UiillHIiltllHilllllllllHHIHIIIHtitili i THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES /^^^^^ c ^. NATURE A PARABLE. LONDON : GII.nF.UT AND RIVINGTON, PRINTERS, ST. John's square. r -^^ NATURE A PARABLE : A POEM, IN SEVEN BOOKS. BY THE REV. JOHN BRANDE MORRIS, M.A. FELLOW OF EXETER COLLEGE, OXFORD. Like is nature unto Scripture, Like too are things witliin to things without. S. Ephrem. adv. Scrut. xxxv. LONDON: PRINTED FOR J. G. F. & J. RIVINGTON, ST. Paul's church yard, AND WATERLOO PLACE, PALL MALL. 1842. TK PREFACE. The present work was originally undertaken as a relief fi-om engagements of a more laborious kind. It struck me that in all writers not of the very driest class, there are some things of an imaginative hue, and that I might therefore not disadvantageously employ my leisure hours in correcting and chastening whatever amount of imaginative tendencies I had myself, by noticing things of the kind in the works of the Fathers. I went to them in this as in other respects with a desire to consult them as oracles, not to judge of them as authors. As for a blind reverence for them, I cannot believe that such a thing exists, or was ever even talked of except by such as were either ignorant of their writings, or, with some knowledge of these, made no effort to follow H5>rA2A VI PREFACE. their stern holiness and patient gentleness. The gracious- ness of our Lord's promise reaches even to the effort to do His Father's Will '. I hope that vvhatever defects of style, or judg- ment, or doctrine, there may be in this work, I have throughout it expressed a conviction that stern living is the way to understand the subjects of which it makes a feeble attempt to treat. If in expressing that conviction I have any where seemed deficient in gentleness, I have little doubt myself that it is to be attributed to my own want of sternness to myself. Still any one may make an effort to attain the two, though he succeed but ill in attaining them. Of the seeming childishness, then, of some of the interpretations of Scripture, or other things contained in this book, (if they are taken from the Fathers,) tve have no right to form opinions until we live the strict lives of the Fathers. And as there are people about England who one trusts are moving in that direction, I humbly hope that the book may not be unacceptable to such persons. It is addressed to them, and not to other people : and the possession of leisure for studying ' St. John vii. I7, 'Eav tiq Oi\)j rb 9i\i]fui Avrov tvoiuv, &c. PREFACE. Vll the Fathers, or the liability to do it as a duty, seems in some measure a call upon one to venture, in spite of one's own great deficiencies, the attempt so to direct one's studies as to supply the wants of people of that descrip- tion. I have endeavoured, therefore, throughout the notes, to put together such passages as I thought would be acceptable to them : with them I have wished to sympathize, even when they are less hopeful about our prospects, than, at present, whether rightly or wrongly, I feel myself. But I have said enough of the general object of the book : I will only add to this, that it will bear marks in the structure of it of having been written at different ecclesiastical seasons, as having been my relief on Sundays and Saints Days from more laborious occupations. I may also do well to say, that as I had an ulterior purpose in attending to typology, that pur- pose has been the reason why I have not consulted modern works upon the subject, but almost exclusively ancient ones. This premised, it may perhaps be not undesirable to say somewhat as to the subject-matter of the book, what it attempts to do, and upon what suppositions it is founded and regulated. vill PRKFACE. The whole subject, then, of the typical meaning of Nature, is but a continuation, or rather an instance and illustration, of the subject of Bp. Butler's Analogy. For assuming that the Church system and the system of Nature proceed from the same Author, there arises, upon the principles of that great divine, an immediate pro- l)ability that there will be a similarity in the two. Thus the cleansing, and refreshing, and invigorating powers of water, are analogous to correlative powers of Baptism. For the other Sacrament we need no further statement of the analogy than that which we are familiar with in the Catechism. And the thing assumed in this book is, that such analogies are not accidental, but designed ; and that the Church system will clear up the meaning of Nature in the same way that Christianity clears up the meaning of Prophecy. " Facilius Prophetise credas dis- cipulus natura;," said Tertullian. But as a rude and imperfect Christianity will not fully explain many of the minutia; of Prophecy, so neither will an imperfect Church clear up the minuter meaning of nature. Whether all branches of the Church have or have not their imperfections, it would not be my business to discuss : but that our own has its imperfections, is what PREFACE. IX Bp. Andrewes allowed, and what aU acquainted with the ancient Catholic system must feel, and some, very distressingly. Hence I have been sometimes led to reo-ret the loss of those rites and ceremonies which served as antitypes to the types of nature. And some people will, I am afraid, think this undutiful : it may to these last be some palliation of what perhaps they judge too hastily of, to know that I have endea- voured in all cases to discourage seeking for a re- covery of them, except by improving our own hearts by discipline, and so looking for a blessing upon our prayers. Still it seems desirable to make people long for things, that they may so seek them. It is well also to show others, if so be we may, that there are those who sympathize with them, and feel those losses which, perhaps, sometimes lead them to mis- trust their present position. And let me venture again to suggest, what has been suggested by others, to such as complain of their feelings being shocked at start- ling positions and statements, that others are often shocked by them in another way, and yet try to bear in silence their brother's burdens — a duty which all ought to aim at performing, however hard it may be X PREFACE. sometimes to perceive the occasions where there is call for it. Such, then, are the objects of this volume, and such seem to be the author's liabilities to be mistaken or objected to, in trying to execute them. It niav be further objected, that the great divine above referred to would by no means sanction the ex- tension of the principle of analogy to the degree here assumed allowable; that, on the contrary, he discourages the use of imagination in religion, and calls it ' the author of all error.' Let me then proceed to consider this objection, with a view to show what has been my idea of the way in which that ' forward and delusive faculty ' was to be regulated in treating of matters of so serious a kind. Of course there are some things which come from one's own imagination in a work like the present ; and it would be idle to pretend that one's own mind gave no colouring to what it took from other sources. The very notion of carrying out suggestions and filling up outhnes would imply as much; and this has been done in several cases, only with a wish that they might be agreeable to the analogy of the faith. And the vei-y PREFACE. XI reference to such a rule will imply that there are some things which imagination may not deal with, as well as some with which it may. Now if we avail ourselves of an ancient division of all theological suhjects into two classes, one comprising those which answer to the sub- jects of the aofpia of Aristotle, such as truths relating to eternal and immutable things, the doctrine of the Trinity or the like; the other, that which comprises subjects answering to those of (j)p6i'r]