former edition of Keith's Catalogue, and of Hope's Minor Practics. Having ascertained that the omissions of monasteries, nunneries, and other si- xvi EDITOR'S PREFACE. milar establishments, amount to near forty, and finding that a suitable history of them would increase this portion of the volume to an undue extent, I thought it better to make no alteration whatever, than to insert in the Appendix a mere list of names, dates, and localities. A proper Ac- count of the Religious Houses of Scotland re- mains a desideratum in antiquarian literature. As to the Coats of Arms., it is to be remarked that the plate exhibits nothing more than the heraldic emblems which distinguished the several Sees. In forming an Episcopal Seal, therefore, the paternal arms of the bishop by whom it is to be used must be quartered with those of his particular diocese. It was intended to give co- pies of some of the seals which were actually employed by certain bishops, during the esta- blishment of Episcopacy in Scotland ; but the defaced condition in which most of them appear- ed, and the expense of procuring accurate im- pressions of such as were more entire, prevented the publishers from gratifying their wish in this respect. The original foot-notes, in the historical part of the work, are distinguished by the Arabian numerals ; for those which are pointed out by the other class of references, and which are neither numerous nor very important, I am bound to hold myself responsible. M. R. Letih, V&& December 1823. LIFE OF BISHOP KEITH. OF this distinguished Author, one of whose works is now for the second time given to the public, very little remains of that kind of information which constitutes the most pleasant materials of literary biography. The depressed condition of the church to which he belonged, and the unhappy times in which he lived, rendered privacy not less a matter of neces- sity than of choice ; whilst, in all circumstances, the clergy- man who gives up his days to literature and to the duties of his profession, will almost inevitably find himself walking in that smooth and uniform path which presents few points whence the busy world can be seen, and gives rise to few incidents by which the attention of that world can be long or eagerly attracted. But, in the history of the most retired scholar, we may still hope to find those ordinary topics of biography, which communicate, to the curiosity of the reader, the time and the place where an author was born ; the se- rious pursuits to which he devoted his busy hours ; and the lighter studies by which he amused his leisure. We may also expect to discover some traces of those habits and predilections which give a certain species of individuality even to the monk amidst the unvaried routine of his cloister ; which mark the original character of the soul even under the mechanical and monotonous operation of fixed rules and customs, and of an undeviating submission to a paramount b XV111 LIFE OF BISHOP KEITH. authority ; which, in short, under the influence of the most unfavourable circumstances, indicate what a man would have been, had he lived in better days, and been blessed with a more active encouragement. In this brief sketch, there- fore, of Bishop Keith's personal history, we shall, perhaps, best attain the end we have in view, by arranging our scanty materials, first, as they respect his birth and family ; secondly, as they illustrate his clerical life ; and, lastly, as they tend to throw light upon his literary labours and pub- lications. In regard to the first topic, we are fortunately supplied with some well authenticated facts, furnished by himself, in two different forms. A few years before his death he was induced to yield to the importunity of a clerical friend, and to commit to him certain particulars relative to his early history, for which we should have looked in vain to any other quarter.* Much about the same time, too, he entered into a controversy with the late Mr Keith of Ravelston, in * This little piece of auto-biography begins as follows : ' I was born at ' TJras in the Mearns, on Monday Febniary 7. 1681, and named Robert ' after the Viscount of Arbnthnot, in the shire of Kincardine, who was a kind ' friend to mj father ; and suckled by my own mother, Marjory Arbuthnot 'My father, Alexander Keith, died Thursday January 25. 1683; and I ' have been told, that, in tlie course of hi* fever, he took me in his arms, ' dandled me, and said, " If I die at'this time, O ! that my keen cockie would ' go with me !" Besides my eldest brother Alexander, who had been married ' in the end of the preceding- year, I had three sisters,' &c. &c. N.B. The occasion of writing the above, says Bishop Forbes was this; ' Upon Bishop Keith's in forming me that he had, at the particular desire of ' Dr George Garden, translated a part of Dr Forbes' s Diary, 1 said that was ' a thing not at all known, and therefore it ought to be recorded in some pro- ' per way. He answered, " That I might note it down on a bit of paper, in 'any shape 1 pleased." " Xo, Sir," said I, " it would be far more advisable ' lhal you should leave sonic short account of yourself to posterity, under jour ' pwn hand." He thanked me for the hint, and said he would think of it. ' This happened ufter 1752, when he had left Edinburgh, and was living at ' 'Bonnyhaiigh, near Leitb.' LIFE OF BISHOP KEITH. regard to the comparative proximity of their several fami- lies to the noble race of the Earls Marischal ; and, in pursu- ance of the claims which he there urged in behalf of his ne- phews to the honour of a lineal descent, he thought proper to draw up a short statement of facts, to which he gave the title of a " Vindication of Mr Robert Keith, and of his young Grandnephew Alexander Keith, from the unfriendly representation of Mr Alexander Keith, jun. of Ravelston." From these documents, it appears that Bishop Keith was born on the 7th February 1681, at Uras, a small estate, of which his family possessed either the fee-simple, or what in Scotland is called the tcadset. Having lost his father while yet an infant, he was indebted for the knowledge of letters, and for the still more important lessons of early virtue and religion, to his mother ; who, when he had arrived at the age of se- ven years, removed with him to Aberdeen, where, on a very limited income, and chiefly by means of her own industry, she procured for him a good education both at school and college. This excellent person was thedaughter of Robert Ar- buthnot of Little Fiddes, in the county just named ; and her prudence and affection appear to have left a deep impression on the mind of her son. Alluding to her unceasing exertions in his behalf, he says, in the notes dictated to Bishop Forbes, " for these and many many other obligations I owe her memory, I do pay her much acknowledgment." " She died at Aberdeen,"" he adds, " on Saturday the 6th December 1707, about the 69th year of her age, after she had the comfort of seeing me preceptor or tutor to my young chief, the Lord Keith, from the month of July 1703 ; with whom and his brother I continued seven full years, till July 1710." The Bishop alludes to a report which had reached his ears, that he had likewise been tutor to Mr Alexander Garden of Troup, " This," says he, " is not correct. I was indeed a good acquaintance of theirs at college, and no more. Dur- ing my long abode at Aberdeen, I had the happiness to be much acquainted with the worthy and learned Dr George XX LIFE OF BISHOP KEITH. Garden, deprived minister of that city ; from whom I had the opportunity to receive many internal good books, for which I bless God to this day. And as the Doctor was em- ployed about that time in a new edition of the excellent works of the very learned Dr John Forbes of Corse, he was pleased to desire me to translate into Latin the last seven years of " Dr Forbes's Diary, or Vita Interior."" In the life of a Scotchman, however meanly born, the ar- ticle of pedigree, in the 17th century, was in all cases a con- sideration of some weight ; for if he had not to tell of here- ditary wealth or family honours, he was pleased with the assurance that his parents were virtuous, and perhaps with the tradition that their blood had been improved by some illustrious connexion. But, in this respect, Bishop Keith had more to boast of than Scottish churchmen usually have in modern times : and no one ever valued more highly his relationship with the noble and the great than did this humble pastor of a poor, depressed, and rather calumniated branch of Christ's catholic church. He was a cadet of the celebrated family of Keith, Earls Marischal of Scotland, being lineally descended from Alexander, the youngest son of William the third earl. In the year 1513, this noble- man conferred upon the ancestor of the Bishop the lands of Pittendrum in the shire of Aberdeen ; which grant is vouched by an attested copy of the precept of sasine, insert- ed in the controversial pamphlet to which we have already alluded. After the lapse of little more than a hundred years, we find the laird of Pittendrum in possession of the estate of " Over and Nether Cowtowns," in the shire of Mearns ; for which acquisition also the instrument of legal investment is produced at full length from the register of sasines. But the lands of Cowtowns passed away from the Bishop's fa- mily in the person of his immediate ancestor ; who, having denuded himself, as the phrase is, of that property, in the year 1672, purchased the estate of Uras, in the parish of Dunnotar and shire of Kincardine. As an apology for this LIFE OF BISHOP KEITH. XXI alienation of the family inheritance, the good Bishop thinks it necessary to add, in a note, that " this hasty denudation did not proceed from a squandering temper in my father, but from his having enlisted himself a volunteer in that expedition under King Charles II. (which ended in the unfortunate battle of Worcester) whilst a mere strippling only of about eighteen years of age ; and although he had the good for- tune to escape out of prison by the means and contrivance of two English ladies, yet the difficulties he was exposed to, and the incumbrances which naturally came upon his small estate during the long continuance of the rebellion, stuck severely to him all his days after, and do stick to his off- spring to this day." Having mentioned the misunderstanding which arose between the Bishop and the late Mr Keith of Ravelston, respecting the relationship of their families to the an- cient race of the Earls Marischal, I may be permitted to state, on the authority of the present representative of that noble house, Sir Alexander Keith, that the superior claims of the Bishop in behalf of his nephew were unques- tionably well founded ; and that so long as the Uras branch of the Pittendrum Keiths existed in the male line, the Keiths of Ravelston were not entitled to the honour to which they have since succeeded. About a month after he retired from the situation of pre- ceptor to his noble relatives, he was admitted to the order of Deacons by the Right Reverend George Haliburton, bi- shop of Aberdeen ; and in November following, he informs us, he became domestic chaplain to Charles Earl of Errol and his mother the Countess. In the month of June 1712, he accompanied his Lordship to the baths of Aix-la-Chapelle : and in passing through Holland he was greatly delighted with an opportunity of enjoying the acquaintance and con- versation of the celebrated M. Poiret. In the course of their journey he was also gratified with a short residence in Am- sterdam, Rotterdam, Dort, Leyden, Utrecht, Nemuegen, XXU LIFE OF BISHOP KEITH. Cleves, and Cologne : and leaving his Lordship at Aix, he returned homewards through Maestricht, Antwerp, Ghent, Bruges, ..Ostend, Newport, and Dunkirk. "At this last place," says he, " I took ship ; but we were soon obliged to put into Calais. Next day we set sail again for England, but met with a most prodigious storm of wind, insomuch that some ships were lost just in the passage near to us. However, it pleased God that I landed safe at Dover, St Michael's day 1712, where I remained a long time very tender through the wet and cold during the storm. I set out in the stage coach for Edinburgh, February 2. 1713." The Bishop seems naturally to havepossessed that peculiar turn of mind which leads to the investigation of antiquities, and which appears to derive the most exquisite gratification from ascertaining even the minutest relations of a genealo- gical table. In his Vindication, accordingly, the reader will find the most precise and regularly authenticated statements of ah 1 such transactions in which his family were concerned, as might in the least degree illustrate the purity of their descent, and the respectability of their connections. For in- stance, after furnishing a copy of the contract of marriage between his grandfather and grandmother, and having spe- cified that the latter was the daughter of Gawn Douglas of Easter Barras, he adds in a note, " This Gawn Douglas was a son of that laird of Glenbervy who became earl of Angus about the year 1588, and by this marriage Mr Robert Keith (himself) and his nephew have the honour to be related to the dukes of Douglas and Hamilton, and to all the branches of these most honourable families since that marriage." Alluding, again, to the kindred of his mother, he remarks, that, by her marriage into the family of Keith, their posterity " are related to all the Arbuthnots and Burnets in the shire of Mearns." He concludes his Vindication, too, in the same spirit of family love, and with a just sense of the importance which LIFE OF BISHOP KEITH. XX111 attached to the discussion in which he had been so success- fully engaged. " Mr Robert Keith hopes that all his friends, and every un- prejudiced person into whose hands this paper may chance to fall, (for he has only printed some few copies to be pri- vately given away,) will have him excused for vindicating his own and nephew's birth ; For although he himself, now in the close of the seventieth year of his age, and having only one daughter, might be pretty indifferent about any thing of this nature, yet he suspects his young grandnephews, (for there are no less than three of them, Alexander, Ro- bert, and John,) when they came of age, might reproach the memory of their uncle, and justly perhaps, for his not en- deavouring to set their birth at rights against so flagrant an attack, seeing the one was capable, and the others might not have the same means of knowing, or the same abilities to perform it. 11 2. The clerical life of Bishop Keith, as it was not diver- sified by any great variety of incidents, so will it not be ex- pected to receive from the pen of the biographer that inte- rest which an ample detail of ecclesiastical transactions, and a full display of professional eminence and official busi- ness, would unquestionably have conferred upon it. The period at which he entered the church was distinguished rather by the unsettled and anxious feelings which were still active in the minds of Episcopalians than by any decisive resolution founded on their supposed attachments, or even by any loud expression of their sentiments, whether religious or political. The times required prudence ; and the clergy, in general, seem not to have been deficient in that cardinal virtue. Their situation demanded that they should suffer rather than act ; and the meek, yet firm spirit, with which they met the severest penalties that were ever directed against a religious society, in a Protestant country, deserves the highest praise. But these circumstances, however fa- vourable to the production of the Christian fruits of pa- XXIV LIFE OF BISHOP KEITH. tience, stedfastness, and long-suffering, were necessarily al- together unprolific with respect to those events which give the greatest interest to the page of the annalist, and afford to biography one of its greatest charms. Hence arises that scarcity of material which the historian of Scottish 'Episco- pacy, as it has existed since the Revolution, has uniformly had to lament ; and hence, too, that absence, almost entire, of those minor but not less important facts which throw light on the motives of the principal actors, and enable us to engraft on biography all the information, and more than the instruction and amusement, which belong to a mere historical narrative. Mr Keith, as has been already stated, was ordained a deacon on the 16th of August 1710. On his return from the Continent, after his engagement with Lord Errol, he was invited by a congregation in Edinburgh to become their minister : and he was accordingly raised to the priest- hood, by Bishop Haliburton, on the 26th of May 1713. It is worthy of remark, that he continued in the same charge till the day of his death. The talents and learning of such a man could not fail, even in the miserable times wherein his lot was cast, to pro- cure for him a certain degree of influence in the church to which he had attached himself, and even to establish his character among those of a different communion, as an able scholar, historian, and antiquary. He is, accordingly, found taking an active share in all the measures that were proposed, either for restoring purity of worship, or for prop- ping the pillars of that ecclesiastical system, in the divine institution of which he appears to have cordially believed, and for the maintenance of which he spared no labour and grudged no sacrifice. There remains a number of letters which passed between him and Bishop Smith of England, respecting the affairs of the two non-juring churches ; and throughout the whole of this long correspondence, Mr Keith supported with much temper as well as learning the LIFE OF BISHOP KEITH. XXV soundest views of ecclesiastical polity, and the most ortho- dox opinions in point of Christian doctrine. Nothing of consequence, indeed, appears to have been done without his advice or concurrence, even before he was raised to the episcopate. His consecration, however, took place on the 18th of June 1727 ; the sacred office being performed at Edinburgh by Bishops Miller, Rattray, and Gadderar : And, from this period, the influence of his wise and moderate policy, in the business of the church, appears in several happy results to which he conducted the counsels of his brethren. He was openly and decidedly hostile to the fool- ish measures which were pursued by some of his colleagues ; who could not all at once throw off the Erastian prejudice, that the power of a religious society is not complete without the co-operation and sanction of the civil magistrate. He de- precated, with much earnestness, certain proceedings which took place in consequence of this very groundless opinion ; and, in reference to ecclesiastical patronage and preferment at large, he recommended a speedy recurrence to the max- ims and practice of primitive times. In regard to the usages, again, a subject at once the most delicate and seducing on which the zeal of a Protestant could be exercised, he was equally opposed to innovation, even on those points, in sup- port of which it might have been easy to adduce a strong oody of ancient authority, and to find a warrant in the ri- tual of the purest period of the church. Accordingly, when at length, in the year 1731, it was resolved to refer the matters at issue to the decision of a friendly conference, Bishop Keith was named by the one party to meet with Bishop Gillan, who had been appointed by the other, in order to pave the way for a final concordate, by which the future practice of the church might be ascertained and established. The first article of agreement was expressed as follows : " We shall only make use of the Scottish or English liturgy in the pub- lic divine service, nor shall we disturb the peace of the church by introducing into the public worship any of the XXVi LIFE OF BISHOP KEITH. ancient usages, concerning which there has been lately a difference amongst us."" Since the usages have been, in this incidental manner, in- troduced to the notice of the reader, he may not be dis- pleased to have some farther account of them laid before him ; especially as they are frequently made the subject of allusion in certain publications connected with the history of the Nonjurors both in England and Scotland. Referring to the controversies which were occasioned by these usages, Mr Skinner* observes that, " we shall find the source of them in England, whence it reached Scotland some years before Bishop Rose's death, but was kept under all his time by the respect and deference universally paid to his authority. We have seen how the first communion-office of Edward VI. was altered, and how, with these alterations confirmed by Parliamentary sanction, it has been in use in England ever since. Notwithstanding this legal decision, many eminent divines of that church, both before and after the Revolution, still thought well of the first book, and of our Scotch office, which was composed on that plan, as be- ing in some material articles more conformable to all the eucharistical offices that are extant than the present book of England, Avhich these very divines acknowledge to be defective in expression, however much their church may be, as they plead, orthodox and sound in the intention. " When the Revolution had broken the English church into two communions, many of the ejected clergy, and, among the rest, the celebrated Dr Hickes, thinking them- selves no longer tied down by Parliamentary decrees in their sacerdotal administrations, wished to revive those ancient usages, which they saw the English Reformation had begun with in the eucharistic service, of, 1st, Mixing water with the wine ; 2d, Commemorating the faithful departed : 3d, * See Ecclesiastical History of Scotland, Vol. II. LIFli OF BISHOP KEITH. XXV11 Consecrating the elements by an express invocation : and, 4thly, Using the oblatory prayer before distribution, as in pur present Scottish form. Others of them were for ad- hering to the office as it stood established by law, and autho- rized by long practice, which the intended revival, they said, seemed to condemn. This difference of sentiment, in so important a point, produced conferences and writings from both sides without any effect, but with no heat on ei- ther side as long as Bishop Hickes lived, whom, for his piety and judgment, they all equally revered. But, upon his death, on the 15th of December 1715, Bishop Jeremy Collier, the laborious church historian, being now the senior bishop in that succession, and a man of much warmth of temper as well as extent of learning, appeared keenly at the head of the Us A GEES, as we shall now call them, and being supported by an able party, among whom was the well-known Dr Brett, pressed the reception of the four primitive points with great vigour and strength of argument. At the head of the other party was Bishop Nathaniel Spincks, formerly one of the prebendaries of Sarum, and rector of S.t Martins in that diocese, who, with his followers, chiefly rested their opposition on the necessity of keeping close to the second book, which had received both a civil and eccle- siastical sanction. " For terminating, if possible, these differences, it was agreed, on both sides, to consult the Scottish bishops, and refer the matter wholly to their decision. To this purpose a Mr Peck came down from the Usagers in 1718, and made application, both to Bishop Rose and Bishop Falconar, for a sy nodical determination ; which they prudently declined, but were willing to act as mediators and friends to both sides, recommending peace and forbearance of authority, till peo- ple's minds be cleared and properly disposed for a reception of those primitive practices. Bishop Spincks, too, from the other side, wrote to these two bishops, to engage them in ,his favour, but met with the same return ; yet, to testify XXV111 LIFE OF BISHOP KEITH. their readiness to do what they could for preventing a rup- ture among friends, they employed Dr Rattray of Craig- hall in Perthshire, a man of singular knowledge in eccle- siastical literature, and who afterwards came to be a bright ornament to our church in a higher sphere, to draw up pro- posals of accommodation for reconciling these differences ; which, at their request, he did with great candour and mo- deration, without entering critically, as he well could, into the merits of the cause, but only wishing both parties to con- descend so far, for peace's sake, as to communicate occasion- ally with one another in holy offices, according to the res- pective form of them whose privilege it was to officiate at the time. This paper, though approved by Bishop Rose, as " being written with much judgment, full of Christian temper, and making much for peace,"" yet, as the Bishop feared, had the common fate of all such reconciling schemes, not to give the satisfaction intended by it, at the same time that neither party could find fault with it." The spirit which prevailed in the church for nearly twen- ty years after the date of the above transactions, and parti- cularly after the demise of the good Bishop Rose, proves but too clearly that the Scottish prelates, who were origin- ally engaged in the question as mediators and umpires, soon became deeply interested as parties, and eagerly employed themselves in its discussion as individual controversialists. The zeal displayed on both sides greatly exceeded the impor- tance of the subject which had excited it. Remonstrances, injunctions, and pastoral admonitions, the usual resources of churchmen when the more ordinary methods of convincing the understanding are found ineffectual, were issued as well by the Usagers as by those who opposed the revival of those obsolete ceremonies. The peace of the church was inter- rupted, and her stability and usefulness were seriously me- naced ; for which reasons the prudence and moderation em- ployed by Bishop Keith, in paving the way for a final agree- ment among the leading men on both sides, cannot be too LIFE OF BISHOP KEITH. highly extolled. The accommodation of these unfortunate differences seems indeed to have given much satisfaction, even to those persons who were known to have made the greatest sacrifices in point of opinion and predilection. In a letter from Bishop Rattray to Bishop Keith, the former quotes an expression as used by Bishop Gillan, who trusted that " it would not, through God's grace, be in the power of men or of devils to disturb that happy union with which he has been pleased to bless us." As soon as Bishop Keith was invested with the Episcopal office in 1727, he was intrusted with the superintendence of the extensive district of Caithness, Orkney, and the Isles. As he continued to reside in Edinburgh, we are not informed in what way he discharged the duties incident to that labo- rious appointment. There are extant, no doubt, several re- cords, which shew that he was from time to time employ- ed in providing his remote diocese with competent clergymen, as well as with other means of Christian knowledge and divine grace ; but there remains, notwithstanding, no small degree of obscurity, both in regard to the precise manner in which he exercised his Episcopal functions, and also as to the extent of the period during which he continued bi- shop of Caithness and of the Isles. As an instance of the difficulties which attach to the latter point, it may be observed that, while there is the evidence of unimpeachable vouchers for his becoming bishop of Fife in the year 1733, there is proof no less satisfactory that he conti- nued to perform, in behalf of Orkney and Caithness, the se- veral offices of a bishop down to a date considerably more re- cent. Among the numerous papers preserved at Aberdeen, there are two original deeds certifying the ordination both to the diaconate and priesthood of Mr James Winchester ; and these ordinations are distinctly stated to have been per- formed " by Bishop Keith for Orkney, 11 in the years 1749 and 1751, " juxta morem ecclcsice ScoticancE.^ Tacked to these deeds there is an original letter from some gentlemen XXX LIFE OF EISHOP KEITH. in Stornoway, a part of the Long Isle, dated July 22, in the year 1738, and addressed to Bishop Keith, in which they " thank him most kindly for his care of them, in sending among them the Rev. Mr John Williamson of Sky."" There is even a second original letter in the same repository, from Mr James Taylor at Thurso, 12th July 1757, address- ed to Mr Robert Forbes, expressing " his surprise how any could call in question Bishop Keith being acknowledg- ed bishop of Caithness and Orkney." But in whatever way these facts are to be reconciled, there is no doubt that Bishop Keith was preferred to the superintendence of Fife in the year 1733, and that he re- signed the same on the 23d of August 1743. It was in the last of these years that the diocese of Edinburgh be- came vacant by the death of Bishop Rattray, who appears to have been elected in 1743 by the clergy of that city, (though I have met with no evidence to satisfy me that he ever entered upon the Episcopal duties of the metropolis,) upon which event, some intention seems to have been en- tertained of appointing Bishop Keith his successor ; and the resignation of Fife, by the latter, which took place in the same year, does unquestionably give a certain degree of countenance to the rumour which was propagated on this subject. But the Bishop used considerable pains to re- move the impression which that report had created among his brethren. In a letter to Mr Thomas Auchinleck, he makes a formal declaration that he never, in any shape, solicited to be bishop of Edinburgh, but that, on the con- trary, he had declined the appointment when actually offer- ed to him. The " nolo Episcopari" has, no doubt, been long regarded as an innocent expression of pious insincerity, a phrase which is never meant to be interpreted too liter- ally or remembered too long : still, in circumstances such as those which belong to the Episcopal church in these nor- thern parts, we cannot imagine that a man of Bishop Keith's character could be exposed to disappointment by having LIFE OF BISHOP KEITH. XXXI his services rejected ; and far less can we believe that he would violate truth, even to heal the wounds of mortified ambition. At the consecration of a successor to Bishop Rattray in the diocese of Dunkeld, which was performed at Edinburgh by the Bishops Keith, Falconar, White, and Rait, it was resolved by these fathers, that they should constitute them- selves into a regular synod for transacting the public busi- ness of the church ; on which occasion Mr Keith was un- animously chosen PRIMUS, and Mr Alexander, the new bishop, was appointed clerk. Availing themselves of the ecclesiastical knowledge and matured experience of the late Primus, Rattray, the bishops, being thus met together, proceeded to take into consideration the draught of certain canons which he had bequeathed to them, for the more formal exercise of their authority in the government of their districts; and, after a deliberate conference, they succeeded, as well by making suitable alterations on those with which they were thus furnished, as by drawing up several new ones, in producing a set of rules which gain- ed at once the universal acceptance of the clergy, and also proved of considerable use in promoting uniformity of senti- ment as well as of practice, in almost all the professional matters concerning which they had been formerly divided. It is a trite observation, that the man who most conscien- tiously does his duty is not always rewarded with the first burst of popular praise; and we find, accordingly, that Bishop Keith was by no means beloved by the presbytery of Edin- burgh , among whom he had been so many years resident. He was seldom asked by any of them to perform in their congre- gations the offices peculiar to his Order ; and if we were to judge from a variety of addresses, remonstrances, and replies, which are still on record, we should say that his intercourse with the inferior clergy was almost entirely confined to dis- putes about the limits of Episcopal jurisdiction, and the pri- XXX11 LIFE OF BISHOP KEITH. vileges of the priesthood.* The presbyters of Edinburgh, who, at the period in question, used to elect a moderator, and assume considerable powers as a regular and standing presbytery > were extremely jealous of any higher authority in the church ; whilst the bishops, on the other hand, re- gulating their proceedings by a regard to abstract principle and ancient usage, rather than by a due consideration of the circumstances in which late events had placed their Com- munion, and still less by views of mere expediency, appear, on several occasions, to have aimed at the possession of a degree of power the exercise of which would inevitably have sunk the second Order of ministers into absolute in- significance. The enactment of canons in 1743, as laws re- gulating the practice and defining the obedience of the whole * The following Protest and Appeal will show that Bishop Keith had, on one occurrence at least, great reason to complain of irregularity on the part of an Episcopal brother, who seems to have given countenance to the presbyters of Edinburgh in pursuing a very unbecoming line of conduct. Mr Spens, it appears, disapproved entirely of the uncanonical measure, of which he was made the occasion, and embraced the earliest opportunity to make his acknow- ledgement of the irregularity to his proper Supeiior. " I, Mr Robert Keith, bishop of the district of Fife, understanding that several of the presbyters of Edinburgh are now employed, by order of the bi- shop of that district, in taking tryal of Mr Nathaniel Spens, belonging to my jurisdiction, do hereby protest against the uncanonical practice, and against you Mr Thomas Auchinleck, Mr Thomas Mowbray, Mr William Harper, Mr Alex. Robertson, Mr. Alex. Mackenzie, Mr Patrick, and David Rait, and all others as if named, that shall employ themselves as aforesaid, or that recom- mend the said Mr Nathaniel Spens to the bishop of Edinburgh, or any other bishop, for receiving of holy orders without my consent ; and I do likewise here- by appeal to the bishops of this church in their first meeting for redress, if you shall presume to proceed any farther, this my protestation notwithstanding. In witness whereof, I have written and signed this instrument of Protest and Appeal at Edinburgh, the third day of February 1738, and have appointed the same to be given in in my name to the persons concerned, by Mr John Mac- kenzie, my colleague, one of the presbyters of Edinburgh, who is likewise to do all other things required herein. " Sic wbscr. " ROBERT KEITH." LIFE OF BISHOP KEITH. XXXlii church, without desiring the advice or concurrence of any of the presbyters, was a stretch of prerogative which could not prove agreeable to the latter description of clergy ; and although the bishops might have no difficulty in proving that they had not, on this occasion, exceeded the limits of the authority inherent in their Order, and which had been frequently exercised by the rulers of the church in the purest times of Christianity, they would yet have attained their ob- ject more effectually by conceding a little to the spirit of the age and the wishes of their brethren. The share which Bishop Keith had in this rather un- seemly controversy will serve as an excuse for the mention which has been made of it in this place. His local situa- tion as being resident in the metropolis, his official station as Primus, and, above all, perhaps, his personal influence as a man of business as well as of letters, will account for the prominent part he acted as the representative and advocate of the Episcopal synod. But the events of 1745 and of the following year engaged the country, and especially the church over which Bishop Keith presided, in a struggle of a different character; the result of which, and the consequences which attended that result in reference to Scottish Episco- pacy, are too important to be detailed in a biographical outline, and have been already laid before the world in a variety of publications. Of the public life of this eminent Prelate, I cannot dis- cover any notices more recent than the year 1744. The pressure of the penal laws inflicted by the Government, in 1746 and 1748, seems to have silenced even the voice of controversy. About the year 1752, he left his usual residence in the Canongate, and fixed his abode in the neighbourhood of Leith,on a small property called Bonnyhaugh, which after- wards descended by inheritance to his daughter and grand- daughter. Whether he continued to perform the duties of his chapel in Edinburgh, and to retain the office of Primus, I have no means of determining ; for, short as the interval XXXIV LIFE OF BISHOP KEITH. is since this distinguished person died, a cloud has already sunk down on many of those smaller events in his history, the knowledge of which could not have failed to throw a strong light both on his character and on the fortunes of the church, at a most interesting crisis. 3. The literary labours of Bishop Keith are well known to every scholar and antiquary. His greatest work, " The History of the Affairs of Church and State in Scotland, from the beginning of the Reformation in the reign of King James V. to the retreat of Queen Mary into Eng- land," is chiefly esteemed for the immense collection of authentic documents with which he contrived to enrich it. " Such a book," said Bishop Smith, his correspondent and antagonist, " will stand the test of ages, and will always be valued, because no fact is related but upon the best autho- thority."" The author, it is true, has not escaped the charge of partiality in his views, and of a certain bias in his rea- soning : but he has always been allowed the merit of a full and candid statement of events, whatever might be their ef- fect upon his own conclusions; and has never been taxed, even by the most uncharitable adversaries, with mutilating re- cords, either to screen the reputation of a friend or to im- peach the motives of an enemy. His stately volume, there- fore, will never cease to occupy a respectable place in the library of the historian ; and every reader who is desirous to have an intimate acquaintance with the annals of Scot- land during the troubled and afflicted times which followed upon the death of our fifth James, will regret that Bishop Keith did not live to complete his arduous undertaking. It appears that he left, at his death, a few sheets of the se- cond volume. These, with certain other manuscripts, must have passed into the hands of his daughter's family ; but all the inquiry that I have made respecting them, has only satisfied me that they are no longer in existence. .'-* LIFE OF BISHOP KEITH. XXXV From a casual notice, contained in a letter addressed to Bishop Rait, there is reason to believe that Bishop Keith published, about the year 1743, some " Select Pieces of Thomas a Kempis" translated into English. In his preface to the second volume of these Pieces, he has introduced some addresses to the Virgin Mary; for which impru- dence, as it was deemed in those evil days of calumny and reproach, he thought it necessary to enter into some expla- nation with his more scrupulous brethren. The Catalogue of the Scottish Bishops, which has proved the most popular of his works, was given to the .world in the year 1755. It was dedicated to the celebrated Mar- shal Keith, at that time in the service of the Prussian monarch ; and a copy of it was sent to Berlin, accompanied with the following letter, which, together with the answer, is here inserted for the amusement of the reader. To His Excellency Velt MAHECHAL KEITH, Berlin. SIR, This comes by Robert Keith, my grand-nephew, and son to Alexander Keith of Uras, who was your servant at the time I had the honour to be preceptor to you and your brother, the Earl. This lad's elder brother, Alexander, was at Paris last year ; and as he was bred a sailor, the Earl was pleased to take particular care of him, and to provide for him according to his education. Your Excellency will see how I have been employed of late, from the book herewith sent ; three copies of which come to your hands, one for the King of Prussia, a second for the Earl, and a third for yourself, by this same young man ; whom hereby I beg to recommend to your patronage and friendship : and as he inclines to be bred to the sea, he may perhaps turn out to be useful to the King of Prussia ; for the boy is abundantly smart, and has a good genius. He will likewise put into your Excellency's hands a copy XXXVI LIFE OF BISHOP KEITH. of the genealogy of his forefathers, to the which I was prompted by the pretensions of another, as you will see.* About a year ago, at the particular desire of the Earl, I transmitted to you by post a tree of the family ; and I would be glad to know if it came safe to your Excellency's hands. I heartily wish you all happiness ; and, most respect- fully, am, Sir, your Excellency's most obedient humble Servant, ROBERT KEITH. Bonnyhaugh, near Leith, 1 Oct. 6. 1755. j To BISHOP KEITH, at Bonytown, near Leith. SIR, I am infinitely obliged to you for the present you have made me of the book, but much more so for that of your nephew, who is one of the prettiest liveliest boys I ever saw, and, according to all appearance, will very well deserve, and perfectly answer the best education I can give him ; in which I shall spare nothing that I think necessary for his future advancement. As I see that he has no tinc- ture of Latin, I think it now too late to begin him to it ; and therefore shall endeavour to make up that loss to him by the living languages. French and German he will learn by custom here, where these two are equally spoken ; and I shall give him a master for Italian. As to the sciences which are most useful to one designed for a military life, (and that is the only one by which he can think to succeed here,) I have already begun to makef teach him geography and drawing, in both which he makes extraordinary pro- gress ; and in a short time, I hope, he will be in a condi- tion to begin a course of geometry and fortification, after * The genealogy here alluded to is the controversial tract from which extracts have been, taken in a former part of this memoir, f [A French manner of expression.] LIFE OF BISHOP KEITH. XXXvii which he shall study history, but more particularly modern, from about the time of Charles V. This is the plan I have laid down to myself for his education ; for the which I have still four years (if I live so long) before his age permits him to enter into the army. As yet I find not any fault in his natural disposition. With the greatest vivacity, he is surprisingly tractable ; and I can safely say, I never saw a more promising boy. But, poor child ! I pity him, since my age, which you know is near sixty,* can hardly give me any reasonable hope of seeing him far enough ad- vanced before my death to be able to push his fortune af- terwards. But you may depend on it, that, both on your account and his own, I shall do all that lies in my power for his advantage. As the king does not understand English, and has no books of that language in his private libraries, I have put the one addressed to him in the public one at Berlin, for which he thanks you ; and the other, which is designed for my brother, I shall send to him to Neufchatel by the first sure occasion. As I have been always persuaded that you preserve your ancient friendship for me, I know it will not be disagreeable to you to know, that, after having been troubled for four years with an asthma, I am now perfectly cured of it by the waters of Carlsbad, which I drank last summer, and am now as well as ever I was in my life. I shall al- ways be glad to hear of the continuation of your health ; for, believe me, nobody is with more friendship and regard, Sir, your most humble and most obedient Servant, JAMES KEITH. Potsdam, March 13. 1756. * He was killed in battle in the year 1758, at the age of sixty-two; for, by an extract from the baptism register of St Fergus, it appears thai M. Keith was baptized by the name of James Francis Edward, at Inverngie, the principal seat of the ancient family of Marischal, on the 15th of June 169G, which wai the next day after ke was born. XXXV111 LIFE OF BISHOP KEITH. The good Bishop appears to have been not a little grati- fied by the attention of his illustrious relative and ancient pupil, the Field-marshall. We accordingly find that, in the course of the same month in which the above reply was written, he addressed to him another epistle, in the following terms ; May it please your Excellency, I am honoured with your extraordinary favour of the 13th instant ; for your Excellency's letter is a real cordial in my old age, and has cheered my heart not a little, especially as it brings me the refreshing account of your being so well pleased with Bob Keith, who is certainly a fine boy, and is happy in a re- markable sweetness of temper. I am much pleased with the plan of education you have laid down for him, and do most sincerely return my hearty thanks for the kind recep- tion your Excellency has honoured him with, and for that remarkable care you are pleased to take of him. I hope you shall have much satisfaction in him, and that he will answer all your expectations. In a late trial* before our Court of Justiciary, my book was called for, and plentiful use was made of it by lawyers on both sides; so that your Excellency's name has made its appearance at that bar. I am particularly honoured by his Majesty of Prussia in condescending to thank me for a copy of my book ; which meets with approbation from the public, particularly among the curious : and the more so as it bears your Excellency's name, with which some persons are par- ticularly delighted, both in Scotland and in England. I am just now drinking, in a glass of claret, all health and happiness to your Excellency, and all your connections, whom may God long preserve. I am entered upon the se- * The case of Mr Hugh Macdonald, brother to the laird of Morar, of the Oanranald family, his being banished forth out of Scotland for being a Popish bishop. Sec Scots Mag for 1756, p. 100. LIFE OF BISHOP KEITH. venty-sixth year of my age, and am obliged to use the hand of another in writing ; but I thank God I keep health sur- prisingly well for my age, though I am much failed in my feet. I am much pleased that your Excellency is recovered of your asthma ; and I hope you shall count more years than I have done yet. I have the honour to subscribe myself, Sir, your Excellency's very much obliged and most humble Servant, ROBERT KEITH. Bonmjhaugh, near Leith, Mareli 30, 1756. Addressed, To His Excellency ) Velt-Marechal KEITH, Berlin, j P. S. I am to send, in a present to your Excellency, a copy of my History of the Affairs of Scotland, &c. put up in a box, and addressed to the care of Mr Stevens, to whom it shall be sent by some Hamburgh vessel. As Bob Keith is to study history, it will not be amiss that he should look into my History, especially as it relates to the troubles and distresses of the much injured Mary, Queen of Scots. Do me the honour to let me know when the said copy of my History comes to your Excellency's hand ; for I intend to dispatch it by the first ship that offers. A DIEU. This epistle, which is now for the first time seen in print, betrays, no doubt, in one or two passages, the garrulity of age, as well, perhaps, as some portion of that innocent self- complacency in which even a wise man may indulge after dinner, whilst drinking in claret the health of a noble cor- respondent, and contemplating the rapid increase of his own literary fame. The reader who cannot sympathise with the feelings which the Bishop expresses in the above letter may pronounce himself a stranger to some of the most powerful motives which awaken learned industry, and to some of the most delightful sentiments which glow in the human breast. LIFE OF BISHOP KEITH. In the dedication to the Field-Marshal, it will be observed, he describes the Catalogue as a work formerly unattempted. It is true that a distinct and connected list of all the Prelates who had filled the Scottish sees prior to the Revolution, is no where else to be found ; but it is not less true, at the same time, that separate catalogues for the different dioceses are to be found in a variety of publications considerably more ancient than that now before us. But, without entering into controversy as to the originality of the plan, the work of Keith will be acknowledged to possess very high claims upon the approbation of the learned. It is a book of deep research ; and is now very justly considered as a decisive authority on all points to which its enquiries extend. It has, of consequence, been allowed a place in that short list of historical publications which, Mr Pinkerton says, " are in- dispensably necessary to the library of a Scottish antiquary." Besides the works we have mentioned, it appears that the Bishop had, at least, projected others at an advanced pe- riod of his life. There was found among his posthumous manuscripts, a Treatise on Mystical Divinity, drawn up in the form of letters addressed to a lady ; as also a Scheme of Religion derived solely from the Scriptures, and intend- ed, it was thought, for the use of his own family.* Nor does it appear that he confined his attention to his- tory and divinity. He was a lover of archaeology hi all its branches. The two following letters, which are copied from the originals preserved in the Marischal college of Aberdeen, will shew that he had directed his thoughts with much success to the study of our ancient coins, and to the progressive improvement of the European mint. * The statement in the text is given on the authority of Bishop Alexander, late of Alloa, who appears to have consulted Mrs Keith after the death of her husband, and even to have inspected all the literary papers committed to her custody. Bishop Alexander made this enquiry in order to answer a ques- tion put to him by an " English clergyman," who was desirous to know whe- ther Bisobp Keith " had left any posthumous works behind him." LIFE OF BISHOP KEITH- xli Edinburgh, April 7. 1750. Dear Sir, Two or three weeks ago, I desired our brother, Mr Alexander, to deliver the silver penny I formerly men- tioned to a gentleman of your town, that he might put it into your hands, with orders for you to retain it in your custody till I should write you ; which I hope the gentle- man has honestly done. The penny, you see, is very fair and entire. The inscription on the king's side, u David Dei Gra. Rex Scotorum ;" the legend on the reverse, " Dns. P.tector ms. et Lib.ator ms." which you know is for " Do- minus Protector meus et Liberator meus ;" and within the inner circle, " Villa Aberdon." Now this penny I ask the favour of you to present from me to the Library of the Marischal college, in testimony of my having been some- time a student there. And I ask the same favour, Sir, with respect to this old draught of the two cities, and Ager Aberdonen. The au- thor of it is well known by his other performances of this same kind ; and as I never chanced to see another copy of this, and it has evidently been a copy that has been sent from Holland to receive the corrections of the author, which we discern upon it, all written with his own hand, he probably has chanced to die in the meantime, and so the design has not been followed forth, otherwise 'tis impossible but some copies would appear. But as none that I know of have been seen, this I hope will render it the more acceptable in the fore-mentioned repository. With my kind service to yourself and the gentlemen of the Marischal college, I remain, Dear Sir, your affectionate brother and humble Servant, ROBERT KEITH. Addressed, To the Right Rev. Mr Andrew Gerard, Aberdeen. SIR, I received your letter of the 18th, containing thanks from yourself and the society you represent for the silver coins, &c. deposited in your Marischal college by me LIFE OF BISHOP KEITH. and two of my brethren. As several of these coins are al- ready become, through length of time, exceeding rare, and seldom to be seen at all, and the rest will come to be so in a proportionable run of time, we thought it was doing some service to our native country to deposit those few in our Alma Mater, for the satisfaction of curious persons, after we shall be dead and gone ; and we are pleased enough that your society has put a mark of esteem on them, as to take all possible precaution to preserving them from being lost or dissipated. How coarsely soever our Scottish coins may appear to have been wrought, yet I think I can assure you that, by inspecting those of the neighbouring nations at the different periods, our own are not much in- ferior. I return you, Sir, my personal thanks for your polite letter, and for having been pleased to impart to me the al- teration you have already made in the fabric of the col- lege, which I remember very well how it formerly stood ; and the alteration you are intending to make in the future education of your students. I thank you also for a letter you gave me above a year and a half ago, to which I was diverted from giving a return at the time by some inci- dents ; and beg you will be so good as to receive this ex- cuse now, from, Sir, your most humble and obliged Servant, ROBERT KEITH. Addressed, To Principal ) T. Blackwell, Mar. Col. j &**?&> 9Sth Nov ' 1752 ' It has been already stated, that the Bishop passed several of the last years of his life at his villa of Bonnyhaugh, a retir- ed and pleasant situation on the banks of the Leith. There he enjoyed the society of his daughter's family, which was settled in that neighbourhood, diverted the langour of old age by study and religious meditation, and prepared his mind and his household for that important change, for which it had been the business of his life to prepare others. LIFE OF BJSIIOr KEITH. xliii He died at Bonny haugh on the 20th January 1757, between seven and eight o'clock in the morning, in the seventy-sixth year of his age. He was confined to bed only one day be- fore his death, the only day that he had been so confined during sixty-four years, though he had, as long as he lived in Edinburgh, been constantly afflicted with a nervous headache. He was buried in the Canongate church-yard, a few feet from the wall on the western side; and the spot where his remains were deposited has been recently distinguished by a plain tombstone, bearing only his name and the date of his decease, a tribute of affection paid by a distant relative, from pious respect to the memory of a good and learned man. May his merits be long cherished and his virtues imitated in this humble church ; and may his reputation for learning and patient enquiry stimulate others to follow his footsteps, in the search of truth and in the cultivation of sound and liberal science !* * Amidst the scarcity of biographical incident, of which the reader has had cause to complain, he may be surprised to meet with the following notice, which I find regularly recorded in. an authentic paper. " Bishop Keith, a married man, and having children, died worth only L.450 at the most ; and J.^M." (his colleague or assistant,) " a bachelor, died (proh dolor !) worth about L.3000 Sterling, and left not a farthing to the poor suffering clergy 1" PRELIMINARY DISSERTATION ON THE FIRST PLANTING OF CHRISTIANITY IN SCOTLAND, AXD OW THE HISTORY OF THE CULDEES. BY WALTER GOODALL, ESQ. IT is more than probable, that the Scots first learned the use of letters of those persons who introduced the Christian religion amongst them ; for it is certain enough, that very few, if any at all, among the northern nations, had the know- ledge of writings till they were either subdued by the Ro- mans or had the Gospel preached to them. And it may be reasonably supposed, that, for a good number of years after its first introduction, learning would make but a very slow progress in a corner of the world so remote as Scotland, and so ill provided with the means of attaining it ; especially while the inhabitants were in a perpetual state of war, either with the Romans, or their subjects, the Britons. It ought not, therefore, to seem strange, if the accounts that have been handed down to us, concerning the precise time when Christianity was first planted in this country, and of the per- sons by whose industry it was propagated, or of its progress in the infant state of the church with us, are found to be somewhat lame and obscure. The first preachers of the Gospel in the western church seem to have had more at heart the due instruction of their hearers, than the writing accounts of the success of their labours ; and it is not to be im- agined, that in those days there were many others to be found in this country who were sufficiently qualified for the task. xliv PRELIMINARY DISSERTATION It is said, in the Breviary of Aberdeen, That the two first preachers of Christianity to the Scots were called Mark and Denys, who converted a great number of them ; and the time when that happened is fixed to the year of the vul- gar Christian era 203, botlVby that Breviary and by Fordun, while, according to them, Victor I. was Pope of Borne, to whom, as Hector Boece writes, Donald king of Scots sent ambassadors,for obtaining proper persons tobesent to baptize himself and his household. But the silence of former writers on this head, leaves ground to suspect, that this is an addition made by Boece himself, to put the Scots on an equality with the Britons, who tell a similar story of an embassy sent to the Pope of Rome, by Lucius, one of their fictitious kings. Nor is either the Breviary or Fordun of sufficient authority to be entirely relied on in a matter of so great antiquity, espe- cially as they have taken up with an erroneous chronology, making Pope Victor to have been alive in the year 203, who had died seven years before. Nevertheless, that the Scots had embraced Christianity more early than was to have been expected, if we consider the northern situation of the country, and even sooner than is alleged by our historians, we learn by the testimony of a writer of greater authority, in that matter, than ah 1 our his- tories put together ; even that of Tertullian, who, in the se- venth chapter of his book against the Jews, which he is thought to have written before the end of the second cen- tury, expressly says, that the parts of Britain which had been inaccessible to the Romans were subdued to Christ, " Britamiorum inacessa Romanis loca, Christo vero subdita." 11 Tertullian, indeed, doth not name the Scots ; yea it doth not appear that our nation had as yet got that appellation Bnt he points them out with no less certainty, by condescen- ding expressly on the parts of Britain into which the Ro- mans had not penetrated, which were inhabited only by the Scots and Picts ; for it is well known, the Romans had sub- dued all the other inhabitants of Britain long before : And ON THE CULDEES. xlv the expression cannot be applied to the Picts, who still con- tinued in Paganism near two hundred years after Tertul- lian's days. See Bede's Eccl. Hist. III. 4. So it can be understood of none but the Scots. Whoever, therefore, con- siders that their conversion was so early, will have small rea- son to expect to find certain and particular accounts of it, as there are but few genuine writings, of that or any other kind, to be met with in the whole Latin church before die days of Tertullian. In like manner, although there are some accounts of the primitive state of Christianity among the Scots to be met with in modern compositions, yet, for a long time after this period, nothing particular is to be found on that subject among the ancients, on whose accounts only we can securely rely. But, in general, we are informed by St John Chry- sostome, in the twelfth chapter of his book against the Jews and Gentiles, which he wrote A. D. 386, that Christianity had been propagated in the island of Britain, and churches and altars erected there. And, before him, St Athanasius, in his Apology against the Arians, written about the year 350, tells us, that the bishops of Britain, amongst others, approved of the decree pronounced in his favours by the council of Sardica, A. D. 340. Hilary bishop of Poitiers, in the year 358, addresses his book " de Synodis" to the bishops of the provinces of Britain amongst others ; and Sulpitius Severus writes, that when the emperor had ap- pointed provisions and lodging to be furnished to upwards of four hundred bishops assembled at the council of Rimini, in the year 359, they reckoned that unbecoming, and chose rather to live at their own expense : Only three bishops, who came from Britain, and were indigent, refused a collec- tion which was offered them by the rest, judging that it was more eligible to be a burden on the public revenue than on private persons ; for which he commends them. And be- fore any of these, the Emperor Constantine the Great testifies, xlvi PRELIMINARY DISSERTATION that the feast of Easter was observed in Britain in a manner different from the Jewish custom. Although there is no mention made of the particular pla- ces of Britain in which these bishops did reside, yet these and other passages in ancient ecclesiastical writers, are suf- ficient to shew, that the faith, doctrine, and church govern- ment, and ecclesiastical rites, were the same in Britain as elsewhere; which indeed was naturally to have been presum- ed. And that the Britons and the Scots, together with the Picts and Irish, after these became converts, agreed entirely in all those things, is so often remarked by Bede, who was well acquainted with their affairs, that there is no room left either for denial or doubt. See his Hist. B. II. c. 4., III. 3. 4. 25., V. 15. 21. Prosper, in his Chronicle, writes, that in the consulate of Bassus and Antiochus, that is, in the year 431, Pope Celes- tine sent Palladius to the Scots then believing in Christ, to be their chief bishop ; for so are his words " primus Episco- pus," to be interpreted. For the Popes of Rome, when they sent bishops to places where Christianity had been already planted, were in use, by their patriarchal power, to give them a superiority over the other bishops of that country. Thus Pope Gregory sending Augustine, the monk, to Eng- land, gave him authority over all the bishops of Britain. But the ambiguity of the word " primus? which signifies first in time as well as first in dignity or order, misled For- dun and some others, who took it in the former sense. But his continuator understood it rightly, and applied the term to the bishops of St Andrews. He says, ' Quilibet eorum, ' qui pro tempore fuerat, non tanquam primas, sed primus 4 et praecipuus in regno habebatur."* While most nations round about had their archbishops and primates, there was none among the Scots who had either of these titles, till towards the end of the fifteenth century : But the bishop of St Andrews was designed either " primus/' 1 or " summus Episcopus," or simply " Episcopus ON THE CULDEES. Scotorum," as is to be seen in the charters and seals still extant. And one Nicholaus, an Englishman, in his epistle to Eadmerus, tells, that the bishop of St Andrews was called " summus Pontifex Scotorum ;" and from that argues in these words : ' Summus vero non est, nisi qui super alios * est : qui autem super alios Episcopos est, quid nisi Archi- * episcopus est?' Anglia Sacra, Vol. II. p. 235. And that there was a bishop in Scotland, who had the same designation before the regular erection of the see of St Andrews, and even while that see was yet a part of the Pictish kingdom, is pretty evident from this, that, among those who subscribe the decrees of a council held at Rome in the year 721, one designs himself " Fergustus Scotia? episcopus, Pictus." Archbishop Usher, and his epitomiser, Dr Lloyd, bishop of St Asaph, will have Prosper to be otherwise understood, because, in his book, Contra Collatorem, he says, that Pope Celestine ' having ordained a bishop for the Scots, while he * endeavoured to keep the Roman island Catholic, he also * made the barbarous island Christian/ Upon which they observe, That as Prosper speaks of two distinct islands, the Roman island, and the barbarous island, by the former he certainly means Britain, and by the other he must mean Ireland ; and therefore that Palladius' mission was to that country, and not to Scotland. And this interpretation they endeavour to establish from Gildas, who calls Britain Ro- mania, says that it bore the Roman name, and speaks of Ireland under the name of Barbaria, or the barbarous island. But they are very unlucky in this observation ; for it is plainly the Roman province in Britain, exclusive of the rest of the island, that is called Romania by Gildas, and the re- maining part he calls Barbaria ; which is most evident from his calling it the country of the Scots and Picts, both which people he calls Gentes aquilonales, northern nations, telling us that the Scots came to invade the Roman pro- * d Xlviii PRELIMINARY DISSERTATION vince a circio, from the north, and the Picts ab aquilone, from north north-east, which expressions are by no means applicable to Ireland. It is true they assert, that the word circius is to be interpreted the west, because it was abso- lutely necessary for their purpose that it should be so. But no writers, excepting English and Irishmen, ever used it ' in that sense ; and that Gil das meant not the west by it, is undeniably clear, from the first sentence of his book, where he says, that Britain is situate almost in the remotest part of the world, toward the circius and occidens, that is, the north and west : for as occldens, without all peradventure, is the west, circius must as certainly mean the north ; be- cause, to apply it to any other quarter of the heavens would make no manner of sense at all. Nor will it avail them, that Gildas speaks of the Roman province as an island by itself, and calls the Scots a trans- marine nation; for he says the very same thing of the Picts : but none will infer from thence, that the Picts did not dwell in Britain. Why, then, should that expression conclude against the Scots, who were found in Britain long before that time, where they still remain ? He says that the Romans caused build a wall between the two seas beyond his island, (trans insulam,) to keep out the Scots and the Picts. Now this wall is to be seen at this day, and shews where his island did terminate. Some may indeed think it strange that Prosper and Gil- das should write of Britain as consisting of two islands, one belonging to the Romans and another to the barbarians ; but to those who duly inquire into the notions which the ancients entertained concerning the geography of Britain, this will seem no matter of wonder. The more ancient writers held, as we do, that there were two large islands, situated at a small distance from one an- other, towards the north from Gaul, the one called Britan- nia and the other Hibernia, or lerne ; and yet, as to the situation of these two islands with regard to one another, ON THE CULDEES. the ancients and moderns differ widely. The Hibernia of the more ancient writers lay to the north of Britain, but that of the modern lies on the west side of the more south- ern part of Britain. Strabo gives the dimensions of Britain according to the ancients, which was about 545 Roman miles from east to west, which manifestly comprehends Ireland. But from south to north, according to them, it extended only 463 Roman miles, and therefore excluded all Scotland on the north side of the Frith of Forth, which they imagined to be a separate island, and called it by the name of Hiber- nia, or lerne ; and this continued to be the general notion among both Greek and Roman writers, till Julius Agricola first forced his way into Galloway, from whence he got a view of Ireland, and after that advanced to the Grampian hills on the north side of Forth, and saw with his eyes, that what had been formerly thought to be an island was only a peninsula, and, by sailing round Britain, discovered the mistakes concerning these islands. Yet, after all these mistakes were thus rectified, not only Prosper and Gildas, but divers other writers both before and after them, persisted to represent the Roman province in Britain as one island by itself, which they called Britan- nia, and the northern part of Britain as another island, which they sometimes call Hibernia, as may be seen at greater length in the Introduction to the History of Scotland prefixed to the edition of Fordun's History printed at Edin- burgh. The early conversioii of the Scots to Christianity is fur- ther instructed from their pertinacious adherence to the more ancient customs of the Latin church, such as their method of observing Easter by a cycle of 84 years, and an old form of tonsure, which they continued to use for 250 years and upwards, after a change in rituals and ceremonies had been introduced among the greatest part of the Western church. d 1 PRELIMINARY DISSERTATION But some later writers have founded quite different opi- nions on these very matters, and infer very positively, that the conversion of the Scots could not have been brought about by means of any persons belonging to the Roman church, but by some who had been of the Asiatic churches ; which fancy seems to have been first broached by John Bale, an English writer since the Reformation, and then adopted by George Buchanan, and afterwards improved by others ; so that now we are told, ' that the Scots of old * differed exceedingly from the Roman church, both in * doctrine, discipline, and church government ; that before * the middle of the tenth century they had no bishops, but ' that their church was governed by presbyters and reli- c gious monks called Culdees, who were no friends to bi- * shops, and kept themselves pure from all innovations and * corruptions of the church of Rome : that it appears by ' writings still extant, that there were colleges or convents * of these Culdees at St Andrews, Abernethy, Dunkeld, * Dumblane, Brechin, Lochleven, Monymusk, and else- * where throughout the kingdom, who were at perpetual * variance with the Romish clergy ; and, therefore, the ' churchmen presently established amongst us are the only 1 right and lawful successors of these ancient Culdees, and * thus have the sole right to possess all churches, church- ' lands, and benefices, because they were the restorers of the < Christian religion as anciently professed in this kingdom : * for that bishops among us were only innovators, schis- ' matics, and intruders ; on Avhich account they were justly 4 pillaged and set aside at the time of the Reformation, ' deposed at the beginning of the grand rebellion, and ' abolished, as far as acts of Parliament can go, at the Re- ' volution.' Thus every sect puts in a claim to antiquity. But if inquiry be made upon what foundation all these things are asserted, there will nothing be found but igno- rance or fable. For, first, it is a strange inference, that because the Scots in old times observed the feast of Easter ON THE CULDEES. 11 by another cycle than that which the church of Rome had adopted, therefore they entertained the same opinions with the modern Presbyterians, who utterly condemn any cele- bration of that festival as highly superstitious; for al- though they found out the day by a different cycle, they celebrated the festival with the same care and solemnity as the others. Nor did they at all agree with the ancient Asiatics, who, it is certain, held it always on the fourteenth day of the moon, the very day of the Jewish Passover, on whatever day of the week it fell ; whereas the Scots and Britons always solemnized it on a Sunday from the four- teenth to the twentieth day of the moon inclusive, by a cycle of 84 years ; which cycle, as we learn from Epipha- nius, was originally Jewish, and had been adopted by the church of Rome, and applied to the Christian scheme ; in which church it was retained as the rule for finding Easter- day, till after the middle of the fifth century that Victo- rius of Aquitain drew up a cycle of 532 years, as is evident from his Prologue, and from the Epistles of Ambrose, Pas- chasinus, Cyril, Pope Leo, and others, published by Bu- eherius. But, before this, the construction of the cycle of 84 years had been oftener than once varied by the church of Rome ; for in the earliest times they fixed the equinox to the 25th of March, called Julius Caesar's equinox, which they did never anticipate, unless when they were laid under a neces- sity by the straitness of their Pascal month, which they chose to confine between the 25th of March and the 21st of April inclusive, within which limits the cycle was so con- trived as to point out for Easter-day the Sunday that hap- pened from the 14th to the 20th day of the moon. It was this most ancient form of that cycle to which the Scots and Britons adhered ; and that it had been used by the church of Rome before the Council of Nice is pretty plain from the Pascal table for 100 years, published by Bu- cherius in his Doctrina Temporum, and by Eccardus Hi PRELIMINARY DISSERTATION among his Writers of the Middle Age ; for, in the former part of that table, Easter-day will be found on the 14th day of the moon in the years 316 and 320. Sometime after the Council of Nice, the Roman church made a great change in the cycle. The equinox, which was found to be too late, they retracted from the 25th to the 21st of March, and enlarged their Pascal month, that is, the limits of their Easter Sundays, from the 21st of March to the 21st of April ; and, as to the moon's age, in- stead of celebrating, as formerly, from the 14th to the 20th day, they extended it, admitting only the 16th day for the first limit and the 22d for the last, which made a very dif- ferent cycle. Lastly, Soon after Palladius was sent to Scotland, Pros- per of Aquitain reformed the cycle again, but without any further variation than that, whereas formerly there had been a saltus lunae admitted at the end of every 12th year, he admitted it only every 14th year, that is, he computed the epact of the 14th year to be 12 instead of 11, which made sometimes a considerable difference. And this form of the cycle was still in use in the church of Rome under Pope Leo, tih 1 the year 457. Hence it seems sufficiently clear that the Scots must have received their cycle in its first state from the Roman church and not from Asiatics, because the method of their cycle was the very same with that of the Roman church before the Nicene Council ; and this points out their early conver- sion with more certainty than the testimony of any histo- torian who wrote either 1000 or 1200 years ago could convey, and shews that the notion of a conversion by Asiatics is not only quite imaginary, but a great mistake ; for the Scots rule for Easter differed more from theirs than ever it did from the Roman method. II. As to the Culdees, it is very certain that there was a sort of monks, and secular priests too, who went under that ON THE CULDEES. liii appellation, not only among the Scots, but also among the Britons and Irish, and even among the northern English, who were first converted by the Scots, particularly in the cathedral of York, [Monast. Anglican. Tom. II. p. 367, 368.] The convents of these Culdees, or Keldees, consti- tuted the chapter, and had the election of the bishops in the several places where bishops were established. At St Andrews, our metropolitan see, they continued to elect the bishops, till, in the year 1140, a priory was erected there, and filled with canons-regular, who after that seem to have joined with the Culdees in the following elections of bishops, until the year 1273, although they had not lived peaceably together all that time ; but from thenceforth the canons justled the Culdees entirely out of their right, and they ne- glected to make any appeal till the year 1297, and then they sent their provost or prior, William Gumming, to plead their cause at Rome before Pope Boniface VIII. where they lost their plea, non utendojure suo, because they had suffered two former elections to proceed without them, and entered their appeal only against the third. The chapters of the other bishoprics consisted of Culdees, in the same manner as that of St Andrews ; particularly at Dunkeld, Dumblane, and Brechin, there had been convents of Culdees very anciently, and amongst them the bishops had their residence before the dotation of the ancient bi- shoprics, or the erection of the new ones by King Da- vid I. Alexander Miln, abbot of Cambuskenneth, and first Lord President of the Court of Session, wrote an Account of the Bishops of Dunkeld, while he was yet a canon there ; in the beginning of which he affirms, < that about the year * 1127, King David I. converted the monastery that had * been founded by Constantine, king of the Picts, into a ' cathedral, and having cast out the Culdees, he instituted ' a bishop and canons ; that the first bishop was Gregory, * who had been abbot of the monastery at that time, and liv PRELIMINARY DISSERTATION * afterwards was one of the king's council, and that he * died in the year 1173, after he had been bishop forty-two ' years.' Which narrative is little else than a concatenation of mistakes ; for before Gregory, Cormac was bishop of Dun- keld, in the days of King Alexander I. to whose foundation- charter to the canons of Scone he and Gregory, bishop of Moray, are the first witnesses, in the year 1115 ; and the / 7 J same two bishops, together with Robert elect of St An- drews, do attest another charter by King Alexander I. to that abbey, which must have been granted A. D. 1124, for in that year Bishop Robert was elected, and the king died. After this, the same Bishop Cormac subscribes as witness to two charters of King David's donations to the monastery of Dunfermline, with Robert bishop of St Andrews, (who could not use that designation before his consecration in the year 1128,) and with Herbert, who was chancellor in the last years of King Alexander and beginning of King David's reign, while the Culdees were yet the chapter of his see, by whom both he and his predecessors had been elected, in the same manner as was observed at St Andrews ; for it cannot be instructed how many predecessors in office he had. All that can be said is, that we are sure there were bishops there as far back as we find charters extant, and in the time of the Culdees. Therefore there is no ground to doubt that they had been there from the very foundation of the place in the days of the Picts. After Cormac, Bishop Gregory is frequently to be met with, attesting charters of King David, and of King Mal- colm his grandson, together with Robert bishop of St An- drews, and Herbert and Arnold bishops of Glasgow, that is, between the years 1147 and 1162. He died A. D. 1169, as both the chronicle of Melrose and Fordun do relate ; from all which it is evident, that Abbot Miln was far mis- taken when he took him for the first bishop of Dunkeld, and also as to the time of his promotion and of his death. ON THE CULDEES. Iv But if canons-regular were brought there in Gregory's days, or about the time that they had their first settlement in St Andrews, which is highly probable, it may be thought that he proposed only to begin his account at that period of time, and to neglect 'all preceding bishops, as in his opi- nion uncanonical. All that hath been said here is founded on charters, to be seen in the chartularies of Scone and Dun- fermline ; and people who have not access to these may find their authorities quoted, concerning the very same things, in Sir James Dalrymple's Collections, by comparing the pages 240, 388, 389, and 402, among themselves. But they ought not to be surprised if they find some strange things inferred from thence, or asserted by that writer, such as his translating Bishop Cormac from Murtlach to Dunkeld, and this Gregory from being abbot of Dunkeld to be bishop of Moray, and from thence back again from Moray to Dunkeld, p. 245, not only without any show of authority, but even in spite of chronology ; or his argu- ment, p. 246, that because one of King David's charters is attested by five bishops, therefore there were only five bi- shops in Scotland at that time ; and all this for fear that the kingdom should be found too well stocked with bishops. At Dumblane the Culdees continued near a hundred years longer than at Dunkeld. Cormac Malpol, their prior, with Michael parson of Mothil, and Macbeath his chaplain, are witnesses to a confirmation by William bishop of Dumblane, of a gift of the church of Kincardine to the monks of Cambuskenneth, to be seen in their chartu- lary, fol. 80 ; and Malpol the prior, and Michael and Mal- colm, Culdees, are witnesses to a charter by Simon bishop of Dumblane, one of William's predecessors. See Craw- ford's Officers of 'State ', p. 6. At last, in the year 1 240, the election of the bishops of that see was devolved upon canons-regular, by a mandate of Pope Gregory IX. which was obtained in this manner : Ivi PRELIMINARY DISSERTATION Clement bishop of Dumblane went to Rome, and repre- sented to that Pope, how of old time his bishopric had been vacant upwards of a hundred years, during which period almost all the revenues were seized by the seculars ; and although, in process of time, there had been several bishops instituted, yet, by their simplicity or negligence, the former dilapidations were not recovered, but, on the contrary, the remainder was almost quite alienated ; so that, for near ten years, a proper person could not be found to accept of the charge; that the case having been laid before the Pope, he had committed the trust of supplying that va- cancy to the bishops of St Andrews, Dunkeld, and Brechin, who made choice of this Clement ; but he found his church so desolate that he had not where to lay his head in his cathedral : there was no college there, only a rural chap- lain performed divine service in the church that had its roof uncovered ; and the revenues of the see were so small that they could hardly afford him maintenance for one-half of the year. To remedy these evils, the Pope appointed William and Geoffry, the bishops of Glasgow and Dunkeld, to visit the church of Dumblane ; and, if they should find these things to be as represented, he authorised them to cause the fourth part of the tythes of all the parish-churches within that diocy to be assigned to the bishop thereof; who, after re- serving out of these tithes so much as should be proper for his own sustenance, was, by the advice of these two bishops, and other expert persons, to assign the rest to a dean and canons, whom the Pope enjoined to be settled there, if these matters could be brought about without great offence ; or, if otherwise, he ordered that the fourth of the tithes of all such churches of the diocy as were in the hands of seculars should be assigned to the bishop, and that the bishop's seat should be translated to St John's monastery of canons-re- gular within that diocy, and appointed that these canons ON THE CULDEES. Ivii should have the election of the bishop when a vacancy should happen thereafter. But the seculars were not the only persons who had got the revenues in their possession ; for some regulars had got a good share, who were not so easily to be divested. From this narrative it appears, that Dumblane had been a bishop's seat in very ancient times. The long vacancy that happened in it, of more than a hundred years, must have been before the days of King David I. who again re- stored this see ; for from his time the succession of its bi- shops is to be found pretty fully and well vouched by suffi- cient documents yet extant. At Brechin the Culdees continued yet much longer to be the dean and chapter. Bricius their prior is a witness to some of TurpuVs charters ; and after him Prior Mallebride attests divers charters by the Bishops Turpin, Ralph, Hugh, and Gregory. The designation given him by the bishops is " Prior Kaledeorum nostrorum," prior of our Culdees, or prior of Brechin ; and sometimes only prior. The Culdees, like other chapters of Episcopal sees, gave confirmations of charters granted by their bishops, some of which are still extant, although rarely to be met with, be- cause the records of all our bishoprics, three only except- ed, seem to have been destroyed by our reformers. It, therefore, may not be improper to exhibit two of them, that if there be any who incline to discredit, or call in question what is here asserted, they may be induced to be- lieve by the authority of the Culdees themselves. Confirmatio Capituli Brecliynensis de Procurationibus. 1 UNIVEBSIS sanctse matris ecclesiae filiis, Mallebryde, prior et Keledei, ceterique de Capitulo Brechynensis ecclesiae, salutem. Sit universitati vestrae notum, Ra- dulphum Dei gratia Brechynensem episcopum, consilio Iviii PRELIMINARY DISSERTATION ' nostro et assensu. monachis de Abirbrothoc, caritatis * intuitu, concessisse, ut, quandocunque ad quasdam eccle- * sias eoruni, in dioecesi ejus sitas, visitandas ex officio ve- * nerit, videlicet ad ecclesiam de Marigtoun, vel ad eccle- * siam de Gutheryn, vcl ad ecclesiam de Panbryd, vel ad * ecclesiam de Moniekyn, vel ad ecclesiam de Dunechtyn, * ad nullam earum hospitalitatis ei exhibeatur procuratio ; * sed tantum ad abbatiam, ubi hoc honestius et decentius * fieri potest. Nos etiam concessionem istam, sicut in carta * praedictorum monachorum melius continetur, omnino ra- 1 tarn et gratam habemus : et, in hujus rei testimonium, 4 praesenti scripto ecclesiae nostrae sigillum dignum duximus ' apponendum. Teste Capituli nostri universitate. Confirmatio Capituli Brecliynensis de omnibus ecdeslls. ' UNIVERSIS sanctae matris ecclesiae filiis Mallebryde, ' prior et Keledei, ceterique clerici de Capitulo Brechy- * nensis ecclesise, salutem. Universitati vestrae notum ' facimus, nos donationes et concessiones ecclesiarum Deo ' et monasterio beati Thomas martyris de Abirbrothoc, et * monachis ibidem Deo servientibus et servituris, a felicis * memoriae Turpino et Radulpho Brechynensis ecclesia? * Episcopis canonice collatas, ratas et gratas habere ; et * eisdem donationibus et concessionibus, sicut in eorum car- ' tis liberius, quietius, plenius et honorificentius continentur, 4 consilium praebere et assensum : Et in hujus rei testimo- * nium, praesenti scripto sigillum ecclesise nostne dignum * duximus apponendum. Testibus G. Archidiacono, Hu- * gone de Sigillo, Matthaeo Decano, Andrea Capellano, * Petro Capellano Ranulpho Capellano de Maringtoun, * Ada Blundo, et Roberto clerico filio Adas Senescalli." That the monastery of Brechin, in which the bishop had his residence, was very ancient, may be well inferred from the end of a brief chronicle of twelve of our king?, from ON THE CULDKKS. lix Kenneth Macalpin, published by Mr Innes, with his Cri- tical Essay, 788. III. Whereas it hath been alleged and maintained, that the disputes which the Culdees had with some bishops and canons were on account of differences about religious ten- ets, it will appear, by examining into the instances alleged, that it was not so, but merely such disputes as the bishops and canons had pretty frequently among themselves, about money, lands, and privileges. Thus the determination of the controversy betwixt Wil- liam bishop of St Andrews and the Culdees of Monimusk, doth not in the least * make it appear that the exercise of * their religion, and of their society, churchmen, and laics, 4 was different from the Romish,' S. I. D. p. 382. For, first, As to laics, it will be a novelty, when it is shewed that ever any of them was called a Culdee ; and as to the rest of the story all would have appeared quite contrary, if the assertor had thought fit to give a fair account of the contents of that paper. For, 1. In the copy of the very same paper, as it stands in the chartulary of the bishopric of Aberdeen, there is not one syllable of the first article of that agreement which is given us by Sir James Dalrymple, p. 281, to wit, * That * the Culdees of Monimusk should live in communion, 4 after the manner of Culdees.' 2. The chartulary has a notable piece of a sentence, which Sir James has not given us ; for, in the article about the election of the prior when a vacancy happened, ' the 4 Culdees were to elect three of their fellow Culdees, by 4 common consent, and present them to the bishop, or his ' successor, who was to make choice of one of the three, at ' his will and pleasure, and that person was to swear fealty 4 to the bishop," 1 [here Sir James stops, but the chartu- lary proceeds,] ' as Founder of the Culdees* House? So it is plain, the bishops founded the convents of Culdees, and the Culdees elected the bishops, whenever they re- Ix sided about the bishop's see, although not at places like Mo- nimusk, where there was no bishop. 3. Sir James has forgotten to give the main foundation of this controversy, which was, that these Culdees would needs be canons-regular, and would erect themselves into a canonry, not only without the consent but even against the declared will of the bishop, their patron and founder. So far were they from being at variance with the canons in points of religion, that they themselves would needs be ca- nons-regular. Another cause of quarrel was, that it seems, by a pre- tended gift from the Earl of Mar, they had possessed them- selves of some lands that belonged to the bishop without his consent, and, by this deed of agreement, bound them- selves not to do the like afterwards, either by that earl's or any other man's gift. 4. It doth not appear that the Bishop did, by this deed, restrict their number any further than it had stood restricted formerly, whatever reason Sir James may have had for thinking so, p. 282. It was allowed that there should be twelve of them, besides their prior ; which number might be thought sufficient at Monimusk, seeing the same num- ber served at St Andrews ; for that there \vere precisely thirteen at that place also, we learn from these words in the excerpts from the Register of St Andrews itself: ' Habe- ' bantur tamen in ecclesia Sancti Andreas, quanta et qualis ' ipsa tune erat, tredecim per successionem carnalem, quos i Keledeos appellant.' Sir James understands by these words, that there had been thirteen successions of Culdees at St Andrews before King David's days, of which, says he, the meaning is obscure. Very obscure, truly, to make thirteen successions of a whole community, out of so many persons only at one time ! The meaning of the words, " per successionem carnalem," that there were thirteen of them by carnal succession, is not so very obvious, nor so generally understood. It seems ON THE CULDEES. Ixi that, as the secular Culdecs had wives, they were succeeded by their sons, by which means a perpetual generation of he- reditary Culdees was kept up. It is thought that the words above cited will admit of no other meaning. Abbot Miln tells us, " that the Culdees had wives, after the fashion of the Eastern church," as he says ; but in this he is mistaken : And although that custom had gone much into desuetude for about three hundred years before his time, yet it was not altogether abolished, for there were several instances of it to be found at the time of the Refor- mation. Our interpretation, therefore, of the words above cited, is well supported, by shewing that this was no singu- larity or novelty, but was the practice in other countries, before the full establishment of canons-regular in the ele- venth century. Hildebert, archbishop of Tours, writes, Epist. 55. That while he was bishop of Man, the canonries or prebends of the church of Clermont were transmitted hereditarily, so that there the canons were born such, and not instituted : and for this they pleaded custom in their favour, alleging that there was no need of electing any clergy excepting bi- shops, and perhaps abbots. Also from his 65th Letter, and the answer to it by Pope Honorius, it appears that the same custom prevailed in Bretagne, till it was abolished by Hildebert, in his provincial or metropolitical council, A. D. 1127. The sameness of the custom in Scotland and Bretagne is readily accounted for ; because the people of that country had been taught the Christian religion by the Scots, and re- tained their other customs, more ancient than this, above 100 years after they had been given up by the Scots them- selves, to wit, until the year 818. For then the Emperor Lewis, called the Pious, having subdued Morrnan, who had assumed the sovereignty of Bretagne, he called before him Marmonnoc, abbot of Landvenec, and interrogated him concerning these rites, who answered, " That they had still Ixii PRELIMINARY DISSERTATION hitherto strictly observed what they had received from th Scots as to these matters." Upon which the emperor pub- lished an edict, that the rites then used by the church of Rome should from thenceforth be practised, not only in that monastery, but throughout that whole province. The practice of transmitting benefices by inheritance, continued longer in Yv r ales than in any of the countries hi- therto mentioned, as Giraldus Cambrensis informs us, in his Illauddbil'ibus Wall'ice, cap. 6. ' Successive quoque, et * post patres filii ecclesias obtinent, non elective ; heredita- * rie possidentes et polluentes ecclesiam Dei : The sons get the churches, after their fathers, by succession, and not by election ; possessing and polluting the church of God by inheritance. The same author also informs us, that in his days, that is, in the end of the 12th or beginning of the 13th century, there was a kind of religious persons called Culdees, in di- vers places of Wales and Ireland, Itin. Cambr. 11. 6. et Topogra. Hib. c. 4. And, by all accounts that have been brought to light concerning them, it is certain enough that, of old amongst us, wherever there was a bishop's seat, they were instead of the dean and chapter. And therefore it is almost absurd to imagine, that they were of one religion and their bishops of another ; yea, they differed no more in religion from the rest of the church of Rome than Black Friars do from White. Some of them, after the Monkish way, professed celibacy ; of which sort those at Monimusk, and the like places, seem to have been ; but the far greater part, and particularly such as constituted the bishop's chap- ter, were seculars, and mostly married, whose sons succeed- ed them in their benefices, according to a practice which then obtained in other nations. IV. To proceed with the disputes betwixt them and their neighbours. The next appealed to, (Ibid, p. 282,) is a controversy in which the Culdees had no great concern. ON THE CDLDEES. King David I. had granted to the monks of Dunfermline the lands of Balchristin, reserving to the Culdees a right which they had to a pension out of these lands. This right came afterwards to belong to the canons of St Andrews, either by purchase, exchange, or donation ; but the avari- cious monks of Dunfermline would keep all to themselves. The plea was brought before King William, whose deci- sion was, that the monks should have the lands, reserving to the canons the pension which the Culdees had out of these lands in the reign of King David ; which is appa- rently a very equitable sentence, and leaves no ground for a reflection so injurious to King William's memory, as to as- sert, "thatno right of the Culdees was favourable at that time, albeit it was pled by the canons-regular of St Andrews." V. The prior and Culdees of Abernethy had a plea with the abbot and monks of Aberbrothoc, about the tithes of some lands within the parish of Abernethy ; which was carried on for a long time, both before King William's court, and also in the ecclesiastical court before Abraham bishop of Dunblane. At last, after strict examination, and by advice of lawyers, the bishop gave final sentence against the prior and Culdees, in presence of Bricius, King Wil- liam's chief-justice, and many others : in which sentence both parties agreed to acquiesce, and swore to the perpetual observance thereof in all time coming, as may be seen in the chartulary of Aberbrothoc, fol. 105, 106. Who would ever have expected to hear these pleas, a- bout church-lands and tithes, insisted on as evidences that the parties were of different sentiments in religion, when there is not one word about religion in them ! Surely the debate, whether the Culdees at Monimusk could transform themselves into canons-regular, contrary to the will of the bishop of St. Andrews, their patron and founder, is so far from supporting any insinuation of their differing in reli- gion from the church of Rome, that it supposeth the very PRELIMINARY DISSERTATION contrary ; as the contest betwixt the Culdees and canons of St. Andrews also doth most manifestly, and to such a de- gree, that to those who are not sufficiently acquainted with the usual methods by which controversies of this kind have been carried on amongst us for about these 200 years by- past, it must be astonishing to hear such notions invented, propagated, and maintained from topics which so evidently refute them, by any person who regards his own character. There is an original paper extant, relating to another de- bate betwixt the Culdees and canons of St Andrews, in which it is alleged, that notice is taken of a diversity in their religion. The controversy was this : The prior and convent of St Andrews claimed the precedency and superiority in the direction and management of affairs in St Mary's church of St Andrews, which the Culdees would not allow ; for they maintained, and with a good deal of reason too, that Mr Adam Malkirwistun, their prior, was provost of St Mary's church, and that they themselves were the canons. The matter was appealed to the Pope of Rome, and he de- legated the priors of St Oswald and Kyrkham in England, (who, being of another kingdom, it was to be supposed would deal the more impartially,) to inquire into the matter, and to determine according to justice. The delegates found the Culdees in the wrong, and in the mean time suspended them from their office; but delayed to pronounce their final sentence, which they appointed to be done by Robert, abbot of Dunfermline, one of the Pope's chaplains and chancellor of Scotland, and the treasurer of Dunkeld, upon the 7th November 1250 ; whom they ordained to inquire also, whether these Culdees, and their vicars, had in the mean time celebrated divine ordinances while they were thus under ecclesiastical censure : " Et ad inquirendum, utrum divina celebraverint sic ligati." The Culdees did not make their appearance at the day appointed ; yet, not- withstanding their contumacy, the delegates mildly enough delayed the publication of the sentence till another time. ON THE CULDEES. IxV But some people have affixed a very different meaning to the few Latin words now cited ; as if < the chancellor and * treasurer had been appointed to inquire how the Culdees * and their vicars did celebrate divine ordinances ;' and thence an observation has been made, (Ibid, p. 284,) * that ' they did not rightly perform their worship ;' as if the word utrum were to be interpreted how or after -what man- ner ; whereas the plain meaning of the sentence is, * that ' they were to make inquiry whether these Culdees had 4 sung or said mass while they were not at liberty, sic li- 1 gati, as lying under ecclesiastical censure.' Besides the numerous mistakes which have of late been promulgated concerning the Culdees, there is a second branch of the same controversy, which must not be quite overlooked in this place, although it has as bad, or rather a worse foundation than the other. It is boldly asserted, that as ( there were no bishops in the Primitive church, the * Scots admitted none amongst them, till, in the reign of In- * dulfus, after the middle of the tenth century, Fothad be- 1 came the first bishop of St Andrews ; for though Kellach * is said by some to have been the first bishop there, it is a ' mistake, seeing both Fordun and Winton name Fothad 4 as the first, although, being inconsistent with themselves, * they make Kellach contemporary with King Gregory. c That their mistake is plain from Fothad's own inscription ' upon a fine case which he caused make for the copy of 4 the Gospels in .his cathedral. " Hanc evangeliam thecam construxit aviti Fothad, qui Scotis primus episcopus est." Further, it is observed, p. 65, * that the Scots had an * unusual form of church government, and entirely different * from that of the Saxons, who were disciples of the Roman * church ; for Bede writes, that the abbot of the monastery * of Hyi was always a priest, who had not only jurisdiction * over the whole province, but also, by an unusual custom, 4 was superior to the bishops themselves.' . PRELIMINARY DISSERTATION. It would be a very unnecessary employment to set about proving that there were bishops in the Primitive church, because every one, who has the least acquaintance with the ecclesiastical writers, knows as certainly that they had bi- shops as that they had churches. As to the Scots, Palla- ladius was sent to be their bishop in the "year 431, which shews that they had bishops before him. Bede gives us a letter from Laurence, archbishop of Canterbury, directed to the bishops and abbots throughout all Scotland, in the year 604, Hist. II. 4. In the year 635, Oswald, king of Northumberland, who had been educated and baptized during his exile among the Scots, sent to them for a bishop to instruct his subjects ; and they made choice of Aidan, a monk of Hyi, whom they found worthy to be a bishop, (' dignum episcopatu decernunt, sicque ilium ordinantes, ' ad predicandum miserunt. Missus est ^Edan, accepto * gradu episcopatus.' Bed. Hist. III. 5.) and therefore ordained and sent him. After his death, the Scots ordained and sent Finan to be his successor. (* Finan pro illo gra- ' dum episcopatus, a Scotis ordinatus ac missus, acceperat."* Ibid. III. 25.) And Finan was succeeded by Colman, who was also sent by the Scots. The conversion of the kingdoms of Mercia, the Middle Angles, and East Saxons, was brought about by means of Finan, who ordained one priest, his countryman, called Diuma, to be bishop of the two former kingdoms, and another called Cedd for the lat- ter; at whose ordination, it is remarked, he called other two bishops to assist. Hence it is manifest, that more of the English were instructed in Christianity by the Scots than by Augustine the monk, and the other missionaries from Rome, and had bishops and priests sent them from Scotland time after time ; and therefore it was not to have been expected that the English would, once and again, have concurred so heartily with those who wanted to abo- lish the Episcopal order in Scotland, while they still kept it up among themselves. ON THE CULDEES. Bede hath preserved to us a letter from Pope John in the year 640, directed to five Scottish bishops and six pres- byters, by name, and one of these Segenus abbot of Hii, about the observation of Easter, and about Pelagianism. Hist. II. 19. We find two bishops from Britain subscribing the acts of a council held at Rome in the year 721, the one called Sedulius, a Scot, and the other Fergustus, a Pict, who takes the designation of " Scotiae episcopus," bishop of Scotland, and therefore seems to have been the chief bishop of our country at that time, as has been hinted already, p. 4. VII. As to the bishops of St Andrews, Sir James Dal- rymple has mistaken when he writes, (p. 12(5,) that For- dun and Winton name Fothad for the first of them ; for both of them write of Bishop Kellach as before him ; as also did Abbot Bowmaker, in his lives of the bishops of that see, although some copies of that book now have it that Fothad was the first ; (" Primus, ut reperi, fuit Fothad ;") which is a vitiation, owing to the ignorance of some tran- scriber^ who mistook the meaning of the word primus in Bishop Fothad's inscription, and imagined that it signified first in time, whereas it really is designed for first in dig- nity, as is plain from other copies, in which Kellach is put long before him in time ; and the context leaves no room to doubt, that Bowmaker himself meant it so ; for he tells us, that he gives an account of the bishops of St Andrews faom the time of Kenneth Macalpin ; yet he places Fothad in the reign of Indulfus, which is a hundred years after Kenneth Macalpin ; whereas Kellach is made contempo- rary with King Gregory, who began to reign within 20 or 22jyears after King Kenneth ; and we find Kellach holding a general council with King Constantine about the year 906, (Innes's Crlt. Essay, p. 785,) long before the days of Indulfus and Fothad. This confirms much what has been said already of Palladius, that he was the chief, not the PRELIMINARY DISSERTATION first bishop of the Scots ; and had our historians understood the word primus, when spoken of Palladius, in the same sense in which they certainly applied it to Fothad, and in which Fothad himself, and others, both at home and abroad, did use it, they would have thereby prevented much error and wrangling. VIII. Bede says, indeed, that the abbot of Hii, who was no more than a priest, had not only jurisdiction over the whole province, but also, by an unusual custom, over the bishops themselves. But surely he could not mean that this jurisdiction was in spirituals ; for of the contrary we are informed by Adamnanus, who himself was abbot of Hii, and tells us of Columba, the first abbot, that having once called up a bishop, whom he at first took to be only a priest, to assist him at the consecration of the Eucharist, upon discovering his character, he desired him to make use of the privilege of his order, in breaking the bread alone. " We now know, (says Columba,) that you are a bishop, why then have ye hitherto endeavoured to conceal yourself, and hindered us from treating you with due respect and veneration ?" The superiority, therefore, of which Bede speaks, must have been of another sort, and what that was may be learn- ed from himself; for, in his Life of St Cuthbert, he explains this custom of the Scots bishops, viz. that the bishop, and other monks, made choice of the abbot, who took on him the sole government of the monastery ; and that all the priests, deacons, singers, readers, and others of the eccle- siastic order, together with the bishop himself, observed the monastic rule in all things. * Regente monasterium Abbate, * quern ipsi Episcopi, cum consilio fratrum, elegerint, omnes 4 Presbyteri, Diaconi, Cantores, Lectores, ceterique gra - as * ecclesiastic!, monachicam per omnia, CUM IPSO EPI JPO, ' regulam servant.' Thus the bishop took no more authority in the monastery than any ordinary monk ; for the abbot ON THE CULDEES. Ixix ruled all affairs there, that is, all temporal affairs. But when the bishop went out abovit the proper duties of his office, he assumed his own character, to which no priest or abbot ever pretended. Archbishop Usher, from the Ulster Annals, informs us, that for ordinary there was a bishop who had his residence at Hii itself. And a bishop, called " Adulphus Myiensis ecclesiae Episcopus," subscribes the canons of the synod of Calcuith, A. D. 785, where the learned are of opinion, that instead of " Myiensis," it ought to be read " Hyiensis ecclesiae." Nor is it to be doubted but that a bishop com- monly resided there, as in the rest of our most ancient mo- nasteries, and that their modest and retired way of living has been one reason that we know little about them. There are several bishops mentioned in the Catalogue of Scottish Saints, here subjoined. But as that Catalogue is now printed chiefly to make known the opinions of ancient times, and to enable people to find out some chronological dates, designed by the days on which these several saints were wont to be commemorated, we shall make no inferen- ces from it in this place. SUPPLEMENT TO THE DISSERTATION ON THE CULDEES. As the foregoing account is pronounced by a very good judge* to be the best that has yet been given of the Cul- dees, it may be thought altogether unnecessary to add any thing to it ; the more especially in these times, when men of learning and candour are almost unanimous in the opi- * See Pinkerton's Inquiry, Vol. II. Part 6. chap. 1. 1XX PRELIMINARY DISSERTATION nion that, from all we know of the doctrines and prac- tice of the followers of Columba, no fair inference can be drawn which will bear with any perceptible weight on the great question of ecclesiastical polity. The reader requires not to be informed that Biondel, Selden, Baxter, and Sir James Dairy mple, imagined that they could discover, in the scheme of administration said to have been adopted by the abbot of lona, a warrant, or at least some degree of countenance, for the system of church government which distinguishes the Presbyterians ; and in pursuance of this favourite object, the last named author, in particular, exert- ed the utmost assiduity in the collection of materials, and applied them, moreover, to the point at issue, with all the zeal of an enthusiast, and with nearly all the bigotry and narrow-mindedness of a professional sectary. On the other side, Usher, Stillingfleet, Lloyd, and Gillan, endeavoured, in their several works, to expose the futility of conclusions which were founded neither on established facts nor on authentic records ; but on the fictions of authors, the earliest of whom did not exist till more than a thousand years after the period to which the most important part of his narrative refers ; and all of whom appear to have had no ground- work for their details except the uncertain traditions of their age; no guide in their enquiries besides a superstitious imagination; and no check on their statements but the credulity, almost boundless, of their several contemporaries. All reasoning acknowledged to proceed on the basis of such miserable authority, could not fail to be rejected by every lover of truth as at best extremely inconclusive ; and, accordingly, a long time had elapsed in utter neglect of Co- lumba and his disciples, when, in the year 1811, a splendid vo- lume appeared from the pen of the Rev. Dr Jamieson, entit- led an " Historical Account of the ancient Culdees of lona, and of their settlements in Scotland, England, and Ireland." 1 The learning of the author and his reputation for antiqua- rian research excited at first some curiosity respecting his ON THE CULDEES. book; but a candid perusal soon satisfied the* greater number of his readers that investigation is useless where there is nothing to be found ; that erudition unsupported by historical evidence makes but very slow progress in con- vincing the understanding ; and also that the most plausible species of logical dexterity proves only a poor substitute for sound premises and a legitimate conclusion. Some readers, also, might perhaps think they could occasionally perceive, in this performance, the love of system prevailing over that of historical accuracy ; and imagine that the accomplished writer, in more places than one, shews a greater desire to bend even the strongest facts to coincide with his hypothe- sis, than to follow them out steadily and feiirlessly in their direct and obvious bearing. In a word, an ungenerous ad- versary might have the hardiness to assert that, in a few instances, the spirit of controversy has led the venerable author to adopt some of its worst stratagems ; and that his ardour in the establishment of a good cause has, from time to time, materially impaired the clearness of his intellectual vision in regard to certain of those trivial matters in conduct- ing an argument, which are usually thought to have no small influence in marking the boundaries which separate what men ought to believe from what they ought to reject. But, dismissing these unworthy surmises, it will in ge- neral be agreed, that the main value of this work on the Culdees consists in the very minute and expanded view which it exhibits of nearly all the statements and reason- ings which are to be found on the same subject in older and less elegant volumes : the author having every where most judiciously avoided that invidious kind of responsibility which so often follows the discovery of new lights on all con- troverted topics ; and which even sometimes assails the peace of him who succeeds in giving fresh vigour to an old argu- ment, or in investing an antiquated objection with the force and poignancy of an original truth. The sole interest, it is well known, which attaches to the PRELIMINARY DISSERTATION history of the Culdees arises from certain peculiarities which they are supposed to have entertained in relation to faith and discipline: And, in reference to the latter, Dr Jamieson ob- serves that, " by some it has been urged, and certainly not without great appearance of reason., that the govern- ment of these societies of Culdees bore a very near resem- blance to the Presbyterian form.'" Before proceeding to examine into the grounds upon which this " great appearance of reason"" is made to rest, it may be useful to remark, that the term Ctddees, as being comparatively recent, and importing no distinction as refer- able to any particular rule of monachism, may be left entire- ly out of sight. It appears to have been applied generally to that most ancient order of Religious who, in the begin- ning of the fifth century, introduced into the remotest parts of Britain and Ireland, the unnatural obligations of celi- bacy and retirement from the world ; and as the expression meant no more than that the holy persons in relation to whom it was used had devoted themselves to the service of God, or shut themselves up in cells, it will be admitted that no inference can be drawn from it respecting any special rule or institution that could be distinctively called Culdean. They were, in short, as far as antiquaries can discover, the first order of monks that settled in the British isles ; and wherever the Celtic language was used, whether in Scotland, Ireland, or Wales, the name of Culdee was given to every one who, relinquishing the temporal pursuits of life, joined an association of similar characters, for the purposes of fasting, meditation, and prayer. But it is with the monks of lona, the disciples of Colum- ba, that our argument is exclusively concerned ; and, to as- sist the reader in determining whether there be, in fact, any reason for believing that these celebrated recluses had a dif- ferent creed, and different notions of church government from the men of their age, these two points shall be consi- dered separately. But, before entering into particulars on ON THE CULDEES. Ixxiii either of these heads, let it be asked whether, on general grounds, it be at all probable that, as both the Irish and the inhabitants of the south of Scotland were taught by mission- aries from Rome, of whom the chief were Ninian, Palladius, and St Patrick, there would be any discrepancy amongst the converts, in that illiterate and uninquiring age, respecting the things they were desired to believe or the usages which they were enjoined to observe. Is it not to be presumed that, to the full amount of their belief and practice, whatever might be the extent of these, the Irish and Picts believed and act- ed just as the Christians at Rome, as well as those among the Britons, their neighbours, believed and acted at the same pe- riod ? There is, indeed, no ground to doubt, that at the early epoch under consideration, the whole body of Chris- tians in the British isles displayed the most exact uniformi- ty in their ritual ; and, among an ignorant people, the ce- remonies of religion are the only medium through which can be ascertained the articles of their faith as well as the object and intention of their worship. Now, when we reflect that Columba, who established his monastery at lona about the year 560, came from Ire- land, where every thing ecclesiastical had been established by St Patrick on the Romish model, we are warranted to conclude, unless the contrary can be proved upon sound historical evidence, that he brought with him the same doc- trines, in regard to faith and discipline, which were held by his converted countrymen at large. The Christian religion, it is well known, followed in the tract which was marked out by the arms of Rome, the missionary always treading, although at some distance, in the footsteps of the soldier : And no inference surely can be more legitimately deduced from the ordinary laws of human nature and from the general practice of mankind, than that the Roman priest would com- municate to the Britons, Picts, and Scots the very things which he himself believed, and which were believed and practised by those who sent him. PRELIMINARY DISSERTATION It has accordingly been found, that, until the controversy about the proper day on which the festival of Easter ought to be kept disturbed the unanimity of the church in these islands, our Christian ancestors had nothing on which to differ. Their belief appears to have been uniform and un- broken ; whilst their practice in holy things seems to have been regulated by the same authority, and to have proceed- ed in accordance with the same ritual, or in compliance with the same traditions. So far, therefore, as is known to the antiquary or the historian, there was not, at the time when Columba settled in lona, any difference of opinion among the worshippers of Christ, whether in Britain or Ireland, either respecting the limits of their creed or the mode of their church government. . But, say those who have adopted the views of Selden and Sir James Dalrymple, we find that the disciples of Colum- ba did actually differ from the church of Rome, both in respect of faith and discipline ; and that, in their notions on these two most important points, they exhibited a remark- able resemblance to the purest order of modern Protes- tants. The reader will be pleased to favour me with his patience, while I lay before him a summary of the argu- ments, by which the ingenious writers here alluded to, have attempted to establish their position. 1. First, then, as to the doctrinal points in which the Co- lumbans are supposed to have differed from the church of Rome, I shall follow the order observed by Dr Jamieson, and advert briefly to the keeping of Easter, Auricular Confession, The Tonsure, Mode of Baptism, The Real Presence, Idolatrous Worship. It is well known, that the rule according to which EASTER SUNDAY was determined when the Romans first converted the natives of Britain and Ireland, was different from that which was afterwards introduced at Rome by Dionysius Exiguus ; and as, during a considerable time after the with- drawment of the legions from the British isles, scarcely any ON THE CULDEES. IxXV intercourse subsisted between the capital and this distant part of the empire, the Irish and Picts, as well as the Bri- tons, continued to observe the festival of the resurrection according to the cycle which they had originally received. When the mother church at length-, in the course of the sixth century, renewed once more her attention to the Christians in Britain, she was amazed to find that one of the most solemn of her periodical solemnities was kept by her children there in an uncanonical manner ; and imagining that, in this irregularity, they symbolized with the heretics of the East, or even with the Jews themselves, she used all her influence to make them adopt the new calculation, and thereby to join with the great body of the Western church in the observance of this annual feast. The clergy here defended their practice on the ground that they had de- rived their paschal cycle from the followers of the good Si John ; and thus, both parties, already entirely ignorant of the true nature of the controversy which they were pleased to maintain with each other, were equally resolute in sup- porting the canonical authority of their respective usages. After a few years, however, the arts or eloquence of the Roman priests prevailed ; and the Pope found, in the abbot of lona himself, a sedulous and devoted convert to the new lunar calendar. If there be any honour or merit in having opposed for a time the use of a new calendar in the British churches, the Columbans are, no doubt, entitled to a share of that repu- tation ; inasmuch as they certainly joined with the clergy in other parts of the kingdom in disputing the authority by which it was urged upon their acceptance, and even conti- nued their opposition after the Saxons and a few of the Bri- tons had yielded to the wishes of the Roman court. But, let me appeal to the candour of the reader, and ask him, whether this hesitation in receiving a new cycle from an Italian missionary, is to be considered as a proof that the primitive clergy of Britain differed in point of doctrine from IxXVi PRELIMINARY DISSERTATION the great body of European Christians ? The question was not, whether Easter should or should not be observed as a stated festival of the church ; but simply, whether it should be kept according to an ancient method of calculating the paschal season, or according to a scheme that was somewhat more modern. It was, in short, altogether a matter of order, and not of faith ; it might be connected with a problem in astronomy, but could not be viewed as having any affinity to a theological tenet, whether speculative or systematic. 2. AURICULAE CONFESSION is said to be one of those prac- tices, in the rejection of which our ancestors maintained their natural character for good sense and purity of doc- trine. But where is the evidence for this ? It is drawn, in the first place, from a letter addressed by the celebrated Alcuin, abbot of Canterbury, to same learned men in Ire- land, (which he calls the Province of the Scots,) in which the zealous monk expresses his regret that, according to re- port, " none of the laity made confession to the priests." The next proof is obtained from a writer of the twelfth century, St Bernard, the abbot of Clairvaux, who, in speak- ing of Malachy bishop of Armagh, observes, that he " anew instituted the most salutary use of confession."" It may be doubted whether the reader will be satisfied with the very general conclusion which is founded by DrJ. on these meagre and indistinct notices ; which, it will be observed at the same time, apply to the relaxed habits of a neighbour- ing nation, and not even indirectly to the disciples of Co- lumba. Perhaps, too, it may be inferred, from the assur- rance that Malachy renewed the practice of confession, that it must have been in use at a more early period, and, con- sequently, that the argument of the learned author proves rather too much for the object which he had in view. 3. Dr Jamieson derives much comfort from contem- plating the steady and orthodox conduct of the Pictish clergy, who, after the example of the monks of lona, gave a de- ON THE CULDEES. cided preference to their own TONSURE, compared with the more modern cut of the Popish court. Augustine, that most priggish of prelaticai monks, never ceased, as every one knows, to extol the superior style in which the process of clipping and shaving was accomplished at Rome. No friseur in our days, even after having visited the principal cities in Europe, could be more loquacious on the elegance of his art, and on the dexterity of his manipulations, than was this archbishop of Canterbury : and such was the rage for introducing his more fashionable tonsure into all parts of Britain and Ireland, that learned missionaries were ap- pointed to preach on its importance, and to illustrate by regular argument, and appeals to scripture, its powerful efficacy in furthering the everlasting welfare, as well as the earthly happiness, of the whole Christian priesthood. But all the zeal and labours of Augustine were in vain when opposed by the firm faith of our northern presbyters. These worthy sons of our ancient church expressed their utter ab- horrence of so gross an innovation declared boldly that they would continue to shave the crown of their heads agreeably to the exact pattern which they had all along followed, and which, they were satisfied, possessed the high authority of St John the apostle, and of St Polycarp the bishop ; and that however compliant the Saxons might be under their Romish metropolitan, and however fickle the Britons might prove in regard to the pernicious novelty with which their stedfastness was thus menaced, the disciples of Ninian, Palladius, and Columba, would be found ready to resist unto the death. But the power of fashion is of all things the most seducing and delusive. Even grave Divines are not at all times proof against its fascinating advances. The demure monks of lona, accordingly, were at length prevailed upon to shave like other priests ; for we find that they adopted the new tonsure much about the same time that they admitted the new calendar as their future guide to the canonical Easter. No sincere Scotchman will refuse to participate with PRELIMINARY DISSERTATION Dr Jamieson in the triumph which he derives from these historical notices, as furnishing to us the most unimpeach- able evidence of the independence of the Pictish church ; though there are authors, no doubt, who, with the venerable Bede, will ascribe the tardy reception of these new modes and usagesto the remote local situation of our ancient clergy; who, continuing long ignorant of what was going on in more busy scenes, and being altogether unaffected by the sympathetic emotions which are created in the minds of those who follow the steps of an ambitious leader, or who watch the progress of important changes, were naturally more disposed to resist innovation than to inquire into the reasons by which it might be recommended. But in what- ever light these occurrences are to be viewed, they cannot surely be regarded as affording the smallest countenance to the opinion that, in point of doctrine, the Pictish, British, or Irish church differed in the minutest article from the church of Rome. 4. It is clear, from the language of Bede, as well as from the complaint of Lanfranc, archbishop of Canterbury, that the British and Irish churches did not, in administer- ing the ordinance of BAPTISM, adhere closely to the ritual which had been adopted at Rome. The primate just nam- ed, in his Letter to Tordelvachus, one of the kings of Ire- land, laments that infants were, in that country, " baptized by immersion, without the consecrated chrism. 1 ' But it is not easy to see how this fact applies to the Culdees of lona in particular, or on what ground the rejection of a ceremony by the priests of Ireland can be held to establish a general purity of doctrine among our Scottish ancestors. 5. As toCoNFiRMATioN, which is reckoned by Dr Jamieson as one of the corruptions of Christianity, he merely observes that it has been inferred, from the language of Bernard, that it was quite in disuse, if at all ever known, among the Irish Culdees ; " for, in his life of Malachy, he says that he anew instituted the sacrament of confirmation." This ON THE CULDEES. observation will, unquestionably, have great weight in es- tablishing the orthodoxy of Colurnba's disciples ! 6. The doctrine of the REAL PRESENCE is the next topic selected whereby to prove the soundness of the faith which distinguished our Scottish ancestors. If, by the real pre- sence, Dr Jamieson means the tenet of transubstantiation, his reasoning in favour of the Culdees, at the period to which he alludes, will be acknowledged to be most conclu- sive and satisfactory, inasmuch as the speculations upon which Paschasius ventured in the ninth century were not likely to taint the creed of our countrymen hi the eighth. The only proof which the learned author produces in sup- port of Culdean orthodoxy is extracted from a Commen- tary on the eleventh chapter of the First Epistle to the Co- rinthians, written by a Bishop Sedulius who attended a council at Rome in the year 721 ; being somewhat more than a hundred years before the doctrine of the real presence had become a subject of controversy in the Christian world. 7. The Culdees, we are further told, appear to have with- stood the "IDOLATROUS WORSHIP"" of the Roman church; but the sole evidence for this is confined to the single circumstance that it was the common practice of the former to " dedicate their principal churches to the Holy Trinity, and not the Blessed Virgin, or any saint." After ascribing its due value to this distinction, the Doctor adds, that " it seems highly probable that the church of Brechin, which has been generally viewed as a remnant of Pictish architecture, had a similar dedication, as the principal market held there is still call- ed Trinity, by corruption, Tarnty Fair" In this most convincing manner are our forefathers of the sixth, seventh, eighth, and ninth centuries, acquitcd of the heinous sin of idolatry, that is, of naming their churches after favourite saints. Those readers, however, who may have the curiosity to know whether this supposed resistance to a superstitious usage has any foundation in fact, or is at all supported by the history of the early times 1XXX PRELIMINARY DISSERTATION to which the question relates, will find some observations worthy of their attention in Gillan's Remarks on Sir James Dalrymple' > s Collections. What, then, is the amount of the evidence, and what is the value of the reasoning by which the erudite author of the " Historical Account of the Ancient Culdees" attempts to establish the purer faith of these celebrated monks, as well as their systematic opposition to the Romish church in regard to rites and ceremonies ? They are, in the utmost degree, trifling and frivolous ! Except in the disputed article of the Easter calendar and the affair of the tonsure, it is impos- sible to fix on any one thing in which, at the end of the sixth century, the Christians of Britain and Ireland differ- ed from those of Italy ; and it is well known that these points of difference were not confined to the British churches, but were agitated with equal zeal in other parts of Christendom ; and, moreover, that the Scots yielded their assent to the dogmas of Rome on these very heads, and adopted both the tonsure and the new cycle, long before the Britons in the southern division of the island would depart from their ancient practice. The immaculate and conscientious Culdees of lona, (if Culdees they must be named,) with their abbot at their head, set the example of compliance to the older Christians of the Roman province ; but these sturdy believers, on the contrary, scorning the ac- commodating policy of the Columbans, continued to keep their festival on their own day, and shave their crowns after their accustomed fashion. The clergy of Pictland and Dal- riad, therefore, are entitled to much less honour for oppos- ing Romish innovation than the bishops and presbyters a- mong the Britons ; for though farther removed from temp- tation, the former yielded much sooner to the false reason- ing or the secular inducements which were urged upon them by the Saxon primate and his busy emissaries. Wherefore, then, are the followers of Columba decorated, solely and exclusively, with the praise of firmness, purity, and ON THE CULDEES. sound views ; why are they extolled as the only clergy, in ancient times, who had sense to perceive what was wrong, and principle enough to oppose it ; why are they held up as prototypes of all the wisdom and zeal, and energy and self-devotedness, which are so justly ascribed to most of the leading men who, at a later period, conducted the Refor- mation to its happy issue ; and all this, too, in the face of the notorious fact that they succumbed and complied long before the great body of Christians in their neighbourhood were even shaken from their stedfastness ? The answer is ob- vious : there have been authors in Scotland, in the course of the last hundred years, who were determined to find, in the early annals of their country, a model and a warrant for the things which had become popular in their own days ; and not being satisfied with making out that, in ecclesiasti- cal concerns, they are now the purest society on earth, they insist upon also proving that if they ever were polluted by erroneous doctrine, or superstitious practices, it was only for a very short time, and by means of the most unprincipled and irresistible constraint As an apology for these tedious observations, I may be permitted to state, that the reasoning contained in the " His- torical Account of the Ancient Culdees," on this particular subject, is directed against the opinions which are expressed on the same head in the above dissertation. Mr Goodall re- marks, at page lix, that " whereas it has been alleged and maintained that the disputes which the Culdees had with some Bishops and Canons were on account of differences about religious tenets, it will appear, by examining into the in- stances alleged, that it was not so ; but merely such dis- putes as the Bishops and Canons had pretty frequently among themselves, about money, lands, and privileges. 1 ' " Yea, (he adds,) they differed no more in religion from the rest of the church of Rome than Black Friars do from White. 1 ' It was, accordingly, to prove that Goodall was in the wrong, that Dr Jamieson found it expedient to enter IXXXU PRELIMINARY DISSERTATION into the detail of which some notice has just been taken; jxnnting out no fewer than eight particulars in which the Columbans are said to have preferred their own ceremonies to those practised by the Romish priests. But had the Doctor really intended to meet the argu- ment of his adversaries in its full strength, he would not have remained content with his remarks on the controversy about the tonsure and the canonical cycle for finding Easter Sunday. He had in his hand Bishop Gillari's book in re- ply to Sir James Dalrymple, as well, perhaps, as the Life of Sage, by the same author ; and he could not fail to per- ceive that, in both these tracts, the Culdees are charged with a much closer conformity to the church of Rome than can be implied in the mere keeping of a festival on the same day, or in shaving their heads agreeably to the same pat- tern. The following paragraph contains a summary of Gillan's observations. " The Culdees cannot lye said to have opposed the corrup- tions of the Church of Rome, since we find that the ancient Scots so far agreed with that church that they even en- tertained a great many opinions, all which our Presbyteri- ans condemn as Popish ; and some of them are rejected by all Protestants : And this they did, not only after the year 716, as the vindicator (Sir James) understands it, but even before they embraced the Romish communion and conform- ed in the matter of Easter and the tonsure. It was shewn (in Sage's Life) that they were for Episcopacy, and Dioce- san Episcopacy ; that they believed in Purgatory, and that souls were deh'vered out of it before the day of judg- ment, by the alone prayers and fastings of the living, and especially by masses ; that they practised private confession; that they had no less regard and veneration for reliques than the Romanists have now ; and that the relics of the Apostles were sought for from ah 1 places, and altars built in honour of them, and they believed that miracles were done by them : That they consecrated churches, and for this end ON THE CULDEES. used lioly water, by which they thought also diseases were cured : Churches were dedicated to the honour of the bles- sed Virgin and Apostles : They used holy oil, by which they believed the sea and roaring of the winds were calm- ed : They observed Lent, and all the Wednesdays and Fri- days most religiously : They erected crosses, and used the transient sign of the cross. To these may be added, that they had monasteries, consecrated abbesses, and gave all reverence and respect to monks ; they bowed their knees when they entered the church ; they followed unwritten traditions ; they had a great regard to a bishop's blessing ; their clergy wore a distinguishing garb, and they performed divine worship by a liturgy. I could prove all these things by plain testimonies, were it necessary. If, then, the Scots complied with the Romanists in what our Presbyterians call Popish errors, (and, no doubt, some of them are such,) and no instance can be produced wherein they differed from them, except some eclesiastical rites and customs, is it not reasonable to conclude that they professed the same faith, and believed the same doctrine with the Church of Rome ? And if it was so in the time when they had different com- munions, it must have been no less so after the year 716, when the Scots laid aside those rituals which had occasioned the difference, and became one and the same communion with the Church of Rome."" There are some remarks in Bishop Lloyd's book very much to the same effect. Alluding to the monastic insti- tutions, founded by St Patrick in Ireland, and by Columba in the island of lona, he reminds his reader, on the autho- rity of Adamnanus himself, an abbot of the Columban mo- nastery, and author of the life of its founder, " that among the sundry offices in that monastery there was wont to be a prayer in commemoration of St Martin? " For their of- fices of prayer in these monasteries," continues his Lord- ship, " they made use of St Martin's liturgy, namely, that which was called Gallorum Cursus : This was used amon PRELIMINARY DISSERTATION them everywhere in Britain. In Ireland they had an* other liturgy, which was called Scotorum Cursus, as Bishop Usher tells us, from a manuscript of that age. For their fasting, they observed the yearly time of Lent, and also the weekly fasts of Wednesday and Fri-> day, all the year, except betwixt Easter and Whitsuntide. This was the manner of Aidan, (educated and ordained at lona,) and his disciples, as Bede particularly informs us ; who also gives a short account of all their other bodily and spiritual exercises. These instances, 1 ' he concludes, " are enough to shew that the Scottish monks, of whom we are speaking, were like the other monks in France, and in other Episcopal countries. I do not know wherein there can be shewn any difference between them." Dr Jamieson would have shewn some confidence in the principles which he has adopted from Sir James Dalrymple and others, had he undertaken to refute the reasoning of .Lloyd, or to expose the statements of Gillan. The works of these authors were before him ; he has referred to them repeatedly with considerable bitterness of spirit ; laughed at them where he could, and sneered at them when it was not right to be merry ;* and, therefore, that he has left their assertions uncontradicted, and their conclusions unimpugn- * In reference to Bishop Gillan's arguments against the imaginary dissent of the imaginary Culdees from the Romish church, Dr Jamieson exclaims, " Here we discern the true spirit of these old Episcopalians, with whom the writer was connected. The attachment of many of them to Rome was far stronger than to any class of Protestants who did not acknowledge the di- vine right of Episcopacy." And, almost immediately after, alluding to the same class of Christians, he remarks, " But whatever the warm adherents of an exiled and popish family in this country might think of the conduct of our ancestors, or what inference soever they might deduce from the language of Bede, we," &c. Two well authenticated facts, and one sentence of sound reasoning, would have left a much better impression on the mind of a candid reader than could be produced by whole pages of such unseasonable reproach and obsolete sarcasm. ON THE CULDEES. 1XXXV ed, may be regarded, with " great appearance of reason, 1 ' as a tacit acknowledgement that he thought them too strong to be assailed, and too well founded to be overthrown. Instead, however, of resolutely encountering these con- troversialists on the broad ground of Romish supersti- tion, and proving that the ancient ecclesiastics in Scotland believed not in Purgatory, nor ever attempted to pray souls out of it ; that they knew nothing of masses, nor of private eoiifession, nor of relics, nor of holy water in con- secrating churches ; nor of the sign of the cross ; nor of holy oil, unwritten traditions, fast-ing in Lent and on Wednesdays and Fridays, bowing the knee upon enter- ing a place of worship, reverencing monks, and consecrating abbesses; instead of disproving these things, which he would be among the first to consider as specific and palpable to- kens of the " Man of Sin, and Mystery of Iniquity," the cautious defender of Culdean purity shifts the scene of dis- pute all at once from the seventh century to the twelfth, and from the monasteries of Albyn to the secular priesthood of Hibernia; and, in place of vindicating our own country- menfrom the charges brought against them,he makes haste to establish some facts, which no one has ever called in question, that the Irish, five hundred years after the period to which Gillian's strictures apply, were no better than " brute beasts ;" that they followed a rude process of baptizing, which offend- ed the delicacy of Bishop Malachy ; and that this holy man found it necessary to institute, a-new amongst them, the rites of confirmation and of auricular confession ! So much for the opposition of the Culdees to the system of the Romish Church ! II. But the ritual of the Columbans, and their mode of celebrating divine worship, are matters of very inferior im- port, when compared with the form of ecclesiastical govern- ment, of which they are supposed to have afforded an ex- ample. IXXXVI PRELIMINARY DISSERTATION When it is considered that the Culdees first present themselves to our notice, on the page of authentic history, in the attitude of maintaining their right to elect the bishops in the several sees where these monks had establishments, it may appear surprising that their practice as churchmen should ever have been adduced, in the form of an argument against the antiquity of Episcopal government. It has, in- deed, been maintained by those who think they perceive, in the system pursued in the Columban monastery at lona, the model of Presbyterian rule, that the Culdees had de- parted from their better principles long before they consent- ed to occupy the place of dean and chapter to any diocesan bishop ; and that, if we wish to ascertain their primitive doctrines in relation to ecclesiastical policy, we must exa- mine attentively into their proceedings while as yet they followed the institution of their founder, and acted under the inspection of his immediate successors. We are, at the same time, reminded that, in the words of Bede, " the island (lona) is always wont to have for its governor a Presbyter-abbot, to whose authority both the whole pro- vince, and even the bishops themselves, by an unusual con- stitution, ought to be subject, after the example of their first teacher, who was not a bishop, but a presbyter and monk."* We are informed, moreover, in the words of the same historian, that when Oswald, king of North umberland, sent to the island of Hy for a bishop, to instruct his people in the doctrines of Christianity, the council of seniors elected Aidan, one of their own number, as being worthy of the episcopate, and, having ordained him, sen thim forth to preach. " Now,"" says Dr Jamieson, " nothing can be more clear than that, according to Bede, the very same persons who * Hatere autcm solet ipsa insula rectorem semper Abbatem Fresbytevum cujus juri et omnio pruvincia, et ipsi etiani Episcopi, ordine inusitato debt act esse subject!, juxta exemplum primi Doctoris illius. qui non Episcopus, seil Pre&byter extilit et Monachus . ON THE CULDEES. IxXXVii found him worthy of the episcopate, both ordained and sent him. And who were these ? Undoubtedly, if there be any coherence in the language of the venerable historian, they were all who sat tliere, or who constituted that conventual meeting." " As we have not," he continues, " a vestige of proof from the record, that so much as one bishop was pre- sent, if all this was done by a council of Seniors or Presby- ters, how can the inference be avoided, that Aidan receiv- ed Presbytcrial ordination ? w The inference, indeed, has a very plausible seeming, and will satisfy those readers who have confined their enquiries to the volume in which it is to be found. But the most unreflecting of the author's admirers will naturally be indu- ced to ask, why should the monks of lona give the title of bishop to the brother whom they send forth ; and why should they go through the form of declaring him worthy of the episcopate ? Did the words, bishop and presbyter, mean the same thing in those days ; or was the venerable Bede, who tells the story, ignorant of the distinction usually implied in these terms ? It cannot be affirmed, either that the words were synonymous, or that Bede was not aware of their difference ; for, besides that, in his works at large, he observes the common distinction between presbyter and bishop, he marks it with particular emphasis in regard to lona itself, telling his reader, that the head of that esta- blishment was always a presbyter, and not a bishop ; and conveying, too, with considerable emphasis and no small surprise, the additional information, that the bishop there was held under a species of subjection to the abbot of the monastery. That the presbyter-monks should have acknow- ledged the superiority of their presbyter-abbot was regard- ed quite as a matter of course, and could excite no astonish- ment in a church historian : The office-bearer, therefore, who is called a bishop, and who is said to be subject, in an unusual manner, (more inusitato,) to the rector of the mo- IxXXViii PRELIMINARY DISSERTATION nastery, must necessarily have been of a different and high- er order than that of presbyter. If this be admitted, it may then be reasonably asked, how could a college of presbyters consecrate a bishop ? On what principle could they confer upon one of their brethren a rank, a power, and an authority which they themselves did not possess ? Is it possible to view such a transaction in any other light than that of a piece of solemn mockery ? They knew the difference between bishop and presbyter. The historian who narrates the occurrence was equally well acquainted with that distinction ; On what ground, then, shall we explain the conduct of these monks, which is appa- rently so inconsistent with the leading principles of their in- stitution"; or by what means shall we reconcile the use of terms which involve us in such direct contradiction ? There is only oneway of restoring probability to the nar- rative of Bede, and consistency to the proceedings of the Columban convent, which is, to admit that the bishop, who appears to have had some connection with the monastic es- tablishment at Jona to whose abbot he was in certain respects subordinate, had also some hand in the ordination of the Episcopal missionaries who were sent into Northum- berland from that famous seminary. This is the theory which Lloyd and most other writers have adopted ; and though it is very violently opposed and contemned by the learned author of the Historical Account of the Ancient Culdees, it appears, notwithstanding, to be both somewhat reasonable in itself, and also not altogether incapable of such a degree of evidence as may satisfy those who have not determined to sacrifice truth to system. 1. In the first place, we find that it was customary in other parts of the Christian world, at the very period, too, when the Columban establishment at lona was in its greatest prosper- ity, to have bishops either actually in monasteries, or specially attached to them, for the very purpose of performing those official duties to which clergymen of a lower order were^iot ON THE CULDEES. held competent ; and in particular the office of ordaining young men, when duly qualified, to the service of the holy mi- nistry. In the early times of the church, monastic establish- ments were at once the schools and the colleges in which the clergy received their education ; and as religion and learn- ing were thought to be very much advanced by the discip- line of convents, the monks were greatly encouraged ; such immunities and privileges being allowed to them by the indulgence of the age, that in many places, says the Bishop of St Asaph, * they were, in a manner, wholly free * from Episcopal jurisdiction. They governed all within * themselves, and kept some kind of authority over those that * were ordained and sent forth from their body. This gives 8 colour enough to them that are to seek for examples in * those times for the depressing of the authority of bishops. 8 But this will do them no service, when it appears, that, * notwithstanding all their exemptions, those abbots and * seniors could not ordain without a bishop, and that many 8 of them were not in orders themselves, even those that had 8 bishops subject to them in their monasteries.' i The most ancient privileges of this kind that I have 8 observed in the Western church, were those that were 8 enjoyed by the African monasteries. They were for one 8 while so exempt, that* the bishop in whose diocese they 8 were had nothing to do with them, except when they 8 themselves were pleased to make use of his assistance. 8 About the year of Christ 500,-f- they might choose 8 what bishop they pleased in the whole province, to or- 8 dain and do other Episcopal acts in their monastery. Tt 8 appears \ that whomsoever they chose they were tied to ; he was their bishop as long as he lived, but when he 8 died they were not tied to his successor, but might * Concil. Edit Labbe. Tom. IV. coJ. 1549 and 1785. B. fib. Col. 1646. D. E, Jib. . XC PRELIMINARY DISSERTATION * choose either him or any other when they pleased ; for, as they pleaded in the council of Carthage, they were* not under any bishop out of duty, but out of choice, except * only the archbishop of Carthage, who was their primate. * Afterwards, they were confined to the bishop of the dio- ' cese ; so that he,-f- and no other, when they desired it, * might ordain any whom they chose out of their number, * or might give confirmation, or might consecrate a new * oratory. And it is expressed by what pattern this was * done,:j: that it was in like manner as the monastery of * Lerin in France, (now St Honore,) was confined to the * bishop of the diocese.' 4 In France and Spain, how this matter was ordered, it 4 appears in the canons of their councils of Agathe and|j * Lerida. There was none to be ordained in any monastery * but by the bishop in whose diocese it was. But then it * must be at the desire of the abbot, or at least with his 4 leave, and not otherwise. But, besides, we find that some 4 greater monasteries had bishops in them of their own, 4 who were elected by the abbot and monks, and were or- 4 dained by the adjacent bishops, to the end that they might 4 preach and do episcopal offices in their monasteries. Of 4 this kind, we have ^j examples in St Martin's near Tours, 4 and the monastery of St Denis, near Paris, which had 4 such bishops in them from ancient times ; and we have * an account of their successions for some ages. The like 4 we have of the bishops that were in St Columba's monas- 4 tery at Hy, of whom** there is mention, in the Ulster An- 4 nals. So that, in either case, of exempt or non-exempt 4 monasteries, there were bishops to be had for the ordain- 4 ing of monks ; and no pretence to have it done by the * lb. Col. 1648. A. f Ib. Col. 1789. B. J Ib. Col. 1649. A. B. Council Agath, c. 27. || Council Lerid. e. 3. If Acta S. S. Ord. Benedict, Seculo VIII. iu Pnef. xx. xxi. ** Usser de Primard. p. 701. ON THE CULDEES. XCl * abbot, who was no bishop, though his leave or consent was * needful to the ordination.' These facts prove incontestably, that the ordinations in monasteries were performed by bishops, either belonging to the establishments themselves, or chosen by the heads of convents for that very purpose. It is proved that councils were held to regulate the relations which subsisted between the bishops and the monasteries in which they were invited to act, and to limit the power of choice in this respect on the part of the abbot and his brotherhood ; that they were tied, as Lloyd expresses it, to the bishop whom they fixed on, as long as he lived ; and that, at length, they were, in some places, restricted to the bishop of the diocese. The superior and his monks, it is clear, who were the best judges of the character and acquirements of those who were under their care, pointed out, from time to time, the persons who were to be ordained ; and then, as it would appear, the bi- shop whose services \vere engaged for the particular mo- nastery proceeded to the act of ordination, and gave to the candidates for the diaconate, or priesthood, as it might hap- pen, authority to minister in the church of Christ. * Our adversaries (says Bishop Lloyd) would have it that ' the abbot and his senior monks did ordain those who were ' sent out of their monastery ; and that not only into the ' lower orders, but into the order of bishops, as they shew ' us in the example of Aidan and his successors. But this * is so far from being true, that I dare challenge our adver- * saries to shew any instance where the abbot and monks, ' without a bishop among them, ordained so much as one 4 single presbyter. I shall shew, on the contrary, by many ' instances, that as it was necessary to have orders conferred * in the monasteries, (without which there could be no ' administration of sacraments,) so bishops were held ne- ' cessary on this very account, that they might confer or- ' ders on those that were judged fit to be ordained in the ' monasteries." 1 XC11 PRELIMINARY DISSERTATION Dr Jamieson takes no particular notice of the argument which I have just abridged, nor of |the inferences which it is so well fitted to support. He confines the attention of his readers to the individual cases which are mentioned by Bede as having occurred at lona ; and exerts all his inge- nuity to shew, that, as no bishop is mentioned as officiating at the ordination (I may not be permitted to call it consecra- tion) of Aidan and Finan, there was certainly no bishop present at either. He gives no weight at all to the consi- deration, that it was customary in other monasteries, at the very period when Aidan and Finan were ordained at lona, to employ bishops to perform that sacred office ; nor will he yield, in the slightest degree, to the probability that, as there were assuredly a bishop or bishops in subordination to the Columban abbot, their services were actually used on so important an occasion as that of raising presbyters to the episcopate. If the bishops did not officiate on such a crisis as that now referred to, what could be the intention in having this order of clergy at all ; and what were the pe- culiar duties to which they were appointed ? 2. But, taking it for granted, that the Presbyters of lona would not be guilty of the impious mockery of ordaining a brother to an order and office in the church higher than that which they themselves possessed ; and knowing, as we do know, from the best authority, that when Aidan and Finan were pronounced worthy of the episcopate, they were, by means of ordination,invested with that superior degree, are we not compelled to infer, that this ordination was con- ducted by bishops. If this inference is not allowed, I then beg leave to ask, what is meant when the venerable historian tells us, that a member of a presbyterial college was judged by his brethren worthy of the episcopate, and forthwith or- dained to it ? Were Aidan and Finan, after their ordination to the episcopate, exactly in the same order of clergy that they were before such ordination ? If they were priests be- fore, what were they afterwards ? ON THE CULDEES But Dr Jamieson reminds us, that we cannot prove they were priests before this ordination: They ma// have been only laymen. He himself, indeed, admits that the monks of lona were mostly presbyters ;* and this being the case, it must appear somewhat unaccountable that, in selecting persons from their number for the very important office of a bishop, and at the request, too, of a sovereign prince who wished to found a church in his dominions, they should always have fixed on laymen, individuals of no experience in their pro- fession, whose qualifications could be but imperfectly known, and whose characters were still in a great measure to be formed. If the Columban monks were indeed " mostly presbyters, 1 ' is it not very likely that some one of the three, Aidan, Finan, or Colman was a presbyter ? And if it be granted, that any one of them was of this rank before his or- dination to the episcopate, it must follow that the second ordination was to a higher order than that of priest, or that it was a ridiculous and most contemptible farce. Dr Jamieson must be aware, that there are limits to the argument which he derives from the supposed existence of lay members in the convent of lona ; for as, in the narra- tive of Bede, there is no vestige of evidence that the abbot was present, more than the bishop, at the deliberation of 'the monks and the subsequent ordinations which took place, he may find himself carried a little farther than he would willing- ly chuse to proceed ; and, in his eagerness to flee from Epis- copal supremacy, reduce the commission of his favourite Culdees to a mere warrant issued by laics. But there is no reason whatever for believing that any of the Columban monks were laymen. The Doctor, himself, informs us, " it has been supposed that, AS TWELVE PB.IESTS accompanied Co- lumbafrom Ireland, and settled with him in lona, they afterwards retained this number, in imitation of the conduct of their founder ;" but he has neglected to tell us at what * See Historical Account of the Ancient Culdees, p. 36. XC1V PRELIMINARY DISSERTATION time within the few years which had elapsed between their first settlement and the request of Oswald to have a bishop, they departed so far from the original model of their insti- tution as to admit laymen into their sacred college. It is only better, it would seem, that they should all be laymen, even, though they might be detected in the foolish trick of or- daining bishops for a Northumbrian king, than that any one of them should be bonajide a presbyter, and afterwards found to have submitted to a second and higher ordination inflict- ed upon him by the hands of prelates. 3. But that Aidan, Finan, and Colman were in fact raised to the rank of bishop, even as that word is usually understood in our times, is rendered manifest by their proceedings as soon as they entered upon their new office. Aidan, says the venerable Bede, was sent from Hy to convert the Angles, having received the degree of bishop, (accepto gradu Epis- copatus,) at the time when Segenius, abbot and priest, was over that monastery.* And, to use the words of Lloyd, that this ordination was into a higher order than that of presbyters, it sufficiently appears, by divers things that we read of in Bede's history ; as, namely ,-f- tluit lie chose the place of his Episcopal see in the isle of Lin disfarn ; tJiere Jte was with his clergy, and there was the abbot with his monks, who all belonged to the care of the bishop.^ For his clergy, he had divers persons that came with him from Hy ; of them, probably, were his chaplains, who went about with him, of whom one is called presbyter suus, and one or two clerici sui,\\ his presbyters, in King Al- fred's translation. Besides these, there were many presby- ters that came out of Ireland, who preached and baptized ; and so churches were built in many places throughout his diocese.^f * Bed. Hist III. 5. p. 169. \ Bed. Hist. III. 3. p. 160. \ Bed. Hist. VI. 27. p. 35. 60. Bed. Ib. III. 14. p. 200. || Bed. Ib. Ill 5. p. 170. -j[ Bed. Hist. 3. p. 167. ON THE CULDEES. XCV Bede is very diffuse in the account he gives of Bishop Aidan ; tells us how the king gave him territories and posses- sions for the founding of monasteries, and also how at one of these, which was called Heorta, he consecrated Hern abbess. He devotes whole chapters to the detail of the bi- shop's miracles ; exhibits a very flattering view of his general character ; and finds no fault in him, except in the matter of Easter, which Aidan continued to observe according to the old calendar. But, notwithstanding this discrepancy, he was not only in communion with the bishops that came from Rome, " he was even, (says the historian,) deserved- ly beloved by them, and held in veneration by the arch- bishop of Canterbury and the bishop of the East Angles ; and accordingly, after his death, he was accounted a saint by them of the Romish communion.""* " This (as Bishop Lloyd justly observes) sufficiently sheweth that they did not take him for an intruder into their order, but were very well satisfied with his ordination." But the history of Finan, who succeeded Aidan in the see of Lindisfarn, affords the strongest, the most direct, and the most unimpeachable evidence that human testimony could supply, that the persons whom the monks of lona pronoun- ced worthy of the episcopate were, in fact, bishops in the proper and ordinary sense of the term. " Having arrived in his diocese, (says Bede,) he built a church fit for an Epis- copal see ; and having shortly afterwards baptized Peada, the king of the Middle Angles, with all his court, he gave him four priests, one Scotch and three English, to instruct and baptize his people. In process of time, the Scottish priest, who was called Diuma, was ordained by Finan to be bishop of that nation, as well as of the province of Mercia. The words of the venerable historian are as fol- lows : " Factus est Diuma, unus ex praefatis quatuor sa- * Bed. Hist. IIL25. p. 255. and Vita Cuthberti, n. 7. XCVi PRELIMINARY DISSERTATION cerdotibus, episcopus Mediterraneorum Anglorum, sirfiul et Merciorum, ordinatus a Finano episcopo.* At a subsequent period, Sigebert, king of the East Angles, with his friends, was baptized by the same bishop, and received, at the same time, two priests to convert and baptize his subjects. One of these, whose name was Cedd, having, with the assistance of his colleague, gathered to- gether a great church to the Lord, returned to the esta- blishment at Lindisfarn, to inform Finan of their remark- able success in the work of evangelizing the Saxons ; with which account the Northumbrian prelate was so much gra- tified that, in order to enable him to prosecute his pious objects with still greater advantage, he resolved to raise the priest to the order of bishops. " Finan," says the histo- rian, " seeing his success in the furtherance of the Gospel, and having called to him two other bisJiopsfor the ministry of ordination, made him bishop over the nation of the East Angles ;" adding, " that he having received the degree of the episcopate, (accepto gradu episcopatus,) returned to the province ; and, with greater authority, (majore auctoritate) fulfilled the work which he had begun, erected churches in different places, ordained presbyters and deacons, who might assist him in the word of faith, and in the ministry of baptism.*^ Dr Jamieson, as might be expected, is a good deal puzzled with the episcopal transactions of Finan, which look so * Bed. Hist. 21. pp. 218, 219. f Ubi cum omnia perambulantes multam Domino ecclesiam congregassent, contigit quodain tempore eundem Cedd redire domum, ac pervenire ad ec- clesiam Lindisfaronensem, propter colloquium Finani episcopi ; qui ubi pros- peratum ei opus evangelii comperit, fecit eum episcopum in gentem Orienta- liumSaxomim, vocatis ad sein ministerium ordinationis aliis duobus episcopis: qni accepto gradu episcopatus, rediit ad provinciam, et majore auctoritate cceptum opus explens, fecit per locaecclesias, prcsbyteros et diaconos ordinavit, qui se in verbo fidei et ministerio baptizandi adjuverant, maxime in civitate quas lingua Saxonum Ythencaister appellatur. Bed. Hist. Lib. IV. c. 22- as quoted in the Historical Account of the Ancient CuJdees. ON THE CULDEES. XCVH much like those of a real diocesan bishop. " It must be admitted," he observes, " that according to Bedels narra- tive, there is something in the conduct of Finan which does not seem entirely consonant to the view given of the ordin- ation of lona. Whether this should be ascribed to some greater attachment, on the part of the Saxons, to the model of the Roman church, I shall not presently enquire. But, unless we suppose that Finan renounced the tenets of his mother church, we cannot here conclude that he viewed the office of a bishop as essentially distinct from that of a presbyter." That he viewed the office of a bishop as essentially dis- tinct from that of a presbyter, cannot, I think, be doubted by any man who has read, with candour, the foregoing pa- ragraphs ; and, taking this conclusion in connection with all that Bede relates concerning him, during the ten years that he presided over the Northumbrian church, the natural conclusion is, that he did not renounce the tenets of his mo- ther church, but, on the contrary, that those tenets were in strict accordance with the principles upon which his whole public conduct proceeded. It is allowed that Finan requested the attendance of two other bishops to join with him in giving canonical consecration to the presbyter Cedd; and, moreover, that this presbyter, when raised to the episcopate, returned to his district with greater authority, and forthwith proceed- ed to ordain priests and deacons to assist him in the word of faith and ministry of baptism : from which facts the in- ference forces itself upon our acceptance with an irresistible degree of conviction, that the tenets held at lona in regard to church government were decidedly Episcopal, and con- sequently, that Aidan, Finan, and Colman, were Episco- pally ordained. The learned author, whom I have already so often nam- ed, endeavours to turn aside the weight of this part of the argument, by allowing that the use of the words bishop and episcopate had become common in the days of Bede ; S XCV111 PRELIMINARY DISSERTATION the former of which, he adds, "from the influence of pre- judice, was reckoned more honourable than that of presby- ter." But he maintains, that the Episcopacy spoken of by the venerable historian must have been such an Episcopacy as presbyters could confer: an Episcopacy, in the conferring of which none had any hand who enjoyed a higher order than Segenius the abbot held ; " Else," says he, " why does Bede add that, at the period in question, " Segenius, abbot and monk, presided over this monastery ?" Dr Jamieson is too well acquainted with ancient customs to require to be told by me, that the notice in regard to the presidency of Segenius had no other object than to mark the date of the transac- tion ; having no relation whatever, either to the mode of ordination, or to the quality of the persons engaged in it. The fact that Segenius presided over the monastery does not, in the slightest degree, imply that he presided at the ordination of his monks : And, as far as the literal expression of Bede's narrative is to be our guide, we have no better authority for concluding that the abbot was present at the ordination of Aidan or Finan, than we have for asserting that the service was performed by a canonical number of prelates. Still, the Doctor demands a reason why the church historian does not tell his readers that bishops were really employed in conferring orders, and, more especially, the order of the episcopate, in the monastery of lona. Lloyd gives a sufficient answer when he observes that Bede was not likely to imagine that such a question would ever be aslced. There is to be found in Mr Chalmers' learned and very laborious work, entituled Caledonia, an argument for the ex- istence of bishops in the Culdean monasteries, at placeswhere there was no episcopal see. " That there was, says he, a bi- shop established among the Culdees at Brechin before the erection of the bishopric by David I. is certain, from his charter of erection, which was granted Episcopo et Kelledeis in ecclesia de Ereiclien^ * * Caledonia, Vol. 1. 430, note (y.) ON THE CULDEES. XC1X The reader will judge whether Dr Jamieson's reasoning on this historical fact invalidates the inference which the author of Caledonia has deduced from it. " Undoubtedly,'" says the Doctor, " the mode of expression used proves no- thing more than that from this time there was a bishop here. When David granted a charter, erecting Brechin into a bishopric, it may naturally be supposed that he had previously fixed on one to fill this station ; and that he gave him his title, as was frequently done, before his actual in- stalment." Had Bishop Lloyd, or Gillan, hazarded such a supposition in defence of any of their theoretical views, I know how this learned controversialist would have cha- racterized their conduct. Can the Doctor shew, let me ask, that it was customary to call a person bishop before he was either elected or installed, and even before his bishopric was erected ? If he can, his ratiocination will then be allowed to have at least the advantage of that probability in which it is, at present, most materially deficient. The whole of the difficulty and confusion, in short, which have been created by those who are determined to see, in the practice of the Columban monks, the model of a Pres- byterian church, arises from not giving its proper meaning to that very common form of speech, which attributes to those who procure a thing to be done, the merit, and some- times even the act of doing it. The college chose one of their number, whom they thought most worthy of the epis- copate, to discharge the important duties attached to that office ; and ordaining him, says the historian, they sent him to King Oswald. No mention is made of either bishop or abbot ; and, I may remark once more, that if we restrict our conclusions to the limits of the bare statement now given, we must believe that all the members of the convent, lay and clerical, proceeded, the moment they had fixed on the person worthy of the bishopric, to invest him with the sacred character, and dismiss him to his charge. Let those, however, who have any difficulty in satisfying themselves C PRELIMINARY DISSERTATION how matters were really conducted on such occasions, con- sult the practice of other monasteries at the same period : and they will find, from statements given at considerable length above, that no ordinations were performed without the ministry of bishops ; and, moreover, that the official relations of bishops to those monastic establishments had been made a subject of public regulation by the judicatories of the church, both in Europe and Africa. If Finan received only presbyterial ordination, and was called a bishop among the Saxons, only to gratify their pre- judices in favour of the latter order of clergy, on what prin- ciple shall we account for the part which he acted in the consecration of Cedd ; when he sent for two other bishops to assist him in that important ministry, and to confer upon the sedulous presbyter what Dr Jamieson himself acknow- ledges to have been, " episcopal ordination?" All this, the learned writer just named, is pleased to insinuate, was nothing more than an act of complaisance, calculated to tickle the fancies of the barbarian Saxons. " But," says the Doctor, " though he might deem such a compliance expedient, there is no satisfactory evidence that he viewed the office of bishop as essentially different from that of pres- byter. For had he done so, he must have denied the va- lidity of his own orders ; and he could never pretend to take any share in conferring on another a power which he did not himself possess." The character of Finan is certainly very little indebt- ed to the author of such strictures ; but, if the bishop of Lindisfarn was not a fool, as well as an unprincipled intruder, he would assuredly never have followed the line of conduct which he actually pursued, had he held no higher com- mission than a licence from the presbyter-monks of lona. We are to suppose, if we adopt Dr Jamieson's views, that he coolly planned for himself a predicament which could not fail to expose his deceit, and to hold up all his pretensions to ridicule ; inasmuch as he, although only in priest's orders, resolves to exalt a brother-presbyter to the ON THE CULDEES. Cl episcopate, and for this purpose sends for two bishops to concur with him in the ministry of consecration. Did Cedd not know what kind of orders were given at lona ? Did not the two bishops, who are said to have been Scots, know the rank which Finan must have held if he was ordained in that monastery ? And yet this nominal prelate of Lindisfarn invites them to attend a consecration at which he himself was to preside, or, in other words, to assist a mock bishop in making a real one. How could he presume to make such a proposal to Cedd ! Must not such a burlesque proceeding have been contemplated on all hands with indignation and contempt ? And yet we find that Cedd was in fact conse- crated a bishop ; that he returned with greater authority to the province whence he came, of which London was the capital ; built churches, and ordained priests and deacons to assist him in the word of faith and in the ministry of bap- tism. We must, therefore, unless we are determined to give to absurdity a gratuitous preference, admit that Finan was clothed with the episcopal character, and that he acted honestly and consistently in the discharge of his high duties as a Christian bishop. It is painful to observe how far, in certain circumstances, the power of prepossession will oppose itself to the clearest statements of the plainest facts. " It is true, indeed," says the ingenious author whose work has suggested so many of the above remarks, " that Bede speaks of Cedd as deriving ' greater authority from his episcopal ordination, and as ordaining presbyters and deacons in consequence of it. But it may naturally enough be supposed, that the eccle- siastical historian expresses himself according- to his own prejudices, and the general sentiments of the age in which he wrote !" III. The extensive jurisdiction of the monastery of lona has also been the subject of some dispute among the learn- ed, especially in regard to the manner it was exercised over the clergy who had received ordination within its walls. Cll PRELIMINARY DISSERTATION There is no doubt that Columba founded numerous con- vents both in Ireland and in the central parts of Scotland, and that all the monks who submitted to his rule owned his authority and imitated his example. We are accor- dingly told by Bede, when speaking of the island which he calls Hii, that the monastery there ' for a long time held * the supremacy among almost all the monasteries of the * Northern Scots, (or Irish,) and those of all the Picts, and * presided in the government of their people.'* The jurisdiction here mentioned evidently applies to the inhabitants of the monasteries exclusively, though Dr Jamieson thinks proper to extend it to " the subjects of the Scottish and Pictish thrones ,-" and could only be un- derstood as affecting the monks in matters connected with their rule or institution. It has been the object, however, of more writers than one to exhibit the control of the Co- lumban college over all the clergy in the north of Ireland as weU as in Scotland, whether bishops or presbyters, as resembling that of a modern presbytery over the ministers within its bounds. The abbot of lona has in one place been called the *' Primate of all the Irish bishops ;"" and we are reminded by the industrious author of the Historical Account of the Ancient Culdees, that the same personage extended his monastic regimen over all the priests and pre- lates who had issued from his seminary, whether dwelling on the shores of Argyle or on the banks of the Thames. Admitting this statement to have a good foundation, how are we to explain the conduct of Aidan, and particu- larly that of Finan, who, as soon as they were seated in their rustic cathedral of Lindisfarn, pursued a system of eccle- siastical polity directly opposite to that which they are sup- posed to have learned and revered at lona ? Why did not * Insula qnae vocatur Hyi, cujus monasterium in cunctis pene Septentrio- r.alium Scottorum, omnium Pictorum monastcriis non parvo tempore arcem tcnebat, regendisque eorum populis praerat. Hut. Lib. iii. c. 3. ON THE CULDEES. fill the abbot check them in their episcopal projects and con- nections ? How could he permit them to consecrate ab- besses, ordain bishops, and call in the aid of other prelates to assist them in their hierarchical schemes ? Was he not accustomed to command bishops, Laving one at least in his own district constantly under his dominion ; and had he not time enough to arrange a system of control, or to punish his refractory dependants, considering that Aidan was seventeen years, and Finan ten, in the Northumbrian dic- cese ? It is amusing to perceive the various shifts with which Sir James Dalrymple and his modern coadjutor per- plex their ingenuity, in order to account for this remission of discipline on the part of the Columban abbot. The former hints that it may have arisen from the distance and the latter observes, that " we may -well suppose that the intercourse by land from Hii to Northumbria was fre- quently interrupted by the wars between the Picts and Scots," &c. Does Dr Jamieson remember where it is writ- ten, that " Supposition is often of signal use when there is a deficiency of evidence. There is obviously no founda- tion for the supposition which is here made.? 11 * I have taken no special notice of the much litigated point respecting the subjection of the bishop to the abbot of lona. The fact is plainly stated by Bede ; and, whatever may be the precise import of the expression in which it is conveyed, the faith of history would be violated were we either to per- vert or expunge it. It is, at the same time, admitted by all who have read the passage with a due reference to the practice of the age in which it was written, that the supe- riority of the abbot must have consisted in some of his monas- tic attributes, as head of a parent establishment, and that it could have no respect to the spiritual functions of a presby- ter as opposed to those of a bishop. Within the walls of a college, the master or provost is superior, quoad omnes res * See Historical Account of the Ancient Culdees, p. 251. CIV PRELIMINARY DISSERTATION Academicas, to the highest prelate in the land ; and in Christ-church, Dublin, as well as in Christ-church, Oxford, the Dean uniformly takes rank (more inusitato, as Bede would word it,) of the bishop of the diocese. These, it is clear, are matters of special compact or particular institu- tion, and will never be adduced by those who have any confidence in the goodness of their cause, to invalidate a general principle, or to weaken a conclusion drawn from long and almost universal practice. IV. Those authors who have laboured to make it appear that the monks of lona were presby terians in principle, have likewise attempted to convince their readers, that the Scot- tish bishops were uniformly hostile to the Culdees, (whom they are pleased always to identify with the said monks) and that they never ceased to use either force or fraud, until they finally succeeded in rooting them out. It is true the bishops and the Culdees were not always on good terms; but the cause of their differences, when these respected religion, did not arise, as has been insinuated, from the superior sanctity of the latter order of men. On the contrary, they were not pure enough for the spiritual character of the times ; as they chose to have wives and families in their convents, and to secure for their sons, in a long line of hereditary succession, their various appointments, both monastic and secular, with all the emoluments and privileges which attached to the discharge of them. Their principal disputes, too, were about lands and tithes, and especially about the right which they claimed, in capacity of dean and chapter, to elect the bishops of their respective sees : And we find, accordingly that on one occssion, when the privilege now mentioned was denied to them, they boldly appealed to the Pope, who de- cided in favour of their opponents, on the sole ground that the others had allowed their right to lapse. Of men who strove so resolutely to retain the privilege of choosing a diocesan bishop, who even appealed to the Court of Rome, in order to recover that privilege when it ON THE CULDEES. CV was lost, it seems very paradoxical to assert that the pre- lates of .the eleventh and twelfth centuries wished to rid themselves, merely because the former entertained opinions hostile to Episcopacy, and to thejgeneral polity which then prevailed in the Western church. Sir James Dalrymple explains, with singular industry, the nature of the war that was carried on against these devoted 'Culdees ; and Dr Ja- mieson informs us that it continued several hundred years before its nefarious object was fully accomplished a proof that the belligerents had sometimes rested on their arms, and did actually urge a bellum ad mternecionem. In truth, things were not so very bad as it seems proper to certain authors to represent them ; for it will be found that the bishops, instead of always pulling down Culdean mo- nasteries, occasionally employed their funds in building new ones. But it did not at all suit the object which Sir James Dalrymple had in view, to exhibit a single instance of episcopal munificence, or even of forbearance : and so the reader will find, at page lix. of Mr GoodalTs Disserta- tion, that the Baronet, in narrating the conditions of a cer- tain charter, purposely conceals the fact that the Bishop of Aberdeen had founded the convent of Culdees at Moni- musk, and that the prior swore fealty to him, AS THE FOUNDER OF THEIR HOUSE. The following paragraph contains the explanation offered by Dr. Jamieson.* " I have examined the chartulary, and find that it con- tains the words omitted by Sir James. If he withheld this clause because he viewed it as tending to overthrow his hypothesis, undoubtedly it was not consistent with that can- dour which he almost uniformly manifested. But in mak- ing the quotation referred to, it does not appear that he transcribed from the chartulary itself, but from the MS. Collection of Mr James Law of Bogis, to which he refers. Whether the deed might not be so fully extracted in that collection, I cannot pretend to say !" * See the Historical Account of the Ancient Culdees, p. 83. CV1 PRELIMlNAliT DISSERTATION The omission of the clause, however, was so extremely fa- vourable to Sir James"" hypothesis, that hardly any degree of candour will suggest the probability of its being acci- dental. This little stratagem, the Baronet was aware, would keep out of view a very palpable proof, both that the Cul- dees were willing to comply with the Romish system, when their own interests were to be benefited by the conformity, and also that the bishops did not regard the existence of the Columban order as in any measure incompatible with the prosperity of an Episcopal establishment. . V. But granting all that Sir James and the writers on his side have endeavoured so unsuccessfully to prove in regard to the Culdees, what inferences, I ask, could possibly be de- duced from the utmost concession in support of their favour- ite system of ecclesiastical polity ? Let it be admitted, for example, that there was no bishop attached to the monas- tery of lona ; that the Episcopal Order was not even recog- nised ; that the convent consisted of twelve persons, lay and clerical indiscriminately ; and that all the ordinations were performed by these monks en masse : Let it be farther conceded, that the abbot and his brethren retained a re- gular spiritual jurisdiction over all the churches planted and filled by means of his missionaries ; that he was ' pri- mate of all the Hibernian bishops," and that he extended his ghostly superintendance to the waters of the Thames, and even to the city of London : Let it be allowed that the head of that celebrated convent not only enjoyed the supremacy - in all the monasteries of Ireland and of Pictland, but that, as Dr Jamieson will have it, he governed " the subjects of the Scottish and Pictish thrones."" Grant, in short, every thing that is claimed, whether in the way of fact or of ar- gument, and, I repeat the question, what conclusion can be drawn from the practice of the Columban college, that will in the slightest degree fortify the argument in favour of Presbyterian discipline ? In the constitution of that convent we might perhaps discover the model of a missionary asso- ON THE CULDEES. CVU elation, of which the chief object was to prepare labourers for the Christian vineyard ; but assuredly we shall only waste our penetration if we attempt to trace, in the usages of a monastic establishment, any resemblance to the polity of a Presbyterian church, including its variety of judica- tories and its constant and periodical succession of office- bearers. It is not prudent to trust so weighty an argument to a fonndation so extremely narrow and insecure. Even on the ground of the concessions which have just been made, the reasoning is futile and the conclusions totally inapplicable to the subject of controversy ; what then shall we think of an hypothesis which must proceed without the support of almost every one of the facts, upon which, for the sake of contrast, it has been here, for a moment, made to rest ! If in any circumstances, we are permitted to form a j udgment concerning the principles entertained by a community from the public and uniform conduct of its members, when called to fill responsible situations under the eye of the world, we are certainly warranted to conclude that the monks of lona were not dissenters from the ordinary church-government of their age : For it admits not of a reasonable doubt that Aidan, Finan, and Colman acted as diocesan bishops ; and it is, moreover worthy of special re- mark that these are the only disciples of the Columban ab- bot of whom authentic history has preserved any account. It will therefore appear, that the conclusions to the sup- port of which Dr Jamieson directs his reasoning, have no foundation whatever either in fact or analogy. The infe- rences which he draws are opposed by the general current of our ecclesiastical annals, by the universal practice of the Christian world, and even by the professional conduct of those very persons upon whose supposed principles his ar- gument is chiefly founded. Such policy on the part of an author is not less weak than injudicious ! The Presbyterian in Scotland has a much better voucher for the excellence of his church than could be derived from the example or the in- CViii PRELIMINARY DISSERTATION stitutions of Irish monks, how well soever these might be es- tablished by historical evidence. He has the approbation and support of nearly the whole body of the people ; and he can appeal to thebeneficial effects of his doctrine and ministrations as affording one of the strongest as well as the most pleasant proofs that these are not altogether destitute of Divine coun- tenance and authority. Let him therefore leave to the Epis- copalian churches all the credit they can derive from the ob- scure transactions of their monks and abbots. Antiquity is a dangerous ground to those who have greater reason to boast of a successful reform, in times not long gone by, than of a very precise or solicitous imitation of models which were found to suit better with the habits of a primitive age. It cannot have escaped observation, that Presbyterian writers on church-government have usually satisfied them- selves with an attempt to make out, not that their own sys- tem has the sanction of Divine authority or even of pri- mitive usage ; but that the proof in favour of diocesan Epis- copacy is not entire, and that the scheme of discipline by bishops and archbishops cannot be traced to the very age of the Apostles. It is not pretended by these authors that the flock of Christ was at any time, prior to the Reformation, governed by presbyteries, synods, and assemblies, held by the second order of ministers : their arguments in general do not aim at a higher object than to perplex the reasoning of their adversaries in support of a different polity ; and to wrest from the Episcopalian a reluctant acknowledgment that his pattern of ecclesiastical rule originated in views of human expediency, and not in the direct institution of the Divine Head of the Church. Dr. Campbell, for example, was not displeased to find that the result of his learned in- quiry into the history of our holy religion, afforded a great degree of countenance to a body of Christians who have less system and fewer pretensions to established form than almost any other ; and that the practice of the first worship- pers of Christ is decidedly in favour of the scheme adopted ON THE CULDEES. C1X by the Independents. Dr. Jamieson, again, in his eager- ness to weaken the cause of Episcopacy, has entirely over- looked the interests of Presbyterianism : all his labour, his erudition, his ingenuity, and his historical knowledge hav- ing been sedulously employed, throughout almost every page of a large quarto volume, to establish the singular po- sition, that the purest period of Scottish antiquity is to be identified with a system of ecclesiastical government, exer- cised by a fraternity of monks under the direction of a tonsured abbot ! That the confidence of the reader in the conclusions which I have stated above relative to the Culdees may be confirmed by less suspicious authority than that which proceeds from the pen of a controversialist, I shall conclude by quoting a few sentences from the works of established authors, who, as far as I am aware, were neither clergymen nor Episcopalians. The first shall be from Mr Pinkerton, whose several publications have contributed very much to enlighten the path of the Scottish antiquary. Speaking of the Culdees, he says : " It is clear, from ancient charters, that far from being enemies to Episcopacy, they were the very men who chose the bishops. Doubtless he who expects to find in Scot- land matters not to be found in any neighbouring coun- try, only shews his own credulity; and that, from the fourth century, every Christian country had its bishops, is too well known to be insisted on. When St. Martin first brought monks into Europe about the year 380, their rigid life acquired them high esteem. In a short time the bishops were chiefly chosen from their order : and after- ward, usurping the right of the people, they began to chuse the bishops from among themselves. Hence, in the middle ages, almost every monastery had its bishop, almost every bishopric its monastery. Nay, the abbot or chief of the monastery was sometimes esteemed superior in dignity to the bishop ; that is, in every thing not immediately belong- CX PRELIMINARY DISSERTATION ing to the Episcopal function. Of this the monastery of Hyona, the seminary of Christianity in North Britain, af- fords a noted instance.* The Editor of Sibbald's History of Fife remarks, that Protestant writers seem determined to ascribe to the Cul- dees those characters which they ought to have possess- ed rather than those which they actually acquired. At first they closely followed the regimen of lona : but, in the gradual corruption of the monastic order, they came to marry, to acquire separate property, and to leave their places in the monastery as hereditary estates to their sons : And, like other corrupted monks, they were at last obliged to give way to the canons regular, whom the Popes were forced to institute, in order to correct the depravity of the ancient orders.-f- Mr Chalmers, after giving a full account of " the ori- " ginals, the nature, and the end of the Culdees in North " Britain," observes that, " System has concurred with ignorance in supposing that the Culdees were peculiar to the united kingdom of the Picts and Scots; and actually possessed rights and exercised powers which were inconsistent with the established laws of the uni- versal church in that age. A retrospective view of ec- clesiastical history, from the epoch of the introduction of Christianity into North Britain, would shew, to a dis- cerning eye, that the doctrines, liturgical forms, and the monkish discipline of the Britons, the Irish, the Scots, and the Picts, were extremely similar. J END OF DISSERTATION. * Pinkerton's Inquiry, Vol. II. Part 6. chap. 1. f Sibbald's History of Fife and Kinross. Capar, edit. 1803, p. 186. t Caledonia, Vol I. Book 3. chap. 8. AN HISTORICAL CATALOGUE OF THE SCOTTISH BISHOPS, INTRODUCTION TO THE SEE OF ST ANDREWS. ALL our historians do observe, that some of the relicks of the Apostle St Andrew were brought into Scotland, and that, in process of time, he became its tutelar saint, as we now speak. How the Picts, as well as the Scots, came to bear so great devotion to St Andrew, will be known by looking into the be- ginning of the Second Book of Archbishop Spottiswood, or into the account given of it by Mr Martin, in his Reliquice Dim Andreas^ which, however like to a legend it may appear to be, I shall take the freedom here to transcribe, from a copy that lies in the Advocates Library, Edinburgh. " Regulus, a Greek monk living at Patrae, a city of Achaia, " (by whom the relicks of St Andrew the Apostle were pre- " served and kept,) about the year 370, was warned by a vi- " sion by night, (three nights before the Emperor Constantius " came to the city, with purpose to translate these relicks to " Constantinople,) to go to the shrine in which the relicks were -" kept, and to take out thereof the arm-bone, three fingers of " the right hand, a tooth, and one of the lids of the Apostle's " knees, which he should carefully preserve and carry with " him to a region towards the west, situate in the utmost parts " of the world. Regulus, at first troubled with the strange- " ness of the vision, after a little time resolved to obey. So " putting the relicks in a little box, he went to sea, taking co- " partners with him Damianus a Presbyter, Gelasius and Cu- " baculus two deacons, eight hermits, and three devout vir- " gins, whose names are expressed in sundry ancient records, " says Fordim, lib. II. cap. 59," &c. A 2 INTRODUCTION. " After long storms, the ship was at last driven into the " bay, near the place where the city of St Andrews now " stands, and there split asunder upon the rocks. But Re- " gulus and his company were all brought safe to shore, hav- " ing nothing left them but the relicks, which they were care- " ful above all things to preserve. " Hergustus, king of the Picts, (in whose dominion the " shire of Fife, and all the low country of Scotland then was,) " came to visit them in the place where they had settled (now " St Andrews ;) it was then a forest for wild boars, and was " called in the country language -Muckross, i. e. a land of " boars, from Muck^ a sow, and Ross, a promontory of land " or island. lfc.- " This king changed the name into Kilrimont, [q. d. the " King's Mount,] and gave to Regulus and his company all " the land of that forest, and erected a church, called to this " day St Rule's, or Regulus's Church. Regulus lived here " thirty-two years." The Highlandmen call St Andrews Kil- reide, q. d. Cella Regtdi, or St Regulus's, or Rule's Church. Abernethie was the metropolis both of the kingdom and church of the Picts ; it was situated near the influx of the wa- ter of Earn into the river Tay, and the collegiate church there was dedicated to St Brigida or Bryde, who died at Aberne- thie about the year 518. But Kenneth III. king of Scots, (after his entire victory over the Picts) translated the Episco- pal see to St Andrews, and called it the church of St Andrew ; and the bishop thereof was styled " Maximus Scotorum Epis- copus." Thus this author. -See also Sir Robert Sibbald's printed History of the Shire of Fife, and Mr Maule's MS. De Antiquitate genti-s Scotorum. Adv. Libr. CATALOGUE OF THE BISHOPS OF ST. ANDREWS. The first Fifteen Bishops of this See are so variously related, that the best we can make of them is to satisfy ourselves with a Catalogue of them, according to tlie following Wri- ters, vis. I. FORDUN, according to whom the BISHOPS of ST AN- DEEWS stand thus : 1. FoTHAD, 1 " Primus ut reperi, fuit Fothad, qui ab In- dulfo Rege expulsus fuit, et post expulsionem ab Episcopatu vixit octo annos, de quo sic reperi in circumferentia textus ar- gentei Evangeliorum adhuc in Sto Andrea servati insculptum. " Hanc Evangelii Thecam construxit avitus. " Fothad, qui Scotis primus Episcopus erat. Deinde, " 2. Kellach, post quern, " 3. Malisius, qui octo annos stetit Episcopus. I ste Malisius, ut legitur in vita gloriosi et eximii confessoris beati Duthaci, discipulus fuit beato Duthaco in Hibernia : cui beatus Du- thacus vaticinando futurum Episcopum Scotorum dixit, quod et adimpletum est. Dehinc secundus, " 4. Kellach, Filius Ferdlag, qui fuit primus qui adivit Ro- mam pro confirmatione ; et post confirmationem vixit 25 annis Dehinc successive, " 5. Malmore, " 6. Malisius II. " 7. Aluinus, qui 3 annis stetit Episcopus, 1 Fordun's History. THE SEE OF ST ANDREWS. " 8. Malduinus filius Gillandris, " 9. Tuchald 4 annis, 10. Fothad II. " 11. Gregorius, 12. Cathre, - qui omnes obierunt Electi. " 13. Edmarus et " 14. Godricus, " 15. Turgotus. An. Dotn. 1109. Turgotus Prior Dunel- mensis electus est in translatione Sti Augustini ; et consecra- tus stetit Episcopus fere 7 annis. " 16. Eadmerus. An. Dom. 1117. Eadmundus Cantuariae monachus electus est ; sed, deposita voluntate episcopandi, ad claustrum suum reversus est. Hie tamen in vita Sti Anselmi vocat se Eadmerum, qui etiam dictavit et scripsit vitam Anselmi. " 17. Robertus. A. D. 1122. Electus est Robertus Prior de Scona in Episcopum ad instantiam Regis Alexandri I. et terram, quae Cursus Apri dicitur, quae ab Ecclesia Sti An- dreae ablata fuerat, ex integro restituit, ea conditione, ut inibi constitueretur religio, ut per Regem Alexandrum praaordina- tum fuerat, et per regium equum Arabicum, cum proprio fraeno et sella, opertum pallio grandi et pretioso, cum scuto et lancea argentea, quae nunc est hasta crucis. Quas omnia praecepit rex coram magnatibus terrae, usque ad altare adduci, et de praedictis libertatibus et consuetudinibus regalibus, eccle- siam investiri fecit et saisiri. Quam donationem David frater ejus, tune comes, ibi praesens affirmavit. Consecratus fuit idem a Thurstino Eboracensi Archiepiscopo, sine professione, salva utriusque Ecclesiae dignitate, Apostolicae sedis auctori- tate. Stetit electus per biennium. Consecratus stetit 35 annis ; et sic electus et Episcopus stetit 37 annis. Alibi sic reperi scriptum : stetit electus per biennium, et consecretus stetit 32 annis. Et sic electus et consecratus stetit 34 annis, et obiit A. D. 1159, et sepultus est in antiqua ecclesia Sti An- drese, tempore Malcxjmi regis. 1 " St ANDREWS. II. A CATALOGUE of the Bishops of ST. ANDREWS, according to ANDREW WINTON. 1. Kellauch. 2. Foudauche. 3. Malyss. 4. Kellauch II. 5. Malyss II. 6. Mahnoir. 7. Alwyne. 8. Makdowny Makgillanderis. 9- Tualda. 10. Fotauche. 11. Turgot. 12. Robert. III. CATALOGUE according to Sir JAMES BALFOUR. 1. Sfothad. 2. Kellach I. 3. Kellach II. 4. Malisius. 5. Malisius Albuinus. 6. Malduinus, al. Tuthaldus. 7. Sfo- thad II. 8. Gregorius. 9. Catharus. 10. Edumerus. 11. Godricus. 12. Turgotus. 13. Eduirierus. 14. Robert. IV. CATALOGUE according to VET. CHRON. published by Father INNES. 1. Kellach, 2. Fothach, 3. Maelbrigd,al. Malisius, 4. Cellach,Fil.Ferdulaig, [King Constantine III. . . . .'.King Duff, m the tune of < e [King Culen. [King Culen. V. CATALOGUE according to Archbishop SPOTISWOOD. 1. Hadrianus. 2. Kellach I. 3. Malisius I. 4. Kellach II. son of Ferlegus. 5. Malmore. 6. Malisius II. 7. Al- winus. 8. Malduinus, the son of Gilander. 9. Tuthaldus. 10. Fothadus. 11. Gregorius. 12. Edmundus. 13. Tur- gotus. 14. Godricus. 15. Eadmerus. 16. Robert. So are they ranked in all the printed copies ; but in my MS. of this history, Godrick is set before Turgot. VI. CATALOGUE according to Sir ROBERT SIBBALD. 1 . Adrian, killed by the Danes, was buried in the isle of May, anno 872. 2. Kellach, sat four years, Coostantine III being O THE SEE OF ST ANDREWS. king. 3. Malisius, sat eight years, Gregory the Great being king. 4. Kellach II. son of Ferlegus, sat thirty-five years, anno 904. 5. Malmore. 6. Malisius II. 7. Alwinus, sat three years. 8. Malduin the son of Gilander. 9- Tuthaldus. 10. Fothadus, al. Fodanus, under Malcolm II. consecrated anno 954. 11. Gregorius, sat two years, and died, Malcolm III. being king. 12. Turgot, prior of Durham, sat twenty- five or twenty-six years. 13. Godericus, who anointed King Edgar anno 1093 ; he died 1107. 14. Eadmerus, a monk of Canterbury, King Alexander I. reigning. 15. Robert, prior of Scoon, elected anno 1103, died 1158 ; he founded the priory of St. Andrews. He is sometimes designed " Robertus, Dei gratia, Sti. Andreas humilis minister ;" sometimes " Sti. Andreas Episcopus ;" and sometimes " Scotorum Episcopus." And after the same manner are the undernamed Arnold, Richard, Roger, and William Malvoisin entitled. VII. CATALOGUE according to Mr THOMAS RUDDIMAN. 1. Kellach was bishop before the year 892 or 893 2 , in which year King Gregory died. This bishop held a provin- cial council under King Constantine III. anno 906. When he died is uncertain. 2. Fothad. Nor is it certain what year he came to be bi- shop . but King Indulfus deprived him in the first year of his reign, i. e. anno 952 ; and he died in the first or second year of King Duffus, i. e. A. D. 961 or 962. 3. Malisius, elected some time in the reign of King Duffus, was eight years in the see, and died while Culen was king, about the year 970. 4. Kellach II. the son of Ferdlag, was chosen bishop about the year 971, and confirmed by the Pope. He possessed the see the space of twenty-five years, and died about the year 996. 2 I have added here all along Mr Ruddiman's chronological notes, as be- ing far preferable to any other ; as indeed his learned and excellent criticisms, concerning these first Bishops, are all well worth every man's perusal who under- stands the Latin tongue; for which vid. Prccfat. ad Diplom. et Numisnt. Scotia, p. 19. THE SEE OF ST ANDREWS. 5. Malisius II. and , mr *-n inai from anno 996 till 1031. o, Malmore, ) 7. Alwinus from 1031 to 1034. 8. Maldwin, from 1034 to 1061 . 9. Tuthaldus 3 , from 1061 to 1065. 10. Fothald 4 , from 1065 to 1077. 11. Gregory*,"] 12. Catharus, I Bishops elect, but all of them died before 13. Edmarus, { tne y were consecrated, from the year 14 Godricus, J 1077 to 1107. 15. Turgot was bishop from 1107 to 1115. He was consecrated bishop of St Andrews by Thomas, bishop of York, in the year 1109, and died at Durham the last day of March anno 1115, [Chron. Melros.'] whither he had got liberty to retire for the recovery of his health ; which they say was much impaired, through misunderstandings betwixt the king and him, [Simeon Dunelm.] The see vacant till anno 1120. 16. Eadmerus, a monk of Canterbury in England, was sent for by King Alexander I. and elected bishop anno 1120 ; but because the king would not consent to his conse- cration by the archbishop of Canterbury, he returned back to his own country 5 ; though another authority says, he 3 In the Register of the Priory of St Andrews, this bishop is named Tuadal. 4> And this bishop is there named Modath, the son of Malmykal. But I chuse to set down here the words of the Register: " Malduinus Episcopns Sti. " Andrea? contulit ecclesiam de Markinch, cum tola terra, honorifice et devote, " Deo et Sancto Servano, et Keledeis de insula XiOchlevin, cum praefata libertate " fqualem sciz. libri compilator supra descripserat, says Mr Ruddiman.] Tuadal " Episcopus Sti Andreae contulit ecclesiam de Sconyn praefatis \iris religiosis, de- " vote et integre, cum omni libertate et honore pro suffragiis orationum. Item " Modath films Malmykcll, vir piissimas recordationis, Episcopus Sti Andreae, cu- " jus vita et doctrina tota regio Scotorum feliciter est illustrata, contulit Deo et " S. Scrvano, et Keledeis heremitis apud jusulam Lochlevin, in schola virtutum, " ibidem degentibus, devote et honorifice, et ecclesiam de Hurkendorath," &c. * Gregory is bishop about 1115, as appears from his name being in the charter of Alex. I. to the abbey of Scone ; in which he isnot called Elcctus, but Episcopus. 5 See a large account of this afikir, as written by Eadmerus himself, in his Jlistoria Novorum, and published by Mr Selden, B. 5. p. 130, &c. 8 THE SEE OF ST ANDREWS. was consecrated bishop of this see anno 1120. [Chron. Melros.]* 17. Robert, prior of Scone, was elected in the year 1122, but not consecrated till 1128, (if we can give credit to the continuator of Florentius Vigorniensis,) by Thurstin, arch- bishop of York, though without any profession of subjection to that see ; 6 yet our own historian Fordun says, that he was consecrated two years after his election, that is, anno 1125. But Sir James Dairy mple is of opinion, that this bishop's consecration has been in the year 1126, and plainly shews that it has not been later than 1127- 7 He died anno 1159. 8 N. B. As after this Robert there is little or no variance in the several lists of the bishops of this see by the different writers, I shall now proceed in a regular catalogue, begin- ning at him. BISHOP ROBERT, then, was an Englishman born ; he had been first a Canon Sti Oswaldi de Nostellis, near to the town of Pontefract in Yorkshire, and was brought with five others of that nation into Scotland by King Alexander I. in order both to instruct his people, and to be good examples to them in the observance of the monastic rules prescribed by St Augustine. He was made prior of Scone anno 1115, and in the year 1122 became bishop elect of this see, though he did not obtain consecration during the reign of this king. However, in the succeeding reign of David I. (ordinarly cal- led St David,) he was consecrated in the year 1126-7, "f" * Eadmer is not mentioned by Wynton among the bishops of St Andrews. 6 See the charter of our King David I. recorded in the Monasticon Angli- canum concerning this Bishop's consecration by Thurstin archbishop of York : And Anglia Sacra, V. II. p. 237. 7 Vid. Dalryrople's Collections, p. 250. 8 See a Carta by this bishop among the papers belonging to the cathedral church of Durham, anno 1127 ; and another in the year 1150, in the Lawyers' Library, Edinburgh. f Not till 1128, according to Lord Hailes. THE SEE OF ST ANDREWS. 9 (Sir James Dalrymple's Collections, p. 250.] This bishop founded the priory of St Andrews, and obtained from the king the old Culdean priory of Lochleven to be annexed to his new foundation ; which thing proved an occasion of much dispute, not only betwixt the Culdees and him, but for a long time thereafter. Here is a copy of the royal donation. *' David rex Scotorum, episcopis, abbatibus, comitibus, " vicecomitibus, et omnibus probis hominibus totius terrae " suae salutem : Sciatis, me concessisse et dedisse canonicis " Sti Andreas insulam de Lochleven, ut ipsi ibi instituant " ordinem canonicalem, et Kaledei, qui ibidem invent! fuer- " int, si regulariter vivere voluerint, in pace cum eis, et sub " eis, maneant. Et si quis illorum ad hoc resistere voluerit, " volo et praecipio ut ab insula ejiciatur. Testibus Roberto " episcopo Sti Andreae, Andrea episcopo de Kateness, Wal- " tero cancellario, Nicholao clerico, Hugone de Morevilla, " Waltero filio Alani, apud Bervic."* By this charter we see, that Robert is bishop here under King David I. and Robert is also elect here in his time, [Cart. Dunferml.~\ He is often mentioned as Bishop here in the same reign, [Cart. Dunferml. et Glasg. item Diplomata et Numismata, 1150, Florent. Vigorn. 1128.] Robert was bishop here under King Malcolm, [Cart. Neicbottle, et Cart. DiinfermL] and in the time of Pope Adrian IV. [Nicol- son's Hist. Libr. p. 358.] This bishop must have lived a considerable space, if it be true, according to the Chronicle of Melrose, that he died in this see anno 1159- But Chron. S. Crucis Edinburgensis says, anno 1158, " obiit bonae memoriae Robertus episcopus " Sti Andrae." WALTER, Elect. After the death of Robert, it is reported, that one Walthemius, or Walter, by- Fordun named Sanc- * In the Register of St Andrews, Mac. Trans, p. 44* is to be found the original grunt of the island of Lochleven by Bishop Robert, and appended to it a curious inventory of the books of the Culdean monastery. See Note A. in the Appendix. 10 THE SEE OF ST ANDREWS. tus Valthenus, abbot of Melrose, and brother of the half- blood to King David, (as some say,) was elected bishop of this see ; but that he could not be prevailed with to accept the charge, loving rather to remain in his quiet retirement. And so, . ARNOLD, 1158-9- ] Ernald, al. Arnold, abbot of Kelso, came to be consecrated bishop here in the year 1158, [Chron. S. Cruets.] But Chron. Melro-s. places his election in the year 1160 ; as likewise doth Fordun. The consecration was performed within the church of St Andrews, by William bishop of Moray, the Pope's legate, in the presence of King Malcolm IV. called the Maiden, I0 and of the bishops, ab- bots, and princes of the land, \Chron. Melr^\ This bishop was himself legate in Scotland for Pope Eugenius III. u He founded the cathedral of St Andrews, but died while the work was scarcely begun, in the middle of September, anno 1162, [Chron. S. Crucis.] He was bishop under King Malcolm, [Cart. Newhotile et Dunferml.] and, as Fordun narrates that he continued bishop only one year ten months and seventeen days, therefore his consecration must have been in the year 1160, contrary to the Chron. S. Crucis, which, however, is right enough as to the time of his death. 12 Sir Robert Sibbald, p. 95 of his History of Fife^ gives a charter by King Malcolm IV. in the seventh year of his 9 Waltherus or Walderus, abbot of Melross, elect of St Andrew's, was son to Simon de St Liz, by Matilda his wife, daughter and heiress to Walderus Earl of Huntingdon, who afterwards married Prince David, who succeeded his brother Alexander I. in the kingdom of Scotland ; so that Walderus the elect bishop was step-son only to King David, and uterine brother to Prince Henry. 10 This king is universally said to have died a virgin ; and yet, in a donation of his to the abbey of Kelso there is this remarkable clause : " Preecipio etiam ut " pradicta ecclesia de Inverlalhan in qua prima nocte corpus filii mei post obituni " suum quievit." [Vid. Account of Religious Houses, p. 44L] 11 Though, our historians say, Eugenius III. yet chronology requires it to have been Alexander III. at least this last waj certainly Pope during the time that Ernald was bishop here. 12 Vid, Dalrymple's Collect, p. 427. THE SEE OF ST ANDREWS. 11 reign, i. e. A. D. 1160, in which the first of the many wit- nesses is Ernesto episcopo Sti Andreae ; and as this coincides with the first year of Ernald, may it not be rationally suppos- ed, that this has been one and the same person, sometimes called Ernald, and at another time Ernest.* But then, see- ing the same author, p. 102, tells us, that he has found Ernestus to be bishop of St Andrews, both in the fifth and seventh of King Malcolm IV. may it not equally be suppos- ed, that there has been another Bishop Ernest in this see before Arnold, for the space of two years, viz. from anno 1158 to anno 1160. Time, the parent of truth, may possi- bly clear up this point. This Bishop Ernald grants a char- ter of confirmation of King Malcolm IV. his gift to the ab- bey of Cupar, which I have been told is now in the family of Balmerino. RICHARD, 1163.] 13 Richard, chaplain to King Malcolm IV. elected to this see anno 1163. He was elect of St Andrews at the time when Herbert was bishop of Glasgow, also when Andrew was bishop of Caithness, and Sams bishop of Brechin, [Cart. Cambusk.] He is elect of St Andrews in the time of Malcolm IV. [ibidem.] He is both elect and bishop in the same reign, [Cart. Glasg.] and bishop under this king, [Diplom. et Numism.} and bishop under King William, [i&id.] He is a witness with Nicholas chancellor of the kingdom, (who was in this high office * There is no doubt that Ernald or Arnold was the name of this bishop. 13 I suppose it may not be unacceptable to some readers, that 1 set down here the witnesses to a charter of King Malcolm IV. to the abbey of Scone : They are, William, brother to the king ; Richard elect of St Andrew's ; Gregory, An- drew, Gregory, bishops of Dunkeld, Caithness, and Ross; Galfrid, William, Osbert, Alfrid, abbots of Dunfermline, Melross, Jedburgh and Stirline, [alias Cambuskenneth ;] Walter, prior of St Andrews; Engelram the chancellor; Wal- ter, son of Alan the Stewart ; Richard Morville the constable ; Nicolas the cham- berlain ; Matthew the archdeacon ; Hurl Duncan ; Gilbride, Earl of Angus ; Malcolm, Earl of Athol ; Gilchrist, Earl of Menteith ; Gilbert, the son of Earl Terteth ; Merlswain ; Adam, the son of the Earl of Angus, &c. at Slirline, in the eleventh, (. e. the lost,) year of the king. [Cart. Scon.] ' 12 THE SEE OF ST ANDREWS. from anno 1165 till anno 1171,) [Cart. Newbottl.] He had been sent into Normandy to negotiate our King William's redemption with Henry II. king of England, in the month of December 1175. He was bishop here 1177, [Cart. Kelso.] He mentions his predecessors Robert and Ernald, bishops, [Cart. Scone.'] Richard was consecrated, anno " 1165, apud " Sanctum Andream in Scotia ab episcopis ejusdem terrae," [Chron. Melros.] He stiles himself, " Dei gratia ecclesiae Sti *' Andreas humilis minister,"" and he says, " tempore David " Regis bonae memoriae, et Robert! episcopi, et episcopi Ar- " noldi antecessorum nostrorum,'^ Cart. Cambusk.] (pretty clear instructions that he himself was the third bishop from Robert, contrary to what was above supposed with respect to Ernest and Ernald.) King William also confirms his dona- tion to the abbey of Cambuskenneth, then designed the abbey of Stirling, [efo'd] " Electus an. Dom. 1165, et consecratus " apud S. Andream ab episcopis regni, dominica in Ramis " Palmarum, 5to sciz. Kal. Aprilis, astante Rege. Electus " stetit per biennium, et confirmatus 12 annis et uno mense, " et tertio Non. Maii obiit in infirmitorio canonicorum," [For- dun.] He died anno 1173.* JOHN and HUGH, 1178.] After this ensued the double election and consecration of John and Hew, al. Hugo, into the see of St Andrews, the account whereof may be seen at large in the English Writer Hoveden. Oui* own historian Fordun tells, that after the death of Bishop Richard, the same year, viz. 1177, John Scott, an Englishman, but archdeacon of St Andrews, was unanimously elected bishop, but that the king (William) opposed him, and caused his chaplain (Hugo) to be consecrated. John went to Rome, and the Pope (Alex- ander III.) sent him home with a nuncio, who made Matthew, bishop of Aberdeen, to consecrate John in the abbey of Holy- roodhouse ; but, as the king continued inflexible, John went a second time to Rome, and lived full seven years in volun- * Hoveden, f. 541, places his death in 1180, but it is clear, from the following section, that it ought to be 1177. THE SEE OF ST ANDREWS. 13 tary banishment there ; and when the Pope was going to in- terdict the kingdom of Scotland, John prevailed with him to de- sist. The see of Dunkeld happening at last to fall void, the king willingly agreed that John should be placed in it, and of his own accord called him home, and received him very graciously. Thus Fordun. This Hugo makes mention of Robert, Er- nald, and Richard, his antecessors, [Cart. Scon.] He is bishop of St Andrews in the reign of King William, [Chart. Dunfcrl. Item, Writs family of Errcl.Item, Cart. Cam- busk, et Cart. Kelso.~\ He died an. 1187, [Chron. S. Cruets.'] but Fordun says, " an. 1188, pridie Non. Aug.' 1 And this au- thor, after informing us that John, bishop of Dunkeld, died a monk at Newbottle, adds, " Dictus vero dominus Hugo, " accessor ejus ad episcopatum Sti Andrea?, stetit ibi Epis- " copus decem annis et totidem mensibus ; qui cum pro ipsa " causa inter ipsum et Joannem Dunkeldensem sedeni Ronia- " nam adiret, et in favorem domini Papae acceptus, et de in- " trusione ad episcopatum absolutus, sexto milliario cis ur- " bem niortuus est pridie Nonas Augusti, an. Dom. 1188." So it appears, that, being conscious of intrusion into the see of St Andrews, he undertook a journey to Rome, and did re- ceive absolution from the Pope, and died when he was about six miles out of the city of Rome upon his return home, " prid. Non. Aug. 1188."* ROGER, 1188.] Roger, son of Robert III. Earl of Liecester after the Conquest, by Petronilla, daughter of the Lord High Steward of England. 14 Mr Crawford observes, in his Lives of the Chancellors, that his father having early discovered in his son a genius for learning, dedicated him to the service of * In the Register of the Priory of St Andrew's, Macf. Trans, p. 46, we find, " Carta Hugonis Episcopi de Dimid Marcae de Molendino de Dervisin." No date, bat witnessed thus : " Goulino Archidiacono, Andrea Persona de Symingham, " Willieliuo Persona de .Lintown, Alexandra Persona de Fogrand, liugoue Se- " neicallo Episcopi, Willielmo Persona de Dervisin." 14 Knygthton inter decem scriptores, and Dugdale's Baronage. 14 THE SEE OF ST ANDREWS. Almighty God in the church ; and his cousin, William, king of Scotland, preferred him to be lord high chancellor here in the year 1178 ; for our chancellors in these early times were generally men of the church. [See their Lives.] At last the see of St Andrews falling vacant, he was made bishop there ; but (whatever might be the reason) he was not conse- crated till the first Sunday of Lent, anno 1198*, [Chron. Melr. et Ford.] and the office was performed by Richard, bishop of Moray.-f- Roger is witness to the king's foundation- charter of the abbey of Inchaffray in Strathearn, the 35th year of the king, an. Dom. 1200 ; and the co-witnesses are John, bishop of Dunkeld, Jonathan, bishop of Dumblain, Sec. Vide Roger was elect here in the time of Matthew, bishop of Aberdeen, [Cart. Aberbr] and he is witness to King Wil- liam's erection of the monastery of Aberbrothock, (commonly Arbroath,) [Cart. Cambusk.] He stiles himself " Scotorum " Episcopus." He was bishop here in the year 1201, [Cart. Kels.] and, in the said cartulary, the preceding bishops are ranked thus : viz. Robert, Ernald, Richard, Hugo, and Roger, in a charter of confirmation to the monastery of Kelso, of all privileges, &c. granted by these bishops. Roger, F. F. M. R. R. et R. were bishops of St Andrews, Glasgow, Dun- keld, Aberdeen, Moray, Ross, and elect of Brichen, in the first year of Prince Alexander, son to King William, [Cart. Aberbr.~\ R. is bishop of St Andrews in the time of King William, and Richard, bishop of Moray, is a co-witness with him ; and as John was certainly bishop of Dunkeld, and Richard bishop of Moray, in his time, there is no doubt but the letter R. bishop of St Andrews, stands for Roger in No. 25. [Append. Officers of State.] He died at Cambuskenneth, Non. Jul. 1202, and was interred in the church of St Rule, * There is in the chartnlary of the Priory of St Andrews, p. 47, a charter by this bishop, when only bishop elect, of the lands of Duff Cupiz. It has no date, but must have been granted between 1188 and 1198. f Ilovedcu says, by Matthew bishop of Aberdeen. THE SEE OF ST ANDREWS. 15 Char. Cambusk. et Mel.] He wrote " Serraones varies in " Ecclesiast."" [Dempster ,-] and Mr Martine says, that this bishop first built the castle of St Andrews, about the year 1200. WILLIAM MALVOISINE, 1202.] William Malvoisine, des- cended of a good family, went in his youth to France, where he li ved a considerable time, and upon that account has been by some called a Frenchman, [Mackenzie^ Lives.] Several writers are positive as to this, and ex- pressly mention a journey he made into France to visit his relations. However, it is noway certain that he was a native Frenchman, as this surname came to Britain alongst with William the Conqueror, an. 1066, and several of them are to be met with in the records of England and Scotland before this prelate's time. He became one of the clerici regis, and archdeacon of St Andrews, [Cart. Aberbr.] He was pre- ferred to be lord chancellor, 6to Idus Sept. 1199, [Ch. Melr.] and the same year was elected bishop of Glasgow, and con- secrated an. 1200, but was translated thence to the see of St Andrews an. 1202, [z'fo'rf.] which he possessed to his death, an. 1233. It is said, that he both christened and crowned King Alexander II. and that he founded the hospital of Lochleven called Scotland-well, and brought several sects of new friars out of France. He was bishop here an. 1204, [Writs Church of Durham,] and an. 1212, [C. Dumferl.] He went to a general council in Rome, an. 1215, and returned an. 1218, and with him went the bishops of Glasgow and Moray, and Henry, abbot of Kelso, [Chron Melros.] " William miseratione di- vina Episcopus Sti Andreae humilis minister,"" makes a morti- fication for the soul of King William about the ninth year of King Alexander II. [C. Cambusk.] He was bishop here in the tenth year of the reign of King Alexander II. [Cart. Mor.] and cotemporary with Walter, bishop of Glasgow, [Cart. Glasg.] He was bishop here an. 1234 and an. 1237, and cotemporary with Pope Honorius, and 16 THE SEE OF ST ANDREWS. with Sayerus de Quincy, [Cart. DumferL] 15 He was also, in the 30th year of King Alexander, and in the time of William Frazer, chancellor, and of Robert, bishop of Glas- gow, [5idL] He wrote the lives of St Ninian and St Kenti- gern, [Dempster.] 1G He died at his palace of Inch-Murdach, al. Inch-Martine, 15th July 1233. Sir James Dalrymple says, that he saw a seal of this bishop appended to an inden- ture in the year 1237. l7 After the death of William, botli clergy and laity were desirous to have GALFRID, bishop of Dunkeld, placed in the see of St Andrews ; but the king not consenting to his translation, DAVID, 1233.] One David, whose surname is variously ex- pressed, (some writing it Benham, others Bernham and Ber- tram,) 18 great chamberlain to the king, was consecrated 15 William Malvoisine was not cotemporary with William Frazer, chancellor, nor with Robert, bishop of Glasgow, nor did he live in the 30th year of any of the Alexanders ; the William here meant, therefore, must be William Wishart, to whom all these three characters agree. 16 In the Cartulary of Paisley there is a charter of confirmation by William bishop of St Andrews, which bears these words, " Noveritis nos divinae charitatis " intuitu, ad exemplar felicis recordationis Willielmi praedecessoris nostri, con- " cessisse," fitc. And after this, in the Cartulary, follows another confirmation of the same subjects, by David bishop of St Andrews, in the year 1247. Now Da- vid was indeed bishop of this see at this time, and was successor of Bishop Wil- liam Malvoisin ; but it don't appear as yet, that this Bishop Malvoisin had a pre- decessor in the see of the name William, as this charter would insinuate. And, N. B. That the witnesses to Bishop William are, William Eglishem, arch- deacon of Londiern. 17 Bishop Malvicine had got from the Pope a legatine power, with a view to promote an expedition into the Holy Land. And, after his return from France, having assumed Walter, bishop of Glasgow, into the same office, they two held a council at Perth, where were present many noble persons, & c. to set forward the undertaking. Yet the writer observes, that few only of the richer sort were in love with it. [Fordun. L,ib. 8. c. 78.] 18 His real surname was Bernham, he was born in the town of Berwick ; and descended of an ancient family of burgesses there. In the Chartulary of the Priory of St Andrews he is designed Camerarius Scotiae, and mentioned alongst with his brother, " Robertus Bernham, burgensis de Berwick," who is probably the same person who was afterwards major of Berwick, anno 121.9. [Nicolson, Border 2 THE SEE OF ST ANDREWS. 17 bishop here on St Vincent's day, (22d January) an. 1233, by William, Gilbert, and Clement, bishops of Glasgow, Caith- ness, and Dumblane, with whom therefore he was cotemporary, as also with Galfrid and Clement, bishops of Dunkeld and Dumblane, and in the time of King Alexander II. [Cart. Bal- mer.] He was bishop here an. 1240, [ibid, et Cart. Kels.~\ and an. 1242, [Cart. Camb. et Glasg.~\ in which year he held a provincial council at Perth, the king himself and se- veral of the nobility assisting therein. He was bishop an. 1247, [Cart. Kels.] He performed the ceremony of anoint- ing King Alexander III. at Scone. He was bishop an. 1250 and 1251, [Cart. Kels. Camb. et Glasg.~\ He stiles him- self " Permissione divina ecclesiae Sti Andreae humilis minis- " ter." Fordun says, he governed the see thirteen years three months and nine days, and that he died at Northampton 6to Idus Mail 1253, and was buried in the abbey church of Kelso, [Melros.] But if this bishop did not die till the year 1253, he has certainly sat longer in the see. The time of his death is better fixed by the occasion of his journey into Eng- land, viz. the marriage of King Alexander III. with Mar- garet, the daughter of King Henry III. of England, at which time he fell into a fever and died. The greatest confusion in the list of the bishops of this see is about this time ; for some tell us that the voice of the prior and of the canons were all in favour of Robert Sitteville, dean of the see of Dunkeld, but that one ABEL, [1253,] formerly a canon of the church of Glasgow, and now arch- dean of St Andrews, having procured a mandate from the court for the canons to proceed to a new election, which they refused to comply with, Abel posted away to Rome, and by bribes got himself consecrated there by Pope Innocent IV. The chronicle of Melrose observes, that Robert, prior of St Andrews, sent a representation of this affair to the Pope, as Laws.] He died Kal. Gto Mail, not at Northampton, but at Narthanshire or Narthasliire, now Nevvthorn in vie. de Btrwic, and was buried in Kelso, [For- dun, Vol. I. p. 559, Edit. Edinb, Macfarlane, and also Edit. 1759.] 18 THE SEE OF ST ANDREWS. did the king on the other part by Mr Abel, and that Abel, when at Rome, procured himself to be consecrated ; that, upon his return home, the king, after some displeasure shewn, received him honourably enough, and that he died in the year 1254. And Fordun takes notice, that the chapter and he disagreeing, he died of grief in the year 1254, after he had sat only ten months ; and Mr Winton says, he was bishop scarcely half-a-year. Others, again, make no mention at all of any such bishop as Abel ; but I have seen in the cartulary of Glasgow, A. designed bishop of St Andrews in the 23d year of King Alexander II. i. e. an. 1237. However, to re- concile these things I cannot pretend to take upon me. GAMELINE, 1255.] Gameline was one of the clerici reg'is Alexandri II. and archdeacon of St Andrews, and was made lord chancellor in the year 1250, [Chron. MelrosJ\ which adds, that he was elected bishop of this see, not by the Culdees, (who were deprived of voting at this election,) but by the prior and convent of St Andrews, and that his election was approven by the king and his council. We find Game- line elect of St Andrews in the year 1255, on St Thomas- day, [Cart. DumfcrL] and he was consecrated on St Stephen's day in the same year, upon a warrant from the Pope to Bishop William Bondington of Glasgow, [Spottiswood.] This bishop was a man of good repute, but became disagreeable to the court because he would not relax a soldier of the king's, whom he had excommunicated, without previous satisfaction ; and the chronicle of Melrose relates, how that this bishop was banished by the king's councillors, both because he would not give his consent to their bad advices, and because he would not advance a sum of money for the purchase of the bishopric ; that, having been denied a passage through England, 19 he sailed into France, from whence he went to Rome to plead his cause before the Pope, in which mean- time his enemies seized on all his goods. But the Pope gave 19 Vid. Rymer ad 22 Jan. 1257. " De Episcopi Sancti Andreze Scotiae arres- " Undo. Rex. &c. [Anglite.] Quia Magister Gamclinus cp. St, And. Sco. qnredam THE SEE OF ST ANDREWS. 19 sentence in his behalf, an. 1257. After that his accusers were likewise present. G. is bishop here an. 1258, [Rymer.~\ Bishop Gameline is witness to King Alexander III. in a char- ter of the lands of Tillicultrie to William, Earl of Mar, an. reg. 14. [Writs of the Family of Mar.] He was bishop an. 1266, [Cart. Kels. et Scone.} Item, an. 1270, [C. Kels.~\ and an. 1271, [Account of Religious Houses in Scotland, p. 515;] in which year, 1271, he died at Inchmurdach of the palsy, [Fordun.~\ WILLIAM WISEHEART, 1272.] William Wiseheart, al. Wishart, of the family of Pitarrow in the Mearns, was arch- deacon of St Andrews, and then chancellor of the kingdom, an. 1256, [Reliq. St. Kentiger.} and an. 1261, [Ch. ofTilli- cultries, above cited, C. Mar.] In the year 1268 he was elect of Glasgow, after th e death of Bishop Cheyn, but, before his consecration, he was postulated 2o also to the see of St An- drews, upon the death of Bishop Gameline ; but, by reason of a schism in the papacy, he was not, they say, consecrated until the year 1273, at Scone, [Fordun,] in presence of the king and many of the nobility ; and we are told that this pre- late did at that time resign the office of chancellor. At his election or postulation, the ancient Culdees were not allowed to vote. He was bishop in the year 1273, [Account of Reli- gious Houses,, p. 493.] In his time Bagamont, the Pope's " impctrarit ad curiam Ronianam in exhjEi edationem dilecti filii et fidelis nostri " Alexamlri Regis Scotise i'llustris, qui filiani nostrum duxit in uxorem, non sine " nostro et ipsius Regis scandalo et dedecore manifesto, propter quod sustincrc " nolumus quod regnum nostrum ingrediatur," 8cc. Vid. etiam ibid. A complaint by the Pope to the king of England against the king of Scotland, for encroach- ing upon the rights of the church and of churchmen. 20 A bishop is said to be postulated \\hcii he has been already in possession, or is only elect of another see. For the Canon law supposes that a bishop is mar- ried to his diocese, and so cannot be elected into another. However, it allows a bishop already in possession, or only elected into a see, to be postulated by an- other, and that such bishop may be removed or translated to the other see ; only the word advanced or -promoted must not be used, [See Archbishop Chichely's lafe, p. 37.] Another sense of the word postulation is, when two-thirds of the Totes do agree in the election. B 2 20 THE SEE OF ST ANDREWS. legate, came into Scotland, and made a list of all the benefices. In the year 1274, he went to the general council held at Lyons by Pope Gregory X. and after his return did not live long ; for having been employed in a commission to the Bor- ders to treat with the English, he died at Marbottle in Teviot- dale, 5to Kal. Jun. 1279, [Fordun,] with the reputation of a truly good and virtuous man. He rebuilt in a stately manner the west end of the cathedral, which had been blown down by a tempest of wind. WILLIAM FRAZER, 1279.] -William Frazer, a son of the Frazers of Oliver Castle in the shire of Tweeddale, who was formerly dean of Glasgow, and rector of Cadziow, (now Ha- milton,) [Fordun.'] He became lord chancellor, upon the resignation of that office by the last bishop, and after his death was advanced to the same see, to which he was elected pridieNon. Aug. 1279, " exclusis Kelediis sicut in electione prae- cedenti," and was consecrated at Rome by Pope Nicholas III. 14 Kal. Jun. anno 1280, [Fordun.} He was lord chan- cellor and witness to King Alexander III. an. reg. 31. i. e. A. D. 1280, about which time he resigned the chancellor's office. He was bishop here an. 1280, [Cart. Cambusk.] also anno 1286 and anno 1288, [Durham Writs,] and anno 1295, [ibid, and Cart. Cambusk.] Upon the deplorable death of King Alexander III. an. 1288, he was chosen to be one of the regents of the kingdom, \Rymer ;~\ and after the death of the infant Queen Margaret, he, as most of this nation did, yielded a forced submission to Edward I. of England. King John Baliol sent this bishop, together with three other per- sons, into France, to treat about a marriage for his son, Prince Edward, anno 1295, [Dipl. et Numism. c. 42.] but whether ever he returned home again seems to be uncertain, since it is related, that having retired into France, that he might not be an eye-witness to the calamities of his country, he fell into a languishing distemper, and died at Arteville, 13 Kal. Septembris, 1297, [Fordun.~\ His body was buried in the church of the Friars Predicants in Paris, but his heart, THE SEE OF ST ANDREWS. 21 inclosed in a very rich box, was afterwards brought over into Scotland, by his immediate successor,- Bishop Lamberton, and entombed in the wall of the cathedral church of St Andrews, near to the tomb of Bishop Gameline. He is said to have been a person of great worth, and would have performed many good works had he happened to live in peaceable times. WILLIAM LAMBERTOX, 1298.] William Lamberton, par- son of Campsey and chancellor of the diocese of Glasgow, [Fordun,] called William de Lambyrton, [Cliart. Glaisg.] He was chancellor of that church anno 1292, had a long dispute with the Culdees, who pretended a right from ancient times to elect the bishop of St Andrews ; but the Pope decided the matter against the Culdees, who after this time came to be entirely suppressed ; for there is no more to be heard either of themselves, or of any struggle they made thereafter at the election of a bishop. At this time, we are told, William Cumin, their Praepositus, went in person to Rome, and debat- ed their cause before Pope Boniface VIII. though to no pur- pose ; for the Pope consecrated the elect on the first day of June 1298. And Fordun adds, " Et notandum est, quod " jurisdictio sedis, ipsa vacante, penes capitulum totaliter re- " mansit. Quam quidem jurisdictionem, magister Nicolaus " de Balmy le, officialis curia? Sti Andrea?, per ejusdem loci " capitulum constitutus per totam diocesin exequebatur effica- " citer nomine capituli." In the reign of King David, it would indeed appear, that the Culdees were either the chap- ter, or had some share in the election of the bishop : and see- ing all their differences with the bishops of St Andrews was concerning the right of election, it would seem to be a just enough conclusion that these Culdees were not of a different form of religion from the bishops of St Andrews, nor did ob- serve any rites or ceremonies different from the church in those days. The whole contest being about the right of elec- tion of the bishop, is likewise a plain proof that the Culdees did not maintain a parity among themselves, in the govern- ment of ecclesiastical affairs, distinct from what was then es- 22 THE SEE OF ST ANDREWS. tablished in the Christian church. The canons of St Andrews seem to have been superinduced upon the Culdees in the time of King David, in the matter of electing the bishop of that see ; and against this they complained, but never against the office of a bishop, so far as we can learn by any remains of antiquity. The sole contest was, who should or who should not elect the bishop. This Bishop Lamberton is to be met with in many ancient writs. He calls himself " Willielmus de Lamberton, miseratione divina, Sti Andreas episcopus, anno 1300 ;" and he makes mention of " literas Willielmi Frazer praedecessoris nostri,"" [Cart. Cambusk.] He is found bishop in the same year, [Cart. Dunjerm.] an. 1304, [Cart. Arbro.] anno 1309, and the ninth year of King Robert I. [DurJiam MS. fl ] an. 2<*o, 13tio, 1510 R b. I. [Cart. Aberd. et Dunferm.] He is witness to King Robert I. an. reg. 7 mo et 17 mo , [Hay.'] He is bishop an. 1323, [Cart. Duni praecepimus, TESTIBUS, Sic. Apucl Whytehall, 29 no 60 THE SEE OF EDINBURGH. die Septembris, anno Domini 1633, et anno regni nos- troO 00 - N. B. The prior of St Andrews was vicar-general of St Andrews, " sede vacante." [Cart. Cambusk.] And, " jurisdietio sedis, ipsa vacante, penes capitulum " totaliter remansit."" [Fordun.] BISHOPS OF EDINBURGH. 1. THE first Bishop of Edinburgh was WILLIAM FOR- BES, son of Thomas Forbes of the family of Corsindae, by a sister of the famous Mr James Cargill, Doctor of Medicine at Aberdeen, in which city likewise this worthy person was born, and bred at schools and the University. About the age of twenty years he went abroad for his improvement, visiting the several places most noted for learning in Eng- land, Germany, and Holland. He returned home after five years, and became minister first at Alford and next at Mo- nimusk, both in the shire of Aberdeen. He was afterwards one of the ministers of Aberdeen, and principal of the Ma- rischal college in that city ; and, last of all, he was for some- time a minister in Edinburgh. When King Charles I. was in Scotland, anno 1633, and hearing this great man preach before him, he had such a due regard for his excellent parts and talents that way, and for his knowledge in all matters theological, that when his Majesty erected the Episcopal see of Edinburgh, and consultation was held concerning a fit person to be promoted to this see, the king was pleased to say, he had found a man who deserved to have a see erected for him, meaning Mr Forbes. His patent from the king, to be the first bishop of Edinburgh, bears date the 26th THE SEE OF EDINBURGH. 61 January 1634, and he died that same year on the first day of April following, [ Vita Jok. Forbcxii a Corse.'} A person he was endued most eminently with all Christian virtues, insomuch, that a very worthy man, Robert Burnet, Lord Crimond, a Judge of the Session, said of our prelate, that he never saw him but he thought his heart was in heaven ; and that he was never alone with him but he felt within himself a commentary on these words of the Apostle: " Did " not our hearts burn within us, while he yet talked with " us, and opened to us the Scriptures ?" [Prcf. Life of Bishop Bedel.'] During the time he was principal at Aber- deen, he had interspersed several things among his acade- mical prelections, tending to create peace among the con- tending parties of Christianity, some notes whereof were published above twenty years after his death, under the tide of " Considerations modestae et pacificae," &c. This prelate had written elaborate animadversions on the four tomes of Bellarmine which were then published at Paris ; but these having fallen to the care of Dr Robert Baron, our prelate's fellow presbyter, while at Aberdeen, were lost with other books of this other great man, when he was forced, by the then prevailing faction, to fly out of this kingdom into England. Bishop Forbes had been twenty years in the exercise of the holy ministry before he was put into the see of Edinburgh, where he only appeared long enough to be known, but not long enough to do what might have been expected. [Ibid.] 2. DAVID LINDESAY, then bishop of Brechin, was trans- lated to the see of Edinburgh, 17th September 1634. The fury of the mob was like to have fallen heavy on this prelate, at the first reading of the Liturgy in the High Church of Edinburgh, on Sunday the 23d July 1637- He was de- posed and excommunicated by the Assembly 1638 ; where- upon he withdrew into England, where he died during the following troubles. [See the Bishops of Brechin.] 62 THE SEE OF EDINBURGH. 3. GEORGE WISEHEART, of the family of Logy in Angus, was minister at North Leith, and deposed anno 1638, for refusing to take the covenant. Some correspondence having been afterwards discovered betwixt him and the royalists, he was plundered of all his goods oftener than once, and thrown prisoner into the nastiest part of the tolbooth of Edinburgh, called the Thieves-hole; being delivered thence, he went beyond sea, and accompanied the Marquis of Mon- trose in foreign parts in quality of his chaplain ; then, after the fall of that illustrious person, he became chaplain to Elizabeth queen of Bohemia, sister to King Charles I. with whom he came over into England, anno 1660, to visit her royal nephew, King Charles II. after his Majesty's happy restoration. Soon after which Mr Wiseheart had the rec- tory of Newcastle-upon-Tyne conferred upon him, where he was held in great veneration for his unspotted loyalty. Upon the restoring of Episcopacy within Scotland, he was preferred to the see of Edinburgh, into which he was con- secrated, 1st June 1662, at St Andrews, where he conti- nued till death took him away, anno 1671, and was buried in the abbey-church of Holyroodhouse, under a magnificent tomb, with this inscription upon it : " Hie recubat Celebris Doctor Sophocardius alter, Entheus ille S as was likewise the manner afterwards of the church of St Regulus, now St Andrews, This mo- nastery St David, king of Scots, changed into a cathedral church about the year 1127, and expelled the Culdees, and placed one Gregory, who had been the abbot of the monastery, to be bishop of this new see. This bishop ob- tained from Pope Alexander III. an apostolical protection and confirmation, both for himself and the new see, in most ample form. Though it might reasonably be expected that Abbot Mill would have given us a right exact series of the bishops of this see, yet, upon perusal, we find the case to be very far otherwise, there being no greater confusion to be met with in any other of the Episcopal sees. GREGORY, 1169.] Gregory, he was bishop here in the time of King David I. [Dalrymple's Collections, p. 247 * Now printed by the JBallantyne Club. 74 THE SEE OF DUNKELD. and 387 : It. Diplom. et Numism. p. 59-] Gregory is bi- shop here contemporary with Herbert elect of Glasgow, [Cart. Cambusk.] G. is bishop of Dunkeld contempo- rary with King David, Robert elect of St Andrews, and Herbert and Andrew bishops of Glasgow and Caithness, [C. Ditnferml.] He is bishop anno 1150, [C. Glasg.~\ He is contemporary with John bishop of Glasgow, [C. Kelso;] and in the time of King Malcolm IV. with Arnold bishop of St Andrews, and Andrew bishop of Caithness, [C. Kelso et Paisley.] He is bishop here under King Malcolm IV. \Dipl. et Numism.] He is witness to a charter of that king, \Hay et Car. NewbJ\ also in the eleventh year of the same king, [C. Scone ;] and in the time of Pope Adrian IV. [Nic. Hist. Lib. p. 353.] After having sat bishop 42 years, he died anno 1169, [Mill's MS. item Cartul. Mel. RICHARD DE PRAEBENIXA, 1169-] Richard de Prae- benda, (according to Mill in the life of Bishop John de Leicester?) chaplain to Earl William before he came to be king, " Capellanus comitis Willielmi," [Dalrymp. Coll. p. 322,] and chaplain likewise to him after he became king, was consecrated bishop of this see by Richard bishop of St Andrews, within the church of St Andrews, on the 9th day of August anno 1169, as would appear by Mr Mill ; but anno 1170, by Citron. Melr. and in " Vigilia Sti Laurentii," 1170, [Hay.] 4 Richard was bishop of this see contempo- rary with Richard bishop of St Andrew, [Kelso?] He * Gregory, bishop of Drmkeld, is witness to a charter of Robert, bishop of St Andrews, granting the abbey of the island of L*>chleven, the property of the Culdees, and the vestments and books of this abbey, to the church of St Andrews. The grant must hare been made before 1158 ; but there is no date. See supra, page 9. 4 " Ricardus Episcopus de Dunkeldyn" is mentioned in the agreement made betwixt William king of Scotland and Henry IL king of England, [Fad. Angl. Mac/or] THE SEE OF DUNKELD. 75 died, it is said, in the year 1173, or 4, at Cramond, in Mid-Lothian, and was buried in the church of St ColuimVs Inch, in the Frith of Edinburgh, a little below the Queens- ferry. CORMACUS, 1177.] Of this person I can say little else, than that he seems to have died in the year 1177. Sir James Dalrymple [Collect, p. 240 and 245,] is of opinion, that this Cormac was formerly bishop of Mort- lich, and was translated thence to this see, in which, how- ever, he says, he never came to settle. And yet Cormacus is bishop here in the time of King David, and contempo- rary with Robert and John, bishops of St Andrews and Glasgow, [C. Dunferml.f. 7. vers. etfol. 8. rectJ\* This might make him prior in time even to Gregory, if the same cartulary did not make Gregory contemporary with Ro- bert elect of St Andrews, which makes the accounts of these somewhat intricate, and hard to be reconciled. GREGORY, 11 .] Gregory, though omitted by Mr Mill, is ranked as successor to Cormac, [Dalr. Coll. p. 402.] I much doubt, however, whether there have been two bishops of the name Gregory ; yet, as there is one bishop of this see whose initial letter is G. contemporary with W. bishop of Glasgow, [Cart. Arbr.~\ and no person was bishop of Glasgow of this name before William Malvicine about anno 1200, I will not decide. G. is also bishop here under King William, and contemporary with Joceline bishop of Glas- gow, [C. Dunferm.~\ and in the time of Richard bishop of St Andrews, [ibid.] and some one Gregory was contempo- * Cormacus Episcop. Dunkeld. signed a chaiter of David I. granted in 1188 to the monastery of Dunfermline. Robert, bishop of St Andrews, John, bishop of Glasgow, Gregory, bishop of Moray, and Macbeth, bishop of Ross, sign along with him. Mac. Trans. Chart. Dum. page 174 6. 76 THE SEE OF DUNKELD. rary with Andrew bishop of Caithness, Robert and Brice abbots of Scone and St Colms, [ibid.]* WALTER DE BIDUN, 1178.] Walter de Bidun, for- merly one of the Clerici regis^ and afterwards chancellor of the kingdom, became elect of this see anno 1177, but died next year before his consecration, [Melr.~\ yet Mill, who should know well, says he was consecrated in the year 1178, and died full of years and pious works. JOHN SCOT, 1200.] John Scot, an Englishman 5 , and archdeacon of St Andrews, was the next bishop here. John is bishop here in the time of Hugo bishop of St Andrews, [Cart. Aberb.] John also was contemporary with Hugh bishop of St Andrews, John bishop of Glasgow, and Mat- thew bishop of Aberdeen, [Kelso,~\ and with Matthew bi- shop of Aberdeen, [Cart. Scon.'] Some John or another was bishop here in the time of Swan, the son of Thor, [ibid.] -f- John was bishop here when Walter w T as prior of St * See Note E. in Appendix. 5 Macf. Is called an Englishman by the Scottish historians, because bora at Podoth in the earldom of Chester; [Fordvn, V. I. p. 351.] and he is called " Joannes Scotus," or Scotsman, by the English historians, because his father was of this country ; in the same manner as John, earl of Hunting- don, son to Earl Darid, King "William the Lyon's brother, is called by them " Joannes Scotus." Our bishop's mother was sister to Matthew Kynnin- mound bishop of Aberdeen, by which Matthew he was consecrated bishop of St Andrews in the church of the abbey of Holyroodhouse, in the year 1177, [Fordun.] But this having been done contrary to the inclination of "Wil- liam king of Scotland, he chased the new-elected bishop of St Andrews, together with the said Bishop Matthew, out of the kingdom, banished their re- lations, and confiscated the revenues of the former, and caused burn the houses of the latter. [Benedict, abbas Petroburgensis, de vita et gestis Henrici II. tt Ricardil.} " item, Rogerus Hoveden ad annum 1180." " Joannes Episco- " pus Dnnkeld." is witness to a charter granted by Gilbert earl of Strathera to the abbacy of Inchaffray, anno 1200. [Writs of Mar.} t John, bishop c* Dunkcld, is cotemporary with Josceline, bishop of Glas- gow, who died 1199. {Chart. Will, in Gibson's History of Glasgow, p. 562.) THE SEE OF DUNKELD. 77 Columb's Inch, [Car?. Dunferm*] He was bishop in the reign of King Wilh'am, [Dip. ct Num. et Car. Kels,] and he was bishop anno 1201, [Cart. Gla$g. et KelsJ] This bishop was a good man, and, at his own particular request to the Pope, all that country which now makes up the diocese of Argyle, was disjoined from his bishoprick of DunkekL Sometime before his death he took on the habit of a monk in the monastery of Newbottle, where he died and was bu- ried in the year 1203, after he had sat twenty-five years. He had his life written by William Binnine, prior of New- bottle, afterwards abbot of Coupar, [Fordim.] But Mr Mill says, it was written by Thomas Lauder bishop of this see ; and in truth his life might have been wrote by them both. [See Hugh, bishop of St Andrews, for more about this bishop. ] After this bishop the chronicle of Melrose places RICHARD DE PR EBENDA as bishop of this see, and says, he was one of the king^s derici, and his kinsman ; and I have indeed met with as a witness, in the time of King William, " Richardo clerico meo de Praebenda," and the co-witnesses, Matthew bishop of Aberdeen, and Richard Morville con- stable. At another time, " Richardo de Praebenda, et " Stephano de Papedy ,"" witnesses ; and Richard de Prae- benda is witness to a charter of Maldoven Earl of Levenax in the year 1226, i. e. no less than twelve years after King Alexander II. began to reign ; but in none of all these writs has this Richard de Praebenda the designation of bi- shop, nor is it likely there should have been two bishops so near to one another of the same name and surname ; and yet we do find Richard bishop here in the time of Pope Innocent III. and of Richard bishop of Brechin, and John bishop of Dunblane, [Melros.] as also Richard bishop here, but without date, and contemporary with William bishop of St Andrews, Thomas, John, and Walter, priors of St Andrews, May, and St ColnVs, [Cart. Dunferm.'] This bishop, they say, died in the month of May 1210, and was 78 THE SEE OF DUNKELD. buried in St Colm's Inch on St Mary Magdalene's day, viz. July 21. After Richard, the same chronicle sets down, as the next bishop, JOHN, archdeacon of Lothian, and says, he was elected on St Mary Magdalene's day, in the year 1211, and that he died anno 1214. But this is evidently John of Leicester, cousin to King William, and archdeacon of Lo- thian. He was bishop here anno 1211, [MelJ] and anno 1213, [GlasgJ] He sat in this see eleven years, died at Cramond, and was interred in St ColumVs Inch, anno 1214, as his predecessor had been. [Fordun.] This bishop John of Leicester is posted by Abbot Mill immediately after John Scot ; and, according to him, the bishop that followed John of Leicester is HUGO or HEW, with the surname de SIGILLO, a monk of Arbroath. Hugo bishop of Dunk eld is mentioned in a peram- bulation betwixt the monks of Coupar and Scone, but there is no date, [Scon. etMar.] Hugo bishop of Dunkeld is witness to a charter by King William, dated at Forfar, [ErroL] Hugo, bishop here, is named in the Cartulary of Cam- buskenneth, and appears to be in the time of King Wil- liam. He is bishop here in the fifth year of King Wil- liam, [Cart. Aberd.] and the other witnesses are Joceline, Richard, Turpin, Andrew, bishops of Glasgow, Mur- ray, Brechin, and Caithness. Hugh was bishop here under King Alexander II. [Cart. Aber. et Glasg.] He was bishop in the tenth year of King Alexander II., and is contemporary with William bishop of St Andrews, [Cart. Newb.~\ This bishop was so kindly and charitable to the poor, that he got the denomination of the Poor Man's Bi- shop ; and yet he is said to have died within a year, " octavo Idus Januarii 1214," which, however, will not at all agree with the vouchers above produced. THE SEE OF DUNKELD. 79 MATTHEW SCOT, Elect.] One Matthew, whose surname was Scot, and at that time chancellor of the kingdom, is placed as the next bishop of this see ; but as Mr Scot died before his consecration, this may be the reason why Abbot Mill says, that, after Hugo, 6 GILBERT became bishop of Dunkeld, He had been chaplain to Bishop Hugo, and continued bishop here, they say, no less than twenty -two years, Gilbert is elect of Dunkeld in the time of King Alexander II. Gil- bert was bishop, but without any date, [Cart. Dunferm.] He is bishop here anno 1220, [Scon.] anno 1231, [Balmer.] in the 19th year of King Alexander II. \Cambusk.] in the 23d year, [Diplom.] and in the 28th year, \Glasg.] He died in the year 1236, and was buried in St Cohn's Inch. [Melr. and Mill] GALFRID LIVERANCE, 1236.] GaJfrid Liverance, aL de Liberatione, (viz. ctiptivorum^) one of the king's clerks. One Galfridus de Liberatione, doubtless the same who is now bishop, is a witness to King Alexander, anno reg. 14, and is contemporary with Robert bishop of Ross, and with Magistro Matthaeo cancellario, [Car. Mor.] Galfrid is bishop here, and contemporary with William Blund, who mortifies a toft of land to the abbey of Scone, [Cart. Scon.] and he is bishop here in the time of King Alexander, and contemporary with David and Clement, bishops of St An- drews and Dunblane, [Cart. Balmerm.] He is bishop here in the year 1237, [Errol et Dipl] He is also in the 27th year of King Alexander 7 and contemporary with William bishop of Glasgow and chancellor, [Cart. Newbot.] He was bishop 6 We are told that the chancellor had been postulated bishop of Aberdeen, just at the time he was elected into the see of Dunkeld. See Live* of the Bishops of Aberdeen. 7 " Galfridus Episcopus Dunkeldensis" is mentioned in a charter of King Alexander II. to King Henry of England, anno 1244. [Fader. L p. 428. Macfarl] 80 THE SEE OF DTTNKELD. annis!239 and 1247, [Cambusk.] and yet in the same CVzr- tul. Cambusk. one Gavin was bishop of Dunkeld in the 31st year of King Alexander II. i. e. anno 1245, and Gal- frid had been bishop before him : Vid. ib.fol. 126, 127. After the death of William Malvicine, bishop of St An- drews, Galfrid had been postulated for bishop of that see in the year 1238 ; but as he was neither agreeable to the Pope nor to the king, he continued bishop of Dunkeld till the year 1249, when he died at Tippermuir, on St Cecilia's day, November 22, and was buried within the old church of Dunkeld, which had pertained to the convent. RICHAED, 1249.] After Bishop Galfrid, al. Gaufrid, Abbot Mill inserts one Richard, whom he calls the king's chancellor, and says, that he lived only one year in the see. Now, as there was no king's chancellor of the name of Richard about this time, except the following bishop, Richard Inverkeithing, whom the abbot calls chamberlain to the king, whereas indeed he was chancellor,* one could be tempted to think that the abbot has fallen into some mistake here ; but I should be loth to be positive without some very strong presumption. DAVID, Elect., 1250.] It is certain, however, that one of the name David is elect of Dunkeld in the second year of King Alexander, [Reg: Chart. B. 7. No. 113.] which by the other co- witnesses 8 must have been King Alexander III. i. e. anno 1250 ; but it is more than probable, that this elect has never been consecrated : For, RICHARD INVERKEITHING, a prebend of this see, and ac- cording to MiD, chamberlain to the king, was raised to be * Fordun says Camerarita, Vol. II. p. 83. edit Goodall. 8 The co- witnesses are " Alano Hostiario Justiciario Scotiae, Davide, ab- " bate de Ntwbottle, et Gilberto de Haya ;" but if this Gilbert was the per- son who became constable of the kingdom under King Robert Bruce, he must Lave lived a very lorg time. THE SEE OF DUNKELD. 81 bishop here in the year 1250, and Richard was bishop of Dunkeld anno 1254, [Rymer,~] anno 1260, [Cambusk.] anno 1262, [Relig. Houses, p. 505,] anno 1263, [Scan. 1 ] anno 1271, [Arbr.] He was made lord chancellor in the year 1256, [Forduni] but a rebellion breaking out quickly thereafter, at the head of which was Walter Cuming, Earl of Monteith, they surreptitiously got into their hands the great seal, which the chancellor had lodged with one Stutte- ville, his own dean, and the same was made use of by them to their own evil purposes ; but the rebellion having been speedily suppressed, the chancellor declined to continue any longer in that office. The abbot gives him a very fine cha- racter, and tells, that he died very aged, on St Magnus the martyr's day, in the year 1 272, and that his body was buried at Dunkeld, and his heart in the choir of the church of St Columb's Inch, which he himself had built. ROBERT DE STUTTEVILLE, 1272.] Robert de Stutte- ville, dean of Dunkeld, whom Abbot Mill applauds upon account of his birth, learning, genteel manners, and excel- lent virtues, appears to have been the successor of Rich- ard. The same author takes notice, that he had been duly elected into the see of St Andrews, anno 1253 ; but that he was overpowered by the king's intercession with the Pope in favours of Mr Abel, then archdeacon of St Andrews. This bishop died anno 1300, [Mill;~\ but here there must be some mistake : For, MATTHEW DE CRAMBETH, whom the abbot acknow- ledges to have been the next succeeding bishop, and represents him as having been put into this see by the prevailing power of Edward king of England, 9 was sent 9 " M. Episcopus Dunkeldensis" is mentioned in the Faedera, anno 1303, aud died, as will afterwards appear, before August 28, 1509, By an order, F 82 THE SEE OF DUNKELD. ambassador into France by King John Baliol, together with three other persons, viz. William, bishop of St An- drews, John de Soules, and Ingeram de Umfraville, to contract a marriage for his son Edward Baliol, in the year 1295, [Dip?.] This prelate's surname was Crambeth, probably being the son, or some near relation, of Cram- beth of that Ilk, now Dovehill, in the shire of Kinross ; and Matthew de Crambeth w r as bishop of this see in anno 1289, several years before the year 1295, [Macfarlane.'] Matthew is bishop of Dunkeld at the same time that William was bi- shop of St Andrews, \Errol ,-] and Mahen (which I suppose through some error or other may stand for Matthew) was bishop of Dunkeld anno 1290, \Rymer .] He died, accord- ing to the abbot, anno 1312; but here also there must be a mistake : For, though WILLIAM SINCLAIR, the next bishop, 10 brother to Sir Henry Sinclair of Roslin, [Rymer^\ came into this see, according to the abbot, the same year, 1312 ; yet he dated the 14th December 1509, King Edward II. appoints his beloved clerk and almoner, John de Leek, " ad petendum, exigendum, et recipiendum, no- " mine nostro, libros, veslimenta, vasa, et alia ornamenta capellae quondam " Matthei Episcopi Dunkcldensis defuncti, emae nobis, secundum consuetu- " dinem terrae nostrae Scotiae, per mortem ipsius Episcopi debentur." \Fcede- ra, Tom. HI. p. 194.] He gave the church of Melgynch to the monks of Holyroodhouse, " 2do ldu Augusti 1289." Ex Autog. copiat. per W. M. [Macf.] 10 After the death of the former bishop, there was somewhat like a double election in this see, viz. of the forementioued John de Leek, by the English interest, for which vid. Edward II. 's Letter to the Pope, dated 28th August 1309. Feeder. Tom. HI. But this Leek was never consecrated bishop here; but at last, by the procurement of King Edward, was made archbishop of Dublin in anno 1311, ibid. Feeder. Tom. III. p. 258. The other election was of William Sinclair, by the loyal Scots in the Bru- cian interest, whose consecration was violently opposed by King Edward, though at last, by the good offices of the bishop's brother, laird of Roslin, he was prevailed upon to write to the Pope in the elect bishop's favour, 8th day of February 1312. \Rymer, Macfarl.} THE SEE OF DUNKELD. 88 had been bishop here before the year 1309, [Ander- sons Independency r , App. No. 14.] He was a great fautor of King Robert Bruce, upon account of which, and of his other very noble and heroic dispositions, that king was pleased to call him his own bishop, [Boece.] Wil- liam, bishop here, is contemporary with William bishop of St Andrews, and with Maurice bishop of Dunblane, [Ifelso,] and with Henry bishop of Aberdeen, [Car. Mor.] He is bishop here anno 13 of King Robert I. [Cart. Aberd.~\ William de Sancto Claro is bishop anno 1321, [Royal Chart. ,] He is witness to King Robert's con- firmation of the monastery of Arbroath, anno regni 17, [Cambusk.] and anno 17 Rob. I. [Hay ;] also anno 19, [Cart. Arbr.~\ and 20 reg. Rob. I. [Cart. Scon, and Cam- busk.] item, anno regni 20 and 21, [Reg. Cfiar.] He is present at an agreement anno 1328, [Hay,] and is bishop anno 1334, [Foed. Aug. Vol. IV.] and he died anno 1337, [Mill.,] on the 27th day of June. [Obituary Durikeld, Hay, MS.]* Now, although nothing could seem to be better vouched than these foregoing different dates, yet WALTER is bishop in this see in the year 1324, [Cart Glasg.] and he has this most particular and re- markable designation, " Episcopi Dunkeldensis, ac con- " servatoris totius cleri Scoticani." There is a possibility that William de Sancto Claro may have died in the 17th of Rob. I. 1323, and Walter have succeeded, and died be- fore or in the 19th of the same King Robert, and then an- other William been chosen, and established in the see be- fore that year was out. Malcolmus de Innerpeffery elec- tiis Dunkeld. 1342.f * See some notice of Bishop Sinclair's castle, in Carlisle's Topographical Dictionary of Scotland, Art. Laighwood. t The see was vacant 8th Nov. 13th Ed. HI. ^1339) as appears from a man- date of that date respecting the lithes of Bonkil and Preston, in Rot. Scotia. F 2 84 THE SEE OF DUNKELD. DUNCAN, 1351.] Duncan, u said faintly by Abbot Mil. to be an Englishman, as indeed his name would not denote him to have been of that nation. He was bishop in the 21st year of King David II. [Officers of State,] also in the 23d year of the same king, i. e. 1351, [Ibid, and Writs of the Family of Mar.} He was likewise bishop here anno 1354, \Kelso ;] and the abbot adds, that he died in this see, anno 1363. But here again there must be some mistake : For, JOHN, 1356.] John n is bishop of this see in the year 1356, [Feed, Ang. Vol. V. p. 831.] He is bishop in the 30th and 31st year of King David II. i. e. A. D. 1360, [Officers of State, App. No. 21. Reg. Char. Book 16 It. Dipl. et Numism, c. 54.] John was bishop here anno 1362, [Chart. Glasg.] and anno 36 King David, i. e. A. D. 1365. [Reg. Chart.]* MICHAEL MONYMUSK.] Michael Monymusk, great chamberlain of Scotland, was the next bishop of this see. He was bishop in the 3d year of King Robert II. i. e. A. D. 1373, and sat in the Parliament at Scone 3d of April that year, [Family of Mar et Cart. Aberd. See also the act of the said Parliament the 4th April, in Ruddimans Reply to Logan, p. 460.] This bishop died the 1st March 1376. [Vid. Mill.] 11 " Richardus, Episcopus Dunkeldensis," is witness to the acknowlegment made by John Wyssi, prior of Pluscardy, and the convent thereof, of their subjection to the see of Moray, dated October 20, 1345, [Car. Morav. f. 116. r. Macfar.] 12 " John Evesque de Dunkelden." is witness to the fourteen years truce made betwixt King David II. and the King of England, dated at Edinburgh. Castle, July 20, 1 369. [Rymer, Macfar L] * And in. 1369, [Rot. Scot. 18th Jan, 43. Ed. Ill] THE SEE OF DUNKELD. 85 JOHN PEEBLES, 1377.] 13 John Peebles commenced master of arts in the year 1369, [Rymer,] and was after- wards a canon of Glasgow, and doctor in both laws.* In the year 1373, he drew up the famous act of Parliament recognizing King Robert II. 's title to the crown of Scot- land. He was afterwards employed in several public negoci- ations, which he discharged with great success and applause, [Rymer.] He was preferred to the archdeaconry of St Andrews, and constituted lord chancellor in the year 1377, [Ibid.] And at last, the same year, this see having fallen vacant by the death of Bishop Michael, he became bishop thereof, and so continued till his death anno 1396, [Mill.'] He was bishop here and chancellor in the 10th, 12th, 13th, 15th, 16th, and 19th years of King Robert II. [Roy. Chart, ct Cart. Mor. Paisley, Aberd. et Mar.] We also find him bishop here and chancellor anno 1380, [Inv. Aber.] and in the year 1389- [Peerage, p. 100.] ROBERT DE CAIRNEY, 1396.] 14 Robert de Cairney, son of Duncan de Cairny, al. Garden, al. Cardeny, laird of that Ilk, and afterwards, by marriage, laird of Foss, was the real bishop according to Mill. And this abbot likewise narrates, that he was raised to this see through the affection which the king bore to his sister. But as this bishop came not into this see until the 6th year 13 John Peebles, he was one of the plenipotentiaries appointed by King Robert II. on the part of Scotland to the congress betwixt France and Eng- land, by commission under the Great Seal, dated at Edinburgh June 6', 1384. [Foed. Angl. t. 7. p. 441. Macfarl.] * In 1362, he was treasurer of the kirk of Glasgow, [Rot. Scot. 22d July,, 36 Ed. III.] In 1573 he is called canon of Glasgow and Aberdeen, and goes to prosecute his studies in England. [Rot. Scot. 3d Mali, 47 Ed. III.] In Rymer's Fcedera, Vol. VII. p. 458 and 441, Bishop Peebles is spoken of as a cardinal ; but this statement is not supported by any authority. 14 " Robertus (de Cardney ut puto) Episcopus de Dunkeldyn." is one of the hostages for the redemption of King James I., May 21. 1421. [Rym. V. X. p. 125. Macfarl.] 86 THE SEE OF DUNKELD. of King Robert II. it does not appear very probable that a son would advance a man only upon account of his hav- ing been brother to his father's unlawful mistress. How- ever, be that as it will, the abbot acknowledges that the bishop behaved himself well, and did much good during the long possession he held of the see, for he died not be- fore the 16th day of January 1436. It was he, they say, who acquired the lands of Crawmond in excambion for Cammo in the same parish. But the abbot passes over in silence the large account of this bishop's excommunication for his not complying with the formalities of ecclesiastical processes required by the Pope. John Eglinton, prior of Blantyre, sat judge in this process, by deputation from Walter, bishop of St Andrews, in the 15th year of Pope Clement VII. i. e. anno 1392 or 3. The curious may see the whole affair at length in the Chartulary of Cambus- kenneth, in the Advocates 1 Library, Edinburgh. We find Robert bishop here anno 1408. \Roy. Chart, it. Errol."]* DONALD MACNAUGHTOX, Elect, 1436.] Donald Mac- naughton, a son of the ancient family of Maenaughton of that Ilk, [Nisb. Her. Vol. I. p. 419,] doctor of decretals and dean of Dunkeld, nephew to the preceding bishop, and in whose lifetime he had shewed himself a most faithful procurator of the affairs of this church, was elected bishop by the chapter ; but King James I. not liking the choice they had made, (as having perhaps an eye to the following person,) he died on his journey to Rome, whither he had set out in hopes of obtaining a confirmation from the Pope. * It would appear, from certain documents, that Robert de Cairney was succeeded by Bishop Nicholaus ; a deed executed by whom, in the year 1402, with a beautiful seal, is preserved in the Chapter-house at Westminster. In Nash's History of Worcestershire is the following entry in the list of incum- bents of the rectory of Belbroughton : " Nicholaus Dei gratia Dunkeldensis " episc . 28 Martii 1411." Bishop Nicholaus is omitted both by Blyln and Keith, THE SEE OF DUNKELD. 87 JAMES KENNEDY, 1438.] James Kennedy, son to the laird of Dunure, was preferred to the see of Dunkeld, whence, after he had sat two years, he was translated to the see of St Andrews ; Fordun says he was nephew to King James I. by his sister the Countess of Angus, and that he had the abbey of Scone in commendam. See more of this prelate among the Bishops of St Andrews. ALEXANDER LAUDER, 1440.] Alexander Lauder, rec- tor of Ratho, son of Sir Allan Lauder of Haltown, and brother-german to Bishop Lauder of Glasgow, was promo- ted to this see in the month of May 1440, and died on the llth October thereafter at Edinburgh, and was interred at the church of Lauder with his ancestors. JAMES BRUCE, 1441.] James Bruce, son of Sir Robert Bruce of Clackmannan, whom King David Bruce calls " di- " lectus consanguineus," was first rector of Kilmenie in Fife, [Mill,~\ about the year 1438 ; and upon the death of Bishop Lauder was advanced to the see of Dunkeld, and consecra- ted " Dominica in septuagesima anno 1441," [Ibidem.] He was bishop here anno 1442. James was bishop here anno 1444, [Chart. DunfermJ] in the which year he was made chancellor of the kingdom, [Balfour's List of the Chancel- lors.] And, accordingly, we find him chancellor anno 1444, [Chart. King- James II. B. 2. No. 128.] and this king calls him " consanguineo et cancellario nostro."" But notwith- standing his public characters, both in church and state, yet Robert Reoch Macdonachie, a powerful man in those parts, ventured to ravage his lands of Little Dunkeld be- longing to the bishopric; whereupon followed a deadly feud, and some men were killed on both sides ; but matters were at last compromised by the intervention of the Lord Glamrais, [Mill.] This Reoch Macdonachie was a prede- cessor of the now Robertson of Strowan, whose tribe is still 88 THE SEE OF DUNKELD. called Macdonachie men among the Highlanders. After the death of Bishop Cameron of Glasgow, the chancellor was translated to that see ; but before the necessary forms were expede he died next year, 1447, [Fordun.} While this prelate sat in the see of Dunkeld, " Ecclesiam suam " decoravit pretiosa cappa et quatuor pretiosis vestimentis, " et ecclesiam de Aberneit assignavit quatuor vicariis chori " Dunkelden. in perpetuum." [Mill.'] WILLIAM TURNBULL, Elect, 1447.] William Turnbull, archdeacon of Lothian, and lord keeeper of the privy seal, was nominated to the see of Dunkeld, [Fordun's Continuator.'] But Bishop Bruce, the chancellor, dying in the interim, Mr Turnbull was promoted to the see of Glasgow, before his consecration for Dunkeld. 15 JOHN RAULSTOX, 1448.] John Raulston, al. Ralph- ston, al. Raleston, of a small but very ancient family of the same designation in the shire of Renfrew, where it continues still in good repute, was first rector of Cambuslang, and sa- crist of Glasgow, next provost of Bothwell, and then dean of Dunkeld, and, about anno 1440, doctor of laws, [Officers of State, Cart. Priory St And. et Dr Mill.'} In the year 1444, he was preferred to be royal secretary, [Reg. Chart.'} and likewise keeper of the privy-seal anno 1447, and bishop of this see, to which he was consecrated 4th April 1448, [Ibid.} and we see him bishop here, and keeper of the privy-seal, anno 1448, [_Reg\ Chart.~] and John was bishop here anno 1449, [Glasg.'} in the which year he was consti- 15 He is designed " Capellanns et secretarius" to Archibald Douglas, Duke of Turrenne, October 24, 1426, [Reg. Chart.] and royal secretary to King James IF. 1444, ibid. " Joannes e Raleston, Episcopus Dunkelden. se- " renissimi Scotorum. regis secretarius primus," is so designed in letters of safe conduct granted to several Scotsmen by King Henry Vf., dated 13th August 1448, [Focd. 11. p. 213.] Item, Episcopus, aimis 1449-50-51, ibid, [Marfarl.] THE SEE OF DUNKELD. 89 tuted lord high treasurer, when he resigned his former offices of secretary and privy-seal. This same year, this bishop, with diverse other- prelates and lords, were sent to England in order to renew the truce between the two na- tions, which they brought to a bearing on the 1st Novem- ber, though without fixing it to any determinate period ; only the kings of the two nations were obliged to adver- tise each other 180 days before they should give their re- spective subjects consent to commit hostilities, [Foed. Ang. V. II. p. 242.] Before the end of this year the bishop sur- rendered the treasurer's office. In the year 1451, this prelate was again employed in an embassy to England, [ibid.'] and died the year thereafter, viz. 1452, though he was certainly alive after the 6th day of November of that year ; for, on the said day, he is witness to a charter under the great seal. [Reg. Char.~\* THOMAS LAUDER, 1452. Thomas Lauder, preceptor or master of Soltray, al. Soutray, 16 and tutor to King James II. was next preferred to this see, and exercised his func- tion very laboriously, until the year 1476, when being una^ ble any longer to endure the fatigue, by reason of his ad- vanced age, (for it is said that he was no less than 60 years old when he had the charge of the king's education,) he resigned the see of Dunkeld in favour of James Livingston the dean, [J/iZ/.] This act of this bishop gives clear light to the title of a charter in the Register, B. 9. No. 50. p. 56, viz. " Carta confirmationis super cartam per Thomam olim " episcopum Dunkelden. et nunc episcopum in universal! " ecclesia, 13. Martii 1480, factam."" He was " Magister * See Note F. in Appendix. 16 This hospital, or religious house, was seated among the hills called Soutra, which lie between East-Lothian, and theMerse, or shire of Berwick. I have found him designed, (says Macfarlane,) " Magister Thomas Lauder, " magister de Soltre," 2Gth Feb. 1459, [Reg. Char.] He obtained letters of legitimation under the great seal, dated 20th Feb. 1172, ibid. Macfarl. 90 THE SEE OF DUNKELD. domus hospitalis de Soltra," anno 4to Jac. II. [Reg: Chart. ] Thomas is bishop here anno 1455, [C. Mor.~\ He is bishop anno 1456, [Errol ,] item, anno 1462, [C. Aberbr.~\ likeways anno 1455, 1458, 1472, et 1473, [Reg-. Chart.] Thomas and James are both bishops of this see anno 1478, [Rolls of Parliament.] This bishop built a bridge over the river Tay near to his own palace : He obtained an erection of the bishop's lands on the north side of that river into one barony, called the barony of Dunkeld, as likewise of those on the south side, to be called the barony of Aberlady ; he founded several chaplainries and prebends, partly in Edin- burgh and partly in Dunkeld ; and purchased two lodg- ings, one in Edinburgh, another in Perth, for himself and his successors. He died on the 4th November 1481, [ J/?7/.] In this Bishop Lander's time, Mr Mill, canon of this see, lived, who afterwards wrote the lives of its bishops. [Dempster.] JAMES LIVINGTOTTN, 1476.*] James Livingtoun, a son of the family of Saltcoats in East-Lothian, was first rector of Forteviot and Weems, then dean of Dunkeld, and at length bishop of this see, by a resignation of the former bishop, Thomas Lauder, into the hands of the Pope, in fa- vour of his dean, of whom he had conceived (and very just- ly) a good opinion : and he was consecrated by the Bishops Hepburn of Dumblane, Balfour of Brechin, and old Bishop Lauder, in the cathedral of Dunkeld, " Dominica proxima post festum Nativitatis Joannis Baptistae," anno 1476. And as his many good qualifications were much taken notice of, * In the Rot. Scot. (25d April, 26 Hen. VL anno 1447) there is mention made of Thomas de Livingston, " Episcopus Dunkeldensis et administrator monasteriiSancti Christoferi extra muros Taurinenses." This Thomas is not placed among the bishops of Dunkeld, either by Myln or Keith ; whence we are left to conjecture, that there must be a mistake, originating in the confu- sion of names. THE SEE OF DUNKELD. 91 he was constituted lord chancellor 18th February 1483 ; but he enjoyed this high office a very short space, for he died the same year at Edinburgh, " Die Sti Augustini doctoris Aurelii," and was buried in the abbey-church of Inchcolm, within his own diocese, [Mill, and Officers of State.] He is in the rolls of Parliament anno 1478. He was bishop, but not chancellor, 1482, [Reg. Chart] James, bishop of Dunkeld, is chancellor anno 1482, [Ibid.] and on the 18th of March 1482-3 he was both bishop here and chancellor. [Ibid.] 17 ALEXANDER INGLIS, Elect, 1483.] Alexander Inglis, dean of Dunkeld, arch-deacon of St. Andrews, and keeper of the rolls, was next chosen by the chapter ; but the Pope, being displeased that he had not been consulted first, an- nulled the election. ROBERT, 1484.] Some one is Electus Dunkelden. in the roll of Parliament 24th February 1483-4; and Robert bishop of Dunkeld is witness along with William bishop of St. Andrews, and William bishop of Aberdeen, in a char- ter of apprising by King James III. of the lands of Bord- land of Ketnes, from James Earl of Buchan to Robert Lord Lisle, May 19. 1485. [Mar] GEORGE BROWN, 1484.] 1S George Brown, chancellor 17 He has been a near relation of Inglis of Lochend, in East-Lothian, to whom lie left all his effects, [Reg. Chart.] " Alexander English, electus Dun- " keld." is one of the Scots who obtain letters of safe conduct from Richard II. king of England in anno 1483, as also in November 1484, [Rymer.] But how to adjust this with the following Robert is a difficulty, since Abbot Mill, who lived at that time, says, that George Brown immediately suc- ceeded Alexander Inglis. [Macfarl.] 18 Son to George Brown, treasurer of the burgh of Dundee, who was a younger son of the Browns of Mydmar, who flourished for some generations in the counties of Aberdeen and Forfar. The bishop's mother was Jean Ba- leny. He was bora and educated in his younger years at Dundee, studied for 92 THE SEE OF BUNKELD; of Aberdeen, and rector of Tinningham in East-Lothian, was consecrated bishop of Dunkeld by the Pope Sixtus IV. in the year 1484. He was bishop here annis 1487, 88, 89, 91, 97, 1507, and 1510, [Reg. Chart.} He is witness to a charter of regality granted to the abbey of Paisley by King James IV. 19th August 1488 ; also on the 9th of August the same year, [Paisl.] He is bishop August 12. 1489, [Mar ;~\ and in the year 1496, [C. Aberbr.~] also anno 1506, [C. Ihinfer. et Errol ; Reg. Cliar. B. 13. No. 94.] This bishop has the reputation of having been a very good man, and a strict observer of discipline, and that he wrought no small reformation in all parts of his diocese, which he dis- tributed into four deanries, viz. one in the borders of Athol and Drumalbin, another in Fife, Fotherick, and Strathern, the third in Angus, and the fourth in the parts besouth Forth : and he gave the penalties of all the offenders to the churches where they resided, [Hay, MS.~] He died 12th January 1514-5, and is said to be " nuper defunctus," [Chart. B. 20.] but the date is wanting.* sometime at the university of St Andrews, and afterwards at Paris, where le commenced master of arts. At his return he was made one of the four regent* iu St Salvator's College, and ordained presbyter by Thomas Lander, bishop of Dunkeld, 26th May 1464. He was afterwards sent by King James III. to Rome, to negociate the promotion of Mr George Carmichael to the see of Glasgow, anno 1483, where he became acquainted with Pope Sixtus IV. and by whom he was consecrated bishop of Dunkeld anno 1484. In the year 1495, he gave the lands of Fordell, in vie. de Perth, to Richard Brown his brother, [Reg. Char. B. 15.] whose posterity enjoyed them, until of late that the family ended in a daughter, Antonia Brown, married to Dun- lop of that Ilk, in vie. de Air. [Macfarl.] * The castle of Clunie, (said to be the birth-place of the Admirable Crichton,) was built by Bishop Brown, about the beginning of the 16th century, and was one of his favourite residences. There is a monument on the south side of the cathedral church, which is said to be in memory of Bishop Brown. The effigies, much mutilated, still remain, and an inscrip- tion, with some armorial bearings ; but the inscription is so much obliterated as to be unintelligible There is also a mutilated figure of another of the bi- rfjops, which was discovered a short time ago, and is supposed to be that of THE SEE OF DUNKELD. 93 AXDREW STUART, Postulate, 1515.] Andrew Stuart* son to John earl of Athol, and prebendary of Craig, was postulated bishop of this see, by a thin packed meeting of canons ; yet he never obtained possession of it : However, he was afterwards put into the see of Caithness* GAVIN DOUGLAS, 1516.] Gavin Douglas, brother to the Earl of Angus, was preferred by Pope Leo X. to the go- vernment of this see. He had been formerly " Praepositus " (provost) Ecclesiae collegiatae Beati vEgidiide Edinburgh, *' films comitis Angusiae, anno 1509," [Reg- Chart.] com- monly called the provostry of St Giles, in Edinburgh, a place of great dignity and revenue ; he was likeways rector of the church of Heriot some few miles distant. He was nominat- ed by the queen-regent to the archbishoprick of St. An- drews in the year 1514 ; but a stronger party opposed him, and he was put by. Yet the same queen-regent the fol- lowing year, or the beginning of 1516, presented him to the see of Dunkeld; but the adversaries of the house of Angus created him much trouble even here also. However, at last, he was consecrated at Glasgow by Archbishop James Bea- ton. He is bishop here anno 1516, [Reg. Chart. ~] He and Patrick Panter, chancellor of his diocese, abbot of Cambus- kenneth, and secretary to the Kings James IV. and V. were sent by the States of Scotland to attend and give advice to the Duke of Albany, when he went into France to renew the ancient league. He made the celebrated translation of Virgil's JSneis, and died at London anno 1522. His life k written at large, and published together with the second edition of his translation of Virgil's JEneis, printed at Edin- burgh in the year 1710, in which are to be found many Bishop Sinclair. The monument of the Earl of Buchan (the Wolf of Badc- noch) remains pretty entire. The music used in the cathedral of Dunkeld is said to be still extant among the MSS. of the University of Edinburgh. 94- THE SEE OF DUNKELD. particulars concerning him, too long to be enumerated here : to it, therefore, the curious reader is referred. GEOKGE CRICHTON, 1527.] l8 George Crichton was the next bishop of this see, and was likeways keeper of the privy-seal ; but at what precise time he obtained this last office I cannot determine. He was a man nobly disposed, very hospitable, and a magnificent house-keeper, but in mat- ters of religion not much skilled. He was bishop here February 1727-8, [Keith's History, App. p. 4.] He was bishop 1528 and 1529, [C. Aberbr.~} He was bishop here anno 1527, and bishop and privy-seal anno 1529, {.Reg. Chart.'] He was bishop 16th February 1531, and 19th year of the king, [Cart Aberd.] also anno Jac. V. 25, [ Mar ;] item, anno 1538-9, he is keeper of the privy-seal, {Reg. Chart.} He died 24th January 1543-4. {State Letters.'} 18 Though all our Ecclesiastical historians hitherto have placed George Crichton, abbot of Holyroodhouse, as the immediate successor of Gavin Douglas, who died in the year 1522, yet, as I have not observed Mr Crich- ton mentioned in any record as bishop of Dunkeld until the year 1527, there- fore, from the following authorities, I think it is plain there has been some one bishop of this see between them, viz. Robert Cockburn. Robert, bishop of Dunkell, Gilbert earl of Cassils, and Alexander Mill, abbot of Cambuskenneth, were appointed ambassadors by King James V. of Scotland, to King Henry VIII. of England, for negociating a truce betwixt the two kingdoms, which they actually performed 29th November 1524. [Rym. Tom. XIV. p. 27, &c.] The same thing is also mentioned by Bishop L,esly, Lib. 9. in these words : " Robertus Cockbum episcopus Dunkeld. le- " gatus a Jacobo Vto. ad Henricum VIII. de pace anno 1524>." And this bishop also adds, " Grinvici orationem Latinam, exquisitissimo eloquentiae " instructu ornatam, ad regem frequentissima nobilitate habuit, ut pax sin- " cera omni simulationis et odii suspicione radicitus evulsa firmaretur." [Macfarl.] * George Crichton was a brother of Crichton of Naunchton. Sec Foundation of St Thomas's Hospital, in MS, Register of Bailies and Burgh of Canongatc. THE SEE OF DUNKELD. 95 JOHN HAMILTON, 1545.] John Hamilton, natural son of James first earl of Arran, and brother to James duke of Chattelherault, and at that time abbot of Paisley, came next into this see by the interest of his brother, the earl, who was now governor of the kingdom. The abbey of Paisley he seems to have resigned to his brother, James Hamilton, another natural son of this noble family, in the year 1544. But though the lord govemour had early enough nomi- nated his brother to the Pope for this see, yet we find that (through the intrigues, no doubt, of Robert Crichton, ne- phew to the preceeding bishop) that affair was still in sus- pense in the month of December 1544, [Episrt. Reg. Scot] John is bishop here in the month of August 1546, \_Regist. Privy Council,] and John is bishop of Dunkeld, .and trea- surer, llth October 1547, [/6zd.] and 14th June 1549, [Mar;~\ so that Bishop Hamilton has not been so quickly put into the see of St. Andrews as is commonly believed. In a large memorial which the queen-dowager, lord go- vernour, and other noblemen, &c. sent to the king of France, 22d April 1550, by Thomas, master of Erskine, this that followeth makes an article, viz. " FinaUy, to inform the " King's Majesty, that the bishoprick of Dunkeld is now " vacant be the promotion and translation of my Lord " Archbishop of St. Andrews fra the said sete of Dunkeld, " quha bruikit the samyn peaceablie, but ony interruption, " the space of thre zeirs and mare ; and now, my lord go- " vernour has written diverse times to the Papers Haliness " quhilk last decessit, for the promotion of Donald abbot of " Coupar, uncle to the Earl of Ergile, to the said bishop- *' rick ; not the less the Pape's Haliness as zit postpones " the said promotion, be the importune sollicitation and " wrang information of ane Mr Robert Crichton, quha, on " this manner, intends to purchase the samyn, but ony sup- " plication or licence of my lord governour, or ony " havand autorite for the time, to the great hurt of the " Queen's Grace's privilege) quhilk is, and ay has bene iiv 96 THE SEE OF DUNKELD. " use, that na promotion of prelacy pass in Rome but the " princess supplication therefor, desiring his Grace [the king *' of France] to write right effectuouslie to the Papers Hali- " ness, college of cardinals, and his Grace's ambassador " standing in Rome, for preservation of the Queen's Grace's " privilege, and promotion of the said abbot, conform to " the Queen's Grace's supplications and writings, and be " my lord governour in her Grace's name." [Regist. of Priv. Counc.] But notwithstanding all this solicitation in favour of Donald abbot of Coupar, yet ROBERT CRICHTON, nephew to the former Bishop George Crichton, who had made great application at Rome to have been advanced to this see, upon a resig- nation of his uncle in his favour, and likewise after his uncle's death, but was baulked of his designs at that time by the stronger interest of the Earl of Arran, governour of the kingdom, [Epist. Reg. Scot.] was now (1550) promot- ed to this see, arid continued bishop here, till he was outed by the new reformers. He was bishop here December 22. 1561, [Keith's History, App. p. 175 and 181.] This bishop, it is said, had been appointed a commissioner for divorcing the Earl of Bothwell from Lady Jane Gor- don. REFORMATION. 1. JAMES PATON, 1571.] In the month of September 1571, James Paton received a ratification by the young king of his election into the see of Dunkeld, proceeding upon a licence-royal in the month of February the same year ; THE SEE OF DUNKELD. 97 and at both these dates the see is declared to be void through process of forfaulture led against Robert sometime bishop thereof, so that Robert Crichton was still alive at that time, [Register of Benefices, Gifts, #c.] and, 2d Oc- tober 1574, there is a letter directed to the reverend father in God, James, bishop of Dunkeld, [Register of Gifts, 8fC.~\ It is reported, that Bishop Paton was deprived in the year 1575 for dilapidation of his benefice, \Hay, MS.] I have seen a seal of Bishop Paton, by the favour of one of his name ; but the armorial-bearing is much obli- terated, and seems to have been contained in a small com- pass ; however, the legend is plain enough, viz. " S. Jaco- " bi episcopi de Dunkeld." [R. K.] This bishop was the lineal representative of the family of Ballilisk in the parish of Muckhart. His gravestone there bears this inscription : " Jacobus Paton de Middle Ballilisk, quondam episcopus " de Dunkeld, qui obiit 20 Julii 1596." The word quon- dam would indeed denote, that this person has not been bishop at his death ; and the story of his extrusion is thus told among his relations : They say that, before his colla- tion to the bishopric, he had purchased from the family of Douglas a small farm pertaining to it, called Muckhart- mill ; that disputes happening to arise between two great families whose lands lay contiguous, they destroyed his castle ; and that the Earl of Argyle had the art to persuade Mr Paton to dispone that piece of land to his lordship, and, in return, the earl promised to procure him the bishop- ric of Dunkeld, with this provision also, that the bishop should give his lordship a certain share of the tithes, &c. Mr Paton complied ; but a revolution happening at court, his patron's interest there began to fall, and the bishop, to avoid a prosecution of simony, either surrendered the bi- shopric or was dismissed. 2. PETERRoLLOCK,1603.] Peter Rollockwas made titular bishop of Dunkeld by King James VI. He was one of the 98 THE SEE OF DUNKELD. lords of session, and he accompanied the king into Eng- land in the year 1603, where he was naturalized. 3. JAMES NICOLSON, 1606.] James Nicolson, parson of Meigle, was preferred to this see in the year 1606, and he died on the 17th August 1607, [Calderwood ;] and Augus- tine says, he was called to court, 1606, for agreeing the con- tentions of the clergy. He was chosen to preside in the as- sembly at Linlithgow, 10th December 1606. Augustine Hay says also, that this diocese had one or two titulars, laymen, after Bishop Paton; " after whom,' 1 adds he, " I find " Peter bishop of Dunkeld, who was chosen to attend King " James VI. in his journey to England 1603."" 4. ALEXANDER LINDSAY, 1638.] Alexander Lindsay, a son of the house of Evelick, and parson of St Mados, was promoted, after the death of Bishop Nicolson, and con- tinued in the see till the year 1638, when he renounced his office, abjured Episcopacy, submitted to Presbyterian pa- rity, and accepted from the then rulers his former church of St Mados. He acquired the barony of Evelick in the Carse of Gowrie. He had a daughter married to Patrick Hay of Pitfour, 1615, \_Errol.~] I have a seal of this bishop. [R. K.] 5. GEORGE HALLIBURTON, 1662.] George Halliburton, minister at Perth, a very good worthy man, was made bishop of Dunkeld by letters-patent from King Charles II. dated the 18th January 1662. He died anno 1664. 6. HENRY GUTHRY, 1664.] Henry Guthry, son to John Guthry, who was a son of the family of Guthry in Angus, was first domestic chaplain to the Earl of Mar, and then was received a minister at Stirling. Though he qualified himself according to the forms then in use, yet he was still a moderate man, which made both him and his colleague, THE SEE OF DUNKELD. 99 Mr Allan, be first accused and then deposed from their ministry, upon the score of malignancy, on the 14th No- vember 1648, [His own Memoirs.] He carried himself pru- dently, and lived quietly thereafter until the restoration of the king, and then he was reponed to his ministerial office, or rather put into the ministry. He was made bishop of Dunkeld in the year 1664 or 1665, and he possessed the see till his death anno 1676 or 1677. He wrote, Memoirs of Scottish Affairs from the year 1637 until the murder of good King Charles I. 7. WILLIAM LIXDSAY, 1677.] William Lindsay, son to James Lindsay of Dovehill, and minister at Perth, was consecrated bishop of this see on the 7th of May 1677, ICharta Publ.] He died anno 1679- 8. ANDREW BRUCE, 1679-] Andrew Bruce, archdeacon of St Andrews, was preferred to this see anno 1679, but was deprived anno 1686, for non-cpmpliance with the mea- sures of the court. Three bishops, it appears, had given some disgust to the court on this score ; for in the Secre- tary's Books there is an order, signed by the king, requiring the Earl of Moray, his Majesty's high commissioner, to make use but of one of the three letters of the same date, signed by his Majesty, for turning out of three bishops, dated Whitehall, 22d May 1686, countersigned Melfort. And of the same date there is a letter by the king to the privy council, ordering them to remove the bishop of Dun- keld from that diocese ; so the storm has fallen on Bishop Bruce. However, on the 15th of August 1687, there is, in the same books, to be found his Majesty's dispensation to Dr Bruce, late bishop of Dunkeld, for exercising the function of the ministry. A right strange paper truly ! And on the 4th May 1688, there is a cangt d'elire to the chapter of Orkney, and a nonunion of Andrew, late bishop 100 THE SEE OF DUNKELD. of Dunkeld, to be by them elected bishop of that see. In the year 1688 he was restored to the bishopric of Orkney. 19 9. JOHN HAMILTON, 1686.] John Hamilton, descended of Hamilton of Blair, who was come of William, son to John Hamilton, archbishop of St Andrews, at the time of the Reformation, was made bishop of Dunkeld the 19th Octo- ber 1686. He survived the Revolution, and died one of the ministers of Edinburgh, and sub-dean of his Majesty's chapel- royal. He was son to John Hamilton of Blair, by Barbara Elphinston, his wife, daughter to James Lord Balmerino, secretary of state. 19 There is in the Secretary's Books an order from the king to this bishop for L.100 Sterling yearly, 23d October 1685, possibly upon account of the sniallneis of the revenue. THE SEE OF ABERDEEN. BY the cartulary of this see, in the Advocate's Library at Edinburgh, it is evident, that it was first founded at Mort- lich, 1 by King Malcolm III. in the sixth year of his reign, i. e. A. D. 1010. It is true the bishop of Carlisle, in his Historical Library, would have this foundation to have been made by King Malcolm IV. commonly called the Maiden. But Sir James Dalrymple, Collect, p. 135, does effectually refute that opinion. See a copy of the first foundation in the appendix.* BEAXUS, 1015.] The first bishop of this new erection was Beyn or Beanus, concerning whom we are told, that he administered his diocese for two and thirty years, with that prudence, integrity, and all those other virtues that became a true pastor of souls, that neither the honour to which he was raised prejudiced in the least his humility and contempt of himself, nor any exterior occupations took off his continual attention to and familiarity with his God, [Camerar. Menol.~\ He is enrolled amongst the saints on die 16th day of December, and is said to have died in the year 1047, at Mortlich, and was buried at the postern door of his church, where his effigy lies in a wall near to the 1 Mortlich, or Murthlack, is the seat of a parish church to this present time. It stands w ithin the shire of Banff, about twelve miles from the mouth of the river Spey, three miles distant from the said river, betwixt the two cas- tles of Balveny and Achindovvn, and about thirty- six miles distant from the town of Aberdeen. The occasion for the foundation of this Episcopal see was a victory obtained over the Danes, near to that place, anno Domini 1010. * See Note G. in Appendix. 102 THE SEE OF ABERDEEN. said door, cut out of stone, yet to be seen, [Chanonry of Aberdeen, MS.] This new church was dedicated to St Moloch. DONORTIUS, 10 .] After him succeeded Donortius, al. Barnocius. He died in the year 1098. CORMACUS, 10 .] Cormacus, a person of great prudence and virtue, says Hector Boethius in his Account of the Bishops of this See. Sir James Dalrymple is of opinion, that this bishop was translated to be the first bishop of the see of Dunkeld, but that he never removed thither, [Collect. p. 240, 245, & 389.] He sat bishop the space of thirty- nine years. NECTANUS, 1106.] Nectanus became bishop in the lat- ter end of the reign of King Alexander I. and lived nearly through ah 1 the reign of King David I. who translated the see from Mortlich to Old Aberdeen ; 2 and as the see for- 2 The city of New Aberdeen, the capital of a large shire, to whicTi it gives name, is situated near the mouth of the river Dee, which runs in a pretty straight course the space of full forty Scottish miles, and makes a tolerably good tide-haven at its entry into the sea. Old Aberdeen, where is the bi- shop's see, stands a little to the north, not above half a mile's void space dis- tant from the New, and has the river Don running near by it. Both these rivers abound in salmon fish, but that of Don has no harbour at its mouth. Before the translation of the Episcopal see hither, this was only a vicarage of four ploughs of land, and had a little kirk, where now the cathedral stands, called the kirk of Kirktoun, dedicated to St Machar. The New Town, which is a right pretty place, and four times at least as large as the other, containing between 8 and 9000 inhabitants, was first erected into a royal burgh by Gregory King of Scotland, anno 878, and had its privileges greatly enlarged by king William the L.yon, anno llb'5, who is said to have had a pleasant palace in it, where now the town's hospital or bead-house stands ; and afterwards, anno 1214, by King Alexander II. who called it his own town. It suffered greatly in the time of the civil wars betwixt Bruce and Baliol, by an English garrison in the castle, which the citizens having with great unanimity and boldness stormed, and put the garrison to the sword, in memory of so brave an action it bean for arms three castles in a THE SEE OF ABERDEEN. 103 merfy was but poor, and ill-provided, this king conferred many lands upon it in the 13th year of his reign, as may be seen in the new charter of erection, of which see an exact copy in the appendix, and likewise of the bull of bloody shield, tressed round with fleurs de lis, with two leopards for support- ers, and the motto, " Bon Accord." But the English returning with a fleet about four years after, in the reign of King David II. anno 1355, and having landed in the night-time, surprised and burnt the city, and killed most of the inhabitants ; the burning lasted for six days. "When it was afterwards re- built by the favour and assistance of King David Bruce, (who lived there for some time, and set up a coinage in it, as did the Kings James I. II. Stc.) it got the denomination of New Aberdeen : And as the word aber, in old Scot- tish, signifies the inlet or mouth of a river, where it runs into the sea, or into a greater river, these two towns have taken their names, Aberdece and Aber- donia, from the two rivers Dee and Don respectively, though they have not for the most part kept close to the latter syllable. However, this may in general be observed, that the Latin appellation of either town is commonly Aberdo- nia ; and the English appellation is as commonly Aberdeen. In the Old Town there is a college founded in the time of King James IV. where all arts and sciences are taught ; and this obtains the name of the King's College, to distinguish it, I suppose, from another college enjoying the same privileges within the New Town, founded by King James VI. at the expense of the Earl Marischal, and from him called the Marischal College ; and both these colleges were united into one university by King Charles L and appointed to be denominated after him the Caroline University. Diverting it is, to see how extravagantly the English writers in geogra- phy, especially the gazetteers, talk concerning this city of Aberdeen. They generally take it for granted, that the whole kingdom of Scotland is divided into two provinces or parts, Highland and Lowland. This division might in some sense pass well enough : But then their grand error lies in the dividing of these two provinces, by an imaginary line drawn from east to west ; from the town of Aberdeen, for example, up through the country westward ; and so they call all the parts of the kingdom which lie on the south of this line by the name of Lowland, and all the parts benorth this line they call High- land; than which there cannot be a greater blunder: For the Highland pro- vince (if it must be so named) contains those parts of the kingdom which are really and truly high and mountainous, and the Lowland province those parts which are comparatively low and level ; and these low parts are those which lie on the east sea all along the coast. So that the line which should divide the Highland from the Lowland province of Scotland ought to be drawn, not from east to west, but from north to south, provided still that the line go not farther southward than the two friths of Edinburgh and Glasgow. The 104 THE SEE OF ABERDEEN. confirmation by Pope Adrian IV. At what time this bishop died is uncertain ; for though Hector Boethius re- lates, that he lived unto the first year of King Malcolm IV. yet this cannot be true, since the next bishop, EDWABD, is witness to King David the First's gift to the abbey of Dunfermline, [Cart. Dunferm. fol. 6.] Edward was also, 8th December, in the third year of King Mal- colm IV. at which time this king made a confirmation of his grandfather King David's donation to this see. [Cart. Dunferm.] GALFEID, 112 .] Galfrid is bishop here in the time of Pope Adrian IV. [Nicolson's Hist. Libr. p. 353,] and this Pope was dead anno 1159- This bishop was cer- tainly dead before the llth year of King Malcolm IV. for in that year this king makes a new gift to this see, at which time he expressly makes mention of Bishop Matthew, [New Erection.'] See the gift in the appendix. N. B. King William takes notice only of the Bishops Nectan and Edward, before Bishop Matthew.* MATTHEW, 1164.] Matthew, whose surname was Ki- ninmund, of a family of the same designation in the shire of Fife, was formerly archdeacon of Lothian, 3 [Dalrym- ple's Collec.~\ and became bishop of this see in the year whole kingdom of Scotland may, no doubt, be very appositely divided into two parts, viz. the northern and the southern, according as they lie to the south or the north of these two friths of Forth and Clyde : And when the partition of Scotland is thus rectified, there is no doubt but Aberdeen is the capital city of the northern province ; but never can it be said to be situated in the coun- ty of Moray, according to a noted gazetteer. See the Map. 5 The see of St Andrews was so large, as containing, on the south side of the river and frith of Forth, all the bounds of the present bishoprick of Edin- burgh, that the bishop thereof found it needful to have an archdeacon under him in those parts, who had the title of Archdeacon of Lothian. * See Note G, before. THE SEE OF ABERDEEN. 105 1172, [Cart. Melr.~\ yet in the chartulary of this see there is a charter by King Malcolm IV. in the llth year of his reign, to Matthew bishop of Aberdeen, which certainly must have been at lowest about anno 1164. M. is bishop here under King Malcolm, and contemporary with Andrew bishop of Caithness, [C. Durnferm.] and M. is bishop here under King William, [Ibid.~\ He was bishop here at the time of the donation which King William made to the ab- bey of Holyroodhouse, [Officers of State, p. 9, 10. it. Dal- rymple's Collections, p. 271. J He is witness to a charter of King William to Haldane laird of Gleneagles, and he is witness to King William, [Cart. Glasg. it. Reg. Chart. B. 7. No. 113.] He was bishop anno 1170, by King Wil- liam's charter to him and this see, the 5th year of his reign; also anno 10 regis, i. e. 1175, [New Erection.] He con- secrated Reginald the first abbot of Arbroath, about the year 1178, and he was contemporary with Hugo bishop of St Andrews, [C. Arbr.'} There is a charter by Matthew- bishop of Aberdeen, to which is witness Henry abbot of Arbroath, [_Cart. Aberd.~\ Matthew was also bishop in the time of King Alexander II. [Cart. Arbr.] If so, he could not have died in the year 1199, as Chron. Melr. relates, far less anno 1197, as Hector Boece says. It is indeed very unlikely, that one and the same person should have been a bishop in the end of the reign of King Malcolm IV. and likewise in the beginning of King Alexander II. But to put this matter beyond all uncertainty, there is a charter or grant by King William, to which Matthew, elect of Aberdeen, is a witness, and the co-witnesses are " Engel " Ep. de Glascu. Richard de Morevill Const. Gualt fil. " Alani Dapif. Ric. Cumyn, Hug. Clerico meo, Ric. Cle- " rico, apud Strivelin.'" [Cart. Morav. f. 34.] JOHN, 1200.] John, prior of Kelso, was the next bi- shop here. John is elect of Aberdeen, and witness to King William, together with William the chancellor elect of 106 THE SEE OF ABERDEEN. Glasgow at that time, which must have been about the year 1200, for this was bishop Malvicine ; and so this again serves to assure us, that Bishop Matthew Kininmont was far from living till the time of King Alexander, since his suc- cessor was bishop elect under King William I. And, again, John is bishop here in the time of Gilchrist earl of Angus, [C. Abr.~\ and Gilchrist lived under King Malcolm IV. and King William. He is witness to Earl David's charter of O Lindoris, [Hay. .] He was bishop of this see anno 1201, [Cart. Glasg. et Kdsl\ and died in the year 1207, [Cr. Melr.~\ or, according to Hector Boece, 1206. But, N. B. That the two cartularies of Glasgow and Arbroath cannot be consistent in this and the former bishop. ADAM CRAIL, 12 .} Adam, whose surname was Ka- rail, i. e. Carail, al. Crail, in the shire of Fife, and not Kaid or Kald, [Macfarlane,~] was one of the king's clerici, and succeeded John in this see, [Melr.] A. is bishop here in the time of King William, [Charter in the Peerage., p. 477.] He died, according to Hector Boece, in the year 1227. MATTHEW SCOT, Postulate, 15 .] Matthew Scot, [ Mel.~\ archdeacon of St Andrews, and chancellor of the kingdom, was postulated bishop of this see, and much about the same time he was likewise postulated bishop of Dunkeld ; but he died before he had been consecrated to either of the two sees. Hector Boece seems to yield, that he was to have gone to Dunkeld, as being most agreeable to the king. GILBERT STIRLINE, 1228.] Gilbert de Stryvelin, or Stirline, a man well born, and much esteemed for the re- gularity of his life, came next into this see. Sir James Dalrymple makes mention of a charter by him about the year 1228. And G. bishop of Aberdeen is witness to a charter by King Alexander II. on the 9th day of October, in the 18th year of his reign, t. e. about 1232, to " Magis- THE SEE OF ABERDEEN. 107 *' tro Nesso medico nostro," dated at Aberdeen. He died in the year 1238, [Hect. Boet.] but in 1239, [Melr.] RANDOLF DE LAMBLEY, 1238.] Randolf, al. Radulf, al. Rodulfus de Lambley, formerly abbot of the monastery of Arbroath, was elected the same year bishop of this see, [Melr. et Hect. Boeth.~\ Rad. is bishop anno reg. Alexandri 27, and contemporary with William bishop of Glasgow, the chancellor, and with G. bishop of Dunkeld, [Cart. Newb.~\ He was bishop the 28th of that king anno Domini 1242, [v. Erect. <$fc.] He is named as contemporary with A. and J. abbots of Arbroath and Lindores, \_Kelso.~\ R. and Ro. bishop of Aberdeen is mentioned in a charter in the thirty- second year of King Alexander II. i. e. anno Domini 1245 or 6, [Ni&b. Heraldry, App. p. 247, it. Chart. Aberbr.} He is said to have been a man of great virtue, and to have travelled through all his large diocese on foot, and that he never relaxed from the spare diet which he had used in his monastery. He died anno 1247. \Lesly.~} PETER DE RAMSEY, 1247.] Peter de Ramsey, son to Nesius, or Neso de Ramsay, and brother to another Ne- sius, or Neso de Ramsay, who were proprietors of the lands of Forthar and several other lands in Fife, [ Auto- graph, penes Forthar.~\ But there is another charter by King Alexander II. in the 18th year of his reign, and sub- scribed at Aberdeen, " Magistro Nesso medico nostro, ter- " ras de Banff, in Feodo de Alyth," &c. ; which original charter is in the hands of Ramsay laird of Banff in Perth- shire to this day, 1752, and the names of the witnesses are, " G. Ep. Aberd. Willielmo de Bondington cancel. Walter. " F. Alan. Senescal. justiciar. Scot. D. comite de Mar, " Phylip. de Malevill ; Walter Byset, Jacob, filio Mor- " gund, Roger f. Glay, M. F. comitis de Levenox, Ro- " bert. de Meyners." This Peter was formerly a monk of Arbroath, but was bishop here anno 1250, [Cart. Aberd.'] 108 THE SEE OF ABERDEEN. and in the fourth year of King Alexander III. [New Erect.'] He was bishop here anno 1254, [C. Aberb. et Rymer^] also anno 1256, [Cart. Aberd.~] where he makes mention of Edward, Gilbert, and Radolf, his predecessors as bishops of Aberdeen. He died in that same year 1256. [C. Melr.-] RICHARD DE POTTON, 1256.] Richard, 1256. Fordun [Vol. II. p. 92.] mistakes his Christian name by calling him Andrew, as Hector Boece does his surname, which he calls de Pottock, but it was really de Potton, and seems to be derived from Potton, a market-town near Bigleswade in Bedfordshire. The former of these historians tells us, that though he was an Englishman by birth, he was " prius " per sacramentum fidelitatis Scoticatus," [For dun, ubi supra.] The chanonry MS. says, he came to be bishop about anno 1256, and sat bishop the space of thirteen years. He was bishop anno 1262, [C. Arbr.] also anno 1266, [Cart, et Scon. Aberd.~\ He died in the 7th year of King Alexander III. anno Domini 1267. [H. Boece.'} HUGO BETSHAM, 1267.] Hugo de Benham, or Benin, son to Hugh Benham of that Ilk, in vie. de Kincardin, and uncle, or perhaps brother, to Christian Benham, who bought that estate to her husband, Walter Lundy, ances- tor to Lundy of that Ilk, in vie. de Fife. (Ben in the Gaelic signifies a hill, a diminutive of which is Benin, sig- nifying a little hill, which, receiving an English termination, became Benham, instead of Benne or Benin, as it is spelled in the chart, of Arbroath.) He went to Rome, and was consecrated there. This bishop held a provincial council at Perth, in which the sanctions of the former bishops were ratified, and some new ones decreed, in the presence of the king and the principal persons of the realm ; and the trou- blesome controversy betwixt the clergy and the laity, which had been raised concerning the payment of tithes, was quite THE SEE OF ABERDEEN. 109 taken away by a solemn mutual submission to this prelate. H, is bishop of Aberdeen, and consents to a charter of foun- dation by Alexander Cumin, earl of Buchan, for building an hospital at Turreff, (a pretty village in the shire of Aberdeen,) in the year 1272, [Errol ,] and Hugo is bishop anno 1276, [C. Aberd.] In these times, the bishops of Aberdeen's lodging was ordinarily at Loch-Goul, now cal- led the Bishop's Loch, and this Bishop Benham died in his said lodging in the 29th year of King Alexander III. i. e. anno Dom. 1279, at farthest, [Hect. JBoet.~\ " quo anno, " (says this author,) in insula Lacus de Goulis, ubi vicino- lf rum nemorum amoenitate delectatus senex sese contine- " bat, catarrho exundante, subito interiit." But Cartul. Aberd. says, " Qui suffocatus fuit in lacu de Goyle," i. e. He died of a catarrh, or defluxion, in Loch-Goyle. HENRY CHEYNE, 1281.] Henry le Chen, [C. Arbr.] al. de Cheyn, of the Cheynes of Duffus, (some \vrite Henri- cus le Choin, but the name is Cheyu, I make no doubt,) and nephew to John Cumin Lord of Badenoch, chief oi ? all that great and spreading family, and himself one of the king's council, was the next bishop of this see. He came to be bishop here anno 1281, \Clianonry MS.] Henry is bishop here anno 1290, [Rymer.] He was one of those that swore fealty to King Edward I. of England anno 1296. He was bishop here anno 1285, 1299, Rob. I. 7m 0) I3tio, I7m 0) ggtio, item 1322, [C. Aberbr.] before the year 1309, [Anderson's Independency, App. No. 14.] anno Rob. I. 7 mo , [Cart. Scone.] Henry de Chene is bishop of Aberdeen anno 1321, [R. Cliart. et Car. Aberd.] As the claim concerning the succession to the imperial crown of this realm fell out at this time, and this bishop stuck to the faction of the Cumins, he was forced to fly into England when their affairs turned low ; but the King Ro- bert Bruce having been settled on the throne, he was pleased to permit our prelate to return and possess -his see, in which 110 THE SEE OF ABERDEEN. he employed himself with great care to restore every thing that had been hurt or ruined during the foregoing troubles ; particularly, it is reported, how, out of joy that he was re- ceived into the king^s favour, upon his return home, he ap- plied all the rents of his see, which, during his absence, had accresced to a considerable sum, towards building the stately bridge over the river Don, which, it is said, at the water is seventy-two feet wide, and from the water to the top of the arch sixty feet high. He died after forty-eight years possession of his Episcopate in the same year with King Robert I. i. e. anno Dora. 1329, [Hec. Boet.} But he was alive, and bishop here, if I mistake not, in the year 1333. [Assed. Arbr.~] ALEXANDER KINNINMUND, 1329.] Alexander de Kin- ninmund, doctor of theology, was bishop here 1st Apr. Imo Dav. II. i. e. anno Dom. 1329, [New Erection and Chanonry MS.~\ which last says also, that he sat about ten years. He was bishop anno 1330, 1331, 1335, and 1340, [C. Aberd.] item, anno 1331, \_Arbr. Ass.~] Alexander bi- shop of Aberdeen is witness to King David Bruce, anno reg. 13, [Hay.'] He was bishop anno 1333, [Rymer,~] and anno 1334, [Ibid. V. IV. p. 670.] He is witness to King David II.'s confirmation of the monastery of Arbroath, anno reg. 13, it. 15, i. e. anno Dom. 1342 et 1344, [Cart. Aberbr-l While he was bishop here, the city of Aberdeen was burnt by thirty English ships in the year 1333, \Hect. Boece ;] at which time his own palace, and the houses of the canons were entirely consumed ; after which disaster he did not survive long.* WILLIAM DE DEYN, 1345.] William de Deyn is hi- * In the year 1355, Alexander was one of six ambassadors to England ; Thomas of Fingask, one of his canons, being another. [Rot. Scotia;, 9 Ed. III. 20th December.) THE SEE OF ABERDEEN. Ill shop of this see anno 1345, and anno 1349, [C. Aberd.~\ also anno 1347, [C. Camb. f. 44.] He died anno 1351. [Hect. Boet.~}* JOHN RAIT, 1351.] John Rait, doctor in divinity, was bishop here anno 1351, [Cart. Abcrd. et Invent. Aberd.~\ He is witness to a charter " ultimo Februarii " anno 23, reg. Dav. II."" [Mar.~\ He was bishop here anno 1354, [Kelso.'} He died in the twenty-sixth year of the same king, i. e. 1355. [Hect. Boet.~\ ALEXANDER DE KYXIXMUND, 1357.] Alexander de Kyninmund, second of this name, was elected anno Dom. 1357, [Account oftlie Chanonry, $0. of Aberdeen.'} He was bishop on the 4th September 1359, and before the 29th year of King David II. [Mar ;] also April 3d, anno reg. Roberti II. 3tio, [ibid. Mar.'} He is bishop in the year 1362, [Cart. Morav.] and in anno 1362 and 1366, [Reg. Chart.'} He was present in the Parliament 4th April 1373, [Ruddiman's Answer to Logan, p. 400,] and was bishop 1376, [C. Aberd.~\ This bishop laid the foundation of the new cathedral, but was quickly sent on an embassy from King Robert II. to renew the ancient league with France, and died at Scone, [Hect. Boet.~\ the year after his return, being the 12th of King Robert II. anno Dom. 1382 ; yet he is bishop here anno Dom. 1386, [Cart. Aberd.'} er- roneously ; for ADAM DE TINNIXGHAM, dean of Aberdeen, gets the name of bishop of Aberdeen, 29th day of November 1382, and 12th year of the king, [C. Aberd.~\ and Adam was bishop here, and witness to Margaret countess of Douglas, in the year 1384, [Scone,] and in the same year 1384 and 1388, [C. Aberd.~} * It ii doubtful whether this should be Deyn or Deyer. 112 THE SEE OF ABERDEEN. This bishop was a man well descended, of great prudence, and in high estimation with the king, and without whose advice he would act nothing of moment. He likewise was sent ambassador into France, both before and after he was bi- shop, where he performed his business very successfully. In a treaty betwixt our King Robert II. and the French king, whereof the letters are dated " apud Sconam ultimo " die Martii," anno Dom. 1371, he is designed conjunct ambassador with " Walterus Ep. Glasg. Archibaldus de " Douglas consanguineus noster, et Jacobus de Douglas " Miles," and himself is designed, " Magister Adam de " Tyningham, decanus Ecclesiae Aberdonen." [Rich. Au- gust. Hay, MS.~\ But after his return home, when he was bishop, he was much persecuted by some evil courtiers, particularly Alexander Stewart, Lord Badenoch, a natural son of the king, from whom, however, he was at the last honourably delivered, and died very aged in the year 1390, which year Hector Boece erroneously calls the 3d year of King Robert III. " New Erection 11 makes mention of King Robert III. having given charter to Adam bishop of Aber- deen, 29th November 1402 ; but that cannot be true, there are so many concurring unquestionable vouchers to prove that GILBERT GREENLAW, of an ancient good family in the shire of Berwick, was in the same year, 1390, promoted to this see, [Hect. Boeth.~\ and he was accordingly bishop anno 1390, 1391, 1392, and 1407, [Invent. Aberd.] and in anno 1393, [Cart. Aberd.~\ He was made chancellor of the kingdom anno 1396, [Melros.~\ and Gilbert was bishop here March 18, 1390; November 9- anno reg. Rob. III. 8 VO ; and Janu- ary 21. 1404, [Mar ;] and he is bishop and chan- cellor August 17. anno reg. Rob. III. 9, January 21. 1404, and July 2. 1410, [Ibid.] Gilbert was bishop here in the second year of King Robert III. item 1400, 1403, 1405, 1411, 1413, and 1415, [Reg. Char,] and he THE SEE OF ABERDEEN. 113 is bishop and chancellor anno 1400, 1406, and 1411, [Ibid.] He was bishop and chancellor 1399, [Cart. Glasg-.] and 1400, [Cart. Cambusl'.] also 1399 and 1413, [Dipl et Nu- mism.] He is bishop 1400 and 1408, [Errol ;] both bishop and chancellor in the 14th year of the king, i. e. annoDom. 1404, [Paisley;] and he is bishop anno 1419, [Cart. Aberd.~\ From aD which it is evident, that Hector Boece must be mistaken, when he makes the former bislrjp Adam Tyninghanrs death to have been in the 3d year of this King Robert III. and the New Erection no less so, when it makes him alive still in 1402. This prelate was likewise sent on embassy to Charles VII. king of France, by Robert duke of Albany, and governour of Scotland, in the year 1423. After his return home, finding the governour dead, and many things running into disorder, he retired to his bishopric, resigned the office of chancellor, and died in the year 1424. As a testimony of his favour to him, the king presented this bishop with a silver cross, in which was con- tained a bit of the wooden cross on which the apostle St Andrew had been crucified. The gift bears date at Elliots- town, 4th May, the 14th year of the king. [Cart. Aberd.] HEXRY DE LEIGHTOX, 1424.] Henry de Leigh ton, doctor of both laws, and at that time bishop of Moray, was translated from that see to this of Aberdeen in the year 1424 or 1425, [Vid. Moray.] He was bishop anno 1425, 1427, 1433, 1434, 1438, 1440 ; and anno 1469, " Henricus" is " quondam Ep. Aberdonen." [Iiw. Aberd.] He was bi- shop anno 1428 and 1430, [Cart. Aberd.] He was bishop June 26. 1439, [Mar.] This bishop was one of the com- missioners sent to London for negociating the ransom of King James I. and returned home with him. He died, as it is said, in the year 1441.* * Henry is bishop of Aberdeen 9th June 1125. Rot. Scot. 5d Henry VI. His name occurs as a witness 4th May 1441. H 114 THE SEE OF ABERDEEN. INGERAM LINDSAY, 1442.] Ingeram Lindsay was the following bishop, and succeeded immediately, [CJmnonry MS.] Ingeram was bishop of Aberdeen in the year 1442, {Reg. Cluir.] and 1446, {Writs of the Laird of Skew.] He was bishop here anno 1448, 1452, 1454, anno reg. 18, and 1456, {Inv. Aberd.] and anno 1453, {Assed. Ar- broath.] He was bishop liere anno 1458, {Cart. Aberd.] and it is *eported that he should have died this same year 1458. He was a very studious and hospitable person, and ruled his diocese very prudently. He caused lay on the roof on the high church, and paved the floor with free stone. At last falling into the king's displeasure, for refus- ing admission to some persons whom the king had present- ed to benefices, he died at Aberdeen, much lamented, and was buried with great solemnity. He sat bishop seventeen years. {Hay.]* THOMAS SPENCE, 1459-] Thomas Spence,or Spens, for- merly bishop of Galloway, and keeper of the privy-seal, was translated to this see of Aberdeen in the year 1459, at which time he laid down the office of Privy-seal. Thomas was bishop here anno 1459, {Errol and Cart. Aberbr.] In the 23d year of King James II. " Thomam tune episcopum " Candidae Casae, nunc episcopum Aberdonen." {Reg. Chart. B. VI. No. 118.] He was bishop of Aberdeen anno 1460, {Hid.'] 1461, {Inv. Aberd.] 1467, {Reg. Cluir.] In the year 1468 he received the privy-seal again, and held it till anno 1471, when it was bestowed on William Tullcch bishop of Orkney ; and, accordingly, 1468 and 1470, he is keeper of the privy-seal, [Reg. CJuir.] also 1469, he is * seer. sig. cust." {Inv. Aberd.~\ He is bishop 1473, " nos- " traeque consecrationis 23 mo - < " {Inv. Aberd.] March 26. 1473, Thomas was bishop here, and William bishop of Orkney keeper of the privy-seal, {Clackmanan.] Thomas * In 1454 he was a presbyter, and the Pope's accoljte. Rot. Scot. 10 Maii, 12 Henn VI. THE SEE OF ABERDEEN. 115 was bishop 1474, [Cart, Glasg.] also 1474 and 1478, [Reg- Chart.] This bishop was a person singularly well turned for business, and was accordingly employed in seve- ral legations. He erected an hospital at Edinburgh, and falling sick, he died, and was buried in the Trinity college church, at the foot of Leith Wynd, near to his hospital. His death happened on the 15th of April 1480. See the Bishops of Galloway.* ROBERT BLACADER, 1480.] Robert Blacader was first a prebendary of Glasgow and rector of Cardross, and being then at Rome, with a public character from King James III. at the time of the former bishop's death, he was con- secrated bishop of this see by the Pope Sixtus IV. ; and after he had succeeded in the business for which he had been sent, he returned home, and was honourably received by all the clergy and people of his see ; and the king entertained so great an opinion of him, that he made him a privy coun- sellor ; and being a person of great knowledge and dexteri- ty in business, he was quickly advanced to the see of Glas- gow, where see more of him. } WILLIAM ELPHINSTOX, 1484.] William Elphinston, the son of Mr William Elphinston, a younger son of the family of Elphinston, burgess of the city of Glasgow, and the root of the Elphinstons of Blythswood. This gentle- man, the father, after he became a widower, thought fit (from a principle of devotion no doubt) to enter into holy orders, and was first rector of Kirkmichael, and at length archdeacon of Teviotdale 4 , in which station he died, in the * There is an effigy of Bishop Spence, or Spens, in the beautiful collegiate church of Roslin. f For a curious notice relative to Bishop Blacader, see note H. in Appendix. 4 The see of Glasgow being likewise of great extent, its bishops found themselves obliged to have archdeacons in mote places than one ; and one of these archdeacons had the oversight and title of Teviotdale. H 2 116 .THE SEE OF ABERDEEN. year 1486, after he had the comfort of seeing his son bi- shop of Aberdeen. This worthy prelate was born in the city of Glasgow, in the year 1437. It is said that he had from his childhood remarkably good dispositions, which his parents observing, were careful to give him a good education in the newly erected university of Glasgow, in which he became master of arts in the twentieth year of his age. Afterwards apply- ing himself to the study of divinity, he was made rector of Kirkmichael, within the city of Glasgow. Four years after he went over into France, and studied the civil and canon laws, of both which he commenced doctor, and came to be in such reputation, tliat he was chosen professor of laws, first in the university of Paris, and then at Orleans. After nine years study abroad, he returned home in the year 1471, at the earnest request of friends, especially Bishop Muirhead, who made him parson of Glasgow, and official of his diocese ; and the new university, where he had been bred, as a testimony of their respect, made choice of him for their rector. After the death of Bishop Muirhead, he was made official of Lothian by Archbishop Schevez of St. An- drews ; and no doubt it has been for the high reputation of his wisdom that we find him even then sitting in the Par- liaments, [Rolls of Parl. anno 1478.] He was next sent into France, for the composing of some misunderstandings which were likely to break out between Lewis XI. of that nation and our King James III., which Dr. Elphinston, the Earl of Buchan, and Bishop Livingston managed so dextrously, that the old league and amity was renewed, and all occasions of discord quite removed. Upon the doc- tor's return, he was made archdeacon of Argyle, anno 1479; and on the 18th March 1482-3, he sits in Par- liament, under the designation of " elect, et confirmat. Rossen." The following year he was translated to the see of Aberdeen ; and some one is Episc. Aberdonen. in the rolls of Parliament, Feb. 25. 1483-4. In that character THE SEE OF ABERDEEN. 117 he went the same year one of the commissioners from Scot- land to treat of a truce with England, and a marriage be- twixt the prince of Scotland and the lady Anne, the niece of King Richard III. He is witness to a charter of King James III. 19th May 1485, [J/ar.] And when the Earl of Richmond came to the crown of England, by the name of Henry VII., the bishop of Aberdeen was again sent with other ambassadors into England, who, on the 3d July 1486, agreed to a cessation of anus for three years, " ab ortu solis " tertiae diei mensis instantis Julii, per tres annos sequentes, " viz. ad ortum solis tertiae diei mensis Julii, qui erit in an- " no Domini 1489." Several other things were touched by the plenipotentiaries of both nations, which may be seen in Rymer's Foedera Angliae. When affairs at home came to be troubled between King James III. and his nobles, the bishop of Aberdeen endeavoured all he could to compose matters ; and in no case did he ever desert his injured so- vereign, but adhered 10 him to the very last ; and he un- dertook a new journey into England, to try what he could do with that king to bring about a reconciliation. But as princes seldom think it their interest to compose differences amongst their neighbours, the bishop returned without his errand. However, King James was so well persuaded of his integrity, that he did presently constitute him lord chancel- lor on the 21st February 1487-8, which office he held till the unfortunate death of the king in the same year, three months after he was bishop here and chancellor, 1488, [ Morav.~\ After this, he returned to his diocese, employing himself in the reforming of any abuses he found amongst the clergy, and in composing a book of canons, extracted from the ancient canons : but he had not well set about this when he was called to the Parliament, which met at Edinburgh on the 6th October the same year, where he assisted at the co- ronation of the new kino; The Earl of BothwelL who had O 7 been deepiy engaged against the late king, and was now become prime minister, fearing that our prelate would not 118 THE SEE OF ABERDEEN. concur in all his measures, took care to have him sent into Germany, with a proposal of marriage between the young king and the prince & Margaret, daughter to the emperor ; but, before he reached Vienna, that lady was espoused in marriage to the prince of Spain. However, the bishop, that he might not return empty, contracted a firm and a lasting peace between his master and the States of the Low Coun- tries. William was bishop here August 12. 1489, August 31. 1490, and May 20. 1491, [Mar.] Upon his return home from his last embassy he was made Lord Privy-seal in the year 1492 ; and the same year he was once more clothed with a public character, and he and his collegues met with the English ambassadors at Edinburgh, and, on the 21st June, prolonged the truce till the last of April 1501. He was bishop here, and Lord Privy-seal, the year 1492, [Cart. Morav.] He was present in the Parliament holden at Edinburgh in the month of June 1493, and was one of the lords auditors of causes, [Cart. Paisley.] He was bishop of this see anno 1496, [Aberbr.] He was keeper of the seal the same year, [Cart. Cambusk.~\ and he was keeper of the privy-seal and bishop here Sept. 11. 1497, anno reg. 10, [Clack.] He was bishop Aug. 18. 1500, April 22. and July 10. 1502, and Privy-seal Sept. 11. 1509, an- no reg. 22. [Mar.] William was bishop of Aberdeen July 10. 1502, 5th indiction, and 10th of Pope Alexander VI., also keeper of the privy-seal Feb. 3. 1506, anno reg. 19 mo - [Clackmannan ,] and he was keeper of the privy- seal and bishop here anno Domino 1506, et reg. 19- [Cart. Dunferm.] also Feb. 11. 1511, and Aug. 26. 1513, anno reg. 26. [J/ar.] The commotions of the state being now appeased at home, the bishop of Aberdeen set him- self to the execution of a design he had long intended, which was to erect an university in the city of Old Aberdeen, where the cathedral stands ; and he prevailed with the king to write to the Pope for leave, by his papal authority, to begin the work. The Pope Alexander VI. sent over a bull in the THE SEE OF ABERDEEN. 119 year 1494, by which he erects " Universitatem," &c. ; and the bishop employed himself much for some time afterwards in founding and settling this new university, being assisted therein with the king's letters-patent under the great seal. This prelate, in the intervals from public business, wrote some lives of the Scots saints, and likewise a history of the kingdom, which is extant in manuscript in the Bodleian li- brary ; but, I am told, it labours under the general error of books written in former times. After the fatal death of King James IV. Bishop Elphinston wag greatly afflicted; yet the queen-dowager, then regent, intended to have set him at the head of church affairs, notwithstanding his great age, upon the vacancy of the see of St Andrews, (the pri- mate having lost his life in the battle with his father the king,) and for that end did write to the Pope, [Ep. Reg: Scot.] But before that was got accomplished, the bishop having been called upon to be present in Parliament, sick- ened on the road to Edinburgh, and died the sixth day af- ter his arrival thither, being the 25th of October 151 4, aged 77, [Obituar. Glasg-.] His body, by his own direction, was interred in the collegiate church founded by himself, be- fore the high altar. Every person that has mentioned this worthy prelate has done it with the utmost regard, Mr Buchanan alone excepted. ALEXANDER GORDOX, 151-.] Alexander Gordon, third son of James Gordon, laird of Haddo, (ancestor to the Earls of Aberdeen) was first rector of Fetteresso in the shire of Mearns, next chantor or precentor of the see of Moray, and at last was consecrated bishop of Aberdeen. This was a person of good learning and of a grave disposi- tion. He enjoyed the place but a short time, for he died of a hectic fever, 29th June 1518. GAVIN DUNBAR, 1518.] Gavin Dunbar, son to Sir 120 THE SEE OF ABERDEEN. James Dunbar of Cumnock, by Jane, 5 eldest daughter of the Earl of Sutherland, [History of the Family o^f Suther- land^ and uncle to Gavin Dunbar archbishop of Glasgow, [Cart. Cambusk.} was dean of Moray anno 1458, [C. Mor.} He is " Decan. Morav. rotulor. ac regist. et Concilii Cleric, anno regni 14." [Inv. Aberd} He was dean of Moray in the year 1502, [Mar. et ClacJcm.} clerk-register, April 24. 1502, [Mar.} March 13. 1503-4, he is dean of Moray, and clerk-register, [Reg. Chart. B. 14.] Gavin Dunbar is archdeacon of St Andrews, and lord-register, 18th March 1503, [Charter King James IV. to Wood of Balbegno, which Bishop Keith has viewed.] Feb. 3. anno regni 19 no , 1506, Gavin Dunbar is archdeacon of St Andrews, clerk of the rolls, and register, \Clackmanan ;] December 20. 1507, he is archdeacon of St Andrews, [Mar;] Feb. 11. 1511, he is styled clerk-register, [/fo'd] and August 12. 1513, he is archdeacon of St Andrews, [Ibid.] He became bi- shop of Aberdeen in the year 1518, [Chanonry Aberd. MS.} He was bishop here, and lord-register, anno 1525, [Reg. Char.} March 4. 1527, anno regni 15. [Mar ;} anno 1529, [C. Mar;} anno 1521, 1524, 1525, and 16th March 1528-9, [C. Cambusk} He is bishop and lord-register anno 1524, 1527, 1529, [C. Aberd} and he was lord-register in the 10th year of King James V., and bishop anno 1531, [C. Cambusk} Also Gavin was bishop here anno 1521, which he calls the 2d year of his consecration, 1519, 1523, 1529, and 1531, [Cart. Aberd.} 1520 is called consecr. 3% 1529 consecr. ll mo , and 1530 consecr. 12 m , [Invent. Aberd.} It is said, this bishop first gave advice to Hector Boece, principal of the college in Aberdeen, to write the history of our nation. He built the stately bridge over the river Dee, consisting of seven arches, which had been pro- jected by Bishop Elphinston ; and he also endowed an hos- 5 She is expressly called Elizabeth Sutherland, by Bishop Gaviu himself, [(.h. Morav.] THE SEE OF ABERDEEN. 121 pital for twelve poor men, with a preceptor, in the year 1531-2. Over the gate of this hospital is this prescription, " Per Executores ;"" and the following inscription is on the south side of the oratory, viz. " Duodecim pauperibus " domum hanc Reverendus Pater Gavinus Dunbar, hujus " almae sedis quondam pontifex, aedificari jussit, anno a " Christo nato 1532. QiZ 'Xofyc,?' 1 So the good bishop has died this same year, [Chan. MS.] and on the 9th day of March.* WILLIAM STEWART, 1532.] William Stewart, son to Sir Thomas Stewart of Minto, of the family of Garlies, by Isabel, his wife, one of the daughters and co-heirs of Sir Walter Stewart of Arthurly, a brother of the family of Castlemilk. He was born in the city of Glasgow, about the year 1479 ; was doctor of laws, afterwards parson of Loch- maben, then rector of Ayr, and a prebendary of Glasgow. In the year 1527, he was preferred to the deanry of Glas- gow, a place of great revenue. In the year 1528, he sits in Parliament ; and in the year 1530 he was made lord- treasurer, and provost of Lincluden, and he was elected bishop of Aberdeen in the year 1532 ; 6 and soon after he was sent, together with Sir Adam Otterburn, the king^s ad- vocate, on an embassy to England, which was performed both with honour and success, [Feed. Ang. it. Reg. CJiar. ad annum 1533-4.] He resigned the treasury after seven years. William was bishop here in September 1533, [Cart. Aberbr.] and bishop and treasurer 1535, [C. Cam- busk.] He was bishop here anno 1536. " Consecrationis " 4 l . 1537, consecr. 5 to . 1539, consecr. 7 mo > 1540, 1543, " 1544, et 1545, [Invent. Aberd.~\ He died, they say, on * For a singular entry in the council-register of Aberdeen in regard to this bishop, see Appendix, Note I. 6 This see was vacant, 17th March 1551-2. It was vacant 14th Septem- ber 1532, and till 28th September the same year. [C. 122 THE SEE OF ABERDEEN. the 17th April, but certainly some time within that month, 1545. [Ep. Reg. Scot. V. II. p. 250.] WILLIAM GOIIDOX, 15 .] William Gordon, a son of the house of Huntly, was probably the next bishop of this see ; since we are certain that he had been recommended to the Pope by the lord-governor to be coadjutor to the former bi- shop just at the time that he happened to die ; at which time also William Gordon is " nobilem adolescentem," a youth on- ly, [Ep.Reg. Scot.] After his return from France, whither he had gone to pursue his studies, he was made rector of Clat, in the shire of Aberdeen. He was bishop here anno 1550, [Errol,] 1552, [Reg: Char.] and William is bishop of Aberdeen anno 1576, [Tack of Teinds set by him, in the hands of Burnet of Kirkhill.] He died at Aberdeen in the year 1577. [Hay.]* Though some have alleged that there was another bishop of the same family and name who preceded this William Gordon in this same see, yet I think it is next to certain that this is the very same person who immediately succeed- ed to Bishop Stewart, from many papers and deeds record- ed in three old original books wrote on vellum, pertaining to the bishopric of Aberdeen, which I have perused, and which I quote by the name of Inventary of Aberdeen. In these books, I say, this bishop, William Gordon, calls the year 1547 the first year of his consecration, and in many subsequent years the same date of his consecration is re- gularly observed. And as this bishop happened to be in France in the year 1552, and found it necessary for him to constitute a vicar-general in his bishopric during his ab- sence, for this end he gave commission to Robert bishop of Orkney, and James Gordon chancellor of the see of Moray, to perform that office. And since father Hay tells * Sec Note K. in Appendix. THE SEE OF ABERDEEN. 123 us, that the preceding William Gordon who, he pretends, was bishop of Aberdeen, had been formerly chancellor of Moray, it is almost beyond question, that the delegation of vicar-general of the see of Aberdeen has led him into the mistake of two bishops of Aberdeen of the same family. The different names, William and James, are but a small objection against this reasoning, especially since no bishop of this see is to be seen marked through all the year 1546, which was the year that came in betwixt the death of Bishop Stewart and Bishop William Gordon's consecration. For the sake of those that are curious, I subjoin here a copy of Bishop GORDON'S COMMISSION to the Bishop of ORKNEY and the Chancellor of MORAY, taken word for word from the fore-mentioned original Books. WILLELMUS miseratione divina Aberdonensis Episcopus, dilectis confratribus nostris, Roberto Episcopo Orchaden. Jacobo Gordon cancellario Moravien. conjunctim et divisim, salutem in Domino sempiternam. Quia variis reipublicae et nostris arduis praepediti negotiis, et propter diversa im- pedimenta, quare in singulis negotiis ad nostram jurisdic- tionem et Episcopatum Aberdonensem spectan. et concer- nen. commode et personaliter interesse non valemus, de ves- tris igitur discretionibus, industriis, et literarum scientiis, plenam fiduciam in Domino sperantes, exinde quod ea quae vobis duximus committenda, pro justitiae expeditione et ex- ecutione facturi sitis : quia, ut informamur, comperimus Joannem Innes, filium honorabilis quondam viri Roberti Innermerky, feodatorium omnium et singularum terrarum de Larquhy, Pettorfay, cum brasina et suis pertinentiis, molendino de Petglassy, terris molendinariis, cum pastura ct focalibus, et aliis necessariis ad dictum molendinum so- liiis ct consuetis ; una cum astricta multura, et lie K naif- ship totius dominii de Murthlack, viz. villarum de Larquhy 12-4 THE SEE OF ABERDEEN. et Pettorfay, ac crofti brasinae ejusdem ballandi Pert-beg cum perfinentiis ; easdem terras cum pertinentiis resignatu- rum, et simpliciter dimissurum, in favorem nobilis et prae- potentis doniini Joannis comitis de Athol, suorumque hae- redum et assignatorum, pro nonnullis aliis terri^ permuta- tionis et excambii causa : Propterea dan. et conceden. vobis, et vestmm cuilibet, conjunctim, et divisim, nostram omni- niodam et irrevocabilem potestatem et mandatum speciale, pro nobis, et nomine nostro, hujusmodi resignationem prae- dictar. terrarum, cum pertinen. in favorem praedicti nobilis domini comitis, suorumque haeredum et assignatorum, re- cipien. et admitten. qua recepta et legitime facta, ac per vos admissa, eundem nobilem dominum comitem, in locum dicti Joannis, in tenentem ad dictas terras, cum pertinen. iniponend. surrogand. et admittend. cartam, praeceptum, et alias evidentias necessarias, super dictis terris, cum pertinen. in favorem praedicti nobilis domini, suorum haeredum et assignatorum, facien. et componen. easdemque subscribend. et sigilland. cum solennitatibus in similibus usitatis, solitis, et consuetis. Proviso etiam, quod ad id accedat consensus decani et capituli 'ecclesiae nostrae cathedralis Aberdonen. ut moris est : caeteraque omnia alia et singula, faciend. di- cend. gerend. et exercend. quae in praemissis, et circa ea, necessaria fuerint, seu quomodolibet opportuna; etquaenos facere potuerimis, si praesentes personaliter interessemus ; et quae mandatum magis exigant speciale quam praesenti- bus sit expressum, quae de jure vel consuetudine regni Sco- tiae pertinere dignoscuntur. Promittendo insuper, ut quic- quid in praemissis per vos, aut aliquem vestrum, rite, et justitia median te, duxeritis faciend. seu rite duxerit, favente Deo, irrevocabiliter observari faciemus. Nostram hac vice irrevocabilem potestatem committimus, tenore praesentium. Datum sub nostra subscriptione manuali, una cum sigillo nostro, apud Lutetiam Parisiorum, decimo tertio die men- sis Septembris, anno Domini millesimo quingentesimo quin- quagesimo secundo, et nostrae consecrationis anno sexto. THE SEE OF ABERDEEN. 125 Coram his testibus, Reverendo Domino Jacobo Stewart, Priore Sancti Andr. Willelmo Keyth de Balmur, Magis- tro Joanne Watsone burgen. de Aberden, Magistris Joanne Davidson vicario de Nyg, et Alexandro Skeyn notario pub- lico, cum diversis aliis : Et ita subscribe, WILLELMUS, Episcopus Abirdonen. JV. B. As the above commission is inserted in die transaction which the bishop of Orkney made and finished in favours of the Earl of Athole, by virtue of the bishop of Aberdeen's commission, so the beginning of the writer's assedation to this Earl runs in the following words, viz. " Omnib. hanc Cartam visuris et audituris, Robertus mi- " seratione divina Orchaden. Episcopvis, ac Vicarius-gene- " rails Abirdonen. Episcopo ejusdem in remotis agen. salu- " tem in Domino sempiternam." And in the end of die writ he subscribes, " R. Orchaden. Episcopus vicarius qui " supra, apud Abirdyne, die mensis Januarii an. Dom. " 1552." I IXVENTARY of the SILVER WORK, &c. of the Cathedral Church of Aberdeen, delivered to the keeping of the Ca- nons by Bishop WILLIAM GORDON, 7th July 1559, and subscribed by them. lib. oz. Impr. To Mr Robert Erskine, dean, in chandlers, (candlesticks,) chalices, paxes, and a cross, 113 ounces, 113f To Mr Alexander Seton, chancellor, in basins, cen- sers, and chalices, 89ounces, 89 To Mr John Stewart, archdean, 92 ounces, - 92 To Mr James Strachan, parson of Belhelvie, 91 ounces, _ 91 To Mr Henry Lumsden, parson of Kinkell, 90 ounces, , _ 90 126 THE SEE OF ABERDEEN. lib. oz. To Mr William Hay, parson of Turreff, 91 ounces, - 91 To Alexander Anderson, parson of Mortlich, 83 ounces, 83 To Mr William Campbell, parson of Tullinessel, 24 ounces 24 To Mr Patrick Myreton, treasurer, 894 ounces, besides a gold chain, and great ring 89^ To Mr John Leslie, parson of Oyne, the image of the Virgin Mary, 114 ounces - 114 To Mr James Gordon, parson of Lonmey, 16 ounces, 16 Besides, to the treasurer, five chalices for daily use, and two crowns, with precious stones in them, delivered to the Earl of Huntlie in custody, upon his bond of custody and restitution, given No- vember 13. 1559. Cautioners for him, Wil- liam Leslie of Kirkhill, and George Barclay of Gairlie. Item, A chalice of pure gold, with the paten there- of, three pointed diamonds in the foot thereof, and two rubies of Bishop Dunbar's gift, 52 ounces 52 Delivered to the said earl, being chancellor of Scot- land, in custody, and upon restitution within ten days premonition by the bishop, dean, and chap- ter of Aberdeen, and their successors, the species following, under pain of God's curse ; and the band which was given ordained to be registrate in the commissary of Edinburgh's books : Item, A great eucharist, double overgilt, 141b. 2 oz. artificially wrought 14 2 Item, Two silver chandlers, (candlesticks,) 61b. 14 oz. and of an oz 6 14 Item, A holy water font, with stick of silver, 6 Ib. 12oz 6 12 Item, A silver cross, part overgilt, 6 Ib. 8 oz 6 8 THE SEE OF ABERDEEN. 127 lib. oz. Item, A book, with the written Evangel, of the which the one side is silver double overgilt, 56 oz., or 3lb. 8 oz., all these former marked with Bishop Gavin Dunbar's arms 3 8 Item, The bishop's great mitre, all overset with orient pearls and stones, and silver overgilt, the hail mitre extending to 5 Ib. 15 oz. weight,. .5 15 o o y Item, Two staves of silver, pertaining to the bi- shop's pontifical, the one weighing 6 7 The other, with the king's arms, 2 Ib. 13 oz 2 13 VESTMENTS. Item, Six caps of cloth of gold ; three of red cloth of gold, champed with velvet ; one of white cloth of geld, champed with velvet ; another of gold, champed with blue velvet. Item, Forbes 1 kaip, and ane of carbuncle. Item, Five red velvet ; four green velvet ; four blue velvet ; five white damask ; two green champed velvet ; an old cloth of gold ; three niort-capes of double worset. FOR THE ALTAR. Impr. A frontail of gold and green velvet ; another of blue velvet, with images of gold ; two of carbuncle ; two of arras ; one of fustian ; one of linen. Two napkins, and a rich hand-towel. Four cushions of cloth of gold, lined with green velvet ; two of gold and silk ; six of champed red velvet ; four of old cloth of gold. Item, The pontifical, viz. a chesabil ; four tunicks ; three stoles ; five favonis of cloth of gold ; five albs ; five amits, with their paruts of cloth of gold. Item, A chesabil ; two tunicles ; two stoles ; three fawnois of cloth of gold, and red velvet, with three albs and three amites, with paruts thereto of the same stuff. Item, A chesabil and two tunicles ; a stole and fawnois of white velvet and gold , three albs ; three paruts ; three amits of white velvet and cloth of gold. Item, A chesabil ; two tu- nicks ; two stoles ; three fawnois ; three albs ; three amites, THE SEE OF ABERDEEN. with their paruts, all of red velvet. Item, As many of green velvet, with albs and amits, &c. Item, As many of blue velvet, with albs and amites conform. Item, A stand of white silk, and the chesabil with pearls, with albs, stoles, fawnois, and pertinents conform. Item, A stand of brown -silk, and cloth of gold, with stoles, albs, fawnois, and pa- ruts conform. Item, A stand of carbuncle, with stoles, albs, fawnois, and paruts conform. Item, A stand of peant silk, with the like pertinents conform. Item, Another of white damas, with all pertinents conform. Item, A chesa- bil of white fustian, with stoles and fawnois thereto. Item, A mort stand of black damas, with like pertinents conform. Item, Another of double worset, with like per- tinents conform. Item, A stand of red scarlet, and another of brown chainlet, with like former pertinents. Item, A great belt of green silk, knopped with gold, and another of silk and gold. Item, Five belts of blue and white birget thread. Item, A corporal case, with a cover of cloth of gold, with red damas hose for my lord's pontifical ; and two corporals, one great stole, with two tunicles of white da- mas, and two shoes of cloth of gold. Item, A baikin of green broig satin, with three other baikins. Item, The vail, with the towes ; a vail for the round loft, and for our Lady. Item, Curtains, two, red and green, for the high altar. Item, The covering of the sacrament-house, with an antipend for the Lady altar of blue and yellow broig satin. Item, An antipend for the sacrament- house, with a Dornick towel to the same. Item, A capin for the sepul- chre of damas, and another of double worsted, with a great verdure that lays before the altar. Item, Three banners for the procession, and two burriels with their brists, with a bairn's cap for the cross ; four tunicles and albs for the bairns. Item, The hangers of arras-work of three pieces for the choir. Item, Three mort-caps. Unto the obligation of restitution of all which foresaids, within ten days after premonition, witnesses, John Leslie of THE SEE OF ABERDEEN. 129 Balquhain, William Leslie, his son, William Seton of Mel- drum, Mr Duncan Forbes of Monimusk, Alexander Gor- don of Abergeldie, Alexander Leslie of Pitcapel, John Gordon of Craig, Sir Patrick Ogston, Alexander Paip, and Mr Nicol Hay, notars-public. [Richard Augustine Hay.] " We, Mr Patrick Rutherford, Alexander Knows, John Lowson, and Gilbert Molyson, burgesses of Aberdeen, grant us to have received, by the hands of Gilbert Meinzies, elder, Gilbert Colyson, Mr George Middleton, and the said Gilbert Molyson, burgesses of the said burgh, at com- mand and ordinance of the provost and haill council, the great Eucharist chalices and silver work, together with the caps and ornaments under specified, of St Nicholas parish kirk in Aberdeen, in keeping, whilk we oblige us to restore to the said provost and council convened in semblable man- ner as they were, by their ordinance, when they require us therefor : To the which we oblige us, our heirs, executors, and assignees, conjunctly and severally, leilly and truly, but fraud or guile." Here follows the IXVENTARY of the said Work and Or- naments. lib. oz. Imprimis, The Eucharist, of 4 lib. 2 oz. silver,... 4 2 Item, A chalice of our Lady of Pity in the vault, 19 oz. i. e. 1 lib. 3 oz 1 3 Item, Our Lady's chalice of the south isle, 19i oz. i. . llib. 3 oz 1 3 Item, St Peter's chalice, 15^ oz - 151 Item, Two pair of censers of 38 oz. i. e. 2 lib. 6 oz. 2 6 Item, Four crowats and a little ship, of 16| oz. i. e. 1 lib. oz 1 -| Item, A chalice of St John the Evangelist, 30 oz. i. e. 1 lib. 14; oz 1 14| Item, The hospital chalice, 17^ oz. i. e. 1 lib. 1| oz. 1 1 Item, Our Lady's chalice of the Brig chapel, 20 oz. t . e . 1 lib. 4 oz 1 4 130 THE SEE OF ABERDEEN. lib. oz. Item, St Duthac's chalice, 1S| oz - 12| Item, St Nicolas's chalice, 394-02. L e. 2 lib. 7 2 oz. 2 7 /fern, St Clement's chalice, 10| oz - 10 Item, The Rude chalice, 16 oz. or 1 lib 1 - Item, A cap of fine cloth of gold. Item, Another of cloth of gold, freezed with red velvet. Item, A cap ; a chesabil with two tunicles, hail fur- nished with red velvet, flowered, and indented with gold. Item, A cap and chesabil, with tu- nicles haill furnished with gold, freezed on green velvet. Item, Two caps of red velvet, orpheist with gold, 20 -J " At Aberdeen, the 15th January 1559, [i. e. 1560,] be- fore thir witnesses, Mr Thomas Meinzies, Alexander Chal- mer, William Robison, goldsmith, William Barclay, Sir John Colyson, David Colyson, Sir William Walcarch, Mr John Kennedy, notar-public, with divers others, " Haec " est vera copia principals obligations, nil in effectu va- " riato aut mutato, collation, per me notarium publicum " subscript. Extract, de libro actor, curiae burgi de Aber- " deen, in eodem registrat. Ita est Magister Joannes Ken- ** nedy notar. ac scriba curiae dicti burgi, manu propria." [Richard Augustine Hay.~\ THE SEE OF ABERDEEN. 131 REFORMATION. 1. MR DAVID CiraiNGHAM, 7 son to the laird of Cuning- ham-head, and sub-dean of Glasgow, a good man, and learn- ed, was preferred to this see by King James VI. in the year 1577. He was employed in a legation to the king of Den- mark and several of the German princes, which he dis- charged with great fidelity and reputation. He died anno 1603. 2. PETER BLACKBURN," rector of St Nicholas' church in New Aberdeen. He died anno 1615. 3. ALEXANDER FORBES, of the house of Armurdo, bi- shop of Caithness, was translated from thence to the see of Aberdeen, and died anno 1618. 7 Spotiswood MS. says, Mr David Cunningham, of the house of Cunning- ham-head, was next preferred, by the intercession of James earl of Morton, on whom he attended as chaplain in the time of his regency. A learned man, and of singular good qualities ; but the times were so troublesome as he had not the occasion to shew himself, or do any good. Yet was he a little before his death employed by King James in an embassage to the princes of Ger- many, which he discharged with good commendation. He died at Aberdeen in the month of August 1600. He was bishop here anno 1583. [Errol.] 8 Mr Peter Blackburn, born at Glasgow, where some years he had re- gented teaching philosophy in the college there, and afterwards was chosen minister of Aberdeen, succeeded in his place by the gift of King James, a man of good parts ; but whilst he studied to please the opposers of the Epis- copal state, he made himself ungracious to both, and so lost his authority. He departed this life in the same city, in the month of June 1616. Spotis. MS. 9 Mr Alexander Forbes, parson of Fettercarne, and bishop of Caithness, a man well born and of good inclination, was after him formally elected by the chapter, and translated to this see ; but he lived not much above a year. Spttinaood MS. i 2 132 THE SEE OF ABERDEEN. 4. PATRICK FORBES of Corse, 10 an immediate descendant of the family of Forbes, in the tune of King James III. was well educated in human learning, and always inclined to virtue. For a good space he refused to enter into holy orders ; but at last, when he was 48 years old, viz. anno 1612, he was prevailed upon, a very singular accident hav- ing intervened, which made him then yield, namely the ear- nest obtestation of a religious minister in the neighbour- hood, who, in a fit of melancholy, had stabbed himself, but survived to lament his error. He continued pastor of the village of Keith in Strathisla, and diocese of Murray, (the same place where the above misfortune had fallen out,) until the year 1618, March 24. when he was unanimously elected bishop of Aberdeen, with the concurrent voice of all ranks, and the recommendation of the king. In this office he behaved himself to the applause of all men, and died, much regretted, on the 28th March, being Easter- even, in the year 1635, aged 71, and was interred in the south aisle of his cathedral. He wrote a Commentary upon the Book of Revelations. . He was wont to visit his diocese in a very singular retinue, scarce any person hearing of him until he came into the church on the Lord's day ; and ac- cording as he perceived the respective ministers to behave themselves he gave his instructions to them. [See the Pre- face to Bishop Bedel's Life, et Vitam R. V. Joh. Forbesii a Corse, Amstel. 1703.]* 5. ADAM BALLENDEN, son of Sir John Ballendenof Auch- noul, who was justice-clerk. He was first minister at Fal- kirk anno 1608, where he continued till the year 1615, at which time he was promoted to the see of Dumblane, and 10 To whom succeeded Patrick Forbes of Corse, now In place, whose con- tinuance all good men do wish, and that he may long and still happily rule this see, [Spotiswood MS.] Patrick was bishop anno 1627, [Errol.] * See Note K. in Appendix. THE SEE OF ABERDEEN. 133 from thence to the see of Aberdeen anno 1635. Here he sat till he was deprived and excommunicated, with the rest of his order, by the wild Assembly at Glasgow anno 1638 after which he withdrew into England, where he died in a short time. 6. DAVID MITCHEL, born in the shire of Mearns, was a minister in the city of Edinburgh, and deposed by the As- sembly 1638 ; after this he went into England, where he got into a benefice. And after the Restoration, viz. July 9. 1661, he was created doctor of divinity at Oxford, being then, by the chancellor of England's letters, one of the pre- bendaries of Westminster. These letters say, " That Mr " David Mitchel of Aberdeen is a person very learned and " honest, and, from the beginning of the troubles, has been " a great sufferer for the cause of his Majesty and the " church," &c. Episcopacy being restored in Scotland, he was consecrated bishop of Aberdeen at St. Andrews, with Bishop Wiseheart of Edinburgh, on the 1st June 1662. He lived not bishop a full year ; for he died of a fever next year, and was buried in the cathedral church of St. Ma- carius in Old Aberdeen. [Athenae Oxonienses.] 7. ALEXANDER BURNET. [See for this prelate in the Sees of St. Andrews and Glasgow.] He sat bishop of Aberdeen little above a year, being from this translated to Glasgow anno 1664. 8. PATRICK SCOUGAL, parson of Salton in East-Lothian, and son to Sir John Scougal of that Ilk, was next preferred to the see of Aberdeen, to which he was consecrated on Easter-day anno 1664. He was a man of great worth, and died much esteemed on the 16th February 1682, in the 73d year of his age. [See this prelate's character in the Preface to Bishop Bed^s Life.] 134 THE SEE OF ABERDEEN. 9. GEORGE HALIBURTON, descended of a collateral branch of the family of Pitcur, was first minister at Coupar in Angus, then was promoted to the see of Brechin, and from thence translated to that of Aberdeen anno 1682, where he sat till the Revolution anno 1688, and died at his house of Denhead, in the parish of Coupar in Angus, September 29. 1715, aged 77 years. THE SEE OF MORAY. IT is said, this Episcopal See was founded by King Mal- colm III. surnamed Kenmoir. GREGORY, 11 .] Gregory, bishop of this see, is men- tioned in the reign of King Alexander I. as witness in a charter to the priory of Scone ; and in the time of King David I. he is also named as witness to his charter to the abbey of Dunfermline, [Cart. Dunferm. Dalr. Coll. p. 240 and 388-9, and Pref. p. 56.] I suspect the first bishop of Dunkeld, and this one here, may be the same person. WILLIAM, 11 .] William was bishop here in the time of King David I. [Cart. CambusJc. it. Writs ofClacJcm.] He is bishop also under King Malcolm IV. [Cart. Dun- ferm. it. Cart. Kelso et Dipl.] and in the time of Pope Adrian IV. [Hist. Lib. p. 353.] This bishop, together with one Nicolaus, secretary to King Malcolm IV. went to Rome for to complain of the usurpation of the archbishop of York over the Church of Scotland. The bishop return- ed as legate from the Pope in Scotland, [Chr. S. Cruc. Edinb.] He died 9 no Kal Feb. anno 1162, [Ibid.] and had consecrated Arnold bishop of St. Andrews two years before. FELIX, 11 .] Felix, bishop of this see, is witness in a charter by King William, [Dalr. Pref. p. 56.] which, as that learned gentleman observes, must have been sometime betwixt the years 1162 and 1171. For, 136 THE SEE OF MORAY. SIMEOX DE TOXEI became bishop here in the year 1171, [Chr. Melr.] This Simeon was a monk of Melrose ; and before that had been abbot at Cogshall in the county of Essex in England, of which kingdom he has probably been a native, as there were some of that surname who came over with the conqueror. Simeon is bishop of this see, and contemporary with Simeon, Matthew, Andrew, and Gregory, bishops of Dunblane, Aberdeen, Caithness, and Ross, in the time of King William, [Cart. Mor.] and this same Simeon, bishop of this see, is a co-witness with Robert de Quincy and Philip de Valoniis, [Ibid.] He died anno 1184, [Chr. Melros.] and was buried in the church of Birney, then the cathedral of the diocese, about a mile south-west of Elgin.* RICHARD, 1187.] Richard, one of King William's de- rici, was elected next bishop of this see, and was con- secrated the Ides of March anno 1187, at St Andrews, by Hugo bishop there, [Cart. Mel. et Mor.] Richard was bishop here in the time of King William, [Cart. Glasg. it. Dipl. et Numism. it. Officers of State., p. 468.] He was contemporary with Joceline, Hugo, Turpin, Andrew, bishops of Glasgow, Dunk eld, Brechin, and Caithness, [Cart. Aberd.] and with Matthew bishop of Aberdeen, and also in the time of William elect of Glasgow, chancellor to the king, and of John elect of Aberdeen, [Cart. Mor.] He is witness to King William's confirmation of a donation to the abbey of Kinloss, and a co-witness is H. Cancellarius. The paper which I have viewed wants indeed the date of the year ; but yet it must have been betwixt the years 1189 and 1199, as being the space of time in which Hugo, who in the last year of his life came to be bishop of Glasgow, filled the chancellor's office, [v. Officers of State.] Whilst * Ainslie makes it five miles, and Shaw, in his History of Moray, places it two milei (three statute mile) south of Elgin. THE SEE OF MOBAY. 137 this prelate was bishop of Moray, the king was very bene- ficent to this see. He gave orders for the punctual payment of the revenues bestowed by his royal ancestors upon the bishops of Moray ; and, besides, he made over a portion of land, commonly called a toft, in the towns of Kintore, Banff, Cullen, Elgin, Nairn, and Inverness ; as also the teinds of all the king's rents, ordinary and extraordinary, within the diocese of Moray, which had not formerly been set apart for the church there. He was bishop here in the year 1201, [Cart. Kels.] He died anno 1203 at Spynie, where he was buried, [Cart. Melr.~\ " Ricardus elect. Moravien." is a wit- ness to King William. BRICE, 1203.] Brice or Bricius, a son of the noble fa- mily of Douglas, prior of Lesmahagow, which is a cell in Clydesdale that belonged to the abbey of Kelso. This bishop^s mother was sister to Friskinus de Kerdal of Ker- dal, on the river Spey, as appears by a charter of the church of Deveth, granted by Bishop Bricius for supporting the fabric of the church of Spey, at that time the cathedral of his bishopric. " Ad instantiam et petitionem," says he, " Friskini de Kerdal, avunculi nostri," [Chart. Morav. f. 22. v.] I suspect he may have been the same person who I see is dean of this see of Moray in the time of the preceding Richard. It is said, he became bishop here in the year 1203, and that he died anno 1222. [Cart.Melr.] This bishop was the first who, by application to the Pope Innocent III. got the cathedral of this see to be fixed in the place of Spy- nie. He founded the college of canons, being eight in number, [Cart. Morav.~\ It is said he went to Rome to a council in the year 1215,* [Cart Melr.~\ He had no * His journey to Rome is confirmed by a safe-conduct from the King of England, granted in order to facilitate his return from the Papal Court. (Rot. Scot. 17 Johan. m. 8.) 138 THE SEE OF MORAY. less than four brothers, viz. Henry, Alexander, Archibald, and Hugo de Douglas. [Cart. Mor.] He was bishop on the 15th October 1221, [Ibid.] He died anno 1222, and was buried at Spynie. [Mr King's MS.] ANDREW DE MORAVIA, 122-.] Andrew de Moravia, or Moray, a son of the family of Duffus, (the best of that noted surname,) was the following bishop ; and though there be no particular time allotted for his entrance, yet it must very probably have been very soon after the death of the former bishop, since we see a writ by Pope Honorius, on the twelfth day of May, in the seventh year of his papacy, directed to " electo Moray." [Cart Mor.] and indeed there is certain instruc- tion of his being actual bishop here in the year 1224, [/fo'd.] item, in the years 1226, 1232, 1233, 1234, 1236, 1237, 1238, 1239, 1240, 1241, 1242, [Ibid et Reg. Chart. Dipl. it. Cart. Aberbr. Cambusk. et Balmer.] He was bishop here in the 22d year of King Alexander, [Cart. Arb.] He died anno 1242, [Cart. Melr.] This great and worthy prelate having obtained from King Alexander II. a beau- tiful piece of ground, lying at the east-end of the town of Elgin, close upon the margin of the river which glides by the north side of that city, he laid the foundation of that magnificent and noble church, which was dedicated to the Holy Trinity, and ordained to be the cathedral church of Moray for ever. The solemnity was performed upon the 15th day of July, in the year 1224, by the bishop of Caith- ness and dean of Ross, by authority of Pope Honorius III. To the eight canons established by Bishop Bricius Douglas, Andrew Moray added fourteen more ; and having, with great prudence and piety, exercised his Episcopal function twenty years, he died anno 1242, and his remains were de- posited in the south-side of the quire of the cathedral which he himself had founded, under a large stone of blue marble, [Mr King's MS.] which is still to be seen. THE SEE OF MORAY. 139 SIMON, 1242.] Simon whom we observe to have been dean of this see in the years 1232 and 1242, [Cart. Morav.~\ was advanced to be bishop thereof. He is said to have died anno 1251 ; yet I think there is an initial letter or character, which I take to be S, denoting most plainly that person to have been bishop in the year 1253, [Cart. 3/or.] But what I cannot account for is, that Simon, written at full length, is found bishop here in the year 1348, [Cart. Mor.~\ unless it be supposed a mistake in the writer for 1248. He was bishop of Moray nine years, died anno 1253, and was buried in the quire of the cathedral. [Mr King's AfS.]* ARCHIBALD, 1253.] Archibald, dean of this church, was consecrated bishop thereof in the year 1253, and he was bi- shop here in the years 1256, 1258, 1260, 1268, 1269, and 1 287, [Cartul. Morav.~\ A. was bishop here in the 19th year of King Alexander, [Cart. Newb. et Cart. Aberbr.] and Alexander (written at full length,) was bishop of Moray in the 22d year of King Alexander, [Cart. Paslet.]but here it would would seem there is an error of the name Alexander, writ- ten for Archibald. Archibald was bishop here anno 1290, [Rymer.] He built the palace of Kinedder, where he mostly resided. During his episcopate, William earl of Ross having somehow committed an outrage in the church of Petty, which belonged to one of the canons of the cathe- dral of Moray, as an atonement for his crime he gave to the church of Moray the lands of Catboll and other lands lying in the shire of Ross. He died 5to Idus Decemb. 1298, [Cart. Morav.~\ and was buried in the quire of the cathedral. * According to Matthew Paris, (p. 836,) Simon was succeeded in the see of Moray by Radulph, a canon of Lincoln ; but it does not appear that the latter was ever consecrated. The words of the historian are as follows : " Electus'est in Episcopum Morafensem. in Scotia, M. Radulphus ecclesiae " Lincolencnsis canonicui." THE SEE OF MORAY. DAVID M OKAY, 1299.] David Moray, a son of the fa- mily of in the shire of was conse- crated bishop of this see at Avignon, in the time of Pope Boniface VIII. on the vigil of the holy apostles Peter and Paul, in the year 1299- He was bishop here before the year 1309, [Andersons Independ. App. No. 14.] and anno 1309, [Cart. Morav.~\ He was bishop anno 1311 and 1313, [Cart. Aberbr.] He was bishop anno Rob. I. 7 mo [Cart. Scon. Aberb. and Hay^\ anno 1330, [Hay.] But I suppose it ought to be no more than 1320, by the date of his successor's consecration. This prelate was the first who founded the Scots college at Paris in the year 1325, which foundation was confirmed by Charles le Bel, king of France, in the month of August 1326. But the bishop died 20th of January the same year, before the college was fully esta- blished, and was buried in the quire of the cathedral.* JOHN PILMORE, 1325.] John Pilmore, erroneously cal- led John Eglemore, by a mistake of the transcribers of Fordun, was son to Adam Pilmore, burgess of Dundee, as appears by an indenture, dated " in festo Sancti Valen- tini martyris, 1326," to which " Adam de Pilmore burgensis de Dundee"" appends his seal, " una cum sigillo venerabilis " in Christo patris Joannis Dei gratia, episcopi Moraviensis, " filii ejusdem Adae de Pilmore," [Ex Chartis Walterl Macfarlane de eodem.] Elect for the see of Ross was consecrated bishop of Moray 3^ Kal. April anno Domini 1325, by the hands of Pope John XXII. and by the Pope's own provision, [Car. Mor.~\ This bishop took great care to finish \diat his predecessor had begun in Paris, as ap- pears from an authentic document in the year 1333, [Pre- * In Fadera, Vol. II. p. 1043, the bishop of Moray is charged by Edward I. of England with assenting to the death of John Cumin. Being therefore excommunicated, he fled to Orkney, whereupon Edward wrote to Haken, King of Norway, requesting him to order the bishop to be seized and sent to him. 6th March 1306-7. THE SEE OF MORAY. 141 face to Dr Mackenzie's Qd Vol.] This establishment sub- sisted in the university of Paris, by the name of Grisy, until the time of the Reformation, and was always admin- istered by the authority of the bishops of Moray, who, in quality of founders and patrons, presented to the house and settled directors and superiors thereof. See Bishop Robert Schaw. He was bishop here in the years 1331, 1334, 1343, 1351, 1360, and 1361, [Cart. Morav.] He was bishop of Moray thirty-seven years, [ Mr King's MS.] This prelate died in the castle of Spynie, on the vigil of St Michael the Archangel, A. D. 1362, [Cart. Morav.] and yet we find Simon bishop of Moray in the year 1348, [Cart. Mor.fol. 78 ;] which can noways be reconciled with the long episcopate of John Pilmore, unless by supposing, as above, that the third figure is placed instead of the second, or more properly III. for II. ALEXANDER BAR, 1362.] Alexander Bar, " decretorum " doctor et licentiatus in legibus," was consecrated bishop of this see, at Avignon, on the Saturday before Christmas, anno 1362, by Pope Urban V. He was bishop in the years 1362, 3, 4, 5, 9, the 1st and 10th years of King Robert II. 1383, 6, 9, and 1396, [Cart. Morav.] A. is witness to se- veral charters in the 19th year of King Robert II. Alex- ander was bishop here anno 3^ Robert II. " in pleno Par- " liamento nostro apud Sconam, die tertio Aprilis," [Mar et Cart. Aberd. it. Ruddiman against Logan, p. 400.] This excellent prelate was sadly harrassed by Alexander earl of Buchan, youngest son of King Robert II. by Elizabeth Mure. In the month of June 1390, on the feast of St Bo- tulph, he did not only burn the cathedral church, but also the whole town of Elgin, St Gileses church, an hospital which is called " Domus Dei de Elgin," and eighteen manses of the canons and chaplains. For this, and other impieties, he was deservedly called " The Wolf of Badenoch." He was excommunicated with the highest solemnities, from 142 THE SEE OF MORAY. which he was afterwards, upon his repentance, absolved by Walter Trail, bishop of St Andrews, in the church of the Blackfriars at Perth, being first received at the door of the church, and then before the altar, in presence of the king and many of the nobility ; the earl at the same time being obliged to make what satisfaction he could to the see of Moray, and to obtain forgiveness from the Pope. He died the 15th of May 1397, [Cart. Mor.] and was buried in the quire of the cathedral. WILLIAM SPYNIE, 1397.] William Spynie, chantor of Moray, and " decretorum doctor," was consecrated bishop hereby Pope Benedict XIII. on the 16th September, the third year of his pontificate, i. e. anno Dom. 1397, [Cart. Morav.] In the year 1398, this bishop names his predeces- sors, Archibald, David, John, and Alexander, [C. Morav.] He died in the canonry of Elgin the 2d day of August 1406, [C. Morav.] and was buried in thequire with his predecessors. JOHN IXNES, 1407.] John Innes, parson of Duffus, and batchelor of laws, was consecrated the 23d January anno 1 406-7, by Pope Benedict XI II. [C. Mor.] He was bishop here anno 1408, [Reg. CJtart.] and died the 25th April 1414, [C. Morav.] and was buried at the foot of the north-west pillar which supported the great tower or third steeple now fallen. After the death of this prelate, on the 18th of May following the chapter met, in order to elect a bishop ; but before they proceeded to the election, they all solemnly swore, that whosoever of then" number should happen to be chosen bishop of Moray should set apart one-third of the revenues of the see for repairing the cathedral, which had been greatly demolished in the time of Bishop Alexander Bar. HEXRY LEIGHTOX, 1414.] Henry Leighton, or Leich- ton, parson of Duffus, and chantor of Moray, " Legum " doctor, et Baccalaureus in decretis," a son of the ancient THE SEE OF MORAY. 143 family of the Leichtons of Ulys-haven, or Usen, in vicecom. de Forfar. He was bishop of Moray ten years, [Mr King's MS.} was consecrated bishop of this see, " in civi- tf tate Valencia Terraconen, Provinciae," on the 8th March 1414-5, and was bishop here anno 142], [C. Mor.] anno 1423, [Inv. Aberd.} anno 1424, [Reg. Chart.} In the year 1424, or 1425, he was translated to the see of Aberdeen. Vide See of Aberdeen. DAVID, 142.] David was bishop of Moray anno 1429- [Reg. Chart.] COLUMBA DUNBAB,, 1429-] Columba Dunbar, descend- ed of the Earls of Murray, was dean of the church of Dun- bar. He is designed, " Decanus ecclesiae collegiatae de O * O " Dunbar, penultimo Februarii 1411," [Regist Cart.} and then promoted to this see. Columba was bishop here in the year 1429, \C. Dumferl.] but as the date bears to have been on the 17th of January, this will bring it to be 1430, and thereby the date of the foregoing bishop may quadrate well enough. There is a safe-conduct to this bishop from the king of England, to pass through his dominions in his way to Rome, in the year 1433, with 30 servants in his re- tinue ; as also another, dated May 10. 1434, to go through England to the council of Basil, [Rymer, Tom. X. p. 584.] Upon his return home he died in his castle of Spynie, armo 1435, and was buried in the aisle of St Thomas the Martyr, (i. e. Thomas Becket.) [Spotiswood MS.] JOHN WINCHESTER, 1437. John Winchester, an En- glishman, who came into Scotland in the retinue of King James I. batchelor of the canon law, anno 1425. His first station in our church, besides being chaplain to the king, was a prebendary of Dunkeld ; and he came afterwards to be provost of Lincluden, and lord-register, [Reg. et Charta penes dommum Gray.] In King James I. "s charter of con- 144 THE SEE OF MORAY. firmation of the monastery of Aberbrothock, Jan. 1. 1436-7, he is " electo et confirmat. Episcopo Moravien." He was consecrated " in Festo Sanctae Crucis," within the monas- tery of Cambuskenneth, in the year 1437. John was bishop of this see anno 1439, [Peerage, p. 278,] and anno 1440, 49, 51, 52, 57, 59, [Reg. Chart.] 1449, [C. Glasg.] 1445 and 1451, [C. Mor] 1451, [C. Dumfer] 1452, [Fordun ;] and John was bishop here anno 1452 and 1453, et reg. 18. [Inv. Aberd] This prelate was employed in divers em- bassies into England, during the minority of King James II. [Rymer ;] and accordingly we see the following writ of that king in the cartulary of his see : " Sciatis nos, et " propter grata obsequia quondam genitori nostro recolen- " dae memoriae, per Reverend, in Christo Patrem Johan- " nem Episcopum Moravien. consiliarium nostrum dilec- " turn temporibus suis multipliciter impensa, et per eundem " nobis fideHter continuata, et ad ejus preces et instantiam " ipsi Episcopo fecisse et infeodasse villam de Spynie, li- " berum burgum in baronia, 1 " 1451, and again 1452. He died anno Dom. 1458, and was buriedin St Mary's aisle with- in the cathedral. [Spotiswood MS.] JAMES STEWART, 1459.] James Stewart, a branch of the illustrious family of Lorn, was first dean of this see, [Chart. Publ] He came afterwards to be lord-treasurer, anno 1453, \_Regist. Chart.] and upon the death of Bishop Winchester in the year 1458-9, he was advanced to this bishopric. He was bishop here anno 1460, [Cart. Mor.] but he lived only two years, and was buried in St Peter's and St Paul's aisle on the north side of the cathedral. [Spot- tlswood MS.] DAVID STEWART, 1462.] David Stewart, brother to the former bishop, and parson of Spynie, was in this see in the year 1463, 1 [Cart. Dmnferm.] 1464, 1 According to Mr King's MS. he was bishop of Moray ltd. 2 THE SEE OF MORAY. 145 [C. Morav.} and anno 1468 and 1470, [Regist. Chart.} He built the great tower of Spynie castle, a mighty strong house : it is called to this day David's tower. He was much disquieted by Alexander earl of Huntly, who withheld the feu-duties of such lands as held of the see of Moray within the lordship and bounds of Strath- bogie. The earl, for his obstinacy and sacrilege, was ex- communicated ; but at last, by the mediation and good offi- ces of the abbot of Kinloss, the prior of Pluscarden, and se- veral others, matters were made up, and the earl absolved, after satisfaction and submission made. This good prelate made several wise regulations ; and after he had governed the see of Moray fourteen years he died, and was buried in the same aisle with his brother, [Mr King's MS.} He was buried in St Peter and St Paul's aisle, on the north of the cathedral church. [Spottiswood MS,} WILLIAM TULLOCH, 1477.] William T-illoch, for- merly bishop of the see of Orkney, and keeper of the pri- vy-seal, was translated to the see of Moray in the year 1477 ; for in the Parliament, anno 1476, which restored the Earl of Ross, he was still bishop of Orkney and Privy- seal : But in a charter anno 1477, he is become bishop of Moray and keeper of the privy-seal. He was bishop here and Privy-seal anno 1478, and 27th July 1479, \Aberbr.'} He was bishop here anno 1478-79-81, and Privy-seal, [Reglst. Chart} He was buried in St Mary's aisle, in the canonry church of Moray, and must have died at least in the year 1482. For, ANDREW STEWART, third son of Sir James Stewart, sur- named the Black Knight of Lorn, by Jane queen-dowager of Scotland, the widow of King James I. succeeded him in 1482. In the year 1456, this gentleman was subdean of Glasgow, and rector of Monkland, [Writs of the College ofGlasg.} Anno 1477, he is provost of Lincluden, and re- 146 THE SEE OF MORAY. tained his subdeanry in commendam ; and the same year he was elected dean of faculty in the university of Glasgow, [Ibidem.] He was elect of Moray, and Lord Privy-seal in the month of July 1482 ; and " Electus, confirmatus, Mo- " ravien." is in the rolls of Parliament, December 2. 1482, in which year the king calls him " dilecto avunculo nostro " Andrea, electo Moravien. secreti sigilli custode," [R. Chart.] But the privy-seal he resigned upon his conse- cration in the year 1483. Andrew, elect of Moray, is wit- ness in a charter to Alexander duke of Albany, lord lieu- tenant-general of the kingdom, and high admiral. The paper wants a date, but one of the co-witnesses is John bi- shop of Glasgow, who died in January 1482-3 ; and James bishop of Dunkeld, another witness, died anno 1483. He is bishop here anno 1487, [Ibid.] In the year 1488, there is a confirmation by king James III., and a new enlarge- ment of the burgh of Spynie, in which are these kind ex- pressions, viz. " Et pro speciali fiducia, cordialique dilec- " tione, et singulari favore, quos gerimus erga Reverendum ** in Christo Patrem, nostrumque avunculum, Andream " nunc Episcopum Moravien. et pro suis fideli et gratuito " servitio, auxilio et consilio, nobis retroactis temporibus " multipliciter impensis et exhibitis." Apud Aberdene, 16th April 1488, [C. Morav.] which was only two months before the slaughter of the king. He was bishop here anno 1492, [C. Morav. C. Aberbr. Assed. Aberbr. it. Hay;~\ anno 1492, and 94, [Reg. Cart.] anno 1496, [C. Cambusk] " Andreas Episcopus Moravien. frater-germanus Jacobi " comitis de Buchan,"' anno 1501, [Reg: Chart.] And in that year, 1501, he died, [Ibid.] and was buried in the quire of the cathedral. ANDREW FOREMAN, 1501.] Andrew Foreman, a son of the laird of Huttoun in Berwickshire, was Proto-notary apostolick in Scotland anno 1499, [Reg. Char.] He was postulate of Moray in the year 1501, at which time he gets THE SEE OF MORAY. 147 a commission, together with Robert archbishop of Glasgow, and Patrick earl of Bothwell, to treat about a marriage betwixt King James IV. and Margaret, eldest daughter of Henry VII. king of England ; and he himself gets a sub- sequent commission, to treat of a peace betwixt the two nations, \Jtcg. Chart.] In the same year, 1501, he was fully promoted to this see ; and, together with it, held in commendam the priories of Pittenweem in Scotland and of Cottingham in England. Andrew is bishop of Moray July 10. 1502, the 5th indiction, and 10th of Pope Alex- ander VII. [Mar et Clackmannan.] He is " episcopus " Moravien. et commendatarius de Pittenweem in Scotia, " et Cottingham in Anglia," anno 1503-4, itepi 1506, [Reg.- Chart.] January 2. 1506, 9th indiction, and 3d of Pope Julius II. King James IV. appoints him his ambas- sador to England, in order to procure a personal conference betwixt him and Henry then king of England, therein ex- pressly designed " Frater et consanguineus noster amantis- " simus," as appears by the commission given him, dated at Edinburgh, " 19th Julii, anno regni nostri 22." [i. e. 1510, Macfarl.] This commission is recorded by Rymer, Tom. X. p. 376, but erroneously put under the year 1427, and so ascribed to the times of James I. and Henry VI. He is designed Andrew bishop of Moray, commendator of Pit- tenweem, and Cottingham in England, [Clack] He was bishop anno 1512, [Cart. Mor] and bears the title of " An- " dreas, miseratione divina, Moravien. episcopus, commen- " datarius perpet. monasteriorum de Dryburgh et Pittin- " veme, et Cottingham in Anglia, Sti Andreae et Ebora- " cen. Diocesium." And he is stiled bishop of Moray, and commendator of Dryburgh and Pittenweem, in a treaty of confederation made at Edinburgh, 10th July 1512. In the year 1514, he was translated to the archiepiscopal see of St Andrews, where see more concerning him.* * In Young's Account of the marriage of James the Fourth with Margaret of England, we find that the bishop of Moray was employed by his sovereign K 2 148 THE SEE OF MORAY. JAMES HEPBURN, 1516.] James Hepburn, third son of Adam Lord Hales, and brother to Patrick the first earl of Bothwell, had been rector of Partoun, and in the year 1515 abbot of Dunfermline, [State Letters ,-] and on the 15th June, the same year, had been constituted lord-trea- surer. Anno 1516 he became bishop of Moray, and on the 3d October, the same year, he quitted the treasury : He is designed " Rector de Partoun, nunc Moravien. ecclesiae postulatus," [Reg. Chart.] and anno 1516 and 17, he is bishop of Moray, [Ibid.] He was bishop here anno 1520, [Cart. Mor. et Aberbr] He was bishop anno 1521, [Cart. Cambusk.] and he was bishop here anno 1524, [Cart. Morav.] in which year he died, and was buried in our La- dy's aisle, near to the Earl of Huntly's tomb. [Mr King's ROBERT SCHAW, 1524.] Robert Schaw, a son of the laird of Sauchie in the shire of Stirling, Vas elected abbot of Paisley, upon the resignation of his own uncle George ; for which he obtained the king's letters-patent the 1st March 1498, [Chart. Pub.] He was advanced to this see of Moray 1524. He is bishop here 5th February 1524-5, [Cartul. Aberbr.] He is in a commission of embassy to England during the time he was bishop, [Rymer] He died in the year 1527, and was buried between the sepulchres of Bishop Alexander Stewart and Andrew Stewart his bro- ther, [Mr King^s MS.] and has the character of a man of great virtue, [Spotiszvood MS.] - 1 shall subjoin here, as being a good piece of history, the foUowing writ from the cartulary of his see : " ROBERTUS, miseratione divina, " Moravien. episcopus, venerabili et egregio viro Magis- " tro Georgio Lokcart, sacrae Theologiae professori, ac " praeposito ecclesiae collegiatae de Crychtoun, Scoto-Pa- as one of the commissioners who, at the court of Henry VII., arranged the royal nuptials. See Leland'i Collectanea, p. 258. THE SEE OF MOKAT. 149 " risiis, salutem, cum benedictione divina. De vestris pru- " dentia, scientia et circumspectione, plurimam in Domino " fiduciam habentes, bursas per quondam recolendae memo- " riae Moravian, episcopum, praedecessorem nostrum Pari- " siis fundatas, de Gresie nuncupatas, ad nostramque et nos- " trae sedis cathedralis Moraviensis Praelati pro tempore, " (potestatem ?) ex primaeva sua fundatione, dispositione, " provisioneetdonatione, plenojurespectan.cumpercessum, " decessum,divisionem,resignationem, seu alias quovismodo " vacare contigerint, scolaribus studentibus, secundum fun- " dationis tenorem, personis qualificatis et Scotis, et praeci- " pue Moravien. dioces. oriundis, providendi, disponen. et " conferen. regen. manutenen. defenden. eorum mores, et *' excessus corrigen. et reforman. et, causantibus demeritis, " deponen. et reprimen. aliosque eorum locis imponen. cae- " teraque omnia alia et singula quae in praemissis nobis ex " fundatione facien. incumbunt, et necessaria fuerint, seu " quomodolibet opportuna agen. geren. et exercen. nostram, " tenore praesentium, commitimus potestatem, et facultatem " in Domino impertimur specialem praesentibus, ad arbi- " trium nostrum duraturis. In cujus rei testimonium, his " nostris commissionis literis, manuali subscriptione nostra " munitis, sigillum nostrum rotundum affigi fecimus, apud " oppidum Edinburgi, die decimo quinto mensis Januarii, " anno Domini millesimo quingentesimo vigesimo sexto, et " nostrae consecrationis anno secundo." ALEXANDER STEWART, 1527.] Alexander Stewart, son of Alexander duke of Albany, son to King James II. by Ka- tharine Sinclair, then his wife, daughter of William earl of Orkney and Caithness, was the next bishop. Their marriage having by act of Parliament been declared unlawful, long after they were both dead, this gentleman was declared illegitimate in the year 1516 ; whereupon he betook himself to the ser- vice of the church, and had first the priory of Whitern bes- towed upon him, afterwards the abbey of Inchaffray ; and 150 THE SEE OF MORAY. then the government of the abbey of Scone was given him by his brother John duke of Albany, now become regent of the kingdom ; and, last of all, he was made bishop of Mo- ray, anno 1527. He is bishop here anno 1530, [Cartul. jfberbr.] and anno 1532, {Reg. Chart, et Cart. Morav.~\ He died bishop here, it is said, anno 1534. Certain it is, that, in the year 1538, he is stiled " quondam Alexandro epis- " copo Moravien." [Reg. Chart. B. 22. No. 115.] He was buried in the monastery of Scone. [Mr King's MS.~\ PATRICK HEPBURN, 1535.] Patrick Hepburn 2 , son to Patrick, first Earl of Bothwell, being educated by his un- cle John, prior of St Andrews, came to be his successor in that priory anno 1522. In the year 1524, he was made secretary, in which office he continued until the 1527. He was advanced to the see of Moray anno 1535, and at the same time he held the abbey of Scone in perpetual com- mendam, [Reg. Cliart. anno 1539-40.] He was bishop an- no 1539, [C. Mor.~\ anno 1446, [Register ofPr. Council,] anno 1561, {Keiths History , A pp. p. 175,] and anno 1568, [Errol.] " Patricius episcopus Morav." subscribes the let- ters, in name of the community of Scotland, for empowering to treat about the marriage of our Queen Mary with Fran- cis dauphin of France. Upon the Reformation he had the fate of the other prelates, but kept possession of his Episco- pal palace till his death, which happened at Spynie castle the 20th of June 1573, [Mr King's MS.] and was buried in the quire of the cathedral church. In the cartulary of this see are to be seen a great many tacks of the lands per- taining to this bishopric, leased out by him at and after the year 1540, from a foresight, no doubt, of what was com- ing on ; and in all the assedations he had the additional title of " Monasterii de Scona commendatarius perpetuus." 2 He found the bishopric ill good condition, but he feued out all the lands belonging to it. THE SEE OF MORAY. 151 REFORMATION. 1. GEORGE DOUGLAS, 1573.] George Douglas, natural son of Archibald earl of Angus, was, upon the death of Pa- trick Hepburn, made bishop of Moray, as appears by three several papers in the Register of Benefices, &c. The first is intituled, " Licence to cheis a Bishop of Moray, 12th Au- " gust 1573 ;" the second, " Consecration of the Bishop of " Moray, 5th February 1573-4 ;" the third, " Restitution " of the Bishop of Moray to his temporalitie thairof," dated 23d March 1573-4 ; and it is observable that, in this regis- ter, he has no other designation but son-natural to um- quhile Archibald earl of Angus, and Reverend Father George, bishop of Moray, 27th October 1574, [Ibid.] There is a writ annexed to the old cartulary of Moray, which is signed by " Georgius Moravien. Episcopus,"at least by a notary-public in his name, in the year 1587 ; and the writ begins with these words, " Georgius miseratione," (but wants divina,) " Moravien. Episcopus" ; and there is likeways a tack or assedation, (i. e. lease of land,) which be- gins, " George, be the mercy of GOD, bishop of Moray, with " consent and assent of the chanons of our chapter, 1 ' anno 1580. He was bishop of Moray 16 years, [Ibid Cart. Mo- rav.] He was buried in the church of Holyroodhouse, [Mr King's MS.] After the death of George Douglas, the bi- shopric of Moray was by King James the VI. erected in- to a temporal lordship, and given to Mr Alexander Lind- say, brother-german to David earl of Crawford, under the title and designation of Lord Spynie, which he enjoyed un- til the year 1606 ; when his Majesty King James VI. got a resignation of it by payment of a considerable sum of mo- ney, and restored it to the church, [Mr King's MS.] Father Hay says, that this Lord Spynie was killed by 153 THE SEE OF MORAY. David Lindsay of Edzel, 1607, by mistake, instead of the Earl of Crawford. 2. ALEXANDER DOUGLAS, 1606.] Alexander Douglas, who was minister at Elgin about 17 years, was promoted to the see of Moray anno 1606. He died at Elgin in May 1623, and was buried in the south aisle of the church of St Giles, in a vault built by his widow ; who likewise erected a stately monument over him, which is to be seen quite en- tire to this day. S.JOHN GUTHKIE, 1623.] John Guthrie, who had been minister at Perth first, and carried to Edinburgh in 1620, upon the death of the fonner bishop, was promoted to this see. He was bishop here 20th of November 1623, [Cart. Morav.] where he continued until he was deprived with the other prelates by the Glasgow Assembly 1638. He lived at Spynie castle till the year 1640, when he was forced to surrender it to Colonel Monroe \, after which he retired to his own estate of Guthrie in the county of Angus. He was a venerable, worthy, and hospitable prelate. After his de- privation by the Assembly at Glasgow, he was, by an act of that Assembly, appointed to make his public repentance in Edinburgh, where, in the year 1633, he had preached in a surplice before his Majesty King Charles I. in the High church, to the great scandal of the zealous people there ; and if he refused to submit he was to be excommunicated, [Mr Ruddiman's MS. of StarlocVs Hist. p. 104 ;] which (upon his despising these orders) was accordingly done. He died during the course of the grand rebellion. 4. MURDOCH MACKENZIE, 1662.] Murdoch Mackenzie, descended from a younger son of the laird of Garloch, the first branch of the family of Seaforth, was born in the year 1600, received Episcopal ordination from Bishop Maxwell of Ross, and went chaplain to a regiment under Gustavus Adol- THE SEE OF MORAY. 153 phus. After his return home from Germany, he became parson of Conton, next of Inverness, afterwards of Elgin ; was made bishop of this see the 18th of January 1662, translated to that of Orkney 14th February 1677 or 1678, and died at Kirkwall in the month of February or March 1688. 5. JAMES AITKINS, 1677.] James Aitkins, or Aiken, Etkins, or Atkins, son of Henry Aiken, sheriff and commis- sary of Orkney, was born in Kirkwall, and had his educa- tion at Edinburgh, from whence he went and studied at Oxford. Returning to Scotland, he became chaplain to the Marquis of Hamilton while he was his Majesty's commis- sioner to the Assembly in 1638 ; in which station he be- haved so well that, upon the marquis's return to England, he procured from the king a presentation for Mr Aiken to the church of Birsa in Orkney, in which office he procured a general esteem from all persons. In the beginning of the year 1650, when the Marquis of Montrose landed in that country, Mr Aitkins was unanimously named by the bre- thren to draw up a declaration in their and his own name, and which, by their consent and approbation, was pub- lished ; containing very great expressions of loyalty, and a constant resolution firmly to adhere to their dutiful alle- giance. For this step, the whole presbytery being deposed by the General Assembly, Mr Aitkins was excommunicat- ed for having conversed with the Marquis of Montrose, and the council did issue out an order for apprehending him. But, by private notice from his kinsman, Sir Archibald Primrose, afterwards lord-register, at that time clerk to the council, he fled into Holland, where he skulked till the year 1653 ; when, returning into his native country, he transported his family from Orkney to Edinburgh, and re- sided there obscurely until the Restoration, and then he went to London in company with Bishop Sydeserf, (the only Mirviving prelate in Scotland,) to congratulate the King's 154 THE SEE OF MORAY. Majesty ; at which time the bishop of Winchester presented him to the rectory of Winfrith in Dorsetshire : there he continued till the year 1677. He was elected and conse- crated bishop of Moray ; but he was translated from this in the year 1680 to the see of Galloway. [Athence Oxanien.'] 6. COLIN FALCONER, 1680.] Colin Falconer was the only son of William Falconer of Dunduff and Beatrix Dunbar, his spouse, a daughter of Dunbar of Bogs in the county of Moray. William, this prelate's father, was fourth son of Alexander Falconer of Halkertoun and Elisabeth, daugh- ter of Sir Archibald Douglas of Glenbervy. Colin Fal- coner was born in the year 1623 ; he studied the liberal arts in St Leonard's college in the university of St An- drews, and was married the 24th of July 1648. Some years thereafter he became a clergyman : His first settle- ment was in the parish of Essil in the diocese of Moray ; from thence he was in a few years removed to Forres, where he continued to the time of his promotion to the bi- shopric of Argyle, on the 5th day of September 1679, from whence he was the next year translated to the see of Moray. The king's letter, directed to the dean and chap- ter of the cathedral church of Moray, for his election, bears date at Whitehall the 7th day of February 1679-80. He was an hospitable, pious, and peaceable prelate, being re- markably happy in reconciling differences, and in removing discords and animosities amongst the gentlemen of his dio- cese. He died at Spynie castle, November 11. 1686, in the 63d year of his age. His remains are deposited in the south aisle of St Giles's church in Elgin, at the bottom of the tower or steeple, towards the east. 7. ALEXANDER ROSE, 1687.] Alexander Rose, descend- ed from the family of Kilravock. His father was prior of Monimusk in the shire of Aberdeen. He commenced master of arts at Aberdeen, but studied divinity at Glasgow under THE SEE OF MORAY. 155 Dr Gilbert Burnet, afterwards bishop of Salisbury in Eng- land. He was minister at Perth, and then professor of di- vinity at Glasgow ; and on the 22d October 1686 he got a royal presentation to be principal of St Mary's college in St Andrews ; and on the 17th December 1686 he was re- commended by the king to be chosen into the see of Mo- ray, [Secretary's Books,] and the royal mandate for his con- secration bears date the 8th of March following ; and in little more than half a year, or so, he was translated to the see of Edinburgh, before that he had taken personal pos- session of this see of Moray. [Ibid.] 8. WILLIAM HAY, 1688.] William Hay, said to be of the family of Park, was born the 17th of February 1647. He had his education at Aberdeen, and received holy orders from Bishop Scougal. He was first settled minister at Kil- conquhar (commonly Kinneuchar) in Fife, and was made doctor of divinity by Archbishop Sharp. From Kinneuchar he was removed to the town of Perth, and was afterwards consecrated bishop of Moray anno 1688. The royal war- rant for his consecration bears date the 4th February 1688, [Secretary's Books, Mar] He suffered the common fate of his Order at the Revolution, and died at Castlehill, his son-in-law's house, near Inverness, on the 17th of March 1707.* * For some additional notices regarding this see, the reader is requested to consult the Appendix, Note K. 156 THE SEE OF BRECHIN. THERE was formerly an abbey or convent of Culdees in this place, and Leod, abbot thereof, was witness to a grant by King David to his new abbey of Dunfermline, \C. Dun- ferl] and the same king, about the year 1150, in the end of his days, founded here, and richly endowed, an Episcopal see. T, is the initial letter of the name of the first bishop of Brechin which I have found on record, and that as early as the year 1155 or 6. [Reg. Chart, and Bishop Nicholson's Scottish Historical Library.] SAMPSOX, 116-.] The next bishop we meet within this see is Sampson, in the time of King Malcolm IV. He is a witness to the charters of King Malcolm IV. to the priory of St Andrews, before the year 1158, [Cart. St Andrews.] Sampson is bishop here, and contemporary with Matthew, Andrew, and Simon, bishops of Aberdeen, Caithness, and Moray, \C. Morav.] also with Matthew, Richard, and Andrew, bishops of Aberdeen, Moray, and Caithness, [Ibid.] San. is bishop here in the time of Richard bishop of St Andrews, L. bishop of Dunblane, and Andrew bishop of Caithness, [C. Cambusk.] But whether S. or San. be an abbreviation for Sampson or no, I do not take upon me to determine, though very probably it is so. TURPIN, 1178. Turpin was elect of this see anno 1178, [C. Aberbr] T. also is elect of Brechin in a charter by Hugo bishop of St Andrews, who was but consecrated in the same year 1178, [Ckr. Melr. and Cart. Pr. St. And] and likewise T. is elect of Brechin in a charter by King THE SEE OF BRECHIX. 157 William, [C. Glasg.] Turpin was bishop of Brechin in the reign of the said King William, [C. Aberbr.] and con- temporary with Matthew bishop of Aberdeen and Hugo bishop of St Andrews, [Ibid.] He was bishop in the 5th year of King William, [C. Sc&n.] He was contemporary with Joceline, Hugo, Richard, and Andrew, bishops of Glasgow, Dunkeld, Moray, and Caithness, [Cart Aberd.] Turpin was bishop here under King William, and contem- porary with Joceline and Matthew bishops of Glasgow and Aberdeen, and " Hugo de sigillo, clerico meo," says the king, [Cart. Mor.~\ and in the same cartulary, f. 32, Tur- pin bishop here is co-witness with John, and Matthew, and Richard, bishops of Glasgow, Aberdeen, and Moray, Alex. D. H. W. Robert, Rad. H. Remo, abbots of Dunfermline, Kelso, Arbroath, Holyroodhouse, Scone, Coupar, New- bottle, Kinloss, " comite Dune. Justic. Gilb. com. de " Strathern, Gillebred com. de Angus, R. et Will, ca- " pellanis meis, Hugone de Sigillo meo clerico, W. de Hay, " Galfrido de Maleville, W. de Moreville, apud King- " horn."" But how Turpin should be contemporary with John bishop of Glasgow is very singular, and can no other- wise be accounted for than by supposing John a mistake of the writer, instead of Joceline. This Bishop Turpin gave to the new abbey of Arbroath the churches of Old Montrose and Catterlyn, " pro salute animae suae," [Cart. Aberbr.] He likewise gave grants to the abbey of Coupar. Qii. How could Turpin be only elect anno 1178, and yet bishop in the 5th year of King William, eight years before ? Some error must be here, RADULFUS, 1202.] R. was elect of this see in the time of Gilbert prior of St Andrews, who succeeded to that office in 1196, and died in 1198, [Cart Aberbr.] and Ra- dulfus was consecrated bishop here in the year 1202, [Melr.] R. is bishop here in the time of Pope Innocent III. and is contemporary with R. bishop of Dunkeld, and 158 THE SEE OF BRECHIN. J. bishop of Dunblane, [C. Melr.~\ Rad. was bishop anno 1212, [C. Dunf.] This bishop is witness to King Alex- ander II/'s foundation of the abbey of Balmerino, [C. Balmer.] and likewise is witness to the foundation of the abbey of Lindores, made by David earl of Huntingdon, [Hay.'] He confirmed to the abbey of Coupar the grants of his predecessor Turpin, in which deed William de Bosco, who was chancellor both to King William and his son Alexander II. is a witness. He died anno 1218. [Chr. Melr.] ROBERT MAR, 1219.] Robert Mar is bishop of Brechin in the year 1219, [C. Aberbr. p. 78;] but then, HUGO is bishop here in the reign of King Alexander II. and his contemporaries are Robert elect of Ross, and A. (for Adam I suppose) bishop of Caithness, and William de Bosco chancellor, [C. Aberbr.] Now A. bishop of Caithness died in the year 1222. He is witness to King Alexander II. ; and again " obiit episcopus Bre- " chinen. anno 1218, cui successit Gregorius archidiaconus " ejusdem episcopatus," \_Aug. Hay MS. et Chr. Melr.] This wants to be reconciled with the former bishop. GREGORY, 122-.] Gregory, archdeacon of Brechin, was the next bishop of this see, [Melr.] He was contemporary with William de Bosco the chancellor, and Brice and Ro- bert bishops of Moray and Ross, [C. Aberbr."] He makes mention of Turpin, Rad. and Hugo, his predecessors, [C. Lund.] He was bishop here anno 1225, [C. B aimer.'] He was bishop 19th August 1235 and 1242, [C. Aberbr.] He was bishop sometime after the 32d year of King Alexander II. (i. e. anno 1246,) [Ibid. also vid. Nisb. Herald. App. p. 247.] GILBERT, 124-.] Gilbert was bishop here, and died anno THE SEE OF BRECHIN. 159 1249, to whom Robert his own archdeacon succeeded, [C. Mdr.\ But this will not reconcile with what we find re- corded concerning ALBIN, al. ALWIN, who seems next to have come into this see, where he is bishop 10th October 1248, [C. Aberbr.} and A. is bishop here anno 1243 and 1254, [IbldJ] Albin was bishop anno 1256, [C. Lindor.] and mentions Clement bisjhop of Dunblane his contempo- rary. He would appear to have been bishop here within the reign of King Alexander III. since he is witness to William Brechin of Brechin his foundation of the " Maison de Dieu" in Brechin, for the souls of Wil- liam and Alexander, kings of Scotland. A. is bishop here anno 1260, and is appointed judge in a controversy between Archibald bishop of Moray and some of the canons of that see, [Vid. Cart. Mor. f. 20.] He died anno 1269, [Melr.~\ Richard Hay says, Alwin was bishop of Brechin ad annum 1253, and that he died anno 1267 ; yet Andrew is bishop here anno Domini 1253, [Car. Aberbr.~\ These discrepancies I cannot pretend to adjust, nor can I easily determine in what time to place Edward, who, Archbishop Spotiswood says, was in this see about the 1260 : For, WILLIAM DE KILCONCATH, whom the chronicle of Mel- rose bears to have been " Rector fratrum praedicatorum de Perth, 11 was in the year 1260, according to the same chroni- cle, elected bishop of this see; and Archbishop Spotis- wood calls him dean of Brechin, and says that he died at Rome in the year 1275 ; yet G. is the initial letter of the name of a bishop of this see anno 1270, [C. Arbr.] In all our records we never, or very rarely, see the name William rendered in Latin by Guliehnus : However this may not be altogether certain, and G. may stand for William. 160 THE SEE OF BRECHIN. EDWARD 126-.] Edward (whom I place here merely that I may not omit him altogether) was formerly a monk at Coupar of Angus, and is marked by Archbishop Spotis- wood to have been bishop here about the year 1260 ; and this primate adds, that it is testified of him, that he went on foot through the whole kingdom, with Eustathius abbot of Aberbrothock, preaching the gospel wherever he came. I would not be ready to question this worthy prelate's having read this story somewhere, and it is a pity he doth not point out his vouchers to us ; which neglect can only be attribut- ed to the bad custom of the age he lived in, and of those before him. ROBERT, 1284.] Robert, formerly archdeacon of this see, was bishop thereof in the year 1284. [C. Arbr.} WILLIAM, 1290.] William, bishop of this see, was one of the Scots clergy who, in the year 1290, addressed Ed- ward king of England, that the prince his son might mar- ry Margaret of Norway, heiress of the crown 'of Scotland, [Rymer.] What became of this prelate afterwards there is no instruction that appears as yet, for what I know. JOHN DE KimmnfOKD, 1304.] John de Kynninmond, of an ancient family of that name and designation in the shire of Fife, was bishop here 22d October 1304, [C. ArbrJ\ He is bishop before the year 1309, [Anders. Indep. App. No. 14.] and in the year 1309 he is one of the bishops who solemnly, under their seals, re- cognize King Robert Bruce's title to the crown of Scot- land, [Reg. Chart.} also for 1309 [Vid, Errol] In the year 1311, he appends his seal, together with Nicholas bishop of Dunblane, to a solemn agreement betwixt the ab- bots of Cambuskenneth and Coupar, [C. Cambusk.] He is bishop here in the year 1313 ; also the same person is bishop anno 1321, [R. Ch. et Arbr.} likewise in the 7th THE SEE OF BRECHIN. 161 and 16th years of Robert I. and anno 1323, [Cart. Aberbr.] and he is witness to King Robert's confirmation of the mo- nastery of Aberbrothock, ADAM, 1328.] Adam, according to Spotiswood, was chancellor of the kingdom * sometime in the minority, we may guess, of King David II. ; but as there is no such name to be found in the list of chancellors, it is much to be suspected that the archbishop has been misled somehow or other. Perhaps his Grace may have blended this bishop and Patrick Leuchars together. Adam is bishop of Bre- chin in the year 1308, [Inv . Aberd.] but here must be an error, probably for 1328. He is bishop anno 15. reg. Roberti Bruce, [C. Aberbr.] but here also must be an error of Robert for David, otherwise this cartulary could not be consistent with itself in the dates of this and the former bishop. Adam is bishop here anno 1329, [C. Newb.] Adam was bishop here anno 1338, [Cart Aberd.] He is witness to King David's confirmation of the monastery of Arbroath, anno reg. 13. item anno reg. 15. i. e. anno Domini 1342 and 4, [C. Arbr.] Adam bishop of Brechin is witness to- gether with " David de Barclay, Malcolmo de Ramsay, " vicecomite de Angus, Joanne de Stratton, Waltero de " AUardes," [R. Chart.] Now this David Barclay seems to have been the last laird of Brechin, who was murther- ed in the year 1348, [Buck. Hist.] Bishop Adam was em- ployed in several embassies into England towards the faci- litating of King David's redemption, who had been taken prisoner at the unfortunate battle of Durham, anno 1346.-f - * Could he be Adam of Aberbrothock, who was clerk to Alan bishop of Caithness, when he was chancellor ? Rot. Scot. 27. Jun. 20 Kd. T. f Edward seems to have treated this bishop with more favour than he showed to the other ambassadors ; as a proof of which, we may mention that he bore his expenses when in England. Rot . Scot. 20. Mar. 16 Ed. III. The same prelate appears to Lave been an agent in the daik negcciations L 162 THE SEE OF BRECHIN. He must, at the latest, have died in the beginning of the year 1351. For, PHILIP is in this see anno 1351, [Charter of the lands of Mathers, by William Keith, the marischal, to Barclay of Mathers, in Nisbefs Heraldry, Vol. II. App. p. 248.] PATRICK DE LEUCHARS, 1354.] Patrick de Leuchars, descended of an ancient family in the shire of Fife, had been rector of Tinningham in East Lothian, [Charta penes dominum de Cardross, nunc comitem de Buchan,] was in- vested in the see of Brechin anno 1354, and some time af- ter was made lord high chancellor of the kingdom. He was also much employed in treating about the redemption of King David II. and in adjusting the several payments of his ransom, [Rymer.] He was both bishop and chan- cellor anno reg. 29- h. e. anno Domini 1358, Nov. 12. [Mar.~\ it. Nov. 18. [C. Mor.] also anno reg. 30. {Reg. Chart.] He was bishop and chancellor in the 31st and 34th years of David II. [C. Dunferm.~\ He was chancellor anno 1360, [Panmure;] bishop and chancellor anno 1362, [C. Glasg.] He was bishop anno 28. and 36. David II. and bishop and chancellor July 4. anno reg. 39- [ Mar ; it. C Morav.~\ and bishop anno 40. {Reg. Chart.'] In the year 1370 he resigned his office of chancellor, at least it is certain that he had made this resignation some time before the death of King David, \Eymer.~\ He is bishop in the first, second, and third years of King Robert II. [Reg. Chart. App. 3.] anno reg. 3. [Mar ,] and he was bishop, and pre- sent in Parliament, 1373, [Rud. Ans. to Logan, p. 400 it. Cart. Aberd.~\ STEPHEN, 1384.] Stephen was bishop here in the year 1384. [Spotiswood, et App.~\ of the degenerate David II. with Ed ward III. Sec particularly Rot. Scotiae, 26. JuL 3* Ed. III. THE SEE OF BRECHIN. 163 WALTER FORKESTEB, 1401.] Walter Forrester, of the family of Garden in Stirlingshire, was first a canon of the church of Aberdeen, next was made secretary of state, and then promoted to the see of Brechin, in which he was bi- shop as early as the year 1401. He was bishop here anno 1405 and 1408, [Reg. Chart] and 1408, [Errol] He was bishop anno 1413, \_Dipl. et Numism.] it. anno 8 VO " Roberti Gubern. 1 " [Ibid.] as also 15. Januarii 1415, \Ex autog. penes W. Macf. de eodem.] G. 1424.] Dominus G. is bishop of Brechin in the year 1424, [Reg-. Chart.] but what name this initial letter stands for, I do not pretend to say. JOHN DE CARXOTH, 1435.] John de Carnoth, or rather Crennach, [Fordun,] (which, I suppose, may be the same with Carnotto, now commonly said to be the surname of Charters,) was bishop of this see when he accompanied Princess Margaret, daughter of King James I. into France, in order to be espoused to Lewis XI., then dauphin of that kingdom, anno 1435, [Fordun, Vol. II. p. 485.] John is bishop here anno 1449, [Reg. Chart, it. C. Glasg.~\ John, bishop of this see, was sent into England on an embassy, with divers others, anno 1450, [Foed. Aug.] He is also mentioned April 18. 1451. [Ibid.] * ROBERT, 1456.] Robert was bishop here 1456, Chart.'] but as he is not in any former list of the bishops of this see, I can say no more of him, but that he might have died this year, and his successor been in the see in the course of the same. * In the Chronicle of King James II. there is the following entry relative to this churchman : " August 1456, Died John Crcnuch, bishop of Brecbyne, " an active and virtuous man." 164 THE SEE or BUECHIN. GEORGE SHORSEWOOD, 1454] George Shorsewood, of the family of Bedshiel in the shire of Berwick, {Cliarta penes ComitemdeMarclimont^\ was first rector of Culter anno 1449; and George Shoreswood, rector of Culter, is several times a witness to the king, particularly 1452, [C. Morav.] He was one of the clerici reg-is, and in the year 1453 chancel- lor of the church of Dunkeld. He was confessor to the king anno 1454, the which year he goes on an embassy to England, \Rymer\~\ and 22d of October, in the same year, 1454, he is bishop of this see, [Mar.] He was also royal secretary, and, last of all, became lord high chancellor, [Rymer, etReg. CJiart.] He was bishop here A. D. 1455, [C. Mor.~\ and 1455, et reg. 20. [Inv. Aberd.~] George was bishop here anno 1455, 6, 7, et 8, [R. Cliart.] and bishop and chancellor anno 1455, 6, et 7, [Ibid.'}' He was bishop anno 1456, [Errol.~] In the year 1459 there is mention of " George Shoreswood, quondam episcopo Brechinen." [Reg. CJiart.] and yet he is said to be bishop here as far down as the year 1462, [C. Aberbr.~] He held the office of chancellor till his death. PATRICK GRAHAM, 1463.] Patrick Graham, son to the Lord Graham, and nephew to King James I. by his mo- ther Lady Mary Stewart, daughter to King Robert III. [Peerage,] was bishop of Brechin in the year 1463 and 4, [C. Aberbr.~\ and from this see he was translated in the year 1466 to that of St Andrews. Vid. St Andrews. JOHN BALFOUR, 1470.] John Balfour was bishpp of this see anno 1476, and assisted in the consecration of Bi- shop Livingston of Dunkeld, \HayJ\ He was bishop in the year 1470, [ Aberbr.~\ and John was also bishop in the year 1501, [R. Cliart.} WALTER MELDRUM, 150-.] Walter Meldrum. At what time he came to be bishop, or how long he sat in this THE SEE OF BRECHIN. 165 see, does not as yet appear by any proper voucher that I have chanced to meet with : The chronology, however, ra- ther requires that some person should be in this see be- tween John Balfour and the next bishop. JOHN HEPBURN, 1517.] John Hepburn, descended of the family of Bothwell, was in this see of Brechin in the years 1517, 29, and 32, [Car. Aberbr.] item anno 1524, 28, et 40, [Reg. Char.] and he recognizes the Earl of Arran's right to the regency anno. 1543, [Ep. Reg. Sco. Vol. II. p. 307.] He died in the month of August anno 1558, [Les- laeus de Rebus gestis Scotorum,~] who gives this prelate a very large character. DONALD CAMPBELL, 1558.] Donald Campbell, a son of the family of Argyle, and abbot of Cupar, was elected next bishop of this see : And so Bishop Leslie says, that the abbot of Cupar did succeed Bishop Hepburn in the see of Brechin ; but the election not pleasing the court of Rome, because the abbot had declared himself inclined to the new doctrines, he never assumed the title of bishop, but con- tented himself with that of abbot, in which rank and desig- nation we find him marked in the so named pretended Par- liament 1560. Donald was abbot of Cupar anno 1540 et 1558, [Reg Chart. ,] He died invested of the office of Lord Privy-seal to Queen Mary, in the end of the year 1562. JOHN SINCLAIR, 156-.] John Sinclair, a sdh of the house of Roslin, four miles S. S. E. from Edinburgh, a man well learned in both laws, was dean of Restalrig, (vui- go LesterrickJ) beside Edinburgh, and put into this see by Queen Mary, after the death of Abbot Campbell. He was likewise, for his singular knowledge of the law, first an or- dinary Lord of Session, and then Lord President. He had the honour to join the queen in holy matrimony to the Lord Darnley. He died next year, in the month of April 1566. 166 THE SEE OF BRECHIN. REFORMATION. 1. ALEXANDER CAMPBELL, 1566.] Alexander Campbell, a son of the family of Ardkinlass, by the recommendation of the Earl of Argyle got a grant of the bishopric of Bre- chin, whilst he was yet a boy, with a new and hitherto un- heard of power, viz. " cum potestate sibi, dare et disponere " singula beneficia, tarn spiritualitatis quam temporalitatis " dignitatis, aut alia, infra diocesin Brechinen, nunc vacan. " aut quando eadem vacare contigerit, quae prius dona- " tioni episcoporum Brechinen. pertinuerunt,"" [May 16. 1566, Reg. Priv. Sig.] And truly he made sufficient use afterwards of this power, for he alienated most part of the lands and tithes of the bishopric to his chief and patron the Earl of Argyle, retaining for his successors scarce so much as would be a moderate competency for a minister in Brechin. This same person, on the 7th of May 1567, gets a licence from the queen to depart and continue forth of the realm for the space of seven years : (though it seems he was not gone two years after ; for Alexander bishop of Bre- chin is marked to have been present with Regent Moray in the convention at Perth 28th July 1569, and this, too, with the particular designation of Alexander bishop of Bre r chin in the rolls of that meeting :) And, conformable to this licence, there is a particular instruction in the book of As- sumptions, that this bishop was abroad at Geneva, at the schools, on the 28th of January 1573-4, \_Keltlis Hist. p. 507, and App. p. 181 ;] so the readers may judge what age he has been of at the time of the grant of the bishopric. After his return home, he sometime exercised the office of particular pastor at Brechin, without discharging any part of the Episcopal function, though he still retained the de- signation of bishop, and sat in many Parliaments on the THE SEE OF BRECHIN. 16? spiritual side, till the time of his death, which only fell out in the beginning of the year 1606. 2. ANDREW LAMB, 1610.] Andrew Lamb, minister at Burntisland, succeeded in this see anno 1606, where he con- tinued till the year 1619 when he was translated to Galloway. He was one of the three bishops who went by the king's order into England, where he received Episcopal consecra- tion on the 20th October 1610. 3. DAVID LINDSAY, 1619-] David Lindsay, son to Colonel John Lindsay, a brother of the house of Edzel in Angus, was minister at Dundee, and now made bishop of Brechin, and consecrated at S.t Andrews 23d November 1619- He appears by his writings to have been a man of good learning ; and, no doubt upon account of this, he was translated to the see of Edinburgh anno 1634. 4. WALTER WHITFOED, 1634.] Walter Whitford, son " of James Whitford of that ilk 2 , was first minister at Monk- land and subdean of Glasgow, then rector of Moffat, and retained his subdeanry in commendam. In 1620 he was made doctor of divinity ; and in September 1634 he was consecrated bishop of Brechin, in which see he continued until he was deprived by the Assembly in 1638, after which he fled into England, as being reckoned a forward man for the Liturgy and book of Canons ; and there he died in the year 1643. 5. DAVID STRACHAN, 1662.] David Strachan, a branch of the house of Thorntoun in Mearns, was parson of Fet- tercairn, and upon the king's restoration promoted to the see of Brechin, and consecrated 1st June 1662, where he continued until his death anno 1671. 2 By Margaret, his wife, daughter of Sir James Soincrvilk of Canine than. 16$ THE SEE OF BRECHIN. 6. ROBERT LAURIE, 167-.] Robert Laurie, son of Joseph Laurie, minister at Stirling, was first appointed to the charge of a parish ; and being a celebrated preacher, and a man of moderation, he was upon the Restoration made dean of Edinburgh, and then advanced to the see of Brechin ; but the benefice of this bishopric being small, he was allowed to retain his deanry, and continued to exercise a particular ministry at the church of the Holy Trinity in Edinburgh, till his death in the year 1677. 7. GEORGE HALIBURTOX, 1678.] George Haliburton, minister at Coupar of Angus, was consecrated bishop of this see anno 1678 ; and was translated thence to the see of Aberdeen in the year 1682. 8. ROBERT DOUGLAS, 1682.] Robert Douglas, a lineal branch of Douglas of Glenbervy in the shire of the Mearns, afterwards Earls of Angus, now Dukes of Douglas, was born anno 1626. He had his education in the King's college of Aberdeen, was minister first at Laurencekirk in the Mearns, then of Bothwell, Renfrew, and Hamilton, next dean of Glasgow, from whence he was promoted to the see of Bre- chin anno 1682, and anno 1684 was translated to the bi- shopric of Dunblane. [Memoir by the Reverend Mr Ro- bert Douglas, son to this prelate.] 9- ALEXANDER CAIRNCROSS, 1684.] Alexander Cairn- cross (see an account of him in the See of Glasgow,) was consecrated bishop of Brechin in August 1684. Some say he was consecrated bishop of Brechin on the 19th June 1684 ; and on the 6th of December following there is a presentation to him of the temporality of the archbishopric of Glasgow, of which see he is now said to be elect. [Se- cretary's Books.] THE SEE OF BRECHIN. 169 10. JAMES DBUMMOXD, 1684.] James Druminond, son to James Drummond minister at Fowlis in the shire of Perth, was first minister at Ochterardour, then parson of Muthill ; was afterward, on the 25th December 1684, in the church of Holyroodhouse, consecrated bishop of Bre- chin. The king's warrant for his consecration is dated the 6th of December 1684, [Secretary's Books, V. IX.] where he continued until the Revolution in 1688 deprived him with the rest of his brethren the bishops. He lived after this for the most part with the Earl of Errol ; and he died in the year 1695, aged 66 years. It is to be said of this prelate, that though he had been promoted by the favour of his chief, the Earl of Perth, then chancellor of the king- dom, yet he always shewed himself as averse to popery as any person in the church ; and it is certain there were but very few of the bishops (if any at all) who favoured an al- teration in religion.* * Some additional facts respecting this see will be found in the Appendix, Note L. 170 FORMERLY there was a convent of Culdees here, and con- tinued so to be even after the erection of the bishopric, which owes its foundation to King David II.* towards the end of his reign. St Blaan was superior of this convent in the time of King Kenneth III., and from him the see de- rived its name. [Britan. Sancta.] The writs of this see have been so neglected, or perhaps wilfully destroyed, that no light can be got from thence to guide us aright in making up the list of its ancient bishops ; and, besides, there are so many visible blanks, with ana- chronisms, in such gleanings as can be picked up here and there, that I cannot pretend to give an exact successive list of the prelates of this see. Time may possibly bring things to light ; but I must content myself with doing the best for the present--^ M. 115.] M. is bishop of this see as far back as the days of Pope Hadrian IV. [Nicolson's Hist. Library, App. No. 5. p. 353.] But it remains a question, Whether the bulla there mentioned be genuine or not ? LAURENTIUS, 1160.] Laurentius is bishop of this see, and a witness, together with Arnold bishop of St Andrews, to a charter to the abbey of Dunfermline, [Dalrymple's Coll. p. 274.] Laur. is bishop here, and contempo- rary with Arnold and Edward bishops of St Andrews and * This should be David I., as appears from the Chronology of the Bishops. | See Scotichronicon for the pretensions of this see to jurisdiction in Eng- land, Vol. II. p. 160. THE SEE OF DUNBLANE. 171 Aberdeen, and with John and Osbert abbots of Kelso and Jedburgh, [Cart. Dunferm.] L. is likewise bishop of Dunblane in the time of Richard bishop of St Andrews, of Andrew bishop of Caithness, and of Sams bishop of Brechin. [C. Cambusk.] SIMON, 117-.] Simon is l bishop of Dunblane, contem- rary with Robert, Adam, and Guido, abbots of Scone, Coupar, and Lindores ; and Jonathan and Abraham, bi- shops here, confirm Simon's deed, [ Cart. Aberbr.] Simon is bishop here in the time of King William, and in the time of Simon and Andrew bishops of Moray and Caith- ness, and of Matthew bishop of Aberdeen, {Cart. Aberbr. et Morav.~\ S. is bishop here in the time of King William, J. M. J. T. bishops of Glasgow, Aberdeen, Dunkeld, and Brechin, [Cart. Dunfer.] S. is bishop here, [Cart. Cam- busTc. f. 164.] This bishop grants a confirmation of the church of Logy-Aithray, near Stirling, within his diocese, to tlie nuns of North Berwick, [Charter in the family of Marchmchit, but without date.] JONATHAN, 12 .] Jonathan archdeacon of Dunblane, as he is designed in the above writ of confirmation by his predecessor, was the next who filled the see, [C. Aberbr.] Jonathan is bishop here, [C. Cambusk. fol. 163.] J. is bishop here in the time of Gilbert prior of St Andrews, who was promoted to that office in 1196, and died in 1198 ; and he is contemporary with R. and R. bishops of Dunkeld and Brechin, \Melros.~] and with Guido and Archenb. abbots of Lindores and Dunfermline, [C. Aberbr.] " Anno 1210 " obiit Jonathas episcopus Dunblanensis, et sepultus est " apud Inchaffray." [Ford. Vol. I. p. 529.] 1 Simon is to be met with in the year 1178, being a witness to a charter alongst with Turpin elect of Brechin, [Cart. Priorat. S. Andreae.] Mac- 172 THE SEE OF DUNBLANE. WILLIAM, 3210.] There was certainly one of this name bishop'of Dunblane in the reign of King Alexander II. [C. Camb.] Archbishop Spotiswood says, he was the chancellor of that name, William de Bosco, and that he was bishop before he was chancellor. If the archbishop had good authority for this, William must have been bishop here before the year 1211, at which time he became chan- cellor. [Melros. it.- Officers of State."] ABRAHAM, 1220.] Abraham, promoted in the time of King William, [C. Aberbr.'] is bishop here in the fourth or fifth years of Pope Honorius, and is contemporary with William bishop of St Andrews, [C. Dunferm.~\ There are writs by him in the cartulary of Cambuskenneth, f. 81. RADULFUS, Elect, 122-.] Radulfus elect of Dunblane. In the cartulary of Aberbrothock, in the Lawyers Library at Edinburgh, fol. 6. cart. 87, viz. " Carta domini Fergus, " fratris domini Rob. comitis de Strathern, test, domino *' Rad. electo Dunblan. domino Innocentio abbate de In- ** chaffraie," which is a good voucher for Radulphus being bishop elect of this see in the time of King Alexander II. for Robert earl of Strathern lived in that reign. OSBERT, 1230.] There are also writs by this bishop in the cartulary of Cambuskenneth, f. 81, ut supra. " Anno " 1231 [Fordun^ Obiit Osbertus ep. Dunblanen." CLEMENT, 1233.] Clement, a Dominican, or preaching friar, was advanced to this see, and consecrated by William bishop of St Andrews, at the Stow church of Wedale, " in " die translationis Sti Cuthberti" anno 1233, and died anno 1258, [C. Melr.] He is bishop here in the twentieth year of King Alexander II. [C. Newbot. et Balm.] and in the 35th and last year of the same king, i. e. anno Dom. 1249, \Cart. Camb.1 Clement is bishop here anno 1253, and THE SEE OF DUNBLANE. 173 1254, [Rymer .] Clement is bishop of this see, and witness to a charter by Malisius earl of Strathern to Gilbert de Haya, [Errol.] Clement is bishop here, and witness to Roger de Quenci, constable of Scotland, [C. Scone,~\ And Clement is bishop here in the eight year of King Alexander II. i, e. 1222, {Cart, Glasg\~] but as this is inconsistent with all the other vouchers both for the chronology of this and the former bishops, I judge it ought to be either the 28th of King Alexander II. i. e. anno Dom. 1242, or else the eight of King Alexander III. i. e. anno Dom. 1257, either of which comes within the compass of time assigned to him by the chronicle of Melrose above.* N. B. Upon the authority of a writ by the chapter of this see, in the time of this Bishop Clement, viz. anno 1239, I have ranked four of the preceding bishops ; for therein they say that they have seen the letters of Simon, Jonathan, Abra- ham, and Osbert, sometime bishops of Dunblane, [C. Cam- busk.'] and I suppose that the space of time, down from Bi- shop William to Bishop Clement, being about thirty years, may very well suffice for the above four bishops, especially as it seems to be agreed that Bishop Simon lived scarcely one year, [Spotis."] but if better authority cast up after- wards, I shall be well pleased. ROBERT DE PRAEBENDA, 1258.] Robert de Praebenda, dean of Dunblane, was the successor of Clement, [Mdros.] He was elect of Dunblane anno 1258, and bishop anno 1275, [C. Glasg.~\ He was sent with Richard bishop of Dunkeld, in the year 1268, to protest against the contribu- tions imposed upon the Scots clergy by Ottobon, [Hay's MS.~\ " Rob. Ep. Dunblan." is with W. bishop of St An- drews, Robert de Brus earl of Carrick, and Richard de * According to Fordun, L. X. c. ii. Clement bishop of Dunblane died 1266: " Variarum linguarum interpres eloquentissimus, yir potens sermone " ct opere coram Deo et hominibus." THE SEE OF DUNBLANE. Stratun, sent ambassador by King Alexander II. to Ed- ward I. of England, 10th July 1277, \Rymer, Tom. II. p. 84] He is bishop here anno 1271, 72, 81, 82. [C. Cambusk.~\ ALPIK.] After Robert, Archbishop Spotiswood inserts one Alpin ; but of him I have not chanced to see any re- cord remaining. WILLIAM, 1290."] William was bishop of this see in the year 1290, [Foed. Ang.~] On the 12th July 1291, he signs a submission to Edward I. King of England, [Rag. Rol. p. 12. in Nisbefs Herat. V. II.] He was bishop here anno 1292, [Cart. Aberbr.~\ At what time this bishop came into this see, or when he died, I can see no proper instruc- tion ; but find that he is one of those who were chosen by John Baliol in the controversy betwixt him and Robert Bruce, June 5. 1292. [Rymer, Tom. II. p. 555.] NICOLAS DE BALMYLE, 1307.] Nicolas de Balmyle, who had been clerk in the monastery of Arbroath, and after- wards parson of Calder. He was made chancellor of Scotland at Candlemas 1301, [Cart. Prior. St And.~\ In anno 1307, the chancellor was removed from that office, and put into this see, [See a foot-note on p. 17. Officers of' State.] He was bishop here before the year 1309, [Anderson's Inde- pency, App. No. 14.] He is bishop in the year 1311 and 15, [Cart. Cambusk.] in 1312 and 13, [Cart. Aberbr.~] and in the 7th year of King Robert I. [Cart. SconeJ\ He died in the year 1319 or 20, \Eymer .] Upon his decease, King Edward II. of England wrote to the Pope, desiring him to prefer to the see of Dunblane " Richardum de Pontefracto," a Dominican friar, 25th June anno 1320, \Rymer ;] but it seems that this recommendation had not success, for it is certain that Mauritius was next bishop here. THE SEE OF DUNBLANE. 175 MAURITIUS, 1319.] Mauritius, abbot of Inchaffray, was bishop of this see as early as the same year, 1319, [Cart. Aberd.] and also in the 13th and 20th year of King Ro- bert I. [Scon.] He was bishop anno 1327, [Cart. Glasg.~] He was contemporary with William, and William, and John^ bishops of St Andrews, Dunkeld, and Glasgow, [C. Kels.~\ " Mauritius episcopus Dunblanensis" is witness to " Murdacus comes de Menteith," [R. Cliar. B. III. No. 107- but without date:] Only it is to be remembered, that this Murdach was the last of the old Earls of Menteith, and that he lost his life at the battle of Halidon-hill, anno 1333. Maurice was bishop here, and witness to a dona- tion of Margaret Stewart, &c. dowager of Angus, and La- dy Abernethy, widow of John Stewart earl of Angus, to the monks of Arbroath. The donation is without date, but must have been after the year 1377, [C. Aberbr.~\ Mr Hay says he was a person of great spirit, and gave great encou- ragement at the famous battle of Bannockburn, and was therefore chosen by King Robert Bruce to be his confessor. WILLIAM, 1353.] William is bishop of Dunblane in the year 1353, at which time he confirms a judgment given concerning his see in the times of Nicholas de Balmyle and of Mauritius his immediate successor, [Cart. Dunferm.] And William, bishop here about the year 1361, is witness to a grant made by " Joanna comitissa de Strathern," [C. C ambush. ~\ And though it might be alleged that the names Walter and William having the same initial letter, the person might still be the same, yet in this grant by the countess the name Willelmus is written at full length. I have not seen any other instruction for this Bishop William, except that Spotiswood sets down one of this name after Bishop Maurice, and after him again Walter, in which the archbishop may have reason. " Willielmus episcopus Dun- blanensis" is one of the Scots prelates who obliges himself to put all those under ecclesiastical censures who were in THE SEE OF DUNBLANE. any way infringing the agreement made concerning the re- demption of King David II. 26th September 1357. [Rymer. .] WALTER CAMBUSLAXG, 1662.] Walter, to whom Bi- shop Spotiswood gives the surname of Cambuslang, was bishop of this see in the year 1362, [Nisb. Herald. Vol. II. App. p. 195. it. Cfy. Glasg.~\ He was bishop of Dunblane in the time of Robert Stewart earl of Strathern, (afterwards King Robert II.) who obtained that earldom in the year 1367. Walter, " Wautier evesque de Dunblan." is wit- ness to the 14 years truce betwixt Scotland and England, dated at the castle of Edinburgh, 20th July 1369. \Ry- mer, Tom. VI.] ANDREAS .] " Andreas, Dunblanensis episcopus," appends his seal to that memorable act made April 1. 1373, in the Parliament holden at Scone, whereby the succession to the crown of Scotland was settled. DOUGAL, 138-.] " Dougal episcopus Dunblanensis \Hay MS.~\ N- B. I have placed the two preceding bishops in the order in which they stand, by the authority of a writ that will appear in the following bishop. NICOLAS, Elect, 1273.] Nicolas abl:ot of Scone was next elected ; but the Pope not agreeing to the election, after he had gone to Rome for consecration anno 1273, the chapter was appointed to proceed to a new election, which fell upon ARCHIBALD, archdeacon of Moray l . This prelate, in the year 1275, makes a solemn composition of an affair that had been long in debate between his predecessors, Gilbert, * He is said to have alo translated the Psalms and Gospels into Gaelic ; but there is great reason to doubt whether either he or the people under his care understood a word of that language. 1 This prelate's surname was Heroc, or Hayrock, an antient family about Elgin in Moray, of which there are some still existing. "VVarinus de Heroc is mentioned in 1257 and 1244, as is Hugh Heroc, or Hayrock, his brother, in 1244 and 1248. This last, or another Hugh Heroc, founded a chaplainry at Daldaleith in 1286. [CA. Morav.} THE SEE OF CAITHNESS. 211 William, and Walter, bishops of Caithness, and William, father and son, Earls of Sutherland, ' inter venerabiles pa- ' tres, praedecessores nostros, Gilbertum, Willielmum, et * Walterum bonae memoriae Episcopos Cathaniae ex una ' parte, et nobiles viros Willielmum clarae memoriae, et ' Willielmum ejus filium, comites Sutherlandiae, 1 &c. dated 10. Kalend. Oct. 1275, [Dalr. Coll p. 423;] and Sir James tells, that the Earl of Sutherland's claim of preceden- cy against the Earls of Crawford, Errol, and Marischal, is founded on this writ of Archibald bishop of Caithness ; and Mr. Nisbet, in his Book of Heraldry, Vol. I. p. 259, avers that he saw the principal writ of agreement. This bishop died, it is said, in the year 1288. LAN ST. EDMONDS, 1290.] Alan, whose surname was St. Edmunds, an Englishman born and bred 2 , was bishop of this see in the year 1290, (by the influence, no doubt, of Edward king of England,) at which time he is one of the Scottisli bishops who concurred with the lords of the regen- cy in proposing to that king a marriage betwixt his son the prince and our young Queen Margaret ; and when the pro- ject was found to be agreeable, our prelate was joined in commission with Bishop Wishart of Glasgow, and Sir John Cumin, to negotiate that important affair, [Rymer;~\ which nothing but the death of the young lady, in all likelihood, would have put a stop to. The bishop was, in the year 1291, made lord chancellor on the 12th of June, and he took an oath to King Edward as superior and direct lord of the kingdom of Scotland. Yet it seems King Edward had not entire confidence in the bishop, forasmuch as he 2 Although the surname of St. Edmonds be originally English, and in all probability derived from St. Edmonds-Bury, in the county of Suffolk, yet it is far from being certain that this prelate was a native Englishman, as there was a family of this name settled in Perth as early as the latter end of King "William's or beginning of King Alexander II.'s reign, who are frequently to be met with in the chartulary of Scone, Sic. 212 THE SEE OF CAITHNESS. thought fit to join a clerk of his own, Walter Agmunde- shain, in the office with him ; and thereupon the foresaid king directs a warrant to Sir Alexander Baliol, lord cham- berlain of Scotland, to pay to the bishop, the chancellor, 20 merks per month, and 10 merks to Mr Agmundesham his colleague, commencing from the day of their entry to the office, \Rymer , and Officers of State.] This bishop died in the year 1292. King Edward I.'s officers seized into the king's hands all the goods and chattels which the bishop had at the time of his decease, (he having died intestate,) ac- cording to the custom of Scotland ; but that king, out of his special grace for the former good services done him by the bishop, ordered all the goods, &c. to be delivered to the prior of Coldingham, and to Mr Adam St. Edmunds par- son of Lastalrick, brother to the said bishop. [Prynne, Vol. III. p. 543, &c.] * Whether the see continued vacant all the time from the death of the former bishop, I cannot tell ; but there is no account of any other, unless ANDREW, whom Archbishop Spotiswood places in this see, and says that he lived 13 years ; whose successor he makes to be FERQUHARD DE BALLEGANACH, whom the Appendix to Archbishop Spotiswood places in this see anno 1301. He is bishop here before the year 1309, [Anders. Indep. App. No. 14.] and here this bishop is surnamed Balleganube ; but most probably his true name was Bellejambe, (I. e. well limbed.) He recognizes King Robert I.'s title to the crown of Scotland, as appears on a new inspection of the chartu- lary of Moray ; so that there seems to be but one Ferquhard bishop. Ferquhard is bishop of Caithness anno 1321, * See Ayloffe, p. 106, for an order from Edward I. to this Bishop, de quer- ciibia adfabricam cathedralis stiae. THE SEE OF CAITHNESS. 213 [Reg. Chart, et Nisbefs Herald. Vol. I. p. 163.] He is called Ferchard Cleranumbe in the same year, [Reg. Cltart. Vol. I. p. 60.] Ferchard is said to have been a strenuous defender of the liberties of the church, and to have died anno 1328. [Hay.} DAVID, 13 .] David died in the year 1348. How long he sat bishop, I have not discovered. THOMAS DE FIKGASK, 1348.] Thomas de Fingask was employed in divers embassies into England during the cap- tivity of King David II. [Feed. Ang.] He was bishop of this see anno 1348 and 1357, [Ibid.] arid anno 1359, [C. Morav.] He was bishop, February the last, in the 23d year of King David II. [Mar ;] item, anno reg. 29, [Hay.} He died anno 1360. ALEXANDER MAX, 1389.] Alexander, 3 bishop of Caith- ness, his surname Man. He is witness to a deed in the chartulary of Moray, dated anno 1389, " in Vigilia Apos- tolorum Simonis et Judae," [i. e. Oct. 28.] He is also witness to a charter of the Earl of Sutherland anno 1400. He died anno 1409- MALCOLM, 1410.] Malcolm was bishop here at the time of the Parliament in Scone, 3d April 1373, in the third year of King Robert II. [Writs of Mar.] He was bishop the same year of the same king, [Cart. Aberd.] He died anno 1421. N. B. There must have been two Malcolms, one before and one after Alexander, to make every thing agree here. 3 This Alexander Man is witness to several charters in anno 1381, where- in he is designed " Arckidiaconus Ecclesiae Rossensis," [Chart penes Jaco- bum Mercer de Aldie, Arrmg.] 214 THE SEE OF CAITHNESS. ROBERT STRATHBROCK, 1444.] Robert Strathbrock, descended from an ancient race of burgesses at Aberdeen, who were proprietors of the lands of Foveran in vie. de Aberdeen, in King David II/s time, [Chart, Aberd.~\ He was bishop in the year 1444. [Reg- Chart. ~\ JOHN INNES, 1447.] John Innes, a son of the family of Innes, and dean of Ross. He died anno 1448. WILLIAM MOODIE, 145.] William Moodie was bi- shop here anno 1455, [Reg. Chart.] and died anno 1460. PROSPER, Elect.] Prosper was elected bishop of this see, but resigned in favour of JOHN SINCLAIR, son to that Earl of Caithness who was chancellor of the kingdom in the time of King James II. ; but Archbishop Spotiswood tells, that neither was Mr Sin- clair ever consecrated, and that the see continued vacant the space of 24 years, during which time Mr ADAM GORDON, dean of Caithness, and parson of Pettie, third son to Alexander earl of Huntly, a man of singular good learning, governed the affairs of this see, and afterwards as vicar-general to Bishop Stewart. He died at Elgin, June 4. 1528. [Hay.] ANDREW STEWART, 1490.] Andrew Stewart, commen- dator of Kelso and Fearn. This Andrew Stewart, abbot of Fearn, was a natural son of the house of Invermeath, whose legitimation is to be seen in the public records. He was bishop here anno 1490, [Reg. Chart.] He was bishop anno 1504 and 1516, [Rymer.] He was bishop anno 1515, [ErroL] He was both bishop and treasurer, February 11. 1511, [Mar,~\ and March 10. [C. AberdJ} and he was bishop THE SEE OF CAITHNESS. 215 and lord-treasurer in, the years 1511, 1512, 1514, and 1515, [Reg- Cfuirt] And yet the learned antiquary, Mr George Crawford, observes, that by the Exchequer rolls it appaars that Cuthbert, commendator of Glenluce, was made lord- treasurer on the 28th of October 1512. He died June 17. 1518. [Sir Robert Gordon's History of the Earls of Sutherland.] , ANDREW STEWART, 1518.] Andrew Stewart, son to John earl of Athole, and who had been postulate of the see of Dunkeld, came next into this see of Caithness, anno 1518, in which station he died in the year 1542. [Lives Officers of State.] ROBERT STEWART, Elect and Administrator, 1542.] Robert Stewart, brother to the Earl of Lenox, and provost of Dunbarton college, was elected bishop of this see the same year his predecessor died, [Rymer] ; and this much is likewise confirmed by letters of the lord governor, who takes notice to the Pope, on the 12th day of December 1544, how that his Holiness had three years ago committed to this Robert the administration of the cathedral church of Caithness, " admodum adolescenti," [Ep. Reg. Scot. V. II. p. 222 ;] and the elect bishop, or bishop-administrator, hav- ing taken part with his brother the Earl of Lennox, against the EarJ of Arran, governor of the kingdom, he incurred the same forfeiture with his brother, and was obliged to abscond the space of full 22 years. He never was in priests orders, [Ibid.] ; and upon his return home, he turned with the times, and became Protestant, but still bore the title of bishop of Caithness, and enjoyed the revenue tiD his death. After the death of Regent Moray, and the accession of his brother, the Earl of Lennox, to that supreme office, he got a gift of the priory of St Andrews, which he afterwards retained all his life. In the year 1576, the honour of Earl of Lennox de- volved on him by the death of his nephew Charles ; but as 216 THE SEE OF CAITHNESS. he had no legal issue of his own body, he thought fit to re- sign that honour in favours of his grand-nephew, Esme Stewart, Lord D^Aubigny ; and, in place thereof, he had the title of Earl of March conferred upon him, anno 1579- He married a daughter of the Earl of Athole, and lived private- ly at St Andrews for a long space, until he died there on the 29th of March 1 586, in the 70th year of his age, leav- ing behind him one natural daughter. He was bishop here, or had the title of bishop, in the month of September 1583, [Writs Family ofMar.~\ He gifted away much of the rents, both of his bishopric and priory, [Register of Gifts, Pensions, $c. in the time of the Four Regents.} Though there be no ground to think that this person was ever duly, and according to the constant invariable usage of the primitive Catholic Church, vested with any sacred character at all, yet it is a little diverting to observe how the men at the helm of public affairs, in those days, grant com- mission to him to assist in the consecration of other men to the sacred office of bishops. I persuade myself the pream- ble of the following commission will surprise most people : * Our Sovereign Lord, with advice, &c. ordains an * letter to be made under the Great Seal, in due form, di- 4 rect to the Reverend Father in God, Robert bishop of ' Caithness, and the superintendents of Angus, Fife, Lo- 4 thian, or any utheris lauchful bischopis and superinten- ' dents within this realm, commanding * them to consecrate the said Mr John Douglas, electit, as 6 said is, an bischop and pastour of the metropolitan kirk of * St Androis, at Leith, the 9th day of ' February, the year of GOD 1571. 1 During the absence of this bishop, it is said that this see was committed to Alexander Gordon, son to George earl of Huntly. [Rich. Aug. Hay.} THE SEE OF CAITHNESS. 217 REFORMATION. J. After the death of the Earl of March, King James VI. made an offer of the bishopric of Caithness to Mr Ro- bert Pont, provost of the Trinity collegiate dhurch at Edinburgh, rector likewise of St Cuthbert's, now called the West-Kirk, beside Edinburgh, and, by a dispensation from the General Assembly, a senator of the College of Justice. But Mr Pont declined to accept thereof without consent of the church ; whereupon this see remained void, until the Assembly, in the year 1600, agreed that a certain number of clergymen should sit and vote in Parliament. 2. GEORGE GLADSTANES, 1600.] George Gladstones, minister at St Andrews, was preferred by the king to the see of Caithness anno 1600, [Chart. Publ.] and he was translated thence to the see of St Andrews anno 1606. He was named a commissioner for uniting the two kingdoms anno 1604. 3." ALEXANDER FORBES, 1606.] Alexander Forbes, rector of Fettercairn in Mearns, was promoted to this see 12th November 1606, where he sat till he was translated to Aberdeen anno 1615. 4. JOHN ABERNETHY, 1624.] John Abernethy, minis- ter at Jedburgh, was next preferred to the see of Caithness, but still retained his pastoral charge at Jedburgh. I have seen letters to John bishop of Caithness anno 1626, R. K. at which time Mr John Gray was dean of Caithness. By the general register of sasines he was bishop here the 2d of November 1624, and he was minister at Jedburgh 22d Ja- nuary 1607- By his writings he appears a man of good 218 THE SEE OF CAITHNESS. literature. He was deprived by the wildness of the Assem- bly in 1638. In a synod held by him at Dornoch in 1623, it was decreed, that every entering minister should pay the first year's stipend to the reparation and maintenance of that cathedral. In this bishop's time Dornoch was made a burgh -royal. 5. PATRICK FORBES, 1662.] Patrick Forbes, son of the famous Presbyterian incumbent at Alford in the shire of Aberdeen, was advanced to this bishopric 19th March 1662, which he possessed until his death anno 1680. [Dal- las and Mr David Simpson's Information.] 6. ANDREW WOOD, 1680.] Andrew Wood, son of Da- vid Wood, a minister, by M lle . Guthrie, sister to John Guthrie of that Ilk, and bishop of Moray, was minister at Spot first, and next at Dunbar, both in East-Lothian ; from which last place he was raised to be bishop of the Isles in the year 1678, [Ibid.] and then was translated to the see of Caithness anno 1680, where he continued till the Revo- lution in 1688. He died at Dunbar anno 1695, aged 76 years. [Id.] * * For a few notices relative to the See of Caithness, see Append. Note O. 219 THE SEE OF ORKNEY. As the Isles of Orkney were in ancient ages in a fluctu- ating state, sometimes under the jurisdiction of the crown of Scotland, and oftener under that of Norway, it is na- tural enough to think, and experience confirms, that no true account can be had of the ancient ecclesiastical state of these isles. Some say, that St Servanus, who had been sent to the Scots by Pope Celestine I. in the beginning of the fifth century, was ordained a bishop by St Palladius, and was sent into the isles of Orkney to preach the gospel there ; and Polidore Virgil narrates, that he performed his business to very good purpose : while others again relate, that St Colin, in the reign of our King Kenneth III. did labour much in the conversion of these barbarous islanders, [Britan. Sanct.] But who were the successors to St Serva- nus, or whether he had any such successors, nobody pre- tends to say. Torffaeus, the Danish historian, in Hls- torla Orcadum, doubts of the accounts given of the bishops of these isles, such as Thorolphus, Adalbertus, and Rodul- phus Novellus, which last is fixed to the year 1138, [Joan. Prior Hagulst.] Concerning this bishop, the continuator of Florence says, ' Quoniam nee principis terrae, nee cleri, * nee plebis electione, velassensu, fuerat ordinatus, ab omni- * bus refutatus, 1 &c. The archbishop of York had used to ordain bishops with the title of Orkney ^ but the before- mentioned historian is of opinion, that they were merelv titulars, to give the greater show of authority to the see of York ; and he is positive that none of these bishops did 220 THE SEE OF ORKNEY. ever reside in the isles of Orkney, and that Rodulf, de- signed bishop of Orkney, had been a presbyter of York ; yet some say that RADULFUS Ep. Oread, is witness to a charter of King David I. [Augusto WILLIAM, .] William is by Torffaeus reckoned the first bishop who had a fixed residence in the Orkneys, [ Torff. p. 161.] though severals were dignified with the title of bishops of Orkney before his time. WILLIAM, .] William II. succeeded anno , and died anno 1188. [Torff. Ibid.] BIARN, .] Biarn succeeded to William, and died September 15. 1223. [Torff. Ibid.] JOFREIR, 1223.] Jofreir was his successor anno 1223, and died anno 1246. [Torff. p. 164.] ILEROY, 1248.] Hervy or Haufir, was made bishop of Orkney anno 1248 or 49- [Idem, p. 165.] HENRY, .] Henry bishop of Orkney, perhaps the same with Hervy, died anno 1269- [Idem, p. 172.] PETRUS, 1270.] Petrus succeeded Henry in anno 1270. He was one of the ambassadors sent by Eric king of Nor- way, to negociate a marriage betwixt that monarch and Margaret daughter to Alexander III. king of Scotland, which was finally concluded at Roxburgh, " in festo Sancti Jacobi apostoli," anno 1281, [Rymer, Tom. II. p..l079.] He died anno 1284. [Torff. p. 172.] * But not as a subject of the king; at least not qua Epit. Oread fn. THE SEE OF ORKNEY. 221 DOLGFIXNUS, 1286.] Dolgfinnus was made bishop of Orkney anno 1286. [Tor/. Ibid.] WILLIAM, 1310.] William was made bishop of Ork- ney anno 1310, [Tor/. Ibid, et DaLrymptes Coll p. 276-7,] and is mentioned in an indenture betwixt Robert I. king of Scotland and Haquin V. king of Norway, apud Inner- ness, 1312. [Ex Char. W. Macf. de eodem.] WILLIAM, .] William bishop of Orkney, but surely because of the distance of time not the same with the former, was cruelly murdered anno 1383, though neither the cause, author, or circumstances thereof are mentioned. [ Tor/, p. 177.] WILLIAM, 1390.] Another William bishop of Orkney is mentioned in the time of King Robert III. [Spotiswood,] anno 1390, [Appendix to Spotiszvood.] HEXRY, 1394.] Henry bishop of Orkney is mentioned anno 1394 [Tor/, p. 178.]* THOMAS DE TULLOCH, 1422.] Thomas de Tulloch, or de Tholach, as Torffaeus has it, was in great favour with Eric king of Denmark, &c. from whom he obtained the admi- nistration of the Orkney islands in anno 1422, and in 1427. He seems to be a younger son of the Tullochs of Boriing- ton in vie. de Forfar. He is mentioned by William earl of Orkney in the year 1434, [Rich. Aug. Hay's MS.~\ He obtained from King Henry VI. of England letters of safe- conduct for himself and eight persons in his retinue, for the space of one whole year ; dated at Westminster the 18th November 1441. [Rymer, Tom. XI. p. 1.] * In 1396, the bishop of Orkney attended the coronation of Erick king of Sweden, Norway, and Denmark, at Calmar ; probably as being a native of one of those countries. THE SEE OF ORKNEY. WILLIAM, 1448.] William bishop of Orkney is wit- ness to an evident, dated the 15th day of April 1448, [Hay] After this there is a manifest blank in this see, since the next bishop we can find any account of is WILLIAM TULLOCH, cousin to the former Bishop Thomas Tulloch, of the house of Bonington, who was bishop of this see in the reign of King James III. and was sent by that prince into Denmark in the year 1468, together with se- veral other noble personages, to negociate a marriage be- twixt him and the princess Margaret of that nation, which they had the good fortune to effectuate. He was bishop here anno 1470, {Reg Chart.] He was bishop of Orkney anno 1471, [Rolls of Parliament,] in the which year he was appointed one of the administrators of the Exche- quer, [Rotul. Jac. III.] He was likewise made Lord Privy- seal, March 26. 1473, an. reg. 13. William is bishop of Orkney and Privy-seal, [Clackmannan.] He was the same December 2. 1474, [C. Glasg.~\ and anno 1474 and 1476, {Reg. Chart] He was one of the ambassadors sent to England 1471, [Rymer, Tom. II. p. 717.] Id. 1472, March 15. [Rymer] He was translated from the see of Moray anno 1477. See the Bishops of Moray, also Richard Augustine Hay, concerning a MS. history of his. AXDREW, 1478.] Andrew was bishop of Orkney anno Dem. 1478 and 1479, an. reg. 20. [Reg. Chart.]-and, N.B. By the charter 1478, it appears that William had lately been bishop. This bishop had the town of Kirkwall erect- ed into a royal burgh in the year 1486, [ Wallace] He was bishop anno 1488, [C. Mor.] Mr Hay avers, that An- drew bishop of Orkney is witness to a charter of Roslin's anno 1491. He obtains from King Henry VII. of Eng- land letters of safe-conduct for himself and twelve persons in his retinue anno 1494, [Rymer, Tom. XII. p. 550 ;] and we find him still bishop 1494, 1499, and 1501, [Reg. Chart.] THE SEE OF ORKNEY. 223 EDWARD STEWART, 1511.] Edward Stewart was bishop of Orkney anno 1511, [Reg. Chart, .] This was a person of illustrious birth, of whom Hector Boece, the historian, gives a notable character, ab anno 1538. THOMAS, .] Thomas bishop of Orkney made a mor- tification for maintenance of the quiristers of his cathedral. ROBERT MAXWELL, 15 .] Robert Maxwell, a son of Sir John Maxwell of Pollock, was rector of Torbolton in the year 1521, and next was provost of the collegiate church in the town of Dunbarton, and at last was promoted to this see of Orkney. He built the stalls in his cathedral, which are curiously engraven with the arms of several of his ante- cessors in his see ; and he furnished the steeple with a set of excellent bells, which were cast within the castle of Edin- burgh, by Robert BortliAvick, as the inscription on them bears. In the year 1536, when the king made his famous progress through the isles belonging to his crown, his Ma- jesty was nobly entertained by this bishop at his own charges ; and at this time the king was pleased to give the town of Kirkwall a confirmation of its royalty. [Lesley, &c.] ROBERT REID, 1540.] Robert Reid bishop of Orkney was son to John Reid of Aikenhead, who was slain valiant- ly fighting at the battle of Flodden September 9. 1513, by Elizabeth or Bessie Schanwell, his wife, sister to John abbot of Coupar, and Mr Robert Schanwell vicar of Kirk- caldy, who was made one of the first lords of Council and Session in anno 1537, by King James V., at the institution of the College of Justice. He was born at Aikenhead anno He was educated at St Salvator's college, (in the university of St Andrews,) under Mr Hugh Spens, then a famous divine, principal thereof. He was first subdean, then official or commissary of Moray ; and in anno 1526 he was nominated by Thomas Chrystal, abbot of Kinloss, his 224 THE SEE OF ORKNEY. successor in that abbacy ; and in anno 1530 he got the pri- ory of Beaulieu in commendam ; and in 1540 was made bishop of Orkney, as says Joannes Ferrarius Pedemonta- nus, in his account of the abbots of Kinloss. Bishop Reid was a man of great learning, and a most accomplished poli- tician. This, no doubt, has been the reason of sending him one of the commissioners from Scotland into France, to witness the marriage of our young Queen Mary with the dauphin, anno 1558 ; but in his return he died at Dieppe the 14th day of September that year. He bequeathed by his testament the sum of 8000 merks, Scots money, towards founding a college in Edinburgh for the education of youth. [Maitland's History of Edinbtirgh, p. 355, &c.] so that this being the first sum mortified for that purpose, he may be justly reckoned the first founder of that university. He has probably been admitted bishop of this see upon King James V^s recommendation of him to the Pope, anno 1541, [Epist. Reg: Scot., p. 114,] by which it likewise appears that he had been a minister of state full 12 years before that time, and that he was then abbot of Kinloss. He was bishop here anno 1543, [Ep, Reg. Scot. Vol. II. p. 182.] He was bishop anno 1546, [Reg: P. C.] and anno 1556, [KeitKs Histlip. 71.] Bishop Reid was president of the Court of Session anno 1554 ; also an ordinary judge in that court anno 1554. [Notes in the Adv. Libr.] Robert bishop of Orkney was also sometime vicar-ge- neral of the see of Aberdeen, by commission from William, the proper bishop thereof, who was beyond sea, and in the city of Paris in France, 13th September anno 1552. One of the witnesses subscribing his commission is " Reverendo Domino Jacobo Stewart priore Sactandr.," which (by the by) is the single place where I have chanced to see this person (afterward Earl of Moray) so subscribing. [Invent. Aberdeen, and vid. See of Aberdeen] This prelate erected a stately tower on the north end of the bishop's palace, where his statue is engraved on the THE SEE OF ORKNEY. 225 wall, to be seen to this day. He likeways enlarged and beautified the cathedral, and adorned the entry to it with a magnificent porch. He built also a large court for a college for instructing the youth in grammar and philosophy. Moreover, he made a new foundation of the chapter, en- larging the number of canons, and settling ample provisions for their maintenance. In a book dedicated to him by one Adam Elder, a monk of Kinloss, it is stated that he had a right to the monasteries of Beaulieu and Kinloss, which last he furnished with an excellent library. He was in great credit with King James V., by whom he was consulted in all weighty affairs. The same Adam Elder gives the follow- ing remarkable epigram concerning this bishop, viz. " Quid tentem angusto perstringere carmine laudes, Quas nulla eloquii vis celebrare queat ? Clarus es eloquio, coelo dignissime praesul, Antiqua generis nobilitate viges : Commissumque gregem pascis, relevasque jacentem, Exemplo ducens ad meliora tuo. Ac velut exoriens terris sol discutit umbras, Illustras radiis pectora caeca tuis. Hortaris tardos, objurgas, corripis omnes, In mala praecipites quos vetus error agit. Pauperibus tua tecta patent, tua prompta voluntas, Atque boiiis semper dextera larga tua est. Nemo lupos melius sacris ob ovilibus arcet, Ne Christi lanient diripiantve gregem. Ergo pia ob studia, et magna, durosque labores Ille DEUS pacis, det tibi pace frui. Concedatque tuis succedant omnia votis, Et bona successus adjuvet aura tuos." The History of the Family of Sutherland says, that this bishop left a great sum of money for building the college of Edinburgh, which the Earl of Morton converted to his own 226 THE SEE OF ORKNEY. use and profit, by banishing the executors of Bishop Reid for supposed crimes, [^ug: Hay, Johnston.] This bishop's writings are, Imo, A Geographical descrip- tion of the Isles of Orkney ; 2do, A Genealogical and His- torical Account of the Family of the Sinclairs. Both these were wrote at the desire of the King of Denmark ; and Dr Mackenzie says, that they are still extant in manu- script. REFORMATION. I.ADAM BOTHWELL, 1562.] Adam Bothwell, son to Mr Francis Bothwell, one of the senators of the College of Justice anno 1532, by Janet Richardson his wife, daugh- ter and one of two co-heiresses of Patrick Richardson of Meldrumsheugh, burgess of Edinburgh, was preferred to the see of Orkney by Queen Mary, on the 8th day of Octo- ber anno 1562, after he had been duly elected by the chap- ter, \Cliart. Publ.] He was one of the four bishops who embraced the new Reformation ; but it doth not appear, from the history of that time, that he exercised any eccle- siastical jurisdiction. He was the person that performed the ceremony of marrying the queen to the Earl of Bothwell ; and notwithstanding his having a hand in that affair, he was one of those who persecuted her Majesty afterward with the utmost virulence. He was, for a long space after, a judge in the Session, having been nominated to that seat two years after his presentation to the bishopric ; and as he had in his own person the property of the bishopric of Orkney, he excambed the far greater part of it with the ab- bot of Holyroodhouse, Robert Stewart, the queen's natural THE SEE OF ORKNEY. 227 brother, for his abbey ; after which excambion we find him designed bishop of Orkney and abbot of Holyroodhouse, at least commendator of that abbey. This excambion was made in the year 1570. He died on the 23d of August 1593, at the age of 72, and was interred in the abbey-church of Holyroodhouse. 2. JAMES LAW, 1606.] James Law, minister at Kirklis- ton, was in the year 1606 promoted to this see, where he sat till, in the year 1615, he was translated to the bishopric of Glasgow. 3. GEORGE GRAHAM, 1615.] George Graham, son of George Graham of Inchbraky, by Mary daughter of Mr Hollo of Duncrub, was minister at Scone, and then bishop of Dunblane, and from that translated to the see of Orkney anno 1615, where he continued till the year 1638. He was very rich, and being threatened by the Assembly at Glas- gow, he renounced his Episcopal function ; and, in a letter to that extravagant Assembly, he acknowledged the unlaw- fulness of his office, and declared his unfeigned sorrow and grief for his having exercised such a sinful office in the church. By this submission, being only deposed from his Episcopal function, he was not excommunicated by the As- sembly, as the far greater part of his brethren the bishops were ; and thereby he saved his estate of Gorthie and the money he had upon bond, which otherwise would all have fallen under escheat. 4. ROBERT BARON, .] Upon Bishop Graham's re- nunciation, Robert Baron, professor of divinity in the Maris- chall college in New Aberdeen, a man famous for his writings and other good qualifications, was elected to the see of Orkney ; but being forced, by the perversity of the times, to flee out of this kingdom, he died at Berwick, having never been consecrated. p2 228 THE SEE OF ORKNEY. 5. THOMAS SYDSERF, 1662.] Thomas Sydserf, who had been bishop of Galloway before the year 1638, rnd was the only surviving bishop at the Restoration, was immediately translated to the see of Orkney in the year 1662 ; but he died the next year, 1663. See the Bishops of Galloway. 6. ANDREW HONYMAN, 1664.] Andrew Ilonyman, archdeacon of St. Andrews, author of the Seasonable Case and Survey of Naphtali, succeeded Bishop Sydserf, anno 1664, in this see. In the month of July 1668, this prelate received, on the street of Edinburgh, by one Mitchell, who had been at the rising into rebellion at Pentland hills, a shot into his arm with a poisoned bullet, as he was step- ping into the archbishop of St. Andrews Dr. Sharp^s coach, for whom the shot was intended. He found his health much impaired after this disaster; and he died in February 1676, with great peace and composure, contrary to what has been asserted by some pamphlet writers, as can be at- tested by several gentlemen who were witnesses to his death. He was buried in the cathedral church at Kirkwall. 7. MURDOCH MACKENZIE, 1677.] Mr Murdoch Mac- kenzie, descended of the Mackenzies of Gairloch, an old ca- det of the family of Seaforth, was first minister of Contane in the shire of Ross, from whence he was transported to In- verness in anno 1640, and from thence to Elgin, 17th April 1645, where he continued until the Restoration of Episcopacy in anno 1662, when he was made bishop of Moray. From this he was translated to the see of Orkney in anno 1677, where he continued until his death, which happened in February 1688, being near an hundred years old, and yet enjoyed the perfect use of all his faculties until the very last. He married the only daughter of Donald Macley, bailie of the burgh of Fortrose, by whom he had several children, whose posterity still remains. THE SEE OF ORKNEY. 229 8. ANDREW BRUCE, 1688.] Andrew Bruce, son to Mr Bruce, commissary of St Andrews, came to be arch- deacon of St Andrews, [Clermont's Collections,'] and was afterwards promoted to the bishopric of Dunkeld, anno 1679, and there he continued till the year 1686. He was deprived by the Court for shewing his dislike to the de- sign of repealing the laws against Popery. Yet the king, perceiving the disagreeableness of such proceedings, did re- commend him to be elected to the see of Orkney upon the death of the preceding bishop. The king's Conge cTElire and recommendation do both bear date the 4th of May 1688, [/6z'd.] But the Revolution coming quickly to take place, he was deprived with the rest of his Order, and died in the month of March 1700. As all the province of the archiepiscopal see of St An- drews is now finished, I proceed next to the province of Glasgow, and its suffragans.* * For some notices relative to the see of Orkney, the reader is referred to the Appendix, Note P, 2SO THE SEE OF GLASGOW. SOME people are of opinion, that the Episcopal see of Glasgow was founded by St Kentigern in the year 560, [Rennet's Parochial Antiquities ;] but others are of another mind, holding this Kentigern, al. Mungo, to have been only a religious man, who had a cell there, and for whose sanc- tity posterity had such a veneration that they dedicated the cathedral church afterwards to his memory ; and he has still been, and is to this day, reckoned the tutelar saint (as men chuse to express it) of both the church and the city of Glasgow. It would appear that, about King David I.'s time, people did not take St Kentigern to have been a bi- shop, but rather a confessor and holy martyr ; for, in all the writs of the cartulary of Glasgow, he is never once styled bishop, but sometimes confessor. The donations are always *' Deo, et ecclesiae Sti Kentigerni," or " Deo, et Sancto Kentigerno ;" and he is there called " Patrono ecclesiae Glasguensis ;"" yet it is to be observed, that in the inqui- sition concerning the lands, &c. which had formerly per- tained to the see of Glasgow, performed by David earl of Cumberland, brother to King Alexander I. and afterward king himself of Scotland, by the ordinary appellation of St David, Kentigern is expressly titled a bishop ; but then, how far credit is to be given to this paper, I shall submit to other persons to form a judgment, after they have read over Sir James Dalrymple's scruples in his Collections, p. 337, &c. and have considered what may occur to them- selves ; yet there are authors to be found who are, at this day, pretty positive that St Kentigern, al. Mungo, was truly a bishop, and that also in the city of Glasgow. [Vid. Britannia Sancta.] THE SEE OF GLASGOW. 231 This Kentigern was born at or near the town of Culross, about anno Dom. 516, and died 13th January anno 601. [Ibid.'] BISHOPS OF GLASGOW. JOHN, 1115.] John, a person of good learning and great probity, and who had travelled both into France and Italy for his improvement, and had had the charge of the education of the forementioned David the king's brother, was, by the fa- vour of this Prince David, made bishop of this see, and conse- crated by the hand of Pope Paschal II. in the year 1115.* But the bishop meeting with much opposition in the exer- cise of his function, as probably might be expected in this new settlement, he threw up, or at least deserted, his office for a season, and made a journey into the Holy Land ; others say, only into France, where he remained until Pope Calixtus II. obliged him to return to his function in the year 1123, [Char. Melr.~\ When Earl David came to the crown, by the name of David I. or St David afterwards, he bestowed many donations both on the see and bishop of Glasgow, and likewise did put the bishop into the office of chancellor, [Cart. Dunferm.] But a secular employment not suiting, it seems, the temper of the good man, he re- signed that honourable office, and gave himself entirely to the duties of his ecclesiastic function. He rebuilt and adorned the cathedral church, and solemnly consecrated it Nonis Julii anno 1136, [Chron. Stae Crucis et Melros.~\ at which solemnity the king was present, and gave to this church the lands of Partick, [Cart. Glasg.'} and this prelate * This bishop is called Michael by Stubbs, in his Actus Pont. Ebor. apud Twysden. Col. 1713 : who also pretends to quote from a document composed in the hand-writing of that prelate. It is certain, however, that Stubbs if inaccurate in this particular. 232 THE SEE OF GLASGOW. divided the diocese into the two archdeaconries of Glasgow and Teviotdale, [Chron Metros.] and set up the offices of dean, subdean, chancellor, treasurer, sacrist, chantor, and succentor, and settled a prebend upon each of them out of the donatives he had received from the king. John is bishop here in the time of King David I. 1C hart. Glasg. it-. Diplom. et Numism. it. Cart. Dunferm.'] He is witness to a charter of St David's to the monastery of Newbottle, anno 1140, [August. Hay ;] and in a charter by Robert bi- shop of St Andrews, John, bishop here, is a co-witness with King David, his son Henry, and Matilda the queen, [Cart. Kels.1 He died the 28th May 1147,* [Chron. Melr. et Stae Crucis^\ and was buried at Jedburgh. Mr Dempster says, that he wrote two books, viz. " De Soli- tudinis Encomio, 11 and " De Amicitia Spirituali." HERBERT, 1147. ] Herbert, formerly abbot of Kelso, 1 and chancellor of the kingdom, was consecrated bishop here on St Bartholomew's day the same year, 1147, by Pope Eugenius III. Herbert, elect of Glasgow, is contemporary with Robert and Gregory bishops of St Andrews and Dunkeld, [Cart. Cambusk.] He is bishop in the time of King David, [Cart. Dunferm. it. Nicolson's Historical Library, it. Dipl. et Num. c. 23.] He is bishop in the time of Ernald bishop of St Andrews, and in the reign of King Malcolm, [Cart. Glasg. Dunferm. et Cambusk. ; also Cart. Kels. it. Dipl. et Numis. c. 25 ;] and he died bishop * The following authority gives a different date for the demise of this pre- late. " Defunctus est eodem anno (1148) Joannes Episcopus Glasguensis, " propter excellentiam virtutis Davidi regi Scotiae familiarissimus, sepul- " tusque est in ecclesia de Geddeswitch, in quaconventum clericorum regu- " larium ipse disposuit. Electus pro eo Herbertus abbas de Kelseio, vir et " ipse strenuus, consecratus est a Papa Eugenic, apud Antisidorum." John Hagustald. Col. 27fa'. 1 He was third abbot of Selkirk and first of Kelso, as is mentioned in the charter of translation of that abbacy from Selkirk to Kelso, by Earl David, who afterwards succeeded his brother Alexander I. in the kingdom of Scot- land, anno 1121 [Ch. Calcho.] THE SEE OF GLASGOW. in the year 1164, [Chr. Melr.] In his time sentence was given against Roger bishop of York, and the church of Scotland declared to be exempt from all jurisdiction except that of the see of Rome. INGELRAM, 1164] Ingelram, (called by some New- bigging,) brother to Elias laird of Dunsire in the shire of Lanark, was the next who filled this see, [Cart. Kelso;~\ but whether Newbigging was at that time the surname of the lands of Dunsire, is altogether uncer- tain. He had been rector of Peebles, and of conse- quence archdeacon of the church of Glasgow, [Reliquiae Sti Kentigerni.] While in this station he was made chan- cellor by King David, [Charter to the See of St Andrews, anno 1151,] and continued in the same office by King Malcolm. Roger archbishop of York having, in the year 1159, revived his claim of superiority over the church in Scotland, [Spottiswood, Collier, and Extract, e Chronic. Scot.] and called a provincial council to meet at Norham in Northumberland, thither did Ingelram the archdeacon re- pair ; and both there, and afterwards at Rome, defended so strenuously the cause of the Scottish church, that he was, immediately upon the death of Herbert, elected bishop of Glasgow, and consecrated by Pope Alexander III. on SS. Simon and Jude's day, the very same year his predecessor had died, [Chron. Melr.~] i. e. anno 1164. He was bishop in the time of King Malcolm, [Cart. Kels^\ and anno 11 70, [Cart. Glasg-.] He died on the 2d of February 1174, [Chron. Melr.] And Dempster tells us of three books written by him, viz. 1. " Epistolae ad diversos ;" 2. "In Evangelia Dominicalia ;"' 3. " Rationes Regni Administrandi." I reckon the curious will not be displeased that I set down here a copy of the Pope's bull, relating to his Holi- ness"^ decision of the controversy, and his consecrating of this bishop. I have taken it verbatim from the cartulary of Glasgow, 234 THE SEE OF GLASGOW. BULLA ALEXAXDRI, P. III. anno Dom. 1164. ex ChartuL Glasg. * ALEXANDER episcopus, servus servorum Dei, dilectis * filiis Salomoni decano, et canonicis Glasguen. et universe * clero ac populo per Glasguensem episcopatum constitutis, * salutem et Apostolicam Benedictionem. Venerabilem fra- ' trem nostrum Engel. olim electum, nunc vero episcopum ' vestrum, cum chariss. in Christo filii nostri M. illustris ' Scotorum Regis, et vestris aliorumque literis ad nos veni- ' entem, debita benignitate suscepimus, et, sicut nos et ip- * sum decuit, honorare curavimus : licet autem nuncii vene- * rabilis fratris nostri Eboracensis Archiepiscopi, qui prae- * sentes extiterant, repugnarent, et apud nos precibus mul- ' tis institerent, ne in hoc facto procederemus : nos tamen * attendentes illam necessitatem, quae Glasguensi ecclesiae, 4 per defectum pastoris, spiritualiter et temporaliter immi- * nebat ; non propterea dimisimus, quin eidem regi, tan- * quam Christianissimo principi volentes deferre, et eidem ' ecclesiae vestrae utiliter providere, de communi fratrum ' nostrorum concilio, eum, sicut debuimus, in episcopum * consecremus; Ipsum itaque de nostris, tanquam de Beati * Petri manibus consecratum, cum plenitudine gratiae et * benedictione Apostolicae sedis ad vos, tanquam ad spiri- * tuales filios, remittentes, eum universitati vestrae attentius * commendamus per Apostolica scripta ; rogantes, monen- 4 tes atque mandantes, quatenus pro reverentia Beati Petri, 6 ac nostra, ipsum, velut episcopum et pastorem vestrum, ' benigne recipiatis, et ei, sicut spiritual! patri et rectori f animarum vestrarum, debitam in omnibus obedientiam ac * reverentiam impendatis. Si quis autem vestrum huic 4 mandate nostro contumaciter duxerit resistendum, nos * sententiam, quam idem episcopus in eum propter hoc ' canonice tulerit, auctore Domino, ratam et firmam habe- * bimus. 1 Datum Senonib. Kal. Novembris. THE SEE OF GLASGOW. 235 JOCELIXE, 1175.] Joceline, abbot of Melrose, was elect- ed the same year that Ingelram died, viz, anno 1174, and was consecrated by Eskilus archbishop of Lunden in Den- mark, the Pope's legate for that kingdom, on the 1st day of June 1175, in Charavalle, [Chron. Melr.~] He would ap- pear to have been archdeacon of Dunkeld before he came to be abbot of Melrose ; at least, one Joceline archdeacon there is witness to " Hugo Dei gratia humilis minister Sti An- dreae," [Cart, Cambusk.] But when I see Joceline arch- deacon of Dunkeld a Avitness to King William, and in the same writ Joceline bishop of Glasgow set down as the first witness, [Cart. Mor.~] I easily conclude they must have been two different persons. That Bishop Joceline was the immediate successor of Ingelram, is evident from a bull of the Pope Alexander III. " Venerabili fratri Jocelino Glasguensi episcopo, ej usque successoribus. Dat Ferentin. 2Kal. Maii, Incarnationis Dominicae, anno 1174. Pontificatus Domini Alexandri Papae III. anno ejus 16." [Cart. Glasg.'] And King William grants a charter ap- pointing tithes to be paid to Joceline, ' sicut unquam me- lius aut plenius Joanni et Herberto, aut Engelramo, episco- pis ante eum solvere solebatis. 1 [Ibid.] This bishop is said to have enlarged the cathedral of Glasgow, and to have rebuilt it in the same state it continues to be at this day, and dedicated it " pridie Nonas Julii anno 1197,"" in the 24th year of his episcopate, [Chron. Melr. ;] and the same chartulary takes notice, that he gave to the monks of that place the church of Hastendan in pure and perpetual alms. Joceline is bi- shop of Glasgow in the time of King William, [Cart. Dun- ferm.~\ in the fifth year of his reign, [Cart. Aberdon.] He is contemporary with Richard bishop of Moray, [Errol,] and with Hugo and Roger bishops of St Andrews, [Cart. Aberbr.~\ J. is bishop anno 1177, [Cart. Kels.] and Joce- line anno 1179, [Cart. Arbr.~\ and anno 1181, [Melros.] In the cartulary of Paisley, Bishop Joceline is a frequent witness; and he gives or confirms to that monastery several 236 THE SEE OF GLASGOW. churches, such as Mernis, Katkert, Ruglen, &c. He died at Melrose, in the year 1199. [Chron. MelrJ} HUGO DE ROXBURGH, 1199.] After Bishop Joceline, one Hew, or Hugo de Roxburgh, descended of a good fa- mily of that surname, was promoted to this see. He was rector of Tullibody in vicec. de Clackmannan, and clerk to Nicolaus the chancellor of Scotland, who died anno 1171, [Chart. Cambuskennetk, fol. r. 163.] He was afterwards one of the clerici regis, [Dalrymple, p. 272,] and arch- deacon of St Andrews. In the year 1189 he was made chancellor, and preferred to this see ten years thereafter. But before he had sat therein one full year, death took him away, " sexto Idus Julii 1199," [C. Melr.] " Hugo can- cellarius Scotise successit Joceline episcopo Glasguensi, et cito moritur. 1 " [For dun.] WILLIAM MALVOISIN, 1200.] William Malvicine, al. Malvoisine, (called in the charters de Malovicino,) chancellor of the kingdom, was consecrated bishop of this see in the year 1200, [Chron. Melr.] but others say 1199. Both accounts may be true, through the different computation of the beginning of the year. He was bishop here anno 1200. See the Bishops of St Andrews, to which place he was soon translated. FLOKENTIUS, Ekct, 1202.] Florentius, a son of the Earl of Holland, and, by the mother, a relation of the king of Scotland, had applied himself to the service of the church, and was preferred by our King William to be lord chan- cellor of this kingdom in the year 1208, [Chron. Aberbr.] and, upon Bishop Malvicine's translation to the see of St Andrews, he was elected bishop of Glasgow. Immediately thereafter he, upon " consilium et assensum capituli Glas- guensis et cleri dioceseos,"" confirmed " Clero et ecclesiae Stae Marise de Melros, ecclesiam de Hastenplan ;"" and, THE SEE OF GLASGOW. 237 moreover, obliges himself that he shall ratify and confirm it de novo as soon as he shall be consecrated, [Cart. Melr.~] But whatever impediment might have delayed his conse- cration, it is certain that, while he was only elect of this see, in the year 1202, he, with the Pope's allowance, resigned his Episcopal function, and some space thereafter went to Rome, where he ended his days, [Ibid.] In a bull of confir- mation to the abbey of Paisley by Pope Innocent III. of the churches of Turnberry, Craigin, and Dalziel, mention is made of " Florentius electus Glasg."" and " Florentius Dei gratia Glasguensis electus, Domini regis cancellarius, omnibus hominibus, amicis suis," [Cart. Glasg.] but has no date ; and so it only serves to ascertain, that one Flo- rentius was really bishop elect of Glasgow. WALTER, 1208.] Walter, chaplain to King William, was elected into this see anno 1207, the same year in which the former elect had died, and was consecrated at Glasgow the 2d of November 1208, [Melr.~\ It appears by the char- tulary of Glasgow, that Walter succeeded to Florence, and that Florence had never been consecrated, [vid. Charia Willielmif. Galfridi Domini de Orde de terra de Stop- hopeJ] This bishop was sent to treat about peace with John King of England, and went to a General Council at Rome in the year 1215, together with Brice bishop of Mo- ray, and Adam bishop of Caithness, and returned the third year after, [Melr .] He was bishop here anno 1212, [C. Dunferm."} as he seems to have been in the third year of Pope Honorius, i. e. anno 1218, and was anno 1220, [C. Paslet.] He is witness to a charter of Walter second steward of Scotland, granting to the monks of Paisley free liberty to elect a prior and abbot to themselves, about the year 1219 or 1220, [Hay.] He was bishop anno 1225, and in the 12th year of King Alexander II. [Cart. Glasg. et Mor.~\ also anno 1227, [Melr.~\ He was contemporary with Wil- liam Malvicine bishop of St Andrews, [Ibid, et C. Pas!.] THE SEE OF GLASGOW. He was still bishop anno 1232, [Kelso,'] and died in that year, [Chron. Melros.~\ WILLIAM DE BOXDIXGTON, 1233.] William de Bon- dington, of an ancient family in the shire of Berwick. He was rector of Edelstone, a prebendary of Glasgow, one of the clericl cancellarii, and afterwards archdeacon of St An- drews, within the bounds of Lothian, and a privy-counsel- lor to King Alexander II. who advanced him in the year 1231 to the chancellor's office. The next year he was elected bishop of Glasgow, and consecrated in the cathedral church by Anduew bishop of Moray, " Dominica post nativitatem beatae Marise, anno Dom. 1233," [Melros.] William de Bondington, chancellor, (but without the de- signation of bishop) is witness, after " G. episcop. Aber- donen." to a charter by King Alexander II. at Aberdeen, 9th October, in the 18th year of his reign. William the chancellor is elect of Glasgow in the 19th year of King Alexander, [JTefo.] and he is bishop here the 3d of July in the same 19th year of King Alexander II. i. e. anno Dom. 1233, [Aberbr.~\ He is bishop here and chancellor in the 20th year of King Alexander, [C. Balmer,~\ and in the 21st year of the said king [C. Mor.~\ He was bishop about the year 1235, [Durham MSS.~\ He is bishop here anno 1239, [Account of Religious Houses^ p. 477 and 496 ; it. Cart. Cambusk.} He grants and confirms several churches to the abbey of Paisley anno 1239, \_Paisl.~\ In the year 1240, Pope Gregory IX. having called a General Council, upon pretext of relief to the Holy Land, and the Emperor Frederick II. who was on ill terms with the Pope, appre- hending the design to be against himself, caused stop several prelates, and Bishop Bondingtcn among the rest, in their way through Germany towards Rome, and dismissed them only upon promise not to proceed in their journey. Itwouldappear that he continued in the chancellor's office till the death of King Alexander II. We find him bishop anno 1244, and THE SEE OF GLASGOW. 239 in the first year of King Alexander III. i. e. anno Dom. 1249, \Cart. Pasl.] in the year 1235, 1245, 1250, and 1251, \Kdso;~\ in 1254, [Rymer ,-] in 1256, [Glag. etCam- busk.] in 1257, [Melros.] He was contemporary with Al- lan bishop of Argyle. This bishop finished the cathedral of Glasgow out of his own liberality, [Hect. Boeth. Hist.} He wrote " De Translatione Dom. Margaretae Reginae, et Regis Malcolmi ejus mariti," [Dempst.] In the last year of his life he introduced into his diocese the use of the liturgical form of the church of Sarum, or Salisbury, in England, a copy of which rescript is here subjoined : * Omnibus Christi fidelibus, praesens scriptum visuris vel * audituris, Willielmus, miseratione Divina Ecclesiae Glas- * cuensis minister, salutem in Domino. Officii nostri debi- * turn remediis invigilat subditorum, inter quos Ecclesiae * nostrae cathedralis ministros prosequimur favore spiritual!, ' cui spiritual! conjugio copulamur, et cujus rninistri nobis, * tanquam membra capiti, indissolubili caritate cohaerent. ' Attendentes igitur ecclesiam Sarisburiensem, inter ceteras * Ecclesias Cathedrales, libertatibus et consuetudinibus ap- * probatis ornatam, eisdem canonicis nostris, libertates et ' consuetudines dicta? Ecclesiae Sarisburiensis, de consensu * capituli donamus, et concedimus, statuentes de consensu * ejusdem capituli, ut libertates et consuetudines praenomi- ( natae Ecclesiae in Ecclesia Glascuensi in perpetuum ob- * serventur. Datum apud Alencrumb, die Sancti Leonardi, * anno Gratiae millesimo ducentesimo quinquagesimo octa- ' vo.' And some say it was only in his time that this see was divided into the two archdeaconries of Glasgow and Teviotdale. He died November 10. 1283, and on the 13th was interred in the abbey-church of Melrose, near the high altar, [Chron. Metros.} Others say he died anno 1257.* * 1258. Scotichronicon, V. II. p. 92. The date in the text is obviously a mistake. 240 THE SEE OF GLASGOW. JOHN DE CHEYAM, 1260.] John de Cheyam, al. Che- am,* who seems to derive his name from the village of Cheam in the county of Surry, an Englishman, and arch- deacon of Bath, chaplain to Pope Alexander IV. was by that Pope consecrated the next bishop of this see in the year 1260, through the plenitude of his apostolic power, as he himself relates, after he had cassed and annulled the postulation which had passed in favours of Nicholas Moffat, archdeacon of Teviotdale, to be consecrated bishop here, \Eymer :] The occasion of which conduct of the Pope is said to have been this : Mr Moffat having gone to Rome for consecration, the Pope, upon his refusing to advance him money, and by the intrigues of Robert elect of Dun- blane, who hoped to get into this see of Glasgow, would not consecrate him, but promoted John de Cheyam to the see. The Pope, it seems, was sensible how disagreeable this step would prove to our king, and therefore took care to solicit the king of England to employ his interest witli the king of Scotland (for he was father-in-law to our king) that he might graciously receive Cheyam, and grant his temporalities to be punctually paid to him. It seems also that our king was not at all satisfied, for upon CheyanVs coming into this kingdom, he became very disagreeable both to the king and to his own clergy ; so that he made choice to live in foreign parts, and at the court of Rome, and at last died in France in the year 1268, [Melros.'] J. is bishop 1264, [Kelso,] and John is so anno 1266, \Glasg.~\ NICOL DE MOFFAT, Elect, 1268.] Nicholaus de Moffat, archdeacon of Teviotdale, above-mentioned, was again elected bishop immediately upon the death of Bishop Cheyam, in anno 1268, " Electus est," [says Fordun, Vol. II. p. 109.] " Magister Nicholaus de Moffat archidiaconus * It is CHICHAM according to a papal bull to be found in Ayloffe, p. 339 ; and CIIIHAM in the same document as printed by Rymer, Vol. I. p. 216. THE SEE OF GLASGOW. 241 ' Tevidaliae, qui etiam ante dictum Joannem electus fuit in ' episcopum, sed fraude canonicorum suorum,ut praescripsi- ( mus, cassatus, vir sanctae vitae et dapsilitatis.' He conti- nued elect of this see above two years, and died anno 1270, without ever being consecrated, which was owing to the strong opposition made against him by his own canons, spi- rited up by others of the clergy. Anno MCCLXX. Magister 4 Nicholaus de Moffat mortuus est, qui se nimis proterve ' contra religiosos et alias ecclesiasticas personas gerebat : ' cui, ad regis instantiam, Magister Willielmus Wischard, ( archidiaconus Sancti Andreae, et Domini regis cancella- * rius, electus est; vir magnae sagacitatis et astutiae."* [Fordun, Vol. II. p. 112.] He died, according to Mr Hay's MS. of an apoplexy, at Tinningham in East-Lothian. [Macf] WILLIAM WISEHEART, Elect, 1270.] William Wise- heart, archdeacon of St Andrews, and lord high chancellor, was elected into this see in the year 1270, after the death of Bishop Moffat, but before his consecration. He was likewise elected into the see of St Andrews, then vacant by the death of Bishop Gameline, [Chron. Melros.] For more of Bishop Wishart, see the Bishops of St Andrews. ROBERT WISEHEART, 1272. ] " Robert Wiseheart, archidiaconus Sti Andreae, infra partes Laudoniae," and nephew or cousin to the preceding William Wiseheart, was next elected and consecrated bishop of this see, [C. Melr.~\ at Aberdeen, by the bishops of Aberdeen, Moray, and Dun- blane. R. was bishop anno 1273, [Cart. Glasg. et Kelso^} anno 1275, 1293, and 1296, also 1316, {Cart. Glasg.] anno 1276, 1293, and 1305, [C. Paslet.] Robert is bishop, and in the 30th year of King Alexander III. \C. Dun- ferm.~\ he is witness to a charter by the Lord High-steward of Scotland anno 1294, [Hay.~\ He swears fealty to King Edward I. of England anno 1296. He is bishop 1309, 242 THE SEE OF OLASGOW. [Errol,~\ and anno 1315, \_Kelso.~] This worthy patriot was appointed one of the lords of the regency upon the death of King Alexander III. anno 1286, which office he discharged with great reputation and integrity. When the war broke out by reason of the encroachments King Ed- ward I. of England made upon the honour and indepen- dency of Scotland, no man did more vigorously withstand the tyranny than this prelate ; for which freedom he was thrown into prison by King Edward, and that king wrote to the Pope to have him deprived of his bishopric, in re- gard the bishop, says the king, was his great enemy : and had it not been out of fear of the Pope, it is not to be doubted that the bishop, being the king's prisoner, [Rymers Fcedera,] would have been put to death, as were many of the Scottish nobility. After the battle of Bannockburn lie was exchanged for another person of quality, anno 1314, [Ibid.'] This excellent prelate having had the happiness to see King Robert Bruce fully seated on the throne, to which he had not a little contributed, died in the month of No- vember in the year 1316. STEPHEN DE DUKDEMORE, Elect, 1317.] ; Stephen de Dundemore, descended of the Dundemores, or Dunmofres, of that Ilk, an ancient family in vicecom. de Fife. He is by some, but erroneously, called Dundee. He was chancellor of this church, of which he was elected bishop anno 1317, [Rymer ,-] but being an enemy to the English interest, King Edward II. of that nation wrote to the Pope that he would not admit Stephanum de Dundemor, who was elect of this church, to the bishopric, [Ibid.] and indeed it would ap- pear he never was consecrated, having died, they say, on his way to Rome ; and the above-mentioned authority avers, that King Edward of England, during the vacancy of this see, conferred presentations to the prebends of this church. In a charter by King Robert Bruce in favour of Robert bishop of Glasgow, Stephen de Donydon, canon of THE SEE OF GLASGOW. 243 Glasgow, and " camerario nostro," is one of the witnesses. [C. Glasg.} 8 * This see is said to have been vacant in the month of Fe- bruary 1313, [C. Paslet.} It was also vacant at Christmas 1321, [C. Arbr.~\ and yet it is said, JOHN WISEHEART came into this see in the year 1319, [_Rymer.~] He had been formerly archdeacon of this same church. He is bishop here 16th December, the 19th year of King Robert I. [C. Aberbr.] anno 1325, [C. Glasg.} and John was bishop here in the 20th year of King Robert Bruce, [Scone.] This prelate was also an enemy to the Eng- lish interest in this country ; and so there is an order by King Edward, after he had fallen into that king's hands, while he was yet archdeacon, to convey this John Wise- heart, " quondam archidiaconum Glasguen." then a prisoner in the castle of Conway, to the city of Chester, and from thence to the Tower of London, 6th April 1310, \Rymer. ~\ It is very probable he was released after the battle of Bannockburn, when Bishop Robert Wiseheart and others were exchanged for English prisoners in the year 1322. * Johannes Dei gratia episcopus Glasguen. cum unanimi * consensu et assensu capituli sui,' gives ' ecclesiae Sanctae ' Cruets de Edinburgh, et canonicis ibidem Deo servienti- * bus, ecclesiam de Dalgarnock, nostrae dicces."" dat. 21st March 1322 : And the same grant is confirmed by Pope John XXII. \Cartul. Glasg.} This prelate died anno 1325. JOHN LINDSAY, 1325.] John Lindsay, of the illustrious family of the Lindsays, was the following bishop of this 2 Yet the author of the Officers of State has not this person in his list of the King's chamberlains. * Edward II. calli him De Donydor. Focfera, Vol. III. p. 654. Q2 244 THE SEE OF GLASGOW. sze, and he was certainly in the see in the year 1326-7, as ap- pears by a charter of King Robert I. to the monks of Melrose, dated March 22. the 20th year of the king, in which char- ter he is expressly designed " John Lindsay, episcopus Glas- guen. 11 John (but whether this or his predecessor is uncertain) was bishop of Glasgow in the year 1325, [C. Glasg.] and in the 20th of King Robert Bruce, [Scone, ut supra.'] This John Lindsay was bishop here the 20th day of March in the 22d year of King Robert I. {Cart. Aberd.] He was likewise bishop anno 1329, \Kelso et Newbot.~\ and in the time of King Edward Baliol, [C. Glasg.~\ When that prince set himself up to be king, this bishop entered into his measures ; and he, together with the bishops of Aber- deen and Dunkeld, are witnesses in a grant of King Ed- ward Baliol to Edward king of England, of the date the 12th February 1334, [Foed. AngJ\ This prelate, in anno 1335, returning from Flanders to Scotland 3 with two ships, aboard which were 250 Scots, was attacked at sea by a su- perior fleet of English, commanded by the Earls of Sarum and Huntingdon, Sec. The Scots vessels, being overpowered by numbers, were taken, after an obstinate fight, in which many of both sides were killed ; and the bishop, being mor- tally wounded in the head, immediately expired. WILLIAM RAE, 1335.] William, whose surname, ac- cording to the document published by the Scots College at 3 " Duas naves de Flandria versus Scotiam navigantes mul- " titudine Scotorum oneratas, sciz. 250. capiunt. Reperti enim suiit ibidem " episcopus Glasguensis, Joannes de Steward, et alii filii nobilium de Scotia, " videlicet, David de la Hay, Hugo Giffard, Joannes de la Mor, Willielmus " Baly, Alexander Frissell, cum duobus clericis magistro Thoma iTigas." [Probably Mr Thomas Fingask, who was made bishop of Caithness in 1348.] " Magistro Willielmo Muffet, et uno monacho de Dunfermline, cum mulie- " ribus qaibusdam nobilibus, quibus fere omnibus interfectis, episcopus obiit " lethaliterincapitevulneratus." [Thomas Walsingham, Historia Angliac, p. 118. ad annum 1555.] Macfarlane. THE SEE OF GLASGOW. 245 Paris, was Rae, and who is called William fourth, came, it is thought, into this see anno 1335 or 1336, 4 and died 1367. From several records, it is evident that he suc- ceeded to John Lindsay, whom he particularly designs his predecessor, \Cartul. Paisley ;] and by the same records he is found to be invested in the see, anno 1335. There is * Confirmatio Willielmi episcopi Glasgu. cantoriae unius sa- 4 cerdotis, tempore Joannis de Lindsay, episcopi Glasguen. * praedecessoris sui fundatae, &c. 10. die mensis Maii 1358.' \Kelso, fol. 211.] There are several original writs in this bishop^ name lying among the archives of the see of Glas- gow preserved in the Scots College, and in the monastery of Carthusians, in Paris, particularly two authentic acquit- tances for the contribution of the diocese of Glasgow to the Pope, in the years 1340 and 1341. He is witness to King David II. anno regis 14. [R. Charters^ and anno regis 15. [C. Aberbr.~\ William is bishop anno 1342 and anno 1362, \C. Glasg.~] yet Walter is named bishop here anno 1357, [Foed. Ang. Vol. VI. p. 633.] It was by order of this bishop, as being the Pope^s delegate, that Robert, Lord High-steward of Scotland, and Earl of Strathern, (after- wards king of Scotland by the name of Robert II.) did erect and endow a chaplainry in his church of Glasgow, upon account of a dispensation by the apostolic see for con- tracting of marriage betwixt the said Lord High-steward and Elizabeth More, al. Mure, notwithstanding the impe- diment of consanguinity and affinity between them. The instrument bears date January 12. 1364, [Vid. Pere Or- lean's Hist.] This bishop is said to have built the stone bridge of Glasgow over the river Clyde. 4 The difference may arise from the different computa tioni of the year, the Scots not commencing the year at that time until the 25th of March ; and this is to be observed in all our computations. This way of reckoning we only left off in the beginning of the year 1600, and took then, the 1st of Ja- nuary for the beginning of the year. 246 THE SEE OF GLASGOW. WALTER WARDL AW, 1368. ] Walter Wardlaw, of the fa- mily of Tone in Fife, archdeacon of Lothian, and secretary to King David IT. was consecrated bishop of this see in the year 1368, \Rymer ;] yet he is bishop here in the 38th year of King David II. [Cart. Cambusk.] i. e. anno Domini 1367 ; but the time of the year, both of his consecration and of the beginning of the king's reign, may adjust this matter. He was bishop here 4th July anno David II. 39- and 19th April anno Rob. II. primo, [J/ar.] He was bi- shop here in the Parliament at Scone 27th March 1371, [Ruddiman against Logan., p. 398.] He was promoted to be a cardinal by Pope Clement the VII. anno 1381, [For- dun.'] We find him bishop here in the 6th year of the said Pope, i. e. anno Domini 1384, [C. Paslet.~\ In the cartu- lary of Dunfermline, fol. 66, the following paper is to be seen, viz. ' Valterus miseratione divina sanctae Rom. eccle- * siae cardinalis, omnimodo potestate legati a latere in Sco- * tiae et Hiberniae regnis sufficienter fulcitus, sub sigillo * quo dudum utebamur ut episcopus Glasguen. 15to die ' mensis Decembris, Pontificatus Clementis Papae septimi ' anno octavo.' He was bishop and cardinal anno 10. Rob. II. [Royal Charters,] and January 2. anno Rob. II. 16. [J/ar.] Fordun says he died anno 1387 ; yet we find him (Walter,) still alive on the 10th of April, in the 19th year of King Robert II. i. e. anno 1389. [Dipl. et Num. c. 27.]* MATTHEW GLENDONIXG, 1389-] Matthew Glendo- ning, a younger son of Glendoning of that Ilk in Eskdale, whose successors are now designed Glendonings of Partoun in the stewartry of Kirkcudbright, was first one of the ca- nons of Glasgow, and succeeded into the see immediately * Bishop Wardlaw and the Bishop of Dunkeld were plenipotentiaries for negociating a truce with England at Bouloigne sur mer, i(i September 158*. [Foedera, Vol. VII. pp. 138, 441. And Rot. Scot. 10. Oct. 8. Itic. ii.] THE SEE OF GLASGOW. 247 upon the death of Bishop Wardlaw ; for we find him bishop here in the 19th year of King Robert II. [DipL et Numis.] He was bishop in the 20th year of King Robert II., and in the first year of King Robert III. {Royal CJvart.~\ the fourth year of King Robert III. [Clackmannan,] the sixth year of King Robert III. [Mar.] Matthew is bishop anno 1395 and 1403, [C. Glasg.] anno 1401, [ Msbef s Heraldry, Vol. II. App. p. 95.] anno Bob. III. 6* Christ. 1396, 1398, and 1408, [Pallet.'] He died in the year 1408. In his time, the great steeple of the church, which had been only built of timber, was burnt by lightning, in place whereof he intended to have built one of stone, for which he had made good preparation, but was prevented by death. WILLIAM LAUDER, 1408.] William Lauder, son to Sir Allan Lauder of Haltoun, (vnlgo. Hatton,) in the shire of Mid-Lothian, was first archdeacon of Lothian. In the year 1405, there is a safe-conduct from the king of Eng- land, ' Magistro Gulielmo Lauder archdiacono Laudoniae, ' veniendo in regnum Angliae, penes praesentiam regis pro * quibusdam negotiis expediendis. 1 [Rymer.~] When the see of Glasgow became vacant, anno 1408, he was preferred merely by the provision of Pope Benedict XIII., who set up for Pope at Avignon, in opposition to Gregory XII. at Rome, \Fordun, and the Life of Archbishop Chichele of Canterbury ,] and not by the election of the chapter. He was bishop here in the year 1411, [Reg. Chart.~] He was was bishop 1417, [C. Glasg.~\ Murdo duke of Albany, regent of the kingdom, made him lord chancellor anno 1423, in the room of the bishop of Aberdeen ; and the same year, the 9th of August, he was nominated first commis- sioner 5 for treating about the redemption of King James I. 5 The industrious writer of the Lives of the Officers of State, very justly chastises Hector Boece and our other historians, who set down the names of the other Lords Commissioners, and put a speech into the mouth of one of THE SEE OF GLASGOW. winch was at last effectuated the next year, 1424. Ac- cordingly, he is bishop and chancellor anno 1423, [Dipl. c. 65.] and 1424, [C. Glasg] and he continued in that office until his death ; for he was bishop here and lord chancellor the 14th day of April, in the 20th year of King James I. [C. Abcrd.] and William de Lauder, bishop, was dead, and the see vacant, May 19- anno 1426, [Cart. Glasg.] This bishop laid the foundation of the vestry of the cathe- dral church, and built the great steeple of stone, as far as the first battlement, where the arms of Lauder of Hatton are still to be seen cut in stone in several places. Bishop Lauder died June 14. 1425. [Obituary of Glasgow.] JOHN CAMERON, 1426.] John Cameron, of the family of Lochiel, was first official of Lothian in the year 1422, [C. Publ] He became afterwards confessor and secretary to the Earl of Douglas, who presented him to the rectory of Cambuslang, [Ibid.] He was provost of Lincluden 1424, and " Magistro Joanne Cameron" is " secretario " regis" the same year 1424, [R. Char. B. II. No. 5.] He is keeper of the great seal 25th February and 7th March 1425, [Ibid.] and anno 1425-6, [Ibid. B. II. No. 22.] February 25. and 15th May, an. reg. 20. he is provost of Lincluden, and keeper of the privy-seal, [Ibid.] and he is the same anno 1436, [Ibid. B. II. No. 8.] He is also provost of Lincluden and secretary anno 21. Jacobi I. [Ibid.] In the year 1426 he was elected bishop of Glasgow, [Relig. Sti Kentig.] and John Cameron is ^ electo et confirmato episcopo Glasguensi, et priv. sigilli custode," anno 1426, [Reg. Chart.] He is also bishop of this see, and lord chancellor, the 24th year of King James I., and anno 1428, and anno 1430, [Ibid.] In the year 1429, this bi- them ; although it be evident by the commission, as now published in the Foed. Ang. that not so much as one single person of their nomination was really in the commission. Strange management of our historians truly! THE SEE OF GLASGOW. 249 shop erected six churches within his diocese, by consent of their respective patrons, into prebends, the title of which erection, as contained in the Chart. Glasg. is thus : ' E- * rectio sex ecclesiarum parochialium in praebendas eccle- ' siae Glasg. facta per Joannem Cameron episcopum Glas- * guensem :' And the six churches were, Cambuslang, Torbolton, Eglisham, Luss, Kirkmaho, and Killearn. And this bishop also fixed particular offices to particular churches, such as, the rector of Cambuslang to be perpetual chan- cellor of the church of Glasgow, the rector of Carnwath to be treasurer, the rector of Kilbride to be chantor, &c. In the year 1433, Bishop Cameron was chosen one of the de- legates from the church of Scotland to the council of Basil; and accordingly he set out, with a safe-conduct from the king of England, with a retinue of no less than thirty per- sons, [Officers of State, p. 25. item, Foed. Ang.~\ And as the truce with England was near to a close on the 30th November 1437, Mr Rymer has published another safe- conduct for ambassadors from Scotland to come into Eng- land about prorogation of the peace ; and the first of these named is John bishop of Glasgow, chancellor of Scot- land, [R. Chart. B. II. No. 8.] He was bishop here anno 1439, [Peerage, p. 278 ;] anno 1440, [Mar ;] anno 1444, [R. Chart.~\ and bishop and chancellor anno 3^ regis Ja- cobi II. [Ibid.] So it is evident, from the clearest vouch- ers, that this person remained chancellor for the first three years of the reign of King James II., contrary to what all our historians have written, which affords a strong pre- sumption that the story concerning his tragical end is a mere fiction. After the bishop's removal from the chan- cellor's office, and so being freed from public business, he began to build the great tower at his Episcopal palace in the city of Glasgow, where his coat-armorial is to be seen to this day, with mitre, crosier, and all the badges of the Episcopal dignity. And the forementioned writer of the Lives of the Officers of State takes notice, that he also laid 250 THE SEE OF GLASGOW. out a great deal of money in carrying on the building of the vestry, which was begun by his predecessor Bishop Lau- der, where his arms are likewise to be seen by the curious. But for all the good things Bishop Cameron did, and which is strange, adds this author, he is as little beholden to the cha- rity of our historians as any man in his time. The learned Mr George Buchanan, and the Right Reverend Archbishop Spotiswood, from Mr George, characterize the bishop to have been a very worldly kind of man, and a great opres- sor, especially of his vassals within the bishopric. They tell us, moreover, that he made a very fearful exit at his country-seat of Loch wood, five or six miles north-east of the city of Glasgow, on Christmas eve of the year 1436 ; and then this gentleman says, ' Indeed, 'tis very hard * for me, though I have no particular attachment to Bi- 4 shop Cameron, to form such a bad opinion of the man, from ' what good things I have seen done by him ; and withal, ' considering how much he was favoured and employed by ' the best of princes, I mean King James II., and for so * long a time, too, in the first office of the state, and in the ' second place in the church, especially since good Mr * Buchanan brings no voucher to prove his assertion, only 4 he says, G it had been delivered by others, and constantly ' affirmed to be true, which amounts to be no more, in my ' humble opinion, than that he sets down the story upon no ? better authority than a mere hearsay. 1 * JAMES BRUCE, 1446. J James Bruce, son of Sir Ro- bert Bruce of Clackmannan, was the next bishop of this see. His first office in the church was the rectory of Kil- menie in Fife, about the year 1438, [.Mill.'] He was con- 6 Buchanan in vita Jacobi II. says, " Cum ab aliis sit proditum, et con- " stanti rnmore perynlgatum." * Bishop Cameron wrote or enacted canons, which are still extant in ma- nuscript in Bibliotheca Harl. No. 4651. Vol. I. p. 47. THE SEE OF GLASGOW. 251 secrated bishop of Dundee at Dunfermline, " Dominica in septuagesima," or 4th February 1441, [Ibid.] In the year 1444, he became lord chancellor of Scotland ; and as he had been greatly insulted in his bishopric of Dunkeld by one Ro- bert Reoch Macdonachy, (i. e. the family of the now Strow- an Robertson,) he is said to have been weary of that see ; and so, upon the death of Bishop Cameron, he was trans- lated to the see of Glasgow : but before the necessary forms were dispatched, death took him off the stage of life, [Fordun.] The see of Glasgow was still vacant the 4th October 1447, after the death of Bishop Cameron. [Cart. Glasg.} WILLIAM TURNBULL, 1448.] William Turnbull, a son of the family of Bedrule in the county of Roxburgh. He was first a prebendary of Glasgow, and afterward doctor of laws, and archdeacon of St Andrews within the bounds of Lothian, a privy-counsellor, and keeper of the privy-seal. He is stiled " William de Turnbull, Domino praebendae privati sigilli custode," anno 1441, [Reg. Chart.] Hebe- came bishop of Glasgow in the beginning of the year 1448, and received consecration in the month of April. Accor- dingly, we find William was bishop anno 1449, 1452, and 1453, [Reg. CJiart.] anno 1450 and 1451, [C. Dunferm.] anno 1451, [C. Paslet.] anno 1452, [Fordun. and Cart. Mor.] anno 1453, [Hay from Cartul. of St Giles ;] and William is bishop 1449, 1450, and 1453, under the sur- name of William Turnbull, [C. Glasg.] and [Ibid.] the king says, * nostro consiliario et consanguineo, pro cordiali * affectione et singular! favore, quern erga ipsum gerimus, f et pro suo fideli consilio, et gratuitis servitiis nobis mul- ' tipliciter impensis," 1 anno Dom. 1449, et reg. 14. This bishop was a person of an excellent character. In the year 1452, or 3, he procured a bull from Pope Nicholas V. for erecting a college for literature within the city of Glasgow ; after the complete settlement of which noble monument of 252 THE SEE OF GLASGOW. his care for the cultivating of learning, it seems he took a journey to Rome, where he died on the 3d September 1454.* ANDREW MUIRHEAD, 1455.] Andrew Muirhead, a son of the family of Lachop in the shire of Lanark, a man noted for learning and piety, was first rector of Cadzow, (now Hamilton,) and then next was preferred to this see. We find him bishop here anno 1456, [C. Glasg.} anno 1469, Inv. Aberd,~\ anno 1459, " et consecrationis quarto ;" it. 1452, 1463, 1465, 1467, 1470, and 1473, [Reg. Chart.} Upon the death of King James II. anno 1460, this bishop was named one of the lords of the regency dur- ing the young king's non-age. He was one of the com- missioners who went to England in the year 1462, in or- der to negociate a truce between the two nations, \jRy- mer,] which was accordingly effectuated, at the city of York, 19th December same year.-|- Again, in the year 1468, this bishop, with some others, were sent into Den- mark to treat about a marriage between our king and a daughter of that crown, which commission had likewise a good effect, [Torffaeus ;] and again, in the year 1472, he went with others in a commission to cultivate a farther pro- rogation of truce with the kingdom of England, which they also settled, [Rymer.~] This bishop founded the vicars of the choir, a settlement which had not been in the church before, " Fundator vicarior. choiri in ecclesia Glasguen." [C. Glasg. et Nisb. Herald. Vol. II. App. p. 261.] He also adorned and beautified the cathedral, in which, on the north side of the nave, on the roof, is still to be seen his coat of arms, and adorned with a mitre exquisitely graved, [Nisbet, Ibidem.} In the year 1471, he founded, near to * 3d Dec. 1156, according to the chronicle of King James II., apparent- ly a contemporary record. f 9th Dec. ( Foedera, VoL XI. p. 311,) but the names of the ambassadors are not mentioned. THE SEE OF GLASGOW. 253 the precinct of his Episcopal palace at Glasgow, an hospital, which he dedicated to the honour of St Nicholas, and upon the front over the door are the bishop's arms. The hospital had endowments for twelve old men and a priest to perform divine service at the hours of canonical devotion, [Ibid.] He died 20th November 1473. {Obituary Glasg.] JOHN LAIXG, 1474] John Laing, of the family of Redhouse in the shire of Edinburgh, was first rector of Tannadice in the shire of Angus, and vicar of Linlithgow, and was next preferred to the office of high treasurer in the year 1465, [Officers of State, p. 39-] which last office he held till the year 1468, at which time he was made lord-register, and about this period he enjoyed the rectories of Suthet and Newlands. Again, in the year 1471, he was re- placed in the treasury, which high office he kept till the year 1474 ; when he was now, by the king's special recommen- dation, promoted to the Episcopal see of Glasgow. John Laing is elect of Glasgow, and treasurer, in the year 1473-4, [R. Chart.] His accounts as king's treasurer are taken off December 2. 1474, [C. Glasg:] He was bishop anno 1476 and 1478, [R. Chart.-] also 27th July 1479, [C. Arbr.] In the year 1473 this bishop shewed himself so good an in- strument in reconciling the king and his brother the Duke of Albany, and the king, it seems, was so well pleased with, and mindful of that piece of service, that, when that office came to be vacant in the end of the year 1482, he constituted him lord high chancellor ; and so we find him bishop and chancellor November 16. 1482, [R. Chart.] But, before he had enjoyed that office full six months, he died on the llth of January 1482-3. [Officers of State, et Chart. Publ. and Obituary of Glasgow.] GEORGE CAEMICHAEL, Elect, 1482-3.] George Car- michael, a son of the family of Carmichael in the shire of Lanark, was elected bishop of Glasgow, being then trea- 254 THE SEE OF GLASGOW. surer of this see, as rector of Carnwath. But ?he died be- fore his consecration, in the year 1483, [Charta Jacobi Bonar de Rossy, an no 1483, Georgia decto Glasguen.] He is also elect of Glasgow 18th March 1482-3, [R. Chart.] and " Electus Glasguensis" sits in the Parliament the 24th February and 1st March 1482-3, the 27th June 1483, and the 24th February 1483-4. So the rolls are marked. ROBERT BLACADER, 1484.] Robert Blacader, the son of Sir Patrick Blacader of Tulliallan, by Elizabeth his wife, one of the daughters and co-heirs of Sir James Ed- mondstone of that Ilk, was first a prebendary of Glasgow, and rector of Cardross, [Chartul. Glasg.] He was translat- ed from the see of Aberdeen to this of Glasgow, anno 1484. He was bishop here anno 1484-5, \Hay~ 1 s MS.] anno 1485 and 1491, [Inv. Aberd,] anno 1486, 1487, 1488, 1494, 1495, 1499, [C. Paslet.} August 12. 1489, and August 31. 1490, [Mar.] Robert is bishop anno 1496, [Cart. Cambusk.] He has the title of archbishop of Glasgow, anno Dom. 1500, [C. Pasl.] as he has also January 22. 1506, [Clackmannan.] He was still bishop here anno 1507, in the fourth year of Pope Julius II. [C. Cambusk.] This bishop had so much favour at Rome, that he obtained from the Pope the see of Glasgow to be erected into an arch- bishopric, whose suffragans were appointed the diocesans of Dunkeld, Dunblane, Galloway, andArgyle, [C. Glasg.] yet the original erection by Pope Innocent VIII. anno Dom. 1391, Pontificatus 8vo. expressly calls the present bishop of Glasgow William, [Ibid.] He was frequently employed in the public transactions with the English, and particularly in the year 1505. He, together with the Earl of BothweD, and Andrew Foreman, prior * of Pittenweem, * At the time elect of Moray. See Young's Account of the Marriage of James IV. and Margaret, in the Second Edition of Leland's Collectanea, p. 258, et seq. THE SEE OF GLASGOW. 255 did negociate the marriage betwixt King James IV. and Margaret, eldest daughter of Henry VII. which has proved the foundation of the union of these two kingdoms. This bishop died in a journey to the Holy Land, anno Dom. 1508, [Lesley,'] or, as the Obituary of Glasgow has it, July 28. that year. JAMES BETHITXE, 1508.] James Beaton, al. Bethune, the youngest son of John Bethune, laird of Balfour in Fife, [Missive Letter of Henry Bethune, present laird of Balfour, to Mr Keith,] was provost of Bothwell, anno 1503, [Rymer,~\ prior of Whitehern, and abbot of Dun- fermline, anno 1504, and treasurer of the kingdom 1505. In the year 1508, he became elect of Galloway, but before he had sat one year in that see he was translated to Glas- gow, at which time he resigned the office of lord treasurer. In the year 1515, this bishop was made lord chancellor ; and as he was in great favour with John duke of Albany, regent of the kingdom, he got likewise the abbacies of Ar- broath and Kilwinning in commendam. He is elect of Glas- gow anno 1508, and next year bishop, [Reg. Chart. \ He was archbishop here and chancellor anno 1515 and 1516, [Reg. Chart, et ErroL] When the governor went over into France anno 1517, the archbishop of Glasgow was made one of the lords of the regency ; but discords arising among them, they all thought it convenient to devolve the whole power upon the Earl of Arran, who summoned a convention of the nobility to meet at Edinburgh on the 29th of April, which accordingly was done in the house of Archbishop Bethune, at the foot of Blackfriar's Wynd, on the east side, over the entry of which the arms of the fa- mily of Bethune are to be seen to this day. It had been resolved before hand to apprehend the Earl of Angus, who, smelling the design, sent his uncle, the famous Gavin Dou- glas bishop of Dunkeld, to the chancellor Archbishop Bea- ton, to see to get differences composed. Though the chan- 256 THE SEE OF GLASGOW. cellor was deeply engaged against the Earl of Angus, yet he would fain have excused himself, and laid all the blame upon the Earl of Arran ; and so in the end he concluded with saying, There is no remedy, upon my conscience I cannot help it ; and at the same instant beating on his breast with his hand, and not reflecting what would be the consequence, a coat of mail, which he had under his ecclesiastical habit, returned by the blow a rattling sound, which Bishop Douglas perceiving, gave his brother bishop this severe re- primand, * How now, my Lord,' says he, ' I think your ' conscience clatters ; we are priests, and to put on armour, * or to bear arms, is not altogether consistent with our cha- ' racter.' After this ensued a very hot skirmish betwixt the two parties, in which the Earl of Angus chanced to get the better ; and Archbishop Bethune seeing the day lost, fled for sanctuary to the church of the Blackfriars, and was there taken out from behind the altar, and would certainly have been slain had not Bishop Douglas interceded for him and saved his life, \Buclmnan., and Officers of State.'} He possessed the see of Glasgow till the year 1522, which he says was " consecrationis nostrae 14to." [_C. CambusJc.] and was then translated to the primacy of St Andrews. During his residency at Glasgow he inclosed the Episcopal palace in that city with a magnificent stone-wall of aisler- work, toward the east, south, and west, with a bastion over the one corner and a tower over the other, fronting to the High-street, upon which are fixed in different places his coat of arms. He augmented the altarages in the choir of the cathedral, over which also his arms are affixed ; and he likewise built or repaired several bridges within the re- gality, and about the city of Glasgow, and his arms stand upon them as lasting monuments of his public beneficence. For more concerning this prelate, see the Bishops of St Andrews. GAVIX DUNBAR, 1524.] Gavin Dunbar, of the family THE SEE OF GLASGOW. 257 of Cumnock, [Regist. Chart. B. 25. No. 99-] and ne- phew to Gavin Dunbar bishop at the same time of the see of Aberdeen, [Cart. Cambusk.] was preferred to the priory of Whitehern in Galloway. Being a person of polite letters, he was pitched upon to have the education of the young King James V. entrusted to him ; and he managed that province so well, that after the vacancy of the see of Glas- gow, which followed the translation of Archbishop Bethune from this see to that of St Andrews, the regents of the kingdom did, by letters-patent 27th September 1524, pre- sent him to this see of Glasgow ; and on the 22d December the same year, 1524, the following gift is to be seen in the registers, viz. ' With full power and faculty to Gavin Dun- ' bar, prior of Whitehern, and postulate of Glasgow, to ' present whatsoever qualified person or persons to all be- ' nifices that shall happen to vaik within the kirk and dio- 4 cese of Glasgow, induring the time of the vacancy of the 4 see, which was pertaining to the king's presentation, 1 [Officers of State, p. 76.] He was bishop of Glasgow, anno 2 do regis, i. e. anno Dom. 1524, [Regist. Chart.'] In the year 1526, two witnesses are, " Gavino episcopo " Glasguen." and " Gavino episcopo Aberdonen." [Ibid.] In the year 1526, this archbishop was one of the privy- council, and on the 21st August 1528 was made lord chan- cellor. Gawand was bishop of GlasgoAv in February 1527-8 [Mr Keith's App. p. 4.] He was bishop and chancellor 16th March anno 1528-9, [Reg. Chart.] He was arch- bishop and chancellor the 16th day of February 1531-2, [Cart. Aberd.] as he also was May 25. A. R. 25. i. e. 1538, [Mar.] He is still " Cancellarius et commendatarius in- " sulae missarum," (h. e. Inchaffray,) anno 1540 ; and we find him bishop anno 1546, [Regist. Chart. ] When the king went to France, in the year 1536, to solemnize his marriage with Magdalen, the daughter of that crown, his Majesty left the archbishop one of the lords of the regency during his absence ; and about this time . Stra- down in Banff Strathphilun, i: Killin Strathaven or Stre- van, v. Evandale Lanark Stromness, v. Sand- wick Strowan, v. Blair in Athole Strowan, v. Mony- vaird in Strath - ern Suddick, v. South- wick and Cowend Strathconnan Ross Strathdone in Mar Aberdeen Stramiglo Fife StricheninBuchan Aberdeen Strickmartin Forfar Stronsay, Ethay annexed Orkney Sudan Teviotdale Suddie Ross Swintoun Berwick Diocese. Presbytery. Commissariat, Brechin Brechin Brechin Ayr Glasgow Galloway Stranraer Glasgow Wigton Glasgow Hamilton Glasgow Ross Dingwall Aberdeen Alford Dunkeld Couper Aberdeen Deer St Andrews Dundee Orkney Kirkwall Glasgow Jedburgh Ross Chanonry Glasgow Chirnside Ross Aberdeen Dunkeld Aberdeen St Andrews For Southdean, see Sudan. Strachur, presbytery of Dunoon, omitted. Speymouth, presbytery of Elgin, omitted. Strath, presbytery of Skye, omitted. Snizort, presbytery of Skye, omitted. Small Isles, ditto. PARISHES IN SCOTLAND. 367 Parishes. Shire. Diocese. Presbytery. Commissar lot. TAIN or Tayiie Tannadice Tarbat and Arochar Tarbat Tarland in Mar, Migrie annexed Tarvess in Formar- tine Telen or Tylen, an archdeaconry Tempel, Muirfoot and Nicolson an- nexed Tereccles, vulgo Ter regies Thurso Tilliallan Tillicultrie Tingwall in Zet- land, of old an archdeaconry and cathedral, Wise- dell annexed Tinnergarth in An- nandale Tinrom in Niths- dale Ross For far Dumbarton Ross Aberdeen Aberdeen Forfar Mid -Loth. T. Ross St Andrews Glasgow Ross Aberdeen Aberdeen Dunkeld Edinburgh Tain Ross Forfar St Andrews- Dumbarton Glasgow Tain Roxburgh Caithness Perth Clackmanan Glasgow Caithness Dunblane Dunblane Kincardine Aberdeen El Ion Aberdeen Dundee Dunkeld Dalkeith Edinburgh Dumfries Dumfries Thurso Caithness Dunblane Dunblane D unblane D unblane Orkney Orkney Skalloway Orkney Dumfries Glasgow Lochmaben Dumfries Dumfries Glasgow Penpont Dumfries For St John's Clachan, see Old Clachan under C. For St. John's Kirk, see Coyington ; for St. Johnstone in Mull, see Killean ; for St. Peters, see Bun-ay ; for Sandness, see Walls ; for StanehouLC, see Firth. Southdean in Roxburgh is omitted. For Stronsee, see Ethac; for StratMUan, see Killin; for Strathbrock, see Uphall. 368 PARISHES IN SCOTLAND. Parishes. Shire. Diocese. Presbytery, Commissariat. Tinwald in Niths- dale, whereto Dumfries Glasgow Dumfries Dumfries Trailflat annexed Tippermoor Perth Dunkeld Perth Dunkeld Tolbooth-kirk Edinburgh Edinburgh Edinburgh Edinburgh Tongueland, an ab- bacy Kirkcudbr. Galloway Kirkcudbr. Kirkcudbr. Torbolton in Kyle Ayr Glasgow Ayr Glasgow Torphichen Mid-Loth. Edinburgh Linlithgow Edinburgh Torrieburn Fife St Andrews Dunferml. Torthorwold in Nithsdale Dumfries Glasgow Dumfries Dumfries Toskerton in Rinns of Galloway, an- nexed to Stony- Wigton Galloway Stranraer Wigton kirk Touch in Mar Aberdeen Aberdeen Alford Aberdeen Towie in Mar, al. Kinbettoch Aberdeen Aberdeen Alford Aberdeen Tranent, a preb. East-Loth. Edinburgh Haddington Edinburgh Traqueir, Keilie annexed Tweeddale Glasgow Peebles Peebles Troqueir in Gallo- way Kirkcudbr. Galloway Dumfries Dumfries Tresta, in the is- land Fetler in Orkney Orkney Skalloway Orkney Zetland Trinity Gask (vul- go Tarnitie) in Strathern, Kin- Perth Dunblane Auchterar. Dunblane kell annexed Tullinessel Aberdeen Aberdeen Alford Aberdeen Tunge in Strath- navar Sutherland Caithness Thurso Caithness Tyningham, Ald- hairi annexed East-Loth. Edinburgh Dunbar Edinburgh PARISHES IN SCOTLAND. 369 Parishes. Shire. Diocese. Presbytery. Commissariat. Turreff, pars, and preb. Aberdeen Aberdeen Turreff Aberdeen Tweedsmuir Tweeddale Glasgow Peebles Peebles Twyname, a preb. Kirkchrist annex. Kirkcudbr. Galloway Kirkcudbr. Kirkcudbr. Tyrie in Buchan Aberdeen Aberdeen Deer Aberdeen U UDNIE in Formar- tine Aberdeen Aberdeen Ellon Aberdeen Ugston, v. Ogston Une, v. Oyne in Garioch Unst in Zetland Orkney Orkney Skalloway Orkney Unthank, annexed to Duffus, pars. Moray Moray Elgin Moray Uphall, or Strath- brock West-Loth. Edinburgh Linlithgow Edinburgh Urquhart, Bolleis- ken annexed Inverness Moray Inverness Inverness Urquhart Moray Moray Elgin Moray Urquhart, alias Nairn and Ross Dingwall Ross Ferintosh Ross Urray and Gil- christ Ross Ross Dingwall Ross V. VlSIBLE-KlRK, alias Barnwell Ayr Glasgow Ayr Glasgow in Kyle For Thankerton, see Covington ; for Till ibole, see Fossoway; for Trailhow, see Cumbertrees ; for Tullibody, see Alloa. Tilloch is omitted, being annexed to Glen- muick. Tor Thynholm, see Thyname. Tongue, presbytery of Tongue, omitted. Torosay, presbytery of Mull, omitted. Tiree, presbjtery of Mull, omitted. Thurw, presbytery of Thurso, omitted. TJig, presbytery of Lewis, omitted. A a 370 PARISHES IN SCOTLAND. Parishes* Shire. Diocese. Presbytery. Commissariat. W. WACCHOP in Esk> dale Teviotdale Glasgow Middlebie Dumfries Walls, vulgo Waas, in Orkney, Flotta Orkney Orkney Kirkwall Orkney annexed Walls in Zetland, Sandness, Papas- Orkney Orkney Skalloway Orkney tor & Foulaannex. Walston Lanerk Glasgow Biggar Lanerk Wamfray in An- nandale, alias Dumfries Glasgow Lochmaben Dumfries Wamphrey Watten Caithness Caithness Thurso Caithness Weint in Athole Perth Dimkeld Dunkeld Dunkeld Weemys Fife St Andrews Kirkcaldy St Andrews West-Calder Mid-Loth. Edinburgh Linlithgow Edinburgh West-Kirk, or St Cuthberts, two Mid-Loth. Edinburgh Edinburgh Edinburgh ministers West -Kirk in Esk- dale Teviotdale Glasgow Middlebie Dumfries Wester-Lenzie, al. Kirkintulloch Dumbarton Glasgow Glasgow Westra, pars. preb. Papa Westra an- Orkney Orkney Kirkwall Orkney nexed Westruther in the Merse Berwick Edinburgh Ersilton Lauder Whalsey in Zet- land, annexed to Orkney Orkney Skalloway Orkney Nesting White-Kirk East-Loth. Edinburgh Dunbar Edinburgh Whittingham East-Loth. Edinburgh Dunbar Edinburgh Whiterne, preb. Candida Casa Wigton Galloway Wigton Wigton PARISHES IN SCOTLAND. 371 Parishes. Shire. Diocese. Presbytery. Commissariat. Whitsun in the Merse Berwick Edinburgh Chirnside Lauder Wick Caithness Caithness Thurso Caithness Wigton, pars, and preb. Wigton Galloway Wigton Wigton Wisedell, or Wool- ston rectmsVfool- stounjtw/g-oWoo- Lanerk Glasgow Lanerk Lanerk stoun or Wiston Woolston, Borth- Teviotdale Glasgow Jedburgh Peebles wick annexed Y. YARROW Selkirk or Glasgow Selkirk Peebles Forest Yeatholme, vulgo Yettam Teviotdale Glasgow Kelso Peebles Yell, in Zetland, hath three kirks t,725. Hamnabo, or Southkirk, Ret- Orkney Orkney Skalloway Orkney firth, or Middle- kirk, and Glupe, the Northkirk Yester, alias St Bothans East-Loth. Edinburgh Haddington Edinburgh For Wendal, see Laminglon; for Wedale, see Stovre; for Wisedell, see Tingwall. 373 LIST OF THE POPES, AND THE DATE OF THEIR ADVANCEMENT FKOM ANNO CHRISTI 1000. Pontiff. John XVII. . John XVIII. Sergius IV. Benedict VIII. A. D. 1003 1003 1009 1012 Gregory V. antipapa. John XIX. . . . 1024 Benedict IX. . . 1034 Silvester III. and John XX. antip. Gregory VI. . .'.. .' 1044 Clement II. .' I . 1046 Damascus II. . . 1048 StLeoIX. . . . 1049 Victor II 1054 Stephen IX. . . . 1057 Nicolas II. . u /;, 1059 Benedict X. antip. Alexander II. . . 1061 Honorius II. antip. St Gregory VII. . 1073 Clement III. antip. Victor III. . . . 1086 Urban II 1087 Pascal II 1099 GelasiusII. . . . 1118 Callistus II. ... 1119 Honorius II. 1124 Pontiff. A. D. Innocent II. . . . 1130 Anacletus II. antip. Victor II. antip. Celestinll. . . . 1143 Lucius II. ... 1144 Eugenius III. . . 1145 Anastasius IV. . . 1153 Hadrian IV. . . . 1154 Alexander III. . . 1159 Victor IV. antip. Paschalis III. antip. Callistus III. antip. Lucius III. . . . 1181 Urban III. ... . 1185 Gregory VIII. . . 1187 Clement III. . . . 1188 Celestin III. . . . 1191 Innocent III. . . . 1199 Honorius III. . . 1216 Gregory IX. . . . 1227 Celestin IV. ... 1241 Innocent IV. .'- . . 1243 Alexander IV. . . 1254 Urban IV. . . . 1261 Clemens IV. ... 1265 Gregory X. . . . 1271 Innocent V. 1276 374 LIST OF THE POPES. Pontiff. Hadrian V. ... John XXL . . . Nicolas III. A. D. 1276 1276 1277 Pontiff. Nicolas V Callistus III. . . . Pius II A. D. 1447 1455 1458 Martin IV. . . . 1281 Paul II 1464 Honorius IV. . . Nicolas IV. . . . St Celestin V. . . Boniface VIII. . . 1285 1287 1294 1294 Sixtus IV. ... Innocent VIII. . Alexander VI. . . Pius III 1471 1484 1492 1503 Benedict XI. . . Clement V. ... John XXII. . . . Benedict XII. . . Clement V7. . . . 1303 1305 1316 1334 1342 Julius II Leo X. .... Hadrian VI. . . . Clement VII. . . Paul III 1503 1513 1522 1523 1534 Innocent VI. . . . Urban V. . . . . 1352 1362 Julius III. . . . Marcellus II. 1550 1555 Gregory XI. . . . Urban VI 1371 1378 PaulusIV. . . . Pius IV 1555 1559 Clement VII. antlp. Boniface IX. . . Benedict XIII antip 1378 1389 1394 PiusV Gregory XIII. . . Sixtus V 1566 1572 1585 Innocent VII. . . Gregory XII. Alexander V. . . John XXIII. . . IVIartin V. 1404 1406 1409 1410 1417 Urban VII. . . . Gregory XIV. . . Innocent IX. . . Clement VIII. . . Leo XI 1590 1590 1591 1592 1605 Clement VIII. antip. Eugenius IV. . . Felix V. antip. . . 1424 1431 1439 PaulV. . . . . Gregory XV. . . Urban VIII. . . . 1605 1621 1623 375 KINGS OF SCOTLAND BEGAN TO REIGN, Constantine III. . 904 Malcolm I. . . " . 943 Indulfus, .... 952 Duffus, . .' .V. . 961 Culenus, .... Kenneth IIL . . Constantine IV. . . Grimus, .... Malcolm II. ... Duncan I. , . * p^. Macbeth, .... Malcolm III. Canmoir, 1057 Donald VII. . . . 1093 Duncan II. ... 1094 Edgar, .... 1098 Alexander I. ... 1107 David I. Saint, . . 1124 Malcolm IV. Maiden, William, v . . . Alexander II. . . Alexander III. . . John Baliol, ... Robert I. Bruce, David II. Bruce, Edward Baliol, . . Robert II. Stuart, . Robert III. . . . James I. .... James II James III. . . . James IV. . . . James V Mary, A KALENDAR OF SCOTS SAINTS, SHEWING Upon what Days their several FESTIVALS are celebrated throughout the Year. Anno JANUARY christL 7. St Kentigern, widow, in Scotland, .... 560 8. St. Nethalen, bishop and confessor, ibid. . . . 452 9. St Fillan, abbot, 703 13. St Mungo, bishop of Glasgow, 578 16. St Furce, patron of Peronne in France, grandchild to Eugenius IV. king of Scotland, .... 635 376 CALENDAR OF SCOTS SAINTS. Anno Christi. 21. St Vimin, bishop in Scotland, 715 29- Makwolok, bishop in Scotland, ....... 720 30. St Macglastian, bishop in Scotland, 814 31. St Modoch, bishop in Scotland, 318 FEBRUAEY 1. St Bride, virgin, in Scotland, 524 4. St Modan, abbot in Scotland, 507 7. St Ronan, bishop and confessor in Scotland, . . 603 17. St Finnan, bishop of Northumberland and confessor in Scotland, 674 17 St Finton, prior in Scotland, 973 18. St Colman, confessor and successor to St Finnan, 689 MARCH 1. St Minnan, archdeacon and confessor in Scotland, 879 1. St Marnan, bishop and confessor in Scotland, . 655 2. St Cedde, bishop of the Merse in Scotland, . . 746 4. St Adrian, bishop of St Andrews and martyr . 874 6. St Baldrede, bishop of Glasgow and confessor, successor to Mungo, 608 6. St Fredoline, confessor, 500 8. St Duthake, bishop and confessor in Scotland, 1249 10. St Mackessage, bishop and confessor in Scotland, 520 10. St Hemelin, confessor, a Scotsman, .... 822 11. Constantine, king of Scotland, was monk and martyr, . . . . , 556 13. Kennoch, virgin in Scotland, 1007 17. St Patrick, apostle of Ireland, Scotsman, . . . 435 17. St Kyrinus or Kirstinus, sirnamed Bonifacius, bishop of Ross, 660 18. St Finnan, bishop and confessor in Scotland, . 689 20. St Cuthbert, bishop and confessor in Scotland, . APRIL 1 . St Gilbert, bishop of Caithness, 1170 5. St Tigernake, bishop and confessor in Scotland, 823 6. St Bercham, bishop and confessor . . . . 839 13. St Guinoche, bishop and confessor in Scotland, 875 CALENDAR OF SCOTS SAINTS. 377 Anno Christi. 15. St Munde, abbot and confessor in Argyle, . . 962 16. St Magnus or Mans, martyr in Orkney, . . . 1104 17. St Donan, abbot and confessor in Scotland, . . 840 MAY 1. St Asaph, bishop and confessor, disciple to St Mungo, 608 1 . St Ultan, confessor, brother to St Furse, Scotsman, 635 8. St Gibrian, confessor, Scotsman, 532 12. St Congal, abbot of Halywood and confessor, . 1013 16. St Brandan, abbot and confessor in Scotland, . 1066 18. St Conwal, first archdeacon of Glasgow, and dis- ciple to St Mungo, 29th May died St David king of Scots, 612 JUNE 5. St Boniface, Scotsman, an apostle of Germany, martyr, 738 6. St Colm, bishop and confessor in Scotland, . . 1000 8. St Cyre, sister to St Fiacre, and King Eugenius IV. his daughter, 643 9. St Colme, abbot and confessor in Scotland . . 605 12. St Tarnan, archbishop of the Picts, ordained by StPalladius, 455 19- Translation of St Margaret queen of Scotland her body to Dunfermline, 1251 25. St Molonach, bishop and confessor, and disciple to St Brandan, . 629 JULY 1. St Serf, bishop of Orkney, 443 1. St Romuld, son to the king of Scotland, arch- bishop and martyr at Machlene, 670 3. St Guthagen, son to the king of Scotland, confes- sor under Dioclesian, 99 6. St. Palladius, or Padie, apostle of Scotland, . . 430 8. St Kilian, bishop of Herbipolis, Scotsman, . . 630 15. The Nine Virgins, daughters to St Donevald in Scotland, 712 18. St Thenna, widow, mother of St Mungo, . . 445 378 CALENDAR OF SCOTS SAINTS. Anno ChristL AUGUST 10. St Blane, bishop and confessor in Scotland, from whom Dunblane is named, . .... . 1000 18. St Inan, confessor at Irvine in Scotland . . . 839 24. St Erchad, bishop and confessor in Scotland, . 933 27- St Malrube, hermit, martyred by the Danes at Nairn in Scotland, ....... . 1024* 30. St Fiacre, abbot and confessor, son to Eugenius IV. king of Scotland ; he lies beside Meaux in France, 643 31. St Aidan, bishop of Northumberland, Scotsman, 637 SEPTEMBER 9- St Queran, abbot in Scotland, 876 1 6. St Ninian, bishop and confessor in Scotland, . . 437 22. St Lolan, bishop of Whitern and confessor in Scotland, 1034 23. St Thennan, abbot and confessor, master to King Eugenius VI 684 25. St Barre, bishop and conf. first bishop of Caithness, 1074 28. St Machan, bishop and confessor in Scotland, . 856 OCTOBER 8. St Triduane, virgin, in Scotland, 532 13. St Conwallan, abbot and confessor, .... 527 13. St Fintane and Findoche, virgins in Scotland, . 526 15. St Colman, bishop and confessor, 512 16. St Galle, abbot in Scotland, 590 17. St Rule, abbot, 368 18. St Monon, martyr at Arduena, 404 25. St Marnok, bishop and confessor, died at Kilmar- nock 322 26. St Bean, first bishop of Murthlack, translated to Aberdeen, 1010 29- St Kenneir, virgin and martyr at Cologne, one of 11,000, 450 30. St Tarkin, bishop and confessor in Scotland, . 889 31. St Foillan, bishop and martyr in Germany, Scots- man, 530 CALENDAR OF SCOTS SAINTS. 379 Anno Christl NOVEMBER 1. St Beye, virgin in Scotland, 896 2. St Maure, virgin, from whom Kilmaures is named, 899 3. St Englate, bishop and confessor in Scotland, . 966 6. St Willibrord, bishop and confessor in Friseland, Scotsman, 688 8. St Morok, confessor in Scotland, 817 8. St Gervad, bishop and confessor, 812 12. St Machar, bishop of Moray, and confessor in Scotland, 887 12. St Lewin, bishop and martyr at Ghent, Scotsman, 13. St Kilian, bishop and confessor in Franconia, Scotsman, 687 13. St Devinike, bishop and confessor in Scotland, . 887 14. St Middam, or Medan, bishop and confessor, pa- tron of Filorth, 503 15. St Machute, bishop and confessor, 553 16. St Margaret, queen of Scotland, died this day ; but others say November 26. But this might proceed from N. and O. style, 1097 17. St Fergus, bishop and confessor, forte Fergus, patron of Glammis, 505 20. St Maxence, daughter to king of Scotland, and martyr, 742 27. St Ode, virgin, daughter to king of Scotland, . 700 DECEMBER 1. St Eloy, bishop of Noion in France, Scotsman, 657 14. St Drostan, monk and confessor, brother by the mother-side to King Achaius, 587 18. St Manere, bishop and confessor in Scotland, . 824 22. St Ethernan, bishop and confessor, disciple to St Colme in Scotland, 582 AN ACCOUNT OF ALL THE RELIGIOUS HOUSES, THAT WERE IN SCOTLAND, AT THE TIME OF THE Jieformattom THIS WORK WAS COMPILED BY THE LEARNED AXD INGENIOUS GENTLEMAN*, JOHN SPOTISWOOD, OF SPOT1GWOOD, ESQ. THE LINEAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE MO8T HEVERESD FATHER IN COD, JOHN SPOTISWOOD, ARCHBISHOP OF ST. ANDREWS, AND LORD HIGH CHANCELLOR OF SCOTLAND. RELIGIOUS HOUSES. CHAP. I. OF THE DIVISION OF CHURCHMEN. ALL our churches formerly belonged either to Regulars or Seculars. The Regulars followed the rule of Augustine bishop of Hippo in Africa, of St Bennet, or of some private statutes approved by the Pope ; and lived, slept, and took their diet together, under the same roof. They were either canons, monks, or friars ; and their houses were called abbacies, priories, or convents. The Seculars had their private rules composed by their chapters, or borrowed from other colleges abroad ; which statutes were not commonly approved of by Rome. They lived separately in their cloisters, or in private houses near to their churches ; and were governed by a dean (decanus,) or provost (prcepositus.) Those that followed St Augustine's rule were, 1. The Regular Canons of St Augustine (Canonici Regvlares,) so called from their founder or reformer ; 2. The Praemon- stratenses ; 3. The Red-Friars, or De redemptione cap- tivorum ; 4. The Dominicans or Black-Friars ; 5. The Lazarites ; and, 6. The Canons of St Anthony. The others, that followed St Sennet's rule, were, 1. The Benedictines of Marmoutier (Majoris Monasterii ;) 384 RELIGIOUS HOUSES. 2. Of Cluny, named Cluniacenses ; 3. Of Tyron (Tyron- enses,) so called from their principal houses in France ; 4. The Cistertians (Cistertienses,) otherwise called Ber- nardines ; and, 5. Those who were designed of the con- vent of Vallis-caulium, ( Val des cJuwx,) in the diocese of Langres in France. The White-Friars, or Carmelites, had their beginning and name from mount Carmel in Syria, renowned for the dwelling of Elias and Elisha the prophets, who, as they pretend, were their founders. Albertus, patriarch of Jeru- salem, and native of the diocese of Amiens, closed them up in cloisters, and gave them some rules or statutes, in the year 1205 ; which were confirmed by Pope Honorius III. in the year 1217, and since by several of his suc- cessors. The Franciscans, so named from St Francis of Assise in Italy, who established them in the year 1206. They followed the rule that St Francis composed for them ; and were confirmed by Pope Innocent III. in the year 1209. The Carthusians, who were established upon the Carthu- sian mountains in the diocese of Grenoble in the province of Dauphine, followed also their private constitutions, which were given them by their founder, and approved of by Pope Alexander III. in the year 1176, and by the suc- ceeding Popes. All these religious orders were either endowed with suf- ficient rents for maintaining them, or were allowed to beg for their living. From whence ariseth a new division of churchmen ; the one called Rented Religious, who were endowed with several mortifications ; the others, Begging Friars, or Mendicants, who had little or nothing settled upon them. The first were the Canon-Regulars, monks of different orders, specified above ; as, Benedictines, Cis- tertians, Carthusians, Vallis-caulium, and the Red Friars, &c. : The others were the Black, Gray, and White Friars. RELIGIOUS HOUSES. 385 I shall therefore proceed to give an account of all the Monasteries, Priories, Collegiate Churches, Hospitals, and other Religious Houses that were amongst us in Scotland at the time of the Reformation, together with the names of their founders, year of foundation, and counties in which they were situated, in the following order. CHAP. II. OF THE CANON-REGULARS AND THEIR MONASTERIES. THE Canon-Regulars ofSt Augustine were first brought to Scotland by Atelwholphus, prior of St Oswald of Nostel in Yorkshire, and afterwards bishop of Carlisle ; who es- tablished them at Scone in the year 1114, at the desire of King Alexander I. They had twenty-eight monasteries in Scotland, which were as follow : 1. SCONE, in Stormont, a subdivision of the shire of Perth, situated a mile above Perth, upon the river Tay, was an abbey founded by King Alexander I. in the year 1114, and was dedicated to the Holy Trinity and St Mi- chael the archangel. It was the place where our kings were accustomed to be crowned, and where the fatal mar- ble chair, now at Westminster, was usually kept. It for- merly belonged to the Culdees, if we trust George Buchan- an and some other writers. The Extracta ex Chronicis Scotics, in the Advocates Library, says, that the first prior of this place was " Robertus Canonicus Sancti Oswaldi de Nostellis in Anglia." It was erected into a temporal lord- ship by King James VI. in favour of Sir David Murray, a cadet of the family of Tullibardine, in the year 1604. 2. LOCH-TAY, an island situate in Loch-Tay in the shire of Perth, was a cell or priory belonging to Scone, founded by the above King Alexander in the year 1122. Here B b 386 RELIGIOUS HOUSES. Sibylla his queen, daughter to Henry Beauclerk, king of England, died, and is buried. The most part of the buildings of this monastery are still extant. 3. IxcH-CoLME, an island in the river of Forth, two miles from Aberdour in Fife, was an abbey, founded by the said King Alexander about the year 1123, and dedi- cate to St Columba abbot of Hye, according to the Extrac- ta ex variis Chronicis Scotiae, which gives the following account of its foundation : ' vEmonia insula, seu monas- * terium nunc Sancti Columbse de ^Emonia, per dictum * Regem furidatur, circa annum Domini 1123, miraculose. ' Nam cum idem nobilis Rex, transitum faciens per passa- ' gium Reginae, exorta tempestus valida, flante Africo, ra- * tern cum naucleris, vix vita comite, compulit applicare ad * insulam ^Emoniam, ubi tune degebat quidam heremita in- ' sulanus ; qui, servitio Sancti Columbae deditus, ad quan- * dam inibi capellulam tenui victu, utpote lecte unius vaccae, * et conchis ac pisciculis marinis contentatus, sedule se ' dedit : de quibus cibariis Rex cum suis, tribus diebus, ' vento compellente, reficitur. Et quia Sanctum Colum- ' bam a juventute dilexit, in periculo maris, ut praedicitur, ' positus, vovit, Se, si ad praefatam insulam veheretur in- ' columis, aliquid memoria dignum ibidem facere. Et sic ' monasterium ibidem construxit canonicorum, et dotavit. 1 " Alanus de mortuo mari, (Mortimer,) miles, Dominus de Aberdour," mortifies to this abbacy ' omnes et tolas * dimidietates terrarem, villae suae de Aberdour Deo et * Monachis de insula Sancti Columbae, pro sepultura sibi * et posteris suis, in Ecclesia dicti monasterii. 1 Walter Bowmaker, abbot of this place, was one of the continuators of John Fordoun's Scoti-Chronicon, as is to be seen in the Liber Cartliusianorum de Perth, in the Advocates Library. He died in the year 1449- James Stuart of Beith, a cadet of the Lord Ochiltree, was made commendator of Inch-Colme, or St Colme, on the surrender RELIGIOUS HOUSES. 887 of Henry abbot of that monastery in the year 1543. His second son, Henry Stuart, was, by the special favour of King James VI. created a peer, by the title of Lord St Colme, in the year 1611. See Cratcford's Peerage. 4. ST ANDREWS, situate upon the sea-side in the shire of Fife, was a priory or cathedral church, dedicate to St Andrew the apostle, and founded by the forenamed King Alexander. The canons were brought from Scone, by Robert bishop of St Andrew's, in the year 1140. This place formerly belonged to the Culdees. The prior of this church wore, in all public meetings, and in solemn ser- vices upon festival days, the pontifical ornaments, viz. a mitre, gloves, ring, cross, crosier, and sandals or slippers, as the bishops ; and in Parliament had the precedence of all abbots and priors, by an act made in his favours by King James I. The cells or priories belonging to St Andrews were, Lochlevin, Portmoak, Monimusk, the isle of May, and Pittenweem. 5. LOCHLEVEN, in the shire of Kinross, formerly a house belonging to the Culdees, in whose place the Canon- Regulars were introduced by the bishop of St Andrews. The priory was dedicate to St Serf, or Servanus, a monk or pilgrim, who, as is reported, came from Canaan to Inch- keith, and got Merkinglass and Culross for his possessions. Brudeus, a Pictish king, founded this place in honour of him, and gave the isle of Lochleven to his Culdees ; which King David I. bestowed upon St Andrews, with the other possessions belonging thereto. The priory is little more than a mile south-east from the castle of Lochleven, in the loch, the ruins whereof appear as yet. Our famous historian, Andrew Winton, was prior of this place. His history, which is in old Scottish metre, is still extant in the Advocates Library. It begins at the creation of the * It was printed and published in the year 1795, and consists of two handsome octavo volume*. 388 RELIGIOUS HOUSES. world, and concludes with the captivity of King James I. in England, during whose reign he died. 6. POETMOACK, so called from St Moack, situate in St Servanus's isle, in the shire of Kinross, on the north side of the water of Leven, was founded by Eogasch king of the Picts, and was formerly inhabited by the Cul- dees. It was consecrate to the Virgin Mary, and was unit- ed to St Leonard's college by John Winram sub-prior of St Andrews, the 5th October 1570. Nothing of this mo- nastery remains save the parish church, which answers to the presbytery of Kirkcaldy. 7. MONIMUSK, in the shire of Aberdeen. It was former- ly possessed by the Culdees. Gilchrist earl of Mar, in the reign of King William the Lion, built here a priory for the canon-regulars of St Andrews. After which the Culdees were turned out of their possessions ; which were bestowed upon the canons of this place by the bishops of St Andrews. The place was dedicated to the Virgin Mary, and was an- nexed to the bishopric of Dunblane by King James VI. in the year 1617. 8. The ISLE OF MAY, in the shire of Fife, at the mouth of the Frith of Forth, belonged of old to the monks of Reading in Yorkshire ; for whom King David I. founded here a cell or monastery, and dedicated the place to all the saints. Afterwards it was consecrated to the memory of St Hadrian. William Lamberton, bishop of St Andrews, purchased it from the abbot of Reading ; and, notwith- standing the complaints made thereupon by Edward Lang- shanks king of England, bestowed it upon the canon-regu- lars of his cathedral, which story is to be seen in Prynne, Vol. III. p. 554. It was of old much frequented by bar- ren women, who went thither in pilgrimage. 9. PITTENWEEM, in the shire of Fife, was dedicated to the Virgin Mary, and had a great many lands belonging to it, with the churches of Rind, Anstruther- Wester, &c. which are now erected into a regality, called the regality RELIGIOUS HOUSES. 389 of Pittenweem, of which the lairds of Anstruther are heri- table bailies. Colonel Stuart, captain of his Majesty's Guards, is designed commendator of Pittenweem in the year 1567. His son, Frederick Stuart, was afterwards, by the favour of King James VI. raised to the dignity of Lord Pittenweem, in the year 1609 ; but, dying without male issue, the honour became extinct. 10. CARLILE, in Cumberland, almost encompassed with the rivers of Eden, Petereil, and Cand. This city was de- populated by the Danes ; and, after it had been buried in ashes near two hundred years, began to flourish again in the reign of King William Rufus. Henry I. of England founded here the cathedral church, and caused consecrate it to the Virgin Mary in the year 1111. The canons were brought from Nostel, near Pontefract in Yorkshire, at the desire of Mathilda his queen. The first bishop of that see was Athelwolphus, King Henry's confessor, mentioned above. The church was endowed with several rich gifts by King David and Prince Henry his son, as also by seve- ral of our countrymen, who were, during a number of years, masters of that city. 11. HOLYROODHOUSE, or, " Domus Sanctae Crucis," at the east end of the city of Edinburgh, in the shire of Mid- Lothian, was an abbey, built by King David I. in the year 1128, and dedicated to the Holy Cross. The canons were brought from St Andrews. John Bothwell, commendator of this place, and son to Adam bishop of Orkney, was ad- vanced to the peerage of this realm, December 20. 1607, by the title of Lord Holyroodhouse. The cells or priories depending on Holyroodhouse were, St Mary's Isle, Blantyre, Rowadill, Crusay, and Oronsay. 12. ST MARY'S ISLE, near Kirkcudbright in Galloway, was founded in the reign of Malcolm IV. or rather David I. by Fergus lord of Galloway, and caUed " Prioratus Sanctae Mariae de Trayll." The prior hereof was a lord and member of Parliament. 390 RELIGIOUS HOUSliS. 13. BLANTYRE, in Clydesdale, a priory of this order, was founded before the year 1296 ; for at time, " Frere " William prioyr de Blantyr" is a subscriber to^ Ragman 1 s- roll, Prynne, p. 663. Walter Stuart, commendator of this place, was lord privy-seal in the year 1595, and shortly after treasurer, upon the master of Glammis's demission. He was made a peer, by the title of Lord Blantyre, the 10th July 1606, from whom is descended the present Lord Blan- tyre. 14. ROWADILL, in the isle of Harries and shire of Ross, founded by Macleod of Harries. It was situated on the south-east point of that island, on the sea coast, under Ben Rowadill. 15. CHUSAY, in the Western isles, founded by St Co- lumba. 16. OROXSAY, one of the Western isles in the shire of Argyle, founded by the said St Columba. It gives the title of Lord to Archibald earl of Isla. 17. COLUNSAY, one of the Western isles, also in the shire of Argyle, was an abbey founded by the Lord of the Isles ; the canons whereof were brought from Holy rood- house. We have little knowledge of what passed there, or in the other isles, not only by their distance from the south, but more especially by the loss of their records. 18. CAMBUSKEXNETH, in the shire of Clackmannan, was founded by King David I. in the year 1147. The canons of this place were brought from Aroise, near to Arras in the country of Artois. The abbots hereof were formerly designed, in the subscription of charters, *' Abbates de Striveling," the abbey being situated about half a mile be- low that town, upon the north side of the river Forth. Alexander Miln, abbot of this place, was the first president of our Session, at the institution of the College of Justice by King James V. in the year 1532, and was employed m divers embassies by the said king. This abbacy belong* RELIGIOUS HOUSES. 391 now to Cowan's Hospital in Stirling, being sometime ago purchased from the Erskines of Alva. The priories belonging to this abbacy were, Insula Sti Colmoci and Rosneth. 19. INSULA STI COLMOCI, in Menteith, is said to have been founded by Murdoch earl of Menteith, who was kill- ed at the battle of Duplin in the year 1332. But it was certainly founded before his time ; for we find, in Prynne's Cdlecti&ns, Vol. III. p. 653, that " Adam priour de Tisle " de Saint ColmocK" swore fealty to Edward I. in the year 1296, as did also Alexander earl of Menteith, father to the above Eai'l Murdoch. 20. ROSNETH, in the shire of Lenox or Dumbarton, founded by the old Earls of Lenox, and consecrated to the Virgin Mary. It was first united to the royal chapel of Stirling by King James IV. and afterwards dissolved. Al- though it is said by some that this place was a monastery of canon-regulars, founded as above, yet, by the cartulary of Paisley, in the Advocates Library, fol. 356, it appears that it was only a parish church, given by Amelec, brother to Maldwin earl of Lenox, to the abbey of Paisley, in the reign of King Alexander II. 21. INCHMAHOME, an island situated in the loch of Menteith, (otherwise called, from this monastery, the loch of Inchmahome,) in the shire of Perth, was an abbey founded of old for canons of Cambuskenneth. It was also united by King James IV. to his royal chapel of Stirling. Thereafter it was dissolved from the college, and bestowed by King James V. upon John Lord Erskine, who was com- mendatory abbot thereof, and afterwards created Earl of Mar by Queen Mary, and, at the death of Matthew earl of Lenox, was chosen regent, in the year 1571. Although this place be mentioned, in most of our old lists of religious houses, as a distinct monastery from that of the " Insula Sti Colmoci," yet, for very good reasons, too long to be 392 RELIGIOUS HOUSES. inserted here, I am very apt to believe they were one and the same. 22. JEDBURGH, or JED WORTH, in Teviotdale, was an ab- bey, situated on the west side of the river of Jed, near to the place where it falleth into the river Teviot. King David I. founded this place for canons brought from Beuvais, (Bello- vacum,*) who were there established by Yvo Carnutensis, in a monastery dedicated to St Quintine, " in monasterio Sti Quintini Bellovacensis," whereof he was provost before he became bishop of Chartres. It was erected into a temporal lordship in favour of Sir Andrew Ker of Ferniherst, ances- tor to the Marquis of Lothian, 2d February 1622. The cells or priories belonging to Jed burgh were, Res- tennot and Canonby. 23. RESTENXOT, in Angus, situated a mile to the north of Forfar, and encompassed with a loch, except at one pas- sage, where it had a draw-bridge. Here all the papers and precious things belonging to Jedburgh were carefully kept. Robert, prior of this place, swears fealty to Edward Lang- shanks in the year 1296, according to Prynne. 24. CAXONBY, a priory, situated upon the river of Esk in Eskdale and shire of Roxburgh. It is uncertain by whom, or at what time it was founded, though we are pretty sure it was before the year 1296 ; for then William, prior of this convent, swears fealty to Edward I. king of Eng- land. This monastery was frequently overturned and burnt by the English, and the prior and canons thereof obliged to abandon their dwelling during the heat of the wars ; by which means, their records being so often destroyed and lost, I can give no further account of it. 25, INCHAFFRAY, (Insula missarum,) in Strathern, a subdivision of the shire of Perth, was an abbey founded by Gilbert earl of Strathern, in the year 1200, the canons whereof were brought from Scone. It was dedicated to the memory of St John the Evangelist. Frere Thomas was abbot of Inchaffray in the year 1296 ; and Mauritius, abbot of RELIGIOUS HOUSES. 393 this place, was present with King Robert the Bruce at Ban- nockburn, to which he brought, as is reported, the arm of St Fillan; whereof Boethius, Lib. 14. fol. 314, and Lesty y Lib. 7. p. 232. James Drummond, son to David Lord Drummond, having acquired a right to this monastery from Alexander Gordon bishop of Galloway, then commendator thereof, it was by the favour of King James VI. in the year 1607, erected to him in a temporal lordship, by the style of Lord Maderty. The cells or priories belonging to Inchaffray were, Strath- fillan, Scarinche, and Abernethy. 26. STRATHFILLAN, situate on the water of Dochart in Braedalbine a sub-division of the shire of Perth, was a pri- ory founded by King Robert the Bruce, and consecrate to St Fillan, in consideration of the assistance he had from that saint at the battle of Bannockburn in the year 1314. At the dissolution of religious houses, this priory, with all its re- venues and superiorities, was given by the king to Campbell of Glenorchy, ancestor to the Earl of Breadalbane, in whose possession it still remains. 27. SCARIXCHE, in the isle of Lewis and shire of Ross, founded by the Macleods of the Lewis, in honour of St Catan, " in honorem Sti Catani, cujus exuvias ibidem as- servari traditione acceptum est." 28. ABERNETHY, formerly the chief seat of the Pictish kings, near the mouth of the river Erne, in the shire of Perth, first a retreat for St Brigide or St Bride, and some virgins ; thereafter a bishop's seat, and in following years possessed by the Culdees. It was first founded by Necta- nus, a Pictish king ; and at length it became a priory of canons brought from Inchaffray in the year 1273. All these canons mentioned above wore a white robe, with a rochet (roclietum,) of fine linen above their gown, a sur- plice in the church, (superpellicmm,*) and an almuce (lamutium) formerly on their shoulders, thereafter on their left arm, hanging as far down as the ground. This almuce 394 RELIGIOUS HOUSES. was of a fine black or gray skin, brought from foreign coun- tries, and frequently lined with ermine, and serves to this day to distinguish the canon-regulars from the other reli- gious orders. CHAP. III. OF THE CANONS OF ST ANTHONY. THIS order of St Antlwmy had only one monastery in Scotland, which was seated at Leith, in the shire of Mid- Lothian, and is now called the South-Kirk. The religious hereof were brought from St Anthony of Vienne, in the pro- vince of Dauphiny in France, the residence of the superior- general of that congregation. Their houses were called hospitals, and their governors Pr acceptor es. It appears by a charter of Humbertus, chief or general of the order, in the year 1446, that these of Leith did not live very peaceably together. Upon the common seal of their chapter they carried a St Anthony, clothed with an old gown or mantle of an hermit ; and towards his right foot a wild sow ; and upon the circumference of it the following words : " Si- " gillum commune Capituli Sancti Anthonii prope Leith." They followed the rule of St Augustine, and wore a black gown, with a blue T of stuff on their left breast. They had neither an almuce nor a rochet, whereof the canon-regulars and bishops made use. CHAP. IV. OF THE BED FRIAES AND THEIR MONASTERIES. THE Red Friars, (who pretend to be canon-regulars, not- withstanding that that name, which they are willing to as- HOUSES. 395 eume, is strongly controverted by their adversaries,) are likewise called Trinity Friars or Mathitrines, from their house at Paris, which is dedicate to St Mathurine ; as also, * De redemptione captivorum, ri their office being to redeem Christian captives from Turkish slavery. They were esta- blished by St John of Matha, and Felix de Valois, an an- chorite at Cerfroid, " apud Cervum frigidum in territorio Meldensi," about three miles from Grandula. Innocent III. approves this institute, and grants several privileges to the order, which were confirmed by Pope Innocent IV. the 26th November 1246. St Thomas of Aquinas and St An- tonine commend this order in their sums. Their houses were named hospitals or ministries, and their superiors ministers, [Ministri.] Their substance or rents were divided into three parts, one of which was reserved for redeeming Christian slaves from amongst the infidels. * Ter- ' tia vero pars 1 (say their constitutions) ' reservetur ad re- 4 demptionem captivorum, qui sunt incarcerati pro fide 4 Christi a Paganish By a bull of Pope Innocent III. dated the 21st June 1209, it appears that they had six monasteries in Scotland whilst he was Pope. Thereafter the number increased amongst us ; and at the Reformation we find mention of thirteen houses, which were situate at the following places : 1. ABERDEEN*, the chief town of the shire of that name*, founded by King William the Lyon, where now the Trades hospital stands, and Trinity church. The king gave there- unto the lands of Banchory, Coway, Merellof, a fishing in * The width of the arch of the bridge ever the river Don at Aberdeen is 6G feet 10 inches. Perpendicular height to the water, 34 feet 6 inches. Depth of the water from the surface to the bottom under the arch at lovr water, 13 feet and a half. The breadth of the Castlegate of Aberdeen, is 158 feet 7 inches ; at some other parts only 142 feet 5 inches. The breadth of the Grassmarket in Edinburgh is 152 feet ; breadth of the J^awnmarket, Edinburgh, opposite to the Old Bank, is 85 feet, and length from the west end of the Luckenbooth< to the Weigh house i 596 feet. RELIGIOUS HOUSES. Dee and Don, with the mills of Skerthak, Rothenny, Tul- lifully, and Manismuch. Ragman 's-roll, in the year 1296, makes mention of " Frere Huwe ministre de Tordre de la Trinitie d' Aberdeen," &c. 2. D UNBAR, in the shire of Haddington, was founded by Patrick earl of Dunbar and March, in the year 1218. The lands of this monastery were at the Reformation granted to George Hume of Friarslands, ancestor to Hume of Furde. 3. HOWSTON, in the shire of Renfrew, was founded in the year 1226. Friar John, master of the Trinity-hospi- tal of Howston, is made mention of in the year 1296, by Prynne, p. 656. 4. SCOTLAND-WELL, situate on the north side of the Water of Leven, in the shire of Kinross, called in Latin Fons Scotia?, was an hospital, first founded by William Malvoisine, bishop of St Andrews, who died about the year 1238 ; which was afterwards bestowed upon the Red Friars, by David de Benham bishop of St Andrews, his immediate successor. His charter is dated " in crastino Circumcisio- nis Domini, anno 1250." The parish church of Moonzie, on the top of a hill to the south of Carny in Fife, in the presbytery of Cupar, with the parish church of Carnock in the presbytery of Dumfermline, belonged to this place. This foundation and gift occasioned the regular canons of St Andrews to complain to the Pope, that the bishop had in- troduced the Red Friars into a parish belonging to them, " eorundem prioris et capituli neglecto consensu ; w where- upon we have a bull of Pope Innocent IV. about the year 1250, for preventing such enterprises to the prejudice of the chapter of St Andrews. The ruins of the church and house are yet to be seen at the foot of the Bishops-hill. 5. FAILEFDKD, in the county of Ayr, founded in the year 1252. There is a charter of " Joannes de Graham," designed " Dominus de Thorbolton in Kyle Senescalli," granting, * pro salute animae suae, et Isabellae sponsae f suae, &c. Deo, et domui Failefurd, et fratri Johanni RELIGIOUS HOUSES. 397 * ministro, et fratribus ordinis sanctissimac Trinitatis ct * Captivorum, jus patronatus et advocationis Ecclesiae de ' Thorbolton. Datum apud Failefurd, in crastino Epipha- ' niae Domini, anno gratiae 1337.' This charter is confirm- ed " apud Dundonald. 5to die mensis Augusti, anno 1368,"" by John Lord Kyle and Earl of Carrick, who was after- wards king, and was named Robert III. 6. The MINISTRY or CROSS-CHURCH of Peebles, found- ed by^King Alexander III. in the 1257. See Boethius, Lib. 13. and " Joan Major, ad annum praedictum." King Ro- bert II. grants to Friar Thomas, designed " Capellano suo, pratum regium juxta villam de Peebles." And " Frere Thomas, ministere de Sanctae Croix de Peebles,"" is re- corded in Prynne's Collections, p. 662. 7. DORNOCK, in Sutherland, founded by Sir Patrick Murray, in the year 1271. The lands belonging to the mi- nistry of Berwick were given to this place, after the English had possessed themselves of that city. 8. BERWICK-UPON-TWEED, founded by one of our kings. Friar Adam, minister of the order of the Trinity Friars of Berwick, swears fealty to King Edward I. in the year 1296 9. DUNDEE, in the shire of Angus, founded by James Lindsay. His charter is confirmed by King Robert III. " apud Perth, die 24. Augusti, anno regni sui secundo,"" i. e. 1392. 10. 11. 12. 13. The remaining monasteries of this order were situate in the following places: viz. AtCROMARTY, or CRENACH, in the shire of Cromarty ; at LOCHFEAL, in the shire of Ayr ; at BRECHIN, in the shire of Angus ; and at LUFNESS, upon the Frith of Forth, in the shire of East-Lothian : All which places are mentioned, in ancient charters and records, as houses belonging to this order ; but having seen no distinct account of them, I am uncer- tain when or by whom they were founded. Their habit was white, with a red and blue cross patee upon their scapular. Their general chapter was held year- 398 RELIGIOUS HOUSES. ly at Whitsunday, " in octavis Pentecostes." Their way of living was much conform to that of the canons of St Victor at Paris. At their first institution their superior-general was elective, and chosen by the general chapter. CHAP. V. OF THE PRAEMONSTRATENSES AND THEIK MONASTERIES. THE Praemonstratenses were so named from their princi- pal monastery " Praemonstratum," in the diocese of Laon in France, which the monks of this order pretend was so called from its being " Divina revelatione Praemonstratum." This order is also called Candidus ordo, because their garb is entirely white. They followed the rule of St Augustine, which, they say, was delivered to them in golden letters, from himself, in a vision ; and were founded by St Norbert, a German archbishop of Magdeburgh, who obtained for himself and successors in that see the title of Primate of Germany. His order was confirmed by Pope Honorius II. and Innocent III. He retired with some companions about the year 11 20. There were of this order six monasteries in Scotland, at the following places, viz. 1. SOULS-SEAT, called (Sedes animarum, or Monasterium viridis stagnij) in Galloway, near Stranraer. St Malachias, an Irishman, is said to have founded here the first commu- nity ; which is surely a mistake : for it is certain, that the first religious of this order were brought here directly from Praemontre in France, as Johannes le Page relates, in his Siblioth. Praemonst. Lib. 1. p. 333. It was the mother of Holy wood and Whitehorn, and was founded by Fergus lord of Galloway, who became a canon-regular in the ab- bacy of Holyroodhouse, in the year 1160, after he had founded several abbeys and religious places, and endowed them with considerable revenues for the subsistence of the RELIGIOUS HOUSES. 399 canons or monks, whom he brought home and settled in Galloway. 2. HOLYWOOD, in Galloway, called in Latin, Monasteri- ) in favour of Lord Claud Hamilton, a child of ten years of age, notwithstanding that it is expressed in the bulls of Pope Julius that he was four- teen years old. This Lord Claud was third son to James Duke of Chastleherault, governor of Scotland. He adhered to Queen Mary's interest, and was at the field of Langside in the year 1568, for which he was forfeited : And Paisley, then in the crown's hands, was bestowed by the regent upon Robert son to William Lord Semple, heritable bailie of Paisley, and justiciary of that regality. But Lord Claud being afterwards restored to his fortune, was, in the year 1591, by the favour of King James VI. created Lord Pais- ley. His son, James earl of Abercorn, disponed the abbacy of Paisley in favour of William first Earl of Dundonald, with whose posterity it still remains. 2. FEALE, in Kyle, one of the subdivisions of the shire of Ayr, was a cell or priory depending upon Paisley, and consecrated to the Virgin Mary. The founder thereof is unknown, as also the year of foundation : Our history only remarks, that the prior of this place was one of those who hindered the castle of Dumbarton from being surrendered to the English anno 1544, in opposition to the Earl of Le- nox, then governor of it. 3. CROSSRAGUEL, CROCEREGAL, or CROSRAGMOL, in Carrick, also one of the subdivisions of the shire of Ayr, situate in the parish of Kirkoswald, two miles distant from May bole, was founded by Duncan, son of Gilbert earl of 414 feELIGIOUS HOUSES. Carrick, in the year 1244, as we are informed by the char- tulary of Paisley. There is a charter of King Robert the Bruce to this place, which he calls " Croceragmer, de terra de Dungrelach," given at Berwick the 18th year of his reign ; and a confirmation, by the said king, of all the churches and lands granted to this place by Duncan Neil, (Nigellus,) Robert his father, and Edward the Bruce his brother, Earls of Carrick, dated at Cambuskenneth the 20th July, and the 21st year of his reign. The last abbot of this place was Quintine Kennedy, brother to the Earl of Cas- sillis. The famous George Buchanan had afterwards a con- siderable sum of money paid him yearly out of this abbacy, which gives him occasion, in charters, to design himself " Pensionarius de Crosragmol." Both the temporality and spirituality of this abbey was, by King James VI., in the year 1617, annexed to the bishopric of Dunblane. 4. ICOLMKILL, in the isle of lona or Hye, (Insula Sanc- ti Columbce) near the isle of Mull, in the shire of Argyle, was a famous monastery, founded by St Columba, who coming from Ireland into Britain, in the year 565, to preach the word of God to the provinces of the North Picts, and having converted them, he obtained this island, where he laid the foundations of this monastery, and was himself the first abbot. Bede informs us, that his successors and fol- lowers differed from the church of Rome in the observation of Easter and the clerical tonsure, until the year 716. Usher assures us, that the first inhabitants of this monas- tery were regular canons, (clerici,) which opinion Gabriel Pennotus confirms, by several strong arguments drawn from the books of the taxes or impositions that were laid upon the clergy, and are kept at Rome. The old cloisters being ruined by the several incursions of the Danes, the monas- tery became, in the following years, the dwelling of the Clu- niacenses, who, in the reign of King William, lost all their benefices, " cum cura animarum,"" in Galloway, which were RELIGIOUS HOUSES. 415 bestowed upon the canons of Holyroodhouse at Edinburgh , the Benedictines not being allowed by their constitutions to perform the duties and functions of a curate. Forty-eight of our kings are said to have been buried in the church- yard of this abbey, as also four Irish kings, together with eight Danish or Norwegian, whereof there are yet several undefaced monuments and inscriptions extant. This abbey was annexed to the bishopric of Argyle by King James VI. in the year 1617. CHAP. IX. OF THE CISTERTIANS, OR BERNARDINES, AND THEIR MONASTERIES. THE Cistertians were a religious order, begun by Ro- bert abbot of Molesme, in the diocese of Langres hi France, in the year 1098. These monks were called Monachi Alb'i^ White Monks, for distinguishing them from the Benedic- tines, whose habit was entirely black ; whereas the Cister- tians wore a black cowl and scapular, and all their other clothes were white. They were named Cistertians from their chief house and first monasteries, Cistertium in Bur- gundy, and Bernardines, because St Bernard, native of Burgundy, fifteen years after the foundation of the mon- astery of Citeaux, went thither with thirty of his compan- ions, and behaved himself so well to their humour that he was sometime after elected abbot of Clairvaux, {Abbas Clarevallensis.) This Bernard founded above 160 mona- steries of his order ; and because he was so great a propa- gator of it, the monks were called from his name Bernar- dines. They were divided into thirty provinces, whereof Scotland was the twenty-sixth, and had thirteen monas- teries in this country, situate at the following places : 1. MELROSE, in the shire of Teviotdale, situate upon the river Tweed, was an old monastery in the time of the Sax- 416 RELIGIOUS HOUSES. ons, mentioned by Bede, in the year 664. Here St David, finding the former monastery decayed, laid the 'foundation of a new building, which he bestowed upon the Cistertians whom he brought from Rievalle, an abbey in Yorkshire. This new monastery was founded in the year 1136, accord- ing to the Extracta ex variis Chronicis Scotiae, which re- lates it in the following words : * Monasterium de Melross * idem Rex David fundavit, anno Dom. MCXXXVI, de cujus ' quidem fundatione habentur hsec metra : 4 Anno milleno centeno ter quoque deno * Et sexto Christi, Melross fundata fuisti.'' It was dedicated to the Virgin Mary, as all the other houses of this order were, which I shall not repeat. Hugh Giffard Lord Yester, grants the monk-lands of ' Yester, et unum ' toftum in villa sua de Yester, et duas bovatas terrae in villa 6 sua praedicta 1 ; and William, first Earl of Douglas, grants likewise the patronage of the church of Cavers to this ab- bacy, which was one of the finest Gothic buildings in Eu- rope, and a good part of it still remains entire. Several abbots of this place were distinguished for their piety and learning. Richard, the first abbot hereof, died at Clairvaux in the year 1149, " non sine sanctitatis opi- nione." St Walter, second abbot of this place, who died in August 1159j was afterwards canonized. Adam, also abbot of this house, was sent ambassador to King John of Eng- land in the year 1209- He was chosen bishop of Caithness in the year 1213, and was burnt in his kitchen at Hawkirk in the year 1231. Robert of Kildalach, formerly a monk and abbot of Dunfermline, thereafter chancellor of Scotland, was made abbot of this place in the year 1269, and died in the year 1273. Johanness Fogo, abbot also of this monas- tery, was confessor to King James I. ; and Andrew Hunter, abbot of this plaee, was confessor to King James II. and lord high-treasurer in the year 1449- About the time of the Reformation, James Douglas was commendator of Mel- rose, by whose care and industry all the original evidences RELIGIOUS HOUSES. 417 were preserved, and are still extant, in the custody (as I am informed) of the Earl of Morton. Thomas Lord Binny was created Earl of Melrose the 20th of March 1619. 2. NEWBOTTLE, situated on the river of Southesk in the shire of Mid-Lothian, was an abbey founded by King Da- vid I. in the year 1140. The monks hereof were brought from Melrose, together with their abbot Radulphus. Pa- trick Madort, a learned divine, who is mentioned from the year 1462 until the year 1470, recovered a great number of original writs and charters belonging to this place, which were transcribed into a chartulary which is now in the Ad- vocates Library. The last abbot or commendator of this place was Mark Ker, a son of Sir Walter Ker of Cessford; whose son of the same name got this abbacy erected in his favours into a temporal lordship, 15th October 1591, and is ancestor to the present Marquis of Lothian. 3. DUNDRENAN, an abbey situate on Solway Frith, about two miles from Kirkcudbright in Galloway, was founded by Fergus lord of Galloway, in the year 1142. The monks hereof were brought from Rievall in England. Sylvanus was the first abbot of this place. He died at Belleland, " 7 mo Id. Octobris anrto 1189." The last abbot hereof was Edward Maxwell, son to John LordHerries, after whose death King James VI. annexed this place to his royal chapel of Stirling. The Chronicle of Melrose is thought to have been written by an abbot of this monastery. The first part the reof is certainly penned by an Englishman, and is a continuation of Bede's History. The second part appears to have been written by a Scotsman, familiar and contemporary with our Stuarts. The Oxford edition, published in the year 1684, does not agree with our manuscripts. Alan lord of Galloway, surnamed the Great, constable of Scotland, was buried in this place in the year 1233. 4. HOLME, or HOLMCULTRAM, sometimes designed Hare- hope, near to the sea, and about twelve miles distant from Carlisle in Cumberland, was founded by Henry earl of D D 418 RELIGIOUS HOUSES. Huntington, " 3* Kal. Januarii, anno 1150." The first charter granted to this place may be seen in Dugdale^s Monasticon Angllcanum, Part I. p. 886, and the confir- mations made thereof by King David, Malcolm IV. and King William, are likewise to he seen in the said Monas- tics, Vol. III. p. 34 et 38. Robert the Bruce, Earl of Carrick, and father to our Robert I. was here buried, and near to him the bowels of Edward Langshanks, who died at Burgh upon Sand, in his expedition against King Robert the Bruce. The rolls of Robert II. make mention, that the monks of this abbacy were forfeited for adhering to the English interest ; and the lands of Priestfield, the Grange near Edinburgh, and Spittleton, belonging to them, were given to John Lord Kyle, Earl of Carrick, his son, who dis- poned them to Riccarton, nephew to Cardinal Wardlaw bi- shop of Glasgow.' 5. KYNLOSS, or rather KEAXLOCH, in Moray, was a fa- mous abbey, founded by St David, " 12 mo Kal. Januarii, anno 1150." This monastery derives its name from the si- tuation, being placed at the head of a little loch or inlet of the sea, at the mouth of the river of Findorn : For kean, in the old language, signifies the head, and loch, a lake. Nevertheless Dempster, following the old and popular tra- dition, calls it Killoss, and gives us the following account of it, and reason of its foundation : * Killoss, in Moravia, ' nomen habet a floribus, qui, praeter anni naturam, de re- * pente vicino in campo pullularent, dum Duffi Regis cor- 4 pus revelaretur. Ccenobium, post duo fere secula quam * Duffus occubuit, fundatum in memoriam miraculi quod * ibidem contigisse memoratur. 1 Boethius, speaking of this place, informs us, that there was a bridge upon the water, under which King Duffus was concealed ; and that the vil- lage at the end of the bridge was called Kilfloss, i. e. Tern- plum Jlorum ; and, pursuing the story, he adds, ' Nunc ibi 4 coenobium est, cum amplissimo templo, Divae Virgini sa- ( cro, atque augustissimo, aedibusque magnificae structurae RELIGIOUS HOUSES. 419 * piorum coetu Cistertiensis instituti insigne, nulli in Albione ' religionis observatione secundum.' The first abbot of this place was Ascelinus, who, toge- ther with the monks, was brought from Melrose. He died in the year 1174, and was succeeded by Reinerius, who is mentioned as a witness in a charter granted by King Wil- liam to Richard bishop of Moray, of his bishopric, and of the church of Elgin, &c. This Reinerius was publicly in- voked and called upon by the pilgrims and those that fre- quented the public roads. The reason why they reposed so much trust in him is related by Dr Dempster in the follow- ing words : ' Eo quod duos viatores, ad loca sanctiora Sco- * tiae peregrinantes, occissos, seu mutuo conflictu, sive via- * rum obsessoribus, ad vitam revocaverit ; quare (adds he) ' peregrini per Scotiam eum invocabant.' Robert Red, ab- bot of this place, was official of Moray in the year 1530, commendator of Beaulieu in the 1535, bishop of Orkney in the 1557, and president of the Session. He was employed in divers negociations at the courts of Rome, France, and England ; and he died at Dieppe in Normandy, the 15th September 1558, in his return from France, where he had been assisting at the marriage of Queen Mary with the Dauphin. He is much commended by Archbishop Spotis- wood for his integrity and care in the administration of jus- tice. Mr Edward Bruce, commissary of Edinburgh, afterwards a lord of the Session, was commendator of this place at the Reformation, and in the Parliament made a long and learned discourse, shewing the right that prelates had to sit and vote for the Church in the House. He was created by King James VI. Baron Bruce of Kinloss, by letters-patent, bear- ing date 8th July 1604, which dignity of a temporal lord- ship was enjoyed by his son Thomas Bruce, who, by King Charles I. was created Earl of Elgin the 19th June 1633. 6. COUPAR, in Angus, was an abbey founded by King Malcolm IV. and endowed with considerable revenues. 420 RELIGIOUS HOUSES. Matthew Paris will have it to have been founded the year after the council of Tours, and consequently in the year 1164? ; for that council was held 12 m< > Kal. Junii, anno 1163 : And Angelus Manriquez, the historian of the Cis- terian order, and the author of the Bool; of Coi/par, who was certainly well informed of what passed among us, says, in the Life of King Malcolm, anno 1164, ' de consilio 4 Sancti Walthei, abbatis de Melross, Rex Malcolmus fun- ' davit monasterium de Cupro in Angus. 1 Boethius, des- cribing this abbey, (Lib. 13. fol. 279.) says, < Ea est ' abbacia Divae Virgini sacra, amplissimis dotata redditibus. * Inhabitant earn viri religiosi ordinis Cistertii, multa pie- ' tate celebres, nee in hunc usque diem ullo notati manifes- ' to flagitio. 1 The Hays of Errol, next to our kings, were the princi- pal benefactors to this monastery. For William de Haya grants thereto the lands of Lidderpole or Ederpole. His gift is confirmed by King William the Lyon, " apud Streve- lin." David de Haya, his son, grants also, * pro anima ' Wilhelmi patris sui, et Elenae sponsae suae, cum consen- ' su Guilberti heredis sui, unum rete super aquam de Thei,' with tliree acres of arable ground. " Guilbert de Haya, miles, Dominus de Errol,"" grants to the monks of this place, ' liberum transitum, fine impedimento, cum bobus * suis, super terras suas, per omnes vias et semitas. 1 " Ni- colaus de Haya 11 confirms to them ' illam bovatain terrae ' in Carso, quam habent ex dono Rogeri filii Baudrici, una ' cum illo annuo redditu quern dicti Monachi sibi reddere ' solebant. 1 And " Gilbertus de Haya, Dominus de Errol," constable of Scotland, grants to this monastery, 4 in quo ' progenitores sui sepulti erant, et ipse etiam elegeret sepe- c liri, jus patronatus Ecclesiae de Errol, et capellae de Inch- ' martin, cum earum juribus et pertinentiis. 1 This gift is confirmed by Pope Clement, " apud villam novam Ave- nionensis diocesis, 4to Kal. Aprilis, pontificatus sui anno nono. 11 The original bull is still extant amongst our pub- RELIGIOUS HOUSES. 421 lie records in the Laigh Parliament-house. After the Re- formation, King James VI. created a second son of Secre- tary Elphinston Lord Coupar, the 20th December 1607 ; but he dying without issue, in the year 1669, the honour devolved to my Lord Balmerino. 7. GLENLUCE, or Vallls lucis, in Galloway, gives name to a considerable bay in that country, and was an abbey, founded in the year 1190, by Holland lord of Galloway and constable of Scotland. The monks of this monastery were brought from Melrose. Walter, abbot of this place, was sent to Scotland by John duke of Albany. Laurence Gordon, son to Alexander bishop of Galloway, and arch- bishop of Athens, was likewise an abbot of this place. King James VI. erected in his favours Glenluce into a tem- porality in the year 1602, which was confirmed by act of Parliament 1606. After his death, John Gordon, dean of Salisbury, son to the said bishop, fell to be Lord Glenluce, and disponed the lordship to Sir Robert Gordon, his son- in-law. Afterwards Glenluce was united to the bishopric of Galloway by act of Parliament ; and at length Sir James Dalrymple, president of the Session, a gentleman of an an- cient family in Carrick, was created Lord Glenluce. His son, Sir John Dalrymple, king's advocate, justice-clerk, and secretary of State, was likewise Lord Glenluce and Earl of Stair. 8. SAUNDLE, SANADALE, or SADAEL, and SADAGAL, in the Register of Pensions, in Cantyre, formerly a shire by itself, but now united to the shire of Argyle, was an abbey, founded by Reginaldus, son of Somerled lord of the Isles, who was defeated and slain at Renfrew in the 1164, in his rebellion against King Malcolm IV., although all our his- torians say it was founded by one Sorle Maclardy, which seems to be a corruption for Soirle Mackilvrid or Somerled, the son of Gilbrid, who was father to the above Reginald, 9 O 7 ancestor to the Macdonalds. The founder mortified there- unto the lands of Glensaddil and Baltebean, together witli 422 RELIGIOUS HOUSES. the lands of Casken in the isle of Arran. Sir Duncan Campbell of Lochow, who was created Lord Campbell in the year 1445, mortifies also to this abbacy the lands of Blairantibert in the shire of Argyle, " pro salute animae suae," &c. Dempster mentions one Thomas abbot of Saun- dle, who flourished about the year 1257. He commends him for the austerity of his life and chastity, and calls him " Vir magna vitae austeritate, et continentia Celebris."" He informs us, likewise, that he wrote several books, which were kept in the library of St Andrews ; but at present there are none to be found in that place penned by his hand. King James IV, annexed this abbacy to the bishop, ric of Argyle in the year 1507. 9. CULROSS, or KYLLENROSS, situated upon the Frith of Forth, in the shire of Perth and diocese of Dunblane, was an abbey, founded in the year 1217, by Malcolm earl of Fife The church of this place was dedicated, not only to the Virgin Mary, but also to St Serf, the confessor, \_Sanc- tus Servanus^ whose festival was kept yearly upon the first day of July. The Chronicle of Melrose gives us an ac- count of the foundation of this monastery in the following words : * Fundata est abbacia de Kulinross a Domino * Malcomo Comite de Fife, ad quam abbaciam missus est * conventus, 7 mo Kal. Martii, de Kinlos, cum Domino Hu- ' goneprimo abbate, quondam priore de Kinlos. 1 John Hog was abbot of this place 14th April 1484, at which time Culross was erected into a burgh of barony. The last abbot of this place was Alexander, son to Sir James Colvil of Ochil- trie. Sir James Colvil, brother to the said Alexander, was raised to the dignity of Lord Colvil of Culross, in the year 1604, at which time the king made him a grant of this dis- solved abbey. 10. DEER, in Buchan, situate upon the water of Ugie, half a mile distant from Old Deer, was an abbey, founded by William Cuming earl of Buchan, who gave thereunto a great many lands in those parts, and bestowed it upon RELIGIOUS HOUSES. 423 this order of monks in the year 1218, who were brought to this place 'from Kinloss. The first abbot of this mo- nastery was one Alexander prior of Kinloss, who died 8 TO Id. Septembris anno 1233, while he was going to Citeaux in France to assist at the general chapter, and was buried in a monastery of the same order, called " Vallis Sanctae Mariae." He was succeeded in the 1234 by Herbertus ab- bot of Coupar. The last abbot of this monastery was Ro- bert Keith, brother to the Earl Marischal ; of whom Demp- ster gives the following account : ' Robertus Keithus, Co- mitis Martialis frater, eruditione et vitae continentia cla- * rus, abbas Deerensis, multa egisse dicitur, quo collapsos 1 Ecclesiastic! ordinis mores restitueret, nonnulla scripsit : ' obiit Lutetiae 12 ma die Junii anno 1551, sepultus in aede * sacra Carmelitarum, ante aram Sancti Niniani. 1 There is another eulogium of this abbot, which says that he was bu- ried at Paris, ' in fano Carmelitarum, juxta forum Sancti * Mauberti,' with this epitaph, ' Cy gist venerable prelat * Robert Keith, Escossois, frere du Conte Marischal, abbe * du monastere de Dier, qui trepassa 12 m Juin 1551.' The said Dempster speaks of one Samuel prior of Deer, during the time that the foresaid abbot was alive ; of whom he gives the following account : 4 Samuel Deiranus prior, ' vir ad miraculum omnibus bonis artibus eruditus, praeci- 4 pue mathematicis,- in quibus tantum excelluit, ut vulgo * Magus haberetur, varia reliquit ingenii monumenta : obiit ' anno 1567, sepultusque est in sacello Divi Mathaei Ros- ' selini, non longe ab Edinburgo.' Afterwards another Ro- bert Keith, son to William Earl Marischal, was, by the fa- vour of King James VI. created a temporal lord hereof, by the stile and title of Lord Altrie. He left only one daugh- ter ; so the peerage failed in him, and his estate and honours fell to George Earl Marischal. 11. BALMERINACH, in Fife, called by Lesly Balmurae- um, and by Fordun Habitaculum ad mare, was an abbey, of a beautiful structure, begun by King Alexander II. and 424" RELIGIOUS HOUSES. his mother Emergarda, daughter to the Earl of Beaumont, in the year 1229. Tjjis lady bought the lands of Balmeri- nach, and paid therefore 1000 merks Sterling to Richard de Reule, son of Henry, who resigned Balmerinach, Cul- trach, and Balandean, " in curia Regis Alexandri, apud Forfar, die post festum Sancti Dionysii,"" anno 1215; upon which ground Emergarda founded this monastery ; which was of old a stately building, pleasantly situate near the shore, hard by the salt water of Tay, and is now for the most part in ruins. The monks of this place, which was dedicated to St Edward as well as the Virgin Mary, were brought from Melrose. David de Lindsay gives them an annuity out of his mill of Kirkhuet, which was confirmed by King Alexander II. in the 1233. Symon, " filius et heres Symonis de Kinmr,"" grants them, " in eleemosynam, medietatem totius terrae suae in feudo de Kinnir, r) which is now called Little Kinnir. His charter was confirmed by the said King Alexander, " 21 mo Septembris, anno regni sui 22 do ." The preceptory of Gad- van, near Dinbug in Fife, with the house and lands, be- longed also to this abbey ; and two or three monks of their order constantly resided in that place. " Laurentius de Abernethie," son of Orm, gave Corbie, called also Birkhill, from a park of birks surrounding the house, to this monastery ; and in his charter is expressed the reason of his donation, viz. because Queen Emergarda dying " 3 tio Id. Februarii, anno 1233," and being buried in the church of Balmerinach, " ante magnum altare," had by her testament left him 200 merks Sterling. After the Reformation, King James VI. erected Balme- rinach into a temporal lordship, in favours of Sir James Elphinston of Barnton, principal secretary of State, the 20th April 1604. He had likewise been a lord of the Session, and president after the Lord Fyvie, 12. SWEETHEART, (Abbacia Dulcis-cordis,) in Galloway, called by Lesly Suavi-cordium, was an abbey, founded in RELIGIOUS HOUSES. 425 the thirteenth century, by Dervorgilla, daughter to Alan lord of Galloway, niece to David earl of Huntington, and spouse to John Baliol, lord of Castlebernard, who died in the year 1269, and was here buried. Andrew Winton, prior of Lochleven, informs us, that after his death his la- dy caused take out his heart, and spice and embalm it, and putting it in a box of ivory, bound with silver, and enamel- led, closed it solemnly in the walls of the church, near to the high altar ; from whence it had the name of Sweet- heart, which was afterwards changed into thatof New Abbey. The first abbot of this place was Henry, who died in his journey to Citeaux in the year 1219. He was succeeded by " Ericus magister Conversorum ejusdem domus." Af- terwards, John abbot of this place swears fealty to Edward Langshanks in the 1296, according to Prynne, p. 552, and he is there designed " Johan abbe de Doux-quer." There is a charter by another John abbot of this place, dated at New Abbey, the 23d October 1528, and granting Cuthberto ' Broun de Cairn, in emphyteosim, totas et integras qua- * tuor mercatas terrarum de CorbuUy, in baronia sua de Lo- ' kendolo, infra senescallatum de Kirkcudbright ; redden- 4 do annuatim summam octo mercarum usualis monetae ' regni Scotiae, ad duos anni terminos, viz. Pentecostes, et * Sancti Martini in hyeme.' Gilbert Brown, descended of the family of Garsluith, is among the monks that assent thereto. He was the last ab- bot of this abbey. Calderwood, in his History informs us that he sat in Parliament the 17th August 1560, whilst the Confession of Faith was approved ; and in the 1 605, he was apprehended by the Lord Cranston, captain of the guards appointed for the borders, and was sent to Black- ness, and after some days was transported to the castle of Edinburgh, where he was kept until his departure out of the kingdom. He died at Paris, 14th May 1612. Sir Ro- bert Spotiswood, president of the Session, and secretary of 426 RELIGIOUS HOUSES. State to King Charles I. was designed Lord New-Abbey, being then in possession of this dissolved abbey. 13. MACHLINE, in Kyle, a district of the shire of Ayr, said to be founded by King David I. The charter of foundation is related in that chartulary of Melrose which was not long since in the hands of the Earl of Haddington : Although by another chartulary of Melrose, yet extant in the Advocates Library, it would rather appear that it was the Stuarts who founded Machline, and bestowed it upon Melrose ; for we have in that chartulary (fol. vers. 27.) a confirmation by King Alexander II. of the grant of Mach- line, made by Walter, son of Alan Lord High-steward of Scotland, to the abbacy of Melrose ; and another of King Alexander III. confirming the gift of Alexander Lord High-steward of Scotland, of Machline, to the said abbacy. In all which charters it seems to be acknowledged, that Machline was given by the Stuarts to Melrose, and not by King David, else he would be named as founder of this abbacy. CHAP. X. OF THE MONKS OF VALLIS-CAULIUM AND THEIR MONAS- TERIES. THE monks of this order of Vallis-caulium, Vallis-olerum y or Val-des-cliouX) are so named from the first priory of that congregation, which was founded by Virard, in the diocese of Langres, betwixt Dijon and Autun in Burgundy, in the year 1193. They are a Reform of the Cistertians, and fol- low the rule of St Bennet. By their constitutions they were obliged to live an austere and solitary life, none but the prior and procurator being allowed to go out of the cloisters for any reason whatsoever. They were brought to Scot- land by William Malvoisin \de malo vicino,] bishop of St Andrews, in the year 1230, and had three monasteries amongst us, situate at the following places, viz. RELIGIOUS HOUSES. 427 1. PLUSCARDIN, in Moray, situated about six miles above Elgin, on the north side of the river Lochty, which falls into the Lossie at Pittendrich, was a rich priory, founded in honour of St Andrew, by King Alexander II. in the year 1230, and named " Vallis Sancti Andreae." Dempster fancies that it belonged formerly to the knights of St John of Jerusalem, though without the least foundation for that assertion. Others, who confound the religious of Vallis- caulium with the Camalduluins, will have it to have been a priory of that congregation ; whereas the Camaldulians, established by John Gualbert, a Florentine, in a place called Vallis Umbrosa, near the Appennine hills in Italy, in die year 1040, were properly hermits, and of a different order from those of Valliscaulium, who were not established till the year 1193, as is related above. King Robert the Bruce grants to this place a fishing on the river Spey ; and Simon, prior of Pluscardin, is witness to a charter of Andrew bishop of Moray, dated the 30th December 1239. Hector Foreman, a monk of tin's place, is likewise witness to a donation of Gavin Dunbar, made to his cathedral of Aberdeen, of 50 merks out of the Quarrel- wood in the shire of Elgin, the 28th September 1529- It is commonly reported that the famous book of Pluscardin, seen and perused by George Buchanan, was penned here ; but there are some who, with greater probability, take it to have been only a copy of Fordun belonging to this monas- tery. The constitutions of the order at the beginning were here strictly observed ; but the monks afterwards becoming vicious, the monastery was reformed, and became a cell sub- ject to Dunfermline. At the dissolution of the monasteries, this rich priory was bestowed by King James VI. upon Sir Alexander Seton, who was afterwards created Earl of Dun- fermline. 2. BEAULIEU, now BEWLY in Ross, (Prwratus de Betto- Zoco,) was founded in the year 1230, by James Bisset, a gentleman of a considerable estate in that shire. The 428 RELIGIOUS HOUSES. terms of its foundation were, ' ut pro ipso, dum viveret, * orarent monachi ; post mortem, funus corpusque excipe- ' rent, atque animam de corpore abeuntem, per continua ' sacrificia et opera pietatis prosequerentur.' His charter is confirmed by Pope Gregory, " Stio Non. Julii, pontifica- tus, anno 4 to ." Andrew bishop of Moray ratifies to the monks of Beau- lieu their tithes and fishing upon Spey, as also the teind- sheaves of the parish of Abertarf, granted formerly to them by William Bisset, knight. His charter is subscribed by fifteen canons of the church of Moray. The church of Conwath belonged also to this place. Robert Reid, bishop of Orkney, was commendator hereof in the year 1535. Af- ter the Reformation, Walter, abbot of Kinloss and prior of Beaulieu, gives a tack of some lands belonging to the mo- nastery to John and Alexander Clerks, dated the 19th No- vember 1568. At the dissolution of the monasteries, Hugh Lord Fraser of Lovat acquired this priory from the last prior thereof, and transmitted it to his posterity, with whom it still remains. 3. ARDCHATTAN, situated on the north side of Loch Etyf in Lorn, a subdivision of the shire of Argyle, was a prior)', founded in the year 1230 by Duncan Mackoul, ancestor (as is commonly said) to the Macdougals of Lorn. Peter, prior of this place, is one of the subscribers to Ragmaii's- rott in the year 1296. There is a commission, dated the 7th May 1506, and addressed to the prior of Beaulieu, from James, prior or general of this order, empowering him to visit Ardchattan, and to make such regulations there as he shall find requisite for observing the rule and constitution of the order.* The proprietor of this place is to this day by the country people called prior of Ardchattan, and there are some remains of this old monastery yet extant. It was annexed to the bishopric of Argyle by King James VI. in the year 1617. * John Campbell, prior, became bishop of the Isles anno 1573. RELIGIOUS HOUSES. 429 CHAP. XI. OF THE CARTHUSIANS. THESE monks were established by Bruno, a doctor of Paris, and a canon of Rheims, in tlie year 1086, in the wild mountains of Grenoble in France, under the protection of the Virgin Mary and St John the Baptist. The reason of his retreat is reputed to have proceeded from the following accident, which fell out during the funeral service for Ray- mond Dion, a professor of the university of Paris, who had been in very great esteem, not only for his doctrine, but also for the apparent integrity of a good life ; but (as the story goes) the dead corpse all on a sudden sat upright in the bier, and cried with a lamentable voice, " Justo Dei judicio condemnatus sum.'" These words it uttered three several days. Bruno being present at this sight, and taking occasion, from the strangeness of the thing, to make a se- rious discourse to the assembly, he concluded that it was impossible for them to be saved unless they renounced the world and retired into desarts. Hereupon he, with six of his scholars, retired to the Carthusian mountains in Dau- phiny, where he was assisted with all things by the bishop of that place, named Hugo, who afterwards became one of his disciples. They built in that desart little cells, at some distance each from another, where they lived in silence. They proposed to follow the rule of St Bennet, adding hereto several other great austerities. They came into Eng- land in the year 1180, and from thence into Scotland in the year 1429. They had only one establishment among us, situated near Perth, called " Monasterium Vallis Virtutis," which King James I. founded after his captivity in Eng- land, according to the following Monkish verses : 430 RELIGIOUS HOUSES. " Annus millenus vicenus sicque novenus Quadringentenus Scotis fert munera plenus : Semina florum, germina morum, mystica mclla, Cum tibi Scotia fit Carthusia sponsa novella." * Oswald de Corda, vicar of the great Charterhouse near Grenoble, was the first superior of this place. He died " Kal. Octobris anno 1434," and was succeeded by Adam de Hangleside, a Scotsman. The building was of a very fine structure^ and the monks had large revenues belonging to them. Adam Foreman, last prior of the Charterhouse near Perth, when his house was demolished by the reform- ers, retired, together with his brethren, to Errol, of which church they were patrons ; and there he feued out, with consent of those that staid at home, to John Foreman, son and heir to Robert Foreman of Luthre, for a sum of money, * terras suas de sacello beatae Marias Magdalenae, (the * Magdalene's lands,) nuncupates terras de Frierton, terras * de Craigy, et insulam australem burgi de Perth, una cum * piscaria sua salmonum super aqua de Taye, infra viceco- * mitatum de Perth. 1 King James VI. afterwards con- firmed to James Moncrief, ' secundum tenorem cartae feu- ' difirmae, 1 given by the prior and convent of the Charter- house of Perth to John Moncrief, the 14th November 1569, 4 locum, domum, totas .et integras terras, cum pomeriis, 4 hortis, uno vel pluribus, de Charterhouse, fundum ac * stagnum, et aggeres ejusdem, cum decimis suis inclusis, * infra bondas ex antiqua consuetudine limitatas ; et duo ' tenementa in burgo, cum hortis, et reliqua extra burgum ; ' sal vis et reservatis sibi et successoribus suis, juribus, servi- ' tiis, et precibus, sibi et successoribus suis debitis et con- * suetis.' This charter is dated at Leith, the 18th of May 1572, and the 5th year of his reign. He created George Hay of NethirlyfF commendator of the priory of the Char- terhouse near Perth, * toto conventu ejusdem longo tem- * pore praeterito defuncto, ;"* granting him ( prioratum prae- RELIGIOUS HOUSES. 431 * dictum, et beneficium ejusdem, una cum omnibus et sin- * gulis ecclesiis, decimis garbalibus, aliisque decimis, ad hu- * jusmodi prioratum spectantibus, seu juste spectare valen- * tibus ; ac cum principal! maneriae loco, domibus, aedificiis, ' hortis et pomeriis, infra praecinctum et claXisuram monas- * terii de Charterhouse ; nee non cum voto et loco in om- ' nibus Parliamentis, conciliis et conventionibus, ac omnibus * dignitatibus, praeeminentiis, honoribus, immunitatibus, et * privilegiis quibuscunque, ad dictum prioratum, benefi- ' cium et dignitatem ejusdem, spectantibus, per praefatum ' Georgium, priorem praedictum, gaudendis, utendis, et * possidendis, in omnibus punctis, ut congruit, omni tempore * a future." 1 This patent is given at Holyroodhouse ; and, to support his dignity, the king grants him, by another charter, dated from the same place, the 1st of February 1598, and of his reign the 32d year, { omnes et singulas * terras ecclesiasticas de Enrol, cum mansione, domibus, hor- ' tis, earundem, et omnibus suis pertinentiis, una cum decimis * garbalibus, aliisque decimis earundem inclusis, quae a solo * nunquam separari solebant, infra parochiam de Errol,' &c. Nevertheless, the said George Hay, finding the rents too small to support the dignity of a lord, returned back to the King his peerage, and resigned his title of lord in his Ma- jesty's hands, reserving to himself and his heirs the patron- age of the church of Errol ; which resignation, with the re- servation, were accepted of by his Majesty, and so the name of Lord and Prior of the Charterhouse of Perth be- came extinct. These monks wore a white gown, with a scapular and capuchin of the same colour. They ate constantly in pri- vate, except on the festival days, when they were allowed to eat together in the same refectory. They wore next their skin a cilicium or cloth of hair. They observed a constant silence, and never went out of the cloister, the prior and procurator being only excepted. The laick bro- thers, who wore a shorter robe and beards for distinction, 432 RELIGIOUS HOUSES. were separated from the prior and his brethren in the church, and sat in the outer part thereof, called navis eccle- slae ; as also no women were allowed to enter their houses and churches. There were several alterations made in their constitutions, but none in the preceding points which I have noticed, and were exactly observed at Perth as they are at this day abroad. CHAP. XII. OF THE GILBERTINES. I shall join here, to what account I have given of the canons and monks, the religious of Simpringham or Gilber- tines. This order was established by one Gilbert, who was born in the reign of William the Conqueror. His father was a gentleman of Normandy, lord of Simpringham and Tyrington in Lincolnshire, and his mother an English lady. After he had ended his studies in France, he returned home, and was ordained priest by the bishop of Lincoln. Having received holy orders, he spent all his substance and patrimony on the poor and in actions of piety, and took a particular care of distressed girls, who were ashamed to make known to the world their poverty and condition. Of this number he shut up seven in a monastery which he had built at Simpringham in the year 1146. He gave them servants, who prepared their victuals without doors, and de- livered them what was prepared through a window. Their life and conversation was so exemplary that many ladies em- braced their way of living. This occasioned Gilbert to build new cloisters ; and the Cistertians, whom he was de- sirous to have for their directors, refusing that officej he called some canon-regulars, who undertook it ; so that by this means their monasteries became double, that is to say, composed both of men and women, who dwelt under the RELIGIOUS HOUSES. 433 same roof, but in different apartments. He prescribed to the canons the rule of St Augustine, and to the nuns that of St Bennet, with some private constitutions, which were approved by the Popes Eugenius III. Adrian IV. and Alex- ander III. According to these rules, a nun was not allowed to speak at the grate unless four witnesses w r ere present. At the Reformation, this Institute had twenty-one houses in England, of which Simpringham was the head, where their general chapters were held yearly ; the Superior of every house assisting at the assembly, with a professed sister of the quire and a converse, who had a vote at their meeting, the Superior of the canons being likewise present, but his laick brother had no vote. We had only one monastery of this Order in Scotland, viz. at Dalmullin, situate upon the river of Ayr, in the shire of the same name, and founded by Walter third Lord High- steward of Scotland ; the nuns and canons whereof were brought from Syxle in Yorkshire, to whom the said Walter gave three merks of annual-rent, ' redditum trium merca- ' rum argenti, et totam terrain de Mems,"* as appears by the chartulary of Paisley. His charter is confirmed by King Alexander II. ' apud Air, 28 VO die Maii, anno reg- *ni sui IB 10 ,' i. e. anno 1230. The said " Walterus filius Alani, Domini Regis Scotiae Senescallus," grants like- wise, ' Beatae Mariae, et conventui canonicorum et mo- ' nialium de Dalmullin super Air, qui sunt de ordine de * Simpringham, ecclesiam de Dundonald, cum capella de ' Crosby et Riccarton, et ecclesiam de Sanchar.' He grants also to the said church ' terrain et pasturam de ' Drumley et Swinshall, et ecclesiam de Auchinleck,' as appears by several charters still extant in the chartulary of Paisley. All these donations are confirmed by his son Alexander Lord High-steward of Scotland, and by William bishop of Glasgow, ' apud Glasgow, die Sabbati proximo ' post nativitatem Beatae Mariae Yirginis, anno Gratiae 4 1239;' and also by Pope Innocent, at * Assise, 4 to Id. E e 434 RELIGIOUS HOUSES. ' Mail, pontificatus sui anno lOn .' Thereafter the monks and nuns not agreeing with the air of our country, they re- turned back into England ; whereupon all their rents were disponed by the said Walter to the monastery of Paisley ; who gives ' redditus in terris, molendinis, pasturis, pisca- ' riis, et aliis bonis quae canonibus et monialibus de Sim- ' pringham prius contulimus, et quae ipsi postmodum re- ' signaverunt sua voluntate spontanea.' The canons wore a white gown, made of lambskins, with a cowl sewed to their habit, and lined also with lambskins. The nuns wore likewise a white gown, and their veils were also lined with a lambskin. They observed a constant silence in the cloister, and were not admitted to their novi- tiate till they were fifteen years of age, and could not be professed unless they had perfectly by heart the psalms, hymns, and antiphona that were sung during divine ser- vice. By the same constitutions, the canons were not al- lowed to enter the apartments of the nuns unless to confess or administrate to them the sacraments while they were sick. The buildings, or rather the ruins, of this monastery subsisted (as I am informed) not long ago. CHAP. XIII. OF THE TEMPLAES. THERE were likewise among us two orders of religious knights, one of which was the Templars, or Red Friars, established at Jerusalem, in the year 1118, by " Hugo de Paganis" and " Gaufridus de Sancto Aldemaro." 1 Baldwin II. king of Jerusalem, gave them a dwelling near the tem- ple of that city, from whence they were called Templars. They followed the rule of St Augustine, and the constitu- tions of the canon-regulars of Jerusalem ; their office and vow being to defend the temple and city of Jerusalem, to RELIGIOUS HOUSES. 435 entertain Christian strangers and pilgrims charitably, and guard them safely through the Holy Land. There was one general prior that had the government of this Order in Scotland and in England. They came into Scotland in the reign of King David I. ; for the book of Coupar says, * Sanctus David de praeclara militia templi Hierosolomi- ' tani, optimos fratres secum retinens, eos diebus et nocti- * bus morum suorum fecit esse custodes.' This order was very rich, and had above 9000 houses in Christendom ; and amongst us there was scarce a parish wherein they had not some lands, farms, or houses. In Edinburgh there were a great many buildings belonging to them, as also in Leith. When any of these buildings were feued out to seculars, they had a great care to order the possessors to keep con- stantly the cross of the Order on the top of his house, as a token that they were subject to them, and that he was only liable to answer to their courts. Their principle residences were at The TEMPLE, near the river of Southesk, in Mid-Lo- thian, founded by King David I. BALAN~TRADOCH, near the same river, now called Amis- ton, which is frequently made mention of in the chartulary of Newbottle in the Advocates Library. ABOYNE, in the shire of Aberdeen, was likewise a con- siderable estate and house belonging to this order. M ARYCULTER, in the shire of Kincardine, also was a re- sidence of these knights. OGGERSTOXE, in the shire of Striveling, founded by St David, was a fort and barony belong to these knights. St GERMANS, in East Lothian, belonged also to this or- der, but was, long after its suppression, with most of its re- venues, bestowed by King James IV. upon the King^s college of Aberdeen in the year 1494. TULLOCH, in the shire of Aberdeen, was likewise a resi- dence of these knights. INCHYNAN, in the shire of Renfrew, also belonged to 436 RELIGIOUS HOUSES. them, with several other places in Eskdale and towards the border of England. They wore a white habit, to which Pope Eugenius III. added a red cross of stuff sewed upon their cloaks. This order, being in a general Council, held at Vienne in France by Pope Clement V., suppressed for supposed crimes, in the year 1312, their houses, goods, and substance were given to the knights of St John of Jerusalem. There was some time ago a manuscript, in folio, contain- ing an account of all the lands and feu-duties belonging to this order, in the hands of Patrick Murray of Deuchar. CHAP. XIV, OF THE KNIGHTS OF ST JOHN OF JERUSALEM, OR JOHANNITES. THE Johannites, or Knights of Jerusalem, had their first beginning from certain devout merchants of the city of Melphi in the kingdom of Naples, who, trading to the Holy Land, obtained of the Calif of Egypt a permission to build a church and monastery at Jerusalem, for the reception of the pilgrims that came to visit the Holy Land, and paid yearly a tribute upon that account. Afterwards they built a church in honour of the Virgin Mary, and another conse- crated to the memory of Mary Magdalene, the one being for men and the other for women, who were received there with great demonstrations of charity. When this city was taken by Godfrey of Bouillon, Gerard of Martiques, a na- tive of Provence in France, built there a larger church, with an hospital for the sick and for pilgrims, in the year 1104, in honour of St John, where he placed these knights, who took their names from that hospital. And when Saladin expelled them out of Jerusalem in the year 1187, they re- tired to the fortress of Margat in Phoenicia. Afterwards RELIGIOUS HOUSES. 437 they settled at Acre or Ptolemais ; thence they followed John of Luzignan to Cyprus, from whence they retired to Rhodes. But Rhodes being taken by Solyman the Mag- nificent, emperor of the Turks, in the year 1522, they re- tired to Viterbo in Italy ; and in the year 1534 were placed by the Emperor Charles V. at Malta, where they still re- main, and are called Knights of Malta, which is an island in the Mediterranean sea, not far distant from Sicily. No man can be admitted to this order without making proof of his birth, and justifying by charters, or other authentic docu- ments, his nobility for four generations, both on the father and mother side. He must be born in lawful marriage, the bastards of kings and princes being only excepted. They have constant wars with the Turks, and take the three or- dinary vows of religion, viz. poverty, chastity, and obedi- ence. They wear a black habit, with a cross of gold, hav- ing eight points, enamelled white, in memory of the eight beatitudes. This order was first composed of eight langua- ges or nations ; whereof the grand prior of Provence is great commendator, the prior of Auvergne is great marshal, the prior of the Isle of France is great hospitalier, the great prior of Italy is admiral, the prior of Arragon is great con- servator, the prior of Germany is great bailiff, the prior of Castile is great chancellor, and the prior of England is great Turcopolier, or colonel of the cavalry. Upon the suppression of the Templars, (as is said above,) they got many of their lands. Such were the churches, castles, and tithes of Tullach, Aboyne, Inchynan, Maryculter, with the hospitals of St Germans in Lothian, Balantrodoch, and Kilbartha, with the lands and pertinents. Pope Paschal III. confirmed this order in the year 1113 ; and Pope Pius II. dispensed with the great rigour of their rules, which at first were very severe, mitigating the con- stitutions formed by Raymond de Puy, of an ancient house in Dauphiny. The great master is by his subjects styled Prince of Malta and of Goza, which is a small island in 438 RELIGIOUS HOUSES. the Mediterranean sea, not far distant from Malta : yet in his patents his title is, " by the Grace of God humble Great Master of the Sacred Hospital of St John of Jerusalem, and Warden of the Poor of Jesus Christ. 11 The arms of the order are, gules, a cross argent, which all the knights bear in chief with their paternal coat. The principal dwelling of these knights was at Tor- phichen, in the shire of West-Lothian or Linlithgow, con- secrated to St John, and founded by King David I. King Malcolm IV. gave, ' in liberam et puram eleemosynam, * fratribus hospitalis Hierosolymitani, ummi plenarium ' toftum in quolibet burgo totius terrae suae/" And King Alexander II. confirms, ' Deo et Sancto Johanni, et fratri- ' bus hospitalis de Torphichen, omnes donationes terrarum, * hominum, tenementorum et eleemosynarum, quae iis ra- * tionabiliter factae sunt, tarn in Ecclesiis quam in aliis pos- * sessionibus mundanis, cum sock et sack, cum thol et them,' &c. with other privileges. The charter is dated the 30th June, in the seventeenth year of his reign. There have been several preceptors of Torphichen amongst us that were considerable men. The first I find mentioned is one " Archibaldus Magister de Torphichen," who is witness to a charter of Alexander Great Steward of Scotland in the 1252 : and brother Alexander de Walles, Avarden of the Hospital of Jerusalem in Scotland, swears fealty to King Edward I. in the year 1296, with brother John of Sautry, master of the Knights of the Temple in Scotland. Sir Henry Livingston, descended of the family of Kilsyth, was likewise preceptor of Torphichen, who, dying in the year 1463, was succeeded by Sir William Knows, who in the year 1463 was made Lord High-treasurer, upon the re- moval of Sir David Guthrie of that Ilk, and held that office till the year 1470, at which time Mr John Laing, rector of Tannadice and vicar of Linlithgow, was made treasurer. But upon the accession of King James IV. to RELIGIOUS HOUSES. 439 the throne, he was again constituted treasurer, and was af- terwards made master of the household in place of the Earl of Bothwell. He died at the battle of Flodden 1513, and was succeeded by Sir George Dundas, who was a person of great learning, and a school-fellow of Hector Boethius at Paris, and was chosen preceptor at the appointment of the Duke of Albany, then regent. Walter Lindsay, Lord St John of Jerusalem, and pre- ceptor of Torphichen, called by the King " Dilectus con- sanguineus nosier," grants also a charter to James Dundas of Craigton, and Elizabeth Hamilton, of the lands of Ne- ther- Newliston, dated the 16th February 1533, and confir- med the 8th of June 1543. The last preceptor was Sir James Sandilands, second son to Sir James Sandilands of Calder, who succeeded Sir Wal- ter Lindsay. He, at the Reformation, resigned all the lands of the Johannites in Scotland into Queen Mary's hands, who feued them out again to the said Sir James for 10,000 crowns, and the yearly annuity of 500 merks. She also erected all the foresaid lands into a temporal lordship, in favour of him and his heirs, by a charter under the great seal, dated 24th January 1563. Thereafter Sir James San- dilands disponed all the Temple-lands lying in the shires of Edinburgh, Linlithgow, Stirling, Kincardine, and Aber- deen, in favour of James Tenent of Lynhouse, and Mr Robert Williamson, writer in Edinburgh, for 10,000 merks, reserving to himself, out of this disposition, the lands of Torphichen, Listen, Dennie, Thankerton, Balintrodoch, and Maryculter ; as also his right to the churches of Tor- phichen, Temple, Inchmachan, Maryculter, Aboyne, Tul- loch, and Kilbartha, with the teinds belonging to them : And, sometime thereafter, Tenent and Williamson convey- ed their whole right to Thomas Lord Binny, ancestor to the Earl of Haddington. The Temple-lands, lying within the shires of East-Lo- thian and Fife, were afterwards made over to Mr George 440 RELIGIOUS HOUSES. Lauder of Bass ; those within the sheriffdom of Perth and stewartry of Strathern, to David Lord Scone ; the lands lying within the shires of Dumfries, Lanerk, and Wigton, and the stewartries of Annandale and Kirkcubright, were transferred to Captain William Ross, and from him by pro- gress to Ross of Auchlossin. The same cross with that of the Templars was likewise ordered to be put upon all houses that were feued out by these knights : Whereupon we see to this day a great num- ber of crosses upon the top of several buildings in the cities of Edinburgh and Leith, which belonged formerly to them, and are as yet subject to the jurisdiction of those who ac- quired them at the Reformation. CHAP. XV. OF THE DOMINICANS, OR BLACK FRIARS, AND THEIR MONASTERIES. AFTER having given an account of the canons and knights who professed the rule of St Augustine, I shall proceed to the Mendicants, of which sort there were four different orders, viz. 1. The Dominicans, or Black Friars ; 2. The Franciscans, or Gray Friars ; 3. The Carmelites, or White Friars ; 4. The Heremites of St Augustine, who began under Pope Alexander IV. about the year 1256 ; but of this last there were none amongst us. The Mendicants were distinguished from the monks, in that these last were confined to their cloisters, whereas the others were allowed to preach, and beg their subsistence abroad ; and were distinguished from one another by the colour of their habit. The first of these was the Dominicans, or Black Friars, called also Fratres Prcedicatores, because of their frequent preaching ; who were instituted by St Dominic, first contri- EEL1GIOUS HOUSES. 441 ver of the Inquisition, and descended of the family of the Gusmans in Spain. He was a canon-regular of the cathedral of Osma, and archdean of that church, and became renown- ed by his sermons against the Albigenses, and founded a congregation of preachers, who devoted themselves entirely to the conversion of heretics. He died in the 1221, after his Order had been approved of by Pope Innocent III. in the 1215, and by Honorious III. his successor in the 1216. This Order was afterwards divided into forty-five provinces, whereof Scotland was the eighteenth. They were brought to this country in the reign of King Alexander II. by William Malvoisin, \De malo vicino] bishop of St Andrews, a Frenchman, and had fifteen convents amongst us : 'And notwithstanding they professed poverty, yet, when their nests were pulled down, they were found too rich for men- dicants. The first they had was at, 1. EDINBURGH, founded by King Alexander II. in the year 1230, where they built their convent upon the very same spot of ground where the High-school and steeple stands at present, which in their charters is called Mansio Regis, because formerly it was a dwelling-house belonging to that king : who likewise grants to the said friars a street called at present Black-friars Wynd, ' anno regni sui IT' 00 * ' cum transitu ejusdem qui dicitur Le Venelle, ita quod * dicti fratres, in praedicta platea seu transitu qui dicitur ' Le Venelle, possint, secundum quod videbitur iis expe- ' diens, domos aut aedificia construere seu aedificare. 1 King Robert Bruce, in the twentieth year of his reign, likewise gives them six merks to be paid to them out of his mill of Libberton. They had likewise twenty-four merks paid yearly out of the lands of Gosford, as appears by a charter dated 28th March 1474. Johannes Layng, designed " Clericus et Regis thesaur- arius, Electus Glasguensis,"" grants them some rents ' De ' certis terns suis in Edinburgh, pro sustentatione lampadis ' in choro, 1 dated 19th January 1473. All these foundar RELIGIOUS HOUSES. tions were confirmed by King James III. upon the 14th of May 1473. This convent was much renowned by Car- dinal Bagimont's calling before him, in the church hereof, all beneficed persons, to give up the value of their Ibenefices upon oath, of which he made a standing rental, called Ba- gimonfs-roll, which became the constant rule of taxing ecclesiastics at the court of Rome, when any person ap- plied for a benefice from the Pope : For Lesly informs us, Lib. 8. p. 341, that there was a provincial synod held at Edinburgh in the year 1512, * In coenobio Dominicano, ' praesente Pontificis nuncio Bajomano, in qua, communi * omnium voce, etsi repugnantibus multorum voluntatibus, ' fuerat fixum ut omnia sacerdotia, quorum redditus quadra- ' genas libras excederent, Papae pensionem, decimarum ac ' diplomatum nomine, numerarent. Hie census, in hunc us- 4 que diem, Bajomanus dicitur.' This convent was burnt down to the ground by a sudden fire, which happened 25th April 1528, and was scarce rebuilt at the time of the Refor- mation. The friars of this place are supposed to have written a chronicle of our nation, frequently cited ; but, by such as have perused the book, it is discovered to be nothing else but a copy of John Fordun, and the continuation by Walter Bowmaker. 2. BERWICK, situate at the mouth of the river Tweed. The convent at this place was founded in the year 1230, by King Alexander II. This monastery was famous for a parliament that was called there, in the year 1292, by Edward I. king of England, in order to determine the con- troversy that was submitted to him by Bruce and Baliol, concerning their right to the crown of Scotland. 3. AYR, the chief town in the shire of the same name. The monastery at this place was founded by William bishop of St Andrews, in the year 1230 ; or rather by King Alex- ander II. according to the author of the Extracta et varils Chronicis Scotiae. King Robert the Bruce grants them RELIGIOUS HOUSES. 443 L.20 Sterling, ' pro sustentatione Ecclesiae, et domorum * suarum, percipiend. de firmis dicti burgi.' King Robert II. confirms that gift made to Ayr, the 2d of October, in the sixth year of his reign. St Antonine says, that this was the first house that the Black Friars had in this country. 4. MOXTROSE, in the shire of Forfar. The convent at this place was founded in the year 1230, by Sir Alan Dur- ward. Patrick, abbot of this place, is a subscriber to Rag- mari's-roll in the year 1296. The friars hereof were transported to an hospital near to this city, founded by Mr Patrick Panter,* and thereafter brought back to their for- mer dwelling by an allowance of the Parliament, in the year 1524. 5. PERTH, the chief city of the shire of that name. They had a monastery here, founded near the walls of the city, in the year 1231, by King Alexander II. William bishop of St Andrew's confirms a grant of King Alexander II. in favour of the said friars, dated the twenty-seventh year of his reign. King Robert Bruce grants also to them ' quadraginta quatuor mercas Sterlingorum, percipiendas ' de firmis suis villae de Perth, et de nova custuma de Dun- ' dee et de Perth, 12mo die Aprilis, anno regni sui ll .' King James I. was murdered in this convent, and buried in the Carthusian monastery founded by himself near this city, according to Boethius. 6. ABERDEEN. They had also a considerable convent in this city, founded by King Alexander II. King David grants thereto, ' Pro anima Margaret de Logy, (his ' queen, therein designed Dilecta nostrae) fratribus prje- * dicatoribus de Aberdeen, centum solidos Sterlingorum, ' de baronia de Banrydeny, infra vicecomitatum de Aber- 4 deen. Dat. apud Aberdeen, 20 die Januarii, anno regni * The hospital was not founded, but only rebuilt by Mr Pantcr. See pitt. Reg. Scot. VoL II, p. 290. 444 RELIGIOUS HOUSES. * sui 33^. " Adam, filius Duncani dicti Glep, burgensis de Aberdeen,'" 1 gives also to this place ' quatuor perticatas ' terrae, quae terra nunc dicitur Madercroft, 1 as appears by the original charter, still extant in the Advocates Library, dated at Aberdeen, ' die Sabbati proxima ante festum ' Bead Thomae Apostoli, anno Domini 1271. 1 And by another original charter in the same place, " Annabella de Lydall, filia et heres quondam Petri Kynedy,^ gives several tenements in the city of Aberdeen, ' fratribus praedica- 4 toribus Ecclesiae Beati Johannis Baptistae de Aberdeen. 1 " This charter is dated the 10th August 1381. There is also in the said collection of original charters a precept to give sasine of a grant by " Elizabeth Gareauch, Domina de Tuligonis," which she had made to the foresaid monas- tery, ' cum consensu et assensu quondam Duncani Forbes, ' filii mei et heredis, viz. unum annuum redditum vigintiso- ' lidorum, usualis monetae Scotiae, annuatim levand. de 4 terris meis de Tuligonis, infra vicecomitatum de Aber- * deen,' dated the 1st May 1490. 7. ELGIN, in Moray. The convent at this place was founded by King Alexander II. in the year 1233 or 1234. Of these friars there is mention made in the chartulary of Aberbroth, p. 235. 8. STRIVELING. They had likewise a monastery found- ed near to the walls of this city by King Alexander II. in the year 1233. Boethius says, that Richard II. king of England, (whom nevertheless most people take to have been a counterfeit,) dying in the castle of Striveling, was buried in this church, " ad cornu summi altaris." 9- INVERNESS. This convent was founded in the year 1233, by King Alexander II. King David II. confirms to them ' Decem libras Sterlingorum, in dotationem Ecclesiae * suae annuatim percipiendas de firmis dicti burgi,' which were given them by his father, ' 21 m Octobris, anno regni ' sui 8.' His confirmation is dated at Edinburgh, * 20 mo * die Aprilis, anno regni sui 30 1110 . 1 RELIGIOUS HOUSES. 445 10. WIGTON, in the shire of the same name. The con- vent at this place was founded in the year 1267, by Der- vorgilla, daughter to Alan Lord of Galloway, and mother to John Baliol king of Scotland. 11. DUNDEE, in the shire of Angus. The convent at this place was founded by Andrew Abercromby, burgess of that city. John Grierson, provincial of this Order for thirty years, was here professed a Dominican, and much esteemed for his learning. He wrote two books, De casu ordinis, et paupertate ejusdcm, and died in the year 1564 12. Co u PAR, in the shire of Fife. The convent at this place was founded by the Macduffs, Earls of Fife, at the foot of the Castle-hill. Afterwards it was annexed to St Monans, and had a fine chapel of free-stone, which was much decayed before the annexation. It stood where Mr Melville of Balgarvy's house stands at present. 13. ST MONAXS, in the shire of Fife, situate upon a rock advancing into the sea, is also recorded to have been a priory of Black Friars. The chapel was founded by King David II. upon the 3d of April, the fortietli year of his reign, and was served by a hermit. By his charter, dated at Edinburgh, he grants thereto the lands of Easter-Birny in Fife, and some lands in the sheriffdom of Edinburgh. This chapel, which was a large and stately building of hewn stone, in form of a cross, with a steeple in the centre, was given to the Black Friars by King James III. at the soli- citation of Friar John Muir, vicar then of that Order amongst us, and afterwards first provincial of Scotland, not- withstanding the opposition he met with from the English, who until then were united into one province with us : but there being at that time fifteen convents of this order amongst us, it was thought a number sufficient to make Scotland a province by itself. The walls of the south and north branches of this monastery are still standing, but 446 RELIGIOUS HOUSES. want the roof; and the east end and steeple serve for a church to the people of the parish of Abercromby. 14. ST ANDREWS, founded by William Wishart, bishop of that city, in the year 1274, and placed at the west-port of the street called the Northgate. King James V. annex- ed to this house at St Andrews the above two convents of Coupar and St Monans, at the desire of Friar John Adam- son, professor of divinity, and provincial of the Order in Scotland. The charter is dated at Edinburgh, the 23d January, the eighth year of his reign. 15. GLASGOW. The convent at this place was founded by the bishop and chapter of this city, in the year 1270. King Robert I. grants to the monks of this place, ' viginti * mercas Sterlingorum, pro sustentatione luminarium, anno ' 1315.' Isabel, duchess of Albany and countess of Lenox, grants them likewise c terras suas de Ballilagan, infra pa- ' rochiam de Kylmaronock et vicecomitatum nostrum de c Levenox, pro salute Murdaci dudum Ducis Albaniae." The charter is dated ' apud manerium nostrum de Inch- * miryn, 18 VO die mensis Maii, anno Dom. 1451. 1 This Order is one of the most considerable of the church of Rome ; for there have been three or four Popes, several cardinals, and a great many bishops and learned men of this Institute. Their superiors are chosen by the plurality of votes, according to the statutes written by " Vincentius de Bandel de Chateau-neuf," an Italian, and general of the Order. The brethren ought to renounce all worldly possessions. They ought to fast (or rather abstain from eating of flesh) seven months together, viz. from September to Easter. They ought not to lie on feather-beds, nor in sheets, but on a mattress. They ought to say every Satur- day, in case there falls neither feast nor fast upon that day, the office of the Virgin Mary. Their patron, St Dominic, by Pope Honorius III. was made " Magister sacri palatii," which place to this day is possessed by a Dominican, to whom belongs the interpretation of the scripture, and the RELIGIOUS HOUSES. 447 censure of all books. They may preach every where, with- out the permission of the bishops ; and are allowed to con- fess all noblemen and their ladies, without the consent of their curates. They give the sacraments every where, and are exeemed from all ecclesiastical censures. The Emperor Henry VII. is thought to have been poisoned with a hostie given by a Dominican, since which time they were, as a pu- nishment, ordered to give the hostie with the left hand, which they observe to this day. Their habit is a white gown and scapular, which they pretend was prescribed to them by the Virgin Mary. The author of the Appendix to Archbishop Spotiswood^s History enumerates twenty-three housesbelonging to this Or- der without Berwick, upon the Borders ; whereas I reckon only fifteen, including also those two that were united to St Andrews, having found no more mentioned in our pub- lic records or private charters. And the manuscript, en- titled Extracta ex variis Chronicis Scotiae, after having enumerated their houses, together with their founders, as above, concludes, (as in fol. vers. 96,) ' Hoc ex relatione * fratris Andreae Leys asserentis se octogenarium, anno ' 1564. 1 And surely he could not have been ignorant of their number, since he had probably lived amongst them a considerable time, and perhaps in the highest stations that these friars can enjoy in their Order. CHAP. XVI. OF THE FRANCISCANS, OR GRAY FRIARS, AND THEIR MONASTERIES. SECT. I. Of the Conventuals. THE second order of the Mendicants are the Franciscans, so called from their patriarch St Francis, a merchant of 448 RELIGIOUS HOUSES. Assise in Italy. They were also called Minorites (Fratres ininores) or Gray Friars, from their habit, and were es- tablished by that saint in the year 1206, and confirmed by Pope Innocent III. in the 1209- Their superiors are cal- led wardens, (Custodes.) They follow a particular rule, prescribed to them by their founder, and are divided into Conventuals and Observantines. These last were reformed by Bernardine of Sienna, in the year 1419, and were called Observantines, because they pretend to observe the rule of St Francis more strictly, by going bare-footed, and wearing no shirts ; and the other were called Conventuals, since Pope Innocent IV/s time. They came into Scotland in the year 1219, and had eight convents amongst us, situated at the following places, viz. 1. BERWICK, upon the Borders, was of the custody of Newcastle, and had some small rents conferred upon them by the liberality of our kings. 2. ROXBURGH, in the shire of Teviotdale, situate upon the confluence of the rivers Tweed and Teviot. It was likewise subject to the custody of Newcastle. The friars hereof were allowed a church-yard, which was consecrated by William bishop of Glasgow in the year 1235. Adam Blunt was superior or w r arden of this convent in the year 1296. 3. DUMFRIES, in the shire of the same name, situated upon the river of Nith. Here these friars had a convent founded by Dervorgilla, daughter to Alan Lord of Gallo- way, and mother to John Baliol king of Scotland. In this monastery, or rather in the church of this place, Robert Bruce, Earl of Carrick, killed Red Robert Cuming, before the high altar, in the year 1305 ; and James Lindsay, with Roger Kilpatrick, killed Sir Robert Cuming in the the sacristy : Whereupon they were all cursed and excom- municated by Pope John XXII. at Avignon, the 28th June, the second year of his pontificate. John Duns Sco- tus, sirnamed the Subtile Doctor, was here clothed with the IIELIQIOUS HOUSES. 449 habit of St Francis. He died at Cologne the 8th Novem- ber 1308, in the thirty-fourth year of his age. 4. DUNDEE, in the shire of Forfar. There was also a convent of this Order in this city, founded by the said Der- vorgilla. It had no revenues, and was supported only by alms. Lady Beatrix Douglas, relict of William earl of Errol, gave to these friars L.100 Scots, for supporting them in their extremities, and for the reparations of the monas- tery : Upon which account the said friars and their succes- sors were obliged daily to say mass at the high altar, f sub- ' missa voce, vel cum nota,' which mass Avas called, 6 Missa ' Domini pro anima dictae Beatricis, ac pro animabus Wil- ' helmi olim sponsi sui, et Wilhelmi Comitis de Errol filii 1 ejus, 1 &c. And if the said countess should, as she de- signed, build within the church an altar in honour of the three kings, then the said mass should be said daily at the altar consecrated in honour of the aforementioned kings, as the indenture betwixt the above countess, James Lindsay vice-general of Scotland, and the warden of the convent, which consisted of fourteen brethren, who sign the Capitular Act at Dundee the 25th November 1482, bears. 5. HADDINGTOX. There was also a monastery of these friars in this place ; where William first Lord Seton was buried, who gave them six loads of coals, to be taken weekly out of his coal-pit of Tranent, and the value of three pounds annually out of the Barns. Edward I. defaced this place ; the quire of which was called Lucerna Laudoniae, because of its beautiful structure. It appears by our manuscript histories, that upon the festival day of St Ninian, in the year 1421, the waters, by constant rains, swelled to such a height that there were a great many houses entirely defaced in this place, and the people went into the church in a great boat ; so that the sacristy, with their fine library and ornaments for divine service, were spoiled. 6. LANEBK, in the shire of Clydesdale. There was a monastery of this Order founded here by Robert Bruce king Ff 450 RELIGIOUS HOUSES. of Scotland, in the year 1314. There was a general chapter held in this place upon the llth July 1490, where, all the wardens-capitulary being gathered, they confirmed and ap- proved the indenture above-mentioned betwixt Lady Bea- trix Douglas, countess of Errol, and the friars of Dundee, and ordered it to be put in execution. 7. KIRKCUDBRIGHT, the chief town of the shire of that name. Brother John Carpenter, who Avas an excellent en- gineer, and dextrous in contriving all instruments of war, was professed in this place. He fortified the castle of Dum- barton; for which he had L.20 Sterling of yearly allowance settled upon him by David II. 8. INNERKEITHING, in the shire of Fife. John Gray, a son of the Lord Gray, was here professed, and took the ha- bit of St Francis. He lived to a great age, and at the Re- formation retired to Brussels, where he was murdered in the church of the Franciscans, by the Prince of Orange's sol- diers, after that Don John of Austria had abandoned that city. [ SECT. II. OftJie Observantines* KING JAMES I. having wrote to the Franciscans of Co- logne, desiring them to send him some of their brethren of the Observantines to settle in his kingdom, the vicar-gene- ral accordingly sent him Brother Cornelius of Zirichzen, a Dutchman of great reputation, with several others of his brethren ; and after he had settled them in different places of the country, he returned back to Flanders, and died at Antwerp. These Observantines had nine convents in this kingdom, situated at the following places, viz. 1. EDINBURGH. The first convent that was bestowed upon them was in this city, founded by the citizens thereof; the buildings of which are said to have been so magnificent, that Brother Cornelius could not fora long time be induced to accept of them. At length, by the persuasion of the Bi- RELIGIOUS HOUSES. 451 shop of St Andrews, he settled there a Community in die years 1446 or 1447, where divinity and philosophy were constantly taught, until the demolishing of the convent in the year 1559. 2. ST ANDREWS. The Observantines had also a convent in this city, which was situate in the street called the Shoe- gate, where the high-school erected by Dr Young stands at present, and founded by James Kennedy bishop of that city, and afterwards finished by Patrick Graham his succes- sor, about the year 1478, and dedicated to St Francis. John Tullidaff, warden of this place, was one of those who condemned the thirteen articles of Patrick Hamilton abbot of Feme, as contrary to the faith of the catholic church, in the year 1527. John Wadlock, born at Dundee, and pro- vincial of this Order, was a famous mathematician in the reign of King James V., and for the most part resided at this place. This convent was likewise the novitiate of the Order. 3. GLASGOW. There was also a convent of those friars in this city, founded in the year 1476, by John bishop of Glasgow and Thomas Forsyth rector of Glasgow. Jeremy Russel; a friar of this place, and a man of great learning, was burnt as an heretic in the year 1559 ; and the year thereafter the convent was demolished by the Duke of Chastleherault and the Earl of Argyle. 4. ABERDEEN. In the midst of this city there was a fabric of a great length, which belonged to those friars, founded, about the year 1450, by the citizens of Aberdeen, and Mr Richard Vaus of Many, &c. It had a church, with a little steeple, which was constantly rung for convening the scholars to all public lessons in the college. We have in the Public Records, (Book 9- Chart. 2.) a charter of King James III. which gives an account of the foundations of the four forenamed monasteries, and runs thus : viz. ' Confirmare situationem loci, eisdem fratribus ' pertinen. infra burgum nostrum ac fundum et terras infra 452 RELIGIOUS HOUSES. < communitatem dicti burgi, Jacobum Douglas de Cassilis, ' et similiter situationem loci, eisdem fratribus pertinen. in- * fra civitatem Sancti Andreae, ac fundum et terras ibidem ( jacen. eis donat. per quondam Jacobum episcopum Sancti * Andreae, ac ejus successorem Patricium olim episcopum * Sti Andreae, ac etiam situationem loci, eisdem fratribus * pertinen. infra civitat. Glasguen. ex dono Johannis Epis- ' copi Glasgowensis moderni, et Magistri Tho. Forsithe, ' rectoris de Glasgow ; nee non situationem loci, eisdem ' fratribus pertinen. in burgo nostro de Aberdeen, ac fun- ' dum et terras infra diet, locum content, eis donat. et empt. 1 per communitatem dicti burgi de Aberdeen, et per quon- ' dam Richardum Vaus de Many, Jacobum Bisset,' &c. It is granted ' fratribus minoribus ordinis Obser\ T antiae apud * Edinburgh, 21 mo die Decembris anno 1479, et regni sui < gOmo. 1 5. AYR. The monastery at this place was founded, in the year 1472, by the inhabitants of this city. Vadingus speaks of a statue of the Virgin Mary, which is said to have wrought a great many miracles, in this place. 6. PERTH. The Observantines had likewise a house si- tuate near to the walls of this city, towards the south, found- ed by the Lord Oliphant, in the year 1460, which is now become a public burial-place. Buchanan, Lib. 16. acquaints us, that the house was destroyed llth May 1559/and adds, * Inventa cst apud Franciscanos supellex quidem non solum 4 copiosa, sed etiam admodum lauta, et quae decuplo tot * quot ipsi erant abunde satis fuisset. Dominicanis nequa- * quam eadem erat opulentia ; sed certe tanta, ut mendici- * tatis professionem facile falsam redargueret : adeo ut non 4 inscite quidam non fratres Mendicantes, sed Manducantes ' eos appellaret.' And that history said to be written by John Knox, Lib. 2. ad annum 1559, informs us, that the rascal multitude ran to the Gray and Black Friars, and that notwithstanding they had within them very strong guards kept for their defence, yet without opposition their gates BELIGIOUS HOUSES. 453 Avere broke up. The first invasion was upon idolatry : Thereafter the common people sought spoil. The Gray Friars was a place very well provided. Their sheets, blankets, beds, and coverings were such that no earl t of Scotland had better. Their napry was fine. There were but eight persons in the convent, yet they had eight pun- cheons of salt beef, wine, beer, and ale, besides store of other victuals. Within two days, so busy were they in abolishing idolatry, that the walls only did remain of this edifice. 7. STIRLING. The convent at this place was founded by King James IV. in the year 1494. Here he was accus- tomed to dine in the refectory, with the religious. He fre- quently assisted at mass in their quire ; and in Lent, retir- ing from all worldly affairs, he gave himself here entirely up to his devotions, and dined upon Good-Friday on bread and water, upon his bare knees, with the Community. 8. ELGIN, in Moray, situate upon the river Lossie. The convent at this place was founded by John Innes, in the year 1479, according to Dempster. 9- JEDBURGH, the chief town in Teviotdale, upon the west side of the Jed, which rises from divers burns that meet below the kirk Sudan, and falleth a little below Jed- burgh into the river Teviot. There the citizens founded a convent for those friars, in the year 1513. Adam Abel, a famous writer, lived and died in this monastery. He was first a canon-regular of Inchaffray, and afterwards became a Gray-Friar in this convent. He wrote a history of our nation in Latin, at the solicitation of George Lord Seton, intituled Rota temporum, which was afterwards printed at Rome by John Lesly bishop of Ross, with some small al- terations and additions. Thereafter he made an abridgment of it in English ; the original whereof was lost at Roslin, at the Revolution, when the mob spoiled the castle. He began at the creation of the world, and ended in the year 1535, in the octave of the nativity of the Virgin Mary. After- 454 RELIGIOUS HOUSES. wards he continued the work until the year 1536. On the first leaf he begins, ' In the name of the Blessed Trinity, 4 our Lady, St Francis, and St Augustine.' An imperfect copy of this book was in the library of Sir George Macken- zie of Rosehaugh. These friars possessed nothing, the places on which their houses stood only excepted. They were allowed to go con- stantly about with wallets or pocks on their shoulders, to beg their subsistence from well-disposed people; from whence they were called Mendicants ; and from their wear- ing-clothes, Gray Friars, their habit being a gray gown, with a coul, and a rope about their middle. They went bare-footed. At the Reformation, their possessions in the town of Edinburgh were given by Queen Mary to that city, with those of the Black Friars, the 12th March 16G. CHAP. XVII. OF THE CARMELITES, OE WHITE FRIARS, AND THEIR MONASTERIES. THE third Order of the Begging-friars was the Carme- lites, who had their beginning and name from Mount Car- mel in Syria. This mountain is situated in the tribe of Is- sachar, and is in circuit about thirteen leagues. It is cover- ed with several trees constantly green. There are a great many fountains, some villages, and several dens or caves to be seen there, wherein a great number of pilgrims of the west dwelt of old, exposed to the fury of the Turks. St Lewis king of France, returning from Asia, brought along with him some of this Order, and bestowed upon them a dwelling-place at the end of Paris, where the Celestines are now established. They were divided into thirty-two pro- vinces, of which Scotland was the thirteenth, where they were called White Friars, from their outward garment. RELIGIOUS HOUSES. 455 1 hey came into this kingdom the eleventh year of the reign of King Alexander III. and had nine convents, situated at the following places, viz. 1. TULLILUM, near Perth. Here Richard bishop of Dunkeld built for them a stately chapel and a large house in the year 1262. Bishop Thomas Lauder founded here a mass for the dead : " Missam quotidianam de requie can- tandam," say , Abbot Miln, " in Vitis Episcop. Dunkel- dens." who likewise informs us, that he transferred the sy- nods of his diocese, which were accustomed to be held here, to his cathedral of Dunkeld. Bishop Brown, one of his successors, finding the church much decayed, built the west part thereof from the ground, and the west side of the mo- nastery, to which he added two galleries of hewn stone. 2. DUXBAR, in the shire of East-Lothian. There was likewise a monastery of these friars founded at this place, in the year 1263, by Patrick earl of March. 3. LIXLITHGOW, the chief town of the shire of that name. At this place there was a monastery of this Order, founded in the year 1290, and consecrated to the. Virgin Mary, by the citizens of this town. 4. QUEENSFERRY, in the shire of West-Lothian or Lin- lithgow, where there was a monastery of this Order, found- ed by the laird of Dundas, in the year 1330, and consecrat- ed to the Virgin Mary. 8. ABERDEEN. There was also a monastery of these friars here, said to be founded by Philip deArbuthnot of that Ilk, ancestor to the present Viscount of that name, in honour of the Virgin Mary, in the year 1350. . There is a charter in the Public Records, Book I. No. 161. granting, ' fratri- ' bus de monte Carmeli burgi de Aberdeen, unum annuum ' redditum tredecim solidorum et quatuor denariorurn Ster- * lingorum annuatim percipiend. de terra Philippi de Ar- ' buthnot, ad emendationem fabricae Ecclesiae fratrum * praedicatorum. 1 This charter is given in the year 1355, and confirmed by King David II. the 17th August, the 456 RELIGIOUS HOUSES. thirty-seventh year of his reign. The same King David confirms, ' fratribus de monte Carmeli, donationem illam, ' quam Alexander dictus Constabulariusburgensis de Aber- ' deen fecit iisdem fratribus de Aberdeen, ad inveniend. ' ceram et vinum, ad Divinum officium complend. de qua- * tuor marcis Sterlingorum annui redditus de terra sua in * vico castri ejusdem villae. 1 King Robert II. confirms to the said friars, in the year 1382, a grant m?de to them by John Crab, burgess of Aberdeen, of ten merks Sterling, to be taken out of his lands lying in Aberdeen and thereabouts. Robert duke of Albany confirms likewise to the said friars * donationem et concessioner! quas fecit Wilhelmus Crab, ' fratribus de monte Carmeli Aberdon. de terris suis in ter- ' ritorio de Le Denburn, ex parte boreali viae regiae,' &c. The charter is dated ' apud Perth, 5 to Julii 1413, et gu- f bernationis suae anno 8.' 6. IE, WINE, situated upon the water of Irwine, which rises above Loudon-hill, and falleth into the frith of Clyde at the town of Irwine, and divideth Kyle from Cuningham. The convent at this place was consecrated to the Virgin Mary, and founded by the laird of Fullarton, as appears by a charter granted by Ranken of Fullarton to the pro- vincial and brethren of the convent near Irwine, in the year 1412. 7. BANFF, in the shire of the same name. Here there was a convent of this Order, dedicated to the Virgin Mary ; the rents, place, and lands whereof were annexed to the old college of Aberdeen, by King James VI. in the year 1617. 8. ST ANDREWS, Dempster, in his Apparatus, says, that the Carmelites had a settlement at this place, which does not appear probable ; for he has given us no particu- lars concerning it, either as to its founders or benefactors : And having met with no account of it in our printed au- thors or manuscripts, I dare not, upon his bare authority, positively assert that ever the Carmelites had a monastery in this city. RELIGIOUS HOUSES. 457 9. GREENSIDE, at the foot of the Calton craigs near Edinburgh, founded by the provost and council of that city, in the year 1526, the church whereof was dedicated to the Holy Cross. Some also assert, that they had a dwelling at Inverbervy in the shire of Kincardine, and another at Lufness in the shire of East-Lothian : But as I have seen no authentic vouchers for this, I cannot pretend to give any account of them. Their habit was white ; and upon their mantle, towards the end, were several rolls of stuff. But this habit being disagreeable to the people, Pope Honorius IV. ordered them to change their garb. And accordingly they took away their bands or rolls from their mantle, and wore after- wards a white cloak, above a gray or tawny gown. There was a fourth sect of these Mendicant friars, named Hermits of St Augustine, who pretend to derive their ori- gin from him, grounded upon some letters printed under the name of that doctor, and addressed, " Ad fratres in Eremo." But these letters are by the learned reckoned not to have been penned by St Augustine, and consequently the ground upon which they walk is imaginary : However, that Order had no houses in this kingdom. There is indeed one father William Paterson, author of a book intituled The Protestants Theology, printed in the year 1620, and dedicated to the Earl of Argyle, who calls himself, " Or- dinis Hermitarum Sancti Augustini Presbyter, Antwerpiae professus, et per Scotiam ejusdem ordinis Vicarius-genera- lis." But these titles have been only given to him in com- pliment, and long after the Reformation, when there were no religious houses extant in Scotland ; so that these titles which he assumed do not argue that there were houses of that Order amongst us. 458 RELIGIOUS HOUSES. CHAP. XVIII. SECT. 1. OF THE NUNS WHO FOLLOWED THE KILE OF ST. AUGUSTINE. THE nuns we had in Scotland, even as the men, follow- ed either the rule of St. Augustine, St. Bennet, or St. Fran- cis. They were bound never to go forth of their cloisters after they were professed and had made their vows, ac- cording to the constitution of Pope Boniface VIII. Those of St: Augustine's rule had only two monasteries in this country, the one of Chanonesses, the other of Dominican nuns. 1. ICOLMKILL, in the shire of Argyle. The Chanonesses of St. Augustine had a monastery in this island, consecrat- ed to St. Oranus, which probably was founded before the Benedictine monks had any settlement in that isle. They wore a white gown, and above it a rochet of fine linen, and lived in community together a long time after the Refor- mation. 2. The Dominican nuns, of a stricter life, refonned by St. Katharine de Sienna, an Italian, had their dwelling about a quarter of a mile from the city of Edinburgh, at a place called by corruption Sheens, because this monastery was consecrated to the forenamed Katharine de Sienna. This house was founded by the Lady Roslin, countess of Caithness. James Leirmonth, son and heir to 'Agnes Li- vingston, gives and dispones to the prioress and convent of the Senys, near Edinburgh, ' unum annum redditum de- ' cem mercarum usualis monetae regni Scotiae annuatim 4 levand. et percipiend. de tota et integra mea tertia parte * terrarum et baroniae de Livingston, cum pertinentiis ja- 1 cen. infra vicecomitatum de Linlithgow. Datum apud ' Edinburgh 15 10 Novembris 1533.' This charter is con- RELIGIOUS HOUSES. 459 firmed by King James V. the last day of December the same year. SECT. IT. OF THE NUNS WHO FOLLOWED THE EULE OF ST. BENNET, OR BLACK NUNS. The Black or Benedictine nuns followed the rule of St. Bennet, and were established by his sister St. Scholastics. They had the following five convents, situated as follows, viz. 1. NEWCASTLE, situate upon the river of Tyne, in the county of Northumberland, founded by King David I. 2. CARLYLE, in the county of Cumberland. Near to this city there was likewise a convent of these nuns, founded by the above King David, in honour of St. Bartholomew. 3. HALYSTON, near Berwick. Marjory, prioress of this place, swears fealty to Edward Langshanks in the year 1296, according to Prynne, p. 663. 4. DALMULIX, founded by Walter Lord High-steward of Scotland. The nuns of this place followed also the rule of St. Bennet, notwithstanding that the canons of Symp- ringham, who were their directors, lived according to the rule of St. Augustine. 5. LIXCLUDEX, in the shire of Dumfries, was founded in the reign of King Malcolm IV. by Uthred father to Hol- land lord of Galloway. " Alienore Priouresse de Lenclu- den del Conte de Dumfries 1 '' is mentioned by Prynne, " ad annum 1296."" This priory was afterwards changed by Archibald the Grim, earl of Douglas and lord of Gallo- way, into a college or provostry, because of the lewd and scandalous lives of the nuns. 460 BELIGIOUS HOUSES. SECT. III. OF THE BERNARDINE OB CISTERTIAN NUNS. THE BernardineS) or Cistertians^ lived likewise conform to the rule of St Bemiet, and followed some private consti- tutions, and had thirteen convents situated at the following places, viz. 1. BERWICK-UPON-TWEED, founded by King David I. who granted considerable revenues. Agnes, prioress of this place, swears fealty to King Edward I. in the year 1296. Afterwards King Robert III. by reason of their frequent adherence to the English, deprived them of then: possessions in Scotland, which he disposed of in favour of the Praemon- stratenses of Dryburgh, with consent of the bishop of St Andrews, in whose diocese they were. His charter is dated at Scone, the 9th of March, and first year of his reign. 2. ST BOTHANS, situated upon the water of Whittiter, in the shire of Berwick, amongst the hills of Lamermuir, which are a long chain of mountains that divide the Lothians from the shire of Berwick. Here there was a priory of nuns, said to be founded by one of the countesses of March, in the reign of King William the Lyon. Ada, prioress of St Boythan, (according to Prynne, Vol. III. p. 653,) is one of those that took an oath of fidelity to King Edward I. of England, in the year 1296. For which reason that prince, by a writ directed to the sheriff of Berwick, orders all the lands and tenements belonging to this convent to be restored to it, Ibid. p. 666. St Bothans is said to have been a cell depending upon South Berwick. 3. THREE-FOUNTAINS, or TREFONTANA, in Lamermuir, on the borders of Lothian, founded by King David I. was also a cell of South Berwick. 4. ELBOTTLE, on the Frith of Forth, in the shire of Haddington, was likewise a cell of South Berwick. Sir James Maxwell of Inverwick, knight, was created Earl of Dirleton and Lord Elbottle by King Charles I. in the year RELIGIOUS HOUSES. 461 1646; but dying without issue-male, his honours became extinct. 5. GULANE, situate on the Frith of Forth, near to Gu- lanness, in the shire of Haddington, founded by King David I., is said to have been also a cell of South Berwick. 6. COLDSTBEAM, situated upon the banks of the river Tweed, in the shire of Berwick, was founded by Cospatrick earl of March, (father to Earl Waldeve) and Derder his la- dy. It was dedicated in honour of the Virgin Mary. He died in the year 1166, having mortified to this place, by his charter of foundation, f unam carrucatam terrae, sciz. * dimidiam carrucatam de terra de Layval, et aliam dimi- ' diam de terra de Birgham, et etiam carrucatam terrae ' de Hirsel, quam Derder Comitissa sponsa mea dedit eis- * dem Monialibus.' The nuns of this place were brought from Withow in England. King James V. gives a charter to Isabel Hope Pringle, prioress of this place, of the lands of Hirsel and Greden, with the fishing belonging thereto upon the water of Tweed. The queen-dowager consents for her right of liferent the 6th September 1528. 7. ECCLES, in the shire of Berwick, founded, according to Hoveden, in the year 1154 ; but the Book of Coupar says, anno 1155, " conventus Monialium secundo venit ad Eccles." It was founded by the above earl, and conse- crated to the Virgin Mary. Ada de Frazer is prioress of Eccles in the 1296. There is in the Public Records, Lib. 21. Num. 537, a charter, whereby Mariota Hamilton, prio- ress of this place, dispones to Alexander Hamilton of In- nerwick the village lands of Eccles, in 1667, which was confirmed by Queen Mary at Edinburgh the llth May the same year. This place was erected into a temporal lord- ship in favours of George Home, afterwards earl of Dun- bar. 8. MAXTJEL, near Linlithgow, on the water of Avon, a little above the bridge, within the parish of Moranside, in the shire of Stirling, consecrated to the Virgin Mary, and 462 EELIGIOUS HOUSES. founded by Malcolm IV. in the year 1156. Christiana, prioress of this place, swore fealty to Edward I. of Eng- land, at Linlithgow, July 28. 1291 ; and Alice is prioress of tliis place in the year 1296. King William grants to these nuns ' totam decimam omnium reddituuni meorum ' de vicecomitatu de Lythgow, et de firma burgi de Lyth- ' gow, et de firmis extra burgum, et de molendinis, et in * denariis, et in frumento, et in farina, et in brassio, et in * praebenda." 1 King Alexander II. grants to them likewise ' molendina sua de Lythgow, cum tota secta eorund. mo- ( lendinorum, et cum omnibus justis pertinentiis suis. 1 And Roger of Avenel gives them ' unam celdram frumenti 4 singulis annis, de se et heredibus suis recipiend. de horreo 4 suo de Abercorn, ad Natale Domini, in perpetuam elee- 4 mosynam.' Part of the church and house, which was of hewn stone, is yet entire, and belongs to the earl of Lin- lithgow, to whose predecessor it was given sometime after the Reformation. 9. HADDIXGTON, in East-Lothian, founded by Ada coun- tess of Northumberland, and mother to King Malcolm IV. and King William, in the year. 11 78, and consecrated to the Virgin Mary. She gave the lands of Clerkington, near Haddington, to this convent. The lands commonly called the Nunlands, now called Huntington, belonged likewise to the nuns of this place, together with the churches of Athel- stoneford, and Crail in Fife, with their tithes. Eve, prio- ress of Haddington, is one of the subscribers to Ragman s- roll in the year 1296, Prynne, Vol. III. p. 656. There is a charter of Richard Maitland of Ledington, knight, de- signed " CEconomus monasterii Monialium de Haddington," who confirms, as superior, a grant made by James Cock- burn of Skirling, to William Maitland of Ledington, heir- apparent to the principal secretary of the queen, and to his heirs-male, -which failing, to John and Thomas Maitland, his brethren, of the lands of Bagbie, within the constabu- lary of Haddington, dated 15th December 1564. There is RELIGIOUS HOUSES. 463 likewise a precept of Dame Isabel Hepburn, prioress of this monastery, directed to Richard Cranstoun, her bailie, or- dering him to infeft William Maitland, the younger of Led- ington, in their lands of Haddington, which she names to be ' terras dominicales monasterii nostri de Hadington, terras de ' Mertoun, terras de West-Hopes, terras de East-Hopes, * terras de Wadende, terras de Newlands, terras de Windi- ' slaw, terras de Snowdoun, terras de Carfrae, terras de ' Littlenewtoun, cum decimis, 1 which she had granted him in feu, with the consent of her chapter, dated at their mo- nastery of Haddington the 20th day of October 1567. 10. NORTH-BERWICK, towards the mouth of the Frith of Forth, in the shire of Haddington, consecrated to the Vir- gin Mary, and founded by Malcolm son of Duncan earl of Fife, in the year 1216.* " Adam de Kilconcath, Comes de Carrick, 11 confirms to the nuns of this place the donation of the patronage -of the church of Kilconchar, (formerly gi- ven them by his predecessors,) by his original charter dated at Kilconchar in the year 1266. This is afterwards confirm- ed by Gamelinus bishop of St. Andrews, in the year 1271. Dame Isabel Home, daughter to Alexander Home of Pol- wart, prioress of this place, gives to her kinsman Alexan- der Home, in feu, the teind-sheaves of Largo church in Fife, in the year 1532 ; and Dame Margaret Home, like- wise prioress of this place, and daughter of the same family, gives a tack of the parsonage teinds of Logic, in the dio- cese of Dunblane, to Sir Patrick Home of Polwart and his heirs, the 24th March 1555. The lands of Methritch and Ivirkamaston, with the churches of Maybole and Kilbride, &c. belonged to this place. 9. ELCHOW, or ELQUHOW, in Strathern, upon the water of Tay, was founded upon a spot of ground which belong- ed to Dunfermline, by David Lindsay of Glenesk and his mother. Madoch earl of Strathern gave the lands of Kin- naird in Fife to this nunnery, which were afterwards feued * Vid. Sibbald's Hittoty of Fife, p. 96. 464 RELIGIOUS HOUSES. out to Alexander Lesly, by Magdalen prioress of this place. At present it gives the title of Lord to the eldest son of the Earl of Wemyss. 9. ST. LEONARD, near to Perth, was an ancient priory, founded before the year 1296 ; for Prynne, p. 65, in that year makes mention of " La Priouresse de Seint Leonard, juxta la ville de Seint Johan de Perth." The prioress here- of is mentioned ad annum 1373, in the chartulary of Aberbrothock, p. 225. It was afterwards suppressed by King James I. and annexed to the Charterhouse of Perth which he founded near that city, together with the Mag- dalene's lands. 11. In the chartulary of St Giles, the nuns of St.' Mary's Wynd in the city of Edinburgh are recorded. The chapel and convent stood near to the walls of the garden belonging at present to the Marquis of Tweeddale ; and from its be- ing consecrated to the Virgin Mary, the street took its name, which it still retains. SECT. IV. OF THE NUNS WHO FOLLOWED THE RULE OF ST. FRANCIS, OR CLARESSES. THE nuns who followed St Francis's rule were establish- ed by St Clare, from whom they were called Claresses. She was born of honourable parents, at Assise in Italy, and was admitted into the order by St Francis himself, the 19th March 1212, and afterwards soon followed by a great many other ladies, for whom St Francis wrote a particular rule, full of rigour and austerities. They had no revenues, and depended wholly upon the providence of God, and the charity of the people, for their subsistence. The nuns of this institute had only two houses in this country, viz. 1. ABERDOUR, in the shire of Fife, 2. DUNDEE, in the shire of Angus, Of whom there is little or no mention made by our wri- ters. RELIGIOUS HOUSES. 465 Besides the nunneries above-mentioned, there was one whose Order is not known, viz. COLDIXGHAM, situate two miles from Eymouth, in the shire of Berwick. This was certainly the oldest nunnery in Scotland ; for historians inform us, that Ebba, abbess of this place, together with her nuns, disfigured themselves, by cutting off their upper lips and noses, to avoid the lustful violence of the Danes, who there- upon burnt this monastery to ashes, together with the ab- bess and nuns, about the year of Christ 870. See Matih. of Westminster, p. 313, and Camerariiis, p. 122. It conti- nued in ruins until Edgar king of Scotland rebuilt it, in the year 1098, and bestowed it upon the Benedictine monks of Durham. CHAP. XIX. OF THE COLLEGIATE CHURCHES. BESIDES these regulars, we had several colleges erected for secular canons. They were called Prcepositurce, or Col- legiate Churches, and were governed by a dean or provost, who had all jurisdiction over them. They were institute for performing divine service, and singing of masses for the souls of the founders and patrons, or their friends. These churches consisted of pTebenda.r'ies,( Prccben darn,) or canons, (Canonicii,) where they had their several degrees or stalls, and sat for singing more orderly the canonical hours, and, with their dean or provost, made up the chap- ter. They were commonly erected out of several parish churches united for that effect, or out of the chaplainries that were founded under the roof of their churches. The list of which, (being thirty-three in number) accor- ding to the order of the alphabet, is as follows : 1. BIGGAR, in the shire of Lanerk. The college of this place was dedicated to the Virgin Mary, and founded by Malcolm lord Fleming, Lord High-chamberlain of Scotland, 466 RELIGIOUS HOUSES. in the reign of King James V. and ancestor to the Earl of Wigton, for a provost, eight prebendaries, four singing-boys, and six poor men, in the year 1545 ; which foundation was first confirmed by Cardinal Bethune, archbishop of St An- drews, and afterwards by the Pope's bulls. Robert Stuart, natural son to King James V. abbot of Holyroodhouse, and thereafter Earl of Orkney, gives to this college, ' cum con- 4 sensu capituli monasterii sui Sanctae Crucis de Edinburgh, 4 jus patronatus vicariae perpetuae ecclesiae parochialis de 1 Dunrod, Candidae Casae diocesis, ad requisitionem Jaco- * bi domini Fleming, filii praefati Malcolmi consanguine! * sui, die quinto mensis Mali anno 1555. 1 In his disposition, ' Magister Johannes Stevenson, protho-notarius Apostoli- * cus, ecclesiae metropolitanae Glasgowensis praecentor, * dictae parochialis ecclesiae de Dunrod vicarius, 1 is designed * Primus Praepositus Beatae Mariae de Biggar.' 2. BOTHAM, in the shire of East Lothian, was founded by Hugh Gifford, last Lord Yester of that surname, for a provost, seven prebendaries, and two singing-boys, about the year 1418. Alicia de Haya, relict of William de Haya Lord Yester, mortified several lands to this collegiate church, for the benefit of a chaplain, who was to perform divine service in that church. 3. BOTHWELL, in Clydesdale, founded by Archibald the Grim, earl of Douglas, for a provost and eight prebenda- ries, the 10th October 1398; to which he grants the lands of Osberingston, in his barony of Bothwell, and the lands of Nether Urd, and mill thereof, in the sheriffdom of Peebles, " in perpetuam eleemosynam." Mr William Foulis is designed " Gustos Privati Sigilli, et Praepositus de Bothwell, 11 by King James I. the twenty-third year of his reign. 4. CAHNWATH, in Clydesdale, was founded by Sir Tho- mas Somerville of Carnwath, ancestor to the Lord Somer- ville, with the consent of William Somerville his son and heir, for a provost and six prebendaries, in the year 1424. RELIGIOUS HOUSES. 467 5. CORSTORPHIX, in the shire of Mid-Lothian, was de- dicated to St John the Baptist, and founded near the pa- rish church of that place, by Sir John Forester of Corstor- phin, Lord High-chamberlain of Scotland, and ancestor^ to the present Lord Forester, in the year 1429, for a provost, five prebendaries, and two singing-boys. The churches which belonged to this college were those of Corstorphin, Dalmahoy, Halton, &c. The teinds of Ratho, the half of the teinds of Addiston, and the half of the teinds of Upper Gogar, belonged also to this place. The first provost there- of was Nicholaus Bannatyne, who died in the year 1470, and was buried in this church, where his epitaph is still extant. 6. CARAIL, in the shire of Fife, where, at the desire of the prioress of Haddington, there was erected a collegiate church, in the year 1517, for a provost, a sacrist or trea- surer, and ten prebendaries. The church, which is a large building, stands as yet, with the vestry and choir. 7. CRICHTOX, in Mid-Lothian, eight miles south from Edinburgh, was founded the 26th December 1449, by Sir William Crichton chancellor of Scotland, with the consent of James Crichton of Frendraught, knight, his son and heir, for a provost, nine prebendaries, and two singing boys, out of the rents of Crichton and Locherwart, a men- sal church belonging to the archbishop of St Andrews ; re- serving to the bishop the patronage of the prebends of Vo- grie, Arniston, Middleton, and Locherwart. 8. DALKEITH, in the shire of Mid-Lothian, four miles south from Edinburgh, was founded by James Douglas earl of Morton, in the reign of King James V. 9. DIRLETON, in East-Lothian, was founded by Sir Walter Haliburton of Dirleton, in the year 1444. 10. DCXBAR, in the shire of East-Lothian, was founded by George earl of March, in the year 1392, for a dean, an arch-priest, and eight prebendaries, who were named from their several prebends or benefices, viz. of Dunbar, Pin- 468 RELIGIOUS HOUSES. carton, Spot, Belton, Pitcox, Linton, Dunse, and Chirnsidc. The patronage of this church fell to the king, by the for- feiture of George earl of March, in the year 1434. 11. DUMBARTON, in the shire of the same name, was founded by Isabel countess of Lennox and duchess of Al- bany, about the year 1450, and dedicated to St Patrick, the apostle of Ireland, who was born in Lennox. The lands of Little Ballernick, Ferkin, and several other lands in the shire of Dumbarton, were mortified to this collegiate church. 12. DUXGLASS, in the shire of East-Lothian, was found- ed, for a provost and several prebendaries, by Sir Alexander Home of that Ilk, ancestor to the present Earl of Home, in the year 1450, to which he gave * quatuor terras husban- ' dias in villa de Chirnside, et terrain valoris unius mercae ' infra husbandriam, et octo mercas annul redditus, de qua- ' tuor terris dominicis, in villa de Chirnside, in comitatu * Marchiae, apud Dunglass, quinto die mensis Augusti, * A. D 1450 ;' which donations were confirmed by King James II. at Falkland the same year. 13. FOULIS, in the shire of Angus, was founded by Sir Andrew Gray of Foulis, ancestor to the Lord Gray, for a provost and several prebendaries, in the reign of King James II. 14. St GILES, in Edinburgh. It was formerly a parish church, of which the abbot of Scone was patron, and was erected into a collegiate church by King James III. in the year 1466, out of the united chaplainries founded formerly therein. The annexed parishes of Dumbarnie, Pottie, and Moncrief, in Perthshire, with their tithes, belonged to the dean of this place, who was at the king's nomination after the college was erected. Gavin Douglas, thereafter bishop of Dunkeld, was some time dean of this place. 15. GUTHRIE, in the shire of Angus or Forfar, was a collegiate church, founded by Sir David Guthrie of that Ilk, who was Lord High-treasurer in the reign of King RELIGIOUS HOUSES. 469 James III. for a provost and three prebendaries, the num- ber of which was afterwards increased by Sir Alexander Guthrie of that Ilk, his son and heir, who was slain at the battle of Flodden in the year 1513. 16. HAMILTON, in Clydesdale, was founded in the year 1451, for a provost and several prebendaries, by Sir James Hamilton of Cadzow, ancestor to the Duke of Hamilton. 17. KILMAURS, in the shire of Ayr, was founded the 13th of May 1403, for a provost and eight prebendaries, with two singing-boys, by Sir William Cuningham of Kil- maurs. 18. KILMUND, in Cowal, one of the sub-divisions of the shire of Argyle, was founded " in honorem Sancti Mundi abbatis," by Sir Duncan Campbell of Lochow, ancestor to the Duke of Argyle, for a provost and several preben- daries, the 4th of August 1442. He grants them ' tres ' mercatas terrae de Achinlochir in baronia de Kilmund, ' sex mercatas terrae de Blaremore et Garenlect ibidem, et ' duas carrucatas terrae de Craighawtis in baronia de Cow- * all, duas mercatas terrae de Cesflade et Cloyne in baronia ' de Kilmund, unam mercatam terrae de Kylanclew in * Lochow,' &c. This charter is confirmed by King James II. at Perth, the 12th of May 1450. 19. KIUKHEUGH, situate upon an eminence in St An- drews, near the harbour. It was first founded upon a rock near the shore, a little without the end of the pier, which was called the Lady^s Craig ; but the sea afterwards having spoiled it, it was built on dry ground in St Andrews, and was called " Praepositura Sanctae Mariae de rupe,"" or " Ca- pella Regia." Upon the seal of the chapter was engraven these words, " Capella Domini Regi Scotorum." It had a provost and ten prebendaries, and belonged formerly to the Culdees, until about the beginning of the fourteenth cen- tury. There was in this college a statue of King Constan- tine, who retired from the world, and became a Culdee in this place. The Kirk of Ceres in Fife belonged to this 470 IlELIGIOUS HOUSES. collegiate church, which was united to the bishopric of St Andrews, with some exceptions, by the Parliament, in the year 1621. 20. LINCLUDEN, in Galloway, situated upon the water of Cluden;, where it falls into the river Nith, some few miles above Dumfries, was formerly a cloister of black nuns, as is above related. But it was afterwards changed into a pro- vostry by Archibald the Grim, earl of Douglas, in the reign of King Robert III. " Magister Alexander de Gar- " nys, Praepositus de Lincludan," is designed by Archibald lord Galloway " Cancellarius noster," in a charter dated the 12th February 1413. 21. ST MARY in the FIELDS, (Sanctae Mariae in Campis.) This collegiate church stood exactly where now the college of Edinburgh is built. Richard Bothwell, provost of this place, is mentioned in a charter of Robert abbot of Holy- roodhouse, who presents George Ker to a prebend in this church, ' ad altare Beati Matthaei, infra dictam eccle- * siam Sanctae Mariae, secundum vim et formam fundationis, * quinto die Februarii anno 1546 ;' requiring him, as pa- tron, to grant to the said George, ' realem et corporalem ' possessionem hujusmodi canonicatus et prsebendae, cum * universis et singulis suis feodis, fructibus, annuis redditi- ' bus, proventibus, juribus, obventionibus et proficuis qui- ' buscunque ejusdem canonicatus.' There is a charter of King James V. in the Public Records, confirming a grant made by James Laing, ' uni Capellano Divina celebranti * ad altare majus infra ecclesiam collegiatam Beatae Ma- ' rise in Campis, &c. die 19 no Junii 1530.' 22. METHVEN, near the river of Almond, in the shire of Perth, about four miles from the city of that name, was founded in the year 1433, for a provost and several preben- daries, by Walter Stuart earl of Athol, one of the younger sons of King Robert II. 22. MINNIBOLE, in Carrick, a collegiate church, conse- crated in honour of the Virgin Mary, was founded by Sir KELIGIOUS HOUSES. 471 Gilbert Kennedy of Dunnure, ancestor to the earl of Cas- sili's, in the year 1441, for a provost and several prebenda- ries ; to which he grants ' omnes et singulas terras suas de * Largenlen et Broklach, infra comitatum de Carrick. * Apud Edinburgh, 18 TO die mensis Maii, et anno prae- ' dicto. 1 24. RESTALRIG, in the shire of Mid-Lothian, within a mile of the city of Edinburgh, was founded in honour of the Blessed Trinity and the Virgin Mary, by King James II. who gave thereunto ' rectoriam ecclesiae parochialis 4 de Leswade ;' but died before the foundation was settled. King James IV. founded there eight prebendaries, and gave * in Divini cultus augmentum, fructus rectoriae Sanctae * Mariae de Rothsay in Bute, Sodorens. dioces. capellan- * iam Sanctae Triduanag, et viginti libras annui redditus * novi operis sui regalis in Leith :' But dying before the foundation was fully brought to perfection, therefore King James V. by his charter, dated at Edinburgh the 10th October 1515, and confirmed by George and John abbots of Holyroodhouse and Newbottle, placed there a dean, nine prebendaries, and two singing-boys. 25. ROSLIX, in the shire of Mid-Lothian, about four miles from Edinburgh, was founded by William earl of Orkney and Caithness, in the year 1446, for a provost, six prebendaries, and two singing-boys. He gave thereto the church-lands of Pentland, four acres of meadow near to that town, with the kips, and eight sowms grass in the town of Pentland. There is above the door which enters from the church to a subterraneous chapel founded by Elisabeth countess of Buchan and Orkney, spouse to the above Earl William, an ancient inscription in Gothic letters, which, upon that account, not being legible to many, I shall here set down : " Forte est vinum, fortior est Rex, fortiores sunt mulieres, super omnia vincit veritas. 1 '' This is a beautiful structure, famous for its curious workmanship, and is not much defaced. 472 KELIGIOUS HOUSES. 26. ROYAL CHAPEL of STIRLING, erected by Pope Alexander VI. at the desire of King James IV. and was founded for a dean, sub-dean, sacristan, chanter or singer, treasurer, chancellor, arch-dean, sixteen chaplains at the king's collation, and six singing-boys at bis nomination, who had, by his majesty, a master of music appointed them. The dean of this place was appointed to be the queen's confessor, with Episcopal jurisdiction. That dignity was first annexed to the provostry of Kirkheugh, afterwards to the bishopric of Galloway, and, upon the demission of the Bishop of Galloway, it was by King James VI. annex- ed to the bishopric of Dumblane. It was endowed with the abbeys of Dundrennan and Inchmahome, the lands of Cessnock, the priory of Rosneth, the parsonage of Dunbar, with the arch-presbytery and prebendary of Spot, Wai- tame, Dunse, Pincarton, the churches of Damellington, Alloa, the two Cultons, Dairy mple, Kelly, Kirkmore, and other churches, chapels, and lands, valued in King James VI.'s time to a very high rental. 27. ST SALVATOR'S COLLEGE, in the city of St Andrews and shire of Fife, was founded in the year 1458, for a pro- vost and several prebendaries, by James Kennedy bishop of St Andrews, second son to Sir James Kennedy of Dun- nure, by Lady Mary his wife, daughter to King Robert III. He annexed to this place the churches of Cults, Kemback, Dininno, and Kilmany ; and dying 10th May 1466, was here interred under a magnificent tomb, with a plain coat of arms, without any inscription. Lindsay of Pitscottie, in his History, p. 68, says, that the bishop spent L. 10,000 Sterling on this tomb, and as much upon the col- legiate church, which was a vast sum in those days. 28. SETON, in the shire of East-Lothian, was founded for a provost, six prebendaries, two singing-boys, and a clerk, out of several chaplainries, united for that effect, by George second Lord Seton, the 20th of June 1493. The charter of foundation is afterwards confirmed by Andrew RELIGIOUS HOUSES. 473 abbot of Newbottle, therein designed " Apostolicae sedis delegatus." He built likewise the revestry or sacrist of Seton, and covered it over with stone, in the reign of King James IV. and, dying a little after, was buried near the high altar of this collegiate church. 29. SEMPLE, in the shire of Renfrew, was founded for a provost and three prebendaries, by John lord Semple, in the year 1505, near his own house of Castle-Semple. This foundation was confirmed by King James IV. at Edinburgh the 5th of June 1506. 30. TAIN, in the shire of Ross, was founded by Tho- mas, Bishop of Ross, ' cum consensu capituli sui, ad in- ' stantiam Jacobi III. Regis, in honorem Sancti Duthaci * Pontificis, 1 for a provost, eleven prebendaries, and three singing-boys, the 12th September 1481, " ad instar funda- * tionis ecclesiae collegiatse Bead Johannis Baptistae de 4 Corstorphin, Sancti Andrese diocesis.' 31. The TRINITY-COLLEGE of EDINBURGH was founded by Queen Mary of Geldres, mother to King James III. who died at Edinburgh in the year 1463, and was here buried. The parish-churches of Soultray, Fala, Lampeth-law, Easter Wemyss, Kirkurd, Ormiston, and Gogar were an- nexed to this collegiate church, together with the lands of Blance, which were mortified to the provost hereof in the year 1529. It was commonly called the Queen's college, and now goes by the name of the College kirk. 32. TULLIBARDINE, in Strathern, a part of the shire of Perth, was founded in honour of our blessed Saviour, for a provost and several prebendaries, by Sir David Murray of Tullibardine, ancestor to the Duke of Athol, in the year 1446. 33. YESTER, or ZESTER, in the shire of East-Lothian, was dedicated to St. Cuthbert, and founded for a provost, six prebendaries, and two singing-boys, by Sir William dc Haya of Locherward and Yester, ancestor to the Marquis of Tweeddale, in the year 1420. Dame Alicia de Haya, his 474 RELIGIOUS HOUSES. relict, did considerably augment the revenues of this col- legiate church in the year 1444. Of all these collegiate churches there were eleven, the patronage of which belonged to the king, viz. Restalrig, Kirkheugh, St. Giles, the Chapel-royal of Stirling, the Trinity College, St. Mary in the Fields, Dunbar, Dum- barton, Bothwell, Lincluden, and Tain. CHAP. XX. OF THE HOSPITALS. AFTER the Collegiate Churches, I shall give an account of the Hospitals that we had amongst us. They were erected either for receiving of strangers, or for maintaining poor and infirm people. And though I' cannot pretend to give an exact list of all the hospitals we had amongst us, yet, for the satisfaction of the reader, I have here subjoined an alphabetical catalogue of such hospitals as occurred to me in the perusal of old writs, which I am convinced may be vastly augmented by others who have more leisure for this study. 1. ABERDEEN, the chief city of the shire of the same name. There was an hospital in this city, founded by Ga- vin Dunbar bishop of Aberdeen, for the maintenance of twelve poor men ; to which, besides other donations, he mor- tified the yearly sum of L.100 to be divided amongst them, as appears by the charter of foundation, dated 23d Febru- ary 1531, which is still extant in the chartulary of Aber- deen, in the Advocates Library, fol. v. 173. 2. BALLIXCRIEF, or BANCRIEF, in the county of Edin- burgh, dedicated to St. Cuthbert. Prynne makes mention of " Walterus Magister donlus de Balnecrif " in the year 1292, and afterwards in the year 1296. " William Fornall, RELIGIOUS HOUSES. 475 Gardein del hospital de Seint Cuthbert de Balnecryf, del Counte de Edneburk, 1 " swears fealty to Edward I. king of England, according to the same author. 3. BRECHIN, in the shire of Forfar. " William de Bre- chin, films Henrici de Brechin, filii Comitis David," so designed in his foundation of the hospital of Brechin, or ' Maison Dieu, pro salute animarum Wilhelmi et Alexan- * dri regum Scotiae, Johannis comitis Cestriae et Hun- * tingtoniae fratris sui, Henrici patris sui, et Julianae ma- ' tris suae,' founds here an hospital. Albinus bishop of Brechin, and " Robertus de Monte alto,"" are witnesses to the charter. The original is transumed in a confirmation by King James III. in the year 1477. 4. EDINBURGH. There was an hospital likewise at Edin- burgh, founded in Bell's Wynd. It was called, " The Maison Dieu." 5. EDNAM, in the shire of Roxburgh, near Kelso. The hospital at this place was dedicated to St Laurence, and seems to have been founded by the Edmonstons of Ednam, who were patrons of this place. " Johannes de Edmonston, tutor dativus Jacobi de Edmonston, filiiet heredis quondam David de Edmonston de Ednem," presents Mr Robert He- riot to the chaplainry of this place, which was vacant by the death of Mr Alexander Crichton. This is confirmed by King James I. at Edinburgh, 27th September 1426. 6. Sx GERMANS, in the shire of Haddington or East-Lo- thian. We are uncertain by whom it was founded ; but in Ragmari's-roll we find mention made of " Barthelmeu Mestre de la meson de Seint German,"" anno 1296. 7. GLASGOW. There was an hospital in this city, where- in there were some waiting maids to attend the sick. It is made mention of in the chartulary of Paisley, p. 297, where it is said, ' Unus lectus fundatus in hospitali Sancti Nicho- ' lai in Glasgow, per venerabilem virum Magistrum Michae- ' lem Fleming.' RELIGIOUS HOUSES. 8. HOUSTON. Prynne, in his Collections, Vol. III. p. 656, mentions Friar John as master of the hospital of the Holy Trinity at Houston. 9. HOLYWOOD, in Galloway. Robert II. confirms a foun- dation of an hospital made within the monastery of Holy- wood, by Archibald the Grim, earl of Douglas. 10. ST JAMES, at the end of Stirling bridge. There was an hospital dedicated to St James, which belonged to, and is mentioned in the chartulary of Cambuskenneth, fol. rect. 71. 11. KINCARDINE-O'NEIL, in the shire of Aberdeen, was an hospital, founded before the year 1296; for at that time Prynne makes mention of " Wautier Mester del hospital de Kincardyn sur Neel." 12. KINGCASE, situated about half a mile from the town of Ayr, in the shire of Ayr : The traditional account of which is, that it was founded by King Robert Bruce, for eight leprous persons, who are each to have eight bolls of meal, and eight merks Scots yearly ; and if there is but one, he has the whole. Sir Thomas Wallace of Craigie, and his ancestors, have been always in use to present these persons, and causing inquiry to be made into the case of the person or persons before they are received. This hos- pital still subsists, 13. LA^ERK. Sir John Dalziel obtained of King Robert III. in the year 1393, to himself, and to Walter Dalziel his son, predecessor to the Earl of Carnwath, in feu, a gift of the whole revenue belonging to St Leonards hospital within the town of Lanerk, upon the condition that he and his heirs should cause say three masses every week, " pro salute Domini Regis et Anabellae Reginae, proliumque eorum. r> 14. LAUDER, a burgh-royal in the shire of Berwick, si- tuated near the river Leader. Ralph, master of the hospi- tal of Lauder, is mentioned in the year 1296 by Prynne ', Vol. III. p. 662. RELIGIOUS HOUSES. 477 15. ST LEONARDS, in the shire of Tweeddale. King James I. grants, " Davidi Rat, Vicario ordinis Praedicato- rum infra regnum Scotiae, confessori suo," the hospital of St Leonards near the town of Peebles. The charter is dated at Edinburgh the 25th July 1427. 16. ST LEONARDS, situated on the road betwixt Dal- keith and Edinburgh, where there was an hospital founded by Robert Ballantine, abbot of Holyroodhouse, for seven poor distressed people. 17. LIGERSWOOD, or LIGERTWOOD, in the shire of Ber- wick, was an hospital of long standing ; for, in the year 1296, " Nicol de Lychardeswode," guardian of the hospital here, swears fealty to Edward I. of England, Prynne, Vol. III. p. 661. 18. ST MARY MAGDALENE, in the shire of West-Lo- thian. King James I. in the year 1426, dispones to Robert de Lynton the hospital of St Mary Magdalene near Lin- lithgow, who had been nominated to that benefice by Queen Jean his spouse. This place was formerly governed by the Lazarites, a sect of religious who took their name from St Lazar, and were afterwards either extinguished or secular- ized. Lanerk belonged likewise to this sect 19- NEWBURGH, in Buchan, was an hospital, founded in the reign of King Alexander III. by Alexander earl of Buchan, Justice-general of Scotland. 20. ST NICOLAS. This hospital, of which the bishops of Moray were patrons, was founded near the bridge upon the water of Spey, by one of the bishops of Moray. " Wal- terus de Moravia, filius quondam Wilhelmi de Moravia,"" is a donator to this hospital, by his gift of the lands of .Agynway, " ad sustentationem pauperum ibidem recipien- dorum," Chart. Moray, fol. 56. Muriel de Pollock, daughter of umquhile Petrus de Pollock, gives a liberty to the hospital of St Nicolas, anent the village of Spey, to build a mill in the lands of Inverorkel, with some land ad- jacent. This Muriel had a daughter called Eva Mortach, 478 RELIGIOUS HOUSES. Lady Rothes. Vid. Chart. Morav. fol. 240. ad annum 1238. 21. ROTHFAX. John Bisset gives to God and the church of St Peter of Rothfan, for sustaining of seven leprous per- sons, the patronage of the kirk of Kyltalargy, to pray for the souls of William and Alexander kings of Scotland, and the souls of his ancestors and successors, about the year 1226, Chart. Morav. fol. v. 27. He grants another donation to the same purpose in the said year, f. 126. 22. ROXBURGH, in the shire of Teviotdale. There was at this place an hospital called " The Maison Dieu of Rox- burgh," the guardian of which place, called Nicol de Cha- pelyn, is mentioned by Prynne as one of those who did ho- mage to Edward I. of England in the year 1296. King Robert III. gives this hospital to Robert Archibald, the 23d March, and of his reign the first year, i. e. in the year 1391. 23. RUTHERFORD, situated upon the river Tweed, in the shire of Roxburgh or Teviotdale. The hospital here, which was dedicated to St Mary Magdalene, was given by King Robert III. to the abbacy of Jedburgh, upon condi- tion that they were to maintain a chaplain there, to pray for his soul and the souls of his ancestors kings of Scotland. * Et si forte (says the charter) ex incursu Anglorum, seu 6 alias ex eventu guerrae, dictus locus de Rutherfurde for- ' sitan sit destructus, quominus idem Capellanus ibidem se- ' cure poterit residere, dicti religiosi, per unum idoneum ' Capellanum, facient infra suum monasterium illud fieri, ' quosque idem locus de Rutherfurde in suis aedificiis fue- * rit, reformatis,' &c. This charter is dated at Glasgow the 2d May 1396. 24. SEXEWAR. Bartholomew de Egglesham is designed warden of the New Place of Senewar in the year 1296, by Prynne, Vol. III. p. 659. We are uncertain where this hospital stood ; but, by the resemblance of names, and some other circumstances, it seems probable that it was the town RELIGIOUS HOUSES. 479 of Sanquhar, a royal burgh situated on the river Nith in the shire of Dumfries. 25. SOLTRA, or SouxttA, in Mid-Lothian, ten miles south- east of Edinburgh, on the road that leads to Kelso. This hospital was founded on the top of the hill called Soutrahill, in the year 1164, by Malcolm IV. king of Scotland, for the relief of pilgrims and poor and sickly people. There were some lands belonging to this hospital, near to St Leonards, near Edinburgh. Alexander of Soutra is recorded at the year 1204 ; and " Badulphus, magister hospitalis de Soltre," is mentioned by Prynne in the yar 1292. John Heriot vicar of Soutra is witness to several charters in the year 1467- The ruins of this place are to be seen on the east side of the high-way as you go from Edinburgh to Kelso ; and after you pass the burn called the Backburn of Soutra, a little before you at Dundee, the twentieth and first day of APPENDIX. 545 October 1712 years. (Signed) Robert Norie, Preses, James Goldman, Clerk." The venerable bishop died in the year 1777. 3. Mr GEORGE IUNES, 1778. This Bishop was minis- ter of a chapel in Aberdeen, and was consecrated at AUoa, on the 13th of August 1778, by iBishop Falconar, Bishop Rose, and Bishop Petrie. He was collated at the same time to the superintendence of the district of Brechin, but did not live long to discharge the duties of it. He died on the 18th of May 1781 ; after which date the diocese remained some years vacant. 4. Dr ABERKETHY DRUMMOND, 1787. It has been already mentioned that this distinguished man was elevated to the episcopate on the 26th of September 1787 ; that he was consecrated as bishop of Brechin, but that almost im- mediately afterwards he was elected to the see of Edin- burgh, where he had his pastoral charge ; and that he con- tinued to preside over the clergy of that district till the year 1805. He was descended from the family of Abernethy of Sal- toun, in the shire of Banff ; and it was only upon his mar- riage with the heiress of Hawthornden, in the county of Mid-Lothian, that he assumed the name of Drummond. He wrote many small tracts, and was a good deal engaged in theological controversy both with Protestants and Roman Catholics ; but his intemperate manner defeated in most cases the benevolence of his intentions, and only irritated those whom he had wished to convince. He died on the 27th of August 1809. 5. Mr JOHN STRACHAN, 1788. This most respectable clergyman was sprung from the family of Strachan of Thornton in the county of Kincardine, now represented by M in 546 APPEN DIX. his kinsman, the gallant admiral, Sir Richard Strachan. He was consecrated at Peterhead on the same day with Dr A. Drummond, to whom, indeed, he was at that period appointed coadjutor ; but the latter being within a few months afterwards elected by the clergy of Edinburgh, Bishop Strachan was preferred to the undivided charge of the diocese of Brechin. ' He lived to a very advanced age, having, however, survived for some time the powers of his mind as well as of his body, and died on the 28th of Ja- nuary 1810, universally beloved and regretted. 6. DR GEORGE GLEIG, 1810. Seldom can it fall to the lot of a communion so small and so poor as the Episcopal Church in Scotland to enjoy the credit attached to so great a name as that of Bishop Gleig. His reputation as a scho- lar and a philosopher are so well established by his nume- rous works, that it is as unnecessary as it would be imper- tinent in me to attempt an eulogium, of which he would he the first to cah 1 in question the propriety. Having long discharged with much ability the various duties of a pres- byter, he was, in the autumn of 1808, elected by the clergy of Brechin, as coadjutor to their aged bishop ; and conse- crated at Aberdeen on the 30th of October the same year, by Bishop Skinner, Bishop Jolly, and Bishop Torry. On the death of Bishop Strachan in 1810, he was preferred to the sole charge of the diocese ; and, in 1816, upon the de- mise of Bishop Skinner, he was chosen by his brethren to fill the office of Primus, in virtue of which he presides in all the meetings of the Episcopal College. DUNBLANE. 1. Mr JOHN GILLAN, 1731. This able writer was a presbyter in Edinburgh, and entirely devoted to what was called the College party, or to those who opposed, in the ac- APPENDIX. 547 tual circumstances of those times, the distribution of the church into districts, and the appointment of diocesans. He was consecrated at Edinburgh on the llth of June 1727, by the Bishops Freebairn, Duncan, Ross, and Ouch- terlonie ; more, it has been thought, with the view of ad- ding to the strength of that particular interest, than of creating facilities for the performance of Episcopal offices. It appears, however, that he assumed the charge of Dun- blane the very year he was consecrated ; but the clergy of that district did not generally recognize his authority till after the agreement which was entered into by the two parties in 1731. From that period till he died in January 1735, Mr Gillan acted as bishop of Dunblane, with the approbation both of presbyters and prelates. His writings prove him to have been a man of talent as well as of respectable learning. His Life of Sage, including his Remarks on Sir James Dalrymple's Historical Collec- tions, displays considerable acuteness ; and his Vindication of the Fundamental Charter of Presbytery, is regarded as an excellent specimen of polemical composition, as well of a logical and well sustained argument. 2. Mr ROBERT WHITE, 1735. Mr White had the charge of a congregation at Cupar in Fife, when the clergy of Dunblane addressed the College of Bishops requesting to have him consecrated as their Ordinary. Mr Freebairn was, at the period in question, invested with the office of Primus ; and being suspected of indifference towards the cause of diocesan superintendence, his colleagues did not obey his summons to consecrate the bishop-elect at Edinburgh, but proceeded to Carsebank near Forfar, where, on the 24th of June, they elevated Mr White to the episcopate. The officiating bishops were Rattray, Keith, and Dunbar. Bishop White was, immediately upon his consecration, col- lated to the charge of Dunblane, and was afterwards, in the year 1743, elected by the clergy of Fife. He accepted M m2 548 APPENDIX. the latter district, in which he appears to have continued till the end of his life. He was chosen Primus in 1757, on the death of Bishop Keith, and presided over the church till the year 1761, when he also was removed to a happier state. After the resignation of Bishop White, the presbyters of Dundee proceeded to elect for their bishop Mr Thomas Ogilvie, minister of a chapel at Kinalie. The election bears date 17th July 1744 ; but it appears not that Mr Ogilvie was ever consecrated. The district remained some years vacant. 3. ME CHARLES ROSE, 1774. This bishop of Dunblane had formerly served the church as a presbyter at Down. He was consecrated at Forfar on the 24th of August 1774, by Bishops Falconar, Rait, and Forbes. How long he con- tinued to exercise the Episcopal jurisdiction over the clergy of Dunblane, I have no means of determining ; but it is ma- nifest that he succeeded Bishop Alexander in the see of Dunkeld some time after the year 1776. He died in the month of April 1791. FIFE. 1. ME ROBEET KEITH, 1733. As far as the records in my possession will allow me to determine, Bishop Keith was the first who exercised a diocesan superintendence over the clergy of Fife. Bishop Falconar, it has been already mentioned, kept up, during his life, some sort of Episcopal relation to the districts of Fife, Angus, and Mearns ; and from his death, which took place in 1723, till the period of Bishop Keith's election, the duties appropriated to the highest order of clergymen seem to have been performed in Fife either by the Primus, who at that time usually resided in Edinburgh, or by the ProoAmus, who had commonly the APPENDIX. 549 charge of a congregation in Dundee. In 1733, the Epis- copal ministers between the firths of Forth and Tay elected Mr Keith for their spiritual superior ; in which capacity he laboured among them for the space of ten years. In 1743 he resigned the district of Fife, having about the same time succeeded Bishop Rattray as Primus. The reader is al- ready aware that he died in January 1757, and not in 1756, as is elsewhere stated. 2. Mr ROBERT WHITE, 1743. Bishop White, who had been consecrated at Carsebank in 1735, and appointed bishop of Dunblane, was, in the year 1743, elected by the clergy of Fife, and translated to the charge of their dis- trict. He succeeded Bishop Keith as Primus, and died in August 1761. 3. Mr HENRY EDGAR, 1761. This clergyman, whose name is omitted in all the catalogues annexed to our church histories, was consecrated at Cupar in Fife, on the 1st of November 1659, by the Bishops White, Falconar, Rait, and Alexander. He was pastor of a congregation at Ar- broath. The reason of the omission now mentioned is perhaps fur- nished by the circumstance, that Mr Edgar was at first ap- pointed coadjutor to Bishop White. It is, however, perfectly certain that he succeeded his principal in the superintendence of the district, and continued to perform the duties of it as long as he lived. The period of his death is no where re- corded ; but it admits not of doubt that he survived his predecessor at least several years. Since his demise there has been no bishop of Fife, the duties of that district being performed at present, as they were before the election of Bishop Keith, either by the bishop of Edinburgh, or by one acting as his substitute. 550 APPENDIX. CAITHNESS AND ORKNEY. 1. MR ROBERT KEITH, 1727. It was to these remote and extensive districts that Bishop Keith was first appoint- ed to act as ordinary. He resigned them, however, in 1733, upon his election to Fife, as has just been mentioned at greater length in the foregoing section. 2. Mr WILLIAM FALCONAR, 1741. On a regular ap- plication from the clergy of Orkney and Caithness, Mr Falconar, presbyter at Forres, was consecrated as their bi- shop on the 10th September 1741. The officiating prelates on this occasion were Rattray, Keith, and White. In the following year, Bishop Falconar was chosen for the district of Moray. 3. MR ROBERT FORBES, 1762. This district having been long vacant, the presbyters of the two northern dio- ceses at length made choice of Mr Forbes, minister in Leith, as a fit person to be their bishop. He was accor- dingly consecrated, at Cupar in Fife, on the 24th of June 1762, by Bishop Falconar, Bishop Alexander, and Bishop Gerard. The distance of his charge seems not to have prevented him from fulfilling the duties wnich attached to it ; for, upon consulting his register, which is now in my hands, I find long lists of the young people, whom he had from time to time confirmed, in different parts of his diocese. Under the year 1746, there is the following memorandum, which will throw some light on the character of the man, as well as of the evil times in which he lived : " Here a great in- terruption has happened by my misfortune of being taken a prisoner at St Ninians, (in company with the Reverend Messrs Thomas Drummond and John Willox, Mr Stewart Carmichael, and Mr Robert Clerk; and James Mackay APPENDIX. 551 and James Carmichael, servants,) upon Saturday, the 7th of September 1745, and confined in Stirling Castle till Fe- bruary 4. 1746, and in Edinburgh Castle till May 29. of said year." Bishop Forbes died in 1776 ; since which time there has not been any bishop whose charge has been restricted to Orkney and Caithness. ROSS AND ARGYLE. 1. MR ANDREW MACFARLANE, 1796. It is not very clear in what manner, or by whom, the Episcopal duty of some of the remotest districts of Scotland was performed about the middle of last century. Ross appears to have been usually united with Moray, and the Isles with Ork- ney and Caithness, until Bishop Macfarlane, in 1796, re- signed the district of Moray to Bishop Jolly, and retained, together with Ross, the superintendence of Argyle. 2. Dr DAVID Low, 1819. On the death of Bishop Macfarlane, Dr Low, presbyter at Pittenweem, was unani- mously elected by the clergy of Ross and Argyle, and con- secrated at Stirling on the 14th of November 1819, by Bi- shop Gleig, Bishop Jolly, and Bishop Torry. It becomes me not to speak of those who are still at their post, and who, of consequence,are not yet proper subjects of history ; but I may be allowed to observe that the zeal and intelligence with which Bishop Low has entered upon his Episcopal duties, as they have already been of no small service to his extensive district, will, no doubt, secure for him, in the end, a lasting memorial of gratitude and esteem among both clergy and people. 552 APPENDIX. GLASGOW. . 1. MR ALEXANDER DUNCAN, 1731. The only record which presents itself to the reader of our histories, whereby he can discover any relation between a post-revolution bi- shop and the see of Glasgow, is the concordate already so often mentioned, which was ratified in 1731. " We have agreed," say the contracting parties, " that the diocese of Glasgow shall be under the inspection of Bishop Duncan, excepting only Annandale, Nithsdale, and Tweeddale, which shall be under the inspection of Bishop Freebairn." Mr Duncan had been minister of Kilpatrick-Easter ; was ejected at the Revolution; and was consecrated at Edinburgh in the year 1724, by Bishops Fullarton, Irvine, and Millar. He died in 1733, since which date there has not been any bishop collated to the district over which he presided. I find there are several other persons who were raised to the episcopate between the years 1722 and 1727, who yet were not appointed to the charge of any particular district. Their names and the dates of their consecration are as fol- lows: 2. Mr ROBERT NORRIE, deprived minister of Dundee, was consecrated at Edinburgh, in the year 1724, by the Bishops Fullarton, Irvine, and Millar. He died in the month of March 1727. 3. Mr JAMES ROSE, formerly established minister of Monimail, and afterwards minister of a chapel in Cupar of Fife, was consecrated at Edinburgh on the 29th of Novem- ber 1726, by the Bishops Freebairn, Duncan, and Cant. This Bishop Rose was, I believe, brother to the deprived prelate of the same name, who presided so long over the see of Edinburgh, as well as over the whole Episcopal church in Scotland after the Revolution. The death of the former- took place in March 1733. APPENDIX. 553 4. Mr DAVID RANKEN had been minister of Bennathie under the old establishment, and was consecrated at Edin- burgh on the llth of June 1727, by the Bishops Freebairn, Duncan, Rose, and Ouchterlonie. The period of his death has not been recorded. 4*1/1* , 5. Mr ANDREW CANT, who had been one of the minis- ters of Edinburgh, was deprived of his charge upon the discontinuance of the Episcopal establishment at the Revo- lution. He was consecrated in the same city on the 17th of October 1722, by Bishop Fullarton, now Primus, Bishop Millar, and Bishop Irvine. After the above details, it is hardly necessary to mention that the Episcopal College consists at present of the follow- ing members : The Right Reverend GEORGE GLEIG, L.L.D. &c. Primus. The Right Reverend ALEXANDER JOLLY. The Right Reverend DANIEL SANDFORD, D. D. The Right Reverend PATRICK TOREY. The Right Reverend WILLIAM SKINNER, D.D. The Right Reverend DAVID Low, L.L.D. In mentioning the act of Parliament by which, in the the year 1792, the penal laws, so long suspended over the heads of the Scottish Episcopalians, were finally repealed, I have omitted to state a circumstance, which, from not being properly understood, is supposed to have a tendency much more unfavourable than it really has, and to have sprung from considerations altogether different from those in which it actually originated. I allude to the fact, that clergymen of Scottish ordination are not allowed to hold livings, or even to officiate in England. Instead of entering into details as to the general principles involved in such a regulation, and which have been called in question by very 554 APPENDIX. competent judges, it will be enough to observe that the same restriction applies to all clergymen, even though or- dained in England by English bishops, who are appointed to discharge their professional duties in any other part of the empire, Ireland and the Isle of Man excepted. All ministers ordained for India, the West Indies, North America, and, in short, for every colony under the British crown, are placed, by act of Parliament, in precisely the same predicament as the Episcopal clergy who are ordained in Scotland. The restriction as to this last country, there- fore, has no reference whatever to the character of the or- ders which are conferred by our bishops. Such orders are every where admitted to be equally valid with those grant- ed by the archbishop of Canterbury himself ; and it is be- cause they were held equally valid on all the recognized principles of ecclesiastical institution, as well as of primi- tive practice, that a statute, on the part of the legislature, became necessary to confine the exercise of them to the country in which they are bestowed. Had they been re- garded as in the slightest degree defective in point of spi- ritual authority, no law would have been necessary to regu- late the extent of their legal competency as defined by any geographical limits. That circumstance alone would have excluded them from the establishment in the south, as well as from every Episcopal communion. In concluding this brief sketch, T feel that I have not done justice to the steady and disinterested conduct of those older members of the Scottish Episcopal church, who, through bad report, and much actual suffering, adhered firmly to the principles, both political and religious, which they believed to be founded on divine truth. With a de- gree of self-denial worthy of the primitive ages, they sub- mitted to the severest privations, and the most depressing penury, rather than depart from their ancient faith, or leave their people without that spiritual instruction, and those other means of grace upon which, from habit as well as APPENDIX. 555 from the maturest decisions of their understanding, they had been led to place a very high value. Perhaps the fol- lowing panegyric may be thought a little strained, and yet it came from the mouth of a man who was never accused of insincerity, and who certainly had no motive, on this occa- sion, to extend his complaisance to undue bounds. Bishop Home " had such an opinion," says his biographer, " of the Scottish Episcopal church, as to think that if the great Apostle of the Gentiles were upon earth, and it were put to his choice with what denomination of Christians he would communicate, the preference would probably be given to the Episcopalians of Scotland, as most like the people he had been used to." END OF APPENDIX. 557 NOTES. Note A. p. 9. St Andrews. The following is taken from the Register of St Andrews, as quoted by Dr Jamieson, in his History of the Ancient Culdees : " Omnibus sanc- te matns ecclesie filiis, Robertas Dei gratia minister humilis ecclesie Sanc- ti Andree, Salutem et cpiscopalem benedictionem. Sciant omnes, tarn presentes quam absentes, nos dedisse et concessisse ecclesie Sancti Andree et Roberto Priori, abbatiam Insula de Lochlevin, cum omnibus ad earn per- tinentibus, ad Canonicos regulares constituendum in ea ; hoc est, cum Finda- hin, et omnibus suis appendiciis ; et cum Portemuock et suis appendiciis, et cum molendinis ad pontem ; et cum uno molendino in terra Fundatbin ; et Chirtnes cum suis appendiciis omnibus ; ct cum dimidia villa de Urechecbein cum suis appendiciis ; et villa ecclesiastica de Sconin et suis appendiciis ; et cum viginti melis casei, et uno porco de Markinge ; et cum x melis et iiii melis de Breis ; et uno porco de Etmor ; et cum xx melis ordei [hordei] de Balchristin ; et cum viginli melis casei et uno porco de Bolgin filii Thoriini ; et cum decimis de domo nostra de Insula ; et cum decimis totius reddilus que recepturi sunius ad eandem domum ; et cum vestimentis ecclesiasticis qne ipsi Cheledei habuerunt; et cum liiis libris, id est; cum Pastorali, Gradual!, Missali, Origine Sententiis Abbatis Clare Vallensis tribus quaternionibus de Sacramentis, cum parte Bibliothece cum Lectionario, cum Actibus Aposto- lorum, Textu Evangeliorum, prosperotibus libris Solomonis Glossis de Canticis Canticorum, Interpretationibns Dictionum. Collectione Sententiarum, Expo- sitione super Genesim, Exceptionibus Ecclesiasticarum Regularum. Hiis testibus, Gregorio Episcopo de Dunkelden, ct Gulielmo Abbate de Sancta Cruce, et Thoraldo Archidiacono, et Matheo Archidiacono, Ajulfo Decano, Mag. Thoma, Mag*. Herberlo, Riccardo Capellano Episcopi." Reg. Sti Andr. pp. 44, 45. By Origine we are, most probably, to understand a copy or some part of the works of Origen. The next is a work doubtfully ascribed to the celebrated St Bernard, abbot of Clairvaux. Its proper title is Liber Sententiarum. The title of the following has been, Tres Qitaicrniones de Sacramentis, i. e. Three Quires or Books concerning the Sacraments. Instead of Prosperotibus libris Solomonis, we ought certainly to read Prospero, Trilius libris Solomonis ; that is, " with a copy of the works of Prosper" of Aquitain, one of the Ec- clesiastical writers of the fit'lh century. The title of the book next mentioned has been Interprelationes Dictiomtm ; but whether it was an explanation of terms used in Scripture, or a Dictionary of the Latin language, does not appear. The Collcctio Scntcnliarum must have been an eailier work than * X N 558 NOTES. the celebrated Book of Sentences of Peter Lombard, who did not flourish till some years after the subversion of this priory. Jainieson, p. 377. Note B. p. 22. The following notice is taken from the Monthly Magazine for July 1816. " The daily expenses of the bishop of St Andrews, Lamberton, and his servants, being a prisoner in Winchester castle in the year 1506, for siding with his own king, Robert Bruce, was, For the Bishop's own daily expense L..O G One man-servant to attend him 005 One boy to attend him likewise CA A chaplain to say mass to him daily 001-!,- Note C.p. 30. Mr Marline speaks highly of this Bishop, and says, (Reliquae Divi Andreae} that he furnished the college, " ad usum in sacris, calicibus, ur- ceis vel annulis, phialis, pateris, pelvibus, can thai is ad lavacrum, candela- bris, Salvatoris effigie duos prope cubitos longa, thuribulis, acereis, crucibus, aliis quoque vasibus ex argento auroque fabricatis ; sacerdotum stolis, cappis, Dalmaticis tunicis, casulis (alias planetis, genus vestis in sacris hodie ab utraque parte concisa usurpatum, ante et retro, tantum producitur usque ad talos) ex anro argentoque textili villosa bysso palmata undulata, campanis, tintinnabulisque multis dulce sonantibus, auleis byssiuis tapetibus ad tcmpli et publicarum aedium ornatum ; et verbo, nihil intus, nihil extra quod mag- num sumptum et apparatum conditoris pro dignitate et animi niiignificentia non ostenderet. His exinterate bodie, embalmed with spices, lies in the foresaid curious sepulchre he provided and built for himselfe, upon the north of the high altar in St Salvador's church." Ret. Div. And. pp. 255 4. It must be to the same bishop that the two following notices bear a refer- ence. The first is extracted from a copy of the Register of the Priory of St Andrews, in the possession of Mr Maule of Panmure ; " Anno d'ni. MCCCC lix, Jacob. K. Dei et ap'tice sede gra. eps. Sti Andr. int'uit mare apud Petyn- weme in festo S'ti Egidy abb'is, causa peregrinacionis ad s'cm Joha'em de Ameas." (Amiens ?) " Thar was ane richt gret herschipe maid in Fyff be thir personis, the Erll of Crawfurd, James of JLivingstoun, that tynie keepar to the King, and ca- pitane of Strivling, the Ogilbeis all, Robert Reach the lard of Kadyoch, and uthir syndry. And this herchippe was made on Sanctaudrois land be the maist force. And incontinent after, Rischope James Kennedy cursed so- lempnitlie with myter and staf, buke and candill, contynually a yer, and in- terdytit all the placis quhar thir personis war." Short Chronicle of the Reign of James II. The reader will not be displeased to peruse the few remaining memoranda regarding the see of St Andrews, though bis attention has not been directed to them by any particular references. NOTES. 5.59 " Thomas Arundell, Abp. of Canterbury, while an exile at Rome, had the primacy of St Andrews conferred upon him by the Pope Vid. Ang. Sac. &c. Keith has not noticed Abp. Arundell, nor " Walter deDanyelstoun, who was elected bishop of St Andrews in 1402, but died about Christmas the same year." Vid. Wyntoun's Chron. &c. " Anno D'ni M. V. xxij. Andreas Forman, legatus de latere et Eps. Sti Andree in quadragesima diem clausit extremum, et commendatarius fuit de Dunferlyn ct Pittemve) me." Harl. MS. 2363. Note E. p. ~6.Dunkeld. I had hoped to be able to remove this obscurity, but have not succeeded, and, therefore, will not trouble the reader with useless conjectures. Bishop Douglas, 1511). Ware, the Irish writer, says, that Gavin Dou- glas, bishop of Dunkeld, died of the plague in 1521, and was buried in the cliarch of the hospital of the Savoy at Westminster, in the same tomb with Thomas Halsay, bishop of .Leghlin in Ireland. He was a younger son of the sixth Earl of Angus, and was born 1475. See the Peerage, &c. Note F. p. 89. " Tnat samyn yer, (MCCCCXLIX.^ tbe xvm day of Juin, Quene Mary of Scot- land come in Scotland. And this queue was the Duke of Gillirlandis douch- ter, and sister-douchter to the Duke of Burgone. Thar come with hir xm gret schippis and ane craike, in the quhilk thar was the Ix>rd of Canfer, with xv" of men in harnes. Master Jhou Ralston, bischope of Dunkelden, and Schir William of Crechtoun, chanceler of Scotland that tyme, was the liame- bringaris of the quene, with the counsal of the King of Fraunce, the duke of Savoy, the duke of Ostrich, the duke of Bertane, the duke of Burgunye. And all tbir war bunch n in suple and manteinans of King James of Scotland. And this king forsaid and this quene war mariit at Edinburgh, the tlirid day ol'Julii the yer forsaid." Short Chronicle of the Reign of James II. Bishop Haliburton, 1662. He died 5th April 1665. Lament's Diary, 223. Bishop Guthrie, his successor, was consecrated 24th Aug. 16G5. Ibid. p. 2. Ixiij obiit Johanes Wynsist. eps. Moravien."H&v\. MS. 2363. Bishop James Stuart, 1459. The two following entries occur in Harl. MS. 2363 : " AnnoM". 4 C . Ixvj". v. die mensis Augusti obiit Jacobus Stewart eps. Moravien." " Anno M. 4c. Ixx. sexto obiit Dauid Stewart fs. predict! Jacobi epi. Mo- ravien." Bishop Alexander Stewart. 1527. Keith observes, that he is said to have died anno 1534. But, quaere, whether he was not living three years after that time, viz. in 1537. NOTES, 565 Note L. p. 169. Brecfiin. Sampson, Bp. temp. Male. IV. Ills name is written Sansane, in a charter in the archives of King's College, Aberdeen. Bishop Adam, p. 161. " David Dei gracia Rex Scotorum venerabili in Christo pa.lr\ Ade Episcopo Brechinen. cancellario nostro, salutem. Sciatisetc 1 . conci-ssiss. confinuacionem nostram Episcopo et ecclesie Brechinen. de capel- lania de Boith, *c et de ttrra de Carncortye per quond. Walterum de Maulea de Pamnur dat. et concess. quond.* Ade Episcopo Brechinen, tt ecclesie pre- notat. ac sibi de terra de Botiiiok in tenemento de Panuiur, Stc. Quarc vobis majuiuiu. Episcopum et ecclcsiain Brechinen. predict, ut faciatis curias nostras jgeperaliier vel specialiter prout velit sub niagno sigillo noslro super confirmacione nostra supradicta, &.c. Datum sub sigiilo nostro secreto apud Edinburgh vigessima die Xovembris anxo regni nostro trigesimo primo." * Jle died in 1548 (Peerage.) Kegislr Brechin. fol. (xli. This paper will be of material use in correcting the erroneous account of Bishop Ad-am, by Keith, who had not discovered that there were ttco Bishops of Bt-ech.n of that name. R. Bishop of Brechin is a witness, v.ith Robert bishop of Rots, &c. to a convention (without date^) between the abbot and convent of Arbroath and Je!m the son of Theobald, &.c. Vid. Registr. de Aberbroth, f. cxxxiii. Philip, 1551. In the archives of the city of Brechin is a charter by him, dated 16. Mar. 1350-1. Bishop Forrester, 1401. He occurs 1'Jth July U20, in Reg. Eccl. Bre- cliin, f. Ixii. Bishop John de Carnoth, 14-35. John is bishop of Brechin, anno 1429 and J 153. Reg. EC. Brechin. f. xviii. and Ixxxiii. He is styled " Conservator privilegiorum Ecclesie Scoticane." Ibid. f. Ixxii. He is mentioned as dead, anno 1459 60. Ibid. f. sxviii. The following is an entry, under the year 145G, in the Short Chronicle of Uie Reign of King James II. " Item that samyn zer it moneth ( August) deeessit in Brechyne Mast Jhone Crennok, bisehop of Brecliyae, that was callit a gud actif and verluis man, and all his tyme wele gouvemaiuL" See the printed copy of the Chronicle. William anno 1511. Omitted by Keith The following curious paper is a copy of the original preserve'1 in t'ae archives of the Viscount of Arbuihnott : " We. William, bisehop of Brechin, g'ants ws to have resauit fra our chap- lane Sir T homus Thoulace in the nam Si behave of ane honorabill man, Jaws Afbuthnotofthat ilk, tlie sovme of xxsvniarks gud and vsual moneof Scotland in hail payment of ane conrposicione of the tcynde penny of the waiid cf the manage of the said James, pertening to ws, of the qub.iik sovme we hald ws weill content and pait, and be this our acquitance, quit'clamis, and discharge the said James and all oderisof the said composiriunc and tend penny, fur novr 566 NOTES. andevir. Inwitnes of quhilk we ha\e subscribit this acquitance with our iand at Brechin the penult of Maij in the zeir of God, ane M. v\ and xj zere befor thir witnesses Maister Thos. Meldrum chancellair of Brechin, Mr William Fosryth, viccar of Montross, Maister Jhone Meldrum, parsone of Futhergill, and Mr Thomas Thoulace, with oderis divers ; and for the mair securite we haue affixit our signet to this present writ befor the said witnesses, day, zeir, and place forsaid. " WHIM'S, F.ps. (L. S.) " Brehnen. " Indorss, Acquittance of the teind penny for James Arbuthnot's waird and menage to the bischop of Brechin penult May 1511." The arms on the seal being unluckily so defaced as to be unintelligible, they cannot be of any use in endeavouring to discover the bishop's surname. William, bishop of Brechin, previously occurs, viz. 6. May anno 1500, and 29. June 1505, in Reg. EC. Brechin. f. xiv. and xlvi. The charter by Philip, bishop of Brechin, anno 1350-1, beforcmentioned, is merely a grant, with the consent of the chapter, of a piece of land in Mon- trose, to a burgess of that place. Bishop George Shorewood, 1454. He occurs 28. Jan. 1459-60, in Reg. Eccl. Brechin, f. xxviii. George, bishop of Brechin, chancellor of Scotland, previously occurs, viz. 19. Apr. 1448. Ibid. fol. 99. John, bishop of Brechin, c/iancellor, occurs 6. Sept A. R. Jac. III. 21. Ibid. f. liii. ; and previously, John is mentioned as bishop of Brechin, 17. Feb. 1466-7. Ibid. f. cxxii. Bishop Whitford, or Whiteford. He married Anne, one of the daughters of Sir John Carmichael of Car.: ichael. Wood's Peerage, I. 753. Note M. p. 183, Dunblane. John Scot, Bishop of Dunblane, is said to have anointed Edgar king of Scotland. See Hist, of Families of the name of Scot, Part I. pag. 35. Jonathan, bishop, early in the 13th cent. Vid. Registr. Prioratus, S. Andr. fol. cxlii. I. \vhere " Jonatha. epo.de Stratheren" occurs as a witness to an instrument without date. See also Mackenzie's Lives of Scots Writers. Ware, the Irish writer, observes, that John Comin, or Cumin, archbishop of Dublin, was thought by some to have been bishop of Dunblane in Scotland, and not of Dublin. He died in 1212. Robert. Vid. Dempster. Hist. EC. Scot, p 515. William, 1290. Query, whether he was not bishop of this see in the pre- ceding year, 1289? See the Letter of the Community of Scotland to Edward I. proposing a marriage between the Prince, his son, and the Maiden of Nor- way. Stephen, probably bishop of this see, early in the 14th cent. Vid. Reg. de Aberbroth. f. Ixvi. Omitted by Keith. Walter de Conentre, 1371. He is mentioned as one of those who took the NOTES. 567 oaths of homage and fealty to King Robert II. on the day after his corona- tion. Robertson's Index. This bishop is also unnoticed by Keith. F inlay, 11QS. The figure of an ecclesiastic lies on the north side of the church of Dunblane, near the east end, said to be that of Bishop Finlay. William Stephen, 1420. His surname was probably rather StepJuzn&on. Vid. Fordun, XV. 22. The following instrument appears in the Reg. of Brechin, f. IxiL : " In Dei nomine amen. Noverint univer&i, &.c. anno ab incarnacione Dei 1420. Indic- tione 13 . mensis Julii die 16'. Pontifical, sanctissimi in Christo, patris ac doniini Martini divini quidem pape quinti anno 5 J . congregata fuit apud Perth in ecclesia fratrum predicatorum s} nodus provincialis et consilium generale cleri regni Scocie prout moris et>t. In quo consiliopost missam et iuvocacionem sancti spiritus et sermonem ad clerum, concordit. electus fuit in conservato- reni previlegiorum Rcverendus in Christo pater Dns. Willm. Dei gracia Dun- blanen episco2>us, presentibus in Christo patribus dominis Dei gracia episco- pis, viz. Henrico Sancti Andree, Willielmo Glasguen. * Roberto Dunblanen. Gilbcrto Abirdonen. "VValteio Brechinen. necnon procuratotibus duorum epis- copor. Hemici Moravien. Thome Candide Case Alexandri Cathanen. ac Jo- hannis electi coiilmiiati Rossen." See. Sec. * Sic in autogr. Dunblanen, seems clearly to be an error here for Dun- kelden, as there was 110 bishop of any of the other sees, of the name of Ro- bert, at that time. It would hence appear, that Robert de Cairney had been deprived of the bishoprick of Dunkeld, and afterwards reinstated ; the see in the interim having been filled by bishop Nicholas, who was probably an Eng- lishman. But these conjectures are humbly submitted to the judgment of the learned. William Chisholm, 1564. " Gvillielmvs Chisholmevs, Dunblanensis in ScotiaEpiscopus, magno natu vir, vtpote genere Baro, sub Scotiaj defectione, Romam se conferens, atque Episcopal! dignitate se abdicans, impetrato a Summo Pontifice, qui euin ad altiora provehere studcbat, consensu, ad maiorem contendit Cartusiam; in qua Monachum professiis, ad annos aliquot, quam humillime vixit, conferens su- binde ordines macros suis fratribus. Postmodum vero Lugdunensi ac Roma- nae Cartnsiae successive praefectus, Generalis fuit Ordinis Procurator apud Sanctissimum Dominum nostrum. Quin et legatus quoq. ad Jacobum Scotiae Regem tune, nunc vero Angliae, missus ; prudentcr rem gessit. Quippe quum ex sacro fbnte olim susceperat. Obiit vero anno, MDXCIII. xxvr. Sept" Bibliotheca Cartusiana, etc. Auctore F. Theodore Petreio, in Bib. Mus. Brit. James Wedderburn, 1656. See the inscription on his grave-stone, in Dart's Hist, of Canterbury Cathedral, which is given imperfectly by Keith. The inscription is now very much defaced. He died on the 23d September lb'39, act. 54. Slezer, the author of Theatrum Scotiae, mentions & picture, (perhaps he means a monument in brass or stone,) among the grave-stones in the nave, of the Countess of Strathern, and her children, kneeling to St Bla- nus the patron. About the middle of the church lie, under three blue slabs, 568 NOTES. .->-. Margaret, the eldest daughter of John, Lord Drummond, and her two sisters, Eupheme, Lady Fleming, and Sybilla, who all died at the same time, being, as it was supposed, poisoned at a breaki'ast, in order to remove the elder, M ar- garet, of whom James IV. was so enamoured that he made her a promise of marriage, by favour of which he seduced her, and she becoming pregnant, the King would not enter into any engagement with the English Princess until her death. See Cough's Sepulchral Monuments. A copy of Keith's Catalogue, which had belonged to the late Lord Glen- bervie, has the following MS. Note, written by his Lordship. " On a tomb stone in the church-yard of Forfar, Sir William Ramsay, JBc-.rt. of Banff', in P rthshire, read and copied the following inscription : ' William Douglas, Provost of Forfar, fourth son of Robert, Bishop of Dun- blane, sixth in descent from father to son, from Archibald Earl of Angus." " N. B The Robert Douglas who gave Keith his information was the el- dest son of the Bishop by his first wife; which Robert died without issue. Syl- vester Douglas was his second, or his eldest son, by his second wife, and my grandfather. Query, As to the third son ? The present William Douglas ofBrigton is the grandson of William, Provost of Forfar, and Sir William Ramsay, the grandson of a daughter of the bishop, by his mother, who died last year (1801) aged about 80." Note N, p. \%b. Andrew Murray, Elect, 1215. See Lord Hailes's Annals. Robert, 1269. Vid. Chartul. Arbr. f. cxxxiii. Roger occurs Bishop of Ross an. 1558 _and 1350. MS. penes General Hutton. Thomas, bishop of Ross, is a witness, and appends his seal to a deed by "William Earl of Ross, 51st Oct. an. Reg. Rob. 111. See the copy in the Append, to the Lord of the Isles. Alexander, 1557. The see of Ross was vacant an. 1571. Vid. Rot Compot II. 5. Alexander, 1404. lie and the bishop of the same name above noticed were certainly different persons, the former Bishop Alexander having probab- ly died previous to the year 1371. Thomas, 1449. lie occurs Bishop of Ross in 1443. Coun. Reg. Aberd. Vol. IV. Thomas is also Bishop of Koss an. 1455. See the Ch. of Ja. VI. confuming the union of the burghs of Ilosinarky and Fortrosc, which contains a transumpt of a charter by King James 1 1. The following is among the entries under the year 1445, in the Conn. Reg. of Aberdeen, Vol. iv. ' It is to remember that the bisshop of Ross presented a letter to the bail- lies of the kyngis in this lorm the xxiii day of Nouember. " Jamys be the grace of God kyng of Scots to the aldermen & baillies of our burch of Aberdenc gretyng. It is our will and we charge zow that zc NOTES. 569 diffend &. supple a Reuerend fadder in Ciist tbe bisschop of Ross in the tak of the half net of the Rake as law will, giffit swa be that he makk sufiiciand document that he has richt tharto, and this on navvay beys ondon. Givin 011- der our signet at Strifflyn the xj day of Noueruber and of our regne the seven zer." Thomas Tulloch was Bishop of Ross, an. H-60. (Inscription on a bell at Fo~trose.) William is Electus Confirmat Rossen. 22 Mar. 141 2. Reg. Eccl. S. Kicol de Aberd. Bishop Frazer, an. 1485. He was a son of the Fam. of Fruid in Tweed- dale. MS, insertion in a copy of the Catalogue in Gen. Button's possession. In the Cathedral churc'n at Fortrose is a monument with the effigies of a bishop in pontificalibus, said to be the monument of Bishop Frazer. Bishop Cairncross, 1559 He died 50th Nov. 1515, and was buried in the cathedral church. Harl. MS. 2565. Bishop Sinclair, 1560 Vid. Dempsteri, Pref. ad Appar. Hist. Scot. Bisbop Leslie, 1565. Among the witnesses to an instrument, dated 1507, is Thomas Leslie, a canon of tbe cathedral church of Moray, and presbytery of Kingusie, who, according to a note in the hand-writing of the late Mr Rose of Moncoffer, was the father of Bishop Leslie. The see of Ross was vacant 1st March 1573-4. Chart, penes Family de Cromarty. In the Lend. Chron. 12th Oct. 1797, is an account of the discovery of the body of a bishop in the cathedral of Fortrose, supposed to have been bu- lied more than 500 years. Note 0. p. 218. Caithness. " Andr. Epo. de Katenes," is'a witness to K. William's ch. of 'protection to the burgesses of Aberdeen, without date. Bishop Andrew was the successor of Bishop John, according to the Hist of the Earldom of Sutherland. Bishop Gilbert Moray, 1222. See Hist. Earldom of Sutherland. Bishop Alan, 1299. A protection was granted under the Great Seal of Scotland, dated Aug. It. 1291, to the Bishop of Carlisle and A. Bp. of Caithness, for their joint collection of the tenths of that kingdom. Fryn. III. 450. Bishop Ferquhard, 1501. His sirname occurs variously written : Belle ganach, Deleganibe, Belleganube, Cleranumbe, Beleraumbe, &.c. An. 1 528, the see of Caithness was vacant Vid. Rot Compot &c. p. 9.2. Alexander occurs Bishop of Caithness, an. 1420. Reg. Eccl. Cath. Bre- chin. This bishop is omitted by Keith. Bishop William Moodie, or Mudy, an. 14-35. William Mudy, Bishop of Caithness, occurs an. 1469. Ch. in the Gen. Reg. House. And William, Bishop of Caithness, occurs aa. 1477, in Reg. Eccl. Brechin. Prosper, bishop of this sec, occurs an, 11-89. Coun. Reg. Aberd. 570 NOTES. Bishop John Sinclair, 14 . He was son to William the third Earl of Ork- ney. See Wood's Peerage, where he is stiled Titular Bishop of Caithness. Mr Adam Gordon, Dean of Caithness, and Parson of Pettie, Administra- tor, an. 15 . He is called Rector of Pettie, in the Hist, of the Earldom of Sutherland. He was buried in the V. Mary's Aile in the cathedral church of Elgin. Bishop Andrew Stewart, 1518. The History of the Earldom of Sutherland calls him brother to the Earl of Athole. He occurs as a witness to an instru- ment penes Vic. de Arbuthnot, dated 1522. . Bishop Robert Stewart, 1542. See Hist. Earldom of Sutherland. Robert Stewart, Bishop of Caithness, was admitted canon of Christ-Church, Canterbury, by proxy. Dart's Hist Canterbury Cathedral. Bhhop Abemethy, 1624. See Hist Earldom Sutherland, p. 582, and4S& Note. P.p. 229. Orkney. See Abercromby's Mart Achievements, II. 598. Bishop Radulfus, 1138. See Lord Hailes, An. I. 73. Bishop Edward Stewart, 1514. Edward, Bishop of Orkney, occurs an. 1509. Council Reg. Aberd. Bishop Reid, 1540. " 27 Nouebris anno 1541, Robertus Reid creatus est Episcopus Orcaden. ac consecratus in loco Minorum Edinburgi in prima doini- nica adventus domini. Statimque postea missus est legatus_cum ceteris oral- bus ad Henricum 8. Regem Anglorum. Harl. MS. 2565. In the Hist of the Earldom of Sutherland, he is said to hare died on the 15th of September 1558, and not the 14th of that month, as in the Catalogue- Bishop John Lesly, 16 . Bishop Andrew Knox, 16 . " Andrew Knox, a Scotchman, Bishop of Orkney, was translated to the see of Raphoe 26th June 1611, and was after- wards made one of the King's Privy Council in Ireland. He died 17th March 1632, 22 years after his translation. Ware's Bishops, 56. " John Lesley, D.D. born in Scotland, and Bishop of Orkney, was trans- lated to the bishoprick of Raphoe, June 1, 1653 ; and the same year made privy councillor in Ireland to King Charles I. He was translated to the see of Clogher in June 1661, and died at Glaslough in September 1671, where he buried. See Sir James Ware's Commentary of the Prelates of Ireland. He is omitted by Keith. The Marchioness of Stafford has drawn and etched some views of the ca- thedral, &c. at Kirk wall. These, with other views, and letter- press descrip- tions, entitled, " Views in Orkney, &c." form a very elegant folio volume, in the library at Dunrobin Castle. Note Q.p. 270 Glasgow. Bishop John de Cheyam, 1260. His name is also written Chicham, Chichaw, and Glenham. (Ayloffe's Calendars, &c.) " We are told by the author of the Chron. of Lanercost, that, in the year 1258, John de Glenham succeeded to the church of Glasgow, being collated thereto by the Pope, and NOTES. 571 consecrated at Rome; an Englishman bom, but 110 friend to the English: For in the latter part of his days, his covetousness increasing with his years, he pretended an ancient right in the parts of Cumberland and Westmore- land, saying that his diocese extended as far as Rerecross upon Stanemore ; and hastening, upon that occasion, to the Court of Rome, he died in his journey." Nicholson and Burns's Westmoreland and Cumberland. Bishop Robert Wiseheart, 1272. The legend of a seal of this bishop is very singular. " I have, (says General Button) an, imperfect impression of the seal. When entire, the legend is said to have run thus : REX FVRIT HEC PLORAT PATET AVRVM DVM SACER ORA.T. " "The seal is appended to a charter dated 1285. Had the time been a little latter, the commencement of the legend might be supposed to allude to the treatment the worthy bishop had experienced from Edward, wben he was his prisoner. If I am not mistaken, the same seal is appended to a charter dated some years earlier." Bishop Camtron. " Ane thousand CCCCXLVI, thar decessit iu the castall of Glasgow, Master Jhon Cameron, bischope of Glasgow, upon Yule ewyne, that was bischope six yer." Short Chronicle of the Reign of James II. Bishop Turnbull. " Item, in that samyn yer, (1449,) Master William Turnbill said his first mess in Glasgow the xx day of September." Short Chronicle of the Reign of James II. " That samyn yer, (MCCCCLI,) the privilege of the Universite of Glasgow come lo Glasgow thiow the instance of King James the Secund, and throw instigacioun of Master William Turnbull, that tyme bischop of Glasgow, and was proclamit at the croce of Glasgow, on the Trinite Scnday, the xx day of June. And on the morne thar war cryit ane gret indulgence gevin to Glasgow, at the request of thaim forsaid, be Pap Nycholas, as it war the yer of grace, and with all indulgens that thai mycht haf in Rome, contenand iiii monethis, begynnand the ix day of Julii, and durand to the x day of November. "The samyn yer, the third day of December, thar decesit in Glasgow, Master William Turnbull, bischope of Glasgow, that brocht haim the perdoun of it." Bishop Carmichael, 1482-3 See Wood's Peerage,!. 752. Bishop Erskine, 1585. See the Peerage, II. 210. Bishop Leighton, 1671. See his Letter to the Synod convened April 1673, in the Gent Mag. Sept. 1747. And see the Account of the Parish of Craig. Bishop Cairncross, 1693. "Alexander Cairncastle, (sic) Doctor of Di- vinity, Archbishop of Glasco, in Scotland, was translated," &c. as in Keith. Sir James Ware's Commentary of the Prelates of Ireland. Note R. p. 293. Galloway. In the Parish of Kirkmabrek, is a Tumulus, called the Holy Cairn, which, according to tradition, was raised over the body of the Bishop of Whithorn, who was there slain, in an engagement with the English, in 1150. Car- lisle's Topog. Diet. Christianui, Bishop, 1151. See Hist. Westmoreland and Cumberland, I. 533. 572 NOTES. jKgydius Aldiinut, Epucopiu Candidae Catae, floruit an. 1240. Dcrap- tter. Hist. EC. Scut. Thomas, l;J9t>. He also occurs bishop of this sec an. 1311. Wilkins' Concilia. This see was vacant in the 5d of King Robert Bruce See the Kind's Charter to the Prior and Convent of Whithorn, dated the 2-ith November in that year, in iiibl. Harl. 46i8 Francis Ramsity, who took the Mathurine habit at Brechin, an. 1562, was elected Bithop of Whithorn in 1575, and died in 1402, atter he had govern- ed the see 29 years. Hay's Diploni. III. 579. Andnto, 1568 Vid Rot. Couip. II. 49. QsiDaldus,Episcopua Candidae Casae, an 1592,1580? Brand's Hist. New- cast. I. 179. He granted an indulgence of 40 days to inch persons as should sa> their prayers devoutly at the church of St Andrew, Newcastle. " Dat* Eborac. in festo S. Martini, A. D. 1392 et nostrae comecratioms 1"^.' Benedict was bishop of this see when Archibald Harl of Douglas con- firmed the donation of the church of Kircum, by Dornagilla, to the abbot and convent of Sweetheart." MS. Note in a copy of the Catalogue. Bishop Gordon, 1558. See Hist. Earldom of Sutherland, Pp. 157, ITS, 172, 289, 290, &cc. The last mentioned pages contain a long account of him. And see Wood's Peerage L 647. Bishop C'oupar, 161-. In the late Mr Gouh's Library, was " The Life and Death of William Coupar, Bishop of Galloway" 1619. 4to. Bishop Sydeserf, 1654. He ordained Dr John Tillolsou, Archbishop of Canterbury. See Todd's Account of the Deans of that church, which con- tains some further particulars concerning this bishop. Bishop Aitkins, 1680. His epitaph was written by Dr Pitcairne. "Vid. Pit- carnii Pocmatu. Note S.p. 292. Argyle. Bishop Colquhowi, 1473. He is mentioned as dead an. 1493. Writs of the Burgh of Dumbarton. Bishop Fletcher, 1662. He died in March 1665. MS. inserted in the Catalogue. Bishop Maclean, 1680, His Christian name was Hector. MS. at Gor- don Castle. Lochboine is erroneously written for Lochbuie. Note T.p. 310 The Isles. " Anno 1429, obiit Simon Epis. Ilaebudensis." Vid. Orcades Torflai. Marcus, 1275. See Lord Hailes' An. I. 207. John Campbell, Bishop ofthlsles,ll . See Nisbet's Heraldry, Vol. II. 212. and Wood's Peer. I. 234-5. Bishop Gordon, 1553. Sec Wood's Peer. I. 647. Two of the bishops of the Isles were buried in the church of Rothcsay. Topog. Diet INDEX TO THE BISHOPS, &c. Page ABEL, Bp of St Andrews 17 Aberdeen, See and City of 101, 102 Aberbethie, capital of the Picts 2 Abernethy, John Bp of Caithness 217 Abraham, Bp of Dunblane 172 Adam, Bp of Brechin lol Adam, Bp of Caithness 206 Adamson, Patrick, Bp of St Andrews 40 Adrian, Bp of St Andrews 5 Aitkins, James, Bp of Moray 153,282 Alan, Bp of Argyle 286 Albin, Bp of Brechin 159 Alexander, Bp of Ross 188 Alexander, Bp of Galloway 275 Allan, Bp of the Isles 301 Alpin, Bp of Dunblane 171 Page Aluinus, Bp of St Andrews 3, 5, 6, 7 Amphibalus, Bp of the Isles 295 Andreas, Bp of Dunblane 176 Andrew, Bp of Caithness 205-212 Andrew, Bp of Orkney 222 Andrew, Bp of Galloway 274 Andrew, Bp of Argyle 286 Angusius, Bp of the Isles 504, 505 Archadiensis, Christian, Bp of the Isles . 298 Archibald. Bp of Moray 139 Archibald, Bp of Caithness 210 Argyle, See of 284 Arnold, Bp of St Andrews 10 Arnot, David, Bp of Galloway 277 1? Balfour, Sir James 5 Balfour, John, Ep of Brechin 16'4 Ballenden, Adam, Bp of Aberdeen 152 Bar, Alex. Bp of Moray HI Barnocius, al. Donortius, Bp of Aber- deen 102 Baron, Robert, Bp of Gallowoy 227 Beanus, or Beyn, First Bp of Aberd 101 Beaton, al. Bethune, James Bp of Glasgow, &c. 259, 262 Bell, William, Bp of St Andrews 24 Benham, Beruham, or Bertram, Da- vid, Bp of St Andrews 16 Benham, al. Benin, Hugh. Bp of Aberdeen 10S Bennet, James, Bp of St Andrews 25 Bethune, al. Beton, David, Cardinal and Bp of St Andrews 36 Bethune, al. Beton, James, Bp of St Andrews, kc. 55, 255, 277 Biarn, Bp of Orkney 220 Blacader, Ro , Bp of Aberd . See. 1 15, 254 Blackburn, Peter, Bp of Aberdeen 151 Bothwell, Adam, Bp of Orkney 226 Boyd, Andrew, Bp of Argyle 291 Boyd, James, Bp of Glasgow 261 Brechin, See of 156 Brice, Bp of Moray 157 Brown, George, Bp of Dunkeld 91 Bruce, Andrew, Bp of Dunkeld, Sec. 99, 229 Bruce, James, Bishop of Dunkeld and Glasgow 87,155,250 Burnet, Alexander, Bp of St An- drews, &c, 42, 265 566 INDEX. Page. Cairncross, Alexander Bp of Glas- gow, &c, 168, 269 Cairncross, Robert, Bp of Ross 190 Caithness, See of 205 Cambaslang, Walter, Bp of Dun- blane 176 Cameron, John, Bp of Glasgow 248 Campbell, Alex. Bp of Brechin lb'6 Campbell, Donald, Bp of Brechin 165 Campbell, John, Bp. of the Isles 507 Campbell. Neil, Bp of the Isles 510 Campbell, Neil, Bp of Argyle, &c. 290 Carmichael, George, Bp of Glasgow 255 Carsewell, John, Bp of the Isles 507 Cathre, or Catharus, Bp of St An- drews 1, 5, 1 Cellach, Bp of St Andrews 5 Page. Cheyne, Henry, Bp of Aberdeen 109 Chisholm, James, Bp of Dunblane 178 Chisholm, William, Bp of Dunblane 179, 180 Christianus, Bp of Galloway 272 Clement, Bp of Dunblane 172 Cockburn, Robert, Bp of Ross 190 Colquhoun, Robert, Bp of Argyle 288 Conindicus, Bp of the Isles 295 Connacus, Bp of Dunkeld 75 Coupar, William, Bp of Galloway 280 Crail, Adam, Bp of Aberdeen 106 Crichton, George, Bp of Dunkeld 91 Crichton, Robert, Bp of Dunkeld 96 Cuningham, David, Bp of Aberdeen 151 Cuniugham, Yt iiiiiiin. Bp of Argyle 289 David, Bp of Dunkeld 80 David, Bp of Moray 14-5 David, Bp of Argyle 287 Dolgfinnus, Bp of Orkney 221 Donortius, al. Barnocius, Bp of Aberdeen 102 Dougal, Bp of Dunblane 176 Douglas, Alexander, Bp of Moray 152 Douglas, Gavin. Bp of Dunkeld 93 Douglas, George, Bp of Morny 151 Douglas, John, Bp of St Andrews 59 Douglas, Robert, Bp of Brechin 168 Douglas, Robert, Bp of Dunblane 185 Druramond, James, Bp of Brechin 169 Duiibar, Columba, Bp of Moray 143 Dunbar, Gavin, Bp of Aberdeen 119 Dunblane, See of 170 Duncan, Bp of Dunkeld 81 Dunkan, John, Bp of the Isles 501 Dunkeld, See of, Bp of Dunkeld 75 Durie, Andrew, Bp of Galloway 278 Dthac, Bp of Ross 186 De Balmyle, Nicolas, Bp of Dun- blane 174 D De Baltrodde. Walt. B. of Glasg. 219 De Belleganach, Ferquhard, Bp of Caithness 212 De Bidun, Walter, Bp of Dunkeld 76 De Bondington, Win. Bp of Glasg. 258 De Cairney, Robert, Bp ofDunkeld 85 DC Caraolh, John Bp of Brechin 165 De Cheyam, John, Bp of Glasgow 240 De Crambeth, Malt. Bp of Dunkeld 81 De Deyn, Wm. Bp of Aberdeen 110 De Dundemore, Steph. Ep of Glasg 242 De Dundemore, Thomas, Bp of Ross 187 De Fifyne, Thomas, Bp of Ross 187 De Fingask, Tho. Bp of Caithness 215 De Kilconcath, Wm. Bp of Brechin 159 De Kyninmond; Alex, Bp. of Aber. Ill De Kyninmoud, Jo. Bp of Brechin 160 De Lambley, Randolf, Bp of Abd. 107 De Lanark, Ad Bp of Galloway, 274 De Leighton, Hen. Bp of Aberd. 115 De Leuchars, Pat. Bp of Brechin 162 De Linton, Bernard, Bp of the Isles 502 Dt MoiTa, Nitol, Bp of Glasgow 240 1XDEX. 567 n Page. De Moravia, or Moray, Andrew, Bp of Moray 138 DC Pay, Stephen, Bp of St Andrews 26 De Potton, Rich, Bp of Aberd. 108 De Piasbenda, Richard, Bp of Dun- keld, Sic. 74, 77 De Pnebeuda, Rob. Bp of Dunb. 173 De Ramsey, Peter, Bp of Aberdeen 107 Page. De Roxburgh, Hugo, Bp of Glasg. 256 De Sigillo, Hugo, or Hew, Bp of- Dunkeld 78 De Stuteville, Rob. Bp of Dimkeld 81 De Tinningbam, Ad. Bp of Aberd. 1 1 1 De Tonei, Simeon, Bp of Moray 136 De Tulloch, Thomas, Bp of Orkney 221 E Eadmerus, Bp of St Andrews 4, 6, 7 Edinburgh, See of, and Erection 44 Edmarus, Bp of St Andrews 4, 7 Edmundus, Bp of St Andrews 5 Edumerus, Bp of St Andrews 5 Edward, Bp of Aberdeen 104 Edward, Bp of Brechin 160 Eliscaeus, Bp of Galloway 274 Elphinston, Wm. Bpof Aberd. 115,189 Erskine, Wm. Bp of Glasgow 262 Ethelbertus, Bpof Galloway 271 Evaldus, Bp of Argyls 284 Fairfowl, Andrew, Bp of Glasg. 265 Fairley. James, Bq of Argyle 291 Falconer, Colin, Bp of Moray, 154, 2.92 Felix, Bp of Moray 155 Ferquhard, Bpol the Isles 50il Finlay, Bp of Dunblane 176 Finlay, Bp of Arg;. le 287 Fletcher, David, Bp of Argyle 291 Florentius, Bp of Glasgow 236 Forbes, Alex. Bp of Aberdeen 131, 217 Forbes, Patrick, Bp of Aberdeen 152 Forbes, Patrick, Bp of Caithness 218 Forbes, William, Bp of Edinburgh 60 Fordun, the Historian 5 Foreman, And, Bp of St And. 55, 146 Forrester, Waller, Bp of Brechin 163 Foudauche, Bp of St Andrews 5 Fotauche, Bp of St Andrews 5 Fothach, Bp of St Andrews 5 Fothad, Bp of St Andrews 5, 6 Fothald, Bp of St Andrews 7 Frazer, John, Bp of Ross 183 Frazer, William. Bp of St Andrews 20 Frethewaldus, Bp of Galloway 271 Galfrid, Bp of Aberdeen 104 Galloway, See of 271 Gamaliel, Bp of the Isles 297 Gameline, Bp of St Andrews 18 Germanus, Bp of the Isles 295 Gilbert, Bp of Dunkeld 79 Gilbert, Bp of the Isles 501 Gilbert, Bp of Brechin 158 Gilbert, Bp of Galloway 272 Gladstanes, George 41, 217 Glasgow, See of 250 Glendoning, Matthew, BpofGlas. 246 Godricus, or Godericus, Bp of St Andrews 4, 5, 6, 7 Goldwork of the Cathedral of Aber. 129 Gordon, Adam, Bp of Caithness 214 Gordon, Alex. Bp of Aberdeen 119 Gordon, Alex. Bp of Galloway 279 Gordon, Alex. Bp of the Isles 507 Gordon, John, Bp of Galloway 283 Gordon, William Bp of Aberd, 122 Graham, Andrew, Bp of Dunb. 180 568 TXDEX. G Page. Graham, Archibald. Bp of the Isles 510 Graham, George, Bp of Duinbiane and Orkney 181, 227 Graham, Patrick, Bp of St And. 50 Greenlaw, Gilb. Bp of St And. 28, 112 Gregorius, Bp of St Andrews 4, 5, 6 Gregory, Bp of Dunkeld Gregory, Bp of Moray Gregory, Bp of Ross Gregory, Bp of Brechiu Guthry, Henry, Bp of Dunkeid Guthry, John, Bp of Moray 75,75 155 184 158 8 152 H Hadrianus, Bp of St Andrews 5 Henry, Bp of Ross Haliburton, Geo. Bp of Aberd. 154-, 168 Heury, Bp of Orkney Ilaliburton, George, Bp of Dunk. Hamilton, David, Bp of Argyle Hamilton, Gav. Bp of Galloway Hamilton, Ja. Bp of Galloway Hamilton, Ja. Bp of Argyle Hamilton, John, Bp of St And. Hamilton, John, Bp of Dunkeld Hamilton, John, Bp of Dunkeld Harald, Bp of Argyle Hay, James, Bp of Hoss Hay, William Bp of Ross Ingleram, Bp of Glasgow Inglis, Alexander, Bp of Dunkeld Innes, Father, Bp of St Andrews Innes, John, Bp of Moray Joceline, Bp of Glasgow Jofrier, Bp of Orkney John, Bp of Dunkeld John, Bp of Aberdeen John, Bp of Ross John, Bp of Caithness John, Bp of Glasgow John, Bp of Galloway 98 88 83 281 281 58 95 100 285 190 195 Henry, Bp of Galloway 189 220 275, 278 Hepburn, Geo. Bp of the Isles 505 Hepburn, James, Bp of Moray 148 Hepburn, Jo' n, Bp of Brechin 165 Hepburn, John, Bp of Brechiu 178 Hepburn, Patrick, Bp of Moray 150 Herbert, Bp of Glasgow 232 Hervy or Haufir, Bp of Orkney 220 Honyman, Andrew, Bp of Orkney 228 Hugo, Bp of Brechin IcS I 258 91 5 142 J 2.">5 220 81 105 187 206 272 K Innes, John, Bp of Caithness 214 Inverkeithing, Richard, Bp of Dun. 89 Isles, See of the John, Bp of Argyle John, Bp of the Isles John, Bp of the Isles John, Bp of the Isles John, Bp of the Isles John and Hugh, Bp of St And. Jonathan, Bp of Dumblane Kalendar of Scots Saints, their several Festivals 575 Kellach, al. Kellarich, Bp of St Andrews 5, 5, 6 Kennedy, Ja. Bp of St Andrews 29, 87 Kentigera, Bp of Glasgow 250 Kings of Scotland, list of them, when began to reign Knox, Andrew, Bp of the Isles Knox, Thomas, Bp of the Isles Kyiminniuud, Alex. Bp of Aberd. 295 288 297 299 504- 505 12 171 575 5C8 508 110 IKDEX. 569 Page. Laing, John, Bp of Glasgow 253 Lamb, And. Bpof Brech. &c. 167, 281 Lamberton, Wil. Bp of St And. 21 JLandal, Wil. Bp of St And. 24 Lauder, Alex. Bp of Dunkeld 87 Lauder, George, Bp of Argyle 287 Lauder, Robert, Bp of Dunb. 177 Lauder, Thomas, Bp of Dunkeld 89 Lauder, William, Bp of Glasg. 247 Laurentius, Bp of Dunblane 170 Laurentius, Bp of Argyle 286 Laurentius, Bp of the Isles 299 Laurie, Robert, Bp of Brechin 168 Law, Ja. Bp of Orkney, &c. 227, 264 Leicester, John of, Bp of Dunk. 78 Page. Leighton, Henry, Bp of Moray 142 Leighton, Robert, Bp of Glas. 182, 266 Lesly, Charles, Bp of the Isles 508, 509 Lesly, John, Bp of Ross 194, 200 Lesly, John, Bp of the Isles 508 Lesly, William, Bp of the Isles 509 Lindsay, Ales. Bp of Dunkeld 98 Lindsay, David, Bp of Edin. 61, 167 Lindsay, David, Bp of Ross 201 Lindsay, John, Bp of Glasg. 243 Lindsay, Ingeram, Bp of Aberd. 114 Lindsav, Patrick, Bpof Glasg. 202, 264 Lindsay, William, Bp of Dunkeld 99 Liverance, Galfrid, Bpof Dunkeld, 79 Livingstown, Ja. Bp of Dunkeld 90 L M Macbeth, Bp of Ross 184 Mackenzie, Murd. Bp of Orkney 152, 228 Maclean, Bp of Argyle 292 Maclean, Rod. Bp of the Isles 307 Macnaughton, Donald, Bpof Dunk. 86 Makdowny, Makgillanderis, Bp of St Andrews 5 Malcolm, Bp of Caithness 213 Malduinus, Bp of St And. 4, 5, 6, 7 Mali.-,ius, or Malyss, Bp of St And. 5, 5, 6, 7 Malmore, Bp of St Andrews 3, 5, 6. 7 Malvoisin, Wil. Bp of St And. 10, 256 Man, Alexander, Bp of Caith. 213 Mar, Robert, Bp of Brechin 158 Marcus, Bp. of the Isles 300 Martin 278 Matthaeus, or Machabaeus, Bp of Ross 186 Matthew, Bp of Aberdeen 104 Mauritius, Bp of Dunblane 175 Maxwell, John, Bp of Ross 202 Maxwell, Robert, Bp of Orkney 223 Meldrum, Walter, Bp of Brechin 164 Michael, Bp of Galloway 274 Michael, Bp of the Isles 298, 504 Mitchel, David, Bpof Aberdeen 153 Moodie, William, Bp. of Caith. 214 Monro, Alex. Bp of Argyle 292 Montgomery, Robert, Bp of Glas. 261 Montgomery, Robert, Bp of Argyle 289 Monymusk, Mich. Bp of Dunk. 84 Moray, Andrew, Bp of Ross 185 Moray, David, Bp of Moray 140 Moray, Gilbert, Bp of Caithness 207 Moray, See of, 155 Mortlich, or Murthlack, Bp of Aberdeen 101 Muirhead, Andrew, Bp of Glas. 252 Nectanus, Bp of Aberdeen Nicolas, Bp of Caithness Nicolas Bp of the Isles. N 102 Nicolson, James, Bp of Dunkeld 98 210 Ninian, Bp of Galloway 271, 276 2S8 570 INDEX. Page. Ochiltree, Michael, Bp of Dunb. 177 Octa, Bp of Galloway 271 Onacus, Bp of the Isles 501 Orkney, See of Osbert, Bp of Dunblane Page. 2:9 172 Paniter, aL Panter, David, Bp of Ross 192 Parishes in Scotland 511 Paterson, John, Bp of Glasgow, &c. 64, 203, 270, 282 Paton, James, Bp of Dunkeld 9ij Pecthelmus, Bp of Galloway 271 Peebles, John, Bp of Dunkeld 85 Petnis, Bp of Orkney 2 ;0 Philip, Bp of Brechin 162 Pectuiuas, Bp of Galloway '211 Pilmore, John, Bp of Moray 140, 187 POPES, List of them, and date of their advancement from anno 1000 573 Porterfield, John, Bp of Glasy. K60 Prosper, Bp of Caithness 214 11 Radulfus, Bp of Moray, &c. 157, 172, 220 Radvnlf, Bp of Galloway 272 Rae, Bp of Glasgow 244 Rait, Bp of Aberdeen 1 1 1 Ramsay, Jas. Bp of Ross, Sec. 183, 204 Raulston, al. Ralphston, al. Rale- ston, John, Bp of Dunkeld 88 Regulus, Bp of St Andrews 1 Reid, Robert, Bp of Orkney 223 Reinaldus, al. Reginaldus, Bp of Ross, Sec. &c. 185, 298, 299 Revolution, a Letter concerning it 65 Richard, Bpof St Andrews, &c. 11, 80 Richard, Bp of Moray 136 Richard, Bp of the Isles 500 Robert, Bp of Brechin 160, 165 Robert, Rp of Ross, &c. 185. 183, 187 Robert, Bp of the Isles 5('5 Robert, Bp of Dunkeld, &c. 91, 3U5 Robertus, Bp of St Andrews 4, 5, 6. 8 Roger, Bp of St Andrews 15 Rogerus, Bp of Ross 187 Rollock, Peter, Bp of Dunkeld 97 Romulus, Bp of the Isles 2.')5 Roolwer, Bp of the Isles 296 Rose, Alex. Bp of Moray 154 Ross, Alex. Bp of Edinburgh 64 Ross, Arthur, Bp of St Andrews. &c. 43, 269, *8'2, 291 Ross, See of 184 Ruddiman, Tho. Bp of St Andrews <> Russel, "William, lip of the Isks 303 St Andrew, Tutelar Saint of Scot- land 1 St Andrews, See of 1 St Bladus, Bp of the Isles 296 St Brendinus, ditto 296 St Conan, ditto 296 St Contentus, ditto 296 St Edmunds, Allan, Bp of Caith. 211 St Malthus, Bp of the Isles 2.% St Machatus, ditto ?95 St Ninian, Bp of Galloway 27 1 Sampson, Bp of Brechin 156 Schaw, Robert, B. of Moray 148 Schives, Wm. Bp of St Andrews 52 Scot, John, Bp of Dunkeld 76 Sfothad, Bp of St Andrews 5 IN'DEX. 571 Page Scot, Matthew, Bp of Dunkeld, &c. 79, 106 Scougal, Patrick, Bp of Abed. 155 Scrogie, W m. Bp of Argyle 291 Sharp James, Bp of St Andrews 41 Shouswood, Geo. Bp of Brechin 164 Sibbald, Sir Rob. Historian, &.c. 5, 10 Silver Work of the Cathedral of Aberdeen 129 Simon, Bp of Moray 1 33 Simon, Bp of Dunblane 171 Simon, Bp of Galloway 275 Simon, Bp of the Isles 299 Simon, Bp of Ross 181 Sinclair, Henry, Bp of Ross 195 Sinclair, John, Bp of Brechin lfa'5 Sinclair, John, Bp of Caithness 214 Sinclair, William, Bp of Duukeld 82 Spence, Thomas, Bp of Aberdeen 114 Spence, Thomas, Bp of Galloway 275 Spottiswood, John, Bp of St An- drews &c. 5, 41, 265 Spottiswood, John, Bp of Glasg 142 Page Spynie, William, Bp of Moray 142 Stephen, Bp of Brechin 162 Stephen, Bp of the Isles 500 Stephen, William, Bp of Dunblane 177 Steward, Alex. Bp of St Andrews 55 Steward, James, Bp of St Andrews 52 Steward, Thomas, Bp of St Andrews 27 Stewart, Alex. Bp of Moray 119 Stewart, Andrew, Bp of Moray 145 Stewart, Andrew, Bp of Caithness, &c. 214, 215 Stewart, David, Bp of Moray 144 Stewart. Edward, Bp of Orkney 225 Stewart, James, Bp of Moray 144 Stewart, Robert, Bp of Caithness 215 Stewart, William, Bp of Aberd. 121 Stirline, Gilbert, Bp of Aberd. 106 Strachan, David, Bp of Brechin 1H7 Strathbrock, Rob. Bp of Caithness 214 Stuart, Andrew, Bp of Dunkeld 95 Syciserf, Thomas, Bp of Orkney, &c. 228, 81 Thomas, Bp of Dunblane 178 Thomas, Bp of Ross 189 Thomas, Bp ot Orkney 225 Thomas, Bp of Galloway, &c. 275, 274 Thomas, Bp of the Isles Torkinus, Bp of the Isles Trail, Walter, Bp of St Andrews Tualde, Bp of St Andrews Tuchald, Bp of St Andrews Urquhart, Thomas, Bp of Ross Vans, George, Bp of Galloway Wallace, Robert, Bp of the Isles Walter, Bp of St Andrews Walter, Bp of Dunkeld Walter, Bp of Glasgow 505 296 25 5 4 Tulloch, Tho. Bp of Orkney 221, 225 Tulloch, William, Bp of Moray 1 45 Tulloch, William, Bp of Orkney 222 Turgotus, Bp of St And. Sec. 4, 5, 6, Turnbull, William, Bp of Glasgow, &c. 88, 251 Turpin, Bp of Brechin 156 Tuthaldus, Bp of St And. &c. 5, 6, 7 U Sc V 189 Vestments of the Cathedral of Aber- 576 deen 127 W 510 Walter, Bp of Galloway 272 9 Wardlaw, Henry, Bp of St Andrews $.'8 85 Wardlaw, Walter, Bp of Glasg. 246 2.17 Wedderburn. James, B. of Daub. 18! 572 INDEX. W Page Whitford, Walter, Bp of Brechin 167 "William, Bp of Moray 135 William, Bp of Brechin 160 William, Bp of Dunblane, &c. 172, William, Bp of Orkney, Sec. 220, 221. 222 William, Bp of Argyle 286 William, Bp of the Isles 296 174, 175 William, Bp of Caithness 210 Page Winchester, John, Bp of Moray 145 Winton, Andrew, Historian 5 Wiseheart, George, Bp of Edin. 62 Wiseheart. John, Bp of Glasg. 243 Wiseheart, Robert, Bp of Glasg. 241 Wishart, al. Wiseheart, William, &c. 19, 241 Wood, Andrew, Bp of Caithness, Sec. 218, 310 Wymundus. Bp of the Isles 297 Young, Alexander, Bp of Edin- York, Archbishop of, urged to be burgh, &.c. 64, 204 the Metropolitan over all Scot- Young, John, Bp of Argyle 291 land, and rejected 207 APPENDIX. LIST OF BISHOPS SINCE THE REVOLUTION. Page Alexander, John, Bp of Dunkeld 559 Campbell, Archibald, Bp of Aberd. 530 Cant, David, Bp of Glasgow 555 Drummond, Abernethy, Hawthom- den, Bp of Edinburgh 529, 545 Dunbar, Wm. Bp of Aberd. 532 541 Duncan, Alex. Bp of Glasg. 552 Edgar, Henry, Bp of rife 549 Fullarton, John, Bp of Edin. 524 Freebairn, David, Bp of Edin. 527 Falconer, William, Bp of Edin- burgh 528, 541, 550 Forbes, Robert, Bp of Caithness and Orkney 550 Gadderar. James, Bp of Aberd. 531 Gerrard, Andrew, Bp of Aberd. 533 Gleig, George, Bp of Brechin 546 Gillans, John, Bp of Dunblane 546 Jolly, Alexander, Bp of Moray 523 Innes, George, Bp of Brechin 545 Kilgour, Robert, Bp of Aberd. 554 Page Keith, Rob. Bp of Fife 548, 550 Lumsden, And. Bp of Edin. 526 L.OW, Dav, Bp of Ross &c Argyle 551 Millat, Arthur, Bp of Ediu. 526 Macfarlane, Andrew, Bp of Mo- ray 542, 551 Norrie, Robert, Bp of Ghsg. 532 Ouchterlonie, John, Bp of Brechin 543 Petrie, Arthur, Bp of Moray 542 Rattray, Thomas, Bp of Dunkeld 537 Ross, Charles, Bp of Dunkeld 540 Raitt, James, Bp of Brechin 544 Rose, James, Bp of Glasgow 552 Ranken, David, Bp of Glasg. ib. Sandford, Daniel, Bp of Edin. 529 Skinner, John, Bp of Aberd, 534 Skinner, William, ditto, Sec. 536 Strachan, John, Bp of Brechin 545 Torry. Patrick, Bp of Dunkeld 541 Watson, Jonath. Bp of Dunkeld 540 White, Rob. Bp of Dunblane 547,549 INDEX TO THE RELIGIOUS HOUSES IN SCOTLAND, (HOSPITALS AND COLLEGIATE CHUKCHES INCLUDED.) A Page. .Page. ABERBROTHOCK - - 408 Aboyne 4,35 Aberdeen 395, 445, 451, 455, 474 Air 442, 452 Abernethy - 393 St Andrews 387,446,451,456 Aberdour - - 464 Ardchattan - - 428 B Balantradock 435 Biggar - 465 Balmerinach - 423 Blaitire - - 390 Ballencrieff - 474 Botham 466 Banff - - 456 St Bothans - - 460 Beaulieu - - 427 Bothvvell - - 466 Berwick - 397, 442, 448, 460 Brechin - 397, 475 Calchon, or Kelso Coldstream Ca mbuskenneth C andida Casa Canonby Carail . Carlisle Camwath Chapel Royal in Striveling Charter-house Coldingham Dalkeith Dalmulin Deer Dirleton 405 Colmes-Inch 236 461 Colmoci, Insuli Sti - - 391 390 Colmsay - - 390 399 Corstorphin - -i; 467 392 Coupar 419, 445 467 Crichton - W 467 389, 459 Cromarty - ; -o,i 397 466 Crosraguel - - 413 472 Cross-church of Peebles - 397 430 Crusay - .,,., 390 401, 465 Culross - .- . 422 D 467 Dornock 397 459 Dryburgh - 399 442 Dumbarton - 468 467 Dumfries -,', - 448 TXDF.X. D Page. Dunbar 3.96, 455, 467 Dimfermline Dundee 357, 445, 449, 464 Dunglas Dundrenan - 417 E Eccles - 461 Elbottle Edinburgh 441, 450, 475 Elcho Ednem 475 Elgin F Failfurd 396 Foulis Feale 413 Fyvie Ferae h'iJ, - 400 Page. 402 468 460 465 444, 453 468 410 St Germans - 435, 475 Greenside St Giles's - 468 Guleine Glasgow - 446, 451, 475 Guthry Glenluce - 421 457 461 468 Haddington Halystone Hamilton Holme 449, 462 Holyroodhouse 459 Holywood 469 Houston 417 589 399, 476 396, 476 Icolmkill Inchafiray Inch- Col me Inchmahome 414, 458 Incliynan 392 Inverkeithing 383 Inverness 391, 394 Irvine 435 450 444 456 St James's Kelso v. Calchon Kilmaurs Kilmund KQ winning Kincardine O'Neil 476 Jedburgh K 405 King- case 469 Kirkcudbright 469 Kirk-heugh 407 Kyllenross 476 Kynloss 392, 455 *76 450 469 422 418 INDEX. 575 Lancrk Lauder St Leonards Lesmabagow Ligerswood Lincluden Macliline . Manuel Maryculter St Mary Magdalen St Mary's Fields St Mary's Isle St Mary's Wynd Xetv bottle New burgh Newcastle Osgerston Page. 449, 476 Lindores 476 Linlithgow 464, 477 Loch Feal 407 Loch Levin 477 Loch Tay 459, 470 Luffiiess M 426 May, Isle of 461 Melross 435 Methven 477 Minniboil 470 St Mouans 58.9 Monimusk 4G4 Montrose N 417 St Nicolas 477 North Berwick 459 O 435 Oronsay Page. 411 455 397 587 385 3.97 415 470 470 445 588 443 477 463 590 Paisley Peebles Perth Queensferry Restalrig Restennot Roseneth Rosline 412 Pittenweem 597 Pluscardine 445, 4555 Portmoak Q R 471 Rothfan 592 Rowadill 391 Roxburgh 471 Rutherfoord S St Salvator's College in St And. 472 Scarinche Sandale 421 Scone Santray - - 479 Scotland Well 588 427 588 455 478 390 448, 478 478 393 385 396 576 INDEX S Selkirk v. Chalchon Semple Senewar Seton . Siens, near Edinburgh Soul's Seat Page. 406 Spittels 473 Strathfillan Striviline 478 Page. 479 593 444, 453, 472 472 Suggeden 479 Sweet Heart, or Dulcis Cordis 424 598 Tayne '.- Temple Three Fountains Trinity College of Edinburgh Tullibardine Urcnihart Whitehorn Tester, or Zester 473 Tullilum 435 Tulloeh 460 Tungland 475 Tiirriff 473 U w 599 "Wigton Y Z 435 435 400 479 404 445 475 THE END. John Afotr, Printer, Edinburgh, 1824. BOOKS PUBLISHED BY BELL & BRADFUTE, 6, Parliament Square, Edin- burgh ; A. BROWN & Co. Aberdeen ; and C. & J. RIVINGTON, London. 1. CAMPBELL'S (PHINCIFAL, of Aberdeen) DISSSERTA- T1ON ON MIRACLES, containing an Examination of the Principles ad- vanced by DAVID HUME, Esq. in an Essay on Miracles; with a Correspon- dence on the subject by Mr HUME, Dr CAMPBELL, and Dr BLAIR. To which are added Sermons and Tracts. A NEW EDITION, Elegantly printed, in one Vol. 8vo. 10s. 6d.bds. 1825. 2. FOUR GOSPELS, Translated from the Greek, with Preliminary Dissertations, and Notes, Critical and Explanatory. T 1 Page cv. line 2, insert not after did. 5. COOK'S, (Gtfo.) G,cvr,rv.a.ij aim of CHRISTIANITY, comprehending; its Origin and Progress, the leading Doctrines and Form of Polity founded on it, and the effect which it has pro- duced on the Moral and Political State of Europe ; 5 Vols, 8vo, 1822. L.I 16s. boards. 6. HISTORY of tbe REFORMATION in SCOT- LAND, with an Introductory Book, and an Appendix. 5 Vols, 8vo. SECOND EDITION. L.1 16s. 7. HISTORY of the CHURCH of SCOTLAND, from the Establishment of the Reformation till the Revolution ; illustrating a most interesting period of the Political History of Britain. 5 Vols, 8vo, L.I 16s. 8. ILLUSTRATION of the GENERAL EVI- DENCE establishing the REALITY of CHRIST'S RESURRECTION. 8vo, 7s. 9. LIFE of the late GEORGE HILL, D. D., Prin- cipal of St Mary's College, St Andrews. With a portrait. 8vo, 10s. 6d. 10. ESSAYS ON VARIOUS SUBJECTS, RELIGIOUS & MO- RAL ; the Practical Application of their Principles to the State of Man in So- ciety, particularly the Lower Orders ; and Connecting them wfth what ought to constitute their Duties as Citizens, Subjects, and Christians. By a LAYMAN. 5 Vols. 8vo. SECOND EDITION. L.I, 11?. 6d, Books published by Bell and Bradfute,