T
UNIVERSITY
OF CALIFORNIA
LOS ANGELES
SCHOOL OF LAW
LIBRARY
IMPARTIAL THOUGHTS
UPON THE
BENEFICIAL CONSE Q^U E N C E S
INROLLI NG
Deeds, Wills, and Codicils affeding Lands,
THROUGHOUT ENGLAND AND WALES.
B Y
FRANCIS PLOWDEN, Es(^
CONVEYANCER,
LONDON
TRINTED FOR E. BROOKE, IN BELL-VARO^
TEMPLE-BAR.
M.DCC.LXXXIX.
r
To THE PUBLIC.
FROM my experience of the mifchiefs arlfing
from the imperfe6tion of the prefent regifter-
ing Afts for the Counties of York and Middlefex,
as well as from the v/ant of an univerfal Inrolment
of Deeds and Wills afFefting Land, I feci it my
duty to apprize the public of- the evil they are fuf-
fering, and to fuggeft a remedy) that will not only
eradicate the diforder, but add ftrength and vigour
to the part affeded. For the fatisfaftion, however,
of the public and of myfelf, I firft fubmitted it to
the confideration of all the Judges and Law Officers
of the country, to which I willi it to be applied;
mod of whom have done me the honour to exprefs
the ftrongeft approbation of the plan, and a wilh to
fee it carried into execution. I do not fay this
with a view to bias the opinion of any individual,
but to prove that I have acquitted myfelf of every
preliminary duty to the public, before I prefented
to them this publication.
It is now offered to them as the only mean, by
which their previous knfc of the expedient can be
tried and known.
As it is my defign to reduce the feveral a6ts of
parliament upon the fubjeft, to one plain, confift-
ent and efficient ftatute, I expecft that a candid
public will approve of my going rather largely into
the inconfiftencies and mifchiefs of fuch ads, as I
have thought neceflary to be repealed.
A 2 The
t iv ]
The confiderations, motives, and reafons for my
digefting and propofing to the public a plan for an
univerfal Inrolment of all Deeds and Wills affect-
ing Land, will, I hope, have their full weight in
forming the opinions of individuals upon the ex-
pediency of it. Thefe are, to the Land Owner., the
encreafe of the value of his land, by clearing and
confirming his title to it, and facilitating the means
of fettling, charging, or felling it : to the Monied
Many the multiplication, certainty, and faith of
land fecurities : to the Lawyer, the eafe, fatisfac-
tion, and furety both of his client and himfelf in
all negotiations refpefting lands : to the Financiery
the general rife of the value of land in the market,
which muft proportionably raife the price of the
funds : and to the Senator, the good and quiet of
the fubjed:, the confiftency and certainty of the
law, and the welfare and profpcrity of the nation.
FRANCIS PLOWDEN.
Adelphi 'Terrace,
CON.
C O N T E N T S.
JNTRODUCTION, Page i
Reajons for the Publication^ 2
Apology to the Profejfion, ■ 3
General Ideas of our Law, 3
The ancient Tenures of Land in England^ 5
The free Power of aliening Land in a commercial
Country^ 6
The Notoriety of the fi7-fi AlIs of Alienation 'of
Landy 7
The Plaiifibility of popular Prejudices^ 1 1
Proofs of the ancient Notoriety in the Alienation of
Lands ^ 1 4
OfUfes, 15
Reafons of J'ome Deeds not being inr oiled ^ 16
Of Lands being de^-jifeable^ I q
Of the Introduction of Secret Cofiveyances^ a i
Further Proofs cf the ancient Notoriety of all
Deeds affecting Lands, 22
Thefiiperior Neceffity of fuch Notoriety in the fre-
fenty more than in any pafi Age, 24
How Grievances are Jometimes redrejfed in Par-
Uamentf i-j
The
[ vi ]
^The Ahjurdity and Inefficacy of the ^th and ^tb
IViUiam and Mary^ to prevent Fraud by clan-^
dejline Mortgages ^ Page 3 1
Of Notice^ 35
The different Opinwis of our Courts upon the Effects
of Notice, 39
The Determination of all the "Parliaments of France
upon the Notice of a Deed regijieredy 42
FraEiical Applications to the foregoing Suhje^ls, 43
The Cafes of Rickman v. Morgan j and Pearfon
V. Morgan, 46
Of Title-Deeds, 5 1
A fuppofed Cafe upon a Title under Deeds not in-
rolled, 52
A real Cafe anonymous, upon fraudulent Mort'
g^g^^y S3
Of the Regijlry of Deeds and Wills hy different
A5ls of Parliament, ^2>
Of the Effects of certain Words in Deeds, and the
modern Forms of Conveyances, 67
The Ccrfequences of a Deed not regiflered, 6^
TBe Coffequences of a Deed regiftered, 70
The Mif chiefs of the regijlerin^ A5is, 73
A Regijlry ought to be a Confervatory of Men's
Title-Deeds, 75
There appear to have been fuch Confervatories by
the ^th lien. W, and by the ^d and ^th Edw,
VL 76
Of the Inrolment of Deeds by common Law, 77
Of the Acknowledgment of Deeds by common
Law^ " 80
Of
[ vii ]
Of the Iwolment of Deeds hy StatiiHy Page 8 2
Of the Fffe5ls of inr oiling Deeds y 82
Of the Inrolment of Roman Catholic's Deeds ^ 86
Of the IfKonftJlency of the nth and nth of Wil.
III. and the id Geo. I. ^ 89
Of the Inconveniences of the 2^ Geo. I. 91
Of the unconjlitutional Hardfhip of the 3^
Geo. I. 92
Of further Inconveniences of the 3^ Geo. I. 93
A fup-pofed Cafe upon the 'Title of a Paf)iji before
the Repeal of any Part of the nth and 1 2th of
Wil. III. 94
Of the unintended Effects of repealing a Part of the
1 1 th and i -j.th of Wil. III. g^
Experimental Effe^i of the 3^ Geo. I, ^6
Of the Decifions of our Courts upon the nth and
nth of Wil. in. ' 98
Of the Inrolment of Deeds hy a Judge's Fiatj 105
Of the Inrolment of Willst no
IIow the Right of Adyniniflration probably came
to the Ordinary, 1 14
'The Spiritual Courts had not the original Cognizance
cf Wills, 116
Lands were formerly devijeable, 120
The Norman Feudal Syfleni incompatible 'With the
Power of devifing Lands y 121
Of the different Modes of inrolling Deeds in the
different Courts, 123
The Obje^ions againfi the Notoriety of Deeds and
Wills affe^ing Lands ^ 1 27
Of
[ viil ]
Of the Ahjurdity of entering Devifes cf Land in a
Court which has no Cognizance of them. Page 1 29
Draught of a Bill for requiiing the Inrolment of
all Deeds, ^c. ^c 1 34,
Qhfcrvations upon the Draught of the Bill, 17^
I M P A R-
IMPARTIAL THOUGHTS, &c.
lntrodu5lory Confiderations.
MOST perfons are in the habit of allowing
merit, and even of giving praife to every
a(5l, which proceeds from the legiflative wifdom of
the Britifh parliament. Yet if we refle6t coolly
and deliberately upon the circiimftances, under
which a6ts of parliament are ofcen paffed, we fhall
find, from the motives, reafons, and occafions of
bringing in the bill, the perfons or party, by whom
the bufinefs is managed and conduced, and the
means, by which it is carried through the houfes,
that the real good of the country was not the prin-
ciple, upon which the bill was grounded, and con-
fequently, that the welfare of the country is not the
confequence of its having pafled into a law. It
will be needlefs to adduce inftances of this truth ;
fince every perfon, who will beftow even a pafTing
thought upon the fubjeft, muft call to his recoi-
leftion many occurrences, to which it mofh forcibly
applies. The perfonal wifh of the Sovereign, the
private views of a minifter, the intereft of a party,
the concealed arts of interefted individuals, the in-
con fiderable impetuofity of the propofers, the igno-
rance of the managers, the inexperience of the
draftfmen, and the inattention of the members to
what may not perfonally intereft them, are the
B various
[ i 3
various caufes of aiTts of parliament being amended,
explained and repealed.
It is in fa(ft impofilble, that any human intuition
can be fo perfeftly comprehenfive, as to forclee and
prevent many confequences of a law, which it was
the intention and expectation of the legidators to
have obviated in paffing it. To fome Ipeculative
minds, this may be a humiliating confideration j
but it muft convince every one^ that upon any at-
tempt to alter the lav/, it becomes highly advifeabic
to take every previous ftep to confult with and in-
form thofe perfons in particular of the fubjeft,
who are competent to judge of, or who may be
interefted in or affefted by the alteration. When
this necefiary precaution has been attended to, and
the plan has been previouily approved of, no re-
fponfibility can lie with thofe, under whofe imnrie-
diate fandlion the propofal is brought forward and
carried into execution.
Reajcns for this Fnhlicatlm.
In the courfe of praftice as a conveyancer, I
have met with fcveral inftances, in which great
advantages have been produced from a regular in-
rolment of deeds and wills affediing lands j and
in which, very great inconveniences and important
lofTes have been incurred and fuffered from the
r«?^i/^/'_y of deeds and wills in certain counties, ac-
cording to feveral ads of parliament now in force.
Upon turning the fubjeft repeatedly in my mind,
I became decifively convinced of the expediency,
and even necelTity, of inrolling all deeds and wills
affefting lands throughout England and Wales.
With a view fairly to commit this expediency and
necefiity to the judgment of the public, I have
ventured to commit my thoughts upoii it to the
prefs.
[ 3 ]
To provoke invefligation and enquiry, is a de-
monftration of the intention to lead to truth.
Apology,
To the gentlemen of nny profeffion, I muH- apo-
logize for deviating in the courfe of my reafoning
from that technical formality and precifion, with
which legal fubjeils are ufually treated. My wifh
is to adapt my reafoning to non-profefTional minds,
and make them as m.uch mafters of the aibjcct,
upon which they are now railed upon to judge, as
if they had devoted much of their time to the fludy
of the law. I have alfo for thcfe reafons been fo
particular and full in my quotations, as generally
to fave my readers the trouble of reforting to the
books, from which I, ha-^^e taken them.
General Ideas of our Lazv.
Semper eadem is the refpedtable and wife device
of our jurifprudence, which, as Lord Bacon fays(^),
€ver favours the law of nature -y and tNat ilands
upon no other bafis. But it is not from the tem-
porary variations and fuperficial appearances, that
we are to judge of this famene^s; it is the funda-
mental principle, to which we are to look up In,
the fuccefllon of ages, the variation of manners
and cuftoms, the diverfity of languages, the variety
of characters, in the monarchy of Solomon, the re-
public of Rome, and the government of Great Bri-
tain, from Lapland to the Brafils, owtjame prin-
ciple of nature a(5tuates the whole. So from the
code of Alfred, to the prefent complicated m.afs
of ftatutes and precedents m law and equity, through
all the various forms and changes of our govern-
^d) Bacon's argument in the Exchequer Chamber on Calr
via's cafe.
B 2 menc.
t 4 1
ftient, the fame principles, upon which the law was
founded in its primitive fimplicity, will be found
to fupport and uphold it in all its extent of multi-
farious modifications j as the fame fource of juices
caufes the acorn to fplit, and feeds the luxuriant
oak. I do not term that an innovation of the law,
which is interwoven with its firfl principles : it
often becomes requifite, that particular laws fhould
be newly modelled and adapted to the exigencies
of the prefent manners, timies, and ciicumftances*
Upon this principle was it, that Mr. Locke, (a) in
the 79th article of his Carolina laws, enafted,
" that to avoid a multiplicity of laws, which by
" degrees always change the right foundations of
** the original government, all a6ls of parliament
" whatfoever Ihall at the end of one hundred
** years after their enafting, refpeftively ceafe and
*' determine of themfelves without any repeal."
For as, during the courfe of a century, many
changes will neceffarily take place in the cuftoms,
manners, and habits of the nation -, (o fhould the
laws alfo change with them : but as the former
changes cannot be produced, but upon one inva-
riable principle of nature, fo ought not the latter
to be varied nor nev.^ly modelled, but upon the
original principles of the law.
The law of nature is the general ground-work of
every municipal law ; and the exigencies of civil
fociety have founded fome general principles com-
mon to all communities : yet, from the locality,
temperature, and other peculiarities of certain fo-
cieties, thefe principles have branched out into a
great diverfity of laws. I jQiall pafs over the ori-
ginal rights acquired by occupancy, or claims efta-
blifhed in the law of nature ; and take up our con-
fiderations from the cultivated ftate of fociety, when
(«) Locke's Works, Vol. III. p. 674.
this
[ 5 ]
this ifland, or at lead the fouthern part of it, was
eftablilhed in a regular and certain order of govern-
ment.
Re of on s of Policy.
The geographical fitnation of this ifland, has
adapted it peculiarly to all the purpofes of trade
and cominerce : and it is eflentially important to
die welfare and flourifliing ftate of trade and com-
merce, that the landed property of the country
fliould be eftablifhed and kept upon fuch a foot-
ing, as to render it ferviceable and ufeful for all
mercantile purpofes. Thus land, to become ufeful
to commerce, muft be marketable and negociable ;
and to be fo, muft be invariably clear and evident
in its title.
Of the ancient 'tenure? of Land.
The prcfent modern tenures of lands in England
and Wales, have infenfibly formed themfelves
into fome reafonable and confiftent principle, upon
the gradual decline, and at length the total aboli-
tion of the feudal fyftem. It is curious to obferve,
that every afFeftion of the land, even under th®
prefent tenures, is only accountable for upon fomc
feudal principle. To anfwer my intended purpofe,
we will throw back our ideas to the year 800, at
which time. Sir Henrv Spelman fays, the feudal
fyftem was the law of nations in our weftern world ;
for although in the time of our Saxon anceftors,
the feudal law had footing in this ifland, as well as
in other parts of Europe, yet it was not attended
with all the rigor and forms, which '•vere afterwards
imported and introduced into it by ?he Normans.
The opprelTive multiplicity of tenures and other
feudal confequences, which were never completely
aboliflied till the days of King Charles the Second,
Vvtre abulive emanations of an original principle
B 3 of
[ 6 ]
of fimplicity and liberty, to which if we rfcur, and
upon it revive, or even introduce an ufage conge-
nial with the prefent times, manners, and circum-
ftances, a Ihadow of imputation cannot lie againft
us of attempting to alter the law or infringe the
conftitution.
^he free Power of aliening Land in a commercial
Country.
The experience of many centuries has mofl in-
controvertibly proved, that the free power of alien-
ing land, v>'ith certain modifications and reftric-
tions, is efientially requifite in a commercial coun-
try ; and in diis power of alienation, is moft clofely
interwoven the neceflary notoriety of the land-
owner's title. Lord Mansfield, in a learned and
elaborate argument upon the nature of a dilfeifin,
in 'Taylor v. Horde (a)y fays, that " the different fta-
" tutes, which had given free liberty of alienation,
" and abolillied all military tenures, had left us little
'^ but the names of feoffment, feifm, tcnui-e, and
'^ freeholder, without any precife knowledge of the
" thing originally fignified by thefe founds. Co-
'*" pyholds, and the cuftomary freeholds in the
" North, retain faint traces, in imitation of the old
" fyftem of feudal tenures. It is obvious, how a
" man may vifibly be the copyholder or cuftomary
" freeholder de fa^o, in prejudice of the rightful
** tenant ; and it then was as notorious, who was
" the feudal tenant de fa^lo, as who now is de fa5io
" incumbent of a living or mayor of a corpora-
" tion."
{a) I Burr. p. io8.
Notoriety
[ 7 ]
Notoriety of the fir ft A^s of Alienatwi of Land.
When this free power of alienation had once
gained footing, the moft folemn notoriety attended
every aft of alienation : the firft mode of transfer-
ring landed property was, in the unlettered days of
our warlike anceftors, by the corporal tradition and
ihveftiture in poflelTion of the aliened lands ; and
this w^ done with the utmoft folemnity, coram pa-
ribus de vicineto ; or it was rendered public and no-
torious by fome other fymbolical gift or tradition :
{a) " At firft many lands and eftates were collated or
" beftowed by bare word of mouth, without writing
" or charter, only with the lord's Avord or helmet, or
" a horn or a cup; and very many times with a fpur>
" with a currycomb, with a bow, and fome with an
" arrow: but thefe things were in the beginning of
"^ the Norman reign : in after times this falhion was
^^ altered." But as in procefs of time, great in-
conveniences were experienced from the evidence
of titles refting folely upon the perfonal memory
of the wltneffes to fuch a6ts of alienation, written
conveyances were Introduced; the firft form of
which vvas the deed of feoffment : and although the
words of the deed, which in fa6t was a tranfaftion
only between the grantor and grantee, contained
the nature of the transfer, and the duration of the
eftate intended to be thereby given ; yet the feoff-
ment, or rather the transfer or alienation, was not
perfefted till the livery of feifin^ which was made
coram 'paribus dc vicineto^ who indorfed upon the
back of the deed of feoffm.ent their atteftation as to
the manner, place, and time of fuch livery. Nam
feudumftne inveftiturd mdlo modo conftitui poteft {li) ;
(rt) Selden's Janus Anglorum, c. 3. p. 54,
\b) Wright 37.
B 4 nor
[ 8 1
nor was the transfer or alienation complete, till, as
Fleta (a) lays, ft juris et Je'ifin<£ conjun5iio.
So fays Mr. Juftice Blackftone : (^) " Livery
" of feifin, by the common law, is necefTary to be
" made upon every grant of an eftate of freehold
" in hereditaments corporeal, whether of inheri-
" tance or for life only : and in leafes for years, an
" adlual entry is necefTary to veft the eftate in the
" leflee ; for the bare leafe gives him only a right
" to enter, which is called his intereft in the term,
or interejj'e termini ; and when he enters in pur-
fuance of that right, he is then, and not before,
in poflefllon of his term, and complete tenant
for years. This entry by the tenant himfelf
ferved the purpofe of notoriety, as well as livery
" of feifin from the grantor could have done. Thus
" is it obfervable, how upon the old principles
" the modern rules of law are grounded ; for, even
" to this day, you cannot grant a freehold to com-
*' mence in future : the reafon is, that at common
*' law fuch a grant could not be made without li-
" very of feifin j and this livery being an adual
" tradition of the land, muft take efFcft in prefenti,
" or not at all."
It is obvious, that there can be no livery of
feifin of incorporeal hereditaments, or of fuch things
as, by lawyers, are faid to lie in grant ; as advow-
fons, commons, rents, feignories, reverfions, Sec:
Res incorporates y quajunt ifjumjus rei, vel corporiin-
hccrens traditionem non patiuntur. (c) Therefore, as
Mr. Juftice Blackftone further obferves, " Thefe
" things pafied merely by the delivery of the
" deed ; but then fuch grant, together with the
" attornment of the tenant, were held to be of
(^) Fleta 2. 1. 3. c. 15. § 5.
(S) Blackft. Com. vol. 2. p. 314.
(c) Bradlon, 1. 2. c. 18.
^^ equal
[ 9 J
*' equal notoriety with, and therefore equivalent to
" a ffofFment and livery of lands in immediate
" pofleffion (a):'
As early then, as landed property could be
transferred or aliened by deed, we trace this firft
eflential principle; that the utmoft notoriety always
attended the a6l of alienation. And although in
procefs of time, either by the arts or inattention of
conveyancers, modes have been devifed and efta-
blifhed of pafTing lands in a very fecret manner,
yet it certainly never could have been the intention
nor fpirit of that law, which, as we have feen, re-
quired fuch determined notoriety in every a6t of
alienation of land. This want of notoriety has fre-
quently been a fubjeft of difcuITion, both to law-
yers and ftatefmen : and it is therefore no lefs
aftonifl-iing than true, that the fubjeft has never
been thoroughly inveftigated, and confequently
neither faithfully reprefented nor properly under-
ftood. The further enquiry into it at prcfent
fliall be introduced in Mr. Juftice Blackftone's
words (^).
" In the ancient feudal method of conveyance,
** (by giving corporeal feifinof the lands) this no-
" toriety was in fome meafure anfwered ; but all
" the advantages refulting from thence are now
" totally defeated by the introduction of death-bed
" devifes and fecret conveyances ; and there has
" never yet been any fufficient guard againfl frau-
** dulent charges and incumbrances : fince the dif-
" ufe of the old Saxon cuftom of tranfadling all
" conveyances at the countv court, and entering a
" memorial of them in the chartulary or leger
*' book of fome adjacent monaftery, and the failure
" of the general regifter eftablifhcd by King
(a) Blackn. 2 V. c. 20. p. 317.
(^) Elacklt. 2 vol. c. 20. p. 343.
" Richard
[ lo ]
<' Richard the firft, for the flarrs (a) or mortgages
** made to Jews, in the Capituld de Judeis, (}) of
*^ which Hoveden has prefer ved a copy. How fir
" the eilablifiiment of a like general regifcer for
" deeds and wills, and other afts affefting real
" property, would remedy this inconvenience, de-
" ferves well to be confidered. In Scotland, every
" ad. regarding the tranfmiflion of property is re-
" gularly entered on record ; and feme of our own
" provincial divifions, particularly the extended
" county of York and the populous county of
" Middlcfex, have prevailed with the legiflature to
" ere6t fuch regifters in their refpe6live diftri6ls."
In Ireland alfo, all deeds affefting- lands are re-
giRered, by which notoriety of the incumbrances,
many important obje6lions againft lending money
upon mortgage in that kingdom, are done away.
From very frequent enquiries into the nature and
confequences of inrolling deeds in Scotland, and
(a) The Hebrew word Jhetar fignifies a deed or contrail : if
th'jrefore the firll fylhible be abbreviated, or rather if the
whole word be contraiftcd into one iyilable, we (ball have the
found, by Vv'hich a modern Northern Jew would pronounce the
word Jiar. Hence it is more p'obable, that the Star Chanj-
fccr was fo called, than from its ftafry cieling.
{h) It would be ill judged indeed to draw a line of parity
between the reafons for inrolling deeds and wills in the prefent
age, and thofe, which induced government in the i nh century
to pafs thefe laws relating to the Jews : when vvc reflect, that
thev were pafTcd in an age, when either the Jews would, or
Chriftians could otherwife believe, that they would yearly, on
Good Friday, crucify a child of Chnftian parents, in derifion
of the crucifixion of our bleffed Redeemer. (Molloy, 1. 3.)
However, upon the general principle of avoiding cavilling and
differences between adverfe parties, " every Jew was made to
f* fwear upon his roll, that all his debts, and pawns and rents,
*' and all his goods and pofl'efTions he fhould caufe to be in-
*' rolled, and that he fhould conceal nothing," &c. &c. It
is a vulgar ax'iom, *' believe every man honclt, but deal with
him, as if he were otherwife :" many hold this good as to indi-
viduals, but all mud think it holds good as to Icgiflative bodies.
regiftcring
[ " ]
rcgiftcring them in Ireland, I have not found, that
in any one inftance, any realbnable complaint had
ever been made either againfl: the ufage or the ef-
fedls : on the contrary, I have obferved much good
thereby produced and felt ().
In fupport of thefe ideas, it is very fatisfa6lory
to find, they are not new : in the preface to Baron
Gilbert's learned Treatife of Tenures, it is faid,
" He has clearly explained the rcafon of thofe pub-
*' lie ceremonies and afts of notoriety, required
" by the feudal lav.', for the acquiring, poffefllng,
" and transferring of feuds, and which formerly
*' were equally requifite in our common law te-
" nures, viz. liveries, attornn.ents, &c. ; the difufe
" whereof has not only occafioned an uncertainty
" in many titles and cftates, but alfo introduced
" that mifchievous practice of private and fecret
" feoffments, by kafe and releafe, covenants to
" ufes, &c. and- which, in confequence, has intro-
" duced a deluge of perjuries, forgeries, and other
" corruptions over the common law, and which
" can never be reftificd, or the mifchief redreffed,
" till the commion law be, in that particular, ref-
" tored to thr anciv^nt method of paffing eftates in
*' pais, or by fome public a6c of notoriety."
Popula" Prejudices not to he dijregarded.
I do not think, that popular prejudices are al-
ways juftly grounded, and reafonably entertained j
but they fcldom fubfiit without fome reafon, that
is ad captmn vul^ij and within the ready apprehen-
{a) There has always appeared to me much more order
reaibn and judgment, in all legal tranfadions in Scotland, than
in Ireland: nor, in my opinion, can there be a more marked
inftance of that fuperiority, than in the inrolment, inllead of
tlie regillry of deeds. I fliall ipeak more fully hereafter of the
very ellential defeats and milchiefs of the mutilated memorials
of regiftered deeds in this kingdom.
fion
[ .2 ]
fion of the community. Thus it is well known,
that in the purchafe of landed eftates, and much
more in the negociations for the loan of money
upon miOrtgage, or by way of annuity or rent charge,
a decided preference is generally given to lecuri-
ties in the regiftering counties over thofe, in which
no regiftry is eftablifhed : and for what reafon ?
but becaufe generally there is more confidence
between the buyer and feller, and the lender and
borrower, when the lands lie in a regiftering coun-
ty, than when they lie in other places; and the
lands are there found to be more marketable and
negociable. And what can fo efFeftually raife the
price and value of them, as this defirable quality ?
What can fo materially promote the trade of a
country, as the eafe and fecurity, with which the
merchant may inveft his gains in the purchafe of
real property or land ? What can fo effcntially raife
the value of land to the owner, as the facility, with
which he can render it fubfervient to every purpofe
of providing for his family, relieving his diilrefies,
or even gratifying his pleafures and inclinations ?
Thefe again are no new ideas: A fmall pamphlet
publillied in the year 1696, intituled, A Propcfal
for the ereufir.g County Regifiers for Freehold hands,
JJpewing the great Ufe and Benefit of them, has thefe
words, " It is the cheapnefs and facility of procur-
" ing money, that is the benefit dcfigned to the
*■'■ borrower, as certainty and fecurity is to the
" lender. If we gain thefe two points, the principal
" benefit of land is gained, which is to make them
*' funds for carrying on the trade of the nation, to
*' the public and private benefit." I'he vulgar
prejudice then in favour of the regiftering counties,
is grounded upon thefe pl-aufible reafons ; that
therei^y the value of the land is increafed to the
owner, by its becoming more negociable and mar-
ketable i and titles and fccuriries become there-
by
[ 13 ]
bv more clear and unobjectionable to the monicd
men for inveding their money in purchales or
mortgages. Plaufible as thefe reafons are, we are
now to examine how far they are juft and aftually
cxift.
In the feqiicl of my refearches, I am happy in
moving upon a principle, which evidently is found-
ed in the ancient laws of this country ; and that
much experience may be called in to the aid of my
argument, not only from our filler kingdoms, but
alio, in a very great meafure, from our own. We
have feen, that the firft method of conveying land
by a written deed, v/as done with the greatelt pub-
licity and notoriety ; and therefore, after fuch a
conveyance, there was not fuppofed to remain any
fecret title or fupprelTed right in any other. The
perfon, to whom fuch conveyance v^as thus public-
ly and notorioully made, was fuppofed to acquire
thereby fuch a right, as he could maintain againil
all men (a). " By the ancient feudal law, no
man could alien without a licence from the lord
of the fee, and this licence was part of the no-
toriety on fuch alienations. And if they alie-
nated v/ithout fuch licence, the feud was for-
feited. Nor could the lords part with their ma-
nors and fervices without the attornment of
their tenants, &c." But we are now gone by
the time, when, as Lord Bacon fays (^), " all
' inheritances could not pafs, but by a6ls overt and
^ notorious, as by deeds livery and records." And
it mufi: be the convi6lion of every perfon, who
turns a thought to the fubje6l, that as the occafions
of charging and felling lands are become now more
frequent, than they have heretofore been, it is be-
come now therefore more rcquifite than ever, I
().
Reafons of Jome Deeds not being inrolled.
Another mode of conveyance fprung out of this
wily doftrine of uf^s, which, becaufe the confider-
ation of fjch deed neceffarily was marriage or
confanguinity, it was not perhaps thought by the
legidature open to fuch fraud nor deceit; and as it
did not pafs the land out of the owner's family, it
might not require the fame degree of notoriety and
(rt) Ufe of the Law, p. 150.
{[)) The particular cuitoms of inrolling deeds in fome towns
and corporationp, may fairly be prefumcd to have been adopted
and ellabliflicd, upon the idea of a more frequent circulation
of property in the place where the cuilom prevailed ; or that it
was a rtrK!:l of an univerfal ufage throughout the nation, retain-
ed in particular places : both which reafons llrongly enforce
the neceflity of an univerfal inrolment.
publication j
[ 17 ]
publication ; and therefore fuch a deed, which Is
called a covenant to jland J'eijcd to iifesy needs not to
be inrolled. Lord Bacon {a) ipeaks of it, as fol-
lows. " A man that hath a wife and children, being
" king'sfolks, may by writing under his hand
" and feal agree, that for their or any of their
*' preferment he will (land feifed of his lands to
" their ufes, either in tail or fee, {o as he fhall {ito.
*' caufe : upon which agreement in writing, there
" arifedi an equity or honcfty, that the lands jfhould
** go according to thofe agreements ; nature and
*^ reafon allowing thefe provifions, of which equi-
" ty and honefty is the ufe, and the ufe being cre-
" ated in this fort, the ftatute of 27 H. VIII.
*' before mentioned conveyech the eftate of the
'•^ land {b), as the ufe is appointed. And fo this
** covenant to ftand feifed to ufes is at this day,
*' fince the faid ftatute, a conveyance of land; and
" with this difference from a bargain and fale, in that
" this needeth no inrolment, as a bargain and fale
" doth, nor needeth not to be in writing indented,
*' as a bargain and fale muft : and if the party,
** to whofe ufe he ao-reeth to ftand feifed of the
" land, be not wife or child, coufin, or one, that he
" meaneth to marry, then will no ufe rife, and fo
" no conveyance."
Without departing from the time, of which Lord
Bacon fpeaks, all other affurances of land then in
ufage were, as the fame ftill are, made by matter of
record; and confequently with that fpecies of no-
toriety, which I am endeavouring to fhew, ought
to attend every deed and will affed:ing land.
Mr. Juftice Blackilone fays (^), " Affurances
(fl) Bac. ubi fupra, p. 151.
{b) i. e. by coupling the ufe witli the poireffion, or transfer-
ring the ufe into poiTeHion,
(.) Black. Com. Vol.11. 1.2. c. 21.
C " by
[ 18 ]
^^ by matter of rpcord call in the fanftlon of a
" court of record to fubfta, riatc, pr. ftrve, .md be
" a perpetual teftimonv of tae transferring of pro-
" perty from one mm lo another, or of its eilablifh-
^*' ment when already transferred. Of this nature
*' are, i% Private ads of parliament; 2% The
" king's grants ; 3% Fires ; 4^", Common reco-
" veries." It would exceed the intention of m.y
defign, to explain the nature of thefe four modes of
affe(5ting landed property : fuffice it to fay, what
every one knows, that they are methods, by which
a title to land may be acquired, or by which the
land muiy be afFefted ; and that not one of them
can be pra6lifed without the moll folemn and pub-
lic notoriety.
Dedu^fions,
If it be expedient to render public and notorious
the a6l, by which the moil fure and folid title to
land is acquired ; it muil be for fome reafons^
which enforce that expediency : whatever reafons
thefe are, they muft efientially counteraft the pro-
priety or expediency of any title to land being
acquired without fuch notoriety ; for a majore ad
minus valet conjequentia. If the king in perfon,
who is not prefumed to err; if his judges in court,
whofe judgment is mandatory ; if the legiflative
body, whofe authority is uncontroulable, cannot
transfer land, or give title unto it without the fo-
lemnity of publicity, notoriety, and perpetuity, a
fortiori^ individuals, wliofe judgment is always
fallible, whofe integrity is often fufpicious, whofe
artifices are fometimes refined and almoft impe-
netrable, ought not to be permitted to transfer
land or give title unto it, without at Icaft equal
publicity, notoriety, and perpetuity.
When die legiflature in the 27th year of King
Henry
t '9 ]
Henry VIII. enabled, that every bargain and f ale
ef lands jhould he by deed indented and inrolledy
there was no other method or form known or
pradifed of felling or transferring land^ (except
by deed of feoffment with livery and fcifirt). And
indeed this deed of bargain and fale itfdf \^3.s a
novelty introduced into the law, together with or
fpringing out of the doflrine of ufes. And I may
here properly again ixy with Judge Blackftone {^a),
*' It \t. iniprafticable, upon our prefent plan, to pur-
" fue the dodrinc of ufes through all the refine-
" ments and niceties, which the ingenuity of the
" times, CaboLindinr,' in lubtle difquifiiions) deduced
" from this child of the imagination, when once a
*' departure was permitted from the plain fnnple
" rules of property eftabliPned by the ancient law."
As thefe fubtle inventions and innovations had
for centuries been weaving rhemfelves into the tex-
ture of the law, and thus had become, as it were,
of a piece with the law itfelf, it was difficult for
parliament to devife at once a remedy perfe6tly
commenfurate with the mifchief, without perhaps
venturing upon the too hazardous experiment, of
abolifhing the whole fyftcm, with all its mediate
and immediate confequences.
Lands devifeahle.
From the change of laws introduced by the
Normans, to the days of Henry VIII. lands were
not devifeable, which was found by experience to
be inconvenient ; though by fpecial cuflom, as in
London and elfewhere, lands might be given by
wills J and this was a relidl of the Saxon liberties
or laws, by which lands were devifeable. Upon
this doflrine of ufes thenj a perfon wifhing his land
(a) Black. Com. Vol. II. c. 20. p. 33.
C 2 after
[ --0 ]
after liis death to go in a different fuccefllon from
the defcent, which the law would have caft it in,
conveyed during his life his land to a friend in
truft ; and then by his will would declare how
his friend fhould difpofe of it. This declaration
by will raifed an uje^ which gave the benefits and
profits of the land to the perfon intended to be be-
nefited by the will, whilft the land itfelf was le-
gally and really vefted in the perfon, to whom it
had been conveyed, and to whom livery and feifin
had been made ; and he was called the feoffee
in truft. But the ftatute of ufes, which transferred
the ufe into polTefTion, necefTarily defeated this
ihifting evafion of the lav/; for after this ftatute,
the raifing of an ufe in land was giving the real
poirelTion of the land ; and this would have been
to all intents and purpofes a devife of lands, which
ever fince the introduftion, or rather the new mo-
delling of the feudal fyftem by the Normans, had
not been allowed. It was however foon found
expedient to alter the law in this regard ; and by
the 32d of Henry VIII. perfons were enabled to
give and devife lands by will, under certain re-
ftri(5lions.
Here parliament, as in many other inftances,
changing the ancient law or remedying an evil,
was inattentive to one of the moft material confe-
quences of fuch innovation ; which was, to provide;
for the folemnity and notoriety of that a6l, by which
land is given to a ftranger, and the right heir,
whom the law ever favors and proteds, is difinhe-
rited and deprived or defeated of his legal rights,
in a manner certainly more liable to deceit, fraud,
art and undue influence, than any a(5l or deed,
wliich operates and takes its full effe6l, during the
lifetime of tlie iz-rantor or donor. But of this want
of notoriety in wills of land, I ftiuU fpeak more
fully licreafter.
Intro-
[ i. ]
Introdu5lion of fecret Conveyances,
In procefs of time, ilill upon this do6lrine of
iifes, the ingenuity of conveyancers, and particu-
larly of Sir Orlando Bridgman, before who^n more
than two thirds of the titles in the kingdom, after
the civil wars, had been laid or fubmitted^ intro-
duced a new mode of conveyance, to which (for
reafons never publiclv given, for they would not
ftand the ted of public inveftigarion and judgment)
they gave the full effedls or feoffmeni: with livery
and feifin, or bargain and fale inrolled; but with-
out the notoriety either of the one or of the ether.
This was a conveyance by leaje and releaje^ which
is now become the moft common conveyance of
lands. For in the dodrine of ufcs, r. very frrange
and unaccountable rule of law had prevailed and
been eftabliflied, viz. that no iije could be limited on
an uje; (a) by which it was underllood, that, if A.
for money bargained and fold his land to B. it
raifed an ufe in the land to B. which ufe being
transferred into pofleflion by the flatute of ules,
no further limitation could be engrafted upon it.
Now it often happens, tha: there is occafion to li-
mit lands to A. and his heirs, to the ufe of feveral
different perfons in remainder, and for different
eftates J to fome for life, to others in tail, either male
or female ; and to another in fee, as h uf jf.lly the
cafe in marriage-fettlements. For cs^cr^^iple, the
owner of the land generally conveys it by Icafe and
releafe to two truflees, (who are called the releafees
to ufes and truftees of the inheritance to prefcrve
the contingent remainders, &c.) to the ufe of him-
felf for life, then to the ufe of the truftees to pre-^
ferve the contingent remainders from being de-
feated;, but to hold it in truft for the tenant for
{a) Over 155.
P 3 ^^^>
[ 22 ] '
life ; then to the iife and intent of providing a
jointure for the intended wife, or to her for life in
like manner as to himfelf ; then to the ufe of other
truftees for a term of years, for the purpofes of
better fecuring the jointure and providing portions
and maintenances for the younger children j then
to the illue of the m.arriage in tail, with perhaps
feveral voluntary remainders to relations or friends ;
and trie ultimate remainder to the fettlef in fee-
fimple.
All thefe different limitations could not be made
by a bargain and fale inrolled, hecauje an ufe
xannot he limited upon an ufe. So from this doc-
trine of ufes, various innovations have at different
times been introduced into the practice of convey-
ancing : but aS the principles, upon which th. le in-
novations were grounded, were heterogeneous from
thole of the ancient law -, fo no wonder, that the
introduflors of them lofb fight of the leading fea-
tures of the old law, which were notoriety and
perpetuity, as we have feen in feoffments with
livery and feifin, and bargains and fales inrolled.
It would exceed the extent of my plan, and be ir-
relevant to the fubjeft under confideration, to en-
ter m.ore fully into the nature, operation, and ef-
fe6ts of a conveyance by leafe and releafe : fuffice
it to have faid, that by the general law of this
country, they need not now be inrolled, no more
than wills or any other private conveyances of
land, (except bargains and fales for a pecuniary
confideration.)
Further Proofs of the ancient Notoriety of all Deeds
affecting hands.
Copyhold eftatcs arc nothing more nor lefs, than
certain cuftoms or ufages, which, though formerly
general and comnrion to other lands^ have by par-
ticular
[ 23 3
ticular privilege, grant, oi < vcn chance, been re-
tamed and preferved in different manors, after the
geraral tenure of lands throughout the kingdom
was altered and chanfj;ed. Although many of thefe
cuftoms vary in different manors, yet there is one
principal iifage, vvhich is, I believe, univerfally and
unexceptionably common to every manor, in which
any copyhold culloms or ufages are preferved. And
this is, that no copyholder (or tenant holding by
copy of court roll) lliall or mav pafs away, change,
alter, or affe6l his land, without making this deed
or aft in fome fhipe notorious in the manor court.
Nothing fo ftroni^ly proves an ancient ufage, as
the prefervation of it' in particular fubordinate ju-
rifdiftions : and there is no method fo fure of prov-
ing the exiftence of a law or ufage, as to fhew
that parliament has taken its benefits or abufes into
condderation. So early then as in the year 1384 (a)
" at the complaint of the faid commonalty made
**■ to the lord the king in the parliament, for that
" great difherifon" (^x^^ rd'^/^^/zo, or lofs of the right
heir's title) " in times pad was done (or happen-
" ed) to the people, and m.ay be done, by the falfe
*' entering bf pleas, rafmg of rolls, and changing of
" verdifls, &c. it is accorded and affented, that if
" any judge or clerk be of fuch default, fo that
*' by the fame default there enfueth difinherifon of
'' any of the parties, &rc. &c. he fhail be pii-
" nifhed by fine and ranfom at the king's will
" and fatisfy the party." Can any thing more
conclufively evince, that in thofe days the deeds
and muniments to men's eftates were inrolled and
recorded, that is, rendered public, notorious, and
perpetual ? I now hooe I have faid enough to
prove, that the requifition of notoriety and perpe-
tuity to every aft, by which land is affected, is
(«) 8 Ric. 2. c. 4.
C 4 congenial
[ 24 ]
congenial with the principles of the ancient law,
and ther 'fore that it ought to be univerfally efta-
bliflied throughout the kingdonn.
// is more necejfary in the prefent^ than in any pajl
Age, to render every A5f, by zvhich Land is affected,
public i notorious^ and perpetual.
In the reign of Queen Elizabeth, a motion was
made in the houfe of commons for leave to bring
in a bill to prohibit ufuryj by which nothing
more in thofe days was meant, than placing out
money at intereft : for it is fince the regulating of
the rate of intereft, that the word ujury has been
appropriated to every illegal excefs of that rate.
A great llatefman then in the houfe oppofed it,
and concluded his argument for the continuance
of it, with this memorable aphorifm : Let any
man jhew me a country without uJury, and I will
fljew him one without trade or riches : than the
truth of which, nothing is more clear nor certain.
As th'^n the facility of borrowing money upon
reafonable intereft, is elTential to the trade and
commerce of a country ; fo it follows, that the
more certain and fatisfaftory the fecurity is, upon
whic!i the money borrowed is placed out, the
more conducive is it to the lending and borrowing i
and by how much more ufeful and fubfervient to
thefc ends the land is rendered, by fo much will
its value and price be raifed ; and there needs no
argument to prove, that by the value and price of
land, the national funds mufb rife and fall ; and
tii^iv flu6tuation is the true and juft barometer of
the credit and profperii.y of the nation. It necefTa-
rily follows, didi whatever raifes the value anc^
price of land, muft alfo incrcaf- the price of ftock,
and confequrntly tend to pre note the credit and
profperity of die kingdoin. Upon the fame prin-
ciple
[ 2S ]
ciple will it appear, that in proportion to the dif-
ficulties of raifing money, nnuft the circulation of
property be checked; and the free circulation of
property is evidently effential to the flouriilnng
Hate of a commercial country. A title to land be-
comes more complicated, abftrufe, and difficult,
in proportion to the number, variety, and intri-
cacy of deeds, through wr'rh it is deduced. If
that notoriety, which was required by the ancient
law, had attended every transfer of landed proper-
ty, much intricacy and uncertainty in titles would
have been avoided : but we mud argue, as well
as judge from fadls. The free power of aliena-
tion, the flourifliing (late of trade, the increafe of
wealth in ciiculation, the accumulation of ftatutes,
judgments, and decrees refpefting the rights and
titles of land-owners, the ignorance of many, who
undertake to praftife as conveyancers, the refine-
ment of fome, and the diffufe prolixity of almoft
all pradlitioners, mult ever tend to increafe the
intricacy and uncertainty of the land-owner's title
to his eftates. Now upon the admiffion of the
principle, that the circulation of property muft
ever be in proportion to the extent of trade, we
muft infer, that as the trade of this country never
was fo extenfive, as in the prefent hour, and confe-
quently luxury and refinement (from which it will
be difficult to abftra) Cowper's Rep. 712 and PovveJi upon the Law of Mort-
gage , 287.
which
[ 42 ]
v/nich would be abfurd in the extreme, if a man
fearched the regiP.cry at his own peril : for it is evi-
dently more advantageous to a purchafer or mort-
gagee to complete his purchafe or mortgage ixjith-
mt notice, than ivith notice of a prior incum-
brance.
In my prefent purfuitj it is not only my duty ta
ftate, what the law of riotice now is, but more efpe-
cially what under the propofed aft of parliament
it ought to be. And I am happy in being able
to confirm the doflrine of Lord Hardwicke, in
Hine and Dodd^ by the more minute and exprefs
opinion of the famed D'Agueffeau, chancellor of
France. (^) By laws of that kingdom, as ancient
as the fixteenth century, particularly an ordonnance
of Henry the Second, of the year 1553, it was or-
dered that all wills and deeds, containing fubfli-
tiitions of ellates, fhould be regiftered within a
particular period of time. If they were not re-
giftered v.'ithin that time, the courts feem to have
doubted whether they were binding even on the
parties, in whofe favour the fubftitutions were
made; but it was ahvays fettled, that the fubftitu-
tions were of no force againft creditors or purcha-
fers. Several points of the laws refpefting fubfti-
tutions being unfettled, and the laws refpecting
them being different in different parts of the king-
dom, they were all reduced into one law by the ce-
lebrated ordonnance of Auguft 1747. That or-
«lonnance was framed by the chancellor D'Aguef-
feau, after taking the fentiments of every parlia-
ment in the kingdom upon forty-five different
queftions propofed to them upon the fubject. The
thirty-ninth queftion is, " Whether a creditor or
*' purchafer, having notice of the fubftitution be-
" fore his contrail or purchafe, is to be admitted
(g) Harg. and Butler's Co. Lit. 291.
«tQ
\
I 43 ]
^f to plead the want of regiilration ?" All the par-
liaments, except the parliament of Flanders, agreed
that he was; that to admit the contrary dod:rinc
would make it always open to argument, whether
he had or had not notice of the fubftitution ; and
this would lead to endlefs ui^certainiy, confufion,
and perjury ; and that it was much better, that the
right of the fubjefl fhould depend upon certain
and fixed principles of law, than upon rules and
conllruclions of equity, which muft be arbitrary,
and confequendy uncertain. The ordonnance of
Augull 17.^7 was framed accordingly. Thofe,
who have commented, upon that ordonnance, lay
It down as a fixed and undeniable principle, that
nothing, not even the moft aftual and direft no-
tice, countervails the want of regiftration ; fo that
if a perfon is a witnefs, or even a party to the
deed of fubftitution, ftill if it is not regiftered he
may fafely purchafe the property fubftituted, or
lend money upon a mortgage of it. See queflions
concernant les Subflitutions, Thouloufe 1770, and
Commentaire de I'Ordonnance de L-ouis XV. Sur
Jes Subftitutions, par Mr. Furgole, a Paris, 1767.,
FroMical Applications.
Let us now, abftraftedly from any prejudice of
education, habit or profeflion, argue upon this
matter in the di6lates of plain common fenfe. A
man wifhes to purchafe or place out a fum of
money upon mortgage, or to buy a rent-charge
or annuity, iffuing out of land. A title is pro-
pofed to him ; he kibmits it to his law agent, who
probably carries it to a conveyancing council ; he
perufes and approves of the title, as fubmitted to
him in the abftraft ; but directs the follicitor, who
brought him the abftrad, to examine if the grant
^x fine or recovery^ or ail of ■parliament^ upon which
the
[ 44 ]
the title may hingC;, be faithfully abilrafted from
the record. This is the duty of a conveyancer ;
for he ran only judge of v/hat he fees, and diredt
what may be effected. Tjbe client with the appro-
bation of council confides in the fecurity, and pre-
fumes himfelf out of the reach of any impofition
in the tranfa£lion, and will naturally conclude;, not
only, that every fbep has been taken^ that can fe-
cure the title, but that no means nor power are
left with the vendor or mortgagor or grantor of the
annuity or rent-charge of overreaching or de-
ceivins: him in the title. And will he not more-
over naturally conclude, if there be any repofitory
of information to rcfort to concerning a man's
title to land, that if it be not a fource of fatisfadlory
and conclufive intelligence, it muft lead to deceit
and ei-ror, by infuring doubt and uncertainty ?
What then is the fafl ? A vendor or mortgagor
may notwithftanding all, that has appeared to coun-
fel upon the face of the abilraft, and all the in-
tellio-ence and information, which the moft dili-
gent and attentive follicitor can by poffibility ac-
quire, have previouHy fold, mortgaged, charged,,
or fettled the whole or any parts of the land iri
queftion, without an obligation of rendering no-
torious any one aft, by which he may have made
fuch fale, mortgage, charge or fettlement. Whence
then arifes ^\^ necelTity, or even expediency, of
making public and notorious fome aftsj v*^hich
affect the title of lands, whilft the owner is em-
powered to fupprefs many others, by which he caii
equally afFeft them? He cannot cut off the ex-
pedlant rights of a chiki or a remainder- man in
an entailed cftate, but by matter of notoriety and
record : and is there not as much or more reafon,
■why that a6l fliould be public and notorious, by
which a tenant in fee-fimple counterads and de-
feats tlic known, fettled and certain coui-fe of thQ
[ 45 1
law, Vv'hich would have caft the inheritance upon
the lieir at law, if he had not counteracled and de-
h
the
^eated its effects ; and this he has it in his power
to do by a private deed in his lifetime, or by will
after his deceafe; neither of which needs to be ren-
dered public or notorious. He may by a private
deed charge all his lands with a debt j but by con-
feffing a judgment, which equally charges them, it
muft be by matter of record and notoriety.
I may be blamed and cenfured by fome, for
divulging the arcana of the profeflion, and uttering
truths, which may be thought to difturb the peace
and quiet of many, whofe money is now placed
out upon landed fecurities ; but I can neither in-
vent nor conceive a ftronger reafon, why the law
fhould be altered, than becaufe the knowledge of
it difturbs the peace and endangers the fecurity of
individuals, it is then a truth no lefs certain than
extraordinary, that in palling many titles of land,
it is abfoluteiy ncceffary, that very great reliance
and elTential confidence fhould be placed in the
perfonai honour and integrity of individuals, againft
whofe deceit, fraud and impofidon, fhould they
not be honeft and honourable, there are abfoluteiy
no means of providing. To prove this, I will
ftate a cafe that has very lately happened, v/hicli
as to many points applies ftriftly to my argument.
I have met with feveral other cafes within my own
knowledge, which turn upon the fam.e point. But
fliould even the cafe I put, be merely fuppofitious,
from the probability of its frequently happening,
it woujd equally enforce my arguments.
The
t 46 i
^he Cafes of Rkkman againft Morgan [a)^ tind
Pear/on againfi Morgan {h).
Mr. James Butler of Suffex was entitled, un-
der his father's marriage-fettlement, to an cftate
charged with f. 8000 for one younger child
of the marriage; which fettlement contained a
provifo, that if the fadier fhould give to any of
his daughters or younp.r fons any money or lands,
for or in advanceme'iC u) marriage, or otherwife,
the value thereof fnouk! be dedutled from thd
portion, unlefs he fliould by writing declare to the
contrary. The father gave the refidue of his
perfonal eftate to his only younger child Mr. John
Butler, and made other advancements to him dur-
ing his life. The father being dead, Mr. James
Butler fuffered a common recovery, by which he
obtained a fee-fimple in the lands. In iJJSi
Mr. John Butler applied to Mr. Pearfon to lend
him /[. 3C00 on the fecurity of the £. 8000
portion, for which he affigned £. 5000, part
of the faid £. 8oco, as a fecuri:y. Mr. James
Butler, who from the time of his fuffering the
common recovery, held the fee-fimple of the eftate
to his death, paid the intereft of the £. 8000,
Mr. Pearfon, before he lent the money, applied
by his follicitor, Mr. Hull, to Mr. James Butler^,
and deftred to be informed by him, whedier the
£. 8goo was a fubfifting charge on the eftate ;
when Mr. James Butler declared that it was, and
that he might fafely advance his money on the
fecurity. Mr. James Butler had polTeflion of the
fettlcment, and knew of the advancemicnts of the
father to his brother ; but not fuppofing the por-
(a) Brown's Rinorts, \'ol. I, p. 63.
(^) D" Cafes ai^^ucJ and dcierniiiicd in 28th of his prcfcnt
MajelH', p. i^.
tloii
[ 47 1
tion afFefted by them nor by the gift of the refiduCj
did not reveal the fame to Mr. Pearfon's folli-
citor. Upon the death of Mr. James Butler fome
time after, his eftates defcended upon his two
daughters. The hufband of one of them (Mr.
Bennet) in 1774 had alfo advanced £. 2978
to Mr. John Butler, upon the fecurity of the
£. 8000 portion^, (fubjciSl: to the firft £. 3000
advanced by Mr. Pearfon). Upon the 24th of
laft June, Mr. Juftice Buller, fitting for Lord
Chancellor, faid, " he ftrongly inclined to think
^^ it a fatisfaclionj" and the Lord Chancellor him-
felf, on the 27 th of laft November, decreed the
gift of the refidue to be a fatisfadion for the por-
tion fecured by the marriage-fettlemcnt. But as
to the £. 3000 lent by Mr. Pearfon, the Court
held, that Mr. James Butler's declaration to the
lender's follicitor bound both him and his lands ;
^and that fum was therefore dire6le*d to be raifed
and paid to Mr. Pearfon. But no relief hath been
given to Mr. Bennet for the money he advanced-.
If Mr. James Butler had remained tenant in
tail of the eilates charged with £. 8000, and
he had died infolvent as to his perfonality, I know
not what redrefs Mi*. Pearfon would have had ; but
he had acquired the fee fimple, and it was bound
in equity by his verbal undertaking. It is not
pofiible to adduce a ftronger inftance than this
cafe, to prove the truth of what I have advanced
concerning the neceffity there often is of making
perfonal confidence the ground of opinion in the
approbation of a landed fecurity for m.oney. The
words of the Court, in delivering the decree in this
caufe, are : '^ The enquiry was a very proper one
" on the part of the plaintiff (viz. Pearfon) and
" completely repels the imputation of neglio-ence
" in his agent ; and the enquiry was properly m.ade
" of the party immediately interelled. James at
" the
[ 4S ]
" the time of the enquiry, had the equitable inte-
*' reft in the eftate,, and upon the applicaf.ion, af-
*' fured the plaintiff, that he might fafely lend his
" money : the enquiry was d:e moft rnatc-riai the
"^ plaintiff could make." It appears from ':he cafe,
that Mr. Hull was alfo concern :^d for Mr. Ben-
net, and it is to be prefumed, that having done
(by the confcffion of the Court) vthatcvcr he couid
do, to acquire the knowledge and information which
was rrquifite for his client to know about the
charge and term, upon the fecurity of which Mr.
Pearfon lent his money, he could retain no doubt
about recommending it to his other client Mr.
Bennet, who lent £. 2978 upon the fam.e fe-
curity, the repayment of which has not as yet been
decreed. The material point of law in this cafe,
was the decifion, after feveral hearings, that the
refidue of a perfonal eftate is to be taken as a
fatisfaftion for a portion. As this point had not
before been decided, it could not be imputed to
the negligence nor i^^cnorance of the agent or his
conveyancer, (vvlio was very eminent in the pro-
fefTion, and is fince dead) that they did not objedt
againft the fecurity upon this gro;md- But as to
my argument, it would have been the fame, if all
the advancements had been made by the father in
his lifetime. Here was no attempt at fraud in
either of the MefTrs. Butkr j but in this fuppofition,
there were no fure means of coming at the know-
ledge of the prior advancements. The law re-
quired nc fort of notoriety to attend the fa6l :
both fons denied it ; the conveyancer was not to
fuppofe, what was not ftated to him ; the agent
could not acquire the information, to fubmit it to
tlie conveyancer : and thus, without any blame
imputable to the agent ; without any refleftion up-
on the conveyancer, Mr. Pearfon but for the
perfonal and accidental undertaking of Mr. James
o Butler,
[ 49 ]
Buder, would have been) and Mr. Bennet aclually
is expofed to die lofs of a large fum of money un-
der all the fanftion, prote6tion and fecurity, which
the law, as it now ftands, affords him for his pro-
perty. I go ftill farther -, for, fuppofing a convey-
ancer fhould ftate the ftrongell doubts, whether the
whole or part of the fortune Jiad been advanced or
raifed, yet are there no pofTible means of acquiring
diis knowledge for certain, againft the determina-
tion of the two fons to fupprefs the fafts.
The ancient law and policy of our anceftors
could not, confiflently with that notoriety, which,
as 1 have fo often faid, they thought neceffary to
attend every acl of alienation or afFc6lion of land-
ed property, admit into conveyances of land, all
thofe modern rejlrahnng and enabling powers, the
creation, execution and effects of which, have
conftituted a very confiderable branch of equity.
But of die dodrine of powers, it is not my pur-
pofe to fay any m.ore, tlian that from their very
nature, the want of notoriety in the creation, as
well as execution of them, muft ever leave to pur-
chafers and mortgagees much perfonal confidence
to rely upon for the fecurity of their titles. And
fince a great part of family fettlements at prefent
turns upon thefe very powers, under which the
portions for the younger children of families are
often provided and fecured, it becomes very ef-
fential and important to the community, that thefe
titles lliould be clear and certain j for when fuch
portions are raifed and paid to younger children,
it rarely happens, that the owners of the lands,
which are charged with them, are capable of pay-
ing off the money, and it is generally done by
others, who advance it upon the fecurity or under
the deed creating the powers. And if there can
poffibly exift a confederacy between father and fon,
or the younger children themfclves and their truf-
E tees.
r JO ]
fees, or even If impofition, treachery or deceit,
may be fuppofed to exift in any one of them j
by what means can the moft attentive attorney,
the moft cautious conveyancer, and the moft
wary lender, prevent, counteraft, or hinder the
fraud ? We have feen the cfFecls of involuntary
error in the judgment of MeiTrs. Butler. How
necelTary then it is to eftablifh an unerring
fource of notoriety and information, which every
purchafer, lender or mortgagee may refort to
with confidence and certainty ? For it is evident,
that where one part of a title muft be made public
and notorious, and the other parr of it requires no
fuch notoriety, there ever will exift more doubt
and uncertainty about the fupprelled part of the
title, than if none of it had been made public.
What has been faid, will I hope be conclufive,
that no charge nor difcharge of land ought to be
efteded, but by a deed or acl of public notoriety.
More ckcimjiantlal Proofs.
The more we refleft upon this fubje(51^, the more
circumftances ftiall we find, that render the noto-
riety I have been fpeaking of, more necefTary ac
prefent, than at any paft period of time. The firft
of thefe is the more general lubdivifion and equal"
partition of landed property: by which means,,
titles are multiplied and become more complex by
derivation, and therefore lefs certain, becaufe lefs
notorious, for want of title deeds j which, when
cftatcs are tranferred in parcels, or otherwife par-
tially affe6led, cannot be delivered over to each
purchafer or incumbrancer, as if the whole eftate,
to which the deeds are the muniments, had been
fold or affefted together. And I know no rea-
fon, which more emphatically proves the expe-
diency of my propofal^ than the doftrine and pre-
J f«ns
[ 51 ]
fcnt law concerning the delivery, pofiefllon and
cuftody, of title deeds.
Of Title Deeds,
The cafes, which have been deternained, relative
to the delivery, pofTcfTion and ciiftody, of title
deeds and notice to purchafers and incumbrancers,
have very frequently arifen from matters in re-
giftering counties. But whatever relates to the
regiflering acts, fhail be referved for future confi-
deration.
1 do not find that the delivery, adual poffefljon
or cuftody of the title deeds, is eflfential to the
validity of a purchafe or mortgage ; for a man
feifed in fee-ftmple of ten thoufand acres of land
may validly mortgage or fell it out in tive hundred
parcels, and yet it will be impoffible to deliver title
deeds to each mortgagee and purchafer. And if
the delivery of the title deeds were effential to the
validity of a mortgage or purchafe, yet in many
cafes, it would be of no avail, efpecially fince it
has been the general practice to make two and
fometimes more original parts of one and the fame
deed, (and without any thing appearing upon the
face or back of fuch deeds, to Ihew how many
parts of them v/cre executed). A man having
collefled for fixty years back duplicates of all his
title deeds, might at different times make out fuch
a title, as would and muft, in the nature of bufi-
nefs, be approved of by counfel, and fell and
mortgage the land to A. v/hich he had previoufly
fold or mortgaged to B. without a poffibility of
"the preconveyance being difcovered by the moft
diligent attorney, or fcrupulous and intelligent con-
veyancer.
E % Jfufpcfei
[ 5t ]
A Juppqfed Cafe,
I will fuppofe two common recoveries fuffered,
and two marriage fettlements made riicceffivelv of
the manor of Dale ; and thefe to run bacii into the
laft century. The reverfion in fee, under the fe-
cond fettlcment, veils in the heir at law of the fet-
tler. He is in poffefTion of the land, and of two
fets of thefe fettlements, which are the title deeds,
and prove, to the fatisfa6]:ion of the conveyancer,
the right and title of the reverfioner's heir at law.
If thefe original fettlements are given up to a pur-
chafer, and it is known from examination, or from-
official extrads, that the recoveries have been well
■fufFered, the fettlements themfelves being the
deeds to make the tenants to the precipe, (or what
by nonprofefiional perfons are called the reco-
very deeds) ; I fay that a conveyancer \s fundus offi-
cio, by approving of the title, and recommending
the purchafe or mortgage : and even fhould he
Hate in his opinion the poiTibility of a preconvey-
ance or fale or mortgage to another perfon, I
know of no means whatever, by which fuch fug-
geftion of doubt could be cleared away to his mo-
nied client, nor of any remedy that his client
would have againft the land or the prior pur-
chafer or mortgagee. For I think, that it will be
readily allowed, that the perfonal aileverations,
pledges and covenants of a perfon fo void of good
faith as to attempt fuch a fraud, v;ill afford but
flight relief to this fecond purchafer or mortgagee.
Such a cafe could not by pofllbility happen, if
every deed was null without inrolmenr, and the in-
rolment was full noiice to a purchafer or mort-
gagee.
J real
[ S3 ]
A real Cafe anonymous,
A perfoDj in a large trading maritime town,
had taken a long building leafe of an cxtcnfive
piece of ground : he mortgaged parts of it to two
perfons fucccfTively, and delivered copies of his
title deeds to the mortgagees, alledging, that he
could not deliver up the original title deeds, as
they affedted other lands befides thofe, that were
mortgaged, which he had in contem.plation to af-
fign and underlet in different parcels : at length,
after he had twice mortgaged the fame parcels of
ground, without giving any notice of the firfl
miOrtgagcs, he procures a third perfon to advance
him a fu.n of money upon them, larger than either
of the two firfl: mortgages ; and to this third mort-
gagee he delivers his title deeds. The queftion is,
to whofe debt Ihall the land be firfl: liable ? For it
will barely anfwer one of the fums advanced upon
it. I need not fay, that the perfonal refponfibility
of this iniquitous mortgagor is of little avail. The
cafe is intended to be brought into court. How
neceflfary for the prevention of fuch pra6tices, is a
repofitory of infallible certitude, by which a lender
niay know the fecurity, upon which he advances his
money ?
Of the Regiflry of Deeds and Wills by Acl of
Parliament.
I cannot introduce this fubjeft more properly,
than by repeating the preamble of the 2d and 3d
of Queen Ann, which was the precedent and fample
of the other regifliering a6ls. And what this adt
recites of the wefl:-riding of the county of York
will appear at prefent more applicable to the
nation at large, on account of the extended ftate
of its commerce, than it was at that time appli-
E 3 cable
[ 54 ]
cable to the weft-riding of the county of York.
" Whereas the weft-riding of the county of
" York is the principal place in the north for
" the cloath manufaftory, and moft of the traders
" therein are freeholders, and have frequent oc-
" cafions to borrow money upon their eftates, for
" nianaging their faid trade, but for want of a
" regifter, find it difficult to give fecurity to the
" fatisfaftion of the money-lenders, (although the
" fecurity they offer be really good) ; by means
*' whereof the faid trade is very much obftrucHied,
" and uiany familic-s ruined." Such was the fenfe
of the legiflature, rcfpcfting a very populous and
trading diftrift ; and fuch, I am confident, to
the confiderate part of the nation, will it be for
the country at large, in order to enable ve;idors
and mortgagors to make fuch clear and fatis-
fadlory tides, as will induce monied men to inveft
their money in real fccurities. One and the fame
principle a6luated them in that and the other
three regiftering acls, and us in our prefent at-
tempt. Let us confider the means they have
adopted, to carry that principle into pradbice.
There is not a doubt, but that thefe rcgiftries
were planned, formed and eftabliftied, for the mu-
tual benefit and conveniency of lenders and bor-
rowers of money on land fc^curity. The pream-
ble of an a6l is called by Lord Coke, the key
to open the meaning and intent of the ftatute ; and
by the preamble to the firft regiftering aft of Queen
Ann, which has been quoted, it evidently appears,
that the evil intended to be remedied by the ftatute
was the want of notoriety in the titles of land
owners, from which the invefting of money in
purchafes and on mortgages was obftrufled and
rendered difficult. Let us then fee, what remedy,
and in what m-anncr^ the acl has provided againft
this eviL
It
t 55 3
It ena61:s, that (a) " a memorial of all deeds
^' and conveyances, which from and after the nine
" and twentieth day of September in the year of
" our Lord one thoufand feven hundred and four,
" fhall be made and executed, and of all wills
^' and devifes in writing made or to be made and
" publifhed, where the devifor or teftator fhall die
*^ after the faid nine and twentieth day of Sep-
" tember, of or <:oncerning, and whereby any ho-
*' nors, manors, lands, tenements or hereditaments,
** in the faid weft- riding, may be any way af-
*^ fe6led in law or equity, may, at the election of
*' the party or parties concerned, be regiftered in
*' fuch a manner, as is hereinafter direfted ; and
** that every deed or conveyance that fhall, at any
" time after any memorial is fo regiftered, be made
*^ and executed of the honors, manors, lands, te-
" nements or hereditaments, or any part thereof,
" comprized or contained in any fuch memorial,
*' fhall be adjudged fraudulent and void againft
" any fubfequent purchafer or mortgagee for va-
*^ luable confderacion, unlefs fuch memorial there-
" of fliall be regiftered, as by this aft is direfted,
*^ before the regiflering of the memorial of the
** deed or conveyance, under which fuch fubfe-
" quent purchafer or mortgagee fhall claim ; and
^^ that every devife by will of the honors, manors,
" lands, tenements or hereditaments, or any part
" thereof mentioned or contained in any m.emo-
*' rial fo regiftered as aforefaid, that fhall be
" made and publifned after the regiftering of fuch
*' memorial, fnall be adir.dged fraudulent, and void
*' againft any fubfequent purchafer or mortgagee
" for valuable confideration, unlefs a memjorial of
" fuch will be regiftered in fuch manner as is here-
*' inafter directed."
(/?) z & 3 Ann, c. 4.
E 4 And
i: 56 ]
And it ena6ts, that " all and every mennorials
" fo to be entered or regifteredj fliail be put into
*' writing, in vellum or parchment, and diredied
*' to the regifter of the faid office ; and in cafe of
" deeds and conveyances, fhall be under the hand
*' and feal of fome or one of the grantors, or fome
" or one of the grantees, his or their guardians
" or truftees, attefted by two witnefies, one where-
" of to be one of the witnefies to the execution
" of fuch deed or conveyance; which witnefs (hall,
*' upon his oath before the faid regiftcr or his de-
'^ puty, prove the figning and fealing of the faid
** memorial, and the execution of the deed or
" conveyance mentioned in fuch memorial ; and
'' in cafe of wills, the memorials fhall be under
*' the hand and feals of fome or one of the devi-
" fees, his or their guardians or truftees, attefted
'' by tvvo witnefies, one v; hereof fhall, upon his
" oath before the faid regifter or his deputy, prove
" the figning and fealing of fuch memorial ; which
" refpeftive oaths, the faid regifter or his deputy,
" is hereby impowered to admiinifter."
And it further enaifVs, that " every memorial
*^ of any deed, conveyance or will, fiiall contain
*' the day of the month, and the year, when fuch
*' deed, conveyance or will, bears date, and the
" names and additions of all the parties to fuch
" deed or conveyance, and of the devifor, or tefta-
" trix to fuch will, and of all the witneffes to fuch
*' deed, conveyance or will, and the places of their
" abode, and fhall exprefs or mention the honors,
*^ manors, lands, tenements and hereditaments,
" contained in fuch deed, conveyance or will, and
*' the names of all the parifhes, townfiiips, ham-
" lets, precinfts or extraparochial places, within
" the laid weft- riding, where any fuch honors,
*^ manors, lands, tenements or hereditaments, are
*' lying or being, that are given, granted, convey-
<' td.
[ 57 ]
" ed, devifed, or any way afFefbed or charged by
" any fuch deed, conveyance or will, in fiich man-
*' ner, as the fame are expreli'ed or mentioned in
" fuch deed, conveyance or will, or to the lame
" effeil; and that every fuch deed, conveyance
*• and will, or probate of the fame, of which fuch
*' mem.orial is ih to be regiftered, as aforefaid,
" fliall be produced to the faid regifter or his de-
" puty, at the time of entering fuch memorial,
" who Ihall indorfe a certificate on every fuch deed,
'' conveyance and will, or probate thereof, and
**' therein mention the certain day, hour and time,
*' on which fuch memorial is lb entered and re-
" giftered, expreffing alio in what book, page and
" number, the fame is entered ; and that the faid
" regifter, or his deputy, fhall fign the faid certi-
'•^ ficate v/hen fo indorfed ; which certificates fhall
" be taken and allowed as evidence of fuch re-
" fpe6live regiftries in all courts of record what-
" foeverj and that every page of fuch regifter-
*' books, and every memorial, which fhall be en-
*'^ tered therein, fhall be numbered, and the day
*' of the month, and the year, and hour, or time
" of the day, when every memorial is regiftered,
*' fliali be entered in the margins of the faid re-
" gifter books, and of the faid memorial ; and that
" every fuch regifter fliall keep an alphabetical
" calendar of all parifhes, extraparochial places
*' and townfliips within the faid weft-riding, with
" reference to the number of every memorial, that
" concerns the honors, manors, lands, tenements,
" or hereditaments, in every fuch parifli, extrapa-
" rochial place, or tov/nlhip refpedively, and the
" names of the parties mentioned in fuch memo-
" rial ; and that fuch regifter Ihall duly file every
" fuch memorial in order of time, as the fame
^^ Ihall be brought to the faid office, and enter or
" regifter
[ 5S ]
^'^ regifler the fiiid memorials In the fame order,
" that they fhall refpedlively come to hand."
There is an exception, that the aft fhall not ex-
tend to copyhold eilates, or to any leafe not ex-
ceeding twenty-one years, where the aftual pofiTef-
fion and occupation goes along witJi the leafe.
It is obvious, why copyhold eilates are taken out
of the flatute; for their furrender in the manor
court anfwers the notoriety of transfer, which was
evidently intended to be introduced and eftablifli-
ed throughout the weft-riding of the county of
York by the regiftry.
The 2d and 3d of Ann, for eftablifhing a regi-
flry in the weft-riding of York, was the firft a6t
relating to the regiftry that paiTed ; and although
the framers of that adt appear not to have been
complete mafters of the fubjed:; yet it gave rife to
the experiment, and turned people's thoughts more
to the fubjedr, which, by the following regiftering
adfcs, received fome additional light and improve-
ment. Each of thefe afts moft pointedly tends to
eftablifh the principles, grounds and reafons, upon
which I am attempting to fliew the expediency, or
rather the necefTity, of an univerfal inrolment. As
much, as hath been quoted of the firft regiftering
a6l, is repeatedly enafted by the other afts, which
fucceftively eftabliftied the regiftry in the eaft-
riding of the county of York, in the 6th of Queen
Ann ; in the county of Middlefex, in the 7th of
Qiiecn Ann ; and in the north-riding of the county
of York, in the 8th of George IT.
The firft regiftering ad palTed in 1703 ; and in
1706, it was found proper to pafs (<:?) "An ad;
" for inrolmeni of bargains and fales within the Jaid
*' ivefi riding of the county of Tork in the regifler
** o^.ce, there lately provided, and for iuaking the Jaid
■{o) 5 Ann, c. 18.
" regifler
f 59 T
" regijlei' more effeolualT The primary reafon fof
pafllng this aft is fct forth in the preamble of it:
*' Whereas by an aft of parliament made in the
*' cyth year of the reig^n of King Henry the 8th,
*' intituled, For inrolments of bargains and Jales,
" it is enafted, That no manors, lands, tenements
** or other hereditaments, fhall pafs, alter or change
" from one to another, whereby any eftate of in-
" heritance or freehold fhall be made or take
" effeft in any perfon or perfons, or any ufe there-
" of to be made, by reafon only of any bargain and
" fale thereof, except the faid bargain and fale be
**■ made by writing indented arid fealed, and in-
" rolled in one of the king's courts of record at
" VVcilminfter, or elfe within the fame county or
" counties, where the fam.e manors, lands or tene-
" ments, fo bargained and fold lie or be, before
*' the cuftos rotulorum, and two juftices of the
*' peace, and the clerk of the peace of the fimc
" county or counties, or two of them at the leaft,
*^ whereof the clerk of the peace to be one ; which
*^ aft hath been found by experience to be of little
*' or no ufe within the weft-riding of the county of
*' York, as to the inrolments of barg-ains and fales
" Vv'ithin the^fiid weft-riding, for that the clerk of
" the peace thereof for the time being, who hatli
" the keeping of the faid inrolments within the
*' faid weft-riding, is not by the faid aft enjoined
*^ to give any fecurity for the fafe keeping, nor
** under any penalty for the negligent keeping of
*' the faid inrolments, nor is there by the faid aft
" any certain place appointed for the keeping
" thereof: And whereas by an aft of parliament
*^ made in the fecond year of his prefent Majefty's
" reign, intituled, An aft for the public regiftering
'' of all deeds, conveyances and wills, that fliall be
^' made of any honors, manors, lands, tenenients
*^ or hereditaments^ within the weft-riding of the
" county
[ 6o ]
" county of York, after the nine and twentieth day
*' of September 1704; a public office hath been
" ereded and eilabliflied at Wakefield, within the
** faid weft-riding, at the public charge thereof,
" for regiftering and fafe keeping of memcrials,
" of all deeds, conveyances and wills, within the
'^ faid riding, and a public regifter hath been
" chofen, who hath according to the directions of
" the fame act, given fufficienc fecurity for the due
" execution of the faid office." There is certainly
much good fenfe and reafon in this ; and it applies
as ftrongly to every part of the nation, as it does
to the weft- riding of the county of York: but be-
lides the inconveniency and mifchief v/hich is here
allcdged, there is another very objeclionable cir-
cumftance, that attends the prefent law ; it creates
and leaves a doubt in thofe, v/ho have occafion to
fearch for any fuch deed ; for after having per-
haps fearched in vain the four courts of record, for
the inroiment of a deed ; from the infrequency of
enrolling deeds with the clerk of the peace, it fre-
quently does not occur to them to extend their
fearch to the county, where the lands lie ; and if
thought of, every one knov/s the little fatisfaftion,
that probably would attend a fearch, where there is
no regular depofic of the records, where there is no
refponfibility upon the clerks to preferve them, no
obligation to keep them orderly and open to in-
ipcdtion, and little pradice of entering them upon
the rolls. Thefe are reafons, v/hich i'peak the ex-
pediency of abftradts being entered in each re-
fpeclive countv, of deeds, which afreft lands lying
in divers counties, or which are inrolied in any one
of the courts of record, as it is provided for by the
draft of the bill fubjoined to thefe ftieets.
'J he a6t very properly therefore gives to every
bargain and falc inrolied in the regifter office, at
Wakefield, the fame force, as if it had been in-
rolled
[ 6, ]
rolled in a court of record, or before the ciidos ro-
tulorum. Sec. according to the requifition of the
ad: of Henry VIII. and regiftered according to
the fecond and third of Ann.
In the firfl: regiftering a6t, no mention was made
of judgments, llatutes and recognizances, which
afFe,
" her or their executors or adminiftrators, or at-
" torney, or any of them, he, fiie or they, paying
" for the fame the fuoi of one ffiilling and no
« more.'*
And there is a provifo in the aft, that " if any
"judgment, fbatute,or recognizance, be regiftered
*' in the faid regifUer-office, within thirty days,
*^ after the acknowledgment or figning thereof,
" all the lands that the defendant or cognizor
** had at the time of fuch acknowledgment or
^'- figning, fhall be bound thereby,"
But as it was found neceffary to enter and pub-
lifli every charge and incumbrance upon the
land J fo was it reafonable, whenever thefe charges
or incumbrances were fatisfied and paid ,off, that
the difcharge or exoneration of the land ffiould
alfo be known, as its value and price thereby
would vary much to a purchafer or incumbran-
cer : for it frequently happens, that land is affcded
and incumbered by a deed, and the money or
debt is difcharged, without the parties entering
into any new deed or writing, and therefore the
aft enafts, that " in cafe of mortgages, that ffiall
" be inrolled in the faid rcgifter- office, purfuant
** to this aft, or whereof memorials have been or
" fliall be entered, purfuant to the faid aft made
*' in the fccond year of her prefcnt Majcftv's reign ;
« and
[ 63 ]
*^ and alfo in cafe of judgments, flatutes and re-
" cognizances, whereof memorials fliall be entered
" in the faid regifter-qffice, purfuant to this a6t;
" if at any time afterwards, a certificate Iliall be
" brought to the faid rcgiller or his deputy, figned
" by the refpedlive mortgagors and mortgagees
*' in fuch mortgage, plaintiffs and defendants in
*' fuch judgment, cognizor or cognizees in fuch
" ftatute or recognizance refpeftively, their refpec-
" tive executors, admin iftrators or affigns, and at-
" telted by two witnefles, whereby it (hall appear,
*' that all monies due upon fuch mortgage, judg-
" ment, ftatute or recognizance refpedtively, have
'' been paid or fatisfied in difcharge thereof, which
" witnelfcs fhall upon their oath, before the faid
" regifter or his deputy, (who are hereby refpec-
** tively impowered to adminifter fuch oath) prove
" fuch monies to be fatisfied or paid accordingly,
" and that they faw fuch certificate figned by the
" faid mortgagors and mortgagees, plaintiffs and
" defendants, cognizors and cognizees refpeftively,
" their refpe6live executors, admin iftrators or af-
^* figns; that then, and in every fuch cafe, th^
" faid regifter or his deputy, ihall make entry in
" the margin of the faid regifter books, againil
" the inrolment of fuch mortg-ao-e or re^iftrv of
*^ the memorial thereof, and againft the regiflry
*' of fuch judgment, ftatute or recognizance re-
" fpedively, that fuch mortgage, judgment, fta-
" tute or recognizance refpeftively, was fatisfied
** and difcharged according to fuch certificate, to
" which the fame entry fliall refer; and fliall after
" file fuch certificate to remain upon record in the
"^ faid regifter-ofBce."
There is one fmgularity in this afl', that I can-
not pafs over without fome obfervation ; it cna<5ls,
that " all copies of the inrolments thereof reniain-
*^ iiig on record in the faid regifter- office, fliall be
" allowed
[ 64 ]
" allowed In all courts, where fiich bargains and
" Tales, or copies, fhall be produced to be as good
" and fufficient evidence, as any bargains and fales
" inrolled in any of the courts at Weftminfcer, and
" the copies of the inrolments thereof." This
claufe, as well as the other annendments of the
fecond and third of Ann, is introduced into the
fixth of Ann, by which a regifter ofiice is efta-
blifhed in the eaft -riding of the county of York ;
and yet within four years after that time, viz. in
the tenth of Ann (a), the legiflature found it ut-
ceflary to pafs an exprefs law to make office copies
of bargains and fales inrolled under the ftatute of
Henry the Eighth, evidence. Such different a6ls
upon the fame fubjecft, argue but little knowledge
of the law, in the framers of the a6ts : for if the
tenth of Ann were ncceffary to be pafied, the co-
pies of bargains and fales were not evidence in any
court; and then this claufe of the fifth of Ann is
abfolutely futile and abfurd ; for it does not abfo-
lutely make fuch copies evidence, but it only
makes them ds much evidence as other copies, which
were not evidence at all ; and if copies of inrol-
ments were evidence before the tenth of Ann, then
is that ftatute nugatory and redundant and mif-
chicvous, by confining its efFefts to one fort of in-
rolled deeds, when it ought to have extended tb.em
to all J for many forts of deeds befides bargains
and fales, vt'ere inrolled by the common law, before
the ftatute of Henry VIII. as they ftill may be.
The preamble of the feventh of Queen Ann, for
cftablifliing a regiflry in the county of Middlefex,
which is one and tiie fame in efFefl as in the three
other regiflering adls, fpeaks fuch forcible language
in fupport of an univerfal iniolment a6l, that I
cannot pafs it by unnoticed (^). "Whereas by
{a) lo Ann, c. 18. {h) 7 Ann, c. 20.
** the
t 6s ]
" the different and fecret ways of conveying lands,
'* tenements, and hereditaments, fuch, as are ill
'^ difpofed, have it in their power to commit fraud,
*' and frequently do fo, by means whereof feveral
** perfons, who through many years indufny in
'* their trades and employments, and by greac fru-
" gality, have been enabled to purchafe lands, or
" to lend monies on land lecurity, have been un-
" done in their ; urchafes and mortgages, by prior
" and fecret conveyances, and fraudulent incum-
" brances ; and not only themfelves, but their
" whole families thereby utterly ruined."
Who will ferioufly admit even the poflibility of
fuch evils, and deny that a remedy ought to be
applied to them? And who will hefitate to anfvver
this obvious queftion? When land is brought to
market, fhould there exift a poflibility of its being
clogged with hidden charges and fecret incum-
brances ? Befides the alterations or improvements
already mentioned, introduced into the regiilering
afts by the fixth of Ann (all of which are incorpo-
rated by that a6t into the firft regiftering a6t for
the weft-riding) there is one other, which is intro-
duced by that aft into all the three afts for the
three feveral ridings for the county of York, but
which never was introduced into that for the county
of Middlefex ; I do not in fadl fee that it hath any
immediate connection with the regiftry or inrol-
ment, any more than altering a form of pleading,
has with recording a verdi6l or judgment (a).'*
" And be it further cnafted by tlie authority afore-
" faid, that in all deeds of bargain and fale here-
" after inrolled, in purfuance of this a6l, whereby
*' any cftate of inheritance in fee-fimple is limited
" to the bargainee and his heirs, the words Grant,
** Bargain, and Sale, (hall amount to, and be con-
{a) 6 Ann, c. 35. k£i, 30.
F " ftrued
[ 65 1
" ftrued and adjudged in all courts of judicature:
i' to be exprefs covenants to the bargainee, his
" heirs and afligns, from the bargainor, for himfelf,
" his heirs, executors and adminiftratore-, that the
" bargainor, notvvithftanding any a6t done by him,
" was at the time of the execution of fuch deed
*' feifed of the hereditaments and premiffes thereby
" granted, bargained and fold, of an indefeafible
*' eftate in fee fimple, free from all incumbrances
'^ (rents and fervices due to the lord of the fee
" only excepted) and for quiet enjoyment thereof,
'^ againft the bargainor, his heirs and afTigns, and
" all claiming under him, and alfo for further
" alTurance thereof to be made by the bargainor,
*' his heirs and afligns, and ail claiming under him,
" unlefs the fame lliall be reftrained and limited
" by exprefs particular words contained in fuch
*' deed; and that the bargainee, his heirs, executors,
'^ adminiftrators and afngns refpe6lively, fhall and
*' may in any aftion to be brought, aflign a breach
'^ or breaches thereupon, as they might do in cafe
" fuch covenants were exprefsly inferted in fuch
" bargain and faie."
This idea, I prefume, was borrowed from Sir
Matthew Plale, who in the before-mentioned pam-
phlet (p. 37) fays, " that to prevent the length of
** covenants in deeds, there be thought of certain
" words, that may carry in them the ftrength of co-
*■' venants or warranties ; as for inftance (dedij or
" give) to include a warranty and covenant againft
" all men, and alfo for further afilirances ; (grant)
" to include a warranty and covenant againft the
" party and all claiming under him, and for fur-
" ther alTurances for feven years ; (deliver) to in-
" elude a v/arranty and covenant againft the party
" and his anceftors and all claiming under them,
" and for further affurances within feven years;
" and divers inftances of this kind might be con-
" tinued
[ 67 ]
" tinued by fhort words to include large fen-
" tences (<^).
Certain it is, that the prefent mode of convey-
ancing is more formal and prolix, than is neceflfary
to give effe6t to a deed. The nicety and extreme
caution of fome, the diffidence of others, and fear
to omit any thing, that they can fuppofe will be
binding in a deed, and perhaps the lucrative views
of others, in extending conveyances with their
wifhes or love of gain, are the unjuftifiable and
iinfatisfa^lory reafons for keeping on foot this
formal prolixity in modern conveyances. But
when we refled:, that every man is entitled to draw
his own deeds and wills, and that he may ufe what-
ever words and terms he pleafes to exprefs his own
meaning and intentions, and that each deed and
will differs one from the other, it will not be found
feafible to reduce conveyances, like certain writs
and procelTes, to a fixed form of words, terms, and
fentences. I fhall fay no more upon this fubjeft,
as it is not connefted with the notoriety of deeds
and muniments touching the title of lands : but if
hereafter any innovation fliould be attempted to be
introduced into the pradlice of conveyancing, it
furely ought to be fubmitted in a full and compre-
henfive view to the legiflature, that they may a6l
therein as in their wifdom fliall feem proper.
The laft regiftering ad, which is the eighth of
Geo. the id, by which a rcgiPcer ofHce was erefted
and eftablifhed in the north-riding of the county
of York, has no further improved upon any of the
former regiftering ads, than by exprelTing a fenfe
of the inefficient method of entering memorials in,
that inept, mutilated, and ineffectual manner pre-?
fcribed by that ad, as well as by the three other
(a) The word grant implies a general warranty ; Croke
Ja. 234. Hil. 7. Jac.
F 2 regiftering
[ 6S ]
regiftering afts : it gives licence to inrol deeds and
wills at large, inflcad of regiftering thenn in the
manner before mentioned. It was rightly judged,
that if a repofitory was once eftabiiflied for the me-
morials of deeds, it ought to be a complete con-
fervatory of men's titles to their eftates. For this
end, the purport of every deed fhoukl be knov/n,
but by a memorial, the purport of no deed can be
known.
(a) " And whereas deeds have been often de-
*' ftroyed by fire and other accidents, be it further
" enafted by the authority aforefaid, that from
" and after the faid 29th day of September 1736,
*' any perfon or perlbns having or claiming title to
*^ any honors, manors, lands, tenements or he-
" reditaments, in the faid north-riding, may re-
'* gifter at full length in the faid regifter-ofnce, all
** and every or any the deeds, writings, wills or
" conveyances, by or under which, fuch title fhall
" be claimed, and which fnall be miade and exe-
*' cuted, or figned and publiflied, and in the cafe
*' of v/ills, where the devifor or teftatrix fhall die
" after the faid 29th day of Septem.ber in the year
" of our Lord 1736 ; and the faid regifter or his
*^ deputy is hereby authorized to enter and inroi
*' all fuch deeds, writings, Vv'ills and conveyances,
" as (hall be fo brought to be regiftered at full
**■ length, by ingrolTing tl.c rn in parchment books j
" and the faid regifter or his deputy (hall, in the
" margin of every fuch entry and inrolment, men-
" tion the time of fuch entry and inrolment, and
" fhall indorfe and fign a certificate on fuch deed,
*• conveyance, or will, in m.anner, as is by this adt
•*' direfled, where a memorial is entered, and fhall
" fafcly keep all and every the books, wherein fuch
" entries and inrolments fhall be made in the faid
{a) 8 Geo. 3. c, 6. fc£l. 32.
X " public
[ 69 ]
" public office, there to remain upon record; and
" all copies of fucli entries and inrolnients of fuch
" deeds, writings, wills and conveyances, fo re-
" giftered at full length, and which copies Hiall be
" figncd by the faid regifter or his deputy, and
" attefted by two or more witnefles, fhall be al-
" lowed in all courts of record to be good and fuf-
" ficient evidence of fuch deeds, writings, wills or
*' conveyances, fo regidered and deftroyed by fire
" or other accident."
Can any thing be more unm.anly and frivolous,
than for the framers of fo important an a6l of
parliament, to acknowledge themfelves thus pub-
licly fcnfible of a moft material defedl in the fyf-
tem of regifcering, and to point out the remedy,
but leave it only optional, as if they were fearful
of enjoining and compelling the means, which
would be efFeftualiy remedial of the evil felt and
complained of?
To the end a remedy may be complete, it mud
be commenfurate with the evil. Where then the
evil confifts in the pofiibility of a land-ov/ner's
fupprelTing or falfifying his title, the remedy, to
be commenfurate with the evil, fhould take away
this pofiibility ; which nothing, that is not univer-
fiilly coercive, can effect. By the regiftering afts,
the entering the memorial of a deed is merely
voluntary and optional ; it neither gives nor takes
away validity, it only fecures in fome cafes a pri-
ority amongft different incumbrancers.
'The Conjequences of a Deed not regijlered.
To fhew the confequences and effedls of thefe
afls in a ftronger light, we will fuppofe that a land-
owner in the well-riding of the county of York,
having an unincumbered landed property, fettles it
upon his family and dies. The deed, though not
F 3 regiftered.
[ 70 ]
regiflered, is to all intents and purpofes valid
againft all mankind, except againft a piirchafer or
mortgagee ; and I fuppole none fuch. His fon
takes under this fetclement an eftate in tail male :
but finding it not rcgiftered, keeps it in his own pof-
fefllon ; fells the land, and dies without ifllie. His
brother is, under the fettlement, the next remain-
der man in tail male. Is it, or fhould it be deter-
mined by law, that the negleft of the fettler,
which could not afcerwards be redlified or fupplied,
fhall have the effe6b of extinguifhing the entail and
barring the remainder man, who by the law ought
only to be barred by the formality and notoriety
of a fine or common recovery ? If fo, it would
encourage and fupport the groffeft fraud, de-
ceit and impofition. So much I fuppofe, if the
deed creating the entail be not regiftered.
^he Confequences of a Deed regiftered.
If I may be admitted freely to difcufs thefe afts
of parliament, it muft be allowed, that if a me-
morial of fuch a deed be regiftered according to
the diredlions and in ftrift compliance with every
requifition of the regiftering a6ts, the confufion,
inconveniency and injuftice, which might arife to
all parties concerned in it, would be infinitely
greater by the regiftering of it, than if it had not
been regiftered.
My nonprofeflional readers will excufe my run-
ning into detail, in order the better to expofe my
reafoningto a conclufive judgment. I will fuppofe
an indenture of three parts made between t!ie land-
owner of the firft part, his intended wife of the
fecond part, and one or more truftees of the third
parti by which he fettles his eftate on himfelf and
intended wife for life fuccclTively, with a provi-
fion for younger children, with remainder to the
firft
[ 71 ]
ftrft and other fons of the marriage in tall male,
remainder to the firft and other fons of the fetuler
by any other woman in tail male, remainder to
the firft and other daughter and daughters of the
marriage, remainder to the fettler's brother for life,
remainder to his tirft and other fon and fons in
tail male, remainder to the fettler in fee ; with
powers to the two tenants for life of charging
the lands with portions for their younger children,
and of jointuring their wives, and with other pow-
ers of fale, exchange, leafing, and of revocation
and new appointment by the fettler. This deed
being drawn, a memorial thereof is alfo prepared
and executed at one and the fame time with the
deed. This memorial, according to the a6l, is
under the hand and feal of the grantor or fettler, at-
tefted by two witnefTes to the execution of the deed
of fettlement, and the execution thereof is proved
by the oath of one of fuch attefting witnelTes. This
memorial contains and fees forth the date of the
deed, and the exa6t defcription of the parties to
it, and the names and places of abode of the wit-
nefles to the execution of it by the party, who figns
and feals the memorial, and fuch of the parcels
as lie in the diftrid: fubjefl to the regiftry. And
when fuch memorial Ihall have been entered, and
a certificate indorfed upon the deed, mentioning
the certain day, hour and time, on which ilich me-
morial is fo entered and regiftered, and expreffing
alfo in what book, page and numbe]-, the faime is
entered, fhall have been figned by the regifter or
his deputy, fuch indoried certificate fhall be taken
and allowed as evidence of the regiftry in every
court of record. Here then is a deed regiftered
in every particular, according to the requifuions
of the ad of parliament. Let us attend to its
efFeds.
As it is regiftered according to the ad, it is
F 4 good
[ 7^ 1
good and valid againft all mankind, even againft
purchafers and mortgagees, to whom the memorial,
as we have fcen, is complete notice of any prior
incumbrance created by that deed,at Icaft to every
one, who has feen or is informed of the memorial.
But a perfon of the moil ordinary underftanding,
will naturally apK, if a memorial ought to be, or
in faft can be notice of what it does not difclofe
nor mention. I fuppofe then an intended pur-
chafer of a part of this eilate, upon an advertife-
ment for fale, by the owner (who by the fetdement
is tenant for life only) fearches the regifter, and
finds the above-ftated memonal ; and from what-
ever appears upon the face of it, he cannot tell
whether it be the miemorial of a marriage fettle-
ment, an alignment of mortgage, annuity deed,
or, in fnort, what is the nature, purport and ef-
fect of the deed. The tenant tor life undertakes
to fell in fee -fimple : the fettlement is loft, mif-
laid, or depofited perhaps with a mortgagee or
lender of money, charged under the pov/ers of the
fettlement itfelf. And in this latter cafe, the
mortgagee may even in a court of equity refufe to
difcover his title deeds, upon this ground, that a
third perfon may find out a flaw in them. (^) It
is aflerted, that the deed in queftion was merely a
fettlement of jointure upon the wife, who is
dead, and of the land upon the ilTue male of the
marriage, with the immediate reverfion in fee to
the fettler, wh't* never had iifue male, but has ilRie
female, viz. three daughters : their provifion he
further afferts to be the fortune of their mother,
vefted in the funds. The purchafer completes his
purchafe of a part of thefe lands, pays his mo-
ney, and enters. The father goes abroad, and dies
out of the kingdom. One of the daughters pro-
(rt) Senhoufe v. Earle, 2 Vez. 450. Parrat v. Bellard, 2
Ch. Ca. 73. — Ibid 135. I Vcrn. 27.
cures
[ 73 ]
cures the original fettlement, and they enter upon
the purchafer, who c^Tcainly cannot maintain his
title. For the deed, under which the daughters
claim an cftate tail, would have been a nullity
againil the purchafer, if it had not been regiftered ;
but having been regiftered, and he having feen or
been informed of the contents of the memorial, it
is valid and conclufive againft him., and he is pre-
fumed in law to have been a purchafer with full
notice and knowledge of an eftate tail prior to his
own title : and this knowledge he is prefumed to
have acquired through the medium of an afl of
law, intended undoubtedly to clear, manifeft and
eftablifh the right and title of the lands, in the
purchafe of which he has invefted his money.
1'he Mif chief of the regijiering A^s.
Innumerable cafes within the line of frequent
occurrences might be fraced, to fnew the mifchie-
vous confequences and abfurdity of thefe afts.
Why does the non-regiftry of a deed or will render
it null and void againft a purchafer or mortgagee ?
But becaufe, if not regiftered, it is prefumed, that
the eftates and incumbrances created by them
may be fupprefted from his knowledge, and there-
fore that his title might afterwards be impeached
and defeated by the prior incumbrancer, or taker
under the valid deed. Why then fhould the re-
giftering of the deed prevent this effe6t ? But be-
caufe the purchafer or mortgagee is fuppofed to
take his purchafe or fccurity with his eyes open,
and with notice from t^t fuppofed notoriety of all
prior charges by the memorial. And we have feen,
that this fuppofed aft of notoriety, does not even
mention the confideration of the deed ; that is,
whether it be a mortgage in fee or for years, whe-
ther it be for £. 500 or ^. 10,000, whether there
be
[ 74 ]
be any limitations or powers of charging, felling,
leafing or other powers, or whether there are any
fhifting ufes, claiifes or provifoes, contained in the
deed, to affeft the land.
It is uncontrovertibly obvious, that if a deed be
intended to convey notice of a prior charge to a
purchafer or mortgagee, it mud effentially give
him certain and complete intelligence, to what ex-
tent the deed does aftually afFe6t the land : for
in purchafing or taking it in mortgage, he takes it
liable and fubjeft to all the limitations, trufts,
powers, provifoes, charges, conditions and cove-
nants contained in the deed^ of which, by the me-
morial, he is prefumed to have notice; but by
which he could not poffibly acquire any aftual or
real knowledge, intelligence, or information of
them.
I have hitherto fpoken of the knowledge, that is
fupprelTed, oris not difclofed by the memorial ^
I muft now fpeak of that, which is acquired by it :
and I fpeak from experience. The mere know-
ledge of lands having been affefled by a deed ge-
nerally, is an endlefs lource of unanfwerable diffi-
culties, doubts and objeftions, in clearing a title :
and every practitioner muft often have experienced
the truth of what Sir Matthew Hale foretold, long
before any of the regiftering acts were paflcd («).
" There muft be inrolled at leaft fo much of
'' the deed or evidence, that concerns, firft, par-
" ties, grantor and grantee ; fecondly, the things
*' granted ; thirdly, the eftate granted ; fourthly,
*' all thofe parts of the deed or evidence, that
" have any influence upon the eftate, as, rent re-
) " a
" deed to lead the ufes of a fine of the eftate of
*' the wife; the mafter of the Rolls was againfl ad-
" mittir.g a copy of the inrolment, and made a
*^ diftin(5tion that the inrolment of a bargain and
*^ fdle (by fiatute) is a record, but a deed for fafe
" cuftody might be faid to be recorded : yet on an
" ifilie direfted by lord keeper, the chief juftice
" admitted it in evidence." And in the before-
mentioned cafe of Smartle v. Williams., (3 Lev.
387) on a trial at bar, " a copy of a mortgage-
" deed" (which v/as not a bargain and fale accord-
ing to the fiatute) " was admitted, and the Court
" faid the acknowledgment binds the party and
*' all claim/mg under him."
{a) Sir M. Male's trr.ifl on the benefit of regiftering deeds,
p. 36.
{b) 2 Vern. 471. 591.
I can-
[ 83 ]
I cannot here forbear repeating an obfervatlon,
which I before made, that the fubjeft of thefe
Iheets had never been thoroughly inveftigated, ma-
turely confidered, nor fettled in any regular con-
fidency. Frorri the precedents that I have quoted,
it not only appears, that a copy of a bargain and
fiile inrolled according to the ftatute of Henry
VIII. but even of any other deed inrolled, whetlicr
for fafe cuftody or otherwife, may be produced in
evidence : but if diis were fuch pofitive and certain
law, whence then arofe the neceffity of paffing the
before mentioned a6l of the fixth of Richard II,
for if office copies were evidence of deeds inrolled,
why needed they to be exemplified under the great
feal to make them evidence ? And again, much
nearer to our own days, the following part of the
tenth of Queen Ann, c. i8. kc. 3. muft either
prove the law to be otherwife, or it is perfeftly
ufelefs and redundant: " and for fupplying a fail-
" urp in pleading or deriving the title to lands,
'^ tenements or hereditaments, conveyed by deeds
" of bargain and fale, indented and inrolled ac-
" cording to the fbatute made in the twenty-feventh
" year of the reign of King Henry VIII. for in-
*^ rolment of bargains and fales, where the original
" indentures of bargain and fale to be iliewed forth
" or produced, are wanting, which often happens,
" efpeciaily where divers lands, tenements or here-
" ditaments are comprized in the fame indenture,
" and afterwards derived to feveral perfons : Be in
" further enafted by the authority aforefaid, that
" wherein any declaration, avowry, bar, replication
" or other pleading whatfoever, any fuch indenture
" of bargain and fale inrolled, fnall be pleaded
" with a profert in curia, or offer to produce the
** fame, the perfon or perfons fo pleading, fhall
" and may produce and iliew forth, and be fuf-
'* fered and allowed to produce and lliew forth,
G 2 '"'by
[ H ]
*^ by the authority of this a6t, to anfwer fuch pro-
" fertt as well againft her Majefty, her heirs and
" fuccefTors, as againft any other perfon or perfons,
*' a copy of the inrolment of fuch bargain and
" fale, and fuch copy examined with the inrol-
'^ ment, and figned by the proper officer, having
*' the cuftody of fuch inrolment, and proved upon
*^ oath to be a true copy, fo examined and figned,
^' fl-jall be of the fame force and effe6t, to all in-
" tents and conftruflions of law, as the faid in-
'* dentures of bargain and fale were and fhould
" be of, if the fame were in fuch cafe produced
" and fhewn forth."
To follow up the obfervation ;. we muft not for-
get that it i? holden, that the acknowledgment binds
the party acknowledging, and all claiming under him :
and yet it is faid in {a) Taylor v. Jones, " If two
*' are parties to a deed, and one acknowledges it
**■ before a judge, it binds the other ; and if a
^' man lives in New England, and would pafs land
"■ here, they join a nominal party with him in the
" deed, who acknowledge-s, and it binds." Now,
if we do but reflect one moment upon the reafon,
nature and effe6t of an inrolment, we fhall find,
that the acknowledgment, which is the warrant to
the officer to inrol the deed, is nothing more nor
lefs, than an avowal by the granting party, that
the deed which he has executed is his own a6l and
deed ; and that he thus folemnly defires it may be
from thenceforth rendered notorious, and perpe-
tuated as a record of the court, for the purpofe
of manifefting, maintaining and eftablifliing the
tide. Now, what can fo ilrongly infult common
fenfe (and what elfe ffiould all law and equity
fpring from or be reduced to) as to be taught,
(^a) I Salk. 270.
;hat
[ 85 ]
that the (a) inrolment of a deed is to no other ptir-
po/e^ but that the party jhall not deny it afterwards ;
and that the acknowledgment of a mere nominal
party, who in fa6l is neither grantor nor grantee,
jhall bind, and make the inrohiient valid : for to
what good, or even mifchievous purpofe fhall a
mere nominal party deny a deed ?
Again it is holden, (/^) that againji a deed inrol-
led, a man may plead infancy, although none can
plead non efl factum j and yet why fhould the
acknowledgment by a mere nominal party, or by
a grantee, prevent the grantor, (whom I fuppofe
totally ignorant of the acknowledgment and fubfe-
qiient inrolment) from pleading yion efl factum, af-
ter fuch inrolment, more than if the deed had not
been inrolled ? After fuch glaring inconfiftencies,
it would be too abfurd to deny, that the law ought
to be amended and improved.
Before I entirely quit this fubjeft, it will not be
improper to call the attention of my readers to the
inattention and ignorance of parliament concerning
the law of inrolment. The 21ft Jam. I. c. 26,
after reciting, " that many lewd pcrfons of bafe
" condition, ufed to acknowledge deeds in the
" name of others, not privy nor confenting to
" the fame, which hath and daily doth turn to the
" great charge, trouble and undoing of many of
" the good fubjefts of this kingdom, and rather
^^ for that there is no remedy in law to reform
" thefe and the like abufes ;" enafts, " That all
" perfon or perfons acknowledging or procuring
" to be acknowledged, any deed or deeds inrolled
" in the name of any other perfon or perfons not
" privy or confenting to the fame, and being
" thereof lawfully convi6led or attainted, fhall be
(^) Viner. Inrolm. E. 3, pag. 445.
\b) 2 Lev, 65. Sir W. Pelhain's cafe.
G 3 " adjudged.
[ 86 ]
" adjudged, efteemed, and taken to be felons,
" and fuffcT the pains of death," &c. Now if,
as we have feen, the acknowledgment binds the
acknowledging party and all claiming under him,
and the inrolment binds only, when the deed hath
been acknowledged, (even by a nominal party)
I beg to be informed, what mifchievous effects can
be produced by the acknowledgment of a deed in
the name of another ferjcn not privy nor conjeniing
to the fame : for it is evident, that fuch perfon is a
ftranger to the deed, as well as to the inrolment of
it, and therefore utterly incapable of giving or tak-
ing away its validity and efFe6l. It is then certain,
that the framers of this a<5l, neither attended to
-nor underftood the nature, operation and crTe6ls of
acknowledging; and inrolline; deeds, &:c. &;g.
DO O '
Of the Inrolment of Roman Catholics Deeds,
The next time the legidature thought proper to
interfere or pals any law concerning the inrolment
of deeds, was upon the fpur of the times ; to
anfwer a particular purpofe, and produce a parti-
cular efted. This was to render notorious and
public every aft and deed, by which a catholic
pafTed, altered or changed his landed property.
For, by the ^d Geo. I. c. ilS, it is enaded, " That
*' from and after the twenty-ninth day of Septem-
" ber in the year 17 17, no manors, lands, tenements,
*' hereditaments, or any intereft therein, or rent or
*' profit thereout, fhall pafs, alter or change from
" any papift or perfon profefling the popifh reli-
*' gion, by any deed or ' will, except fuch deed
" within fix months after the date, and fuch will
*' within fix months after the death of the teftator,
*' be inrollcd in one of the king's courts of record
'* at Weftminfter, or elfe within the fame county
** or counties wherein the manors, lands and tene-
" ments
[ 87 ]
" meats lie, by the cufbos rotulomm and two
" jiiftices of the peace, and the clerk of the peace
" of the fame county or counties, or two of them
" at the leail, whereof the clerk of the peace to
*' be one." An a6l a] moft annually pafTcs, for /-
lowing further time for inrohnent of deeds and zvills
made bypapijisj and for the relief of protejian} piir-
chafers. As this adl of Geo. I. is of much uti-
lity and importance in the profecutioh of my pre-
fent refearches, I fhall premife fome general ob-
fervations upon its nature, tendency and opera-
tion, before I enter into the legal effeds of it, with
rcfpe6l to the law of inrolment.
This is one of the many penal laws now in force
againfl: the Roman catholic fubjedls of this coun-
try. It is a penal law, becaufe it was intended to
impofe a burthen upon the profeflbrs of that reli-
gion, to which their fellow fubjeds were not li-
able J and to deter them in future from offences, of
which they were then prcfumed guilty.
It is obvious, that before a man can give title
to another, he muft have a title himfelf : Nemo daty
quod non hahet. A man cannot have land himfelf,
if he be by law incapacitated to have or to hold it.
By our laws, there are but two methods of acquir-
ing landed property in this country : one by de-
fcent, when the law cafts the inheritance upon the
heir at law, after the death of the anceftor ; the other
by purchafe, which includes every acquiHtion of
land under a gift, deed or will. Now when this
afl of the 3d Geo. I. paffed, the legiflature could
not, or at leaft ought not, to have been ignorant
of the nth and lath of William III. c. 4, by
which every pcrfon educated in the popifh religion,
or profeffing the fame, is abfolutely " dijahled and
*■ made incapable to inherit or take by defcent-, devife^
" or limitation in pojfeffion^ reverfion cr remainder^
** anj lands, tenements or hereditaments within the
G 4 kingdom
[ 88 ]
" kingdom of England, dominion of Wales, and
" town of Berwick upon Tweed, and is alfo dij-
" abled and tnade incapable to purchafe either in his
*^ or her own name, or in the name of any other per-
*' Jon or perJonSi to his or her uje^ or in trufi for him
*' or her^ any manors., lands or profits out of lands ^
'^ tenements, rents, terms or hereditaments, within
** the kingdom of England, dominion of Wales,
" and town of Berwick upon Tweed, and that
*' all and fingular eflates, terms, and any other
'' interejis and profits whatfoever out of landsy
" from and after the faid loth day of April
" (viz. 1700) ynade, fuffered or done to or for the
" uje or behoof of anyfuch perfon or perfons, or upon
" any trujl or confidence mediately or immediately to or
" for the benefit or relief of any fuch perfon or perfons,
" fjall be utterly void and of none effect to all intents ^
*' conftru£lions and purpofes whatfoever.''
Can words be moie obvious, explicit, and con-
clufive ? If then a perfon educated in or profefling
the Roman catholic religion, can neither take land
by defcent nor purchafe, he cannot take it at all :
if he cannot take, he cannot hold; for prius efi
habere quam tenere. An alien may take land by
purchafe: but he cannot hold it, but for the bene-
fit of the crown. If he cannot have, he cannot
give. How abfurd and repugnant then is it to
ena6t, that no deed nor devife of land by a Roman
catholic, fhall be good and valid, unlefs inrolled
within fix months : for the confequcnce evidently
is, therefore, if Jo inrolled, it fonll be good and valid.
That this was the intent and fenfe of the legifla-
ture is fufficiently clear, from the conflant ufage of
inrolling all fuch deeds and wills, which have often
been controverted and eftablifhed as valid in the
courts of law and equity.
If this ad of -^d Geo. I. can operate at all, it
muft be by virtually repealing the nth and 12th
of Wil. and the Brcs in London, in the year 1780,
[ 89 ]
were very flagrant proofs, that the nth and lath
of Wil. III. till that time was generally iindcrftood
to be unrepealed and in full force. In the cafe of
Pelham and Fletcher (a), " a Papift alTigned to a
" proteftant for a full confideration : an ejcftment
" was brought againlt the affignee by a fubfcquent
*' mortgagee, who recovered by the difability of
" the firft mortgagee. (J;) All this appeared upon a
" bill brought in Chancery ; and my lord chancel-
'^ lor was of opinion, that ^ nwtgdge to a -papjl is
" void (c). But in this cafe, the afiignment to
" the proteftant, and the trial in cjeftment, were
" both before the 3d of Geo. I." (that is, the
ft"atute for inrolling the deeds of Papifts) " which
" were it otherwife, would it feems have made
" an alteration." And what other alteration, but
by removing the difability of the papift, and con-
fequently virtually repealing the nth and 12th
Wil. III. by which the difability was created.
'The Inconfijlency of thcfe two penal Laws,
If we take a complex view of thefi two a6ls,
the reprefentation will be faithfully this : A papiit,
who, by the aft of Wil. can neither take land by
defcent nor purchafe, may, by the a6t of Geo. I.
give or devife it away by deed or will inrolled.
What can more efficiently do away every effect
of the ftatute of Wil. III. than the 3d of Geo. I.
and all the fubfcquent a6ls, by which the lands
pofTefied by Catholics are fubjetSted to a double
landtax, and to a regiftry, and are almoft annually
affedled by the a6l for allowing further time for
inrolment of deeds and wills made by papijis, and
for the relief of proteftant pur chafers ?
(a) 3 New Abr. 709, Michaelmas 1729.
[6) For being, as apapill, difabled ta take the land hirafelf,
he could not alfign it to another.
(f) Viner recufant, 263.
It
[ 90 ]
It is feif-evidentj that lands which are pofTefled
by a Catholic, muft have been taicen by the pof-
feffor, either by defcent or purchafe ; for there is
no other nnode of taking lands : and by the a.d: of
Wil. III. he is made abfolutely incapable of taking
lands by defcent or purchafe. Either therefore the
a6l of Geo. I. with every fubfequent annual aft
relative to the fanme fubjeft, is an abfolute nullity,
as grounded upon an impoffible fuppofition, viz.
that a Catholic could take land by defcent or purchafe y
fince the paffuig of the act cf Wil. III. or thefe latter
afts completely do av/ay the eftefts of the aft of
"Wil. III. by enabling papifts to take land by def-
cent or purchafe. And I put thefe quefcions im-
partially to every man. Did the Roman Catholics
obtain any relief by the repeal of that part of King
"William's aft ? In what could that relief confift,
but in acquiring a capacity, v/hich they had not
before, of taking lands by defcent or purchafe ? It
is one amidft many ilriking inftances of the blind
and inconfiderate judgment of the public, when
we throw our eyes back to the ferments and riots,
that fet London in a blaze in the year 1780, mere-
ly becaufe the legiflature had repealed in exprefs
words, what had in faft been virtually repealed from
the year 17 17. For by this aft of repeal pafTed
in the 20th year of his prefent Majefly, a Roman
Catholic m.ay nov/ take land by defcent or pur-
chafe, which he may fettle, charge, mortgage, fell
or give away by deed or v/ill inrolled : and by the
3d Geo. I. he was enabled to fettle, charge,
mortgage, fell or give away his land, by deed or
will inrolled; v^hich he could not do without taking
the land : what then can a Roman Catholic do
more under the exprefs repeal of that part of King
William's aft by the 20th of his prefent Majefty,
than he before could under the virtual repeal of it
by the 3d Geo. I. ?
The inconfiftcncics of thefc penal ftatutes run to
an
[ 9- 1
an extent exceeding all credibility. For will any
man fuppofe it pofTible, that the wifdoni of theBri-
tifh legillature fhould declare in the fame fpirit and
intention, and by written laws, meant to rubfift
and be inforced together, and with a view and ex-
prels reference to each other (a), that a papilt not
having taken a particular oath prefcribed by the
30th of Charles II. is rendered abfolutely inca-
pable of taking land by defcent or purchafe (/^) :
and that every papift fhall take this very oath at the
age of twenty-one years or within fix months after
his coming hita pojjejfion of any lands or rents out of
lands ^ or fiiall regifter the eftate into the pojj'effion of
which he has come in the manner fpecified in the
a6i, under the penalty of forfeiting the fee-fimple
thereof; two thirds to the king, and one third to ,
the informer? Can folly and abfurdity be more
glaring ? Firft to require an oath to be taken at
the age of eighteen, and then to annex the inca-
pacity of taking the land to the noncompliance with
that requifition; and afterwards to require the fame
oath to be taken at the age of twenty-one, or fix
months after a perfon comes into poffefTion ofwhaf
he cannot take ; and to annex the forfeiture of that
very land, which he cannot take, to the king and in-
former, for his neglecting to regifter the fame after
he has taken it,
Inconveniences of the 3^ of Geo. I.
The act requires every deed and will to be In-
roiled within fix months from the date thereof, but
makes no provifion for either a deed or will execu-
ted "out of the nation, which frequently cannot by
poflibility be inrolled within the time limited : ic
dire6ts the deed to be inrolled, yet it neither ex-
prelTcs whether it fliall be inrolled by acknowledg-
(«) II & 12th Wil. 3d. i^b) 3 Geo. li^.
ment
[ 91 ]
ment or Jiat, or whether a copy of the inrolment
iliall be admitted in evidence. If efFe6l were to
be given to the aft of Wil. III. by really incapaci-
tating a Roman Catholic from taking lands by
defcent or pnrchafe ; thefe latter confiderations
could not afFeft them : but they are of infinite
confequence to proteftant purchafers ; for fup-
pofing, that under a deed or will executed by a ca-
tholic owner of land at Bengal, a Proteftant fhould
become intitled, to the prejudice of the heir at
law ; would it not be a hard cafe on one hand,
that an heir at law fhould be difinherited by an in-
ftrument, which under an exprefs a6l of parliament
is null and void j and on the other hand, that a
purchafer fliould be defeated in his rights, for the
omifTion of a condition impofed by a6t of parlia-
ment, which it was impoflible to perform ?
XJnconJiitutional Hardjhip of the 'Third of George the
Firfi.
An unprecedented hardlhip attends this a6l,
which mull upon confideration appear wholly un-
conftitutional ; for by it a man is compelled by a
public a6l recorded in court, to avow and confefs
himfelf guilty of a crime, which draws upon him
the very extreme rigor of the law, in the penalties
of premunire, outlawry, felony and treafon j to
which every one knows, that the profeiTion of the
Roman catholic religion fubjcfts its votaries. The
very acknowledgment of the necefllty of inrolling
a deed under this ftatute is ipfo faElo an avowal
of a perfon's being a Roman Catholic. Let us
hear the language and doftrine of our courts upon
this matter (^) : "A bill was brought, praying,
" that defendant mi^^ht difcover whether I. S,
*c>'
{a) 3 New. Abr, 799. Tiin. 12th G. 2. Smith v. Read.
" (under
[ 93 ]
*' (under whofe will the defendant claimed) was a
-•' papift or not. The defendant pleaded the ftatute
*' of the eleventh and twelfth William III. and the
*' Lord Chancellor was of opinion, that he was not
'* obliged to difcover ; that there is no rule better
" ellablifhed, than, that a man Jhall not be obliged
*'' to anJweVy to what may Jubje5l him to the ■penalty
*' of an act of -parliament y and there can be no doubt,
** but this is a penal law infliding difabilities or
*' incapacities. If a bill is brought againft the
" perfon for difcovery, whether he is a Papift or
'^ not, he is not bound to difcover; and where ia
" the difference between him and the perfon claim-
" ing under him ? Befides, what fways with me
" very much is the great inconvenience that would
" follow, fhould this plea be difallowed j we fhould
*' have nothing in this court but bills of difcovery,
" whether fuch and fuch perfons were Papifts or
" not, and nobody knows what confufion would
" follow, therefore the plea muft be allowed." Is
it not ftrange, that whilft the courts held fuch
doftrine, the iegiflature fhould contrive, by a fide
wind and indirect compulfion, to force a man to
anjwer to what may fubje£f him to the penalty of an
aci of parliament "i And there is no doubt but this is
a penal law.
Further huonveniences of the ^d of George I,
Befides the inconfiftencies and hardfhips of the
a6l, a very important inconveniency muft ever cer-
tainly attend the execution of it. It certainly
paffed to the end (as the preamble expreff(?s it)
that the ejtates of Papifts may be certainly known and
dif covered. Should not then the a6l have pre-
fcribed fome method of afcertaiping this crime of
popery, which renders a perfon incapable of taking
land by defcent or purchale ; or which requires the
Enrolment of aU their deeds and wills, and have
determined
[ 94 ]
determined a time (at leafV after the deatlis of the
parties) after which, the proof of this incapacity
or requifition fhoiild be precluded ? It will be
readily admitted, that the legidature, by making
knozvn and difcovered the ejlates of Papijls, and by
paffing annual a6ls for the relief of proteftant pur-
c!iafLrs, never could have meant or intended to
render the titles of Papifts (if a perfon unable to
take land by defcent or purchafe can have title) to
their lands dubious and uncertain. And it is clear
to demonftration, that every title muft be dubious
and uncertain, which depends upon a condition or
requifition, the neceflicy of which is created by fta-
tute, but of which no legal evidence can be pro-
cured or produced.
j^jup-pojed Cafe before the Repeal of any Part of the
A5i of King IVilUam III,
A conveyancer knows, that by one aft of par-
liament a Papift is incapacitated to take land either
by defcent or purchafe ; and that by another a<5t,
no deed nor vv^ill afFefting land made by a Papift
is good, unlefs inrolled vv'ithin fix months. An
abftraft of a title is brought to him to perufe on
behalf of a purchafcr of a Papift's land. The firft
thing to be attended to is, how this fa6l (which is
the ftigma guilt or crime of popery) can be
proved or eilabliflied ; for upon that, the whole
title hinges. The omi.Tion to inrol fome leading;
deed is ftated. How iliall a man after his death
be proved not to have conformed to the eftablillied
church, or to have dilTented from it ? And yec
if a perfon educated in or profeffing the popiOi re-
lifnon, be incapable of taking by defcent or pur-
chafe, (and confequently of tranfmiting, limiting,
or felling) ; or if the ad of William be rendered a
nullity, t)y the virtual repeal of the 3d Geo. I. or
if it lole its clTicacy from irs own abfurdity or in-
4 confiftcncy.
[ 95 ]
confiftency, or from the prefumption and tacit
agreement of the. nation collectively and indivi-
dually; or if the deed or will of a Papifl (who in
fpite of that act may have taken an eltate by de-
fcent or purchafe) be without inrolment an abfo-
Jute nullity ; how can fuch a title be approved of?
And if doubted, how can the ambiguity be done
away ? For the conformity or nonconformity with
the cftabliflicd church in this cafe creates the ca-
pacity or incapacity to take, and the obligation or
nonobligation to inrol ; upon which depends the
validity or nullity of the deed, and confequently
that of the title.
It is a fubje6t of aftonifhment, notwithftanding
the grofs, palpable and pointed contradiAion of
thefe acts, how catholic landed property has been
preferved in the very few, who ftili profefs the
tenets of that belief; and ftili more, how titles
to mortgagees and purchafers have been daily
made out, deduced through, and from perfons la-
bouring under the firft of all defe6ts in a title, viz.
an abfolute incapacity to take land either by de-
icent or purchafe.
Unintended Efecis of -repealing a Part of King IViU
ii:ms A^.
We are more to commend the liberality, than
admire the wifdom of the parliament, which re-
pealed that part of the aft of King William, that
difabled a Roman Catholic to take land by defcent
or purchafe. In refolving to remove the incapa-
city, they had not the precaution to provide againft
the inconfiilencies, which muft necelTarily attend
a partial alteration of the law. There cannot be
a doubt, but that the 3d of George I. is and was
intended to be a penal law, and a hardfhip impofed
upon the Roman Catholics; for the preamble
ftates the rcafon of its pafTing, viz. " in order that
*^ they
[ 96 ]
■" they may be deterred (if poflible) from the like
" offences for the future." It is well known, that
the inrolment of deeds is attended with an expence
for additional ftamps, for entering them on the
rolls, and for the fees of office ; another reafon,
why fuch deeds and wills by Catholics are inroUed
was and is " to render 'public and notcrious the
" ejlates of pafijis." Behold now the perverfion
of all thefe ends 1 A Protefbant piirchafes land
from a Papid, (and («) now a Papift can take by
defcent or purchafe, and therefore may fell :) the
purchafe deed is to be inrolled ; the expence of a
purchafe deed, without a fpecial contrary agree-
ment, is always upon the purchafer ; the Proteftant
then pays the expences, and the Proteftant's eftate
is rendered public and notorious -, and thus what-
ever hardfliip, expence or inconveniency, was in-
tended to be impofed upon the Roman Catholic,
is in fa£t transferred from him to the Proteftant :
and at prefent, as a Roman Catholic may legally
purchafe, the deed, by which the Proteftant con-
veys the land to him, needs not to be inrolled ;
and the Catholic may take under fuch a deed,
either without any fuch expence or notoriety of
title, to which the proteftant purchafer is fubjedt.
Experimental Effects of the -^d of George I.
Ill whatever light we view this ftstute, there
appear the moft cogent reafons for repealing it.
ft has however produced fome eftefts, whicli form
an experiment, how an univerfal inrolment aft
would tend to fimplifv and improve the law.
If we may be permitted to drop the ideas of in-
congruity and contradiction, which I have before
mentioned, refult from the ftatutes firll difabling>
then virtually enabling Papifts to take land, and
() 20 Geo. III.
laftly
r 97 ]
jaftly qualifying and admitting their pofltfUon and'
ieifin i we may argue from their pofleffing, pafling
and changing their lands from the year 17 17 to
the prefent day, in the fame manner, as if the i ith
and i2th of William had in faift never been made;
In this fuppofition, the tide of a Roman Catholic
to his land is ever more fure, clear and certain
from that period, than the title of a Proteftant i
^nd the ftatute gives the obvious reafons for it,
VIZ. the Catholic's eftate is thereby {a) certainly
known and dijcovered \ and for this reafon have their
lands in leveral inftances borne a higher price in
the market, than thofe of their neighbours ; nor
will this be found unreafonable, when we refiefbj
that the eftablifliment of a regiftery with all its
imperfections and inconveniences, certainly raifes
the value of land in the counties of York and
Middlefex above the rate, at which land of a fimi-
lar quality, will fell at in a neighbouring county^
and fecure a preference in landed fecurities given
for m.oney in thofe counties over others. The
truth of this daily appears from the advertifemqnt^
for fales and loans in the newfpapers.
The neceffary inference from thefe premifes is^
that by how much more clear the title of a land-
owner is to his eftate, of fo much more value is it
to a purchafer: and by how much more readily he
can raife money upon it, of fo much more value is
it to himfelf. The prices of land and of the funds
mud always keep pace with each other, and by
them the profperity and credit of the nation may
be always afccrtained. The difabling part of the
nth and 12th of William is now exprefsly re-
pealed by the coth of his prefent Majeily -, but tifl
that had been done, it was whimfically unaccount-
able to refled, that one ftatute, enafted as a penal
{a) Preamble of iRGeo. I. L z.
^ law
[ 93 1
law againfl the Ronnan Catholics, fhould have been
in praftice and in fa6l wholly difregarded, and ano-
ther moll ftriflly obfervf^d. For (cvj, if any, per-
fons ever thought of giving force to the aft of
William, or of negleding the requifition of ^^
of George I. {a).
The Decifions of the Courts upon the Aui of King
William.
Having faid fo much of the inconfiftency and
repugnancy of the two a6i:s of Will. III. and, Geo I.
it behoves me to prove my pofitions, by fnewing
the decifions of the courts upon them. I do it
with that fubmifTion and deference, which is due to
the authority of our fupremic courts: it m.uft be
remembered at the fame time, that thefe decifions
are, upon that part of an aft, which is now repeal-
ed ; and I quote them, with a view and intention
of proving, that another aft ought to be repealed.
He, who runs, may read the intent and meaning
of the 4th feftion of iith and i2th Will. III. c. 4.
" And be it alfo further enafted, by the authority
" aforefaid, that from and after the nine and twen-
** tieth day of September, which fhall be in the year
*' of our Lord one thoufand feven hundred, if any
*^ perfon educated in the popifh religion, or pro-
*^ felTing the fame, fliail not, within fix months, af-
*^ ter he or fhe fhall attain the age of eighteen years,
*^ take the oadis of allegiance and fupremacy, and
" alfo fubfcribe the declaration fet down and ex-
** prelTed in an aft of parliament made in the
" thirtieth year of the reign of the late King
[a) I find this obfervation fanflioned by Bifhop Burnet, in
the Hiftory of his own Time, Vol. II. p. 229 ; where, after let-
ting forth the inconfiftent fevcrity of this ad, he concludes in
thefc words, *' Ho this ail was not follo-vjid nor executed in any
'' Charles
[ 99 ]
" Charles II. intituled, Jn a5i f(xr the more effeclual
** prejerving the kings ferjm and govermneni, by
*' dijahlhig Papijis from Jitting in either hmje of
*^ parliament, to be by him or her made, repeated
" and fubfcribed in the courts of Cha^icery or
" King's Bench, or quarter fefllons of the county,
" where fuLh pcrfon fhall refide, every fuch perfon
" fhall, in refpect of him or hcrfelf only, and not
" to or in refpeft of any of his or her heirs or po-
" fterity, be difabled and m^.de incapable to inhe-
" rit, or take by defcent, d'^vife or limitation, in
" pofleflion, reverfion or remainder, any lands, te-
" nements or hereditament', within the kingdom
" of Fngland, dominion of Wales, or town of Ber-
" wick upon Tweed : And thit during the life of
" fuch pcrfon, or until he or fhe do take the faid
*' oaths, and make, repeat, and fubfcribe the faid
" declaration in manner as aforefaid, ih^. next of
" his or her kindred, which fhall be a Prcteftant,
" Ihall have and enjoy the faid lands, tenements
*' and hereditaments, without being accountable
** for the profits by him or her received during
" fuch enjoyment thereof, as aforefaid: but in cafe
" of any wilful wafte committed on the faid lands,
*^ tenements or hereditaments, by the perfon fo
*' having or enjoying the fame, or any other by
" his or her licence or authority, the party difabled,
" his or her executors and adminiftrators, fhall
" and may recover treble damages for the fame,
*' againft the perfon committing fuch wafte, his or
" her executors or adminiftrators, by aflion of debt
" in any of his Majcft 's courts of record at Weft-
" minfter j and that from and after the tenth day
" of April, which fhall be in the year of our Lord
one thoufand feven hundred, every Papift or
prrfon making profeiTion of the popilh religion
fliall be difabled, and is hereby made incapable
to purchafe either in his or her own name, or in
H 2 " the
[ 100 ]
*^ the name of any other perfon or perfons to his
" or her ufe, or in truft for him or her, any manors,
*' lands, profits out of lands, tenements, rents,
*' terms or hereditaments, within the kingdom of
" England, dominion of Wales, and town of Ber-
" wick upon Tweed; and that all and fingular
" eftates, terms, and any other interefts or profits
"^ whatfoever out of lands, from and after the faid
" tenth day of April, to be made, fuffered or done
" to or for the ufe or behoof of any fuch perfon
'' or perfons, or upon any truft or confidence, me-
" diately or immediately, to or for the benefit or
" relief of any fuch perfon or perfons, Ihall be ut-
" terly void and of none efFeft, to all intents, con^
" flruftions and purpofes whatfoever."
In confirmation of the obvious meaning and in-
'tent of this ftatute, which indubitably was to hin-
der Roman Catholics from taking or poffeffing
landed property, it has been folemnly determined
j^a), that " the perfons who were eighteen years
old at the time of making the ftatute of WiU
liam III. are within the intent and meaning,
though out of the letter of the aft ; for it is re-
markable, that this claufe extends only to the cafe,
where the papift is under the age of eighteen
years at the time, that the hnds come to him 5
but where the papift" is above eighteen years of
age when the land comes to him, lie is utterly
difabled to take, and the eftate is void " (^).
Devife to a papift, is a purchafe within this
a6t " (c): and it is fettled, " that either a de-
vife or Settlement to a perfon profefting the po-
pifli religion of above eighteen years and fix
months of age, is void, and the perfon not capa-,
faj 9 Mod. 3;.Tnn. 9. G. Carrick v. Errington.
(^) Wm. Rep. 254.. Trill. 1717. Vane v. Fletcher.
(<) 9 Mod. 170. Roper v. RatclifFc, in the Houfe cf Lords.
« ble
# ' [ lOI ]
" ble of taking: the acl intending utterly to difable
" th? papift of that age to take any new acqiii-
" fition, or what was not his ancient inheritance" [a).
The ftatute extends to trufts as well as legal eftates,
and to a term of years, or even for fix months, as
well as to a freehold or an inheritance, and " the
" truft of a term is as much within the a6l as the
" legal intereft of a term (<^)."
It appears, that thef^i decifions upon the incapa-
city of a papift acquiring any land by purchafe
either under a deed or will, arc ftriclly confonant
with the words, fpirit and meaning of the ad : but
what judgmient are we to form of the decifions
made upon the other words of the aft, l?e difahkd
and made incapable to inherit, or take by dejcent, de-
vije or li'mitation in pojfejfiony reverfion or remainder
any lands, Sec. ? The fingularity of thefe decifions
will fcarcely be credited.
To inherit or take by defcent is certainly to take
by operation of law, and not by the aft of the
party (e), '' Lord Dover being pofi^efi^ed of a
" long term for years, made his will, and his lady,
" who was a papift, executrix thereof And it was
^' refolved by LorI Chancellor, that notwithftand-
" ing the difabling aft of the nth and 12th of
*.^ Will. III. the term vefted abfolutely in her^ and
" this was not a purchafe within that aft. And
" he faid, that a papift may be a tenant in dower
" or by the curtefy; becaufe, in all thefe cafes, it
" is by operation of lazu, and not by the all of the
" party, that the eftate comes to him." It re-
quires fome (light knowledge of the law to per-
ceive the diftinftion between an executor taking a
chattel intereft (fuch as is a term of years) as exe-
cutor, and a perfon's taking the fame intereft under
{a) 2 Wm. Rep. 4, 5. {h) 9 Mod. 192.
\c) 3 New Ab. 799. cafe of Lord Dover's Will, and Vi'n.
tjitle Papift.
H 3 a de*
[ I02 ]
a devife or deed. Whatever a man inherits or
takes by defccit, m'jfi: be a freehold and inheri-
tance, not a chattel intireft or term for y.^ars. In
a ftatute fo highly penal, the Court very humanely
and liberally in this inilance, (if I may be allowed
the exprciTiwn) invented this evafion of the fcve-
rity cf the law : but why it flionld not adhere to t!ie
fpirit of the law, and go beyop.d its ilrifb letter,
in this inftance, as well as it did in declaring that
perfons of eighteen years and a half old at the
time of the makino- of the flatute, v/ere within the
intent and meaning, thori^h out of the letter of the
law, I cannot command ingenuity enough to ac-
count for. Common kpSc tells us, that the intent
and meaning of the aft was certainly to prevent a
papifb from acquiring any infeereft even for one
year in land : and fliall it be ferioufly prefumed,
that a proteftanr, polTeiTed of a leafehold eflate
worth j{. 50,000, fhall bylaw be enabled to leave
that to a papifl, by making him executor, which
he cannot give or leave him by deed or fpecific de-
vife? When a particular obje6t is intended to be
accompli fhed by the legiflature, it is derog:itory
from its dignity, that the courts of law fiiouid in-
vent and countenance fuch fubterfuges and evafions
of its intended effc6ls. The virtual repeal of the
I ith and i 2di of Will. III. by the 3d Geo. I. and
its exprefs repeal by the 20th of his prefent Ma-
jefty juRify this language.
The reafon a]ledi>ed for this determination, viz.
that ii is hy operation of lawy and not by any ati
Of the party i that the eftate ccmes to him, every
body rnuft perceive, applies moil: emphatically to
every defcent call by law, and would therefore do
away the firft and chief part of this very flatute,
which ili fables a papifl" to inherit or take by defcent,^
devife or limitation y for it is by operation of law,
;inil not by any a6t of the party, that an eftate
[ I07 1
comes to an heir, who takcb by dcfcent, to a de-
vifee, who takes under a will, and to a piirchafer
who tak''s by limitation under a deed.
But the fub; quent decifions upon thefe words
of the acl, he dijchled and made incapable to take by
dejccnt^ devife cr limtation^ are {till more wonderful,
than tnofe, which we have already quoted (<^).
" Viie heir at lav/, though a Papift, is capable to
*' take the inheritance ; for it is in him, though the
" nest Protevtant of kin hath the pernancy of the
" profits, till the other becomes a PruLcftant ; nor
*^ fh.-.ll the next remainder-man take immediately,
" till after the death of the Papiih" Be it ob-
ferved, how inconfillent and contradiftory are the
foregoing and the fubfequent determinations {b),
** Per Cur. 9 Mod. 34, Trin. 9. G. in the cafe of
*^ Carrick v. Errington cited there, as fettled in the
** cafe of the Duchefs of Hamilton;,'' Lord :Chan-
cellor King held, " That the remainder mould take
*^ efFetl prefently, in the fame manner, as if a re-
*' mainder were lim.ited to a monk for life, or to
" one that refufes to take, or if fuch remainder-
" man had been dead, and no fuch limitation had
" been."
I will end my obfervations upon this fiatute, and
the decifions upon it, with the following repetition :
^hat the fiatute extends to trufis as luell as legal
efiates. Now obferve with attonifhment how the
courts judge of this matter (^). Per Pratt, Ch.
Jufiice, "If Papifts take conveyances to their
" own truilees, and if it be undifcovered, all is
" well ; or if it be difcovered, the conveyance, it
*' is true, is void by the a6tj but then it revefbs
" again in the firil owner or truflees." I cannot
{a) 9 Mod. 34 Trin. 9 Geo. Carrick v. Errington, and Roper
and Ratcliff, ubi fupra.
(/>) 2 Wm. Rep, 362. Trin. 1726, Carrick v. Errington.
{() 9 Med. 194. Roper v. Ratcliif.
H 4 difcover
[ 104 ]
difcover any words in the aft, which cither impli-
citly or explicitly import, that tlie difability of a
Papid taking a truft eftate, depends upon the difr-
covery of its being a popifli truft. The non-dtfco-'
njery of the cejluy que truft, certainly never can give
validity to a conveyance, which was void ab initio ;
nor can there be a revefting, without a divelling:
and nothing can divefc by a conveyance, but what
thercbv moves out of the grantor : but here the
conveyance was void, and therefore no efFe£l cant
be given to it; and confequently nothing could
thereby have moved out of the grantor. Again (^),
" the a6l of nth and 12th Will. III. is a bare
"^ difability ; it creates only a difability, but makes
*' no forfeiture ; it prevents a veiling, but divefts
f' nothing that is vcfted."
Another curious doftrine has been eftablifhed by
the courts, which appears upon reflecElion equally
incompatible with the ftatute, which incapacitates
a papift to inherit or take land by defcenty devije or
limitation.
(b) *' The word furchafe in this ftatute is only
'^ a modification of the eftate, and iliall not be
*' taken in the full extent of the word ; for thofe
" purchafcs are intended only by the ftatute, by
'' which papifts enlarge and extend their landed
" intereft, and not where by deeds of fettlement,
*^ the ancient family eftate is new modelled, with-
^^ out making any new acquifition; fo that even
*' at this day, a purc'iafe by Umitaticn in a fettle-
^' ment, or by dcvife to a papift under the age of
'' eighteen years, is good, fo as fuch papift, within
" fix months after he comes to that age, conform
** and take the oaths, &c, otherwife he lofes the
f' pernancy of the proiits during his life only."
(/?) 9 Mod. 199. 200.
\b) ^ iVjoJ. j»bo. Hil. 5 G. I. Earl of Dcrwentwater's cafe.
[ 105 ]
The inconPiflencies of this a61: and of the decl-
fiorrs upon ir, will appear Icfs firange, v/hen we
attend to the account which Bifhop Burnet gives
of its pafTing. (<^) " Thofe who brought tliis into
" the Houfe of Commons, hoped, that the court
" would have oppofed it ; but the court prom.oted
*^ the bill ; fo when the party faw their miftake,
" they feemed wilhng to let the bill fall; and when
*' that could not be done, they clogged it with
*^ many fevere and fome unreafonable claufes, hop-
" ing that the lords would not pafs the aft ; and
*^ it was faid, that if the lords Ihould make the
" leall alteration in it, they in the Houfe of Com-
*^ mons, who had ftt it on, were refolved to let it
" lie on their table, when it fliould be fent back to
*^ them. Many lords, who fecretly favoured pa-
" pifts, on the Jacobite account, did for this very
" reafon move for feveral alterations; fome of
" thefe importing a greater feverity ; but the zeal
" againft popery was fuch in that houfe, that the
'^ bill paffed without any amendment, and it had
*' the royal alTent."
Of InroUing Deeds hy a Judge* s Fiat.
Before I leave this fubjed, I fliall Hightly touch
upon a point of praftice, which has attvnded the
execution of this a6l of the 3d George I. It has
been the general ufage to inrol ail deeds under
this aft, not by acknowledgment of the execution
by any of the parties to the deed, but by what is
called a judge's fiat; {a) which in general is a
{^) Hiilory of his own Time, 2d vol. p. 229.
(/■) The Fiat is nothing more, than the fignature of a judge
to the following fuperfcription on the face of the deed. Lef
this deed be air oiled in the court nf fv.rfuant to ike Jia-
'futejlbis day of 178 A. B. '
fliort
[ io6 ]
iliort order or warrant of fome judge, for making
out and alJowing an^ certain proccfs, &;c.
I have not been able ro trace in the books the
fainted idea of a deed being inroUed under a judge's
fiat ; fuch however has been the general praftice,
which muft appear truly lurprifrng^, v/hen wc throw
back our rccolleftion, to what is faid (in page 79
viz.) that the necejfity of an ackywzvledgment was
owin? to the common law, which as it would not
admit of the voluntary inrolnnent of a deed, even
for fafe cuftody, without acknowledgment, much
Icfs v/ould it permit a deed to be inrolled by virtue
of a flatute v.'ithout acknowledgment, or fomething
equivalent unto it. Ir cannot be queftioned whe-
ther lefs formality and authority be required for the
voluntary inrolment of a deed for fafe cuftody, or
for the requifitc inrolment of a deed under a com-
puifory ftatute. Upon what ground of authority
then did the judges introduce and continue to iffue
tXit^K: fiats for inrolmrnt ? Ir would be too hazard-
ous to aiferr., that out of many thoufand deeds in-
rolled under /i3/j, not one is validly inrojled.
We have k('\^i that th'. acknowledgment of a deed
to be inrolled under the ftatute of Henry VIII. is
previoufly r^quifite for its inrolment, not by virtue
of that fracuti. , but of the common law, for the aft
fays nodiing of acknowledgment} ; lb the ftatute
of George I. is equally fiient as to the mode of
inrolment. Either then a judge hath pov\^er to
iffue a warrant Tor inrolmerit b} fiat^ or he has not.
If he hath power, it muft be either by the prero- '
gativc of his office, or by written law. There is no
mention made in any ftatute, which hath come
under my cognizance, of a judge's /<^/ for this pur-
pofe. If it be by common law or prerogative of
office, it is paramount to the ftatute of Henry VIII.
but before that ftatute, there was not known any
diftindion of inrolled deeds j that ftatute required
the
i 107 ]
the inroiment of a particular ipecies of deed ; but
the mode of inrolling that particular fpccics, did
not vary from the mode of inrolling any other
fpecies of deed. The a6l diredled no variation in
this mode. The fame r^afoning holds to tlii oiv^-
fent day. The common law cannot be altered,
but by an exprefs ftatute ; the judge's prtrogarive
or power not having been extended or curtiiled,
as to any particular fpecies of de^rd, it .3 one and
the iamc over all. Upon v/hat ground then, do
they aflume a power co ifflie/'-'j for inrolling; deeds
of Roman Catholics under liie ftatute of Gcoro-e
I. which they difavow and difclaim for inrolling
bargains and iaies under the ftatute of H^nry VI 11.
If this power arifes by the common law, and the
conimon law has never been altered by itiiutej the
judges certainly have e<^ual power in both cafes.
If they can ifllie a fat for inrolling a deed in one,
they can in every inftance. For what is the inroi-
ment of a deed ? It is the a6l of a deed becoming
either recorded in court, or a record of the court,
according to what has been faid above; when it
has been entered or ingrofled upon a roil or fcroll
of parchment, fuch ingroffed copy fhall not be re-
corded in the court, but by fome warrant of a judge
of the court, in which it is intended to be inrolled.
This v/arrant is faid in the books to be the ac-
knowledgment of the deed, to Vv^hich the judge figns
his name : [a) but as the deed cannot be entered
or recorded in the court without a judge's name,
fo I muft prefume, that every deed, to which a
judge has figned his name by way of diredlion,
order, warrant, authority, confent or knowledge for
{a) The form of an acknowledgment is — T/jo' execution of
this deed loas acknoKvleagcd by A. B. a party thereto before
fne, and luas by him ddfred to be inrolled in the court of '
A. B.
its
[ io8 ]
its inrolment, muft after that, neccflarily be en-
tered or admitted as a record, by the officers of the
court. They are bound by the judge's orders,
which are to them mandatory and compulfive;
the party, which is bound to procure the deed to
be inroiied, can do no more, than to procure from a
judo-e a direction, warrant, authority or order to
the ofHcer, to inrol the deed : the nature and
mode of this direction, warrant, authority or order,
muft be immaterial to the ofHcer and party ; the
latter is bound to comply with the requifition of
the fbatute, which obliges him to inrol the deed,
and the former will not, as he ought not, record
any deed v/ithout the fanftion of a judge's name j
and wherever a judge's direction, warrant, autho-
rity or order appears upon a deed, the officer can-
not refufe to record it, unlefs for a reafon para-
mount to the authority of a judge, viz. for a par-
liamentary reafon ; iuch for inflance as is the want
of a proper ftamp. In fuch cafe, although a deed
be acknowledged or hath a jiat^ yet if it be not
properly ftampt for inrolment, the officer will re-
fufe to inrol it ; yet if he Ihould have recorded it,
1 know of no provifion in any a6l relative to the
iubjed, which invalidates the deed, after it hath
been once recorded, or that makes the deficiency
of ftamps prevent its becoming a record of the
court. For ftamps are inripofed by afts of par-
liament i nothing therefore relative thereunto can
alter the common law, but by exprefs words, {^d)
" Statutes are not prefumed to make any alteration
'f in the common law, further or otherwifc, than
<^ the ad does exprcfsly declare." The nature of
the deed remains, as it was at common law, which
was paramount and independant of the duty upon
ilamps,
{a) II Mod. 150.
Upon
[ 109 ]
Upon full and mature confideration of this fub-
je6l, I cannot help concluding my opinion, that if
a judge do fign 2. fiat for the inrolment of a bargain
and (ale, which is required to be inrolled by the
acl of Henry VIII. and it be ingrofied upon pro-
per (lamps ; and after that, it be recorded in the
court, it hath anfwered the intent of the ftatute,
which requires it to be inrolled. When I fay thus
much, I am alfo of opinion that in no cafe a judge-
fhould ever fign a fiat for inrolment, without the
acknowledgment of that party to the deed, whofe
execution of it gives it efficacy and effedl. C^)
In the cafe o'i Abjolom and Anderton^ the acknow-
ledgment was by the bargainors, viz. the mafters
and chaplains of the Savoy, before a mafter in
Chancery, who went dov/n for the purpofc to their
chapter houfe : fo that if the parties had been
common perfons, every thing was perfeftly right ;
but it being the cafe of a body corporate, who can-
not do folem.n a6ls by parole, nor otherwife than
under their com.mon feal ; a queflion arofe upon
the validity of the inrolment. And it was agreed,
that the indenture being once inrolled-, it "duas not ma-
terial by -what means ^ but was good being done.
When it is confidered, that the copy of any in-
rolment may be read in evidence, and that a deed
ought not to be inrolled without the acknowledg-
ment of a party to it, and that an acknowledgment
binds the acknowledging party, and all claiming
under him ; when we alfo refledt that an acknow-
ledgment of a deed, is but an avowal by the party,
that the deed to be inrolled is his own aift and deed,
and that it is his wiih and defire, that it be rendered
notorious and perpetuated j I flatter m.yfelf, that it
will be the conclufion of all my readers, that the
ioventions and devifes of introducing nominal par-
{a) 3 Lev. 84.
ties
[ "O ]
ties to acknowledge deeds, and figning fiats for
their inrolmenr, are but evafions or perverfions of
the real intent and purpofe of inrolling deeds j and
that conft^quently therefore, one fixt, confiftent and
cfFeftual mode of inrolling deeds by the acknow-
ledgment of the granting or operating party to the
deed, ought to be eftabiifned, as it is provided
for in the draft of the bill annexed hereunto.
Nothing can fo folidly confirm the do6trine I
have attempted to eftablifh, as to confider the
effefts produced by the inrolment. For it hath
been holden, {a) that until the deed be inroUed,
the efbate and freehold is in the bargainor, and no-
thing pafies from him. So in Billinghams cafe ;
" bargainee before inrolment, bargains and felJs to
'• another, and afterwards the firft deed is inrolled,
" and after that the fccond : yet held, that nothing
" palled, for he had not any eftate in him at the
*' time of the bargain and fale to give to a ftran-
" ger." As therefore the transfer of the land is the
a6l of the bargainor, and the acknowledgment and
inrolment of the indenture is but the continuation
and completion of that a6l of transfer, it certainly
ought ro be done by the bar'gainor. And for this
obvious reafon was it faid by Dyer, that a bargainor
is eftopped by the inrolment from pleading either
nonage or durefs, or any matter, which difproves
the deed and defiroys it.
Of the Inrohnent of Wills.
Whatever objcftions might be raifed againfl in-
rolling every deed aftefting land ; yet confident I
am, that the reafons, which I am about to adduce,
will prove the indifpenfible ncccfTity of inrolling all
wills and devifes of land, in order to render them
{a) Pvloore 42.
■j- notorious.
[ "I ]
notorious, public, perpetual and authentic. It
is no fmall fatisfaction to find \vy opinion fiipport-
ed by To great a man as Sir Matthew Hal., (^a)
'Mt were well, if fome greater foiemnity were re-
" quired by law in wills, whereby lands are de-
" vifed : for ever fince the ftatute of 34 Hen. 8.
" more queftions, not only of law, touching the
" conftru61:ions of wills, but alfo of fafts, arife,
" than in any five general titles or concerns of lands
" befides." To fee and perfeftly comprehend the
law, nothing is fo efFeftual, as to trace it to its
origin : to acquire an intuitive knowledge of an
effe(5l:, we fliould not be ignorant of the caufe.
The power, which individuals in this country
have been permitted to enjoy, of difpofmg of their
pofieffions even after death, feems a l-ways' to have
extended without interruption to perlbnal property :
fuch as is money, goods, chattels, &c. but as to
land, although the like power exifted, and was cxer-
cifed by our Saxon anceftors, yet from the Norman
conquell, to the days of Henry VIII. this power
had ceafed or run into defuetude, and exifted no
longer, but by private cuftom in fome manors,
boroughs and corporations.
The inconveniency of lands not being devifeable
was at lengrh felt in a cornmercial country; and by
the 3 2d Hen. VIII. c. i. every one was enabled to
devife all his lands holden in foccage, and two third
parts of his lands holden by knighrs fervice : and
by 1 2 Car. 11. c. 3c. lee. i. all tenures are turned
into free and common ioccage ; lb that at prefent
all lands whatfocver are devifeable by llatute.
Notwithftandingr this a6l of Henrv VII i. enablino;
individuals to devife their lands in the manner be-
fore mentioned ; we find that in the days of Car. II.
(a) The before-mentioned pamphlet upon a general regiflry.
when
when after the then late revolution and trouble's, the
nation began to enjoy peace and quiet, and com-
manded fome cool leifure to look forwards towards
quieting and fettling their titles to their pofleflionSi
(for at that time almoft every man flood in abfolute
need of it) ; they palfed, an a^ for the -prevention of
frauds and perjuriesy commonly called the ftatute
of frauds : (^) and amongft other remedies admi-'
niftered by that a6l, was that of adding " greater
" foiemnity and notoriety to the publication of all
" devifes and bequefts of any lands or tenements,
*' devifeable either by force of the ilatute of wills,
*^ or by this ftatute, or by force of the cuftom of
*^ Kent or the cuftom of any borough or any other
" particular cuftom, which (from the 24th June
*^ 1676) it was enabled, fhould be in writing,
*' and figned by the party fo devifing the fame, or
*' by fome other perfon in hir, prefence, or by his
*' exprefs direflions, and ftiould be attefted and
" fubfcribed in the prefence of, and by his exprefs
" diredlion, and fhould be attefted and fubfcribed
" in the prefence of the faid devifor by three or
*^ four credible witnefles, or elfe they fhould be
" utterly void and of none effe6l." And the aft
provided alfo for the fame degree of notoriety and
publicity in cancelling, altering and revoking fuch
devifes and bequefts; and {ot ^^ amendment of the
law in that particular ^ enafted ; that from thence-'
forth, " any eftate pour auter vie fhould be devife-
*^ able by a will in writing, figned by the party fo
" devifing the fame, or by fome other perfon in his
*' prefence, and by his exprefs directions attefted
" and fubfcribed in the- prefence of the devifor, by
*' three or nu^re witnefles," &c.
Vv' hoevtr rcfleds one moment upon thefe par-
(«) 29 Car. 2. c. 3.
liamentary
[ "3 ]
llamentary provifions for the additional folemnity
and publicity of landed devifes, more than in w'ills
of perfonal property, cannot hefitate to conclude,
that there is more reafon alfo for fuch wills being
perpetuated and preferved open to infpeftion, than
the wills of perfonal property. A will moreover,
by which land is devifed, forms the moft material
part of the title to the land deviled ; and in every
alienation or charge or fettlement of it, it will ever
be proper to trace and prove the title, at leaft for
fixty years back. Nothing of this, is applicable to
the bequeft of perfonal goods and chattels.
Gf the Spiritual or Ecclejiaftical Courts.
It is foreign from my purpofe to trace and ac-
count for the introduftion of any legal jurifditftioa
or tribunal into this country, which is not govern-
ed and regulated by the municipal law of the land.
For in fidt, the civil law (by which is meant the
Roman or Jullinian code) is as foreign and diftindt
from the municipal law of this country, as the Tal-
mud or the Coran.
At a time, when the clergy had monopolized all
literature and knowledge, it was an eafy matter for
them to extend that fuperiority, together with what
their fpiritual character and fundlions gave them,
over generations more docile in faith and pliant
to credulity, than the prefent, to a dominion, fway
or influence over the temporalties of their flocks.
From the right, which the ordinaries acquired to
diftribute and apply the perfonal goods of intellates
pro Jalute animarum defunEiorum according to the
doftrine of thofe days, that the perfons, who had
the charge and care of men's fouls in their life-
time, were the moft proper to fee to the applica-
tion of their property after death, many abufes
gradually crept into this authority and power.
I Such
[ IH ]
Such ever has been, and fuch ever will be the
cafe, where the fpiritual povv^er alTumes, or even
receives any temporal iurirdi6lion. For if any
fpiritual authority does exift, it is in its nature ef-
fentially diftin6l from and independant of all hu-
man inflitution : and from the inftant, that it raifes
itfelf upon any other bafis, than that of the divine
gift or mifTion, it perverts its origin and inflitu-
tion, and becomes of courfe much more liable,
from an heterogeneous principle, to all forts of
abufes, than if it were a mere temporal power or
jurifdiftion.
How the Right of Adm'inijiratton -probably came to
the Ordinary.
It is no uncommon thing at the clofe of life,
that a perfon repenting of his fins, may from a jud
principle of reilitution or reparatiota, wifli to have
a certain fum of money applied in a fecret manner,
in order to avoid fcandal or difgrace ; and in thoftf.
countries, where auricular confefTion is in ufe (as
it then was in England) fuch applications are ufu-
ally left to be made by the fpiritual diredor of the
penitent, wlio may probably have fuggcfted the
propriety, or infilled upon the nccefilty of them. It
is alfo frequent (amongfl thofe, who hold, that there
is in the next life a place of temporary punifliment,
where we are purified from our flighter failings,
which have not deferved the eternal torments of
hell, and that the prayers and intercefTions of the
living are an inducement to the mercy of Almighty
God, to alleviate and abbreviate their pains and
punilliments) to make donations to particular
churches and particular perfons, in order that cer-
tain facrifices and prayers may be offered up to Al-
mighty God with this view, for the repofe of their
fouls :
t "5 ]
fouls t as we read in the books of the Macca-
bees (a). " He making a gathering fent 1 2000
" drachms of filver to Jerufalem, to have facrifice
*' offered for the fins of the dead, well and right-
" eoufly thinking of the refurreftion : for unlefs
" he hoped, that they who were flain, fhould rife
*^ again, it would feem fuperfluous and vain to
" pray for the dead. It is therefore a holy and
" healthful cogitation to pray for the dead, that
" they may be loofcd from their fins." Thus as in
thofe days, (viz. 200 years before the coming of
ChrJfl) the money, which was thought proper to
be applied to this purpofe, was fent to the priefts
of the temple, fo probably was it, in latter times,
depofited in like manner with the prieits of the new
law : and fo by degrees, not only that part of the
property of the dcceafed, which was devoted to
thefe purpofes, was often veiled in the ordinary,
but the whole perional eftate became veiled in him,
with an expreffed or implied injun<5lion and obliga-
tion of applying the refidue or remainder (if anv)
unto or amongft lae relations of the deceafed.
This appears to me to have been the original fpirit
and intention of the ordinary's power in this re-
fpe(fl. But a mixture of fpiritual and temporal
power will never blend properly together.
It is very evident, that abufes of this right and
power crept in at a very early period : for in the
year 1285 (^) the legiflature takes notice, that
" whereas after the death^of a perfon dying in-
" teftate and in debt to feveral, the goods come to
" the ordinary to be difpojed (behold here the ufage,
{ci) 2 Mac. XII. 43. Although thefe books are holden to
be apocrypha, yet they are read in the church of England
for example of Ife and ivfruSlioti of manners (Art. IV.) which
would not be, if they did not contain true and authentic
hillory.
[b) ii Ed. I. c. 19.
I 2 into
[ "6 ]
into which the abufe had crept, and then follows
the remedy) " the ordinary from henceforth fhall
" be bound to anfvver the debts, as far forth as the
" goods of the dead will extend, in the fame man-
" ner as his executors would have been bounden,
" if he had made a will."
'^he Spiritual Courts had not the original Cognizance
of mils.
By the ancient Britifh laws, the probate and iu-
rifdiclion of wills did originally (as it always ought)
belong to the temporal courts : for we find in
Glanvill, the earlieft writer and moft authentic
quoter of the common law (^), that there is a ix)rit,
which lies at common law, to recover a legacy.
And in the regifter there appears to be a writ de
rationahili parte. It was about the time of Richard
the 2>^y that wills were proved in the fpiritual
courts {b). In all other nations they are proved in
the temporal courts. And in many places in Eng-
land, even at this day, the lords of manors have
the probate of wills (f) : and Tremayle, who was
then king's ferjeant, told the Court, that he was
fleward of feveral manors in his county, where
both freehold and copyhold tenants proved their
wills before him in the courts baron ; which par-
ticular cufloms were (as before obferved) a reten-
tion or rclid of the ancient general law or ufage.
I^inwood, who was dean of the Arches, and wrote
about the time of Hen. VI. doth confefs, that the
probate of wills did belong to the ordinaries, non.
de commitni jure, but by cuftom. And archbifliop
Parker pubiiflied a book in 1573, in which he fays
(«) Lib. 6. c. 6, 7.
{b) Fitz. Tcibm. 4.
Ic) NcHou lux TclUmentaria, p. 462. Henfloe^s cafe,
i^, Kcp. 3i>.
mc
[ "7 ]
ner. ullam hahehant epi/copi authoritate^n, pvcfter earn
quam a rege acceptam refcrehant ; tejlamenla pro-
bandi authoritatem non hahebanty nee adminifirationis
poteflatem cuique delegare non pot er ant (^a).
Anciently (/-), upon the death of an inteftate,
the Ton was intitled to have the heriots due to him,
which were appointed by law, that by the lord's
advice or judgment the intejlate' s goods be divided
amongjl his wife and children and the next of kin^
according as to every one of them cf right belongs.
And it appears clearly conclufive from the words
of the laws of Edw, the Confellor, that the ordi-
nary in thofe days, had nothing to do with the ad-
miniftration or diilribution of goods of the in-
tefbate (<:). Ilabeant h^rede^ ejus pecuniam et ter-
ra'm ejus fine aliqud diminutione^ et re£le dividant
inter Je \ for if this right of the heir to the goods
and land had not been under the ufual temporal
jurifdidlion of the common law, it would certainly
have been mentioned to be under fome other jurif-
di6lion. And Mr. Selden fays exprefsly, " that
*' until King John's time, it feems the jurifdic-
** tion over the inteftate*s goods, was as of other
" inheritances alfo, in the temporal courts \ yet no
**^ fufficient teftimony is found to prove it exprefsly :
*' only when the common laws of thofe times fpeak
" of inteftates, they determined the fuccefTion by
" like divilion, as thofe of the Saxon times. In
" certain laws attributed to Will, the Firft (^),
" we read, Si home mouriifi fans devije^ ft departent
*' les infants^ lerite inter Je per ovell. And after, in
" Henry I. laws {e\ Si quis baronum vel hominum
{n) Lambert, fol. 167. Selden, ftol. 1S4.
{b) Canut. leg. c. 68, & Selden of the difpofition or ad-
miniltration of inteftates goods, p. 15.
{c) Leg. Ed. Conf. cap. de Heretoch. of Croland.
(^) MS. in the Cotton lib. attributed to Ingulph.
(f) Matthew Paris.
I 3 " nmrum
[ n« ]
*^' meorum pneventuSy vel armis vel infirmitatei pecu'
*^ niam Juam 7:ec aederit^ nee dare dijpcfuerit^ uxor
*' Jua five liberi aut prrentes et legitimi homines Jut
*' pro animd ejus earn dividanf, ftcut eis melius vtfum
*' fuerit. Here is the firft mention, as I remem-
*^ ber, of any thing occurring in our laws, or hif-
" tories of the difpofitions of the inteftate's goods,
" pro animd ejus : which indeed might have been
*' fitly fubjedled to the view at leaft of the church.
" But no mention as yet of any ccclefiaftical power,
" that tends that way ; I rather think, that there-
*' fore no ufe or practice v/as of adminiftration
*' committed, direction given, or meddling with
*' the goods by the ordinaries : but all was by
*' friends or kindred, jiixta con/ilium dijcretonim vi~
" rormuy &c.
" Neither doth that of Glanvill, which was writ-
" ten under Henry II, tell us of any thing of the
*' ordinaries power in this cafe, although it hath
*^ exprefs mention of teftaments, and the churches
" jurifdiftion of them : indeed we there find (a) that
*' if no executor be named, then pojfunt propinqui
** et conjanguinei tejintoris take upon them the
" executorlhip, and fue in the king's court againll
*^ fuch, as hinder the due payment of legacies,
*' which alfo agrees well enough with that before
*^ cited out of the laws of Henry 1."
The firfl interference of the church, in the ap-
plication of the goods of inteftates, that I can
trace, is in the charter granted or m^ade by King
John in the 17th year of his reign, at Runny-
mead {b) : Si quis liber homo inteftatus decejj'erity
(alalia Jua per maims propin quorum parentum et ami-
coru'rn Juorum per vijum ecclefice dijlribuantur^ Jalvis
{a) Glanv. lib. 7. cap. 6.
{b) 111 a MS. prelerved by Matt. Par. Roger of Wendover,
and Tho. Rudman.
mi
J
[ "9 ]
uni cuique dehitisy qua defunulus eis dchehat. Thefe
words -per vijum ecclefict cannot in any manner im-
port a judicial or any other power in the church :
they feem to import a fort of teftiinony, or noto-
riety only of its being done in the face of the
church, or before the ordinary, as it is fiid in writs
of fummons fer vifum proboru?n legalitim hominuniy
tr as Mr. Selden underftands it, by the dire^ion
and advice of the ordinary.
We are to obferve, that by this charter the ad-
minifcration and diftribution of the goods of the
inteftate were diredled to be made only by the next
of kin and the friends of the deceafed, per maniis
propinquorum parent urn et amicorum Jiiorum : and yet
very foon afterwards we may trace the interference
of the ordinaries gaining gradual ground towards
that abfolute dominion, pov/cr and authority, which
they afterwards exercifed without controul. For
we read in Bra6lon, who was a judge in the reign
of Henry 3d (^), " Si liber homo intejlatus et fubit'o
^^ decejferit, dominus Juus nil intromit tat de bonis de-
" fiin^ij nifi de hoc tantum quod ad ipjum pertiniierit
'* (Jcilicet quod habeatjiium heriott) Jed ad ecclefiam
" et amicos pertinebit executio bonorum,''
The ordinaries, foon after they had acquired this
joint power with the next of kin, foon found means
to exclude the latter from any participation, what-
Ibever in the adminillration and diilriburion of the
goods of inteftates : for in the 42d year of the reign
of the faid King Henry the 3d, we read of an ar-
ticle granted in the fynod of London {})) : " Idem
"^ quod mortuo laico fine teflamentOy non capiantur
*' bona ipfius in 7nanus dominorum, Sed inde Jolvan'
" tur debit a ipfius ^ et reftdua in ufils fdiorum, fervo*
{d) Bradlon, lib. 2. de acq. rer. clom. c. 26, feft. 2.
(^) In annal. Bartomenfis con. pernes. V. cl. Thorm. Allen
Oxon. MS. A, 1257.
I 4 *' rum
[ 120 ]
" rum et proximorum indigentium, pro Jalute anima;
. '^ defiin^i^ in pios ujus per or dinar ios committantur,
*' mft quateniis fiierit domino Juo obligatus.'' It is
curious to obferve the gradation of this ufurped or
acquired power of the ordinaries ; firft, as we have
feen, they were called in as witnefles or confulted
as advifers ; then they became joint executors or
adminiftrators ; then lole adminiftrators and diftri-
butors of the goods of the inteilates : but ftill the
pious ujes^ to which they pretended to apply them,
were the payment of debts and the fuccour and re-
lief of the children and needy relations of the de-
ceafed. Nor did the abufes of this ufurped power
cenfe, till the ordinaries had acquired an arbitrary
and difcretionary right or authority of diftributing
and difpofing of all the goods of the inteftates. The
different gradations of this ufurped power are the
^learefl proofs of its introdu6lion and eftablifhment,
upon the decline and abolition of the ancient laws
and cuftoms of the realm.
Lands were formerly devijeable.
It appears both from records and hiftory, that
in the days of our Saxon anceftors, goods (or per-
ional eflate) as well as lands paffed by defcent ;
and the lord of the fee was in the place of a judge,
to fee upon the death of any of his tenants, that
there Ihould be an equality in the diftribution, as
well of the goods, as of the lands amongft the chil-
dren and next of kin : for if there were children,
they excluded all the kindred of a more remote de-
gree, and therefore the rule was, Si liberi nonjunty
proximus gradus in pojfejfione fratrcs^ patruiy avun-
culiy Sec.
The cuftom of Gavel Kind, which was retained
all through Kent, and fubfifts even to this day in
fome parts of tliat county, is nothing more, than a
relid:
[ •" ]
relift of the ancient common law, according to
that, Si qias intejiatus ohierity liber i ejus h credit at em
^equaliter dividant (a).
This alfo clearly proves the ancient law of de-
vifing land ; for inteftacy is not fpoken of, where
there is not a cuftom or ufage of willing.
^be Norman Feudal Syjtem incompatible with the
Power of devifing Landsy or
give him their advice and
three weeks in his
[ 122 ]
or a price paid to the lord for the land. The feu-
dal tenants were bound moreover to the defence of
their lord's perfon in the field, and to attend and
connfel once at lead in
in nis courts. Strength of body and
ability of mind v/ere therefore requifite, to render
thefe fervices properly and duly to the lord. And
in this fyftem, it certainly was reafonable, that the
lord ihould have the education of the heir, that he
might inftrutft, educate and form him fo, as to be
capable of rendering the due fervices of the feud
to the lord. It was therefore incompatible with
the feudal principle, that any man fhould be em-
powered by will to difinherit the heir, and fo pre-
clude the lord from his beneficial chances o( ward,
marriage and reliefy and deprive him by an impo-
tent fubititute of the civil and military fervices, to
■which by tenure he was entitled. Befides, (fays
Baron Gilbert), (^) '' this vv'ay of conveyance
*^ wanted tha: folemnity, which the feudifts thought
" neceflary to eflabliili in transferring lands 3 and
" if at any time a difpute iliould arife, it might
*^ be the eafier determined by the pares comitatuiy
" who were witneiTes to that notorious and public
" manner of conveying by livery ; and, for that
" reafon, I believe copyhold land was taken to be
" out of the flatute of 3 2d Henry VIII. For their
** furrendtr which is required, as well in devifes as
" in other alienations, anfvvers the notoriety of li-
*' very and feifin, and confequently out of the rea-
" fons of the prohibition of the feudal law. , Thus
" tlie law continued till the invention of ufes,
" which were firit found out by the clergy, to
** evade the ftatutes of mortmain." We have al-
ready faid fo much of the yA of Henry VIII. that
it will be unneceffary to fiy more of it at preknt.
(«) Gilbert's Law of Devifes, p. 9.
0/
[ 123 ]
Of the different Modes cf inrolUng Deeds in the dif-
ferent Courts.
Although I have made cxtcnfive fearches amongfb
the records of the difFcrent courts, yet I do not
claim the pretenfion of having fearched fo minute-
ly, as to give a ftri6l and accurate account of every
deed there recorded ; the refult of my fearches has
however more and more convinced me of the ne-
cefTity of a regular and uniform mode of ilTuing
warrants for inrolling deeds and wills. By confi-
dering minutely the different forts of vvarrants, by
virtue of which, deeds and wills are now ufually
entered upon the rolls, and thereby become record-
ed in court, we fliall be enabled to judge and de-
termine, what fort of warrants ought only to bsif-
fued for that purpofe.
We have before confidered the original intent
and m.eaning of a party acknowledging a deed, and
the effffts produced by that acknowledgment ; and
I appeal to the judgment of thofe, who have really
confidered them, whether any other method be-
Tides that of acknowledgment, can by poiTibility
anfwer the ends, for which deeds are inrolled. The
inrolling a6b of Henry VIII. is compulfive upon
all perfons, who grant land by bargain and fale for
a pecuniary confideration. The inrolling a<5l of
Geo. I. is compulfive upon all Catholics, who af-
fed: their lands by deed or will. The time limited
by both a6ls for inrolling fuch deeds, is fix lunar
months from their date or delivery. Upon their
inrolment or non-inrolment within that fpace of
time, abfolutely depends their validity or nullity.
And according to every idea of common fenfe and
plain reafon, the acl, by v/hich the deed acquires
Its validity, and the omiffion, by which it becomes
a nullity, ought to reft with that party to the deed,
4 whoff
[ 124 1
whofe execution of it gives it effeft; and upon
this principle, it is generally faid, that the grantor
fliould always acknowledge the deed. Nothing
can more plainly fpeak this general prefumption
or opinion, than the provifions in the aforefaid re-
giftering atfts, for the inrolment of bargains and
fales in the regiftry of the refpedlive riding of the
county of York, where the lands connprifed in the
deed lie. Thefe a6ls require, as a previous requi-
fite to the inrolment of any fuch deed, that the
grantor fhall acknowledge it before two iuftices of
the peace of that riding; prefuming, that if the
deed had been inroUed in a court of record, it
would have been acknowledged before one of the
judges of the court by the grantor, as, in my
humble opinion, it ought to be. For I again re-
peat my opinion, that no deed whatfoever ought
to be inrolledj till it has been acknowledged by
the party, whofe execution of it gives its effeft,
before fuch authority, as can thereupon ilTue a war-
rant to the offiters of the court to inrol it.
I have before faid much of the nature o^ fiats y
under which many of the Roman catholic deeds
are inroUed. But then this fort of warrant feems
to have been generally confined to fuch deeds,
unlefs in fome few inftances they have been iffued
for inrolling deeds pro Jalvd cufiodid. It Ihould
appear ex vi terminty that deeds fo inrolled were
kept or depofited in fome cuftody, which is not
the cafe. And yet it is faid in Salkeld, (^) that
** at common law,'' there was " an inrolment pro
" Jalva cujiodid" and it appears from what I have
faid before, viz. that, as the court would not ad-
mit of a voluntary inrolment, without the acknow-
ledgment of the party, much Icfs would they inrol
a deed under a coercive llatute without its and
{a) Salk. 348.
therefore
t '^5 3
therefore, when fiich voluntary inrohiients v/ere
made, the deeds were uiually acknowledged pre-
vioiiHy by the party. It often happens, that
perlbns wifhing to feciire and perpetuate the me-
mory of deeds, after the parties to them are dead,
have applied to the judges of the court for a war-
rant to the officer to inrol them ; and after the
deaths of the parties, (as in wills) what other war-
rant can be ifTued than z.fiat ? And it may be fairly
prefumed, that wherever a fiat has been iffued for
inrolling fuch a deed, when the granting or operat-
ing party to it was living, it has been the prefump-
tion and fuppofition of the judge, who figned the
fiat, that the party was dead, or otherwife, that he
would have come to acknov/ledge his own a6l and
deed, if he wifhed it to be inrolled and recorded.
From the eftedbs produced by the inrolment of
a At^^i, it muft be allowed, that there is a very
material difference between a deed inrolled, and a
deed not inrolled; and it would be highly unrea-
fonable, that this difference fhould be made to de-
pend upon the acft of an utter ftrangr'r to the deed :
for either the fiat is figned by the judge, without
any queftion or examination into the reafon, mo-
tive or pretenfions of the perfon, who prefents the
warrant for figning ; or it is figned upon the affi-
davit of an attefting vvitncfs to the fealing and de-
livery of the deed, by one of the parties to it. In
both thefe cafes, the deed may come to be recorded
in court, without the intention, and even againft
the wifli of the grantor j and if we refledb, that the
inrolment is but the completion of the a(5t of tranf-
fer, as was before obferved, the abfurdity of its
being completed without the privity or againft the
wifh of the grantor, will appear in its true colours.
The court of Chancery very frequently, and the
court of King's Bench in lome inftances, has adopted
gnother method of inrolling bargains and fales, viz,
by
[ 126 ]
hy the affidavit of an attefting witnefs to the exe-
cution of the deed ; and although I cannot even
invent a folid and fubftantial reafon for their fo
doing, yet muft it be allowed, that they have the
fandlion of authority for it ; and fo much cannot
be faid in favour o^ fiats. It is faid («) '■'■ that a
*' deed may be inroUed ^without the examination of the
" -party -t upon proof by witnejfes, that the party de-
" liveredit." And {b) "party died before acknow-
" ledgment^yet the deed was inr oiled''
To reduce this fubjeLt to fome confiftent degree
of reafon and regularity, we muft allow, that no
deed whatfoever fhould be inrolled, v/ithout the
acknowledgment of the granting or efficient party
to the deed, if he be living ,• and as it may often
happen, that not only by death, but even by fick-
nefs, bufinefs and inconveniency, a perfon may be
prevented or hindred from appearing perfonally
before a judge or magiflrates, to acknowledge a
deed j yet may he always at the fame time execute
a fpecial warrant of attorney, Vv^hich fliould be an-
nexed unto or indorfed upon, or even included in
the deed, tp empower fome proper perfon to ac-
knowledge the execution of it on -his or her be-
half, before a judge or magiflrates, and to defire
that it may be inrolled in a proper court. Such a
pradlice is not only warrantable upon the general
principle of all powers of attorney, qui facit per
aliuMy facit per Je -y but alfo more efpecially upon
another axiom, that qui potefl majusypotefl & minus.
For if a perfon can legally depute another to feal
and deliver a deed for him, he certainly may em*
power him to acknowledge his own execution.
But this is a matter fo plain and fimple, that I
fhall neither quote authorities, nor fay any thing
more upon the fubjedb.
(«) Codb. 270. (/') 3 Leon 84.
Points
t 127 ]
Points of pra6lice are often the ftrongeft evi-
dence of points of law ; and nothing more forcibly
proves, that the law intended, and in fa6t prefumes,
th:.t all deeds inrolled are or ought to be acknow-
ledged, than the titles, which are prefixed to the
inrolments of each term, in every one of the four
different courts of record ; which invariably run,
£Ognita et irrotulata-^ that is acknowledged and in-
rolled, &c. whence it is a juft inference, that none,
but fuch as are acknowledged, are fuppofed to be
inrolled.
^he Ohj colons againjl the Notoriety of Deeds and
IV ills affecting Lands.
The grand, and indeed the only objection,
which ever hath been raifed againft the notoriety
of deeds and wills affcfting lands is, that thereby
family lecrets and tranfli6lions may be laid open
and divulged ; but this will foon vanifh, when we
refle6t, that every will of pcrfonal property mufh
be proved in the fpiritual court i under the feal of
which, letters teftamentary are granted, by which
the executor is enabled to maintain an action j and
that a will oiice proved, is depoficed as a public
and notorious a6t of the party, to which all per-
fons, but more efpecially the next of kin (who in
cale of an inteftacy would have been intitled to
the perfonal eftate of the deceafed) may have re-
courfe, and know without being driven to the ex-
pence and trouble of a fuit or aftion, upon what
ground, and in what manner they are deprived of
thofe rights, v.'hich the law would have cafl upon
them, if the deceafed had not counterafted its
effedts by a will. I have never known any incon-
veniency arife from fuch publication and notoriety
pf wills: on the contrary, I believe there are few
perfons, who have ever been concerned in the wills
of
[ 128 ]
of their relations or friends, who have not reafon
to rejoice and approve of their being thus regularly
depofited, and open to public infpeflion.
If then in the bequeft of perfonal goods and
chattels, the title to which is ever more fimple and
obvious than to land, this notoriety is required by
law, how much more requifite is it, when an heir
at law is either wJiolly or partially difinherited,
or made liable and fubjecled to a temporary or
permanent incumbrance, or is crampt and limited
in his inheritance, that the inftrument fhouid be
publiflied and recorded, fo as to be open to public
infpedion and confideration, without aftion at law
or fuit in equity! For it is undeniable, that all
muniments and titles to land, and emphatically
fuch as go to interrupt the legal courfe of inheri-
tance, fhouid be matters of publicity, notoriety and
perpetuity.
As the power of dcvifing lands, guard ianfhips,
&c. was either given or received by ftatute, the
wills, by which they are devifed, are not fubje6ted
to the Ipiritual court, in which alone a public en-
try of wills is made, {a) Where "a guardianfhip
*• of a child is devifed by will, it fliall not be
*' proved in the fpiritual court, becaufe it being
•* a power given by the ftatute, it properly belongs
" to the courts at Weftminfter to determine, whe-
" ther the devife was made purfuant to the ftatute,
*' and therefore like wills, by which lands are de-
" vifed, it is ufually proved by witnefles in Chan-
" eery." But fuch probate in Chancery is not
compulfory ; it is no copy, and therefore no record
of the will J nor does it operate any other efFeft,
than the perpetuation of the teftimony of the wit-
nefles to the execution of the will by the devifor.
It rarely happens, that devifcs of land are made by
(«) 1 Vent. 207.
wills.
[ 1^9 ]
wills, which do not difpofe of fome perfonal eftate :
the quere then arifes, when the land devifed is the
principal obje6t of the tefbament, fhall it, or fhall
it not be adjudged by the fpiritual court ? Now
what can be more abfurd and inconfiftent, than,
that an inftrunnent, by which property is difpofed
of in this country, (hall be liable to a decifion by
two feparate, diftinft and contrary laws ? For fuch
in fa6t are the Roman law, by which the eccle-
fiaftical courts judge ; and the Knglifli law, which
determines the decifions of our courts of law and
equity, {a) Libel in the fpiritual court, " to prove
" a will, the defendant fuggefted for a prohibi-
" tion, that in the will there were lands and lega-
" cies devifed, and that the teftator was non com-
** pos mentis ; but the prohibition was denied, be-
*' caufe the ftatute of Hen. VIII. never intended
" to diminiih the jurifdi6tion of the fpiritual court,
'^ as to probates ; and it might be very inconve-
" nient to flay the probate in this cafe, becaufe
" whilfb it is flayed, the executor cannot fue for
*^ debts j and by that means they may be lofl, and
** the will not performed ; and it would be to no
*' purpofe to grant a prohibition as to the lands,
*^ becaufe as to them the probate is coram non ju-
" dice^ and cannot be given in evidence in any
" court of law."
Who does not fee the extremity of folly, in
obliging devifees in general to enter and prove
wills pafling lands in a court, which hath not, nor
x:an have any cognizance or jurifdidlion over them.
Independant of the ufelefs expcnce, it is highly
derogatory from the dignity and refpeft due to
our national jurifprudence. (^) " Where a will
*' is made of lands and goods, the temporal courts
{a) Partridge V. Cave, 2 Salk. 553.
{b) Netter v. Brett, W. Jones 355. Cr. Car. 391. 395.
K ^ wiU
[ ^3^ ]
" will PxOt prohibit it to be proved in the fpiritual
" court. 'Tis true, this was againli the opinion of
" Juftice Croke, becaufe the land being the prin-
" cipal, the fpiritual court had no authority in fuch
" cafe. And that it would be inconvenient if they
" fhould; for the fentence given in that court
" might have fome influence upon any fuit, which
" might happen in the temporal courts concerning
" the land, (a) And it is faid elfewhere, that a
" will of lands ought not to be pioved in the fpi-
" ritual court." From thence and the like cafes,
we fee the inconveniency and incongruity of the
prefent law of devifes of lands, and the urgent nc-
ceffity of publifhing and perpetuating all wills and
codicils in any manner affefting them; for by
■ them, titles are weakened or confirmed, heirs at law
difmherited, purchafers and mortgagees flrength-
ened or Ihaken in their purchafes or fecurities, and
all perfons claiming right under the devifor, moft
materially affefted. Every end of notoriety and
perpetuity will be anfv/ered by inroUing wills affeft-
jng lands, in the like manner, as wills of perfonalty
are now entered for weaker reafons, in the fpiritual
court. As the law ever favours the heir, it will
prefume him to have the right, until it be proved
that he is difmherited : he ought not therefore upon
any principle of law or equity to be driven to
expence and litigation, in order to prove his own
dilherifon ; efpecially as fuch diflierifon is effefted
by a legal ad or inftrument, which is warranted by
an exprefs ftatute. But yet the title, which is ac-
quired under fuch will, is in its nature inferior to
the title acquired by the dcfccnt, which is caft at
law. (^) "So ifadevife be m.ade to John Stiles
" and his heirs, who is heir at law to the devifor.
{a) Hill V. Thornton ii3.
{6) 3 Co. 31. a. Plowdcn's Com. 344. p.
]
office : And every fiich entry (hall fct forth
the date of the deed, will or codicil, or ab-
ftraftj and the name and names of the grant-
ing or covenanting party or parties to the
deed, or of the teliator or tellatrix, and the
time, at which the iame was inrolled or en-
tered.
And be it further declared and enacted by The fees, how
the authority aforc!:iid, That all fuch payments ^°''''' api'ii'-^J*
hereby dire<5ted to be made into the faid courts
or offices, ffiall be paid unto and received by
the commiffioners, officers or clerks for the
time being, for their care, management and
cuftody of fuch inrolments and entries, and
for attending by themfelves or deputies, at
fuch hours during which the faid courts or of-
fires are hereby direded to be kept open as
aforefaid, and for computing and examining
all fuch deeds, wills, codicils and abftra6ls,
and for making extrafts and copies thereof^
and alfo for making and keeping fuch books
of entries and references, and alfo for colleft-
ing and making out fuch entries of all deeds,
■wills, codicils and abftrads, and tranfmitting
the fame every half-year to the clerk, officer
or commiffioner of the reference office in
London, as is hereinafter mentioned, and alfo
for paying and di ("charging all the cofts,
charges and expences of all the parchment and
paper ufed in their refpeflive courts or offices,
and alfo for paying and difcharging whatever
yearly or other payments, rents, taxes, impo-
fitions or afreifments ffiall from time to time
become due and payable, for and in refpedt
of the houfesj buildings and premises, in which
fuch courts or offices, and repofitories ffiall
be, and alfo whatever monies ffiall from time
to time be required to keep the fam.e in con-
M ftant.
[ i62 ]
flant, good and fubftantial repairs, and alfo
for defraying all the expences, cofts and
charges, which fhall be incurred by the poft-
age and carriage of letters, packets and par-
cels, and generally by all other matters rela-
tive to the bufinefs of the faid courts or of-
fices.
A reference And In Order, that perfons having occafion
bShed?'''''^"'t:o fearch the different courts or offices for the
inrolment of fuch deeds, wills and codicils,
may do the fame with the greater eafe, cer-
tainty and fatisfaction ; be it further declared
and ena6led by the authority aforefaid, That
from and after the day of in the year
1789, there fhall be erefted or purchafed and
eftabliflied a reference office in or near
in the faid county of Middlefex, at the joint
expences and ' by equal contribution of each
county, riding and divifion throughout Eng-
land and Wales, in which any fuch court or
office is or fhall be efi:ablifhed as aforefaid.
xin^to appoint And it is further declared and enafted by
clerks of the the authority aforefaid. That it fhall and may
«ffice. be lawful to and for the King's Majefly, his
heirs and fucceflbrs to nominate and appoint
by commilTion, to be iflued under the great
feal of Great Britain, fuch two perfons, as his
Majefty fhall think fit to be the officers, clerks
or commiffioners, for managing, conducing
and executino; the bufinefs of fuch reference
office by themfclves, or their fufficient deputy
or deputies, and who fliall continue in fuch
office, charge or commiffion fo long, as they
fhall well and faithfully demean themfelves
The clerks to therein; and they fliall before their admiffion
ties 'to^enter' ^^ f^^ch office, charge or com.miflion, find two
iatorecogni- fufficient furctics, who fliall enter into feparate
each."" ^°'' recognizances, before the lord high Chan-
cellor
[ i63 ]
cellor of England, or the lord chief Juftice
of his Majefty's court of King's Bench, or of
the Common Pleas at Weitminfter, or the
lord chief Baron of his Majefty's court of
Exchequer, wherein they fhall become refpec-
tively bounden to his Majefty, his heirs and
fuccefTors, in the fum of ^. 3000 each, for
the punctual and faithful execution of the
faid office, charge or commiffion, by the per-
fons fo to be nominated, appointed and com-
miflioned as aforefaid : And fuch officers, And take the
cleik or commiffioners, ffiall alfo before their °''^°^"^"'
admiffion to the faid office, charge or com-
miffion, before the lord high Chancellor of
England, or the chief Juftice of his Majefty's
court of King's Bench, or of the Common
Pleas, at Weftminfter, or of the chief Baron
of his Mnjefty's court of Exchequer, take and
fubfcribe an oath in the form following; that
is to fay —
" I A. B. having been appointed by his Ma-
" jefty's commiffion, under the great feal
" of Great Britain, an officer, clerk or com-
" miffioner of the reference office, do
*^ hereby folemnly fwear, that 1 will duly,
" juftly and faithfully execute the faid of-
" fice, charge or commiffiion, according
" to the tenor, condition, andrequifitions
" of the aft of the 29th year of the reign
" of his Majefty King George III. inti-
" tuled, " An a6i for requiring the inrolment
" of all deeds y wills and codicils ^ relating to,,
*' touching or affe^ing any freehold or leafe-
" hold landsy tenements or hereditaments
" within the kingdom of England and do-
*' minion of Wales ^ and for other purpofes
" therein mentioned." So help me God."
And it is further declared and enaded by The books,
the authority aforefaid. That feparate and °''^" '^ ^^'
M 2 ' diftind
[ 164 ]
di{l:in6l books for each county, riding or di-
vifion, in which a court or office is or fhall
be erefted or efbablifhed, fhall be kept and
preferved in the rtference office, in which
entries fhall be made of all deeds, wills and
codicils, and of all abftrads, that have been
inroUed or entered in any of the courts of re-
cord, or county courts or offices refpcftively as
aforefiid ; and every fuch entry fhall fet forth
the date of the deed, will or codicil or abftraft,
and the name or names of the grantor or
grantors, grantee or grantees, or of the tefta-
tor or teftatrix, and the county or counties,
in which the lands, tenements or heredita-
ments afFefted by fuch deed, will or codicil
lie, and the court in which, and the time, at
which the fame was inrolled or entered.
One (hiiiins to And it is further declared and enafted, by
Iiec'"tov-nr J'*'^ ^'^^ authority aforefaid. That every perfon in-
the reference rolling or caufiug to bc inroiled or entered
°*"* any deed, will or codicil or abftradl as afore-
faid, in any of the faid courts of record, or
in any of the faid county courts or offices, is
hereby required to pay one ffiilling over and
above all other payments hereby direfted and
required to be m.ade as aforefaid, for every
fuch dt'td, will or codicil or abftraft, fo in-
rolled or entered as aforefaid, unto the clerk,
officer or commiffioncr of the court, in which
fuch deed, will or codicil or abftraft, is re-
fpeftively ini'olled or entered.
Knt.ic. toiic And it is furdier enaifted and declared by
trnnimtu donee tl^e authority aforcfiid, I'hat the officers, com-
K.ihc refer- miilioners or ckrks or the dim-rent county
entcoiiice. courts, are hereby directed and required, in
confideration of the aforefaid emoluments and
perquifites hereby allowed unto them, to
tranfmit once in every month, fuch entries of
the diflercnt deeds, wills, codicils and ab-
ilrads,
[ i65 ]
Hrafts, as have been inrolled and entered in
their refpeftivc court or office, to the officers
clerks or commiffioners ot the faid reference
office, who are alio hereby required to enter
thii fame forrhwith in the levcral and refpec-
tive books, in the manner and form aforefaid ;
and to pay or tranfmit, or caufe to be paid or
tranfmitted, at the fame time, the fum of one
fniliing unto the clerks, commiffioners or
officers of the faid reference office, which
they ffiall have received in manner aforefaici :
And the faid officers, clerks or commiffioners The clerks of
of the faid reference office, fhall once in '']^ leference
, -" orhce to extract
every month, make or cauie to be made, an monthly all
extradl or entry of every deed, will or codicil, InroiieTfnThe^
inrolled in any of the faid courts of record courts of re-
at Weftminfter ; and they fhall receive from '^"'
the clerks, officers or commiffioners of the
refpeftive courts, in which fuch deed, will or
codicil fhall be inrolled, the fum of one ffiil-
ling for each deed, will, codicil or abftrad:,
which ffiall have been received by them, at
the time of their original inrolment or en-
try refpectivelv ; all which extra6ls or entries The entries to
ntiir-i'* J 11 J be made in the
Ihall be fairly written and regularly entered books of ihc
in the books for the different counties for 'eference
that purpofe kept in the faid reference
office.
And it is further declared and enabled by Notice to be
the authority aforefaid. That from and after s'^'^"''"y'"'''"s
the laid day or in the year 1789, ence office of
whenever a iudgment, ilatute or recognizance, i^^'s"'^"/^' ft^-
J CD ' _ n II tutes and recog-
(other than and except iuch, as mail be en- nizances.
tered in the name and upon the proper ac-
count of his Majefty, his heirs or fucceflbrs)
fhall be obtained or entered into, of or con-
cerning, or whereby any freehold or leafehold
lands, tenements or hereditaments, within the
M 3 kingdom
[ '66 ]
kingdom of England, or dominion of Wales,
can, (hall or may be in any manner affedled,
in law or equity, the plaintiff or plaintiffs,
conufee or conufees, Ihall within the fpace
of three days after the entering up of any fuch
judgment or acknowledgment of any fwch
ftatute or recognizance, is and are hereby
required to give notice thereof in writing to
the clerks, officers or commiffioners of the
faid reference office ; and every fuch no-
tice, which Ihall be figned by the clerk or
clerks of the court, in which fuch judgment,
ftatute or recoo-nizance fhall be recorded re-
fpeftivelvj (hall contain the name or names of
the plaintiff or plaintiffs, and defendant or de-
fendants, conufor or conufors, and conufee
or conufees, in fuch judgment, ftatute or re-
cognizance refpecflively ; the day, on which
fuch judgment ffiall have been entered up, or
fuch ftatute or recognizance fhall have been
acknowledged, and the amount of the fum or
fums of money, for which fuch judgment fliall
have been obtained, or fuch ftatute or recog-
nizance ffiall have been acknowledged re-
fpedlively ; and the county, riding or divifion,
in which any lands, tenements or heredita-
ments are fituate, lying and being, which are
Entries thereof affedled thereby in law or equity: And the
tobenade. clerks, officers or comm.iffioners of the faid
office, ffiall and are hereby required to make
entries thereof, in the refpedlive books of the
faid reference office ; and ffiall and are alfo
hereby required within the fpace of three days,
to be computed from the time of their receiv-
ing fuch notice or notices, to tranfmit a copy
f^x copies of the entry of every fuch judgment,
ftatute or recognizance, to the clerk, officer
or commiffioner of the court or office, v/ithin
the
[ i67 ]
the diftri6l of which, any of the lands, tene-
ments or hereditaments, Jb affefted by the
judgment, ftatute or recognizance as aforefaid,
are fituate, lying and being, in order that a
proper entry may be made of fuch judgment,
ftatute or recognizance, in the books of each
court or office, by the refpeftive clerk, officer
or commiffioner thereof, who in confideration
of the allowances hereby made to him and
them, is and are hereby required to enter fuch
copies fo tranfmittcd to them in their refpeftive
books.
Provided always, and it is further declared No land to bs
and enafted by the authority aforefaid, That?'^f'^^'^ ''y/
. . . , ^ - J '. judgment, &c.
no luch judgment, itatute nor recognizance, unieis notice
ffiall in any manner affeft any lands, tene- [-^reace'office'.
ments or hereditaments, of or concerning
which, fuch notice fhall not have been given
to or left with the clerks, officers or com-
miffioners of the faid reference office as
aforefaid.
And it is further declared and enaded by Fee of one
the authority aforefaid, That the clerks, offi- 'V'",'"^ ^"'' r'*''
cers or commiffioners of the faid reference mitting the no-
office, are hereby authorized and empowered '"■"'^ '° ^'^^^^
1 ^ r 1 r r \ • • rr^ ^ ■ county court.
to demand or and from fuch plaintiff or plain-
tiffs, conufee or conufees, the fum of one
fhilling for each county, riding or divifion, to
the court or office of which, they are hereby
required to fend or tranfmit fuch notice of
any judgment, ftatute or recognizance as
aforefaid.
And it is further declared and enacfted by satisfnaions
the authority aforefaid. That from and after ''""'.'" ^.'^ ^"■
, . ■' - . , _ tcred and cer-
the day ot in the year of our tified.
Lord 1789, in cafe the whole or any part of
the money fecured under or by virtue of any
deed, will, codicil, judgment, ftatute or recog-
M 4 nizance,
[ i68 ]
nizance, which Ihall have been fo inrolled or
entered as aforefaid, fhall be paid off, fatis-
fied or difcharged, if at any time or times af-
terwards a certificate fhall be brought to the
clerk, officer or commifTioner of the court or
office, in which fuch inrolment or entry fliall
have been made, figncd by the perfon or per-
fons entitled to receive fuch monies, and at-
tefted by two credible witnefTes fpecifying the
amount of the monies paid off, fatisfied and
difcharged, (which witneffes fhall upon their
oath before any one of the Judges of his Ma^
jelly's court of King's B'.^nch or Common
pleas, or any one of the Barons of the court of
Exchequer, or before any one of the mafters
of the court of Chancery, or before any two
or more juftices of the peace, or before the
clerk, officer or commjffioner of the court or
office, in which fuch deed, will, codicil, judg-
ment, ftatute or recognizance fhall have been
inrolled or entered refpeftively, who are hereby
refpe6tively impowered to adminifler fuch
oath, prove fuch monies to have been paid
off, fatisfied or difcharged accordingly, and
that they faw fuch certificate figned by the
perfon or perfons intitlcd to receive the fame)
and then in every fuch cafe, the clerk, officer
or commiffioncr, or his or their deputy or de-
puties, fhall make an entry in the margin, or
at the foot of every fuch roll of a deed, will or
codicil, and in the margin of every book op-
pofite to the entry of every judgment, ftatute
or recognizance, under or by virtue of which,
the monies fo paid off, fatisfied or difcharged,
fliall have been fecured or made payable, that
the fame have been paid off, fatisfied and
difcharged according to fuch certificate, to
which the faijie roll or entry fhall refer j and
fhall
[ -69 ]
fhall after file fuch certificate to remain upon
record in the faid court or office : and all
fuch clerks, officers or commilTioners are
hereby authorized and impowered to demand
the fum of one fiiilling from every perfon or
perfons bringing fuch certificate, to be entered
and filed as aforefaid.
And it is further declared and enacted by Theiv.okstobe
the authority aforefaid, That the faid feveral "J^^'^
books of entries or extracts lliall be kept in
the faid reference office open for the in-
fpeftion of all perfons, upon all days (ex-
cept Sundays and holydays) throughout the
year, from tlie hour of ten of the clock in
the forenoon, 'till three of the clock in the
afternoon of the fame day: And the officers, Fees for fearch-
clerks or commiffioners for the time being, " ^'^"^ '■"P"'^"
of the faid reference office, and their depu-
ties, are hereby authorized and impowered to
demand the fum of one fhilling from every
perfon, for each fearch, which he or they
Ihall make ; and alio to demand the like fum
of one fhilling, for every entry or extra6l,
which they fiiall be required to make a copy of.
And it is further declared and enabled, by Application of
the authority aforelaid. That as well the mo- ^^''^'
nies paid or remitted to the clerks, officers
or commiffioners of the faid reference office,
at the time of their taking or receiving fuch
entries or extrafts as aforefaid, as the monies
received for all fearches and copies as afore-
faid, fiiall be allowed unto the faid clerks,
officers or commiffioners, for attending and
collefting fuch entries or extrafts from the
faid courts of record in manner aforefaid ; and
for purchafing, digefting and keeping the
aforefaid books, and m.aking fuch entries and
cxtrafts therein, and for attending the faid
office
[ lyo ]
ojSice at the hours before mentioned, and
for defraying the expences and charges of
keeping; one or more deputy or deputies,
and alio for paying and difcharging what-
ever yearly or other payments, rents, taxes
or afiefTments, fhall from time to time be-
come due and payable, for and in refpeft of
the houfe, buildings, and premifTes, in which
the faid reference office fhall be, and alfo
whatever monies fhall from time to time be
required to keep the fame in conftant, good
and fubflantial repair, and alfo for defraying
all the expences, cofls and charges, which
fhall be incurred by the poftage or carriage
of letters, packets and parcels, and generally
by all other matters neceffarily relating to,
touching or concerning the faid reference
olEce.
Membersofpar- And bc it further declared and enabled by
liameni not eii- ^\^q authority afotcfaid. That no member of
parliament for the time being, of any county,
city or borough, fliall be capable of being
chofen clerk, ofHcer or commifTioner of any
fuch court or office of a county, riding or
divifion, or of the reference ofEce, or of exe-
cuting by him.felf or any other perfon, fuch
office, or have, take or receive any fee. or
other profit whatever, for or in refpeft there-
of; nor fhall any fuch clerk, officer or com-
miffioner, or his 'or their deputy or deputies
for the time being, be capable of being chofen
to ferve in parliament.
Recital. And whereas it fometlmes happeneth, that
wills and codicils are deftroyed, miflaid, loll
or fupprefTed, by accident, negleft or defign,
whereby the rights of your Majefty's liege
fubjefts, who might have claimed under
fuch wills and codicils, are defeated j and
whereas
[ 171 ]
whereas it may be fatisfaclory for many
perfons having made wills or codicils to
wills, or other teflamentary difpofitions or
inftru6lions, that the fame may be depofitcd
during their lives, in fome fecure repofitory,
and that no perfon, but the teftator or tefla-
trix can have accefs during his or her life
to fuch wills or codicils, and no other but the
proper perfon or perfons can have accefs to or
acquire the poffeflion thereof after their deaths ;
be it therefore declared and enafted, by the ^[^^ ^^^^^^ ^^
authority aforcfaid, That from and after the provide an s-
j r • . 1 partmei'it in the
day of in theyear|:ef,,,„eeoffice,
of our Lord 1789, the faid clerks, officers for Jepofitin^
or commiflioners of the faid reference office ^^'
fliall prepare and diftribute into alphabetical
and chronological order, an apartment in the
faid reference office, in which all wills or
codicils, or teftamentary difpofitions or inftruc-
tions which fhall be brought to the faid office,
ffiall be depofited, and fafely and orderly kept,
until the fame fhall be required to be delivered
out in manner hereinafter mentioned.
And be it further declared and ena6led, by Themnnncrof
the authority aforcfaid. That if any perfon tiepofitingwiUs,
I r 1 J r 1- L -11 fct. feestobe
chuiing to leave or depoiit his or her will or paid.
codicil, or teitamentary difpofition or inftruc-
tions in the faid office, ffiall bring the fame
to the faid clerks, officers or commiffioners,
and pay the furn of 2s. 6d. to fuch clerks,
officers or commiffioners, then fuch clerks,
officers or commiffioners ffiall annex or affix
unto fuch will or codicil, or teftamentary dif-
pofition or inftruftions, or unto the cover,
packet or parcel, which ffiall contain the fair.e,
a label or flip of parchment, upon which ffiall
be written the name and defcription of the
teftator
[ 172 ]
teftator or tcflatrix, with foaie numerical figure
or figures, and the name of the clerks, of-
ficers or commifTioners, and the fame fhall be
ftampt with the ftamp of the office, and that
part of the label or flip of parchment, which
fhall contain the name of the clerks, officers
or commiffioners, and the numerical figure or
figures, fhall be cut off by an indented fec-
tion, and delivered to the teftator or teftatrix,
which being produced to the clerks, officers
or commiffioners of the faid reference office,
or to their deputy or deputies, ffiall be to him
or her a certificactd authority to demand the
delivery of the will, codicil, teftamentary dif-
pofition or inftrutlions, or the packet or par-
cel, to which the fame ffiall belong j and an
entry ffiall be immediately forthwith made in
the liooks, which the clerks, officers or com-
miffioners for the time being, are hereby re-
quired to keep for that purpofe in alphabetical
and chronological order, of the day, on which
the fame was left or depofited, and of the name
and defcription of the teftator or teftatrix, and
of the numerical figure or figures exprefled
upon the label or flip of parchment as afore-
faid ; and every fuch entry fVall be figned by
the teftator or teftatrix, or his or her attorney
or attornies for that particular purpofe efpe-
cially authorized and deputed.
Manner of drii- And it is further declared and enacted by
^♦^'y'''*'^;;'''^'' the authority atorefaid, That whenever any
ict. to teftator •' ^ n n i i r -j
or teftatrix. perfon or perlons inali produce to the laid
clerks, officers or commiffioners, or their de-
puty or deputies, any fuch label or flip of
parchment fo indented, ftamped and figned as
aforefaid, every fuch will, codicil, teftament-
ary difpofitioEi or inftrudions, or the packet
or parcel, to which tlie fame ffiall have been
annexed
[ 173 J
annexed cr afFixed, or il'iall belong, fhall be
dtlivcrcd to the perfon or perfons protlucing
fuch label or flip of parclmient as aforelaid ;
and the entry thereof made in fuch book or
books as aforefaid, fliall be croffed or marked,
and the teflator or tcflatrix fo receiving back
his or her will or codicil, teftamenrary difpo-
fition or inftrudlions, fhall fign in the margin
of fuch book or books oppofue to the entry
thereof, his or her name by w.iv of acknow-
ledging the receipt thereof;- and every per- "»e ihiiiing to
Ion to whom fuch delivery fliall be made, ij^^.^i-y oTeactr
fliall pay unto the laid clerks, officers ^'■■'^^•
or commifTioners, the fum of one fhil-
ling.
Provided always, and it is further declared Manner of de-
and enafted by the authority aforefaid, That no teJ^.^|"r'rattQr-
■will, codicil, teftamentary difpofition, nor in- "')'•
ftrudlions fo depofited as aforefaid, fhall be
delivered to any other perfon or perfons, than
the teflator or teflatrix, unlefs a power of at-,
torney from the teflator or tcflatrix fliall be
produced, together wiih fuch certificated au-
thority as aforefaid properly executed, and au-
thorizing the perfon or perfons producing fuch
certificated authority, label, or flip of parch-
ment fo indented, ftampt, and figned as afore-
faid, to demand the delivirry of the will or
codicil, or packet cr parcel, to which the
fame had b':en annexed or aflixed, or did
belong.
Provided always, and it is further declared The powers of
and enafted by the aurliority aforefaid, Thatf"7f>V"V
^ J J . ' ilcpofued and
cverv fuch power of attorney, by virtue of delivered out
which, any will, codicil, tL-fl:amentary difpo- '"'^^ '^" ''■''•••
fltion or inftruftions fhall have been left or
depofincd in luch ofFice as aforefaid, fliall be
depoflted, kept and delivered our, together
with
[ '74 ]
I
with the will or codicil, packet or parcel, to'
which the fame fhall refer or belong.
Provifo for de- And it is further declared and enacfled by
iii'SL"hriabei ^^^ authority aforefaid, That in cafe any fuch
or nip of parch- label or flip of parchment fo indented, ftampt,
^ent be loft, ^^j ^^^^^^ ^^ aforcfaid, lliall be loft, miflaid,
deftroyed, or fraudulently obtained or fup-
prefTed from the teftator or teftatrix, or from
his or her lawful attorney or attornies, then
upon an affidavit having been made before a
proper magiftrate or magiftrates of all the cir-
cumftances of the cafe, as it fhall have hap-
pened, and fuch affidavit being produced to
the faid clerks, officers or commiffioners, or
their deputy or deputies, they ffiall, and are
hereby required to deliver out the will, codicil,
teftamentary difpofition or inftruilions, and
the cover, packet or parcel, to which fuch
label or flip of parchment fo indented, ftampt
and figned as aforefaid ffiall have belonged, in
the fame manner, as if it had been aftually
produced, and the perfon or perfons receiving
the fame, by virtue of and under fuch af-
fidavit, ffiall fign his, her or their name or
■ names in the margin of the faid book or books
as aforefaid, oppofite to the refpe6live entry fo
to be crofled or marked as aforefaid, and add
thereto the words, ly affidavit; and the pro-
dudion of fuch affidavit properly fvvorn to
anil figned, fliall be, and is hereby declared
to be a full and fufficient authority, warrant
and indemnity to the clerks, officers or com-
miffioners for delivering in confequence there-
of, fuch will, codicil, packet or parcel as afore-
faid, againft all perfons vvhomfoever.
Manner of lie- Provided always, and it is further declared
iivcnnKout ^^■^^\ cnadcd by the authority aforefaid, That
dVaihutuftaior. aftcr thc death of any j^erfon, who ffiall liave
io
[ '75 ]
lb depofited his or her will, codicil, teftament-
ary difpofition or inftru6lions as aforcfaid, no
luch will, codicil, teftamentary difpofition nor
inftru6lions fliali be delivered unto any perfon or
perfons bringing fiich label or flip of parchment
fo indented, ftamped, and figned as aforefaid,
until a certificate of the burial of fuch perfon fo
having died, fliall have been produced, figned
by the minifter or pried of the parifh or place
where he fhall have been buried; or in cafe
of accidental death or no burial, until an af-
fidavit of the death fworn before a proper ma-
giftrate or magiftrates of the place or country,
where fuch perfon fhall have fo died without
having been buried, fhall have been produced s
and upon the produ6lion of any fuch certifi-
cate or affidavit, the clerks, officers or conn-
milTioners, and their deputy or deputies, are
hereby i^equired to open fuch will, codicil,
teftamentary difpofition or inftru6tions as afore-
faid, in the prefence of the perfon or perfons
producing fuch label or flip of parchm.ent fo
indented, ftamped, and figned as aforefaid,
together with fuch certificate or affidavit -,
and in cafe it fhall appear, that fuch perlbnFeeofas. 6d.t«
or perfons is or are intitled under fjch will p^.^-J^jf ^^/^J^*__
or codicil, either as executor or executrix, or i"s the wui.
• executors or otherwife, to the pofTefTion of
fuch will, codicil, teftamentary difpofition or
inftruftions, in order to prove or inrol the
fame, then the fame ftiall be delivered to
fuch perfon or perfons accordingly, upon pay-
ment of the fum of is. 6d. unto the faid
officers, clerks or commiflloners.
Provided neverthelefs, and it is further de- to whom wiiis
Glared and enafted by the authority aforefaid, ["J.'^f^^of'no^'''
That any perfon or perfons producing fuch certificated au-
certificace or affidavit of the burial or death of ''''^'"''y ^°^"'^-
any
t >76 ]
any perfon to the faid clerks, officers or com-
miflioners, although no fiich label or flip of
parchment, indented, ftampt and figned as
aforelaid fhall have been found in the pofTef-*,
fion of the perfon fo deceafed, fhall be intitled.
Ami for what ipon paying the fum of one fhilling to the
faid clerks, officers or commifljoners, to fearch
all the books, in which any fuch entries have
been made as aforelaid ; and in cafe any fuch
will, codicil, teftamentary difpofition or in-
llruftions fhall be found to have been there
left and depofited by the perfon lb deceafed,
the fame fhall immediately be opened and de-
livered upon payment of the additional funi
of IS. 6d. to the faid clerks, officers or com-
miffioners in manner aforefaid.
To whom wills Provided neverthelefs, and it is further de-
ivbeV'nreS clared and enafted by the authority aforelaid,
^utor. That in cafe the perfon or perfons fo producing
fuch label or flip of parchment, and fuch cer-
tificate or affidavit as aforefaid, fhall not ap-
pear to be intitled to the pofTelfion of fuch will,
codicil, teftamentary difpofuion or inftruftions,
then the clerks, officers or commiffioners, fhall
immediately give notice in writing to the exe-
cutor or executrix, or executors in fuch will
or codicil named ; or in cafe of none fuch, to
the perfon or perfons who fhall appear to be
intitled to the greateft beneficial interefl under
the fame, and fliall deliver the fime to fuch
perfon or perfons fo rcfpcdcively intitled as
aforefaid, or to his, her or their attorney or
attornies for that purpofe to be efpecially ap-
Ujn.M Pnyncnt pointed in manner aforefaid, upon payment of
vt z'..cd. ^^y^ flfillings -and fixpence to the clerks, of-
ficers or C(jmmi{fioners, in order that the lame
may be forthwitii proved or inroUcd as the law
may recjuirc.
Provided
[ i"7 ]
Provided always, and it is further declared Entries to i.i
and enafted by the authority aforeGiid, That,";iVoft
whenever after the death of any fuch teflator delivery, and to
or tellatrix, any fuch will or codicil, tefta- ^^^"'^*
mentary difpofition or inflrii6tions, fhall be
delivered out of fuch office or repofitory,
the perfon or perfons, to whom the fame fliall
be delivered, fhall write his, her or their
name or names in the margin of fuch book,
oppofite to the entry thereof as aforefaid, with
fuch addition, as intitles him, her or them to
the pofleffion of fuch will, codicil, teftament-
ary difpofition or inlfruclions.
Provided neverthelefs, and it is further de- wiiistobefeai-
clared and enaeled by the authority aforefaid, ^;^f"/^]y''^" "^^'^
That all fuch wills, codicils, tcftamentary dif-
pofitions or inftruftions, fhall, before they are
ib depofited and entered as aforefaid, be co-
vered with paper or parchment, anci fealed by
the perfon or perfons depofiting the fame.
And it is further declared and enafted by The oath to be
the authority aforefaid, That the faid clerks, '"''•'" X \''.,
J _ ' . ^ o[)cii wills, till
officers or commiffioners appointed as afore- the jdiequiics
faid, and all deputies, whom they may em-"*
ploy in the execution of the faid charge, of-
fice or coip.miirion, fliall, before he or they
fhall refpe^lively ad therein, take and fub-
fcribe an oath before any one of the Judges of
his Majefly's courts of record at Weftminlter,
who are hereby authcu"ized and impowered to
adminifter the fame in the form following,
that is to fiy :
*' I A. B. do folemnly fwear, that I will
" not open, nor permit nor procure to
** be opened, any packet or parcel, con-
" taining, or fuppofed to contain, any
" will, codicil, tcftamentary difpofition
" or inftruclionSj depofited or to be de-
N " pofited
[ '78 1
" pofited in the reference office, by vir-
" tue of or under an a6l of parliament
" made and pafled in the twenty-ninth
" year of the reign of his prefen: Majefty,
" intituled, " y^n a5i for requiring the.
*^ inrolment of all deeds ^ wills and codi-
" cils relating tOy touching or affecting
*' any freehold and leajehold lands, te-
*' nements or hereditaments within the
" kingdom of England and dominion of
" IValeSy and for other purpofes therein
" mentioned/' vvhilft 1 Ihall continue to
" aft as clerk, officer or commiffioner
" thereof, (or as deputy to fuch clerk,
" officer or commifTioner) but only in
" fuch cafes in which the faid aft direfts
" the fame to be opened.
" So help me God."
Counterfeiting And it is hereby further declared and enaft-
hand^'ntings' ^^1 by the authority aforefiid. That if any perfon
of the clerks, or perfons fhall forge or counterfeit the name
*°'^^' or handwriting of any fuch officer, commif-
fioner or clerk, or his deputy or deputies, or the
ftamp or fealof the faid office, which fliall have
been made on fuch label or flip of parchment in
manner aforefaid, according to the requifitions
of and by virtue of this aft, in order to procure
the delivery or pofTeffion of any fuch will or
codicil, teftamentary difpofition or inftruc-
tions fo depofited in the faid office or repo-
fitory as aforefaid, then every fuch perfon or
perfons fo offi^^nding, being thereof lawfully
convifted, fhall be adjudged a felon or felons,
and ffiall fuller death as in cafes of felony
■without benefit of clergy.
O^/er-
li
[ '79 ]
Ohjervations upon the Draught of the Bill,
T Beg leave generally to premife, that as my pri-
mary view in this publication, was to fupply my
readers with fufficient matter, to enable them to
form a fatisfaclory judgment upon the fubjedj fo
mud I entreat them to confider the draught of the
bill as framed purpofely for the fuggeftion of
amendments by thofe, who will take it under their
confideration ; for facile eft inventis addere. The
leading principles of the bill, and the moft material
provifions in it, are the immediate confequences of
the do6lrine, which I have attempted to eftablifh.
I cannot therefore be called upon to repeat, what
may already appear to fome to have been too dif-
fufely treated \ though in didactic explanations
and arguments upon profefTional matters, written
for nonprofeffional readers, I conceive it to be
the duty of the writer to omit nothing, which can
tend to throw light upon the fubje6t.
Although it be not very ufual, I hope it will be
thought very proper, in altering and amending
a law, to repeal all afts, which afFe6t the law re-
quiring fuch alteration and amendment. There
will then arife a general afllirance and fecurity,
that nothing can affc6l the law in queftion, which
does not appear upon the face of that ad, which
undertakes openly to improve and afcertain it.
It is to be obferved, that the bill extends
the inrolment to deeds and wills affeding all lands,
(except copyhold and cuftomary lands); for as
they are always paffed or affeded with notoriety in
the manor court, which generally is attended with
N 2 fomc
[ i8o ]
fome benefit or advantage to the lord of the
manor, it will not be found juft nor reafonable to
infringe the private rights of individuals by fuper-
inducing a public neceffity over the private requi-
fition, from v^'hich the benefit arofe to the indivi-
dual. But there cannot be a fhadov/ of pretence,
why the inrolment (hould not affeft leajehold, as
well as freehold lands ; for there certainly may be
more opening to fraudulent and clandeftine pre-
conveyances and deceit, in the paffing, altering
and changing of leafehold, than of freehold eftates,
becaufe at prtfcnt lefs notoriety attends the former
than the latter.
The payments direfted to be made to the per-
fons figning the warrants, 7?^/-f, or dire6lions for in-
rolment, are regulated according to the prefent
ufa^ies ; and in the fame proportion all the other
payments throughout the bill are framed.
The provifions made for fecuring the proper
number of ftamps to each deed and v/ill inrolled,
is a matter which affcds the finance, m.ore than the
reoulation of the law of the country. There can-
not be a doubt, but that the legiflature in pafling
the 20:h of his prtfent Majefty meant, that there
ihould be a ftamp for each fl<;in of fifteen common
law llicets ; and it is well known by experience and
praftice, that ftveral of the mofl reputable perfons
of the profclTion, make it a general pradice to in-
fcrt a grc ater number of words in the fliin under
one (lamp, than evidently the ad: of parliament in-
tencVd flioidd be allowed or permitted. This aifb^
which undertakes to regulate and afcertain the
matter, docs not pofitively enacSl, that fuch a quan-
tity of words fliall be coiifined to one ftamp ; but
that, if any perf^.n having charged his client for in-
grolTing m.ore, than fifteen common law folios un-
der one ilamp, Ihall be oix'n to an information, and
' ^ liable
[ ,8i ]
liable to a penalty of twenty pounds. Novy, as
mod deeds at preient are fecret conveyances, and
not expofed to public infpeftion, this is a matter,
which ieldom extends beyond the knowledge and
privacy of the Ibllicitor and client; but how
impoflible is it, that the former fliould lodge an
information to profit of his own inattention to or
nonobfervance of the law ? And how improbable,
that the latter fhould inform againft his own folli^
citor, for having favcd him a confidcrable expence
by evading the duty upon fhamps? The only
fecure method of compelling perfons to ufe a pro-
per number oi ftamps to a given number of
words, is by invalidating the deed, if it be not
properly ftamped : diis would give occafion to
much altercation and fufpicion amongft indivi-
duals, if it were made to depend upon their fcru-
tiny and judgment ; therefore the clerks of the in-
rolment office, are made the judges of the fa6t,
and their judgment is rendered liable to very heavy
penalties, upon information within a reafonable
limitation of time. The vigilance therefore of the
clerks will prevent the revenue from being injured,
and the a6tual inrohiient of deeds, wills and codi-
cils, will fecure individuals from any rifk or danger
of their becoming invalid, from a want of the pro-
per number of ftamps.
As die credibility and refponfibilityof the officers,
clerks or commiffioners of the different cou-ts or
offices, are objefts which ought to be well attend-
ed to, and as all popular elections are conftantly
attended with diflention, diffipation, and m.any other
difadvanrao;es and inconvcniencies, I have vcn-
tured to fuggeft a new mode of election, upon this
principle, that a perfon chofen by the majority of the
reprefentatives o: the country, will be more imparti-
9,lly and quietly elcded, than in any other manner:
for
[ >82 J
tor it is to be prefiimedj that party influence, familr
and pecuniary confidcrations, or other private vievv's
of partiality, will not operate fo forcibly upon the
members of parliament, as they maybe fuppof^d to
do upon other individuals, more clofely conneded
with the perfons likely to be chofen.
It would be harfli and unjutl to deprive the pre-
fcnt Yorkfhire regiftcrs of their appoiriLments; and
if reafonable for others, it would be abfurd net to
have this county adopt the general mode of elec^
tion in future.
If, however, this mode of election be not re-
lifhed, there is nothing more eafy, than to fubftitute
that in its lieu, which now prevails in the county of
York.
As to Middlefex, as the officers and clerks arc
now in the nomiination of the heads of the four
courts of records, it would be very unjuft and un-
warrantable to deprive fuch refpeftable charadters,
as fill thefe employs, of that patronage,, which has
iifually been annexed to th.eir ofnces ; and as in fu-
ture more bufinefs will certainly come through thefe
offices by the inrolment, than by the regiftry of
deeds and wills, the patronage v;ill be proportiour
ably greater, than it has heretofore been.
As London is the center of mioft money tranfac-
tlons negociated in this nation, it is needlefs to ftate
a reafon, why a reference office fhould be fixed
there, rather than in any other place j and the pro-
priety of its txiftence will fully appear, from the
many occafions, which occur in London of fearch-
ing for the inrolment of deeds and wills inrolled in
diftant counties ; and much delay, doubt, and ex-
pence will be avoided, by the order and regularitj'
of fuch reference books : there is no public office
or confervatory, which has not within itfelf fuch
books of reference i die utility and advantage of
which.
[ 1^3 ]
vvhich, are fdlly known and felt by all perfons, who
have occafion to make fearches amongfl; public
archives and records. 1 fhall then lay no more
upon the fiibjeil, than that, if there be county
i'nrolment offices, or courts eftablifhed, there fliould
alfo be national books of reference to them, in or-
der, as much as poffible, to concenter into one point
the whole knowledge, that is intended and required
to be conveyed to the public, by recording all deeds
and wills affeding lands.
I know many inilances, in which wills have been
fuppreflcd after the deaths of the teftators, by the
perfons, into whofe poffefiion they fell ; but I need
not enter into a detail of the very ferious confe-
quences, which may thereby happen to the perfons
intereiled under fuch wills. Many cafes have hap-
pened, and poffibly many more may happen, in
which wills have been, and may be altered, miflaid
and deftroyed, wilfully and by accident. And
therefore, as I have endeavoured to fuggefl: a plan
of general pradlical utility, refped:ing deeds and
devifes, I have confidered it as an extenfion of that
plan, to provide a fafe confervatory, v/here all per-
fons expofed to travel, either by fea or land, having
no fixt refidence, or no fecure repofitory within that
refidence, or diffiding in thofe, who either during
their lives, or after their deaths, may have accefs
to their private papers, may depofit their wills with
fafety, where they will be preferved in fecrecy, and
from whence they will be delivered out to fuch
perfons only, who will be intitled to receive them.
As there is no eftabliHiment of the nature elfewhere
in the kingdom, I have from my own ideas, endea-
voured to chalk out a plan of fuch order, regu-
larity, and conveniency in it, as I think will bed
anfwer the intended purpofes.
2 Coa-
[ i84 J
Convinced as I am, and long have been, that
a general Inrohnent A61 will be of very effen-
tial benefit to the nation, I claim that indulgence
from my readers, which a generous public will ever
allow to every krious atteinpt to ferve one's coun-
try ; to do which will ever be the firft ambition of
my life.
F I N J S.
LAW LT^.RARY
UNIVEUSn Y OK C AiJFORNLi
LOS ANGELES
I ir 901 iTHFRNj RFOIONAI LIBRARY FACILITY
|illillllllllllllillii>llillililil'><''''
AA 000 858 118 3