UNlVBRStTY OF j CALIFOr.HlA J ANTHROPOLOGY UBKABX KAFIR SOCIALISM AGENTS AMERICA . . . THE MACMILLAN COMPANY 64 & 66 FIFTH AVENUE, NEW YORK AUSTRALASIA . THE OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS, MELBOURNE CANADA . , . THE MACMILLAN COMPANY OF CANADA, LTD., 27 RICHMOND STREET WEST, TORONTO INDIA .... MACMILLAN AND COMPANY, LTD. MACMILLAN BUILDING, BOMBAY 309 BOW BAZAAR 8TREET,CALCUTTA KAFIR SOCIALISM AND THE DAWN OF INDIVIDUALISM AN INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY OF THE NATIVE PROBLEM BY DUDLEY KIDD AUTHOR OF 'THE ESSENTIAL KAFIR," "SAVAGE CHILDUOOD," &C. LONDON ADAM AND CHARLES BLACK 1908 Q,\\^ 3A .V-^ N^Q, -•^r'*" ■S^ PREFACE Racial questions, democratic ideals, and the problems of Socialism are in the air. The world is filling up fast, and aggregates, whether of nations, races or classes, are now being sifted drastically by the process of natural selection. Aristocracies, majorities, and minorities, whether of races or classes, seem to have entered on the acute stage of their probation. No matter where we turn, whether to South Africa with its Boer and Native problems, to America with its Negro and Japanese difficulties, to Russia with its nightmare, to India and Egypt with their agitations for self-government, to the Balkans with its tangle, to the Congo with its struggles and tragedies amid primaeval forests, to Australia with its fear of Kanakas and Japanese , to Mohammedans with their aspirations for Pan-Islamism, to Asia in its awakening, or to Europe with its rising tide of Democracy and Socialism, we are face to face with the struggle for existence that is taking place between groups of men that are fighting for very life. In the case of races and classes, just as in the case of individuals, those that are the most efficient in their adaptation to environment, and not those that simply give expression to the loftiest sentiment, will survive and dominate all rivals ; while the weak and inefficient will go to the wall. We shall be occupied in these pages with but a single \7M?r^ vi PREFACE race ; though the future of the Kafii-, and our duty to him, will take us into several fields of thought. The present volume deals with but one aspect of the Native Problem, namely, the conflict of Western conceptions of Individualism with the ingrained Socialism of the Kafir. This aspect of the problem is isolated for several reasons. In the first place, no treatment of all the aspects of the Native Problem can hope to be altogether satisfactory unless it takes the form of a symposium in which experts in native thought, economics, politics, education, and missions combine to present the various aspects of this many-sided problem. There seems to be no person who possesses all the qualities necessary for such a work. In the second place, so far as I know — and I think I have read every book that has been written on the subject — ^the very existence of the above-mentioned aspect of the problem has not even been recognised by any previous writer. In the third place, the conflict of European Individualism with Kafir Socialism constitutes the very heart of the problem. No one has written more wisely about the Native Problem than Mr. Colquhoun ; and yet he not only failed to recognise the existence of this conflict of Socialism and Individualism, but has actually stated that the socialistic ideal is a conception that cannot possibly take hold of the Kafir. I shall quote presently the actual words used by Mr. Colquhoun ; and hope to prove that, so far from being alien to native thought. Socialistic ideals affect almost every conception of the Kafirs, giving colour and form even to their ideas about such widely different things as justice and witchcraft. There is a further and final reason for not attempting a PREFACE vii complete discussion of the Native Problem. It is a most unsuitable time to make such an attempt, because the present Liberal Government, by reserving the affairs of the Kafirs in the Transvaal and Orange River Colony for its own special care, and by interfering in the native affairs of Natal, is virtually stifling discussion ; for what colonist cares to waste his time in presenting a reasoned statement of his views concerning a thousand details of administration when he has every reason for feeling certain that the Party that meditates interference in the domestic affairs of South Africa will be guided, not by facts and sound sense, but by the uninformed sentiment of " moral experts " ? For the above reasons — and assured that Home inter- ference is the transient whim of a political clique rather than the settled will of the people — I have decided to make this volume simply an introduction to, and not a detailed study of, the Native Problem. The native point of view, which I have sought to explain, is of great importance, though it is not the only point of view. Unless we clearly understand native conceptions and ideals, we shall but reckon without our host. In South Africa we are all aware that we are building up our commercial, industrial, political and social structure at the foot of a volcano ; but like all Pompeians, we have become so accustomed to the manifold dangers of the situa- tion that we do not worry very much about our Vesuvius. Every now and then we feel some very disquieting and ominous rumblings beneath our feet, and occasionally see a flash of fire and a puff of smoke, and feel a few ashes falling on our heads ; but the anxiety soon wears off ; officials assure us that the natives are quiet again ; and viii PREFACE every one goes about his work as though there were no danger brewing. The problem is so many-sided and com- plicated that most of us are content to postpone all serious consideration of the subject. We talk about the natives in vague terms, for most of us know but little about the inscrutable Kafirs. There are comparatively few people who have any first-hand and intimate knowledge of the hraal-life of the natives ; and so most of us are content to accept the many floating, commonplace statements that abound in our towns and villages. Opinion takes the place of knowledge, and we are apt to adopt a sort of nonchalant optimism based on our national reputation of muddling through most of our difficulties. The law-abiding nature of the Kafir tends to confirm us in the delusion that the natives are reconciled to a rule which we know to be just and fair. As the result of this attitude towards the subject, the ground is simply littered with half-truths, and with anti- quated though inveterate prejudices. The Kafir that the average white man knows is the semi-civilised barbarian who has suffered from the degenerative influences of civilisa- tion in our centres of industry, on our farms, or in domestic service. The visitor to South Africa picks up some specious and delusive myths about such Kafirs, and if he should write a book, he can scarcely resist the temptation to give the most picturesque of these half-truths a fresh lease of life, a wider currency, and an additional distortion due to his imperfect understanding of a strange and alien race. From the nature of the case, it is impossible even for the globe-trotting Member of Parliament to get to the heart of a racial problem in a visit, the brevity of which PREFACE ix makes it impossible for the out-of-the-way Kafir kraals to be visited. Yet the writer feels bound to spatchcock into his book a chapter dealing with the subject. It is no cause for wonder that Home criticism should so often be wide of the mark, and that the most ludicrous suggestions should from time to time appear in the Press, or should be proposed in the House of Commons. In addition to these sources of information, we have some valuable Blue Books — studies in the anatomy of the subject — that only few people seem to read until the contents are boiled down into magazine articles. There are also among the annual crop of South African books some volumes in which the writers manage to find space for a short chapter on the Native Problem. Though writers who are experts in economics or sport, or some kindred subject, naturally view the Native Problem through their own special key- hole, the result is interesting and not without value ; for it is of great importance to know the bearing of such a side- issue as the Rand Labour-Supply on the Native Problem, even though the writer may assure us that this side- issue is not only the heart but the whole of the problem. The Kafirs say that no elephant ever felt its own trunk to be a burden, and we may therefore safely take some discount of! the opinion of the man with but one idea. But it is not only the mine-owner who is in danger of ignoring the native in his insistence of the importance of some side-issue of the problem : the philanthropist, the person who asks hysterical questions in the House of Commons, and the members of the Aborigines Protection Society are just as much in danger of forgetting the actual Kafir owing to their concentration on their own hobby. X PREFACE It is fatally easy to set up in tlie mind some unreal image of an oppressed and voiceless black man, who is too gentle and peaceable, and witbal too guileless, to provoke hostilities except under the most provoking oppression of some wicked white men. This mental image affords a splendid occasion for giving expression to those most pleasurable and luxurious of all emotions, indignation and pity. A meeting is held, and there is set up an emotional storm in many a tea-cup ; the actual savage is lost sight of, and the " brutality " of the colonist and the humanity of the people at home are apt to become the twin-centres of what the Kafirs call a crab's dance. The question then ceases to be the native, and becomes the white, problem. Under the influence of prejudice or passion, the native, who is the subject of the contention, is lost sight of ; and the real war is waged round such problems as the moral character of the colonist, the nature of the British Constitution, or the abstract idea of Justice, for every one thinks he knows all about these things. The Kafir becomes the ostensible subject of debate in which people exploit their special and peculiar obsessions. The argument becomes practically independent of the actual Kafir of the kraal, and would not be modified much if the aborigines of South Africa were Siamese, Red Indians or even Martians. Every conceiv- able side-interest, prejudice, and false analogy is discussed by these people, whom Carlyle would call Professors of Things in General, and who entirely ignore the real wishes of the Kafir. The Native Problem is the 'problem of the native. This is so obvious when once stated that one would be ashamed to say it unless it were so constantly forgotten. Before we PREFACE xi can understand the bearings of the Native Problem we must study native customs and thought. We shall never get any nearer a solution of the problem by concentrating our attention on the relative values of Home and Colonial sentiment and ethical sense, or on political panaceas for imaginary and non-existent needs, for it is the Kafir, and not our emotion, that is the determining factor in the problem. I have not dealt with the subject of the religious aspect of Missions, though missionaries have done so much to exploit individualism amongst the Kafirs. There is not space available for the treatment of the subject. I fear to say too little or too much, and feel that any inadequate statement would but raise many undesirable misunder- standings. That aspect of the subject must therefore be reserved for a future volume. I am not without hope that the picture of the " savage " that I present may do something to undermine the distorted mental image that is ordinarily awakened by that word. Many a race has opprobriously called another race, that it did not understand, barbarian or savage ; even though that despised race was in some directions the more advanced of the two. The Kafir, contrary to ordinary belief, has the most extraordinarily well-developed spirit of altruism and camaraderie, which is very rarely equalled amongst Western nations. Ethnologists are slowly forcing us to admit that the savage is not so savage as has been supposed. CONTENTS PART I KAFIR SOCIALISM CHAP. PAGE v,^ I. Primitive Socialism ..,,.. 3 y^ II. Kafir Conceptions ok Justice .... 63 III. The Native Franchise . . , . . ^o PART II THE DAWN OF INDIVIDUALISM yr IV. The Education of the Kafir . . . .141 V. Can the Ethiopian change his Skin.^ . . 198 VI. The First Step towards the Solution of the Native Problem 266 PAUT I KAFIR SOCIALISM N CHAPTER I PRIMITIVE SOCIALISM In discussions as to whether Socialism would or would not stop progress and remove incentives to the strenuous life, appeal is not uncommonly made to the imagination, and opinion is pitted against opinion. When prophets, armed with private revelations, vie with one another, it is hopeless to judge as to the truth or falseness of the opposed predic- tions by weighing the relative confidence and assurance shown by the contending parties. If we could but leave imagination and prophecy on one side, and examine facts, our position would be much simplified. Ethnology is able, most fortunately, to supply us ^^^th such facts. To all civilised people face to face with the problem of Sociahsm, a study of the Clan-System of the Kafirs should be of much interest, for it is an attempt on the part of a primitive people to solve on a lower plane problems we are seeking to solve on a higher. The system has been working for ages, and so the socialistic* experiment has had time to bear its characteristic fruit. In examining Kafir Socialism it may be well to keep before us Rousseau's famous definition of the Social Pact : " To find a form of association which may defend and * The word socialism is used in these pages to connote an organi- sation of society in which the means of life — whether production, distribution, or protection — are held in eollectiye ownership. 4 KAFIR SOCIALISM protect, with the whole force of the community, the person and property of every associate, and by means of which each, coalescing with all, may nevertheless only obey himself, and remain as free as before. . . . Such is the fundamental problem of which the social contract furnishes the solution." * The Kafirs certainly fulfil the conditions of the pact, and the following pages will show how far they have been able to " remain as free as before." The Kafirs may not have such a complete and highly developed organisation as the Indian village communities, yet they are, nevertheless, thorough-going collectivists. Their very babes are Socialists. The roots of their social policy are to be found in their Clan-System, which must now be described. I, The Clan-System According to this system, the native races of South Africa are divided up into a number of tribes, each of which is composed of a number of clans, each of which, again, consists of a group of families. The children are responsible ,. vn^ to the father ; he is responsible to the head-manrwHo, in turn, is responsible to the petty chief; while the petty ^ chiefs are responsible to the Paramount Chief or king. A Paramount Chief, therefore, has to watch the interests of the entire tribe ; the petty chiefs have to watch the interests of the various clans ; the head-men have to watch the interests of their respective groups of families, and the father has to watch the interests of his family, even when the sons are grown up. Group-association and * " Social Contract." English translation by Tozer, p. 109. .-^ PRIMITIVE SOCIALISM 5 responsibility are therefore the essence of the system. There is considerable latitude as to the details of the plan, and as to the extent of powers committed to these various people in different tribes. In one tribe the chief may be more or less assisted by, and responsible to, a number of old councillors ; while in another tribe the chief may be an absolute tyrant. Such a chief can do no wrong. His will is the will of the people, who do not complain about the abuses of his power, because it is the will of the people that the will of the chief should be supreme. It is as though they said to their chief : " We govern ourselves by choosing to do what you tell us." Thus we have the strange phenomenon of self-government taking the form of an Autocracy or Tyranny. In those tribes in which the chief is less autocratic, the people only exert their power very indirectly and occasionally ; and even in such tribes it is not true to say, as it has been stated recently in the Home Press, that the Kafirs are a " pure democracy." Even so careful a writer as Mr. Colquhoun has said strangely that Afrikanders " must see for themselves that to introduce Socialism and Democracy to the Kafir is to destroy their strongest hold on him. The conception is not one which can get any real hold of a people just emerging from the tribal state." * In that sentence two different things are confused — Socialism and Democracy. The Kafirs reject the Democracy with all their nature, while they welcome the Socialism with every fibre of their being. They differ from Western Socialists in the fact that they are the firmest believers in both Autocracy (or should we say * " The Afrikander Land," p. 118. 6 KAFIR SOCIALISM Aristocracy?) and Socialism; and there is no reason why the socialistic state should not " run " itself through its own chosen autocratic chiefs or councillors. The various departments of life that have been socialised, or tribalised, by the Kafirs must now be passed under review. It will be seen that so far from the conception of Socialism not being able to get hold of a people emerging from the tribal state, it is the very breath of their life. (a) The Individual and all his Rights. — Amongst the Kafirs, the person of the individual belongs in theory to the chief : he is not his own, for he is the chief's man. It is extremely difficult for us, with our advanced conception of the inviolability of the rights of the individual, to appreciate the bearing of this fact. Philanthropists some- times draw the most unwarrantable conclusions from their imperfect understanding of the native's idea : they catch a glimpse of one aspect of this matter, and their sentiment becomes so deeply affected and engaged that they have not patience to study the subject from the Kafir point of view, but at once cry out for the abolition of this intolerable power of the chief. The relation of the individual to the chief can be under- stood from the following statement made by a Zulu, who was describing to a white man the custom of the Festival of First Fruits. He said : " The Zulus, if the mealies are ripe, are not permitted by themselves to eat them. The king must always give them permission before they do so. If somebody is eating new mealies, before the king has given his permission, he will be killed entirely. The white men are wondering about it, and say : ' Is a man not allowed to go into his own garden for harvesting food, PRIMITIVE SOCIALISM 7 which he planted himself, and to eat it ? ' But the Zulus are not wondering about that, saying : ' We are all the king's men : our bodies, our power, our food, and all that we have, is the king's property. It is quite right that we do not commence to eat new mealies unless the king has permitted it.' " * " Zulus are not wondering about that " : what pregnant words are these ! This custom of the Feast of First Fruits has been designed, probably, partly as a taboo to prevent the squandering of the tribal food-supply, and partly as a means of insuring that the amatongo, or ancestral spirits, shall get their due, and so be kept well disposed towards the tribe. The native also readily understands that his own impulse of greediness must not be allowed to override his social obligations, for the interest of the clan is really his highest interest : apart from the prosperity of the clan, the individual has no security whatever ; consequently the Kafir sees that it would never do for every man to do what is right in his own eyes ; if they did that, the tribe would be at the mercy of surrounding enemies who knew how to curb the anti-social or asocial actions of its members. " Zulus are not wondering about that ! " Evidently that which puzzles, and sometimes obsesses, the mind of the white man, and which seems to him so absurdly unjust, is no cause of wonder to the Kafir. To him the matter seems essentially just and reasonable. Let the European but once accept the data which are impHcitly accepted by the Zulus, and the conclusion follows, for the logic is not at * South African Folk-Lore Journal. The expression " killed entirely " is used in a somewhat Irish sense, for the disobedient Zulu will probably only suffer considerable gastric disturbance, largely induced by his imaginative fears of breaking a taboo. 8 KAFIR SOCIALISM fault. Our own progress should teach us that national advance is due rather to the changing of our data as to " rights " than to an improvement in our logic. i When we come to speak of the sense of justice, this saying of the Zulu will be found of value in showing how a Kafir differs from a European in his conception of justice and of " rights." But in this place it is merely given to show how entirely the rights of the clan supersede those of the individual. So fully does the individual belong to the head of the tribe, that a chief, named Shiluvane, issued the decree : " I do not allow of anybody dying in my country except on account of old age." This command was given with a view to the checking of the use of sorcery and witchcraft to murder people ; for the chief imagined that old age was the natural cause of death, and that none of his warriors could die in the prime of life unless they were bewitched by some private enemy. But the very expres- sion, " I allow no one to die," shows how completely the people were regarded as the property of their chief. The very existence of the tribe depends upon the existence and maintenance of a great number of mature and able- bodied human beings : and in this sense the people them- selves may be regarded as a means of production, for it is they who create and protect the tribe. For this reason, the individuals with all their personal rights must be socialised and brought into subjection to the recognised head of the tribe. In theory, the entire property of all the members of the tribe belongs to the chief. When bargaining with the Kafirs for such things as assegais, and even snuff-boxes, the native, when reluctant to sell, has said that he had no PRIMITIVE SOCIALISM 9 right to part with the property of his chief. It is true that this line of argument is advanced more frequently when the article the European wants to buy is a weapon of war than when it is such a thing as a snuff-box, which is practi- cally of no tribal value. But Kafirs have advanced this reason to me even when refusing to sell a wooden spoon. However, the Kafir never pushes a thing to what a European would regard as a logical conclusion. He has a sweet reasonableness ; and when he covets the object offered in barter, he conveniently forgets all about the theoretical rights of his chief, and readily parts even with an assegai. It should be pointed out, in passing, that in every direction we meet with this disinclination to push principles to their logical conclusions, and a failure to recognise this fact not improbably accounts for some of the conflicting theories with regard to the natives and their customs that have been advanced hastily by some observers. Since the bodies of all the members of the tribe belong to the chief, any damage done to the person of the individual is regarded as a criminal offence, and restitution has to be made, not to the person injured, but to the chief. Thus if A breaks B's leg, or knocks out his eye, he has to pay damages, not to B, but to the chief. When a white magi- strate reverses this procedure, the natives think he is doing the tribe an injury, for he is putting a premium on anti- social selfishness. The action of the white man is therefore regarded as an immoral one. Thus the tables are turned, and instead of Glaucon's objection, " 'Tis a city of pigs, Socrates," applying to the socialistic state, it would be used by a Kafir as a remark appHcable to our individualistic regime. 10 KAFIR SOCIALISM We come now to the question of personal property, and find that, in this matter also, the Kafirs show their excellent moderation. The people regard their cattle as their own property, for the chief has his oxen, and the people have theirs. We may perhaps say that the cattle form the money of the people ; and yet even the cattle are held at the discretion of the chief, who is entirely justified in appropriat- ing them should a man fail in performing his tribal duty. Thus, when a man is convicted of using witchcraft,* and is therefore considered guilty of a grossly anti-social action, he is " eaten up " by the chief, who may either keep the man's cattle for himself or divide them up amongst his councillors. In the eyes of the Kafirs this is not spoliation, for the chief has but taken back what all along was his own. Thus it will be seen that Kafir practice agrees with ancient Roman custom. Maine says : " Peculium — a few head of oxen kept apart — was the name which the Romans gave to the permissive separate property allowed to the son or a slave. No principle was more persistent in Roman law than the subjection of the ^jecwZmwi to the authority of the paterf amilas or the master, should he choose to exercise it. . . . When the house community is in its primitive and natural state there is no feculium : there is none in Monte- negro ; the dominant notion there is that as the community is liable for the delinquences of its members, it is entitled to receive all the produce of their labour." f It will thus be seen that the Kafirs are in very good company on this subject, and that their system is undeserving * Not infrequently the accusation of using sorcery is trumped up against any one guilty of anti-social practices, so as to provide an occasion for giving vent to indignation. f " Dissertations on Early Law and Custom," pp. 251, 252. PRIMITIVE SOCIALISM 11 of tlie plentiful abuse that is showered on it by some philanthropists. Dr. SchaflBle, in his " Quintessence of Socialism," explodes a common misunderstanding when he says : " In opposition to all contrary views, which have been very widely spread, it must be emphatically stated that Socialism does not universally exclude either property in general or private property in particular. The principle of collective labour does, indeed, demand plainly, and pretty exclusively, collective capital, but it does not without ceremony deny the admissibility of private property." * The Kafirs, however, only allow people to hold private property and cattle when this does not conflict with the good of the community ; they make short work of the man who grows too rich and who neglects the interest of the clan. Such a man is sure to be accused of amassing wealth by using sorcery, and is consequently " eaten up " by the chief. Without going further, it should be evident that the Clan-System is based on obligations to be performed by the individual and not on the man's rights. It is the Kafir's primary obligation to sacrifice, if needs be, every, thing for the good of the clan, and his individual rights are wholly subservient, contingent, and secondary to the performance of his obligations. This sound basis of the social state is undoubtedly one of the main causes of the stability of Kafir society. To do anything that is anti- social is the one heinous offence : nay, it is more, for it is the one hopeless case of " bad form," It is a striking tiling that it should be in primitive peoples and amongst English school-boys, the very classes in which there exists the * Op. cit., English translation, p, 101. 12 KAFIR SOCIALISM intensest egoism, that the strongest spirit of communism should be found. School-boys have organised their social forces against their common enemy — their masters : it is therefore the height of treachery, for it is utterly anti- social, for a boy to " sneak," and so put his clan at the mercy of the enemy. Similarly a school-boy who fails to do his duty to his school, soon finds himself deprived of many coveted privileges. The analogy need not be laboured, for we all know how strong is the communistic spirit amongst English school-boys, and how much more " sporting " it is than the unchecked individualism of later life. But, in the case of the Kafirs, it may be well to point out an apparent exception that helps to prove the rule. Every Kafir is supposed to be a sort of policeman, and it is his duty to report to his father, or head-man, or petty chief, any violation of clan-interests that he has observed. He is his brother's keeper in fact and not merely in theory. All this might appear to an English boy as an example of " sneaking." But it is not so ; for a Kafir only gives information against another man when that person has violated clan-interests : he would never think of doing it in the case of private quarrels. The tribal solidarity is further strengthened by the regulations concerning marriage. No man is allowed to marry a woman of his own clan, even though she should be but a fifth or sixth cousin ; but he must marry within his tribe.* There are few things that scandalise the Kafir more than to hear a missionary approve of the marriage of cousins. The Kafirs are intensely particular in not allow- ing marriages where any blood-relationship can be traced : * A tribe may contain more than a hundred clans. PRIMITIVE SOCIALISM 13 they are also, in their natural condition, very averse from marriages betAveen members of different tribes. All this, naturally, consolidates the clan. There is a great danger in interfering with racial problems. Largely owing to the natural difficulty that arises from the entire difference in point of view adopted by the Anglo- Saxon and the Kafir, it comes about that our sentiment is offended at the utter ignoring of the " rights " of the individual. We are apt to regard the Kafir as but the chattel of the chief. But this is a great mistake, and easily leads to trouble. Maine has pointed out that : " Wherever servitude is sanctioned by institutions which have been deeply affected by Roman jurisprudence, the servile condition is never intolerably wretched. There is a great deal of evidence that in those American States which have taken the highly Romanised code of Louisiana as the basis of their jurisprudence, the lot and prospects of the negro population were better in many material respects, until the letter of the fundamental law was overlaid by recent statutory enactments passed under the influence of panic, than under institutions founded on the English Common Law, which, as recently interpreted, has no true place for the slave, and can only, therefore, regard him as a chattel." * This is a typical example of the unfortunate effects of Anglo- Saxon action based on a misunderstanding of unfamiliar conceptions. Professor Westermarck points out : " From a moral point of view negro slavery is interesting chiefly be- cause it existed in the midst of a highly developed Christian civilisation, and nevertheless, at least in the British Colonies and the United States, was the most brutal form of slavery * " Ancient Law," p. 170. 14 KAFIR SOCIALISM ever known. . . . Through the direct action of Congress it became law that persons known to be free should be sold as slaves in order to cover the costs of imprisonment which they had suffered on account of a false suspicion that they were runaway slaves. This law was repeatedly put into effect. ' How many crowned despots,' says Professor Von Hoist — he might have said, how many autocratic Kafir chiefs — ' can be mentioned in the history of the old world who have done things which compare in accursedness with this law to which the democratic republic gave birth ? '" Similarly, any ignorant " democratic " interference on our part with regard to Kafir customs based on the con- ception of the obligations of the people to sacrifice their " rights " for the good of the clan is certain to produce trouble of the most deplorable kind. Later on we shall examine some of the unexpected results arising from this cause. (6) Military Forces. — The safety of the tribe — indeed its very existence — depends on the efficient organisation of its military forces. Every individual is therefore compelled to sink his own private wishes and perform his share of military service. Every able-bodied man — that is to say, every man, for amongst the Kafirs in their " raw " state all weaklings are killed off in infancy — is a soldier, and has to go undergo military training. Tshaka, the great Zulu despot, gathered the manhood of his tribe into regiments which lived in military kraals, and which were maintained at public expense. These men were not allowed to marry until the chief gave them permission, for it was essential that their fibre should not be softened PRIMITIVE SOCIALISM 15 unduly by domestic life. The very boys were herded together into military kraals, and had to serve as baggage- carriers for the army. The man who refused to perform his military duties would have been hounded out of his tribe, being regarded as a worthless and anti-social wretch. The Kafirs would stand aghast at the insipid and tepid Socialism of the English Labour Party, for they would regard their anti-military emotionalism as utterly effeminate. (c) Hunting.— Co-oi^eTation in hunting has such obvious advantages that it obtains in all primitive societies. The Kafir system of tribal hunting is very interesting. Having elsewhere described at length a tribal hunt,* a brief summary must here suffice. A couple of days in advance of the hunt, the chief sends messengers — usually boys of about sixteen years of age — to tell the people at what hour to arrive at the Great Place, as his kraal is called. These boys are duly ac- credited as messengers, those I have seen being distinguished by two circular patches of red paint at the top of the arm. On the day appointed, the people arrive at the Great Place, clan by clan, and greet the chief, who pretends not to know who the differe it people are until one of the councillors pronounces the ,'sibongo, or surname, of each clan. On hearing the name, the chief pretends to show great delight and praises the men excessively. The tribal diviners, or doctors, then come upon the scene, working magical practices and investigating the omens. When they pronounce that everything is favourable, the whole crowd scatters, and clan by clan the people take their place as they surround a large district that has been pointed out previously to * "The Essential Kafir," p. 316. 16 KAFIR SOCIALISM them. The boys act as beaters ; and it is the duty of all the men to drive the game to a common centre where the chief has taken up his position. As the circle gets narrower and narrower, the terrified game grow very wild, and finally turn completely silly, running straight on to the assegais that everywhere surround them. Any one who kills a buck immediately puts it on his shoulder, and, running up to the chief, lays it on the ground at his feet. Possibly half a dozen claimants come up, each maintaining that he has had a hand in the killing of the animal. The chief decides all such claims on the spot, and everybody is satisfied. The man who is judged to have killed the animal carries it away and is allowed to reserve it, not for himself, but for his family or group ; but if the chief should happen to have decided that another man's dog helped to hold the animal while it was being killed, then a leg of the animal — it would sometimes need ten legs to satisfy all the claimants— has to be given to the man as his share of the spoil : but even this man does not regard the leg of the buck as his private property, for he shares it with his group of friends. There are times when the natives hunt privately, but the tribal hunts are the great events, for sometimes enormous quantities of game are then secured. Wild animals originally formed a large part of the food- supply of the tribe : it was therefore thought that the game belonged to the community, and that no private individual had the right to warn people off any private preserve. Thus the hunting of game was socialised, while there was a certain amount of reasonable liberty granted to the individual to hunt privately. PRIMITIVE SOCIALISM 17 (d) Land. — All the land owned by the tribe is vested in the chief, who allows every man to use as much ground as his wives can till. No land can be sold, entailed, or devised, and yet a man knows that his gardens will never be taken from him so long as he cultivates them. All unallotted land that is not required for gardens, together with all wood and water, is regarded as common property for the grazing of cattle or for the needs of all the members of the clan. The nationalisation of land is therefore absolute. It is important to note that it was the sense of the solidarity of the clan that led to the tribalisation of the land. It is easy to imagine the institution of a carefully thought-out plan of land-tenure devised so as to prevent scandalous selfishness and neglect of the good of the people, and also so as to produce and fostex a spirit of camaraderie and social union : but this is not what happened amongst the Kafirs ; for in their case the system of land-tenure is the effect and not the cause of their communism. In their case individual self-consciousness is not fully developed, though the clan-consciousness is amazingly strong. The individual amongst the Kafirs to a large extent confuses (we might say fuses) himself with his clan, and therefore has not that strong sense of personal property and " rights " that obtains amongst people who have become acutely conscious of their own individuality. Again, this nationalisation of land did not arise out of a sense of territorial sovereignty, for the chiefs were not the chiefs of Zululand, Basutoland, nor of any other " land " ; they were the chiefs of the Zulus, the Basutos, and so forth. " Territorial sovereignty — the view which connects sovereignty with the possession of a limited portion B 18 ' KAFIR SOCIALISM of the earth's surface — was distinctly an of£-shoot, though a tardy one, of feudalism. This might have been expected a priori, for it was feudalism which, for the first time, linked personal duties, and by consequence personal rights, to the ownership of land." * It would be difficult to devise a more complete socialising of land than that adopted by the Kafirs ; and no wonder the natives are scandalised when they see a missionary putting up a fence around a certain plot of land and declar- ing that it is his private property. " But, eh ! " says the Kafir, " how the white man eats up our land ! " (e) Administration of Justice. — In any case of dispute, a man would appeal, naturally, first of all to the head-man of the group : if he were not satisfied with the opinion of the head-man, he would bring the matter before the petty cliief, and only in important cases would he make the final appeal to the Paramount Chief. So thoroughly is justice regarded as a thing within the tribe that a man is only responsible for injuries he does to members of his own tribe. In fact there is no court that is competent to sit on an inter-tribal affair. A man who injures a person belonging to a hostile or rival tribe does a meritorious action in the eyes of his own clan. " International law," says Holland, " can subsist only between States which, on the one hand, sufficiently resemble one another, and are close enough knit together by common interests to be susceptible of the uniform pressure of public opinion, while, on the other hand, they are not so politically combined as to be controlled by the force of a central authority." "j" * Maine : " Ancient Law," 10th edit, p. 108. f " Jurisprudence," p. 370. PRIMITIVE SOCIALISM 19 There can therefore be no inter-tribal law in the case of the Kafirs. Every now and then a chief may send a daughter to another chief with the view of forming an alliance, or of compelHng him to admit his dependence on the sender of the girl. The chief must either accept the girl as wife, and so accept the alliance, or the position of subordina- tion, as the case may be, or he must drive back the girl and prepare for war. This demand for alliance or submission is perhaps the nearest approach the Kafirs can show to international law. If a person feared that he was going to be " eaten up " by his chief, he might escape and take refuge with the chief of another tribe—" Live under his shadow," as the Kafijs graphically say. In that case he would have to pay a number of cattle to the new chief as a guarantee for good behaviour. ^Vhen the new chief accepts the cattle he becomes, ifso facto, responsible for the protection of the fugitive, who, having failed in his old tribal obligations of course loses his old tribal privileges. The only peaceable way in which the original chief can get back his escaped subject is by paying a greater number of cattle to the chief with whom the man has taken refuge. Should this prove inefiective, the only other appeal is to war. A recent writer, wishing to make out a case against her own nation, has recently revived an unsavory episode that took place in Natal more than thirty years ago. But her case could not be made out without inventing the existence of a " fundamental " inter-tribal law, forbidding a chief from following a fugitive. It was therefore evolved from the imagination, the writer forgetting that the very existence 20 KAFIR SOCIALISM of the Clan-System indicates a social condition anterior to the recognition of " frontiers," or of local contiguity as a political bond. Had she but understood Kafir thought, she would have seen that no Kafir would be scandalised at our action, which was in keeping with native custom. Mr. Brownlee, writing in 1858, says : " About forty years since, it was lawful to put a man to death for the act of adultery ; but Gaika abolished this law and ever since, bloodshed, in a case of this nature, is punished as murder. ... A man is punished for taking the law into his own hands ; and in no case is he justified in doing so, even in a case of retaliation. There is this to be observed, that the above remarks refer to people of one tribe ; but if the case were between people of different tribes, and the injured person obtained no redress, he would retaliate on any one of the other tribe who came within his power, and in this would be supported by his chief until redress was obtained ; but there does not appear to be any law to sanction the custom." * Thus tribal law may restrain a man from injuring a member of his own tribe, but there is no constraint in connection with violence or injury done to a person outside the closed circle of the tribe. It is strange that Brownlee did not see that there could be no " law " in such a case ; for in the first place, a custom needs no law for its support, as in primitive races custom supports the law which it creates ; and in the second place, a law only holds good within the tribe, as there is no vestige of machinery for international or inter-tribal law. In such matters might is the only right. We thus see that the administration of justice is, in the fullest sense of the word, tribalised. * McLean's "Compendium of Kafir Law." .lIRSITY li PRIMITIVE SOCIALISM 21 (/) Magic. — There are three errors that are so deeply- ingrained in European minds that one almost despairs of eradicating them : they are, first, that magic in the eyes of savages is regarded as a use of supernatural forces ; secondly, that magic is the same thing as witchcraft ; tliirdly, that witch-doctors are sorcerers, witches, or wizards. With regard to the fii"st of these errors, it cannot be too clearly stated that the savage regards magic as no more supernatural than such a thing as the rising of the sun, or the growing of the crops, or the falling of a stone to the earth. Magic is no more supernatural than is the electrical dynamo, though it may pass the wit of a plough-boy to conceive how the cunning machine works. The machine may be beyond the comprehension of the lad, who does not, however, imagine that it therefore works by super- natural forces, for he is aware that it was made by men who know more about the laws of this strange universe than he does. In the eyes of the Kafir, the diviner is simply a cunning man who understands, better than ordinary people, the inner working of nature. It follows, as a matter of course, that the diviner can use forces for the service of man in ways that pass the understanding of ordinary folk. With regard to the second error, magic is the legitimate social use of these forces of nature, while witchcraft is the private and illicit anti-social use of such forces. The State regulates the use of the secret knowledge of nature's ways, and sees that it is used for the common good of the tribe. The tribal diviner, or magician, therefore, not only con- founds the politics but also frustrates the knavish tricks of the common enemy. He is the bulwark of society. The person who uses witchcraft, however, is supposed to 22 KAFIR SOCIALISM have found out some of these secrets of nature wliicli he (or she) uses so as to avenge injuries, or to secure illicit and immoderate gain, purely for personal and anti-social ends. With regard to the third error, the sorcerer (the witch or wizard) is the person who either uses these secret forces of nature for his own ends, or who secretly sells his knowledge or puts it at the disposal either of the enemies of the tribe or of people who wish to pay out their own personal grudges regardless of public interests. He is the enemy of the tribe, for he has no regard to its interests. The diviner — the so-called witch-doctor — is the man appointed by the State to use all these tremendous forces of nature for the common good of the tribe. He knows how to ward off evil from the tribe, how to doctor the army, how to form a veritable ring of defence around a kraal or a country into which charmed circle no wizard who is the enemy of the clan> and no disease, can enter. This clever man knows how to make charms to induce the crops to grow ; he knows how to kill the locusts ; and he knows how to prevent the spread of disease, and, in short, to secure the well-being of all the members of the tribe. He is the sworn enemy of the sorcerers ; and it is one of his main functions to detect and " smell out " these anti-social charlatans. All these excellent functions are rarely united in the person of one human being, for there is, as a rule, the duly appointed crops-doctor, the locust-doctor, the witch-detecting doctor, the rain-doctor, the medicinal- or herb-doctor, the war- doctor, the lightning-doctor, and so forth. There is a class of magical practices that comes between these two divisions of tribal magic and personal witchcraft. PRIMITIVE SOCIALISM 23 The Kafirs are for ever using sucli innocent things as love- charms, which are neither regarded as detrimental to the clan nor as of much use to it. There is thus a sort of neutral zone which is regarded as quite harmless ; native girls or young men will even go to white traders to buy such things as magnets or the prismatic glasses of chandeliers with which to attract and hold the affections of some other person. It should now be clear what it is that the Kafir condemns in connection with witchcraft. He does not think it wrong to use the hidden forces of nature, but he thinks it extremely base for a person to use these forces for anti-social purposes. Magic is socialised, and the private individual must recognise this fact. Let us imagine for a moment that some English- man were to discover such a thing as the Heat Ray of Mr. Wells's Martians,* wherewith he could frizzle up whole crowds of men and entire regiments of soldiers. Would not there be a popular outcry that the State, instead of allowing an irresponsible person to make havoc of our population, should interfere and control this force ? In the eyes of the Kafir the witch or wizard has somewhat similar powers at beck and call, and the natives naturally desire such a force to be socialised or controlled by the tribe. The Rev. H. A. Junod, in a most interesting and valuable paper on " The Theory of Witchcraft amongst South African Natives," has thrown much light on the subject. Yet towards the end of his paper he says : "It may seem * Rsference might also be made to the fears of people half a century ago concerning mesmerism and its possible use for criminal purposes. 24 KAFIR SOCIALISM inexplicable that millions of human beings who possess a fair amount of reason and of common sense . . . can enter- tain such absurd, dreadful ideas. But let us remember that three centuries ago European tribunals were con- demning wholesale hundreds of poor people accused of witchcraft. There, however, was a capital difference. The white witches, our ancestors, who were burnt by thousands all over Europe, were supposed to have made a pact with Lucifer, the Prince of Darkness. That sin was considered as essentially diabolical in its origin. The Bantu have no idea of Satan, and that aspect of witchcraft is entirely absent from their mind." I do not believe this distinction can bear examination. If anything, the theory and practice were more repre- hensible in the case of the Europeans than in the case of the Kafirs. M. Junod seems to me to fail to see that the indignation shown against witchcraft all the world over is due to a hatred of anti-social tendencies. The essence of our European satanic theory of witchcraft would seem to be quite in keeping with Kafir conceptions. The witch or wizard was supposed to make use of mysterious and uncanny forces. Europeans, no less than Kafirs, had to interpret the thing in terms of their own thought. In Europe the explanation of such a thing was naturally tinged and coloured by the overpowering religious concep- tions of the times. Yet the priests in mediaeval days worked magic in a dozen different ways, and were held in great respect and reverence on that very account. They were able — so the common people thought — to bless the arms of the military forces of the nation ; they were able to effect cures by means of relics ; they forgave sins and PRIMITIVE SOCIALISM 25 granted indulgences ; they controlled miracles ; blessed the crops ; stayed plagues ; and in a dozen different ways performed the most amazing feats that Kafir diviners also are thought to perform. But their actions were all regulated by authority, and were supposed to be used for the good of the State ; but the witches, who used very similar powers, were supposed to work for private, immoral, or anti-social ends, without submitting to the regulations of the authorities. They were therefore regarded as the enemies of mankind ; and, since any stick is good enough to beat a dog with, they were accused of working through evil agencies. Moral indignation takes on a different colour in difEerent races. The satanic theory of witchcraft not only arose as a natural explanation, but was also obviously suited to justify the treatment meted out to these poor wretches. But even in Europe there was a class between these two great types, for there were numbers of Thaumaturgic mystics whose practices were so neutral from a social or moral point of view that it was almost a toss-up whether they came to be regarded as social, neutral or anti-social in their tendency. One of tliese mystics might be made into a saint, another left unnoticed, and a third condemned by the authorities to be burnt to death. In the case of the Kafirs, the man who uses the forces of nature in a cunning way to the advantage of the tribe is regarded as a public benefactor, wliile the man who uses precisely similar forces for private and anti-social ends is regarded as an enemy to the tribe, and consequently unfit to live. Between these two there is a class that iLses similar practices for harmless and innocent purposes, and such people are left alone to go their own way unmolested but 26 KAFIR SOCIALISM unpraised. We shall never understand Kafir conceptions as to the odiousness and crime of using witchcraft or sorcery, and the beneficence of the users of magic, until we clearly grasp the essential fact that the use of magic, no less than the use of land, has been socialised. Legitimate and public-spirited use of magic makes a man a diviner ; the illegitimate and selfish private use of magic makes a man a sorcerer. {g) Religion. — It is but natural that religion in a primi- tive race should crystallise round the axis of the tribe. To change the metaphor, the conception of the tribe is the spine of the whole body of native thought. In the eyes of the Kafir there are few things more important than the maintenance of the religious customs of the tribe. There is no need to labour the fact that religion has sometimes been, if not a retrograde force, at least a cause of stagnation at certain epochs in the history of the world. The old enmity between science and religion may be given as an example. Yet ethnology, whatever light it may throw ultimately on the exclusive claims of certain religions, has undoubtedly helped us to appreciate the great benefits the world has received through religion. Even magic, which we had generally regarded as inimical to the good of society, has been shown by Dr. Westermarck (in the second volume of " Sociological Papers ") to have con- tributed in no small way to the amenities of life : by attach- ing great importance to a curse, it has strengthened filial obedience to parents ; it has encouraged charity to the poor ; it has upheld and intensified the claims of hospitality; it has broken down the selfishness of the savage about his food ; it has upheld the right of sanctuary for the oppressed. PRIMITIVE SOCIALISM 27 Thus, by appealing to reverence, awe and fear, it has restrained the grossest evils of savage life. And if magic has tended in the direction of civilisation, how much more must religion have done so ? Religion has restrained the turbulent impulses of the savage, and has given him ideals to live for. Mr. Jevons has pointed out, in his " Introduc- tion to the History of Religion," that it is quite possible we owe such things as the culture of wheat and other grains, as well as the domestication of the ox and the sheep, to totemism. His idea seems to be that when men felt a bond of sympathy with such things, they regarded them as totems, and sought to secure the growth of the grain by preserving the seed, and began to protect the sheep and oxen from undue struggle for existence. It is therefore quite possible that the man who rails at religion may owe the very bread he eats to the totemism of his ancestors. Were it not for primitive religion there would probably be no civilisation to-day. The religion of primitive races may not be lofty in a spiritual sense, but it is at least more effective in the direction of restraining the impulses of primitive peoples than is Christianity in curbing the vices of European races. It is hardly too much to say that a savage never knowingly disobeys his reUgious behef or conviction. Within the narrow area of its operations, the religion of a savage is intensely effective, and is something like a law of nature. The religion of the Kafirs is a blend of a decadent form of totemism, an elementary type of ancestor worship, and an all-pervading fetishism. No idols of any sort are worshipped ; while the belief in a Supreme Being, to say the least, is vague and uncertain. It is important to 28 KAFIR SOCIALISM remember that religion, in the case of a primitive people like the Kafirs, is mainly an affair — and a public affair — of the men, for the women play a very subordinate part in it. It is but natural for the people to think that when the chiefs and head-men die they still retain the interests in the tribe or clan that they ever showed during life. They therefore think that the amatongo, or spirits, of such people preside over the destinies of the clan and are in a large measure responsible for its fortunes. It is of the utmost importance that the tribe or clan should maintain an intimate relationship with such ancestral spirits. Religion is therefore socialised. The founder of the tribe is the one common ancestor who binds the members of the different clans in religious unity : while the deceased head-men of the different clans cement the family tie and strengthen the bond of consanguinity. Thus ancestral worship is a means of strengthening the tribal and family ties. To the European, the Kafirs seem singularly devoid of reverence in their worship of the ancestral spirits, for the meat-feast, which forms one of the chief ceremonies of their worship — " We pray by eating beef," said a Kafir to me once, " just as white men pray by using words " — is not the type of thing that we are accustomed to. Kafir religion, r.ke the religion of the Israelites in early times, does not seem to us to be an inward or subjective religion of the heart, for it is occupied rather with outward action than with inward motive and ideal. There is, however, a good deal more in the religion of the Kafir than meets the eye of the average European observer. A Kafir when on a PRIMITIVE SOCIALISM 29 journey, or when hunting game, or when entering on any important enterprise, prays inwardly to his itongo, or special ancestral spirit, and repeatedly expresses his religious emotions in ejaculatory prayer. Boys pray to the cord used in making bird-traps ; anoint it with medicine and beg it to catch birds nicely ; and having done this, they pray to the amatongo, whom they have heard their fathers address. When a man is offered beer, he will spill a few drops from the full pot on to the earth, saying, " Chiefs " — addressing his ancestral spirits as he offers the libation. He will also, when offered snuff, take a little pinch and drop it on the ground as an offering to the ancestral spirits. When he has received an unexpected boon, he will laugh, and will repeatedly thank his itongo. A dozen similar occasions occur on which a man shows that, though he may not be demonstrative in his emotions, his religion is yet very far from being devoid of heart. The man's religion is, it is true, largely confined to questions of clan-taboo, coupled with the desire to hold communion with his tribal ancestors. In their way, the people are all religious until civilisation undermines their customs, and they are influenced by their religious beliefs more than they are aware, and very much more than most missionaries imagine. Amongst the natives. Church and State are one and indivisible, and everybody is religious in one and the same way — new theologies, nonconformists, and blatant sceptics being unknown. All such things would be regarded as anti-social ; and proselytising Christian Kafirs are regarded as unpatriotic men who are willing to sacrifice the good of their tribe for personal whims and fancies. Kafirs think that missionaries inoculate the people by 30 KAFIR SOCIALISM means of medicines and potent charms, turn them silly, and persuade them to be sacrilegious to their tribal ancestors. It is sometimes thought to be a device of the white man to undermine the tribe. It is difficult to see how this can be helped since the Kafirs have socialised their religion. A native who breaks with the rehgion of his clan appears basely to fail in his fundamental duty to his fellows. {h) Finally, we must say that all such things as food, beer, private earnings, blacksmithing,* matrimony, &c., are more or less tribalised. When the people are eating food or drinking beer, any member of a clan or tribe who happens to be passing invites himself to the feast ; there is no need for him to wait until he is asked to join the party. But this only holds good for members of the tribe. Scattered about the country at the side of the pathways, there are frequently to be found small heaps of stones called isivivane, about which there has been very much specula- tion, into which we cannot enter in this place. When natives pass one of these heaps, they pick up a stone, or a twig, and throw it onto the isivivane. They do this, amongst other reasons, to ensure the finding of plenty of food along their journey. But it is noticeable that they only throw stones on to such heaps as are in their own territory. If a member of some rival tribe, travelling through the country, were to throw a stone on to the heap, he would almost certainly be noticed by many sharp eyes that are for ever watching ; and at the first kraal he stopped at, he would be told in unmistakable language that there was no food for him in that district. * This art is rapidly disappearing under the influence of our trade. PRIMITIVE SOCIALISxM 31 In ancient days when white men wanted labour, they would sometimes go to a chief, who would order a number of his men to go and work for the white man ; and the chief would take as much of the earnings of these men as he wished, for all that his men earned was so much tribal property, and therefore at the disposal of the chief. Coupled with all this, the people have a clear sense of the responsibility of the corporate body for the deeds done by the individuals of the tribe. We shall return to this subject later on. In surrendering their " rights," they may seem to us to pay heavily for this privilege, but in their own eyes they think they drive a very good bargain, as they are thus freed from half the responsibilities and fears of life. It will be clear now that the tribe is a liighly socialised community, being what the Greeks would call ttoXi's avrapxrjs, that is to say, a self-sufficed State without any imports. It is complete in itself, and the essence of its government is group-association. The tribe, and in some measure the clan, may be regarded as an organism ; for it is a sort of enlarged individual, and has a solidarity that is almost absolute. It is a closed society into wliich the young men are introduced by a special rite when they come of age ; and when any man in any way fails to perform his obliga- tions, he finds that his privileges vanish. Thus when a man becomes a Christian, he practically cuts himself adrift from his clan, and has to shift for himself as best he may. If he is a good-natured fellow, his lot is not made unpleasant, for the natives value and respect good-nature very highly, f The Clan-System of the Kafirs is of great value because it is the seed-plot in which the altruistic sentiment develops 32 KAFIR SOCIALISM It is most striking to notice how there is much less selfish- ness and much more camaraderie amongst the " heathen " Kafirs than amongst the ruck of the " Christian " converts. The Clan-System simply could not exist without a strong sense of the brotherhood of the members of the tribe ; and it might be well for European Socialists to bear this fact in mind. No system of collectivism that is imposed from without upon a selfish, licence-loving people can hope to succeed. To be successful it must be the spontaneous outcome of strong altruistic feeling. Until Europeans can base the structure of their society on a sense of obligations to be performed, rather than on rights to be received, they must remain unfitted for Socialism, and could, at the best, but make the " have nots " change places with the " haves," It is not a little surprising that those who are fighting the Socialists in Europe do not pursue the policy of explaining to the masses that the socialistic state they are asked to help to set up, so far from being a question of extra skittles and beer, will demand the utmost self-sacrifice of fierce individual interests, and mil entail almost undreamt-of obligations and restraints on every man. No doubt all self-respecting and intelligent Socialists * recognise this fact ; but it has not at all penetrated the intelligence of the average working man, who fondly dreams of a sort of bourgeois suburban New Jerusalem, where those who are * The popular outcry against Socialists, based on trumped-up accusa- tions of irreligion and immorality, is most deplorable. Though in no sense a Sociahst, I feel bound to protest against the shameful tactics of those who quote sentences from socialistic writers, while concealing the bearing of the context. At the worst, Socialists are visionary and impractical people who think too well of human nature, and who imagine that all men are as altruistic and pubUc-spirited as they are themselves. No great crime this ! PRIMITIVE SOCIALISM 33 at present poor are going to be enriched at the expease of those who are now wealthy. Militant Socialism depends for much of its popularity in the gallery on the ignorant assumption of the man who preaches at the street corner that Socialism will mean all privileges and no obligations. No wonder those who have nothing to lose, and who think they may have much to gain without working for it, are tempted to join the cry ; for in the general scramble that they think will follow a social upheaval, they hope to get something for nothing. Were it made clear to the working man that he will have to ignore most of his individual " rights " that he is now clamouring for, and will have to accept, whole-heartedly, his obligations to society, he would either accept the fact and set to work to discipline his nature, or else he would have nothing more to do with Socialism. And if Socialism should win the day, the tactics suggested above would be found to have been of great value, for the people would thus have developed their altruistic spirit and minimised the evils that are in- separably connected with every human scheme. Whether or_jiQt_JEe— can hope- the_^vfirage_BriioiLJiO- rise to the undoubtedly high level of the despised African savage in this respect is open to doubt. - Passing on from the organisation of the clan we must consider the advantages of the Clan-System. II. Advantages of the Clan-System (1) The system has certainly satisfied the bulk of the people, and that is no small achievement. Amongst the raw Kafirs one practically never finds people who are for Q 34 KAFIR SOCIALISM ever discontented with, and looking out for causes of complaint against, their rulers. There is no such absurd thing as a Party system, and consequently nobody plays fast and loose with the interests of the tribe. No one ever dreams of asking for the franchise, or for popular control, until white men put the ideas into the heads of the few ill-educated Kafirs, who are naturally hostile to the entire Clan-System and to the chiefs. The system has made the people surprisingly unselfish in the way they sacrifice their own private gain and private ideas for the good of the State. Passive Resisters would be regarded as the most selfish and callous of individualists, and no one dreams of breaking a law so as to attract attention to a grievance. It is only the educated Kafirs who become aggressively selfish, who find their obligations irksome, who press their own ideas, and who foment discontent. If any device that we may have wit enough to introduce will make the bulk of the people even half so contented with the state of affairs, we shall indeed be fortunate. (2) The system has led to a general and uniform state of medium prosperity, for on the tribal system of land- tenure poverty is virtually impossible. A system that absolutely prevents the formation of a class of paupers has indeed points in its favour. We cannot hope to intro- duce any plan of individualism which will not inevitably produce a vast amount of poverty, and squalor, and suffering amongst the natives. (3) The effect of the system has been that the people rise, if they rise at all, en masse ; therefore the clash of various types, all at different stages of culture, is impossible. There is no w^r between capital and labour, nor yet any PRIMITIVE SOCIALISM 35 class of people that regards another as composed of blood- suckers. This universal social harmony is of no small advantage to the people. (4) There has been no trouble whatever as to taxation. Since, until they are brought into contact with civilisation, the people have no money, they can only be taxed in kind : the chief is supported by the fines inflicted for criminal offences ; he can also requisition labour according to his needs ; and he receives large " dowries " from the men who seek to marry his daughters. Thus the people readily and willingly pay their way ; they support their chiefs, and even glory in the self-sacrifice this entails. I have seen the young Swazi warriors, who would scorn the idea of doing anything so feminine as to hoe in the gardens or fetch wood, do both these things for their king. All the young bloods turned out in regiments and showed the highest delight in doing this work, which was changed from a shame into a glory just because the gardens belonged to the king and not to themselves. (5) The natives are very frequently satisfied with the decision of the head-man or petty chief ; and if they are dissatisfied with that, they are certain to be content to welcome, and abide by, the decision of their chief, whose judgment is the end of all strife. It is scarcely an exaggera- tion to say that in olden days the man who lost his case was as contented with the chief's verdict as was the man who won it : the chief had spoken, and that was the end of all controversy. It need scarcely be said that our administration of justice can never appear to the Kafir as satisfactory, but must serve as an endless cause of discontent. 36 KAFIR SOCIALISM (6) The system produced a most valuable method of inculcating the spirit of unselfishness and camaraderie. It is almost impossible to over-estimate how valuable such a thing is amongst primitive peoples where a fierce egoism walks naked and unashamed. This spirit of good- fellowship is very evident to one when travelling with a large number of native carriers. I have often been struck at the extraordinary kindness these simple children of the veld showed to one another even under the most trying conditions. After a long day's march in the tropics, men who have carried a 60 lb. load on their head for thirty miles will run the last mile or two of the day's tramp, put down their loads at the camping-ground, and race back to carry the load of some native who happened to be tired. Numbers of similar instances of a spirit of unselfishness could be mentioned. (7) The system has served the most invaluable of all functions, namely, that of constraining, controlling, and curbing the appetites and passions of the natives. The system has provided what must be regarded as an immensely strong clan-conscience, and it is this function that, above all others, shows us that the system is no mean mode of civilisation. Clan-custom and clan-taboo perform in primitive peoples what religion does, or tries to do, in more advanced nations. Kafir religion may have ethical force in many directions, yet not infrequently the natives make their religious conceptions the excuse for a gross sensualism of which they feel at times not a little ashamed. When wishing to argue with the white man about the undue gratification of some appetite, a man will say : "If Umhulunhulu (The Great One) gave me this appetite, it is PRIMITIVE SOCIALISM 37 not my affair but his if I indulge it excessively." While the native might argue thus about some semi-bestial private action, he would not, even though he knew he could not possibly be observed, entertain even for a moment the thought of doing some comparatively innocent thing that was condemned by tribal custom as being anti-social, A clan-taboo acts as an immensely strong categorical imperative, except where contact with civilisation has weakened the Clan-System. Instead of every man playing for his own hand, the members of the clan have clubbed together to seek the interest and to advance the prosperity of the social group. The most fundamental of all the appetites, and the one most frequently put into operation, is the desire for food. Now we have seen that instead of each man keeping all the food he can for his own consumption, it is one of the first duties in the clan to let all others share in the food that is being eaten. Few things are thought more base than to refuse to share food with others. To eat in secret is a most base and vile action in the eyes of the Kafir. Another important department of life the Clan-System took in hand was the regulation of the intercourse of the sexes ; and until Europeans broke up the Clan-System this restraint was wonderfully effective within certain limits. Unblushing abuses we tolerate in Piccadilly or Regent Street could never exist under Kafir rule. All who understand the intensely strong sexual instincts of the raw Kafir— and in this matter the Kafir would make Boccaccio, and possibly Apuleius, blush— will see of what infinite value the Clan-System was in curbing this most violent and turbulent of all Kafir impulses. And amongst 38 KAFIR SOCIALISM the worst vices fostered by contact with the white man, the two most pernicious and unlovely are the indulgence in gluttony and greediness in connection with food, and the loss of restraint, and the lack of regulation, of the sexual instincts and impulses. Civilisation pays heavily for the latter, for practically all the outrages on white women are committed by Kafirs who have been for some time in contact with civilisation and out of the reach of clan-control. I have known single white women to live for years all unprotected amongst hordes of raw Kafirs — one American lady lived actually in the kraals — and yet I have never heard of an authentic case of any attempted outrage committed in such cases by the natives. The fear of such lonely white women is that they may suffer at the hands, not of the Kafirs, but of low-typed white men who may be tramping through the country. (8) The tribal system has been the one thing that has prevented a universal rising of the natives ; for, coupled with friendship within the tribe, there exists the intensest jealoiisy of one tribe towards another. However much we may condenm this narrow-minded hostility, we must admit that it h£is worked most admirably in our favour. Had the tribes combined in early days, the white man would have had insuperable difiiculty in gaining a foothold in the country ; and it is only in so far as we have undermined the Clan- System that it is possible for natives to combine against us. * * * * * When we weigh up these excellent features of the Clan- System, and then think of the way our philanthropists have pressed upon these people the strange and tangled civilisation of the Western world, with all its sordid PRIMITIVE SOCIALISM 39 accompaniments, we can but pause and say to our- selves : I often wonder what the Vintners buy One half so precious as the goods they sell. Before forming a definite opinion on this point, let us pass on to consider the other side of the story, noting the disadvantages of the Clan-System. III. The Defects of the Clan-System There are, it would appear, but two serious accusations that can be brought against the Clan-System. The first is that under it the people are too much at the mercy of their chief. To Europeans, who most conveniently ignore the ruthless tyranny of majorities in a democratic country, this possibility of abuse of power seems a very terrible thing. The Zulu chief Tshaka is a notable instance of such a tyrant. Yet it must be clearly understood that the people very rarely complain of the way their chiefs use their power. There are so many subtle ways of bringing a chief to book that as a rule the man is careful not to offend his people. After looking all round the question, I feel fairly certain that this theoretical abuse of power is not so common as is imagined. There is certainly no doubt that the natives would rather be under their chiefs than be ruled by, let us say, the Committee of the Aborigines Protection Society or an English Radical Goverrmient. Yet for all that, in weighing up the advantages and dis- advantages of the Clan-System, we must remember the fact that some chiefs abuse their power. The second accusation seems to be a very much more 40 KAFIR SOCIALISM serious one. It is often said, with not a little truth, that in a Kafir kraal there is not only no incentive but no room for individual initiative. The consequence of this is that the entire tribe reaches — for it aims at — a low, dull level of mediocrity, in which no one is behind or in front of the mass. The result of this unprogressive state of af!airs is seen in the facts that the Kafirs to-day cling to the customs of their ancestors, build the same type of rude hut, use the same primitive implements and methods of agriculture and warfare, and have borrowed little or nothing from the civilisation of the white man. It is therefore thought that the Clan-System is inherently opposed to the whole spirit of progress, and that the chiefs are, as a rule, the bitterest of all opponents to the missionary and school teacher. The Clan-System seems to enshrine a conservatism that is nearly absolute : all innovations are regarded with sus- picion, simply because they are innovations ; the status of woman will apparently remain low so long as the system continues ; polygamy will vanish slowly, if at all ; the belief in witchcraft will never die out, and many poor wretches will continue to suffer from this cause ; the lobola custom, in virtue of which a man receives a number of cattle when he gives his daughters in marriage, will probably remain the woman's one defence and safeguard — and it is not a noble one, though it is surprisingly effective. Such is the second accusation that is brought against the Clan-System. Before we try to weigh up the advantages and disadvantages of the system we must glance at the means by which it has been broken up. PRIMITIVE SOCIALISM 41 IV. The Disintegration of the Clan-System It is not infrequently stated in the Home Press, and also in books on South Africa, that we are not destroying the Clan-System, but are conserving everything that is good in it. For example, in a recent book on the native problem we find these words at the close of a two-page description of the Clan-System : " Such then, briefly, was the tribal system, which has been modified and moulded into the forms thereof in existence at the present time in British South Africa. . . . So we see that all that was excellent in the original forms of native government was to remain, embodied in British rule and necessarily under British protection." It might as well be maintained that after having cut out several square yards from different parts of a balloon we had not destroyed its efficacy. The Clan-System depends for its success upon its completeness, and the removal of essential elements destroys the value of the organisation. We have undermined the Clan-System right and left, and have riddled its defences through and through with the explosive shells of civilisation ; we have removed nearly all the old re- straints which curbed the people, and have disintegrated their religion, and so rendered it, comparatively speaking, useless. It is not to be wondered at that the various tribes are in chaotic and confused condition, ready to listen to any nonsense the Ethiopians choose to put before them. The savage under real self-government is in no sense the same thing as the savage with his customs and government broken up by the presence of white men in the country. 42 KAFIR SOCIALISM With the Clan-System have gone, or are going, some of the best traits in Kafir character. We have set up an absurd legal fiction in virtue of which some white official is pompously called the Paramount Chief of some native tribe, and we insist that the natives shall salute this person with the forms and ceremonies used to the real Paramount Chief. The natives are so very courteous by nature that they readily show all the signs of outward respect we demand from them, but when our backs are turned they laugh and ask what these inconse- quent white men will want next.* The white man, how- ever, looks at this ridiculous silk tassel that he has fastened on to the ruined balloon, and asks us to believe that the emasculated system of patchwork we have left behind is the Clan-System. It may be well to point out how we broke up the Clan- System, looking at this matter of course from a native point of view. We started by undermining the power of the chief, and in striking a blow at him we struck a death- blow at the very heart of the system, for it is in him that all the main girders of the structure are centred. First of all we took away the chief's power of making war against rival clans, and thus dishonoured or insulted him in the eyes of his people. Having done that we set up white magistrates, who took the law out of the chief's hands and refused to allow him to exercise the power of life and death. We then gave him a subsidy, payable only on condition of good behaviour, and thus made it less necessary for the * It is interesting to note that this fact has been recorded by Mr. Bryant in his excellent Zulu dictionary, which work is evidently unknown at the Colonial Office, for the new Constitution of the Transvaal keeps up the fiction in all seriousness. PRIMITIVE SOCIALISM 43 people to support their chief ; and since people lose interest in what they cease to pay for, the people lost some interest in their chief. Then we deposed one chief and put up another, and departed from native conceptions of hereditary right ; as a consequence it sometimes happened that there were two Popes within the clan, each hurling the Kafir equivalents of Bulls and anathemas at one another. Then we finally pretended that a white man was the Paramount Chief. Thus we discredited the chieftainship. It must be remembered that we are not yet discussing the question as to whether we were wise or not in doing these things, but are merely showing that as a matter of fact we have undermined the system. Having effectively broken the power of the chief, we set to work to break up, in many districts, the tribal system of land-tenure. We did this largely in the interest of our- selves and of the few natives who welcomed our civilising influences. Sometimes also we did this with the definite intention of inserting the thin end of the wedge so as to break up the Clan-System. In some districts, as, for example, in Swaziland, large tracts of land were sold by chiefs for a mere nothing as concessions to Europeans ; and it is quite possible that the chiefs did not realise what they were doing until it was too late, for the Kafirs generally say that the chief has no right to alienate land from the tribe. As soon as Europeans began to press in upon lands hitherto held by the natives, every conceivable kind of modification had to be made as to land-tenure. White men needed labour, and so natives came to live on farms, in towns, and on Mission Stations. Native reserves were formed in which land was held by communal tenure. In 44 KAFIR SOCIALISM some parts of the country, as in most parts of Bcchuana- land, Zululand and Basutoland, the land was retained ahnost wholly for the natives. In other parts, as, for example, in the Transkeian terri- tories, a larger proportion of white men held land, and villages or small towns were laid out in some districts. In Natal much land became vested in the Native Trust ; while in other parts Kafirs owned land individually, having either bought it from white men or (in Cape Colony) having been granted plots in return for services rendered to the State. Natives began to squat on farms, on Mission Stations, or on unoccupied Crown lands, and in certain districts they were allowed to settle on private farms on condition of putting in a certain amount of work in lieu of paying rent. Native syndicates, as in Natal, sprung up, and began to buy up land which had hitherto been the property of the white man. Mr. Rhodes conceived the Glen Grey Act, which is too well known to need description, and which was, confessedly, introduced so as to break down the power of the chief and the corporate spirit of the clan, which were thought to be inimical to progress. At our mines we have had to deal with the natives as best we could, with the result that these men, after being under our control, return to the kraals and feel disinclined to submit to the restraints of the clan, which they begin to feel irksome. Missionaries, of course, directly aimed their blows at the system ; and every convert, by the very action of professing Christianity, is cut adrift from the clan-life, and yet remains in the country with, at best, divided allegiance to his former chief. PRIMITIVE SOCIALISM 45 We next interfered by stopping some of the grosser tribal customs. It was almost necessary for us to do this, but it is to be doubted whether we quite understood the inner meaning and outer effect of some of the customs we put a stop to : the effect of our interference, however, is not subject to doubt. Finally, we brought about the dawn of economic in- dividualism. We gave the Kafirs an example — that most potent kind of lesson — of a new kind of liberty, which some of them, naturally, thought excellent. The natives began to be reluctant to part with individual gains. We taught them the value of thrift and of personal property ; we created new wants and urged the natives to labour for us in return for wages — which, of course, was an entirely new thing to them, for in olden days they only worked so as to provide for their actual needs. Traders persuaded the natives to bring them skins, or grain, or wool, or other produce ; and so we introduced a new economic era. Previously there had been but little division of labour, and no production of commodities. The people did not distinguish between use-values and exchange -values, but under our tuition they began to see the value of growing things, not for purposes of consumption, but for utility of exchange. We taught them the use of money. We thus brought in the era of economic individualism, and, since a Kafir loses self-control when plunged into an entirely new environment, we sapped the very foundation of the spirit that had hitherto constituted the motive-power in clan- life. If by these means we have not utterly undermined the entire structure of the Clan-System, it is difficult to see what we have done, 46 KAFIR SOCIALISM V. The Results of our Policy The advantages and disadvantages of breaking up the Clan-System are so interwoven that it is difficult to differentiate and assess them accurately, and he is a clever accountant who can draw out a balance-sheet. I heard the other day of two clerks who, on the way to town in the train, were discussing the question of Free Trade and Colonial Preference. Said one superficial gentleman : " Oh, it did not take me two minutes to make up my mind : I decided at once for Free Trade." There are hundreds of people in South Africa who decide the great question as to the relative benefits of the Clan-System and the native franchise with a similar amount of thought. It is frequently said that we gained considerably by breaking up the Clan-System, for, by undermining the power of the chief just sufficiently to make it difficult for him to fight, and yet not sufficiently to break down tribal jealousies, we avoided a number of little petty wars. It is very doubtful whether our action did not have exactly the opposite effect ; but be that as it may, we quite forgot that our policy, by breaking down tribal jealousies, might possibly lead to an ultimate and united native rising worse than fifty small local wars. It certainly looks as if we had now squandered all our initial advantages, and were beginning to feel the more awkward consequences of our hasty action. The scales seem to be turning against us now, and we are reaping the fruit of our half-considered action. Our past action may be likened to a policy that was adopted in the early days in Australia. It is said that PRIMITIVE SOCIALISM 47 during a bad drought in Queensland the farmers cut down a certain bush which they thought absorbed too much water. When they had destroyed an immense amount of the shrub, they found that it was a preserver of water, and that sheep could live on it in times of drought. In their panic, they had destroyed their best asset. The story may be apocryphal, but it is, none the less, an excellent illustration. The Cape, in granting a native franchise, may have destroyed much of its water-preserving bush ; but we need not, in our desire for symmetry, set to work to cut down by panic legislation all the rest of the bush throughout South Africa. But the question before us is not whether ive gained by our action, for there were obviously certain initial advantages in our policy ; what we need to find out is whether or not our action was for the good of the natives. The Kafirs certainly reaped some advantages from our action. The main advantage has been that by limiting the power of the chiefs and by stopping inter-tribal wars, we have made life and property more secure, and have abolished, at least theoretically, death by torture in the case of people found guilty of using ^vitchcraft. In talking with old Kafirs, I have invariably found that it is this that has struck them as the one beneficial result of our rule — though they have always been quick to add that they would rather go back to the old regime, with all its disadvantages, than continue as at present. The second advantage is that we have rendered progress possible, while under the Clan-System stagnation was the rule. It must be admitted that there is a great amount of truth in this contention, 48 KAFIR SOCIALISM though it is extremely difficult to avoid all the fallacies that lie in wait for us when arguing thus. On the other hand, there is but little doubt that progress has been one-sided, superficial, and far too rapid. The civilised Kafirs carry too much sail for their very scanty ballast. We have entirely failed to get the bulk of native opinion on our side, and have made no serious attempt to utilise the immense force of custom. If we had but given them time, the Kafirs would have invented their own restraints suitable to their changed condition. It has been pointed out above that we have broken down the religious and clan -restraints of the people ; it must now be added that we have provided no adequate substitutes. To ask a Kafir to accept the restraint of a precept in the Sermon on the Mount is as unpractical as to ask a Member of Parliament, or the German Emperor, to do the same thing in Party, or International, politics. It may be said that we have sought to restrain the people through their fears. That shows how we fail to understand how little a Kafir fears our punishments compared with the consequences of breaking a clan-taboo. We may flog a Kafir, but such an action demeans the white man who gives it more than it disgraces the Kafir who receives it. I speak of course from the native point of view. The one point on which we can touch them is their cattle, and a substantial fine in that direction has more effect than half a dozen floggings, for the men soon forget their pains, but never cease to regret the loss of their beloved oxen.* * For outrages on white women it may be, and I think is, necessary to flog the natives : in such cases it is generally a half-civilised Kafir who is guilty, and he needs sonjewjiat different tres^tujent from that suited to the raw native, PRIMITIVE SOCIALISM 49 No doubt we thought that we should be able to provide restraints as effective as those we removed. We forgot the Kafir proverb which says that the well ahead is not to be depended on. We fully intended to substitute strong restraints ; but having forsaken the well behind us, we found but dry country ahead. A chain is no stronger than its weakest link, and our weakening of certain links of the Clan-System has spoilt the efficacy of the whole chain. The worst elements of our civilisation are being absorbed by the youth of the Kafir tribes. The young men, on returning to their kraals from the goldfields, or Mission Stations, or towns, refuse to submit to the old clan-restraints, and decline to obey the orders of their betters, for they have lost their sense of reverence — a thing almost unheard of in olden times. The young men become lax and lawless, and are a serious peril to all order and decency in the kraal. This spurious liberty and impu- dent swagger are very contagious, and even the children become infected. In olden days, for example, only men of mature age were allowed to drink beer and to smoke Indian hemp. Quite small boys do both these things nowadays, and the old people are powerless to prevent them. Sexual irregularities, which were only allowed between young men and their betrothed lovers in ancient days, are now practised freely even by children. Excesses of this nature were rendered very rare in olden days, because all the girls of the kraal were examined by a court of old women before and after great dances. The girls now refuse to submit to these examinations, and threaten to go and complain to the white magistrate if they are examined against their wish. The old men know quite well that the D 50 KAFIR SOCIALISM magistrates know but little of native custom, and tliat they will look at this matter with European and hostile eyes ; so they are powerless to compel obedience from the children. It is hopeless— so the Kafir thinks— to obtain anything but opposition from the white magistrate, who is filled full with his ideas of the rights of the individual. Even the missionary cannot provide suitable restraints. Here and there a few Kafirs grasp the essential spirit of Christianity, and in such cases the new restraints are effective. But the average Church member is but little influenced, with regard to his fierce sexual impulses, by Christian ideals. It is no wonder that the old men sigh for the good old days with all their drawbacks. As bearing out the above remarks, it may be pointed out that the Rev. F. Roach, giving evidence before the Native Commission upon the native view of British methods of government, said : " The heathen Zulu, I think, compares it unfavourably with his own form of government, before the war. I have had impressions on that point from native head-men themselves, who are heathen, old heathen Izunduna or head-men, and they say : ' No, we prefer the old system.' They say that in these days Indab itengiwe (bribery) is practised ; that evil-doers occasionally get ofi scot-free ; and that children and young fellows get entirely out of hand, because the magistrate's courts uphold them very often in cases of disputes between them- selves and their parents. In these three ways they say the government of the present time is inferior to their old system of government. I do not put that as my own opinion ; that is the expression I have got from the natives." I entirely agree with this evidence, and have PRIMITIVE SOCIALISM 51 heard the same thing from natives in many other districts. The Kafirs certainly are an unprogressive race. Of that there is no doubt. They have developed no art, the rude attempts of the children to model in clay not being indulged in, as a rule, after puberty ; they have developed no architecture, for Zimbabye, if indeed it be of Kafir origin, cannot be regarded as anything but primitive ; they have developed no poetry, their attempts in this direction being chiefly limited to absurd and fulsome praise of their chiefs or of themselves ; they have developed no writing — not even knowing the use of pictographs or ideograms * — taking over this art but very slowly from the white man ; they have developed no form of money or of currency ; they have developed no music, not aspiring to anything better than to play the most monotonous jingles on rude instruments ; they have developed no national unity, being split up into rival clans and tribes ; they have developed no lofty religion, being satisfied with a crude and but slightly ethical ancestor worship, combined with a modified form of totemism and a belief in magic and fetishism ; they have developed no philosophy, accepting the crudest hedonism, and giving up the problem of exist- ence as not worth seriously troubling about ; they have developed no lofty ideals of any sort, being frankly content with abundance of cattle, beer, and women. With regard to the alleged necessarily unprogressive nature of the Clan-System, I would point out that there * It is stated that the Malayan races have developed no less than nine alphabets — a striking contrast to the Kafirs, and one that shows how impossible it is to use the Malay States ae an analogy. 52 KAFIR SOCIALISM are probably several factors that have led to the unprogres- sive condition of the Kafirs. We observe some symptom that arises from half a dozen causes, and are so occupied with one cause that we ignore the rest. All Kafirs have brown-black eyes, but he will be mistaken who puts that fact forward as the cause of the stagnation in Kafir society. Building the huts in circles and using wattle and mud as materials are not parts of the Clan-System ; they result from the fact that such materials are ready to hand, and that building in circles leads to simplicity of construction, for angles are difficult things for builders to negotiate. It is extremely difficult to persuade the ordinary Kaffi: to plant and take care of fruit-trees, or to make any agricul- tural improvements. That does not seem to be due to the Clan-System, but to the fact that the people have only to scratch the ground to get all the food they require. The use of the plough is becoming more general, and thousands of raw Kafirs — in spite of the Clan-System — are adopting the implement even when living far away from white men. We might take all the points enumerated above, and could show that it is at least doubtful whether they resulted from the Clan-System, though they were concomitant with it. The way chiefs become envious of men who grow rich, and the devices they adopt to get them " smelt out " and " eaten up," are not essential parts of the Clan-System, for such things occur under individualistic forms of government. Those who propose the entire destruction of the tribal-system make much capital out of the fact that when trouble between whites and blacks comes to a head, the chief is found to be at the head of the movement. Of course he is. We might as well propose to abolish Crown PRIMITIVE SOCIALISM 53 and Parliament because they are found, when European wars break out, to be involved in the declaration of war. It seems to be held by opponents to the Clan-System that the cliiefs are going to remain for ever selfish, oppressive, and opposed to progress. It is forgotten what an immense change has come about in this respect during the last thirty years. Chief after cliief is coming to realise that there are advantages in education ; and the old hostility to progres is beginning to vanish — I think a little too quickly. There seem to be several causes, other than the Clan- System, to account for the lack of progress. There is, for example, the intrinsic nature of the race. Even when freed from the Clan-System, the educated natives show almost no initiative ; they start no manufactures, but borrow everything from the white man ; they seem in- capable of steady progress without constant supervision ; the moment this supervision is removed, the men relapse into squalor and indolence. If all this happens when the man is freed from his clan, it is difficult to see how the evil complained of can be due to the clan — unless it is the after-effect of a vicious system. Again, there is the belief in witchcraft, which throws its shadow over the entire life of the people. What is the good of adopting new methods of agriculture, and so growing rich, if it is but to lead to a charge of using sorcery ? The relation of witchcraft to the Clan-System is not by any means simple. It may be the belief in magic, and not the socialistic ideas of the people, that is the trouble in this matter. But, yet again, possibly it is the fact that rich men become anti-social that drives the people to hunt round for some accusation to justify them in curbing such a tendency ; 54 KAFIR SOCIALISM thus, it may be, after all, the Socialism of the people, and not their belief in magic, that is really at the bottom of this open sore. The subject can be looked at from two different points of view, and I rather doubt whether any white man can hope fully to understand the matter. Again, there is the improvidence of the people which obviously leads to stagnation ; and there is also sheer ignorance as to how to improve land, to say nothing of the natural dislike of innovations of all kinds, a trait that is found everywhere even amongst Englishmen. None of these points that have just been mentioned seem to be organic 'portions of the Clan-System, which, purged of its defects, might yet become progressive. One thing seems quite clear, and it is that there is room for great advance under the Clan-System. If we take the Indian village communities, we see how progressive primitive Socialism can be. " The constitution of these communities varies in different parts of India. In those of the simplest form, the land is tilled in common, and the produce divided amongst the members. At the same time, spinning and weaving are carried on in each family as sub- sidiary industries. Side by side with the masses thus occupied with one and the same work, we find the ' chief inhabitant,' who is judge, police, and tax-gatherer in one ; the book-keeper who keeps the accounts of the tillage and registers everything relating thereto ; another official, who prosecutes criminals, protects strangers travelling through, and escorts them to the next village ; the boundary- man, who guards the boundaries against neighbouring communities ; the water overseer, who distributes the water from the common tanks for irrigation ; the Bramin, PRIMITIVE SOCIALISM 55 who conducts the religious services ; the schoolmaster, who on the sand teaches the children reading and writing." * It is after examining such a system that Maine has said : " Nobody is at liberty to attack several property, and to say at the same time that he values civilisation." f If he had said " Western," or " Rapid " civilisation, the sentence would hold good. The Kafirs have a very long way to go before they become as civilised as the people living in these Indian village communities ; and as far as one can see, if we had retained the Clan-System in its fulness, we might have led the Kafirs on along the path of civilisation as far as they are ever likely to reach with safety. No civilised Kafirs have advanced to the level of such Indian village communities : in fact they are yet far behind the stage of culture reached in India. The question of the relative values of different systems of land-tenure has been left purposely for the close of our chapter on Primitive Socialism ; and to it we must now turn. The question of land-tenure, as the recent Native Com- mission states, " dominates and pervades every other question," and is " the bed-rock of the natives' present economic position." It certainly has the most intimate connection with the tribal system. The natives cannot be said to make good use of their land, which, coupled with the genial climate, easily affords the people all they require. It is interesting to note that in the manifesto of the Fabian Society we find it stated that : " The practice of entrusting the land of the nation to private persons in the hope that * Karl Marx, " Capital," p. 351. t " Village Communities," p. 230. 56 KAFIR SOCIALISM they will make the best of it has been discredited by the consistency with which they have made the worst of it." * Whatever may be the truth or exaggeration of such an accusation with regard to England, the statement could not be made with regard to South Africa with even the vaguest semblance of truthfulness. It is very difficult to say for certain whether the agricul- tural progress observable wherever individual tenure holds in South Africa is due to the system of tenure adopted or to some collateral factor. It is quite common for people to point to the Glen Grey experiment as a proof of the value of individual tenure ; yet it is permissible for one who regards the experiment as, on the whole, a great success to point out that there are some peculiar conditions which make it difficult to be sure we are tracing the right cause when we place the success to the credit of individualism. Up to the present it has been possible to select suitable natives for the experiment. Only natives keen to own land and develop it have been selected. When the system becomes universal, this great advantage of selecting suitable Kafirs will vanish. At present no native who believes that crops can only be increased by magical charms applies for land. Thus the commonest cause for indolence is not operative. There is no reason why such a belief should be wedded to any special system of land-tenure. We can no more argue from the success of the Glen Grey Act to the advisability of destroy- ing the system of tribal land-tenure, than we can argue from the success of some land scheme in which selected white men are sent, let us say, to the Orange River Colony, to the wisdom of shipping all our home indolent out-of- * Tract No. 2. PRIMITIVE SOCIALISM 57 works wholesale into the Transvaal. Selection is the secret of success in both schemes. The unfit are weeded out before the experiment is begun ; but it is the unfit that will cause trouble when the scheme becomes adopted universally. Not a little of the success of the Glen Grey Act has also arisen from the caution, the slowness, the restrictions, and the excellent wisdom with which the scheme has been worked. We could scarcely hope to do so well with a gigantic plan. It is not only the wisdom of a scheme, but it is also the way it is applied and administered, that determines its success or failure amongst the Kafirs. A bad scheme applied with tact will often work amongst primitive people better than a perfect scheme stupidly administered. Our danger is in being premature and in doing excellent things in the wrong way. In thinking of the benefits of the Glen Grey Act, we are apt to forget that when individual tenure is the rule rather than the exception, there will be considerable progress in suitable cases and appalling failure in bad cases. Poverty will probably increase yari passu with the increasing adoption of the plan, and there will also be a great increase of selfishness which will undermine one of the best features in the character of the raw Kafir. Aristotle has censured the community of property as tending to repress industry, and as doing away with the spirit of benevolence ; but amongst the Kafirs, whatever may be the result with regard to industry, it is individualism and not collectivism that saps the spirit of benevolence. The raw socialistic Kafir appears to be a philanthropist when compared to the individualistic educated native. 58 KAFIR SOCIALISM It is very difficult to say what will happen when all the natives enjoy individual tenure ; some people think that this change will lead to the Kafirs forgetting their other grievances, for they will be so engrossed — so it is argued — with their interests in the land that they will not have time to listen to agitators. And certainly any one who has become intimate with the Kafirs knows that it is as useless to expect to get a Kafir to think about his other duties, when he has to see to his sowing, or ploughing, or reaping, as it is to get a decent day's work out of an Italian youth when he falls in love. The man becomes obsessed with his one interest. But for all, that there would seem to be another possibility, and a rather grave one. It is just as likely that having once tasted the sweets of owning land, the natives will get greedy for more land ; and their land- hunger may make them cast eyes more envious than ever on the districts occupied by white men. It is fairly certain that in introducing individual land- tenure we shall make as many difficulties as we shall remove ; for the change will act like the shaking of a dice-box, and there are sure to be unlooked-for results. It is quite possible that we might gain all the advantages derived from the Glen Grey Act by a different system, which would at the same time conserve what is good in native character. I have seen natives living under the Clan-System and communal land-tenure roused to considerable energy by a sensible missionary who introduced to them new kinds of vegetables, and then took the trouble — a thing very few seem to care to do — to see the experiment tided over the initial difficulties. Whatever may be done finally, it is to be hoped that PRIMITIVE SOCIALISM 59 arrangements will at least be made so that those natives who prefer to live on land held by communal tenure may be free to do so. Any enactment should be permissive and not obligatory. It has been urged that owing to the nature of the land in the native reserves it is not practicable to institute individual holdings. It is possible that some Crown lands may be available ; but there is another possibility which seems to be less reactionary, less risky, and more suited to the people. The land might be broken up so that the natives held it by family or group tenure. If that were done, and if the family owned land in perpetuity, all improve- ments would be kept as family assets. Such a system might appeal to natives who do not wish for individual tenure ; for the plan is in keeping with the genius of the people. The natives in Natal show considerable desire to own land by syndicate — that is, by group-association. Difierences as to the value people attach to Socialism may after all resolve themselves in the last analysis into temperamental differences of outlook upon life. Does a man's life consist in the abundance of the things which he possesses, or in his sharing all things with others, and in possessing his soul in contentedness and peace ? Of course in one sense it consists in neither of these alternatives, for " We live by Admiration, Hope and Love." But when we have these, what next ? Shall we find life in the feverish quest of possessions and contrivances, in the enjoyment of luxury and rapid motion, or, on the other hand, shall we find it in the " Simple produce of the common day," and in " Joy in widest commonalty spread " ? The reply to that question will depend upon the temperament of the 60 KAFIR SOCIALISM man who answers. In the West, progress, action, luxury — though they can only be reached through strife, competition and a divine discontent — are the ideals most men cherish : in the East, men prefer placid contemplation, quiet enjoy- ment and the simple social life. William Morris may sigh for a paradise in which energy and the quest of beauty are combined with self-sacrifice and a spirit of human fellowship. He would take what appeals to him as highest and best in the West and root the flower in what is highest and best in the East. And well has he called his vision " News from Nowhere," for after all, East is East and West is West And never the twain shall meet. In England we have long since passed through the socialistic stage, and to go back to it would probably mean regression to semi-barbarism. In spite of the proverbial kindness of the poor to one another, we have too little altruism to ensure the success of collectivism. In our present state of culture we shall get much of the good and none of the evil Socialism would give us, through group-association and a system of co-operative enterprise designed so as to give ample room for individual energy, ambition, and initiative. Amongst the Kafirs the institu- tion of individualism might no doubt lead to certain types of progress ; but the people are in a stage of development in which, I think, they will gain more from a Socialism they are accustomed to than from an individualism suited to a highly developed people. They have so much altruism that it seems almost a crime to break down their own system, and with it to destroy the finest qualities of the savage. Communism has been the breath of their life PRIMITIVE SOCIALISM 61 for ages, and they regard the simple life as the best. Shall we, because our nerves are tingling with the desire to hustle everybody on, take these backward people and put them through a process that may possibly lead to some progress, but which must lead also to much sufiering and peril ? If the Kafirs prefer to lie down in the shade, cannot we leave them alone and go our own hot, bustling way ? I think that we should do better rather to return to the Clan-System and to Kafir modes of thought than to plunge the native races of South Africa into the vortex of our democratic and industrial life. However, if, as seems probable, we decide to push individualism, we should be more than ever anxious to develop all the various sides of the native's character so that he may be prepared for his new life under the changed conditions. White men, whether engaged in industrial or missionary work, must not merely develop one or two sides of the Kafir's nature, but must draw out aU his capacities so that he may survive the flood we let loose in the land. When missionaries pay less attention to the apex, and more attention to the base, of the native's character, they will find more stability and intelligence in their converts. And the same thing is true of those who are anxious to gather the Kafirs into our industrial system. My own view of the matter is that politicians act for Party ends without due forethought, and that there is but little hope that they will mend their ways in this special matter. It looks therefore as if Kafir SociaHsm were, unfortunately, doomed : but I feel it to be of the very utmost importance that we should retard rather than hasten the process. It is late, but not too late, to conserve many of the finest 62 KAFIR SOCIALISM traits in Kafir character : therefore we should not break up the Clan-System in any district more than we are absolutely bound to do, but should conserve it wherever we can. When the people have outgrown the system, it will drop off of itself. We pass on to trace the effect of socialistic ideals on the Conception of Justice. CHAPTER II KAFIK CONCEPTIONS OF JUSTICE There is an unmapped region that is bounded in one direction by legal duty, in a second by moral obligation, in a third by social usage, and in a fourth by instinct or habit. It is a sort of no-man's-land, for it is beyond the frontier lines of jurisprudence, sociology, ethics and biology. Since racial custom is so intimately interwoven with conceptions of what is right and fitting, ethnologists have recently annexed this hinterland of the four sciences enumerated ; and it is already evident that a study of this region will prove of great interest and importance to all who would rule or civilise the backward races of mankind. If we would help such people to rise out of their backward condition, we must cease to take it for granted that a course of action that is approved of by our highly specialised sense of justice must necessarily appear obviously right and fitting to primitive races. The most superficial observer is forced to notice certain individual physical differences as well as certain broad resemblances in the different races of mankind : but it often escapes his observation that there are also mental and moral differences that in 'some directions outweigh the resem- blances. This failure to recognise deep-seated differences is largely due to our insularity of nature, which is apt to shut us off from intimate association with the races we govern. 64 KAFIR SOCIALISM It is strangely difficult to explain convincingly to people who have never come into close contact with backward or primitive races, how widely Europeans and Kafirs differ in their conceptions of justice. It not only calls for much sympathy, but it also takes time for the mind to accustom itself to the atmosphere of primitive thought. It is extremely difficult for a white man to " think black." The man in the street little realises how slowly his own ideas on morals and legal rights have become crystallised into their existing shapes and forms, and how profoundly his conceptions of justice have been affected by custom and social usages. It is not every one who has the oppor- tunity to study the misty region — that " vanishing-point of jurisprudence " — where, as Holland says, " law and morality are not conceived as distinct." The average Briton is apt to grow impatient at the mere mention of the fact that human beings differ in their con- ceptions as to what is just and unjust. " Don't tell me," he is apt to say impatiently, " that there is a single sane human being who does not in his heart of hearts know what is just or unjust : we want none of your theoretical subtle- ties : just give the Kafir straightforward British justice and see if he will not recognise it at first sight." " The Hebrew prophet," writes Jowett, " believed that faith in God was enough to enable him to govern the world ; the Greek philosopher imagined that contemplation of the good would make a legislator. There is as much to be filled up in the one case as in the other." The Briton imagines that the administration of his own ideas of justice will usher in the millennium. It seems to be the peculiar right of an Englishman to constitute his own conception of fair KAFIR CONCEPTIONS OF JUSTICE 65 play as a sort of Platonic archetype of Eternal Justice. He seems to be constitutionally incapable of believing that his conception of justice is not necessarily universal. He regards his sense of justice as a sort of noumenon^ orthing- in-itself, that is independent of time and space : he thinks he comes to his conclusions as to what is just or unjust by means of fixed and infallible " intuitions " that must be shared by all other rational beings. He solves the native problem at a stroke, so he thinks, when he urges us to give the Kafirs simple justice and have done with it. The British are proud of many things : they are proud of their Empire, of their Navy, of their commercial activities, of their free institutions ; but there is nothing they are so proud of as their impartial administration of justice to all the races they govern. There may be individual Britons who rail at the Empire, who would reduce the Navy, who condemn our industrial and commercial life, who find fault with our Party system ; but there is scarcely a Briton who does not profoundly beheve that it is pretty well the whole duty of man to administer British justice to all the subjects of the King. The love of justice is the god of our idolatry ; and it is the one thing in which we take refuge when we feel ourselves libelled by some other envious nation as to our territory-grabbing propensities. Our imagination is so dull that we feel something of a shock when so sane and level-headed a man as Jowett says (in his " Plato's Republic ") : " There may come a time when the saying, 'Have I not a right to do what I will with my own ? ' may appear to be a barbarous {sic) relic of individuahsm. Such reflections appear wild and visionary E 66 KAFIR SOCIALISM to the eye of the practical statesman, but they are fairly within the range of possibility to the philosopher." Our historic memory is so short-lived that we forget that the " infallible intuitions " of our great grandfathers are poles asunder from our own intuitions on such a subject as the justice of burning human beings for using witchcraft ; yet it was, comparatively speaking, but yesterday that many European nations considered the justice of that action as beyond question, and appealed triumphantly, as the Kafirs do to-day, to their " intuitions " as being decisive. Nay, we need not go so far back : many things that seemed to us essentially just when we were children appear to us in a very different light forty years later, and we pause and pick our steps carefully where once we would have stepped out boldly. The pain with which we part from the old judgments of childhood might give us pause, if not sym- pathy, with a backward race that often stands aghast at our twentieth-century conceptions of what is just. " The business of the jurist," says Holland, " is, in the first place, to accept as an undoubted fact the existence of moral principles in the world, differing in many particulars in different nations and in different epochs : and, in the second place, to observe the sort of sanction by which these principles are made effective." There are, of course, certain broad resemblances, especially in abstract questions, between Kafir and European ideas of what is just, and no one wishes to deny the fact. The Kafir, for example, will admit that it is unjust to punish a man who is ad- mittedly guiltless. But once we leave abstract questions and come to practical details, we are faced with endless difficulties in the most unexpected quarters. For example. KAFIR CONCEPTIONS OF JUSTICE 67 Is it just to punish a man for theft ? Is it just to punish a man for breaking a contract ? Is a child responsible for the debt of his deceased father ? Just as an Irishman and an Englishman may differ as to the justice of cattle- driving, just as a Conservative and a Socialist may differ as to the justice of punishing a starving man for stealing bread, so may Kafir and European differ on the questions just asked. The Kafir sees nothing wrong in stealing from a rival tribe, or in leaving, without giving any notice, his European employer who has entered into a contract with him. In some of the above cases, therefore, the European has the loftier ethical conception, but in others, as, for example, the duty of a son to pay his deceased father's debts, the Kafir surpasses him. The soft and welcome excuses that the European might honestly advance with regard to such obligations would be indignantly scouted by the savage. We may imagine, then, how surprised the Kafirs are to find us looking to them for gratitude when, in a bungling fashion, we feel it our duty to correct what we imagine to be their wrong-headed conceptions. It is pathetic to see how chagrined a European magistrate sometimes is when he has gone out of his way to give the Kafir what he considers the inestimable boon of substan- tial British justice, only to see the Kafir leaving the court in a grumbling and discontented spirit. The mistake of the Briton consists in his imagining that human nature is all of a piece, and that even as in all races men are agreed as to the intellectual judgment that twice two make four, so they must be agreed as to moral and emotional judgments. If justice be defined in Justinian's words as the " constant G8 KAFIR SOCIALISM and perpetual will to render to each one his right," then differences in thought as to a man's " right," will lead to concrete differences in human judgments as to what is just. Professor Westermarck, in his " Origin and Develop- ment of the Moral Ideas," * has pointed out that the emotional constitution (perhaps he should have said emotional judgment) of man does not present the same uniformity as does the human intellect. It would be interesting to pause at this point and to see whether this dissimilarity in emotional judgment be due to constitu- tional differences, or merely to variations in the data on which the emotional nature works. Leaving on one side this somewhat academic problem, let us pass under review a few of the more important points in which Kafirs differ from Europeans as to conceptions of justice, and as to emotional judgments. (1) It is custom and precedent, rather than considera- tions of abstract fairness, that are considered by the Kafirs in their system of jurisprudence. This arises partly out of their veneration for old men and worship of Ancestral Spirits ; partly from a tendency in human nature in virtue of which that which is forbidden by authority comes, in process of time, to be felt intrinsically wrong ; and partly because " in the vague and floating order of primitive societies the mere definition of a right immensely increases its strength." | Professor Drummond's description of the way in which the natives in Central Africa form a pathway across country is an excellent illustration of the way in which laws are * Vol. i. p. 11. f Maine, " Village Communities," p. 150. KAFIR CONCEPTIONS OF JUSTICE 69 formed in primitive societies.* He tells us how the natives, clad in a little palm oil and a few mosquitoes, avoid stones, ant-heaps, or small bushes, and thereby form their tortnous pathway. One man goes a little bit out of the way because of some obstacle, and the dozen men following him walk -^ in his erratic footsteps, so that the path maintains in the main the desired direction while incessantly wriggling to left and to right. Even so in the case of savages, the people are conscious of a vague direction in which it is best to go. Some individual meets with a difficulty, and the chief is called in to solve the doubt. The path gets twisted a little to one side. This detour becomes estab- lished when, lo, another obstacle is met. Resort is again had to the chief, with the result that the path is again deflected. Little by little customs and precedents get established. In opposition to this idea it is sometimes said by theorists that the idea of a custom must precede that of a judicial sentence : but it seems certain that in primitive races it is the judgment of the chief that generally inaugurates a new custom. Maine has expressed this by saying that " the only authoritative statement of right and wrong, in the infancy of mankind, is a judicial sentence after the facts, not one presupposing a law that has been violated, "f The Kafir chief who gives a verdict, within certain limits, makes an action right or wrong in the eyes of the natives ; and, consequently, precedents are all-important in their system of law. To controvert, or even to doubt, the justice of the decisions of a dead chief is tantamount to contemptuous behaviour towards the itongo or spirit of that * See also Holland, " Jurisprudence," p. 54. f Maine, " Ancient Law," pp. 4, 5, 7. 70 KAFIR SOCIALISM ancestor : it is the last thing that the Kafir would dream of doing ; and should he reverse the chief's decision by inadvertence, and subsequently discover the fact, he would be prepared to expect untold calamity to the tribe as a most natural consequence of angering the Ancestral Spirits. In many instances the Kafirs are honestly confused as to the rightness or wrongness of certain actions : they go to their chief with their ideas nebulous, or at least held in solution. As the case proceeds their difficulties get cleared up and their judgments crystallise out into a definite shape, so that new habits of thought are formed. Each party is glad to get his ideas clarified, and though we could not exactly say with Maine that the " person aggrieved com- plains, not of an individual wrong, but of the disturbance of the order of the entire little society," * yet this socialistic aspect of the case is certainly present in the sub-conscious mind of the Kafir. The important point is that the chief has spoken and resolved the doubt. Every one now thinks he knows what is right. With each act of obedience the new course of conduct becomes easier and confirmed. Just as a bodily habit, by the mere repetition of certain nerve impulses, forms a pathway in the cells of the brain, thus making the action easier and more natural, so does a custom, which is but a public habit, make a pathway in the brain of the body politic. Men tacitly assume that what they have always done is the thing they ought to do. The custom has no sooner become a habit than it comes to be regarded as an obvious rule of conduct : " Custom," as Bacon has said, " is the principal magistrate of man's life." * Maine, " Village Communities," p. 68. KAFIR CONCEPTIONS OF JUSTICE 71 We are apt to take it for granted that all other nations must desire the progress we are bent upon ourselves. " In spite of overwhelming evidence, it is most difficult for a citizen of Western Europe to bring thoroughly home to himself the truth that the civilisation which surrounds him is a rare exception in the history of the world. The tone of thought common among us, all our hopes, fears and speculations, would be materially affected if we had vividly before us the relation of the progressive races to the totality of human life. It is indisputable that much the greatest part of mankind has never shown a particle of desire that its civil institutions should be improved since the moment when external completeness was first given to them by their embodiment in some permanent record. . . . Instead of civilisation expanding the law, the law has limited the civilisation. . . . The stationary condition of the human race is the rule, the progressive the exception." * Though the Kafir has no permanent record, yet his memory is a very good substitute. I have seen a Kafir chief dis- cussing with a number of aged councillors a precedent made eighty years previously by one of his ancestors. After two or three minutes' discussion the whole case was revived to the satisfaction of all the councillors — so excel- lent is the memory of the Kafir, and so reliable is tradition in such cases. When these facts are borne in mind it causes us no surprise to find that the Kafir is a confirmed Conservative : . the fact that his grandfathers did a certain thing, or held a certain opinion, is sufficient to recommend it to him and to caase him to reject new ideas. He neither wants to have * Maine, " Ancient Law," pp. 27, 28. 72 KAFIR SOCIALISM the equal and placid flow of his life interrupted by the intrusion of new conceptions, nor does he wish to have his system of law improved, for it quite satisfies him. When some European magistrate rules according to Western ideas, giving the people British justice, and consequently upsetting all Kafir precedents, there must of necessity be a feeling of discontent in the hearts of the natives. They are bewildered at the pace we insist on, and leave the white magistrate's court with glum faces, for they are incapable of seeing rhyme or reason in the white man's view of the case. It frequently happens that the more the white magistrate thinks that he is just, and the more (where a native and a white man are opposed) he strains the law in favour of the Kafir, the more unjust does the Kafir think him. European reformers and philanthropists may talk to the raw Kafir till doomsday, but they will not change his opinion on this point : the native will either be silent and refuse to waste his breath, or else he will say : " We are going along different roads ; your path goes in that direc- tion and mine in this. Let us each go our own way." Speaking of Kafir jurisprudence, Mr. Dugmore, who had excellent opportunities of studying the subject before the Kafirs had been much brought into contact with white men, wrote : "It would be scarcely correct to speak of a system of Kafir law. The laws of the Kafir tribes are but a collection of 'precedents, consisting of the decisions of the chiefs and councillors of bygone days, and embodied in the recollections, personal or traditional, of the people of the existing generation. That these decisions, in the first instance, were founded upon some general notion of right is not unlikely. It is not, however, to the abstract merits KAFIR CONCEPTIONS OF JUSTICE 73 of a case that the appeal is now ordinarily made, in legal discussions, but to what has been customary in past times. The decisions of deceased chiefs of note are the guide for the living in similar circumstances. The justice of those decisions is usually assumed as a matter of course, no one presuming to suppose that an Amaxosa chief, any more than an English khig, can do ' wrong.' " * (2) We are prepared now to see that the Kafir does not regard justice as an abstract thing in the way we do in Europe : to him it is essentially a personal thing, and he cannot abide our Western idea of cold, impersonal, and abstract justice. He likes it to be hot, personal, and con- crete. It is the chief alone who can give it to him, for justice is a thing that scarcely exists apart from the chief who creates it. As English children beheve — or used to beheve, in the good old days — in the necessary justness of all that their fathers do, and consider such decisions to be necessarily final, even so the Kafir, before he is educated, has a passionate faith in the essential Tightness of the deci- sion of his chief. It never occurs to him to question the word of his chief, for the verdict instantly inhibits all other action of his judgment. The man does not want abstract justice, but the personal opinion of his chief : and the last thing a Kafir would like to do would be to call in a white man to examine, and possibly to reverse, the decision of his chief, even when such decision had been given against him. The Kafir distrusts our entire machinery of ad- ministering justice, and he cannot for the life of him conceive that the white man is in any way justified in * " A Compendium of Kafir Laws and Customs," MacLean,' pp. 33,34. 74 KAFIR SOCIALISM forcing natives to bring their cases to white magistrates. He cannot admit that it is just that a white man should come in uninvited and set up his new-fangled authority. He admits that the white man is the very person to decide what constitutes justice for the European, but will never admit that he is capable of deciding what is right for black men. The home sentimentalist is ever saying : "All will come well if you will but give the Kafir what you know to be just." The Kafir says, however, that this is the one thing in the world he does not want, and will not have if he can help it. Can the decision of a usurper make things right or wrong ? Is not the very action of the white man in presuming to administer justice an act of injustice ? And how can any decision of such an unjust tribunal be anything but discredited in advance ? That is the Kafir's natural thought when first the white man sets up his court. Under the influence of time and education, the natives are here and there becoming somewhat reconciled to our rule ; but there is still an immense amount of underlying discontent with our administration of justice, which, I hasten to add, is clean and irreproachable from the European standpoint. The thought of the Kafir should be familiar to us, for are we not accustomed to the argument of the extreme Socialist who defends the starving man when he steals bread, and condemns the judge who punishes the theft ? To the rabid Socialist, our entire economic system is a cruel tyranny and a gigantic injustice ; and the law is nothing but a device of the men who steal the labour of the poor to render secure their unlawfully gotten gains. These men, so the argument runs, rob the poor of their means of getting bread ; and the starving man — or it may be the poacher — KAFIR CONCEPTIONS OF JUSTICE 75 simply takes back what really is his own, but which has been previously stolen from him by the rich. The landlord is supposed to have wrested the land from the poor in a most iniquitous and unrighteous fashion : he then makes and administers the law of the land, which is all in his own interests. Therefore the decision of a magistrate, who is ex hi/pothesi the official of this iniquitous conspiracy, is dis- credited in advance,whenever a question relating to property comes before him. If we accept this point of view and these data, we cannot for a moment be surprised at the judgment of the Socialist. The starving man has but appealed from legalised tyranny to essential justice, and has but taken that to which he has a perfect right. We may deplore this way of looking at the matter, and may be certain that it is wrong, but that need not prevent us from understanding the position taken up by such an extreme Socialist. In a somewhat similar way the Kafir looks upon the white magistrate as the administrator of a wholly indefensible system. In the eyes of the Kafir the selection of the man who is to administer justice is all-important. (3) Perhaps the very central conception of Kafir law — a conception in intimate correlation with the whole idea at the base of the Clan-System — is that of collective, or corporate, responsibility. It is a conception most admir- ably suited to a race that is in a backward condition, for it is a great deterrent from crime in all immature societies. It is also a conception that could be used by us to reduce our difficulties to a minimum. A striking example of a successful use of the imagination in making laws for subject races is seen in what is known as the Spoor Law. It is true that it was not an original 76 KAFIR SOCIALISM Kafir conception, but it is in keeping with Kafir ideas. The law came into force early in the nineteenth century, when the natives in the eastern territories were incessantly stealing the cattle of the white settlers. It was found to be useless to try to convict the thieves, or to regain the cattle, for no native would ever tell against another native in such a case. In 1817 Lord Charles Somerset suggested to Gaika that when the spoor of stolen cattle could be traced to within a few hundred yards of a kraal, the white men should give over the pursuit, and should tell the people of that kraal to pay up the stolen cattle or else point out the spoor leading away to another kraal.* Any kraal that obliterated the spoor so as to hide the thief became, ipso facto, responsible for the theft. The natives raised no objection to the plan, for it was a brilliant piece of imagina- tive legislation, as it appealed to the conception of collec- tive responsibility. Never, until quite recently, have the Kafirs accused us of injustice in insisting on this rule. It is significant to notice who it is that raises the objection. It is the educated Kafij, who has renounced his connection with his clan, who has lost, through our teaching, his sense of solidarity with his fellows, who shirks his obligations, who demands his rights, and who has become an intensely self-centred individualist. From time to time senti- mentalists in England have described this law as tyrannical and unjust, for it does not look like British justice. But it has worked with extraordinary smoothness and success ; it has found a congenial soil in Kafir thought and senti- * IVIr. Theal says : " This is the ordinary Kafir law, which makes a community responsible for the acts of the individuals composing it." — " History of South Africa," vol. 1795-1834, p. 200. KAFIR CONCEPTIONS OF JUSTICE 77 ment ; and is now often regarded by the Kafirs as one of their own laws. When we reflect that, in our own evolution of legal institutions, we have slowly and with great difficulty passed, during the last thousand years, from semi-primitive conceptions of law through such systems as Legal Fictions, and Equity, to Legislation, we see that we might well be patient with the people that we found but yesterday in a more primitive state than we ourselves were in a thousand years ago. But no ; we would fain force the natives into our highly developed Conception of Contract, and in the course of a single generation or two would rush them through all the stages of a legal development that has taken us more than a thousand years to accomplish. We press on them the Canons of Conduct that suit some advanced European State in the midst of complicated world-politics ; and when a luckless Kafir of the veld, who does not clearly understand his share in some trans- action he has entered into, fails to fulfil his part, we call him bad names ; and should the native happen to be a Mission boy we cry out in horror at his hypocrisy. We take a man out of his condition of Status and plunge him head- long into the most advanced conditions of Contract, and then abuse him if, through defective imaginative apprehen- sion, he fails to take the same view as we do of the obliga- tions he has undertaken in ignorance of the full meaning of his action. As Maine would say, the Kafirs " do not possess the faculty of forming a judgment on their own interests : in other words, they are wanting in the first essential of an engagement by Contract."* Is it a cause for wonder that * " Ancient Law," p. 173. 78 KAFIR SOCIALISM a miner or a storekeeper in the Colonies, ignorant of the slow development of law, should feel that he has all the right on his side when he condemns a native for breach of engagement ? " Ancient law knows next to nothing of individuals, it is concerned not with individuals but with families, not with single human beings but with groups. Even when the law of the State has succeeded in penetrating the small circles of kindred into which it had originally no means of penetrating, the view it takes of individuals is curiously different from that taken by jurisprudence in its maturest stage. The life of each citizen is not regarded as limited by birth and death ; it is but a continuation of the existence of its forefathers, and it will be prolonged in the existence of his descendants." * Our profound belief in the individual and the Kafirs' equally profound belief in the community tinge all our several thoughts, both in the administration of justice and in. political life. The Kafirs carry their idea of group-association to such an extent that they regard a debt as a family concern. A man's debts succeed to his nearest relations. We take the Kafir out of this group-system to which he is accustomed, and then wonder that the man does not consider it dishonest to run into debt and die without paying it. We cannot have it both ways : if we elect to insist on importing our own changes into Kafir society, we must be prepared to be more intelli- gent than to blame the native who but dimly grasps the significance of the enormous change we make in his condi- tion. A curious result of our haste is seen in the case of the native convert. A Christian Kafir is, as we have seen, cut of? from his clan by the very fact of his change of religion : * Maine, " Ancient Law," p. 270. KAFIR CONCEPTIONS OF JUSTICE 79 he retains, however, his natural habit of incurring debt, while his children, who have been brought up outside the clan, do not see the fun of paying the debts he leaves at death, for their sense of corporate union with others has been destroyed by the missionary's teaching of individual responsibihty. I can imagine some objector still persisting in saying that all this is mere theory, and entirely remote from daily practice. I will therefore point out a case in which our conflicting views of justice led directly to a serious war which the Kafirs still regard as the most unjust one the white man has ever waged against the black — though the British were entirely justified from their point of view. I refer to what is known as the War of the Axe. In 1846 a Kafir named Kleintje was caught steahng an axe, and was sent to be tried by a magistrate at Grahamstown. He was handcuffed to a Hottentot offender, and was accompanied by four armed Hottentots who were sent with them as a guard. On the road the guard was surprised by members of Kleintje's clan, who seized two of the guns. One of the Hottentot guards, seeing a companion beneath a Kafir, fired at the native and killed him on the spot. The man who was slain happened to be Kleintje's brother. The guards escaped in safety, while the Kafirs murdered the Hottentot to whom KUeintje was manacled. Now Kleintje*s crime had been committed on colonial ground, and the murdered Hottentot was a British subject ; the matter therefore could not be overlooked. The British demanded the surrender of the rescued prisoner as well as the murderer of the Hottentot. The head-man dechned to give him up, though he sent back the guns. The chief of the clan was then appealed to, but he refused to deliver them up, explain- ing that in his view of the case the death of the Hottentot 80 KAFIR SOCIALISM was compensated by the death of Kleintje's brother ; he added that if the governor was grieving for the Hottentot he himself was grieving for his own man. Sandile, with whose people the criminals were known to be, was then called on to surrender the two men, but acted in the same manner as the others.* I think that in this case the natives were not bluffing ; they were truthfully stating the case as it appeared to them. They believe in the justice of retaUation against people outside their clan, and think that in a case like this blood washes out blood. Justice, they think, is corporate rather than individualistic. A member of the clan was killed, and the matter could never be levelled up till a member belonging to the other party was killed. As a result of this clashing of conceptions of justice, a long and tedious war ensued. So far, then, from these considerations as to differences in the conception of justice being academic, they are intensely practical, and a failure to understand them has led, and I fear will lead again, to widespread bloodshed in South Africa. (4) With regard to the subject of individual liberty, the Kafirs, on account of their socialistic tendencies, differ widely from us, and, " barbarians " though they be, do not think " a man may do what he likes with his own." They are not obsessed with the European idea of personal liberty, but believe strongly that individuals belong to the chief, and that they are his property. They find their self-realisation in their constituted head, for the tribe comes to self-consciousness in the person of the chief. * The above account is condensed from Theal's " History of South Africa," vol. 1834-1854, pp. 258-260. ""=— ""^ KAFIR CONCEPTIONS OF JUSTICE 81 Offences are divided into two classes, criminal and civil : an offence against the person is a " case of blood," and is criminal, because an injury to a person is an injury done to the chief's property, and is a loss not so much to the person hurt as to the chief, to whom the fine is paid. The tribe cannot afford to have its fighting power weakened, and therefore any damage done to an able-bodied person is a damage done to the fighting power of the tribe, and therefore to the chief, who is regarded by the people as the embodiment of the tribe. All offences committed against private property are civil cases, and are regarded as of a less serious nature than those committed against the chief's property. We may feel that a man who has had his leg broken by another should have the right to claim personal damages ; but the Kafir thinks that it is the chief who suffers loss ; for the injured man is the chief's property. That a fine, paid by a native, should go, not to his chief or clan, but to an alien Government, is well-nigh inconceivable injustice in the eyes of a Kafir. There was quoted in the previous chapter the statement of a Zulu with regard to the chief's right to forbid people to eat the produce of their own gardens until the Feast of First Fruits. The passage was quoted to illustrate the native's conception of the relation of the individual to the chief. It also throws much light on the Kafir's conception of justice, and gives proof, if that were needed, how useless it is to think that British justice with regard to the rights of the individual can appeal to the Kafirs. (5) According to Kafir law a man is guilty until he proves he is innocent ; the plaintiff therefore feels aggrieved when 82 KAFIR SOCIALISM he comes into our courts and finds the onus of proof shifted on to his own shoulders. " This is a strange thing ! " thinks the injured Kafir in school-boy fashion. " That rascal of the dirty Jama clan has not only taken three of my oxen which he has got all snug in his own cattle-kraal, but here I come to the white man of the law for redress, and he actually takes the side of that scoundrel of a fellow, and tells me — me ! the man who is grieving for his s olen cattle ! — that it is I, forsooth, who must prove this fellow guilty ; though there are the cattle actually in the cattle- kraal of that thief, and anybody with eyes in his head can see the fact for himself ! " It need not surprise us that the Kafirs take this point of view, for it is a principle well known in Europe. But there are special reasons why this custom should be found amongst the Kafirs. It is very difficult to procure evidence to incriminate a man ; the people are too clannish to give evidence voluntarily against one another, unless it be for the common good of the tribe. There is no judicial oath required of witnesses, who may, however, volunteer an oath if they wish ; in such cases the evidence gains in value ; but no one can be subpoenaed to give evidence : there is thus no offence of perjury, and no compulsion to appear as a witness. Under such conditions it is but natural that a man should be considered guilty until he proves his inno- cence, for it is extremely difficult for the prosecution to make out a case. (6) Kafir conceptions about responsibility often seem very humorous to Europeans. A Kafir lends a knife or a hoe to a friend who injures himself while using the imple- ment ; the injured man will argue that if his friend had KAFIR CONCEPTIONS OF JUSTICE 83 never lent him the article in question there could have been no injury done : the responsibility for the damage is therefore said to rest with the man who lent the instrument.* In such matters the Kafirs are very like European children. They sometimes make the most unexpected demands of this nature, and the decisions of the magistrate may seem obviously right to us and yet obviously wrong to the Kafirs. Mr. Carl Jeppe, in his book on the Transvaal, has given an example of this sort of difl&culty which he met with in his ofl&cial life ; he does not seem to appreciate the point of view of the Kafir, but seems to regard such a demand as something utterly inconsequent and absurd. It is evidently very difficult for a European to divest himself, even for a moment, of his European cast of thought. Here is another Kafir conception that is somewhat akin to the previous one. When a Kafir is on a journey and receives hospitality for the night at some hut he is passing, he leaves his possessions on the floor of the hut and troubles no more about them until he is leaving. He holds the host responsible for taking care of such property while h^ is under his roof; and a Kafir court of law in olden days would certainly have maintained the man's case. (7) With regard to the question of theft, it may be pointed out that it is not an offence to steal from people of a hostile or rival tribe. All tribes are, in primitive races, at least potential, if not actual, enemies of one another. Europeans still rob from their enemies during war, and justify the * Such a case is not very far removed from some unexpected side- results of recent legislation in England with regard to the liability of employers of labour. 84 KAFIR SOCIALISM action. The Kafirs rob from their rivals in times of peace, and advance similar arguments. In olden days, to punish a Zulu for robbing or injuring a Pondo or a Basuto would have appeared absurd to all parties. Is it thus that a man's meritorious action, in advancing the interests of his own clan by spoiling the Egyptians, is rewarded ? A man who is injured by a person of another tribe is, in the eyes of the Kafirs, entirely right in taking his revenge on any member of that rival tribe. If a Zulu had an ox stolen by a Tonga, he would feel it essentially just — so strong is the sense of corporate responsibility — that he should recoup himself by taking an ox from any Tonga that came in his way. There is no one who has any judicial power to interfere in such inter-tribal affairs. There is no such thing as inter- national or inter-tribal law among the Kafirs, and so force is the prime and final arbiter in all such quarrels. The individual who has suffered loss at the hands of a member of a rival tribe must either overlook the insult and loss or resort to retaliation. The Kafirs believe more than we do in the intrinsic justice of retaliation. In this they are like the English school-boy, but they show a sweet reason- ableness, as has already been pointed out. It is only in certain offences that they may take the law into their own hands. Theoretically a man has no right to judge his own case and to take redress, but in certain cases custom allows him to do so. The question as to retaliation is left in some directions undefined, and it has worked well to trust the uncommon good sense of the people in this matter. (8) With regard to the question of punishment, the Kafirs display a very characteristic mildness in ordinary cases, KAFIR CONCEPTIONS OF JUSTICE 85 and a corresponding severity in other cases. If a man should have his cattle stolen, there is no idea in his head of punishing the thief ; all he wants is to get his cattle back, and to be allowed to be left unmolested. Should the cattle be returned without any trouble, then recourse is not had to the chief. All that the aggrieved man seeks, and all that Kafir law gives him, is redress when the cattle cannot be discovered. The theft is not punished. The natives do not as a rule recognise any one's right to administer corporal punishment, for such a procedure would appear to them indecorous and undignified. There are, however, the inevitable exceptions. When boys are being initiated into manhood, they are subjected to an extremely severe course of thrashing ; and in olden days it was not uncommon for boys to die under such treat- ment. A father, also, sometimes administers corporal punishment to his son ; he very rarely nags at his boy, but leaves him alone to his own good sense : but should the boy do anything worthy of thrashing, the father administers it with a vigour and fury that are simply astonishing. There are certain occasions in which a Kafir will beat a man. In this he is like an English school-boy smarting under the injury done to him by another boy. The imme- diate personal chastisement of the offending boy is the only form of redress that will satisfy this temporary little Shy- lock. The Kafir may sometimes find his heart seething with fury, and may deal with his opponent in this school- boy fashion so as to get rid of the perilous stuff from off his chest : in five minutes' time he will be as calm as the placidest cow. 86 KAFIR SOCIALISM Professor Westermarck has said that punishment in all its forms is essentially an expression of indignation in the society which inflicts it.* If that is so, the Kafirs must be a people signally deficient in moral feeling. If we contrast with their procedure the severity of punishment which obtained in England during the early part of the nineteenth century, we shall be forced to admit that we are a very indignant people. " When, in 1837, the punishment of death was removed from about 200 crimes, it was still left applicable to exactly the same offences as were capital at the end of the thirteenth century. Pocket-picking was punishable with death until the year 1808 ; horse-stealing, cattle -stealing, sheep-stealing, stealing from a dwelling- house and forgery, until 1832 ; letter-stealing and sacrilege, until 1835 ; rape, until 1841 ; robbery with violence, arson of dwelling-houses and sodomy, until 1861." f Such a list would simply shock the mind of a Kafir, who would regard us as monsters of cruelty for such needless severity. There is only one type of offence for which a Kafir inflicts a very heavy punishment : any kind of action that he regards as anti-social, he punishes in the extremest fashion. There is, of course, a reason for this, for such an action weakens the tribe and must be prevented in self- defence. It shocks the European to find that the one ofience which is punished by a death of torture is such a seemingly harmless thing as the use of witchcraft. Mis- sionaries are apt to describe some punishment for such an offence, and then to add, " The dark places of the earth are full of the habitations of cruelty," altogether forgetting the * " Origin of the Moral Ideas," vol. i. p. 169. t Ibid. p. 188. KAFIR CONCEPTIONS OF JUSTICE 87 severity of punishment meted out in Europe. It is too little understood by people who condemn the Kafirs for such severity that the crime of witchcraft is thought to sap the very foundation of social life. The Kafir therefore shows his utter indignation at such base proceedings by inflicting the severest penalty he can devise. It is only fair to own that the cruelty in such cases which so shocks our sentiment is the expression of their hatred of the criminal selfishness they are punishing, and is therefore due to injured moral feeling. Distorted thought, it may show, but not callous cruelty. (9) When the methods employed to ascertain the truth and to test accusations are concerned, the matter becomes more complicated. To the Kafir, trial by ordeal, whether by poison or any other similar method, seems absolutely just and infallible — much more so than a trial by a white magistrate could ever be. When the Kafirs come into our courts, they find themselves lost in what is to them a maze of forms and ceremonies, which they do not understand, and which are ahen to their whole type of thought. They find their own ideals and customs overridden rough-shod. Furthermore, the white man is so easily duped by sly Kafirs that it is very difficult for him to sift false evidence from true. A native chief, just because he is a Kafir, can see through the imposture in a moment. The result of all this is that the Kafirs go back to their kraals and say that " The white man does not go by the truth," and that " Lies go down better and pay better than truth." The next time they have to give evidence, the temptation to tell deliberate untruths is very great. But an ordeal instituted by the native diviner is infallible in all cases. " There is no 88 KAFIR SOCIALISM shuffling, there the action lies in his true nature." It is astonishing to the European who sees through the tricks of some of these diviners to note how even the man accused of witchcraft comes finally to admit the entire justice of his own punishment. For example, here is a sick person who is supposed to be the subject of secret bewitchment by some enemy. A doctor declares the illness is caused by a lizard which some witch or wizard has placed in the patient's stomach. The diviner hides a lizard about his person, and then, after impressing the audience as to the charms he is working, by mere sleight of hand produces the lizard out of the patient's mouth. Every one is so impressed by the production of the lizard that there is not a grain of doubt left in any mind. Then follows the smelling out — generally performed by another type of doctor — of the witch or wizard. The man finally settled on as the culprit is amazed at the accusation, but cannot gainsay the evidence. He is told that he committed his crime in the following way. In his body there lives a kind of " beast," * very largely independent of his personality and will. When the culprit was sleeping, this beast left the body of the man lying on the mat in the hut, and went and placed the lizard in the stomach of the person who is ill. Having done this, the beast hastened back to the hut, and re-entered the sleeping body. When the man awoke in the morning, he was entirely ignorant of what he (or his " beast ") had done during the night. But when the diviner actually pro- duces the lizard, the man is dumbfounded and exclaims : * I describe the affair as natives have described it to me. The account given above is not nearly so full as that given in the admirable paper by M. Junod referred to in the previous chapter. KAFIR CONCEPTIONS OF JUSTICE 89 " Eh ! sirs, but I admit I must have done this thing ; I remember nothing about it, but indeed I ovm that I deserve to be punished for doing this evil thing." And what is more, the man's best friends will leave him in horror, and will say in the name of justice that such a wretch should not be allowed to Hve, for he has been secretly working evil against the clan. The Kafirs also differ from us fundamentally as to what constitutes sufficient evidence to condemn a person ; and this difference sometimes works to our serious disadvantage. A native chief ^vill not hesitate for a moment to condemn a man of whose guilt he has no doubt, even though nothing in the shape of what we regard as formal proof of the man's guilt has been adduced. Our magistrates may be assured of a man's guilt, but unless the evidence is tech- nically complete, the man is given the benefit of the doubt. For example, a chief is accused of fomenting rebellion : we may be morally certain that he is guilty, but unless we can bring formal proof that will be accepted in our own courts of law, the man will be discharged with his character cleared, and with added power to do mischief. And more than that : the Kafirs who look on laugh at our weakness and divine in a moment that they have the whip-hand of us. It is not so they would treat us if we fell into their hands : they would give us summary Kafir justice. The natives know how to take advantage of the curious ideas of the white men better than the white men know how to take advantage of the ideas of the Kafirs. It would be difficult to beat the " appKed ethnological knowledge" which led a whole army of Kafirs, when caught in a bad strategic position in one of our old Border Wars, to sit 90 KAFIR SOCIALISM down unarmed in front of our soldiers. They knew we would not shoot down unresisting people, and took ad- vantage of their knowledge. It is hard to decide whether this incident showed more shrewdness or a greater sense of humour. (10) Then come the law's delays. The Kafirs like to have justice meted out to them while the blood is hot : half the zest of the " justice " evaporates if the delay be prolonged. If it be said that we are confusing two things, namely, the nature of justice and the method of its admin- istration, the reply must be that this is precisely what the Kafir, in keeping with every English school-boy, does. To tell the school-boy that, if he will but wait, he may get abstract justice from some " just beast " of a headmaster, is to talk nonsense to him. He would rather not have that sort of justice ; for to have to wait while the headmaster pries into things would be very awkward and very unsatis- factory. By the time the master had examined the case, the whole desire for redress would have vanished. In addition to this, every Kafir winces at the thought of en- countering the schoolmaster of a magistrate, just as every school-boy winces at the idea of encountering the magistrate of a schoolmaster. Both Kafir and school-boy expect that all sorts of awkward questions will be asked ; and the very witnesses fear that the magistrate or schoolmaster may bring up some past actions of the witnesses themselves, even though such things have no connection with the matter in hand. There is probably neither a native nor a school-boy who is not conscious that he has done things that his judges would condemn, if only they knew about them : and the longer the delay in settling the question, the longer is the KAFIR CONCEPTIONS OF JUSTICE 91 victim kept on tenter-hooks. So while the Kafir is kept waiting for the judgment of the white magistrate, he is all the time kept in an uncomfortable condition of anxiety as to which of his misdeeds the magistrate will refer ; for if every man got his desert few of us would escape whipping. The Kafirs think that judgment should be carried out immediately after the verdict has been given. They really cannot take the white man seriously when, with much pomp and seriousness, he inflicts the death penalty and then grants a reprieve. In the eyes of the Kafir that is not justice ; it is mere folly. We may think it important to delay an execution lest there might possibly have been some miscarriage of justice. But that is not what the Kafir is thinking about. If, while our blood was hot, we were even to shoot down the man suspected of rebellion, the Kafir would quite understand our action even though he pretended he did not : it is just what the Kafir himself would do if he were in our place. Our final insult consists in the employment of Kafir policemen, who are, as a rule, men of mean extraction. These " dogs of the Government," as they are called by the Kafirs, are universally hated ; they are nearly always tyrannical, and not infrequently grossly immoral, abusing the moral support they get from the white man to ride a high horse when they enter a native kraal. When a Kafir is given unlimited power to lord it over men who would look down upon him in the ordinary tribal life, he becomes ten times more cruel and callous than the very worst white man. The supervision of these native policemen by white men is necessarily inadequate. It is less so in the towns, no doubt ; though the place where the white supervision 92 KAFIR SOCIALISM is most wanted is the districts far away from civilisation. But that is just where the native policeman, on account of the expense, cannot be adequately supervised. Moreover, it would be useless and superfluous to have native police at all if they were invariably accompanied by white men. We are periodically informed on official authority that the native police do not abuse their power. It rarely occurs to us to note that the white Government official who makes such a statement naturally never sees the evil complained of, and is the worst possible judge of the subject, for the native policeman is on his good behaviour when the white official is at hand. I have frequently seen these native policemen entering kraals far away from civilisation ; I say nothing about the way the women fly in terror to the bush ; but the overbearing manner put on by these men when swaggering about a kraal is peculiarly galling to a self-respecting Kafir. It is bad enough to be roughly handled by men of an alien race, but to be so treated by inferior members of their own race is regarded by the Kafirs as atrocious. When this subject of the differences in the sense of justice is considered in all its bearings, we cease to wonder that the Kafir dislikes our impartial British justice. It is the irony of fate that the very love of justice — that quality on which every Briton prides himself, and which is the one thing he thinks is alone necessary for the successful management of backward races — should be the very thing of all others to aggravate and comphcate the native problem. " The philosophic administrator of a native district," says Mr. Scully, a Cape magistrate well known for his KAFIR CONCEPTIONS OF JUSTICE 93 patient study of Kafir thought, " may draw comfort from the reflection that in the more difficult future other hands than his will hold the plough. Problems ahead make one almost afraid to think. When one considers the tremen- dous increase of population, and remembers there is no room for expansion in any direction, the prospect looks dark indeed. What will become of these inarticulate myriads whose standards of righteousness we are so rapidly destroying, and to whom our standard of righteousness is so unintelligible ? " Unable ourselves to recognise any good in customs and modes of thought which were not familiar to us, we expected the Kafirs instantly to divine the value and beauty of our customs and modes of thought with which they were not familiar. We expected the savage to be broader-minded than ourselves. The old standards of righteousness familiar, and in many directions extremely effective, in Kafir society scandalised our moral sense — partly on account of our taking but little pains to understand the Kafir point of view, and partly because we are so slow to see anything good in customs that are unfamiliar to us. These standards of righteousness, such as they were, were rooted in the Clan-System. With the best intentions we set to work to destroy this system, and we have as yet supplied no ade- quate substitutes that a primitive people can understand. Our moral sense or our soft sentiment, it matters not which, made it impossible for us to place severe and effective restraints in the place of those we removed : as a con- sequence we have bred lawlessness and crime, and have undermined the morality of the people. It is time we brought to bear on this difficult problem less sentiment 94 KAFIR SOCIALISM and more intelligence, lest our moral impulses bring disaster on South Africa. It should be plain, at this stage of our study, that the mode of organisation of society produces far-reaching effects in the fundamental conceptions of people and races. Laws and privileges that are excellently well adapted to a nation of individualists are inadequate or pernicious in a socialistic community. A race must grow its own laws, just as an animal must grow its skeleton, so as to meet its own special requirements. All organisms are such delicate things that if we upset the balance in one direction we produce many unlooked-for consequences in other direc- tions. With this idea in our minds, let us proceed to examine the question as to whether political ideals that are suited to individualistic Europe are helpful or baneful to the socialistic Kafirs. CHAPTER III THE NATIVE FRANCHISE There are but two possible types of theory with regard to the political status of the Kafir, though each of these is divided into endless sub-groups. On the one hand, it is pro- posed that we should fuse the Kafirs into our democratic, individualistic, political life, giving them a voice in South African affairs ; on the other hand, it is suggested that we should keep the Europeans and Kafirs politically separate, ruling the natives in a parental fashion and leaving them more or less to cherish socialistic ideals. At present we are trying to combine both methods — with unfortunate results. Politicians find the problem a most difficult one to argue upon, largely owing to their very slight acquaintance with the Kafir of the kraal, who, in spite of Native Commissions, remains much of an unknown quantity : it is not surprising, therefore, to find political publicists taking refuge in the vaguest of terms. But surely we must be getting a little tired of being told that our methods must be founded on " justice and humanity," as Sir R. Solomon sagely tells us, or that " the natives must not be kept in a state of virtual slavery," as Dr. Jameson, catching the popular cry of the hour and wishing to make party capital at the expense of Natal and the Transvaal, adroitly says ;, or that we should adopt " a humane and just native policy, removed alike from the impracticabilities of uninformed 96 KAFIR SOCIALISM sentiment and from the spirit of uneducative repression," as we were grandiloquently told in the colonial address presented to Lord Milner ; or, again, that it is to be hoped that the new Transvaal Government will show a proper recognition of the principle, " equal rights for all civilised men," as the Under-Secretary of the Colonies, quoting Cecil Rhodes, said in answer to a very awkward question asked in the House of Commons. We are all of us agreed as to the excellence of all these platitudes, for who imagines the policy he favours to be unjust, deficient in humanity, tainted with slavery, impracticable, uninformed, senti- mental, uneducative, repressive or neglectful of every human " right " ? We differ as to the blessedness of such abstract and vague catchwords no more than we do as to the truths of the multiplication table ; but we need some one to explain clearly to us precisely what, in the case of the Kafirs, is just, unrepressive, practicable, humane, educative and civilised ; for it is on these points that we all differ. Take, for example, the expression, " equal rights for all civilised men " : the phrase seems irreproachable, and yet no less than five out of the six words, when used in connec- tion with the Native Problem, are vague and inexact in their connotation, as the following brief examination will show.* Equal. — Apart from the fact that no system of franchise has yet been devised that, even in theory, gives one vote * This vagueness of expression is accountable for more trouble than is generally imagined. Leaving South Africa, let us take an example from India, where racial problems are perhaps more intricate than they are in South Africa. Holland, in his " Jurisprudence," says : " The commissioners for preparing a body of substantive law for India recom- mended that the judges should decide such cases ' in the manner they THE NATIVE FRANCHISE 97 one value, black and white will never agree in such a simple thing as taxation. But equality in taxation is one of the most essential aspects of equality in political rights. The white men say that indirect taxation is not " equal " because black men do not thus pay a fair proportion of the national expenses : the natives say that all systems of hut tax are unequal because white men do not pay their share ; when the Kafir has to pay ten hut taxes, simply because he has ten wives, he complains of the inequality, and feels that he should be rewarded and not penalised for doing his duty and strengthening the State — or should at least be given ten votes : when a poll-tax is applied without respect to colour, the educated natives are up in arms at once, and say the tax is unequal because white men earn five times the wages that Kafirs receive. Whatever aspect of political life we touch, similar invincible differences of opinion as to equality of rights are found. Rights. — But what are to be regarded as " rights " ? The white man maintains that he has a right to the land he buys and improves, but the Kafir regards such ownership as usurpation, for he thinks the land belongs to the natives on account of priority of possession. The white man re- torts that on that theory the Kafirs should be dispossessed and the land given to the Bushmen, for they were in the country before them. The white man also says that the Kafirs have no right to carry arms or to buy liquor, but the deem most convenient with the principles of justice, equity, and good conscience.' " These words are considerably more definite than the words " Equal rights for all civilised men," and yet, in a foot-note, Holland says: "Sir Fitzjames Stephen seems to have maintained that such attractive phrases mean 'little more than an imperfect under- standing of imperfect collections of not very recent editions of English text-books ' " (p. 37). G 98 KAFIR SOCIALISM educated natives agitate for both these " rights." Again, Europeans and Kafirs differ radically as to the relative rights of the individual and of the corporate community or clan. It is quite impossible to define " rights " in a way that will please all parties concerned. All. — And how shall we determine the meaning of this simple word ? Shall it include Randlords who spend three months, six months, a year, three years, out of the country ? Shall it include Kafirs who do the same ? Shall it cover natives who migrate from the kraal to the Rand, or from one colony to another? Shall it include British soldiers and Government servants (who form a very large class in South Africa) ? After giving expression to the ambiguity I am discussing, the Under-Secretary for the Colonies wrote to Mr. R. Bell, M.P. {see the Times, January 18, 1907), justifying a circular " to restrain the servants of the Central South African Railways from taking an active part in political agitation arising out of the approaching elec- tions." He remarked : " Wherever State servants take an active part in the warfare of political parties there is always the danger that triumphant political parties " — was he here thinking of the agitation to increase the number of Liberal Justices of the Peace in England ? — " will try to job their own supporters into positions of profit and trust and to exclude their opponents. Such a system has been found everywhere to be fatal to good Government, and we should certainly not be justified in doing anything to intro- duce it into those new colonies for whose fair start we are responsible." So it was decided that these men should be allowed to join any political association, and even to sign requisitions to candidates : but " prominent political THE NATIVE FRANCHISE 99 activities " were denied them. It is difficult to decide whether this arrangement throws light on the meaning of the word " equal," or " rights," or " all," or " civilised," or " men." The chief fact of importance seems to be that Mr. Winston, wishing to favour the Dutch at the expense of the British, would adopt one definition of — shall we sa • ? — the word " all," and later on Mr. Churchill would use the word in a different sense when the exigencies of Party required a catchword in the House of Commons. The word is thus seen to be a most inexact and accommodating one ; an election might be won on the adroit usage of the word. Civilised. — But who would venture to define the word, seeing we have to deal with a very slow progression that vignettes off from absolute savagery on the one hand up to, let us say, Government Ministers on the other? Who could possibly draw a line to please all parties ? The word is too inexact and artificial to be of any service when used in the above connection. Men. — Finally, what constitutes a man ? Shall we say a male human being above the age of twenty-one ? There are well-known racial differences as to the age at which people reach manhood, and the Malays, Indians, Chinese and Kafirs would all have to be consulted in this matter. The Kafirs always contend that a male reaches manhood at the circumcision rite, or at the initiation into the clan, which usually takes place between the ages of sixteen and eighteen. It would be a great insult to refuse to such a lad the name of " man," for he is very proud, not only of the adult clan-privileges he receives at such a time, but also of the much-coveted name of man, which he may then use for the first time ; and, indeed, in many ways a 100 KAFIR SOCIALISM Kafir lad of eighteen is as mucli grown up as a white man of twenty-one. I have but pointed out a few of the most obvious and superficial differences of meaning in the above five words ; the moment the politician got to constructive work, he would find many other differences awaiting solution. None of the terms used can for one moment be regarded as the exclusive property of any person or party, though many politicians seem anxious to annex them for their own exclusive use. Thus it comes about that we are asked to choose between two diametrically opposed policies, each of which is ex- pressed in irreproachable Pecksniffian language, and each of which threatens us ^vith the most dire alternatives. When asked to state which we like the better, we can only reply with the children that we like both best. Our politicians play with fictions, and because their painted ship is making rapid progress on their painted ocean, they imagine that South African problems are being solved. If it is sound rather than sense, appearance rather than reahty, that we want, then we should be charmed with the terminological ambiguities offered to us. Our national progress has been so intimately connected with our political development that we are apt to assume, not only that the former was the result of the latter, but also that no other race can hope to advance unless it follows in the same path. We feel in a dim way that political methods, which more or less satisfy our sense of expediency, must of necessity satisfy a similar feeling in all other races. We forget how slow has been our own political develop- ment, and we ignore the fact that there are not wanting THE NATIVE FRANCHISE 101 symptoms to indicate that our own custom needs a change. Even our democratic newspapers to-day are discussing the causes of the smallness of the number of men who exercise their right of voting ; and in the most democratic of our colonies, so difficult is it to get people to take an in- terest in politics that it is even proposed— not in the comic papers, as one might have expected— to penalise people who do not use their vote by refusing them the suffrage. Every nation that is substantially contented with its form of government virtually enjoys self-government : and conversely, a race that has an alien form of government forced on it, even though that form of government be accompanied with universal suffrage, is not free. It has been well said that " every nation is free whose institutions are adequate to its needs." A people that is content to sit down quietly under a form of government which we regard as a tyranny has clearly not yet arrived at that stage of development at which it can make good use of democratic rule. We know that there is " Nationality in Drinks " : for there is Claret, there is Tokay, and there is British Beer : we scarcely need a Browning Society to explain to us the meaning of the particular poem to which I refer. But apparently we do need an Ethnological Society to prove to us that if there be nationality in drinks much more must there be nationality in methods of government. Ethnology is bound ultimately to destroy our insular idea that there is in the supernal heights of the British heavens a platonic pattern of perfect government suited to all races of mankind. There would seem to be two axioms with regard to the political development of the Kafii'S. The fii-st is that. 102 KAFIR SOCIALISM while we should give them every privilege they can use wisely for their own good and for the good of the country, we should force on them no privilege that will lead to more harm than good ; the second is that the people should not be given what Mr. Bryce calls the " doubtful boon " of the franchise before they feel the need of it. In deciding a question of this nature the argument from analogy is apt to lead us astray, and to confuse the issues. It does not follow because some backward race, whose condition and environment in no sense resemble those of the South African natives, has made good use of the franchise, that the system would suit the Kafirs. Nothing there- fore is proved in favour of granting the franchise when it is argued that the system has worked well amongst negroes of a different type in a different land. Analogy, however, may prove helpful in a negative way, for if it can be shown that the granting of the franchise has proved a failure amongst negroes more advanced than the Kafirs, then at least we have cause for walking warily. The case of the Kafirs can be argued on its own merits, and I now proceed to give some reasons why I think the franchise should not be granted to the natives. (1) The Kafirs will never fuse with us politically, and any attempt to bring them into our pohtical system will lead to far more loss than gain both to them and to us. I have pointed out above how loose is the language employed when politicians discuss the Native Problem. Now looseness of expression is not only frequently the result, it is also the cause, of looseness of thought. So long ago as 1842, we find Lord Stanley instructing Sir George Napier, when bargaining with the emigrant Boers of Natal, to insist on THE NATIVE FRANCHISE 103 a clause to the effect that " there should not be, in the eye of the law, any distinction or any disqualification whatever founded on mere difference of colour, origin, language, or creed ; but that the protection of the law, in letter and in substance, should be extended impartially to all alike." * Quite recently an educated native in Natal, the Rev. J. L. Dube, has taken up liis parable, and in an inflammatory letter has asked : " Why should the colour of a man make a difference as to his obtaining his rights f any more than the colour of his hair or his eyes ? " What are we to say to this question that is often echoed in England ? There are, amongst others, two main answers ; and the first is that we do not propose to withhold the franchise from any one because of his " mere colour," but because, when a Kafir is brought into contact with white men on equal terms, any form of competition leads to the hopeless defeat of the black man, who invariably loses more than he gains by his " privilege " ; and the second reason is that we wish to give the educated Kafir (who is the only person who wants the franchise) something that is very much better for his race than the thing he clamours for. With regard to Dube's question, the colour of the eyes and of the hair is accompanied with but a very trifling * Theal's " History of South Africa," vol. 1834-1854, p. 353. "i" It is just this question of " rights " that has to be settled. It is a cavalier procedure for one of the disputants to assume the necessary truth of his view of the problem under discussion. The inquiry is, WTiat are the " rights " of Kafirs in contact with a civilised race that is immeasurably superior in knowledge ? That question cannot be solved by insisting on the assumptions of one of the disputants. Let us suppose but for a moment that the existence of these " rights " depends on the performance of certain duties that all civiUsed nations recognise — and where do Kafir " rights " come in then ? 104 KAFIR SOCIALISM • difference in the underlying nature : * but the difference in the colour of the skin is correlated with far vaster temperamental difEerences. That Dube does not see through his verbal fallacy is proved by his further state- ment : " Let us compare our status with other subjects of the EngHsh. How is it in New Zealand ? In that land there are of the aborigines about 50,000 people called Maoris. They are as black as we are. White men only came there about twenty years before they came to us ; but for more than twenty years those people have had representatives in the government — four of their own men chosen by themselves to stand for them in Parliament." Because Maoris are black {sic), therefore they are on all fours with Kafirs ! But what about the relative mental capacity and temperamental differences ? " Colour " is not even skin-deep, as any one who examines a micro- scopical section of a Kafir's skin will see ; the coloration is confined to the single layer of the superficial cells of the thick skin. It is not the colour of the skin that makes the Kafir ; and the difficulty does not lie in the superficial, but in the deep-seated differences, physiological, psychical and temperamental, that for some reason or other are in- tegrally correlated with the colour of the skin. The ques- tion as to why we should make " colour " the occasion of discrimination seems to be so simple and answer-compel- ling that people get flurried and forget that the question derives what little plausibility it possesses from looseness of expression and from the superficiality of popular thought ' * I speak comparatively. It seems to have been proved that the blonde type of European with blue eyes is considerably less fertile in town life than the dark type with brown eyes. THE NATIVE FRANCHISE 105 on racial problems. It is forgotten that the real question is concerned with almost everything but colour ; con- sequently few people seem to detect the fallacy that lurks in the misuse of a word that has two connotations, one direct and the other metaphorical ; for the word " colour " may refer either to the tint of the skin or else to constitu- tional differences of character, outlook on life, and racial characteristics. Just as the expressions Eastern and Western, when applied to an individual, refer, not to his actual place of abode at the moment, but to his heredity and temperament, so the word " colour " may refer to a man's nature rather than to the colour ot his skin. Cole- ridge has said : " I for one do not call the sod under my feet my country ; but language, religion, laws, government, blood ; identity in these makes men of one country." He might also have said that identity in these things makes men of one " colour." It is a " mere " accident that the sense of sight rather than that of, let us say, smell, should be the first to acquaint us with the profound hidden differences I have spoken of ; otherwise we should be speaking popularly of questions of odour rather than of colour. A sailor at a fashionable sea-side resort recently complained of the inadequacy of an excellent photograph of the local harbour, and justified his criticism by the remark that the photograph entirely failed to convey any impression of the characteristic and evil smell. People in England, who get most of their knowledge of the Kafir from picture-books or the illustrated papers, are apt to think unduly of the Kafirs in terms of colour, and wonder why there should be such a social and political cleavage on account of it. Were the photographs 106 KAFIR SOCIALISM but duly scented, they would learn a very valuable lesson. Not only do the white men object to the smell of the natives ; the Kafirs also complain of the sickly and un- pleasant odour of the white man. Sir Ian Hamilton has told us that the Japanese say the very same thing about an Englishman fresh from his morning tub. Now a man might live very comfortably with a woman whose skin was any colour of the rainbow, so long as she was a companion- able sort of person ; but he would find it difficult to live happily in the constant society of a person whose odour was offensive. Speaking for myself, I think the colour of a Kafir's skin, especially when he has well greased himself, is extremely fine : in almost every way it is superior to the sickly colour of the average European. One has only to see a white man bathing alongside of Kafirs to be convinced that he is but a bleached specimen of humanity. Mr. Bryce has said : " Nothing really arrests intermarriage except physical repulsion, and physical repulsion exists only where there is a marked difference in physical aspect, and especially in colour." If the word colour be expanded so as to cover odour, the statement may be accepted. One cannot argue with a dislike that is so profound and instinc- tive. " It needs something more than the virtue of a philosopher — it needs the tenderness of the saint — to preserve the same courtesy toward the members of a backward race as is naturally extended to equals." * The social fusion of the races of South Africa is impossible. Where the difficulty of social intercourse is felt on one side only, there may be some chance of an ultimate blending of the races, but when the barrier is acutely felt * Bryce, " Romanes Lecture," p. 40. THE NATIVE FRANCHISE 107 by both parties, as it is in South Africa, a rapprochement is impossible. Religion also seems powerless to uproot these deep-seated prejudices. The Dutch, who are by far the most religious people in South Africa, will not allow coloured persons into their churches. The English churches are not so exclusive in this respect, — anyhow in theory ; yet they cannot be said to have begun to break down the barrier. If religion is powerless to unite two peoples, it is not likely that politics will prove effective. When one race says to another : " I will buy with you, sell with you, talk with you, walk with you, and so following, but I will not eat with you, drink with you, nor play with you," there is no chance of their fusing in political life. The races will remain distinct, and will cherish antagonistic ideals. It is therefore better for the Kafirs that they should be brought into contact with white men as little as possible, and vice versa ; for the entire separation of the races, with mutual contentment, is better than intermingling with constant exhibition of ill-will. Tolerance is easier to cultivate when occasions for the clashings of interests are reduced to a minimum. The question we are discussing is far more important than many people imagine. The idea that discrimina- tion in legislation is inherently unjust has ever appealed to theorists, who object to it, not because it does not tend to the greatest happiness of the people ruled, but because it offends their sentiment with regard to ihe abstract equality of all human beings. They will continue to ask, no matter how much the fallacy is exposed, why a mere difference of colour should make it necessary to treat people differently. Their argument seems to be that because all 108 KAFIR SOCIALISM human beings are men, therefore all human beings are equal and should be treated as equals. Without going into the logic of such an argument, it is not difficult to see that the facts on which it is based are at fault. The truth is — and all the facts at the base of the doctrine of evolution can be called in as witness — that all men are not equal. It is a suggestive fact that the ignorant Boer farmers of Natal were able to see through the fallacy that deceived Lord Stanley and Sir George Napier. They pointed out, in reply to the British demands which have been referred to above, that even if nature had not made a great consti- tutional difference between white men and black, the training of the two races during countless generations had been so unlike that it was impossible they should live harmoniously together under exactly the same laws. They remarked that one might as well try to put a horse and an ox in the same yoke. They looked beneath the skin and thus saw that what actually was in question was, not the colour of the skin, but the entire difference of conception as to what the two races considered just and desirable. To be fair to one was to be unfair to the other and vice versa. Taught by the hard logic of facts, we have had to abandon our doctrinaire attitude, and have had to govern the natives under a discriminating native code. This necessity should have been obvious to the most sujoerficial observer. Take, for example, such a subject as polygamy: if we have one law for black and white, then we must either commit folly in sanctioning polygamy among white men, or else we must most unjustly drive all the native races of South Africa into violent opposition. There are many similar points that might be pointed out, but it is striking that such an obvious thing as this did not occur THE NATIVE FRANCHISE 100 to our statesmen in England. Now the moment we allow any discrimination whatever, no matter on what subject, we give away the entire case for " no discrimination " ; for the whole theory of the policy is based on the supposed equality of all men. As the Kafirs say, it is the chip that killed the elephant. Admit that the races differ as to equality in but one direction, and the whole theory goes by the board. If the theory is to be accepted, then we can allow no discriminating privileges with regard to, let us say, land ; no discrimination as to civic obligations ; no discrimination as to taxation ; and no discrimination as to liquor laws, and so forth. But under such conditions it would obviously be impossible to rule a backward race that is in contact with a forward one. So long as nature makes profound discrimination in the character of races so long must the statesman do the same in politics. We had better frankly admit that when two races differ so much that they require discriminating legislation (and moreover cannot fuse either in social or religious life), it is better to keep them politically distinct. The love of maintaining an abstract unity on paper must not be allowed to hide from us the immense temperamental differences — differences, amongst other things, as to individualism and collectivism — that lie behind colour. What we need to do is to consider the government of the whites on its own merits, and that of the Kafirs also on its own merits : if we separate entirely these two functions, we give each race a chance to work out its own ideal, and we reduce to a minimum the conflict a ising from different racial aspira- tions. Where these functions are separated, as, for example, in the Crown Colony of Basutoland, we find that a modus Vivendi has become established, and we note that the 110 KAFIR SOCIALISM system works well, though of course there is room for improvement even in that district. (2) The franchise is not in keeping with the genius of the people, and would not be a form of true self-govern- ment. The Kafirs have given expression of their own ideas on self-government in the formation of the Clan- System, which has given the people great satisfaction. The people have been amazingly patient and content under the rule of their chiefs, even when these men abused their power : how much more content would they be under the rule of their chiefs if we simply guaranteed that such abuses should never again occur ? To say the least, it is doubtful whether the natives will ever be as happy under the franchise as they have been under their chiefs. And the vast bulk of the people would rather bear the ills they have than fly to others that they know not of. There are no doubt many things about which the Kafirs are uneasy. They are conscious of the workings of race- hatred ; they dislike our system of taxation ; they dread our administration of justice ; they are extremely suspicious of our Missions and of our schools ; they dislike being hustled on along the path of civilisation ; they abhor change of all sorts : it is not any one of these things, however, that is really at the bottom of their unrest, though once their minds are disturbed from a state of stable equilibrium they gather these, and a dozen similar suspicions, in their progress towards revolt. The thing that is the fons et origo mali is the constant dread that we are going to " eat " up their land. If a Kafir could give expression to his fears he would say, the land's the thing ; that is the touch- stone that shows the real attitude of the white man towards THE NATIVE FRANCHISE 111 the black. If all the States of South Africa could but put the native mind at rest on this point, the trouble that is fermenting everywhere would soon disappear : but somehow or other our assurances do not assure the Kafirs. (3) The natives as a whole have not asked for the franchise. To tinker at the constitution is about the last thing a Kafir would think of doing. The native imagines that whatever is, is right : this is his basal thought in politics. With regard to the franchise, we may use the words of the native already quoted : " The black man is not wondering about that." The average Kafir, if left to him- self, would as soon think of asking for a vote for his cows ai for himself. It is only a very small section of educated natives that makes such a noise and pother about the subject ; while most of these agitators have been artificially inoculated from America. The great majority of the natives have never so much as heard that there is such a thing as the franchise, nor would they be able readily to understand what it is even if it were explained to them. There are not many things about the Kafir on which all white men who have had much dealings with them are agreed : but there is one thing, and it is that it is never wise to give a native a thing he has not asked for, because such an action immediately leads to a demand for some- thing else. Newcomers, who scorn to learn from the experience of every white man who made the mistake before them, are always falling into this trap. It is com- monly said in South Africa that the Kafir has no sense of gratitude, but is a confirmed and hopeless beggar ; whereas the very demand for something more is the exhibi- 112 KAFIR SOCIALISM tion of the man's gratitude. The Kafir mode of giving thanks consists in saying: "Don't be tired of giving to- morrow." This remark is meant to imply that the recipient beheves the donor is so very liberal that he can never be tired of giving. That is not a British way of returning thanks, and so the average colonist is unable to believe that the Kafir is thankful when he uses such language. In keepinT; with this idea of thanking a man by begging and by showing belief in his liberality, a native always holds out two hands to receive the smallest gift. The Briton has such a love of independence that he cannot understand any one acting in this way. But the Kafir is a beggar partly because he is grateful. So it happens that when a man gives a raw Kafir a sixpence, the fellow holds out both his hands with which to take it, and promptly asks for a shilling, though he has not the least desire to have the money. He would entirely understand the Arab Sheik who gave money to a necessitous friend with the words, " Ennoble me by accepting these two piastres." As a result of this racial mode of giving thanks, it comes about that no sooner does the most ephemeral whim cross the mind of a native than he asks for the boon. A native once noticed something desirable about my boots and gaiters, and unblushingly asked me to take them off and give them to him. He saw nothing strange in the request. The English- man feels it a sort of degradation to act thus : to beg he is ashamed. In the case of the Kafir such an emotion simply does not exist : to beg well is one of the graces of life, and who is ashamed of his graces ? If the Kafir feels the least desire for the franchise he will ask promptly for two franchises so as to ensure getting one. To press political THE NATIVE FRANCHISE 113 boons on the natives as though they were shamefacedly disinclined to demean themselves by begging for a gift, is the sheerest folly and shows a radical misunder- standing of native character. The Kafir never suffers in silence for the loss of a thing he passionately desires : his conscious wants are never inarticulate. However, sentimental friends of the Kafirs are never tired of harrowing our feelings with regard to the sufferings of the natives. I quote a typical passage from a recent book written to accuse the Europeans in South Africa of tyrannising over the natives. The indictment runs as follows : " You have seen a little child who has cried for some- thing till in sheer weariness and despair he has cried himself to sleep. By-and-by the mother will come and take the child into her arms, and kiss his tear-stained cheek, and when he awakes his tears will change to smiles ; for to the mother-heart the silence that has sobbed out its grief is a more pitiful appeal than any sound — and the silent cry of Africa will be heard at last." Where amongst the actual Kafirs do we find tear- stained cheeks ? Where the silence that has sobbed out its grief ? Where the silent crying in sheer weari- ness and despair ? Where the Kafir who cries himself to sleep ? Nay, rather, where do we find the Kafir who does not without the slightest embarrassment ask for all, and far more than all, he wants ? The fact that the natives do not ask for the franchise may be regarded therefore as the surest of all proofs that they do not really want it. H 114 KAFIR SOCIALISM When it is said that the Kafirs have not asked for the franchise, reference is only made to the raw natives. In recent years the civilised Kafirs, who have broken entirely with all clan-relationships, and who have now become a small and exclusive party of their own, have been agitating on the subject of the franchise. If we may judge by the violence and intemperance of their language, this handful of educated Kafirs wants the franchise very badly. It would, however, be folly to listen to the clamour of these men who make extravagant demands, for they do not quite know what they want, and would soon be more discontented than ever if they got what they demanded. Our difficulties would be enormously increased if we were to exploit the interests of a clique to the detriment of the whole com- munity. A nation must rise as a whole, and those who form the vanguard must not lose touch with the main body. That cannot be a racial demand which is unknown even in name to the majority of the people. The question can be reduced to its true proportions by asking whether in England we shovdd alter our entire constitution because half a member kept creating a continual disturbance in the House of Commons. (4) The Kafirs are not fitted to profit by the franchise even if it were granted to them, for democracy is a concep- tion alien to their past thought. The natives have a sententious proverb, which says that height is not reached in a hurry. This is their own shrewd remark that is addressed to all young men who are in great haste. I have more hope than many have with regard to the future of the Kafir, and for that reason I feel anxious that the natives should not be led into a cul-de-sac. If they are THE NATIVE FRANCHISE 115 left to follow their own natural political development, the result arrived at will be more stable and will have a more permanent value than the outcome of any impatient patch- work of our own. It is of the utmost importance that the Kafirs should not get their attention artificially turned to futile topics. There are far more important things than the franchise for the educated natives to think about. At present it is largely the bizarre and the fantastic that appeal to them, and every crack-brained idea that is mooted is apt to occupy their thoughts unduly. They are not yet capable of taking long views on the problems that arise from the contact of the races, and, like children, would gaily sacrifice the future for the present. The natives are quite capable, so long as they are not in contact with Europeans, of managing their own affairs : but they cannot steer their course aright when they are brought into contact or competition with white races. It is agreed on all sides, on the side of the Kafir no less than on that of the European, that a social fusion of the races is im- possible : why then should we seek to bring the Kafirs into the stress and turmoil of our political life ? It is difficult to conceive a more risky thing for the future of South Africa than to throw two races, which are entirely distinct socially, into violent conflict on political matters. Even the educated natives are better ofi attending to the things that concern their own progress than they would be in meddhng with matters that do not concern them by carrying on a race- warfare at the Polls. They have more than sufficient work before them in attending to education, industry, and the evolution of their race. The granting of the fra-'chise would not only distract the 116 KAFIR SOCIALISM attention of the natives from urgent to trivial matters, but it would certainly lead to accentuated race-animosity: it would throw the respective interests of the races into conflict, and it would make racial problems perennial. If only this question could be settled once and for all, then the various parties would recognise the fact that it was useless to pit race against race ; they would then bury the subject of their differences and turn their attention to the next thing. If we insist on keeping alive racial conflict by endless conflict at the hustings, we must be prepared for the inevitable consequence ; racial problems will then remain an open sore, for as long as a man looks at a grievance it worries and chafes him. The very machi- nery of political life would stir up race-hatred owing to a great increase of racial contact ; and it would do this at a time when both the parties had their passions inflamed by frothy eloquence. At present the white men are, on the whole, well disposed towards the natives ; but any granting of the franchise would be certain to stir up slumbering fires. There are plenty of white men keen on the welfare of the Kafirs, and who will see that no injustice is done to them. And as for the natives, they are happier, more contented, and generally better off under parental government than they would be when frittering away their time in fighting the white man on the political platform. Mr. Bryce has summed up admirably the relative advan- tages and disadvantages of such a situation, thus : " If one race enjoys privileges denied to the other, it is likely to abuse its power to the prejudice of the backward people, placing them, it may be, under civil as well as THE NATIVE FRANCHISE 117 political disabilities, or imposing heavier taxes upon them, or refusing them their fair share of benefits from the public revenue. If, on the other hand, both races are treated alike, granted the same suffrage, made eligible for the same offices, each will be disposed to organise itself separately for political purposes, so that a permanent separation of parties will be created, which, because irrespective of the issues that naturally arise from time to time, may prevent those issues from being dealt with on their merits, and may check the natural ebbs and flows of political life. The nation will, in fact, be rather two nations than one, may waste its force on internal dissensions, may lose its unity of action at moments of public danger. Evils of this sort tend to become more acute the more democratic a government becomes." * The Kafirs have been accustomed from time immemorial to fixed and stable rule, and changes of Party would certainly worry them. The one thing necessary for the Kafirs, if they are to rise out of barbarism, is that their minds should be left at peace for many a long year to come. Continuity in government is therefore essential. In this connection reference must be made to the evidence of Dr. Addison given before the Native Commission. He stated most clearly that the natives are mystified by our frequent changes of Ministry, and by our lack of a fixed policy : the result is that the natives say we are always " prodding " them. If it is unfortunate for us to bring the Kafirs partly under our party system, it surely will not mend matters to bring them wholly under it, for then the last vestige of fixed policy will vanish, and the " prodding " would be incessant. The * " Romane3 Lecture," pp. 30, 31, 118 KAFIR SOCIALISM raw natives would be bewildered for many a long day to come, for they would be mere pawns in the party game : the educated natives would, for their own purposes, at first exploit the raw Kafir, who is quite as good a fellow, if not better, than his educated brothers ; for these half-educated natives think only of their own personal interests, and would without a pang of regret let the devil take the unlucky black man who was hindmost. But even the educated natives would soon find out that as they had treated the raw Kafir so would the white men treat them ; for anything, apparently, is fair in British political warfare. It is strange that the educated natives are unable to see that they cannot have it both ways. They want all the advantages of political " rights " that are given only to mature adults, and yet, as all who follow the speeches of the educated Kafirs know, they want also to have at the same time all the discriminating privileges that are given only to children or minors. But the moment they get their political " rights " they will lose their children's privileges. Because they are backward and immature, they ask us to protect them from competition with keen and smart white men, and piteously appeal for discriminating legislation on such a subject as the high rates of usury demanded by shady European money-lenders ; they expect us to secure to them enormous tracts of land — and they insist on having the most fertile land — though thousands of white men are anxious that this land should be thrown into the market. At present we decline to listen to the white people, even though we know they would exploit the land to better purpose than the Kafirs do ; and we base our refusal to listen to the white men simply on the fact that we adopt THE NATIVE FRANCHISE 119 a parental relation to the native, and therefore protect him from the fierce competition of civilisation. The moment we really grant an honest franchise, the Kafirs will find the white man " eating up " the land. In a dozen different ways we protect and shield the natives because of their political immaturity. The educated Kafirs may now clamour for the rights of fully civilised men, but they would be the very first people to cry out when they found that the privileges, granted merely because of their immaturity, were vanishing one by one. The educated natives therefore could not be more short-sighted than to seek to be placed on an absolute equality with white men. They may not now fully realise their immeasurable inferiority to the Europeans ; let them but receive a real franchise and they would find it out with a vengeance. They are insistent on the curtailment of the powers of the chiefs, who do not take them at their own valuation. They may chafe at that now, but they would chafe still more if they were brought into inexorable competition with white men, who would value them even less than do their chiefs. There may be no objection in the abstract to allowing natives who are really sufficiently educated and civilised to appreciate the bearing of South African politics to exercise a vote ; but when we ask how many natives show even an intellectual appreciation of such problems, we must admit that there are very few who are qualified in this respect, though there are pro^:ably fifty thousand natives who fancy themselves quite competent to exercise the vote wisely. A character-test would be essential, and I, for one, am not surprised that, though Natal 120 KAFIR SOCIALISM theoretically grants the franchise to Kafirs of a certain state of civilisation, yet she has added the proviso that the consent of the Governor must be obtained in each individual case before the privilege is granted. (5) The native franchise would almost certainly prove either a sham or a calamity to South Africa. To offer the native even the instalment of a limited franchise would make it inevitable that he would ultimately demand the full gift of manhood suffrage ; it is indeed possible that we should receive ever-increasing demands for fuller and yet fuller representations until in every kraal of the country there was raised the cry, Votes for Women ! It is difficult to see how — unless they threw their hearts into the scales — the recent Native Commissioners failed to perceive that the very cautious scheme they proposed could but end in a demand for manhood suffrage, for the small dole of representation that they propose would but serve as hors- d'ceuvres to the appetite. It is almost certain that if a real franchise were given to the Kafirs, the white men would find means, as in America, of rendering the gift illusive. Mr. Bryce admits that in America it was impossible to give the negroes effective protection in the exercise of the suffrage. The same is un- doubtedly true of South Africa. There is one thing the white men in South Africa are determined on, and that is that the whites and not the blacks must be what the Kafirs call the " Bull in the Kraal." Even Mr. Bryce, who seems to be in favour of a limited native franchise, says : " It is easy for people in Europe, who have had no experience of the presence among them of a semi-civilised race, destitute of the ideas anl habits which lie at the basis of a free THE NATIVE FRANCHISE 121 government, to condemn the action of these colonies, in seeking to preserve a decisive electoral majority for the whites. But any one who has studied the question on the spot, especially any one who has seen the evils which in America have followed the granting of the suffrage to persons unfit for it, will form a more charitable judgment." * It is not necessary to enter into a lengthy description of the various schemes of native representation that have been suggested. These range from the formation of a Council or Debating Society of Hereditary Chiefs — with no executive power — with which the white Government might consult, up to a representation of black men by their full numerical proportion of Kafirs who should actually sit in Parliament. Every conceivable compromise between these extremes has been suggested, though no one seems to have sought to show that the movement could be stayed anywhere short of the logical conclusion in which there would be at least five black men to every white man in Parliament. Neither representation of black men by white men, nor representation by two or three black men, nor representation by men chosen by the Governor to watch native interests, would have the remotest chance of satisfying any sense of need such schemes might awaken. We do not usually give children just a little taste of a thing we know they will eat to excess. And the worst of experimenting in a subject of this sort is that, should the scheme prove impracticable, the recall of such a privilege would stir up every evil passion. * " Impressions of South Africa," p. 452. 122 KAFIR SOCIALISM There are those who reply to my line of argument by pointing to the Cape franchise ; they will say that as a matter of fact the evil consequences I have prophesied have not been found to arise. The reply to such a rejoinder is very simple. The rake's progress is notoriously easy and pleasant in its first stages. In Cape Colony only eight thousand natives out of a quarter of a million adult male Kafirs have a vote : and this pitiful handful of men is broken up into a number of ineffective groups owing to our electoral system. The " blanket " vote is just big enough to cause at times serious complication in questions that have nothing whatever to do with the natives, but it is not large enough to gain for the natives a single thing they want. Regarded as a means of making the will of the people effective, it is a delusion ; for if a franchise be a democratic instrument designed for the practical obtaining of what men want, namely, a voice in the management of their own affairs, then the Cape native franchise is mere tinsel and pinchbeck. Indeed, it is something worse than this, for while it is no good to the Kafirs, it keeps up the illusion that the natives are in some sense " represented " and given self-govern- ment. Those who know anything of party devices in politics will readily see that the Cape franchise is of but little good to the Kafirs. If white men are determined that black men shall not capture the political machine, and with it the country, had they better not say so frankly once and for all ? And can any one believe that we mean to let the quintuple majority of the Kafirs ever become politically effective ? Let us suppose for a moment that an honest franchise is granted to the natives, and that, in the favourite catch- THE NATIVE FRANCHISE 123 word of the hoiir, Colour is not made any test of political rights : what would be the result ? The Kafirs would at once set to work in real earnest to wrest the country from the white man. It is often said that the natives would never unite ; but it is one thing to unite on the field of battle, where fierce and clashing clan-instincts would be sure to arise, but it is quite another — and easier thing — to combine at the polls. Furtherm.ore, it must be remembered that the very granting of such a franchise would not only force on the Kafirs the fact of their immense numerical supe- riority over us, but would also teach them the value of combination. Indeed it would do more ; such an action would be the one thing to break down the very last remains of the Clan-System, which alone keeps Kafirs from combining. But long before things came to such a pass as this, the country would be wrecked by misrule. " Equality of rights," says Mr. Bryce, speaking of the abstract problem, " might seem to be here (in the sphere of poHtics) also that which is fairest and most likely to make for unity and peace. But the backward race may be really unfit to exercise political power, whether from ignorance, or from an in- difference that would dispose it to sell its votes, or from a propensity to sudden and unreasonable impulses. The famihar illustration of a boy put to drive a locomotive engine might in some communities be no extreme way of describing the risks a democracy runs when a suffrage is granted to a large mass of half-civilised men." * (6) The granting of the franchise would immensely complicate colonial politics. Apart from the fact that the * " Romanes Lecture," p. 38. 124 KAFIR SOCIALISM natives might quite conceivably legislate by sheer force of numbers with regard to polygamy and other moral prob- lems in a way that would stagger the world, they would certainly ask for two things that can never be granted them. I refer to Drink and Arms. In saying this one is in no sense drawing on the imagination ; for the educated natives have already in speech and in print demanded the right to carry guns, and have insisted on the removal of the ex- isting liquor restrictions.* I do not think it is necessary to waste time in arguing that the liquor restrictions cannot be removed on any pretext whatever : if they were with- drawn, the country would be turned into a pandemonium in six months. It may be well, in passing, to point out the bearing of this fact : if a people is fit to receive the franchise it is, ex hypothesi, fit to legislate for itself on a topic like this ; and conversely, if it is fit to legislate for itself then it is impossible for us permanently to maintain a restriction on drink against the wish of such enlightened and responsible people. With regard to the demand for the right to carry guns, we must ask for what conceivable object, other than a native rising, could such a request be made ? The educated Kafirs say guns are required for protection and hunting ; but for protection from what ? And for hunting what kind of animal ? Most of the native territories are well- nigh denuded of game and wild animals ; and Natal, from whence the proposal emanates, may be said to be practically free from such things. The only places where guns could be required for shooting game are a few isolated fever * I refer to Cube's letter referred to above, in which both these demands were made. THE NATIVE FRANCHISE 125 districts, where, however, the natives are not asking for this privilege. "With regard to protection, the natives cannot require guns for this purpose, for we do not allow inter- tribal wars, and so there is no one — shall we say, except the white man ? — from whom the natives need to be protected. The barefacedness of the demand at a time when the native franchise is in dispute shows us what we may expect when the Kafir suffrage will be in full swing. If they do these things in a green tree, what will they do in a dry ? The native franchise would also have bearings upon Imperial problems. In the Colonial Parliaments, Imperial problems are for ever cropping up. If the natives enjoyed the franchise, they would make their vnW felt in such matters ; and how can people who have lived all their Uves in a tea-cup understand problems of finance, commerce, and world-politics that have their roots across an ocean ? At present the average Kafir thinks that the white man gets his goods ready-made out of the sea ; yet when granted the suffrage he will give his vote, forsooth, on questions that affect the commerce and politics of nations and conti- nents. If England were embroiled in war, it would be a pretty pass it the action of a native editor of a certain Kafir paper during the Boer War were to be repeated : and repeated it most assuredly would be. That would be bad enough, but it would be as nothing to the asking of awkward questions, and still more awkward voting, by native representatives in the Colonial Parhament. We have sufficient burden of Empire already without going out of our way to add to it. The natives would at one moment vote with sententious wisdom, and would the next, 126 KAFIR SOCIALISM owing to their natural instability of nature and limited knowledge, vote with the most egregious folly : nor could we hope to educate the Kafir to take a place in our political life without passing him through a preliminary stage which would be accompanied with the gravest risk. At the present moment, the few Cape Kafirs who have a vote are on their good behaviour, and have as yet not come to full self -consciousness. Consequently they do not quite know what they want. They are few in number, and are but at the top of the hill ; let them gain impetus through an extension of the franchise, and there is no telling what they may do when obsessed by some silly whim. They are such an uncertain quantity that it would be indeed risky to give them a voice in Imperial or Colonial matters. (7) The experiment of granting the franchise to a back- ward race, that is in close contact with a fonvard one, has been tried on a large scale in America, and it has proved a colossal failure. As has been pointed out above, this analogy might not have much weight unless there were a number of other reasons pointing in the same direction. An argument drawn from the West Indies or from Jamaica, where the interests concerned are not so great or so clashing, and where the conditions of environment are totally dis- ^milar, has really no force. But the analogy of America, where the negroes are far more civilised and more intellectu- ally developed than the Kafirs, is at least suggestive. The humanitarian sentiment of the North imposed its infalli- bility on the practical instincts of the South, and the infallibility of sentiment has gone the way of all its kind. The " intuition " which the North felt sure would lead THE NATIVE FRANCHISE 127 to race-friendship has led to the race-hatred it sought to avoid. It were better never to grant a franchise than, having granted it, to be forced to prevent the recipients avaiUng themselves of the " doubtful boon." If the comparatively advanced American negroes could not be trusted to use the gift, how much less can we expect the backward Kafirs to use it wisely ? In America the relative proportion of blacks to whites is roughly one to ten : in South Africa it is as ten to one.* To prevent the danger of overcolouring the matter, I quote from Mr. Bryce, who, owing to his knowledge of American politics and to his sympathy to backward races, is above suspicion of taking a gloomy view of the matter. Speaking of the granting of the franchise to the American negroes, Mr. Bryce says : " The moral to be drawn from the case of the Southern States seems to be that you must not, however excellent your intentions, and however admirable your sentiments, legislate in the teeth of facts. The great bulk of the negroes were not fit for the suffrage ; nor under the American Federal system was it possible (without incurring other grave evils) to give them effective protection in the exercise of the suffrage. It would, there- fore, have been better to postpone the bestowal of this dangerous boon. True it is that rocks and shoals were set thick round every course ; true that it is easier to perceive the evils of a course actually taken than to realise other evils that might have followed some other course. Nevertheless, the general opinion of dispassionate men * In this latter figure the natives in German and Portuguese territory south of the Zambesi are included. The general granting of a native franchise in British territory would have far-reaching consequences in German and Portuguese territory. 128 KAFIR SOCIALISM has come to deem the action taken in 1879 a.d. a mistake."* In the face of the admissions made by Mr. Bryce the philosopher, when speaking on abstract racial problems, it is somewhat surprising to read the conclusions of Mr. Bryce the politician, with regard to the problem of the native franchise in South Africa. " The tremendous problems," says Mr. Bryce, " presented by the Southern States of America, and the likelihood that similar problems will have to be solved elsewhere, as for instance, in South Africa and the Philippine Isles, bid us ask. What should be the duty and the poHcy of a dominant race where it cannot fuse with a backward race ? Duty and policy are one, for it is equally to the interest of both races that their relations should be friendly. " The answer seems to be that, as regards political rights, race and blood should not be made the ground of discrimina- tion. Where the bulk of the coloured race are obviously unfit for political power, a qualification based on property and education might be established which should permit the upper section of that race to enjoy the suffrage. Such a qualification would, doubtless, exclude some of the poorest and most ignorant whites, and might on that ground be resisted. But it is better to face this difficulty than to wound and alienate the whole of the coloured race by placing them without the pale of civic functions and duties." t Mr. Bryce evidently sees grave difficulties in connection with his own conclusion, which does not seem to rise * " Romanes Let^ture," pp. 39, 40. t Ibid. pp. 42, 43. THE NATIVE FRANCHISE 129 logically out of the facts and metaphors that form his data. In the first place there is no question about " wounding and alienating the whole of the coloured race " in South Africa, because the majority of those people have not the least glimmering idea about our " civic functions and duties." It would therefore be gratuitous folly, for the sake of mere theory, to exclude a large mass of " the poorest and most ignorant whites " from political activity, and so to ensure a certain difficulty, for, at best, a doubtful gain. Such a test as Mr. Bryce proposes, if made at all stringent and effective, would exclude about half the Boer population, a state of affairs that Mr. Bryce's party would never listen to. The plan would lead to endless heart-burnings amongst the white men who were denied a privilege granted to some of the natives. Such men would never consent to remain voiceless and voteless when some Kafirs, centuries behind them in imaginative grasp of world-problems, were allowed to propose, or vote on, a policy that might be destructive of civilisation. But apart from such considerations, even those who think Mr. Bryce wise in placing school-boys — for that is what educated Kafirs are at the best — on the engine of South African progress, must admit that the policy is what medical men call an heroic remedy. Moreover, such a proposal cannot be regarded for one moment, even in theory, as a final solution of the problem; for by intro- ducing arbitrary tests and standards it is lacking in all the essential elements of permanence, and is, at the best, heroic though it be, a mere palliative designed to give relief to one symptom of the trouble. It must fail to solve the problem, if for no other reason, because the politically excited Kafirs would not rest content with I 130 KAFIR SOCIALISM the sweet reasonableness expected by the philosophical Englishman. We should remember the Kafir proverb — it is easier to turn back the enemy from the hill than to drive him out of the village. What then is the conclusion of the matter, and what should we do ? In the first place, we should, I think, as far as possible leave things exactly as they are, altering as little as possible, for amongst primitive races all violent changes are bad. We must accept whole-heartedly the burden of maintaining parental rule, and must own that the Kafirs are not a democratic people. We might inquire into and remove all real grievances, explaining to the natives how unreal are some of the trumped-up ones. This would not be difficult, for the Kafirs are above all things a shrewd people. We should retain every relic we can of the Clan System, even giving back to the chiefs little by little somt of their lost power. This should be done with a clear proviso that any breach of trust on the part of the chiefs, who would, of course, be under white supervision, would be followed by a withdrawal of privilege. Even though this policy might put back the clock in some districts, it would do but little harm, for the hands of the clock have been jerked forward artificially by civilisation and by the Ethiopians. In this way we should give to the Kafirs a larger amount of honest and straightforward self-govern- ment, and since the position of all missionaries and traders would naturally be respected, the seeds of progress would still be present. We might extend the experiment tried by the Cape Colony, and develop the idea that led to the formation of the Transkeian District Council. We THE NATIVE FRANCHISE 131 should interfere as little as possible with the " domestic " affairs of the natives, simply restraining such abuses as the condemning of people on charges of witchcraft, glaring miscarriage of justice, persecution of Christian natives, &c. We should seek to persuade the educated Kafir to stop fostering an artificial demand for the franchise, and should get him to imitate 5