^ l9l UC-NRLF B a Tfl3 31b THE, 5HATTUCK LLCTURL An Anatomic and Mechanistic Conception of Disease BY JOEL E. GOLDTHWAIT, M. D. BOSTON REPRINTED PROM THE BOSTON MEDICAL AND SURGICAL JOURNAL JUNE SEVENTEEN 1915 t • . . « » . * , » » • « • • ■« c c c / [Reprinted from the Boston Medical and Suroicai, Jotrxal, Vol. clxxii, No. 2t, pp. 881-898, June 17, 1915.] AN ANATOMIC AND MECHANISTIC CONCEPTION OF DISEASE.* By Joel E. Goldthwait, M.D., Boston. The subject which ha.s been announced for this, the twenty-sixth lecture given under the conditions of the bequest made by Dr. Shattuck, was chosen after much consideration as being of broad general interest and as having to do with the fundamentals of medical knowledge. It seemed possible that such a consideration might be of sufficient importance to be worthy of the occasion, and if it be so considered it will be a satisfaction to me, as being a slight return for the honor which you have conferred upon me in selecting me as your speaker. The basis of that wliich is here presented is M^ork which has been carried on for a number of years in the attempt to find the cause of the chronic disease conditions for which the ortho- pedist is consulted. A fairly exhaustive patho- logic investigation failing to show more than the nature of the lesion, with similar experience from the bacteriologic and the biochemical in- vestigations, led to the study of the fundamental anatomic conditions existing in patients afflicted with these diseases, with results which have been increasingly more suggestive the farther the study has been carried. * Delivered before The Massachusetts Medical Society at Boston, June 8, 1915. 1 .*/. : :.*• :'.'••••••• It is this study which represents the first part of this paper and which has been reported in part from time to time by the w^riter in articles which have called attention to the variations in the formation of the viscera and skeleton, as well as to the peculiarities of the particular function.^ In this investigation it soon became evident that the anatomic formation described in the textbooks as normal to the human being, rarely exists in the individual having the common chronic disease, and in the study which natur- ally followed not only were the different ana- tomic types recognized, but in the hope of better understanding the variations found, the struc- ture of the lower orders of mammals was studied with considerable care. Recently, with the assistance of Dr. John Bryant, not only have these anatomic findings been verified in connection with his work,^ but the literature has been carefully examined and the fact that most of the elements to be presented have already been recorded has served to in- crease the belief that the observations here stated are correct and that the appreciation of these elements is absolutely essential if any impres- sion is to be made by our profession upon the great field of chronic medicine which today rep- resents such a reproach to us. The fact that no more has been accomplished as the result of these numerous contributions to medical literature in the past is probably due to tlie fact that most of the work is fragmentary in character and that it is only by piecing together many of these separate contributions that the significance of each with the great importance of the whole is realized. It is the hope, that in this communication, the independent observations which have been car- ried on by the speaker, may be so strengthened by the similar findings of these other observers that this knowledge may be generally applied to the study of our patients. In such an investigation, while the first thing that impresses one is that the so-called normal type of human being rarely exists in the chronic patient, the second is that the variations from the normal group themselves into two general types from which again there are many varia- tions, but that if the original type is appreciated the variations from it are easily traced and un- derstood. In order to understand better the types to be described, it is well to consider for a moment that which from the textbooks we call normal. Normal Human Type. (Figs. 1, 2 and 3). There is very little variation to be found in the works of anatomy in that which is called nor- mal. The torso is of moderate length and of moderate breadth. The thorax is full, and moderately rounded, the upper abdomen is rounded and in circumference about the same as that taken just above the nipple. The costal border is formed in an angle from 70° to 90°. The diaphragm is high and there is generous space under the ribs for the viscera. All of the abdominal viscera, except the lower portions of the colon Math the sigmoid and part of the small intestine, are above the umbilicus. Around the viscera and representing a definite part of their support, as well as giving much protection from trauma to the sympathetic nerves, ganglia and blood vessels, are well-defined masses of fat. The lower abdomen is flat, while the upper abdo- men is firm and rounded, there being no marked depression under or inside the edge of the ribs. The spine shows a mild curve forward in the lum- 3 Fig. 1. Tlie normal human type. FiQ. 2. Xormal human type, showing the normal inclination of pelvis, normal elevation of ribs, normal position of shoulders, etc. Fig. 3. Normal human type, showing the moderate breadth of the body. 6 bar region, with the inclination backward from the mid-lumbar, this resulting in the general in- clination of the abdominal cavity of 30° down- ward and forward from the perpendicular. The pelvis, in the axis of its cavity, is inclined down- ward and backward about 60° from the perpen- dicular so that the two axes form nearly a right angle. Of the special viscera, the stomach is of the pear shape, and is placed well up under the ribs, occupying the uppermost part of the abdominal cavity upon the left side. In this position the discharge of its contents into the duodenum re- quires but little effort. The small intestine is about 20 feet in length, is of good calibre and muscular tone. The large intestine, of five to six feet in length, is adherent to the posterior abdominal wall upon the right side until it reaches the region of the liver, when it turns forward and inward, crossing with a slight downward sag to tlie splenic flexure well up in the left side of the abdomen behind the stomach, from which point it is again attached to the posterior wall (retroperitoneal) until it reaches the sigmoid, where, after a few turns, it becomes the rectum. The transverse part of the colon is attached to the liver upon the right side and to the stomach in the center of the body and upon the left side. The stomach and liver are naturally attached to the diaphragm, and the suspensory ligament of the diaphragm is the pericardium, especially the right side, which is finally attached to the anterior part of the low cervical spine. In the upper part of the abdomen in the solar plexus of the sympathetic system, the ganglia being so placed that when the organs are in 7 their proper position there can be the least possi- ble pressure upon or irritation of them. These and many other elements are described in the anatomy as normal, and while this type does exist very commonly among those who are well, nevertheless, among the individuals who consult the physician, especially with chronic disease, this type is not often seen, and it must be hard to understand the conditions present in our patients unless their special structural for- mation is known. Of the variations from the normal there are two well-marked types which are easy of recog- nition and are here described. Splanchn opt otic (Glennard) ; Congenital Vis- ceroptotic ( Goldthwait,^ Smith^) ; Carnivorous (Treves,* Werner,^ Bryant^) ; Hyper-o-nto- morph (Bean**) ; Macroscelous (Montessori^) ; ''Narrow-Backed" (Industrial). (Figs. 4, 5, 6 and 7). The type of human being for Avhich the above and other terms have been used is essentially dif- ferent from the so-called normal in most of its characteristics. The whole figure is lighter, not only that there is less fat, but the skeleton is lighter and more slender in form. The skin is soft and delicate. The hair is more abundant in the usual places and frequentlj^ shows on parts where it is not normally seen. The individual is usually either tall and slender or small and delicate. The head is proportionately large, the face and jaws are narrow. The palatal arch is high. The adenoid and tonsillar tissue is apt to be excessive. The ears are usually large and prominent, projecting outward and forward. The torso is longer in proportion than the so- called normal and is also narrower. (Fig. 6). 8 Kl(i. 4. The slender congenital \iseeroptotic or carnivorous type, showing the proportionately greater length of body, the increased low lum- bar curve, forward inclination of pelvis, forward position of the shoulder, flat chest, prominent lower abdomen, narrow upper ab- domen, forward position of head, etc. I 9 Fio. 5. Slender type, showing the same features as in Fig'. 4, except an increase in the forward inclination of the pelvis and more marked forward position of the shoulder, and a more completely flattened chest. 10 FiO. 6. The congenitally visceroptotic type, showing the extremely slender back. 11 Fig. 7. The slender or congenital visceroptotic type in child, showing the same general characteristics as in adult. 12 The increased length is partly in the thorax, but chiefly in the lumbar region. The ribs are usually longer than is normal, the tenth rib is almost always free, aiid when seen in the adult, the downward inclination of the lower ribs is very marked, they at times, in the standing posi- tion, touching the upper part of the ilia. The spine is smaller in size than normal and the lum- bar vertebrae are more like the so-called normal dorsal vertebrae in shape, the body being of about the same width laterally as it is deep antero-posteriorly. (Fig. 8). There are fre- FlG. 8. Lumbar vertebra in slender tyi>e, showing small body to the bone, with slender laminae and with flat articular processes. quently six vertebrae in the lumbar region with the full number of sacral vertebrae, this being one of the reasons for the greater proportionate length of the body. The transverse processes are small and short and the articular processes are usually flat (not crescentic). Because of this 13 formation, the lumbar spine is much more flexi- ble than the normal type and it is this anatomic type from which the fancy dancer, the hurdler and acrobat are developed. The thorax is of fair size, the lungs are ap- parently smaller than normal, and the smaller size of the heart is easily demonstrated by the x-ray. The abdominal viscera have peculiarities in shape and attachment unlike the normal hu- man. The stomach is long and tubular, instead of the normal pear shape. Its attachments are less firm, so that the possible downward displace- ment in standing is much greater than normal. The duodenum is usually attached to the normal position, but this is not constant. The small intestine as a whole is much shorter than normal, containing from 10 to 15 feet instead of the nor- mal 20 feet, the walls are less thick, and the lu- men smaller. According to Bean,** the length is from 12 to 15 feet ; Swaim^ from 10 feet up ; Bryant^ from 10 to 15. The mesentery is longer than normal, so that in standing the small in- testine is almost entirely in the upper pelvis or lower abdomen. The large intestine is shorter than normal, from three to five feet, and much more mobile. Almost always upon the right side there is a free mesentery so that this por- tion may change its position easily, and fre- quently the left side also has a mesentery, so that in the upright position the entire colon lies below the crests of the ilia. The most common condition, however, is with the normal retro- peritoneal position upon the left side with the right side free. The transverse part of the colon is usually attached to the stomach, which means that it will be found below the position of the stomach, even though the stomach may have its lower border in the pelvis. With the transverse 14 colon, while it is usually attached to the stomach, it frequently has an entirely free mesentery, as is natural with even the purely normal type in the early embryologie state. In this type the vermiform appendix is usually well developed, while in the next type to be described the ap- pendix apparently is much less developed, which may in part explain the common occurrence of appendicitis in the thin, slender individuals. With this type of anatomy there is very little retroperitoneal fat, palpation of the flanks is easy, the kidneys are naturally mobile, the liver is smaller and is more loosely attached than nor- mal. It is this type of anatomy in which the sca- phoid type of scapula (Graves^) is found. The muscles are formed of the long and slender fibres. The extremities vary in lengtii as one would suppose in studying comparative anatomy, the carnivora at times having very long legs, as the greyhound, or very short legs, as the otter, but they are usually longer than is considered normal and both arms and legs are relatively slender. The feet are slender and often of un- naturally high arch. The hands are slender but long, the fingers being very slender and tapering. While this type is usually thin, at times there is much accumulation of fat. If this is present it usually develops rapidly, disappearing at times equally rapidly, and the fat is always soft with very little connective tissue and suggests poor health. Uerbivorous (Treves,* Werner,^ Bryant^) ; "Broad Backed" (Industrial) ; Meso-onto- niorph (Bean*') ; Brachyscelous (Montessori^). (Figs. 9, 10, 11 and 12). Upon the other side of the normal human type, 15 t Fio. 9. The heavy or extreme herbivorous t.vi>e, showing the large, heavy build of the body throughout, the relatively straight position of the i)elvis, the backward bend occurring in the upper lumbar region rather than in the low lumbar, showing the lound-shaped liead, flat ear, broad neck, with the shoulder well back on the thorax. 16 Fig. 10. The broad backed or herbivorous type, showing the extremely broad body. ' 17 Fig. 11. The broad, heavy type, showing all the general characteristics of Figs. 9 and 10. 18 Fig. 12. The broad, herbivorous type in the child, showing the same general characteristics of position of pelvis, curves of spine, position of shoulder, hiffh chest, prominent upper abdomen, broad face, flat ears, as in Figs. 9, 10 and 11. Tlie position of hyperextension at the dorso lumbar juncture is well shown in this figure. 19 and in marked contrast to the slender, carnivor- ous type, is the heavily built, broad backed type of human, in which so many of the characteris- tics are similar to those found in the herbivor- ous creatures that this term has been used for their designation. In this type the body is built upon much heavier lines throughout. The skeleton is larger in proportion and heavier in structure. The muscles are large with coarse fibres. The skin is coarse with scant growth of hair, which is lost early. There is an excess of fat throughout the body, but this is bound together with much con- nective tissue so that the flesh feels hard and firm in contrast to the soft, flabby feel such as is peculiar to the slender type. The head is round, the face is broad, the jaw is square, the ears are usually placed flat against the side of the head, and as a rule are not very large. The neck is short and thick, the shoulders are broad and square. The body as a whole is broad and rela- tively short. The chest is larger both in the later- al and antero-posterior diameters than the nor- mal. The diaphragm is high, the costal border is formed in a broad angle, rarely less than 90° and sometimes more. The tenth rib is usually attached to the conjoined cartilages in front and the last t"\yo ribs are relatively short. The lum- bar region is short, partly because of the fre- quent presence of only four lumbar vertebrae and partly because the sacrum is set well down between the wings of the ilia. The abdominal cavity is broad and deep. The stomach is large and pear shaped. The duodenum is attached as in the normal. The small intestine as a whole is much longer than the normal, and ranges from 25 to 39 feet (Bryant^). The large intestine is larger and longer than normal, from five to eight 20 and one-half feet (Swaim*), with the retroperi- toneal attachment of the ascending and descend- ing portions, the added length showing in the longer transverse portion and in the sigmoid. The liver is large but well up under the dia- phragm. There is much retroperitoneal and general abdominal fat so that the kidneys are well held in place and the sympathetic ganglia are well protected. The joints in this type are much less flexible than in either of the other types, the individuals as a whole being strongly and heavily built. The spine is broad and heavy throughout, but in the lumbar region this is especially notice- able. The lateral diameter of the vertebral bodies in this region is considerably greater than the antero-posterior (Fig. 13). the articular pro- FlG. 13. Lumbar vertebra of heavy or herbivorous type, showing the broad body and the heavy laminae. 21 cesses are strong and large and almost always of the crescentic type. The transverse processes are long and broad, and the process of the last lumbar frequently forms an articulation (the lumbo sacral transverse articulation) with the top of the sacrum. The long and broad trans- verse processes upon the lumbar spine are simi- lar to that which is found in the herbivorous ani- mals and which produces the lateral rounding of the back seen in all the hoof-footed creatures. This formation apparently furnishes protection and attachment for the many coils of intestine in the abdominal cavity. Because of the shape of the vertebrae and the character of the articulation with the sacrum, there is less lumbar curve forward than is pres- ent in either of the other types (Figs. 1 and 2 and 4 and 5 ) , and the forward inclination of the pelvis is also less. The axis of the sacrum is more nearly perpendicular. In this type not only are the wings of the ilia higher than in the normal so that the transverse process of the last lumbar articulates not only with the sacrum, but also at times with the ilium, and in a few cases the transverse process of the vertebrae above also rests against the ilium or has strong liga- mentous attachment to it. The extremities in this type vary in length as one would expect from the study of the compara- tive anatomy of the herbivorous creatures, but are always heavy. The legs are large, the knees are straight, the feet are broad in proportion to length, and the arch, while it may be very strong is usually quite low. The arms are heavily built, and the shoulder attachment is well back upon the thorax, giving the square shoulder appear- ance. The hands are broad and "chubby," both in the palmar portion and in the fingers. 22 Spinal Motions of the Different Types. Because of the different structure of the bones of the spine, the motions must vary. In the nor- mal, in bending forward the spine is well rounded and laterally there is some motion be- ginning at the lumbo sacral juncture and extend- ing up to the low dorsal region, while in back- ward bending considerable motion is allowed. In the carnivorous type this is similar, only the amount of motion is much greater, as would be expected from the description of the bony formation of the type. With the herbivor- ous type, as must be apparent, the spinal mo- tions are much less free. In this, the forward bending is made largely at the hips, there be- ing but little in the spine. Laterally practically no motion is allowed except at the dorso lumbar juncture, none whatever being allowed in the low back if the lumbo sacral transverse joint exists. If this exists upon one side, no motion at that region will be allowed to that side, while to the other side slight motion may be allowed. In backward bending very little is allowed, and if the lumbo sacral transverse joint exists, none will be allowed at the lumbo sacral juncture. Such are the three general types which are com- mon in the human family, and as to the fact that such tj'pes exist, there can be no question, if the passersby upon the street are noticed, even if one is not willing to accept the statements of those who have studied anatomy in this way. The thin carnivorous person is there side by side with the broad, full-faced herbivorous person, with the normal human also present, and the character- istics are so distinct that nothing more than the glance is necessary to recognize the special form. The characteristics are equally apparent in child- 23 hood as in adult life, as is indicated by the ac- companying illustrations. The difference in the types and the fitness of each for different forms of work is already known, and a person who is at the head of an organization employing large numbers of labor- ers states that when an order for laborers is given it is expected that it will indicate so many "broad backs" or so many "narrow backs." The "broad back" is fitted for the ordinary heavy work, while the "narrow back" is fitted for the work requiring greater agility, such as climbing poles or trees, prospecting, running the lines, etc. The "broad back" carries the heavier load, but the "narrow back" carries his lighter load more rapidly. The. difference in the anatomic types is also recognized consciously or unconsciously, in art, and nothing can be more perfectly normal than the early (not always the late) Greek figures, or Michael Angelo's "David," or "William Hunt's "Bathers." The type which Rubens almost al- ways depicts is the heavy, full-blooded herbivor- ous type, while the slender, carnivorous type is the one depicted by Botticelli and Fra Angelico, or by Puvis de Chavannes of the modem school. The fact that such types exist, but that they also have different characteristics which should be recognized in their training, is shown by Dr. Montessori in her book, "Pedagogical Anthro- pology," in which the pictures of the types are shown and the intellectual characteristics discussed. In athletics also the appreciation of the dif- ferent physical types is clearly understood. The hurdler or the runner is usually of the normal or the slender type, while the hammer thrower, the shot putter or the wrestler is usually of the 24 heavy type. The heavy men are usually found in the line of the football team, while in the backfield the more slender and agile persons are found. The types exist, and in a very large . number of instances the types are pure, the carnivorous being carnivorous throughout, the normal hu- man being the normal human throughout, and the same is true of the herbivorous. In other instances, however, the types are mixed, and it is here that the greatest difficulty exists in under- standing the symptoms or in planning the treat- ment. A carnivorous type in general build and viscera may have an herbivorous type of spine, a combination which is quite common in women. A carnivorous type of stomach and intestine may exist with a normal liver and kidneys, in so far as shape and position are concerned. The normal type in general may have one or many of the characteristics of either the carnivorous or the herbivorous. The herbivorous type may show characteristics of either of the others and prob- ably the most common variation in this type is the smaller spine and the imperfectly attached colon, but of the full length. That such differences exist in the anatomic formation of members of the human family there can be no question, and it is not unreasonable to expect such differences if the biologic princi- ples of the development of the race are con- sidered. The human being as the highest type of mammal naturally inherits something of the strains which have shown themselves in the vari- ous species through which the advance of the mammalian group has occurred, and it is only by studying comparative anatomy that the vari- ous differences of type can be understood. From the purely medical point of view the 25 recognition of these different types is important since the types apparently carry their own po- tential of disease. The tuberculous and the in- fections in general, the nervous diseases and acute mental disorders, the hyperglandular dis- turbances, the progressive anemias, the atrophic arthritis, many of the intestinal disorders, etc., naturally are associated with the slender type. The arterio-sclerosis, hypertrophic arthritis, gout, diabetes (not the insipidus), chronic dis- ease of the kidney, gall stones, the prostatic hypertrophy, the degenerative mental disorders, etc., are common to the heavy type. The sug- gestiveness of this in treatment must be obvious. Habits of Posture in the Different Types and the Effect upon the Physiology. Not only has the study of the chronic patient shown that the different anatomic types exist, but that this alone can hardly explain all the phenomena. The more the problem is studied, the more evident it becomes that the life of the creature as an erect biped is a very different thing from that of the quadruped in so far as the function of the different parts is concerned. One of the penalties that the human being is forced to accept in his being the highest type of mammal, is that in locomotion, with the body used as an erect biped, gravity is constantly operating to drag the organs downward out of their normal position, as well as to draw the up- per part of the body downward and forward into positions which must mean strain and weak- ness. This element, together with the anatomic form, seems many times sufficient to cause the conditions seen in chronic medicine. The counteracting element, to offset such a handicap and prevent the race from being irre- 26 parably harmed, is the intelligence with which the human being is peculiarly endowed. The real purpose of such a paper as this is to help in the training of tliis intelligence so that life may be a period of wholesome, healthy development, with the fullest possible energy available for whatever stress to which the individual may be subjected. The way the body is used is of quite as much importance as the structure of the body itself Either type has the potential of good health i^ used rightly, but each has an equally definite potential of disease if the proper relationship between the many parts is not preserved. With the normal type it is naturally easier to maintain this relationship, but the possibility of not main- taining it is painfully apparent as one goes among one's fellow men. With the other types the special postures or the form of the malad- justment naturally differs as one would expect from the structure. Since the pathologic changes which are seen are apparently due very largely to this imper- fect adjustment of the parts, it is of the first im- portance that the postures or special elements of maladjustment which are peculiar to the dif- ferent types should be appreciated. It should also be remembered that with the chronic pa- tient the large majority of the cases fall into the slender, congenital visceroptotic type or the broad, herbivorous type. The Normal Human. When the body is used rightly (Fig. 1 or 2), all of the structures are in such adjustment that there is no particular strain on any part. The physical powers are at their best, the mental functions are performed most easily, and the 27 personality or spirit of the individual possesses its greatest strength. When used rightly, or fully erect, the feet, knees, hips, spine, shoulders, head and all the portions which represent the frame of the body, are used in balance, with the greatest range of movement possible without strain. In this po- sition the chest is held high and well expanded, the diaphragm is raised, and the breathing and heart action are performed most easily. The ab- dominal wall is firm and flat, and the shape of the abdominal cavity resembles an inverted pear (Forbes, Williams^®') (Fig. 14), large and round- ed above and small below. The ribs have only a moderate downward inclination. The subdia- phragmatic space is ample to accommodate the viscera. In this position, also, there is no undue pressure upon, or interference with, the pelvic viscera or with the large ganglia at the back of the abdomen and in the pelvis. Relaxed Position. If the body is drooped or relaxed, so that the shoulders drag forward and downward, the whole body suffers, the weight is thrown imper- fectly upon the feet, so that the arch must be strained ; the knees are slightly sprung, which shows by the crepitating joints; the pelvis is changed in its inclination, with strain to the sacro-iliac joints and low back. The increased forward curve of the upper dorsal spine results not only in strain to the intraspinous ligaments, but also forces the shoulders forward, with fre- quent irritation of the bursae about the shoul- ders, or compression of the brachial plexus, with pain and neuralgias in the arms, while the cran- ing forward of the head must result in strain to the posterior part of the cervical spine. 28 Fig. 14. (Williams.) 29 / In this position the chest is necessarily low- ered, the lungs are much less fully expanded than normal, the diaphragm is depressed, the ab- dominal wall is relaxed, so that with the lessened support of the abdominal wall, together with the lowering of the diaphragm, the abdominal or- gans are necessarily forced downward and for- ward. When this occurs the possibility of me- chanical interference with the function of the organs is not difficult to imagine, and it becomes apparently a mere matter of chance which organ is affected. The thing that is important in the interpreta- tion of the many symptoms which the patients describe is that the body is most intimately re- lated in its different parts so that no one part can be used wrongly without the body as a whole suffering. For this reason, if these vari- ous groups of symptoms are to be considered as purely local and distinct lesions, the results are sure to be unsatisfactory. The body as a whole should be considered and not just the chest or the abdomen or the feet or the back or any one part, and it should be considered with reference to use in the different positions in the routine of life, especially those which are main- tained for long periods, the occupational pos- tures. In sitting it is perfectly possible to sit so that the trunk is in practically the same shape and with the different parts in practically the same relation, as they are when the body is used fully erect. At the same time in sitting it is very common to have the body markedly drooped, so that the body is rounded forward with the lumbar spine entirely reversed in its curve, with the ribs low, so that the thorax prac- tically telescopes into the abdominal cavity. When such a position is studied with reference 30 to the mechanics of the function of the organs the wonder is not that disturbances result, but that the disturbances are not more marked. In such a study of the mechanics of the physiology, the positions assumed when the pa- tient is lying down should be investigated. It is perfectly possible to produce practically the same effect upon the shape of the body and upon the thoracic and abdominal cavities that is pres- ent when the patient is sitting in the slouched position, if when lying down several pillows are placed under the head and shoulders, as is so frequently seen. In such a position naturally the breathing and circulation, the digestion, and the other physiological functions cannot go on rightly, and the restless, dreaming sleep is many times due to no other cause than this. The importance of the proper relationship of the parts should be borne in mind under all conditions, and especially at the times of occu- pation or when the postures are assumed for continuous periods. It is under such conditions that naturally the greatest harm results, and it should be remembered that irrespective of the type, the postures which are assumed as the body is used determine very largely whether the individual is to be well or ill. The most perfect, anatomically, may have the poorest health, while the most imperfect, anatomically, may have good health. Fig. 15 is of the normal type as is shown when the body is held erect (Fig. 16) but the posture commonly maintained (Fig. 15) suggests very little of normal vigor- ous health. The postures which are assumed by the other anatomic types are perfectly characteristic, so that once they are appreciated, the posture it- self very largely indicates the type of anatomy 31 Flo. 15. The normal human tyi>e, with acquired habits of bad posture, with ni;irke