TEACHING HIGH-SCHOOL LATIN THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS CHICAGO, ILLINOIS Bgents THE BAKER & TAYLOR COMPANY NEW YORK THE CUNNINGHAM, CURTISS & WELCH COMPANY LOS ANGELES THE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS LONDON AND EDINBURGH THE MARUZEN-KABUSHIKI-KAISHA TOKYO, OSAKA, KYOTO, FUKUOKA, SENDAI THE MISSION BOOK COMPANY SHANGHAI KARLW. HIERSEMANN LEIPZIG TEACHING HIGH-SCHOOL LATIN A HANDBOOK By JOSIAH BETHEA GAME, PH.D. Professor of Ancient Languages, Florida State College for Women THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS CHICAGO, ILLINOIS COPYRIGHT 1916 BY THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO All Rights Reserved Published October 1916 Composed and Printed By The University of Chicago Press Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A. DEDICATED TO PROFESSOR EDWARD PARMELEE MORRIS OF YALE UNIVERSITY 349320 PREFACE This little book represents a revision and enlargement of the Handbook for High-School Teachers of Latin which was published as a bulletin of the Missouri State Normal School, Cape Girardeau, in 1907, while the writer was connected with that institution as professor of Latin and Greek. That bulletin had a surprising popularity. An edition of five thousand was distributed within a short time, mainly in response to requests from all parts of the country. Even after a lapse of more than eight years, calls for copies are frequently received. An earnest effort has been made to prepare a practical manual that will meet some of the immediate needs of the young teacher of Latin. The plans proposed represent actual experience in the high school, the normal school y and the college. They have been tested thoroughly and found effective. They do not represent a final solution of all the problems of the young teacher, but they do represent the best contribution the writer can now make to the cause of better teaching in our schools. Some of the suggestions here given were made originally by Professor C. U. Clark, director of the American Acad- emy, Rome, Italy. My obligation to him is very great. Professors G. J. Laing and F. J. Miller, of the University of Chicago, did me the kindness to read the manuscript and make suggestions which have added very much to the value of the book. Their help is fully appreciated. Professor Francis W. Kelsey, of the University of Michi- gan, gave me permission to use quotations from his excellent viii PREFACE volume, Latin and Greek in American Education. Those who read this book will understand my high appreciation of this favor. Young Latin teachers are doing a large part in educating the rising generation and in upholding scholarly ideals among the people. May this little book serve to strengthen their hands and hearts in their good work. JOSIAH B. GAME TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA August 14, 1916 CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I. LATIN'S IMMEDIATE SERVICE IN EDUCATION ... i II. LATIN'S LARGER SERVICE IN EDUCATION AND IN LIFE . 10 III. CLASSICAL STUDIES ON THE DEFENSIVE 19 IV. THE TEACHER AND His SUBJECT 35 V. THE TRAINING OF THE LATIN TEACHER .... 40 VI. ENGLISH IN LATIN STUDY 47 VII. PUBLIC TESTIMONY TO THE VALUE OF LATIN STUDY . . 52 VIII. THE TEXT: ITS AUTHOR AND PUBLISHER .... 54 IX. FIRST-YEAR LATIN 57 X. SECOND-YEAR LATIN 74 XI. THIRD-YEAR LATIN 87 XII. FOURTH- YEAR LATIN 91 XIII. LATIN PROSE COMPOSITION 96 XIV. THE LATIN BIBLE, LATIN HYMNS, AND SONGS ... 99 ^ XV. CLASSROOM EQUIPMENT FOR THE LATIN DEPARTMENT . 108 XVI. QUESTIONS, WITH ANSWERS AND SUGGESTIONS . . .114 CHAPTER I LATIN'S IMMEDIATE SERVICE IN EDUCATION Latin one of several subjects. For many centuries Latin has held an honored place in the schools of Europe and America, and during much of that time it has been one of three or four subjects whose material has been so organized that they could be used as effective educational instruments. Within the last half-century a number of other subjects have been developed, that is, have been found to possess a valuable content, and about that qontent has been grouped a literature sufficient for successful use in the schools. Of late there has been a rather unfortunate tendency to force into this company of tested subjects an almost indefinite number which have no certain content, no organized literature, and no record of achievement. Some of these proposed subjects may some day prove worthy of acceptance, but they should not be urged unduly. If they are to have a place, it should be a place of their own. They should not crowd out other subjects which have rendered effective service. In the work of educating the people, every subject which can do a definite work and secure definite results should have its place. Where more than one are known to reach the same result, that one should have the preference which secures the immediate result sought and which has the largest margin in other related results. Why do we teach Latin in the schools? Latin and mathematics have had more than a fair share of the criti- cism of those who would find something wrong with our 2 TEACHING HIGH-SCHOOL LATIN educational system. This is especially true of Latin because there seems to be a mistaken idea of what can fairly be expected of Latin in the schools. Now and then an extremist seems to blame Latin for not doing all those things which are expected of all the high-school subjects combined. In rare instances a warm defender of Latin takes about the same point of view and claims credit for all that is accomplished. Neither position is correct or reasonable. Many of those who from experience know the possi- bilities of Latin are persuaded that a well-trained teacher can reach more phases of a young man's education by using Latin than by using any other single subject. This may well be the attitude of every teacher toward his subject, but he must be careful not to undervalue the work of other teachers, or to claim as his own results which he is only a sharer in securing. Latin has a certain rather definite part in our educational scheme, and it behooves the faithful teacher to know what he is expected to accomplish and to see, first of all, that his energies are exerted in that direction. In indicating the ends which we may reasonably expect to attain in teaching Latin, it seems a satisfactory plan to give the statements prepared by men who have 'all the facts well in hand. a) Professor Foster, New York City. The more imme- diate purpose of the Latin teacher is well set out in this quotation from Professor W. E. Foster, of the Stuyvesant High School, New York City, in " Reorganization of Sec- ondary Education/' a bulletin of the United States Bureau of Education: The following are some of the aims which seem worth while: to enrich the English vocabulary, both in the addition of new words LATIN'S SERVICE IN EDUCATION 3 and particularly by a more perfect mastery and clear understanding of many of the words already in use; to develop an appreciation of word, phrase, and clause relations; to teach clearness and accuracy of expression, both oral and written; to develop habits of industry and application; to make the pupil an intelligent critic of his own oral and written speech and that of others; to lay a good foundation for the study of English and other modern languages; to read some of the great Latin masterpieces; "to give a wider view of life through familiarity with a great civilization remote from the present, both in time and place, 'in the cool, calm air of noncontemporaneous events.' " Many of the results of the successful teaching of Latin just men- tioned are, so to speak, by-products. It is worthy of remark that these so-called by-products of the study of Latin the illumination of an English word, of a grammatical principle, or of a fundamental law of language, the casual remark that throws a suggestive side- light upon some vital fact of history, of law, of religious and social custom, and upon civilization in general are the things which cling in the memory long after one has lost the ability to translate a passage from Cicero or to classify a subjunctive or an ablative. b} Professor Kelsey, University of Michigan. The following quotation from Latin and Greek in American Education, p. 21, gives a very complete and comprehensive summary of the purposes back of Latin teaching: Specifically, Latin and Greek become effective as educational instruments in at least seven different ways: By training in the essentials of scientific method: observation, com- parison, generalization; By making our own language intelligible and developing the power of expression; By bringing the mind into contact with literature in elemental forms; By giving insight into a basic civilization ; By cultivating the constructive imagination; By clarifying moral ideals, and stimulating to right conduct; By furnishing means of recreation. Of these, the sixth and seventh belong more particularly to the discussion of the chapter which follows. 4 TEACHING HIGH-SCHOOL LATIN c) Professor Laurie, University of Edinburgh. In his volume Lectures on Language and Linguistic Method, chap, ix, Professor Laurie gives the following " reasons for teaching Latin ": We teach Latin 1. Because as a formal and grammatical study it has peculiar advantages, and more than any other language (except Greek) gives discipline to the intelligence, and the result of discipline, viz., intel- lectual power. 2. The study of Latin gives (to an Englishman at least), more than any other language can do, a training in words the relative values and the functions of words and, consequently, training in the thought-things which words denote. The shades of meaning in vocables are brought into high relief. 3. The analysis and subsequent synthesis whereby we truly comprehend an English sentence, and which is a direct training of the processes of mind in knowing (in the scientific or any other field), are most effective as training when it is a foreign tongue that we are teaching; and, above all, when that tongue is Latin. This is because, in order to produce an English translation, a pupil is forced, whether he will or not, deliberately and of set purpose to consider the mutual relations of the parts of a complex sentence; and, secondly, because of the exactness and precision with which these logical relations are brought into prominence in a highly synthetic language. In this relation, Latin is better than Greek, because there is less deviation in it from a normal type. There is breadth, strength, and simplicity about its grammar. .... 4. The working out of a translation from a foreign tongue is further a training of the imagination, which has to bring itself into play in order to unite into a whole, in their true signification, the parts of a sentence. Latin in a special sense gives this training because of its remoteness. The imagination, moreover, is checked and kept within the wholesome bounds of truthfulness by comparing the results achieved with the original. 5. Latin is to a very large extent (to the extent of two-thirds at least) our own tongue. In studying Latin, therefore, we are studying our own tongue in its sources, and getting all the discipline LATIN'S SERVICE IN EDUCATION 5 and nutrition of mind which flows from the study of the origin and history of words. Latin enables us to revivify our own tongue for ourselves. Nay, we are studying our own language in much of its syntactical mould also, as may be seen by reading our early prose writers, and even those of the eighteenth century. 6. It follows from the preceding reason that in studying Latin we are brought face to face with modern conceptions as to moral duties, social relations, and legal obligations in their origins, and that we thus undergo a kind of unconscious philosophical training suited to the as yet immature mind, and moulding its conceptions from the foundation. Dr. W. T. Harris, Education Commissioner for the United States, says: "One may say that of a hundred boys, fifty of whom had studied Latin for a period of six months, while the other fifty had not studied Latin at all, the fifty with the smattering of Latin would possess some slight impulse towards analyzing the legal and political view of human life, and surpass the other fifty in that direction. Placed on a distant frontier with a task of building a new civilization, the fifty with a smattering of Latin would furnish the law -makers and political rulers, legislators, and builders of state." This may be an exaggeration, but there is an element of truth in it. In any case, Latin is not a dead language. Its influence is still living in our own tongue, our thought, our feeling, our institutions, our law, our religion, our polity. A language does not cease to live because it ceases to be spoken. 7. In studying Latin we are taking possession of the key of the Romance languages, shortening the time needed for acquiring these by at least one-half. 8. The study of Latin introduces the pupil in its later stages to a conscious discernment of art in language the artistic and beautiful in expression and this to a degree which no modern tongue can do, because, first, of its chaste severity of form, and, secondly, because being-aoJar removed from our own time, we can look at it as a fresh and alien object. Thus by contrast our implicit feelings regarding literary form in our own tongue are brought into explicit conscious- ness raised, in short, from vague feeling into knowledge. 9. The study of Latin, especially in its later stages, when it is accompanied by the study of the life, art, and literature of Rome, has a remarkable influence on the tone of thought and character. It has 6 TEACHING HIGH-SCHOOL LATIN influence by connecting us in a living way with what seems, but truly is not, a dead past, and thereby expanding our intellectual and moral sympathies so as to embrace that past as part of our own life. It makes us members of a larger human society. Modern contemporary language and life are too near to our own to have this cultivating influence to the same extent, and do not teach us to see things in a true perspective; they may be said to broaden our lives, but they do not lengthen them. Neither the Hindu nor the Chinese language and life would serve, because they are not our past. The ancient life, by thus stimulating the historical imagination and carrying it out of the present, tends to give balance of mind, checks sciolism of opinion and crudeness of judgment based on a narrow induction of things which, as being close at hand, are apt to assume undue im- portance. The true humanity of the growing boy is thus deepened and strengthened. Of these, the sixth and ninth belong more particularly to the discussion of the following chapter. d) Mr. Charles R. Williams, editor of the ''Indianapolis News." In an address before the Michigan Schoolmasters' Club, Editor Charles R. Williams, speaking on "The Study of Latin and Greek as a Training for Practical Affairs/' gave the following summary of the results which follow classical study: For a man that seeks to be a leader in the practical life of the world the study of the humanities, of Greek and Latin, is to be recom- mended and urged, therefore, because of the thorough understanding and mastery of English that it gives; because of the discipline of the intellectual powers it affords, in determining the precise meaning of an author's discourse; because of the knowledge gained of the sources ctf our own language, our institutions, and our culture; because of the cultivation of taste that comes thereby for all that is high and fine in literature and art; because of the wider vision it gives to the spirit of men, and because it deepens one's sense of the continuity of culture, of the solidarity of the race, of our debt to the past, and so of our obligation to the future. LATIN'S SERVICE IN EDUCATION 7 Summary of results. These statements of the results which should follow Latin study are about as complete as any that can be found. A close examination of them seems to lead up to the following groups : GROUP I 1. Enrichment of the English vocabulary. New words are added, and their exact values and meanings, together with those of familiar words, are understood. 2. Accurate knowledge of the English sentence. Its analysis and synthesis, with appreciation of word, phrase, and clause relations, become fixed in mind. 3. The foundation is laid for modern-language study, in particular the Romance languages. The Teutonic languages are made easier by reason of training in foreign language. GROUP II 1. An insight into the Roman civilization, its laws, customs, religion, and ordinary life, with a consequent appreciation of our indebtedness to the past. 2. Contact with the world's great past and with one of the world's great literatures. GROUP III 1. Habits of industry and intense application. 2. Clearness and accuracy of thought and expression and intel- ligent criticism of oral and written speech. 3. Development of literary taste and of interest in art and litera- ture. 4. Mental discipline and the consequent development of intellec- tual power. GROUP IV Under this heading may be included that larger service rendered by Latin in education and in life which is touched upon in these statements but discussed more at length in the succeeding chapter. u Who is equal to these things?" One who examines this list wonders whether all of these things can be 8 TEACHING HIGH-SCHOOL LATIN accomplished by Latin, and, if so, whether anything is left for the other subjects taught in the high schools. Not all these results can be hoped for from the high- school courses in Latin, as will be seen later on. Evidence in unmeasured quantity is available to prove that Latin in the hands of a well-educated man can do large things in securing these results. There may be other means avail- able, but the evidence is not so complete or irresistible. One difference between the Latin teacher and his fellow- teacher is that he is able to work with chart and compass in hand, if he will, and may know what port he is making for and what he is expected to declare when he enters the harbor. The Latin teacher may not succeed in doing all the things enumerated; most probably he will not; but he is limited only by the capacity of the class, measured by its preparation and native strength, and by a just regard for the other departments that have claim on the pupil's time. Therefore to his great relief, he may have before him a fairly dependable statement of his duties. The teacher's task. i. Teach Latin, and teach Latin for its own sake. By this is meant that you are to see to it that the amount of work in Latin apportioned to each year is taught as thoroughly and perfectly as your ability and that of the class will permit. The exact work required in each year is indicated in the discussions which are given on another page. Your prime task is to see, to the best of your ability, that the Latin assigned is learned as to forms, constructions, vocabularies, reading, writing. This task, if well done, will secure in a fair measure the results shown in group I. These results will appear more abundantly after further study in college Latin, but you LATIN'S SERVICE IN EDUCATION 9 may have group I to your credit, anyway. The other groups, especially II and III, will be slightly affected also by this first task. It may be that this is all that your class can be held to. If so, your part is done. 2. Teach Latin for the pupil's sake. This is in fact our only reason for teaching anything. By laying aside this consideration for the moment, as is suggested above, certain results can be obtained which are in themselves desirable. When those smaller results have been obtained, this larger task confronts you the task of so teaching Latin that the pupil's mental horizon continually enlarges and that he becomes more fully possessed of his own natural resources. Rules cannot be laid down for this part of the task as they can for the teaching of syntax, and yet the real teacher sees his opportunity and uses it in making the way for a good habit or a noble resolution. This second task, if well done, will secure the results enumerated in groups II and III, and affect strongly those referred to in group IV. The teacher may make more sure of group II than of group III or IV, in the very nature of the case, but all these results will be larger and more pronounced if the pupil's study is continued in college. The high school can only make a reasonable beginning in the way of securing the larger results on which life and destiny depend. CHAPTER II LATIN'S LARGER SERVICE IN EDUCATION AND IN LIFE Latin's hold upon public confidence. Latin has had a place in the schools of Europe and America for many cen- turies and is now being studied by more young men and young women than at any other time in the world's his- tory. Men like Herbert Spencer have tried to break this hold that Latin has had upon the confidence of the public, but they have not been wholly successful. Young people continue to elect Latin, even against the opposition of administrative officers, and their parents approve the choice. The people of our country are so firmly con- vinced of the effectiveness of Latin that we have very few high schools which do not offer that subject. Those which do not offer Latin are generally discredited, and it is rather seldom that a young man who has aspira- tions of real scholarship will voluntarily attend such a school. Why this clinging to Latin ? There is a reason for this persistent holding to Latin. Other subjects are widely heralded as substitutes, and Latin is decried by various agencies, but all to little avail. Why do parents encourage their sons and daughters to study Latin rather than one of the proffered substitutes ? There are several reasons for this, but probably the one which more than all others grips people and gains friends for the study of Latin is the emphatic indorsement given it by many of our country's noblest and best men, who have not hesitated to express their indebtedness to classical LATIN'S SERVICE IN EDUCATION AND IN LIFE n study and to attribute to it much of their own success in life. This is and has been a stone wall against which the charges of anti-Latinists have fallen flat. Hundreds who are recognized as the strong men of the nation have given evidence as to the value derived in their own lives from the study of Greek and Latin, but have said very little of other subjects. The evidence of great men is conclusive. It is the merest folly to undertake to set aside the emphatic evidence of statesmen, business men, bankers, lawyers, physicians, ministers, engineers, scientists, and others in large numbers, such as was given at the classical conferences held at the University of Michigan. Among these witnesses were such men as Drs. Vaughan, De Nancrede, and Hinsdale of the university medical faculty; Professors Saddler, Patterson, Williams, and Davis of the engineering faculty; Mr. Merritt Starr and Mr. Lyndon Evans of the Chicago bar; Dean Hutchens of the university law faculty; Hon. Harlow P. Davock, Hon. Levi I. Barbour, and Hon. Hinton E. Spalding of the Detroit bar; Hon. James Bryce, then ambassador from Great Britain; Hon. John W. Foster, Hon. James Brown Scott, and Dr. Harvey W. Wiley of Washington; and Mr. Charles Williams of Indianapolis. All these, and others in goodly numbers, were outspoken in their support of the classics, and nearly every one of the speakers recognized the service which had been rendered to himself. Recent testimony from President Wilson, Ex-President Taft, Hon. John D. Long, Dr. Lyman Abbott, Mr. S. S. McClure, Mr. C. P. Steinmetz, and others, is familiar to those who regularly read the Classical Weekly and the Classical Journal. 12 TEACHING HIGH-SCHOOL LATIN These men are as capable of giving competent evidence as are any men who ever lived. If they recognize the worth of classical study and favor its continuance as an educational instrument, the mere faddist or the educa- tional revolutionist may shout himself hoarse. Sensible men who want to make the best possible citizens out of their children will persist in holding to the studies which have a record writ large in the lives of our best men and women. The classics in character-building. Most fathers recognize the fact that their sons and daughters have a limited period of time available for their education. They are anxious that during this time the foundation be laid on which strong character may be builded. Many of them know from their own experience, others from evidence such as has been referred to, that Latin has been credited with doing large things in the way of character-building. They do not wish to experiment with the destiny of their own children, and in consequence they hold fast to "the old ways." Very few men want their sons to grow up into the type of citizen that is represented by the educational agitator, but all would gladly have their sons follow in the footsteps of such men as those who have been mentioned as friendly to the classics. Generally, and in the colleges in particular, Latin has been taught by strong men of unquestioned integrity, and their strength has been potent in doubling the value of the subject which they have taught. Latin furnished them an effective means of directing the development of the young men who studied in their classes. Perhaps they could have done good work in character-building with some other subject, but the point is that they did accomplish what LATIN'S SERVICE IN EDUCATION AND IN LIFE 13 they did with Latin as their instrument. And Latin is just as readily available today as it ever was. It is submitted then that much of the firmness of the public's hold upon the classics is due to a fixed belief that in some way these subjects have a decided bearing upon the developing of character in the young. The charge that Latin is not a practical subject has been waived in favor of the consideration that it does a larger service in enabling the student to store up in mind and heart those permanent resources which come forth as from a never-failing store- house when their master has need. So long as Latin study continues to contribute so largely to human society, men and women will call for its help in making citizens and noble characters. The immediate and the larger service. In the state- ments given in the previous chapter, which bore more directly upon the immediate work of the Latin teacher, it was noticed that the larger service loomed up high even by the very side of the more immediate; that those whose statements were quoted invariably led up to or pointed to the larger service of Latin study as, after all, quite as important as the smaller and more immediate. In other words, the immediate was apparently regarded as a door- way to the larger and more vital. The educator who recog- nizes the fact that education amounts to nothing except as it develops the larger phases of human character and makes for the sum of human betterment has indeed found the secret of real service. Very generally Latin is credited with effectiveness in the hands of such educators. Perhaps the best way to bring out this larger service, as coupled with and following the more immediate, is to present the evidence of men who are recognized as competent witnesses. 14 TEACHING HIGH-SCHOOL LATIN The evidence of Mr. James Loeb. The following state- ment concludes an address made by Mr. James Loeb, of Kuhn, Loeb & Co., bankers: The great and legitimate aim of a business man is to make money, to provide for himself and his family such luxuries and comforts as his tastes and social standing demand. But when a man has reached the goal of his desires, when he has made his pile and wants to enjoy it, then comes the time for the making of the real and only balance sheet. Then he must ask himself, " What are my resources, now that I have everything that money can buy ? What are my spiritual and intellectual assets ? How can I best spend what is left to me of life ? " Lucky is the man whose early training fits him for something more than the golf field, or the tennis court, and for something better than the gaming-table when his days of business activity are over. He can taste the gentler pleasures that await him in his study and by the blazing hearth-fire. His Sophocles or his Homer or his Catullus will make the winter of life seem like its early spring, when the greatest struggle he knew was with the elusive rules of grammar and syntax. As seen by Mr. William Sloane. The following state- ment is taken from an address by Mr. William Sloane, president of W. and J. Sloane, bankers : A business man who has had a classical education cannot fail to remember with reverence and affection those patient, consecrated men who taught him Latin and Greek, and awoke in him a love for the beautiful. Such men as these, with ideals, he perhaps no longer meets in his daily vocation. With the passing years he may have forgotten the very names of the classics he read at college; but the memory of those days, of those men, of their enthusiasm in their work, has had its effect on the man himself and he is better for it, and I believe a better business man, too ; for unconsciously he has acquired something which he values as a precious possession, a something which distinguishes him from his fellows and makes him singularly happy in his work. We must look after the man himself. In this connec- tion it is proper to call attention to the necessity of making LATIN'S SERVICE IN EDUCATION AND IN LIFE 15 the man himself the center of educational interest. We have had a somewhat strenuous campaign in the interest of highly specialized scientists, engineers, mechanics, and operatives, and the end has been fairly well attained, but there is ground for complaint in the type of men thus obtained. It is being felt more and more that a sane education must include primarily such development and training as will render the man's nature refined and en- nobled, will awake him to lofty endeavor, and will bring him into sympathy with what is noblest and best in life in his own life and in the world in which he moves. This fuller training for a place in the world as a complete man is wholly independent of the question of a training for any trade or profession which it does not exclude, of course; but the emphasis is changed from an apparently essential one to one which the whole world will recognize as abso- lutely real and fundamental. A man may be a splendidly trained farmer, or mechanic, or even professional man, and may be able to make money in abundance; but if he is not more than these things, does life really mean much to him ? Is he broadly sympathetic toward what is best in the world of art and letters ? Does he see anything in painting, or sculpture, or in music ? Do these have any message for him ? Does he find a friend in great books ? Do the spirits of great and good men commune with his spirit as he goes about his daily toil ? Rather, is there not a danger that his life will be hollow; that he will be lacking in a spirit of true humility and of appreciation of the rights of others; that tie will become hard, unfeeling, ungenerous, and self-centered; that he will be dependent upon public amusements for his highest 1 6 TEACHING HIGH-SCHOOL LATIN pleasures ? Will not those finer qualities of nature forsake the man who does not cultivate them, in whose mind a permanent place has not been prepared for their in- dwelling ? After the living is made, then what? We all recognize the importance of professional and vocational training, and Latinists have done their part in promoting the interests of the subjects which bear upon the problem of making a living. After the living is made, then what ? It is not enough that a man be a good mechanic, or farmer, or even physician, lawyer, or teacher his educa- tion must stand or fall by whether he is, in addition, a man of catholic spirit, with an appreciation of the higher and better things of life, or merely first, last, and all the time, a servant of his trade or profession. Nature has much to do with these qualities; but it is submitted that an education which neglects the culture element, which fails to take these native forces and to polish and refine them for the happiness of the possessor, and for the service of the common good, by reason of this neglect is a destroyer of what heaven meant for a blessing to society. Professional training is a necessity, but it should not be so coldly professional, should not so severely stress the making of a professional out of the man, that he will become not more than a mechanical device, that he will fail to become a full, open-minded, generous-hearted man. The training of the man should have the first place, and the training for a livelihood should be secondary. The case of Darwin. This severe application to the material, to the exclusion of higher things, is well repre- sented in a statement of Charles Darwin, as found in his autobiography: LATIN'S SERVICE IN EDUCATION AND IN LIFE 17 Up to the age of thirty and beyond it, poetry of many kinds, such as the works of Milton, Gray, Byron, Wordsworth, Coleridge, Shelley, gave me great delight, and even as a schoolboy I took intense delight in Shakespeare. But now for many years I cannot read a line of poetry; I have tried. to read Shakespeare, and found it so intolerably dull that it nauseated me. I have lost my taste for pic- tures, and for music. My mind seems to have become a kind of machine for grinding general laws out of a large collection of facts, but why this should have caused the atrophy of that part of the brain on which the higher tastes depend, I cannot conceive The loss of these tastes is a loss of happiness, and may possibly be injurious to the intellect, and more probably to the moral character, by enfeeb- ling the emotional part of our nature. On this Professor Walter Miller says : If Charles Darwin found the loss of his higher aesthetic tastes so lamentable, how much more lamentable must be the paralysis of the intellectual power when this exclusive devotion to the culti- vation of one side of the intellectual nature begins before the mind has fairly developed. But utilitarianism, with promises of material wealth, is ready with her reply: "Seek ye first money; culture after wealth," and technical education without the basis of broad culture has grown and spread to an incredible extent. Said President Butler: "Its essential narrowness and philistinism increase with its success in establishing itself, and it promises for a long time to come to assert its overwhelming ascendancy, until a race of men shall come upon the stage with about as much religion as a threshing-machine, and hardly more social charm than a storage battery." 1 Mr. Williams, in conclusion. This bearing of the classics upon the larger and more vital phases of human life can hardly be presented more convincingly than in these words, taken from the address already referred to, of Mr. Williams of the Indianapolis News: It does make a difference, a very great and momentous difference, to my notion, what a youth studies in his formative and impression- 1 Southern Educational Review, IV, 104. 1 8 TEACHING HIGH-SCHOOL LATIN able years. He is to gain discipline, he is to win mastery over him- self, to learn to use his intellectual powers; but if he can attain these necessary ends and at the same time be adding vastly to his spiritual resources, to the comfort of his soul, to the joy of his true life in the years to come, when the cares and responsibilities and distractions of professional and business activity shall absorb his time and energy, should not those subjects for study be preferred which shall enable him most easily to bring about these most desirable results? Let us never long leave out of our thought that life is not mere getting and spending, mere sowing and reaping, mere material success, of whatever form. That is only the basis for something better and higher and more enduring. And so, especially for the young man that hopes to be a leader in the professional and business life of the time, in finance and affairs of state in practical life, in a word those studies are to be preferred which shall make him more a man, give him a wider outlook, a larger prospect of life, quicken his power of vision, enlarge his range of sympathy and appreciation, and bring him into the fullest conscious- ness of the sources and development of the culture we enjoy. .... It makes a man more a man, the more he knows of what men afore- time have borne and done and thought. The most practical man, in the final survey o*f human life, is the one who puts the emphasis on man and not on practical; who is never too absorbed in the cares and triumphs .of life to ask himself soberly now and then: "What shall it profit a man if he shall gain the whole world and lose his own soul?" CHAPTER III CLASSICAL STUDIES ON THE DEFENSIVE Searching criticism of the classics. At the very outset the young Latin teacher must know something of the storm of criticism through which classical studies have passed within recent years. Many strong friends of the classics have had their confidence shaken not a little by the bold opposition on the one hand, and the rather timid reticence of classical teachers on the other hand. However, there have been strong defenders who have done splendid service in the cause of sane education, and to them is due, in no small measure, the forceful defense which eventually resulted in a partial victory. In order that young teachers may know something of the attacks made upon classical studies in the schools, the main opponents and their argu- ments are here noted, and, in turn, criticized: i. Promoters of educational fads. The faddist has always been the most uncompromising foe of Latin and Greek. He has an idea which will revolutionize education, but foolish people will not accept it immediately, because they are busy with something else! If they would only turn from these dead languages and take his fad instead, the world would blossom as the rose ! Regular attendants at public educational conventions look for "some new thing." Just how these faddists and promoters of educational piffle invariably manage to secure the choice places on the programs is rather hard to under- gtand. They are always on hand, and always they turn their little guns on Latin and Greek. They say about the 19 20 TEACHING HIGH-SCHOOL LATIN worst that they know when they call these "dead lan- guages' 7 and "the fetish of fogyism." These men are sel- dom called to account. In fact, it is very rare that the friends of classical learning are given a place on these programs. However, fads come and go, but Latin abides. Its very presence in a high school compels good standards of scholarship in other subjects and in this way possibly has helped to bring disaster to the various fads. Something has had this effect, for anyone who will count up the "dead fads" of the past twenty-five years will find that their name is legion. The young Latin teacher may not hope to convince an extremist of this kind. The best one can do is to counter- act, in so far as is possible, the temporary effect of such extremists. 2. Friends of the newer subjects. What is said above may apply here with equal force, in many instances. Too often those who would urge the newer subjects on our schools seem to think that they can secure a place only by removing Latin from the list of studies offered. This is not a very wise or fair proceeding. Latin teachers and the friends of the classics generally are as firm friends of the newer subjects as are their most earnest promoters, in so far as they have proved themselves worthy of a place in the curriculum. Some, as for instance, in the domestic and strictly technical arts, have done this excellently, while others are still in the experimental stage and will never get beyond it, regardless of the place of classical studies or anything else. Latin has sought no quarrel even with the most doubtful of the newer subjects. Latin teachers know that not every pupil can succeed in Latin study. CLASSICAL STUDIES ON THE DEFENSIVE 21 Some minds are best adapted to strictly technical and manual effort, and should be guided in that direction. Such subjects should have fair treatment, but this does not mean that Latin should quietly submit to unfair treatment. 3. Friends of the modern languages. Some years ago, when the modern languages began to be taken seriously as fit subjects for the high schools, some controversy naturally arose between the defenders of the modern lan- guages and those of the classics, which were in a measure displaced in favor of the newer languages. This has prac- tically disappeared, in so far as the teachers of these sub- jects are concerned. Now and then, however, someone brings to the front one of the long-discarded arguments for displacing the classics with German and French, and for this reason these arguments must be examined. The one most commonly used, and the least understood, is that of utility. " These young people should study German and French, for they may have a chance to use it in talking with the natives." To state an argument in this way is to expose its futility. Perhaps they may, but most likely they will not have any need to talk with native Germans and Frenchmen. Suppose they do, then what ? Must they study for four years or more in order to be able to talk a little, and badly, with a native who gets keen amusement out of the blunderers ? Invariably such linguists must have recourse to their English to explain just what they are trying to say. More than that, it is fair to say that outside of the great cities not one high- school student in ten ever thinks of trying to talk in a foreign language, even if he has a chance. If he needs a frankfurter, or a cheese, or something else from a store kept by a foreigner, he calls for it just as he would if he had 22 TEACHING HIGH-SCHOOL LATIN never heard of any except his native tongue. Such "sprechen Sie" German and " parlez- vous " French have no established educational value. But suppose that the foreign languages, German and French, for instance, are taught primarily with a view to their fluent use. What is achieved then? Cannot the waiters at the larger hotels speak several languages under- standingly ? Are they to be counted as bright particular stars on this account ? If we are making the conversational factor of prime importance, we might secure more satis- factory results by sending our young men and young women to France or Germany for a few months, for this is practi- tically the only way to get a conversational grasp of a foreign language. The fact is, our schools do not turn out graduates who have a working knowledge of the languages which they have studied. If modern languages are a utility only in so far as they are spoken by those who study them, they are a failure. For many years they have had a choice place in the school curriculum, and, except for a few short sentences, those who have studied German and French know no more of them as conversational languages than Latin pupils know of conversational Latin. Let the reader make a test of the people who were in school with him and studied the modern languages while he studied Latin. However, modern-language teachers do not now stress the conversational factor to any large extent. They are gradually approaching the methods long used in teaching ancient languages, that is, striving to train the language- sense, to secure accuracy in expression and interpretation, to awaken sympathy with what is best in the world's store of learning, art, and literature, and to develop in the student CLASSICAL STUDIES ON THE DEFENSIVE 23 a feeling of " at-homeness " in the atmosphere of the best thought and endeavor of all the ages. As these purposes become established, the very question of conversational language is lost from the reckoning. Whether these ends can be secured better by using one of the two ancient languages, or one of the main modern languages, may be left for others to decide. The evidence in favor of the classics seems overwhelming. From this it is plain that modern-language teaching is not very different from ancient-language teaching. If we may believe the evidence furnished by Professor W. R. Price, state inspector of modern languages in New York, given in the School Review, XXII, 98-102, many of those who teach modern languages in the high schools are poorly prepared indeed. The interests of the ancient and the modern languages are very similar, in fact identical. If the philistine could drive Latin out of the schools, German and French would go out early the next day thereafter. Latin teachers should recognize the value of modern languages and should encourage those pupils with whom they have influence to get all the German and French for which they can find time. 4. Friends of the sciences. The situation of the sciences is much like that of the modern languages. Some few friends of the sciences, especially teachers whose own training has been narrow and has limited their vision, have even advocated violent measures. They have urged that the classics be cast out entirely, and that the work of educating the young be handed over to them. To their thinking, utility is the end of education, and their state- ment of the case of the classics shows these subjects to be worse than useless. Latin is not in the group of utility 24 TEACHING HIGH-SCHOOL LATIN subjects, nor is anything else which is not immediately serviceable in making a living! We were told that the sciences were utility subjects. The public accepted the arguments, and, while Latin was not removed from the schools, large room was made for the sciences. Large sums of money were devoted to science departments, fine laboratories were equipped, and every demand made by the teachers had a very friendly hearing. That science teaching has been of great service in the high schools, within recent years, we are all glad to acknowledge. That it has done all the wonderful things which were promised, no one believes; that science in the high schools has proved a utility the great service which was promised is wholly without any foundation. In the very nature of the case, the sciences are a utility only to those who work along applied lines, and thus keep step with the advances and changing theories of the author- ities. As a test of this statement, let the man who studied physics or chemistry thirty years ago compare his old text with a recent text on that subject. His old text is out of date, utterly absurd, and even dangerous. The science of thirty years ago, or of twenty, or even of ten, is a "dead science/ 7 and no language ever looked so dead as does "dead science." In actual school work, science has as many shortcomings as Latin or anything else. High-school pupils are not proving themselves active or efficient investigators. Gen- erally they do the required work in just as dull and heavy a way as they study their foreign language. In too many cases, they work for credit toward graduation and think very little about original investigation. The danger of relying too largely upon the sciences as educational instru- CLASSICAL STUDIES ON THE DEFENSIVE 25 ments in the high schools is well set forth in the following passage from an address by Professor E. A. Hayden: Laboratory experiments multiplied beyond all reason; labora- tory manuals so minute in their specifications that no place is left to the student for that effort and rumination which is indispensable to the growth of strong mental tissue; inadequate mathematical preparation for physics that makes the subject largely a juggling of apparatus and mechanical application of predigested formulae to concrete data; geometry boiled down until its real essence and spirit the intuitive apprehension of spatial magnitudes is com- pletely volatilized these are a few of the results of this feverish passion for obvious external results. Mere activity, mere busyness that expends itself in tinkering with an infinitude of trifling details, is a sheer waste of time and energy. Reference may be made here, with great timeliness, to an experience in the history of education in Germany. In 1870 the German government asked the University of Berlin to consider the admission of graduates of the Realschule to the university on equal terms with those of the Gymnasium, whose training is based largely on the classics, indicating in this request that the Realschule afforded an equivalent preparation for advanced study. The philosophical faculty replied that the non-classical training is incapable of furnishing a preparation for academic studies equal to that afforded by classical training; that all efforts to find a substitute for the classical languages, whether in mathematics, or in the modern languages, or in the natural sciences, have hitherto been unsuccessful; that after long and vain search we must come back finally to the result of centuries of experience, that the surest instrument that can be used in the training of the minds of the youth is given to us in the languages, the literature, and the works of art of classical antiquity. In spite of this, the government opened up the univer- sities to" the graduates of these technical high schools. 26 TEACHING HIGH-SCHOOL LATIN After ten years of experimenting, the entire faculty, professors of natural and physical sciences included, declared that in spite of the start gained in scientific study by the graduates of the technical schools, they were speedily overtaken by the graduates of the classical institutions, and left in the rear. The entire faculty petitioned the government to repeal its decree and to admit to the uni- versity only such students as had received the training of the classics, as the only adequate training for university study. On this petition were the names of Liebig, Helm- holtz, Hoffmann, Rammelsberg, Mommsen, Curtius, and others of equal fame. 1 From this discussion it must not be inferred that the writer is opposed to the teaching of the sciences in our schools. He believes most strongly in these subjects as educational instruments. Notwithstanding all that has been said about the possibilities of science instruction, the results seem to fall very far short. The sciences should hold a place in the high-school course, and our young people should study science, utility or no utility. No one can pretend to have an education who does not know something of science, but he must be prepared to unlearn it every few years, in the very nature of the case. The teachers of Latin are as good friends of the sciences as can be found, notwithstanding the effort to alienate them. For a kind of training which is essential, that which leads to habits of investigation and patient searching after facts in a given case and of following them to their definite conclusion, the sciences when properly taught have a place that nothing else can fill. When it comes to training in chaste and accurate expression of the facts ascertained, 1 Miller, Southern Educational Review, IV, 100. CLASSICAL STUDIES ON THE DEFENSIVE 27 the sciences can do very little, and must give this task over to subjects which are known to secure this very result. Both the sciences and the foreign languages have fields ready at hand, with work rather definitely outlined. Students in the classics should be encouraged to get all the science courses possible, and teachers of the sciences who are thinking of the interests of their pupils, rather than of petty wrangles about the utility of science, will urge upon their classes the claims of the languages, ancient and modern. 5. Other objections. a) "A waste of time": This is an objection which can be made only by those who do not know what is done by the various subjects taught in the schools, and it holds about as well against one subject as another. Reducing the matter to the last word, we all know that men have lived and done well without knowing anything about Latin, as they have done without a knowledge of grammar, arithmetic, algebra, geometry, or even of reading and writing. This is, however, very poor evidence to show that they would not have done better if they had learned these things at the right time. In fact, if we take out all the subjects which may seem unnecessary, that is, which have no direct bearing on making a living, and then take from the others the parts which arp of no practical use, we shall have very little left. Take mathematics, for instance. The average business man has little use for anything beyond simple arithmetic, and no use for much of that. If he buys, the seller furnishes the figures by which he must pay, and even he uses a form book in which the prices are all worked out. If he sells, he uses the ready-made tables. If he goes to the bank, the cashier turns to his form book and the transaction is completed. 28 TEACHING HIGH-SCHOOL LATIN His adding is done by a machine, and his dictaphone and typewriter remove the necessity of his knowing anything more than how and where to stamp his name with a rubber stamp. What need then has the average business man for difficult arithmetic, or algebra, or plane or solid geom- etry, to say nothing of higher mathematics ? More than this, one of the great civil engineers of the country recently stated that he had gone over his old texts in mathematics to find out just how much of the mathematics he studied in school had been used in his actual experience as head of the engineering department of one of the great railway systems. He made the amazing statement that every- thing he had used, of all the mathematics he had studied, could be given in a booklet of about twenty-four pages. It is doubtful whether he could have grasped and retained this essential knowledge without the training he had received in dealing with what he considers the nonessential part. His feeling that he could have done so makes his contribution all the more interesting. This reasoning holds of other subjects, such as physics, chemistry, history, English, geography, and the like. We may as well understand that there is no intention, in any sane educational system, of cramming into a pupil the few data necessary for earning a livelihood. This is not the great task of the schools. One needs a trained mind in order to be able to make intelligent use of these rules, tables, and similar data; and to give this trained mind, we have found nothing better suited than mathematics, physics, chemistry, and the like. Latin does require time, but the time is not wasted. Education is a growth, not a list of tables and schedules. Time is necessary, and it is the task of the educator to CLASSICAL STUDIES ON THE DEFENSIVE 29 plan for the use of this time so as to secure the best results in trained efficiency. The time element must have fair consideration in any educational scheme. Young America, they tell us, is in a hurry, and he wants a short route to the educational goal. He does not object especially to an education if he can get it on the run and painlessly. Even good business men scold the schools for holding young men so long, while electricity and flying- machines are moving things in terms of miles in place of the rods of other days. Sane education recognizes the fact that while some things have surpassed the rate of progress of a hundred years ago, still seedtime and harvest are now just as far apart as they were in the leisurely days of old Methuselah, the seasons are the same, and the period of physical development is the same. Some processes cannot be hastened without great loss. Mental processes, mental development require time, time, time, and there is no escape from the fact. It has been well said that when the Almighty wants to make a gourd he needs but a few days or weeks, but when he wants the giant oak of the forest he needs years and even centuries. It takes more time to educate the whole man than it does merely to train the hand to move accurately through space and to do its mechanical duty. But the whole man when educated is not dependent for life's enjoyment upon any outside world ; he has a world, he is a world of himself, and stands, of all creation, nearest in kind to his Maker. Dean Bagley, of the University of Illinois, has well said: Another insidious notion is that what we call general or liberal education is needed only by those who are going into the professions ; that workers in the industrial, agricultural, and commercial fields do not need the kind of culture that the general and liberal work of 30 TEACHING HIGH-SCHOOL LATIN the seventh and eighth grades and the high school is supposed to represent that instruction in history, in geography, in literature, is really vocational educational, preparing for the "white-collar" occupations. And so we have the proposals for differentiated courses in history, and we have proposals for even experiments in the teach- ing of English which would relegate the great masterpieces to the white-collar pupils, and feed those destined for other callings on the inspiring contents of poultry bulletins and mail-order catalogues Most of those who advocate early vocational differentiation are not thinking of their own children. Of course a broad and liberal training is presupposed for them. These opportunities for early vocational choices are for other people's children In the last analysis, the efficiency of our educational system de- pends upon the capacity of our boys and girls to do "hard, uncoaxed, uncomplimented work willingly and heartily." .... In our educational theory we have certainly gone too far, and educational practice has gone about as far as it is safe to venture without a counteracting movement. In my opinion, the time is ripe for a little tincture of iron in our educational philosophy; for a touch of a more virile idealism ; for a renaissance of thoroughness and a reasonable measure of rigor; for something approaching a revival of the ideals of duty and effort. 1 6) "The task and the returns are out of proportion": That depends on the point of view and the general attitude of the person interested. Latin does require good hard work, but that is one of its strongest points in a schedule of studies. A disposition to substitute easy, namby- pamby subjects for those which require hard, persistent effort is unfortunately gaining support, notwithstanding the fact that this kind of school work will certainly turn out a crude and namby-pamby product. Some pupils clamor for the easy, predigested material, but the majority 1 From an address delivered at the Detroit meeting of the Department of Superintendence of the National Education Association, 1916. CLASSICAL STUDIES ON THE DEFENSIVE 31 of those who complete the high-school course recognize the importance of hard work and are willing to apply themselves to it. For real education there is no hope short of hard and unremitting effort. The way to scholarship is rugged and steep. Any promise of culture that is not based upon hard work is a snare and a delusion. There is no education that is worth while which does not demand patient, determined, ceaseless endeavor, coupled with a persistent concentration of all the mental powers upon the task in hand. Few subjects so completely require this sustained effort as does Latin, and few give in return such generous rewards when the work is over. An evidence of this is seen in the long-continued service it has rendered to the cause of education in the centuries past, and in the strong and abiding faith of the world's great scholars in Latin as an effective agent in their own education. c) "One subject is as good as another, and Latin is no exception": It has been boldly argued that one subject is just as good as another; that no matter what one studies, it all amounts to the same, just so that he is studying. This is brother to the idea, equally sane and balanced, that no matter what one eats, it is all the same, just so that he is eating. Physical disaster in the one case is no more certain and sure than is mental disaster in the other. In addition to what we have said about unrestricted election, it is in place to say that there are sane and sensible means which are known to be capable of producing desirable ends in education. As the prospective dentist has little to hope for from a study of submarine navigation, and ought not to feel that this study could serve his purpose, so one 32 TEACHING HIGH-SCHOOL LATIN who is seeking for a well-developed mind, a well-rounded education ought not to hope that he can reach his end by the use of means which common-sense wholly rejects. What he needs is such subjects and in such combinations as will in a given time evenly develop the mental powers with which he is endowed; and he should strenuously avoid such subjects and such combinations as will, in the light of human reason, defeat his purpose. Common-sense and common utility demand that his main dependence should be upon subjects that have been tested, that have a litera- ture of permanent value, and that are available in a suffi- ciently organized and usable form for the purpose in hand. There are some subjects which never can have any genuine literature of their own, and consequently have no possi- bility of taking a permanent place in education. Some of these are valuable arts in themselves, and we cannot get along without them; but they offer nothing in the way of mental development, other than in the little of theory which lies back of them, and in the concentration necessary until reflex action has taken hold of the situation. Other- wise our cotton mills, sweatshops, and bakeries would be ranked as great universities and centers of human learning. Skill is one thing and entirely different from culture and real education. d) "I studied Latin and have forgotten all about it": Every now and then this man shows up. He studied Latin of course, but of course he forgot it. He is ready to give a good account of his other subjects, if we may follow out his suggestion. His mathematics, chemistry, history, physics all these and more he remembers ! Generally, the man who talks in this fashion suffered from a poor teacher or was himself a very indifferent student possibly both CLASSICAL STUDIES ON THE DEFENSIVE explanations apply. His very complaint is in fact a lament, as is well stated by Professor Shorey. 1 It has been said of the most polished writer in America that his matchless style is "the product of forgotten toil. 7 ' The man who would undertake to say that his Latin study did not do him a large service, simply because he cannot recall any of the lines of the texts he read, certainly has small claim on our consideration. He is simply hunting for an argument where there is none. The situation less disturbed of late. In another place it has been stated that less is now said against the classics than formerly, but the foregoing still represent the stock arguments which have been urged. There may be more complete answers than those offered, but even these seem fairly satisfactory. A reason for the comparative quiet may be the fact that the monopoly which Latin was accused of holding has been surrendered, or else broken up, so that in all the high schools pupils may take a substitute if they wish. Controversy not desirable. Latin teachers of high- school grade are generally timid about undertaking a defense of the classics when they are assailed, and this is natural, in view of the fact that they are not often in full possession of the facts. However, some of the data given in this book, such as the statistics, may serve a good purpose and silence agitators when debate would be useless. On the other hand, the high-school teachers naturally look to the professors in the colleges and universities to investigate the situation and to secure the facts which will enable them to answer the educational " experts" and others who now and then offer public objection to the 1 Latin and Greek in American Education, pp. 303 f . 34 TEACHING HIGH-SCHOOL LATIN classics. At least three of the great universities, through their classical faculties, have done most valuable work of this kind. It is hoped that others will become equally active, for they cannot afford to be silent while educational leadership is taken over by those who would carry out a program which is both revolutionary and destructive. CHAPTER IV THE TEACHER AND HIS SUBJECT Select your subject. The high schools of this country are commonly so organized that teachers are employed to teach one or two of the subjects offered in the course of study, rather than all the subjects of a grade or year. This arrangement encourages special preparation on the part of the teacher and should secure for the school a high grade of service. It is therefore of the largest importance that the prospective teacher decide as early as possible on the subject or subjects which appeal to him most strongly and which he thinks he can teach most effec- tively. Frequently those who look forward to teaching find it necessary to defer this decision until after they have taught for awhile and have had time to make up their minds definitely. In such cases, the delay cannot be avoided, but the pupils taught by a hesitating teacher and the subjects used in his experiments will necessarily suffer. Who should teach a foreign language ? In making his selection from the number of subjects taught in the high schools, several considerations must have due weight. A slow, hesitating young man, if he teaches at all, should not undertake foreign-language teaching, in which quick- ness of thought and expression are absolutely necessary. Also, one who has found foreign languages a difficult study and has made unsatisfactory progress in this kind of work should not feel called upon to teach a foreign language , Latin in particular, in later years. 35 36 TEACHING HIGH-SCHOOL LATIN Many young people are blessed with what teachers like to call "the language sense/' "a feeling for language/' which may mean that they naturally think quickly and connectedly and have a memory which retains readily and permanently. Young teachers who have this advantage, and with it a " genius for hard work/' have the natural quali- fications which make the successful teacher of Latin. Many who are only moderately endowed in these particulars achieve great things as teachers, by vigorous effort and close application a fact which offers encouragement to those who are willing to pay the price in persistent endeavor. The study of Latin and other foreign languages will prove helpful to those who are slow in language work, but if such students ever turn to teaching they should seek subjects which more readily adapt themselves to their own mental aptitude. They may have some strength in close and careful reasoning, in industrious pursuit of details, in manual dexterity, and these qualities may possibly be turned to good account in teaching one or more of the sciences. However, it is safe to say that a slow student should not be encouraged to think that the world needs his services in the capacity of a teacher. Hard work will achieve wonders, especially if there is a strong personality back of the effort. To achieve the best results, the teacher must be happy in his work. To be happy, he must have the subject which suits him best, which fits in best with his natural inclination and thus calls out the best that is in him. For one who likes Latin as a subject, and likes to teach it, likes to use it as an educational instrument, nothing else can quite take its place or so com- pletely occupy his "mind, soul, and strength." THE TEACHER AND HIS SUBJECT 37 Believe in your subject. No matter what his natural bent, or his training, the Latin teacher cannot do his best work unless he has a fixed faith in the efficiency of his sub- ject as a means to an end. One who tries to teach any subject in a half-hearted way is doing a positive wrong to those who are unfortunate enough to be forced to suffer at his hands. The young Latin teacher should make an investigation into the facts of the case and know what has been accomplished by Latin in the centuries past and what is now being done. In addition to this, he should watch the work of his own classes with a view to building up his faith in the effectiveness of Latin in his own hands. A Latin teacher who knows what he is expected to do with Latin, and knows that he can do that very thing, is bound to secure the best results possible. School officers careless. Occasionally conditions are met with in which the preferences and special fitness of the teachers do not determine assignments, as when school officers allow family connection and political alignments to influence, to some extent, their choice of teachers. In a group of teachers elected thus and turned over to the prin- cipal for assignments, there may be no one who is prepared to do good work in Latin. Teachers who depend upon local influence for appointments are not the kind who make preparation for teaching anything in particular, Latin least of all. The teacher who has Latin thus thrust upon him, despite his utter unpreparedness for teaching it, is likely to become rebellious, and his attitude will add greatly to the burdens of Latin. Parents and pupils naturally con- nect the subject and the teacher, every weakness of the teacher being placed to the account of the subject which he teaches. 38 TEACHING HIGH-SCHOOL LATIN Under such circumstances Latin is helpless. Some subjects are self-protecting and warn off intruders. Chem- istry, for instance, if tampered, with, may explode and blow embodied ignorance through the roof. Latin has no such protection, and its only hope is that when it is thus burdened some bright pupils will take hold of the situation and hold the class together. Otherwise the time of the class is wasted. This is an extreme condition and ought not to be possible anywhere, but those who know the weaker high schools know to what extent nepotism and politics have operated in keeping them weak. Teachers sometimes at fault. It happens all too frequently that teachers accept positions in the high schools for which they are not properly prepared. Latin has suffered in this particular. No one should undertake to teach the usual four years of Latin who has not done at least that amount of work under a competent teacher. No high school should employ for this work any teacher who has not had some college Latin, in addition to the four years in the high school. This reasonable minimum is not always adhered to. Other subjects suffer as well, possibly to an even greater extent than Latin does, and there should be some protection against mistakes of this kind. Latin teachers needed. Now and then schools which offer Latin cannot get well-trained teachers and are forced to make way for incompetent teachers, or else to leave out Latin for the time being. The latter course is decidedly preferable to using a teacher who does not know the subject and consequently cannot teach it. There is always a strong demand for high-school teachers who are able to teach Latin in such a way as to get results, and those who THE TEACHER AND HIS SUBJECT 39 are looking toward teaching as a life-work may safely prepare themselves for teaching this subject, provided they have the qualifications which have been mentioned as furnishing a basis for Latin teaching. The young teacher who takes Latin as his main subject should also prepare himself to teach one other subject that may readily be related to Latin, such as German, or French, or history or possibly English, according to his preferences. As stated above, many high schools require a teacher to take more than one branch of learning, and such a combination will prove a safe investment of money and of strength. Push the Latin, but be fair. Circumstances of late years have made it almost necessary for the young Latin teacher to push his work rather vigorously, in order to prevent unfair discrimination. This is not true of all high schools, but of those in some sections only. The Latin teacher must see that the work for which he is responsible does not suffer, but there is danger that in his efforts he may become rather intolerant toward other subjects, especially toward those whose supporters frequently declaim against Latin study. He must be on his guard against this narrowness, for he might prove little better than the faddist, of whom nothing but intolerance and narrow- ness need be expected. The Latin teacher must do high- grade work in his own department and see to it that his pupils get the best that is in him; but he must be fair to all other subjects and to the teachers of these, and must show just appreciation of the work done in all the other departments. Latin cannot do the whole work of educa- tion; it must stand shoulder to shoulder with every other subject which can be used in the task of educating young men and young women. CHAPTER V THE TRAINING OF THE LATIN TEACHER Prepare to teach the subject you have selected. After the young teacher has selected his subject, it becomes his duty to prepare himself as thoroughly as he can for the work he is to do. He is especially fortunate if he can make his decision early in his college course. Latin teachers must know Latin. In some subjects a teacher may be able to keep up appearances without knowing very much about his work, but Latin is not one of these. The teacher either knows Latin or does not, and the weakest pupil in his class will not be long in finding out the truth. A knowledge of the language and literature is an absolute necessity, and there is no way of dodging this demand. Efforts at teaching Latin without a sufficient knowledge invariably bring confusion and disaster, as many a teacher can testify. While yet in college, the young teacher should take every course in Latin that he can, and should get as much Greek as he can find time for, as Greek is an essential factor in good Latin teaching. Latin teachers must know how to teach Latin. In addition to an accurate knowledge of the subject-matter, it is important to be able to teach it in an effective manner. Very few are "born teachers"; most of those who imagine that they are have little evidence to back their claims. The great majority may do fairly well at first, if they know the subject, but their teaching is largely experimental, until, after much experience, they find the best ways and means of teaching. There is no good reason, however, 40 TRAINING OF THE LATIN TEACHER 41 why the right training beforehand should not shorten the period of experimenting and fit them for satisfactory work from the start. Professor Bennett's caution. The following caution against emphasizing " method" is offered by Professor Bennett: I have elsewhere called attention to what seems to me a dangerous inference, likely to be drawn, and certainly not infrequently drawn, in connection with modern pedagogy; and I may perhaps not be departing too far from my theme if I say again that teaching is not the application of a method, but that, as Quintilian reminds us, it is a constant adaptation to the problem momentarily in hand. It is the very reverse of anything and everything mechanical. It there- fore does not submit to the definite formulation of a method capable of general application. The two essentials of the teacher are a knowl- edge of his subject and skill in momentary adaptation. Accordingly, when I note the prodigious emphasis placed on "method" in prepara- tion for the profession of teaching, I feel warranted in saying that such emphasis is of doubtful wisdom, since it involves the assumption that knowledge is of less account than method, that method either necessarily carries with it capacity for the skilful adaptation requisite in teaching, or is even superior to it. 1 This caution of Professor Bennett against over stress- ing " method" is very timely. There is a disposition, particularly strong in teacher-training institutions, to make " method" the center of interest, the natural con- sequence being a subordination of real scholarship. Where " method" becomes a substitute for scholarship, or for a knowledge of the subject to be taught, it is a dangerous and reprehensible thing. In this connection, we are advocating an entirely different kind of method. The prospective teacher who knows his subject should have some training in the art of presenting it, so that from the very beginning 1 Classical Journal, IV, 162. 42 TEACHING HIGH-SCHOOL LATIN of his work with his classes he may be able to do reasonable justice to his pupils and to his subject. He may acquire this skill as a result of practicing upon his classes until he has his resources well in hand. A much better way would be for him to make a study of the problems connected with teaching Latin in this case, under the direction of one who is both a successful teacher and an accomplished scholar. The young teacher who has "a knowledge of the subject'' and " skill in momentary adaptation/' along with others not half so fortunate, will profit greatly by such training. There is no -reason for fearing that this plan will prove anything but helpful. If the young teacher is naturally conservative, he will at least have good models to. follow instead of the poor ones of his own high-school years; if he is naturally progressive, what he learns will not hamper him nor prevent his improving on what his instructor has taught him. Better teaching a necessity. The stronger private schools and the high schools of the larger cities are fortunate in being able generally to secure good teachers for all their subjects. The problem is to find strong, well-equipped teachers for Latin in the weaker high schools, many of which pay reasonable salaries but of course salaries not equal to those paid in the cities. These schools, however, have more than half the pupils who are studying high-school branches, and other subjects besides Latin are poorly taught. It is probable that Latin is as well taught as any thing else in the majority of these institutions; but when Latin is poorly taught, or is in the hands of an incom- petent teacher, its burden is increased, and faults appear which in fact do not belong to Latin, as has been said elsewhere. TRAINING OF THE LATIN TEACHER 43 It is an evidence of the " final perseverance" of Latin, if we may so call it, that, notwithstanding the poor results too often secured in such schools, and the general suscep- tibility of the average school board to the demand for the practical, fathers and mothers still believe in Latin and insist that their sons and daughters shall have an opportu- nity to study it during their high-school course. This faith should be honored by an earnest effort on the part of colleges and universities to prepare a sufficient supply of teachers to meet the demand. It certainly behooves those who are high-priests in the classical temple to stir their young novices to a fuller preparation, and themselves to furnish the best possible models for the hundreds who in devoted allegiance crowd about their altars. Some of the best Latin teaching done in this country is done in the larger colleges and universities and also some of the poorest. That Latin has survived the deadening effect of poor teach- ing in such surroundings is abundant evidence of its "final perseverance." We must have trained teachers. Our colleges and universities can readily do a large service by pushing vigorously this preparation of teachers for the high schools. There are no reasons for the training of a teacher for any kind of work that do not apply quite as well to those who are to do the work in Latin. The cause of Latin, as has been indicated elsewhere, is to a large extent bound up with the question of better Latin teaching. If we can get good teachers, or, rather, a larger supply of the kind who make Latin interesting and profitable, we shall cease to hear anything said about leaving Latin out of our schools. Suggestions for a course for teachers. Several col- leges and universities are now offering courses designed to 44 TEACHING HIGH-SCHOOL LATIN give Latin teachers some training such as has been indi- cated. These courses naturally vary, some of them being of more practical value than others. Without trying to mark out a complete program, emphasis may be placed upon the following features: 1. The place and value of Latin in an educational sys- tem. A teacher cannot succeed with a subject of the value of which he is uninformed. Latin can do its part in educa- tion and nothing more. The evidence of experience, as given in Professor Kelsey's Latin and Greek in American Education, is very essential. Other volumes of a somewhat similar character will contribute largely, such as Ashmore's The Classics and Modern Training, Babbitt's Literature and the American College, and Harrington's Live Issues in Classical Study. 2. The exact work which the teacher is to undertake. The teacher of Latin has a narrower task which may be laid out within very exact lines, that is, teaching the subject so that his pupils will thoroughly understand the language and the literature in so far as the high-school course extends. There is also a larger service which Latin can accomplish in the making of men and women. In the hands of a skil- ful teacher no other subject can be made to contribute so largely to the real education of young people. This larger field of service which Latin has always held should be well understood by the young teacher, in order that he may measure up to his opportunities. 3. Familiarity with the high-school authors. The class should re-read rapidly the three authors commonly studied in the high schools, or equivalents for these. In this work the instructor should show by actual demonstration the best methods of presenting the subject. The various books TRAINING OF THE LATIN TEACHER 45 which bear on each author should be examined carefully, and there should be a fair degree of familiarity with the bibliography of the authors read. 4. Training in the collection and use of collateral material. When the teacher has listened to the reading of a chapter from Caesar and criticized the reader, only a small part of the hour's work has been done. That is not Latin teaching. Even after the translation is over, after all forms have been reviewed and the constructions reported on, the work is not over. The teacher who knows what collateral material is available for awakening the interest of his class, and then collects that material for actual use, will never fail to get good results in his drills on forms and constructions, or in other hard work. A careless teacher objects to this as unnecessary, but herein lies the real teacher's oppor- tunity to make his teaching touch ordinary life. Pupils may forget the sentences read, but they will not forget the story of old Appius Claudius, or the picture of the Pantheon, or the little song sung in Latin. These things are worth while. This part of the course should include a working familiarity with Sandys' Companion to Latin Studies, which is the best of the volumes of this kind available. 5. Practice teaching during the year. -Not much can be said in favor of this from the viewpoint of those prac- ticed on, but if the college is so organized that prospective teachers of Latin can teach under competent supervision for awhile, this practice will prove very helpful. Probably the pupils who are thus taught will be so protected by the critic teacher in charge that they will not be injured more than they would be at the hands of the ordinary untrained teacher. 46 TEACHING HIGH-SCHOOL LATIN These are merely suggestions as to some things which may be made the basis of investigation during the course and have the advantage of a successful test. Self-trained teachers. A large majority of our Latin teachers decided upon Latin teaching after they finished their college course, or else did their work in a college which offered no opportunity to take a course preparatory to Latin teaching. Such teachers can do much to supplement their own efforts and experience by summer courses in the universities, and by closely studying the various books and bulletins available on the subject of better Latin teaching. A list of some of the best books of this character is given elsewhere. CHAPTER VI ENGLISH IN LATIN STUDY English largely Latin. The English language has drawn so largely upon Latin as a source of words and of ideas that no sane person can fail to see the large possibilities in the study of Latin for those who speak English. In fact, this is generally accepted as one of the strongest reasons for retaining Latin in our schools. English teachers have found that pupils who have had Latin are not only more satisfactory pupils than those who have not had it, but that year in and year out they make decidedly higher grades in English. 1 A fairly comprehensive statement of this dependence of English upon Latin may be given as follows : English derived from Latin. i. The vocabulary. It is estimated that half of the words in our largest dictionaries are of Latin origin. Even our ordinary words are largely from the Latin, as is estab- lished by the following quotations from the Literary Digest of January 25, 1913 (" Lexicographer's Column")- An examination of the origin of nearly 20,000 words in common use in different parts of the English-speaking world gives the following results: Anglo-Saxon and English 3;68i Low German 126 Dutch 207 Scandinavian 693 German 333 1 See Classical Journal, X, 94 f. 47 48 TEACHING HIGH-SCHOOL LATIN French from Low German 54 " Dutch or Middle Dutch 45 " Scandinavian 63 (i) German 85 " (2) Middle High German 27 (3) Old High German 154 " (4) Teutonic 225 (Romance languages) 297 from Latin 4,842 " Late Latin 828 " Italian 162 Celtic 170 Latin (direct) 2,880 Provencal from Latin 25 Italian 99 Spanish 108 Portuguese 21 Greek, direct or through Latin, Late Latin, French, or other sources 2,493 Slavonic 31 Lithuanian i Asiatic, Aryan languages 163 European, non-Aryan languages 20 SemitiJHebrew gg [Arabic 272 Asiatic, non- Aryan languages 136 African languages 32 American 102 Hybrid 675 Unknown. . 12 19,160 These are words of common use. The more technical and " high-sounding" words are mainly of classical origin. 2. The grammar. Practically all of our grammar has been borrowed from the Latin. It therefore seems neces- sary to understand the Latin sentence in order to appre- ciate our own sentence structure. The teacher of English who does not know Latin is seriously handicapped, but unfortunately he may not know wherein he fails to measure up to his position. ENGLISH IN LATIN STUDY 49 3. The literature. Classical literature has largely furnished the models on which our own literature has been built. Not only the general plans have come into our own use, but we have taken very largely from the ideas of classi- cal writers and shaped them to our needs. Roman and Greek characters are constant material for simile and meta- phor and other comparison, and we read our own history largely in terms of Greece and Rome. This classical current, welcome and refreshing, runs through all of our literature that is of value; but in no particular is it more easily traced than in the very large use of mythological references by our standard authors. Mythology in English literature. A careful investiga- tion into the mythological element in a number of the English poets has been made under the direction of Pro- fessor F. J. Miller, and a numerical count of these references has given the following results: Spenser, 650; Byron, 450; Shelley, 325; Robert Browning, 250; Tennyson, 225; Pope, 175; Mrs. Browning, 175; Matthew Arnold, 100; J. G. Saxe, 100. More critical studies of these references have been made for a few of these writers: e.g., Randall, Sources of Spenser's Classical Mythology; Osgood, Classical Mythology in Milton; Root, Classical Mythology in Shakespeare; and Mustard, Classical Echoes in Tennyson. The last volume goes beyond the mythological element, as the title indicates. Gayley's Classic Myths in English Literature gives a general view of this element in our literature. Mythology at first hand. It may be objected that a knowledge of mythology can be had without a study of the classics. This is partly true, but it is proper to reply that unfortunately very few who do not study the classics 50 TEACHING HIGH-SCHOOL LATIN give the time and effort necessary for obtaining a knowledge of mythology. Even when time and effort are expended, the results obtained from such a study of mythology out of its natural setting are rudimentary and of comparatively little service. Dictionaries, encyclopedias, and handbooks of mythology are of easy access, but generally they are not used by those who are reading an English author for the pleasure of the reading. Suppose, however, that such a reader should find a reference to some character in mythol- ogy and should open his encyclopedia. Take a reference to Juno, for instance. He would see her described as "one of the goddesses of the Romans, identical with Hera of the Greeks, wife and sister of Jupiter," with possibly something more in the same strain. The reader returns to his book and takes up the thread of his narrative with this vague idea of Juno in mind. But one who has followed Juno through the Iliad of Homer and the Aeneid of Vergil has another kind of idea of what Juno represents, and he reads with this knowledge and gets vastly more out of his reading than the one who knows nothing more than what he gets from his book of reference. The student of the classics is able to enter into the full thought of the writer, and he thus really enjoys the larger world which the other reader never enters. What has been said of mythological references in particular holds of classical references in general throughout English literature. No writer who knows the history, life, and literature of the ancients can fail to make use, now and then at least, of the rich illustrative materials so abundantly at hand. The value of such a knowledge of classical matters is readily seen by reverting to the two readers referred to ENGLISH IN LATIN STUDY 51 above. Both read of a " Trojan horse," "some wily Sinon," a real "Sabine farm/' or something of the kind, and from the reference book one gets an unsatisfactory explanation if indeed his search for information is rewarded for he may not know where to look; while the other, without interruption, finds real delight in the familiar visions which are thus brought before him. CHAPTER VII PUBLIC TESTIMONY TO THE VALUE OF LATIN STUDY The following statistics taken from the reports of the United States Commissioner of Education furnish con- clusive evidence that Latin is doing a large service in our high schools and academies: Subject Pupils 1889-90 Pupils 1899-1900 Pupils 1909-10 Pupils 1914-15 Latin 100 152 314. 8^6 4.0^ ^O2 CJQ3 o8< Greek 12 869 24 869 IO.73O 10 671 French 2Q.O4.3 65,684 95,671 136,131 German Algebra 34,208 127,307 94,875 34.7,013 192,933 4.6^,37^ 312,258 436,016 Geometry =;8 781 168 518 2 tr 2 .4.04. 34.6 064. Physics 63 ,64.4. 118,036 120,910 184,426 Chemistry. 28 665 t\O 4.31