B ^ iiD 124 ENGLISH LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA. -.4 i ROSCIUS ANGLICANUS, OR, AN HISTORICAL REVIEW OF THE STAGE From 1660 to 1706, BY JOHN DOWNES. A Facsimile Reprint of the Rare Original of 1708. WITH AN HISTORICAL PREFACE BY JOSEPH KNIGHT. ON: J. W. JARVIS & SON, 28, KING WILLIAM STREET, STRAND. 1886. Biaiiii Ef^GL, UB. FD. Ni. ONE HUNDRED AND THIRTY-FIVE COPIES ARE PRINTED OF THIS BOOK, of which 125 COPIES ONLY ARE FOR SALE. 5 „ For the British Museum and Public Libraries. S „ For Private Distribution. 135 All of which are Numbered and Signed. PREFACE BY THE EDITOR. "pOR his knowledge of the stage before Colley Gibber began his matchless, if not always trustworthy Apo- logy, the student of theatrical history is indebted to comparatively few books. In Pepys's Memoirs appetising glimpses into the performances of Restoration dramas are afforded, and more or less curious information con- cerning play-houses, actors, and authors, in Tudor and Stuart times is to be gleaned in the plays, tracts, and prologues of writers from Nash and Heywood, to Dave- nant, Dryden, and Flecknoe, from the Histrio-mastix of Prynne, 1633, and from Wright's Historia Histrionica, 1699. The one work, however, from whichji history of the stage, from the period of the Restoratfon to the beginning of the eighteenth century can be obtained, is the Roscius Anglicanus of John Downes, now for the first time reprinted in its original shape. The first edi- tion of this work is, as collectors know, so scarce that a copy of it can rarely be obtained. It was spoken of as "extremely scarce" by Waldron, who in 1789 — from the same copy from which the present facsimile is taken — printed an edition, itself far from common, with the ad- dition of notes by Thomas Davies, the bookseller, the author of the Life of Garrick, and of Dramatic Miscel- lanies, and by himself. In the sale catalogue of the library of Henderson, the VI EDITOR S PREFACE. actor, the coj)y from which both reprints are taken was announced. The volume, according to Waldron, was " claimed as the property of the Hon. Mr. {sic) Byng," by whom it had been lent to Henderson, and who had purchased it from the widow of Davies. John Downes was, as his address to the reader states, book-keeper and prompter to the theatre in Lincoln's Inn Fields, from its opening in 1662, until October, 1706. By a quotation from "The Spanish Tragedy, or Hieronimo is Mad Again," by Thomas Kyd, Waldron shews that book-keeper means what Ben Johson in the Introduction to "Cynthia's Revels," calls the book-holder, the individual who holds or keeps the manuscript or book of the play. Of the life of Downes little, except what he himself tells us, is known. With many defects as a chronicler, springing in part from the entire absence of any literary gift, but in a still higher degree from his not unnatural forgetfulness that future generations might be greatly concerned, with matters which to him, appeared too trivial for mention, Downes supplies the most trust- worthy information we possess concerning the stage during the period when its licence was greatest, and when its changes and transmutations were most important. To mention two things only ; it is during the period covered by the review of Downes, that the use of scenery began, and that women first appeared regularly on the stage as the exponents of feminine characters. That there were actresses, of a sort, in classical times is known, and that English ladies of rank took part from an early time, in dramatic entertainments, revels at Court, and the like has been shown. No English woman appeared, however, upon a public stage until 1656, and then, as will be shown, she was not allowed to speak, but only to sing. EDITORS PREFACE. VU In Brome's " Court-Beggar," acted at the Cock-pit, 1632, are the words " Women actors now grow in request" This has been supposed to indicate that female cha- racters in English plays had then been assigned to women. It more probably refers to the fact stated by Prynne, that " not long since " (Michaelmas, 1629), '' they had French- women Actors in a play personated in Blacke-friers Play-house, to which there was great resort." * According to a letter from one Thomas Brande, 8th Nov., 1629, these Frenchwomen were " hissed, hooted, and pippen pelted from the stage." In "The Ball" of Shirley and Chapman, 1639, Jack Freshwater, a pretended traveller, asserts that in Paris "the women are the best actors, they play their own parts, a thing much desired in England by some ladies, inns o' court gentlemen, and others."t It may safely then, be assumed that the women whose performances Downes chronicles, were the first English actresses who appeared upon the stage to speak the words of a play. In Davenant's patent it is expressly said, that " Whereas the women's parts in plays have hitherto been acted by men in the habits of women, at which some have taken offence, we do permit and give leave for the time to come that all womens parts be acted by women. "J The discussion of the question, abundantly ventilated, whether the women mentioned by classical writers as appearing on the stage, were actresses or dancers, is outside the present subject. * Histrio-mastix, p. 215. + Act v., Sc, i. % Given in " The State of the Case between the Lord Chamberlain of his Majesty's Household, and Sir Richard Steele, as Represented by that Knight," London, 1720. Viil EDITOR S PREFACE. Concerning the actresses who appeared in the comedies of the Restoration, Downes supplies particulars which are always interesting, and sometimes not a little naive. He chronicles moreover (p. 46), the engagement of foreign women : Madam Sublini, Margarita Delpine, Maria Gallia, and others ; and states that Madam Delpine had by modest computation, got " by the Stage and Gentry, above T 0,000 guineas," an almost incredible sum for those days. So early then as the seventeenth century, foreign artists had found London a happy hunting ground. Freshwater, in " The Ball," whom I have previously quoted, says, in words which even then, 1639, had special significance, and were likely to " draw down the house," " You must encourage strangers while you live : it is the character of our nation, we are famous for de- jecting our own countrymen."* He is in this case re- ferring to portrait painters and not to actors, but the analogy between the two holds good. A just but a timid critic, Downes seldom warms into eloquence or poetry except, when dealing with women. He describes how the famous Mrs. Barry, when she acted Monimia (in "The Orphan "), Belvidera (in " Ven- ice Preserved"), and Isabella (in "The Fatal Marriage"), "forced tears from the eyes of her auilitory, especially those who have any sense of pity for the distressed ; " while of the potent and magnetick charm " of Mrs. Braccginlle in "performing a song" in Crowne's ''Justice Busy," he states, with unwonted enthusiam, that it " caus'd the stones of the streets to fly into men's faces," a miracle a little diftjcult of comprehension, and more satisfactory to hear of than to experience Of the Ixau sexe in general he is indeed an admirer, his duties as prompter or book • Act iii., Sc. iii. EDITORS PREFACE. IX holder being not too onerous to incapacitate him for noticing the " daily charming presence " of the ladies of the Court at the performance of Lee's " Theodosius, or the Force of Love." Mrs, Long, too, in the " Woman made a Justice," is credited with acting the Justice " charmingly," and for Mrs. Davies the same epithet is reserved. Downes is indeed our authority for the asser- tion that in the part of Celia, a shepherdess (should be Celania, the Jailor's daughter), in " The Rivals," an alteration by Sir William Davenant of " The Two Noble Kinsmen," in giving the well-known song, " My Lodg- ng is on the cold ground," Mrs. Davies *' perform'd that so charmingly, that not long after, it raised her from the cold ground to a bed royal." The statement is correct. Genest, however, in his " Account of the English stage " is at the pains to con« tradict it. "Charles the 2nd," says Genest, "did not take Mrs. Davis into keeping." This, for a writer so careful as Genest, is a sad blunder. Never indeed, was a worse shot. Pepys supplies abundant particulars concerning the royal favourite, and the jealousies she caused. First he depicts little Miss Davis, March 7th, 166J, dancing a jigg, which was "infinitely beyond the other," the other being Nell Gwyn. He then, Jan. 14th, i66|, tells how the King has given her a ring of ;;^7oo, and has " furnished a house in Suffolke-street, most richly for her." On the 31st May, 1668, he describes how the Queen would not stay to see the jigg Mrs. Davis had to dance, " which most people do think was out of dis- pleasure at her being the King's mistress, that she could not bear it," and depicts my Lady Castlemaine " mightily out of request," and "mighty melancholy and discon- tented." One more picture coloured to the life, the old gossip presents, in Dec. 21st of the same year. After X editor's preface. telling how his wife appeared "as pretty as any of them " in the theatre, and how the King and the Duke of York " minded him, and smiled at him," he continues, " But it vexed me to see Moll Davis in the box over the King's and my Lady Castlemaine, look down upon the King, and he up to her; and so did my Lady Castlemaine once, to see who it was ; but when she saw Moll Davis, she looked like fire ; which troubled me." Genest can indeed, never have heard the story pre- served by Grainger in a note to his Biographical History of England, of the rivalry between Moll Davies and Nell Gwynn. " It would be too indelicate to mention the particular consequences of the jalap, which was given to Moll Davies at supper by Nell Gwynn, who knew that she was to lie the same night with the King. It is sufficient to hint at the violence of its operation, and the disastrous effects : such effects as the ancients would have attributed to .\nteros, a malignant deity, and the avowed enemy of Cupid."* J According to Pepys, Moll Davies was an illegitimate daughter of Colonel Howard, my Lord Berkshire, who "got her for the King." The result of this royal intrigue wns a daughter, named Mary Tudor, married in 1687 to the son of .^ir Francis Ratcliffe, who became Earl of Derwentwater. The unfortunate Earl who perished on Tower Hill was the son of this Mary Tudor, whose death is thus noticed in the Historical Register for 1726, Vol. n. " 1726, Nov. 5. — Dy'd at Paris, aged 53 years, or thereabouts. The Ladv Mary Tudor, Countess of Derwentwater, relict of Francis Ratcliffe, second Earl of Derwentwater, who had issue by her — three sons and one dnughter — viz. : J.iniep, who succeeded his father in the Earldom, and was beheaded for high treason, on • Vol. iv., p. 1S7. rd. 1775 editor's preface. xi Tower Hill, in 17 16; Francis, and Charles, and the Lady Mary Tudor. She was twice marry'd after the death of the Earl, her first husband, viz. : first to Henry Grahame, Esq, ; and after his decease to Rooke, Esq., son of Brigadier-General Rooke." In " Epigrams of all sorts made at Divers Times, on Severall Occasions," by Richard Flecknoe, London, 1670, p. 43, is an "epigram" to Mrs. Davies on her excellent dancing. This commences " Dear Mis,"' and is noteworthy as an exceptionally early instance of addressing an unmarried woman as Miss, without, it may be supposed, intending to cast an imputation upon her morals, such as at that time the use of the word sometimes involved. It has been supposed by Waldron, that the elevation to the "bed royal" justified Downes in bestowing the title of Madame instead of that of Mrs. ; Downes how- ever, does not confine the tide to the recipients of royal homage, since he confers it on Mrs. Bracegirdle, who had no such qualification. At page 35, Downes mentioning the losses undergone by the company previous to 1673, states of Mrs. Daven- port, Mrs. Davies, and Mrs. Jennings, in the peculiar phraseology he affects, that they " by force of love, were erept the stage." There seems every reason to believe that Mrs. Davenport was the heroine of an adventure which Davies in his notes to the " Roscius Anglicanus" and again in his " Dramatic Miscellanies " (iii. 277 — 9), assigns to Mrs. Marshall. This adventure is told in " Grammont's Memoirs," by Mrs. Hobart, of the Earl of Oxford and the "handsome, gi-aceful actress, belonging to the duke's theatre, who performed to perfection, particularly the part of Roxana, in a very fashionable new play, insomuch that xii editor's preface. she ever after retained that name."* According to this story, the Earl who was madly in love with the actress, and was unable by any protestations or promises of marriage to overcome her resistance, came to her lodgings attended by a clergyman and a witness, and went solemnly through the wedding ceremony. Upon investigation, it proved that " the pretended priest was one of my lord's trmnpeters, and the witness his kettle-drummer." t Appeals to Charles I. to avenge her outraged honour upon the part of the woman, thus ill-treated by the High and Mighty Prince, Aubrey de Vera, Knight of the Garter, Colonel of the Royal Regiment of Life Guards, and possessor then, or sub- sequently, of many offices of honour, trust and emoluments, were vain ; no redress was obtained, and the victim was ultimately compelled to accept a pension of a thousand crowns, or according to Curll's History of the Stage, o{^s°°-+ Curll departs in many particulars from the story narrated by Hamilton, and rightly calls the heroine of the adventure Roxalana instead of Roxana. As, however, he is the worst authority conceivable, his statements are entitled to no more credit than is the assertion of Walpole, that the actress in question was a Mrs. Rarker, of whose existence no trace is preserved. Mrs. Marshall was the original Roxana of Lee's " Rival Queens," produced at the Theatre Royal in 1677, and the story was consc(iucntly, attributed to her. Malone, and after him Genest,§ suppose however, the heroine to have been Mrs. Davenport, who acted Roxalana in " The * Graminont's Memoirs, Kd. IJohii, p. 230. + Ibia., p. 231. t p. 35. § Account of the Stajjc, Vol. i., p. 49. EDITORS PREFACE. XIU Siege of Rhodes," of Davenant, at the Lincoln's Inn Fields Theatre in 1661 ; and a second Roxalana in the "Mustapha," of Lord Orrery, at the same house in 1663, The actress is stated in the translation of Grammont's Memoirs to have belonged to the Duke's company, and the play is therein described as "a very fashionable new play." Reference to the original French, however, shows that the last phrase is an unwarranted addition of the translator. The words of Hamilton, in the first edition (Cologne chez Pierre Marteau), 17 13, with the original spelling and italics are as follows : Le Comte d'Oxford devint amoureux d'une Comedienne de la Troiipe du Duc^ belle, gracieuse, & qui jouoit dans la perfection. Le Rtle de Roxelane, dans une Piece Nouvelle I'avoit niise en Vogue, le nom lui en ^toit rest^. — p. 295. In consequence of not having turned to the original, Genest charges the author of the Memoirs with having called the actress Roxana, instead of Roxal- ana. Hamilton, as is seen, does no such thing. The name he gives is Roxelane, and the error is wholly due to the translator. That the actress in question was Mrs. Davenport, as surmised by Malone and Genest, and not Mrs. Marshall, as stated by Davies in his notes to Downes, and by Curll in his History of the Stage ; is conclusively shewn by Pepys, who under the date of May 20th, 1662, has the words : " My wife and I by coach to the opera, and there saw the second part of ' the Siege of Rhodes,' but it is not so well done as when Roxalana was there, who, it is said, is now owned by my Lord Oxford." Evelyn also, in his Diary, has the entry: "9th Jan., 1661 — 62, I saw acted ' the third part of the Siege of Rhodes.' In this acted the fair and famous comedian Roxalana \ from the part she performed — and I think it iOi XIV EDITORS PREFACE. was the last — she being taken to be the Earl of Oxford's Miss (as at this time they began to call lewd women)." It has been doubted if after her mishap, Mrs. Daven- port again appeared upon the stage. The name of a Mrs. Davenport appears in 1663, at Lincoln's Inn Fields, as Camilla, in Tuke's "Adventures of Five Hours." On March 2nd, 1667, a Mrs. E. Davenport played Sabina, and a Mrs, F. Davenport, Flavia, in Dryden's " Secret Love, or the Maiden Queen," and in the cast of " The Black Prince " of the Earl of Orrery, given in the October of the same year, see " Roscius Angli- canus," p. 14, are the names "Valeria Disguised, F. Damporf, and a Lady, Betty Dainport" It is unUkely, however, that any of these characters would have been assigned to the Mrs. Davenport, whose fame was such in Roxalana, and whose name Downes, p. 20, places at the head of the four principal actresses whom Davenant boarded at his house. How difficult is the task of arriving at an accurate knowledge of facts concerning the early stage, may be judged by the foregoing story. It is needless to say that upon the subject of the lady carried oft' by Lord Oxford, Downes supplies no informa- tion. Except in the case of such noblemen as were also dramatists, the old prompter is judiciously char}' of dealing with the titled mohocks, who, after the appear- ance of women on the stage, commenced perpetually to infest the theatre, and when promises and blandishments failed, did not hesitate to employ force to carry oft' the actresses. Davcnant's before-mentioned play, The "Siege of Rhodes," finds conspicuous mention, juge 20, when Downes states — aproi)Os of the opening by Sir William Davenant, of the theatre in Lincoln's Inn Fields, in the spring of 1662, with the I'irst and Second parts of "The editor's preface. XV Siege of Rhodes" and "The Wits"— that the new- scenes and decorations then employed, were the first that were introduced into England. Unless, which is possible, this means that the " scenes and decorations " were the same that had previously been used, this declaration is inaccurate. Scenery had been employed in London six years previously, and curiously enough, in the same play, which as chance arranges, is histori- cally, the most interesting work in the English language. The question of accuracy in Downes, depends, to a certain extent, upon the point whether the representation of a first draft of the Siege of Rhodes, which Cromwell permitted, is to be regarded as dramatic or operatic. In 1656 was published a work entitled "The Siege of Rhodes. Made a Representation by the Art of Pro- spective in Scenes, and the Story sung in Recitative Musick. At the back part of Rutland House, in the upper end of Aldersgate Street, London. London, Printed by J. M. for Henry Herringham, and are to be sold at his shop, at the Sign of the Anchor, on the Lower Walk, in the New Exchange. 1656." This piece, which was subsequently enlarged into "The Siege of Rhodes," as it is now known, appears to have been examined by few of the stage historians. Langbaine in his " Account of the English Dramatick Poets," says, " Siege of Rhodes, in two Parts. These plays were likewise, in the times of the Civil War, acted in Stilo Recitativo, and printed in quarto, but afterwards en- larged by the Author, and acted with applause at the Duke of York's Theatre in Lincoln's-Inn Fields."* The "Biographia Dramatica" and Mr. Halliwell's "Dictionary of Old Plays," mention no difference between the first edition and that subsequently enlarged and published in * Account of the Dramatick Poets, page xio. Miwriifai^S XVI EDITOR S PREFACE. 1659 (?). The earlier edition however, differs widely from the first of the two parts of " The Siege of Rhodes." The character of Roxalana does not even appear in it, and it has but seven characters against eleven named characters and many supernumeraries in the later edition. It occupies forty pages, with eight pages of preliminary matter, and two, of which one is blank at the end, form what is called " The Story Per- sonated." It is in Five " entries " and not in acts. The First part in the Second edition is also in Five entries, occupying 46 pages without counting preliminary matter. The second part is divided into acts. Two copies of the earliest impression of " The Siege of Rhodes," are in the British Museum Library. This first sketch was acted some time about the date of its publication, at Rutland House, which was situated near Charter-House Square. Concession for the performance of " Declamation and Musick after the maimer of the Ancients" had been obtained from Cromwell, by the Lord Keeper Whitelock, Sergeant Maynard, and other persons of influence. A letter from Davenant to Sir Bulstrode Whitelock, included in the " Memorials," is interesting in many respects, and has, I believe, been printed in no work dealing with the stage. The entire passage is as follows: Sep. 3., 1656. " I received this letter from Sir William Davenant. My Lord, When I consider the nicety of the times, I fear it may draw a curtain between your lordship and our opera; therefore, I have presumed to sciul your lord- ship, hot from the pitss, wh:it we mean to represent, making your lordship my supreme judge, though I editor's preface. XVll despair to have the honour of inviting you to be a spectator. I do not conceive the perusal of it worthy any part of your lordship's leisure, unless your ancient relation to the Muses make you not unfiling to give a little entertainment to poetry; though in so mean a dress as this and coming from, my lord, Your lordship's most obedient servant, William Davenant."* This letter serves to show that Whitelock was favour- able to Davenant's scheme, that the first representation given by Davenant at Rutland House, was subsequent to Sep. 3rd, 1656, and that Davenant from the first, by way of avoiding the use of the word stage-play, called his first production an opera. Long after he had dis- missed the music and produced regular tragedies, he adhered to the word opera, the use of which had enabled him to steer his bark in " ticklish times." It has been held that the first performance at Rutland House was on May 21st, 1656. This is not quite sure. Previous to the representation of "The Siege of Rhodes," something in the nature of a masque was given. The title of this was "The First Days Entertainment at Rutland-House, by Declamations and Musick, After the manner of the Ancients by Sr W. D." It was printed in small 8vo, by I. M. for Henrj' Herringham, London, 1657. In the copy in the King's Library, British Museum of this scarce little volume, the date is altered in a contemporary hand-writing, to 1656 ; and the date of November 22nd, which has been supposed to be that of the actual day of publication, is added. Suffi- cently timid was this venture. It begins with music; the author then, in a prologaie, excuses his own attempt. Subsequently Diogenes, as the representative of Puritanic * Memorials, p. 650 L XVIU EDITOR S PREFACE. views, and Aristophanes, speaking for enlightened Athenians, in turn address the public, and are followed by a Londoner and a Parisian, who speak as to the relative advantages of the capitals they inhabit. The entertainment is liberally interspersed with music, vocal and instrumental, by Dr. Charles Coleman, Captain Henry Cook, Mr. Henry Lawes, and Mr. George Hudson. In The Siege of Rhodes, by which this tentative per- formance was followed, a bold step was taken in advance. A regular play was acted and sung, with tlie accompani- ment of scenery, which was the first that had been ex- hibited on the English stage. The following list of cha- racters is from the prefatory matter to the printed play : — Solyman by Capt. Henry Cook. Villerius „ Mr. Gregory ThorndelL Alphonso „ Mr. Edward Coleman. Admiral „ Mr. Matthew Lock. Pirrhus „ Mr. John Harding. Mustapha „ Mr. Henry Persill. Linthe „ Mrs. Coleman, wife to Mr. Coleman. *' The composition of Vocal music was perform'd. The First Entry by Mr. Henry Lawes. „ Second „ ,, Capt. Henry Cook. „ Third „ „ Capt. Henry Cook. „ Fourth „ „ Mr. Matthew Lock. „ Fifth „ ,, Mr. Henry Lawes." The interest of these particulars cannot easily be overrated. ^Litthew Lock is, of course, the composer to whom is now generally assigned the music to Macbeth, which however, has been claimed for Purccll. Henry Lawes is the musician who composed the songs for *' Comus," and acted the Attendant's part in the famous performance at Ludlow Castle. Henry Persill is Henry --r^ EDITOR S PREFACE. XIX Purcell, also a musician, the father of the more celebrated Henry PurcelL Cook was a recognised musician, and so assumably in their day, were Harding, Edward Coleman, and Thorndell, whose names however, I do not find in Musical Dictionaries. We may assume this to have been an open perfor- mance, since D'Avenant in the epilogue to the enter- tainment at Rutland House, by which this was preceded, delivers these lines : — *' We have your Money, true ; if you can call That ours of which we make no use at all. The Poets never mind such toys as these — [SAews 7noney in his hand.'] But keep them to be sent for when you please. At worst (if you may credit, in frail times. Bankers, who turn and wind a world of Rimes) — They are but bow'd, (qy. borrow' d) laid in a trunk above And kept as simple Tokens of your love." Mrs. Coleman, is accordingly, to be recognized as the first English professional actress. She took after- wards to the stage. Pepys says, concerning her, October 31, 1665, " About nine at night I come home, and anon comes ]Mrs. Coleman and her husband, and she sung very finely, though her voice is decayed as to strength, but mighty sweet, though soft, and a pleasant jolly woman, and in mighty good humour. She sung part of the Opera, though she would not own she did get any of it without book in order to the stage." In her performance of lanthe, Mrs. Coleman, however, did not speak the lines assigned her, but gave them in a species of chaunt, or what Aubrey in his " Miscellanies " calls " stilo recitativo." In the performance of " The Siege of Rhodes " at Rut- XX editor's preface. land House, stage scenery was for the first time used. Scenery of a sufficiently elaborate kind had been em- ployed in different countries in the representation of the Miracle plays. With these however, I am not concerned. In the time of Shakespeare and Ben Jonson, as evidence conclusively proves, expensive scener}' was provided for masques. So far as regards a stage-play, it was first used by Davenant. Dryden, more than once, bears testimony to the introduction of scenes by Davenant, and Corey, in "The Generous Enemies," 1A72, speaking of the former stage, says : — " Coarse hangings then, instead of scenes were worn, And Kidderminster did the stage adorn." In an address to the reader, which appears in the first edition of the original piece, and is omitted from subsequent editions, Davenant apologises for the shortcomings of his scenery, advancing in excuse the smallness of the room to which he was confined. The following passage is striking, in more ways than one : — " It has been often wisht that our Scenes (we having oblig'd ourselves to the variety of five changes, accord- ing to the Ancient Dramatic distinctions made for time), had not been confined to eleven foot in height, and about fifteen in depth, including the places of passage reserv'd for the Musick. This is so narrow an allowance for the fleet of Solyman the Magnificent, his army, the Island of Rhodes, and the varieties attending the Siege of the City, that I fear you will think we invite you to such a contracted trifle as that of the Caesars carved upon a nut." A little lower l:o C(Mitinucs : " We conceive it will not be unacceptable to you if we recompense the narrowness of the Room, by con- taining in it so nujch as could be conveniently acconi- iSLj EDITOR S PREFACE. XXI plisht by Art and Industry : which will not be doubted in the Scenes, by those who can judge of that kind of Illustration, and know the excellency of Mr. John Web, who design'd and order'd it." Here then is the first mention of the scene-painter and machinist, the predecessor of the Stanfields and Bever- leys, of a later period. Even now, the list of claims upon attention of " The Siege of Rhodes" is not explained. When subsequently, Davenant removed it to the Cockpit, and gave it with regular company and scenic accessories less limited by space, he announced it as a play. As at first given, with recitative and song ; he spoke of it, as has been said, as an opera. As such, it was the beginning of opera in England. Dryden, in a brief disquisition upon operas, prefixed to his " Albion and Albanius," deals with the establishment of English opera, and a preface to " The Fairy Queen," an adaptation of " The I^Iidsummer Nights' Dream," with music by Purcell, 1692, says "that Sir WilHam D'Avenant's * Siege of Rhodes ' was the first opera we ever had in England, no man can deny ; and is indeed a perfect opera, there being this dif- ference only between an opera and a tragedy, that the one is a story sung with proper action, the other spoken. And he must be a very ignorant player, who knows not there is a musical cadence in speaking • and that a man may as well speak out of tune as sing out of tune." ** The Siege of Rhodes " may then claim, as has been said, to be historically, the most interesting English play. Coming after an entertainmentwhich cannot by any stretch be called dramatic, it marks the re-establishment of the theatre after Puritan rule ; it is the first opera ever given in this country ; it introduces the first English actress who xxii editor's preface. ever chaunted (not spoke), on the English stage ; it exhibits the first scenery ever employed in the case of a regular dramatic production, not being a miracle play or a masque, and it names the first provider of scenery for a work of this class, as distinguished again from the masque, in which, at a much earlier date, elaborate decorations were employed. This information is principally supplemental to that of Downes, who has little to say concerning anything that took place in connection with theatrical affairs before the period of 1662, when he joined as prompter the company of Sir William Davenant, at his theatre, Lin- coln's Inn Fields. That Downes was of a meek, and probably indolent nature, is suggested by the story he tells of himself (p. 34), how on the opening day of the theatre in Lincoln's Inn Fields, being on the opening day of the theatre in Lincoln's Inn Fields being to act Haly in " The Siege of Rhodes," " the King, Duke ot York, and all the Nobility in the House, and the first time the King was in a Publick Theatre, the sight of that August presence spoil'd me for an Actor too." In no respect, however, can Downes be regarded as superfluously scrupulous. On matters concerning the theatre under his own immcdiite supervision he is moderately accurate. In respect of the other house the Theatre Royal, subs quently known as Drury Lane, he is not always trustworthy. The annotations in the copy of Davies, from which the present reprint is taken, con- sist of corrections as well as of additions. Neither Davies, nor indeed, Waldron, to whom the publication of his notes is due, is much mine .Tciurate than Downes. Accuracy in the jieriod in which Davies and Waldron wrote was less i)rized than it has since become, editor's preface. xxiii and there are very few particulars in early theatrical works on which complete reliance can be placed. Genest even, who wrote a century later than Waldron, and had access to materials which were not open to his predecessors is, as has been seen, not impeccable. So valuable however, is his work, and in the main, so trustworthy, no student of theatrical literature would press unduly upon the few shortcomings to be found in his important and serviceable book. Thanks to the great kindness of Mr. Robert "^V. Lowe, an enthusiast in all stage matters, and author of a biblio graphy of theatrical works — which I trust will shortly see the hght — I am able to indicate the cases of error detected by Genest in Waldron's re-publication of the " Roscius Anglicanus," and to point out some inaccuracies in the original. At pages 2 and 3, Downes says, "Note, these following came into the Company some few Years after : Mrs. Boutel, Mrs. Ellin Gwin, Mrs. James, Mrs. Rebecca Mar- shall, Mrs. Rutter, Mrs. Verjuice, Mrs. Knight." Those who turn to the pages on which these names appear w\\\ see it is impossible to tell whether Mrs. Marshall and Mrs. Rutter are intended to be on the list of those who came later or earlier. Nor does the correction which Downes supplies in the errata do much to clear matters. Con- cerning this, Genest, Vol. I., page 34, says, " Downes is incorrect with regard to Mrs. Boutell, she was certainly on the stage in 1663 or 1664." Her name indeed, appears as Estifania in " Rule a Wife and Have a Wife," by Beaumont and Fletcher, the assumed date of produc- tion of which is 1663 or 1664. On page 3, Downes speaks of the opening on Thurs- day in Easter Week, "being on the 8/// Day of Aprils 1663," of the New Theatre in Drury-Lane. Apropos of •^ xxiv editor's preface. this, Genest says, Vol. I., p. 43, " it was not so called originally — the usual appellation of it was the Theatre Royal simply," and he adds instances of its being called "the King's Theatre in Covent Garden." Genest is here a little hypercritical. The house stood on the exact site now occupied by Drury Lane theatre. Downes does not, moreover, call it Drury Lane theatre, but the new theatre in Drury-Lane, and this it was. The statement of Downes, p. 17, that Rhodes "fitted up a House then for Acting, call'd the Cock-Pit in Drury Lane," Genest challenges, stating that " Downes seems to have copied Wright (Historia Histrionica), and they are probably both WTong — it is certain, from Pepys, that the Old Actors were in possession of the Cocl^it, in August, 1660 — and that Rhodes' Company were acting at White Friars (or Salisbury Court, as it is more usually called), in March, 1661," Vol. I., p. 30. It seems certain that Davenant occupied both theatres, playing in 1658, at the Cock-pit where he produced his " Cruelty of the Spaniards in Peru," and on Nov. 15th, 1660, removing to Salisbury Court. The assertion, p. 20, that Sir William Davenant " in Spring, 1662, Open'd his House" is disputed by Genest, who (Vol. L, p. 38), says, " It appears from Pepys that Davenant began to act in the last week of June, 1661." There is some confusion here, and Downes is apparently wrong in more than one respect. He thus states that the rehearsals took place in The Apothecaries' Hall. Now, according to Cunningham (Hand-Book to Lon- don) the Apothecaries' Hall was not erected until 1670, /. e., eight years later than the time mentioned. There appears, however, from a Latin inscription standing over the inner side of the Gateway leading to the Court- Yard, to have been in 1633, on same .spot a building, en- EDITOR S PREFACE. XXV titled Cobham House, belonging to Lady Howard of Effingham, which was totally destroyed in the great fire. To this, which seems to have been devoted to the same purpose as the present building, Downes assumably refers. The difi'erence between Downes and Pepys is not easy to explain. The theory that Sir William Davenant's " opera," to which, as the name of the theatre, Pepys frequently refers, was some other house than Lincoln's Fields, is almost easier of acceptance than the belief that Downes is in error in matters of such importance as his own first engagement and appearance. " After this the Company Reviv'd Three Comedies of Mr. Sherly's," p. 27. Here follow the names of four comedies. Waldron, in the reprint, alters three into four. The four comedies named are not, however, by Shirley, the last, " Woman's a Weathercock," being by Nash and Field. Downes's omission arises, as Genest (Vol. i., p. 78), points out, through "not inserting, and also after the School of Complements," the third piece. Waldron's mistake is, in its way, worse than any of which Downes is guilty. " King Henry the 5//;, wrote by the Earl of Orrery," p. 27. This play, Genest (Vol. i., p. 53) points out, was first performed Aug. 13, 1664, and not as Downes implies, rather than asserts, in 1667. The erroneous punctuation of Downes, p. 29, is un- corrected by Waldron. A portion of the page should, Genest shews, (Vol. i., p, 36), read thus : " This Play had wonderfull Success, being Acted 1 2 Days together. When our Company were Commanded to Dover in May, 1670, the King with all his Court, meeting his Sister, the Dutchess of Orleans there, this Comedy and Sir Solomon Single, pleas'd Madain the Dutchess, and the whole Court extremely." ' ^ '■■w wy f .-jj' ?:.e -it ' fa ) mw » iw« » u vi XXVI EDITORS PREFACE. At page 39, Do.vnes speaks of the " Sallary " of Hart as " 40 Shillings a Week to the Day of his Death." On this, Genest says (Vol. I., p. 375), " Hart did not act after the Union, on account of those infirmi- ties which obliged him to leave the stage — he received a salary of 30 shillings a week to the day of his death, according to agreement — Downes says 40, but this seems a mistake." According to the Memorandum, /■ dated Oct. 14, 1681, between Dr. Charles Daveaant, Thomas Betterton, Gent., and William Smith, Gent., of the one part, and Charles Hart, Gent., and Edward Kynaston, Gent., on the other part, which formed the basis of the famous Union of the two patents. Hart and Kynaston both made over the title they had " to Six and Three Pence a-piece for every Day there shall be any Playing at the King's theatre."'* This at the rate of six representations a week, would make thirty-sevea shillings and sixpence a week. What is the justification for Genest's contradiction is not apparent. Very far from exhausting the inaccuracies of Waldron's reprint are the instances advanced by Genest. In dealing with the first of the errata printed on the verso of the title page, ^^ Page 2, Read Reeves /t^r Knight," Waldron, assumes that the correction applies to the name of Reeves, who appears in the list of actors, and therefore holds that the erratum should be Head Knight /or Reeves. This is a bad shot. The printer fell into the same blunder and subtituted page 2 for page 3, where lor Mrs. Knight should be read Mrs. Reeves. The name of Reeves appears, page 12, opposite Ascanio, just the character to be assigned a boy, and that of Mrs. Reeves is also in the list. No actor of the name ol Knight is however encountered, and the Mrs. Knight wiiom • Life of Mr. Thi)in.is licUtilon, 17 10, p. 9. EDITORS PREFACE. XXVU Waldron subsequently mentions, was a singer and a favourite of Charles II., who is said to have used her for dis-honourable purposes, but is not known as an actress. Waldron seems afterwards, to have had some justifiable doubts as to the value of his own suggested emendation. Page 26, Waldron notices that in the third line of the page the name of a character played by Mr, Young, is omitted. The character in question is that of the Cardinal. Upon the account of " Sir Martin Marral," p. 28, Wal- dron has the note '* This passage is involved in such impenetrable darkness, that, in despair of being able to throw light on it, I leave it in its original obscurity." Obscure the passage undoubtedly is 3 what Downes means, however, seems intelligible. " All the parts being very just and exactly perform'd, 'specially Sir Martin and his Man." " Mr. Smitla and several others since have come very near him" — />., Harris as Sir Martin's Man — " but none equalled " him, " nor yet Mr. Nokes in Sir Martin." Style is not Downes's strong point. It is conceivable even that Downes originally wrote 'specially Sir Martin his Man, or Sir Martin's Man, which would remove all ambiguity. Dryden's *'Sir Martin Mar-all " is a version of " L'Etourdi " of Moliere, and Warner, otherwise Sir Martin's Man, answers to the character of Mascarille in that play, a character so im- portant that in the hands of M. Coquelin ain'e^ it is the most important in a modern revival at the Coraedie Frangaise. Harris distinguished himself greatly by per- formances of this kind, and was admitted to the intimacy not only of the licentious wits of the town — see what Pepys says, May 30th, 1668, of the roguish (!) proceed- ings with my Lady Bennett and the ladies — but of Pepys himself and Dryden. His sense of his importance was XXVIU EDITORS PREFACE. not less than that of subsequent actors. Under the date July 22nd, 1663, Pepys says " Wotten tells me the reason of Harris's going from Sir William Davenant's house is, that he grew very proud; and demanded ^20 for himself extraordinary, more than Betterton or any body else, upon every new play, and ;j{^io upon every revive, which with other things, Sir W. Davenant would not give him, and so he swore he would never act there more, in expectation of being received at the other House ; but the King will not suffer it, upon Sir W. Davenant's desire that he would not, for then he might shut up house, and that is true. He tells me that his going is at present a great loss to the House, and that he fears he hath a stipend from the other House privately. He tells me that the fellow grew very proud of late, the King, and every body else, cr)'ing him up so high, and that above Betteiton, he being a more ayery man, as he is indeed." The praise of Downes is accord- ingly justified. In the note (page 38) Downes speaks of Lee's play, " The Prince of Cleve." For this name should be read " The Princess of Cleve." This error is contradicted by Davies or Waldron. In the copy from which this reprint is executed, the lines, p. 40, apropos of *' Valenlinian," "and the vast interest the Author made in Town," are struck through by Davies. Waldron, with customary infelicity, snjiplies the following note. " Mr. Davics's MS. directs, on what authority I know not, * and the vast interest t/u author made in town* to be intirely left out. I think it should on no account be omitted ; as it serves to shew, that tho' indifferent Pieces have been brought on the Stage, and rendered fashionable by the influence of Authors of rank, in our days ; to the exclusion or ilcjircssion, of writers of editor's preface. xxix perhaps more merit, and certainly less interest ; it is no new artifice, but a stale trick produced by dignified authors above a century ago." So far as the present case is concerned, the indignant moralising of Waldron is so much waste bredth. Downes was once more in error, and the correction of Davies was entirely justified. Valentinian was produced at the Theatre Royal in 1684, and Lord Rochester died four years previously. Unless his ghost revisited " the glimpses of the moon " to look after his new play, which was only an adaptation ; the remarks of Downes are futile. What the prompter in- tended possibly, to say was, that the vast interest the friends of the author made in town, contributed to the success of the play. This, however, is not too probable, since the friends of a man deceased some four years are not often busy in his behalf. The obscurity of the note on page 40 provokes from Waldron a pardonable growl. What Downes assumably means to say is, that " Mr. Griffin so excell'd in Surly, Sir Edward Belfond, the Plain Dealer, none succeeding in the two former characters have Equalled him [nor any] except his Predecessor, Mr. Hart, in the last." The insertion of the two words between brackets gives the sentence an intelligible meaning. Downes's note to " The True Widow," Sir Anthony Lone (should be Love), etc., p. 41, is obscure. Waldron, following Davies, strikes out the word " which." This adds to the intelligibility of the sentence, but detracts from its accuracy, since more than one of the plays men- tioned was distinctly successful. These suggestions, for the best of which, as before stated, I am indebted to !Mr. Robert W. Lowe, meet some only of the difficulties in the '' Roscius Anglicanus." To point out minor slips and to indicate all the suggestions XXX EDITOR .S PREFACE. of Davies and Waldron would extend this preface beyond reasonable bounds. On the matters which came under his own personal cognisance Downes, as has been said, is a fairly trustworthy authority ; on those outside his immediate ken, on events that is that took place before he joined Sir William Davenant's company, or that hap- pened at the rival house, the Theatre Royal, he is subject to frequent correction. For the casts with which plays were first given, and for the period of production, he is in many cases the only existing authority and many curious particulars he preserves are nowhere else to be found. A completely annotated edition of the Rosicus Anglicanus, such as Davies and Waldron dreamed of supplying, would be in fact a history of the revival of the stage. While engaged in compiling this preface I have met with a second copy of the original edition of the '•' Ros- cius Anglicanus." This interesting volume, like the copy from which the reprint is taken, is interleaved and contains MS. corrections by Isaac Reed, one of three successive proprietors, consisting of Isaac Reed, Peter Cunningham, and the elder Charles Mathews. Some of these deserve to be preserved. Reed (whose handwriting I have compared with the MS. of his " Notitia Dramatica") says on one of the blank preli- minary pages. " At Mr. Henderson's Sale a Copy of this Pamphlet with', the Preface was bought by Mr. Malone for j(^i. c,s. od." Fronting page i is written, " Killegrews Patent, dated 25 April, 14 Car. 2, 16C.'. Davenant's isth January, 14 Car. 2, 1662." A propos to the mention of \\'intersel (p. 2), is as follows, " Wm. Wintershul, (Kc) tJ the Rehearsal), was an excellent judicious .\ctor and the best Inslrucli of others." He died July, 1679. Opposite ^ EDITOR S PREFACE. XXXI Mrs. Long (p. 20) is the note, " She was Mistress to the Duke of Richmond, (See Dunois — Memoirs of the Court of England, 1708, p. 40, P. 11)." At p. 28 the mistake of DoAvnes, who calls a play by the Earl of Orrery, " Mr. Anthony Gasman," instead of " Mr. Anthony," is corrected, and it is stated of " Sir Martin Marrall " that it is "entered in the Books of the Stationers' Com- pany as written by the Duke of Newcastle." Page 31, the commentator extracts from " Reliquiae Baxterianse," Fo. 1696, P. 89, Part 3, a paragraph of some interest. " This Year (167 1) a new Playhouse being built on Salis- bury Court in Fleet-street called the Duke of York's the Lord Mayor (as is said) desired of the King, that it might not be, the youth of the City being already so corrupted by sensual pleasures ; but he obtained not his desire. And this, Janry, 167 1, the King's Play-house in Drury Lane took fire and was burnt down but not alone, for about 50 or 60 houses adjoining, by fire and blowing up accompanied it." Opposite the following page (32) are three notes, No. I. draws attention to the fact that " From the Preface to The Miser by Shadvvell, it appears that Play was the last acted at the King's Theatre in Cov : Garden before the fatal fire there, That Play was published 4tOj 1672." Note 2 points out from Graham's " School of English Painting," p. 398, that Robert Aggas commonly called An- gus, "a. good landscape painter," painted "many scenes for the play-house in Cov. Garden." According to Walpole's "Anecdotes of Painting," Vol. i, p. 157, Robert Aggas died in 1679. After stating this, the note continues " but I know not what the Author I quote means by a Play- house in Cov : Garden before the year 1679. I suppose it shod, be the theatre in Dorset Gardens. From the above preface to Shadwell's Play it seems as though Graham was XXXII EDITORS PREFACE. right, and Mr. Walpole's Conjecture ill founded." Note 3, " I also find an Opera called Ariadne acted at the Theatre Royal, Cov : Garden, 4th, 167I." Page 33, opposite the words, Master of Art in Cambridge, is given the name " Wm. Arrowsmith," who is mentioned in the ** Biographia Dramatica," for which Isaac Reed was greatly responsible, as the supposed author. Page 34, in reference to Lee's method of quitting the stage are the following observations : — " Lee, however, seems not entirely to have left the stage. In the Dramatis Personje to Fatal jealousies printed in the next year, 1673, 4to, I find the name of Nath. Leigh performing the part of a Captain of the Guards. This also was acted at the Duke's Theatre No Lee's name is to be seen opposite to the character of Duncan in the printed Copies of Macbeth." P. 36. A note to Don Carlos, says, " Booth in a letter to Aaron Hill says 'Mr. Betterton observed to me many years ago that Don Carlos succeeded much better than Venice preser\'ed, or the Orphan, and was infinitely more applauded and followed for many years." " 1678, Friendship in Fashion acted ; Nell Gwin performed in it. A mistake, it was certainly another Mrs. G." P. 37. "Oedipus, King of Thebes," of this it is said, " In this particular Downes must certainly be mistaken, Dryden in his Vindication of the Duke of Guise says he wrote the ist and 3rd acts and drew the Scenery of the whole Play. P. 42, \'indn." P. 40. The mistake of Downes concerning Lord Rochester previously mentioned is corrected. P. 43. Opposite " I'he Prophetess," are the words, " Langbaine who in general is tolerably accurate, ascribes this Alteration to Dryden, but on that point he is most likely to be mistaken." .1. .1 .IHP editor's pre|>J«3^^^ xxxiii P. 43. At bottom of page appears, " From this Period the Theatre in Dorset Garden became deserted. In 1698 v^ a Lottery was drawn in it as I learn from the title of a Pamphlet called 'The Wheel of Fortune, or Nothing for a Penny. Being Remarks on the drawing of the Penny Lottery at the Theatre Royal in Dorset Garden wth. the characters of some of the honourable Trustees and all due acknowledgm^ to his Honour the Under- taker. Written by a Person who was cursed mad he had not the;^T,ooo lot, 4to, 1698.'" At the close are references to the " Reliquiae Baxteri- anse " and Camden's "Annals/' with regard to accidents at theatres and to Dryden, S, propos to the opening of Drury Lane House, 26th March, 1674. On a following page is another note of interest in the shape of an " Extract from a MS. by Oldys, a Letter to the Right Honble. Sr, Richard Brocas Lord Mayor of London By a Citizen, P. 32, 8vo, 1730. " This is written against the pernicious consequences of tolerating the new erected Playhouse in Goodmans Fields. The Author in P. 21 asserts and produces particulars to prove it that upon the lowest calculation this single Playhouse costs the Kingdom a great deal above Three Hundred Thousand Founds a year by the loss that is sustained in the work and labour of the Artificers and other Spectators that fill it." " This was the Theatre which Islx. Thomas Odell by a Licence from the Lord-Chamberlain was Master of and I have heard he cleared or got an Hundred Pounds a Week in it till the City got him silenced or expelled though I think there has been playing there under Giffard and others ever since Mr. Odell who died in May, 1 749, has written a Discourse upon his hardships XXXIV EDITOR S PREFACE. / sufferings and losses on that occasion wch I have seen in MSS." As the following casts mentioned before differ in some respects from any assigned the respective plays in Genest they are given. The first and second occur opposite P3ge 5> the third opposite page 36. The spelling of the MSS, is followed. •' The Cast of A King and no King as acfled at the Theatre Royal, 4to, 1676. Arbaces, Tygranes, Gobrias, Bacurius, Mardonius, Bessus, Lygones, Mr Mr Mr Mr Mr. Two Swordmen, Arane, Panthea, Spaconia, Othello at the same Theatre, Hart. Kynaflon. Winterfhall. Lydal. Mohun. Mr. Lacy or Mr. Mr. Cartwright. ( Mr. Watson. ( Mr. Haynes. Mrs. Corey. Mrs. Cox. Mrs. Marfhall. Shottrell. Duke, Brabantio, Gratiano, Lodovico, Othello, Cafsiio, lago, Roderigo, Montano, Clown, Desdemona, Emilia, Bianca, 4to, 1687. Ur. Lydal. Mr. Cartwright Mr. Griffin. Mr. Harris. Mr. Hart. Mr. Kynaflon. Mr. Mohun. Mr. Beeston. Mr. Watson. Mr. Haynes, Mrs. Cox. INIrs. Rulter. Mrs. James. Ferdinand, Cardinal, Antonio, Delio, Cast of The Duchefs of Malfcy in 1678. ^ Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Harris. Young. Smith. Medbonrn. OH »i editor's preface. XXXV Bofola, Caflruchio, Sylvio, Pefcara, Maletelle, Roderigo, Grisolan, Dutchefs, Cariola, Old Lady, Julia, Mr. Betterton. Mr. Richards Mr. Cademan. Mr. Norris. Mr. Price. Mr. Cogun. Mr. Percival. • " Mrs. Betterton. Mrs. Norris. Mrs. Ofbom. Mrs. Shadwell." As a document of interest to students of Stage History, the Ordinance for the Suppression of Stage Plays is reprinted in facsimile from a copy of the rare original in the possession of Messrs. Jarvis and Son. Rofcius Anglicanus, O R AN HISTORICAL REVIEW OF THE STAGE: After it had been Suppres'd by means of the late Unhappy Civil War, be- gun in 1 64 1, till the Time of King Charles the lis Reftoration in May 1 660. Giving an Account of its Rife again ; of the Time and Places the Governours of both the Companies firfl Ereded their Theatres. The Names of the Principal A6lors and AdrefTes, who Perform'd in the Chiefeft Plays in each Houfe. With the Names of the mofl- taking Plays ; and Modern Poets. For the fpace of 46 Years, and during the Reign of Three Kings, and part of our prefent Sovereign Lady Queen ANNE, from 1660, to 1706. Non Audita 7iarto, fed Co7nperta. Lo7idon, Printed and fold by H. Playford, at his Houfe in Arundel- /ireet, near the Water-fide, 170S. H |g«| ERRATA. pA£;e 2, Read Reeves, /or Knight. P. 9 r. Cidaria, for Cidu- ria. P. 19, line 33, r. Four for Three. P. 12, r. Aquilius, for Aquitius. P. 28 litu 17, r. Moleire, y^r Moleiro. P. 31 /m^ 20, leave ou* John, am/ r. Wife of Mr. Antony Leigh. P. 35 lint 2, /mz/i? out was, between all cwd^ things. /*. 32, //'«; 1 5, r, AV Symou Softhead, y&r Simeon Lofthead. TO THE READER. THE Editor of the enfuing Rela- tion^ being long Converjant with the Plays and AEiors of the Ori- ginal Company^ under the Patent of Sir William Davenant, at his Thea- tre in Lincolns-Inn-Fields, Opetid there 1662. And as Book keeper and Prompter^ con timid fo^ till October 1706. He Writing out all the Parts in each Play ; and Attending every Morning the AEiors Rehearfals^ and their Performances in After noons; Em^ holdens him to affirm^ he is not very Errontous in his Relation, But as to the AEiors of Drury-Lane Company^ A 2 under To the Reader. under Mr. Thomas Killigrew, he having the Account froniMr . Charles Booth fometimes Book-keeper there ; If he a little Deviates, as to the Sue- cejfftve Order, and exaSi time of their Plays Performances, He begs Pardon of the Reader, and Subfcribes hinfelf, His very Humble Servant, 'John Downes. Rofcius (O Rofcius Anglicanus, O R A N HISTORICAL REVIEW O F T H E STAGE IN the Reign of King Charles the Firft, there were Six Play Houfes allow'd in Town : The Black - Fryars Company, His Majefty's Servants ; The Bull in St. John's- fireet ; another in Salisbury Court ; another call'd the Fortune ; another at the Globe ; and the Sixth at the Cock-Pit in Drury-Lane ; all which con- tinu'd Afting till the beginning of the faid Ci- vil Wars. The fcattered Remnant of feveral of thefe Houfes, upon King Charles's Reftoration, Fram'd a Company who Ad:ed again at the Bull, and Built them a New Houfe in Gibbon's Tennis Court in Clare-Market ; in which Two Places they continu'd Adling all 1660, 1661, 1662 and part of 1663. In this time they Built them a New Theatre in Drury Lane : Mr. T'ho- mas Killigrew gaining a Patent from the King in B order ssaaBaHi m (> ) order to Create them the King's Servants ; and from that time, they call'd themfelves his Ma- jefty's Company of Comedians in Drury-Lane. Whofe Names were, viz. Mr. Tfieophilus Bird. Mr. Hart. Mr. Mohun, Mr. Lacy. Mr. Burt. Mr. Car tw right. Mr. Clun. Mr. Baxter. Mr. Robert Shatterel. Mr. IViUiam Shatterel. Mr. Duke. Mr. Hancock. Mr, Kynafton. Mr. Winterjel. Mr. Bateman. Mr. Blagden. Note, thefe following came not into the Com- pany, till after they had begun in Brury-Lane. Mr. Hains. Mr. Griffin. Mr. Goodman, Mr. Ly^^o//. Mr. Charleton. Mr. *S'/zfr/)'. Mr. Beejion. Thefe Four were Bred up from Boys under the MaRer ACTORS. Mr. Bell. Mr. Reeves. Mr. Hughs. Mr. Harris. Women. Mrs. Corey. Mrs. y^//;/ Marjhall. Mrs. Eaftland. Mrs. Weaver, Mrs. t//»/;/7/. Mrs. A'w/>. Mrs. Hughs. NOT E, thefe follow- in6) Javcs, > Biys, ) For his Jiiji A^ing, all Q^ave him due Praije, His Part in the Cheats, Jony Thump, Teg and B In i/tefe Four Excelling ; The Court gave him tlie And many others were Adled by the Old Company at the Theatre Royal, from the time they begun, till the Patent defcended to Mr. Charles Killigrew, which in 1682, he join'd it to Dr. Davenani's Patent, whofe Company Acfled then in T>orJet Garden, which upon the Union, were Created the King's Company : After which, Mr. Hart Ad;ed no more, having a Pen- fion to the Day of his Death, from the United Company. I mud not Omit to mention the Parts in fe- veral Plays of fome of the Acftors ; wherein they Excell'd in the Performance of them. Firji^ Mr. Hart, in the Part of Arbaces, in King and no King ; yimintor, in the Maids Tragedy ; O- thello; Rollo; Brutus, in Julius Cd-Jar; Alexander ^ towards the latter End of his Ading ; if he Aded in any one of thefe but once in a Fort- night, the Houfe was fill'd as at a New Play, efpecially yllexander, he Adting that with fuch Grandeur and Agreeable Majerty, That one of the Court was pleas'd to Honour him with this Commendation ; That Hart might Teach any King on Earth how to Comport himfelf : He was no lefs Inferior in Comedy ; as Afofca in the Fox ; Don John in the Chances, IFiltiblood in the Mock Aftrologer ; with fundry other Parts. In all the Comedies and Tragedies, he was conccrn'd he Perform'd with that Exa(5lncfs and Perfedion, that not any of his Succeffors have Equall'd him. Major fm'mmmmm'Kmmmk ( 17 ) Major Mohun^ he was Eminent for Volpone ; Face in the Alchymifi ; Melantius in the Maids Tragedy ; Mardonius, in King and no King ; Caffius^ in Julius Cajar; Clytus m Alexander; Mi- thridates, &c. An Eminent Poet feeing him Ad: this laft, vented fuddenly this Saying ; Oh Mohun,Mohun! 'ThoulittleMan ofMettle^ifljhould Write aioo Plays,id PVritea P art for thy Mouth; in fhortj in all his Parts, he was most Accurate and Correal. Mr. Wimerjel, was good in Tragedy, as well as in Comedy, efpecially in Cokes in Bartholo- mew Fair ; that the Famous Comedian Nokes came in that part far fhort of him. Then Mr. Burt, Shatterel^ Cartwright and fe- veral other good Adlors, but to Particularize their Commendations wou'd be too Tedious ; I refer you therefore to the feveral Books, their Names being there inferted. Next follows an Account of the Rife and Progreffion, of the Dukes Servants ; under the Patent of Sir William Davenant who upon the faid Junftion in 1682, remov'd to the Theatre Royal in Drury-Lane, and Created the King's Company. In the Year 1659, General Alonk, Marching then his Army out of Scotland to London. Mr. Rhodes a Bookfeller being Wardrobe- Keeper formerly ( as I am inform'd ) to King Charles the Firft's, Company of Comedians in Black- Friars ; getting a Licenfe from the then Go- verning State, fitted up a Houfe then for A6ling call'd the Cock-pit in Drury-Lane, and in a fhort time Compleated his Company. C Their ^ MinMNS^ ( i8 ) Their Names were, viz. Mr. Better ton. Mr. Sheppy. Mr. Lovel. Mr. Lillijlon. Mr. Underhill, Mr. 'Turner. Mr. 'Dixon. Robert Nokes. Note, Thcfe fix commonly A 1 1 n yr Ti '^'^s not alittle m- Jolly, perform d by Mr. Betterton ; jurious to the Ca- Old True -man, by Mr. Lovel ^^^l^"" indigent ^ T.i TT • /^ ' Officers ; efpecial- Young True-man, Mr. tiarris ; Lut-\y the Character /^r,Mr. Underbill \ Captain Worme,""^^^";"''- ^""^ Mr. Sandford , Parfon Soaker, Mr. Daeres ; Puny, Mr. Nokes; JVill. Mr. Price; Au- relia, by Mrs. Betterton ; Lucia, Mrs. Ann Gibbs; Laughing Jane, by Mrs. Long : This Comedy being A6led fo perfectly Well and Exadl, it was perform'd a whole Week with a full Audience. The Dutchefs of Malfey. Wrote by Mr. Web- lier : Duke Ferdinand, Perform'd by Mr. Harris: Bofola, by Mr. Betterton : Antonio, Mr. Smith: Cardinal, Mr. Toung : Dutchefs of Malfey, by Mrs. Betterton : Julia, the Cardinals Miftrefs, by Mrs, Gibbs : This Play was fo exceeding Ex- cellently ASfed in all Parts ; chiefly, Duke Ferdi- nand and Bojola : It fiU'd the Houfe 8 Days Suc- ceflively, it proving one of the Beft of Stock Tragedies. The Tragedy of Muftapha, Wrote by the Earl of Orrery. The part of Solyman the Magnifi- cent, j^^^ ( ^6 ) cent, was done by Mr. Betterton : Mujlapha^ Mr. Harris : Zanger, Mr. Smith : Rujlan^ Mr. Sand- ford: Pyrrhus^ Mr. Richards : Mr. Young. Hal}\ Mr. Cademan: Roxolana, Mrs. Davenport : ( Af- terward Mrs. Betterton^ and then by one Mrs. Wijeman ) Queen oiHiingaria, Mrs. Davies. All the Parts being new Cloath'd with new Scenes, Sir JVilliam^s great Care of having it perfed: and exactly perform'd, it produced to himfelf and Company vaft Profit. Thefe being all the Principal, which we call'd . Stock-Plays ; that were ASIed from the Time they Open'd the Theatre in 1662, to the beginning of May^ 1665, at which time the Plague began to Rage : The Company ceas'd Acting ; till the Chrijlmajs after the Fire in 1666. Yet there were feveral other Plays A5led^ from 1662, to 1665, both Old and Mo- dern : As a Comedy call'd, A Trick to catch the Old One : T'he Sparagus Garden: Wit in a ConJIa- ble. Tu Quoque : '•the tragedy of King Lear, as Mr. Shakefpear Wrote it ; before it was alter'd by Mr. Tate. The Slighted Maid : The Step-Mo- ther ^ both Written by Sir Robert Stapleton : Lazv again/l Lovers, by Sir William Davenant. 'fis bet- ter than it roas : Worfe atul Worfe : Thefe Two Comedies were made out of Spanip, by the Earl of Brijiol. The Ghofts, Wrote by Mr. Holden : Pandora, Wrote by Sir IJ'illiam Killi- grew. The Company ending as I faid with Mujia- pha, in May 1665, after a Year and Half's Difcontinuance ; they by Command began with the fame Play again at Court .- The Chrijl- inafs after the Fire in 1666 : And from thence continu'd again to Ad at their Theatre In Lin- cohCs Inn- Fie Ids. The Im ^YERSITY ) OF / The firfl new Play fh^iy^^i^^a in 1666, was : The Tragedy of Cambyfes, Ki?7g of Perfi^, Wrote by Mr. SeUle : Cambyfes, was perfornt'd by Mr. Betterton : Frexajpes the General, by Mr. Harris : Prince Smerdis, Mr. I'oung : Mandana, by Mrs. Betterton : All the other Parts, being perfe6lly well A6ted, Succeeded fix Days with a full Audience. ^fter this the Company Revived Three Comedies of Mr. SherlyV, viz. The Grateful Servant. The Witty Fair One. The School of Comple- ments. The JVoman's a Weather Cock. Thefe Plays being per- fecflly well Perform'd ; ef- pecially Dulciiio the Grate- ful Servant, being Atled by Mrs. Long; and the firfl time fhe appear'd in Man's Habit, pro\-'d as Beneficial to the Company, as feveral fucceeding new Plays. Richard the Third, or the Englijh Princefs, "Wrote by Mr. Carrol^ was Excellently well Ac- ted in every Part ; chiefly, King Richard, by Mr. Betterton ; Duke of Richmond, by Mr. Har- ris ; Sir William Stanly, by Mr. Smith, Gain'd them an Additional Eftimation, and the Ap- plaufe from the Town, as well as profit to the whole Company, King Henry the ^th. Wrote by the Earl of Orrery. Mr. Harris, y^^edthe.K'mg : Mr. Bet- terton, Owen Tudor : Mr. Smith, Duke of Bur- gundy : Duke of Bedford, Mr. Lillijlon : Earl of Warwick, Mr. Angel : Clermont, Mr. Medburn: Queen, Mrs. Betterton. This Play was Splen- didly Cloath'd : The King in the Duke of Tork's (28) York's Coronation Suit : Owen Tudor, in King Charles : Duke of Burgundy, in the Lord of Oxford^Sy and the reft all New. It was Excel- lently Perform'd, and Aded lo Days Succef- fively. After this my Lord Orrery, Writ Two Come- dies : The firft call'd Gufman ; the other Mr. Anthony Gufman^ took very well, the other but indifferent. There being an odd fort of Duel in it, between Mr. Nokes and Mr. Angel, both Comicks meeting in the Field to fight, one came Arm'd with a Blunderbus, the other with a Bow and Arrows. Sir Martin Marral, The Duke of New-Cajlle, giving Mr. Dryden a bare Tranflation of it, out of a Comedy of the Famous French Poet Mon- Jeur Moleiro : He Adapted the Part purpofely for the Mouth of Mr. Nokes, and curioufly Po- liftiing the whole ; Mr. Smith, Adling Sir John Swallow ; Mr. Toung, Lord Dartmouth; Mr. Un- der hill ^ Old Moody ; Mr. Harris y Warner ; Mrs. Norris, Lady Dupe; Mrs. Millijent, Madame Da- vies. All the Parts being very Juft and Exact- ly perform'd, 'fpecially Sir Martin and his Man, Mr Smith, and feveral others fince have come very near him but none Equall'd, nor yet Mr. Nokes in Sir Martin : This Comedy was Crown'd with an Excellent Fntry : In the laft Ad at the Mask, by Mr. Prieji and Madam Davies ; This, and Love in a Tub, got the Com- pany more Money than any preceding Come- She Wou'd if She Cou'd, Wrote by Sir George Etheridgc; Courtall, A6\:cd by Mr. Smith: Free- man, Mr. Toung : Sir Jojlin, Mr. Harris : Sir O- livery (29) liver^ Mr. "Nokes : Ariana, Mrs. Jenning\ Gatty^ Mrs. Davies: Lady Cj^/^i^;!?!?^, Mrs. Shadwell. It took well, but Inferior to Love in a Tub. After this were A6led, The Queen of Arra- gon^ and Cupid's Revenge The Impertinents, or Sullen Lovers, Wrote by Mr. Shadwell ; This Comedy being Admi- rably A6ted : Efpecially, Sir Pofitive At-all, by Mr. Harris : Poet Ninny ^ by Mr. Nokes ; IVood- cock^ by Mr. Angel : Standford and Emilia ; the Sullen Lovers : One by Mr. Smith, and the o- ther by Mrs. Shadwell, This Play had won- derful Succefs, being A6ted 1 2 Days together, when our Company were Commanded to Dos ver, in May 1670. The King with all his Court, meeting his fifter, the Dutchefs of Orleans there. This Comedy and Sir Solomon Single^ pleas'd Madam the Dutchefs, and the whole Court extremely. The Fre^ich Court wearing then Exceffive fhort Lac'd Coats ; fome Scarlet, fome Blew, with Broad waft Belts ; Mr. Nokes havinof at that time one fhorter than the French Fafhion, to Ad Sir Arthur Addle in ; the Duke of Monmouth gave Mr. Nokes his Sword and Belt from his Side, and Buckled it on himfelf, on purpofe to Ape the French : That Mr. Nokes lookt more like a Dreft up Ape, than a Sir Arthur : Which upon his firft Entrance on the Stage, put the King and Court to an Excef- five Laughter ; at which the French look'd ve- ry Shaggrin, to fee them.felves Ap'd by fuch a Buffoon as Sir Arthur : Mr. Nokes kept the Dukes Sword to his Dying Day. Sir Solo7nan Single, Wrote by Mr. Carrol, Sir Solomon Adled by Mr. Betterton: Peregrine Wood- land ( 30) land, by Mr. Harris : Single, by Mr. Smith: Mi. IVary^ by Mr. Sandford: Timothy, by Mr. Under- hill: Betty, by Mrs. Jofmjon: Julia, Mrs. Better- ton. The Play being Singularly well Jcfed, it took 1 2 Days together. The Woman made a Juftice : Wrote by Mr. Betterton: ^rs. Long , Aclingxht Juftice fo Charm- ingly ; and the Comedy being perfe(5l and juft- ly Afted, fo well pleas'd the Audience, it con- tinu'd Afling 14 Days together: The Prologue being fpoke to it each Day. The Amorous Widow, or the Wanton Wife, Wrote by the fame Author. Mr. Betterton, Ac- ted Lovemore: Mr. Smith, Cunnigham: Mx. Nokes, Barnaby Brittle : The Widow, A/rs. Betterton .- Mrs. Longy Mrs. Brittle : She Performed it fo well, that none Equall'd her but Mrs. Brace- girdle. The Unjuft Judge,or Appi us Virginia, done by the sa.mQ Author, FirginiusA^ed by Mr. Betterton, Appius, the Unjuft Judge, by Mr. Harris: Virgi- nia, by Mrs. Betterton. And all the other Parts Exa5lly perform'd, it lafted SucceHively 8 Days, and very frequently A5ied afterwards. The Afan's the Mifter, Wrote by Sir IVilliam Davenant, being the laft Play he ever Wrote, he Dying prefently after ; and was Bury'd in Wejlminfter-Abby , near Mr. Chaucer sMo\\\xrr\tr\\., Our whole Company attendinq^ his Funeral. This Comedy in general was very well Per- form'd, efpecially, the Maflcr, by Mr. Harris ; the Man, by Mr. Under hill: Mr. Harris and Mr. Sandford, Singing the Epilogue like two Street Ballad-Singers. Note, v ( 31 ) Note, My. Cademan in this Flay\ not long after our Company began in Dorfet-Garden; his Fart be- ing to Fight with Mr. Harris, was Unfortunately, with a JharpFo{lpierc'dneartheEye,which]foMaim'd both his Hand and his Speech, that he canmake little ufe of either-, for which MiJ chance, he has received a Fenjion ever si7ice 1673, being 35 Years a goe. This being the laft New Play that was Jfied in Lincolns-Inn Fields, yet there were fundry o- thers done there, from 1662, till the time they left that Houfe ; As Love's Kingdom, Wrote by Mx.Fleckno: The Royal Shepherdefs, by Mr. Shad- well: Two Fools well met,hY My. Lodwick Car Hie: The Coffee-houje, by My. Sincerf: All-Flot, or the Difguifes, by My. Stroude : All which Expir'd the third Day, fave the Royal Shepherdefs, which liv'd Six. Note, About the Year 1670, Mrs. Aldridge, after Mrs. Lee, after Lady Slingsby, alfo Mrs. L^z;^/AVife,Mr. John Lee, My. Crosby, MYS.John- fon, were entertain'd in the Dukes Houfe. The new Theatre in Dorfet-Garden being Fi- nifh'd, and our Company after Sir William^s Death, being under the Rule and Dominion of his Widow the Lady Davenant, Mr Betterton, and Mr Harris, ( Mr. Charles Davenant ) her Son Acting for her) they remov'd from Lincolns- Inn- Fields thither. And on the Ninth Day of Nove7nber i6yi, they open'd their new Theatre with Sir Martin Marral, which continu'd Ailing 3 Days together, with a full Audience each Day ; notwithftanding it had been A^ed 30 Days before in Lincolns-Inn- Fields j and above 4 times at Court. * Next ( 32 ) Next was AHed Love In a Tub, it was per- form'd 2 Days together to a full Audience. The firft new Play AEled there, was King Charles the VIII. of France ; it was all new Cloath'd, yet lafted but 6 Days together, but 'twas A5led now and then afterwards. The next new Comedy, was the Mamamou- chi or the Cittzen -turn'd Gentleman, Wrote by Mr. Ravenscraft i Trickinore, and Fencing- Mafter, by Mr. Harris ; French Tutor and Sing- ing Mafter, by Mr. Haines : ( He having Af- fronted Mr. Hart J he gave him a Difcharge and then came into our Houfe ) Old Jorden, Mr. Nokes-JDi: Curai, M r.Sand/ord;S\rSi?;ieonLofi-head, Mr. Underhill;Lucia, Mrs. Betterton; Betty '•Trick- more^ Mrs. Leigh : This Comedy was look upon by the Criticks for a Foolifh Play ; yet it con- tinu'd Acling g Days with a full Houfe ; upon the Sixth the Houfe being very full : The Poet added 2 more Lines to his Epilogue, viz. The Criticks come to Hi/s, and Dam this Play, Tet/pite of tliem/elves tliey can't keep away. However Mr. ISIokes in performing the Ma- momouchi pleas'd the King and Court, next Sir Martin^ above all Plays. The third new Play AHed there was the Gen- tleman Dancing-Mafter, Wrote by Mr. IVitcher- lyy it lafted but 6 Days, being like't but indiffe- rently, it was laid by to make Room for o- ther new ones. Note, Several of the Old Stock Plays were AHed between each of the/e 3 new Ones. Epfom ( 33 ) Epfotn Wells, a Comedy Wrote by Mr. Shad- well : Mr. Rains, was AEied by Mr. Harris'. Be- vilj by Mr. Betterton: IVoodly, by Mr.Smith: Juf- tice Clod-pate, Mr. Underhill : Carolina, Mrs. John/on : Lucia, Mrs. Gz-^i-j : Mrs. Ji//, i^^y Mrs. Betterton : Mr. A^fj/^d-^, Mr. ^zj/^^-Z : Mr. ^w^d-/, Fribble. This Play in general being Admirably A6led, produc'd great Profit to the Company. Note, Mrs. Johnfon in this Comedy^ Dancing a Jiggfo Charming well. Loves power in a little time afterCoerc'dher toDance moreCharming,elfe-where. A Comedy call'd 'The Reformation, Written by a Afafter of Arts in Cambridge ; The Refor- mation in the Play, being the Reverfe to the Laws of 7lDiu.y- y^^^ Bctterton : Marcian the Ge- I.nne HoKje. I lie i iv /r o • ; -t-i i - /v?>»r^ ^/ cieve >r neral, Mr. bmith \ Theodojius^ ^^7/'';S''v^?'/'/"^' Mr. ♦ IVilliams, : Athenais, Mrs. ivell Aaed, Out (uc- n i r« • ' i • ceedej not /o Will as Barrv '. All the Parts in t bemg t/u- others. perfedly perform'd, with feve- ral Entertainments of Singing ; Compos'd by the Famous Mafter Mr. henry Fiircell, ( being the firft he e'er Compos'd for the Stage ) made it a living and (jainful Play to the Company : The Court ; efpecially the Ladies, by their daily charming prcfcnce, gave it great Encour- agement. The Lancajltirc Witches, Acted in i68r, made by Mr. Shad-zirll, being a kind of Opera, hav- ing feveral Machines of Myings for the Witches, and other Divcrtinij^ Contrivances in't : All being well perlorm d, it prov'd beyond Kx- pcdation ; rf^-M ( 39 ) pedlation ; very Beneficial to the Poet and A^ors, All the preceding Plays, being the chief that were A5led in Dorfet-Garden, from November 1 6/ 1, to the Year 1682 ; at which time the Patentees of each Company United Patents ; and by fo Incorporating the Duke's Compa- ny were made the King's Company, and im- mediately remov'd to the Theatre Royal in Drury-Lane. Upon this Union, Mr. Hart being the Heart of the Company under Mr. Killsgreisj^s Patent never A5led more, by reafon of his Malady ; being Afflifted with the Stone and Gravel, of which he Dy'd fome time after : Having a Sallary of 40 Shillings a Week to the Day of his Death. But the Remnant of that Compa- ny ; as Major Mohun, Mr. Cartwright , INIr. Ky- najion, M.Y.GriJfin, Mr. Goodman,Mr. Duke Wat- fon, Mr. Powel Senior, Mr. Wiltjhire, Mrs Corey, Mrs. Bowtell, Mrs Cook, Mrs. Monfort, &c Note, now Mr. Monfort and Mr. Carlile, were grown to the Maturity of good Actors The mixt Company then Reviv'd the feve- ral old and Modern Plays, that were the Pro- priety of Mr. KilUgrew, ?iS,Rule a Wife, and have a Wife: Mr Better ton A^ing Michael Perez: Don Leon, Mr Smith: Cacofcgo, Mr. Cartwright: Mar- garet ta, Mrs. Barry: E/iiphania,'N[vs Cook: Next, 1'he Scornful Lady. 'The Plain Dealer. The Mock AJirologer. The Jovial Crew. The Beggars Bufh. D 4 Bar- (4o) Bartholomew- Fair. The Moor ^Venice. Rollo. The Humorous Lieutenant. 'TheDoubleMarriage.'^'\x.\\d\wtTsot\\tTS. Next new Play was the Tragedy of Valenti- nian^ wrote by the Lord Rochejler ^ from Beau- mont and Fletcher. Mr. Goodman A^cd Valentini- an : Mr. Beiterton^ y^cius : Mr. Kynajion^ Maxi- jnus: Mr. Griffin^ Pontius: Madam Barr)\ Lucina^ &c. The well performance, and the vaft Inte- reft the Author made in Town, Crown'd the Play, with great Gain of Reputation ; and Pro- fit to the A^ors. In Anno 1685. The Opera of Albion and Al- hianus was perform'd ; wrote by Mr. Dryden, and Compos'd by Monfieur Grabue : This being perform'd on a very Unlucky Day, being the Day the Duke of Monmouth^ Landed in the Weft : The Nation being in a great Confterna- tion, it was perform'd but Six times, which not Anfwering half THE Charge they were at, Involv'd the Company very much in Debt. The firft new Comedy after ^°^J' {^^'iP'j^'Y^ K'mcr James came to the Crown, Edward Hcifomiy/z.- was bir Courfly A ue, wrote by riainUoaicr /,^// ) Mr. J'Filks, Proper and Comely in Perfon, of Graceful Port, Mein and Air ; void ol Affeilation ; his Elevations and Cadencies juft, Congruent to Elocution : Efpecially in Gentile Comedy ; not Inferior in Tragedy. The Emiffion of his Words free, eafy and na- tural ; Attrading attentive filence in his Audi- ence, ( I mean the Judicious ) except where there are Unnatural Rants, As, -Pie mount the Sky, And kick the G — ds like Foot-balls , as Ifly : As Poet Z) — rfy has it, PFhich puts the Voice to/uch Odjlrepcrous Jiretch, Requires the Lungs of a Smith'j Bellows to reach. He is indeed the finifht Copy of his Famous Predeceffor, Mr. Charles Hart. Mr. Cyber, A Gentleman of his time has Ar- riv'd to an exceeding Perfedlion, in hitting juflly the Humour of a ftarcht Beau, or Fop ; as the Lord Fopington-, Sir Fopling and S^vc Courtly, equalling in the laft, the late Eminent Mr. Mounfort, not much Inferior in Tragedy, had Nature given him Lungs Strenuous to his finifht Judgment. Mr. EJcourt ,HiJirio Flatus ; he has the Honour ( Nature enduing him with an eafy, free, un- affected Mode of Elocution ) in Comedy a - ways to Lastificate his Audience, efpecially Quality, ( Witnefs Serjeant Kyte ) He's not Excellent only in that, but a Superlative Mi- mick. E 2 Mr. t^ ( 52 ) Mr. Booths A Gentleman of Liberal Education, of form Venuft ; of Mellifluent Pronuntiation, having proper Gefticulations, which are Graceful Atteada nts of true Elocution ; of liis time a most Com- pleat Tragedian. Mr. John/on, He's Skilful in the Art of Painting, which is a great Adjument, veiy Promovcnt to the Art of true Elocution, which is always requirable in him, that bears the Name of an Ac- tor ; he has the Happinefs to gain Applaufe from Court and Ci- ty : Witnefs, Moro/e, Corhaccio, Mr. Hothead and feveral others ; He is a true Copy of Mr. Underliill, whom Sir William Dave' nant judg'd 40 Year ago in Lincolns-Inn-Fields, the truefl Come- dian in his Company. Mr. Doggct, On the Stage, he's very Afpe(flabund, wearing a P'arce in his Face; his Thoughts deliberately framing his Utte- rance Congruous to his Looks : He is the only Comick Original now Extant : Witnefs, Ben. Solon, Nikin, The yew of Venict, Ac. Mr. Pinkdhman, He's the darling of Fortunatits, he has gain'd more in Theatres and Fairs in Twelve Years, than thofe that have Tugg'd at the Oar of Acfting thefe 50. Next Mr. Mills, Mr. Powel, Mr. Bullock ; the 2 firft Excell in Tragedy ; the other in Comedy, ^c. I mull not Omit Praifes due to Mr. Betterton. Hit fir/} and no'M only remain of the old Stock, of the Company of Sir William Da- venant in Lincolns-Inn Fields ; he like an old Stately Spreading Oak noao flands fixt. Environ' d round 7vitk braz'e Youn^^ Growing, Fknu-ifJiing Plants: There needs nothing to f peak his Fame, more than the follo7uing Parts, Pericles Prince of Tyre. The Bondman. Cafar Borgia. The LoyarSubjedt. The Mad Lover. Richard the Third, King Lear. Solyman the Magnificent. Hamlet. Macbeth. Timon of Athens. Othello. Oedipus. Jaffeu: King Henry the Eighth. .S/r John Falflaff. Mr, Dryden a little before his Death in a Prologue, rendring him this PRAISE. He like thefctting Sun,flilljlioots a Glimmery Kay, Like Antient R .M E Mayjlick in decay. FINIS _^ S DECLARATION I J Of The %. J LORDS and COMMONS J 1^ Aflembled in Parliamem, X S. For the appeafing and quietting of ^ rog^ all unlawfull Tumults and Infurredions in "^ , Septemb. 3. London Printed for lohn Wright. 1642. ^51 Die Veneris 2 Septem. 1 642. A Declaration of the LORDS and Commons Aflembled in Parliament. [e Lords and Commons having lately fent Sir 'Thomas Barrington, and M. \^k Grymjione, into the Coun- ty of EJfezy for the appea- I ling and quieting of di- g vers AfTemblies of peo- jlple gathered together in ■g in great bodies , w^ho had much damnified the hou- ies, and taken the goods of divers perlbns without Law or other authority; And having received a re- port from Sir Thomas Barrington^ being returned, A 2 that that the peopleupon thefirfl: knowledgegiventhem that the Parliament required theyfliouldforbearthe fearchins: of any houfes for Armes and Ammuni- tion, or the taking goods out of any Houfe other- wife then is or fhall be dire(5ted by the Parliament, or without the affiftance of fome ofthofe perfons who are by both Houfes of Parliament declared that they ought to be prefent ; The people did thereupon prefently yeeld obedience and with- drew themfelves in a peaceable manner, and as they were required, did make reftitution of Plate, Mo- ney, and many other goods by them taken from fuch as were pretended popifli Recufants, and o- ther malignant perfons, and that they had expref- fed great zeal and forwardnefle to comply with the directions of Parliament for the future. The r^^-^ Lords and Commons doe declare, that they re- ■TH' fcent the aforefaid exprefTions of the people, and ^RSf r / i their ready obedience, as a teftimony of that duti- ^£SN^i><^ full affedion which they beare to the Parliament, and to the prefent fervice of the Kingdome, & doe hereby order and declare, that all persons whofoe- ver,that have taken either Mony Plate or any other Goods out of the Houfe or Houfes, or ftom the perfons of any whofoevet, without the fpcciall commaud or Order of both, or either Houfe of Parliamentjdiall forthwith reftore the fame to the parties, from whome they were taken, or other- wife be proceeded againll,as the Lords and Com- mons (hall furthcrdircO, upon complaiut made, 1 And And as both Houfes of Parliament have beene,and will be very careful! to preferve the peace of the Kingdome, by difarming of all Recufants,and fuch others as fhall be knowne or juftly fulpecSted to be enemies thereunto, and to the pious and good en- deavours of this Parliament; And to that purpofe have by a Declaration paffed by affent of both Houfes, the three and tw^entieth oi Augud laft, ex- preiled what perlbns fhall be inrrufted for the ma- naging of that fervice ; They doe thereby further Order and Command, that no perfon doe prefume either alone,or accompanied with others,to break or violently enter the Houfe of any whatloever, under colour of pretence of difarming Recufants or other perfon s pretended to be enemies to the peace of the Kingdome ; without the particular command of fuch as are intrufted or deputed by the Parliament, And it is further declared,that fpe- ciall and fpeedy care be taken therein, for the ie- curity of the Kingdome ; and particularly for the County of EJfex, from whom they have received fo many expreisions of their duty to the fervice of the publike, though the Parliament cannot but let them know,that feverall violent actions by fome of them unwarrantably committed,are extreamly dif- allowed;but as the Lords and Commons declare , that they fhall be ever ready to give afsiftance, and protection to all fuch as fhall obey the commands of both, or either Houfes of Parliament , fo they doe refolve, that they will inflid: exemplary pu- A 3 nifhment nifhment on all fuch according to their feverall demerits, as fhall be refra(5tory and difobedient to thefe their commands made knovvne to them; and by all good wayes, and meanes will further endea- vour to bring them to a legall tryall for fuch their Offences; But for the incouragement of thofe who have beene forward, and a(ftive in the fervice of the Common-wealth, It is thought fit to give them notice, that thofe eight Horfes taken from Sir John Lucas, and brought up to the Parliament by Sir Thomas Barritjgton, and intended by Sir John Lucas, for the ftrengthning of a Malignant party, and are delivered by command to the Lord Gene- rail to be by him imployed for the prefervation of the Kingdome, and the Parliament hath caufed the fame Sir lohn Lucas, and M. Newcomeny to bee committed to feverall prifons; And it is Refolved, that they fliall be brought to their feveralls tiyalls and receive fuch punilliment as Ihall appeare to be juft according to their demerits. And like pro- ceedings fliall be had againll: all fuch as Ihall be found difturbers of the peace of that County. Die An Order of the Lords and Commons concerning Stage-playes. WHereas the diftrefled E- ftate of Ireland, fteeped in her own Blood, and the diftra- £led Eftate of England,threatned with a Cloud of Blood, by a Ci- vil! Warre, call for all pofTible meanes to appeafe and avert the Wrath of God appearing in thefe Judgements ; amongft which, Fa- iling and Prayer having bin often tryed to be very effe^luall, have bin lately, and are ftill ejoyned ; and whereas publike Sports doe not well agree with publike Calamities, nor publike Stage- playes with the Seafons of Hu- miliation, this being an Exercife of fad and pious folemnity, and the other being Spectacles of pleafure pleafure, too commonly expref- fing laciuious Mirth and Levitie: It is therefore thought fit,and Or- deined by the Lords and Com- mons in this Parliament Aflem- bled, that while thefe fad Caufes and fet times of Humiliation doe continue, publike Stage-Playes fliall ceafe,and bee forborne. In- ftead of which, are recommended to the people of this Land, the profitable and feafonable Confi- derations of Repentance, Recon- ciliation, and peace with God, which probably may produce outward peaceandprofperity,and bring againe Times of Joy and Gladnefle to thefe Nations. Die Veneris, Septemb. 2. 1642. Ordered by the Lords and Commons in Parliament^ thai this Order be forthwith Printed and published. John Browne Cler. Pari. FINIS. _ ... 1.. -^ / :.ir i^ RETURN CIRCULATION DEPARTMENT TO— ^^ 202 Main Library LOAN PERIOD 1 HOME USE 2 3 4 5 6 ALL BOOKS MAY BE RECALLED AFTER 7 DAYS Renewals and Recharges may be made 4 days prior to the due do Books may be Renewed by calling 642-3405. DUE AS STAMPED BELOW RECEIVED BY fiaY 1 u I'^o CIRCULATION DEPT MOlU .vvXi."^ o6 iAR 31987 frUTO.Pisc.FEB20 '87 WftY25^9i y 'AUTO DISC MM 07 '67 [i^cA- 3 / •' / -zr FORAA NO. DD6, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKEL BERKELEY, CA 94720 «««^U,B«.„y.„.,,,,^^^^^ 2000157018 /^>1/ Uevrvdi^^ ■.j>^'"^ 1 il