THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE LETTERS OF MLLE. DE LESPINASSE Mlle. Julie de Lespinasse LETTERS ' OF MLLE. DE LESPINASSE litt Notes on \)a ILiit ant CI)aracta: BY D'ALEMBERT, MARMONTEL, DE GUIBERT, Etc AND AN INTRODUCTION BY C.-A. SAINTE-BEUVE TRANSLATED BY KATHARINE PRESCOIT WORMELEY. BOSTON: HARDY, PRATT & COMPANY. 1903. i/yt/// *? Copyright 1901, By Hardy, Pratt & Company. All rights reserved. ^SnttoErsitg Press: John Wilson and Son, Cambridge, U. S. A. CONTENTS. Page Introduction. By C.-A. Sainte-Beuve 1 Notes on the Life and Character of Mlle. de Lespi- NASSE. By Grimm, Marmontel, La Harpe, etc. . . 21 Letters from Mlle. de Lespinasse to M. de Guibert . 42 Portrait of Julie-Jeanne-El^onore de Lespinasse. By D'Alembert 299 Eulogy of Eliza. By M. de Guibert 310 To the Manes of Mlle. de Lespinasse. By D'Alembert 326 Letters from Frederick the Great, King of Prussia, Voltaire, and D'Alembert, on the Death of Mlle. DE Lespinasse 332 INTRODUCTION. By C.-A. SAINTE-BEUVE. The claims of Mile, de Lespinasse to the attention of poster- ity are positive and durable. At the moment of her death she was universally regretted, as having, without name, without fortune, without beauty, created for herself the salon most in vogue, most eagerly frequented at an epoch which counted so many that were brilliant. Still, this flattering chorus of regi'ets given to the memory of the friend of d'Alembert would have left but a vague and presently receding idea of her, if the publication of her Letters, made in 1809, had not revealed her under an aspect wholly different, and shown, no longer the charmmg person dear to society, but the woman of heart and passion, the burning and self-consuming victim. This volume of Letters from Mile, de Lespinasse to the Comte de Guibert is one of the most curious and most memorable monuments to passion. In 1820 another volume, under the title of " Nouveaux Lettres de Mile, de Lespinasse," was published, which is not hers ; it is unworthy of her mind and of her heart ; being as flat and insipid as the other is distinguished, or, to say it better, unique. I beg- my read- ers not to confound that volume of 1820 (a speculation and fabrication of publishers) with the Letters given to the world in 1809, the only ones that deserve confidence, and of which I desire to speak. These love-letters, addressed to M. de Guibert, were pub- lished by the widow of M. de Guibert, assisted in the work 1 2 INTRODUCTION. by Barrfere, the Barrfere of the Terror, neither more nor less, who, as we know, loved literature, especially that of senti- ment. Wlien the Letters appeared there was great emotion in society, several of the friends of Mile, de Lespinasse being still alive at that date. They deplored the indiscreet publi- cation ; they blamed the conduct of the editors, who thus dishonoured, they said, the memory of a woman until then respected, and betrayed her secret to all, without the right to do so. They appealed to both morality and decency ; they invoked the very fame of Mile, de Lespinasse. Nevertheless, they eagerly enjoyed the reading of the Letters, which far sur- passed in interest the most ardent romances, being, in truth, a " Nouvelle H(^loise " in action. To-day jjosterity, indifferent to personal considerations, sees only the book, and classes it in the series of immortal paintings and testimonies of passion, of which there is not so great a number that we cannot count them. Antiquity gives us Sappho for certain accents, certain sighs of fire that come to us athwart the ages ; it has given us the " Phcedra " of Euripides, the " Magician " of Theocritus, the " Medea " of Apollonius of Ehodes, the " Dido " of Virgil, the "Ariadne" of Catullus. Among moderns we have the Latin Letters of H^loise, those of the Portuguese nun, " Manou Lescaut," the " Ph^dre " of Eacine, and a few other rare pro- ductions, among which the Letters of Mile, de Lespinasse are in the first rank. Oh ! if the late Barr^re had never done worse in his life than publish these Letters, if he had had no greater burden on his conscience we would say to-day, absolv- ing him with all our heart, " May the earth lie light upon him ! " Here is an anecdote which I possess from the original. At the time when these Letters appeared, a brilliant society had gathered at the baths of Aix in Savoie. Some of the party had gone to visit Chamb^ry ; on their return one of the INTRODUCTION. 3 carriages was occupied by Mme. de Stael, Benjamin Constant, Mme. de Boigne, Adrien de Montmorency, etc. During the drive a series of accidents occurred — tempest, thunder and lightning, hindrances and dela}-s of all kinds. On arriving at Aix the persons in the carriage found the people of the hotel grouped at the door, very anxious and inquiring. But they, the travellers, had seen nothing, and noticed nothing of the accidents without, for Mme. de Stael had talked the whole time, and her topic was the Letters of Mile, de Lespi- nasse and M. de Guibert, who had been her own first lover. The life of Mile, de Lespinasse began early in being a romance, and more than a romance. She was the natural daughter of the Comtesse d'Albon, a lady of condition in Burgundy, whose legitimate daughter had manied the brother of the Marquise du Deffand. It was at the house of this brother, the Marquis de Vichy-Chamrond, in Burgundy, that Mme. du Deffand found the yoimg girl, then twenty j'ears of age, oppressed, assigned to inferior domestic duties, and kept in a condition that was wholly dependent. She took a fancy to her at once ; or rather, they took a fancy to each other, and we can readily conceive it ; if we look only to the value of minds, it is seldom that chance brings together two more distinguished. Mme. du Deffand had no peace until she had drawn the young girl from her province and installed her with herself at the convent of Saint-Joseph, as her companion and reader, intending to make of her a perpetual resource. The family of the young girl's mother had, however, a strong fear, namely : that she might profit by her new position and the protectors she would find in society to claim the name of Albon and 'her share of the inheritance. She might have done so, in fact ; for she was born during the lifetime of M. d'Albon, the husband of her mother, and the law recognizes 4 INTRODUCTION. all such children as legitimate. Mme. du Deffand thought it right to take precautions, and dictated to her, with little deli- cacy, certain conditions on this point before permitting her to come to her ; for one who appreciated so well the young girl's mind it was knowing very little of her heart. This arrangement of a life in common was made in 1754, and it lasted till 1764 : ten years of household companion- ship and concord ; a long period, longer than could have been hoped between two minds so equal in quality and associated with elements so impetuous. But finally, Mme. du Deft'and, who rose late and was never afoot before six in the evening, discovered that her young companion was receiving in her private room, a good hour earlier, most of her own habitual visitors, thus taking for herself the first-fruits of their con- versation. Mme. du Deffand felt herself defrauded of her most cherished rights, and uttered loud outcries, as if it were a matter of domestic robbery. The storm was terrible, and could only end in a rupture. Mile, de Lespinasse left the convent of Saint-Joseph abruptly ; her friends clubbed to- gether to make her a salon and a subsistence in the rue de Belle-Chasse. These friends were d'Alembert, Turgot, the Chevalier de Chastellux, Lom^nie de Brienne, the future archbishop and cardinal, Boisgelin, Archbishop of Aix, the Abb^ de Boismont, — in short, the flower of the minds of that day. This brilliant colony followed the emigrant spirit and her fortunes. From that moment Mile, de Lespinasse lived apart and became, through her salon and through her influ- ence on d'Alembert, one of the recognized powers of the eighteenth century. Happy days ! when all life turned to sociability ; when all was arranged for the gentlest commerce of minds and for the best conversation. Not a vacant day, not a vacant hour ! If you were a man of letters and more or less of a philosopher. INTRODUCTION. 5 here is the regular employment you could make of your week : Sunday and Thursday, dinner with Baron d'Holbach ; Mon- day and Wednesday, dinner with Mme. Geoffrin ; Tuesday, dinner with M. Helv^tius ; Friday, dinner with Mme. Necker. I do not mention the Sunday breakfasts of the Abbd Morellet ; those, I think, came a little later. Mile, de Lespinasse, hav- ing no means to give dinners and suppers, was punctually at home from five to nine o'clock, and her circle assembled every day during those hours of the " early evening." What she was as mistress of her salon and as a bond of society before, and even after, the invasion and delirium of her fatal passion, all the Memoirs of the time will tell us. She was much attached to d'Alembert, illegitimate like her- self, who (like herself again) had proudly forborne to seek for rights which tenderness had failed to give him. D'Alem- bert was then lodging with his foster-mother, the worthy wife of a glazier, in the rue Michel-le-Comte, which was far from the rue de Belle-Cliasse. A serious illness seized him, during which Mile, de Lespinasse took care of him, induced the doctors to order him to live in better air, and finally decided him to come to her. From that day they made one household, but in all honour and propriety, so that no one ever gossiped to the contrary. D'AlemberVs life became much easier, and the respect paid to Mile, de Lespinasse was thereby increased. Mile, de Lespinasse was not pretty ; but through mind, through grace, through the gift of pleasing, Nature had amply compensated her. From the first day when she came to Paris she seemed as much at her ease and as little provincial as if she had lived here all her life. She profited by the edu- cation of the excellent society that surrounded her, although she had little need to do so. Her great art in social life, one of the secrets of her success, was to feel the minds of others, 6 INTRODUCTION. to make them shine, and to seem to forget herself. Her con- versation was neitlier above nor below those with whom she talked ; she had the sense of measurement, proportion, accu- racy. She reflected so well the impressions of others, and received so visibly the effect of their minds, that others loved her for the success they felt they had with her. She raised this method to an art. "Ah! how I wish," she exclaimed one day, " that I knew everybody's weakness." D'Alembert fastened on the words and blamed them, as proceeding from too great a desire to please, and to please every one. But even in that desire, and in the means it suggested to her she re- mained true, she was sincere. She said of herself, in expla- nation of her success with others that she held the " truth of all \_le vrai de tout], while other women held the truth of nothing \lc vrai de rien]." In conversing she had the gift of the right word, the instinct for the exact and choicest expression ; common and trivial expressions disgusted her ; she was shocked, and could not recover herself. She was not precisely simple, though very natural. It was the same with her clothes. " She gave," some one said, " an idea of richness which by taste and choice was vowed to simplicity." Her literary taste was more lively \_vif] than sure ; she loved, she adored Racine, as master of the heart, but for all that she did not like the over-finished, she preferred the rough and sketchy. Whatever caught her by an inward fibre excited and uplifted her ; she could even have mercy on a worthless book for one or two situations in it which went to her soul. She has imitated Sterne in a couple of chapters which are worth little. As a writer, where she does not dream of being one, that is to say Ln her Letters, her pen is clear, firm, excellent, except for a few words such as sensitive, virtuous, which are repeated too often, and show the influence of Je^in-Jacques. INTRODUCTION. 7 But never any commonplaceness, never declamation ; all is from the living spring, from nature. Let us come at once to her principal claim, to her glory of loving woman. In spite of her tender friendship for d'Alembert, a friendship which was doubtless a little more at its origin, we may say that Mile, de Lespinasse loved but twice in her life : she loved M. de Mora and M. de Guibert. It is the struggle of these two passions, the one expiring but powerful still, the other whelming-in and soon to be paramount, it is this violent and desperate combat which constitutes the heart-rending drama to which the publication of these Letters initiates us. The contemporaries of Mile, de Lespinasse, her nearest and best informed friends knew nothing of it. Condorcet, writing to Turgot, often speaks of her and tells him of her nervous attacks, but without appear- ing to suspect their cause; those who, like Marmontel, divined some trouble, were wholly on the wrong scent as to dates and sentiments. D'Alembert himself, so concerned in seeing clearly, knew the mystery only on reading certain papers after her death. Therefore we must seek the truth as to the secret sentiments of Mile, de Lespinasse from her own avowals, from herself alone. She had loved M. de Mora for five or six years, when she met for the first time M. de Guibert. The Marquis de Mora was the son of the Comte de Fuent^s, ambassador from Spain to the Co\u-t of France. All things prove that, although still young, he was a man of superior merit and destined to a great future had he lived. As to this, we have not only the assurance of Mile, de Lespinasse, but that of others least subject to infatuation among his contempo- raries ; the Abbe Galiani, for instance, learning in Naples of his death, writes to Mme. d'Epinay (June 18, 1774): "I dare not speak of Mora. I have mourned him long. All is 8 INTRODUCTION. destined iu this world, and Spain was not worthy to possess a M. de Mora." And again (July 8th) : " There are lives on which depend the fate of empires. Hannibal, when he heard of the defeat and death of his brother Hasdrubal, a man of greater worth than himself, did not weep, but he said, ' Now I know what will be the fate of Carthage.' I say the same on the death of M. de ]\Iora." M. de Mora came to France about the year 1766; it was then that Mile, de Lespinasse knew him and loved him. He was absent at various times, but always returned to her. Finally, his lungs were attacked and his native climate was ordered for him. He left Paris, never to re-enter it, on Friday, August 7, 1772. Mile, de Lespinasse, philosopher and freethinker none the less, was on one point as supersti- tious as any Spanish woman, as any loving woman ; and she did not fail to note that having quitted Paris on a Friday, it was on a 'Friday also that he left Madrid (May 6, 1774), and that he died at Bordeaux on Friday, the 27th of the same month. When he left Paris the passion of Mile, de Les- pinasse for him and that which he returned to her had never been more ardent. An idea of it may be gained from the fact that during a journey which M. de Mora made to Fontainebleau in the autumn of 1771 he wrote twenty-two letters to her in ten days of absence. Matters were estab- lished on this tone, and the pair had parted with every promise and every pledge between them, when Mile, de Les- pinasse, in the month of September, 1772, met the Comte de Guibert for the first time, at Moulin-Joh, the country- house of M. Watelet. M. de Guibert, then about twenty-nine years of age, was a young colonel for whom society had lately roused itself to a pitch of enthusiasm. He had recently published an " Essay on Tactics," preceded by a survey of the state of political and INTRODUCTION. 9 military science in Europe. In it were generous, or as we should say in these clays, advanced ideas. He discussed the great Frederick's system of war. He competed at the Acade- my on subjects of patriotic eulogj- ; he had tragedies in his desk on national subjects. " He aims at nothing less," said La Harpe, " than replacing Turenne, Corneille, and Bossuet." It would be very easy at this date, but not very just, to make a caricature of M. de Guibert, a man whom every one, begin- ning with Voltaire, considered at his dawn as vowed to glory and grandeur, and who kept the pledge so insufficiently. Abortive hero of that epoch of Louis XVL which gave France naught but promises, M. de Guibert entered the world, his head high and on the footing of a genius ; it was, so to speak, his speciality to have genius, and you will not find a writer of his day who does not use the word in rela- tion to him. " A soul," they cried, " which springs on all sides towards fame." This was an attitude difficult to maintain, and the fall, at last, was all the more bitter to him. Let us admit, however, that a man who could be loved to such a point by Mile, de Lespuiasse, and who, subsequentl}", had the honour of first occupying the heart of Mme. de Stael, must have had those eager, animated qualities which belong to personality, and mislead the judgment as to deeds so long as their father is present. M. de Guibert had the qualities that exhilarate, excite, and impress ; he had his full value in a brilliant cir- cle ; but he chilled quickly and was out of place in the bosom of intimacy. In the order of sentiments he had the emotion, the tumult, the din of passion, but not its warmth. Mile, de Lespinasse, who ended by judging him as he was and by estimating his just weight wrthout being able to cease loving him, began, in the first instance, by admiration. " Love," it is said, " begins usually by admhation, and it sur- Lb INTRODUCTION. vives esteem with difficulty, or rather, it does not survive it, except in prolonging its existence by convulsions." Here, in her, is the history of that fatal passion ; the degrees of which were so rapid that we can scarcely distinguish them. She was then {must we tell it ?) nearly forty years old. She was bitterly regretting the departure of M. de Mora — that true man of delicacy and feelmg, that truly superior man — when she involved herself in loving M. de Guibert, the false great man, but who was present and seductive. Her first letter is dated Saturday evening, May 15, 1773. M. de Gui- bert was about to start on a long journey through Germany, Prussia, and, possibly, Russia. We have his own printed " Relation " of this journey, and it is curious to put these witty, practical, often instructive and sometimes emphatic and sentimental notes side by side with the letters of his ardent friend. Before he departs he has already done her some wrong. He had said he would leave Tuesday, May 18th, then Wednesday, but he did not start till Thursday, the 20th, and his friend knew nothing of it. It is evident that she was not the one to receive his last thought, his last farewell. She suffers already, and blames herself for suffering ; she has just received a letter from M. de Mora, full of confidence in her love ; she is ready to sacrifice everything to him, " but," she adds, " for the last two months I have had no sacrifice to make to him." She thinks she still loves M. de Mora ; that she can stop and immolate at will the new feeling which de- taclies and drags her away from him. M. de Mora absent, ill, faithful, writes to her, and each letter reopens her wound and quickens her remorse. What will it be when, returning to her, he falls ill and dies on his way at Bordeaux ? Thus, until the end, we find her torn in her delirium between the need, the desire to die for M. de Mora, and the desire to live for M. de Guibert. " Do you conceive, mo7i ami, the species INTRODUCTION. 11 of torture to which I am condemned ? I have remorse for what I give you, and regrets for what I am forced to with- hold." But this is only the beginning of it all.^ M. de Guibert, who is much in vogue, and something of a coxcomb, leaves behind him, when he goes upon his journey, more than one regret, ^^^e tind there are two women, one whom he loves, who responds but little, the other who loves him, but does not occupy him much. Mile, de Lespinasse takes an interest in these persons, in one especially, and she tries to glide between the two. But what of that ? when the heart loves utterly it is not proud, and she tells herself, with Felix in " Polyeucte," — "I enter upon feelings that are not believable; Some I have are violent, others are pitiable, I have even some . . ." She dares not conclude with Corneille, " some that are base." She asks to be given a place apart, for herself ; she does not yet know what place. " Let us decide our ranks" she says. " Give me my place, but, as I do not like to change, give me a good one. I do not wish that of this unhappy woman, who is displeased with you ; nor that of the other, with whom you are displeased. I do not know where you will place me, but do so, if possible, that we may both be content : do not bargain ; grant me much ; you shall see that I will not abuse it. Oh ! you shall see that I know how to love ! I can but love, I know only how to love." Here begins the eternal note, and it never ceases. To love 1 The Letters are addressed tliroughout to " men ami," which cannot here be translated as " my friend : " the consonants themselves forbid it, also the limited meaning of the English word in its general use. Conse- quently; the soft French word, with more love in it, is retained in the following translation. — Tr, 12 INTRODUCTION. * — that is her lot. Phsedra, Sappho, and Dido had none more complete, more fatal. Slie deceives herself when she says : " I have a strength, or a faculty, which makes me equal to everything : it is that of knowing how to suffer, and to suffer much without complaint." She knows how to suffer, but she does complain, she cries aloud, slie passes in the twinkling of an eye from exaltation to dejection : " What shall I say to you ? the excess of my inconsistency bewilders my mind, and the weight of life is crushing my soul. What must I do ? What shall I become ? Will it be Charenton or the grave that shall deliver me from myself ? " She counts the letters she receives ; her life depends on the postman : " There is a certain carrier who for the last year gives fever to my soul." To calm herself while waiting and expecting, to obtain the sleep that flees her, she finds nothing better than recourse to opium, of which we find her doubling the doses with the progress of her woe. \^^iat matters to her the destiny of other women, those women of society, wdio " for the most part feel no need of being loved ; all they want is to be jyre.f erred " ? As for her, what she wants is to be loved, or rather, to love, even without return : " You do not know all that I am worth ; reflect that I can suffer and die ; judge from that if I resemble those other women, who know how to please and amuse." In vain does she cry out now and then : " Oh ! I hate you for giving me the knowledge of hope, fear, pain, pleasure ; I did not need those emotions ; why did you not leave me in peace ? My soul had no need to love ; it was filled by a tender sentiment, deep, and shared, responded to, though sorrowful in parting. It was the impul- sion of that soiTOW that took me to you ; I meant that you should please me only, but you did more ; in consoling me you bound me to you." In vain does she curse the violent feeling which has taken the place of an equable and gentler INTRODUCTION. 13 sentiment ; her soul is so grasped, so ardent that she cannot keep from transports, as it were, of intoxication : " I live, I exist with such force that there are moments when I find myself loving to madness and to my own misery." So long as M. de Guibert is absent she restrains herself a little — if it can be called restraint. He returns, however, at the end of October, 1773, after being distinguished by the great Frederick and taking part in the manoeuvres of the camp in Silesia ; thus acquiring a fresh resplendency. Here, with a little attention, it is impossible not to note a decisive moment, a moment we must veil, which corresponds to that of the grotto in Dido's episode. ^ A year later, in a letter from Mile, de Lespinasse dated midnight (1775) we find these words, which leave but little room for doubt : " It was on the 10th of February of last year (1774) that I was intoxicated by a poison the effect of which lasts to this day. . . ." She continues this delirious and doleful commemoration, in which the image, the spectre, of M. de Mora, dying on his way to her, mingles with the nearer and more charming image which wraps her in a fatal attraction. From this moment passion is at its height, and there is scarcely a page in the Letters that is not all flame. Scrupu- lous persons, though they read and relish them, blame M. de Guibert severely for not having returned them to j\Ille. de Lespinasse, who frequently asked for them. It appears, in 1 Her letters do not seem to bear out this conclusion. The close intimacy with the personality of a writer that comes, in the work of translation, from the necessary scrutiny of his or her words and thoughts and habitual method of expressing them gives — to the translator at least — ground for doubting this opinion. It may be true ; but a Frenchman's mind, even that of Sainte-Beuve, seems unable to escape from this line of judgment. If it is not true, tlie soul's tragedy is far greater. IMUe. de Lespinasse uses plain, clear language, which reveals tlie passion of her nature simply ; when she speaks of "remorse " for her infidelity to M. de Mora, she is ex- pressing the extreme, perliaps excessive, honour, delicacy, and sensitiveness of her spirit. — Tr. 14 INTRODUCTION. fact, that order and attention were not among the number of M. de Guibert's good qualities ; he takes no care of his friend's letters : he mingles them with his other papers, he drops them from his pocket by mistake, while at the same time he forgets to seal his own. Sometimes he returns them to her, bu.t among the number returned some are not hers ! In that we see M. de Guibert undisguised. Nevertheless, I do not know why he should be held responsible and guilty to-day for the pleasure we derive from these Letters. He doubtless returned many, and many were destroyed. But Mile, de Lespinasse wrote many. It is but a handful, preserved by chance, which have come to us. What matter ? the thread of the stor}^ is there, and it suffices. Throughout, they are almost one and the same letter, ever novel, ever unexpected, beginning afresh. Amid their anguish, their plaints, one word, the divine eternal word, returns again and again and redeems all. Here is one of her letters in two lines which says more than many words : — "From every instant of my life, 1774. "Mon ami, — I suffer, I love you, I await you." It is very rare in France to meet (pushed to this degree) with the class of passion and " sacred ill " of which Mile, de Lespinasse was the victim. This is not a reproach that I make — God forbid ! — to the amiable women of our nation ; it is a simple remark, which others have made before me. A moralist of the eighteenth century who knew his times, M. de Meilhan, has said, " In France, great passions are as rare as great men." M. de Mora declared that even the Spanish women could not enter into comparison with his friend. " Oh ! they are not worthy to be your pupils," he tells her constantly ; " your soul was warmed by the sun of Lima, but INTRODUCTION. 15 my compatriots seem born beneath the snows of Lapland." And it was from Madrid that he wrote it ! He found her comparable to none but a Peruvian, daughter of the Sun. " To love and suffer," she cries, " Heaven or Hell ; to that I would vow myself; it is that I would feel; that is the climate I desire to inhahit ; " and she pities the women who live and vegetate in a milder air and flirt their fans around her. "I have known only the climate of Hell, rarely that of Heaven." " Ah ! my God ! " she says again, " how natural passion is to me, and how foreign is reason ! Mon ami, never did any one reveal herself with such abandonment." It is this abandonment, this total unre- serve which is the interest and the excuse of the mental situation, the sincerest and the most deplorable that ever betrayed itself to the eye. This situation of soul is so visibly deplorable that we may look upon it, I think, without danger ; so inherent is the sense of malady, so plainly do delirium, frenzy, agony disclose them- selves pell-mell. While admiring a nature capable of this powerful manner of feelmg, we are tempted as we read to pray that Heaven would turn from us and from those we love so invincible a fatality, so terrible a thunderbolt. I shall try to note the course of this passion, as much, at least, as it is possible to note down that which was irregularity and contradiction itself. Before the journey of M. de Guibert to German}^, Mile, de Lespinasse loved him, but had not yielded to her love. She admired him, she was filled with enthusiasm, already she suftered cruelly and made poison of everything. He returns, she intoxicates herself, she yields ; then follows remorse ; she judges him correctly ; she sees with terror his indifference ; she sees him as he is — a man of flourish, of vanity, of suc- cess ; not a man for intimacy, having, above all, a need for 16 INTRODUCTION. expansion; excited, animated by things from without, but never deeply emotional. But of what use is it to become clear-sighted ? Did a woman's mind, great as it may be, ever check her heart ? " The mind of most women serves to strengthen their folly rather than their reason ! " La Kochefoucauld says that, and Mile, de Lespinasse proves the truth of it. She continued to love M. de Guibert, all the while judging him. She suffers more and more ; she appeals to him and chides him with a mixture of irritation and tenderness : " Fill my soul, or cease to torture it ; make me to love you always, or to be as though I had never loved you — in short, do the impossible; calm me, or I die ! " Instead of that, he harms her ; with his natural careless- ness he finds a way to wound even her self-love. She compares him to M. de Mora ; she blushes for him, for herself, at the difference between them : " And it is you who have made me guilty towards that man ! the thought revolts my soul, and I turn away from it." Repentance, hatred, jealousy, re- morse, contempt of herself, and sometimes of him — she suf- fers at all moments the tortures of the damned. To deaden them, to distract her mind, to make truce with her sufferings, she has recourse to many things. She tries " Tancrfede," which touches her ; she thinks it beautiful, but nothing is on the key of her own soul. She has recourse to opium to suspend her life and numb her sensibilities. Sometimes she makes a resolution to no longer open the letters she receives ; she keeps one, sealed, for six days. There are days, weeks, when she thinks herself almost cured, re- stored to reason, to calmness ; she extols reason and its sweetness ; but her calmness is merely an illusion. Her passion counterfeited death only to revive more ardent, more inflamed than ever. She regrets no longer her de- INTRODUCTION. 17 ceitful, insipid calmness. " I lived," she says, " but I seemed to be apart from myself." She tells M. de Guibert that she hates him, but we know what that means : " You know well that when I hate you it is that I love you to a degree of pas- sion that overthrows my reason." Her life is thus passed in loving, hating, fainting, reviving, dying ; that is to say, in ever loving. Each crisis ends by a pardon, a reconciliation, a closer and more violent clasp. M. de Guibert thinks of his fortune and his establishment ; she concerns herself with them for his sake. Yes, she con- cerns herself about his marriage. When he marries (for he has the face to many in the very midst of this passion) she takes an interest in it ; she praises the young wife, whom she meets. Alas ! it may be to that generous praise that we owe the preservation of these Letters, which ought in those rival hands to have been annihilated. It might be supposed that this marriage of M. de Guibert would end all ; the noble, de- mented soul thinks so herself ; but no ! passion laughs at social impossibilities and barriers. She continues, therefore, in spite of all, to love M. de Guibert, without asking more of him than to let himself be loved= After many struggles, the last day finds their intercourse restored as though nothing had been broken between them. But she feels her- self dying ; she redoubles the use of opium ; she desires to live only from day to day, without a future — has passion a future ? " I feel the need of being loved to-day, and only to- day ; let us blot from our dictionary the words ' alwaj^s ' and ' forever.' " The last of these Letters are but a piercing cry, with rare intermissions. One could scarcely imagine into what inex- haustible forms she puts the same sentiment; the river of fire o'erflows at every step in flashing torrents. Let us give the summary in her own language : — 2 18 INTRODUCTION. " All these many contradictions, these many impulses are true, and three words explain them : / love you." Eemark that amid this, life of exhaustion and delirium, Mile, de Lespinasse is in society ; she receives lier friends as usual ; she amazes them at times by her variable humour, but they attribute this change to her regrets at the absence, and then at the death, of M. de Mora. " They do me the honour to believe that I am crushed by the loss that 1 have met with." They praised her and admired her for it, which redoubled her shame. Poor d'Alembert, who li\^ed in the same house, endeavoured vainly to console her, to amuse her ; he never comprehended why she repulsed him now and then with a sort of horror. Alas ! it was the horror she felt at her own dissimulation with such a friend. The long agony had its ending at last. She died on the 23d of May, 1776, at the age of forty-three years and six months. Her passion for M. de Guibert had lasted for more than three years. Amid this consuming passion, which seems as though it could admit no other element, do not suppose that these Let- ters fail to show the charming mind which was joined to this noble heart. What delicate jesting as she writes of the "good" Condorcet, the Chevalier de Chastellux, Chamfort, and others of her society ! What gi-ace ! Lofty and gen- erous sentiments, patriotism and virility of views, are re- vealed in more places than one, and make us appreciate the worthy friend of Turgot and of Malesherbes. When she talks with Lord Shelburne she feels what is grand and vivi- fying for thought in being born under a free Government : " How can we not be grieved at being born under a Govern- ment like ours ? As for me, weak and unhappy creature that I am, if I were born again, I would rather be the lowest member of the House of Commons than the King of Prussia INTRODUCTION. 19 himself." Little disposed as she was to augur any good of the future, she has a moment of transport and hope when she sees her friends made ministers and putting their hands bravely to the work of public regeneration. But even then, what is it that preoccupies her most ? She orders her letters from M. de Guibert to be brought to her wherever she may be, — at Mme. Geoffrin's, at M. Tur- got's even, at table, and during dinner. " What are you reading so earnestly ? " asked a neighbour, the inquisitive Mme. de Boufflers. " Is it some paper for M. Turgot ? " " Precisely, madame," she replies ; " it is a memorial I must give him presently, and I wish to read it before I give it to him." Thus, all things in her life relate to passion, all things bring her back to it ; and it is passion alone which gives us the key to this strange heart and struggling destiny. The incalculable merit of the Letters of Mile, de Lespinasse is that we do not find in them what we find in books and novels ; here we have the pure drama of nature, such as it reveals itself, now and then, in certain gifted beings ; the surface of life is suddenly torn apart and the life itself is bared to us. It is impossible to encounter such beings, victims of a sacred passion and capable of so generous a woe, without being moved to a sentiment of respect and admi- ration in the midst of the profound pity which they inspire. Nevertheless, if we are wise we shall not envy them ; we shall prefer a calmer interest, gently quickened ; we shall cross the Tuileries (as she did one beautiful sunny morning) and say with her : " Oh ! how lovely ! how divine this weather ! the air I breathe is calming — I love, I regret, I desire, but all those sentiments have won the imprint of sweetness and melancholy. Ah ! this manner of feeling has greater charm than the ardour and throes of passion ! Yes, 20 INTRODUCTION. I believe I am disgusted with them ; I will no longer love so forcibly ; I will love gently — " Yet a moment later she adds, " but never feebly." The pangs are seizing her again. Ah, no ! those who have tasted that poison once are never cured. NOTES ON THE LIFE AND CHARACTER OF MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. The mysteries surrounding Mile, de Lespinasse from her birth to her grave, and beyond it, have given rise to so many false conjectures that it seems well to bring together the undoubted facts of her life, disengaged from such conjectures and from those statements of her nearest friends which are now known to have been mistaken. The following Notes are taken from the Introduction written by M. Eugfeue Assd for his edition of the " Letters " published in 1876, and from the letters and other writings of her friends published in the same volume, also from : — The " (Euvres " of d'Alembert. Paris. An xiii (1805). The " Memoires " of Marmontel. Paris. 1804. The " Correspondence Litteraire " of La Harpe and of Grimm. Paris. 1804 and 1830. The " (Euvres " of Condorcet. Paris. 1847-9. The " Memoires " of the Abbe de Morellet. The " (Euvres " of Mme. de Stael. The "Tombeau de Mile, de Lespinasse," edited by the Bibliophile Jacob (M. Paul Lacroix). 1879. Julie- Jeanne-file onore de Lespinasse was born at Lyon on the 18th of November, 1732. It was not without good reason that she compared her birth and her early years to the most affecting pages of the novels of Richardson or the Abbd 22 - NOTES. Provost. She owed her life to a guilty connection formed by the Coratesse d'Albon ; and it was only by concealing, at least from strangers, the secret of this origin that her mother was able to keep her with her and to treat her, if not publicly, at any rate in reality, as her daughter, and perhaps as her best-loved child. About this mystery which surrounded the life and youth of Mile, de Lespinasse, her contemporaries gathered only uncertain and often contradictory rumours. Grimm, and even La Harpe and Marmontel, who knew her intimately, do not agree in their narratives. At the period when they wrote nothing was clearly known of those early years ; to-day it is otherwise, and the testimony of Mme. du Deffand, a connec- tion of the d'Albon family, and that of M. de Guibert, who not only received the confidences of Mile, de Lespinasse, but to whom she read the narrative she had herself written on this period of her life, enable us to rectify all errors. Mile, de Lespinasse was brought up by her mother, from whom she received a solid and even brilliant education, as to which all her contemporaries are agreed. The tenderness of the mother went so far as to think of having her recog- nized as a legitimate daughter. Mme. du Deffand, relating, in a letter to the Duchesse de Luynes, her first meeting with the young girl at the chateau de Chamrond, belonging to her (Mme. du Deffand's) brother, the Marquis de Vichy-Cham- rond, who had married the legitimate and eldest daughter of Mme. d'Albon, speaks of her as " a person who has no relatives who acknowledge her, or at any rate none who will, or ought to acknowledge her. This," she adds, " will show you her posi- tion. I foimd her at Chamrond, where she has lived since the death of Mme. d'Albon (the mother of my sister-in-law), who had brought her u}) and, in spite of her youth, had given her marks of the greatest friendship." Elsewhere she says NOTES. 23 that the girl had passed her early years with the son of Mme. d'Albon, the Vicomte d'Albon. We may suppose that those years were spent in the ancient manor of Avranches, situated on the road from Eoanne to Lyon, a patrimonial domain of the d'Albons which her mother, the last representative of that branch of the family, inherited from her father, the Marquis de Saint-Forgeux, in 1729. The painful and almost tragic scenes which, it is only too true, darkened the young girl's youth, took place undoubtedly during the first months after her mother's death and, more especially, during the five years from 1747 to 1752, which she passed at Chamrond wdth the Marquise de Vichy, legiti- mate daughter of the Comtesse d'Albon. The youngs girl had accepted the proposal to live there, believing that she would be treated as a friend. She was almost immediately made governess to the children, three in number, the eldest being scarcely eight years old. But the bitterness of her position came much less from the humble duties she was required to perform than from the manner in which she was treated. When Mme. du Deffand went to pass the summer of 1752 at Chamrond with her brother and sister-in-law, she noticed the intelligence and the charm of Mile, de Les- pinasse, and was also struck by the air of sadness which dimmed her face. Soon she obtained her confidence. " She told me," says Mme. du Deffand, " that it was no longer pos- sible for her to remain with M. and Mme. de Vichy; that she had long borne the harshest and most humiliating treat- ment ; that her patience was now at an end, and for more than a year she had declared to Mme. de Vichy that she must go away, being unable to bear any longer the scenes that were made to her daily." Nevertheless, the conduct of Mile, de Lespinasse on the death of her mother had been such as ought to have won her 24 NOTES. not only the esteem and respect, but the affection of those who, by blood if not by law, were her brother and sister. 'Put in possession of a large sum of money by her dying mother, who intended to have secured to her a rich future, she had generously and spontaneously given it to the Vicomte d'Albon, thus reducing herself to the modest income of a hvmdred crowns left to her by the will of her mother. Mile, de Lespinasse had resolved to fling herself into a convent rather than remain longer with the Vichys, when Mme. du Deffand, now nearly blind and seeking a com- panion, proposed to the young girl to live with lier in Paris, in that convent of Saint-Joseph which, with nothing cloistral about it, served (like the Abbaye-aux-Bois in our own day) as a decent but very worldly retreat for a small number of women of rank, in which each had her separate and inde- pendent suite of rooms. It was in October, 1752, that Mme. du Deffand made this proposal to Mile, de Lespinasse, but it was not until sixteen months later, in April, 1754, that the latter was able to accept an offer she had welcomed eagerly. She spent those months in a convent at Lyon, under the friendly eye and protection of Cardinal de Tencin. The delay was caused by futile efforts to obtain the con- sent of the Vicomte dAlbon and Mme. de Vichy to the new arrangement. Filled with incurable distrust, the brother and sister refused to sanction a project which they regarded as a menace to their prosperity ; although Mme. du Deffand had taken upon herself the care of avoiding that danger by exacting from Mile, de Lespinasse a pledge never to use her new position to establish lier rights to the name and to a share in the fortime of the d'Albon family. The following extracts from the letters of Mme. du Deffand throw light on this period : — NOTES. 25 Frovi Mme. la Marquise du Deffand to Mile, de Lespinasse. Paris, February 13, 1754. I am very glad, my queen, that you are satisfied with my letters and also with the course which you have taken towards M. d'Albon. I am convinced that he will resolve on securing you a pension; he would be stoned by every one if he did otherwise. In case he re- fuses, you obtain entire freedom to follow your own will, which I trust will bring you to live with me. But examine yourself well, my queen, and be very sure that you will not repent. In your last letter you wrote me very tender and flattering things ; but remember that you did not think the same only two or three months ago ; you then confessed to me that you were frightened at the dull life I made you foresee, — a life which, although you are accustomed to it, would be more intolerable in the midst of the great world than it has been in your seclusion ; you feared, you said, to fall into a state of discouragement, which would render you intolerable, and inspire me with disgust and repentance. Those were your expressions; you thought them a fault which required my pardon, and you begged me to forget them ; but, my queen, it is not a fault to speak our thoughts, and explain our dispositions ; on the contrary, we can do nothing better. ... I shall treat you not only with politeness, but even with compliments before the world, to accustom it to the consideration it ought to have for you. ... I shall not have the air of seeking to introduce you ; I expect to make you desired ; and if you know me well, you need have no anxiety as to the manner in which I shall treat your self-love. But you must rely on the knowledge that I have of the world. . . , There is a second point on which I must explain myself to you ; it is that the slightest artifice, or even the most trifling little art, if you were to put it into your conduct, would be intolerable to me. I am naturally distrustful, and all those in whom I detect slyness become suspicious to me to the point of no longer feeling the slightest confidence in them. I have two intimate friends, Formont and d'Alembert; I love them passionately, but less for their agreeable charms and their friendship for me than for their absolute truthfulness. Therefore, you must, my queen, resolve to live with me with the utmost truth and sincerity, and never 26 NOTES. use insinuation, nor any exaggeration ; in a word, n^vax deviate^ and never lose one of the greatest charms of youth, which is candour. You have much intelligence, you have gaiety, you are capable of feelings ; with all these qualities you will be charming so long as you let yourself go to your natural impulse, and are without pretension and without subterfuge. . . . March 29, 1754. . , . Another favour I have to ask of you (and it is the most important of all), namely: not to come to me unless you have totally forgotten who you are, and unless you have made a firm resolution never to think of changing your civil state. It would be perfidy to make use of my friendship to cover me with shame, to expose me to the blame of all honourable persons, to make my family my relentless enemies. The slightest attempt of this kind that you might make while living with me would be an unpardon- able crime. I hope, my queen, that you liave no need to consult yourself again on this point. It is long since you promised me all I could desire on this subject. I am perfectly certain that any such attempt would be in vain ; but it would, none the less, be dreadful for me if you made one, and I repeat that I should never forgive it. . . . April 8, 1754. ... I hope, my queen, that I shall have no reason to repent what I do for you ; and that you will not come to me unless you are fully decided to make no attempt [to change your social state]. You know but too well how useless such efforts are ; but in future, when living with me, they would be fatal to you, for the grief they would cause me would draw down upon you powerful enemies, and you would find yourself in a state of abandonment in which there would be no resource. That said, there remains only to tell you of the joy I shall have in seeing you and in living with you. I shall write at once to M. le Cardinal to beg him to start you from Lyon as soon as possible. . . . Adieu, my queen; pack yoiir trunks and come to be the happi- ness and consolation of my life ; it does not depend on me to make it reciprocal. NOTES. 27 Mile, de Lespinasse was twenty-two years of age when she came to take the situation thus foreshadowed. Mme. du Deffand was fifty-seven, and already nearly blind. Long since celebrated for her wit, she was beginning to be so for her salon, where, side by side with men of letters, were found all that aristocracy could then present that was most distinguished for taste and intellect. Mile. de. Lespinasse, on her first entrance to a world so new to her, was not out of place. Her tact, her intelligence won all suffrages ; we find the proof of it in the praises bestowed upon her by such good judges as the Chevalier d'Aydie, the Prince de Beauvau, and President H^nault. The qualities she may have lacked she soon acquired by contact with the most polished society that ever existed. " See what an education I received ! " she says herself. " Mme. du Deffand, President Hdnault, the Abb^ Bon, the Archbishop of Toulouse, the Archbishop of Aix, M. Turgot, M. d'Alembert, the Abbe de Boismont, — these are the persons who taught me to speak and to think, and who have deigned to consider me as something." This life in common lasted ten years, from 1754 to 1764. Begun imder such auspices, for what reason did it become a burden to the one who proposed it and to the other who accepted it ? How came it to end in an open rupture which had all the importance of an event, and actually divided, almost into two camps, the society of that day ? Evidently there were faults on both sides : Mme. du Deffand abusing the superiority which her rank and her role as protectress gave her over Mile, de Lespinasse ; and the latter allowing, little by little, indifference and coldness to take the place of her early interest and zeal. But the true determining cause of the rupture was the rivalry, the jealousy perhaps, which grew up between the two women. We recall Mme. du Def- f and's words in the foregoing letter : " There is a point on 28 NOTES. which I must explain myself to you. The slightest artifice, even the most trifling little art, in your conduct would be intolerable to me." That art, that artifice, Mile, de Lespinasse was guilty of in the eyes of her protectress — let us use the true word, mis- tress — on the day when she received in her own little room, privately and, as it were, secretly, the most illustrious friends of the marquise, Turgot, Marmontel, d'Alembert, — d'Alem- bert of all others ! the favourite of Mme. du Deffand ! When the latter, who slept till evening wearied with her late hours, discovered this fact her anger broke forth into violent re- proaches. " It was nothing less to her mind," says Marmon- tel, " than treachery ; she uttered loud outcries, accusing the poor girl of stealing her friends, and declaring she would no longer warm that serpent in her bosom." This abrupt separation left Mile, de Lespinasse without resources, reduced to the paltry income of a hundred crowns which her mother had left her in her will. But she had friends, and they did not fail her. Not only did d'Alembert (whom Mme. du Deffand compelled to choose between her- self and Mile, de Lespinasse) not hesitate to boldly take the part of the latter, not only did all those who might be called her intimates — Turgot, Chastellux, Marmontel, the Comte d'Anldzy, the Duchesse de Chatillon — stand by her, without at the same time breaking wholly with her rival, but the special friends of Mme. du Deffand, those who remained witli her to the last, did not refrain from giving to Mile, de Lespinasse the most touching and practical marks of inter- est. It was felt, moreover, that she was already a power, and society desired not to quarrel with a rising sovereign, " All the friends of Mme. du Deffand," says Marmontel, " became hers. It was easy to convince them that the anger of the former was unjust. President H^nault himself de- NOTES. 29 clared for her. The Buchesse de Luxembourg blamed her old friend openly, and made a present to Mile, de Lespinasse of the complete furniture of the apartment she had hired ; and the Due de Choiseul obtained for her from the king an annual sum which put her above actual need." In quitting Mme. du Deffand, Mile, de Lespinasse did not exile herself from the faubourg Saint-Germain; she established her new home not far from the convent of Saint- Joseph, in the street, and close to the convent, of Belle- Chasse. Installed in this apartment, which, though modest, must have been almost vast to receive the visitors who pressed there in greater numbers daily, she was not long alone ; a year later d'Alembert joined her, thus associating his life definitely with that of a woman whom he had loved for eight years, and by whom he thought himself beloved. " They lived very far apart," says Marmontel ; " and though in bad weather it was difficult for d'Alembert to return at night from the rue de Belle-Chasse to the rue Michel-le- Comte, where his foster-mother lived, he never thought of quitting the latter until he fell ill of putrid fever, for which the first remedy is pure and free air. His physician, Bou- vard, became imeasy and declared to us that his present lodging might be fatal to him. Watelet offered him his house near the boulevard du Temple ; there he was taken, and Mile, de Lespinasse, in spite of all that might be said or thought, went to nurse him. No one, however, thought or said anything but good of her action, D'Alembert recovered, and then, consecrating his life to her who had taken care of him, he went to live in the same house. Nothing more inno- cent than their intimacy, therefore it was respected ; malig- nity itself never attacked it; and the consideration which Mile, de Lespinasse enjoyed, far from suffering any shock, was only the more honourably and publicly established." 30 NOTES. We must not exaggerate the character of this union, which was restricted solely, on the jjart of d'Alembert, to " lodging in the same house," in which there were ten other families, Mile, de Lespinasse always maintaining her separate suite of rooms. The question here arises as to the nature of d'Alembert's feelings for his friend. " Oh ! you," he cries after her death, " whom I have so tenderly and constantly loved, and by whom I believed that I was loved." Elsewhere he speaks of liis " heart which has never ceased to be hers." And yet in spite of these protestations of love, he rejects, in a letter to Voltaire, the very idea of his marriage : " The person to whom they marry me, in the gazettes, is in truth a most estimable person in character, and formed by the charm and sweetness of her society to make a husband happy. But she is worthy of a better establishment than mine, and there is between us neither marriage nor love, only reciprocal esteem and all the gentleness of friendship." Member of the Academy of Sciences, and also of the French Academy, the perpetual secretary of which he soon became, and the recognized chief of the Encyclopedists, d'Alembert was not so bad a match as he chooses to say. The truth is that the love of poor dAlembert for his friend was never without a rival ; first, the Marquis de Mora, whose memory rent her soul with regret and remorse, and last, the Comte de Guibert, who, by the passion he inspired, brought her life to its close in weakness and misery. When Mile, de Lespinasse, ceasing to be a dependent in the shadow of Mme. du Deffand, opened her rival salon in the rue de Belle-Chasse, she was thirty-two years old, with little or no beauty, but a face of astonishing mobility, on which could be read the emotions of her soul, with, above all, a suddenness of impressions, a vivacity and charm of NOTES. 31 mind which created around her a sort of atmosphere of enthusiasm and sympathy. Such are the chief features of the portrait which her contemporaries have left of her. La Harpe speaks of her as a person " well-made, with an agreeable face before the small-pox spoilt it." " She was tall and well-formed," says M. de Guibert. " I did not know her until she was thirty -eight years of age, but her figure was still noble and full of grace. But what she possessed, and what distinguished her above all else, was that first and greatest charm of all, without which beauty is but a cold perfection, the charm of an expressive countenance ; hers had no special character; it united all." But, as often liap- pens to persons for whom the trials of life begin early, one thing was lacking to Mile, de Lespinasse, namely, the look of youth, in which happiness plays so great a part. " Her face," says Grimm, " was never young." But her soul was — ever. To Marmontel it seemed " an ardent soul, a fiery nature, a romantic imagination." " She was born," says Grimm, " with nerves that were marvellously sensitive. But that sensibility, which gave passion such grasp upon her, made her also accessible to all generous emotions — enthusiasm for the noble and the good, indigna- tion at the bad and the mean." " She was of all styles," says Guibert ; " the lover of what was good ! How she enjoyed, 'how she knew how to praise that which pleased her, above all, that which touched her ! " These qualities had their reverse, namely : infatuation and variability. D'Alembert reproaches her for too ready a credulity, especially when sentiments of a specially tender nature were in question. She herself speaks of that " mobility of soul of which they accuse me," and admits it. Such was her soul. As for her mind : all was natural, spontaneous, of an elegant simplicity as far removed from 32 NOTES. commonplaceness as from studied elegance ; the most perfect harmony existed between thought and expression ; she had a solid education, leaving more to divine than was shown ; a smiling good sense rather than a downright, open gaiety ; and finally, a tact so perfect that she seemed to have the secret of all natures and all susceptibilities. These were her salient traits, her most seductive endowments. D'Alem- bert dwells particularly on this exquisite tact : " What dis- tinguishes you above all," he says to her, " is the art of say- ing to each that which suits him; this art, though little common, is very simple in you ; it consists in never speaking of yourself to others, but much of them." " I have never known," says La Harpe, " a woman who had more natural wit, less desire to show it, and more talent in showing to advantage that of others." And Marmontel adds his word : " One of her charms was the ardent nature that impas- sioned her language and communicated to her opinions the warmth, the sympathy, the eloquence of feeling. Often, too, with her, reason grew playful ; a gentle philosophy allowed itself light jesting." We can easily comprehend the influence that such qualities of heart and mind must have had on the society of that period. And if we add to this personal influence of Mile. de Lespinasse that (which was very great) of d'Alembert, the recognized leader of the philosophic party, who added to his fame as a learned man a literary renown which made the French Academy choose him as its perpetual secretary, we shall form a correct idea of what the salon of Mile, de Lespi- nasse was — more literary than that of the Marquise du Deffand, more aristocratic than that of the bourgeoise Mme. Geoffrin. The dinners and suppers, which held so great a place in the fame of the Maecenases of that day, counted for nothing in the celebrity of the salon in the rue de Belle- NOTES. 33 Chasse. There, people talked from five o'clock to ten o'clock daily. We may say that for twelve years, from 1764 to 1776, there was not a day when the choicest society failed to be there, and not a day when Mile, de Lespinasse failed to receive it. Not for all the world would her friends have missed these daily festivals of intellect, gi-ace, and elegance. Other salons had their habitual guests, their reigning and dominating friends : with Mme. du Deffand were President Henault, Pont de Veyle, the Prince de Beauvau, the Choiseuls, and Horace Walpole, on his too rare journeys to Paris ; with Mme. Geoffrin, Marmontel and Antoine Thomas ; with the Baron d'Holbach, Diderot and Grimm ; but with IMlle. de Lespinasse it was not even d'Alembert who reigned. In her salon alone were received on a footing of perfect equality, without marked preference, all that Paris had of most illus- trious in letters, sciences, and arts. D'Alembert was no more than an ordinary visitor, iinus inter pares. But his talent as a talker made the place more delightful. " His conversation," says Grimm, " offered all that could instruct and divert the mind. He lent himself with as much facility as good-will to whatever subject would please most generally ; bringing to it an almost inexliaustible fund of ideas, anecdotes, and curious recollections. There was, I may say, no topic, however dry or frivolous in itself, that he had not the secret of making interesting. He spoke well, related with much precision, and brought out his point with a rapidity which was peculiar to him. All his humorous sayings have a delicate and profound originality." Variety — such was the special character of the salon of Mile, de Lespinasse; and this is particularly shown in the account that Grimm has left of it. " Without fortune, without birth, without beauty, she had succeeded in collecting around her a very numerous, very 3 34 NOTES. varied, and veiy assiduous society. Her circle met daily from five o'clock until nine in the evening. There we were sure to find choice men of all orders in the State, the Church, the Court, — military men, foreigners, and the most dis- tinguished men of letters. Every one agrees that though the name of M. d'Alembert may have drawn them thither, it was she alone who kept them there. Devoted wholly to the care of preserving that society, of which she was the soul and the charm, she subordinated to this purpose all her tastes and all her personal intimacies. She seldom went to the theatre or into the coimtry, and when she did make an exception to this rule it was an event of which all Paris was notified in advance. . . . Politics, religion, philosophy, anec- dotes, news, nothing was excluded from the conversation, and, thanks to her care, tlie most trivial little narrative gained, as naturally as possible, the place and notice it de- served. News of all kinds was gathered there in its first freshness." No one has better pictured than Marmontel the influence of Mile, de Lespinasse on her society, or made us feel more fully the sort of creative breath which, from this chaos, brought forth a world so brilliant and harmonious. " I do not put," he says, " among the number of my private societies the assembly which gathered every evening in the apartments of Mile, de Lespinasse, for with the exception of a few friends of d'Alembert, such as the Chevalier de Chas- tellux, the Abbe Morellet, Saint-Lambert, and myself, the circle was formed of persons who were not bound together. She had taken them liere and there in society, but so well assorted were they that once there they fell into harmony like the strings of an instrument touched by an able hand. Following out that comparison, I may say that she played the instrument with an art that came of genius ; she seemed NOTES. 35 to know what tone each string would yield before she touched it ; I mean to say that our minds and our natures were so well known to her that in order to bring them into play she had but to say a word. Nowhere was conversation more lively, more brilliant, or better regidated than at her house. It was a rare phenomenon indeed, the degi-ee of tempered, equable heat which she knew so well how to maintain, sometimes by moderating it, sometimes by quickening it. The continual activity of her soul was communicated to our souls, but measurably ; her imagination was the mainspring, her reason the regulator. Remark that the brains she stirred at will were neither feeble nor frivolous : the Condillacs and Turgots were among them; d'Alembert was like a simple, docile child beside her. Her talent for casting out a thought and giving it for discussion to men of that class, her own talent in discussing it with precision, sometimes with elo- quence, her talent for bringing forward new ideas and vary- ing the topic — always with the facility and ease of a fairy, who, with one touch of her wand, can change the scene of her enchantment — these talents, I say, were not those of an ordinary woman. It was not with the follies of fashion and vanity that daily, during four hours of conversation, without languor and without vacuum, she knew how to make herself interesting to a wide circle of strong minds." Grimm insists on very nearly the same traits. " She pos- sessed," he says, " in an eminent degree that art so diffi- cult and SQ precious, — of making the best of the minds of others, of interesting them, and of bringing them iato play without any appearance of constraint or effort. She knew how to unite the different styles of mind, sometimes even the most opposed, without appearing to take the slightest pains to do so; by a word, adroitly flung in, she sustained the conversation, animating and varying it as she pleased. 36 NOTES. No one knew better how to do the honours of her house; she put every one in his place, and every one was content with it. She had great knowledge of the world, and that species of politeness which is most agreeable ; I mean that which has the tone of personal interest." There were times, however, when the sensitive taste of Mile, de Lespinasse was shocked and overcome by occasional vulgarity of manners or expression. Of this the Abbe Mo- rellet has left an amusing record in his " Memoirs." " Mile, de Lespinasse," he relates, " loving men of intellect passionately and neglecting no means of knowing them and attracting them to her circle, ardently desired to know M. de Buffon. Mme. Geoffrin, agreeing to procure her that happi- ness, invited Buffon to pass an evening at her house. Behold Mile, de Lespinasse in the seventh heaven, promising herself to observe closely that celebrated man, and not lose a single word that issued from his lips. The conversation having be- gun, on the part of Mile, de Lespinasse by flattering compli- ments, such as she knew so well how to pay, the topic of the art of writing was brought up, and some one remarked, with eulogy, how well M. de Buffon had united clearness with loftiness of style, a union very difficult and rarely produced. ' Oh, the devil ! ' said M. de Buffon, his head high, his eyes partly closed, and with an air half silly, half inspired : ' oh, the devil ! when it comes to clarifying one's style, that 's another pair of sleeves.' At this speech, this vulgar comparison. Mile, de Lespinasse was visibly troubled; her countenance changed, she threw herself back in her chair, muttering between her teeth, 'Another pair of sleeves! clarify his style ! ' and she did not recover herself the whole evening." But conversation alone was not all that went on in the salon of the rue de Belle-Chasse ; academicians were made NOTES. 37 there. Chastellux owed his election in a great measure to Mile, de Lespinasse. In her last hours, already lying on her deathbed, she secured that of La Harpc " M. de La Harpe" says Bachaumont in his Memoirs, "was one of her nurs- lings ; by her influence she opened the doors of the Academy to him who is now its secretary. This poet was the last of those whom she enabled to enter them." All power has its detractors, all royalty its envious carpers, and these cast great blame on Mile, de Lespinasse for caballing, so they said, in the interests of her friends and through the influ- ence of d'Alembert, to close the doors of the Academy to those who were not her friends. Dorat, whose style she did not like (and perhaps not his person), attributed to her the various checks his academic ambition had met with ; and he made himself the organ of these accusations in two come- dies entitled, " Les Proneurs " and " Merlin Bel Esprit." Society came very near seeing renewed the scandal of the famous comedy of " Les Philosophes," and Mile, de Les- pinasse only just escaped being acted on the stage during her lifetime by Dorat, as Eousseau had been by Palissot. With- out justifying Dorat, ^vhose comic muse was otherwise very inoffensive, it cannot be denied that Mile, de Lespinasse played a very great part in all tlie Academic struggles, and that her devotion to the ideas of d'Alembert and the Ency- clopedists, often carried her too far. Grimm, who men- tions the reproach, contests its justice without denying its cause. "Her enemies," he says," blamed her, very ridiculously, for being concerned in a variety of affairs which were not her business, and for having favoured by her intrigues that philo- sophic despotism which the cabal of the bigots accused M. d'Alembert of exercising over the Academy. But why should women, who decide everything in France, not decide 38 NOTES. also the honours of literature ? . . . M. Dorat, who thinks he has reason to complain of her, has allowed himself to take vengeance in a play called 'Les Proneurs.' Several persons who have heard it read think it has more invention and more gaiety than M. Dorat has put into his other come- dies. The play turns on a young man whom they want to initiate into the mysteries of the modem philosophy, and to whom, in consequence, they teach the methods of acquirmg celebrity in the quickest manner. M. d'Alembert and Mile, de Lespinasse play the chief roles. The story is told that one of their most zealous admirers, an old courtier who is very hard of hearing, when the plot of the new play was read before him, seeing every one about him ecstatic, cried out, louder than any of them, ' There now ! that is good comedy.' " We now know the friends who occupied the mind of Mile, de Lespinasse ; we have next to speak of those who filled her heart. . . . But here we must turn to the sketch of M. de Mora and M. de Guibert, and to the picture of the love, the passion, the remorse that consumed her life contained in Sainte- Beuve's essay which precedes these Notes. All further analysis would be superfluous, for what can be needed after the sympathetic but judicial insight of that true discerner of men and women ? Nevertheless, for a clear understanding of the following letters, whicli are full of allusions that need a clue, it is well to refer once more to the particular fact that underlies them, namely : the struggle in her soul between her love for M. de Mora and her passion for M. de Guibert. All the letters up to the time of M. de Mora's death have this struggle for their key-note, — a struggle naturally full of inconsistencies. After his death her remorse begins, and, embittered by M. de NOTES. 39 Guibert's unfaithfulness — which her passion condones — it kills her. Mile, de Lespinasse possessed the mysterious gift of charm, a gift that cannot be explained or analyzed, a spiritual gift, not dependent on beauty or physical attraction, and one which many women exercise equally over men and women. The word " exercise," however, is not applicable to it, for it is an unconscious faculty, a gift bestowed on women which they themselves are unable to explain ; some of its elements are easily defined, — such as self-unconsciousness, perception of the souls of others, — but as a whole the gift is mysterious. Mile, de Lespinasse had it in an eminent degi'ee imtil the period of her fatal passion. Plainly it was a part of the tie between herself and M. de Mora, and she never lost it with her circle of friends so long as she lived, nor after her death. The story of d'Alembert's attachment to her is as full of pain as her own, and even more pathetic. His was the passion of friendship, if not of love ; and it is difticidt to acquit her of indifference to his feelings, and even of cruelty, especially in the bequest of her correspondence with M. de Mora, to be read and destroyed by him at her death. Even Marmontel, so faithful to her himself, says : " Mile, de Lespinasse was no longer the same with d'Alembert ; not only did he have to bear her coldness, but often her fretful humours full of gloom and bitterness." She admits this herself, and gives as its excuse (which Sainte-Beuve recognizes) that her soul was wrung with remorse for the deception she was practising upon him. A true excuse no doubt, and one with which we ought to credit her ; but the sorrow and the distress to him were none the less, and the shock when he discovered the truth after her death was not the more bearable. No, his passion stands beside hers in this sad story, and we cannot help comparing them. Hers has the stilrm rtnd dranfj of 40 NOTES. passionate emotion, with fame to crown it: his was silent sorrow, and he died of it, unsung. Marmontel leaves us no doubt that her death was the cause of his. " D'Alembert," he says, " was unconsoled and incon- solable for his loss. It was then that he buried himself in the lodging given to him in the Louvre as secretary of the J-rench Academy. I have told elsewhere how he passed the rest of his life. He often complained to me of the dreadful solitude into which he had fallen. In vain I reminded him of all that he had told me himself about the change in the feelings of his friend. " Yes," he replied, " she was changed, but I was not ; she lived no longer for me, but I lived always for her. Now that she is gone, I know not why I live. Ah ! would that I had still to suffer the bitter moments she knew so well how to soften and make me forget ! Do you remem- ber the happy evenings we spent with her ? And now — what remains to me ? Instead of herself when I come home, I find her shade. This lodging in the Louvre is like a tomb ; I never enter it except with horror." D'Alembert survived his friend, whose memory never left him for an instant, seven years. It was on a Thursday, May 23, 1776, that death brought to Mile, de Lespinasse the rest for which she longed. The account that La Harpe has left of this event is perhaps the most affecting that we have of it : " During the last days of her life she saw none but her intimate friends. They were all in her chamber on the night of her death ; and all were weeping. She had passed tlie last three days in a state of exliaustion that scarcely permitted her to speak aloud. The nurses revived her with cordials and raised her in her bed. * Do I still live ? ' she said. Those were her last words." The Letters of Mile, de Lespinasse cannot be read and judged by personal standards or social convention ; not even NOTES. 41 from the standpoint of our present phase of human nature, which a century has changed from hers. There are many judgments and countless criticisms that might be made upon her ; but the essential thing is that here is a human soul laid bare in the fierce light of the fire of passion, and fit to stand by the great ones of her class, Sappho, H^loise, and the un- known souls whose genius never passed to words ; for this passion of loving is a form of genius. LETTERS OF MLLE. DE LESPINASSE TO M. DE GUIBERT, Paris, Saturday evening, May 15, 1773. You start on Tuesday ; and as I know not the effect which your departure will have upon me, as I know not if I shall have freedom or will to write, I wish to speak with you once more and assure myself of receiving news of you from Strasburg. You must tell me if you arrive there in good health ; if the movement of travelling has not already calmed your soul. Not that your soul is " ill, it suffers only from the ills it causes ; and diversion, change of scene will suffice to turn aside those emotions of sympathy which may be painful to you because you are kind and honourable. Yes, you are yerj kind ; I have just re-read your letter of this morning ; it has the sweetness of Gestner joined to the energy of Jean-Jacques. Eh, mon Dieu ! why unite all that can touch and please, and why, above all, offer me a blessing of which I am not worthy, which I have not deserved ? No, no ! I do not want your friendship ; it would console me, it would agitate me, and I need rest ; I need to forget you for a time. I wish to be sincere with you and with myself ; and, in truth, in the trouble in which I am I fear to be mistaken ; perhaps my remorse is greater than my wrong- 44 LETTERS OF [1773 doing ; perhaps the alarm I have felt is that which would most offend the one I love. I have just received, this instant, a letter so full of confidence in my feelings ; he speaks to me of myself, of what I think, of my soul, with that degree of knowledge and certainty which is uttered only when we feel strongly and keenly. Ah, mon Dieu ! by what charm, by what fatality have you come to distract me ? Why did I not die in the month of September ? I could have died then without regret, without the reproaches that I now make to myself. Alas ! I feel it, I could still die for him ; there is no interest of mine I would not sacrifice to him — but for two months past I have had none to make ; I do not love more, but I love better. Oh ! he will pardon me ! I had suffered so much ! my body, my soul were so exhausted by the long continuance of the sorrow. The news I received of him threw me sometimes into frenzy. It was then that I first saw you ; then that you revived my soul, then that you brought pleasure into it ; I know not which was sweetest, to feel it, or to owe it to you. But tell me, is this the tone of friendship, the tone of con- fidence ? What is it that is drawing me ? Make me know myself ; aid me to recover myself in a measure ; my soul is convulsed ; is it you, is it your departure, what is it that per- secutes me ? I can no more. At this moment I have confidence in you, even to abandonment, but perhaps I shall never speak to you again of my life. Adieu, I shall see you to-morrow ; possibly I shall feel embarrassed by what I have now written to you. Would to heaven that you were my friend, or that I had never known you ! Do you believe me ? Will you be my friend ? Think of it, once only ; is that too much ? 1773] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 45 Sunday, May 23, J773. If I were young, pretty, and very charming, I should not fail to see much art in your conduct to me ; but as I am nothing of all that, I find a kindness and an honour in it which have won you rights over my soul forever. You have tilled it with gratitude, with esteem, with sensibility, and all other feelings which give intimacy and confidence to intercourse. I cannot speak as well as Montaigne upon friendship, but, believe me, we shall feel it better. And yet, if what Mon- taigne says had been in his heart, would he have consented to live after the loss of such a friend ? But this is not the question here ; it is of you, of the grace, the delicacy, the timeliness of your quotation. You come to my rescue ; you will not let me blame myself ; you will not suffer your memorj- to be a sad reproach to my heart, and, perhaps, an offence to my self-respect ; in a word, you wish me to enjoy in peace the friendship that you offer me and prove to me with as much gentleness as gi-ace. Yes, I accept it ; I make it my blessing ; it will console me ; and if I ever again enjoy your society it will be the pleasure I shall feel and desire the most. I hope you have pardoned me the wrong I did not do. You surely feel that it is not possible for me to suspect you of an impulse against kindness and honour. Yet I accused you of it ; that meant nothing, except that I was weak and cul- pable, and, above all, troubled to the point of losing my presence and freedom of mind. You see things too well and too quickly to let me fear you could mistake me ; I am well assured that your soul sees no reason to complain of the emotions of mine. I know that you did not start till Thursday at half-past five o'clock. I was at your door, two minutes after your departure. I had sent in the morning to inquire at what hour you left on 46 LETTERS OF [1773 Wednesday ; and, to my great astonishment, I learned that you were still in Paris, and it was not known if you would start on Thursday even. I went myself to learn if you were ill ; and (what may strike you as shocking) it seemed to me that I desired it. Nevertheless, with an inconsistency which I will not explain I felt comforted on learning that you were gone. Yes, your departure has restored my calmness ; but I feel more sad. You must pardon this, and be satisfied. I do not know if I regret you, but 1 miss you as my pleasure ; I believe that active and sensitive souls cling too strongly to pleasure. It is not the idea of the length of your absence that distresses me — my thought does not go so far ; it is simply the present that weighs upon my soul, depresses, saddens it, and scarcely leaves it energy to desire better sentiments. But see, what honible selfishnes ! here are three pages full of myself , and yet 1 l)elieve it is of you that I am think- ing ; at least I feel I must know how you are, whether you are well. When you read this, how far away you will be ! Your person may be only three hundred leagues distant, but see what strides your thought has already made ! what new objects ! what ideas ! what novel reflections ! It seems to me that I am speaking now to the mere shadow of you ; all that I know of you has disappeared ; scarcely will you find in your memory any traces of the affections which agitated and excited you during the last days you spent in Paris; and it is best so. You know how we agreed that too great sensibility was a mark of mediocrity, and your character commands you to be great ; your talents condemn you to celebrity. Yield yourself, therefore, to your destiny, and tell yourself, firmly, that you are not made for the soft, inward life that tender- ness and sentiment require. There is only pleasure and no glory in living for a single object. When we reign in one heart 1778] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 47 only we cannot reign in public opinion. There are names made for history ; yours will one day rouse its admiration. When I fill myself with that thought the interest with which you inspire me is a little moderated. Adieu. Monday, May 24, 1773. What say you to this folly ? Scarcely can I flatter myself that you will read me when I overwhelm you with letters ! But you said the other day that we should write at length to friends, to those who please us, to those we would like to talk with. If you spoke truly, you are obliged not only to read me with interest, but with indulgence. I have just re-read my long letter ; mon Dieu, how tiresome I foimd it ! but if I write it over again it will be no better. I feel myself predestined to be tiresome in more ways than one. I am sad and dull ; what can one do with that ? But I have questions to put to you ; answer them, and you will be very amiable. Have you received a letter from Diderot ? He expects to leave the 6th of June ; thus you will see him in Eussia. Why did you not start on Wednesday ? Was it to yourself or to some one else that you gave those twenty-four hours ? Have you carried away with you that book of M. Thomas ? I hope so ; it has almost the tone of your soul ; it is noble, strong, and virtuous. There are, no doubt, a few de- fects ; he has corrected what was turgid and exaggerated in his style ; but there is too much analysis and enumeration, which fatigue a little — especially when it costs us much to separate from an object which fills our thoughts. I have been obliged to stop reading it for several days. ^ It is the post- man who decides, twice a week, all the actions of my life ; yesterday he made reading impossible to me. I sought only ^ " Essay on the Cliaracter, Manners, Morals, and Mind of Women in the different Ages," by Antoine-Leonard Thomas, of the French Academy. Paris, 1772. 48 LETTERS OF [1773 the letter I did not receive ; why look for it in M. Th(jinas ? I could not find it there ! Did you not promise me news from Strasburg ? Are you surprised now that you pledged yourself to write to me so often ? Have you regretted the facility with whicli you yielded to the interest and eager- ness shown to you ? It is troublesome at a distance of three hundred leagues to have to act for others ; there is no pleasure except in following one's own impulse and senti- ment. See how generous I am ! I offer to return your promise if you now find you have made a mistake. Acknowl- edge it to me, and I assure you I will not be wounded. Be- lieve me, it is only vanity that makes people touchy, and I have none ; I am merely a good creature, very stupid, very simple, who loves the happiness and pleasure of those I love better than what is mine or for me. Having that knowledge, be at your ease ; write to me " un pen, beaucoup, pas du tout" — but do not fancy that I shall be equally satisfied: for I have even less indifference than vanity. But I have a strength, or a faculty, which renders me able for all : it is that of knowing how to suffer, and to suffer much without complaint. Adieu ; have you reached this point in my letter ? and is it not wearisome ? Sunday, May 30, 1773. I received, yesterday, your Strasburg letter; the time seemed very long since Wednesday, 19th, the day on which I received your last sign of remembrance ; that which came to me yesterday consoled me and did good to my soul, which needs to be diverted by the entrance of a gentle sentiment to which it can yield without trouble and without remorse. Yes, I can now avow it to myself, I can say it to you — I care for you tenderly ; your absence gives me keen regrets ; but no longer have I to struggle against the feelings you in- 1773] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 49 spire in me ; I have seen clearly into my soul. Ah ! the ex- cess of my sorrow justifies me, I am not guilty, and yet, before long, I shall be a victim. I thought to die Friday on receiving a letter by special courier ; the trouble into which it threw me took from me even the power to unseal it ; I was more than a quarter of an hour without moving ; my soul had numbed my senses. At last I read it, and I found but a part of what I feared: I need not tremble for the life of him I love. But sheltered from the greatest of all misfortunes, oh, my God ! how much remains for me to suffer ! how crushed I feel beneath the weight of life ! the duration of ills is more than human strength can bear ; I feel but one courage, often but one need. Ought I not therefore to love you, ought I not to cherish your presence ? You have had the power to divert my mind from an anguish as sharp as it was deep ; I await, I desire your letters. Yes, believe me, none but the unhappy are worthy of friends ; if your soul had never suffered never could you have entered mine. I should admire, I should praise your talents, but I should keep aloof, because I have a sort of repugnance to that which fills my mind only : we must be calm to think ; when excited, agi- tated, we can only feel and suffer. You tell me that you are shaken by regrets, by remorse even ; that your sensibility is all pain. I believe you, and it grieves me ; and yet, I know not why, the impression that I receive from your letter is the contrary of that. There seems to me a calmness, a re- pose and force in all your expressions ; you appear to speak of what you have felt, not of what you are feeling ; in short, if I had rights, if I were sensitive, if friendship were not such a facile thing, I should tell you that Strasburg is far, very far from the rue Tarenne. President Montesquieu asserts that climate has a great in- 50 LETTERS OF [177.3 fluence on the moral condition ; is Strasburg more northerly than Paris ? Think how much I shall have to fear Peters- burg ! — No, I will not fear ; I Ijelieve in you ; I believe in your friendship. Explain to me why I have this confidence, but be careful not to think that vanity counts for anything. My feeling for you is purged of that vile alloy which cor- rupts and enfeebles all affections. You would have been very amiable had you told me whether my letter was the only one you found in Strasburg. See liow generous I am. I could be willing that it were changed for the one you wished to find there. Let us decide our ranks, give me my place ; but as I do not like to change, let it be a good one. I do not want that of the unhappy per- son who is displeased with you, nor that of her with whom you are displeased. I know not where you can place me; but do so if possible, that we may both be content ; do not bargain, give me much, you will see that I shall not abuse it. Oh ! you shall see how well I know how to love ! I can only love ; I know only how to love ! With moderate facul- ties, we can yet do much when we centre them on a single object. Well ! I have but one thought, and that thought fills my soul and all my life. You think that dissipation and new scenes and knowledge will distract you but little from your friends. Know your- self better ; yield in good faith and with good grace to the power which your nature has over your will, over your senti- ments, over all your actions. Persons who are governed by the need to love do not go to Petersburg. They may go very far, but if so, they are condemned to it, and they do not say that they " re-enter their souls " to find there what they love ; they believe they have never quitted it, be they a thousand leagues away. But there is more than one man- ner of being good and excellent ; yours will carry you far 1773] MLLE DE LESPINASSE. . 51 along in the path of advancement in every acceptation of those words. I should pity a sensitive woman to whom you would be the first object ; her life would be consumed by fears and re- grets ; but I should congratulate a vain woman, a proud woman : she would pass her life in applauding you, in adorn- ing herself to your taste. Such women love glory, they love the opinion of the world, and lustre. All that is very fine, very noble, but very cold, and very far from the passion which says : — " Death and Hell appear before me ; Raniire ! joyfully I go there for thee." But I am distracted — worse than that, I am singular; I have but one tone, one colour, one manner ; and when they please no longer they chill and weary. You must tell me which of the two effects they have produced. But you must also tell me, if you please, the only news that interests me, namely, how you are. The place of governor of the Ecole Militaire is not yet given. June 6, 1773. Ah ! how rare is that which gives pleasure, and how slowly it comes ! time seems infinite since the 24th, and I know not how much longer I shall have to wait for a letter from Dresden. But, at least, will you promise to be in- clined to write to me as often as you can ? Let me have, opposed to my pleasure, against my interests, only that which does not depend on you : I mean distance and the de- lay of couriers. But I fret lest your curiosity, your activity, in a word, your merits and your virtues should be against me. That love of glory, for instance, will make your love, or rather my own, one sorrow the more in my life. Yet you can say to me, as the hermit said to Zadig, " I have some- 52 . LETTERS OF [1773 times poured comfort into the souls of the sorrowful." Yes, I owe to you that which makes the charm and the sweetness of friendship; I feel that the tie is already too strong, that it takes too great an ascendancy over my soul ; when my soul suffers it is tempted to turn to you for consolation ; if it were calm and unoccupied it might be drawn to you by an impulse more active, by a desire for pleasure, even. Am I so much to you ? Am I not better fitted to love and regret you ? At best, my sentiments can only be agree- able to you ; but to me, before I examined your character, you were already necessary to me. But what think you of a soul that gives itself before knowing whether it will be accepted, before being able to judge whether it will be re- ceived with pleasure or with gratitude only ? Ah ! mon Dien ! if you were not gifted with feeling, what grief you would cause me ! For it does not suffice me that you are honourable : I have virtuous friends, I have letter still ; and yet I care only for what you are to me — but truly, sincerely, is there no madness, perhaps even absurdity, in believing you my friend ? Answer me ; not coldly, but with truth. Though your soul is agitated, it is not ill like mine, which passes ceaselessly from convulsion to depression. I can judge of nothmg ; I mislead myself continually •, I take poison to calm me. You see I cannot guide myself; en- lighten me, strengthen me. I will believe you ; you shall be my support ; you shall succour me like reflection itself, which is no longer at my service. I know not how to foresee. I can distinguish nothing. Conceive my trouble. I can rest only on the idea of death ; there are days when death is my only hope ; but also I have other instincts, and very contrary ones ; sometimes I feel myself manacled to life ; the thought of grieving him I love takes from me all desire to be com- forted, if it be at the cost of his peace of mind. 1773] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 53 In short, what can I say to you ? The excess of my in- consistency bewilders my mind, the weight of life is crushing my soul. WTiat must I do ? MTiat will become of me ? Will it be Charenton or the grave which will deliver me from myself ? I make you a victim if you care enough for me to take part in what I suffer, and I regret it ; but if I have caused you only ennui, I shall sink with confusion. Do not think you can hide this from me, whatever effort you may make to do so ; you cannot deceive my interest — But gratify it by telling me how you are ; have you had as much pleasure as you hoped, or less ? Is your health better than during the last days you were here ? You are very modest, you never told me how you were celebrated at Strasburg; verses were made in your honour; they were very bad, it is true, but the intention was so good ! Do not be angry. Tell me, have you read " Le Conn^table " on your journey [tragedy in rhyme by M. de Guibert] , not while posting, but aloud in good society ? Apropos of the " Connetable," if you had a certain sensibility, if you were like Montaigne and regarded me like another La B^otie, how I should pity you for deny- ing yourself the pleasure of giving me a mark of confidence, esteem, and affection ! I do not boast of myself, but I assure you I should be torn by remorse if I had treated you in that way. What does that prove ? — tell me. Adieu ; I know all the difference in our affections ; teach me the rcsemhlance ; that game [then in vogue] will never have been played with so much interest. Sunday, June 20, 1773. Oh ! mon Dicu ! are you dead, or have you already forgot- ten how keen and soiTowful is the remembrance of you in the souls you have left ? Not a word from you since May 24th ! It is very difficult not to believe it is a little 54 LETTERS OF [1773 your fault. If that is so, you deserve neither the regret my heart feels, nor the reproaches tliat it makes you. 1 knew that M. d'Aguesseau had received no news of you. I in- terest myself in you in a manner so true, so sincere, that I should have been delighted to liave heard that you had given him the preference over me. He deserves it, doubt- less in all respects ; but it is not justice that rules feeling. Do you believe that if that virtue governed me I should be uneasy at your silence, and need so many proofs of your friendship ? Alas, no ! I cannot even explain to myself why I am su concerned about you at this moment, for I heard yesterday some news which engulfs my soul in sorrow ; I have passed the night in tears ; but when my head and all my faculties were exhausted, when I gained one moment which was not a pain, I thought of you, and it seemed to me that had you been here I should have written you what I suffered and perhaps you would have come to me. Tell me if I deceive myself. When my soul suffers am I wrong to seek consolation in yours ? In the midst of travel and many interests so different from those that touch and affect the heart, can you still hear a language which is foreign to most men carried away by dissipation or intoxicated by vanity ? Nor is that language better known to those who, like you, are filled with the desire for knowledge and a love of fame. You are so con- vinced that sensibility is a sign of mediocrity that I faint with fear lest your soul should close itself wholly to this emo- tion. It is fifteen days since I wrote to you, and I believed yesterday that I would not write to you again until I heard from you. Suffering has softened my soul and I yield to it. At five o'clock this morning I took two grains of opium ; I obtained a calmness better than sleep ; my pain is less rend- ing; I feel myself crushed, with less force to resist. The 1773] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 55 violence of the soul is moderated ; I can speak to you, I can moan, but yesterday I had no power of expression. I could not have told you that I fear for the life of him I love ; I could have died sooner than pronounce those words that froze my heart. You have loved; conceive, therefore, what such terrors are. Until Wednesday next I am left in an uncertainty that horrifies me, but commands me, nevertheless, to live. Yes, it is not possible to die so long as we are loved — but it is dreadful to live. Death is the most urgent need of my soul, yet 1 feel myself manacled to life. Pity me ; forgive me for abusing the kindness you have shown me. Is it in you or in me tliat I find the confidence that draws me on ? They say that you cannot have found the King of Prussia in Berlin. Have you gone to Stettin to join him ? he was to be there till the 20th. I am so anxious ; it seems to me we could have had news of you from Berlin. How wrong of you if you have shown the slightest negligence. You know well that you gave me- your word of honour that some one should write to me if you were ill. But do not make use of that pretext which may content ordinary friendship which does not tvish to be made uneasy ; that would be detest- able ; I do not wish to be spared ; I wish to suffer through my friends, for my friends ; and I treasure a thousand times more the troubles that come to me through them than all the happiness on earth that is not derived from them. Good-bye ; the opium is still in my head ; it affects my sight ; perhaps it makes me more stupid than usual — what matter if it does ? it is not my mind, only my sorrows that interest you. Monday evening, June 21, 1773. I wrote to you yesterday, and I write to you again to- night. If I waited three days, that is, till Wednesday, per- 56 LETTERS OF [1773 haps I should never answer your letter of the 10th, which M. d'Aguesseau brought me to-day. In the first place (for there may still, perhaps, be a future for me), I must ask you to address your letters direct to me ; to send them through M. d'Aguesseau is to put one risk the more against me ; he may go into the country, or travel, etc. ; in short, it is enough that we are three thousand miles apart ; add nothing to them. Oh ! I shall surely seem mad to you : I am going to speak to you with the frankness, the self-abandonment one would have if death were certain on the morrow; listen to me, therefore, with the indulgence and the interest that we have for the dying. Your letter has done me good ; I expected it still, but I had ceased to desire it, because my soul could no longer have an emotion that resembled pleasure. Well, — shall I say it ? — you have given diversion for a few moments to the horror which absorbs my whole existence. Ah ! my God ! I fear for his life ; mine is fastened to his, yet I have need to talk with you. Can you conceive what it is that impels me, that drags me towards you ? Nevertheless, I am not content with your friendship ; I find a coldness, a carelessness in not telling me why you did not write to me from Dresden as you promised ; and besides, you make me feel in too marked a manner that your regret at not finding in Berlin what you hoped for has destroyed the pleasure you would otherwise have felt at the expression and proof of my friendship ; and then too, — shall I say it ? — I am wounded that you have not thanked me for the interest that I take in you. Do you think it any answer to this that I am very unjust, very difficult to please ? No, I am nothing of all that ; I am very true, very ill, and very unhappy — oh, yes, very unhappy. If I did not tell you what I feel, what I think, I could not 1773] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 57 speak to you at all. Do you believe that in the trouble in which I. am one has the power to restrain one's self ? For example, ought I to be touched by your manner of saying to me, as to the chief interest of my life, " Answer me on all this what you can, and what you like " ? Oh ! yes, what I like ! you leave me great liberty, but you see how I employ it, — not in criticising you, only in proving to you what you know even better than I : that we have the tone and expression of what we feel, and if I am not satisfied, it is not your fault — I know that well. But I claim nothing, unless it be that species of consola- tion which we so seldom allow ourselves : that of speaking out our whole thought. People are always restrained by a fear of the morrow ; I feel myself as free as though there were no morrow for me ; and if, by chance, I should live on, I foresee that I could forgive myself for having told you the truth at the risk of displeasing you. Is it not true that our friendship must be great, strong, and complete, our intimacy tender, solid, close, or else, nothing at all ? Therefore, I can never repent having shown you the depths of my soul. If that is not what you want, if there be any contempt for it, well ! let us be sincere ; let us not be shamed or embarrassed ; let us return whence we started, and believe that we have dreamed. We can add this clause to the chapter of experi- ence, and behave in future like those well-bred persons who know it is not polite to tell their dreams. We will keep silence about them ; silence is pleasant when it comforts self-love ! You will not tell me what rank you give me ; are you restrained by a fear of gi^dng me too much or too little ? that may be just, but it is not noble. Youth is so magnificent, it loves to give lavishly ; yet here you are as miserly as if you were old or rich. You ask the impossible ; you want me to 58 LETTERS OF [1773 pity you liecause you do your own will ; 1 am to combat you to restore your native spirit. Eh ! mon Dieu ! a little while and I will answer for it that your nature will govern you despotically ; the habit of conquermg will strengthen it, and there is little need of that ! You have said to yourself (I have long been sure of this) that it mattered nothing whether you were happy so long as you were great. Let things happen ; I will answer for it that you will be consist- ent; there is notliing vague or wavering about you except your feelings; your thoughts, your projects are fixed in an absolute manner. I am much deceived if you were not born to make the happiness of a vain soul and the despair of a feeling one. Own to me that what 1 am now saying does not displease you ; you will forgive me for loving you less when I prove to you that others will admire you more. You ask me a singular question, truly. You say, " Are there better reasons than myself for his absence ? " Yes, there are better, — one indeed that is absolute ; one that if he succeeds in subduing it, the sacrifice of my whole life cannot repay the debt. All the circumstances, all events, all moral and physical reasons are against him ; but he is so ardent for me that he will not permit me to have a doubt of his return. Nevertheless, I shudder at what I may hear on Wednesday : he spits blood ; he has been bled twice ; at the moment when the courier left him he was better ; but the hemorrhage may return ; and how can I be calm with that thought before me ? He himself fears the result ; though he tries to reassure me, I detect his fear. Tell me if you know of whom I speak ; and further, did you know it when I wrote to ask you for " Le Coundtable " I Is it delicacy or caution which makes you seem to ignore a name I have not mentioned to you ? But I am not speaking to you of your journey. If I could 1773] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 59 believe that I shall live and that you will not go to Eussia, I should eagerly desire that you might be detained in Berlin. But as I think that you always feel the need of doing diffi- cult things, I would like, now that you are once started, that you should make the tour of the world, — in order that it might once be done ; and then, could there be repose in the future ? Hardly would you return before you would start for Montauban [where his father lived] ; and after that, other projects ; for you cannot endure rest unless it be to make plans for travelling a thousand leagues. Yes, on my honour, I think it was a great misfortime for me the day that I spent one year ago at Moulin-Joli.^ I was far indeed from needing to form a new attachment ; my life and my soul were so filled that I was very far from desiring a new interest ; and you, you had no need of this additional proof of what you can inspire in an honoural)le and sensitive person. Oh ! it is pitiful ! Are we free agents ? Can what is be otherwise ? Were you not free to tell me that you would write to me often ? As for me, I am not free to cease to desire it eagerly. Having thus scolded you, I must add that you were very kind to write to me on your arrival; I deserved it, — yes, indeed I did. Thursday, June 24, 1773. Three times in one week ! It is too much, much too much, is it not ? But it is because I care for you enough to believe that I have made you uneasy. You must be feeling some impatience to know if I am still living. Well, yes ! I am condemned to live ; I am no longer at liberty to die ; I should do harm to one who desires to live for me. I have news of him to the 10th ; it does not altogether reassure 1 The house of the painter and litte'rateur, Watelet, on the banks of the Seine, where she met M. de Guibert for the first time. The gardens of this place were famous as among the first to be laid out in the English style. — Fr. Ed. 60 LETTERS OF [1773 me, but I hope that his hemorrhage may not have fatal results ; I even hope it may hasten his return ; but this hot vi^eather is a mortal injury to him, and I must wait. Ah ! mon Dieu ! always to see pleasure deferred, disap- pearing ! always to be engulfed, overwhelmed by sorrow ! If you knew what need I have of repose ! for one year I have been upon the rack. You alone, perhaps, have had the power to suspend my sorrow for a few instants; and that blessing of a moment has bound me to you forever. But tell me, — my last letter, did it displease you ? Do I not stand ill with you ? I should be grieved were it so ; but I am not like Mme. du Ohatelet ; I know no repentance. Answer me with the same frankness that I employ to you ; esteem me enough not to tell jue half the truth ; tell me all the evil you think of me ; and it is not, as M. de la Eoche- foucauld says, for the pleasure of hearing myself spoken of that I ask you to tell me this ; it is to judge if you are my friend, if — in a word — you can he my friend. I attach enough value to our intercourse to wish urgently to know what there may have been of sudden surprise, or mistake, in that which drew us to each other. It is said that nothing is stronger or better founded than the sentiments for which -we can give no reason. If that is true, I ought to rely upon your friend- ship ; but you will not have it so ; why is that ? Shall I not be satisfied with it ? Do you not know that the natural impulse after we have acquired a new possession is to examine it, to observe it on all sides ; this occupation is perhaps the highest joy that possession gives ; but you, you do not know all the details and all the pleasures of sensi- bility. Whatever is elevated, whatever is noble, whatever is grand, that is your sphere. The heroes of Corneille fix your attention ; scarcely do you cast your eyes on the little swains of Gessner. You love to admire, and I, I have but one need, 1773] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 61 oue will, — to love. What does it matter ? "We may not have the same language, but there is a sort of instinct that supplies all ; nothing, however, can fill the chasm of a thou- sand leagues of distance ! I was so troubled the last time I wrote that I did not tell you Diderot was in Holland; he likes it so well, he has already so many friends whom he never saw before, that it is quite possible that he may not return to Paris, and even forget that he was on his way to Russia. He is an extraor- dinary man, not in his place in society : he ought to be the leader of a sect, a Greek philosopher, teaching, instructing youth. He pleases me very much, but nothing about him reaches my soul ; his sensibilities are only skin-deep ; he never goes farther than emotion. I like nothing that is half and half, nothing that is undecided and not thorough. I cannot understand the ways of people in society ; they amuse themselves and yawn, they have friends and they love no one. All that seems to me deplorable. Yes, I prefer the torture that consumes my life to the pleasure that numbs theirs; with that fashion of being we may not be lovable, but we love, and that is a thousand times better than pleasing. How I should like to know if you are going to Eussia. I hope not, because, as you say, I desire it. Letters seem to me to come more slowly from Russia than from any other part of the world. I have re-read, twice, thrice, your letter ; first because it was difficult to read, next, because I was diffi- cult to please. Ah ! if you knew what faults of omission I found in it ! But why should you not make them ? M. d'Alembert is awaiting a letter from you with great impatience. M. de Crillon forestalled you. Your friend, M. dAguesseau seemed to me, at least on the day he brought me your letter, very extraordinary ; he had the air of a person in 62 LICT'J'KRS OF [1773 trouble ; his movements had something convulsive about them. He said he was ill, and I believe it ; he has a project of going to Spa. I do not know if he will, but 1 am glad he will not be with ycm. Adieu ; 1 have overwiielined ytju with (|ues- tions to which you do not iei)ly. I do not ask if y(ju would like me to send you the news, because it would be out of my power to put my mind to such things; but I know some- tliing that the public does not yet know, namely : that M. d'Aranda is appointed ambassador from Spain in place (jf M. de Fuentfes [father of the Marquis de Mora] and that the latter is given the first place at his Court. All this is of no interest to you, and it may astonish you that it is of great interest to me. Must 1 not be foolish to interest myself in things that happen in ]\Iadrid ? Adieu again. My style of folly is e(|ual to your piety. Send me news of yourself often and at length ; share, if you can, the pleasure that it will give me. How many letters do you receive that you are more eager to open than mine ? — three ? ten ? Thursday, July 1, 1773. Oh ! if you knew how unjust I am ! how I have accused you ! how I have told myself that I ought -to expect and desire nothing of your friendship ! And the cause of it all was merely that I received no letters from you. Tell me why we expect, why we exact so much from one on whom we do not rely. Ah ! truly, I believe you will forgive my incon- sistencies ; but I, I must not be so indulgent ; they hurt me more than they do you. I no longer know what I owe to you ; I no longer know what I give you ; I only know that your absence is heavy upon me ; yet I cannot assure myself that your presence would do me good. Ah ! mon Dieu ! what a horrible situation is that in which pleasure, consolation, friendship, all, in short, becomes poison ! \Miat must I do ? i::3] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 63 tell me ; how recover calmness ? I know not where to look for strength to resist impressions so deep and so diverse. Oh ! how many times we die before death ! All things dis- tress and injure me ; yet the liberty to deliver myself from the bm'den that is crushing me is taken from me. Laden with sorrow, there is one who wishes me to live ; I am torn both ways — by despair, and by the pity that another makes me feel. Ah ! my God ! can it be that to love, to be loved, is not a good ? I suffer every pain, and, more than that, I trouble the repose, I make the unhappiiiess, of the one I love. My soul is exliausted by sorrow ; my bodily frame is destroyed, and yet I live, and I must live. AVHiy do you require it ? what niatt€rs my life to you ? of what value do you reckon it ? what am I to you ? Your soul is so busy, your life so full and so active, how can you find time to pity my woes ? and have you indeed enough feeling to respond to my friendship ? All ! you are very amiable ; you have the tone of interest, but it seems to me it is not I who inspire it. My letters are neces- sary to you ; perhaps that is true — yes, as you say so ; but why be so long iu writing to me ? and why not send yom^ letters direct ? Strasburg delays them for two or three days. I am enchanted (and it was thus I intended to begin my letter) that you have been satisfied with the King of Prussia. AMiat you tell me of that magic vapour that surrounds him is so charming, so noble, so just, that I cannot be silent about it ; I have read it to all those who deserved to hear it. Mme. Geoffrin asked me to give her a copy. I have sent it far and near, and it will be felt. So you are not going to Russia ? I am glad. Let me tell you again how charming I find your friendship ; you answer me, you converse, you are still beside me though a thousand leagues distant. But how comes it that that woman does not love you to madness, as you wish 64 LETTERS OF [1773 to be loved, as you deserve to be ? haw else can she employ her soul and her life ? Ah ! she has neither taste nor sensi- bility ; of that I am sure. She ought to love you, if only from vanity — but why do I meddle in all this ? You are satisfied, or if you are not, you love the ill she does you ; why, therefore, should I pity you ? But that other unhappy person ! it is she who interests me ; have you written to her ? is her pain as deep as ever ? I must tell you that the other day at Mme. de Boufflers much was said of you and " Le Connd table," and the yoimg Comtesse de Boufflers told me that she believed you were very much in love, and this belief had made her watch Mme. de . . . with great attention. A man present assured us that you no longer loved her; j'ou had done so, but the feeling had worn out, and he thought you would never be long happy or unhappy for the same woman ; he said the activity of your soul did not allow it to fix itself long on one object ; and from that arose a witty discussion on matters of feeling and passion. The Comtesse de Boufflers finally said that she did not know who it was with whom you were in love, but it certainly was no longer Mme. de . . . and she judged, by the notes she had received from you at the time of your departure, that you were strongly attached to some one and that your absence from her rent your soul ; but then came the natural reflection : " Why does he go to Russia ? " Perhaps to cure himself, perhaps to stifle the feelings of the woman he loves. At last, after many conjec- tures of no interest, I was asked if I liked you, if I knew you well, for until then I had not said a word : " Yes, I like him much ; after knowing him a little there is only one way of liking him." " Well, then, you know his intimacies ; who is the object of his passion ? " " No, truly, I know nothing ; except that he is now in Berlin and is well ; that the King of Prussia has received him admirably and is to show him his 1773] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 65 troops ; after that, he goes to Silesia ; that is all I know, and all that interests me." After this we talked of the Opera, of Madame la Dauphine and of a thousand " interesting " things. I tell you all this to show you that I do not like society to gossip about your affections, your dislikes, your inconstancies. I like to hear only of your merit, your virtue, your talents ; am I wrong ? I have written three times to Berlin since the 6th of June. No doubt they will forward your letters; I remember the desire you will have to receive certain letters, " the de- privation of which turned your head." For pity's sake do not treat me so well ; do not write to me first, because then (without being aware of it) you will write to me merely for the sake of saying )0u have written. Do not come to me until you have nothing more to say to lier ; that is in the order of things ; friendship comes after, sometimes at a great distance, sometimes very near — too near perhaps — the un- happy love ! We love so much that which comforts us ! it is so sweet to love that which gives us pleasure. I do not know why it is, but something warns me that I shall say of your fiiendship what Comte d'Argenson said on seeing, for the first time, his pretty niece. Mile, de Berville. "Ah!" he cried, " she is very pretty ! let us hope she will give us many griefs." What do you think of that ? But you are so strong, so moderate, and above all so occupied, that you are equally sheltered from great sorrows and little giiefs. That is how minds should be, how talents should be ; it is that which renders human beings superior to events. And when, with that, a man is as honourable and, above all, as feeling as you are, he is no doubt painfully affected, — enough so to satisfy ordinary friendship ; but he is soon diverted from the emo- tions of his soul when his head is eagerly and deeply 66 LETTERS OF [1773 occupied. I predict this of you, and I am glad of it : you will never experience those sorrows which convulse the soul; you are young enough to still receive a few slight shocks, but, I answer for it; you will soon recover ywur balance ; ah, yes ! I answer for it, and you will make a great career and have a great celebrity — I shall horrify you, I shall show you a very paltry and common soul, but I cannot bear that idea. Every time that I think of you in the future I have an icy feeling ; it is not because what is great attracts admiration and crushes me, but because that which is great so rarely deserves to be loved. Admit that I am almost as silly as I am wild ; I am much worse than either. I have that particular style which Vol- taire (I venture to name him) sajs is the only bad style ; I fathom you so well that I know I need not tell you it is the xDearying style. The difference in our affections is this : you are at the other end of the world, you are calm enough to enjoy everything ; while I am in Paris, I suffer, and I enjoy nothing ; " that is all," as Marivaux says. I have received many details regarding liim. I see there is nothing now to fear from this last hemorrhage ; but ask yourself if it is possible to have a moment's peace while trembling for the life of one to whom one would sacrifice one's own life at every instant. Ah ! if you did but know how lov- able he is, how worthy of being loved ! His soul is gentle, tender, strong ; I am certain he is the man in all the world who would please and suit you most. . . . It is you who give me faults ; you have that exclusive privilege. I am with all my other fi-iends the best and easiest of beings ; they always favour me, they forestall me in every way ; I spend my life in tlianking them and praising tliem, and I c faults. I have no self- love with you ; I do not comprehend those rules of conduct that make us so content with self and so cold to those we love. I detest prudence, I even hate (suffer me to say so) those " duties of friendship " which substitute propriety for interest, and circumspection for feeling. How shall I say it ? I love the abandonment to impulse, I act from impulse only, and I love to madness that others do the same by me. Ah ! mon Dieu ! how far I am from being equal to you ! I have not your virtues, I know no duties with my friend ; I am closer to the state of nature ; savages do not love with more simplicity and good faith. The world, misfortunes, evils, nothing has corrupted my heart. I shall never be on my guard against you ; I shall never suspect you. You say that you have friendship for me ; you are virtuous ; what can I fear ? I will let you see the trouble, the agitation of my soul, and I shall not blush to seem to you weak and incon- sistent. I have already told you that I do not seek to please you ; I do not wish to usurp your esteem. I prefer to de- serve your indulgence — in short, I want to love you with all my heart and to place in you a confidence without reserve. 76 LETTERS OF [1773 No, I do not think you "sly" [fin] ; I think, as you do, that slyness is always a proof of famine of mind ; but I do think you stiipid for not understanding that which has been clearly designated to you. What matters his name ? enough that it does not injure that which I have told you of himself. What surprises me is that I have named him to you a score of times ; this proves to me, what I did not believe, that I can mention his name like that of any other man ; but I shall be still more surprised if, when you return, you cannot distinguish him among the others ; for I assure you he is not made to be lost in a crowd ; you will see. I saw the Chevalier d'Aguesseau to-day, and was proud to be able to give him news of you. With the other persons wl;o expect to hear from you I have a contrary feeling. I fear to seem to them more fortunate than they, and thus get you blamed ; for most women have no need of being loved, they only want to be preferred. I shall be very glad to see the Chevalier de Chastellux once more ; still, if I could add to his journey what I desire to subtract from yours, I should not see him soon. (3bserve, I beg of you, how I reverse the chronological order : I have loved the chevalier these eight years. Adieu ; I have not told you that I am ill as a dumb animal ; but my soul suffers less, therefore I must not complain. Sunday, August 8, 1773. What folly to go in search of you, to send my letter to await you in Breslau, where you will be occupied with the king, the troops, your successes, etc., and nothing will incline you to cast your eyes on Paris. I am wrong ; Paris is too grand to be forgotten, but me you would overlook in the crowd. Nevertheless, if I did not fear to grieve you I should say : " There is no one who regrets you more sincerely than I." Every one is busy or dissipating. I alone, I believe. 1773] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 77 cannot lose from sight that which distresses me, or that which I desire. I do not know how persons manage to grow used to privations ; those that touch the soul are so keen ! they have no compensations. I cannot believe that it is only three months since you departed ; still less can I conceive how I can wait for }-ou till the end of November. Your presence could not fail to comfort me ; I regret it as my pleasure. Ah ! friendship, that blessing of nature, is it to me a fresh sorrow ? Does all that affects my soul turn to poison ? You were to me a charm- ing acquaintance ; your tone, yom' manners, your mind, they all pleased me ; a higher degree of interest in you has spoiled all : I yielded myself up to the good you did me. Ah ! why have you penetrated within my soul ? Why did you show me yours ? Why establish so intimate an intercourse between two persons whom all things separate ? Is it you, or is it I, who are guilty of the species of pain from which I suffer ? Sometimes I am arrested in my desire for your return by the fear that you will wound my friendship ; and yet it is not exacting. You will be so occupied, so carried-away, so dissi- pated, that, perhaps, you may be as far from me in Paris as at Breslau. Well, so be it ; I shall see you seldom and await you often ; that will be something. But are you not thinkmg to shorten your journey rather than prolong it ? W^hat can you see better or more inter- esting than what you are now seeing in Silesia ? And then if you go to Sweden and do not write from there you will receive no letters ; we may be three months without news of you, and that would no longer be absence, it would be death. In a word, be it justice or generosity, I must have news of you, and there is neither reason nor pretext which can justify you for being so long without writing to me as you were between Prague and Vienna. Reflect that you owe much to my con- 78 LETTERS OF [1773 dition ; I am ill, I am unhappy ; does not that solicit your goodness ? What it grants will be repaid by infinite grati- tude. Good God ! what a poor motive ! what a pitiable sentiment ! Do you not think so ? I have just read an extract from the " Eulogj' on Colbert " now competing at the French Academy. The tone of it seemed to me so firm, so noble, so lofty, so original, that I suddenly wished it were yours. I do not know if the rest is as worthy, but you would not disavow the little I have seen of it.^ I have had fever for some days; the last time I wrote to you I finished my letter while trembling in a chill. There is a certain postman who, for the past year, has given fever to my soul, Ijut now it has attained my poor body. I feel destroyed ; and I have always been so unfortunate that something tells me I shall die at the moment when my mis- fortunes end. Eeturn, and at least I shall be sure of having tasted before I die a cons(jlation very sweet to my soul. I reproach myself for ever having been unjust to you. Mon Dieu ! you have suffered, and you will pardon me ; there are situations which ask for so mucli indulgence ! I have read the long-expected book of M. Helvetius [" Of Man; his Intellectual Faculties and his Education," a post- humous work]. I was alarmed at its size ; two volumes, of six hundred pages each ! Your voracity would have made an end of it in two days ; but as for me, I can no longer read with interest ; my affections withhold my attention ; I read what I feel, and not what I see. Ah ! mon Dieu ! how the mind shrinks by loving ! it is true that the soul does not, but what can one do with a soul ? I forgot to answer you aljout the affair of Comte de C . . . ; it is even less advanced than at first; you could hardly believe what a poor creature he is on whom the matter depends ; he is not stupid, but the ^ It was by M. Neeker, and Utok tlii' prize. — Fr. Ed. 1773] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 79 silliest of men. His wife is better than he ; but the absorp- tion she has in herself absorbs all her faculties. On the whole, they are persons whose real merit is to have a good cook. How many people of whom the world speaks well have no other value ! No, the human species is not wicked ; it is only silly, and in Paris it is as vain and frivolous as it is silly; but no matter, provided what one loves is kind, amiable, and excellent. Ah ! if )'ou knew what amuses and attracts the public ! — a tragedy by M. Dorat (devoid of wit, interest, and talent), and next a comedy by M. Dorat, which is a masterpiece of bad taste and bad style ; it is an imintelligible jargon. The applause given to it really saddened me the other day ; it is enough to discourage talent. Sunday, August 15, 1773. Listen to me, and once for all l)elieve that I cannot wrong you, and you know why I cannot wrong you. I have not been negligent ; this is my fifth letter since July, 3d. I do not see why you had not received mine of Jul}- 15th on the 3d of August. I cannot endure the irregularities of the post ; they are the torment of my life ; but you surprise me, you, by attaching such importance to my letters. How could you have the idea that I meant to harass you ? Pimish you ? — and for what ? Supposing, what is assuredly not so, that I were dissatisfied with your friendship, have I the right to complain of it ? Would it not be the height of imperti- nence to imagine that the loss of my letters was a painful privation to you ? If I tell you that I am not so foolishly vain as most women, you are not obliged to believe me ; but know me better and you will find that I receive as a favour that which is given me ; that I enjoy it with feeling, and respond to it with all the tenderness and sincerity of my soul ; but never do I feel myself prompted by the sort of 80 LETTERS OF [1773 confidence that is found, not in the heart, but in a vanity that exacts from those we love, and sometimes dares to put them to the proof. Intercourse with the world has not altered the simplicity and truth of my sentiments. Eemark that I am not praising, but defending myself. I am sorry and uneasy about the pain in your leg ; you do not take care of it, though you say you do; and I am more uneasy at that than for the pain itself. Alas ! the great evil of absence is ignorance of the details that touch us closely. While saying much, still more is left unsaid ; and it seems to me that my friend always omits tliat which I most need to know. Why do you wear yourself out with fatigue ? The loss of sleep exhausts the brain, and, strong as you may be, I am certain that b}- sitting up all night you do not get the best of the things and objects you are seeking to observe — not to speak of the risk you run of weakening your health. To reach the object for which you aim, you must not only live, but keep well ; in exalting the soul to the point of sacrificing all to its love of glory, I believe it is well to preserve the stomach. Ah ! if you knew how physi- cal sufferings belittle the soul you would not squander as you do 3'our sleep and your strength. I am speaking a very trivial language to you, but it is that of friendship. Eemark that those who wish to please never say a word of all this. The tone of interest has no grace, it is ponderous, it repeats itself — but it does not weary those who feel it for one who deserves it so well. I cannot help thinking that the uueasmess in which you were when you wrote to me disturbed your judgment a little. You urged me to write to you without telling me where to address my letter. I know that you were not in Vienna after the 12th at the latest, yet I must send my letter there ; there is no sense in that. And another thing, equally sense- 1773] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 81 less, was writing to you at Breslaii. But why, when making the tour of the world, should any one desire to hear from his friends ? Yes, you are very inconsistent ! in fact, there are moments when I am so weary that I am tempted to leave you on the way. I am ill, I am sad, and it seems to me that I should serve you best by letting myself be forgotten. The more kindness, the more feeling you might show me, the more I should dare to tell you that you will often repent havmg yielded yourself too quickly to an intimacy from which I alone obtain advantage. There is a clause in your letter on which I dared not rest my eyes, though my soul fastened on it. Mon Dieu I what word was that you said ! it froze my blood ! No, no, my soul shall seek for yours no more. Ah ! that thought will kill me ! Be my consolation ; calm, if you can, the trouble of my soul ; but do not think that I could, for one iastant, sur\dve a disaster the very fear of which fills my life with a terror that has-destroyed my health and disturbs, incessantly, my reason. Adieu, I cannot continue ; my heart is wrung ; if I compose my mind I will resume ; because I must justify myself on the matter of which you speak, and ask your pardon, though I am not guilty. Still Sunday. I intended to warn you that I had repeated your remark on the King of Prussia, which was so charming that I thought I might do so without impropriety. It was thought what it is, and it went far and wide until it reached Mme. du Deffand, who thought it very bad, and twisted and commented upon it, and foimd, as she thought, many con- tradictions to it. She ended by saying that if your " Conn^- table " were another " Athalie " it would not prevent her from thinking the form and basis of that thought of yours de- testable. Some days later she spoke of it in the same 6 82 LETTERS OF [1773 tone to the , Neapolitan ambassador [Caraccioli] ; this made him angry, and he told her that when people criti- cised they ought to quote honestly, and by changing the words of the speech he thought her criticism as unjust as it was severe. Mme. de Luxembourg and Mme. de Beauvau, before whom this occurred and who were against Mme. du Deffand, asked the ambassador for a copy of the actual remark ; he promised it ; then he came and told me the whole of this silly dispute, and I own that the pleasure of confounding Mme. du Deffand made me yield to his request. I copied the three lines for him and he went off' triumphant. Mme. du Deffand was confounded ; at any rate she dared no longer disparage that which everybody else thought charm- ing. Until then, there had been no question to whom you had written it. She now took it into her head to ask that question ; the ambassador refused to reply, and this increased her curiosity. Finally, he said it was written to me, and added : " No doubt it was a presentiment that made you condemn a saying so full of wit and grace." — There 's a long tale ; I should have told you earlier, but it seemed to me rather paltry to send a thousand leagues. I must add that the ambassador brought the copy back to me, and I burned it. Just see what silly things occupy these people of the world ! what empty minds it proves ! Yes, unhappi- ness is good for something; it corrects the little passions which agitate the idle and the corrupt. Ah ! if they could only love they would all become good. You can see, now, whether I was guilty of indiscretion. If you say I was, I shall believe it ; but do not tell me that people will think " we wa-ite to each other to say witty things." Ah ! what matter to us if fools and malicious peo- ple tliink so ? They are strong only when they are feared ; I hate and flee them, but I fear them no longer. For sev- 1773] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 83 eral years I have so weighed and estimated those who judge that I dare not tell you the contempt I have for opinion. I do not wish to brave it, and that is all. There is a passion that closes the soul to all the miseries which torture the people of the great world ; I have the sad experience of it. A great woe kills all the rest. There is but one in- terest, one pleasure, one misfortune, and a single judge for me in all creation. Oh ! no, I am not petty. Eeflect that I hold to life at one point only ; if it escapes me, I shall die. From this inward conviction, profound and permanent, you can readily believe that all else is annihi- lated for me. I know not by what fatality — or what good fortune — I became susceptible of a new affection : searching within myself I can neither find nor explain its cause ; but, such as it is, its effects have brought sweetness to my life. It seems to me an astounding thing that my sorrows should interest you ; it proves to me the goodness, the sensibility of your heart. I reproach myself, just now, for the remorse I have felt in yielding to my penchant for you : sorrow makes one severe to one's self ; I feel guilty for the good you do me. Is it now, or was it then that I made myself illusions ? On my honour I do not know. But you, whose soul is not convulsed by trouble, you can judge me better ; and when I see you, you will tell me if I ought to rejoice or despair at the feelings you inspire within me. — I received yesterday news of him which alarms me ; his health does not improve ; he is perpetually threatened by a fatal attack from which he has been twice at death's door within a year ; how is it possible that he should live ? Adieu ; send me news of youi"self. Monday, August 16, 1773. I open my letter to tell you how conscious I am of yx)ur kindness in being so uneasy at receiving no letter from me. 84 LETTERS OF (1773 I cannot imagine why ; for my friends take my letters them- selves to the general post-office. Why have you renounced your journey to the North ? I cannot believe it is solely to shorten the period of your absence. To whom are you mak- ing the sacrifice of Sweden ? If some one has exacted it, you are doubtless content. Well, if your return is hastened I will love the person or thing that is the cause of it. But next year ? must you go to Eussia ? and must you not go at once to Montauban ? and then to that country-seat where you will find pleasure and seek happiness, and then — and then — but no matter, anythmg is better than Sweden; and I know not — that is, something tells me not to be anxious about what may happen next year ; as you say yourself, there is time between now and then to die a hundred times. You have made me a reproach ; I have a mind to return it : are you guilty of what the Chevalier de Chastellux has writ- ten to me, namely, that I love you deeply ? How does he know it ? I have given my secret to none but you and him to whom I tell all. Can it be that you have told the Cheva- lier ? If it were so, I could only thank you, and complain. M. d'Alembert is at this moment with Mme. Geoffrin. I do not doubt she will think it a pleasure to write to the King of Poland [Stanislas-Poniatowski]. It occurs to me that in this long letter*! have omitted a rather interesting point : my health ; it is detestable ; I cough friglitfully, and with such effort that I spit blood. I spend a part of my life unable to speak ; my voice is extinct, but this of all inconveniences is the one that suits the inclinations of my soul the best ; I like silence, meditation, retirement. I do not sleep, or scarcely so, and I am never dull. You will think from this that I must be very happy. If I add that I would not change my condition for that of any other living being you will think 1773] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. • 85 me in paradise — and you will be wrong ; to go there one . must die, and that is what I wish to do. But come ; and write me often, often. August 22, 1773. I received yesterday your letter of the 10th, and it has done me good. If you only knew what I have suffered dur- ing the last eight days! how wrung with grief my heart has been ! in what distress, in what alarms my life is spent ! I have no longer the liberty to free myself; it is awful; and it is not in the power of him I love to make my troubles cease. He knows them, he suffers from them, he is still more unliappy than I, because his soul is stronger, and has more energy, more sensibility than mine. For one whole year every moment of his life has been marked by misfor- tune ; he must die of it, yet he wills that I shall live. Oh ! my God ! my soul cannot suffice for what it feels and what it suffers. See my weakness, see how sorrow makes one selfish and indiscreet; I make you think of me, I sadden you perhaps. Ah ! forgive me ; this excess of confidence comes from my friendship, my tender friendship for you. You have shown me such kindness, such indulgence that it seems to me I cannot abuse it. If you, alas ! were to suffer, who could feel and share it more than I ? You see within my soul, you know what it has for you. Ah ! I feel, at the summit of woe, invoking death at every instant, that it will cost me a regret to leave you ; you console me, and yet I sink beneath the weight of my sorrows — No, no ! they are not mine that rend me, they are his, for which I have neither remedy nor consolation : that is the torture of a feelmg and devoted soul. You have loved, you will under- stand and pity me. After what you wrote to M. d'Alembert I counted on seeing you by the end of September, and now I find you 86 LETTERS OF [1773 will not be here till the end of October ; but will you be here then ? Alas ! I know not if I may dare to hope so far before me. Perhaps I am speaking to you now for the last time. I dare not permit myself either hope or project. Ah ! I had suffered much from the injustice and malignancy of men ; they reduced me to despair ; but I here avow that there is no sorrow comparable to that of a deep, unhappy passion : it has effaced my ten years' early torture. It seems to me that I live only since I love; all that affected me, all that rendered me unhappy until then is obliterated ; and yet in the eyes of calm and reasonable people I have no sorrows but those I have ceased to feel; they call passion a ficti- tious sorrow. Alas ! it is because they love nothing, because they live only for vanity and ambition, and I, I live only to love ; no longer have I the tone or the feelings of society. More than that, I am uicapable of fulfilling its duties ; but fortunately I am free, I am independent, and in yielding myself up wholly to my inclinations I have no remorse, because I harm no one. But see how little you ought to think of me ; I reproach myself often for the kindness and the esteem that is shown to me ; I usurp so much in society ; people judge me too favourably because they do not know me. It is true that I have been so great a victim to calumny and the malice of enemies that I feel my present position to be a sort of compensation. May I make you a reproach ? my friendship misses your confidence ; you no longer tell me of yourself ; why is that ? I was unjust to you once, I know ; is it thus you punish me ? How is it that if you love you have nothing to say to me ? You suffer, you hope, you enjoy ; why, then, do you tell me nothing ? You speak to me so little of yourself that your letters might go to nearly every woman of your acquaint- ance. It is not so with mine; they can go to but one 1773] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 87 address. Am I wrong ? is it too much to exact equality in confidence ? This is the fourth letter you have still to acknowledge, do not forget that. I think it was folly to have written to you at Breslau ; you may not have thought of the post and my letter will still be there. You must burn all my letters. I fancy that I see them falling in great bundles from your pockets ; the disorder in which you keep your papers affects my confidence — but you see it does not check it. Adieu. I have pain in my chest. Is your leg cured ? Send me news of yourself. Monday, September 6, 1773. Your silence hurts me. I do not blame you, but I suffer, and I can scarcely persuade myself that if your interest were equal to mine I should be one month without hearing from you. Mon Dieu ! tell me, what value do you place on friend- ship if absence and travel distract you from it wholly ? Ah ! how fortunate you are ! A king, an emperor, troops, camps, can make you forget the one who loves you and (more touch- ing perhaps to a feeling soul) tlie person whom your friend- ship sustains and consoles. No ; I do not blame you ; I even wish that your forgetfulness did not seem to me a wrong ; I should like to find within me the disposition that approves of all, or suffers all without complaint. I know not why I was persuaded that I should hear from you at Breslau whether you received my letter, or whether it were lost ; my hope was balked. Oh ! I hate you for making me know hope, fear, pain, pleasure ; I had no need of those emotions — why did you not leave me in repose ? My soul had no need to love ; it was filled with a tender senti- ment, profound, participated, mutual, but sorrowful neverthe- less ; and that son-ow was the emotion that drew me to you. I meant that you should only please me, but you have 88 LETTERS OF [1773 touched me ; in consoling me you have bound me to you, and the singular thing is that the good you have done me, which I received without consenting to it, far from rendering me supple, docile, like other persons who receive favours, seems, on the contrary, to have given me the right to be exacting on your friendship. You, who judge from heights and see into depths, tell me if that is the action of an ungrateful soul, or of one too sensitive : whatever you say of it I shall believe. Keturn speedily ; I see the days slip by with a pleasure I cannot express. They say the past is nothing; but as for me, it crushes me ; it is precisely because I have suffered so much that it is so dreadful to me to suffer still. Ah ! but there is madness in promising myself some sweetness, some consolation in your friendship ; you will have gained so many new ideas, your soul lias been agitated by so many diverse sentiments that no trace of the impression you received of my sorrow and my confidence will remain. But come, come at any rate ; I shall judge, and I shall see clear — for illusions are not for the sorrowful. Besides, you have as much openness as I have truth ; we shall not for one moment deceive ourselves ; come, therefore, and do not bring back from your journey the melanclioly impressions the Chevalier de Chastellux has brought from Italy. He speaks of all that he has seen without pleasure, and all that he now sees gives him but little more. I would not change my ways of thinking for his, and yet I pass my life in convul- sions of fear and pain ; but then, what I expect, what I desire, what I obtain, what is given to me, has such value to my soul! I live, I exist with such force that there are moments when I find myself lovmg madly to my own unhappiness. Ought I not to cling to it ? ought it not to be dear to me ? It caused me to know you, to love you, and, 1773] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 89 perhaps, to have one friend the more — for you tell me so. If I had been calm, reasonable, cold, all this would not have happened. I should vegetate with the other women, who flirt their fans and discuss the sentence on M. de Morangies and the arrival of the Comtesse de Provence. Yes, I repeat it : I prefer my griefs to all that people in society call happiness and pleasure. I may die of them per- haps, but that is better than never having lived. Do you understand me ? are you on my key ? have you forgotten that you too have been as ill, but more fortunate than I ? Adieu ; I do not know how it is, I meant to write you four lines only, but my pleasure in doing so has led me on. How many persons are there whom you will see on your return with greater pleasure than you will me ? I will give you the list : Madame de . . . , the Chevalier d'Aguesseau, the Comte de Broglie, the Prince de Beauvau, the Comte de Eocham- beau, etc., etc., and Mesdames de Beauvau, de Boufflers, de Rochambeau, de Martin ville, etc., etc. ; then the Chevalier de Chastellux, and then I, at last, the last. Ah ! see the differ- ence : I can name but one against your ten ; the heart does not conduct itself by law and justice ; it is despotic and absolute. I forgive you ; but — return. M. d'Alembert awaits you with impatience. The Cheva- lier de Chastellux is absorbed by the comedies at Mme. d'Epinay's, but his tone is cold and sad. Adieu ; do you really think that I shall see you in a month ? That is too far off to feel any pleasure from it yet. November, 1773. Here I am : courage failed me ! When I have not what I love I prefer to be alone : I talk then to my friends more intimately, — more unreservedly. I have just written for three hours, and I am blinded by it, but not wearied. Mme. de Boufflers permits me to ask you for a copy of her letter ; 90 LETTERS OF [1773 bring it to ine to-morrow, I beg of you ; and bring me also the continuation of your journey which gives me such infinite pleasure. Is it in the morning or is it in the evening that I am to see you ? I should like the morning, because that is sooner, and the evening, because that is longer, but I shall like whatever you choose to give me. Adieu ; I did not sleep last night. Ilalf-past eight o'clock, 1773. Mon ami, I shall not see you, and you will tell me that it is not your fault ! but if you had had the thousandth part of the desire I have to see you, you would be here, and I should be happy. No, I am wrong, I should suffer ; but I should not envy the pleasures of heaven. Mon ami, I love you as one should love, to excess, to madness, with transport and despair. All these last days you have put my soul to the torture ; I saw you this morning, and 1 forgot it all ! It seems to me that I cannot do enough for you in loving you with all my soul, in being in the mind to live and die for you. You are worth more than that ; yes, if I only loved you, it would be nothing ; for what is sweeter and more natural than to love wildly that which is perfectly lovable ? Mon ami, I can do better than love, I know how to suffer ; I know how to renounce my pleasure for your happiness. But there is one who troubles the satisfaction I should have in proving to you that I love you. Do you know why I write to you ? Because it pleases me ; you would never think it if I did not tell you. But oh ! where are you ? If you are happy I must not complain that you have taken happiness from me. December, 1773. Good-morning, mon ami. Have you slept ? how are you ? shall I see you ? Ah ! take nothing from me ; the time is so short and I set such value on that which I spend in seeing 1773] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 91 you. Mon ami, I have no opium in my head, nor in my blood ; I have worse than that, I have that which would make me bless heaven and treasure life if he I love were inspired with the same emotion ; but alas ! what we love is made to be the torment, the despair of the soul that feels ? Good-bye ; I want to see you, you ought to come and dine with me at Mme. GeoiTrin's. I dared not tell you so last night. Yes, you ought to love me passionately ; I exact nothing ; I pardon all ; and I have never had an angry feeling, mon ami ; I am perfect, for I love you in perfection. Four o'clock, 1773. You have not started ; at least, I hope not. This is what I fancy you will have said to yourself : " The weather is dreadful; I will go to-morrow to the country, I will be driven there ; I will see her this afternoon ; I will go and spend the evening with Mme. de V . . ." Mon ami, if you can reason thus, M. d'Alembert will permit you to argue in future, and you will not be reduced to making or not making Conn^tables. Racine would never have allowed any one to prevent him from writing his " Letters " on the Visionaries or his " History of Port-Royal." Here are the two volumes ; I warn you that if you lose them you will be lost in M. d'Alembert's opinion. Here is also Plutarch ; that is mine ; but, if it is all the same to you, I would rather it were not lost or torn. I saw Mme. de M . . . at mass and spoke to her. Her face and figure satisfy the most fastidious and exacting taste ; but her tone, her manner, ah ! how repulsive they are ! Am I wrong? But her friend does not resemble her; yes, I believe this, and I even desire it ; is this feeling generous ? tell me. No, you shall never know all that the ambassador wrote 92 LETTERS OF [1774 to me ; but hear this : he said that, judging by appearances, M. de G . . . had obtained that which M. de M . . . had desired to obtain ; and then he added : " I am not afraid lest his piercing eyes shoukl see these words ; I consent that those of M. de M . . . should read this letter as he reads your soul," etc. ; adding a hundred lively little jests very gay and clever ; he is certainly charming, but quite undeserving of being loved. — Mon ami, you advised me yesterday not to love you ; is it I or yourself whom you wish to save from that misfortune ? — tell me. I liave an infallible remedy : how sweet it will be to me if I can think that I do anything for you. Mon ami, this soul which is like a thermometer, now at freezing, then at temperate, and a moment after at the burn- ing heat of the equator, this soul, thus carried away by an irresistible force, finds it hard to curb and calm itself; it longs for you, it fears you, it loves you, it wanders in a wilderness, but always it belongs to you and to its regrets. 1774. Mon ami, yesterday, coming home at midnight, I found ycnir letter. I did not expect such good luck ; but what grieves me is the number of days that must pass without my seeing you. Ah ! if you knew what the days are, what the life is, stripped of the interest and the pleasure of seeing you ! Mon ami, amusements, occupations, activity are all you need, but I, my happiness is you, and only you ; I would not wish to live if I could not see you, could not love you at every in- stant of my life. Send me news of yourself, and come and dine to-morrow with Comte C . . . He asked me to change from Sunday to Saturday; I said yes; but come there, I entreat you. I was to dine to-day at the Spanish ambas- sador's, but I have excused myself ; if you were to be there 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 93 I would not have done so. Good-bye. I am expecting the letter you promised me. I am much hurried. 1774. I yield to the need of my heart, mon ami: I love you ; I feel as much pleasure and anguish as if it were the first and the last time in my life that I should say those words to you. Ah ! why have you condemned me to say them ? Why am I reduced to do so ? You will know some day — alas ! you will then understand me. It is dreadful to me to be no longer free to suffer for you and through you. Is that loving you enough ? Adieu, man ami. At all the instants of my life. 1774. Mon ami, I suffer, I love you, and I await you. Tuesday, 1774. Mon ami, you make me prove that we like better to give than to pay our debts. I have several letters to answer, and to come to them I must begin by talking with you. Mon ami, have you given me, since last night, one minute, two minutes ? Have you said, " She suffers, she loves me, and I must blame myself for a part of her sorrows " ? It is not to distress you or to give you remorse that I say that, but to make you kind, indulgent, and not angry when a few cries of pain escape me. As for me, I have thought of you, and much, but my time has been occupied. — Good God ! was there ever such pride, such disdain of others, such contempt, such injustice, in a word, such an assemblage and assortment of all that peoples hell and lunatic asjdums ? All that was last night in my apartment, and the walls and ceilings did not crumble down ; a miracle ! In the midst of the sorry writers, smatterers, fools, and pedants, among whom I spent my day, I thought of you alone 94 LETTERS OF [1774 and of your follies ; I regi'etted you ; I longed for you with as much passion as if you were the most amiable, most reasonable being that existed. I cannot explain to myself the charm that binds me to you. You are not my friend ; you can never become so : I have no sort of confidence in you ; you have caused me the deepest, sharpest pain that can afflict and rend an honest soul ; you deprive me at this mo- ment, and perhaps forever, of the only consolation that heaven granted to the few remaining days I have to live, — how shall I say it ? You have filled all ; the past, the pre- sent, and the future present me nothing but pain, regrets, remorse. Ah ! mon ami, I see, I judge it all, yet I am drawn to you by an attraction, by a feeling which I abhor, but which has the power of a curse and a fatality. You do well not to consider me ; I have no right to require anything of you ; for my most ardent wish is that you were nothing to me. What would you say of the state of a most unhaj)py being who showed herself to you for the first time agitated, convulsed by feelings so diverse and contradictory ? You would pity her ; your heart would be stirred ; you would want to suc- cour, to comfort that unfortimate creature. Mon ami, it is I ; this sorrow, it is you who have caused it ; this soul of fire and pain is your creation (ah ! I still think you godlike), and you ought to repent of your work. When I took my pen I did not know one word of what I should say to yoil ; I meant only to tell you to come and dine to-morrow, Wednesday, at Mme. Geoffrin's. I meant to show you that you alone of all my friends oblige me to wait for what I earnestly desire, " Le Conn^table." It is mine ; I might have refused to give it to you, and now it is I who persecute you to return it. Ah ! mon Dieu ! neither cares, nor interest, nor attentions, nor any desire to please, — occasion ally a kindness that resembles pity ; and with it all, or ivith- 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. &5 out it all, I love you wildly. Pity me, but do not tell me so. Bring back my letters ; yes, do that. Three o'clock, 1774. It was not myself who answered you. If you love me it must have made you uneasy, and I shall be grieved to have caused you a pain I could have avoided. I was in a state of anguish, like the agony of death, preceded by a fit of tears which lasted four hours. No, never, never did my soul feel such despair. I have a sort of terror which bewilders my reason. I await Wednesday, and it seems to me that death itself is not sufficient remedy for the loss I fear ; it needs no courage to die, but it is awful to live. It is beyond my strength to think that, perhaps, the one 1 love, he who loved me, will hear me no more, will never come again to succour me. He views death with horror because the thought of me is added to it. He wrote me on the 10th, " I have in me that which will make you forget all that I have made you suffer ; " and that very day the fatal hemorrhage struck him down ! Ah ! mon Dieu ! you who have known passion, despair, can you conceive my soitow ? Pity me so long as I shall live, but never regi-et the unhappy being who has existed eight days in a state of suffering to which thought cannot attain. Adieu. If I must live, if my sentence is not pronounced, I may still find sweetness, charm, and consolation in your friendship ; will you preserve it for me ? 1774. I distrustful, and of you ! Think with what complete sur- render I have given myself to you ; not only have I put no distrust, no caution, into my conduct, but I should not even know regret or remorse if it were my happiness alone that I had compromised. Oh ! mon ami ! I know not if I now 96 LETTERS OF [1774 love better, but he who made me unfaithful and guilty, he for whom I live after losing the object and interest of every mo- ment of m}^ life, is he who has had most empire over my soul, he who has taken from me the liberty to live solely for an- other and to die when neither hope nor desire remains to me ! ^ No doubt I have been held to life by the same spell that drew me towards you, that potent charm attached to your pres- ence, which intoxicates my soul and bewilders it to such ex- cess that the memory of my sorrow is effaced. Mon ami, with three words you have created a new soul within me, you have filled it with an interest so keen, a sentiment so tender, so profound, that I lose the faculty to recall the past and to foresee the future. Yes, mon ami, I live in you ; I exist because I love you ; and that is so true that it seems to me impossible not to die if I should lose the hope of seeing you. The happiness of having seen you, the desire, the expectation of seeing you again aid and sustain me against my grief. Alas ! what would become of me if, instead of hope, I had only the sorrowful regret of not seeing you ? Mon ami, with you I have not been able to die, without you I neither could — nor would I — live. Ah ' if you knew what I suffer, what dreadful laceration my heart feels when I am left to myself, when your presence, or your thought no longer sustains me ! Ah ! it is then that the memory of M. de Mora becomes a senti- ment so active, so piercing, that my life, my feelmgs cause me horror. I abhor the aberration, the passion that made me guilty, that made me cast trouble and fear into that sensitive soul that was all my own. Mon ami, do you conceive to what point I love you ? You 1 The Marquis de Mora died at Bordeaux, May 27, 1774, on his way from Madrid to I'aris, drawn there by his passionate desire to return to Mile, de Lespinasse. — Fr. Ed. 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 97 divert the regrets, the remorse, that rend my heart : alas ! they would suffice to deliver me from a life I hate ; you alone and my sorrow remain to me in this wide world ; I have no more interest in it, no ties, no friends, and I need none : to love you, to see you, or to cease to exist — that is the last and only prayer of my soul. Yours does not respond to it, I know ; but I do not complain of that. By a strange caprice, which I feel but cannot explain, I am far from desiring to find in you that which I have lost : it would be too much ; what human being has better felt than I all the value of that life ? Is it not enough to have blessed and cherished that nature once ? How many thousands of men have crossed this earth without compare to him ! Oh ! how I have been loved ! A soul of fire, full of energy, which had judged all things, estimated all things, and then, turning away revolted by all, gave itself up to the need and joy of loving — mon ami, that is how I was loved. Several years went by, filled with the charm and the sorrows inseparable from a passion as strong as it was deep, and then you came to pour poison into my heart, to ravage my soul with trouble and remorse. My God ! what have you not made me suffer ! You tore me from my feeling, but I saw you were not mine. Do you not see the wliole horror of that situation ? How is it that I have lived through such woe ? How can one still find gentleness to say : " Mon ami, I love you, and with such trath and tenderness that it is not possible your soul be cold as it hears me " ? Adieu. Friday, after post time. You are " displeased ; " see if you ought to be ; what soul have you ever inspired with a stronger or more tender feel- ing ? Mon ami, in whatever way you regard and judge my soul, I defy you to find anythicg in it to displease you. Oh ! 7 98 LETTERS OF [1774 I am sure of it ; never have you been so loved. But do not make me say why — I cannot write to you ivhere you are ; I dare not acknowledge to myself tlie reason ; it is a thought, an emotion, on which I do not wish to dwell ; it is a sort of torture which horrifies me, which humiliates me, and one which I have never yet known. You ask me how I liked the habit of seeing you daily. Oh, no ! it was not a habit ; it never could become one. How cold such colours are, how monotonous ! they cannot be compared with the violent and rayjid emotions which the- name and presence of the one we love excite. No, no, I have not been happy enough to give myself the illusion that you would come and see me ; thus I did not hear the opening and closing of my door. But without interests, without desires, what matters it what people see or hear ? Given over to my regrets, I feel but one need ; I implore either you or death. You soothe my soul, you fill it with so tender a sentiment that it is sweet to live during the time that I see you ; but there is nought but death that can deliver me from misery in your absence. Midnight, 1774. So you have forgotten, abandoned, that fury, so foolish and so wicked both ! but had yon left her in hell itself she would not complain; the heat and activity of that abode would make her live. Instead of that, the unhappy creature spent her day in purgatory; she awaited a consoling angel who did not come. He was no doubt making the happiness and joy of some celestial being, himself intoxicated with the joys of heaven. In that condition what could recall me to him ; and if in truth he is really happy, I desire, from the bottom of my soul, that nothing may remind him of me ; for I am sufficiently unjust to detest his happiness and to wish that remorse and repentance may pursue him perpetually. 1774] MLLE. DE LESPlNASSE. 99 I wish him worse still, namely : that he may love no more, and that he may henceforth inspire indifference only. Those are the prayers, that is the wish of the soul that has loved him best and has the greatest need of extinction forever. 1774. I am alone at this moment and I wish to tell you at once that I do not coimt upon you to go to the Duchesse d'An- ville's. You will be always agreeable to me, but seldom useful, and I wish I could add, little necessary. In trying to restore my confidence, you prove to me how justly my dis- trust was founded ; for I still miss three letters, one, espe- cially, in which I spoke to you of Gonsalve [M. de Mora]. You will doubtless find those three letters in some pocket of your portfolio ; perhaps they are with that fourth volume that I ought to receive to-day. I notice that you make it your pleasure to pay attentions to Mme. de . . . ; you give, and lend her, whatever gives you pleasure; to me, it is the opposite extreme, — negligence, forgetfulness, refusal. It is three months since you promised me a book which belongs to you; I have now borrowed it from some one else. No doubt it is best that this dis- obliging maimer should fall on me ; that is only right, and I complain solely of the excess of it. Good-night ! If work costs you your nights, you must regret veiy much the use- less visits that fill your days. Among the letters you have sent back to me one is not mine ; but I swear that I will never return it to you. 1774. Return to me the two old letters. I am not asking you for those of Cicero or Pliny. I desire not to see you, never to see you again. Eegret is better — is it not ? — than remorse. At the moment when you receive this I will wager that 100 LETl^ERS OF [1774 you have already received a note in which you were told ... I don't know what. Eh ! mon Dieu ! believe her, give her peace, and if it is possible, be happy yourself: that is the wish, that is the prayer of the unhappy woman who has always before her eyes the dreadful inscription on the portal of liell : " Give up all hope, ye who enter liere." I have no hope, and I wish for none. I ought to have annihilated myself on the day I was left solitary. You prevented it, and you cannot now console me. May 11, 1774. You do not know me yet ; it is almost impossible to wound my self-love ; and the heart is so indulgent ! In fact, the party of last night was like those insipid novels which make the author and the readers yawn together. However, one must say with the King of Prussia, on a rather more memorable occasion, " We will do better next time." That which makes an epoch remains in the memory, and you will never forget in future that the day on which Louis XV. died you spent the evening at a party in a sound sleep. Believe me, there are recollections more painful than that. Good-bye. Eleven o'clock at night. 1774. I will wager that you are not as sleepy to-day as you were yesterday at the same hour ; and the reason is very simple ; you are being amused, interested, and you have the desire to please. Mon ami, you were not made for privacy ; you need expansion; movement and the hurly-burly of society is necessary to you ; this is not a need of your vanity ; it is that of your activity. Confidence, tenderness, forgetfulness of self and of vanity, all those blessings felt and appreciated by a tender and passionate soul, clog and extinguish yours. Yes, I repeat it : you have no need of being loved. What a 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 101 strange mistake was mine ' and / dare to blame certain per- sons for lack of discernment ! / dare to tell them that they observe nothing and do not know men. All ! how misled I was ; mistaken to excess ! How is it that my intelligence did not check my soul ? How can it be that, judging you incessantly, I was, nevertheless, always carried away ? You do not know the half of your ascendency over me ; you do not know what you have to conquer each time that I see you ; you have never suspected the sacrifices that I make to yoii ; you do not know the degree to which I renounce my own self in order to be yours. I say to you with Phfedre, " Often was I forced to deprive myself of tears." Yes, mo7i ami, I deprive myself, with you, of all that is most dear to me. I never speak to you now of my regrets, nor of my memories ; and, what is more cruel still, I let you see but a part of the feelings with which you fill my heart. I restrain the passion you excite in my soid. ; I say to myself incessantly : " He will not respond to it, he will not under- stand me, and I should die of pain." Can you conceive, mon ami, the species of torture to which I am condemned ? I have remorse for what I give you, and regrets for what I am forced to keep back. I give myself up to you, but I do not give myself up to my own feeling for you ; yielding to you, I nevertheless battle within myself. Ah ! can you under- stand me ? can you know through thought what I feel, and what you have made me suffer ? Yes, you will have a return towards me, because you have the sensibility that feels an interest in the mdiappy and pities them. But I know not why I thus unbosom myself for an in- stant; I know that I shall find no comfort in your heart. Mon ami, it is empty of tenderness and feeling. You have but one means of lifting me from my troubles : it is that of L!Bi and active need to be de- livered fioiii Miy ticuhlt's has sustained me and protects me still against the grief that your absence would make me feel. Do not conclude from this that 1 l. 8 114 LETTERS OF [1774 Eleven o'clock at night, 1774. I have no news of yoii ; 1 IiojkmI fur none, and yet I awaited some. Ah ' inoii Dim ! how can you say that pain is uo longer in n)y soul ? I fainted from it yesterday ; 1 had a crisis of despair which gave me convulsions that lasted four hours. Mon ami, if I must tell you what I lielieve, what is true, it is that I love y(ju to madness, to the ]"»iiit (jf Ijeliev- ing that T never loved hctter, Imt — 1 have need of your presence to luve }-ou ; all the rest (jf m\ life is s]>ent in remembering, in regretting, in weeping. Yes, go: tell me that you love another; I desire it, I wish it ; 1 have a wound so deep, so lacerating, that I can hope for no relief but that of death. The relief that you have given me is like the effect of opium ; it suspends my sorrow, but does not cure it ; on the contrary, 1 am feebler and more sensitive in consequence. You are right, I am no longer capable of love; I can only sufl'er. I did find hope in }ou, and I gave myself up to it ; 1 thought that the pleasure of loving you would calm my sorrow, Alas 1 in vain do I flee it ; it recalls me incessantly ; it compels me ; it leaves me but one resource. Ah ! do not speak to me of that which I find in society ; society has become to me an intolerable re- straint ; and if I could induce M. d'Alembert not to live with me, my door would be closed. How can you suppose that the productions of the mind would have more empire over me than the charm, the consolation of friendship ? I" have the most worthy friends, the most feeling, the most virtuous. Each, in his own way and according to his ovm tone, would faia reach my soul ; I am filled with a sense of so much kindness but — I remain unhappy: you alone, mon ami, have the power to make me know happiness. Alas ! it holds me to life while invoking death ! But why have you set such value on being loved by me ? 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 115 You had no need of it ; you knew well that you could not return it. Have you played with my despair ? Either fill my soul, or torture it no longer ; act so that I may love you always, or that I may never love you ; in short, do the im- possible, — calm me, or I die. At this moment what are you doing ? You are bringing trouble into a soul that time was calming ; you abandon me to my sorrow. Ah ! if you had feeling, you would be to be pitied, mon ami, }ou would know remorse. But at least, if your heart cannot fix itself, devote yourself to your talent, occupy yourself, work to some purpose ; for if you continue this desultory, restless life, I fear you will some day be re- duced to say, — "The desire for fame has worn out my soul." Saturday, in the evening. It was not mitil tliis morning that I received news of you, and I do not know whence or how it came ; certainly not by the post. Believe me crazy if you choose, think me unjust, in short, what you please ; but it will not ja-eveut me from telling you that I tliink I never in my life received so sharp, so blasting an impression as that your letter made upon me. I felt crushed by having ever given to any one the right to say to me what I was reading; and to say it with such ease and so naturally that I must conclude the writer was simply pouring out his soul in s|)eaking to me, without one thouglit that he insulteil me. Oil ! how well you have avenged ]\I. de Mora ! How cruelly you punish me for the delirium, the distraction that dragged me towards you ! How I detest them! I will enter into no details ; you have neither enough kind- ness nor enough feeling to allow my soul to lower itself to complaint ; my heart, my self-love, all that inspires me, 116 LETTERS OF [1774 all that makes me feel, think, breathe, in a word, all that is I, is shocked, wounded, and offended forever. You have restored to me enough strength, not to endure my son-ow (it seems to me gi-eater and more crushing than ever), but to se- cure myself from ever again being tortured and made unhappy by you. Judge of the excess of my crime and the greatness of my loss. I feel, sorrow does not deceive me, that if M. de Mora were living and could have read your letter he would forgive me, he would console me, and hate 3"0u. Ah ! mon Dieu ! leave me my regrets ; they are a thousand times more dear to me than what you call your sentiment ; that is dreadful to me ; its expression is contemptuous, and my soul repels it with such horror that that alone assures me my soul is worthy of virtue. Were you even to think that you have done justly by me, I prefer to leave you in that opinion rather than enter upon any explanation. The matter is ended ; be with me as you can, as you please ; for myself, in future (if there is a future for me) I shall be with you as I ought always to have been, and, if you leave no remorse within my soul, I hope to forget you. I feel that the wounds of self-love chill the soul. I do not know why I have let you read what I wrote you before I received your letter ; you will see there all my weakness ; but you will not see all my misfortune : I hoped nothing more from you ; I did not seek to be consoled. Then why should I complain ? Ah, why ! because the patient doomed to death continues to expect his doctor ; because he lifts his eyes to his, still seeking hope; because the last impulse of pain is a moan, the last accent of the soul is a cry : that is the explanation of my inconsistency, my folly, my weakness. Oh ! I am punished ! 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 117 Eleven o'clock, 1774. Have the delicacy to cease persecuting me. I have but one wish, I have but one need : it is not to see you again in private. I can do nothing for your happiness, I know nothing with which to console you : leave me therefore, and do not any longer take pleasure in torturing my life. I make you no reproaches ; you suffer, I pity you, and I shall not speak to you again of my sorrows. But in the name of that which still has some empire over your soul, in the name of hon- our, in the name of virtue, leave me, and count no longer upon me. If I can calm myself, I shall live ; but if you con- tinue to act as you do, you will soon reduce me to the strength of despair : spare me the grief and the embaiTassment of order- ing my door to be closed to you during the hours when I am alone. I request you, and for the last time, not to come to me except between five o'clock and nine. If Mme. de . . . could read my soid, I assure you she would not hate me ; at the most, I have put a few regrets into hers : but you and she have made me feel the tortures of the damned, repentance, hatred, jealousy, remorse, con- tempt of myself, and sometimes of you — m short, all the misery of passion, but never that which makes the hap- piness of an honourable and sensitive soul. This is what I owe to you : but I forgive you. If I clung to life I should not be so generous ; I should vow to you an implacable ha- tred. But soon I shall no more cling to you than I do to life, and I wish to employ my soul, my sensibility, all that remains to me of existence in loving, adoring the only being who ever truly filled my soul, and to whom I owe more happiness and pleasure than almost any one who ever walked this earth has felt or could imagine — and it is you who made me guilty towards that man ! that thought sickens my soul ; I turn away from it. I wish to calm myself, and. 118 LETTERS OF [1774 if 1 can, to die. I repeat to you, and it is the last cry of my soul to you : in pity, leave nie ; if not, you will know remorse. 1774. Mon Dicu ! how you trouble my life ! you make me pa.ss through in one day the most c(mtrary conditions ; sometimes I am carried away by passionate emotion ; then I turn to ice at the tliought that you will not respond to me. Then this last reflectitm makes me angry with my own nature, and to recover a little calmness, 1 abandon myself to the heart- rending memory of him whom I have lost. Presently my soul is filled with gentler feeling ; I am in a state to dwell on the few moments of happiness that I have tasted in loving. All these thoughts, which ought to take me farther from you, bring me closer. I feel that I love you, and so much that I can have no hope of repose except in death. That is my only support, the only help that I expect, the need of which I feel in almost all the moments of my life. Mon ami, you have shed a balm on the little wound I gave myself last night; this proves the truth of what M. d'Alembert asserts, that there are circumstances in which pain is not pain. Yes, you shall have the Eulogy before midnight. I have sent to the Archbishop of Toulouse [Lom^nie de Brieime] to return it. Adieu, once more, mon ami; you cause my silence, my sadness, my unliap- piness ; in a word, it is you who give life to my soul, and my soul drags me onward. I dare not tell you to what point I love you. Ten o'clock, 1774. You do not care to see me again to-day ; you are sufficiently indifferent to me, so that I need not fear to disturb the interests that are agitating you. Listen to me, and let us make a com- pact with each other, such as Mme, de Montespan proposed 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 119 to Mme. de Maintenon. Being forced to take a rather long journey with her tete a tete, "Madame," she said, "let us forget our hatred, our quarrels, and be good company to one another," Well ! I say to you : " Let us forget our mutual dis- pleasure, and do you be docile enough to bring back to me what I asked you for." Yes, it is I who am speaking to you, and I am not mad ; at any rate, my madness is of a kind less harsh and more unhappy. August 25, 1774. Yes, mon ami, that which has most force, most power in nature, is assuredly passion; it has just imposed upon me privation, and it enables me to bear it with a thousand-fold more courage than reason or virtue could inspire. But pas- sion is an absolute tyrant ; a tyrant that makes slaves of those only who hate and treasure, by turns, their chain, and never have strength to break it. It commands me to-day to pursue a conduct absolutely the contrary to that I have prescribed to myself for the last two weeks. I see my own inconsistency ; I am ashamed of it, but I yield to the need of mv heart. I tind a sweetness in being weak, and though you may abuse it, mon ami, I will love you, and will say it to you sometimes with pleasure, oftener with pain when I think you will not respond to it. Listen to all I have suffered since you left me. An hour after your departure, I learned that you had hidden from me that Mme. de . . . had started the night before. Then I believed you had delayed your departure on her account. I judged you with a passion the true character of which is never to see things as they are. I saw and believed all that could distress nde most : — I was deceived ; you were guilty, you had come to bid me adieu in the very act of abusing my tenderness. That thought roused my soul to indignation, it irritated my self-love; I felt myself at the summit of un- 120 LETTERS OF [1774 happiness; I could love you no longer; I abhorred the mo- ments of pleasure and consolation which I owed to you. You had snatched me from death, tlie sole resource, the sole sup- port which 1 had promised myself when I trembled for tlie life of M. de Mora. You made me survive that dreadful moment; you iilled my soul with remorse, and you made me experience a greater misfortime still — that of hating you ; yes, vion ami, hating y(m. For eight days I was filled by that horrible sentiment, although during that time I received your letter from Chartres. The need of kn(»wiug how you were in health made me break a resolution I had formed to open no more of your letters. You told me that you were well ; you informed me that, in spite of my request, you had taken some of my letters, and }()U quoted a verse from " Zaire," which seemed to sneer at my unhappiness ; and then — what hurt me most of all — the regrets expressed in the letter seemed vague, and more fitted to relieve your soul than to touch mine. In a word, I made poison of all you said to me, and more than ever I resolved not to love you, and to open no more of your letters. I kept that reso- lution, which rent my heart and made me ill. Since your departure I am changed and shrunken as if I had had a great illness. Ah ! this fever of the soul, which rises to delirium, is indeed a cruel illness; there is no bodily frame robust enough to bear such suffering. Mon ami, pity me ; you have done me harm. I received your letter from Eochambeau only on Saturday. I did not open it, and as I put it away in my portfolio, my heart beat ^dolently : but I commanded myself to be strong, and I was. Ah ! how much it cost me to keep that letter unopened ! how many times I read the address ! how often I held it in my hands ! at night, even, T felt the need of touch- ing it. In the excess of my weakness I told myself I was 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 121 strong, that I resisted my greatest pleasure, and — see my sort of madness ! — I loved you then more actively than ever. Nothing, for six days, could distract my mind from that sealed letter ; if I had opened it the moment I received it, its impression could not have been so sharp nor so profoimd. At last, at last, yesterday, receiving no letters from Chante- loup, from which place you had promised to write to me, I was struck with the thought that you might be HI at Eochambeau, and, without knowing what I was doing, nor to what I yielded, your letter was read, re-read, wetted with my tears, before 1 thought that I was not to read it. Ah ! moil ami, how much I might have lost ! I adore your sensibility. "Wliat you tell me of Bordeaux opened a wound that is not yet closed, and never will be.^ No, my life wUl not be long enough to mourn and cherish the memory of the most sensi- tive, most virtuous man who ever existed. What an awful thouglit ! I troubled his last days. Fearing to have to com- plain of me he exjxjsed his life to come to me, and his last impulse was an action of tenderness and passion. I do not know if I shall ever recover strength to read again his last words. If I had not loved you, mon ami, they would have killed me. 1 shudder still ; I see them ; and it is you who made me guilty ; it is you who made me live ; it is you who brought trouble into my soul ; it is you that I love, that I hate, you who rend and charm a heart that is wholly yotirs. Mon ami, do not fear to be sad with me ; that is my tone ; sadness is my existence ; you alone — yes, you alone have the power to change my disposition ; your presence leaves me neither memories nor pain. I have experienced that you can divert even my physical sufferings. I love you, and all my faculties are employed and spell-bound when I see you. 1 M. de Mora died at Bordeaux. — Tr. 122 LETTERS OF [1774 Friday morning, August 26, 1774. Mon ami. I was interrupted yesterday. There is so much news, so much going and coming, such j(jy, that one hardly knows whom to listen to. 1 should like to be glad, but that is impossible. A few months ago I should have been trans- ported at both the good to be hoped and tlie evil from which we are delivered ; at the present moment I am glad only by thought, and by reflection of the tone of all I see and all I hear. You know that M. Turgot.is made controller- general [in place of tlie Abb^ Terrai], — he enters the Council; M. dAngevilliers has the department of buildings; M. de Miromesnil is Keeper of the Seals ; the chancellor is exiled to Normandy ; M. de Sartine has the navy, but they say it is only wliile awaiting the department of M. de la VriQifere; M. Lenoir is lieutenant of police ; M. de Fitz-James does not go to Bretagne ; it is the Due de Penthifevre who is to hold the State Assembly with M. de Fourgueux — But I am really as piipiante as M. Alarm, from whom they have taken the Gazette to give it to an Abb^ Aumont, because he told old news. Not to return to this matter I must add that the Baron de Breteuil goes to Vienna, and M. de la Yauguyon to Naples. Now let us pass to social news. Yesterday M. d'Alem- bert had the greatest success at the Academy. I was not a witness of it, being too ill ; I had only strength to sit .in my usual chair. He read his Eulog)^ on Despreaux [Boileau] and some anecdotes about Fenelon, which they say were delightful. I would not listen to them this week, having my head full of that letter I did not open. One needs calm- ness to listen ; consequently, I listen very little. Mon ami, they are printing a life of Catinat: the author is a M. Turpin, who did the " Life of the Great Conde." M. d'Alembert has read it, and from what he says I judge it will take neither 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 123 the piquancy nor the merit from your " Eulogy of Catinat ; " as soon as it appears I will send it to you. I have seen a great deal of Mme. de Boufflers since your departure, and I shall either humble or exalt your vanity by telling you that she never once named you. If that is natural, it is very cold ; if there is a plan, it is very warm. We spent an evening with her, we went to the fair together, she came to see me, and we are all going to the catafalque. But for my benefit alone are some excellent pine-apples which she has sent me, and a letter of four pages on public affairs, on the glory with which the Prince de Conti has covered himself, and on her step-daughter, — not to speak of very flattering praises for me. I shall make you die of jealousy some day when I read it to you ; but before then you will coquet and please and fascinate so many that my successes will seem nothing. But, mon ami, why did you not write me from Chanteloup ? ^ have you already nothing to say to me ? The post leaves every day, and if it did not, what matter ? the letter would be in tlie post, and you need not be a century deprived of the pleasure of talking with one who loves you : remark that I dare not say " one whom you love." If you arrive Tuesday after the courier from Bor- deaux, I shall have to wait till Wednesday, and that is hold- ing me in purgatory after keeping me for fifteen days in hell. If you receive this letter in Bordeaux, as I do not doubt you will, I retract and will ask you to go and see that con- sul : perhaps I shall thus obtain more details. He will tell you of the most lovable, most interesting of beings, whom I ought to have loved solely, whom I should never have injured if, by a fatality I detest, I had not been unable to escape a ^ Where M. de Guihert often went, as was then the fashion, to visit the Due de Choiseul in his popular exile to his country-seat of that name. — Fb. Ed, 124 LETTERS OF [1774 new form of evil — for there is little that I have not experi- enced. Some day, rtion ami, I will tell you things that are not to be found in the novels of Prc^vost or Kichardson. My history is made up of fatal circumstances which prove to me that the true is often the most unlikely. The heroines of novels have little to say about their education; mine deserves to be written down for its singularity. Some even- ing, next winter, when we are very sad and inclined to reflec- tion, I will give you the pastime of listening to a written paper which would interest you if you foimd it in a book, though it will inspire you with a great horror of the human species. Ah ! how cruel mankind are ! tigers are kind compared with them. I ought naturally to devote myself to hating; I have ill-fultilled my destiny; I have loved much and hated little. Mon Dieu !■ mon ami, I am a hundred years old; this life of mine which looks to be so uniform, so monotonous, has been a prey to all misfortunes, exposed to all the villanous passions which stir the un- worthy — but where am I wandering ? wholly given to you whom I love, who sustain and defend my life, why do I cast my eyes on objects which made me detest it ? Saturday, August 27, 1774. Mon ami, I have no news of you. I said to myself a hundred times : " He must have arrived very late ; he would not think of the value of a single hour to me." That makes a difference of four days ; I am now postponed till Wednesday ! Well ! the pains I have taken not to let my soul rest on that hope have served for nothing. The courier has arrived ; I received three letters ; but I could not read them because yours was missmg. Mon Dieu ! you are neither happy enough nor unhappy enough to experience that feel- ing. Mon ami, if I do not hear from you next Wednesday, 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 125 I will not wi'ite to you again. You have done me one wrong, but if you do me a thousand more, I here declare to you that I will not forgive you, and that I shall not love you less. You see that I am talking to you of the impossible : the logic of the heart is absurd. In God's name, act so that I shall never reason more wisely. How much you are missed at this moment ! the excite- ment is general, mon ami. There is this difference between my state of mind and that of all the persons I see : they are transported with joy at the happiness they foretell, while I only breathe the freer for our deliverance from evil. Mon Dieu ! my soul cannot rise to joy ; it is filled with regrets and heart-breaking memories ; it is stiiTed by a sentiment that troubles it ; that often gives it ^^iolent emotions, but very rarely any pleasure. In such a state, public joy is only felt by thought and reflection ; reasonable pleasures are so moderate ' my friends are displeased that they cannot drag me into enthusiasm. " I am very sorry," I say to them, " but I have no longer the strength to be glad." Nevertheless, I am very pleased that M. Turgot has already dismissed a scoundrel, the man of the wheat affah [treasurer of the king's granaries]. I must tell you of a compliment the fish- women paid to the king [Louis XVI.] on his fete-day : " Sire, we have come to compliment Your Majesty on the hvnt you had yesterday ; never did yuui grandfather have a better." The Comte de C . . . , who is at Martigny with M. de Trudaiue, has written me three pages full of enthusi- asm and transport. How happy they are ! hope keeps them young. Alas ! how old one feels when one has lost it, when nothing remains but to escape despair ' Tell me if you are writing many verses ; if you are getting a habit of making haste sloivly, if you have resolved to do like Racine, who wrote poetry reluctantly. Mon ami, I impose 126 LETTERS OF [1774 upon you the pleasure of reading, and re-reading every morn- ing a scene of that divine iiuisic; then you must walk about, and tlien compose verses, and with the talent that nature has given you to think and feel strongly, I will answer for it that you will make very noble ones. But what am I doing ? Advising a man wlio has a great contempt for my taste, who thinks me a fool, wlio has never seen me sensible about any- thing, and who, judging me thus, may perhaps be sensible himself and show as nnich accuracy as justice. Adieu, mon ami. If you loved me I should not be so modest; I should feel I had nothing in all nature to envy. ■ I wrote you a volume yesterday to Bordeaux. That name is dreadful to me ; it touches the sensitive and painful nerve of my soul. Adieu, adieu. Monday, August 29, 1774. You know that M. Turgot is controller-general, but what you do not know is the conversation he had with the king on the subject. He had shown some reluctance to accept the office when M. de Maurepas offered it to him on behalf of His Majesty. The king said to him, " So you do not wish to be controller-general?" "Sire," replied M. Turgot, "I must admit to Your Majesty that I should have preferred to keep the ministry of the navy, because it is a safer office and I could be more certain of doing well in it ; but at such a moment as this it is not to the king I give myself, it is to the honest man." The king took both his hands, and said, " You shall not be mistaken." M. Turgot added : " Su-e, I must represent to Y. M. the necessity of economy, of which Y. M. ought to set the first example ; the Abbd Terrai has no doubt already said this to Your Majesty." "Yes," replied the king, "he has said it, but he has never said it in the way that you have." All this is just as if you had heard it, for M. Turgot never adds a word to the truth. This emo- 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 127 tion of the soul of the king gives great hope to M. Turgot, and I think that you will have as much as he. M. de Yaines is given the place of M. Leclerc [head-clerk of the Treasury] ; but there will be no luxiny, no show, no valet de chambre, no audience, in a word, the gi-eatest simplicity, that is to say, the style of M. Turgot. Yes, I assure you, you are much missed here ; you would have shared the trans- ports of the universal joy. People begin to feel the need of silence to compose themselves and let them think of all the good they expect. The personal interests remain, which must always be counted for something. The Chevalier d'Aguesseau has just gratified and shocked my heart at one and the same time; he knows that you were twenty-four hours at Chanteloup, that you are quite well, and that you reached Bordeaux on the 2 2d. After that, it was natural that your friends should hear from you on Saturday, 27th. I do not complain of the preference that you have given them ; but, mon ami, it would be sweet to be able to congratulate myself and to thank you for an atten- tion I should have felt so much and of which my soul had need. Adieu ; here are three letters in a very short time. If I do not have one from you on Wednesday 1 believe that I shall be able to keep silence. All my friends ask news of you with mterest, especially M. d'Alembert. I think I have not told you of the success of the Chevalier de Chastellux m a trip of four days which he has just made to Villers-Cotterets [country-seat of the Due d'Orl^ans]. He gave six readings there, though he had but four plays with him ; he read two of them twice. He thinks that " Les Pretentions " was not much liked ; I scolded the Archbishop of Toulouse, who was present, for this. If you knew how be justified himself you would die of laughmg. The chevalier related his successes to me with much naivete. I rejoiced ; 128 LETTERS OF [1774 but I am sorry to see him looking ill ; I am afraid his health is seriously threatened. M. Watelet is quite ill with a chest affection ; he is taking asses' milk. I am very ]X)orly the last few days, but that is almost my hal)itual condition ; the duration of my trouble takes from me even the consola- tion of complauiing of it. Adieu again. Did 1 nt knnw why it liroiight such terror into my soul. Ah! if I could buy hack his life for a single hour there is no pain 1 should not have the strength to bear; 1 should say with Zulime : — " Dk'iitli aiitl Ik'11 a])])ear liefure me : Kaiiiiie ! with tianspoit I desci'iid there for thee." But, mon ami, I did not mean to say to you all this. I am confused ; 1 cannot continue. Adieu. iSaturday, midnight. First of all, I must tell you that your ink is white as paper, and to-day it has reall>- i>ut me out of patience. I had or- dered your letter to be brought to me at M. Turgot's, where I was dining with twenty persons. It was given to me while at table ; on one side I had the Archbishop of Aix,^ on the other, that inquisitive Abb^ Morellet. I opened my letter under the table ; I could scarcely see that any black was on the white, and the abbd made the same remark. Mme. de Boutilers, who was on the other side of the Archbishop of Aix, asked what I was reading. " Remem- ber where we are, and you will know what it is." — "A memorial, no doubt, for M. Turgot ? " — " Yes, just so, ma- dame, and I wi.sh to read it over before I give it to him." 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 153 Before returning to the salon I had read the letter through, and I am now going to reply to it — though I must do it hastily, for I am very tued with the great exertions that I made to-day. I have seen at least a hundred per- sons, and as your letter had done good to my soul, I talked, I forgot I was dead, and I have really extinguished myself. The truth is I had a " great success " because I brought out the charms and the intellects of the persons with whom I was; and it is to you, moii ami, that they owe that pastime, so sweet to their self-love. As for mine, it is not intoxicated by your praises ; I reply to y«»u, like Couci : " Love me, my prince, and praise me not." Mon ami, keep youi-self from ever again having the kind- ness to set forth my blessings and display my gifts ; never ilid I feel myself so poor, so ruined, so poverty-stricken; in estimating what I have, in making me see my resources, you only sliKW me that all is lost, (^ne means alone remains to me, — I have long foreboded it, I even think it a necessity, — namely, to make total bankruptcy ; but I postpone, I delay, T rock myself with hopes, with chimeras; I know them to be such, and yet they sustain me a little — but you destroy all by the horrible enumeration that you make of them. Ah ! what a deplorable inventory ! if any other than you had attemjtted to console me, to reconcile me to life l)y these hoi»eless consolations, I should say to him, like Agnes, " Horace, with two words, could do more than you " — but it is Horace who speaks to me ! Oh ! mon ami, my soul is sinking. Wliat more will you invent to torture me ? I shall be, you say, sustained, guaranteed, defended, etc. Well ! never have I been all that ; if you set your friendship at tliat value, I ask none of it. I have ])een weak, incon- sistent, inihappy, very unliappy ; I have feared for you ; I have wandered in the wilderness ; I have done wrong, no 154 LETTERS OF [1774 doubt ; and it is one harm the more to dwell upon it. I have not an impulse, I never say a word to you, that does not cause me regret or repentance. Mon ami, I ought to hate you. Alas ! it is long since I have done 'what I ought, what I wish ! I hate myself, I condemn myself, and I love you. Sunday evening, October 9, 1774. Mon ami, I have read your letter twice ; and the total impression that I receive from it is that you are very amiable, and that it is much easier not to love you at all than to love you moderately. Make the commentary on that, but not with your mind ; it is not to your mind that I speak. Mon ami, if I chose, I could dwell on certain words in your letter which have done me harm. You speak of my courage, my resources, the employment of my time, and of that of my soul in a manner to make me die of shame and regret for having suffered you to see my weakness. Ah, well ! it was in my soul, of which no impulse can be hidden from you. When it was moved by hatred, I let you see it ; but was hatred all that I allowed myself to feel ? 3Ion am/i, on reading again the recapitulation that you make of all there is on earth to keep me from destruction, I ended by laughing over it because it reminded me of a saying of President Renault, which is good. At a certain period of his life he thought that, in order to add to the esteem in which he was held, it would be well to become devout ; he made a general confession, and afterwards wTote to his friend M. d'Argenson, " Never do we feel so rich as when we move our belongings [qve lorsqu'on demcnagc]." I shall dine to-morrow with the Duchesse d'Anville. I like that house ; it is one the more where I can see you ; you live for what you love and for the gay world every evening ; but will you not often dine where I do ? That 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 155 will bring you into the society of those persons who are the most on your own tone. Fools and stupid people are never afoot before five or six o'clock ; that is the time when I return to my chimney corner, where I nearly always find, if not what I should have chosen, at any rate nothing that I wish to avoid. How is it that I have never yet told you that I am urged, entreated, to go and re-establish my health in England at the house of Lord Shelburue [Marquis of Lansdowne] ? He is a man of intellect, the leader of the Opposition ; he was the friend of Sterne, and adores his works. See what an attrac- tion he must have for me, and whether I am not much tempted by his obliging invitation. Admit that if you had known of this piece of good fortime you would not have omitted it from my pompuus inventor ij. Yes, M. de Condorcet is with his mother; he works ten hours a day. He has a score of correspondents, intimate friends ; and each, without fatuity, may think himself his first object ; never, never did any man have more existence, greater means, so much felicity. I just remember that you have never said a word to me about the Due de Choiseul ; is it because your stay at Chanteloup has left no traces on your journey ? Well ! here is how he stands in Paris : the public takes no notice of him ; it seems to me that the best thing for him at present is to remain in that state of oblivion, for he will gain nothing now by comparisons. We might have owed M. Turgot to him ten years ago, but he preferred to choose such ministers as Laverdy, Maupeou, Terrai, and others. Your letter to M. d'Alembert is excellent ; and as we are very communicative we gave it this evening to M. de Yaines, who was charmed with it, and desires to show it to him who could enjoy it without its alarming his modesty. . You will 156 LETTERS OF [1774 never guess what occupies my mind, what I desire to do ; to marry one. of my friends. I want an idea that has come to me to succeed ; the Archbishop of Toulouse could be very helpful to the success of the affair. The young lady is six- teen years old and has only a mother, no father, and a brother. They will give her, on marrying, thirteen thousand francs a year ; her mother will lodge her, and do so for a long time, because the son is a child. This girl caimot have less eventually than six hundred thousand francs, and she may be much richer : will that suit you, man ami .? Say so, and we will act ; it can ] )e done without offence, because the Archbishop of Toulouse has as much skill as courtesy. Let us talk it over ; and if this plan does not succeed I know a man who would be very glad to have you for a son-in-law ; l)ut his daughter is only eleven years old ; she is an only child and will be very rich. Man ami, what I desire above all things is your happiness ; and the means of procuring it for you will become the chief interest of my life. There was a time when my soul would have been less generous ; but then it responded to one who would have rejected with horror the empire of the world. What a memor}' ! how sweet, how cruel ! Good-night ; if I receive, as I hope, a letter fi'om you to-morrow I will add to this volume. For the last two days I have suffered less. I have reached the stage of two chicken-wings a day, and if that regimen does not suc- ceed better than the others, I shall put myself on a milk diet. Still Sunday, October 9. That adieu was very sudden, very abrupt, and you will readily imderstand. that I have a thousand other things to say to you ; for, if I am not mistaken, this is the last letter I shall write to you. As to this, I shall know to-morrow. You tell me that you are going to your regiment ; you have twice 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 157 written to me the name of the place where it is stationed, but, thanks to the beauty of your writing, I do not know what it is. I seem to make out Livourne, but that, surely, cannot be where you are going [it was Libourne, a new garrison of the Corsican Legion] . Mon ami, write me from wherever you stop ; you must compensate me for the priva- tion of not wi'iting to you. I do not feel certain that you have started as yet. How could you refuse your mother, — above all, if she is not convalescent ? she must be ill if she still has fever. How I hope you are not mistaken and that I shall really see you in two weeks. Fifteen days ! that is a long way off ; once I looked for a nearer coming — Ah ! I shudder ! what a dreadful recollection ! it poisons hope. Ah ! mon Dieu ! it was 3'ou who troubled and overthrew the hap- piness of that tender and impassioned soul ; it was you who condemned us to an awfid. misfortune, and — it is you I love ! Yes, we hate the evil that we do, but we are drawn to it. Without your consolation I should have died of grief, and now I am fated to live, to languish, to moan, to fear you, to love 3-ou, to curse life and to cherish it at some moments. . . . Here I was interrupted ; persons came and proposed to me to go and see Duplessis. He is a portrait-painter who will stand beside Van Dyck. I do not know if you have seen the portrait of the Abb^ Armaud painted by him ; but, my friend, you must certainly see that of Gluck ; it has a degi'ee of truth and perfection which is better and gi-eater than nature. He has put ten heads into it, all of different char- acters ; I have never seen anything finer or truer in that respect. ]\I. d'Argental came there, and showed us a letter he had just received from M. de Yoltaii'e ; I thought it so good, the tone so natural, it brought him so near to us, that, without thinking whether it were discreet or not, I asked for the letter ; I asked for a copy ; they are now making it, and 158 l?:tters of [k74 'nion ami shall read it — that thought is at the bottom of everything. Mon ami, 1 iiiiist repeat myself and say, as Sterne to liis Eliza, " Your pleasure is tlie first need of my heart." Mon Dieu ! how difficult it is to begin a letter when one has to make sentiment with one's mind, liut 1 must write to Mme. de Bouffiers. She has not once mentioned your name to me ; I am not sorry ; but how is it that persons do not seize every occasion to talk of that which pleases them ? There is, of course, a certain degree of affection that hinders ; it is that which prevents me from speaking to her of you, but she has never felt any such embarrassment, I am sure ; she has nothing to do with loving, — she is too charming ! Mon ami, I know myself so well that 1 am tempted to think you are laughing at me when you speak of my suc- cesses in society. It is eight years since I retired from the world ; from the moment that I loved I felt a di.sgust for such successes. What need have we of pleasing when we are beloved ? Is there one emotion, one desire left that has not for its object the person whom we love and for whom we desire to live exclusively ? Mon ami, you have no such desire, have you ? Friclay, October 14, 1774. Mon ami, I have just returned from hearing the " Orpheus ; " it has soothed, it has calmed my soul. I wept, but my tears had no bitterness ; my sorrow was gentle, my regrets were mingled with memories of you, and my thoughts rested on them without remorse. I wept for what I had lost, and I loved you ; my heart was able for both. Oh ! what a charming art ! what a divine art ! Music was invented by a sensitive being who desired to console the unhappy. "What lieneficent balm in those enchanting sounds ! Mon ami, for incurable sorrows we should take anodynes 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 159 only; and there are but three in all the world to soothe my heart : you first, mon ami, you, the most efficacious of all, you who lift me from my sorrow, who fill my soul with a sort of intoxication that takes from me the faculty of remembering and foreseeing. After this first of all bless- ing, which I treasure as the support and the resource of my despair, comes opium ; it is not dear to me in itself, but it is necessar}'. And lastly, that which is agreeable to me, which charms away my griefs, is music. Music pours into my blood, into all that animates me, a sweetness, a sensibility so delightful that I may almost say it turns to joy my regrets and my misfortunes ; and that is so true that in the happiest period of my life music was not to me then of the value it is now. 3Ion ami, before you went away I did not go to " Orpheus ; '■" I did not feel the need of it ; I saw, or I had seen you, or I expected you ; that filled all ; but since your absence, in the void about me, in the many and various crises of despair which have shaken and convulsed my soul, I have called all resources to my aid. How feeble they are ! how impotent against the poison that eats away my life ! But I must turn from myself and speak of you ; I ought not to have changed that topic. M. Turgot has written to you ; he has made amends, for he asks you to do him a service, and I feel very sure that you have thus felt it. M. de Vaines said to me yesterday : " Make M. de Guibert return ; he could enlighten us ; he would be useful to us about things of which we are ignorant and need information." — The Comte de C . . . was at the Opera to-night ; he came to see me in my box and talked much of his affairs. A gi-eat fortune is a gi-eat burden ; he has many lawsuits, and is incessantly occupied with a mass of objects from which he derives neither profit nor fame. Ah ! no, hap- piness is not in gieat riches. Where is it, then ? among a 160 'LETTERS OF [1774 few erudites, very dull and very solitary ; among good arti- sans, busy in a lucrative and not painful labour ; among good farmers with large and active families, who live in decent comfort. All the rest of the world swarms with fools, imbe- ciles, and madmen; in the latter class are the unliappy — among whom I do not include those in Charenton ; for the style of madness which makes a man suppose himself the Eternal Father may Ije Ijetter, perhaps, than wisdom or happiness. I send £Cn extract of a letter written to the Swedish am- bassador; you will observe with wliat elegance foreigners speak French ! 1 have not changed a comma. Everybody is at Fontainebleau, and I am glad of it ; I should often like to write over my door, as some learned man did over his, " Those who come to see me do me honour, those who do not come give me pleasure." M. de Marmontel proposed to me to come last Wednesday and read me his new comic opera. He came ; there were some twelve persons present. Behold us in a circle surrounding him, and listening to the " Vieux Gargon," — that was the name of the piece. The begin- ning of the first scene seemed to me muddled, confused. What do you think I then did, without my will having the slightest part in it ? I did not listen to a word ; and that is so true that if I were hanged for it, I could not have told the name of a personage or the subject of the play ; I got out of it by telling the truth, namely, that the time seemed to me very short. The fact is that, since I have been imable to fix my attention upon anything, I love readings dis- tractedly, because they leave me free ; whereas in conversa- tion we have to recall our thoughts. Mon ami, you may say what you please, but I do not like conversation unless it is you or the Chevalier de Chastellux who make it. Apropos, he is much pleased with me ; I have stirred up his friends, 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 161 and things are so well arranged that all we need to get him received into the Academy is the death of one of the forty. It is a proper thing, no doubt, but it was not done without difficulty ; the interest, the pleasure, the desire he put into this triumph spurred me on. Mon Dieu ! Fontenelle was right : there are rattles for all ages ; there is nought but sor- row too old for them, nought but passion too reasonable. Mon ami, those are not paradoxes ; think them over, and you will see they can be maintained. Good-night; it is time to let you breathe; I have written without pausing. Opera days are my times of retreat. I aui alone when I come home ; my door is closed. M. d'Alembert has been to see " Harlequin ; " he likes that better than " Orpheus." Every one has good reasons, and I am far from criticising tastes ; all are good. Adieu, till to-morrow. Saturday, three o'clock, after the postman. I dined at home to get my letter from you an hour earlier ; that replies to your last question. But, mon ami, you truly grieve me by not saying a word as to why you did not write to me by the last courier. You feel you did wrong, and you want to turn my mind away from it by promising to do better in future; you are very amiable, mon ami, and I thank you in advance. I dare not desire your return, but I count the days of your absence. Mon Dieu ! how slow they are ! how long they are ! how they weigh upon my soul ! how difficult, how impossible it is to distract one's self a moment from the soul's need ! Books, society, friendship, all imagi- nable resources serve only to make us feel more keenly the vahie and power of what we lack. I do not answer, but I am touched to the depths of my heart by what you say to me of M. de Mora. M. d'Alem- bert has written to M. de Fuentfes ; he wrote from his own 1fi2 LETTERS OF [1774 impulse; and in reading nie his letter he wept, and made me, too, burst into tears. Ah ! how tliat thought rends me ! Moil ami, I want to think now of you, and to justify the feeling that made me burn your letters. 1 did not think I should survive that sacrifice a day, and as I made it my blood, my heart were frozen with despaii", so that 1 did not fully feel the loss 1 had inflicted on myself for over six days. Ah ! twenty times, a hundred times 1 have grieved to have burned what you had written : nothing can repair that loss ; it is heart-breaking. Yes, M. Turgot is at work about the corvees. Good-bye, mon ami ; are you not weary of reading these scribblings ? Sunday evening, October 16, 1774. Mon ami, I did not answer your charming letter yesterday, and I shall never answer to my oion satisfaction what you say to me of M. de Fuentcis. Ah ! where shall I find expres- sions to render a feeling so novel to my soul ? You have filled me with the tenderest, warmest gratitude ; it seems to me that never did I owe so much to any one ; your emotion, your sentiment, are noble and lofty as virtue itself ; why should I not make my happiness in adoring them ? I do not know the nature of my own feeling, but you are the object of it, and there are moments when I am ready to exclaim that remorse is no longer in my heart. Alas ! I dare not say those words ; I feel, I know that conscience cannot be deceived. A\niat trouble rises within me ! how unhappy I am ! J/o?i ami, do you think it possible that peace can return to my soul by loving you? — or do you think it possible that I can live without lo\'ing you ? It is of you that I ask knowledge of myself ; I know myself no longer; with a word you change the disposition of my souL I know not if this is so because I am weakened by -.774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 163 siiifermg, or because my feeling is strengthened by the pains I take to combat and destroy it. If it be the latter, admit that I have a very high opinion of myself ! Ah ! 711011 Dieu ! how natm-al passion is to me, and how foreign is reason ! Mon ami, never did any one so reveal herself ; but how could I hide from you my inmost thoughts ? — they are filled by you ; and how could I live if I knew I were usurping your esteem and good opinion ? No, mon ami, see me as I am, and grant me — not what I deserve, but — what I need to keep me from dying of grief, or to give me courage, for I know not which I prefer to owe to you, life or death. Both depend on you, and whichever way you decide, I shall thank you. Mon ami, did you feel as you wrote them the force of those words: "My greatest misfortune would lie to make you cold to me " ? — and you wish to " diminish my torture." Ah heavens ! what a means }ou employ to that end ! But I will not return upon the past 1 hope I shall be deceived by you no more. If I am not what you love best I shall at least see in your soul the place you assign me, and I pledge myself to seek no other. I went again to " Orpheus " this evening ; but I was with Mme. de Chatillon : it is true that I should have a very bad opinion of myself if I did not love her ; she exacts so little and gives so much. Monday morning. How can you question whether you ought to have left me in ignorance of your fever ? Oh ! man ami, it is not I whom you ought to spare ; I love you too well not to prefer to suffer with you and through you. Those' who spare one another do not love ; there is a wide distance between the feelings we command and those which command us : the first are perfect, and I abhor them. If some day you become per 164 LETTERS OF [1774 feet like Mine, de B . . . , like the cold Grandison, I shall admire you, monami, but I shall be radically cured. Here I was interrupted by Mme. de Chatillon ; she asks to write on the rest of this sheet ; I give her paper and pens — but my letter, it is not possible ! Monday, after the postman. You have been alarmed — you are still distressed. Mon Dieu ! how I suffer from all that makes you suffer, and how grieved I am for having added to the anxiety of your present condition. Yes, I am guilty, I am weak, [ condemn myself, I hate myself, but that will not repair the harm I have done to you. You saw by the followmg post that this fever was merely the result of the violent state of my soul ; my body is not strong enough to support these shocks. Mon ami, do not pity me ; say to yourself, " She is beside herself ; " that thought will calm you, and if you do not suffer I am happy. But I hope that you will tell me, carefully and with details, all the news of your patients. It is dreadful to fear for those we love ; that species of torture is more than my strength and my reason can bear. Mon Dieu ! yes, you must stay with your family ; your departure would do them great harm, and you must spare them during the whole time that their health is in question. But I need not say this to you ; you see things better than I ; you feel with greater delicacy. Mon ami, I am almost discontented because you do not find pleasure in making me share your present condition, especially as it is painful to you ; I would have you say with Montaigne, but in a contrary sense, " Methinks I rob her of her part." Yes, mon ami, you ought to feel that you have no longer the right to suffer alone. Alas ! I am so wholly on the tone of those who suffer, they speak my language so distinctly, that it seems to me there is 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 165 no need to count on my affections in order to find sweetness in complaint to me. Adieu, mon ami ; I meant to write you a thousand nothings but your sadness takes awa}' my strength. In vain I say to myself: " 'V^^len my letter reaches him his condition will no longer be the same " — but that in which you were possesses me ; it cannot change, for me until you will it should. Ah ! what ascendency ! what force ! what power ! it acts through a thousand leagues ! I told you that the sentiment I dare not name is the sole thing on earth that men have been unable to spoil. Mon ami, if it were lost, tell yourself always, so long as I live, that you know where it lives, where it reigns with more vigour than it does in most Frenchwomen. Friday evening, October 21, 1774. Mon ami ! how slowly time rolls on ! since Monday last I am weighed down by it ; there is nothing I have not tried, to cheat my impatience. I am perpetually in motion ; I have been everywhere, I have seen everything, and I have had but one thought — to a sick soul nature has but one colour ; all things are swathed in crape. Tell me, how do people distract their thoughts ' how do they console themselves ? Ah ! it is from you alone that I can learn to endure life ; you alone can shed upon it that charm mingled with sorrow which makes me cherish and detest existence alternately. Mon ami, 1 shall have a letter from }ou to-morrow ; that hope alone gives me strength to write to you to-night. You will tell me if you are reassured about the health of your dear ones ; and perhaps you will speak of your return ; but, at any rate, you will speak to me. If you only knew how destitute, abandoned, I feel when I have jio news of you ! Ah ! how short your little letter was ! how cold ! It seemed to me that in saying how uneasy and even alarmed you were, you 166 LETTERS OF [1774 were not saying all ! What is it ? are you hiding your heart from me ? do you wish still to rend mine ? Have you not told me that you wx)uld tell me all ; that you would give me a con- fidence without reserve ; that I was your friend ; that your soul could pour itself into mine ; that you would make me live in all your emotions ; that whatever wounded my heart could never be unknown by yours ? Ah ! mon ami, know me well ; see what I am for you ; and, having that knowledge, it will be impossible for you to conceive a project of deceiving me, or even of concealing anything from me. Saturday morning. I left you yesterday out of consideration for you ; I was so sad ' I liad just come from " Orpheus." That music drives me wild ; it sweeps me away ; I cannot miss it a single day ; my soul thirsts for that species of pain. Ah ! mon Dieu ! how little I am on the key of those about me ! yet never had any one more cause to treasure friendship. My friends are excellent persons ; their attentions, their interest never flags ; and I now comprehend what they find in me to attach them. It is my sorrow, it is my trouble, it is what I say, it is what I do not say, that stirs them, that warms their hearts. Yes, I see it, kind and feeling hearts love the unhappy ; they find in them an attraction that occupies and employs their soul ; we love to feel ourselves feeling, and the sorrows of others have just that measure which makes us compassionate with- out suffering. Well ! I promise them that enjoyment so long as it remains to me to live. Mon ami, 1 meant to tell you, the last time I wrote, that you ought to lodge in the same furnished house as the Chevalier d'Aguesseau ; that would spare you both the trouble of going to see each other ; it would be convenient for you, and I should be secured against your quitting my 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 167 quarter. Yes, it is always some personal interest that un- derlies all, that prompts all, and the fools and the false wits who have attacked Helvdtius have doubtless never loved, and never reflected. Ah ! good God ■ how many people live and die without having felt the one or done the other 1 So much the better for them, so much the worse for us — yes, so much the worse ; for I cannot express to you the disgust, the paroxysms of disgust, which I feel, not for the fools, but for hose who are so much of my own kind that I foresee what chey are going to say before they open their lips. — Ah ! I am very ill ! I can no longer endure those who resemble me ; all that is beside me, on my level, seems so small ; I need to be made to raise my eyes ; without which I am wear- ied and dulled. Mon ami, society offers me now but two in- terests : I must love, or I must be enlightened. Intelligence is not enough, I want much intellect ; that is saying that I now listen to five or six persons only, and that I read but six or seven books. Yet there are many more persons than that who have claims upon me ; but they are claims of feel- ing and confidence, and do not alter my condition of mind in general. Here is the result : what is less than myself smothers me and crushes me ; what is at my level didls me and fatigues me. It is only that which is above me that sustains me and tears me from myself ; I shall ever say with the old classic, " Friends ' save me from myself." All this proves that vanity, extinct within me, is replaced by uni- versal and deadly disgust. The Comtesse de Boufflers has not reached that point, therefore she is very agreeable. I have seen her often this week ; she came to dine with Mme. Geoffrin on Wednesday and was charming ; she did not say a word that was not a paradox. She was attacked, and defended herself so wittily that her fallacies were almost as good as truth. ¥ov in- 168 LE'ITEHS OF [1774 stance : she said it was a gieat misfortune to be an ambassa- dor, it mattered not from what country or to what nation ; it was dreadful exile, etc. Then she told us that, in the days when she liked England best, she would never have con- sented to live there permanently unless she could have taken with her twenty-four or five of her intimate friends, and sixty to eighty other x^ersons who were absolutely neces- sary to her ; and it was with much seriousness and especially with much feeling that slie tluis inf(jrmed us of the needs of her soul. What I wish you could liave seen was the aston- ishment she caused in Lord Shelburne. He is simple, natural ; he has soul and strength ; he likes and is attracted by that only whicli resembles himself, at least in being natural. He went to see M. de Malesherbes, and returned enchanted. He said to me : " I have seen for the first time in my life what I did not believe could exist, — a man whose soul is absolutely exempt from fear and hope, but who, nevertheless, is full of life and ardour. Nothing in the world can trouble his peace ; nothing is necessary to him, but he interests himself keenly in all that is good." And then he added : " I have travelled much, and I have never brought away with me so deep an impression. If I do any good during the time that remains to me to live, T am cer- tain that the recollection of M. de Malesherbes will inspire my soul." Mon ami, that is noble praise, and he who gives it is, beyond a doubt, an interesting man. I think him very fortunate to be born an Englishman ; 1 have seen much of him and listened to him much ; he has intellect, ardour, elevation of soul. He reminds me a little of the two men in the world whom I have loved, and for whom 1 would live or die. He goes away next week, and I am glad ; he has been the cause, through social arrangements, that I have dined every day with fifteen persons, and that fatigues 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 169 me more than it interests. I need repose ; my bodily machine is worn-out. Good-bye, mon ami, I await the post ; that is what is necessary to me. Saturday, October 22, 1774. 3fon Dieu ! how troubled and grieved I am by what you tell me. I believe all that I fear ; imagine, therefore, how I share what you suffer. Ah ! it is at such moments that separation is absolutely intolerable to me. Mon ami, your troubles are mine, and it is dreadful to me to be unable to comfort you. It seems to me that if I were with you I could so take possession of your fears, your troubles, that nothing would remain to you but that which I could not take away. Ah ! to share is not enough. I would suffer through you, for you ; and with such tenderness, such pas- sion, there is no sorrow that could not be assuaged, no alarm that could not be quieted. Mo)i Dieu ! how unfortunate I am ! At the only moment of my life when I might have done you good, I am condemned to be useless to you ! Those who love you will say to you what I should say — better, perhaps. I am too near you to express what I feel. Are there words that can render all the emotions of a suffering soul, of a soul struck by terror, and to which misfortune has forbidden hope ? Mon ami, \h this state, which is mine, we can express and explain ourselves by three words only : " I love you." Ah ! if they could pass into your soul just as I feel them ! Yes, if they could, whatever be your sorrow, you would feel a gentler feeling. Noiv it is that I have a mortal regret at all you lack in affection for me ; mon ami, were it otherwise, we could make our consolation ; the remedy would be beside the ill. Ah ' when one is in trouble it is dreadful to love feebly : for it is in ourselves that we find true strength, and nothing gives it so much as passion ; the feelings of another 170 LETTERS OF [1774 please us, touch us; there are noue but our own tliat support us. But that resource fails nearly all the world , nearly all who exist love only because they are loved. Ah ! mon Dieu ! what a poor way ! how small and feeble it leaves the soul ! But this depends neither on will nor on thought ; it is therefore as senseless to seek to excite it as to labour to quench it. Let us stay, then, what we are, until nature, or I know not what, ordains otherwise. You are too kind, a thousand times too kind to occupy your mind with my ills. To suffer has become my exist- ence ; still I am better since I have taken chicken for my only nourishment ; I suffer less. Adieu, mon ami, I speak of myself and think only of you. From now till Monday I shall be in a violent state. You will write me, I believe. Sunday evening, October 23, 1774. Mon ami, to calm myself, to deliver myself from a thought that pains me, I must speak to you. I await to-morrow's post- hour with an impatience that you alone, perhaps, can conceive. You will hear me, if you cannot answer me, and that is some- thing. It would be, no doubt- sweeter, more consoling, to speak in dialogue; but monologue is endurable when we can say to ourselves, "I speak in solitude, but I am heard." Mon ami, I am in a detestable physical condition, which I attribute to that hemlock ; it retained, I believe, some poison- ous property ; I feel an exhaustion, a faintness, which has made me think twenty times to-day that I was about to lose consciousness, and at this moment I feel an inexpressible distress. I feel what Fontenelle described shortly before his death, — "a great difficulty in Icing." But that which excites my soul will give me strength to writp. Mon anii 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 171 I do not know if I told you I had seen the wife of Comte . . . ; her appearance is common, but her tone is ol^liging, and she shows a great desire to please ; nevertheless, such as she is, I should not think her good enough to be the wife of the man I love most. Mon ami^ I am more than ever sure that a man who has talent, genius, and is destined to fame, ought not to marry. Marriage is a veritable extinguisher of all that is great and may be dazzling. If a man is honom- able and feeling enough to be a good husband, he will be nothing more ; no doubt that is enough if happiness is there. But there are men destined by Nature to be great and not happy. Diderot says that Xatm-e in creating a man of genius, waves her torch above his head and says to him, " Be great, and be unhappy." That, I think, is what she said on the day that you were born. Good-night, I can no more ; to-morrow ! Monday, after post-time. Xo letter ! I should tremble were it another than you ; but I reassure myselt a little by remembering that it is not in you to be punctual or consecutive. This is natural, but also afflicting. Mon ami, I make you no reproaches ; I only pity you, whatever be your situation, that the thought of your soul was not for me. Adieu ; I am de- pressed, and in a state of weakness which is extraordinary ; it requires an effort to hold my pen. I shall no longer ex- pect letters from you ; but I shall desire them as long as I breathe. Tuesday evening, October 25, 1774. Ah ! I have been unjust ; that would be a wrong in any one, but I reproach myself for it as a crime with you. Forgive me, mon ami ; I ought to have thanked you, and I blamed you. That thought hurts me as though I were guilty ; but the post was guilty, and I suspected it so little that when 172 LETTERS OF [1774 they brought me my letters to-day I did not look at the outside of them; I did not care which I read first or last. Mon ami, when I opened the second I gave a cry ; it was your writing ! my heart palpitated. If it is a very painful ill to await and see notldny come, it is a very keen and very lively pleasure to be thus surprised. Mon ami, I love you to madness ; all things tell it to me, all things prove it — and often more than I wish. I give you more than you desire ; you have no need of being so much loved, and I, I have much need of repose, that is, of death. But I am too selfish ; I talk to you of myself, whereas I ought to tell you of the pleasure with which I read your words : " Better — all goes well — I am at ease." Ah I mon ami, I breathed again ; it seemed as if those words gave back to me both life and strength ; for three days I was annihilated; they say this condition came from the nerves, but I who know more than my doctor, I know that it came from you. I am like Lucas, who explains everything by his vocation of gardener. Ah ! mon Dieu ! how can I suf- fice for all I feel, for all I suffer ? — and yet my soul has but two feelings : one consumes me with sorrow, and when I give myself up to the other, which ought to calm me, I am pursued by remorse and by a regret more heart-breaking still than the tortures of remorse. Myself again ! how I detest this cease- less return ! do I banish myself in saying that I adore your sensibility and your truth ? Ah ! hide nothing from me ; you gain much by letting me see all the emotions that move you. Mon ami, in a situation precisely like that in which you have been, but which had fatal results, M. de Mora wrote me, with almost the same expressions as yours, the anguish that his mother's illness caused him. I have already told you never to have the thought of sparing me ; believe that my feelings will lead 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 173 me much farther than you could make me go. Mon ami, it is good to know that your mother's convalescence is so near, but, in spite of what you say, I feel that you will stay there longer than you think. You will certainly commit the heedlessness of forgetting to tell me not to write to you and where to wi-ite to you on your way. Then, when no letters reach you, you will blame me, or you will have the kindness to feel anxious; yet a little forethought would avoid it all. The Chevalier de Chastellux is at present at Chanteloup with the Due de Choiseul. He keeps up with everything, and attaches great importance to this manner of multiplying himself indefinitely. He is so rich and so generous that he disdains to gather in for himself ; it suffices him to sow ; he receives nothing ; he gives everywhere and to everybody. He told me the other day that his pleasure lay in producing effects. M. de Cham fort has arrived ; I have seen him, and we read together his " Eulogy on La Fontaine." He returns from the baths in good health, richer in fame and wealth, and possessed of four friends who love him, namely : Mes- dames de Grammont, de Eanc^, d'Amblimont, and the Com- tesse de Choiseul. This assortment is almost as variegated as Harlequin's coat, but it is only the more piquant, agree- able, and charming. 1 assure you that M. de Chamfort is a very well-satisfied young man ; and he does his best to be modest. M. Grimm has returned from Eussia. I have overwhelmed him with questions. He pictures the Czarina [Catherine II.], not as a sovereign, but as an interesting woman, full of wit and good sayings, and all that can seduce and charm. In what he told me of her I recognize more the charming art of the Greek courtesan than the dignity and state of the empress of a great empire. But a greater painter in another manner has returned to us ; I mean Diderot ; he sends me word that I shall see him 174 LETl'ERS OF [1774 to-]iiuiTOW ; I shall be very glad. JiuL in the present condi- tion of my soul, he is the man of all otliers whom I would rather not see hal)itually ; he forces tlie attention, and that is precisely what 1 cannot and will uot give consecutively to any one. When 1 say that, you understand that it means I do uot wish my thoughts to be distracted from the one person who tills them wholl}-. All ! what a clumsy explana- tion ! But the truth is you are stupid ; one must ticket a thing to make you understand it. Courage, mon ami ; for 1 think that by this time you have had a ream of paper with- out deducting a single page. You can put off the reading of it till you are in your travelling-carriage ; I shall occupy your journey, and you will find me at the end of it. So you really think that you will be glad to see me ? WTiat you say to me is so agreeable. It would be sweet, indeed, to be loved by you ! but my soul cannot attain to that degree of happiness ; it would be too much. A few moments, a few flashes of pleasure, — that is enough for the unhappy ; they breathe and recover courage to suffer. Wednesday, October 26, 1774. I have just re-read your letter ; a sentence had escaped my notice, and it delights me ; you say, " I return to our troubles ..." Ah ! tell me on what thought I can rest to breathe in peace ; on that of your arrival ? No, no, it makes me quiver; I dare not even desire it; if it were delayed I believe I should die. Can you conceive such an excess of inconsistency ? But that excess does not proceed from false reasoning ; it comes from a soul con\'ulsed by the most con- tending emotions, which you may, perhaps, imderstand, but are unable to share. I am interrupted, and again by Mme. de Chatillon. I begin to think that the first of all qualities required to 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 175 make others love us is to be loving. You cannot imagine all that she invents to reach my heart. Ah ! if you loved me as she does ! — no, no ! I do not wish it ; heaven pre- serve me from knowing twice in my life such happiness. Friday, October 28, 1774. What say you to that invocation ? does it not seem as if I had lost my head ? Moii ami, it comes from an honourable sentiment. I wronged M. de Mora, and I find a sort of sweetness in thinking that he alone will have made me know happiness ; that it is to him only that I shall ever owe having felt, for a short while, all the value that life can" have. Sometimes I feel myself less guilty because I am punished; and, do you not see, all that would be reversed, effaced, if I were loved ? I must hold to virtue b}- remorse, and to him who loved me by regret for having lost him. That regret is very keen and heart-rending ; there are few days when it does not cause me convulsions of despair. They forced me to go and see Lekain in " Tancrfede ; " I had not seen it since its improvement, and I did not care to. However, I went ; the first two acts wearied me exces- sively ; the third has much interest, which goes on increas- ing to the end ; in the fifth act there were moments, words which transported me to the scene at Bordeaux. I thought I was dying ; I lost consciousness, and they were obliged to watch with me all night because I had continual fainting fits. I could not speak to you of this the last few days ; I was too near to the impression I had received; I promised myself not to go in search of such shocks again. I can bear nothing but " Orpheus," and I find with regret that you will not see it. There is to be a new opera November 8 ; the music is by Floquet. The public may like it perhaps ; after what is good it applauds what is mediocre, and even what is 176 ' LETTERS OF [1774 detestable, — for M. Dorat has had success. And it is the public that make reputations ! — but the public of the long run ; for that of the moment never has tlie taste nor the intelligence which sets the seal on what shcnild go down to posterity. Bring me back the Linguet [a political and liter- ary journal]. Everybody is at Fontainebleau ; but we still have Tiarou de Kock and Baron Gleichen, and they stay too late in the evenings for me. I do not know if I deceive myself, but I believe solitude would be good for me ; soci- ety seldom interests me now, and it always weighs upon me. Oh ! what a poor invalid T am ! In vain T tuin to this and that; I am only the worse for it. Adieu, mon ami. I have just seen the Comte de C . . . I told him he would have to breathe malarious air, for in I lie intoxication of felicity in which he is living it could only be a work of mercy in him to come and see me, and that I should be to him like those monuments that some philosophers preserve to make them remember to be good and just. "You will come and see me," I said, " and when you go away you will say to yourself : ' Trouble does exist on earth, after all ; ' your heart will be touched by my sorrows, and mine will have enjoyed your felicity." The letters of M. de Condorcet are really charming. If I followed my first impulse I should write you all that I have felt about them ; but I stop, saying to myself : " He will soon return, I will let him read them ; he will laugh at me and think me very enthusiastic — well, perhaps so, but he ivill he here." Mon ami, on that condition I would consent not to have common-sense for the rest of my life ; but then you would abandon me and I should be lost in the crowd — well, stupidity would console me there. I think that during all this time " The Gracchi " must have been forgotten [tragedy 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 177 in verse by M. de Guibert]. But you will return to them with more ardour and interest. Mon ami, admire my transi- tions ; stupidity leads me to genius, ^ud this progression is very natural ; it is M. Turgot after the Abbe Terrai. There are cases where gradations and intermediaries disappear. I do not know what to do with the time between now and Saturday ; I shall make a little of it weigh on you by ubliging you to read me. I hope — I promise myself a long letter on Saturday. Suppose I am disappointed ! suppose that it is only four pages long ! Oh, then I should complain. Mon ami, you see good luck has turned my head ; I become almost saucy just because I have had news of you to-day. What is very certain is that if others were in my secret they would know from my health and my whole manner of being whether I have had a letter from you. Yes, the cii'cu- lation of my blood is perceptibly changed, and at such times it is impossible for me to take part in anything. But what I never become indifferent to is the increased interest that my state inspires in my friends. Mon Dieu ! would they pity me if they saw^ into the depths of my heart ? That usurpation of my love, was it not criminal ? Mon ami, do not make my conscience false ; pity me, console me ; you have only too long misled me. I have a fancy to send you the letter T took up and read before yours to-dav (could I have had a presentiment, that would not have been the order of my reading ) ; you will see from this letter whether I have suffered from your absence. Yes, I have made M. d'Alembert very uneasy. The man who wTites the letter knows nothing of all that fills my thoughts ; he thinks me a victim of virtue and prejudice ; but for the last three years he has seen me so unhappy that he is sometimes inclined to thmk me mad. He spends his life in making epigi-ams against me ; but the fact is, the point of 178 LETTERS OF [1774 them is always a touch of sentiment or of wrath. Kead and recognize ; very surely he is a man (jf intellect. Sunday, October 30, 1774. 1 am notified too late ; a package has gone to the post to-day ; when 3'our letter came I had aheady sent it to M. Turgot to be countersigned. I expected to write you a line after the arrival of the postman, and send it in the usual way, but no juatter. I hope that my vi»kime will not be lost ; it will surely be sent to you, and with all the more care because M. Turgot's name will be seen upon it. I think, truly, that it is easy to criticise you without wound- ing you ; l)ut it is nt)t so easy to praise you as I feel that you deserve, without running tlie risk of being thought ex- aggerated, insipid, and munotoiiiiiis. Well, I abandon myself to it, and will tell you coarsel}- that your letter to M. Turgot is excellent, perfect ; it is the right tone, the proper measure ; in short, it is you, and I know nothing better or greater on earth. I told you, mon ami, that henceforth I could look only at that which made me raise my eyes ; but you, you are so high that I could not lift them to you long without too great an effort. Ah ! mon ami, how I wish you had a fortune ; I wish you had easy circumstances ; I wish you were not forced to wear out j-our talents, to wring the neck of your genius ; in short, I wish you were not condemned to put yourself back among the common herd. Yes, on my honour, it is for your sake, for the interests of your fame only, that I look for your marriage ; in that respect I can truly say wi,th Eacine, " The day is not purer than the depth of my heart." All that means, mon ami, that if an excellent match offered itself, if you had one in view, if I or my friends could help you, oh ! count on the zeal, the activity, the passion we would put into making it successful; yes, 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 179 I should again know joy and pleasure, if I could see you happy. \Miat pretty verses those are in your letter ! That need to " live strongly " is, I believe, the need of the damned. That recalls to me a speech of passion that gave me pleasure. " If ever," it was said to me, " if ever I gi-ow calm again, I shall feel myself in torture." That language is for the use of only such persons as are endowed with the sixth sense, soul. Yes, mon ami, I am fortunate enough, or unfor- tunate enough, to have the same dictionar}" as yourself. I understand, or rather I feel, your definitions, whereas for three-fourths of the time I do not comprehend the Chevalier. He is so content with what he does, he knows so well what he will do, he loves reason so truly, in a word, he is so proper about everything, that once I came near speaking and wi-itiug to him as the Chevalier Grandison — but without envying the fate of Clementma or Miss G . . . You know, of course, that the Comte de Broglie commands at Metz in place of M. de Conflans. Mon ami, there 's a witty man ; I wish he might be useful to you, to you who have not his wit. Apropos of wit, I must teU you a saying of the Czarina to Diderot. They often argued ; and one day when the dis- pute was more lively than usual, the Czarina stopped short, saying : " We are both too excited to be reasonable ; your head is hot and mine is warm, we shall not know what we are saying — " " With this difference," cried Diderot, " that you can say what you please without impropriety, whereas I may fail in — " " For shame ! " interrupted the Czarina, " what difference is there between men ? " Mon ami, read that cor- rectly and do not be as stupid as M. d'Alembert, who could see nothing in it but difference of sex, whereas the speech is only charming as being that of a sovereign speaking to a philosopher. She said to him on another occasion : " Some- 180 LETTERS OF [1774 times I see you a hundred years old, and then again, like a child of twelve." That is sweet, and pretty, and paints Diderot. If you loved children a liUle more, I would tell you that I think I liave observed that what pleases up to a certain point always has some analogy with them ; they have such grace, such suppleness, so mucli of Xatuie ' In fact. Harlequin is a composition of child and cat ; and what could be more graceful. Do you know what vexes me about that package that is run- ning after you ? You will receive so late the letter asking pardon for having blamed you unjustly ; the post was guilt}-, not you, and I was its accomplice. But is it you or the post who are to blame this time ? You write me, " I answer your letters of the 9th and 14th." Why do you jump, feet together, over the 11th, which was a Tuesday? I have written by all the couriers since that moment when I was mad with a fatal madness. Mon ami, you will miss a great day, that of the re-opening of parliament. Oh ! the crowd of spectators promise them- selves great pleasures ; but wise people like myself do not con- cern themselves about this first moment; it is the results, the consequences of this event which have such interest. The question is, are they judges or tyrants whom we are about to replace on the fleurs-de-lis ? — You ask why I do not talk to the Chevalier about " Orpheus." Mon ami, because it would be barbarous to talk of colours at the Quinze-Vingts [blind asylum]. Adieu. Monday, eleven o'clock at night, November 7, 1774. Mon ami, it seems to me that you have rights over all the emotions and sentiments of my soul. I owe you an account of all my thoughts ; I do not feel assured of their correctness until I communicate them to you. Listen to me, therefore, 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 181 and judge my judgment, or rather my instinct ; for I have nought but that for things of intellect, of art, and of taste. Yes, mon ami, the Academy of Marseille has only done justice in crowning M. de Chamfort. Ah! mon Dieu ! at what a distance now seems to me that Eulog}' which gave me such pleasme, and will give me more ! How rich is this one [Chamfort's " Eulogy on La Fontaine " ] ! how full of intelligence, intelligence of all kinds, refinement, strength, elevation, philosophy ! How lively the style, how animated and rapid, how filled it is with happy expressions, how original the tone and turn of the phrases ! In a word, I am truly charmed, and if I did not fear to spoil your pleas- ure I would quote to you some points, each more piquant than the rest. I recommend to }ou page 14. Tell me, am I mistaken ? is it not full of the most exquisite sensibility ? has he not ennol)led benefactions and gratitude ? does he not express all the sentiments that a lofty, sensitive, and impas- sioned soul would desire to feel and to inspire ? Mon ami, I am so satisfied with it that I could wish you had done it ; and yet I am certain that you could do better ; you would go higher, you would not have his defects. But pronounce your verdict quickly : have I too much enthusiasm ? At any rate no one has put it into me ; for 1 have seen and heard no one. I received the Eulogy at nine o'clock ; I nearly died of impatience to be altjue : I have read it, and give you my first impressions, at the risk of your thinking them devoid of common-sense. Let nothing turn you, in disgust, from reading to me what you write ; I will be Molifere's servant ; I will discuss noth- ing, but I shall feel all. What taste and intelligence you show in narrowing your subject. In the best of tragedies there are tedious and languid passages. You will avoid these defects ; the interest will always be sustained by the subject ]82 LETTERS OF [1774 and action of the l>lay. The mind of the author will never appear, but the soul and genius of M. de Guibert will fill and animate the whole. Mon ami, why that oath not to read me at once, immediately, what I desire so much to hear and feel ? Is it because what moves you is not what I would desire to know and think for the rest of my life? Ah ! how ill you understood me in the first instance, and how well you have since replied to me about Lord Shelburne ! Yes, it is just that, his being the leader of the Opposition, that makes me esteem and like him. How could one tiot be disconsolate at being born imder a government like ours ? As for me, weak and unfortunate being that I am, if I could be born again I would rather be the lowest member of the House of Commons than even the King of Prussia ; nothing but Voltaire's fame could console me for not having been born an Englishman, One word more about Lord Shelburne and I will never speak of him again. How do you think he rests his brain and his soul from the worries of government ? In doing deeds of beneficence that are worthy of a sovereign ; in creating public institutions for the education of all the tenants of his estates, entering into all the details of their instruction and comfort. That, mon ami, is the relaxation of a man who is only thirty-four years old, and whose soul is as tender as it is great and strong. There is an Englishman worthy to have been the friend of the wonder and miracle of the Spanish nation [M. de Mora]. That is the man whom I wish you could have seen ; but if you had, you would always have regretted him ; for assuredly he is not made to live in this country. He leaves on the 1.3th; he wants to see the re-entrance of our parliament ; meanwhile he is giving himself up to the dissipations of Paris. In all his life he has never known that species of relaxation ; he finds much delight and charm in it. "It is pleasure," he said to me, 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 183 "because it will not last; for such a life forever would become the most intolerable weariness." Hew far that is from a Frenchman, from one of those agreeable men at Court. Ah ! President Montesquieu was right when he said, " The government makes the man." A man gifted with energy, loftiness of soul, and genius is in this country a lion chaiued in a menagerie ; the sense that he has of his strength tortures him ; he is a Patagonian condemned to walk on his knees. Mon ami, there is but one career open for glory, but it is noble. It is that of the Moliferes, the Eacines, the Voltaires, the d'Alemberts, etc. Yes, mon ami, you must limit yourself to that because the world so wills it. Good- night; I do not know if this letter will start; but I have talked with you, and I am satisfied. Sunday, ten o'clock at night, November 13, 1774. Ah ! mon ami, you have hurt me ; it is a great curse, for you and for me, this feeling that inspires me. You do right to tell me you have no need of being loved as I can love. No, that is not according to your measm'e. You are so per- fectly amiable and agi-eeable that you are, or will become, the first object of those charming ladies who put on their heads all that is inside of them, and are so lovable that they love themselves in preference to all else. You will make the pleasure, you will crown the vanity of all those women. By what fatality did you hold me to life only to make me die of uneasiness and pain ? Mon ami, I make no complaint, but I grieve that you set no value on my peace of mind ; that thought freezes and tears my heart by turns. How is it possible to have a moment's tranquillity with a man whose head is as bad as his carriage, who thinks of no danger, who foresees nothing, who is incapable of punctuality, who never by any chance does what he has planned ; in a 184 LETTERS OF [1774 word, a man carried away, by everything, whom nothing can stop or fix ? Oh ! my God ! is it in thine anger, in thy ven- geance, that thou hast doomed me to love and adore him who is the torture and despair of my soul ? — Yes, mon ami, what you call your faults may perhaps kill me, — I hope they may, — but nothing can chill me. If my will, if reason, if reflec- tion could have done anytlung, should 1 have loved you ? Alas ! at what a time was 1 pushed, precipitated into this abyss of misfortune \ I shudder at it still ! Good-night ; not once has my door been opened to-day that my heart did not beat ; tliere were moments when I dreaded to hear }our name, and then again I was broken-hearted at not hearing it. So many contradictions, so many conflicting emotions are true, and three words explain them : / love ijou. nu. Your letter of Thursday morning was hard and unjust ; that of an hour earlier was overwhelming from the excess of truth and unreserve with which you tell me that you have never loved me, and that henceforth you cannot live for any one, etc. and etc. Do you know that such an avowal turns my remorse to shame ? I cannot think of myself witliout horror, and from you I turn away my thoughts; I wish to neither judge you nor hate you. Yesterday you came so late, and were so eager to get away that you proved to me you yielded to my note; and that seemed to me very natural. I only mention this to let you know that I am aware that you will not be annoyed at not seeing me this morning. I expect the Archbishop of Aix ; he has something he wishes to say to me. My door will be closed. In the afternoon I am going to pay visits and I shall not return home till after eight o'clock. To-morrow I dine with the Comte de C . . . and have visits to pay untO. eight 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 185 o'clock. I tell you my arrangements, not that I think they will influence yours, but to spare you the trouble of trying to see me or avoid me. The person who disposes of you and of your time will not allow you to give yourself up to the disgust you feel for the world and for society. You will find distraction, peace, pleas- ure, happiness with her and at her house ; and you will no longer be afflicted by the mortal disgust which must surely be attached to the wrong of deceiving those who love us. Ah ! it was not worth while. You nuist feel very guilty towards her ; yield yourself up- this time to the invincible penchant that allures you ; offend her no longer by puttmg any comparison between the feeling that you owe to her and that with which others inspire you. Mon Dieit ! I know not why I should speak of what occupies your mind ; it is, doubtless, from the liabit of alwa}s liking to please you. We read last night the " Kuh)gy of lleasou " [by Voltaire]. They all thought it excellent. I wish you had heard it. The reading did not finish till ten o'clock. Eleven at night, 1774. , I have read your note. It is very gentle, it is very honest ; your conversation was very harsh, very cruel even. I was crushed by it. Never, no never, was my soul so beaten down, my body more weakened. You had formed the intention of never seeing me again. Well, then, why change it ? You gave me strength to accomplish my intention, to satisfy the most urgent need of my soul ; we should both have been re- lieved and delivered; I, of a burden which overpowers me, you, of the sight of a sorrow which annoys you often and always weighs upon you. No, I have no thanks to give you I prefer yoiu- first impulse to your reflection. In doing me wrong you gave me strength : in consoling me, as I have 186 LETTERS OF [1774 told you again and again, you hold me back, but you do not bind me to you. Oh ! it is perhaps you who make me feel in a deeper and more heart-rending manner the loss I have met with. Nothing would have led me to compare you de- liberately ; this involuntary thought casts me often into de- spair ; in this condition "of mind I know not which is the most dreadful, my regrets or my remorse. But what does all this matter to you ? The opera, the dissipation and whirl- wind of society sweeps you along, and that is just; I do not complain ; I grieve. Nevertheless, I wish you would come here to-morrow after supper ; you can then speak to M. d'Alembert, and perhaps to M. de Vaines ; he sends me word that he will probably be here. I have seen M. Turgot this evening ; it is more than six months since I have been tete a t^te with him. I was dull, and I think he must have regretted the time he wasted on me. Good-night. I have a burning heat ; fever consumes me. Ah ! this death is too slow ! You hastened me this morning ; why retain me to-night ? Saturday, eleven at night, 1774. How wise you were not to come to the theatre. I have no words to express the weary disgust T felt ; I had, besides, a feeling of physical discomfort which was almost pain ; it ended by being beyond my strength to pass my evening with Mme. de Chatillon, although I had promised her to do so. I feel that there is a degree of unhappiness which takes from us the strength to endure ennui ; it is dreadful to me to be a passive listener to trivialities, often revolting, and nearly always as stupid as they are low. Oh ! the detest- able play! how bourgeois the author is, what a common, limited mind ! how stupid the public are ! what bad taste good company can show ! how I pity the unfortunate writers J774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 187 who are hoping to acquh-e reputation from the stage ! If ^ou only knew how the audience applauded ! Molifere could never have had a greater success. Nothing was noble about the play except the names and the clothes ; the author made Henri lY. and the Court people talk in the style of a bour- geois of Saint-Denis. It is true that he gave the same style to the peasants. In a word, this work [comedy in three acts by Colle, entitled " A Hunting party of Henri IV."] is to me a masterpiece of bad taste and platitudes ; and the people in society who praise it seem to me like valets saying good of their masters. Have you news of your mother ? is she better ? and is your father's return a certainty ? Nothing but that can console me for your having left this faubourg. And you, mon ami, how have you spent your day ? In not doing what you said you should, is not that so ? and to-morrow you will not work ; always an activity which makes a hun- dred plans, and an easiness in dropping them on the least pretext — regrets, desires, agitation, but never any repose. Oh ! mon ami, you must be loved before you are known, as you were by me ; for after judging you, it would be devoting one's self to hell to pin one's happiness upon you. I will tell you my whole day to-morrow, Sunday, so that you may give me the moments that 'will least inconvenience you. First, mass ; then a visit to a sick friend before dinner. I dine with Mme. de Chatillon ; at four o'clock I go to the hotel de La Eochefoucauld ; then I shall return home about half-past six, and not go out again. Adieu, mon ami ; I love you, but I feel too sad and too stupid to know how to tell you so. Mon ami, may I ask you, without offence, to return me the letter of the Abb^ de B . . . ? for I do not venture to reclaim the pages torn from my letters. I was wrong to notice it. 188 LETTERS OF [1774 and by speaking to you alxmt tliem I have roused your " indignation," That feeling is just ; I dare not complain of it. Ah ! I am too " difficult to please," too " exacting," too " crabbed." 1 have all the faults of an unhappy being who loves to desperation and who has but one emotion and one thought. Adieu again. Midday, 1774. You did not tell me, you did not write it, and I can prove this to you. The hope of seeing you suffices to stop and change all my arrangements; you can judge, therefore, whether, with the certaint}- of seeing you, I was likely to go out. But as you depend on the arrangements of Mme. de . . . , }ou can never foresee, or say with certamty what you will do. Mon ami, there is no great harm in that ; mis- understandings result, but you are free, that is the important thing. I am soiTy you did not let yourself be driven to where Mme. de . . . was stopping. M. de Saint-Lambert was going to the Place Vendome — but you never know what you want to do nor where 30U are going. However, what does it matter ? If you were amused, if you were satis- fied and happy at the close of your day, you did well, you were right, and your way of life must be a good one. Change nothing. As for me, I am sad and depressed. I wish — not to change my way of feeling, but — I wish I were annihilated, I wish I had been so on that day when I ceased to be beloved. Ah ! 711071 Dieu, what a loss is mine ! My soul cannot accus- tom itself to that dreadful word 7iever; it still gives me con- vulsions. Yesterday, during the reading, I feared I should have to go away. I remembered that the last time that reading was given he was present; my heart was broken. I could not listen to another word, and since that moment I have existed only on those sweet and cruel memories. Moti ami, why did you wrench me from death ? The thought of 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 189 death is all that calms my soul ; it is its need, its most per- manent desire. Good-bye ; I know not how I can do it, but, to my great regret, I must control myself. The time in my life when I feel best is at night ; then I am all alone with my affections. You must tell me — if you know it — what you expect to do the next few days ; but in mercy make me no sacrifice. I am not worthy of it, and I should be left so unhappy. Saturday, 1774. Mon ami, you never know what you want to do ; I am therefore going to tell you : you will go out before eleven o'clock; you will pay %isits in the faubourg Saint -H onore ; then you will go and diue with Mme. de Boufitlers. Eeturn- ing from tliere, you will go and write at the house of Mme. de V . . . ; at seven o'clock you will come to the Com^die Frangaise to see " Henri IV." (which is the afterpiece) ; you will ask for the box of the Due d'Aumout, over the orchestra, next to the queen; you will tell your lacquey to be, at a quarter past eight, at the great gate of the Prince's court- yard, and we will all go out that way without losing a mo- ment ; after which you will go and sup with Mme. de . . . There is your whole day well laid out; change nothing. Then on Sunday you will work all the morning without going out; you will dine with ]\Inie. de . . . , return home at five to work again, and at eight you will come to me. Apply yovrsdf, and take my advice. Then Monday, dinner with ]\Ime.de V. . . , supyjer with Mme. de . . . ; Tuesday, dinner at M. Turgot's, and supper with Mme. de . . . ; Wednesday, dinner with Mme. Geoflfrin, and supper with Mme. de . . . ; Thursday, dinner with Comte de C . . . , and supper with Mme. de . . . ; Saturday, dinner with Mme. de . . . , go to Versailles after dinner, and return Sunday 190 LETTERS OF [1774 evening to spend it with me. Mon ami, you will be the most agreeable man in society if you do what is here pre- scribed to you. I defy you to make a better plan for your pleasure — I make that, as in duty bound, the first object. Mon ami, you tell me that you wish to make me suffer; that is impossible ; you are kind, you have feelings, and you know — what? that I would give my. life, more than that, I would vow myself to sorrow if I could thus deliver you from one quarter of an hour's pain. And yet you wish to make me suffer ' Oh, it is not true ! Five o'clock, 1774. Mon ami, you were mad this morning, but your madness was very charming because it was after my own heart. I do not know how I happened to forget to tell you the imperative reason that kept me at home. This surprises me the more as I did not remember imtil I saw M. de Vaines enter my room at half-past three o'clock. He had told me the evening before, and he had written it to me, yet I did not remember to tell you. Mon ami, I have annoyed you once, and you have hurt me a hundred times. For instance, if I do not see you to-night you will be cruel and unjust, but I shall not complain. M. Turgot is rather better; I have had news from him three times since I saw 3-ou, and I shall have more before midnight ; that satisfies me without tran- quillizing me. I have seen your Langon, the painter ; he is handsome enough to be painted himself ; but there is something silly, vapid, and conceited about him which cools me as to his talent. That man will never feel yom- soul ; he may paint your features, he may find the secret of rendering a likeness, but it will be without interest to me. And yet, how could that be? have I not in my heart that which would animate l?74i MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 191 stone and make canvas living ? Mon ami, I will not lose it ; you have promised me your portrait ; give it to me there- fore ; I want it. I have not been out ; 1 shall see no one who will tell me of the ball ; I shall hear M. Turgot talked of, not with the interest that I feel in him, but with that which is felt for virtue, and through fear of his successor. To me he is not the controller-general ; he is M. Turgot, with whom I have been intimate for seventeen years ; in that light his illness troubles and agitates my soul. Half-past ten o'clock, 1774. I have been with two women, coughing myself to death ; I could not thank you for sending me news of yourself. You do well, mon ami, to stay in your chimney-corner; your health and comfort are far dearer to me than my pleasure. I am sure you will accuse me of temper and injustice, and it is you who will be unjust ; but I forgive you. I have for you a sentiment which is the principle, and has the effects, of all the vii-tues, indulgence, kindness, generosity, confidence, the yielding up of self, the abnegation of personal interest. Yes, mon ami, I am all that when 1 think you love me ; but a doubt reverses my soul and puts me beside myself ; and what is cruel about it is that this is almost my habitual condition. Mon ami, the first rule for writing en 2'>oints is to form one's letters, and, above all, be precise ; hence you will never be able to write en points. But I will let 3^ou off easily in future. I feel only the need of being loved day by day ; let us blot from our dictionary the word forever. My soul can no longer attain so far. 1 am a hundred years old, and I have under lock and key a cure for the -future. You see 1 have read your points. But you, read these two pas- 192 LETTERS OF [1775 sages from Seneca ; they have delighted me. I wished you to see them, and I have had them copied. M. de Mora had the same sentiments ; they sustained him three years at the point of death, but death was stronger than love. Good- night. I feel sad ; life hurts me, and yet I love you with tenderness and passion. Eleven o'clock, 1775. I am alone only for a moment. For the last two hours I have been trying to finish that criticism of the Comte de La . . . For the last twelve days I have been swept away from all that interests me most iu life. Ah ! mon ami, how stupid dissipation is; how barren society is of all interest for a mind preoccupied ; how few conversations there are for which it is worth the trouble to leave home ! I am almost in a state of disgust w^ith intellect ; you say truly, that which enlightens only, wearies me. Ah ! I am very unfortunate ; what I love, what consoles me, puts my soul to the torture with trouble and remorse. I must have need to suffer, for I find myself constantly desiring that which does me harm. But, mon ami, it is only by thought that you can comprehend all this ; and I ought not to tell it to you ; in fact, I meant merely to ask you to return to me the volume of Montaigne which you put in your pocket a few days ago, I will go and fetch you before two o'clock : do not order a carriage. 3fon ami, there is something noble, righteous, honourable in submitting to ill-fortune. I know many rich men who go on foot for their pleasure ; and many old and infirm persons who go about in the street carriages. I am very limited myself, mon ami ; if you knew how much little details are to me, what the happiness that is bought with money would be to me ! Mon Dieu, my present situation proves that I have utterly disdained fortune ; it has no doubt its advantages, but how many things are preferable ! Good- 1775] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 193 night, mon ami. What are you doing at this moment? I defy you to be better employed than I ; I am thinking of what I love. Be ready before two o'clock. Midday, 1776. I was so chilled, so extinct last night because you came so late, and because I have seen you so little these many days, that I forgot to give you a copy of that letter of Mme. Geof- fiin which you desired. Nor did I tell you that you should have a ticket for that friend you do not choose to name to me. If you are amiable, and above all reasonable, this is how you will arrange your day to-morrow : dine at the Temple, and you will there see Mme. de Boufflers ; and at six o'clock you will either come liere or go to the Opera (I will let you know which). I am tempted not to go and dine with Comte de Creutz, though he is to have, or flatters himself he will have, M. Boucher. I admire the latter's talent with all my soul, but the use he makes of it wearies me — diamonds, gold, rainbows, all that does not touch the sensitive portion of my being ; a word from him whom I love, his slumber even, stirs more in me of that which feels and thinks than all M. Boucher's factitious images. Mon ami, I want to see you to-day ; come before supper. To-morrow I will let you know if I expect you at the Opera or here. Well, here is a settled thing: I will lend you no more manuscripts, inasmuch as you send them about ; I see there is no safety with you. But in spite of your defects, you still have confidence, as you told me yesterday, in being always sought, always loved, and by a thousand more than you could, or would respond to. Mon Dieu ! what a pity it is that, being so charming, you deserve so little to be loved ! Good-bye ; I am not stupid, but I am, perhaps, too truthful. I shall not 13 194 LETTERS OF [1775 go out to-day till nine at night. I will wager that you are roving already. There are but three things of which you do not know the value, and which you consequently fling about : your time, your talent, and your money — of all things else, you are miserly. Midday, 1775. " Unworthy and common " conduct would be to leave you to your anger and to the opini