vuthentic bstracts of tes in Joun- of Bengal UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT LOS ANGELES AUTHENTIC ABSTRACTS O F MINUTES IN THE SUPREME COUNCIL O F (BENGAL, On the late Contracts for Draught and Carriage Bullocks, for vi&ualling the European Troops, and for victualling FORT WILLIAM j the Augmentation of General Sir EYRE COOTE'S Appointment, and Continuation of Brigadier-General S TIB- BERT'S Emoluments, though fuperfeded in the Chief Com- mand; and a remarkable TREATY, offenfive and defenfive } with the RANAH of GOHUD, a Marratta. LONDON: Printed for J. ALMON oppoute Burlington-Houfe, Piccadilly, MDCCtXXX, PREFACE. AT a time that the Britifh empire is over- whelmed with taxes and debt, that the ^ravages of war are depopulating the realm, that the colonies and fettlements abroad (which were "the finews of its wealth and fuperiority) are dif- membering from it, and that unnatural difcon- tents and feuds at home, are fapping and dif- uniting its internal refources and power; it be- :comes the duty of individuals, by the expofure >of authentic fadts, to exhibit before the Mini- ^nifters of Government, and the Public, the fatal ^errors which have led to fome of thofe unhappy embarrafsments ; and to roufe them to a fenfe of what they owe to their flations, and to them- felves, as the means of faving a remnant, upon which to raife a fuperflrudlure, fuperior even to what it has been. The abufes committed in the Supreme Coun- cil of Befcgal-^are fo voluminous, that it would a be iv PREFACE. be almoft impoflible (however interefting the fubjed:) to exhibit them to the public, fo as to fecure due attention to them, in any other fhape, than by pie'oe-meal. The wntratfs which Mr. Haftings and Mr. Barwell carried into execution, by Mr. Haf- tings's cajling vote, as Governor- General, againft the remonstrances and votes of Mr. Francis and Mr. Wheler in the latter end of 1 779 j the ad- vance, falaries, and emoluments voted to General Sir Eyre Coote, as Commander in Chief; and the continuation of a Commander in Chief's ap- pointment te Brigadier- General Stibbert after he \vas fuperfeded, have been topics of converfation in Britain ; but the partial difplay of mifreprefen- tation dtfignedly, hath impofed upon the credulity of many. As thefe compofe a part of the evils which threaten the fpeedy extinction of the E aft - India Company, and fubverfion of the Britifh commerce and pofleffions in India, they are made the fubjecl: of the following meets, at a time that Minifters are again obliged to bring the af- fairs of the Company before Parliament. A Treaty of a curious nature and complexion with the diftrefled and reduced Ranah of Gohud is annexed, as well to fhew the real principles of adion, PREFACE. v action, as the unaccountable infatuation which have guided the political faculties of men, cried up in this country, as prodigies for fuperior ta- lents. Other facts are to follow forthwith, amongft which the origin and hiftory of the pre- fent Marratta war, the late war whereby the Company's troops, as mercenaries, exterminated the Robilla nation, and the prefent actual fixa- tion and difpolition of the feveral ftates and powers in Hindoftan, combined and ek>fely leagued into a ftrict confederacy againft the En- glifh, on principles of felf-prefervation. In March 1777, there were above .1,500,000 Jlerling unappropriated in the treajuries of Bengal. In Augujl 1778, Mr. Haftings and Mr. Barwell fledged themfelves, that after making liberal allow- ances for all extra contingencies y there 'would re- main unappropriated in the fyeafury, on the 3 \jl of March following^ .2,056,000 ; yet at the pre- jixea 1 period, there was not .10,000 unappropri- ated. And by a pcjitive refolution which originated under Mr. 'Haftings s pen in the month of November 1778, the Company's invejtments were in future re- duced VI PREFACE. faced from 140 to 100 lacks of rupees. The loft eftimale of probable refources and aftual dijburfe- ments, from March 1780 to April 1781, unani- tnoufly authenticated by every Member of the Council Board^ and tranftmtted to the Court of Directors, difcovered a real deficiency of near .300,000, after accounting for, and appropriating the depojit of .359,000, in Fort William. 'The 'Treafury of Oude, which paid a fabfidy of about .950,000 a year to the Company, 'was exhaufted, and the Com- pany s troops in the provinces dependent upon the Nabob, were in arrears, fome fix^ and none lef s than three months. Native troops in India are like the Swift troops in Europe ; the Jloppage of pay is the Jlotpage of fervice -, mutiny and defer tion are the certain confequence -, and the troops regularly trained and dijciplined by the Company, will augment the armies of their enemies. What the event 99 " *5 306 carriage bullocks with the ift brigade. 306 ditto ditto with the temporary brigade. R. A. 612 carriage bullocks, at 3. 10. 2,218 : 8 550 ditto with the two brigades at the Prefidency and Burrampore. 14 ditto with the light infantry. R. A. 564 -carriage bullocks, at 3. 3. i, 797 : I2 Total monthly expence of the bullocks for the army, by the prefent contract, fuppofing the eftablifhment complete. Sonat Rupees. 14,407 : 3 Monthly expence of the bullocks for Sicca Rupees. the army, by the propofed contract. 58,629 : Monthly ( 9 ) Monthly expence of the bullocks for the army, by the prefcnt contract. Sonat Rupees 14,407. 3. or 13,786 : 3 Difference of expence betwixt the pre- Sicca Rupees. fent and propofed contract, monthly. 44,842 : 13 Total expence of the propofed con- tract per annum, according to the fixed eftablifbment, and exclnfive of all addi- tional allowances provided for in the faid contract, R. A. P. Current rupees 8,16,115 : to : n OR'- A. P. Ditto for five years 40,80,578 : 6 : 7 BOARD OF INSPECTION. gth September, 1779. Mr. FRANCIS, IN addition to the remarks contained in Mr. Wheler's minute and mine of the 31(1 of Auguft on the pro- pofed bullock contract, I beg leave to lay the annexed papers before the board, and to requeft the attention of the members to the calculations contained therein, before any farther fleps are taken in this bufmefs. Cal- culations of this nature ought to have accompanied the plan in the firft inftance, that the board might know what they were doing, and not be hurried blindly into engagements, extent, confequences, and expence, of which they could not poffibly have formed an idea. C The The annexed papers, number i and 2, fhew the full amount of all the draught and carriage bullocks necef- lary for the compleac fervice of the three entire bri- gades, fuppofing them all in the field ; by which it ap- pears, that the number of bullocks, propofed to be kept up for five years, exceeds what the whole army, on a comjjleat war eltablifliment, would require, by 2769. "Thele fuj ernumerary bullocks, therefore, if they are maintained, will have nothing to do. There are not guns or carnages for them to draw. There is literally nothing for them to carry. But before this time, who ever heard of keeping up a compleat war cft-iblifhment of bullocks, without actual fervice in any part of the provinces. What are the bullocks to do at the prcfidency ? What are they to do at the different cantonments ? In triuh I might with great reafon afk (with the exception of a ve.y moderate number) what occafion have we for an eftabhfhment of bullocks any where ? When they are wanted, they may be hired, or prefs'd, as in fa ft they have been hitherto, notwithftanding the contract ; but admitting that fome eftablifhment ought to be main- tained, it will be difficult to aflign a good reafon why it ihould exceed the complement necefiary for the troops in the fi-ld , fuppofing a third of the army to be main- tained on a war ertablifhment, the number of draught and carnage bullocks, taken together, ought not to ex- ceed 1,310. On this principle, which of itfclf would lead us into an exorbitant expcnce, the propoied contract is to maintain 5390 bullocks more than can be wanted, \vhich, tor nvc ytars, at the new contract rates, will be found to amount to the enormous fum of current rupees 32,82,510, ablolutcly given away out of the Com- pany's trcafury, or fquandered without any neccility or lervice whatsoever. No, No. III. Contains a calculation cf the difference of expence between the propofed eftablifhmenr, and that which would be neceffary for the whole army in the field, cal- culated at the new contract rates. Even on this extra- vagant principle, the expence would fall Ihort of the propoltd contract by feventeen lacks of current rupees in five years. No. IV. Shews what the expence of a compleat eftablimment for the whole army would amount to, if calculated at the prefent contract rates. The difference between this and the propofed rates and numbers, amounts in five years to no lefs than current rupees, 30,48,854, or very near three hundred and five thoufand pounds iUr- ling. If a majority of the Board, with fuch glaring facls before them, can entertain a thought of proceeding far- ther in the propofed contracl, I cannot hope that they will pay the lead regard to any obfervations I can make upon it. To acquit myfelf, neverthelefs, of the duty I owe to the Company on this important occasion, I think it right to rtate the following general obferva- tions. My prefent ill itate of health will not allow me to go fo deep into the fubjecl:, as I fhould do at another time. Although no evil is more feverely felt, yet there is not apparently any lefs attended to than the number of followers of the army : they confift of a multitude of predatory vagrants, and whatever tends to encreafe their numbers, tends to embarrafs and impede the fervice. C 2 Prcvifion? Previsions and forage are not only rendered conjiantly dearer than they need be, but frequent fcarcities of both are cccafioned by this rabble, which thereby bring inro imminent danger the lafety and existence of the troops. In this view the number of bullock drivers propoffd, appears to be highly detrimental to the good of the -lervice. It would not be credited in Europe, that iz bullocks fhould require feven keepers. But this is not the extent of the evil; fume, at lealr, cf thole feven, will carry with them their families. Thoie have their attendants with bullocks, or tattocs*, to carry their provifions ; and thofe mud have drivers, who alib muft have provifions. 1 hus the number of followers en- creafes beyond calculation ; mcafurts tending to re- duce their numbers would be ufeful indeed, and dcierving of the higheft applaufc. But what mall we fay of fchem?s which manifeftly tend to encreafe them ? What effect can they have, but to encreafe the confufion of our camps, to enhance the difficulty of procuring forage and provifions, to extend and weaken the line of march, and, in the end, to make our army little better than a convoy for the baggage. Having not had it in my power to enter into a par- ticular confideration of the new victualling contract, I take this opportunity of declaring, that I entirely con-' cur in Mr. Whelcr's remarks upon it. I 6nd it is farmed upon the fame exorbitant principles with the bullock contract, and to be executed by the fame per- ions ; that is, a variety of concealed imercfts are to be provided tor, under die name of Air, Crofts. On this j:art of the fubjcct I muit obfervc, that the two con- tra6b ought not, on any account, to be in the fame h.uids ; no one perion is cquJ L;J [he conduct' of two i'uch extenfivc concerns. In * Tattoes - ( '3 ) In the fecond place, I muft declare, that the prefent contractors, whoever they are, are the moft improper perfons that could be chofen for the like truft in future. The contrails were never fo ill executed, as by the pre- fent contractors. Thfir bullocks have never been ready, or fit for fervice, when called upon ; and the provifions ilTued to the Europeans, particularly the beef, has been fuch as muft have produced a mortality among them, if they had eaten it. The contractor has never given an ounce of mutton to the Europ ans in Fort William fince February lad; in confcquence of which, they have ufually taken cow- ries in lieu of the carrion beef, with which he would have fupplied them. On the increafe of the rates in both contracts, there is one general obfervation to be made, which, I think, mult ftrike every mail coaverfant in public bufmefs. In engaging for the fupply of any article whatfoever, the contractor proportions his rate of price to the quantity of the thing demanded. If he fupplies a little, his rate, or price, muft be proportionably higher. If he fupplies a great deal, he can afford to reduce his terms, fihce the profit upon the whole compenfates for the reduction on the race of each fptrcification. In the propofed bullock contract, this univerfal principle is manifeftly reverfed. The number of bullocks, on the pay of which the contractors profi: is to arife, *s en- created in nearly the proportion of feventeen to nine ; and the period, during which the contract is to en- dure, is enlarged from one year to five. One would expect from this encreafe of the period, and the num- ber, that the ratts would have been proportionally ci- minimed. On the contrary, however, the Com pany will find, that the rated pay of each indivi- dual ( 14 ; dual bullock, lumping the draught and carriage bul- locks together, is double what it was. Upon the whole, the terms, voluntarily contrived and given by Government, are fuch, as I prefume, no man living would have prefumed to have demanded, if the contract had been advertifed in the manner pre- fcribed by the Company's moft peremptory and re- peated orders. (Signed; P. FRANCIS. No. I. Proportion of Ordinance for one Brigade, confifting of one Regiment of Europeans, eleven battalions of Seapoys, and a detachment of the Corps of Artillery, fhewing the number of draught bullocks neceflary for dragging its train, and for that of the whole army. 4 twelve pounder brafs guns, with carriage, ten bul- locks to each 40 28 fix ditto, with ditto, eight ditto . 224 4 five and half inch howitzer, fix ditto 24 29 tumbrils ammunition loaded, ten ditto 290 1 ditto treafure, ten ditto 10 2 carts, artificers, ten ditto 20 i waggon for gin, fixteen ditto 16 Spare ( '5 ) Spare Carriage and Tumbrils. i for twelve pounders, eight bullocks 8 7 for fix ditto, fix ditto 42 i for five : and half-inch howitzer, 'fix ditto 6 7 for tumbrils, fix ditto 42 722 Allow one fpare to evefy fix bullocks 120 Complement of draught bullocks for one 1 842 brigade on fervice i j Ditto for three brigades 2526 Independant Chittagong battalion 30 Battalion of light infantry 30 Total draught bullocks necefTary for the field ordnance of the whole army, fuppofing it on adual fervice 2586 According to the eftablifliment of 1777, the com- plement of ordnance for a brigade on fervice was 26 pieces. Since that period, 2 twelve pounders, and 2 howitzers, have been added, which, with the 6 guns of the three battalions of the temporary brigade that are to be incorporated into each of the other brigades, makes the prefent proportion 36 pieces. No. 2. Calculate of carriage bullocks necefiary for carrying the mufquet ammunition and millitary ftores, attached to a brigade on iervice, fuppofing it to be of the ftrength ( 16 ) ftrength fpecified in No. I . (hewing the number ne- cefTary for the whole army, fuppofing it co be in motion. 196 Carriage bullocks will carry 329 barrels of muf- quet ball ammunition, each barrel containing 800 pounds, to 313,600 Suppofing a brigade to confilr. of 9580 men, and that 8500 of them are fit for fervice, they will carry in their pouches, at 24 pounds per man 1,70,000 Total mufquet cartridges for a brigade on fervice 4.83,600 50 Carriage bullocks will carry 160 Ib. barrels of powder, being the ufual proportion for fervice. 130 Carriage bullocks, and 20 haccaries, which are not provided by the contractor, it is believed, are fufficient for the carriage of the other (lores in the magazine (No. 5.) exclufive of the above hacca- ries, the captains of battalion and quarter-matters are allowed 18, and the furgeon major 10 hat- caries. 376 63 Spare bullocks in tne proportion of one to fix. 439 Total number of carriage bullocks neceflary to be provided by the contractor for one brigade on fervice. 878 Add for two other brigades on fervice. 1317 ( '7 ) 1317 Total carriage bullocks for three brigades. 14 Allow for the Chittagong independent battalion.' 14 Allow for the battalion of light infanty. 1345 Grand total carriage of bullocks. No. 3. Calculate of the extra expence that would be incurred by the number of bullocks and drivers, fuppofmg no excefs in the rates propofed. 4000 Draught 1 Bullocks at 8. 12. or 923. rVr includ- 1345 Carriage ling drivers wages as propofed per month, Sicca Rupees 58629. 6700 2586 Draught? Bullocks necefTary for the "| . 1345 Carriage^ train of the whole army, at { the above rate per month, (34'4 ( Sicca rupees J Monthly difference Sic. Rup. 24227 : 12 Annual difference * 2 9733 : "* Difference that would be occafioned in five years by mere excefs of bullocks, at the rates propofed, Sicca Rupees R. A. P. 14,53,665, or current rupees 16,86,251 : 6 : 5 No. ( is ) No. 4. . Comparifon between the expence of the propofed con- tract, and the neceffary number of bullocks for the whole army at the prclenc contract rates, fuppofing half the troops to be without, and the other half within the Provinces, and the whole on actual fervice. Propofed contract eftabtifhment, as before dated, per month Sicca rupees 58629 Necefiary Eftablifhment. 1 293 Draught bullocks ^ without the pro C 6465 vinces, at 5 rup. 3 673 Carriage ditto, R. A. ditto,- at 3 i-o 2439 IO Caught &%$**? 672 Carriage. $ provillccs at 3 3 2142 Sonatrupees 15491 5orSa. 14823 10 Monthly difference, Sicca rupees 43805 6 Annual difference 525664 8 Diff. in 5 yrs. Son. rups. 2628322 8 or current' rupees 30,48,854 i 7 Proof of the difference. Annual expence of the propofed _ contract, Sic. Rups. 7,03,548, or Cur. Rups. 8,16,115 10 n which for 5 yrs is curt, rups 40,80,578 6 7 Annual ( 19 ) Annual expence of the neceflary eftablifhment, according to the. prefent contract rates, Sicca Ru- pee, 1,77,883 8, or Current Rups. 2,06,344 13 9f. which for five years is Current Rups. 10,31,724 5 Diff. as above, Current Rups. 30,48,554 i 7 Board of Infpedlon, September 1779. Mr. WMer. In addition to Mr. Francis's accounts, I beg leave to prefent the accompanying calculate, No. 5. in order to demonftrate, that even upon the extravagant fuppofitioa of the neceffity of keeping up a conftant eftablifhment of 6700 bullocks, an excefs of expence will arife in 5 years from the exorbitant increafe of the conftant rates, of no lefs than Current Rupees 23,44,191 18:5. being above two hundred and thirty four thoutand pounds fterhng; and having eftablifhed this fact, which, with what Mr. Francis has faid, fufficiently expofes the complexion of this tranf- action, and cuts off every poffible plea of juftification. I have at prefent only to add, that \ join Mr. Francis in reprobating the projected contract, as a meafure big with the moft ruinous confequences to the Com- pany. (-Signed) E. W. Calculate of furplus expence that would arife from the increafe of rates, fuppofing the whole number of Draught and Carriage Bullocks fpccified in the pro- fofed contract to be neceffary, and one half of that number to be without,- and the other half within the Provinces. D 2 4000 4000 Draught 7 Bullocks, being the Sic. Rups. 2700 Carriage f propofed contract eftablifhment, as fpecified in No, 3. 58629 : 2000 Draught Bullocks out of the provinces, at the prelenf contract rate, 5 Sonat Rupees . each, Sont. Rups. 1000 2000 Ditto within the pro- vinces, at rhe pre- fent contract rate, R.. A. at 3 : 7 each 6875 4000 Total draught bul- locks propofed per month, at the pre- fent contract rates, Sonat Rupees 16,875 1350 Carriage bullocks, without the pro- vinces, at the pre- fent contract rate, at R. A. R. A. : 3 : i o each, 4893: 12 1350 Ditto within the pro- vinces, at the pre- fent contract rate, at R. A, 3 : 3 each, 4303 : 2 2700 C 21 ) 2700 Total carriage bul- locks, propofed at the prefent contrail rate, per month 9196 : I 4- To monthly expence of the propofed contract eftablim- ment of draught & carriage bullocks, at the prefent con- tract rates, Snt. R, 2 6,07 1 : 1 4, or 24,948 : i : 4 Monthly difference between the propofed and prefent contract rates - Sic. Rups. 33,680 : 14 : 7 T Yearly difference Sic. Rups. 4,04,170 : 15 : 2 -^ Total extraordinary expence that would be occafioned in 5 years, by the mere increafe of rates, fuppofing no excefs in the num- ber of bullocks propofed, Sicca Rupees, 20,20,854 : 12 : 2, or Current Rupees 23,44,191 : 8 : 5 Minutes on the Army Victualling Contract. Read the following letter from the Executor of the late Army Contractor, In/pection ( 22 ) Infpeclion Board, igth Augufl, 1779. Honoured Sir, and Sirs, I HAVE been honoured through your fecretarv with your -proffer of certain alterations in the army bullock contraft ; I voluntarily accept them , and having, with a view to the liquidation of my brother's ell ate, trans- ferred its concern in this, as well as the victualling contract:, to Mr. Charles Croftes, who was before a parrner in them, I humbly requeft the new contracts may both be made out in his name, and further hope, that as thefe two contracts have always been kept in the fame hands, that ihey will now be both granted for the fame term. Fort William, i6th I am, &c. Auguft, 1779. (Signed) RICH. JOHNSON. Agreed that the new contract for fupplying the draught and carriage cattle, and victualling the troops of this eftablimment, be drawn in the name of Mr. Charles Croftes, and that the latter contract be ex- tended for the fame term as the former. Mr. Francis. I object to it, and proteft againft it. Mf. V/heler. I have already given my opinion againft the recital of either of theie contracts for a term not exceeding one year, and mall not fign them ; ne- verthelefs, fo far as relates to the inferting of one name inftead of the other, I acquiefce, believing the party to have had a (hare in the former contract. The Secretary lays before the Board, the following letter from the Executor to the late Army Con- tractor. Sir, Sir, I HAVE received your letter of this date, and ac- cept the terms it contains. The contract allows 10 Sonat Rupees full batta, and 5 rupees for half batta, for beef per month, or 5 Anas, 4 Pice, each man per day, full batta, and 2 Anas 8 Pice, per each man per day half batta, for the period that motion is required, 1 agree to deliver it for j Ana's 6 Pice, each man per day half batta, for the period that motion is required, I agree to deliver it for 7 Ana's 6 Pice, each man per day, full batta, and 3 Ans. 9 Pice, each man per day, half batta. Fort William, the I am, &c. i8th Aug. 1779. (Signed) R. JOHNSON. The Board agree to allow the difference required for the remainder of the contrail, but in the new contract they will only allow the difference of one Ana and one Pice, per man full batta, and proportionally for half batta, as by the cuftom of the fervice, though not fpe- cified on the prefent contract, beef and mutton ought to be diftributed to the foldiers in equal quantities. Mr. Francis. I cannot agree in this refolution, becaufe I am no judge of the prices of provisions, or whether the terms propofed are reafonable or not ; the way to afcertain the cheapeft terms on which government can be ferved, is by advertifing publickly for propofals. Mr. fleeter. I can form no judgment of the pro- priety of the prefent requeft, for want of the proper calculations, which mould accompany a propofal of this fort from the contractor, and thofe from the re- gular department of government neceffary to contract with with them. I beg to be favoured with the amount what one Ana one Pice. -per man, per day, intended to be given in the new contract amounts to by the, year. I likewise wifh to have it aicertaineJ, ut the fame time,- what proportion mutton, for the fix months mentioned in the contractor's letter, bears to beet in the fix following months, and whether the quantity of each is to be delivered out equally j that is, whether during 'the fix months that mutton is delivered, the garrifon is to receive the fame number of pounds weight in mutton, as in beef the fix following months. _ _ ; T , , . . . . Governor General. I have no objection to the latter part of the queftion remaining for confideration, but tor the fhorc remainder of the prefent contract, I pro- pofe that the difference he requires be allowed. Letter from the late Army Contractor's executor, to Mr. B.iugh. Sir, I have received the honor of your letter of the loth inftant. Having' co^fidered the difference that will be ioc- cafioned, "by fupplying mutton inflcau of beef, I find it to be one Ana lix Pice, fonat, per man per day. For the delivery of beef at 'the prdijlency, 1 now receive five Anas- and four Pice. In lieu therefore of the al- teration you propofe, upon my claim for the delivery of nr.it ton, I beg leave to offer as a medium for the whole term of the new contract, that the contractor deliver at the prefidency, mutton for the fix hot months, (April to September infclufiye) and during rhe remain- ing fix months, mutton and beef every 'other day al- ternately i for which he ihall be permitted to draw, fix Anas Anas and 10 Pice, fonat per day, throughout the whole year. . This propofal only to vary under the re- gulation of full ard half Batta, which ever the trqops ac the prefidency may be entitled to receive. 1 have, &c. (Signed) R. JOHNSON, Executor to the late Contractor. Governor General The offer made by the contractor, approaches very nearly to the refolution of the board, the propofitions being fince considerably varied by my fuggeftion to the contractor, as it appears to me ne- ceffary that the allowance of beef and mutton to the foldiers in the winter months, ought to be in equal quantities. I underftand the price of mutton in Cal- cutta to be juft double the price of beef, and the rate now propofed will be found on examination, to make up the exact difference between the provifion of beef alone at the former rate, and of beef and mutton in the proportion of three-fourths of the latter, and one- fourth of the former at the common rate propofed. I therefore agree to it. (Signed) WARREN HASTINGS. Mr. Whder. Almoft every argument ufed in Mr. Francis and my minute of the jift of Auguft, on the bullock contract, applies with equal force to the prefent propofal for victualling the troops. The Court of Di- rectors in the i34th paragraph of their general letter by the Mansfield, dated the 23d of March 1770, fay, " It is our exprefs order, and we hereby pofuivelf direct, that you do not fail every year to advertife for, and receeive fuch propofals as may be offered, for fup- plying the troops with provifions ; and for furniihing draught and carnage bullocks, to be employed with E our ( 26 ) our army, and that you do in all cafes accept thofs propofals, which may appear the moft reafonable in point of charge ; and your are alib to take care in all your advertisements, a fufficient time be allowed before the expiration of the contract, which may then fubfift, or the time which you may limit for receiving pro- pofals for fuch contract." Unlefs fuch advertifements are made, and a fair competition allowed, I do not fee how the board can judge whether the contractor's propofals are reafonable or 'not. It cannot be expected, that the members of this board can be competent judges of the comparative prices, between beef and muiton in all parts of this country, within and without the provinces, where troops may ferve, or at what rates the contractor may be able to procure them, allowing for the difference, between wholdale and retail purchafers. Such a queftion is more fit to be decided by pro- feflicnai men, than by members of this council, if left to make their offers, according to the orders of the Court of Directors. Some of them would without cloubt bring the moft reafonable propofals before the board, of which the nature of the fervice was capable, end it would then belong to the board to judge which was moft advantageous. I muft however obfervc, that the contractor ftates the difference that will arife by fupplying mutton in- fcead of beef, to be one ana fix pice Ion at per man per day, and in confequence of engaging to deliver mutton tor the fix hot months, and mution and beef alternately for the remainder of the year; he, in oppofition to his own principles, requires to be paid the difference be- tween the two articles, throughout the whole year. I do C 27 ) I do not believe the price of mutton will exceed that of beef, fuppofing the quality to be equal, and each confumed in its proper feafon, but granting that the former fhould exceed the latter, even to the extent Hated by the contractor ; under what pretence does he claim the addition of one ana and fix pice per man per day, for the whole year, where he contracts only to change or vary the diet for three quarters of a year. In other refpects, I muft confider myfelf as left en- tirely without the neceflary information on this fubject, and can therefore only lay before the Council, for the information of the Court of Directors, an eftimate, fhewing the difference and excefs of expence, between the la r .e contract and the prefent propofal, for victual- ling the European foldiers Rationed at tbe Prefidency, together with the further excefs, provided the contract be extended to the fupply of the whole European efta- blifhment, both within and without the provinces, which will be confiderably increafed when the eftablifli- ment is compleated, according to the propofals of the Commander in Chief. I have already objected to the term, and I now ob- ject to the conditions of this contract. Comparative view of the expence of victualling the European foldiers, ftationed at the Prefidency, be- twixt the prefent and the propofed contract. Prefent Contract. St. R. A. P. Each man for 12 months, at 5 rupees 60 o o Propofed Contract. Each man for 365 days at 3 annas 5 pices per day 77 15 i E 2 Difference C 28 ) Difference being an yearly excefs on the prefent contract for each man, ftationed at the Prefidency 77 '5 I T The medium number of Europeans returned at the Prefidency for the laft three months, including thofe attached to the third brigade, to the company of Artillery brigade at the Prefidency, and at Budge- Budge ; the Invalid body-guard, and the European women and children, is 1645, which, at 17 rupees 15 anas i pice, makes the yearly excefs, on the pre- fent contra<5l for victualling the Europeans attached to the Prefidency, Sonat rupees 29515 12 i 753 Europeans returned upon the me- dium of three months, with the fe- cond brigade at Burrampore, (but no women or children are included as they are not returned) on half batta. 8 1 Europeans at Chunar and Baxar on ditto. 834 Men at 17 rupees 15 anas i pice, the yearly excefs for victualling one man, Sonat rupees J 49^4 3 6 197 Men returned on an average of three months, with the temporary brigade on full batta. 871 Men returned on an average of three months, with the firft brigade on full batta 1068 Men lo68 Men at 35 rupees 14 anas 2 pices, the yearly exception on the prefent contract for victualling one man, when on full batta 38325 10 Total excefs on the prefent contrail for victualling the Europeans of the army, if the propofed contract be extended to the whole European eftablifhment, Sonat ru- pees, per annum 82805 9 7 Mr. Barwell and Sir Eyre Coote fubfcribc to the opi- nion of the Governor General. Refolved, That the propofals of the executor of the late army contractor, viz, to lupply mutton inftead of beef, for the provifion of the troops ferving at the Preficlency, from April to September inclufive ; and during the remaining fix months, mutton and beef every other day, alternately, for which he fhall be al- lowed fix anas ten pice fonat per man per day, through- out the whole year, only to vary under the regulation of full and half batta, which ever the troops at the Prefidency may be entitled to receive be agreed to. Minutes on the contract for victualling Fort William. Extract proceedings Military Department th Auguft, 1779. Extract minute by the Commander in Chief on the general eftablimment and regulations of the army, under the Prefidency of Fort William, dated 7th 1779. Sir E$re Coote. I approve of the department of provisions and regu- lations refpeding its being kept up. Governor General. Having received frequent remonftrances from the agent for this depofit concerning the heavy lofTes and inconveniences, to which he is fubjecled by the preient indefinite term of his agency, which obliges him to purchafe the different articles of the (lores at the current prices of the markets, and in fuch quantities as are fpe- cified in the prefcribed lifts, which, in times of fc.arcity, can neither be procured of equal qualities, as in feafons of plenty, nor without an increafe in the price, Ibme- cimes even greatly exceeding the rates prefcribed in the table formed by the board. The Governor General re- commends that the agency be converted into a contraff, and be fixed for the term of five years. The Governor Gene- ral defircs his motion to be inferted in this place, but to prevent any delay in paffing the reiblutions required, by the fu ejects exprefsly fubmitted to the board by the Commander in Chief, he defircs that the opinion of the Board may be received upon it in circulation. ijth Auguft. Sir Eyre Cpote, I entirely concur in the motion of the Governor- General, as I am char that a contractor can ac~i cheaper, and of courfe. perform the. fervice letter, by having his con- tract for a ferics of years than for one. only, when his profit, mujl be immenje even to bear him harmlejs and much more to Jecure him a profit, and this is better known than I do, by members of l/iis board, to be the general practice of Europe. However, had I not thefe fundamental principles to induce me, to /apport 'the. Governor General's motion, 1 fJiould flill mofi heartily join in it from the long knowledge I have of the ( 3* > iht merits of Mr. Belli, ivhofe abilities, honour, and integrity I know td be, equal to any charge that Government can confer upon him, and which I am confident he will execute with as much advantage to his employers, as credit to himfelf, and thofe who place him in it. (Signed) E. COOTE. Mr. Wheler, . As I have upon a very recent occafion affigned my reafons for preferring annual contracts to engagements of a longer period, and as I have likewife endeavoured to prove that no other can be entered into without fub- ]e6ting on the one hand, the contractor to an unreafon- able degree of rifque, or the Company, on the other, to an improvident bargain, it remains only for me to add, that in my opinion, if pains were taken to felecl; from among the variety of contracts that already have, or probably very loon will, become the fubject of pub- lic difcuflion, it might prove difficult to take from the mafs, one where the fitneis of an annual contract in pre- ference to a longer period was more linking, and where the arguments in favour of a contrary opinion, can with lefs effecT; or reafon be applied. The advantage and utility of annual contracts, are fo well known in England, that I do not recolle6l a fingle inftance among the Company's engagements, whether for military or naval (lores, for proviiions, or for any article either for export or home confumption, where the contracts or engagements have not expired within the year ; and although I feem called upon by the Com- mander in Chief to evince the contrary practice, I muft here declare, that thofe which I had the honour to be engaged in with government, were for no longer a period. I may likewife further add. that the public received no Snail ad vantage from the Qiort duration of thofe con- trads, ( 32 ) tracts, yet fufficient encouragement was given to the contractors. If then the fundamental principles of contracts are as I have ftated them in favour of annual ones, or if the precaution is necefiary, and generally adopted, in a country where the value of each article can be afcer- tained with fo much facility and eafe, and where either a rife or fall of the markets rarely exceeds five per cent, how* much more expedient mufl a fimilar regulation prove in Bengal, where there is frequently a fluctuation of thirty per cent. To prove the utility of entering into engagements for fo long a period as five years, it is neceifary, in my opinion, to ftate very different arguments from thofe made ufe of in the Governor General's minute, viz. It ought ro be clearly afcertained that the articles to be con- : meted for, are lubject to little or no .fluctuation,, and that they will certainly be procured at or about the fame price, which regulates the markets at the commencement of the contract : without fome fuch rule the contract- ing parties will become equally expoCed to the ill con- Icquences of long engagements, which fhorter ones are better calculated to relieve, if not entirely exempt them from. 'n addition to the above arguments it may be ne- ceilary to obferve that a depofic of provifions in Fort William can only bz required in the cafe of a war, or the apprehenfion of a war, and that many circum- frances may happen which might render it quite un- neccffary and Itave the contract if extended to the time propoled, an ufeiels burden and expence on the Company. For ( 33 ) For thefe reafons I am againft entering into any con- tract for a term exceeding one year. (Signed) E. WHELER. Mr. Francis. EVERY objection urged againft difpofing of the bullock contract for five years in the manner pro- poled, in my opinion lies with greater force againft the propofition. Both of them (land in direct contra- diction to the 36th article of the Company's inftructions to the board, in which it is ordered, " that all con- tracts with the conditions, be publicly advertifed, and fealed propofals received for the fame." The btifinefs of fupplying the fort with (tores, has hitherto been performed by agency, and this mode was exprefsly choferi by the Governor General himfelf, becaule ct an advertifement for a contraff for fuch jl ores would be improper. It would be to tell the world what provifion was made for the defence of the garrifsn" The Governor General now reprefents, that " he has receivedfrequent remonflranees from the agent of this depart" merit, concerning the heavy lojjes and inconvsniencies to which he is Jubjetted, by the prefent indefinite term of his agency ," and on this ground recommends, " that it be converted into a contract, and be fixed for the term of five yean." . It is natural enough that the agent, after enjoying the mod profitable employment, that I believe ever exifted under this government, fmce January 1777, without any public complaint of thofe heavy lofTes, and incon- veniencies, againft which he now remonftrates, mould wiQi to have it fecured to him for five years longer. It is alfo very natural, that at the approaching expiration F off ( 34 ) of the government, he fhould feel fome apprehenfion for the fate of his agency under anew one, and that he Ihould ufe hip intereft with a majo:ity of the board , if poffible to put it out of their fucccffors po-.ver to reduce his immoJc-rate profits, or to^make any new arrangement for the public fervice, in this important department. But when he affirms th-.U he has fuffered heavy lofles and inconveniencies, by the indefinite term of his agency, fo extraordinary a propolition ought to have been ac- companied \vith fornething like a proof. Nothing iefs than its being brought before us by the principal member of the board, could induce me to give it a feiious confi- deration. In opposition to it, I fhall (late fome facls, which I believe will let the matter in a clear light. ill. The amount of the provifions fupplied by the ngent fmce the commencement of his agency, is current rupees 370,252 prime coft, as per account annexed. This fum is advanced to him by government, as faft as his iupplies are purchafed, consequently he has not beenfubject to any diftrefs or difficulty toraife money. He lofcs nothing on the, head of intereft, and if he is not very curdefs. or unfkilful in his management, he ought to have been a confiderable gainer on the original purchafe of the feveral articles, independent of the pro- lifs hejTi make, by the occafional converfion of th^ ;ble opportunities. He has the fp.vour and piotcciion oi "government, to fupport hirn i pure}; . - in this country, is no firiall advan- tage. He Lav:, great quantities at a time, at whatleafon he pie. is paid at the average rate fixed; by the bazar price oi imall quantities, that is, he buys in groii, ;aid in effect fells in retail, and laftly, he trades with a flock nnrcnr.ic.l for him, with the public money. 2d. ( 35 ) ?d. To fecure the agent, however, again ft all poiTible loflfes, to enable him to keep a conltant ftuck, and to reward him lor his trouble, it was originally ag eed to take the opinion of th r ee of the molt repu'.able merchants in Cak..tta, what might be a reafonable commiffion on the value if the iupplies, to anfwer all the above purpoles ; and MefT. Robinfon, Killican, and Croftes, who were confulted on the occafion, reported, that twenty per cent, per annum, would be a reafonable commiffion. It was refoived neverthelefs by the Go- vernor-general and Mr. Bar well, againft General Cla- vering's opinion and mine, that thirty per cent, per an- num, fhouldbe allowed. 3d. The commiffion already drawn by the agent, on a fupply of current rupees, 370,252 amounts to current rupees 229.912, that is fmce the loth of March 1777. His annual commj/Iion on .the above fum, amounts to cut rent rupees 1 1 1,075, >'* ^ e complains that he fuffers heavy loffes and inconveniencies, by the indefinite term of his agency. Nothing more I imagine need be faid, to demon- firate the unreaibnablenefs and inexpediency of any mea- fure tending to continue the agency on its prefent foot- ing. But independent of all other objections, 1 object to the propofed contratt 3 as to an aft exceeding the limits of our lawful authority. If it be in the power of a majority of this board, at the moment of their own duTolution, to bind their fuc- ceffors by engagements for any term they think proper, and to difable them from covredting any exiiting abufe, k will be in vain for the Company or Parliament to change the administration of the Company's affairs in the country, and to veft it in other hands. That queftion however, if I continue in the government, fhajl be tried F 2 in C in behalf of the Company; and if it be in my power, the exorbitant profits of this agency, in whatever (hape it may be continued, (hall be reduced. In th- mean time, I proteft againft the proportion, and will not iign the contract. (Signedj P. FRANCIS. Mr. Earwdl, I have read with attention, the difient and proteft of Mr. Francis to the meafure for continuing the fupply of victualling ftores with Mr. Belli, the prefent agent, who furnifhes ihefe flores. The principles on which this difient is grounded, might require examination, if the warmth with which it is made, and the intimation given in the concluding words of it, would allow any one who reads it, to doubt the influ- ence under which it is written. That fpecies of difpofuion, which is eftablifhed and maintained by the operation of an unremitted dependence on the will of rulers, is, of all oihers, moft pernicious to a community, becaufe every member of a community io circumilanced, muft, when it fyftematically prevails, either preferve his ftation by fervile compliances, or rifle it by venturing to ad on principles of freedom. In Ihort, un- remitted dependence for pecuniary benefits, is a conftarit bribe given to an individual, by the rules of every ftate, who annex it as a condition to the benefit they confer. I cannot therefore acquiefce in the reafoning I have heard advanced by the members in'oppofition, nor fubfcribe to their opinion, which would make the prefent agent, who furmfhes and keeps uptbe depofit of provifioiis for Fort William, hold hu> office during pleafute. The objections which are made to the commiffion of fifteen ( 37 ) fifteen per cent, for furniChing the (lores, and to the fifteen per cent, allowed to indemnify the agent for re- placing the decayed and damaged ftores, and for renew- ing the whole depofit every year, are indeed ingenioufly flated, and the inventive powers appear racked to the utmoft to make this commiffion, and this allowance, amounting in the whole to thirty per cent, ftrike the fu- perficial reader as an exorbitant premium ; but I will ad- venture to affirm on my own knowledge, of the perifhable nature of the ftores iupplied and kept up, that it is not poffible for the agent to derive much or any benefit, if he does not fuffer a lofs, which I really think he rnutl from this part of his engagement. Where is the garrifon in which a depofit of provifions is kept at the public charge, that does not condemn more than fifteen per cent, of fuch iiores in the courfe of one year ; over and above the heavy lofs arifing to the public, by the yearly renovation of the depofit ? I believe the depot of the garrifon of Gibraltar is not, nor can be maintained by the Englifti government at fo fmall an expence, while the fupplies are contracted for, and the lofs on condemned ftores borne by the nation, as well as of thofe which, though not condemned, are fold off at the end of every year as being of a perishable^ nature, and though fit for immediate ufe, are not in a ftate of prefervation, or capable of it,, for the courfe of another feafon. And if this is the cafe, and it certainly is the cafe, fifteen per cent, for ti;e reno- vation of the depofit of provifions for Fort William, and the lofs arifing from condemned ftores, is a very mode- rate premium, .much more moderate, I affirm, than the expence would be to our government, was a contract entered into for an annual fupply, and the old ftores in prefervation and thofe condemned, fold at the end of every year for Govern'nent. Why it fhould be advanced as an argument againft the mode propofed for keeping up a depofit in high and perfecl: prelervation, that the sgcnt poiTibly may do it without lofs to himfelf, I cannot co-nprehcnd C 38 ) comprehend, unlefs it means to affirm, by implication, that Government can keep up fuch a depolit with equal facility, and without lofs, or little lofs. If this is the pofttion laboured to be eftablifhed, I deny it, and the experience of every man muft contradict it. In what office of our Government, or in any Govern- ment, are ftores of a periihable nature kept up without lofs, and a heavy lofs to Government. I am fure in no office that has ever fallen under my obfervation, and I call upon the other members for information if any office has, under theirs. In all the offices of fupply under our Government, ad- vances are made on the application of our officers, and a commifiion of fifteen per cent, allowed on the rates fixed by Government on the articles to be fupplied. On many articles this commiflion is reduced to nothing ; as their real price far exceeds the rates while on others it is en- hanced by being below the rates. I dare affirm the agent for keeping up the depofit of provifion for Fort William, would efteem himfelf very happy to draw his commiflion dear for the fupplies, and difengage himfelf from the further allowance of fifteen per cent, with the condition annexed to it, of renewing and keeping up the depofit. But as I am convinced it is not for the intereit or Go- vernment to remit this condition, and contract at fifteen per cent, fimply for an annual fupply. I can never ac- quiefce to make his office a mere office of fupply, and fubject the Company to the burthenfome lofs of renewing yearly fuch periihable ftores; the perplexed and intri- cate manner in which the account annexed to Mr. Francis's minute is drawn, obliges me to oppofe to it a more fimple and comprehenfive one, mewing the periods ; the amount of the (upplies, and the commiilion, to the id of May, 1779, from the id of May, 1777, in which period the firft purchafe of 150,2311. 8a. 30. mull: ( 39 ) muft have been renewed twice at the expence of the agent, and the fubfequent ones to the thirtieth of April once. I will not propofe that the commiffion drawn of fifteen per cent, in the courfe of the fame period fhould ftand oppofed I am convinced none of the other offices of fupply are fo low, or in which the fervices of the agents have a meaner reward. I agree to the propofition for keeping up a depofit of provifions for the garrifon of Fort William, on the terms of the exifting agency on a contract for five years. The Governor General defines the following Minute may be recorded on the proceedings in reply to Mr. Francis's of the 17th of Anguft : / o Mr. Harwell has already fo fully anfwered every ob- jection urged by Mr. Francis, againft the propriety of continuing to Mr. Belli, the agency for fupplying the garrifon of Fort William in provifions for five years, that any further remarks from me appear to be un- necefiary, but when I confider Mr. Belli's fituation in my family, and the acrimony of ftile difplayed in Mr. Francis's protefr, as well as the feveral insinuations contained in it, I cannot help deeming the violent oppofmon he has made to my motion, as perfonal ; and viewing it in this light, I Ihall trouble the board with a few remarks upon the fubjecl, after having thankfully acknowledged how much I think myfelf obliged to Mr. Bar well (wha fever were his motives} both for the readinefs and abil/ty with which he has refuted the arguments offered by Mr. Francis againft this mcafure. Mr. C 40 ) Mr. Francis begins by obferving. thit this contract is in direft oppofition to rhe Coajpan\ '^ ordris. and that the bufmefs has hitherto bv.cn performed by- agency, &c. To furnifh a depofit of provifions for the garrifon of Fort William, is not bulinefs for p: jia?mtion, nor to be difpofed of to the loweit bidder, for the rr-ions which I before ufed, and which Mr. Francis, I know not why, has quoted again/l it. An agency with a fixed rate, and a fixed commifTion, is to all intents and purpofes a contraft. All that I have now propofed is, to fix the term, and to bind the contraft by penalties. I can by no means agree with Mr. Francis, that the agent victualler enjoys the mod profitable employment that ever exifted in this government. Mr. Lii-ius has an agency with 1 5 per cent, commffion en articles rated by former charges of :^s } of courfe greatly above the real coft. Mr. Livius is pro- ffjfedly patronized by Mr. Francis, ivho paj/es bis bills. Nine or ten lacks thus paid to bim, are yet unaccounted for. In an anfwer to Mr. Francis's infinuation, that it 5s natural enough for the agent to vvifh to fecure hiin- fclf, before the expiration of the prefent govern- ment, / avow the fall as to myfelf y as well as to the agtnt. When 1 fee a fyftematic oppofnion to every meafure propofed by me for the icrvice of the public, by which an individual may eventually benefit, I cannot htfitate a moment to declare it to be my firm belief, that that fliould the government of this country be placed in the hands of the prefcnt minority, they would feek the ruin of every man connected with me. // is therefore only an att of common juftice in me* to wijh to fecure them, as far as I legally can, from the appr eh en/ion, of future opprej/ion. Mr. Francis has grofsly mif-flated my minute, when he fays, I affirm the contractor has fuftained heavy lofTes, by the indefinite term of his agency. I am forry to add this to the many inftances upon record, during the courfe of our debates, of the inaccuracy of Mr. Francis's quotations, and his fubfequent reafonings in confequence. , I faid he was " fubjefted to many "heavy lo/es, and fame be has aftually fuftained in the purchafe of articles at 20 per cent, above the table of rates-" on the capital article of grain, he has indeed been a gainer, his pur- chafes having been luckily made at a time of plenty, and his fales, with the public apprehenfion of a fcarcity. His fuccefs in this inftance has alarmed him for the future, and with reafon. Suppofe the reverfe had happened, with his inde- finite agency, which may expire to-morrow, he can only venture to purchafe what is immediately wanted, and that he is obliged to provide. He cannot venture to invell a large capital in diftant commiffions. Of courfe his purchafes, by being made at hand, are from the deareft, as well as the neareft markets. He may buy his rice at 20 feers for the rupee ; he may be un- der the necefiity of felling it at 40, and this one article proves his ruin. With what propriety can the profits of this agency be (tiled immoderate ? G The ( 4* ) The rates were fixed by accurate and actual rates of the market, and the agent was allowed the cuftomary commiflion of 15 per cent, on the purchafes, he was obliged to change the (lores, and allowed for damages (which in many would be the lofs of the whole, and in all of fomething) 15 percent, on the prime coft, fo fold. This Mr. Francis calls 30 per cent, and rates it as a clear profit. Befides this drawback, the agent, as will appear from an infpeclion of his books, if called for, has frequently been obliged to purchafe ftores at a price far exceeding the allowances made to him by the Company. In the purchafe of Ghee, he loft 20 per cent. Moong 25 ditto Turmerick 171 ditto Oil 52 ditto Salt beef 33 ditto He is likevvife liable to lofies in the tranfportation of goods to Calcutta, and by an adventure from Pur- nea lad leafon, fuftained a lofs of 10,000 rupees. Mr. Francis, dating the fum of current rupees 2,29,912, as a clear gain to the agent, makes no de-. duclion for the loffes I have fpecified, nor has he con- fidered the decay, waftagc, fervants wages, cooley hire, and other unavoidable expences, attending the agency for near three years ; but in order to fwell this fum as much as poffible, he has included in it, about 70,000 rupees, as received by the agent, though the rifk for which it was paid to him will not expire 'till May, 1780. Mr. Francis once thought differently of my plan : the ( 43 ) the words of his minute delivered on the 4th Novem- ber, 1776, when it was firft read at the Board, were, " If fibs fervice be nccejfary in any degree, if is" a fervite of the firjl necejfity, and JJsould not be /tinted for the fake of any inconfiderable faving^ which in the event perhaps might only be apparent," I am firmly of opinion, and am happy to be con- firmed in it by the fentiments of the commander in chief, that the fervice muit continue of the firft neceflity, while we continue in poffeffion of Fore William. I alfo mod heartily concur with the commander in chief in opinion, that the Board could not confer a contract of this importance on a gentleman of more honor and integrity than Mr. Belli, or who could more confcientionfly difcharge the duties, of it. In reply to Mr, Francis's obfervation, that Mr. Belli enjoys the favor and protection of government, I do moft folemnly declare that he has never applied jo me for the moft trifling interference or fupport in his agency. I have one remark to make on the fubject of this agency fince Mr. Francis has thought proper to make fo pointed an attack upon it. He muft remember how flreF.uofly it was oppoled by rhe late General Claver- ing in its feveral ilages. His prqteih and remarks were tranfmitted to the Court of Directors, and were received at a time when our proceedings were rigidly fcrutinked, and when every meafure propofed by me which could be deemed in the fmalleft degree objecti- onable, underwent the feverelt comment.- My plan for fupplying Fort William with prov.i- fions, palled without a remark ; and this is to me a G 2 convincing ( 44 ) convincing proof that the Directors efteemed it to be highly beneficial to the company*. (Signed) WARREN HASTINGS. Houghly t id Oflober, 1779. Mr. Francis, I HAVE not feen Mr. Harwell's minute in which the Governor General affirms, that every objection urged by me againft the contract propoftd to be given to Mr. Belli for five years, is fully anfwercd. I did not know that'fuch a minute exifted ; and unlefs facts can be altered, I cannot for my own part con- ceive it poflible, that mine can be refuted. The Go- vernor General's minute was tranirnitted to me this morning. If recrimination does not imply an admiffion of the charge, it certainly is no defence againft it ; I cannot allow that one abufe is juftified by another; nor am I bound to anfwer any objections, whether valid or not, to the agency for (lores held by Mr. Livius. The Governor General and Mr. Harwell had juft as much concern in giving it to him as I had. If it be liable to abufe v wby is it not cornElcd ? if bis profits are too great) ivby Lave they not been reduced ? Mr, Haftings and Mr. Bar-well have had abfolute power in their hands for above three years. It is fa id " that Mr. Livius has an agency with fifteen fer cent, commijjion on articles rated by former charges cf commiffaries ; of courfe greatly above the real coft." If the Yet the Dire&ors have feverely cenfured it, in their letter by the Gcnet-ai Barker ; but being flow in their proceedings, it en- couraged Mr. Mailings to infer in his own favour, that they had approred it. ( 45 ) the afiertion were true in terms, it remains to he ex- plained, even on the principle of precedents, bc~jz the giving fifteen per cent, to one agent \ juftifies giving per cent, to another. MefT. Robinfon, Killican, and Crofies reported that 20 per cent, per ann. would be a reafonable commifiTion to Mr. Belli. Mr. Haft ings and Mr. Bartvell, nevertheless gave him thirty. With refpeft to the military (lore-keeper's book of rates, the fad: is, that it was formed by the late Colonel Dciv, with the approbation of the Board of Ordnance, not by the former charge of the commiffaries^ but by an enquiry into the aftual Bazar prices of that period; whether Mr. Livius gains or lofes by thofe rates, is unknown to me. I believe that occafionally he may do both. I have no right to examine his mercantile books, nor does it concern the fervice in qusftion. It is faid that " Mr. Livius is profeffedly patronized by me" I recommended him to the office of military ftorefteeper. and I would maintain him in the jult rights belonging to it, on the fame principle, on which I would infift on his performing the duties of it j thus far my patronage of Mr. Livius has extended. But it is faid, " that I pafs his bills ," the aflertion, as it ftands expreffed, may be fuppofed to be a mil- take. The Governor well knows, that I refigned the employment of comptroller of the offices from the end of December, 1778; and that I have repeatedly urged to him the necefiity of requefting fome other member of the board to undertake it from that period. Places cf influence and profit, are not feen fo eafily relinquished. If the accounts of the public offices have not fince been examined, the Governor General, I prefume, will afTign his reafons for it to the com- pany ; neither is it true, that I ever patted Mr Livius's kill 'in the fenfe plainly implied by trie Governor: they ( 46 ) they were conftantly examined by Mr. Baugh and his affiilant, with the utmoft ftri&nefs, before they came to mt for their final confirmation. My diary is before the Court of Directors, it was not poflible therefore, that I could favour Mr. Livius, or any body elfe, unlefs Mr. Baugh and I acted in collufion, I defire that he may be examined at the board upon his oath, and in my abfence, concerning the manner in which I executed my part of the examination ; and I mod ear- neftly requeft of Mr. Wheler, to make a motion in my behalf to this effect, at the next Board of Infpection: I leave it to the Governor General and Mr..Barwell to put fuch queftions to him as they think fit. It would be much beneath me to make any other reply to the conclufion evidently meant to be drawn from the fup- pofed fact " of my faffing Mr. Livips's bills" but than I receive it as it defer ves. " Again it is aflerted, " that nine or ten lacks thus paid to Mr. JLJvius, are yet unaccounted for." I do not know what the amount of the military (lore-keeper's difburfemcms may be fince December laft, having no concern in the examination of his accounts. The fecretary has the monthly accounts before him, and I defire he will (late the amount in this place, (current R's. A. P. rupees 4,13,965 : 13 : 6) the military (lore-keeper's accounts of his di(burfements being given unto him every month, and a balance ftruck before he receives a farther advance for the enfuing month, it cannot truly be faid, that the (urns he has received fince December laft, are unaccounted for. If his accounts are not ex- amined, it is not his fault. Any perfon unacquainted with the tranfaction of buiinefs fn the military ilore-keeper's office, and who fa.w only in what circumltances, and with what ap- parent ( 47 ) parent view it is afierted, " that nine or ten lacks thus- paid to Mr. Livius, fmce December loft, are yet unac~ counted for" would naturally conclude that this money was all on account of his agency for the provifion of military ftores. For if it were not fo, the comparifon between his fuppofed profits, and thole of Mr. Belli (to fhelter which, Mr. JLivius's name and office are manifeftly introduced) proves nothing, and falls to the ground. Now the faft is, that the greateft part of the monthly fums iffued to Mr. Livius, are advanced to him as military ilore-keeper, not as agent. Out of thefe he pays his own office charges by a fixed eftablilh- ment ; the eftablifhment of the commiflary general's office, with the price of all the articles furnifhed by Lieutenant Colonel Green by contract ; the price of all the powder furnifhed monthly by the powder con- tractor ; and many other contingencies. In the ma- nagement of all thefe difburfements, the military ftore- keeper pays as fart as he receives, and has no profit whatfoever, not even that of having a fum of public money for a mort time in his hands. It is a fact, not unworthy of notice in this place, that all the other heads of officers, receive their monthly advances twenty days before he does, owing to fome difficulty ofadjuftment between him and the Commiflary, by which in this refpect they both fuffcr. The following ftatement which I have defired the fecretary to fill up, will mew what proportion the fore- going difburfements, bear to the total amount of the military ftore-keeper's advances, fmce December laft. Firft, Total amount of advances, Current Rupees. from January, 1779, inclufive 442105 : 7 : 6 Second ( 43 ) Second, Amount of office charges, as per eftablifhment for ditto 6899 : S : o Third, Amount paid to Lieutenant Colontl Green, for ditto 16321 17:8 Fourth, Ditto to the powder con- trar'-or 124^05:14:9 Five, Ditto of all other contingent 'exptnces 122116 2:10 Total Current Rupees 2,69,943 : i : 3 Difference 1,72.162 : 6 : 3 To that part of the Governor General's minute which immediately follows, I (hall make no anfwef. He fuppoies his facts, and draws his ccnclufion from them. Perhaps we ought to deem it a proof of his moderation, that he has not endeavoured to iecure his friends in the pofTefTion of all the lucrative contracts, as well as employments, for the next twenty years; and that he has confined the intended operation of his in- fluence to fo (hort a period as five years, "-after the ex- piration of his adminiftration. He had full as good a right to do one as the other. I have quoted the Governor General's own words at length ; yet he fays, " that I have grofslymis-Jlated his mi- nute" At the worft, I could only have been guilty of a mifconftruclion, of which every man, who reads my minute, would be able to judge, having the Governor's words literally quoted before him ; I did really conceive that it was meant to be afferted. or underftood at leaft, that Mr. Belli had fuffered heavy lofles and inconve- niencies. ( 49 ) niencies. It did not occur to me, that he could have made " frequent remcn/irances concerning ibt heavy loffis and inconvcniencies to which he wasfuljefled by the prefint in- definite term of his agency." Ir, in fact, and after an ex- perience of near two years, he had fuffered no fuch lofies and inconveniences, we are therefore to att;ibute thefe frequent remonftrances of _the agent, not to any loHes and inconveniences he has actually fuftained, but merely to the quicknefs of his apprehenfion. He finds himfelf fubjefted to loffes, of which hitherto he had no experience, and nothing lefs than a contract for five years can fecure him againft them. Here ne would think we might be fure of our fals, and that the argument might be concluded. The Go- vernor General, however, is pleafed to take new ground ; after charging me with having " grofslymifjlaledhis mi- nutc" in the conftruction I gave to the words, " fub- jcfted to many heavy lofles" he himfelf now averts, that " Jome he has aclually fujlaincd." The word t: fame" I prefume, mud refer to heavy lojjes ; and, if that be true, my confl.ruclion of his original words is no other than what he himfelf now gives them, and confirms ; if not, he mud be underftood to have intended to weaken his own argument, by faying, that the agent was only liable to heavy lofles, when he might have laid, as he does now, that he had actually (uttered them. I have Hated the whole commiffion as a clear gain to the agent, from a conviction, that it was, or might have been fo, or within a mere trifle of it. In the fupply of articles of provifion, the bazar market retail rates of Cal- cutta are the higheft that could be taken. A contractor, who purchafes in grofs quantities in the different parts of the country in which the articles are produced, ought to gain at leaft enough between the purchafe and the Company's price, to defray all charges of mr;baudize H and ( 50 ) and other expences whatfoever, confidering always that he trades with the public money, and not with his own. r The plan to which I originally gave my affent, was propofed at a time when I thought that an invafion of thele provinces was a probable event. That apprehen- fion, whether well or ill-founded, was the ground of this and feveral other opinions delivered by me, tending to prove the expediency, if not neceffity,. of putting thefe provinces in a pofture of defence. 1 he Governor Ge- neral conftantly treated the idea of an invsHon as chime- rical ; yet, in this inftance, as well as in many others, in which our military and naval eftablimments have been, on his principles, very unnecefiarily augmented, he afted as if he thought the apprehenfion of an invafion was not ill-founded ; his opinion has been juftified by the event, but they both condemn his conduct. I never would flint a neceflary fervice for the fake of any inconfiderable faving. I thought this a neceflary fervice at ihe time when it was propofed, and I would not have Hinted it : not that I difregard little favings, but bccaufe 1 know, by experience, that while they are at- tended to, the great ones are neglected. But admitting that the circumflances of public affairs were not changed, as I affirm they are, is this really the fame plan to which I originally gave my confent ? Did I ever confent to al- low the agent a commiflion of thirty per cent, per annum againft the opinion of the merchants to whom the reie- reTice was made, and whofe opinion was to have decided the quellion ? On the contrary, did I not remonftrate againft it ? Was the binding the India Company by contract to maintain a fpecific garrifon m Fort William, and in one particular mode, anj whether they approved of -it or not, and under every poflible change of the cir- cuuiftarices of the government, ever fuggeited to me at the time the agency was pr.'ipofed-r If thcie questions can- not ( 5' ) not be anfwered in the affirmative, it follows, that it is not I who think differently of the plan, but the Gover- nor General, who has changed his plan for a purpofe in which the public fervice has no concern. On the remainder of the Governor's minute I mall make no remarks, though not for want of materials ; I content myfelf with doing my own duty, and leave it to others to anfwer for themfelves. (Signed) P. FRANCIS. On the .6th of Oflober, 1779. SIR, I defire you will fend the inclofed minute in circula- tion, J remain, Sir, your's, E. WHELER. In confequence of the rnoft earned requeft of Mr. Francis, I move, that Mr. Baugh may be examined at the board upon oath, concerning the manner in which Mr. Francis hath examined and pa (Ted the accounts of Mr. George Livius. And I muft further defire, that his (Mr. Baugh's) examination may be taken in Mr. Francis's abfence. . W. Extracl; Confutation the i ft of November, 1779. Mr. Baugh attending the board in confequenc of the motion made by Mr. Wheeler, and entered in the laf); confutation, is admitted. H 2 Read Read - The motion of Mr. Wheeler. Mr. Francis.- My intention was, to give the Gover- nor General -an opportunity of iatisfying himfelf, and doing m juftice, upon the points alluded to in the mo- tion. I do not infift upon his oath, becaufe I am per- fedtly fatisfted that his teflimony will be equally valid without it. As I was Tick at Houghly at the time the jnotion was made, I did imagine it would be refolved upon in my abfence, but I have no difficulty about its being determine^ now. Governor General. I mall put no queftions to Mr. Baugh in the mode prefcribed , I think it very irregu- lar. I have not even given Mr. Francis's minute an in- tire perufa-, although I have kept it by me for fome time with the intention of examining it, and of replying to it, if I had found it neceffary. Other bufmels of more i i poitance, a ilrong averfion to perfonal debate, and a convi&ion of its inutility for any purpoie, either of dec fion here, or of reference at home, have hitherto concurr d to make me poftpone it. Mr. Baugh is now before the board at the requifLion of Mr. Francis. I fhall leave it to Mr. Francis to put what queftions he jhay think proper to him, either upon oath, or other- wife. Mr. Whttler. I am called upon by Mr. Francis to take a part in this difagreeable bufmefs, tthich is exceed- iogly irkfome to myfelf, and becomes ftill more fo by the Governor General's declining to put any queftions to Mr. Baugh. if time had permitted a fhort anfw:er to Mr. Francis^ laft minute, it might have anfwered the fan:e purppfe as the queftions which I jnuft now addrefs fo Mr. Baugh, and I doubt not but the anfwers will give the board every fatisfaclion they can require. Mr. ( 53 ) Mr.lFhecler delivers the following queftions to~"be put to Mr. Baugh. ill. Whether it is not your duty, as afliftant to the comptroller of the offices, to examine the monthly ate* counts of each office before they are feen by the comp- troller, and to furnifh him with whatever remarks may- have occurred to you thereon ? Anftver. Preparatory to the comptroller's examining the accounts of the offices, they have always been exa- mined by my affiftant, fo far as reipecled their calcula- tions and additions, after which they have been compared by me, with the vouchers delivered with them. 1 have then compared fuch charges as wereeftabliftied, with the fixed eftablilhments ; alfo fuch charges for ftores pro- vided by contraft, or by agency, with the terms of the different engagements for thofe fupplies. And if upon, this examination I have difcovered any deviation from either, I have pointed them out to the Comptroller, who has either immediately deducted the difference, or ap- plied to the head of that department, whofe accounts were under examination, for an explanation. 2nd. Whether you have not constantly done fo ? . Yes, I have. gd. Whether you have ever obferved, that Mr. Francis, in examining the accounts of the military (lore keeper, or of any other of the public offices, or in palling their bills, or in any other inftance whatfoever, has favoured the military ftore keeper, or any other perfon, or has ever fuffered an error or overeharge m his or their accounts, to pafs without correction and cenfure ? Governor ( 54 ) Governor General. I beg that Mr. Baugh may be difpenfed from anfwering the third queftion, if there is a neceflity for it ; it is highly improper on many ac- counts, coniidering the wide diflance betweerrMr. Baugh and Mr. Francis, trmt he fhouid be obliged to anfwer to fuch a queftion. / do not rccoUcd what words of mine have given eccofionfor it ; but if I have made lift of any, which either directly lay fuck A charge to Mr. Francis's account, or imply it. I rdratl them, without accounting at this time for the manner in zvliich anyfach exprejfions may have efcaped me, as they are now entirely out of my memory. 'The objetl of t/ie queftion therefore is remmed. Mr. Francis. I am (atisfied, and defire the queftion may be waved. 4th. To what point of time have the military ftorc keeper's accounts been examined and paffed by the Comptroller ? Anjw. To the end of December, 1778. /;th. What is the amount of the monthly fums ifTuecl to and from the treafury for the monthly difburfements of his office, including his agency fmce December 1778, to the end of September lalt ? Anfw. The advances made to the military {lore keeper from the treaiufy, between the ift of January and goih of September, 1779, a m o unt to current rupees 4.24,000; but in this fum is not included his advance on account of September, being 42,000 rupees, becaufe it did riot'pafs the board in time to be iflued during that i. 'i he order of the treafury was not figncd till 1 .iber ; and I pbferve, by the eftimate < ? s difburfements for October,, that the ed till the 6th of the lad-mentioned month. ( 55 ; month. In Mr. Francis's minute of the 2nd of Oc- tober, the amount of the advances iffued to the military flore keeper to the end of Augiift, is Hated by me at current rupees 4.42,105 17:6; but it is proper to remark, that in this ium is included the monthly pay- ments made to him by Mr. Robert Stewart, on account of the new powder works, and his receipts for ready money fales. 6th.. Has the military ftore keeper deli verect'frftis monthly accounts regularly to the Comptroller's office fince December laft ? Anjw. Yes, to the end of September. Governor General. I defire to put the two following queftions to Mr. Baugh. ift. Have Mr. Livius's accounts ever appeared before the board ? 2d. What is the amount of Mr. Livius's receipts and difburfements, from the time he firft had charge of his prefent office, to the date of my minure in September ? If Mr. Baugh cannot anfwer the laft of thefe queflions from his own official knowledge, I defire him to obta'.n proper official information to compleat his anfwer ? i ft Anfto. They never have appeared before the board. It was not the intent of the regulations conftitutirig the Comptroller's office, that they mould be laid before the board. 2d Anjw. Not having the neceflary materials in my poireffion for furnilhing the accounts required by the Governor General, I applied for it to the military ftore keeper, and beg leave to lay before the board the fol- lowing ( 56 ) lowing abftrafts, which I have in confequence received from him, of his recepts and difburfements from April 1775 to September, 17795 inclufive, the former amount- ing to current rupees 23,16,074 : 13 : 3 ; the latter to 23,1678 11:3, which conftituted a balance in fa- vour of Mr. Livius, which he had actually advanced for the Company, inftead of being nine or ten lacks in ar- rear.. Mr. Livius was appointed to the office of military (lore keeper on the 2oth of March, 1775, and the Go- vernor's minute is dated in September, 1779. I think it proper to acquaint the nnard, that my ap- plication for this account would have been made to the Accomptant General, and not to the military ftore keeper, could the former have furnished it complete. But the general books being balanced only to the 30th of April, 1778, it could not have been prepared from them to a period fabfequent to that time. I believe alfo, that the entries in the general books^are a dj lifted from the abftracts of the receipts and difburfements fup- plied to the Accomptant General by the heads of the different offices. Minutes -i ( 57 ) Minutes en the Advance Salary and Appointment to Sir Eyre. Coots. Extratt Board of Infpettion the I2tk of April, Read the following propofitions of Lieutenant General Sir Eyre Coote. That the five half mares of the revenue do devolve upon Sir Eyre Coote, as Commander in Chief, from his arrival in Fort William on the 2%d of March, and that General Stibbert do only mare as oldeft Cobnel from that time. That the 3000 rupees per month, lately granted to General Stibbert for contingent expences in the field, do devolve on General Coote, from the 311! of March, as Commander in Chief. That the 16.000 rupees per annum, for fecret intel- ligence, do devolve to General Sir Eyre Coote from the 3 lit of March. Sir Eyre Coote delivers in the following minute. The reference I made to the board on the fubjeft of General Stibbert's allowances, which exceed mine by 82,750 rupees per annum, proceeded from an idea, that they were granted to him as Commander in Chief, under the preiidency ; and as, on my arrival at Fort William, he could be no longer confidered in that ca- pacity, whatever he drew under fuch a denomination rnuft neceiTarily be difcontinued to him. An examination of the minutes of Council has ren- dered me mafter of the fsveral reafons affigned for granting him tbofe allowances ; and my refearches on I this ( 58 ) this occafkn have led me alfo to a knowledge cf the fen timents which have been exprefied by the members of the board in- general, refpecting the infufficiency of the falary allowed by the Court of Directors to their Com- mander in Chief in India. . From a long experience of the fervice, I am thoroughly convinced of the juftice of this opinion, and I am equally certain, that the Court of Directors never meant I Should fuffer in my private fortune by carrying on the public fervice. . * You will pleafe therefore, Gentlemen, to adopt fuch rreafures as may prevent any unnecefTary expence from falling on the Company, and which will at the fame time enable me to execute the duties incumbent upon me, as their Commander in Chief, to vifit the feveral Rations of the troops, or to take x the field, if neceflary, without involving myfelf in expences, which I ihould be unable to fupport. (Signed) E. C O O T E. Mr. Franci? : . 1 have prepared my option on the Commander in. Chief's proportions, and beg leave to lay it before the board. My opinion on the account of General Stibbert's al- lowances is very fully dated in the confutation of the 14th of May, 1778. and I adhere to it in every parti- cular. I think they mould new be reduced to the efta- blifhment at which they ftood during General Clavering's command. This eftablifhment was formerly referred to the Company, and confirmed by them in their letter of the 24th of December, 1776, paragraph 49. I cannot ( 59 ) -cannot confer^ to any variation from the allowances fixed by, and enjoyed by General Ck the Company's orders. The very l.'ft which thev given, and which Sir Eyre- Coote brought out with, him, dirtft, that ' ieivenant General Sir Eyre Coote do receive the fame pay as Commander in Chief of their forces in India as was received by Lieutenant General Sir John Clavering. If all the allowances dated in the proportions are agreed to, the j. relent Commander in Chief will receive eighty-two thoufand two hundred current rupees per annum more than was received by fris predecerTor. (Signed') P. FRANCIS. Mr. Bar well, AS I expect irj a ihort time the orders of the Com- pany on the additional allowances drawn by Brigadier General Stibbert, there does not appear any urgent ne- cefiity to proceed on the regulation of iuch allowances until the arrival of the Company's in It ructions. The Court of Directors, in fixing the eftabliflied falary for a commander of all their forces in Jndia, have exprefled it as a falary. They therefore certainly intend it to be drawn free, and difburthened from all diiburlements to be incurred in the immediate execution of their military fervice ; they certainly did not intend to put the Com- mander in Chief of all their military forces upon a meaner eftablimment than the provincial Commander in Chief at the other prefidencits, or General Stibberr, whofe allowance by the 4gth paragraph of 'their letter of the 24?h of December, 1776, is reckoned at 82,000 rupees. Thefe fads are lo very ftriking, that I cannot doubt of our having full authority to regulate an efta- blilhment for Sir Eyre Coote, while in the field, as may be fuitable to his high rank, and b?ar fome proportion I 2 tO C 60 ) to the allowances made to the fubordinate field officers of this government. I am for the queftion, that a field efiabltfhment be formed for Lieutenant General Coote, Commander in Chief of all the Company's forces while in the. field. i Governor General, .. THE allowance of five half mares of the com million on the revenues was not an eftablimment annexed to his ftation, but a bounty fpecially and perfonally granted to General Stibbert, by the order of the Courc of Directors in the 31(1 paragraph of their general letter of the i6th of April, 1777. It cannot, there- fore, be taken from him, but by the fame authority. The allowance of 3000 rupees per month for con- tingent expences in the field was granted to General Stibbert by a feparate act of this board, though their reiblutions upon this fubject have been various, yet the opinions of the different members, refpecting the ne- cetTity of fuch an allowance, have been generally the fame, as may be feen by the proceedings of the board of the 29th of February, 1776, when this fubjecl; was nrft brought under the confideration of the board, and for other reafons rejected. For the truth of this, I ap- peal particularly to the opinions of General Clavering and Colonel Monfon. This was never meant as an allowance annexed to the ftation of Commander in Chief, for when it was firft propofed, General Stibbert was not confidered as invefted with that character, but to defray the unavoid- able expence attendant on the command in the field. As the refolution of the board upon this fubject: has been long fince referred to the Court of Directors, with another; ( 61 ) another relative circumftance, which muft force their attention to it, and draw from them a clear decifion upon it , and as that decifion may be expected with the firft difpatches of the fealbn, I think it would be im- proper and irregular to make any alteration in it at this time. I do not recollect any orders which authorifes Gene- ral Stibbert to draw a fixed fum for lecret fervice. This is an expence in its nature variable, and the Court of Directors, in their letter of the 24th of December, 1776, have exprefsly directed that it ihall not be fixed, but that Colonel Stibbert, (that is commander in the field) Ihall be paid fuch expences as Ihall appear to us to have been neceflarily incurred by him, from time to time, on that account. I apprehend, that this is a fervice which will pro- perly and exclufively belong to the Commander in Chief, whenever his fituation will enable him to aflame the charge of it, and that General Stibbert fhould be accordingly directed to conform to his orders refpecl> ing it. Refpecting the incidental charges of the Commander in Chief, when he is in the field, or which in this point will be equivalent, when he is ablent from the prefi- dency, I fhall premife the following obfervations : ift. The prefent allowances drawn by General Stib- bert is as follows : Fays f 62 ) Pays Brigadier General, 750!. per arm; 7,500 Table expences in the field 60,000 Contingent expences in the field 36,000 Commiflion in the reverine, current ru- pees, 21,368, or 19,250 Sonat Rupees 1,22,750 I do not reckon the allowance for fecret iervice, be- caufe I regard it as a public charge, in which he has no interefG or other concern, than faithfully to difburfe what he draws. Of :he above eftablifhment the following fums have been allotted to General Siibbert, by the expire fs ap- pointment of the Court of Directors : Pay as- Brigadier General r 7,500 Table charges in the field 60,000 Comrniffion on the revenue at that time, as I' find it computed in Mr. Francis's minute of the 14?^ of May, 1778, cur- rtnt rupees 245486, or 22,059 Sonat Rupees 89,559 The falary allowed to the Commander in Chief, by the fundamental regulations of this government, is 6oool. psr annum, or rupees 60,000. The fum is exprefied to be in lieu of all charges and contingencies 'in the field ; but the Court of Directors have fince granted to their firit Colonel on this efta- bl'mment, as I have remarked above, an annual ftipend of 80,559 rupees, a fum exceeding that of a Com- ler in Chief by nearly 50 per cent. But But it cannot be fuppofed, that the Court of Direc- tors ever meant to invert the order of the fervice, and that in fo great a degree, as to make a partial and un- juil diftinction between an officer placed, not by ie- leclion, but by cafual fucceffion, at the head of a fingle eftablimment, and the Commander in Chief of all the Britifh forces in India ; therefore, when they pafied thefe grants to Colonel, now General, Stibbert, they virtually eftablilhed a precedent for a proportionate aug- mentation of the allowances of the Commander in Chief of all the Britifii forces in India -, for it cannot be dif- puted, that his unavoidable expences in the difcharge of all the various duties annexed to his (tation mutt greatly exceed thofe of General Stibbert in a limiEted command ; and I will prefume, that had it been at the fame time propofed to afcmain the allowances of the Commander in Chief, they would have augmented them proportionably. On the premifed grounds, I move, i ft. That the Commander in Chief be allowed to draw for the expences of his table, when he is in the field, 90,000 rupees per annum. 2. That the Commander in Chief be authorized to draw for the following eftablifhment for himfdf and his ftarT, when he is in the field, in lieu of travel- ling, and all incidental charges whatever. 12 Budge- 64 12 Budgerows 30 Bosts 10 Elephants 200 Coolies 3.8 Hircarahs i Head ditto i Naib 50 Lafcars- 1 Serang 2 Tindals 4 Hackeries 2 Gurry Men 3 Writers Stationary 12 Ilorfes 150 40 75 5 7 3 15 30 . 7 iSoo I2CO ~ 75 1000 196 15 4991 400 20 30 12O 15 "~ 1 5 2OO 360 S. Rs. 6286 The fums which I have annexed to the eftablifhment are added merely to ihew the computed amount of it, but are not taken from any correct authority, nor meant to be a part of the proportion. If this motion fhall be agreed to, it will be the province of the CommirTary General to affix the rates of expence to each article, and 1 lhall propole that they be referred to him for that purpofe. Mr. Francis, On the principles on which the opinion I have al- ready given was founded, I have much more reafon to object to the eitablilhment now propofed, than to the Commander in Chief's firft proportions. All the al- lowances granted to General Stibbert, as Commander in ( 65 ) in Chief, or otherwife, and which I have conftantly objected to as exreiTive, are to be continued ro him ; and, at the lame time, a total new dtabliftment created, amounting to the monthly charge of current R. A, P. R. A. rupees, 15,302 : 7 : 5. or 1,83,629 : 8 per annum. I am againft the motion *. Mr. Barwell, I cannot concur in opinion with Mr. Francis, (hat the propofed cftabl'Ihment is a double one. I do not underftand thefe allowances are to be drawn upon any other occafion, than that for which it was txprefTed, for the General's cxpences in the field. There is no im- mediate call, that I know of, upon the Commander in Chief to leave the prefi dency-f- ; and, before a month is paftVd, we mall, in all probability, receive the osders of the Court of Directors, whether Brigadier General Stibbert is to draw the allowances which he is in- titled to receive, or whether they are ro ceafe. In either cafe, the neceflity of the eftablilhment now pro- pofed for the Commander in Chief of a ; l the Com- pany's forces is but a fingle eftabliihment ; nor is this a monthly eftablifhment, or if it was, is it of the ex- tent dated ? It is an eftabliihment only to be drawn when the public fervice calls the Commander in Chief from the prefidency. That it will be drawn, I ad*r>it -, but it is not probable it will be drawn through the whols year; bcfides, it is a charge limited to a ipecifte (urn, but does not neceffarily include the expenditure of the whole amount. I agree to the propoiition. Governor General. I agree to the proportion. * He left it, however, in a ihort time thereafter, and lias tal- en care not to return in a hurry ; it was ongina.iy underitood tp be Jo. f l-ie was afterwards allowed I zoo rupees per uioiuh in addition to the above allowance, Rtiblvcd, ( 66 ) Refolved, that the Commander in Chief of the Com- pany's forces in India, be allowed to draw for the ex- pences of his table, when he is in the field, the monthly fum of feven thoufand five hundred Sonat rupees, or ninety thoufand current rupees per annum. Refolved, That the Commander in Chief of the O mpany's forces in India, be allowed to draw for the following monthly eftablimtnent for himfdf and his ftaff when he is in the field, in lieu of travelling and all incidental charges whatever, when in the field. 12 Budgerows 30 Boats 10 Elephants 200 Coolies 28 Hircarahs i Head dnto 50 Lalcars 1 Serang 2 Tmdals 4 Hackeries 2 Gurry men Stationary 12 Horfes. Ordered, That this eftablifhment be referred to the Commiflfary-General, with directions to affix the rates of expence to each article, fpecified therein. Mr. Wheeler having delivered the following minute, on the foregoing proceedings being Ihewn him by the fecretary, it is entered in this place for the fake of .connection. Mr. Wheeler The argument made ufe 'of by the Governor-General, to evince the neceflky of an aug- mentation of allowances to {he Commander in Chief when when in the field, are by no means fufficient to 6b~ obviate thofe objections, which from a perfecT: know- ledge of the regulations alluded to, fuggeft themfelves to my mind. In the firft place, the allowances to the commander in chief by the fundamental regulations of this government, was not an aft of the court of directors, but of the pro- prietary at large, convened together for that purpofe; and by their orders, communicated to their fervants in Bengal, by the executive part of their conftitution, the court of directors. Thence it appears to me, neither optional in the court of directors, to ericreafe or dimi- niih an allowance voted to their commander in chief by a general court of proprietors ; for if it was, with the fame degree of propriety that the court of directors could revoke the orders of their conftituents by augment- ing an allowance fixed as above to their commander in chief, they might revoke any and every acl; of the pro- prietors at large. It naturally follows, that the court of directors do not in themfelves poftefs the power of altering the allowance fixed, to the office of commander in chief; and it is equally conclufive with me, that no luch power can pof- fibly be vefted in our board. But even admitting their power , it is plain from the fth paragraph of their general letter, dated the yih of May 1778, by the Stafford, that it was not their in- tention to deviate from the eftablifhed allowance, granted to their late commander. . Without entering therefore into the detail of this bufinefs, or expreffing my difapprobation of the enor- mity of each particular article of increafe, I (hall content myfclf with objecting to any further allowances being made to Lieutenant General Sir Eyre Coote, that the K 2 court C 68 ; Court of Dhetlois have in the 6oth paragraph of their letter, dated the 2^th of March, 1774, directed to be paid to Lieutenant-General Sir John Clavering ; an extrat of which I ihall here iubjoin, <; And that there fa paid to him the fum of fix thoufimd pounds fterling per annum, in full for his jerques as com- mander in chief, and in li'U of travelling charges, and of a'-l other advantages and t.mo!umtnts whatever, except his fdary of ten thou/and pounds fxr annum, eftabli/Iied by law, and ordc-ed to be paid him as one of the. council at Fort William in Bengal." E. WHELER. Minutes in council, on the treaty with the Rana of . , Gohud. Extract Secret Department Confukation. . November i2th, 1779. The Governor General informs the board, that during their late recels, he has had feveral conferences with the Minifter deputed by the Rana of Gohud ; and inveflrd with full powers on the fubjecl; of a treaty of aHiaiice ofFenfive and defen.Uve, propofed by the Kana, to be concluded between him and the Company. , The Governor-Central lays before the board a draft of conditions which he has formed on the balis of the Rana's propofitions for fuch a treaty , and which, with the Rana's letters and propositions, he defires may be entered in this place, for the informations and opinions of the board. (Signed) WARREN HASTINGS. Drafc of Treaty. Article ift. A treaty of alliance, ofFenfive and de- fen five fenfive, {hall be eftablifhed between the Englifti Com- pany and Maha Raja Ranna Lohinder Bahadre. 2d. Whenever a war (hall a&ually take place be- tween the contracting parties and the Marattas *, if the Rana (hall require the affiftance of an En glim force for the purpoles hereinafter defcribed, fitch a force, proportioned to the exigency of the fervice /hall be im- mediately fent, on his requifition made in writing to the commanding officer at the near eft ftation of the Company's troops ; JJoall remain with him as long as he [hall require it, find return when he Jhalldifmifs it -f, the expence thereof fhall be defrayed by the Rana at the fixed rate of twenty thoufand Muchle dar rupees of the currency of Banares, or any other fprcies of rupees of fame intrinfic amount, for each battalion of the Seapoys, on their prefenc eftablimment, wiih their proportion of artillery . The payment to commence on the day when the faid force fhall pafs the borders of the Company's do- minions, or tne dominions of the Nabob of Oude : and ceafe on the period ftipulaced for its return to cither i four cofs being allowed for each day's march. 3d. The force mall be employed for the defence of the Rana's dominions againft all foreign or domeftic enemies, and for the enlargement of his dominions by conqueft on the Marattas. * 4th. Whatever acquifition in purfuance of this treaty (hall .be made of countries being contiguous to the * The Marattas were then at war with the Rana of Gohud, and his forts attacked. f Thefe were the ftrange powers to Sujai Dowla, to exterminate the Rohillas. The Rana had not wherewith to pay his own troops. ( 7 ) the Rana's dominions, or formerly appertaining to them, whether effected by his or the" Englifh troops,' feparateiy or in conjunction, or obtained by treaty, ihall be fhared in the following proportion?, viz. 'nine anas to the Company, and kven anas to the Rana:' the mean amount of the grofs revenue of the Com- pany's (hare collected in time of peace in the ten y-: ars preceding-, after deducting the charges of collection, which (ball be ascertained by Aumeeris chofen by each party, fhall be fixed and paid by the Kaha as a per-' petual tribute to the Company, and the lands and forts Ihall be ceded to the Rana. 5th. In cafe it fhall be judged advifeable to em- ploy the combined forces of the Company and rhe Rana in any diftant operations againft the common enemy beyond the borders and neighbourhood of the Rana's dominions, on requifition made in writing from this government, he (hail furnifh ten thoufand horfo for iuch fervice -, and each party fhall bear his own feparate cxpence, 'which (hall continue feparate until the return of the combined army to the borders of the Rana's country, or until it fhall be employed in the iervices mentioned in the third article of this treaty.' * 6ih. Whenever the Englifli forces are employed for the defence of the Rana's country, or for the ac- quifition of territory, the fervice to be performed fhall be prefcribed by himfelf; but the mode of executing it fhall be left to the direction of the officer commanding the Englifh troops. 7th. Whenever the combined troops of the Com- pany and the Rana fhall be employed in any re- mote operations, fuch as are delcribed in the 5th article, the commanding officers of the Englifli forces (hail -confult the Rana on the choice of the fervice to ( 7' ) to be performed, but the ultimate decifion, in cafe of' a difference of opinion, and the mode of conducing fuch fervice, fhall be left entirely to the commanding officer of the Engliih troops, with a reiervation of the Rana's complete authority over his own troops. 8th. Whenever peace fhall be concluded between the Englifh Company and the Maratta flare, the Rana jhdl be included as a party in the treaty which Jhall be made for that purpofe ; a nd his prefent $offe]Jions, together with fuch countries as be (hall have acquired during the courfc cf the ivar, and which it Jhall be thenftipulated to leave in his poffeffion, Jhall be guarantied to him by fuch treaty*. 9th. No Engliih factory fhall be eftablifhed in the dominions of the Rana. No perfons of any denomi- nation (hall be fent into his dominions, on the part of the Engliih Company, or with the licence of the Governor-General and* Council, without his previous confent, nor any authority exercifed over them buc his own -j-. Ordered, That thefc papers lie for confideration. Extract Secret Consultation; 2d December, 1779. Confidered the Governor- General's minute, entered in confiscation the 12th of November, with heads propofed * The Rana is a natural enemy, the Company but an occafional one : yet this treaty of alliance, modeftly engages *he Company to compel the ableft power in India, as the only condition of a peace with them, to be reconciled to an irreconcileable enemy/ And that that enemy's po/Tefiions, though incapable of preferring them, fhall be warranted by the Company, at all events. f Of what benefit will the treaty be to a commercial Coifipany on thefe conditions ? ( 72 ) propofed for a treaty to be concluded with the Rana of Gohud. Read the letter from the Rana, recorded in the books of thePerfian correfponder.ee, received the yth of June laft ; alfo another letter dated the 5th of Shau- baun, and received the gd of September. Read the propofed heads for a treaty with the Rana of Gohud, entered in confutation the 1 2th of November. The Gov-r;ior General lays before the board the following amended draft of a treaty propofed to be executed \viih the Rana of Gohud, and defires that it may be fubftituted for the former, and entered in confuitation the 12th ult. As it contains fuch alter- ations propofed by the Mivifter of the Rant, as the Go- vernor-General deems reasonable. And to the treaty in this form, the Minister, who is now preient, declares his entire concurrence. Draft of a treaty propofed between the Company and Maha Raja Leukinda Bahadre. Articles of agreement, made and concluded at Fort William, in Bengal, between the honourable the Governor-General and Council for the affairs of the Honourable Englifh Eafl India Company on the one part, and Maha Raja Leukinda Bahadre, Rana of Gohud, for himfelf and his fucceflbrs on the other part *. Article ifh Perpetual friendfliip mall take place be- tween the Englifh Company and Maha Raga Leukin- dar * The remarks made in the preceding articles are fufficient for thefe ; with this only difference, that the alterations in this are powerfully in favour of the Rana, and againft the Company. ( 73 ) ous characters in HinZo/itm- Gauzi t C 83 ) Gauzi, Oiien C-rton, and Coffim All Cawn, are fafts fo notorious, that I cannot yet fuppofe any member of this board to be ignorant of them; and there are not only prefump ive. but very ftrong proofs of the ower of the man, whofe ftate could rove an afyJum to fuch fugitives. His perlor.al abilities are" equally known. They are univerfally acknowledged, and proved by his actions. I have faid that the object of the treaty, and the Operations dependent on it, are reftrifted to a ftate of ivar .with the iVjarattas. A war, in which with refpect to the immediate commencement of it, independent of former caufes, they muft be the aggrejfirs, ly rejecting the offers of peace which zue have made to them. If after all, my fuppofition fhould not be realized by the event, but a peace enfue, the treaty becomes in itfelf null, being recuced to the fimple tie of frlendmip, which alters nothing of the relative ftate in which we are at prefent with the Rana ; and all the confequences which Mr. Francis concludes that it will entail upon us, which fuppofe a war with the Marattas, are certainly more likely to happen from fuch a war, if we have no fup- poru, than with a provifion to avert them. I have had fuch frequent occafion to complain of the unfair man- ner in which Mr. Francis quotes my words and opinions, that I mall make no other reply to his affertion of the contradiction of the prcfenn meafure to my own principles, than that the exprefilon which he has quoted appertains to a different occafion, and a different ob- jecl, and bears no more relation to the prefent fubj eft, than the difpatch of treaiure to Bombay or Surat. Mr. Francis. Neither Mr. Wheeler nor \, have profeffed to be ignorant of the exiftence of the Rana of but when a treaty offenfive and defenfive is M 2 propofed ( 84 ) propofed to be concluded with him, I prefumeit is not enough to know that he exiils. I, for my own part, fhould have held myfelf indebted to the Governor- General, as I always am, for any information he might have thought proper to give me of the circumftances and fituation of this 1 Rajah. It is probable that I might have endeavoured to obtain it myfelf from other quarters, if at any period fince my arrival in Bengal, I had thought it poffible that an intimate connection of in- terells between the Company and him fhould ever have been propofed. When a fimilar treaty was in agitation with a much greater Prince, I mean Modajee Boofla, the Governor-General introduced the proportion with a very particular report .of his fituation, views, family, connections, refources, and interefts. The lights which the Governor-General's lad minute have furnifhed me, do not tend to eftabhfh a favourable opinion either of the Rana's character or ftrength. 1 do not wifh to be connected with a man who is only known by the pro- tection he afforded to ptrfons fo obnoxious to this go- vernment, and to India in general, as Coflim Alt Cawn, and Gauzi Odien Cawn , and as to the ftrength \vhich enabled him to give them that protection, I be- lieve it to be purely defenfive. He is a hill Rajah. I conclude he has ftrong holds in the mountains, and th^it it is not eafy to come at him. Admitting it to be true, that at this time, and to fuppo'rt a war, which it is faid is the effect of the decided orders of the Com- pany, alliances with fome of the country powers might be ufeful and neceffary. It does not follow that all and every alliance dcf.rves that character. It is not at all unlikely, that we may find ourfelves encumbered and embarraffed with the burthen of a ufelefs ally. I mean If) ufe the words applied by the Governor-General not Jong ago, to our connection with Ragoba, and I am fur* I exprefs the fenfe of them ; an offenfive union with Hyder Ally, or the Nizam, or even with the Raja of oFBerar, if He could be feparated from his countrymen, might indeed on the principles of the prefent war be of importance to its luccefb. The Rana of Gohud is too inconfiderabie to be of weight in either fcale , but if his ftrength were greater than it is, it would not neceflariiy follow that we fhould gain any thing by uniting it to ours. Before fuch a junction can be effected, we mufl crofs the Jumna, and relinquish all the fecurity and other advantages \vhich the intervention of that great barrier affords to all our poffeffions, and to thofe of our ally. By the faid a6t we divide our force, and make it difficult, if not impracticable, for the different parts of it fo fe- parated, to affift each other. Every operation we under- take on either fide of the river, fo tar from adding to our ftrength, or diftreffing the enemy, is only laying ourfelves open to wounds in a quarter where, if we itaid within our barrier, we might be invulnerable. We relinquifh a (ituation of fuperior ftrength, to meet an enemy, if we do meet him on equal terms. I (hall trouble the board but with one word more. The Go vernor-General, it is true, has often complained of un- fair quotations ; and this complaint I am informed, has been echoed in England, but I do not admit that it has ever been made with reafon; let an in fiance of any moment be pointed out, and I am ready to join ilfue upon it. Governor -General. . I have never made the co'r.plaint againft Mr. Francis of an unfair quotation, but 1 have poinred out the inftances and proved them to be un- fair. The prefent inftance is before us. I do remem- ber that when we were firft informed of a war between Great-Britain and France, I faid that our part of the war mult be purely defenfive, becaufe they had all to gain, and we to lofe. I do not know that thefe were the words, but I am lure that this was the fubftance and fenfe of the maxim which is now quo:ed as a con- tradiction ( 86 ) tradition to the propofal which I make of withftanding a predatory enemy, already in poficffion of a great part of Hindoftan, by diftant and offenfive operations. For the reft of Mr. Francis's minute, I do no: think it ne- ceffary to reply to it, having, I think, in all our con- tefts allowed him the lafi argument ; and I think the fubjeft was fufficiently difcuffed in the preceding mi- nutes. Mr. Francis. I admit that the maxim which I have attributed to the Governor-General, was introduced on the occaiion he mentions ; I neverthelefs undei flood it to be a general one, at leafl, it certainly could not be confined to the cafe of a war * ith France, fmce at the fame point of time we flrongly recommended, and by our aififtance promoted the fiege of Pondicheny. Governor- General. Let it be added, that I at the fame time propofed a mfafure, which from its tendency led to the poffibility at leaft of an offenfive war with the Marattas. And this pronolition was made in the fame minute in which the maxim now attributed to me was introduced ; and I will venture to fay, will not be un- derflood from thefe minutes ; neither from thofe of Mr, Francis and my own. Agreed to the amended draught of the treaty. Ordered to be engrofled fair, and executed. Extract Secret Department Confultations, 6th December, 1779. The following minute from the Governor- General was fent in on Saturday lad ; and agreeable tp his direction was circulated to the members of the the board. Governor ( 87 ) Governor-General. Having in confequence of the treaty paffed the board for an 'alliance with the Rana of Gohud, required his Vakeel to produce the powers with which he \vas inverted for executing it on the part of his matter, he delivered me a paper which I (hall lay before the board at their next meeting, containing fimply the Rajah's public fcal, and which with his letters, declaring the Vakeel to be deputed for the purpofe of concluding fuch a treaty, are deemed fuf- ficient and ample authority according to the form and ufage of Hindoftan ; but as the Rana has not fet his name to the paper, and with us the fignatures of th contracting parties are held injifpenfible to the validity of all the public engagements, I informed the Vakeel of this defect in his powers. He requefted that they might, with the addition of his own feal and fignature, be admitted for the prefent execution of the treaty, and to remove all doubt, and authenticate it according to our forms, he made me a propofal, which I now lay before the board, under his hand and feal, for fending a perfon on the pa r t of this government to witnefs the Rana's final execution or' it, and exchange the ratification ; and 1 recommend it for their ap- probation. (Signed) WARREN HASTINGS. Arzee from Mazhar Ally, Vakeel of the Rana of Gohud. " As I underfland from what you faid, that the cuftoms of your country require contracting parties fhould fign their names to the treaty, to give it credit and validity, I am therefore hopeful, and make it my requeil, that fince the Rajah in his letters to you, has affured you of the validity of my powers, you will for the prefent accept of a furd with my fignature, and the feal of the Maha Rajah ; and that a gentleman of trutt may ( 88 ) may be fent to the Maha Rajah, that all the points which have been fettled here, may be finally concluded there, in the prefence of fuch gentleman ; and that in like manner as I have repreiented many things on the part of the Maha Rajah, fuch gentleman may obtain fatisfa&ioii in 'all matters, and fee the Maha Rajah let his fignature to the treaty. This will be highly pleafmg to the Maha Rajah, and gain me credit with you." The following opinions were returned to the above minute and Arzee. " I agree to the propofitions. (Signed) R. HARWELL." Mr. Francis. If the Vakeel be not inverted with fufficient powers to execute the treaty on the part of his conftituent. we ought not to have proceeded with him lo far as \ve have done. The extent of his powers ihould regularly have been afcertained in the firfl in- flance. For my own part, I am perfectly fatisfied with the Rajah's leal, and the contents of his letters. It is not likely that he mould refufe to ratify a treaty by which he is entitled to, and impowered to require the afliftance of our forces, for the defence of his country, or for the acquifition of territory, without any other limitation or defcriptiou of the amount of fuch force to be fent, immediaidy on his rcqiufition, except that it mall be pro- portioned to the exigency of the fervice : of which the Rana is to be the judge. The deputing a gentleman, on purpofe to Gohud, to fee the treaty ratified, is, in rny opinion, a very ufeleis, and I am fure it will be a very expdniive meafure. I am therefore entirely againfr it. I do not even know that the Rana's fignature is wanted. wanted. The public feal on both fides is the true au- thentication of their public afts refpeftively. (Signed; P. FRANCIS. (Agreed to the above,) E. WHEELER. Refolved, That a perfon on the part of this govern- ment be deputed to the Rana of Gohud, for the purpofc. offering the treaty executed by the. Rana, and for the changing the ratification. The Governor-General now produces to the board the power and treaty above recorded, under the feal of the Rana of Gohud. Vide, the Book of Perfian Correfpondence under date. The Governor-General thinks it incumbent on him to lay before the board the following paper of intelli- gence, which was inclofed in a letter to him from the Commander in Chief. Extratt of a letter from Futty-gur, 20th Nov. 1779* " I have likewife juft now received from Gohud, the difagreeable news of the Marattas having made themfelves matters of the fort Arhaund, (which I had the honour to inform you fome time ago was inverted") and put the garrifon to the fword. The fame account informs me, that they are preparing to attack another fort, and that the Rajah is by no means in a condition to oppofe them ; his troops being not only inferior in point of number to the enemy, but alfo difpirited and ready to mutiny, on account of the long arrears due to them, which he is at prefent unable to pay. In this fituation of his affairs, the fpeedy conqueft of his whole N country C 9 ) country muft be the confequence of the enemy's purfuing their advantage with that brifknefs which the defence- lefs ftate of it teems to invite." Governor General. Having communicated this intel- ligence to Meer Muzzur Ally, the Rajah's Minifter, he informed me, that he had received no letter from his matter fince his arrival, and therefore concluded that the danger ftated as impending on his country from the Maratta invafion, had been much exaggerat- ed , but thought it probable that the port of Arhaund, mentioned in the intelligence, had been taken by the Marattas ; that it was fituated in the fouthern extremity of his dominions, and not capable of much refiftance. There can be no doubt that a Maratta force has entered the territories of the Rana of Gphud, though of itfelf not likely to be productive of any material confequence. It appears to me to be part of a plan, which I was lately iaformed by a channel which I have hitherto experienc- ed to be of good authority, had been confulted by the ruling adminiltrauon of Poona, for the general conduct of the war againft the Company, namely, that Nana Furneie and Hurry Punt Furkia were to conduct the war againft General Goddard j and that Madagee Scin- dia and Tuccajce Holkar were to unite their forces, and proceed immediately againft the Rana of Gohud, to reduce his country, and afterwards enter the Douab, and the dominions of the Nabob of dude, or into^the countrits dependent on Bengal; as the circumftances of the times Should direct them probably to either. I have fince heard that this plan has been changed, and that all the chiefs above mentioned had united their forces, and were preparing to march directly againft General Goddard. It appears however, equally necef- fary to guard againft any attempts which may have been projected againft the Rana of Gohud, and to ftrengthen his f 9' ) his hands, to enable him the better to aft in concert with us, if that defign, from whatever caufe, (hall have been fufpended. I therefore move, that a copy of the treaty which it has been agreed to conclude with the Rana of Gohud, be immediately tranfmitted to the Commander in Chief, with inftrufHons to comply with any immediate requifition which the Rana may make for a detachment of our force?, proportioned to the. exigency of the fervice required by it, of which he will of courfe be the judge.. Mr. Wheeler. I am againft the motion. Mr. Francis. If the Board were difpofed to make a right ufe of the intelligence contained in the preceding letter, I mould have thought it a fortunate circum- flance, that we had received it before any thing had been finally concluded with the Rana's Vakeel. The Rana of Gohud's fituation appears, by this letter, to be confiderably worfe than it was reprefented to me. One of his forts was taken j the Marattas were prepar- ing to take another, and the fpeedy conqueft of the whole country was likely to be the confequence. If this be the cafe, we are going to execute a treaty with a Prince, who may have neither army nor any domi- nions left. His army is difpirited, and ready to mutiny for want of pay, which he is unable to give them. If he cannot pay his own troops, how will it be poffible for him to difcharge the fcbfidy which he engaged to p^y for ours ? Inftead of enlarging his territories by con- queft, which is the profefied object of the treaty, our firft labour will be to recover for him, what he has already loft j and this mud be attempted by marching part of our army to a confiderable diftance on the other fide of the. Jumna. I do not con fide r the prefent in- yafton of his country by the Marattas, as belonging to, N 2 or or the effect cf any particular plan of operations againft the Company. He is at conftant enmity with the Marattas, and I look upon this attack as nothing more than the continuance of former hoftilities againft him. At all events we (hall only diftrefs ourfelves, and aban- don the protection of our frontier, by engaging in his defence. I am, therefore, againft the motion. Mr. BarwelL I agree to the motion. I cannot adopt the opinion, that to allow the Marattas to con- quer a country, fo near our frontier, and extend their poflefllons quite up to it, will be attended with any of thofe advantages which have been fuppofed as the pro- bable refult of our not cppofing their progrefs. The intelligence that has been lain before the Board, rather determines me to engage our government in the fup- port of the Rana of Gohud, than to leave the country an eafy conquelt to the only enemy from whom we have reafon to apprehend any mifchicf. Agreed to the Governor-General's motion. And ordered that a copy of the treaty with the Rana of Gohud, be immediately tranfmitted to the Commander in Chief. Secret Department Confutation, Eec. 13, 1779. The Governor-General propofes that Captain Palmer be permitted to draw the fame allowances during his deputation to Gohud, as were afllgned to Mr. Elliot, on his deputation to Berar. And that Mr. Tho. Short be appointed affiftant to Captain Palmer, with the lame allowances as were granted to Mr. Farquhar, afilftant to Mr. Elliot. Mr. Wheeler. I have not yet confidered the bufmefs which ( 93 ) which Captain Palmer is going to undertake, in die light, or of the fame importance wiih that which was entrufted to the charge of Mr. Elliot. At this diflance of time, I do not properly recoiled:, whether the al- lowances given to that gentlemen, were not objected to by me. However, I do not mean to revert to a former opinion, upon a fubject fo perfonal as the prefent; though I would wifh the allowances had been fuch on this occafion, as 1 mould have judged fafe to have ac- ceded to, which, as they are now dated, I mufl beg leave to decline. Mr. Francis. Mr. Elliott's allowances amounted to 3318 cur. rup. per month, thofeof his afiiltants to 555, in all 3873. I think they are much too high for the prefent occafion ; and as Captain Palmer is only deputed to lee the treaty with the Hana executed, he cannot have any ufe or employment for an affiftant. Mr, Barwell. I think the allowances for Mr. Elliot, were regulated by thofe allotted to Colonel Upton, on his embaffy to Poona; and however large they may have appeared to the Court of Directors, I have reafon to think that neither Colonel Upton nor Mr. Elliott were enabled to make any confiderable faving from their allowances. The circumftances in which Captain Palmer is placed, is nearly the fame, and the appearance he mud make, muft be regulated upon the fame prin- ciple. The difference of rank between Colonel Upton and Captain Palmer can be no rule to direct the judg- ment, on this occafion. He is the fervant of Govern- ment, in the fame line as Colonel Upton was, and he muft fupport the fame character. 1 therefore aflent to the motion. Agreed. That Captain Palmer be permitted to draw the ( 94 ) the fame allowances as Mr. Elliott, viz. Lieutenant- Colonel's pay, and double batta 1488 fonat rupees per month, fixed falary 1000; and contingencies, in- cluding mounchies, fervants, &c. 500. That Mr. Shorr, as afliftant to Catain Palmer, be allowed the fame 21 Mr. Farquar, v iz. pay and batta of a Captain, 512 fonat rupees person th. FINIS. 27 35 University of California SOUTHERN REGIONAL LIBRARY FACILITY 405 Hilgard Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90024-1388 Return this material to the library from which it was borrowed. UNIVEFw - 696 University Southe Libra