UC-NRLF GIFT OF < ^ . *f*t*- f STATEMENT OF A PROPER MILITARY POLICY FOR THE UNITED STATES PREPARED BY THE WAR COLLEGE DIVISION, GENERAL STAFF 'cOrfPS IN COMPLIANCE WITH INSTRUCTIONS OF THE pECRETARY OF WAR MARCH, 1915 W. C. D. 9053-90 ARMY WAR COLLEGE SEPTEMBER 1915 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1916 Al #, WAR DEPARTMENT, OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF STAFF, WAR COLLEGE DIVISION, Washington, September 11, 1915. Memorandum for the Chief of Staff: Subject: Military policy. 1. Memorandums from your office, dated March 11 and March 17, 1915, directed the War College Division to make a complete and ex- haustive study of a proper military policy for the U.QKed States, aiid^ to prepare a clearly and succinctly expressed statement of the policy, basing it, in a general way, upon the " Keport on tfie Organization o?> the Land Forces of the United States, 1912," "eliminating every- thing that is not necessary for the easy and quick comprehension of the military policy, and adding anything which may be necessary to afford such comprehension." 2. The following extract from the memorandum of March 17, 1915, gives the subjects which the " statement " was to cover, viz : The substance of this policy will, therefore, be a clearly and succinctly ex- pressed statement, with the reasons therefor, of the recommended strength and organization of- I. (a) The Regular Army; (&) The Organized Militia. This should be followed by II. A careful study of the question of a reserve for both the Regular Army and the Organized Militia and, if possible to agree upon it, a plan for the forma- tion of such reserves. III. The Volunteers: Their organization and relation to the Regular Army and the Organized Militia. IV. Reserve material and supplies which should be available and which can not be promptly obtained if delayed till the outbreak of war. The Secretary of War is of the opinion that a statement which shall contain everything that is pertinent to the foregoing subjects will inform Congress of all the essential things that the best judgment of the War Department thinks it is justified in asking Congress to provide in peace and to be prepared to provide in war. These things, being such as commend themselves to the general mili- tary intelligence (if they do not so commend themselves there can be no policy such as is now aimed at), may be assumed to be those that will be asked for by succeeding administrations of the War Department at least, they will indicate the general line of development to be pursued. Such a statement will constitute what he has in mind as a comprehensive military policy. There are many other things that will from time to time be asked of Congress or, when authority exists for it, that will be done without asking legislation. Such things may be requests for appropriations to build new posts in view of the abandoning of others ; the concentration of the Army in a smaller number of posts in definite areas of the country ; projects for promotion, retirement, etc. ; plans for training the Army and the militia, etc. Such things have no part in the statement of a general military policy which the Secretary of War now desires to have prepared, and in order to save time m 6673-J7 IV A PROPER MILITARY POLICY FOR THE UNITED STATES. and labor and to concentrate attention upon that which is essential, he desires any such extraneous matter to be eliminated from the study which he has directed. 3. Following these lines the accompanying " Statement of a Proper Military Policy for the United States " was prepared. 4. It is proposed to supplement this statement later with brochures on such subjects as require more detailed discussion than would be appropriate herein. M. M. MACOMB, Brigadier General, Chief of War College Division. CONTENTS. Page. MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF in INTRODUCTION , . 1 THE MILITARY PROBLEM CONFRONTING THE UNITED STATES 1 The evolution of national military policies 1 Our abiding national policies 2 Coordinate relationship of Army and Navy 2 Coordinate relationship of statesman and soldier 3 Preparedness of the world powers for oversea expeditions 3 Statement of the military problem 5 I. THE REGULAR ARMY 5 GENERAL FUNCTIONS OF THE REGULAR ARMY 5 MOBILE AND COAST ARTILLERY TROOPS AND THEIR FUNCTIONS... 6 RELATION BETWEEN HOME AND, OVERSEA GARRISONS 7 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS OF OVERSEA SERVICE 7 The Philippines. 7 Oahu, Hawaiian Islands 8 The Panama Canal 8 Guantariamo 9 Alaska 9 Porto Rico 9 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS OF HOME SERVICE 9 General distribution of Coast Artillery troops in fortified areas. . . 9 General distribution of mobile troops in strategic areas 9 Puget Sound area 10 California area '. 10 Atlantic area 10 Middle West area 11 NECESSARY STRENGTH OF MOBILE TROOPS FOR OVERSEA SERVICE. 11 The Philippines 11 Oahu 11 Panama 11 Guantanamo 11 Alaska 12 Porto Rico 12 Tabular statement 12 NECESSARY STRENGTH OF MOBILE TROOPS FOR HOME SERVICE 12 Tabular statement showing distribution of administrative units of mobile troops m strategic areas 12 Formation of higher tactical units and their distribution in stra- tegic areas 13 NECESSARY STRENGTH OF COAST ARTILLERY TROOPS REQUIRED FOR SERVICE OVERSEAS AND AT HOME 13 TOTAL STRENGTH OF THE REGULAR TROOPS REQUIRED FOR ALL SERVICES 13 Organization 14 II. THE ORGANIZED MILITIA 15 Constitutional functions 15 Some uses a? a Federal force 15 Limitations 15 Recommendations 16 III. RESERVES 16 The Regular Reserve 16 Citizen soldiers 17 Reserve officers 17 IV. THE VOLUNTEERS 17 V. RESERVE MATERIEL AND SUPPLIES 18 List of Brochures . . 22 A PROPER MILITARY POLICY FOR THE UNITED STATES. INTRODUCTION. ./, ; - - > V i^ i , J THE MILITARY PROBLEM CONFRONTING THE UNITED STATES. 1. The evolution of national military policies. National policies are evolved and are expanded as the Nation grows. They reflect the national sense of responsibility and also the national ambitions. They constitute the doctrine underlying acts of statesmanship and diplomacy. A nation's military policy is the national doctrine of self-preservation. The world is never without virile, capable, and progressive nations, the circumstances of whose development have imbued them with the belief that their vital interests demand an active aggressive policy. They are forced to resort to universal service in the effort to fulfill, at any cost, what they conceive to be their destiny. In the United States the development of the Nation has proceeded under an environment so favorable that there is no well-defined public opinion in regard to what constitutes an ade- quate military policy. Heretofore isolation, combined with the neces- sity of preserving the balance of power, has been a sufficient guaranty against strong hostile expeditions from Europe or Asia. The safe- guard of isolation no longer exists. The oceans, once barriers, are now easy avenues of approach by reason of the number, speed, and carrying capacity of ocean-going vessels. The increasing radii of action of the submarine, the aeroplane, and wireless telegraphy all supplement ocean transport in placing both our Atlantic and Pacific coasts within the sphere of hostile activities of oversea nations. The great mass of the public does not yet realize the effect of these changed conditions upon pur scheme of defense. Another thing that militates against the evolution of a sound military policy for our country is the erroneous conclusion drawn by the people from our past experiences in war. In developing such a policy victory is often a less trustworthy guide than defeat. We have been plunged into many wars and have ultimately emerged successfully from each of them. The general public points to these experiences as an indication that our military policy has been and still continues to be sound. That this is not really the belief of those in authority is shown by the fact that each war of importance has been followed by an official investigation of our military system and the policy under which it operated. The reports of these investiga- tions give a startling picture of faulty leadership, needless waste of lives and property, costly overhead charges augumented by payment 2 A PBOPEB MILITARY POLICY FOR THE UNITED STATES. of bounties to keep up voluntary enlistments, undue prolongations of all these wars, and finally reckless expenditure of public funds for continuing pensions. These documents supply convincing proofs that all such shortcomings have been due entirely to a lack of ade- quate preparation for war in time of peace. But we have not yet learned our lesson. It has never been driven home by the bitterness of defeat. TVe have never known a Jena or a Sedan. At no stage of our national life have we been brought face to face with the armed strength of a great world power free to land sufficient forces to gain a foothold at any, desired portion of our coasts. That we have to -seiite extVTittfeii;tliis danger is evidenced by our efforts to provide a naVy as' a 1 first Tine of, defense and to supplement it with the necessary :harbar;!rpttfficatipns;:but we have not yet realized that^our ultimate ^safeguard 4s 4 till "adequate and well-organized mobile* land force. Experience in war has shown the need of these three elements but the public has not yet demanded that they be perfected, coordinated, and combined in one harmonious system of national defence. Not until this has been accomplished will a proper military policy for the United States be adopted. 2. Our abiding national policies. The majority of our people have always believed in asserting their own rights and in respecting those of others. They desire that the cause of right should prevail and that lawlessness should be crushed out. To live up to these high ideals imposes upon us new duties as a world power; duties that require something more positive than a policy of mere passive defense. In addition, there are two underlying and abiding national policies whose maintenance we must consider as necessary to our national life. These are the " Monroe doctrine " and the policy of avoiding " entan- gling alliances." They are distinctive and affect our international relations in a definite manner. In addition, policies may develop in the future as a result of international relations with respect to trade conditions. A general consideration of our responsibilities as a nation and of our geographical position indicates that the maintenance of our abiding policies and interests at home and abroad involves problems of defense measures both on land and on sea. The solution of the general problem of national defense must be sought in the provision of adequate land and sea forces and a consideration of their co- ordinate relationship. 3. Coordinate relationship of Army and Nary. Upon the Navy devolves the solution of the problem of securing and maintaining control of the sea. To accomplish this it must be free to take the offensive promptly that is. to seek out and defeat the enemy fleet. The use of any part of the high-sea fleet for local defense defeats the chief object of the Xavy and is a misuse of naval power. A fleet de- feated at sea and undefended by an adequate army is powerless either to prevent invasion or even its own ultimate destruction by combined hostile land and naval forces. In illustration compare the cases of the Spanish fleet at Santiago and the Russian fleet at Port Arthur with the present example of the German. Austrian, and Turkish fleets under the protection of land forces. Upon the Army devolves the task of gaining and maintaining on shore the ascendency over hostile land and naval operations. To A PROPER MILITARY POLICY FOR THE UNITED STATES. 3 accomplish this it must be able to seek out promptly and to defeat, capture, or destroy the invader wherever he may attempt either to secure a footing upon our territory or to enter the waters of our har- bors with the object of threatening the destruction of the seaport or of a fleet driven to seek refuge or repair therein. The problems involved in operations against hostile land forces are complex and include only as an incident the protection of harbor defenses on the land side. The problems of harbor defense against attack from the sea are simple and passive in their nature. 4. Coordinate relationship of statesman and soldier. In our coun- try public opinion estimates the situation, statecraft shapes the policy, while the duty of executing it devolves upon the military and naval departments. Such a doctrine is sound in direct proportion to its success in pro- ducing a military system capable of developing fighting power suffi- cient to meet any given national emergency, at the proper time, sup- ported by all the resources, technical and economic, of the country, in a word preparedness. All the other world powers of to-day have realized the necessity of maintaining highly trained and organized military and naval forces in time of peace, and all, or nearly all, are allied in powerful coalitions. Without superiority on the sea or an adequate land force there is nothing to prevent any hostile power or coalition of powers from landing on our shores such part of its trained and disciplined troops as its available transports can carry. The time required is limited only by the average speed of its vessels and the delay necessarily consumed in embarking and disembarking. In order that the American people can intelligently decide on a doctrine of preparedness which shall constitute the military policy of the United States, and that Congress and the Executive may be able to carry out their decision, information concerning the military strength of other great nations and shipping available for transport purposes must be clearly set forth. The work of the statesman and of the soldier and sailor are there- fore coordinate; where the first leaves off the others take hold. 5. Preparedness of the world powers for oversea expeditions. Control of the sea having been once gained by our adversary or adversaries, there is nothing to prevent them from dispatching an oversea expedition against us. In order to form an idea of the mobile force we should have ready to resist it an estimate must first be made of the approximate number of troops that other nations might reasonably be expected to transport and of the time required to land them on our coasts. The number of thoroughly trained and organized troops an enemy can bring in the first and succeeding expeditions under such an assumption is a function of (a) The size of the enemy's army, and ( ~b ) The number, size, and speed of the vessels of the enemy's mer- chant marine that can be used as transports. Should our enemy be a nation in arms that is, one in which all or nearly all of the male inhabitants of suitable physique are given a minimum of two years' training with the colors in time of peace (and this is true of all world powers except ourselves and England), it is 3608516 2 4 A PROPER MILITARY POLICY FOR THE UNITED STATES. evident that the size of the first expedition and succeeding expeditions would be limited only by the number of vessels in the transport fleets. It also follows that as the capacity and number of steamers in the merchant marine of any nation or group of nations increase in the future, the number of trained soldiers which such nation could send in such expedition will also increase, and our trained forces should be correspondingly augmented. What the conditions were in August, 1914, is shown in the follow- ing table, which may be regarded as a reasonable estimate: Preparedness of the great powers for over-sea expeditions. Nation. Strength of army. 3 Tonnage available of ships with capacity over First expe- dition using 50 per cent of tonnage given. Second expe- dition using 75 per cent of tonnage given. Time needed to Load and cross ocean with first expe- di- tion. Re- turn, load, and re- cross with sec- ond T- tion. ! ' 3,000 2,000 tons, i tons. 1,000 tons. Men. An- imals. Men. An- imals. Austria-Hungary . . France 4,320,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 1695.000 2,600,000 2,212,000 5,000,000 762,756 1,705,931 3,569,9624,018,185 13, 000, 000 i 72,000 160,931 4 387,000 170,000 91,000 95, 745 37, 630 14,000 32, 186 81, 270 90,000 13, 650 24, 416 7,940 108,000 243,295 440,000 21,600 48,279 ^94,600 Days. 20.7 15.8 15.8 14.0 18.3 22.5 20.5 Days. 40.4 30.0 30.8 27.0 35.0 41.0 40.0 Germany Great Britain Italy 1,065,321 136,000 142,622 66, 444 20,475 36,623 11,918 21,013,985 Russia 428 019 I i 240,500 territorials. * Japanese field regulations indicate the intention to use steamers of 1 ,000 tons; for this reason and because of the large amount of steamers between 10 and 12 knots speed, all Japanese steamers over 10 knots speed and a thousand tons gross have been considered. s Fifty per cent has been assumed as the figure representing the amount of shipping in or within call of home ports at outbreak of war. Using no ships less than 3,000 tons. NOTE. The allowance prescribed in our Field Service Regulations of 3 tons per man and 8 tons per animal for ships over 5,000 tons and 4 tons per man and 10 tons per animal for vessels under 5,000 tons has been used in estimating the capacity of ships, except where the regulations of any country prescribe a different allowance. These allowances include rations, water, forage, etc., for the voyage and a margin (or three months' reserve supplies. The tonnage allowance covers men, animals, and" all accessories and is sufficient to provide for vehicles (including guns). Fighting power is the result of organization, training, and equipment backed by the resources of the country. Available shipping is a matter of commercial statistics. The quality, organization, and efficiency of these troops, except those of Japan, which demonstrated their excellence in the Russo- Japanese War, are now undergoing a supreme test of military strength on land and sea. This test by the ordeal of battle is visibly demonstrating their organization, their fighting power, and the rate at which each is capable of developing and maintaining its military strength. In addition, where certain nations have transported troops by sea their capabilities in this respect have to some extent been shown. This evidence, produced under conditions of actual warfare, pre- sents an example of the resultant efficiency of any nation that has de- veloped a sound military policy ; the soundest policy being the one which insures a successful termination of the war in the shortest time. A PROPER MILITARY POLICY FOR THE UNITED STATES. 5 6. Statement of the military problem. From what has been stated, we are forced to the conclusion that we must be prepared to resist a combined land and sea operation of formidable strength. Our prin- cipal coast cities and important harbors have already been protected by harbor defenses which, by passive method alone, can deny to an enemy the use of these localities as. bases for such expeditions. The enemy being unable to gain a foothold in any of these fortified areas by direct naval attack will therefore be forced to find some suit- able place on the coast from which land operations can be conducted both against the important coast cities and the rich commercial cen- ters in the interior. Long stretches of coast line between the fortified places lie open to the enemy. The only reasonable way in which these localities can be defended is by providing a mobile land force of suffi- cient strength, so located that it may be thrown in at threatened points at the proper time. It has just been shown what the strength of these expeditions might be, as well as the time required for any one of them to develop its whole effective force. Hence it can be seen, when we take into con- sideration the possible two months' delay provided by the Navy, that our system should be able to furnish 500,000 trained and organized mobile troops at the outbreak of the war and to have at least 500,000 more available within 90 days thereafter. Here, however, it must be pointed out that two expeditions alone will provide a force large enough to cope with our 1,000,000 mobile troops, and consequently we must at the outbreak of hostilities provide the system to raise and train, in addition, at least 500,000 troops to replace the losses and wastage in personnel incident to war. To provide this organized land force is the military problem before us for solution. I. THE BEGULAB ARMY. GENERAL FUNCTIONS OF THE REGULAR ARMY. 7. In the endeavor to reach a just conclusion as to the strength and organization of a Kegular Army, adequate to play its part in our national defense, it must not be forgotten that this defense is a joint problem requiring for its correct solution the united efforts of both Army and Navy, and that the ultimate strength of the greater war army is dependent to a considerable extent upon the part to be played by the fleet. It is therefore assumed in this discussion that the Navy is preparing to place and maintain in the Pacific, when the occasion requires, a force superior to that of any oriental nation, and, in the Atlantic, one second only to that of the greatest European naval power. The Regular Army is the peace nucleus of the greater war army of the Nation. Its strength and organization should be determined not only by its relation to the larger force but by its own peace and war functions. It must be prepared at all times to meet sudden and special emergencies, which can not be met by the army of citizen soldiers. Its units must be the models for the organization and train- ing of those of the great war army. Some of the functions of the Regular Army are : (a) To furnish the entire strength of our garrisons outside of the United States proper both in peace and war. 6 A PROPER MILITARY POLICY FOR THE UNITED STATES. (b) To garrison our harbor defenses within the United States proper in time of peace. (