HB /03 C6 Ia/4 UC-NRLF B H bis 7MS in o t^ ONE PENNY. :OBDEN'S WORK AND OPINIONS BY LORD WELBY AND SIR LOUIS MALLET -^T^ ^!W 28, VICTORIA STREET LONDON, S.W. MAY, 1904 COBDEN CLUB LEAFLETS. (2 pp. Leaflets, 3s.; 4 pp., 5s.; 8 pp., los. per 1,000.) 168 Cobden on Retaliation. 4 pp. 167 Cobden on International Peace. 8 pp. 166 Cobden on Armaments and Expenditure. 8 pp. 165 The Candlemakers' Petition. After Bastiat. 4 pp. 164 Engineering and Free Trade. By G. N. Barnes. 4 pp. 163 Imports and Exports. By Russell Rea, M.P. 4 pp. 162 ''Ruined" Industries. IV. —The Silk Trade. By Matthew Blair. 4 pp. 161 The Canadian Premier and Free Trade. 2 pp. 160 Commercial Travellers and Free Trade. 4 pp. 159 Retaliation, Is it Feasible ? By Sydney Buxton, M.P. 8 pp. 158 My Sentiments on the Fiscal Question. By Alfred Morris. 4 pp. 157 Co-operation and Free Trade. 2 pp. 156 "Ruined" Industries. III.— The Brass Trades. By J. CUTHBERTSON. 4 pp. 155 Those Foreign Doors. By Henry Vivian. 4 pp. 154 "Ruined" Industries. II.— The Tinplate Trade. By Sir J. J. JENKIN. 8 pp. 153 The Swedish Workman. By James Calvert. 4 pp. 152 " Ruined " Industries. I. — The Iron and Steel Trade. By James Cox. 4 pp. 151 The German Workman. By the Rev. T. Capel Hanbury. 4 pp. 150 Mr. Chamberlain and the Cobden Club. 4 pp. 149 The Cotton Trade and Protection. By C. W. Macara. 4PP- 148 The Humours of Protection. By Lord Welby. 4 pp. 147 How Long Will He Stay ? 2 pp. 146 A Protectionist Paradise. 2 pp. 145 German Exports and German Wages. 2 pp. 144 Appeal from Labour Representatives. 4 pp. 143 The Zollverein Scheme. By Sir Swire Smith. 8 pp. 142 The Burden of Empire. 4 pp. 141 Mr. Chamberlain on the Canadian Tariff. 4 pp. 140 Mr. Balfour on Protection. 2 pp. 139 Food and Folly. By Harold Cox. 12 pp. 138 A Shipowner on Shipping Subsidies. 4 pp. 135 Shipping Subsidies. By Sir Spencer Walpole, K.C.B. 8 pp. 134 The Benefits of Free Trade. By Albert Spicer. 8 pp. 128 A Century of British Exports. With Diagram. 4 pp. 127 Why I am a Free Trader. By Sir J. H. Simon, K.C.M.G. 2 pp. 123 The Canadian Preferential Tariff. By Harold Cox. 8 pp. 122 Free Trade and Prosperity. 4 pp. 118 Taxation of Commodities. 4 pp. 117 The Forgotten Factor. By Lord Farrer. 4 pp. 97 Wages and Protection. By Geor(;e W. Medley. 2 pp. 53 Sir Robert Peel on "One-Sided Free Trade." 2pp. 42 The Good Old Times. 2 pp. 28 Free Trade or Fair Trade } By James E. Thorold Rogers. 2 pp. 22 Less Free Trade or More ? By J. Hampden Jackson. 2 pp. 14 Taxing Foreign Wheat. By George W. Medley. 4 pp. COBDEN'S WORK AND OPINIONS BY LORD IWELBY ^^yy^^Jcl Ea AND \ ' SIR LOUIS MALLET •SsM 28, VICTORIA STREET LONDON, S.W. MAY, 1904 I COBDEN'S WORK AND WRITINGS By Lord Welby.^ The State is a severe mother. She demands from her noblest sons their intellects, their energies, and, if need be, their lives ; but she is not ungrateful. The men who have guided her destinies live in grateful memory and in memory the more honoured if to great service and lofty aims they have added disregard of self, direct- ness of purpose, and simplicity of character. Such men become household words of the nation. They create the standard by which the nation measures itself, and by which it is measured. They strike the keynote of national character. Such a man was Richard Cobden, a type of a great Englishman to EngHshmen of all times, a type in his truthfulness, in his simplicity, and in his devotion to the welfare of his countrymen. It is nearly forty years since he passed away, and in the interval much has happened. During his youth and the prime of his manhood, the people were suffering under the results of the Great War. Excessive taxation weighed upon all classes, but more especially upon the wage-earning and poorer classes. The progress of the nation was hampered by bad laws and unwise restric- tions. The condition of the poor was miserable, for employment w\as scarce, wages were low, and food was * Being the preface to "The PoHtical Writings of Richard Cobden" (Fisher Unwin, 1903), with the omission of a few phrases. 3 M323567 4 CoBDEifs Work and Writings clear. Education was neglected, and little had been done to make the mass of the people fit for the citizen- ship of a great and free country. This was the condition of the nation as Cobden knew it. He saw that improve- ment was impossible as long as the labouring classes were ill-fed and often unemployed, and he threw him- self with all his soul into the fight for free trade and cheap food. The tale of the fight is admirably told in Morley's Life of him. As one reads it, one is struck by the tact, the resource, the vigour and statesmanship of the man. Protection ruled in trade and agriculture, and the protected interests were to a man against him. But his chief foe was the agricultural interest. The great landowners were arrayed against him. The fight was long and severe, but Free Trade triumphed in the end and Cobden was the leader of the victorious party. There is no passage in the records of Parliamentary debate more striking than the oft-quoted tribute which in the hour of his triumph Sir Robert Peel paid to him. " The name which ought to be associated with the success of our measures of commercial policy is not the name of the noble lord, the organ of the party of which he is the leader, nor is it mine. The name which ought to be, and will be, associated with the success of those measures is the name of one who, acting, I believe, from pure and disinterested motives, has, with untiring energy, made appeals to our reason, and has enforced those appeals with an eloquence the more to be admired because it was unaffected and unadorned : the name which ought to be chiefly associated with the success of those measures is the name of Richard Cobden.'' The verdict of posterity has confirmed the judgment of Sir Robert Peel. It has associated inseparably and for ever the name of Cobden with the great Act of 1846. Many men and many interests then contested and now contest the policy of that Act, but generous opponents have never questioned the power, the energy, and the singlemindedness with which he fought the fight. Six years after the repeal of the Corn Laws an event took place which fittingly crowned his labours. In Decem- fcier, 1852, the Tory party, after depriving Peel of office, after opposing for six long years his policy as ruinous to CoBDEN^s Work and Writings 5 the nation, and after appealing to the country to reverse that policy, hauled down their colours, and the Tory Ministers of the Crown, and the bulk of their party, followed the Liberals into the lobby in order to aflirm a resolution that the policy of Cobden, which they had condemned, was sound and successful, and ought to be maintained. On that occasion a follower of Peel, pointing to the Treasury Bench, exclaimed, " If you w^ant humiliation, look there." Cobden cared httle for humiliation. It was enough for him that, an insig- nificant minority of some fifty excepted, both parties in the House of Commons combined to affirm the great principle of which he was the champion. It has been said that Cobden and Bright were de- magogues. They were certainly leaders of the people ; but a demagogue is generally supposed to secure and maintain his power with the people by flattering and cajoling them. A simple test will show whether Cob- den and Bright were demagogues in this sense. In 1854 the Russian war broke out. The nation has always a warlike tendency, and when its leaders tell it that war is necessary, it accepts their judgment but too readily, throwing itself into the struggle with vigorous and earnest resolution. In that mood neither the upper classes nor the working class-es are tolerant of opposi- tion, and statesmen, however honest and capable, if they question the passion of the hour, are heard with impatience, their warnings and remonstrances are brushed aside, and, when opportunities offer, the con- stituencies are not slow to punish them ; for the masses are unable to appreciate motives which appear to them unpatriotic. The result is intelligible, though not always creditable to the common sense of the nation. No demagogue, anxious to secure popularity and power, would oppose in such circumstances the dominant mood. Cobden and Bright thought that the Government and I the people were in error, and that the war was unneces- 1 sary. Careless of popularity when conscience was con- / cerned, they boldly expressed their views in and out of I Parliament, and as a consequence they lost their popu- I larity, and when, a year or two later, they denounced ( the war with China arising out of the miserable affair of ( the lorcha Arrow, they lost their seats. Who will say J 6 Cobden's Work and Writings now that it was not good for the nation that the warning voice should have been raised, and that honour is not due to the men who dared to raise it? Who will say in the light of experience that they were wrong in either case? There are few of us who lived in those days, and shared the prevaihng opinion, but have more than a doubt whether in the Crimean war our money was not wasted, and, what is worse, gallant lives lost in a bad cause. We know at least one great Tory leader, lately, alas ! taken from us, held that we put our money on the wrong horse. But be that as it may, happy is the country which has such demagogues as Cobden and Bright. Demagogues in the ordinary sense they were not. The title would fit better those who in war time use their passing popu- larity to inflame the national passion, and to crush opponents who do not share their views. The cloud of distress which so long hung over the nation had begun to lift some years before Cobden died. He lived indeed to see the commencement of that national prosperity which marked the last third of the nineteenth century. When he commenced his cam- paign against Protection the value of British produce exported was rather more than ;^5o,ooo,ooo. In 1864 it had risen to ;^i6o,ooo,ooo. In the year 1902 it had risen to ;^283,ooo,ooo. In 1841 one in every eleven persons of the population was in receipt of poor reUef ; in 1864 one in twenty ; in 1902 only one in forty. In 1841 the deposits in Savings Banks were ;^24,50o,ooo. In 1864 they had risen to 3^44,500,000 ; in 1900 to more than ;^207,ooo,ooo, besides ;£59,ooo,ooo invested in Building and Provident Societies. In 1843 the total annual value of the property and profits assessed to income tax were, including an estimate for Ireland, ;£"27o,ooo,ooo. In 1864 it had risen to ^^370,000,000, and in 1900 to ;,r758,ooo,ooo. Thus, in the quarter of a century from the formation of the Anti-Corn Law League, Cobden saw the result of that great movement in an increase of 200 per cent, in the export of our goods, in the diminution of pauperism by nearly a half, in the savings of the poor nearly doubled, and in the increase by 37 per cent, of the income of the well-to-do classes. Truly he might feel that, thanks in the main to the labours of himself and Co BD en's Work and Writings 7 Bright, to the poHcy of which he had been the champion, the country had entered on a period of progress and prosperity. What would he have thought if his hfe could have been spared to the beginning of the twentieth century, and seen continued progress in our export trade, pauperism again decreased by a half, the savings of the poor increased by nearly 400 per cent., and the incomes of the well-to-do more than doubled ? Two facts characterise the national mood in the latter part of the nineteenth century which would have grieved Cobden to the heart — the growth of military and naval expenditure and the de- velopment of warlike spirit in the ^ ^J^^^"^^ °^ 1 TT iu t 4. • o- Jingoism, people. He thought m 1050 an ex- penditure on army and navy of ;^i6,ooo,ooo excessive, and in 1864 he thought an expenditure on those services of ;^26,ooo,ooo still more excessive. On this point he and Bright were not singular. Many men not of the Man- chester school shared their views, and in 1862 the Liberal party in Parliament insisted on reduction of expenditure, supporting Gladstone in the Cabinet against Palmerston, and Palmerston had to yield. But if Cobden thought the expenditure of 1850 and 1864 excessive, what would he have thought of a mili- tary and naval expenditure of between ;^7o,ooo,ooo and ;^8o,ooo,ooo in 1903 — a year of peace ? And how would it have added to his sorrow to learn that this enormous expenditure is tolerated, one might say approved, by a democracy ! When Cobden died the country was ruled by the middle classes, the householder of ;,f 10 and upwards. He was earnestly in favour of a wide extension of the suffrage. Within a few years of his death household suffrage was established, and the franchise was extended to the agricultural labourers. Thus a middle-class Government was converted into a democracy. The middle-class constituencies had been economical to a certain extent, though not nearly so economical as Cobden would have wished. The democracy has been, and is, lavishly extravagant. A great Tory statesman, deploring the increase of public expenditure, could only say plaintively, ''Who are we that we should stem the tide ? " — an expression of despair, perhaps, hardly worthy of the leader of a 8 Cobden's Work and Writings great party, but indicative of the reality, I might say the popularity of the evil, and of the difficulty of coping with it. Cobden acted consistently on principle, and we may rest assured that he would have granted the extension of the suffrage, even if he could have fore- seen that the democracy would use it to their own disadvantage. He would have held that the people had a right to govern themselves, whether they used their power well or ill, but it would have sorely dis- appointed him to see the democracy, the working classes, whose true interest lies in public economy and low taxation, as eager as ever were the upper classes, and much more eager than the middle classes, for military glory, expansion of territory, and lavish expenditure. The great work of Free Trade which Cobden accomplished is now w^antonly assailed, and it is well that at the present crisis men should now reconsider his conception of the true interests of the nation of which he was so eminently a type. " I would rather live in a country where the feeling in favour of indi- vidual liberty is jealously cherished, than be without it in the enjoyment of all the principles of the French constituted assembly." Thus spoke the true English- man. His speeches and writings are ransacked to find prophecies and anticipations which have not been fulfilled, in the hope of shaking faith in the soundness of the practical policy which he did so much to establish. Let him speak for himself. I care not whether his generous belief in the virtue of mankind, in their capacity for learning the lesson of enlightened self-interest and national morality led him into hopes which have not been justified by facts. Have the pre- dictions of other great statesmen always been fulfilled ? Shortly before the Peace of Amiens Pitt thought that he could find the means for another year of war, and that England would then be exhausted, yet England found the means for carrying on the war until 1815, though unhappily she suffered under this strain on her resources for many a long year. Was Canning correct in his bombastic prophecy that he had called into existence a new world to correct the balance of the old ? Has Palmerston's belief in the future of Turkey, CoBDEN^s Work and Writings 9 which led him into the Crimean War, been justified ? Or, to take a more modern instance, what shall we say of the foresight of our modern statesmen, who shut their eyes to the warnings of their expert advisers, and went totally unprepared into a great war, confident that it would last a few months and cost ;^io,ooo,ooo ? It lasted nearly three years, and cost ;f 250,000,000. These were grave miscalculations of the future. In three of them they were especially grave, because they con- cerned immediate poHcy, but Cobden's hopes as to the spread of Free Trade in foreign countries, and the growth of desire for peace, did not affect his practical pohcy. He advocated Free Trade, as essential to the welfare and progress of the nation, irrespective of foreign tariffs or the warhke tendencies of nations. The higher foreigners built their tariff wall with a view to exclude our goods, the more resolute would he have been to demolish the wall which a long period of Protectionist government had been erecting on this side the Channel. He wanted to give our working classes cheap food, and our manufacturers untaxed raw materials, and the incitement to skill and industry which competition affords, in order that we might continue to hold our pre-eminence in trade. But the new Protectionists argue that circumstances have changed since 1846, and that the policy of 1846 is no longer suited to the needs of the nation. Mr. Balfour, in his recent manifesto, lays it down that we ought "to accept provisionally the view that the character of our fiscal policy should vary with varying circumstances," and he proposes to give effect to his axiom by a total revolution in our fiscal policy, which certainly cannot be described as provisional. In face, however, of so radical a change, it is not sufficient to say merely that circumstances have changed. The burthen of proof Hes with the Government. The Prime Minister must show by facts that circumstances have changed to the detriment of the nation and to an extent which justifies the revolution. Is the prosperity of the nation declining ? Let us take Mr. Balfour's evidence. " Judged by all available tests, both the total W'ealth and the diffused well-being of the country are greater than they ever have been. We are not only 10 Co Eden's Work and Writings rich and prosperous in appearance, but also, I believe, in reality. I can find no evidence that we are living on our capital." So far, therefore, and on the evidence of the chief opponent of Free Trade, circumstances have not changed to the detriment of the nation. Under Free Trade the country, since 1846, has steadily advanced in prosperity. What, then, is the Prime Minister's reason for the revolution ? According to him a " close " examination of our export returns show signs of diminution, and he appends figures in support of his view, but his test is faulty. His argument apphes to the volume of our exports, and his figures to their declared value. But the value is based on the prices of the years, which vary from year to year, and are therefore a faulty basis of comparison. Hence upon a superficial examination he formed a vague apprehension, and he offers this as a sufficient reason for a return to a system of retaliation so long tried, and so decidedly condemned by that most cautious and prudent of statesmen. Sir Robert Peel. If Cobden's policy is brought to trial upon this indictment only, his followers need not fear the verdict. But Cobden's forecasts were not confined to the the spread of Free Trade, or the growth of desire for peace. Let us note in his writings how sound were his views, how just his prescience, on most of the important questions of the day. In '^ England, Ireland, and America," pubhshed in 1835, and in " Russia," pubUshed in 1836, he pleaded for non-intervention, not only as in accordance with moral law, but as a poHcy essential to the true interests of the country. He saw that the great change which had been silently taking place in the development of manufactures and in the growth of our town population made it necessary to review the principles of our domestic policy in order to adapt the Government to the changing condition of the people, and to alter, " the maxim by which its foreign relations have in past times been regulated." He said that the policy of making food dear in order to protect the interest of one class of producers was not only unjust, but impossible. The larger part of the working classes, ill-fed, and ill-paid, would not suffer for long their food to be made artificially dear by class CoBDEN*s Work and Writings ii legislation, that discontent and class war must be the result. He saw also — saw justly and saw first — " that it is from the silent and peaceful rivalry of American commerce, the growth of its manufactures, its rapid progress in internal improvement, the superior education of the people °'^ ^°^'eSl^' ^"^ and their economical and pacific Government — that it is from these, and not from the barbarous or the impoverishing armaments of Russia that the grandeur of our commercial and national prosperity is endangered." He added, indeed, that in less than twenty years this would be the sentiment of the people of England generally. His prophecy was somewhat too sanguine, but sixty years at all events have taught us the justice of his views as to the United States. He showed us also how to face our great antagonist, viz., by removing all obstacles to trade. The United States have a thriving and intelhgent popu- lation of 80,000,000, nearly double that of the United Kingdom. They are lightly taxed, very little indebted, and incur insignificant charge for military and naval service. Yearly a large proportion of the people goes into the towns and engages in manufacturing industries, and it is at this moment, when their competition with us becomes daily more intense, that it is gravely pro- posed that we should fetter and impede our manufac- turing and consuming powers by preferential and retahatory duties, that we should tie up a man's leg in order to help him in running a race. Take, again, Cobden's views as to Ireland. How, after a powerful picture of Ireland's condition, he traces the evils which produced such results to the ignorance of England on Irish questions. How he condemns the statesmen " who have averted their faces from this diseased member of the body politic." Listen to the following words written in 1851 : "Hitherto in Ireland the sole reliance has been on bayonets and patching. The feudal system presses upon that country in a way which, as a rule, only foreigners can understand, for we have an ingrained feudal spirit in our English character. I never spoke to a French or Italian econo- mist who did not at once put his finger on the fact that great masses of landed property were held by the 12 CoBDEifs Work and Writings descendants of a conquering race, who were living abroad, and thus in a double manner perpetuating the remembrance of conquest and oppression, while the natives were at the same time precluded from possessing themselves of landed property, and thus becoming interested in the peace of the country. ... How are we to get out of this dilemma with the present House of Commons, and our representative system as it is, is the problem.'^ The problem was not to be solved by that House of Commons or the Hmited representative system that then existed. The Home Rule Bill of Mr. Gladstone may be open to criticism, but impartial history will recognise that he, with all the earnestness of his nature, forced the English nation much against its will to face the Irish questions — the question of the Irish Church, Irish self-government, and Irish land tenure. A Conservative Government has lately com- pleted, with large aid from the British Exchequer, the revolution in the tenure of Irish land begun in 1 88 1, and Mr. Wyndham's measure, which aims at ending this '' feudal system " of land tenure, confirms and justifies the foresight of Cobden and the pohcy of Gladstone. " In Russia," published in 1836, and in " What Next and Next ? '^ published during the Crimean War, Cobden reproved the spirit of Russo- phobia then rampant, and rampant long afterwards ; but there are signs that thinking minds are beginning to share the views of Cobden on that fear of Russia which has so long haunted the nation, which plunged us into the Crimea War, the Afghanistan War, and which more recently led the Government to take a course in China which has not enhanced our reputation. In his letter to Mr. Ashworth (April 10, 1862) Cobden urged that all private property should in time of war be exempt from capture at sea, that neutral ships ought to be exempt from search or visitation, and that the com- mercial ports of an enemy ought to be exempt from blockade. Cobden advocated these changes in inter- national law, after his wont, because they would be of special advantage to this country. Many people are at present exercised as to the ensuring a supply of food for this country in time of war. They are discussing clumsy and expensive remedies against this contingency. CoBDENS Work and Writings 13 They would do well to consider Cobden's able argu- ment in support of his proposal. This country could not under any circumstances provide the food required for its immense population, and it must be dependent on foreign countries for the raw material of its manu- factures. No country, therefore, is more interested in modifications of international law which would ensure the supply of these necessaries. It is possible that those modifications might not be respected by belligerent nations under the stress of war, but their acceptance by the Powers would impose an obligation on belligerents, which could not be repudiated without risk and without dishonour. The '' Three Panics" is a powerfully- written pamphlet, both in style and matter. It is an excellent example of the manner in which Cobden seizes the weak points of a policy to which he is opposed, of the clearness and conciseness with which he exposes them, and of the skill and power with which he drives home his conclusions. In these writings Cobden may have overrated antici- pated advantages and underrated difficulties. He may have been too sanguine in some directions, he may have relied too much on the wisdom of this and other nations, and not have been sufficiently alive to the ambition of statesmen and to international jealousies ; but no fair person can fail to be struck by the general soundness of his argument, the morality of his statesmanship, and the correctness in the main of his foresight, as evidenced by the manner in which national opinion has veered in his direction. His opinion on national expenditure will be chiefly criticised. Probably he, like other persons, taught by the experience of the last forty years, would admit the necessity of a navy, sufficiently powerful, according to our present knowledge, for our defence. It must, indeed, be remembered that he accepted the principle of that policy, though he did not accept even the standard of efficiency accepted by the statesmen of that day. On the whole, however, how just was his opinion of the national interest in public economy ! True Free Traders must endorse his principles as strongly now as then, nay, more strongly, for the evil of extravagance becomes daily more evident. If a nation is to be strong and contented, the mass of the 14 Co Eden's Work and Writings population must be sufficiently fed. The extravagance of peace expenditure in the last few years has necessi- tated a reversal of the wise policy which ruled from 1842 for forty years. The tea duty has been raised until it is nearly 100 per cent, on the value of the article. A duty has been placed upon sugar equivalent to 50 per cent, upon its value, apart from our quixotic anxiety to lose a bounty worth to us probably another 50 per cent. The supposed necessity for lavish expen- diture has made it necessary to seek new sources of revenue, and high financial authority has pleaded that the basis of taxation must be widened. That is to say, duties must be imposed on articles of consumption, and the poorest classes must be taxed in order to meet the ever-increasing demand for military expenditure — a singular device for improving the physical strength and consequently the power of the nation. Mr. Chamber- lain goes a step further, and would "widen the basis of taxation " in furtherance of a new line of policy. He wishes to tax the bread of the poor as a tribute to our prosperous fellow-subjects in the self-governing Colonies, and in the hope that this contribution from the working- classes at home may induce the Colonies to enter into closer confederation with us. Thus, economy in public expenditure, on which Cobden insisted with such earnestness, is absolutely abandoned. Mihtary experts, policy-mongers, interested trades have only to ask in order to receive. The tub of the Danaids is a water- tight vessel compared with the exchequer. The burthen of this extravagance weighs upon all classes, but most upon the poor. The Free Trader, on his side, sees that extravagance in public expenditure, by making new taxation neces- sary, has given the Protectionists an opportunity of which they are not slow to avail themselves, and it is only too hkely that, if the nation does not speak out. Protection in aggravated form will be a plank in the Conservative platform. Thus the lesson which Cobden taught is brought home, and the wisdom of his teaching is made only too clear. Students of English may learn much from Cobden's writings. They are like his speech — clear, fearless, vigorous, but persuasive. The style was the man, th^ Co Eden's Work and Writings 15 result of conviction based upon close observation and careful thought. The purity of his style is the more remarkable, since he had no advantage from education in the formation of it ; but his keen sense of beauty, his innate power of understanding excellence in art, bestowed upon him a power of appreciation such as men usually acquire by long study. How genuine, in his Italian diary, is his admiration of the great works of antiquity, and how well he expresses his admiration of them ! The two great twin brethren of Free Trade were singularly fitted for co-operation in the conduct of a crusade against vested interests and deep-rooted pre- judices. Both were outspoken, both put clearly and pointedly their argument to the public, and neither of them was a respecter of persons. Bright, however, was bold and somewhat aggressive, while Cobden was bold and persuasive. Cobden, therefore, aroused less per- sonal antagonism ; but the EngHsh mind is conservative, and people in comfortable circumstances regard with distrust the man who attacks established interests and the existing order of things. Hence Cobden, though perhaps in a less degree than Bright, was for years misunderstood. May Cobden's writings in this hour of crisis for Free Trade find readers in every part of the kingdom ! His pamphlets have lost nothing of their intrinsic value, though they were written seventy, fifty, forty years ago, and though the circumstances of the nation, and the temper of the nation, have changed greatly in the interval. The principles they inculcate, the lessons they teach, are as good and as sound now as they were then. Thoughtful readers will realise how Cobden's policy has removed causes of discontent, has promoted good understanding throughout the community, and tended to weld rich and poor into one nation. They will realise how just, and therefore how conservative, were his views, and how sound in the main was his judgment, even tried during half a century by the hard test of experience. We who are Free Traders have absolute confidence in our principle, and our belief in the great leader of the Free Trade movement is unabated. II THE POLITICAL OPINIONS OF RICHARD COBDEN By Sir Louis Mallet, C3.^ It is with a peculiar satisfaction that we hail the publi- cation of " The Political Writings of Richard Cobden." Presented originally to the public in the ephemeral form of pamphlets, thrown out in sharp opposition to the prevailing passions and prejudices of the hour, and systematically depreciated as they were by the organs of public opinion which guide the majority of our upper classes, we suspect that they are well-nigh for- gotten by the elder, and little known to the younger men among us. Yet do these scattered records of Mr. Cobden's thoughts contain a body of pohtical doctrine more original, more profound, and more con- sistent, than is to be found in the spoken or written * Being portions of an essay written first in 1867, and reissued in 1869, as an Introduction to "The Political Writings of Richard Cobden." The late Sir Louis Mallet was Mr. Cobden's assistant in the negotiations of the Treaty of Commerce with France in i860, and was at the Board of Trade in succeeding years, charged with the negotiations of similar treaties with other European powers, which did so much for the extension of free trade ideas and brought about a general reduction of tariffs which has not even yet lost its effect. He was brought much into contact with Mr. Cobden in official and private life. Until the publication of Cobden's Life by Mr. John Morley, who had the advantage of Sir L. Mallet's assistance and advice, this essay was tlie only authoritative comment upon the great free trade statesman's work. 16 The Political Opinions of Richard CobdMn 17 utterances of any other English statesman of our time, and we commend them to the earnest study and con- sideration of all who aspire to exert an influence on the future government of our country. Whatever may be thought of his political character, it will be admitted that no man has made a deeper impression on the policy of this country during his time than Richard Cobden. The false judgment so commonly passed upon this statesman is to be traced, we believe, in a great measure to that which constitutes his great and his distinguished merit, viz., his steady adherence to general principles, and his consequent freedom from class and party views, and his indifference to the popular clamour of the hour, which in turn brought him into colHsion with all classes and with all parties, and on some memorable occasions, with the body of the people themselves. Mr. Cobden's political character was the result of a rare and fortunate combination of personal qualities and of external circumstances. Sprung from the agricultural class, and bred up (to use his own expression) '' amidst the pastoral charms of Southern England," imbued with so strong an attachment to the pursuits of his forefathers, that, as he says himself, in the volumes before us, ** had we the casting of the role of all the actors on this world's stage, we do not think that we should suffer a cotton-mill or manufactory to have a place in it ; " trained in a large conamercial house in London, and subsequently con- ducting on his own account a print manufactory in Lancashire, Mr. Cobden possessed the peculiar advan- tage of a thorough acquaintance and sympathy with the three great forms of industrial life in England. Nor were the experiences of his public career less rich and varied than those of his private life. The first great political question in which he bore a conspicuous part, the Anti-Corn-Law agitation, and his consequent connection with the powerful producing class, which, by the fortunate coincidence of interest with that of the people at large, originated and led this great and successful struggle, gave him a thorough insight into this important element of our body-politic, in all its strength and in all its weakness ; his know- 2 iS The Political Opinions of Richard Cob den ledge of other countries — the result of keen personal observation, and much travel both in Europe and America, his intimate relations with some of their best and most enlightened men, as well as with their leading politicians, and the moderating and restraining influences of twenty years of P.'yliamentary life, during which he conciliated the respect and esteem even of his strongest opponents, combined with the entire absence in his case of all sectarian influences and prejudices — gave to his opinions a comprehensive and catholic character, which is perhaps the rarest of all the attributes of English statesmanship. Mr. Cobden entered Parliament, not, as is the fate of most of our public men, to support a ^nar)oSt P'^^'^Yi ^^ P^'^y ^°^* office, or to educate himself for professional statesman- ship, still less to gratify personal vanity or to acquire social importance, but as the representative of distinct principles, and of a great cause. Mr. Cobden belonged to the school of political thinkers who believe in the perfect harmony of moral and economical laws, and that in proportion as these are recognised, understood, and obeyed by nations, will be their advance in all that constitutes civilisation. He believed that the interests of the individual, the interests of the nation, and the interests of all nations y are identical ; and that these several interests are all in entire and necessary concordance with the highest interests of morality. With this belief, an economic truth acquired with him the dignity and vitality of a moral law, and, instead of remaining a barren doctrine of the intellect, became a living force, to move the hearts and consciences of men. It is to a want of a clear conception of this great harmony between the moral and economic law, or to a disbelief in its existence, that are to be traced some of the most pernicious errors of modern times, and the lamentable condition of Europe at the present moment. " II n'y a que deux moyens," says Bastiat, " de se procurer les choses necessaires a Fembellissement, et au perfectionnement de la vie — la production et la spoliation." And again, " Propriete et spoliation, soeurs nees du meme pere, Genie du Bien, et Genie du The Political Ormioi^s of Richard Cob den 19 Mai, Salut et Fleaii de la Societe, Puissances qui se disputent depuis le commencement I'empire et les destinees du monde." These truths are of comparatively recent acceptance even in theory among us, and in practice still are far indeed from being applied. Such, moreover, is the confusion of thought, engendered by historical associa- tion, political prejudice, and class interest, that many of the forms of spoliation are hardly recognised when disguised in the garb of a British institution, a party prin- ciple, or a vested right ; in which artificial costume they still impose on the credulity of many of our countrymen. It is true that war is generally admitted to be an evil, and slavery to be a wrong ; that the Reformation has dealt a heavy blow at theocracy, and Free Trade at monopoly. But the spirit of war is still fostered and stimulated, by false ideas of national honour, patriotism, and policy, and to the art of war we still devote our mightiest efforts, and consecrate our costliest sacrifices. The grosser forms of slavery have indeed disappeared, but its taint is still to be traced in some of our institutions, and in our feeling towards subject races ; while our Reformed Church, with its temporalities, and its exclusive preten- sions and privileges, is still too often the enemy of the foundation of all freedom, liberty of thought. The last, and perhaps the most insidious, of the leading forms of '' spoliation," commercial monopoly, though driven from its strongholds, and expelled from our national creed, is still regarded by many among us with secret favour, and by most of us rather as a political error than as a moral wrong. It was to a struggle with this last great evil that Cobden devoted his life, and it is with the most decisive victory ever achieved in this field of conflict that his name and fame will be always identified ; but it is significant and interesting to know that, in selecting his work in life, it was to " Education," and not to " Free Trade," that his thoughts were first directed. Two reasons decided him to prefer the latter as the object of his efforts: — Firstly, his conviction that the material prosperity of nations is the only foundation of all progress, and that if this were 20 The Political Opinions of Richard Cob den once secured the rest would follow. Secondly, his consciousness that no direct attempt to obtain a system of national education which deserved the name, could lead to any clear result in the life of his own generation, and that, measured with those at his command, imposing as were the forces of resistance arrayed against him on the question of Free Trade, they were less formidable than those which would be brought to bear against a measure which united in a common hostility the Estab- lished and the Dissenting Churches. It was Cobden's fate or fortune to find himself, in taking up the cause of Free Trade, in the presence of one of the worst laws which the selfishness or folly of Governments has ever imposed on the weakness or ignorance of a people. When the soil of a country is appropriated, the only means whereby an increasing population can limit the encroachments of the proprietors, is by working for foreign markets. Such a population has only its labour to give in exchange for its requirements, and, if this labour is constantly increasing, while the produce of the soil is stationary, more of the first will steadily and progressively be demanded, for less of the last. This will be manifested by a fall of wages, which is, as has been well observed, the greatest of misfortunes when it is due to natural causes — the greatest of crimes when it is caused by the law. The Corn Law was the fitting sequel to the French war. The ruling classes in England had seized on the reaction of feeling created by the excesses of the French Revolution, to conceal the meaning of that event, and to discredit the principles of popular sovereignty which it asserted. They had before them a people impo- verished and degraded by the waste of blood and treasure in which years of war had involved their country ; and seeing the prospect before them, which the peace had opened, of a fall in the prices of agri- cultural produce, under the beneficent operation of the great laws of exchange, they resorted to the device of prolonging by Act of Parliament the artificial scarcity created by the war, and of thus preserving to the landed interest the profits which had been gained at the expense of the nation. The Political Opinions of Richard Cob den 21 It is thus that, as the forces of progress are invariably found to act and react on each other, the forces of resistance and of evil will ever be side by side, and that as protection, which means the isolation of nations, tends both by its direct and indirect effects to war, so war again engenders and perpetuates the spirit of pro- tection. Free Trade, or as Cobden called it, the Inter-V national Law of the Almighty, which means the) interdependence of nations, must bring with it theS surest guarantee of peace, and peace inevitably leads I to freer and freer commercial intercourse ; and there- ) fore, while there is no sadder page in the modern history of England than that which records the adoption of the Corn Law by the British Parliament, there is, to our minds, none more bright with the promise of future good than that on which was written, after thirty years of unjust and unnecessary suffering, its unconditional repeal. But as the intellect and conscience of the country had failed so long to recognise the widespread evils of this pernicious law, and the fatal principles which lay at its roots, so did they now most dimly and imper- fectly apprehend the scope and consequences of its abolition. It was called the repeal of a law ; admitted to be the removal of an intolerable wrong ; but we doubt whether in this country, except by a few gifted and far-seeing leaders of this great campaign, it was foreseen that it was an act which involved, in its certain results, a reversal of the whole policy of England. This was, however, clear enough to enlightened observers in other countries. By one of those rare coincidences which sometimes exercise so powerful an influence on human affairs, it happened, that while Cobden in England was bringing to bear on the great / practical questions of his time and country the principles / of high morality and sound economy which had been hitherto too little considered in connection with each other, Frederic Bastiat was conceiving and maturing in France the system of political philosophy which has since been given to the world, and which still remains the best and most complete exposition of the views of which Cobden was the great representative, 2 2 The Political Opinions of Richard Cobden It appears to us that these two men were necessary to each other. Without Cobden, Bastiat would have lost the powerful stimulant of practical example, and the wide range of facts which the movement in England supplied, and from which he drew much of his inspira- tion. Without Bastiat, Cobden's policy would not have been elaborated into a system, and, beyond his own immediate coadjutors and disciples, would probably have been most imperfectly understood on the Con- tinent of Europe. More than this, who can say what may not have been the effect on the minds of both these men, of the inter- change of thoughts and opinions which freely passed between them ? In his brilliant history of the Anti-Corn- Law League, '' Cobden et la Ligue," Bastiat thus describes the move- ment of which England was the theatre during that memorable struggle : — " I have endeavoured to state with all exactness the question which is being agitated in England. I have described the field of battle, the A Revolutionary areatness of the interests which are Principle there being discussed, the opposnig forces, and the consequences of victory. I have shown, I believe, that though the heat of contest may seem to be concentrated on questions of taxation, of custom- houses, of cereals, of sugar, it is, in point of fact, a ques- tion between monopoly and liberty, aristocracy and democracy — a question of equality or inequality in the distribution of the general well-being. The question at issue is to know whether legislative power and political influence shall remain in the hands of the men of rapine, or in those of the men of toil ; that is, whether they shall continue to embroil the world in troubles and deeds of violence, or sow the seeds of concord, of union, of justice, and of peace. "Wliat would be the thought of the historian who could believe that armed Europe, at the beginning of this century, performed, under the leadership of the most able generals, so many feats of strategy for the sole purpose of determining who should possess the narrow fields that were the scenes of the battles of Austerlitz or of Wagram ? The fate of dynasties and The Political Opinions of Richard Cobden 23 empires depended on those struggles. But the triumphs of force may be ephemeral ; it is not so with the triumphs of opinion. And when we see the whole of a great people, whose influence on the world is undoubted, impregnate itself with the doctrines of justice and truth ; when we see it repel the false ideas of supremacy which have so long rendered it dangerous to nations ; when we see it ready to seize the pohtical ascendant from the hands of a greedy and turbulent oligarchy — let us beware of believing, even when its first efforts seem to bear upon economic questions, that greater and nobler interests are not engaged in the struggle. For if, in the midst of many lessons of iniquity, many instances of national perversity, England, this imperceptible point of our globe, has seen so many great and useful ideas take root upon her soil — if she was the cradle of the press, of trial by jury, of a representative system, of the abolition of slavery, in spite of the opposition of a powerful and pitiless oligarchy — what may not the world expect from this same England when all her moral, social, and political power shall have passed, by a slow and difficult revolution, into the hands of democracy — a revolution peacefully accomplished in the minds of men under the leadership of an association which embraces in its bosom so many men whose high intellectual power and unblemished character shed so much glory on their country, and on the century in which they live ? Such a revolution is no simple event, no accident, no catastrophe due to an irresistible but evanescent enthusiasm. It is, if I may use the expres- sion, a slow social cataclysm, changing all the condi- tions of life and of society, the sphere in which it fives and breathes. It is justice possessing herself of power ; good sense of authority. It is the general weal, the weal of the people, of the masses, of the smafi and of the great, of the strong and of the weak, becoming the law of political action. It is the disappearance behind the scene of privilege, abuse, and caste-feeling, not by a palace-revolution or a street-rising, but by the progres- sive and general appreciation of the rights and duties of man. In a word, it is the triumph of human liberty ; it is the death of monopoly, that Proteus of a thousand forms, now conqueror, now slave-owner \ at one time 24 The Political Opinions of Richard Cobden lover of theocracy and feudalism, at another time assuming an industrial, a commercial, a financial, and even a philanthropic shape. Whatever disguise it might borrow, it could no longer bear the eye of public opinion, which has learned to detect it under the scarlet uniform or under the black gown, under the planter's jacket and the noble peer's embroidered robe. Liberty for all ! for every man a just and natural remuneration for his labour ! for every man a just and natural avenue to equahty in proportion to his energy, his intelligence, his prudence, and his morality ! Free Trade with all the world ! Peace with all the world ! No more sub- jugation of new colonies, no more army, no more navy than is necessary for the maintenance of national in- dependence ! A radical distinction between that which is and that which is not the mission of government and law ; political association reduced to guarantee each man his liberty and safety against all unjust aggressions, whether from without or from within ; equal taxation, for the purpose of properly paying the men charged with this mission, and not to serve as a mask under the name of outlets for trade, for outward usurpation, and, under the name of protection^ for the mutual robbery of classes. Such is the real issue in England, though the field of battle may be confined to a custom-house ques- tion. But this question involves slavery in its modern form ; for as Mr. Gibson, a member of the League, has said in ParHament, ' To get possession of men that we may make them work for our own profit, or to take possession of the fruits of their labour, is equally and always slavery ; there is no difference but in the degree.' " The system of which the Corn Laws were the corner- stone, traced to its source, rested on the principle of spohation, and on the foundation of force. That which J was inaugurated by the overthrow of that law, rested on the principle of freedom, and on the foundation of justice. Monopoly of trade, involving, as it must, the violation of rights of property and of labour, both in the internal and external relations of a State, and implying, when carried to its logical consequences, national isolation, contains within itself the germs of inevitable stagnation The Political Opinions of Richard Cobden 25 and decay. To avoid these results, it is necessary that a Government which maintains it should resort to all the expedients of force and fraud — to conquest, colonial aggrandisement, maritime supremacy, foreign alliances, reciprocity treaties, and communism in the shape of poor-laws — and should perpetually appeal to the worst and most contemptible passions of its people, its national pride, to false patriotism, to jealousy, to fear, and to selfishness, in order to keep alive its prestige and to conceal its rottenness. We are far from imputing the marvellous skill which the ruling classes in England displayed in the use of these expedients to a conscious and deliberate policy. We know that good and able men, and an honest though misguided patriotism, have been too often the blind instruments of the retributive justice w^iich always avenges the violation of moral principles ; but there was a point beyond which even these expedients would not sufiice to arrest the national decay, and with a debt of _^8oo, 000,000, an impoverished starving people, the universal distrust, and the avowed or concealed hostility of foreign nations, who had imitated our policy too closely, while growing communities of our own blood, with boundless material resources and free institutions, were outstripping us in the race of progress, and making the future competition of force impossible, a state of things had been engendered which called for prompt and vigorous remedy. To Cobden, and his colleagues of the League, belongs the merit of having traced the disease to its source, of having stayed the progress of the poison which was slowly, but surely, undermining our national greatness, and of changing the current of English policy. By the repeal of the Corn Laws, the false idea of isolated progress was for ever dispelled, our foreign trade became a condition of our existence, and the great law of international co-operation assumed its rightful place as the animating principle of our future course. But though the edifice of protection was shaken at the base, and the fabric irrevocably doomed to destruction, the work was only begun : the ideas which the system had created had taken too deep root in the rriinds of 26 The Political Opinions of Richard Cob den the governing classes, and the forces of reaction were still too powerful to allow of speedy or logical progress. The gradual breaking-up of the protective system after the repeal of the Corn Laws was a work which must in any case have proceeded, under the pressure of the irresistible force of circumstances ; but we think that justice has never been done to the Government of Lord John Russell, and his colleagues Lord Grey and Mr. Labouchere, in this respect. The equalisation of the Sugar Duties, the repeal of the Navigation Laws, the reform of our'' Colonial System," were all accomplished by this administration, and few indeed have been the Governments of England which can point to such substantial services as these in the cause of progress. This course of useful domestic reform was, however, rudely interrupted by one of those events which ought to teach us the hopelessness of all permanent progress by isolated action, and the absolute necessity of always considering our position as a member of the comity of nations. The Crimean War brought once more into life and activity all the elements of the national character the most opposed to the silent and beneficent forces of moral and material progress, fatally arrested the agencies of peace which the Anti-Corn- Law League had set in motion, and has gone far to deprive us of the fruits of the great reforms which those agencies had effected. The Royal Commission which, under Prince Albert's auspices, organised the first great Exhibition, had brought together at last, in a common and international work, the three men who seem to us to have been eminently designed to co-operate for the public good, and we cannot doubt that, if the lives of Prince and Minister had been spared a few years longer, and Peel had returned to office in 1852, he would have received the cordial support of Cobden, either in or out of office. But this was not to be ; in 1846, on the occasion of the repeal, to make Cobden Minister would have been an act of political justice and wisdom for which the times were not ripe, while to accept the subordinate office which was offered him, from men who had so recently, and so reluctantly, espoused his views on Free Trade, and who §0 imperfectly apprehended or accepted its The Political Opinions of Richard Cob den 27 ulterior consequences, would have fatally compromised his future usefulness. He knew that there were several necessary measures which the general intelligence of the Liberal party would immediately force upon the ^^^^ .international Parliament, and his work at this j^^^,, moment lay in another direction. He had been the chief instrument in giving the death-blow to a mighty monopoly, in redressing a grievous wrong, and in giving food to suffering millions at home. His services as an Englishman being thus far accomplished, he entered upon his mission as an "international man." He knew, and had measured accurately, the obstacles presented by the laws of other countries, often the too faithful reflection of our own, to the fulfilment of the grand aim of his life, the binding together of the nations of the earth by the material bonds which are the necessary and only preparation for their moral union. These laws had raised around us innumerable barriers to intercourse, and as many stumbling-blocks in the way of peace. In a tour through Europe, which often resembled a triumphal progress, he was every- where received with interest and attention ; but the sudden recantation of a policy bound up with all the traditions of England was open to too much suspi- cion to inspire confidence, and he was obliged to be content with sowing the seeds of much which has since borne fruit, and with inspiring new zeal and hope in the minds of the good and enlightened men who, in each centre which he visited, were labouring in the cause. No stronger proof can be afforded of the fundamental misconception of Cobden's political character which had prevailed in England than the judgments and criticisms which it was the custom to pass upon him with reference to the class of questions to which he addressed himself on his return to public Hfe at home. It seems to have been expected that he would have exclusively devoted himself to commercial questions, and when it was found that he proceeded to attack systematically our foreign policy, our system of government in India, our national expenditure, our military and naval administration, and pur maritime laws, he was accused of going beyond his 2 8 The Political Opinions of Richard Cobden province, and discredited as an enthusiast incapable of dealing with the great mysteries of statecraft. Those who used this language either knew too well, or not at all, that Cobden aimed at something very different and very much deeper than mere commercial reforms. In each and all of these he took, as was natural, a sincere and consistent interest, but he knew, unless aided and con- solidated by collateral measures, that incalculable as would be the results to the wealth and prosperity of the country, they would not suffice to raise the lower classes of this country from their condition of moral and material degradation, and thus to rescue England from the reproach of failure in the highest ends of civilisation, and to assure for her a permanent place in the front rank of nations. It was, therefore, that, instead of entangling himself in the snares of office, and devoting his time to the details of practical legislation, he undertook the harder and more ungrateful, but far nobler office, of endeavour- ing to open the eyes of his countrymen to the necessity under which they lay of preparing for fundamental changes in many of the essential principles upon which our national policy had previously been conducted, in its three great divisions — Foreign, Colonial, and Domestic. Cobden saw clearly that, unless our system of government, in all its branches, were adapted to the altered conditions of our national existence, not only would our commercial reforms be shorn of their most valuable and complete results in the elevation of the masses of the people, but that we should also incur the risk of very serious dangers. Nothing is so fatal to success in the life of individuals or of nations as a confusion of principles in action. Under the system of monopoly it was logical enough to keep alive the chimera of the balance of power, to seek, in foreign alliances and artificial combinations of force, the security which we could not hope to derive from legitimate and natural causes. In the government of our foreign possessions it was logical to annex pro- vinces and extend our empire, and by the display of force and the arts of diplomacy to coerce and despoil ; and for both these purposes, it was necessary to main- tain costly and imposing forces by sea and land, and to The Political Opinions of Richard Cob den 29 cast on the people the burden of a proportionate taxa- tion. By means such as these we might have prolonged, for two' or three generations, a false and hollow supre- macy, and warded off for a while the inevitable doom which awaits all false principles. But with a policy of free exchange these things are not only inconsistent, they are dangerous. They are inconsistent, because a policy of Free Trade rests on the principle that the interests of all nations lie in union, and not in oppo- sition ; that co-operation and not competition, international inter-dependence and not national inde- pendence are the highest end and object of civilisa- tion, and that, therefore, peace, and not war, is the natural and normal condition of civilised communities in their relation to each other. They are dangerous, because a country which is unable to feed its own population without its foreign trade, and of whose prosperity, and even existence, peace is thus a neces- sary condition, cannot afford, without tremendous risks, to encounter the hazards of war with powerful enemies. If such a country trusts to the law of force, by that law will it be judged, and the result must be crushing failure, disaster, and ultimate defeat. There were those who clearly foresaw and apprehended this, and depre- cated the repeal of the Corn Law accordingly, but who did not perceive that the alternative was an inadequate supply of food for a third of our population. From this point of view, the " balance of power " can only be sought in the free development of the natural forces, whether of morality, intelligence, or material wealth, residing in the different countries of the earth, and the balance will always be held (to use the expres- sion of Wilham III., in his address to Parliament, quoted by Mr. Cobden in his paper on " Russia "), so far as any one State can pretend to do so, by the country which, in proportion to its powers, has econo- mised its material resources to the highest point, and acquired the highest degree of moral ascendency by an honest and consistent allegiance to the laws of morality in its domestic policy and in its foreign relations. The acquisition of colonies and territories, formerly required to afford new fields for monopoly, and defended on the plea that outlets were necessary for our trade, while our 30 The Political Opinions of Richard Cobden ports were closed to our nearest and richest neighbours, appeared in its true hght as a waste of national influ- ence, and a costly and useless perversion of national wealth, when all the countries of the earth became our customers, and England the metropolitan entrepot oi the world. Large standing armies and navies, with their necessary accompaniments of heavy, and, because heavy, unequal and indirect taxation, are only rational in countries which are constantly liable to war, and cannot therefore be equally required under a system which relies on moral influence and on international justice, as under one which depends on force and monopoly. To summon into existence a principle, which in all human relations shall assert the right of property, in mind and in matter, in thought and in labour, and to secure this right on its only true foundation — the universal rule of justice and freedom — is to evoke a force which is destined to root up and destroy the seeds of discord and division among men ; to bind up the nations of the earth in a vast federation of interests, and to bring the disorders and conflicting passions of society under the domain of law. To promote all the agencies through which this force can act, and to repress all those which oppose its progress and neu- tralise its operation, and for this purpose to analyse and expose to view these several agencies, both in their causes and in their effects, eternally acting and reacting on each other, was the task which Cobden set himself to accomplish. It was inevitable, with these objects in view, that Cobden was often obliged to raise discussion upon questions which, to ordinary minds, appeared some- what chimerical, and to propose measures which were in the nature of things premature ; that he should give to many the impression of wasting his strength on matters which could not be brought to an immediate practical issue, and in the agitation of which he could not hope for direct success. It will be found, however, that although there often existed no possibility of realising or applying his projects at the time of their enunciation, these were always themselves of an essen- tially practical character, and inseparably connected The Political Opinions of RiciiAkD Cob den 31 with each other ; and that, although presented as occa- sion served, from time to time, and as the nature of his mission required, in a fragmentary and separate form, they each and all formed the component parts of a policy coherent and complete, and destined, we trust, to a gradual but ultimate fulfilment. The programme which Cobden appears to have set before him in the construction , of a policy embraced the following Programme, objects : — 1. Complete freedom of trade throughout the British Empire with all the world, exclusive for the present (as a practical necessity) of restrictions indispensably requisite for fiscal purposes. 2. The final and unquahfied abandonment of a policy of conquest and territorial aggrandisement in every quarter of the world. 3. The adoption of the general principles of non- inierveniion and arbitration in our foreign policy, pub- licity in all the transactions of diplomacy, and the renunciation of all ideas of national preponderance and supremacy. 4. The reduction of military and naval forces by international co- operation. 5. A large reduction of taxation. 6. A reform in the laws affecting land. 7. Freedom of the press from all taxes, happily stigmatised by Mr. Milner Gibson as taxes on know- ledge. 8. A reform of maritime law. We do not include in this programme the two great measures of National Education and Parliamentary Reform because, although essential to the progress and security of government, and as such of course en- listing Cobden's sympathy, they are, after all, the means and not the end of good government ; and we are disposed to think that he felt that his peculiar powers could be more usefully devoted to the assertion of the principles on which governments should be conducted than to the construction of the machinery out of which they should be elaborated. We will endeavour to give briefly an outline of what appear to have been Cobden's views on the leading divisions of national policy which 32 The Political Opinions of Richard Cob den the foregoing programme was designed to affect. We have said that the central idea of the national policy represented by Cobden was " Free Exchange " in the most comprehensive meaning of that term as the necessary complement of personal freedom, and the full assertion of the rights of property and labour. The reahsation of this idea logically involves all the consequences which Cobden aimed at promoting by direct or indirect efforts. Foreign Policy. — In the field of foreign policy these consequences were immediate and obvious. The prin- ciple of foreign policy under a system of monopoly is national independence — in other words, " isolation ; " under that of free exchange it is international inter- dependence. We have already observed upon the bearing of this latter principle on the doctrine of the balance of power, and pointed out the fundamental difference between a policy which proceeds on princi- ples of international morahty, and appeals to the common interests of all nations of the earth, and one which rests on ideas of national supremacy and rivalry. But in the practical application of the Free Trade foreign policy, there has been so much mis- understanding of Cobden's views, and, as we think, so much confusion of thought even among advanced Liberals that a few further remarks may be useful. This policy is ordinarily characterised by the name of non-inteivention. In some respects this designation has been an unfortunate one. It has given colour to the idea that what was desired was a blind and sellish indifference to the affairs of other countries, and a sort of moral isolation, as foreign to the principle of international interdependence as it is impossible in connection with increased material intercourse. Cobden never, as far as we are aware, advanced or held the opinion that wars other than those undertaken for self-defence were in all cases wrong or inexpedient. The question, as we apprehend it, was with him one of relative duties. It is clear that the duty and wisdom of entering upon a war, even in defence of the most righteous cause, must be measured by our knowledge and by our power ; but, even where our knowledge is complete and our power sufficient, it is necessary that, The Political Opinions of Richard Cod den 33 in undertaking such a war, we should be satisfied that, in doing so, we are not neglecting and putting it out of our reach, to fulfil more sacred and more imperative duties. The cases are rare in the quarrels of other nations, still rarer in their internal dissensions, in which our knowledge of their causes and conditions, and our power of enforcing the right, and assuring its success, in any degree justifies us in armed interference — the last resort in the failure of human justice. But even if these difficult conditions of our justifica- tion in such a war were satisfied, the cases must be rare- indeed in which, with a population of which so large a part is barely receiving the means of decent existence, and another part is supported by pubhc charity at the expense of the rest, and at a charge of nearly ;^io,ooo,ooo per annum, this country would be justified in imposing on our labouring classes (on whom, be it remembered, the burden must chiefly fall) the cost of obtaining for another people a degree of freedom or a measure of justice which they have so imperfectly secured for themselves. Such a course is certainly not defensible unless the people have a far larger share in the government of their country than they possessed during Cobden's life in England. When we add to these considerations the singular inaptitude of the governing classes of this country to comprehend foreign affairs, the extraordinary errors which are usually to be observed in their judgments and opinions on foreign questions, and the dangerous liabiUty to abuse in the hands of any government, of the doctrine of " Blood and Iron," even if it be some- times invoked in a just cause, we shall, we think (without asserting that it must be inflexibly enforced), acknowledge the sober wisdom of Cobden's opinions, that, for all practical purposes, at least for this genera- tion, the principle of non-intervention should be made, as far as general principles can be applied to such questions, the rule of our foreign poHcy. Let those who sneer at what they consider a sordid and ungenerous view, reflect on the history of the past, and ask themselves what is to be the hope of humanity if the motives which have hitherto regulated the policy of our country are in future to determine the intercourse 34 The Political Opinions of Richard Cobden of nations. Let them look back upon the great French war, not as it is interpreted by Cobden in his most instructive paper in the work before us, but read by the Hght of those teachers of history who see in it a proud record of England's glory and power in vindicating the liberties of mankind, and satisfy their conscience, it they can, of the righteousness of a cause which required the aid of Holy Alliances, the legions of despots, and a campaign which terminated in the Congress of Vienna, and which ended in the suffoca- tion of popular rights for half a century, the enactment of the English Corn Law and all that it represents, and a condition of Europe which even now almost precludes the hope of real civilisation. Colonial Policy. — There is no branch of the national economy in which the neglect of Cobden's principles has led to more glaring and lamentable results than in that between the mother country and its possessions. The inability even of the Government which was borne to power on the shoulders of the Anti-Corn-Law League to apprehend the scope and importance of Free Trade is in no direction more strikingly manifested than in the colonial policy. Would it not have been possible, when the right of self-government was conferred upon our colonial pos- sessions, to have stipulated, as a necessary condition, and as a great and fundamental rule of imperial policy, the complete absence of Protection throughout the dominions of the Crown ? Instead of this, the most confused idea prevailed, and still prevails, as to the limits of colonial self-government in adopting a commercial policy opposed to the principles and interests of the mother country. The colonies have been allowed to impose protective duties on British manufactures, and on those of foreign, countries. They are allowed to protect : would they be allowed to prohibit ? for it must be remembered that protection, so far as it restricts a trade, is nothing more nor less than prohibition to that extent ; and if not to prohibit, where is the line to be drawn, at duties of 20, or 30, or 50, or 100 per cent ? It is clear that the right of absolute self-government involves the corresponding duty of self-support and The Political Opinions of Richard Cobden 35 self-defence ; but the colonies are far from having undertaken the latter. If such sacrifices as these are imposed on the British taxpayer, has he not a right to be allowed to trade on equal terms with his colonial fellow-subjects ? Cobden never lost an opportunity of protesting against this last misappropriation of the money of the old country, and of exposing the secret connection of this feature in our policy with the perpetuation of pretexts for increased armaments. It is painful to think of the contrast between our present position and prospects as a nation, and that which it might have presented, had the foundations of our colonial empire been laid broad and deep in commercial freedom. Is it yet too late ? Is no effort yet possible towards such a consummation ? Eastern Policy. — The British rule in India was to Cobden a subject of the deepest anxiety and appre- hension. His paper entitled " How Wars are got up in India " is an honest and indignant criticism upon an episode in our Indian history which has only too many parallels, and gives expression to one of his strongest convictions, viz., the retribution which one day awaits the lust of power and of territorial aggrandisement, and the utter disregard of morality so often exhibited in our dealings with the races of this great dependency. But in our Eastern policy much progress has been made since Cobden's time, and we have seen, w^e trust, the dawn of a better day. Reduction of Militaty and Naval Expenditure. — The changes advocated by Cobden in our foreign and colonial policy necessarily involved « «• + a large reduction m our military Militarism, and naval establishments, and to this object his most strenuous efforts were constantly directed ; but here the difticulties w^hich he had to encounter were enormous, and the Crimean war and its results throughout Europe have rendered all attempts at reform in this branch of our national economy hitherto unavailing. In attacking our ''Services" he not only had to contend against powerful interests connected with almost all the families of the upper and middle classes of the country, but also against many honest, though 36 The Political Opinions op Richard Cobden mistaken, opinions as to the causes of national greatness and the sources of our power. It was the widespread prevalence of such opinions, combined with the selfish influence of the worst element in British commerce, which led, on the occasion of the Chinese war in 1857, to the rejection of Cobden by the West Riding, and of Bright and Gibson by Manchester. The class of ideas symbolised by the " British Lion," the *' Sceptre of Britannia," and the " Civis Romanus," irrational and vulgar as they are, have nevertheless a side which is not altogether ignoble, and are of a nature which it requires more than one generation to eradicate. Cobden approached this question of reduction by two different roads. He endeavoured to bring to bear upon it international action, by arrangements for a general limitation of armaments, in which, as regards France, there appeared more than once some possi- bility of success, and in which he was cordially supported by Bastiat in the years succeeding the repeal of the Corn Laws ; he also sought, by every means in his power, to urge it on his countrymen, by appeals to their good sense and self-respect. He exposed, firstly, our poHcy ; and secondly, our adminis- tration ; and showed, with irresistible arguments, that while the one was unsound, the other was extravagant ; and that thus the British people were condemned, not only to provide for what was useless and even dangerous, but at the same time to pay an excessive price for it. He tells us in his article on Russia, vol. i. p. 309 — *' If that which constitutes cowardice in individuals, viz., the taking excessive precautions against danger, merits the same designation when practised by com- munities, then England certainly must rank as the greatest poltroon among nations." It is incontestable that the extent of our precautions against danger should be proportioned to the degree of that danger, and it cannot, we think, be denied, even by those who are the most disposed to connect the greatness and security of England with the constant display of physical force, that as our liability to war has diminished, our preparations for it should also diminish ; and that it is as irrational to devote to our The Political Opinions of Richard Cobden 37 "Services" in a period of " Free Trade," colonial self- government, and non-intervention, the sums which were wrung from our industry in an epoch of monopoly, of colonial servitude, and of a ''spirited foreign policy," as it would be to pay the same insurance on a healthy as on a diseased life. For what are the causes (under her own control) which render a country liable to war? They may, for present purposes, be classed under the following heads : — 1. The disposition to engage in wars of conquest or aggression. 2. The necessity of maintaining, for the purpose of repressing liberty at home, large standing armies, which a Government may be compelled to employ in foreign wars, either to gratify the military spirit engendered by the existence of a powerful service, or to divert public attention from domestic reforms. 3. The habitual violation of the rights of labour and property in international relations, by prohibitive and protective laws of trade. 4. The policy of providing outlets for trade, and of introducing what are called the agencies of civiHsation, by means of consuls and missionaries, supported by gunboats and breech-loaders. 5. The pretension of holding the balance of power, and of interfering, with this object, in the affairs of other nations, with its result, the theory of armed diplomacy, which aims, by a display of force, at securing for a country what is assumed to be its due influence in foreign affairs. All these motives would be absolutely removed under a system of government such as that which Cobden advocated, and even now they are, we believe, very generally discredited, with the exception perhaps of the last, which must, however, be so cut down and modified in order to be a pretext for military armaments as to lose its general character. With the rejection of the doctrine of the "balance of power," a fruitful source of dangerous meddling in the affairs of foreign countries has been cut away. There only remains, therefore, the Hmited form of armed interference in foreign affairs to which we have 38 The Political Opinions of Richard Cob den already adverted, and which it is still thought by many among us, and even by a large section of the Liberal party we should be prepared to exert in certain events, and for which, if the principle be admitted, some allowance must be made in estimating the extent of our military and naval requirements. We refer to the supposed duty of England to resort to war in possible cases for the purpose of defending the principles of free government or international law, or of protecting a foreign country from wanton or unjust aggression. On this subject we have already stated what we believe to have been Cobden's view ; but, whatever margin may be left for this consideration, it must be admitted by candid reasoners that the liability of the country to war under a policy such as that of which the general outhnes have been traced would be reduced within narrow proportions. Cobden was often blamed for not devoting more time and labour to the task of minute resistance to the "Estimates" in the House of Commons. This was the result of his perfect conviction, after years of experience and observation, that such a course was absolutely useless, and that no private member, how- ever able or courageous, could cope in detail with the resources at the disposal of Government in evading exposure and resisting reductions. He therefore always insisted that the only course was to strike at the root of the evil, by diminishing the revenue and the expenditure in the gross. Taxation. — This brings us to our next topic, which is inextricably bound up with the last, viz., the reduction of the national expenditure, and the consequent diminu- tion of taxation, objects the importance of which is becoming yearly more vital. Cobden knew that no material reform in our financial system could be effected (for all that has been hitherto done has been to shift the burden, and not to diminish it) until our external policy was changed, and hence his incessant efforts in this direction ; but he also knew that the surest method of accomplishing the latter object was to diminish the resources at the disposal of Govern- ment for military and naval purposes. The first object in financial reform waSj therefore^ The Political Opinions of Richard Cobden 39 in Cobden's opinion, the gradual remission of indirect taxation. In a letter to the '' Liverpool Association " he made use of the remarkable expression that he considered them to be the only body of men in the country who appeared to have any faith in the future of humanity. His objects were threefold, and they are to our mind conclusive : — " I. The dangerous facilities indirect taxes afford for extravagant and excessive expenditure, by reason of their imperceptibility in collection, and of the con- sequent readiness of the people to submit to them, and also of the impossibiUty of insuring a close and honest adaptation of the revenue to the expenditure. '' 2. Their interference with the great law of free ex- change, one of the rights of property, and (so far as customs duties are concerned) the violation of inter- national equity which they involve ; for it is obvious that the conditions of international trade are essentially affected by taxes on imports and exports, and it is impossible to apportion them so as to insure that each country shall pay neither more nor less than its own due share. " 3. The enhancement of the cost of the taxed article to the consumer, over and above the amount of the tax." The root of the evil may again be traced to the in- fringement, in the case of indirect taxes, of the great law of '' free exchange of services, freely debated." A tax is nothing more than a service contributed to the State by the people, in return for a corresponding service rendered to the people by the State. The great object, therefore, in imposing a tax should be to con- nect it as closely as possible with the service for which it is required, and to facihtate as far as possible a close comparison between the two. The superiority of a direct tax, hke the income-tax and the poor-rate, over taxes on consumption and on trade, from this point of view, is apparent ; but such is the distorted view of large classes in the country on this subject, that they consider what we have characterised as the great vice of indirect taxation as its chief and distinguishing merit, and that the supreme art of government consists 40 The Political Opinions of Richard Cobden in extracting from the pockets of the people, by a sort of "hocus pocus," the largest possible amount of money without their knowing it. Do those who with so much naivete repeat this argu- ment whenever this question is discussed, ever reflect, that to drug the taxpayer before he pays his money will in no degree diminish the evil to a country of excessive taxation, and that ignorance and irresponsibiUty are not the best securities for an efficient and conscientious administration of our public affairs ? If it be objected that indirect taxation is the only method by which the masses of the people can be made to contribute their share to the revenues of the State, we reply that if the condition of the masses of the people in any country is such as to place them beyond the reach of direct taxation, it is the surest proof that the whole national economy is out of joint. The fulfilment of this policy should, we think, be rigorously exacted from every Liberal Government, till no taxes of customs or excise remain upon the statute- book, save those on tobacco and spirits, which our heritage of debt has placed it beyond the pale of hope to remove by any scheme of practical and proxi- mate reform. l^and. — Cobden held that the growing accumulation in the hands of fewer and fewer proprietors of the soil of the country was a great political, ^ R? nn °^ social, and economical evil ; and as this tendency is unquestionably stimulated by the system of our government, and some of our laws, which give it an artifical value, he foresaw that one of the principal tasks of the generation which succeeded him must be to liberate the land from all the unnecessary obstacles which impede its acquisition and natural distribution, and to place it under the undis- turbed control of the economic law. It is obvious that laws which keep land out of the market — laws of entail, laws of settlement, difficulties of transfer, as well as a system of government which gives to the possession of land an artificial value, for social or political purposes, over and above its natural commercial value — must have the inevitable effect of restricting the quantity, of enhancing the price, and of diminishing the product The Political Opinions of Richard Cob den 41 to be obtained. Land thus acquires a monopoly price, small capitals are deterred from this form of invest- ment, competition is restricted, production is dimi- nished, and the condition of those who live by the land, as well as of those who exchange the produce of their labour for the produce of the land, is neces- sarily impaired. In his speech at Rochdale, in November, 1864, which was his last public utterance, Cobden especially left this task as a legacy to the younger men among us, and told them that they could do more for their country in liberating the land than had been achieved for it in the liberation of its trade. Maritime Laws. — On the question of '' Maritime law," it is well known that he advocated the largest extension of the rights of neutrals, and the greatest possible limitation of the rights of belhgerents, as a necessary and logical accompaniment of a Free Trade policy. His views on this subject will be seen from a letter addressed to Mr. H. Ashworth, in 1862, in which he recommends the following three reforms : — i. Exemp- tion of private property from capture at sea during war by armed vessels of every kind. 2. Blockades to be restricted to naval arsenals, and to towns besieged at the same time by land, except as regards contraband of war. 3. The merchant ships of neutrals on the high seas to be inviolable to the visitation of alien Govern- ment vessels in time of war as in time of peace. In this letter he observes — " Free Trade, in the widest definition of the term, means only the division of labour by which the productive powers of the whole earth are brought into mutual co-operation. If this scheme of universal independence is to be liable to sudden dislocation whenever two Governments choose to go to war, it converts a manufacturing industry such as ours into a lottery, in which the lives and fortunes of multitudes of men are at stake. I do not comprehend how any British statesman who consults the interests of his country and understands the revolution which Free Trade is effecting in the relations of the world can advocate the maintenance of commercial blockades. If I shared their views I should shrink from promoting the indefinite growth of a population whose means of 42 The Political Opinions of Richard Cob den subsistence would be liable to be cut off at any moment by a belligerent power, against whom we should have no right of resistance, or even of complaint. " It must be in mere irony that the advocates of such a policy as this ask — Of what use would our navy be in case of war if commercial blockades were abolished ? Surely, for a nation that has no access to the rest of the world but by sea, and a large part of whose population is dependent for food on foreign countries, the chief use of a navy should be to keep open its communica- tions, not to close them ! I will only add that I regard these changes as the necessary corollary of the repeal of the Navigation Laws, the abolition of the Corn Laws, and the abandonment of our colonial monopoly." In most of the foregoing questions, Cobden, as we have said, was contented to preach sound doctrine, and to prepare the way for the ultimate adoption of principles of policy and government, which in his time he could not hope to see prevail. But he was destined, before the close of his career, once more to engage in a great practical work, and to identify his name with an accomplished success, scarcely inferior in its scope and results to the repeal of the English Corn Law. This was the Commercial Treaty with France. As the Corn Law was the great stronghold of mono- poly in England, so was the prohibitive system in France the key-stone of protection in Europe, and Cobden selected these accordingly, with the unerring instinct of real statesmanship, as the first points for attack, and fastened upon them with a tenacity and resolution which insured success. Fifteen years had elapsed since England had re- nounced, in principle at least, the false system of commercial monopoly, and, in Cobden's words quoted above, '' thrown away the sceptre of force, to confide in freedom." She had trusted to the teaching of her example, and to the experience of her extraordinary success, in leading the countries of Europe to answer to her appeal for co-operation in liberating trade, and vindicating the rights of labour ; but she had met with shght response. Our conversion was perhaps too recent, our course still too inconsistent, ancl our motives too much open to suspicion, to make this surprising, The Political Opinions of Richard Cobden 43 and, so far as Fiance was concerned, we had unfor- tunately contrived in all our reforms to retain in our tariff restrictions upon the staple articles of French production, wine and silk. The time had come >yhen, unless some new impulse could be given to inter- national intercourse, the forces of reaction might have again acquired the ascendency, and European progress have been thrown back for years. Our relations with France were those of chronic distrust and rivalry. The cry of Fcrfide Albion in France too often resounded in our ears ; and the bug- bear of French invasion was successively invoked on this side of the Channel no less than three times in the period we are considering. This was a state of things fraught with danger. Monopoly had borne as usual its deadly fruits, in alienating two great nations destined by nature for the closest relations of friendship and mutual dependence, and in fostering in both the spirit of war. It was under circumstances such as these that Cobden set his hand to the great work of co-operation which led to the Commercial Treaty. Bastiat, who would have hailed with dehght this tardy reparation of the defects in our reformed com- mercial system which he always deplored, was no longer ahve to aid the cause ; but to one of the most distinguished of modern French economists, Michel Chevalier, is due, in concert with Cobden, the merit of the scheme with the Governments of England and France were induced to adopt, which has opened to us the prospect of a new era of progress, in the gradual union of the nations of Europe in a great commercial federation, and in laying the foundations of a civilisa- tion which may yet keep pace with that now dawning on our race in the Anglo-Saxon republics of the Western world. As Cobden saw in his beneficent work the hope of a new era of peace, and of liberal progress in Europe, as its certain fruit, so did his opponents instinctively per- ceive that his success would carry with it the doom of the traditions of hatred and of fear, which the Govern- ments of Europe had too often successfully invoked, to plunge the people into wars of which they are the invariable victims, and to keep alive the rumours of 44 The Political Opinions of Richard Cob den war, which have deprived them of the sohd fruits of peace. So long as the pohtical condition of Europe is such as to render necessary or possible the large arma- ments which are a reproach to our age and boasted civilisation, while millions of men, in the flower of their age, are taken from productive industry, and supported by the labour of the rest of the population, no real and permanent progress can be made in the emancipation of the people, and in the estabHshment of free institu- tions. It was in the consciousness that by breaking down the barriers to commercial The Frencii intercourse between England and France, a greater impulse would be given than by any other event to the forces of progress in Europe, that the men who in both countries undertook and completed this international work entered upon their task. We speak freely of this episode in Cobden's Hfe, but it is necessary to vindicate his policy from charges which, although forgotten and overwhelmed in its extraordinary success, were brought against it too commonly, and from quarters whence it ought least to have been expected. In France Cobden was reproached by many of his earlier friends, whose sympathies were bound up with the Orleanist or Republican regimes, and who viewed with a natural aversion the Second Empire, for contri- buting to a work which, if successful, might do more than anything else to consoHdate the Imperial reign. He repHed, that what the immediate effect might be he neither knew nor cared, but that all the forces of free- dom were "solidaires," and that the ruler who gave '' Free Trade " to the nation, whether King, President, or Emperor, was doing that which, more than anything else, would assure the future liberties of France. The same causes operated in many quarters to make the Treaty unpopular in England ; but he was also assailed in a more insidious form. He was accused of having forgotten or forsaken the sound doctrines of political economy, of which he had in his earlier hfe been the uncompromising advocate, and of having revived the discarded policy of ''reciprocity treaties." The system of reciprocity treaties and tariff bargains was one of the natural but most pernicious developments of the doc- The Political Opinions of Richard Cobden 45 trines of protection. These arrangements aimed at the extension of the Hmits of monopoly, by securing for our products protection in a foreign country against the competition of all other countries, and always pro- ceeded on the supposed interest of the producer, to the injury of the consumer. They were logical, when it was believed or professed that the reduction of a duty was a sacrifice on the part of the country making it to the country in whose favour it was made. From this point of view it was natural, in making such reductions, to demand what were thought to be equivalent con- cessions from the country with which we were treating, and the supreme art of negotiating was held to consist in framing what had the appearance of a ^' nicely adjusted balance of equivalents," but in which each country secretly desired, and sought to obtain, the maximum of reductions from the other, against the minimum of its own. But from the Free Trade point of view, in which all reductions of duties, at least so far as productive duties are concerned, are an admitted and positive gain to the counti*y making them, it be- comes absurd and impossible to use them as the ground of a claim on a foreign country for compensating, or equivalent, remissions. The French Treaty had no affinity, except in form, to treaties such as these. Instead of a bargain in which each party sought to give as little and to get as much as possible, it was a great work of co-operation, in which the Governments of England and of France were re- solved, on both sides, to remove, within the limits of their power, the artificial obstacles to their commercial intercourse presented by fiscal and protective laws. England had already spontaneously advanced much further than France in this direction, and hence alone, if for no other reason, all idea of " equivalent " conces- sions was out of the question. She contributed her share to the work by sweeping from her tariff, with some trifling exceptions, all trace and remnant of pro- tection, and by reducing her fiscal duties upon wine and brandy. France, unable at one stroke to destroy the whole fabric of monopoly, nevertheless made a deadly breach in the edifice by substituting moderate duties for prohibition in the case of the chief British 46 The Political Opinions of Richard Cobden exports. If these reforms had been made exclusively in each other's favom- they might have been justly open to the charge of unsoundness, but they were made equally for the commerce of all the world, on the side of England immediately, on the side of France prospectively ; and thus, instead of reverting to a system of monopoly, the prohibitive and differential policy of France was annihilated, and the equal system of England maintained and consolidated. But the consequences of the Treaty with France were not confined to that country and to England. It was an act which, both by its moral effect and its direct and necessary influence on the legislation of the other Continental countries, has set on foot a movement which grows from year to year, and will not cease till all protective duties have been erased from the com- mercial codes of Europe. It was thus the rare privilege of the man who had been the foremost in giving the death-blow to monopoly in England to be also among the first to storm the citadel of protection on the Continent and to give to the work which he commenced at home a decisive international impulse, destined to afford new securities for the most sacred of human rights — the right of labour, and to add *'new realms to the empire of freedom." Cobden had yet another success awaiting him, to our mind the most signal triumph of his life. He lived to see the great moral and economic laws, which he had enforced through years of opposition and obloquy, asserting their control over the forces of reaction and moulding our foreign poHcy. It must have been with a superb and heartfelt satisfaction that Cobden watched the conflict of public opinion at the time of the Danish War. The diplomatic intervention of the Government had brought us to the verge of war and made it more than usually difiicult to retreat. The old instincts of the ruling classes of the nation were thoroughly aroused, and unless they had been neutralised and overpowered by stronger and deeper forces, we should, under a fancied idea of chivalry and honour (if anything can deserve these names which is opposed to reason and duty), have squandered once more the hard-earned The Political Opinions of Richard Cobden 47 heritage of English labour in a war of which the causes and the merits were for the most part unknown among us, and could never have been made intelHgible to the nation, and in which our success, if possible, might have thrown back all liberal progress for years, both in England and on the Continent. But it soon became manifest that a nobler and larger morality had been gaining ground in the heart of the nation, had at last found its expression in the Councils of the State, and had enforced its control over those who still believed that the mission of England is to hold by force the balance of power in Europe. The memorable debate which decided the course of our policy in this critical moment decided far greater issues ; and the principle of " non-intervention," as it has been explained above, the only hope for the moral union of nations and the progress of freedom, became the predominating rule of our foreign policy. In reviewing the political programme given in the preceding pages, we shall see that while much has been done far more remains to do ; and that, although there is great cause for hope, there is also much ground for fear. Of all the dreams in which easy-going and half- hearted politicians indulge, the idlest appears to be that in which it is fondly imagined that the days of party strife are over and that no questions lie before us, on which the majority of moderate and honest men are not agreed. It is useless to shut our eyes to the fact that before the future greatness and prosperity of our country can be assured, great issues must be raised and fierce political struggles traversed. We have a firm and confident belief that the forces on the side of progress are sufficient to achieve what is required for this consummation by peaceful and constitutional reform ; but the cause will not be won without strenuous efforts. It will not be won without the aid of men who, in the measure of their gifts, will bring to bear upon the task the qualities of which in Cobden's life we have such enduring proofs : pure morality, keen intelligence, perfect disinterestedness, undaunted courage, indomit- 48 The Political Opinions of Richard Cobden able tenacity of purpose, high patriotism, and an immovable faith in the predestined triumph of good over evil. That the principles of public morality which Cobden devoted his life to enforce will ultimately prevail in the government of the world we think that no one who beheves in God or man can doubt. Whether it be in store for our country first to achieve by their adoption the last triumphs of civihsation and to hold her place in the van of human progress, or whether to other races and to other communities will be confided this great mission, it is not for us to determine. But those who trust that this may yet be England's destiny, who, in spite of much which they deplore, delight to look upon her past with pride and her future with hope, will ever revere the memory of Cobden as of one whose lifelong aim it was to lay the foundations of her empire in her moral greatness, in the supremacy of reason, and in the majesty of law — and will feel with us that the " international man " was also, and still more, an Englishman. UNWIN BROTHERS, LIMITED, THE GRESIIAM PRESS, WOKING ANP LONDON. PAMPHLETS. A B C of Free Trade, The. By E. N. Buxton. 3d. American Progress and British Commerce. By Harold Cox. 3d. Balance of Trade, The. By the Right Hon. G. Shaw-Lefevre. 3d. British Customs Union, A. By His Honour Judge Shaw. 3d. Brussels Convention, The, and Free Trade. 3d. Cobden, A Short Life of. By Frances Cooke. id. Cobden, Morley's Life of. Paper Covers, is. Danish Farmers are Free Traders, Why. By A. Peschcke Koedt. 3d. Does Trade Follow the Flag ? By the First Lord Farrer. 3d. Fact versus Fiction. The Cobden Chib's Reply to Mr. Chamberlain. (Cassell & Co.) is. Free Trade and British Commerce. By Lord AVEBURY. 3d. Free Trade and British Commerce. By A. MoxGREDiEX. Revised 1903. 3d. Free Trade and the English Farmer. By ''One of his Friends." 3d. Policy of Free Imports, The. By Harold Cox. Id. Sugar Convention, The Case Against the. By G. H. Perris. 3d. Things Seen and Things Unseen. Translated from the French of F, Bastiat. 3d. Wages, The Effect of Protection on. By the late Lord Playfah^. 3d. CDe Centenarp Portrait of RicDara Cobaen. Aftcf LOWES-DICKINSON, by ^^PANURGE/' Suitable for Framing. About 12 X i8 in. PRICE SIXPENCE. THE COBDEN CLUB, 28, VICTORIA ST., S.W GAYLAMOUNT PAMPHLET BINDEH Manu/aclurtd i 6AYLORD BROS Syracuse, N. ^ Stocldon, Cali 14 DAY USE RETURN TO DESK FROM WHICH BORROWED LOAN DEPT. This book is due on the last date stamped below, or on the date to which renewed. Renewed books are subject to immediate recall. m.m^ Ma^ l:& UAp r' e s m VMiAA^ o: MAY 14 196? RCCTD LD APR 2 5 1962 LD 21A-50m-12,'60 (B6221sl0)476B General Library University of California Berkeley >,