Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2007 with funding from IVIicrosoft Corporation http://www.archive.org/details/extractsfromrepoOOpattrich BANCROFT LIBRARY SUTRO. JUNE 19:. 9 BANCROFT UBRARV EXTRACTS FROM THE Report of ttie U. S. Picfc Railwaj Commission J 1888. By ROBT. E. PATTISON. 54 BANCROFT LIBRARY SUTRO. JUNE 1939 EXTRACTS FKOM THE Report of the U. S. Pacific Railway Commission, 1888. By ROBT. K. RATTISON. Governor of Pennsylvania. The construction companies or inside combina- tions that built five of the six roads have destroyed or concealed their books; the exception being the Central Branch ; and the Commission has been em- barrassed in its work by the refusal or failure of the companies to produce the accounts relating to the actual cost of construction, or to exhibit any paper or documents that would enable the Com- mission to ascertain the truth as to this most im- portant factor in the investigation. The books of the Credit Mobilier, which built the Union Pacific from Omaha to Ogden; the books of tlie Contract and Finance Company, which built the Western Pacific from San Jose to Sacramento, and the Cen- tral Pacific from Sacramento to Ogden; the books of Shoemaker & Co., who built the Kansas Pacific ; and the accounts of John I. Blair, who built the Sioux City and Pacific Railroad — all these are missing. From the minutes and accounts of the railroad companies, and from fragmentary infor- mation gathered from various sources, it is dis- closed that the officers of at least three of these companies made false statements under oath, in affidavits now on file in the Interior Department. From these affidavits the following has been com- piled : STOCK TABLE. Company. Stock act- ually paid iu. Stock paid in as sworn to. Names of deponents Date of affi- davit. Union Pacific $400,650 250,000 760,000 386,700 136,702,300 5,072,500 54,283,190 C80,600 Oliver Ames Sept. 27, 1870. Sept. 28, lb72. Sept. 18, 1871. Sept. 21, 18G9. Kansas Pacific... Central Pacific... Central Branch. .. R. K.Carr Leland Stanford K. M. Pomeroy Total ?1,797, 350 $97,098,590 It is no answer to the Government that the managers of these companies did only that which the managers of raih^oads in other sections did. These lines were built upon public credit. They were public highways in the broadest sense of that term. The managers were acting as trustees of a national highway, and they can not plead any law- ful justification for making false affidavits, which state that $97,098,690 of stock was actually paid for, when in fact less than two millions had been so paid for. THEIR RELATIONS TO THE PUBLIC. The original purpose of Congress, as set forth in the act of July 1, 1862, in granting subsidies for the construction of the Pacific roads, was to pro- mote the public interest, and the companies were made trustees for that purpose; but the public in- terest has been subordinated by these companies to the stockholding interest, upon the claim that the stockholders owned the railroads and could manage their own business in their own way. Nearly every obligation which these corporations assumed under the laws of the United States, or as common carriers, has been violated. Their management has been a national disgrace. Since the date of their inception they have been conduc- ted upon a purely speculative basis. Their per- manent prosperity has been lost sight of, while their managers greedily strove for temporary ad- vantage. For fourteen years the Union Pacific and the Central Pacific were practically free from com- petition for a stretch of 1,800 miles across the BANCROFT LIBRARY SUTRO. JUt'C ' 747 1-^- continent. They were independent of many of those disturbing elements which have been pleaded in extenuation of the vicious practices of railroads in other parts of the country, and yet they injec- ted secrecy into their affairs, inaugurated favoritism and corruption in their management, and at- tempted to destroy competition. They organized pools for the professed purpose of securing cer- tainty, uniformity and permanency in freight rates, but they did not respect the pools which they entered into when immediate advantages could be obtained by a breach of good faith. Mr. Huntington testified before the Commission that '' competition is killing," and that there ought to be only one railroad for the whole country. The aided companies combined with others to tax the communities which they served, and they forced the consuming classes in all sections of the country to contribute to the payment of interest and dividend upon the fictitious capital which they had created. They increased the cost of living. They laid proprietary claim to the traffic of large sections of the country. They squandered millions of their money to ^'protect" their terri- torial claims, while expending other millions in encroachments upon the territory claimed by other companies. They constituted themselves the arbiters of trade. They attempted to dictate the channels that trade should follow and fixed rates of transportation that were extortionate. They charged all that the traffic would bear, and appropriated a share of the profits of every in- dustry by charging the greater part of the differ- ence between the actual cost of production and the price of the article in the market. They dis- criminated between individuals, between localities, and between articles. They favored particular individuals and companies. They destroyed pos- sible competitors, and they built up particular localities to the injury of other localities, until matters had reached such a pass, that no man dared engage in any business in which transporta- tion largely entered without first soliciting and obtaining the permission of a railroad manager. They departed from their legitimate sphere as common carriers and engaged in mining articles for transportation over their own lines. They ex- erted a terrorism over merchants and over com- munities, thus interfering with the lawful pursuits of the people. They participated in election contests. By secret cuts and violent and rapid fluctuations in rates they menaced business, para- lyzed capital, and retarded investment and devel- opment. THEIR RELATIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT. During the five ^^ears from 1864 to 1869, upon the claim that their roads were fully completed, these companies obtained bonds from the Govern- ment; but when the Government called upon them to pay a percentage of their net earnings into the Treasury, as was stipulated in the original contract, they contended that their roads were not fully completed until 1874, and refused to make any payments to the Government, though one of them, the Central Pacific, had been declaring divi- dends in the mean time. They resisted the claims and demands of the Government at every point, and resorted to every device their ingenuity could invent in their efforts to evade the plain requirements of the law. In transporting troops and supplies for the Government, they violated the contract obligation to charge reasonable rates by charging more than they charged to private shippers for the same kind of service. The reports of the Union Pacific show that the average rates paid by the Government to that corporation were higher than those received by that company from other sources. The same is more or less true of the BANCROFT LIBP^nv other bond-aided companies. The overcharges upon the Government by the Central and Union Pacific Companies since 1880, are estimated to have been as follows: Union Pacific $802,407.33 Central Pacific 167,558.63 PROFITS OF $278,023, e357.63 in operating the roads. The reports of these companies show the follow- ing figures relating to operation, disclosing a profit or'net earnings of $278,023,357.63, equaling fi'fteen million dollars a year. EAENINGS TABLE. Koad. Gross earn- ings. Operating expenses. Net earnings Union ond Kansas Pacific. .. . ?315,S03 504.66 274,139.116.27 9,187,359.50 12,849,463.47 $169,916,078.90 149,199,102.40 6,423,596.82 7,917.o08.15 $145,387,425.76 121,940,013.87 2,763,762.68 4,932,155.02 Central Pacific Railroad, from 1863 to December 31, 1886 Sioux City and Pacific Railroad, from July 80, 1869, to Juno 30, 1887 Central Branch Union Pacific Total $611,470,443.90 $333,456,080.27 $278,023,357.63 OVER $25,000,000 FOR POOLS, rebates, and over- charges. In addition to the gross earnings given as above, the bond-aided companies received the following sums, w^hich they subsequently paid out on account of pools, subsidies, rebates, overcharges, etc. : POOLS, REBATES AND OVERCHARGES. Road. Pools. Rebates and overcharges. Total. Union Pacific ) $4,004,512.48 $11,577,091.62 Kansas Pacific . ...\ $15,581,604.10 Sioux City and Pacific 401,832 01 Central Pacific. ... 9,882,799.61 Total $25,866,235.72 LOSSES SUSTAINED BY THE GOVERNMENT. The Central Pacific and Union Pacific, between them, have paid over $4,000,000 to the Pacific Mail Steamship Company to maintain high rates. To branch lines the Union Pacific, since 1881, has also given various amounts estimated at $2,400,000, and the Central Pacific $520,762.97, on account of constructive mileage. All of the sums paid out for pools, rebates, overcharges, etc., amounting to $25,866,235.72, were deducted by the companies from the gross earnings actually received by them before stating the amount which was reported to the Government as their gross earnings. In other words, they refused to consider and designate this sum of $25,866,235.72 as part cf their gross earnings because they subsequently paid it out for pools and rebates. In this respect, as well as in respect to charges for general expenses that should have been charged against auxiliary companies, the reports, as made by the Union Pacific Com- pany to the Government, were erroneous. For the same reasons and also because the Central Pacific Company was charged for and paid expenses in- curred by and for the Southern Pacific Company (the case of Senator Norwood being a conspicuous illustration), the reports made by the Central Pacific Company to the Government were errone- ous. The losses sustained by the United States on account of erroneous reports and overcharges amounts to over $8,000,000. PAYiMENTS FOR IMPROPER PURPOSES. Large sums were also applied to improper jmr- poses. In the accounts of the Sioux City and Pacific Railroad Company this item amounted to $263,81-2.08 for losses incurred in operating the Fremont, Elkhorn and Missouri Yalley Railroad, in which the directors of the Sioux City and Pacific Railroad were interested. In the accounts of the Central Pacific Railroad Company, this diversion of earnings amounted to many millions through contracts made by Messrs. Stanford, Huntington, Hopkins, and Crocker, with themselves, for construction, leases, repairs, etc. They constructed 1,171 miles of adjunct lines, at •^CROFT LIBRARY SUIRO. JUNE I93P a cost of $2T,216,931.01. On account of that construction in addition to a small cash payment they issued bonds to themselves to the amount of $33,722,000, and stock to the amount of $49,005,800, making a total issue of $82,727,800, of which $55,539,554 represented inflation. Then, as directors of the Central Pacific, they took leases of their own lines for the Central Pacific for $3,490,828.81 per annum; which was at the rate of nearly 1 3 per cent. Fifteen months ago three of these directors con- tracted with themselves to build an extension of the California and Oregon division of the Central Pacific from Delta to the boundary line of Oregon, a distance of 103 miles. In payment they issued stock to the amount of $8,000,000 and bonds to the amount of $4,500,000, the market value of the stocks and bonds at that time being $8,340,000. The actual cost of construction was $3,505,609, so that they personally profited by their own votes by that single transaction to the extent of $4,834- 391. Mark Hopkins is dead, but his interest is still maintained for his estate and heirs. In following up the dealings of these directors with the Central Pacific Railroad Company and its adjunct companies, it is found that Messrs. Stanford, Huntington, Hopkins, and Crocker re- ceived over $142,000,000 in cash and securities through the Contract and Finance Company, the Western Development Company, the Pacific Im- provement Company, and dividends of the Central Pacific Railroad Company. In addition to this sum of $142,000,000, they also made large profits in the operations of fifteen or more other com- panies, which were directly or remotely sapping the revenues of the Central Pacific Company. The total payments by the Central Pacific on account of rentals amounted to $29,912,373.49. ACCOUNTS AND VOUCHERS OF THE AIDED COMPANIES. The same company also expended $-1,818,355.07/ of which the managers decline to give any expla- nation or to permit others to explain. As the re- sources of the company have been diminished to the extent of these expenditures, and as the road itself will not yield sufficient to satisfy the Government claim, it is apparent that the United States are eventually the losers by those disbursements, most of which, as shown by the Huntington letters, were applied to corrupt public men and influence legislation. In the accounts of the Union Pacific, it was found that $38,000,000 of the funds of that company had been expended for the construction of branch lines, that many millions additional were squandered in purchases of bankrupt branch lines at excessive prices, and that the earnings of the express and telegraph service of that company, as well as of the other bond-aided companies, were, in violation of law, placed under the control of express and telegraph companies in which some of the mana- gers of the Union and Central Pacific Companies were largely interested and of which they were the main beneficiaries. The balance sheet of the Central Pacific for 18 86 should have shown a deficit of over $14,000,000 in the profit and loss account, but by omitting from the debit side the accumulated interest which the Government had advanced* amounting to $31,869,475.20, and by marking up its lands in its asset column to $23,500,000, when the actual value was $12,500,000, as appears from the testi- mony of the company's land agent, the company made a showing of an apparent surplus of over $28,000,000. The early accounts of the Union Pacific disclose, among other interesting items, the following: BANCROFT LIBRARY SUTRO. JUNE 1939 9 September 12, 1871. First-mortgage bonds for $247,000, which should be on hand, but which are not $247,000 United States 110 6 per cent, currency bonds, which should be on hand, but are not 110,000 $347,000 The book accounts of the Union Pacific prior to 1880, are frequently unsupported by vouchers, and for some years there are practically no vouchers to establish the correctness of the books. Since 1880, there were expenditures, in connec- tion with legislation in Western States, which were not properly vouched for. The Central Pacific Company also loaned its funds to its officers to enable them to construct the South- ern Pacific, a competing line, across the continent. The accountants of the commission report that no vouchers exist to show disbursements by the Central Branch of the Union Pacific, and that all the vouchers of the Sioux City and Pacific, from 1864 to 1880, are missing, with the exception of a few cash vouchers. LEGAL EXPENSES. Large sums were also squandered by some of the bond-aided companies to pay for the services of lawyers to influence legislation, the total legal expenses of the companies being as follows: Union Pacific and Kansas Pacific $2,349,554 00 Central Branch 333,661 65 Sioux City and Pacific 37,287 75 Central Pacific 2,361, 154 88 Total $5,081,659 08 A large sum which had been expended by the Central Pacific for legislation was posted under the head of ''general expenses." The addition of that sum would materially increase the total pay- ments on account of legal expenses. 10 LAND PATENTS AND TAX PAYMENTS. The refusals of the Central Pacific to pay its taxes to the State of California have been so per- sistent and so flagrant, and extended over so long a period of years, that the Governor of California, on March 24, 1884, issued a proclamation setting forth the fact that for four years the railroads of the State (the Central Pacific) had refused to obey the laws imposing taxes upon their property and calUng a special session of the legislature to devise methods for enforcing a compliance with the laws of the State. The Central Pacific had resis- ted State taxation on the ground (see p. 102, Re- port of Railroad Commissioners of California for 1883), that it had been constructed under act of Congress of July 1, 1862. When the Commis- sioners examined Mr. Leland Stanford, in San Francisco, he insisted that the Central Pacific Com- pany was a State, and not a Federal corporation. The Central Pacific has selected only one-half of its land grant in California that has been surveyed, and it has failed to select 180,000 acres in that State that have been surveyed since the completion of the road. Of the grant to the Central Pacific in Nevada, 700,000 acres were surveyed at the date of the completion of the road, and about 2,000,000 acres are now surveyed. The company has selected about one-fourth of its land grant in that State. Of the grant to the Central Pacific in Utah, of which 250,000 acres were surveyed at the date of the completion of the road in 1809, no lands were selected until February, 1884, nearly fifteen years after the completion of the road. Because of the vicious methods actually pursued by the bond-aided companies the Government has been defrauded of the bulk of its advances, ship- pers have been taxed to the extent of over $248,- 000,000, and liabilities to the amount of $389,517,- BANCROFT LIBRARY SUTRO. JUNE IP3C n 265 have been heaped upon the properties; the total Habilities of these companies to the pubUc and Government on Dec 31, 1886, being as follows: Union Pacific, including St. Joseph and Grand Island guarantee $203,379,555 00 Central Pacific 171,908,784 GO Sioux City and Pacific 7,392,447 17 Central Brancli 6,836,470 16 $389,517,205 33 These companies have paid out the following sums in interest and dividend : INTEREST AND DIVIDENDS. COMPANY. INTEREST. DIVIDEND. Union Pacfiic \ Kansas Pacific J Central Branch Sioux City and Pacific. Central Pacific 882,742,850 28 1,882,826 10 1,700,618 67 53,877,031 15 $28,650,770 150,000 180,280 31,308,055 $140,212,332 20 $63,298,105 It is not, therefore, a matter of surprise that they are unable to pay the Government debt and that their resources have been diminished to such an extent as to give the Government very little return for its loans. The officials of the Central Pacific said that the aided portion of that line was not worth more than the first mortgage of $27,855,680, which is prior to the Government lien, thus leaving the Government without any return for its advances. The majority of the Commission recommended an extension of the time for payment of the debts of all the companies for fifty years on certain terms. The testimony shows that, except the Union Pa- cific, none of these companies have agreed to or will or can accept the terms recommended by the majority. The traffic manager of the Central Pa- cific testified that his company could not pay the debt and that an extension for an indefinite time would not be sufficient to enable it to do so. The fact is that as to all the companies except the 12 Union Pacific their bankruptcy is so complete and irretrievable that no part of their indebtedness can ever be recovered by the Government except by immediate compulsory legal process. Extension of time for payment therefore means in reaUty but an increase of the amount of the debt and the making of its recovery the more hopeless. The bonds of the Union Pacific provided for in the ma- jority report would sell fjor about 50 cents on the dollar, and the bonds of the other companies would not be negotiable. The actual effect, therefore, of the report of the majority of the Commission, is that its recommendation of extension of the time for payment is impractical and impotent as to all these companies except the Union Pacific, and, if adopted, could only result in the failure of the Government to realize any portion of the indebted- ness and would be su l3S t ant i ally a gift of that sum to those companies. For this reason, there- fore, the recommendation of the majority will be considered only so far as it applies to the Union Pacific Railway Company. The people of the West should be freed from the incubus of this enormous load. Eventually the consuming classes, and not the stockholders, must pay this bill if extension of time be granted, and it will be ruinous to the communities which are dependent on the Union Pacific if they are forced to bear their share of this great burden, while communities on other roads bear only the burdens of moderate capitalization. So long as the Union Pacific Railway Company is forced to carry this debt, enterprise and development along its line will be measurably repressed. The extension being unwise and impracticable, there is only one course open to Congress, and that is an immediate winding up of the affairs of all the companies, enabling the Government to with- draw at once from all connection with the running BANCROFT LIEHARY iUTRO. JUNC 1939 13 of railroads, or sharing in the profits of their man- agement. There ought to be an end to the part- nership between the Government and the Pacific raih'oads; a speedy and absolute divorce. The only method by which this result can be reached is that which was suggested by Justice Hunt in the Credit Mobilier cases. It is the alter- native pointed out by the Wilson committee of Congress in the event of 'the failure of the equity proceedings in the United States Courts. It is the course that Congress directed the Attorney-Gen- eral, by resolution of April 10, 1869 (section 4), to take against the Union Pacific — that is, the forfeiture of the charter. The beginning of proceedings at this time to cause the forfeiture of the charters of these com- panies because of their violations of law and fail- ure to keep their contract with the Government is only to anticipate by a few years the result which will be inevitable when the bonds mature in 1895 and 1897. To wait until then before instituting legal proceedings would not avert the result, but would further jeopardize the interests of the Gov- ernment and increase the amount of the indebted- ness. It should be borne in mind that it is a fact^ admitted by every officer of these roads who tes-^^ tified before the Commission, and overwhelmingly . proved by the evidence submitted, that the pay- ment of the debts at maturity, in 1895 and 1897, can under no circumstance bo expected. The rail- road officials, the Commissioners and every intelli- gent citizen, concur in the correctness of this state- ment. Upon forfeiture, the appointment of a re- ceiver should be applied for to provide for the im- mediate settlement of the Government's debt. This course involves no actuarial computations or involved legal problems. It is the direct path to the complete solution of a tangle into which the Government should never have been drawn. This n 14 course is not recommended for the purpose of pun- ishing this company, or its stockholders, for the willful and continuous violation of obligations im- posed by law, but to withdraw the Government from further connection with private enterprises. The stockholders would have the same right to buy that others would have. In this way the Government would cut loose from all participation in' railroad management; it would recover its debt, and put its seal of condem- nation upon the multiplied wrongs that have marked the administration of that trust. The capital and indebtedness of the purchasing companies should be limited to the estimates of the cost of reproduction as made by the inspecting engineer of the Commission — 66f per cent, in bonds and 33 J per cent, in stocks. THq pur- chasing company should bo confined solely to the business of a common carrier, operating rail- road and telegraph lines, and should be forbidden, directly or indirectly, to invest in the bonds or securities of companies other than railroads, or in railroads that are parallel or competing, or to acquire by purchase or otherwise, any interest or control in any competing or parallel line. The officers of the company should be prohibited from being interested in any competing or parallel lines, and such company should not be permitted to hold any real estate, except such as may be neces- sary for its legitimate business, and it should be allowed to issue stocks or bonds only for money, labor done, or money or property actually received. The sale should also be made upon the condition that the franchises should be exercised thereafter, subject to the regulation and control of the Gov- ernment, in the public interest. Such a course would force other transcontinental lines to a similar basis, and would benefit consu- mers in all parts of the country. Transportation 1 BANCROFT LIBRARY SUTRO. JUNE I9CQ 15 would be cheapened; the companies would be liberated from the crushing weight of their debts and made useful arteries of commerce, and a rea- sonable profit would be yielded to honest invest- ments. In addition to the recommendation of the forfeiture of the charters, I would suggest that, through the receiver to be appointed for the Union Pacific, a suit be instituted with like purpose to that begun in 1873, against the Credit Mobilier, and that the Attorney General be instructed to institute proceedings, either civil or criminal, against all persons who have rendered themselves liable for their participation in the issue of stock or the making of mortgages or pledges upon the property or future earnings of the Union Pacific Company without leave of Congress ; against those who violated their trusts in connection with the consolidation of the Kansas Pacific, Denver Pacific and Union Pacific in January, 1880; against all persons who have rendered themselves liable through the maladministration of the Central Pacific, Sioux City and Pacific, and Central Branch Union Pacific ; against telegraph and ex- press companies, to secure an accounting to the Government for earnings on business done on bond-aided lines, and to require an accounting for lands improperly acquired from the Government, and to force the patenting of lands already granted to the companies. In applying the remedies necessary for securing the Government indebtedness, the Attorney Gene- ral should proceed against all persons and corpora- tions who in any way were parties to or partici- pants in the results of any of the illegal and fraudu- lent acts which characterized the management of these corporations and resulted in the waste and misappropriation of the funds of the companies and consequent depreciation of the government security. If this recommendation should be adopted, the population of the great West through which the 16 lines of road extend would have these pubHc high- ways existing and managed as it was intended by law they should be, in the interest and for the ben- efit of the people, and not as subjects for stock gambling and speculative practices through which enormous fortunes are amassed by railroad officials and favorites, while communities are burdened and private industry repressed. In other words, these roads, as a result of legal purgation, would be free, clear, and clean public highways, honestly and lawfully managed. The time of the Commission was so limited that it had no opportunity to visit the various localities that are served by the Central Pacific Railroad Company but from the reports of the railroad commission of California, it is apparent that the abuses of power which have characterized the management of the Union Pacific Company w^ere also practiced by the Central Pacific Railroad Company in its relations with shippers and com- munities. Its conduct in this respect provoked serious political contests in California, and im- pelled the people of that State to adopt amend- ments to the State constitution regulatnig railroads and creating a State commission to protect ship- pers against the discriminations of the Central Pacific Company. In that State, as in the terri- tory tributary to the Union Pacific, there was in- terference with the lawful pursuits of the people; and as appears in page 128 of the State railroad commission's report for 188B, there were fears entertained by merchants of retaliation by the rail- road company if complaints should be made against it. With the Union Pacific Company, it devised the special-contract system and also attempted, by investing in other enterprises than those of trans- portation and by pools and combinations, to control trifiG Robert E. Pattison, Commissioner. Washington, Becemher 1, 1887. 7 '• %