The inscription on the portrait reads as follows: "Effigies Seb. Caboti Angli, filii Johannis Caboti Veneti Militis Aurati, Primi Inventoris Terrae Novae sub Henrico VII. Angliae Rege." PORTRAIT OF SEBASTIAN CABOT From a copy of the original portrait purchased by Richard Biddle (author of this Memoir) from the heirs of Charles Joseph Harford of Bristol, England. In the great fire at Pittsburgh in 1845, Mr. Biddle's Library and with it the " Harford picture " were completely destroyed. Fortunately two copies of the Cabot portrait had been already made. One in 1838 by John G. Chapman with Mr. Biddle's permission for the Massachusetts Historical Society, and another in 1841, with like permission, by Cephas G. Thompson for the New York Historical Society. It is from the latter copy that the illustration for this book has been made. MEMOIR SEBASTIAN CABOT; WITH A REVIEW OF THE HISTORY OF MARITIME DISCOVERY. ILLUSTRATED BY DOCUMENTS FROM THE ROLLS, NOW FERST PUBLISHED. PUBLISHED BY CAREY AND LEA. 1831. REPRINTED BY J. B. LIPPINCOTT COMPANY 1915. Philadelphia: Printed by James Kay, Jun. & Co. No. 4, Minor Street. Reprinted by J. B. Lippincott Company 1915. ACIFIC CCAST HiSTOHY CONTENTS. INTBODUCTION . . * 1 BOOK I. CHAP. I. -The highest Northern Latitude reached by Cabot Authorities collected by Hakluyt Attempt to explain their supposed discrepance . . 7 CHAP. H. The subject continued Gomara . . .* 20 CHAP* HI. Cabot penetrated into Hudson's Bay ,. , '.. . . . 26 CHAP.. IV. First Work of Hakluyt Maps and Discourses left by Sebastian Cabot at his death ready for Publication . . . . . . 37 CHAP. V. Comparative Agency of John and Sebastian Cabot .' . . 41 CHAP. VI. First point seen by Cabot Not Newfoundland . . . . 51 CHAP. VH. Cabot ^d not confer the name Prima Vista .... 57 CHAP. vra. Richard Eden's Decades of the New World" Cabot's own statement as to the Place of his Birth . . . . . .61 CHAP. IX. Patents of 5th March, 1496, and 3rd February, 1498 The latter now first published from the Rolls Total misconception heretofore as to its Terms 70 CHAP. X. Name of the English Ship which first reached the Continent of America- How far Cabot proceeded to the Southward along the Coast Subsequent Voyage of 1498 . .78 IV CONTENTS. CHAP. XI. Voyage to Maracaibo, in 1499 ^ . CHAP. XH. Correspondence between Ferdinand of Spain and Lord Willoughby de Broke Cabot enters the service of Spain 13th September, 1512 Revi sion of Maps and Charts in 1515 Appointed a Member of the Council of the Indies Projected Expedition to the North under his Command to Sail in March, 1516 Death of Ferdinand in January, 1516 Intrigues Cabot returns to England ... . . . 96 CHAP. XIII. Cabot's Voyage of 1517 from England in search of the North-West Passage 102 CHAP. XIV. Hakluyffc error with regard to the Voyage of 1517 . . .108 CHAP. XV. Voyage of 15 17, the one referred to by Cabot in his Letter to Ranrosio . 1 15 CHAP. XVI. Cabot appointed, in 1518, Pilot-Major of Spain Summoned to attend the Congress at Badajos in 1524 Projected Expedition under his Command tothe Moluccas . .. . . .. . .118 CHAP. XVH. Jealousy of the contemplated .Expedition on the part of Portugal Mission of Diego Garcia, a Portuguese ... . . . 123 CHAP. XVIH. Interference with the arrangements for the Voyage Mendez appointed second in Command contrary to the wishes of Cabot De Rojas The Sealed Orders Prejudices of the Spanish Historians Expedition sails 129 CHAP.' XIX. Complaints in the Squadron Pretended Causes of Dissatisfaction Mutiny Quelled by the Energy of Cabot Happy Results His conduct justi fied to the Emperor Ridiculous charges suggested by Diego Garcia . 134 CHAP. XX. Cabot enters the La Plata Necessity for caution His Predecessor as Pilot- Major killed in attempting to explore that River Carries the Island of St Gabriel His progress to St Salvador where a Fort is erected Its position Loss in taking possession ..... 145 CHAP. XXI. Cabot proceeds up the Parana Erects another Fort, called Santus Spiritus, and afterwards Fort Cabot Its Position Continues to ascend Curiosity of the Natives as to the Expedition Passes the Mouth of the Parana- Enters the Paraguay Sanguinary Battle thirty-four leagues up that River Three Hundred of the Natives killed, with a loss to Cabot of Twenty, five of his Party Maintains his Position Garcia enters the River In. CONTENTS. V terview with Cabot Mistakes of Charlevoir, Scc.t Cabot returns to the Fort Santos Spiritus . . . 150 CHAP. XXII Report to Charles V. Its Contents Prospect which it held out Peru con templated in Cabot's original Plan of 1524 Specimens found by him of the precious metals obtained thence by the Guafanis Emperor resolves on a great Expedition His pecuniary embarrassments Pizarro offers to make the Conquest of Peru at his own Expense Reflections the Name Rio de La Plata not conferred by Cabot Misrepresentation on this and other points . ....... 156 CHAP. XXIII. Cabot's residence in the La Plata Subjection of remote tribes Claims of Spain rested on this Expedition Treaty with the Guaranis Detailed Re port to the Emperor as to the productions, &c. of the country Misconduct 'of the followers of Garcia Leads to a general attack from the Natives Return to Spain . . * . . . 163 CHAP. XXIV. Employment of Cabot after his return Resumes his functions as Pilot-Major Makes several voyages Fame for bravery and skill Visit of a learned Italian Cabot's allusion to Columbus . . . . .1.67 CHAP. XXV. Perversion of facts and dates by Harris and Pinkerton Cabot's return to Eng land Probable inducements Erroneous reason assigned by Mr Barrow- Charles V r makes a demand on the King of England for his return Refused Pension to Cabot Duties confided to him More extensive than those belonging to the office of Pilot-Major . . . * 171 CHAP. XXVI. Public explanation by Cabot to Edward VI. of the phenomena of the Varia tion of the Needle Statement of Livio Sanuto Point of No Variation fixed by Cabot Adopted afterwards by Mercator for his Great Meridian Refer ence to Cabot's Map Early testimonials Allusion to the English discove ries in the edition of Ptolemy published at Rome in 1508 Fournier Atten tion to note the Variation by the seamen of Cabot's school His theory, if a narrow one, would have been thus exposed . . 175 CHAP. XXVH. Mistake of Purchas, Pinkerton, Dr Henry in his History of Great Britain, Campbell in the Lives of the Admirals, and other writers, as to the Knight- ing of John or Sebastian Cabot . . . .179 CHAP. XXVHI. Stagnation of trade in England Cabot consulted by the Merchants Urges* the enterprise which resulted in the trade to Russia Preliminary difficulties Struggle with the Stilyard That Monopoly broken down Earnestness of Edward VI. on the subject His munificent donation to Cabot after the result was declared . 182 VI CONTENTS. CHAP. XXIX. Preparations for the Expedition "Precautions as to Timber Sheathing of the vessels now first resorted to in England Examination of two Tartars Chief command given to Sir Hugh Willoughby Richard Chancellor Stephen Burrough William Bui-rough Arthur Pet This Expedition con founded with another by Strype and Campbell . . .186 CHAP. XXX. Instructions prepared by Cabot for Sir Hugh Willoughby . . .190 CHAP. XXXI. The Expedition drops down to Greenwich Salutes Animating scene Pro ceeds to sea Vessels separated Fate of Sir Hugh Willoughby Chancel- ' lor reaches Wardhouse Earnestly dissuaded from proceeding further His gallant resolution Confidence of the Crew in him Reaches Archangel Excellent effect of observing Cabot's Instructions as to deportment to wards the Na,tives Success of Chancellor . . . . 193 CHAP. XXXII. Charter to the Company of Merchant Adventurers Sebastian Cabot named Governor for Life Grant of Privileges by the Emperor of Russia to Sebas tian Cabot and others An Ambassador from the Emperor embarks with Richard Chancellor Shipwreck Chancellor perishes Reception and en tertainment of the Ambassador in London 197 CHAP, xxxra. View of the Trade opened with Russia from the Letters of the Company to the Agents Prices of English manufactured goods Articles obtained in return Extensive establishment of Englishmen at Moscow when that city was destroyed by the, Tartars . . . .200 CHAP. XXXIV* The Charter of Incorporation Recites preparations actually made for voyages to the North-East, and North- West How frustrated Whale Fishery- Newfoundland Fishery The Ambassador of the Sophy of Persia at Moscow His information to the Emperor of Russia about England Followed up by a Messenger to Persia from England with a Letter proposing commercial intercourse ........ 208 CHAP. XXXV. The Search-thrift despatched to the North in 1556, under Stephen Burrough Cabot's entertainment at Gravesend Influence of the death of Edward VI. on his personal fortunes Reviving hopes of the Stilyard Merchants their insolent reference to the Queen in a memorial addressed to Philip The latter reaches London 20th May, 1557 New arrangements as to Cabot's Pension 29th May, 1557 William Worthington in possession of his papers Account of that person Manner in which the Maps and Discourses have probably disappeared Cabot's Illness Affecting Account of his Last Mo ments, by the Friend who attended him . ; . . . 213 CONTENTS. vii BOOK II. CHAP. I. Review of the History of Maritime Discovery, so far as may be necessary to exhibit the pervading influence of Cabot Patent of 19th March 1501, now first published from the Rolls, to three Merchants of Bristol, and three Por tuguese Natives brought to England and exhibited at Court Erroneous reference of this incident to Cabot Hakluyt's perversion Second Patent 9th December, 1502 Dr Robertson's misconceptions Probable reasons for the abandonment of the enterprise . . , 221 CHAP. n. First visit of Columbus to Terra Firma on his third voyage Apprised before leaving Spain of Cabot's Discovery of the Continent Projected Expedition to the North from Spain ..... 231 CHAP. m. Expedition from Portugal Cortereal The work entitled Paesi novamente ritrovatif &c. Letters of the Venetian Ambassador at Lisbon eleven daya after the return of Courtereal Reference to the previous voyage of Cabot Trinkets found amongst the Natives French translation of the Paesi, &c.in!516 . . . . . ... . -233 CHAP. IV. The region visited by Cortereal Statements of the three-Portuguese Histori- rians, Damiano Goes, Osorius, and Galvano Of Gomara, Herrera, and Fumee Edition of Ptolemy, published at Basle, 1540 The name Labrador, i. e. Labourer . . . . . . . .241 CHAP. V. Circumstances which have led to errors as to the voyage of Cortereal The Portuguese Maps Isle of Demons The fraud of Madrignanon in the Itine. rarium Portugallensium Mr Barrow's Chronological History of Voyages, &c. Dr Lardner's Cyclopaedia The Edinburgh Cabinet Library . 245 CHAP. VI. Diffusive mischief of the Itinerarium Portugallensium Grynseus Meusel Fleurieu Humboldt, &c. ....... 352 CHAP. vn. Project of Cortes in 1524. . ; . . . . 258 CHAP. VIII. Voyage of Stephen Gomez in the service of Spain .... 261 CHAP. IX. Expedition from England in 1527 Erroneous statement that one of the vess els was named Dominus Pobiscum Their names, The Samson and The Mary of Guilford Letters from the Expedition dated at Newfoundland, addressed to Henry VIII. and Cardinal Wolscy The Italian Navigator, Juan Verrazani, accompanies the Expedition and is killed by the Natives Loss Vlil CONTENTS. of the Samson The Mary of GuiMbrd visits Brazil, Porto Rico, &c. Ar rives in England October 1527 Robert Thome of Bristol His letter cfculd not have led to this Expedition . . . . . .268 CHAP. X. Voyage from England in 1536 . ' . . . . . . 278 CHAP. XI. Expedition of Cortereal in 1574, and retrospect to a pretended voyage by a person of the same name in 1464 . . .281 CHAP. XH. Frobisher , . . . . . . . 285 CHAP. XHL Hudson . 295 APPENDIX. (A.) Fabyan's Chronicle AJiusion to Cabot . . . . .299 (B.) English Expedition said to have been found by Hojeda at Caquibacoa . 301 (C.) Wai Cabot appointed Grand Pilot . , . <* . 305 (D.) Letters Patent now first published, dated 19th March 1501, from Henry VII. to Richard Warde, Thomas Ashehurst, John Thomas, of Bristol, and John Fernandas, Francis Fernandus, and John Gunsolus, Portuguese . . 306 (E.) Possible origin of the misconception as to the name Domnus vobiseum erro neously associated with the voyage of 1527 from England Forster^s mis take as to Nommbegar- Error as to the period at which Newfoundland was first frequented for Fishing ....... 315 (FO Portrait of Sebastian Cabot by Holbein . . . . .317 (G.) Error in attributing to Cabot the work entitled "Navigatione nelleparte Set- tentrionale," published at Venice in 1583 . . . .320 PREFACE. THIS volume is a reprint from the original American Edition, published by Lea and Blanchard of Phila delphia, in the year 1831. An English Edition appeared also in London the same year and was followed by a second edition issued there in 1832. The American Edition and the first English Edition are precisely alike in all respects. In the second London Edition a quo tation from the New Interlude No. 5 is introduced at page 77, and this additional matter will be found in an appendix printed at the back of the book. This issue of a modern Edition of the "Memoir of Sebastian Cabot" is undertaken by the surviving son of the author in testimony of his affectionate venera tion for his father's memory. Richard Biddle, at his death in 1847, was in his fifty-first year. A son of Charles Biddle (1745-1821), Vice-President of the Supreme Executive Council of Pennsylvania when Benjamin Franklin was its Presi dent, Mr. Biddle's early associations were connected with Philadelphia, and his legal studies pursued in his native city. In the same year of his admission to the Bar, however, he removed to Pittsburgh (Pa.), where he soon became distinguished in his profession. In a Eulogy delivered in 1847, the year of Mr. ix Biddle's death, before the members of the Pittsburgh Bar, and by one of its most distinguished members, a very vivid portrayal is given of the author's career at the Bar. The qualities of his indomitable energy are dwelt upon, and one sentence in the address, as fore shadowing his labors on this Memoir, seems apt enough to quote: "his mind was of great power and his energy was invincible no prospect of severe and interminable labor made him hesitate or falter." After ten years of active professional life, he went abroad in 1828 and settled himself in London. Here he continued a diligent student, frequenting the Courts and Libraries. Just how he was led to undertake the farther voyage for such it proved itself into those unfathomed depths of legend and fact surrounding at that time the careers of the Cabots, it may not be possible to determine. In his own preface Mr. Biddle draws attention to some very loose and inaccurate statements appearing just then in a new Edition of the "Biographic Universelle." It is entirely possible that the erroneous and slighting remarks upon the voyages of the Cabots to which he adverts may have been the inducing cause for the exhaustive researches he under took, lasting several years, and resulting in what has been recognized on high modern authority "as the best review of the history of maritime discovery relating to the period of which it treats that had appeared." (Deane (Charles), Voyages of the Cabots.) The book on its appearance made a deep impression, and although published anonymously its authorship was XI no secret. From many reviews and notices of it that appeared at the time in English, French, Italian and American publications, we select and give excerpts from those published in the London Westminster Review, and in the North- American Review in this country. In its issue of January, 1832, the Westminster Review remarks: "This book is a phenomenon among the productions of the day, for various reasons first, it is not a catch penny, next it is written with the motive of discovering truth; again it is the result of hard labor, and acute investigation among the really original authorities; it is not written for money; it springs from studies, of such accuracy and minuteness as no ordinary pecuniary reward could pay. Again its title-page is much less comprehensive than the volume and altogether from these and other causes it forms a glorious exception from the poor and paltry spirit which actuates nine publications out of ten of those that load the counters of the modern book-seller. . . . The author of this volume is an American, he does honor to his country, and we cannot but take kindly the interest he has shown in vindicating for England the parentage of the land of his birth." Quoting from the North-American Review of Jan uary, 1832: "The author has well kept the honorable promise (contained in Preface) which he has thus virtually made. He never points out an error where he is not able to substitute the truth, and never sets up a theory Xll or conjecture till he has a solid foundation of fact for it to rest upon j; . . He seems perfectly ac quainted with the contents of many rare and curious books of reference, the very titles of which are probably new to ninety-nine out of a hundred of his readers. . . . He has dragged into light manuscripts with the mould of centuries upon them, and forced them to give their tardy testimony in favor of the truth. . . . Nothing escapes his acuteness and penetra tion. . . - The book is indeed unrivalled in its way and is well worth the attentive study of a young lawyer as a model for a learned, acute and profound argument upon certain obscure and disputed points of history, which admits nothing that is irrelevant and rejects nothing that is important, and by which a cause that looks desperate at first is so triumphantly sup ported, that we wonder how the contrary impression could ever have prevailed." . It is not claiming too much to say that Richard Biddle's "Memoir of Sebastian Cabot" was the pioneer in the work of investigation and verification that has resulted in the mass of literature issued since on the early voyages of the Cabots. His discovery among the Manuscripts in the Public Record Office, London, of the text of Henry VII's second letters patent, and his distinguishing thereby for the first time that there were two Cabot voyages, in 1497 and 1498, was an immense contribution to the subject. In fact Mr. G. P. Winship, in his exhaustive treatise on the literature of the Cabot Voyages, sums up his notes on Mr. Biddle's Memoir Xlll by saying that "The strictly historical investigation into the careers of the Cabots dates from the appear ance of Mr. Biddle's volume." In a preface to "John and Sebastian Cabot" by C. Raymond Beazley, Fellow of Merton College, Oxford, appearing in 1898, the author in noting the changes of .opinion in Europe and America on certain points of history, leads off by saying, "Since the modern Cabot literature began with the appearance of R. Biddle's (American) Memoir in 1831." .< . . Not a work on the Cabots but contains references to the Biddle Memoir (Harrisse has 36 references), and a note in Winship's Cabot Bibliography mentions that an ac count of Cabot by Errizo, appearing at Venice in 1855, "is largely drawn from Biddle." Mr. Biddle returned to Pittsburgh in 1832, after an absence of four years, and reengaged in the practice of the law. In 1837 he was elected to Congress, and went to Washington the year following to attend its sessions. Mr. David Ritchie, when speaking of his election in the Eulogium referred to at the beginning of this notice, says: "No man was ever elected to that place with less intrigue or management or personal interference. He had earned such a position in this community (Pittsburgh) that the people desired his services and sent him to Congress without any solici tation on his part. . . . He had not been long in the house of representatives till his position was of the highest." He was reflected in 1838, and served in the first session of '39 and '40, but in this year XIV resigned "to the very great regret of his constituents, to whom his services gave almost universal satisfaction." On the 17th of June, 1844, he was married to Ann Eliza Anderson, eldest daughter of John Anderson of Pittsburgh. This lady survived him many years, and passed the latter portion of her life in Philadelphia, although finally removing to her daughter's house in Pittsburgh, where she died May 6th, 1908. Two children were born of this marriage: a son, Richard, now a resident of Tennessee, and a daughter, Grace, lately deceased, who married the Rev. J. Hall Mcllvaine. EDWARD BIDDLE. December, 1915. CORRECTION In a Note at foot of page 79, a printed nought should clearly have been the figure 9 Thus for " 10th August, 1407," read "10th August, 1497. To hym that found the New Isle, 101" RICHARD BIDDLE (1796-1847) Author of a Memoir of Sebastian Cabot. From the portrait by Thomas Sully, painted in 1821. INTRODUCTION. THE following pages lay claim to the share of merit that may be due to a spirit of diligent research which took nothing at second hand where an original writef, or document, could be consulted, and would not be turned aside, by any authority, from the anxious pur suit, and resolute vindication, of the Truth. They are offered, therefore, with the confidence inspired by a consciousness of good faith. Yet the author is suffi ciently aware that the public has nothing to do with the integrity of his purpose, or the patient industry with which it has been followed up, except so far as a valua ble result may have been achieved. What is now submitted made part, originally, of a much more extensive plan. But there was found, at every turn, so much to clear up, and the materials for rectification so multiplied, that it seemed impossible to treat the subject satisfactorily without giving to it, in connexion with any other, a cumbrous and dispropor- tioned air. To hazard assertions, and to venture on the requisite plainness of criticism, without producing the evidence which justified a departure from received opinions could have effected no good purpose, and would have justly incurred, the charge of presumption. Error A 11 was too deeply intrenched to permit a hope of dislodging it, unless through the regular, though tedious, forms of investment. The author is very sensible of the dry and argumenta tive manner here imparted to topics which have usually been viewed, and treated, as susceptible of the highest embellishment. He can only hope that others may catch a feeling, such as gained on himself at every step, which, in the disentanglement of facts, rejects impa tiently, rather than solicits, whatever does not conduce directly to the result. The mind seems to demand, with sternness", that this labour shall first be gone through, as the eye requires a solid foundation, and an assured elevation, before it can rest with complacency on the decorative acanthus. Amidst a great deal of undeniably fine writing on the subject with which the present volume is connected, it would seem to have secured to itself less tha& any other of patient and anxious labour. The task of setting facts right has been regarded as an unworthy drudgery, while an ambitious effort is witnessed to throw them before the public eye in all the fantastic shapes, and deceptive colouring, of error. Gibbon remarks of Tille- mont, that his inimitable Accuracy " almost assumes the character of Genius." Many writers of the present day seem to have constantly in view the tendency of the public mind to a classification of powers, and to dread lest any remarkable display of the quality in question, might be artfully seized on as characteristic, and thus prejudice their claims to the highest honours of au thorship. A new and urgent motive may be suggested for en- Ill deavouring to clear up, as speedily as possible, the con fusion which has hence heen suffered to gather round the best established facts, and left their recognition or denial at the mercy of chance or caprice. While a salutary jealousy of extensive Combinations, in the Political World, distinguishes the present age, there has been organised in that of Letters, almost unobserved in this country, a confederacy which has gradually drawn to itself, and skilfully consolidated, a power that may now be pronounced truly formidable. It has already begun to speak out plainly the language of dictation. The great literary achievement of modern France the "Biographie Universelle" is at length brought to a close, completing by the fifty-second volume its triumph over the alphabet. It is a work destined, unquestion ably, to exercise an important influence over the Rights of the Dead of all Nations. When it stated that the list of contributors contains the names of more than three hundred writers of the highest literary eminence in France, from the year 1810, when the first volume appeared, to the present time, that every article is accompanied by the name of the author to whom it had been assigned in reference to his habitual studies, and that not a line appeared without having been pre viously submitted to several contributors in succession, it must be obvious that the character of such a work is matter of deep and universal interest. A Supplement is announced, in which notice will be taken of any inaccuracy, after which doubt and controversy must cease. " Les assertions ou les fails qu'on" n'y pas rectifies ou dementis devront par ce tnoyen ctre regardes comme a peu-pres incontestables et sans r^plique." IV Thus The Dead, of the most remote age, are sum moned to appear before this tribunal, and a charge is to be taken for confessed, unless an Answer be put in before the period (which yet is left indefinite) when the Sup plement shall go to press. We may smile at this sally of self-importance, but ought not to forget that the au thority of these volumes, whether for good or evil, will unquestionably be extensive and commanding. Facts, and with them reputation, cannot, it is true, be irre vocably stereotyped; yet a perilous circulation may be given to the erroneous version, and a work which will influence, directly or indirectly, a majority of those whose opinions constitute fame, it were idle to treat with contempt, and unjust not to attempt to rectify, where its statements disparage a national benefactor. It must be conceded that an omission of names can not fairly be laid to the charge of the Biographic Uni- verselle. The stream of time has been dragged with humane perseverance, and many who, it was supposed, had sunk to rise no more, are made to reappear at the surface. As to the more important question, how far, there are manifested, in general, extent and accuracy of knowledge, and skill in its display, it might be unjust to offer an opinion without going into much greater detail than is here practicable. But it is quite fair to assert that the many shameful marks of haste, heedless- ness and gross ignorance which it falls within the pre sent limited inquiry to expose and more particularly in bibliography which is the subject of especial vaunt may suffice to show how idle must be considered its claim to infallibility, even after the appearance of the Supplement. In the article devoted to the subject of the present Memoir, the generous conclusion is an nounced, after a tissue of errors, that although no evi dence exists to establish the scene of his discoveries, yet they ought not to be deemed altogether fabulous, as some historians would represent ("comme fabuleuses ainsi que quelques historiens ont ete tentes de le penser"). An effort is now made finally to secure his fame from the effects of either carelessness or malevolence. BOOK I. CHAP. I. THE HIGHEST NORTHERN LATITUDE REACHED BY CABOT AUTHORITIES COLLECTED BY HAKLUYT ATTEMPT TO EXPLAIN THEIR SUPPOSED DISCREPANCE. WITH a view to greater clearness, it is proposed to attempt, in the first instance, the settlement of certain points around which confusion has been suffered to gather, and which, de manding only a careful examination of authorities, may be advantageously considered apart from the narrative. The first question as one affecting materially the claim of Cabot to the character of an intrepid navigator is as to the point to which he urged his way in the north, a fact with re gard to which statements exist seemingly quite irreconcilable. The volumes of Hakluyt, usually regarded as of the high est authority, are supposed to present, on this subject, a chaos which, so far from lending assistance to clear up difficulties, rather dims, and threatens every moment to extinguish, the feeble light supplied from other quarters. In the " Chrono logical History of Voyages into the Arctic Regions, &c. by John Barrow, F. R. S.," it is said (p. 32), "there is no possible way of reconciling the various accounts collected by Hakluyt, and which amount to no less a number than six, but by supposing John Cabot to have made one voyage at least 8 previous to the date of the patent, arid some time between that and the date of the return of Columbus." The hypo thesis thus declared to be indispensable is directly at variance with the terms of the original patent, and with the language ol every original writer ; and an effort will, therefore, now be made to show, that the confusion complained of, does not exist in the materials for forming an opinion, but arises from tbe hasty and superficial manner in which they have been con sidered. Taking up the accounts in the order in which they stand, they may be thus stated (Hakluyt, vol. iii. p. 6). 1. " An extract from the map of Sebastian Cabot, cut by Clement Adams, concerning his discovery of the West Indies, which is to be seen in his majesty's privy gallery, at West minster, and in many other ancient merchants' houses." No thing is said in this as to the latitude reached. 2. " A discourse of Sebastian Cabot," &c., wherein the narrator asserts, that he heard the pope's legate say, that he had heard Cabot state, that he sailed only to the 56 of lati* tude, and then turned about. 3. A passage in the preface to the third volume of Ramusio't Collection of Voyages. In this, the author says that in a written communication to him Sebastian Cabot stated that he reached the latitude of 67 and a half. 4. Part of the sixth chapter of the third decade of Peter Martyr d'Angleria, in which nothing is said of the latitude reached, but the fact is stated, that he proceeded so far north, that it was " in manner continually day-light." 5. The statement of Francis Lopez Gomara, who, accord ing to Hakluyt, represents Cabot to have " sailed beyond the Cape of Labrador, until he found himself in 58 and better." Cabot is here also said to have found "the days very long, in a manner without any night, and for that short night that they had, it was very clear." 6. An extract from Robert Fabyan's Annals, and from a letter of Robert Thorn of Bristol, containing nothing as to the point under consideration. Thus it is apparenfr^that the discrepance exists on a com parison of the second, third and fifth items. Postponing Gomara for the present, we pause on the two passages of Ramusio which are supposed to embody contra dictory statements. It is obvious that if the present were an inquiry in a court of justice affecting the reputation or property of a living per son, the evidence which limits Cabot to 56 would be at once rejected as incompetent. The alleged communication from him is exposed, in its transmission, not only to all the chances of misconception on the part of the pope's legate, but admit ting that personage to have truly understood, accurately re membered, and faithfully reported what he heard, we are again exposed to a similar series of errors on the part of our inform ant, who furnishes it to us at second hand. But the dead have not the benefits of the rules of evidence ; and we must, therefore, look to the circumstances which affect its credi bility. It appears thus in Hakluyt: " A discourse of Sebastian Cabot touching his discovery of part of the West India out of England in the time of king Henry the Seventh, used to Galeacius Bu- trigarius, the pope's legate in Spaine, and reported by the sayd legate in this sort: " Doe you not understand, sayd he (speaking to certaine gentlemen of Venice), how to passe to India toward the North-west, as did of late a citizen of Venice* so valiant a man, and so well practised in all things pertaining to navigations, and the science of cosmographie, that at this present he hath not his like in Spaine, insomuch that for his vertues he is preferred above all other pilots that saile to the West Indies, who. may not passe- thithgr_without his license, and is .therefore called Pilotct Mayor, that is, the grand pilot ? And when- wfi. sayd that we knew him not, he proceeded, saying, that being certaine yeres in the city of Sivil, and desirous to have some knowledge of the navigations of the Spanyards, it was tolde him that there was in the city a valiant man, a Venetian borne, named Sebastian Cabot, who had the charge of those things, being an expert man in that science, and one that coulde make cardes fof the sea with his owne hand, and that by this report, seeking his acquaintance, he found him a very gentle person, who entertained him friendly, and shewed him many things-,- and among other a large mappe of the world, with certaine particuler navigations, as well of the Portugals as of the Spanyards, and that he spake further unto him to this effect: " When my father departed from Venice, many yeeres since, to dwell in Eng land, to follow the trade of marchandises, hee tooke mee with him to the citie of London, while I was very yong; yet having neverthelesse some knowledge of let ters of humanitie, and of the sphere And when my father died in that time B 10 when newcs were brought that Don Christopher Colanus Genoese had discovered the coasts of 'India, whereof was great talke in all the court of king Henry the Seventh, who then raigned, insomuch that all men with great admiration affirmed it to be a thing more divine than humane, to saile by the West into the East, where spices growe, by a way that was neuer knowen before, by this fame and report there increased in my heart a great flame of desire to attempt some notable thing- And understanding by reason of the sphere, that if I should, saile by way of the North-west, I should by a shorter tract come into India, I thereupon caused the king to be advertised of my devise, who immediately commanded two caravels to bee furnished with all things appertaining to the voyage, which was as farre as I remember in the yeere 1496, in the beginning of sommer. I began therefore to saile toward the North-west, not thinking to finde any other lande than -that of Cathay, and from thence to turn toward India; but after certaine dayes I found that the land ranne towards the north, which was to mee a great displeasure. Nev- erthelesse, sayling along by the coast to see if I coulde finde any gulfe that turned, I found the land still continent to the 56 degree under our pole. And seeing that there the coast turned toward the East, despairing to finde the passage, I turned backe againe, and sailed downe by the coast of that land toward the equinoctiall (ever with intent to finde the said passage t'o India), and came to that part of this firme lande which is now called Florida, where my victuals failing, I departed from thence and returned into England, where I found great tumults among the people, and preparation for warres in Scotland; by reason whereof there was no more consideration had to this voyage. " Whereupon I went into Spaine to the Catholique King, and Queene Elizabeth, which being advertised what I had done, entertained me, and at their charges fur nished certaine ships, wherewith they caused me to saile to discover the coastes of Brasile, where I found an exceeding great and large river, named at this present Rio de la Plata, that is, the river of silver, into the which I sailed and followed it into the firme land, more then six score leagues, finding it every where very faire, and inhabited with infinite people, which with admiration came running dayly to our ships. Into this river runne so many other rivers, that it is in maner incre dible. "After this I made many other voyages, which I no we pretermit, and waxing olde, I give myself to rest from such travels, because there are nowe many yong and lustle pilots and mariners of good experience, by whose forwardnesse I doe rejoyce in the fruit of my labours, and rest with the charge of this office, as you see." In giving this conversation to his readers, Hakluyt pro fesses to have derived it from the second volume of Ramusio, and subsequent compilers have assumed the accuracy of the reference. It seems, for the first time, to have occurred to the writers of the " Biographic Universelle," to look into the original, and they declare that no such passage is to be there found! " Hakluyt dans sa collection nous a transmis la piece ou 1'on trouve le plus de details sur la navigation et la vie de Sebastian Cabot. II dit 1'avoir tire*e du second 11 volume de la collection cle Ramusio; mais nous Vy avons cherchee en vain. Cette piece est attribute a Galearius Butrigarius legat du pape en Espagne qui dit tenir les particularites qu'elle contient d'un habitant de Cadiz lequel avait eu plusieurs conversations avec Sebastian.'* "Ramusio, con nu par son exactitude n'a donne" aucun extrait des navigations de Sebastian Cabot; Use contente de citer dans la preface de son 3 e volume un passage d'une Lettre qu'il avoit rejue de lui. A striking proof here occurs of the facility with which errors are fallen into in reporting even the written expressions of another when memory is relied on. The Collator ateurs of the Biographic Universelle are supposed to have just turned from the page of Hakluyt, and yet, in this brief state ment, mark the changes ! Butrigarius has no longer the con versation with Cabot, but gets his information at second hand, and this, too, from an inhabitant of Cadiz; thus utterly con founding both place and person, and making:, also, the com munication to have been the result of " many" conversations held with Cabot by this new member of the dramatis person^ the " habitant de Cadiz." All this too, from those who bit terly denounce their predecessors for carelessness and inac curacy ! But we have a yet more serious complaint to urge. When the charge is preferred against Hakluyt, of having made a fraudulent citation, we may be permitted to say, with some plainness, that after the lofty eulogium passed on Ramusio, by the associates of the Biographic Universelle, not only inci dentally here, but in the article subsequently devoted to him, it is .to the last degree discreditable, that a mere mistake of reference to the proper Volume, should have so completely baffled their knowledge of the work. Nor is the mention of Cabot confined, as they suppose, to the preface of the third volume : it occurs in five different places, as will be hereafter shown. The passage immediately in question will be found not in the second but in the first volume of Ramusio. It is part of the interesting article entitled, " Disco rso notabile sopra varii viaggi per liquali sono state condotte fino a tempi nostri le spetiarie," beginning at fol. 414. D. of the edition of 1554, and referred to in the index of all the editions under the titles 12 " Plata" and " Florida." Before proceeding to note the cir cumstances under which this conversation took place, it is proper to correct some of the errors of the translation found in Hakluyt. And first, surprise must have been felt at the manner in which Cabot speaks as to the date of his own celebrated voyage. The "-so farre as I remember" seems to indicate a strange indifference on the subject. The expression has passed into Purchas (vol. iii. p. 808), and all the subsequent authorities. In Harris's account (Voyages, vol. ii. p. 190), adopted by Pinkerton (vol. xii. p. 158), it is said, " The next voyage made for discovery was by Sebastian Cabot, the son of John ; concerning which, all our writers have fallen into great mistakes, for want of comparing the several accounts we have of this voyage, and making proper allowances for- the manner in which they were written, since I cannot find there was ever any distinct and clear account of this voyage pub lished, though it was of so great consequence. On the con trary, / believe that Cabot himself kept no journal of it by him, since in a letter he wrote on this subject, he speaks doubtfully of the very year in which it was undertaken." The same unlucky phrase continues down to Barrow (p. 33), and to a work published during the present year (Lardner's Cyclopaedia, History of Maritime Discovery, vol. ii. p. 137). .North West Foxe (p. 16) had changed it to what seemed, to that critical personage, more correct, " as neere as I can re member." Now there is not a syllable in the original to justify any such expression. " Feci intender questo mio pensiero alia Maesta del Re il qual fu molto contento et mi armo due caravelle di tutto cio che era dibisogno et fu del 1496 net principio della state" It will not be understood, that we consider Cabot to have named the year 1496; but it is only important here to negative an expression which seems to argue such a looseness of feeling as to this memorable incident. 13 It may not be without interest to show the source of Hakluyt's error. The first English writer on this subject is RICHARD EDEN, who published, in 1555, a black-letter volume, of which a good deal will be said hereafter, entitled, Decades of the New World, &e." It consists of a translation of the three first Books of Peter Martyr d'Angleria, to which he has subjoined extracts from various other works of an early date on kindred subjects; and amongst the rest, this passage of Ramusio is given (fol. 251), as found in " The Italian Hys- tories of Navigations." Eden was, as appears from his book, a personal friend of Cabot; and [when he came to the round assertion as to the date, 1496, 'which he knew to be incorrect, he qualified it by introducing (fol. 255) the words in question. It is the less excusable for Hakluyt nd the rest, to have blindly adopted such an interpolation, as there Were other translations within reach, in which a correct and elegant version is given of the passage. The " Biographic Univer- selle" considers Hakluyt as first bringing it forward, but the whole is found in the celebrated Collection of De Bry, pub lished ten years before. At the end of the second part of the Grand Voyages, is a cento of authorities on the sub ject of the discovery of America, in which the passage from Ramusio is correctly given. It is needless to say, that the " as farre as I remember " finds no place ; "anno igitur 1496, in principio veris ex Anglia solvi," Bare justice to Ramusio demands a reference to another passage in which the English translators have made him utter nonsense. The reader must have been struck with the ab surd commencement of the passage in Hakluyt " Do you not understand how to pass to India towards the North- West, as did, of late, a citizen of Venice, &c.;" after which, we are informed that this citizen of Venice abandoned the effort at 56 " despairing to. find the passage V 7 Ramusio must not be charged with this blunder, for the original is, adopts the higher number, and states Cabot to have reach ed 68. We proceed now to establish the proposition which stands at the head of this chapter, but must first disclaim for it a character of novelty, since in Anderson's History of Commerce, (vol. i. p. 549), is found the following passage : " How weak then are the pretensions of France to the prior discovery of North America, by alleging that one John Verazzan, a Florentine, employed by their King, Francis I., was the first discoverer of those coasts, when that king did not come to the crown till about nineteen years after our Cabot's discovery of the whole coast of North America, from sixty-eight degrees north, down to the south end of Florida? So that, from beyond Hudson's Bay (into which Bay, also, Cabot then sailed, and gave English names to several places therein) southward to Florida, the whole compass of North America, on the Eastern coast thereof, does, by all the right that prior discovery can give, belong to the Crown of Great Britain: ex cepting, however, what our monarchs have, by subsequent treaties with other Eu ropean powers, given up or ceded." The same assertion appears in the work as subsequently enlarged into Macpherson's Annals of Commerce (vol. ii. p. 12). The statement is sufficiently pointed ; and it is not imposs ible, that Anderson, who wrote seventy years ago, and whose employments probably placed within his reach many curious documents connected with the early efforts to discover a North- West passage to India, may have seen one of Cabot's maps. As he is silent with regard to the source of his in formation, it is necessary to seek elsewhere for evidence on the subject. 28 A conspicuous place is, on many accounts, due to the testi mony of Lord Bacon. Every student of English History is aware of the labour and research he expended on the History of Henry VII. He himself, in one of his letters, speaking of a subsequent tract, says, " I find Sir Robert Cotton, who poured forth what he had in my other work, somewhat dainty of his materials in this." We turn, then, with eagerness, to his statement as to Sebastian Cabot. ' ' He sailed, as he affirmed at his return, and made a card thereof, very far westward, with a quarter of the north on the north side of Terra de Labrador, until he came to the lati tude of sixty-seven degrees and a half, finding the seas still open." It would toe idle to accompany this statement with any thing more than a request that a map of that region may be looked at in connexion with it. The tract of Sir Humphrey Gilbert, on the North- West passage, was originally published in 1576. It is reprinted, with mutilations which will be mentioned hereafter, in Hak- luyt. Referring, for the present, to the latter work, we find at page 16 of the third volume, the following passage: " Furthermore, Sebastian Cabot, by his personal experience and travel, hath set forth and described this passage in his Charts, which are yet to be seen in the Queen's Majesty's Privy Gallery at Whitehall, who was sent to make this discovery by King Henry the VII., and entered the same fret, affirming that he sailed very far westward with a quarter .of the north on the north side of Terra de Labrador, the llth of June, until he came to the septentrional latitude of sixty -seven degrees and a~half, and finding the sea still open, said that he might and would have gone to Cataia, if the mutiny of the master and mariners had not been." In the "Theatrum Orbis Terrarum" of the celebrated geographer Ortelius, will be found a map designated as "Ame rica sive Novi Orbis descriptio ;" in .which he depicts, with an accuracy that cannot be attributed to accident, the form of Hudson's Bay, and a channel leading from its northern ex tremity towards the pole. The publication preceded not only Hudson but Frobisher ; and Ortelius tells us that he had Cabot's map before him. Prefixed to his work is a list, alphabetically arranged (according to the Christian names), of 29 the authors of whose labours he was possessed, and amongst them is expressly mentioned Sebastian Cabot. The map was of the World, " Universalem Tabulam quam impressam seneis formis vidimus. The statement of the Portuguese writer Galvano, trans lated by Hakluyt, is curious, and though there is reason in many places to apprehend interpolation by Hakluyt, yet the epithet Deseado is plainly retained from the Portuguese ; sig nifying the desired or sought for. It is unquestionable that this account, though not perfectly clear, represents Cabot's extreme northern labour to; have been the examination of a bay and a river ; and from the name conferred, we may sup pose, that they were deemed to be immediately connected with the anxious object of pursuit. On the map of Ortelius, the channel running from the northern part of the bay has really the appearance of a river. After reaching the Ame rican coast, the expedition is said, by Galvano, to have gone straight northwards till they came into 60 of latitude, where the day is eighteen hours long, and the night is very clear and bright. There they found the aire colde, and great islands of ice, but no ground in an hundred fathoms sounding; and so from thence, finding the land to turn eastwards, they trended along by it, discovering all the bay and river named Deseado, to see if it passed on the other side. Then they sailed back againe, till they came to 38 toward the equinoc tial line, and from thence returned into England." (p. 33.) A writer whose labours enjoyed in their day no little cele brity, and may be regarded, even now, as not unworthy of the rank they hold in the estimation of his countrymen, is the noble Venetian, Livio Sanuto, whose posthumous " Geogra- fia," appeared at Venice, in 1588. The work, of which there is a copy in the library of the British Museum, owes its chief interest, at present, to certain incidental speculations on matters connected with Naval Science, of which the author was deeply enamoured. Repeated allusions occur to the map of " il chiarissimo Sebastiano Caboto." Having heard, moreover, from his friend Guido Gianeti de Fano, at one time 30 ambassador at London, that Sebastian Cabot had publicly ex plained to the King of England the subject of the Variation of the Needle, Sanuto became extremely anxious, in reference to a long meditated project of his own, to ascertain where Cabot had fixed a point of no variation. The ambassador could not answer the eager inquiry, but wrote, at the instance of Sanuto, to a friend in England, Bartholomew Compagni, to obtain the information from Cabot. It was procured accord ingly, and is given by Sanuto (Prima Parte, lib. i. fol. 2), with some curious corollaries of his own. The subject belongs to a different part of pur inquiry, and is adverted to here only to show the author's anxious desire for accurate and comprehensive information, and the additional value thereby imparted to the passage (Prima Parte, lib. ii. fol. 17), in which he gives an account of Cabot's voyage. corresponding minutely with that which Sir Humphrey Gilbert derived from the map hung up in Queen Elizabeth's Gallery.* Some items of circumstantial evidence maybe adverted to: Zeigler, in his work on the Northern Regions, speaking of the voyage of Cabot, and the statement of his falling in with so much ice, remarks (Argent ed. of 1532. fol. 92. b.) " Id testatur quod non per mare vastum, sed propinquis littoribus in sinus formam comprehensum navigarit, quando ob eadem caussam sinus Gothanus concrescat quoniam strictus est, et fluviorum plurium et magnorum ostia Salsam naturam in parva copia superant Inter autem Norduegiam et Islandiam non concrescit ex diversa causa, quoniam vis dulcium aquarum illic superatur vastitate naturae salsa." This testifieth that he had sailed not by the main sea, but in places near unto the land, comprehending and embracing the sea in form of a gulph; whereas for the same cause the Gulph of Gothland is frozen, because it is. straight and narrow, in the which, also, the little quantity of salt water is over come by the abundance of fresh water, of many and great rivers that fall into the gulph. But between Norway and Iceland the sea is not frozen, for the contrary cause, forasmuch as the power of fresh water is there overcome of the abundance of the salt water." (Eden's Decades, fol'. 268. ) * " E quivi a punto tra quest! dui extremi delle due Continent! giunto che fu il chiarissimo Sebastiano Caboto in gradi sessenta sette e rriezo navigando allora per la quarta di Maestro verso Ponente ivi chiaro vide essere il mare aperto e spatiosiss- ima senza veruno impedimento. Onde giudico fermaniente potersi di la navigare al Cataio Orientale il che ancho haverche a mano a mano fatto se la malignata del Padrone e de i marinari sollevati non lo havessero fatto ritornari h dietro." 31 Eden says, in a marginal note, " Cabot told ice is of fresh water and not of the sea." Great perplexity has been caused by the statement that the expedition under Cabot found the coast incline to the North- East. He himself informs us that he reached only to 56 N. lat., and that the coast in that part tended to the East. This seems hardly probable, for the coast of Labrador tends neither at 56 nor at 58 to the East." (Forster, p. 267.) So Nava- rette (torn. iii. p. 41) thinks that Ramusio's statement cannot be correct, because the. latitude mentioned would carry the vessel to Greenland. It is to be remembered, that the language of Cabot sug gests that at the immediate point of arrest he was cheered by the prospect of success. We are led, then, to infer that the sanguine adventurer was, for some reason, inspired with fresh confidence in which his associates refused to participate; and that, terrified by the perils they had encountered, their dis satisfaction came to a head when they found a new career of peril suggested by what they deemed the delusive hopes of their youthful commander. Let us look into the subject with the aid which these suggestions afford. Bylot, who, after penetrating into Hudson's Bay, proceeded up its Northern channel on the west side, as far as 65 and-a-half, represented the coast as tending to the North- east. The Quarterly Review (vol. xvi. p. 168), in an article urging a new expedition in search of the North- West passage, refuses its belief to this statement. We turn, then, to Captain Parry's Narrative of his Second Voyage. It is apparent from an inspection of the map that the course pointed out by Cabot, for passing through the Strait, would conduct a navigator, without fail, to Winter Island. Now, from the very outset of Captain Parry's course from that point, we find him engaged in a struggle with the North-Eastern tendency of the coast. On the 13th of July he was off Barrow's River, which is in lat. 67 18' 45"; and having visited the falls of that river, his narrative is thus con tinued: 32 " We found, on our return, that a fresh southerly breeze, which had been blow ing for several hours, had driven the ice to some distance from the land; so that at four, P.M., as soon as the flood tide had slackened, we cast off and made all poss ible sail to the northward, steering for a headland, remarkable for having a patch of land towards the sea insular in sailing along shore. As we approached this headland, which I named after my friend Mr Edward Leycester Penrhyn, the prospect became more and more enlivening; for the sea was found to be naviga ble in a degree very seldom experienced in these regions, and the land trending two or three points to the westward of north, .gave us reason to hope we should now be enabled to take a decided and final turn in that anxiously desired direction" Another remark is suggested by Captain Parry's Narrative. Every one who has had occasion to consider human testimony, or to task his own powers of recollection, must have observed how tenaciously circumstances remain which had affected the imagination, even after names and dates are entirely forgot ten. The statement of Peter Martyr exhibits a trophy of this kind. He r6calfe what his friend Cabot had said of the influence of the sun on the shore along which he was toiling amidst mountains of ice $. " vastas repererit glaciales moles pelago natantes et lucem fere perpetuam tellure tamen libera gelu liquefacto" (Decades, iii. lib. 6), a passage which Hakluyt (vol. iii. p. 8), borrowing Eden's version, renders, " he found monstrous heaps of ic.e swimming on the sea, and in manner continual day-light; yet saw he the land in that tract free from ice, which had been molten by the heat of the sun.V Where do we look for this almost continual day-light, and this opportunity of noticing the appearance of the land? In that very channel, we would say, leading North from Hud son's Bay, where Captain Parry, later in the summer, whilst between 67 and 68, and threatened every moment with de struction, thus records his own impressions (p. 261): " Very little snow was now lying upon the ground, and numerous streams of water rushing down the hills and sparkling in the beams of the morning sun, relieved in some measure the me lancholy stillness which otherwise reigned on this desolate shore." There has been held in reserve the piece of evidence which goes most into detail. In the third volume of Hakluyt (p. 25), is found a Tract, 33 by Richard Willes, gentleman, on the North- West passage. It was originally published in an edition, that Willes put forth in 1577, of Richard Eden's Decades, and forms part of an article therein, which Hakluyt has strangely mangled, ad dressed to Lady Warwick, daughter of the Earl of Bedford. It was drawn up, as we shall have occasion to show, for the use of Sir Martin Frobisher. In this tract Willes combats the various arguments urged at that time against the practi cability of the enterprise; and his statement of one of the objections advanced, furnishes an all important glimpse at the map of Cabot. In the following passage (3 Hakluyt, p. 25), the enemies of the enterprise are supposed to say: < Well, grant the West Indies not to continue continent unto the Pole. Grant there be a passage between these two lands; let the gulf lie nearer us than com monly in Cardes we find it, namely, between 61 and 64 degrees north, as Gemma Frisius, in his maps and globes, imagineth it, and so left by our countryman, Se bastian Cabot, in his Table, which the Earl of Bedford hath at Cheynies;* let the way be void of all difficulties, yet, &c. &c." And, again, Willes, speaking in his own person, says (3 Hakluyt, p.26): " For that Caboto was not only a skilful seaman but a long traveller, and such a one as entered personally that straight, sent by King Henry VII. to make this afore said discovery as in his own Discourse of Navigation you may read in his Card, drawn with his own hand, that the mouth of the North Western Straight lieth near the 318 meridian, between 61 and 64 degrees in the elevation, continuing the eame breadth about ten degrees West, where it openeth southerly more and more." It is scarcely necessary to remind the reader that, until a comparatively recent period, longitude was measured, univer sally from Ferro, once supposed to be the most western part of the World; and that the computation of degrees from that point proceeded first over the old World, and thus made its journey of 360 degrees. Adding together, then, the 42 de grees which complete the circuit, and the distance between Ferro and Greenwich, we have within a few minutes, 60 west from Greenwich as the longitude named; and if we note * On application in the proper quarter, it has been ascertained that this Docu ment cannot, after diligent search, be found. E 34 on a modern map, where that degree of longitude crosses Labrador, it will be seen how little allowance is necessary fop the "about 318," which Willes, somewhat vaguely, states as the commencement of the strait. He probably judged by the eye of that fact, and of the distance at which the strait began to "open southerly/' A pause was, designedly, made in the midst of Willes's statement in order to separate what refers to' Cabot's Map from his own speculations. The paragraph quoted concludes thus : " Where itopeneth southerly more and more until it come under the tropic of Cancer, and so runneth into Mar del Sur, at the least 18 degrees more in breadth there, than it was where it first began; otherwise, I could as well imagine this passage to be more unlikely than the voyage to Moscovia, and more impossible than it, for the far situation and continuance thereof in the frosty dime." That Cabot represented the strait as continuing in the de gree mentioned, or as presenting a southern route, is incredi ble, .because we know that he was finally arrested at 67 de grees and-a-half whilst struggling onward. But the object of Willes was to meet the objection' of those who contended that even supposing a passage could be found so far to the North yet the perils of the navigation must render it useless for the purposes of commerce. He represents them as say ing (Hakluyt, vol. iii. p. 25): "If any such passage be, it lieth subject unto ice And snow for the most part of the year. Before the sun hath warmed the' air and dissolved the ice each one well knoweth that there can be no sailing. The ice once broken, through the con tinual abode the sun maketh a certain season in those parts, how shall it be possi ble for so weak a vessel, as a ship is, to hold out amid whole islands, as it were, of ice continually beating on each side, and at the mouth of that gulf issuing dov/n furiously from the North, &c." Willes, therefore, artfully concedes, as has been seen, the force of the objection, but attempts to elude it by adverting to the form of the Bay, and arguing that the break to the South held out the prospect of a safer route. In this effort he derived important assistance from the maps of Gemma 35 Frisiiis and Tramezine, both of which are yet extant, and really do make the strait expand to the South, and fall into the Pacific precisely in the manner he describes. He, there fore, couples the delineation of Cabot, from actual observa tion, with the conjectures of others, and draws certain infer ences, " if the Gardes of Cabota and Gemmi Frisius, and that which Tramezine imprinted be true" (3 Hakluyt, p. 28). There is no difficulty, as has been said, in making the separa tion, when we advert to the fact that Cabot was actually at 67 degrees and-a-half, when the alarm of his associates com pelled him to turn back. The -representation of Cabot may, in point of accuracy, be advantageously contrasted with that of more recent maps. Thus, on the one found in Purchas (vol. iii. p. 852), the 318th degree of longitude passes through nearly the middle of the "Fretum Hudson." In the "Voyages from Asia to America, for completing the discoveries of the North- West Coast of America," published^ at London, in 1764, with a translation of S. Mulleins Tract, as to the Russian discoveries, there is a map by " Thomas Jeiferys, Geographer to his Ma jesty," taken from that published by the Royal Academy of Sciences at St Petersburg. The old mode of computation is observed, and the 318th degree of longitude dpes not touch Labrador, but passes to the eastward of it. Such is the evidence which exists to establish the fact ass umed as the title of this chapter. There remains one obvi ous and striking consideration. Had Cabot been disposed to fabricate a tale to excite the wonder of his contemporaries, not only were the means of detection, abundant, but he as suredly, would not have limited himself to 67 degrees and- a-half. To a people familiar with the navigation to Iceland, Norway, &c. , there was nothing marvellous in his represen tation ; nay, Zeigler, as we have seen, will not believe that great mountains of ice could have been encountered in that latitude. It is only by knowing the navigation of the Strait, 36 and Bay, and northern channel* that we can appreciate the difficulties he had to overcome, and the dauntless intrepidity that found a new impulse in perils before which his terrified companions gave way. CHAP. IV. FlfcST WORK OF HAKLUYT MAPS AND DISCOURSES LEFT BY SEBASTIAN CABOT ATX HIS DEATH READY FOR PUBLICATION. AN early work of Hakluyt, to which frequent reference will be made, contains a great deal of curious information, not to be found elsewhere, and is exceedingly important as a check on his subsequent volumes. It furnishes, moreover, honourable evidence of the zeal with which he sought to ad vance, on every occasion, the interests of navigation and dis covery. The following is its title : " Divers voyages touching the discoverie of America and the Islands adjacent unto the same, made first of all by an Englishman, and afterwards by the Frenchmen and Britons : and certain notes of advertisements, for observations necessary for such as shall hereafter make the like attempt, with two mappes annexed hereunto, for the plainer understanding of the whole matter. Imprinted at London, for Thomas Wood cock, dwelling in Paule's Churchyard, at the signe of the Black Beare, 1582," A reference will be found to it in the margin of p. 174. vol. iii. of Hakluy t's larger work. Dr Didbin, in his Library Oompanion (2d ed. p. 392), says, "I know of no other copy than that in the collection of my neighbour, Henry Jadis, Esq., who would brave all intervening perils between Indus and the Pole, to possess himself of any rarity connected with Hakluy t."* There is a copy in the Library of the British * It may be inferred that we are not quite such enthusiasts as the gentleman referred to; thoie who are will find amongst the Harleian MSS. (No. 288, Art 111) a very curiou* autograph letter from Hakluyt, dated Paris, July 1588, relative to an overture from France. 38 Museum, arranged, however, in the Catalogue, not to the title, Hakluyt, but "America." It is dedicated to "The Right Worshipful, and most vertuous Gentleman, Master Philip Sydney, Esq." Zouch, in his Life of Sir Philip Syd ney (p. 317), thus refers to it: " Every reader conversant in the annals of our naval transactions, will cheerfully acknow ledge the merit of Richard Hakluyt," &c. "His incompa rable industry was remunerated with every possible encour agement, by Sir Francis Walsingham and Sir Philip Sydney. To the latter, as a most generous promoter of all ingenious and useful knowledge, he inscribed his first collection of voy ages and discoveries, printed in 1582." In a passage to the dedication he adverts to the English title to America: " I have here, right worshipful, in this hastie work, first put downe the Title which we have to that part of America, which is from Florida to 67 degrees northward, by the letters patent, granted to John Cabote and his three sons, Lewis, Se bastian, and Santius, with Sebastian's own certificate to Bap- tista Ramusio, of his discovery of America." One Tract preserved in this volume, and which does not appear in the work as afterwards enlarged, is of great curio sity. It is a translation, published originally in 1563, of the detailed report made to Admiral Coligny by Ribault, who commanded the French expedition in 1562, to Florida, with a view to a settlement, and who actually planted in that year a French colony in what is now the state of South Carolina. Subsequently to the publication of this volume, Hakluyt was instrumental in causing to be published at Paris, in 1587, the volume of Basanier containing the Narrative of Laudonniere, who was second in command under Ribault. A comprehen sive view is there given of all the voyages, and Hakluyt, therefore, in his larger work, omits the interesting report made by the chief of the expedition. It is not a little remarkable, in reference to an incident so memorable, that the work of Ribault seems to be quite un known in France. The "Biographic Universelle" (title Ri- 39 bault) has a long article which manifests an entire ignorance of its existence, and is, indeed, written in a very careless manner. Thus, it is stated, that Ribault, after reaching Flo rida, proceeded northward along the coast, and landed at the mouth of a river where he placed a Pillar with the Arms of France, and that to the next river he gave the name of May. This is not only contrary to Ribault's account, but to that of Laudonniere (Basanier's Paris ed. of 1587, fol. 8. also, 3 Hakluyt, p. 308), and to the theory of the Biographic Uni- verselle itself which identifies the May with the present St John, The mistake throws into confusion what in the origi nal cannot be mistaken. It was on the river where he planted the Pillar that the name of May was conferred. Ribault,, in this Tract, referring to the several navigators who had visited America^ speaks of the " very famous" Sebastian Cabot, "an excellent pilot, sent thither by King Henry VII., in the year 1498." Hakluyt speaks of it as " translated by one Thomas Hackit," and remarks, "The Treatise of John Ribault is a thing that hath been already printed, but not no we to be had unless I had caused it to be printed againe." The work, however, as originally published by Hackit, iu London, in 1563, is in the Library of the British Museum (title in Cata- logue y Ribault). It is more excusable in the French Biogra pher of Ribault, not to know of an important Memoir pre pared by him, and which is found in the Lansdowne Manu scripts, on the policy of preserving peace with England, and of delivering up to her certain ports of France. It was, doubtless, prepared under the eye of Coligny, and transmit ted by him to show the views of his party; and has an inti mate connexion with the history of France at that period. Passing, however, at present, from various items of this curious volume, to which occasion will be taken hereafter to refer, there is to be noticed a passage of the deepest interest in reference to the subject of this memoir. Great surprise has been expressed that Cabot should have left no account of his voyages, as this circumstance has even been urged against him as a matter of reproach. Sebastian, with all his know- 40 ledge, and in the course of a long life, never committed to writing any narrative of the voyage to North America. The curious on the Continent, however, drew from him in conver sation various particulars which gave a general idea," &c. (Historical account of North America, &c., by Hugh Mur ray, Esq., vol. i. p. 66.) Let us see how far the reproach on Cabot may be retorted on his country. In this work of 1582, after citing the patent granted by Henry VII. and the testimony of Ramusio, Hakluyt says : " This much concerning Sebastian Cabote's discoverie may suffice for a present .taste, but shortly, God willing-, shall come out in print ALL HIS OWN MAPPES land DISCOURSES drawne andvjritten by himselfe, which are in the custodie of the worshipful Master William Worthington, one of her Majesty's Pensioners, wJio (because SO WORTHIE MONUMENTS should not be buried in perpetual oblivion) is very willing to suffer them to be overseene, and published in as good order as may be to the encouragement and benefite of our countrymen." It may be sufficient here to say of William Worthington, that he is joined with Sebastian Cabot, in the pension given by Philip and Mary, on the 29 May 1557 (Rymer, vol. xv. p. 466). The probable fate of the Maps and Discourses will be considered on reaching the painful part of Cabot's personal history which belongs to this association. 41 CHAP. V. COMPARATIVE AGENCY OF JOHN AND SEBASTIAN CABOT. IT has been seen, that by all the early writers, heretofore cited, who speak of the discoveries effected under the aus pices of Henry VII., Sebastian Cabot is exclusively named. An inclination has, in consequence, sprung up at a more remote period to dwell on the circumstances which seem to indicate that injustice had been done to the father ; and the alleged testimony of Robert Fdbyan, the venerable annalist, is particularly relied on. The feeling which prompts this effort to vindicate the pre tensions of the father is entitled to respect; and certainly there can exist, at this late day, no other wish on the subject than to reach the truth. It is proposed, therefore, to look with this spirit into the various items of evidence which are supposed to establish the prevailing personal agency of John .Cabot. They may be ranked thus : 1. The alleged statement of Robert Fabyan. 2. The language of more recent writers as to the character of the father. 3. The appearance of his name on the map cut by Clement Adams, and also in the patents. As to the first, the authority usually referred to is found in Hakluyt (vol. 3. p. 9) " A note of Sebastian Cabot's first discoverie of part of the Indies taken out of the latter part of Robert Fabian's Chroniclei not hitherto printed, which is in the custodie of M. John Stow, a diligent preserver of antiquities." " In the 13 yeere of K. Henry the 7 (by means of one John Cabot, a Venetian, which made himselfe very expert and cunning in knowledge of the circuit of the world, and islands of the same, as by a sea card and other demonstrations rea sonable he shewed), the kiner caused to man and victuall a ship at Bristow to search 42 for an island, which he said he knew well was rich, and replenished with great commodities: which shippethns manned and victualled at the King's costs, divers marchants of London ventured in her email stocks, being in her, as chief patron, the said Venetian. And in the company of the said ship sailed, also, out of Bris- tow, three or foure small ships, fraught with sleight and grosse marchandizes, as course cloth, caps, laces, points, and other trifles, and so departed from Bristow in the beginning of May, of whom in this Maior*s time returned no tidings." There is added, by Hakluyt, a note of three savages brought from the newly-discovered region, " mentioned by the foresaid, Robert Fabian." It may be remarked, in the first place, that the history of this " latter part of Robert Fabyan's Chronicle," well de serves the attention of antiquaries. Both Stow, in his Annals, subsequently published, and after him, Speed (p. 744), and Purchas (vol. iii. p. 808), speak of the exhibition, in 1502, of savages brought from the Newfoundland, and cite Fabyan, as authority for what is not to be found in his work as we now have it.* Assuming, however, as we may safely do, that Stow was possessed of a manuscript which he had reason to believe the work of a contemporary, the question remains as to its precise language. The passage in Hakluyt would evi dently appear to be not an exact transcript from such a work. The expression, " of whom in this Mayor's time returned no tidings," is not in the manner of a Chronicler making a note of incidents as they occurred, but is very natural in a person looking over the materials in his possession for information on a particular point, and reporting to another the result of that examination. It is probable, therefore, that Hakluyt had asked Stow what light he could throw on the expeditions in the time of Henry VIL, and that we have here the answer given to the inquiry. From what has already been seen, it maybe conceived that Hakluyt would not hesitate to run his pen through whatever struck him as irreconcilable with the leading facts in his possession. The wealthy Prebendary would approach with no great reverence the labours of poor Stow, who having abandoned his business as a tailor, for the * See Appendix (A). 43 unrequited labours of an antiquary, was reduced to such dis tress, that, through the royal munificence, a special license was granted to him to beg at the church doors. If, there fore, Hakluyt found the son's name introduced, he would not hesitate to make it give way to what he deemed the better evidence supplied by the record. Fortunately, however, we are not left to mere conjecture. In 1605 appeared S tow's own " Annals." The simplicity and good faith of this writer are so well known, as well as his intense reverence for what ever bore the stamp of antiquity, that we have no fear of his having committed what in his eyes would have been sacrilege, by changing one syllable of the original. Let it be remem bered, then, that Hakluyt relies exclusively on what he ob tained from Stow ; and in reading the following passage from the Annals, we find what, doubtless, passed into Hakluyt's hands before it was subjected to his perilous correction. It occurs at p. 804 of the edition of 1605, and at p. 483 of that of 1631 . < < This year one Sebastian Gaboto, a Genoa's sonne borne in Bristol, professing himself to be expert in the know ledge of the circuit of the world and islands of the same, as by his charts and other reasonable demonstrations he shewed, caused the king to man and victual a ship," which we cite on the possibility that it may do no more than an act of justice, and because it serves to show how uniformly the claims of England in America have been rested ott the discoveries in the time of Henry VII. " The first discovery of these coasts (never heard of before), was well begun by John Cabot the father, and Sebastian his son, an Englishman bom, Sec. all which they brought and annexed unto the crown of England." " For not long after that Christopher Columbus had discovered the Islands and Continent of the West Indies for Spain, John and Sebastian Cabot made discovery also of the rest from Florida Northwards, to the behoof of England." The French did but re view that before discovered by the English Nation, usurping upon our right" " Then seeing the English nation only hath right unto these countries of America, from the Cape of Florida Northward, by the privilege of first discoveiy, unto which Cabot was authorised by regal authority, and set forth by the expense of our late famous King Henry VII. , which right, also, seemeth strongly defended on our be half by the bountiful hand of Almighty God, notwithstanding the enterprises of other nations, it may greatly encourage us upon so just ground as is our right," &c. The fact that the father is named in the Patent does not furnish conclusive evidence that he embarked in -either of the expeditions. The original grant conveys to him and his three sons, "and to the heirs of them and their Deputies," full power to proceed in search of regions before unknown, and the exclu sive privilege of trading. Now it has never been supposed that all the sons engaged in the voyage, and yet the presump tion is just as strong with regard to each of them as to the father, and even more so if we look to the appropriate sea son of life for perilous adventure. The truth seems to be this: as it is probable that all the means of the family were 49 embarked in this enterprise, it was no unnatural precaution that the patent should he coextensive in its provisions. It created them a trading corporation with certain privileges, and it might as well be contended, for a similar reason, that the Marquis of Winchester, the Earl of Arundel, and the other patentees of the Muscovy Company (1 Hakluyt, p. 268) actually sailed in the north-eastern voyages. The second patent is to the father alone. If we seek a reason for this de parture from the original arrangement, it may be conjectured that some of the sons chose to give a different direction to a 'parental advance and their personal exertions, and that the head of the family thought fit to retain, subject to his own discretionary disposal, the proposed investment of his remain ing capital. It is said* that one of the sons settled at Ve nice, and the other at Genoa. The recital of the discovery by lite Father would, of course, be stated, under the circum stances, as the consideration of the second patent in his favour. Another reason for the introduction of the father's name, concurrently at first with his son's, and afterwards exclu sively, may perhaps be found in the very character of the King, whose own pecuniary interests were involved in the result. He might be anxious thus to secure the responsibility of the wealthy Venetian for the faithful execution of the terms of the patent, and finally think it better to have him solely named, rather than commit powers, on their face assignable, to young men who had no stake in the country, and who were not likely to make it even a fixed place of residence. On the whole, there may at least be a doubt whether the father really accompanied the expedition. Unquestionably, the great argument derived from the pretended language of a contemporary annalist is not only withdrawn, but thrown into the opposite scale. Supposing, however, John Cabot to have been on board, * Campbell's Laves of the Admirals, vol. i. p. 310, on thfi authority of MS. re marks on Hakluyt. G 50 we must, in inquiring what were his functions, carefully put aside the thousand absurdities which have Jiad their origin in misconception as to the person intended by Fabyan; and re member, that we have not a tittle of evidence as to his cha racter or past pursuits, except, as has been remarked, that he came to London " to follow the trade of merchandise." All that is said about his knowledge of the sphere his perfect acquaintance with the sciences, &c., is merely an amplifica tion of the remarks of Fabyan, as to Sebastian Cabot. If, then, he went at all, it was in all probability merely for the purpose of turning to account his mercantile skill and saga city in the projected traffic which formed one of the objects of the expedition. There is nothing to control, in the slight est degree, the idea which presses on us from so many quar ters, that the project had its origin with the son, and that its great object was to verify his simple, but bold proposition, that by pushing to the north a shorter route might be opened to the treasures of Cataya. . If the youth of Sebastian Cabot be objected to, as render ing his employment by Henry improbable, we must remem ber that the project was suggested to the English monarch at a period peculiarly auspicious to its reception. He had just missed the opportunity of employing Columbus, and with it the treasures of the New World. Instead of cold and cheer less distrust, there was a reaction in the public mind, with a sanguine flow of confidence towards novel speculations and daring enterprises. When, therefore, one-fifth of the clear gain was secured to the king, by the engagement of the wealthy Venetian, Henry yielded a ready ear to the bold theory and sanguine promises of the accomplished and enthusiastic young navigator. 51 CHAP. VI. FIRST POINT SEEN BY CABOT NOT NEWFOUNDLAND. THE part of America first seen and named by Cabot, is gene rally considered to have been the present Newfoundland. This, however, will be far from clear if we look closely into the subject. The evidence usually referred to as establishing the fact consists of an " extract taken out of the map of Sebastian Cabot, cut by Clement Adams," quoted by Hakluyt and Pur- chas. This would seem to have been a broad sheet, on which an attempt was made to exhibit the substance of Cabot's state ment as to the country he had discovered. From the stress laid by Hakluyt and Purchas upon the Extract, hung up in the privy gallery at Whitehall,* we may infer that they had never seen the original map. It would seem to have been executed after Cabot's death, and without any communication with him, for it offers conjectures as to his reasons for giving names to particular places which probably would not have been hazarded with the means so readily at hand, during his life, of attaining certainty on such points. The explanation was in Latin, and is thus given by Hakluyt, with a translation (vol. iii. p. 6) Anno Domini 1497, Joannes Cabotus Venetus, et Sebastianus illius films earn terrain fecerunt perviam, quam nullus prius adire ausus fuit, die 24 Junii, circiter horam quintam bene mane. Hanc autem appellavit Terram primum visam, credo quod ex mari in earn partem primum oculos injecerat. Namque ex ad- verso sita est insula, earn appellavit insulam Divi Joannis, hac opinor ratione, * The disappearance of this curious document may probably be referred, either to the sales which took place after the death of Charles I., or to the fire in the reign of William III. 52 quod aperta fuit eo qui die est sacer Diuo Joanni Baptists: Hujus incola pelles animalium exuviasque ferarum pro indumentis habent, casque tanti faciunt, quanti nos vestes preciosissimas. Cum bellum gerunt, utuntur arcu, sagittas, hastis, spiculis, clavis ligneis et fundis. Tellus sterilis est, neque ullos fructus affert, ex quo fit, ut ursus albo colore, et cervis inusitatte apud nos magnitudinis referta sit: piscibus abundat, iisque sane magnis, quales sunt lupi marini et quos salmones vulgus appellat; soleae autem reperiuntur tarn longae, ut ulnse mensuram excedant. Imprimis autem magna est copia corum piscium, quos vulgari sermone vocant Bacallaos. Gignuntur in ea insula accipitres ita nigri, ut corvorum simi- litudinem mirum in modum exprimant, perdices autem et aquilac sunt nigri coloris." The same in English. '* In the year of our Lord 1497, John Cabot, a Venetian, and his sonne Sebas tian (with an English fleet set out from Bristoll), discovered that land which no man- before that time had attempted, on the 24th of June, about five of the clocke early in the morning. This land he called Prima vista, that is to say, first scene; because, as I suppose, it was that part whereof they had the first sight from sea. That island^ which lieth out before the land he called the Island of St John upon this occasion, as I thinke, because it was discovered upon the day of John the Baptist. The inhabitants of this island use to weare beasts* skinnes, and have them in as great estimation as we have our finest garments. In their warres they use bowes, arrowes, pikes, darts, woodden clubs, and slings. The soil is barren in some places, and yeeldeth little fruit, but it is full of white bears, and stagges far greater than ours. It yeeldeth plenty of fish, and those very great as scales, and those which we commonly call salmons; there are soles, also, above a yard in length, but especially there is great abundance of that kind of fish which the savages call baccalaos. In the same island also there breed hauks, but they are so black that they are very like to ravens, as also their partridges and eagles, which are in like sort blacke." As usual, it is necessary here, in the first place, to notice the passages in which Haklayt has acted unfaithfully to the text. He was under- an impression that Cabot first visited Newfoundland, and in this same volume that region is spoken of in very flattering terms, and its colonization earnestly re commended. At p. 153, we hear of Newfoundland * * There is nothing which our East and Northerly countries of Europe do yield, but the like also may be made in them as plentifully by time and industry, namely, rosin, flax, hemp, corn, and many more, all which the countries will afford, and the soil is apt to yield." " The soil along the coast is ndt deep of earth, bringing forth abundantly peason, small, yet good feeding for cattle. Roses, passing sweet," ex ad verso sita est In- sula" " that island which lieth out before the land." We must remark, further, that the present St John was so named by Cartier, in 1534 (3 Hakluyt, p. 204), he having been employed from the 10th May, when he reached Newfound land, to 24th June, in making a circuit of the Gulf which he entered through the strait of Belle Isle. But the most im portant, and conclusive piece of testimony, is furnished by Ortelius, who had the map of Cabot before him, and who places an island of St John in the latitude of 56 immediately on the coast of Labrador. This is, doubtless, the one sa de signated by Cabot. Thus, without calling to our aid the terms of the second patent to Cabot, which recites the discovery of a land and islands on the first voyage, we reach the conclusion, that the main discovery the "Terra," as distinguished from the " Insula" could not have been the present island of New foundland. There is little difficulty in tracing the history of this epithet. The whole of the northern region is designated, on the old maps, as Terra Nova, or New Land, and it has the appellation of "Newland," in the statute 33 Henry VIII. cap. ii.* * Ruffhead's Statutes at large, vol. ii. p. 304. 56 Robert Throne of Bristol, in 1527, speaking (Hakluyt, vol. i. p. 214) of the North-West passage, says, "and if they will take this course after they be past the Pole towards the West, they should go in the back of the Newfoundland which of late was discovered by your Grace's subjects, until they come to the back side and South Seas of the Indies Occidental;" and again (p. 219), "if between our Newfoundland^ or Norway, or Island, the seas toward the North be navigable, we should go to these Islands a shorter way by more than 2000 leagues." On the same page, he mentions the circumstance of his father having been one of the " discoverers of Newfoundland ;" at p. 216, refers to " the land that we found, which is called here (in Spain) Terra de Labrador," and in another part of the same document speaks of " the Newfound island that we discovered." The term, then, was employed, in the first instance, as a designation of all the English discoveries in the North. That it should afterwards settle down upon an inconsiderable por tion, and come to be familiarly so applied, will not appear surprising if we recollect, that for almost a century the whole region was known only as a fishing station, and regarded as an appendage to the Grand Bank, and that the island was used, exclusively, in connexion with such pursuits. When long established, these designations are beyond the reach of con siderations of taste or propriety. Thus, the term West Indies, once covering the whole of America, is now limited to groups of islands on its eastern side, even after a Continent and the Pacific Ocean are known to be interposed between them and that India in a supposed connexion with which the name had its origin. Parks and Squares may be laid out and named at will, but the familiar appellation of a thronged place of business will not yield even to an Act of Parliament \ ex- pellas furca tamen usque recurret." 57 CHAP. VII. CABOT DID NOT CONFER THE NAME " PRIM A VISTA." THE question as to the name Prima Vista stands apart from that which has just heen dismissed, and is in itself sufficiently curious. It is to be remembered, that the description in Latin, is not only the highest but the only authority on the subject, and that Hakluyt had no better materials for conjecture than we now possess. From this document we gather that John and Sebastian Cabot, " Earn terrain fecerunt perviam qiiam nullus prius adire ausus fuit die 24 Junii circiter horam quinism bene mane. Hanc autem appellavit Terrain primum visam credo quod ex man in earn partem primum oculos injecerak" A passage thus translated by Hakluyt " They discovered that land which ho man before that time had attempted, on the 24th June, about five of the clock, early in the morning. This land he called Prima Ftsta, that is to say, first seen, because as I suppose it was that part whereof they had the first sight from sea." It is plain^ that the original map could have furnished no clue to the motive for conferring the appellation, because the suggestion of the person who prepared the " Extract," is offered, confessedly, as a conjecture. We know only that there was something on the map which led him to consider the region as designated, " Terra primum visa." This bare statement will show how utterly gratuitous is Hakluyt's as sumption, that the name given was Prima Vista; for it is obviously impossible to determine, whether it was in Latin, Italian, or English. If the name Prima Vista, or Terra primum Visa, or First Sight, was conferred, why is nothing said of it in the various conversations of Sebastian Cabot? We hear continually of H 58 Baccalaos, and find that name on all the old maps, but not a word of the other, which yet is represented as the designa tion applied to the more important item of discovery to the "terra," as distinguished from the "insula." The origin of the misconception is suspected to have been this : The Map of the New World which accompanies the copy of Hakluyt's work, in the King's Library, has the fol lowing inscription on the present Labrador, " This land was discovered by John et Sebastian Cabote, for Kinge Henry VH., 1497." Now, the "Extract" which we are consider ing, says, that John and Sebastian Cabot first discovered the land " which no man before that time had attempted" (" quam nullus prius adire ausus fuit"). These expressions are, of course, intended to convey an assertion found on the original map, of which it professes to give an abstract an assertion equivalent, doubtless, to the language quoted from the map in Hakluyt. How would such an inscription run? Probably, thus: " Terra prirnum visa Joanne Caboto et Sebastiano illius filio die, 24 Junio, 1497, circiter horam quintam bene mane." To us who have just been called on to expose the absurd mistakes committed by men of the highest reputation for learning and sagacity, is it incredible, that the artist who prepared the broad sheet,, should have hastily supposed the initial words to be intended as a designation of the country discovered particularly, when in the Law, we have to seek at every turn a similar explanation of such titles, as Seire- facias, Mandamus, Quo Warranty &c. &c.? Such a designation might even have got into use without necessarily involving misconception. There is a tendency, in the absence of a convenient epithet, to seize, even absurdly^ on the leading words of a description, particularly when couched in a foreign language. Thus the earliest collection of voyages to the New World is entitled, " Paesi novamente retrovati et Novo Mondo da Alberico Vespucio Florentine intitulato." It is usually quoted as the "Paesi novamente retrovati," and a bookseller, therefore, when asked for ' < Land 59 lately discovered," exhibits a thin quarto volume, published at Vicenza, in 1507. The same is the case with the " Novus Orbis," the "Fc&dera," &c. Another consideration may be mentioned. The island which " stands out from the land" was discovered on the 24th June, and named from that circumstance. One would suppose this to have been first encountered; and if so, the designation of " First Sight," would hardly be given to a point subse quently seen on the same day. Not only were the chances in its favour from its position, but we cannot presume that Cabot would have quitted immediately his main discovery, had that been first recognized, and stood out to sea to examine a small island, or that he would have dedicated to the Saint the inferior, and later, discovery of the day. We repeat, all that is known on the subject is the appear ance of the three Latin words in question on the original map. The rest is mere conjecture ; first, of the artist, as to the meaning of the words, and then, of Hakluyt, yet wilder, that " Terra primum visa," must have been a translation of some thing in Italian* This solution explains why there is no reference to any such title in the conversations of Cabot, or in Ortelius wholiad the map of that navigator before him. It is not improbable, that Hakluyt was assisted to his con clusion by the prominence given on the early maps of New foundland to a name conferred by the Portuguese. Though he has not put into words the reflection which silently passed through his mind, it becomes perceptible in others who have adopted his hypothesis. Thus, for example, we recognise its vague influence on Forster (p. 267), who supposes "that Sebastian Cabot had the first sight of Newfoundland off Cape JBonavista." The subject seems, indeed, on every side, the sport of rash and even puerile conceits. Dr Robertson tells us (Hist, of America, book ix.), "after sailing for some weeks due West, and nearly on the parallel of the port from which he took his departure, he discovered a large Island, which he called 60 Prima Vista, and his tailors, Newfoundland/ and in a few days, he descried a smaller Isle, to which he gave the name of St John." Thu$ is presented, gratuitously, to the im agination, a sort of contest about names, between the com mander of the expedition and the plain-spoken Englishmen under his command. til CHAP. VIII. RICHARD EDEN/S "DECADES OF THE NEW WORLD" CABOT'S STATEMENT AS TO THE PLACE OF HIS BIRTH. As reference has already been made, more than once, to the volume of Eden, and there will be occasion to draw further on its statements, a few remarks may not be^out of place as to the claims which that rare and curious work presents to credit and respect. In selecting from the various tributes to its merits, that of Hakluyt, it is difficult to forbear a somewhat trite reflection on the fortuitous circumstances which influence the fate of books, as frequently as they are arbiters of fame and success in the pursuits of active life. * Eden has, in our view, far stronger claims to consideration as an author, and to the grateful recollection of his countrymen, than the writer whose testimony it is proposed to adduce in his favour. fHeJ preceded the other half-a- century, and was, indeed, the first Englishman who undertook to present, in a collective form^ the astonishing results of that spirit of maritime enterprise which had been everywhere awakened by the discovery of America. Nor was he a mere compiler. We are indebted to him for several original voyages of great curiosity and value. He is not exempt, as has been seen, from error, but in point of learning, accuracy, and integrity, is certainly superior to Hakluyt; yet it is undoubted, that while the name of the former, like that of Vespucci, has become indelibly associated with the new World, his predecessor is very little known. Hakluyt has contrived to transfer, adroitly, to his volumes, the labours of others, and to give to them an aspect artfully attractive to those for whom they were intended. The very title " Navigations, Voyages, Traffiques and 62 coveries of the English Nation?' is alluring, however inap propriate to the contents such an exclusive designation may be found ; and as the size and typographical execution of the work conspire to render the enterprise a very creditable one, for the early era of its appearance, the national complacency has rallied round it as a trophy, with a sort of enthusiasm. " It redounds," says Oldys, " as much to the glory of the English nation as any book that ever was published in it $" and Dr Dibdin, in the passage of his Library Companion, begin ning, " All hail to thee, Richard Hakluyt!" employs, in his way, a still higher strain of panegyric. For a decayed gen tleman, then, like Eden, it may not be wise to slight a pat ronising glance of recognition from one who stands so pros perously in the world's favour. To establish him, therefore, in the high confidence of most readers, it will be sufficient to find Hakluyt (vol. iii. p. 498) quoting a passage from " that learned and painefull writer, Richard Eden ;" and again (vol. i. p. 242) adverting to the sanction which Eden gives to the account of Chancellor's voy age. In the second volume (part ii. p. 10) other passages are copied from Eden's work. The extract from Peter Martyr d'Angleria, relative to Sebastian Cabot, given in the third volume (p. 8), is taken, without acknowledgement, from Eden's Translation (fol. 118, 119). As to the "Discourse" relative to the same navigator, given in Hakluyt (vol. iii. p. 6), he takes from Eden (fol. 255), every thing but the erroneous reference to the second volume of Ramusio, which is a blun der of his own, into which also he has led his copyist Pur- chas. The voyages to Guinea, found in Eden (fol. 343), are original, and were drawn up, as he says, " that sum memorie thereof might remayne to our postferitie, if eyther iniquitie of tyme, consumynge all things, or ignorance creepynge in by barbarousnesse, and contempte of knowledge, should hereafter bury in oblivion so woorthy attemptes." Hakluyt, in making the transfer ta his work (vol. ii. part ii. p. 9), retains the introductory expressions, without the slightest acknowledge^ 63 ment, so that our gratitude is directed to him, for having pre served an account of these voyages, and for the patriotic zeal which prompted the undertaking. This is the more calcu lated to mislead, as, immediately after these voyages, credit is given to Eden (p. 10), for a description of Africa; and the reader, noting a temper apparently so fair and candid, at once pronounces original whatever is not expressly referred to others. There is a voyage in Hakluyt (vol. ii. part ii. p. 14), designated at the head of the page, as that of " M. John Lok," and the writer says, " my chief intent hath been to show the course of the same, according to the observation and ordinary custom of the Mariners ; and as I received it at the hands of an expert Pilot, being one of the chief in this voyage." No one, unacquainted with Eden, would suppose, that this is copied, verbatim, from his volume (fol. 349). So, in refer ence to the unfortunate Portuguese, Pinteado, who sailed from Portsmouth, when we find in Hakluyt (vol. ii. part ii. p. 14), "all these aforesaid writings I saw under seal in the house of my friend, Nicholas Liete, with whom Pinteado left them," there is no intimation that he is merely repeating the language of Eden (fol. 349). Again, in Eden (fol. 357), is a curious account, which Chancellor gave him, of a waterspout, by which Cabot had been placed in imminent peril. This also is found in Hakluyt (vol. ii. part ii. p. 21), without ac knowledgement, and wears there the appearance of a direct communication to himself. Somewhat less than one-half of Eden's work is occupied with an English version of Peter Martyr. Then come trans lations from the most rare and curious accounts of voyages and travels, Oviedo, Gomara, Ramusio, Pigafeta, Americus Ves- putius, Munster, Bastaldus, Ziglerus, Cardanus, Paulus Jovius, Sigismondus Liberus, Vannuccius Biringuczius. Amongst the articles most worthy of attention, may be mentioned those on metals and the working of mines in ancient and modern times (fol. 326 to 342), on the prices of precious stones and spices, and the trade in spices (fol. 233, 244), on Russia 64 (fol. 249 to 263), and on the manners and customs of the Tar tars (fol. 299, Ac.). The circumstances which first inspired the author with a resolution to prepare the work, are told with much simplicity. He was a spectator of the public entry into London of Philip and Mary. As the splendid pageant swept by, in all its pomp, pride, and circumstance, amidst the tumultuous accla mations of the populace, the array of functionaries civil and military, and the deafening bursts of martial music, he de scribes himself as almost lifted out of self-command by the excitement of the scene, and at the crisis when the royal pair actually passed near him as ready to break out into some wild sally of enthusiasm. Restrained, happily, from this piece of indiscretion^ he resolved to set about some work which he might, in due season, exhibit as the offspring of his teeming loyalty, and humbly crave for it the royal blessing.* Of the success of the work, on its appearance, we know nothing ; but it seems to have struggled with many difficul ties in its progress to the light, arid of these not the least mortifying to Eden must have been the disheartening timidity of his publishers. It were injustice not to render a passing tribute of gratitude to the liberality of one of them, < < Mas ter Toy," without, however, attempting to lift the veil which a gentle and generous temper has thrown over the infirmity of his associates. Eden's pecuniary disinterestedness, his earnest hope that his labours might be useful to others, and 'Cum in primo vestro ingressu in hanc celeberriman Londini urbem (illus- trissimi Principes) cernerem quanto omnium applausu, populi concursu, ac civium frequentia, quanto insuper spectaculorum nitore, nobilium virorum splendore, equorum multitudine, tubarum clangore, coeterisque magnificis pompis ac tri- umphis, pro dignitate vestra accepti estis dum omnes quod sui est cfficii facere satagebant, ubi in tanta hominum turba vix unus reperitatur qui non aliquid agendo adventum vestrum gfatulabatur, ccepi et ego quoque aliorum exemplo (proprius prsesertim ad me accedentibus Celsitudinibus vestris) tanto animi ardore ad ali quid agendum accendi ne solus in tanta hominum corona otiosus vrderer quod vix me continebam quin in aliquant extemporariam orationem temere erupuissemt nisi et prasentise vestrze majestas et mea me obscuritas a tarn audaci facinore deteruissent. Vcrum cuih postea penitius de hac re mecum cogitassem, &c." 65 his honest anxiety for merited reputation, serve to heighten our indignation at the manner in. which he has been unde servedly supplanted and thrust from the public view. ' The partners at whose charge this booke is prynted, although the coppy, whereof they have wrought a long space have cost, them nought, doo not, neverthe less, cease, dayly, to caule uppon me to make an end and proceede no further ; affirmynge that the booke will bee of so great a pryce, and hot every man's mo ney 5 fearying rather theyr losse and.hynderance than carefuU to be beneficial to other, as is now in manner the trade of all men, which ordinarie respecte of pri vate commoditie hath at thys time so lytUe moved me, I take God^to witness that for my paynes and travayles taken herein, such as they bee, I may uppon just occasion thynke myself a looser manye wayes, except such men of good inclination as shall take pleasure and feele sum commoditie in the. knowledge of these thinges shall thynke me woorthy theyr goode worde, wherewith I shall repute myselfe and my travaylesv so abundantly satisfyed, that I shall repute other men's gains a recom pense for my losses" (fol. 303). Again, "and to have sayde thus much of these vyages it may suffice 5 for (as I have sayd before),,wheras the partners at whose charges thys booke is prynted, wolde long since have me proceaded no further, I had not thought to have wrytten any thynge of these viages [to Guinea], but that the liberalise of Master Toy encouraged me to attempt the same, whiche I speake not to the reproache of other ia whom I thynke there lacked no good wyll, but that they thought the booke would be too chargeable" (fol. 360). Compare the modest and ingenuous language of this excel lent personage with that of the well-fed and boastful Hakluyt, who, in the dedication of his translation of Galvano to Sir Robert Cecil, says, "And for ought I can see, there had no great matter yet come to light if Myselfe had not undertaken that heavie burden, being never therein entertained to any purpose, until I had recourse unto yourself, of whose spe cial favour and bountiful patronage I have been often muck encouraged, &c. &c." But the work is rendered yet more precious by information scattered through it, derived from the great seamen of that day with whom the author's turn of mind led him to associate. Sebastian Cabot he seems to have known familiarly, and one chapter (fol. 249) has, for part of its title, " lykewyse of the vyages of that woorthy owlde man Sebastian Cabote, yet livynge in England, and at this present the governor of the Company of the Marchantes of Cathay, in the citie of Lon don." I 66 In one of his marginal notes (fol. 268) he gives us Cabot's statement to him, that the icebergs were of fresh, and not of salt water ; and again in the marginal note (fol. 255), we have what Cabot said as to the quantity of grain raised by him in the La Plata, corrected afterwards at fol. 317* Speaking of the voyage to the North-East projected by Cabot, in which Richard Chancellor, as pilot major, accompanied Sir Hugh Willoughby, and succeeded, after the death of his gallant but unfortunate commander, in opening the trade to Russia, Eden says (fol. 256), "And whereas I have before made mention ho we Moscovia was in our time discovered by Richard Chan cellor, in his viage toward Cathay, by the direction and in formation of the sayde master Sebastian, who longe before had this secreate in his mynde, I shall not neede here, &c." The account of Cabot's escape from the waterspout (fol. 357) has been already adverted to. We may note here, that Forster, in his " Voyage and Dis coveries in the North" (p. 269), gravely considers, and almost sanctions, a doubt of the French writer Bergeron whether the Sebastian Cabot so conspicuous in the reign of Edward VI. could have been the same who discovered the continent of America. It may serve to show the very slight prepara tion with which many works of reputation on these subjects have been got up, that in the course of the argument no re ference is made to Eden, who conveys from the lips of the "good owlde man" himself, interesting particulars of his earlier voyages! So, also, in a more recent work,* the fol lowing expressions are found (p. 361), " We must now return to the period of the first attempt to find out a North-East passage to India. A society of merchants had been formed in London for this purpose. Sebastian Cabot, either the son or the grandson of John Cabot, and who held the situation of grand pilot of England, under Edward VI., was chosen governor of this society!" * Historical Sketch of the Progress of Discovery, Navigation, and Commerce from the earliest records to the beginning of the nineteenth century. By William Stevenson, Esq., forming vol. xviii. of Kerr's Collection of Voyages, &c. 67 Another of Eden's personal friends seems to have been Richard Chancellor. At fol. 284, we find that celebrated mariner giving an account of the ingenuity of the Russians in the construction of their buildings ; and at fol. 298, a further account of that people. He tells Eden (ib.) of an ambassador whom he saw therefrom the " province of Sibier," who gave him some curious information about the " Great Chan." He met also with the Ambassador of the Kinge of Persia, called the Great Sophie," who was not only civil, but very useful to him. But it is time to turn to the more immediate object of this chapter the birth-place of Cabot. In order to comprehend the full value of the information supplied by Eden, it may be well to show, in the first place, how the matter has been treated by others. a Sebastian Cabote is, by many of our writers, affirmed to be an Englishman, born at Bristol, but the Italians as posi tively claim him for their countryman, and say he was born at Venice, which, to speak impartially, I believe to be the truth, for he says himself, that when his father was invited over to England, he brought him with him, though he was then very young" (Harris's Collection of Voyages, vol. ii. p. 191). These expressions are copied, verbatim, by Pinker- ton (Collection of Voyages and Travels, vol. xii. p. 160). In the history of Navigation, prefixed to Churchill's Collec tion of Voyages (vol. i. p. 39), said to have been drawn up by Locke, and found in his works (vol. x. Lond. ed. of 1823, p. 428), reference is made to Sebastian Cabot, a Venetian, but residing in England." Purchas says of him (vol. iii. Pil grims, p. 901), He was an Englishman by breeding, borne a Venetian, but spending most part of his life in England, and English employments." Even when he states (vol. iii. p. 807), that on the " Effigies" of Sebastian Cabot hung up in the Royal Gallery, that personage is called an Englishman, he adds " for his English breeding, condition, affection and advancement, termed an Englishman," and referring, on ano- 68 ther occasion to the same document, says, " He was born at Venice, and serving Henry VII., Henry VIII., and Edward VI., was accounted English. Galpano says, he was born at Bristol." By Galpano, he means the Portuguese writer Gal- vano, or Galvam, in whose work, translated by Hakluyt, that statement is made (p. 66), as it is also by Hcrrera (Dee. i lib, ix. cap. 13), whom Purchas. himself quotes (vol. iv, p. 177 to that point. In defiance of the contemporary "Effigies," and of these foreign authorities, most modern writers, Hume, Forster, Charlevoid, &c. have been led astray. The Quarterly Review (vol. xvi. p. 154, note} informs us that Henry VII. engaged " the Cabots of Venice in the discovery of Newfoundland;" and Mr Barrow, in his " Chronological History of Voyages, &c." (p. 36 7), speaks of the credit due to England, for having "so wisely and honourably enrolled this deserving foreigner in the list of her citizens." Now it will scarcely be credited, that we have in Eden, a positive statement on the subject, from the lips of Sebastian Cabot himself. The following marginal note will be found at fol. 255 " SEBASTIAN CABOTE TOULD ME that he was borne in Brystowe, and that at iiii. yeare ould he was carried with his father to Venice, and so returned agayne into Eng land with his father after certayne years, whereby he was thought to have been born in Venice." Thus, then, was the question conclusively settled 275 years ago ! It is needless to- repeat what has been already said, in another place, as to the slight credit due to the report of the conversation relied on by Harris, Pinkerton, and the rest, for there is, in fact, no discrepance to be reconciled. Cabot there states the circum stances which more immediately preceded the commission from Henry VII. ; and the occasion did not lead to any detail of his own earlier history. Should Sir Edward Parry be recalled to embark on a new voyage of discovery, he might very naturally advert, hereafter, to the period of his return, and would scarcely deem it necessary to add that he had been 69 in the country before. For the future, then, it is to be hoped that no perverse efforts will be made to obscure the claim of England to this Great Seaman. He owed to her his birth, and the language and associations of childhood. He returned thither while yet a boy (" pene infam" is the expression of Peter Martyr), and grew up there to manhood, when he was commissioned to go in quest of new regions, wherein he "set up the banner" of England. Under this banner, he was the first European who reached the shores of the American Con tinent. He ended, as he had begun, his career in the service af his native country, infusing into her Marine a spirit of lofty enterprise a high moral tone a system of mild, but inflexible discipline, of which the results were, not long after, so con spicuously displayed. Finally, he is seen to open new sources of commerce, of which the influence may be distinctly traced on her present greatness and prosperity. Surely it is as absurd as it is unnatural, to deny to such a man the claim which he seems to have anxiously preferred, and which has been placed on record under his direct sanction. 70 CHAP. IX. THE PATENTS OF 5TH MARCH, 1496, AKD 3RD FEBRUARY, 1498. BEFORE proceeding to a close examination of the documents which establish the real history of these voyages, it may be well to advert to the reckless manner in which facts have been made to yield to any hypothesis which a short-sighted view has suggested as indispensable. The following passage is found in Harris' Voyages (ed. of 1744 8, vot. ii. p. 190), and in Pinkerton's Collection (vol. xii. p. 158). "But the year before that patent was granted, viz. in 1494, John Cabot, with his son Sebastian, had sailed from Bristol upon discovery, and had actually seen the Continent ef Newfoundland, to which they gave the name otPrima Vista, or first seen. And on the 24th June, in the same year, he went ashore on an Island which, because it was discovered on that day, he called St John's.,- and of this Island he reported, very truly, that the soil was barren, that it yielded little, and that the people wear bearskin clothes, and were armed with bows, arrows^ pikes, darts, wooden clubs, and slings ; but that the coast abounded with fish, and upon this report of his, the before-mentioned patent {of 5th March 1495) was granted." Mr Barrow also says (p. 32), ' There is no possible way of reconciling the various accounts collected by Hakluyt, and which amount to no less a number than six, but by supposing John Cabot to have made one voyage, at least, previous to the date of the patent, and some time between that and the date of the return of Columbus, either in 1494 or 1495." It must by this time be apparent, that the hypothesis thus started, is not only uncalled for, but would contradict every authentic account which has come down to us. It is altogether irreconcilable with that very document which stands foremost of the " six," on the pages of Hakluyt the extract from the map cut by Clement Adams, and hung up in the Privy Gallery for it is there declared expressly, 71 that at five o'clock in the morning, of the 24th June, 1497, was discovered that land, which no man before that time had attempted to approach (" quatn nullus prius adire ausus fuit"). What possible motive can be imagined, on the part of Cabot, for disguising the fact of a discovery made so long before? The supposition is as absurd, as it is gratuitous. How, again, does it agree with the statement of Sebastian Cabot, that on the voyage made under the royal authority, he was surprised by the sight of land, "not thinking to find any other land than that of Cathay ?" This is one of the "six" accounts which it is proposed to reconcile by assuming a dis covery of the same region three years before ! The first patent bears date the 5th March, in the eleventh year of the reign of Henry VII. It is found in Rymer (Fcedera, vol. xii.'p. 595), who correctly refers it to 5th March, 1496, the computation of this monarch's reign being from August, 1485. Hakluyt states it to be of 1495 (vol. iii. p. 5), looking, as we may infer, not to the Historical, but to the Legal or Civil year, which commenced, prior to 1752, on the 25th March. The patent is in favour of John Cabot and his three sons, Lewis, Sebastian, and Sancius ; and authorises them, their heirs, or deputies, to " sail to all parts, countries, and seas of the East, of the West, and of the North, under our banners and ensigns, with five ships of what burthen or quantity soever they be, and as many mariners or men as they will have with them in the said ships, upon their own proper costs and charges, to seek out, discover, and find whatsoever isles, countries, regions, or provinces of the heathen and infidels, whatsoever they be, and in what part of the world soever they be, which before this time have been unknown to all Chris tians." It is plain, that a previous discovery, so far from being assigned as the ground for the patent, as Harris, Pink- erton, &c. assert, is negatived by its very terms. The patent would be inapplicable to any region previously visited .by either of the Cabots, and confer no right. Assuming, what is obvi- 72 ously absurd, that the discovery could have been made without becoming at once universally known, yet the patentees must have been aware that they exposed themselves, at any moment when the fact should come out, to have the grant vacated on the ground of a deceptive concealment. The patentees are authorised to set up the Royal banner, "in every village, town, castle, isle, or main land, by them newly found, " and to subdue, occupy, and possess all such regions, and to exercise jurisdiction over them in the name of the King of England. One-fifth of the clear profit of the enterprise is reserved to the King, and it is stipulated that the vessels shall return to the port of Bristol. The privilege of exclusive resort and traffic is secured to the patentees. The Second Patent is dated the third of February, in the thirteenth year of the reign of Henry VII.,. corresponding with third February 1498. The only evidence heretofore published on the subject, is contained in a brief memorandum found in Hakluyt (vol. iii. p. 6), who, we> are persuaded, never saw the original. The person, also, who gave him the information of its existence, probably did not go beyond a list of the titles of instruments of that description kept for con venient reference. The memorandum of Hakluyt is as fol lows : "The King, upon the third day of February, in the thir teenth year of his reign, gave license to John Caboto to take six English ships in any haven or havens of the realm of Eng land, being of the burden of two hundred tons or under, with all necessary furniture, and to take also into the said ships, all such masters, mariners and subjects of the King as willingly would go with him," &c. Such being the whole of the information supplied, it is no wonder, that the most erroneous conjectures have been started. Dr Robertson (History of America, book ix.) adopts the dates of Hakluyt. "This Commission (the first) was granted on March 5th, 1495, in less than two years after the return of Columbus from America. But Cabot (for that is the name he assumed in England, and by which he is best known) did not 73 set out on his voyage for two years." Dr Robertson makes no express reference to the second commission, and having fol lowed Hakluyt in referring that of the eleventh Henry VII. to 1495, he doubtless regarded the order of the thirteenth year of Henry VII. as merely a final permission for the de parture of the expedition, made out in 1497 on the eve of its sailing. In " The Naval History of England in all its Branches," by Lediard, it is said (p. 85) after giving the first patent " Hakluyt, from whom I have taken this commission, places in the margin, A.D. 1495. But, according to Rymer's Fcade- ra, it was dated March 5, 1496. To the ship granted by the king, of which, however, this commission makes no mention, some merchants of London added three more, laden with such slight commodities as were thought proper for commerce with barbarous people. By an extract from a record of the rolls, it appears, that though Cabot's commission was signed in March, 1495, or 1496, he did not go to sea on this expedi tion till the beginning of the year 1497. This record is in the following words." He then gives Hakluyt's notice of the patent of February 3, 1498. The same notion that the second patent preceded discovery has found its way across the Atlantic, but with an observance of the historical computation as to dates. Thus, in the valua ble Introduction to Marshall's Life of Washington, the first patent is correctly referred to March 5, 1496; and it is said, " The Expedition contemplated at the date of the commission appears not then to have been made, but in May (1498) Ca bot, with his second son," &c. Forster (p. 266) says, "In the 13th year of this king's reign, John Cabot obtained permission to sail with six ships of. 200 tons burthen and under, on new discoveries. He did not sail, however, till the beginning of May, 1497 (!) and then, by his own account, had but two ships fitted out and stocked with provisions at the king's expense, &c." In Harris's Voyages, &c. (Ed. of 17448, vol. ii. p. 190), K 74 and in Pinkerton (vol. xii. p. 158), after stating, not conjee turally, but as an unquestionable fact, that the first voyage was in 1494, it is added, "The next voyage made for discovery was by Sebastian Cabot, the son of John, concerning which all our writers have fallen into great mistakes, for want of com paring the several accounts we have of this voyage, and making proper allow ances for the manner in which they were written ; since I cannot find there was ever any distinct and clear account of this voyage published, though it was of so great consequence. On the contrary, I believe that Cabot himself kept no jour nal of it by him ; since, in a letter he wrote on this subject, he speaks doubtfully of tiie very year in which it was undertaken, though, from the circumstances he relates, that may be very certainly fixed. On the 3d of February, in the 13th year of the reign of King Henry VII, a new graut was made to John Cabot, by which he had leave given him to take ships out of any of the Ports of England, of the burthen of 200 tons, to sail upon discoveries ; but before this could be effected, John Cabot died, and Sebastian, his son, applied himself to the king, proposing to discover a North-West Passage, as he himself tells us ; and for this purpose, he had a ship manned and victualled at the king's expense, at Bristol, and three or four other ships were fitted out, at the expense of some merchants of that city, particularly Mi- Thorne, and Mr Hugh Elliot. But whereas Sebastian Cabot himself says that he made this voyage in the summer of 1496, he must he mistaken ; and he very well might, speaking from his memory only : and to prove this, I need only observe, that this date will not at all agree, even with his own account of the voyage ; for he says expressly, it was undertaken after his father's death, who, as we have shown, was alive in the February following ; so that it was the summer of the year 1497 in which jie made this voyage, and what he after- wards relates of his return proves this likewise." It is scarcely necessary to remark, that aside from all other considerations, the whole of their statement is in direct colli sion with the fact, that the discovery of the 24th June, 1497, is referred, on evidence which these writers do not undertake to question, to the joint agency of father and son. That, therefore, which should decisively control speculation, is blindly sacrificed to an effort to get over some minor difficul ties which, in reality, have their origin only in the kindred misconceptions of preceding compilers. All this obscurity will now disappear. After a tedious search there has been found, at the Rolls Chapel, the original patent of 3d February, 1498. The following is an exact copy: " Memorandum quod tertio die Februarii ango regni Regis Henrici Septimi xni. 75 ista Billa delibata fuit Domino Cancellario Angliae apud Westmonasterium exc- quenda. " To the Kinge. ' Please it your Highnesse of your most noble and habundaunt grace to graunte to John Kabotto, Venecian, your gracious Lettres Patents in due fourme to be made accordyng to the tenor hereafter ensuyng, and he shall continually praye to God for the preservacion of your moste Noble and Roiall astate longe to endure. H. R. "Rex. " To all men to whom theis Presenteis shall come send Gretyng: Knowe ye that We of our Grace especiall, and for dyyers causis us movying, We Have geven and graunten, and by theis Presentis geve and graunte to our welbelored John Kabotto, Venecian, sufficiente auctorite and power, that he, by him his Deputie or Deputies sufficient, may take at his pleasure VI Englisshe Shippes in any Porte or Portes or other place within this our Realme of England or obeisance, so that and if the said Shippes be of the bourdeyn of CC. tonnes or under, with their apparail requisite and neces- sarie for the safe conduct of the said Shippes, and them convey and kde to the Londe and Isles of latefounde ~by the seid John in oure name and by our commaundemente. Paying for theym and every of theym as and if we should in or for our owen cause paye and noon otherwise. And that the said John, by hym his Deputie or Deputies sufficiente, maye take and re- ceyve into the said Shippes, and every of theym all such maisters, mary- ners, Pages, and other subjects as of their owen free wille woll goo and passe with him in the same Shippes to the seid Londe or fles, withoute anye impedymente, lett or perturbance of any of our officers or imnistres or sub jects whatsoever they be by theym to the seyd John, his Deputie, or Depu ties, and all other our seid subjects or any of theym passinge with the seyd John in the said Shippes to the seid Londe or lies to be doon, or suffer to be doon of attempted. Geving in commaundement to all and every our officers, ministres and subjects seyingor herying thies our Lettres Patents, without any ferther commaundement by Us to theym or any of theym to be geven to perfourme and socour the said John, his Deputie and all our said Subjects so passyng with hym according to the tenor of theis our Lettrei Patentis. Any Statute, Acte, or Ordennance to the contrarye made or to be made in any wise notwithstanding." Surely the importance of this document cannot be exagge rated. It establishes conclusively, and for ever, that the American continent was first discovered by an expedition commissioned to " set up the banner" of England. It were 76 idle to offer an argument to connect this recital of 3d Feb ruary, 1498, with the discovery of the 24th June, 1497, noted on the old map hung up at Whitehall. Will it not be deemed almost incredible that the very Document in the Records of England, which recites the great discovery, and plainly con templates a scheme of colonization, should, up to this moment, have been treated by her own writers as the one which first gave the permission to go forth and explore ? Nay, this very instrument has been used as an argument against the pretensions of England ; for it has been asked by foreigners who have made the computation, and seen through the mistake of Pinkerton and the rest, why the patent of 3d February, 1498, took no notice of discoveries pretended to have been made the year before. The question is now tri umphantly answered. The importance of negativing a notion that the English discoveries were subsequent to the patent of the 13th Henry VII., will strikingly appear, on reference to the claim of Jlmericus Fespucius. The truth, as now established, places beyond all question even crediting the doubtful assertions of Vespucius the priority of Cabot's discovery over that of the lucky Florentine. The map in Queen Elizabeth's gallery made no false boast in declaring that on the 24th June 1497, the English expedition discovered that land " quam nullus prius adire ausus fuit."* * The manner in which the precious Document referred to, and others of a similar kind, are kept, cannot be adverted to without an expression of regret. They are thrown loosely together, without reference even to the appropriate year, and are unnoticed in any Index or Calendar. It required a search of more than two weeks to find this patent of 3d February 1498, although the. year and day of its date were furnished at the outset. Another document which appears in the present volume the patent of Henry VII. to three Portuguese and others, dated 19 March, 1501, authorising them to follow up the discoveries of Cabot has never before been published. This also was discovered, after a long search, not even folded up, but lying with one-half of the written part exposed, and, in conse quence, so soiled and discoloured that it was with the greatest difficulty it could be deciphered, and some words finally eluded the most anxious scrutiny. And 77 this of two documents indispensable to the history of Maritime Discovery, and for the want of which, the account of these voyages has been completely unintelli gible ! An extraordinary compensation is claimed at the Rolls Chapel on account of the trouble attending a search amidst such a confused mass. For finding the documents, two guineas were demanded in addition to the cost of copies. The applicant is informed, that the charge must be paid, whether the document be dis covered or not; so that the officer .has no motive to continue perseveringly the irksome pursuit. 78 CHAP. X. THE SOUTHWARD SUBSEQUENT VOYAGE OF 1498. THE name of the vessel which first touched the shores of the American continent is not without interest The Matthew, of Bristol, had that proud distinction. A respectable writer* furnishes the following passage from an ancient Bristol manu script in his possession : " In the year 1497, the 24th June, on St John's day, was Newfoundland found by Bristol men, in a ship called The Matthew." The question how far Cabot, on quitting the north, proceed ed along the coast of the Continent, has been the subject of contradictory statements. By some his progress is limited to a latitude corresponding with that of the straits of Gibraltar, while others insist on carrying him to the extreme point of the Atlantic sea coast. We can hardly be at a loss to decide, when it is recollected that while there is no direct authority for the latter opinion, and it is one which would readily be adopted, in mistake, from the vague use, originally, of the title Florida, the former has the direct sanction of Peter Martyr (Dec. iii. cap. vi.). "Tetenditque tantum ad merediem, littore sese incurvante, ut Herculei freti latitudinis/ere gradus equarit ; ad occidentemque profectus tantum estut Cubam Insulam a laeva longitudine graduum pene parem habuerit." " He was thereby brought so far into the South, by reason of the land bending so much to the south- * "The History and Antiquities of the, City of Bristol, compiled from original Records and authentic Manuscripts in public offices or private hands. By William Barrett Bristol, 1789," p. 172. The same fact is stated in The History of Bris tol by John Corry and the Rev. John Evans, vol. i. p. 213. (In King's Library, title in Catalogue Corry.) 79 ward, that it was there almost equal in latitude with the sea Fretum Herculeum having 1 the North Pole elevate in a manner in the same degree. He sailed likewise in this tract so far towards the West, that he had the Island of Cuba on his left band in manner, in the same degree of longitude." (Hakluyt, vol. iii. p. 9.) Gomara, more definitely but perhaps only determining by conjecture the circumstantial statement of Peter Martyr, names, as has been seen, 38. Hakluyt, in the dedication of his second volume to Sir Robert Cecil, boasts of the universal acknowledgement, even by foreigners, "that all that mighty tract of land, from 67 degrees northward, to the latitude almost of Florida, was first discovered out of England, by the com mandment of King Henry VII. ;" and again, in a marginal note of his third volume (p. 9), he states that Cabot dis covered " the northern parts of that land, and from thence as far almost as Florida." Peter Martyr informs us that a failure of provisions at this point compelled an abandonment of the further pursuit of the coast, and a return to England. It has been preferred to settle the question before quitting the first voyage, because the progress to the southward may have taken place on that occasion, as a discovery of both "Londe and Isles" is recited in the second patent. Should a further development of the subject lead to an opinion that this incident, mentioned first by Peter Martyr, belongs to another voyage which that writer more probably had in view, there will be no difficulty in adjusting it hereafter to its proper place. * * One piece of evidence has lately been brought to light from which it may be inferred that Cabot returned to England immediately after the discovery of the 24th June, 1497. In the account of the Privy Purse Expenses of Henry VII., is the following entry : " 10th August, 1407. To hym that found the New Isle, 107." The document referred to, which forms one of the Additional MSS. in the British Museum, is in the hand-writing of Craven Orde, Esq., formerly one of the Secondaries of the office of the King's Remembrancer of the Court of Exchequer, and has recently been given to the public by Hams Nicolas, Esq., in his valuable Excerpta Historica. Mr N. remarks, "The originals, doubtless, form part of the muniments of the King's Remembrancer's Office, and though the great exertions which have been made to collate these extracts with them received every assistance from the King's Remembrancer and the other officers, they failed, because these 80 The interesting inquiry now arises as to subsequent voyages, made after the death of John Cabot which is supposed to have taken place -shortly after the date of the second patent of 3rd February, 1498. It cannot he supposed, for a moment, that Sebastian Cabot would lightly abandon what had been so hardly won. He was named in the original patent; and a right under the discovery vested in him, aside from his claim as the son of John Cabot A large sum had been expended on the first voyage, and was now represented solely by the title to the newly discovered region. He must have been strangely insensible to his in terests, as well as suddenly deficient in enterprise, to turn away, without further effort, from a pursuit which had thus far been crowned with the most flattering success. The first item of evidence on the subject, is that supplied by Stow. Under the year 1498, and in the Mayoralty of William Purchas, there occurs, in the Annals, the following statement : " This yeere, one Sebastian Gaboto, a Genoas sonne, borne in Bristow, professing himselfe to be expert in knowledge of the circuit of the world and islands of the same, as by his charts and other reasonable demonstrations he shewed, caused the King to man, ami victuall a ship at Bristow to search for an island, which he knew to be replenished with rich commodities : in the ship divers merchants of London adventured small stocks, and in the company of this ship, sailed also out of Bristow, three or foure small shippes fraught with sleight and grosse wares, as coarse cloth, caps, laces, points, and such other." It has already been proved, in another place, that this was the statement made by Stow to Hakluyt, and that the substi- MSS. are presumed to be in some of the numerous bags that are lying unarranged in Westminster Hall, an examination of which could only be effected at a sacrifice of time and expense, which no private individual can incur." Since the publica tion, it has been ascertained that a portion of what is supposed to be the original is in the possession of Sir Thomas Phillips, having been purchased by him at a sale of the effects of Mr Orde. Unfortunately, it does not go further back than the year. 1502. 81 tution, by the lattery of the name of John Cabot took place afterwards, at two successive stages of alteration. The fact clearly appeared, by a reference to Hakluyt's earlier volume of 1582, and by the name of Sebastian Cabot, which yet lingers incautiously in the enlarged work at the head of Stow's communication, even after a change in the body of it. We have then before us, here, the honest result of S tow's re searches .* There can be no mistake as to the period to which he would refer this incident; for the mayoralty of Purchas, is mentioned in the communication to Hakluyt (vol. iii. p. 9). When, too, under the year 1502, he speaks of the exhibition of sav ages, reference is made to what he had before stated as oc curring in the time of that Mayor. Speed (747) so under stands him and Purchas (Pilgrims, vol. iii. p. 808). It appears, by the list of these functionaries found in the various Chroniclers, that the mayoralty of Purchas extended from 28 October, 1497 to 28 October, 1498. Unless then we suppose a mistake to have been committed, the voyage alluded to was subsequent ta that of the original discovery. A matter so simple as this has not escaped mis-statement. Thus, in MTherson'^ Annals of Commerce (vol. ii. p. 13, note), it is said, ".We may depend on the contemporary testimony of Alderman Fabyan, who says that he sailed in the beginning of May in the mayoralty of John Tate, that is 1497, but returned in the subsequent mayoralty of William Purchas." Here is as much error as could be condensed into one sentence. Fabyan does not place the expedition in the mayoralty of Tate, but in that of Purchas, and we are told, that no tidings were heard of the expedition during that Mayor's time, viz. as late as October, 1498. It is, indeed, a singular fact that writers who on most topics are dull, com mon-place, and safe who might be trusted, one would think, in poetry itself, without peril to their matter-of-fact character instantly become imaginative on touching any part of Ca bot's history. L 82 In connexion with the statement of Stow, it may be men tioned that both Peter Martyr and the person, said to be Galeatius Butrigarius, who held the conversation with Cabot, at Seville, speak of a voyage from England subsequent to the father's death. Peter Martyr, in the passage usually cited on the subject, says nothing of dates, but writing afterwards in 1524, (Decade vii. cap. ii.) he refers to Cabot's voyage, as having taken place "twenty-six years since/' that is, in 1498. To these statements, another is to be added, though it in creases, perhaps, rather the number than the weight of authorities. The first article in the third volume of Ramusio is a Sum mary of The Spanish Discoveries in the New World, drawn professedly from Peter Martyr, and entitled " Sommario della Historia delF Indie Occidental! cavato dalli libri scritti dal Sig. Don Pietro Martire." It was first published an onymously, at Venice, in a separate form, in the year 1543,* and is quite unworthy of the place which it now occupies. The arrangement of Peter Martyr is entirely disregarded, and no reference is given to the original, by which any of the statements may be verified or disproved. Under the pretended sanction, too, of Peter Martyr, the writer has in- roduced many unfounded, and even absurd, assertions of his own. Thus the statement given in the original of the manner in which the bears catch fish, and which is confirmed by late accounts,! this writer has spun outj into a minute and ridicu lous description. It is here stated that Cabot reached only 55, an assertion which the Biographic Universelle (art. Cabot) copies and cites as from Peter Martyr, when there is nothing of the kind in the original. In repeating the expression of Peter Martyr, about the death of the father, this writer says "after whose death, finding himself very rich and of great ambition, Haym's "Bibliotheca Italiana o sia notizia de Libro ran Italian!," p. 131. t See Cartwright's Labrador. t Ramusio, torn. Hi. fol. 35, in Index "Bacalai," " Sebastiano Gabotto," and " orso." 83 he resolved," &c. ("dapoila morte del quale trovandosi richissimo et di grande animo deliberosi,"&e.). But, without laying any stress on such a statement, there is sufficient with out it to supply an important auxiliary argument to that de rived from the chroniclers.* One circumstance is to be particularly noted. The second patent does not look to further discoveries, but merely au thorises the patentee to revisit theJRegion already^ found, and to take thither such of the king's subjects as might be inclined to accompany him or his deputies. According to Stow, the " Genoa's son" effected his object with the king, by a representation as to an Island " which he knew to be replenished with rich commodities," or as it is expressed in Hakluyt, " which he said he knew well was rich and replenished with great commodities." Thus the lan guage of the patent and of the chronicles is in consonance as to the purpose of the voyage of 1498. It no longer had reference, exclusively, to the search for a North-West Passage. The place of destination was some known definite point, which was supposed to offer an advantageous opening for traffic. The argument to be fairly drawn from this coincidence is placed in a very striking point of view, by referring to writers who approached the statement of the chronicles under the misconception that the reference was to the original expedi tion of 1497. Campbell, in The Lives of the Admirals * It is obvious that the Will of John Cabot might throw much light on this subject. If, as is probable, he died at Bristol, it would be proved at Worcester. On application at the Bishop's Registry, the acting Registrar, Mr Clifton, writes thus : " The indices of Wills proved, and letters of administration granted do not extend farther back than the year 1600. Previous to this period, these doc- uments are tied up in linen bags without much form or order; so that a search for the Will of John Cabot, or Gabot, or Kabot would be attended with very considerable. trouble and expense, whilst the chance of discovering it would be uncertain." Aside from Historical purposes, it would be curious to see an -instrument, dated some months before the time when Columbus (in August, 1498) first saw the Continent of America, which, probably, makes a disposition of the testator's interest in the tract of land lying between the present Hudson's Strait and Florida. 84 (article, Sir John Cabot), adopts Hakluyt's substitution of John Cabot's name, and thus speaks of the patent of 3rd Feb* ruary, 1498. "In consequence of this license, the King at his own expense caused a ship to be Equipped at Bristol : to this the merchants of that city, and of London, added three or four small vessels, freighted with proper commodities, which fleet sailed in the spring of the year 1497- Our old Chronicle writers, particularly Fabian, tell us of a very rich island which John Cabot promised to discover ; but in this they seem to mistake the matter for want of thoroughly understanding the subject of which they were writing. John Cabot was too a wise man to pretend to know r before he saw it, what country he should discover, whether island or continent ; but what he proposed was to find a North-West passage to the Indies." How does this patent of 3rd February 1498 scatter light around in every direction ! After slumbering at the Rolls for upwards of three centuries, it reappears to vindicate, tri umphantly, the fair fame of its venerable contemporaries thus flippantly assailed ! The same difficulty in reconciling the language of the ancient chronicles with the supposed allusion to the voyage of 1497, has led Harris* (ed. of 1744 8, vol. ii. p. 190) and Pinkerton (vol. xii. p. 158) to the positive assertion that John Cabot made a voyage as early as 1494, and that " upon this report of his/' the first patent was granted. Mr Barrow also (p. 32) is. from the same cause, driven to the assertion that it is im possible to understand the various accounts "but by supposing John Cabot to have made one voyage at least previous to the date of the patent." It has been before shown, that such a supposition is not only inconsistent with every authentic state ment, but at variance with the terms of the first pa tent itself. We now see that it is as unnecessary as it is unwarranted. The plain distinction between the two voyages clears up It is but just to remark, that though the volume here referred to bears the name of Harris, and is so copied and cited by Pinkerton, yet the passages in question make no part of the original work. Daines Barrington, Esq. in his " Possibility of approaching the North Pole," &c. (ed. of 1818, p. 15), states, that; the supplemental matter was furnished by Dr Camjsbell. No method is used to distinguish the original from what is interpolated ; ai\d Pinkerton was, probably, thus misled. 85 an incidental difficulty. Many writers have been perplexed by finding that while some accounts speak of the enterprise as wholly at the expense of the Cabots, others represent the King to have had an interest in it. The reason is now obvious. The first vague exploratory voyage was at the expense of the individuals, to verify the Speculations of Sebastian Cabot. The patent of 5th March, 1496, says expressly, that the en terprise is to be " at their own proper cost and charge." But when a specific discovery had been made, and the atten tion of the capitalists of London was drawn to the subject, the wary king himself yielded to the sanguine representations of the discoverers, and became a partner in the concern. This fact is very clearly established by the following entries in the Account of his Privy-Purse Expenses : " 22d March, 1498. To Lanslot Tkirkill, of London, upon a prest,* for his shippe going towards the New Ilande, 20/." " Delivered to Launcelot Thirkill, going towards the New Isle, in prest, 20/. J> " April 1, 1498. To Thomas Bradley, and Lancelot Thirkill, going to the New- Isle, SO/." "To John Carter, going to the Newe Isle, in rewarde, 2/." At this point the subject attracted, the attention of a Chron icler living in London. It is not unnatural that he should suppose the region discovered to be an island, and that the same expression should be used by the Keeper of the Privy Purse, and others, whose minds had not then embraced the idea of a new Continent. The Chronicler speaks of documents submitted to the inspection of the king, and of the nature of which he evidently knew only by vague report. The King himself, however, who had listened to the statements of u the Genoas son," and saw his map, who heard of the mighty rivers which were found issuing into the sea, knew from these " charts and other reasonable demonstrations," that here must be something more th'an an island, and we find, accordingly, in the patent of 3rd February, 1498, reference made to " the Londe and Isles" discovered. * In the way of loan or advance. 86 To doubt, then, that a voyage took place in 1498, under Sebastian Cabot, violates every probability, is against strong collateral testimony, and rejects contemptuously the direct and positive averment of the ancient Chroniclers, at the very moment when we warm with indignation at the attempt of a shallow and presumptuous ignorance to depreciate them. What was the result of the voyage ? This is a question of more difficulty. Peter Martyr and Gomara mention, as has been seen, that Sebastian Cabot had with him three hundred men. It is diffi cult to believe that such a number could have been taken in reference to a mere commercial enterprise, and absurd to con nect them with the first exploratory voyage. The language, too, of the second patent seems to suggest that a settlement was intended, the royal permission to depart extending to " all such masters, mariners, pages and other subjects, as of their own free will, will go and pass with him in the same ships, to the said Londe or Isles." On a point so interesting as this, we may repeat here the language of Gomara. After mentioning that Sebastian Cabot was the first who brought intelligence of the Baccalaos, he proceeds : " El qual armo dos navios en Inglaterra do tratava desde pequeno a costa del Rey Enrique Septimo, quo desseava contratar en la especieria, como hazia el rey d* Portugal. Otros disen que a su costa. Y que prometio al rey Enrique de yr pop el norte al Catayo y traer de alia especias en menos tiempo que Portuguese, por el sun Y va tambien par saber que tierra 'eran las Indias para poblar. Llevo trezientos hombres y cammo la buelta de Isladia sobre cabo del Labrador. Y hasta se poner en cinquenta y ocho grados. Aunque el dize mucho mas contando como avia por el mes de Julio tato frio y pedacos de yelo que no oso passar mas adelante. Y que los dios eran grandissimos y quasi sin noche y las nbches muy claras. Es cierte que a sesenta grados son los dies de diez y ocho horas. Diedo pues Gaboto la frialdad, y estraneza dela tierra, dio la vuelta hazia poniente y reha- ziendo se en los Baccalaos como la costa hasta treienta y ochos grados y torno se de alii a Inglaterra." " Sebastian Cabot was the fyrst that browght any knowleage of this lande. For beinge in Englande in the dayes of Kyng Henry the Seventh, he furnysshed twoo shippes at his owne charges, or (as sum say) at the Kynges, whome he persuaded that a passage might be founde to Cathay by the North Seas, alid that spices might be brought from thense soner by that way, then by the yyage the Portugalcs vse by the sea of Sur. He went also to knowe what maner 87 of landes those Indies were to inhabite. He had with hym three hundreth men, and directed his course by the tracte of Islande vppon the cape of Labrador at Iviii. degrees: affirmynge that in the monethe of July there was such could and heapes of ise that he durst -passe ho further: also that the dayes were very longe and in maner without nyght, and the nyghtes very clear. Certayne it is, that the Ix. degrees, the longest day is of xviii. houres. But consyderynge the coulde and the straungeness of the unknowen lande, he turned his course from thense to the West, folowynge the coast of the lande of Baccalos vnto the xxxviii. degrees, from whense he returned to Englande." (Eden's Decades, fol. 318.) From these expressions it is plain that it was understood to have been part of the design to make the experiment of colo nization. Connected with this part of the subject is a curious pass age in an old work by The vet, the French Cosmographer. This writer is, deservedly, held in little estimation, his work being disfigured by the plainest marks of haste, as well as by the most absurd credulity. The only circumstance which could induce us to attach importance to his statement is, the allusion to conversations with Cartier, who, in 1534, visited the St Lawrence. Thevet not only refers to that navigator incidentally here, but in his subsequent larger work, enti tled Cosmographie Universelle, speaks of Cartier repeatedly, as his intimate friend, and mentions (Paris Ed. of 1575, torn, ii. fol. 1014) having spent five months with him at St Malo. The work now particularly alluded to is entitled " Singulari- tez de la France Antarctique," published at Paris, in 1558, in which, speaking of the Baccalaos, there occurs (ch. 74, fol. 148) the following passage: "Elle fut decouverte premierement par Sebastian Babate Anglois lequel per- suada au Roy d' Angleterre Henry Septiesme qu'il iroit aisement par la au pais de Catay vers le Nort et que par ce moyen trouveroit espiceries et autres choses aussi bien que le Roy de Portugal aux Indes, joint qu'il se proposoit aller au Peru et Amerique pour peupler le pais de nouveaus habitans et dresser la j une Nouvelle Angleterre, ce qu'il n' executa; vray est qu'il mist bien trots cens hommes en terre, du coste d'Irlande au Nort on lefroidfist mourir presque toutesa compagnie encore que ce fust au moys de Juillet. Depuis Jaques Quartier (ainsi que luy mesme m* a recite) fist deux fois le voyage en ce pays la, c'est a scavoir 1* an mil cinq cens trente cinq." "It was first discovered by Sebastian Babate, an Englishman, who persuaded Henry VII. King of England, that he could go easily this way by the North to 88 Cathay, and that he would thus obtain spices and other articles from the Indies equally as well as the King of Portugal, added to which he proposed to go to Peru and America to people the country with new inhabitants, and to establish there a New England which he did not accomplish; true it is he put three hundred men ashore from the coast of Ireland towards the North where the cold destroyed nearly the whole company, though it was then the month of July. Afterwards Jaques Cartier (as he himself has told me) made two voyages to that country in 1534 and 1535." The greater part of this is evidently a mere perversion of what appears in Gomara, changing the name of the commander to Babate, and Iceland to Ireland ; and that which follows may he a random addition suggested by the reference in Go- mara to one of the objects of Cabot's expedition, and to the reasons which compelled him to turn back. On the other hand, while it seems somewhat harsh to im pute to the author a reckless falsehood, it is possible that he may have derived his information from Cartier, who would be very likely to know of any such early attempt at settlement. The vet seems, evidently, to turn from the book, whose influ ence is discernible on the general cast of the paragraph, in order to make a statement of his own, and instead of the general language of Gomara, to substitute specific assertions. If, then, we can rely on what he says, it seems clear not only that Cabot proposed colonization, but that he actually put a body of men on shore with that view. It will be noted, on referring to the language of Gomara, in the original, that he represents Cabot when returning from his extreme northern point to have stopped at Baccalaos for refreshment ("y reha- ziendoseen los Baccalaos"), and afterwards to have proceeded South to 38. It mav be, then, that before the renewed search for a Passage, which would seem to have continued an object of pursuit, he left a party to examine the country; who, on his return, dispirited by the dreariness of the region and perhaps by mortality, insisted on being taken off. The statement of Thevet was held in reserve, that its loose and careless air might not seem to be imparted to that which has a fixed and authentic character. Up to a certain point 89 the sailing of the expedition of 1498, under Sebastian Ca bot, and its apparent objects we have the clearest evidence. The next step we may hesitate, perhaps from excessive cau tion, to take, lest the support proffered by Thevet be illu sive. As we are indebted to Peter Martyr and Gomara for the length of the run along the coast to the Southward, it proba bly now took place, their reference evidently being, through out, to the present voyage. It was on this occasion, doubt less, that three hundred men were taken out, so that the supposition is perhaps strengthened by noticing that Peter Martyr represents the expedition to have been arrested in the South by a failure of provisions. One incident is deceptively connected by Hakluyt with this voyage. Stow speaks of an exhibition of savages in the year 1502 ; but Hakluyt, who derived this fact from hi ni, has altered the date from the seventeenth to the fourteenth year of Henry VII. As he relies altogether on Stow's com munication, it might be sufficient to point to that Annalist's own statement. The incident belongs to a voyage by differ ent persons, on reaching which it will be shown, that in the original work of Hakluyt, of 1582, he correctly refers the exhibition to the seventeenth year, but afterwards changed the date, in order to accommodate it, in point of time, to the voyage of Cabot with which he erroneously connected it. 90 CHAP. XI. VOYAGE TO MARACAIBO IN 1499. As it is certain that Sebastian Cabot did not enter the service Spain until the 13th of September 1512, we are obliged to lopk anxiously round, in every direction, for information as to his employment during the intermediate period. It is imposs ible to believe that he could have passed in inactivity the period of life best adapted for enterprise and adventure, and to which he at the same time brought maturity of judgment and abundant experience. Yet the Records, so far as made public, furnish no evidence on the subject, for though commiss ions were granted, as we shall have occasion hereafter to show, by Henry VII., in 1501 and 1502, to Portuguese adventurers, with a view to discovery, yet the name of Cabot is sought for in vain. Amidst this darkness of the horizon, there gleams up happily, in one quarter, a light which enables us to recognise objects with surprising clearness. A valuable work has recently been published by the Rev. Mr Seyer, entitled, " Memoirs Historical and Topographical of Bristol and its Neighbourhood, from the earliest period down to the present time." At p. 208, of vol. ii., it is stated that some of the ancient Calendars of Bristol, under the year 1499, have the following entry : This yeare, Sebastian Cabot borne in Bristoll, proffered his service to King Henry for discovering new countries ; which had noe greate or favorable entertainment of the king, but he with no extraordinary preparation sett forth from Bris toll, and made greate discoveries." 91 We might be inclined, perhaps, to attach no great impor tance to this statement and to view it as referring, with a mistake of date, to one of the Northern voyages, but that late disclosures absolutely compel us to seek some such clue to facts, which, without its aid, are altogether inexplicable. In the recent work of Don Martin Navarette, who has spread out the treasures of the Spanish Archives, he remarks (torn. iii. p. 41 ), " Lo cierto es que Hojeda en su primer viage hallo a ciertas Ingleses por las immediaciones de Caquibacoa" '* what is certain is, that Hojeda in his first voyage, found certain Englishmen in the neighbourhood of Caquibacoa"). These expressions occur in that part of the work where the author adverts to the commissions which the English Records show to have been granted by Henry VII., and to his inability to refer to any other quarter the remarkable fact of the meeting. Such a connexion, however, is deceptive, because the earliest of these commissions bears date the 19th March 1501. Hojeda sailed from Spain on the 20th of May 1499 (Na varette, torn. iii. p. 4), and was only one year absent. The mere fact that Cabot is known not to have entered a foreign service until long after this period, would suffice to satisfy us that he was the only man who could have been the leader of such an enterprise from England, particularly as we find that when, two years afterwards, an expedition was pro jected, three Portuguese were called in and placed at its head. The Bristol manuscript seems to put the matter beyond doubt. The expressions, also, there employed imply a slight of the subject on the part of the King, and probably embody a complaint uttered at the time. The voyage of 1498 had not, we may suspect, proved so productive as was anticipated, and the interest felt the year before now languished. Some complaint of this kind is discoverable in the conversation of Cabot at Seville, reported by Ramusio, though the neglect is certainly referred, in that report, to an erroneous period. When we remember that Cabot, the year before, was stop- 92 ped by the failure of provisions while proceeding Southward, he might naturally be expected to resume his progress along the coast on the first occasion, and he would thus be conduct ed to the spot where Hojeda found him. It is probable, therefore, that impatient of inactivity, and despairing of aid from the Crown, he threw himself into such a vessel as his private means enabled him to equip, and, as the Bristol man uscript expresses it, "with no extraordinary preparation set forth from Bristol and made great discoveries." It may have been while he followed the bent of his genius in this desultory manner, that the spirit of enterprise awaken ed again in England, and his absence may account for the non-appearance of his name in the subsequent patents. A less agreeable conjecture is suggested by the character of Henry VII. That shrewd and penurious monarch may have been influenced by the same feeling which induced Ferdinand of Spain to rid himself of Columbus, whose high estimate of what he had effected was found to mingle, incon veniently, with all his proposals for following up the Great Discovery. Henry may have preferred to listen to those with whom a bargain might be made solely in reference to prospective services. Avarice, a disease to which he was constitutionally subject and of which the symptoms became every year more apparent, had now reached his moral sense. Bacon, who wrote his History under the eye of James, a lineal descendant and professed admirer of that monarch, could not disguise the evidence of the infamous devices to which Henry resorted for the purpose of extorting money from his own subjects. Speaking of his escape from the difficulties which at one time beset him* and particularly from the long and vexatious feuds with Scotland, it is remarked Wherefore nature, which many times is happily contained and refrained by some bands of fortune, began to take place in the King ; carrying, as with ft strong tide, his affections and thoughts unto the gathering and heaping up of treasure. And as kings do more easily find instruments for their will and humour, than for their service and honour, he had gotten for his purpose, or beyond his purpose, two instruments, Empson and Dudley, whom the people esteemed as his horse- 93 leeches and shearers, bold men and careless of fame, and that took t6ll of their master's grist. "Then did they also use to inthral and charge the subjects' lands with tenures in capite,' by finding false offices, and thereby to work upon them for wardships, liveries, primer seisins, and alienations, being the fruits of those tenures, refusing, upon divers pretexts and delays, to admit men to traverse those false offices ac- copding to the law. Nay, the King's wards, after they had accomplished their full age, could not be suffered to have livery of their lands, without paying excessive fines, far exceeding all reasonable rates. They did also vex men with informa tions of intrusion upon scarce colourable titles. " When men were outlawed in personal actions, they would not permit them to purchase their charters of pardon, except they paid great and intolerable sums.; standing upon the strict point of law, which upon outlawries giveth forfeiture of goods ; nay, contrary to all law and colour, they maintained the king ought to have the half of men's lands and rents, during the space of two full years, for a pain in case of outlawry. " And to show further the king's extreme diligence, I do remember to have seen long since a book of accompt of Empson's, that had the king's hand almost to every leaf, by way of signing, and was in some places postilled in the margin with the king's hand likewise, where was this remembrance : " 'Item, Received of such a one five marks, for a pardon to be procured; and if the pardon do not pass, the money to be repaid: except the party be some other ways satisfied.' "And over against this 'memorandum' of the king's own hand, " Otherwise satisfied.' " "Which I do the rather mention, because it shews in the king a nearness, but yet with a kind of justness. So these little sands and grains of gold and silver, as it seemeth, helped not a little to make up the great heap and bank." It is remarkable that the First Patent is to the father and the three sons, "and to the heirs of them, and each of them and their deputies ;" and it is expressly provided that the regions discovered by them, " may not of any other of our subjects be frequented or visited, without the licence of the aforesaid John and his sons, and their deputies, under pain of forfeiture as well of the ships as of all and singular the goods of all them that shall presume to sail to those places so found." Under this grant, the "Londe and Isles" were discovered, and, of course, a right of exclusive resort to these regions, vested in the father and sons for an indefinite period. The patent of 3rd February, 1498, on the other hand, is very cautiously worded. The power given is to the father alone, described as a Venetian, and to his deputies without any words of inheritance. The whole merit of the discovery is, perhaps 94 craftily, represented as embodied in the old man. The privi lege given expired, in strictness, with John Cabot ; and Se bastian, by having incautiously accepted and acted under such an instrument, might be held to recognise it as the consum mation of all that had been previously done, and as a waiver of the terms of the first patent. The Portuguese patentees of 19th March 1501, consent to receive the privilege of exclusive resort for only ten years ; and it is provided that they shall not be interfered with, by virtue of any previous grant to a foreigner (" extraneus") under the gre&tseal (" virtute aut colore alicujus concessionis nostrse sibi Magno Sigillo Nostro per antea factse"). It is true the pen is drawn through this passage in the original Roll ; but attention had evidently been drawn, in an adverse temper, to a claim that might be set up under the previous grant. It was, perhaps, thought better not to aim an ungra cious, and superfluous blow at what had already expired. The clause is retained which secures the new patentees against molestation from any of the king's subjects, and this provision was considered as applying to the surviving sons who, in the original patent, are not, like the father, called Venetians, but were probably all born in England. It is not, however, certain that Henry intended to super sede the claims of Cabot, so far as respected discoveries ac tually made. The general authority to the three Portuguese is as to lands "before unknown to all Christians;" and the reservation may mean more than a caution to respect the rights of foreign nations. The patent of 19th March 1501 gives a wider range for discovery than even the original one to the Cabots. It authorises discoveries to the South ; ad omnes partes, regiones et fines maris Orientalis, Occidentalis, JLustralis, Borealis et Septentrionalis." The two marked words occur in this patent, and also in that of 9th December 1502, but are not found in that of 5th March, 1496. However all this may be, the meagre evidence referred to 95 is all that remains to fill up fifteen years of Cabot's life sub sequent to the first discovery. One fact is too remarkable not to claim especial notice. Amerigo Vespucci accompanied Hojeda, and it is now agreed that this was the first occasion on which he crossed the Atlan tic. Sebastian Cabot was found prosecuting his Third Voyage from England.* Yet, while the name of one overspreads the New World, no bay, cape, or headland recalls the memory of the other. While the falsehoods of one have been diffused with triumphant success, England has suffered to moulder in obscurity, in one of the lanes of the Metropolis, the very Record which establishes the discovery effected by her Great Seaman fourteen months before Columbus beheld the Conti nent, and two years before the lucky Florentine had been West of the Canaries. * See Appendix (B.)- 96 CHAP. XII. CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN FERDINAND OF SPAIN AND LORD WILLOUGH- BTDE BROKE CABOT ENTERS THE SERVICE OF SPAIN 13TH SEPTEM BER, 1512 REVISION OF MAPS AND CHARTS, IN 1 5 1 5-^APPOINTED A MEMBER OF THE COUNCIL OF THE INDIES PROJECTED EXPEDITION TO THE NORTH UNDER HIS COMMAND, TO SAIL IN MARCH 1516 DEATH OF FERDINAND IN JANUARY, 1516 INTRIGUES CABOT RETURNS TO ENGLAND. THE disappearance of Cabot's Maps and Discourses, which were, so long after his death, in the custody of William Wor- thington, ready for publication, cannot but painfully recur to us in contemplating the long period during which we are ab solutely without materials for even conjecturing the manner in which he was employed. These documents would, of course, have supplied abundant information ; but in their absence we are compelled to pass abruptly to the new theatre on which he was called to perform a conspicuous part. Singular as it may appear with regard to a fact so well set tled, as the period at which he quitted his native country and entered the service of Spain, there exist on this point statements quite irreconcilable with each other, and yet equally unfounded. In the Conversation given by Ramusio, and with which the name of Butrigarius has been subse quently connected, Cabot is made to say that the troubles in England led him to seek employment in Spain where he was very graciously received by Ferdinand and Isabella. The queen died in 1504 ; and many English writers, relying on the Conversation, have assumed that Cabot entered a foreign ser vice immediately after his return from the original discovery. Others say, that he first went abroad after the expedition from England in 1517. This assertion is found in the Biogra- 97 phia Britannica, Pinkerton, Rees, Aikin, Chalmers, Camp bell's Lives of the Admirals, &c. The Biographic Univer- selle postpones his departure to 1526. We are told by Peter Martyr (Decade iii. cap. vi.), that Cabot did not leave England until after the death of Henry VII. , which occurred in 1509. The venerable Historian of the Indies is right, and we thus find completed the circle of errors in that deceptive Conversation. Herrera, the writer of the highest authority on these subjects Historiographer of the King of Spain, and enjoying familiar access to every document, stated, more than two centuries ago, that Cabot received his appointment from the King of Spain on the 13th September 1512, and even furnished the particulars of the negotiation. It may readily be conceived that the wily Ferdinand would be anxious to withdraw, if possible, from the service of a youthful monarch, full of enterprise and ambition, and with the accumulated treasures of his thrifty father, a Navigator who had opened to England the glorious career of discovery. He had little reason to hope that Henry would pay greater deference ,than his father to the Papal Bull. Vespucci, too, who had filled in Spain the office of Pilot -Major, was just dead, as appears by a provision for his widow (Navarette, torn. iii. p. 305), on the 28th March, 1512. The period was favourable to Ferdinand's purpose. Henry had, already, consented to mingle rashly in the dissensions of the Conti nent, which finally dissipated the hoards of his father and the resources of his kingdom ; and in this very year, an army was despatched from England, in vessels provided by Spain, to co-operate with his crafty father-in-law. It is now that Her rera (Dec. i. lib. ix. cap. xiii.) speaks of the king's anxiety to discover the long sought strait, his views on Baccalaos, and his wish to gather round him all the ablest Cosraographers of the time. We are expressly told that these motives induced him. N 98 " A traer a su servicio a Sebastian Gaboto, Ingles, por tenir noticia que era esperto hombre de Mar y para esto escrivio a Milort Ulibi Capilan General del Key de Ingleterra que se le embiasse y esto fufr a treze de Septembre deste anno Sebastian Gaboto vino a Castilla y el Rey le dio titulo da su Capitan, y buenas gages, y quedo en su servicio y le mando residir en Sevilla, para lo que se le or- denasse."" There is no difficulty, in recognising, through the disguise of the Spanish orthography, the name of Lord Willoughby. That nobleman is found at the head of a Commission for levy ing troops, dated 29th March, 1511 (Rymer, vol. xiii. p. 297), and immediately followed by a letter from Ferdinand to Henry, dated Seville, 20th April, 1511, relative to the proposed co-operation. Lord Willoughby landed at Plai- sance with the English army from the Spanish vessels on the 8th June, 1512 (Herbert's Life of Henry VIIL, p. 20). Surprise will doubtless be felt, that any misconception should exist as to a fact so clearly established. But Herrera is known in this country only through a wretched translation, made about a century ago by a " Captain John Stevens," re plete with errors, and in which many passages of the greatest interest are entirely omitted. Amongst the rest, not a sylla ble of what has j ust been quoted is found in it. Unfortunately, too, for the credit of those who cite Herrera, this translator has changed the order of Decades, Books, and Chapters, and yet given no notice that he had taken such a liberty. The reader, therefore, who attempts to verify the references of most English authors, will find them agreeing very well with the book of Stevens, but furnishing no clew to the passages of the original. The Correspondence referred to by Herrera between Fer dinand and Lord Willoughby, would seem to have been * "To draw into his service Sebastian Cabot, an Englishman, having heard of his ability as a seaman; and with this view he wrote to Lord Uliby, Captain-Gene ral of the King of England, to send him over, and it was on the 13th of Septem ber of this year (1512) that Cabot came to Spain. The King gave him the title of his Captain, and a liberal allowance, and retained him in his service, directing that he should reside at Seville to await orders." 99 extant about a century ago, if we may judge from the lan guage used in the "Ensaio Cronologico Para La Historia General De Florida," published at Madrid in 1723. This work, though it appeared under the name of Cardenas, is understood to have been the production of Andre Goncalez Barcia, Auditor of the supreme council of War of the King of Spain. In the Introduction, the author, after conjecturing the motives which led Cabot to abandon England without re luctance, remarks " Y aunque conserve siempre la Fama de Cosmografo, no se hico caso de el, en Inglaterra, hasta que el Rei de Espana, por el mes de Septembre de 1512, entendiendo de Algunas Cosmografos que avia algun estrecho a la parte de la Tierra de los Baccalaos y otro a Occident e, escrivio a Milord Ulibi, Capitan General de Inglaterra, le embiase a Gaboto, lo qual egecuto luego, como cosa que le importaba poco."* The readiness with which Lord Willoughby yielded to the request of the Spanish monarch, and his making light of the favour conferred, would seem to be facts that could only be gathered from the Correspondence itself. We may presume it to be not now in existence, or documents so curious would doubtless have been published by Navarette. No specific duties were, in the first instance, assigned to Cabot; but his value was quickly discerned .and appreciated. We find him, in 1515, mentioned (Herrera, Dec. ii. lib. i. cap. xii.) in connexion with an object, about which the King was very solicitous a general revision- of Maps and Charts; and in that year, Peter Martyr (Dec. iii. cap. vi.) speaks of him as holding the dignified and important station of a Mem ber of the Council of the Indies. The same writer informs us " And though he maintained always his reputation as cosmographer, yet no account was made of him in England; and, at length, the King of Spain, in the middle of September 1512, understanding from cosmographers that there was a Strait in some part of the land of Baccalaos, communicating with another in the West, wrote to Lord Vlibi, Captain-General of England, to send Cabot to him. which he did forthwith as a thing of little moment." 100 that an expedition had been projected to sail in March 1516, under *the command of Cabot, in search of the North- West Passage. "Familiarem habeo domi Cabotum ipsum et contubernalem interdum Fbcatus namque ex Britannia a Rege nostro Catholico post Henrid Majoris Britannia Regis mortem concurialis noster est expectatque Indies ut navigia sibi parcntur quibus arcanum hoc nature latens jam tandem detegatur. Martio mense anni futuri MDXVI. puto ad explorandum discessurum. - Quae succedent tua San-citas per me intelliget modo vivere detur. Ex Castellanis non desunt qui Cabotum primum fuisse Baccalorum repertorem negant, tantumque ad Occidentem tetendisse minime assentiuntur.*" This passage, while it proves that his talents had been re cognised and rewarded by the king, and that his personal character had endeared him to the historian, also shows that there already existed against the successful stranger, the same malignant jealousy to which Columbus fell a victim. Unfor tunately for Cabot, Ferdinand died on the 23rd of January, 1516. This circumstance would seem to have put an end to the contemplated expedition, and it is probable that in the scenes which immediately followed, full scope was given to that feeling of dislike and pretended distrust, which had not dared to exhibit itself, in any marked manner, during the king's life. Charles V., occupied elsewhere, did not reach Spain for a considerable time. The original publication of the three first Decades of Peter Martyr has a Dedication to him, dated October 1516, in which the youthful sovereign is entreated to enter at once on a consideration of the wonders of that New World with which the work is occupied " Come 4 Cabot is my very friend whom I use familiarly, and delight to have him sometimes keepe me companie in my own house. For being calledout of England by the commandment of the Catholic King of Castile, after the death of King Henry of England the Seventh of that name, he was made one of our Council and assistance as touching the affairs of the New Indies, looking daily for ships to be furnished for him to discover this hid secret of nature. This voyage is appointed to be begun in March in the year next following, being the year of Christ 1516. "What shall succeed, your Holiness shall be advertised by ray letters if God grant me life. Some of the Spaniards deny that Cabot was the first finder of Baccalaos, and affirm that he went not so far westward." Eden's translation, Decades, fcl. 119. 101 therefore most Noble Prince, elected of God, and enjoy that high Estate not yet fully understood," &c. During what may be called the interregnum, a scene of the most odious intrigue was exhibited. All the great qualities of Chievres, the Prime Minister, and favourite of the young King, were sullied with an ignoble and sordid avarice. The accession of his master to the Crown of Spain, opened a new and copious source for the grati fication of this passion. During the time of Charles's residence in Flanders, the whole tribe of pretenders to office or to favour, resorted thither. They soon discovered that without the patronage of Chievres, it was vain to hope for pre ferment ; nor did they want sagacity to find out the proper method of securing him. Vast sums of money were drawn out of Spain. Every thing was venal and disposed of to the highest bidder. After the example of Chievres, the inferior Flemish Ministers engaged in this traffic, which became as general and avowed as it was infamous.*** A curious illustration of the truth of these representations is found amongst the -papers lately published by Navarette. A letter occurs (torn. iii. p. 307), from Charles to Bishop Fonseca, dated Brussels 18th November 1516, which states a representation by Andres de St Martin, that on the death of Amerigo Vespucci, about five years before, the late king had intended to confer on the said St Martin the office of Pilot -Major, but that owing to accidental circumstances this intention was frustrated, and Juan Dias de Solis appointed. The latter being now dead, St Martin had preferred a claim to the appointment. Charles commands Fonseca to inquire into the facts, and also into the capacity and fitness of the ap plicant. We may conceive that, at such a period, the pros pect was a cheerless one for Cabot, previously regarded, as has been seen, with obloquy. It is of evil omen, also, to find in authority the intriguer Fonseca, who has obtained an in famous notoriety as the enemy of Columbus against whom his most successful weapon was the Spanish jealousy of foreigners. Finding himself slighted, Cabot returned to England. * Robertson's Charles V. Book I. 103 CHAP. XIII. CABOT'S VOYAGE OF 1517 FROM ENGLAND IN SEARCH OF THE NORTH WEST PASSAGE. THE enterprising and intrepid spirit of our Navigator would seein to have found immediate employment, and he is again on the Ocean. He was aided, doubtless, by being able to point to his own name in Letters Patent, granted so long be fore by the father of the reigning monarch, whose provisions could not, in justice, be considered as extinct. For a knowledge of this expedition, we are indebted, prin cipally, to Richard Eden, that friend of Cabot, to whom a tribute of gratitude has been heretofore paid. He published in 1553 a work* bearing this title "A treatyse of the Newe India, with other new founde landes and Ilandes, as well Eastwarde as Westwarde, as they are known and found in these cure dayes after the description of Sebastian Munster, in his booke of Universal Cosmogra- phie ; wherein the diligent reader may see the good successe and rewarde of noble and honest enterprizes, by the which not only worldly ryches are obtayned, but also God is glorified, and the Christian fayth enlarged. Translated out of Latin into English, by Bycharde Eden. Prxter spem sub spe. Imprinted at London, inLombarde street, by Edward Sutton, 1553." The volume is dedicated to the Duke of Northumberland. The checks are so many and powerful on a departure from truth, even aside from the character of the writer, as to relieve us from any apprehension of mis-statement. Cabot then re sided in England, occupying a conspicuous station. The passage about to be quoted contains a reproach on a sea- officer, of the time of Henry VIII. , and it is not likely that such expressions would be addressed to one who had been * In the Library of the British Museum, title in catalogue, Munster. 103 Lord High Admiral in that reign, unless the facts were no torious and indisputable, particularly while many of those engaged in the expedition were living. The following is the language of the Dedication * Which manly courage (like unto that which hath been seen and proved in your Grace, as well in forene realmes as also in this our country) if it had not been wanting in other in these our dayes at such time as our sovereigne Lord of noble memory, King Henry the Eighth, about the same [eighth] yere of his raygne, furnished and set forth certen shippes under the governaunce of Sebastian Cabot yet living, and one Sir Thomas Perte, whose faynt heart was the cause that that viage toke none effect, if (I say) such manly courage whereof we have spoken had not at that tyme bene wanting, it myghte happelye have come to passe that thatriche treasurye called Perularia (which is now in Spayne, in the citie of Civile and so named, for that in it is kepte the infinite ryches brought thither from the newe- foundland of Peru myght longe since have bene in the Tower of London, to the Kinges great honoure and welth of this his realme." With this passage Hakluyt (vol. iii. p. 498) properly con nects the language employed by Robert Thorne in 1527, in a letter addressed to Henry VIII. The object of Thorne (Hakluyt, vol. i. p. 212) was to urge a search for the passage in the North, and he suggests three routes the North-Eastern, afterwards attempted by Willoughby the North-Western and, finally, a course directly over the Pole, giving a prefer ence, so far as may be inferred from order in suggestion, to the first " Yet these dangers or darkness hath not letted the Spaniards and Portuguese and others, to discover many unknown realms to their great peril. Which con sidered (and that your Graces subjects may have the same light) it will seem your Graces subjects to be without activity or courage, in leaving to do this glorious and noble enterprise. For they being past this little way which they named so dangerous, (which may be two or three leagues before they come to the Pole, and as much more after they pass the Pole) it is clear, that from thenceforth the seas and lands are as temperate as in these parts, and that then it may be at the will and pleasure of the mariners, to choose whether they will sail by the coasts that be cold, temperate or hot. For they being past the Pole, it is plain they may decline to what part they list. " If they will go toward the Orient, they shall enjoy the regions of all the Tar- tariansthat extend toward the midday, and from thence they may go and proceed to the land of the Chinese, and from thence to the land of Cathaio Oriental, which >s, of all the main land, most Oriental that can be reckoned from our habitation. And if, from thence, they do continue their navigation, following the coasts that return toward the Occident, they shall fall in with Malaca, and so with all the In- 104 dies which we call Oriental, and following the way, may return hither by the Cape of Buona Speransa; and thus they shall compass the whole world. And if they will take their course after they be past the Pole, toward the Occident, they shall go in the backside of the Newfoundland, and which of late was discovered by your Grace's servants, until they came to the backside and south seas of the Indies Oc cidental. And so continuing their-voyage, they may return through the strait of Magellan to this country, and so they compass also the world by that wayj and if they go this third way, and after they be past the Pole, go right toward the Pole antarctic, and then decline towards the lands, and islands situated between- the Tropics, and under the Equinoctial, without doubt they shall find there the rich est lands and islands of the World of Gold, precious stones, balmes, spices, and other things that we here esteem most which come out of strange countries, and may return the same way. *' By this it appeareth, your Grace hath not only a great advantage of the riches, but also your subjects shall not travel halfe of the way that others do, which go round about as aforesaid." He remarks again , "To which places there is left one way to discover, which is into the North; /or that of the four parts of the world, it seemeth thre.e parts are discovered by other princes; For out of Spaine they have discovered all the Indies and seas Occidental, and out of Portugal all the Indies and seas Oriental: so that by this part of the. Orient and Occident, they' have compassed the world. For the one of them departing toward the Orient, and the other toward the Occident, met again in the course or way of the midst of the day, and so then was discovered a great part of the same seas and coasts by the Spaniards. So that now rest to be discovered the said North parts, the which it seemeth to me is only your charge and duty. Because the situation of this your realm is thereunto nearest and apt- st of all others j and also for that you have already taken it in hand. And in mine opinion it will not seem well to leave so .great and profitable an enterprise, seeing it may so easily and with so little cost, labor, and danger, be followed and ob tained, though heretofore your Grace hath made-/Aera>/ a proofe, and found not the commodity thereby as you trusted, at this time it shall be no impedient. For there may be now provided remedies for things, then lacked* and the inconve niences and lets removed, that then were cause that your Grace's desire took no /ull effect, which is, the courses to be changed, ami followed the aforesaid new courses. And concerning the mariners, ships, and provisions, an order may be devised and taken meet and convenient, much better than hitherto. By reason whereof, and by God's grace, no doubt your purpose shall take effect. Surely the cost herein will be nothing, in comparison to the great profit. The labour is much less, yea nothing at all, where so great honour and glory is hoped for; and considering well the courses, truly the danger and way is shorter to us, than to Spain or Portugal, as by evident reasons appeareth." It would seem impossible to doubt that the writer here puts distinctly to Henry, as the two grounds for looking to the North, the advantageous position of his own dominions in 105 reference to a passage in that quarter, and the fact that his former experiment had taken that direction. Hakluyt approached the subject under a misconception, the source of which will presently be pointed out, that Cabot had gone to the South on this occasion, and supposes that he finds a confirmation of it in that part of the passage quoted from Thorne, which speaks of a change of the courses. Not only, however, is this assumption against the evidence from other quarters, but Thome's own words repel it. He had just suggested a passage by the North, and then eagerly anti cipates and answers the objections which might be urged, and it naturally occurs to him as the most forcible of these, that the king had already made a proof in that quarter without success. Could he have apprehended such an objection to his project from a failure in the South? To suppose that he wished to combat the presumption against the existence of a strait arising from ill success there, will appear ridiculous, if we note that the passage in the South had been, in point of fact, discovered by Magellan, and is actually referred to by Thorne as affording a convenient route for the return voyage. The words on which Hakluyt would lay this undue stress have ample operation when, aside from the various courses for attempting a North- West passage, here were two others suggested, and a seeming preference given to that by the North-East. Captain Parry took many different " courses" with a more limited object in view. In the reference made by Thorne to the Newfoundland, "which of late was discovered by your Grace's subjects" he evidently treats as an original discovery that further ad vance to the North, which we may presume to have been made on this occasion. The same person, in his letter to Dr Ley (1 Hakluyt, p. 219), speaking of the passage by the North, remarks, that he^ probably, derived the " inclination or desire of this discovery" from his father, who, " with ano ther merchant of Bristow, named Hugh Eliot, were the dis coverers of the Newfoundlands." Now, we have seen his O 106 previous application of the epithet, which is, in truth, most appropriate to the latest discovery. Couple this with another fact. The name of Thome does not occur in any of the patents. Of the two to which we shall have occasion here after to advert, subsequent to those of the Cabots, one is dated 19th March, 1501, and is in favour of certain Portu guese, who are associated with three merchants of Bristol, Richard Ward, Thomas Ashehurst, and John Thomas. This is now, for the first time, published from the Rolls in the pre sent volume. The last patent bears date 9th December, 1502, and is found in Rymer (vol. xiii. p. 37). The names of Ward and Thomas are dropped, and Hugh Eliot is asso ciated with Ashehurst and the Portuguese. Thus the name with which Thome connects that of his father does not ap pear until this late period. We have no doubt that when, after an interval of fifteen years, the reappearance of Cabot called attention to this patent, which had lain dormant, Thorne acquired from Ashehurst or his representatives the interest of that person. Robert Thorne, the son, speaks of the two associates, " my father, who, with another merchant of Bris- tow, named Hugh Eliot/' a language well agreeing with the explanation suggested. It appears from the epitaph of Robert Thorne (S tow's Sur vey of London, and Fuller's Worthies), that he was born in 1492, a circumstance that may assist in enabling us to sup pose his father at a not very advanced age in 1516. A striking instance of the inaccuracy of Purchas, occurs in his statement of the expression used by Thorne. He says (Pilgrims, vol. iv. p. 1812), " Robert Thorne, in a book to Doctor Leigh, writeth, that his father, with another mer chant of Bristol, Hugh Eliot, were the first discoverers of the Newfoundlands." Had Thorne really said "first" he must have intended deception ; but no such word is found either in the letter itself (Hakluyt, vol. i. p. 219), or in Hakluyt's subsequent reference to it (vol. iii. p. 10). The absence of the very epithet which Purchas deemed it necessary to inter- 107 poLte, in order to suit his own notion of what was meant, forms a strong argument to prove, what is sufficiently clear from the context, that Thome alludes to the recent discovery made by the subjects of Henry VIII. It may be repeated, then, that in his speculations on the North-West Passage, Thome says, " And if they will take their course after they be past the Pole toward the West, they shall go on the back side of the Newfoundland which of late was discovered \sy your Grace's subjects, until they come to the back side and South seas of the Indies Occident al." Thus by advancing resolutely in the route before taken in the North by " his Grace's subjects," the Western side of the American Continent would be attained. Now it is re markable, that in speaking of the effort made under the aus pices of Hugh Eliot and his father, he says to Dr Ley (Hak- luyt, vol. i. p. 219), "of which there is no doubt (as now plainly appeareth), if the mariners would then have been ruled and followed their pilot's mind the lands of the West Indies (from whence all the gold cometh) had been ours, for all is one coast as by the card appeareth and is aforesaid." Thus we find that the frustration of the object is imputed to those who refused to follow their pilot's wishes, and that the golden visions of Thorne are those belonging to a successful prosecution of the North- Western Discovery. Is it possible to hesitate about connecting this with the language of Eden as to the faint-heartedness of Sir Thomas Pert, and the general opinion, in 1553, that owing to that faint-heartedness the trea sures of Peru were at Seville instead of the Tower of Lon don? The manner in which Hakluyt and subsequent writers have been betrayed into error with regard to this expedition re mains to be considered. 108 CHAP. XIV. HAKLUYT'S ERROR WITH REGARD TO THE VOYAGE OF 1517. HAKLUYT was under an impression that there should be taken in connexion with this voyage a passage in the Spanish histo rian Oviedo, of which he found a translation in Ramusio. It is but just that he should be fully heard on this point " Moreover it seemeth that Gonsalvo de Oviedo, a famous Spanish writer, alludeth unto the sayde voyage in the beginning of the 13th chapter of the 19th booke of his generall and natural historic of the West Indies^ agreeing very weU With the time about which Richard Eden writeth that the foresaid voyage was be gun. The author's wordes are these, as I finde them translated into Italian by that excellent and famous man Baptista Ramusius.* 3 * After giving the Italian version, Hakluyt proceeds "This extract importeth thus much in English, to wit: ' That in the yeere 1517, an English rover, under the colour of travelling to discover, came with a great shippe unto the parts of Brasill, on the coaste of the firme lande, and from thence he crossed over unto this Hand of Hispaniola, and arrived neere unto the mouth of the haven of the citie of S. Domingo, and sent his shipboate full of men on shore, and demanded leave to enter into this haven, saying that he came with merchandise to traffique. But at that very instant the governour of the castle, .Francis de Tapia, caused a tire of ordinance to be shot from the castle at the ship, for she bare in directly with the haven. When the Englishmen sawe this, they withdrew themselves out, and those that were in the shipboate, got themselves, with all speede, on ship-board. And in trueth the warden of the castle committed an oversight: for if the shippe had entred into the haven, the men thereof could not have come on lande without leave both of the citie and of the castle. Therefore the people of the ship seeing how they were received, sayled toward the Hand of S. John, and entering into the port of S. Germaine, the English men parled with those of the towne, requiring victuals and things needefull to furnish their ship, and complained of the inhabitants of the city of S. Domingo, saying that they came not to doe any harme, but to trade and traffique for their money and merchandise. In this place they had certaine victuals, and for recompense they gave and paid them with certain vessels of wrought tinne and other things. And * Hakluyt, vol. iii. p. 499. 109 afterward they departed toward Europe, where it is thought they arrived not; for we never heard any more newes of them.'/* Herrera has an account of the visit somewhat more at large (Dec. ii. lib. v. cap. iii.), and refers to the statement of Gines Navarro, the captain of a caravel of St Domingo, who happening to be at St John when the English vessel arrived at that Island, went off to her, supposing her to be of his own country. According to him, the ship was of two hundred and fifty tons burthen, and had on board sixty men. She was accompanied by a pinnace having two guns in her bows, with twenty-five men armed with crossbows and wearing corslets. The commander of the ship offered to show his instructions from the king of England (" la instruccion que llevaba de el Rei de Inglaterra"), and requested Navarro to proceed in company with his own vessel to show the way to St Domingo. The English were plentifully supplied with provisions, and had a great quantity of woollen and linen goods with other merchandise, for the purpose of traffic. They effected at St John's a barter of some tin, and proceeding afterwards to St Domingo, sent a boat ashore with a message that their object was trade, and remained off the island for two days. The commander of the fort sent to the authorities for instructions how to act, and not receiving a timely answer fired, on his own responsibility, at the strangers, on which they recalled their boat and went round to the Island of St John, and after remaining some time carrying on a barter with the inhabitants of the town of St Germain, disappeared. The account which, according to Navarro, they gave of themselves, was this: " They said that they were Englishmen, and that the ship was from England, and th&t she and her consort had been equipped to go and seek the land of the Great Cham, that they had been separated in a tempest, and that the ship pur. suing her course had been in a frozen sea, and found great islands of ice, and that taking a different course, they came into a warm sea, which boiled like water in a kettle, and lest it might open the seams of the vessel they proceeded to examine * Ib. 110 the Baccalaos, where they found fifty sail of vessels, Spanish, French, and Portu guese, engaged in fishing; that going on shore to communicate with the natives, the pilot, a native of Piedmont, was killed; that they proceeded afterwards along the coast to the river Chicory, and crossed over thence to the island of St John. Asking them what they sought in these islands, they said that they wished to ex plore in order to make report to the King of England, and to procure a load of the Brasil wood." Such was the report of Navarro. The officer commanding the fort was arrested, because by his precipitate conduct the opportunity was lost of ascertaining who were the intruders, and what their object. On the facts being reported to the emperor, he viewed them with great uneasiness, and wished that in the Island of St Domingo they had proceeded in a different manner, and either by force or stratagem got pos session of the vessel. He was struck with the inconveniences likely to result from English vessels frequenting those parts, and gave strict orders that on their again appearing, measures should be adopted for taking them and making an example of them." These circumstances are adverted to, for the purpose of showing the attention which was excited by this visit, and the anxious examination, doubtless, undergone by Navarro who had communicated with the strangers. When Herrera was ordered by Philip II. to prepare his History, there were sub mitted to him documents of every description, even the most minute (Decade vi. lib. iii. cap. 19) . His statement, then, which goes thus into detail, was, probably, derived from the Examination, and it establishes a representation, that the Englishmen spoke of the Baccalaos as a point at which they had touched on their return from a struggle with the perils of the navigation further North, There is found in Purchas (Pilgrims, vol. iii. p. 855), a Description of the West Indies," by Herrera, being the introduction to the history, with a remark, "This author hath written eight Decades of the Spanish Acts in the West Indies, which give great light to those parts, but would be too long for this work." The influence of the passage just quoted is Ill curiously visible in Purchas. On reading it, he saw, at once, that the statement of Navarro had reference to the visit spoken of by Oviedo, and it therefore passed into his mind that the expedition proceeded, in the first instance, to the North. When he had occasion, however, to advert to the circumstance afterwards, he evidently could not recollect whence he had derived the impression, or there would have been found a reference to Herrera in his ambitious margin, instead of the vague assertion: " Afterwards the same Sir Sebastian Cabot was sent, A.t>. 1516, by king Henry the VIII., together with Sir Thomas Pert, Vice- Admiral of England/ which after coasting this Continent the second time, as I have read 9 discovered the Coast of Brasil, and returned from thence to St Domingo and Porto Rico" (vol. iv. p. 1812). A peculiar anxiety is felt with regard to this voyage, be cause it bears directly on our estimate of Cabot's character. He had taken up, with all the ardour which belongs to the conceptions of a man of his stamp, the opinion that a North- West passage was practicable, and we are grieved as well as surprised, to find him apparently faltering in the pursuit. We know from Peter Martyr, his undiminished confidence in 1515, and cannot understand why, immediately afterwards, he should be found in a confused, rambling voyage to the South, instead of following up his great purpose. The examination thus far has assumed that the date given by Ramusio, in his translation of Oviedo, and adopted by E[ak- luyt, is correct. It now remains to show that there has been an entire misconception on this point, and that Hakluyt has paid the deserved penalty of his folly in quoting a Spanish book from an Italian translation. The reference is correctly given to book xix. cap. xiii. of Oviedo ; but on turning to the passage, he is found to repre sent the visit of the English ship as occurring not in 1517, but in 1527. There are in the library of the British Mu seum the edition of his work published at Seville in 1535, and the next edition, corrected by the author, published at 112 Salamanca, in 1547. In the king's library there is a copy of the latter edition. The date given in both editions is MDXXVII. It may be very idle to attempt to fortify the state ment of a writer of the highest credit, and who resided in St Domingo at the very period in question; but the fact may be mentioned that his narrative had not only carried him up to this period but beyond it, for in. a preceding chapter (the vii.) of the same book, he speaks of an incident which oc curred in September, 1530. As the reliance of Hakluyt is exclusively on the "famous Spanish writer Oviedo," it might be sufficient to shift to its proper side of the scale the weight which has been thus mis placed. The point, however, is one of interest, in reference to the subsequent voyage from England, in 1527, and we may draw to the rectification the testimony of Herrera. That writer, it is true, affixes no date to the visit, and while considering, at an early period, the condition of the colonies, he adverts to this as one of the circumstances which had led to complaint and uneasiness* This sort of grouping is always dangerous in the hands of an ambitious and florid historian, anxious to be relieved from a chronological detail of isolated facts, and to treat them in combination, and in their supposed influence on results. He has, while considering an early incident, taken up this and others which, though pos terior in point of time, yet preceded the measures of pre caution, of which they, in succession, indicated the necessity. The question is placed beyond doubt by another occurrence almost contemporary. Oviedo, in the same chapter which refers to the Visk of the English vessel, adds, that about a year afterwards ("desde a poco tiempo o en el siguiente an- no"), a French corsair made its appearance at Cuba, guided by a villainous Spaniard, named Diego Ingenio (" guiado por un mal Espagnol llamado Diego Ingenio"). This inci dent is mentioned by Herrera, under the year 1529, and he states it to have taken place in the middle of October of that year (Herrera, Dec. iv~ lib. vi. chap. xii.). His next chap- 113 ter (xiii.) is occupied with the precautions taken for the secu rity of the Indies, and they are expressly referred to the visit of the English and French Ships.* Thus is obtained a de cided, though superfluous, confirmation of the accuracy of Oviedo. So soon as we are assured of his real statement, the im probability that this visit could have been on the part of Ca bot's expedition occurs with irresistible force. Is it at all likely that one who had just quitted the service of Spain, and ^vho knew the jealous system of exclusion auopted with regard to her American possessions, would be found en gaged in a silly and confused attempt to carry on a commerce in that quarter? Again, is it not probable that Navarro would have recognized one whom we may presume to have been familiarly known to the seamen of that day ? Would a man, moreover, who had been one of the captains of the King of Spain, and afterwards a member of the council of the Indies, have been anxious to open a communication with the author ities of St Domingo ? Cabot would have known not only that the application was idle, but that it would subject him to the most odious reproaches, for endeavouring to turn against Spain the knowledge acquired by having so recently heldji confi dential post in her service. This last consideration, indeed, suggests a pleasing reflec tion that his fame may be successfully relieved from the sus picion of having, even at a moment of pique, consented to engage in such an enterprise. The pure and lofty character to which all the incidents of his life lay claim, renders us unwil ling to credit what could not but be deemed derogatory. His vindication has already, it is hoped, been made- out; and when we come, in its proper place, to a voyage from England, in 1527, under totally diiferent auspices, there will be seen * *' Con occasion de la nave Inglesa que havia llegada al JPuerto de la Ciudad de Santo Domingo de la Isla Espanola, i de los Franceses de que se ha tratado en cl capitulo precedente, el Obispo de Santo Domingo, Presidente del Audencia higo una Junta de todos las Estados de la Isla, adonde se confirio lo que se debia hacer," &c. P 114 the happy application of what Oviedo correctly refers to that year. By keeping separate the clews which Hakluyt has crossed and entangled, there will be attained, in each case, a point from which a survey may be made with the greatest clearness and assurance of accuracy. 115 CHAP. XV. VOYAGE OF 1517 THE ONE REFERRED TO BY CABOT IN HIS LETTER TO RAMUSIO. IT being, then, certain that the expedition of 1517 had for its object the North- West Passage, was it on the llth June 1517, that Cabot attained the point mentioned in his letter to Ramusio ? The day of the month is given, not only in that let ter but again by Sir Humphrey Gilbert (iii. Hakluyt, p. 16), from Cabot's map. Many circumstances of corroboration press on us. When Eden speaks, in magnificent phrase, of the opportunity lost to England of taking the lead of Spain, his language is naturally referable, as has been said, to the frus tration of that great effort to find a way to Cataya which Cabot had already essayed, and which Peter Martyr, in 1515, expressly tells us he was on the eve of again undertaking. In the letter to Ramusio, Cabot declares that when arrested at 67 and-a-half by the timidity of his associates, he was san guine of success, and that if not overruled he both could and would have gone to Cataya. Does not Eden, then, merely sup ply the name of the principal object of this reproach ? Let us refer again to the language of Thorne, which applies, we know, to the expedition of 1517 (i. Hakluyt, p. 219), "Of the which there is no doubt, as now plainly appeareth, if the mariners would then have been ruled and followed their pilot's mind, the lands of the West-Indies, from whence all the gold cometh, had been ours." Can it be doubted that these sev eral passages all point to the same incident ? In the work of Peter Martyr, written before this last voy age, no allusion is found to a mutiny in the North, but he mentions expressly that in the South the expedition was stop 116 ped by a failure of provisions. While conveying such minute information he would hardly have failed to advert to a fact so remarkable in itself, and bearing moreover so directly on the question of the supposed practicability of the enterprise. On the occasion alluded to, the lat. of 67 and-a-half had been attained on the llth June. This could not have been in 1497, because land was first seen on the 24th of June of that year. With regard to the expedition of 1498, which Peter Martyr and Gomara are supposed more particularly to refer to, the month of July is named as that in which the great struggle with the ice occurred. Did not Cabot, then, in structed by experience, sail from England earlier in the year than on the former occasions? In order to be within the eighth year of Henry VIII. mentioned by Eden, he must have got off before the 22nd of April, if he sailed in 1517. The advance on this occasion was so far beyond what had been made on former voyages, that Thorne does not hesitate to give to the region newly visited the designation of New foundland ; and it was then probably that Cabot " sailed into Hudson's Bay and gave English names to sundry places there in."* No date is mentioned by Ramusio for the voyage alluded to in Cabot's letter, though from his speaking of that Navigator as having made discoveries in the time of Henry VII. , the reader might be led to refer it to that early period. One ex pression is remarkable. After stating Cabot's long- continued course West with a quarter of the North, and his reaching 67 and-a-half, Ramusio says that he would have gone further but for the " malignita del padrone et de marinari sollevati" (the refusal of the master and the mutinous mariners). We can hardly err in referring this allusion to Sir Thomas Pert, " whose faint heart," according to Eden, "was the cause that the voyage took none effect." * Anderson's History of Commerce, vol. i. p. 549. M'Pherson's Annals of Com merce, vol. ii. p. 12. 117 It only remains to express a hope that as the errors with regard to this voyage had become so firmly fixed, and their rectification was so important to the fame of Cabot, the pre ceding tedious detail will be excused. Dr Robertson, who it appears by the list of authorities prefixed to his History of America knew of Oviedo only through the Italian translation, thus speaks of the memorable expedition : " Some merchants of Bristol having fitted out two ships for the southern regions of America, committed the conduct of them to Sebastian Cabot, who had quitted the service of Spain. He visited the coasts of Brazil, and touched at the islands of Hispaniola and Porto Rico," &c (Book ix. ) And in a work of the present year (Lardner's Cyclopaedia, Maritime and In land Discovery, vol. ii. p. 138), it is said, "Sebastian Cabot sailed in 1516 with Sir John Pert to Porto Rico, and after wards returned to Spain," 118 CHAP. XVI. CABOT APPOINTED, IN 1518, PILOT-MAJOR. OF SPAIN SUMMONED TO AT TEND THE CONGRESS AT BADAJOS IN 1524 PROJECTED EXPEDITION UNDER HIS COMMAND TO THE MOLUCCAS. THE result of the expedition of 1517, however it may have added in England to the fame of Cabot for ardent enterprise and dauntless intrepidity, was not such as to lead immediately to a renewed effort. There had been a failure ; and a second expedition might be frustrated by similar causes. The mer chants who were engaged in it had probably sustained a heavy loss, and the king was at that time full of anxious speculations about the affairs of the Continent. The horrible Sweating- Sickness, too, which, from July to December 1517, spread death and dismay not only through the court and the city, but over the whole kingdom, suspending even the ordinary operations of commerce, left no time to think of the prosecu tion of a distant and precarious enterprise. It is probable, therefore, that Cabot might have languished in inactivity but for the new and more auspicious aspect of affairs in Spain. If the youthful successor of Ferdinand had looked into the volume dedicated to him by Peter Martyr, containing a faith ful and copious account of that splendid empire in the west to which he had succeeded, he could not fail to be struck with the memorable enterprise of Cabot, and the estimate of his character by that honest chronicler. The records, too, would show the pains which had been taken to secure his services, and the posts of honour and confidence to which he had been rapidly advanced. It would doubtless be asked, what had been the issue of that expedition under his com mand, which it appeared was to sail in March 1516. Coup- 119 ling its abandonment with what he found stated of the jealous denial of that Navigator's merits by the Spaniards, the sa gacity of Charles could hardly fail to detect the secret causes of Cabot's disappearance. Immediate measures in the way of atonement would seem to have been taken. In 1518 Cabot was named Pilot-Major of Spain.* The appointment is noted in the general arrangement and scheme of reformation of that year, but we find it announced again in 1520, (Dec. ii. lib. ix. cap. vii.) with the instruc tions of the emperor that no pilot should proceed to the Indies without previous examination and approval by him. f Possi bly, therefore, the final arrangement was not concluded until the visit of Charles V. to England in the latter year. It would seem that there was no intermediate Pilot Major between Juan de Solis and Cabot, for in a Royal order of 16th No vember 1523, relative to a charge in the time of De Solis, on the salary of the office (Navarette, torn. iii. p. 308), Cabot is spoken of as his successor. The functions of this office, though of great importance and responsibility, supply, of course, but few incidents for record. We might expect to find the project of the North- West pass age revived, but many considerations were opposed to it. The same reasons which suggested the passage in the North as so desirable to England, on account of her local position, would disincline Spain from the search ; and we accordingly find, that the only feeble efforts in reference to it were those of Cortez and Gomez on the southern coast of North America. All eyes were directed to the South. Peter Martyr is even impatient that attention should be turned towards Florida where Ayllon had landed in 1523, and made a tedious report as to its productions. " What need have we of these things * Herrera, Dec. ii. lib. iii. cap. vii. Ensaio Chronologico para la Florida, In troduction- fDiose titulo Piloto Major k Sebastian Gaboto con orden que ningun Pilot' pasase a las Indias sin ser primero por el examinado i aprobado. 120 which are common with all the people of Europe? To the South ! To the South! They that seek riches must not go to the eold and frozen North" (Dec. viii. cap. x.). The hopes of adventurers were directed to the Moluccas, through the passage which Magellan had been fortunate enough to find in 53, through toils and perils so much less than those which had been encountered in vain in the North. The next men tion we find of Cabot, is a reference to his opinion (Herrera, Dec. iiu lib. iv. cap. xx.), as to the existence of many islands worthy of being explored, in the same region with the Mo luccas. Seeing that the spirit of enterprise had taken this direction, he seems to have looked to 1 it as affording a chance of more active employment than his present office. An in cident soon brought him conspicuously forward in connexion with this region. Portugal had interposed an earnest representation that the Moluccas fell within the limits assigned to her under the Pa pal Bull, and she remonstrated, in the strongest terms, against any attempt on the part of Spain to carry on a commerce in that quarter.* The emperor decided, therefore, that a solemn conference should be held, at which the subject might be fully discussed and an opportunity afforded to Portugal of stating her pretensions. The son of Columbus, Ferdinand, was also present^ In attendance on this remarkable assemblage, were the men most famed for their nautical knowledge and experience ; not as members, but for the purpose of reference as occasion might arise. At the head of a list of these, we find the name of Cabot4 The conference was held at Badajos, in April 1 524, and on the 31st May the decision was solemnly proclaimed, declaring that the Moluccas were situate, by at least 20, within the Spanish limits. The Portuguese retired in disgust, and rumours immediately reached Spain, that the young king of Portugal was preparing a great fleet to maintain his pre- * Peter Martyr, Dec. vi. cap. ix. f Peter Martyr, Dec. vi. cap. x. * Gomara, cap. c-i Herrera, Dec. iii. lib. vi. cap. vi.; Eden, Decades, fol. 241. 121 tensions by force and to take and destroy any vessels which might be found presuming to urge a commerce in that quarter.* Immediately after the decision, a company was formed at Seville to prosecute the trade which had received so high and solemn a sanction, and Cabot was solicited to take the com mand, f One of the parties to the association was Robert Thome of Bristol, then resident in Spain, who with his part ner was led into the adventure, " principally," as he says, " for that two English friends of mine, which are somewhat learned in cosmographie, should go in the same ships to bring me certain relation of the country, and to be expert in the navigation of those seas.f In September, 1524, Cabot re ceived from the council of the Indies permission to engage in the enterprise, and he proceeded to give bond to the Com pany for the faithful execution of his trust. His original request was, that four ships properly armed and equipped should be provided at the expense of the Treasury, while the Company on its part should supply the requisite funds for the commercial objects. || The agreement with the emperor was executed at Madrid on 4th March, 1525, H and stipulated that a squadron of, at least, three vessels of not less than one hun dred tons should be furnished, and one hundred and fifty men.** The title of Captain General was conferred on Ca bot The emperor was to receive from the Company four thousand ducats and a share of the profits. It was proposed, instead of pushing directly across the Pa- * Peter Martyr, Dec. vi. cap. x. f Herrera, Dec. iii. lib. ix. cap. iii. * Hakluyt, vol. i. p. 215. We may conjecture one of these to bare been Jorge Barlo (George Barlow), who, with another, brought to Spain Cabot's Despatch from the La Plata (Herrera, Dec. iv. lib. iii. cap. L). Peter Martyr, Dec. vii. cap. vi. | Ib. 1 Herrera, Dec. iil lib. ix. cap. iii. ** Peter Martyr, Dec. vii. cap. vi. Herrera, 'Dec. iii. lib. ix. cap. iii. Gomara says two hundred and fifty, but his assertion has no weight against the concurring testimony of the two Historians cited, one a member of the Council, and the other referring to official document Q 122 cific, after penetrating through the Strait, as Magellan had done, to proceed deliberately and explore on every side, par ticularly the western coast of the Continent.* The arrangement at first was, that the expedition should sail in August, 1525;f hut it was delayed by circumstances to which it may be proper now to advert as bearing on its ulti mate fate. * Peter Martyr, Dec. yii. cap. vi fib. 123 CHAP. XVII. JEALOUSY OF THE CONTEMPLATED EXPEDITION ON THE PART OF PORTU GAL MISSION OF DIEGO GARCIA, A PORTUGUESE. IN order to understand fully the circumstances which con spired to throw vexatious obstacles in the way of the expe dition, and in the end to defeat its main object, we must go back to the voyage of Magellan that first opened to Spain a direct communication with those regions of which Portugal had before monopolised the lucrative commerce. No sooner did the project of that intrepid navigator be come known in Portugal than the utmost alarm was excited. Remonstrances were addressed to the government of Spain; threats and entreaties were alternately used to terrify or to soothe the navigator himself, and assassination was openly spoken of as not unmerited by so nefarious a purpose. Find ing these efforts vain, a tone of bitter derision was adopted. The Portuguese said, that the king of Castile was incurring an idle expense, inasmuch as Magellan was an empty boaster, without the least solidity of character, who would never ac complish what he had undertaken."* Had Magellan perished a month earlier than he did, these contemptuous sneers would have passed into history as de scriptive of his real character. There is every reason to be lieve, that he fell a victim to the treachery infused into the expedition ; and the pilot, Estevan Gomez, who openly urged retreat after a considerable progress had been made in the * Decian los Portugueses que el Rei de Castilla perderia el gasto porque Her- nando de Magallanes era hombre hablador, i de poca substancia, i que no saldria con lo que prometia." Herrera, Dec. li. lib. iv. cap. x. 124 Strait, was, we know, a Portuguese.* The conduct of the Portuguese authorities to the surviving vessels was marked by cruelty and rapacity,; and even the gentle spirit of Peter Martyr breathes indignation. Official notice was received that the ship Trinity had been captured and plundered by the Portuguese, and that this had been followed up by their going to the Moluccas, taking possession of them, and seizing property of every description. "The Pilots and King's servants who are safely returned, say that both robbe ries and pillage exceed the value of two hundred thousand ducats, but Christo- phorus de Haro especially) the General director of this aromatical negotiation, under the name of Factor, confirmeth the same. Our senate yieldeth great credit to this man. He gave me the names of all the five ships that accompanied the Victory, and of all the Mariners, and mean Officers whatsoever. And in our senate assembled he showed why he assigned that value of the booty or prey, because he particularly declared how much spices the Trinity brought. "It may be doubted what Caesar will do in such a case. I think he will dissem ble the matter for a while, by reason of the renewed affinity, yet though they were twins of one birth, it were hard to suffer this injurious loss to pass unpun ished."! In reference to the voyage of Cabot, the alarm of the Por- guese would seem to have been yet more serious ; for they saw in it not a doubtful experiment, but a well concerted com mercial enterprise. The emperor was besieged with impor tunities ; the King of Portugal representing that it would be " the utter destruction of his poor kingdom," to have his mo nopoly of this trade invaded.f The honest historian is per suaded, that though a tie of consanguinity existed between the two monarchs by their common descent from Ferdinand and Isabella, and though the Emperor had given his sister Catherine, ' < a most delicate young lady of seventeen," in mar riage to the King of Portugal, a step "so injurious to the kingdom of Castile, the chief sinews of his power," as the arrest of the expedition, would not be taken. So far as * Herrera, Dec. ii. lib. ix. cap. xv. Purchas, vol. i. B. i. ch- ii. f Peter Martyr, Dec. viii. cap. x. | Peter Martyr, Dec. vii. cap. vii. . Peter Martyr, Deci. vii. cap. vii. 125 > endearing domestic ties could influence such a matter, the apprehension here implied was to be yet further increased. A negotiation was going on for the Emperor's marriage to Isabella, the sister of the King of Portugal, and the ceremony took place in March, 1526. The dowry received was nine hundred thousand crowns, and rumours, in the course of the treaty, were current that one of the articles of the double alliance stipulated an abandonment of the Moluccas. Passing onward with the subject, it may be stated that early in 1529 the emperor relieved himself from all difficulty by mortga ging the Moluccas to the King of Portugal for three hundred and fifty thousand ducats, with the right of exclusive trade until redemption.* This step excited the utmost disgust in Spain, and it was openly said that he had better have mort gaged Estremadura itself. He would listen, however, to no representations on the subject. A proposition having been made to pay off the mortgage money, on condition that the applicants should have six years enjoyment of the trade, the Emperor, then in Flanders, not only rejected the offer, but sent a message of rebuke to the council for having entertained it. Aside from private feelings, he doubtless, as a politician, thought it unwise to put in peril an alliance so intimate and assured for any commercial purpose unconnected with the schemes of ambition by which he was engrossed. Matters, however, had not reached this crisis before Cabot sailed ; and the intense anxiety of Portugal could, therefore, look only to the indirect efforts at frustration, for which the intimate relations of the two countries might afford opportu nities. In all the accounts of Cabot's enterprise given by the Span ish historians, reference is found to an expedition under the command of a Portuguese,! named Diego Garcia, which left Spain shortly after Cabot; touched at the Canaries, as he had *_Herrera, Dec. iv. lib.v. cap. t Herrera, Dec. iii. lib. x. cap. 126 done; found its way to the La Pldta; fixed itself in his neigh bourhood ; and, finally, by the misconduct of certain persons connected with it, brought on a general and overwhelming attack on Cabot, from the natives, who had previously, by a mixture of boldness and good management, been brought into alliance with him. Charlevoix (Histoire du Paraguay, torn. i. p. 28) supposes that Garcia was employed avowedly by Portugal ; but according to Herrera (Dec. iii. lib. x. cap. i.), the expedition was fitted out by the Count D. Fernando de Andrada and others, for the La Plata, and consisted of a ship of one hundred tons, a pinnace, and one brigantine, with the frame of another to be put together as occasion might require. One great object was to search for Juan de Cartagena, and the French priest whom Magellan had put on shore. Garcia left Cape Finisterre on the 5th of August, 1526, and touching at the Canaries (where Cabot had been) took in supplies and sailed thence the 1st of September. These plain matters of fact have been recently mis-stated. In Dr Lardner's Cyclopaedia (History of Maritime and Inland discovery, vol. ii. p. 89), it is said, "Diego Garcia was sent with a single ship to the river of Solis ; but as he lingered on his way at the Canary Islands, he was anticipated in his dis coveries by Sebastian Cabot. That celebrated Navigator had sailed from Spain a few months later than Garcia," &c. Cabot sailed in April 1526. The fact is important, because had he left Spain under the circumstances stated, he could not have been ignorant of the claim of Garcia, under a grantj as is alleged, from the emperor, and his going to the same quarter would have been both fraudulent and absurd. His manifest ignorance on the subject corroborates the suspicion that, on finding the intrigues to arrest Cabot ineffectual, this expedition, under the command of the Portuguese, was hastily got up to watch his movements, and probably to act in con cert with the disaffected, with an understanding as to certain points of rendezvous in case the mutineers should gain the mastery. It is important to note that in Peter Martyr, whose 127 work embraces the early part of 1526,* no reference b made to any projected expedition to the quarter for which, as it is now said, Garcia was destined. At Decade iv. lib. i. cap* i. Herrera resumes his abstract of Garcia's report. That personage is now off the coast of Brasil. He touched at the Bay of St Vincent, and there found a Portuguese of the degree of Bachelor, from whom he received refreshments, and whose- son- in- law agreed to accom pany him to the La Plata. In, running down the coast he touched at the island of Patos (now St Catherine) in 27, where Cabot had been before him, and, as Garcia asserts, had behaved in a very shameful manner, carrying off the sons of several chiefs who had treated him with great kindness. Pro ceeding up the La Plata, Garcia found the ships which Cabot, oh ascending the river, had left under the charge of an offi cer. He resolved to follow in his brigantine ; and here we are let into the character of this personage. While at St Vincent, he had hired, to his host the Bachelor, the ship of a hundred tons, to carry eight hundred slaves to Portugal ; and " to colour," says Herrera, "his covetousness, he said, that he had protested to the Count Don Fernando de Andrada, that the vessel was useless, being much too large for the naviga tion and discovery of the La Plata."f Thus, with the blind ness of an absurd prejudice, has the author consented to spread upon his pages all the malignant invective of this man against Cabot to make it a part of the History of the Indies and yet he winds up, at last, by telling us of Garcia's fraud, and of the falsehood by which it was sought to be disguised ! The Portuguese, in order to break the force of indignation against himself, evidently laboured to turn the resentment of his employers on Cabot, by whom they supposed their views * He speaks of the marriage of the Emperor with the sister of the King of Portugal, which took place in March, 1526. f " Para dar color a esta codicia, dixO que havia protestado al Conde Don Fer nando de Andrada que no le diese esta nave porque era mui grande e inutil para la navegacion i descubrimiento del Rio de la Plata." Herrera, Dec. iv lib. i. cap. i. 128 to have been thwarted. One reflection is obvious. If this man could be seduced from his duty by the Portuguese Bachelor, we may presume that the agents of Portugal had no great difficulty in negotiating with him and inducing him to give his voyage a turn to suit their purposes. Even sup posing his employers, then, honest and sincere, we have no assurance that he did not act from sinister motives. We shall meet Garcia again in the La Plata. There is another circumstance, somewhat posterior in point of time, but which serves to show the anxious expedients to which Portugal did not disdain to resort, even at the expense of its dignity. A Portuguese, named Acosta, returned with Cabot from Brazil, and immediately afterwards the king of Portugal was detected in an unworthy correspondence with him.* It is remarkable, also, that the complaints of the mu tineers whom Cabot put ashore were brought to Spain by a Portuguese vessel.f * Herrera, Dec. iv. lib. x. cap. yi. f - Ib. Dec. iy. lib. iii. cap. i. 129 CHAP. XVIII. INTERFERENCE WITH THE ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE VOYAGE MENDEZ APPOINTED SECOND IN COMMAND CONTRARY, TO THE -WISHES OF CABOT DE ROJAS THE SEALED ORDERS PREJUDICES OF THE SPANISH HIS TORIANS EXPEDITION SAILS. IN a letter dated November, 1525, Peter Martyr * speaks of the expedition as at length about to sail. It was doomed, however, to yet further delays ; and even in matters of detail the presence of an evil spirit is but too obvious. Three ships were provided by the Emperor, to which a small caravel was added by an individual.! The principal authority over the arrangements would seem to have been ex ercised by certain agents or deputies (disputados) named by the freighters. They controlled Cabot, in every particular ; and it is obvious, therefore, that the fate of the expedition lay in their integrity or corruptibility. The whole sum which the company had at stake is stated to have been only ten thou sand ducats. The leading subject of difference between Cabot and these persons, as appears by the meagre accounts left to us, was as to the person who should fill the office of Lieutenant-General. Cabot was anxious for the appointment of his friend De Rufis; but the choice of the agents fell on Martin Mendez who had been in one of Magellan's ships as Treasurer (contador), a sit uation bearing, it may be presumed, an analogy to the present office of Purser. They are said to have made the selection on * Decade viii. cap. he. f Such is the account of Herrera, confirmed by Robert Thome. Writers who make a different statement (Charlevoix, for example, in his Histoire du Paraguay torn. i. p. 25) have been misled by looking to the original requisition of Cabot instead of the limited force finally placed under his command. R 130 account of their differences with Cabot.* These disputes rose to such a height that the Emperor was urged to appoint another commander. .When it is stated that this same Martin Mendez was one of those expelled from the squadron, for mu tiny, by Cabot who afterwards justified himself to the Empe ror for having done so, we not only see the irksome position in which he was placed, but will, probably, deem the efforts to get rid of him the highest compliment to his energy and incorruptibility. A hollow compromise was at length effected by a provision, on paper, that Mendez should take part in nothing which was not expressly committed to him by Cabot, and never act except in the absence or disability of the chief.f Thus, with regard to an officer to whom the commander should be able to look, at every turn, for confidential counsel and cordial co-operation, the utmost that Cabot could procure was a stipulation that he should preserve a sullen indifference, and not be actively mischievous. A number of young men of family, animated by the love of adventure, joined the Expedition, and amongst them three brothers of Balboa. There are two personages destined to act, with Mendez, a conspicuous part, and who may therefore be here mentioned. The first was Miguel de Rodas, a sort of supernumerary, to whom no particular post was assigned, but who is stated to have been a man of great valour and nautical experience, and to have enjoyed the favour of the emperor. J The other was Francisco de Rojas, captain of one of the ships, the Trinidad. Though a slight difference is perceptible in the names, they would seem to have been brothers, for, at a subsequent period, in speaking of the leading conspirators, these two are describ- * " Los disputados de los armadores por diferencias que con el General avian lenido quisieron que fuesse Martin Mendez y no Miguel de Rufis dquien pretendia llevar eneste cargo Sebastian Gaboto." Herrera, Dec. iii. lib. ix. cap. iii. f "Que no se occupasse sino en las cosas que el General le cometiese, y estando ausente o impedido, y no de otra manera porque le llevaba contra su voluntad. " Herrera, Dec. iii. lib. ix. cap iii. \ Herrera, Dec. iii. lib. ix. cap. iii. Herrera, Dec. iv. lib. i. cap i. 131 ed, with a yet further variation, as " los dos hermanos Roxas i Martin Mendez" ("the two brothers Roxas and Martin Mendez"). The most extraordinary part, however, of the arrangement, consisted of the Sealed Orders, of which a copy was given to each vessel.* We are not informed at what time they were to be opened, but from the nature of their contents we may infer that it was to be done immediately on getting to sea, and from the sequel we may infer how idle would have been any inj unction of forbearance. Provision was therein made for the death of Cabot, and eleven persons were named on whom, in succession, the command in chief was to devolve. Should this list be exhausted, a choice was to be made by general vote throughout the squadron, and in case of an equality of suf frages the candidates were to decide between themselves by casting lots ! At the head of the list are found the three in dividuals just mentioned. It is remarkable that Gregario Caro, the captain of one of the ships and who is afterwards found in command of the fort in the La Plata when Cabot as cended further up the river, stands. last oji this list, after all the treasurers and accountants. This person is subsequently statedf to have been a nephew of the Bishop of Canaria, and seems to have acted throughout with integrity. It would be difficult to imagine a scheme better calculated to nourish disaffection. Each individual of note found a pro vision by which he might be brought into the chief command, and was invited to calculate the chances of its reaching him through the successive disappearance of his predecessors on the list ; and the crews, while under the pressure of severe discipline, not only saw a hope of bettering their condition by a change, but at each step approached nearer to the clause which placed the supreme power in their own gift. A con tingency thus provided for they knew must have been deemed, at home, within the range of possible occurrences, and they * Jlerrera, Dec. iii. lib. ix. cap. iii. f Ib. Dec. IT. lib. i. cap. i. 132 would have little disposition to let the precaution be found a superfluous one. While there exist so many causes for misunderstanding Cabot's conduct, and motives for misrepresenting it, the wri ter, unfortunately, whose statements have since been adopted almost without question, prepared his history under circum stances little inclining him to impartiality. The Decades of Peter Martyr terminate before the sailing of the expedition, and the venerable author complains, at the close, of the in firmities which then pressed on him in his seventieth year* The next work that of Gomara appeared in 1552, shortly after Cabot had abandoned the service of Spain, and returned to his native country. Charles V., in 1549, had made a for mal, but ineffectual, demand on Edward VI. for his return.* That Gomara had his eye on him in this new and invidious position is evident, because in speaking of the conference at Badajos he incidentally mentions Cabot as one of the few sur vivors of those who had been present on that occasion (cap. C.). In a work, therefore, dedicated to the Emperor, we are not to look for a vindication of our navigator from the calum nies which might be current to his disadvantage; and we find, accordingly, every allusion to him deeply tinctured with pre judice. The mutineers, of whom a severe example was made, had enjoyed a high reputation at home, and were doubtless able to raise a clamorous party. Those who fitted out the expedition of Garcia, were led to TOgard Cabot invidiously, and when it is added that the mercantile loss of his own em ployers would unavoidably lead, on the part of some, to re proachful criticism, however unmerited, we see at once that his reputation lay at the mercy of a writer ready and eager to embody the suggestions of disappointment or malevolence. But our patience is exhausted by the long detention of the expedition. It sailed at length in the beginning of April, 1526.t * Strype's Memorials of the Reformation, vol. ii. p. 190. t Gomara, cap. Ixxxix. Hen-eta, Dec, iii. lib. i* cap. ;iii. Robert Thome (1 Hakluyt, p. 215) There has been a- general misconception on this point in 133 English compilations, attributable, probably, to the wretched version of Herrera by Stevens, which names April 1525 (Stevens' Translation, vol. iii. p. 380), in defiance of the work it professes to translate. The same mistake is found in Campbell's Lives of the Admirals, and the source of the author's error becomes manifest by his incautious citation of Herrera. The reference given is totally in applicable to the original \rork, but corresponds exactly with the new and arbi trary distribution of Decades, books, and chapters by Stevens. In most recent works the date is mis-stated, amongst the rest by Mr Southey (History of Brasil, p. 52), and by the Quarterly Review (vol. iv. p. 459). The former writer, speak* ing of this voyage in 1526, infers from Cabot's being called Pilot-Major, that AmericusVespucius who had held that office was "probably" then dead (p. 52), a singular remark, as it is well known that Vespucias died fifteen years before. He was succeeded, as we have seen, by Juan Dias de Soils. Cabot's appoint ment as Pilot-Major in 1518, his attendance at Badajos, &c., are altogether un noticed in the pretended translation of Stevens ! 134 CHAP. XIX. COMPLAINTS IN THE SQUADRONSPRETENDED CAUSES OF DISSATISFACTION MUTINY QUELLED BY THE ENERGY OF CABOT HAPPY RESULTS* HIS CONDUCT JUSTIFIED TO THE EMPEROR RIDICULOUS CHARGES SUG GESTED BY THE PORTUGUESE, DIEGO GARCIA. WE look for an explosion as the vessels quit the shore. It would seem, however, that the train was prepared to burn more slowly. The Squadron is seen to move on steadily and in silence, but beneath the fair and smiling canvass we know there is dark treachery. In attempting to pierce the obscurity which veils the scenes that follow, and to place, ourselves by the side of Cabot, we nave unfortunately to rely on those whose very purpose is disparagement. Yet to that quarter we do not fear to turn, and have at least an assurance that we shall find whatever the most malignant industry could collect. Something is said by Herrera as to a scarcity of provi sions, owing, as far as he will speak out, to their injudicious distribution amongst the vessels. Now it is quite inconceiv able that in an expedition prepared for the circumnavigation of the globe there should have been found this deficiency on the coast of Brasil, and the fact, moreover, would be disgrace ful to the commanders of the other vessels, and to the agents at home. It is obvious that while nothing is more unlikely than such improvidence on the part of Cabot, it would be easy for disaffected officers to circulate amongst the men complaints of scarcity, and thus refer the odium of a limited allowance to the Commander-in-Chief. We hear, also, that he did not take sufficient pains to soothe the angry feelings which had been excited at Seville.* Then The whole passage has that wr of vagueness so characteristic of falsehood. 135 it seems that dissatisfaction arose not from any thing occurring during the voyage, but from continued brooding over antece dent griefs. Doubtless, Martin Mendez, of whose unfitness Cabot had made a representation, and against whose mischiev ous intermeddling he had been forced to obtain a stipulation, was in no very complacent mood, even if we put out of view the probability of his having been tampered with by the Por tuguese. The complaint, too, that Cabot did not sufficiently exert himself to make others forget the late angry discussions, comes from the very persons who broke out into open mutiny, and whose statements, embittered by a recollection of the se vere punishment inflicted on them, compose our evidence. It might be superfluous to add a word to this explanation, yet the remark cannot be forborne, that if there be one trait in the character of Cabot more clearly established than another, it is the remarkable gentleness of his deportment; and in every reference to him, by those who had enjoyed a personal inter course, there breaks forth some endearing form of expression that marks affectionate attachment. But pretexts will never be wanting where a mutinous tem per exists. The squadron was running down the coast of Brasil when it seems to have been thought netfessary to bring matters to a crisis. Murmurs became general and vehement. The Lieutenant-General Mendez, De Rojas, and De Rodas were louder than the rest in blaming the government of Ca bot.* In a word, relying on the clamour they had raised, it is plain that these men now broke out into open insolence, pre suming that disaffection would thus reach its height, and a new arrangement take place conformably to the indication of the Sealed Orders. The situation of Cabot would to one of ordinary stamp have "Porque le falt6 la victualla por ser mal repartida y como por las diferencias de Sevilla, iban algunos animos mal satisfechos y el tuvo poco cuydado en sossegarlos nacieron murmuraciones y atrevimientos en el armada." Herrera, Dec. iii. lib. ix. cap. iii. * " Teniente de General, Martin Mendez, al Capitan Francisco de Rojas y a Miguel de Rodas porque demas que les tenia mala voluntad, con libertad repre- hendian su govierno." Herrera, Dec. iii. lib. ix. cap. iii.) 136 been appalling. The three persons highest in authority, and to whom he ought to have been able to look for support at such a crisis, had artfully, and in concert, fomented discontent, and were now ready to place themselves at its head. He was in the midst of those who disliked and undervalued him as a foreigner. There were but two of his own countrymen on board. De Rojas, he might anticipate, had made sure of his own crew of the Trinidad, and De Rodas, a man of varied service and high reputation, was likely to rally round him the confidence and enthusiasm of the spirited young cavaliers, volunteers in the expedition. Cabot had performed no mem orable service for Spain. There now comes over us, too, almost with dismay, what before had scarcely excited atten tion. The Spaniards, Peter Martyr said, denied that Cabot had achieved what he pretended, even in the service of Eng land. Such an insinuation could not have escaped the eager malevolence of those now around him. Here then was ex ercised, harshly and haughtily, over Castilians, an authority yielded, incautiously, to the adroit falsehoods of the English adventurer ! But Cabot belonged to that rare class of men whose powers unfold at trying moments. There seems to belong to com mand on the Ocean a peculiar energy, the offspring of incess ant peril and of that very insolation which throws the brave man on himself, and leads him to muse habitually over all the exigences that may, on a sudden, task to the uttermost his fortitude or his intrepidity. Cabot saw that his only safety lay in extreme boldness. He was no longer, as with Sir Thomas Pert, a mere guide in the career of discovery. A high responsibility was on him. He knew that by a daring exercise of that rightful authority, to which habit lends a moral influence, men may be awed into passive instruments, who, but the moment before, meditated fierce mutiny. His deter mination was instantly made, and well justified that reputation for dauntless resolution borne back to Spain and to England from this expedition. He seized De Rojas took him out of his ship the Trinidad and placing him with Mendez and de 137 Rodas in a boat, ordered the three to be put on shore. The scene was one of deep humiliation ; and these men long after wards are found dwelling with bitterness on the indignity, in their memorial to the Emperor.* The effect was instant. Discord vanished with this knot of conspirators. During the five years of service through which the expedition passed, full as they were of toil, privation-, and peril, we hear not the slightest murmur; on the contrary, every thing indicates the most harmonious action and the most devoted fidelity. Curiosity runs eagerly forward to learn the view taken by the Emperor of this high-handed measure. It can only be inferred from circumstances, for there is no account of any formal trial. That a thorough investigation took place cannot be doubted. Miguel de Rodas had been in the Victory, the ship of Magellan's squadron which effected the circumnavi gation of the globe, had received from* the Emperor a large pension for life, and a device for his Coat of Arms, commemo rative of that achievement.! Martin Mendez had been in the same ship, and the device prepared for him is of a yet more flattering description. J It was doubtless found, with out going into the question of Portuguese bribery, that their accidental association with so memorable an enterprise, had given to them a reputation quite beyond their merit, and that these very marks of distinction, and a certain feeling as vete^ rans, had led to an insolent assumption which rendered it in dispensable for Cabot to vindicate the ascendancy due to his station and to his genius. By a Portuguese vessel the three mutineers gave notice of their situation, and complained in the bitterest terms of the conduct of Cabot. The Emperor sent orders to have them conveyed to Spain in order that justice might be done. Hernando Calderon and Jorge Barlo despatched by Cabot, afterwards reached Toledo, and made re- * " Con tanta afrenta suia." Herrera, Dec. iv. lib. Hi. cap. i. f Herrera, Dec. iii. lib. iv. cap. xiv. i Ibid. Herrera, Dec. iv. lib. iii. cap. i. s. 138 port of all that had taken place* The emperor yielded to the solicitations of Cabot for succour and permission to colonise the country (Herrera, Dec. iv.lib. iii. cap. 5.), and the merchant adventurers declining to co operate in what had ceased to be a mercantile speculation, the Emperor undertook to bear the whole expense himself (Dec. iv. lib. viii. cap. xi.). As we never hear of any censure on Cabot, and know that he after wards resumed his high and honourable office in Spain; and that when, long after, he went to England, the Emperor ear nestly solicited his return, we cannot doubt that his vindica tion was complete. A singular proof here occurs of the disingenuousness of the Spanish historians. It is manifest, that Cabot could not have escaped the sharpest rebuke, and punishment, without making out a clear justification of his conduct ; yet, while not a syllable is given of his statement, which must, from the result, have triumphed, all the disparaging suggestions that malignity could invent, and the falsehood of which must have been established at the time, are eagerly detailed. There can only be wrung from Gomara a cold acknowledgement that the voyage was frustrated, " not so much, as some say, by his fault, as by that of his associates."* It might be superfluous, under such circumstances, 10 ex amine these allegations, yet they are on their face so improba ble, that we may safely advert to them, even in the absence of Cabot's Defence, It is asserted, that at the island of Patos (the present St Catherine's), where he was treated with the utmost kindness by the inhabitants, and took in refreshments, he basely seized the sons of some of the principal chiefs and carried them forcibly away. This story is taken from the report of the Portuguese, Diego Garcia, who, although denounced for fraud on his own employers, is considered a good witness against Cabot. He represents himself to have subsequently visited * " No tanto, a lo que algunos dicen, por su culpa como por la de su gente. Gomarn, cap. Ixxxix. 139 the island, and to have been very graciously received, not withstanding the recent outrage. This last circumstance is not the least of the improbabilities involved in his tale, for putting that out of view, as well as the polluted source from which the charge proceeds, let us consider its claims to credit. The seizure is represented to have taken place not on the return, but on the outward voyage. What, then, was the object of so wanton a piece of cruelty ? But further, the orders of the Council of the Indies were peremptory that no violence should be used. Peter Martyr (Dec. viii. cap. x.), speaking of the expedition of Gomez in 1524, adverts with indignation to his having brought away a number of natives, and expressly states it to be in violation of the standing orders of the Council. Now, Cabot had been, as early as 1515, a member of that Council, was familiar with the orders, and instrumental in framing them. He was in Spain when Go mez returned, and knew of the indignation excited by the abduction. Is it at all likely, then, that he would subject himself to a similar rebuke without any conceivable motive? It is remarkable, that in Cabot's own instructions to Sir Hugh Willoughby, long afterwards, we recognise the analogy to those of the Council of the Indies, for while he enjoins every effort, by gentleness, to get a thorough knowledge of the natives, he expressly forbids the use of " violence or force" (. 23 of Instructions, Hakluyt, vol. i. p. 228). We must advert again, more particularly, to the indigna tion which, in 1524, Peter Martyr expresses at the conduct of Gomez. " Contrary to the laws made by us, that no violence should be offered to any nation, he freighted his ship with people of both sexes taken from certain innocent half-naked nations, who contented themselves with hovels instead of houses."* It is with this historian that Cabot is found on terms of inti- * " Contra Leges a nobis dictatas ne quis ulli gentium vim afferat, ab innoc- cutibus quibusdam seminudis popults magalibus pro domibus contentis," &c. (Dec. viii. cap. x.) 140 macy more than ten years before, and the good old man speaks of him as one of a congenial temper, or as Eden and Hakluyt have it, " Cabot is my very friend Whom I use familiarly and delight to have him sometimes keep me company in my own house." At the moment of his penning the denunciation of Gomez, Cabot was his associate with the ripened friendship of the intermediate years. Yet Mr Southey (History of Brazil, p. 52) has not only consented to echo the calumny of a vile Portuguese convicted of fraud and falsehood, but adds this coarse and cruel invective " Cabot touched at an island on the coast called Ilhados Patos, or Duck Island, and there took in supplies ; requiting the good will which the natives had manifested with the usual villainy of an old discoverer, by forcibly carrying away four of them." And the same writer (ib.) denounces, as "an act of cruelty," the energetic pro ceeding by which Cabot .quelled the mutiny, and probably 'saved his own life. Another item of criticism is derived from the report of the same Portuguese, Diego Garcia. He sailed from the Cana ries on the first September, and before he reaches the Cape de Verd Islands a boast is uttered of his superior skill in the choice of a route. So earnest is the wish to make this im pression, that we are again told he proceeded from the Cape de Verds "for Cape St Augustine [on the coast of Brazil], which he places in eight degrees ten minutes of Southern latitude, and this route, on account of the great currents from the rivers of Guinea, which drive the ships to the North- West, is perilous, and Sebastian Cabot did not know how to take advantage of it (as has been already said), because though he was a great Cosmographer, he was not so great a Sea man."* "Fue en demanda del Cabo de San Augustin, que este Piloto pone en ocho Grades, i unsesmo de Grado de la Vanda del Sur, de la otra parte de la Equinoc. tial. Y este Camino, por la grandes corrientes que salen de los Rios de Guinea, que baten los Navios a la Vanda del Norueste es peligroso ni le supO tomar Se bastian Gaboto (como se ha dicho) porque aunque era gran Cosmogi-afo, no era tan gran Marinero." Herrera, Dec. iii. lib. x- cap. i. 141 Now first as to the facts. Garcia's criticism seems to be that Cabot stood across the Atlantic before he got as far South as the Cape de Verd Islands. That this very point had been the subject of anxious deliberation we learn from Peter Mar tyr, (Dec. vii. cap. vi.) " Cabot will set oif in the next month of August, 1525. He departs no earlier, because things ne cessary for an enterprise of such importance cannot be pre pared, nor by the course of the heavens ought he to begin his voyage before that time ; as he has to direct his course towards the Equinoctial when the sun," &c.* It might be supposed, perhaps, that the vexatious delays had caused some change of the route originally projected ; but so far is this from the fact, Herrera tells us expressly " After many difficulties Sebastian Cabot departed in the beginning of April of this year (1526), &c. He sailed to the Canaries and the Cape de Verd Islands, and thence to Cape St Augustine," &c.f Thus he took the very route in which Garcia followed! Even supposing Herrera to be mistaken, and to have describ ed the course originally resolved on at Seville, instead of that which Cabot actually pursued, the latter would only be found, in avoiding the Cape de Verds, opening a path which is more generally followed in modern times. Take it either way, the impudence and absurdity of the cavil are palpable. Yet note the manner in which an English writer of reputation has caught it up.J " Cabot's conduct in this voyage did not give satisfaction, and was thought unequal to the high reputation, he had ac- * " Est Cabotus, Augusto mense proximo anni MDXXV. discessurus, nee citiusi quidem quia nee prius queunt ad rem tantum necessaria parari nee per coelorum cursus debet prius illud iter inchoari ; oportet quippe tune versus Equinoctium vela dirigere quando Sol," &c. t "Despues de muchas dificultades partio Sebastian Gaboto a los primeros de Abril de este ano (1526), &c. Fue navegando a las Canarias y a las Islas de Cabo Verde, y despues al Cabo de San Agustin." Herrera, Dec. iii. lib. ix. cap. iii. 4= ' A Chronological History of the Discoveries in the South Sea or Pacific Ocean, &c. By James Burney, Captain in the Royal Navy," vol. i. p. 162. 142 quired. The Spanish writers say of him (!), that he was a better cosmographer than a mariner or commander." Wearied as the reader may be, we must advert to another sneer of this Portuguese. In ascending the La Plata, Cabot proceeded with deliberation, examining carefully the country, and opening a communication with the different tribes on its banks. This was of course a work of time as well as of labour and peril. When Garcia arrived, he proceeded hastily up the river, and boasts that "in 26 days he advanced as far as Sebastian Cabot had done in many months."* The folly of this idle vaunt has not deterred Herrera from making it a part of the History of the Indies 5 and it has found a ready place with English writers. We might, indeed, be almost led to believe in a concerted plan, on the part of his countrymen, to defame this great nav igator, were not the causes of misconception obvious. To some the perfidious translation of Stevens has proved a snare, and the few who proceeded further have been led, by an im perfect knowledge of the language, to catch at certain leading words and phrases, readily intelligible, and thus to present them apart from the context, which, in the original, renders the calumny harmless and even ridiculous. * Herrera, Dec. iv. lib. i. cap. i. 143 CHAP. XX. CABOT ENTERS THE LA PLATA NECESSITY FOR CAUTION HIS PREDE CESSOR AS PILOT-MAJOR KILLED IN ATTEMPTING TO EXPLORE THAT RIVER CARRIES THE ISLAND OF ST GABRIEL HIS PROGRESS TO ST SALVADOR WHERE A FORT IS ERECTED ITS POSITION LOSS IN TAKING POSSESSION. CABOT was left in the neighbourhood of the La Plata at the moment when, by a determined effort, he "shook to air" the m'utiny that sought to fasten on him. It is plain, that after expelling the three individuals who, in the event of his death,, were named, in succession, to the command in chief, he would not have been justified in pro ceeding, with the squadron which the Emperor had confided to him, on the long and perilous voyage originally contem plated. He determined, therefore, to put into the La Plata and send advice of what had occurred. His predecessor in the office of Pilot-Major, Diego de Solis, had been slain in attempting to explore this river; Cabot now resolved to renew the experiment. An additional reason for postponing, until further orders, the prosecution of the enterprise was the loss, by shipwreck, of one of the vessels. This fact is mentioned by Richard Eden (Decades, fol. 316), who has a chapter on the region of the La Plata in which he adverts to the expedition, in terms* that bespeak the reports conveyed to England, prob ably, by Robert Thorne, then at Seville, and his two friends who were engaged in it. He states the loss of the vessel, and * "The Emperoure's Majestic and Kynge of Spayne Charles the fifte, sente forthe Sebastian Cabot (a man of great courage and skylfull in Cosmographie, and of no lesse experience as concernynge the starres and the sea) with command ment," Sec. 144 that "the men that saved their lyves by swymmynge were receaved into the other shyppes." It is the more necessary to understand the considerations by which Cabot was influenced, as in a recent work (Dr Lard- ner's Cyclopaedia, History of Maritime and Inland Discovery? vol. ii. p. 89), the following strange assertion is found amidst a tissue of errors: "On touching at the mouth of the river in which Solis had lost his life, Cabot found two Spaniards who had deserted from that Commander, besides fifteen other stragglers from subsequent expeditions. All these men con curred in representing the country up the river as singularly rich in the precious metals, and easily persuaded Cabot to proceed in that direction !" Not the slightest allusion is made to the mutiny, or to the loss of one of the vessels. Thus, an Officer in command of the Emperor's squadron with specific orders, and under bond, moreover, to the merchants of Se ville, is represented as abandoning his duty and becoming an easy dupe to the idle stories of some runaways! At this point we have again to deplore the loss of Cabot's Maps. One of them described his course up the La Plata, and would seem to have been made public, for Eden (Decades, fol. 316) says, " From the mouth of the river, Cabot sayled up the same into the lande for the space of three huwlreth and fiftie leagues, as he wryteth in his own Carde" This statement is the more important, as the extent of his progress has been singularly misrepresented. In the Conversation reported by Ramusio, and usually con nected with the name of Butrigarius the Pope's legate, Ca bot is made to say that he sailed up the La Plata more than six hundred leagues.* This is the passage, it may be remember ed, which the Biographic Universelle could not find in Ra musio. Eden correctly translates it (Decades, fol. 255), but Hakluyt, who adopts his version with anxious servility up to this point, has "more than six score leagues!" (vol. iii. p. 7) thus furnishing a new proof of his utter faithlessness. The * " Et andai all* insu per quello piu de secento leghe." Kamusio, torn. i. fol. 415. 145 exaggeration of the original, as honestly given by Eden, pre pares us for Ramusio's remark, to which reference has already been made, that he could not pretend to trust his memory about the exact terms of the Conversation. Hakluyt, by an arbitrary and absurd reduction, not only obscures this pre sumptive evidence of general error, but leads us to infer as such matters are usually over-rated that, in point of fact, Cabot did not proceed so far. It will appear, presently, that there was no exaggeration in the statement of the "Card." The career on which Cabot was now entering demanded circumspection as well as courage. De Solis with a party of fifty men had been fiercely assailed and cut off, the bodies of himself and his companions devoured by the ferocious natives, and the survivors of the expedition, who witnessed the scene from the ships, had left the river in dismay, and returned to Spain with the horrid news.* In accompanying Cabot we take Herrera as our principal guide (Dec. iii. lib. ix. cap. iii.). Running boldly up the river, which is to this day the dread of navigators, he reached a small island about half a league from the Northern shore, nearly opposite the present Buenos Ayres, and gave to it the name of Gabriel, which it yet bears. It is a short distance from Martin Gareia's island, so called after the Pilot of De Solis who was buried there (Eden's Decades, fol. 316). The natives had collected and made a very formidable show of resistance, but Cabot, ac cording to Eden, " without respect of peril, thought best to expugneitby one meanesor other, wherein his boldness tooke good effecte as oftentymes chaunceth in great afFayres^ (Eden, fol. 316). At this island Cabot left his ships, and proceeding seven leagues further in boats, reached a river to which he gave the name of St Salvador. As it offered a safe and commodious harbour, he returned and brought up the ships, but was * Herrera, Dec. ii. lib. i. .cap. vii. Peter Martyr, Dec. iii. cap. x. Gomara, Cap. Ixxxix. " Lo mataron; i comiefon con todos las Espanoles que sacq, i aun quebraron el batel. Los otros que de los Navios miruban, alcarou anclas i velas, sin osar tomar venganca de la muerte de su Capituu." T 146 obliged to lighten them at the entrance of the river. Here he erected a Fort. It is obvious, on looking at a map of this reign, and com paring it with the statement of Herrera, that the river spo ken of might be either the Uruguay, which, on the right, takes a northern direction, or one of the various streams into which the Parana is broken by the islands at its mouth. Ca bot would hardly follow the Uruguay, because it evidently struck into Brasil, and, at a much higher point of ascent, he is found avoiding, expressly for that reason, a great river on the right hand. In speaking of the position occupied by his ships he states it, according to Herrera, to be on the Brasil, meaning the northern side of the river, a mode of designa tion, which, supposing him, as we reasonably may, to have been aware of the general course of the great stream discov ered by De Sol is, would not distinguish any position up the Uruguay, both sides of which were equally within that re gion, according to the distribution with reference to which he spoke. But the position of St Salvador is conclusively settled by information from another quarter. In Hakluyt (vol. iii. p. 729), is a Ruttier for The River Plate/' The pilot who prepared it gives the various methods of striking the mouths of the Parana in proceeding from the island of Martin Garcia. A caution is interposed " and if you fall into the mouth of the river which is called the Uruay you must leave it on the right hand." He adds that all the mouths of the Parana, which are five in number, have their eastern termination infested with shoals for an extent of more than two leagues. Describing one of the routes more particularly, ne says, " From the isle of Martin Garcia unto St Salvador, is nine or ten leagues. This is an island which standeth two leagues within theirs* mouth, where Sebastian Caboto took possession" The pilot, it will be seen, gives the name of St Salvador, not to the river, but to a port. Cabot himself does the same, for in describing the assault finally made on the upper fort by the natives, he speaks of a similar attack on 147 the port of St Salvador, where the ships lay.* It seems certain, then, that the first position fortified by Cabot was in the most northern mouth of the Parana, on an island about two leagues from where it reaches the La Plata, On the map of Louis Stanislaus d'Arcy de la Rochette,f this most north ern avenue is divided into two parts, the upper of which is designated as " Rio Paca," and the lower, that issues into the La Plata, as " Rio Naranjos." St Salvador was, of course, situated on the latter, or perhaps on the stream next in order to the south, which also communicates with the Rio Paca and thus forms with the Rio Naranjos a considerable delta. In a Memoir drawn up by Lopez Vaz, a Portuguese, and taken with the author by the fleet sent forth in 1586 by the Earl of Cumberland, the fort where Cabot left his ships is said to be then standing. Its distance from the sea is, however, mis stated either by him or the translator (Hakluyt, vol. iii. p. 788). It is desirable to fix this first point of occupation, not only as a matter curious in itself, but because Charlevoix (Histoire du Paraguay, torn* i. p. 27), with his usual wild inaccuracy, would throw the whole subject into confusion. He repre sents Cabot to have finally left the ships at the island of St Gabriel, and proceeded in boats up the Uruguay, by mistake, and he imagines two reasons why such a blunder was commit ted. He does not even allow the Uruguay to have been the * "Lomesmo hizieron de la poblacion que avian hecho en el puerto que Raman de S. Salvador adonde estaban los navios" (Herrera, Dec. iv. lib. viii. cap. xi.). f " Colombia prima or South America, in which it has been attempted to de lineate the extent of our knowledge of that continent, extracted chiefly from the original manuscript Maps of His Excellency, the late Chevalier Pinto; likewise from those of Joao Joaquim da Rocha, Joao da Costa Ferreira, El Padre Fran cisco Manuel Sobreviela, &c. And from the most authentic edited accounts of those countries. Digested and constructed by the late eminent and learned Geo grapher, Louis Stanislas D'Arcy de la Rochette. London, published by William Faden, Geographer to His Majesty and te His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales, June 4th, 1807-" This Map is in the Topographical Department of the King's Library, British Museum. 148 St Salvador, but makes it one of the tributaries of that river a considerable distance up the stream. In order to avoid the tedious interruption of the narrative, one other probable misconception was not adverted to at the moment. It has been assumed, with Herrera, that Cabot left his vessels at the island of St Gabriel, and proceeded thence in boats. More probably, however, the island of Martin Garcia was the one intended. Eden says expressly (fol. 316), that De Solis was killed in attempting to take possession of the island of Martin Garcia, and that it was the same afterwards carried by Cabot. We must bear in mind that Herrera is giving, somewhat loftily and reluctantly, the details of an expe dition to which he attaches little importance, and he might not care for minute accuracy. He saw the name of Gabriel confer red by Cabot, and did not choose, perhaps, to occupy the page of his History with describing the further progress of six leagues before the ships were quitted. The account of Eden, who approached the subject in a different temper, is confirmed by other considerations. The island is spoken of by Herrera as one standing by itself. Now the St Gabriel is a group of small islets, correctly stated in the " Ruttier" to be five in num ber. But still more conclusively : Cabot's report, as given by Herrera, states that seven leagues from the island at which he left his ships, he came to the mouth of a river, which he called St Salvador, and to which he afterwards brought up his ships. Now the " Ruttier" speaks of the position at St Salvador, as nine leagues in all from the island of Martin Garcia, two of which being up the St Salvador, there is, of course, an exact correspondence. The St Gabriel group, on the contrary, is correctly stated in the " Ruttier" to lie six leagues lower down than the island of Martin Garcia. While the statement of Eden produces greater harmony in the ac counts, the position of the fort is not contingent on success in this reconciliation, but seems conclusively settled by the language of the " Ruttier." 149 An incident is mentioned by Gomara,* but without the attendant circumstances, as occurring at this point, from which it would appear that the position was not gained without resistance. The natives killed and carried off two Spaniards but declared, in a spirit of fierce derision, that they would not eat them, as they were soldiers, of whose flesh they had already had a specimen in De Solis and his followers! * Gomara, cap. Ixxxix. "En el puerto de San Salvador que es otro Rio quar- enta. leguas arriba, que entra en el de la Plata, le mataron los Indies dos Espanoles i no los quisieron comer diciendo que eran Soldados que ia los havian probado en Solis i sus companeros." 150 CHAP. XXI. CABOT PROCEEDS UP THE PARANA ERECT? ANOTHER FORT CALLED SAN- TUS SPIRITUS, AND AFTERWARDS FORT CABOT ITS POSITION CON TINUES TO ASCEND CURIOSITY OF THE NATIVES AS TO THE EXPEDITION PASSES THE MOUTH OF THE PARANA ENTERS THE PARAGUAY SAN- OtTINARY BATTLE THIRTY-FOUR LEAGUES UP THAT RIVER THREE HUNDRED OF THE NATIVES KILLED, WITH A LOSS TO CABOT OF TWENTY- FIVE OF HIS PARTY MAINTAINS HIS POSITION GARCIA ENTERS THE RIVER INTERVIEW WITH CABOT MISTAKES OF CHARLEVOIX, 8cC. CABOT RETURNS TO THE FORT u SANTUS SPIRITUS." HAVING completed the Fort, and taken every precaution for the safety of the ships at St Salvador, Cabot resolved to as cend the Parana. Leaving, therefore, a party under the command of Antonio de Grajeda, he proceeded in the boats and a caravel cut down for the purpose. The point at which he next paused and built a second Fort, is not a matter of doubt. It was on the south bank of the Parana, near a river called by the natives Zarcaranna or Carcaranna. This name was subsequently changed by the Spaniards into Terceiro. On the map of De la Rochette, already referred to, and also on that of Juan de la Cruz Canoy Olmedilla,* it is designated at the early stages as Terceiro, but lower down, gathering strength, it re-assumes the aboriginal title. The Fort stood not immedi ately on the bank of this river but some miles further up the * " Mapa Geografica de America Meridional dispuesto y gravado por de Juan de la Cruz Canoy Olmedilla, Geogfo- Pens d - de S. M. Individuo de la Rl. Academia de S n Fernando, y de la Sociedad Bascongada de los Amig-os del Pais ; teniendo presentes varies mapas y noticias originates con arreglo d observaciones astrono- micas Ano de 1775. Este Mapa de los Dominios Espanoles y Portugueses en America Meredional, es una copia literal y exacta de un Mapa Espanol mui raro ; compuesto y gravado en Madrid, ano 1775, de orden del Rey Espana, por D n - Juan de la Cruz Cano y Oniedilla, Geo f o- Pe do - de S. M. C. Londres, Publicardo por Guillermo Faden, Geografo del Rey, y del Principe de Gales, Enero 1. de 1799.' 151 Parana, as appears by the earliest maps, and by the small but admirable one of D'Anville, in vol. xxi. of the " Letters, Edi- fiantes et curieuses."* On the great map of De la Rochette its position is marked with much precision. JThere is laid down the "Cart Road" from Buenos Ayres to Sante Fe, which passes through El Rosario and 8. Miguel; then comes "el Rincon de Caboto, Fort destroyed ;" then Calcachi, and, a little beyond this last, the river Monge. The same repre^ sentation is made, substantially, by Juan de la Cruz Canay Olmedilla. The only remark of Cabot with regard to the na tives of this quarter which Herrera repeats is, that they were intelligent (" gente de buena razon"). He left in this fort a garrison under the command of Gre- gorio Caro, who had commanded the Maria del Espinar, one of the ships of the squadron, and proceeded in person further up the river* His force must now have been inconsiderable, consisting, as it did, originally, of only one hundred and fifty men, increased perhaps by the gentlemen volunteers. Be sides the loss of three principal officers, and inevitable mortal ity, he had weakened his numbers by leaving garrisons in two forts. Yet his plan was, undoubtedly, a prudent one of thus forming points on which he could fall back, in case of disaster, and break the force and rapidity of a rush towards the vessels. Herrera furnishes no account of his intermediate movements until he reaches the Parana. The incidents which occurred during that long and interesting route are therefore unknown, except from a slight glimpse given in the conver sation reported in Ramusio. In ascending the river, Cabot is there represented as " fyndynge it every where verye fayre and inhabited with infinite people which with admyration came rannynge dayly to oure shyppes."f * "Lettres Edifiantes et curieuses ecrites des Missions Etrangers par quelques Missionaires de la Campagnie de Jesus." The work is in the King's Library, British Museum (title in Catalogue Epistolae). f Richard Eden's Decades, fol, 255. The original in Ramusio, torn. i. fol. 415. " Trovandolo sempre bellissirao et habitato da infiniti popoli che per maraviglis* correvano k vedermi." 152 On reaching the junction of the Parana and Paraguay, he saw that the direction of the former was to Brasil, and, there fore, leaving it on his right lie ascended thirty-four leagues up the other. The region on which he was now entering presented a new aspect. For the first time, the natives were found engaged in the cultivation of the soil, and, with the feeling that springs from exclusive property, they regarded the strangers with jealousy. The tribes in this quarter are marked, both on the old and the recent maps, as distinguished for ferocity and as the deadliest enemies of the Spaniards and Portuguese. A collision soon took place. Three of Cabot's men having, in cautiously, strayed from the main body to gather the fruit of the palm tree, were seized by the natives. There followed a fierce and very sanguinary battle. Three hundred of the natives were killed, and Cabot lost twenty-five of his party.* He would seem to have maintained his position, for, among the incidents occurring below, to which it is time to turn, we find the commander of the lower fort apprised, by letter, of what had taken place. The Portuguese Diego Garcia now re-appears in the nar rative of Herrera. That personage, who had left Spain in August 1526, after touching at the Canaries and Cape de Verds proceeded to the coast of Brasil, and is found in January 1527f at the Abrolhos shoals. He visits the Bay of All Saints, the Island of Patos (now St Catherine), all places at which Cabot had touched, and finally the La Plata. We are now without dates, except that in ascending the river Good Friday is mentioned as the day of his departure from Santus Spiri- tus.f Of his previous history nothing is known, except from the anecdote told by Herrera of the fraud on his employers in hiring the principal vessel to the slave-dealer at Cape Vincent. We might charitably conclude that he was looking for Juan * Herrera, Dec. iv. lib. i. cap. i. t Ib., Dec. iv. lib. i. cap. i. *Ib., Dec. iv. lib. i. cap. i. 153 de Cartagena and the French priest ; but, unfortunately for his fair fame, those persons were put on shore by Magellan, at Port St Julien, in Patagonia, some fifteen degrees to the southward of the La Plata. He found the ships of Cabot at St Salvador, as we left them, under the charge of Antonio de Grajeda, whose anx ious vigilance was increased by a letter' just received from Cabot, announcing the bloody affair above, and probably sent down with the wounded. Grajeda, seeing strangers approach, supposed that they were the mutineers whom Cabot had put on shore, the two brothers Roxas and Martin Mendez.* Un der this impression, he manned his boats, and proceeded in force against them. At the moment of collision, Diego Gar cia caused himself to be recognized, and the parties returned amicably together to St Salvador. Garcia here sent away his ship to fulfil the contract about the slaves, and brought his remaining small vessels to St Salvador, which was found, on examination, to offer the most secure harbour. Proceeding up the river with two brigantines and sixty men, he reached the Fort of Santw Spiritus^ and required the commander, Gre- gorio Caro, to surrender it, as the right of discovery belonged not to Cabot, but to himself, under the orders of the Empe ror. The answer of Caro was, that he held the Fort in the name of the Emperor and of Sebastian Cabot ; but that he was willing to render it useful, in any way, to the new-comers, He begged, as a favour, of Garcia, that if, on ascending the river, he found that any of the Spaniards had been taken, he would use his efforts to ransom them, " because, although he knew that Cabot had defeated the Indians, yet it was imposs ible but that some must have been taken."f It is plain, from * Here occurs the expression from which it is inferred, that the two mutineers whose names are so nearly alike were brothers, " vieron dos naos de Sebastian Gaboto cuio Teniente era Anton de Grajeda que salio con ciertos Canoas i un Batel armados pensando que eran los dos Hermanos Roxas \ Martin Mendez, que iban contra el porquc Sebastian Gaboto, por inquietos, los havia dexado en una isla desterrados entre los Indies." Herrera, Dec. iv. lib. i. cap. i. f "Porque aunque sabia que Sebastian Gaboto havia desbaratado los Indios era imposible que no huviesen peligrado algunos." Herrera, Dec. iv lib. i. cap. i. u 154 these expressions, that Cabot was known to have made good his stand. Caro personally pledged himself to the repayment of whatever Garcia might find it necessary to advance in the way of ransom; and he begged, if Cabot had fallen, that Garr cia would not leave them in that country.* On arriving at the junction of the Parana and Paraguay, Garcia, instead of proceeding to support Cabot, turned into the former river, about which he makes a report that Her- rera declines to insert, as Nunez Cabeca de Vaca had subse quently examined it with greater care. At length, he reached the Port of Santa Jlna^ the name given by Cabot to his last position. Herrera, although not accurate as to distances, de termines the place of meeting, by stating it to have been where the Indians had killed twenty- five Spaniards ; and hav ing his own authority for fixing that point thirty-four leagues up the Paraguay, we may suppose that Cabot, after chastising the natives, had come to a good understanding with them. He was employed, as we shall hereafter have reason to con clude, in diligently collecting information about the region from which had been brought the precious metals that he saw in this quarter. Of the circumstances attending the interview at Santa Ana nothing is known ; but Garcia, doubtless, repeated the remon strance which he had addressed to the commander of the fort. It was not in the character of Cabot, or consistent with his standing in Spain, to struggle for lawless, or even doubtful, power, and he descended the river in company with Garcia. In the absence of any evidence as to these points, imagina tion has been drawn upon. Charlevoix, as has been already stated, supposes Garcia to have been sent into the La Plata by the Captain- General of Brasil, thus betraying an entire ignorance of the precise statement of Herrera, and of the fact that there was no such officer as he speaks of, until many "Qu* si hallase muerto a Sebastian Gaboto le rogaba que no los dcxasse alii." Ib. 155 years after. To suit this main fiction, he fabricates a series of collateral incidents equally unfounded and ridiculous.* * "Gabot yit arriver a son Camp un Capitaine Portugais nomme Diegue Gar- cias lequel avoit etc envoie" par le Capitaine General de Bresil pour reconnoitre le pals et en prendre possession au nom de la Couronne de Portugal mais qui n'&voit pas assez de monde pour executer sa Commission malgre les Espagnols, qu'il ne s'etoitpas attendu. de trouver en si grande nombre sur les bords du Paraguay. Gabot de son cot fit reflexion qu'il ne pourroit jamais empecbxr les Portugais de se rendre maitres du pays si ils y revenoient avec des forces superieures que la prox- imit6 du Bresel leur donnoit le moien d'y faire entrer en peu de terns; sur quoi il prit le parti de faire quelques presens a Garcias pour I'engager a le suivre au Fart du S. Esprit. II y reussit!" &c. &c. 156 CHAP. XXII. CABOT'S REPORT TO CHARLES v. ITS PRESUMED CONTENTS PROSPECT WHICH IT HELD OUT PERU CONTEMPLATED IN HIS ORIGINAL PLAN OF 1524 SPECIMENS FOUND BY CABOT OF THE PRECIOUS METALS OBTAINED XHENCE BY THE GUARANIS EMPEROR RESOLVES ON A GREAT EXPEDI TION HIS PECUNIARY EMBARRASSMENTS PIZARRO OFFERS TO MAKE THE CONQUEST OF PERU AT HIS OWN EXPENSE REFLECTIONS THE NAME RIO DE LA PLATA NOT CONFERRED BY CABOT MISREPRESENTA TION ON THIS AND OTHEH POINTS. ON returning to the Fort of Santus Spiritus, Cabot made ar rangements to convey to the Emperor intelligence of his dis coveries. He prepared, also, a comprehensive statement of the incidents which had occurred since he left Seville, and of the circumstances which compelled him to abandon the expe dition originally contemplated, This report is referred to by Herrera 9 * but while all the calumnies of Cabot's enemies are repeated > he furnishes, as has been before remarked, no part of the vindication which must have been conclusive. This document is probably yet in existence amongst the ar chives of Spain. The bearers of the communication wereHernando Calderon, and an individual designated by Herrera in one place as Jorge Barlo, and in another as Jorge Barloque, conjectured to have been one of the two English gentlemen, friends of Thome, who accompanied the expedition, and whose name, probably George Barlow, has undergone a slighter transformation than might have been anticipated. Of the hopes and prospects which this communication held out we are ignorant ; and only know that the Emperor re- * Dec. iv. lib. iii. cap. i. 157 solved to fit out a great expedition, but that the execution of his intention was unfortunately too long delayed. It may well be imagined that the expectations of Cabot had been raised to a high pitch, and that he eagerly solicited per mission and means to follow up the enterprise. He had reach ed the waters which, rising in Potosi, fall into the Paraguay, and had, doubtless, ascertained the quarter to which the na tives were indebted for those ornaments of the precious metals which he saw about* their persons. Even from the fort on the Parana,, the obstacles between him and Peru present no very formidable difficulty to the modern traveller. That he had his eye on that empire, the riches of which Pizarro was enabled, a few years afterwards, to reach by a different route, may be inferred from the care with which he is found collect ing information, and the obvious facilities which they disclose. In an abstract given by Herrera of Cabot's final report to the emperor, there occur the following passages: "The principal tribe of Indians in that region are the Guaranzs, a people war like, treacherous, and arrogant, who give the appellation of slaves to all who speak a different language." "In the time of Guaynacapa, King of Peru, father of Atabilipa, these people made an irruption into his dominions, which extend more than five hundred leagues, and reached Peru, and after a most destructive progress, returned home in triumph," &c. "Cabot negotiated a peace with this tribe. By friendly intercourse he came to leafn many secrets of the country, and procured from them gold and silver which they had brought from Pert*," &c.* It had been a part of Cabot's original plan, as stated by Peter Martyr, to visit the western coast of America $ " Hav ing passed the winding Strait of Magellan, he is to direct his course to the right hand in the rear of our supposed Con tinent." f < He will scour along all the South side of our sup- * "La relacion que hico al Rey fue que la mas principal generacion de Inclios de aquella tierra son los Guaranis t gente guerrera, traydora y sobervia, y que llaman esclavos a todos los que no son de su lengua." Herrera, Dec. iv. lib. viii. cap. xi. " En tiempo de Guaynacapa, Rey de el Peru, Padre de Atabilipa, salieron grandes companias y caminando por todos las tierras de su nacion, que se es- tenden mas de quinientas leguas llegaron a tierra del Peru y despues de aver hecho grandes destruyciones se bolvieron vitoriososa su naturaleca." Ib. "Y haviendo hecho Sebastian Goboto la Paz con esta generacion, &c. con el amitad destos supo muchos secretos de la tierra y huvo de ellos oro y plata de la que traian del Peru." 158 posed Continent, and arrive at the Colonies of Panama and Nata erected on those shores, the bounds of the Golden Cas tile, and whosoever at that time shall be governor of that pro vince called Golden Castile is to give us intelligence of his suc cess."* Cabot now found himself within striking distance of these regions, and the intelligence received quickened his eagerness to reach them. The intervening obstacles were nothing to his restless activity and indomitable spirit, and the opposition to be encountered not worth a thought when he knew that a war-party of the savages, whom his own little band had so severely chastised, were able to overrun the Empire of Peru and carry off its treasures. But however well disposed the Emperor might be to yield a ready belief to the representations of Cabot, the means were absolutely wanting to furnish the promised aid. The only key to this part of the history of Charles V. , is a recollection of his struggles with pecuniary embarrassment. The soldiers of Bourbon had muthiied for want of pay, and were brought back to duty only by the great personal exertions and influ ence of their chief, and by the hope of plunder; ancl even after the sack of Rome, they refused to quit that city until the arrears due to them should be discharged, a condition," says Dr Robertson,f " which they knew to be impossible." During the very year in which Cabot's messengers arrived, the Cortes had refused the grant of money solicited by the Emperor. J We have already had occasion to advert to the mortgage of the Moluccas to Portugal in 1529, as security for a loan, to the infinite chagrin of his Castilian subjects. Pi- zarro had the advantage of being able to employ personal im portunity, and he asked no money. On 26th July 1528, the Emperor yielded to that adventurer a grant of the entire range of coast, which it had been part of Cabot's plan of 1524 to visit. At his own expense Pizarro engaged to raise a large force, " and to provide the ships, arms, and warlike stores requisite, towards subjecting to the Crown of Castile the * Peter Martyr, Dec. vii. cap. vi. f Life of Charles V., book v. 159 country of which the government was allotted to him."* He proceeded at once to the task, though it was not until Feb ruary 1531 that he was enabled to set out from Panama on his successful, but infamous, career. It were idle to indulge the imagination, in speculating on the probable result had the expedition to Peru been conduct ed by Cabot, With all the better qualities of Pizarro, it is certain that the very elevation of his moral character must have stood in the way of that rapid desolation, and fierce ex action, which have made the downfall of the Peruvian Em pire a subject of vulgar admiration. In following Pizarro, the heart sickens at a tissue of cruelty, fraud, treachery, and cold-blooded murder, unrelieved even by the presence of great danger ; for after the resistance at the island of Puna, which detained him for six months, no serious obstacles were encountered. Even the Guaranis, who had achieved an easy conquest over the unwarlike Peruvians, in the preceding reign, were guiltless of the atrocities which marked his pro gress. Of one thing we may be certain. Had the conquest fallen to the lot of Cabot> the blackest page of the History of Spanish America would have been spared. The murder of the Inca, to gratify the pique of an illiterate! ruffian, forms one of the most horrid images of History. It was no less impolitic than atrocious, and roused the indignation even of the des- * Robertson's History of America, book vi. f " Among all the European Arts, what he admired most was that of reading and writing; and he long deliberated with himself, whether he should regard it as a natural or acquired talent. In order to determine this, he desired one of the soldiers who guarded him, to write the name of God on the nail of his thumb. This he showed successively to several Spaniards, asking its meaning; and to his amazement, they all, without hesitation, returned the same answer. At length Pizarro entered ; and on presenting i to him, he blushed, and with some confu sion was obliged to acknowledge his ignorance. From that moment, Atahualpa considered him as a mean person, less instructed than his own soldiers; and he had not address enough to conceal the sentiments with which this discovery inspired him. To be the object of a barbarian's scorn not only mortified the pride of Pi zarro, but excited such resentment in his breast, as added force to all the other considerations which prompted him to put the Inca to death." (Robertson's Hist- America. 160 peradoes who accompanied Pizarro. The career of Cabot who, at the Council Board of the Indies, had been a party to the order forbidding even the abduction of a Native, could not have been stained by crimes which make us turn with horror from the guilty splendour of the page that records them. Reverting to the Despatch of Cabot to the Emperor, it re mains to notice a charge against hini of having conferred the name of Rio de la Plata, or River of Silver, with a view to colour his failure, and to encourage deceptive hopes. Now Gomara, who wrote half a century before Herrera, tells us expressly that this designation was given by the original dis coverer, De Solis (cap. Ixxxix.). "Topb con un grandissimo Rio que los Naturales Hainan Paranaguaca, que quiere decir Rio como Mar o Agua grande; vido en el muestra de Plata, inombrolo de ella." ("He fell in with an immense river which- the natives called Paran- aguacay that is to say, a river like the sea or great water ; he saw in it specimens of silver, and named it from that circumstance") Thus in a work dedicated to the Emperor, we find the origin of that name which Cabot is represented to have fraud ulently conferred so long afterwards for the purpose of mis- .leading him! The same statement is made by Lopez Vaz (Hakluyt, vol. iii. p. 788), "The first Spaniard that entered this river and inhabited the same, was called Solis, who passed up a hundred leagues into it, and called it by the name of Rio de La Plata, that is to say, The River of Silver" Herrera gives a somewhat different account. In the chap ter devoted to Garcia's expedition, he says after speaking of the precious metals obtained by Cabot, "Tambien Diego Garcia huro alguna cantidad de Plata de los Indies, desde donde se llamo este Rio de la Plata porque fue la primera que se traxo a Castilla de las Indios, i era de la que los Indios Guaranis traian en planchas i otras piecas grandes de las Provincias del Peru."* * Herrera, Dec. iv. lib. i. cap. i. " Diego Garcia also obtained some portion of silver from the Indians, whence it was called Rio de La Plata, or River of Silver, because this was the first of that metal brought to Spain from the Indies, and it was part of that which the Guaranis Indians obtained in plates and other large pieces from the Provinces of Peru." 161 Let us, then, for a moment, suppose Gomara and Lopez Vaz in error ; and further, that the tide was not a device of Garcia who was struggling to connect himself ostentatiously with this region who boasts of his superior activity in exploring it and with whose name, previously rendered infamous, Her- rera more immediately associates the appellation. After all these concessions it would then appear that the epithet was one popularly applied (like Brazil, the Spice Islands, the Sugar Islands, &c.), from the article the Silver of Potosi which had been brought thence and attracted general attention and interest. There is not the least reason to suppose that it was conferred by Cabot, or that he concealed the quarter whence the treasure came a fact which Herrera is found correctly stating from his Report. That document was doubtless full and explicit ; giving a prominent place to the hopes which had been excited, but with a statement, also, of the great fertility of the country, its healthy climate, and general advantages for colonization, aside from the avenue it offered to those regions of the precious metals embraced in the plan of 1524. But while of the Spanish writers, evil-disposed as they are to Cabot, no one has ventured to put forth any such charge of deception, his own countrymen have exhibited an eager anxiety to fasten on him the odious accusation, Two speci mens may suffice : "Cabot, in the mean time, contrived to Bend home to the Emperor an account of his proceedings; and as he had found among the savages of the interior some ornaments of gold and silver, which he easily obtained in exchange for various trinkets, he took advantage of this slender circumstance to represent the country as abounding in those mdakt and in conformity with his description, he gone the river the name of La Plata."* " Juan Dias de Solis had discovered a prodigious river to which he gave his own name, and where he was killed and eaten by an ambush of savages. In 1525, [this error has already been exposed] Cabot, following the tract of Magalhaens, arrived at the same stream, and explored it as high as the Paraguay. A little gold and silver, which had been obtained from the natives, raised his opinion of the Dr Lardner's Cyclopaedia, History of Maritime and Inland Discovery, vot ti. V 162 importance of the country; the river was named Rio de la Plata, and many an ad venturer was lured to his destruction by this deceptive title."* It is scarcely necessary to add that the statement that Ca bot was "sent to the coast of Brasil, where he made the important discovery of the Rio de la Plata, "f advances for him an unfounded claim. Some difference of opinion exists as to the time of the discovery by De Solis. Herrera, in the "Description de las Indias Occidentales" (cap. xxiv.), pre fixed to his History, says, "Juan Diaz de Solis descubrio el Rio de la Plata ano de 1515 i Sebastian Gaboto Ingles iendo con armada por orden del Emperador," the minute local knowledge of her possessions, of which his confidential station in that country must have made him master. The Public Records now supply us with dates. On the 6th January, in the second year of Edward VI., a pension was granted to him of two hundred and fifty marks (166/. 13. 4c?.). Hakluyt (vol. iii. p. 10) seems irresolute as to the year, according the ordinary computation; for, at the close of the grant, in the original Latin, he declares it to be 1549, and at the end of his own translation, 1548. The former is un doubtedly correct, and so stated by Rymer (vol. xv. p. 181). The pension is recited to be " In consideration boni et ac- ceptabilis servitii nobis per dilectum servientem nostrum Se- bastianum Cabotum impensi atque impendendi" (in consider ation of the good and acceptable service done and to be done unto us by our beloved servant Sebastian Cabot). The precise nature of the duties imposed on him does not Burnet's History of the Reformation, vol. ii. p. 225. | Strype's Historical Memorials, vol. ii. p. 190. 174 appear. It is usually stated, and amongst others by Hakluyt, that the office of Grand Pilot of England was now created, and Cabot appointed to fill it; but this is very questionable.* Certain it is that his functions were far more varied and ex tensive than those implied in such a title. He would seem to have exercised a general supervision over the maritime con cerns of the country, under the eye of the King and the Council, and to have been called upon whenever there was occasion for nautical skill and experience. One curious in stance occurs of the manner in which the wishes of individuals were made to yield to his opinion of what was required by the exigences of the public service. We find (Hakluyt, vol. ii. part ii. p. 8) one James Alday offering as an explanation of his not having gone as master on a proposed voyage to the Levant, that he was stayed " By the prince's letters which my master Sebastian Gabota had obtained for that purpose to my great grief." He is called upon (Hakluyt, vol. iiL p. 719) to be pre sent at the examination of a French pilot who had long fre quented the coast of Brasil, and there is reason to believe that the minute instructions for the navigation of the La Plata (ib. p. 728) are from himself. * See Appendix (C.). 175 CHAP. XXVI. PUBLIC EXPLANATION BY CABOT TO EDWARD VI. OF THE PHENOMENA OF THE VARIATION OF THE NEEDLE STATEMENT OF LIVIO SANUTO- POINT OF " NO VARIATION" FIXED BY CABOT ADOPTED AFTERWARDS BY MERCATOR FOR HIS FIRST MERIDIAN REFERENCE TO CABOT*S MAP EARLY TESTIMONIALS ALLUSION TO THE ENGLISH DISCOVERIES IN THE EDITION OF PTOLEMY PUBLISHED AT ROME IN 1508 FOURNIER ATTENTION TO NOTE THE VARIATION BY THE SEAMEN OF CABOT*& SCHOOL HIS THEORY, IF A NARROW ONE, WOULD HAVE, BEEN THUS EXPOSED. ALLUSION was made, on a former occasion, to the fact stated by the noble Venetian, Livio Sanuto, that Cabot had explained to the King of England the whole subject of the variation of the needle. There is reason to suppose, from what we know of Sanuto's life, that the incident to which he alludes must have occurred at the period now reached. His statement* is that many years before the period at which he wrote, his friend Guido Gianeti de Fano informed him that Sebastian Cabot was the first discoverer of this secret of nature which he explained to the King of England, near whom the said Gianeti at that time resided, and was held, as Sanuto under stood from others, in the highest esteem. Cabot also showed the extent of the variation, and that it was different in dif ferent places, f Sanuto being engaged in the construction of an instrument in reference to the longitude, it became with him a matter of eager interest to ascertain a point of no variation. The Geographia is in the Library of the British Museum, title in Catalogue " Sanuto." It was published at Venice, 1588, after the author's death. t Fu di tal secreto il riconoscitore, qual egli paleso poi al serenissimo Re d* Inghilterra, pressoal quale (come poi daaltri intesi) esso Gianetti all* hora honor- atissimo si ritrovaa? et egli dimostro insieme, quanta fusse questa distaaza, eckc non appareva in ciascun luogo la medesima," Lib. rim fol. 2. 176 " Con versing on this subject with Gianeti, he undertook to obtain for me, through a gentleman named Bartholomew Gom- pagni, then in England, this information wh^h he himself had not gathered."* The person thus addressed sent word of what he had learn ed from Cabot, and Sanoto remarks that he had, subsequently, further assurance cf the accuracy of the report thus made to him. He saw a chart of navigation, executed by hand with the greatest care, and carefully compared with one by Cabot himself, in which the position of this meridian was seen to be one hundred and ten miles to the west of the island of Floras, one of the Azores.* It is scarcely necessary to add that the First ^Meridian on the maps of Mercafor, running through the most western point of the Azores, was adopted with reference to the supposed coincidence in that quarter of the true and magnetic poles. In the course of the same memoir, Sanuto refers repeatedly to the Map, and adverts to the observations as to the vari ation of the compass made by Cabot at the Equator. The disappearance of this Document becomes at every turn A mat ter equally of astonishment and regret. Aside from the mass of papers left with Worthington, we have not only seen that the published map was hung up in the Gallery at Whitehall, but have actually traced a copy to Ortelius, to the Earl of Bed ford, and now to Sanuto. The assertion is found in almost all the old writers that Ca bot was the first who noticed the variation. He was, at least, the first who gave to it an earnest attention, marked its degrees in various parts of the world, and attempted to frame a theory on the subject. His earliest transatlantic voyage carried him " Ragionatone io di questo col detto Gianneti, fece egli, che da un gentil* huomo nominate Bartolomeo Compagni, che in Inghilterre si tratteneva, slnteae cio, ch* egli dal detto Caboto ne seppe." f " Bt a quello ancora, che io dapoi vidi con gli occhi jniei in una carta da navigare diligentissima fatta a mano, e tutta ritratta a punto da una propria del detto Caboto ; nella quale si riconosce il luogo del detto Meridiano esser per miglia cento e dieci lontano verso Occidente dalla Isola detta Fiori di quelle pur delli Azori." 177 to the very quarter where it is exhibited in a manner so sud den and striking, that modern navigators seem to concur in placing there one of the magnetic poles. The La Plata, too, is another theatre of its most startling appearance ; and Ca bot's long residence in that region must have secured his de liberate attention to the subject with the advantage of thirty years of intermediate observation and reflection. There is a curious piece of evidence to show how early the Northern region discovered by Cabot was associated with the alarm which this phenomenon must, in the first instance, have excited On the great Map of the World which accompanies the edition of Ptolemy published at Rome in 1508, is the follow ing inscription, commencing far beyond Terra Nova and the Insula Bacalaurus "Hie, compassus navium non tenet, nee naves quse ferrum tenent revertere valent."* It is impossible to doubt that the reference is to the well- known effect produced there on the compass. Beneventus, who prepared the supplemental matter for this edition of Ptolemy, professes to have a knowledge of the discoveries made by Columbus, by the Portuguese, and by the English ("Columbi et Lusitanorum atque Britannorum quos Anglos nunc dici- mus"). Fournier, in his old, but yet highly-esteemed, Treatise on Hydrography, (Liv. xi. cap. x.) says, it was understood that Sebastian Cabot had noted with great exactness the variation in the places he had discovered on the Northern Coasts of America.f As to Cabot's theory on the subject of the Variation, we are unable, in the absence of his Maps and Discourses, to offer even a conjecture. His exposition to the king would evi dently seem to have Leen something more than a mere state ment of isolated facts, and from the general recollection of "Here the ship's-compass loses its property, and no vessel with iron on board is able to get away." t "Que Cabot remarqua/ortf exacttment les declinaisons que Paymant Faisoit en (livers endroits des costes Septentrionales de I'Amer-que qu'il decouvrit." X 178 the Venetian ambassador that he represented it as different in different places, it may be inferred that he did not treat it as absolutely regulated by mere distance from a particular me- ridian. There is another satisfactory reason for believing that he could not have placed it on any narrow ground. The Sea men brought up in his school, and sailing under his instruc tions, were .particularly attentive to note the variation. Thus Stephen Burrough reports to us, (Hakluyt, vol. i. p. 290, &c.) within a short space, the degrees of it at three different points ; and, where this was habitually done, an error of the great nau tical Oracle if we suppose one to have cheated his long ex perience and profound observation would have been speedily detected and exposed. 179 CHAP. XXVII. MISTAKE OF PURCHAS, PINKERTON, DR HENRY IN HIS HISTORY OF GREAT BRITAIN, CAMPBELL IN THE LIVES OF THE ADMIRALS, AND OTHER WRI TERS, AS TO THE u KNIGHTING" OF JOHN OR SEBASTIAN CABOT. THE present may be a fit occasion to notice an absurd misconception on the part of many authors of reputation, some of whom represent Sebastian Cabot to have received the honour of knighthood, while others confer it on the father. Purchas (vol. iy. p. 1812), in his "English just Title to Virginia," refers to a Portrait of Sebastian Cabot which he had seen hung up in the King's Palace at Whitehall with this inscription; < Effigies Seb. Caboti Angli, filii Joannis Caboti militis aurati, <&c." Here was a fair opening for controversy. Does the description " militis aurati" apply to the father or to the son? The same difficulty occurs, with a curious coin cidence in the epithets, as that which Quinctilian (Inst. Orat, lib. vii. cap. 9) mentions, with regard to the Will of a Roman, who directed that there should be put up "statuam auream hastam tenentem," and the puzfcle was whether the statue or the spear was of gold. After the unpardonable blunders which it has been necessary to expose, we may look with some complacency on the pursuit of this perplexing matter. Purchas assumes that the words apply to the son, and ac cordingly we have " Sir Sebastian Cabot" running through his volumes. In a copy of verses addressed to " his friend Captain John Smith," and prefixed to the account of Virginia by the latter, Purchas exclaims "Hail, Sir Sebastian! England's Northern Pole, Virginia's finder!" and in a marginal note it is added, " America, named of Ame- 180 ricus Vesputius which discovered less than Colon or Sir Se bastian Cabot, and the Continent later. Colon first found the Isles 1492, the Continent 1498, above a year after Cabot had done it. He was set forth by Henry VII. , and after by Henry VIIL knighted, and made Grand Pilot of England by Edward VI." Captain Smith himself repeats all this " Sebastian Cabot discovered much more than these all, for he sailed to about 409 South of the line, and to 67 towards the North, for which King flenry VIIL knighted him and made him Grand Pilot of England." In the general Index to Pinker- ton's Collection of Voyages and Travels, the eye is caught, under the title Cabot, with the alluring reference "anec dotes of," and on turning to the place (vol. xiii. p. 4), the same statements are found. Now the difficulties are insur mountable as to Sebastian Cabot. In the last renewal of his pension in the reign of Mary (Rymer, vol. xv. p. 427 and 466), he is styled " Armiger," which shows that he had not, even up to that period, been knighted. In the Cotton MSS. (Claudius, C. iii.) is a paper, giving " the names and arms of such as have been advanced to the order of knighthood in the reigns of Henry VII., Henry VIIL, Edward VI., Mary and Elizabeth," in which no notice is taken of him. The point being thus clear with regard to the son, other writers have assumed as a matter of course, that the distinc tion must have been conferred on John Cabot. Accordingly, Campbell (Lives of the Admirals, art. Sir John Cabot] says of the father, " he then returned with a good cargo and three savages on board to England, where it seems he was knighted for this exploit, since, on the map of his discoveries drawn by his son Sebastian, and cut by Clement Adams, which hung in the Privy Gallery at Whitehall, there was this inscrip tion under the author's picture Effigies Seb. Caboti Angli filii lo. Caboti Venetiani Militis aurati." Thus Campbell derives his fact from Purchas, but draws a different inference from that writer. According to him, too, the knighting must have been, not by Henry VIIL as Purchas and Captain Smith have it, for there is reason to believe that the senior Cabot 181 died before the commencement of that reign, but by Henry VII., particularly as it took place on Cabot's return, and the monarch last named lived thirteen years after the " exploit." Campbell, therefore, has a " Memoir of Sir John Cabot/' and speaks again, with enthusiasm, of that " celebrated Venetian, Sir John Cabot." This version has been the more generally adopted, and amongst the rest by Dr Henry (History of Great Britain, vol. vi. p. 618), who informs us, on the authority of Campbell, that "John Cabot was graciously received and knighted on his return." The same statement is made in the Biographia Britannica, &c. To the utter confusion of all these grave authorities, a mo ment's consideration will show, that the words relied on do in themselves prove that knighthood had not been conferred. It is scarcely necessary to follow up this suggestion, by stating that in reference to one who had received that honour, they would have been not " Mititis aurati," but " Equitis aurati." Though the term miles is sometimes applied, in old docu ments, even to Peers, yet, as a popular designation, the lan guage of the inscription negatives the idea of knighthood. In the very works immediately Connected with the subject of the present volume, the appropriate phrase perpetually oc curs. Thus " Eques auratus" is used to designate Sir Hum phrey Gilbert (Hakluyt, vol. iii. p. 137), Sir Hugh Willoughby (ib. p. 142), Sir Martin Frobisher (ib. p. 142), Sir Fran cis Drake (ib. p. 143). In the dedication of Lok's translation of Peter Martyr, it Is in like manner used, and we see it, at this moment, on the " effigies" of Sir Walter Raleigh pre fixed to the first edition of his History of the World. It will probably be deemed very superfluous to refer to Selden's Titles of Honour (p. 830), for a confirmation of what has been stated. The weight of censure must fall on Purchas, who was ori ginally guilty of the blunder. The others assumed the fact of the knighting, and only exercised their ingenuity in de ciding whether the honour was conferred on the Father or the Son. 182 CHAP. XXVIII. STAGNATION OF TRADE IN ENGLAND CABOT CONSULTED Bf THE MER CHANTSURGES THE ENTERPRISE WHICH RESULTED IN THE TRADE TO RUSSIA PRELIMINARY DIFFICULTIES STRUGGLE WITH THE STILYARD THAT MONOPOLY BROKEN DOWN EARNESTNESS OF EDWARD VI. ON THE SUBJECT HIS MUNIFICENT DONATION TO CABOT AFTER THE RE SULT WAS DECLARED. IT is only from detached notes, such as those already referred to, and which meet the eye as it were by accident, that we can now form an idea of the diffusive nature of Cabot's ser vices. One Great Enterprise, however, stands by itself, and was destined to exercise an important influence on the com merce and naval greatness of England. An opportunity was afforded to Cabot of putting in execu tion a plan " which he long before had had in his mind,"* by its happening, incidentally, to fall in with the purposes of the London merchants. The period was one of great com mercial stagnation in England. " Our merchants perceived the commodities and wares of England to be in small request about us and near unto us, and that those merchandises which strangers, in the time and memory of our ancestors, did earnestly seek and desire, were now neglected and the price thereof abated, although they be carried to their own parts."! In this season of despondency Cabot was consulted, and the suggestions which he made were adopted : " Sebastian Caboto, a man in those days very renowned, happening to be in London, they began first of all to deal and consult diligently with him, and after much search and conference together, it was at last concluded, that three ships should be prepared and furnished out for the search and discovery of the northern * Eden's Decades, fol. 256. f Hakluyt, vol. i. p. 243. 183 part of the world, to open a way and passage to our men, for travel to new and unknown kingdoms "* Such is the authentic history of the impulse given to English commerce at this interesting crisis. The influence of Cabot is not only attested by the passage quoted, but in the Letters Patent of Incorporation it is declaredf that, in consideration of his having " been the chiefest setterforth of this journey or voyage, therefore we make, ordain, and constitute him, the said Sebastian, to be the first and present governor of the same fellowship and community byHhese presents, to have and enjoy the said office of governor to him, the said Sebastian Cabota, during his natural life, without amoving or dismiss ing from the same room." But a difficulty was encountered in the alleged exclusive privileges of a very powerful body, whose odious monopoly had long exercised its baneful influence on English commerce and manufactures : " The time was now at length come, that the eyes of the English nation were to be opened, for their discovering the immense damage which was sustained, by suf fering the German merchants of the house or college in London, called the Steel- yard, so long to enjoy advantages in the duty or custom of exporting English cloths, far beyond what the native English enjoyed ; which superior advantages possessed by those foreigners began, about this time, to be more evidently seen and felt, as the foreign commerce of England became more diffused. The Cities of Antwerp and Hamburgh possessed, at this time, the principal commerce of the northern .and middle parts of Europe ; and their factors, at the Steelyard, usually set what price they pleased on both their imports and exports ; and having the command of all the markets in England, with joint and united stocks, they broke all other merchants. Jpon these considerations, the English company of merchant adventurers made pressing remonstrances to King Edward the Sixth's Privy Council. These Hansea- tics were, moreover, accused (and particularly the Dantzickers) of defrauding the customs, by colouring, or taking under their own names, as they paid little or no custom, great quantities of the merchandise of other foreigners not entitled to their immunities. They were also accused of having frequently exceeded the bounds of even the great privileges granted to them by our Kings ; yet, by the force of great presents, they had purchased new grants."* " Having, for the last forty -five years, had the sole command of our commerce, (says the author) they had reduced the price of English wool to one shilling and six-pence per stone. The Steelyard merchants were also excused from aliens duties, * Voyage of Richard Chancellor, Hakluyt, vol. i. p. 243. f Hakluyt, vol. i. p. 268. * Anderson's History of Commerce, vol. ii. p. 80 M'Pherson's Annals of Com merce, vol. ii. p. 109 184 and yet all their exports and imports were made in foreign bottoms ; which was a very considerable loss to the nation."* " This is the substance of the whole business during- King Edward the Sixth's reign, of reversing the privileges of the Steelyard merchants, taken from our histo ries, but more particularly from I. Wheeler's Treatise of Commerce, published in quarto, in the year 1601 ; and, as he was then Secretary to the Merchant Adventur ers' Company, it may be supposed to be, in general, a true account, and is surely an useful part of commercial history. Wheeler adds, that by reversing these pri vileges, our own merchants shipped off in this year forty thousand cloths for Flan ders. Rapin, in his History of England, observes, that the Uegent of Flanders, as well as the City of Hamburgh, earnestly solicited to have the Steelyard merchants re-instated j but to no purpose."f The extraordinary interest felt by Edward himself on this subject is manifest from his Journal, in which the incidents are noted. J " 18th January, 1551. This day the Stiliard put in their answer lo a certain com- plaint, that the merchant adventurers laid against them." " 25th January, 155 1. The answer of the Stiliard was delivered to certain of my learned Counsel to look on and oversee.!' "18th February, 1551. The merchant adventurers put in their replication to the Stiliards answer." " 23rd February, 1551. A decree was made by the Board, that upon knowledge and information of their charters, they had found ; First, that they were no sufficient Corporation. 2. That their number, names, and rtation, was unknown. 3. That when they had forfeited their liberties, King Edward IV. did restore them on this condition, that they should colour no strangers' goods, which they had done. Also, that whereas in the beginning they shipped not past 8 clothes, after 100, after 1000, after that 6000 now in their name was shipped 44000 clothes in one year, and but 1100 of all other strangers. For these considerations sentence- was given, that they had forfeited their liberties, and were in like case with other strangers." The difficulties which had to be struggled with, maybe in ferred from the pertinacity with which the defeated party followed up the matter, even after a decision had been pro nounced. ThfUSj the following entries are found in the Jour nal of the youngJKing : " 28th February, 1551. There came Ambassadors from Hamburg and Lubeck, to speak on the behalf of the Stiliard merchants." "2d March 1551. The answer for the Ambassadors of the Stiliard was com- Ibid, f Ibid. * Published in Burnet's History of the Reformation, Tol. ii. from the Cotton MSS. 185 mitted to the Lord Chancellor, the two Secretaries, Sir Robert Bowes, Sir John Baker, Judge Montague, Griffith Solicitor, Gosnold, Goodrich, and Brooks." " 2d May, 1551. The Stiliard men received their answer; which was, to con firm the former judgment of my Council." The important agency of Cabot, in a result so auspicious not merely to the interests of commerce but to the public revenue, may be judged of from a donation bestowed on him, a few days after the decision.* "To Sebastian Cuboto, the great seaman, 200 pounds, by way of the king's majesty's reward, dated in March, 1551." Strype's Historical Memorials, vol. ii. p. 495. 186 CHAP. XXIX. PREPARATIONS FOR THE EXPEDITION PRECAUTIONS AS TO TIMBER- SHEATHING OF THE VESSELS NOW FIRST RESORTED TO IN ENGLAND EXAMINATION OF TWO TARTARS CHIEF COMMAND GIVEN TO SIR HUGH WILLOUGHBY RICHARD CHANCELLOR STEPHEN BURROUGH WILLIAM BURROUGHS ARTHUR PET THIS EXPEDITION CONFOUNDED WITH AN OTHER BY STRYPE AND CAMPBELL. A TRIUMPH having been obtained over the obstacles which had heretofore impeded the career of English commerce, pre parations were diligently made for the Expedition. The measures adopted for the safety of the ships indicate the presence of great skill and providence ; "strong and well- seasoned planks for the building" were provided, and the his torian of the expedition is struck with one noyel precaution. To guard against the worms " which many times pearceth and eateth through the strongest oak," it was resolved to " cover a piece of the keel of the shippe with thinne sheets of leade."* This is the first instance in England, of the practice of sheath ing, but it had long before been adopted in Spain, and had thus engaged the attention of Cabot. It may, indeed, have been originally suggested by him, as the first use of it is referred to 1514, two years before which time we find him passing into the service of Ferdinand, and advancing rapidly to posts of distinction as his value became apparent. Information was eagerly sought in every quarter as to the countries which the Expedition might visit. There were " two Tartarians" employed about the young king's stables. These persons were hunted up and an interpreter provided, "by whom they were demanded touching their country and the manners of their nation." But the poor creatures had * Hakluyt,vol. i. p. 243- 187 no story to tell, and betrayed plainly their addiction to strong drink. There was waggery in the City even at that early day. "They were able to answer nothing to the purpose, being indeed more acquainted (as one there merily and openly said) to toss pots, than to learn the states and dispositions of people."* The command of the expedition was an object of high am bition. Amongst those who pressed "very earnestly" for the post was Sir Hugh WilloUghby, a most valiant gentle man and well borne." He came recommended by a high reputation for " skill in the services of war," and it seems to have been thought no slight recommendation that he was of tall and commanding stature. The choice finally fell on him. In command of one of the ships, and with the title of Pilot- Major, was Richard Chancellor. He had been bred up in the household of Henry Sydney, father of Sir Philip Sydney. His character and merits, coupled with his brilliant success on this occasion, and subsequent untimely fate, seem to have made a deep impression on his contemporaries. He not only proved a skilful and intrepid seaman, but his remarks on the customs, religion, laws and manners of the countries visited, show him to have possessed a cultivated intellect, as well as great shrewdness and powers of observation. He would seem to have attracted the attention and enjoyed the friendship of Cabot; for Eden (Decades, fol. 357), in adverting to one of the phenomena of the ocean, mentions that the fact he relates was communicated to him by Chancellor, who derived it from Cabot. His was the only ship that succeeded in doubling the North Cape, and making her way to Russia. "For the government of other ships although divers men seemed willing, and made offers of themselves thereunto, yet by a common consent one Richard Chan- celer, a man of great estimation for many good parts of wit in him, was elected, in whom alone great hope for the performance of this business rested. This man was brought up by one Master Henry Sidney, a noble young gentleman and very much beloved of King Edward." The master of Chancellor's ship was Stephen Burrough, * Hakluyt, vol. i. p. 445. 188 afterwards Chief Pilot of England, and of high rank in the navy. There was, also, on board his ship, apparently as a common seaman, William Burrows,* afterwards Comptroller of the Navy and autfior of a work on navigation, and who in after years conducted a squadron to the same quarter.f thur Pet, also, whose name is associated with a subsequent voyage, was in the same ship.J ,* Some obscurity has been occasioned by confounding this memorable enterprise with another, entirely distinct and to a different quarter. Thus there is found in Strype the follow ing passage: "In this month of May did the King grant letters of commendation, or safe con duct, for the three ships that were enterprising that noble, adventure of seeking for a passage into the Eastern parts of the world, through the unknown and dan gerous seas of the North. Of this expedition Sebastian Gabato, an excellent mari ner of Bristow, but of Italian parentage, was a great mover, to whom the King, as a gratuity, had given 200 pounds. For this voyage, in February, last, the King lent two ships, the Primrose and the Moon, a pinnace, to Barns, Lord Maior of London, Garrett, one of the Sheriffs, York and Windham, adventurers, binding themselves to deliver to the King two ships of the like burden, and good condition, in Mid* summer, anno 1554. Sir Hugh Willoughby, a brave knight, was the chief Cap tain in this enterprise : to whom the King granted a passport to go beyond the seas, with four servants, forty pounds in money, his chain, &c," Campbell (Lives of the Admirals, vol. i. p. 319) says, " The accounts we have of this matter differ widely; but as I observe there is a variation in the dates of a whole year, so I am apt to believe, that there must have been two distinct undertakings; one under the immediate protection of the court which did not take effect; and the other by a joint stock of the merchants, which did, Of the first, because it is little taken notice of, I will speak particularly here; for the other will cpme in properly in my account of Sir Hugh Willoughby. When, therefore, this matter was first proposed, the King lent two ships, the Primrose and the Moon, to Barnes, Lord Mayor of London, Mr Garret, one of the Sheriffs, and Mr York, and Mr Wyndham, two of the adventurers, giving bond to the King to deliver two ships of like burden, and in as good condition, at Midsommer, 1554." Thus has the Maritime History of England been written! The vessels in question made part of the Expedition to Guinea^ * Hakluyt, vol. i. p. 233 t Ibid. vol. i.p. 401. * Ibid. vol. i. p. 233- Historical Memorials, vol. ii. p. 402. 189 of which an account was given, at length, by Richard Eden (Decades, fol. 345). " In the yeare of cure Lorde MLEQ". the XII day of August, sayled from Porche- mouth two goodly shyppes the Primrose and the Lion, with a Pynnesse cauled the Moon, being all well furnysshed," &c. It seems that the enterprise was frustrated by the miscon duct of " Captayne Wyndham." The persons spoken of as having given bond to the King, were members of the com pany of merchant adventurers.* The expedition to Guinea, thus obscured by Strype, Campbell, and succeeding writers, is that of which Eden, against the remonstrances of his Pub lishers, inserted an account, consenting to swell his volume, " that sum memorie thereof might remayne to our posteritie, if eyther iniquitie of tyme, consumynge all things, or igno rance creepy ng in by barbarousness and contempte of know ledge should hereafter bury in oblivion so worthy attempts!" (fol. 343.) * Hakluyt, vol. i. p. 269. 190 CHAP XXX. INSTRUCTIONS FOR SIR HUGH WILLOUGHBY. THE instructions prepared by Cabot for tbe government of this Expedition, have been justly regarded as a model, and as reflecting the highest credit on his sagacity, good sense, and comprehensive knowledge. They relate not only to the conduct to be observed in reference to the great object in view, but descend to minute suggestions, drawn from his long experience, for the interior arrangements and discipline. They are called " Ordinances, Instructions, and Advertise ments of, and for the direction of the intended voyage for Cathay, compiled, made, and delivered by the right worship ful M. Sebastian Cabota, Esq. Governour of the Mysterie and Companie of the Merchants Adventurers for the discoverie of Regions, Dominions, Islands, and places unknowen, the 9th day of May, in the yere of our Lord God 1553, and in the 7th yere of the reigne of our most dread sovereigne Lord, Edward VI., by the grace of God, King of England, France, and Ireland, defender of the faith and of the Church of England and Ireland, in earth supreme head."* They were made up in the form of a Book which was or dered to be publicly read once every week, " to the intent that every man may the better remember his oath, conscience, duty and charge." These instructions are too voluminous to be here introduced, but a few extracts, while they indicate the cast of Cabot's mind, must fill us with renewed regret that all the records of such a man's own labours should have been unfortunately lost to us: * Hakluyt, vol. i. p, 226. 191 " 7. Item, that the merchants, and other skilftd persons In writing shall daily arrite, describe, and put in memorie the navigation of each day and night, with the points, and observations of the lands, tides, elements, altitude of the sunne, course of the moon and starres, and the same so noted by the order of the Master and Pilot of every ship to be put in writing, the Captaine-Generall assembling the mas ters together once every weeke (if winde and weather shall serve) to conferre all the observations, and notes of the said ships, to the intent it may appeare wherein the notes do agree, and wherein they dissent, andtipon good debatement, delibera tion, and conclusion determined, to put the same into a common leger, to remain of record for the company: the like order to be kept in proportioning of the Gardes, Astrolabes, and other instruments prepared for the voyage, at the charge of the Companie."* " 27. Item, the names of the people of every Island, are to be taken in writing, with the commodities and incommodities of the same, their natures, qualities, and dispositions, the site of the same, and what things they are most desirous of, and what commodities they will most willingly depart with, and what metals they have in fails, mountains, streames, or rivers, in, or under the earth.'f Attention to moral and religious duties is strictly enjoined. " 12. Item, that no blaspheming of God, or detestable swearing be used in any ship, nor communication of ribaldrie, filthy tales, or ungodly talke to be suffered in the company of any ship, neither dicing, tabling, nor other divelish games to be frequented, whereby ensueth not onely povertie to the placers, but also strife, vari ance, brauling, fighting, and oftentimes murther, to the utter destruction of the parties, and provoking of God's most just wrath, and sworde of vengeance. These* and all such like pestilences, and contagions of vices, and sinnes to be eschewed, and the offenders once monished, and not reforming, to be punished at the discre tion of the captaine and masters, as appertaineth."t ** 13. Item, that morning and evening prayer, with other common services ap pointed by the King's Majestic, and lawes of this realme, to be read and saide in every ship daily by the minister in the admirall, and the mar-chant or some other person learned in other ships, and the Bible or paraphrases to be read devoutly and Christianly to God's honour, and for bis grace to be obtained, and had by hum ble and heartie praier of the navigants accordingly."^ There is much good sense in the following hints : "22. Item, not to disclose to any nation the state of our religion, but to passe it over in silence, without any declaration of it, seeming to bear with such laws and rights as the place hath where you shall arrive."fl " 23. Item, for as much as our people and shippe may appear unto them strange and wonderous, and theirs also to ours; it is to be considered, how they may be used, learning much of their natures and dispositions, by some one such person, as you may first either allure, or take to be brought aboard your ships, and there to * Hakluyt, vol. i. p. 226. f Ibid, p. 228. t Ibid. vol. i. p. 227. $ Ibid. | Ibid. vol. i. p. 228. 192 learn as you may, without violence orforce t and no woman to be tempted, or intreated to incontinence, or dishonestie."* " 26. Item, every nation and region is to be considered advisedly, and not to provoke them by any disdaine, laughing, contempt, or such like, but to use them with prudent circumspection, with all gentlenes, and curtesie, and not to tarry long in one place, until! you shall have attained the most worthy place that may be found in such sort as you may returne with victuals sufficient, prosperously."! The difficulties experienced, from timidity and incredulity, are apparent from a passage of the 32d item, in which he speaks of the obstacles which had " ministered matter of sus picion in some heads, that this voyage could not succeed for the extremitie of the North Pole, lacke of passage, and such like, which have caused wavering minds, and doubtful heads, not only to withdraw themselves from the adventure, of this voyage, but also dissuaded others from the same, the certainte whereof, when you shall have tried by experience, &c."f * Hakluyt, vol. i. p. 228. fib. J Ibid. vol. i.jj. 22.9. 193 CHAP. XXXI. THE EXPEDITION DROPS DOWN TO GREENWICH SALUTES ANIMATING SCENE PROCEED TO SEA VESSELS SEPARATED FATE OF SIR HUGH WILLOUGHBY CHANCELLOR REACHES WARDHOUSE EARNESTLY DIS SUADED FROM PROCEEDING FURTHER HIS GALLANT RESOLUTION CONFIDENCE OF THE CREW IN HIM REACHES ARCHANGEL EXCEL LENT EFFECT OF OBSERVING CABOT*S INSTRUCTIONS AS TO DEPORT MENT TOWARDS THE NATIVES SUCCESS OF CHANCELLOR. ON the 20th May, the squadron, consisting of three ships, dropped down to Greenwich : " The greater Shippes are towed downe with boates, and oares, and the Mari ners being all apparelled in Watchet or skie-coloured cloth, rowed amaine, and made way with diligence. And being come neere to Greenewich (where the Court then lay), presently upon the newes thereof, the Courtiers came running out, and the common people flockt together, standing very thicke upon the shoare: the privie Counsel, they lookt out at the windowes of the Court, and the rest ranne up to the toppes of the towers: the shippes hereupon discharge their Ordinance, amf shoot off their pieces after the manner of warre, and of the sea, insomuch that the tops of the hilles sounded therewith; the valleys and the waters gave an Eccho, and the Mariners, they shouted in such sort, that the skie rang againe with the noyse thereof One stood in the poope of the ship, and by his gesture bids farewell to his friends in the best manner hee could. Another walkes upon the hatches, another climbes the shrowds, another stands upon the maine yard, and another in the top of the shippe. To be short, it was a very triumph (after a sort) in alLrespects to the beholders. But (alas) the good King Edward (in re spect of whom principally all this was prepared) hee only by reason of his sick- nesse was absent from this shewe, and not lung after the departure of these Ships, the lamentable and most sorrowful accident of his death followed."* There was some delay at Harwich ; " yet at the last with a good winde they hoysted up sayle, and committed themselves to the sea, giving their last adieu to their native countrey, which they knew not whether they should ever re- turne to see againe or not. Many of them looked oftentimes Hakluyt, vol. i. p. 245 194 backe, and could not refraine from teares, considering into what hazards they were to fall, and what uncertainties of the sea they were to make triall of."* Chancellor himself was moved. "His natural and fatherly affection, also, somewhat troubled him, for he left behinde him two little sonnes, which were in the case of orphanes if he spedde not well."f After touching at Rost Island, and at a group called the Cross of Islands, it was agreed that in the event of a separa tion the ships should rendezvous at the Castle of Wardhouse in Norway. On the very day of the council at which this arrangement was made a furious tempest arose that dispersed the vessels. The story of the gallant Chief of the Expedition is brief but horrible. Failing to make the contemplated progress to the eastward, it was resolved to winter in Lapland, and ar rangements for that purpose were commenced on the 18th September. The rigour of the climate proved fatal to all. The two ships were long afterwards discovered with no living thing on board. A Journal was found of the incidents of the voyage, and a Will of Gabriel Willoughby, attested by Sir Hugh, dated as late as January, 1554. Over the frightful scenes witnessed by him who was reserved as the last victim of the elements "there is thrown, like a pall, impenetrable darkness. As he stiffened into death, by the side of his un- buried messmates, he saw the savage region yielded back, without further struggle, to the " unknown and also wonder ful" wild beasts whose fearful numbers about the ships are noted in the last entry of the Journal.^ Chancellor was more fortunate. He reached Wardhouse in safety, and having remained there several days resolved to proceed, notwithstanding the disheartening representations made to him. * Hakluyt, vol. i. p. 245. fib. $ Hakluyt, vol. i. p. 239. The Will found on board witnessed by Sir Hugh Willoughby was in the possession of Purchas (Pilgrims, vol. iii. p. 463) 195 "Remaining stedfast and immutable in hia first resolution, he determined either to bring that to passe which was intended or els to die the death.* * And as for them which were with Master Chanceler in his Shippe, although they had great cause of discomfort by the losse of their companie (whom the fore- said tempest had separated from them) and were not a little troubled with cogita tions and perturbations of minde, in respect of their doubtful course : yet notwith standing, they were of such consent and agreement of minde with Master Chanceler, that they were resolute, and prepared under his direction and government, to make proofe and triall of all adventures, without all feare or mistrust of future dangers. Which constancie of minde in all the companie did exceedingly increase their Cap tain's carefulnesse."f In this resolute spirit he again put to sea. " Master Chan celer held on his course towards that unknown part of the world, and sailed so farre, that he came at last to the place where he found no night at all, hut a continuall light and hrightnesse of the sunne shining clearly upon the huge and mightie sea. And having the benefite of this perpetuall light for certaine dayes, at the length it pleased God to bring them into a certaine great bay, which was one hundreth miles or thereabout over. Whereinto they entered somewhat farre and cast anchor." He had now reached the Bay of St Nicholas. Landing near Archangel, then only a castle, there becomes visible the influence of Cabot's injunction, as to gentleness of deportment towards the natives and its happy result. ** And looking every way about them it happened that they espied a farre off a certain fisher boate which Master Chancellor, accompanied with a fewe of his men, went towards to commune with the fishermen that were in it, and to knowe of them what countrey it was, and what people, and of what maner of living they were : but they being amazed with the strange greatnesse of hisr shippe (for in those parts before that time they had never seen the like) beganne presently to avoyde and to flee : but hee still following them at last overtooke them, and being come to them, they pray for the good fortune, and prosperous successe of the Serchthrift, our Pinnesse, And then at the signe of the Christo pher, he and his friends banketted, and made m.e, and them that were in the com pany great cheere : and/or very joy that he had to see the towardness of our intended discovery, he entered into the dance himselfe, amongst the rest of the young and lusty company! which being ended, hee and his friends departed most gently, commending us to the Governance of Almighty God." A gloom now overspreads the history of Cabot, and we ap proach the closing scenes of his life with a painful conviction that they exhibit a signal instance of ingratitude and bad faith. The untimely death of Edward VI. while it operated as a severe check on the advancing commercial prosperity of Eng land, was no less inauspicious to the personal fortunes of him who had given the first great impulse. The generosity 'of the youthful monarch, his ingenious and enterprising spirit, -^-and his fondness for the studies and inquiries connected with sea affairs are in melancholy contrast with the close and sullen 'bigotry of Mary. It would form no recommendation to her that Cabot had been a personal favourite with a brother whom she regarded as a heretic and as her own persecutor. With her husband he was still less likely to find favour. Jealous of the growing commerce and maritime enterprise of England, Philip saw in Sebastian Cabot the man who had left his father's service, had refused peremptorily to return, and who was now imparting to others the benefit of his vast ex perience and accumulated stores of knowledge. Edward died on the 6 July, 1553. On the 27 November, 1555, the pension to Cabot was renewed (Rymer, Fcedera, vol. XV. p. 427), but there is no clause having a retrospective character, to cover the intervening period, such as would be necessary if, as the fact of renewal implies, the pension made payable for life by the king and his successors was deemed to expire on the death of the reigning monarch. 215 The most alarming indication of the complete change in the aspect of affairs is the fact that the Stilyard merchants, by the influence of Charles V., through the marriage of his son with Mary, were enabled to obtain relief from the Act of the late King. "This/' says Rapin, "was the first fruit of the Queen's alliance with the Emperor." Their insolent confidence i& strikingly apparent in one Doc ument, which shews, at the same time, their knowledge of Philip's brutal disregard of the feelings of his wife. " At an assembly of the Hanses at Lubeck, art Edict was published against all Englishmen t forbidding all trade or commerce with them, and staying the carrying out of Come, which was provided for the service and necessitie of the Realme : yet for all these indignities, the said Queene wag contented that Commissaries on both parts should meet in England, and agree upon, and set downe a certaine and immutable manner of Trade to beheld, and observed on both sides : but the Hanses were so farre from accepting of this gracious offer, that they wholly refused it, as by a Petition of theirs exhibited to King Philip, the third of June 1557 appeareth, wherein they declare the cause of that their refusall to bee, ibrthat they coulde not have in this Realme anie other iudges of their cause, but such as were suspected, not sparing or excepting the Queene herself e of whose good wUl and favour they had received so often experience and triall.*" A crisis approaches. Philip reached London on the 20th May, 1557, and the formal declaration of war against France took place immediately after, f The period was one of great pecuniary embarrassment with Mary, and she saw the dread ed necessity approaching for a demand on Parliament of money to enable her to promote the schemes of her husband, f We recall, at such a moment, with alarm, the almost incredible treatise of Commerce by Wheeler, Ed. of 1601, p. 97. j- "Philip had come to London in order to support his partizans ; and he told the Queen, that if he were not gratified in so reasonable a request, he never more would set foot in England. This declaration extremely heightened her zeal for promoting his interests, and overcoming the inflexibility of her Council." Hume, anno 1557. $ "Any considerable supplies could scarcely be expected from Parliament, considering the present disposition of the nation ; and as the war wpuld sensibly diminish that branch arising from the customs, the finances, it was foreseen, would fall short even of the ordinary charges of government ; and must still more prove unequal to the expenses of war. But though the Queen owed great arrears to all her servants, besides the loans extorted from the subjects, these considerations had no influence with her." Ib. 216 baseness and ingratitude of this man, who, the year before, had withheld from his father, Charles V., the paltry pittance reserved on surrendering a mighty e;mpire,* * On the 27th May, 1557, Cabot resigned his pension, f On the 29th, a new grant is made, but in a form essentially dif ferent.:): It is no longer to him exclusively, but jointly with William Worthington; "eidem Sebastianb et dilecto servienti nostro Willielmo Worthington." On the face of this transaction Cabot is cheated of one-half of the sum which had been granted to him for life. This was done, no doubt, on the pretence that age prevented an effi cient discharge of his duties, forgetting that the very nature of the grant for life had indulgent reference to such a contin gency, and that Cabot by refusing to quit England had for feited his pension from the Emperor. That Worthington probably a favourite of that dark hour was thus provided for on pretence of aiding in the discharge of Cabot's functions seems placed beyond doubt by evidence found in Hakluyt. The dedication of the first volume of the greater work to the Lord High Admiral of England contains these remarkable expressions : "King Edward VI., that Prince of Peerless hope, with the advice of his sage and prudent counsel, before he entered into IheNbrthJEastern discovery, advanced the worthy and excellent Sebastian Cabotato be Grand Pilot of England, allowing him a most bountiful! Pension of 166 by the year, during his life, as appeareth in his letters Patent, which are to be seen in the third part of my work. And if God had granted him longer life, I doubt not but as he dealt most royally in establish. ing that office of Pilot Major, (which not long after to the great hindrance of the common-wealth, was miserably turned to other private uses') so his Princely Majesty would have showed himself no niggard in erecting, &c. &c." Robertson's Charles V. anno 1556. " But though he might have soon learned to view with unconcern the levity of his subjects, or to have despised their neglect, he was more deeply afflicted with the ingratitude of his Son, who, forgetting al ready how much he owed to his father's bounty, obliged him to remain some weeks at Burgos, before he paid him the first moiety of that small Pension^ which was all that he had reserved of so many kingdoms. As without this sum Charles could not dismiss his domestics with such rewards as their services merited, or his gen erosity had destined for them, he could not help expressing both surprise and dis satisfaction." t Rymer, vol. xv. p. 427. *. Ib. p. 466. 217 The high functionary thus addressed was then in the ser vice of Queen Elizabeth. The gross abuse, therefore, so in dignantly denounced has no reference, we may be assured, to her, and we know that amongst the early acts of her reign was the appointment of Stephen Burrough to the office in question. The allusion, therefore, is to some dark tale of perversion between the death of Edward in 1553 and the ac cession of Elizabeth in 1558, and we can have little difficulty in coupling it with this mark of royal bounty at the expense of Cabot. The allusion was, doubtless, well understood by the person addressed, for his father, then Lord High Admiral of England, is named, as we have seen, in the Charter of the Merchant Adventurers, (at the head of whom Cabot is placed) as one of the associates who had fitted out the vessels to prosecute discoveries in the North, North -West, and North-East.* Hakluyt alludes to this circumstance in his Dedication to the son. We look round with some interest for information as to William Worthington. The only notice of him discovered is in a passage of Strype's Historical Memorials (vol. it p. 506), where amongst the Acts of Edward VI. the youthful monarch is found, with an easy liberality, forgiving him a large debt on his allegation that a servant had run away with the money. " A Pardon granted to William Worthington, being indebted to the King for and concerning the office of Bailiff and Collector of the Rents and Revenues of all the Manors, Messuages, Lands, Tenements, and Hereditaments within the City of London, and county of Middlesex, which did belong to Colleges, Guilds, Frater nities, or Free Chappels, in the sum of 392 pounds 10 shillings 3 pence, as upon the foot of his account, made by the said William before Thomas Mildmay auditor of the said Revenues, manifestly it doth appear: In consideration of his service both in France and Scotland, and also his daily service and attendance, being one of the ordinary Gentlemen and Pensioners; and for that the Debt grew by the unfaithful ness of his servant, who ran away with the same. Granted in March, but the Patent signed in April." * See the Charter in Hakluyt, vol. i. p. 268. 2 C 218 It will be remembered* that in Hakluyt's earliest work, published in 1582, he speaks of all Cabot's Maps and Dis courses written with his own hand as then in the possession of William Worthington. The facts disclosed may, perhaps, assist to Account for their disappearance. It is obvious that such documents would be sebured, at any price, by the Span ish Court, at the period of Hakluyt's publication, when Eng lish enterprise was scattering dismay amongst the Spanish possessions of America. The work of Hakluyt (six years be fore the Armada) showed where they were tabe found. The depositary of them was the very man who had been the object of Philip's bounty during his brief influence in England. Were they not bought up? There can be .now only a con jecture on the subject, yet it, seems to gather strength the more it i& reflected on., Suspicion may even go back farther, and suggest that a main object in associating this man with Cabot was to enable him to get possession of the papers that they might he de stroyed or sent to Spain. The fact that Worthington had received them was probably too well known to be denied by him ; and his remark to Hakluyt may have been a mere mode of evading that person's prying curiosity. The same alarm which dictated the demand on Edward VI. for the return of Cabot would lead Philip to seize^ with eagerness, an opportu nity of getting hold of these documents, so that the author's dreaded knowledge might expire with himself. Of one thing we may feel assured. Hakluyt^ who is found attaching so much importance to an " Extract" from one of Cabot's Alaps, was not turned aside from efforts to get a sight of this precious Collection, but by repeated and peremptory refusals, for which, if it really remained in Worthington's hands, there occurs no adequate motive. The language of the Dedication seems to betray something^of the sharpness of a personal pique. Sixty-one years had now elapsed since the date of the first * See p. 40. 219 commission from Henry VII. to Sebastian Cabot, and the pow ers of nature must have been absolutely wearied out. We lose sight of him after the Jate mortifying incident ; but the faithful and kind-hearted Richard Eden beckons us, with something of awe, to see him die. That excellent person attended him in his last moments,* and furnishes a touching proof of the strength of the Ruling Passion. Cabot spoke flightily, " on his death bed," about a* divine revelation to him of a new and infallible method of Finding the Longitude which he w&s not permitted to disclose to any mortal. His pious friend grieves that " the good old man," as he is affec tionately called, had not yet, " even in the article of death, shaken off all worldlie vaine glorie." When we remember the earnest religious feeling exhibited in the Instructions to Sir Hugh Willoughby, and which formed so decided a feature of Cabot's character, it is impossible to conceive a stronger proof of the influence of long cherished habits of thought, than that his decaying faculties, at this awful moment^ were yet entangled with the problem which continues to this day to vex, and elude, the human intellect. The Dying Seaman was again, in imagination, on that beloved Ocean over whose billows his intrepid and adventurous youth had opened a path way, and whose mysteries had occupied him longer than the allotted span of ordinary life* The date of his death is not known, nor, except presumptively, the place where it oc curred. From the presence of Eden we may infer that he died in London. It is not knovvn where his Remains were deposited. The claims of England in the new world have been uniformly, and justly, rested on his discoveries. Pro posals of colonization wete urged, on the clearness of the Title thus acquired and the shame of abandoning it, The See the Epistle Dedicatory to " A very necessarle and profitable book con cerning- Navigation compiled in Latin by Joannes Taisnenis, a publike Professor in Rome, Ferraria and and other Universities in Italic, of the Mathematicalles named a Treatise of Continual Motions. Translated into English .by Richard Eden, Im printed at London by Richard Jugge." There is a copy of the work in the King's Library, British Museum (title in Catalogue, Eden"). 220 English language would probably be spoken in no part of America but for Sebastian Cabot. The Commerce of Eng land and her Navy are admitted -to have been deeply incal culably his debtors. Yet there is reason to fear that in his extreme age the allowance which had been solemnly granted to him for life was fraudulently broken in upon. His birth place we have seen denied. His fame has been obscured by English writers, and every vile calumny against him eagerly adopted and circulated. All his own Maps and Discourses " drawn and written by himself' 7 which it was hoped might come out in print, " because so worthy monuments should not be buried in perpetual oblivion/ 7 have been buried in per petual oblivion. He gave a Continent to England: yet no one can point to the few feet of earth she has allowed him ID return ! BOOK II. CHAP. I. VOYAGES SUBSEQUENT TO THE DISCOVERY BY OABOT PATENT OF 19TH MARCH 1501, NOW FIRST PUBLISHED, IN FAVOUR OF THREE MERCHANTS OF BRISTOL AND THREE PORTUGUESE NATIVES BROUGHT TO ENGLAND AND EXHIBITED AT COURT ERRONEOUS REFERENCE OF THIS INCIDENT TO CABOT HAKLUYT'S PERVERSION SECOND PATENT 9TH DECEMBER 1 502 DR ROBERTSON'S MISCONCEPTIONS PROBABLE REASONS FOR THE ABANDONMENT OF THE ENTERPRISE. IT is now proposed to pass in review the efforts which have been made at different periods, and under various auspices, to follow up the project of Cabot, so far as may be necessary to exhibit the pervading influence of the original enterprise. This part of the subject has in it little of an attractive, or popular, character 5 yet the close and minute inquiry which it involves will, it is hoped, be sufficiently relieved by its high purpose of rendering an act of tardy justice- to the fame of this great seaman. The same ignorance, or malevolence, which has so long obscured the evidence of what he himself achieved, has been even yet more successful in effecting its object by an absurd exaggeration of the merit of subsequent navigators. Attention is naturally turned, in the first place, to the 222 country in which the scheme had its origin 5 and here we re cognize distinctly the quickening impulse of its partial suc cess, though rendered unavailing by accidental causes. The page of Eord Bacon which states the public exhibition by Cabot, on his return, of a " Card," showing his progress to 67 and-a-half, apprises us that " again in the sixteenth year of his reign, and likewise in the eighteenth, the King granted new commissions for the discovery, and investing of unknown lands." Singular as it may appear, the first of these interesting and curious documents has never yet been made public, and the reference to it in a subsequent paper printed by Rymer (vol. xiii. p. 42), has a mistake as to the date. After a tedious search at the Rolls Chapel, it has at length been discovered, and though, from unpardonable carelessness, a part of it has become illegible, yet no material portion is lost. It was granted during the brief Chancellorship of the Bishop of Salisbury, and bears date 19th March, in the 16th year of Henry VII. (19th March 1501), and is in favour of Richard Warde, Thomas Jlshehurst, and John Thomas, "Merchants of the Towne of Brystowe/' and John Fernandus, Francis Fernandus, and John Gunsolus, "borne in the Isle of Sur- rys, under the obeisance of the Kyng of Portugale." The following are its leading provisions. Authority is given to these persons, their heirs, factors and deputies, to sail to and explore, at their own expense, all Islands, Countries, regions, and provinces whatever, in the Eastern, Western, Southern, and Northern Seas heretofore unknown to Christians, and to set up the Royal Banner in such places as they may discover^ and to subdue and take possession of the same in the name of the King of England. They are permitted to employ as many vessels as they may think proper, and of any burden. The King's subjects, male and female, are permitted to go to and inhabit the regions which may be discovered, to take with them their vessels, servants, and property of every de- 223 scription, and to dwell there under the protection and gov ernment of the patentees, who are empowered to frame Laws and to enforce their execution. Theft, homicide, robbery, and violation of the female natives of the newly-discovered countries, are specially recited as offences to be provided against. The exclusive privilege of trading to the newly-discovered countries is secured to the Patentees for ten years ; and they may import thence gold, silver, precious stones, and all other products. In special consideration of the great expense attending the enterprise, they are authorised to import for the term of four years in one vessel of any burden, all articles duty-free ; but a proviso is eagerly added that this shall not affect the claim to duties on articles imported in other vessels. All persons presuming to visit the newly-discovered regions without permission of the Patentees, even though, subjects of a power in friendship and alliance with Erigland, may be treated as enemies and expelled, or imprisoned and punished at the discretion of the Patentees. They may appoint deputies for the government of all cities, towns, and other places, in the countries discovered. The office of King's Admiral in those regions is conferred on them, and the survivors and survivor of them. Lands are to be held by them, their heirs and assigns, by fealty only, without further or other claim or demand on the part of the King or his heirs. The next clause forbids any interference with the Patentees by any foreigner under any grant before made, or which should afterwards be made, under the Great Seal. The writing on the original parchment is then carefully erased from a considerable space which had been occupied, as we may conjecture, with the case of Cabot. The three Portuguese are made denizens ; yet even this act of grace is coupled with a qualification strikingly charac teristic of the Monarch whose sign manual is affixed to the instrument. It is provided that they shall continue liable to 224 pay duties as aliens on all merchandise exported or im ported!* The subsequent Patent, bears date 9th December, in the eighteenth year of Henry VII. that is 9th December, 1502, and is found in Rymer (vol. xiii. p. 37), Of the original Patentees, the names of Richard Warde, John Thomas, and John Fernandus are dropped, and to those retained (Thomas Ashehurst, John Gunsolus and Francis Fernandus) is now added Hugh Elliott. The powers given to these four per sons are essentially the same with those conferred on the for mer six ; and in matters of detail a temper evidently less churlish is displayed. The exclusive right of trade to the new regions is extended to a period of forty years, and the exemption from duty on merchandise imported in one vessel, of whatever burden, to fifteen years ; and before the instru ment closes, the additional privilege is given of importation, duty free, for five years, in one other vessel of 120 tons. The last indulgence is seemingly wrung from the King, after a par tial preparation of the instrument. The ungracious proviso which accompanied the original denization is also withdrawn, and they are to pay no higher duties than natural- born subjects. It is specially provided that any discoveries made by the new patentees shall not be for the benefit of the former with out an express agreement to that effect. At this late period we cannot pretend to ascertain, with certainty, what was done under these Patents which evidently look to an extensive scheme of colonization. That one voyage at least was made, may be inferred from various circumstances. The provisions of the second Patent, of the 9th December 1502, have reference to the discovery of regions " not before discovered by the King's subjects under authority from the Great Seal" ("quse antehac ab aliis subditis nostris, aut ab aliquibus h&redum et successorum suorum, potestatem, per * As this document has not heretofore been made public, it is given at large in the Appendix (D.)- 225 alias Literas Patentes sub Magno Sigillo Nostro in ea parte a Nobis habentibus, reperta, inventa, investigata et recuperate non fuerunt"). No such expressions are found in the Patent of 19th March, 1501, the reference there being only to a former authority to a foreigner (extraneus), that is, the Ve netian, John Cabot. We may therefore fairly infer, that the allusion is to some intermediate discovery by the Patentees of the 19th March, 1501, two of whom, Richard Warde and John Thomas, merchants of Bristol, are omitted in the second Patent. The presumption is further strengthened by the following passage in S tow's Annals, under the year 1502 " This year were brought unto the King three men taken in the Newfound Ilandes by 'Sebastian Gabato before named in anno 1498 ; these men were clothed in beast skins and did eate raw flesh, but spake such a language as no man could understand them, of the which three men two of them were seen in the King's Court at Westminster two years after clothed like Englishmen and could not be dis cerned from Englishmen/' Stow quotes as his authority Robert Fabyan, though, as has been remarked on a former occasion, no such passage is to be found in the printed work of that Annalist. The coupling of Cabot's name here with the year 1498, may, perhaps, be supposed to refer merely to what had been said of him before, as the finder of the new region, and to be a mode of designating a country which had, as yet, received no familiar appellation. One obvious consideration arises on the face of the account to negative the idea that the savages exhibited in 1502, had been brought off by him in 1498. The author speaks, it will be seen, of the complete change in their aspect and apparel, after a lapse of two years. Now had they arrived with Cabot, they must have been in England four years prior to the exhibition. Where had they been kept in the intermediate period, and would they not, long before, have cast their skins and lost something of the savageness which afterwards disappeared so rapidly? To suppose that they had been recently "brought unto the King" by Cabot is/ against probability, when, while nothing is found with regard to him, the Records show a treaty "with Henry VII. by others^ 2 D 226 executed a sufficient time before to fall in with this exhibition. These considerations would countervail even a positive state ment, had one been made, by the old Annalist who, in a me morandum as to the strange sight he had witnessed at West minster, would naturally refer it, without minute inquiry, to the discovery and the person he had before named. It is satisfactory to disengage Cabot from the cruel trick of bring ing off the aborigines; this was plainly the first tribute to popular wonder from the New World. They had evidently just arrived, and were doubtless brought up to London to ex cite general curiosity and interest as to the new region pre paratory to an effort which was successfully made in Decem ber, to obtain a relaxation of the terms of the original Patent. We may remark further, aside from the improbability of the three Portuguese remaining idle in England for nearly two years, that they would have come with an ill grace to ask for a new Patent had they made no experiment to ascertain how far the original one might be turned to account. Doubtless the modification was urged on the ground that the country was found, on examination, to offer none of the rich commod ities specially referred to in the first patent, neither gold, silver, nor precious stones, and that it was impossible to ex pect, under the original terms, even a reimbursement of the expense incurred. We require some such explanation of the sudden extension from ten to forty years of the privilege of exclusive traffic. Another instance of treachery on the part of Hakluyt is here to be noted, which may show how undeserving he is of confidence. The early part of the year 1502 falls within the seventeenth of Henry VII.* On turning to Hakluyt's origi nal work, published in 1582, there will be found this same passage of Fabyan, as derived from " John Stowe Citizen a The following entries in the Account of the Privy Purse Expenses of Henry VII. are obviously to be connected with these Patents: 7 January 1502 To men of Bristol that found Th' Isle 5 "30 September 1502 To the Merchants of Bristol that have bene in the Newe founde Launde . 20." 227 diligent searcher and preserver of Antiquities," and he there, with the recent communication befdre him, actually states the seventeenth year of Henry VII. as the date of this exhibition of savages. But when he came to publish his larger, and more ambitious, work, h% seems to have paused over the several scraps of information he had collected, and which appeared so little to harmonise. There is no evidence, it may be re marked, that he had any knowledge of the two Patents to the Bristol Merchants and the Portuguese. He thought it, then, unaccountable how Cabot should be found, at so late a period, exhibiting savages evidently just from the woods. He deter mined, therefore, to set the matter right, and the "seven teenth" year of his original work is actually converted into " fourteenth" so as to correspond with the date of Cabot's voyage. In the work of 1582, the passage is headed "Of three savage men which he brought home and presented unto the King in the XVII yeere of his raigne," but in 1600, (vol. iii, p. 9) "Of three savages which Cabot brought home and presented unto the King in the fourteenth yeare of his raigne mentioned by the foresaid Robert Fabian." Thus the names of Stowe and Fabyan, cited, in 1582, for the statement then made, are retained to sanction his own perversion eighteen years after ! Whatever may have been the result of these Commissions, a mere glance at their dates, and contents, will suffice to show how idle are the speculations by which respectable writers have sought to account for what they term the apathy of Henry VII. The following passage from Dr Robertson's History of America may serve as a specimen : "But by the time that Cabot returned to England, he found both the state>of affairs and the King's inclination unfavourable to any scheme, the execution of which would have required tranquillity and leisure. Henry was involved in a War with Scotland* and his Kingdom was not yet fully composed after the commotion excited by a formidable insurrection of his own subjects in the West An Ambassador from Ferdinand of Arragon was then in London: and as Henry set a high value upon the friendship of that Monarch, for whose character he professed much admiration, perhaps from its similarity to his own, and was endeavouring to strengthen their union \>y negotiating the marriage which afterwards took place between his eldest Son and the Princess Catharine, he was cautious of giving any offence to a Prince jealous to excess of all his rights. 28 "From the position of the Islands and Continent which Cabot had discovered, it Was evident that they lay within the limits of the ample donative which the bounty of Alexander VI had conferred upon Ferdinand and Isabella. No person, in that age, questioned the validity of a paper grant ; and Ferdinand was not of a temper to relinquish any claim to which he had a shadow of title. Submission to the au thority of the Pope, and deference for an ally whom he courted, seem to have con curred with Henry's own situation; in determining him to abandon a scheme, in which he had engaged with some degree of ardour and expectation. "No attempt towards discovery was made in England during the remainder of his reign ; and Sebastian Cabot, finding no encouragement for his active talents there, entered into the service of Spain." The four Commissions from Henry VII. bear date, respec tively, 5th March 1496^ 3rd February 1598, 19th March 1501, and 9th December 1502. Of these, the second was granted to John Cabot after the close of the war in Scotland, and the putting down of Perkin Warbeck's Insurrection in the West. The others follow at such intervals as show a continu ed patronage of the project, and there is not the slightest evidence of refusal, or even of hesitation, from the considera tions suggested by Dr Robertson. At the very moment when, according to that writer, Henry was influenced by a dread of ecclesiastical censure, and a timid deference to foreign pow ers, he is found conferring under the Great Seal authority to make discoveries and to treat as enemies, and pursue to con dign punishment, all who should presume to visit the countries discovered without permission, even though subjects of a mon arch in alliance with England. As to the suggestion that the enterprise was finally abandoned on account of the contem plated marriage between Prince Arthur and Catherine, not only do we find the dates above-mentioned running over the period of negotiation, but it happens that the last patent (the one in Rymer) is dated seven months after the Prince's death. The indisposition of Henry to give way to arrogant preten sions is abundantly clear. The Patentees are to respect the prior discoveries of Portugal and other countries only where actual possession had been maintained, " in terris prius repertis etin quarum possessions ipsi Principesyaw existunt." Dr Robertson had seen the title of the last Patent, as given by Rymer, but assuredly could not have read it, or he must have struck out the whole of the passage quoted. The reader 229 will smile at the indolent credulity of the following sentence : " If any attempt had been made in consequence of this Patent, it would not have escaped the knowledge of a compiler so in dustrious and inquisitive as Hakluyt." We have just seen, that the writer on whose accuracy and research Dr Robertson' relies so implicitly as to waive any examination for himself, has contrived, by a nefarious perversion, to obscure the very fact in question. The real character of Henry VII. seems to have been that of a thrifty, calculating, man of business. Caring little about the niceties of the point of honour, he was inclined to submit to many slights, and some injustice, rather than go to War, which he shunned as the same prudent personage would, in private life, have deprecated a lawsuit, as a remedy involv ing, necessarily, much trouble and expense, and being, at last, of uncertain issue. He often obtained by negotiation what a more proud and impetuous spirit would have vindicated by the sword. But wherever the obvious interests of the coun try, or of his own coffers, were concerned, he was sturdy, persevering, fearless. The influence of his reign on the com mercial history of England has never been adequately appre ciated, because no one, since the time of Bacon> has taken up the subject in a temper to do him justice. There is nothing in his character to dazzle or excite, and Treaties of Commerce are a poor substitute for Battles to the light reader or brilliant historian. In reference to the projects under consideration, it is plain that Henry did not, for one moment, suffer the Pope's Bull, or the remonstrances of Spain, to interfere with the eager and resolute pursuit of what seemed a profitable speculation. But when he found that the only quarter of the new world which remained unoccupied held out no prospect of speedy or rich returns, and that the prosecution of these enterprises, instead of proving a mine of wealth, only, perhaps, furnished an ap peal to his princely generosity for pecuniary aid, his interest naturally languished.* The Foreigners who had resorted to That an intercourse was kept up for several years with the newly-discovered 230 his Court were obliged tu seek, elsewhere, for Patrons either more ambitious of the mere glory of discovery or more long sighted, in looking patiently to ultimate, though tardy, results. John Gunsolus, is doubtless the " Juan Oonzales, Portugais," whose name appears as a witness in the celebrated trial of the Fiscal with Diego Columbus (Navarette, Viages, torn. iii. p. 553). Of his own fair standing some proof is, perhaps, found in his being called on to testify to the estimation in which Alonzo Pinzon was held by the seamen of that period (Ib. p. 569). He mentions his having sailed with Diego de Lepe, and probably proceeded to England about the date (May, 1500) of the letter of the King and Queen -of Spain to Dorvelos, which Navarette (torn. iii. p. 42) refers to a project on the part of Spain to follow up the discoveries of Cabot. Lepe himself, after his return, is found in the November of the same year at Palos, entangled in some vexatious law pro ceedings (Navarette, torn. iii. p. 80). Repeated reference is found in Herrera to John and Francis Goncalez, but as there are several individuals thus designated it is impossible to know what incidents to refer to the English patentees. region, is apparent from the following entries in the account of the Privy Purse Expenses of Henry VII. ' 17 November, 1503. To one that brought hawkes from the Newfounded Island, 11. " 8 April, 1504. To a preste [priest] that goeth to the new Islande, 2/. 25 August, 1505. To Clays going to Richmount with wylde catts and popyn- gays of the Newfound Island, for his costs, 13s- 4d. " To Portugales [Portuguese] that brought popyngais and catts of the moun- taigne with other stuff to the King's grace, 51." Can it have been that Sebastian Cabot, meanwhile, was attempting to colonize the new region ? The mission of the Priest would seem to countenance the idea of a settlement ; and we might thus account for the long disappearance of our Nav igator, as well as for the language of Thevet (see p. 87 of the present volume). 231 CHAP. II. FIRST VISIT OF COLUMBUS TO TERRA FIRMA ON HIS THIRD VOYAGE AP PRISED BEFORE LEAVING SPAIN OF CABOT S DISCOVERIES PROJECTED EXPEDITION TO THE NORTH FROM SPAIN. IT cannot be supposed that the two great maritime contem poraries of Henry, would regard with indifference the enter prise of Cabot, since the "Card," which that navigator ex hibited on his return, according to Lord Bacon, plainly show ed how little respect was paid to the arrogant meridian line which had received the highest ecclesiastical sanction. The Continent of America was first visited by Columbus in August 1498, in the course of what is called his Third Voy age, on which he sailed 30 May 1498. The bare mention of these dates will establish the impossibility that he could have been ignorant of the great discoveries of Cabot which, com mencing at the point seen on the 24 June 1497, had extended over the "Londe and Isle," recited in the second patent. Not only had the first expedition returned, and the mariners been dispersed in every direction, but a new expedition, with the King at its head, is subsequently planned, and the royal authority, of 3rd February 1498, for its sailing precedes, by nearly four months, the departure of Columbus. To sup pose him ignorant of events so momentous would involve an absurdity which becomes the, more glaring in proportion as the circumstances are considered. The court of Henry VII. was filled with the agents of foreign powers,* through whom the news would not fail to be spread, at once, over Europe. "It grew also from the airs which the princes and states abroad received from their ambassadors and agents here ; which were attending the court in great num ber," &c. "So that they did write over to their superiors in high terms concern ing his wisdom and art of rule ; nay, when they were returned, they did commonly maintain intelligence with him." Bacon's Henry VII. 232 With regard to Spain, as she would feel the deepest interest on the subject, so the circumstances are strongest to show a continued communication between the two countries. The authority in reference to the proposed marriage of Prince Ar thur with Catharine, tears date 3rd January, 1496, and the negotiation runs through the whole of the period to 14th No vember, 1501,- when the ceremony took place. It was by the intervention of the resident Spanish Ambassador, Don Pedro d'Ayola, that the truce between England and Scotland of 30 September, 1497, was brought about, and certain mat ters being left to the arbitrament of Ferdinand and Isabella, Henry's assent to the reference bears date 13 December, 1497.* That d'Ayola, in the active communications going on at such a period, omitted to speak of events so memorable in themselves, and which Spain must have regarded with such especial interest, is a proposition that it is superfluous to combat, A project was soon formed to visit the region actually ex plored by Cabot. Navarette (Viages, torn. iii. p. 77) gives us a letter dated Seville, 6th May 1500, from the king and queen to a certain " Juan Dornelos o Dorvelos," touching a voyage of discovery, and supposes (ib. p. 42) that it had for its object to explore the seas, from the discovery of which Se bastian Cabot had returned (" que el plan dirigiese a renon- cer los mares que acababa de descubrir Sebastian Caboto"). Nothing further appears with regard to it. * Rymer, vol. xii. p. 672. 233 CHAP. III. JfiXPEDITION FROM PORTUGAL CORTEREAL THE WORK ENTITLED rt PAES1 NOVAMENTE RITROVATI," &C. LETTER OF THE VENETIAN AMBASSADOR AT LISBON ELEVEN DAYS AFTER THE RETURN OF CORTEREAL REFER ENCE TO THE PREVIOUS VOYAGE OF CABOT TRINKETS FOUND AMONGST THE NATIVES TRANSLATION OF THE " PAESI," &C. IN 1516. THE voyage from Spain may not have taken place, but In another quarter a more decided result was produced ; and we reach now an enterprise of some celebrity, undertaken di rectly from that country whose adventurers have been traced to England animated with the hope of turning to account the discoveries of Cabot. After the recent shame to Portugal of the rejection of Co lumbus, her enterprising and sagacious monarch could not but take alarm at the departure of his subjects to seek the shel ter, and to advance the glory, of a foreign flag. He had,, moreover, the strongest motives of interest for wishing to an ticipate the efforts of others to reach by a shorter route those regions of which he had heretofore monopolised the lucrative and envied commerce. Nor could the attempt be now deemed a very arduous one. The dispersion of a force of three hun dred men, which, according to Peter Martyr, accompanied Cabot on the voyage spoken of by that historian, would leave not a single sea- port without many mariners eager to describe, and to exaggerate, the wonders of the region they had visited, and anxious, as well as competent, to act as guides in the prosecution of a new enterprise. We are quite prepared, therefore, to believe that the ready assent, and liberal coun tenance, of Emanuel might enable those who enjoyed them to get the start of such of his own subjects as had, perhaps, earlier conceived the project and repaired to England, but 234 whose proposals had there to encounter all the delays pro duced by the cautious and penurious temper of the personage to whom they were addressed. It does not seem probable that Gunsolus and Fernandus would have resorted to England after an expedition for a similar purpose, and likely to cross their path, had been fitted out under the auspices of their own Sovereign. The voluminous treaty between them and Henry VII. may, perhaps, sufficiently explain the apparent tardiness of their subsequent movements. It wears, in every line, a character of anxious and elaborate preparation, and its terms are so harsh and narrow that they could not have been assented to without reluctance, and were found so impractica ble that in the second patent, as we have seen, the necessity of a relaxation is conceded. The conduct of Emanuel pre sents an honourable contrast in every particular. He con tributed largely from his own purse, and all the arrangements were marked by that spirit of liberality which constitutes on such occasions the truest economy. The command of the Expedition was confided to Caspar Cortereal, who had been brought up under the immediate eye of the king while Duke de Beja.* Of its result we happen, very fortunately, to possess an account from a disinterested quarter, remarkably clear and minute. As early as the year 1507 there was published at Vicenza a Collection of Voyages and Travels under the title, "Paesi novamente retrovati et Novo Mondo da Jllberico Vesputio Florentine intitulato," The extreme scarcity of the work may be inferred from the circumstance that Camus, having all the libraries of Paris within his reach, deplores the absence of the original edition (Memoire sur la Collection des Grands et Petits Voyages, &c., p. 5), and Navarette (Colecion de los Viages, &c., torn. iii. p. 187) knew of it only through an ac quaintance who had been in London. Haym (Bibliotheca Italiana o sia notizia de Libri rari Italiani) had not seen the Vicenza publication. In this precious volume is preserved * Damiano Goes Chronico del Rey D. Manoel, cap. Ixvi. 235 a letter from the Venetian ambassador in Portugal to his brothers, written eleven days after the return of Cortereal. The writer's opportunities for obtaining correct information were abundant. He saw the natives whom Cortereal had brought with him heard from the adventurers themselves all the particulars of the voyage and speaks of the hopes and speculations to which it gave rise at the Court to which he was accredited. When it is stated that of this Letter there was a most flagitious perversion in a Latin translation which appeared at Milan the next year, and which has poisoned all the subsequent accounts, the importance will be seen of noting carefully the language of the original. The letter appears, lib. vi. cap. cxxvi. and bears date 19th October 1501, seven months, it may here be remarked, subsequent to Henry VII.'s Patent to the three Portuguese. After a few remarks irrela tive to the expedition, the writer thus continues " Adjr. VIII. del presente arivo qui una de le doe Caravelle quale questo seret issimo Re /anno pastiato mando a discoprire terra verso tramontana Capitaneo Gas- par Corterat : et referissi havere trouato terra ii M. miglia lonzi da qui tra maestro 8c ponente qual mai per avanti fo cognita ad alcun; per la costa de la qua! scorseno forsi mig-lia DC in DCC. ne mai trovoreno fin: per el che credeno che sia terra ferma la qual continue in una altra terra che lano passato, fo discoperta sotto la tra. montana, le qual caravelle non posseno arivar fin la per esser el mare agliazato & infinita copiade neue; Questo in stesso li fa credere la moltitudine de fiumare grossissime che anno trovate la che certo de una Insula none havia maitante & cosi grosse: Dicono che questa terra e mollo populata & le case de li habitant! sonno de alcuni legni longissimi coperte de foravia de pelle de passi. Hanno conduct! qui VII. tra homini 8c femene 8c putti de quelli: & cum laltra Caravella che se aspect* d hora in hora ne vien altri cinquanta." " On the 8th of the present month one of the two Caravels which his most Se rene Majesty dispatched last year on a voyage of discovery to the North, under the command of Caspar Corterat, arrived here, and reports the finding of a country distant hence West and North-West two thousand miles, heretofore quite un known. They proceeded along the coast between six and seven hundred miles with out reaching its termination, from which circumstance they conclude it to be of the mainland connected with another region which last year was discovered in the North, but which the Caravel could not reach on account of the ice and the vast quantity of snow; and they are confirmed in this belief by the multitude of great rivers they found, which certainly could not proceed from an island. They say that this country is very populous, and the dwellings of the inhabitants are constructed with timber of great length and covered with the skins of fishes. They have brought hither of the inhabitants, seven in all, men, women, and children, and in the other Caravel which is looked for every hour there are fifty more." 236 Describing the captives the Ambassador says ' Quest! sono de equal colore, figura, statura, et aspecto, similimi a cingani, ves- titi dc pelle de diversi animali, ma precipue de ludre; de instade voltano el pello i suso, et de in verno el contrario; et queste pelle non sonno cusite insieme in alcun modo, ne couze, ma cosi como -sonno tolte da li animali se le meltono intorno les- palle et braze; et le parte pudibunde Igate cum alcune corde facte de nervi de pesse fortissime. Adeo che pareno homini salvatichi: sono molto vergognosi et mansueti; ma tan to ben facti de brazi 8c gambe & spalle che non se potria dire: Hanno signata la faza in modo de Indian!: chi da vi chi da viii. chi da manco segni. Parlano ma non sonno int<*3i dalcuno: Ampo credo chi sia sta facto parlare in ogni lenguazo possibile: Nela terra loro non hano ferro: ma fanno cortelli de alcune pietre: & similmente ponte de freze: Et quilli anchora hanno porta.de la uno pezo de spada rotta dorata laqual certo par facfa in Italia: uno putto de questi haveva ale orechie dui todini de arzento, che senza dubio pareno sta facti a Venetia: ilche mi fa creder che sia terra ferma, perche non e loco, che mai piu sia andato nave, che se haveria hauto notitia de loro. Hanno grandissima copia de salmoni, Areng'e, StochafiSt & simil pessi: Hanno ctiam gran copia de legnami, & fo sopra tutto de Pint da fare arbori tf anttnnt de nave, per el che questo Serenissimo Re desegna havere grandissimo utile cum dicta terra si per IHegni de nave, che ne haveva de- besogno como per li homini ch seranno per exceUentia da fatiga, & gli meglior schiavi se habia hauti sin hora." " They are of like colour, figure, stature, and aspect, and bear the greatest re semblance to the Gypsies; are clothed with the skins of different animals, but prin cipally the otter; in summer the hairy side is worn outwards, but in winter the reverse; and these skins are not in any way sewed together or fashioned to the body, but just as they come from the animal are wrapped about the shoulders and arms: over the part which modesty directs to be concealed is a covering made of the great sinews of fish. From this description they may appear mere savages, yet they are gentle and have a strong sense of shame and are better made in the arms, legs, and shoulders, than it is possible to describe. They puncture the face, like the Indians, exhibiting six, eight, or even more marks* The language they speak is not understood by any one, though every possible tongue has been tried with them. In this country there is no iron, but they make swords of a kind of stone, and point their arrows with the same material. There has been brought thence a piece of a broken sword which is gilt, and certainly came from Italy. A boy had in his ears two silver plates, which beyond question, from their appearance, were made at Venice, and this induces me to believe that the country is a Continent; for had it been an Island and visited by a vessel we should have heard of it. They have great plenty of salmon, herring, cod, and similar fish; and an abundance of timber, especially the Pine, well adapted far masts andyards t and hence His Serene Majesty contemplates deriving great advantage from the country, not only on account of the timber of which he has occasion, but of the inhabitants who are admirably cal culated for labour, and are the best slaves I have ever seen." When it is known from Lord Bacon (History of Henry" VII.), and the earlier annalists, that the vessels which sailed with Cabot were " fraught with gross and slight wares fit for 237 commerce with barbarous people," we can have no difficulty in deciding whither to refer the ear-rings and the fragments of the showy sword. Aside from the commercial relations of the father with his native city, such articles would naturally, at that period, have been drawn from Venice. It would be absurd to offer arguments to prove that the country further north, which Cortereal could not reach but of which he rightly conjectured he had found a continuation, was that discovered by Cabot. An early French translation of the "Paesi, &c." appeared at Paris, without date, but usually referred by bibliographers to the year 1516. After the quaint old introductory " Sen- suyt," its title is, " Le Nouveau Monde et navigations faictes par Emeric de Vespuee/' It states the year 1500, instead of 1501, as the date of Pasquiligi's letter, and the 7th, instead of the 8th, October as the day on which Cortereal returned; but these errors are unimportant, as the editions in the origi nal are unanimous, and even the fraudulent translation which remains to be noticed does not falsify the date of the letter. Dr Dibdin (Literary Companion, vol. i. p. 370, note) has fallen into a singular mistake with regard to this work, follow ing Meusel, who was in his turn misled (Bibl. Hist. vol. iii. p. 265) by the prominence given on the title-page to the name " Emeric Vespuee." They suppose it to be a translation of another curious volume, of early date, occupied with the voy ages of Americus Vespucius, and Dr Dibdin is, consequently, amazed at the " unaccountable" price given for it by Mr He- ber. Its contents are precisely those of the " Paesi," the three first books being devoted to Cadamosto, y Rastall ? The MS. which had, meanwhile, been lost sight of, could not elude so indefatigable a collector as Stow. The single leaf referred to, of Pynson's edition, may be either part of the original work, or a hasty substitute, got up on the withdrawal of the obnoxious matter, so as to give to the work the appearance of being brought down to the latest period. (B.) (Seepage 95.) ENGLISH EXPEDITION SAID TO HAVE BEEN FOUND BY HOJEDA AT OAQUI- BAOOA. THE claims of Truth are so paramount to those of any Hypothesis, however convenient and apparently well sustained, that a caution must here be interposed. It might be presumed that Navarette (torn. iii. p. 41) would not lightly hazard the unqualified assertion alluded to; yet this consideration will, perhaps, occur with most force to those who have not examined his volumes. He adduced no authority in support of the position, and the Document which seems, at a hasty glance, to countenance it, will be found, on examination, to suggest an opposite conclusion. Cabot had discovered a vast Continent along the coast of which he proceeded to the South as far^s Florida without reaching its termi nation. Of this fact the Spanish Government was, of course, fully aware in July 1500, the date of the agreement with Hojeda in which allusion is made to the English, for we find (Navarette, torn. iii. p. 77) a Letter from the Sovereigns dated 6th May, 1500, which Navarette himself (ib. p. 42) connects with an intention to follow up the discoveries of Cabot The conduct of England was of course regarded by the Court of Spain with indignation and alarm, as in volving a violation of the Papal Bull. Cabot followed the main land no further only because his provisions were exhausted. When the Spaniards, then, subsequently discovered Terra Firma, nothing was more natural, or correct, than to suppose it connected with the Great Continent coasted by the English, and in resolving to take possess- 302 ion, their policy, and pretended exclusive rights, would lead them to watch and repel all foreign competition. It was as if, in after times, the Spanish commander at Pensacola or St Augustine had been advised of the colonization of Virginia by the English. On turning to the agreement with Hojeda it is found that he is enjoined to continue his examination of the region he had discover ed on the former voyage, and which seemed to run East and West, as it must lead towards (hacia) the place where it was known the English were making discoveries. He is directed to set up marks as he proceeds with the Royal Arms, so that it might be known he had taken possession for Spain, and the English be thereby prevent ed from making discoveries in that direction (Navarette, torn. iii. p. 86). "Item: quevaes 6 sigais aquella costa que descubristes que se corre leste Tuest, segun parece, per razon que va hacia laparte donde se ha sabido que des- cubrian los Ingleses vais poniendo las marcas con las armas de SS. A. A. 6 con otras senales que scan conocidas, cuales vos pareciere porque se conozcacomo voa habes descubierto aquella tierra, para que atages el descubrir de los Ingleses por aquella via." A Grant of Land is made to Hojeda in consideration prospectively ofhis active exertions to prosecute discoveries and to check those of the English (ib. p. 88). ** Para que labrees, fagaes labrar, vos aprovecheis podais aprovechar de alii, para lo que habees de descubrir i en la costa de la tierra fame para el atajo de loa Ingleses." The general direction of the region visited by Hojeda is correctly described, and it is certain that had Cabot not been stopped by a failure of provisions, but turned the Cape of Florida and followed the ooast, he must have reached Caquibacoa. The vast interval oc casioned by the Gulf of Mexico was then unknown. It is quite plain that the injunction contained in Hojeda's instruc tions, so far from assuming the identity of the spots visited by him and the English, involves a conjecture as to their relative position towards each other. It was by following up his discoveries that Hojeda was to meet and check intrusion. The phraseology, too, discountenances the idea that the person addressed had conveyed the information as to the danger; it seems rather communicated to him in the way of caution. Nor would the setting up of marks to let the English know, on reaching them, of the Spanish claim be probably so much insisted on, if, long before, Hojeda had personally given notice of it. The allusion seems to be not so much to any one expe- 303 dition of the English as to a particular quarter from which their en croachment was to be apprehended; and Hojeda is, therefore, en joined to spread out his party, as soon as possible, over the interme diate region, so that it might be found preoccupied. If Caquibacoa had been the scene of common discovery, and of actual encounter, it is strange that Hojeda should now be told by others of the direc tion which led towards the English. Hojeda was examined on oath, at great length, in the law pro ceedings between Don Diego Columbus and the Crown, and the* very question at issue was as to originality of discovery. He makes not the slightest allusion to such a meeting, and yet, in the course of a trial before a domestic tribunal, (here would seem to have been no motive for omitting to state what, if true, must have been known to so many. Nor is this all. If Hojeda really found a party of Eng lishmen in that quarter he can hardly escape the charge of perjury. He swears positively (Navarette, torn. iii. p. 544) that he was the first who attempted to follow up the discovery of Columbus (" el primero hombre que vino a descubrir despues que el Almirante"). After speaking of his having found the marks of Columbus he pro ceeds to detail his own discoveries, mentioning particularly Caqui bacoa; and he swears that no part of this had ever been discovered or visited either by Columbus or any one else (" nunca nadie loha- bia descubierto ni tocado en ello asi el Almirante como otra per sona"). The statement is repeated in another part of his testimony (p. 546), " e que toda esta costa y la tierra-firme, y el Golfo de Uraba y el Darien el Almirante ni otra persona no Jo habia descu bierto." One other forcible consideration will occur to those apprised of the character of Hojeda. That fiery and daring adventurer would have regarded the rival party as impudent trespassers on the dominions of the King of Spain, and as setting at defiance the Papal Bull. A man who gravely quotes this instrument in his manifesto to the poor Indians as sufficient authority for subjugating them, would hardly have exacted less deference to it from Christians. He was the last person in the world to come home quietly with a report of the intru sion not knowing when he should return and to throw on his Sovereign the necessity of giving that direct authority for expulsion which it might be more agreeable to find the officer taking for granted. Hojeda would have known his cue without a prompter. In a recent volume (Lardner's Cyclopaedia, History of Maritime and Inland discovery, vol. ii. p. 35), the assertion is made tha f 304 " Hojeda met with English navigators near the Gulf of Maracaibo," and a sufficient authority is supposed to be found for it in the lan guage of the Document already quoted. Without repeating what has been said on that point, it may be remarked that the writer in the Cyclopaedia does not deal fairly with the original. He repre sents Hojeda as ordered to follow and examine the coast which he had already discovered, and which appears to run East and West, as that is the part which the English are known to be exploring," &c. It is obvious that the most important words are here left unno ticed. The expression " por razon que va hacia la parte donde se ha sabido que descubrian las Ingleses" will not bear the translation of the Cyclopaedia without the substitution indicated by brackets, " as that is [goes towards] the part where the English are knowa to be exploring." Should it appear, in the end, that the assertion has no better foundation than the document in question, what a melancholy proof have we of the perils to which Truth is subject when a writer like Navarette, who was to clear up all difficulties, is found rashly start ing new errors to run their course through successive volumes! It must be acknowledged that the remarks now submitted rather take from the force of what appears, in the text, a plausible case. But a frequent observation of the diffusive consequences of a single error suggests that there is something of moral guilt in pressing too earnestly a statement the truth of which is not sincerely confided in. If deprived of the happy coincidence suggested by the assertion of Navarette, it must be left to conjecture to determine in what quarter the active and enterprising spirit of Cabot was employed during the long interval between his undoubted voyages from England and the time of his entering the service of Spain. Another motive has its weight The curious and important Documents at the Rolls Chapel will probably one day be arranged and made available to the purposes of history. Evidence may then come forth, and it is desirable that no erroneous hypothesis should be found in the way of Truth. Until that period we must be con tent to remain in the dark. Where the records are in such a state of confusion as to warrant the charge which has been before men tioned for finding a specific paper of which the exact date the name of the party the purpose and general tenor are given, it is obvious that no private fortune would be adequate to meet the ex pense of a general search. 305 (CO (See page 174.) WAS CABOT APPOINTED GRAND PILOT? A DOtTBT On this point is expressed in the text. Nothing is said on the subject in the grant of the pension, and the circumstantial evi dence seems to negative the existence of such an office in his time. There is preserved in the Lansdowne MSS. (No. 116, art. 3) a Me morial presented by Stephen Burrough, an English seaman of con* siderable note, the object of which is to enforce the necessity of appointing such an officer. It appears by an accompanying docu ment that Burrough himself was forthwith appointed " Cheyfie Py- lot" for life, and also " one of the foure masters that shall have the keepyng and oversight of our shipps, &c." It is declared the duty of the Chief Pilot to " have the examination and appointing of all such mariners as shall from this time forward take the charge of a Pilot or Master upon him in any ship within this our realm. '* This is the duty supposed to have been assigned to Cabot, but it seems difficult to reconcile the language of Burrough with the pre vious existence of any such office. His memorial recites " Three especial causes and considerations amongst others, wherefore the office of Pilot-Major is allowed and esteemed in Spain, Portugal, and other places where navigation flourisheth." Had any such du ties ever been exercised in England, he would of course have refer red to the fact, and insisted on the advantages which had resulted > more particularly as he was educated in the school of Cabot, and expressly names " the good olde and famine man Master Sebas tian Cabota." 2 506 (D.) (Seepage 224.) LETTERS PATENT NOW FIRST PUBLISHED DATED 19 MARCH 1501, FROM HENRY VII, TO RICHARD WARDE, THOMAS ASHEHTJRST, AND JOHN THO MAS, OF BRISTOL, AND JOHN FERNANDUS, FRANCIS FERNAWDUS, AND JOHN GUNSOLUS OF PORTUGAL. MEMORANDUM quod XIX die Marcii, anno regni Regis Henrici Septimi XVI, ista Billa delibata fuit Domino Custodi Magni Sigilli Angliae apud Westmonasterium exequenda. TO THE KYNG OUR SO VERB YNE LORD. Please it your Highness of your most noble and habundaunt Grace to graunt unto your welbeloved subjects Richard Warde, Thomas Asshehurst and Johp Thomas, merchants of your Towne of Bris- towe, and to John Fernandus, Francis Fernandus, and John Gun- solus, Squyers, borne in the Isle of Surrys under the obeisaunce of the Kynge of Portingale your gracious Lettres Patentis under your Greate Seale in due forme to be made according to the tenour here after ensuying, and that this Byll sygned with your gracious hand may be to the Reverend Fader in God Henry Byshop of Salesbury, Keeper of your Greate Seale, sufficient and immediate warrant for the making, sealying, accomplysshyng of your said Lettres Patentes, and they shall duryng ther lyves pray to God for the prosperous conty nuance of your most noble and ryall astate. H. R. Rex universis et singulis ad quos praesentes Literal Nostrae per- vcnerint Salutem: Notum sit vobis et manifestum quod ex certis considerationibus nos moventibus de advisamento Consilii Nostri, concessimus et Licentiam dedimus, prout per Praesentes Concedimus et Licentiam damus, pro Nobis et Haeredibus Nostris quantum in Nobis est, dilectis subditis nostro Ricardo Warde, Thomae Asshurst, et Johanni Thomas, mercatoribus Villae NostraeBristolliaB ac dilectis nobis Johanni Fernandus, Francisco Fernandus et Johanni Gunsolus, armigeris in Insulis de Surrys sub obediencia Regis Portugaliss ori- 307 undis, et eorum cuilibet ac cujuslibet eonim hsredibus, attomatis, factoribus, seu deputatis ac eis et eorum cuilibet plenam ac liberam auctoritatem, facultatem et potestatem cdmmittimus navigandi etse transferendi ad omnes partes, regiones et fines Maris Orientalis Oc- cidentalis, Australia, Borealis et Septentrionalis, sub Banneris, et Insigniis nostris cum tot et tantis et talibus Navibus sive Batellis quot sibi placuerint et necessarise fuerint, cujuscunque portagii qui- libet Navis sive Batella extiteri^ cum Magistris, contromagistris, marinariis pagettisaliisquehominibus pro gubernatione, salva custo- dia et defensione Navium et Batellarum prsedictarum competentibus requisitis et necessariis, ad custus et onera dicti Ricardi et alioruin praedictorum et pro hujusmodi salariis vadiis et stipendiis prout inter eos poterunt concordare ad inveniendum, recuperandum, descope- riendum et investigandum Insulas, patrias, Uegiones sive provincias quascunque Gentilium et Infidelium in quacunque Mundi parte po- sitas quae Christianis omnibus ante haec'tempora fuerunt et in prx- senti sunt incognita. Ac hujusmodi Banneras et insignia nostra in quacunque villa, op- pido, Castro insula seu terra-firma a se sie noviter inventis affigendi, ipsasque villas, oppida, castra, inswlas et terras firmas pro nobis et nomine nostro intrandi et capiendi et ea tanquam Vasalli nostri ac Gubernatores Locatenentes et Deputati nostri, eorumque dominio, titulo, dignitate et prseeminencia eorundem nobis semper reservatis, occupandi possidendi et subjugandi. Et insuper quandocumque, imposterum, hujusmodi Insulae Patriae, Terras et Provincia3 per praefatos Ricardum et alios praevocatos ad- eptae recuperatae et inventae fuerint, tune volumus et per praesentes concedimus quod omnes et singuli tarn viri quam foeminae hujus regni nostri cceterique subditi nostri et insulas hujusmodi sic noviter in- ventas visitare et in eisdem inhabitare cupientes- et desiderantes, possint et valiant licite et impune ad ipsas patrias, insulas et loca cum eorum navibus, hominibus et servientibus, rebus et bonis suis universis transire et in eisdem sub protectione et regimine dictorum Ricardi et aliorum praenominatorum morari et inhabitare, divitiasque, fructus et emolumenta patriarum, terrarum et locorum praedictorum adquierere et obtinere. Dantes insuper et concedentes praefatis Ricardo, Thomas et Johan- ni, Francisco et Johanni et eorum cuilibet plenam tenore Prsesen- tium potestatem et auctoritatem omnes et singulos homines marina- rios cseterasque personas ad Insulas, Patrias, Provincias terras firmas et loca prsedicta ex causa praedicta se divertentes et confluentes tarn 303 in comitiva dictorum Ricardi et aliorum praenominatorum quam in comitiva aliorum illuc imposterum recursum habere contingentium tarn supra Mare quam in Insulis, patriis, terris-firmis et locis hujus- modi post quam inventa et recuperata fuerint regendi et gubernandi .Legesque Ordinationes, Statuta et Proclamationes pro bono et quieto regimine et gubernatione dictorum hominum, magistrorum, marina- riorum, et aliarum personarum praedictarum faciendi, stabiliendi, ordinandi et constituendi et superinde proclamationes faciendi ac omnes et singulos quos in hac parte contraries et rebelles ac Legibus, Statutis et Ordinacionibus praedictis inobedientes invenerint ac omnes illos qui furtum, homicidia, rapinas commiserint et perpetrariunt aut aliquas mulieres Insularum seu Patriarum praedictarum, contra eorurn voluntatem aut aliter, rapuerint et violaverint juxta leges et statute per ipsos in hac parte ordinata castigandi et puniendi. Ac etiam concessimus praefatis Ricardo, Thomae, Johanni, Johanni, Francisco et Johanni haeredibus et assignatis suis quodpostquam aliquae insulae, provinciae, Terrae-firmae, regio seu provincia imposterum per ipsum Ricardum et alios preenominatos inventa fuerint tune non licebit ali*> cui seu aliquibus subdito seu subditis nostris durante termino decem annos proximo et immediate sequentes ad ipsas villas Provincias, In* sulas, Terras-firmas et Loca causa mercandisandi ac bona acquirendi absque licentia nostra regia et [the words in italics illegible but supplied conjecturally from the corresponding paragraph in the sub sequent patent of 9th Dec. 1502] dictorum Ricardi et aliorum prae nominatorum haeredum et assignatorum suorum cum suis navibus frequentare aut se divertere aut in eadem ingredi seu in eisdem pro aliquibus bonis acquirendi intromittere. Et post terminum dictorum decem annorum quod nullus ex nostris subditis ad aliquam Terram-firmam, insulam, patriam seu loca per ipsos Ricardum et Thomam et alios praedictos sic noviter inventa navigare et frequentare praesumat absque licentia nostra prsedicta et [the words in italics supplied as before] praedictorum Ricardi et cceterorum sub poena amissionis et forisfacturae omnium Bonarum, mercandisarum, rerum et navium quarumcunque ad ea loca sic no viter inventa navigare et in eadem ingredi pragsumentium (videlicet) una medietas inde erit ad opus nostrum et alia medietas ad opus dic- toram Ricardi et aliorum prsenominatorum et haeredum suorum, Et ultius ex abundanti gratia nostra concessimus et per Praesentes concedimus pro nobis et haeredibus nostris quantam in nobis est praefatis Ricardo, Thomae, Johanni, Johanni, Francisco et Johanni et eorum cuilibet haeredibus et assignatis suis quod ipsi et eorum quilibet mercandisas, mercimonia, aurum et argentum in macsa, lapi- 309 des preeiosa et alia bona quaecumque de creseeutia patriarum, insu- larumque et locorum praedictorum per ipsos sic recuperandorum ct inveniendorum tarn in dictis navibus et batellis quam aliis quibus- cunque navibus exteris a dictis patriis insulis, terris-firmis et locis in hoc regnum nostrum Angliae ad quemcunque portum seu alium locum ejusdem adducere et cariare et adduci seu cariari facere possit et valeat, eaque vendere et distribuere ad eorum proficium et advan- tagium aliquo Statute actu ordinatione seu provisione inde in con- trarium factis sive ordinatis nonobstantibus. Ac nos intime considerantes grandia custus et onera quae circa prae- missa facienda et perimplendo requiruntur volentes igitur praefatis Ricardo> Thomae et aliis memoratis personis gratiam provide facere specialem Concessimus (prout) per Prsesente's concedimus eisdem, hseredibus et assignatis suis quod ipsi et eorum quilibet h redes et assignati sui prsedicti de temporein tempus durante termino quatuor annorum a tempote recuperationis et inventionis Insularum, et pro- vinciarum prsedictarum proximo et immediate sequentes, mercandi- sas, mercimonia caeteraque bona in uno navi tantum cujuscunqUe portagii fuerit eskippata et onustata ac in hoc regnum nostrum An- gliae adducenda et transportanda in portu seu loco praedicto ad ter- ram ponere, eaque vendere, exponere et pro libito uuo distribuere possint de tempore in tempus, qualibet viaggio, durante termino, dictorum quatuor annorum absque aliquibus custumis, subsidiis, seu aliis deveriis pro eisdem bonis mercimoniis et casteris praemissis in dicta unica navi tantum contentis et eskippatis nobis aut haeredibus nostris infra dictuih regnum nostrum Anglia? aliqualiter solvendis. Proviso tamen quod nobi& de custumis, subsidiis pondagiis et aliis deveriia Nobis pro caeteris mercandisis, mercimoniis et bonis in omnibas aliis navibus contentis debitis juxta cdnsuetudinem in hoc regno nostro Angliae hactenus usitatam fideliter respondeatur ut est justum. Et Insuper volumtis et concedimus per Prsesentes quod quilibet Capitalis Magister, contra magister et Marinarius cujuslibet NaviS ad aliquam Terram-firmam Insulam, patriam, provinciam et locum praedictum frequentantis et pavigantishabeant gaudeant et per- cipiant de bonis et mercimoniis a dictis Insulis, Terris-firmis et Pro- vinciis in hoc regnum Angliae adducendis custumas et subsidia se- quentia, videlicet. Quod quilibet Magister habeat gaudeat et precipiat subsidia et custumas, quolibet viagio, quatuor doliorum. Et quilibet Contramagister vel Quarter-Magister custumas et sub sidia duorum Doliorum. Ac quilibet Marinarius custumas et subsidia unius Dolii. 310 Licet sint caveata et eskippata [the words in italics supplied as befor] lit bona sua propria aut ut bona alicujus alterius persons cu- juscunque et hoc absque aliquibus custumis, subditis debitis seu de- veriis infra hoc regnum nostrum Angliae ad opus nostrum aut hsere- dum nostrorum pro eisdenr doliitf aliqualiter solvendis seu petendis. Et si contingat aliquem vel aliquos mercatorem seu mercatores hujus regni nostri ad dictas Insulas Patrias et Loca sub licencia dic- torum subdictorum nostrorum aut absque licencia causa habendi mer- candisas et mercimonia adventare et laborare ad bona et mercimonia ab eisdem partibus in hoc regnum nostrum adducere tune volumus et concedimus, per praesentes, praefatis, Ricardo, Thomae, Johanni, Johanni, Francisco, Johanni hseredibus et assignatis suis quod ipsi durante termino decem annorum antedicto habeant de quolibet hu- jusrnodi rnercatore, solutis nobis custumis, subsidiis et aliis deveriis nobis in hac parte debitis et consuetis, vicesimum partem omnium hujusmodi bonarum et mercimoniarum per ipsos a dictis Insulis, patriis et Locis quolibet viagio durante dicto termino decem annorum in hoc regnum nostrum Angliae traducendorum et cariandorum ha- bendam et capiendam hujusmodi vicesimam partem in portu ubi con- tigerit dicta bona discarcari et exonerarL Proviso Semper quod praedicti Ricardus et alii praedicti, haeredes et assignati sui et non alii omnino imposterum durante dicto termino decem annorum sint Factores et Attornati in dictis Insulis Terris- nrmis et Patriis pro quibuscunque hujusmodi mercatoribus aliisque personis illuc ex causa praedicta confluentibus in etpro eorum Factis mercatoriis in eisdem. Proviso etiam quod nulla navis cum bonis et mercandisis a dictis partibus sic noviter inventis carcata et onusta postquam in aliquam portum hujus [the words in italics supplied as before] Regni nostri adducta fuerint non exoneratur de eisdem bonis et mercandisis nisi in praesentia praefatorum Ricardi et aliorum praedictorum eorumvB hseredum seu deputatorum ad hoc assignandum sub poena forisfac- turae eorumdem bonarum et mercandisiarum ; unde una medietas ad opus nostrum et alia medietas praefatis Ricardo et aliis praenominatis et haeredibus suis applicentur. Et *i imposterum aliqui extranet aut alias [the part in italics sup plied as before] personae ad ipsas partes contra voluntatern ipsorum Ricardi et aliorum praenominatorum causa habendi divitias navigare et ea vi et armis ingredi ac dictos Ricardum et alios praedictos aut hseredes suos ibidem insultare ac eos expellere et debellare aut alias inquietare presumpserint quod tune volumus ac eisdem subditis tenore Praesentium damus et committimus ipsos extraneos licet sint 311 subditi et vasalli alicujus Principis Nobiscum in liga et amicitia totis suis veribus tarn per terrain quam per mare et aquas dulces expugnan- di resistendi et Gueriam contra eos levandi et faciendi casque cap- iendi, subpeditandi et incarcerandi ibidem quousque Fines et Re- demptiones eisdem subditis nostris fecerint moratur aut alias secun- dum sanam discretionem ipsorum subditorum nostrorum et haeredum suorum castigandi et puniendi. At etiam praefatis subditis nostris caeterisque personis praedictis plenam tenore Praesentium potestatem damus et committimus sub se quoscunque Capitaneos, Locatenentes et Deputatos in singulis Civi- tatibus, villis, Oppidis et Locis dictarum Insularum Provinciarum, Patriarum et Locorum praedietorum ad regendum et gubernandum omnes et singulas personas in eisdem partibus sub regimine et gu- bernatione dictorum subdictorum nostrorum ibidem commorantium ac ad justitiam eisdem secundum tenorem et effectum Ordinationum Statutorum et Proclamationum praedictorum debite exequendum et administrandum per Literas suas Patentes sigillis eonim sigillandas, faciendi, constituendi nominandi et substituendi. Et insuper con- cessimus et per Praesentes concedimus praefatis Ricardo, Thomse, Johanni, Johanni, Francisco et Johanni ad terminum vitae suae et cujuslibet eorum diutius viventis officium Admiralli supra Mare in quibuscunque locis, patriis, et provinces a se sic noviter inventis et imposterum inveniendis et recuperandis, ipsosque Ricardum, Tho- mam, Johannem, Johannem, Franciscum, Johannem et eorum quem- libet conjunctim et divisim Admirallos nostros in eisdem partibus facimus, constituimus, ordinamus et deputamus, per Praesentes dantes et concedentes eisdem et eorum cuilibet plenam tenore Praesentiarum potestatem et auctoritatem ea omnia et singula quae ad officium Ad- mirallitatis pertinent faciendi ^xercendi et exequendi secundum legem et consuetudinem maritimam in hoc regno nostro Angliae usitatam. Ac etiam postquam praefati Ricardus Warde, Thomas Ashhurst et Johannes Thomas, ac Johannes Fernandus, Franciscus Fernandus et Johannes Gunsolus aliquas terras-firmas, insulas, patrias et provin- cias, oppida, castra, civitates et villas per assistentiam nostram sic jnvenerint, obtinuerint, et subjugaverint tune volumus et per Pree- sentes concedimus eisdem, haeredibus et assignatis suis quod ipsi et haeredes sui habeant, teneant et possideant sibi haeredibus et assignatis suis omnia et singula talia et tanta, terras-firmas, insulas, patrias, provincias, castra, oppida, fortallicia, civitates et villas qualia et quanta ipsi et homines tenentes et servientes sui posstmt inhabitare, 312 custodire sustinere et manutere: Habenda et Tenendaeadem Terras Insulas et loca prsedicta sibi> hseredibus et assignatis suis et cujusli- bet eorem de nobis ethaeredibus nostris imperpetuum per Fidelitatem tantum absque aliquo Compoto" seu aliquo alio nobis aut haeredibus nostris proinde reddendo seu faciendo, Dignitate Dominio, Regali- tate, Jurisdictione, et pre-eminentia in eisdem nobis semper salvis et omnino reservatis. Et ultius concessimus praefatis Ricardo, Thomae, Johanni, Johan- ni, Francisco, Johanni quod ipsi haeredes et assignati sui praedicti dictas terras-firmas, insulas et provincias ipsis et haeredibus suis prae- dictis ut praemittitur sic concessas, postquam iaventae et recuperates sint, ac cum in plena possessiorie earundem fuerint teneant possideant et gaudeant libere, quiete, et pacifice absque impedimento aliquali nostri aut'haeredum nostrorum quarumcunque, Et quod nullus es: subditis nostris eos eorum aliqUem de et super possessione et titulo suis de et in dictis terris-firmis, insulis et provinciis se aliqualiter contra voluntatem suam expellat quovis modo seualiquis extranet^ aut aliqui extranei virtute aut colore alicujus concessions nos- trsB sibi Magno Sigillo Nostro per antea factse aut imposterum faciendse cum aliquibus aliis locis et insulis .. . et contiguis ac membris et Parcellis praefatis Insulis Terris-firmis Provinciis et locis .... absque licen- tia subditorum nostrorum et alio- rum prsenominatorum aliquo modo intromittat nee intromittant [Through tbe words in italics the pen is drawn in the original, and a space then occurs, from which the writing has been carefully and completely erased], Promittentes bona-fide et in verbo regio Nos ratum gratum et firm- urn habituros totum et quicquid praefati Ricardus, Thomas, Johannes, Johannes Franciscus et Johannes et eorum quilibet pro praemissorum complemento fecerint fierique procuraverint in hac parte. Et quod Nos aut haeredes nostri nullo unquam tempore in future ipsos aut eorum aliquam hasredes et. assignatos suos in jure, titulo et possess ione suis inquietabimus, impediemus aut molestium eis faciemus nee per alios nostros subditos aut alios quoscunque quantum in nobis fuerit fieri seu procurari, permittemus seu procurabimus, nee ipsos haeredes et assignatos suos pro* aliqua causa imposterum emergente seu contingente ab eisdem Terris-firmis, provinciis et locis nullo modo amovebimus.aut amoveri seu expelli per subditos nostros pro curabimus. Et ultius ex uheriori gratia nostra et mero motu nostro concessimus et per Praesentes concedimus pro Nobis et haeredibns 313 quantum in nobis est Johanni Johanni Fernandus, Francisco Fernan- dus et Johanni Gunsalos, Armigeris de Insulis de Surrys subditos Regis Portugaliaeoriundiset eorum cuilibetquod ipsi et eorum quili- bet ac omnes liberi sui tarn procreati quam procreandi in perpetuam flint indigeni et ligei nostri et hsereduiu nostrorum et in omnibus causis, querelis, rebus et materiis quibuscumque habeantur pertrac- tarentur teneantur, reputentur et gubernentur tanquam veri et fideles Ligei Nostri infra Regnum nostrum Angliae oriundi etnon aliternec alio mbdo. Et quod ipsi et omnes liberi sui praedicti "omnimodo actiones reales personales et mixtas in omnibus Curiis, locis et juris- dictionibus nostris quibuscunque habere exercere eisque uti et gau- dere ac eas in eisdem placitare et implacitari respondere et respon- deri, defendere ac defendi possint et eorum quilibet possit in omni bus sicuti veri et fideles Ligei nostri infra Regnum nostrum prsedic- tum oriundi. Et quod ipsi et eorum quilibet Terras, Tenementa, reditus, reversiones, servitia et alios possessiones quaecunque tarn in ddminio quam in reversione infra dictum regnum nostrum Angliae ac alia dominia et loca sub obedientia nostra perquirere, capere, reci- pere, habere tenere possidere et haereditare sibi, haeredibus et assig- Ratis sui imperpetuum .vel alio modo quocunque ac ea dare, vendere, alienare et legare cuieunque personae sive quibus-cunque personiis sibi placuerit libere, qiiiete, licite et impune possint et quilibet eorum possit ad libitum suum adeo libere integre et pacifice sicut possit et valeat aliquis Ligeorum nostroruzn infra regnum nostrum Angliae oriundus. Ita tamen quod prasdicti Johannes Fernandus, Francis- eus et Johannes Gunsolus et omnes liberi sui praedicti solvant aut solvi faciant et eorum quilibet solvat seu solvi faciat talia custumas subsidia et alia demandia pro bonis, mercibus, mercandisis et merci- moniis suis in Regnum nostrum Angliae adducendis vel extra idem Regnum educendis qualia alienigeni nobis solvant aut solvere debe- rent vel consueverunt Et quod idem Johannes Fernandus, Fran- ciscus et Johannes Gunsolus et omnes liberi sui praedicti de castero in futuro colore seu vigore alicujus Statuti, Ordinacionis sive con- ceseionis in Parliamento nostro aut extra Parliamenium nostrum facti vel fiendi non arcteantur seu compellantur nee eorum aliquis arctenea- tur teneatur seu compellatur ad solvendum, dandum vel supportan- dum nobis vel alicui haeredum nostrorum seu cuicunque alteri aliqua Taxas, Tallagia seu alia onera quaecunque pro terris, tenementis, bonis vel personis suis praeterquam talia et tanta qualia et quanta alii fideles Ligei nostri infra dictum Regnum nostrum oriundi pro bonis, terris tenementis seu personis suis solvunt dant faciunt vel supportant aut 2P 314 solvere, dare, facere vel supportare consueverunt et teneantur sed quod praedicti Johannes Fernandus, Franciscus et Johannes Gunso- lus et omnes liberi sui praedicti habere et possidere valeant et possint et eorum quilibet valeat et possit omnia et omnimodo alia Libertates, privilegia, franchesias et custumas ac eis uti et gaudere possint et eorum quilibet possit infra dictum Regnum nostrum Angliae, jurisdic- tiones et dominia nostra quaecunque adeo plene libere, quiete, integre et pacifice sicut coeteri Ligei nostri infra idem Regnum nostrum ori- undi habent utunt et gaudent aut habere, possidere, uti et gaudere de- beantet valeant aliquo statuto, acto, ordinacione vel aliqua alia causa, re, vel materia quacunque nonobstante, Proviso semper quod praefati Johannes Fernandus, Franciscus et Johannes Gunsolus homagium ligeum nobis faciunt et eorum quili bet faciat ac Lotto et Scotto et - aliis oneribus in Regno nostro pras- dicto debitis et consuetis contribuant et eorum quilibet contribuat sicut alii ligei nostri infra dictum, regnum nostrum oriundi faciunt Proviso etiam quod iidem Johannes Fernandus, Franciscus et Johannes Gunsolus solvant et eorum quilibet solvat nobis et hseredi- bus nostris tot et tanta custumas subsidia et alia deveria pro bonis et mercandisis suis prout alienigeni nobis solvere et reddere teneantur. Et ulterius ex uberiori gratia nostra concessimus praefatis Ricardo, Thomas, Johanni, Johanni, Francisco, et Johanni quod ipsi habeant Praesentes Literas Nostras in Cancellaria nostra absque aliquo fine seu feodo aut aliquibus finibus seu feodis pro eisdem Literis nostri? aut aliqua parte eorundem aut pro Magno Sigillo nostro ad opiu nostrum in Hannaperio dictae Cancellarias nostrae aliqualiter sol- vendis. Et volumus et concedimus per Praesentes quod Reverendissimus in Christo Pater Henricus Episcopus Salisb. Gustos Magni Sigilli nostri auctoritate praesentis Concessionis nostrae fieri faciat etsigillari tot et talia Brevia sub Magno Sigillo nostro sigillanda Custodi sive clerico Hanaperii nostri dirigenda pro exoneratione dictorum Fini- um et Feodorum quot et qualia in hac parte necessaria fuerint et re- quisita, absque aliquo alio Warranto aut prosecutione penes Nos in hac parte faciendis. In cujus, &c. 315 (See page 276.) CONJECTURE AS TO THE NAME " DOMINIS VOBISCUM*' ERRONEOUSLY ASSOCIATED WITH THE VOYAGE OF 1527 FORSTER*S MISTAKE AS TO NORUMBEGA NAVARETTE, &C., AS TO THE PERIOD AT WHICH NEW FOUNDLAND WAS FIRST FREQUENTED FOR FISHING. WHENCE could have arisen the misconception of Frobisher as to the words Dominus Vobiscum associated with this enterprise ? As sured that he was wrong, a conjecture may be hazarded. Were they the final adieu and benediction of Wolsey to his ecclesiastical proteg6 and correspondent perhaps as the vessel passed Greenwich^ Such an exclamation would linger on the popular ear. One of the ships was never heard of, but all hopes of her could not have been abandoned for many years, and the fate of those on board must have long been a subject of painful speculation, and to their relatives of agonizing suspense. The invocation of the odious Cardinal may have been recalled as little likely to propitiate Heaven in fact of evil omen and the -impression, coloured highly at the time by the imagination, might be confusedly traced by Frobisher, half a century afterwards, amidst the faded reminiscences of the Expedition. Forster (p. 436, note) is very much puzzled at the name of No- rumbega, which occurs in the heading of Hakluyt's account of the yoyage, and supposes/* that some of the toys which were presented to the savages, consisting of looking-glasses, bells, &c., were of Nuremberg manufacture, and that by the name given to the country they meant to preserve the memory of this fact!" The name is found distinguishing the 'country immediately to the southward of Newfoundland on the maps or descriptions of Ortelius, De Laet, Bertius, and Cluverius. In another passage of Hakluyt, (vol. iii. p; 163) reference is made to the same Norumbegain connexion with the enterprise of Sir Humphrey Gilbert, and in a way not te be mis; understood. As to the origin of the name, it might have occurred to Forster, from, the termination Hochlega, &c. and the usual cus tom of the French of preserving Indian names, that it was aboriginal. 316 He has not only overlooked these considerations, but something else of which his ignorance is less excusable. The article which imme diately follows the account of Verrazani's voyage of 1524, inRamu- sio, (torn. iii. fol. 423, F.) is ".a Discourse by a great Sea Captain of France," relative to these regions, written fifteen years after the time of Verrazani. He describes the " terra di Norumbega" as lying where we have stated, and expressly states it to be so called by the natives, " la terra e detta da paesani suai Norembega." So, too, Thevet, in his Cosmographie Universelle, (Paris ed. of 1575, torn. ii. fol. 1010) says of this region, " que aucuns ont appelee Terre Francayse et'ceux du pays Norumbeque." There is one incidental point which the Letter of Rut conclusively settles. Navarette has a long dissertation to prove that the New foundland fishery was not pursued at so early a period as has been usually supposed. This opinion is adopted by a recent writer, (Dr Lardner's Cyclopaedia, History of Maritime and Inland discovery, vol. ii. p. 24) who says " Don M. de Navarette, whose authority on this point seems conclusive, is disposed to think that the Bis- cayans did not discover Newfoundland till 1526, and he shews that they did not frequent the Banks till 1540." -Now we have the positive statement of the English Commander to Henry VIII. that on entering St John's on the 3rd of August, 1527, he found "eleven sail of Normans, and one Brittaine, and two Portugall Barkes, and alia fishing." Herrera (Dec. ii. lib. v. cap. iii.) gives this same report by an English vessel which had touched, in the West-Indies, as to her having been at the Baccalaos, and found there engaged in fishing fifty vessels, Spanish, French, and Portuguese. The misfor tune of Don M. Navarette is that with no firm hold of the History of the New World, even as found in the works of his own country men, he attaches an importance altogether exaggerated, and sometimes absurd, to the Documents over which he is incumbent, and when he finds a scrap of manuscript exhibits it with a sort of triumph and as quite decisive, when, in a majority of cases, it owes its origin to ignorance or fraud* Thus, on this point, he gravely cites the nega tive testimony of half-a-dozen masters of vessels taken on a trial of which he has a MS. account. These persons, it seems, were unable to carry back further the history of the fishery. Infinite discretion is necessary on the part of a writer circumstanced like Don M. Na varette. The eye quickly becomes diseased unless the microscope be often withdrawn, and a healthy look taken round the natural horizon 317 PORTRAIT OP SEBASTIAN OABOT BY HOLBEIN. REFERENCE has already been made (page 179) to the Portrait of Sebastian Cabot in considering the singular misconception as to the meaning of the epithet " Militis aurati." The statement of Pur- chas (vol. iv. p. 1812) is as follows: "Sir Seb. Cabota; his Picture in the Privie Gallerie at White- Hall hath these words, Effigies Seb. Caboti Angll, filii Joannis Caboti Veneti militis aurati, fyc. ; he was born at Venice, and serving Henry VII., Henry VIII., Edward VI. was .accounted English Galpano saith he was borne at Bristol." This Picture now belongs to the Representatives of the late Charles Joseph Harford, Esq. of Bristol. The inscription which Purchas curtails by an "&c." is this: " Effigies Seb. Caboti Angli, filii Johannis Caboti Veneti Militis Aurati, Primi Inventoris Terras Novae sub Henrico VIL *ftngli& JRege." The manner in which the Portrait came to the knowledge of Mr Harford, and finally into his possession, is very minutely stated in & Memoir prepared by him and left with his family. Without need lessly introducing names it may suffice to state that whilst travelling in Scotland, in 1792, he saw it for the first time at the seat of a no bleman; and, many years afterwards, his friend the late Sir Frede rick Eden was enabled to gratify his anxious wishes by procuring it for him. The work of Purchas was published in 1625, at the close of the reign of James I. That the picture was not in the Gallery in the time of Charles II., would appear from the following circumstances: There is a tract by Evelyn, the celebrated author of Sylvct, &c., entitled " Navigation and Commerce, their Original and Progress, containing a succinct account of traffic in general, its benefits and improvements; of discoveries, wars, and conflicts at sea, from the original of Navigation to this day; with special regard to the English nation; their several voyages and Expeditions to the beginning of our late differences with Holland; in which his Majesty's Title to the 318 Dominion of the Sea is asserted against the novel and later preten ders, by J. Evelyn, Esq. S.R.S. London, 1674." It is dedicated to Charles II., to whom the author expresses his gratitude for an ap pointment to the Council of Commerce and Plantations. The object of it, as may be inferred from the title, is to shew the early and dif fusive influence of England at sea. Referring to the triumphant conflicts with France in the time of Henry VIII. he says, (p. 73) " see also that rare piece of Holbein's in his Majesty's Gallery at White-Hall." He adverts (p. 57) to Sebastian Cabot, " born with us at Bristol," and hazards a conjecture as to his having, with his father, " discovered Florida and the shoars of Virginia with that whole tract as far as Newfoundland before the bold Genoese." Had the portrait in question been in the Gallery at White-Hall in Eve lyn's time, he would not have omitted to notice the remarkable as sertion which its inscription conveys. The disappearance of the picture, therefore, from White-Hall, and its getting into private hands, may be referred to the intermediate period. It was, probably, bought at the Sales which took place after the death of Charles I., and of which the following, account is found in Walpole's Anecdotes of Painting in England: " Immediately after the death of the King 1 , several votes were passed for sale of his goods, pictures, statues, &c. Feb. 20, 1648. It was referred to the Committee of the Navy to raise money by sale of the crown jewels, hanging's, and other goods of the late King. * In the ensuing month the House proceeded to vote, that the personal estate of the late King, Queen, and Prince should be inventoried, appraised, and sold. This vote, in which they seem to have acted honestly, not allowing their own members to be concerned in the sale, was the cause that the collections fell into a variety of low hands, and were dispersed among the painters and officers of the late King's household; where many of them remained on sale with low prices affixed. " All other furniture from all the King's Palaces was brought up and exposed to sale; there are specified, particularly, Denmark or Somerset-house, Greenwich, Whitehall, Nonsuch, Oatlands, Windsor, Wimbleton-house, St James's, Hampton- court, Richmond, Theobalds, Ludlow, Carisbrook, and Kenilworth Castles; Bewd- ley-house, Holdenby-house, Royston, Newmarket, and Woodstock manor-house. One may easily imagine that suoh a collection of pictures, with the remains of jew els and plate, and the furniture of nineteen palaces, ought to have amounted to a far greater sum than one hundred and eighteen thousand pounds. " The sale continued to August 9, 1653. The prices were fixed, but if more was offered, the highest bidder purchased; this happened in some instances, not in many. Part of the goods were sold by inch of candle. The buyers called con tractors, signing a writing for the several sums. If they disliked the bargain, they were at liberty to be discharged from the agreement on paying one fourth of the sura stipulated. Among the purchasers of statues and pictures were several pain- 319 ters, as Dccritz, Wright, Baptist Van Leemput, Sir Balthazar Gerbier, &c. The Cartoons of Raphael were bought by his Highness (Cromwell) for 300/." The circumstances which refer this Portrait to Holbein seem to be conclusive. Cabot is represented as in extreme age. Now he had not been in England from 1517 until his return in 1548. The Portrait, therefore, must have been taken after the last-mentioned date. Holbein enjoyed the continued patronage of Henry VIII. after Sir Thomas More had introduced his works to the King's no tice in the manner so familiarly known. He lived through the reign of Edward VI., and died at Whitehall of the plague, in 1554. It is not probable, under such circumstances, that a Portrait of Cabot, destined for the King's Gallery, would have been taken by any other hand. Such seems to be the curious history of a Picture in itself so inter esting. Painted for Edward VI., in compliment to this great sea man and national benefactor, and the property, in succession, of two Queens, and two Kings of England, its retirement to private life may probably be dated from a Sale at which Oliver Cromwell was a bidder. Cabot was evidently, as has been said, at a very advanced age when the Portrait was taken. His stature, though somewhat lost in a slight stoop, must have been commanding. Holbein would seem to have wished to catch the habitual, unpremeditated expression which he had doubtless, from engagements about the Court, had fre quent opportunities of remarking. It is that of profound, and even painful, thought; and in the deeply-marked lines, and dark hazel eye, there yet linger tokens of the force and ardour of character of this extraordinary man. The right hand exhibits an admirable spe cimen of the painter's minute, elaborate finish. Of the compasses which it holds one foot is placed on a great globe resting on a table on which are an hour-glass and writing materials. The rich robe, and massy gold chain, are probably badges of his office as Governor of the Society of Merchant-Adventurers. It is impossible not to gaze with deep interest, on this memorial, heightened, perhaps, by a reflection on its present humble posi'tion emblematic, indeed, of the slight on the closing years of the great original,* * A Catalogue of the Pictures, &c., belonging to Charles I., drawn up in his lifetime, and apparently for his use, is found amongst the Harleian MSS. No. 4718. Amongst those enumerated as then in the Privy Gallery at White-Hall that of Cabot is not mentioned. This might lead to the inference that it had got into private hands sooner than is above suggested, particularly as it appears by 320 (G.) ERROR IN ATTRIBUTING TO CABOT THB WORK ENTITLED *' NAVIGATIONS NELLE PARTE SETTENTRIONALE," PUBLISHED AT VENICE IN 1583. THERE has been universally referred to Sebastian Cabot a work en titled " Navigatione nelle parte settentrionale," published at Venice in 1583; and in the Catalogue of the Bodleian Library, it is actu ally announced under the title " Cabot." The Biographic Univer- selle, adverting to this circumstance, says, in seeming despair, that this work, unknown to all the Biographers who had been consulted on the subject, is perhaps imaginary.* An explanation may be* given, though somewhat at the expense of the Biographic Univer- selle, and of the Bodleian Catalogue. The work in question will be found in the second volume of Ra- musio (ed. of 1583 and of 1606, fol. 212). In the Memoir of Ca mus on the Collection of De Bry and Thevenot, he takes occasion to furnish a list of the contents of Ramusio, and in his account (p. 10) of the second volume this tract is noticed as the 17th article. The Biographic Universelle cites this Memoir (art. Ramusio), but of the Catalogue that some of the Pictures had been recently obtained in the way of exchange. Again, it may have been sent, or taken, away by the King. In the MS. work of Richard Symonds (Harleian MSS. No. 991), it is said, "The Com mittee at Somerset-house valued the King's pictures .and other movable goods at 200,000/., notwithstanding that both himself and the Queen had carried away abun dance." The painting in question is not specially mentioned in a List of the Sales during the Protectorate, found in the Harleian MSS. No. 7352, though this is by no means decisive, as several of the entries are mere charges against individuals for "a Picture," " two pictures," " three pictures," &c. (fol. 222, et seq.). Ca bot's Portrait has recently been seen, in London, by the most eminent artists, and instantly recognised as a Holbein. However we may balance between probabili ties as to its intermediate history, a doubt as to its identity with the picture referred to by Purchas, seems to involve not only the necessity of accounting for the dis appearance of the latter, but also the extravagant supposition that /wo Portraits of Cabot, bearing the same remarkable inscription, were executed by the great- Artist of his day. * ' Ce livre inconnu a tous les Bibliographes que nous avons consulted cst peutetre imaginaire" (art. Cabot). 321 course it could not have been read 'attentively, or we should not have heard of the ineffectual inquiries amongst the bibliographers. The authenticity of the work, wholly unknown to the bibliographers consulted by the Biographie Universelle, is discussed by Foscarini in his Literatura Veneziana, and by Tiraboschi in the Storia Delia Literatura Italiana. They denounce the error of attributing it to Cabot, though not aware of its real history. Tiraboschi supposes it a translation of some work now lost. The truth happens to be, that it is nothing more than the Journal of Stephen Burrough during his two Voyages to the North-East, with an absurd introduction from some anonymous writer at Venice! The account of the incident at Gravesend which probably sug gested to the Italian the name of Cabot is omitted, and the whole is disfigured, but the identity may at once be detected by comparing the closing paragraph of the article in Ramusio as to the first voy age (fol. 216) with the corresponding paragraph of the Journal of Stephen Burrough (Hakluyt, vol. i. p. 283); and, again, the con cluding paragraph of the second voyage (foh 219) with the corres ponding part in Hakluyt, vol. i. p. 295. Bancroft Librwjjl It is proper to remark that in the work of Ramusio, as published by himself, this tract is not to be found, but has been interpolated in the subsequent editions. The voyage, indeed, was not com pleted until after Ramusio's death. Yet this circumstance rather aggravates the charge against the Biographie Universelle. That work (art. Ramusio) earnestly advises the reader to consult Camtts* in selecting a copy of Ramusio, and Camus, following the Books on * An instance of the carelessness of this writer ought to be mentioned in justice to the Abbe Prevost. In the " Histoire et Description Generale de Ja Nouvelle France," by Charlevoix (Ed. of 1744, torn. i. p. 100), an account is given of the memorable expedition of Dominique de Gourgue to Florida, and use is made of a history of the expedition in the possession of the family of de Gourgue, drawn up by the chivalrous Commander himself. This statement is repeated by the Abbe Prevost (Histoire Generale des Voyages, vol. xiv. p. 448, Paris ed. in 4to), with a reference, such as he had before given, to Charlevoix as the Historian of New France. Camus (p. 46) falls into the error of supposing that the reference of Prevost is to the old work of Lescarbot, and remarks, "II cite pourgarant dece faitPauteur de 1'Histoire de la N&uvelle France; je n^ai pu 1'y trouver ail moins dans Fedition de 1609-!" The document referred to by Charlevoix is yet in the possession of the Family, and the Viscount Gourgue was good enough recently, at the author's request, to permit the collation of it with a copy of the MS. Narra tive in the King's Library at Paris, supposed to have been transmitted by Domi nique de Gourgue to Charles IX. 2 Q 322 Bibliography, specially recommends the perfidious editions. It is plain, therefore, that the remarks of the Biographic Universelle were made without consulting the guide which is recommended to the reader. A remark cannot be forborne on the utter folly which has con sented to repeat the advice referred to as to the selection of a Ra- musio. It is obvious that the great value of such a work resides in the assurance felt by the reader that the articles found there were subjected, at an early period, to the honest judgment of the compi ler, and that before admitting them he satisfied himself that they had a fair claim to authenticity. The discrimination which Ramusio exercised has become an important item of evidence. Thus he re jects the first and second of the alleged voyages of Amerigo Ves pucci, but republishes the two last* Though he speaks in respect ful terms of Vespucci, we may fairly infer that he considered the first Voyage as a fiction, and the account of the second as suspicious on account of the unwarrantable importance assumed by Vespucci for himself at a time when he was known to have been acting under the orders of Hojeda. Now what can be more obviously absurd than to recommend an edition where this valuable characteristic is completely lost sight of and new matter is interpolated, on no avowed responsibility, yet in such a manner as to have misled some of the most learned individuals and societies of the day, and of course fatally deceptive to those who make only an occasional hurried re ference to the work? One example of the pernicious consequence of this proceeding is too remarkable to be passed over. It relates to that memorable fraud, the pretended voyage of Nicholas and Antonio Zeno. The Dedication of this work, as originally published by Marco- lini, bears date December, 1558. Ramusio died in July 1557; and of course it is impossible that it could have been published by him, or that he could have marked it for insertion. It does not appear in the Ramusio of 1559, but was interpolated into the second vo lume in 1574, seventeen years after his death. This circumstance is decisive against its authenticity. Ramusio, a native -of Venice, was not only a diligent and anxious collector of voyages, but, it ap pears by his work, was familiar with the family of the Zeno of that " In questo volume non si fa mentione delJe navigation! fatte da Amerigo Ves pucci all* Indie Occidental! per ordine de gli Re de Castiglia, ma solanaente di quelle due che el fece di Commissionie del Re di Fortogallo" (torn. i. fol. 130). 323 city, and he speaks with pride (Ed. of 1559, torn. ii. foL 65, D.) of the adventurous travels of Caterino Zeno in Persia. Had the materials for such a narrative existed he wouid have eagerly seized the opportunity of embodying them, and it is plain that the impos ture dared not make its appearance in his lifetime. Yet, from the subsequent interpolation, this tract, by almost unanimous consent, has been considered to bear the high sanction of Ramusio's name. " This," says Forster (p. 180), " is the account given of the affair by Ramusio" The Biographic Universelle (art. Zeno) says " Cette Relation a etc reimprime par Ramusio." And the Quarterly Re view (vol. xvi. p. 165, note) speaks of certain things known " before Ramusio published the Letters of the two Zeni." ID short, the misconception has been uirversal, Nor is it merely from the silence of Ramusio that an inference is drawn against this pretended voyage. He declares in the Preface to the Third Volume, that he considers it not only proper, but in the nature of a duty, to vindicate the truth in the behalf of Columbus, who was the first to discover and bring to light the New World.* He answers in detail the calumny that the project was suggested to Columbus by a Pilot who died in his house, and refers for a re futation of the idle tale- to persons yet living in Italy, who were present at the Spanish Court when Columbus departed. He recites the circumstances which had conducted the mind of Columbus, as an able and experienced mariner and Cosmographer, to the conclusion that his project was practicable. " Such," he declares in conclusion, " were the circumstances that led to his anxiety to undertake the voyage, having fixed it in his mind that by going directly West the Eastern extremity of the In dies would be discovered, "f He breaks into an apostrophe to the rival city of Genoa which had given birth to Columbus, a fact so much more glorious than that about which seven of the greatest cities of Greece contended. J ft No pure e convene vole, ma par mi anco di essere obligate a dire alquate parole accompagnate dalla verita per diffesa del Signer Christoforo Colombo, Uqual fu ilprimo inventore di discoprire etfar venire in luce qucsta meta del mondo." t " Tutte queste cose lo inducevano a voler far questo viaggio, havendo fisso nelP animo che andando a dritto per Ponente esso troverebbe le parti di Levant! ove sono Tlndie." t " Genoua si vanti et glorii di cosi excellente huomo cittadin suo et mettasi paragone di quatunque altra citta percioche costui non fu Poeta, come Homero 324 The full force of this evidence cannot be understood without ad verting to the strength of Ramusio's prejudices in favour of his native City. He honestly acknowledges that their influence may mislead him when he is disposed to rank the enterprize of Marco Polo, of Venice, by land, as more memorable than even that of the great Genoese by sea.* Yet this is the writer who is said to have given to the world un deniable evidence not only that the Venetian Zeno knew of these regions upwards of a century before the time of Columbus, but that traces had been discovered proving that the Venetians had visited them long before the time of Zeno. And in a work of the present day we have these monstrous assertions: They [theZeni] "added a Relation which, whether true or false, contained the positive assertion of a continent existing to the West of the Atlantic Ocean. This Relation was unquestionably known to Columbus.'^ The professed author of the book, Marcolini, was a bookseller and publisher of Venice. It bears his well-known device, of which Dr Dibdinj: has given a fac-simile. The motive for getting it up is pretty well disclosed in the concluding remarks which allude to the prevailing appetite of the public for such works. It is stated that del qual sette citta dell maggiori che havesse la Grecia contesero insieme affer- mando ciascuna che egli era su Cittadino, ma fa un huomo il quale hafatto nascer al mondo un altro mondo che effetto incomparabilment molto maggiore del detto di sopra." The terms in which he denounces the effort to disparage Columbus, on the ground of pretended hints from the Pilot, assure us of the manner in which he would have treated the subsequent imposture absurdly attributed to himself; " questa favola laqual malitiosamente dopo suo ritorno fu per invidia finta dalla gente bassa et ignorante." Again: "una favola pieno di malignita et di tristitia." He loftily denounces the baseness with which a low envy had seized on and dressed up this tale, " ad approvar la detta favola et dipingerla con mille colori." " Et se 1'affettione della patria non m'inganna, mi par che per ragion probabile si possa aflfermare che questo fatto per terra debba esser anteposto a quello di mare," Pref. torn. ii. | Dr Lardner's Cabinet Cyclopaedia, History of Maritime and Inland Discovery, voL i. p. 225. $ Bibliographical Decameron, vol. ii. p. 244-5. In Singer's learned "Researches iuto the History of Playing Cards, with Illustrations of the origin of Printing and Engraving on Wood," is an account (p. 64-65) of Marcolini's beautiful volume, entitled Le Sortl. "The decorative woodcuts are very numerous, and many of them very beautiful ; great numbers of them afterwards served to decorate the Capriccios of that odd genius Doni, who seems to have been employed by Marcolini to write some of his whimsical productions as vehicles for these Woodcuts.'* 325 the slight materials extant had been put together that they might not be altogether lost at a period "most studious of new narratives, and of the discoveries of strange countries, made by the bold and indefati gable exertions of our ancestors" (" studiosissima delle Narrationi nuovi et delle discoperte de paesi non conosciuti fatte dal grande an- imo et grande industria de i nostri moggiori"). A full exhibition of the evidence which establishes this produc tion to be a rank imposture would require more space than can here be justifiably devoted to a topic purely incidental. As it is likely to engage attention, anew, in connexion with the rumoured disco veries in East or Lost Greenland, such a degree of interest may be thrown round it as to warrant, hereafter, in a different form, a de tailed examination. Reverting to the immediate subject under consideration the al terations of Ramusio in recent editions an example occurs in refer ence to this voyage of the Zeni, which shews not only that new matter has been unwarrantably introduced, but that the text has been corrupted, without hesitation, to suit the purposes of the moment. It has been made a charge against Hakluyt, that in translating the work of Marcolini, he has interpolated a passage representing JEsto- tiland, the Northern part of the new Region, as abounding in gold and other metals: "In Hakluyt's Collection of Voyages, it is added, they have mines of all manner of metals, but especially they abound in gold. This passage, however, is not to be found in the Italian original of Ramusio. "* The English Translator of Forster, referring (p. 189) to the al leged infidelity of Hakluyt, says, " From many circumstances, it appears, that Hakluyt's collection was made principally with a view to excite his countrymen to prosecute new discoveries in America, and to promote the trade to that quarter of the globe. Considering it in this light, and that hardly any thing was thought worthy of notice in that age but mines of silver and mountains of gold, we need not wonder at flte interpolation /" Thus has Hakluyt been made, alternately, the theme of extrava gant eulogium and groundless denunciation ! The passage about gold is in the original (fol. 52) precisely as he translates it: " Han- no lingua et lettere separate et cavano Metalli d'ogni sorte et sopra tutto abondano d'Oro et le lor pratiche sono in Engroneland di dove traggono pellerecie, &c." The misconception of later writers Forster's Northern Voyages, p. 189, note 326 is due to a complex piece of roguery running through the several editions of Ramusio. The story of Nicolo and Antonio Zeno gains a footing, for the first time, in the second volume of the Venice edition of 1574, of which there is a copy in the Library of the British Museum The passage of the original representing Estotiland to abound in Gold is found there (fol. 224 A.). But before the next edition came out, the well-known result of Frobisher's magnificent hopes was calcu lated to throw ridicule on such representations. The passage, there fore, disappears from the editions of 1583 and 1606 (fol. 232 A.) The suppression is executed in rather an awkward manner. On turning to the passage indicated of the more recent editions, there will be discovered, at the eleventh line from the top of the page, a chasm in the sense between "cavano" and "di dove.' 5 The sup pression of the intermediate words, which are marked in italics in our quotation from the original, constitutes the fraud, and renders what remains unintelligible. Hakluyt made his translation from the Ramusio of 1574, and not from the original work of Marcolini. This is evident from the fact, that in his translation (vol. iii. p. 124) immediately after the death of Nicolo Zeno, there follows a deduc tion of descent from him to " the other Zenos that are living at this day," of which there is not a syllable in the original (fol. 51), but it is interpolated into the Ramusio of 1574. He escaped the falsifica tion of the edition of 15S3, because his translation was made prior to that time, it having appeared in his early work " Divers Voyages, &c." published in 1582. The matter, then, stands thus. Hakluyt followed a vicious copy, but one which had reached only the first stage of depravation. Those who denounce him merely happen to have got hold of a subsequent edition which has been further tam pered with. Neither party went back to the Original, though by no means a rare book; and it is curious that the critics of Hakluyt, while talking of the "original," had before them neither the original Marcolini, nor the original Ramusio, nor even, if the expression may be used, the original counterfeit of Ramusio. In this last par ticular Hakluyt has the advantage over them. It has been ascertained from Oxford that the tract which figures in the Catalogue of the Bodleian Library is not to be found in a se parate form, but only as an item of the second volume of Ramusio. The person who prepared the Catalogue was doubtless caught by the attractive name of Cabot, and unfortunately gave to it this deceptive prominence. 327 The erroneous citation by Hakluy t (vol. iii. p. 6) of the second volume of Ramusio, instead of the first, was probably occasioned by this tract. Eden had said that the passage containing the Conver sation of Butrigarius was to be found in the Italian History of Navi gations. Hakluyt, in looking over the first and third volumes of Ramusio, found no leading title to catch his attention, whilst the spu rious article in the second volume has the name of Cabot running ostentatiously at the top of the page. He probably conjectured that it was to be found there. Purchas (Pilgrims, vol. iii. p. 807) impli citly follows Hakluyt, and repeats the citation of the second volume. It is remarkable that in The History of Navigation," found in, Churchill's Collection (vol. i. p. Ixxiv.) and usually attributed to Locke, there is an account of the contents of Ramusio, and this item of the second volume is represented as a description of Cabot's Voy age to The North-West!" Another instance of unwarrantable liberty taken with the text of Ramusio, occurs in a passage which has already been cited. In that Conversation, usually connected with the name of Butrigarius, the speaker is described in the edition of 1554 (vol. i. fol. 413, A.) merely as a gentleman, " un gentil'huomo," but in the editions of 1583, 1606, and 1613 (fol. 373), the expression is altered to "un gentil'huomo Mantovano," doubtless from mere conjecture. The fact is remarkable, that owing to the deceptive instructions given for the purchase of this work, there is rarely found in the most carefully selected Libraries an uncorrupted copy one which can be taken up without peril to the reader, at every turn, of being the dupe of rash, or fraudulent, alteration by an unknown editor. Additional matter appearing in 2nd London Edition at Pages 77-78 and mentioned in Preface. To para graph in Text ending "was first discovered by an expedition commissioned to 'set up the banner' of England." The following Note is appended: "A passage in the Interlude of the Nature of the Four Elements" given in Mr. Collier's recent 'Annals of the Stage,' supplies a curious allusion to this fact. The Interlude is by some antiquarians referred to the year 1510, and by others to 1517: "And also what an honorable thynge. Both to the Realme and to the Kynge, To have had his domnynyon extendynge There into so far a grounde Whiche the noble Kynge of late memory. The most wyse prynce, the VII Kerry Caused furst for to bee founde".