1 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES SCHOOL OF LAW LIBRARY R.W.E.WH«TeHEAD, R. W. E. WHITEHEAD, THE MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS' LEGAL GUIDE; OR, THE LAWS RELATING TO THE MEDICAL PROFESSION. BY HUGH WEIGHTMAN, Esq., M.A. Cantab. BARRISTER-AT-LAW OF THE INNER TEMPLE, AND OP THB OXFORD CIRCUIT. HENRY RENSHAW, 356, STKAND, LONDON. 1870. LONDON : SAVILL, EDWARDS AND CO., PRINTERS, CHANDOS STREET, COVENT GARDEN. PREFACE. It is now forty years since the publication of Mr. Willcock's treatise on " The Laws relating to the Medical Profession," and although that work is still considered a high authority on questions as to which the law has effected no subsequent alteration, it is obvious that time alone must have rendered it as a book of reference practically obsolete. But it is not time only that has thus impaired its value, and as a cousetjf&ence its usefulness. Modern legislation has completely revolutionized the whole system upon which qualifications for the medical profession were based, or rather it has reduced into a system that which, until a very recent date, was but a confused body of chaotic matter. • The firit idea that naturally occurred to the author was the pro- duction of a new edition of the original work ; but, at a glance, it was evident, that such a mode of treating the subject was simply impossible. A very large portion of Mr. Willcock's treatise is occupied with matter which is no otherwise identical with the cognate subjects of the present day than in name. Cases, rules, and above all statutes, which were not in existence at the time when Mr. Willcock's work was published, to say nothing of the since exploded highly penal jurisdiction of the College of Physicians, have entirely changed the whole aspect of the pro- fession both inter se, as- well as inter alios. The intention there- fore of publishing a new edition of that book was speedily aban- doned; the author felt that it was impossible to do justice to the subject except by attempting an entirely new work. At the same time, it is only right for him to state that some of the abstract ideas contained in Mr. Willcock's treatise have afforded him much assis- tance, and from the same source much valuable information has been obtained and is hereby duly acknowledged. But the Medical V^/^^S' IV PKEFACE. Acts, the Lunacy Acts, the Sanitary Acts, the Copyright Acts, the Contagious and Infectious Diseases Acts, the Vaccination Acts, the Poor Law Acts, and even the Will Act, which have been passed since the date of the publication of Mr. Willcock's work, have precluded the author from availing himself of any practical materials, for his present purpose from that treatise, as, in point of fact, though a work of great merit at the time, it has been entirely submerged by the flood of subsequent legislation. That the subject of the laws relating to, and regulating the medical profession, is one of sufficient importance to justify a treatise, there cannot be a doubt. The rights, the liabilities, the duties, privileges, and immunities, the legal, as well as moral responsibility involved in connexion with the pursuit of the pro- fession, in all and any of its branches, are based, as indeed they ever have been, upon principles which modern legislation has en- deavoured to define for the public weal, and not as is sometimes alleged upon mere abstract, arbitrary rules,^he ofl"3pring of super- stition, intolerance, and ignorance. An endeavour has been accord- ingly made to obtain for this work at least a character for consis- tency, by keeping general principles in view, and that without trenching on the domain of medical science, or affecting a know- ledge to which the author makes no pretensions, his sole aim and object being to furnish the medical practitioner, no matter what his grade, or in what department of the noble art he may practise, a ready means of ascertaining and asserting his own status, and of accurately apprehending his rights, privileges, duties, liabilities, and responsibilities, as recognised, defined, protected, and jealously guarded by the laws of the land. It is hoped that such a work may be also found useful to mem- bers of the legal profession, when applied to for advice in difficul- ties arising out of medical practice, or incidentally resulting from such professional avocations. Coroners, clerks to magistrates, to boards of guardians, or those whose duty it is to administer the laws relating to lunacy or the public health, medical officers generally, and even higher func- tionaries, it is believed will find in this publication that information ready at hand which it is not at all times easy to condense, and which, through a difficulty in acquiring the materials alone, cannot always be obtained when required. PREFACE. V The book is now presented to the medical profession as con- taining the law on the subject of which it treats, as it exists at the present time, and though not primarily intended for the higher branch of the legal profession, a hope is entertained that even in that sphere it may not be found wholly valueless, and may meet with a favourable reception. The author would not think it necessary to refer to either the novelty or the difficulty of the task involved in the preparation of the work, were it not that he desires to acknowledge the original idea as most kindly emanating from Dr. Druitt, one of the officers of health of the parish of St. George, Hanover Square, to whom he is also indebted for some very valuable suggestions ; and he also is anxious to record that the chapters on " Medical Ethics," and " Joint Medical Education," have been carefully revised by an eminent member of the medical profession, to whom he takes this opportunity of returning his heartfelt thanks ; Mr. Clarke, M.E.C.S., of 23, Gerrard Street, Soho, must also be included in the number of those medical friends to whom the author's thanks are due. In the event of any further legislation aifecting the medical profession during the present Session of Parliament, such will be published by way of a supplement, and may be obtained gratis by all previous purchasers of the present work, upon application to the publisher. Hugh Weightman. 5, King's Bench Walk, Temple. May, 1870. CONTENTS OF THE WORK. Intboduction. Chap. I. Ancienx Orders of tue Medical Profession. „ II. Modern Orders of the Medical Profession ; or those ENTITLED TO BE REGISTERED UNDER THE MeDICAL AcT (1S58). „ III. Rights, Privileges, and Immunities of duly registered Medical Praciitioners. Summary of the different Qualifications entitling their Possessors to recover at Law their Fees according to their respective Qualifications. General Observations. „ IV. Of the Liabilities of legally qualified Medical Practi- tioners, and tue Disabilities of unregistered Practi- tioners. Also the Malpractice of both qualified and unqualified Persons. V. Character — Defamation. , VI. Law of Copyright, especially as applied to Writings and Lectures of Medical Men. , VII. Schools of Anatomy. , VIII. Law of Partnership as affecting the Medical Profession. , IX, The Law of Life Assurance as affecting the Medical Profession. , X. The Public Health (Common and Statdte Law.) Contagious and Infectious Diseases. "Vaccination. 6 VIU CONTENTS OF THE WORK. Chap. XL The Law relating to Idiots, Lunatics, ok Peksoxs of Un- sound Mind and Incapable of Managing theib own Affaies, as also the Nature and Degree of Insanity which will relieve a Person from the Penal Conse- quences OF Crime. „ XII. Coroners* Inquests. ,, XIII. Registration of Births, Deaths, and Marriages. „ XIV. Poor Law Legislation as affecting Medical Practitioners. Pauper Lunatics, including Criminals and Prisoneks for Debt. „ XV. Chemists, Druggists, and Dentists. „ XVI. Medical Ethics, and Medical Education. Supplementary Chapter. — On Title of Doctor of Medicine, ob Doctor of Physic. Appendix. TABLE OF CONTENTS. CHAPTER I. Ancient Orders of the Medical Profession — The Antiquity of the Art of healing — Hippocrates — his voluminous Writings — his personal Character — and his Pharmacopceia — Galen — his Writings — the Basis for Compilers of Medical Works — Translated into ^\j-abic — these Works introduced into England at the Time of the Christian Mission under Pope Gregory the Great — The Monks and secular Clergy at first the only regular Medical Practitioners — Interference with the Medical Practice of the Monks by the Oecree of the Council of Tours (a.d. 1163)— Clerical Medical Men— The Kev. W. Clark, M.D.. F.RS., F.R.C.P., Professor of Anatomy at University of Cambridge — 'J'liree Regular and many Irregular Orders of the Medical Profession— Celebrated llegulations of the Col- lege of Salerno — First attempted Interference with Women practising Physic — The Act, the Foundation of all Statute Law regulating the Practice of Physic - — Establishment of the College of Physicians, London — The Knights Hospi- tallers, and the Order of St. Lazarus — The Barbers' Company — Barber- surgeons — Apothecaries or Grocers — Empirics — Jews — Female Medical Practitioners — Touching for the King's Evil pp. 1 — 14 CHAPTER II. Modern Orders of the Medical Profession ; or those entitled to be Eegistered under the Medical Act (1858) — Royal College of Physicians, London — History of the College — Eligibility for its Fellowships — The College of Physicians, Edinburgh — King and Queen's College of Physicians, Irehind — College of Surgeons of England — College of Surgeons of Edinburgh — The Faculty of Physicians and Surgeons of Glasgow — The College of Surgeons, Ireland — Society of Apothe- caries, London — Apothecaries' Hall, Dublin — Universities — Doctor by Doctorate — Doctors of Foreign and Colonial Universities or Colleges — Person practising Medicine before August, 1815 pp. 15 — 28 CHAPTER III. Rights, Privileges, and Immunities of duly- registered Medical Practitioners — Right such to recover their Fees, and what Fees, whether in Medicine, Surgery, Pharmacy, or Midwifery — Summary of the above — General Observations pp. 29-35 TABLE OF CONTENTS. CHAPTER IV. Sectioh I. — Of the Liabilities of legally qualified Medical Practitioners, and the Disabilities of unregistered Practitioners — Unregistered Persons not entitled to the Expenses of Medical Witnesses, nor to make post-mortem Examinations — Appeal from a Conviction for assuming the Title of Doctor of Medicine pp. 36—37 Section II. — Malapraxis — Negligence — Civil Liability of Medical Practitioner not terminated with the Death of the Patient — Doctrine of legal Malice — Ignorance — Competent Skill — Culpable Want of Skill — Improper Use of the Vedis or Lever — A Person negligently supplying a wrong Drug, in consequence of which Death ensues, he is thereby guilty of Manslaugiiter pp. 37 — 42 CHAPTER V. Character — Defamation — Maliciously imputing to a Medical Practitioner a want of Qualification, Attention, Skill, or Capacit}' — Distinction between Slander and Libel — For Libel two Remedies are given— Maliceexpressed and implied— Falsity of the Imputation — Consequence of the Slander — Cases in which no special Damage need be proved, and why — By what other Means than by Writing a Libel may be expressed — Motives under which a public Officer acts in doing a Duty incumbent upon him do not make his Conduct Actionable — Challenging public Criticism by Advertisements — Privileged Occasion — Publication, what amounts to — Justification in a Civil Action and in a Criminal Proceeding — Repeating a Libel to another — Selling Copies — Privileged Communications-^— Trials for Libel or Slander in the County Courts ...... pp. 43 — 52 CHAPTER VI. Law of Copyright as applicable to the Writings and Lectures of Medical Men — Copyright before Publication — The Right of an Author or Proprietor of a Manu- script to its first Publication — Power of the Court of Chancery to restrain the Publication of Medical Lectures delivered orally — Right to restrain the Publi- cation not only of Etchings and Photographs, but also of a descriptive Catalogue of them — No Copyright before Publication allowed in a Work of an immoral or irreligious Character — Copyright after Publication — How far it is now ex tended — Lectures delivered in any University, Public School, and some other Places are • not protected — What amounts to an Infringement of Copyright — International Copyright, and the Acts and Conventions relating thereto — The different Coun- tries with which International Copyright has been arranged — Copyright in a foreign Print, and our own Engraving Acts — Copyright in the Pharmaco- poeia pp. 53—62 CHAPTER VII. Sciiools of Anatomy — The Act regulating them — What led to this Enactment — Burke and Hare — Stealing J^hrouds from a dead Body — Resurrectionists — Disinterring a Body an indictable Offence — Selling the dead Body of a Felon for the Purpose of Dissection, where Dissection formed no Part of the Sen- tence, a Misdemeanour at Common Law — Penalties under the Anatomy Act — Actions of Trespass for violating Graves or Burial Grounds, maintainable by whom . pp. 63 — 67 TABLE OF CONTENTS. CHAPTER VITI. Law of Partnership as affecting the Medical Profession — What Agreement amounts to a Piiitnersliip — Between an outgoing and incoming Surgeon — A common Stock or Plant not essential to constitute a Partnersliip — One Partner finding Property and another Skill — One Partner indemnifying others against Loss — Partners in fafnro, as between Master and Pupil, or Principal and Assistant — Partnerships between qualified and unqualified Medical Practitioners — Appeal from a summary Conviction under the J'en:d Clause of the Medical Act, the Appellant's Name not being found in the Medical Register coupled with other Cir- cumstances — Autliorily of each Partner to hire or discharge Servants, Clerks, or Assistants, engaged in the Business — What (Jlass of Servants are entitled to more than a Month's \Varning,ora Month's Wages— Yearly Hirings when deter- mined — A Master has no Right to dismiss an Apprentice merely because he mis- behaves, except real Danger was by his Misconduct occasioned to his Master's Business — How far Clerks, Assistants, &c. remunerated by a percentage on their Earnings are to be reganled as Partners — A Partnership though not inter sc, yet may exist quoad third Persons — A Master justified in dismissing a Clerk or an Assistant for claiming to be a Partner— Partnership Contract need not be in Writing — A quasi Partnership — In some Cases, under the Statute of Frauds, Agreement /rtUii be in Writing pp. 68 — 77 CHAPTER IX. The Law of Life Assurance as affecting the Medical Profession — Medical Refe- rees — The most perfect bona fides must be observed — Wilfully false Statements made by the Medical Keferee, or any Collusion with the Proposer, although the Referee may have no Interest in the Contract, render him liable to an Action — Claim of Medical Referees against Insurance OflBce for a Fee for their Certificates — Cases decided. on the Subject — The ordinary Medical Adviser — The Meaning of the Term "usual ISIedical Attendant" — Need the "usual Medical Attendant " be a regular qualified Practitioner ? — What constitutes moral Fraud and legal Fraud- -What amounts to a wilful Suppression of the Fact of other Offices having been applied to and refused the Life — W'hat Evidence of the " usual Medical Attendant " will be sufficient to rebut the Imputation of Fraud in not having disclosed that the Deceased was of a Consumptive Family pp. 78—81 CHAPTER X. Section I. — The Public Health (Common and Statute Law) — Contagious and Infectious Diseases — The ancient Writ of '' I)e leproso amovendo" — The ex- posing a Child infected with Small-jiox in a Public Way a Misdemeanour at Common Law — The I'Ligue — Inoculating for the Sinall-pox — The "Nuisance Removal Acts" and the "Diseases Prevention Acts" — "Sanitary Acts." " Workshops Regulation Act," and " Factory Acts" epitomized and ex- plained pp. 82 — 88 Section II. — The "Contagious Diseases Acts" abstracted and epitomized pp. 88—90 Section III. — The "Vaccination Acta" — Effect and Operation — Appeals from Summary Convictions under them pp. 90 — S'2 Ml TABLE OF CONTENTS. CHAPTER XL The Law relating to Idiots, Lunatics, or Persons of Unsound Mind, and incapable of managing their own Affiiirs ; as also the Nature and Degree of Insanity which will relieve a Person from the Penal Consequences of Ctime — Medical Certificates generally — Townley's Case — Provisions of Lunacy Acts — Form of Medical Certificate in the Case of Private Persons (not Paupers) — Evidence of Medical Witnesses in open Court — The Nature of Insanity recognised by Law — McNaugiiten's Case — Answers of the Judges to the House of Lords — Feigned Insanity— Juries in Criminal Cases— Civil Cases — Certificate of Medical Man, accompanied by Affidavit, for the Issue of a Commission " De lunatico inquirendo," or for furnishing Information to the Lord Chancellor — Meaning of the Term "Unsound Mind" — Case of VV. F. Windham — Legal Definition of the Word "Lunatic" — Habitual Drunkenness — Medical Men wit- nessing or drawing-up the Wills of Patients — A Will made by Lunatic during a Lucid Interval — Fraud and Imposition upon Weakness of Mind — Will in favour of a Medical Attendant in whose House the Testator resided — Judgment of Sir W. Wynn as to the Effect of an Inquisition of Lunacy — Nature of Wills — Memorandum of Form of Attestation — A Person not Insane may yet be incompetent to make a Will — Devise, Legacy, or beneficial Interest given by a Will to the attesting Witness of it, or to the Wife or Husband of such Witness — Further Consideration of the Lunacy Statutes — Liability of a Medical Man at the Suit of a Private Person confined un 31 Geo. III., c. 34 39 & 40 Geo. III., c. 94 48 Geo. III., c. 96 55 Geo. III., c. 194 6 Geo. IV., c. 78 . 9 Geo. IV., c. 40 2& 3 Wm. IV., c. 75 3 & 4 Wm. IV., c. 103, ss. 11, 1 5 & 6 Win. IV., c. 65, ss. 4, 5 5 & 6 Wm, IV., c. 76 6 & 7 Wm. IV., c. 86 6 & 7 Wm. IV., c. 89, ss. 1, 3, 5 1 Vict., c. 26, s. 9 1 Vict., c. 68, s. 2 1 & 2 Vict., c. 14, 1 & 2 Vict., c. 49 1 & 2 Vict., 0. 59 3 & 4 Vict., c. 29 3 & 4 Vict., c. 54 4 & 5 Vict 5 & 6 Vict , c. 5 & 6 Vict., c 5 & 6 Vict., c b & 7 Vict., c 6 & 7 Vict., c 7 & 8 Vict., c 32, s. 29 45. ss. 17, 23 26 96, ss. 2, 6 V2, ss. 2, 8, 11 . 7 & 8 Vict.,' c. 15, ss. 8, 10, 11. 12, 13, 22, 53 8 & 9 Vict., c. 29 8& 9 Vict., c. 126 8 & 9 Vict.,c. 100,83.3,23,43, 50, 54,55, 56, 57,59 9 & 10 Vict., c. 66, a. 6 9 & 10 Vict., c. 93, ss. 1, 2 10 & 11 Vict., c. 29 . 13 & 14 Vict., c. 54 . 15 & 16 Vict, c. 12, ss. 1, 9, 18 15 & 16 Vict., c. 24 . 15 & 16 Vict., c. 56 . 16 & 17 Vict., c. 70 . 10 & 17 Vict., c. 96, ss. 7, 10, 11, 12, 13, 19, 2u 60 . 114 . 114 . 114 7, 9. 16, 18 9 15, 16, 18, 154,155 15, 18, 34, 146 . 66 . 83 76, 77 . 56 . 83 . 66 23, 24 . 25 . 141 . 135 . 25 . 83 . 135 63, 67 86, 88 56, 57 . 125 . I:i6 36. 115, 116 105,106,107 116 95 128 59 90 94, 140, 141 90, 132 . 137 137, 138 56, 61 . 138 49, 52 59, 60, 61 86, 87, 88 . 88 . 136 107, 108,110,111,112 . 131 . 33 . 88 8S 60, 61 . 106 143, 144 . 101,103,108 97, 110, 112, 136 XVlll STATUTES REFERRED TO. 16 & 17 Vict., c. 97, ss. 7, Q6, 67, 68, 69, 70 16 & 17 Vict., c. 100 . 16 & 17 Vict., c. 104 . 17 & 18 Vict., c. 114 . 19 & 20 Vict., c. 108, s. 23 21 & 22 Vict., c. 90, ss. 17, 26, 30, 31, ( 32, 34, 35, 3tj, 37, 40, 47, 48, 54, 55 ( 22 Vict., c. 21, s. 6 . 23 Vict., c. 7, s. 45 . 23 & 24 Vict., c. 66 . 23 & 24 Vict., c. 75, ss. 14, 15 23 & 24 Vict, c. 77 . 23 & 24 Vict., c. 86, ss. 2, 12 23 & 24 Vict., c. 116, s. 6 . 24 & 25 Vict., 0. 134 25 & 26 Vict., 0. 91, s. 2 . 25 & 26 Vict., 0. Ill, ss. 21, 22, 24, 27, 47 27 & 28 Vict., c. 29, ss. 2, 3 27 & 28 Vict., c. 48, s. 6 . 27 & 28 Vict., c. 119, s. 75 29 & 30 Vict., c. 35, s. 15 29 & 30 Vict., c. 90, ss. 15, 22, 28, 37 30 & 31 Vict., c. 84, ss. 18, 31, 32 30 & 31 Vict., c. 142, ss. 5, 10 . 30 & 31 Vict., c. 146 31 fr 32 Vict., c. 115 31 & 32 Vict., c. 116, s. 1 . 31 &32 Vict.,c. 121, ss. 3, 18 32 & 33 Vict., c. 96, s. 7 . 33 Vict., 0. 117, ss. 1—15 PAGB , 73, 75, 76, 79, 87, 122 . 95, 96, 97, 112 90, 92 . 26 . 51 \ 15, 17, 23, 27, 29, 30, \ 31, 35, 36, 70, 85, 146 16, 31 ,35 16 . 138 84 102, 103 125 139 62, 146 96, 97, 133 140, 141 88 141, 142 88 84, 85, 116 9C , 92 51 86 85 69 143, 144 8£ >, 90 143, 144 STATUTES PRINTED IN EXTENSO IN THE APPENDIX, 6 & 7 Wm. IV., c. 89, Medical Witnesses at Coroners' Inquests . . 166 7 Wm. IV., and 1 Vict., c. 68, Coroners' Inquests . 168 8 & 9 Vict., c. 100, Lunacy . 170 16 & 17 Vict., c. 96, „ . 211 16 & 17 Vict., c. 97, „ . 224 18 & 19 Vict., c. 105, . 281 19 & 20 Vict., c. 87, „ . 280 25 & 26 Vict., 0. 86, ,, . 286 25 & 26 Vict., c. ni, ,, . 292 15 & 16 Vict., c. 56, Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Chemists Acts . . 305 31 & 32 Vict., c. 121, ,, „ „ . 309 16 & 17 Vict., c. 100, Vaccination Acts . 317 30 & 31 Vict., c. 84, „ . 321 29 & 30 Vict., c. 35, Contagious Diseases Acts . . . . . . 330 32 & 33 Vict., c. 96, „ ,,„.... . 345 18 & 19 Vict., c. 116, Public Health Acts . 355 18 & 19 Vict., c. 121, „ „ . 357 23 & 24 Vict., c. 77, „ „ . 376 29 & 30 Vict., c. 90, „ ,, . 380 21 & 22 Vict., c. 90, Medical Acts . 397 22 Vict., c. 21, „ . 408 23 Vict., c. 7, ,, ....... . 409 23 & 24 Vict., c. 66, ,, . 411 31 & 32 Vict., c. 29, „ . 413 INTRODUCTION. This work is based for the most part on the Medical Acts (21 & 22 Vict., c. 90 ; 22 Vict., c. 21 ; 23 Vict., c. 7 ; 23 & 24 Vict., c. 66 ; and 31 & 32 Vict., c. 29), but many other Acts of Parliament, such as those relating to Anatomy, Copyright, the Public Health, Lunacy and Insanity, Vaccination, the Poor Laws, Medical Witnesses, and other subjects incidental to the guidance of the medical practitioner in the discharge of his duties, both public and private, are referred to, abstracted, or epitomized, according to their relative importance or bearing upon the main object of this treatise. That object is to furnish the medical practitioner with a compendious and ready means of apprehending the nature of his duties and responsibilities in relation to the laws of the land, and of referring to the autho- rities which have decided disputed cases, explained and expounded apparently inconsistent or ambiguous enactments, and have thus pioneered the way, possibly for further improvements, in the organi- zation of the profession, or in the protection, remuneration, and security legally furnished to the individual practitioner. All the Acts of practical utility will be found in the Appendix, a list of which is prefixed. The substance of most of the cases cited is given in an abstract form, as the reports containing them might not be accessible to the general reader. At the same time a table of cases is also added, and in the rcmai'ks and conclusions made or arrived at by the author, he trusts to be acquitted of presumption, as they are principally founded upon observations and opinions expressed by those who are entitled to the utmost deference and respect. In perusing this work it will be necessary for the general reader to bear in mind that the term " unqualified" person, medical man, or practitioner, is used as distinct from " unregistered," as, although the Medical Act of 1858, in defining the term " legally qualified XX INTRODUCTION. medical practitioner," or " duly qualified medical practitioner," or " any words importing a person recognised by law as a medical practitioner or member of" the medical profession," construes such to mean " a person registered uuder that Act," such construction only applies " when" such words are " used in any Act of Parlia- ment^'' (s. 34). A person may be " qualified," though not in the above sense " legally" or " duly" qualified as a medical practitioner. He may labour under many disabilities through want of registration, as will be seen in the course of this work, but he cannot, in such case, be proceeded against for penalties as if he had no qualification whatever, much less can he be said to be '* wilfully and falsely pretending to be, or taking or using the name or title of a physician," &c., " implying that he is registered under the Act," within the meaning of the penal section (40). For instance, an unregistered Fellow, Member, or Licentiate of the College of Physicians could not be proceeded against by that or any other body for practising physic, so long as he did so within the terms prescribed by his licence or the reasonable bye-laws of the College ; and the same remark applies to Fellows and Members of the College of Surgeons practising surgery though not registered, and also to the Licentiates of the Apothecaries' Society practising physic under their licences, and indeed to all practising under the authority of any licensing corporation and not infringing the privileges of others, although, not " registered." In a word, an " unqualified " person is a person not possessing any qualification for registration, whereas a person may possess every professional qualification for registration, but yet for want of such registration he would not be a " legally qualified medical practitioner " in the sense in which such words "are used in any Act of Parliament," unless he were also "registered." In the list of qualifications, mentioned in Schedule (A) of the Act, there is no reference made to "Members" of any college of physi- cians, but that omission, which is simply explained by the fact that at the time of the passing of the Act, " Members " had not then been created as distinct from " Licentiates," is supplied by the 22 Vict., c. 21, 8. 4, which enacts that the term " Member" shall be added after the term "Fellow" to the qualifications described in the first and second heads of Schedule A. Those columns, with that addition, therefore; now read thus : — INTRODUCTION. XXI 1. Fellow, Member, Licentiate, or Extra- Licentiate of the Royal Cullege of Physicians of London. 2. Fellow, Member, or Licentiate of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh. The word or term " Member" is directed to be in addition to, not in substitution of, any other qualification described in those two heads. And by the 23 Vict., c. 7, s. 1, Licentiates in Surgery of any university in Ireland, legally authorized to grant such licences, are put upon the same footing as respects registration as is prescribed in the Schedule of the first Medical Act in respect of the registration of any Master in Surgery of any university of the United Kingdom. In referring to that Schedule the reader will be pleased to remember these " additions." A further Act of the 23 & 24) Vict., c. 6G, provides that in any new charter which shall be granted to the Royal College of Physicians of London or of Edinburgh, or to the King and Queen's College of Physicians in Ireland, nothing shall in any way aflect the rights, powers, authorities, qualifications, liberties, exemptions, immunities, duties, and obligations granted, conferred, or imposed upon suoli corporations respectively, but so much of the Act of the 14 & 15 Henry VIII., c. 5, as relates to the Elects of the Royal College of Physicians of London, and their powers and functions, is declared to be repealed, and their office and name from the date of that Act (18G0) are wholly to cease and determine, it being recited in the pre.iuible that " the main function of the Elects — viz., that of examining and granting letters testimonial in accordance with the provisions " of the Act of Henry VIII., ibrbidding any person " to practise in physic through England until he be examined by the President and three of the said Elects, and have from them letters testimonial," had " been virtually super- seded by the Medical Act, and that the Elects have ceased to grant letters testimonial in accordance with the provisions contained in the statute of Henry VIII., and it is therefore expedient that these provisions should be repealed." It is of course provided that such repeal shall not affect the rights of those already possessing such tes- timonials, and all trusts to be executed by the Elects are thenceforth to vest in and be executed by the Censors of the College. As also by the Medical Act (1858), if the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh, and the Faculty of Piiysiciaus and Surgeons of Glasgow, agree to amalgamate so as to form one united corporation under the XXll INTRODUCTION. name of the " Eoyal College of Surgeons of Scotland," her Majesty is empowered to grant them such new charter or charters as may be necessary for effecting that union, such changes might still further create confusion, except they were borne in mind when a reference is made to Schedule A of the original Act. With these few ex- planatory remarks, and remembering that the first three Acts are directed to " be construed together as one Act," and that the last Act on this subject relates entirely to the Colonies, the term " colony," however, not to include the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man, it is sufficient to say that the Medical Act of 1858 will in this work be spoken of generally as The Medical Act, and some- times as The Medical Act (1858), or The ^e;^, and the others, when specially referred to, will be particularized according to their respective descriptions. H. W. 5, King's Bench Walk, Temple. THE LAWS RELATING TO THE MEDICAL PROFESSION. CHAPTEE I. ANCIENT OEDEES OE THE MEDICAL PEOFESSION. The antiquity of the art of healing, as embodied in the science of medicine, and reduced to principles which have ever since, more or less, regulated its practice, can at least be traced to the time of Hippocrates, the second of that name, who was born about the first year of the eighteenth Olympiad — ^that is, e.g. 4G0, or 2330 years ago. He was, in many respects, the most celebrated physician of ancient or modern times, and, probably from a belief that no mere mortal could possess the powers and skill which he undoubtedly evinced, a divine origin was attributed to him, and according to his genealogy given by John Tzetzes, with a minute particularity worthy of Sir Bernard Burke himself, he was seventeenth (though, according to Soranus, nineteenth) in descent from ^Esculapius, and tlirough his mother, whose name was Phaernaiete, was even said to be a descendant of Hercules. Without vouching for the truthfulness of this pedigree, the Divine art may well be supposed to have, at least in some sense, a Divine origm. Hippocrates was born in the isle of Cos, where his birthday was celebrated with sacrifices on the 26th day of the month of Agrianus. He was instructed in medical science by his father, Heraeleides, and by Herodiciis, and was also said to have been a pupil of Gorgias of Leontini, and after practising his profession at home died at Larissa, in Thessaly, about the year b.c. 357, in which case he must have been 103 years of age. His ancestors had practised medicine for probably a century previous, and liis two sons Thessalus and Dracon, and a son-in-law, Polybus, followed the same profession, and ai-e supposed to have been the authors of some of the works in the Hip- pocratic collection. These facts tend to explain the ponderous and £ 2 ANCIENT OEDERS OF THE MEDICAL PROFESSION. voluminous collection of writings under the above title, of "whicli it may be safely asserted that it is quite impossible any one man could have written all thus collected under his name. It appears from different parts of this collection that by far the greater proportion of the several hundred substances used medicinally by him belong to the vegetable kingdom. His personal character seems to have been that of a pattern physician, entertaining, as he evidently did, a keen sense of the moral responsibilities and obligations of his pro- fession, and throughout his writings his endeavour is to impress upon his readers the duties of care, attention, and kindness towards the sick ; and some of his moral reflections and apophthegms have ac- quired quite a proverbial notoriety (as for example " Life is short, and art is long"). This is not the place, however, for a biographical sketch even of so celebrated a character ; and even an allusion to his vegetable pharmacopoeia is only made to remind the reader that, in an age when chemical science had not as yet emerged from its very germ, the simple process of this great man consisted chiefly in watching the operations of nature, and in more accurately discovering the properties of the vegetable kingdom with a view to applying them to the alleviation of human maladies. Not, however, confining himself to this knowledge, in which the most savage state of society can to some extent participate, in surgery he is the author of the frequently-quoted maxim that " "What cannot be cured by medicine is cured by the knife ; and what cannot be cured by the knife is cured by fire." Galen, who was born about a.d. 130, ranks next among the medical sages of antiquity, and though his admirers have not gone the length with those of Hippocrates of assigning to him a Divine genealogy, he himself is often devoutly lavish in the praises of his father Jsicon, not only for his knowledge of astronomy, grammar, arithmetic, and various other branches of philosophy, but also for his patience, justice, benevolence, and virtue. But even Galen was not above claiming special revelations from the gods. He on one occa- sion pleaded to the emperor, M. Aurelius, that it was the will of ^sculapius that he should be left at Eome instead of following the fortunes of the imperial warfare on the Danube, and whether he believed or invented the idea of a vision from the god on this occa- sion, it is certain that he more than once mentions his receiving ■what he conceived to be Divine communications during sleep, in cases where no personal object can be discovered. Eome was henceforth the great theatre of Galen's success, and aff"orded, under imperial patronage, an advantageous field for his great learning and abilities. Here he had opportunities of witness- ANCIENT ORDERS OF THE MEDICAL PROFESSION. 3 ing the development of Christian practice, if not of doctrine, in the early period of the history of that faith, and in one of his works he speaks of the Christians in tlie liighest terms, praising their tempe- rance and chastity, their blameless lives and love of virtue, in which, as he says, they equalled or surpassed the philosophers of the age. The works of Galen (Kiihn's edition) extend to twenty-one volumes, and embrace the subjects of Anatomy and Physiology, Dietetics and Hygiene, Pathology, Diagnosis and Semeiology, Phar- macy, Materia Medica, Therapeutics — ^including Surgery, Commen- taries on Hippocrates, and various miscellaneous and philosophical works, so that it would appear medical science was not even at that now remote period, based upon mere superstition, nor yet is it to any considerable extent found appealing, for lack of human knowledge, to supernatural power, charms, incantations, sorcery, or witchcraft. To the compilers, both among the Greeks and the Komans, of medi- cal works, like Aetius and Oribnsius, Galen's works formed the basis ; while, as soon as they had been translated into Arabic, in the ninth century, chiefly by Honain Ben Ishak, they were at once adopted throughout the East as the standard of medical perfection. Opinions difter as to the value aflorded by the Arabic writers in explanation and illustration of Galen's works. These Arabic writings, though extant in various European libraries, have never yet been published ; although an immense number of European writers have from time to time edited, translated, or illustrated Galen's works, but, unfortunately, no critical edition of Galen's works in the original has been undertaken, the existing commentaries and abridgments having been made from Latin translations of the Arabic, itself a translation from the Greek, aboundiuir with inter- polations undistinguished from the original text. Thus, to a great extent, the writings of Galen became obscured, and in a measure vitiated, by new commentaries, which were, for the most part, mere sophistical speculations founded on Aristotelian logic. These reminiscences should teach us to deal leniently witli the failings of the ancients, remembering that in science, art, and litera- ture, much that was valuable has been lost or obscured, and that Greece, Eome, Egypt, Arabia, and Assyria, of old, were perhaps more advanced in civilization, which goes hand in hand with science in all its branches, than can now be strictly proved, or than we are in candour prepared to admit. AVithout entering upon the controversy relating to the introduction of Christianity into Britain, it may with safety be affirmed that its organization into a regular system in this country by Pope Gregory the Great, brought into England b2 4 ANCIENT ORDEES OF THE MEDICAL PROFESSION. many of the Roman writings, and among others the valuable medical works of Galen. For these the monastic libraries at once afforded a repository, and at the same time thus furnished food to the monastic craving for learning, which, whether sacred or pro- fane, found favour in these institutions ; and it would, indeed, be a monstrous moral contradiction that the monastery that produced a Bede should have been indifferent to the cultivation of a science which from the time of the founder of Christianity had gone hand in hand with its sublime code of humanity, in healing the sick, cleansing the leper, restoring sight to the blind, making the lame to walk, and even in the case of recovery from suspended animation, to all ap- pearance raising the dead. On the institution of the Universities, medicine necessarily became an object of considerable importance. In the middle of the seventh century was founded the medical school at Salerno, an institution soon followed by similar semina- •ies throughout Europe, and the degree of " Medicus" seems to have been known at Oxford soon after the Conquest (Exon. Domesday Book, 5), and in the fourteenth century the degree of doctor of physic was by no means uncommon. (See "Wood's Hist, of Ox- ford, vol. ii. p. 18. Gutch, vol. ii. p. 765). The monks, and even the secular clergy, were necessarily the only regular phy- sicians and surgeons, as none but the clergy paid the slightest at- tention to learning — or rather, it might be said, that almost all the learned of that day went into holy orders, and the Latin being the language of the Catholic Church, was assiduously cultivated, so that all books, even on philosophy and science, were written in it. The doctors of that day, as has been just now remarked, were for the most part monks, who seem to have practised physic in all its branches, both prescribing and administering medicine, and perform- ing the operative parts of surgery. Various canons, such as those of the Council of Eheims (a.d. 1131) and the Council of Laterau (a.d. 1139) were passed to regulate this practice, until at length at the Council of Tours (a.d. 11U3) it was decreed that none of the regular clergy should leave their monastery for the purpose of de- voting themselves to this practice. The words of the canon on that point are as follows : — " Inde nimirum est quod se in angelum \icis more solito trausfigurans, sub obtentu languentium fratrum consulendi corporibus et ecclesiastica negotia fidelius pertractandi, regulares quosdam ad legendas leges et confectiones ]j)}i\jsicales pon- derandas de claustris suis educit .... statuimus ut nullus omnino post votum religionis, post factum in aliquo religioso loco profes- sionem, ad physicam legesve mundanas legendas permittatur exire." This canon is couched in terms of great respect towards the persons against whom it was aimed, for at the same time that they are for- bidden to undertake duties incompatible with their spiritual charac- ANCIENT ORDERS OF THE MEDICAL PROFESSION. 5 ter as wliolly devoted to certain religious occupations, they are com- plimented as being the most worthy members of their profession, and actuated by the best feelings of human nature— viz., a desire to alleviate the sufferings of their brethren. The canon, however, was only directed against the regular or monastic clergy, and not against the secular clergy, who were not bound by any special vows of obligation to monastic rule. From this time the monks confined themselves to the prescribing of medicines, to be compounded and administered by others, and wholly abstained from the manual operations of surgery ; but the secular clergy continued to practise physic in all its branches as before, without any interference. It appears that about this time Eichard Fitz-Nigel, who died Bishop of Loudon, had been apothecary to Ilenry II. (Aug. Sacra, t. i. p. 304.) But even in the present day there arc two members of the Epis- copacy—viz., Dr. Bickersteth, Bishop of Eipon, and Dr. McDougall, retired Bishop of Labuan, who, having been originally members of the medical profession, have, since their elevation to the Episcopal Bench, been elected, and still remain. Fellows of the College of Surgeons of England. Before quitting the subject of clerical medical practitioners it is perhaps only due to the memory of one of the last clerical-physicians of the present day to say that the University of Cambridge has but recently lost one of its most dis- tinguished members in the person of the llev. W. Clark, M.D., F.li.S. and F.ll.C.P., who in the year 1S08 was seventh wrangler, and afterwards became Professor of Anatomy at the University, and indeed to whom the University is indebted for the greater part of its present anatomical collection, and almost for the formation, and certainly for the arrangement, of the anatomical museum. Dr. Clark, who was elected a ftsllow of Trinity College, was in the year 182G presented by that College to the rectory of Guiseley, near Leeds, which preferment he held for thirty-three years, and during the whole of that time he also occupied the chair of Anatomy at Cam- bridge, having held the latter appointment for a period of no less than forty-nine years, viz., from the year 1817 to 1866. It is be- lieved that at one time he also combined the private practice of a physician, but this was probably before he obtained preferment in the Church. The case is somewhat curious, both as evidencing the legal right even in the present day to pursue at the same time the two professions, and as illustrative of the varied qualifications and attainments that may be centred in one individual, as we certainly have here an instance of mathematical, anatomical, medical, and general scientific acquirements, united in the same person, and sub- sidiary perhaps, only to theological and divinity scholarship. Nor need such an one be one whit the less an efficient clergyman because 6 ANCIENT ORDERS OF THE MEDICAL PROFESSION. he has profoundly studied human and comparative anatomy, to say nothing of physiology, the structure, disposition, functions, and development of the organs of the human body, the masterpiece of the works of the Creator. The effect of the canons on the subject of physic, hovrever, was to create a distinction of orders, and hence arose a division among the duties of medical practitioners. The department of surgery fell by degrees into the hands of barbers and smiths, who had hitherto been employed as assistants in surgical operations, and from this time there grew up three regular, and unfortunately many irregular, orders of the medical profession, which may be distributed thus : — Eirst, the scholars ; secondly, the surgeons of all sorts ; thirdly, the grocers or poticaries ; fourthly, the empirics ; fifthly, the alchymists ; sixthly, the sorcerers; and lastly, the witches or herbalists; to •whom may be added the astrologers, who, however, rather foretold the occurrence of ailments and distempers than attempted to avert them. The physicians were almost uniformly of the order of Galen, compounding their own prescriptions, and, at all events, affecting a great show of learning, and being often men of eccle- siastical rank and wealth, obtained for their branch of the profession a considerable social status, with which the surgeons and apothe- caries could never compete. In the year 1237 were made the celebrated regulations by the College of Salerno, by which every person was required to spend three years in the study of philosophy, and five years in the study of physic, and to obtain a license after examination by two doctors, before he could enter upon practice in that faculty. And similar regulations appear to have been adopted soon after by the French and English Universities. The laity were never expressly excluded from the practice of physic, provided they obtained the necessary decree; but as most who remained long enough at college to graduate in medicine received holy orders, there are not many lay- men to be found among the earlier medical practitioners, who were often beneficed clergy, and even bishops and other dignitaries among the secular clergy. ^The canon of the Council of Lateran, before referred to, which directs that the physician of the body shall first call in the physician of the soul, and postpone all attempts to cure the body until spiritual medicaments had been applied to the soul, gave the clerical physicians a considerable advantage over their lay competitors. The English Universities had no power to prevent any persons from practising, though they had not graduated iu physic. On this account, therefore, in the 9th year of Henry V., an attempt was made by the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge to obtain legislative authority for excluding every one from the practice of physic who had not taken the degree of Bachelor of ANCIENT ORDERS OF THE MEDICAL PROFESSION. 7 Medicine, under the penalty of 40Z. and imprisonment, whether man or woman. This measure, however, never really obtained the force of an Act of Parliament ; but in the 3rd year of Henry VIII. an Act was passed which is generally received as the foundation of all statute law on the subject. Under this, in order to banish all super- natural obstacles, the bishop of the diocese proceeded to exorcise the fiend, and in order to provide for sufficiency of learning two doctors are required to examine the qualifications of the medical candidate. The third clause of the Act saves the rights and privileges of the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge. But by the 14 and 15 Hen. VIII., 0. 5, reciting the Charter of 10 Hen. VIII., the powers of examination were transferred from the persons appointed for that purpose by the former Act, and confided to the College of Physi- cians, instituted by the charter previously granted by the king as therein recited. Under this statute the University graduates who might desire to practise in London were included ; but the rights and privileges of graduates of Oxford or Cambridge to practise throughout the rest of England were reserved. The appointment of physicians and surgeons to attend upon royalty was from a very early period made by the king, with the assent of the privy council. Lord Coke, in his remarks upon the College of Physicians, alludes to such appointments thus : — " Eex adversa valetudine laborans de assensu concillii assignavit Johannem Arundel, Johannem Saceby, et W. Hatcliff'e, medicos : Eobertum Warren et Johannem Marsliall chirurgos ad libere ministrandum et exequendum in et circa personam suam : viz., quod licite valeant moderare sibi dia)tam suam, et quod possint ministrare potiones, syrupos, confectiones, laxitivas medicinas, clysteria, suppositoria, caput purgea, gargarismata, lealnen, epithi- mota, fomentationes, embrocatioues, capitis rasuram, unctiones, emplastra, cercra ventos. cum scarificatione, vel sine emovodorum provocatione, &c. Dantes singulis in mandatis quod in executione praemissorum sint intendentes, &c." And he adds, " Upon this, four things are to be observed — 1, that no physick ought to be given to the king without good warrant ; 2, that this warrant ought to be made by the advice of his councell ; 3, they ought to minister no other physick than that which is set down in writing ; 4, that they may use the aid of those chirurgeons named in the warrant, but of no apothecary, but to prepare and do all things themselves. «tc. And the reason of all this is the precious regard had of the health and safety of the king, which is the head of the commonwealth. The science of physick containeth the knowledge of chirurgery." — Coke's Institutes, 4th Pt. 251. It has been already remarked that the monkish physicians were 8 ANCIENT ORDERS OF THE MEDICAL PROFESSION. at first the only regular surgeons, and it is not unlikely that they sometimes employed the barbers and farriers in the less agreeable parts of the occupation. But in the eleventh century arose two singular bodies of medical practitioners, the Knights Hospitallers, and the order of St. Lazarus. The former, in addition to their military duties, undertook the care of the sick and wounded in the field of battle, and accompanied the Christian armies in the double capacity of warriors and surgeons. The latter were lazars, or lepers, themselves, who being excluded from the community, formed a separate society, and at lengtli becoming numerous and useful, obtained the order of knighthood, into which they admitted many who were not affected with the complaint. They afterwards formed two classes, the healthy and the diseased, of which the former, like the sons of JSsculapius, accompanied the armies to battle, but de- clining the privilege claimed by the heroes of the Barber- Surgeons' Company to stand therein " unharnessed and uuweaponed," sig- nalized themselves far more by their martial achievements in wound- ing and slaying than in the feats of anointing and healing ; but in reference to the origin of the order, it was a rule that no one should attain the rank of its master, who had not been himself a leper. The operative part of surgery being totally abandoned by the monks, in pursuance of the canon of Tours, that practice fell into the hands of the barbers and smiths, but the more regular and dig- nified surgeons were the gentlemen of the Barbers' Company. The familiar assistants of the ancient clerical surgeons, and provided wuth the recipes of their former employers, it was natural that they should assume the business relinqviished by their superiors. They readily associated the knife and lancet with the razor and the scissors, and at once established as rigorous a doctrine in surgery as the scholastics had previously introduced concerning physic. The first recorded instance of the co-operation of physician and surgeon is the unfortunate case of Eichard I., who seems to have been at- tended, and horribly maltreated by both, when wounded at the siege of Chalus. " Interea regom circimistant undiqiie mixtim, Appouent iiiedici fomcnta, secaiitque chirurghi, Vulnus, ut inde traliaut ferrum leviore periclo." Vide Pasquier, " Rechercli. de la France," lib. 9, c. 31, p. 825. With the exception of a few surgeons about the court, the body seems to have held a very low place in the social scale, but yet they were by no means numerous. The barbers thus practising surgery associated themselves, and formed one of the guilds or companies of Loudon, and at length, in the first year of Edward IV., obtained a charter of incorporation, ANCIENT ORDERS OF THE MEDICAL PROFESSION. 9 bestowing upon tliem certain privileges in the exercise of their mystery, Notwithstanding this, another body of pure surgeons sprung up, who, althougli unauthorized, became competitors of such influence, that tlie barber-surgeous were compelled to acknowledge them, and admit them into one fraternity under the provisions of 32 Ken. VIII., c. 42, a previous Act, 5 Hen. VIII., c. 6, having relieved the barber-surgeons from the duties of watch, ward, quests, and other obligations. All persons were, however, still bound under the 3 Hen. VIII., c. 11, to obtain a license after due examination in order to practise as surgeons within the city of London and eleven miles of the same, under a penalty of 5/. for every month of such practising. Under the 32 Hen. VIII., c. 42, s. 3, those sur- geons using "barbery or shaving within the city of London, suburbs, or one mile circuit of the same city, were prohibited from occupying any surgery, letting of blood, or any other thing belong- ing to surgery, drawing of teeth only except." And it was further enacted that " whosoever useth the mystery or craft of surgery shall in nowise occupy nor exercise the feat or craft of barbery or shaving, neither by himself nor by none other for him, to his or their use." And by sec. 4, " no person should presume to keep any shop of barbery or shaving within the city of London, except he were a freeman of the said corporation and company." By these enact- ments the two callings became at length severed, the above prohi- bitions having been enacted to prevent the spread of infectious and contagious disorders through persons so suiFering resorting to the barbers' shops for the purpose of " being washed or shaven." Ac- cording to Guido de Cauliaco, who wrote about the middle of the fourteenth century, the method of surgery practice was a most bloody and barbarous one, and yet it was not only the orthodox one, but subsequently received the sanction of the English Par- liament, the most cruel and superstitious practices being com- manded with the utmost particularity, even so late as 33 Hen. VIII., c. 12. We read in all the authorities (the last mentioned Act included), of searing irons, of red-hot knives, for cutting and searing at the same time, of the application of a yet bleeding capon to the muti- lated seared stump after amputation, and other absurd and equally torturing modes of conducting an operation, such as boring as many holes as possible in a wounded skull, under the name of trepanning. The apothecaries, or rather the grocers, having in their latter capacity laid in stores of wine, oil, honey, pepper, lard, &c., and also few herbs, very readily superadded ointments and such other 10 ANCIENT ORDERS OF THE MEDICAL PROFESSION. herbs as were deemed applicable for medical purposes. Some wbo bad added to tbis store tbe prescriptions of tbe pbysicians, wbieb tbey were bound to file as their vouchers, acquired a reputation for the knowledge of simples, and took upon them to doctor their customers. It was not until the introduction of chemical medicines, and a variety of mixtures of the physicians, had rendered the medical department of their trade unintelligible to ordinary grocers, that the pharmaceutics appeared as a separate class, and claimed a superiority over the dealers in cheese, butter, sugar, plums, figs, and home-made wines. The two crafts of grocers and apothecaries, like the barbers and surgeons, formed one of the ancient companies of the City of London, and though separated by the charter of 13 Jac. I. into two distinct corporations, the apothecaries even from this period were regarded as a trading company in the city ; and whoever thought proper so to do was at liberty to sell physic through- out the rest of the kingdom, provided he complied with the terms imposed on all traders, in serving an apprenticeship of seven years. It is, however, to the empirics — viz., those who were neither regular physicians, surgeons, nor yet apothecaries, but irregular prac- titioners, under the various names of astrologers, alchymists, sorcerers, and even witches, that alone is the faculty indebted for the slightest degree of improvement. These men, despising or ignorant of the medical theories of the schoolmen, and neglecting the dogmas of the surgeons, marked out each for himself a peculiar line and mode of practice. They thus sometimes hit upon an improved remedy or a real discovery in science. The alchymists especially numbered among them many men of real genius. Such a master mind as that of Eoger Bacon, whilst concurring with others in the delusive search for the philosopher's stone, almost unconsciously surprised himself at progressive discoveries in chemistry. Some new result valuable to science, and peculiarly conducive to the advancement of medical knowledge, emanated from the vain endeavour to discover the elixir vitas, or that all-purifying essence which was to trans- mute all baser ores into the pure and unalloyed residuum of the precious metals. Fortunate thus was it for science that the " auri sacra fames " and a belief in the discovery of the " tree of life " encouraged the observation of nature, and an investigation of its most secret resources, and that thus there arose, out of the study of an absurd philosophy, the discovery of the true philosopher's stone, the adaptation and application of natural forces and elements to the promotion of the happiness and the alleviation of the sufferings of the human race, A despised race, who had learnt among their brethren scattered throughout Arabia, Greece, and Persia, the arts of healing, at an early period of our history alone possessed any valuable knowledge ANCIENT ORDERS OF THE MEDICAL PROFESSION. 11 of medicine, yet pursued their course in secret and under the foulest suspicious. Stigmatized by various opprobrious names simply because they were Jews, their most wholesome drugs were esteemed the bane of Christians, and their most scientific opera- tions in surgery as fatal to every follower of the Cross, and yet their practice was immeasurably superior, both scientifically and operatively, to that of the most approved schools of Christian Europe. A translation of some of the Arabian authors has since divulged the mysteries of the Jewish physicians, and their only remaining excellence henceforth consisted in the simplicity of their practice, and their disinclination to adopt desperate and dangerous remedies. One class of practitioners alone remains to be considered, and though last, not the least, either in professional reputation as physicians, or as clinical dressers of their wounded patients. In the pages of Tacitus we read of the competition of the Ger- man dames with the venerable Priests of the Mistletoe in the science of physic ; and as these ladies were believed to be endued with Divine wisdom, and were more attentive in the choice of their medicines and to the comfort of their patients, they obtained a reputation by no means inferior to that of the regular physicians. Later, in the age of chivalry, the high-born damsel was not only not above, but she deemed it an essential part of her education, to acquire some proficiency in the healing art. Nor does her atten- tion appear to have been confined to the knowledge of the medicinal properties of herbs. She was both physician and surgeon — skilled not only in composing soothing drinks and making unctuous oint- ments, but, as our ancient poets describe her, occupied in setting broken and dislocated limbs, and dressing wounds, incurred perhaps in championing her virtues, or sought as honourable tokens of her knight's devotion. The kindness and attention of such a surgeon would doubtless do much to alleviate the sufferings of any knight, and probably the simple remedies comprised in the " one touch of nature," were the best and most nutritious regimen. It remains to be seen whether modern female aspirants to medical practice can rival, not to say surpass, the high-souled damsels thus described in the Fairy Queen. " Where many grooms and squires ready were To take him from his steed full tenderly ; And eke the fairest Alma met him there. With balm, and wine, and costly spicery ; To comfort him in liis intirmity : Eftsoones she caused him up to be conveyed, Aud of his arms despoil'd easily ; In sumptuous bed she made him be laid, And all the while his wounds were dressing by him stayed." laiiry Queen, 1, 2, e. 11, st. 49. 12 ANCIENT ORDERS OF THE MEDICAL PROFESSION. " So prosper'd tlie sweet lass, her strength alone Thrust deftly back the dislocated bone ; Then cutting curious herbs, of virtue tried, While her white smock the needful bands supplied, VV^ith many a coil the limb she swathed around. And nature's strength returned, nor knew the former wound." I hid. It was not until the year 1422 that any attempt was made to interfere with women practising physic, by subjecting them to a. fine of 40/., and imprisonment, but the Bill containing this prohibition never had the eftect of an Act of Parliament. (Petyt's MSS. v. 33, p. 140.) Comparatively modern times, and a profession of Paith that wholly repudiates all belief in the continued existence of miracles, at length set the seal to credulity, and capped the climax of superstition. Whatever mysterious efficacy in Druidical times may have attached to the mistletoe, when duly impregnated with, the moon's propitious beam, cropped by sacred hands with a conse- crated golden sickle, and reverently placed on white and holy cloth, it lay garnered in the woodland sanctuary — and whatever may at one time have been the supposed influence of the " incon- stant moon" on human intellect or human affections, these, and all other superstitions, pale before the National belief which, under the name of the Service for the " Healing of the Sick," disgraced the Book of Common Prayer until a comparatively recent period, attributing to that " Divinity which doth hedge a king" a remedial power, by the mysterious imposition of whose royal hands, accompanied by the profanity of invoking the aid of sacred writ by way of incantation, the sick recovered. The following graphic description of the practice of touching for the king's evil is thus referred to by Macaulay, in the third volume of his "History of England" — the reign of William and Mary. " The days on which this miracle was to be wrought were fixed at sittings of the Privy Council, and were solemnly notified by the clergy in all the parish churches of the realm. See the Order in Council of Jan. 9, 1GS3. When the appointed time came several divines in full canonicals stood round the canopy of state. The surgeon of the royal household introduced the sick. A passage from the 16th chapter of the Gospel of St. Mark was read. When the words ' They shall lay their hands on the sick, and they shall recover,' had been pronounced, there was a pause, and one of the sick was brought up to the king. His Majesty stroked the ulcers and swellings, and hung round the patient's neck a white riband, to which was fastened a gold coin. The other sufferers were then led up in succession ; and as each was touched, the chaplain ANCIENT ORDERS OF THE MEDICAL PROFESSION. 13 repeated the incantation, ' They shall lay tlieir hands on the sick and they shall recover.' Theu came the epistle, prayers, antipho- nies, and a benediction. The service may still be found in the prayer-books of the reign of Anne. Indeed it was not until some time after the accession of George I. that the University of Oxford ceased to reprint the Office of Healing together with the Liturgy. Theologians of eminent learning, ability, and virtue, gave the sanction of their autliority to this mummery, and, what is stranger still, medical men of high note leUeved, or affected to oelieve, in the balsamic virtues of the royal hand. We must suppose that every surgeon who attended Charles II. was a man of high repute for skill ; and more than one of the surgeons who attended Charles II. has left us a solemn profession of faith in the king's miraculous power. One of them is not ashamed to tell us that the gift was communicated by the unction administered at the coronation ; that the cures were so numerous and sometimes so rapid that they could not be attributed to any natural cause ; and the failures w^ere to be ascribed to want of faith on the part of the patients ; that Charles once handled a querulous quaker, and made him a healthy man and a sound churchman in a moment; that if those wlio had been healed lost or sold the piece of gold which had been hung round their necks, the ulcers broke forth again, and could be removed only by a second touch, and a second talisman. Tlie crowds which repaired to the palace on the days of healing were immense. Charles II., in the course of his reign, touched near a hundred thousand persons In 1682 he performed the rite eight thousand five hundred times. In 1681 the throng was such that six or seven of the sick w'ere trampled to death. Jamrs, in one of his progresses, touched eight hundred persons in the choir of the Cathedral of Chester. The expense of the ceremony was little less than 10,000?. a year, and would have been much greater but for the vigilauce of the royal surgeons, whose business it was to examine the applicants, and to distinguish those who came for the cXire from those who came for the gold." See the preface to a Treatise on AVounds, by Kichard Wiseman, Sergeant Chirurgeon to His Majesty, 1676. And further information is to be found in the Clarisma Basilicon, by John Browne, Chirurgeon in ordinary to His Majesty, 1684. See also. The Ceremonies used in the time of King Henry VII. for the healing of them that be diseased with the King's Evil, published by his Majesty's command, 1686 ; Evelyn's Diary, March 28, 1684 ; and Bishop Cartwright'a Diary, August 28, 29, and 30, 1087. William HI. seems to have not only discouraged, but to have denounced the royal practice. " It is a silly superstition," he ex- claimed on one occasion when he heard that his palace was besieged 14. ANCIENT OBDERS OF THE MEDICAL PKOFESSION. by a crowd of the sick, " Give tbe poor creatures some money, and send them away." On one single occasion was he importuned into laying his hand on a patient. " Grod give you better health," he said, " and more sense." Carte, in his History of England (pub. 1747), mentions a case of one Christopher Lovell whom he saw at Bristol in I7l7, who had recently been touched in Paris by the King in November, 1716, from which moment his humour dispersed and his sores healed, till, in the beginning of January, he was in perfect health. Dr. Lane, an eminent physician, and Mr. Samuel Pye, a very skilful surgeon, both of Bristol, mentioned the case as one, if not miraculous, at least as one of the most wonderful events that had ever happened. It would therefore appear that superstitious beliefs are not pecu- liar to what some aifect to call the Dark Ages, nor yet are they confined to the remote ages of antiquity, neither are they accom- panied and sanctified by religious rites solely of a Druidical, heathenish, or barbarous character. lo CHAPTEE II. MODEEN ORDERS OE THE MEDICAL PROrESSIOIf ; OR THOSE ENTITLED TO BE REGISTERED UNDER THE MEDICAL ACT (1858). TJp to the passing of the Medical Act (1858), 21 & 22 Vict. c. 90, three orders of the medical profession were distinctly recognised, — physicians, surgeons, and apothecaries. Chemists and druggists also had, in the courts of law, met with a legal recognition as persons who might make and vend medicines, and even compound them, according to the prescriptions of a physician, or the directions of an apothecary ; and they, as well as the dentists, have since received a statutory status by the Medical and Pharmacy Acts, but not in any sense as medical men. The following institutions confer the qualifications entitling per- sons to be registered as practising medicine, or surgery, or medicine and surgery, as the case may be : — 1. The Eoyal College of Physicians of London. And here it is desirable to give a short history of this College. The Eoyal College of Physicians of London, or, as it is styled under the new charter proposed to be granted in pursuance of the 47th section of the Medical Act, " The Eoyal College of Physicians of England," enjoyed and still enjoys, under the statute 32Hen.YIIT., c. 40, s. 3, the right of practising physic in all its branches, among which surgery is specially enumerated. The law, therefore, permits those constituting its body both to prescribe and compound medi- cines, and as well to perform as to superintend operations in surgery. The exclusive power of the College is as follows : — By the 14 & 15 Hen. VIII., c. 5, reciting a royal charter of 10 lien. VIII., and which is still in force, except as it may be inconsistent with their proposed new charter and the Medical Acts, no one is permitted to practise medicine (which includes surgery) within the London precinct — i.e., within the City, and seven miles round it, without a license from the College, under a penalty of 5Z. a month for every whole month of such practising. This right, at first rigidly exercised, at length fell almost into abeyance. The College was unsuccessful, in the year 1829, in a suit against one Harrison, reported in 9 BarnewaU & CressweU, 524, 16 MODERN ORDERS OF THE MEDICAL PROFESSION. since ■which no action for such unlicensed practising has been brought. The College has no special power to interfere with practice in the country, but, as the 3 Hen. VIII., c. 11, distinctly forbids any one to practise beyond the London precinct, whether as a surgeon or phy- sician, unless duly licensed by the authorities of that day, and as the 14 & 15 Heu.VIII., c. 5 (reciting the charter of the College), expressly forbids any one thenceforth to practise " through England until he be examined and appi'oved at London by the President and three of the elects of the College of Physicians (except he be a graduate of Oxford or Cambridge)," any infringement, even of this enactment, though no penalty is imposed by the Act, was a misdemeanour at law, as was observed by Lord Denman in Collins v. Carnegie (1 Adolphus & Ellis, 695). His Lordship said : " The statute, indeed, imposes no penalty upon unlicensed practitioners beyond the seven miles, but the prohibitory words are strong enough to make the prac- tice unlawful." Such, therefore, might have been the subject of an indictment. This restriction no longer exists even against unquali- fied practitioners ; the power of the elects thus to examine and grant letters testimonial having been repealed by the 5th section of the Medical Act (1860). The College can, however, grant licenses without restricting their licentiates from compounding and supplying for gain the medicines they prescribe, and such is not an invasion of the privileges of the Society of Apothecaries : Attorney- General v. Tlie Royal College of Physicians, iJohnson & Hemming's Rep. p. 561. The former division of the College was, until recently, into fellows, licentiates, and extra licentiates, but now, under a bye-law of the 8th August, 1859, licentiates who shall have been admitted licentiates before the 1st of October, 1859, and extra licentiates under the bye- laws enacted February 16th, 1859, and graduates in medicine who shall be admitted licentiates before the 1st of March, 1860, under the same bye-laws, shall, from and after October 1, 1859, be styled members. The members are alone eligible to the fellowship, but they must be of at least four years, standing, and not less than thirty years of age, and have distinguished themselves in the practice of medicine, or in medical or general science, or literature. All persons who have been either licentiates or members during a period of four years on the whole previously to October 1, 1863, shall be con- sidered members of four years' standing. They are not eligible, however, if they practise pharmacy, or practise physic or surgery in partnership, so long as that partnership contiuues ; nor if they make any engagement with any person for the supply of medicine from which profit is derived, nor if engaged in trade. The members are entitled to the use of the library and museum, and shall be admitted to all lectures and enjoy other privileges, but they shall not be MODERN ORDERS OF THE MEDICAL PROFESSION. 17 entitled to any share in tlie government, nor to attend or vote at general meetings of tlie cor])oration. And any person not engaged in the practice of pharmacy, who shall have satisfied the College of his knowledge of medical and general science and literature, may be proposed to the College to receive a license to practise physic as a member, provided he is twenty-five years of age. No candidate to be admitted to examination who is engaged in trade, or practises in any of those ways previously enumerated with respect to members. Those licentiates who are not restricted from supplying medicines to their patients (under a resolution of April, 1860) are entitled to register under the Medical Act as licentiates. Such licen- tiates are not members of the corporation. They must not, under the bye-laws, compound or dispense medicines, except for patients under their own care, nor are they permitted to assume the title of Doctor of Medicine, or use any other name, title, designation, or distinction implying that they are graduates in medicine of an Uni- versity, unless they are such graduates in fact ; nor yet shall they, by virtue of the license, represent themselves as fellows or members of a College of Physicians. All classes, however, whether they be termed fellows, members, licentiates, or extra licentiates, are now, after registration, entitled to practise tin-oughout the Queen's dominions. The following, though somewhat of a digression, may yet be found interesting, and, perhaps, instructive ; and as those styled members are now acknowledged as eligible for fellowships, it is hoped, in the words of Mr. Willcock, " that the jealousy which has for along time disturbed the harmony of this highly-respectable profession will gradually abate," and let us add, "may totally cease." It should be remembered that — as is truly said by Mr. AVillcock — '' This College was instituted in a reign during which patents of monopoly and exclusive privileges were daily granted, and more frequently for the purpose of replenishing the exchequer, and enrich- ing individuals by the profits of the monopoly, than in consideration of the public welfare." (p. 36.) It may here be observed that the order of candidates, as men- tioned by Mr. AV'illcock, is not founded in any Act of Parliament or charter, but was created by the bye-laws. They were not, there- fore, as Mr, Willcock adnnts, " officers, or even members of the cor- poration, but mere licentiates; and the admission into this class amounted merely to a declaration of present intention, which created no kind of obligation on the body to elect them into the order of fellows." (pp. 43, 44.) " It is evident," says Mr. Willcock, " that the charter so far incorporated all persons of the same faculty of and in London (the words of the original charter are, " onmesque homines ejusdem lacultatis, de et in civitate pnedicta,") that every person on the C 18 MODERN ORDERS OF THE MEDICAL PROFESSION. 23rcl of September, in the tenth year of the reigu of Henry VIII., falling within that description, was entitled to be admitted into the association. Such of them as had availed themselves of this privi- lege, and others subsequently admitted, are the persons described by Act 32 Henry YIII. as commons and fellows." (s. 2.) " But as to the persons who should afterwards enjoy that distinction, the original charter, and all subsequent statutes, are silent." ( Willcock's Laws Relating to the Medical Profession, p. 34.) This opinion of Mr. "Willcock's is based upon a legal decision on the point contained in re C. Stanger, M.D., 7 Term Eep. 283-295 (a.d. 1797), which was an application for a mandamus, commanding the College of Physicians to examine the complainant as to his qualification and fitness to be admitted into the said corporation, as a member or fellow thereof. The affidavit in support of the rule, re- ferred to 3 Hen. VIII., c. 1 l,and 14 & 15 Hen. VIII., c. 5. The appli- cant was a doctor of physic of Edinburgh, and in 1796 had obtained a license from the College to practise in London and its precinct. The affidavits on the part of the College disclosed that a bye-law "was made by the College in 1637, ordaining that no person should be admitted a fellow unless he had performed all his exercises and disputatious in one of our Universities without dispensation ; and another was passed in 1751, which declared that the meaning of the above words was, that no person should be admitted into the class of candidates who was not a doctor of physic of Oxford or Cam- bridge, or having obtained that degree in the University of Dublin, has been incorporated into the University of Oxford or Cambridge ; that Charles II., by a letter to the College in 1674, signified his pleasure and directed the College not to admit any person who had not had his education in either the University of Oxford or Cam- bridge." The question was whether the bye-law was a reasonable one, it being admitted that no notice should be taken of the letter from Charles II. Lord Kenyon (C.J.) considered that it was, but he added — " If indeed, this {i.e. the taking a degree as before described) had been a sine (/va non, and it had operated as a total exclusion of every other mode of gaining access to ihe College, it would have been a bad bye-law ; but these bye-la\\s jjoint out other modes of gain- ing admission into the College. If Dr. Stanger has all those requisites that qualify a person for that high station, any one of the fellows may now propose him : he may apply to the honourable feeling of tlie College, to the very same tribunal to which this mandamus, if it were granted, would refer him : for at all events he must submit to their examination and determination." Such being the opinion also of the other members of the Court, the rule for a mandamus was discharged. MODERN ORDERS OF THE MEDICAL PROFESSION. 19 In 17(59, a similar application had been made to the Court of King's Bench by Dr. Edward Archer, to whom had been granted in 1752, after the proper examination, a diploma to practise iu London and within seven miles thereof. The Court refused the application, upon the ground that a licentiate could show no title to be admitted, as of right, a fellow, and a member of the corpora- tion. (5 Burrows, 2710-2713.) As was stated by Lord Mansfield in re Archer (ante), the statute in question is only Vi iwivate Act, and the College is therefore to a certain extent a private body : in it however were included, originally, as before mentioned, all men of the same faculty of and in the city of London, and this was for a long time thought to afford sufficient grounds for contending that such a right of incorpo- ration continued to exist, but in re Dr. Stanger, before referred to, Mr. Justice Lawrence explained that "the intention of the Crown was to incorporate the six persons named in the charter, and all men practising physic at that time de et in civitate prcedictd, and all those persons were entitled to admission ; but the Crown did not intend to give any right to those who might thereafter become hoviincs facnllatis, but intended that the succession should be con- tinued by tlie powers incidental to all corporations to elect. Had the charter incorporated nominatini, every man authorized to practise physic in London, and given no directions as to the succes- sion, they would have been authorized to continue themselves by election as they have done, and the charter has done the same thing in substance by incorporating the same persons by a general reference to their character and situation." {lb.) " The president and fellows," says Mr. Willcock, " constitute the community of this College, being the only members of it." (p. 37.) " The licentiates of the College," says the same authority, " who may practise within the precincts of London, are of three orders : fellows, candidates, and mere licentiates, of whom the last are alone generally denominated licentiates." (p. 32.) " The licentiates {i. e., the last named or mere licentiates) are those who have only a license to practise physic within the precinct of London." {Ih. p' 38.) " The second class are those who have received that license, but whose license also states that they are admitted to the order 'of candidates." {lb. p. 38.) " The third class are those who have received that license, but whose license shovA's that they are admitted to the order of fellows. This license has often been called a diploma, hut as it confers no de- cree the word is not properly applied, according to its more strict signification." {lb. p. 39.) The common law has given every man a right to practise in any C2 20 MODERN OEDERS OF THE MEDICAL PROFESSION. profession or business in wlaieh he is competent, and by the incorpo- ration of the clause in the charter of Henry VIII., into the 14 and 15 Hen. YIII., c. 5, a statutory authority, viz., the College of Physicians, ^Yas thenceforth made the judge of that competency. It became, therefore, their duty to admit every one to practise in the faculty who satisfied them of his competency, learning, and medical knowledge, and, it may be added, integrity ; and if the College refused to examine any applicant the Court of Queen's Bench might issue a mandamus to compel the admission to examination of such applicants. See the observations of Lord Mansfield in Dr. Letch's case : 4 Burrows, 2186-2195 (E. T. 1767.) " There can be no doubt," said his Lordship, " that the College are obliged, in conformity to the trust and confidence placed in them by the Crown and public, to admit all that are fit, and to reject all that are unfit." Bye-laws have from time to time been made with a view of sub- jecting the admission to the Order of Fellows to veiy arbitrary rules ; and the validity of many of these bye-laws may fairly be questioned, if only upon the ground of their unreasonableness. The charter, subsequently embodied in the statute, merely in- corporates the men of the faculty in and of London — and this is the only qualification required by the charter — and the incidental power possessed by every corporation of continuing itself, as intimated by Mr. Justice Lawrence {ante) where no special mode is expressly pointed out, it is the duty of the body to exercise as often as they may think expedient. In this corporation, therefore, upon the first principle of corpo- ration law, tlie original fellows had, and their successors have, an unfettered right to elect such persons as they may think proper to perpetuate the corporation, provided only that they be men of the faculty of and in London; and the persons so elected are entitled to be admitted into the body, and if their right is disputed, to en- force it by the aid of the Court of Queen's Bench. The statute, in fact, rendered all men of the faculty of and in London eliyilJe to the fellowship. If a bye-law goes the length of saying that all men of the faculty of and in Loudon are not eligible, it virtually afiects to repeal that clause of the Act. It is directly in teeth of the statute. Neither is an examination of already approved members required by the statute, and may indeed be well deemed superfluous. If the legislature had deemed such an examination necessary as a preliminary to eligibility for the fellowship they ■would have mentioned it, as they have mentioned as necessary an examination for licentiates : they deemed an examination necessary for those from among whom the president was to be elected ; there- fore they required it : and they further deemed it expedient that country practitioners should be examined, and therefore they made MODERN ORDERS OF THE MEDICAL PROFESSION. 1^1 it a requirement. The px.imination is to secure the health of the people against the ignorance or rashness of uneducated practitioners, but this can have no reference to the distinguishing office of fellows, who have already been examined for the membership. No doubt there are peculiar qualifications required for that office, such as a reputation for superiority among the other members of the profession, and that knowledge of the world, and general acquaintance with the manners of medical men, which might render them particularly capable of judging of the rules necessary for the regulation of the conduct of medical practitioners. The only reasonable ground of admission of one man above auotlier is that the existing fellows have long ob- served his conduct, in the course of his professional career, and that from such observation they are induced to consider him peculiarly qualified to become an example to his professional brethren, and to take a share in the " oversight and correction of the men of the faculty within the precinct of London." The original act of incorporation gave the fellows, no doubt, an . unrestricted right of electing whom they pleased, limited only by the profession of the elected, but it gave them no power to place a limit upon the eVujibiliUj of candidates, by restricting it to any persons in particular, or by excluding others not excluded by the statute. As no person can acquire any inchoate right of admis- sion into the order of fellows, so no person can be excluded by any unreasonable bye-law, neither can the existing fellows be restrained by the bye-laws from electing into their number any persons they may so wish to distinguish. No academical degree of any kind is necessary for election to a fellowship, although at one time tlie statutes of the college required that every candidate, even for the license, should have received the degree of doctor of medicine, after two years' residence in some academy for the purpose of studying physic, but this is virtually delegating the powers of judging of the candidate's competency and proficiency to a body unconnected witli the College, which cannot be done, so that it might be difficult to sustain such a bye-law. At all events it has long since been abandoned, and any persons who have been elected members are now acknowledged to be eligible for the fellowships. It is unnecessary to refer to the highly penal, and indeed quasi- criminal jurisdiction, at one time claimed and exercised by the College over those practising without its license, except to mention it as a tiling of the past. In Dr. Bonham's case, 8 Coke, 107-114< (M. T. 6 Jac. I.) the College assumed, not only to punish by fine a doctor of physic of Cambridge University, for practising in London without license of the College, but to commit him to prison, without bail or mainprize, for disobedience. But Chief Justice Coke observed " that none can be punished for practising physic in 22 MODERN ORDERS OF THE MEDICAL PROFESSION. London but by forfeiture of 51. by the mouth — and if any practise physic there for less than a month, he shall forfeit nothing." And it was further resolved by the Court, consisting of three judges, " that the clause which gives power to the censors to fine and imprison doth not extend to the clause, ' quod nemo in dicta civitate, &c., exerceat dictam facultatem, &c.,' but extends only to punish those who practise physic, &c, ' pro delictis suis non bene exequendo, faciendo, et utendo facultate medicinse, by fine and im- prisonment,' so that the censors have not power by the letters patent and the Act to fine and imprison any for practising physic in London, but only for ill and not good use and practice of physic." Several cases occurred in early times in which the power of im- prisonment was exercised by the College for malpraxis, but in almost, if not all these cases, the defendants upon being brought up by habeas cor])us were discharged upon some technicality, and in the case of Dr. Alphonso, 2 Buls. 259 (M. T. 12 Jac. I.), and Dr. Greenoelt, 1 Lord Eaymond, 213, 214 (E. T. 9 Wm. III.), the defendants were pardoned by the king. It might be a matter of regret that this summary jurisdiction over malpractitioners should have fallen into desuetude, were it not that the courts of criminal jurisdiction are now sufficiently alive to their duties in dealing with all such cases ; but with regard to civil cases and vexatious inter- ference, some words of reproof, that fell from Lord Kenyon in Dr. Stanger's case, it might be as well even now to remember. " By what fatality," said the learned judge, " it has happened, that almost ever since this charter was granted this learned body have been in a state of litigation, I know not ; indeed I cannot see what these parties are contending for that is worth the expense and anxiety attending this litigation." And again, in the case of Archer and Fothergill, before referred to, Lord Mansfield, speaking of the College of Physicians, said, " I have foreseen the labyrinth and maze of litigation that this learned body would be involved in by per- sisting rigidly on both sides in pursuing the points of their dispute, and contesting about a feather. I have read over all their constitu- tions, statutes, and bye-laws, and many of them appear to be narrow, if not illegal." As under the new medical Acts the powers of the College are most materially abridged, it is to be hoped that it will be found not inconsistent with their dignity to accept the advice tendered by- Lord Mansfield in Dr. Letch's case, the report of which thus con- cludes, " His lordship concluded with a recommendation to the College to settle all other matters amongst themselves, without coming to this Court : at the same time intimating to them a caution against narrowin(j their grounds of admission so much, that even if a Boerhaave should be resident here, he could not be admitted into MODERN ORDERS OF THE MEDICAL PROFESSION. 23 their fellowship." More than a century ha3 elapsed since these words were pronounced, it is to be hoped not without effect. 2. The College of Fhysicians of J^diiiLiayh.— According to a clause in tlieir charter, a.d. 16S1, and ratified by an Act of the Scottish Parliament on the 16th June, 1GS5, it would appear that the fellows and licentiates of this college are entitled to practise medicine only, and not surgery. The rights of the surgeon- apothecaries of Edinburgh are expressly reserved by the charter. The fellows, members, and licentiates are all entitled to registra- tion, and, by the 47th section of the Medical Act, " within twelve months of the granting a new charter " to the College of Physi- cians of London, "any such fellow, member, or licentiate, who may be in practice as a physician in any part of England, and who may desire to become a member of such newly-styled College of Physicians of England, may do so, and be entitled to receive the diploma of such College accordingly, on the payment of a fee of 2Z. 3. Kinfs and Queen's College of Physicians, Ireland. — This College, and Trinity College, Dublin, form conjointly the " School of Physic " of Ireland. AVhether the qualification of an Irish physi- cian extends to the practice of surgery and pharmacy is uncertain. The fellows and licentiates are entitled to registration. This College is entitled to the same privileges under the 47th section, as above, as is the College of Physicians of Edinburgh. 4. College of Surgeons of England.— 'Y\ie c^uaYx'ac^iixon conferred by this College is to practise surgery only, but s\irgery includes medical treatment as ancillary to the removal of surgical complaints. (Allison V. Ilaydon, 3; Carrington and Payne, 246; Proud v. Mayall, 3 ; Dowling and Lowndes, 531.) As midwifery is no branch of the medical art, and any one may practise it, from the very neces- sity of the case, it is questionable how far the bye-law which excludes fellows of the College from practising it is lawful. Fellows and members are entitled to registration. By 18 G-eo. II., c. 15, members of this College might, even before the Medical Act, practise in all parts of the empire. Under their charter (Charles II.) confirmed by the above Act, they still possess an exclusive right of practising surgery within the London precinct, as against those who are not qualified so to do. The penalty is 57. a month, and every person not qualified' in surgery is liable to the same penalty for practising surgery in any part of England or "Wales. It is needless to say even this penalty is never enforced. Licentiates in*j\Iidwifery of this College, by becoming registered, possess now for the first time a parliamentary recognition, and a legal right to recover their fees, but they have no exclusive privileges. 5. College of Surgeons, Edinhurgh. — The parliamentary ratifica- 24* MODERN ORDERS OF THE MEDICAL PROFESSION. tion of the patent of "William and Mary gave to the fellows and licentiates of this College the right of practising pharmacy in addition to surgery. If irrespective of this Parliamentary title the right incidentally flows from their qualification of surgeon, they may be able legally to practise medicine in England, notwithstanding the Apothecaries Act. The exclusive powers of this corporation which still exist as against unqualified persons, extend over the counties of Edinburgh, Linlithgow, Haddington, Eife, Peebles, Selkirk, Roxburgh, and Berwick. Fellows and licentiates are entitled to registration. 6. The Faculty of Fhysicians and Surgeons of Glasgoiv. — This body is, by its charter granted by James VI. in 1599, and ratified in 1672, notwithstanding its name, only a College of Surgeons. The exclusive rights of this College were given up in 1850, when by 13 Vict. c. 20, s. 2, fellows and licentiates were " to enjoy the same status and privileges as if the said faculty had been specially autho- rized by law to grant licenses and diplomas in surgery, conferring the same status and privileges as those conferred by any corpora- tion or Eoyal College in Scotland." If the effect of this clause be to place the faculty on the same footing as the College of Surgeons of Edinburgh, Grlasgow Surgeons will be entitled to practise medicine also throughout her Majesty's dominions. Eellows and licentiates are entitled to registration. 7. FeJloics or Licentiates of the Eoyal College of Surgeons, Ireland. — This corporation has no exclusive privileges, except that its members alone could be appointed surgeons to a county infir- mary. AVhether these surgeons could combine the practice of medicine with surgery is somewhat doubtful, but the better opinion is that they could not without a license from the Apothecaries Hall, Dublin. The fellows and licentiates of this College are entitled to registration. 8. Society of Apothecaries, London. — Although throughout the Medical Act, pharmacy, as a branch of practice, is nowhere men- tioned, the only two branches of practice enumerated in section 31 being " Medicine" and " Surgery," yet Licentiates of the Society of Apothecaries, London, and Licentiates of Apothecaries Hall, Dublin, are mentioned in schedule, A as persons duly qualified to practise medicine if registered accordingly. The apothecaries, or rather the grocers, had their own share of medical practice, such as it was, long before the distribution of the medical faculty into physicians and surgeons. The grocers, or potecaries, as they are indifferently termed, formed one of the ancient companies of the city of London ; and it was only in the 13th year of James I. that they were formed into two distinct corporations. Even from this period the apothe- caries were at liberty to sell physic throughout the rest of the MODERN ORDERS OF THE MEDICAL PROFESSION. 25 kingdom, provided tliey had served an apprenticeship of seven years, and thereby become freemen of the Company. They had from a very early period occasionally prescribed the medicines which they sold, thus trespassing on the province of the physician, as it was thought, until the House of Lords in the case The College of Physicians v. 'Rose, decided in favour of their practice, since which they have continued to do so unmolested. It was, in consequence of this decision, thought at length desirable to provide more effectually for the education of this branch of the faculty, and therefore by 55 Geo. III., c. 191, every one practising as an apothe- cary in any part of England or Wales without a certificate from the Company is liable to a penalty of 20?., and this clause has operated as an exclusion against all persons (except physicians) from practising medicine accordingly, the penalty having been actively enforced. The exclusion will be powerless in future against Irish apothecaries, and possibly against Scotch surgeons ; but remains in full force against all unqualified persons practising as apothecaries in England and Wales. The licentiates of the Apothecaries Com- pany, upon being registered as such, are now enabled to practise in all parts of her Majesty's dominions. 9. Apothecaries Hall, Dublin.— This company was first incorpo- rated by royal charter in 17^5, having up to that time been an un- incorporated civic guild. In 1791 they obtained an Act of further incorporation, the 31 Greo. III., c. 34. They claim the following privileges : the right to charge for professional attendance as well as for medicine ; the exclusive right to keep shop for dispensing and compounding medicine under a penalty of 20/., and many other rights and immunities, which so far as they relate to the selling, compound- ing, or dispensing medicines, are expressly reserved to them by the 55th section of the Medical Act, and therefore their penalty still remains in force against unqualified persons. If, as is stated, the Irish apothecary may legally practise surgery, his registered qua- lification will in such case permit him to practise physic and surgery throughout the empire. Licentiates are entitled to regis- tration. 10. Universities.— -The degree ]\I.D., orM.B., L.INL, or Master in Surgery of any University in the United Kingdom. The first three of these degrees clearly give the possessors a right of pre- scribing in medicine. Whether the Mastership in Surgery limits its possessor to purely surgical practice might be a question, were it not that at Cambridge at least (and this may also apply to the Irish diploma or License in Surgery) the candidate must have passed all the examinations required for the degree of Bachelor of Medicine, besides having attended lectures on surgery and attended during three years hospital surgical practice, and have been house- 2G MODERN ORDERS OF THE MEDICAL PROFESSION. surgeon or dresser for at least six months at such hospital. As such a practitioner, having already passed the examinations for the degree of M.B., usually, when arrived at sufficient standing, pro- ceeds to take it, the practical solution of the question would scarcely be likely to occur, as under sec. 30 he could have his further quali- fication inserted in the register in addition to his previous surgical one. As the restriction of the College of Physicians, England, has been neglected, and indeed is inconsistent with the general right to practise under this Act, these graduates may be said to have the right of practising throughout the Queen's dominions, London and its precincts even, by courtesy not excepted. By the Medical Graduates Act, 1S54 (17 and 18 Vict., c. 114), every iVI.B. and M.D. of the University of London is entitled to practise physic as fully in all respects as every MB. or M.D. of Oxford and Cambridge is entitled by virtue of his degree, or under any power, license, or authority conferred by either of the last-named Universities, such privileges however not to extend to the practice of surgery, pliar- macy, or midwifery. By sec. 53 of the Medical Act, the Medical Graduates Act remains in full force, notwithstanding the surrender of the therein recited charter of the University of London, and the granting of the existing charter, or the future determination of it, or any future charter. A medical graduate of London, if he pos- sesses no further registered qualification, can only prescribe medicine in the same way as any M.D. or M.B. of Oxford or Cambridge, and does not possess the full privileges of the Eoyal College of Physi- cians of England in treating cases of surgery, or in compounding his own medicines. Neither can he practise in midwifery, except as it is apprehended any one may practise it, as being the superintendence and assistance sometimes required, even in a natural and healthy function, and from the necessity of the case. Licentiates in midwifery of the College of Surgeons, London, are specially recognised by the Act, and though they exclude no one else, they have a Parliamentary right to recover as such, which it would appear the M.B. or M.D. of London would not have, being expressly interdicted by the above statute. Medical graduates of Durham have alsoa right to practise medicine. The five universities of Scotland all have the power of granting M.D. degrees, and therefore such graduates have the right of prac- tising medicine ; as also Trinity College, Dublin. None of these universities have any exclusive power, and their medical graduates upon being registered are now entitled to prac- tise in medicine throughout her Majesty's dominions. 11. Doctor of Medicine hy Doctorate, granted before tlie passing of the Act, hy the Archbishop of Canterbury. — This limitation does not interfere with the power of the Archbishop to continue to grant MODERN ORDERS OF THE MEDICAL PROFESSION. 27 such degrees as a purely Iwnorarij distinction, but they will not be any longer recognised as a qualification for practice. They have hitherto but seldom been granted to others than those who had already achieved a reputation in a lower walk of the profession, and who perhaps were too far advanced in life to commence afresh an academical course of study. They are at least more respectable than many foreign degrees, and may still be bestowed, perhaps upon retiring successful practitioners, as a mark of honourable recognition of a useful and prosperous career. Those possessing them at the time of the passing of the Act are rendered eligible for registration. 12. Doctors of Medicine of Foreign and Colonial Universities or Colleges practising as Physicians in the United Kingdom before the 1st of Octoler, 1858. — All such who were practising as physicians in the United Kingdom before 1st of October, 1858, who shall produce certificates to the satisfaction of the Council of their having taken the degree of Doctor of Medicine after regular examination, or who shall satisfy the Council, under sec. 16, that there is a sufficient reason to dispense with any of the provisions of the Act in their particular cases, are entitled to be registered. The Act gives to the Council this dispensing power in favour of " persons practising Medicine or Surgery, within the United Kingdom, on foreign or colonial Diplomas or degrees, before the passing of this Act ;" but in schedule A no mention is made of those practising " surgery on foreign diplomas," but this defect is cured by the words " and also" being used in sec. 46. This dispensing power is also extended to the cases of those who have been surgeons, or assistant-surgeons in the army or navy, militia, or East India Company, or are acting as surgeons in the public service, or the service of any charitable insti- tution ; and, as far as the Council shall deem expedient, in favour of medical students who had commenced their professional studies before the passing of the Act. And by 22 Yict. c. 21, s. 6, any person not a British subject, having any foreign University Degree or Diploma of Doctor of Medicine, who shall have passed the regular examinations entitling him to practise medicine in his own country, may still act as medical officer or resident physician of any hospital established ex- clusively for the relief of foreigners in sickness. Such person, how- ever, is not to act in any other medical practice. The following persons, in addition, are entitled to registration : — By the 17th section of the Act, " Any person who was actually practising medicine in England before the 1st August, 1815, shall on payment of the requisite fee be entitled to be registered, on pro- ducing to one of the registrars a declaration to the eftect that he was practising as a medical practitioner at a certain place before the 28 MODERN ORDERS OF THE MEDICAL PROFESSION. day above-mentioned. This section is a continuation of the ex- emption in the Apothecaries' Acts, whereby all persons in practice as apothecaries on 1st of August, 1815, are relieved from the penalty imposed on every one else (saving the rights of physicians) for practising as apothecaries in England and Wales without a certifi- cate, and such persons alone are withia the scope of this section. As 55 years have all but elapsed since August, 1815, there cannot in the course of nature be many now on the register under this section. 29 CHAPTER III. EIGHTS, PRIVILEaES, AND IMMUNITIES OF DULT-EEGISTEEED MEDICAL PEACTITIONERS. By the 31st section of the Act, " Every person registered under the Act shall be entitled according to his qualification or qualifica- tions to practise medicine or surgery, &c." ..." and to demand and recover in any court of law, with full costs of suit, reasdnable charges for professional aid, advice, and visits, and the cost of any medicines, or other medical or surgical applications rendered or sup- plied by him to his patients." Although at common law a physician could maintain no action for his fees unless by special contract, now by the above section a general right of action is given to all registered practitioners ; and a physician may now, if registered, maintain an action for atte'udance since the passing of the Act, without proof of any express contract or implied understanding with the patient that he should be paid. Gibbon v. Budd. 32 Law Journal (Exch.) 282. 2 Hurlstoue and Coltman, 92. It appears from the report of the case that the Hoyal College of Physicians has availed itself of the proviso contained in the same section, and has passed a bye-law tliat no Eellow of the College shall be entitled to sue for his fees, but this does not include onem- hers. If surgery be included in the qualification of a member of any college of physicians, as in the case of the English College, he would, it appears, be entitled to charge also for his services in sur- gical cases as well as in pharmacy, when, as in the case of licen- tiates of the same College of Physicians of England, he may even compound and sell the medicine he prescribes, such privileges being reserved to the College, and wliere no restriction is contained in the licenses granted by it. — Attorncj-General \. Boyal College of Phy- sicians (ante). English Suegeons, etc. The various statutes which relate to the capacity of medical prac- titioners to sue are superseded, though not repealed, by the Medical Act. It is almost needless to observe that at this distance of time an 30 EIGHTS, PRIVILEGES, AND IMMUNITIES OF action is not likely to be brought for medical attendance, &c., given before the Act passed, otherwise it would not be necessary to prove registration in order to recover in such action. Wright v. Green- royd. 31 Law Journal (Q. B) 4. And further, it has been decided in Turner v. Eeynall, 14 Common Bench, N. S. 328, agreeing with the Irish Court of Exchequer in HafEeld v. Mackenzie, 10 Irish C. L. Eep. 289, that it is sufficient that the plaintiff be registered at the time of trial, although after the attendance, and even after action brought. If two medical practitioners are in partnership, and one alone is duly registered, they can jointly maintain an action for services rendered by the firm. Per Erie, C. J., and Byles, J., in Turner v. Eeynall, supra. Section 82, which gives no right of re- covery of any charge of any kind unless the claimant prove that he is duly registered, is not confined in its operations to actions against the patients themselves, but extends to a case where a third person had guaranteed payment for medicine, &e., or is primarily liable for it as supplied on his credit. So a medical practitioner, engaged by another to attend his patients in his absence, cannot recover tlie price of his services without proof of his registration -De la Eosa v. Prieto, 33 L. J. (C. P.) 262— but an unregistered assistant may recover his salary from a registered practitioner. S. C. per Cur. Even in the case of a promissory note given to plaintiff for medical attendance, in order to show consideration plaintiff must prove registration. Blogg v. Pinkers, Eyland and Moody, 125. Where the register specifies the department of practice, in respect of which the plaintiff is registered or qualified to practise questions may arise similar to those under the former Acts, e.gt., as to whether a person registered as qualified to practise as a surgeon can recover for attendance as a physician or apothecary. See Allison v. Haydon, 4 Bingham, 619 (in which it was held that a certificated surgeon could not recover for attending a patient in a fever without a certifi- cate from the Apothecaries Company). See also sections 30 and 31, under which a man registered with an inferior qualification, and having since obtained a higher one, may have that higher one added to his inferior qualification, and may then sue according to his newly-inserted qualification, in addition to his former one, provided his new and additional qualification is inserted in the register before action brought. Turners. Eeynall {ante). It is as well that it should be known that the superintendent of a railway station cannot, without express authority, make, the com- pany liable for a surgeon's bill for attendance upon a person injured by an accident on the railway : Cox v. Midland Counties Eaihvay, 3 Exch. Eep. 268 ; but then, should the sufferer succeed against the company, the surgeon's bill would be paid out of the damages obtained, as such is always allowed in damages {ih. per Baron DULY REGISTERED MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS. 31 Parke) ; but money paid to a medical man for a report on the plain- tift^'s coTidition would not be allowed in damaj^es : Deer v. London, Brighton, & South Coast liaihvay, Jan. 28, 1S70 (Q.B., cora;« Jus- tices Blackburn and llannen). If the defendant has received no benefit in consequence of the plaintifTs want of skill, it stands to reason the latter cannot recover : Kennen v. McMullen, Peake, N. P. 59 ; Duffit V. James, cited 7 East. 480. But, on the other hand, the remuneration of a practitioner who has used due skill and diligence does not depend on his effecting a cure. If the operation performed by a surgeon miijht have been useful though it has failed in the event, he is entitled to recover ; but otherwise if it could have been useful in no event. Per Baron Alderson, in Hill V. Peatheratouhaugh, 7 Bingham, 574. Apothecaeies, As licentiates of the Society of Apothecaries may be regis- tered, under schedule A as entitled to practise medicine, it is necessary briefly to consider the extent of their qualification and the amount of remuneration to which they are entitled. It was for some time considered, in consequence of a suggestion which pro- ceeded from Lord Tenterden, in 1830: Ilanhy \. Ilenson, -L Car. & P. 110, that the charge of two shillings and sixpence each for atten- dances, besides his charges for medicine, was the legal charge for an apothecary, but it seems that all that Lord Tenterden submitted to tlie jury was the reasonableness of such a charge, and that, subject to the opinion of a jury as to what is reasonable or unreasonable in each particular instance, an apothecary can make what reasonable charges he pleases for attendance in a medical case (INIorgan v. Hal- len, 3 Nevill & Perry, 498). Of course the custom of the profession would be taken into consideration in this as in every disputed demand made under any registered qualification, subject to the reasonableness of the charge. The production of the certificate of a licentiate of the Apothe- caries Society shall be sufficient proof that the party named therein has been, from the date of the certificate, duly qualified to practise : 14 & 15 Vict. c. 99, s. 7. This and proof of his registration under the new Act (extended by 23 & 24 Vict. c. 7, to 1st January, 1861), or, it is apprehended, registration alone, the registrar having satis- fied himself of the qualification (s. 2(5) will be suflicient to entitle him to recover. If he possesses only a suburban license and has infringed the law of his own society by practising without further permission within the Loudon precinct, he may be fined by the society ; but that is a matter of only fiscal regulation between the society and its members : Young v. Genger, 6 C. B. 541. 32 EIGHTS, PRIVILEGES, AND IMMUNITIES OF SUMMABY. The different qualifications entitling their possessors to recover at law their fees accordiug to their respective qualifications : — Fellows of the Boyal College of Physicians of London are bound by a bye-law of their College by which they are not entitled to sue for their fees. Memlers, Licentiates, and Extra Licentiates of the College may sue for their fees in medicine and surgery ; and, where not other- wise prohibited (as members), they may also recover for pharmacy and medicine compounded by themselves, and supplied to their patients. Fellovcs, Meinhers, and Licentiates of the Boyal College of Phy- sicians of Edinburgh are entitled to sue for their fees in medicine. Felloios and Licentiates of the King's and Queen's College of Phy- sicians of Ireland are entitled to sue for their fees in medicine. "Whether they could recover them in surgery and pharmacy is un- certain. The question must mainly depend on tbeir charter, granted by William and Mary in 1692. Fellows and Menihers of the Royal College of Surgeons of England may sue for their fees in surgery cases, and also for medical treat- ment, if ancillary to the removal of the surgical complaint. Licentiates in midwifery of this College can also sue for their fees in midwifery cases, and also, perhaps, for medical treatment, if an- cillary to midwifery cases. Fellows and Licentiates of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edin- hurgh can sue for their fees both in surgery and pharmacy (by their charter), and in medicine as ancillary to their attendance on surgery cases. Fellows and Licentiates of the Faculty of Physicians and Surgeons of Glasgow can sue for fees both in surgery and pharmacy, but the bodv is, by its charter, notwithstanding its name (granted by James yi. in 1599), only a College of Surgeons, yet the former observations respecting medical fees are applicable to this institution also. Fellows and Licentiates of the Royal College of Surgeons of Ire- land can sue for their fees in surgery, but it is thought not in phar- macy. The above remark on medical fees applies here likewise. Licentiates of the Society of Apothecaries, London, can sue for fees for medical attendance, as well as for the price of their medicine. Their exclusive privilege, extending over England and AV^ales, will enable them still to enforce a penalty of 20/. as against all unqualified persons. Licentiates of Apothecaries' Hall, BuUin, can sue in the same way as Licentiates of the Society of Apothecaries, London, and if, as is stated, they can legally practise surgery, they may, in addition, sue for surgical fees, but there is no evidence of this latter right. DULY REGISTERED MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS. 33 Their penalty of 20/. can still be enforced within their jurisdiction against all unqualified persons. Doctors, Bachelors, and Licentiates in Medicine of Oxford or Cam- Iridge University can sue for their fees in medicine. Masters in Surgery of either University , or those possessing the like diploma in Surgery of any University in the United Ki/agdom entitled to grant the same, can sue for their fees in surgery, and probably in medicine ; but the latter is doubtful except as ancillary to surgical treatment. Doctors and Bachelors of Medicine of the University of London can sue for their medical fees alone, but are expressly forbidden by the Medical Graduates Act to practise surgery, pharmacy, or midwifery. Medical Graduates of Durham University can sue for their fees in medicine. So can those of Trinity College, Duhlin. And all the Doctors of Medicine of the five Scotch Universities. These Universities do not grant the lower degree of Bachelor of Medicine. Doctors of Medicine hy Doctorate, granted hefore the passing of the Act hy the Archbishop of Canterhury, can sue for their medical fees. Also Doctors of Medicine of any foreign or colonial University or College, registered with the sanction of the Medical Council, can sue for their fees in medicine, if they had, previous to the passing of the Act, been practising in the United Kingdom as physicians. Likewise Surgeons, loho, previous to the passing of the Act, had practised in the United Kingdom on foreign or colonial diplomas, may sue, under similar circumstances, for their surgical fees, including ancillary medical attendance. And, those who have held appointments as Surgeons or Assistant- Surgeons in the Army, Navy, Militia, or the East Lndia Company, or are acting as Surgeons in the public service, or in the service of any charitable institution, may sue for their fees as surgeons, in like manner as above, and under similar circumstances. " Any person who icas actually practising medicine in England before the \st day of August, 1815," can sue for his fees as au apothecary. There is a large class known in non- professional language as " general practitioners," who, upon becoming registered in the double qualification, if they possess it, of surgeon and apothecary, enjoy the right of both classes of practitioners, and, indeed, any physician, it is presumed, if not forbidden by the bye-laws of his College, or any University medical graduate, may be registered in all three qualifications, should he possess them. If, however, he should claim them in right of his medical degree or diploma, it D 34 RIGHTS, PRIVILEGES, AND IMMUNITIES OF would be incumbent upon him to prove his right by virtue of the chartered constitution of his University or College. Medical graduates, if elected members of the College of Phy- sicians of London, of course enjoy all the privileges of that position, viz., of practising, if they think fit, in every branch of physic, though not in pharmacy, v^-hen by virtue of their mere medical degrees, they would be under limitations, varying according to the charters of their respective Universities. If further elected to the fellowships, they could no longer be able to recover their fees, being bound by the bye-law to that efiect. General Observations. Surgeons, being expressly excepted in the Apothecaries Act, have nevertheless, as before mentioned, been declared as entitled by law to administer medicines as ancillary to the removal of surgical com- plaints. Allison V. Haydon, 3 Carrington & Payne, 2i6 ; and Proud V. Mayall, 3 Dowling & Lowndes, 531. " The mere fact of the surgeon having supplied medicine, does not necessarily show that he practised as an apothecary, for a surgeon may lawfully do that if the medicines have been administered in the cure of a surgical case. But on the other hand, if a surgeon takes upon himself to cure a fever, he steps out of his lawful province, and is not authorized to administer medicine in such a case." Per Mr. Justice Cresswell in Apothecaries Company v. Latinga, 2 Moody & Robinson, 495. See also Simpson v. Ealfe, 4 Tyrwhitt, 325. In all the cases the judge has always decided the nature of the practice, leaving it for the jury to say in what character the practitioner had acted. Thus in Allisan v. Haydon, Chief Justice Best ruled that typhus fever was a medical, not a surgical case. " The pestilence, syphilis, and such other contagious diseases," have been declared (in England) by 32 Hen. VIII. c. 42, to be surgical cases ; also " letting of blood and drawing of teeth," in a word, " wounds, ulcers, fractures, dislocations, tumours " (charter of 5 Car. I., confirmed by 18 Geo. II., c. 15). In Battersby v. Lawrence (I Carrington & Marshman, 277), which related to a case of dropsy, the judge remarked, " It is said that the case was a surgical one ; but not so altogether." Small-pox, according to the legislative definition before mentioned, would appear to be a surgical as well as a medical case, it being both contagious and infectious. But after all, the real question is, as put to the jury by Lord Tenterden in the Coll. of Physicians v. Harrison, a.d. 1828, (MSS. at the College of Physicians,) " Has the party complained of practised as a physician ? Has he written prescriptions which are signed by him DULY REGISTERED MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS. 35 as a physician would sign them ? Has he practised physic, or has' he practised as a surgeon only ?" Such are the respective rights and privileges of all duly registered medical practitioners. The Medical Act also enacts that henceforth no one " shall hold any appointment as a physician, surgeon, or other medical officer, either in the military or naval service, or in emigrant or other vessels, or in any hospital, infirmary, dispensary, or lying-in hospital, not supported wholly by voluntary contribu- tions, or in any lunatic asylum, gaol, penitentiary, house of correc- tion, house of indnstr J, 2)arocJiiaI or union ivorkhouse, ov poorhouse, parish imion, or other public establishment, body, or institution, or to any friendly or other society for affording relief in sickness, infirmity, or old age, or as a medical officer of health, unless he be registered under this Act " (s. 36). But by s. 4 of 23 Vict., c. 7, " No person authorized to be registered, who shall be acting as a medical officer uuder an order of the Poor Law Commissioners, or Poor Law Board, shall be deemed to have been disqualified to hold such office, or any appointment mentioned as above (s. 3(3), unless he shall have failed to be registered on or before 1st January, 1861." And further, " No certificate required by any Act then in force or hereafter to be passed, from any physician, surgeon, licentiate in medicine and surgery, or other medical practitioner, shall be valid unless the person signing the same be registered under this Act " (s. 37) Medical Act. By the 35th section, " Every person who shall be registered, shall be exempt, if he shall so desire, from serv- ing on all juries and inquests whatsoever, and from serving all cor- porate, parochial, ward, hundred, and township offices, and from serving in the militia." d2 36 CHAPTEE lY. Section I. or THE LIABILITIES OE LEGALLY QIJALIEIED MEDICAL PRACTI- TIONERS, AKD THE DISABILITIES OE UNEEGISTEEED PEACTI- TIONERS — -ALSO OF THE MALPEACTICB OE BOTH QUALIFIED AND TJNQUALiriED PEESONS. The sections 35 & 36, quoted in the last chapter, imposing as they do disabilities on the unregistered and conferring correspond- ing privileges on the registered, practically compel the registration even of those who may be prohibited by their own bye-law from suing for their fees, as otherwise they would be ineligible for the appointments therein mentioned, neither could their certificates be received (s. 37). Moreover, unregistered persons are not entitled to the expenses of medical witnesses in courts of justice, or to make post mortem examinations, as under the provisions of 6 & 7 Wm. IV., c. 89, (Medical Witnesses Act) such persons must be " legally qualified," and by the 34th s. of the Medical Act the word " legally," or " duly qualified," " when used in auy Act of Parliament," shall be construed to mean a person registered under that Act. By the 40th section, any person who shall wilfully and falsely pretend to be, or take, or use the name or title of Phy- sician, Doctor of Medicine, Licentiate in Medicine and Surgery, Bachelor of Medicine, Surgeon, General Practitioner or Apothecary, or any name, title, addition, or description implying that he is regis- tered, or that he is recognised by law as a Physician, or Surgeon, or Licentiate in Medicine and Surgery, or a Practitioner in Medicine, or an Apothecary, shall upon a summary conviction for such ofience pay a sum not exceeding 201. In a case upon appeal from a decision of the Pinner Bench of Petty Set^sions under this section. Baron Bramwell said, " Assum- ing that the respondent was not a Doctor of Medicine, the question is whether he has assumed the title ' wilfully and falsely.' The section must be read as pointing to wilful falsity. No one can doubt that tlie respondent had a foreign diploma of some kind, and had on the strength of that called himself ' Dr. Kelly.' Is it to be said that he has wilfully and falsely pretended to be, or taken or used the name or title of ' Doctor of Medicine ' r"' Ellis v. Kelly, LIABILITIES OF LEGALLY QUALIFIED PRACTITIONERS. 57 30 Law Journal (M. C.) p. 35. In this case the respondent was registered as a Member of the College of Surgeons, England, and Licentiate of the Society of Apothecaries, London, but having a foreign diploma as a Doctor of Medicine of Erlangen, had previous to, and subsequent to the passing of the Medical Act called himself " Dr. Kelly." Judgment was given in his favour, with costs. It would seem then that a registered practitioner, clothed with a foreign medical degree, may assume its academical title, although not registered as such, if he is guilty of no wilful falsity. This remark would also apply to the degree of Doctor by Doctorate, granted by the Archbishop of Canterbury after the passing of the Medical Act, although such is no longer a qualification for registration. Section II, Negligence, in which though there is no criminal or dishonest conduct, but a gross want of that attention which the case of the patient requires, may be the subject of an action at law, and in point of fact is a serious misdemeanour, and offence at common law, "because," as Blackstone observes in his Commentaries, "it breaks the trust which the party had placed in his physician, and tends to the patient's destruction." Such was the decision in Dr. Gt-raenvelt's case, reported in 1 Lord Raymond, 213, 9 Wm. III. Ignorance is also a great misdemeanour at common law, whether in a licensed or unlicensed practitioner, and at the same time the injury arising to any individual from his being a victim to this practice is a private wrong, for which lie may recover adequate damages, but where a practitioner is a duly qualified practitioner, of course there is a considerable difficulty in fixing him with crassa ignorantia, however he may have erred in judgment. The circum- stance of qualification afibrds a presumption in favour of the practi- tioner which juries will consider in such cases. There is no doubt that owing either to the death of the only person who could main- tain the action, by the unskilful treatment, perhaps, of tlio medical practitioner, or the difficulty of producing the necessary evidence, which is obviously very great, or the hitherto uncertainty of medical practice, there has rarely occurred an opportunity of trying the point of the liability of the physician towards his patient for want of skill and attention, but the whole tenor of the books is that such an action can be supported. A physician, as such, is usually called upon on each distinct occasion, when his presence and aid are specially required, to counsel and direct those already in charge of the case. But the surgeon and apothecary, when undertaking the exclu- sive care of the patient, have been universally held responsible for 38 LIABILITIES OF LEGALLY QUALIFIED injuries arising from want of care and attention. Scare v. Prentice, 8 East 347-358. In fact, the rule is obvious that in all cases where damage accrues to another by the negligence, ignorance, or misbehaviour of a person in the duty of his trade or calling, an action will lie, as if a farrier kill a horse by bad medicines, or prick him in the shoeing. Butler's Nisi Prius, 73. " Again, ye are to distinguish of other manslayers, as of physi- cians, &c., for physicians and chirurgeons are skilful iii their faculties, and probably do lawful cures, having good consciences, so as nothing faileth to the patient which to their art belongetb : if their patients die they are not thereby menslayers or mayhemors ; but if they take upon them a cure, and have no knowledge or skill therein, or if they have knowledge, if nevertheless they neglect the cure, or minister that which is cold for hot, or take little care thereof, or neglect due diligence therein, if their patients die, they are menslayers or mayhemders." Mirror, c. 4, s. 16. But to recur to the authoritative cases. In Scare v. Prentice, (an action against a surgeon,) Lord Ellenborough, C. J., said " that an ordinary degree of skill is necessary in a surgeon who undertakes to perform surgical operations, in the same manner as it is necessary for any other man to have it in the course of his employment, and I am ready to admit that a surgeon would be liable for crassa ignorantia, and would be justly rcsponsibile in damages for having rashly adventured upon the exercise of a profession, without tbe ordinary qualification of skill, to the injury of a patient." Again in Slater v. Baker and Stapleton, 2 Wils. 359, an action against a surgeon and an apothecary for ignorance and unskilful- ness, tried before Chief Justice Wilmot, upon motion to set aside the verdict and damages which the plaintiff had obtained, the Court, without even hearing the counsel for the plaintiff, said : " He who acts rashly acts ignorantly : and although the defen- dants in general may be as skilful in their respective professions as any two gentlemen in England, yet the Court cannot help saying that in this particular case they have acted ignorantly and unskilfully, contrary to the known rule and usage of surgeons." The liability of the medical practitioner is no longer terminated with the death of his, in such cases, unfortunate patient, for by the 9 & 10 Vict., c. 93, s. 1 & 2, whenever the death of a person is caused by some wrongful act, neglect, or default which would (if death had not ensued) have entitled the injured party to an action, then the person who would have been liable if death had not ensued, shall be liable for damages, though the death was caused by an act amounting to felony : and the action shall lie for the benefit of the wife, husband, parent, and child of the MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS. 39 deceased, and in the name of the executor or administrator, and the word " parents " is exphxined in tlie Act to include lather, mother, grandfather, grandmother, stepfather, and stepmother, and the word " child," to include son, daughter, grandson, granddaughter, stepson, and stepdaughter. The esca])e from liability is thus rendered next to impossible ; and even the small weekly wages of a deceased son who contributed them towards the expenses of his parents' house, is evidence upon which the jury may act, though it is not shown that the sum contributed did more than cover the expense of the child's maintenance. Duckworth v. Johnson, 4 Hurlstone & Norton, 653. Proof must be given of a pecuniary loss through the death, sustained by the members of the family who sue, but the slightest pecuniary loss will support the action, or even a reasonable expectation of pecuniary advantage had the deceased lived, may be taken into consideration by the jury. London and South Eastern Eaihvay Company, 4 Common Bench (N.S.) 296. See also Franklin v. South Eastern Railway Company, 3 H. & N., 211. "We now come to the consideration of mala praxis, both in qualified and unqualified, registered and unregistered medical practitioners. Although a person may not be registered under the Act, he may nevertheless be qualified for registration, hut labouring under dis- abilities, and excluded from the enjoyment of the privileges attached to registration, at the same time neither a quack nor an impostor. Eor reasons best known to himself, he may not choose to be re- gistered, and yet may not be the subject of any penalties. On the other hand, many persons may still insist upon practising without even so much as a qualification, and may risk all penalties. Mal- practices, therefore, may still be very prevalent. Cases of great difficulty and nicety have hitherto arisen with regard to the question of legal malice, where medicines have been, carelessly or unskilfully administered by incompetent persons, and though they may be liable to action, it may at the same time be very difficult to render them amenable to the criminal law. Indeed it may not be always easy to fix them even with civil liability. The law on the criminal responsibility of every man in such cases, is thus laid down by Lord Hale : — - " If a physician gives a patient a potion without any intent of doing him any bodily hurt, but with intent to cure or prevent a disease, and contrary to the expectation of the physician, it kills him, this is no homicide ; and the like of a surgeon. And I hold their opinion to be erroneous that think, if it be no licensed surgeon or physician that occasions this mischance, then it is a ielony, for physic and salves were before licensed physicians and surgeons, and, therefore, if they be not licensed according to the statutes, they are 40 LIABILITIES OF LEGALLY QUALIFIED subject to the penalties in the statutes, but God forbid that any mischance of this kind should make any person not licensed guilty of murder or manslaughter." 1 Hale's Pleas of the Crown, 429. Upon the latter point Sir William Blackstone appears to agree witk Lord Hale. If a physician or surgeon, he says, gives his patient a potion or plaster to cure him, which, contrary to expectation, kills him, this is neither murder nor manslaughter, but misadventure, and he shall not be punished criminally, however liable he might formerly have been to a civil action for neglect or ignorance ; but it has been held, that if he be not a regular physician or surgeon who administers the medicine or performs the operation, it is man- slaughter at the least. Yet Sir Mattliew Hale very justly questions the law of this determination, 4 Bl. Com. c. 14. The correctness of Sir M. Hale's opinion has been recognised in many cases since. Thus in R. v. Van Butchell, 3 Carrington & Payne, 632, Baron Hullock said, that it made no difference whether the party was a regular or an irregular surgeon, adding that in remote parts of the country many persons would be left to die, if irregular surgeons were not allowed to practise. The same opinion was expressed by Justice Park, in a subsequent case, in which he observed that whether the party was licensed or unlicensed is of no consequence, except in this respect, that he may be subject to pecuniary penal- ties for acting contrary to charters or acts of parliament. E. v. Long, 4 C. & P. 398. But whether the party be licensed or un- licensed, if he displays gross and culpable ignorance, or criminal inattention, or culpable rashness in the treatment of his patient, he is criminally responsible. There is no doubt, said Mr. Baron HuUock, that there may be cases where both regular and irregular surgeons may be liable to an indictment, as there may be cases where from the manner of the operation, even malice might be inferred. E. v. Van Butchell. Where a person, who though not educated as a surgeon, had been in the habit of acting as a man- midwife, and had unskilfully treated a woman in childbirth, in con- sequence of which she died, was indicted for the murder. Lord Ellenborough said that to substantiate the charge, the prisoner must have been guilty of criminal misconduct, arising either from the grossest ignorance or the most criminal inattention. One or other of these was necessary to make out a case of manslaughter. E. V. Williamson, 3 C. & P. 635. And this ruling was cited with approbation by Justice Park in the case above quoted, E. v. Long. But where a person, grossly ignorant, undertook to deliver a woman and killed the child in the course of the delivery, it was resolved by the judges that he was rightly convicted of manslaughter. E. v. Senior, 1 Moody ; Criminal Cases, 346. The rule with regard to the degree of misconduct, which will render a person practising MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS. 41 medicine criminally answerable, is thus laid down by Mr. Justice Bayley : " It matters not whether a man has received a medical education or not. The thing to look at is, whether in reference to the remedy he has used, and the conduct he has disjdayed, he has acted with a due degree of caution, or on the contrary, has acted with gross and improper rashness and want of caution. I have no hesitation in saying, that if a man be guilty of gross negligence in attending to his patient, after he has applied a remedy, or of gross rashness in the application of it, and death ensues in consequence, he will be liable to a conviction for manslaughter. E,. v. Long. In a case tried at the Lancaster Assizes, March 14, 1829, viz., R. v. Simpson, 4 Car. & Payne, 407, and 1 Lewin, Crim. Cases, 172, prisoner was indicted for manslaughter. It appeared that the deceased, who was suffering from salivation, went, upon the recom- mendation of an acquaintance, to the prisoner, an old woman at Liverpool, for an emetic to get the mercury out of his bnnes. She gave him a solution of corrosive sublimate, one dose of which caused his death. Mr. Justice Bayley, in addressing the jury, said : " I take it to be perfectly clear, that if a person, not of a medical education, in a case where professional aid ought to be obtained, undertakes to administer medicines which may have a dangerous effect, and thereby occasions death, such person is guilty of man- slaughter. He may have no evil intention, and may have a good one, but he has no right to hazard the consequences in a case where medical assistance may be obtained. If he does so, it is at his own peril. It is immaterial whether the person administering the medi- cine prepares it, or gets it from another." Mr. Baron Bolland in another case, said : " The law, as I am bound to lay it down, as it has been agreed upon by the judges, is this : if any person, whether he be a regular or licensed medical man or not, professes to deal with the life or health of his majesty's subjects, he is bound to have competent skill to perform the task that he holds himself out to pei'form, and he is bound to treat his patients with care and atten- tion and assiduity." R. v. Spiller, 5 Car. & Payne, 333. In a case of this kind, before Lord Chief Justice Tindall, his lordship said to the jury : " You are to say whether in the execution of the duty which the prisoner had undertaken to perform, he is proved to have shown such a p^oss want of care, or such a (/ross and culpable want of skill, as any person undertaking such a charge ought not to be guilty of, and that the death of the person named in the indictment was caused thereby." R. v. Ferguson, 1 Lewin, C. C. 181. In a case which occurred before Lord Lyndhurst, when Chief Baron, the law on the subject was thus laid down : — " I agree that in these cases there is no diHerence between a licensed physician or surgeon, and a person acting as physician or surgeon without a license. In 42 LIABILITIES OF LEGALLY QUALIFIED PEACTITIONEES. either case, if a party having a competent degree of skill or know- ledge makes an accidental mistake in his treatment of a patient, through which death ensues, he is not thereby guilty of man- slaughter ; but, if where proper assistance can be had, a person, totally ignorant of the science of medicine, takes upon himself to administer a violent and dangerous remedy to one labouring under disease, and death ensues in consequence of that dangerous remedy having been so administered, that he is guilty of manslaughter. I shall leave it to the jury to say whether death was accelerated or occasioned by the medicine administered, and if they say it was, then I shall tell them that the prisoner is guilty of manslaughter, if they think that in so administering the medicine, he acted either with a criminal intention, or from any gross ignorance." E.. v. Webb, 1 Moody & Eobinson, 405. The next case is that of a person who had for nearly thirty years carried on the business of an apothecary and man-midwife in the county of York, and was duly qualified by law for that profession. His practice was very considerable, and he had attended the de- ceased on the birth of all her children. It appeared that on the occasion in question he made use of a metal instrument, known in midwifery by the name of a vectis or lever, inflicting thereby such grievous injuries on the person of the deceased as to cause her death within three hours. It was proved by the medical witnesses that the instrument was a very dangerous one, and that at that period of the labour it was very improper to use it at all ; and also, that it must have been used in a very improper way, and in an en- tirely wrong direction. Mr. Justice Coleridge told the jury that the questions for them to decide were, whether the instrument had caused the death of the deceased, and whether it had been used by the prisoner with due and proper skill and caution, or with gross want of skill or gross want of attention. No man was justified in making use of an instrument in itself a dangerous one, unless he did so with a proper degree of skill and caution. If the jury thought that in this instance the prisoner had used the instrument with great want of skill, or gross want of caution, and that the deceased had thereby lost her life, it would be their duty to find him guilty. The prisoner was convicted. E. v. Spilling, 2 Moody & Eobinson, 107. A chemist, likewise, who negligently supplies a wrong drug, in consequence of which death ensues, is guilty of manslaughter. The apprentice to a chemist by mistake delivered a bottle of lauda- num to a customer who asked for paregoric ; and a portion of the laudanum being administered to a child, caused its death. The apprentice was indicted for manslaughter, and the jury, under the direction of Mr. Justice Bayley, that if they thought him guilty of negligence, they should find him guilty of manslaughter, did so. E. V. Tessymond, 1 Lewis, C. C. 100. 43 CHAPTER V. CHARACTEU — DEFAMATION. A EEQTJLAK professional practitiouer is perhaps more entitled to protection against defamation and libel than a private person, be- cause it tends to injure him in his profession. He is entitled to recover a pecuniary compensation against any person who, without reference to his private character, has maliciously imputed to him, either by words or writing, a want of qualification, attention, skill, or capacity, or any misconduct by which he is likely to be prejudiced iu the profits of his profession. At a very early period slander was recognised as an individual WTong, and an offence against the public peace. In its primitive legal acceptation it was applied solely to words spoken ; libel, or written defixmation, among an unlettered people being scarcely known ; but the term slander has since been used to embrace written as well as oral defamation. In Bacon's "Abridgment" slander is defined to be the publishing of words in writing or by speaking ; by means of which the person to whom they relate be- comes liable to suffer some corporal punishment, or to sustain some damage. " If a man, by letter, write slander of another to a third person," an action lies. 1 Anderson, 119. Again, in " BuUer's Nisi Prius," slander is defined as " the defaming a man in his repu- tation by speaking or writing words which affect his life, office, or trade ; or which tend to his loss of preferment in marriage or ser- vice, or to his disinheritance, or which occasion any other particular damage." The term will, therefore, be used in this work as com- prehending oral as well as written defamation, except where other- wise defined. By the common law of England reputation is ac- knowledged as an inherent personal right. Revenge is forbidden, and even the tongue, that " auruly member," is restrained. Cha- racter is treated as the safeguard of social position and success in life, and professional reputation, as an absolute individual right, not to be assailed with impunity. According to Lord Camden, " If the words be true, they are no slander, and may be justified." 2 Wils. 301. Blackstone says, " If the defendant be able to justify and prove the words to be true, no action will lie, even though special damage 44 CHARACTER— DEFAMATION. have ensued, for there it is no slander or false tale" Bl, Comm., vol. 3, p. 125. According to this authority also, libels are defined to be " any writings, pictures, or other signs, which immediately tend to injure the character of the individual, or to occasion mis- chief to the public." Each individual, whatever be his talents, his rank, or his station, is more or less dependent on others for security of person, property, or even life. He must trust his lawyer for the preservation of his property, his physician in time of sick- ness, and his servants for the faithful discharge of the meaner duties of life. Character, therefore, is the most valuable personal right of each. The right, then, of every man to the character and reputa- tion which his conduct deserves, stands on the same footing with his right to the enjoyments of life, liberty, health, property, and all the comforts and advantages which appertain to a state of civil society. Slander, or in its more primitive sense oral defamation, is an injury for which an action will lie ; but an indictment will not lie for mere words not reduced into writing (2 Salkeld, 417, Eex. v. Langley, 6 Modern Eeports, 125), unless they be seditious, blas- phemous, grossly immoral, or addressed to a magistrate whilst in the execution of his duties, or uttered as a challenge to fight a duel, or with the intention to provoke another to send a challenge to fight a duel (E. v. Phillips, 6 East. 464). Libel, or written defamation, is in the eye of the law of a greater and more aggravated nature than slander, by means of the more durable publicity which may thus be given to the defamatory matter, and the deliberation of the defamer in reducing the slander to writing. Two remedies are therefore given in libel : one by criminal procedure against the libeller, the other a civil remedy for damages by action at law. Actionable slander therefore consists of the maliciously defaming a person in his character, reputation, dignity, profession, trade, or ofilce, by words or signs — as to say of another, " He forged his master's name to a cheque on his master's bankers ;" or by signs — as by significant motions of the hands and fingers, as to impute an unnatural or other crime to a person. Or to say that a man has poisoned another, or is perjured ; or to charge him with having an infectious disease, the tendency of which would exclude him from society ; or to call a tradesman a bankrupt, a physician a quach, or a lawyer a knave. 3 Bl. Comm. 123, Brown v. Smith, 23 " Law Journal" (Com. Pleas), 151 ; 13 Com. Bench Eep. 596. The communication must be malicious^ but only in a technical or legal sense, as merely signifying the absence of any legal justifica- tion or excuse. In ordinary actions of slander express malice, therefore, need not be proved (Maitland v. Goldney, 2 East, 426) ; CHARACTER— DEFAMATION. 45 it is to be implied from the slander itself (Bacon's Abridgment, Tit. Slander, D). And the action is maintainable without proof of special damage. It is essential, however, that the imputation should be false, but the law allows the truth of the words to form a justification in an action for slander. But the plaintiff is entitled to the presumption of innocence in his favour, and is not required to prove the falsity of the alleged calumny. The consequences of the slander must he to occasion some injury or loss to the plaintiff in law or in fact. But no proof of special damage is required in the following cases : — 1. If an indictable offence be imputed. 2. If a contagious or infectious disorder be imputed. 3. If any injurious imputation be made affecting the plaintiff in his office, profession, or business. In these cases, as the immediate tendency of the slander is to produce great and irreparable injury to the party whose character is assailed, even though none can be proved, or at least proved in time, so as to save the party perhaps from absolute ruin, the law considers the very publication of the slander to be injurious, and to confer a substantive right of action. In all other cases the plaintiff must prove the damage which he has sustained from the words. Where an action is brought for words spoken of a barrister or a physician, it must appear that he practised as such at the time the words were spoken (7 Bac. Abridgment, 269, ih. 271), for other- W'ise the words could not have affected him professionally. It is no slander to say of a person who is unlawfully practising in England as a physician, that he is a quack, or an impostor, or an unqualified person (Collins v. Carnegie, 1 Adolphus & Ellis, 095). It does not, however, follow, that in an action for defamation brought by a medical practitioner, that he should not be able to recover damages because he is not registered under the Medical Act. In such case, if his qualification be denied, it must be proved by the production of his diploma, or in any other manner in which before the passing of the Act such qualification might have been proved. As men- tioned in a former part of this work-, a practitioner may be qualified though not registered, and whatever may be his disabilities as a non-registered practitioner, they do not affect his qualification. A doubt has been raised whether damages are properly recoverable by physicians for words relating to their profession, since their fees are merely honorary (Brown v. Kennedy, 33 " Law Journal," Ch. 3i2) ; but now by the 31st section of the Medical Act all registered prac- titioners, physicians included, can recover their fees unless the latter are prohibited by a bye-law of their College ; the actual deci- 46 CHARACTER — DEFAMATION. sions, even before the passing of the Act, leave no doubt upon the subject (3 AVilson, 59) ; and even if their situation be considered as merely confidential, their right to recover rests upon the same foundation with that of magistrates and others, whose oiSces are of a similar description. The words are actionable if they impute any want of knowledge, skill, or diligence, in the exercise of an office or vocation ; as to say of a surgeon, " I wonder you had him to attend you. Several have died that he has attended, and there have been inquests held upon them." These words were held actionable with- out the aid of an innuendo (Southee v. Denny, 1 Exch. Rep. 196) . So also the words — "He is a bad character. None of the medical men here will meet him," are actionable, as imputing the want of a necessary qualification for a surgeon in the ordinary discharge of his professional duties {lb. p. 202). So also to say of an apothecary, " It is a world of blood he has to answer for in this town ; through his ignorance he did kill a woman and two children at Southampton ; he did kill J. P. at Petersfield ; he was the death of J. P. ; he has killed his patient with physick." (Tutty v. Alewin, 11 Modern Eep. 221.) To say of a physician that he is " no scholar," is actionable, a learned education being considered to be an essential qualification in the medical profession (7 Bac. Abridgment, 269). So where the defendant said of a midwife (Flower's case, Cro. Car. 211), "Many have perished for her want of skill." In actions for slander in which no indictable offence is imputed, but merely an immoral one, the Courts have always regarded them with jealousy, even though the words were spoken of the plaintiff in his profession or business. In most of these cases the Courts have required proof of special damage in order to sustain such actions ; the exception being in the case of beneficed clergymen. Libel, or written slander, is a species of defamation, as has been said, of a more aggravated form, and, for the reasons before men- tioned, has always been treated as a more grievous injury than that of verbal defamation ; and is therefore the subject of an indictment or criminal information as a criminal offence against society at large, as well as of an action at law for the civil injury inflicted on the individual. A libel may be expressed by-printing, writing, signs, or pictures. The libel may be contained in any book, letter, placard, pamphlet, or indeed printing or writing of any kind, even on a wall or post .- Austen v. Colpepper, Skinner, 123. It may also be expressed by signs, types, or pictures ; as to affix a gallows or other reproachful or ignominious sign at a person's door: JefFeries v. Duncombe, 11 East, 226 ; or by a pictui-e : 11 Modern Eep. 99, per Chief Justice Holt ; or by caricature : Du CHARACTER — DEFAMATION. 47 Bost V. Beresford, 2 Campbell, 511, per Lord Eilcnborough, C.J. ; or by exhibiting a person in any shameful or disgraceful position, or in the company of disreputable persons : 5 Coke, 125 ; Skinner, 123 ; Eaymond, 431; 3 Keb, 378. In an action by a physician for words imputing adultery to him, the words were alleged to have been spoken of him " in his profes- sion;" no special damage was laid. After verdict for the plaintiff judgment was arrested on the ground that such words, alleged merely to be spoken of the plaintiff " in his profession," were not actionable without special damage ; and that, if spoken so as to con- vey an imputation upon his conduct in his profession, the declara- tion ought to show how the speaker connected the imputation with the professional conduct, Ayre v. Craven, 2 Adolphus & Ellis, 7 ; and see Southee v. Denny, 1 Exch. 202 (ante). This case, it seems then, was determined upon a legal technicality and not upon the merits. Upon a distinct finding of a jury, that the words were not spoken w^th reference to the plaintiff's profession, but that they had a " tendency to injure him morally and professionally," it was held that upon this finding the words were not actionable. Dayley v. Eoberts, 3 Bingham's New Cases, 835. As in the case of oral slander, so in the case of written slander, or libel, affecting a person in his office, profession, trade, or business, an action will lie without proof of actual malice or special damage. It will not be necessary to cite cases here which apply equally to this species of defamation whether the action be for words spoken merely, or deliberately written. It is at the same time evident from the authorities that words written, tending to disparage a man in his profession, will suppoi't an action when the same words spoken will not. The law, however, respects communications made in confidence, even though they be false and erroneous, and may tend to injure the party referred to, so long as they are not malicious, nor, under the cloak of private confidence, are intended to defame. But, in the case of a public officer, the motives under which he acts in doing a duty which it is incumbent upon him to do cannot make the doing of tliat duty actionable, however malicious they may be. Dawkins v. Paulet, 21 Law Times Eep. N.S. 584, Q.B. Although this was an action by a military officer against his superior, the rule is equally applicable to medical officers. It has been held that to write and publish of a physician that he has met homoeopathists in consultation is no libel, though it be alleged in the declaration that, in the opinion of the profession, meeting homcGopathists in consultation would be a breach ot" profes- sional etiquette, and injurious to the professional character, reputa- tion, and practice of a pliysician. Clay v. Eoberts, 2 Jurist (N. S.) 48 CHARACTER — DEFAMATION. 580. When a medical practitioner, by way of advertisement, pub- lished large portions of his book, occupying from time to time whole columns of the Times and other newspapers, the effect of which was to represent to the public that he was in possession of a specific remedy for the cure of consumption, the defendant, in commenting thereon with bitterness and severity, denounced the author as an impostor and a quack ; and also (by reason of the plaintiff describing himself as M.D. when he had only an American diploma) as like " scoundrels who utter base and forged coin :" and there being evi- dence that the plaintiff's publications contained statements that were fallacious, delusive, exaggerated, and alarming, it was held that the subject of the plaintifi''s publications and representations was matter of public interest and public concern, and a fair and proper subject for public comment ; and that if the defendant in comment- ing thereon as a public writer really believed them to be fallacious, delusive, &c., he was justified in asserting that they were so ; and that if in drawing therefrom inferences of imposture and bad intention, he fell into error, yet if he wrote honestly and with the intention of exercising his vocation as a public writer fairly, and with reason- able moderation and judgment, he was privileged by the occasion. Hunter v. Sharpe, 4 F. & F. 983. And it was observed by Chief Justice Cockburn, in his charge to the jury: — "Here is a man challenging public criticism, by bringing forward what professes to be a new system of treatment, and inviting the public to adopt it as the only means of curiug the most destructive disease known among us. In doing this he challenges public criticism, and if a public writer, using a reasonable degree of temper and moderation, as behoves any one who makes imputations upon others, — if a public writer, thus discussing the subject in the exercise of his vocation, falls into error /is to the facts or the inferences, and goes beyond the limits of strict truth, he is nevertheless privileged. The occasion is a privileged one, and if the privilege is exercised honestly, faithfully, and with reasonable regard to what truth and justice require, then, though he may exceed the limits of what he can logically prove to be the truth, he is protected from liability. It is not, therefore, necessary that the justification should appear to you to be made out, if you think that the defendant, or the writer, was in the reasonable and honest exercise of his vocation as a public writer, even although he was not fully warranted in drawing the inferences he did as to the conduct of the plaintiff, and though it may be that he was not entirely justified by the absolute truth." {lb.) In the case of words published by writing it is only necessary that they should be calculated to degrade or disparage the plaintiff, and hold him up to ridicule or contempt, in order to make them actionable. CHARACTER — DEFAMATION, 49 With respect to the evidence in support of a Criminal informa- tion or indictment, whatever is a suflicieut publication of a libel to entitle a plaintilf in a civil action to a verdict, is equally so in a criminal proceeding, with this addition, that the sending of a libel to the individual reflected on, without exposing its contents to a third person, is a sufiicient publication to support an indictment, on account of its tendency to provoke that individual to commit a breach of the peace. 1 Wms. Saund. 132 n. 2 ; 2 Esp. 226 ; 5 Mod. 163. And the defendant may be found guilty of the publishing, and acquitted of the composing or printing of a libel, where both are conjointly alleged. R. v. Hunt and another, 2 Camp. 583 ; R. V. Hart, 10 East. 94. Until recently, there was a great distinction between justifications in civil and criminal proceedings for libel. In the former, the truth of the defamatory matter was a ground of justification, in the latter it was not. The truth is a justification in a civil action, principally because the very foundation fails on which the claim to damages might otherwise be erected — that foundation being the falsity of the defamatory matter. On the other hand, the tendency of the defamation to produce a breach of the peace, is of the essence of the off'ence as far as the public are concerned ; and, therefore, the truth or falsity of the publication is collateral to the oflenee, and it is obvious that the imputation may be not the less provoking because it is true. An important alteration has however been made in the law in this respect by a comparatively recent statute (6 & 7 Vict., c. 96), by section 6 of which Act it is enacted, that on the trial of any indictment or information for a deftimatory libel, the defendant having pleaded such plea as thereinafter mentioned, the truth of the matter charged may be inquired into but shall not amount to a defence, unless it was for the public benefit that the said matters charged should be published ; and that, to entitle the defendant to give evidence of the truth of such matters charged as a defence to such indictment or information, it shall be necessary for the defendant, in pleading to the said indictment or information, to allege the truth of the said matters charged, in the manner now required in pleading a justification in an action for defamation ; and further to allege that it was for the public benefit that the said matters charged should be published ; to which plea the prosecutor shall be at liberty to reply generally, denying the whole thereof ; and that if after such plea, the defendant shall be convicted, it shall be competent to the Court, in pronouncing sentence, to con- sider whether the guilt of the defendant is aggravated or mitigated by the plea in question. So that even now in criminal proceedings £ 50 CHARACTER — DEFAMATION. tlie truth of the libel is no defence unless it was for the public benefit that the matters charged should be published. And it may be added that whenever the publication of a libel is criminal as concerns the public, it constitutes also a civil injurj reparable in damages at the suit of the party calumniated. If a person, who has either read a libel himself, or who heard it read by another, afterwards maliciously reads or repeats any part of it to another, he is guilty of an unlawful publication of it. Hawkins' Pleas of the Crown 62 c. 73 s. 10. But the so reading it without knowing it to be a libel, with or without malice, does not amount to a publication. E. V. Dodd, 2 Sessions Cases 33 ; Holt's Law of Libel 284, 2nd Edit. "Where a libel is printed, the sale of each copy is a distinct pub- lication, and a fresh offence, and a conviction for one such offence will be no bar to an indictment for publishing another copy. E. V. Carlile, 1 Chitty 451 ; 2 Starkie on Slander 320, 2nd Edit. Where a man publishes a writing upon the face of it libellous, the law presumes that he did so with a malicious intent, and it is unnecessary for the prosecution to give evidence of circumstances from which malice may be inferred. E. v. Harvey, 2 Barnewall and Cresswell 257 ; E. v. Burdett, 4 Barnewall and Adolphus 95. Where, however, the expressions are ambiguous, or the intentions doubtful, evidence may be adduced for showing the malice which prompted the publication. In the case of servants' or assistants' characters, such communi- cations are privileged where made to persons who have a right to ask it or expect it. In all such cases malice in fact must be proved. Per Justice Bayley in Bromage v. Prosser, 4 B. & C.256 ; MoPher- son V. Daniels, 10 B. & C. 272 : " Where a man has a right to make a communication you must either show malice intrinsically from the language of the letter, or prove express malice. Per Baron Parke, Wright v. Woodgate, Tyrrwhitt & Gr. 15. And wher- ever an action will lie for a libel without laying special damage, an indictment will also lie. And also wherever an action will lie for verhal slander without laying special damage, an in- dictment will lie for the same words if reduced to writing and published ; but the converse of this proposition will not hold good, for an indictment may lie for words written which could not be maintained if merely spoken. Thorley v. Lord Kerry, 4 Taunton 355 ; for instance, if a man write or print and publish of another that he is a scoundrel or villain it is a libel ; although if this were merely spoken, it would not be actionable without special damage. 2 H. Blackstone 531. An instance of special damage is the following :— In an action by a surgeon or accoucheur, for slander imputing to him, in words spoken to D, that a female servant had a child by him ; whereby (as CHARACTER— DEFAMATION. 51 special damage) D would not employ him as an accoucheur to attend his wife, and the declaration alleged that the plaintiff was otherwise injured in his business, and that the profits thereby had been dimi- nished : it was held that the plaintiff's damages were not limited to the mere loss of the fee for attending D's wife in her confinement, and that the jury might give damages for the loss of business arisin-T directly from the slander spoken by the defendant to D, but that he was not entitled to such general damages as might be supposed to have arisen from repetition of the slander by other persons. Dixon V. Smith, 5 Hurlstoue & JSTorman 451. 29 Law Journal (Exch.) 125. It may here be mentioned that by the 19 & 20 Vict., c. 108, s. 23 (County Courts Extension Act), any action for libel or slander may be tried in a county court by consent of both parties to a memorandum to that effect signed by them or their respective attorneys, and specifying the county court in which they agree to try the action. And by the County Court Act of 1867 (30 & 31 Vict., c. 112), it is enacted by section 5, that in any case of tort, where the action is brought in a superior court, and the plaintiff does not recover damages exceeding 10/., he will not be entitled to costs, unless the judge certifies that there was sufficient reason for bringing the action in the superior court. But no original jurisdiction is given to the county court in actions of libel or slander, so that an agree- ment between the parties is still required in order to try such cases in the county court. But by the 10th section of the same Act, any person against whom any action for libel or slander is brought in a superior court, may make an affidavit that the plaintiff has no visible means of paying the costs of the defendant, should a verdict be not found for the plaintiff, and thereupon a judge of the court in which the action is commenced may make an order that unless the plaiutift' shall, within a time to be therein named, give full security for the defeiulant's costs, or satisfy the judge that he has a cause of action fit to be tried in a superior court, all proceedings in the action are to be stayed ; or in the event of the plaintiff not giving such security or not so satisfying the judge, that the cause be remitted for trial before a county court to be therein named ; and the county court so named is to have all the same powers and jurisdiction as if both parties had agreed by a memorandum signed by them that the county court should liave power to try the action ; and the costs of the parties incurred subsequent to the order of the judge of the superior court are to be allowed according to the scale of costs in use in the county courts. There can be no doubt that this provision will materially diminish, if not entirely get rid of a class of vexatious actions, brought either E 2 52 CHARACTER — DEFAMATION. to compel a compromise, or for the sake of costs, for thus whatever may be the amount of damages claimed the plaintiff is forced into the county court, and cannot therefore either gratify his attorney's avarice or his own vindictiveness by inflicting a high scale of costs upon his opponent, where such unworthy motives have prompted the litigation. As vindication of character is the main object of legal proceedings for defamation, except where special and serious pecuniary loss has been sustained through the publication of the defamatory matter, the defendant is permitted by 6 & 7 Vict., c. 96, in actions for libel only, tried either in the superior or the county court, to give in evidence (after due notice in writing of his intention so to do, given before trial) in mitigation of damages, that he made or offered an apology to the plaintiff before the commencement of the action, or as soon afterwards as he had an opportunity to do so, in case the action were commenced before he had an opportunity of offering such apology. Such a privilege, however, is limited to cases of libel only and does not apply to slander, and exclusively to such libels as are contained in any public newspaper or other periodical, and such plea must be accompanied by the payment of money into court by way of amends, otherwise the plea shall be deemed a nullity ; sec. 2. The defendant is not, therefore, allowed to escape altogether a pecuniary penalty, and he must also state in such plea that such libel was published without actual malice and without gross negli- gence, otherwise it will not avail him. 53 CHAPTEE VI. LAW or COPTEIGHT, ESPECIALLY AS APPLIED TO -WRITINGS AND LECTTJBES OF MEDICAL MEN. The subject of copyright is far too extensive to be discussed at any length in these pages, but a few observations on tlie rights of medical men especially, may nevertheless be useful and within the object as well as the limits assigned to this treatise. The term copyright includes two rights — the right exists in every unpublished innocent production of art, literature, or science, and may be termed copyright before publication. It exists a fortiori in every such published production, and may be termed copyright after publica- tion. In reference to the first of these, viz., copyright before pub- lication, it may be said generally that when any material has embodied the ideas which spring up in the mind of the author or the artist, the law protects their privacy until the material has itself been, by its owner, given to the world. In the language of Mr. Justice Yates, 4 Burrows, 2378, " A man has certainly tlie right to consider whether he will make his ideas public, or commit them only to the sight of his friends ; in that state a manuscript is in every sense bis peculiar property, and no man can take it from him, or make a use of it which he has not authorized, without being guilty of a violation of his property. And as every author or proprietor of a manuscript has a right to determine whether he will publish it or not, he has a right to the first publication, and whoever deprives him of that privilege is guilty of a manifest wrong, and the Court have a right to stop it." In the case of Abernethy v. Hutchinson, 3 Law Journal (Chan- cery), 209, 213, 219, Mr. Abernethy had filed a bill to restrain the publication in the Lancet of certain lectures delivered by him orally at St. Bartholomew's Hospital. Lord Eldon refused to grant the injunction, because the plaintiff was unable to swear that his whole lecture had been reduced to writing at the date of its delivery. Lord Eldon observed : " "Where the lecture is orally delivered, it is difficult to say that an injunction can be granted upon the same prin- ciple upon which literary composition is protected, because the Court must be satisfied that the publication complained of is an invasion of the work, and this can only be done by comparing the 54 LAW OF COrYRIGHT. compositiou with the piracy." His lordship, however, upon a second argument, granted the relief prayed, but on a diflerent ground, viz., that of a breach of an implied contract between the lecturer and his audience, that the latter would do nothing more than listen to the lecture for their instruction. The earliest case of an infringe- ment of copyright before publication, appears to be Webb v. Eose, cited ia Burrows, 2330, which was decided in the year 1732. Sir Joseph Jekyli, Master of the Eolls, there granted an injunction against a conveyancer's clerk, when he threatened to publish his master's conveyancing drafts as legal precedents, not having first obtained the draftsman's permission. Forrester v. Waller, cited as supra, is a somewhat similar case ; an injunction was granted against printing without his consent the plaiutiff''s notes of cases. Again, in 1754, a clerk of Sir John Strange made a clandestine abridg- ment of his master's MSS., with a view to publish them. Lord Hardwicke did not hesitate to restrain such publication. The Prince Albert v. Strange is almost the only modern case, as it is the most leading case on copyright before publication. As etchings or lithographic sketches or pliotographic pictures may sometimes form the private collection of a medical practitioner's professional experiences, the result perhaps of much labour and investigation, whicli he may or may not purpose some day giving to the world, a brief narration of the facts of Prince Albert v. Strange may not be here out of place. Her Majesty and the Prince had, solely for their own amusement, made certain etchings, and from these they had struck off a few lithographic impressions for their own use, and not for the purpose of publication ; other impressions they had oi-dered to be struck oif, and some of these latter had been surreptitiously retained by one of the pressmen employed in the operation, and from him they had passed into the possession of the defendant, a London publisher, who declared his intention of pub- licly exhibiting them, and also of selling to the public a descriptive catalogue of the lithographs. The injunction w^as granted by the Yice-Chancellor, and on appeal his judgment was afl&rmed by Lord- Chancellor Cottenham. An extract from the judgment of the Vice- Chancellor may not be uninteresting to those to whom perhaps the doctrine of copyright before publication is not as yet familiar. " Upon the principle," said the Vice-Chancellor, " of protecting property, it is that the Common Law, in cases not aided nor preju- diced by statute, shelters the privacy and seclusion of thoughts and sentiments committed to writing, and desired by the author to remain not generally known. Such then being, as I believe, the nature and foundation of the Common Law as to manuscripts, its operation cannot of necessity be confined to literary subjects. That would be to limit the rule by its example. Wherever the LAW OF COPnUGIIT. 55 produce of labour is liable to iuvasiou in an analogous manner, there must, I suppose, be a title to analogous protection or redress. To consider, then, the case of mechanical works, or works of art executed by a man for his private amusement, or private use, what- ever protection they may have by act of parliament, they are not, I apprehend, deserted by the Common Law. The principles and rules which it applies to manuscripts must, I conceive, be to a cou- siderable extent, at least, applicable to these also. Mr. Justice Yates, in Millar v. Taylor, said that an author's case was exactly similar to that of an inventor of a new mechanical machine ; that both original inventions stood upon the same footing in point of property, whether the case were mechanical or literary, whether an epic poem or an orrery ; that the immorality of pirating another man's invention was as great as that of purloining his ideas. Property in mechanical works, or works of art, executed by a man for his own amusement, instruction, or use, is allowed to subsist certainly, and may before publication by him be invaded, not merely by copying, but by description, or by catalogue, as it appears to me. A catalogue of such works may in itself be valuable. It may also as ellectually show the bent and turn of the mind, the feelings and taste of the artist, especially if not professional, as a list of his papers. The portfolios of the studio may declare as much as the writing table." This extract will perhaps be sufficient to elucidate the principle involved in the decision. No one can have copyright before publication in a work calcu- lated by publication to do injury to society and to offend against the law. The law on this point was very fully discussed in Lawrence v. Smith, 2 Merivale, 440. Tlie plaintiff, the eminent surgeon, had delivered at the College of Sugeous, and had afterwards published, a work under the title of " Lectures on Physiology, Zoology, ana the IS'atural History of Man." The bill was filed to restrain the defendant from selling a pirated edition. An ex parte injunction having been obtained, the defendant moved to dissolve it, on the ground that the lectures were so hostile to natural and revealed religion, that they ought to have no protection. Lord Eldon dis- solved the injunction, and in doing so said, among other things, " Looking at the general tenor of the work, and at many particu- lar parts of it, recollecting that the doctrine of the immortality of the soul is one of the doctrines of the scriptures, considering that the law does not give protection to tliose who contradict the scrip- tures ; and entertaining a doubt, I think a rational doubt, whether the book does not violate that law, I cannot continue the injunc- tion," On similar grounds. Lord Eldon refused the motion for an injunction to restrain the publication of a pirated edition of Lord 56 LAW OF COPYRIGHT. Byron's " Cain," and Sir John Leacli, Vice-Cbancellor, in 1823, on similar principles, dissolved an injunction which had been obtained ex parte against the publication of a pirated edition of a portion of "Don Juan." It may well be doubted whether the above decisions would be deemed guides in the present day. The Act, 8 Anne, c. 19, was the first statutory dealing with copy- right after publication. As the name implies, the right commences from the moment the eye of the public is allowed to rest upon the subject. This Act, however, only dealt with literary work, and copyright after publication in literary works is now regulated by an Act 5 & 6 Vict. c. 45 (commonly called Talfourd's Act), by which former Acts are repealed, and thenceforth " the copyright in every book which shall be published in the lifetime of the author shall endure for the natural life of such author, and for the further term of seven years, commencing at the time of his death ; and shall be the property of such author and his assigns : Provided that if the said term of seven years shall expire before the end of forty-two years from the first publication of such book, the copyright shall, in that case, endure for such period of forty-two vears : and that the copyright in every book which shall be published after the death of its author shall endure for the term of forty-two years from the first publication thereof, and shall be the property of the proprietor of the author's manuscript, from which such book shall be first published, and his assigns." And further : " The copyright which at the time of the passing of this Act shall subsist in any book theretofore published, shall be extended for the full term provided by the Act in cases of books thereafter published, and shall be the property of the person who, at the time of the passing of the Act, shall be the proprietor of such copyright : Provided that, in all cases where such copyright shall belong in whole or in part to a publisher or other person who shall have acquired it for other consideration than that of natural love and aff'ection, such copyright shall not be extended by the Act, but shall endure for the term which shall subsist therein at the time of the passing of the Act, and no longer, unless the author if he be living, or his personal representative, if he be dead, and the proprietor of such copyright shall, before the expiration of such term, consent and agree to accept the benefits of the Act in respect of such book, in which case such copyright shall endure for the full term by the Act provided in cases of books to be published after the passing of the Act." This Act passed on 1st July, 1842, and a previous Act, 5 & 6 AVm. IV., 0. 65, entitled an " Act for preventing the publication of lectures without consent," enacts that from the date of that Act LAW OF COPYRIGHT. 57 (Sept. 1, 1S35) the author of any lecture, or the person to -whom he has sold or otherwise conveyed the copy, in order to deliver the same in any school, seminary, institution, or other place, or for any other purpose, should have the sole right of printing and publishing such lecture. A penalty is attached to a violation, and the Act declares that if any person shall, by taking down a lecture in shorthand, or otherwise in writing, or in any other way obtain a copy, and shall print or lithograph, or otherwise copy and publish it without the leave of the author, or his assignee, and every person, who knowing the same to have been printed, &c., without such con- sent, shall sell, publish, or expose to sale any such lecture, shall forfeit such print or copy, together with one penny for every sheet thereof found in his custody, either printed, lithograpb.ed, or copied, or printing, lithographing, or copying, or published or exposed to sale contrary to the Act, one moiety to the Crown, and the other to the prosecutor ; and that any printer or publisher of any newspaper who shall, without such consent, print and publish in such newspaper any lecture or lectvires, should be deemed a person printing and publishing without leave, within the provisions of the x\ct, and liable to tlie aforesaid penalty and forfeiture in respect of such printing and publishing. Lectures delivered in any university, or public school, or college, or on any public foundation, or by any individual in virtue of or according to any gift, endowment, or foundation, are excluded from the protection of the Act 5 & 6 Wm. IV., c. 65. Also lectures of the delivery of which notice in writing shall not have been given two days previously to two justices living within five miles of the place of delivery ; sec. 4. The case of Abernethy v. Hutchinson, before referred to, occurred before the passing of this Act ; and though decided upon the ground of breach of trust only, the point involved is expressly provided for under the third section of that Act, thus : " No person allowed, for certain fee and reward, or otherwise, to attend and be present at any lecture delivered in any place, shall be deemed and taken to be licensed or have leave to print, copy, and publish such lectures only because of having leave to attend such lecture or lectures." Mr. Abernetliy's lectures were delivered at St. Bartholomew's Hospital, and it might at first sight, therefore, appear that they would not enjoy the protection of the Act, but would probably come within the exception excluded from such protection by the 5th section, as having been delivered in a " public school " of medicine or surgery, " or on a public foundation," or " by an individual iu virtue of or according to some gift, endowment, or foundation," but this would, of course, depend upon the definition of the words 58 LAW OF COPYRIGHT. " public school," &c., and whether the lecturer at an institution supported purely by voluntary contributions (though, doubtless, St. Bartholomew's Hospital is otherwise endowed), can be said to deliver his lectures " in virtue of any gift, endowment, or founda- tion." As the section concludes by declaring " that the law relating thereto shall remain the same as if this Act had not been passed," it would at all events seem that in such a case the lectures would be protected where, as was there alleged, " no persons had a right to attend the lectures except those who were admitted to that privilege by the lecturer ; that it had always been understood by him, and by those who preceded him in the office, and those who attended the lectures, that the persons who so attended did not acquire, and were not to acquire, any right of publishing the lectures which they heard ; but that the plaintiif and his predecessors respectively had and retained the sole and exclusive right of printing and pub- lishing their respective lectures, for his and their own respective benefit ; that there was an implied contract between the plaintitF and those who attended his lectures, that none of them should publish his lectures, or any part thereof; that the defendants had been furnished with a copy of the lectures, which they had printed, through the medium of some person who had attended the lectures under Mr. Abernethy's above-mentioned permission : and that it was a breach of contract or trust in such person so to furnish the copy, and in the defendant to print and publish the same." Upon these allegations, the Lord Chancellor said " The point to be determined was whether there was such a violation of the contract as to sustain an action ; if not whether an injunction could be asked for He had no doubt whatever an action would lie against a pupil who published these lectures. One question had been, whether Mr, Abernethy, from the peculiar situation which he filled in the hospital, was precluded from publishing his own lec- tures for his profit ; but there was no evidence before the Court that he had not such right. Therefore the defendants must be en- joined in future." (Extract from Lord Eldon's judgment in the case.) A lecturer now, even without proof of an implied contract be- tween himself and the audience, has a property in his lectures, though orally delivered, and is entitled to the benefit of the protec- tion afforded by the 3rd section of the Act, provided at least he cannot be brought within the 4th section, as before mentioned. It is frequently difficult to decide what amounts to an infringe- ment of copyright — whether in fiict the use made of a work is fair and reasonable, or is only colourably and evasively different from it. Sir E. Kindersley has defined unfair use of an original work to be the extraction of its vital part. Murray v. Bogue, 1 Drew 369, and Mr. Justice Maule^ in Sweet v. Beuning, 16 Common Bench 485, LAW OF COPYRIGHT. 59 said — it was " not so much of kind as of degree." In Bohn v. Bogue, 10 Jurist 420, Sir L. Shadwell, V.C.E , remarked: " In cases of this nature, if the pirated matter is not considerable, that is, where passages which are neither numerous nor long have been taken from different parts of the original work, this Court will not interfere to restrain the publication of the work complained of, but will leave the plaintiff to seek his remedy at law." The dicta of the yice-Chancellor in the case last mentioned, must not, however, be relied on as an argument that piracy is to be judged solely by the quantity taken from the copyright work. Lord Cottenham has said, in reply to an argument of that description, " When it comes to a question of quantity it must be very vague ; one writer may take all the vital part of another's book, though it might be a small proportion of the book in quantity : it is not only quantity but value that is always looked to. It is useless to refer to any particular case as to quantity." Bramwell v. Halcomb, 3 M. and Cr. 73S, and see Sir W. P. Wood, V.C. in Tinsley v. Lacy, 111 AV.E. 877. Licher's observation is very pertinent to this point. " The thief only takes the wheat, not the straw, wliich is the bulk of the crop." And said Mr. Justice Story, in Gray v. Eussell, 1 Story E. 11, "Extracts non numerautur sed ponderantur. The quintessence of a work may be piratically extracted so as to leave a mere caput mortuum, by a selection of all the important passages in a comparatively moderate space." But this is matter rather for the lawyer than the medical practitioner, or even the medical author, and as " sufScient for the day is the evil thereof," proceedings against another for infringement of a copyright would so inevitably involve the retention of the services of a legal adviser on the occasion, that any mere general information that this treatise might supply would furnish but little practical assistance. It only remains, therefore, to observe that the first International Copy- right Act was 1 and 2 Vict. c. 59. It embraced books only, and was repealed by 7 and 8 Vict. c. 12, and this Act was followed by a convention between this country and France. The convention was concluded at Paris, November 3rd, 1851, for an extension to each country of a reciprocal copyright in works of literature and art. The convention was followed by an Order in Council of January 10, 1852, to the following effect. " From and after the 17th of January, 1852, the authors of works of literature or of art, in which the laws of Great Britain give to British subjects the privilege of copyright, and the executors, administrators, and assigns of such authors, Szc, shall as respects works pub- lished within the dominions of France after the above date of the Order, have tlie privilege of copyright therein for a period equal to the term of copyright which authors, &c., of the like works respec- 60 LAW OF COPYRIGHT. tively first published in the Uuited Kingdom are by law entitled to, provided such books, &c., have been registered, and copies thereof have been delivered according to the requirements of the said recited Act (7 & 8 Vict. c. 12) within three months after the first publication thereof in any part of the French dominions, or, if such, work be published in parts, then within three months after the publication of the last part thereof. It seems that a newspaper is not a work published in parts within the meaning of the provision, because it could not have been intended that at any period, however remote, the publisher of such a work might register it and carry back his copyright therein to the earliest period in 1852, when French authors had a copyright in this country. Sir "W. P. Wood (V.C.) in Cassell v. Stilf, 2 Ka. & Jo. 279. In order to enable her Majesty to make similar stipulations in any treaty with any other foreign powers. Parliament passed another Act (15 & 16 Vict., c. 12) the first 9 sections of which are incorporated with the 7 & 8 Vict., 0. 12, and sec. 18 of the earlier Act is repealed by the latter so far as the same is inconsistent therewith. Under that Act the Queen in Council may now direct that the authors of books published after a specified day in any foreign country, their executors, &c., may (subject to the provisions of the 15 & 16 Vict., c. 12) prevent the publication in the British dominions of any translations of such books not authorized by them for a period (to be specified by her Majesty) not exceeding five years from the first publication of an authorized translation, and in the case of books published in parts for a period not exceeding, as to each part, five years from the first pub- lication of an authorized translation of that part, 15 & 16 Vict., c. 12, sec. 2. The laws which protect British copyright are, by the same Act, conditionally extended to such authorized translations. But no author, his executors, &c., can have the benefit of the Act in respect of any translation of a book, &c., unless within three months of its first publication he register and deposit a copy in the manner required for original works by 7 & 8 Vict., c. 12, and unless the author notifies in the titlepage (if any) or on some con- spicuous part of the book, that it is his intention to reserve the rights of translating it, and unless the authorized translation, or a part thereof, is published either in the foreign country (named in the order by which the translation is protected) or in the British dominions, within one year, and wholly published within three years after the registry and deposit of the original work under the Act ; and unless the translation itself be registered and a copy of it deposited within a period (to be named in the order) relating to such translation, and in the manner prescribed by 7 & 8 Vict., c. 12, for the registry and deposit of original works. The above requisi- tions apply to articles originally published in newspapers or perio- LAW OF COPYRIGHT. 61 dicals, if the same be afterwards published iu a separate form, but they do not apply to such articles as originally published. (Sec. 8.) To give effect to these stipulations, the Act 15 & IG Vict., c. 12, expressly declared that during the continuance of the convention the provisions of the Act should apply to it, and to transla- tions of books, &c., which should, after the passing of the Act, be published in France, in tlie same manner as if an Order in Council had been issued for giving effect to the convention, and had therein directed that such translations should be protected for five years from the first publication, and as if a period of three months from the publication of such translation was specified in the order as the period for registering and depositing a copy of the translation (S. 11). And further, any article of political discussion which has been published in any newspaper or periodical in a foreign couatry, may, if the source from which the same is taken be acknowledged, be republished, or translated in any newspaper or periodical in this country. Any article relating to any other subject may, if its source be acknowledged, be also reprinted or translated, in like manner, unless the author has signified his intention of reserving the copyright therein and the right of translating the same in some conspicuous part of the newspaper or periodical in which the same was first published, in which case the same will, without the formalities required by sectiou 8 of the 15 & IG Yict., c. 12, receive the same protection as is by virtue of 7 & 8 Vict. c. 12, and 15 & 16 Vict., c. 12, extended to books (S. 7.) On a motion to restrain the infringement of an alleged copyright in a French newspaper. Sir AV. P. AVood (V.C.) intimated grave doubts whether the protection just alluded to did not mean the same protection which the author of any book would obtain under an Order in Council made pursuant to the International Copyright Acts. He therefore refused to assist the plaintiff because the requisitions of the Order in Council governing inter- national copyright in French newspapers as to registry had not been complied with. He directed the motion to stand over, with liberty to the plaintiff to bring an action, and liberty to all parties to apply. (Cassell v. Stiff, supra.) The Act 15 & IG Vict., c. 12, prohibits the importation into any part of the British domiuions without the consent of the registered proprietor or his agent authorized in writing, of any copies of any works of literature or art iu whicli there is copyright under the Inter- natioual Copyright Acts, and which have been printed or made in any foreign country except that country in which such work shall have been first published ; also all unauthorized translations of it. and extends to such copies and translations sections 17 & 23 of the 5 & G Vict., c. 45. 62 LAW OF COPYRIGHT. The French law of copyright, taken in connexion with the French convention, seems to admit the work of any alien holding a French copyriglit to the benefit of the convention. (See 1 Jurist, N.S. pt. 2, p. 523.) International copyright has since been arranged with Prussia, Saxony, Brunswick, Thuringia, Hanover, Oldenburgh, Anhalt, Ham- burgh, Belgium, Spain, Sardinia, and Hesse. In the case of Aveneys V. Mudie, the Court of Exchequer has decided that the proprietor of a foreign print, who claims a copyright therein under the Inter- national Copyright Acts, must, in reference to such print, comply with the provisions of our own engraving Acts (10 Exch. Eep.203). By 25 & 26 Yict., c. 91, sec. 2, the copyright in the Pharmacopoeia is vested in the " General Council of Medical Education and Regis- tration of the United Kingdom." 63 CHAPTEE YII. SCHOOLS OF ANATOMY. The Act for regulating schools of anatomy ia that of 2 & 3 "Wm. IV., c. 75. By this Act, tlie Secretary of State for the Home Depart- ment in Great Britain, or the Chief Secretary in Ireland, is em- powered to grant a license ^to practise anatomy to any fellow or member of any College of Physicians, or Surgeons, or to any graduate or licentiate in medicine, or any person lawfully qualified to practise medicine in any part of the United Kingdom, or to any professor or teacher of anatomy, medicine, or surgery, or to any student attending any school of anatomy, on application from such party for such purpose, countersigned by two of his Majesty's justices of the peace, acting for the county, city, borough, or place, wherein such party resides, certifying that to their knowledge or belief such party so applying is about to carry on the practice of anatomy. Under this Act, inspectors of places where anatomy is carried ou are appointed, every such inspector to make a quarterly return of every deceased person's body that during the preceding quarter has been removed for anatomical examination to every separate place in his district where anatomy is carried on, distinguishing the sex, and, as far as is known, the name and age of such persons. Such inspectors to visit and inspect, at any time, any place in their separate dis- tricts, notice of which has been given that it is intended there to practise anatomy. Any executor, or person having the lawful possession of the body of any deceased, and not being an undertaker or other person en- trusted witli the body only for the purpose of interment, may permit the body of the deceased to undergo anatomical examination unless such deceased person shall have expressed his desire (in the mode in- dicated in the Act) that his body after his death might not undergo such examination, or unless the surviving husband or wife, or any known relative, shall require the body to be interred without such examination. If the deceased himself has directed (in the manner therein indicated) that his body after death shall be examined anatomically, and such direction be made known before burial to the party in lawful possession of the body, then any person so autho- rized as beforementioned to make such examination shall be re- 64 SCHOOLS OF ANATOMY. quested, by the person in lawful possession of the dead body, to make such examination, unless an objection is made by certain relatives as before. And any person duly licensed to perform such examinations may receive or possess the body of any such person for the purpose of anatomical examination if permitted so to do by the party having lawful possession of the body, provided a certifi- cate of the illness of which the deceased died, or the cause of death, be delivered with the body, which certificate the party so receiving the body shall within twenty-four hours after the removal of the body transmit to the inspector of the district, or if there be no inspector to some medical man residing at or near the place to which the body is thus removed, and also a return of the day and hour when, and from whom the body was received, the date and place of death, the sex (and as far as is known) the Chris- tian and surname, age, and last place of abode, and shall enter such particulars and a copy of the certificate in a book to be kept by him for the purpose, and shall produce such book whenever required to do so by an inspector. And no one shall carry on or teach anatomy at any place, or receive or possess for anatomical examination, or examine anatomi- cally any deceased person's body after its removal unless such person, or the owner or occupier of such place, or some person, legally authorized to examine bodies anatomically, shall have previ- ously given to the Secretary of State notice of the place where it is intended to practise anatomy, at least one week before the first receipt or possession of a body for such purpose. Such body after undergoing anatomical examination is to be decently buried in consecrated ground, or in some public burial ground, such provision to be made by the party removing or causing the body to be removed as aforesaid, and a certificate of such interment to be transmitted to the inspector within six weeks of the reception of the body. Any person offending against the provisions of this Act is to be deemed guilty of a misdemeanour, and be liable to three months' imprisonment or a fine of 50/. The medical man who certifies to the cause of death shall not be concerned in examining the body after removal, and no such remo- val shall take place till forty-eight hours after death, nor until after 24 hours' notice to the inspector of the district, or otherwise, of the intended removal of the body. A crime hitherto unheard of gave occasion to the passing of the above Statute. Such is unmistakeably recorded in the preamble of the Act itself as follows : — " Whereas a knowledge of the causes and nature of sundry diseases which affect the body, and of the best methods of treating and curing such diseases, and of healing and repairing divers wounds and injuries to which the human frame is SCHOOLS OF ANATOMY. 65 liable, cannot be acquired without tlie aid of anatomical examination. And whereas the le(jal supply of human bodies for such anatomical examination is insufficient fully to provide the means of such know- ledge. ifVnd whereas, in order further to supply human bodies for such purposes, divers great and grievous crimes liave been committed, and lately murder, for the single object of selling for such purposes the bodies of the persons so murdered. And whereas it is highly expe- dient to give protection, under certain regulations, to the study and practice of anatomy, and to prevent, as far as may be, such great and grievous crimes and murders as aforesaid : Be it therefore enacted," &c., &c. Thus is indelibly recorded in the statute-book of England that in the nineteenth ceutury of the Christian era there were wretches prowling about and deliberately murdering their unoffending fellow-creatures for tlie sole purpose of themselves living like ghouls upon the dead bodies of their victims. Burke and Hare •were the names of the principal offenders, who, having met with the fate they so richly deserved, were the diabolical cause which resulted in the present legal provision for the due supply of the anatomical demand. The preamble of the statute more than hints at " divers " other "great and grievous crimes" which "had been committed" in order to meet the increased demand for subjects, and possibly the crime of disinterring and carrying away dead bodies for the purpose of dissection is here alluded to; for though, of course, such a crime bears no comparison in atrocity with that of Burke and Hare, yet a violation of the sanctity of the grave has ever been considered, by all nations and creeds alike, to be a gross outrage upon public decency, and a cruel insult to the feelings of disconsolate relatives and friends. The first charge on record relating to digging up graves was preferred against one Haynes, in the time of James 1., but he was charged only with stealing the winding-sheets, he having returned the bodies to the sepulchre after divesting them of these habiliments. In East's " Pleas of the Crown," vol. ii. p. 652, we find a note of this case among others. It is there stated, " There can be no pro- perty in a dead corpse, and therefore stealing it is no felony, but a very high misdemeanour." In the case of Doctor Ilandyside, where trover was brought against him for two children that grew together, Lord Chief Justice AVilles held the action would not lie, as no person had any property in corpses. But a shroud stolen from the corpse must be laid lo be the property of the executors, or whoever else buried the deceased, and not of the deceased himself. Sir Edward Coke, who, as he states, advised upon the case of Haynes, " for the rareness of tlie F 66 SCHOOLS OF ANATOMY. case, consulted with the judges at Serjeants' Inn, inPleet-street; where we all resolved, that the property of the sheets was in the executors, administrators, or other owner of them, for the dead body is not capable of any property, and the property of the sheets must be in somebody : and according to this resolution he was indicted for felony at the next assizes, but the jury found it but petty larceny, for which he was whipped, as he well deserved." (Coke's Inst. P.C. p. 110) His words in the marginal note of this case are fur turn iimuditum. In 1788, one Lynn was convicted on an indictment charging him with entering a certain burying ground, and taking a coffin out of the earth, from which he took a dead body, and carried it away for the purpose of dissecting it. The only Act having any relation to such a crime was that of 1 Jac. I., c. 72, which prior to this time had been repealed by 9 Geo. II., c. 5, making it felony to take up a dead body out of any place where it rested, for the purpose of using it in any manner of witchcraft, sorcery, charm, or enchant- ment ; but here the charge was, " for the purpose of using it for dissection." The Court, however, said that "common decency required that the practice should be put a stop to. That the oftence was cognizable in a criminal court, as being highly indecent, and contra honos mores, at the bare idea alone of which nature revolted. That the purpose of taking up the body for dissection did not make it less an indictable offence." It will be observed that it was the disinterring, and not the dissecting, that constituted the offence ; and the statute with which this chapter is prefaced provides, therefore, for the decent interment of the body after the anatomical examination, and allows of no further disturbance of the remains. Since then, several persons have been punished for dis- interring bodies, under the name of resurrectionists, and there is also a case (a.d. 1822), of Eex v. Cundick, 1 Dowliug and Eyland, M. C. p. 356, establishing that to sell the dead body of a felon capitally executed, for the purpose of dissection, where dissection formed no part of the sentence, is a misdemeanour indictable at common law. At length it seems to have occurred to the reprobates before mentioned that it was a readier process, and one attended with less risk of detection, to apply a pitch plaister to a living man's mouth and nostrils than to raise a corpse from what ought to be its last resting-place. It may be observed, in conclusion, that the re- ception of a dead body otherwise than through the medium of supply pointed out by the statute, with any indicia of violence upon it, so as to raise a reasonable suspicion of foul play, might place the recipient in a most painfully perilous position in that respect, besides rendering him liable to be punished by fine SCHOOLS OF ANATOMY. 67 or imprisonment under the 18th section of the 2 & 3 AVm. IV., c. 75. The clergyman of tlie parish, or the directors of a Cemetery Company, or those wlio possess a vested freehold interest, and whose burying grounds or graves have been violated by any attempt at disinterring, might bring their respective actions of trespass in any such cases, but under existing circumstances such acts of trespass for the future will be perhaps entirely un- known. F 2 68 CHAPTER VIII. LAW OF PAETNEESHIP AS AFFECTING THE MEDICAL PEOFESSTOIT. Perhaps the most accurate definition of the term " partnership " is that given by Mr. Dixon in his work on the " Law of Partnership — I." He there defines a partnership to be "a voluntary and unincorpo- rated association of individuals standing to one another in the relation of principals for carrying out a joint operation or under- taking for the purpose of a joint profit." Such then may be said to be a partnership in the proper sense of the term. The usual characteristics of a partnership are a community of interest in profits and losses, a community of interest in the capital employed, and a community of power in the management of the business engaged in. An agreement, therefore, to share, though not necessarily in equal parts, profits and losses, may be said to be the type of a partnership contract. It admits of no doubt whatever that an agreement to share the profits and losses arising from trade, busi- ness, or adventure, constitutes partnership in that undertaking, even although the words partners or partnership do not occur in the agreement. (Greenham v. Gray, 4 Ir. Com. L. Eep. 501.) And even an agreement to share profits, nothing being said about losses, amounts prima facie to an agreement to share losses also, (lb. p. 501 ; Dry v. Boswell, 1 Camp. 330 ; Keyse v. Barge, 9 C. B. 440,) for it is but reasonable that the chance of gain and loss should be taken by the same persons ; and unless, therefore, an inten- tion to the contrary can be shown, persons engaged in any business or adventure, and sharing the profits derived from it, are partners accordingly. Indeed, whether persons are partners is a question of intention, to be determined by a consideration of the whole agree- ment into which they have entered. This principle is illustrated by those cases in which managers or clerks are paid salaries proportionate to the business in which they are employed. In the case of Eaw- linson v. Clarke, 15 M. & "W. 292, Clarke was a surgeon, and agreed to sell his practice and drugs and stock in business to Eawlinson, who was to pay for them partly in cash down, and partly in cash at the end of a year. During this year Clarke agreed to carry on his practice as usual, and to introduce Eawlinson to the patients ; and LAW OF PARTNERSniP. 69 EawHnson agreed to allow Clarke during this year one-half of the clear profits of the concern, to be paid at the expiration of the year. It was held that the \vhole agreement showed that Clarke was only to receive a salary for the service rendered to Rawlinson in helping him to continue the business. Formerly it frequently became a question in a criminal proceeding for embezzlement whether the accused were a partner or merely a clerk, servant, or assistant, as, in case he were a partner in the concern defrauded, he could not be convicted of embezzlement. In the case of E. v. Macdonald, the accused, who was paid by a per-centage of profits, having been con- victed of embezzlement, was held by the Court of Criminal Appeal to have been rightly convicted, as there was no partnership ; and now by 81 & 32 Vict. c. 116, s, 1, it is enacted that " If any person being a member of any co-partnership, or being one of two or more owners of any money, goods or effects, bills, notes, securities, or other property, shall steal or embezzle such property of or belonging to any such co-partnership, or to such joint beneficial owners, every such person shall be liable to be dealt with, tried, convicted, and punished for the same, as if such person had not been or was not a member of such co-partnership, or one of such beneficial owners ;" and the case above quoted is therefore now only referred to, together with that of Harrington v. Churchward, 6 Jurist, N. S. 576, as showing that remuneration arising out of a per-centage of profits does not necessarily constitute a partnership, at least as between the person so paid for his services and his masters. In the latter case, the Vice-Chancellor Wood, now Lord Chancellor, held tliat the contract into which the parties had entered was a contract of hiring and service only. In the above cases, had there been, as there was not, capital or stock common to those who shared the profits, that additional circumstance would have gone far to show that a partner- ship was in fact intended. (See Eeid v. Holinshead, 4 B. & C. 867 ; i:x parte Chuck, 8 Bing. 469 ; Gilpin v. Enderby, o B. &. A. 954.) At the same time it is not essential to the existence of a partner- ship that there should be any joint stock or capital. If several persons labour together for the sake of gain, and of dividing that gain, they will not be partners the less on account of having no common stock, or plant. Thus in Fremont v. Conpland, 2 Bing. 170, also Lovegrove v. Nelson, 3 M. & K. 1, two persons who horsed a coach and divided the profits were held to be partners, although each found his own horses, and the other had no property in them. The ordinary agreement between publishers and authors, to the effect that the author shall contribute the manuscript, and the publisher shall, in the first instance, defray the expenses of publi- cation, and repay himself out of the proceeds of the sale of the 70 LAW OF PARTNERSHIP. work, and that tlieu the profits sliall be divided, furnishes an in- stance of a partnership confined to profits only (Gardiner v. Chiids, 8 C. & P. 345), although in a recent case, Venables v. Wood, 3 Eoss, L. C. on Com. Law, 529, it has been held that authors and publishers are not partners at all ; but even if this is the correct doctrine, there are numerous authorities in support of the position that there may be a partnership confined to profits only. (Eeede V. Bentley, 3 K. & J. 271, and 4 ib. 656 ; AVilson v. Whitehead, 10 M. & W. 503 ; Gale v. Leckie, 2 Starkie, 107.) Again, it frequently happens that one person has property, and another skill, and the agreement is that the profits alone shall be divided. Such cases are not likely to arise among medical men, although there possibly might be cases of a partnership existing where one partner possessed all the capital, stock, drugs, &c., and the other might simply prescribe in cases of some specialty, to which he devoted himself entirely, and yet he might share in the profits of the whole business. There is nothing in the principles governiug partnerships to prevent one or more partners from agree- ing to indemnify the others against loss, or to prevent full effect being given to a contract of partnership containing such a clause of indemnity. (Bond v. Pittard, 3 M. & W. 357 ; Geddes v. Wallace, 2 Bligh, 270.) Such agreements are, however, necessarily of a complex character, and frequently lead to much litigation, because if the indemnity were construed to extend to the loss of the very advances themselves, and not merely to the losses beyond the advances, the contract would lose its character as a contract of partnership, and become a mere contract of loan. It is not unusual for a person who contemplates joining another in business, to agree that such business shall be carried on upon certain terms, not themselves creating a partnership, and to stipu- late for an option to become a partner, either at a specified time, or at any time the person having the option may choose. Such agreements, if hondjide, and not mere colourable schemes for creat- ing a partnership, and at the same time concealing it (Courtenay v. Wagstaff, 16 C. B., N. S. 110), do not create a partnership till such time as the person having the option has exercised it, and elected to become a partner. Such cases may occur as between a master and pupil, or between a principal and assistant. And this is the more important in the medical profession, because, notwithstanding the medical acts, it has been decided that although, under the Act of 1858, s. 32, no person shall be entitled to recover any charge in any court of law for any medical or surgi- cal advice, attendance, or for the performance of any operation, or for any medicine which he shall have both prescribed and supplied, unless he shall prove upon the trial that he is registered under the LAW OF PARTNERSHIP. 71 Act, it has been iutimated by high authority that if only one member of a firm is duly registered, the requisitions of the statute are complied with. (Turner v. Eaynall, ll- C. B., N. S. 328, per Chief Justice Erie.) " Even if Smith (Turner's partner iu the case) had not been registered at all, I should not," said his lordship, " as at present advised, have felt disposed to yield to the argument urged on the part of the defendant How can it matter to the patient whether the attendance is given and the medicine dispensed by an assistant, under the supervision of his master, or by one who calls himself a partner and takes a share of the profits?" At all events, as registration at the time of trial has been held sufficient to maiutain an aetiou (lb.), it follows that a pupil not yet qualified might be in partnership with a duly registered practitioner, aud upon being subsequently qualified and registered the day before trial, tlie firm might recover in the action. And, indeed, the firm in such case might recover all claims extending over a period of six years before action brought, under similar circumstances. Of course such an unqualified partner would be liable to be sued for penalties, and might be summarily convicted under the 40th section of the Act, if he had wilfully and falsely pretended to be a medical practitioner recognised by law ; but no disability of a fiscal or penal nature would interfere with the practice of a qualified, though not registered practitioner, and under the cloak of a partnership he could, at least if registered before trial, recover his charges in the name of the firm : and, if Cluef Justice Erie's intimation be ac- cepted by the Courts, it would seem that an unqualified — not merely unregistered — and a qualified practitioner might carry on a partner- ship practice, and so long as the latter was registered, the firm could recover their charges. The penal clause of the Act may be supposed sufiicient to defeat such nefarious practices, but artifices of evasion are not unusually conceived in a spirit of much in- genuity ; for instance, in the case of Pedgrift v. Barriugton Cheva- lier, 8 C. B., (N. S.) p. 246, which was an appeal from a conviction of the Halesworth (Suffolk) Petty Sessions, held on October 26th, 1859, under the penal clause of the statute. Among other things it w%as proved that on the door of a house in which the appellant and one Mr. Irwin, a registered surgeon, lived, and for which tliey were jointly assessed to the rates, was a plate in a wooden frame, on which was engraved — " Me. PEDQRirT, Mk. IllAVIN, Surgeon, Accoucheur, t^'c." It appeared that the name of Mr. Pedgrift was on a separate piece of plate from the rest ; but thex-e was no division between the 72 LAW OF PARTNERSHIP. names except the line, which was necessarily apparent where the two pieces of plate joined. It also appeared that " surgery " was written on another door, and " Surgeon Accoucheur" on the lamp over the door. The justices considered that the words "Surgeon, Accoucheur, &c.," on the plate, were meant especially to apply to Mr. Pedgrift and Mr. Irwin. Such were the main facts of the ease. Indeed, coupled with the fact that the appellant's name was not found in the copy of the " Medical Register " produced, this was the evidence relied upon by the justices in convicting ; but Chief Justice Erie said, " This case raises a question upon a statute of very grave public importance. A conviction has been brought before us upon an extremely scanty state of facts ; . . . . there is nothing upon the face of the ease to show that the appellant was not a surgeon in practice before the passing of the Act — nothing to show that he had not a diploma or other qualification, or that he was not recognised by law as a surgeon in a sense that he had a right by law to pi'actice as such, and might have enforced payment of fees by action. There is nothing, in fact, to negative his having been a duly qualified surgeon before the passing of the Act. I feel bound, under these circumstances, to say that the conviction must be quashed." By several statutes it is unlawful for any person not duly quali- fied to act by himself or anotlier as an attorney or solicitor, or to sufter his name to be made use of upon the account, or for the profit of an unqualified person. An agreement for a partnership between a person duly qualified as an attorney or solicitor and one who is not, is clearly illegal. (Williams v. Jones, 3 B. and C. 108 ; Scott v. Miller, Johns. 220.) The statutes on this subject are very stringent. An offending attorney is liable to be struck off the roll, and for ever after disabled from practising, and the unqualified person to be im- prisoned for one year. Nor can the statutes be evaded by any agree- ment to the effect that the unqualified person shall receive a share of the profits as a salary, and that he shall not be a partner with the other. (Tench v. Roberts, 6 Madd. 145 ; Be Jackson, 1 B. & C. 270; Jie Clark, 3 D. & R. 260; and Hopkinson v. Smith, 1 Bing. 13.) Neither can an attorney's clerk (unless himself qualified) act as an attorney, under cover of his principal's name (lb. and i?e Palmer, 2 A. & E. 686.) The mere fact of not taking out a certifi- cate is not deemed a disqualification within the meaning of the Act ; it simply, like want of registration under the Medical Act, operates as a barrier to the recovery of fees, or costs, and would make many acts void, as well as render the uncertificated person ineligible for sundry appointments. It is also illegal for two per- sons, one qualified and the other unqualified, to hold themselves out aa partners, and to put both their names to bills of costs and other LAW OF PARTNERSHIP. 73 documents in which their names ought not to appear, unless thoy are qualified solicitors. (Edmondson v. Davis, 4 Espinasse, 14.) Upon the whole, the restrictions and discipline for regulating the legal profession are more stringent and severe than those which apply to the medical ; but perhaps a further experience of the working of the present Medical Acts may suggest improvements, not to say remedy imperfections. Whilst upon the subject of partnership, it may not be out of place to refer to the relative rights possessed by prin- cipals and assistants. And here it may be mentioned that as every partner may in general be regarded as the agent of the firm, and as such is endowed with authority to do all acts within the scope of the partnership business so as to bind the firm, each partner would, generally speaking, have authority to hire or discharge such ser- vants, cierhs, or assistants as might be necessary for the purpose of carrying on the business of the partnership. No general rule can be laid down as to what class of servants are entitled to more than the month's warning to which domestic servants are limited. But the Court of Exchequer has held in Todd v. Kerrick, 8 Exch. Eep. 15], that a governess at GOl. a year and board and lodging does not fall within the rule by which a menial or domestic servant may be discharged with a month's notice or a month's wages. The position which she holds, the station she occupies in the family, and the manner in which such a person is usually treated in society, cer- tainly place her in a very diiferent situation from that which mere menial and domestic servants hold. The same may be said of a tutor. But in these and similar eases an arrangement should be made at the time of hiring as to the notice expected or required, or intended to be given. In the absence of any such special agree- ment about notice, the question of notice in the case of assistants to medical practitioners must be determined partly by the custom of the profession. Thus, evidence has been adduced of a usage of trade enabling a master to dismiss a commercial traveller, at 150/. a year, upon giving him three months' notice. (Metzner v. Bolton, 9^xch. 518.) On the other hand, evidence has been received of a 'custom in the woollen trade to dismiss an agent at one month's notice. (Parker v. Ibbctson, 27 L. J., C. P. 236.) And in Mortimer V. Prowett, Q. B., IST. P., June 18, 1850, evidence was given to^ show that, where no condition was expressed in the agreement of hiring, it was usual to give a printer one month's or at least a fort- night's notice, a publisher three months, and a sub-editor to the end of the current year. It has sometimes been contended, from analogy to the rule ^yhich prevents a yearly tenancy from being determined before that time of the year corresponding with the period when it commenced, that particular yearly hiriugs can only be determined in a similar manner. 74 LAW OF PARTNERSHIP. But this point will iu most cases depend upon the particular custom of the trade or business in question. There is, of course, a great distinction between a contract of apprenticeship and a contract of service. " A person has a right to dismiss a servant for misconduct, but has no right to turn away an apprentice because he misbehaves" (per Lord Denmaa, iu Wise v. ■\Vilson, 1 Carr & Kirw. 662). And yet, as in this case, there may be a mixed compact, " something between apprenticeship and ser- vice. This plaintiff's son goes to the defendant (a surgeon) to render him assistance in his business, although he is also to pursue his studies ; and, as a justification for his dismissal, the defendant has pleaded, not that the plaintiff's son did not perform all things on his part to be performed, but that he did things injurious to the defendant's practice, and so misconducted himself as to be dangerous to the defendant's practice as a surgeon. It is proved beyond aU doubt, that on some occasions tlie phxintiff's son came to the defen- dant's house intoxicated; but I think," said Lord Denman, "that that alone would not justify the defendant in dismissing him. It is also proved that on several occasions, in consequence of the plaintiff's son coming home late, he could not compound the medi- cines, and employed the shop-boy to do it. Now, I think this aftords matter for serious consideration, and if you (the jury) think that, from tills conduct of the plaintiff's son, real danger was occasioned to his master^s husiness, you ought to find your verdict for the defendant, as the defendant was then, in my opinion, justified in dismissing himy It should, however, be mentioned that in this case, although a premium had been paid, the written agreement was not an indenture of apprenticeship, strictly speaking. Arrangements are sometimes made between masters and clerks, travellers, agents, and possibly assistants, of various kinds, under which such persons, iu lieu of receiving a fixed salary, are remune- rated by a portion of the sums received by them on account of their masters, or by a per-centage on their earnings, or by a sum calcu- lated with reference to the gross or net profits (as the case may be) of the principal, or in some similar manner. These various modes of payment, which are generally adopted with a view to secure in- creased exertion, often give rise to a question of considerable im- portance — viz., how far the persons whose services are so remune- rated are to be regarded as partners, and not mere servants, agents, or assistants. "VVhcre the question arises hetween the parties them- selves, the mere fact that the servant was remunerated by a portion of the profits will not alone constitute hira a partner (Peacock v. Peacock, 2 Camp. 45), if it appears from the whole scope of the agreement that the intention of the parties was otherwise. Again, quoad third persons, there might be a partnership, but yet as inter LAW OF PARTNERSHIP. 75 se, even a division of profits might amount to nothing more than a compensation for trouble. (Hesketh v. Blauchard, 4 East, 144.) However, in the following case, before referred to, the parties were held not to be partners in any sense : — C. sold to R., and conveyed to him by deed, his interest in the profession and practice of a sur- geon, Sic, for 900Z.— 500Z. to be paid on the execution of the deed, and 400Z. at the end of tlie year. C. covenanted not to practise within three miles of the original place of business, and also that during one year from the date of the deed he would reside there, and carry on the business as before, and introduce R. to the patients, and promote the interest of the concern. In consideration thei-eof E. covenanted to allow C, during the year, a moiety of the clear profits of the concern, to be paid at the expiration of the year, lu an action of covenant brought by C. upon the deed, R. claimed to set off certain sums received by C. during the year from patients, as money received to his use. Chief Baron Pollock refused to re- ceive evidence of the receipt by C. of such sums, on the ground that the parties were partners during the first year. The Exchequer Cliamber, however, reversed this decision, considering that the par- ties were not partners. It has been held that a master was justified in dismissing a clerk, at a yearly salary, who also, at certain periods, received a portion of the profits (but this, the master alleged, was mere gratuity) for claiming to be a partner, as he thereby disclaimed being a servant. (Amor v. Fearon, 9 A. & E. 548.) Although the question of whether or not a servant was rightly discharged must of course often depend upon the nature of the services for which he was engaged, and the terms of the engagement itself, it is conceived that, whatever be the nature of the engage- ment, the following acts of either insubordination or impropriety of conduct would justify his discharge notwithstanding : — I. Wilful disobedience of any lawful order of his master. II. Gross moral misconduct, whether pecuniary or other- wise. III. Habitual negligence in business, or conduct calculated seriously to injure his master's business. IV. Incompetence, or permanent disability from illness. It is unnecessary to say that proper proof must be adduced of the cause or ground of dismissal, should such right to dismiss be dis'jfcted, as, for instance, a few days, or an occasional illness, would not create a permanent disability (Cuckson v. Stones, 28 L. J., Q. B. 25) ; neither would a day or two's protracted absence after a vacation had expired, provided the master was not compelled to hire another person, and especially if it did not appear that the assistant's absence was caused by any act of gross immorality 76 LAW OF PARTNERSHIP. (Pilleiil V. Armstrong, 7 A. & E. 557), amount to habitual negli- gence, or conduct calculated seriously to injure bis master's business. As a partnership contract is one tbat need not be created by any writing whatever, and that even persons who are not partners may nevertheless be liable to third persons as if they were, it is necessary to be careful to avoid even the appearance of a partner- ship where such does not in reality exist. A g[uasi partnership (rendering the members of it liable to third parties) may be proved by showing a holding out to the plaintiff as such ; and if in attempting to establish a quasi partnership a real partnership should be shown to exist, the liability of the persons sought to be charged will only be established the more completely. It is, therefore, always desirable to reduce to writing the terms of any agreement between principal and assistant, so that no doubt may exist as to their relative positions whether as between themselves or others — and such agreement should be properly stamped. And in an agreement for a partnership it is always better to define in writing the limits within which such co-ordinate powers are to be exercised. Besides, in some cases the agreement, in order to be valid under the Statute of Frauds, must be in icriting. The 4th section of that statute enacts " that no action shall be brought whereby to charge any person upon any agreement that is not to be performed within the space of one year from the making thereof, unless the agreement upon which such action shall be brought, or some memorandum or note thereof, shall be in writing, and signed by the party to be charged therewith, or some other person thereunto by him lawfully authorized." To illustrate the effect of this prohibition ; an agreement that a part- nership shall commence between the parties at some time distant more than a year from the making of the agreement is not binding unless some note or memorandum thereof is in writing and duly signed. (See per Justice Holroyd, in Williams v. Jones, 5 B. & C. 108.) But there is yet another prohibition contained in the former portion of the same section — viz., " that no action shall be brought whereby to charge any person upon any contract or sale of lands, tenements, or hereditaments, or any interest in or concerning them, unless such agreement or some memorandum or note thereof ^lall be in writing, and signed by the party to be charged therewit^or some other person thereunto by him lawfully authorized." Should, then, any interest in or concerning the premises where the business is carried on be contracted for, as the word " lands " includes " houses," and the word " tenements " is still more comprehensive, the agreement could not be enforced unless it or some note or LAW OF PARTNERSHIP. 77 memorandum of it were in writing and signed according to the requirements of the statute (s. 4). And furtlier, no contract for the sale of any goods for the price of 10^. sterling or upwai'ds shall be allowed to be good, except the buyer shall accept part of the goods so sold, and actually receive the same or give something in earnest to bind the bargain or in part of payment, or that some note or memorandum in writing of the said bargain be made and signed by the parties to be charged by such contract or their agents thereunto lawfully authorized (s. 17). If, therefore, in a contract for the sale of a practice any goods, such as drugs, surgery fittings, or furniture, for the price of 101. or upwards, are included, the above requirements must be strictly observed. 78 CHAPTER IX. THE LAW OF LIFE ASSURANCE AS AEFECTING THE MEDICAL PBOPESSION. It is proposed to consider in this chapter the duties of medical referees both with recjard to the person proposing the insurance and the insurance oflice with which such proposer is in treaty. Medical referees are too prone to cousider themselves as acting on belialf of the proposer, and in practice give the most favourable answers which they conscientiously can to facilitate the issue of the policy. In a recent leading case in the Exchequer Chamber, the judges on that occasion, as well as in the Court below, have definitely decided that " In cases where the representations of the referees are made the basis of the policy, the answers of the referees are binding upon the insured, so as to make the falsehood of their re- presentations an answer to an action on the policy ; but in the present case," said the Court, " considering that the parties insuring were only required to state their belief as to the matter under dis- cussion, and that the life and the referees were really acting iu fraud, both of the plaintiffs and the defendants, and that they were not at all in the capacity of persons negotiating the contract, we can see no pretence for making them the agents of the parties insuriug, so as to render their fraud that of the plaintiifs." And again — " The insurer and the insured being equally ignorant of material facts to influence their contract, if the insurer asks for informa- tion, and the insured does his best to put the insurer in a situa- tion to obtain the information, and to form his own opinion whether the information is sincere, can it be permitted that when the insurer, without any blame being attributed to the insured, baa allowed himself to be deceived, he shall be able to say to the insured, ' Tou warranted all the information I received to be true, and having received your premiums for many years, now the life drops, I tell that you I was incautious and the policy I gave you a nullity ?'" (Wheetton v. Hardisty, 3 Jurist, N. S. 1170 ; 5 Jur. N. S. 14.) In the explanation of this case it should be mentioned that the THE LAW OF LIFE ASSURANCE. 79 plaintiffs were the directors of a reversionary interest company, who, having failed to effect an insurance upon the life in question in tlie European ofBce, had insured the same life — viz., that of a tenant for life— in the office of the defendants. The plaintiffs had been no parties to the false statements of either this tenant for life, his usual medical attendant, or his private friend, upon which statements the defendants appear to have relied ; but the papers of the European office were handed to the defendant's office by the plaintiffs, and the medical officers of the defendant's office never even saw the tenant for life, but accepted the proposal in the names of the plaintifls, and in the form filled up ; in lieu of the usual statements as to health and habits, the secretary of the reversionary company wrote, " See papers received from the Euro- pean Company," and added, ""We (the plaintiffs) do hereby declare that we believe that the above particulars and statements are true." No doubt, the most perfect bona fides is to be observed in life insurances as in other contracts ; and should the referee make a li'UfuUij untrue statement, or collude with the party making the proposal, he may, although not personally interested in the contract, render himself liable to an action if loss should ensue (Pasley v. Freeman, 3 Term Eep. 51) ; for if a man will wickedly assert that which he knows to be false, and thereby draws his neighbour into a heavy loss, even though it be under the specious pretence of serving his friend, he makes himself liable for the damage, and that even if no fraud was intended by him. (Watson v. Poulson, 15 Jur. 1111 Exch.) A statement false in f\ict, but not known to be so by the party making it, or not made with intent to deceive, but, on the contrary, believed to be correct, will not render him liable in an action, although it may have induced the insurers to undertake the insurance, and they may have suffered pecuniary loss thereby, since to support an action of deceit the scienter must be proved. (Shrewsbury v. Blount, 2 M. & G. 475 ; Eawlings v. Bell, 1 C. B. 951 ; Chandelor v. Lopus, 1 Smith's Lead. Cas. 77.) How this liability might be enforced in practice, and in what cases, it would be beyond the province of this work to inquire. It is sufficient here to state the general liability in such cases, princi- pally to guard against its occurreiice. Medical referees of parties proposing insurances on their lives have of late years laid claim to a fee for their certificates, and to this there can be no objection ; but in claiming the fee of the insurance office, and not of the patient, tiiey have pushed the pro- position too far. The point has been raised in cases tried in tliree different Small Debts Courts, and has signally fiiiied. (Philbrick v. "Whetham, 4th Oct. 1850, Colchester County Court ; Hooper v. 80 THE LAW OF LIFE ASSURANCE. The Gresham Life Assurance Company, June 1851, Sborediteli County Court ; and Duplex v. The Economic Life Office, Aug. 1852, in the Sheriffs' Court, before Mr. Kussell Gurney.) As there are no authorized Reports of County Court cases to which to refer the reader, the substance of these cases will be found set out in the Appendix. As a matter of policy, it would seem to be to the companies' interest to pay the fees, since of course it is optional to the medical man to reply to the letter of application without the fee ; or if, after declining to give in- formation without payment, the company continue to request the information, they would be bound to pay for it. All insurance offices are naturally desirous to consult with the medical man who has been last in attendance on the life to be insured (Morrison v. Musprat, 4 Bingham, 60) ; and where the reference was made to a person who had been the ordinary medical adviser, but no mention was made of the person attending at the time of the insurance, the policy was vacated. (Everett v. Desborough, 5 Bing. 503 ; Hutton v. The Waterloo L. A. C, 1 E. & E. 735 ; Cazenove V. The British Equitable A. C, 6 C. B., N. S. 437.) At the same time, a reference to a person who, immediately before the time at which the policy is effected, has been casually consulted for trifling maladies, will not satisfy the requisition for a reference to the usual medical attendant, although the person who had formerly attended may have retired from practice at the time. (Huckman v. Fernie, 3 M. & W. 505.) " Who is your usual medical attendant ?" involves a question of considerable impor- tance. "Now," said Lord Abinger (Chief Baron), in the case just cited, " let it be considered for a moment what is the grammatical sense of that question. It is in the present tense. Suppose a person goes to effect a policy on his life who had no medical attendant in the last year : if the answer to the question were, ' I have no such medical attendant,' must not that question of necessity be followed by another question, which is, ' Who was your former medical attendant ?' The terms and nature of the question show that it was designed to extract from the person who is the medical attendant best able to give an account of her constitution at that time ; and if she has no medical attendant in the precise grammatical sense of the question, it appears to me that she is bound to mention who is the medical attendant who could give that information." Also, " the word ' usual,' " said the same authority, " implies having attended more than once." Again, in another case, the plaintiff, wishing to insure the life of a man named House, referred the agent of the company to him for the necessary information for filling up the declaration, and he stated, " I have never had occasion for a doctor: sometimes I have THE LAW OF LIFE ASSURANX'E. 81 taken Harvey's quack pills, but Mr. V. knows as much of me as any man." The plaintill" signed the proposal, stating that Mr. V. was the usual medical attendant. It was proved at the trial that Mr. V. had not attended House for nearly twenty years, but that he had occasionally been attended, after fits of intemperance in which he was wont to indulge, by a quack doctor named Harvey : of this the plaintifi' was unaware. The Court decided that it was no matter Avhcther Dr. Harvey was a good medical attendant or not, he was the person actually attending him : tliat the circum- stance that the plaintiff was ignorant of the error did not affect the question, but that the policy was void. Hence it seems that it is not necessary that the usual medical attendant should be a regularly qualified practitioner : it is suiScient that he acts in that capacity. And, a fortiori, a qualified medical practitioner, though not regis- tered, may be thus designated. (Everitt v. Desborough, 5 Bing. p. 503.) In order to constitute moral fraud in any one, it is not necessary that the statement should be fixlse to the actual knowledge of the party making it ; if untrue in fact, and not believed to be true by the parties making it, and made for a fraudulent purpose, it is both a legal and a moral fraud. (Taylor v. Ashton, 11 M. & W. -±15.) Although two sisters of the insured had died young, of consump- tion, the evidence of the usual medical attendant, that consumption could not be detected in the insured until some months after the proposal to the company was made, is evidence ^ro tanto to rebut any imputation of fraud in that respect ; but in reply to the question, " Have you ever been proposed to, or declined by, any other office ? If so, name it," the answer tilled in by the agent being, " I have been and am still in correspondence with other offices, as the amount to be insured is large," — the fact being that eight offices had refused, and in one instance only had a proposal been accepted — amounted to a wilful suppression of the fact that other offices had been applied to and had refused the life, and allowing another to act on a belief cf facts known to be untrue was fraud. {In re The General Provincial Life x\ssurauce Com- pany, ex 2^a7'tel>amtvee. Before Malins, X.C, January 21, 1S70.) 82 CHAPTEE X. Section I. THE PUBLIC HEALTH (COMMON AND STATUTE LAW). CONTAGIOUS AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES. I'he doing of any act by wliicli the health of the public might bs endangered, whether by the propagation of an infectious disease, or by erecting any establishment which might corrupt the air by noxious exhalations, was ever a great misdemeanour at common law. Three diseases were formerly regarded with the utmost horror — the plague, the syphilis, and the leprosy ; and the strictest precau- tious were taken to prevent the propagation of them, especially the first and the last named. It was at one time generally believed that syphilis was so conta- gious as to render the mere presence of a person suffering from it dangerous to others ; and the very ancient writ " De leproso amovendo" would appear to have been directed against syphilis quite as much as against leprosy. It is thus described in Fitzherbert's " Natura Brevium," coupled with a commentary supposed to be written by Lord Chief Justice Hale : — " AV^here a man is a lazar or a leper, and is dwelling in any town, and he will come into the church, or amongst his neighbours where they are assembled to talk with them, to their annoyance and disturbance ; then he or they may sue forth this writ to remove him from their company." " But it seemeth, if a man be a lazar or a leper, and will keep within his liouse, and will not converse with his neighbours, that then he shall not be moved out of his house. But there are divers manners of lepers ; but it seemeth that the writ is for those lepers who appear to the sight of all men that they are lepers by their voice, and their sores, and the putrefaction of their flesh, and by the smell of them. But for those who are infected with that disease in their bodies, where it doth not appear outwardly upon their bodies, qucEre, whether such writ lieth to remove them." (Fitzh., " Xatura Brevium," p. 233.) The writ speaks of " the contagion of the CONTAGIOUS AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES. 83 disease," and directs that such diseased person sliould be "seen and diligently examined by certain discreet and lawful men who have the best knowledge of such disease," and if he be found to be a leper " then without delay'' he is to " be carried aAvay, and removed from the communication of his neighbours, to a solitary place, to dwell there, as the custom is, lest by his common conversa- tion damage or peril should in any wise happen to the said men." " Lazars" are said to be included in the writ, and Dr. Johnson derives the term " lazar" from " Lazarus in the Gospel," who is not described as a leper in the common acceptation of that term — i.e., as afflicted with the " mala scabies" — but as " covered with sores ;" and open and putrefying sores seem to be the description of leprosy, or contagious disease, according to Hale, against which the writ was directed, rather than against that description of leprosy which " did not appear outwardly upon the body" in the manner before described by the learned commentator. The exposing, by carrying, a child infected with small-pox along a public way, near to dwelling-houses, &c., to the great danger of infecting persons there passing, is a great ijiisdemcanour at common law. (Rex v. A^antandillis, 4 Maule & Selwyn, p. 73.) " There can be no doubt," said INIr. Justice Le Blanc, in passing sentence, " that if a person unlawfully, injuriously, and with full knowledge of the fact, exposes in a public highway a person infected with a contagious disorder, it is a common nuisance to all the subjects, and indictable as such. No person having a disorder of this description upon him ought to be publicly exposed to the en- dangering of the health and lives of the rest of the subjects." The first statute relating to the plague is that of 2 Jac. I., c. 31, which declared that all infected persons going abroad with any infectious sore upon them, uncured, should suffer death as felons ; but if such persons had not such sore found upon them, they were to be punished as vagabonds. And similar regulations were afterwards incorporated into several acts relating to quaran- tine, the principal of which are the 9th Anne, c. 2, and 6 Geo. IV., c. 78. Although, until recently, inoculating for the small-pox was not illegal in itself, yet in an indictment charging the defendant, an apothecary, with inoculating for that disease and injuriously causing the infected person to be carried along a public street, &e., INIr. Justice Le Blanc observed that the introduction of vaccination did not render the practice of inoculation for the small-pox unlaw- ful, but that it was at all times unlawful, and an indictable oil'ence, to expose persons infected with contagious disorders, and, there- fore, liable to communicate them to the public, in a place of public resort, (E. v. Burnett, 4 Maule & Sohvyn, 271.) Modern legislation on the question of the public health might g2 8i THE PUBLIC HEALTH. be the subject of almost a work in itself. It is not proposed, therefore, in the present chapter, to do more than briefly refer to such Acts (for the most part) as more immediately relate to infec- tious and contagious diseases ; for, however the whole of this branch of legislation may be deemed within the compass of a purely medi- cal treatise, the object of the present work is, as has been before remarked, necessarily confined to those laws which directly aifect, not so much the public, qua public, but the medical practitioners, as members of a particular profession. It will not, therefore, be desirable to allude to such Acts as relate to the establishment of baths and washhouses, however beneficial they may be in a sanitary point of view ; nor yet to those which have reference to the supply of water to, and the sewerage, drain- age, cleansing, and paving of towns and populous places, however these may promote the health and comfort of their inhabitants ; nor yet to the Acts to prevent the spreading of contagious and in- fectious disorders amongst sheep, cattle, and other animals, or to prevent the adulteration of articles of food or drink, however such may check the supply of unwholesome food. Neither will such Acts as have been passed to abate nuisances arising from the smoke of furnaces or steam-vessels be deemed within the province of this work, even though such exhalations may be sometimes noxious, as well as offensive, the object being to devote the few pages allotted to this subject to a consideration of those laws whose tendency is directly to prevent diseases, and not merely indirectly to promote the greater salubrity of the population. The first Act, therefore, which calls for attention is the 23 & 24 Yict., c. 77, amending the existing Acts for the Eemoval of Nuisances and the Prevention of Diseases, and constituting certain bodies therein named the local authorities to execute the " Nuisance Ee- moval Act," and repealing all former enactments constituting a local authority for the execution of the "Diseases Prevention Act" (except those contained in the " Metropolitan Local Management Act "), and directing that the Board of Guardians, or the over- seers of the poor (as the case may be) where there is no board of guardians, shall be the local authority for executing the " Diseases Prevention Act," who are thereby directed to provide carriages for the conveyance of infected persons suffering from contagious or infectious diseases, and two justices at petty sessions, upon proper complaint, may order the removal of a nuisance on any private premises, and the guardians of any union, or parish not within an union, may at any time employ oue of their medical officers to make inquiry and report upon the sanitary state of the union or parish. And by the 29 & 30 Vict., c. 90 (styled the " Sanitary Act, 1866 "), s. 22, the nuisance authority, which shall mean any CONTAGIOUS AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES. 85 authority empowered to execute the " Nuisance Removal Act," s. 15, ujjou tlie certificate of any legally qualified medical practitioner, may direct the owner or occupier of any house, or part tliereof, to cleanse and disinfect tlie same, and in default of compliance with such order the nuisance authority shall cause such to be disinfected at the expense of the owner or occupier, or, in the case of the poverty of such persons, then the authority may, with the consent of the owner or occupier, at his own expense, cleanse and disinfect such house, &c., and any articles therein likely to retain infection. The same authority is required to provide a proper place for the dis- infection of woollen articles of clothing or bedding free of charge. An infected person entering a public conveyance without notify- ing that fact to the owner or driver will be liable to a penalty of 5Z. And, with the consent of the superintending body of a hospital within the district of a nuisance authority, any justice may, upon a certificate signed by a duly qualified medical practitioner, direct the removal to such hospital, at the cost of the nuisance authority, of any person sutfering from any dangerous, contagious, or infectious disorder, being without proper lodging or accommodation, or lodged in a room occupied by more than one family. A penalty of 5/. is imposed upon any one suftering from any dangerous infectious dis- order, who wilfully exposes himself without proper precaution in any public place or public conveyance ; and also upon any one in charge of such person so exposing the sufferer, and any owner or driver of a public conveyance who does not immediately provide for the disinfection of his conveyance after it has, with his knowledge, con- veyed any such sufferer; and any person who, without previous disinfection, gives, lends, sells, transmits, or exposes any bedding, clothing, rags, or other things which have been exposed to infection, shall be liable to a like penalty. And if any person knowingly let any house or room in which any person suffering from any dangerous infectious disorder has been, to any other person, without having first disinfected the same to the satisfaction of a qualified medical practitioner, testified by his certifi- cate, such person shall be liable to a penalty of 20/. By the 31th section of the Medical Act (185S), the words " legally qualified," or " duly qualified medical practitioner," when used in auy Act of Parliament, shall be construed to mean a person registered Under that Act. By the Sanitary Act of 1866 (29 & 30 Yict., c. 90), s. 37, the sewer authority, or in the metropolis the nuisance authority, may provide for the use of the inhabitants within its district hospitals or temporary places for the reception of the sick. And by the amended Sanitary Act (31 «& 32 Vict., c. 115), the same authorities 86 THE PUBLIC HEALTH. shall have the like power to make provision for the temporary supply of medicine and medical assistance for the poorer inhabitants as it now has to provide hospitals or temporary places for the recep- tion of the sick under the above section of the former Act. But such latter power shall not be exercised without the sanction of her Majesty's Privy Council. By the AYorkshop Eegulation Act (1867), 30 & 31 Vict., c. 146, " if npon the complaint of any officer of health, inspector of nuisances, or other officer appointed by a local authority, or of any superintendent of police, it appears to any justice of the peace that there is reasonable cause for believing that any of the provisions of the Sanitary Act, 1866, are contravened in any workshop, such justice may, by written order, empower the complainaut to enter such workshop at any time within forty-eight hours from the date of such order, and examine any person whom he finds in such work- shop touching any matter within the provisions of the Act, or of the Sanitary Act." By the 3 & 4 Wm. IV., c. 103, ss. 11 & 12, no child under the age therein specified was to be employed in any factory or mill without having personally appeared before some surgeon or physician of the place or neighbourhood of its residence, and submitted itself to his examination, nor unless he certified to having had a personal examination or inspection of such child, and that such child was of the ordinary strength and appearance of children of such age — such certificate to be within three months of its date countersigned by some inspector, or justice. Under 7 & 8 Vict., c. 15, s. 8, inspectors of fiictories were em- powered to appoint a sufiicient number of persons practising surgery or medicine to be such certifying surgeons, and in every such ap- pointment specify the factories or districts for which each surgeon is appointed ; but every such appointment, and every order annulling such appointment, might be revoked by the Secretary of State upon appeal made to him. And the inspector of the district is required to make known the names of the certifying surgeons to the occu- piers of the factories in that district ; but no surgeon being the occupier of a factory, or having a beneficial interest in any factory, shall be a certifying surgeon. A form of certificate is given in the schedule annexed to the Act, and the former counter-signature is dis- pensed with. By section 10, no surgical certificate given by any than a certifying surgeon shall be of any force unless given by a person duly authorized by an university or college, or other public body having such authority, to practise surgery or medicine, and countersigned, according to the form to the Act annexed, by a justice, not being the occupier of a factory, nor the father, son, or CONTAGIOUS AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES. 87 brother of the occupier of a factory, in the presence of tlie person named therein, and upon proof of his identity. By section 11, personal inspection of the person named in the certi- ficate is required, and the examination of the person and signature of the surgical certiiicate must be made at the factory, except special cause be allowed by an inspector ; and if a certifying surgeon refuses such certificate, he must specify in writing, according to the form given, his reasons for such refusal. By section 12, the occupier of a foctory and the certifying surgeon may agree in writing for the payment for the exami- nation of persons for whom surgical certificates are required ; and if the terms of such agreement are in conformity with the regulations for the guidance of surgeons which shall be made by the inspector of the district, and shall be countersigned by the inspector, all penalties incurred by either party for breach of the contract may be recovered as other penalties under this Act may be recovered, and shall be applied as other penalties under this Act are to be applied, and no such agreement shall be liable to stamp duty. By section 13, an inspector shall fix the amount of fees to be paid by the occupier of a factory to the certifying surgeon, and also the times when such surgeon shall visit such factory, provided he be re- quired to fix such fees and visits by such occupier. And such fees shall in no case, where the surgeon shall examine more than one per- son, exceed Is. for each person, together with 6d. for every half mile beyond one mile from such surgeon's residence, and such fees, in- cluding mileage, shall not be less than I*, nor more than 5s. for any one visit, except he have to examine on any one visit more than ten persons, in which case he shall receive Qd. per head, instead of all other fees ; and where the factory is situate within one mile of such surgeon's residence the fee shall not exceed 2s. Gd. for each visit, except he shall at any one visit examine more than five persons, in which case he shall receive Gd. per head, instead of all other fees ; and no certifying surgeon shall receive more than Gd. for any certificate signed by him elsewhere than at the factory. Further, by the 22nd section, if an accident should occur in a factory causing any bodily injury to any person employed therein, so as to prevent such person from returning to his work before nine on the following morning, the occupier of the factory or his agent is required within twenty-four hours of such absence to send notice in writing to the surgeon appointed to grant such certifi- cates, and the surgeon shall send a copy of such notice by nost to the sub-inspector of the district, and without delay proceed to such ftictory and fully investigate the cause of such injury, and within twenty-four hours send to the inspector a report thereof. 88 THE PUBLIC HEALTH. Bj the 53rd section, although the surgical certificate shall be evidence in the first instance of the age of the person named therein, it shall not protect any person knowing such person to be less than the age certified from any penalty for employing or con- niving at the employment of such person otherwise than is allowed by the Act ; and in any proceeding for employing any person con- trary to the Act, a declaration in writing by the certifying surgeon, that he has personally examined such person and believes him to be under such age as set forth in such declaration, shall be evidence in the first instance, until the contrary shall be made to appear. In 8 & 9 Vict., c. 29 (an Act to regulate the labour of children, young persons, and women in print works), the above enactments are incorporated. By 16 & 17 Vict., c. 104, the 3 & 4 Wm. IV., c. 103, the 7 & 8 Vict., c. 15, the 10 & 11 Vict., c. 29, and the 13 & 14 Vict., c. 54, as amended by this Act, are to be construed together as one, and all the Factory Acts are, by 27 & 28 Vict., c. 48, directed, by section 6, to be incorporated with it, and to apply to the several manufactures and employments therein mentioned. And finally, by 30 & 31 Vict., c. 103 (1867), entitled "An Act for the extension of the Factory Acts," the 14th section gives power, in the case of blast furnaces and iron mills, to the Secretary of State, by written order, to dis- pense with surgical certificates given by certifying surgeons, and substitute therefor such other regulations as to proof of the age of children and young persons, and of their bodily health and capacity of working daily for the time allowed by such Acts, as he may think expedient. Section II. By the Contagious Diseases Act, 1866, 29 & 30 Vict., c. 35, the A dmiralty or the Secretary of State for War may appoint a medical ofiicer for each of the places to which the Act applies, to be visiting surgeon for the purposes of the Act ; and also a medical officer to be assistant to any such visiting surgeon. And the same authorities may appoint a medical officer to be in- spector of certified hospitals, and another to be an assistant inspector. And the same authorities may provide buildings as hospitals, to be certified as such. And b}' the 15th section, where an information upon oath is laid before a justice by a superintendent (which includes inspector) of police, to the efftct that he has good reason to believe that a woman named in the information is a common prostitute, and either is resi- ■ dent within the limits to which the Act applies, or, being resident w ithin five miles of those limits, has within fourteen days from the CONTAGIOUS AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES. 89 laying of the information, been within those limits for the purpose of prostitution — which power is extended by the 32 & 33 Vict., c. 90, amending the former Act and repealing the above section, to women resident within ten miles of those limits, or having no settled place of abode, who have, within the period before named, been either within those limits for the purpose of prostitution, or been outside of those limits for the same purpose, in the company of men resident within those limits — the justice may direct a notice to be served upon such w^oraan ; and whether she appears or not in obedience to such summons, upon proof of its due service upon her the justice present, on evidence given upon oath substantiating the charge, may order the woman to be subject to a periodical medical examination by the visiting surgeon for any period not exceeding one year. Time and place for conducting such examination are to be specified in the order. And further, any woman in any place to which the Act applies may voluntarily, by a submission in writing duly signed, subject herself to such medical examination. The visiting surgeon is to prescribe the times and places at which such woman is to attend for examination from time to time. And if any such woman is found to be affected with a contagious disease, or is in such a condition that she eannot be properly examined at that time, she shall be liable to be detained in a certified hospital — in the latter case for not more than five days — to enable the surgeon properly to examine her ; and the visiting surgeon shall sign a certificate in triplicate that she is so afi'ected, or that he believes she is, naming the hospital in which she is to be placed, and one of the oriirinals shall be delivered to the woman, and the others to the superintendent of police. And any such woman may, if she thinks fit, place herself in the certified hospital named in the certi- ficate, for medical treatment ; but if after certificate she neglects to do so, the superintendent of police, or a constable acting under his orders, shall apprehend her and convey her to the hospital, where she shall be detained until she receives a written discharge by the chief medical officer of such hospital. The certificate before mentioned shall be both a sufficient autho- rity for apprehending and detaining her. The inspector of such hospitals may direct the transfer of such woman from one hospital to another. But no woman is to be de- tained uuder any one certificate for a longer period than three months, unless the chief medical officer of the hospital, and the in- spector of such hospitals, or the visiting surgeon for tlie place whence she came or was brought, conjointly certify that her further detention for medical treatment is requisite, in which case she may be detained until discharged by the chief medical officer in writing, 90 THE PUBLIC HEALTH. but SO that no woman be detained under one certificate for a longer time in the whole than six mouths, extended by sec. 7 of the Act of 1869 to nine mouths. A justice may interpose to discharge the ■woman, if the chief medical officer refuses to discharge her, if upon reasonable evidence he be satisfied that she is free from such disease ; and upon her discharge she shall be sent to the place of her resi- dence, if she desires, without expense to herself. If a woman has ceased to be a common prostitute, and desires to be relieved from the periodical medical examination, she being not under detention at the time in a certified hospital, the visiting surgeon may, upon proof that she has so ceased, by written order direct that she be relieved. Such are the chief provisions of these Acts, so far as they relate to the duties of the medical officers. The places to which the Acts apply are — Aldershot. Sheerness. Canterbury. ShorncliiFe. Chatham. Southampton. Colchester. "Winchester. Dover. Windsor. Gravesend. Woolwich. Maidstone. The Curragh. Plymouth and Devouport. Cork. Portsmouth. Queenstown. VACCINATION. Section III. The Acts relating to vaccination are the 3 & 4 Vict., c. 29 : amended by 4 & 5 Vict., c. 32 ; extended and made compulsory by 16 & 17 Vict., c. 100; consolidated and amended by the present Act (1867). By this Act (the 30 & 31 Vict., c. 84), the former Acts, together with certain clauses in others incidentally connected with the duties of registrars, are with certain exceptions, repealed. The guardians of every union or parish where the same shall not have been divided into districts for the purpose of vaccination, are directed — unless such union or parish be of so limited an extent as not to require subdivision, in which case it shall be treated as a vaccination district — forthwith to divide it into districts for the per- formance of vaccination, and they shall enter into a contract with some duly registered medical practitioner for the vaccination of all persons resident within the district. No person to be appointed such public vaccinator, or act as deputy to such, who shall not possess the qualifications required by the Privy Council. CONTAGIOUS AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES. 91 The Privy Council may order to be paid to such public vaccinators, over and above the payments received from the guardians, further payments not exceeding 1*. for each child whom the vaccinator has successfully vaccinated during the time to which the award relates. Such contracts shall only provide for payment for successful vaccinations — for every such vaccination done at an appointed station at or within one mile from the residence of the vacci- nator, or in the workhouse, not less than Is. Qd. ; at any station over one mile and under two from his residence, not less than 2s. ; at any station over two miles, not less than Ss. In respect of success- ful vaccinations performed elsewhere, payment to be according to terms specified in the contract. The parent of every child born in England is required, within three months after its birth, or where, by reason of the death of the parent or otherwise, any other person shall have the custody of such child, such person is required, within three months after receiving such child, to cause it to be vaccinated by the public vaccinator or some medical practitioner. And if the operation is performed by the public vaccinator, the child is to be again brought to him within one week to be inspected, and, if neces- sary, to be re-vaccinated and again inspected. If a child has been three times unsuccessfully vaccinated, and is insusceptible of vaccination, or has already had the small-pox, upon the public vaccinator or medical practitioner delivering a certificate to that effect the child shall no longer be required to be vaccinated. Every public vaccinator, having successfully vaccinated any child, is required within twenty-one days after the operation to transmit, by post or otherwise, a certificate to that effect to the registrar of births and deaths of the district within which the birth was registered ; but if such is unknown to him, then to tbe registrar within whose district the operation was performed, and upon request to deliver a duplicate thereof to the parent or otherwise, for which certificate no fee is to be charged. If paid by the child's parent, &c., for per- forming the operation, he shall not be entitled to payment under his contract also, and vice versa. Where the operation is privately performed by a private medical practitioner, the parent, or otherwise, shall submit a certificate to be signed by him, and shall within twenty-one days transmit it as aforesaid. The penalty for neglecting to cause such child to be vaccinated, or after vaccination to be inspected, without reasonable excuse, is 20s. upon summary conviction. Any person, as before mentioned, who sliall neglect to transmit any certificate required of him within the time specified, and every public vaccinator who shall refuse to deliver the duplicate to the parent, &c., on request, and every medical practitioner who shall refuse to fill up and sign the certificate of successful vaccination, shall be liable to the same 92 THE PUBLIC HEALTH. peDalty ; and every person who shall wilfully sign a false certificate or duplicate shall be punishable for a misdemeanour. By the 32nd section of this Act, any person who shall hereafter produce, or attempt to produce, in any person, by inoculation with variolous matter, or by wilful exposure to variolous matter, or to any matter, article, or thing impregnated with variolous matter, or by any other means whatsoever produce the disease of small-pox in any person, shall be liable to be proceeded against summarily, and if convicted to be imprisoned for one year. Upon an appeal to the Court of Queen's Bench from a conviction of the magistrates of Huntingdon, the point raised upon the appeal was. Did a previous conviction emancipate the appellant from all liability to future penalties for persistently refusing to have his child (a girl under fourteen years of age) vaccinated ; or was he liable to punishment and a fresh conviction every time he was in- formed against, as for a contempt of the law ? According to the old Act, 16 and 17 Vict., c. 100, notice with respect to the vaccination of children had to be given by the registrar before the child reached the age of four months ; and by a decision of the Court of Queen's Bench in 1862 (Eilcher v. Stafford), it was decided that under that Act there was no power to convict a parent a second time for non-compliance with the law. The Act of 1867, however (30 & 31 Vict., c. 84), was intended to remedy the defects of the old law, and by sec. 31 extended the age of children during which compulsory vaccinatioil could be enforced to fourteen years. It also provided that upon the production of a medical certificate that a child was an unfit subject for vaccination, there was not to be a conviction (sec. 18). In the present case there was such a certificate ; but inasmuch as the magistrates came to the conclusion that the prac- titioner furnishing it had been influenced iu giving it by his own conclusions as an opponent of the vaccination theory, they again convicted the appellant. The Chief Justice, in giving judgment, said that although the sections of the new Act were very inconsistent with each other, still upon the w^hole he was able to come to the conclusion that the magistrates were justified in their decision. It might be that they had decided too hastily that the medical practitioner had allowed his mind to be warped by certain theories respecting the advantages of vaccination ; but that involved a ques- tion of fact with which this Court had nothing to do. (Allen, ap- pellant, V. Worthy, respondent — in the Court of Queen's Bench, before the Lord Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Mellor, and Mr. Justice Hannen, Jan. 15, 1870.) By this decision convictions under this Act may follow toties quoties — a parent is charged with being in continual contempt of the law. 93 CHAPTER XI. THE LAW EELATINa TO IDIOTS, LUNATICS, OE PERSONS OF TN- SOUND MIND, AND INCAPABLE OE MANAGING THEIR OWN AFFAIRS ; AS ALSO THE NATURE AND DEGREE OF INSANITY WHICH WILL RELIEVE A PERSON FROM THE PENAL CONSE- QUENCES OF CRIME. It would be quite inconsistent with tlie object and character of this work to enter upon the abstract question of insanity, or to attempt to give any dogmatic definition of that unhappy malady. Much less would it be consistent with that impartiality which dif- ferent schools of thought have alike a right to expect in a treatise, not upon the theory of disease, whether mental or bodily, but upon the practical application of the laws towards the general alleviation of human infirmity, that any particular view should be promi- nently indicated as containing a more accurate or comprehensive definition than another. Medical practitioners may have to certify to the sanity or in- sanity of a person, whether with a view to a civil temporary de- tention of such person, for the protection of himself and his pro- perty, or for the purpose of saving him from the infliction of a penalty which he has already, perhaps, most justly incurred, but which from his subsequent loss of reason it would be barbarous to carry into eftect. In these cases the medical practitioner must ace upon his own judgment and belief, always bearing in mind the heavy responsibility attaching to his decision, both as regards society as well as the individual, and remembering that he ought at any time to be prepared, as he may at any time be called upon, to give the reasons of the decision at which he has arrived. On the other hand, the medical witness in a court of justice may be required to state symptoms for the guidance of others (that is, of the jury). He may be cross-examined as to his definition of insanity ; and if asked his opinion upon a certain state of facts (as in some cases is permitted, as we shall presently see), he should be prepared with a clear and comprehensible definition, avoiding as much as possible professional technical terms, and should be able to give a lucid and sound reason for the opinion he may have formed. 94; THE LAW RELATING TO Bearing these remarks in mind, it is proposed now to consider the first class of cases, in which a medical man is requested to examine, with a view to ulterior proceedings, an individual suspected of insanity. He may be requested by the private friends — by some civil authority, from the Lord High Chancellor to the Board of Guardians of the neighbouring TJniou ; or he may, in the case of a criminal charge, be deputed by the local magistrates, by the Judge at the assizes, or by Her Majesty's Secretary of State, to undertake this always delicate and sometimes most difficult task. Take the following piece of legislation on this subject as relating to public oflences. By 1 & 2 Vict., c. 14, s. 2, in all cases of persons then in custody, as apprehended under circumstances that denote a derangement of mind and a purpose to commit crime, under or by virtue of any warrant or commitment made by any justice of the peace ; and after the passing of the Act, in the cases of persons who shall be discovered and apprehended under circumstances that denote a derangement of mind and a purpose of committing some crime for which if committed such persons would be liable to be indicted, it shall be lawful for any two justices of the peace to call to their assistance a physician, surgeon, or apothecary, and if upon such view and examination and due proof they should be satisfied that such persons are insane or dangerous idiots, they are empowered to direct the removal of such persons to the county lunatic asylum, &c. By the 3rd section. — In the case of any person in custody at the time of the passing of the Act, having been apprehended under the above circumstances, if it appeared upon examination, &c., by the physician, &c., as before appointed, that such person was not insane and might be suffered to go at large with safety, such medical person is thereby reqiiired to give a certificate to that effect, to be forwarded to the Secretary of State, who, if he shall think fit, shall order the liberation of such person from custody. This Act is referred to principally as an illustration of the immense importance of a correct judgment in such matters. Here are two magistrates and a Secretary of State trusting entirely to the judgment of, perhaps, an apothecary, as to whether persons already in custody, under circum- stances denoting a derangement of mind and a purpose of com- mitting crime, are to be at once let loose upon society, to say nothing of the personal liberty of such persons, as well as that of those not as yet committed, being almost entirely dependent upon the like judgment, requiring much scientific knowledge and medical acumen. Attain : by 3 & 4 Vict., c. 54, if any person while im- prisoned under any sentence of death, &c., or under a charge of any offence, or for not finding bail, or in consequence of auy PERSONS OF UNSOUND MIND. 95 summary conviction, shall appear to be insane, any two justices of the peace, with the aid of two physicians or surgeons, are empowered to inquire as to the sanity of such person ; and upon such person being certified to be insane, a Secretary of State shall, upon receipt of such certificate, direct the removal of such person to a lunatic asylum, there to be detained in custody until it is duly certified to the proper authorities by two physicians or surgeons that such person has become of sound mind. The provisions of this Act were no doubt grossly abused in the case of Townley, a prisoner under sentence of death, and a great scandal arose to the medical profession. The certificates of the medical men summoned by the justices, attesting insanity, resulted in a reprieve at almost the last moment. Upon some medical commissioners being sent subsequently — i.e., within a month from the date of these certificates — to examine the state of mind of the prisoner, they reported hira to be of sound mind ; but as, after such an anxious interim, it would have been impossible to execute the capital sentence, it was commuted to penal servitude for life. It is right to add that the prisoner afterwards destroyed him- self. These instances of the responsibility attaching to medical evidence in such cases are probably sufficient for the purposeintended. Although this case led to an alteration in the practice of the law, as will be subsequently seen, the principle involved remains the same. Such evidence being embodied in certificates is, of course, of a more general character, and less open to criticism than that given orally in open Court. Before, however, entering upon the subject of evidence in open Court, a brief review of some of the provisions of the Lunacy Acts may here be introduced. According to 16 & 17 Vict., c. 97, s. 74, no person (not a pauper) can be received into or detained in any asylum without a written order from some person, and an annexed statement of particu- lars of such person, and two medical certificates signed by two physicians, surgeons, or apothecaries, not being in partnership, nor the one an assistant to the other, and each of whom shall separately from the other have personally examined the person to whom the certificate relates, not more than seven clear days pre- vious to the reception of tlie person into the said asylum, and such order, as before mentioned, may be signed before or after the medical certificates, or either of them. But under special circum- stances, to be set forth in the statement, the certificate of one medical practitioner will suffice, provided that within three days from the reception of the patient two other such certificates shall be signed by two other medical practitioners, each of whom shall not be in partnership with or assistant to the other, or the medical practitioner who signed the certificate on which the patient was 96 THE LAW RELATING TO received. See Schedule (F), Nos. 2 & 3. And any person detain- ing such patient in an asylum for more than three days without such further certificates shall be guilty of a misdemeanour, and the like if he receives such person without such order and certificate or certificates. Lunatics found so by inquisition are excepted from these regulations (25 & 26 Vict., c. Ill, s. 22). Form of Medical Certificates in tlie Cage of Private Persons (not Paupers). I, the undersigned, being a physician, surgeon, or apothecary (as the case may be) [here set aid the qualification entitling the person certifying to practise as a physician, surgeon, or apothecary, ex. gra., being a Fellow of the Eoyal College of Physicians of England], and being in actual practice as a physician, surgeon, or apothecary {as the case may he}, hereby certify that I, on the day of at \Jiere insert the * street and number of the house {if any) or other the particulars'], in the county of [in any case where more than one medical certificate is required hy this Act, here insert, separately from any other medical practitioner], personally examined A. B., of [insert residence, and profes- sion or occupation, if any], and that the said A. B. is a lunatic (or an idiot, or a person of unsound mind), and a proper person to be taken charge of, and detained under care and treatment, and that I have formed this opinion upon the following grounds — viz , facts indicating insanity observed by myself [here state the facts']. Other facts (if any) indicating insanity, communicated to me by others [here state the information, and from who^n]. (Signed) (Place of abode.) Dated this day of , 18 . By section 10 of 16 & 17 Yict., c. 96, the medical practitioner certifying is required to specify the facts upon which he has formed his opinion as to the lunacy, idiotcy, or unsoundness of mind of the person referred to in the certificate, and to distinguish such facts observed by himself from those communicated to him by others ; and no person shall be received into any registered hospital, or licensed house, or as a single patient, under any certificate which purports to be founded only upon facts communicated by others, and a similar requirement is contained in 16 & 17 Yict., c. 97, s. 75. And by section 11, power is given, after the reception of the lunatic, to amend the order or the certificate or certificates upon which he was received, if incorrect or defective, within fourteen days next after the reception of such lunatic, provided such amendment * For want of this particularity such a certificate was held to be bad. (Keg. V. Pinder, 24 L. J., Q. B. 148.) PERSONS OF UNSOUND MIND. 97 sTiall receive the sanction of one or more of the commissioners. Of course the definition of " [)hysician, surgeon, &c.," is now regulated by the Medical Acts. (See 25 & 26 Vict., c. Ill, s. 47.) And by the 12th section, no medical practitioner, who. or whose father, brother, son, partner, or assistant is wholly or partly pro- prietor of, or a regular professional attendant in a licensed house or hospital shall sign any certificate for the reception of a patient into such house or hospital. And no medical practitioner shall, by himself or his agents, board or lodge in any unlicensed house, or take the charge of any person upon any certificate signed by him- self, his father, brother, son, partner, or assistant ; and no such medical practitioners, having signed any certificate, shall be the regular professional attendant of such person while under care under such certificate ; and no such medical practitioners, who, or whose fathers, brothers, sons, partners, or assistants respectively, shall sign the order required for the reception of a patient, shall sign any certificate for the reception of the same patient. A similar provision is contained in 16 & 17 Vict., c. 97, s. 76. And any one pecuniarily interested in the payments made by or on account of any patient, and any " Medical Attendant," as defined by the Lunacy Act, 8 & 9 A^ict., c. 100, shall be prohibited from signing any certificate or order for the reception of a private patient into any licensed or other house (25 & 26 Vict., c. Ill, s. 24), the defi- nition of " medical attendant" being " every physician, surgeon and apothecary who shall keep any licensed house, or shall in his medical capacity attend any licensed house, or any asylum, hospital, or other place where any lunatic shall be confined." These regulations, it will be seen, are very stringent, and require to be rigidly adhered to, as medical practitioners giving false certi- ficates, or any one signing a certificate as a medical man when he is not so, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanour (section 18) ; but a medical practitioner doing any act contrary to the provisions of this Act (and not declared to be a misdemeanour) shall for every such offence forfeit 201. With respect to evidence adduced in open court, especially in criminal cases, the extreme importance of the subject demands the consideration which it deserves. And here, it may be observed, the medical witness should above all tilings avoid making hmiself appear in the light of a partisan of any particular medical theory, or as a sympathizer with either side. The facts of the case are all the witness has to consider, even if asked his opinion upon the case itself. The judge ar.d the jury have to decide upon the responsibility of the prisoner, and the medical evidence should be confined to the question whether the accused is insane in the sense in which it is understood by law. The medical witness may be asked whether H 98 THE LAW RELATING TO in Lis opinion such and such acts amount to insanity, but he has nothing whatever to do with the question of responsibility. It is for the jury to say whether the accused knew the nature of the act he was committing, anfl whether or not he knew he was doing wrong. Although, in general, a witness cannot be asked what his opinion upon a particular question is, since he is called for the purpose of speaking as io facts only, yet, where matter of skill and judgment is involved, a person competent to give an opinion may be asked what that opinion is. Thus, an engineer may be called to say what, in his opinion, was the cause of a harbour being blocked up. (Folkes V. Chad., 3 Douglas 157, 4 TermEep. 498, S.C.) It is the constant practice to examine medical men as to their judgment with regard to the cause of a person's death who has suffered vio- lence ; and where, on a trial for murder, the defence was insanity, the judges to whom the point was referred were all of opinion that in such a case a witness of medical skill might be asked whether, in his judgment, such and such appearances were symptoms of insanity, and whether a long fast, followed by a draught of strong liquor, was likely to produce a paroxysm of that disorder in a person subject to it. Several of the judges doubted whether the witness could be asked his opinion on the very point which the jury were to decide — viz., whether, from the other testimony given in the case, the act with which the prisoner was charged was, in his opinion, an act of insanity. (E. v. Wright, Eussell and Eyland, 456.) On the authority of the above case. Justice Park, on an indictment for cutting and maiming, allowed a medical man who had heard the case to be asked whether the facts and appearances proved showed symptoms of insanity. (R. v. Searle, 1 Moo. & E. 75.) And it seems, in M'Naughten's case, such questions were allowed to be asked. (2 Eussell on Crimes, by Grreaves, 925 n). A ques- tion may arise in these cases whether, where a witness, a medical man, called to give his opinion as a matter of skill, has made a report of the appearances or state of facts at the time, he may be allowed to read it as part of his evidence. The practice in Scotland is as follows : — A scientific witness is always directed to read his report, as affording the best evidence of the appearances he was . called on to examine ; yet he may be, and generally is, subjected to a further examination by the prosecutor's counsel, or to a cross- examination on the prisoner's part ; and if he is called on to state any facts in the case unconnected with his scientific report — as •conversations with the deceased, confessions made to him by the prisoner, or the like — he stands in the situation of an ordinary witness, and can only refer to the memoranda to refresh his memory. (Alison's Practice Crim. Law of Scotland, p. 541.) Without venturing to give a distinct scientific definition of insanity, it may be mentioned that the law does not recognise litoral PERSONS OF UNSOUND MIND. 99 insanity ; indeed, it would be a higlily dangerous doctrine to hold as irresponsible those who, however perverted may be their afiee- tions or moral feelings, have given no indications of disturbed reason. For, after all, in every case of true insanity the intellec- tual disturbance is more or less present, however difficult sometimes it may be of detection. Moral insanity is not, therefore, admitted as a bar to responsibility in either civil or criminal cases, except in 80 far as it may be accompanied by intellectual disturbance ; and even intellectual disturbance, if limited to the aftection of insane delusions, will not be a bar to criminal responsibility if the accused, even though acting under the influence of the insane delusion, but not in other respects insane, and the act with which he is charged being at the same time contrary to the law of the land, he had a sufficient degree of reason to know that he was doing an act that ■was wrong. The accused in such case is assumed to know that the act was contrary to the law of the land, as the law is administered upon the principle that every man must be taken conclusively to know it, without proof that he does know it. Indeed, no actual knowledge of the law is essential in order to lead to a conviction ; but if the accused was labouring under such a defect of reason from disease of the mind as not to know the nature and quality of the act he was doing, or, if he did know it, that he did not know he was doing wrong, that is such a degree of insanity and such a quality of insanity as alone will relieve a person from criminal responsibility. (See Answers of the Judges to the House of Lords, M'Naughten's case, ante, vide Appendix.) Insanity is frequently feigned by persons accused of criminal offences in order to procure an acquittal or discharge. The follow- ing remarks (the result of a learned judge's experience, as furnished to Dr. Taylor by the writer himself) may be useful to those engaged in the preliminary examination of such persons. " It may be safely- held that a person feigning insanity will rarely, if ever, try to prove himself to be sane ; for he runs the great risk of satisfying others that he is sane — the conclusion he desires to avoid. But there is no better proof, in general, that the insanity (supposing other evi- dence to be strong) is real, than keen, eager attempts by the accused to prove that he is sane, and strong and indign.-nit remonstrances against being held to be insane, although that would protect himself against trial and punishment." (Taylor's Medical Jurisprudence, p. 85.) One question asked by the House of Lords of the judges in M'Naughten's case was, " Can a medical man, conversant with the disease of insanity, who never saw the prisoner previous to the trial, but was present during the whole trial and the examination of all the witnesses, be asked his opinion as to the state of the pri- soner's mind at the time of the commission of the alleged crime, or h2 100 THE LAW RELATING TO his opinion whether the prisoner was conscious at the time of doing the act that he was acting contrary to hiw, or whether he was labouring under any and wliat delusion at the time ?" In answer thereto the judges said, " We think the medical man, under the circumstances supposed, cannot in strictness be asked his opinion in the terms above stated, because each of those questions involves the determination of the truth of the facts deposed to, which it is for the jury to decide : and the questions are not mere questions upon a matter of science, iu which case such evidence is admissible. But where the facts are admitted, or not disputed, and the ques- tion becomes substantially one of science only, it may be convenient to allow the question to be put in that general form, though the same cannot be insisted on as a matter of right." It may be convenient here to mention a case of feigned insanity, which shows how easily medical men as well as non-professional persons may be deceived by a skilful impostor. At the Lewes Winter Assizes, Dec. 1856, the prisoner (E. v. Ball), a ticket-of-leave man, was convicted of housebreaking and sentenced to fifteen years' transportation. After the trial, and when in gaol, the prisoner simulated madness so successfully that he effectually deceived tliree visiting justices and two medical men ; and a certificate was about to be signed for his removal to a lunatic asylum, when the deception was discovered by the man having made a confidant of one of his fellow-prisoners. He had previously, in 1851, after having been convicted of robbery at Leicester, whence he was sent to Millbank, feigned insanity, and succeeded on that occasion in deceiving the medical officers, who certified that he was a lunatic, and he was accordingly removed to Bethlehem Hospital, where after two years he obtained a ticket-of-leave. Doubtless there have been many inconsistent verdicts arrived at by juries, but the general tendency of such a tribunal is to lean to the side of a merciful construction of the acts of an accused, especially where a plea of insanity is set up ; but until juries are taken from a more educated class of society they can scarcely be expected to exhibit that nice appreciation of subtle distinctions which the medical witness too frequently endeavours to import into the case. They may be, for the most part, men of good common sense, perfectly capable of judging from the evidence whether the accused knew at the time of the commission of the offence that he was doing that which was wrong, and yet may be wholly incompetent to deal with subtle distinctions between "de- mentia," "amentia," "mania," "dipsomania," or even " lunacy," or the pathological causes of any such forms of insanity. The object of the law is to present to them the case shorn of technicalities, and to ask then) whether they believe, in the case before them, that the prisoner was at the time labouring under such a total defect of PERSONS OF UNSOUND MIND. 101 reason that he was wholly unconscious that he was doing wrong. In Friince the juries, at least in capital cases, are taken from the superior classes of society. They are comprised of men of intellect, education, and position ; but with us such persons enjoy a privi- leged exemption, practically, from serving on common and petty juries, being for the most part on the grand jury or special jury panel of the assizes ; and at quarter sessions, where now all cases except those of the greatest magnitude are triable, these same classes compose the bench of magistrates who there act as judges ; and the quarter sessions grand jury absorbs the class immediately below these in the social scale, — so that the petty jury panel, both at quarter sessions and assizes, is necessarily composed of but one class, viz., the small shopkeepers or farmers, men whose very avocations, be it said without any disparagement to their gene- ral good sense, are but ill calculated to prepare their minds for the consideration and decision of abstruse and subtle disqui- sitions on points of science, after all, more curious than practical. JVitJi respect to civil cases, or the rules tvhich slwuJd regulate a medical practitioner's conduct in dealing with idiots, lunatics, or persons of unsound mind and incapable of managing their oivn offairs. As this treatise professes to be neither a work on Medical Juris- prudence nor yet one on the general Law of Lunacy, but simply on the laws relating to the Medical Profession, a disquisition on the Law of Lunacy would not be within its province or scope, any more than would a treatise on Forensic Medicine, in itself an exhaustive subject, be compatible with the limits prescribed to the author. A. medical practitioner may sometimes be called upon, not only to certify, but also to make affidavit, as to the state of mind of a person the subject of a petition for the issue of a commission " De lunatico inquirendo," or in the nature of " De lunatico inquireudo." The costs of this inquiry, which have frequently been ruinously expensive, are not only greatly reduced by 16 & 17 Vict., c. 70, but the process very much simplified by 25 & 20 Vict., c. 86, termed " The Lunacy Eegulation Act, 1862," where the property of the alleged lunatic does not exceed lOOOZ. in value, or the income thereof does not exceed 50Z. per annum ; and the 3rd section enacts that " the inquiry to be made under every order or commission of lunacy or issue shall be confined to the question, whether or not the person who is the subject of the inquiry is at the time of such inquiry of unsound mind, and incapable of managing himself or his afl'airs, and no evidence as to anything done or said by such person, or as to his demeanour or state of mind at any time being more than two years before the time of the inquiry, shall be receivable in proof of insanity on any such inquiry, or on the trial of any traverse of an inquisition, unless the judge or master shall otherwise direct." 102 THE LAW RELATING TO By the 12tli section, " where by the report of one of the Masters in Lunacy, or of the Commissioners in Lunacy, or by affidavit or other- wise, it is established, to the satisfaction of the Lord Chancellor, that any person is of unsound mind and incapable of managing his aftairs, and that his property does not exceed the amount before-mentioned, the Lord Chancellor, without directing any inquiry under a com- mission of lunacy, may make such order as he may consider ex- pedient for the purpose of rendering the property of such person, or the income thereof, available for the maintenance or benefit of or for carrying on his trade or business : Provided that the alleged insane person shall have such personal notice of the application for such order as the Lord Chancellor shall by general order direct." Under this Act medical practitioners may frequently be called upon to assume almost the entire responsibility of furnishing upon affidavit the information required in such cases, and it therefore becomes of the utmost importance to consider the meaning of the term " unsound mind" as applicable to such proceedings. In re W. F. Windham, a case which excited at the time much public interest, the law was thus stated by the Master in summing up to the jury : — " What the jury had to decide was, whether Mr. Windham was of such sound mind as to be able to govern himself and his affairs. In the time of Lord Hardwicke it was necessary to find a man absolutely insane ; but in 1802, Lord Eldon declared that the Court of Chancery thought itself authorized to issue a commission, pro- vided it were made out that the party was unable to act with any proper and provident management, was liable to be robbed by any one, or (and ?) was labouring under that imbecility of mind which, though not strictly insanity, equally required the protection of the law. Lord Lyndhurst, in 1827, adopted the ruling of Lord Eldon, which might be taken, therefore, as an authoritative declaration of the law of England. Another doctrine laid down by Lord Eldon, and sanctioned by his successors, was, that if a jury found merely the incapacity of an alleged lunatic to manage his affairs, and did not infer from it unsoundness of mind, upon that finding a commission could not go on, though the party might be living where he was exposed to ruin every instant. From all this it resulted that, in order to justify a verdict against Mr. Windham, the jury must be satisfied that he was incapable of governing himself and his aftairs by reason of unsoundness of mind. Mere weakness of character ; mere liability to impulse or susceptibility of influence, good or bad ; mere imprudence, extravagance, recklessness, eccentricity, or immorality — no, not all these put together would suffice, unless they believed themselves justified, on a view of the whole evidence, in referring them to a morbid condition of intellect." — Times, 30th January, 1862. PERSONS OF UNSOUND MIND. 103 The distinction between an idiot and a lunatic, or person of un- sound mind, was important in the early state of tlie law, as tlie custody of the idiot (or idiota a natioitcite) and his lands were vested in the lord of the fee, and eventually by common consent in the King, as lord paramount and " pater patriae," that he might at the death of the idiot render the same to the right heirs, fiuding the idiot in the interim necessaries alone. An idiot was deemed a natural fool — one that hath no understanding from his nativity — and therefore presumed by law never likely to attain any (Fitz- herbert's JVatura Brevium, 233) ; whereas in the case of a lunatic, or rather a non compos — for the word " lunaticus" is not used in the original writ or early statute on the subject, but the definition in the writ is idiota a casu et infirmitate, and in the statute " aliquis qui prius habuit memoriam et intellectum non fuerit compos mentis suo sicut quidani sunt perlucida iutervalla," the King provided for the safe custody of their lands without waste or destruction, and the competent maintenance of their households, with the profits of the same, and the residue, after thus providing for their sustenance, was to be kept for their use, to be delivered up to them when they were restored to their right mind ; so that their lands and tene- ments should in no respect be alienated — and the King took nothing of the profits to his own use. But now for the purposes of the inquiry in the nature of " De lunatico," the distinction is of no moment. Important changes have of late years been made in the law on this subject by 16 & 17 Vict., c. 70, and 25 & 26 Viet., c. 86 ; one object of which has been the " removing or diminishing the delays and expenses now attending in the execution of com- missions in the nature of writs ' De lunatico inquirendo,' and the proceedings consequent on inquisitions taken thereon." The 25 & 26 Vict., c. S6, amending the 16 & 17 Vict., c. 70, de- clares in sec. 2 that the word " lunatic" as used in the Acts is to be construed to mean " any person found, by inquisition, idiot, lu- natic, or of unsound mind, and incapable of managing himself or his aftairs," so that it is now quite unnecessary to consider within which definition to describe an alleged non compos. It is suflicieut that he be found to be of unsound mind, and incapable of managing himself or his aj"airs. But upon this very point a medical witness may be summoned to give evidence either ^>ro or con, and here it may be repeated no amount of intemperance, not even notorious drunken and profligate habits, will satisfy therequiremeuts of the statute, unless such, to use the words of the Master in Mr. Windham's case, can be referred " to a morbid condition of intellect." "Drunkenness alone," said Lord Cottenham, "is not sufficient." But if the mind is completely weakened by habitual drunkenness, so that it can no longer be deemed sound, though such unsoundness was originally contracted Dy this vice, such a state, coupled with an incapacity of 104< THE LAW RELATING TO managing Lis affairs (and of the incapacity of managing himself in such case there would be no doubt), would satisfy the statute. It may sometimes happen that a medical attendant is asked to witness and perhaps, in the absence of a legal practitioner, to draw up the will of a patient. It should be remembered, therefore, that the witness to a will attests the sanity of the testator, and should he afterwards attempt to impeach the testator's sanity his evidence would be regarded with great suspicion, and would require corrobo- ration. A will made by a lunatic during a lucid interval would be valid. (See Beverley's case, 4 Eep. 1236 ; Kemble v. Church, 5 Haggard, 273.) But then the attesting witnesses would be doubt- less required to prove the lucid interval. Lord Hardwicke has observed, in connexion with this subject, that fraud and imposition upon weakness may be a sufficient ground to set aside a will, al- though such weakness is not a sufficient ground for a commission of lunacy. (2 Vesey, -108.) In Mountain v. Bennett, Cax. 355, a will, after much conflicting evidence as to the testator's mind, was supported principally on the evidence of the attesting witnesses, persons of high character and respectability, who were unanimous as to the testator's sanity and freedom from control. A suspicion is justly entertained of a will in favour of a medical attendant in whose house the testator resided, (James v. Moody, P.C.C. 16 ; Major v. Knight, 4 No. Cas. 661 ; Cockcroft v. Eawles, ib. 237) ; but it seems that this suspicion goes no further than to necessitate somewhat stricter proof as to the testator's cajjacity, though not as to his knowledge of the contents of the will (Barry V. Batlin, 2 Moo. P.C.C. 480) ; for where the capacity be duly proved, the testator will be deemed cognizant of the contents of the will. (Browning v. Budd, 6 Moo. P.C.C. 435.) If a will be rational on the face of it, and it is proved to have been duly executed, it is presumed, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, that it was made by a person of competent understanding. And though an in- quisition finding a man a lunatic is prima facie evidence of lunacy (luring the whole period covered by such inquisition, yet it does not preclude proof that the execution of a will, or any other act, occurred during a lucid interval. (Hall v. Warren, 9 Vesey, 605 ; Cooke v. Cholmondeley, 2 Mac. & Gr. 22 ; and Bannatyne v. Bannatyne, 16 Jurist, 864.) The principle is ably laid down by Sir W. Wynn in Cartwright V. Cartwright, 1 Philli'more, 100 :— " If you can establish," said the learned judge, " that the party afflicted habitually by a malady of the mind has intermissions, and if there was an intermission of the disorder at the time of the act, that being proved is sufficient, and the general habitual insanity will not atiect it; but the effect of it is this, that it inverts the order of proof and of presumption ; for until PERSONS OF UNSOUND MIND. 105 proof of habitual insanity is made, tlie presumption is that the party, like all huinau creatures, was rational ; but where an habitual in- sanity in the mind of the person who does the act is established, then the party who would take advantage of the fact of an interval of reason must prove it." The mere absence, however, of any apparent delusion must not be mistaken for a lucid interval ; the disease may nevertheless exist. To coTistitute a lucid interval, absence of the disease itself, not of the delusion only, must be shown. (Waring v. Waring, 6 Moo. P.C.C. 341, and Creagh v. Blood, 2 J. «fc Lat. 509 ; Dyce Sombre v. Troup, 1 Deane, 22.) As the only object of this dissertation has been to show that the law permits a person of hitherto unsound mind to make a will, if at the time he has recovered his senses and is of a disposing mind ; and as his medical attendant would be the best authority on that point, and would probably be asked to attest, if not, in the absence of legal assistance, even to reduce the patient's wishes to writing, this is thought to be a fitting place to make a few remarks on the same. The statute 1 Vict., c. 26, s. 9, provides " That no will shall be valid unless it shall be in writing, and executed in manner hereinafter mentioned : that is to say, it shall he signed at the foot or end thereof by the testator, or h;j some other person in his behalf and by his direction ; and such signature shall be made or acknowledged by the testator in the presence of two or more witnesses present at the same time ; and such witnesses shall attest and shall subscribe the will in the presence of the testator, but no form of attestation shall be necessary T In the first place. — Two witnesses are required. Secondly. — The signature of the testator must be somewhere near to the end of the instrument, and so as not to be im- mediately over, or preceding any of the dispositive parts of the instrument, but it need not immediately follow, or be under any of the dispositive parts ; whereas formerly the sig- nature might be in any part of the instrument. Thirdly. — The signature of the testator is to be " made," or " ac- knowledged" in the simultaneous presence of the witnesses. (Moor V. King, 3 Curtis, 243, 2 No. Cas. 45, Si 7 Jurist, 205.) Fourthly. — A form of attestation is expressly dispensed with. There can be no sufficient acknowledgment by the testator of his " signature" unless the witnesses either saw or might have seen the signature, even though the testator should expressly declare to them that the paper to be attested by them is his will. When the witnesses either saw or might have seen the signature, an express acknowledgment of the signature itself is not necessary, a mere statement that the paper is his will — {re Davis, 3 Cm-tis, 748 j 106 THE LAW EELATING TO re Ashraore, xb. 756, and 7 Jurist, 1145) — or a direction to them to put their names under his — {re Philpot, 3 No. Cas. 2. Gaze v. Gaze, 7 Jur. SOS) — or even a request by the testator — (Keigwinz;.Keigwin, 7 Jur. 840) — or by some person in his presence — {re Bosanquet, 2 Rob. 577, Foulds V. Jackson, 6 No. Cas. sup. 1) — to sign the paper is sufficient. AVhen the signature is seen, or expressly acknowledged, it is not material that the witnesses are not told that the instrument is his will — (Keigwin v. Keigwin, supra) — or are deceived into thinking that it is a deed — (Sugden's E.P.S. 334). But see observations of Sir H. J. Fust in Willis v. Lowe, 5 No. Cas. p. 432. To obviate tlie inconvenience arising from decisions under the 9th section of 1 Vict., c. 26, it was enacted by 15 & 16 Vict., c. 24 (framed and introduced by Lord St. Leonards when Lord Chan- cellor), that a will shall be deemed to be valid if the signature be so placed at, or after, or following, or under, or beside, or opposite to, the end of the will, that it shall be apparent on the face of the will that the testator intended to give effect, by such his signature, to the writing signed as his will, and that no such will shall be affected by the circumstance that the signature shall not follow or be im- mediately after the foot or end of the will, or by the circumstance that a blank space shall intervene between the concluding word of the will and signature, or by the circumstance that the signature shall be placed among the words of the testimonium clause, or of the clause of attestation, either with or without a blank space in- tervening, or shall follow, or be after, or under, or beside, the names or one of the names of the subscribing witnesses, or by the circum- stance that the signature shall be on one side or page or other portion of the paper or papers containing the will, whereon no clause or paragraph or disposing part of the will shall be written above the signature, or by the circumstance that there shall appear to be sufficient space on or at the bottom of the preceding side or page, or other portion of the same paper on which the will is written, to contain the signature, and the enumeration of the above cir- cumstances shall not restrict the generality of the above enactment ; but no signature under the said Act or this Act, shall be operative to give effect to any disposition or direction which is underneath, or which follows it : nor shall it give effect to any disposition or direction inserted after the signature shall be made. The law has not made requisite to the validity of a will that it should assume any particular form, or be couched in language technically appropriate to its testamentary character. It is suffi- cient that the instrument, however irregular in form, or inartificial in expression, discloses the intention of the maker respecting the posthumous destination of his property. It is therefore far better for a non-legal person, in drawing up a will, to use plain and simple PERSONS OF UNSOUND MIND. 107 Jangnage, such as he would use in any ordinary written communica- tion, than to affect a technical style and the use of legal phraseology, which, from want of an accurate application of the terms, may only tend to confuse the construction, and to render ambiguous the intention of the testiitor. As the circumstances in every case must more or less vary, it has been thought better not to append any particular form of will, and although no particular form of attesta- tion is necessary, still it is better that the witnesses to the will should subscribe a memorandum of attestation to the effect that — The signature of the testator ivas made, or acknoidedjed hj him in the presence of the witnesses, both being present at the same time, and that they subscribed their names in Ms presence, and in the presence of each other. Of course it is far better that a testator should actually sign, or (where necessary) sign by the hand of another, in the presence of the witnesses, than merely acknowledge the signature before them ; but yet a testator, whether speechless or not, may acknowledge his signature by gestures— (/v Davies, 2 Hob. 337, and Parker v. Parker : Milw., Ir. Eccles. Rep. 545,) and even a mark, thus x> where the testator through ignorance is unable to write, is to be preferred to a signature by the hand of another. A person may not be insane, and may yet be incompetent to make a will. Imbecility, through advanced age or through excessive drinking, or a want of a disposing power of mind, so as not fully to comprehend at the time the nature and extent of his property, nor yet the claims of those who might naturally be supposed to be the objects of his bounty, may destroy testamentary power. (See Swinburne, p. II. ss. 5 & 6.) By the recent Act, 1 Viet., c. 26, if any person shall attest the execution of any will to whom, or to whose ivife or husband, any devise, legacy, or beneficial interest shall be thereby given or made, such devise, legacy, &c., be utterly null and void. As it is not probable that a medical practitioner would be re- quested to attest the execution of a deed, except under the superin- tendence of a legal adviser, deeds being for the most part drawn up by such, and generally executed under circumstances of more de- liberation than wills, it is not thought necessary to introduce that question into this subject. Medical attendants should be careful how they permit themselves to be made confidauts of the secrets of their patients, as they possess no privilege in this respect, but it required, are bound to disclose them in a court of law. Medical visitors, appointed to visit any house or houses licensed for the reception of lunatics under 8 & Vict., c. 100, are entitled to remuneration for their services. But by 23rd section of that Act no person shall act as a commissioner or visitor, or secretary or clerk to the commissioners, or clerk or assistant clerk to any visitors, or 108 THE LAW RELATING TO act in granting any license, who shall within one year next pre- ceding have been directly or indirectly interested in any such house, or the profits arising from the reception of lunatics within it. And no physician or surgeon (being a commissioner), and no physician, surgeon, or apothecary (being a visitor) shall sign any certificate for the admission of any patient into any licensed house or hospital, or shall professionally attend vipon any patient in any such house or hospital, unless he be directed to visit such patient by the person upon whose order such patient has been received into such house or hospital, or by the Lord Chancellor, or by the Secretary of State for the Home Department, or by a committee appointed by the Lord Chancellor ; and if any such shall after his appointment be or become so interested, he shall immediately be disqualified; and if after so becoming disqualified he shall continue to act in such capacity, he shall be guilty of a misdemeanour. And if any such medical commissioner or visitor shall sign any certificate for the admission of any patient into any licensed house or hospital (except as aforesaid), he shall for each ofience forfeit 10?. By the 3rd section, the " Commissioners in Lunacy," some of whom may be physicians or surgeons, shall not, as long as they remain commissioners and receive any salary as such, accept, hold, or carry on any other office or situation, or any profession or employ- ment from which gain or profit shall be derived, the salary allotted under the Act being 1500Z. a year and travelling expenses. By sec. 43, in every hospital there must be a physician, surgeon, or apothecary resident therein, as the superintendent and medical attendant thereof. The provision is diff'erent as to licensed houses. In every house licensed for 100 patients or more, the residence of such medical officer is compulsory. In other cases it is optional, but if there is no resident medical man, the house must be visited regularly by a medical attendant, the frequency of such visits being regulated by the commissioners and visitors according to the number of the patients for which the house is licensed, whether below 11, or below 50, or below 100, as the case may be. {lb. ss. 57 & 58.) A medical visitation book is to be duly kept in every house and hospital by the medical superintendent or attendant in the form prescribed by the Act of 1853 (16 & 17 Vict., c. 70), which super- seded the form given in Schedule H in the Act of 1845 (8 & 9 Vict., c. 100, 8. 59) ; IG & 17 Vict., c. 96, s. 25, and Schedule D. The medical superintendent or attendant is also to keep a book to be called " The Case Book," the form of which the Commissioners in Lunacy are empowered to prescribe by an order under their com- mon seal (8 & 9 Vict., c. 100, s. 60). On the 20th March, 1863, the Commissioners issued an order accordingly, of which the fol- lowing is the substance. Such " Case Book" to contain :— PERSONS OF UNSOUND MIND. 109 " First. A statement of the name, a2;c, sex, and previous occu- pation of the patient, and whether married, sinp;le, or widowed. ^^ Secondly. An accurate description of the external appearance of the patient upon admission, habit of body and temperament, ap- pearance of eyes, expression of countenance, and any peculiarity in form of head ; of the pliysical state of the vascular and respiratory organs, and of the abdominal viscera and their respective func- tions ; of the state of the pulse, tongue, skin, &c. " Thirdly. A descri[)tion of the phenomena of mental disorder, the manner and period of the attack, witli a minute account of the symptoms and the changes produced in the patient's temper or dis- position ; specifying whether the malady displays itself by any, or what illusions, or irrational conduct, or morbid or dangi-rous habits or propensities ; whether it has occasioned any failure of memory or understanding, or is connected with epilepsy or ordinary paralysis, or symptoms of general paralysis, such as tremulous movements of the tongue, defect of articulation, or weakness or unsteadiness of gait. " Fourthly. Every particular which can be obtained respectino- the previous history of the patient ; what are believed to have been the predisposing and exciting causes of the attack; what the previous habits, active or sedentary, temperate or otherwise ; whether the patient has experienced any former attacks, and if so, at what periods; whether any relatives have been subject to in- sanity ; and whether the present attack has been preceded by any premonitory symptoms, such as restlessness, unusual elevation or depression of spirits, or any. remarkable deviation from ordinary habits and conduct ; and whether the patient has undergone any, and what, previous treatment, or been subjected to personal restraint. " Fifllily. During the first mouth after admission entries to be made at least once in every week, and oftener where the nature of the case requires it. Afterwards, in recent or curable cases, entries to be made at least once in every month ; and in chronic cases, subject to little variation, once in every three months. " In all cases an accurate record to be kept of the medicines administered, and other remedies employed, with the results, aud also of all injuries and accidents. " That the several particulars, hereinbefore required to be recorded, be set forth in a manner so clear and distinct as to admit of being easily referred to, and extracted, whenever the Com- missioners shall so require ; " And that the present order be in substitution for that of the 9th January, 18-1(5, and that a copy thereof be inserted at the commencement of the ' Cavse Book.' " The statutes contain numerous and minute provisions with regard to the admission, treatment, discharge, and other important points con- 110 THE LAW EELATING TO nected with the custody, care, and coutrol of the patients received into these establishments. The respective enactments should be carefully- studied in the statutes themselves, (to be found in the Appendix,) as a due observance of them is of the utmost importance, as well for the benefit of the insane persons as for the protection of the medical men and others who are instrumental in confining or detaining them. Independent of the penal liabilities which may be incurred under the 5Gth section of the last-named Act, and under 16 & 17 Vict., c. 96, s. 13, a medical man may be exposed to an action at the suit of a pri- vate person confined under his certificate. Hall v. Semple, 3 F. & P. 337, is an important case on this point. This case arose in 1862, being an action against a physician under whose certificate the plaintifi" had been confined in a lunatic asylum. The following remarks are contained in the summing up of Mr. Justice Crompton : — " If a medical man assumes, under this statute, the duty of signing such a certificate without making, and by reason of his not making, a due and proper examination and such inquiries as are necessary, and which a medical man under such circumstances ought to make and is called on to make, not in the exercise of the extremest possible care, but in the exercise of ordinary care, so that he is guilty of culpable negligence, and danger ensue ; then an action will lie, although there has been no spiteful or improper motive, and though the certificate is not false to his knowledge." " The principal questions," continued the learned Judge, " to which I desire to direct your attention are these — first, whether you think that he signed the certificate, untrue in fact, negligently and im- properly, and without making proper and sufficient inquiries. Now I cannot help thinking that in a matter of this kind, a proceeding upon which a man is to be at once consigned to imprisonment as a lunatic, very considerable care is necessary. It will be for your consideration what degree of care is necessary so as to make out by the absence of it a case of culpable negligence. It is not a mere mistake or error in judgment which would amount to such negligence, but you must be satisfied that there was culpable negli- gence The main question, as it appears to me, is as to negligence or want of reasonable care ; and as to that, the real test, as it appears to me, is how matters would appear to the defendant under all the circumstances ; and you should endeavour, as far as possible, to put yourselves in his situation, and see how far appear- ances were sufficient, without any further inquiries than he made." The learned Judge again repeated : — " Ton are not inquiring into an error in judgment, but whether the defendant has been guilty of that culpable negligence which I have explained and described to you — negligence in not making sufficient inquiries, the examination not having been sufficient in his own judgment. It would be PERSONS OF UNSOUND MIND. Ill dreadful if a man were to suffer merely from an error in judgment. The question is whether there haa been a neglect of tliat duty which a person in a case of this kind owes, not to interfere in a matter wliich touches tlie liberty of his fellow-citizen without taking due care and making a careful examination and inquiry. That is the main question." In answer to questions from the learned judge the jury found specially, on the second count, that on the examination and in- quiries, the defendant did not use due care and caution ; that the certificate was false in fact ; that he signed a certificate untrue in effect, without a proper examination and inquiries, and without probable cause ; and that on that account he was guilty of culpable blameable negligence in not ascertaining the sanity of the plaintifi', who they found to be sane in point of fact. The jury further said, in answer to another question, that the defendant " bond fide believed in the truth of his certificate, from the examination and inquiries which he made, although he made them carelessly." Mr. Justice Crompton. — " Did he think that he was acting under the authority of the Act ? I assume from what you have found, that you mean he bond fide believed he was acting under the au- thority of the Act, and that he was authorized by the Act to do what he did ?" The Juri/.—"' Yes, we think so. He thought he was authorized, although he did it negligently." The learned Judge. — " Then that is a verdict for the plaintiff on the ground of culpable negligence and want of reasonable care or probable cause." Jury.—'' Yes." Verdict for the plaintiff., damarjes 150Z. As to the prosecution of two medical men (Heg- v. Dawson and another) for signing certificates without examining the patient, see Sixth lieport of the Commissioners, p. 19. But at common law, and apart from the Lunacy Statutes, a medical man may justify measures necessary to restrain a dangerous lunatic. So also in the case of a person suffering from delirium tremens, he may justify re- sorting to measures of restrrtint during the continuance of the fit, or whilst it is likely to return, 3 F. & F. 328. (Scott v. Wakem.) On the death of any patient, in any licensed house or hospital, a statement of the cause of death, with the name of any person present at the death, must be drawn up and signed by the medical attendant (8 & 9 Vict., c. 100, s. 55), and a certified copy must be sent by the proprietor or superintendent, within forty-eight hours, to the following persons: — The Comuiis- 112 THE LAW RELATING TO sioners ; the person who signed the order of admission ; the registrar of deaths for the district ; and in the case of a house licensed by justices, the clerk of the visitors (s. 55 ; see also s. 54). The death must be entered in the " Register," and also in the " Book of Admissions," by the proprietor or superintendent (ss. 50 & 54), and m the "Medical Visitation Book," by the medical attendant, (s. 59) and it is further provided by the Act of 1853, that a statement as to the cause of death, and the duration of the fatal disease, shall be entered in the " Case Book," and a certified copy transmitted within two days to the coroner, so that he may hold an inquest if he deems it necessary. (16 & 17 Vict., c. 9G, s. 19.) The various provisions with regard to private lunatics received into public asylums, under the 16 & 17 Vict., c. 97, their admission under an order (or rather request) and medical certificates, the records and returns relating to them, their treatment and ill-treatment, cor- respondence, escape, and recapture, transfer, removal, and discharge, and death, are similar to, though not precisely identical with, those already detailed with respect to private inmates in licensed houses and registered hospitals. Under the head of Restraint it has been held in Anderdon v. Burrows, M.D. (4 C. & P. 210) that a medical man is not warranted, nierelv on statements made to him by the relations of a person sup- posed to be insane, in sending men to take him into custody and confine him, unless he is satisfied from those statements that such a step is necessary to prevent the lunatic from doing some immediate injury to himself or others. Lord Tenterden, C.J., observed : — " From the statement made by Dr. Burrows, when the parties were before the magistrate, it seems that it is usual, on the application of the family, to act in this manner. I confess I am sorry to hear it so said, for it certainly is not right ; and although there may be difficulty in getting access to a party labouring under insanity, yet the proper course is, if access cannot be obtained, to apply to the high authority which has cognizance over such matters, to get the party taken up, in order that he may be examined." This case occurred in November, 1829. Symm v. Fraser and another, 3 F, & F. 859, is on the other hand a very recent case. It v/as an action brought in the year 1863 against two medical men for having imprisoned the plaintiff and put her under bodily restraint under the false and unfounded pretence that she was a person of unsound mind, incapable of taking care of herself, and unfit to be at liberty, &c. The defence was that she was suffering from a fit of delirium tremens caused by drink. Dr. Tunstall, a physician, in the course of his evidence stated, that he never knew an instance of an habitual drinker, with a habit of delirium tremens, ever getting over it, because tlie habit of drinking was so strong on such persons that they could not abstain PERSONS OF UNSOUxVD MIND. 113 from drink. The witness said, delusions of the senses were symp- toms of delirium tremens. Both defendants were called as wit- nesses to sustain the defence, and one of them, Mr. Andrews, the usual medical attendant of the plaintiff, was permitted to give his general opinion, as a scientific witness, although he was one of the defendants. At the close of the case, which lasted several days, Chief Jiistice Cockburn (to the jury). — "The case was one of great impor- tance, involving as it did the question how far medical men. acting honestly and to the best of their judgment for the good of their patients, were responsible ; and while on the one hand, tlie jury ought jealously to watch over and uphold the per- sonal liberty of the individual, yet on the other hand they ought to be equally careful not to impair the efficacy of medical assistance by exposing medical practitioners to be harassed by vexatious actions No doubt the power which the law gave to medical men in these cases might be, and in rare instances had been abused, for interested purposes ; but these instances were so rare that he hoped the public might continue to repose that con- fidence in the members of this noble profession which had hitherto been reposed in them, and he believed was deserved There had been some restraint, no doubt, upon natural liberty, but was it not necessary ? Let the jury put themselves in the position of these gentlemen, or the friends and relatives of the plaiiitilf, and let them ask whether, even supposing that the defendants were responsible for all that had been done to prevent her from getting out into the street, or throwing herself out of the window, the jury would not consider that these gentlemen, so far from being proper subjects of condemnation and of censure, were not rather fit objects of gratitude and regard ?" In conclusion, the Lord Chief Justice desired them to consider the case, " not only with reference to the interests of the indi- viduals committed to the care of medical men, but also with a view to the interests of the public, taking care not to impair or neutralize the energy and usefulness of medical assistance by ex- posing medical men unjustly to vexatious and harassing actions." Verdict for the defendants. This verdict gave universal satisfaction both to the legal pro- fession and the public. Not long after, a somewhat similar case was tried in another court, and with a similar result. The Lord Chief Justice, in effect, directed the jury that if the restraint exer- cised, under the sanction, and even directions of the defendants, was no greater degree of restraint than was medically necessary, they were legally justified. The case is the exact converse of Hall v. Semple, vide ante. I 114 CHAPTEE XII. COBONEES' INQUESTS. As the office of Coroner is not only not necessarily a medical one, but not even a medico-legal one ; indeed, as it is not necessary in point of law that a coroner should be either a lawyer or a doctor, his sole legal qualification for the office being that of a freeholder, it might at first sight appear that the duties, like the qualification of such an officer, were scarcely a subject within the province of thiswork. But when it is considered that although in theory tlie coroner is neither a medical nor a legal professional, yet that in practice he is required to be versed in both medical and legal science, it will no longer be thought that either he or his duties are not fitting topics to be dis- cussed in a work on the Laws relating to the Medical Profession. It is not proposed, however, to take otherwise than a practical view of this subject, and therefore it will not be desirable to trace the origin, or descant upon the antiquity of the office — to assert its dignity by reminding the reader that the Lord Chief Justice of the Court of Queen's Bench is by virtue of his office supreme Coroner over all England, and the Puisne Judges of that Court are also Sovereign Coroners^ or by showing that originally the qualification for the office was that of knighthood, which qualification was defined by statute so early as 3 Edw. I., e. 10, thus, " of the most wise and discreet knights, which know, will, and may best attend upon such offices ;" or to lament that in consequence of a deficiency of knights it was at length enacted by 28 Edw. III., c. 6, that coroners should be elected of " the most meet and lawful people that shall be found in the said counties to execute the said office." ISTo precise amount of estate is defined by the statute 14 Edw. III., s. 1, c. 8, which enacts " that no coroner be chosen unless he have land in fee sufficient in the same county, whereof he may answer to all manner of people," but it was evidently intended that he should be a person of sufficient property to maintain the dignity of his office, and to answer any fine that might be set upon him for misbehaviour, although for the office of coroner of a borough no qualification by estate, residence, or otherwise is required ; and perhaps, after aU, the qualification by title or estate is the least important qualifica- tion for the office : for although in the present day we may look in coroners' inquests. 115 vain among coroners for tlie individual who, in the language of Chaucer, was " Lord and sire, Pull oftcntime was knight of the shire, A shreve had been, and Coronour," yet we may hope to recognise him in the descriptive qualities which Sir Edward Coke considers should distinguish the ofBce. A coroner, according to him, should be j^rohus liomo ; legalis homo ; of sufficient knowledge and understanding ; of good ability and power to execute •Jiis office according to his knowledge ; and, lastly, of diligence and attendance for the due execution of his office. And this for three purposes. I. The law presumes that he will do his duty, and not offend the law, at least for fear of punishment, whereunto his lands and goods are subject. II. That he be able to answer the king all such fines and duties as belong to him, and to discharge the county thereof. And, lastly, that he may execute his office without bribery. And these three properties are necessary to every officer. As by the term legalis homo, Sir Edward Coke, speaking as a lawyer, could not have meant literally a member of the legal pro- fession, such requirement forming no part of the legal qualification of a coroner, he probably intended to indicate a person of a Judicial mind, and such is doubtless, at the present day, the fittest qualifica- tion for the office, and together with that of probus Jiomo should be esteemed the choicest attribute of an officer of justice, especially of one who derives his very name, de corona, from the Crown itself, having cognizance of those pleas, emphatically styled plavita coronce. But whatever spell may attach to a name, for it is' doubtful, speaking poetically, whether " a rose by any other name would smell as sweet," romance and imagination having much to do with the appreciation of the senses, it is certain that this office is one of great antiquity ; for not only is the coroner spoken of in the reign of Henry II. as Servicus regis and coronarius ; in the reign of Richard I. as cusios placitorum Coronce, and in Magna Charta and subsequent statutes as Coronator ; but he is mentioned in the charter granted by Kino- Athelstane to the Monastery of St. John of Beverley, a.d. 925. As, however, was said before, it is not intended in this treatise to deal with this functionary or his duties, otherwise than in a practical way as affecting the medical profession especially ; but that course of dealing will not extend to an analysis of the judicial functions of a public officer, but will be confined to the duties of medical practi- tioners who may be summoned to this as to any other court of justice. By the 6 & 7 "Wm. lY., c. 89, s. 1, power is given to the coroner to direct the performance of a post-mortem examination, with or l2 116 coroners' inquests. without an analysis of the contents of the stomach or intestines of a deceased, by the medical witness or witnesses summoned to attend the inquest, provided that if any person shall state upon oath before the coroner that in his or her belief the death of the deceased was caused partly or entirely by the improper or negligent treatment of any medical practitioner or other person, such medical practitioner or other person shall not be allowed to perform or assist at the post-mortem examination of the deceased. And it may here be remarked that by the 29 & 30 Vict., c. 90 (Sanitary Act, 1866), s. 28, any "nuisance authority" (therein defined) shall have power to provide places for the reception of dead bodies during the tim^; required for post-mortem examinations, otherwise than at a mor- tuary bouse or workhouse. In all cases of sudden or violent death a medical man should be examined as a witness, and by the 3rd section of the first-named Act every legally qualified medical practitioner is entitled to a fee of one guinea for attending to give evidence at any coroner's in- quest whereat no post-mortem examination has been made by such practitioner. And for the making a post-mortem examination, either with or without an analysis of the contents of the stomach or intestines, and for attending to give evidence thereon, the fee or remuneration shall be two guineas, and the 1 Vict., c. 68, s. 2, directs that " the coroner shall, immediately after the termination of the proceedings at any inquest, advance and pay such remunera- tion or fee to every medical witness summoned under the provisions of the said Act, and the amount thereof shall be repaid to the said coroner in manner thereinafter mentioned.'' By the 6th section — " where any order for the attendance of any medical practitioner shall have been personally served upon him, or where any such order not personally served shall have been re- ceived by any medical practitioner in sufficient time for him to have obeyed such order, or where any such order has been served at the residence of any medical practitioner, and in every case where any medical practitioner has not obeyed such order, he shall for such neglect or disobedience forfeit the sum of 51. And the 5th section exempts from the operation of the Act inquests held on the bodies of persons dying in any public hospital or infirmary, or in any building or place belonging thereto, or dying in any county or other lunatic asylum, or in any public infirmary or other medical institution, whether supported by endowments or by voluntary subscriptions : and declares that in such case the medical officer whose duty it may have been to attend the deceased as such medical officer shall not be entitled to any fee or remuneration. The evidence of medical witnesses upon coroners' inquests is fre- quently all-important. JS'ot only in cases of palpable violence are CORONERS^ INQUESTS. 117 they required to explain the nature of the injuries inflicted on the deceased, but sometimes upon their evidence depends the solution of the problem whether the deceased died by his own hand or by that of another. By the post-mortem examination the presence of poison is perhaps discovered by the aid of chemical tests, no matter with what subtlety the agent poison may have been disguised, or however evanescent may have been its operation. Also in a charge of child- murder almost everything depends upon the evidence of the medical witness, the fact of whether the child was born alive, and had an exis- tence separate from its mother, being essential to constitute the crime of murder, otherwise it in all probability resolves itself into a case of concealment of birth only, which at once ousts the coroner of his jurisdiction. The inquest of the coroner is an inquest to ascertain the cause of death, with which the concealment of the birth has no connexion. The first question, therefore, which presents itself is, whether the child was born alive. As a test of this, it was formerly usual to immerse the lungs in water, it being supposed that if they floated the child must have respired. But this test is now quite exploded ; for it is obvious that if the child made but one gasp and instantly died, the luugs would swim in the water as readily as if the child had breathed for a lengthened time ; and it is not uncom- mon for an infant to breathe as soon as its head is protruded from the mother, although it may die the next moment. Air may pass into the lungs by inflation, or may be generated by putrefaction, and both will produce the same effect. The question of course is less difiicult in cases of immature birth, especially under the fifth month, in which case no foetus can be born alive ; and even from the fifth to the seventh the presumption either that the child was not born alive, or almost immediately ceased, from natural causes, to maintain an existence, would probably be in fiwour of the sus- pected person. But yet such serious cases should not be determined by the rules of presumption, but by facts proved and explained. The real question is the cause of death. Now, the child may die in the womb, during the labour, by pressure, or by strangulation from the umbilical cord, in which latter case especially the body presents appearances which to a common observer would seem to be the marks of a violent death. To kill a child in its mother's womb is no murder, because, as Sir E. Coke says, the person killed must be " a reasonable creatm-e in being, and under the King's peace." (3 Inst.) To constitute murder it must be proved that the entire child was actually born into the world in a living state (B. v. Poulton, 5 C. & P. 329) ; and the fact of its having breathed is not conclusive proof thereof (R. v. Sellis, 1 ISrood. C. C. 850 ; E. v. Crutchley, 7 C. ct P. 814). There must be an independent circulation in the child before 118 coroners' inquests. it can be accounted alive (E. v. Enoch, 5 C. & P. 539 ; E. v. Wright, 9 C. & P. 754). But the fact of the child's being still connected with the mother by the umbilical cord will not prevent the killing from being murder (E. v. Crutcbley, sujyra ; E. v. Eewes, 9 C. & P. 25 ; E. V. Trilloe, 2 Mood. C. C. 260). But the child, though safely born, may still be so weak as to die, and yet without any criminal act on the part of the mother, or the child may be suffocated by being left upon its face. These and a variety of other causes may contribute to the death of new born infants, particularly where the mother is delivered in secret by herself, and, either from exhaustion or unconsciousness, inflicts an unintentional injury upon the child. But of all the forms of murder, that by poison is the most detestable and the most difficult to guard against, and the detection of this secret and subtle agent frequently requires much chemical knowledge and delicate manipulation, and the perfect cleanliness of the apparatus used in the analysis. The medical practitioner, perhaps the medical attendant of the deceased, supposing the case to be one of suspected poisoning, may be able to produce most valuable corroborative or confirmatory evidence through having noted many circumstances in the course of his attendance upon the deceased. Indeed, many valuable suggestions may proceed from him, as, for instance, even upon a post-mortem examination no poison may be found in the stomach, because it may have been vomited up ; the vomited matter may thus be procured. If none be procurable, other things impregnated with it, such as clothes, may be secured, or even a portion of deal flooring may be scraped or cut out and reserved for analysis. The vessel in which vomited matter has been contained will often furnish valuable evidence, since heavy mineral poisons fall to the bottom, adhere to the sides, or leave a sediment. Any suspected articles of food should be at once taken possession of and carefully sealed up in a clean glass vessel. In the event of the death of the patient (which event alone can bring the case before the coroner's court) the exact time of death should be noted down, the attitude and position of the body should be observed, any bottles, phials, or packets, should be collected together and preserved, and many other important but minute facts may thus bo observed and brought to bear on the subsequent investi- gation. But this, of course, is in a case of suspected poisoning where the suspicion was aroused during the life of the deceased. In other cases, the evidence probably is that which alone can be collected after death and sometimes after a long period has elapsed, and even, perhaps, after the exhumation of the body. Sudden death from natural causes might sometimes be mistaken for death by poison ; but one of the means for distinguishing death by nar- coroners' inquests. 119 cotic poisoning from that througli apoplexy or disease of the heart is the difference in the rapidity witlx which death takes place. The only commou poison likely to operate with equal rapidity is prmsic acid ; opium is much slower in its operation, but there is nothing to prevent arsenic destroying life in an hour. In the absence of finding the poison in the stomach, which, in the case of prussic acid, is not always possible, great care should be taken in such cases before an opinion is expressed as to the real cause of death ; at the same time, it is not necessary in order to cause death that prussic acid should be received into the stomach. A drop placed on the tongue might be sufficient, and a case is known to the author of this work of simple inhalation of the fume having a fatal effect. The gentleman who so destroyed himself, was, however, enabled hurriedly to leave the shop (a chemist's) where the occurrence took place, and, after walking into a neighbouring shop, to request that he might be accommodated with a chair, seated in which he died. This would appear scarcely credible, but these facts were adduced in evidence at the coroner's inquest on the body. He had obtained possession of the bottle containing the acid by announcing himself as a medical man, and asking for hydrocyanic acid of Scheele's strength, when, suddenly snatching the bottle containing it out of the hands of the chemist — between whom and himself the counter opposed a temporary barrier — he thus eff'ected his purpose. He was immediately followed, on his exit, by the chemist, who never lost sight of him ; but, had this occurred in private, his death would doubtless (could he have made away with the bottle, for which he had ample time,) have been attributed either to apoplexy or disease of the heart. Even the very faint smell of such a poison might have been lost before discovery. In such an event even medical science might be baffled, and a murderer, through thus administering a subtle poison, might escape. Such a case, therefore, suggests that perhaps the state of the brain or the lungs might disclose the true cause of death when the state of the stomach had failed so to do. Under the present law, regulating the sale of poisons, precisely similar cases, happily, are not likely to occur ; yet the subject of Coroners' Inquests cannot be brought to a close without some fur- ther observations on the point. The deceased in this last case was a gentleman of considerable position and eminence, and a very old friend of the author's family, but for obvious reasons the name cannot now be mentioned. The case seems to supply the hitherto lack of authenticated evidence of death caused by the vapour of prussic acid. Dr. Taylor in his work " On poisons in relation to medical jurisprudence," published in 1S48, says, " The vapour of anhydrous prussic acid, if respired, 120 coroners' inquests. would prove almost instantaneously mortal. Even the vapour of the diluted acid, accidentally respired, occasions very alarming symptoms." He then proceeds to give the particulars of a case as follows : — " A practitioner was showing to some friends the effects of Scheele's prussic acid on an animal, when, by accident, a quan- tity of the acid fell upon the dress of a lady who was standing before a fire. The poison was rapidly evaporated, and the lady was immediately seized with dizziness, stupor, inability to stand, and faintness. The pulse became feeble and irregular." (p. 645.) Eemedies being promptly resorted to, the lady happily recovered. " Mr. Nunneley's experiments on animals prove that the action of the acid upon the lungs, when air impregnated with the vapour is breathed, is not only rapid but certain in its effects, and it forms one of the easiest methods of exhibiting the poison — one which it would be very easy to employ, but after a few hours most difficult to detect, because the vapour, from its great diffusibility, is very soon dissipated." (Prov. Trans. N. S. III., 84.) " There can be no doubt," says Dr. Taylor, " that, like arsenic and all poisons, prussic acid acts much more speedily and powerfully when taken into the lungs as a vapour than when introduced into the stomach as a liquid," "lam not aware," he continues, " that there is any well-authenticated case of death having been caused by the vapour. The celebrated Seheele died suddenly while making his researches on this poison, and it is alleged that he was killed by respiring the vapour. The anhydrous acid was not known to Seheele ; this was prepared by GTay-Lussac in the early part of the present century." (p. 646.) The case of the lady, mentioned by Dr. Taylor, seems to confirm the author's impression of the facts he has narrated, the only difterence in the two cases being that between voluntary and determined and involuntary and accidental respiration of the vapour. It is of great importance when the life of a deceased happens to be insured to ascertain whether the act of poisoning was the result of accident or suicide. In the event of litigation ensuing respecting a policy of insurance in such a case, it may be too late to discover not only any trace of poison in the body but even any appearances betokening death by such means. A coroner's inquest held shortly after death frequently affords the only opportunity of discovering the truth — and yet even upon such occasions the fact of the deceased having possessed the power of volition or locomotion up to the moment of death is too frequently taken as proof that his death resulted from natural causes, such as epilepsy, apoplexy, or disease of the heart ; and yet this is one of the most important questions connected with death by prussic acid. No doubt a strong dose would take immediate effect and at once annihilate the sensorial functions. But what coroners' inquests. 121 about a small dose, or the mere inhalation, or respiration of the vapour ? Perhaps one of the moat extraordinary cases of loco- motion and volition is one related by Mr. Godfrey. A gentleman, after taking a sufiicieut quantity of prussic acid to destroy life, walked ten paces to the top of a flight of stairs, descended the stairs, seventeen in number, and went to a druggist's shop, at forty-five paces distance, where he had previously bought the poison, entered the shop, and said in his usual voice, " I want some more of that prussic acid." He lived from five to ten minutes after taking the poison. It has generally been supposed that in cases of slow death from a small dose of poison the body would be found convulsed, but this opinion is not borne out by facts. In the case just referred to, although it was a case of *7oif death, there were no convulsions, and, what is of further interest, there was no odour of prussic acid about the mouth, and the individual died in the presence of several medical men without any shriek or any symptom approaching to it. (Prov. Med. Jour., Sept. 25, 1S44.) ■ Dr. Taylor mentions a case communicated to him in May, 1850, by Mr. Peake, of IS'ewark. A man swallowed a large dose of prussic acid, and was afterwards observed walking and smoking his pipe. He was found dead in a privy very shortly afterwards ; but although the body was warm, the smell of tobacco smoke from the mouth completely overpowered and concealed the odour of prussic acid. On opening the body the odour of the acid was at once per- ceptible. (Taylor's Med. Jurisprudence, p. 174.) In such a case, had there been no knowledge or suspicion of the man's having taken poison, he might readily have been considered to have died from natural causes — probably from apoplexy, under the circumstances. On the other hand, it is sometimes too hastily concluded that acts which, after all, are but only indicative of this consciousness, volition, and locomotion, can only be accounted for upon the supposition that the poison was administered by some other than the deceased. In a case (Eex v. Freeman) tried at the Leicester Spring Assizes, 1829, reported in the Medical Gazette (vol. viii. p. 759), owing to the position of the body and other circumstances, it was inferred that the deceased could not have taken the poison herself. The opinion of four out of five medical witnesses was strongly against the possibility of the acts having been performed by the deceased. All the acts to which the opinion referred might be performed in from^t'^ to eight seconds. There are now numerous facts wliich show that the symptoms may be often protracted for several minutes. Fortunately the medical opinion was completely set aside by cir- cumstances, and an innoceut man, charged with murder, was thus saved from being the victim of medical opinion. " Strychnia. — The symptoms produced by strychnia very much 122 coroners' inquests. resemble those of tetanus, but in that disease they are more slowly formed, and can only be coincidentally connected with the taking of some kind of solid or liquid. Death is a much more rapid effect of the poison than of the disease as it is produced by natural causes. Medical men may, however, be easily deceived respecting the origin of the symptoms when the dose is small and frequently repeated." (Taylor on Poisons, p. 77G.) This poison has acquired of late years a sad notoriety. The rigidity which the body of a person poisoned by strychnia acquires soon after death is retained for a very con- siderable period. In the case of the unfortunate John Parsons Cook, who was poisoned by his medical friend William Palmer, this rigidity was observable after two months' interment. At this trial, emptiness of the heart was set down as an indication that strychnia was not the cause of death, and a theory of death from angina pectoris, or some "latent and undiscoverable disease of the nervous system," was set up. Even Dr. Letheby supported this view by swearing that he had destroyed " some dozens" of animals by strychnia, and the heart was always full. This, however, is not in accordance with experiments on the human body. " Out of ten inspections in poisoning by strychnia," says Dr. Taylor, " in human subjects, the heart has been found either empty or deficient of blood in six.'^ To these two other cases may be added, in which the cavities of this organ were found empty (see Gruy's Hospital Eeports, October, 1856, Poisoning by Strychnia). So much for " animal" experience, or the evidence of witnesses who rely upon what they have seen in animals in preference to facts derived from an actual examination of human bodies. On an average, in poisoning by strychnia, the symptoms appear in from five to twenty minutes. In two cases at least an hour has elapsed {Lancet, August 31, 1850 ; " On Poisoning by Strychnia," 1856, p. 139). The longest interval recorded is that of tioo hours and a half before the appearance of symptoms. (Poisoning by Strychnia, p. 42.) In a case which occurred to Drs. Lawrie and Cowan in June, 1853, an hour and a half elapsed. In the case of Cook the symptoms commenced in an hour and a quarter, and he died in twenty minutes ; and yet in spite of these facts an attempt was made by the medical witnesses in the defence of Palmer to prove that an interval of an hour and a quarter in the case of Cook rendered it impossible that the symptoms could have been caused by strychnia (Reg. v. Palmer, C. C. C, May, 1856). Such was the substance of the evidence given by Dr. Letheby and Mr. Nunnely, from their experiments upon animals. "Whilst giving these gentlemen full credit for their evidence as regards animals, such analogies, it is clear, can no longer be depended on. It is here as well to remark that, as has been before observed, as the symptoms produced by strychnia very much resemble those of coroners' inquests. 123 tetanus, so as to require much judgment and discernment on the part of a medical practitioner in detecting the dillerence, so great caution is necessary before such a practitioner pronounces an opinion as to the cause of a fatal attack of tetanus itself, whether the result of violence, or accident, or natural causes — such as exposure to cold and wet (Corraack's Monthly Journal, Dec, 1845, p. 902), "it being scarcely possible to distinguish, by the symptoms, tetanus from wounds from that which occurs spontaneously as a result of natural causes" (Taylor's Med. Jur., p. 333). Where tetanus proves fatal, and there is any particular wound or personal injury on the body, before connecting it with the wound or injury, it will be proper, says Dr. Taylor {ih. p. 335), to make the following inquiries: — 1. Whether there were any symptoms indicative of it before the maltreatment. 2. AVhether any probable cause could have inter- vened to produce it, between the time of its appearance and the time at which the violence was inflicted. 3. Whether the de- ceased ever rallied from the efiects of the violence. The time at which tetanus sets in from the effect of a wound is from about the third to the sixth day. A case occurred in St. Bartholomew's Hospital, in September, 1S53, which exemplified the necessity of making a rigorous inquiry into all such circumstances. A boy, aged fifteen, while quarrelling with another received a blow on the back from the other's fist, and this was followed by a kick, but not of a severe character. In about two hours he complained of stifluess about the jaw ; the stiftuess continued to increase, and the jaw became partially fixed. Spasms of the muscles of the back super- vened, and, in one word, there was confirmed tetanus. He died on the fourth day after receiving the blow. It turned out that, six days previously to the first appearance of the tetanic symptoms, the boy had accidentally driven a rusty nail into his foot, and that the suppurating wound resulting from this injury had only closed on the day on which the blow was inflicted, and there could be no doubt, from the whole of the circumstances, that this, and not the blow on the back, had been the cause of the fatal attack of tetanus. (See Lancet, Dec. 10, 1853, p. 550.) It is often the case that the science and skill of the medical practitioner, afterwards called as a witness, can alone distinguish the innocent from the guilty. A man may have received a wound, and yet that wound may not have been the cause of death, or have in any way accelerated it ; or a man may have received two wounds, one inflicted by himself and one by another person, and may certainly have died of one of them. It remains for the medical practitioner to determine which of the two was the cause of death. Arsenic. — The following case of poisoning by arsenic shows how even circumstantial evidence of guilt may, in reality, vindicate the 124 coroners' inquests. innocence of the accused, -when submitted to the opinion of an in- telligent medical witness. A woman, aged sixty-five, accused her husband, aged seventy, of having attempted to poison her. She handed to the authorities a vessel containing arsenic in coarse powder, and some food, which she stated had been prepared for her by her husband. On analysis the food was found to contain a liirge quantity of arsenic. Tlie husband was immediately committed to prison. The wife remained apparently quite well for eight days afterwards, no symptoms of poisoning having manifested themselves about her. She was then seized with a fit of nausea, and was guilty of many extravagant acts. She died the following day — i.e., nine days after she had accused her husband of having administered arsenic to her in her food. On a post-mortem examination it was evident that she had died from the eflfects of arsenic. The poison was found in large quantities in the alimentary canal, and there were the usual morbid changes in the stomach and intestines. The husband all along denied his guilt ; but yet that guilt, to all ap- pearance, rested upon the medical question, whether a large quantity of arsenic could be taken by a person and remain dormant in the system, without producing any of its usual effects, for the long period of eight days ? The witnesses answered the question in the negative. "While the prisoner was with his wife, she did not suflTer from the symptoms of poisoning, nor was there any proof that he had administered poison. When, however, he was in prison, she died from the effects of it. It was fortunate for the accused that during the whole eight days he could not even have been accessory to its administra- tion, and that the medical witnesses were versed in the properties and effects of the poison. The woman had doubtless, in her en- deavours to rid herself of her husband, tampered with herself, but overdid her part in her desire to get up a case against him. (An- nalcs d'Hygiene, 1836, ii. 391.) M. Easpail, who at least is a distinguished chemist, and a French savant, some years ago, when dealing with a famous poisoning case, in which the main evidence against the prisoner was that arsenic had been found in the stomach of the victim, startled all France by the doctrine that nature had spread arsenic through the human system, and that, unless found in considerable quantities, its presence in the stomach after death gave no proof of murder. Allowing for the grossest exaggeration in this opinion, it certainly has been a matter of controversy whether arsenic is a constituent part of human bones, and even of the muscular system ; and that it is found in the soil of cemeteries is an acknowledged fact. These scientific differences of opinion, and the admission that zinc and sulphuric acid as well as copper, used in experiments for the detec- coroners' inquests. 125 tion of arsenic, are far from being free from arsenic themselves, at least lead to the deduction that the metallic deposit may be ])roved to be arsenical, and yet the arsenic may not be derived from the suspected liquid, the subject of analyzation. Without venturing more than to counsel great caution in all cases in which the deposit obtained through experiments is but small, it may fairly be remarked that unless arsenious acid can also be ob- tained from the deposit there can be no certainty that the deposit itself is arsenical, and especially when the other symptoms are not unlike those of cholera. Antimony has been mistaken for arsenic, and as tartarized antimony and James's powder are frequently employed in medicine, and may exist in the stomach at the time of death, it is highly necessary to guard against such a serious fallacy. But if no arsenic be found in the stomach, and only a minute quantity in the tissues, without fully accepting even Orfila's opinion that arsenic exists as a natural constituent of bones, and, as he at one time alleged, of tissues, such conflicting opinions of scientific men of eminence^ even if now exploded, might well cause less distinguished practitioners to hesitate before committing them- selves to a decision as to the origin of the deposit involving the life or death of a fellow-creature. This, perhaps, may not be an inappropriate place for stating, once for all, that whether in civil or criminal cases, a witness is not bound to disclose matters which have come to his knowledge as a professional legal adviser ; but other professional persons, it is now considered, either medical or clerical, have no such privilege. It is now conceded that a Protestant clergyman not only may, but must, disclose what has been revealed to him as a matter of religious confession, and therefore, a fortiori, must a medical attendant reveal communications made to him. The office of Coroner does not determine by the demise of the sovereign (1 Lev. 120; 3 Salk. 100; Dyer, 165). He is chosen for life, but he may be removed by the ancient writ Be Coronatore exonerando, for a cause to be therein assigned (1 Bl. Com. 348 ; F. Nat. Brev. 163-4). It is unnecessary to particularize the causes which have from time to time been deemed sufficient to justify a coroner's removal under this writ, as now, by the 23 & 24 Yict., c. 116, s. 6, the Lord Chancellor is empowered, " if he shall think fit, to remove for inability or misbehaviour in his office," any exist- ing or future coroner. The only offices that disqualify for the appointment of Borough coroner are those of alderman or coun- cillor, the right of such appointment being vested in the council of every borough in England and Wales in which, under the provisions of the Municipal Corporation Act, (5 & 6 AVm. 4, c. 76,) a separate Court of Quarter Sessions is or shall be holden. 126 CHAPTER XIII. EEGISTEATIOlSr OF BIETHS, DEATHS, AND MAEETAGES. Althotigh the Act 6 & 7 "Wm, IV., c. 86, has no special reference to the medical profession, yet as, under it, medical practitioners are frequently appointed registrars, and as any one present at either the birth or the death of a person may be required under the provisions of the Act to perform certain duties which may be deemed of a public character, and as such, almost necessarily, de- volve on medical attendants more frequently than upon others, a brief allusion to this Act will probably not be considered altogether out of place, although its provisions must be already familiar to almost every family throughout the country. The Poor Law Guardians are by the Act empowered to appoint superintendent registrars and registrars for the different districts into which unions or parishes may be divided, and the clerk to the guardians, if he be qualified to the satisfaction of the Eegistrar- General, may if he please accept such office of superintendent registrar. And in the event of his refusal or disqualification, the guardians may appoint any other person with such qualifications as the Eegis- trar-General may declare to be necessary, one of which is residence within the district. The father or mother of any child born, or the occupier of any house or tenement in which any birth or death shall happen, -may within forty-two days after the day of such birth, or within five days after the day of such death, give notice of such to the registrar of the district ; and in case any new-born child, or any dead body shall be found exposed, the overseers of the poor in the former case, and the coroner in the latter case, shall give notice thereof, and of the place where such child or dead body was found, to the registrar. And the father or mother of every child born after the passing of the Act, or in case of the death, ill- ness, absence, or inability of the father and mother, the occupier of the house or tenement in which such child is born shall, within forty-two days after its birth, give information to the registrar, upon being requested so to do, to the best of their knowledge and belief, of the particulars required. But after the expiration of such forty-two days it is made unlawful for the registrar to register such birth, unless within six months from the date of the birth any REGISTRATION OF BIRTHS, DEATHS, AND MARRIAGES. 127 person present at the birth, or the father or guardian make a decla- ration of all the particulars required — in which case the registrar may, in the presence of the superintendent registrar, register such birth. The superintendent registrar, in such case, before whom the declaration is made, as w^ell as the registrar, shall si"-n the entry of birth, and unless the entry shall be so signed no register of births sliall be received as evidence of the birth of such child ; and every person who shall knowingly register or cause to be registered the birth of any child, otherwise than as directed, after the expira- tion of forty-two days from the day of its birth, shall forfeit 50/. And after six months from the birth of any child, except one born at sea, no registrar shall register such, nor shall any register to prove the birth of any such child, with the exception before-named, be given in evidence wherein it shall appear that six calendar months have intervened between the day of birth and that of regis- tration. Any one offending against this enactment shall also forfeit for such offence 501. If any child duly registered shall, within six months after such registration, have any name given it in Baptism, the person pro- curing such name to be given may, within seven days after such baptism, deliver to the registrar, or superintendent-registrar, a cer- tificate in the form of Schedule (G) signed by the minister who has baptized it, and upon the receipt of such the registrar, or superin- tendent-registrar, shall register that the child was baptized in such name, and shall certify upon the certificate the additional entry, and send the said certificate to the Eegistrar-General. In the case of a death, some person present at it, or in attendance during the last illness of the deceased, or in case of the death or default of such person, the occupier of the house or tenement, or if the occupier be the person deceased, some inmate of the house or tene- ment in which the death took place is required, within eight days after such death, to give information, upon being requested so to do, to the registrar, according to the best of his ability, of all par- ticulars touching the death of such person, except in the case of inquests, when the coroner's jury shall make the requisite inquiry, and the coroner shall inform the registrar of their finding and the registrar shall make the entry accordingly. And every registrar, immediately upon registering any death, or as soon as required, shall deliver to the undertaker, or any one having charge of the funeral of the deceased, a certificate, according to form of Schedule (E), of such registration, and the undertaker, or other person, shall deliver the same to the officiating minister • and if any body be buried without such certificate, the person burying, or performing any such funeral or religious service, shall forthwith give notice thereof to the registrar.^— Provided that a 128 REGISTRATION OF coroner in his discretion may order the burial before registration, and in such case shall give a cex'tificate of his order to the under- taker or person having charge of the funeral. And any one who shall bury, or perform any funeral or religious service for the burial of a dead body without receiving one or other such certi- ficate shall forfeit 101. Also any one wilfully making, or causing to be made, for the purpose of being inserted in any register of birth, death, or marriage, any false statement touching any of the particulars required to be registered, shall be deemed guilty of per- jury. And further, every registrar who shall refuse, or, without reasonable cause, omit to register any birth or death of which he shall have had due notice, and any person having the custody of the register-book, or certified copy of any part thereof, who shall carelessly injure, or allow to be injured the same, shall forfeit 501. for every such offence. And every person wilfally destroying or injuring or causing to be destroyed or injured any such register book or certified copy of any part thereof, or falsely counterfeiting or causing to be counterfeited any part of such, or who shall wilfully insert or cause to be inserted in any such book or certified copy of any part thereof, any false entry of any birth, death, or marriage, or shall wilfully give any false certificate, or shall certify any writing to be a copy or extract of any register book, knowing the same register to be false in any part, or shall forge or counterfeit the seal of the Eegister Ofiice, shall be guilty of felony. Penalties under this Act are recoverable before two justices of the peace of the locality, with power to levy them by distress and sale of goods ; and for want of such distress such justices may commit the offender to prison for one month, an appeal being given in all cases above 51. to the next General or Quarter Sessions, to be held not sooner than twelve days after such conviction, upon the usual written notice of appeal being served, together with the grounds of appeal, within three days after such conviction, and seven clear days before such Sessions, and the appellant entering into recogni- zances with two sureties to prosecute such appeal. Such are the requirements of the Act, at least as far as they even indirectly bear upou the Medical Profession. It may be added, that by 1 & 2 Vict., c. 49, the production of the certificate of any super- intendent registrar or registrar of births and deaths, attested by two credible witnesses, certifying that such is a true copy of the ret^ister book, or of the certificate of the Registrar- General under the seal of the Register Ofiice, is sufiicient evidence of the birth, death, or marriage of any nominee for enabling the Commissioners for the reduction of the National Debt to grant life annuities, accompanied with a declaration of the identity of such nominee ; BIRTHS, DEATHS, AND MARRIAGES. 129 and whenever any such certificate is produced of any other than the Eegistrar-General, a declaration must be annexed to it of the witnesses who attested its execution, or one of them, to be made before a magistrate of the place wherein the place of the birth, death, or marriage of the nominee shall he situate, setting forth that such witness or witnesses compared the copy of the register with the register itself, and that it is a true and literal copy thereof, and that he or they saw the registrar or superintendent registrar sign the certificate, and that the names of such witnesses are of their own handwriting. Suggestions as to the duties of officers to public institutions, whether those institutions have their head-quarters, like those of the Eegistrar-General in the metropolis, and themselves are distri- buted in local districts throughout the country, or whether they present the more tangible and corporeal form of prisons or work- houses, should rather come from those thus brought into practical working with such institutions than from those who can do little more than call attention to the requirements which the law exacts of its officers. "Whether as surgeon to a county or government prison, to a union workhouse, or in aiiy official medical capacity at an hospital, or as holding the appointment of public vaccinator, or even superintendent registrar or assistant registrar of births, deaths, and marriages (which latter, as before mentioned, are not neces- sarily medical appointments), any suggestions for practically and efficiently executing the duties of the office would assuredly present themselves to any well-regulated mind, attuned by good common sense, in a far more effective fomn than they could be stereotyped on paper by those who have had no experience of that force of cir- cumstances which creates the suggestions desired. There is no royal road to practical experience ; and however a young practitioner, and perhaps a still younger public officer, might desire directions or instructions by which to regulate his conduct, a determination efficiently to discharge his duty, and a zealous ambition to do witli his might whatever his hand has undertaken, no matter how humble or matter of routine may be the requirements, will readily supply the place of any leading-strings, in the shape of suggestions from others, which after all might turn out to be crude ; and, even though they bore the impress of originality, would perhaps be found more to be admired in theory than to be implicitly followed as a rule in practice. K 130 CHAPTER XIV. POOE-LAW LEGISLATION AS ArFECTING MEDICAL PBACTITIONEES. PATJPEE LUNATICS, INCLUDINa CRIMINALS AND PEISONEfiS TOE DEBT. Section I. PATJPEES IN WOEKHOUSES OE POOR LAW DISTETCTS. The only medical practitioners liable to be affected by Poor Law legislation are the medical officers appointed by the Poor Law Guardians of their respective unions, either to districts into which such unions are for this purpose divided, or to workhouses, or as public vaccinators ; and here it may be remarked that a medical officer of any such district or workhouse cannot, as a matter of right, claim to be appointed a public vaccinator, but, as a matter of practical convenience it has been found desirable, as the readiest mode of complying with the statutes, to confer the appointment on such medical officers. The salary, therefore, assigned as medical officer for the district or workhouse should have no reference to the remuneration which such officer is to receive as public vaccinator, if holding, or about to hold, that office ; for, although appointed to both offices by the same authorities, the appointments and remune- ration respectively are based upon two distinct contracts. It is desirable to bear this distinction in mind, as, in the event of having to sue for the recovery of either or both salaries, such distinction might become a matter of practical importance. The appointment of public vaccinator is made under a written contract between the guardians and a duly qualified medical practitioner, the form of such contract being furnished under a general order of the Poor Law Board, subject to such modifications as the guardians, with the approval of the Poor Law Board, may determine upon ; whereas, the appointment of medical officer to a district or workhouse under the Poor Law Amendment Act may be either by agreement between a medical practitioner and the guardians, written and under seal, in which case the remedy would be by action on the contract; POOR-LAW LEGISLATION. 131 or, if there is no such contract, but there has been an election, at such salary, or the Poor Law Board have fixed the same by order, the proper remedy is by mandamus from the Ct. Q. B, (Addison V. Mayor of Preston, 12 C. B. lOS ; and Smart v. West Ham Union, 10 Ech. E. 5G7 ; and 11 Ech. R. 867.) The salary is payable up to the date at which the medical officer ceases to hold office ; but if he be suspended by the Board of Guardians from the discharge of his duties, and is dismissed by the Poor Law Board without such suspension having been previously removed, he is only entitled to his salary up to the date of his suspension. (See Art. 173 and 175 of the Consolidated Order of the Poor Law Commissioners (24 July, 1847,) relating to the medical relief of the poor.) Although no attempt will be made in this work to unravel the intricacy of official regulations, or to elucidate the complex character of duties — perhaps at all times " hard to be " thoroughly " under- stood," more especially as red-tapeism is an inexorable taskmaster — a hint or two may yet be dropped, or a suggestion offered, which may save many an honestly-intentioned medical officer from falling into the meshes with which verbose or ambiguously worded Acts of Parliament, and sometimes even the more carefully drawn general orders of the Poor Law Board seem to environ them. For instance, by 9 & 10 Vict., c. 66, s. 6, " If any officer of any parish or union do, contrary to law, with intent to cause any poor person to become chargeable to any parish to which such person was not then charge- able, convey any poor person out of the parish for which such officer acts, or cause or procure any poor person to be so conveyed, or give directly or indirectly any money, relief, or assistance, or afford or procure to be afforded anj Jaciliti/ for such conveyance, or make any offer or promise, or use any threat to induce any poor person to depart from such parish, and if, in consequence of such conveyance or departure, any poor person become chargeable to anj' parish to ■which he was not then chargeable, such officer, on couviction thereof before any two justices, shall forfeit and pay for every such oflence any sum not exceeding 51., and not less than 21." Medical officers rendering assistance, though of a strictly pro- fessional character, as, for instance, administering stimulants or medical nutriment with a view to alleviate the fatigue of travelling, if done with the intent to assist in the conveyance or departure of such poor person out of the parish for which such officer acts, and if in consequence of such departure, so facilitated, such person be- comes chargeable to another parish, the medical officer so rendering assistance, even though dictated by humanity, is amenable uuder the above section, provided he was aware of the object of the poor- law officers in effecting the removal, viz., to cause such person to become chargeable to another parish to which he was not then k2 132 POOR-LAW LEGISLATION. chargeable. See "Walsh's " Poor-Law Medical Officers' YadeMecum," where an instance of such liability on the part of a medical officer is given, as having resulted in a conviction of the officer. The case thus referred to is as follows : — The medical officer of the Tadcaster Union was summoned, at eight o'clock on the morning of the day on which the offence is charged as having been committed, to attend a woman in labour at the Tadcaster railway station. Upon his arrival there, finding that another surgeon was in attendance, he withdrew, and heard no more of the case until one o'clock in the day, when, at the request of the overseer, he accompanied him and the assistant overseer to the railway station, where they found the woman sitting iu an arm-chair in the waiting-room. She was, under the circumstances, unusually strong and well. She had not been put to bed ; she herself stating, iu answer to inquiry, that she was very well as she was, and nothing had taken place since delivery to cause debility. She said she had walked from Leeds the day before, aud expressed a wish to return there, as she had at that place a home and a mother. The medical officer thereupon gave it as his opinion that she might, without risk, be permitted to return, pro- vided she were conveyed with all proper care, &c. The woman even offered to pay her own fare by train, and repeatedly expressed her wish to go home, thus disarming the medical officer of any suspicion that she would upou her arrival become chargeable to the towusliip of Leeds. The magistrates gave their decision in the following terms : — " This person, at the time of her affliction, was in a state of pauperism, and in her condition she ought to have been taken care of, till she was sufficiently recovered, by the officers of the place in which she was found. Instead of doing so, they assist her, and cause her to be removed to Leeds, where she had not before been chargeable, but immediately afterwards was so. This seems to us to have been the natural and inevitable consequence of the removal ; and we think the intent, as charged, has been proved against the defendants." The penalty inflicted was 5/^., or in de- fault seven days' imprisonment. In concluding this section of the chapter, it may be remarked that by section 2 of the 4 & 5 Vict., c. 32, (one of the Yaccinatioa Acts,) vaccination shall not be considered to be parochial relief, and that no persons availing themselves of it shall, by reason thereof, be deprived of any right or subjected to any disability. POOR-LAW LKGISLATION. ^2'. Sectiok II. PAT] PEE LUNATICS, INCLUDING CRIMINALS AND PRISONEES FOE DEBT, Medical certificate. — The form of tlie certificate is prescribed by the Act 16 & 17 Vict., c. 97, s. 67, and Schedule V, No. 3 (see Appendix). If given alone by the medical man who is called in, it is not conclusive, but if given by the medical officer, in addition to such medical man, the justice or ofBciating clergyman and relieving officer (or overseer) will have no alternative, and must make an order accordingly for the admission of the pauper into an asylum (s. 7, last proviso). The order, however, will not authorize the admission of the pauper after the lapse of seven clear days from the date of the certificate (s. 73). Where the certificate is signed by a medical man called in by a justice, the latter may order the guardians (or overseers) to pay a reasonable remuneration for the examination (s. 69). If any certificate be found incorrect, it may be amended within fourteen days after the pauper's admission, with the sanction of the Commissioners in Lunacy, who, if it be not amended, may discharge the pauper (16 & 17 Vict., c. 97, s. 87 ; 25 & 26 Vict., c. Ill, s. 27). By the 66th section of the former Act, " every pauper lunatic not in an asylum or an hospital regis- tered or a house licensed for the reception'' of lunatics" is to be personally visited once in every quarter of a year " by the medical officer of or for the parish or union, or district of a parish or union, in which such lunatic is resident," who is to make his report in the form prescribed, the object of such visitation being to show whether all pauper lunatics, not in confinement, " are or are not properly taken care of, and may or may not properly remain out of an asylum ;" and with respect to the lunatics in any workhouse, the medical officer as aforesaid is required, upon his quarterly visits of such inspection, to certify whether, in his opinion, the workhouse is or is not sufficient for the accommodation of the lunatics detained therein, and whether or not the lunatics so detained are proper persons to be kept in a workliouse (16 & 17 Vict., c. 97, s. Q^; 25 & 26 Vict., c. Ill, s. 21, and Schedule B). A special remunera- tion is assigned to the medical officer in respect of " each such quarterly visit to any pauper not being in a workhouse," and the forms are to be supplied to him by the guardians. On becoming aware that any pauper resident in his district is or is deemed to be a lunatic, and a proper person to be sent to an asylum, the medical officer is to give written notice thereof, within three days, to the relieving officer ; or if there be no relieving officer, 134 POOR-LAW LEGISLATION. to tlie overseers, subject to a penalty not exceeding 101. for neglect (16 & 17 Vict., c. 97, s. 67 & s. 70). Pauper lunatics wandering abroad and away from control may be dealt with in the same way as private lunatics, under 16 & 17 Vict., c. 97, s. 68. This enact- ment has been already adverted to in a former chapter. If an order be made for his admission into an asylum it must be in the form prescribed by the Act, (Schedule F, No. 1,) and will have the same eftect as an order made under s. 67. (The provisions of ss. 75, 76, and 122 will apply to the medical certificate required under s. 68.) A-uy two visitors, with the advice in writing of the medical officer of the asylum, may permit ant/ patient to be absent from the asylum on trial for such period as they may think fit, making an allowance to him ; the amount whereof is to be charged and paid as if he were in the asylum (16 & 17 Vict., c. 97, s. 79). If he do not return at the proper time he may be retaken within fourteen days afterwards, unless a medical certificate be sent to the visitors, certifying that his detention in an asylum is no longer necessary (s. 79). And by the same section any two of the visitors of a lunatic asylum, with the advice in writing of the medical officer of the asylum, may order the discharge of any pauper lunatic who has been received into such asylum. In the case of the death of a pauper lunatic in an asylum, a notice and statement of the death, in the prescribed form (Schedule F, No. 5), and the cause of death, and the names of any persons present at the death, must be drawn up and signed by the clerk and medical officer, and copies transmitted to the following persons : — 1. The Begistrar of Deaths for the District ; 2. The Commissioners in Lunacy, the relieving officer, or the overseers of the union or parish to which the deceased was chargeable. As to legal proceedings against the superintendent of a county asylum for furnishing a defective certificate of the cause of death, which omitted to mention the post-mortem examination, see Seventeenth Report of the Com- missioners, 1863, pp. 32-34. The Attorney-General v. Pearson (10 Jurist, 651), arose out of a case which occurred in the parish of Islington in 1842. James Elliot, an alleged lunatic, brought an action for assault and false imprisonment against the overseers, the relieving officer, the master of the workhouse, the medical officer, and a person named Beavan, which was tried before Ch. Justice Tiudal in the Court of Common Pleas, at Westminster, in May, 1844. The jury found a verdict for the plaintiff, with 400^. damages. A motion was after- wards made for a new trial (see 14 Law Jour. Eep. (N.S.) C. P., 136, and 1 C. B. E., 18), and by consent the Court reduced the damages to 200/., and a stet processus was entered in a second action POOR-LAW LEGISLATION. 135 which had been commenced. The medical officer (Semple) and Beavan suffered judgment to go by default. The damages and costs on both sides amounted to nearly 900?., and were paid by the trus- tees of the parish of Islington out of the rates ; and an informa- tion was filed by two ratepayers, seeking to charge the trustees personally with the payment of the amount. The Court (V.C. Kniglit Eruce) under all the circumstances of the case, and being of opinion that tlie facts were such as to justify the parish officers in interfering, dismissed the information with costs. This case is re- ferred to principally as an instance of the amount of litigation that may ensue through a mistake, partly that of the medical officer of the parish. As the Lord Chief Justice put it to the jury, the case resolved itself into whether " at the time of the committing of the trespasses the plaintiff was a dangerous lunatic and in a state of destitution.'' On the occasion of the motion for a new trial his lordsliip, whilst sug- gesting the above compromise by reducing the damages, said : — " The defendants stand wholly absolved from the suspicion of having acted from sinister or malignant motives. The most that can be said is, that they mistook their course." Up to the year 1808 the only enactments affecting pauper luna- tics were certain provisions in successive Vagrant Acts, which authorized the detention of dangerous lunatics, in chains, if necessary (i-ather with a view to the protection of the public than for their own benefit), and which provided for their removal to the parishes of their settlement, and the application of their property towards their maintenance. In the year 1808, however, the 48 Geo. III., c. 96, was passed, and laid the foundation of that system of providing public lunatic asylums at the expense of the respective counties and boroughs in England and Wales, which has since been gradually, though not yet completely, carried into effect. The scheme of this Act, in its general features, has been in the main adhered to in the subsequent legislation on this subject ; though improvements have been introduced from time to time. This Act, as also a subsequent Act (the 9 Geo. IV., c. 40), left it entirely at the option of the justices to provide asylums or not, as they might think proper ; but the 8 & 9 Vict., c. 12(5, introduced an important change upon this point, by rendering it incumbent upon the justices of every county and borough, not already provided with an asylum, to obtain one, either separately, or jointly with other counties and boroughs, and by empowering the Secretary of State, after the lapse of three years, to require the justices to take the necessary steps for that purpose, in every case in which they might then have omitted to do so. Notwithstanding this enactment, however, it appeared from the Seventh Annual Eeport of the 136 POOR-LAW LEGISLATION. Commissioners in Lunacy (1853), that in 1852 there were still several counties unprovided with asylums, and that there were only four boroughs which sepai'ately possessed one. Looking at this deficiency, and the importance of supplying it, the legislature, by the Act of 1853 (IG & 17 Vict., c. 97) made it compulsory upon the justices of every county not having an asylum to provide one forthwith, either by erecting or otlierwise providing an asylum for the county alone, or by uniting for that purpose with any county or counties, borough or boroughs ; and also (if deemed expedient) with the subscribers to any hospital for lunatics established, or in course of erection, or afterwards to be established ; but so that no agreement for this purpose should interfere with the reception of as many lunatics not paupers as might otherwise have been received into such hospital. The Act likewise imposed a similar obligation upon the justices (or council) of every borough not having an asylum, excepting any borough in which at the passing of the 8 & 9 Vict., c. 126, there were not six justices besides a recorder, (which boroughs, as well as cities, towns, or other districts, not being boroughs within the meaning of the Act, were to be an- nexed for the purposes of the Act to the adjacent counties) though it allowed such boroughs as might prefer this alternative, to con- tract for the reception of their lunatics into the asylums of other boroughs or counties ; and it further provided, that boroughs thus contributing to county asylums should be considered as possessing asylums. It is not necessary here to describe further the provisions of this Act, or to do more than state, that all necessary powers are conferred upon the justices for carrying the Act into effect, and for providing visitors to manage the asylum when provided. Such visitors may also enter into temporary contracts for sending pauper lunatics into the asylums of other counties or boroughs, or into registered hospitals or licensed houses, as well as for receiving pauper and other lunatics of other counties or boroughs into their asylums, where there is accommodation to spare. The proceedings are to be subject, in certain respects, to the supervision and con- trol of the Commissioners of Lunacy and the Secretary of State. By 16 & 17 Vict., c. 97, s. 72, no pauper shall be received into any asylum, registered hospital, or licensed house (save under the provisions with respect to removal), without an order according to the form required in Schedule (E), No. 1, signed by one justice, or an ofliciating clergyman, and one of the overseers or the relieving officer of the parish or union from which such pauper is sent, to- gether with a statement of particulars (see Schedule) and a medical certificate, according to the form in Schedule (E), No. 3, signed by one medical practitioner who shall have personally examined him POOR-LAW LEGISLATION. 137 not more than seven clear days previous to his reception : And every one receiving any pauper into any asylum without sucli order and certificate (save under auy of the said provisions) shall be guilty of a misdemeanour. As to the liabilities of persons signing the order, see Fletclier v. Fletcher, 1 E. & E. 420, L. J. E. (N. S.) Q. B. 131. But it is rather with persons signing the medical certificate that this treatise is concerned. The Commissioners in Lunacy, in a letter addressed to the Lord Chancellor on the 4th July, 1849, (which was printed by order of the House of Commons on 1st August, 1849 ; Sess. Papers, No. 620,) entered very fully into this important question. They said — " It is of vital importance that no mistake or miscon- ception should exist, and that every medical man who may be applied to for advice on the subject of lunacy, and every relative and friend of any lunatic, as well as every magistrate and parish officer (each of whom may be called upon to act in cases of tliis sort) should know, and be well assured that, according to law, any person of unsound mind, whether he be pronounced dangerous or not, may legally and properly be placed in a county asylum, lunatic hospital, or licensed house, on the authority of the preliminary order and certificate prescribed by the Acts." "With respect to resorting to a Commission of Lunacy, the Commissioners added — " It is obvious that the finding of a jury is in no case essential, in order legally to justify the coufiuement of a person of unsouud mind." (See also the Fourth Annual lleport of the Commissioners, 30th June, 1849, p. 10 ; and Fifth Eeport, 30th June, 1850, p. 14.) At common law the power of restraining and confining a lunatic is limited to cases in which it would be dangerous, either as regards others or himself, for the lunatic to be at large, and though the powers given under the Lunacy Acts are not so limited, it is im- portant that the provisions of those Acts should be strictly observed. By the 5 & Vict., c. 22, it was enacted, that if auy prisoner confined in tlie Queen's Prison should, become insane, it should be lawful for one of the principal Secretaries of State, upon the certificate of two physicians or surgeons to that etfect, to remove him to Bethlehem Hospital, there to remain until it shall be duly certified by two physicians or surgeons that such prisoner had become of sound mind, whereupon the Secretary of State might order him to be re-delivered into the custody of the keeper of the Queen's Prison. Under this enactment a prisoner for debt might, upon becoming insane, be thus removed. (Gore v. Sir George Grey and others, 9 Jurist (N. S.) 752.) — Such judgment aflirmed in the Exch. Chamber, 33 L. J. E. (N. S.) C. P. 109, but the Queeu's Prison no longer exists as a debtors' pi'ison. Similar Acts have been passed 138 POOR-LAW LEGISLATION. having reference to convict prisons alone — as, for instance, 5 & 6 Vict., c. 29 (Peutonville), by whicli any convict may, upon being reported insane by the Commissioners for governing the prison, be sent by order of the Secretary of State to such lunatic asylum as the Secretary of State shall direct, there to remain until it be cer- tified by two physicians or surgeons that he has become sane, whereupon, if his time of imprisonment shall not have expired, he shall be remanded to Peutonville. A similar Act was passed with respect to Millbank, (6 & 7 Yict., c. 26,) with the exception that the prisoner must not only be reported by the Inspectors of the prison as insane, but must be found to be so upon the certificates of two physicians or surgeons. By 23 & 24 Vict., c. 75, entitled an Act to make better pro- vision for the custody and care of Criminal Lunatics (6th August, 1860), under section 14 — " Two or more of the Commissioners in Lunacy, one at least of whom shall be a physician or surgeon, and one at least a barrister, shall, once or oftener in each year, on such day or days, and at such hours of the day, and for such length of time as they think fit, and also at any time when directed by the Secretary of State, visit every asylum for criminal lunatics, and shall inquire as to the condition, as well mental as bodily, of the persons confined therein, or any of them, and shall also make such other inquiries as to such asylum as to them may seem proper, or as such Secretary of State may direct." And by the 15th section the Commissioners are directed in the month of March in every year, to report to one of the prin- cipal Secretaries of State the visits made as aforesaid in the pre- ceding year, with such particulars as they may think deserving of notice. SCHEDTJLE (A) OP THE AcT. Statement respecting Criminal Lunatics to ie filled up and trans- mitted to the Medical Superintendent with every criminal lunatic. Name. Age. Date of Admission. Former Occupation. From whence brought. Married, Single, or Widowed. How many Children. Age of Youngest. Whether first attack. When previous attacks occurred. POOR-LAW LEGISLATION. 139 Duration of existing attack. State of bodily health. Whether suicidal, or dangerous to others. Supposed cause. Chief delusions or indications of Insanity. Whether subject to Epilepsy. Whether of temperate habits. Degree of Education. Eeligious persuasion. Crime. Where and when tried. Verdict of Jury. Sentence. Such are the particulars required to be embodied in every certifi- cate, duly filled up and authenticated, to be transmitted with every person whom the Secretary of State may direct, under the pro- visions of this Act, to be removed to any asylum for crimiuul lunatics. By the 24 & 25 Yict., c. 134 (entitled an Act to amend the Law relating to Bankruptcy and Insolvency in England, 1861), "if any person being or alleged to be of unsound mind shall be in prison for debt, the gaoler shall forthwith require a justice of the peace for the county or place to visit such debtor, and inquire into his state of mind ; and such justice shall call to his assistance two duly qualified medical practitioners, each of whom shall be a physician, surgeon, or apothecaiy, and each of whom shall separately examine such debtor, and if such two medical practitioners shall each sign a certificate with respect to such debtor, according to the form in Schedule H, and the justice be also satisfied from his own view that such debtor is of unsound mind, he shall certify the same to the proper Court, and thereupon the Court may appoint some one to represent such debtor, and direct such proceedings to be taken for adjudication in Bankruptcy against him as the Court shall think fit. And such prisoner may thereupon be removed to the county asylum as a lunatic. Such prisoner to be dealt with in all respects as a pauper lunatic, and in the event of his recovery shall, if still liable to be detained in custody as a debtor, be remitted to the gaol from whence he was received." Schedule (H) eefeered to. JEbrm of Medical Certificate. I, tbe undersigned, being a {here set forth the 140 POOR-LAW LEGISLATION, qnaliji cation entitling the •person to 'practise as a pliysician, surgeon, or apothecary, ex.gra.. Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians in London, Licentiate of the Apothecaries Company, or as the case may he), and being in actual practice as (Physician, Surgeon, or Apothecary, as the case may he), hereby certify that I, on the day of , at the G-aol of , at , in the county of , separately from any other medical prac- titioner, personally examined , a prisoner for debt iu the same gaol, and that the said is a (lunatic, or an idiot, or a person of unsound mind), and a proper person to be taken charge of and detained under care and treatment, and that I have formed this opinion upon the following grounds, viz, : — 1, Facts indicating insanity observed by myself (Jiere state the facts) . 2. Other facts (if any) indicating insanity communicated to me by others (here state the information and from whom). (Signed) Name, Place of abode. Dated this day of , one thousand eight hundred and This Act is still referred to and the form of certificate given, because although imprisonment for debt is commonly said to have been abolished by the recent Bankruptcy Bill, debtors may still be committed to prison under certain circumstances, which it is not necessary to enumerate here, by order of the Court or of a Judge, and whether they should be said to be committed for contempt of Court in not obeying its judgment or order to pay the debt, or for the debt itself, they would probably still come under the definition of " prisoners for debt," and if insane would have to be removed to a lunatic asylum. But even should a short Act be required to facilitate that object, doubtless the same form of medical certificate would be annexed to it. By the 27 & 28 Vict., e, 29 (entitled, an Act to amend the Act 3 & 4 Vict., c, 54, for making further provision for the confinement and maintenance of insane prisoners,) (23 June, 1864), which was passed in consequence of the proceedings which occurred in the case of Townley, mentioned in a previous part of this work, the first section of 3 & 4 Vict., c, 54, is repealed, and other pi'ovisions are made enabling the Secretary of State to remove insane prisoners, confined under any other than civil process, from prison to a lunatic asylum, under certain circumstances and conditions. This Act also transfers the charge of the maintenance of such prisoners POOR-LAW LEGISLATION. 141 from the parish of the settlement to the common fund of the •union. (S. 5.) The 3 & 4 Vict., c. 54, did, and the 27 & 28 A^ict., c. 29, does, empower the Secretary of State to remove the insane prisoners to such county lunatic asylum or other proper receptacle as he may judge and appoint ; and, with reference to 39 & 40 Greo. III., c. 94, and 3 & 4 Vict., c. 54, the Metropolitan Commissioners in Lunacy, in their general report of 1811 (p. 198), stated as follows: — "It has been assumed in pi'actice, that the Acts above cited are compulsory upon the visitors of county asylums, and that they cannot refuse to receive persons committed under lloyai warrant." By the second section, the justices therein described are empowered and required in the case of all prisoners under any sentence short of death, or under any charge, or for want of finding sureties for good behaviour, or in consequence of any summary conviction, to call to their assistance two physicians or surgeons, or one physician and one surgeon, duly registered as such respectively under the provisions of the Medical Act (1858), and to be selected by them for that purpose, and to inquire with their aid as to the insanity of such person ; and, if it be duly certified by such justices and such medical practitioners as aforesaid that such person is insane, the Secretary of State may, upon receipt of such certificate, if he shall think fit, direct the removal of such person to a lunatic asylum : and in the case of a prisoner under sentence of death, if there is good reason to believe that he is insane, and such shall be made to appear to the Secretary of State either by means of a certificate in writing to that efiect in the form given in Schedule A, transmitted to him by two or more of the visiting justices, or by any other means whatsoever, such Secretary of State shall appoint two or more physicians or surgeons duly registered as aforesaid to inquire into the insanity of such prisoner, and, upon receipt of a certificate in writing to that efiect, signed by such persons, the Secretary of State may order the removal of the prisoner to a lunatic asylum, there to be detained until it be duly certified to the Secretary of State by two physicians or surgeons, or one physician and one surgeon duly registered as aforesaid, that such person is sane, in which case he shall be removed back to prison to undergo his sen- tence of death. SCHEBULE (A) EEFEEEED TO. We being visiting justices of hereby certify under our hands that we believe a prisoner iu the said prison under sen- tence of death to be now insane. 142 POOE-LAW LEGISLATION. By 27 & 28 Vict,, c. 119, s. 75, entitled, an Act to make provi- sions for the discipline of the Navy (29 July, 1864), if any person imprisoned by virtue of that Act shall become insane, and a certificate to that effect shall be given by two physicians or surgeons, the Admiralty shall direct the removal of such person to a lunatic asylum ; and, if such person in the same manner be certified to be again of sound mind, the Admiralty may order him to be removed back to prison to undergo the remainder of his sentence, if unexpired. 143 CHAPTEE XV. CHEMISTS, DEFGGISTS, AND DENTISTS. Section I. CHEMISTS AND DEUGGTST8. As the Pharmacy Acts (15 & 16 Vict., c. 56 ; 31 & 32 Vict., c. 121 ; and 33 Vict., c. 117,) liave given a Parliamentary recognition to chemists and druggists, by requiring their registration as such, it is necessary here to refer to them. The first of these Acts (1852) enacts, in section 6, that " all such persons as shall at the time of the passing of this Act be members, associates, apprentices, or students of the Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain (incorpo- rated by charter, 18th Feb., 1813), according to the terms of the said charter, shall be registered as pharmaceutical chemists, assistants and apprentices, or students, respectively." And by section 8 the examiners appointed under the said charter are empowered to " examine all persons who shall present themselves for examination, in their knowledge of the Latin language, in botany, and in materia medica, and in pharmaceutical and general chemistry, and such other subjects as may from time to time be determined by any bye-law: provided that such examination shall not include the theory and practice of medicine, surgery, or midwifery." Such examiners may grant or refuse certificates of competent skill, knowledge, and qualifications to exercise the calling of pharma- ceutical cheaiists, or to be engaged or employed as students, apprentices or assistants respectively. The amended Act of 1868 (31 & 32 Vict., c. 121,) enacts that from and after the 31st De- cember, 1868, it shall be unlawful for any person to sell or keep open shop for retailing, dispensing, or compoundiug poisons, or to assume or use the title " cliemist and druggist," or chemist, or druggist, or pharmacist, or dispensing chemist or druggist, iu any part of Great Britain, unless such person shall be a pharmaceutical chemist, or a chemist and druggist, within the meaning of that Act, and be registered under the Act, and conform to such regulatious as to the keeping, dispensing and selling of such poisons as the ]44 CHEMISTS AND DRUGGISTS. Pharmaceutical Society may from time to time prescribe with the consent of the Privy Council. The 3rd section defines chemists and druggists to consist of a,ll persons who at any time before the passing of the Act have carried on in Great Britain the business of a chemist and druggist, in the keeping of open shop for the com- pounding of the prescriptions of duly qualified medical practitioners, also of assistants and associates who before the passing of the Act shall have been duly registered under the existing Pharmacy Act (15 & 16 A^ict., c. 56,) and all such as may be duly registered under this Act ;" the qualifications for such latter registration to consist of being twenty-one years of age, and having been for the three years im- mediately preceding the passing of the Act of 1868 employed in the occupation of an assistant to a pharmaceutical chemist, or a chemist and druggist, and having passed a modified examination to the satisfaction of the Pharmaceutical Society established by the Act of 1852, confirming their charter dated February 18, 1843. Pharma- ceutical chemists, under the Act of 1852, and existing chemists and druggists, as before defined, shall be entitled to be registered without fee, upon a declaration duly certified as therein mentioned. And any one contravening the provisions of this Act shall for every such offence forfeit the penalty of 51. And by the 16th sec. nothing contained in this Act shall interfere with the business of a legally qualified apothecary. By 32 & 33 Vict., c. 117, nothing contained in the first 15 sections of the Act of 1868 shall affect any person registered as a legally qualified medical practitioner before the passing of the Act of 1869, and the said clauses shall not apply to any person who may hereafter be registered as a legally qualified practitioner, and who in order to obtain his diploma for registration shall have passed an examination in pharmacy. And it is further provided by the original Act (s. 11) that no member of the medical profession, or who is practising under the right of a degree of any University, or under a diploma, or license of a medical or surgical corporate body, is to be registered ; and if any registered pharma- ceutical chemist obtains such diploma, his name is not to be retained on the register. And by the Act (1868) it is further enacted, as in the Medical Act, that every registrar of deaths on receiving notice of the death of any pharmaceutical chemist shall give the requisite information of such death to the proper authorities men- tioned in the Act, that the name of the deceased may be erased from the register. It is almost needless to add, although it is ex- pressly provided, that registration under either of the Pharmacy Acta does not entitle any one so registered to practise medicine or surgery, or any branch of medicine or surgery (31 & 32 Vict., c. 121, s. 18). Thus it is seen that henceforth the business of a chemist and CHEMISTS AND DRUGGISTS. 145 drug<:;ist is clearly defined. He may make up prescriptions of duly qualified medical practitioners, compound and dispense medicines, but in no case prescribe or practise medicine, surgery, or any branch of medicine or surgery, under penalties. He is in no sense a member of the profession, and it would therefore be inconsistent with the character of the present work to occupy more of its pages with further remarks on this topic, beyond a i'ew observations on the subject of " poisons" and the Pharmacopoeia. The list of poisous is contained in Schedule A of the Act. By the 17th sec. it is enacted that " it shall be unlawful to sell any poison by wholesale or by retail unless the box, bottle, vessel, wrapper, or cover in which such poison is contained be distinctly labelled with the name of the article and the word Poison, and with the name and address of the seller of the poison, and it shall be unlawful to sell any poison of those which are in the first part of Schedule A to this Act, or may hereafter be added thereto, to any person unknown to the seller, unless introduced by some person known to the seller ; and the seller before delivery shall cause to be made an entry in a book in the form set down in Schedule F, the date of the sale, the name and address of the purchaser, the name and quality of the article sold, and the purpose for which it is stated by the purchaser to be required, signed by the purchaser and by the person, if any, who introduced him." Any infringement of this enactment renders the seller " liable, upon summary conviction, to a penalty of 51. for the first offence, and 10/. for the second or any subsequent oifence, and the person on whose behalf any sale is made by an apprentice or servaiit shall be deemed to be the seller.'' The provisions of this section are not to apply to articles to be exported from Great Britain by wholesale dealers, nor to sales by wholesale to retail dealers in the ordiunry course of business, nor shall any of the pro- visions of this Act apply to any medicine supplied by a legally qualified apothecary to his patient, nor to any article when forming part of the ingredients of any medicine dispensed by a person regis- tered under this Act, provided the medicine be duly labelled with the name and address of the seller, and the ingredient thereof entered, with the name of the person to whom it is sold or delivered, in a book kept for that purpose." And by the 3rd section of the amended iVet of 1S68, " nothing contained in section 17 of the former Act shall ap[)ly to any legally qualified medical practitioner, provided any medicine supplied by him be distinctly labelled with the name and address of the seller, and the ingredients be entered, with the name of the person to whom it is sold or delivered, in a book to be kept for that purpose." Unfortunately the Act of 18G8 contains an exception in favour of " the making or dealing in patent medicines." This is its one great blot. 1 J 46 DENTISTS. By section 54 of 21 & 22 Vict., c. 90, the " Medical Council shall cause to be published under their direction a book containing a list of medicines and compounds, aud the manner of preparing them, together with the true weights and measures, by which they are to be prepared and mixed, and containing such other matter and things relating thereto as the General Council shall think fit, to be called " British Pharmacopoeia," and the General Council shall cause to be altered, amended, and republished such Pharmacopceia as often as they shall deem necessary." And by 25 & 26 Vict., c. 91, " the General Council of Medical Education and Eegistration of the United Kingdom" is created a body corporate, and the exclusive right of publishing, printing, and selling the Pharmacopoeia is vested in the said Council, and the Treasury is empowered to fix the price of copies from time to time. Section II. DENTISTS. By the 55th section of the Medical Act it is provided that "nothing in the Act contained shall be construed to prejudice or in any way affect the lawful occupation, trade, or business of dentists ;" aud by a previous section (48) her Majesty is empowered by charter to grant to the Royal College of Surgeons of England power to institute and hold examinations for the purpose of testing the fitness of persons to practise as dentists who may be desirous of being so examined, and to grant certificates of such fitness. By 32 Hen. VIII., c. 42, s. 3, " drawing of teeth" is excepted from among those " things belonging to surgery" which any one " using barbery or shaving within the city of London, suburbs, or one mile circuit of the said city," was thenceforth prohibited from practising, and hence this art fell into, or rather perhaps remained almost entirely in, the hands of the barbers, and until a recent period was not cultivated by the surgeons as even ancillary to their calling. Now, however, there seems a probability of giving a pro- fessional surgical status to those who make this specialty their almost exclusive study, to the great relief, comfort, and security of those whom fate compels to seek their aid. 147 CHAPTEE XVI. MEDICAL ETHICS. Medical Ethics, by which may be understood the conventional rules that prevail for regulating the intercourse among medical practitioners, and in which also their patients are indirectly in- terested, do not, strictly speaking, form a subject that can be treated of in these pages, inasmuch as they are no part of the law of the land, but rather relate to the social amenities which, like those of the Bar, form a code of etiquette, upon the due obser- vance of which the profession most properly relies for the cultiva- tion of a high tone of character among its members, alike beneficial to the practitioner and those requiring the aid of his services. But as far as they bear upon the legal responsibility of those whose con- duct should be guided by them, they have already been indirectly suggested under the various heads of the Duties, Eights, and Liabilities of Medical Practitioners, whether as witnesses in courts of justice, as authors, medical referees, or as holding the relation of partners, principals, or assistants, or as undertaking the delicate and responsible duty of drawing up and attesting the wills of their patients, or as confidants of communications made to them by those who so naturally look upon them in the light of their truest friends in the hour of need. Utterly deprecating any attempt to weaken the bonds of the latter sacred relationsliip, it is perhaps better, nevertheless, when legal or clerical assistance can be readily obtained, to leave each profession to do its own particular work — the lawyer to do his part in assisting the patient in the settlement of his worldly affairs, and the clergyman to perform the functions of his sacred oflice. A consultation with the latter as to the most fitting moment when, without distressing or fatiguing the patient, he may minister to him that consolation for which he sometimes appeals even to his earthly physician, and which, by inspiring hope and resignation, may not infrequently operate beneficially in aiding his bodily infirmity, would in many instances be invaluable. "With these few remarks the subject of Medical Ethics must, for the reasons before given, be dismissed ; as to other works, such as L2 1 48 MEDICAL ETHICS. " Percival's Medical Ethics," and " Langley's Via Medica,"* the practitioner or student must refer for the regulation of his conduct botli in the hospital, and in private practice, in all matters relating to the amenities to be cultivated both morally and socially. At the same time it is as well to observe that the former work, having been originally published so long ago as 1803, although repub- lished in 1849, would in some respects lead any one relying on its legal accuracy into most serious errors. The chapter on " Profes- sional duties in certain cases which require a knowledge of the law," is, in respect to the law of wills, entirely revolutionized, and indeed the whole of that chapter, which forms so large a portion of the Avork, is more or less affected by modern legislation. Mr. Langley's " Via Medica," being of comparatively recent date, of course is free from any such objection, and is replete with many valuable suggestions on the subject of which it mainly treats, viz., the mores medici, which clearly cannot form a matter of discussion in the present treatise. Suffice it to say — Ingenuas dedicisse Jldeliter artes, emoUit mores. At the same time the following valuable rules of conduct, care- fully revised, by an eminent member of the medical profession, will be read with interest : — Of Professional Conduct, whether in Hospital, Private, or General Practice. 1. The same moral rules of conduct should prevail, whether towards hospital patients or in private and general practice. It is unnecessary to say that every case committed to the charge of a physician or surgeon should be treated with care, attention, and humanity ; every allowance should be made for the whims and ca- prices of the sick, secrecy and delicacy should be strictly observed, and the familiarity and confidential intercourse to which members of the faculty are admitted should ever be used with the most scru- pulous regard to fidelity and honour. 2. The strictest temperance should at all times be practised, as the exercise of the duties and functions of medical men requires a clear liead, a vigorous mind, and oftentimes a steady hand, and, on emergencies, even the life of a fellow-creature may depend upon the possession by the professional man of all these essentials. * See also " On the Duties and Qualifications of a Physician," by John Gregory, M.D., &c. Loudon : 1820. "The Mor.il Aspects of Medical Life, &c.," by James Mackness, M.D., &c. London: 1846. " A Manual of Clinical ]\Iedicine and Physical Diagnosis." by T. H. Tanner, M.D. The Second Ildition, revised by Dr. Tilbury Fox. London: 1869. MEDICAL ETHICS. 149 3. The medical practitioner sliould, wherever the case justifies it, encourage the patient with hopes of recovery ; but, on the other hand, witliout indulging in gloomy prognostications, he should not fail on suitable occasions to warn the friends of the patient, or even the patient himself, of any real or imminent danger when it has actually arisen. 4. Olllc'ious intercourse in a case under the charge of another should be carefully avoided ; no meddling inquiries should be made concerning the patient ; no officious hints given relative to the nature or treatment of the disorder, nor any innuendoes indulged in that may tend either directly or indirectly to diminish the trust reposed in the medical attendant in charge of the case. 5. When a medical practitioner is called to a patient who has been under the care of another medical gentleman, a consultation with the latter should be proposed, even though he may have dis- continued his visits. His treatment of the case liad better not be criticised ; but if it be noticed, it ought to be regarded with candour, and even justified, so far as probity and truth will permit ; and, a good understanding thus established between a former and a subsequent practitioner, may serve to suggest further means of relief without at all impeacliing the professional skill or knowledge exhibited in the primary treatment of the case, though such treat- ment may have been unsuccessful. 6. In large and wealthy communities, the distinction between physic and surgery should, as far as' possible, be steadily maintained, for the division of skill and labour is no less advantageous in the liberal sciences than in the mechanical arts ; but, in small com- munities or rural districts, such an attempt at distinction in the present day would virtually leave patients without the necessar)' combined assistance so much required, and perhaps lead them to fly for succour to any audacious empiric who would not be so scrupulous on the subject of " division of labour." As medical men can now, if they possess varied qualifications, be registered in all of them, cases of breacli of this rule of etiquette are not in future likely to arise. 7. Consultations should be promoted in difficult or protracted cases, as they give rise to confidence and an interchange of ideas to the advantage of the sick person ; and every respect should be shown towards the medical man first engaged, and too much stress should not be laid upon tlie strict precedency of seniority or rank. 8. A medical practitioner may sometimes be hastily summoned, through the anxiety or sudden alarm of the patient or his family, to visit a patient already under the care of another, to whom notice of this call has not been given. In such a case, no change in the treatment of the patient should be made until a consultation has 150 MEDICAL ETHICS. taken place, unless the lateness of the hour precludes such a meeting, or the symptoms of the case are too pressing to admit of delay. 9. Theoretical discussions at consultation should be avoided, as occasioning much perplexity and seldom leading to any practical result. 10. Punctuality, as far as possible, should be observed in meeting in consultation ; visits to the sick, either singly or in consultation, should not be unreasonably repeated, because, when too frequent, they tend to diminish medical authority or influence, and might be objectionable to the patient himself. 11. When one medical man officiates for another who is sick or absent during any considerable length of time, he should receive a portion op the whole of the fees accruing during such interval, according to previous arrangement ; but if this neighbourly act be of short duration, it had better be gratuitously performed, and the utmost delicacy should be exhibited towards the interests of the absent brother practitioner. 12. The legal claim to fees and their amount are subjects which have been dealt with in a previous part of this work ; but in the consideration of fees it should be ever borne in mind that the characteristic benevolence of the profession is inconsistent with sordid views or avaricious greed ; and although " the labourer is worthy of his reward," and duty to himself and his family demands a consideration of his material interests, yet knowledge, benevolence, and their practical application to the benefit of his fellow creatures, are of the highest importance, and in the cultivation of them he will not lose his reward ; for his character will always in such case be his recommendation, even to those who do not desire to derive any undue advantage from his liberality, and who may be willing as well as able to repay his services in a substantial form. 13. All members of the profession, together with their wives and children, should be attended gratuitously by any other members of the Faculty, provided at least they reside within a reasonable dis- tance. Great care should be taken not to obtrude visits officiously, as such over-civility, however well intended, may cause embarrass- ment, or interfere with the exercise of a free choice, on which so much of confidence depends. 14. Clergymen, or at least the unbeneficed clergy, are sometimes visited gratuitously. As a rule, however, even curates with large families will make an effort to maintain their self-respect and in- dependence by offering some remuneration. 15. Should a medical man have to certify to the illness of any official, who through such temporary incapacity claims exemption from the duties of his situation, whether in the army, navy, or civil MEDICAL ETHICS. 151 service, or as taking part in the administration of justice as a jury- man, truth and probity should be the paramount consideration. Such certificates are assurances to the public, and should never be given without a strict and faithful scrutiny, and even private friend- ship should not be permitted to sway the judgment in suc-h cases. 16. A medical man should cautiously guard against whatever may injure the general respectability of the profession, and be careful to avoid any affectation of scepticism, even iu a vein of jocularity, con- cerning the efficacy and utility of the healing art. 17. Should a diversity of opinion or controversy arise as to the professional conduct of any one of the Facvdty, the point in dispute should be referred to the arbitration of two other medical men, one of wdiom to be selected by the party complained of; and in case of their differing, the decision to be referred to an umpire, previously named by the two arbitrators. The adjudication should not be made public, but submissively acquiesced in and accepted con amove. 18. When a case has terminated fatally, it may be useful and instructive to indulge in a retrospect of the treatment adopted. Regrets may possibly follow ; but if the object is really honestly to review a course of treatment with a view to avoiding errors, even though only of judgment and not of science, for the future, the consciousness of good intentions will sufficiently justify the past, and the desire thus evinced to subserve a more matured experience for the future will be a sufficient atonement for those errors which the imperfection of human skill, and a subsequent knowledge of events, must constantly, though perhaps tardily, disclose. 19. One grown old iu the useful and honourable exercise of the healing art may yet continue to enjoy, and justly to enjoy, the un- abated confidence of the public ; the quickness of the eye, the delicacy of the touch, and the steadiness of hand, which are so essential to the skilful performance of operations, may no longer be his, but he may still retain an unclouded judgment, and must have the advantage of great experience. If he can happily, under such circumstances, perceive wherein his deficiencies consist, and retire to the exercise of the revered and valuable duties of an adviser and a counsellor, rather than attempt the continuance of those more practical and physical functions involved in general practice, and requiring energy, activity, and nerve, he may yet apply his knowledge and experience to the benefit of mankind, and himself enjoy to the last the un- speakable satisfaction of a " mens conscia recti." One remark may be made on the difference between the position of the medical man in private and in public practice (whether as medical officer of a hospital, a prison, or workhouse, or of a Poor- Law district, or even as a surgeon or assistant surgeon iu the army 152 MEDICAL ETHICS. or navy). The difference consists in this, that in the case of the public medical oflBcer no choice is allowed to the patients who come under his care, and yet personal confidence is not less important to the comfort and relief of the sick poor, or even criminal class, than of the rich, when by sickness distinctions are thus levelled. More than ordinary pains should therefore be taken to inspire with confidence those who sometimes look with suspicion upon eleemo- synary relief of any kind, and to treat scruples with respect, and even prejudices with consideration. Conjoint Medical JEccamination Board for eacli of the three Divisions of the United Kingdom. One uniform qualification for practice is of course the object here aimed at. Sound practical medical education is the general desi- deratum, and if this can be accomplished by the process of levelling, provided it be in the direction of levelling up and not levelling down, a great object would be effected. The General Medical Council have already invited co-operation. It, however, scarcely seems necessary that the general practitioner should be required to possess the amount of knowledge requisite for the higher medical examinations, especially considering the number of highly-educated medical men now scattered over the country whose assistance in difficult cases can generally be obtained at a comparatively small expense to the patient. Indeed, without underrating the scholastic attainments of the bulk of those intended for general practitioners, it may fairly be doubted whether the levelling up system could for some time to come be fairly responded to. If the examination, on the other hand, were simply of a practical character, and that the license to practise, founded upon it, should be for every member of the Profession one and the same, this might operate as a dis- couragement to academical training, and thus, by granting no pri- vilege to the University graduates, but reducing them to one uniform level with all other practitioners, would tend to the depre- ciation of such distinctions, or at least to their acknowledgment merely as ornamental appendages to be enjoyed by the wealthy and dilettante classes alone, culminating in a dead level of ambition and laudable emulation. It becomes a further matter of serious consideration with the Profession whether, whilst an improvement might be effected in general medical education, it is desirable to abolish all distinctions in the relative departments of medical and surgical science. Upon this question the author of this work, not being a medical man, cannot presume to offer an opinion, and apologizes for even ven- toring the above hints. ]53 SIJPPLEMENTAET CHAPTER TO THE BODT OF THE WOEK. DISSERTATION ON THE TITLE OF DOCTOR OF MEDICINE, OR DOCTOR OF PDYSIC. According to the draft of an Act of Parliament, 9 Hen. Y. — " K^o one shall use the mysterie of fysyk, unless he hath studied it iu some university, and is at least a bachelor in that science. The sheriff" shall inquire whether any one practises in his county con- trary to this regulation ; and if any one so practise, he shall forfeit 40/., and be imprisoned." So great a regard, not merely pre- ference, was shown at this time to those medically educated in some university, but such regard was not confined to those who had pursued the study at Oxford or Cambridge ; the phrase, "some university," being probably used advisedly, in order to embrace foreign universities where the science of physic was cultivated with much success. It appears, however, that this draft Act, or, as it would be called in tlie present day, " Bill," never had the effect of an Act of Parliament — why, docs not appear, but possibly par- liament declined so to limit the practitioners in physic, notwith- standing the wish of the king. In re Dr. Bonham, 8 Co. ]07-ll-i, Mic. Ter. 6 Jac. I., which was an action for false imprisonment of the plaintiff by the Presi- dent and censors of the College of Physicians and their servants, the question was raised whether the College had any authority over doctors of the University, the plaiutift" being a doctor of physic of Cambridge, practising in London, but without the license or authority of the College. The following . remarks of Lord Chief Justice Coke show the impression existing shortly after the incorporation of the College, of the status of its doctors, this being the first judgment concerning fine and imprisonment given since tiie granting of the Charter and the passing of the Acts of Parliament eoncerning it. The Chief Justice, because much was said in commendation of the doctors of physic of the College in London, and somewhat, as he con- 154 SUPPLEMENTARY CHAPTER. ceived, in derogation of the dignity of the doctors of the Universities, attributed first much to the doctors of the said College in London, and confessed that nothing was spoken in their recommendation which was not due to their merits ; but yet that no comparison was to be made between that private College and either of the Univer- sities of Cambridge and Oxford : no more than between father and his children, or than between the fountain and the small rivers that descend from it. The University is alma mater, from whose breasts those of that private college have sucked all their science and know- lege, which I acknowledge to be great and profound ; but the law saith, " erubescit lex filios castigare parentes :" the university is the fountain, " et melius est petere fontes quam sectari rivulos." Briefly, " Academise Cantabrigiae et Oxoniae sunt Athense uostrse nobilissimae, regni soles, occuli et animae regni, unde religio, huuia- nitas, et doctrina in omnes regni partes uberrime diffunduntur ;" but it is true, " nunquam sufficiet copia lanctatoris, quia nunquam deficiet materia laudis," and therefore those universities exceed and excel all private colleges, " quantum inter viburna cupressus." According to the Act 14 Hen. VIII., five manner of persons were to be promoted to the office of physician, viz., those who w^ere, J., profound ; II., sad ; III., discreet ; IV., groundedly learned ; v., profoundly studied. And it was well ordained that the professors of physic should be profound, sad, discreet, &c., and not youths who have no gravity and experience ; for as one saith, " in juvene theologo conscientiae detrimentum, in juvene legista bursas detri- mentum, in juvene medico caemeterii incrementum." And it ought to be presumed every doctor of any of the universities to be within the statutes : sc, to be profound, sad, discreet, groundedly learned, and profoundly studied ; for none can there be master of arts, wlio is a doctor ofphilosopJiy, under the study of seven years, and cannot be doctor in physic under seven years more in the study of physic ; and that is the reason that the plaintiif is named in the declaration doctor of philosophy and doctor of physic ; " quia oportet medicum esse philosophum, ubi enim philosophus desiuit medicus incipit." It will be observed in this judgment that Lord Coke speaks of the " doctors of physic of the college in London," and proceeds to contrast their status with that of the " doctors of the universities." The plaintiff was described in the declaration as a doctor in philosophy and physic, but yet there is no such academical degree as doctor in philosophy, conferred by diploma or otherwise by either University of Oxford or Cambridge, but that designation is included, as Lord Coke puts it, in the degree of Master of Arts. And so " oportet medicum esse philosophum, ubi enim philosophus desinit medicus incipit." In other words every duly recognised " Medicus," like every " Magister Artium," is a doctor of philosophy, and " ubi SUPPLEMENTARY CHAPTER. 155 philosophus desinit medicus incipit." He is, if one of the College of Physicians, also a doctor of physic in all its branches, including surgery, though not a Doctor of Medicine par excellence, which special designation pertains alone to doctors of the Universities whose practice is limited to pure medicine, " Medicua" is a more ancient designation than that of either doctor or bachelor of medi- cine. We find from the Exon Domesday, which furnished a portion of the materials from which the great Domesday, or General Survey of "William the Conqueror, was compiled, that Nigel, the physician, is there described as " Medicus," and not Doctor or Bachelor of Medicine. "Medicus" and "Doctor" are both used in the Act of Henry VIII., incorporating the College of Physicians. The term " Medicus" is there applied individually to all the medical members of the corporation who are mentioned by name, and the body itself is declared to be " collegium perpetuum doctorum et gravium virorum, qui medicinam in urbe nostra Londino et suburbiis, intraque septem millia passuum ab ea urbe quaqueversus publice exerceant." The three first-named members are designated, as it were emphatically, " gravium virorum doctorum," and also as " medicorum nos- trorum/' or the king's physicians, and the others as simply " medi- corum," but " medicus" has at the same time always been considered as implying the style and title of " doctor of physic," and hence it is that the College, by an express bye-law, forbids those of its licentiates who are permitted to practise pharmacy among their own patients to assume the title of Doctor of Medicine, or use any other name, title, designation, or distinction implying that they are graduates in medicine of an University, unless they be graduates in medicine of an University. It would therefore seem that, but for this bye-law so prohibiting them, such licentiates, though neither fellows nor members of the College, might assume the title at least of Doctor, which might lead to the above impli- cation, without incurring any penalty, and indeed as of right ; and a fortiori, therefore, may the members and fellows, who are of a higher grade in the College, do so. If this were otherwise, even though such might not be liable to be summarily convicted under the 40th section of the Medical Act, for " wilfully and falsely pre- tending to, and taking or using the name or title of a Doctor of Medicine," the above bye-law would surely be wholly unnecessary, or at least supererogatory. 156 APPENDIX. Cases decided in tlie County Courts upon tlie claim of tlie Medical liefer ee of tlie Assured to the payment of a fee hy the Company. Colchester Cofntt Court (October, 1850). Philbkick v. Whetham. Defendant was sued as one of the directors of the National Provident Institution for the fee of one guinea for furnishing particulars as to the health of a party proposing to assure his life in that office. The circular requesting the favour of answers to questions contaiued in that document was from the Secretary. The phiintifF admitted that he had furnished certificates to the office on previous occasions without charge ; life assuiances not being then so prevalent as to make the practice a burden to the profession, but since these applications had become so frequent he had refused to supply the information without payment ; but it appeared in the two instances, mentioned by him, in which he had received payment from the Company's agent in Colchester, he was aware that the money came from the parties effecting the insurance, and not from the office. Por the defence, but in answer to the Judge, the agent of the office said that the plaintiff repeatedly told him he would not furnish any more certificates without a fee ; but he had never said that in case of applications to him he should hold the Company liable : that he believed this was the first cir- cular sent to the plaintift' direct from the secretary, those which had been furnished gratuitously having ail come from himself as agent. Upon this it was submitted, on behalf of the plaintift', that the last answer was a very material one to the plaintiff's case, as showing a new mode of application to him, after he had declined to furnish more certificates without payment. It was also urged that upon the face of the secretary's letter itself the agreement was between the office and himself; for the letter could not be con- strued otherwise than as a request from the office to perform cer- tain services on their account. His Honour said, if the letter had APPENDIX. 157 stood alone, anrl thia had been the first transaction of the kind between the plaintiff and the office, he thought they would have beeu liable and must have paid him; but now, as it appeared to him, the whole depended upon what had previously takeu place. Of course the plaintiff was not bouud to continue {"urnishiug cer- tificates gratuitously, but he was of opiuion that he could not claim payment without previous notice. Judgment for the defendaut. HoopEE V. TnE Graham Life Assurance Society. In the Suoreditch County Court. Before Mr. Serjeant Storks (Judge), June 7th, 18-51 The claim was of a like nature to the last. The letter from the secretary of the society commenced thus: — "PROPOSERS MEDICAL REFEREE. " To Mr. Hooper, Queen's Road, Dalston. " Sir, — Mr. Jacob J. Davies, who has been proposed to this office for an assurance on his life, has given a reference to you for private and confidential answers to the following queries." Then follow the queries, and there is a note at the foot, thus : — " The directors would be obliged by your answering each of the questions separately." Answers were accordingly returned to the society, for which the plaintiff some time afterwards claiuied the fee of one guinea. This the society refused to pay. At the conclusion of the trial, his Honour said: — "The question in this case is whether there was an implied assumpsit. The argu- ment that the medical referee is the selection of the assured is certainly a strong one : for, although the questions are put down by the society, the name of the referee is given by the assured. I don't think there is any evidence of an implied assumpsit beyond the sending of the letter. That is my present impression, but it is a question of too general importance to be decided oft-hand. I shall take time, therefore, to consider my judgment." The following judgment was afterwards delivered by the Court. — " The question turns upon whether there was a contract expressed or implied — what the law calls assuiiipait. It is perfectly clear in this case there was no contract expressed — that there was nothing approaching a precise and specific contract. Then the question as to whether there was an implied assumpsit arises. Assurance offices 158 APPENDIX. have made certain rules and regulations upon which they hold out to the public that they are willing to enter into a contract. There- fore, the contract is from the beginning as between the assured and the assurer. The contract is that the parties shall give certain securities to them, and they assure his life upon certain conditions ; and one of the conditions is that answers by a medical practitioner shall be forwarded to the society in reply to certain inquiries (as set forth in their printed letter) as to the state of health of the proposed assurer. Tliey know not the medical practitioner to whom they are referred, and have never had any communication with him, but they take it for granted that he must know something of the assured. Now, let us advert to the letter sent by the secretary of the society at the request of the assured. A proposal is made which the medical referee knows nothing of, and they agree to assure the party's life on condition that the inquiries are satisfac- torily answered, and from the letter adverted to it is clear that the society had no communication whatever with the referee before the proposal is made. It would be very true, if there was nothing in the letter sent by the secretary to Mr. Hooper which showed that it was the act of the party who had proposed to the office for an insurance on his life, and that the opinion of a medical gentleman as to his state of health was one of the conditions upon which the society agrees to assure a party's life, that the medical referee might say, ' You have no right to draw upon my skill and services.' And if it was put upon that principle abstractedly, it might be a question whether the medical practitioner would not be entitled to remuneration. But the contract here is between the assurer and the assured. The society say, ' The medical man is not of our choosing, nor are we dependent upon his skill.' In my opinion, it is one of the conditions made with the assured, that a medical man shall answer the questions proposed by the society. This is the basis of the contract, and the meaning of it is ' not that we shall trouble ourselves to select a referee,' we leave it to your honour to choose some one who shall supply us with the information we require. I can see no contract in this between the company and the third party — the medical man. The plaintiff might have said, I shall not send answers unless I am paid. Upon the whole, I am decidedly of opinion that the plaintiff in this case is not entitled to recover." Duplex and another, v. The Economic Life Office. In the Sheriff's Couet, London (August 24, 1852). Before Mr. Eussell Gurnet, Q.C. The same question was involved in this action as in the two previous APPENDIX. 159 cases. The only difference between this and the last case was, that in the present case the plaintiff in returning the answers to the questions asked by the defendants also inclosed a note stating that his fee was a guinea, which he requested should be forwarded to him. His Honour thought that no case had been made out against the defendants. The plaintili's need not liave answered the questions without the fee, and the letter enclosing the questions stated that they were referred by the lady proposing her life for assurance ; he felt bound to refuse the claim of the plaintiffs. Verdict for defendants. Opinions of the Judges on questions propounded by the House of Lords. The following questions of law were propounded by the House of Lords to the Judges, in relation to alleged crimes committed by persons afflicted with insane delusions, and, together with the answers, were ordered by the House to be printed, on the 19th of June, 1843 : — "1. What is the law respecting alleged crimes committed by persons afflicted with insane delusion in respect of one or more particular subjects or persons ; as, for instance, where, at the time of the commission of the alleged crime, the accused knew he was acting contrary to law, but did the act complained of with a view, under the influence of insane delusion, of redressiuiz or rt-veno-iu" some supposed grievance or injury, or of producing some supposed public benefit ? " 2. What are the proper questions to be submitted to tlie jury when a person alleged to be afflicted with insane delusion respecting one or more particular subjects or persons is charged with tlie commission of a crime (murder, for example), and insanity is set up as a defence ? " 3. In what terms ought the question to be left to the jury as to the prisoner's state of mind at the time when the act was com- mitted ? "4. If a person under an insane delusion as to existing facts commits an offence in consequence thereof, is he hereby excused ? " 5. Can a medical man conversant with the disease of iusanitv, who never saw the prisoner previous to the trial, but who was present during the whole trial, and the examination of all the wit- nesses, be asked his opinion as to the state of the prisoner's mind at the time of the commission of the alleged crime ; or his opinion whether the prisoner was conscious at the time of doing tlae act 160 APPENDIX, that he was acting contrary to law, or wlietlier he was labouring under any and what delusion at the time ?" Mr. Justice Maule. — I feel great difficulty in answering the questions put by your lordships on this occasion : first, because they do not appear to arise out of, and are not put with reference to a particular case, or for a particular purpose, which might ex- plain or limit the generality of their terms, so that full answers to them ought to be applicable to every possible state of facts, not inconsistent with those assumed in the questions ; and this diffi- culty is the greater from the practical experience both of the Bar and the Court being confined to questions arising out of the facts of particular cases : secondly, because I have heard no argument at vour lordships' Bar, or elsewhere, on the subject of these questions, the want of which I feel the more, the greater is the number and extent of questions which might be raised in argument : and, thirdly, from a fear, of which I cannot divest myself, that, as these questions relate to matters of criminal law of great importance and frequent occurrence, the answers to them by the judges may em- barrass the administration of justice when they are cited in criminal trials. Tor these reasons, I should have been glad if my learned brethren would have joined me in praying your lordships to excuse us from answering these questions : but, as I do not think they ought to induce me to ask that indulgence for myself individually, I shall proceed to give such answers as I can, after the very short time which I have had to consider the questions, and under the difficulties I have mentioned, fearing that my answers may be as little satisfactory to others as they are to myself. The first question, as I understand it, is, in effect, What is the law respecting alleged crime, when at the time of the commission of it the accused knew he was acting contrary to the law, but did the act with a view, under the influence of some delusion, of redressing or revenging some supposed grievance or injury, or of producing some supposed public benefit ? If I were to under- stand this question according to the strict meaning of its terms, it would require, in order to answer it, a solution of all questions of law which could arise on the circumstances stated in the question, either by explicitly stating and answering such questions, or by stating some principles or rules which would suffice for the solution. I am quite unable to do so, and, indeed, doubt whether it be possible to be done ; and therefore request to be permitted to answer the question only so far as it comprehends the question whether a person, circumstanced as stated in the question, is for that reason only to be found not guilty of a crime respecting which the question of his guilt has been duly raised in a criminal proceeding ; and I am of opinion that he is not. There is no law that I am aware of APPENDIX. 161 that makes persons in the state described in the question not re- sponsible for their criminal acts. To render a person irrespon- sible for crime on account of unsoundness of mind, the unsoundness should, according to the law as it has long been understood and hold, be such as to render him incapable of knowing right from wrong. The terms used in the question cannot be said (with reference only to the usage of language) to be equivalent to a de- scription of this kind and degree of unsoundness of mind. If the state described in the question be one which involves or is neces- sarily connected with such an unsoundness, this is not a matter of law, but of physiology, and not of that obvious and familiar kind as to be inferred without proof. Secondly: The questions necessarily to be submitted to the jury are those questions of fact which are raised out of the record. In a criminal trial the question commonly is, whether the accused be guilty or not guilty ; but, in order to assist the jury in coming to a right conclusion on this necessary and ultimate question, it is usual and proper to submit such subordinate or intermediate questions as the course which the trial has taken may have made it convenient to direct their attention to. What those questions are, and the manner of submitting them, is a matter of discretion for the Judge, a discretion to be guided by a consideration of all the circumstances attending the inquiry. In performing this duty it is sometimes necessary, or convenient, to inform the jury as to the law ; and if, on a trial such as is suggested in the question, he should have occasion to state what kind and degree of insanity would amount to a defence, it should be stated conformably to what I have mentioned in my answer to the first question, as being, in my opinion, the law on this subject. Thirdly : There are no terms which the Judge is by law required to use. They should not be inconsistent with the law as above stated, but should be such as, in the discretion of the Judges, are proper to assist the jury in coming to a right conclusion as to the guilt of the accused. Fourthly : The answer which I have given to the first question is applicable to this. Fifthly : Whether a question can be asked depends, not merely on the questions of fact raised on the record, but on the course of the cause at the time it is proposed to ask it, and the state of an inquiry as to the guilt of a person charged with a crime, and de- fended on the ground of insanity, may be such that such a question as either of tliose suggested is proper to be asked and answered, though the witness has never seen the person before the trial, and tliough he has been present and heard the witnesses ; these cireum- Btances, of his never having seen the person before, and of his having M 162 APPENDIX, been present at the trial, not being necessarily sufEcient, as it seems to me, to exclude the lawfulness of a question which is other- wise lawful, though I will not say that an inquiry might not be in such a state as that these circumstances should have such an eiFect. Supposing there is nothing else in the state of the trial to make the questions suggested proper to be asked and answered, except that the witness has been present and heard the evidence, it is to be considered whether that is enough to svistain the question. In principle it is open to this objection, that, as the opinion of the witness is founded on those conclusions of fact which he forms from the evidence : and, as it does not appear what those conclusions are, it may be that the evidence he gives is on such an assumption of facts as makes it irrelevant to the inquiry. But such questions have been very frequently asked, and the evidence to which they have been directed has been given, and has never, that I am aware of, been successfully objected to. Evidence most clearly open to this objection, and on the admission of which the event of a most important trial probably turned, was raised in the case of The Queen v. McNaughten, tried at the Central Criminal Court in March last, before the Lord Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Williams, and Mr. Justice Coleridge, in which counsel of the highest eminence were engaged on both sides ; and I think the course and practice of receiving such evidence, confirmed by the very high authority of those Judges, who not only received it, but left it, as I understand, to the jury without any remark derogating from its weight, ought to be held to warrant its reception, notwithstanding the objection in principle to which it may be open. In cases even where the course of practice in criminal law has been unftivourable to parties accused, and entirely contrary to the most obvious principles of justice and humanity, as well as those of law, it has been held that such practice constituted the law, and could not be altered without the authority of Parliament. Chief Justice Tindal. — My Lords, her Majesty's judges, with the exception of Mr. Justice Maule, who has stated his opinion to your Lordships' House, think it right, in the first place, to state that they have forborne entering into any particular discussion upon these questions, from the extreme and almost insuperable difiiculty of applying those answers to cases in which the facts are not brought judicially before them. The facts of each particular case must of necessity present themselves with endless variety, and with every shade of difference in each case ; and, as it is their duty to declare tlie law upon each particular case, on facts proved before them, and after hearing arguments of counsel thereon, they deem it at once impracticable, and at the same time dangerous to the administration of justice, if it were practicable, to attempt to APPENDIX. 163 make minute applications of the principles involved in the answers given by them to your Lordships' questions. They have, therefore, confined tlieir answers to the statement of that which they hold to be the law upon the abstract questions proposed by your Lordships : and as they deem it unnecessary, in this particular case, to deliver their opinions seriatim, and as all concur in the same opinion, they desire me to express such their unanimous opinion to your Lordships. The first question pro- posed by your Lordships is this : — " What is the law respecting alleged crimes committed by persons afflicted with insane delusion in respect of one or more particular subjects or persons ; as for instance, where at the time of the commission of the alleged crime, the accused knew he was acting contrary to law, but did the act complained of with a view, under the influence of insane delusion, of redressing or revenging some supposed grievance or injury, or of producing some supposed public benefit ?" In answer to which question, assuming that your Lordships' inquiries are confined to those persons who labour under such partial delusions only, and are not in other respects insane, we are of opinion that, notwithstanding the party accused did the act com- plained of with a view, under the influence of insane delusion, of redressing or revenging some supposed grievance or injury, or of producing some public benefit, he is nevertheless punishable if he knew at the time of committing such crime that he was acting contrary to law — by which expression we understand your Lordships to mean the law of the land. Tour Lordships are pleased to inquire of us, secondly, " "What are the proper questions to be submitted to the jury, when a person alleged to be afflicted with insane delusions respecting one or more particular subjects or persons is charged with the com- mission of a crime (murder, for example), and insanity is set up as a defence ?" And, thirdly, " In what terms ought the question to be left to the jury as to the prisoner's state of mind at the time when the act was committed ?" And as these two questions appear to us to be more conveniently answered together, we have to submit our opinion to be, that the jury ought to be told, in all cases, that every man is presumed to be sane, and to possess a suf- ficient degree of reason to be responsible for his crimes, until the contrary be proved to their satisfaction ; and that, to establish a defence on the ground of insanity, it must be clearly proved that, at the time of the committing of the act, the party accused was labouring under such a defect of reason, from disease of the mind, as not to know the nature and quality of the act he was doing, or, if he did know it, that he did not know he was doing what was wrong. The mode of putting the latter part of the question to the jury on these m2 164 APPENDIX. occasions lias generally been, whether the accused, at the time of doing the act, knew the difference between right and wrong ; which mode, though rarely, if ever, leading to any mistake with the jury, is not, as we conceive, so accurate when put generally and in the abstract, as when put with reference to the party's knowledge of right and wrong in respect to the very act with which he is charged. If the question were to be put as to the knowledge of the accused, solely and exclusively with reference to the law of the land, it might tend to confound the jury, by inducing them to believe that an actual knowledge of the law of the land was essential in order to lead to a conviction ; w^hereas, the law is administered upon the principle that every one must be taken conclusively to know it, without proof that he does know it. If the accused was conscious that the act was one which he ought not to do, and if that act was at the same time contrary to the law of the land, he is punishable ; and the usual course, therefore, has been to leave the question to the jury, whether the party accused had a sufficient degree of reason to know that he was doing an act that was wrong ; and this course, we think, is correct, accompanied with such observations and explanations as the circumstances of each particular case may require. The fourth question which your Lordships have proposed to us is this: — "If a person under an insane delusion as to existing facts commits an offence, in consequence thereof is he thereby excused ?" To which qviestion the answer must, of course, depend on the nature of the delusion ; but, making the same assumption as we did before, namely, that he labours under such partial delusion only, and is not in other respects insane, we think he must be con- sidered in the same situation as to responsibility as if the facts with respect to which the delusion exists were real. For example, if under the influence of his delusion, he supposes another man to be in the act of attempting to take away his life, and he kills that man, as he supposes, in self-defence, he would be exempt from punishment. If his delusion was that the deceased had inflicted a serious injury to his character and fortune, and he killed him in revenge for such supposed injury, he would be liable to punishment. The question lastly proposed by your Lordships is : — " Can a medical man, conversant with the disease of insanity, who never saw the prisoner previous to the trial, but who was present during the whole trial and the examination of all the witnesses, be asked his opinion as to the state of the prisoner's mind at the time of the commission of the alleged crime, or his opinion whether the prisoner was conscious at the time of doing the act that he was acting con- trary to law, or whether he was labouriug under any and what delusion at the time ?" APPENDIX. 165 In answer thereto we state to your Lordships that we think the medical iiiau, under the circumstances supposed, cannot in strict- ness be asked liis opinion in the terms above stated, because each of those questions involved the determination of the truth of the facts deposed to, which it is for the jury to decide ; and the questions are not mere questions upon a matter of science, in which case such evidence is admissible. But, where the facts are admitted or not disputed, and the question becomes substantially one of science only, it may be convenient to allow the question to be put in that general form, though the same cannot be insisted on as a matter of rifirht. ACTS OF PARLIAJHENT PRINTED IN EXTENSO. Medical witnesses at Coroners Inquests. Lunacy. 6 & 7 William IV., cap. 89 1 Victoria, cap. 63 8 & 9 Victoria, cap. 100 \ 16 & 17 Victoria, cap. 96 16 & 17 Victoria, cap. 97 19 & 20 Victoria, cap. 87 18 & 19 Victoria, cap. 105 25 & 26 Victoria, cap. 86 25 & 26 Victoria, cap. IH 31 & 32 Victoria,' cap! 121 | ^^^'-'^acy (Pliarmaceutical chemists). 16 & 17 Victoria, cap. 100 30 & 31 Victoria, cap. 84 29 & 30 Victoria, cap. 35 32 & 33 Victoria, cap. 96 18 & 19 Victoria, cap. 116 18 & 19 Victoria, cap. 121 23 & 24 Victoria, cap. 77 29 & 30 Victoria, cap. 90 21 & 22 Victoria, cap. 90 22 Victoria, cap. 21 23 Victoria, cap. 7 23 & 24 Victoria, cap. 66 31 & 32 Victoria, cap. 29. Vaccination. Contagious diseases. Health (public Medical Acts. 166 APPENDIX. ANNO SEXTO & SEPTIMO GULIELMI IV. REGIS. CAP. LXXXIX. An Act to provide for the Attendance and Eemuneration of Medical Witnesses at Coroners Inquests. [17th August 1836.] Coroner empowered to summon Medical Witnesses, and to Direct the Performance of a post- mortem Examination. WHEREAS it is expedient to provide for the Attendance of Medical Witnesses at Coroners Inquests, also Remuneration for such Attendance, and for the Performance of post-mortem Examinations at such inquests ; be it therefore enacted by the King's most Excellent Majesty, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the Authority of the same, That from and after the passing of this Act, whenever upon the summoning or holding of any Coroner's Inquest it shall appear to the Coroner that the deceased Person was attended at his Death or during his last Illness by any legally qualified Medical Practitioner, it shall be lawful for the Coroner to issue his Order, in the Form marked (A.) in the Schedule hereunto annexed, for the Attendance of such Practitioner as a Witness at such Inquest ; and if it shall appear to the Coroner that the deceased Person was not attended at or immediately before his Death by any legally qualified Medical Practitioner, it shall be lawful for the Coroner to issue such Order for the Attendance of any legally qualified Medical Practitioner being at the Time in actual Practice in or near the Place where the Death has happened ; and it shall be lavpful for the Coroner, either in his Order for the Attendance of the Medical Witness, or at any Time between the issuing of such Order and the Termination of the Inquest, to direct the Performance of a post-mortem Examination, with or without an Analysis of the Contents of the Stomach or Intestines, by the Medical Witness or Witnesses who may be summoned to attend at any Inquest ; provided that if any Person shall state upon Oath before the Coroner that in his or her Belief the Death of the deceased Individual was caused partly or entirely by the improper or negligent Treatment of any Medical Practitioner or other Person, such Medical Practitioner or other Person shall not be allowed to perform or assist at the post-mortem Examination of the Deceased. A Majority of the Jury may require the Coroner to summon additional Medical Evidence if the first he not satisfactory. II. And be it further enacted, That whenever it shall appear to the greater Number of the Jurymen sitting at any Coroner's Inquest, that the Cause of Death has not been satisfactorily explained bj- the Evidence of the Medical Practitioner or other Witness or Witnesses who may be examined in the first instance, such greater Number of the Jurymen are hereby authorized and empowered to name to the Coroner in Writing any other legally qualified Medical Practitioner or Practi- tioners, and to require the Coroner to issue his Order, in the Form herein-before mentioned, for the Attendance of such last-mentioned Medical Practitioner or Practitioners as a Witness or Witnesses, and for the performance of a post-mortem Examination, with or without an Analysis of the Contents of the Stomach or Intestines, whether such an Examination has been performed before or not ; and if the Coroner, having been thereunto required, shall refuse to issue such Order, he shall be deemed guilty of a Misdemeanor, and shall be punishable in like Manner as if the same were a Misdemeanor at Common Law. Fees to Medical Witnesses to he paid out of Funds collected for Belief of the Poor. III. And be it further enacted, That when any legally qualified Medical Practitioner has attended upon any Coroner's Inquest in obedience to any such Order as aforesaid of the Coroner, the said Practitioner shall for such Attendance APPENDIX. 167 at any Inquest in Great Britain be entitled to receive such Remuneration or Fee as is nientioiiod in the Table marked (B.) in the Schedule hereunto annexed ; and for any Inquest held in Ireland, the said Practitioner shall be paid in the Manner provided by the Laws in force in that Part of the United Kingdom; and the Coroner is hereby reijuired and commanded to make, according to the Form marked (C. ) in the Schedule hereunto annexed, his Order for the Payment of such Kemuneration or Fee, when the Inquest shall be held in Great Britain, and such Order may be addressed and directed to the Churchwardens and Overseers of the Parish or Place in which the Death has happened ; and such Churchwardens and Overseers, or any One of them, is and are hereby required and commanded to pay the Sum of Money mentioned in such Order of the Coroner to the Medical Witness therein mentioned, out of the Funds collected for the Relief of the Poor of the said Place. No fee for a post-mortem Examination instituted tvithout Order from the Coroner. IV. Provided nevertheless, and be it further enacted, That no Order of Pay- ment shall be given, or Fee or Remuneration paid, to any Medical Practitioner for the Performance of any post-mortem Examination which may be instituted without the previous Direction of the Coroner. Inquests on Bodies of Persons dying in public Institutions. V. Provided also, and be it further enacted. That when any Inquest shall be holden on the Body of any Person who has died in any public Hospital or Infirmary, or in any Building or Place belonging thereto, or used for the Reception of the Patients thereof, or who has died in any County or other Lunatic Asylum, or in any public Infirmary or other public Medical Institution, whether the same be supported by Endowments or by voluntary Subscriptions, then and in such Case nothing herein contained shall be construed to entitle the Medical Officer whose Duly it may have been to attend the deceased Person as a Medical Officer of such Institution as aforesaid to the Fees or Remuneration herein provided. Penalty on Medical Practitioner for neglecting to attend. VI. And be it further enacted. That where any Order for the Attendance of any Medical Practitioner as aforesaid shad have been personally served upon such Practitioner, or where any such Order not personally served shall have been re- ceived by any Medical Practitioner in sufficient Time for him to have obeyed such Order, or wliere any such Order has been served at the Residence of any Medical Practitioner, and in every Case where any Medical Practitioner has not obeyed such Order, he shall for such Neglect or Disobedience forfeit the Sum of Five Pounds Sterling upon Complaint thereof made by the Coroner or any Two of the Jury before any Two Justices having Jurisdiction in the Parish or Place where the Inquest under which the Order issued was held, or in the Parish where such Medical Practitioner resides ; and such Two Justices are hereby required, upon such Complaint, to proceed to the Hearing and Adjudication of such Complaint, and, if such Medical Practitioner shall not show to the said Justices a good and sufficient Cause for not having obeyed such Order to enforce the said Penalty by Distress and Sale of the Offender's Goods, as they are empowered to proceed by any Act of Parliament for any other Penalty or Forfeiture. A ct not to extend to Scotland. VII. And be it enacted, That nothing in this Act contained shall extend to Scotland. SCHEDULE to which this Act refers. (A.) Form of Summons, Coroner's Inquest at upon the body of By virtue of this my Order as Coroner for you are required to appear before 168 APPENDIX. me and the Jury at on the Day of One thousand eight hundred and , at of the Clock, to give Evidence touching the Cause of Death of [a7ul then add, when the Witness is required to make or assist at a post-mortem Examination, and make or assist in making a post-mortem Examination of the Body, with [or with- out] an Analysis, as the Case may he\, and report thereon at the said Inquest. (Signed) Coroner. To Surgeon [or M.D., as the Case may 6e]. (B.) Table of Fees. 1. To every legally qualified Medical Practitioner for attending to give Evidence under the Provisions of this Act at any Coroner's Inquest whereat no post- mortem Examination has been made by such Practitioner, the Fee or Re- muneration shall be One Guinea. 2. For the making of a post-mortem Examination of the Body of the Deceased, either with or without an Analysis of the Contents of the Stomach or Intes- tines, and for attending to give Evidence thereon, the Fee or Remuneration shall be Two Guineas. (C.) Coroner's Order for the Payment of Medical Witnesses. By virtue of an Act of Parliament passed in Session of holden in the intituled I, the Coroner of and for do order you, the Overseers of the Parish \or Town- ship, as the Case may le], to pay to the Sum of [One Guinea, or Two Guineas, as the Case may be], being the Fee [or Fees] due to him for having attended as a Medical Witness at an Inquest holden before me this Day of upon the Body of about the Age of who was found dead at [or other Particidars or Description'], and at which said Inquest the Jury returned a Verdict of (Signed) Coroner. Witnessed by me of To the Overseers, et ccetera. ANNO PRIMO VICTORIA REGIN^, CAP. LXVIII. An Act to provide for Payment of the Expenses of holding Coroners Inquests. [15th Juli/ 1837.] Schedule to be made of Fees payable on holding Inquests. 6 <£; 7 IF. 4. c. 89. WHEREAS the holding of Coroners Inquests on dead Bodies is attended with divers necessary Expenses, for the Payment whereof no certain Provision is made by Law, and such Expenses have usually been discharged without any lawful Authority for that Purpose out of the Monies levied for the Relief of the Poor ; and it is expedient to make adequate legal Provision for the Payment of such Expenses: Be it therefore enacted by the Queen's most Excellent Majesty, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the Authority of the same. That the justices of the Peace for every County, Riding, Division, or Distnct in England and Wales, in General or Quarter Sessions assembled, shall, at tlie General or Quarter Sessions of the Peace to be holden next after the passing of this Act, or at some subsequent General or Quarter Sessions, and tiie Town Council of every Borough having a Coroner shall at the Quarterly Meeting of such Council which shall be holden next after the passing of this Act, or at some subsequent Quarterly meeting thereof, APPENDIX. 1 69 make or cause to be inade a Schedule of the several Fees, Allowances, and Dis- buraenients vvhich, on the holding of any Inquest on any dead Uody within such County, Riding-, Division, District, or Borough, may be lawfully paid and made by the Coroner holding such InqueHt (other than the Fees payalile to Medical Wii- nesses under and by virtue of an Act passed in the last Session of Parliament, intituled An Act to provide for the Attendance and ReTiiuneration of Medical Wit- nesses at Coroners Inquests) ; and it shall be lawful for such Justices in General or Quarter Sessions assembled, and for such Town Council at any such Quarterly Meeting as aforesaiil, from Time to Time to alter and vary such Schedule as to sucli Justices and Town Council respectively may seem fit ; and the saiil Justices and Town Council respectively shall cause a Copy of every such Schedule to be deposited with the Clerk of the Peace of such County, Riding, Division, District, or B rough, and one other Copy thereof to be delivered to every Coroner acting in and for such County, Riding, Division, District, or Borough as aforesaid ; and whenever any Intjuest shall be hoLlen on any dead Body the Coroner holding the same shall immediately after the Termination of the Proceedings advance and pay all Expenses reasonably incurred in and about the holding thereof, not exceeding the sums set forth in the said Schedule, and which Sums so advanced and paid shall be repaid to the said t!oroner in manner herein-after mentioned : Provided always, that until such Schedule as aforesaid shall have been made the Coroner shall advance and pay, at his Discretion, all reasonable Expenses of holding every Inquest within the Limits of his Jurisdiction, aud shall be repaid the amount thereof, in the same Manner as if the Sums so ])aid had been included in a Schedule duly made according to the Provisions of this Act. Coroners to pay Medical Witnesses. II. And be it enacted, That so much of the said Act passed in the last Ses.-ion of Parliament asdirects the Coroner to make outan Order on the Churchwardens and Overseers of the Parish in which any Death shall have happened for Payment of the Remuneration or Fee payable under the Provisions of that Act to auy Medical Practitionei-, and as directs such Churcliwardcns and Overseers to pay the same out of the Funds collected for the Relief of the Poor of such Parish, shall be and the same is hereby repealed, and in lieu thereof the Coroner shall, immediately after the Termination of the Proceedings at any Inquest, advance and pay such Remuneration or Fee to every Medical Witness summoned under the Provisions of the said Act, and the Amount thereof shall be repaid to the said Coroner in manner herein- after mentioned. Coroners of Counties to lay their Accounts hcfwe the Sessions, and C'/roners of Borouyhs to lay them before the Town Council. The Coroner to he repaid out of the County Hates or the Borough Fund. III. And be it enacted. That every Coroner acting in and for any County, Riding, Division, or District shall, within Four Months after holding any Inquest, cause a full and true Account of all Sums paid by him under the Provisions of this Act, including all Sums paid to any Medical Witness as aforesaid, to be laid before the Justices of the Peace of such County, Riding, Division, or District in General or Quarter Sessions assembled, or at any Adjournment thereof; and every Coroner of any Borough shall, within Four ISIonths after holding any Inquest, cause a full and true Account of all Sums paid by him uniier the Provisions of this Act, includ- ing as aforesaid, to be laid before the Town Council of such Borough ; and .all such Accounts shall be accompanied by such Vouchers as under the Circumstances may to such Justices or Coujicil respectively seem reasonable ; and such Justices or Council respectively may, if they shall think fit, exatuine the said Coroner on Oath as to such Account, and on being satisfied of the Correctness thereof such Justices or Council respectively shall nuike an Order on the Treasurer of the siiid County, Riding, Division, or District, or of the said Borough (us the Case m.ay be), for P.iuuent to the said Coroner not only of tlie Sum due to him on such Account, but also of a Sum of Six Shillings .and Eight-pence for every Inquest holden by him as aforesaid, over and above all other Fees and Allowances to which he is now by 170 APPENDIX. Law entitled ; and the Treasurer of any County, Riding, Division, or District on whom any sucli Order shall be made shall, out of the Monies in his Hands arising from the County Rates, and the Tieasurer of any Borough on whom any such Order shall be made shall, out of the Monies in his Hands on account of the Boroui^h Fund, pay to the said Coroner the Sum mentioned in such Order, without any Abatement or Deduction whatever ; and every such Treasurer shall, on passing his Accounts, be allowed all Sums which he shall pay in pursuance of any such Order as aforesaid. A cf applicable to London. IV. And be it enacted, That this Act and the several Provisions herein con- tained shall extend and be applicable to the City of London and the Town and Borough of Southward. A ct may be altered. V. And be it enacted, That this Act may be altered or repealed by any Act in this present Session of Parliament. ANNO OCTAVO & NONO VICTORIA REGINiE. CAP. C. An Act for the Regulation of the Care and Treatment of Lunatics. [4th August 1845.] The following Acts repealed, except as they repeal other Acts : 2 tfc 3 W. 4. c. 107. 3 tfc 4 W. 4. c. 64. 5 <£• 6 W. 4. c. 22. 1 cfc 2 Vict. c. 73. 5 Vict. c. 4. 5 tfc 6 Vict. c. 87. Proviso that present Visitors and Clerk shall act under this Act till new ones are appointed; and that Licences heretofore granted shall remain in force, unless, emuneration for his Services (to be paid out of the Monies or Funds herein-after mentioned) as the Justices for the County or Borough shall in General or Quarter Sessions direct. APPENDIX. 1 77 Provision for A ssistants to the Clerk of the Visitors. Oath of A ssistant. XXII. And be it enacted, That if the Clerk of any Visitors shall at any Time desire to employ an Assistant in the Execution of the Duties of his Office, sucL Clerk shall certify such Desire and the Name of such Assistant to one of the Visitors, being a Justice ; and if such Visitor shall apjjrove thereof he shall ad- minister the following Oath to such Assistant : ' T A.B. do solemnly swear, That I will faithfully keep secret all such Matters and ' JL Things as ^hall come to my Knowledge in conser^uence of my Employment as ' Assistant to the Clerk of the Visitors appointed for the County [or Borough] of * by virtue of an Act of Parliament ])assed in the Ninth Year of the ' Eeign of Her Majesty Queen Victoria, intituled [here insert the Title of the Act,"] ' unless required to divulge the same by legal Authority. So help me GOD.' And such Cierk may thereafter, at his own Cost, employ such Assistant. Pemons interested in any licensed House, or being Medical Attendant on any Patient therein, disqualified to act as Commissioner, Visitor, Secretary, Clerk, or Assistant. Disqualified Persons acting a Misdemeanor. Physicians, dx. contravening, Penalty lOl. XXIII. And be it enacted. That no Person shall be or act as a Commissioner, or Visitor, or Secretary, or Clerk to the Commissioners, or Clerk or Assistant Clerk to any Visitors, or act in granting any Licence, who shall then be, or siiall within One Year then next preceding have been, directly or indirectly interested in any House licensed for the Eeception of Lunatics, or the Profits of such Reception ; and no Physician or Surgeon (being a Commissioner), and no Physi- cian, Surgeon, or Apothecary, (being a Visitor,) shall sign any Certificate for the Admission of any Patient into any licensed House or Hospital, or shall profes- sionall}' attend upon any Patient in any licensed House or Hospital, uidess he be directed to visit such Patient by the Person upon whose Order such Patient has been received into such licensed House or Hospital, or by the Lord Chancellor, or Her Majesty's Principal Secretary of State for the Time being for the Home Department, or by a Committee appointed by the Lord Chancellor ; and if any such Commissioner, or Visitor, or Secretary, or Clerk to the Commissioners, or Clerk or As.-: i.stant Clerk to any Visitors, shall after his Appointment be or become so interested in any House licensed for the Reception of Lunatics or the Profits of such Reception, such Commissioner, Visitor, Secretary, or Clerk, or Assistant Clerk, as the Case may be, shall immediately thereupon be disqualified from acting and shall cease to act in such Capacit}^; and if any Person, being disqualified as aforesaid, shall take the Office of Commissioner, Visitor, Secretary, Clerk, or Assistant Clerk, or, being a Commissioner, Visitor, Secretary, Clerk, or Assistant Clerk, shall become disqualified as aforesaid, and shall afterwards continue to act in such Ca[)aciiy, such Person shall be guilty of a INIisdemeanor ; and if any Physician or Surgeon (being a Commissioner), or any Physician, Surgeon, or Apothecary, (being a Visitor,) shall sign any Certificate for the Admission of any Patient into any licensed House or Hospital, or shall professionally attend any Patient in any licensed House or Hospital (except as aforesaid), such Physician, Surgeon, or Apothecary (as the Case may be) shall for each Offence against this Provision forfeit the Sum of Ten Pounds. Fourteen Days previous Notice of intended Application for and Plaii of licensed House to he given to the Commissioners or Cleric of the Peace. XXIV. And be it enacted, That every Person who shall desire to have a House licensed for the Reception of Lunatics shall give a Notice, if such House be situate within the immediate Jurisdiction of the Commissioners, to the Commis- sioners, and if elsewhere to the Clerk of the Peace for the County or Borough in which such House is situate. Fourteen clear Days at the least prior to some N 178 APPENDIX. quar'erly or other Meeting of the CommissioDers, or to some General or Quarter Sessions for such County or Borough, as the Case may be ; and such Notice shall contain the true Christian and Surname, Place of Abode, and Occupation of the Person to whom the Licence is desired to be granted, and a true and full Descrip- tion of his Estate or Interest in such House ; and in case the l^erson to whom the Licence is desired to be granted does not propose to reside himself in the licensed House, the true Christian and Suiname and Occupation of the Superintendent who is to iciside therein ; and such Notice, when given for any House which shall not have been previously licensed, sliall be accompanied by a Plan of such House, to be drawn upon a Scale of not less than One Eighth of an Inch to a Foot, with a Description of the Situation tliereof, and the Length, Breadth, and Height of and a Reference by a Figure or Letter to every Room and Apartment therein, and a Statement of tiie Quantity of Land, not covered by any Building, annexed to such House, and appropriated to the exclusive Use, Exercise, and Recreation of the Patients j)ro])osed to be received therein, and also a Statement of the Number of Patients proposed to be received into such House, and whether the Licence so applied for is for the Reception of Male or Female Patients, or of both, and if for the Recei tion of both, of the Number of each Sex proposed to be received into such House, and of the Means by which the one Sex may be kept distinct and apart from the other ; and such Notice, Plan, and Statement, when sent to the Clerk of the Peace, shall be laid by him before the Justices of the County or Borough at such Time as they shall take into their Consideration the Application for such Licence : Provided always, that it shall be lawful for any Person to whom a Licence shall be granted to remove the Superintendent named in tiie Notice, and at any Time or Times to appoint another Superintendent, upon giving a Notice containing the true Chiistian and Surname and Occupation of the new Superinten- dent to the Commissioners or the Visitors of the House, as the Case may require: Provided always, tiiat all Plans heretofoie delivered shall be deemed sufficient for the Purposes of this Act, if the Commissioners or Justices, as the Case may be, shall so think fit. No Licence to include more than O^ie House ; hut detached Buildings in certain Cases, to be considered Part of the House. XXV. And be it enacted. That no One Licence shall include or extend to more than One House ; but if there be any Place or Building detached from a House to be licensed, but not separated therefrom by Ground belonging to any other Person, and if such Place or Building be specified, delineated, and described in the Notice, Plan, and Statement herein-before required to be given, in the same Manner in all Particulars as if the same had formed Part of such House, then such detached Place or Building may be included in the Licence for the House, if the Comndssioners or Justices, as the Case may be, sliall think fit, and if so included shall be considered Part of such House for the Purposes of this Act : Provided always, that no Person hereafter receiving a Licence fur the first Time shall receive any Licence for the Reception of Lunatics in any Lunatic Asylum who shall not reside on the Premises for which he is licensed. Notice of all Additions and Alterations to he given to the Commissioners or Clerk of the Peace. XXVI. And be it enacted. That no Addition or Alteration shall be made to, in, or about, any -licensed House, or the Appurtenances, unless previous Notice in Writing of such proposed Addit on or Alteration, accompanied with a Plan of such Addition or Alteration, to be drawn ui)on the Scale aforesaid, and to be accom- panied by such Description as aforesaid, shall have been given by the Person to whom the Licence shall have been granted to the Conmiissioners or to the Clerk of the Peace, as the Case may be, and the Consent in Writing of the Commissioners, or of Two of the Visitors, as the Case may be, shall have been previously given. Untrue Statement a Misdemeanor. XXVII. And be it enacted, That if any Person shall wilfully give an untrue or incorrect Notice, Plan, Statement, or Description of any of the Things herein- APPENDIX. 179 before required to be included in any Notice, Plan, or Statement, hetihall be guilty of a Misdemeanor. A Copy of every Licence granted by Justices to be sent to the Commissioners. XXVIII. And be it enacted, That in every Case in which a Licence for the Reception of Lunatics shall nfter tlie passing of tliia Act be granted by any Justices, the Clerk of the Peace for the County or Borough shall, within Fourteen Days alter such Licence shall have been granted, send a Copy thereof to the Com- missioners ; and any Clerk of the Peace omittinuf to send such Cop^' within sach Time shall for every such Omission forfeit a Sum not exceeding Two Pounds. Every Person applying for the Renewal of a Licence to furnish a Statement of the Number and Class of Patients then detained. XXTX. And be it enacted, That in every Case in which any Person shall apply for the Renewal of a Licence already granted or hereafter to be granted, such Person, if applying to the Commissioners, shall with such Application transmit to the Commissioners, and if applying to any Justices shall witii such Application transmit to the Clerk of the Peace for the County or Borough, and also at the same Time to the Commissioners, a Statement signed by the Person so applyinsr. con- taining the Names and Number of the Patients of each or either Sex then detained in such House, and distinguishing whether such Patients respectivelv are private or pauper Patients ; and any Person who shall hereafter obtain the Ren^ wal of a Licence witliout making such Return or Returns shall for every such (Jffence forfeit the Sum of Ten Pounds ; and any Person who shall make any such Return untruly shall be guilty of a Misdemeanor. Licences to be made out in a given Form, Ac, and to be for not more than Thirteen Months. XXX. And be it ena' ted, That every Licence shall, as nearly as conveniently may be, be according to the Form in the Schedule (A.) annexed to this Act, and shall be stamped with a Ten Sliilling Stamp, and shall be under the Seal of the Commissioners, if granted by them, and if by any Justices under the Hands and Seals of Three or more such J usiices in General or Quarter Sessions assembled, and shall be granted for such Period, not exceeding Thirteen Calendar Months, as the Commissioners or Justices, as the Case may be, shall think fit. No Licence, ttc. in any Borough without Consent of Recorder. XXXI. And be it enacted, That no Licence shall be granted or Visitor or Clerk appointed by the Justices for any IJorough without the Consent in Writing of the Recorder of such Borough to such Grant or Appointment. Charge for Licences to be granted in pursuance of this Act. Power to reduce the Charge for the Licence in certain Cases. XXXII. And be it enacted. That for every Licence to be hereafter granted there shall lie paid to the Secretary of the Commissioners, or to the Clerk of the Peace, according as the Licence shall be granted by the Comraissif Ten Shillings and Two Shillings and Sixpence shall ni)t amount to Fifteen Pounds, then so much more as shall make up the Sum of Fifteen Pounds ; and no such Licence shall be delivered until tlie Sum payable for the same shall be paid : Provided always, that if the Period for which a Licence shall be granted be less than Thirteen Calendar !\Ionths, it shall bo lawful for the Commissioners or the Justices, as the Case may be, to reduce the Payment to be made on such Licence to any Sum not less than Five Pounds. 2^ 2 180 APPENDIX. ApiUcation of Monies received for Licences by the Secretary of the Commissioners. XXXIII. Aud be it enacted, That all Monies received for Licences granted by the Commissioners, and for Searches made in pursuance of the Provision for that Purpose herein-after contained, shall be retained by the Secretary of the Commis- sioners, and be applied by him in or towards the Payment of the Salaries and travelling and other Expenses of the Commissioners and ot their Secretary and Clerks, and in or towards the Payment or Discharge of all or any Costs, Charges, and Expenses incurred by or under tlie Authority of the Comnussioners in the Execu- tion of or under or by virtue of this Act. Secretary of the Commissioners to make out an annual Account, to be laid before the Lords Commissioners of the Treasury, of all Receipts and Payments by him under this Act. XXXIV. And be it enacted, That the Secretary of the Commissioners shall make out an Account of all Monies received and paid by him as aforesaid, and of all Monies otherwise received and paid by him, and of all Charges and Expenses incurred under or by virtue of or iu the Execution of this Act ; and such Account shall be made up to the First Day of August in each Year, and shall be signed by Five at least of the Commissioners ; and such Account shall specify the several Heads of Charge and Expenditure, and shall be transmitted to the Lord High Trea^^uier, or to the Commissioners of Her Majesty's Treasury, who shall thereupon audit such Account, i,nd, if he or they shall deem it expedient, direct the Balance \if any) remaining in the Hatids of the said Secretary to be paid into the Exchequer to the Account of the Consolidated Fund ; and such Accounts shall be laid before Parliament on or before the Twenty-fifth Day of March in each Year, if Parlia- ment be then sitting, or if Parliament be not then sitting then within One Month after the then next Sitting of Parliament. Balance of Payments over Receipts may be paid out of the Consolidated Fund. XXXV. And be it enacted. That it shall be lawfulfor the Lord High Treasurer, or tlie Couimissioners of Her Majesty's Treasury, or any Three or more of them, and they are hereby directed and empowered, from Time to Time (on an Applica- tion to ihem; agreed to at some quarterly or other Meeting of the Commissioners, attended by Five at least of the Commissioners, and certilied under their Hands,) to cause to be issued and paid out of the Consolidated Fund to the Secretary of the Commissioners such a Sum of Money as the Commissioners shall in such Applica- tion have certified to be requisite to pay and discharge so much of the Salaries, Costs, Charges, and Expenses herein-before directed to be paid out of the Monies received by the said Secretai-y for Licences and otherwise as aforesaid as such M<'nies shall be inadequate to pay, and the said Secretary shall thereupon apply such Ivloney in or towaids the Payment or Discharge of such Salaries, Costs, Charges, and Expenses respectively ; and that it shall be lawful for the Lord High Treasurer, or the Commissioners of Her Majesty's Treasury, or any Three or more of them, from Time to Time to advance by way of Impre.st to the said Secretary such Sum or Sums of Money as to such Lord High Treasurer or Commissioners of Her Majesty's Treasury may appear requisite and reasonable, for or towards the Payment or Discharge of all or any such Salaries, Costs, Charges, or Expenses as aforesaid, such Sum or Sums to be accounted for by the said Secre- tary in his then next Account. Application 0/ Monies received for Licences by Clerks of the Peace. XXXVI. And be it enacted, That all Monies to be received for Licences granted by any Justices shall be apjilied by the Clerk of the Peace for the County or Borough in or towards the Payment of the Salary or Remuneration of the Clerk to the Visitors ibr such County or Borough, and in or towards the Remuneration of such ol the same Visitors as are herein-before directed to be remunerated, and in or towards the Payment or Discharge of all Costs, Charges, and Expenses in- curred by or under the Autlmrity of the same Justice or Visitors in the Execution of or under or by virtue of this Act. APPENDIX. 181 Clerics of the Peace to maJce out annual Accounts, to be laid before the Justices in Sessions, of all Receipts and Payments made under this Act. XXXVII. And be it enacted, Tliat the Clerk of the Peace for every County or Borough shall keep an Account of all Monies received and paid hy him aa afore- said, and of all Monies otherwise received or paid by him under or by virtue of or in the execution of this Act ; and such Account shall respectively be made up to the First D-d,y of A ufjust in each Year, and shall be signed by Two at least of the Visitors for the County or Borough ; and every such Account shall be laid by the Clerk of the Peace before the Justices at the Michaelmas General or Quarter Sessions, who shall thereujion direct the Balance (if any) remaining in the Hands of the Clerk of the Peace to be paid into the Hands of the Treasurer for sucii County or Borough, in aid and as I'art of the County or Borough Rate. Balance of Payments over Receipts may be paid out of the Fund of the County or Borough. XXXVIII. And be it enacted, That it shall be lawful for the Justices for any County or Borough, in General or Quarter Sessions assembled, if they shall think fit, to order to be paid to the Clerk of the Peace of such County or Borough, out of the Rates or Funds thereof, such Sum or Sums of Money as they shall on Examination deem to be necessary to pay and discharge so much of the ,S:dary, Remuneration, Costs, Charges, and Expenses berein-before directed to be p:uion Booh," in which a weehhj Entry is to be made, showing the Condition of the House and of the Patients. LIX. And be it enacted, That every Physician, Surgeon, or Apothecary, where there shall be only One, keeping or residini; in or visiting any licensed House or any Hosjiital, and where there shall be Two or more Pliy>-icians, Surireons, or Apothecaries keeping or residing in or visiting any licensed House or any Hospital, then One at least of such Physicians, Surgeons, or Apothecaries, shall once in every Week (or, in the t.'ase of any House at which Visits at more distant Intervals than once a Week are permitted, on every Visit), enter and sign in a Book to be kept at such House or Hospital for that Purpose, to be called " The Medical Visita- tion Book," a lleport, showing the Date thereof, and also the Number, Sex, and State of Health of all the Patients then in such Hou^ie or Hospital, the Chrisliaa and Surname of every Patient who shall have been under Restraint, or in Seclu- sion, or under Medical Treatment, since the Date of the last preceding Report, the Condition of the House or Hospital, and every Death, Injury, and Act of Violence which shall have happened to or affected any Patient since the then last preceding Report, according to the Form in Schedule (H.) annexed to this Act ; and every such Pliysician, Surgeon, or Apothecai-y who shall omit to enter or sign such Report as aforesaid shall for every such Omission forfeit and pay the Sum of Twenty Pounds ; and every such Physician, Surgeon, or Apothecary who shall in any such Report as aforesaid enter anything untruly shall be guilty of a Misdemeanor. A Medical Case Booh to be hept. LX. And be it enacted. That there shall be kept in every licensed House and in every Hospital a Book to be called "The Case Book," in which the Physician, Surgeon, or Apothecary keeping or residing in or visiting such House or Hospital shall from Time to Titne make Entries of the ment il State and bodily Condition of each Patient, together with a correct Description of the Medicine and other Remedies prescribed for the Treatment of his Disorder ; and that it shall be lawful for the Commissioners from Time to Time, by any Order under their Common Seal, to direct the Form in which such Case liook shall be kept by such Physician, Surgeon, or Apothecary ; and immediately after a Copy of such Order shall have been transmitted by the Secretary of the Commissioners to such Physi- cian, Surgeon, or Apothecary ; such Physician, Surgeon, or Apothecary shall thereupon keep such Case Book in the Form vvliich shall be directed by such Order ; and that it shall be lawful for the Commissioners (whenever tiiey shall see tit) to recjuire, by an Order in Writing under their Common Seal, such Physician, Surgeon, or Apothecary to transmit to the Commissioners a correct Copy of the Entries or Entry in any Case Book kept under the Provisions of th s Act, rela- tive to the Case of any Lunatic who is or may have been confined in any such licensed House or Hospital ; and every such Physician, Surgeon, or Apothecary who shall neglect to keep the said Case Book, or to keep the same ac ording to the Form directed by the Commissioners, or to transmit a ('opy of the said Entry or Entries, pursuant to such Order or Orders as aforesaid, shall for every such Neglect forfeit any Sum not exceeding Ten I'ouuds. 188 APPENDIX. All licensed Mouses and Hospitals to be visited by the Commissioners. LXT. And be it enacted, That every licensed House shall, without any pre- vious Notice, be visited b^' Two at least of the Commissioners (one of whom shall be a Physician or Surgeon, and the other a Barrister), Four Times at the least in every Year, if such House shall be within the immediate Jurisdiction of the Commissioners, and if not, twice at least in every Year ; and every Hospital in which Lunatics shall be received shall, without any previous Notice, be visited by Two at least of the said Connnissioners, (one of whom shall be a Physician or Surgeon, and the other a Barrister), once at least in every Year ; and every such Visit shall be made on such Day or Days, and at such Hours of the Day, and for such Length of Time as the Visiting Commissioners shall think fit, and also at such other Times (if any) as the said Commissioners in Lunacy shall direct ; and such Visiting Commissioners, when visiting such House or Hos[>ital, may and shall inspect every Part of such House or Hospital, and every Outhouse, Place, and Building communicating with such House or Hospital, or detached therefrom, but not separated by Ground belonging to any other Person, and every Part of the Ground or Appurtenances held, used, or occupied therewith, and see every Patient then confined in such House or Hospital, and inquire whether any Patient is under Restraint, and why, and inspect the Order and Certificates or Certificate for the Reception of every Patient who shall have been received into such House or Hospital since the last Visit of the Commissioners, and in the Case of any House licensed by Justices shall consider the Observations made in the Visitors Book for such House by the Visitors appointed by the Justices, and enter in the Visitors Book of such House or Hospital a Minute of the then Condition of the House or Hospital, and of the Patients therein, and the Number of Patients under Restraint, with the Reasons thereof, as stated, and such Irregularity (if any) as may exist in any such Order or Certificates as aforesaid, and also whether the previous Suggestions (if any) of the Visiting Commissioners or Visitors have or have not been attended to, and any Observations which they may deem proper as to any of the Matters aforesaid or otherwise, and also, if such Visit be the first after the granting a Licence to the House, shall examine such Licence, and if the same be in conformity with the Provisions of this Act, sign the same, but if it be informal enter in such Visitors Book in what respect such Licence is informal : Provided also, that it shall be lawful for the Lord Chancellor, on a Representation by the Commissioners setting forth the Expediency of such Alteration, by any Writing under his Hand, to direct that any House licensed by Justices shall (during such Period as he shall therein specify, or until such his Direction shall be revoked), be visited by the Commissioners once only in the Year, and also to direct that any House licensed by the Commissioners, and not receiving any Pauper Patients therein, shall (during such Period as he shall therein specify, or until such his Direction shall be revoked), be visited by the Commissioners twice only in the Year. Licensed Houses not within the immediate Jurisdiction of the Commissioners to be inspected Four Times a Year at least by the Visitors. LXII. And be it enacted. That every licensed House within the Jurisdiction of any Visitors appointed by Justices shall be visited by Two at least of the said Visitors (one of wliom shall be a Physician, Surgeon, or Apothecary,) Four Times at the least in every Year, on such Days, and at such Hours in the Day, and for such Length of Time as the said Visitors shall think fit, and also at such other Times (if any) as the Justices by whom such House shall have been licensed shall direct ; and such Visitors when visiting any such House may and shall inspect every Part of such House, and every House, Outhouse, Place, and Building com- municating therewith or detached therefrom, but not separated by Ground belonging to any other Person, and every Part of the Ground or Appurtenances held, used, or occupied therewith, and see every Patient then confined therein, and inquire whether any Patient is under Restraint, and why, and inspect the Order and Certificates or Certificate for the Reception of every Patient who shall have been received into such House since the last Visit of the Visitors, and enter in the APPENDIX. 189 Visitors Book a Minute of the then Condition of the House, of the Patients therein, and the Number of Patients under Restraint, with the Reasons thereof as stated, and such Irregularity (if any) as may exist in any such Order or Certificates as aforesaid, and also whether the previous Suggestions (if any) of the Visitors or Visiting Commi^s8ioners have or have not been attended to, and any Observations which they may deem proper as to any of the Matters aforesaid or otherwise. The Proprietor or Superintendent of every House and Hospital to shoiv every Part and every Patient to the Visiting Commissioners and Visitors. LXIII. And be it enacted, That the Proprietor or Superintendent of every licensed House or Hospital shall show to the Commissioners and Visitors respec- tively visiting the same every Part thereof respectively, and every Person detained therein as a Lunatic ; and every Proprietor or Superintendent of any licensed House or any Hospital who shall conceal or attempt to conceal, or shall refuse or wilfully neglect to show, any Part of such House or Hospital, or any House, Outhouse, Place, or Building communicating therewith or detached therefrom, but not separated as aforesaid, or any Part of the Ground or Appur- tenances held, used, or occupied therewith, or any Person detained or being therein from any Visiting Commissioners or Visitors, or from any Person authorized under any Power or Provision of this Act to visit and inspect such House or Hospital, or the Patients confined therein or any of them, shall be guilty of a Misdemeanor. Inquiries to be made by the Commissioners and Visitors on their several Visitations, LXIV. And be it enacted, That the Visiting Commissioners and Visitors respectively, upon their seventl Visitations to every licensed House and to every Hospital, shall inquire when Divine Service is performed, and to what Number of the Patients, and the Effect thereof ; and also what Occupations or Amusements are provided for the Patients, and the Result thereof; and whether there has been adopted any System of Non-coercion, and, if so, the Result thereof ; and also as to the Classification of Patients ; and also as to the Condition of the Pauper Patients (if any) when first received ; and also as to the Dietary of the Pauper Patients (if any) ; and shall also make such other Inquiries as to such Visiting Commissionei's or Visitors shall seem expedient; and every Pro[)rietor or Superintendent of a licensed House or an Hospital who shall not give full and true Answers to the best of his Knowledge to all Questions which the Visiting Commissioners and Visitors respec- tively shall ask in reference to the INIatters aforesaid shall be guilty of a Misdemeanor. Books and Documents to be produced to Visiting Commissioners and Visitors. LXV. And be it enacted. That upon every Visit of the Visiting Commissioners to any licensed House or to any Hospital, and upon every Visit of the Visitors to any licensed House, there shall be laid before such Visiting Commissioners or Visitors (as the Case may be), by the Proprietor or Superintendent of such licensed House or of such Hospital, a List of all the Patients then in such House or Hospital (distinguishing Pauper Patients from otht r Patients, and Males from Females and specifying such as are deemed curable), and also the several Books by this Act required to be kept by the Proprietor or Superintendent and by the Meotliecary shall be One), and such Visitors shall thereupon immediately visit such Patient and act as they shall see fit ; and every such Proprietor or Superintendent who shall omit to send a true and ]ierfect Copy, as hereinbefore directed, of every or any such last-mentioned Minute, and every Clerk who shall neglect to communicate the same to Two of the Visitors as afore- said, shall be guilty of a Misdemeanor. APPENDIX. 191 Visiting Commissioners to report on every House and Hospital not within their immediate Jurisdiction. LXIX. And be it enacted, That the Visiting Commissioners aluU after every Visitation liy them to every liceii.sf;d House not being within their immediate Jurisdiction, and to every Hospital, report in Writing tiie general Result of their Inspection thereof (together with such special Circumstances, if any, as they may deem proper to notice), to the Commissioners, and the Secretary of the Commis- sioners shall thereupon enter the same in a Book to be kept for that Purpose. Power for the Commissioners or any Five of them to make Rules. LXX. And be it enacted, Tiiat it shall be lawful for the Commissioners or any Five of them, at any Quarterly or Sjiecial Meedng, by any Resolution or Resolutions under their Common Seal, or to he et)tereccept of a licensed House within their Jurisdiction. The Person who signed the Order for the Reception of a private Patient may order his Discharge or Removal. LXXII. And be it enacted. That if and when any Person who signed the Order on which any Patient (not being a Pauper) was received into any licensed House or into any Hospital shall by Writing under his Hand direct that such Patient shall be discharged or removed, then and in such Case such Patient shall forthwith be discharged or removed, as the Person who signed the Order for his Reception shall direct. Provision for the Discharge of a private Patient lohen the Person who signed the Order for his Reception is incapable. LXXIII. And be it enacted, That if the Person who signed the Order on ■which any Patient (not being a Pauper) was received into anj' licensed House or into any Hospital be incapable by reason of Insanity or Absence from England, or otherwise, of giving an Order for the Discharge or Removal of such Patient, or if such Person be dead, then and in any of such Cases the Husband or Wife of such Patient, or if there be no such llusbaml or Wife, the Father of such Patient, or if there be no Father, the Mother of such Patient, or if there be no Mother, then any one of the nearest of Kin for the Time being of such Patient, or the Person who made the last Payment on account of such Patient, may by any Writing under his or her Hand give such Direction as aforesaid for the Discharge or Re- moval of such Patient, and thereupon such Patient shall be forthwith discharged or removed as the Person giving such Direction shall direct. Mode of Removal or Discharge of Pauper Patients. LXXIV. And be it enacted, Tli;it tlie Guardians of any Parish or Union may by a Minute of their Board, or an Officiating Clergyman of any Parish not under 192 APPENDIX. a Board of Guardians, and One of the Overseers thereof, or any Two Justices of the County or Borough in which such last-mentioned Parish is situate, may by Writing under the Hands respectively of such Clergyman and Overseer or of such Justices direct that any Pauper Patient belonging to such Parish or Union, and detained in any licensed House or any Hospital, shall be discharged or removed therefrom, and may direct the Mode of such Discharge or Removal ; and if a Copy of such Minute or such Writing be produced to the Proprietor or Superin- tendent of such licensed House or such Hospital, he shall forthwith discharge or remove such Patient, or cause or suffer such Patient to be discharged or removed accordingly. No Patient to be removed under any of the preceding Powers if certified to he dangerous, unless the Commissioners or Visitors consent, or for the Purpose of Transfer to som-e other Asylum. LXXV. Provided always, nevertheless, and be it enacted. That no Patient shall be discharged or removed, under any of the Powers herein-before contained, from any licensed House or any Hospital, if the Physician, Surgeon, or Apothecary by whom the same shall be kept, or who shall be the regular Medical Attendant thereof, shall by Writing under his Hand certify that in his Opinion such Patient is dangerous and unfit to be at large, together with the Grounds on which such Opinion is founded, unless the Commissioners visiting such House or the Visitors of such House shall, after such Certificate sliall have been produced to them, give their Consent in Writing that such Patient shall be discharged or removed ; provided that nothing herein contained sliall prevent any Patient from being trans- ferred from any licensed House or any Hospital to any other licensed House or any other Hos[)ital, or to any Asylum, but in such Case every such Patient shall be placed under the Control of an Attendant belonging to the licensed House, Hospital, or Asylum, to or from which he shall be about to be removed for the Purpose of such Removal, and shall remain under such Control until such Time as such Removal shall be duly effected. Commissioners may discharge any Patient confined in a House licensed by themselves. LXXVI. And be it enacted, That it shall be lawful for any Two or more of the Commissioners to make Visits to any Patient detained in any House licensed by the Commissioners, on such Daj's and at such Hours as they shall think fit ; and if after Two distinct and separate Visits so made (Seven Days at least to intervene between such Visits) it shall appear to such Visiting Commissioners that such Patient is detained without sufficient Cause, it shall be lawful for the Com- missioners if they shall think fit, to make such Order as to the Commissioners shall seem meet for the Discharge of such Patient, and such Patient shall be discharged accordingly. Two Commissioners may make special Visits to Discharge any Patient confined in a House licensed by Justices or in an Hospital. LXXVII. And be it enacted. That it shall be lawful for any Two or more of the Conmiissioners, of whom One shall be a Physician and One a Barrister, to make special Visits to any Patient detained in any Hours licensed by the Justices or in any Hospital, on such Days and at such Hours as they shall think fit ; and if after Two distinct and separate Visits so made it shall appear to such Visiting Commissioners that such Patient is detained without sufficient Cause, they may make such Order as to them shall seem meet for the Discharge of such Patient, and such Patient shall be discharged accordingly. Similar Powers for Two Visitors as to Houses within their Jurisdiction. LXXVIII. And be it enacted, That it shall be lawful for any Two or more of the Visitors of any licensed House, of whom One shall be a Physician, Surgeon, or Apothecary, to make special Visits to any Patient detained in such House, on such Days and at such Hours as they shall think fit ; and if after Two distinct APPENDIX. 19*} and separate Visits so made it shall appear to such Visitors that such Patient is detained without sufficient Cause, they may make such Onkr as to them shall seem meet for the Discharge of such Patient, and such Patient shall be discharged accordingly. Every Order for the Discliarf/e of a Patient under the last preceding Powers to be signed by the Persons exercising them, and to be subject to certain Restrictions. LXXIX. Provided always, and be it enacted, That every such Order by any Commissioners or Visitors for the Discharge of a Patient from any House licensed by Justices, or from any Hospital, shall be signed by them, and that each of such special V^isitsshall be by the same Commissioners or Visitors; and that it shall not be lawful for such Commissioners or Visitors to Order the Discharge of any Patient from any such last-mentioned House or Hospital without having previously, if the Medical Attendant of such House or Hospital shall have tendered himself for that Purpose, examined him as to his Opinion respecting the Fitness of such Patient to be discharged; and if such Commissioners or Visitors shall, after so examining such Medical Attendant discharge such Patient, and such Medical Attendant shall furnish them with any Statement in Writing containing his Reasons against the Discharge of such Patient, they shall forthwith transmit such Statement to the Com- missioners or to the Clerk of the Visitors, as the Case may require, to be kept and registered in a Book for that Purpose. The last preceding Powers to be exercised under certain other Restrictions. LXXX. Provided also, and be it enacted, That not less than Seven Days shall intervene between the First and Second of such special Visits ; and that such Commissioners or Visitors shall, Seven Days previously to the Second of such special Visits, give Notice thereof, either by Post or by an Entry in the Patients Book, to the Proprietor or Superintendent of the House licensed by Justices or of the Hospital in which the Patient intended to be visited is detained ; and that such Proprietor or Superintendent shall forthwith, if possible, transmit by Post a Copy of such Notice, in the Case of a Patient not being a Pauper, to the Person by whose Authority such Patient was received into such House or by whom the last Payment on account of such Patient was made, and in the Case of a Pauper to the Guardians of his Parisii or Union, or if there be no such Guardians, to One of the Overseers for the Tiuie being of his Parish, and also in the Case of any Patient detained in a House licensed by Justices, to the Clerk of the Visitors of such House. Preceding Powers not to extend to Persons found lunatic by Inquisition, or confined under Authority of Secretary of State. LXXXI. Provided always, nevertheless, and be it enacted. That none of the Powers of Discharge hereiu-before contained shall extend to any Person who shall liave been found lunatic by Inquisition or under any Inquiry directed by the Lord Chancellor, in pursuance of the Powers in that Behalf herein-after given to him, nor to any Lunatic confined under any Order or Authority of Her Majesty's Principal Secretary of State for the Home Department, or under the Order of any Court of Criminal Jurisdiction. Poiver for Visitors and Visiting Commissioners to regulate the Dietary of Pauper Pa'icnts. LXXXII. And be it enacted, That it shall be lawful for the Visitors of any licensed House at any Time to determine and regulate the Dietary of the Pauj>er Patients therein ; and that it shall be lawful fc>r the Visiting Commissioners at any Time to determine and regulate the Dietivry of the Pauper Patients in any licensed House or in any Hospital ; and that if such Determination and Kegulation of anj- Visitors and of the Visiting Commissioners shall not agree with each other, then the Determination and Regulation of the Visiting Commissioners shall be followed : Provided always, nevertheless, that every such Regulation shall be made to take O 194 APPENDIX. effect only from such Time as not to affect any Contract existing on the First Day of June last for the Maintenance of Pauper Patients before the First Day of June One thousand eight hundred and forty-six, or the Expiration of such Contract, whichever shall first happen. Potvcr for any Visitor to give an Order to the ClerJc of the Visitors to search and (jive Information. LXXXIII. And be it enacted, That if any Person shall apply to any Visitor in order to be informed whether any particular Person is confined in any licensed House within the Jurisdiction of such Visitor, the said Visitor, if he shall tliink it reasonable to permit such Inquiry to be made, shall sign an Order to the Clerk of the Visitors, and the said Clerk shall, on Receipt of such Order, and on Payment to him of a Sura not exceeding Seven Shillings for his Trouble, make search ainong,-H H Oh a H o rO w 1— 1 O H « •snonBAiasqo | ■paia 1 1 Q •pBAOjduunoii •paADipa j •pajaAODag ^ •- ■q?T!3a 1 JO aSiBipsiQ jo a^L'd CD ^ .. 00 in ;: •JIOBJJV jsjijuo aSv 1 t- • ■s>taB«v 1 snoiAajd.jo jaqainfj 1 IN « ■* Q<«<1 •snaaM •sqiuofti •STO8j^ •s|oipx [ujiu^unj •SDijclaiidji I JO astitjo pasoddtig •japjo -81(1 ic^napj JO m.10 J •(^UT!J!) jap.iostd JO aaiBfj •notjipuDO ^nPOST ! 'pau3is luoqAV Aq pire 'saiuoyii -aaojBa]p9M p s.i-jjg^ •^uas ^}iaoqinV asoqM Xg ■aiq^aajiiq.! HOtqAV o; qsuBj ao 'uoiufi 'iijunoQ^ •apoqv JO aoEjj snoiA^jj ■uoiiBdnoDo snouajd puB 'ajii JO noi^ipnoo 3 Pi •paMoptAV ■ai^mg •pauiT!i\[ •aSy •aoiBsiaipY jo ajBQ 2 2 00 ci •uoissiuipv 10 j^p.TO "T ""NT (XUB J!) uoisHtiupv snouaj'd isn'i j'o aiBQ APPENDIX. 209 SCHEDULE (F.) Section 52. Notice of Admission. I HEREBY give you Notice, That A.B. was received into tliis House [or Hospi- tal] as a Private [or Pauper] Patient on tiie Day of and I hereby transmit a Copy of tiie Order and Medical Certificates [or Certificate] on whicli lie was received. Subjoined is a Statement with respect to the mental and bodily Condition of the above-named Patient. (Signed) Superintendent [or Proprietor] of One thousand Dated this eight hundred and Day of Statement, I have this Day seen and personally examined the Patient named in the above Notice, and hereby certify that with respect to mental State he [or she] and that with respect to bodily Health and Condition he [or she] (Signed) Medical Proprietor [or Superin- tendent, or Attendant]. Dated this Day of One thousand eight hundred and SCHEDULE (G. 1.) Section 54. Registeb of Discharges and Deaths. 1 13 < Q Cm o 1 ^ o 55 i a ■r. a .§« Sex and Class. Discharged. Assipned Cause of Death. .2"S So Private. Pauper. Reco- vered. r}„T,^„^A Notim- Eeheved. p^^^^^j Died. Deatii. 5 c5 t ° M. F. M. F, M. F. M. F. M. F. M. F. M. F. 1816: Sept. 1 1846: Jan. 3 1 William Johnson . . 1 . 1 1848: Dec. 2 1848: June 9 4 William Johnson . . 1 - 1 1853: Junes 1852: May 6 7 WiUiam Johnson ■ 1 - - - - - - - 1 Phthisis 27 SCHEDULE (G. 2.) Section 54. Form of Notice of Discharge or Death. I hereby give you Notice, That received into this House [or Hospital] on the a Private [or Pauper] Patient, Day of waa 210 APPENDIX. discharcred therefrom recovered [or relieved, or not improved,] by the Authority of ° \or died therein, on the Day ot J. (Signed) Superintendent {or Proprietor] of House [or Hospi- tal] at Day of One thousand eight hundred Dated this and In case of Death, add Death of the said said •and I further certify that 4.J5. was present at the ; and that the apparent Cause of Death of the [ascertained by post mortem examination {if so)] SCHEDULE (H.) Section 59. Form of Medical Journal and Weekly Report. Number of Patients. Private. Pauper. M. F M. F. Names of Patients under Restraint (and by what Means) or in Seclusion. Males. Females Names of Patients under Medical Treatment. Males. Females, Eeport on State of Health of Patients and Con- dition of House or Hospital. Deaths, Injuries, and Violences to Patients. SCHEDULE (I.) Section 100. Form of Summons. We, the Commissioners in Lunacy [or we whose Names are hereunto set and Seals affixed, being Two of the Commissioners in Lunacy, or Visitors] appointed under or by virtue of an Act passed in the Year of the Reign of Her present Majesty, intituled [here insert the Title of the Act\ do hereby summon and require you personally to appear before us at in the Parish of in the County of on next the Day of at the Hour of in ^Ijg noon of the same Day, and then and there to be examined, and to testify the Truth touching certain Matters relating to the Execution of the said Act. . , r • Sealed with the Common Seal of " The Commssioners in Lunacy' [or given under our Hands and Seals], this Day of in the Year of our Lord One thousand eight hundred and APPENDIX. 211 ANNO DECIMO SEXTO & DECIMO SEPTIMO VICTORIA REGIN^. CAP. XCVI. An Act to amend an Act passed in the Ninth Year of Her Majesty, " for the Regulation of the Care and Treatment of Lunatics." [20th August 185.';.] 8 ct- 9 Vict. c. 100. WHEREAS an Act was passed in the Ninth Year of Her Majesty, " for the Regulation of the Care and Treatment of Lunatics :" And wliereas it is ex- pedient to amend the said Act as herein-after mentioned : Be it therefore enacted by the Queen's most Excellent Majesty, by and with tlie Advice and Consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the Authority of the same, as follows : Section 25 of recited Act repealed, and Provision as to what may be included in One Licence. I. Section Twenty-five of the said recited Act shall be repealed, and any One Licence to be granted for the Reception of Lunatics may, in the Discretion of the Commissioners or Justices granting such Licence, include Two or more Houses belonging to One Proprietor or to Two or more joint Proprietors, provided that no One of such Houses be separated from the other or others of tliera otherwise than by Land in the same Occupation, and by a Road, or by either of such Modes ; and all Houses, Buildings, and Lands intended to be included in any Licence shall be specified, delineated, and described in the Plan required by Section Twenty-four of the said recited Act. The Person or One of tlie Persons receiving a Licence to reside on the Premises. II. No Person having, after the passing of the said recited Act, received for the First Time a Licence for the Reception of Lunatics, or hereafter receiving for the First Time such Licence, shall receive a Licence unless he shall reside on the Pre- mises licensed ; and no Two or more Persons having after the passing of the said recited Act received for the First Time a joint Licence for the Reception of Luna- tics, or hereafter receiving for the First Time such Licence, shall receive such Licence unless they or One of them shall reside on the Premises licensed. Sections 45, 4G, 47, 48, and 49 o/8 tfc 9 Vict. c. 100, repealed. III. Sections Forty-five, Forty-six, Forty-seven, Forty-eight, and Forty-nine of the said recited Act shall be repealed ; but such Repeal shall not prevent or defeat any Prosecution for any Offence committed before the commencement of this Act, and every such Offence shall and may be prosecuted, and every pending Prose- cution continued, as if this Act had not been passed. No Person not a Pauper to be received into a Hospital or licensed House without a certain Order and Certificates. IV. Save as herein-after otherwise provided, no Person (not being a Lunatic) for or in respect of whom any Money shall be paid or .agreed to be paid shall be boarded or lodged in any licensed House ; and, save where otherwise i)rovided or authorized under this or any other Act, no Person (not being a Pauper) shall be received as a Lunatic into any licensed House or Hospital without an Order under the Hand of some Person according to the Form in Schedule (A.) No. 1. annexed to this Act, together with such Statement of Particulars as is contained in the.«anie Schedule, nor without the Medical Certificates, according to the Form in Schedule p 2 pi 2 APPENDIX. (A.) No. 2. annexed to this Act, of two Persons, each of whom shall be a Physician, Surgeon, or Apotliecaiy, and shall not be in Partnership with or an Assistant to the other, and each of whom shall separately from the other have personally examined the Person to whom the Certificate signed by him relates not more than Seven clear Days previously to the Reception of such Person into such House or Hos- pital ; and such Order as aforesaid may be signed before or after the Medical Certifi- cates or either of them ; and every Person who shall receive any such Person as aforesaid into any such House or Hospital as afoiesaid (save where otherwise provided or authorized under this or any other Act) without such Order and Medical Certificates as aforesaid shall be guilty of a Misdemeanor. Proviso that in certain Cases any Person may he received on a Certificate signed by One Medical Practitioner only. V. Provided always, That any Person (not a Pauper) may, under special Cir- cumstances preventing the Examination of such Person by Two Medical Practi- tioners as aforesaid, be received as a Lunatic into any licensed House or any Hos- pital upon such Order as aforesaid, and with the Certificate of one Physician, Surgeon, or Apothecary alone, provided that the Statement accompanying such Order set forth the special Circumstances which prevent the Examination of such Person by Two Medical Practitioners ; but in everj' such Case Two other such Certificates shall, within Three clear Days after his Reception into such House or Hospital, be signed by Two other Persons, each of whom shall be a Physician, Surgeon, or Apothecary, not in Partnersliip with or an Assistant to the other or the Physician, Surgeon, or Apothecary who signed the Certificate on which the Patient was received, and not connected with such House or Hospital, and shall within such Time and separately from the other of them have personally examined the Person so received as a Lunatic ; and every Person who, having received any Per- son as a Lunatic into any House or Hospital as aforesaid upon the Certificate of One Medical Practitioner alone as aforesaid, shall keep or permit such Person to remain in such House or Hospital beyond the said Period of Three clear Days without such further Certificates as aforesaid, shall be guilty of a Misdemeanor. Any Person discharged may, with Assent of Visitors or Commissioners, be retained in licensed House, and a Relative or Friend may, with like Assent, he received therein. VI. Provided also, That it shall be lawful for the Proprietor or Superintendent of any licensed House, with the previous Assent in Writing of Two of the Commis- sioners, such Assent not to be given until after such Commissioners have, by personal Examination of the Patient, satisfied themselves of his Desire to remain, to entertain and keep in such House as a Boarder any Person who may have been discharged as a Patient from such House for such Time after such Discharge as he may desire to remain, not exceeding the Time specified in such Assent, and also, for the Benefit of any Patient in such House, and with the previous Assent in Writing of Two of the Commissioners, to receive and accommodate as a Boarder therein, for a Time to be specified in the Assent, any Relative or Friend of such Patient, and any Two of the Commissioners may from Time to Time, by any Writ- ing under their Hands, extend or i-evoke any such Assent as aforesaid ; and every such Patient so retained after Dischaige, and every such Relative or Frieml so accommodated, shall, if required, be produced to the Commissioners and Visitors respectively at their respective Visits. Paupers not to be received without a certain Order and Certificate. VII. Save where otherwise p)rovided or authorized under any Act, no Pauper shall be received into any licensed House or any Hospital without an Order accord- ing to the Form in Schedule (B.) No. 1. annexed to this Act, under the Hand of One Justice, or under the Hands of an Officiating Clergyman, and the Relieving Officer or One of tlie Overseers of the Union or Parish from which such Pauper shall be sent, together with such Statement of Particulars as is contained iu the APPENDIX. 213 same Scliedule, nor without tlie Medical Certificate, according to the Form in Scliedule (B.) Is'o. 2. annexed to this Act, of a I'liysician, Surgeon, or Ajwthecary, who shall iiave personally examined the Pauper to whom it relates not more than Seven clear Days previously to his Reception ; and every Person who siiall receive any Pauper into any such House or Hospital as aforesaid (save where otherwise provided or authorized under any Act) without such Order and Medical Certificate as last aforesaid shall be guilty of a Misdemeanor : Provided always, that this Enactment shall not by Implication or otherwise give any Power or Authority to make such Order, or extend, alter, or affect any Power or Authority expressly* given by any Act to any Justice, OflSciating Clergyman, Relieving Officer or Overseer to make or join in making any such Order, or any Provisions giving or relating to such Power or Authority. The like Order and Certificates for Reception of a single Patient as for Reception of a private Patient into a licensed House. VIII. Where, under Section Ninety of the said recited Act, the like Order and Medical Certificates are required on the Reception or taking the Charge or Care of any One Person as a Lunatic or alleged Lunatic as are therein-before required on the Reception of a Patient (not being a Pauper) into a licensed House, the like Order and Medical Certificates (in lieu of those required as first aforesaid) shall hereafter be required on the Reception or takiug the Charge or Care of any such Person as are by this Act required on the Reception of a Patient (not being a Pauper) into a licensed House. Penalty on Officers, ands or Buildings, in consideration of a yearly Rentcharge or annual Sum to be limited to such Person, his Heira and Assigns, or as he or they shall direct, out of the Lands or Buildings to be purchased, and the same shall accordingly be conveyed as aforesaid, subject thereto, and to Powers of Distress and Eutry for securing the same. Power for Visitors to take a Lease for Rent. XXXIII. It shall be lawful for any Committee of Visitors, instead of purchasing any Land or Buildings which they are hereby authorized to purch.ise, to take a Lease thereof for any absolute Term of not less than Sixty Years, at such annual Rfiit and under such Covenants as the said Committee of Visitors think fit : and it shall also be lawful for such Committee to rent any Land by the Year for the Purpose of employing such of the Inmates of the Asylum as maj be tit for such Employment, or otherwise for the Occupation and Use of the Patieuta. 236 APPENDIX. Asylum may be erected beyond the Limits of any County or Borough, and Justices of such County or Borouyh may notwithstanding act therein. XXXIV. The Asylum to be provided for any County or Borough either solely or jointly, may be without the Limits of such County or Borough, and when any Asylum provided or to be provided solely or in part for any County or Borough, or any Part of such Asylum, is situate within the Limits of any other County or Borough, then and in every such Case the Justices of the County or Borough to •which such Asylum wholly or partly belongs shall have full Power and Autliority to act in such other County or Borough, so far as concerns the Regulation of such Asylum, and the Powers conferred by this Act, in the like Manner as if such Asylum and every Part thereof were situate within such first-mentioned County or Borough. Assessment to local Rates not to he increased after Purchases for the Purposes of this or any former Act. XXXV. No Lands or Buildings already or to be hereafter purchased or acquired, under the Provisions of any former Act or this Act, for the Purposes of any Asylum, (with or without any additional Building erected or to be erected thereon,) shall while used for such Purposes be assessed to any County, Parochial, or other local Kates at a higher Value or more improved Rent than the Value or Rent at which the same were assessed at the Time of such Purchase or Ac- quisition. Certain Provisions 0/ 8 <& 9 Vict. c. 18. incorporated, and extended authorize Exchanges. XXXVI. The Provisions of " The Lands Clauses Consolidation Act, 1845," "with respect to the Purchase of Lands by Agreement," " with respect to the Purchase Money or Compensation coming to Parties having limited Interests, or prevented from" treating, or not making Title," and all other Provisions of the said Act applicable to and in the Case of the Purchase of Lands by Agreement, shall be incorporated with this Act ; and all Parties by the said Provisions ern- powered to sell any Lands may give Lands in exchange for the Purposes of this Act for other Lands, and enter into all necessary Agreements for that Purpose, and on any such Exchange Money may be paid by either Party by way of Equality of Exchange, and the said "Provisions " with respect to Purchase Money or Compensation coming to Parties having limited Interests, or prevented from treating, or not making Title," shall apply to any Money coming to any such Parties on any such Exchange ; and any Lands to be purchased or taken in exchange for the Purposes of this Act shall be conveyed to such Persons, being not less than Five in Number, and in such Manner as the Committee of Visitors purchasing tlie same or taking the same in exchange may direct, in trust for the Purposes of this Act ; and any Conveyance to be so made shall have the like Force and Effect as a Conveyance made under Section Eighty-one of the said Lands Clauses Consolidation Act. Provision for the Appointment of new Triistees of Land purchased or acquired for Asylum. XXXVII. When and so often as any Land purchased or acquired under this Act or any former Act, for the Purposes of an Asylum, shall be vested in less than Three Trustees, or there shall not be any Trustee thereof living, it shall be lawful for ihe Committee of Visitors of such Asylum, or any Three or more of them, by an Instrument in Writing under the Hands of such Visitors or any Three or more of them, to appoint such Number of new Trustees of such Land as such Visitors may think fit ; and such Appointment shall be deposited and kept among the Records of the C(junty or Borough, or, wheie more than One County or Borough is interested in such Land, then among tlie Records of the County or Borough having the largest Interest therein ; and all the Estate and Interest in such Land which at the Time of such Appointment may be vested in any Trustee or Trustees, APPENDIX. 237 in trust for the Purposes aforesaid, or in any other Person, as Heir, or Devisee, or otherwise, suliject to sucli Trust, sliall by virtue of such Appointment vest in the Trustees so appointed, eitlier alone, or if tliere be any continuing Trustees or Trusteejointly with such continuing Trustees or Trustee, as tlie Case may require, without any Conveyance or Assignment for that Purpose, Visitors to order all ordinary Repairs of Asylums, provided they do not exceed 400L per Annum. As to Payment of Expenses of liepairs, d:c. No Order for Pay- ment of Money exceeding \OQl. to he made unless Notice has been given of the Meeting at which the same shall be ordered. XXXVIII. The Committee of Visitors of every Asylum may of their own Authority from Tirue to Tune order all sucli ordinary Repairs as may be necessary for such Asylum, and any Additions, Alterations, or Im|)rovements to or in such Asylum, or the Offices, Outbuildings, Yards, Courts, Outlets, Grounds, Land, and Appurtenances theieto belonging, which to them may seem necessary or proper for the further or better Accommodation of tlie Pauper Lunatics who may be received or taken care of therein, provided that the Expense of all such Additions, Alterations, and Improvements shall not exceed Four hundred Pounds in any One Year ; and if such Aajdum belong to One County or Borou^^h only, they shall cause the Expense of such Repairs, Additions, Alterations, or Improvements to be paid by making an Order upon the Treasurer of such Countj' or Borough for the Payment thereof, but if otherwise they shall apportion such Expense in tlie Pro- portion in wiiich each County or Borough has contributed to the Erection thereof, or where any other Proportion is fixed by any Agreement for the Time being in force, tlien in such other Proportion, and where any such Agreement only pro- vides in what Proportion the Expense of Repairs shall be defrayed, the said Committee shall apportion the Expense of such Additions, Alterations, and Im- provements in the same Proportion unless it be otherwise provided by such Agree- ment, and the said Committee sball make an Order on the Treasurer of each County or Borough for the Payment of the Pro|)ortion to be paid by sucii County or Borough, and such Treasurer shall pay the same accordingly out of any Money of such County or Borough tlien in his Hands, or which may thereafter come to his Hands, not specifically appropriated to any other Purpose, and the same may be recovered from him, for the Benefit of such Asylum, by the Treasurer or Clerk thereof, together with all Costs and Expenses, in any of Her Majesty's Courts at Westminster, or in any other Court of competent Jurisdiction : Provided always, nevertheless, that no Order for any such Repairs, Additions, Alterations, or im- provements as aforesaid, or for the Payment of any Money for the Expenses thereof, where such Expenses exceed the Sum of One hundred Pounds, shall be made, unless Notice of the Meeting at which the same shall be ordered, and of the Intention to determine thereat the Question of such Expenditure, have been given in such Manner and so long before the 'J'inie appointed for the Meeting a3 is herein-before provided with respect to Notices of Meetings of Committees of Visitors, nor unless Three Vititnrs concur in and sign such Order : Provided also, that where any such Expenditure as aforesaid is incurred otherwise than for ordinary Repairs, the Visitors shall report the same to the next Cxeneral or Quarter Sessions of the County or Borough, or each County and Borough, on behalf of which such Expenditure has been incurred. Power of Visitors, vnth Consent of Secretary of State, to dissolve Unions. XXXIX. It shall be lawful for every Committee of Visitors, with the Consent of One of Her Majesty's Princiiial Secretaries of State under his Hand, to deter- mine and dissolve any Union, whether such Union have been formed under this Act or under any former Act, and upon such Dissolution to divide and allot the Lands, Buildings, Hereditaments, Chattels, Monies, and Effects of or belonging to such Union between or among every sucii County and Borough, and the Sub- scribers (if any) between which and whom such Union existed, in the Proportions in which they respectively have contributed thereto or are interested therein, or in such other Proportions and Manner as the said Visitors, with the Approbation 238 APPENDIX. of the said Secretary of State, think fit ; and if on any such Division or Allotment there cannot be conveniently allotted to any County or Borough or Subscribers the jiroper Proportion of such County, Borough, or Subscribers in the Lands, Buildings, Hereditaments, Chattels, Monies, and Effects of such Union, there shall be paid to such County, Borough, or Subscribers such Sum of Money as the said Visitors, with the Approbation of the said Secretary of State, may direct, in full or in part Satisfaction, as the Case may require, of the aforesaid Proportion of such County, Borough, or Subscribers ; and every such Sum of Money shall be raised by tlie County or Counties, Borough or Boroughs, to or between or among wliich the Lands, Buildings, Hereditaments, Monies, Chattels, and Effects of the said Union shall be allotted (if more than One) in such Shares as the said Visitors, with the Approbation of the said Secretary of State, think fit, in the same Manner and by the same Means as other Monies are appointed to be raised by Counties or Boroughs for the Purposes of this Act : Provided always, that no Union shall be so dissolved by any Committee of Visitors except under a Resolution of such Committee at a Meeting specially convened for the Purpose of determining the Question of such Dissolution by a Notice given in such Manner and so long before the Time appointed for such Meeting as is herein-before provided with respect to Notices of Meetings of Committees of Visitors, nor unless the Majority oithe whole Number of the Committee of Visitors shall at such Meeting have concurred in such Resolution : Provided always, that in the Case of a Dissolution of Union, where any County or Borough having an Asylum shall be united with any County or Counties. Borough or Boroughs, not having an Asylum, and have erected additional Buildings and incurred any other Expense for their Benefit, and be in the Recei{it of an annual fixed Sum or Rent as a Remuneration for the Expenses so incurred in lieu of the Payment of a Sum in gr iss, it shall be lawful for the said County or Counties, Borough or Boroughs, so paying such Rent, if they shall think fit, to raise, in the same Manner as is provided in the Act for the Purpose of erecting County Asylums, such a Sum of Money for the Purpose of compensating the County or Borough receiving such Rent for the Cessation of such Rent as may he agreed upon and approved of by the Committee of Visitors of such County or Counties, Borough or Boroughs, as may have been so united as aforesaid. Power for Tisitors, wilh Consent of Secretary of State, to sell or exchange Lands and Buildingi. Application of Purchase Monies. XL. It shall be lawful for every Committee of Visitors, with the previous Consent of One of Her Majesty's Principal Secretaries of Sate under his Hand, to sell, either by Public Auction or Private Contract, and subject to any Conditions, anv Lands or Buildings or Parts of Lands or Buildings which may have belonged to and been used as or together with an Asylum, or which may have been purchased or otherwise acquired under any former Act or this Act, for the Purposes of an Asjdum, and found unsuitable or otherwise not required for such Purposes, or to give the same in exchange for other Lands or Buildings, and to pay or receive through the Treasurer of such Asylum any xMoney by way of Equality of Exchange ; and every Conveyance of Lands or Buildings so sold or given in exchange which shall be executed by the Persons in whom the same may then be vested as Trustees, or by any Three "of the Members of the Committee of Visitors who sell the same, shall be effectual to convey the same for all the Estate or Interest then vested in such Trustees, in trust for the Purposes of such Asylum, and the Receipt of any Three of the Committee of Visitors shall be a sufficient Discharge for the Purchase Monies or for any Monies to be received for Equality of Exchange ; and such Monies, in case the Sale or Exchange be made by a Committee of Visitors of any One County or Borough alone, shall be ap[)lied in carrying into execution the Powers and Purposes of this Act, or shall be paid to the Treasurer of such County or Borough and be applied for the general Purposes thereof, or otherwise, .as the Justices of such County or Borough shall, at some General or Quarter Sessions for such County, or at some Special Meeting of the .Justices of sucli Borough, direct ; and in every other Case the Monies received shall be paid to the Treasurer of the APPENDIX. 239 County, Dorough, or Subscribers to which or to whom the Property sold or ex- changed belonged, in case it belonged to any One of them, or if the same was joint Property then to the respective Treasurera of every County and Borough, and of the Subscribers, if any, in the Proportion in which such County, Borough, and Subscribers were respectively interested therein ; and such Monies shall be lield and applied by every such Treasurer, in tiie Case of a County or Borough, as Part of the general Rates or Funds of such County or Borough, and in the Case of any Subscribers, as the Majority of such of the Subscribers as shall be present at any Meeting convened for that Purpose shall direct. Visitors may, with Consent of Secretary of State, get released from Contracts. XLT. Where any Committee of Visitors have (either before or after tlie passing of this Act) contracted for the Purchase of any Lands for the Purposes of an Asylum, or for any Exchange of any Lands for other Lands for such Purposes, aud the Lands so contracted to be purchased or taken in exchange are found to be unsuitable or are not retjuired for such Pur[)oses, such Committee, or any other Committee appointed in their Place, may, with the Consent in Writing of One of Her Majesty's Principal Secretaries of State, (notwithstanding sucli Contract may have been approved as n quired by the said Acts hereby repealed, or this Act,) procure a Release from the said Contract, and in consideration of such Sum of Money (if any) as the said Committee, with such Consent as aforesaid, may agree to pay ; and the said Committee or any Three of such Committee may, in con- sideration of such Release, execute a Release to the other Party, to such Contract oi- other the Persons bound thereby ; and the Consideration Money (if any) by the said Committee agreed to be paid as aforesaid, and all Expenses in relation to the said Contract and Releases, shall be paid, defrayed, and raised in like Manner as if the same were payable in respect of the Purchase of Lauds for the Purposes aforesaid. Visitors empowered to contract for the Reception of Pauper Lunatics into Asylums of other Counties or Hospitals or licensed Houses. Period of such Contract limited. As to Money payable under Contract for Reception of Lunatics into any Asylum. XLII. It shall be lawful for every Committee of Visitors to contract with the Committee of Visitors of any Asylum, or with the Subscribers to any Hospital registered or the Proprietor of any House licensed for the Reception of Lunatics, for the Reception into such Asylum, Hospital, or Hcnise of the whole or of a Portion of the Pauper Lunatics of the County or Counties, Borough or Boroughs, or Counties and Boroughs, or any of them respectively, for which such first- mentioned Commitiee is acting, or for the Use ;inu Occupation of all or any Part of such registered Hospital or licensed House, at such Sum, either in gross or by way of annual or other periodical Payment or Rent, and under and subject to such Terms, Stipulations, and Conditions, as such Visitors shall think fit ; and it shall be lawful for the Committee of Visitors of any Asylum, or the Subscribers to any registered Hospital, or the Proprietor of any licensed House, to contract with any Conmiittee of Visitors accordingly : Provided always, that no such Contract shall be made for any longer Period than for the Term of Five Years, and that any such Contract may be detjrmined by Notice in Writing under the Hand of One of Her M;ijesty's Principal Secretaries of State, and that every such Contract with the Proprietor of a licensed House shall determine on such House ceasing to be duly licensed for the Reception of Lunatics ; provided also, that no such Con- tract shall exempt the Justices of any (. ounty or Borough or any C'ommit'ee from the immediate Duty and Obligation of erecting or providing, or uniting in erecting or providing, an Asylum or additional A.sylum, or of enlargins: or im- proving any Asylum, as retjuired by this Act, where One of Her Majesty's Principal Secretaries of State has caused Notice to be given as aforesaid for the Determination of such Contract, although the Term for which such Contract w.as entered into has not expired by EfBuxion of Time : Provided also, that any Money 240 APPENDIX, which may he payable under such Contract for the Reception of the Lunatics of any County or Borough into any Asylum beyond the weekly hums which may be charged under this Act for the Lodging, Maintenance, Medicine, Clothing, a,ud Care of Lunatics in the Asylum belonging to the County or Borough to which such Lunatics shall belong, shall be paid, defrayed, and raised by such County or Barough out of any Monies in the Hands of the Treasurer for the County which sliall be applicable for the Repairs or other ordinnry Expenses of such Asylum ; provided also, that any Hospital or licensed House with the Subscribers or Pro- prietor of which any such Cummittee so contract as aforesaid shall be subject to the Visitation of any of the Members of such Committee for the Time being. When any Asylam can accommodate more than the Lunatics of the County or Borougli, Visitors may order the Admission of other Lunatics. XLIII. Whenever it appears to the Committee of Visitors of any Asylum that such Asylum is more than sufiBcient for the Accommodation of all the Pauper Lunatics of the County or Borough or each County and Borough to which the same wholly or in part belongs, and of any County or Counties, Borough or Boroughs with which any existing Contract for the Reception of all or any of the Pauper Lunatics thereof in such Asylum has been entered into, or which shall otherwise contribute to such Asylum, it shall be lawful for the Committee of Visi- tors, if they think tit, to give Notice thereof by Advertisement in some Newspaper commonly cii-culated in such County or Borough, or every such County or Borough as aforesaid, and (subject nevertheless and without Prejudice to any Agreement with any voluntary Subscribers,) by a Resolution of the said Committee, to per- mit the Admission of so many Pauper Lunatics of any other County or Borough, and (if such Committee think fit) Lunatics not Paupers, but who, in the Opinion of such Committee, may be proper Objects to be admitted into a public Asylum, as to such Committee may seem expedient, and at any Time to rescind or vary any such Resolution ; and such Committee may, if they think fit, by such Resolution require that no Pauper Lunatic shall be admitted into such Asylum thereunder without an Undertaking by the Minute of the Guardians of the Union or Parish, or sio-ned by Two of the Overseers of the Parish, to which such Lunatic is charge- able,°orin the Case of a Lunatic not a Pauper by the Person signing the Order for the Admission of such Lunatic, for the due Payment of the weekly Charge for the Lodging, M untenance. Medicine, Clothing, and Care of such Lunatic during his Continuance in such Asylum, and of the Expenses of his Burial in case he die therein, as well as for the Removal of such Lunatic from such Asylum within Six Days after Due Notice given in Writing by the Superintendent of such Asylum ; and such Lunatic not being a Pauper shall have the same Accommodation in all respects as the I'auper Lunatics. No Visitor to have any Interest in any Contract or Agreement. XLIV. No Visitor of any Asylum shall have or take, or be capable of having or taking, any Interest or Concern whatsoever, either in his own Name or in the Name of any other Person, in any Contract or Agreement to be made under the Authority of this Act or in anywise relating to or connected with such Asylum, or shall for any Design or Plan he may deliver or produce, receive any Benefit or Emolument whatever, or otherwise have or take any Benefit or Emolument what- soever, from or out of the Funds of the Asylum : Provided always, that this Enactment shall not extend to any such Interest, Benefit, or Emolument which any Visitor may have or derive by reason of his being a Shareholder of any Joint Stock Conijiany established by Act of Parliament or by Charter, with which any Contract may be entered into on behalf of such Asylum, or which may otherwise receive any Benefit or Emolument out of the Funds of the Asylum ; provided that no Contract or Dealing between such Company and the Visitors of such Asylum be at or upon Rates or Terms more advantageous to such Company than in the Case of Contracts or Dealings by such Company witii other Parties. APPENDIX. 241 Plans, xpenses requisite for each Pauper Lunatic, and that the total Amuunt of such weekly Sums, after defraying such Expenses, may also be sufficient to pay the Salaries of the Officers and Attendants, and such Committee may from Time to Time alter the Amount of such weekly Sum as Occasion may require ; provided always, that any such Committee may, if they think fit, fix a greater weekly Sum to be charged as aforesaid in respect of Pauper Lunatics other than those sent to such Asylum from or settled in some Parish or Place situate in any County or Borough to which such Asylum belongs ; provided also, that such Sum shall in no Case exceed the Rate of Fourteen Shillings pe»' Week ; but if the aforesaid Rate of Fourteen Shillings Vje found insufficient for the Purposes aforesaid, it shall be lawful for the major Part of the Justices of the County or Borough, or of each County or Borough to which such Asylum may belong, present at any General or Quarter Sessions for such County, or at a Special Meeting of the Justices of such Borough, or each such County or Borough respectively, to make such Addition to such Rate MS to them respectively shall seem fit and necessary, and to make an Order or Orders accordingly, which Order or Orders shall be signed by the Clerk of the Peace for the County, or Clerk to the Justices foi- the Borough, and forthwith published in some Newspaper commonly circulated within such County or Borough. Visitors to appoint a Chaplain. Patients allowed the Visits of any Minister of their own persuasi.on. Visitors to appoint Medical Officer, Clerk, and Teasurer, and such other Officers and Servants as they think fit. LV. The Committee of Visitors of every Asylum shall appoint a Chaplain for the same, who shall be in Priest's Orders, and shall be licensed by the Bishop of the APPENDIX. 245 Diocese, and the Licence of any such Chaplain as aforesaid shall he revocable by the liishop whenever lie shall think fit ; and such Chaplain, or his iSuiwtitute approved hy the Visitors, shall perform and celebrate, in the Chapel of or in some convenient Place within or belonging to such Asylum, Divine Service according to the Kites of the Church of England as establislied by Law, on every Sunday, Ckristmuis Day, and Good Friday, and shall also perform and celebrate sucb liervice witiiin the said Asylum at such other Times, and also such other Services according to the liites of the Church of England as established by Law at such Times, as the Visitors shall direct ; and if any Patient be of a religious Persua&ion differing from that of the Estai)lished Church, a Minister of such P'ersuasion, at the special Request of such Patient, or his Friends, shall, with the Consent of tiie Medi'-al Officer of such Asylum, aud under such Regulations as he shall direct, be allowed to visit such Patient at proper and reasonable Times ; and the Committee of Visitors of every Asj'lum shall aj)point a Rledical Officer, who shall be resident in such Asylum, aud who shall not be Clerk or Treasurer of such Asylum, and a Clerk and Treasurer, and such other Officers and Servants for the Asylum, as the Committee may think tit ; and the Committee shall have Power to remove the Chaplain, Medical Officer, Clerk, and Treasurer, or any other Officer or Servant, and shall from Time to Time, upon every Vacancy, by Death, Removal, or other- wise, in the Office of the Chaplain, Medical Officer, Clerk, or Treasurer of the Asylum, appoint some other Person to such Office, subject to the Conditions and Restrictions affecting the original Appointment to such Office, and may from Time to Time fill up or not, as in their Discretion they may think fit, Vacancies among other Officers and Servants of the Asylum ; and the Committee shall, if they think fit, have Power to appoint a Visiting Physician or Surgeon to every such Asylum, and shall from Time to Time appoint the Medical Officer or one of the Medical Officers (if more than One) of the Asylum, or where there is a separate Medical Officer of each Division, then the Medical Officer or One of the Medical Officers (if more than One) of each Division, to be the Superintyndunt of the Asylum, or of such respective Division thereof, and may remove any such Officer from being such Superintendent, and such Superintendent shall be resident in the Asylum ; and the Committee shall from Time to Time fix the Salaries and Wages to be paid to the Officers and Servants of the Asylum: Provided always, that it shall be lawful for the said Committee, with the Sanction and Approbation of One of Her Majesty's Principal Secretaries of State, to appoint an}' Person other than such Medical Officer to he such Superintendent : Provided also, that where, on the 'J'enth Day of February One thousand eight hundred and fifty-tiiree, any Person, other than a resident Medical Officer, was the Superintendent of any Asylum, such I'erson may continue to be such Superintendent as if this Act had not been passed, unless and until the Committee otherwise direct. Clerk of Asylum to transmit to Commissioners in Lunacy Information of Dismissal of A ttendants. LVL The Clerk of every Asylum shall, within One Week after the Dismissal for Misconduct of any Nurse or Attendant employed in such Asylum, transmit to the Commissioners in Lunacy, by the Post, luformation in Writing under his Hand of such Dismissal, and of the Cause thereof ; and every such Clerk neglecting to transmit such Information to the said Commissioners within One Week after the Dismissal of any such Nurse or Attendant shall for every such Offence forfeit any Sum not exceeding Ten Pounds. Visitors may grant Superannuations to the Superintendent, orough, he shall for such Offence forfeit any Sum not exceeding Ten Pounds. Liit^ of Pauper Patients in Asylums to he made half-yearly and laid before Visitors, and Copies transmitted to Clerks of the Peace and Commissioners in Lunacy. Lists of private Patients to be sent half-yearly to the Commis- sioners. LXIIL The Clerk of every Asylum shall, on the First Day of January and the First Day of July in every Year, prepare a List of all Pauper Lunatics then in such Asylum, according to the Form in Schedule (C. ) No. 1. to this Act annexed, and within Fifteen Days after such List shall have been prepared One Copy thereof shall be laid by such CJerk before the Visitors of the Asylum, and another shall be transmitted by him to the Clerk of the Peace of every or any County and to the Clerk to the justices of every or any Borough to which such Asylum solely or jointly belongs, to be by him laid before the Justices of such County or Borough, and another Copy of such List shall within the same Time be transmitted by such Clerk to the Corainissioners in Lunacy ; and the Clerk of every Asylum receiving private Patients shall also on the First Day of January and First Day of July in every Year prepare a List containing the Christian Names and Surnames of all the private Patients in such Asylum in the Form in Schedule (C.) No. 2. to this Act annexed, and shall within Fifteen Days after such List shall have been pre- pared transmit the same to the Conmiissioners in Lunacy ; and shall also within the same Time transnut to such Clerk of the Peace and Clerk to the Justices as aforesaid, for the Purposes aforesaid, a Certificate under his Hand of the Number of such private Patients of each Sex. Clerks of Boards of Guardians, and Overseers where no Guardians, to make annual Returns of Pauper Lunatics. LXIV. The Clerk of the Board of Guardians of every Union, and of every Parish under a Board of Gu;irdians, and the Overseers of every Parish not in a Union nor under a Board of Guardians, shall, on the First Day of January in everv Year, or as soon after as may be, make out and sign a true and faithful List of all Tjuuatics chargeable to the Union or Parish in the Form in Schedule (D.) hereunto annexed, and shall, on or before the First Day of February next suc- ceeding, lay One Coj^y of such List before the Visitors of the Asylum or before the Visitors of each Asylum (if more than One) of the County or Borough in which such Union or Parish is situate, and shall transmit One Copy of such List to the Clerk of the Peace of the County, or the Clerk to the Justices of the Borough within which the Union or Parish to which each such Lunatic is chargeable \n situate, to be by him laid before the Justices acting for such County at their next General or Quarter Sessions, or before the Justices of such Borough, and another Copy of such List to the Commissioners in Lunacy, and another Copy thereof to the Poor Law Board ; and any such Clerk or Overseer neglecting to make out and sign such List, or to transmit Copies thereof, as herein directed, shall for every such Offence forfeit any Sum not exceeding Twenty Pounds. 24)8 APPENDIX. Power for Medical Persojis, Guardians, and Overseers of Unions and Parishes, to visit Pauper Patients of such Unions and Parishes confined in any Asylum. LXV. Any Physician, Surgeon, or Apotliecary to be appointed by the Guar- dians of any Union or Parish, or the Overseers of any Parish, and also the Guardians of any Union or Parish, and the Overseers of any Parish, shall be permitted, whenever they see fit, between the Hours of Eight in the Morning and Six in the Evening, to visit and examine any or every Pauper Lunatic chargeable to such Union or Parish confined in any Asylum, registered Hospital, or licensed House: Provided always, that if the Medical Officer of any Asylum be of opinion that it will be injurious to any Lunatic to permit such Visit and Examination, and such Medical Officer state in Writing the Reasons why such Lunatic should not be visited and examined, and sign such Statement, and deliver the same to the Person or Persons so requiring to visit and examine such Lunatic, then and in such Case it shall be lawful for such Medical Officer to refuse such Visit and Examination ; and in every such Case such Medical Officer shall forthwitli enter in the Medical Journal the Reasons set forth in such Statement for such Refusal, and shall sign such Entry. Provisions conceening Visitation, Confinement, Removal, and Discharge of Lunatics. Every Pauper Lunatic not in an Asylum, registered Hospital, or licensed House, to be visited once a Quarter by the Medical Officer of the Parish or Union and last of such Lunatics to be sent to Commissioners in Lunacy. LXVI. Every Pauper Lunatic not in an Asylum, or a Hospital registered or a House licensed for the Reception of Lunatics, shall be visited once in every Quarter of a Year (reckoning the several Quarters of the Year as ending on the Thirty-first Day of March, the Thirtieth Day of June, the Thirtieth Day of September, and the Thirty-first Day of December,) by the Medical Officer of or for the Parish or Union or District of a Parish or Union in which such Lunatic is resident ; and such Medical Officer shall be paid the Sum of Two Shillings and Sixpence for each such quarterly Visit to any Pauper not being in a Workhouse, which Sum shall be paid by the same Persons, and be charged to the same Account as the Relief of such Pauper ; and within Seven Days after the End of every such Quarter such Medical Officer shall prepare and sign a List according to the Form in the Schedule (E. ) to this Act of all such Lunatics, and shall state therein whether in the Opinion of such Medical Officer all or any of such Lunatics are or are not properly taken care of, and may or may not properly remain out of an Asylum, and such Medical Officer shall within the Time aforesaid deliver or send such List to the Clerk to the Guardians of such Palish or Union, or if such Parish be not under a Board of Guardians to One of the Overseers thereof; and the Forms for such Lists shall be from Time to Time furnished to the Medical Officer of every Parish under a Board of Guardians, and to the Medical Officers of every Union, by the Guardians of such Parish or Union ; but nothing in this Enactment shall be taken or construed to relieve any Medical Officer from any Obligation by this Act imposed upon him to give Notice to a Relieving Officer or Overseer where it appears to such Medical Officer that any Pauper Lunatic ought to be sent to an Asylum ; and such Clerk or Over- seer receiving any such List as aforesaid shall, within Three Days after the Receipt thereof, transmit the same to the Commissioners in Lunacy, and a Copy thereof to the Clerk to the V isitors of the Asylum for the County or Borough in which the Parish or Union for which he is Clerk or Overseer is situate ; and every such Medical Officer, Clerk, or Overseer failing to comply with this Enactment shall for every such Offence forfeit any Sum not exceeding Twenty Pounds nor under Two Pounds. Provision for sending Pauper Lunatics to Asylums. LXVII. Every Medical Officer of a Parish or Union who shall have Knowledge that any Pauper resident in such Pariah, or in any Parish within the District APPENDIX. 24-I) of such Medical Officer, is or is deemed to be a Lunatic, and a proper Person to be sent to an As\luni, shall vvitliin Three Days after obtainiiijj such Knowledge give Notice thereof in Writing to a Relieving Officer of such Parish, or if there is no Relieving Officer then to One of the Overseers of such Parish, and every Relieving Officer of any Parish within a Union or under a Board of Guardians, and every Overseer of a Parish of which there is no Relieving Officer, who shall have Know- ledge, either by such Notice or otherwise, that any Pauper resident in such Parish is oris deemed to be a Lunatic, and a proper Person to be sent to an Asylum, shall within Three Days alter obtaining such Knowledge give Notice thereof to some Justice of the County or Lorougli within which such Parish is situate; and thereupon the said Justice shall, by an Order under his Hand and Seal, require such Relieving Officer or Overseer to bring such Pauper before him, or some other Justice of the said County or Borough, at such Time and Place -vithin Three Days from the Time of such Notice being given to such Justice as shall lie appointed by the said Order ; and the said Justice before whom such Pauper shall be brought shall call to his Assistance a Physician, Surgeon, or Apothecary, and examine such Person; and if such Physician, Surgeon, or Apothecary shall sign a Certificate ■with respect to such Pauper, according to the Form in Schedule (F.) No. 3. to this Act annexed, and such Justice be satisfied, upon View or personal Examina- tion of such Pauper or other Proof, that such Pauper is a Lunatic, and a proper Person to be taken charge of and detained under Care and Treatment, he shall, by an Order under his Hand accordii.g to the Form in the said Schedule (F.) No. ]. to tills Act annexed, direct such Pauper to be received into such Asylum as herein-after mentioned, or, where herein-after authorized in this Behalf, into some Hospital registered or some House duly licensed for the Reception of Lunatics ; and such Relieving Officer or Overseer shall immediately convey or cause the said Lunatic to be conveyed to such Asylum, Hosintal, or House, and such Lunatic shall be received and detained therein : Provided always, that it shall be lawful for any Justice, upon Notice being given to him as aforesaid, or upon his own Knowledge, without any such Notice as aforesaid, to examine any Pauper deemed to be lunatic at his own Abode or elsewhere, and to proceed in all respects as if such Pauper were brought before him in punsuance of an Order for that Purpose ; provided also, that in case any Pauper deemtd to be lunatic cannot, on account of his Health or other Cause, be convenientlj' taken before any Justice, such Pauper may be examined at Ids own Abode or elsewhere by an Officiating Clergyman of the Parish in which he is resident, together with a Relieving Officer, orif there be no Relieving Officer an Overseer of such Parish, and such Officiating Clergyman, together with such Relieving Officer or Overseer, shall call to their Assistance a Physician, Surgeon, or Apothecary ; and if such Physician, Surgeon, or Apothecary shall sign a Certi- ficate with respect to such Pauper according to the said Form in the said Schedule (F.) No. 3., and if upon View or Examination of such Pauper such Officiating Clergyman and such Relieving Officer or Overseer be satisfied that such Pauper is a Lunatic, and a proper Person to be taken charge of and detained under Care and Treatment, such Officiating Clergyman, together with such Overseer or Reliev- ing Officer, shall, by an Order under their Hands according to the said Form in tiie said Schedule (F.) No. L, direct such Pauper to be received into such Asylum as herein-after nientioned, or, where herein-after authorized in this P.ehalf, into some such registered Hospital or licensed House as aforesaid, and such Relieving Officer or Overseer shall immediately convey, or cause such Pauper to be conveyed to such Asylum, Hospital, or House, and such Pauper shall be received and iletained therein ; provided also, that if the Physician, Surgeon, or Apothecary by whom any such Pauper shall be examined shall certify in Writing that he is not in a fit State to be removed, his Removal shall be suspended uniil the same or scmie other Physician, Surgeon, or Apothecary shall certify in Writing that he is fit to be removed ; and every such Physician, Surgeon, and Apothecary is required to give such last-mentioned Certificate as soon as in his Judgment it ought to be given ; provided also, that where a Certificate in the Form in the said Schedule (F.) No. 3. is signed by the Medical Officer of the Parish or I'uion in which the Pauper named therein is resident, as well as by some other Person being ii Physician, Surgeon, or Apothecary called to the Assistance of the Justice or 250 APPENDIX. Clergyman and Overseer or Relieving Officer, as herein-before mentioned, such joint Certificate, or sucli Two Certificates, (as the Case may be,) shall be received by the Justice or Clergyman and Overseer or Relieving Officer by whom such Person is examined as herein-before mentioned as conclusive Evidence that the Person named therein is a Lunatic, and a proper Person to be taken charge of and detained under Care and Treatment, and he or they shall make an Order in the Form in the said Schedule (F.) No. 1. accordingly. Provision as to Lunatics wandering at large, not being 'properly tahen care of, or being cruelly treated, ;ing, Maintenance, Medicine, Clothing, and Care of a Pauper Lunatic heretofore or hereafter removed to an Asylum, registered Hospital, or licensed House under tlie Authority of this or any other Act, who would, at the Time of his being conveyed to such Asylum, Hospital, or House, have been exempt from Removal to the Parish of bis Settlement or the Country of his Birth by reason of some Provision in the Act of the Session holden in the Ninth and Tenth Years of Her Majesty, Chapter Sixty-six, shall be paid by the Guardians of the Parish wherein such Lunatic shall have acquired such Exemption if such Parish be subject to a separate Board of Guardians, or by the Overseers of such Parish where the same is not subject to sucli separate Board, and where such Parish shall be com- prised in any Union the same shall be paid by the Guardians, and be charged to the Common Fund of such Union so long as the Cust of the Rehef of Paupers rendered irremovable by the last- mentioned Act shall continue to be chargeable upon the Common Funds of Unions ; and no Order shall be made under any Provision contained in this or any other Act upon the Parish of the Settlement in respect of any such Lunatic Pauper during the Time that the above-mentioned Charges are to be paid and charged as herein provided ; and Section Five of the Act of the Session holden in the Twelfth and Thirteenth Years of Her Majesty, Chapter One hundred and three, shall be repealed. Guardians and Overseers may pay Charges without Orders of Justices. CIII. Provided also. That any Guardians or Overseers who would be liable under any Provision contained in this Act to have an Order made upon them for the Payment of any Money may pay the same without any such Order being made, and may charge the same to such Account as they could have done if such Order had been made. Lunatic's Property to he available for his Maintenance. CIV. If it appear to any Justice or Justices by this Act authorized to make any Order for the Payment of Money for the Maintenance of any Lunatic that such Lunatic has an Estate, Real or Personal, applicable to his Maintenance, and more than sufficient to maintain his Family, if any, he or they shall, by an Order under his or tlieir Hand and Seal or Hands and Seals, direct the Overseers of the Parish, or a Relieving Officer of the Parish or Union, or the Treasurer or some other Officer of the County to which such Lunatic is chargeable, or in which any Property of the Lunntic may be, or an Officer of the Asylum in which the Lunatic may be, to seize so much of any Money, and to seize and sell so much of the Goods and Chattels, and to take and receive so much of the Rents and Prf)fits of the Lands and Tenements of such Lunatic and other Income of such Lunatic as may be necessary to pay the Charges of the Examination, brimming before a Justice or Justices, Removal, Lodging, Maintenance, Clothing, Medicine, and Care of such Lunatic, accounting for the same to such Justice or Justices, such Charges having heen first ])roveil to the Satisf;iction of such Justice or Justices, and the Amount set forth in such Order ; and if any 'J'rustee or other Person having the Possession, Custody, or Charge of any Property of such Lunatic, or if the Governor and Com- pany of the Bank of England, or any other Body or Person having in their or his Hands any Stock, Interest, Dividend, or Annuity belonging or due to such Lunatic, pay any Money according to any such Order, or pay any Money without any such Order, to the Guardians of any Union or Parish, or to any Overseer of any Parish not in a Union or under a Board of Guardians, or to the Treasurer of any County, or any other Officer of any County authorized to receive the same, to defray the Charges paid or incurred by or on behalf of such Parish, Union, or County for the Examination, bringing before a Justice or Justices, Removal, Lodging, Maintenance, Clothing, Medicine, and Care of such Lunatic, the Receipt of the Person authorized to receive such Money under such Order, or of such Guardians, Overseer, or Treasurer, or other Officer, shall be a good Discharge to such Trustee, Governor, and Company, or other Body or Person as aforesaid. APPENDIX. 263 Liahllity of Relations of Pauper not to be affected. CV. The Liability of auy Relation or Person to maintain any Lunatic shall not be taken away or affected where such Lunatic is sent to or coiiRried in any Asylum, registered Hospital, or licensed House by any Provision herein contained concerning the Maintenance of such Lunatic, Persons aggrieved by Refusal of an Order may appeal to the Sessions. CVI. If any Person feel aggrieved by any Refusal of an Order of any Justice or Justices as aforesaid, such Person may appeal to the next General or Quarter Sessions of the Peace for the County or Borough where the Matter of Appeal has arisen, the Person so appealing having given to the Justice or Justices against whom such Ajipeal is made Fourteen clear Days' Notice of such Appeal, and such Sessions are hereby autliorized and required to hear and determine the Matter of such Appeal in a summary Way, and their Determination shall be final and conclusive. Party obtaining Order of Adjudication to send Copy thereof and Statement of Grounds to the Parish or Comity affected. CVII. The Overseers of any Parish, and the Guardians of any Union or Parish, and the Clerk of the Peace of any County obtaining any Order under tliis Act adju.lging the Settlement of any Lunatic to be in any Parish, shall, within a reasonable Time after such Order has been made, send or deliver, by Post or otherwise, to the Overseers or Guardians of the Parish in which such Lunatic is adjudged to be settled, a Copy or Duplicate of such Order, and also a Statement in Writing under their or his Hands or Hand, or where they are the Guardians of a Union or Parish under the Hands of any Three or more of such Guardians, staling the Description and Address of the Overseers, Guardians, or Clerk of the Peace obtaining such Order, and the Place of Confinement of the Lunatic, and setting forth the Grounds of such Adjudication, including the Particulars of any Settlement or Settlements relied upon in support thereof ; and on the Hearing of any Appeal against any such Order it shall not be lawful for the Respondents to go into or give Evidence of any other Grounds in support of such Order than those set forth in such Statement. Appeal against Order of Adjudication. CVIIL If the Guardians of any Union or Parish, or the Overseers of any Parish, feel aggrieved by auy such Order as aforesaid adjudging the Settlement of any Lunatic, they or he may appeal against the same to the next General Quarter Sessions of the Peace for the County in behalf of which such Order has been obtained, or in which the Union or Parish obtaining such Order is situate, or in case such Parish or Union extend into several Juris actions, then to the next General Quarter Sessions of the Peace for the County or liorough in w-hich the Asylum, ivgistered Hospital, or licensed House in which such Lunatic is or has been confined is situate, and such Sessions upon hearing the said Appeal shall have full Power finally to determine the Matter. Copy of Depositions to be furnished on Application. CIX. Tlie Clerk to the Justices making any Order adjudging the Settlement of any Lunatic, or the Clerk of the Peace in the Case herein-after provided for, shall keep the Depositions upon which such Order was made, and shall within Seven Days furnish a Copy of such Depositions to any Party authorized to appeal against such Order, if such Party apply for such Copy, and pay for the same at the Kate of Twopence for every Folio of Seventy-two Words ; provided that no Omission or Delay in furnishing such Copy of Uie Depositions shall be deemed or construed to be any Ground of Appeal against the Order : Provided also, that on the Trial of any Appeal against any such Order, no such Order shall be quashed or set aside either wholly or in part on the Ground that such Depositions do not 264 APPENDIX. furnish sufficient Evidence to support, or that any Matter therein contained or o:iiitted raises an Objection to the Order, or Grounds on which the same was made : Provided also, that if the Justices who make any such Order have not any Clerk, tliey shall send or deliver the Depositions to the Clerk of the Peace of the County or Borough to the General Quarter Sessions whereof the Appeal against such Order is given by this Act, and the Party obtaining such Order shall, in such Statement of Grounds of Adjudication as aforesaid, state that such Justices have not any Clerk. No Appeal if Notice not given within a certain Time after Notice of Order. ex. No Appeal shall be allowed against any such Order if Notice in Writing of such Appeal be not sent or delivered by Post or otherwise to the Party on whose Application the Order was obtained within the Space of Twenty-one Days after the sending or Delivery, as herein-before directed, of a Copy or Duplicate of such Order and such Statement as herein-before mentioned, unless within such Period of Twenty-one Days a Copy of the Depositions shall have been applied for as aforesaid liy the Party intending to appeal, in which Case a further Period of Fourteen Days after the sending of such Copy shall be allowed for the giving of such Notice of Appeal. Grounds of Appeal to be stated. CXI. In every Case where Notice of Appeal against such Order is given the x\ppellant shall, with such Notice, or Fourteen Days at least before the First Day of the Sessions at which such Appeal is intended to be tried, send or deliver by Post or otherwise to the Respondent a Statement in Writing under their or his Hands or Hand, or where the Appellants are the Guardians of any Union or Parish, under the Hands of any Three or more of such Guardians, of the Grounds of such Appeal ; and it shall not be lawful for the Appellant on the Hearing of any Appeal to go into or give Evidence of any other Grounds of Appeal than those set forth in such Statement. As to the Sufficiency of Statement of Grounds of Adjudication or Appeal. Power to amend Statement. CXII. Upon the Hearing of any Appeal against any such Order no Objection whatever on account of any Defect in the Form of setting forth any Ground of Adjudication or Appeal in an}' such Statement shall be allowed, and no Objection to tlie Keception of legal Evidence offered in support of any such Ground alleged to be set fortli in any such Statement shall prevail unless the Court be of opinion that such alleged Ground is so imperfectly or incorrectly set forth as to be insufficient to enable the Party receiving the same to inquire into the Subject of such Statement, and to prepare for Trial : Piovided always, that in all Cases where the Court is of opinion that any such Objection to such .Statement or to the Reception of Evidence ought to prevail, it shall be lawful for such Court, if it so think fit, to cause any such Statement to be forthwith amended by some Officer of the Court, or otherwise, on such Terms as to Payment of Costs to the other Party, or postponing the Trial to another day in the same Sessions, or to the next subsequent Sessions, or both Payment of Costs and Postponement, as to such Court appears just and reasonable. Power for Court to amend Order on account of Omission or Mistahe. Proviso. CXIII. If, upon the Trial of any Appeal against any such Order or upon the Return to a Writ of Certiorari, any Objection be made on account of any Omission or Mistake in the drawing up of such Order, and it be shown to the Satisfaction of the Court that sufficient Grounds were in proof before the Justices making such Order to have authorized the drawing up thereof free from the said Omission or Mistake, it shall be lawful for the Court, upon such Terms as to Pay- ment of Costs as it think fit, to amend such Order and to give Judgment as if no such Omission or Mistake had existed : Provided always, that no Objection on APPENDIX. 2 60 account of any Omission or Mistake in any such Order brought up upon a Return to a Writ of Certiorari shall be allowed, unless such Omission or Mistake have been specified in the Rule lor issuing such Writ of Certiorari. Party making frivolous or vexatious Statement of Qrounds liable to pay Costs. CXIV. If either of the Parties to the said Appeal shall have included in the Statement of Grounds of Adjudication or of Appeal sent to the opposite Party any Ground or Grounds in support of the Order or of Appeal which in the Opinion of tlie Court determining the Appeal, is or are frivolous and vexatious, such Party shall be liable, at the Discretion of the said Court, to pay the whole or any Part of the Costs incurred by the other Party in disputing any such Ground or Grounds. Party losing Appeal to pay such Costs as Court may direct. CXV. Upon every such Appeal the Court before whom the same is brought shall and may, if they think fit, order and direct the Party against which the same is decided to pay to the other such Costs and Charges as may to such Court appear just and reasonable, and shall certify the Amount thereof. Decisions of Courts upon hearing Appeals to he final. CXVI. The Decision of the Court upon the Hearing of any Appeal against any such Order, as well upon the tSufSciency and Effect of the Statement of tlie Grounds in support of the Order and Appeal, and of the Copy or Duplicate of the Order sent to the Appellant Parish or County, as upon the amending or refusing to amend the Order as aforesaid, or the Statement of Grounds, shall be final, and shall not be liable to be reviewed in any Court by means of a Writ of Certiorari or Mandamus or otherwise. Abandonment of Orders. CXVII. In any Case in which an Order has been made as aforesaid, and a Copy or Duplicate thereof sent as herein required, it shall and may be lawful fir the Party who has obtained such Order, whether any Notice of Appeal against such Order has or has not been given, and whether any Appeal has or has not been entered, to abandon such Order, by Notice in Writing under the Hand or Hands of such Party, oi-, where such Order has been obtained by the Guardians of any Union, under the Hands of any Three or more of such Guardians, to be sent by Post or delivered to the Appellant or the Party entitled to appeal, and there- upon the said Order and all Proceedings consequent thereon shall become and be null and void to all Intents and Purposes as if the same had not been made, and shad not be in any way given in Evidence, in case any other Order for the same Purposes shall be obtained : Provided always, that in all Cases of such Abandon- ment the Party so abandoning shall pay to the Appellant or the Party entitled to Appeal the Costs which he has incurred by reason of such Order and of all subsequent Proceedings thereon ; which Costs tlie proper Officer of the Court before whom any such Appeal (if it had not been abandoned) might have been brought shall, upon Application, tax ami ascertain at any Time, whether the Court be sitting or not, upon Production to him of such Notice of Abandonment, and upon Proof to him that such Reasonable Notice of Taxation, together with a Copy of the Bill of Costs, has been given to the Overseers, Guardians, or Clerk of the Peace abandoning such Order, as the Distance between the Parties shall in his Judgment require ; and thereupon the Sum allowed for Costs, including the usual Costs of Taxation, which such Officer is hereby empowered to charge and receive, shall be endorsed upon the said Notice of Abandonment, and the said Notice so endorsed shall be filed among the Records of the said Court. Provisions of this Act as to Expenses to extend to Pauper Lunatics sent to Asylums under any other Act, Ac. CXVIII. The Provisions of this Act for and concerning the Payment of Ex- penses incurred or to be incurred in relation to Pauper Lunatics shall be applicable 266 APPENDIX. with respect to Persons confined as Pauper Lunatics sent to any Asylum, regis- tered Hospital, or licensed House under any other Act authorizing their Reception therein as Pauper Lunatics, and (save as herein otherwise provided concerning any Lunatic who shall appear to have an Estate, Real or Personal, applicable to his Maintenance) with respect to all other Lunatics sent to any Asylum, registered Hospital, or licensed House under any Order of a Justice or Justices made under this Act, or the Acts hereby repealed, or any of tijem, as if such last-mentioned Lunatics were at the Time of being so sent actually chargeable to the Parish from which they have been or shall be sent. In Cases of Inquiries and Appeals Guardians and Officers interested to have Access to the Lunatic. CXIX. In every Case of an Inquiry, Investigation, Dispute, or Appeal as to the Parish in which a Pauper Lunatic is settled, the Guardians, Clerks of the Guardians, Relieving Officers, and Overseers of every Union including any Parish, or of any Parish, which Parish respectively is interested in such Inquiry, Inves- tigation, Dispute, or Appeal, and every Person duly authorized by them respec- tively, and the Clerk of the Peace of any County interested in such Inquiry, Investigation, Dispute, or Appeal, and every Person duly authorized by such Clerk of the Peace, shall at all reasonable Times be allowed free Access, in the Presence of the Medical Attendant, to the Lunatic, to examine him as to the Premises. Expenses of the Burial, Removal, or Discharge of a Pauper. CXX. On the Death, Discharge, or Removal of any Pauper from any Asylum, registered Hospital, or licensed House, the necessary Expenses attending the Burial, Discharge, or Removal of such Pauper shall be borne by the Union or Parish (if any) to which such Pauper is chargeable, as herein-before provided, or if such Pauper be chargeable to a County as herein-before provided, then by such County, and shall be paid by the Guardians of such Union or Parish, or by the Overseers of such Parish if not in a Union or under a Board of Guardians, or by the Treasurer of such County. Money ordered to he paid by any Clerk, Overseer, Relieving Oficer, or Treasurer to be levied (mi case of Neglect to pay) by Distress or Action. CXXI. If any Overseer, or any Treasurer of any County, upon whom any Order of Justices for the Payment of Money under the Provisions of this Act or of any Act hereby repealed is made, shall let use or neglect for the Space of Twenty Days next after due Notice of such Order to pay the Money so ordered to be paid, the said Money, together with the Expenses of recovering the same, shall be re- covered by Distress and Sale of the Goods of the Overseer or Treasurer so refusing or neglecting, by Warrant uniler the Hands and Seals of any Two Justices hereby a,uthorized to make the Order for Payment of the Money aforesaid, or by an Action at Law, or by any other Proceeding in any Court of competent Jurisdiction, against such Overseer or Treasurer ; and if the Guardians upon whom any such (Jrder is made refuse or neglect fa- such Time as aforesaid to pay the ]Maney so ordered to be paid, the same, together with the Expenses of recovering the same, may be recovered by an Action at Law or by any other Proceeding in any such Court ; and in case of any such Action or Proceeding no Objection shall be taken lo any Default or Want of Form in any Order of Admission or Maintenance, or in any Certificate or Adjudication under this Act, if such Order or Adjudication shall not have been appealed against, or if appealed against shall have been affirmed. MISCELLANEOUS. Medical Men signinr/ false Certificates, and. Persons not being Medical Men giving Certificates as such, guilty of Misdemeanor. CXXII. Any Physician, Surgeon, or Apothecary who shall sign any Certificate contrary to any of the Provisions herein contained shall for every such Offence APPENDIX. 2G7 forfeit any Sum not exceeding Twenty Pounds ; and any Physician, Surgeon, or Apothecary who shall falst-ly state or certify anything in any Certificate under this Act, and any Person who shall sign any Certificate under this Act, in which he shall be described as a Physician, Surgeon, or Apothecary, not lieing a Piiy- sician, Surgeon, or Apothecary respectively within the Meaning of this Act, shall be guilty of a Misdemeanor. Penalty on Officers or Servants ill-treating Lunatics. CXXIII. If any Superintendent, OflBcer, Nurse, Attendant, Servant, or other Person employed in any Asylum strike, wound, ill-treat, or wilfully neglect any Lunatic confined therein, he shall be guilty of a Misdemeanor, and shall be subjt-ct to Indictment for every such Offence, or to forfeit for every such Offence, on a summary Conviction thereof before Two Justices, any Sum not exceeding Twenty Pounds nor less than Two Pounds. Penalty on Officers, on Proof of such Notice and Recognizance having been given and entered into, shall in a summary W ay hear and determine such Appeal, oi-, if they think proper, adjourn the Hear- ing thereof until the next General or Quarter Sessions, and if they see Cause may reduce any Penalty or Forfeiture to not less than One Fourth of the Amout ini« posed by this Act, and may order any Money to be returned which shall have I een levied in pursuance of such Order or Determination, and may also award such further Satisfaction to be made to the Party injured, or such Costs to either of the Parties, as they shall judge reasonable and proper; and all such Determinations of the said General or Quarter Sessions shall be final, binding, and conclusive upon all Parties to all Intents and Purposes whatsoever. Council of every Borough to exercise the same Duties, H 2 as <3 1—1 ■BnonBAiasqo | •para 1 •paAOjduii^OK ■paAaqaa j 1 •pajaAoaaa rH G ■q:)B8a -10 'iBAOnt 1846: Sept. 1 1848: Dec. 2. 1853: Junes. a i •^OB^^V ?SJ!.^ no aSy ^ • ' Ot •S^tDEIIV N CO ■« snoiAaid 10 jaqmnKT ' .a III •snaaAi j _ •sqinoi\[ 1 -S< i • o •sjBax 1 • «> " 1 a ■s^oipi ^BjiuaSuog . •^ •gai^daiida ] ■ ^ •jCub jT 'asBasid JO arat;^ puB 'noiiipuoo iCyTpoff * ' h ]0 3snBf> pasoddna 1 i • « •japio -sid jB^nara jo mao j Melan- cliolia 1 •pauais raoqai • Xq pUB 'sa^Boyi^ -ja.-i iBDipaw 10 sajBa 1 ' jC!)uoq} tiya aiqB^ oturi •^uas 30qM % \ qaiqAS JO 'U :^aBqa 4SUBJ 'j£}nno3 : : \ s ■apoqv JO aoBia snoiAa.!^ ' •uoijBdnDDo snoiAaad puB 'ajti JO uoi^ipuoo Car- penter ■■§2 2 — paMopiM. . 1 •° •ai^utg r^ £ g ca 3 •pauaum , •a^v §3 S S E £ &< . "> ^ rt -H rH i Christian and Surname at Length. William Johnson William Johnson William Johnson c c C •notssinipv Jo a)B(i 1846: Jan. 3 1848: June 9 1852: May 6 • •UOISBIUIPV 1 rtNCO'J'XSWt^aO JO i-ipjo "I 'ov 1 sr iUB oua 1! '"<: ad IS issitupv t![ JO ajEfl 1 APPENDIX. 279 pi: C o K tf CD I 1 a to Age at Death. ^ a 1 S5 Assigned Cause of Death. Phthisis •6 5 .■( ai Removal, and to what Asylum, re- gistered Hospital, or licensed House. ^1 II e4 I 1 S 1 ' "3 > 1 P^ 1 S 1 ' -a s U (^ 1 1 S 1 ' 1 .2 03 E^ 1 S 1 ' P^ 1 a 1 - -. 1 CO ;^' I 1 1 g 1 ^ rH rt Christian and Surname at Length. William Johnson William Johnson William Johnson No. in Register of Patients. rt •* t» Date of last Admission. 1846: Jan. 3 1848: June 9 1852: May 6 Date of Death, Discharge, or Eemoval. 1846: Sept. 1 1818: Dee. 2 1853 : June 8 2S0 APPENDIX. SCHEDULE (G.) No. 3. Form of Medical Journal.* Date. Number of Patients. Patients who are, or since the last Entry have been, under Patients under Restraint or in Seclusion, ' Medical Treatment, when and for what Period, and and for what, if any, Reasons, and, in case of , bodily Disorder. Restraint, by what Means. Deaths, Injuries, and Violence to Patients since the last Entry. M. F. Males. Females. Males. Females. • * In the Case of an Asylum receiving' both Pauper and private Patients, a separate Journal to be kept in the above Form for each Class. ANNO DECIMO NONO & VICESIMO VICTORIA BEGINS. CAP, LXXXVII. An Act to amend the Lunatic Asylums Act, 1853. [29th July 1856.] BE it enacted by the Queen's most Excellent Majesty, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the Authority of the same, as follows : Recorder to appoint Two Justices to be Members of the Committee of Justices of the Cownty for providing an Asylum. I. Where a Committee is or shall hereafter be appointed to provide an Asylum for any County under the Lunatics Asylum Act, 1853, the Recorder of every Borough now or hereafter annexed to such County for the Purposes of the said Act shall, at the Grt-neral or Quarter Sessions next after sucl) Appointment as aforesaid, or where such Committee has been already appointed, shall, at the General or Quarter Sessions next after the passing' of this Act, appoint Two Justices of such Borough to be Members of such Committee. APPENDIX. 281 ANNO DECIMO OCTAVO & DECIMO NONO VICTORIiE REGIN.E. CAP. CV. An Act to amend the Lunatic Asylums Act, 1853, and the Acts passed in the Ninth and Seventeenth Years of Her Majesty, for the Regulation of the Care and Treatment of Lunatics. [14th August 1855.] BE it enacted by the Queen's most Excellent Majesty, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the Authority of the same, as follows : Any single County or Borough may unite with the Subscribers to a Hospital, and any Committee of Visitors of an existing Asylum may so unite. I. Section Three of the Lunatic Asylums Act, 1853, shall extend to empower the Justices of any One County or Borough to authorize any Committee of Jusiices elected for such County or Uorough thereunder to treat and enter into an Agree- ment for uniting with the Suijscribers to any such Hospital as therein mentioned, and it shall not be necessary that any other County or Borough be a Party to such Agreement ; and Section Five of the said Aco shall extend to empower any such Committee of Visitors as therein mentioned to enter into an Agreement for uniting with the Subscribers to any such Hospital alone. The Proportion of Expenses between any County and Borough may be fixed with reference to Accommodation likely to be required. JI. When Two or more Committees agree to unite under the Lunatic Asylums Act, 1853, or under that Act as amended by this Act, the Proportion in which the Expenses of carrying into execution liie Purposes of the said Act shall be charged upon and raised by each County and Borough so uniting may be calculated and fixed according to the Extent of the Accommodation which in the Judgment of the Committees entering into such Agreement will be required for the Pauper Liinaiics of such County and Borough respectively ; and the Power in Section Sixteen of the Lunatic Asylums Act, 1853, ot repealing or altering the iStipulalions of any Agreement for uniting, shall extend to authorize the Alteration thereof by readjusting the Proportions in which the Expenses aloresaid shall be chargetl on each County and Borough and the Subscribeis (if any) uniting, or any of the said I'arties, and, where the Committee of Visitors think fit, by fixing as aforesaid, acconling to the probable Extent of Accommodation required, the Proportion in which each County and Borough is to contribute to such Expenses ; and where the Proportions of any Contributions are fixed according to the probable Extent of Accommodation required as aforesaid the Agreement shall specify that such Pro- portions are fixed according to that Basis. Agreements for uniting to be hereafter entered into to stiptulate for Contnbution by Counties and Boroughs according to their relative Populations Jor the lime being, where not fixed according to foregoing Provision. III. Where an Agreement for uniting is hereafter entered into under the Lunatic Asylums Act, 1S53, or under that Act as amended by this Act, and the Proportion in which the Expenses of carrying the Purposes of the said Act into execution are to be charged upon each County and liorough is not tixed, under the foregoing Provision, with ruierence to the probable Extent of Accommodation required, tiie Agreement shall stipulate that such Expenses, or, where any Com- mittee of Subscribers of a Lunatic Hospital are a Party to the Agreement, then that the aggregate Amount to be contributed by the Counties and Boroughs towards such Expenses, shall be from Time to Time charged upon and raised by the Counties and Boroughs in proportion to their respective Populations as stated 282 APPENDIX. in the last Return for the Time being made of the same under the Authority of Parliament, and such Agreement shall be varied from the Form in Schedule (A.) to the Lunatic Asylums Act, 1853, accordingly. Where Expenses are to he contributed in proportion to Population, the same to he ascertained hy last Census for the Time being. IV. Where an Agreement for uniting has been already entered into under the Lunatic Asylums Act, 1853, or any former Act, the Expenses of carrying into execution any such Act, or, where any Committee of Subscribers is a Party to tlie Agreement, the aggregate Amount to be contributed by such Counties and Boroughs, shall be from Time to Time charged upon and raised by the Countits and Boroughs united in proportion to their respective Populations as stated in the last Return for the Time being made of the same under the Authority of Parlia- ment, save where such Expenses are adjusted and fixed under the foregoing Provi- sion according to the probable Extent of Accommodation required. Where there is a Dissolution of a Union a new Asylum to be provided. V. To the Intent that due Provision may be made for the Reception and Care of the Pauper Lunatics of Counties and Boroughs Parties to Unions upcm tlie Dissolution of such Unions, the Justices of every County and Borough united (either alone or with any Subscribers) shall, before any Dissolution of their Union takes effect, at a General or Quarter Sessions for such County, or at a Special Meeting of the Justices of such Borough, (as the Case may require,) elect a Committee to provide an Asylum for their County or Borough, and authorize such Committee to proceed for that Purpose in manner by the Lunatic Asylums Act, 1853, provided in the Case of a County or Borough not having an Asylum ; and all the Provisions of the said Act and this Act applicable to a Committee elected to provide an Asylum in the Case of a County or Borough not having an Asylum shall be applicable to the Committee elected under this Provision. Provisions to apply to Councils of Boroughs where they have tahen upon themselves the Execution of the Lunatic Asylums Act, 1853. VI. Where the Council of a Borough has taken upon itself, under the Lunatic Asylums Act, 1853, or the Act of the Session holden in the Eighth and Ninth Years of Her Majesty, Chapter One hundred and twenty-six, the Duties, Powers, and Authorities imposed or conferred upon or given to the Justices of the Borough, such Council sliall be subject to and have and exercise the Duties, Powers, and Authorities b}' this Act imposed or conferred upon the .Justices of a Borough, or any Committee elected by them ; and such Council may confer upon any Com- mittee appointed by them such of the said Duties, Powers, and Authorities as under this Act are or may bo conferred upon a Committee elected by the Justices of a Borough; and where the Council of a Borough had before the Commencement of the Lunatic Asylums Act, 1853, taken upon itself under the said Act of the Eighth and Ninth Years of Her Majesty, Chapter One hundred and twenty-six, the Duties, Powers, and Authorities imposed or conferred upon or given to the Justices of the Borough, such Council shall, from the Commencement of the Lunatic Asylums Act, 1853, be deemed to have been subject to and to have had the Duties, Powers, and Authorities by that Act imposed or conferred upon the Justices of a Borough, or any Committee elected by them, and to have been authorized to confer upon any Committee appointed by such Council such of the said Duties, Powers, and Authorities as under such Act may be conferred upon a Committee elected by the Justices of a Borough. Places hecoming Boroughs after the Commencement of the Lunatic A sylums A ct, 1853, to he deemed Boroughs annexed to the Counties in which they are situate. VII. Any Place which has become a Borough within the Definition contained in Section One hundred and thirty-two of the Lunatic Asylums Act, 1853, since, APPKNDIX. 283 the Commencomeiit of that Act, shall, from ami after the jiassing of this Act, be deemed to be a Borough annexed to the County in which the Haiue is situate, and any Place which after the passing of this Act becomes a Borougli within such Definition shall, from and after the Time of becoming such Borou^d), be deemed a Boroui'h so annexed, and the Provisions contained in Section Nine in the Lunatic Asylums Act, 1853, for the Appointment of Two Justices of a Borough annexed thereunder to a County to be Members of the (Committee of Visitors of the Asylum of such County, and in relation to the Contribution by sucli Borough to tlie Expenses of the Asylum of such County, shall extend to any Borough annexed under this Enactment. Powers given by Sect. 77. of Lunatic Asylums Act, 1853, to Visitors of an Asylum to order Removal of Pauper Lunatics extended. VIII. The Power given by Section Seventy-seven of the Lunatic Asylums Act, 1853, to any Two of the Visitors of any Asylum, being Justices, to order any Pauper Lunatic ctiargeable to any Parish or Union within the County or Borough, or any County or Borough to which such Asylum wholly or in part belongs, or to any such County, and who may be confined in any other Asylum, or in any registered Hospital or licensed House, to be removed to such first- mentioned Asylum, shall be extended so as to authorize such Visitors to order any Pauper Lunatic chargeable to any Parish or Union within any County or Borough, or to any County for the Reception of the Pauper Lunatics whereof into such first mentioned A-ylum there is a suljsisting Contract, anil who may be confined as aforesaid, to be removed to such first-mentioned Asylum, and also to order any such Pauper Lunatic as herein-before mentioned to be removed from such first-mentioned Asylum to any Asylum, registered Hospital, or licensed House, subject nevertheless to the Restriction contained in Section Seventy-eight of the Lunatic Asylums Act, 1853. Powers of Commissioners and Visitors to continue applicable to a House which has been licensed after Expiration of Licence, while any Patients arc therein. IX. The Powers of the Commissioners and Visitors under the Lunatic Asylums Act, IS.IS, and the Acts of the Eighth and Ninth Years of Her Majesty, Chapter One hundred, and the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Years of Hur ]\Lijesty, Chapter Ninety-six, with reference to any licensed House and the Inmates thereof, and all Powers and Provisions of the said Acts having reference to the Discharge, Removal, and Transfer of such Inmates, shall, alter the Expiration or Revocation of any Licence granted in respect of such House, continue in force for all Purposes, so long as any Lunatics are detained therein, in the same Manner as if the Licence subsisted. Contracts under Forty-second Section of Lunatic Asylums Act, 1853, may be renewed. X. Whereas Doubts have been entertained whether under the Forty-second Section of the Lunatic Asylums Act, 18.)3, a Contract for the Reception of Pauper Lunatics thereby authorized can be renewed : Be it declared and enacted. That upon or after the Expiration or other Determination of any Contract for any of the Purposes of the said Section it shall be lawful for every Committee of Visitors, under and subject to the several Provisions of the said Act applicable thereto, from Time to Time to enter into a new Contract for any of the Purposes men- tioned in the said Section with the Committee of Visitors of any Asylum, or with the Subscribers to any Hospital registered or the Proprietor of any House licensed for the Reception of Lunatics, and for the Committee of Visitors of any Asylum, or the Subscribers to any registered Hospital or the Proprietor of any licensed House, to contract with any Committee of Visitors accordingly. Provision for Burial of Pauper Lunatics. XI. Where the Visitors of Lunatic Asylums for Counties and Boroughs in England, or any of their Officers duly authorized in that Behalf, shall undertake 284 APPENDIX. the Burial of any Pauper Lunatic, and tlie Burial cannot take place in the Parish where the Death shall have taken place b}' reason of the public Buiial Ground of * such Parish having been closed, and no other having been provided, or where, in consequence of the crowded State of such Burial Ground, the Visitors as aforesaid are of opinion tliat the Burial of such dead Body therein would be improper, it shall be lawfid to bury such Body in a public Burial Ground of or in some other Parish as near as conveniently may be to the Parish wherein the Death shall have taken place, with the Consent of the Minister and Churchwardens of such Parish : Pro- vided, that in all Cases of Burial under the Direction of the Visitors or their Officers as aforesaid the Fee or Fees payable by the Custom of the Place where the Burial maj^ be, or under the Provisions of any Act of Parliament shall be paid by the said Visitors for the Burial of each such Body to the Person or Persons who by such Custom or under such Act of Parliament shall be entitled to receive such Fee or Fees. Power to enter into Agreements with Cemetery Comimny or Burial Board. XII. The Visitors of Lunatic Asylums in England may fiom Time to Time enter into Agreements with the Proprietors of any Cemetery established under the Authority of Parliament, or with any Burial Board duly constituted under the Statutes in that Behalf for tlie Burial of the dead Bodies of any Pauper Lunatics which such Visitors may undertake to bury ; and thereupon the Burial of any such Body, under the Directions of the said Visitors or their Officer, in such Ceme- tery, or in the Burial Ground of such Burial Board, shall be lawful : Provided, however, that no such Agreement shall be valid unless made in such Form and with such Stipulations as the Commissioners in Lunacy shall approve. Committee of Visitors may convey Land for Burial Ground for Lunatics, die. dying in the Asylum. XITI. And whereas it is expedient that Burial Grounds should be provided for Persons dying in any County or Borough Lunatic Asylum built or to be built under the Authority of any Act of Parliament for the Reception of Pauper Lunatics : Be it therefore enacted, That it shall be lawful for every Committee of Visitors of any County or Borough Lunatic Asylum, or for any Trustees or Trustee in whom any Land shall be vested for the Purposes of an Asylum, with the previous Consent of One of Her Majesty's Principal Secretaries of State under his Hand, to give, grant, and convey to Her Majesty's Commissioners for building new Cliurches, and it shall be lawful for them to accept, any Portion not exceeding Two Statute Acres of any Land which belongs to or has been or may be purchased for any such Asjluiii, for the Purpose of Consecration as a Burial Ground for Pauper or other Lunatics or Officers or Servants dying in such Asylum, and that in all such Cases the Freehold of every Burial Ground, of which Her Majesty's said Commissioners shall accept a Conveyance under the Provisions of this Act for the Purpose of Consecration, shall, after the same Burial Ground shall have been conscrated, vest in the Visitors or Trustees or Trustee, as the Case may be, for the Time being of the County or Borough Lunatic Asylum to which such Burial Ground shall belong, and be for ever thereafter exclusively appropriated for the Burial of Pauper and other Lunatics dying in such Asylum, and of the Officers and Servants belonging to such Asylum and dying therein ; and that from and a'ter the Consecration of such Land the Incumbent of the Parish in which such Burial Ground is situate shall not be entitled to any Fee for the Interment therein of any Pauper or other Lunatic dying in such Asylum, or of any of the Officers and Servants belonging to such Asylum and dying therein. Pauper Lunatics, vjhose Settlements cannot be ascertained, where found in a Borough which does not contribute to the County Expenditure, to be chargeable to such Borough. XIV. And whereas Doubts are entertained as to the Chargeability of Pauper Lunatics found in Boroughs whose Settlements cannot be ascertained, and it is expedient to remove such Doubts : APPENDIX. 28o Section Three of the Act of the Session holden in the Twelfth and Thirteentli Years of Her Majesty, Chapter Eiglity-two, shall be repealed ; and where any Pauper Lunatic is not settled in the Parish by which or at the Instance of some Officer or Officiating Clergyman of which he is sent to an Asylum, registered Hospital, or licensed House, and it, cannot be ascertained in what Parish such Pauper Lunatic is settled, and such Lunatic was found in a BorouL;h having a separate Court of Quarter Sessions of the Peace, and which is not liable, under the Act of the Session holden in the Fifth and Sixth Years of King WtUiaia the Fourth, Chapter Seventy-six, Section One hundred and seventeen, to the Payment of a Proportion of the Sums expended out of the County Rate, such Lunatic may be adjudged to be chargeable to such Borough by any Two Justices of such Borough ; and it shall not be lawful for any Justices to adjudge such Lunatic to be chargeable to any County, nor to make any Order upon the Treasurer of any County for the Payment of any Expenses whatsoever incurred or to be incurred in respect of the said Lunatic ; and all tlie Provisions in the Lunatic Asylums Act, 1853, as to the Mode of detennining that a Pauper Lunatic is chargeab'e to a County, and as to the Order to be made for the Maintenance of such Pauper Lunatic, shall extend and be applied to such Borough, as fully and effectually, to all Intents and Purposes, as if all the said Provisions were repeated and re-enacted in this Act, and made applicable to such Borough, in the same ^Manner in all respects as though for the Purposes of this Provision such Borough were a separate and distinct County. Seals of Commissioners, Visitors, and Justices, to Orders, aw at Westminster, and the Question in such Issue shall be, whetlier the alleged insane Person is of unsound Mind and incapable of managing himself or his Affairs ; and the Provisions of the said Act with i-espect to Commissions of Luiiacj', and Orders for Inquiry to be tried i)y a Jury, and the Trial thereof, and the Constitution of the Jury, shall apply to any Issue to lie directed as aforesaid, and the Trial thereof, and suliject thereto such Issue and the Trial thereof shall be regula'ed by the Act of the Eighth and Ninth Years of the Reign of Her present Majosty, Chapter One hundred and nine, intituled An Act to amend the Law concerninr/ Games and Wagers, and the Verdict upon any such Issue finding the alleged insane Person to be of unsound Mind and incapable of managing himself or his Affairs, shall have the same Force to all Intents and Purposes as an Inquisition under a Commission of Lunacy, findino: a Person to be of unsound Mind and incapable of managing himself or his Affairs, returned into the Court of Chancery. Reference in other Acts to Inquisition to apply to Verdict on Issue. 5. Where in any Act of Parliament, Order, Rule of Court, or Instrument Reference is made to a Commission of Lunacy, or the Inquisition thereon, the Issue hereby authorized to be directed, and the Verdict thereon, oper.itingas an Inquisi- tion, shall be deemed to be intended by or comprehended in the Reference. Examination of alleged Lunatic on the holding of the Inquisition. 6. On the Trial of every such Issue as last aforesaid the alleged insane Person shall, if he is within the Jurisdiction, be examined before the taking of the Evidence is commenced, and at the Close of the Proceedings, before the Jury consult as to thwir Verdict, unless the presiding Judge shall otherwise direct; and such Examina- tions of the alleged insane Person shall take place either in open Court or in private as such Judge shall direct. Ao Traverse of an Inquisition made by One of the Judges of the Superior Courts and by a Jury to be granted, but new Trial may be ordered by the Lord Chancellor. 7. No Person shall be entitled to a Traverse of any Inquisition made under any such Order as aforesaid uj)on the Oath of a Jury ; but it shall be liwful for the Lord Chancellor intrusted as aton said, if he shall think fit, u]>on a Petition being presented to him vi-ithin Three Months next after the Trial of any such Issue, to order tli it a new Trial shall be had of such Issue or a new Inquiry made as to the Insanity of such Person, sul)ject to such Directions and upon such Conditions as to the Lord Chancellor intrusted as aforesaid may seem proper. Sections One hundred and forty-eight. One hundred and forty-nine, and One hundred and fifty of the said Act (which Sections relate to Peiitioiis and Orders for the Traverse of Inquisitions) shall not apply to any Case coming within the last preceding Section of this Act. Section One hundred and fifty-one of the said Act shall apply to all Proceedings tak'-n, Orilers made, and Things done, pending a new Trial or new Inquiry or the Petition for the same, in the same Manner as is provided by the said Section with respect to such Matters pending a Traverse or the Petition for the same. 288 APPENDIX. Demand of Inquiry by Jury. 8. And with Reference to Inquiries before the Master without a Jury, and the Right of the alleged Lunatic to demand an Inquiry by a Jury, be it enacted, upon the Hearing of any Petition for Inquiry it shall be lawful for the alleged Lunatic, by himself, his Council or Solicitor, orally, or by Petition addressed to the Lord Chancellor intrusted as aforesaid, to demand an Inquiry by a Jury, and such Demand shall have the same Effect as if made by Notice filed with the Registrar in accordance with the Provisions of the said Act. Demand of Inquiry by Jury may be withdrawn. 9. Upon such Hearing the alleged Lunatic may, by himself, his Counsel or Solicitor, orally, or by Petition as aforesaid, withdraw any Notice of demanding an Inquiry by a Jury previously filed by him. Commission may be superseded on Conditions. 10. And with respect to the superseding of Commissions, be it enacted. That if., it shall appear to the Lord Chancellor that it is not expedient or for the Benefit " of the Lunatic that the Commission should be unconditionally superseded, but that same should be superseded on Terms an^ Conditions, he may, upon the Consent of the Lunatic and such other Persons, if any, whose Consent he may deem necessary, order the Commission to be superseded upon such Terms and Conditions as he shall think proper ; and all the Provisions contained in " The Lunacy Regulation Act, 1853," in relation to the superseding of the Commission in Cases where a Traverse has been applied for, and to the Proceedings for the fulfilling of such Terms and Conditions, shall apply to all Cases in which the Commission shall be superseded upon Terms and Conditions under the Provisions herein contained. Lord Chancellor may order Costs. IL It shall be lawful for the Lord Chancellor intrusted as aforesaid to order the Costs, Charges, and Expenses of and incidental to the Presentation of any Petition for a C mmission in the Nature of a Writ de lunatico inquirendo, or for any Order of Inquiry under "The Lunacy Regulation Act, 1853," and of and incidental to the Prosecution of any Inquiiy, Inquisition, Issue, Traverse or other Proceeding consequent upon such Commission or Order, to be paid either by the Party or Parties who shall have presented such Petition, or by the Party or Parties opposing such Petition, or out of the Estate of the alleged Lunatic, or partly in one way and partly in another, as the Lord Chancellor intrusted as afore- said shall in each Case think proper ; and such Order shall have the same Force and Effect as Orders for the Payment of Money made by the High Court of Chancery in Cases within its Jurisdiction. As TO Property of insane Persons when op small Amodnt. Power to Lord Chancellor, where Property of Lunatic does not exceed lOOOZ. in Value, or 501. per Annum, to apply it for his Benefit in a summary Manner, without Inquisition. In order that the Property of insane Persons when the same is of small Amount may be applied for their Benefit in a summary and inexpensive Manner, be it enacted as follows : 12. Where, by the Report of One of the Masters in Lunacy or of the Com- missioners in Lunacy, or by Affidavit or otherwise, it is established to the Satisfac- tion of the Lord Chancellor intrusted as aforesaid that any Person is of unsound Mind anil incapaljle of managing his Affairs, and that his Property does not exceed One thousand Pounds in Value, or that the Income thereof does not exceed Fifty Pounds per Annum, the Lord Chancellor intrusted as aforesaid may, without directing any Inquiry under a Commission of Lunacy, make such Order as he may consider expedient for the Purpose of rendering the Property of such Person, or APPENDIX. 289 the Income thereof, avaihxble for his Maintenance or Benefit or for carrying on his Trade or Business : Provided nevertheless, that the ailefjed insane Person shall have such jiersonal Notice of the Ajiplication for such Order as aforesaid as the Lord Chancellor shall by General Order to be made as after mentioned direct. Power to sell Land or other Property of Lunatic for his Benefit. 13. For the Purpose of giving effect to any such Order as is mentioned in the last preceding Section the Lord Chancellor intrusted as aforesaid may order any Land, Stock, or other Property of such Person as aforesaid to be sold, charged by way of Mortgage, or otherwise disposed of, and a Conveyance, Transfer, Charge, or other Disposition thereof to be executed or made by any Person on his Behalf, and may order the Proceeds of any such Sale, Charge, or other Disposition, or the Dividends or Income of such Land, Stock, or Property, to be paid to any' Relative of such insane Person, or to sucli other Person as it may be considered proper to trust with the A|iplication thereof, to be by him applied in the Maintenance or for the Benefit of the insane Person, or of him and his Family, either at tiie Discre- tion of such Relative or Person, or in such Manner, and subject to such Control, and with or without such Security for the Application thereof, as the Lord Chan- cellor intrusted as aforesaid may direct ; and for the Purpose above mentioned the Jjord Chancellor intrusted as aforesaid shall have all the same Powers with respect to the Transfer, Sale, and Disposition of, and otherwise respecting, the Real and Personal Property of such Person as aforesaid as if he had been found lunatic by Inquisition. Power to mahe General Orders, to carry into effect the Objects of the last preceding Section,. 14. The Lord Chancellor may from Time to Time make such General Orders as he may think fit for regulating the Procedure to be adopted and tiie Duties to be performed by the ^Masters and Officers in Lunacy for obtaining such Reports as aforesaid, and for carrying the Oljects of the Two last preceding Sections into effect, and for vesting in such Masters and Officers such Powers as the Lord Chan- cellor may consider expedient for the Purposes aforesaid. Power to apply Property of Persons acquitted on the Ground of Insanity for their Benefit. 15. Where any Person has, on the Trial of any Indictment, been acquitted on the Ground of Insanity, it shall lie lawful for the Lord Chancellor intrusted as aforesaid, on being satisfied by Affidavit or otherwise of the continued Insanity of such Person, and of his being still in Confinement, to make any such Order with respect to the Property of such Person, and the Application thereof for his Main- tenance or Benefit, or that of his Family, oi- for carrying on his Trade or Business, as is mentioned in the Three last preceding Sections of this Act. Charging Orders. Extending Powers of charging Lunatic's Property for his Maintenance, Debts, and Costs. And for the Purpose of extending the Powers over the Property of Lunatics given by Stction One hundred and sixteen of the said Act, be it enacted as follows : 16. Where it appears to the Lord Cliancellor intrusted as aforesaid to be for the Lunatic's Benefit, he may by Order direct any Estate or Interest of the Luna- tic in Land or Siock, either in po-session, reversion, remainder, contingency, or expectancy, and either existing or which may exist at any future Time, to stand and be charged with any Monies advanced or to be advanced, or due or to become due, to any Person for or in respect of any of the Purposes or Matters mentioned in the said Section, and either with or without Interest on such Monies ; and he may also by Order direct any such Estate and Interest to be deait with and dis- posed of in such Manner as he shall consider expedient for any of the Purposes U 290 APPENDIX. aioresaid, or for securing any Monies advanced or to be advanced for such Purposes or any of them, and with or without Interest for the same ; and everj' Charge and Disposition directed or made by or in pursuance of any such Order shall be valid and effectual to all Intents and Purposes and shall take effect accordingly, subject onl}' to any prior Charge to which the Estate or Interest affected thereby may at the Date of such Order he subject. General. A II Deeds, Transfers, Payments, &c. made in pursuance of tins A ct to he valid and binding. Indemnity to the Bank of England, dx. 17. Every Conveyance, Transfer, Charge, or other Disposition made or executed by virtue of this Act, and every Pnynient made in pursuance of this Act, shall be valid to all Intents, and binding upon all Persons whomsoever ; and this Act shall be a full Indemnity and Discharge to the Governor and Company of the Bank of England, their Officers and Servants, and all other Persons respectively, for all Acts and Things done or permitted to be done in pursuance thereof, or of any Order of the Lord Chancellor intrusted as aforesaid made or purporting to be made under this Act ; and such Acts and Things respectively shall not be questioned or in)peached in any Court of Law or Equity to their Detriment. Power to Masters to summon Witnesses. 18. To give further and better Effect to the Fifty-fifth, Fifty-sixth, and Sixtieth Sections of the said Act, respecting the Attendance of Witnesses before the said Masters, the JNIasters may in the Matter of any Lunatic or alleged Lunatic compel by Summons the Attendance of any Per.son to give Evidence before them, whether such Pei'son has or has not previously given Evidence by Affidavit ; and every Per- son so summoned shall be bound to attend as required by the Summons, and give Evidence before the said Masters in like Manner as is provided by the Sixtieth Section of the said Act in the Case of Persons who have given Evidence by Affi- davit. Visiting. Duties of Visitors. And with respect to the visiting of Lunatics, be it enacted as follows : lit. It shall be the Duty of the Visitors to visit Persons of unsound Mind within tlie Meaning of this Act at such Times and in such Potation and Manner, and to make such Inquiries and Investigations as to their Care and Treatment and mental and bodily Health, and the Arrangements for their Maintenance and Com- fort, iind otherwise respecting them, as the Lord Chancellor shall by General Orders, or as the Lord Chancellor intrusted as aforesaid shall by Special Order in any particular C'use from Time to Time direct. A II Lunatics to he visited Four Times a Year. 20. Provided always. That from and after the First Day of October next every Lunatic shall be [leisonally visited and sten by One of the said Visitors Four Times at least in every Year, and such Visits shall be so regulated as that the Interval between successive Visits to any such Lunatic shall in no Case exceed Four Months : Provided always, that Lunatics who are resident in licensed Houses, Asylums, or registered Hospitals shall not necessarily be visited by any of the said Visitors more than once in the Year, unless the Lord Chancellor intiusted as afore- said siiall otherwise direct. Visitors also to visit alleged Lunatics, and make a Report, y the Ma.ster of the Workhuuse such Oi)Serv.itions as they may think fit lo make respecting the Dietary, Accommodation, and Treatment of the Lunatics or alleged Lunatics for the Time being in the Workhouse of their Union or Parish, and the Book containing the Observations made in pursuance of this Section by the Visiting Guardians or Overseers shall be laid by the Master before the Commissioner or Commissioners on his or their next Visit. Miscellaneous Clauses. Patients may be permitted to be absent on Trial from Hospitals and Private Houses. 38. Section Eighty-six of the Lunacy Act, Chapter One hundred, and Section Seventeen of the Act Eighteenth and Nineteenth F/c^orm, Chapter One hundred and five shall extend to authorize the Proprietor or Superintendent of any licensed House or Hospital, with such Consent, and to be given on such Approval as thereby required, to permit any Patient to be absent from such Hospital or House upon Trial for such Period as may be thought fit : Two of the Commissioners, as regards any Hospital or any licensed House, and Two of the Committee of Governors of any Hospital, and Two of the V isiiors of any licensed House, as regards any licensed House within the Jurisdiction of Visitors, may of their own Authority permit any Pauper Patient therein to be absent from such Hospital or House upon Trial for such Period as they may think fit, and may make or order to be made an Allowance to such Pauper not ex(;eedin<' what would be the Charge for liim in such Hospital or House, which Allowance shall be charged for him and be payable as if he were actually in such Hospital or House, but shall be paid over to him, or for his Benefit, as the said Commissioners or Visitors may direct : In case any Person so allowed to be absent on Trial for any Period do not return at the Expiration thereof, and a Medical Certificate as to his State of Mind certifying that his Detention as a Lunatic is no longer necessary be not sent to the Proprietor or Superintendent of such licensed House or Hospiuil, he may at any Time within Fourteen Days after the Expiration of the same Period be retaken as in the Case of an Escape. 302 APPENDIX. Penalty on Officer conniving at the Escape of Lunatics. 39. If any Officer or Servant in any Hospital or licensed House through wilful Neglect or Connivance permits any Patient to escape from such Hospital or licensed House, or secretes or abets or connives at the Escape of any Patient from such Hospital or licensed House, he shall for every such Offence incur a Penalty not exceeding Twenty Pounds. Correspondence of Private Patients. 40. Every Letter written by a Private Patient in any Asylum, Hospital, or licensed House, or by any single Patient, and addressed to tlie Commissioners in Lunacy or Committee, or in the Case of Houses within the Jurisdiction of Visitors to the Visitors or any of them, shall, unless special Regulations to the contrary have been given by such Commissioners or Visitors, be forwarded unopened. Every Letter written by a Private Patient in any Asylum, Hospital, or licensed House, or by any single Patient, and addressed to any Person other than the Commissioners or Committee or Visitors or One of them, shall be forwarded to the Person to whom it is addressed, unless the Superintendent in the Case of an Asylum or Hospital, the Proprietor in the Case of a licensed House, and the Person having the Charge of a single Patient in the Case of a single Patient, pro- hibit the forwarding of such Letter, by Endorsement to that Effect under his Hand on the Letter, in which Case he shall lay all Letters so endorsed before the Visiting Commissioners, Committee, or Visitors, as the Case may be, on their next Visit. Any Superintendent, Proprietor, or Person in charge of a single Patient failing to comply with the Provisions of this Section as to laying any Letter before the Commissioners or Committee or Visitors that is not forwarded to the Address of the Peison to whom it is directed, or being privy to the Detention by any other Person of any Letter detained in contravention of this Section, shall incur a Penalty not exceeding Twenty Pounds in respect of each Offence ; and any Person detaining any Letter in contravention of this Section shall incur, in respect of each Letter so detained, a Penalty not exceeding Twenty Pounds. Statement as to Condition of single Patients. 41. Every Person having the Care or Charge of a single Patient shall in addition to the Notice required to be given by the Ninetieth Section of the Lunacy Act, Chapter One hundred, before the Expiration of Seven clear Days from the Day on which he has taken the Patient under his Care or Charge, transmit to the Commis- sioners a Statement of the Condition of the Patient, according to the Form in Schedule F. annexed to the said last-mentioned Act, such Statement to be signed by the Physician, Surgeon, or Apothecary visiting the Patient in pursuance of the Ninetieth Section of the Lunacy Act, Chapter One hundred. If any Person having the Care or Charge of a single Patient fails to transmit such Statement as aforesaid within such Time as is required by this Section he shall be guilty of a Misdemeanor. Commissioners empowered, to prescribe Forms, &c. of Medical Visitation Boole. 42. In the Case of single Patients the Commissioners may from Time to Time make Regulations as to the Form of and the Particulars to be entered in the " Medical Visitation Book," required to be kept by the Ninetieth Section of the Lunacy Act, Chapter One hundied, and if the Person having the Care or Charge of a single Patient fails to comply with the Regulations so made he shall in respect of each Offence incur a Penalty not exceeding Five Pounds. Discharge of a Private Patient. 43. If there be no Person capable or qualified, under Section Seventy-two or Section Seventy-three of the said Lunacy Act, Chapter One hundred, to direct the Discharge or Removal of any such Patient as therein mentioned from any rei^istered Hospital or licensed House, the Commissioners may order the Dis- charge or Removal of such Patient, as they may think fit. ArPENDix. 303 Report to Coroner of Death of single Patient. 44. The Superintendent of every Asylum, and every Person having the Care or Charge of a single Patient, shall, in the event of the Death of any Patient, transmit to the Coroner of the Coun I y or Borough the same Statement as is required by Law to be transmitted in the Case of the Death of any Patient in any Hospital or licensed House, and if such Coroner, after receiving such Statement, thinlvs that anv reasonable Suspicion attends the Cause and Circumstances of the Death of such Patient, he shall summon a Jury to inquire into the Circumstances of such Death. Any Superintendent or Person in charge who makes default in complying with the Requisitions of this Section shall be guilty of a Misdemeanor. Chargeahility of Pauper Lunatics vjhose Settlements cannot be cuscertained where found in certain Boroughs. 45. Section Fourteen of the Act of the Session holden in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Years of Her Majesty, Chapter One hundred and five, shall be repealed, and in lieu thereof be it enacted. Where any Pauper Lunatic is not settled in the Parish by which or at the Instance of some Officer or Officiating Clergyman of which he is sent to an Asylum, registered Hos[)ital, or licensed House, and it cannot be ascertained in what Parish such Pau])er Lunatic is settled, and such Lunatic is found in a Borough which has a separate Court of Sessions of the Peace, and is not liable, under the Act of the Session holden in the Fifth and Sixth Years of King William the Fourth, Chapter Seventy-six, Section One hun- dred and seventeen, to the Payment of a Proportion of the Sums ex[)ended out of the County Rate, or is found in any Borough which under the Act of tlie Session holden in the Twelfth and Thirteenth Years of Her Majesty, Chapter Eighty-two, is exempted from Liability to contribute to the Pajment of the Expenses incurred for maintaining Pauper Lunatics chargeable to the County in which such Borough is situate, such Lunatic shall be adjudged to be chargeable to the Borough in which he is found ; and it shall not be lawful for any Justices to adjudge such Lunatic to be chargeable to any County, nor to make any Order upon the Treasurer of any County for the Payment of any Expenses whatsoever incurred or to be incurred in respect of such Lunatic. All the Provisions in the Lunacy Act, Chapter Ninety-seven, as to the Mode of determining that a Pauper Lunatic is chargeable to a County, and as to the Orders to be made for Payment of Expenses and other Monies in respect of such Lunatic, and for the Repayment thereof to the Treasurer of a County, shall extend to the Case of a Borough to which a Lunatic is made chargeable under this Section as if the said Provisions were re-enacted in this Act, and such Borough were therein mentioned or referred to instead of a County. Amendment o/ 8 ersons before assuming such title should lie duly examined as to their skill and knowledge by competent persons, and that a register should be kept by some legally authorized officer of all such persons : And whereas fur the purpose aforesaid, and for extending tiie benefits which have already resulted from tlie said Charter of Incorporation, it is desirable that additional powers sliould be granted for regulating the qualificatitHis of persons who may carry on the business of phar- maceutical cliemists : Be it enacted by the Queen's most excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, Charter, dated 18th Feb. 1843, confirmed, save as altered. I. That the said Charter of Incorporation granted to the said society on the eighteenth day oi February one thousand eight hundred and forty-three, save and except such part or parts thereof as are hereby altered, varied, or repealed, shall X •306 APPENDIX. be and tbe same is herebj- con6rmed and declared to be in full force and virtue, and shall be as good and eifectual to all intents and purposes as if this Act had not been passed. Power to Council to alter Byelaws, provided they are approved by a General Meeting of Society and the Secretary of State. TI. The council of the said Pharmaceutical Society shall be and the same are hereby authorized and empowered to alter and amend tliC byelaws of the said society made and established under or in pursuance of the s:iid Charter of Incor- ])oration, and to make and establish such new or additional byelaws as thej shall deem j)roperand necesins to conduct all such examinations as are provided for or contemplated by this Act, and shall respectively have full power and authoi-ity and are hereby authorized and empowered to examine all persons who shall present themselves for examination under the provisions of this Act in their knowledge of the Latin language, in botany, in materia meJica, and in pharmaceutical and general chemistry, and such other subjects as may from time to time be determined by any byelaw ; provided always, that such examinations shall not include the theory and practice of medicine, suigery, or midwifery ; and the said examiners are hereby empowered to grant or refuse to such perse ms, as in their discretion may seem fit, certificates of competent skill and knowledge and qu;ilification to exercise the business or calhng of pharmaceutical chemists, or, as the ca--e may require, to be engaged or employed as students, apprentices, or assistants respectively. Examiners to he appointed for Scotland. IX. And to enable the said society to provide for the examination in Scotland of such students, apprentices, or assistants in Scotland as may desire to be ex- amined there, it sliall be lawful for the council of the society, and they are hereby required, to appoint such fit and proper persons in Scotland, to meet in Edinburgh or Glasgoi", or such other place or places as the council may think desirable, and to conduct there all such examinations as are provided tor and contemplated by this Act, with such and the like powers and authorities in respect thereof as are herein conferred, and to gi-ant to the persons to be so examined such and the like certificates as are herein-before specified and reierred to, or to refuse the same ; and all the provisions of this Act shall be equally applicable to the examiners, examinations, and parties examined in Scotland as to the examiners, examinations, and parties examined in England. PerKons who have obtained Certificates entitled to be registered ; Persons registered as Pharmaceutical Chemists eligible to be Members ; Eligibility of Persons registered as Assistants, proval shall be advertised in the London Gazette, and on the expiration of one month from such advertisement the article named in such resolution shall be deemed to be a poison within the meaning of this Act. 310 APPENDIX. Chemists and Druggists within the Meaning of this Act. 3. Chemists and druggists within the meaning of this Act shall consist of all persons who at anj' time before the passing of this Act have carried on in Great Britain the business of a chemist and druggist, in the keeping of open shop for the compounding of the prescriptions of duly qualified medical practitioners, also of all assistants and associates who before the passing of this Act shall have been duly- registered under or according to the provisions of the Pharmacy Act, and also of all such persons as may be duly registered under this Act. Apprentices and A ssistants to be registered, 4. Any person who at the time of the passing of this Act shall be of full age, and shall produce to the registrar, on or before the thirty- first day of December one thousand eight hundred and sixty-eight, certificates according to Schedule (E.) to this Act that he had been for a period of not less than three years actually en- gaged and employed in the dispensing and com pounding of prescriptions as an assistant to a pharmaceutical chemist, or to a chemist and druggist as defined by clause three of this Act, shall, on passing such a modified examination as the council of the Pharmaceutical Society with the consent of the Privy Council may declare to be sufficient evidence of his skill and competency to conduct the business of a chemist and druggist, be registered as a chemist and druggist under this Act. Registration of Chemists and Druggists. 5. The persons who at the time of the passing of this Act shall have been duly admitted pharmaceutical chemists, or shall be chemists and druggists within the meaning of the Act, shall be entitled to be registered under the Act without paying any fee for such registration : Provided^ however, as regards any such chemist and druggist, that his claim to be registered must be by notice in writing, signed by him, and given to the registrar, with certificates according to the Schedules (C.) and (D.) to this Act ; and provided also, that for any such registration of a chemist and druggist, unless it be duly claimed by him on or before the thirty-first day of December one thousand eight hundred and sixty-eight, the person registered shall pay the same fee as persons admitted to the register after examination under this Act. Examiners under Pharmacy Act to be the Examiners under this Act. Certificate of competent Skill, d;c. 6. All such persons as shall from time to time have been appointed to conduct examinations under the Pharmacy Act shall be and are hereby declared to be examiners for the purposes ot this Act, and are hereby empowered and required to examine all such persons as shall tender themselves for examination under the provisions of this Act ; and every person who shall have been examined by such examiners, and shall have obtained from them a certificate of competent skill and knowledge and qualification, shall be entitled to be registered as a chemist and druggist under this Act ; and the examination aforesaid shall be such as is provided under the Pharmacy Act for the purposes of a qualification to be registered as assistant under that Act, or as the same may be varied from time to time by any byelaw to be made in accordance with the Pharmacy Act as amended by this Act; provided that no person shall conduct any examination for the purposes of this Act until his appointment has been approved by the Privy Council ; and such appoint- ment and approval shall not in any case be in force for more than five years ; more- over it shall be the duty of the said Pharmaceutical Society to allow any officer appointed bv the said Privy Council to be present during the progress of any exa- mination held for the purposes of this Act. Application of Fees to Purpose of Pharmaceutical Society. 7. Upon every such examination and registration as aforesaid such fees shall be payable as shall from time to time be fixed and determined by any byelaw to be made in accordance with the J^harmacy Act as amended by this Act, and shall be paid to the treasurer of the said society for the purposes of the said society. APPENDIX. 311 Retjistrar under Pharmacy Act to he so under this Act. 8. Theregistrar appointed or to be appointed under or by virtue of the Pharmacy Act shall be registrar fur the purposes of this Act. Council of Phitrmaceutlcal Society to make Orders for regulating Register to be kept. 9. The council of the Pharmaceutical Society shall, with all convenient speed after the passing of this Act, and from time to time as occasion may require, make orders or regulations for regulating the register to be kept under this Acd as nearly as conveniently may be in accordance with the form set forth in the Schedule (B. ) to this Act or to the like effect, and such register shall be called the Register of Chemists and Druggists. DiUy of Registrar to make and keep Register. 10. It shall be the duty of the registrar to make and keep a correct register, in accordance with the provisions of this Act, of all persons who shall be entitled to be registered under this Act, and to erase the names of all registered persons who shall have died, and fi-om time to time to make the necessary alterations in the addresses of the per.^ons registered under this Act : to enable the registrar duly to fulfil the duties imposed upon him, it shall be lawful for the registrar to write a letter to any registered person, addressed to him according to his address on the register, to inquire whether he has ceased to carry on business or has changed his residence, such letter to be forwarded by post as a registered letter, according to the Post Office regulations for the time being, and if no answer shall be returned to such letter within the period of six months from the sending of the letter, a second, of similar purport, shall be sent in like manner, and if no answer be given thereto within three months from the date thereof it shall be lawful to erase the name of such person from the register: Provided alway.", that the same may be restored by direction of the council of the Pharmaceutical Society should they think fit to make an order to that effect. Notice of Death of PharmaceiUical Chemist or Chemist and Druggist to be given by Registrars. 11. Every registrar of deatlis in Great Britain, ou receiving notice of the death of any Pharmaceutical chemist, or chemist and druggist, shall forthwith transmit by post to the registrar under the Pharmacy Act a certificate under his own h lud of such death, with the particulars of the time and place of death, and on the receipt of such certificate the said registrar under the Pharmacy Act shall erase the name of such deceased pharmaceutical chemist, or chemist and druggist, from the register, and shall transmit to the said registrar of deaths the cost of such cer- tificate and trausmission, and may charge the cost thereof as an expense of his office. Evidence of Qualification to he given before Registration. 12. No name shall be entered in the register, except of persons authorized by this Act to be registered, nor unless the registrar be satisfied by the pro[)er evidence that the person claiming is entitled to be registered ; and any appeal from the decision of the registrar may be decided by the council of the Pharmaceutical Society ; and any entry which shall be proved to the satisfaction of such council to have been fraudulently or incorrectly made may be erased from or amended in the register by order in writing of such council. Annual Register to he published and he Evidence. 13. The registrar shall, in the month of January in every year, cause to be printed, published, and sold a correct register of the names of all pharmaceutical chemists, and a correct register of all persons legistered as chemists and druggists, aud in such registers respectively the names shall be in alphabetical order accord 312 APPENDIX. in^ to the surnames, with the respective residences, in the form set forth in Schedule (B ) to this Act, or to the like effect, of all persons appearing on the register of pharmaceutical chemists, and on the register of chemists and druggists, on the thirty-first day of December last preceding, and such printed registers shall be called ■'The Registers of Pharmaceutical Chemists and Chemists and Druggists," and a printed copy of such registers for the time being, purporting to be so printed and published as aforesaid, or any certificate under the hand of the said registrar, and countersigned by the president or two members of the council of the Pharmaceu- tical Society, shall be evidence in all courts, and before all justices of the peace and others, that the persons therein specified are registered according to the pro- visions of the Pharmacy Act or of this Act, as the case may be, and the absence of the name of any person from such printed register shall be evidence, until the contrary shall be made to appear, that such person is not registered according to the provisions of the Pharmacy Act or of this Act. Penalty on wilful Falsification of Register, or for dbtedniny Registration hy false Representation. 14. Any registrar who shall wilfully make or cause to be made any falsifi- cation in any matter relating to the said registers, and any person who shall wilfully procure or attempt to procure himself to be registered under the Pharmacy Act or under this Act, by making or producing or causing to be made or produced any false or fraudulent representation or declaration, either verbally or in writing, and any pei'sou aiding or assisting him therein, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor in England, and in Scotland of a crime or oifence punishable by fine or imprison- ment, and shall on conviction thereof be sentenced to be imprisoned for any terra not exceeding twelve months. Protection of Titles, and Restrictions on Sale of Poisons. 15. From and after the thirty-fii-st day of December one thousand eight hun- dred and sixty-eight any person who shall sell or keep an open shop for the retailing, dispensing, or compounding poisons, or who shall take, use, or exhibit the name or title of chemist and druggist, or chemist or druggist, not being a duly registered pharmaceutical chemist, or chemist and druggist, or who shall take, use, or exhibit the name or title pharmaceutical chemist, pharmaceutist, or pharmacist, not being a pharmaceutical chemist, or shall fail to conform with any regulation as to the keep- ing or selling of poisons made in pursuance of this Act, or who shall compound any medicines of the British Pharmacopoeia except according to the formularies of the said Pharmacopoeia, shall for every such offence be liable to pay a penalty or sum of five pounds, and the same may be sued for, recovered, and dealt with in the manner provided by the Pharmacy Act for the recovery of penalties under that Act ; but nothing in this Act contained shall prevent any person from being liable to any other penalty, damages, or punishment to which he would have been sub- ject if this Act had not passed. Reserving Rights of certain Persons. 16. Nothing herein-before contained shall extend to or interfere with the business of any legally qualified apothecary or of any member of the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons of Great Britain, nor with the making or dealing in patent medicines, nor with the business of wholesale dealers in supplying poisons in the ordinary course of wholesale dealing ; and upon the decease of any pharmaceutical chemist or chemist and druggist actually in business at the time of his death it shall be lawful for any executor, administrator, or trustee of the estate of such pharmaceutical chemist or chemist and druggist to continue such business if and so long only as such business shall be bond fide conducted by a duly qualified assistant, and a duly qualified assistant within the meaning of this clause shall be a pharmaceutical chemist or a chemist and ilruggist registered by the registrar under the Pharmacy Act or this Act ; Provided always, that registration under this Act shall not entitle any person so registered to practice medicine or surgery, or any branch of medicine or surgery. APPENDIX. 313 ^ Regulations to be observed in the Sale of Poisons. 17. It shall be unlawful to sell any poison, either by wholesale or by retail, un- less the box, bottle, vessel, wrapper, or cover in which such poison is contained be distinctly lai)elle(l with the name of the article and the wonl poison, and with the name and address of the seller of the poison ; and it shall be unlawful to sell any poison of those which are in the first part of Schedule (A.) to this Act, or may hereafter be added thereto under Section two of this Act, to any person unknown to the seller, unless introduced by some person known to the seller ; and on every sale of any such article the seller shall, before delivery, make or cause to be made an entry in a book to be kept for that purpose, stating, in the form set forth in Schedule (F.) to this Act, the date of the sale, the name and address of the pur- chaser, the name and quantity of the article sold, and the purpose for which it is stated by the purchaser to be required, to which entry the signature of the pur- chaser and of the person, if any, who introduced him shall be affixed ; and any person selling poison otherwise than is herein provided shall, upon a summary con- viction before two justices of the peace in Eiujland or the Sheriff in Scotland, be liable to a penalty not exceeding five pounds for the first offence, and to a penalty not exceeding ten pounds for the second or any subsequent offence, and for the purposes of this section the person on whose behalf any sale is made by any apprentice or servant shall be deemed to be the seller ; but the provisions of this section, which are solely applicable to poisons in the fii-st part of the Schedule (A.) to this Act, or which require that the label shall contain the name and address of the seller, shall not apply to articles to be exported from Great Britain by whole- sale dealers, nor to sales by wholesale to retail dealers in the ordinary course of wholesale dealing, nor shall any of the provisions of this section ap|>ly to any medicine supplied by a legally qualified apothecary to his patient, nor aj)|)ly to any article when forming part of the ingredients of any medicine dispensed by a person registered under this Act ; provided such medicine be labelled in the manner afore- said, with the name and address of the seller, and the ingredients thereof be entered, with the name of the person to whom it is sold or delivered, in a book to be kept by the seller for that purpose ; and nothing in this Act contained shall repeal or affect any of the provisions of an Act of the Session holden in the fourteenth and fifteenth years in the reign of Her present Majesty, intituled An Act to regulate the Sale of A rsenic. Chemists and Druggists in Business prior to passing of Act eligible for Election as Members of Pkarmaceulical Society. 18. Every person who at the time of the passing of this Act is or has been in business on his own account as a chemist and druggist as aforesaid, and who shall be registered as a chemist and druggist, shall be eligible to be elected and continue a member of the Pharmaceutical Society according to the byelaws thereof; but no person shall, in right of membei ship acquired pursuant to this clause, be placed on the register of pharmaceutical chemists, nor, save as is herein-after expressly provided, be eligible for election to the council of the Pharmaceutical Society. Council of Pharmaceutical Society. 19. Every person who is or has been in business on his own account as a chemist and druggist as aforesaid at the time of the passing of this Act, and who shall become a member of the Pharmaceutical Society, shall be eligible for election to the council of the Pharmaceutical Society ; but the said council shall not at any time contain more than seven members who are not on the register of pharmaceu- tical chemists. Chemists and Druggists registered eligible to be elected A ssociates, and, being in Business, have the Privilege of voting in the Society, on paying the ^ame Sub- scriptions as Members. 20. Every person who shall have been registered as a chemist and druggist under this Act by reason of having obtained a certificate of qualification from the board of examiners shall be eligible to be elected an associate of the Pharmaceu- 314 APPENDIX. tical Society, and every such person so elected and continuing as sucb associate, being in business on his own account, shall have the privilege of attending all meetings of the said society and of voting thereat, and otherwise taking part in the proceedings of such meetings, in the same manner as members of the said society : Provided alwaj's, that such associates contribute to the funds of the said society the same fees or subscriptions as members contribute for the time being under the byelaws thereof Voting Papers for Election of Council. 21 . At all meetings of the Pharmaceutical Society at which votes shall be given for the election of officei-s all or any of the votes may be given either personally or by voting papers in a form to be defined in the byelaws of the said society, or in a form to the like effect, such voting papers being transmitted under cover to the secretary not less than one clear day prior to the day on which the election is to take place. Benevolent Fund way he applied to past Members and Associates, also to Pharmaceu- tical Chemists and registered Chemists and Druggists. 22. And whereas by the Charter of Incorpoiation of the said Pharmaceutical Society it is provided that the council of the said society shall have the sole control and management of the real and personal property of the said society, subject to the byelaws thereof, and shall make provision thereout, or out of such part thereof as they shall think proper, for the relief of the distressed members oi- associates of the said society, and their widows and orphans, subject to the regulations and byelaws of the said society: And whereas, for extending the benefits which have resulted from the said provision in the said Charter of Incorporation, it is desirable that additional power should be granted to the said council: Be it enacted, that from and after the passing of this Act the said council may make provision out of the real and personal property aforesaid, and out of any special fund known as the benovelent fund, not only for the relief of the distressed members or associates of the said society and their widows and orphans, subject to the said regulations and byelaws, but also for all persons who may have been and have ceased to be members or associates of the said society, or who may be or have been duly registered as "pharmaceutical chemists" or " chemists and druggists," and the widows and orphans of such persons, subject to the regulations and byelaws of the said society. Registration under ^^ Medical Act." 23. Persons registered under "The Medical Act," shall not be or continue to be registered under this Act. Adulteration of Food or Drink Act to extend to Medicines. 24. The provisions of the Act of the twenty-third and twenty-fourth of Victoria, chapter eighty-four, intituled An Act for preventing the Adulteration of Articles of Food or Drink, shall extend to all articles usually taken or sold as medicines, and every a be made of any such register book in his keeping, and shall give a copy, certified under his hand, of any entry or entries in the same, on payment of the fee of one shilling for each search, and sixpence for each certifi.cate. Notice to be given of the Requirement of Vaccination, and on Failure of Parent or Guardian to comply therewith, Penalty. TX. The registrar of births and deaths in every sub-district sh;dl, on or within seven days after the registration of the birtli of any child not alreiidy vaccinated within tlie said sub-district, give notice in writing in manner herein-after directed, and according to tiie form of Seliedule herein-after inserted, marked (C), to the father or mother of such cluld, or in the event of the death, illness, absence, or in- ability from sickness or otherwise of the father and mother, then to the person upon whom the care, nurture, or custody of such child shall have devolved, that it is the duty of such father or mother, or person having the care, nurture, or custody of such child as aforesaid, to take care that the said child shall be vaccinated in the manner directed by this Act, and shall together therewith deliver to such person a notice of the days, hours, and places within the district of such registrar at which the medical officer or practitioner as herein-before provided will attend for the purpose of vaccination ; and if after such notice the father or mother of the said child, or the person so having as aforesaid the care, nurture, or custody of the said child, sliall not cause such ciiikl to be vaccinated, or shall not on the ei^jhth day after the vaccination has been performed take or cause to be taken such child for inspection according to the jjrovisions in this Act respectively contained, then such father or mother, or person having the care, nurture, or custody of such child as aforesaid, so offending, shall forfeit a sum not exceeding twenty shillings. Fee to Registrar. X. A fee of threepence shall be paid to such registrar for each child vaccinated in respect of which he shall have peiformed the duties reqViired in this Act ; and he shall keep a book, to be provided as herein-after directed, containing a minute of his having duly given such notice as herein-before directed ; and the s.aid fee shall be payal)le in the same manner as the fee now payable to such registrar for regis- tering the birth of such child as aforesaid is paid. Registrar General to provide Boohs and Forms for carrying out the Provisions of this Act. XI. The Registrar General for England and Wales shall and he is empowered and directed, within two mouths after the passing of this Act, to frame and provide 320 APPENDIX. such books, forms, aud regulations aa he may deem requisite for carrying into full effect the provisions of this Act, and shall transmit the same to the superintendent registrars of each district in England and Wales, who shall deliver to the medical officers so appointed as aforesaid, and other duly qualified medical practitioners in the said district, such of the said books, forms, and regulations as they may require for the performance of the duties imposed upon them by this Act ; and the ex- penses to be incurred by the Registrar General under the provisions of this Act shall be defrayed in the same manner as the expenses under the Act of the sixth and seventh years of King William the Fourth, chapter eighty-five. Recovery of Penalties. XII. All penalties by this Act imposed shall be recoverable before any two jus- tices of the peace for the county, city, borough, or place where the offence may have been committed ; and the provisions of the Act of the twelfth year of Her present Majesty, chapter forty-three, shall be applicable to the recovery of such penalties. Application of Penalties. XIII. All penalties recovered under this Act shall be applied in aid of the funds applicable to the relief of the poor in the parish or place maintaining its own jioor wherein the offence may have been committed. SCHEDULES referred to by this Act. SCHEDULE (A.) I, the undersigned, hereby certify, that the child of atred of the parish of in the county of has been successfully vaccinated by me. Dated this day of 185 . (Signed) A.B. Surgeon of the union or parish (or other medical practitioner, as the case may he). SCHEDULE (B.) I, the undersigned, hereby certify, that I am of opinion that the child of of the parish of in the county Qf ao'ed is not now in a fit and proper state to be successfully vaccinated, and I do hereby postpone the vaccination until the day of Dated this day of 185 . (Signed) A.B. Surjieon of the union or parish {or other medical practitioner, as the case may be). SCHEDULE (C.) I the undersigned, hereby give you notice, and require you to have CD. vaccinated within three (or four, as the case may be, according to the second section of this Act,) months after the birth, pursuant to the provisions and directions of the Act of the 16 Victoria, cap. . As witness my hand this day of 185 . J .B. Registrar of births and deaths for tlie sub-district '^05 the case may be). APPENDIX. 321 SCHEDULE (D.) I, the undersigned, hereby certify, that I am of opinion, that the child of of the parish of in the county of is insusceptible of the vaccine disease. Dated this day of 18 . Signed, 4. B., surgeon of the union or parish of (or other medical prac- titioner, as the case may be). ANNO TRICESIMO & TRICESIMO PRIMO VICTORIA REGIN^. CAP. LXXXIV. An Act to consolidate and amend the Laws relating to Vaccination. [i2th August 1867.] WHEREAS it is experlient to consolidate and amend the statutes relating to vaccination in Ewjland : Be it therefore enacted by the Queen's most excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows: Acts and Parts of Acts herein named repealed on and after January 1, 1868. 1. From and after the day when this Act shall come into operation as herein- after provided, the statute of the third and fourth years of the reign of Her IMajesty, chapter twenty- nine, that of the fourth and fifth years of the same reign, chapter thirty-two, that of the sixteenth and seventeenth years of the same reign, chapter one hundred, the seventh section of the statute of the twenty-fiist and twenty- second years of the same reign, chapter twenty-five, the second section of the statute of the twenty-first and twenty-second years of the same reign, chapter ninety-seven, and the statute of the twenty-fourth and twenty-fifth years of the same reign, chapter fifty- nine, shall be repealed, — Exceptions. Except in regard to the divisions and districts of unions and parishes previously made, and to all contracts under the said statutes then in force, and to all Acts and proceedings duly commenced under the same, and not then completed, and except in regard to all liabilities and responsibilities incurred under the same, all which shall reiiiain in as full force as if the same statutes hatl not been repealed, unless they be in any respect inconsistent with the provisions herein contained. Guardians to divide Unions and Parishes into Vaccination Districts, or to consolidate or alter them, subject to Approval of the Poor Law Board. 2. The guardians of every union or parish where the same shall not have been divided into districts for the purpose of vaccination shall, unless such union or parish respectively shall be of so limited an area as not to require subdivision, in which case the same shall be treated as a vaccination district within the meaning hereof, forthwith divide the union or parish for which they act into districts lor the performance of vaccination ; and when the Poor Law Board shall by their order require any districts for the time being to be consolidated or otherwise altered, the guardians shall proceed to consolidate or alter the same, and they shall in every such case of division, consolidation, or alteration report their proposal to the Poor Law Board for their approval, which board shall approve or disapprove of the same as they see fit ; and the guardians of every union or parish may, with like Y 322 APPENDIX. approval, from time to time as they shall find it requisite, alter the districts here- tofore formed or hereafter to be formed for the purpose of vaccination. If the Board do not approve, another Scheme to he prepared; when approved. Guardians to contract for Performance of Vaccination. 3. If the said board disapprove of the proposal the guardians shall forthwith proceed to prepare another, and submit the same to the said board for approval, and 80 on from time to time as shall be requisite until their proposal shall be approved, and when the said board shall have approved of the same the guardians shall enter into a contract with some duly registered medical practitioner for the performance of vaccination of all persons resident within each district ; and every such medical prac- titioner shall be termed the public vaccinator of the district; and as and when the contracts now existing shall determine the guardians shall enter into others, with such modifications as the circumstances shall render necessary, subject to the like approval of the Poor Law Board as aforesaid. Qualification of Vaccinator to be prescribed by Lords of the Privy Council, and other Megulations to be prescribed by them. 4. No person shall be appointed a public vaccinator, or act as deputy for a public vaccinator who shall not possess the qualification heretofore prescribed by the Lords of Her Majesty's Council, or such as shall be from time to time hereafter prescribed by them, except when such Lords shall upon suSicient cause sanction any departure from their directions ; and ail such regulations as the said Lords have heretofore made or shall hereafter make, which they are hereby authorized to make, to secure the efficient performance of vaccination or the provision and supply of vaccine lymph by the public vaccinator, and all such directions or regulations as the said Lords acting under any Act for the prevention of diseases may issue in relation to smallpox, shall be duly observed by the several persons to whom they apply ; and the said Lords may from time to time cause such inquiries to be made relating to the observance of such regulations and to the execution of this Act as to them shall seem fit, and shall direct how any money hereafter to be provided by Parliament for or towards defraying the expenses of the national vaccine establishment, or otherwise providing for the supply of vaccine lymph, Bhall be applied. As to Allowances to Public Vaccinators. 5. On reports made to the Lords of Her Majesty's Council with regard to the number and quality of the vaccinations performed in the several vaccination districts of England, or any of them, the said Lords may from time to time, out of monies provided by Parliament, and under regulations to be approved by the Lords Commissioners of Her Majesty's Treasury, authorize to be paid to any public vaccinators, in addition to the payments received by them from guardians or overseers, further payments not exceeding in any case the rate of one shilling for each child whom the vaccinator has successfully vaccinated during the time to which the award of the said Lords of the Council relates. As to Fees payable for Vaccination. 6. Every such contract for vaccination shall provide for payment in respect only of the successful vaccination of persons, and so that the rate of payment for primary vaccinations shall be not less than the following ; that is to say, for every puch vaccination done at an appointed station situated at or within one mile from the residence of the vaccinator, or in the workhouse of the union or parish, not less than one shilling and sixpence ; and for every such vaccination done at any station over one mile and under two miles distant from his residence, not less than two shillings ; and for every sucli vaccination done at any station over two miles distant from his residence, not less than three shillings ; such distance being measured according to the nearest public carriage road ; but in respect of success- ful vaccinations performed elsewhere than at a station or in the workhouse as aforesaid, the payment shall be according to the terms specified in the contract as approved of by the Poor Law Board. APPENDIX. 323 Conditions may he imposed in the Contracts to secure due Vaccination of Persons. 7. The guardians shall, with the consent of the Poor Law Board, make stipula- tions and conditions in their contracts to secure the due vaccination of persons, the observance of the provisions of this Act with regard to the transmission of the certificate of successful vaccination, and the fulfilment of all other provisions of this Act on the part of the public vaccinator, and shall provide all stations at which the vaccination shall be appointed to be performed other than the surgery or residence of the public vaccinator. Provision for Pe-vnccination. 8. The provisions of the contracts entered into before this Act comes into operation shall not after the thirty-first day of December next a})ply to the cases of persons who having been previously successfully vaccinated shall be re-vaccinated, but if the Lords of Her Majesty's Council shall have issued or shall hereafter issue regulations in respect of the re- vaccination of persons who may apply to be re- vaccinated, which such Lords are hereby authorized to do, the guardians shall pay in respect of every case of successful re-vaccination performed in conformity with such regulations under such contracts or under new contracts entered into after the date hereof a sum amounting to two-thirds of the fee payable upon each case of successful primary vaccination. Contract not valid unless approved of by the Poor Law Board, who may determine the same at any Time. 9. No contract for vaccination entered into under the provisions of this Act shall be valid until the same shall have been approved of by the Poor Law Board, and such board may, at their discretion, upon the application of the Tjords of Her Majesty's Council or otherwise, at any time after the sivnie shall have been approved of by them, determine it either forthwith or at a future day. No Payment to he made out of the Poor Rate or any other pullic Fund unless the Poor Law Board have approved of the Contract. 10. No payment in respect of vaccination shall be made out of the common fund of any union, or out of the poor rate of any parish, or out of any other public or parochial fund, where the Poor Law Board shall not have ayiprovedofa contract for the performance thereof, or after they shall have determined any such contract ; and every payment made contrary hereto shall be disallowed by the auditor in the accounts of every board of guardians, or of the overseers, or of any officer who shall have made the same. No Puhlic Vaccinator to be paid foi' Vaccination out of his District. 11. Where a district shall have been or shall be assigned to a vaccinator, he shall not be entitled to be paid a fee in respect of the vaccination or re-vaccination of any child or other person resident out of his district, except in case of a vacancy in the oflice of vaccinator in any adjoining district, or of the default of the vaccinator therein, of which default notice shall have been given to him in writing by the guardians, or when a relieving officer of his union or parish shall in w^riting refer any child to him for vaccination. Provision for Districts in particular Places of scanty Population. 12. The guardians may with the consent of the Poor Law Board provide in districts wlieie the population is scanty or much scattered, or where some peculiar circumstances may render it expedient for them to do so, for the attendance of the public vaccinator at the appointeil places after intervals exceeding three months ; and if by reason of such intervals the vaccination of any child cannot be performed within the respective periods herein prescribed, no parent or other person who would otherwise be liable shall be liable to any penalty in respect of a neglect to procure the vaccination during any such period ; but every such parent or other Y 2 324 APPENDIX, person shall be bound to procure such vaccination to be performed at the time and place so appointed before the commencement of the next interval, unless it be otherwise performed by a medical practitioner as herein provided, or unless the child shall be certified to be then in an unfit state for or insusceptible of vaccination. Guardians to give Notice of Alteratimi in Districts. 13. When the guardians make any alteration in a' vaccination district, or other- wise in the local arrangements for vaccination, they shall give public notice of such alteration by printed papers to be affixed in the districts affected by such alteration for one month prior to the alteration taking effect. Tlie Rigistrar- General to provide Forms. 14. The Registrar-General for England and Wales shall, when he shall deem it necessary, from time to time as occasion shall require, after the passing of tliis Act, frame and pruvide appropriate books, forms, and regulations for the use and guidance of the registrars in the exercise of their duties therein prescribed, and also such forms as shall be recjuired for the use of the public vaccinators and the sig- nature of the medical practitioners under the provisions of this Act, and shall transmit the same to all registrars of births and deaths, who shall retain such as relate to themselves, and distribute among the vaccinators within their respective ilistricts such as relate to them without any fee or reward. Registrar of Births to deliver Notice of Vaccination to Parent or other Person registering Birth. 15. The registrar of births shall, on or within seven days after the registration with him of the birth of any child not already vaccinated, give a notice, according to the form in the schedule hereto annexed marked A., or to tlie like effect, to the parent, or, in the event of the death, illness, absence, or inability of the parent, to the person having the custody of such child, if known to him, requiring such child to be duly vaccinated according to the pi-ovisions of this Act, and specifying the days, hours, and plaees where the public vaccinator of the vaccination district wherein such child resides, or the vaccinator of any station duly authorized by the Lords of Her Majesty's Council, will attend for the purpose of performing the operation, to which notice forms according to those in the said schedule marked B., C, and D., and also the address of the registrar giving the notice, shall be attached in such form as the Registrar- General shall deem most convenient. Parent or other Person to procure the Vaccination of Child within Three Months. 16. The parent of every child born in England shall within three months after the birth of such child, or where, by reason of the death, illness, absence, or inability .)f the parent or other cause, any other person shall have the custody of such child, such person shall, within three months after receiving the custody of such ciiild, take it or cause it to be taken to the public vaccinator of the vaccination district in which it shall be then resident, according to the provisions of this or any other Act, to be vaccinated, or shall within such period as aforesaid cause it to be vaccinated by some medical practitioner; and the public vaccinator to whom such child shall be so brought is hereby required, with all reasonable despatch, subject to the conditions herein-after mentioned, to vaccinate such child. Provision for Inspection of Vaccination. 17. Upon the same day in the following week when the operation shall have been performed by the public vaccinator such parent or other person, as the case may be, shall again take the child or cause it to be taken to him or to his deputy that he may inspect it, and ascertain the result of the operation, and if he see fit, take from such child lymph for the performance of other vaccinations ; and in the event of the vaccination being unsuccessful such parent or other person shall, if the vaccinator so direct, cause the child to be forthwith again vaccinated and inspected as on the previous occasion. APPENDIX. 825 Provision for the Unfitness of the Child for Vaccination. 18. If any public vaccinator or medical practitioner shall be of opinion that the child is not in a fit and proper state to be succes.sfuUy vaccinated he shall forthwith deliver to the parent or other person having the custody of such child a certificate under his hand according to the form in the schedule hereto annexed marked 13., or to the like eflfect, that the child is then in a stale unfit for successful vaccination, which certificate shall remain in force for two months, and shall be renewable for successive periods of two months until a public vaccinator or medical practitioner shall deem the child to be in a fit state for successful vaccination, when the child shall, with all reasonable despatch, be vaccinated, and the certificate of successful vaccination duly given if warranted by the result. Provision for successive Certificates. 19. At or before the end of each successive period the parent or such person as aforesaid shall take or cause the child to be taken to some public vaccinator or medical practitioner, who shall then examine the child, and give the certificate according to the said form B., so long as he deems requisite under the circumstances of the case. Provision for Insusceptibility of successful Vaccination. 20. If any such public vaccinator or medical practitioner shall find that a child whom he has three times unsuccessfully vaccinated is insusceptible of successful vaccination, or that a child brought to him for vaccination has already had the smallpox, he shall deliver to the parent or other person as aforesaid a certificate under his hand according to the form in the schedule hereunto annexed marked C, or to the like effect, and the parent or such person as aforesaid shall thenceforth not be required to cause the child to be vaccinated. Certificate of successful Vaccination to be transmitted to the Ragistrar, and a Duplicate f/iven to the Parent, 21. Every public vaccinator who shall have performed the operation of vacci- nation upon any child, and have ascertained that the same has been successful, shall, within twenty-one days after the performance of the operation, transmit by post or otherwise a certificate according to form 1). in the same schedule, or to the like effect, certifying that the said child has been successfully vaccinated, to the registrar of births and deaths in the district within which the birth was regis- tered, but if such district be not known to him, or if the birth of the child shall not have been registered, to the registrar within whose district the operation shall have been performed, and upon request shall deliver a duplicate thereof to the parent or other person as aforesaid. No Fee to be charged for Certificate. 22. No fee or remuneration shall be charged by the public vaccinator to the parent or other person for any such certificate or duplicate certificate as aforesaid, nor for any vaccination done under his contract, nor shall he be entitled to pay- ment under his contract for any vaccination in respect of which he shall have been paid by the parent or other person for whom or on whom it is performed ; and if he should have received payment under his contract he shall not be entitled to recover payment for the vaccination from any other person. Parent, d:c. to transmit Certificate of successful Vaccination by Medical Practitioner to Registrar of District. 23. Where the vaccination shall be successfully performed by a medical practi- tioner not being a public vaccinator, the parent or other person as aforesaid causing the child to be vaccinated shall submit a certificate according to the said form marked D. to such medical practitioner, to be filled up and signed by him, and shall within twenty-one days after the performance of the operation transmit the olb APPENDIX. same so signed, by post or otherwise, to the registrar of the district where the birth of such child was registered, or if such child siiall not have been registered, or the district of the registration shall not be known to such parent or other person, to the registrar of the district in which the operation shall have been performed. Registrar to Jceep Books and Register of Vaccination to he open to Searches. Fees for Searches and Cojnes. Proviso. 24. Every registrar shall keep a book in which he shall enter minutes of the notices of vaccination given by him as herein required, and also register the certifi- cates transmitted to him as herein provided, and sliall at all reasonable times allow searches to be made therein, and upon demand give a copy under his hand or under that of his deputy of any entry in the same, on payment of a fee of sixpence for each search and threepence for each copy ; and every registrar shall receive a fee of one penny in respect of every child whose birth he shall have registered, and in respect of whom he shall give the notice as aforesaid, and another fee of threepence in respect of every such ciiild whose certificate he shall have registered as herein provided, and he shall receive a fee of one penny in re-f this Act, and shall not render a reason- able excuse for his neglect, shall he guilty of an offence, and be liable to be pro- ceeded against summarily, and upon conviction to pay a penalty not exceeding twenty shillings. Penalty on Vaccinator and Parent neglecting to transmit Certificate, and Persons signing false Certificates. 30. Every public vaccinator, parent or person, as the case shall require, wlio shall neglect to transmit any certificate required of him' by the provisions of this Act completely filled up and legibly written to the registrar within the time herein specified, and every public vaccinator who shall refuse to deliver the duplicate to the parent or other person, on re(iuest, and every medical practitioner who shall refuse to fill up and sign the certificate of successful vaccination when submitted to him as aforesaid, shall be liable to pay upon a summary conviction a penalty not exceeding twenty shillings ; and every person who shall wilfully sign a false certificate or duplicate under this Act shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and punishable accordingly. Justices may make an Order for the Vaccination of any Child under 14 Tears, Penalty for Disobedience. Proviso for Costs to Person improperly summoned. 31. If any registrar, or any officer appointed bj' the guardians to enforce the provisions of this Act, shall give information in writing to a justice of the peace that he has reason to believe that any child under the age of fourteen years, being within the union or parish for which the informant acts, has not been successfully vaccinated, and that he has given notice to the parent or person having the custody of such child to procure its being vaccinated, and that this notice has been disre- garded, the justice may suuimon such parent or person to appear with the child before liim at a certain time and place, and upon the appearance, if the justice shall find, after such examination as hi shall deem neci-ssary, that the child has not been vaccinated, nor has already had the smallpox, he may, if he see fit, make an order under his hand and seal directing such child to be vaccinated within a certain time ; and if at the ex[)iration of such time the child shall not have been so vaccinated, or shall not be shown to be then unfit to be vaccinated, or to be in- .susceptible of vaccination, the person upon v.hoin such order shall have been made shall be proceeded at; linst summarily, and, unless he can show some reasonable ground for his omission to carry the order into effect, shall be liable to a penalty not exceeding twenty shillings : Provided that if the justice shall be of opinion that the person is improperly brought before him, and shall refuse to make any order for the vaccination of the child, he may order the informant to pay to such person such sum of money as he shall consider to be a fair compensation for his expenses and loss of time in attend- ing before the justice. Penalty upon Persons inoculating icitli Smallpox, 32. Any person who shall after the passing of this Act produce or attempt to produce in any person by inoculation with variolous matter, or by wilful exj>osure to variolous matter, or to any matter, article, or thing impregnated with variolous matter, or wilfully by any other means whatsoever produce, the disease of small- pox in any person, shall be guilty of an offence, and shall be liable to be proceeded against summarily, and upon conviction to be imprisoned for any term not ex- ceeding otae month. 11 tt- 12 Vict. c. 43., except Sect. 11., Sect. 59 o/ 7 ie being attached to or doing duty at a hospital, or the house surgeon or resident surgeon of the hos|)ital : The term "justice" means a justice of the peace having jurisdiction in the county, borough, or place where the matter requiring the cognizance of a justice arises, or in any part of any place to which this Act applies : The term " two justices" means two or more justices assembled and acting together, and includes any police or stipendiary magistrate or other justice having by law for any purpose the powers of two justices. Act to commence from Sept. 30, 1866, and then 27 in the county of Berks. Clewer, ) Eton, D.itchet, \ in the county of Bucks. Upton, 350 APPENDIX. First Schedule — continued. Names of Places. Woolwich Limits of Places. Deptford. The Curragh Cork - - Queenstown The limits of the following parishes and places ; namely, Woolwich. Plumstead. Charlton. St. Paul, St. Nicholas, Hamlet of Hatcham. St. Alphage, Greenwich. IRELAND. The limits of the following parishes ; namely, Kilcullen. Kildare. Ballysax. Great Conwell. Morristown-beller. The limits of the borough of Cork for municipal purposes. The limits of the town of Queenstown for the purposes of town improvement. SECOND SCHEDULE. Forms. (A.) Gazette Notice of Apjpointments. London, 18 The Lords Commissioners of the Adiniralty have [or the Secretary of State for War has] appointed R.S. to be visiting surgeon [or assistant visiting surgeon] for [Portsmouth, or the Lords Commissioners of the Admiralty and the Secretary of State for War have appointed P.S. to be inspector [or assistant inspector) of cer- tified hospitals] under the Contagious Diseases Acts, 1866 to 1869. (B.) Certificate for Hospital provided by A dmiralty, dsc. The Contagious Diseases Acts, 1866 to 1869. In pursuance of the above-mentioned Acts, it is hereby certified by the Com- missioners for executing the ofiice of Lord High Admiral of the United Kino-dom [or by Her Majesty's Principal Secretary of State intrusted with the seals of the War Department], that the following building [or part of a building], namely [here describe (jenerally the building or -part of buildinr/], has been provided by the said Lords Commissioners [or Secretary of State] as a hospital for the purposes of the said Acts. Dated this day of 18 By order of the Lords Commissioners of the Admiralty. (Signed) C.P., Secretary of the Admiralty. [Or, By order of the Secretary of State for War, (Signed) E.L., Under-Secretary of State.] APPENDIX. 351 (C.) Certificate for Hospital not provided by Admiralty, d:c. The Contagious Diseases Acts, 1866 to 1869. In pursuance of the above-mentioned Acts, it is hereby certified by the Com- missioners for executing tlie office of Lord High Admiral of the United Kingdom [or by Her Majesty's Principal Secretary of State intiusted with the seals of the War Department], that the following building [or part of a building], namely [the Lock Wards of the Portsmouth, Portsea, and Gosport Hospital, or as the cage may be], is useful and efficient as a hospital for the purposes of the said Acta. Dated this day of 18 . By order of the Lords Commissioners of the Admiralty. (Signed) C.P., Secretary of the Admiralty. [Or By order of the Secretary of State for War. (Signed) KL., Under-Secretary of State.] (D.) Declaration of Withdrawcd of Certificate. The Contagious Diseases Acts, 1866 to 1869. In pursuance of the above-mentioned Acts, it is hereby declared by the Com- missioners for executing the office of Lord High Admiral of the United Kingdom [or by Her Majesty's Principal Secretary of State intrusted with the seals of the War Department], that the certificate under the said Acts, dated the day of , constituting the hospital [or as the case may be] a certified hospital under the said Acts, has been and the same is hereby withdrawn as from the day of 18 Dated this day of 18 . By order of the Lords Commissioners of the Admiralty. (Signed) C.P., [Or By order of the Secretary of State for War. (Signed) E.L., Secretary of the Admiralty. E.L., Under-Seci'etary of State.] (E.) Information. The information of CD. of , superintendent to wit. \ of police for [or as the case may be] under the Contagious Diseases Acts, 1866 to 1869, taken this day of 186 , before the undersigned, one of Her Majesty's justices of the peace in and for the said [county] of who says he has good cause to believe that A.B. is a common prostitute, and is resident within the limits of a place to which the said Acts apply, that is to say, at in the [county] of [or is a common prostitute, and being resident within fifteen miles of a place to which the said Act applies, that is to say, at in the county of ], was within fourteen days before the laying of this information, that is to say, on tlie day of , within those limits [or outside of those limits], that is to say, at in the county of for the purpose of prostitution [in the company of men resident within those limits]. Taken and sworn before me the day and year first above mentioned. (Signed) Z.J/. 352 APPENDIX. (F.) Notice for Attendance of Woman. ToA.B. of . . J r. V. Take notice, that an information, a copy whereof is subjoined hereto, has been laid before me, and that, in accordance with the provisions of the Acts therein mentioned, the truth of the statements therein contained will be inquired into before me, or some other justice, at j on the jay of , at o'clock in the noon. You are therefore to appear before me or such other justice at that place and time, and to answer to what is stated in the said information. You may appear yourself, or by any person on your behalf. If you do not appear, you may be ordered, without further notice, to be subject to a periodical medical examination by the visiting surgeon under the said Acts. If you prefer it, you may, by a .submission in writing signed by you in the pre- sence of the superintendent of police [or as the case may be], and attested by him, subject yourself to such a periodical examination. K you do so before the time above appointed for your appearance, it will not be necessary for you to appear then before a justice. Dated this day of (Signed; L.M., justice of the peace for [Subjoin copy of information.] (G.) Order subjecting Woman to Examination. ) Be it remembered, that on the day of to wit. \ in pursuance of the Contagious Diseases Acts, 1866 to 1869, I, one of Her Maiesty's justices of the peace iu and for the said [county] of do order that ^.5. of , ,„ / be subject to a neriodical medical examination by the visiting snrgeon for [Portsmouth or as the lose may be] for calendar months from this day, for the purpose of ascertaining at the time of each such examination whether she is affected with a contagious disease within the meaning of the said Acts, and that she do attend for the first examination at on the day of at o'clock in the noon. (Signed) L.M. (H.) Voluntary Submission to Examination. The Contagious Diseases Acts, 1866 to 1869. J A jj of > in pursuance of the above-mentioned Acts, by this submission, voluntarily subject myself to a neriodical medical examination by the visiting surgeon for [Portsmouth, or as the case may be] for calendar months from the date hereoh Dated this day of 18 . ^^.^^^^^ ^^ Witness, su Jrintendent of police for [or as the case may be]. (J.) Notice by Visiting Surgeon to Woman of Times, &c. of Examin atlon. TAKE*^notice, that in pursuance of the Contagious Diseases Acts, 1866 to 1869, vou are required to attend for medical examination as follows : [Here state times and places of examination.] Dated this day of ^^^^^^. ^^^ visiting surgeon for [Portsmouth]. APPENDIX. 353 (K.) Certificate of Visiting Surgeon. In pursuance of the Contagious Diseases Acts, 1866 to 1869, I hereby certify that I have this day examined A.B. of , and that she is affected with a contagious disease within the meaning of those Acts ; and the certiheJ hospital in which she is to be placed under the said Acts is the hospital. Dated this day of 18 . (Signed) E.F., visiting surgeon for [PortsmoutK]. (L.) Certificate of Visiting Surgeon where Woman cannot properly be examined. I HEREBY certify that A.B., on being examined by me this day, in pursuance of the Contagious Diseases Acts, 1866 to 1869, was in such a condition that I could not properly examine her, and I have reasonable ground to believe that she is affected with contagious disease within the meaning of those Acts, and the certified hospital in which she is to be placed under the said Acts is the hospital. Dated this day of 18 . (Signed) E.F., visiting surgeon for [^PortsmoviK]. (M.) Order of Visiting Surgeon for temporary Detention of Woman. I HEREBY certify i\\&i A.B. , on attending this day for examination, in pursuance of the (Contagious Diseases Acts, 1866 to 1869, was drunk, so that I could not properly examine her, and I have reasonable ground to believe that she is affected with contagious disease within the meaning of those Acts, and I hereby order that she be detained in the lock-up [or as the case may be], at in accordance with the said Acts. Dated this day of IS . (Signed) £.F., visiting surgeon for [Portsmouth]. (N.) Order by Inspector of Certified Hospitals for Transfer. Bt virtue of the power in this behalf vested in me by the Contagious Diseases Acts, 1866 to 1869, I hereby order tliat A.B. of , now detained under those Acts in the certified hospital of for medical treatment, be transferred thence to the certified hospital of Dated this day of 18 . (Signed) M.N., inspector of certified hospitals. (0.) Certificate for Detention beyond Three Months. The Contagious Diseases Acts, 1866 to 1869. We, the undersigned, hereby certify that the further detention for medical treatment of A.B., of , now an inmate of tbis hospital, is requisite. Dated this day of 18 , at the hospital. (Signed) M.N., inspector of certified hospitals, \or as the case may be.] G.H., chief medical officer. A A 354 APPENDIX. Discharge from Hospital. In pursuance of the Contagious Diseases Acts, 1866 to 1869, I hereby discharge A.£. of from this hospital [add according to the fact, and certify that she is now free from a contagious disease]. Dated this day of 18 , at the hospital. (Signed) G.H., chief medical officer. (Q.) Certificate on Discharge from, Imprisonment. The Contagious Diseases Acts, 1866 to 1869. "Whereas under the above-mentioned Acts, A.B. of was on the day of convicted of the offence of and has since been imprisoned for that offence in the gaol of and is now discharged from imprisonment therein : Now in pursuance of the said Acts, I hereby certify that she is now free from a contagious disease. Dated this day of R.O., surgeon of the gaol of [or E.F., visiting surgeon for Portsmouth']. (E.) Notice to Woman leaving Hospital. The Contagious Diseases Acts, 1866 to 1869. To A.B. As you are now leaving this hospital, I hereby, in pursuance of the above- mentioned Acts, give you notice that you are stilL affected with a contagious disease. Dated this day of (Signed) G.H., chief medical officer. Note. — The above-mentioned Acts provide as follows : — If on any woman leaving a certified hospital a notice [set out section of Act]. (S.) Certificate on last foregoing Notice or Copy. In pursuance of the within-mentioned Acts, I hereby certify that the within- named woman is now free from a contagious disease. Dated this day of (Signed) E.F., visiting surgeon for [Portsmouth]. (T.) Application to be relieved from Examination. To L.M., Esq., and others, Her Majesty's justices of the jteace for the [county] of [or to N^.O., Esq., visiting surgeon for Portsmouth, or as the case may be], I A.B, of , being in pursuance of the Contagious Diseases Acts, 1866 to 1869, subject to a periodical medical examination on my own submission [or under the order of L.M., Esq., as the case may be], dated the day of , do hereby apply to be relieved therefrom. Dated this day of 18 . (Signed) A.B. Witnesfl, Q. W. APPENDIX. 355 ANNO DECLMO OCTAVO & DECIMO NONO VICTORIA REGINiB. CAP. CXVI. An Act for the better Prevention of Diseases. [14th August 1855.] WHEREAS the provisions of " The Nuisances Removal and Diseases Prevention Act, 1848," amended by "The Nuisancas Removal and Diseases Prevention Amendment Act, 1849," in so far as the same relate to the prevention or mitiga- tion of epidemic, endemic, or contagious diseases, are defective, and it is expedient to substitute otlier provisions more effectual in that behalf : Be it therefore enacted by the Queen's most excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows : Short Title. I. This Act may be cited for all purposes as the "Diseases Prevention Act, 1855." Local Authority for Execution of Act. II. The local authority for executing this Act shall be the local authority acting in execution of any general Act in force for the time being for the removal of nuisances. Expenses of A ct. III. The expenses incurred in execution of this Act shall be borne out of the rates or funds administered by such local authority, under the provisions and for the purposes of any such general Act as is referred to in the preceding section. Pojoer of Entry. IV. The local authority and their ofBcers shall have power of entry for the purposes of this Act, and for executing or superintending the execution of the regulations and directions of the General Board issued under this Act. Power to Privy Council to issue Orders that Provisions herein contained for Prevention of Diseases may be pict in force. V. Whenever any part of England appears to be threatened with or is affected by any formidable epidemic, endemic, or contagious disease, the Lords and others of Her Majesty's most honourable Privy Council, or any three or more of them (the Lord President of the Council or one of Her M.ijesty's Principal Secretaries of State being one), may, by order or orders to be by them from time to time made, direct that the provisions herein contained for the prevention of diseases be put in force in England, or in such parts thereof as in such order or orders respectively may be expressed, and may from time to time, as to all or any of the parts to which any such order or orders extend, and in like manner, revoke or renew any such order ; and, subject to revocation and renewal as aforesaid, every such order shall be in force for six calendar months, or for such shorter period as in such order shall be expressed ; and every such order of Her Majesty's Privy Council, or of any members thereof, as aforesaid, shall be certified under the hand of the Clerk in Ordinary of Her Majesty's Privy Council, and shall be published in the London Gazette ; and such publication shall be conclusive evidence of such order, to all intents and purposes. Power to General Board of Health to issue Regulations to carry out such Provisions. Local Extent and Duration of Regulations of General Board. VI. From time to time after the issuing of any such order as aforesaid, and whilst the same continues in force, the General Board of Health may issue directions and regulations, as the said Board think fit — A a2 356 APPENDIX. For the speedy interment of the dead : For house-to-house visitation : For the dispensing of medicines, guarding against the spread of disease, and aifording to persons afflicted by or threatened with such epidemic, endemic, or contagious diseases such medical aid and such accommodation as may be required : And from time to time, in like manner, may revoke, renew, and alter any such directions and regulations as to the said Board appears expedient, to extend to all parts in which the provisions of this Act for the prevention of disease shall for the time being be put in force under guch orders as aforesaid, unless such directions and regulations be expressly confined to some of such parts, and then to such parts as therein are specified ; and (subject to the power of revocation and altera- tion herein contained) such directions and regulations shall continue in force so long as the said provisions of this Act shall under such order be applicable to the same parts. Publication of such Regulations. VII. Every such direction and regulation as aforesaid, when issued, shall be published in the London Gazette, and the Gazette in which such direction or regulation was published shall be conclusive evidence of the direction or regulation so pub- lished, to all intents and purposes. The Local Authority to see to the Execution of such Regulations, dec. VIII. The local authority shall superintend and see to the execution of such directions and regulations, and shall appoint and pay such medical or other officers or persons, and do and provide all such acts, matters, and things, as may be neces-ary for mitigating such disease, or for superintending or aiding in the execu- tion of such directions and regulations, or for executing the same, as the case may require. The Local A uthority may direct Prosecutions for violating the Same. IX. The local authority may from time to time direct any prosecutions or legal proceedings for or in respect of the wilful violation or neglect of any such direction and regulation. Orders of Council, Directions, and Regulations to he laid before Parliament. X. Every order of Her Majesty's Privy Council, and every direction and regu- lation of the General Board of Health, under this Act, shall be laid before both Houses of Parliament, forthwitU upon the issiung thereof if Parliament be then sitting, and if not then within fourteen days next after the commencement of the then next Session of Parliament. Order in Council may extend to Parts and Arms of the Sea. XI. Orders in Council issued in pursuance of this Act for putting in force the provisions for the prevention of disease in the said Nuisances Removal and Diseases Prevention Acts contained, in Great Britain, may extend to parts and arms of tlie sea lying within the jurisdiction of the Admiralty ; and the Board of Health for England may issue under this Act directions and regulations for cleansing, purify- ing, ventilating, and disinfecting, and providing medical aid and accommodation, and preventing disease in ships and vessels, as well upon arms and parts of the sea aforesaid as upon inland waters. Medical Officer of Unions and others entitled to Costs of attending Sick on Board Vessels, when required by Orders of General Board of Health. XII. Whenever, in compliance with any regulation of the General Board of Health, which they may be empowered to make under this Act, any medical officer appointed under and by virtue of the laws for the time being for the relief of the poor shall perform any medical service on board of any vessel, such medical officer shall be entitled to charge extra for any such service, at the general rate of APPENDIX, 357 his allowance for his services for tlie union or place fur which he is appointed, and such charges shall be payable by the captain of the vessel, on behalf of the owners, together with any reasonal)le expenses for the treatment of the sick ; and if such 8ervice.s shall be rendered ijy any medical practitioner who is not a union or parish officer, he shall be entitled to charges for any service rendered on board, with extra remuneration on account of distance, at the same rate as tho.-e which he is in the habit of receiving from private patients of the class of those attended and treated on shipboard, to be paid as aforesaid ; and in case of dispute in respect of such charges, such dispute may, where the charges do not exceed twenty jiounds, be determined summarily, at the place where the dispute arises, as in case of seamen's wages not exceeding fifty pounds, according to tiie provisions of the law in that behalf for the time being in force ; and any justice before whom complaint is made shall determine summarily as to the amount which is reasonable, according to the accustomed rate of charge within the place for attendance on patients of the like class or condition as those in respect of whom the charge is made. Authentication of Directions and Regulations of General Board of Health. XIII. The directions and regulations of the General Board of Health under this enactment shall be under the seal of the said Board, and the hand of the president or two or more members thereof ; and any copy of such regulations purporting to bear such seal and signature, whether the said signature and seal be respectively impressed and written, or printed only, shall be evidence in all proceedings in which such regulations may come in question. Penalty for obsti ucting Execution of Act. XIV. Whoever wilfully obstructs any person acting under the authority or employed in the execution ot this Act, and whosoever wilfully violates any direc- tion or regulation issued by the General Board of Health as aforesaid, shall be liable for every" such offence to a penalty not exceeding five pounds, to be appropriated in or towards the defraying the expenses of executing this Act. Certain Provisions of Nuisances Removal Jet to apply to this Act. XV. The provisions of any general Act in force for the removal of nuisances, viith regard to the service of notices, the proof of orders or resolutions of the local authority, and the recovery of penalties, shall extend and apply to this Act. ANNO DECIMO OCTAVO & DECIMO NONO VICTORIA REGIN^. CAP, CXXI. An Act to consolidate and amend the Nuisances Removal and Diseases Prevention Acts, 1848 and 1849. [14tli August 1855.] 11 cfc 12 Vict. c. 123. 12 ct 13 Vict. c. 111. WHEREAS the provisions of "The Nuisances Removal and Diseases Preven- tion Act, 18iS," amended by "The Nuisances Removal and Diseases Preven- tion Amendment Act, lb49," are defective, and it is expedient to repeal the said Acts as far as relates to Enyland, and to substitute other provisions more effectual in that behalf: Be it therefore enacted by the Queen's most excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and 'J'emporal, and Com- mons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows : 358 APPENDIX. Secited Acts repealed as far as relates to England, except as to Proceedings commenced. T. From and after the passing of this Act the said Acts are by this section repealed as far as relates to England : Provided always, that all proceedings com- menced or taken under the said Acts, and not yet completed, may be proceeded with under the said Acts ; and all contracts or works undertaken by virtue of the said Acts shall continue and be as effectual as if the said Acts had not been repealed. Interpretation of certain Terms used in this Act. II. In this Act the following words and expressions have the meanings by this section herein-after assigned to them, unless such meanings be repugnant to or inconsistent with the context; (that is to say,) the word " place" includes any city, borough, district under the Public Health Act, parish, township, or hamlet, or part of any such city, borough, district, town, parish, township, or hamlet ; the word "guardians" includes the directors, wardens, overseers, governors, or other like officers having the management of the poor for any parish or place where the matter or any part of the matter requiring the cognizance of any such officer arises ; the word "borough," and the expressions "mayor, aldermen, and burgesses," "council," and "borough fund," have respectively the same meaning as in the Acts for the Regulation of Municipal Corporations, and shall also respectively mean, include, and apply to any royal borough, royal town, or other town having a warden, high bailitf, borough reeve, or other chief officer, and burgesses or inhabitants, however designated, associated with him in the government or management thereof, or any town or place having a governing body therein in the nature of a corporation or otherwise, and to the chief officers and governing bodies of such boroughs, towns, and places, and to the funds and property under the management of or at the disposal of such chief officers and governing bodies ; the expression " Improvement Act" means an Act for regulating and managing the police of, and for draining, cleansing, paving, lighting, watching, and improving a place, and an Act for any of those purposes; the word "owner" includes any person receiving the rents of the property in respect of which that word is used from the occupier of such property on his own account, or as trustee or agent for any other person, or as receiver or sequestrator appointed by the Court of Chancery or under any order thereof, or who would receive the same if such property were let to a tenant; the word "premises" extends to all messuages, lands, or tene- ments, whether open or enclosed, whether built on or not, and whether public or private ; the word " parish" includes every township or place separately maintain- ing its poor or separately maintaining its own highways ; the expression " quarter sessions" means the court of general or quarter sessions of the peace for a county, riding, or division of a county, city, or borough ; the word "person," and words applying to any person or individual, apply to and include corporations, whether aggregate or sole ; and the expression " two justices" shall, in addition to its ordinary signification, mean one stipendiary or police magistrate acting in any police court for the district. PART I. Constitution of Local Authority, Expenses, Description of Nuisances, AND Powers of Entry. And with respect to the constitution of the local authority for the execution of this Act, the expenses of its execution, the description of nuisances that may be dealt with under it, and the powers of entry for the purposes of the Act, be it enacted thus : The Local A uthority to execute this A ct in Places as herein stated. III. The following bodies shall respectively be the local authority to execute th isAct in the districts hereunder stated in England : In any place within which the Public Health Act is or shall be in force, the local board of health : APPENDIX. -359 Id any other place wherein a council exists or shall exist, the mayor, aldermen, and burgesses by the council, except in the city of London and the liberties thereof, where the local authority shall be the commissioners of sewers for the time being ; and except in the city of Oxford and borough of Cambridge, where the local authority shall be the commissioners acting in execution of the local Improvements Acts in force respectively in the said city and borough : In any place in which there is no local board of health or council, and where there are or shall be trustees or commissioners under an Improve- ment Act, such trustees or commissioners : In any place within which there is no such local board of health nor council, body of trustees or commissioners, and where there is or shall be a board for the repair of the highways of such place, that board : In any place where there is no such local board of health, council, body of trustees, or commissioners, nor highway board, a committee for carrying this Act into execution, by the name of "The Nuisances Removal Committee," of which the surveyor or surveyors of highways for the time being of such place shall be ex officio a member or members, may be annually chosen by the vestry on the same day as the overseers or sur- veyors of highways, and the first of such committees may be chosen at a vestry to be specially held for that purpose ; and such committee may con- sist of such number of members as the vestry shall determine, not being more than twelve, exclusive of such surveyor or surveyors, and of such com- mittee three shall be a quorum : In any place wherein there is no such local board of health, council, body of trustees, or commissioners, highway board, or committee appointed as aforesaid, and wherein there is or shall be a board of inspectors for lighting and watching under the Act 3 & 4 W. 4. c. 90., that board with the sur- veyor of highways : In any place in which there is no such local board of health, council, body of trustees, or commissioners, nor highway board, nor committee appointed as aforesaid, nor board of insjiectors for lighting and watching, the guardians and overseers of the poor and the surveyors of the highways in and for such place. As to filling up Vacancies. IV. On any vacancy in such nuisances removal committee arising from death, change of residence, or other '.vise, notice shall be given by the committee to the churchwardens, who shall forthwith summon a meeting of the vestry, and fill up such vacancy by election ; and until such vacancy is filled up the remaining mem- bers of the committee may act in all respects as if their number was complete. Power to Local Authority to appoint Committees. V. The local authority may appoint any committee of their own body to receive notices, take proceedings, and in all or certain specified respects execute this Act, whereof two shall be a quorum ; and such local authority, or their committee, may, in each particular case, by order in writing under the hand of the chairman of such body or committee, emj)0wer any officer or person to make complaints and take proceedings on their behalf. As to the Execution of this Act in Extra-parochial Places. VI. In extra-parochial places not comprised within the jurisdiction of any of the local authorities aforesaid, and having a population of not less than two hundred persons, the local authority for the execution of this Act shall be a nuisance re- moval committee, elected annually by the householders within the extra-parochial place : The first election of such committee shall take place at a meeting of such house- holders summoned for that purpose by the churchwardens of the adjacent place having the largest common boundary with such extra-parochial place ; and 360 APPENDIX. Subsequent elections shall be held annually on some day in Easter week at meetings summoned by the chairman of the local authority for the year pre- cfeding: Extra-parochial places not so comprised as aforesaid, and having a population of less than two hundred persons, shall for the purpose of this Act be attached to and form part of the adjacent place having the largest common boundary with the extra- parochial place, and notice of vestry meetings for the election of a local authority under and for the purposes of this Act shall be given in such extra-parochial places, and the householders within such places may attend such vestry meetings, and vote on such elections. As to defraying Expenses of Executing this Act. VII. All charges and expenses incurred by the local authority in executing this Act, and not recovered, as by this Act provided, may be defrayed as follows : to wit, Out of general district rates, where the local authority is a local board of health ; Out of the borough fund or borough rate, where the local authority is the mayor, aldermen, and burgesses by the council, or if there be an Improve- ment Act for the borough administered by the council, then out of rates levied thereunder applicable to the purposes of such Improvement Act ; or in the city of London and the liberties thereof, any rates or funds administered by the commissioners of sewers for the said city and liberties ; Provided always, that in the city of Oxford and borough of Cambridge such expenses shall be deemed annual charges and expenses of cleansing the streets of the said city and borough respectively, and shall be so payable ; Out of the rates levied for purposes of improvement under any Improvement Act, where the local authority is a body of trustees or commissioners acting in execution of the powers of such an Act ; Out of highway rates, or any fund applicable in aid or in lieu thereof, where the local authority is a highway board, or a nuisance removal committee ; Out of the rates for lighting and watching, where the local authority is a board of inspectors appointed for lighting and watching ; And if there be no such rates or funds, or if the local authority be the guardians and surveyors of highways, then out of the rates or funds applicable to the relief of the poor of the parish or place wherein such rates or funds are collected or arise, if such parish or place be co-extensive with the district within which the charges and expenses are incurred, but if such parish or place be now or hereafter shall be partly comprised within and partly without the limits of a place where a local authority other than a highway board, nuisance removal committee, inspectors of watching and lighting, and surveyors or guardians and surveyors, exists or shall exist, all the charges and expenses incurred in the district comprising that part of the parish or place which is excluded from such limits shall be defrayed out of any high- way rate or rates, or any funds applicable in lieu thereof, collected or raised witliin the part so excluded ; and if there be more than one highway rate collected within such district, the local authority shall settle tlie proportion in which the respective parties or places liable thereto shall bear such charges and expenses ; and if any poi tion of such excluded part be exempt from such highway rate or rates, then all the charges and expenses incurred in the whole of such excluded part shall be defrayed out of any district police rate or other rate wliich may Ijy the Act 12 & 13 Vict. cap. 65. be raised and assessed upon such excluded part : And when the local authority has not control of such rates or funds, the officer or person having the custody or control thereof shall pay over the amount to the local authority on the order of two justices, directed to such officer or j)erson ; and on neglect or refusal to pay the sum specified in such order for six days after the service thereof, the same may, by warrant under the hands of the same or any two justices, be levied by distress and sale of the goods and chattels of the officer or person in default, and such levy shall include the cost of such distress and sale : In extra-parochial places having a population of not less than two hundred persons. APPENDIX. -iGl out of a rate assessed by the local authority on all such property in the place as would he assessable to highway rate if such rate were levied therein : In extra- parochial places having a population of less than two hundred persons, out of a similar rate assessed by the surveyor of hit,diways of the adjacent place having the largest common boundary with such extra-parochial j)lace : And the local authority in the first case, and the surveyor of highways in the second, aiay levy and collect the .sums so assesseil, in the same manner, and with the same remedies in case of any default in payment thereof, and with the same right of appeal against the amount of such assessment reserved to the person assessed, as are provided by the law in force for the time being with regard to rates for the repair of highways. What are deemed Nuisances under this Act. VIII. The word "nuisances" under this Act shall include- Any premises in sucli a state as to be a nuisance or injurious to health : Any pool, ditch, gutter, watercourse, privy, urinal, cesspool, drain, or ashpit 80 foul as to be a nuisance or injurious to health : Any animal so kept as to be a nuisance or injurious to health : Any accumulation or deposit which is a nuisance or injurious to health: Provided always, that no such accumulation or deposit as shall be necessary for the effectual carrying on of any business or manufacture shall be punishable as a nui- sance under this section, when it is proved to the satisfaction of the justices that the accumulation or deposit has not been kept longer than is necessary for the pur- poses of such business or manufacture, and that the best available means have been taken for protecting the public from injury to health thereby. Power to Local Authority to appoint a Sanitary Inspector, and allow him a proper Salary. IX. The local authority shall for the purposes of this Act appoint or employ, or join with other local authorities in appointing or employing, a sanitary inspector or inspectors, and may appoint a convenient place for his or tlieir office, and may allow to every such person on account of his employment a proper salary or allow- ance ; and where local authorities join in such appointment or employment they may apportion among themselves the payment of such salary or allowance : Provided always, that where the local authority has already appointed an officer who executes the duties of sucii inspector under any Improvement Act, it shall not be necessary to appoint any other inspector under this Act, but the inspector act- ing in execution of the Improvement Act shall have all the powers, authorities, and privileges granted to any inspector appointed under this Act. Notice of Nuisances to be given to Local Authority, &c. to ground Proceedings. X. Notice of nuisance may be given to the local authority by any person aggrieved thereby, or by any of the following persons : the sanitary inspector or any paid officer under the said local authority ; two or more inhabitant house- holders of the parish or place to which the notice relates ; the relieving officer of the union or parish ; any constable or any officer of the constabulary or police force of the district or place ; and in ease the premises be a common lodging-house any person appointed for the inspection of common lodging-houses ; and the local authority may take cognizance of any such nuisance after entry made as herein- after provided, or in conformity with any Improvement Act under which the inspector has been appointed. Power of Entry to Local A ufhority or their Officer. XI. The local authority shall have power of entry for the following purposes of this Act, and under the following coaditions : — 1. To ground proceedings. For this purpose, when they or any of their officers have reasonable grounds for believing that a nuisance exists on any private premises, demand may be made by them or their officer, on any person having custody of the premises, of admission to inspect the same at any hour between nine in the morning and six in the even- 362 APPENDIX. ing; and if admission be not granted, any justice having jurisdiction in the place may, on oath made before him of belief in the existence of the nuisance, and after reasonable notice of the intended application to such justice being given in writing to the party on whose premises the nuisance is believed to exist, by order under his hand, require the person having the custody of the premises to admit the local authority or their officer ; and if no person having custody of the premises can be discovered, any such justice may and shall, on oath made before him of belief in (he existence of such nuisance, and of the fact that no person having custody of the premises can be discovered, by order under his hand authorize the local authority or their officers to enter the premises between the hours aforesaid. 2. To examine premises where nuisances exist to ascertain the course of drains, and to execute or inspect works ordered by justices to be done under this Act. For these purposes, whenever, under the provisions of this Act, a nuisance has been ascertained to exist, or when an order of abatement or prohibition under this Act has been made, or when it becomes necessary to ascertain the course of a drain, the local authority may enter on the premises, by themselves or their officers, between the hours aforesaid, until the nuisance shall have been abated or the course of the drain shall have been ascertained, or the works ordered to be done shall have been completed, as the case may be. i 3. To remove or abate a nuisance in case of noncompliance with or infringe- ment of the order of justices, or to inspect or examine any carcase, meat, poultry, game, flesh, fish, fruit, vegetables, corn, bread, or flour, under the powers and for the purposes of this Act. For this purpose the local authority or their officer may from time to time enter the premises where the nuisance exists, or the carcase, meat, poultry, game, flesh, fish, fruit, vegetables, corn, bread, or flour is found, at all reasonable hours, or at all hours during which business is carried on on such premises, without notice. PART II. With eegakd to Removal op Nuisances. Proceedings hy Local Authority before Justices in the Case of Nuisances liJcely to recur, dx. If proved to Justices that Nuisance exists, ealed against as they shall think proper, and its determination in or concerning the premises shall be conclusive and binding on all persons to all intents or purposes whatsoever: Provided always, that if there be not time to give such notice and enter into such recognizance as aforesaid, then such appeal may be made to, and such notice, statement, and reC'ignizance be given and entered into for, the next sessions at which the appeal can be heard ; provided also, that on the hearing of the appeal no grounds of ap|)eal shall be gone into or entertained other than those set forth in such statement as aforesaid ; provided also, tliat in any case of appeal the court of quarter sessions may, if they think fit, state the facts specially for the determination of Her Majesty Court of Queen's Bench, in which case it shall be lawful to remove the proceedings, by writ of certiorari or otherwise, into the said Court of Queen's Bench. Forms to be used as in Schedule. XLI. The forms contained in the schedule to this Act annexed, or any forms to the lilse effect, varied as circumstances may require, may be used for instruments under this Act, and shall be sufficient for the purpose intended. As to Protection of Local Authority ; and its Officers. XLII. The local authority, and any oflScer or person acting under the authority and in execution or intended execution of this Act, shall be entitled to such protection and privilege in actions and suits, and such exemption from personal liability, as are granted to local boards of health and their officers by the law in force for the time being. Act not to impair Jurisdiction of Sewers Commissioners, or Common Law Remedies for Nuisance, nor Jurisdiction of Local Authority as to the Nuisances referred to in this Act. XLIII. Nothing in this Act shall be construed to aflfect the provisions of any local Act as to matters included in this Act, nor to impair, abridge, or take away any power, jurisdiction, or authority which may at any time be vested in any commissioners of sewers or of drainage, or to take away or interfere with any course of proceedings which might be resorted to or adopted by such commis- sioners if tbis Act had not passed, nor to impair any power of abating nuisances at common law; nor any jurisdiction in respect of nuisances that may be possessed by any authority under the Act intituled ''An Act to abate the Nuisances arising from the Smoke of Fuinaces in the Metropolis, and from Steatn Vessels above London Bridge,'" or the Common Lodging Houses Acts, the Act for the Regulation of Muni- cipal Corporations, the Public Health Act, or any Improvement Act respectively, or any Acts incorpoi-ated with such Acts, and authorities may respectively proceed for the abatement of nuisances or in respect of any other matter or thing herein- before provided or referred to either under the Acts mentioned in this section or any other Act conferring jurisdiction in respect of the nuisances referreil to in this Act, or any byelaws framed under any such Act, as they may think fit ; and the local authorities constituted under and for the purposes of the Common Lodging House Acts, 1851 and 1853, shall for the purposes of those Acts have all the powers o local authorities under this Act. Act not to affect Navigation of Rivers or Canals. XLIV. Nothing herein contained shall enable any local authority, surveyor of highways, or other person, either with or without any order of justices, to B B 370 APPENDIX. injuriously affect the navigation of any river or canal, or to divert or diminish any supply of water of right belonging to any such river or canal ; and the provisions of this Act shall not extend or be construed to extend to mines of different descrip- tions so as to interfere with or obstruct the efficient working of the same, or to the smelting of ores and minerals or to the manufacturing of the produce of such ores and minerals. Saving as to Rights of Millowners. Jcc. XLV. No power given by this Act shall be exercised in such manner as to injuriously affect the supply, quality, or fall of water contained in any reservoir or stream, or any feeders of such reservoir or stream, belonging to or supplying any waterwork established by Act of Parliament, or in cases where any company or indivi- dual are entitled for their own benefit to the use of such reservoir or stream, or to the supply of water contained in such feeders, without the consent in writing of the company or corporation in whom such waterworks may be vested, or of the parties so entitled to the use of such reservoirs, streams, and feeders, and also of the owners thereof in cases where the owners and parties so entitled are not the same person. Short Title. XLVI. In citing this Act in other Acts of Parliament, and in legal instruments and other proceedings, it shall be sufficient to use the words '' The Nuisances Re- moval Act for England, 1855," SCHEDULE OF FORMS. Form (A.) Order of Justices for Admission of Officer of Local Authority to inspect private Premises, Whereas [describe the local atithority] have by their officer [naming hhn] made application to me A.B., one of Her Majesty's justices of the peace having jurisdic- tion in and for [describe the placed and the said officer has made oath to me of his belief that a nuisance, within the meaning of the Nuisances Removal Act for Etiuland, 1855, viz. [describe nuisance^ exists on private premises at [describe sitaaiion of premises so as to identifij them'}, within my jurisdiction, and demand of admission to such premises for the inspection thereof has been duly made under the said Act, and refused : Now, therefore, I, the said A.B., do hereby require you to admit the said [name the local authority], [or the officer of the said (local authority)], for the purpose of inspecting the said premises. Dated this day of 18 . A.B. Form (B.) Notice of Nuisance. To the local authority {describing it). I [or we], the person aggrieved by the nuisance herein-after described [or the undersigned and described inhabitant householders, sanitary inspector, or other o^cer {describing him)], do hereby give you notice, that there exists in or upon the [dwelhng house, yard, etc., as the case may be], situate at [giving such description as may be sufficient to identify the premises], in the parish of in your district, under the ^^uisances Removal Act, 1855, the following nuisance, videlicet [d( scribing tlie nuisance, as the case may be; for instance, a. dwelling house or building a nuisance or injurious to health for want of a privy or drain or sufficient mean-* of ventilation, or so dilapidated or so filthy as to be a nui-ance or injurious to health, or, for further instance, a ditch or drain so foul as to be a nuisance or injurious to health, or an accumulation of APPENDIX. 37i a nuisance or injurious to health, • the county [or borough, etc.] of [or district, or as the case I one of the magistrates of the police courts of the may 6e,] to wit. j metropolis, or as the case may be, or one of Her Majesty's justices of the peace, as the case maybe, of the county of ], by A.B., owner within the meaning of the "Nuisances Removal Act for England, 1855," of certain premi.ses, to wit, a dwelling house [or building, or as the case may be], situate at [insert such a description of the premises as may be sufficient to identify them], in the parish of in the said county \or borough, tkc], that CD., the occupier of the said premises, doth prevent the said A.B.iioxa. obeying and carrying into effect the provisions of the said Act, in this, to wit, that he the said CD. [here describe the act of prevention generally according to the circumstances; for instance thus, doth refuse to quit the said house, the same having by the oi-der of justices been declared unfit for human habitation, or doth prevent the said A.B. from cleansing or whitewashing or purifying the said dwelling house, or erecting a privy or drain, or breaking an aperture for ventilation, or cleansing a drain, ditch, gutter, watercourse, privy, urinal, cesspool, or ashpit which is a nuisance or injurious to health]: And whereas the said CD. has been summoned to answer the said complaint, and has not shown sufficient cause against the same, and it appears to me that [describe the act or icorks to be done] is necessary for the purpose of enabling the said A.B. to obey and 374 APPF.NDIX. carry into effect the provisions of the said Act, 1 do hereby order tliat the Baid CD. do permit the said A.B. [describe the act or works to he done'\ in the manner required by the said Act. Given under my hand and seal this day of in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and E.F. (L.s.) Form (H.) Summons for Nonpayment of Costs, Expenses, or Penalties. Sec. 20. To [describe the person from whom the costs, expenses, and penalties are due]. County of , You are required to appear before two of Her Majesty's or borough of f justices of the peace [or one of the magistrates of the or district of ( police courts of the metropolis, or the stipendiary to wit. ' magistrates] of the county [or other jurisdiction] of at the petty sessions [or court] holden at on the day of next, at the hour of in the noon, to answer the complaint this day made to me by [or by on behalf of] [naming the local authority], that the sum of pounds, being costs and expenses incurred by you under and in relation to a certain complaint touching [describe the nuisance], and an oider of [describe the person making the order] duly made in pursuance of the Nuisances Removal Act for England, 1855 [if penalties are due, add, and also the sum of being the amount of penalties payable by you for dis- obedience of the said order], remains unpaid and due from you. Given under the iiand of me, J. P., Esquire, one of Her Majesty's justices of the peace acting in and for the [jurisdiction stated in the margin] lor one of the magistrates of the police courts of the metropolis, or stipendiary magistrate of ] the day of in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and Form (I.) Order for Payment of Costs, Expenses, and Penalties. Sec. 20. To [name the person on whom the order is made]. County. iuisances Removal Act, to act in and for one or more of the parishes or places for which the board is the local authority ; and every coumiittee so appointed shall have the full power 378 APPENDIX. of executing the said Act in all respects, within the specified place or places for which it is appointed, unless its power be expressly limited by the terms of its appointment ; and the board of guardians shall cause the charges and expenses of every such committee to be paid out of the poor rates of the place or places for which such committee is appointed ; and where a committee is so appointed for any such place or places the charges and expenses of the board as local authority for or in respect of the place or places for v?hich a committee is not appointed shall be paid or contributed by such last-mentioned place or places in like manner as the expenses of a committee : Provided that where any one such committee is appointed for all the places for which the board is the local authority its charges and expenses shall be contributed and paid in like manner as the charges and expenses of the board would have been contributed and paid if such committee had not been appointed. Saving for the Vestries and District Boards of the Metropolis. VI. Provided also, Tliat as regards the metropolis, the vestries and district boards under the Act of the Session holden in the eighteenth and nineteenth years of Her Majesty, chapter one hundred and twenty, within their respective parishes and districts, shall continue and be the local authorities for the execution of the said Nuisances Removal Act, and their charges and expenses shall be defrayed as if this Act had not been passed. Wells, &c. belonging to any Place vested in Local Authority, die. VI I. All wells, fountains, and pumps provided under section fifty of the Public Health Act, 1848, or otherwise, for the use of the inhabitants of any place and not being the property of or vested in any person or corporation other than officers of such place, shall be vested in the local authority under this Act for such place, who shall from time to time cause to be kept in good repair and condition and free from pollution all wells, fountains, and pumps vested in them under this Act, and may also keep in good repair and condition and free from pollution other wells, fountains, and pumps dedicated to or open to the use of the inhabitants of such place. Penalty for folding Water. VIII. If any person do any act whatsoever whereby any fountain or pump is wilfully or maliciously damayed, or tlie water of any well, fountain, or pump ia polluted or fouled, he shall, upon summary conviction of such offence before two justices, forfeit a sum not exceeding five pounds for such offence, and a further sum not exceeding twenty shillings for every day during which sjch offence is continued after written notice from the local authority in relation thereto ; but nothing herein contained shall extend to any offence provided against by section twenty-three of the said Nuisances Removal Act. Appointment of Inspectors of Nuisances. IX. Local authorities under this Act may, for the purposes of the Act, seve- rally appoint or employ inspectors of nuisances, and make such payments as they see fit for the remuneration and expenses of such inspectors. Diseases Prevention. Sections 2 ayid 3 of 18 d- 19 Vict. c. 116. repealed. X. Sections two and three of the Diseases Prevention Act, 18.o5, and every other enactment constituting a local authotity for the execution of the same Act, or providing for the expenses of the execution thereof, except those contained in the eighteenth and nineteenth of Victoria, chapter one hundred and twenty, the Metropolis Local Management Act, shall be repealed. Guardians and Ovei seers of the Poor to he the Local Authorities for executing Diseases Prevention Act. XI. The board of guardians for every union, or parish not within an union, in England shall be the local authority for executing the said Diseases Prevention Act APPENDIX. •j79 in every place within their respective unions and parishes, and in every parish and place in Etu/laiid not witliin a union, and for which there is no board of guardianw, the overseers of the poor shall be the local authoiity to execute tlie same Act ; and the expenses incurred in the execution of such Act hy tlje board of guardians for a union shall be defrayed out of the common fund theieof, and the expenses of the board of guardians or overseers of the pnor of any single pariah or place shall be defrayed out of the rates for the relief of the poor of such parish or place ; provided that every such board of guardians shall, for the execution of the said Act for the Prevention of Diseases, have the like powersof appointing committees, with the like authoritv, and where any such committee is appointed the expenses thereof ami of the board shall be paid in the same manner, as herein-before provided where such a board is the local authority for the execution of the said Nuisances Removal Act; provided also, that any expenses already incurred by any local authority in the execution of the said Act shall be defrayed as if this Act had not been passed ; provided, moreover, that in respect of any place where, under this Act, the local authority for executing the Nuisances Kemoval Act is any other body th;in the board of guardians or the overseers of the poor, the Privy Council, if it see fit, may, in the manner provided for the exercise of its powers under the Public Health Act, 1858, authorize such other body to be, instead of the board of guardians or the overseers of the poor, the local authority for executing the Diseases Prevention Act ; provided also, that as regards the metropolis the vestries and district boards under the Act of the Session holden in the eigliteenth and iiineteentli years of Her Majesty, chapter one hundred and twenty, within their respective parishes and districts, shall continue to be the loc il authorities for ihe execution of the said Diseases Prevention Act, 1855, and their charges and expenses shall be defrayed as if this Act had not been passed. Local Authorities may provide Carriages for Conveyance of infected Persons. XII. It shall be lawful for the local authority for executing the said Diseases Prevention Act to provide and maintain a carriage or carriages suitable for the conveyance of persons suffering under any contagious or infectious disease, and to convey such sick and diseased |)ersons as may be residing within such locality to any hospital or other place of destination, and the expense thereof shall be deemed to be an expense incurred in executing the said Act. Justices, on the Application of Householders, may order the Removal of Nuisances. XIII. Upon complaint before a justice of the peace by any inhabitant of any parish or place of the existence of any nuisance on any priv.ate premises in the same parish or place, such justice shall issue a summons requiring the person by ■whose act, default, permission, or sufferance the nuisance arises, or if such person cannot be found or ascertaineil, the owner or occupier of the premises on which the nuisance arises, to appear before two justices in petty sessions assembled at their usual place of meeting, who shall proceed to inquire into the said complaint, and act in relation thereto as in cases where complaint is made by a local authority under section twelve of the said Nuisances Removal Act, and as if the person making the complaint were such local authority : Provided always, that it shall be lawful for the said justices, if they see fit, to ailjourn the hearing or further hearing of such summons for an examination of the i)remises where the nuisance is allt-ged to exist, and to require the admission or authorize the entry into such premises of any constalde or other person or persons, and thereupon the person or persons auihorized by the order of the justices may enter and act as the local auihority might under a like order n\a;ame, and the same shall be recovered in manner authorized by the Nuisance Removal Acts, and the owner shall allow such occupier to deduct the sums of money which he so pays out of the rent from time to time becoming due in respect of the said premises, as if the c c :i 888 APPENDIX. same had been actually paid to such owner as part of such rent : Provided always, that no such occupier shall be required to pay any further sum than the amount of rent for the time being due from him, or which, after such demand of such costs or expenses from such occupier, and after notice not to pay his landlord any rent without first deducting the amount of such costs or expenses, becomes payable by such occupier, unless he refuse, on application being made to him for that purpose by or on behalf of the nuisance authority, truly to disclose the amount of bis rent and the name and address of the person to whom such rent is payable, but the burden of proof that the sum demanded from any such occupier is greater than the rent due by him at the time of such notice, or which has since accrued, shall lie upon such occupier ; provided also, that nothing herein contained shall be taken to affect any contract made or to be made between any owner or occupier of any house, building, or other property whereof it is or may be agreed that the occupier shall pay or discharge all rates, dues, and sums of money payable in respect of such house, building, or other property, or to affect any contract whatsoever between landlord or tenant. PART III. Miscellaneous. In Cities, Boroughs, or Towns, Secretary of State, on Application of Nuisance Authority, may empower them to make Regulations as to Lodging Houses. 35. On application to one of Her Majesty's Principal Secretaries of State by the nuisance authority of the city of London, or any district or parish included within the Act for the better local government of the metropolis, or of any municipal borough, or of any place under the Local Government Act, 1858, or any local Improvement Act, or of any city or town containing, according to the census for the time bein" in force, a population of not less than five thousand inhabitants, the Secretary of°State may, as he may think fit, by notice to be published in the London Gazette, declare the following enactment to be in force in the district of such nuis mce authority, and from and after the publication of such notice the nuisance authority shall be empowered to make regulations for the following matters ; that is to say, 1. For fixing the number of persons who may occupy a house or part of a house which is let in lodgings or occupied by members of more than one family : 2. For the registration of houses thus let or occupied in lodgings : 3. For the inspection of such houses, and the keeping the same in a cleanly and wholesome slate : 4. For enforcing therein the provision of privy accommodation and other appli- ances and means of cleanliness in proportion to the number of lodgings and occu[)ier8, and the cleansing and ventilation of the common passages and staircases : 5. For the cleansing and lime-whiting at stated times of such premises : The nuisance authority may provide for the enforcement of the above regulations by penalties not exceeding forty shillings for any one offence, with an additional penalty not exceeding twenty shillings for every day during which a default in obeying such regulations may continue ; but such regulations shall not be of any validity unless and until they shall have been confirmed by the Secretary of State. But this section shall not apply to common lodging houses within the provisions of the Common Lodging Houses Act, 1851, or any Act amending the same. Cases in which two Convictions have occurred within Three Months. 36. Where two convictions against the provisions of any Act relating to the overcrowding of a house, or the occupation of a cellar as a separate dwelling place, shall have ta.ken place within the period of three months, whether the persons so convicted were or were not the same, it shall be lawful for any two justices to APPENDIX. 389 direct the closing of such premises for such time as they may deem necessary, and in the case of cellars occupied as aforesaid, to empower the nuisance authority to permanently close the same, in such manner as they may deem fit, at their own cost. Povjer to provide Hospitals. 37. The sewer authority, or in the metropolis the nuisance authority, may provide for the use of the inhai)itants within its district hospitals or temporary places for the reception of the sick. Such authority may itself build such hospitals or places of reception, or make contracts for the use of any existing hospital or part of a hospital, or for the tem- porary use of any place for the reception of the sick. It may enter into any agreement with any person or body of persons having the management of any hospital for the reception of the sick inhabitants of its district, on payment by the sewer authority of such annual or other sum as may be agreed upon. The carrying into effect this section shall in the case of a sewer authority be deemed to be one of the purposes of the said Sewage Utilization Act, 1865, and all the provisions ot' the .Naid Act sliall apply according. Two or more authorities having respectively the power to provide separate hospitals may combine in providing a common hospital, and all expenses incurred by such authorities in providing such hospital shall be deemed to be expenses incurred by them respectively in carrying into effect the purposes of this Act. Penalty on any Person, with infectious Disorder, exposing himself, or on any Person in charge of such Sufferer causing such Exposure. 38. Any person suffering from any dangerous infectious disorder who wilfully exposes himself, without proper precaution against spreading the said disorder, in any street, pubHc place, or public conveyance, and any person in charge of one so suffering who so exposes the sufferer, and any owner or driver of a public con- veyance who does not immediately provide for the disinfection of his convey- ance after it has, with the knowledge of such owner or driver, conveyed any such sufferer, and any person who without |>revious disinfection gives, lemJs, sells, transmits, or exposes any bedding, clothing, rags, or other things which have been exposed to infection from such disorders, shall, on conviction of such offence before any justice, be liable to a penalty not exceeding five pounds : Provided that no proceedings under this section shall be taken against persons transmitting with proper precautions any such bedding, clothing, rags, or other things for the purpose of having the same disinfected. Penalty on Persons letting Houses in which infected Persons have been lodging. 39. If any person knowingly lets any house, room, or part of a house in ■which any person suffering from any dangerous infectious disorder has been to any other person without having such house, room, or part of a house, and all articles therein liable to retain infection, disinfected to the satisfaction of a qualified medical practitioner as testified by a certificate given by him, such person shall be liable to a penalty not exceeding twenty pounds. For the purposes of this section the keeper of an inn shall be deemed to let part of a house to any person admitted as a guest into such inn. Guardians, A:c. of the Poor to be the Local Authorities for executing Diseases Prevention Act. 40. Where in any place two or more boards of guardians or local authorities have jurisdiction, the Privy Council may, by any order made under the Diseases Prevention Act, 1855, authorize or require such boards to act together for the pur- poses of that Act, and may prescribe the mode of such joint action and of defraying the costs thereof. 890 APPENDIX. Evidence of Family in case of overcrowded Houses, 41. In any proceedings under the Common Lodging Houses Act, 1851, if the inmates of any house or part of a house allege that they are members of the same family, the burden of proving such allegation shall lie on the persons making it. Extension to the whole of England and Ireland of Sect. 67. of 11 di 12 Vi^t. c. 63. 42. The si.\ty- seventh section of the Public Health Act, 1848, relating to cellar dwellings, shall apply to every place in England and Ireland where such dwellings are not regulated by any other Act of Parliament, and in applying that section to places where it is not in force at the time of the passing of this Act the expression " tliis Act" shall be coiisttued to mean the Sanitary Act, 1866, and not the said Public Health Act, 1848. In construing the said sixty-seventh section as applied by this Act, nuisance authority shall be substituted for the local board. Local Board in certain Cases may adopt Baths and Wash-houses Acts. 43. Local boards acting in execution of the Local Government Act, 1858, may adopt the Act to encourage the establishment of public baths and wash-houses, and any Act amending the same, for districts in which those Acts are not already in force, and when they have adopted the said Acts the}- shall have all the powers, duties, and rights of commissioners under the said Acts ; and all expenses incurred by any lo-'al board in carrying into execution the Acts referred to in this section shall be defrayed out of the general district rates, and all receipts by them under the said Acts shall be carried to the district fund account. Power to Burial Boards in certain Cases to transfer their Powers to Local Board. 44. When the district of a burial board is conterminous with the district of a local board of health, the burial board may, by resolution of the vestry, and by ao^reement of the burial board and local board, transfer to the local board all their estate, property, rights, powers, duties, and liabilities, and from and after such transfer the local board shall have all such estate, property, rights, powers, duties, and liabilities as if the local board had been appointed a burial board by Order in Council under the fourth section of the Act of the Session of the twentieth and twenty-tirst years of the reign of Her present Majesty, chapter eighty-one. Penalty for wilful Damage of Worlcs. 45. If any person wilfully damages any works or property belonging to any local board, sewer authority, or nuisance authority, he shall be liable to a penalty not exceeding five pounds. Incorporation of Sanitary Authorities. 46. The following bodies, that is to say, local boards, sewer authorities, and nuisance authorities, if not already incorporated, shall respectively be bodies corporate designated by such names as they may usually bear or adopt, with power to sue and be sued in such names, and to hold lands fur the purposes of the several Acts conf.rring powem on such bodies respectively in their several characters of local boards, se^er autliorities, or nuisance authorities. Extent of A uthority to make Provisional Orders respecting Lands under Sect. 75. of 21 <£• 22 Vict. s. 98. 47. The authority conferred on one of Her Majesty's Principal Secretaries of State by section seventy-five of the Local Government Act, 1858, to empower by provisional order a local board to put in force, with reference to the land referred to in such order, the powers of the Lands Clauses Consolidation Act, 1845, with respect to the pui-chase and taking of lands otherwise than by agreement, shall extend and apply and shall be deemed to have always extended and applied to APPENDIX. 391 every case in which, by the Public Health Act, 1848, and the Local Government Act, 1858, or either of them, or any Act extending or amending thoae Acts, or either of them, a local board are authorized to purchase, provide, use, or take lands or premises for any of the purposes of the said Acts or eitlier of them, or of any such Act as aforesaid ; and sections seventy-three and eighty-four of the Public Health Act, 1848, shall be construed as if the words " by agreement " therein respectively used had been expressly repealed by section seventy-five of the Local Government Act, 1858. Appearance of Local Authorities in legal Proceedings. 48. Any local board, sewer authority, or nuisance authority may appear before any justice or justices, or in any legal |)roceediiig, by its clerk or by any officer or member authorized generally or in respect of any special proceeding by resolution of such board or authority, and such person being so authorized shall be at liljerty to institute and cany on any proceeding which the nuisance authority is authorized to institute and carry on under the Nuisance Removal Acts or this Act. Mode of Proceeding ivhere Sewer Authority has made default in providing sufficient Sewirs, rovision, to the satisfaction of such general council, for the improvement of such course of study or examina- tions, or the mode of conducting such examinations, to revoke any such order. Persons not to be registered in respect of Qualifications granted by the College or Body before Revocation. XXII. After the time mentioned in this behalf in any such order in Council no person shall be entitled to be registered umler this Act in respect of any sucli qualification as in such order mentioned granted by the college or body to whi^h such order relates, after the time therein mentioned, and the revocation of any such order shall not entiile any person to be registered in respect of any qualification granted before such revocation. Privy Council may prohibit Attempts to impose Restrictions as to any Theory of Medicine or Surgery by Bodies entitled to grant Certificates. XXITI. In case it shall appear to the general council that an attempt has been made by any body, entitled under this Act to grant qualifications, to impose upon any can give to such corporation the name of "The Royal College of Physicians of England," and to make such alterations in the constitution of the same corporation as to Her Majesty may seem expedient ; and it shall be lawful for the said corporation to accept such ciiarter under their common seal, and such acceptance shall ope- rate as a surrender of all charters heretofore granted to the said corporation, except the charter granted by King Henry the Eighth, and shall also operate as 406 APPENDIX. a surrender of such charter, and of any rights, powers, or privileges conferred hy or enjoyed under an Act of the Session hoiden in the fourteenth and fifteenth years of King Henry the Eighth, chapter five, confirming the same, as far as such charter and Act respectively may he inconsistent with such new charter : Provided neverthe ess, that within twelve months after the granting of such charter to the College of Physicians of London, any fellow, member, or licenti;ite of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, or of the Queen's College of Physicians of Ireland, who may be in practice as a physician in any part of the United Kingdom called England, and who may be desirous of becoming a member of such College of Pliysicians of England, shall be at liberty to do so, and be entitled to receive the diploma of the said college, and to be admitted to all the rights and privileges there unto appertaining, on the payment of a registration fee of two pounds to the said college. Her Majedij may grant Pov;er to College of Surgeons to institute Examinations, d:c., for Dentists. XLVIII. It shall, notwithstanding anything herein contained, be lawful for Her Majesty, by charter, to grant to the Royal College of Surgeons of England jiower to institute and hold examinations for the purpose of testing the fitness of persons to practise as dentists who may be desirous of being so examined, and to grant certificates of such fitness. New Charter may be granted to College of Physicians of Edinburgh. XLIX. It shall be lawful for Her Majesty to grant to the corporation of the Tioval College of Physicians of Edinburgh a new charter, and thereby to give to the said College of Piiysicims the name (jf "The Royal College of Phys'cians of Scot- land," and it shall be lawful for the saiil Royal College of Physicians, under their C'lnmon seal, to accept such new charter and such acceptance shall operate as a surrender of all charters heretofore granted to the said corporation. The Faculty at Glasgoiv may be amalgamated. L. If at any future period the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Faculty of Physicians and Surgeons of Glasgow ai;ree to amalgamate, so as to form one united corporation, under the name of " The Royal College of Surgeons of Scot- lavd," it shall be lawful for Her Majesty to grant, ami for such college and faculty under their respective common seals to accept, such new charier or charters as may be necessary for effecting such union, and such acceptance shall operate as a surrender of all charters heretofore granted to such college and faculty ; and in the event of such union it shall be competent for the said college and faculty to make such arrangements as to the time and place of their examinations as they may agree upon, these aiTangements being in conformity with the provisions of this Act, and subject to the approval of the general council. New Charter may be granted to the King and Queen's College of Physicians in Ireland. LI. It shall be lawful for Her Majesty to grant to the corporation of the King and Queen's College of Physicians in Ireland a new charter, and thereby to give to such corporation the name of "The Royal College of Physicians of Ireland," and to make such aherations in the constitution of the said corporation as to Her Majesty may seem expedient ; and it shall be lawful for the said corporation to accept such charter under their common seal, and such acceptance shall operate as a surrender of the charter granted by King William and Queen Mary, so far as it may be inconsistent with such new charter. Charters not to contain new Restrictions in the Practice of Medicine or Surgery. LII. Provided always, that nothing herein contained shall extend to authorize Her Majesty to create any new restriction in the practice of medicine or surgery, or to gram to any of the said corporations any powers or privileges contrary to APPENDIX- 407 the common law of the land or to the provisions of this Act, and tliat no such new charter sliall in anywise prejudice, aff.ict, or annul any of the existiii;^ st itutes or byelaws of the corporations to which the same shall he granted, furtlier than shall be necessary for givinj^ full effect to the alterations which shall be intenHed to be effected by such new charters and by this Act in the constitution of such cor- poration. Provisions of 17 tfc 18 Vict. c. 114. as to University of London to continue in force. LIII. The enactments and provisiins of the University of London Medical Graduates Act, 1854, shall be deemed and construed to have applied and shall apply to the University of L-mdon for the time bein:,', not^vithstandin^' the .surrender or determination of the therein-recited charter, and the granting or acceptance of the now existing charter of the University of London, or the future determination of the present or any future charter of the said university, and the granting of any new charter to the said university ; and that every bachelor of medicine and doctor of medicine of the University of London for the time being shall be deemed to have been itnd to be entitled and shall be entitled to the privileges conferred by the said Act, in the same manner and to the same extent as if the charter recited in the said Act remained in force, subject nevertheless to the provisions of this Act. British Pharmacopoeia to he 'published. LIV. The general council shall cause to be published under their direction a book containing a list of medicines and compounds, and the manner of preparing them, together with the true weights and measures by whieh they are to be pre- pared and mi.xed, and containing such other matter and tilings relating thereto as the general council shall think fit, to be called '• British Pharmacopoeia ;" and the general council shall cause to be altered, amended, and republished such pharmaco- poeia as often as they shall deem it necessary. Chemists, dkc. not to he affected. LV. Nothing in this Act contained shall extend or be construed to extend to prejudice or in any way to affect the lawful occupation, trade, or business of chemists and druggists and dentists, or the rights, privileges, or employment of duly licensed apothecaries in Ireland, so far as the same extend to selling, com- pounding, or dispensing medicines. SCHEDULE (A.) 1. Fellow, licentiate, or extra licentiate of the Royal College of Physicians of London. •2. Fellow or licentiate of the Koyal College of Physicians of Edinburgh. 3. Fellow or licentiate of the King's and Queen's College of Physicians of Ireland. 4. Fellow or member or licentiate in midwifery of the Royal College of Sur- geons of England. 5. Fellow or licentiate of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh. 6. Fellow or licentiate of the Faculty of Pliysiciuis and Surgeons of Glasgow. 7. Fellow or licentiate of the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland. 8. Licentiate of the Society of Apothecaries, London. 9. Licentiate of the Apothecaries' Hall, Dublin. 10. Doctor, or bachelor, or licentiate of medicine, or master in surgery of any university of the United Kingdom ; or doctor of medicine by doctorate granted prior to passing of this Act by the Archbishop of Canterl>ury. 11. Doctor of medicine of any foreign or colonial university or college, practising as a physician in the United Kingdom before the first day of October, 1858, who shall produce certificates to the satisfaction of the council of his having taken his degree of doctor of medicine after regular examination, or who shall satisfy the council under section foi ty-five of this Act, that there is sufficient reason for admitting him to be registered. 408 APPENDIX, SCHEDULE (B.) Declaration requii-ed of a person who claims to be registered as a medical practi- tioner upon the ground that he was in practice as a medical practitioner in Eng- land or Wales before the first day of August, 1815 : To the registrar of the medical council. I, residing at in the county of hereby declare that I was practising as a medical practitioner at in the county of before the first day of August, 1815. (Signed) [_Name. ] Dated this day of 185. SCHEDULE (D.) Name. Besideuce. Qualification. Title. A.B. London - - Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians of CD. Edmburgh - Fellow and Member of the Royal College of Surgeons of E.F. Dublin - - Graduate in Medicine of Uni- versity of G.H. Bristol - - Licentiate of the Society of Apothecaries. I.K. London - - Member of College of Surgeons and Licentiate of the Society of Apothecaries. ANNO VICESIMO SECUNDO VICTORIiE REGINiE. CAP. XXI. An Act to amend the Medical Act (1858). [19th April 1859.] 21 d; 22 Vict. c. 90. WHEREAS by an Act passed in the last Session of Parliament, chapter ninety, " The Medical Act," provision is made for the registration of members of the medical profession, and certain disabilities are imposed, after the first day of January one thousand eight hundred and fifty-nine, on members of that profession who are not then registered : And wliereas, by reason of the time required for the collection and exaiiiiuation of the proper evidence on the first formation of "the medical register," it is expedient to amend the said Act as herein-after mentioned : And whereas it is expedient that Schedule D. of the aforesaid Act should be amended : And whereas in sections thirty-one and forty-seven of the Medical Act (1858) the terms "fellow" and " member' of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of London and Edlnhu,r(jk are made use of, whilst in Schedule A. in the same Act "fellows," "licentiates," and "extra licentiates" of the said colleges are alone entitled to be registered : Be it enacted by the Queen's most excellent Majesty, by and APPENDIX. 409 with the aiJvice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows : 1st July 1859 to be sub.itituted in sn. 32, 34, 36, and 37, of recited Act for lutjan. 1859. I. The first day of Juli/ one thousand eight hundred and fifty-nine shall be substituted, in sections thirty-two, thirty-four, thirty six, and thirty-seven re- spectively of the said Act, for the first day o{ January one thousand eii^ht hundred and fifty nine ; and the said several sections, and all provisions of the said Act having reference thereto, shall be construed and take effect as if the wonl Jtdy had been originally inserted in each of the said sections instead of the word January. Section 33 of recited A ct repealed. II. Section thirty-three of the said Act shall be repealed, and no person shall bj' reason of the said Act be or be deemed to have been disqualified to hold such office as mentioned in the said section thirty-three, or any appointment mentioned in the said section thirty-six, unless he shall have failed to be registered on or before the first day of July one thousand eight hundred and fifty-nine. Fourth Column of Schedule D. repealed. III. The fourtli column of Schedule D. of the said Act with its heading shall be repealed and omitted. The Term '^Member" to be added in First and Second Heads of Schedule A. IV. The term "member" shall be added after the term " fellow" to the qualifi- cations described in the first and second heads of Schedule A. The Words ^^ Forty-six''' to be substituted for Forty-five in Schedule A, V. And whereas in Schedule A. of the said Act there is a reference to section '' forty-five," but the word " five" is there inserted by mistake : now it is hereby enacted, that the words " forty-six" shall be deemed to be substituted in this sche- dule in the place of the words " forty-five." Any Person not a British Subject having obtained his Degree or Diploma may act as Resident Physician, tkc. of any Hospital exclusively for Foreigners. VI. Nothing in the said Act contained shall prevent any person not a British subject who shall have obtained from any foreign university a degree or diploma of doctor in medicine, and who shall have passed the regular examinations entitling him to practise medicine in his own country, from being and acting as the resident physician or medical officer of any hospital established exclusively for the relief of loreigners in sickness : Provided always, that such person is engaged in no medical practice except as such resident physician or medical officer. ANNO VICESIMO TERTIO VlCTORIiE REGIN^. CAP. VII. An Act to amend the ^Medical Acts. [23d March 18G0.] 21 . WHEREAS by "The Medical Act, 1858," it is provided that it shall be lawful for Her Majesty to yraiit to the corporation of the Royal College of Phy- fliciatis of London, a new charter, and thereby to uive to such corporation the name of "The Royal College of Physicians of Enijbind," and to -rant to the coriioratioii of the Uoyai Colleue of Physicians of Ediahurr/h a new charter, and thereby to give to the said Coilege^of Physicians the name of "The Royal College of Physicians of Scotland," and to grant to the corporation of the King and Queen's College of Physicians in Ireland a new charter, and thereby to give to sucli corporation the name of "The Royal College of Physicians of Ireland;''' but provision is not made by the said Act for reserving to the said colleges, and the presidents and censors, fellows, members, licentiates, an>i extra licentiates thereof respectively, by their said new names, tlie powers, privileges, liberties, and immunities to which they are respectively entitled by th.'ir existing names, and doubts have arisen whether, in case of the acceptance by these colleges respectively of new charters under such altered names respectively, the said powers, privileges, liberties, and immunities would legally attach and be preserved to them, and it is expedient that such doubts should be removed : And whereas by an Act passed in the fourteenth and fifteenth years of the reign of King Jlenrii VIII., intituled " The Privileyes and Authoritiesof Pliysicians inZ,OMfion,"certain letters patent, dated the twenty-third day of 5e;j?e/»6e'/% in the tenth year of the reign of His said Majesty, whereby certain physicians in London therein named were incorporated by the name of "The J'resident and College or Commonalty of the Faculty of Physic in London," were ratified and confii-rned ; and by the said Act it was enacted, that the six persons named in the said letters patent, and two more of the said commonalty to be chosen by them, should be called elects, and that the said elects shoull yearly choose one of them to be president of tne s.iid commonalty, and that as oft as any of the places of the said elects should become void the survivors should choose and admit one or more, as need should require, of the said faculty to supply the number of eight persons, and that no person should from thenceforth be .•^uffered to practise ii^ physic through En(jlaHd until he be examined by the s.iid president and three of the said elects, and have from them letters testimonial, except he be a graduate of Oxford or Camhrid'je : And whereas the main function of the said elects, viz., that of examining and granting letters testimonial, has been virtuady super.seded by the said -Medical Act, and tney have ceased to grant letters testi- monial in accordance with the i)rovisions contained in the last-recited Act ; and it is therefore expedient that the before-recited provisions siiould be repealed : Be it enacted by the Queen's mo.st excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, .and by the authority of the same, as follows : Interpretation of Terms. I, The expression in the Medical Act and this Act " The Corporation of the Royal College of Physicians of London," or "The Royal College of Physicians of London," shall be taken to denote the corporation of "The President and Colle-e or Commonalty of the Faculty of Physic in ZoHf/on." New Charters may be granted to the Colleges. II. Any new charter which, under the provisions of the Medical Act, sliall be granted to the corporation of the Royal Codege of Physicians of London, may be 412 APPENDIX. granted to tliem either by anrl in the name of the Eoyal College of Physicians of London, or, as provided by th it Act, by and in the name of the Royal College of Physicians of England ; and any such new charter granted to the corporation of the Eoyal College of Physicians oi Edinburgh may be granted to that college either by and in its present name, or, as provided by the Medical Act, by and in the name of the Royal College of Physicians of Scotland ; and any such new charter granted to the corporation of the King and Queen's College of Physicians in Ireland may be granted to that college either by and in its present name, or, as provided by the Medical Act, by and in the name of the Royal College of Physicians of Ireland. Colleges to retain all existing Rights, notwithstanding Change of Name. III. The granting of new charters to the said corporations respectively by and in the altered names and styles respectively, as provided in the Medical Act, shall not, in respect of such alteration of name or style merely, alter or affect in any way the rights, powers, authorities, qualifications, liberties, exemptions, immuni- ties, duties, and obligations granted, conferred, orimjiosed to or upon, or continued and preserved to the said corporations respectively, and the respective presidents, censors, fellows, members, and licentiates thereof, by the respective charters and Acts of Parliament relating to the said corporations respectively, or by the Medical Act, the Act to amend the Medical Act, the Medical Acts Amendment Act, I860, and this Act respectively ; but the said corporations respectively, and the respec- tive presidents, censors, fellows, members, and licentiates thereof, shall, notwith- standing any such change of name and style, have and retain all such and the same rights, powers, authorities, qualifications, liberties, exemptions, and immuni- ties, and be subject to all such and the same duties and obligations, as if such new charters respectively had been granted to them by and in their respective names and styles as then existed. Colleges to hold Property notwithstanding Change of Name. IV. Each of the said corporations shall also, notwithstanding any such altera- tion of name or style, have, hold, and enjoy, and continue to have, hold, and enjoy, all Unds and other real and personal, heritable and moveable property belonging to such corporation, either beneficially or in trust, at the date of the granting of such new charter, and may execute and perform any use or trust for the time being vested or reposed in such corporation. Provisions in 14 & 15 Hen. 8. c. 5. as to the Elects repealed'. V. So much of the Act of the fourteen and fifteen Henry VIII. , chapter five, as relates to the elects of the said Royal College of Physicians of London, and their powers and functions, shall be and the same is hereby repealed, but this repeal shall not prejudice or affect the rights and privileges of any persons to whom the said president and elects may have granted letters testimonial; and all trusts which by any deed, gift, devise, or bequest are vested in, or to be executed or performed by the elects, or some defined number of them, shall vest in and accrue to, and be executed and performed by the censors of the said college for the time being as if the name of the censors had in such instruments respectively been used instead of that of the elects, and the office and name of elects of the said college shall henceforth wholly cease and determine. Election of the President of the Royal College of Physicians of London. VI. The office of president of " The Royal College of Physicians of London," shall be an annual office ; and Thomas Mayo, doctor of physic, the now president of the said corporation, shall remain such president until the day next after Palm Sunday in the year one thousand eight hundred and sixty-one, when he shall go out of office ; arid the fellows of the said corporation shall, at a meeting to be holden by them for that purpose, on the same day, and on the same day in every subsequent year, elect some one of the fellows of the said corporation in such manner as shall be jirovided by any byelaw or byelaws made APPENDIX. 413 in that behalf by the said corporation, and for the time being in force, to be presi- dent of the said corporation, but the retirinj^ president shall always be capaljle of being re-elected, and every presidt-nt sliall remain in office until the actual election of a new president ; or in case of the death, resignation, or other avoidance of any such president before the expiration of his year of office, tlie said fellow.s shall, at a meeting to be hohlen by them for that purpose, as soon as conveniently may be (of which due notice shall be jjiven), elect one other of the fellows of the said corporation in such manner as aforesaid to be president for the remainder of the year in which such death, resignation, or other avoidance shall happen, and until such election the duties of president shall be performed by the senior censor for the time beina:. ANNO TRICESIMO PRIMO VICTORIiE REGIN.E. CAP. XXIX. An Act to amend the Law relating to Medical Practitioners in the Colonies. [2