HERMES TRISMEGISTUS. THE THEOLOGICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL WORKS OF HERMES TRISMEGISTUS, \v CHRISTIAN NEOPLATONIST. TRANSLATED FROM THE ORIGINAL GREEK, WITH PREFACE, NOTES, AND INDICES. BY JOHN DAVID CHAMBERS, M.A., F.S.A., OF ORIEL COLLEGE, OXEORD, RECORUEB^F NEW SARUM. UNIVERSITY) ^ r* * o^ With thrice-great Henns." MILTON'S "II Penseroso. EDINBUEGH: T. & T. CLAEK, 38, GEOEGE STEEET. MDCC(?LXXXII. H g PRINTED BY THE COMMERCIAL PRINTING COMPANY FOR T. & T. CLARK, EDINBURGH. LONDON, . 2, ^ ^/.A3 . HAMILTON, ADAMS, AND CO. DUBLIN, .... GEORGE HERBERT. NEW YORK, . SCRIBNER AND WELFORD. CONTENTS. PAET I. POEMANDRES. CHAP. PAGE I. Poemandres, ...... 1 II. To Asclepius. Catholic Discourse, ... 16 III. Sacred Discourse, . . . . .24 IV. To his own Son Tat. Discourse: The Crater or Monas, ...... 30 V. To his own Son Tat. That the Invisible God is most Manifest, ...... 36 VI. That in The God alone is The Good, and by no means anywhere else, ..... 42 VII. That the greatest evil among men is ignorance of The God, . . . . . .45 VIII. That none of the Entities perish; but mankind erro- neously call the changes destructions and deaths, . 47 IX. Concerning Understanding and Sense, and that in The God only is The Beautiful and The Good, but else- where not at all, ..... 50 X. The Key. To his Son Tat, .... 55 XI. Mind to Hermes, ..... 68 XII. Respecting Common Mind. To Tat, ... 77 XIII. To his Son Tat. On a Mountain. Secret Discourse about Regeneration and Profession of Silence, . 87 Secret Hymnody, . . .93 XIV. To Asclepius. To be rightly wise, . . 96 PART II. EXCERPTS FROM HERMES BY STOB^US. I. Of Truth. From the things to Tat, . . .100 II. Of Death. From Asclepius, .... 104 III. Of God. From the things to Tat, . . 105 CONTENTS. PAGE IV. From Stobseus, Physica, 134, 106 V. Hermes to the Son, . . . . .107 VI. Concerning the Economy of the Universe. Of Hermes from those to Ammon, . . .108 VII. Of Hermes from those ,to Ammon, . . . 109 VIII. Of Hermes from the things to Tat, . . 109 IX. Of Hermes from the things to Tat, . . . Ill X. Of Hermes from that to Tat, . .111 XI. Of Hermes from the things to Ammon, . . 116 XII. Of Hermes from the things to Tat, . . .117 XIII. Of Hermes from those to Ammon, . . . 122 XIV. Of Hermes from those to Ammon to Tat, . . 123 XV. Of Hermes, 125 XVI. Of Hermes, 126 XVII. Of the Same, 127 XVIII. Of the Same, 128 XIX. Of the Same, 129 [As to the Sacred Book.] XX. Of Hermes, 131 XXI. Of Hermes from that to Tat, . . .132 [As to the Decans.] PAET III. NOTICES OF HERMES IN THE FATHERS. I. Justin Martyr, . . . . . .138 II. Tertullian, . . . . . .139 III. Cyprian, ...... 140 IV. Eusebius Pamphilus, . . . . .140 V. Clemens Alexandrinus, .... 141 VI. Firrnianus Lactantius, ..... 141 VII. Arnobius, ...... 148 VIII. Augustine of Hippo, ..... 149 IX. Cyrillus Alexandrinus, .... 149 X. Suidas, ....... 154 INDEX, ........ 156 Addendum to Note 2 on page 9. It is possible also that Hermes may here refer to the traditional " Seven Wise Men " mentioned by Philo Judseus in his Treatise, " Every man virtuous also free," ch. xi., whom he speaks of as then " being very ancient. " ((UNIVERSITY v .^ PREFACE. THE IMercurius or Hermes Trismegistus of legend was a personage, an Egyptian sage or succession of sages, who, since the time of Plato, has been identified with the Thoth (the name of the month September) of that people. This Thoth is the reputed author of the "Kitual of the Dead," or, as styled in Egyptian phraseology, the "Manifes- tation of Light" to the Soul, who through it declared the will of the Gods and the mysterious nature of Divine things to Man. 1 Dr Pietschmann, in his work on Hermes, which exhaustively treats of this subject, 2 gives a list of authorities for these facts, ranging from Plato down to Syncellus, circa A.D. 790. He states, however (p. 33), that by the time that the so-called Hermeneutical writings were collected together, the identity of Hermes with Thoth was forgotten, and Thoth became his son Tat, and Asclepius his disciple, both of whom he instructs in the writings now translated. Subsequently Pietschmann informs us, quot- ing Letronne, 3 that the epithet " Trismegistus " appears first in the second century of the Christian era, and that, before that period, Hermes was designated by the repeti- A 1 tion of the " peyas, ft'eyas, neya; " only, as on the Eosetta Stone. He was considered to be the impersonation of the reli- gion, art, learning, and sacerdotal discipline of the Egyptian priesthood. He was, by several of the Fathers, and, in oi-7 TJ 1 Rawlinson's Egypt, i. 136, and the authorities there quoted. 2 Leipsic, Engelmann, 1875, pp. 31-33. 3 Ibid. p. 35, " Inscription Grecque de Rosette," Letronne, Paris, 1841. viii PREFACE. modern times, by three of his earliest editors, supposed to have existed before the times of Moses, and to have ob- tained the appellation of " Thrice greatest," from his three- fold learning and rank of Philosopher, Priest, and King, 1 and that of "Hermes," or Mercurius, as messenger and authoritative interpreter of divine things. In the Hiero- glyphics he, like Horus, is represented by a bird with a hawk's head, and to him was sacred the Ibis and the Moon. 2 f This Hermes and there was but one among the ancient I Egyptians 3 was worshipped as a god by them. Terfcul- lian 4 says, " In ancient times most authors were supposed to be, I will not say god-like, but actually gods ; as, for instance, the Egyptian Hermes, to whom Plato paid very great deference." / Clement of Alexandria 5 writes, " Hermes of Thebes and Esculapius of Memphis ex vate Deus ; " and he subse- quently gives a detailed account of his works, forty-two in number four of astrology, others of astronomy, geology, and hieroglyphics, and thirty -six of philosophy, hymns to God, religious ceremonies, and sacerdotal discipline. 6 Lactantius 7 expresses himself thus (quoting Cicero, "De Natura Deorum," Lib. iii.) : " Although a man, he was of great antiquity, and built Hermopolis, and is there wor- shipped as well as at Pheneus. He was most fully imbued with every kind of learning, so that the knowledge of many subjects and arts acquired for him the name of ' 1 See the edition of the works of Hermes by Frangois de Foix, Comte de Candalle, assisted by the younger Scaliger. 2 Champollion the younger (" Pantheon Egyptien"). Several hiero- glyphical representations of him, under various Egyptian names, are given by Pietschmann, p. 1. 3 See Pietschmann, ibid. pp. 35, 36. 4 " De Anima," ch. 2. 6 Stromata, I., ch. 21, p. 389, Oxford Edition, Lib. vi., ch. 4, p. 757. 6 The " Kitual of the Dead," vulgarly attributed to Hermes, as at present discovered, consists of three Books redivided into 23 portions and about 165 chapters. See Eawlinson's Egypt, i. 138. 7 Lib. i., ch. 6. PREFACE. ix Trismegistus." Further, S. Augustine 1 relates, "He, the fifth Mercury (as Lactantius had thought also), and his friend Esculapius (or Asclepius, grandson of the first) were men, and became gods, Mercurius and ^Esculapius, after the Greek fashion." Cyril of Alexandria (" Contr. Julian.," i. 30a, circa 412), speaks of Hermes in general thus: " This Hermes then, him of Egypt, although being initia- tor (reXsffrfo), and having presided at the fanes of idols, is always found mindful of the things of Moses, l&c.; and made mention of him in his own writings, which, being composed for the Athenians, are called ' Hermaica,' fifteen books." And subsequently, " I speak of Hermes, him having sojourned, third, in Egypt " (Lib. v., 1762>). 2 The majority of the Fathers, in their uncritical mode, j even Lactantius himself, confounded the original Hermes with our author, in the same way that they ascribed to the Sybilline verses a far too high antiquity;, and the later Fathers, moreover, especially Lactantius, made no distinc- tion between the genuine works of our Hermes and others which falsely bear his name; some of them, as, for in-* stance, " Asclepius," having been written at least a century later ; and those, as, for instance, " The Sacred Book " and the Dialogue between Isis and Horus (Stobseus, " Physica,' 928, 1070, edit. Meineke, i. 281, 342), to which it is impos- sible to assign a date, are all indiscriminately ascribed to the same Hermes, although it is absolutely certain that the author of " Poemandres " never can have written them. What is strange is, that several of the learned editors of the works of our Hermes consider him to have lived before Moses. Vergicius, in his preface to the edition printed at Paris by Turnebus in 1554, states this. Flussas (1574), after discussion, leaves the question as to his age undeter- mined; but Patricius (Patrizzi), in his "Nova de Universis Philosophia," printed at Ferrara in 1591, and at Venice 1 " City of God," viii. 23, 26. 2 See the extracts from Cyril of Alexandria, post, Part III., and the note from Pietschmann there. I x PREFACE. 1593, says that Hermes lived some time before Moses, and quotes Eusebius in his " Chronicle " as stating that Cath or Tat his son flourished in the first year of Armeus, king of Egypt, which was twenty years before the death of Moses. On the other hand, John Albert Fabricius, the learned author of the " Bibliotheca Grseca " (published 1705-1728), has relegated all the " Hermaica," in his " Historia Literaria," to the later times of Jamblichus and r Porphyry. Even Pietschmann, whose dissertation has ^ been already mentioned, makes no distinction between ( the legendary Hermes and the author of " Poemandres." Notwithstanding these opinions, it is certain that the Hermes who was the author of the works here translated must, as Causabon and later writers (such as L. Menard, who thinks he was probably contemporaneous with St. John) have shown, have been a Greek living at Alexandria, subsequently to Philo Judseus and Josephus, in the end of the first and beginning of the second century; who, it would seem, assumed the name of Hermes in order to give greater weight to his teaching. The Fathers above quoted, Lactantius himself, and the editors of Hermes above named, may have been misled as to his great antiquity by the hieroglyphical representations of him; but the facts, then unknown, but now demonstrated, that the use of these characters lasted in Egypt down to the tenth year of Diocletian (he died A.D. 313) at the least, and that, as Henry Brugsch and later investigators have shown, the ordinary writing on papyrus in the National Library at Paris, some of which is entirely in Greek characters, is not earlier than the times of Nero, refute their supposi- I tions. It is, moreover, quite impossible that an author who shows an intimate acquaintance with the phraseology of Plato, with the Hebrew Scriptures as extant in the Septuagint version (sometimes using the very expressions therein contained), who reproduces the language of the Sermon on the Mount and of the Gospel, Epistles, and Eevelation of St. John, and sometimes of St. Paul, can have flourished at so early a period. PREFACE. xi These same facts serve also to indicate his actual epoch. Although, as De Eouge 1 has shown, very early Egyptian monuments now at Berlin and elsewhere express or insinuate the idea of the Eternal Father- Creator, and of his Son begotten before the worlds, yet the dogma of the Holy Trinity is, as we shall find, expressed in far more categorical terms, and almost in the very words of St. John, by our Hermes in his " Poem- andres;" so also the doctrine of Baptism and the Begenera- tion or new birth, as set forth by St. John in the third chapter of his Gospel, as due to The Man, the only Son of God. Asclepius was said to be the grandson of Hermes, and the work which bears that name refers unmistakably to times near to those of Constantine, when the ancient reli- gion of Egypt was tottering to its fall. Moreover, that author refers therein repeatedly to Ammonius Saccas, who is called the founder of the Xeoplatonic School,, and who died circa A.D. 241. On the other hand, the clear refer- ence, by Justin Martyr, to the teaching of Hermes as to the Unity of the Godhead, 2 and the identity, almost verbal, of a passage in that Father with a passage in the " Poern- andres," and the mention of him by Tertullian, demonstrate that he wrote before or contemporaneously with the earlier of these Fathers. Many of the works of our Hermes are probably still entombed in the libraries on the Continent; but those which have come to light, and are now trans- lated, are most remarkable and of very considerable im- portance, since they are the only treatises we possess of the kind belonging to that epoch. The emphatic praise bestowed upon them by the Fathers, from Justin Martyr 3 downwards, ought to commend them to our notice. The eulogium of Lactantius, 4 " Trismegistus who, I know not how, investigated almost all truth;" and as he and Cyril 1 Etude sur le Rituel Funeraire des Egyptiens," " Revue Archec- logique," 1860, p. 357 ; and see Rawlinson's Egypt, i. 320. 2 See Part III., post. 3 See Part III., post. 4 " Divin. Instit.," iv. 9. xii PREFACE. of Alexandria x and Suidas 2 remark, his enunciation of the doctrine of the Incarnation of the Son of God for the re- generation of man, 3 and of the Holy Trinity in Unity, 4 of the immortality of the soul of man, is plain; whilst his undoubted adherence to much of the philosophy of Plato (the Attic Moses), especially in the " Timseus," entitles him to be considered the real founder of Neoplatonism in the best and most Christian sense. The former editors of Hermes were of like opinion. Thus Vergicius, in his preface to the edition of Turnebus (Paris, 1554), " His teaching appears to be most excellent and evangelical." " Behold in his theology how wonder- fully and evangelically he hath plainly instructed us as to the Most Holy Trinity." So also Flussas, with Scaliger the younger (Bordeaux, 1574), "He deserves the name of an evangelical philosopher, for he first expounded the chief effects of divine grace upon man, and first declared how his salvation depended upon the Son of God the one Man given for the regeneration of mankind." So Patricius also, in his "Nova de Universis Philosophia" (Ferrara, 1591; Venice, 1593), which comprised the principal works of Hermes, speaks thus, " In these books and fragments of Hermes will appear a philosophy pious towards God and, in most respects, consonant to the dogmas of faith. It will appear also that all the Greek philosophies, Pytha- gorean and Platonic in divine things and the dogmas of morals, those of Aristotle and of the Stoics in physics and medicine, were all taken from these his books and from those which have perished." But although this may be so, the reader must be forewarned that he will not find in these writings a complete Christianity. There is no express notice of the Nativity, of the Crucifixion, Eesurrection, or Ascension, or coming of Christ to Judgment, to be found therein, although there is also nothing inconsistent^ with 1 " Contra. Jul.," 33c. 2 Lexicon, voce " Hermes." 3 "Poemandres," ch. xiii. 4. 4 Ibid., passim; and see Suidse Lexicon, voce " Hermes," for a passage to this effect not now extant elsewhere. PREFACE. xiii these facts. On the other hand, as has been already seen, they teach emphatically the Unity of the Godhead, the dogma of the Holy Trinity God the Father, the Word, the Son begotten of Him before the worlds, of the Holy Spirit proceeding from the Father through the Son, in- strumental in creation, and the Sanctifier; and there are clear allusions to the effusion of this Holy Spirit on the World, with its Seven Gifts in the shape of Fire. Thus Hermes was not a mere Platonist propounding ] the means of attaining moral and intellectual perfection without reference to the facts and doctrines of Holy ; Scripture, but, in theory at least, in great part a Christian. The "Hermaica" have been unaccountably neglected in England. That these works were not unknown here in the time of Milton is proved by his words from "II Penseroso," "With thrice-great Hermes:" but they received little further attention in this country. On the Continent, however, as soon as the originals of his principal treatises was dis- covered, the value of them was perceived, and immediately after the invention of printing they were committed to the press. The " Poemandres," the principal work, was translated into Latin and published by Marsilius Ficinus at Treviso in 1471, divided into fourteen chapters, which were after- wards increased to twenty by Patricius. This edition of Ficinus was several times republished; at Ferrara and Venice in 1472 ; at Mayence in 1503 ; and especially at Cracow, but in a Latin translation only, by the Carmelite Eosselli, in six volumes folio, in 1584, with a commentary so voluminous, discursive, and argumentative that it is nearly useless. Nevertheless, this was reprinted, with what professed to be the original Greek, at Cologne, in 1638, in one volume folio. The original Greek of the ; " Poemandres," and of the " Definitions of Asclepius to Ammon the King" (which, we shall see presently, is not a work of our author, but subsequent to his epoch), were first printed and published by Adr. Turnebus, edited, with xiv PREFACE. a preface, by Angelus Vergicius, at Paris, in quarto, in 1554. D. Franciscus Flussas republished the "Poem- andres" in Greek and Latin, in quarto, at Bordeaux in 1574. Francis Patricius (Cardinal Patrizzi) reprinted the works attributed to Hermes which are extant in Greek (some of which, as already stated, we shall find are not his) among his " Nova de Universis Philosophia " at Fer- rara, in folio, in 1591; and again under a new title, "Nova de Universis Philosophia libris quinquaginta comprehensa, auctore Francisco Patritio," at Venice, in folio, in 1593, Eobertus Meiettus being the printer. Gustave Parthey has done a great service to early Christian literature by publishing at Berlin, in 1854, an entirely new edition of the "Poemandres" in the original Greek, from a MS. of the end of the 13th century, No. 1220 in the National Library at Paris ; others, Nos. 1297, 2007, 2518, of the 16th century, in the same library having, with 1220, been collated by D. Hamm with the edition of Turnebus and that numbered 2518, which had been written by the hand of Angelus Vergicius at Venice. Parthey also consulted another MS. of the 14th century, Plut. Ixxi., No. 33, in quarto, in the Laurentian library at Florence, collated, at the request of Parthey, by Francis de Furia with the Turnebus edition. This publication of G. Parthey is most carefully edited, and accompanied by a close and admirable Latin translation of his own. In the preface he promised an edition of the other remains of Hermes to be found extracted in Stobseus and several of the Fathers, which promise, it is to be lamented, he has not yet performed. There exist several old French translations of the "Her- maica:" one by G. de Preau, published at Paris in 1557; " Two books of Hermes Trismegistus, one ' Of the Power and Wisdom of God,' the other 'Of the Will of God;'" another of the " Poemander," by Foye de Candalle, with a comment, at Bordeaux, 1574; another, by G. Joly and Hub, in folio, at Paris, in 1579, again printed in 1626. A complete translation into modern French of all the works PREFACE. xv attributed to Hermes was published at Paris, by Dr Louis Meuard, in 1866, in quarto, and again in 1868 in small octavo. This translation is by no means literal, often an abbreviation, and sometimes incorrect. It is prefaced by a critical dissertation on the authorship and contents of the Hermetic books respectively, which contains much curious information. This work was crowned by the Academy of Inscriptions and Belles Lettres, but is dis- cursive and not sufficiently discriminative. Nevertheless the conclusions of the writer have often been adopted as correct in the present volume. In 1781 Dietrich Tiedemann, Professor of Philosophy at the University of Marbourg, the author of several works on the philosophies of the Greeks and Egyptians, published at Berlin and Stettin a translation into German of the Poemandres, or Treatise by the Hermes Trismegistus of " God's Might and Wisdom." In 1875, as already stated, Engelmann at Leipsic pub- lished a dissertation on Hermes Trismegistus by Dr Eichard Pietschmann, "after Egyptian, Greek, and Oriental sources," which, however, relates mostly to the legendary Hermes, and not to our author, but which contains a mine of infor- mation on the general subject from a vast variety of authorities, and may be considered introductory to the present volume. At Bologna, 1820, was printed a dissertation on the Hermaica, of which, however, the translator has not been able to obtain a copy. Some others are referred to by Me*nard in the preface to his volume. At 1855-1860 were published at Leipsic the complete works of Stobasus in six volumes, correctly edited by Augustus Meineke as part of the " Bibliotheca Scriptorum Gra3corum et Komanorum Teubneriana," which, in his " Physica et Ethica et Florilegium," contain large Excerpts from Hermes. These constitute almost all we have of his genuine works, beyond the "Poemandres," which we possess entire, and the notices we have of them in the Fathers of the Church. xvi PREFACE. The genuine works of our Hermes now extant and here translated, and presumably belonging to the latter part of the first century and beginning of the second, are 1. The " Poemandres," of which he is by common con- sent the author, which consists mostly of dialogues after the manner of Plato. The first alone bears that name, being a colloquy between that personage who represents "NoDg," or "Mind" the Wisdom and Power and Providence of God, Life, and Light with Hermes himself. The eleventh chapter also contains a dialogue of a similar character. In the remainder Hermes instructs his son Tat and his dis- ciple and grandson Asclepius, and in part mankind gene- rally, in the wonderful Knowledge of God and of the Crea- tion and of Piety, which he had learned from Nofe. 2. Several portions of the books of Hermes and his son Tat, for which we are mainly indebted to the excerpts made by Stobseus in his "Physica," "Ethica," and the " Florilegium." Also fragments of the first book of the "Digressions to Tat," which are quoted in the works of Cyril of Alexandria against Julian ; and some portions of the books of Hermes to the earlier Ammon, which are extracted from that work by Stobaeus in his " Physica," with a few sentences quoted by Lactantius which are not to be found elsewhere. The citations from Hermes con- tained in the Christian Fathers will be found in Part III. Other discourses commonly called " Hermaica," but which are not his, because containing statements and doctrines which are inconsistent with his, and are either of Egyptian and heathenish origin, or savour of the later teaching of Plotinus and Jamblichus, and besides contain evident anachronisms, are therefore not included in this volume, although we find there plagiarisms from the original Hermes and many statements accordant with Christianity. These are : 1. The "Perfect Discourse" (\dyoc, reXziog), which bears the title of Asclepius. The author speaks of Hermes as "my grandfather," and calls Ammon into council pre- sumably that Ammonius Saccas who was the master of PREFACE. xvii Plotinus, and died in Alexandria A.D. 241. Of this, except such of the extracts in Stobaeus and Lactantius as are in Greek, there is only one version extant a Latin transla- tion falsely ascribed to Apuleius (which existed also solely in the time of St Augustine, who cites it in chs. 23 and 26 of Lib. viii. of his "City of God "), and which was published with his works by Aldus in 1521, and Almenhorst at Frankfort in 1621. That this is not from the hand of our Hermes is at once apparent from its contents, which are at variance with his genuine writings. It contains, amongst other things, an eloquent address to the Nile, wherein the author, as a prophet, laments in touching terms the abolition of the ancient national religion of Egypt that holy land and the approaching triumph of Christianity; the devastation of the country and of its sacred shrines, and destruction of the population. He speaks of Isis and Osiris, and of the cult of animals, of Jupiter Plutonius, of thirty 1 - six horoscopes, and of the Pantomorphosis. Further, it contains a distinct defence of the worship of statues of the gods formed by the hands of men, and maintains that it is a great privilege granted by God to men the power of making gods. That Lac- tantius quotes this work more than once as of Hermes himself, and applies his description of the calamities of Egypt as if they were the afflictions to come upon the earth in the last days, 1 is simply a proof of the uncritical judgment of some of the Fathers as to chronology, and sometimes as to exact authorship, which is well known and acknowledged. It is plainly the production of an Alexandrian of the Egyptian religion, who assumed the name and discipleship of, and quoted from, Hermes for his own purposes, and most probably lived some short time before the epoch of Constantine. A second discourse, also found among the "Hermaica," is a portion of that called the " Sacred Book," denominated Ko>j XOO/AOU (Patrit, 276, Stobseus, " Physica," Meineke, L 281), which Patrizzi corrected after Stobseus from a MS. 1 Lactant., Divin. Instit., VII., 18. xviii PREFACE. found at Enclistra, in the island of Cyprus. It is a strange production, being a dialogue between Isis and his son Horus, with Momus, on the creation of the world and of f souls, and of metempsychosis. It is in places Platonic, as \ if citing the Timreus; and it quotes also by name Hermes, and partly the account by him of the Creation in " Poem- andres." Being apparently a summary of the Grseco- Egyptian philosophy, it must be attributed to a Graeco- Egyptian, probably of Alexandria; but it is scarcely Greek at all, and there are few indications of its exact date. In this production Hermes is spoken of in these words : " Hermes, he understanding all things, who also saw the whole of things together, and having seen, considered them, and having considered them was powerful to explain and show them. For what he understood he committed to characters, and having committed them to characters, con- cealed the most part, being silent with wisdom, and speak- ing opportunely, in order that all the duration of the world hereafter should search out these things; and thus having ordered the gods, his brethren, to become his escort, he ascended towards the constellations. But he had for suc- cessor Tat, his son and heir of his science, and shortly after- wards Asclepius, son of Imothes, by the counsel of Pan and Haephsestus, and all those to whom the Almighty Provi- dence reserved an exact knowledge of the things of heaven. Hermes then excused himself to all his sur- roundings for not delivering the entire theory to his sdn, on account of his youth." From this it would appear that the writer of this discourse was posterior to Asclepius, that is, of the middle or end of the third century. A third fragment of importance is usually included among the " Hermaica," and is quoted by Lactantius with a like \ want of critical sagacity. It is denominated the " Defini- tions ("Opoi) of Asclepius to King Ammon." He calls " Hermes my master, who conversed with me often alone or in presence of Tat," and quotes many passages of the " Poemandres." It is written with eloquence. Ammon the king is supposed to be present, and the main portion is PREFACE. xix occupied with the praise of King Ammon and other kings. The whole is alien from the spirit and diction of Hermes himself, and must have been composed many years sub- sequently to the " Poemandres." The theological and philosophical teaching of our Hermes for he was both a theologian and philosopher, may be thus summed up : First and foremost he insists upon the being of The God; an Unconditioned, self-existent Essence, Founder (xrfoag), Maker (vrotqrrii), Creator (dq/uiovpybs), upholder and governor of the Universe at His own mere Will, the One, the Only, the Supreme very Life and Light Itself. He is Almighty (Mevriis), never inert, but ever acting in every part of His creation, pervading and energizing all things by His particular Providence, to which Fate and Necessity are wholly subject. Nothing can subsist or move apart from Him, Who has in Himself all things that have been, are. or shall be. He is the perfection and the sum of The Good, the Beautiful, the Holy, and the True; immaterial, infinite, incorporeal, invisible, the object of none of the senses; ineffable, incomprehensible, inimitable, invariable; without form or figure, colourless; Intelligence and Wisdom itself; everlasting, independent of time, the Eternal from eternity; the Light and Life of mankind; Holiness and Goodness itself, and in no sense the author of anything evil or base. If any evil exist in creation, it is as it were by way of rust or excrescence only, and cannot be attributed to the Deity. This Being, above all, in all, and about all, is Unity. The universal Harmony of the KoV/Aos, which is eloquently set forth, demonstrates that He can be but One. Motion exists throughout all the order of the worlds, and is the condition and quality of the Eternal; but this Motion must be generated and continually energized by some Being superior to and stronger than that which is moved, and than the medium in which the motion takes place. If He ever ceased to energize, He would be no xx PREFACE. longer God; but this never can be. He is inexpressible, and has no name. A name implies an elder or superior to give the name; but there is none such. We call Him Father and Master and Lord of all existences, not as names, but appellations derived from His benefits and His works. This, The God before the moist Nature which appeared out of darkness, begat the Perfect Word, coessential (' Opoouff/bi) with Himself, the Second God, visible and sensible, First One and only, and loved Him as His own Son a sacred, ineffable, and shining Word, exceeding all the ability of men to declare Son of God The One Man by the Will of God, through Whom is access in prayer to The Father, The Lord of all things. Through this Word were the World, the Heaven, the Stars, the Earth, Mankind, and all the living existences in them, brought into being, and harmoniously ordered through the operation of Mind ("NoDj"), the Wisdom of God, the God of Fire and Spirit proceeding from God, Which with the Seven administrative Spirits created by it, whose administration constitutes Fate, applied themselves to the conformation of the Universe out of chaos, according to the Idea, the Archetype or Pattern, pre-existent in the Mind of the Deity. This "Kotos'" so created, Hermes calls second God, as being wholly instinct with The One Divinity. He gives the same appellation to the Sun, for the same reason and because it is the instrument of God's Will in new creating. The mode of the creation is shown in the form of a Vision displayed before Hermes, and in several portions is related in the very words of the Septuagint version of Genesis. The Procession of the Holy Spirit and His instrumentality in Creation is enun- ciated, apparently according to the creed of the orthodox Greeks. Thus, The God created Man after the image of Himself, as His child, an immortal and divine animal, out of two natures, the immortal and mortal, between the two, that viewing all things he may admire them and then- wonderful order and harmony. Man has a divine nature, PREFACE. xxi because he has a Soul, an independent incorporeal im- mortal energizing intelligent Essence, which, being a portion of the Soul with which God animated the Universe, was created before the body, and was infused into it. It is threefold Mind or Eeason, Desire, and Spirit, which can receive God, and become a consort of Deity, having intellect and speech immortal pro- perties, that Man may contemplate and worship his Creator. The greatest disease of the Soul is ungodliness and ignorance of God. Man, being an imperfect, fallible, and composite being, cannot know The God of himself; but those to whom The God of His own free will imparts this faculty can do so. He is ever desirous and willing to be known; and to those who are pure, and who wish for this knowledge, He reveals Himself by imparting to them of His Mind, which is of the very essence of the Divinity, and joined to it as the light is to the Sun. Not that Mind is God; but that The God is the cause of Mind. This Mind in men is God. Such men therefore have their humanity near to Deity, for He is their very Father; when they leave the body, they become this Mind. They must seek the knowledge of Him, which is virtue, temperance, piety, salvation, and ascent to Heaven. The God created all things perfect. Man has become depraved; but has free choice of good and evil. To attain this state, then, men must hate and mortify the flesh, its vices and excesses, reject the depravity and ignorance of earth, where Truth does not exist; the wickedness, darkness, and corruption of the body; they must recur and look in heart to Him, Who can alone show the way of salvation. The mode of accomplishing this, which can only be done by the help of God, Who is willing to reveal Himself to all, is by ridding themselves of the twelve principal vices, and acquiring in their place the ten cardinal virtues. When these shall be so acquired, man becomes fitted to ascend to the Ogdoad, the eighth Circle, to the presence of God his Father, to become immortal, part of His Essence xxii PREFACE. and of His Powers and Virtues, and divine (&%/). This may happen even in the body, by the gift of God. This is the Eegeneration (fl-aX/yyewstf/a). The author of it is the enlightening Word of God the One Man by the will of God. Baptism is to be added, and His good Spirit must lead men thereto: those thus regenerate will strive to bring all mankind to the same blessed state. Neither any evil, nor has Fate, any power over those who are thus pious and regenerate. They are rewarded with immortality both of soul and body, becoming partakers of Divinity, having attained The Supreme Good. In death the union of soul and body is dissolved, but the Soul survives. There can be no destruction of what is of God and in God. From the perishing body (which is not a destruction, but a dissolution of the union in order to be renovated) a new body arises, and becomes immortal through the immortal Soul. This cannot wholly be attained in the present life; but, after death, the Man, becoming entirely in harmony with God, employs himself beyond the eighth or perfect zone in hymns of happine&lv,. and praise. Those who adhere to the body, and surrender themselves to its passions, are abandoned by God; they attain not unto The Good, or to immortality, but becoming more and more wicked they are given over for vengeance to the evil demon, tormented by wicked demons and fire; retrograding to reptilism, they are given over to be tormented by evil passions and lusts, and, condemned to misery, are whirled about the universe are converted into devils. No allusion is however made by Hermes to the Egyptian judgment by Osiris, or to that by Christ taught in the New Testa- ment. Finally, the great end of Man is, when thus purified and regenerated, to worship His Creator in His presence, and to be united to Him, and to contemplate and adore Him in holy Silence. In the " Poemandres " are three several anthems of praise and blessing "verbal rational PREFACE. xxiii sacrifices " addressed to the Deity; one of them denomi- nated "The Hymn of the Kegeneration " to The God "whose only passion is to be The Good." There is a certain likeness in these to the ancient Egyptian hymns to Ea, to Hades, and Osiris, and to the Litany of Ea translated and published in the "Eecords of the Past;" but a much greater resemblance to several of the Psalms. Thus does Hermes inculcate or imply several of the main doctrines and objects of Christianity; but it is fair to admit that, as before observed, he does not notice the fact of the Nativity upon earth, or the Crucifixion, Death, Eesurrection, or Ascension of Christ, or His Coming to Judgment. Perhaps they did not come within the purview of his intention, as neither within that of Paley in his " Natural Theology." The astronomical teaching of Hermes is merely inci- dental to the rest, and is simple enough. The whole Universe is in the form of a sphere. Nature is composed of four Elements Earth, Air, Fire, and Water. He appears also to have inferred the rotundity of the Earth fr^-. j that of the Sun, Moon, and Planets the latter perhaps revolving round the Sun, but the whole cosmical system round the Earth in an organized Harmony of one external, of seven inner, circles; the varying motion of the Planets being accounted for by a resisting medium. He was aware of the difference between the revolutions of Venus and Mercury and those of the other planets, but does not account for it. He asserts plainly enough that the Earth itself is stable and immoveable ; the Constellations, especi- ally the Zodiac, fixed in a solid Firmament, circulating round the Earth also, diagonally to the Equatorial Circle and the orbits of the planets, with the Polar Star for a central pivot, drawn round it by the COL stellation of the Bear. The whole system of this KoV^oj, or Universe, and of the Harmony thereof, is mainly the same as that of Plato. It is remarkable that Hermes anticipates modern philosophy by insisting that there is no void in nature, and xxiv PREFACE. that none of the works of The God can become extinct or perish, but, if disappearing, are resolved into some other essence or nature, and renovated in another form; thus, it would appear, affirming the future eternity of existing matter, and deducing from this the immortality of the human body. His reasoning resembles that of S. Paul, 1 Cor. xv. 36 : " Thou foolish one, that which thou thyself so west is not quickened except it die," &c. It is, of course, impossible in this volume to contrast the theology and philosophy of our Hermes, with that of Philo Judseus, with which it has many points of resemblance, or with that of the Grecian sages generally; but in the notes several extracts have been given from the Dialogues of Plato (as edited by C. F. Hermann, at Leipsic, in 1877) and from other authors illustrative of the text. Many passages of Holy Scripture from the Septuagint and the Eevised Version of the New Testament have likewise been noted with the same view. Finally, it is desirable to state that the language and style of our Hermes is semi-classical, though Alexandrian, and without dialect; but often rugged, involved, mystical, tauto- logical, and obscure, with a number of technical words belonging to the Greek philosophy which renders it difficult to translate. It bears much resemblance to that of Plato, whose writings he had certainly studied. The aim of the translator has not been to produce a flowing version, or an elegant paraphrase, or a pithy abbreviation, but to render the original into English with as much literal exactness as practicable. UNIVERSITY HERMES TRISMEGISTUS. POEMANDRES. 1 CHAPTEK I. 1. THOUGHT in me (a) becoming on a time concerning the Entities (&), and my meditation (c) having been exceedingly sublimed, and my bodily senses also calmed down(d), like as those oppressed in sleep from satiety, luxury, or fatigue of body, I supposed some one of very great mag- nitude, with indefinite dimension, happening to call out my name, and saying to me, " What wishest thou to hear, and to contemplate ; what, having undej^tgod (e), to learn and toknow?"(/) 2. I say, " Thou, then, who art thou ?" " I, indeed," He says, " am Poemandres, The Mind (g) of The Supreme 1 Power. 2 I know what thou wishest; and I am every- 1 where with thee." 3. I say, " I wish to learn the Entities, and to under- stand the nature of them, and to know The God ; this," I said, " I wish to hear." He says to me again, " Have in thy mind whatsoever things thou wouldest learn, and I will teach thee." (a) li/volets ftoi. (6) ray Smov. (c) ^tvoioi. (d) (e) vo9]?), and movement, and mixture ; for nothing by no means ever is, but always is becoming." " Motion affords that seeming to be and that "becoming. Inactivity (^av-^iet} is the not being, and destruction. Heat and fire producing and preserving all things is of forward course and motion. Living animals are produced by the same. The health of the body is injured by sloth, restored by exercise ; the health of the soul is improved and preserved by learning and care being motions, and acquires knowledge. By inactivity, carelessness, and v want of instruction it learns nothing, and forgets what it may have / learnt. Motion, then, is good both for soul and body ; and Homer teaches that so long as there be the circulation in movement and the sun, all things are, and are preserved with gods and men. But if that stood still, all things would perish, and become, as it were, upside down." 18 HERMES TRISMEGISTUS. Asclepius. Some very great thing, Trismegistus ! 4. Hermes. But of what kind of nature, whether of the opposite, Asclepius ? But to body, opposite nature is the incorporeal. Asclepius. It is confessed. Hermes. Incorporeal then is the place. But the incor- poreal is either Divine or God. But the Divine I now speak of is not the generated but the ingenerate (a). 5. If, then, it be Divine, it is essential (&) ; but if it be God it becomes superessential (c). But otherwise it is intelligible (d) thus. For intelligible is the first God to us, not to Himself, for, the intelligible falls under the under- stander (e) by sense. The God then is not intelligible to Himself; for not being something else than that under- ( stood is He understood by Himself (/). 6. But to us he is something else, and because of this He is intelligible to us. But if the place is intelligible, it is not therefore God but place ; but if also God it is so, not as being place, but as capacious energy (g). But everything moved is not moved in the thing moved, but in the stable, and that moving it therefore is stable. For it is impossible for it to be moved along with it. ^ Asclepius. How then, Trismegistus, are things here moved along with those being moved? for the spheres, I thou saidst, those errants, are moved by the inerrant Qi) sphere. 1 Hermes. This is not, Asclepius, motion together (i), but countermotion ; for they are not moved similarly, but contrary wise to each other ; and the contrariety (k) has the resistance of the motion constant (Z). 7. For the reaction (in) is arrest of progress (n). Where- fore, also, the errant spheres being moved contrary wise to that inerrant by the contrariant opposition, because of (a) TO xyiwiriTOi/. (6) ovviabqe. (c) dvovaloiarot/. (d) voriTog. (e) ru voovvrt v'Trovt'TrTti. (/) t/ placing them as elements of the Universe." Also, " of these four the existence of the World took each one whole. For He having established it, established it out of all fire, and water, and air, and earth, having left no part of any, nor power without." POEMANDRES. II. 21 expression is evidenced (a), that those things which thou callest full, all these are void of the air, these being nar- rowed of room by other bodies, and not being able to receive the air into their locality. Those things then which thou sayest are void, one must call hollow, not void, for they subsist, and are full of air and spirit (6). 12. Asclepius. The saying is uncontradic table, O Tris- megistus ! The air is body, and this is the body which permeates through all the Entities, and permeating fills all tilings. But the locality then in which the Universe is moved What should we call it ? Hermes. Incorporeal, Asclepius ! Asclepius. The incorporeal then, what is it ? Hermes. Mind and reason (c), whole out of whole (cl), comprehending itself; free from all body, inerrant, im- passible from body, intangible itself, stablished (e) in itself, having capacity (/) for all things, and conservative of the Entities, of which are, as it were, rays, the Good, the Truth, the archetype Light (g\ the archetype of the Soul. 1 Asclepius. The God then, what is He ? Hermes. He subsisting (h) One, not of these things, but being also cause to these things that they are, as well as to all, and to each one of the Entities. 13. Neither hath He left anything over beside (i) that is not (&); for all things are those generate from the Entities, not from those not Entities. Eor things not Entities have not the nature to be able to become to be (7), but that of not being able to become anything ; and again, the Entities have not the nature of never to be (m). 14. Asclepius. Whatever then sayest thou The God to be? Hermes. The God then is not Mind but the cause that (ft) txtfixivtaffoii. (6) TT'siVfAoiTog. (c) (rf) o'Xof | oAoy. (e) SffTag. (/) %apYrrix,o$. ($ on x,ex.~hw, Sept.) And The God divided the light from the darkness " (bftxapiirsv o to$ di/ot^aov^ Sept.) In the margin of the Hebrew and in the Septuagint, " Between the light and between the darkness" (Gen. i. 2-5). See ante, ch. i. 7, and the ! [1 "Timseus" of Plato, 52, 53, for similar statements. 3 It is clear that throughout this treatise by " Gods " is meant the superior Intelligences, whom we know as Principal Angels, respecting whom see below, and ch. i. 9 ante, and note. 4 See post 3, and note -there. POEMANDRES. III. 25 Toeing divided apart 1 by fire, and suspended up to be carried onward (a) by Spirit. 3. But each 2 God by his proper power (6), set for- (a) o%ewdoti. (6) B/ot TVJ; 1 The agency of Fire or Heat is not directly noticed in Holy Scrip- ture ; but it is clear that it must have formed part of the original creation. To this may be referred " He maketh his angels spirits, and his ministers a flame of fire," or " flaming fire " (Psalm civ. 4 ; Heb. i. 7). See a statement similar to that in the text in the " Timseus " of / Plato, 52, 53. The account of the Creation in Genesis proceeds thus : " And The God said, Let there be a firmament (artpiupa, Sept.) in the midst of the water, and let it divide the water from the water (^ix^upi^v dva,- [tkaov vdotros KXI vdotTo?, Sept.); and The God made the firmament, and divided the water which was under the firmament from the water which was above the firmament; and it was so. And The God called the firmament Heaven. . . . And The God said, Let the water under the heaven be gathered together unto one gathering (eig avvotyuy^v fttotv, Sept.), and let the dry land appear. And the water under the heaven was gathered together unto its own gather- ings, and the dry land appeared ; and The God called the dry land Earth ; and the collections (rx avarvpoiTat,, Sept.) of the waters called He Seas " (from the Septuagint in loco). See ante, ch. i. 11, and notes there ; and the extract, Part II., by Sto- bseus, from " The Things to Animon " (Physica, 741 ; Meineke, i. 203). The account of the creation of the Sun, Moon, and Stars in Genesis rims thus (ch. i. 14): "And ('The/ Sept.) God said, Let there be lights ((paarvipsf, Sept.) in the firmament of the Heaven to divide the Day from the Night (' between the Day and between the Night/ Heb. and Sept.), and let them be for signs and for seasons, and for days and for years ; and let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light (oars. Qoiivtiv, Sept.) upon the earth, and it was so." And ('The,' Sept.), God made two great Lights" (rovs St/o (paoil xoiff OJAOIOT'/ITOC., x,otl ^vhov xap-Trfftov- Trofovv Koip-TToy ov TO aTTsp^ot O.VTOV sv CLVTU x.a,ru. ygj/of, Sept.). " And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself after his kind" (Gen. i. 11, 12). " And God said, Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature" ('creeping/ Heb.) "that hath life" ('soul/ Heb.; ' EpirotToc, 4/vxZy &v, Sept.) " and fowl that may fly" (' Let fowl fly 5 Heb.; irsretyec. -Trerofteya, Sept.) " above the earth in the n (' face of the/ Heb.) " open firmament of Heaven. And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth" (^/v^w aau tpTrsrav') " which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind." " And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle " (rsrpxTrolot, Sept.), " and creep- ing thing, and beast of the earth " (fopta 7% yvjs, Sept.) " after his kind. And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle " (jcrquy, Sept.), " and everything that creepeth upon the earth after his kind" (ibid. 12, 13). According to the Timaeus of Plato (77), trees and plants were created,, that man might continue, and animals also. 2 See ch. i. 7, and note there. Dante has appropriated this notion in the " Divina Commedia,"' though the number of circles does not correspond. POEMANDRES. III. 27 in their stellar forms (a)j, being visible with all their signs, and the constellations l were severally enumerated (6), with the Gods in them, and the circumference was wrapped around (c) with air borne onward in a circular course by | Divine Spirit. 2 And they sowed (d) also the generations of (a) reti$ ivxarpois i%eott$. (b) ^nnpt&^6in TOC otarpa,. (c) TSpisihixdYi TO vrtptxvx'hiov. (d) faTrtppoKoyovv. 1 " He telleth the number of the stars, and calleth them all by their names" (Ps. cvii. 4). " He that maketh the seven Stars and Orion" (Ainos v. 8). " He had in his right hand seven Stars" (Rev. i. 16). " The mystery of the seven Stars. The Seven Stars are the Angels of the Seven Churches " (ibid. 20). " He that holdeth the Seven Stars in His right hand " (ibid. ii. 1). " He that hath the Seven Spirits of God and the Seven Stars" (ibid. iii. 1); and see ante and note, ch. i. 9. " And I saw an Angel standing in the Sun " (ibid. xix. 17). The wide-spread belief in the East, that the stars had great influence > on the earth probably arose from the idea that Angels or Divinities resided iti them. Josephus mentions that Berosus attributed to Abraham great knowledge of astrology, in which he instructed the Egyptians. Diodorus speaks of Heliadss (Easterns), who were great astrologers. One of them built Hieropolis, and the Egyptians became great astrologers, and were looked upon as its inventors, and, accord- ing to A. Tatius, the Egyptians taught it to the Chaldaeans. In the dialogue between Hermes and Asclepius (perhaps not a genuine work of Hermes himself), in answer to a question of Asclepius, Hermes is j represented as affirming that the stellar Angels, called Decans, have J very great influence over men. (See Part II. xix., post.} Compare " The Stars in their courses fought against Sisera " (Judg. v. 20, English Version). " From the heaven Stars from the array of them" (I* 7% r%eu$ eivrw) "made war" (g^roA^weu/) "with Sisera" (Sept.). " Canst thou bind the sweet influence of Pleiades " (' The Seven Stars,' Heb.), " or loose the bands of Orion ? Canst thou bring forth Mazzaroth " (' The twelve Signs,' Jerome) " in his season ? or canst thou guide Arcturus with his sons?" (Job xxxviii. 31, 32; see also ibid. ix. 9). The Septuagint differs : " 2yj/jjx? %e Itapov IlAe/aBo?, x.a.1 (Ppif/fiov flpiavo; %uoi%ec$; "H ^toivoi^is Ma^ovpad sv xoupy otvrov, xoci "Ecrvtpov IKI xoftn; airrov oL&s aura" " Hast thou fastened the bond of Pleiades, and hast thou opened the fence of Orion, or wilt thou set open Mazzaroth in his season, and wilt thou bring Hesper to his zenith ? " The Seven Stars are thus enumerated in a verse attributed to Hermes by Stobaeus : *' MJJIJ, Zgyj, "Apns, Hatpin, Kpwo$, "Hx/oj, 'Eppj};." (Physica, 176; Meineke, i. 45). 2 Plato (" Timseus," 37, Hermann's edition, iv. 340) thus writes : ; 28 HERMES TRISMEGISTUS. the men, for knowledge of Divine works, and energizing testimony (a) of nature and multitude of men for the dominion of all things that are under heaven, and the cognition (&) of good things, for to be increased in increase, and to be multiplied in multitude, and every soul in flesh I through course of encircling Gods (c), for contemplation of I Heaven, and course of the heavenly Gods, 1 and divine works and energy of nature, and for signs of good things, (a) Ivspyoixrav ftaprvaioiv. (b) l-Kiyvuaiv. (c) 6tav l^ li From Reason then and this Providence of God for the generation of Time, that Time might be generated, Sun and Moon, and five others denominated Planet Stars, were generated for the division and protection of the numbers of Time. And The God having made bodies of each of them, placed them in the Orbits in which the period of the others went being Seven, the stars being seven. Moon, indeed, in the first around the earth, but Sun in the second above earth, but Hesper and that called sacred of Hermes going in the circle equal in swiftness with the Sun, but having the contrary force to it, whence the Sun and that of Hermes and Hesper both overtake and are overtaken in these by one another. When all the Stars then needed to fabricate Time, had attained the course suitable each to each, -and had become living bodies bound by vital chains, and had learned that ordained to them according to the motion of the diverse being diagonal (a-Aeey/**) and overruled by the same, they revolved, some in -a larger, some in a lesser orbit; those in a lesser orbit revolving faster, but those which had the larger revolving more slowly. That there might be some measure of their relative swiftness in their eight courses, God kindled Light in the second of the orbits, that next the earth, which we call Sun, especially that it might shine over all the heaven, and that living creatures, such to whom it was suitable, might partake of number, learning it from the orbit of this and the like. Thus then became Night and Day, and the period of the one and most intellectual revolution," &c. " There is no difficulty in seeing that the perfect number of Time completes the perfect year, when all the eight periods having their relative degrees of swiftness are accom- plished together, and begin again at their original points of departure." See ante, sec. 2, note 2. 1 The Seven Stars, with their guardian angels (viz., the Sun, the Moon, Venus, Mercury, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn), were by Hermes believed to revolve round the Earth, which remained unmoved in the midst. So also the remainder of the Stars, but these latter fixed in a solid firmament (ampta/aa,, Septuagint). See post, ch. xi. 7, and note. POEMANDRES. ///. 29 for knowledge of Divine power, to know parts (a) of good and evil things, and to discover workmanship (b) of all good things. 4. Their living and becoming wise beginneth according to portion (or degree) (c), of course of encircling Gods, and to be resolved into that ; and there shall be great memorials of artificial works (d) upon the earth, leaving behind in renewal the wasting (e) of times. And every generation of animated flesh (/), and of the fruit of seed, and of all art energy (g) ; those which are diminished, shall be renewed by necessity, and by renewal of Gods, and by course of periodical circle of Nature. For Divine is the whole cos- mical composition (h) renovated by Nature. For in the Divine has Nature also been constituted. 1 (a) f^oipot;, or degrees. (6) B/BXov/>y/ay. (c) poipxv. (d) re^vovpyififAoirtoy. (e) ftoti>paoii>. (/) l^v^v aotpxo;. G/) T%ywp f /tii;. (Ji) 1 The construction of this Chapter is in many parts obscure, and I the text corrupt or incomplete. Plato (" Timaeus," 30), after saying that The God had brought all things out of disorder into order, adds : " For it was not lawful for The Best to work out anything else but the most beautiful." The account of the Creation of Man, and the purposes for which he was created, in the book of Genesis, which it will be instructive to compare with that of Hermes, is as follows : " And God said, Let Us make Man in Our Image, after Our Like- ness : and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. So God created Man in His own image, in the image of God created He him ; male and female created He them. And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it ; and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth (or ' creepeth,' Heb.) on the earth. And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed (' seeding seed,' Heb.), which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed, to you it shall be f6r meat. And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life (' a living soul,' Heb.), I have given every green herb for meat : and it was so. And God saw 30 HERMES TRISMEGISTUS. CHAPTER IV. To Ms own Son Tat. Discourse. The Crater, or Monas. 1. The Creator (a), not with hands but by Word, 1 made(&) the whole World, 2 so that conceive of Him thuswise, as of the present and everbeing, and having made all things, and One and Only and by His own Will having created (c) the Entities. For this is the body of Him ; not touchable, nor (6) ITO/J^SI/ rov "Truuroe, everything that He had made, and, behold, it was very good " (Gen. i. 26-31). The version of the Septuagint is as follows : " Ka/ sJtftv b Qebg 'TToirjaufAtv " AvQpuvov xar l/xova q/Atrspav xa/ 5ta$' opoiuffiv ; xa/ dp^sruffav ruv i^dvuv r^g QahdcGyg xa/ ruv mreivuv rov ovpavov xa/ ruv xryvuv xa/ TaOjj rr t g yr^g xai Travruv ruv IptftTuv TUV zpKOVTUv sft} r^g y?j. Ka/ I-TO/TJO'SV o &sbg rbv xar f/xoi/a &sov svolqffsv avrov, apctv %ai Qq Ka/ zvXoyrjfftv avrovg 6 @tbg X'syuv Av^dvtffQz xa/ fy yw xa} xaraxupiovffars avrqc,, xai ap^trs ruv rq$ QaXdfftfqg xai ruv tfsrsivuv rov bupavov xa/ Tavrwv ruv xa/ tfaffqg rqg yyjg xa/ tfdvrwv ruv spKtrZiv ruv * Ka/ sJrfsv 6 &sbg 'idou dsd 6<7rp/&a o sffriv svdvu tfdffTig rqg yyg, xai ^rav guXo? o s%si sv xapirbv Gtfsp/Aarog G^O^ILOM V/JL/V effrai sjg [Bpuffiv. Ka/ 'Tract roig Qripioig r%g yr^c, xai iraffi ro?c, rttreivoig rov ovpavou xa/ cravr/ sp'TTsriZ sptfovri S fyvy$v fayjg xai -ravra %6prov %Xupbv sig (Spuffiv xa/ sysvsro ourug. Ka/ sJdsv o 0% ra cravra offa eKofyffz xa/ tdov xaXa X/av" (Field's Edition, Cantab. 1665). 1 The Chaldee paraphrast has " Memra." " By the Word of The Lord were the heavens made and all the host of them by the breath of His mouth " (Ps. xxxiii. 6). " He spake and it was done " (ibid. 9). " Through faith we understand that the worlds have been framed by the Word of God" (Heb. xi. 3). " For this they wilfully forget that there were heavens from of old, and an earth compacted out of water and amidst water, by The Word of God " (2 Pet. iii. 5). See also Gen. i. 6 ; John i. 3. 2 The word " xoV^o?" has been uniformly translated " World," but it must be understood to mean the entire cosmical " Ordo," or Universe. * POEMANDRES. IV. 31 visible, nor measurable, nor separable (a), nor like to any other body. For He is neither fire, nor water, nor air, nor Spirit ; but all are from Him ; for being good He willed to dedicate this to Himself alone, and to adorn the earth. 1 2. But as ornament of Divine body, He sent down The Man, immortal animal, mortal animal. And the Man indeed excelled the animals and the world because of the Speech (&) and of the Mind. For the Man became spec- tator of the works of The God, and wondered, and acknow- the Maker. 3. The Speech, then, O Tat ! He hath imparted among all the men but by no means the Mind ; not envying (c) any; for envy cometh not thence, but is conceived (cQ below in the souls of those men who have not the Mind. Tat. Wherefore, then, Father ! has not The God im- parted The Mind to all men ? Hermes. He willed, Child ! this to be stationed (e) in the midst, as it were a prize for the Souls. 4. Tat. And where hath He stationed it ? Hermes. Having filled a great Cup (/), of this He sent down giving a herald (#), and commanded him to proclaim to the hearts of men these things ; Baptize thyself who is able into this the Cup, who is believing that thou shall return to Him who hath sent down the Cup, who is recog- nizing for what thou wast generated (h). As many, then, (c) (/) (a) B/fltoretTov. (6) rov Aoyo"- (c) tyQovuv, grudging. (fZ) avviarotroii. (e) ftpvt (g) loiig zypvxot. (1l) 1 See Plato in Stob. Physica (64 Meineke, i. 16) : " The One, the only natured (^oi/6 cupidity (c) and passion (d), they admire not those things worthy of contemplation, but attaching themselves to the pleasures and appetites of the body, believe that the Man was generated for the sake of these. But as many as have partaken of the gift that is from The God, these, O Tat! according to comparison (e) of the works, are im- mortal instead of mortal, embracing (/) all things in their own Mind, those upon the earth, those in Heaven, and if there is anything above Heaven. So much having elevated themselves, they behold the Good, and having beheld, they have considered their sojourn here as mis- fortune, and having despised all things corporeal and incorporeal, they hasten to The One and Only. 6. This, Tat ! is the science (g) of the Mind, the in- spection (7i) of divine things, and the recognition (i) of The God the Cup being Divine. 2 (a) yftatprov. (6) 0&Xoy6>y. (c) ryv xpxatv (d) opyvj. (e) XMTX wyxptfftit. (/) (g) 6inor9)f&iri. (li) suropfot, looking into. (i) 1 " He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved " (Mark xvi. 16). " Except a man be born anew, he cannot see the kingdom of God " (John iii. 3). " Except a man be born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God " (ibid. 5). 2 Here is enunciated the substance of what has been improperly called " Mysticism " (to be distinguished from Quietism), viz. : " A sacred and secret knowledge of God and of Divine things." Hermes anticipates the sentiments of the Epistles and Homilies of the two Egyptian Macarii. In Homily vi. (Edit. Pritius, 1598), are found these expressions "'O Opovos Tq$ titoryiros o voi>$ yftow katt, x.ai irot'Aiy o Qpoiios rov vw vj 0&rj? tart zal TO ^vlv^cx,? "The throne of the Divinity is the Mind of us ; and again, the throne of the Mind is The Divinity and The Spirit." See post, ch. x. 5, 6, and ch. xiii. POEMANDRES. IV. 33 Tat. I, too, wish to be baptized, J?ather! Hermes. Unless, first, jthou shalt iatej tlie body, 1 O Child! thou canst not love thyself; but having loved thyself thou shalt have Mind, and having the Mind thou shalt obtain also (a) the science. Tat. How sayest thou these things, Father? Hermes. For it is impossible, Child ! to be about ' both about things mortal, namely, and things divine.-! For of Entities there being two, body and bodiless, in) which the mortal and the Divine are understood (&), the choice of one or the other is left to him who wisheth to choose. 2 For it is not possible that both concur; but with whomsoever the selection (c) is left, the one being diminished hath manifested the energy of the other. 7. The choice, then, of the more excellent not only happens most fair to the chooser to deify (d) the Man, but also shows forth the piety towards God ; but that of the inferior hath indeed destroyed the man, but he hath trans- gressed (e) nothing towards God but this only, that like as pageantries (/) pass on in the midst, not able them- selves to energize anything, but are hindering them, in the same way so these make a pageant (g) only in the world, being led away by the bodily pleasures. 8. These things being thus, Tat ! those which are from The God both have belonged to us, and will belong (A); let those from us follow and not lag behind ; for The God is not the cause, but we are the cause of evil things, prefer- ring these to the good. 3 Thou seest, Child ! how many (a) [ttTothij-fyy. (6) vouroii. (c) (d) d.Ko6tuaa,i. (e) \ i 7ch-n[x.(it~h-wtv. (/) (g) KoftTctvovai. (h) v-Trqp^e xott V7ra,p%fi. 1 " This is life eternal, that they should know Thee the only true God "( John xvii. 3). " I buffet my body, and bring it into bondage" (1 Cor. ix. 27). "Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him " (1 John ii. 15). 2 See the Excerpt from Stobseus, Ethica ii. 358, post, Part II. xviii. , 3 " Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God: for C 34 HERMES TRISMEGISTUS. bodies we must pass through, and how many choirs of demons, and continuity and courses of stars, that we may hasten to the One and only God. For The Good is insur- passable, interminable, and endless (a) ; in itself also it is without beginning ; but to us seeming to have as beginning the knowledge (&). The knowledge then does not become a beginning to it, but to us it affords the beginning of that which should be known (c). 9. Let us lay hold of the beginning, and we shall make way with quickness through everything. For it is alto- gether perverse (d) the abandoning things accustomed and present, to revert to those ancient 1 and pristine. For the things appearing delight, but those appearing not cause difficulty in believing. But the evils are more ap- parent, but the good is obscure to the eyes ; for there is neither form nor figure to it. For this reason it is similar to itself, but to all others dissimilar ; for it is impossible for incorporeal to be apparent (e) to body. 10. This is the difference of the like from the unlike,, and to the unlike is the shortcoming to the like (/). 2 : For the Monas (Unit) being beginning (g) and root of all things, is in all things as it were root and beginning ; for without beginning is nothing; but beginning is out of nothing but out of itself, since it is beginning of the others. 3 For it is this (beginning) since there happens not (a) dr&$. (&) r^v yvaaiv. (c) TOV yvaaQyiaoptevov. (d) (e) (poti/qitoif. (y) vffTtpYiftoi ?rpo$ TO OJ&OIQV. (g} ocp^. God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth He any man ; but every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed " (James i. 14, 15). 1 " Forgetting the things which are behind, and stretching forward to the things which are before" (Phil. iii. 13, Eevised Version). 2 This is extracted by Stobseus (Physica, 306 ; Meineke, i. 81). 3 Plato enumerated three dp%Ki or beginnings " The God, The Matter, The Idea: By whom, out of which, to which: But the God is Mind of the world, but the Matter that subject to generation and destruction ; and Idea incorporeal Essence in the intelligences and the phantasies of the God," Stobseus (Physica, 309 ; Meineke, i. 8% POEMANDRES. IV. 35 being other beginning. Monad then being beginning, comprises in it (a) every number, comprised by none ; and it engenders (6) every number engendered by no other number. 11. But everything engendered is imperfect and divis- ible, may be increased and diminished; but to that perfect nothing of these things happens ; and what may be in- creased also is increased by the Monad, but is consumed (c) by its own weakness, when no longer able to receive the Monad. 1 This then to thee, Tat ! as far as possible is described the Image of The God, which if thou contemplatest accu- rately, and shalt understand with the eyes of the heart, believe me, Child ! thou shalt find the way to the things above, or rather, the Image itself will guide thee. For the spectacle hath something peculiar; those who shall attain to the contemplation it detains and attracts, just as they say the magnet-stone the iron. 2 (a) iimpik-tfi. (&) yeyvK. (c) 1 Here is set forth the Pythagorean doctrine. He placed the principles (dpxd$) of all things in numbers and their symmetries, which he calls harmonies, but these composed of both elements (ffTOixHoi). Again, he placed the Monad and the indefinite Duad in these principles. One of these principles he assigns to The creative and eternal Cause, which is Mind The God; but the other to the passive and material, which is the Visible World. " The nature of number is a Decade, for you count up to Ten, and then go back to the Monad ; and of these Ten the power is in the Fours, for it is made up of the Tetrad and of its parts ; and if any one exceeds the Tetrad,. he will fall over out of the Ten." (See Stob., Physica, 300; Meineke,. i. 80). The views of Leibnitz in his "Principia Philosophise and Theodicse," nearly resemble the above. 2 Here may be quoted the noble passage from the Wisdom of Solomon, wherein many of the expressions and ideas closely resemble what has preceded and what follows (ch. vii 16, 17 r 22-29). The English version is this: " For in His hand are both we and our words ; all Wisdom also, and knowledge of workmanship. For He hath given me certain knowledge of the things that are, namely, to know how the world was made, and the operation of the elements, &c. For Wisdom, 36 HERMES TRISMEGISTUS. CHAPTER V. Of Hermes the Trismegistus, to his own Son Tat. That the Invisible God is most Manifest. I ' 1. THIS discourse also, Tat ! I will go through with ' thee, in order that thou mayst not be uninitiate in the Name of The more excellent God; but do thou understand, how that seeming to the many nonapparent, shall become very apparent to thee. For it would not be, if it were non- apparent. For everything apparent is generated (a), for it hath appeared. But the nonapparent always is, for it has no need to appear. For it ever is, and makes all other things apparent. He being nonapparent, as ever being, Himself making manifest (&), is not made manifest ; not Himself generated ; but in imagination (c) imagining all things. 1 For imagination is of the things generated only. For imagination is naught but generation. (a) yevvviTOV. (&) (pctvtpatt. (c) which is the worker of all things, taught me : for in her is an under- standing Spirit, holy, One only, manifold, subtile, lively, clear, un- defiled, plain, not subject to hurt, loving the thing that is good, quick, which cannot be letted, ready to do good ; kind to man, sted- fast, sure, free from care, having all power, overseeing all things, and going through all understanding, pure and most subtile Spirit. For Wisdom is more moving than any motion : she passeth and goeth through all things by reason of her pureness. For She is the breath of the power of God, and a pure influence flowing from the 'Glory of the Almighty : therefore can no defiled thing fall into her. For she is the brightness of the everlasting Light, the unspotted mirror of the power of God, and the Image of his Goodness. And being but one, she can do all things : and remaining in herself, she maketh all things new: and in all ages entering into holy souls, she maketh them friends of God, and prophets. For God loveth none but him that dwelleth with "Wisdom. For she is more beautiful than the Sun, and above all the order of Stars : being compared with the Light she is found before It." The Septuagint has no essential difference. C x Imagination, or Phantasy, seems here to be equivalent to the * " Idea" previously spoken of. POEMANDEES. V. 37 2. But the One ingenerate is plainly both unimagin- able (a) and nonapparent; but imagining (6) all things, He appears through all things and in all things, 1 and especially in those in whom He may have wished to appear. Do thou then, Child, Tat! pray first to the Lord and Father, and Only and One and from Whom the One, to be propitious (c), that thou mayst be able to understand The God so great (d), if that but one ray of Him may shine forth upon that thine understanding. For understanding (e) alone discerns the nonapparent (/) as being itself nonapparent ; if thou art able, it will appear to the eyes of thy mind, O Tat ! for the Lord is without envy (g) ; for He appeareth throughout the whole World. Thou mayst be able to take understanding, to see it, and lay hold of it with thine own hands, and to contemplate the image of The God. But if that within thee is non- apparent to thee, how shall He in Himself through thine eyes appear to thee? 3. If, however, thou wishest to see Him, consider the Sun, consider the course of the Moon, consider the order of the Stars; who is He maintaining this order? 2 for the whole order is determined (h} by number and place. 3 The Sun is the greatest god of the gods in heaven, to whom all the heavenly gods yield as if to a king and dynasty. And this the so vast (i), the greater than earth and sea, sub- (a) ei(pot!>ToifffoiffTo$. (&) QctvTotaiuv. (c) i'Aj^(f). (d) (e) vows (the passage is corrupt). (/) TO xtpavss. (g) ti(povs,' as if upon floors/ Sept.); which maketh Arcturus, Orion (" Earns pov, Sept.), and Pleiades, and the chambers of the South" (Job ix. 7-9). "The Moon and the Stars, which Thou hast ordained" (Ps. viii. 3). "He telleth the number of the Stars; He calleth them all by their names" (Ps. cxlvii. 4). 3 See ante, ch. i. 14, and note there. 38 HERMES TRISMEGISTUS. mits (a), having above itself stars revolving smaller than itself. Whom reverencing or whom fearing, Child? And each of these the Stars being in Heaven, make not alike or equal course. Who is He having defined to each the way and the magnitude of the course ? 4. This Bear (&) which turned about itself, and carrying round along with it the whole World order (c) : who is He having fabricated that organism? Who is He having cast bounds about the Sea? Who He having stablished(d) 1 the Earth? For there is some One, Tat ! the Maker and Lord of all these things. For it is impossible that either place or number or measure be conserved apart from the Maker. 2 For all order (e) cannot be made (/) without place and (a) avt-fctTai. (b) "Apxros. (c) rov 'Troc-vroe, KM/AGP. (d) f^pKffois. (e) rx^ig. ( < / r ) awoiwos. 1 "The Lord made the Sea and all that therein is" (Exod. xx. 11). " The Sea is His and He made it, and His hands formed the dry land" (Ps. xcv. 5). " Thou hast founded the world and its fulness" (Ps. Ixxxix. 11). " The world also shall be established that it shall not be moved " (Ps. xcvi. 10. See also Ps. xxiv. 2, xxxv. 6; Jonah ix. 9; Acts iv. 24, xiv. 15; Kev. x. 6). " Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? Declare, if thou hast understanding. Who hath laid the measures thereof, if thou knowest ? or who hath stretched out the line upon it? Whereupon are the foundations thereof fastened? or who laid the corner-stone thereof? Or who shut up the Sea with doors, when it brake forth as if it had issued out of the womb? and brake up for it my decreed place, and set bars and doors, and said, Hitherto shalt thou come, and no further ; and here shall thy proud waves be stayed?" (Job xxxviii. 4. See Isaiah li. 10). "The Lord which hath placed the land for the bound of the sea, by a perpetual decree that it cannot pass it " (Jer. v. 22, and see Neh. ix. 6). " The Lord possessed me in the beginning of His ways before His works of old," &c., "when He gave to the Sea His decree that the waters should not pass His commandment ; when He appointed the founda- tions of the earth, then I was by Him " (Prov. viii. 22-29). 2 " HoiYrrvjs" Maker, " Creator." In this Hermes rises beyond Plato, whose God may seem to some to be rather a constructor and arranger of material already existing. In his Timaeus he speaks of Fire, Water, Air, and Earth as beginnings or first principles (tip%ei$), and asserts that no one hath ever indicated what was their origin. Yet, in other places, he speaks of The God as POEMANDEES. V. 39 without measure, but without Master (a), neither this, Child ! For if the unordered is defective (b), in that it doth not keep the way of the order, yet it is under a Master, Him having not yet ordained the order to it. 1 5. I wish it were possible for thee becoming winged to fly up into the air, and being lifted up in the midst between the Earth and Heaven to behold the solidity of the Earth and the fluidity of the Sea, the flowings of rivers, the loose- ness of the air, the vehemence of fire, the course of stars, the very swift circling (c) of heaven around these. most fortunate spectacle that, Child ! at one glance to behold all these, the immovable in movement, and the invisible apparent ; by means of which is effected the very order of the World, and this the World of the order. 6. If thou wouldest behold the Creator also through the things mortal, those upon the earth and those in depth, consider, Child! the man fabricated (d) in the belly, and examine accurately the art of the fabricator (e), and learn who it is fabricating this beautiful and divine image of the Man. Who is He having circumscribed (/) the eyes, who He having perforated the nostrils and the ears, who He having opened the mouth, who He having stretched out and bound together the nerves, who He having formed in channels the veins, who He having hardened the bones, who He having cast the skin about the flesh, who He having separated the fingers and the limbs, who He having widened a basis for the feet, who He having opened the pores, who He having extended the spleen, who He having formed the heart pyramidwise, who He having put together the sides, who He having widened the liver, who He having hollowed out (g) the lung, who He having made the stomach (a) aSgWorof. (6) IvBfigj. (c) irspifittwv. (d) (e) TOW B>7a/oy/jy^<7yro?. (/) irepiyptyeis. 1 Plato (Timaeus, 30), " For The God having willed that all things "be good, and nothing according to His might, be bad (), thus taking up everything as much as was seen, not being at rest but moved confusedly and disorderly, brought it into order from this disorder." 40 HERMES TRISMEGISTUS. capacious, who He having fashioned the most honourable parts for being evident, but having concealed the base. 1 7. Behold how many arts of one material! how many works in one circumscription (a), and all exceedingly beautiful and all measured, yet all in difference. Who made all these things ? What mother, what father ? If not alone The invisible God, by The will of Himself having created all things ? 2 8. And a statue indeed or an image apart from a sculptor or painter (6), no one says can become to be (c) ; and hath this creation become to be (d), apart from a creator ? O this much blindness ! this much impiety ! O this much ignorance ! Never ever, Child, Tat ! shouldst thou de- prive the Creator of His creations. Better and superior it is 3 . As much as is according to God in name, so much is He the Father of all things, for He is Only (e), and this is the function for Him to be, Father. 9. But if you compel me to speak something more bold, it is His Essence to be pregnant (/) of all things, and to make (g). And since apart from the Maker it is impos- sible that anything be generated, so also it is impossible that He ever be not, unless ever making all things in Heaven, in air, in earth, in depth, in every part of the world, in every part of the Universe (7i), in that being and in that not being; for there is nothing in the universal world which is not Him. He is both the Entities * and (a) 'Treptypxtpy. (&) faypoitpov. (c) yfyovtvott. (d) (.e) (Aovog. (f) xvsiv. (ft,euQ$. (e) tieTTTopspeffTspov. (/ (h) xopyiyov. (i) irau yap ro xop POEMANDRES. VI. 43 evil ; nor is any of things being to be lost by Him, having lost which He should be grieved ; for grief is part of eviL Nor is anything superior to Him by which He might be assailed, nor is anything compeer (a) with Him so that He be injured, and for this reason should be in love (6) with it ; nor disobedient with which He should be angry; nor wiser which He might envy. 2. These things then not existing in His Essence, what remains beside but The Good only? for as none of the evil things in such an Essence, so in none of the others will the Good be found. For in all, things are otherwise, both in the small and in the great, and in those individually, and in this the animal the greater and most powerful of all. For things generated (c) are full of passions, the generation , r t itself being subject to passion (d). But where passion is there nowhere is The Good; but where The Good there < nowhere is even one passion. For where day is, nowhere night, but where night, nowhere day. Wherefore impos- sible is it that in generation there be The Good, but in the nongenerate (e) only. For as the common being (/) of all things is bound up in the Matter, so is it also of The Good. In this way the world is good so far as it also makes all things, so as in the part of the making to be good; but in all other things not good. For also it is passible (g), and moveable, and maker of passible things. 3. In the Man indeed the good is ordered according to comparison with the evil For here that which is not very evil is the good, and that here good is the least particle of the eviL It is impossible then to purify the good here from the evil ; for here the good grows evil (&), and being grown evil no longer remains good, and not having remained becomes eviL In The God alone, therefore, is The Good, or The God Himself is The Good. Only, therefore, Asclepius ! is the name of The Good among men, but the fact itself nowhere, for it is impossible. For the material body (a) av^w/oy. (6) epot of the body, the soul cannot have pure knowledge, one of two things must follow; either that knowledge is not to be attained at all, or if at all, after death. In the present life we make the nearest approach to knowledge when we have the least possible communion or fellow- ship with the body, and are not infected with the bodily nature, but remain pure until the hour when God Himself is pleased to release us ; and then the foolishness of the body shall be cleared away, and we shall be pure and hold converse with other pure souls from below, which is no other than the light of Truth, for no impure , thing is allowed to approach the pure." Compare 1 Cor. xiii. 12 " Now I know in part, but then shall I know even as I am known." Also Rev. xxi. 27 "There shall nowise enter into it anything unclean," &c. 2 " I know that in me, that is, in my flesh, dwelleth no good thing " (Rom. vii. 18). "I buffet my body and bring it into bondage" (1 Cor. ix. 27). It is instructive to compare with the text the language of POEMANDRES. VIII. 47 indwelling Good, thou shouldest hate its vileness, having understood the snare, which it hath laid in wait for thee, making those things seeming to us and being considered objects of sense (a), insensible, having obstructed them with much matter, and filled them with abominable pleasure, 1 so that thou shouldest neither hear those things about which it behoves thee to hear, nor discern those about which it behoves thee to discern. CHAPTEK VIII. Tliat none of the Entities perish, ~but mankind erroneously call the changes, destructions and deaths. 1. CONCERNING Soul and body, Son! now is to be discoursed ; in what way verily the soul is immortal, and of what quality (&) is energy in constitution and dissolution of body. For concerning naught of these is the death, but it is intellectual notion (c) of an appellation " immortal," either as vain work (d), or by deprivation of the first letter ; (a) otlffdnr^ptot. (6) tutpyeia B Trorottryi. (c) voyf&di. (d) xsvov spyoy. William Law, in his " Spirit of Prayer" (Part I., Works vii. 84): " Our own life is to be hated, and the reason is plain: it is because there is nothing lovely in it. It is a legion of evil, a monstrous birth of the Serpent, the World, and the Flesh. It is an Apostasy from the Life and Power of God in the Soul a life that is death to Heaven, that is pure unmixed Idolatry, that lives wholly to self and not to God, and therefore all this own life is to be absolutely hated, all this Self is to be denied, and mortified, if the Nature, Spirit, Tempers, and Inclinations of Christ are to be brought to life in us." 1 " I see a different law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity under the law of sin which is in my members. wretched man that I am ! Who shall deliver me out of the body of this death ? (Eom. vii. 23). "The mind of the flesh is enmity against God " (ibid. viii. 7). " They that are in the flesh cannot please God " (ibid. viii. 8). See also Galat. v. 17. 48 HERMES TEISMEG1STUS. that being called Qamrog instead of the aQavarog. 1 For the death is of destruction; but naught of those things in the world is destroyed, for if the World is second God and immortal animal, it is impossible for any part of the im- mortal animal to die ; for all the things in the world are parts of the world, and especially the Man, the rational animal. 2. For first of all really (a), and eternal, and nongenerate, The Creator of The Universe (&), God. But the second that after His image the World by Him engendered, 2 and by Him held together and nourished and immortalized, as by its own father, everliving as immortal. For the ever- living (c) differs from the eternal (d). For The One was not generated by another, and if it be generate, it was yet not generated by itself but always is generate. For the eternal in that it is eternal, is the Universe (e). And The Father Himself, of His Own Self, is eternal, and the World became (/) eternal and immortal by The Father. 3. And so much of matter as was set apart by Him The Father having embodied and swelled out (g) the Whole, formed this sphere like, 3 placing around it such quality (h), (6) TUV (e) TO 'Tracy. (jf) yeyove. (g) oyxuaocg. (Ji) 76 1 See the doctrine of Plato as to what death is (Phsedo, 67). 2 Plato enunciates the same views in the Phsedon and in Timaeus (33 and 41) : " For The God in His power willed that all things should be good, and nothing Lad, and brought the Universe fully out of disorder; for it neither was nor is possible that He should do aught else but what is most beautiful ; thus having completed a work that might be something most beautiful and perfect in its nature. So then, according to the right reason, it behoves one to say that this the Kotrpos became through the Providence of The God a living creature (yov), endued in very truth with Soul and Mind." (See Stobseus, Florilegium, Meineke, iv. 105). ( 3 Plato thought that the xoV^o? was spherical in form. In the i Timseus (33 and 62) he says : " He gave it figure O#jj^ce), the be- coming, and the convenient ; for when about to encompass all living beings in it, with living being (&XM), a figure would be becoming, that comprehending in it all such like figures; wherefore also He described it circular, spherelike from the centre, distant every way so far to POEMANDRES. VIII. 49 being both itself immortal and having the material eternal. But full of the Ideas (a) The Father having sown in the qua- lities, 1 inclosed them in the sphere as if in a cave, 2 willing for every quality to adorn that of quality with itself; but with this immortality having encompassed the whole body, lest the matter having wished to secede from the consti- tution thereof, should be dissolved into its own disorder (>). For when the matter was unincorporate, Child ! it was without order ; but it has even here that revolution (c) 3 in respect of the other small qualities, that of the increase and that of the diminution, which men call death. 4. But this the want of order exists (d) around earthly ani- mals ; for the bodies of the heavenly have one order, which they have allotted from the Father at the beginning; and this is maintained, by the restoration (e) of each, 4 indissoluble ; (a) iofuv. (6) rqv setvTvj$ oira^ixv. (e) r^v tfaovftsvyt. (d) yiviToti. (e) ctKox.otTOKJTtx.atus. the extremities." " So all the heaven being spherelike, and the World thus brought into being every part being equidistant from the centre, to speak of above or below is neither just nor accurate. If any one were to go round this in a circle, often, standing at the antipodes, he would speak of the same part of it as above and below. As I said, to talk of the spherical as having one part above and another below, is not wise." 1 Referring to the "Ideas" or " Forms n which Plato held to be the originals of all things, Plutarch defined the " Idea" thus (quoted byStobaeuSjPhysica, ch. xii. 6a; Meineke,i. 87) : "Idea is Incorporeal Essence, cause of such like beings as itself is, and pattern (^xpec^siy^oc) of the subsistence (tmordtfffas) of the objects of sense (afofaray) having themselves (s^ovrav) according to nature ; it indeed sustained of itself, and imaging (evmcovi^ovyet) shapeless materials, an,d becoming cause of the arrangement QiaTei%eas) of these, applying order of a father to , the objects of sense." Plato, in " Parmenides," says: " It appears to me that the matter stands thus : that these Forms (l/S>j) stand in the Nature as if patterns, and that other things resemble these, and are likenesses, and the participation of the Forms with the others, becomes nothing else than the being assimilated to them." 2 This simile of the cave is borrowed from Plato's Republic, lib. v. 28, 517, et seq.; Hermann, iv. 202. 3 Parthey suggests " confusion/' p. 38. 4 Referring to the return of each to its own place in the heavens. See ante, ch. iii. and note 3 there. D 50 HERMES TR1SMEGISTUS. but the restoration of the earthly bodies is constitution (a) f and the dissolution itself restores (&) to the indissoluble bodies ; that is to say, the immortal ; and thus there be- comes deprivation of the sense, not destruction of the bodies. 5. But the third animal, The Man, generated after the image of the World, but having Mind, according to the will of the Father beyond other earthly animals, not only has sympathy with the second God, but also intelligence (c) of the first ; for of the one it is sensible as of body, but of the other it receives intelligence as of an incorporeal and of the Good Mind (d). Tat. This animal, then, does not perish? Hermes. Speak well (e), Child! and understand what God is, what the World, what an immortal animal, what a dissoluble animal, and understand that the World indeed is from The God, and in The God, but the Man from the world, and in the world, but the beginning and comprehen- sion (/) and constitution of all things is The God. 1 CHAPTEE IX. Concerning Understanding and Sense (g), and that in The God only is The Beautiful and The Good, lut elsewhere not at all. 1. YESTEKDAY, Asclepius ! I delivered the perfect Discourse ; but now I consider necessary, consequential to that,' tcTgo also through the discourse respecting Sense. For sense and understanding seem indeed to have differ- (a) avaroiffig. (6) ek^oxx^itnetrxf. (c) (d) vov TOV otyaQov. (e) tvtpqpYia'ou. (jf ) 'Trs (cj) i/ojjffg&j, understanding ; diffdyvsas, sense. 1 It seems evident from the contents of this Chapter, connected with what precedes and what follows, that Poemandres, in mystical POEMANDRES. IX. 51 ence, because that is material (a), but this essential (b) ; but to me both seem to be united, and not to be separated among men, by Keason (c). For in the other animals the sense is united to the nature, but in men understanding (d). But) Mind differs from understanding as much as The God from_/ Divinity (e). For the Divinity indeed is generate by(/) God, but understanding by the Mind, being sister of the speech and organs of each other. For neither is the speech uttered apart (y) from understanding, nor is the under- standing shown without speech. 2. The Sense then and the Understanding, both to- gether, have influence (h) upon the Man, as it were, con- , nected with each other. For neither apart from Sense is it possible to understand, 1 nor to have sensation apart from understanding. But it is possible to understand Understanding (i) apart from Sense, as those fancying (k) visions in their dreams ; but it seems to me that both the energies are generated in the vision of the dreams, and that the sense is aroused to wakefulness out of sleep. For the Man has been divided both into the body and into the Soul, and when both the parts of the Sense shall concord one with another, then that the understanding is spoken out and brought forth (I) by the Mind. 3. For the Mind conceives all the thoughts (in) ; good indeed when it shall have received the seeds from The God, but the contrary when from any of the demons ; no (a) I/TUXJJ. (ft) ovataion;. (c) (d) vow;, or intellect. (e) QSIOTYIS. (/) (Jc) (p&vrsioft,voi, imagining. (I) dtroKv/idswoiy. (m) x,vzi language, means to teach the future immortality of the human body (see Philippians iii. 21), after a renovation of the same after death. He seems also to hold the future eternity of created matter. Plato, in Timeeus, had declared that the xoV^o? was perishable, so far as its nature was concerned, for it was an object of sense, because corporeal, but that it will never perish by the providence and continuous cohe- rence (aotvo-fcYi) of God, 1 See Locke, " No Innate Ideas." " Nihil in intellectu quod non prius fuit in sensu." 52 HERMES TRISMEGISTUS. part of the world being vacant from the Demon; that Demon to be separated from The God ; who entering in unawares (a) sowed the seed of his own energy, and the Mind conceived what was sown : l adulteries, murders, parricides, sacrileges, impieties, stranglings, hurling down from pre- cipices, and all other such the works of evil demons. 2 4. For the seeds of The God are few, but great and both beautiful and good: Virtue, and Temperance, and Piety. But Piety is Knowledge of God, 3 which he who recogniseth (fr), becoming full of all the good things, pos- sesses (c) the divine thoughts, and not like the many. Because of this, those being in knowledge, neither please the many, nor the many them ; they seem to be mad, and occasion laughter, and being hated and despised, and per- haps also murdered. For we have said that wickedness (d) must dwell here, being in its own region ; for its region is the earth (e), not the World (/) as some may say blas- pheming. But the Godfearing man will contemn all things, perceiving the Knowledge. For all things to such an one, although to others the evil, are good ; and taking counsel he refers all things unto the Knowledge, and what is wonderful, alone renders the evils good (#). 4 5. I return again to the discourse of Sense. Human, then, is the common Union (A) in man, of sense with under- standing. But not every man, as I said before, enjoys (a.) vmiathQuv. (6) /Iflr/yvovf. (c) (d) xoix.iotv. (e) % yij. (/) (g) dy a, Gorton*. (Ji) TO xouHMqaett. 1 See the parable of the Sower, Matthew xiii. 39. " Out of the heart of men proceed evil thoughts, adulteries" (Mark vii. 21). "When lust hath conceived, it bringeth forth sin" (James i. 15). See also Galat. v. 19. 2 See Lactant., Div. Instit., ii. 15, 16, where these sentiments are quoted as from Hermes. 3 Quoted by Lactant., ibid. 16. See John xvii. 3. " And this is life eternal, that they might know Thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom Thou hast sent." That this wisdom and knowledge is identical with piety, St Augustine maintains in his Eucheiridion. 4 It is superfluous to refer to the numerous passages of Holy Scrip- ture which enunciate the same doctrines as those here set forth. POEMANDEES. IX. 53 this understanding, but one is material, another essential. For the one along with wickedness (material, as I said), from the demons possesses (a) the seed of the understand- ing ; but these along with the essentially good are saved by The God. For The God is the Creator of all things ; creating all things He makes all things like to Himself; but these good things generated, in the use of energy are barren : for the worldly course rubbing against (b) these generations (c), makes them qualities, soiling these indeed with the evilness, but purifying those with the Good. For the World also, O Asclepius! has its proper sense and understanding, not like to the human nor as various, but as superior and simpler. 6. For the sense and understanding of the World is one, in the making all things, and unmaking them into itself, organ of the will of The God; and so organised, that, having received all the seeds unto itself from The God, conserving them in itself, it might manifestly (d) make all things, and dissolving might renew all things ; and when thus dissolved, as a good agriculturist of life it imparts by the change a renewal to these its offspring (e). There is nothing that it does not engender alive (/). But bearing it makes all things alive, and it is at once the place and the creator of life. 7. But the bodies from matter are in difference. For some indeed are from earth, some from water, some from air, and some from fire ; but all are composite (#), and some are more so, some more simple ; more so indeed are the heavier, the lighter less so. But the velocity (A) of its course effects the variety of the generations of qualities (j). For breath (&) being very dense stretches forth the quali- ties (I) over the bodies with one fulness, that of the life. 8. The God indeed then is Father of the World, but the World of things in the world. And the World indeed is (a) iff%tf. (b) 93 xofffifKq (f>opoi rpifiovaa,, wearing away. (c) ra,s '/tviati;. (d) ti/etpyas. (e) (f>voftei/ot^. (/) oyoj>/. (g) avvQiTet. (h) i.e., rot> (t) rUSt 7TOIUSI '/WitJttoV. (k) KVQV). (I) 54 HERMES TRISMEGISTUS. son of The God ; but things in the World are from the World, and properly was it called " World " (%6H(r0a(~ God, that we can discover nothing but in His Light, and that we shall be unintelligible to ourselves until we see in God. Still He presents to ourselves the Idea perfectly intelligible which He has of our being comprehended in His Own " (Malebranche, RechercJie de la Verite, lib. 3, part 2, ch. i.). 1 " In thy light shall we see Light" (Ps. xxxvi. 9). "The Lord shall be unto thee an everlasting light " (Is. Ix. 19). " To give th light of the knowledge of the glory of God" (2 Cor. iv. 6). " God is Light, and in Him is no darkness at all " (I John i. 5 ; and see John viii. 12, 9, 5). " Who only hath immortality dwelling in light un- approachable " (1 Tim. vi. 16), &c., &c. 2 Lactantius (Div. Instit., i. 11) alludes to this passage as a proof/ that both were men, and never really Divinities. 3 " Now we see in a mirror darkly " (1 Cor. xiii. 12). 58 HERMES TRISMEGISTUS. ledge of It is both divine silence and repose (a) of all the Senses. 6. For he having understood this is neither able to understand any other thing, nor he having beheld this to behold any other thing, nor to hear of any other thing, neither to move his entire body. For seizing hold of all his bodily senses and motions he moves not (6) ; but ! shining around all the mind and the whole soul, it en- lightens and abstracts from the body, and transforms the ! whole of it into the Essence of God. 1 For it is possible, Child ! that the soul be deified (c), placed in body of Man, having beheld the beauty of The Good. 7. Tat. To be deified how sayest thou, Father ? Hermes. Of every soul divisible, Child! there are changes. Tat. How again divisible ? Hermes. Hast thou not heard in the Generics (d) that / from one soul that of the Universe (e) are all souls them- selves which are rolled about (/) in all the world, as if distributed ? Of these the souls then, many are the changes ; of these indeed into a happier, of those into the opposite. Some then indeed being reptile, are changed into watery ' beings, but some of the watery into terrestrial, but those terrestrial into winged, those serial into men, and those of humankind possess the beginning of immortality changing into demons. Whence thus they pass into the choir of the unerring Gods. But there are two choirs of Gods; (a) KXTotpyix. (6) oirpsftii. (c) (d) kv ro7$ ytvixots. (e) rq$ TOV TTOCVTO;. (jf) 1 f< We all with unveiled face reflecting as a mirror the glory of the Lord, are transformed into the- same image from glory to glory " (2 Cor. iii. 18, Revised Version). " That by these " (promises) " ye may "become partakers of the Divine Nature " (2 Pet. i. 4. See 1 John iii. 2). As remarked above (ch. iv. 6), Hermes here enunciates the sentiments and objects of the real Christian Mystics of all ages, espe- cially those of the Fathers of the desert, and of the two Macarii Egyptii, of St Augustine, Fenelon, Malebranche, and many others, -especially of the author of the " Imitation of Christ." See ante, ch. iv. 1 and 6, and note there. POEMANDRES. X. 59 one indeed of those erring, 1 the other of those unerring, and this is the most perfect glory of the SouL 8. For Soul entering into the body of a man if it remain Evil, neither tastes immortality nor partakes of the Good, but retrograde turns its way back to that of the reptiles. And this is the condemnation of an evil soul ; ignorance is the vice of soul. For a soul nothing acquainted with the Entities > nor the nature of them, nor with The Good, being blind, is entangled with the bodily passions ; and the unfortunate, not having known itself, serves bodies alien and de- praved (a), carrying the body as if a burthen, 2 and not ruling but ruled over. This is Vice of Soul. 9. Contrariwise, Virtue of Soul is Knowledge. For he knowing is both good and pious and already Divine. Tat But who is this, Father ? Hermes. He neither speaking many things, nor hearing many things ; for he listening (b) to two discourses and hearings, fights with a shadow. For The God and Father and the Good is neither spoken nor heard. But this having itself thus, in all the Entities are the Senses ; because of its not being possible to be, apart from them. Knowledge differs much from Sense. For Sense is generate from that overpowering (c), but Knowledge is the end of Science (d), but Science gift of The God. For all Science is incorporeal, using for an organ the Mind itself, but the Mind using the body. 10. Both then enter (e) into bodies, things mental and material; for from antithesis and contrariety must all things consist (/), and it is impossible that this should be otherwise. Tat. Who then is this material God ? Hermes. The beautiful World, but it is not good. For it is material and easily passible, and it is indeed the first of the passibles, but second of the Entities and wanting (g) (a) p,ox0qpot$. (6) a^oXa^y. (c) yivercti rov I /rf) f^-KTTtjftris. (e) xupsi ti$. (/) ^si rotvoivrct ovvtaroivoii, 1 "The Angels which kept not their first Estate" (Jude 6). 2 " The body of this death " (Rom. vii. 24). 60 HERMES TRISMEGISTUS. to itself, and itself sometime generated, but ever in being ; being too in generation and ever generated. Generation is of qualities and quantities ; for it is moveable. 11. For every material movement is generation. The mental state (a) moves the material movement in this manner, since the world is a sphere, that is a head ; but above head there is nothing material; just as neither i& there anything mental beneath the feet, but all material. But Mind, head itself is moved spherically, that is simi- larly to a head. As many things then as are united to the membrane (&) of this the head wherein is the soul, are by nature (c) immortal, as if [of the body formed in Soul] ; and having the Soul full (d) of [or fuller than] x the body. But things distant from the membrane, in which the body possesses more than the soul, are by nature mortal ; but all is a living animal ; so that the universe is composed both of material and mental. 12. And the World indeed is first, 2 but the Man second animal after the World, but first of the things mortal ; and indeed of the other animals he has the living quality (e)< in him. Not, moreover, is he only not good, but also evil, as mortal. For the World is not good as moveable, but not evil as immortal, but the Man both as moveable and as mortal is evil. 13. But the Soul of man is carried on (/) in this way: The Mind in the Eeason, the Eeason in the Soul, the Soul in the Spirit, the Spirit in the Body. The Spirit pene- trating through the veins and arteries and blood moves the animal, and as it were, after a certain manner, supports it. Wherefore also some have thought the Soul to be blood ; being mistaken as to the nature, not knowing that first must the Spirit return back into the Soul, and then the (a) vovrrv) ara,ais. (b) ru vptvi. (c) (d) TtKypTfi. (e) TO efA*J/v%o, (/) ' 1 Menard reads TT^IU (more of soul than body), which is doubtless the meaning. The passage is probably corrupt. 2 This and the next section are extracted by Stobseus (Physica, 770 ;. Meineke, i. 215). (a) xotQe'htw. (b) rot^ati/ra, qpnfrrott. (c) (d) S/aAvff/i/. (e) ayxuftwov. (/) (g) oyxffff. (h) dioc^Vffotffoe.. 1 So far as in Stobaeus (Eclog. Physica; Meineke, i 212). As to the subject of death, see Part II., Excerpts by Stobseus in the Florile- gium, ch. ii; Meineke, iv. 106, and ante, ch. viii. 1, 2, and^postf, xi. 15. 2 " This is life eternal, that they should know Thee The Only True God " (John xvii. 3). " And hath given us an understanding (otxvoiotv'), that we may know Him that is true. . . . This is the true God, and eternal life" (1 John v. 20). POEMANDRES. X. 61 blood be coagulated, and the veins and the arteries be I emptied, and then the animal perish (a), and this is the j death of the Body. 1 14. From one beginning have all things depended (&), but the beginning is from The One and Only. And the beginning indeed is moved, that beginning may again be- come (c), but The One stands abiding, and is not moved. And three therefore are these, The God and Father and The Good, and the World and the Man. And The God hath indeed the World, but the World the Man. And the World indeed is generated Son of The God ; but the Man as it were offspring of the World. 15. For The God ignoreth not the Man, but moreover thoroughly knoweth him and desires to be known. This alone is saving for Man, The knowledge of The God. 2 This is the ascent to the Olympus. By this alone the Soul becometh Good, and not sometimes Good, sometimes Evil ; but becomes so of necessity. Tat. How sayest thou this, Trismegistus ? Hermes. Contemplate a Soul of a boy, Child! not having yet received its distribution (d\ his body being yet small and not yet fully amplified (e). Tat How? Hermes. Beautiful to look upon everywhere, and not yet defiled by the passions of the body, still almost depen- dent from the Soul of the world ; but when the body has been amplified (/) and shall have drawn it out, into the masses (g) of the body, having distributed (h) itself, it engenerates oblivion, and partakes not of the beautiful and 62 HERMES TRISMEGISTUS. good. And the oblivion becomes vice. And the same thing happens to those departing out of the body. f 16. For the Soul recurring back into itself, 1 the Spirit is ! contracted into the blood, and the Soul into the Spirit, but the Mind becoming pure from its garments being divine I by nature, taking a fiery body, circulates in every place,, having abandoned the Soul to judgment and to the punish- ment according to desert. Tat. Row speakest thou this, Father ? 2 The Mind is separated from the Soul, and the Soul from the Spirit, thou having said the Soul to be garment of the Mind, but of the Soul the Spirit ? 17. Hermes. It behoves the hearer to agree in mind, Child I with the speaker, and to consent, and to have his hearing more acute than the voice of the speaker. The composition of these garments, Child! is generate in an earthly body. For it is impossible that the Mind i should establish itself by itself naked in an earthly body, for neither is any earthly body able to bear (a) I so great immortality nor to endure (5) this such virtue, c v \ a body with passions being under the same skin with it. It hath taken then as it were an envelope (c) the Soul. But the Soul also itself being something divine uses the Spirit as if an envelope. But the Spirit per- vades the Animal. 18. When then the Mind has departed from the earthly body, it forthwith puts on its own the fiery tunic, which it could not, having to dwell in the earthly body. For earth sustains not fire, for all is enflamed even by a small spark. And because of this the water is diffused around the Earth as rampart and wall resisting against the flame of the fire. Mind however being the most swift of all divine thoughts, and swifter than all the elements, has its body the Fire. For The Mind being Creator of all things, uses the Fire as (a) myxfcfv. (6) Kys%taQeu. (c) ^rg|0//3oA^i/. 1 See post, sec. 21, and note. 2 The following is extracted "by Stotseus (Physica, 775 ; Meineke, i. 219). POEMANDRES. X. 6S an instrument towards that Creation. 1 That Mind indeed [Creator] of the Universe uses all things, but that of the Man things upon earth only. For the mind upon earth being destitute of the Fire is unable to create the things Divine, being human in the administration. 19. But the human soul, not every one but the pious, is a kind of demonhood (a) and divine ; and such a soul after the departure from the body, having striven the strife of this piety (but strife of piety is having known The God 2 and to have wronged no man) becomes wholly Mind. But the impious Soul remains in that its proper Essence (b\ punished by itself and seeking an earthly body into which it may enter, being human (c). For other body 3 does not yield place (d) to a human soul ; nor is it justice (e) that a human soul should degrade (/) into a body of an irra- tional animal. For of God is this law, to guard a human Soul from this so great disgrace. 4 () <$flC/,c40J'/ot T/?. (fy i^ioig ovaia,$. (c) (d) YjucT-i. (e) 6sf*,is. (/) 1 See ante, ch. i. The following section 19 is extracted by Stobseus (Physica, 1007 ; Meineke, i. 307). 2 Quoted by Lactantius (Divin. Instit., ii. 16, and v. 15 ; see also iii. 9). " This is Life eternal, that they should know Thee The Only True God" (John xvii. 3). 3 It has been surmised from this passage that Hermes (with Plato) "] held that the souls of the dead generally might pass into other human > bodies. But as to this point, see post contra. * Hermes here dissents from Platonism. Plato, speaking as from Socrates (Phsedo, 80), says: "The Soul, the very likeness of the Divine and immortal, and intellectual and uniform, and indissoluble and unchangeable; the Body the likeness of the human, mortal, unintellectual, multiform, dissoluble, and changeable. Must we suppose that the Soul which is invisible, passing to the true Hades, which like her is invisible, and pure and noble, and on her way to the True and Wise God, whither if God will my [soul is also soon to go: that the Soul, if this be her nature and origin, is blown away and perishes immediately on quitting the body as the many say? v That can never be. The truth rather is that that soul which is pure at departing and draws after her no bodily taint, having never volun- tarily been connected with the body, which she is ever avoiding, her- self gathered into herself which has been the study of her life, 64 HERMES TRISMEGISTUS. 20. Tat. How then is the human soul punished, O Father ? Hermes. And what is a greater punishment of a human -Soul, Child ! than the impiety ? and what sort of fire has so great a flame as this impiety? and what kind of de- vouring wild beast thus maltreats the body so much, as this impiety the very Soul ? Or seest thou not, how many evils the impious Soul suffers ? shouting and crying out, " I am burned, I am consumed ; what I may say, what I meaning that she has studied true philosophy, the practice of death ; that soul herself invisible, departs to the invisible world, to the Divine, immortal, and rational. Thither arriving she is secure of bliss and is released from the errors and follies of men, their fears and wild passions and all other human ills, and ever dwells, as they say of the initiated, in company with the Gods. But the soul, which has been polluted and impure at the time of her departure and always the servant of the body, enamoured and fascinated by it and by its desires and pleasures, until she believes that Truth exists only in a bodily form which a man may use for the purposes of his lusts, and is accustomed to hate and fear and avoid the intellectual principle, which to the bodily eye is invisible and can only be attained by philosophy, do you suppose that such a soul will depart pure and unalloyed 1 She is held fast by the corporeal, which is heavy and earthy. They are dragged down again to the visible, to the tombs and sepulchres, compelled to wander about such places in payment of the penalty of their former evil ways. The craving after the corporeal never leaves them, and they are imprisoned finally in another body, imprisoned in the same natures which they had in their former lives. Men who have followed after gluttony and wan- tonness and drunkenness pass into apes and animals of that sort: those who have chosen injustice and tyranny into wolves and hawks and kites, according to their several natures and propensities. Some may be happier than others who have practised civil and social virtues, such as temperance and justice, although not acquired by philosophy. They may pass into some quiet and social nature like their own, such as bees, wasps, or ants, or back into the form of men. But he who is a philosopher and lover of learning, who is entirely pure at depart- ing, is alone permitted to attain to the Divine nature. This is why the true votaries of philosophy abstain from all fleshly lusts, and refuse to give themselves up to them. They who have any care of their own souls, say farewell to all this ; they will not walk in the ways of the blind, and when philosophy offers purification and relief from il, they turn and follow it." POEM A NDEES. X. 65 shall do, I know not. I am eaten up, the unfortunate, by the ills enclosing me ! I neither see nor, the miserable, do I hear ! " These are the voices of the soul being punished, not as the many suppose and thou opinest, Child ! that a soul going forth from the body becomes a wild beast (a), which is a very great error. 1 21. For the Soul is punished after this manner. But the Mind when it becometh demon, is ordained to acquire a fiery body for the ministries (b) of The God, and entering into the very impious soul chastises it with the scourges of the sins; by which being scourged, the impious soul turns itself to murders, and injuries, and blasphemies, and various violences, and other tilings by which men are wronged; but the Mind enter- ing into the pious Soul guides it to the light of the Knowledge. And the such like Soul never ever experi- ences satiety, hymning and blessing all men, and in words and deeds doing all things well, imitating its own Father. 2 22. Wherefore, O Child! giving thanks to The God, it behoves to pray to obtain the beautiful Mind. The Soul then passes on to the superior, but to the inferior it is im- (a) 0yipiei(Tcti. (6) VTrspqefots. 1 See ante xix., sec. 4, note. Plato in Timceus (42) had also spoken thus : " Those who are domi- nated by bodily passions shall be avenged by justice ; but he that has passed well the proper time, living again, proceeding to the dwell ing of the associate (^vwofiov) star, will lead a happy life ; but failing of these he will in his second birth change into the nature of a woman ; but not ceasing then from the way of evil by which he was debased, he changes into some beastly nature, and shall not cease from labours, until by reason having conquered the great tumult and debasement, and being other, he return to the form of the first and best habitude (H*> 2 Compare Wisdom, iii. 1-10 : " The souls of the righteous are in the hand of God, and there shall no torment touch them. In the sight of the unwise they seemed to die. . . Yet is their hope full of immortality. . . . But the ungodly shall be punished accord- ing to their own imaginations, which have neglected the righteous and forsaken the Lord." 66 HERMES TRISMEGISTUS. passible. 1 For there is a community of Souls, and those of the Gods hold communion with those of the men, and those of the men with those of the irrationals. But the superior take care of the inferior, Gods of men, 2 but men of the irrational animals, but The God of all. For He is Superior to all, and all are inferior to Him. The World then is subject to The God; but the Man to the World, and the irrational to the Man; but The God is over all things and about all things. And of The God indeed the Energies are like as rays, and of the World the natures are rays, but of the Man the arts and sciences are rays. And these Energies indeed energize throughout the world, and upon the Man through the physical rays of the World, but the natures through the elements, but the men through the Arts and Sciences. 23. And this is the administration of the Universe (a), dependent from the Nature of The One and pervading it through the Mind of One. 3 Than which nothing is more divine and more energetic, or more unitive (&) of Men in- deed to the Gods, or of Gods to the Men. This is the Good demon. Blessed the Soul which is fullest of this; unfortunate the Soul which is void of this. Tat. How sayest thou thus again, Father? Hermes. Dost thou think then, Child! that every soul has the good Mind? for it is of this that our discourse is about, not concerning the servile one(c), concerning whom we have just before spoken, him sent down- wards (d) because of the judgment. 24. For Soul apart from the Mind can neither say any- (ct) B/o/fc>70'/ rov KOIVTOS. (b) kvutiKOrtipov. (c) VKYipsrixov. (d) Kd.roe.'Tri^'Trof^ivov. 1 The following, down to the end of this chapter, is extracted by Stobaeus (Physica, 766; Meineke, i. 213). 2 " Are they " (i.e., Angels) " not all ministering Spirits, sent forth to do service for the sake of them that shall inherit salvation?" (Heb. i. 14). " When The Most High divided the nations, when He separated the Sons of Adam, He set the bounds of the nations according to the number of the Angels of God" (Deut. xxxii. 8, Septuagint Version). 3 Or " through the One Mind." POEMANDRES. X. 67 thing nor do anything. For, oftentimes the Mind hath departed out of (a) the Soul; and in that hour the Soul neither discerns nor hears, but is like an irrational animal. So great is the power of the Mind; but neither does it endure an inert (6) Soul, but relinquishes the Soul of such sort attached to the body, and by it drawn downwards. The Soul of this sort, O Child! has not Mind. Wherefore neither ought one to call such an one Man. For Man is a Divine Animal, and is not com- parable with the other animals, those upon earth, but with those above in Heaven called Gods, 1 or rather, if it behoveth one boldly to speak the truth, the Man really is above them, or, they are altogether equipollent with each other. 25. For no one indeed of the heavenly Gods shall de- scend unto earth, having left the boundary of Heaven, but the Man ascends unto the Heaven, and measures it, and knows what kind of things of it are on high, and what kind below, and learns all other things accurately; and what is greater than all, without leaving this earth he becomes on high. So great is the grandeur to him of this (c) exten- sion. Wherefore it is to be dared to say that the Man upon earth is a mortal God, but the Heavenly God an ; immortal Man. Wherefore through (d) these the Two are all things administered, World and Man ; but by (c) The 1 One all things. 2 (a) |gi. (b) varpx;. (c) exToursas; in Stobaeus the word is gxoi> rov xoaftov. (c) 1 Plato (Timseus, 92): " This the World having thus received ani- mals, mortal and immortal, and having been fulfilled, became a visible animal, containing the visible, sensible God, Image of The ! Intelligible, the greatest the best, the most beautiful and most per- fect, one Heaven ; This being only begotten." 70 HERMES TRISMEGISTUS. wouldest fall from the truth. For nothing is like to The without like and Only and One; and not to any other one shouldst thou think that He yields in the power. For who beside Him is either Life and 1 Immortality, and change of quality? And what else should He do? For The God is not inert, else all things would become inert ; for every- thing is full of God, for neither in the world is inertness (a) anywhere, nor in any other. For inertness is an empty word, both as to the maker and the thing generated. 6. For all things must be generate, both always and according to the preponderance (&) of each place. For the Maker is in all things, not settled (c) in any, nor Making in something, but all things. 2 For Power being energizing, is not self sufficient (d) in the things generated, but the generated are under Him. Contemplate through me the World subjected to thy view, and consider accurately the beauty of it, a body indeed undecayable (e), and than which nothing is more ancient, and throughout the whole in full vigour (/) and new, and still more vigorous. 7. Behold also those subject Seven Worlds arranged in eternal order and in different course fulfilling the Eternity, and all things full of light, but fire no where, for the friendship and the combination of things opposite and those dissimilar became Light, shining forth through the energy of The God, 3 Generator of all Good, and Prince (g) of all order and guide of the Seven Worlds; a Moon, the precursor of all these, Organ of the Nature changing the Matter below; (a) dpyta. (6) povq*. (c) ifyvftittog, (d) d,urix.px,ys. (e) dxyipoiTov. (f) eUxftouov, ((/) oip-^Qvrog. 1 " Who only hath immortality, dwelling in Light unapproachable " (1 Tim. vi. 16). 2 " However destitute Planets, Moons, and rings may be of inhabi- tants, they are at least vast scenes of God's presence and of the activity with which He carries into effect everywhere the laws of nature; and the glory of creation arises from its being not only the product but the constant field of God's activity and thought, wisdom, and power " (WhewelTs " Plurality of Worlds," ch. xii., Fourth Edit, 382. See sec. 12, post}. 3 " And God said, Let Light be, and Light was " (Gen. i. 3). POEMANDRES. XI. 71 and the Earth in the midst of the Universe, established as support (a) of this beautiful World, 1 nourisher and nurse of those upon Earth. Behold also the multitude of the im- mortal animals how large it is, and of the mortal; in the midst of both as well of the immortal as of the mortal, the Moon revolving around. 8. All things then are full of Soul, and all things pro- perly (6) moved by that; some indeed around the Heaven, but others around the Earth, and neither the right towards the left, nor the left towards the right; nor those above downwards, nor those below upwards. And that all these , are generate, most beloved Hermes ! thou dost not still I j need to learn of me; for they are bodies, and have soul, and are moved. But for these to concur (c) in one is im- possible apart from the gatherer (cT). 9. This then must be some one and such altogether One. For different and many being the motions and the bodies not similar, yet but one velocity ordered throughout all, it is impossible that there be two or more Makers ; for the one order is not preserved with many. For in the feebler, emulation will ensue of the superior, and they will contend. And if other was the Maker of the mutable animals and mortals, he would have desired to make immortals also ; just as also he of the immortals, mortals. Suppose then if also there be two ; one being the Matter and one the Soul, with which of them would be the conducting of the making (e) ? and if somewhat also with both, with whom the larger portion ? 10. But think thus, as of every living body having the constitution (/) of Matter and Soul, and of the immortal and of the mortal, and of the irrational. For all living (a) i/Troffrafy^j/. (6) /S/fiij. (c) (d) %api$ TOV ffvi/ayovro$. (e) yfi^yiac, ry$ TTOiqffeas. (/) 1 See ante, ch. iii. 4, and note there. Mr Proctor, in his work, " Our place among Infinities," states that the Egyptians held that the Sun and Moon revolved round the Earth, but the five other planets round the Sun. But this passage proves the general belief to have been that the whole system revolved round the Earth, which remained stationary in the midst. 72 HERMES TEISMEGISTUS. bodies are animated (a), but those not living are again matter by itself. And Soul likewise by itself approached to (b) the Maker is cause of the life ; but cause of all the life is that which is (cause) of the immortals. Hermes. How then are also the mortal animals different from the mortal ? And how is it that the immortal and making immortality, makes not the animals (so) ? 11. Mind. And that there is some One who is making these things is plain, and that He is also One is most manifest ; for also there is one Soul and one Life and one Matter. Hermes. Who then is He ? fi Mind. Who may it be other than The One God ? For ,j to whom can it belong to make animated animals but to the God only? 1 One then is God. Most ridiculous then if having acknowledged the World to be One and the Sun , One and the Moon One and The Divinity One, but The God ^Himself to be as multiple (c) as you wish. 2 12. He then makes everything in many ways. And what great thing is it for The God to make life and soul and immortality and change, thou doing such many things. For thou seest, and speakest, and hearest, and smellest, and tastest, and touchest, and walkest, and understandest, and breathest, and it is not another who is seeing, and another who is hearing, and another who is speaking, and other who is touching, and other who is smelling, and other who is walking, and other who is understanding, and other who is breathing, but one who is doing all these things. But neither are these possible to be apart from The God. For just as, shouldest thou become inert (d) of these, thou art no longer animal ; so neither, should The God become I inert of them, what it is not lawful to say, no longer is ; He God. 13. For if it is demonstrated that nothing is possible to (ft) [4\]/vx.ot. (6) 7retpxx,sif^ivv}. (c) iroarov. (d) xxTOipyvj^s. 1 Quoted by Lactant. (Divin. Instit., i., vi.). 2 This passage disconnects the author from all complicity with the Egyptian or Greek Mythology. POEMANDRES. XL 7$ be l [apart from The God or inert], by how much rather The God. For if there is anything that He does not make, if it be lawful to say it He is imperfect. But if He is not inert but perfect, then He makes all things. For a little give thyself up to -me, Hermes! thou wilt the more easily understand the work of The God as being one: that all the things generate be generate, whether those once gener- ated, as those about to be generated. But this, O most beloved ! is Life, this is The Beautiful ; this is The Good, this is The God. 14. If thou wishest also to understand this in operation, see what would happen to thee wishing to engender. But this is not like to Him, for He indeed is not delighted, nor has He another co-operator. For being selfworking (a) He is always in the work, being Himself what He makes. For if He should be separated from it, of necessity all things must collapse, all things be deathstruck as there not being life ; but if all things are living, and One also the Life, One then also is The God. And again, if all things are living, both those in the heaven and those in the earth, and one Life throughout all things is generate by The God, and this is The God, then all things are generate by The God. But Life is the Union (b) of Mind and Soul. Death how- ever not the destruction of the compounds but dissolution of the union. 2 15. 3 [Eternity then is the image of The God but of the eternity the world, of the world the Sun, of the Sun the man]. But this transmutation the people say to be death, because that the body indeed is dissolved, but the life, it being dissolved, departs to the obscure (c). But in this dis- (a) avrovp'/os. (6) svaais. (c) its TO et$ctv$. 1 Parthey's note (p. 92) here is : " Post slveu, excidisse videtur %ppi$ TOU 6iov." But query whether not " x,ot,Ta,pyy}[ttvov" "inert." (See a similar argument, Lactant., de Ira Dei, ch. 11). 2 See ante, sec. 14, and note. Also ch. viii. 1, 2; ch. x. 13; and post, Part II., Excerpt II. by Stobseus, and notes there. 3 It seems probable, as suggested by L. Menard (p. 76), that this phrase has been interpolated here by some copyist or scholiast, it being out of place with what precedes and follows. 74 HERMES TRISMEGISTUS. -course, Hermes! most beloved to me I say, as thou nearest, the World also to be transformed because of part of it becoming each day in the obscure, but by no means to be dissolved. And these are the passions (a) of the World, revolutions and occultations (b). And the revolution is conversion (c), but the occult ation, renovation. 16. For the World is of all manner of forms (d\ not having the forms lying without, but itself changing them in itself. Since then the World was generated of all forms, He having made it, what should He be? for without form (e) indeed He cannot be, and if He be also of all forms He will be like to the World. But having one form so far He will be inferior to the World. What then may we say Him to be? lest we reduce the discourse into doubt- fulness ; for nothing doubtful is to be understood about The God. He has then one Idea (/), which is His proper own(#), which incorporeal, may not be subject of(h) the sight ; and shows all [ideas] by means of the bodies. And be not astonished if there be some incorporeal idea. 17. For it is as if that of the discourse, and margins (i) in the writings (&). For they are seen being wholly out- side, but smooth in the nature, they are also entirely even. But consider what is said more boldly, but yet more truth- fully. For just as a man cannot live apart from life, so neither can The God live without doing the Good. For this is as it were Life and as it were motion of The God, to move all things and to vivify. 18. But some of the things spoken ought to have pecu- liar consideration ; understand as such what I say. All things are in The God ; not as if lying in place ; for the place indeed is both body and immoveable, and things lying have not motion. For they lie otherwise (I) in in- corporeal, otherwise in appearance. Understand Him com- prising all things, and understand, that than the incorporeal, (a) 7ra,9n. (It) ^tvyatis x.ot,\ x,pvi]/et$. (c) (d) 'TroiVTOff.op^of. (e) olpoptyoc. (/) (y) fttoi. (fl) VTroffretty. (i) ocxpapsioe.1. POEMANDRES. XI. 75 there is nothing more comprehensive (a), nor quicker nor more powerful, but it of all things is the most compre- hensive and quickest and most powerful. 19. And understand thus of (b) thyself, and command the Soul of thife to proceed to India, and quicker than thy command it will be there; command it to proceed to the Ocean, and there again it will quickly be, not as if having passed on from place to place, but as if being there. Command it also to fly up to the Heaven, and it will not be in want of wings; nor will anything be hindrance to it, neither the fire of the Sun, nor the atmosphere, nor the revolution (c), nor the bodies of the other stars, but, piercing through all, it will fly up even to the last body. And if thou shouldest wish even to break through this Universe (d), and to behold the things without (if in- deed there be anything without the World), it is possible for thee. 20. See how much power, how much speed thou hast ! Art thou able for all these things together, but The God not? After this manner then understand The God as if that He had all understandings (e) in Himself, the whole World itself. If then thou wouldest not compare (/) thy- self with The God, thou canst not understand The God; for like is understandable by like. Augment thyself to an immeasurable magnitude, having got rid of all body, and having surpassed all time, become eternity; and thou wilt understand The God. Having supposed (g) in thyself nothing impossible, think thyself immortal and able to understand all things: every art indeed, every science, the habit of every animal. Become more lofty than every height and lower than every depth. Collect in thyself all the sensations (h) of the things made, of fire, water, dry and moist, and at the same time to be everywhere in earth, in sea, in heaven, not yet to have been born, to be in the womb, young, old, to have died, things after the death, and (Ci) 7TplX,TlXr6)TtpOV. (6) CCITO. (c) V) B/1/J7. (d) etvro oAov. (e) voqftoiTa. (/) (g) i>7ro(TT-/i generation on which I have made comment; that we may not be calumniators of the Universe towards the many, to whom God Himself does not will to reveal it. 1 14. Tat. Tell me, Father ! has this the EocTy, that constituted of Powers, ever dissolution ? Hermes. Speak well ! and utter not impossibles, since thou wiliest sin, and the eye of thy mind be made impious. The sensible body of the Nature is far off from the essen- tial generation (g). For that is dissoluble but this indis- soluble, and that mortal, but this immortal ; knowst thou not that thou hast been born God 2 and Son of the One, which also I ? (a) Tc&vTOftoptpov Bg foiet. (6) d; (c) irpovsrsiot. (rf) ij/vwyovog, (e) % tvec.$. (/) TO rpixy ^txffTXToif, i.e., Body, Soul, Spirit, (g) 1 This passage is doubtful in meaning, with various readings, some of which omit the negative. (See Parthey, 122, note). 2 " I said ye are gods, and ye are all the children of the Highest. The Sons of God," applied to men (Gen. vi. 2, 41 ; John x. 34, quoting Psalm Ixxxii. 6). " The Sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord" (Job i. 6, ii. 1). " Ye are the Sons of the living God" (Hos. i. 10). " To them gave He right to become children of God" (John i. 12). " For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, POEMANDRES. XIII. 93 15. Tat. I was wishing, O Father ! the praise through the hymn, which thou saidst when I had become at the Ogdoad (a) I should hear of the Powers. 1 Hermes. According as the Poemandres prophesied of the Ogdoad (Z>), thou hastest well, Child ! to loose the tabernacle; for thou hast been purified. The Poemandres, the Mind of the Supreme Power (c), hath not delivered to me more than the things written, knowing that from myself I shall be able to understand all things, and to hear those which I wish, and to see all things; and he hath charged me to do things beautiful. Wherefore also all the Powers that are in me sing. 16. Tat. I wish, Father, to hear and desire to understand these things. Hermes. Be still, Child! and now hear the harmonized praise, the hymn of the Eegeneration which I judged not fit so easily to speak forth, unless to thee at the end of the whole. Whence this is not taught but is hidden in silence. Thus then, O Child ! standing in a place open to the sky (d) looking toward the South wind about downgoing of the setting sun bow the knee ; and likewise also at the return towards the sunrise quarter. 2 Be at rest then, O Child! Secret Hymnody. 17. Let all Nature of World receive the hearing of this hymn ! Be opened, O Earth ! Let every vehicle (e) of rain be opened to me. The trees wave ye not ! I am about to hymn The Lord of the creation, and the Universe and The One. Open ye Heavens and Winds be still! (a) \7f\ rqv oy^oa^a,. (b) oy'boettioi. (c) Ty; otvQtvTias, see ch. i. 3, and note there. (d} tit vKettdpip. (e) ftox,*o$. these are Sons of God " (Rom. viii. 14). " Now are we children of God" (1 Johniii. 1, 2). 1 As to the Eighth or Ogdoad, see ch. i. 25, 26. 2 From this and a former passage it has been conjectured that Hermes might have been one of the Therapeutics, whose custom it was to worship thus kneeling and at these periods of the day. 94 HERMES T1USMEGISTUS. Let the immortal circle of The God receive my discourse. For I am about to hymn Him having founded (a) all things, Him having fixed the Earth, and suspended Heaven, and commanded from the Ocean the sweet water to become present (I) unto the earth inhabited and uninhabitable, for the nourishment and use of all men; Him having com- manded fire to shine for every action on gods and men. Let us all together give the praise to Him, The Sublime above the heavens, to the Founder of all Nature. This i& the Eye of the Mind, and may He receive the praise of these my powers. 18. Ye powers that are in me hymn The One and the Universe ; sing along with my will all the powers which are in me. Holy Knowledge, enlightened from thee, through thee hymning the intelligible (c) Light, I rejoice in joy fulness of Mind. All ye powers hymn together with me, and do thou my Temperance (d) hymn; my Jus- tice hymn the just through me. My Communionship (e) hymn the Universe ; through me Truth hymn the Truth ; The Good hymn Good. Life and Light ; from us to you the praise passes. I give thanks to Thee, Father ! Energy of the Powers, I give thanks to Thee, O God ! power of these energies of mine. Thy Word through me hymneth Thee. Through me receive the Universe in speech, rational sacrifice (/). 19. The Powers that are in me shout these things. They hymn Thee the Universe ; they perform Thy Will. Thy Counsel is from Thee ; to Thee the Universe. Ke- ceive from all rational sacrifice. The Universe that is in us, Life preserve ! Light enlighten ! Spirit God ! For The Mind ShepherdethQ/) Thy Word, Spirit-bearing Creator ! (h) 20. Thou art The God. Thy Man shouteth these things through Fire, through Air, through Earth, through Water, through Spirit, throughout the works of Thee. From the (a) xrlaatiToi. (6) VK(x.px,tu. (c) (d) tyxpaLTstct. (e) xoivavia,. (/) TO nav Ao'yp "hQyi*>W 6vaiat.v. (h) 7rutv t uoiTQ(p6pt " POEMANDRES. XIII. 95 Eternity of Thee I have found praise ; and what I seek by that Thy counsel I acquiesce in (a). I know that by Thy will, this the Praise is said. Tat. O Father ! I have placed thee in my World. Hermes. In the intelligible (b) say, O Child ! Tat. In the intelligible, O Father! I am able; from the hymn of thee and this thy praise my Mind hath been enlightened. Moreover I also wish from my own thought to send praise to The God. 21. Hermes. O Child ! not incautiously. Tat. In the Mind, O Father ! What I contemplate I Tat say to Thee, Patriarch of the generative energy (c) ; to God I send rational sacrifices. God ! Thou Father ! Thou the Lord ! Thou the Mind ! Eeceive the rational sacrifices which Thou wishest from me; for Thou being willing, all things are performed. Hermes. Thou, Child ! send an acceptable sacrifice to The God, Father of aU things. But add also, Child r through the Word (d). 1 (a) dvoi'TriTrctvfteti. (&) gv TOJ (c) f /itoipx,oc rqg ytyt(rtovp'ytot$. (rf) S/ot rot/ 1 It is manifest that in this Chapter Hermes mystically yet un-^ mistakeably enunciates the doctrine of the Holy Trinity, " God The / Father," " Thy Word," and The " Spirit God." See CyriU. Alexand. [ contr. Julian. 33, and Suidas (post, Part III.). Cudworth (Intell. Sys- tem, ch. iv., cxxxvi.) writes: " Since all three, Orpheus, Pythagoras, and Plato, travelling into Egypt, were there initiated into the arcane theology of the Egyptians, called Hermaical, it seemeth probable that this doctrine of a Divine Triad (ij ruv rpiav 6&uv Tretpdtioffts) was also part of the arcane theology of the Egyptians." He proceeds further \ to show at length that the Pagan philosophers above named and their followers " called this their Trinity, a Trinity of Gods." This opinion, so far as Greek philosophers and the ancient Egyptians are concerned, has been controverted by Mosheim in the notes to his Latin translation of Cudworth's work and by others, on the ground that this philosophical creed was in a Trinity not of persons, but of attributes. (See Rawlinson's " Egypt," voL i. p. 320). But this ob- jection by no means applies to our Hermes, whose Trinity is that of Three Persons who were in Union, each actively employed in the Creation, in sustaining the cosmical system, and in conducting Man to Heaven. D6 HERMES TRISMEGISTUS. Tat. I give thanks to Thee, Father ! having prayed for me to assent (a) to these things. 22. Hermes. I rejoice, Child ! at thy having gathered in fruit from the Truth, the good things, the immortal productions. Having learnt this from me, announce silence of the Virtue ; to no one, Child, revealing the tra- dition of the Eegeneration, that we may not be reckoned as calumniators. For sufficiently each of us hath medi- tated, I indeed as speaking, and thou as hearing. Men- tally (&) hast thou known thyself and The Father that is ours. CHAPTER XIV. To Asclepius. To le Rightly Wise, (c). 1. Since the son of mine Tat, in thine absence, wished to learn the nature of the Entities, but did not permit me (d) to pass over any, as son and junior but lately arriving at the knowledge of the particulars respecting each one, I was compelled to speak more fully, in order that the theory might become to him easy to follow. But to thee I, having selected the principal heads of the things spoken, have wished to commit them to thee in few words, having interpreted them more mystically, as to one of such an age, and scientific of their nature. 2. If the things apparent have all been generated and are generate, but those generated are generate, not of themselves but by other; but many are the generated, rather all the apparent and all the different and dissimilar, and the generate are generate by other : there is some One Who is doing these things, and He ingenerate and older than those generated. For the generated I say are gene- (a) pot uhe7v. ( & ) votpuf. (c) tv Qpovttv. (d) POEMANDRES. XIV. 97 rate by other ; but of the generated beings it is impossible j that any be older than all, except only the Ingenerate. ^J 3. But this is both Superior and One and Only, really wise as to all things, as not having anything older. For He rules both over the multitude, and the magnitude and difference of things generate, and over the continuity (a) of the making and the energy. Then the generated are visible but He invisible. On account of this He makes, that He may be mvisible (&). He always then is making, wherefore He is invisible. Thus He is worthy to under- stand, and for the understander to wonder at, and the wonderer to bless Himself, having recognised his own kindred Father (c). 4. For what is sweeter than an own kindred Father? ^ Who then is He, and how shall we recognise Him ? Whether is it just to ascribe to Him the appellation of The God or that of The Maker, or that of The Father, or also the three? God indeed because of the Power, Maker because of the energizing, Father because of the Good. For Power is different from things generate, but energy is in this, that all things are generated. Wherefore having cast away the much speaking and vain speaking, we must understand these two, That Generate, and The Maker ; for between these is naught, nor any third thing. 5. Understanding then all things and hearing all things, remember these Two ; and consider these to be the All, placing nothing in ambiguity (cl), neither of those above nor of those below, nor of those divine, nor of those changeable, nor of those in secrecy. For Two are all ^ things ; That Generate, and The Maker, and that the one be separated from the other is impossible ; for neither is it possible for the Maker to be apart from the Generate, nor the Generate apart from the Maker ; for both of them are the very same ; wherefore it cannot be that the one be separated from the other, as neither self from itself. (a) TJi avvt&icc rtjg irQiyotas. (b) "ivoc, dopotrag 19; another reading adopted by Patricius is Ivoc. opetros 17. (c) yvqaiov TT art pot. (rf) ai-ropix. G 98 HERMES TPJSMEGISTUS. 6. For if the Maker is nothing else beside that making, only, simple, incomposite, it is of necessity that He make this same for Himself; since generation is the making by the Maker, and every the generate it is impossible to be generate by itself. Generate must be generated by another. Without Him making, the generated neither is generated, nor is. For the one without the other hath lost its proper nature by deprivation of the other. If then the Entities are acknowledged to be Two, 1 That Generate and That Making, One are they by the Union (a); this indeed preceding but that following. Preceding indeed God The Maker but following That Generate, whatever it may be. 7. And because of the variety of those generate thou shouldst not be scrupulous, fearing to attribute meanness and dishonour to The God. For His Glory is One The Making all things, and this is of The God as it were body, . The Making; but to Him The Maker nothing evil or base is "^ to be imputed. For these are the passions following upon the generation, as rust on the brass and dirt on the body. For neither did the brass worker make the rust, nor those having generated the dirt, nor The God the evil- ness ; but the vicissitude (&) of the generation makes them as it were to effloresce (c) ; and because of this The God made the change, as it were a purgation of the J generation. f 8. Besides indeed to the same limner (d) it is allowed both to make Heaven, and Gods, and earth, and sea, and men, and all the brutes (e), and the inanimate, and the trees ; but to The God is it impossible to make these ? O the much silliness and ignorance, this about The God ! For such sort suffer the most dreadful of all things. For affirming that they both reverence and praise The God, by not ascribing (/) to Him the making of all things they neither know The God, and in addition to the not know- ing, also in the greatest degree are they impious towards (a) TJ5 evatrei. (b) S;a^o;/3j. (c) i^ew&tiv. (d) faypatya. {&) cihoyct. (/) 1 See Cyrill. Alex. Contr. Jul., 63 E, (post, Peart III.). POEMANDRES. XIV. 99 Him, having attributed to Him as passion, contempt (a), ! or impotence, or ignorance, or envy; for if He makes not all things, in pride (b) He makes them not, or not being able, or being ignorant, or grudging, which is impious. 9. For The God has one only Passion, The Good; but The Good is neither proud nor impotent, nor the rest; for this is The God The Good, with Whom is every power of making all things; but everything that is generated hath been generated by The God; that is by The Good and Him able to make all things. 10. But if, how then He makes and how the generate are generated thou wishest to learn it is permitted thee. Behold a very beautiful and very similar figure ; an agri- culturist casting down seed into the earth, sometimes wheat, sometimes barley, sometimes some other of the seeds. Behold the same planting a vine, and an apple, and fig, and the others of the trees. Thus The God indeed in Heaven sows immortality, but in Earth change, but in the Universe life and motion. These things then are not many but few, and easily numbered. For all of them are four, 1 both The God Himself and the Generation in which the Entities (c) consist. 2 (a) VTtpvfyliur. (6) vTrepyQaiyay. (c) roe. o'yr 1 viz., Earth, Air, Fire, Water. 2 See the first line of ch. i., ante. FlNIS POEMANDRES. HERMES TRISMEGISTUS, PAET II. EXCERPTS MADE BY STOB^US (STH OR GTH CENTURY) FROM THE WORKS OF HERMES. L_OF TEUTH. FROM THE THINGS TO TAT (Florilegium, xi. 23; MeineJce, i. 248). " RESPECTING Truth, O Tat ! it is impossible for Man, being an imperfect being, and composed of imperfect mem- bers, and the tabernacle (a) consisting of various bodies and many, to speak with boldness. But what is possible and just that I affirm, that Truth is in eternal (&) bodies only, of which also the bodies themselves are true. Eire is very fire, and nothing else ; Earth very earth itself, and nothing else ; Air itself air, and nothing else ; Water very water, and nothing else ; but these bodies of ours are con- stituted of all these ; for they have of fire, they have also of earth, they have also of water, also of air; and it is neither fire, nor earth, nor water, nor air, nor anything true ; but if, at the beginning, the constitution (c) of us had not Truth, how then can it either see or speak Truth ? but only to understand if God will. All things, then, (a) TO ), but it is not body according to the phantasy of the thing seen. And it looks indeed having eyes, but it sees nothing, and hears nothing at all. And the drawing has indeed all the other things, but they are falsehoods, deceiving the eyes of the beholders, of some indeed supposing to see truth. 1 If, then, we thus understand and see each of these as they are, we both understand and see a true thing ; but if beside the Entity (c), we shall neither understand nor shall know anything true. Is there, then, O Father ! Truth even in the earth ? And thou hast not blindly erred, O Tatius ! Truth is by no means in the earth, nor can be ; but that some of the men understand concerning Truth, to whom The God shall have given the God-discerning (d) power. Thus I under- stand and say, nothing is true on the earth ; all are ph&n- tasies and semblances. I understand and speak true things. To understand and speak true things, then, ought we not to caU this Truth? But, what? Ought one to understand and speak the Entities? Yet there is nothing true upon the earth ? This is true, the not (a) So'ot/ (pavrsfcff/a;. (6) TV) (c) irotpoi TO 6'v. (d) 1 Here is a manifest lacuna. Plato had written (Laws E, 7306;, " Truth is esteemed by Gods as of all good things, by men of all things, of which he about to be born may be immediately partaker, blessed and fortunate from his beginning, so that he live through the most time being true, for he is faithful; but he is faithless by whom false- hood is willingly loveable, to whomsoever unwillingly he is mindless; neither of which is enviable, for every one, both whoso is faithless and foolish, is unloveable." 102 HERMES TRISMEGISTUS. knowing anything true; how also can it possibly be, O Child? Truth is most perfect Virtue; it is the unmixed Good; that neither perturbed (a) by matter, nor encom- passed by body, naked, lucid, irreversible (&), holy, unalter- able, good; but things here, O Child! such as they are, thou seest incapable of receiving (e) this Good, corruptible, subject to passion, dissoluble, reversible, ever inter- changed (d), becoming other from others. What things, then, are not true, even to themselves how ever can they be true ? For everything that is altered is falsehood, not abiding in what it is, but veering about, exhibits to us phantasies, others and others. Is not Man then true, Father ? According to (e) man he is not true, O Child ! For The True is that having its constitution from itself only, and abiding according to it, such as it is. But the Man is constituted of many things, and does not abide according to himself, but is turned and changed, age from age, form from form (/), and this being still in the tabernacle. And many have not known their children, a short time inter- vening, and again children likewise parents. That then which is so changed about as not to be recognised can it be true, Tatius ? Is not that, on the contrary, a false- hood, becoming in various phantasies of changes ? But do you understand to be something true, the abiding and eternal ; but Man is not always, wherefore neither is he a true thing. For the Man is a certain phantasy, but the phantasy would be extremest (g) falsehood. Neither these, then, Father ! the eternal bodies since they change are true? Everything, then, that is gendered and changeable is not true ; but being generate by the forefather, as to the matter it is possible to esteem (Ji) them true. But even these have some falsehood in the change, for nothing not abiding of itself (i) is true. v. (6) (poivou oe-TpsirTOv. (c) (d) tvoe.'h'hoiwf6tvai. (e) x,a,6oTi. (/) Riedv. (g) eixpoToiTOV. (Ji) fa-^fixtyoti. (i) t(p ctvr~. EXCERPTS BY STOB^US. 103 " True, O Father !" " What, then, would anyone call the Sun, alone beyond nil other things not changed, but abiding of itself, Truth ? Wherefore, also, because it alone hath been entrusted (a) with the creation of all things in the world, ruling all things, and making all things, which I both reverence and ftlso salute (6) the truth of it, 1 and after The One and First, 1 acknowledge this creator. "What, then, may be the first Truth, O Father?" " One and only, Tatius ! Him not from matter, Him not in body, the colourless (c), the very figureless (d), the irreversible, the 2 unalterable, the ever-being. But the falsehood, O Child I is corrupted. For corruption hath laid hold of all things that are upon earth, and encom- passes them (e) and the providence of the True will en- compass. For apart from corruption (/) neither can generation be sustained, since upon all generation corrup- tion follows, that it may again be generate ; for it is neces- sity that things generate be generated from those cor- rupted; but it is necessity that things generate be cor- rupted, that the generation of the things being do not stop. Acknowledge this First Creator for the generation of the Entities. Those things, then, generated from cor- ruption, would be (y) falsehoods, because sometimes, in- deed, becoming other things, then other things; for to become the self-same things is impossible ; but that not itself (Ji) how can it be true? One ought, then, to call such things phantasies, 3 Child ! If we rightly designate (b) Trpoaxwu. (c) (g) tin. (h) civro. 1 This is a quotation from Aristotle, Pint, 770: " *a/ Kpo." 2 " The Father of Light, with Whom there can be no variation, neither shadow that is cast by turning " (James i. 17). See Poem- andres iv. 2, and note. 3 Plato writes thus in Sophistes," 263 : " Thought (d,^ ,), opinion (do'!*), and phantasy (> 0tu. (ft) k^ova-iotv. (c) TO oi'hoyov -TTOCV. (d) 6 y\6'/o;, discourse. (e) Kpovottx.. (/) x,a,Tot,vcx.yx.u.( ! ov/ 'O av," Sept.). EXCERPTS BY STOB^US. Ill / IX. OF HERMES FROM THE THINGS TO TAT. (Stobaws, 319, ibid., i. ch. 10; Meineke, i. 84; Patrit., 51). FOR the Matter also, O Child ! hath been generated and was. For Matter is receptacle (a) of generation, but gene- ration mode of energy of The imbegotten and pre-existing God. Receiving then the seed of the generation, it was generated and became variable and received Ideas being made into shapes (b). For there presided over it, being varied, that (energy) fabricating the ideas of the variation (c). The nongeneration (d) of the matter then was shapeless- ness, but the generation the being energized. 1 X. OF HERMES FROM THAT TO TAT. (Stobceus, Physica, 699; Meineke, i. 190; Patrit., p. 4). Asclepius. I, O Child ! both because of the love of Men and of the piety towards The God, first write this. For there can be no piety more righteous than to understand the Entities, and to proffer thanks to the Maker on account of these, which I will never cease performing. (a) dyy&iov. (b) (c) T^O-JTJJJ. (d) 1 Stobaeus (ibid.) remarks that Plato (Timseus, 30) affirmed The Matter to be bodylike, shapeless, formless, figureless, without quality as to its own nature ; but having received the Forms it became as it were nurse, receptacle (cx^ayg/oy) and mother of them. Plato asserts that The Matter simply, as to its entirety, does not change its state (i|*Wra/), but receives all things entering it, but has no original shape whatever. " Three kinds are to be distinguished, the thing generated, that in which it is generated, and that whence, being assimilated, the thing generated is produced." " "We may fittingly compare the thing receiving to a mother, that from whence to a father, and the nature between these to offspring." 112 HERMES TRISMEGISTUS. Tat. What then can any one doing, Father ! if there is nothing truthful here, pass through the life rightly (a). Asdepius. Be pious, O Child! The pious man will philosophize pre-eminently (&) ; for apart from philosophy it is impossible to be pre-eminently pious; but he having learnt what they are, and how they have been arranged, and by whom, and on account of whom, will render thanks for all things to the Creator as to a good father, and useful nurse and faithful guardian; and he proffering thanks will be pious; but the pious man will know both where is The Truth and what that is; and having learnt he will be still more pious. But by no means, Child ! can Soul being in body, having elevated itself to the comprehension (c) of that being good and true, fall away (d) to the opposite ; for Soul having learnt the Forefather of itself exercises vehement (e) love, and oblivion of all the evil things, and cannot any more apostatize from The Good. This, O Child ! let this be end of Piety, attaining to which thou wilt both live rightly, and shalt die happily, the Soul of thine not being ignorant whither it behoves that she should soar up. For this is the only way, Child ! that to Truth, which also l our forefathers journeyed, and having journeyed attained The Good. This way is venerable and smooth, but difficult for Soul to journey being in body. For first it behove th her to war with herself, and to make a great division, and to be prevailed over (/) by the one portion. For the resistance (g) becomes of one against two ; of the one flying, of the others dragging downwards, and there comes to pass much strife and fighting of these with each other ; of the one desiring to fly, of the others hastening to retain. But the victory of both is not alike; for the one hastens to the Good, the others dwell with the evils ; and the one desires to be freed ; but the others love (a) Koe.'hus. (6) oixpa;. (c) Ktvrcihrffyiv. (d) o (e) fall/OV. (/) TT'hSOVtX.TYlD'/JVOtt. (ff) 9] 1 " Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls" (Jer. vi. 16). EXCERPTS BY STOB^EUS. the servitude, 1 and should indeed the two portions be conquered, they remain deserted of themselves (a) and of their ruler; but if the one be vanquished it is led and carried off by the two, being punished by the mode of living here (6). This, Child ! is the guide of the way thither ; for it behoveth thee, Child ! first to anoint the body before the end, and to conquer in the life of striving (c), and having conquered thus, to return. 2 But now, Child ! I will go through under heads, the Entities ; for thou wilt understand the things spoken having remem- bered those which thou hast heard. All the Entities are moved, that not being only is immoveable. Eveiy body changeable, not every body dissoluble. Some of the bodies are dissoluble. Not every animal mortal, not every animal immortal. The dissoluble is corruptible, that abiding im- mutable, the immutable eternal. That ever generate ever also is corrupted ; but that once for all generate is never corrupted, nor becomes anything else. First The God, second the World, third the Man; The World because of the Man, but the Man because of The God. Of the Soul, the sensible (d) indeed is mortal, but the rational immortal. (a) This passage is corrupt. (6) ry I (c) ivocyuviov ftiov. (d) TO ot,i) indeed, but not of the being Body ; but being changed to other it has the condition of the other; for the body that was body continues Body, but the quality of disposition (c) does not continue ; the Body then according to disposition is changed. Incorporeal then the place, the time, and the natural motion. But each of these pos- sesses its peculiar property; but property of the Place is receptivity (d), of Time interval and number, of Nature motion, of Harmony friendship, of Body change ; but pro- perty of Soul the Intelligence according to Essence. XII. OF HERMES FROM THE THINGS TO TAT. (Stobceus, Physica, 726 ; Meineke, i. 198). Tat. Rightly hast thou explained these things, O Father! but further teach me these. For thou saidest somewhere that the Science and the Art are the energy of the rational (e) ; but now thou sayest the irrational ani- mals are and are called irrational through deprivation of the rational ; it is plain there is necessity according to this the account, that the irrational animals do not partake of science (/), neither of art, through the being deprived of the rational. (a) ffwyy!/ix,y)v o/X/tba,x,Ttx,dt,. (6) *#0o?ux>j. (c) xctdon. (d) VTTOTrgTTTJiJfcOTflt. (e) . (e) f%vjpeti/e rov v^etro;. (/) (#) &TfAo$. (h) ffvityhQi. (i) 1 See Poemandres, ch. i. 5, 11, and ch. iii. 2. 2 See Gen. ii. 6V EXCERPTS BY STOB^US. 123 to the encompassing Spirit. This falling into the matrix is not quiescent (a) in the seed ; and not being quiescent changes the seed, and being changed it possesses increase and magnitude. But upon the magnitude an image of figure is impressed (&) and it is figured ; and the form is carried (c) upon the figure, through which that made into image is made into image (d). Since however the Spirit had not in the womb the vital motion but the ferment- ing (e), Harmony harmonized this also, being receptacle of the intellectual life. But this is simple and unchangeable, by no means ever desisting from this immutability. But that in the womb is brought forth (/) in numbers and de- livered, and breaks (g) into the outer air, and being very near the Soul is associated with it, not according to the congenerate association (A), but according to that fated ; for there is no love in it to be together with body. Through this according to Fate, it affords to that generated intel- lectual motion, and the intelligent Essence of its life ; for it creeps into it along with the spirit, and moves it vitally. XIV. OF HERMES FROM THOSE TO AMMON TO TAT. (Stobceus, Physica, 745 ; Meineke, i. 204). AND the Lord indeed and Creator of all the eternal Bodies, O Tat! having once made hath not made any further, nor does make. For having delivered up these things to themselves and united them to each other He let them go to be borne (i) on, wanting in nothing as eternal. If they want anything, they will want of one another, but of no kind of importation (k) of that from (a) viptf&ii. (6) I'Trta'xoiTot.i. (c) o (d) ftQahoiroitiToci. (e) fipotortzqv. (/) (cj) aLyti. (Jl) awy/vix,qy oizsioTYirot. (i) , Kpovos, and "HX/O; Greek and Egyptian Deities to whom no allusion is made in the other writings of our author, which are also manifestly inconsistent with any belief in the existence of such beings.] XX. OF HERMES (Stolceiis, Ethica, Lib. ii., 358; Meiwke, Vol. ii., p. 100. It is not stated from what woi*k of Hermes this is taken). THERE is then Essence and Eeason and Understanding and Thought. Both Opinion and Sense are referred to (a) the Thought, but the Reason goes to the Essence, but the Understanding goes by itself. But the Understanding is interwoven (6) with the Thought; but permeating one another (c) they become one Form [or Idea], and that is that of the Soul. But Opinion and Sense are referred to the Thought of the same ; but these do not remain at the same ; whence they both exceed and fall short and differ with Itself (d). Worse indeed it becomes when drawn away from the Thought; but when it accompanies and is obedient, it holds communion with the intellectual Eeason through the Sciences. But we have the choos- ing. For the choosing the superior is with us, and like- wise the worse at our will. 1 For choice being made of the evils brings us near to the corporeal nature : through this Fate tyrannizes over the chooser (e). When then the corporeal Essence in us, the intellectual Eeason, is self-determinate (/), and this [Essence] holds on always according to this and in such wise, through this Fate (a) Qiptrai. (&) (c) lA^oVra B<