I il CHEIROSOPHY CHEIROGNOMY CHEIROMANCY of ToCra rolvuv S.iravd\ Sffa (patvofiai f3t\riov rCiv S\\uv irpoopur, oi>&' efc ulav, S> HvSpa ' AOyvaioi, oCre Seiv&rrjTa, OUT' aXafovfiar 4iravoiff, ovdi TpocrTrotijcro/toi 81 o&Stv &\\oyiyv I'/ti" eftrw Svo '. AvSpes 'AOyvcuoi, SI tirrv)(la.v, ty ffvuirdoijs ^yw rrjt tv avOpwirois ofcr^s ical cro0i'as opw Kparovffav irtpov di STI irpoiKa. TO. Trpdynara leal \oylo(j.ai, KO.I ovilv \lrfVfiai Kai \tyu de'iai i AHMOZGENOTS '0 HEPI 'EIPHNHZ. JOHAKN HARTLIEB. AUTHOR OF --DIE KUNST CIROMANTIA," 1448. V / A MANUAL OF CHEIROSOPHY Complete practical THE TWIN SCIENCES OF CHEIROGNOMY AND CHEIROMANCY BY MEANS WHEREOF MAY BE READ IN THE FORMATIONS OF THE HANDS PRECEDED BY Introbiutorg ^Ugntiunt npon the av(pbv yeVotro TC fic'AAo? ovvoiavii' TJJ iroAei jrtpt if Wvl (TKO-flTt. AHMOSeEXOY2 'OAYN6IAKO2, A'. " T F the study of Phrenology, of Cheirosophy, and 1 of the sciences which have for their aims the discovery of the true characters and instincts of men by the developments and appearances of their bodies, is merely a frivolous amusement, if such a study ceases for a moment to be a serious one, or if it is merely a distraction for enthusiasts, for people whose love of the marvellous becomes an insatiable greed, it is in every way damnable and to be discouraged, because it results infallibly in super- stition and error. BUT if it is based upon truth, men cannot give themselves up to the study with too much energy, not only on account of the material advantages to be derived therefrom, but because it is an important factor in the considerations which lead to the education of our childrer, who alone represent s 1 8 CHEIROSOPHY. the progress of the future." It is with these words that Adrien Desbarrolles commences the preface o^ his elementary work, " The Mysteries of the Hand " (Paris, 1859) ; and I quote them at the head of this Introductory Argument, as the sentiments conveyed by them are the key-notes, and, as it were, the corner- Scope of dm stones of the composition of this work, my aim in writ- ing this MANUAL OF CHEIROSOPHY having been simply to place before the world a concise and clearly com- prehensible epitome of the principia of a science which opens a new page of the great book of nature to the student who will diligently read it, which gives to youth the experience and the foresight of age, and which endows all men who will study it with that foresight which, under the name of intuitive faculty, is the cherished possession of so few, enunciating and solving the great problem of " Know Thyself." 1 1i 2. I have not set about the task of laying this science discussion. before a critical world with a view to its recognition , as an exact science without being well aware of the difficulties to be surmounted, the prejudices to be overcome, and the apparent anomalies to be explained and reconciled with the dicta of physiology ; but I shall endeavour categorically to discuss every point of the argument, shirking nothing which may seem adverse to my object, and giving undue prominence to nothing which may seem specially favourable thereto. I desire rather to enter upon the discussion after the manner of an uninterested third party, whose only desire is the clearing-away of doubt, and the establishment of a new science, whose full develop- ment must become an enormous advantage to mankind. TheHand Without continuing to announce what I am going 1 " Connais-toi toi-meme ! Belle et sage maxime, a laquelle il est plus aise a la generalite des hommes d'applaudir que de se conformer." D'ARPENTIGNY, "La Science de la Main" (Paris, 1865). 3rd edn. AN INTRODUCTORY ARGUMENT. 19 to do, let me begin by the consideration of that member with which we are particularly concerned, of that complex piece of mechanism wherein we find the radical principles of the science whose bases we are occupied in firmly establishing, and to which we have [if I am right] to look for the history of our lives. There is no part of the human body which is more 1T 4. significant in its actions, which is more characteristic in its formation, than the Hand. I take as an illustra- tion the most elementary indication afforded by the hand, an indication, the instinctive observation of which renders every one, to a certain extent, a Cheiromant, I allude to hand-shaking, an action in itself symbolical, having been adopted in old days for the purpose of showing that the hand con- tained no weapon, so that there should be no danger of treachery between the hand shakers. 2 Has not every one experienced the feeling of confidence and good fellowship expressed by a good, firm grasp of the hand ? the feeling of repulsion and discomfort which conies over one when one is given what a recent essay- ist calls " a hand like a cold haddock," or the instinc- tive distrust which awakens in us at a peculiar or uncomfortably individualized method of shaking hands? It needs, I think, but very little to recommend the f 5. dictum of the ancient philosophers, that to his hands Us ftheh man owes his superiority over all other animals. One recognises the secondary influences of the hand in the writing of books and in the construction of articles of every-day use and necessity, which we cannot think would be produced without hands, though, as has often been remarked, it is not beyond the bounds of possibility for many things which we are accustomed to see done by the hands, to be effected 2 AH the Year Round t voL iii., N.S., 1870, p. 467. 20 CHEIROSOPHY. without them: "We have daily before us," says Sir Charles Bell, " proofs of ingenuity in the arts, not Loss of the hand, only surviving the loss of the hand, but excited and exercised where the hands were wanting from birth. What is more surprising than to see the feet, under such circumstances, becoming substitutes for the hands, and working minute and curious things?" 3 This is, of course, very true ; but when it occurs we are accustomed to look upon it more as a curiosity and a phenomenon, than as a natural consequence of the loss of this all-important member. ^ 6. The wants of man are greater and more varied than h1 wi" those of an y other animal ; and therefore, says Galen, of man. he has had given to him what he alone of animals possesses, and what to him alone is necessary, viz. the hand. " For," says he, " some animals are bold and fierce, others are timid and gentle ; some are gregarious and co-operate for their mutual sustenance and defence ; others are solitary and avoid the society of their fellows ; but all have a form or body accom- modated to their natural dispositions and habits. Thus, the lion has powerful fangs and claws ; the hare has swiftness of foot, but is otherwise defenceless. And the fitness of this arrangement is obvious ; A criminal with- * The same author continues : " Unfortunately, too, the most out hands. diabolical passions will be developed in some natures, and crimes committed which we might have supposed impossible from the power of execution being denied. The most remarkable in- stance of that was in a man who, from birth, was deprived of arms ; as if possessed by a devil, this wretch had committed many murders before being discovered and executed. He was a beggar, who took his stand on the highway some miles from Moscow, on the skirts of a wood ; his manner was to throw his head against the stomach of the person who was in the act of giving him charity, and, having stunned him, to seize him with his teeth, and so drag him into the wood." SIR CHARLES BELL, " The Hand, its Mechanism and Vital Endowments, as evincing design and illustrating the power, wisdom, and goodness of God " (Bridgewater Treatise: London, 1832). AN INTRODUCTORY ARGUMENT. 21 for those weapons with which the lion is furnished are as appropriate to his nature as they would be inappropriate to the timid hare, whose safety, depending entirely on flight, requires that swift- ness of foot for which she is so remarkable. But to man, the only animal that partakes of divine intelligence, the Creator has given, in lieu of every other natural weapon or organ of defence, that instrument, the hand, an instrument applicable to every art and occasion as well of peace as of war. Man, therefore, wants not a hoof, or horn, or any other natural weapon, inasmuch as he is able with his hand to grasp a much more effective weapon, the sword or spear ; for a sword or a javelin are better arms than the nails, and cut and pierce more readily. Nor does he want strong nails like those of a horse, for a stick or a stone hits harder and better than such a nail. Besides which, natural weapons can be employed only in close conflict, while some of the weapons employed by man, such as javelins or arrows, are even more effective at a distance. And again, though man may be inferior to the lion in swiftness, yet, by his dexterity and skill, he breaks in to his use a still swifter animal, the horse, mounted on whose back he can escape from, or pursue the lion, or attack him at every advantage. He is enabled, moreover, by means of this instrument, to clothe himself with armour of various kinds, or to entrench himself within camps or fenced cities, whereas, were his hands encumbered with any natural armour, he would be unable to employ them for the fabrication of those instruments and means which give him such a decided advantage over all the other animals of creation." 4 4 The above is Dr. Kidd's translation (vide " On the Adaptation of External Nature to the Physical Condition of Man ": London, 1833), of the opening chapter of Galen's work entitled, " Claudii Galeni Pergameni secundum Hippocratem medicorum principis, 22 CHEIROSOPHY. r] QpovifiuTaTov elvat. TUI> four avBpuirov' eC \6yov 8% Sia. rb (ppovi^dirarov tlvat x f fyas \a/*- P&vfu>." And Galen remarks on this passage (Op. cit., lib. i.,c. l): " Ita quidem sapientissimum animalium est homo. Ita autem et manus sunt organa sapienti animali convenientia. Non enim quia manus habuit, propterea est sapientissimum, ut Anaxagoras diccbat ; sed quia sapientissimum erat, propter hoc manus habuit, Ut rectissime censuit Aristoteles." AN INTRODUCTORY ARGUMENT. 2$ hand the organ of the organs, 7 the active agent of the passive powers of the entire system ; and Desbarrolles has followed in his footsteps, when he has said, that like as man is a condensation of the universe, a microcosm, so is the hand a condensation of the man. Not only are " hands given us for our defence," 8 1 10. * . , , , Offensive and de but with weapons in our hands, and with our hands fensive f unc tions. alone, we can measure and regulate the force and extent of our defensive and offensive actions ; and it is by this power of regulation that we recognize the presence of what is known as a muscular sense, It is to this power of the regulation of force that Sir Charles Reg Bell refers, after alluding to that magnificent passage in the Odyssey, where Ulysses deliberates upon the Homer. force of the blow he deals to the beggar Irus, 9 saying : " By such arguments, I have been in the habit of show- ing that we possess a muscular sense ; and that, without Muscular sense. a perception of the condition of the muscles previous to the exercise of the will, we could not command them in standing, far less in walking, leaping, or running. And as for the hand, it is not more the freedom of its action which constitutes its perfection, than the knowledge which we have of these motions, and our 7 IIEPI ZfiflN MOPION BiX. A'., Ke. i."'R Si ftvai oi>x t>> fyyavov dXXA iro\\d' tffri 7d/> wffirfptl 6pyavov vpb dpydvuv." HOMER, IAIAS, Bt/3X. N'., 1. 813 : "'H Ofy ITOIJ roi Ov/jLbs MXirerai ta\airdeii>, vrjar &(f>ap Sf re x e i.ptveu' flffl ical TJ/UC." HOMER, OAT2SEIAS B./3X. 2'., 1. 90 : " AT) rbre fj.ep/j.ripi.j-e TroXi/rXos Stos '05i/orpovtoi>Tt Sodffffa.ro K^pSiov flvai, *H/c' Arfffot, 'ira /MJ piv tiruppaffffataT 'Axof. Aij rir dvocrxoyu^vw, 6 ptv fi\a.ff 5fibv Sifjio T Ipoj, 6 5' atix*"' ^XaffO'ei' fnr oCaros, 6ffrta 8'effftt %\0e Acori ar6/j.a QO'IVLOV al/ta'" etc. 26 CHEIROSOPHY. consequent ability to direct it with the utmost pre- cision." So it will be observed that among the lower animals the nearer approach to a hand that we find, the higher the grade of intelligence in the animal ; and Lucretius. this has been noted by both Lucretius and Cicero, who Cicero - point out the fact that the elephant has in its trunk the practical equivalent of the human hand. 10 T 11. One of the first points which obtrude themselves rfe hind.** th * u P n the student of anatomy is the absolute per- fection of the human hand as regards its construction, and the uses to which it is adapted. In no other combination of bones, muscles, and nerves, and in no other animal do we find a perfection which results in such superiority with regard to strength, variety, extent, and rapidity of motion ; and this perfection undoubtedly resulting from the intimate relations which exist between the hand and the intellect, we are irresistibly impelled to ask with Sir Charles Bell : Is it nothing to have our minds awakened to the perception of the numerous proofs of design which present themselves in the study of the hand, to be brought to the conviction that everything in its structure is orderly and systematic, and that the most perfect mechanism, the most minute and curious apparatus, and sensibilities the most delicate and appropriate, are all combined in operation that we Galen. may move the hand ? As Galen remarks : " Let us then scrutinize this member of the body and inquire, not simply whether it be in itself useful for all the purposes of life, and adapted to an animal endued with the highest intelligence, but whether its entire 10 LUCRETIUS, " De Rerum Natura," lib. ii., 1. 536 : " Sicut quadripedum cum primis esse videmus In genere anguimanus elephantos," etc j and CICERO, in his " De Natura Deorum," lib. ii., 123, says : " manus etiam data elephanto fsf," AN INTRODUCTORY ARGUMENT. 2/ structure be not such, that it could not be improved by any conceivable alteration." 11 A writer in the Anthropological Review [vol. iii., If 12. .-. . . ,- m/r T T> !_> i The hand as an 1865, p. 346], m a notice of Mr. R. Beamish s work rac e "The Psychonomy of the Hand" (London, 1865), makes the following extremely pertinent remarks : "We have given this subject more attention than the work under consideration deserves, because we think that the hand has been hitherto unwisely neglected as an index of race. ... It is very obvious that we have yet much to learn in this direction ; we want more facts; we have not yet the data which would warrant even a plausible hypothesis. . . . Let us endeavour to discover if there be ethnic character- istics attaching to the extremities as well as to the cranium ; let us first settle the great question of the racial hand, and then we shall be the better prepared to descend into the details of individual specialty." This writer had undoubtedly reason on his side, and I think that there is but very little ambiguity between the hands of various races at the present moment; we shall see, as we get further into the subject of Cheirognomy, how certain shapes of hands predomi- nate among the English, the Germans, and the French ; Engiish.German, and again, we shall notice the widely differing characteristics of the hands of meridional and septentrional, of oriental and occidental nations. Again, we shall see how different characters and mental calibres admire different shapes of hands, according to the characteristics which those shapes represent in Cheirognomy ; and, if evidence of this were required, we should find it in the preference 11 GALEN, Op. cit, lib. i., p. 4- "Agedum igitur, hanc ejus partem primam expendamus, non perscrutantes sit ne haec plane simpliciterque utilis, aut an sapienti animali conveniens, sed num cam omnino constitutionem habeat, qua meliorem aliam habere non potuit." CHEIROSOPHY. modern hands. Ancient and which the ancients showed for large hands [exemplified in all their statuary u ] as compared with the modern admiration for a small hand ; we shall see that a large hand is always an indication of force and power as opposed to the more spirituel disposition denoted by the possession of small hands. Thus it will have ^een appreciated that the hand is the most perfectly constructed and constituted member of the body, that it is the member most typical of the sentient soul of man, and that it is an organ eminently fitted for the expression and development of the highest human faculties. It is not surprising, therefore, that the symbols and symbolical actions in which we find the hand most prominent, are practically without number or limit; and that, in all times and in all countries, the hand has been accepted as the recognized embodiment of all force and intelligence. f 13. Construction of the hand. Symbols. 114. Symbolical expressions. The first point which will strike the student is the constant use of the word " hand " among the ancients to denote anything indicative of force or strength. 13 We find this in such phrases as x lp o-iS^pS, a grappling iron ; irpocripuv x"P a s> to a PPty f rc e ; \fipwv apx etv > to begin a fight ; xiipas ope^cu, to entreat ; lv xepvi, a close fight ; irpb xeipwv, at hand ; aaro ^etpos, off hand ; VTTO x ei P ? > under the power ; so also we find the words ^etpto?, subject to ; xctpo-Sunp^ assertion of right by force ; x fL P"n6' r )'>> submissive ; x 61 / 3 ^, I master or subjugate ; x^P^a, a conquest ; and a number of other Greek works into which the word \fip is introduced with the meaning of force or power. 12 It is probably in deference to this obvious preference that the restorer of the Apollo Belvidere gave to that unfortunate statue the dreadful hand which makes one shudder amid the beauties of the Octagon Court at the Vatican. 11 Witness also our modern expressions, " the hand of God" or "the finger of God," of the use of which, and of this use of the word " hand," there is no better example than the title of a compara- AN INTRODUCTORY ARGUMENT. 2Q Analogous to these is the old English expression ^f 15. with regard to size, height, or strength, such as we use Vt^Tword find it in passages of Shakespeare, as for instance, to denote force. " He is a tall man of his hands " [Merry Wives of Windsor, I., 4.], or, as referring to strength : " I'll swear to the Prince that thou art a tall fellow of thy hands" " I know thou art a tall fellow of thy hands " [Winter's Tale, V., 3.], and "I am a proper fellow of my hands " [Henry IVth., II.], and so on ad libitum. The symbols and customs connected with the f 18. Folding of the hand are as interesting as they are numerous, many hands in prayer of them being of religious import ; indeed, the most universal custom of folding the hands or of raising them in prayer being of the remotest antiquity. Aristotle refers to it, 14 and it undoubtedly has Aristotle, its origin in the symbolism that by folding the hands all power is surrendered by the person praying. It is for this reason that in Persia and in other Oriental Oriental customs. nations it is customary to fold or hide the hands in the presence of a superior, thus symbolizing an abrogation of the will. The giving of the hand has always been a token of 1 17. r . T , Giving of the peace and submission [whence arises, as I have men- hand tioned above, our custom of shaking hands] ; thus the bride gives her hand in the marriage ceremony in token of her submission to her husband, and in the middle ages part of the ceremony of the homage was the act of the feudatory placing his hands in those of the feudal lord or suzerain. In like manner we kiss the hands of princes in - , . . , Kissing hands. token of our submission to them, and we kiss the hands of fair women in acknowledgment of our lively recently published work : " La Main de 1'IIomme et le Doigt de Dieu dans les malheurs de la France," par J. C., Ex- aumonier dans 1'armee auxiliaire (Paris, 1871). 14 ARISTOTLE, HEPI K02MOT, Ke0. 71: -Ecu yip TrcWs ol &v0pwTTQi. avo.Tfivoit.ev rds XP 30 CHEIROSOPHY. allegiance. We all remember the exquisitely touch- Homer. ing account of how Priam in his pathetic appeal humbled himself to kiss the hands of Achilles, the murderer of his children, when begging him to restore the body of Hector. 15 In the earlier days of the church it was customary to kiss the hands of the bishops, Pliny. and later Pliny tells us that Cassar only allowed his hands to be kissed by persons of the higher ranks, the common people kissing their own hands on coming into his presence, as they did on entering their temples. , tne word signifying a vote being xpoi"ovia ; and up till a com- paratively late period, in our courts of law the prisoner, in pleading to an indictment, or a witness taking the oath, used to raise the right hand ; indeed, this custom still holds good in Scotland. To swear " by the hand " used to be a common enough form of Oaths, oath, and we find it continually repeated in one form or another in the works of Shakespeare, as, for Shakespeare, instance, in such passages as, " By these ten bones, my lords, he did speak " (2 Henry VL, Act I., sc. 3) ; " So do I still by these pickers and stealers " (Hamlet, Act III., sc. 2) ; " By this hand, I will supplant some of your teeth" (Tempest, Act III., sc. 2); and again, " By this hand, they are scoundrels and subtracters " (Twelfth Night, Act I., sc. 3) ; and the same formula occurs continually in the works of all the older dramatists. The ancients considered it to be the most terrible ^ 22 - punishment that they could inflict upon their enemies ^ n e c n ! t en f ^Sn to cut off one or both of their hands; and Xenophon off hands, and other authors tell us that after the battle of ^Egos Potami, Lysander condemned all the Athenian prisoners to death for having decreed that, should they win, all the prisoners they took should have 32 CHEIROSOPHY. their right hands cut off, Adimantos only being spared, because he had opposed this horrible decree in the Assembly; 18 and we find in the "De Bello Gallico" that, on one occasion, Caesar had the hands of all his Gaulish prisoners cut off, as an example to the other tribes. In like manner, after the siege of Numantia, Scipio Africanus. Scipio Africanus is said to have punished, by the amputation of their hands, four hundred of the in- habitants of the city of Lutea, for the assistance they had rendered the besieged. I have adverted above to the religious symbolisms connected with the hand ; the priest's blessing being Blessings, given with the whole hand, and the episcopal bless- ing being given with the thumb and first two fingers , only extended : and the reason of this is that The emblem of * the Trinity, these three represent the Trinity. The thumb is the representative of Unity in the Godhead ; and in old books on the Ritual we find it laid down that in baptism the cross is to be traced on the infant's fore- The first finger, head with the thumb (pollice). The first finger is the emblem of Christ as the Indicator of God's will, the great Revealer and Declarer of God's will to mankind, the only finger that can stand upright of itself alone. [So, too, with the heathen the first finger was taken to be the representative of the god Jupiter, and this is also adhered to (as we shall presently see) in Cheiro- The second mancy.] The second finger represents ecclesiastically finger. tne j^ o j y Q^ost, and in this manner the three fingers thus extended represent the Trinity in the episcopal Marriage service, blessing. We find this again in the marriage ser- vice in the placing of the ring [which used to be placed upon the thumb] on the third finger, the old practice being to place the ring first on the thumb, XENOPHON.'EAAHNIKON, B t j3\.B'., Ke<. & (31): "'E^- TavOa 8)j Karriyopfai tyiyvovro iroXXol rdv 'A.6r)i>aluv & re 4}5ij irapavfi>ofj.-/IKt(rav Kal & l^i^iVjuei'Oi TI xetpa. AiroKfareiv TUV faypiiOvTUi> vdiruv." AN INTRODUCTORY ARGUMENT. 33 then on the first finger, then on the second finger, and, lastly, to leave it on the third finger, in token that after his allegiance to God in the Trinity, man's whole and eternal allegiance is given to his wife ; the ring being the symbol of eternity. The thumb and two fingers thus extended are f 24. familiar to all of us from the little coral charms Hand - charms - fashioned on this wise which are worn by the Neapo- litans as a talisman against the jettatura or evil eye ; and I purchased, a short while since in Rome, a small silver hand whose fingers were thus arranged, and on various parts of which were stamped in relief various symbols, amongst which were a bust of Serapis, a knife, a serpent, a newt, a toad, a pair of scales, a tortoise, and a woman with a child. This talisman is known as the " Mano Pantea," and is an exact copy Mano Pantea. of one executed in bronze formerly in the Museo di Gian Pietro Bellori at Rome, and is said to be a most potent charm " contro del fascino." 19 As a matter of every day practice, the Neapolitan or the Sicilian averts the evil eye by means of what are known as Theevay e the Devil's Horns, i.e., the second and third fingers folded over the thumb, leaving the first and fourth fingers sticking out. The raising of the hands has always been re- ^25. cognized as a sign of peace and good faith, probablv Raisin s f *' * hands C^uesta mano esattamente imitata in piccola proporzione da quella di bronzo al naturale che gia era nel Museo di Gian Pietro Mane Panten. ellon in Roma, ed ora nonsi sa dove sia, masene ha il disegno nell' Opera del Grevio, vol. xii, page 763, donde fu ricavata. L alto delle dita e i simboli che la ricoprono cioe il busto di Serapide, divinita propizia agli uomini, il coltello, il serpe il ramarro, il rospo, la bilancia, la tartaruga, due vasi, la figura della donna col bambino, e un altro oggetto ignoto, formano un gruppo di simboli, che uniti insieme si credevano essere potenti a respingere gli effetti del fascino; e queste mani grandi lo nevano in casa per proteggerla contro ogni cattivo influsso della magia o del mal occhio, quelle piccole le portavano indosso per esserne difesi. 34 CHEIROSOPHY. Xenophon. 126. The Thumb. Gladiatorial shows. Contracts .Challenges. "Poltroons." from the fact that with the hands in the air the pro- babilities and possibilities of treachery or hostile demonstration, are minimised, and we have Xeno- phon's authority that this was also the case in the days when he lived. 20 The ancient Romans used to indicate whether they desired the life or the death of the fallen gladiator by hiding the thumb (premere pollicem), or by turning it downwards (vertere pollicem) ; and in many other ways the importance of the thumb has been recognized in ancient customs. Ducange tells us that the ancient formula on the execution of documents used to be in the middle ages, " Witness my thumb and seal ; " and even to-day, on the conclusion of a bargain in Ulster, the natives are wont to say, " We may lick thooms on that." To bite the thumb was in the middle ages equivalent to a challenge; thus we have it in the open- ing scene of Romeo andJuliet,\v\\Qre Sampson remarks, " I will bite my thumb at them ; which is a disgrace to them if they bear it," to which Abram exclaims, " Do you bite your thumb at us, sir ? " and the quarrel begins. In the classic ages cowards, who did not want to go to the war, cut off their thumbs so as to render it impossible for them to handle a sword ; and thus from the words pollice truncatus comes our word " poltroon," signifying coward. There are many superstitions connected with the hand, such as that one whereby the hand of a hung man was said to cure warts and tumours if stroked over the affected spot ; and a writer in Eraser's Magazine [vol. xxxvi., 1847, P- 2 93] te H s f this remedy having been applied to the neck of a woman at the execution of Dr. Dodd in 1777. Hazlitt also, in his edition of Brand's " Antiquities " [vide note 16 , " XENOPHON, KTPOT HAIAEIAS Bj/3\. A'., Kf>. /T. (17) : ** 'Ec TOVTOV irfnirci. rbv trtpov avr&v wpbs aurouj, 7r/>o0rcias (I fiiXot flfflv, ws rdxtffra viravrav raj fieas AN INTRODUCTORY ARGUMENT. 35 P- 3o], gives a more precise account of the same thing occurring at the execution of the murderer Crowley, at Warwick, in the year 1845. Most of my readers will know the "Hand of Glory" from having read the Hand of Glory Rev. R. H. Barham's " Ingoldsby Legend " of that name. The Hand of Glory was a talisman, apparently much used at one time for the commission of bur- glaries, for its properties were [we are told] that it would open closed doors, and when presented to people would deprive them of all power to move, though they might be awake ; it was invisible to all except to him who held it, and prevented sleeping people from waking : as " Ingoldsby " hath it : - i ngo idsby. " Now open lock, to the Dead Man's knock ! Fly bolt and bar and band ! Nor move nor swerve, joint, muscle, or nerve, At the spell of the dead man's hand ! Sleep all who sleep ! Wake all who wake ! But be as the dead for the Dead Man's sake ! " A full receipt [with an illustration] for the preparation of the Hand of Glory from the right hand of a man who has been hung in chains at a cross road, and for the composition of the candle to be held by it, may be found at page 104 of "Les Secrets du Petit Albert." 21 Thus it will be seen from the above selected ^[28. specimens that the symbolisms and superstitions Volume f connected with the hand are practically without number, and prove the effect which the uses and perfection of the hand produce in the most en- lightened, as well as in the most ignorant minds. Let us, therefore, turn to the examination of the physical construction of this marvellous and perfectly constituted member. ' Secrets merveilleux de la magic naturelle et cabalistique du Petit Albert" (Lyons, 1776). 36 CHEIROSOPHY. ^ 29. It would be impossible, as it would be inexpedient Physiology of an( j unnecessary, to embark in this place upon a long the hand. , . , dissertation concerning the anatomy, physiology, and histology of the human hand ; interesting as the subject is, I must refer my readers to the perusal of such books Owen. as Sir Richard Owen, " On the Nature of Limbs " Humphry. [London, 1849], or Humphry, "On the Human Foot and Human Hand " [Cambridge and London, 1861]; but it will not, I think, be out of place if I note here some of the physiological features of this perfect Aristotle. member, which, as Aristotle says, is not part of another member, but is a perfect whole divided into parts like any other member. 22 f SO. It will be my object to show that the hand is not a The hand is a mere appendage, but is intimately connected with the distinct member. entire frame ; and to prove the statement of Sir Charles Bell, " That the hand is not a thing put on to the body like an additional movement to a watch, but that a thousand intricate relations must be established throughout the whole frame in connection with it ; not only must appropriate nerves of motion and of sensation, and a part of the brain having correspond- ence with those nerves be supplied, but unless, with all this superadded organisation, a propensity to put it into operation were created, the hand would lie inactive." ^31. The exquisite composition and mechanism of the C Tend! f hand has been summed up thus by Professor Sir Richard Owen. 23 : "The high characteristics of the human hand and arm are manifested by the subordi- nation of each part to a harmonious combination of ARISTOTLE, IIEPI TA ZA 'I2TOPION, B t /3\. d., Ke^.d: " ToCra yap a&rd T' iarl fJ.tpt) 6'\a, teal Iffriv afirwv i-repa fj-opia. Hdvra. 5 ra dvofj.oiofj.fpT] avyKeirat K rCiv 6/j.oioficpwv, olov %elp K ffapKOS KO.I VfVpUV KO.I dffTUV. M RICHARD OWEN, "On the Nature of Limbs. A discourse delivered on Friday, Feb. 9 [1849], at an evening meeting of the Royal Institution of Great Britain," p. 36 (London, 1849). AN INTRODUCTORY ARGUMENT. 37 function with another, by the departure of every ele- ment of the appendage from the form of the simple ray, and each by a special modification of its own ; so that every single bone is distinguishable from another; each digit has its own peculiar character and name; and the ' thumb,' which is the least impor- tant and constant of the five divisions of the appen- dage in the rest of the class, becomes in man the most important element of the terminal segment, and that which makes it a 'hand,' properly so called." 24 Let us take a rapid survey of the bones of the hand. At the ends of the radius and ulna [the two bones of The bones of tht the fore-arm] we find in the human skeleton the carpal hani bones, which, being eight in number [scaphoid, semi- lunar, cuneiform, pisiform, trapezium, trapezoid, mag- num, and unciform], and fitted closely into one another, compose the wrist. Beyond these we have the five metacarpal bones, which supply the framework of the palm ; and above these again, the three rows of pha- langes which constitute the fingers and the two phalanges which constitute the thumb. H Speaking of the feet, and contrasting the toes with the fingers, Professor Owen continues : " In the pelvic, as in the scapular Owen on the extremity, the same digit [the thumb], which is the first to be foot- rejected in the mammalian series, becomes, as it were, the 'chief stone of the corner,' and is termed, far excellence, ' the great toe ; ' and this is more peculiarly the characteristic of the genus Homo than even its homotype the thumb ; for the monkey has a kind of pollex on the hand, but no brute animal presents that development of the hallux on which the erect posture and gait of man mainly depend.' Galen, also, in his work "De Usu Partium corporis humani" [book ii.], remarks on this very point : " Quare autem non, sicut digiti pedum, ex uno ordine siti sunt omncs, sed magnus est aliis oppositus, dictum quidem est et hoc, sed quantum deest nunc adjicietur. Pes quidem amubulandi organum fuit, manus autem apprehendi. Conveniebat autem illi quidem firmationis securitas; huic autem apprehensionis multiformitas. Sed formationis quidem securitas in uno ordine locatis indigebat omnibus digitis, promptittdo vero ad varie- tatem acceptionum, magno, id est pollice indiget aliis opposite." 38 CHEIROSOPHY. 33. The importance of a thorough comprehension of P tomy. V of that comp li cated p l eX US of nerves which gives to the hand its direct and con- stantly apparent connection with the brain. There are more nerves in the hand than at any other point of the body, 30 and in the palm they are more nume- rous than at any other point of the hand. It is this that " ' A?r6 TWV cb^/now aun&ruv, a.irpovl>i)Tov KO\ rvxalav ^6i>TUv t> Kivrtffiv. EPICURUS, "Physica et Meteorologica " (J. G. Schneider: Leipsic, 1813). * Aristotle calls attention to this in his IIEPI TA ZOA'ISTO- AN INTRODUCTORY ARGUMENT. 45 causes the feeling of revulsion and of sickness which ensues, when the palms of the hands or the soles of Elementary the feet are tickled ; it is by reason of this that in fever the hands become burning hot, whilst the rest of the body, which is more muscular than nervous [as opposed to the hands, which are more nervous than muscular], is cold ; and the hands and feet become numbed by cold or fear sooner than the rest of the body, by reason of the high development of the vaso- motor nerve arrangements in them, added to the circumstances of their rich blood-supply, distance from the heart and delicate skin covering, thus showing that the hand acts as the thermometer, so to speak, of the life. Without the hand, principal seat as it is of the ^40. SENSE OF TOUCH, the other senses would be com- '""^J^ paratively useless ; the sense of Touch is the only sense its superiority, which is reciprocal [In the sense referred to by Sir Walter Scott, where he alludes to the sensations pro- duced by touching one's own body unconsciously. :0a ] That is, though the senses of Sight, Hearing, Taste, and Smell, can only receive impressions without giving them, that of Touch both receives and gives ; and it is this sense of Touch, dependent as it is upon the nervous system, which is the most important of all, and which is found in its highest state of development where that ner- vous system is the most complete, namely, in the hand. I cannot, I think, do better than follow the prin- If 41. ciples upon which Bernstein discusses the physiology ^f^Sf,/ of the sense of Touch, as an introduction to this section touch. Bernstein of my argument/ 1 Every sensory organ may be shown PI ON, where he says, Bi/3X. T'., Kf>. 4. : "ILXeurra Start reCpa ff pi rods ir65os KOI raj x e 'P aj * a * rXevpiif Kal cfyiorXdraj Kal repl ri>v ai/xtva. Kal irtpl TOI>S f)paxtovcu." 308 SIR WALTER SCOTT, "Letters to J. G. Lockhart on Demonology and Witchcraft" (London, 1830), Letter I. " JULIUS BERNSTEIN, " The Five Senses of Man" (London, 1883), 4th Edition. 46 CHEIROSOPHY. to be anatomically connected with the nervous system by means of nerve trunks and nerve fibres. Touch, sight, hearing, smell, and taste are inconceivable without the presence of a nervous system, even if the sensory organs were in their present full develop- ment [e.g., an arm of which the nerve is injured can feel nothing], the sensation itself evidently first takes place in the brain \e.g. t the sensation of light does not take place in the eye, where there is only an impres- sion of light upon the expanded surface of the optic nerve ; the sensation of light cannot, however, take place in the optic nerve itself, for it merely conveys the fact of the existence of the irritation to the brain], Of all the senses the most perfect is undoubtedly that of Touch, and though it is very greatly assisted by that of Sight, still, the former can dispense with the latter far better than the latter with the former. The simultaneous action of the sensations of touch and sight is, in fact, for the human mind an important source of knowledge in the external world. Yet we must not on this account conclude that the sense of Touch alone, without the assistance of sight [as in the case of persons born blind], cannot lead to knowledge. It is probable that the sense of touch alone might enable us to distinguish our own body and external objects sooner than vision. For the act of touching our body with our hand calls forth a double sensation of touch, one through the hand, and the other through the part of the skin touched, whilst touching an external object causes only a single sensation of touch through the tactile organ. ^ 42. And it must be remembered that the sense of Touch rf^aul!' 1011 is our great bodil y safeguard, for it produces the sensation of pain [as distinguished from that of contact], which warns us to fly from the agent which produces that sensation. The limit between the sensations of touch and pain may be illustrated by AN INTRODUCTORY ARGUMENT. 47 the following example given by Ernst Heinrich Weber. 32 If we place the edge of a sharp knife on the skin, we feel the edge by means of our sense of Touch and pain touch ; we perceive a sensation, and refer it to the contrasted. object which caused it. But as soon as we cut the skin with the knife we feel pain, a feeling which we no longer refer to the cutting knife, but which we feel within ourselves, and which communicates to us the fact of a change of condition in our own body ; by the sensation of pain we are not able to recognise with the same degree of accuracy either the object which caused it, or its nature. Let us then examine this sense of Touch, and f 4S. particularly let us examine it with regard to the part which the hand plays in its development. We know from experience that every part of our skin possesses a certain sensibility, and that this sensibility varies in different parts. This property is given to the skin by a great number of nerves which originate in the brain and spinal cord, and extend in a tree- like form over the body. The sensibility of any part of the body is due to these nerves alone, for, as soon as such a nerve is lost or diseased, the part of the body supplied by it becomes void of sensation. And this sense of touch may be said to be the only universal sense; for, as Aristotle and Cuvier have both The s ^ ers remarked in parallel passages which are quoted by Aristotle. Dr. Kidd [vide note 4 , p. 21], that of the five senses, touch alone is common to all animals, and is so generally diffused over the whole body that it does not [like the other senses] reside in any specific part alone. All animals do not possess all the senses some possess only a part of them ; but no animal is n ERNST HEINRICH WEBER, "De pulsu, resorptione auditd et tactu annotationes anatomicae et physiologies " (Lipsiae, 1834), 4to. 48 CHEIROSOPHY. without the sense of touch. 33 And the sense of touch does not only determine size, shape, and pressure ; it alone of all the senses can appreciate differences of temperature, heat and cold. The two great senses, therefore, which reside in louch tne gkj n are those of touch and of temperature. In ana temperature. touching a body we employ the organs best adapted for the purpose, namely the hands ; and we can re- cognise the object touched with closed eyes, with more or less certainty; in the hands this power is very perfect, and is the more perfect the nearer we approach to the tips of the fingers, where the skin is the most sensitive. 84 ^ 46. The skin itself consists of three layers. Upon the its composition. ce ^ u ' ar tissue under the skin lies the first skin [or dertnis\ t which is of a tolerably compact nature. Its surface consists of a greater or less number of cylindrical or conical protuberances, which are called papillae. Upon the dermis lies the mucous layer, which consists of a great number of small microscopic cells, M ARISTOTLE, HEPI TA ZQA'ISTOPION, B t/ 3X. A'., Ketf.. -f,.-. " E&rl 8' a! (alaO^aeii) TrXeiorcu KO! Trap as ovStjjla Qalve-rcu (Sios irtpa, irtvre rbv dpiOfriv, 6if/is, d/corj, 6ffpi)ffis, yevffis, di?i. . . . 'Of yap 6/j.oiws irdffiv vTrdpxovffu>, (alff6-/iffeis~) dXXd TOIS yuv irdffai rotj 8'eXaTTOvj. 1j]v 5 -ir^irrijv alffdi] T^V dr)v Ka\ov^vrjv Kal r'dXXa irair' ?x f ' fv a - " " Hoat St rots fyotj (LiffOijffis fiia inrdpxti Koivij fj.6n) TJ d(f>i] &crre Kal tv $ (aih-i)) fjiopty yivtcrOai vtyvKtv dvdivvfidv tffTiv." Bt/3X. A'., Ki dv\os, ol 8' &\\oi SiK6vSv\oi. 'H 8^ va/x^ts ical T$ Ppax'tovt Kai rif. 8aKTU\if> tvrbs iraaw Ka^irrerat Bt fipayi wv Kara rb u\tKpavov. Xfip&s St rb fj.tv tvrbs Otvap, ffapuwSes KO.I Sirtprj^vov ApOpois, TO?S fth naxpofiiois M $ Svffl 81 S\ov, TOIS 8^ ftpaxvpiois Sval /cat ov 81 S\ov. "Apdpa 82 x fl P^ Ka ^ fipa-'xiovQ* Kapirus. T6 5^ tw rijs wdes KCLI dci6vu / uo'." HPOBAHMATQN AA', i : "Atd ri foot rty 8i&x.cip&<: TO^V 81 8\r)s, fnaKpo^idtraroi ; 'H St&ri rd &t>apOpa fipaxtfita Kal AN INTRODUCTORY ARGUMENT. 6 1 movable types were used, was on the subject of Cheiromancy, that the inestimably valuable "block book," "Die Kunst Ciromantia," written by Hartlieb Hartiieb [whose portrait Miss Horsley has given us as our frontispiece], was written in 1448, and printed at Augsburg in the year I475- 57 Aristotle was not the only classical author who f 60. recognized the important functions of the hand. Quin- Quu tilian refers to its expressive powers in several places, both as regards the use made of it by deaf and dumb persons, and as regards the multiplicity of things that may be expressed by its means, notably in the pas- sage where he says : " For though many parts of the body assist speech, the hands may be said actually to speak themselves, for do we not with the hands "^^J demand, entreat, call, dismiss, threaten, abhor, fear, interrogate, deny," etc.; M and it is probably from this passage that Montaigne in his " Apologie de Raimond Montaigne. Sebond" derives his celebrated passage : " What about hands ? We request, promise, call, dismiss, threaten, entreat, supplicate, deny, refuse, interrogate, *' JOHANN HARTLIEB, " Die Kunst Ciromantia," printed at Augsburg, 1475. 68 " M. FABU QUINCTILIANI "De Institutione Oralona Libn duodccim " (Oxford, 1693), lib. XL, cap. iii. " De Gestu in Pro- nunciando," p. 578. " Quippe non manus solum sed nutus etinm declarant nostram voluntatem, et in mutis pro sermone sunt," p. 581. " Manus vero, sine quibus trunca esset actio ac debilis, vix dici potest quot motus habeant, cum pene ipsam verborum copiam persequantur : nam ceterae partes loquentem adjuvant, hie (prope est ut dicam) ipsae loquuntur. An non his poscimus ? pollicemur? vocamus ? dimittimus ? minamur ? supplicamus ? abominamur? timemus? interrogamus ? negamur? gaudium tri- stitiam, dubitationem, confessionem, prenitentiam, modum, co- piam, numerum, tempus ostendimus? Non eadem concitant? supplicant ? inhibent ? probant ? admirantur ? verecundantur ? Non in demonstrandis locis atque personis.. adverbiorum atque pronominum obtinent vicem ? ut in tanta per omnes gentes nationesque linguae diversitate, hie mihi omnium hominum com- munis sermo videatur, " etc. 62 CHEIROSOPHY. admire, numerate, confess, repent, fear, . . . and what not ? we find a variety and multiplication which might well be the envy of the tongue " ; 59 and further on, in the same chapter, he expressly names cheiromancy, giving a few of its indications and adding : " I call you yourself to witness whether with this science a man may not pass with reputation and favour in every company." 60 In France, besides Montaigne, Honore De Balzac, de Balzac has given great attention to the subject. Theophile Gautier calls special attention to the fact in his work, " Honor de Balzac" (Paris, 1860, p. 165), and certainly we find long passages on the science in Balzac's "Come'die Humaine," 61 to which I beg particularly to refer the reader, and in the course of His arguments which he remarks : " To foretell to a man the events for Cheirosophy. o f n i s ijf e ^ f rom tne as p e cts of his hand, is not a thing * "Essaisde Montaigne, suivis de sa correspondance et de la servitude volontaire d'Estienne de la Boetie," etc. (Paris, 1854) ; " Apologiede Raimond Sebond,"vol. ii., p. 282, book ii.,ch. xii.: " Quoy des mains ? nous requerons, nous promettons, appelons, congedions, mena9eons, prions, supplions, nions, refusons, inter- rogeons, admirons, nombrons, confessons, repentons, craignons, vergoignons, doubtons, intruisons, commandons, incitons, en- courageons, jurons, tesmoignons, accusons, condamnons, absolvons, injurions, mesprisons, desfions, despitons, flattens, applaudissons, benissons, humilions, mocquons, reconcilions, recommendons, exaltons, festoyons, resjoui'ssons, complaignons, attristons, des- confortons. desesperons, estonnons, escrions, taisons, et quoy non ? d'une variation et multiplication, a 1'envy de la langue." " " II ne fault S9avoir que le lieu de Mars loge au milieu du triangle de la main, celuy de Venus au poulce, et de Mercure au petit doigt ; et que quand la mensale coupe le tubercle de Ten- seigneur, c'est signe de cruaute ; quand elle fault soubs le mitoyen et que la moyenne naturelle faict un angle avecques la vitale soubs mesme endroict, que c'est signe d'une mort miserable, etc. Je vous apelle vous mesme a tesmoing, si avecques cette science un homme ne peult passer, avec reputation et faveur, parmy toutes compaignies." OP. CIT., ch. xii., p. 470, vol. ii. 81 Alphonse Pages, " Pensees de Balzac extraites de la Comedie Humaine " (Paris, 1866), livre v., La Societe ; cap. vi., " Sciences Occultes." AN INTRODUCTORY ARGUMENT. 63 more strange for him who has the qualities of a seer, than it is to tell a soldier that he will fight, a cobbler that he will make shoes, or an agriculturist that he will dress and work the soil." And again he says : " Many sciences have issued from the occult ones, and their illustrious discoverers have made only one mistake, which is that they try to reduce to a system isolated examples, of which the creative cause has not yet been able to be analysed." The passages are too long to transcribe [even as notes] in this place; but I warmly recommend them to my readers. It is not necessary to multiply authorities. What I have given above will carry their own weight ; and now, before recapitulating the claims of the science to our consideration, I should like to say a few words on the astrological aspect of the subject As to the nomenclature which has been adopted for the mounts, I have explained its object in another place [vide 1[ 371] ; what I wish particularly to notice here are the astrologic explanations which have been, by many writers, advanced for the establishment of the science, with a few words on their arguments in sup- port of the hypothesis, and my own view of the matter. Much has been said [though little has been de- f 62. finitely known] for and against the influence of the JJSTi sun, moon, and planets upon the earth and the people earth, inhabiting it. The question seems to turn upon the existence of a connecting link which joins us to them, a connecting fluid, the principal function of which is the transmission of their light and heat to our globe : and this connecting fluid is what is known as cether. .fither. The problem of the existence in all space of a fluid called aether or its non-existence was first enunciated by Zuglichen van Huyghens [nat. 1619, ob. 1693], ^^ who was the first to propound the undulatory as 64 CHEIROSOPHY. opposed to the molecular theory of light, which latter was the then generally accepted theory of Newton. Van Huyghens took from the analogy of sound in air and waves in water the idea of the existence in all space of a highly elastic [quasi-solid] fluid, provision- ally termed cether, and started the now well-known Unduiatory and accepted hypothesis that light consists of the pro- t eory o ig t. p a g at j on o f waves m this fluid. The hypothesis also requires that the vibrating medium should possess properties more nearly allied to those of an elastic solid than those of a vapour or gas. ^[63. These two theories [the undulatory and the mole- Th vekTed **' cu ' ar ] were pretty evenly balanced in scientific and Young. popular estimation, until in 1802 Dr. Young, by his discovery of the laws of the interference of light, turned the scale in favour of the undulatory as against Fresnei. the molecular theory. Twelve years later, Fresnel [between 1814 and 1819], in ignorance, it is said, of the labours of Young, " demonstrated to his country- men the error of the Newtonian theory of the propagation of light by the emission of material particles, and ably advocated the undulatory hypo- thesis." 62 This is, I think, all that need be said in proof of a connecting quasi-solid matter or fluid beyond the atmosphere in which the entire solar system floats, a fluid sufficiently ponderable to resist the passage of comets, and consequently of transmitting to us the influences of the moon and stars, influences sufficiently demonstrated by the phenomena of tides, without going into their influence upon certain persons in various conditions of mind and body. ** A full account of the discoveries of Fresnel in this connection may be found in the " CEuvres Completes d' Augustin Fresnel, publiees par les soins du Ministre de 1'Instruction Publique " (Paris, 1866), at p. 247 of vol. i. of which will La found No. XIV., " Mdmoire sur la diffraction de la lumiere, couronn^ par I 1 Academic des Sciences, 1819," in which Memoire his studies and their results on this point are fully set forth. AN INTRODUCTORY ARGUMENT. 65 " If therefore," says Daubenay, in one of his speeches Q$ before the Royal Society, " the direction of a rod of Daubenay. steel hung a few feet from the earth can, as has been proved by Colonel Sabine, be influenced by the position Co lonel Sabine'i of a body like the moon situate 200,000 miles [mean experiments, distance 238,750 miles] from our planet, who can accuse of extravagance the belief of the ancient astrologers in the influence of planets on the human system ? " And if the heavenly bodies can act through two hundred and odd thousand miles of that connecting fluid or aether, on an inanimate object like a piece of steel, why should they not act, and act so strongly as to influence our whole lives, on so sensitive, so impressionable a sub- stance as that imponderable nerve fluid [vide [[ 49] which is our life, our sense, our very soul ? But we are going further than I intended ; the ^ 65. astrologers who laid down the hard-and-fast rule that ***<*asi our existences are directed by the states and positions of the planets at the time of our birth, seem to have passed over the influences of parentage as being im- material, and take into no account the physical effects of the mental and physiological conditions of our progeni- tors. And again, they err who say that all things here- ditary are inevitable for the reason that we do not choose our own parents, because in a manner they are chosen choice of parenti for us ; that is to say, our parentage is pre-ordained, for it is the inevitable and continual march of events which gives us our ancestors, and, as a matter of fact, our parents, the time of our birth, and many of the other influences of our lives are merely the results of th* natural sequence of certain already established facts, lo Sequence of the examination of which the ancient astrologers devoted their lives with such assiduity. Turn, if this seems incomprehensible to you, to the opening lines of Dugald Stewart's immortal work: 63 "All the different Dugald Stewart B DUGALD STEWART, " Outlines of Moral Philosophy," 6th d., 1837. 5 66 CHEIROSOPHY. kinds of philosophical inquiry, and all that practical knowledge which guides our conduct in life, pre- suppose such an established order in the succession of events as enables us to form conjectures concern- ing the future from the observation of the past." Philosophy, therefore, aims at ascertaining the esta- blished conjunctions which, in their turn, establish the order of the universe; the result of possible com- binations of future events become known to us by means of those artificial combinations of present cir- cumstances which are known to us by the name of experiments; and as Dugald Stewart, in the same work, has remarked : " Knowledge of the laws of nature is to be attained only by experiment, for there is no actual connection between two events which enable us to form an a priori reasoning. 64 \yide \ 89 and 90.] ^ 66. Herbert Spencer, in his " Study of Sociology " Herbert Spencer. [London, 1873], deals very ably and interestingly with this point in his chapter [II.], entitled, " Is there a Social Science," at the end of which he says : " In brief, then, the alternative positions are these. On the Tl rlturai f one hand, if there is no natural causation throughout causation. the actions of incorporated humanity, government and legislation are absurd. Acts of Parliament may, as well as not, be made to depend on the drawing of lots or the tossing of a coin ; or rather, there may as well be none at all ; social sequences having no ascertain- able order, no effect can be counted upon ; everything is chaotic. On the other hand, */ there is natural causation^ then the combination of forces by which 64 Balzac says on this point : " Que certains etres aient le pouvoir d'apercevoir les fails a venir dans le germe des causes, comme le grand inventeur ape^oit une Industrie, une science, dans un effet naturel inapercu du vulgaire ; ce n'est plus une de ces violentes exceptions qui font rumeur, c'est 1'effet d'une faculte re- conntte, etqui serait en quelque sorte le sonnambulisme de 1'esprit. Si done cette proposition, sur laquelle reposent les differentes jpanieres de dechiffrer 1'avenir, semble absurde, le fait est 14." AN INTRODUCTORY ARGUMENT. 67 every combination of effects is produced, produces that combination of effects in conformity with the laws of the forces. And if so, it behoves us to use all dili- gence in ascertaining what the forces are, what are their laws, and what are the ways in which they co-operate" Thus, therefore, it is not in any way absurd to study . the atmospheric, the meteorologic, or, if you will have Natal influen c it so, the astrologic conditions under which a man is born, and under which his parents have lived, in making a probable forecast of the tendencies and even of the events which will signalize his life; but in all, and through all, we must bear in mind the thought which Desbarrolles has embodied in this striking sentence : Desbarroi'.a. " The influence of the planets is incontestable ; but what is still more incontestable is the universal and all-powerful action of a Being supremely pre-eminent, who rules and governs the stars, the heavens, the visible and the invisible worlds, unlimited space, and the immensity of the universe. This Being, whom our dazzled reason cannot conceive, this Being whom our reason adores, but to whom it dares not give a name, has been named by mortals God." 65 The astrologic cheiromant lays down as an axiom - that the lines and formations which exist in a hand at Astral lines. the moment of birth are purely astral, are produced by the influences of planets which have been at work up to that moment, and that it is the action of the brain-development which modifies them afterwards. The physiological cheiromant, on the other hand [and 65 ADRIEN DESBARROLLES : " Les influences des astres sont incontestables ; mais ce qui est plus incontestable encore, c'est 1'action universelle et tout-puissante d'un etre eminemment superieur, qui re"git les astres, les cieux, les mondes visibles, les mondes invisibles, les espaces sans bornes, 1'immensite ! Get etre, que notre raison eblouie ne peut concevoir, cet 6tre qu'elle adore et auquel elle n'ose donner un nom, les hommes 1'ont appele Dieu." " Les Mysteres de la Main, re've'les et expliques ' (Paris, 1859). 68 CHEIROSOPHY. to this opinion I incline myself], considers rather that the tendencies of a man's nature are the result of his ante-natal and ancestral circumstances, that it is these tendencies that mould the formations of his hands, and that the events and characteristics of his life may be ex- plained and foretold oy a careful study of those causes [i.e., those tendencies] based upon experiences which, in these cases, do duty for experiments. The whole question, therefore, of the astral inftu- ultimate ences, with regard to the science of Cheirosophy, proximate cause, resolves itself into a consideration of the ultimate and proximate cause, and my view of the case is this : Let us firmly establish and recognise the proximate cause [i.e., the physical conditions and ante-natal circumstances of man], before we begin to search for the ultimate cause, [i.e., the forces and influences which have caused those physical conditions and ante-natal circumstances] ; let us fully understand our physical position, before we soar away into speculations [for mere speculations they must be] as to our psychical position : to my mind, the main obstacle to the proper elucidation of such problems as these, is nothing more or less than the fact that investigators are ever prone to attempt to explain psychical problems [which depend naturally upon physical ones], before they have thoroughly examined the physical conditions which must lead to that ex- planation. This, then, is my position as regards astrology in connection with Cheirosophy : let us clearly understand, what is clearly capable of com- prehension, before we speculate on ultimate causes, concerning which we can, in our present condition, and with our present means of information, know little or nothing. Let us wait and study patiently : Alexandra "La Chiromancie," says Alexandre Dumas fils, " sera un mas fiu g ramma ; re de 1'organisation humaine," AN INTRODUCTORY ARGUMENT. 69 We reach now the final, [and perhaps the most f 70. important] point of this argument. I wish to conclude Final "S"" as briefly as possible [for my arguments have un- consciously been extended] with a few of the considerations connected with the actual science of Cheirosophy, which entitle it to the most careful and universal study ; which fully demonstrate the value of its indications, and which establish its claims to rank as an exact science : my principal difficulty will be to confine myself to a statement of the more important points, so as to avoid losing the point of my argument, in the diffuseness of its treatment. And, firstly, let me deal with that branch of argu- f 71. ment, which ridicules the idea of seeking in the human ,^3L. hand the indications of the human character. \Videpost IfH 7 8 * and 96.] There are but few people who will disagree with me at the outset, if I lay down the pro- position, that no two characters are absolutely identical, any more than two faces, or two methods and manners of speech are so. Bearing this in mind, it is inter- esting and pertinent to note that no pair of hands are exactly alike : indeed, we may go further and say that it is impossible to find two pairs of hands which do not exhibit very striking and plainly marked differences, both as regards their forms and shapes, and as regards the markings found therein. 66 The Chinese have a system of divination by f 72. the examination of the impression left by the ball w^ of the thumb upon a piece of soft wax, or from the The ciuncc. oval figure which may be traced from it upon a piece of paper, using the thumb as a die, and daubing it with ink. It is a matter of common knowledge that the spiral and convoluted figures, produced by any * "II y a autant de diversite et de dissemblance entre le< formes des mains, qu'il y en a entre les Physionomies " T. C. LAVATER, " L'Art de connaitre les hommes par la mie" (Paris, 1806), vol. ill, p. I. 7O CHEIROSOPHY. unlimited number of thumbs, will all present some difference one from another. It is true that, as Aristotle. Aristotle says : " In some animals there is a mutual resemblance in all their parts ; as, the eye of any one Homogeneity, man resembles [in construction] the eye of every other man ; for in individuals of the same species, each part resembles its correspondent part, as much as the whole resembles the whole ; " G7 and so it is of the hand, i.e., every hand resembles its fellows in that [barring the cases of deformities] it has a thumb, four fingers, a palm, and so on ; but the composition and formation of those parts of the member, differ invari- ably, and ad infinitum; and here we have two most Vnatogy between pertinent and leading facts, that, like as all dispositions hands. are different, so all hands are different; and who shall accuse of absurdity the proposition, that these two facts may bear a very close relationship to one another? And, as we have seen that the arrange- ments of veins and nerves in a hand vary indefinitely [vide * 38], may not the constitutional [the construc- tional] variations thereby indicated be the first step towards the explanation of those differences of character, which trace themselves at the point where the actual mechanical arrangement shows the greatest variation, and that is in the hand ? 1 73. From the paw of a dog, you can tell what sort of bC aspects! y cnase ne w i'l be most useful for ; from the shape of a horse's hoof, you can tell his breed, and the kind of work to which he is best adapted. Why, therefore, should we not be able to tell from the hand of man what are his principal occupations, and the consequent tendencies of his nature ? To carry this argument a 67 ARISTOTLE, IIEPI TA ZflA'ISTOPION, BiX. d., Ke0.. d: " "Ex S r&v fyaw fvia fj.ii> irdvra TO. fj.opia r'avra aXXfaots^via. 6 Hrepa.. T'ai/rd 5 rd. p.tv eiSet rGiv fj.opiwv fcrrlv, olov (nvdpdoTrov pis teal 60a\fibs &v9pwTrov pivl Kal 6gny- t ^ e h ant j nas jj- s physiognomy like the face, only, as this particular physiognomy reflects only the immov- able basis of the intelligence, it has all the immobility of a material symbol. Mirror of the sensations of the soul, of the heart, of the senses, and of the spirit, the physiognomy of the face has all the charms of variety ; but, as to a certain extent, it may be dominated by the will ; nothing can guarantee to us the truth of its revelations, whilst the hand preserves invariably the same expression, whatever it may be, of our natural be Balzac, bent ; " 68 and Balzac, in the work I have recently quoted, has been struck by the same thing; for he says : " We acquire the faculty of imposing silence upon our lips, upon our eyes, upon our eyebrows, and upon our forehead; the hand does not dissemble, and no feature is more expressive than the hand. 69 The hand has a thousand ways of being dry, moist, burning, icy, soft, hard, unctuous, it palpitates, it perspires, it hardens, it softens. In fact, it presents an inexplicable phenomenon that one is tempted to name the incarna- w D'ARPENTIGNY, "La Science de la Main" (Paris, 1865), p. 94. !a The physiognomist Lavater, in the work I have already quoted, Note 6 * ) p. 69, continues the passage I have there noticed by saying : " La mam est . . . un object de la physionomie, un objet d'autant plus significatif, et d'autant plus irappant parce-que la main ne peut pas dissimuler, et que sa mobilite le trahit a chaque instant. Je dis qu'elle ne peut pas dissimuler, car 1'hypocrite le plus raffine, le fourbe le plus exerce, ne saurait alterer ni la forme, ni les contours, ni les proportions, ni les muscles de sa main, ou seulement d'une section de sa main ; il ne saurait la soustraire aux yeux de 1'observatcur qu'en la ' cachant tout-a- fait," AN INTRODUCTORY ARGUMENT. 75 tion of thought. ... In all ages sorcerers have tried to read our destiny in the lines which are in no way fantastic or meaningless, and which correspond with the principles of the life and of the character." And we may here call attention to the point, and I have noticed it in another place [If 108] that the Cheiro- gnomy, the shapes of a hand, are very frequently hereditary, whilst the lines of the palm become traced by the other and more exterior influences to which I have already alluded. Then, as regards the superiority of phrenology, here again I beg leave to differ ; by calling attention to the points that in that science it is very easy to mistake the position of a bump, or to ascribe to it an erroneous signification by reason of its displacement, and that by reason of the growth of the hair it is difficult to put into practice, and indeed, cannot be exercised without the consent of the subject, whereas in Cheirosophy the positions of the formations are much more clearly defined, and every displacement of a line r mount carries with it its own particular signification, whilst it can be put into operation without the consent or even the know- ledge of the subject of your scrutiny. " It is the word ' absurd ' " (says Balzac), " which condemned steam, which condemns to-day aerial navi- gation, which condemned the inventions of gunpowder, of printing, of spectacles, of engraving, and the more recent discovery of photography. . . . Very well then, if God has traced for certain clear-sighted beings the destiny and character of every man in his physio- gnomy [taking this word to mean the whole expression of the body], why should not the hand resume in itself the whole of the science of physiognomy, seeing that the hand represents human action in its entirety, and its only mode of manifesting itself? And thus we attain to Cheiromancy." [" Comedie Humaine," book V., cap. vi.] Heredity of Cheirognomy. f W. Ridicule. fe Balzac. 76 CHEIROSOPHY. It must not, however, be thought that I object, in Value of sceptic fae slightest degree, to the scepticism with which the arguments. . science is frequently received ; on the contrary, the sceptic acts towards Cheirosophy in the relation that darkness bears to light, i.e., it brings it into prominence, and, indeed, is the main evidence of its existence ; for, as without shadow, light could not be proved to exist, so without scepticism the truths of Cheirosophy would be lost in the unquestioned presence of their evident and eminent reality. [80. In all my arguments on this science I have strenu- Evils of ously endeavoured to avoid that irritation and impa- tmpatience in _ argument. tience which is too often the inseparable concomitant of argument. "Along with the irrational hope so con- spicuously shown by every party having a new project for the furtherance of human welfare, there habitually goes this irrational irritation in the presence of stern truths which negative sanguine anticipations. Be it . . . some plan for reforming men by teaching ; . . . anything like calm consideration of probabilities as estimated from experience is excluded by this eager- ness for an immediate result ; and, instead of submis- sion to the necessities of things, there comes vexation, felt, if not expressed, against them, or against those who point them out, or against both." 70 I have laboured to avoid this fault by courting adverse criticism with a thankful appreciation of its value. ^[81. Some persons there are who actually look upon the ^k^*sj>f science as something wicked and uncanny, averring that it is not to be permitted to presumptuous man to read the secrets of the Most High. rg2 That such a line of argument should be taken up by Degeneration of even the most narrow-minded sectarians, can only the science. . - result from the evil repute into which the science at one time undoubtedly fell, a state of things which " HERBERT SPENCER, " Study of Sociology " (London, 1873), chap, vii., " Emotional Subjective Difficulties." AN INTRODUCTORY ARGUMENT. 77 called forth from Ferrand the expostulation, I might j. Ferrand. almost say the " Cheiromantiad," with which I have headed the Introduction to a former work : 72 " This art of Chiromancy hath been so strangely infected with superstition, deceit, cheating, and (if I durst say so), with magic also, that the Canonists, and of late years Pope Sixtus Quintus, have been con- strained utterly to condemn it; so that now no man pro- fesseth publicly this cheating art, but theeves, rogues, and beggarly rascals, which are now everywhere knowne by the name of Bohemians, Egyptians, and Caramaras, who have arrived in Europe since the year 1417, such as G. Dupreau, Albert Krantz, and Polydore Vergil." To those who would say, in the words of the Hierophant in the Zauberflote [Act I., Sc. xvi.] : " Wo willst du kiihner Fremdling bin ? Was suchst da hier im Heiligthum ? " I answer that the Book of Nature is open to all men to read, but that Nature imposes the necessity of assiduous study, before she will surrender the secrets she has veiled, with a not impenetrable cloud of obscurity. If this is not so, why has she marked the past, the present, and the future on the hands of man, who, if he will devote himself to the study, may read them ? Why has she marked indelibly and unalterably upon the hands of the hypocrite his real character, which, written on his head or face, he may conceal by the growth of his hair, or the distortion of his features ? Other theological enemies of the science aver, by ED. HERON-ALLEN, " Codex Chiromantiae " (Odd Volumes Opuscula : No. VII.), London, 1883. JACQUES FERRAND, " De la Maladie d' Amour, ou Mel cholie Erotique " (Paris 1623), ch. x*ii., p. 134- English trans- lation: "Erotomania; or, Love Melancholy" (London, 1040), p. 173- C84 Atheism. 78 CIIEIROSOPHY. what mode of reasoning I know not, that Cheirosophy argues a disbelief in the existence of a Deity, and of a future state ; on the contrary, it constantly brings before the student the evidences of an all-powerful Agency, and constantly directs his thoughts, both to the imme- diate future, which concerns us all so nearly, and to the ultimate future, which should concern us still more. Desban-olles As Desbarrolles has said, at p. 484 of his magnum opus : 72a "They wish to impede the progress of Cheiro- mancy, under the pretext that it is wrong to go beyond the limits of natural knowledge ; but do not spectacles, which restore to the sight the vigour of youth, tres- pass beyond the limits of nature ? must they, on that account, be proscribed ? and microscopes, which make visible the invisible ? and telescopes, which reveal the nature of the heavens ? " [vide If 78a .] I do not deny that there is a painful side to the Painful duties of science . that the knowledge which we obtain is often the science. terrible and saddening, betraying the faults and the misfortunes of our friends, as well as our own, and often dissipating our most fondly-cherished illusions ; but who dares to deny the inestimable value of the Parallel to science ? The astronomer, in the observatory, predicts astronomy* a storm ^ t h e means whereby the sailor's life may be endangered [not his certain death], and the sailor does not embark ; a few days or hours later the storm supervenes, and the sailor's life is not wasted. So the Cheirosophist predicts a blow by the observation of the tendencies which will bring about a misfortune ; the subject takes steps to escape it, and the blow falls harmless. Aristotle spoke truly when he said, " Homo sapiens dominabitur asfris." The astronomer warns by the promptings of astrology, the influence of the heavenly bodies upon the earth ; the astro- logical Cheiromant will tell us that he also warns " ADRIEN DESBARROLLES, "Mysteresde la Main." Revela- tions completes. Suite et Fin (Paris, 1879), AN INTRODUCTORY ARGUMENT. 79 by astrology, as the basis of the science [vide 1168]; and it is Cheirosophy which, thus based upon the highest natural influences, finds out our natural tendencies and the influences under which we principally are, and enables us to see in ourselves and others the rules by which the life, the actions, and the destiny are governed. And Cheirosophy, thus based upon Effects of astrology [if you will have it so], physiology, and Cheirosophy. ethics, gives to youth the experience and foresight of age, endows all men, who will study it, with that prescience which, under the name of intuitive faculty, is the cherished possession of so few, and enunciates and solves the problem of " Know thyself." TNQ0I 2EAYTON. Again, it reveals the natural aptitude of the young T 8 ^- ,, . ,.., .... Indications ID mind, and points out the walk m life to which it is you th. most adapted 73 ; it points out the obstacles which beset the life, and how to avoid them ; it is the pilot, which will, if properly consulted and obeyed, take us through the shoals of human tendencies ; and thus the science once proscribed, but now divested of its deceit, its mystery, and its charlatanry, shines forth with the radiance of a pure science, courting the daylight of scientific investigation, the tests of adverse criticism, time, and fanatic opposition, and the concen- trated attention of all reasoning beings. The writer in St. PauFs Magazine whom I have ,t 8 J- Ebule-Evans before quoted, remarks m connection with this argument*. 73 " Mais combien est petit le nombre des jeunes gens auxquels il arrive d'etre divines assez a temps pour etre bien diriges ! et combien aussi est petit le nombre des precepteurs qui consentent, abdiquant tout systeme exclusif, a adopter un systeme a part pour chaque genie a part. Ce ne serait pas trop attendre de la sollicitude d'un pere, mais cet effort [et il faudrait le ranger parmi les plus genereux] sera toujours au-dessus de la sollicitude venale d'un etranger." D'ARPENTIGNY. " A. EBULE-EVANS, St. Paufs Magazine, vol. xiii., p. 332, " Chiromancy." 80 CHEIROSOPIIY. science: "It is as unscientific to gauge the credibility of moral phenomena by physical tests as it would be to attempt to demonstrate physical phenomena by arguments drawn from the region of moral speculation . . . the logical lesson to be learnt from this is, Study them more closely, and endeavour to get at their explanation ; the scientific conclusion actually drawn is, We cannot explain them, ergo they are all humbug ! I venture to say that this conclusion will satisfy those alone who have never studied the history of science, and who are, therefore, not aware that every addition to our knowledge has been made in the teeth of scientific opposition." It seems to me to be a very easily conceivable thing to realize that all these indications are brought about by what we may impression ca ^> ^ or * ne sa ^ e f definition, " Currents of Impression," by the agency of the highly sensitive nerve fluid to which I have referred at length, which comes directly from the brain, and is amassed in the greatest quantity in the palm of the hand. Now, this constant passing action of a fluid endued with this great power must of necessity act upon the delicate tissues in which it works, just as the continued drop of water, or the constantly recurring footstep wears away the hardest granite ; and, knowing that this powerful agency is incessantly at work in the exquisitely sensitive palm of the hand, which is [as my whole argument has continued to show] the most important auxiliary of the sense of touch, is it rational to say that the lines there found are the result of "accident," and that Omnipotent Nature [which " does nothing in vain"] does not direct or control the clearly designated features of her most sensitive organ ? If 88. It is often considered the leading argument on the charlatanry of the science, that the Cheirosophist claims to predict a future malady, and even the time of the death of the subject whose hand he holds in AN INTRODUCTORY ARGUMENT. 8 1 his own ; but a moment's rational thought will bring the conviction that this is no charlatanry or empty arrogation of power. It must be acknowledged that in every system there must lurk the germ of the Germs of disease which will ultimately supervene, and which dlseases> may prove fatal ; at a greater or less distance of time possibly, but still there it exists, and, as it is destined to play so important a role in the history of one's life, the Omniscient Soul must be aware of it, though its knowledge may be unconscious, or rather, I would prefer to say, supra-conscious; and imperceptibly this knowledge becomes more and more strongly developed till the malady supervenes, and passes away, leaving its trace behind, or, carrying us to that bourne whence no traveller returns : and, as of a line which is destined to appear, the root must necessarily exist "Line-roots. already in the hand, it is the study of the Cheirosophist to discover that root, and predict the time of its full development and its probable effects. Who shall deny the presumption that the germs of a future disease produce certain effects upon the nerve fluid which direct the manner in which it works in the arrangement of the tactile corpuscles [vide IF 47] to produce the lines in our hands ? That the tendencies of our natures combined with f 89. other circumstances of our lives, shown by the Tendencies examination of our hands, are such as will lead, * LuhL l if unchecked, to certain specified results; that these things are, there is no possibility of denial, and it is the duty of the Cheiromant to point out those ends to which he sees an existence tending ; but be it most distinctly understood [and on this I cannot lay too much stress] that the science of Cheirosophy never pretends to say, " What is written shall be," only this, Non-fataiism that it possesses the power of warning us of events of the sc ' tea ^- which, unless controlled, will come to pass, to the end that, the warning being given and accepted, the subject 6 82 CHEIROSOPIIY. under examination may so bridle himself as to obviate the results [if bad] which will in all probability supervene if permitted so to do. 75 Thus the Cheiro- I-emosthenes on sophist can say with Demosthenes : " You need not pry into the future ; but assure yourselves it will be disastrous unless you attend to your duty, and are willing to act as becomes you." " 6 1 90. The whole question of prediction turns, as will be r ' turc> seen, on this question of the doctrine which lays down the proposition that the future is the result of the present, and that the result of present circumstances [i.e., the future] may be foreseen by minds specially trained to the minute analysis that this requires. It turns also on the question whether the future exists or not, that is to say, does " the middle of next week " exist at this moment, or does it only come into actual existence as the time comes round ; if it does not exist [i.e., if we could be suddenly projected " into the middle of next week," and were to find chaos, nothing (if such a state is remotely conceivable)], then it is simply manufactured by present events, and is at 74 Balzac on this point says : " Remarquez que predire les gros evenements de Tavenir n'est pas pour le voyant un tour de force plus extraordinaire que celui de deviner le passe. Le passe, 1'avenir sont egalement impossibles a savoir, dans le systeme des incredules. Si les evenements accomplis ont laisse des traces, il est vraisemhlable d'imaginer que les evenements T0 ' s irp6.yfj.affi, rbv vow Kal rd. irpoffrjKOvra iroifiv M\IIT', (Z ftSirai." AHM020ENOTS KATA 4>IAinnOT. A'. And again : EtVJ rolvvv rivls ot rdr' (t\iyx fl> ' rov ifapi^vra otovrai eireidai> (pUTTrjffuffi, rl otv yfi] iroitlv ; oh iyu p.lv rb SiKatoTarov Ka.1 &\ir)6t