UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT LOS ANGELES ANTICIPATION OF THB S P E E C H E S, Sec. [PRICE TWO SHILLINGS.] 5242 ANTIC IPATION OF THE SPEECHES / INTENDED TO BE SPOKEN In the HOUSE of COMMONS, On FRIDAY, MAY 4, tJPON THE MOTION OF ALDERMAN NEWN- HAM, RELATIVE TO THE AFFAIRS OF THE PRINCE OF WALES. LONDON: Printed for G. K E A R S L E Y, No. 46, Fleet-ftrf et. M,DCC,LXXXVII. [CntereU at Ration?*?' KEARSLEY has jujt Publi/hed, [Price 43. Sewed] A NEW EDITION CORRECTED, OF LOVE AND MADNESS: IN A SERIES OF LETTERS, ONZ OF WHICH CON T A IKS THE ORIGINAL ACCOUNT OF CHATTERTON. GOVERNOR." Who did the bloody deed ?" OKOONOKO. ' e The deed was mine. " Bloody I know it is } and I expeft " Your laws fliould tell me h. Thus, fclf-rondemn'd, " I do refig-n myfelf into your bands, " The hands of Juftice." Orooaokt. V. j. o u= 53 2 ( 3 1 ^ ^ANTICIPATION, &c. FRIDAY, MAY 4, 1787. 5 ^| ^HE notice which Mr. Newnham f -- had given of his intended motion, relative to the income of the Prince of Wales, had filled the Houfe of Commons, at four o'clock, with a greater number of members than have lately attended their parliamentary duty; and the Chancellor of the Exchequer appearing, as ufual, about that hour, and the Speaker having called to Mr. Newnham, the honourable Alderman opened his intended motion nearly in the following manner : " Sir, I am concerned to find, by the feveral anfwers of the Right Honourable A 2 the [ 4 ] the Chancellor of the Exchequer relative to thebufmefs of this day, that the welfare and interefU of the heir of the crown fhould be one duty of importance by which the minifter can be charged with a neglect at once derogatory to the dignity of the crown, and the honour of the na- tion. To repel an invitation to difcharge a duty fo indifpenfable to his fituation, by averting the neceffity of the royal commands, is to feek a fanction from the filence of the crown that renders the neg- ligence more unpardonable. It is with every fervent teftimony of loyalty, which can be exacted from a member of this Houfe, that I now rife to vindicate the interefts of the nation in the eafe and profperity of the Prince of Wales, and to fupply, by the timely interference of par- liament, a dereliction of his Highnefs's IP welfare,, difgraceful in the eyes of foreign nations, and inglorious to this country. f* As I [ S ] 3 ) would be bed difcharged by moving the order of the day. Mr. Powis rofe and obferved, Mr. Speaker, I (hall not trefpafe long upon your time, but I mould hold myfelf inexcufable were I upon this occafion to give a filent vote. In a queftion fo highly interefting to the body of which I have the honour to be a member, and to the country of which I am a citizen, the exertion of my poor abilities is a duty from which I cannot exempt myfelf. As long as my voice can be heard, will I warn you of the impending danger, and urge my vaticina- tion o: the alarming confequences of a- dopting the meafure propofed. I am far from impeaching the intentions of the worthy Alderman who made the motion, his underftanding has been the dupe of his heart, the kindnefs of his nature has 2 led led him into the miftake. I do flatter myfelf that the fame difpofition will in- cline him to withdraw his motion when he mall be convinced of his error: with- out any further exordium let us come to the point, and let gentlemen recoiled that it will be impoffible for us to in- creafe the Prince of Wales's revenue, without becoming fliarers in his difgrace and partners of his crimes. If he be allowed to be profligate, (and who can doubt it,) we fliall be confidered profli- gate too; if he be extravagant, we mall alfo be branded with extravagance; if he be regardlefs of decency and good man- ners, we (hall affift him in trampling them under foot; if he deride the folem- nity and loofen the holds of conjugal en- gagements, we (hall fecure him impu- nity; if he fly in the face of his coun- try's laws, we (hc\\ enable him to in- fringe them with effect; if he live in a flate ( '5 ) &ate of difobedience as a fon, we mall in- fufe poifon in the cup, which he offers to the lips of his parent: And are thefe phantoms of the imagination, are they Sir, wild chimaeras without foundation or fubftance? No, Mr. Speaker Would to God they were not realized by exifting facts, by facts of univerfal notoriety. Had it pleafed the Prince to be lefs overt in his offences ; and, if he muft be vicious, had he confined to a narrower circle the effects of his vice, I fhould have been the laft to publifti to the world tranf- actions at which my foul fickens and which I would fain forget for ever bat no event is of greater publicity the fun mines not upon a man in England who is ignorant of the Prince's conduct. And oh! what a conduct! he has dab- bed the morals of the nation I fear be- yond hope of recovery j he hc-s broken down the barriers of propriety and order. I am ( 16 ) I am not in my nature fevere there arc many whom I rejoice to fee in their places on this occafion, to whom I can with confidence appeal : but not to be roufed at a time like this, when an offender feeks a flicker within our walls who deferves to be punimed, when he expects to find excufe for every crime who ought to be incapable of any, and from us, who ought to be moft impla- cable, being mofl injured -, nay, afks re- ward for his mifdeeds, would argue an apathy and infenfibility to which I ac- knowledge Mr. Speaker, I am a ftranger. 1 honour and obey my King, I love his family} but, paramount to all other confi- derations, I deem the duty which I owe my country; when her interefts are affeded I cannot be indifferent; when her laws are violated, I muft complain j when (he receives a wound, I bleed from my heart. I fee all thefe things involved in the ( '7 ) the prefent queftion, and I therefore pray and entreat the Houfe that they will not difgrace themfelves, and injure the coun- try who has chofen them her reprefen- tatives, by agreeing to the prefent motion ; as they will thereby invite every future P ce of W s, who may happen un- fortunately to be born with the fame propenfities, to follow this P ce's exam- ple. Sir. J. Erfkine rofe, and addrefled the houfe to the following effed. Mr. Speaker, I never rofe with fo ftrong a conviction that the caufe I was about to defend was the caufe of right, as I feel at this mo- ment. It is the caufe of honour, the caufe of juftice, the caufe of human nature it- C felf. ( "3 ) fclf. If my known attachment to the Prince of Wales, be objected to me as a difqualifying circumftance towards form- ing a juft judgment on the fubject, let it plead alfo forthe warmth, theagitation, the anxiety which I experience in fupporting a meafure fo near my heart. But why mould it be confidered an impediment in fo plain, fo obvious a queilion? A queftion which is anfwered by every dictate of philanthropy, which without partaking of metaphyfical refinement, goes directly to the feelings of every man. By them let it be tried. I do not difclaim an appeal to the paflions: it is fit they (hould be confulted, but it fhall be my aim to intereft your paflions through the medium of your judgment; and if this can be effected, in all events I pught to prevail. I confefs I am earneft in the bufinefs. The walls of this houfe \vould brand me with indifference were I not ( '9 ) not moved to fee an amiable young prince adorned by every accomplimment which can perfect the manners, and dig- nified by every quality which can recom- mend the heart, his foibles and impru- dence ferving but as a {hade to virtues, which would otherwife mine too bright;--* the heir apparent to the Britim empirej to fee him I fay expofed to ridicule and obliquy, by the ill-timed parfimony of a Britifh parliament ; to obferve him thus meritorious denied by a great people, the indulgence which a good father would \ accord to an offending fon, to find him reduced to a ftate beneath his rank j nay, opprefled by the deadening weight of in- digence without relief. -Is it not enough to roufe the indignation and wound the feelings of any but the moft obdurate foul alive? Even fuch a one could not be indif- ferent. I am fure I need not caution you Sir, againft believing the vague and idle C 2 rumours ( 2 ) rumours which ftalk about our ftreets againft the Prince of Wales of his keep- ing company with this and that de- bauchee, of his continuing in a perpetual ftate of intoxication, and of his negleding the acquaintance of thdfe noble perfonages who compofe the luftre of the other houfe, and who are the beft qualified for hisfociety. The bare relation of fuchftories is fufficient to excite laughter and exclude belief fo improbable in their nature, fo fubverfive of the truth 1 You know Mr. Speaker, and the greater part of the houfe muft know, that the Prince of Wales not only aflbciates with the nobility of this country, but that he is cherifhed and be- loved by them ; nor could that be the cafe if, in the long catalogue of crimes for which he is arraigned, by a fervile and envious group of dirTembling court fyco- phants, there appeared one founded and eftablifhed which was inconfiftent with a man 2 a man of honour or a gentleman. To believe it would reflect a degree of dif- honour upon their lordfhips, which I hope no member of this houfe can poffibly attribute to them. But we have heard a very impaffioned and declamatory ha- rangue from a worthy gentleman, whofe age did not promife fo mucn fire, and from whofe character fo much acerbity could not have been expected. I con- gratulate the houfe on the difcovery they have made of the nature cf his abilities, and hope that before long we (hall fee his warmth directed to a more proper ob- ject. He has certainly attempted to prove but one thing to day, in which to be fure he has fucceeded ; but it feems to me this might have been done with much lefs trouble to himfelf and pain to the houfe. He might have convinced us that he was angry without the abufe of words, afiaffination of epithets, and wafte of time, time, by which his fpeech has been diftinguifhed. I dare fay, he fondly con- ceives that the philippic which he ha3 pronounced againft the unfortunate Prince! of Wales, will prove fatal to his caufe^ and carry conviction to the houfe that he is not a proper object of their bounty. But, good God, Sir, how is it potfible for common fenfe fo to err, or human rea- fon to be fo perverted ! Stripping the gentleman's fpeech of its high-founding ornaments and frenetic declamation, what does it amount to! Argument wrought in fallacy, and conclufion built upon er- ror. Let us particularize. He tells us that the example of the Prince of Wales, has injured the morals of the nation, and that he has broken down the barriers of decency and good manners. Were we fitting in a cenforial capacity, and trying the Prince for any offence againft the laws of morality, this allegation would be mod properly properly and pertinently brought forward : I mould in that cafe, have no difficulty in pleading not guilty; and if the gentleman could produce a fingle inftance of a vice become more fafhionable, or a breach of manners more tolerated now than before the Prince became the object of public attention, I wou'ddefiftfrom his defence. But we are not trying the Prince of Wales, or his merits would to God they might be fairly and fully inveftigated. Diffident as I am of my own ftrength upon that ground, moft cheerfully would I meet the fierctft of his aflailants, and upon the iffue of the conteft would I reft my caufe. This I take rather to be the point in controverfy, whether it be not eflentialtq the dignity of this country, whofe repre- fentatives we are, to fupport the rank, to maintain the honour, and to protect the fame of the heir apparent of the Britifh crown. crown, and, upon a ground of policy, upon a ground of propriety, upon a ground of duty, is it moft indifpenfable in my opinion. For fuppofing the foibles of the Prince to be as they are repre- fented to be by the enraged gentleman on the other fide of the houfe, derogatory to the character of fo high a perfonage, which would be, the wifer courfe, which would become us more to plunge him into defpair and hurry him on to ruin by our feverity, or to reclaim him by our liberality, to enable him to recover the points which he has loft, and to erafe from his efcutcheon the blots which may be found there ? The intemperance of youth never fails to be corrected by the folidity of maturer years, but the abandonment of hope is followed by an excefs of de- pravity and almoft inevitably leads to de- flrucYion. But, on the gentleman's own fuppofition, the argument turns fo clearly againft againft him, how much more fo will it appear, when weconfideras we ought that, inftead of being profligate, he is humane ; inftead of immoral, compaffionate j and that where he is reprefented as profufe, his expenditures are in the caufe of bene- ficence; that his ear is ever open to the tale of the unfortunate, and his purfe to relieve their diftreffes, that in his friend- fhiphe is fincere, in his deportment affa- ble, and that he never feels himfelf a prince but when he is exerting the power of doing good. I am aware that the ftrongeft objection, which will be urged this evening againft parliamentary inter- ference to relieve the Prince's diftrefTes, will be founded on the extreme delicacy of the queftion on the relation which fubfifts between his Majefty and the Prince; but, without meaning a difloyai or an irreverent idea that the father is inex- orable to the fon, this is not a reafon that D the the people of this country mould forget their duty to the Prince of Wales : but, on the contrary, if the King withold from him a fubfiftence fuitable to his rank, it becomes more neceffary and more indif- penfable for us to provide for his exigen- cies. I cannot perfuade myfelf yet en- tirely to leave the fubjedt, though I am fen- fiblethat I have already too long trefpafled on the attention of the houfe ; [here a cry of hear him, hear him, from the young members in the houfe j] but I fhall con- clude in a few words. When I confider the magnanimity of the Prince of Wales, in retiring from the fplendour to which he had been accuftomed, of his retrenching his expenfes and devoting one half of his income to the payment of his debts; I become an enthufiaft, and could never be fatisfied with repeating and reurging his claims to the attention of this houfe ; they are traits which imprefs upon my mind indelibly [ 27 ] indelibly the brightnefs of his character, and gold and jewels can add nothing to its luftre. The worthy Alderman, who brings the queftion now under your con- fideration, has my warmed thanks for his difintereftednefs and zeal upon the whole of this bufinefs j they muft recommend him to the admiration and efleem of all good men. But this will not be his only reward ; he will find an ample one in his own reflections, an inexhauftible fource of pleafure and Satisfaction will there be opened to him, his confcience will reward him, and peaceful will be that pillow where refts the remembrance of actions paft. Sir James Erfkin having concluded his very cordial harangue, was followed by Mr. H B to the following pur- port : D 2 The (t The refpect, Sir, which I feel in common with the Right Honourable Gentleman would induce me to decline entering upon relations which the worthy Alderman and the noble Lord have thought proper to advance ; but however reluctantly I do it, it is put out of my power to keep that feal upon my lips which a fubject of this extreme delicacy ought moil carefully to preferve. It is evi- dent to my mind that neither the honour, the intereft, northe inclination of hisRoyal Highnefs, areconfulted on this day, by the motion of the Honourable Alderman; for to propofe the conduct of fo exalted a per- fonage to theinquifltionofafree debate in this Houfe, is to excite the expofition of weaknefles, the publication of follies, and the hiftory of one indifcretion myfterioufly replete with every mifchief that can befal the inconfiderate indulgence of pafiion. The honour of his Royal Highnefs can- not not therefore have been confulted by the authors of this inquiry. As little have they confulted his Highnefs's intereft when they drag forward, in oppofition to the rules of this Houfe, a queftion fo evi- dently refting upon the option of the crown to prevent. And ftrange indeed muft be the infatuation to expert panegy- ric to prevail in a difcuffion of thecaufes of-his degraded fituation. Sir, it is pain- ful to me to advert to a period when the emancipation of his Royal Highnefs from thefuppofed reftraints of a wife education caft him into all the (hamelefs miferies of debauchery, and the difgrace of un- princely and profligate friendihips. The moment of national impoverifhment could not infpire a fingle dictate of patriotic ceconomy, and, with all the improvi- dence of delufion, the voracious fchemes of gambling harpies, and the fafcinations of beauty, plunged him into all the ne- ceffities [ 3 ] cefllties of anticipated revenue. To ex- pect redemption from that of the public, were to defire the heavy and incumbent preflure of national want, to be aggravated by a load of debt rendered fliameful by its creation, and ruinous to fuftain. So- indifpenfable does it appear to me, Sir, to the due difcharge of the duties of the Right Honourable Gentleman's fituation, and fo little confonant with every thing which my own fituation, as a member of this Houfe, renders obligatory to prefer before any other intereft that of the pub- lic, I do with the fulleft conviction of the wifdom and true patriotifm of the views of the Right Honourable Gentle- man, give my moft decided negative to -the motion of the Honourable Alderman. Mr. Wraxhall, who had rifen feveral times, at laft caught the eye of the Speaker, and began a fpecch fomewhat florid, [ 3' 1 florid, defultory, and continental, in which we fhould in. vain attempt to follow him pajfibus aquis but as nearly as the in- tricacy of foreign names, terms, and con- nections, will allow, a mere Englifh re- porter, we think he exprefled himfelf nearly in thefe words : " Sir, when I compiled the hiftory of the houfe of Valois, rendered fo eminent by the ever-memorable names of Francis and Henry, I could have been pleafed if, in my refearches into the antiquities of Gaul, I could have vindicated the race of thofe princes from the barbarous origin of the Franconian Goths, and the Scan- dinavian anceftry of Attila the Hun. The nil niji Cecropides, I have ever thought a fevere, but a juft farcafm, of Juvenal; and I am forry to fay that the reigning monarch excepted, the princes of the houfe of Bourbon, as of Valois, have [ 3* 1 have little to boaft of perfonal or official merit. Whatever my heroes have exhibited of that nature, have, as in my own adven- tures in Copenhagen, confifted principally in acts of gallantry. Sir, though princely inclinations of that fort were in more re- mote periods of fociety detrimental to the felicity of the fubject, I truft no argument can be drawn from fo flmple a fact to bear againft the motion of the Honoura- ble Alderman. " One fwallow," Sir, " does not make a fummer," The amorous paflions are not neceffarily connected with the moral or political du- ties of fovereigns or of heirs apparent. The Autocratrice of all the RufTias is a princcfs of that notorious falacity, that I am aflonifhed honourable gentlemen do not advert to the political innocence of fuch indulgencies. The allufion, Mr. Speaker, may be thought extreme, and I believe it is 5 for though Elizabeth may be _ be like MefTatina, laffata nonfatiatd y his Koyal Highnefs has never been charged with the indefatigable talent of a Maxi- mus*. The political parallelifm of the idea is what I wifh to imprefs upon the :>bfervation of the Houfe. It will in- lantly carry their imaginations towards :he Kneifter^ where the ftimulus of am- bition is feen to operate at Chsrfon, with ill the dignified virulence of an offended ind chaftifing fovereign. With the ve- ocity of a coffack, this enterprifing Czarina travels thoufands of miles to car- y defiance to the very beard of the Turk.'* VTr. Wraxhall was now interrupted by a :ry of " the queftion, the queftion." fc Do not gentlemen perceive," continued ;his indefatigable traveller^ * { how imme- * This emperor, when relating to his courtiers his capture of 200 virgins, added, quorum undecim ana Ptofie mm : and we fuppofe Mr. W. to have al- luded to this anecdote. E diately [ 34 ] diately allied with the queftion is the very brief circuit I have led the Houfe with the mofl able, as the moft amorous, of modern potentates; or muft I remind them that a limilar difpofition, though it rendered the ever-neceffitous Charles hateful to a once-affectionate and long* forbearing nation, will be no impediment to a refloration of the French provinces, by the enterprifmg arms of the prefump- tive heir of George the third ? Omnia vincit amor ! Sir, the Hyrcinian foreft, at this day reprefented by the fmall, but beautiful, foreft of Arden, unlike the de- ferts of Siberia affords " Mr. Wraxhali was again interrupted by a general cough- ing, and vociferation of " queftion, the queflion," fo he fmifhed rather abf aptly by declaring that it was his intention, had the patience of the Houfe permitted him, to have taken a very ftiort compa- rative, , r 35 i rative, profpective, and retrofpective view of the ftate of the royal families of Eu- rope, and deduce from the moft authen- tic teftimonies of his private correfpon- dence and perfonal intimacy with all the continental characters, orders, views, fyftems, and practices, that the interpo- fition of parliament was the only means competent to effect the purpofe of the motion of the Honourable Alderman, and which he ihould fupport by his vote, in order, by the way, he faid, to prove, that whatever regret he felt by the ftrange difconnection of this country with the powers of the continent, but one other fentiment or expreflion in the " fhort review," bore the fmalleft trait of his po- itical opinions or literary endowments, Sir G y P e T r. Sir, though I voted againft miniftry on, the mop-tax laft month, yet, Sir, I mall E 2 on [ 36 ] on this occafion vote with them, I think, Sir, that no occafion can arife again, in which I mall vote againft the Right Ho- nourable Gentleman at the head of the treafury, for I firmly and verily believe that if any man in England can fave this nation, it is the Right Honourable Gen-* tleman; and I have the moft implicit faith in his abilities} nay Sir, much more than I have, even in my own, For Sir, whenever I do not underftand the fubjecT: of debate, as in the Iri(h proportions, or lately in the commercial treaty, I always rely on his talents, and never, I verily be* lieve, was I once miftaken ; I mean, [here a cry to queftion,] Sir, I afk pardon for this digreffion. Sir, I agree with miniftry that an addition to the income of his Royal Highnefs ought not to be made ; nay, Sir, I am of opinion that it would be a very good fort of thing for fome gentle- men of abilities to move that it is l increafed, is increafing, and ought to [ 37 ] to be diminished" Sir, his Royal High* nefs has 50,000 per annum. It is all a faree, Sir, Lady P - ge and I the other night, entered fully into the bufinefs, and counted up the elegant things that this would furnifh, [a laugh.] Sir, I am in order, and in the underftanding of gentle- tlemen, [here Mr. Dr ke called hear, hear.] Calculation Sir, as my worthy abfent friend Mr. Eden fays, is the ground work of certainty and profit, and he al- ways followed that; and, like myfelf, al- ways had a book in which domeftic mat- ters and the compound intereft of every farthing was kept. Sir, on a calculation, I can prove that houfekeeping may be within 5000!. per annum, and here Sir are my documents. [Sir Gregory here produced a lift of houfekeeping expenfes, &c. &c. with an advertifement out of the General Advertifer, of block tin kitchen furniture, all within the fum of ten '. ( 38 ) ten guineas.] For thefe reafons Sir, and becaufe the Right Honourable the C r of the Exchequer thinks fo, I vote againft the motion of the worthy Al- derman. Sir L d K n, Matter of the " I am extremely happy, Sir, to find a fpirit of economy begins to pervade this Houfe, and infpire gentlemen with pro- per confidence in its defence. I am a plain man, to whom the advantages of an early introduction into good company was denied j and whom, indeed, I believe no funfhine of profperity would ever be able to warm into thofe little amiable atten- tions that diftinguim fine gentlemen. For my part, Sir, the boafted graces of my Lord Chefterfield have few attractions for me 5 and, indeed, Lady K n has often ( 39 ) often told me that the luxury of clean linen was an enfeebling indulgence, known only to modern days j for I can well re- member when Wednefdays and Sundays were the days for miffing in Wales. And this, Sir, brings me locally on the ground of debate. I object to the motion of the Honourable Alderman. The Prince of Wales mall never have my vote for what will promote the tendency to corruption in this kingdom, and introduce into his principality thofe luxuries under a want of which I myfelf was bred, and in an ig- norance of which I believe from my foul the Welch at this day live very happily.'* Mr. Martin, Mr. Le Mefurier, and Sir Richard Hill rofe together, but the Speaker bowing to Sir Richard, The Honourable Baronet congratulated him- felf, on having firft caught the eye of the Speaker, and faid he trufted that what he mould ( 40 ) mould have to adduce would be found to deferve a precedence, as his objections to the motion of the worthy Alderman were derived from no point of party, policy or politenefs to minifters, but from the infpirations of purity; habits of dream- ing,'* continued the Honourable Baronet, " and the patience with which this Houfe has formerly heard their interpre* tations, perfuade me that whatever other Honourable Members have to urge upon the queftion, that no one will difpute this truth : c that the encouragement of habits of unrighteoufnefs is beneath the dignity of Parliament/ Sir, I mean not to impeach the morality of the worthy Alderman, but he will give me leave to aflert the wifdom of obeying the dic- tates of a confcience, whofe purity is un- contaminated by the affociations of traffic and the interefted combinations of debtor and creditor. In the county of Salop, Salop refides no creditor of his Royal Highnefs, no impatience is there di (co- vered of a tardy payment of his princely debts nor the fmalleft deiire to increafe the pageantry of Carlton-houfe. Unani- moufly do they exclaim ' Woe to the land whofe princes eat in the morning but blefTed is that land whofe princes eat in due feafon for ftrength and not for drunkennefs.' A voice from the gallery here exclaimed, " I bet a tourte to an olio de Prince wins." The Houfe, upon inquiry, was informed that it proceeded from Weltjie, who had fallen afleep, but the Speaker having ordered him asapunifti- ment, to keep awake during the remain- der of the debate, Sir Richard conti- nued " thofe religious texts, Mr. Speaker, it highly befits the fuperintend- anceof this houfe not to infringe, and to fupply by their adoption of the motion of the Right Honourable Gentleman; the F fhameful (hameful negligence of the Archbifhop of Canterbury and the fpiritual courts. Sir, if my zeal as a Chriftian be exemplary in this Houfe, my fenfc of duty to Lady Hill, and the unbiased freeholders of the county of Salop, (hall be inftantly evinced to the fatisfaction of the Houfe. It is an axiom coeval with the eftablifhment of monafteries in Europe, that the duties of life ought to be fubfervient to the rules of piety and moral conduct, nor ought our actions ever to fwerve from fuch a direc- tion, for any gratifications that are not connubial. For my own conformity to this principle, I appeal to Lady Hill. Sir, the agitations of my laft night's dream were as detrimental to her repofg as the vifion which occafioned them was omi- nous of the defeat of virtue. I dreamt, Mr. Speaker, that the uncontaminated foul of Lady Hill had fullered the temp- tations of the evil one - to fubvert tho& practices ( 43 ) practices of purity, and privations of fen- fuality, which the principles of a fmful and contrite heart impofe upon the de- fires of a frail and lafcivious nature. The genius of temptation appeared to my afto- nifhed fancy wreftling with the pious partner of my bed; and I was waked from the trance of furprife, by the plain- tive voice of expiring virtue. " Come, let us take our fill of love until the morning, let us folace ourfelves with loves." And after a fhort paufe my afto- nifhed ears, Mr. Speaker, were affailed by this wanton madrigal; - * May this warm night, Sir Richard, be Omen of grateful blifs to me, Thou folace of my life ! For ah ! how poorly dreams difcharge, The duties due to both at large, Your country and your wife. As "'. f ;. ( 44 ) As foon as the hubbub and laughter, which this trait of Shropshire purity had had occafioned, were over, the Honour- able Baronet faid, "this wonderful re- monftrance, Sir, though unreal end vifi- onary, induced me inftantly to difcharge one of the duties and I feel, I afTure the Houfe, fcarce an inferior degree of fatisfadtion in making this effort, to dif- charge that which remains due to my country and my political purity, by voting with the Right Honourable Gentleman. As foon as Sir Richard Hill had finifh^ ed, Mr. Chamberlain Wilkes rofe to en- gage the attention of the Houfe. " Dreams," faid the Honourable Cham- berlain, " we are told come from Jove j and, were I now a member of the club- rcom of Achilles, or of any of Homer's heroes, and not a member of the Britifli 2 Par- ( 45 ) Parliament, I would be one of the firft here to fubfcribe to the divinations of the pious Baronet. But, Sir, as I am here a member of parliament, and of courfe among my brethren of this life, can come little under the charge of divine grace : as I dream as little as moft men, and as I confefs that my dreams, when of the ladies, are rarely pious or poetical, I mud be allowed, in this place, and thus fituated, to give my vote and deliber- ations without a pretenfion to any mare of preternatural infpiration. Sir, the lan- guage which the Honourable Gentleman has ufed to enforce his moralizing lay may be fcriptural, but I believe gentlemen will hardly deem it parliamentary. No man is more an advocate for the breathings of contrition, and the afpirations of devo- tion, than I am no man more adverfe to the wantonnefs of profufion no man more imprefled with the obligations of decency, ( 46 ) decency, and the fanc~t.ity*of focially mo- ral obligations. Yet, Sir, I confefs I am, on this occafion, impreffed with ideas different from thofe of the Honourable Gentleman, and am ready to meet him, text for text, in fupport of the motion of the Honourable Alderman. On an oc- cafion fimilar, no doubt, to the prefent has that eloquent preacher Ecclefiaftes exclaimed, "Rejoice, O young man! in thy youth, and let thy heart cheer thee in the days of thy youth, and walk in the ways of thy heart, and in the fight of thine eyes, becaufe a man hath no better thing under the fun than to eat, drink, and be merry." To fit filently down amid fuch a clamour of over-righteouf- nefs, and fuch an alarm of fophiftry, would be pardonable if the fophiftry confined itfelf to the playfulnefs of fpe- culation lefs dangerous than ridiculous: , Sir, when fallacy of argument is to (land ( 47 ) ftand in the front of national proceed- ings ; when the force of error is not only to demolim abftract reafoning, but is to fubvert the good fenfe of human con- duct, and finally to triumph over the dignity of this nation; I confefs that, however I may, in endeavouring to oppofe and confute, feel the inefficiency of my abilities, I am convinced that I (hall never have reafon to lament a con- Icientious effort towards the difcharge of the great duties that every man in this country, and more efpecially every mem- ber of parliament, owes his own charac- ter, and the obligations of his conftituents. This is a point, Sir, of that importance in which the habit of filence to which I am allied, both by diffidence and prin* ciple, is to be furmounted -, and I mofi heartily thank the Houfe for their indul- gence to my effort towards a confcien- tious difcharge of my duty in giving my vote, ( 48 ) vote, which I now do, for the motion of the worthy Alderman." The editor of this report was fo un- fortunate as not to be able to procure the written fpeech which the Chamberlain difpatched to the prefs, and which we hear was long, pious, verfatile, and ele- gant. As foon as Mr. Chamberlain was feated, Mr. Courtney arofe, and began by congratulating the Houfe upon that ftream of light, that flood of intellectual efful- gence, which he faid equally, on all mighty and momentous occafions, iflued from the pious and noble baronet; who, like fome winged meffenger, pacing on a meteor from the fkies, at once edified, exhorted, eradiated, and aftonimed ! " He has fo iuminoufly lightened o'er the point in debate," continued Mr. Courtney, " and fo . ' ( 49 ) fo effectually , by his reafoning and elo- quence, thundered away the clouds and thick darknefs which feemed to involve and invelope the Heir Apparent and the throne, the Alderman, the Treafury- bench, and the queftion, that now the true complexion and real pofition of each is palpable as a poft, and plain as a pike- ftaff. Sir, the noble Baronet has dreamt like a fpirit of health againft a goblin d- d : and notwithftanding the worthy and con- fcientious Cham,berlain feems envious of, and hoftile to, this Salopian vifion, and is pleafed to fuppofe it more pious and poetical, than pertinent or parliamentary, in this opinion I muft. differ from him entirely, eflentially, and toto ccelo. For I will, contend and maintain the diametric and direcl: converfe of the affertion, "pugnis et calcibus ungulbus et roftro. And who G will ( 5 ) will have the forehead to deny that this tranfcendent dream of the devout Baro- net is much more fenfible, folid, and fa- tisfactory than the bafelefs fabric of many a vifion, which the right honourable gen- tleman has often reared within thefe walls. Many patriots and heroes, Mr. Speaker, have watched and waked for the common- wealth and their pofterity ; nay, all this did even a Roman goofe perform but what patriot, or what goofe the noblt Baronet only except ed, ever dreamt of fleep- mg either for the folace of the fex, or the good of their country ? Here Mr. Courtney burft forth, as it were by infpiration Sir Richard is a patriot knight, Who dreams fo wife and witty ; He ought to dream both day and night, And dwell in London City. thither O thither fhou'd he once tranflate His family from Salop ; How would he cleanfe affairs of ftate, Beyond a dofe of jalap. With texts the worthy Chamberlain, Might cram him to the chin, And from his partner, might and main, Expel the man of fin. That Imp who on his pious head, Eflay'd a lew'd incifion ; To blemifh Lady Hill in bed, A devil of a vifion ! Of Mr. P -y's fpeech we fhall not attempt a report; it was fervently de- livered in favor of the motion, but the unexpected, and fomewhat extraordinary fpeech which Mr. S t thought fit to make for the firft time, induces us to contract, or be quite filent on the fpeeches of feveral other hon. mem- bers, Mr. Marfham, Sir Francis Baflet f and Lord Mulgrave. Mr. S began G 2 a fpeech a fpeech of confiderable length in a very grave and folemn tone of voice, by obferving, that he had had the honour of a feat in Parliament for 27 years, and not once during that period, had he ever trefpafled on the time or patience of the Houfe, or prefumed to offer his opinion upon any, even the moft im- portant occafian. His filence had pro- ceeded as much, perhaps, from a fenfe of propriety, as from any remarkable \vant of abilities. He had always thought there had been orators enough, and too many pretenders to oratory, who wearied and difgraced the houfe, and whofe vain effufions, bad even when corrected by fome reporter of debates, and when delivered contemptible, ferved but to fill the vacant columns of a daily paper, He never had the vanity to fuppofe he was one of that clafs, whole abi- lities ( 53 ) s lities would demand attention, or that ; he was poflefied of talents which it would be an injuftice to his country to conceal ; and to rife and make an empty harangue merely that he might be intitled to fend his fpeech to a printer he deemed beneath him. It had always been, faid Mr. S , his practice to liften with the utmoft at- tention to every debate on fubjedls of real moment, and when he had improved his judgment by the fuperior knowledge of others, and difcovered truth from the lights ftruck out by the claming of oppofing parties, he, in iilence, gave a vote, directed by the dictates of an ho- neft heart, unbiased by prejudice or party his constituents, he could proudly declare, approved his conducl. If, con- tinued the hon. member, he was not blefTed with that fuperior endowment of ( 54 ) of the mind which can decide on the moft important occafions for itfelf, nei- ther was he fo foolifh as to vote for the worfl meafures when better were pointed out to him. Thus had he fupported indifferently, the meafures both of miniftry and oppofitionj he had oppofed men when he knew them to err, without confidering that they fat on this bench (the hon. member pointed to the Treafury-bench), which difpenfes rewards and honors ; he had on other occafions fupported the fame men though they were on that fide of the houfe, where hope alone the hope of change, fuftained them amid ft po- verty and famine, nay, more, he had braved, in fupport of what he was con- vinced was right, the fcofF, the laugh- ter, the ridicule, he might fay, the con- tempt of all parties, and had given his fingle ( 55 ) fcngle oppofing vote againft the fenti- ments of the whole houfe j in this manner he had performed what he ef- teemed to be the duty of a reprefenta- tive, whofe principles were good, though his abilities were not great, and had obtained neither place nor penfion for himfelf, his friends, or relations. He hoped the Houfe would excufe his dwel- ling thus long upon the fubject of him- felf ; what he had taken the liberty to premife proceeded from no vanity, nor a wifh to infult others, but to imprefs a conviction on their minds, that this his maiden fpeech, would be guided by the fame principle as had directed his filent votes. It was the vafl importance of the fubject that then engaged the attention of the Houfe, and of the whole nation, and its fingular tendency, that forced him to break that prudent filence which ( 56 ) which he thought he fhould ever hav maintained ; and though it was not his lot to be endowed with thofe eminent talents which many gentlemen had dif*- played that night, yet as he fpoke on a fubjedt which demanded little of the arts of oratory, he truited he might expeft their attention. Political know- ledge, faid Mr. S 1, the fcierice of government, the arts of legiflation, were the refult of ftudy, and required talents \rhich every one did not poflefs , but the fentiments of right and wrong were implanted in the breaft of every man, and the mod common understanding was fufficient to difcriminate between vice and virtue, folly and wifdom, infamy and decency. It was this common un- derftanding in a man, in whom neither the famion of the age, rior the cry of a party had deilroyed that fenfe of de- cency, ( 57 ) cency, nor levelled the diftindion be- tween an honourable and reprobate con- dud:, that induced him to declare thus openly, the grounds of the vote he mould that night give, and the reafons of his differing fo widely with the fentiments of fome gentlemen who had fpoken with an enthufiafm worthy of a better caufe. The motion that had been made by the worthy Alderman, and he was forry to fay feconded and fupported by great characters, and great abilities, was, that an addrefs be prefented to his M to order an enquiry into the affairs of the Prince of Wales, and relieve him from his embarraffed fituation. He would allow, he faid, that the reduced revenues of H. R. H. were inferior to his high and exalted rank, and inadequate to the fupport of his proper dignity. But ber fore gentlemen came to a deciiion on H that ( 58 ) that motion would it not be proper, would it not better become the office and dignity of that Houfe to afcertain what title H. R. H. had to their inter- ference, what claims upon their bounty ? if he had any, the motion mould have his hearty aflent, but mould it appear that he had forfeited all title to their extraordinary fervices, all claim to their extraordinary bounty, it would certainly confift with the constitutional dignity of that Houfe, to declare to the world, by adopting the motion of the right hon. gentlemen, their fentiments of his adlions. For his part, he would boldly .declare, and it would be in his opinion, a treachery to his country if he did not that the conduct of H. R. H. met with his moft decided condemnation. He would briefly ftate the grounds of his difapprobation, and the reafons which had |f < 59 ) had influenced his mind in fuch a judgment. The conduct of a P of W , faid Mr. S , is not to be weighed in the fame fcale with that of any other individual fubject in this kingdom. It was not, he faid, more trite than true, that the higheft ftations were thofe, in which folly and vice were the moft blameable, becaufe their effects were more ruinous and dreadful by their diffufion. If a man in private life chofe to plunge into excefTes of every kind, if he wafted his fortune in low and indecent pleafures, if he abandoned every principle of generous pride, and degraded himfelf by familiarities with undeferving inferiors, if he treated with neglect and difdain, thofe to whom he owed his being, and whom he was bound by every tie of nature, and every obligation of decencf to reverence and H 2 obey, ( 60 ) obey, what was this to the public ? it hurt not them. Such a man would be contemptible, but his example was not dangerous ; he fuffered himfelf alone he wafted his eftate was deferted by his companions difinherited by his fa- mily, atoned for the follies of his youth by the fufferings of his age, and perhaps was of fome fervice to fociety by th& force of his example, in deterring others from the path of vice and indecency ; but, faid Mr. S , when the neglect of that duty whkh a man owes to him- felf, extends beyond the fphere of his own mifery, when the greatnefs of hi s example, by giving a fanction to vice, depravei the manners and principles of a country, attacks the very foundations of fociety, and deftroys that happinefs which the prevalence of morality and ?irtuc can alone beftow fuch a man ceafe* ceafes to be an object of contempt alone he becomes odious and dangerous, and his conduct is the proper fubjedt of public animadverlion and inquiry. He might be afked, to what did thefe re- flections tend ? did they apply to a man on whom nature had beftowed every virtue, every grace, every kindly affec- tion, every great and good quality of the head and heart a ftandard of mo- rality, a phenomenon of genius, the ar- biter of wit and elegance, the ornament and delight of human kind ? Thus had he fometimes been reprefented. It might be the proper bufmefs of orators, and at times, perhaps, of party, fo to embellifli vice : it became a plain man to exhibit it in its naked deformity. If there were any vice, which more pecu- liarly than any other rendered a man contemptible in fociety, and miferable to ( 62 ) to bimfelf, which wafted every power of the human frame, deftroyed every faculty of the mind, and deprefled him below the level of his fpecies, it certainly was inebriety. He would ailc Hon. Gentlemen, did they think fuch a cha- ra&er defervingof applaufe, orofcenfure? there could be but one anfwer. What then would they fay of a P , a guardian of the national manners, who gave countenance to fuch a vice by his example, who, in violation of all de- cency was not afhamed to be feen reel- ing through the ftrects of the capital. That this was a truth, he would ap- peal to every waiter of every tavern, who daily faw the H to the C , the man who was at fome future time (and he prayed to God that time might be far diftant) to govern the realm, and be one of the firft among , the the rulers of the earth, in thofe difgrace- ful moments of intemperance and folly. Such a fcene, faid Mr. S , it might be thought was the laft effort of in- decorum but one folly was generally the parent of another, and a greater : the violation of every principle of pro- priety, of all fenfe of dignity was not yet complete, and the riot of a tavern, and the public exhibition of intempe- rance was to be crowned by the infamy of a b 1. Such was the progreffion of vice ; and in thofe fcenes of meretri- cious enjoyment, where the mind was debafed, and the body corrupted, this exalted P had not fcorned to be an aftor. But this, it might be faid, was the error of youth, when the inexpe- rience of what was right, excufed the commiffion of what was wrong. In this laft inftance it might be fo but the ( 64 ) the quid decet, faid Mr. S-~ is not the refult of experience ; but the con- ftituent of honour, and the foul of virtue* Would to God, continued the Hon. Member, there were no room for cenfure ! the fubjedl was delicate the intereft was dear he knew not how to touch upon it but a connexion myfterious . unintelligible reprobated by the people whether with reafon or not he would not pretend to determine and which excited alarms perhaps ground- lefs alarms, for their religion their quiet peace and happinefs a con- nexion imprudent in its formation, illegal in its exiftence and to fuffer it to continue unpublished, or unexplained, is to fhew a contempt of the cry of the nation the opinion of the world. It was a painful tafk, continued Mr. S , to defcend to the detail of the vices ( 65 ) Vices or follies of any man, and mufl be as difgufting to the Houfe as he declared it was to himfelf but if the expofition were hateful, the concealment would be treacherous his fenfe of duty to his country fuperfeded his objections, and he could not fhrink from the tafk- If the Houfe already felt with him upon the queftion, flill more Mr. S faid he believed they would have reafon to cenfure his R. H. for the choice of his companions and his friends. Who were thefe ? the palaces to which his birth had given him admittance fupplied not one the houfes of the nobility were no longer the afylum of a difobedient fon the happy refuge of a deferted P , from thefe houfes he could not collect a friend one hateful caufe had profcribed him from the amity of patriot hearts and he was fain to turn to the refufe of im- I morality, ( 66 ) morality, to find an arm to fupport him through the ftreets. But mould he feek a friend, a friend of the bofom, " where are we" (exclaimed Mr. S > apparently warmed with his fubjeft,) " to find him !" if it were the Right Hon. Gentleman (faid Mr. S , point- ing to Mr. F ) the nation might not be without hope but if a foreigner, a man who was a dishonour to his country and a difgrace to human nature, a rare example of all that was bafe and vicious^ without one good quality of the head or heart, to palliate or excufe his vice : if fuch a man were to be called the friend of the H a 1 of the C , would not its condition be miferable, its fortune without hope of future glory ? The fci- ence, the genius, the wit of fome men caft a veil over their follies, and made us willing to forget them ; but the fenfuality of of this man was rendered more deteftable by its grofsnefs and inelegance. If it were that delufion of a refined tafte of plea- fure, of the eruditi /uxus, which charadte- rifed fome men in that houfe, it might be pardonable, but it was that of an abandoned, brutal debauchee, with- out decency, without elegance, without the manners or the principles of a gentleman. The Hon. Member faid he was forry to be compelled to ufe terms as grofs as the vices they were intended to defcribe, and to cenfure -, but it was una- voidable ; fuch was the character of the perfon he was fpeaking of, that his own countrymen, as remarkable for the polite- nefs and decency of their manners, as for the fervile refpecft they paid to rank and power, never mentioned his name, with- out violating the national chara&eriftic, I 2 and ( 68 ) and attaching the appellation of Black to the title of Much praife had been laviQied upon his . - -, for the elegance of his occupation, for his cultivation of the fine arts, and for the protection he extended to men of genius, but the plaudits of flattery, and the echo of parafites, were not the mirror of truth. One would think, by their report, that every mufe dwelt within the walls of his palace, In his opinion, a P< fhould be fomething more than the arbiter of drefs or famion, the hero of a dance, or the leadej of a concert. Purfuits which might be amiable and laudable in private men would only detract from royalty $ and for his part, he would * The French word PoJi/on, is rather more decent. rather ( 69 ) rather fee a P employed in tho fludy of the laws, the cuftoms, the conftitution of that country he was born to govern, than in producing difcordant notes from a * { viola di gambo." After a variety of other obferva- tions, which it is needlefs (or rather which we are afraid) to report, Mr. S. faid he would no longer trefpafs on the patience of the houfe; he conjured them, if the conduct of the P appeared to them in the fame colours of depravity as it was beheld by his eyes, he would conjure them to declare their cenfure of it, by voting againil the motion of the worthy Alderman j for, faid he, the welfare or mifery of the country might depend on the de- cifion of that night. If his H had forfeited the affection of the people, it was of the higheft confequence that he mould f 7 ) fhould know it. But from whom? Would the fycophants who furrounded him > would fadtion which made an handle of his defects 5 would the good, the virtuous in the rude fince- cerity of Gallic friendmip, whifper this momentous truth in his ear ? No. From that houfe alone would he be informed of it, and the time would come when H. H. would thank him for the cen- fure which tends to reinftate him in the affections of the people. Mr. S. concluded by obferving the part he had taken in the debate of that night, might incur the odium of many, both within and without doors ; every fup- porter of v e, every fcavenger of oppofition would load him with ob- loquy ; he heeded it nothe had lived to fee the day when a fingle vote was no longer ridiculed, nor a Keppel deem- ed ( 7' ) cd the faviour of his country j the time too he hoped would come, when the cenforial office of this houfe mould chaflife the vices of a Mr. Fox inftantly rofe, and proceeded in a fpeech of conliderable length, whofe warmth of language, energy of argu- ment, variety and brilliancy of thought, and fire of delivery we attempt not to follow. Sorry we are, that the limits of memory will commit to the public eye a difplay fo little like the eloquent cfFufions of that great matter of ora- tory, in a caufe in which he feemed infpired by the dignity of truth, the force of conviction, and the feelings of friendfhip. Mr. Fox proceeded fome- what in the following manner : S IR, ( 7* SIR, When I came down to this houfe, i was with the greateft confidence in the merits of the caufe, which I have heard fo ably fupported by my honourable friends. Sir, I expected the oppofition of adminiftration, for I was well convin- ced that the fyftem of error, that has been the rule of their conduct, would on this occafion, not want the confiftency, that denies by obftinacy, all admiffions of truth and conviction. But I did not expect to hear from them, or from any gentlemen, that torrent of grofs abufe, and that cla- mour of calumny -, that perfecution of malice and of mifreprefentation from which it falls to my fhare, in common with other friends of opprefled magnani- mity, to vindicate the character and vir- tues of his R 1 H . The honour- able gentleman, who has jufl fate down, > has ( 73 ) has gone much at large into a variety of points, which I could not have forefeen would this night have been agitated ; which, I neither deemed fubjecl to criti- cifm, nor at all decent objects of its ftric"lures I give the fulleft credit to the fincerity and honefty of the Hon. Gentleman's motives, and though I pro- fefs not to equal his warmth of language, I truft a candid inveftigation of his fpe* culations, and of the novelty of his political ethics will convince us, that warmth, however a proof of fincerity, is not always fo of accuracy, and that the beft intentions, and the moft honeft zeal will hardly compenfate their mifdirec- tion and fubferviency to inhumanity and unmanly deiigns. With an acrimony better fuited to cenfures of the moft flagrant criminality has the Hon. Gen- tleman defcended to the minute fchemes K of ( 74 ) of youthful gratification; and with a fidelity that looks fomewhat like malice, has he fcented out every pathway of amufement or pleafure, that his R H ' ever trod. The extravagance of the P of W is a fubjedlt that de- * mands lefs the liberal tolerance of the man of fentiment andfafhion, than a can- did attention to certain great fadts, in the exiftence of which his R * H is not anfwerable, as they are independent of him. It is true, Sir, that when we compare the income of his R H , with the income of moft of the nobi- lity of this country, we {hall find it greatly fuperior : but in taking a view of the merits of this queftion, we muft place its fubjed matter, in all the relations and fedions, which the peculiar cha- radter of the P of W defcribes. When we draw our eft i mate from the royalty . ( 7S } royalty annexed to the character of his R. H. when we fee his dignity, his fplendor, his magnificence, and the elevated character he bears in the national perfpective, all intimately blended with the dignity, the fplendor, and magni- ficence of this country; when we feel that his rank is a part of the conftitution of the government of England 5 that he is a great political character ; that agreeably to the conftitution of the country, which he is one day to govern, an antedated fpecies of royalty, annexed to his mode of living ; that he has a court I mean that he had a court ! whofe various official deputies are not to be difgraced by the penury of a mean and ignoble accommodation j where we fee and feel this, we mail, Sir, be better enabled to appreciate the relative value of his allowance, with the objects K 2 which ( 76 ) which its expenditure embraces. In this difcufiion it will be neceflary to foriake the narrow pathway in which a private individual treads the *' noifelefs tenor" of ceconomy, and mount our ideas into the higher region of grandeur, in which his R. H. is detlined to move. In the firft inftance, the cottage may be feledted as the object of choice, and the difpofition may indulge itfelf at will and at eafe in its peculiar bent j its accom- modation of mode is an eflential part of the act of existence : it may purfue, within its narrow and unobferved fphere of action, all the various humours that diverfify hu* manfociety and deportment in the elegance of a proportionate expenditure, or in the retirement of a fullen feclufion $ but a P. of W. is bound in a (kftiny of gran^ deur, which, as it is not an object of choice, fo peither can its neceflary re^ latioris ( 77 ) lations be the fubject of cenfure. We fhould be at a lofs to diicover the fource of fo much honeft error, as the Hon. Gentleman has difplayed to-night, did \ve not reflect that he, with many other country Gentlemen, may have received his impreflions of diffipation and extra- vagance poflibly in a fcene . of academic abridgement, or in the feverer fchool of domeftic restriction. A mind long habituated to the routine of rural (Economics, which, from a ftate of infancy, the practice of near and valued relatives may have endeared ; accuftomed in the retirement of provincial regularity, to fcan with a fcrutiny rather accurate than enlarged, the various fcenes of famionable life to which it is a ftranger ; and to meafure th e degrees of enjoy- ment rather by the cheapnefs and faci- lity with which they may be attained, th a.n than by the elegance with which they may be difplayed. Such a mind, Sir, under thefe impreffions, and this dif- cipline, might ftartle at expences to royal magnificence, to which it had been unufed, or which, when made the object of contemplation, were at the fame time the fubjecl: of its lamentations. Such a mind would be led to eftimate the meafure of expenditure by the fcale of neceffity, and, from its own fubdued afpirations after grandeur, be cynically prone to ftamp as extravagant whatever gratifications its own tafte had not clafled among the luxuries of life. It would miftake the decorations of tafte for the caprice of idlenefs, and draw its eftimate of an enlarged generofity, from the value it had been accuftomed to affix to the wantonnefs of profufion. In order to form a juft idea of men and ( 79 ) and their condudt, it is candid, it is com- mon juftice to view them as adting re- latively to their peculiar fituation. View his R. H. under this impreffion, try his conduct as to his expences, by the obli- gations refulting from his fituation, and I will be bold to aflert, that however fome years of his expenditure may have exceeded his income, the excefs was oc- cafioned more by the generofity incident to a young mind of the moft ample en- dowments and moft fplendid expecta- tions ; by an inexperience that is exclu- fively the companion of unfufpecling magnanimity, than by a wantonnefs of extravagance, or an abandonment of de- cency. At the time when his R. H. came of age, a large fum muft have been fome- where it ought to have been in his trea- fury arifing from his principality. To this, this, as P of W , he was un- doubtedly intitled. The wifdom of our anceflors deemed a certain degree of mag- nificence neceflary to the heir Ap t of the B Th e. Arguing with great good fenfe from the paffions and feelings of private perfons to thofe of royal per- fonages, they judged rightly, as they felt generoufly, that the tranfition from the fituation of fubjecl:, as P of W to that of Mon h, fhould not form too powerful a contraft in the fituation left and that fucceeded to. They knew that royalty, with all its fafcinating aflemblages of fplendor, power, and influence, would dazzle a mind unac- cuftomed to its rays, and they therefore made the eftablimment of the Heir Ap 1 correfpondent to the dignity pofleiTed, and to the fituation anticipated. I appeal to the knowledge of this Houfe t Houfe, whether the revenues of which I have fpoken, are not deftined by law as 1 - have ftated -, whether they have been , applied agreeably to fuch deftination * and I appeal to their fenfe of juftice, whether they ought not to have been appropriated to the eftablifhment of his R H . They have not been appropriated to his funds. They have been fvvallowed in the vortex of royal mortmain 5 they have been diverted from that channel in which they would have nourifhed the virtues of generofity, cha- rity, and a bountiful munificence, to fwell the tide, already too powerful, that overflows the banks of r 1 influence. Here, Sir, I make no plea to the gene- rofity of this houfe; but a plea, ju ft, conftitutional, and founded in no refin- ing fentiment, but in the principles of common honefty^and juftice, which give L to ( 82 ) to every one his due : from this ground it is, I dare expect an addition; from this.it is I demand for his R H an indemnification for the abufe of his rights. When I take a view of the reafons and progrefs of that fuppofed extravagance which has been fo animatedly handled this night, and fo glaringly held for- ward to countenance, a breach of jufticc, difgraceful to Ad n ; I confefs I am at a lofs whether moft to admire and ap- plaud that very conduct fo warmly ftig- matized, or to wonder at the blindnefs and malice of thofe who cenfure it. The anticipation of the revenues of his R H , is a fubject that calls for the mofl open difcuffion ; and the acceffion to certain political tenets, is involved in it, that I never expected would meet the ninds of gentlemen on that fide of the houf ( 83 ) houfe. It involves in its reafons and caufes fome great traits of political defign which when clofely viewed and purfued in their confequences, will, I truft, be not the objects of prefent pleafure and eulogium only, but furnifh a profpect of His R. H.'s character that will one day be the theme of national exultation. It has been the fate of moft of the K gs of England to receive their education ex- tremely behind the curtain of human life. In a ftate of almoft monaftically reclufe grandeur they have remained unacquainted with mankind. It is little to be won- dered at that fuch frequent inftances ihould occur in our hiftory of their abufe of the rights among which they had never actively mingled; and that the temper and political mind of the S - n ftiQuld receive certain impreffions unfriendly to freedom and incorrigible by experience. L 2 The The education of his R. H. is as new in its plan as it will be found falutary in its effects on its future political life. In its more advanced ftage it was conducted, not on the principles of whofe operations an unacquaintance with life and men was a natural cbnfequence. Not {hut up within that repulfive and fallen dignity of ftate and feclufion that eft ranges the monarch from the man, and which, by keeping him igno- rant of others, deprives him of himfelf, we have feen his Royal H. mingle a cultiva- tion of the philofophy of human manners with the ideas and purfuits of his exalted ftation. " Felices illos quorum Jides et induf- tria non per internuntios et interpretes, fed 'ab ipfo, nee auribus, Jed ociilis, probantitr" A degree of popularity, unknown to the education of our princes, was blended with the ancient fyftem, which, when adhered to, was found to be at- tended ( 85 ) tended with a haughtinefs unallied with real dignity, and by an ignorance of men and their rights, that eafily made them the dupes of unconftitutional defigns, and all the baneful influence of an ever to be execrated fecret influence. It has been ufual in this country to keep the H-^ 1 as much from the world as poflible to give him his tutors for his inmates, and it has not feldom happened that the director of his early ftudies has been both unfriendly to the conftitution, and the fecret director of machinations againft it. Popularity was looked on as either dangerous to the reigning influence, that with faldb affectation dreaded a di- vifion of r-^-1 fun mine, or derogatory to r 1 dignity. We need not go very far back into a hiftory of the calamities of this country, into a detail of the effects of an influence, ^enormous, fecret, dark, greater greater than the throne itfelf, to prove the effects of an education of the H Ap 1 fatal, when conducted on a a plan of feclufion, of favoritifm, of ig- norance, with the active interefts of this country, And furely I muft be within the conception of gentlemen, when I aflert that this country is not unacquaint- ed with the unconftitutional effects of an education of this fpecies. The good fenfe, the generality, and the magnani- mity of his R H ^-, early taught him to know the dreadful confequences that refult from that feclufion from the friends to his government, from whom alone he was moft likely to derive con- {Htutional habits of thinking. Thefe principles of the mind had in time a pre- maturity, that at an early age led him to a cultivation of that part of the nation which profefled the pureft principles of the the conftitution 5 and an attention to the influence baneful and unconftitutional, which he traced to the incorrigible habits of a contrary education, taught his libe- ral mind, that, however, an abhorrence of the principles of that influence, which he lamented might detach him from the fupporters of them, his happinefs as K g of E gl 4, to which ftation he naturally, though with filial piety looked forward, was to be beft attained by an early cultivation of the principles of ci- vil liberty, and an early habit of friend- fhip with its friends and advocates. Thus difpofed to focial intercourfe- averfe to that fullen confinement in which an ignorance of human nature, and an hoftility to its rights, are mofl eafily united and imbibed, we fee his R H ftep boldly into that great world, which from an innate philan- thropy ( 68 ) thropy he loved, and for which his vir- tues and fplendid accomplishments formed him an illuftrious ornament. On this great theatre a part was deftined him worthy of his ftation ; and we have feen him in all refpe&s, wherein the great virtues of the man, or the munificence of the P could be difplayed, condudt him- felf, as might be expected, with genero- fity, charity, and munificence. It is impoffible for any man to know his R. H. and not recognife the great and the good that diftinguifti the man of famion in his deportment, the man of genius in his talents, and in his nume- rous acts of benevolence, the virtues of generoHty, condefcenfion, and a manly conduct, that {tamps a weight and a dig- nity, independent of rank and title. Whatever is amiable and valuable in temperi r.9 3 temper ; whatever we efteem in the friend, or admire in the companion, will be found to be moft unoftentatioufly and fingularly combined in the character of his R. H. To a progrefs in the arts and in elegant attainment beyond moft or" his age, and eminently diftinguiflied in them; to a tafte that has rendered him among the fafhionable, the arbiter elegantiarum of Europe, the model of grace and hap- pinefs of felecVion ; eliciting the genius of his countrymen in the various difplay of invention in the mechanic arts,- to this ' . > i > his R. H. adds the graces of literature, and the happy endowments of an uncom- mon facility in and intimacy with the languages of Europe. Such is the man on whofe auguft name the tongue of invective has thrown the afperflon of every fpecies of depadation. If the ardor of youth has ever betrayed his R. H. into excefles ; if the prying and critical M eye C 9 eye of active, bufy, hoftile partizans has ever followed him where chaftity would not go, or through a career of youthful en- joyment ; if the cold and phlegmatic fpy and eaves-dropper have detected him in thofe flights of paffion to which they never may have afpired ; and it fhall even be proved before the cenforial court of prudence that in fome moments of un- guarded privacy and relaxation, he has not acled the philofopher, the mifer, and the mifanthrope ; the candid and the ge- nerous, who have hearts to feel and paf- iions to indulge, will fatisfy themfelves with a judgement not more fevere upon the character of his R. H. than that which they would form on any gentleman and man of honor ; and conclude as liberality and candor fuggeft to every enlightened mind, with the proofs of thofe virtues which he has fo eminently difplayed, the excefies [ 9* 3 exceffes of which have this night been his atrocious crimes. But, Sir, the faults of his R. H. as a mere man actuated by a lively tafte for pleafure, are not his only misfortunes, during this procefs, this torture of his character. Thefe find their apology, did they need one in the generoiity of the mind. They are anfwered by the re- trofped of every gentleman's life, and need but a recurrence to the hiftory of every man's progrefs of character, to meet the moft complete refutation. Fear* ful of failing where nature fo powerfully bppofed them, the enemies of his R. H. have gone into a theme of declamation, that they thought applied to the more fundamental duties of moral life, and were the indifpenfable obligations in the relation of fon and father. His R. H. is accufed of acYmg the part of filial dif- M 2 obedience obedience, and of open indecency in his conduct toward his M ty. Sir, this is a favourit topic with fhallow minds, and of fuch as are accuftomed to carry their ideas of political obligation from their own bofoms and fituations into their reafonings on all occafions, and on all fubjecls. This ground is not tenable for a moment when we reflect that his R. H. is to be confidered in this houfe not only in the character of one of the R Fa- mily, and as fon to his M ty, but he is to be viewed as a political character born a member of the Legiflature of this country, and invefted with honors and dignities independent of the C n, and derived from the conftitution. In the character of a Peer he is an indepen- dent member of the Houfe of L ds. As a man he is poflefled of the rneftima- ble and unalienable right to his own opinion and way of thinking. To de- ftroy [ 93 ] ftroy this right would be to violate the common rights of mankind. To cenfure his R. H. for a compliance with his own political principles, is to deftroy the right of private judgement; and is not there- fore the conduct which this houfe, by its decifion to night on this part of the charge, will adopt. I will not take, Sir, upon me to fay how far a P. of W. might go in oppofition to his R. F.'s po- litical tenets and to his adminiftration ; but I will be bold to affert that the freedom of opinion in an Englimman is his hap- pinefs, and that as a Peer of the realm his R. H. is not to be deprived of this great right, I beg pardon of the Houfe for fitch a trefpafs upon their patience, and with a few obfervations more will conclude. The oppofition of min y to this me2- fure was, what I expected from the known M 3 hoftiiity [ 94 ] hoftility 'of their common deportment to his R. H. The right honourable gen- tleman has affe&ed with his impofing air of principle to fay, that his oppolition on. this occalion, has like the other whimfical Heps of his adminiftration, proceeded on, grounds of patriotifm, and on a reluftance to increafe the burthens of the country. But, though he intrench himfelf within the faftnefs of minifterial refource, and flicker his conduft under the fhield of motives which no penetration can ex- plore, I defy even the chicanery with all its copla fandi that fo eminently mark the powers of the right honourable gentlemen, to prove to the fatisfa&ion of this Houfe how his duty to his country can be impli- cated by the propofed accommodation ; how the happinefs of his country can be affefted by an aft that would refcue from embarrafiment her greateft ornament ; and how the caufe of honefty and virtue can be [ 95 ] be wounded, by doing juftice to that man, who to do juftice to others, with a magna- nimity equalled but in heroic fi&ion, has refigned the fplendour of a Court and th<; patronage of a P e ; who to be juft has been willing for a time to- ceafe to appear great. No, Sir, to the enmity alone, which a difpofition, adverfe to thofe men whom his R, H. condefcends to call his friends, is the (hallow artifice to be imputed. Not all the rhetoric thatfo highly diftinguifhes the right honourable gentleman from every other member of this hdufe, can reconcile a fenfe of duty with a difregard to the profperity of the fecond perfonage in the kingdom. And lamentable is the thought, that the r 4 ear can be poifoned by minifterial fug- geftions, dictated by party picque and party malevolence. Sir, the vote of his R. H. on the India Bill is not forgotten -It is to be revenged. The exercife M 4 of t 96 ] of an ineftimable right when adverfe to min 1 defigns is to be revenged. The fcrutiny bufinefs is to be vifited on the head of his R. H. The benign mind of our moft gracious Sovreign is incapable of harbouring ani- mofities. Of the India Bill it can know but as of an abftraft point. It can know of the fcrutiny, but as an abftracl point, in which its' interference would have been unconstitutional. To adminiftration, Sir, alone muft this oppofition and this cla- mour be afcribed ; and I now warn them againft fuch conduct, as the moft unjuft and unpopular meafure, that a mifguided and infatuated adminiftration ever at- tempted or perpetrated. Mr. Fox here recapitulated his forcible arguments for an addition, in a ftrain of high eulogium on the zeal of the honou- rable [ 97 ] rable Alderman who made the motion 2nd finifiied his fpeech for giving it his hearty fupport. Mr. Sheridan and Mr. Pitt rofe to- gether but Mr. Sheridan faying he had but a few words to fay in anfvver to an honourable Member who fo remarkably fpoke that evening, Mr. Pitt fat down and Mr. Sheridan faid " After the vin- dication, which my right honourable friend has imprefled upon the minds of the Houfe, with all that fervor of eloquence and cordiality which fo peculiarly cha- racterize him, it would feem unneceffary for me to trefpafs upon the indulgence of the Houfe. Gentlemen are naturally impatient to end a difcuffion painful to every good heart, but as the honourable gentleman, whofe criminating imagination and virulence of invective, have been fq completely exhibited and confuted, may gloiify glorify himfelf in the filent neglect of my right honourable friend, on two articles of fuppofed criminality; I am reluctantly forced to trefpafs upon that impatience. I will indulge the honourable gentleman with a word or two, but I (hall not, any more than my right honourable friend, attempt to refute abfurdities. My right honourable friend here regards them too directly with the eye of contempt, to have allowed thofe futile charges to add a fing]e fpark to that indignation, which fo evidently animated his manly, loyal, and 1 may with propriety call it, his friendly vindication. X Sir The intimacy of his R. H. with a certain P e of the B d R 1 of F e, is one of the circumftances, which the terrors of dotage and the illi- berality of fecluded age have thought fit to deprefs into criminality. The imputa- tion [ 99 ] tion is too groundlefs and indecent to fuffer me to obtrude the concerns of an illuftrious foreigner before the domeftic tribunal of a Houfe of Commons, but I truft, the neceffity under which I ftand to vindicate his R. H. from the afperfions of malignity, will juftifjr the prefumption of this attempt. But furely, Sir, when the honourable gentleman thinks fit to difcard the maxims of benevolent con- ftruftion, it might be expected that the imprudence of public inveftigation would have received fome check from the caution of old age. However heinous, in his ef- timation of focial relation, may appear the intercourfe of princely minds, I am perfuaded neither of the R 1 P g s arraigned will accept the fhield of hypo- crify prefented to them by the example of the honourable gentleman himfelf. I can only find an apology for his error in the character of his heart, and in the zeal of of an hypocritical morality. To unravel the intricacies of his accufation, it is only neceflary to trace the progrefs of rurnour ; and all the momentous dread of danger to the ftate and to morality, will be found to arife from the wildnefs of fancy, and the mifconftruction of imbecillity. At the approach of right reafon the vifionary creation will diflblve, and hiftory will record the fact without the deformities of malicious interpretations. Might I prefume to dictate to the mufe of hiftory in this particular, I would recommend a brief furvey of thofe illiberal reftraints which, in the more enlightened ftage of fociety, have been difcarded with all the indignation of generous hearts. The errors of fanaticifm, and that rudenefs of mind, which fucceeded their partial de- ftruclion, muft be fhewn to caft a fhade over improving manners by a barbarity of fentiment, which, forty years ago, was was, with his other poffeffions, the inhe- ritance of the honourable gentleman. The minds of Princes will be feen reciprocally to reflect the luilre of liberal intercourse, and to fmile at the imputations of inhe- rited illiberality, and obftinate dotage. Her report may conclude by reflecting in terms of a juft reproach upon the patience of the Houfe, who have liftened with more than a merited attention to the dreams of pufillanimity, and the enor- mities of malicious interpretation but, I truft, have only liftened with patience, to reject with deteftation. The other article of the honourably gentleman's charge, very properly unno- ticed by my right honourable friend, is a matter of lefs delicacy, as it involves none but domeftic coniiderations ; but to no man acquainted with the laws of his country, as the honourable gentleman is fuppofed J fuppofed to be, could be magnified into a queftion of the fmalleft moment. A Blind impregnated by the confufed ideas of ignorance and timidity, may convert a connection of apparent delicacy and re- finement, into a meteor of unpropitious omen ; but by an attentive perufal of the Aft of Parliament, which regulates the marriages of the Royal Family, when the utter impoffibility of a juft alarm from the connexion alluded to is fully demonftrated, the anxieties of a patriotic mind may be appeafed. But the honour- able gentleman muft allow me to obferve to him, that the intrufion he has thought proper to make, by this public enquiry into the amufements of his R. H. is a mark of difrefpect that cannot be authorized by the rumours of illiberal whifperings, or the timid fnggeftions of extrafenatorial zeal. If [ I0 3 ] . If the honourable gentleman will per- mit me to prefent him with a folution of what is deemed myfterious and formida- ble in this connection, I will not fuppofe himfelf an inftance of caducity which fometimes miftakes wantonnefs of thought for vigour of conftitution ; and that the illufive ftimulus of a difeafed imagination had hurried him into one of thofe haunts of debauchery, he has fo accurately exhi- bited, and to which even age is not fel- dom feen fhamelefsly to refort. No, Sir, I will neither flatter the h gentleman by imputing to him, fo tranfitory and imperfect an incentive to gratification, nor infult the dignity of truth and fenti- ment by drawing fuch a parallel. But a parallel does prelent itfelf to my rnind, and it (hall be a leflbn of charity to the honourable gentleman. He will allow me to fuppofe that in the neighbourhood of his Effex manfion, fome widow of pow- erful [ 104 ] erful attractions refided that under her hofpitable roof he had found a (belter from the peltings of a pitilefs ftorm that from the adventure of that day a friendship had commenced which happily diverted him from the more hateful purfuits of petulant age, and gave that repofe to his mind,- and that elegant diverfion to its purfuits which by fixing his own felicity, render- ed him the more amiable to his friends. Let the honourable gentleman fancy him- felf become fuddenly the object at which malevolence takes her aim, and the envcn^ omed dart of malignant fufpicion is let loofe I would then alk him, with what temper of n&ind he would bear the fentence of a neighbour, whofhould diftorta con- nection fanctified by honor and liberality,- into an event ominous of ruin to his friends, and difinherttance to his heir. I will tell the honourable gentleman, that he would not bear it with the magnani* mity J itiity which fmiles at defamation and con- temns the defamer." The reply which Mr. Pitt made was uncommonly concife, and fubftantially as follows. SirAfter the vaft range of argument which gentlemen have allowed their minds to take upon a motion, which is only to be met by the more refpe&ful re- pulfe of iilence, and the ftrong ground of irregularity, and a breach of thofe rules which this Houfe has hitherto fcrupu- loufly obferved in all queftions which in- volve the difcuflions of a dignity fo emi- nent, and of a nature fo private, and de- rogatory to that right of control inherent in the crown over the fubordinate mem- bers of the royal family, I mould think it unneceffary to advert to the terms of the motion? and of the debate, had not N the t 106 t4ie nioft extraordinary fpeech of the ri honourable gentleman rendered my filence liable to a conftrucTion, which I (hould he forry to have imprefled upon the houfer for a fingle moment. The right honour- able gentleman has thought fit to infert in to his arguments in fupport of the mo- tion; of the honourable alderman, coniider- jltions as foreign to it, as they are deriion- ftrative of a mind that has difcarded thofe notions of decency, By \vhich the good in- telligence of mankind is upheld, and which ought moft particularly to fway, \vhefe t'hei difmiirvon tends to degrade the eminent ftation of the royal perfonage, whofe i-nterells are intended to be afferted. To that royal pcrfonage I am ever folicit- ous to pfefer my moft fervent teftimonies of refbecl^ but I hold in abhorrence thofe rduiations of flattery, which tend only to degrade the idol they would exalt. 1 Jap- prly, his royal mind is not be influenced by C fey the fuggeftions of parafitical followers 5 and I (hall be content to abide by its deter- mination, whether the charges of the right honourable gentleman do not originate more in the illufions of his own miftakea zeal, than in any circumftance attached to my fituation, or my inclination. I am no wife envious of the merit of fervioe which the honourable gentleman may, in the boldnefs of his conjectures, claim by the imputation he would fix upon myfelf, as dictating upon the prefent occasion to the royal breaft. The impertinence and indelicacy of fuch a conduft, may, very likely, ftrike the right honourable gentle- man, as very weak obftacles, and eafily to be overcome. Daring as the honourable alderman accufes my adminiftration to be, and I fhould be loth it were a whit kfs effe&ively fo, it has never undertaken a meafure, either injurious tctthe country ,-or infulting to the crown. To obtrude other N 3 confide rations confederations of a quality fo extremely delicate, and in no wife correfponderit with parliamentary purpofes, is no lefs a mark of indifcretion, than a detraction from that true dignity of his Royal Highnefs, which, when regarded with the eyes of a true refpeft, muft appear fuperior to all encomium. To obey therefore the fug- geftions of that refpeft, with which the motion of the honourable alderman ought to be received, I do, in the moft categorical terms, deny every particle of charge or infinuation, which the right honourable gentleman has felt proper to advance upon the pcca- fion, as involving my fltnation in the op- pofition to it, upon any other grounds, than thofe of informality of proceeding, and difrefpecT: to the crown in the firft in- ftance, and my fenfe of the neceffity, of applying every (hilling of the public reve- nue, to purpofes of public expediency. For 109 For thefe reafons, I am fure, I fhall but prove my due confideration for the necef- Jities of the ftate by fupporting, as I do, Sir, the order of the day. Several mem- bers now rofe, but a general cry of Que- tion, queftion, would not prevail againft Mr. Le Mefurier's very pertinacious ef- forts to be heard and we could juft di- ftinguim in the uproar, that " He la- mented no opportunity had been given to him of delivering his fentiments on a queftion that involved fo important an object. This queftion, Sir involves the moft important fubjeft no lefs, Sir, than^no lefs than no lefs than the happinefs, SirSir, I fay the happinefs and dignity of the h r a t of the c n. I I I am convinced con- vinced, Sir, that every Englishman feels as I do that every Englifhman feels as I do when I aflert that that when I af- fertthat " Here a cough parliamen- tary [ :i 3 tary took place under the moft violent call for the queftion and the gallery being- cleared, we are waiting with impa- tience the momentous rcfult of the dm- fion. 6 2 4 ^ 8 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT LOS ANGELES THE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY This book is JUE on the last date stamped below Form L-9 20ro-l,'41U122> 538 A1N4 Newnham - Anticii of the speeches intended to be spoken In the Hrm g$ of commons* DA 538 A1N4